natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvad angår ændringsforslag 25 og 30 vü jeg geme gøre opmærksom på, at det næppe er realistisk at ophæve visumtvangen og muligheden for afvisning ved grænsen.
Concerning Amendments Nos 25 and 30, I should point out that it is hardly realistic to lift the requirement for a visa and the ability to turn crossers back at the border.
Det er en kendsgerning, at hver medlemsstat for tiden selv afgør spørgsmålet om udstedelsen af visum.
It is a fact that at the moment every Member State decides for itself on the need for a visa.
Med hensyn til afvisning henhører punktet under Genèvekonventionen.
As for sending people back, that falls under the Geneva Convention.
Det er i den danske oversættelse blevet oversat med embaUage.
The Danish translation translates this as 'packaging'.
Emballage henleder jo straks tankerne på en fysisk indpakning, og det er der bestemt ikke tale om.
Of course, packaging immediately leads one to think of physical packaging, and that is definitely not what this is about.
I ændringsforslag 19 er ordene poleret ris taget ud af den danske oversættelse, det vü sige, at man fortsat kan foretage overfladebehandling af polerede ris, selvom det modsatte er tilfældet i ændringsforslag 19.1 ændringsforslag 15 står der flydende kaffe og te på dåse, medens der i den franske står flydende kaffe og drikkevarer baseret på te på dåse.
In Amendment No 19, the words 'polished rice' have been removed from the Danish translation: in other words, polished rice can still be surface treated, even though Amendment No 19 states the opposite. Amendment 15 refers to liquid coffee and tea in tins, while the French refers to liquid coffee and drinks based on tea in tins.
Når vi nu stemmer om ting, som er temmelig tekniske, og vi er jo ikke tekniske eksperter, så mener jeg, at det er ret vigtigt, at de oversættelser, vi får, er korrekte.
If we are voting on subjects which are reasonably technical, and of course we are not experts, I think it is very important that the translations we are given are conect.
Jeg mener selvfølgelig ikke, at vi ikke skal stemme om disse ændringsforslag, men jeg vil gerne henstille til, at man checker, at de danske oversættelser for fremtiden er væsentlig mere korrekte, end det har været tilfældet med denne betænkning. ning.
I do not mean of course that we should not vote on these proposed amendments, but I would like to ask that people check that the Danish translations are more accurate in future than is the case with this report.
Og nu til ændringsforslag nr. 20: Granden til, at Kommissionen i art. 12 ikke har fastlagt høring af Parlamentet som en betingelse, er, at Ministerrådet skal kunne reagere hurtigt i tilfælde af masseflugt.
Now to Amendment No 20. The reason why the Commission has not provided for consultation of Parliament as an absolute condition in article 12, is that the Council of Ministers must be able to react quickly in cases of mass flight.
I reatiteten vil Parlamentet dog selvfølgelig straks blive informeret.
In practice Parliament will then of course be told directly.
Formanden. - Mange tak for Deres indlæg, fru Sandbæk.
President. - Thank you very much, Mrs Sandbaek.
Jeg er helt sikker på, at de nødvendige sproglige undersøgelser vil blive iværksat for at der ikke skal bestå tvivl eller usikkerheder i den endelige udgave.
All the necessary linguistic checks will certainly be made so that no doubts or ambiguities remain at the end of our work.
En sidste generel bemærkning:' Ved forhandlingerne i Ministerrådet, som jo skal finde sted nu, vil vi geme fremlægge Parlamentets positive bemærkninger, og vi håber, at vi på denne måde kan opnå et fornuftigt kompromis. mis.
My last general comment: during our discussion in the Council of Ministers, which will now take place, we shall be happy to include the positive comments of Parliament and hope in this way to achieve a sensible compromise.
(Den lovgivningsmæssige beslutning vedtoges) *
(Parliament adopted the legislative resolution)
Diez de Rivera Icaza (PSE). - (ES) Undskyld, hr. formand, det er et andet spørgsmål.
Diez de Rivera Icaza (PSE). - (ES) Excuse me, Mr President, I wish to refer to another matter.
I betænkning af Breyer, jeg ved ikke, om det skyldes træthed eUer sygdom eller begge dele, men jeg har villet stemme mod ændringsforslag nr. 6, og jeg er ikke sikker på, om jeg har gjort det på grund af min træthed og tilstand.
In the vote on the Breyer report, I intended to vote against Amendment No 6, but - either through tiredness or illness, or both at once -1 am not sure that I did.
Jeg vil derfor bekræfte, at jeg har villet stemme mod ændringsforslag nr. 6.
I should therefore like it to be recorded that I voted against Amendment No 6.
Det almindelige budget for 1998
1998 general budget
Europa-Parlamentet har det afgørende ord.
Yesterday, in the debate on the Wiebenga report, we in the Group of the European People's Party requested an an swer from the Commission, but we did not get it.
Men da uden rigspolitikken, indtil videre, er et mellemstatsligt anliggende, er det traktatstridigt at tildele Europa-Parlamentet en sådan beføjelse.
I shall not delay everything now by touching on all the points involved, but I can mention one, which is the sharing of responsibility for temporary protection of displaced per sons.
Dette misforhold, som i øvrigt viser, i hvor høj grad institutionerne bryder reglerne, når det passer dem, er i sig selv tilstrækkelig grund til at forkaste budgettet af principielle grunde.
In any case I would now like to give the Commissioner the opportunity to answer, since for reasons of democracy it would perhaps have been reasonable for the Group of the European People's Party to hear the Commission's views on our significant amendments in this area, even if very briefly.
Dell'Alba (ARE). - (LT) Hr. formand, jeg vil meget gerne afgive denne stemmeforklaring.
Dell'Alba (ARE). - (LT) Mr President, I am very keen to cast this vote.
Vi har været igennem en vigtig dag, og det er også vigtigt, at det for fremtidige generationer fremgår af protokollen, at jeg på vegne af min gruppe og talrige andre kolleger føler mig dybt skuffet i øjebUkket.
We have experienced an important day and so it is also important for a record to be made in the Minutes for future reference of the profound disappoint ment that both I, on behalf of my group, and many other colleagues, feel at this time.
Det skyldes, at man ved afslutningen af en budgetprocedure, der har været præget af en forstå elsens dialog og tolerance, har accepteret at følge en procedure, der - helt i strid med forretningsordenens bestemmelser - har vedtaget en hel række punkter gen nem mundtlige ændringsforslag - hvilket i praksis er flere millioner ECU, som vi mundtligt har besluttet at bevilge eller afvist at bevilge over budgettet - og jeg beklager, at en række ændringsforslag, som enten Budgetudvalget eller de berørte udvalg havde vedtaget, ikke er blevet vedtaget her i salen.
Let me explain: at the end of a budget procedure, marked by an atmosphere of dialogue, of tolerance, in which all the political groups, with a spirit of understanding, agreed that a procedure be adopted which has caused a whole series of points to be passed with oral amendments, against all the rules, which, in practice, means several million ECU which we have orally decided to allocate or not to allocate in the budget. I am sony that a series of amendments, accepted by the Committee on Budgets and by the relevant committees, did not have the support of the Chamber.
Jeg synes, at det er vigtigt, at vores skuffelse over den smålighed, der har præget behandlingen af nogle ændringsforslag, føres til protokols.
It seems important to me that our disappointment at the poor way in which several amendments have been made should be recorded.
Ephrimidis (GUE/NGL), skriftlig. - (EL) Forslaget til almindeligt budget for 1998 udgør endnu et forsøg på skamløst at tilsidesætte arbejdstagerne og den offentlige mening.
Wulf-Mathies, Member of the Commission. - (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I hope the information I have been given is conect, and that you have accepted the
Af demagogiske grunde og for at bortlede opmærksomheden fra det brændende beskæftigelsesproblem afsættes der kun et latterligt lille og utilstrækkeligt beløb på ECU 150 millioner hertil.
23.10.97 ment with forecasts of the availability of the derisory sum of ECU 150 million.
Rübig (PPE). - (DE) Hr. formand, på vegne af de østrigske PPE-parlamentsmedlemmer fra ÖVP vil jeg geme understrege, at vi ved budgetafstemningen især går ind for sikkerhed, sundhedsbeskyttelse og de informationsrettigheder og - pligter, som skal sikres på atomenergiudvindingsområdet ved hjælp af tilsvarende midler.
Rübig (PPE). ­ (DE) Mr President, on behalf of the Austrian ÖVP Members I should like to emphasize that we support the budget decision, particularly on safety, safeguarding of health and right to information, which in the area of nuclear energy production must be guaranteed by appropriate means.
Det er patetisk at lade som om der er afsat bevillinger til arbejdsløsheden og beskæftigelsen, når Den Europæiske Unions budget ikke er forhøjet med én eneste ECU og det blot er overskrifterne på visse budgetposter, der ændres.
It is a hypocritical attempt to present budget appropria­tions as available for unemployment and for employment, at a time when not a single ECU has been added to the European Union budget and when the titles of certain lines are simply being changed.
Europa-Parlamentets forslag vedrørende beskæftigelsen, som vi endnu ikke engang ved, om Rådet vil acceptere, beløber sig til omkring ECU 8 pr. registreret arbejdsløs og er naturligvis ikke tilstrækkelige til bare på mindste måde at bidrage til imødegåelsen af dette problem, der er af så afgørende betydning for Europas folk.
The European Parliament's proposals on employment, which are not sure of being accepted by the Council, amount to approximately ECU 8 per registered unemployed person, and naturally that is incapable of contributing in the least to addressing this most critical issue for the people of Europe.
De er kun et alibi for dem, der af hensyn til de store virksomheders konkurrenceevne og opretholdelsen af storkapitalens kæmpeprofitter accepterer et ægte knaphedsbudget, der går ud over arbejdstagerne og de små og mellemstore virksomheder.
They are simply an alibi for those who adopt yet another grim austerity budget for working people, farmers and small and medium­sized businesses, in the name of the competi­tiveness of large concerns and in support of the exorbitant profits of big finance.
Det er soleklart, at bevillingsniveauet til de økonomiske og sociale aspekter (arbejdsløshed, socialsikring, uddannelse og sundhed) har nået et utilladeligt lavt leje.
Berthu (NT), in writing. ­ (FR) I voted against the draft general budget for 1998 to show my disapproval, first of the increased amount of expenditure on the structural funds, which has been forecast since the preliminary draft, but also of the other increased expenditure which the European Parliament requests.
Samtidig er der ingen tvivl om, at storkapitalens og de multinationale koncerners profitter vil nå nye højder.
In fact, the Commission had presented a preliminary draft in which payment appropriations rose to ECU 91,350 billion.
Dette viser kun alt for tydeligt, at vi nu har fået et endnu værre og mere absurd budget for Den Europæiske Union.
The Council reduced this figure to 90,884, to make the Union partici­pate in the budgetary discipline efforts which are de­manded of the Member States in view of the single cunency.
Det er endda kun i budgetspørgsmål, at Europaparlamentet har en smule reel magt.
However, it is also certain that the profitability of big finance and its conglomerates will reach new record highs.
Det er på tide, at vi udøver den til fordel for arbejdstagerne og folkene, der med deres stemmer har gjort Parlamentet til Den Europæiske Unions lovgivningsmæssige organ.
This is evidence of the fact that we have an even worse example of European Union budgetary absurdity.
Flemming, Habsburg-Lothringen, Rack, Rübig, Schierhuber, Stenzel (PPE), skriftlig. - (DE) De seks under skrivende østrigske PPE-parlamentsmedlemmer fra ÖVP stemte for budgettet, fordi det er et godt og vigtigt instrument til at videreudvikle vores fælles Union.
When all is said and done it is only in budgetary matters that the European Parliament has any real power. It is time that this power was exercised on behalf of working people, on behalf of the people who, with their votes, elected it as an institutional body of the European Union.
Hvad sidstnævnte angår ønsker jeg endnu en gang at understrege, at jeg finder det uacceptabelt, at indvandrersammenslutninger som Det Europæiske Indvandrerforum, der finansieres fuldt ud af Kommissionen - det vil sige af de europæiske skatteydere - indbydes til møder i Europa-Parlamentet for at belære os om, hvilke borgerrettigheder vi bør tildele tredjelandsstatsborgere.
On this subject, I would remind you once again that it is intolerable to see associations of immigrants, like the Immigrants Forum, which are 100 % subsidized by the Commission ­ that is, the taxpayers of the countries of Europe ­ being invited to meetings of the European Parliament to give us lessons on citizenship rights that we ought to grant to nationals of third countries.
Denne form for konstant indoktrinering fra Kommissionens side for at få os til at gå med til, hvad jeg mener er antieuropæiske politikker, bør straffes.
There should be sanctions against this permanent brainwashing used by the Commission uses to get policies I consider anti­European accepted.
Kommissionen bør, én gang for alle, fratages de bevillinger, der gør det muligt for den at manipulere med opinionen.
Once and for all, the Commission must be deprived of appropriations it uses to manipulate opinion.
Vi protesterer dog på det kraftigste mod den »Herodespræmie«, der er indeholdt i budgettet, som er en præmie for at slå nyfødte kalve ihjel.
We protest most emphatically, however, against the 'Herod Premium' contained in the budget, which is a payment for the killing of new­born calves.
Vi vil gøre alt, hvad der står i vores magt, for at denne præmie ikke figurerer i det næste budget.
We shall do everything within our power to see that this premium is no longer included in the next budget.
Endelig rammer budgetforslaget i juridisk henseende et alvorligt misforhold.
Finally, the draft budget includes a serious legal enor.
Ved en aftale af 16. juli i år mellem Kommissionen, Parlamentet og Rådet besluttede man, at bevillingerne til den fælles udenrigspolitik kunne henføres til kategorien »ikke-obligatoriske udgifter«, hvorom
By an agreement signed on 16 July between the Commission, Parliament and the Council, it was accepted that the common foreign policy budget should be placed in the category of 'non­obligatory' expenditure, on which the European Parliament has the last word.
Kirsten Jensen, Blak og Iversen (PSE), skriftlig. - (DA) De danske socialdemokrater støtter forslaget om, at EU
This situation, which shows in passing how much the European institutions disregard the letter of texts when they want to, would by itself justify rejecting the budget on principle.
Kirsten Jensen, Blak og Iversen skal give støtte til oprettelse af et informationskontor for økologisk landbrug i EU.
Kirsten Jensen, Blak and Iversen (PSE), in writing. -(DA) The Danish Social Democrats support the proposal that the EU should provide assistance for setting up an information office for organic farming in the EU.
Derudover mener vi, at der skal holdes streng kontrol med de penge, der i budgettet er afsat til Tyrkiet.
We also believe strict control should be exercised over the money set aside in the budget for Turkey.
Vi mener, det er vigtigt, at alle de 11 officielle sprog i EU fortsat har samme officielle status.
We think it is important that all 11 official languages of the EU continue to enjoy the same official status.
Derfor støtter vi, at der fortsat afsættes det fulde beløb til oversættelse af referatet fra Europa-Parlamentets samlinger.
We are therefore in favour of the full amount continuing to be set aside for translations of the proceedings of the European Parliament.
Endvidere støtter vi idéen om, at der holdes bedre kontrol med Europaparlamentarikernes rejsegodtgørelser.
We are also in favour of more control of MEPs' travel accounts.
Rejseudgifter bør refunderes efter de faktiske afholdte udgifter eller mod fremlæggelse af bevis for rejsens afholdelse efter billigste offentliggjorte tarif.
Travelling expenses should be refunded on the basis of expenses actually incuned or on submission of evidence that the journey was made at the cheapest published rate.
Sonneveld (PPE), skriftlig. - (NL) Med hensyn til land brugsudgifterne kan det konstateres, at samarbejdet mellem Rådet, Parlamentet og Kommissionen i år har en meget mere åben og mere kontinuerlig karakter end i foregående år.
Martinez (NI), in writing. - (FR) My observations refer to the agricultural rationing budget for 1998.
Det gælder også for Parlamentets to udvalg: Budgetudvalget og Landbrugsudvalget.
In fact, what appropriations do we see for agriculture?
Ved i tide at have en mening klar om det foreløbige budgetforslag var en meningsfyldt trilogi mulig, inden Rådet fastsatte budget forslaget.
They are limited to ECU 40.8 billion, and only increase by 0.45 %.
Realitetsindholdet blev derved sikret på en bedre måde end i de foregående år.
In other words, beggarly!
Martinez (NI), skriftlig. - (FR) Mine bemærkninger drejer sig om de rationerede landbrugsbevillinger for 1998.
Ephremidis (GUE/NGL), in writing. - (EL) The draft general budget for 1998 is a shameful attempt at pulling the wool over the eyes of working people and public opinion.
For hvad konstaterer man, når man ser, hvad der er afsat til landbruget?
It totally butchers budget expenditure in the agricultural sector, whose viability is in the most dangerous crisis, and in the structural sector, with the structural funds and the cohesion fund.
Der er afsat maksimalt ECU 40,8 milliarder, en stigning på kun 0,45 %.
For reasons of demagogy and disorienta­tion it makes a gesture towards the scourge of unemploy­
Med andre ord: almisser!
Debates of the European Parliament
I det følgende budgetår må det overvejes om denne noget simple og automatiske behandling af den lineære nedskæring bør gentages.
In a subsequent budget year it must be considered whether this fairly simplistic and automatic across-the-board re duction approach can be repeated.
Parlamentet vil fortsat foretrække en eventuel nedskæring på basis af de nyeste erfaringer.
Parliament still prefers reduction on the basis of recent experience.
Men som sagt, det at ad hov proceduren holdes åben efter førstebehandUngen i Parlamentet imødekommer i høj grad denne indvending.
But as has been said, keeping the ad hoc procedure open after the first reading by Parliament largely deals with that objec tion.
Landbobefolkningen spares ikke for noget.
The agricultural population is spared nothing.
Der er kun afsat ECU 3 millioner til biavlerne; ECU 3 millioner til de bier, der sikrer bestøvningen og forøger frugtavlens udbytter med 30 %.
Only ECU 3 million-are found for bee-keepers. ECU 3 million for bees, which provide pollination, and increase fruit farm yields by 30 %.
Til gengæld er der afsat ECU 38 millioner til EUpropaganda, nemlig til fremme af euroen inden for rammerne af PRINCE-programmet.
By contrast, for European propaganda, for the promotion of the euro within the Prince programme, ECU 38 million are found.
ECU 38 millioner kastet op i luften mod kun ECU 3 millioner til den yderst vigtige biavl!
ECU 38 million thrown away on wind, against just ECU 3 million for a paramount activity like bee-keeping!
Ganske vist har man fundet ECU 15 millioner til fremme af kvalitetslandbrugsvarer.
Admittedly ECU 15 million were found for promoting the quality of agricultural products.
Men på grund af BSE, der - som påpeget af overvågningsudvalget - kunne have været undgået, havde det ikke været for den øverste EU-administrations fejltagelser, har man brugt ikke mindre end ECU 1,5 milliarder i 1996 og ECU 2,2 milliarder i 1997.
But because of BSE, which could have been avoided but for the mistakes of top European civil servant - as the committee of inquiry reminded us - no less than ECU 1.5 billion were spent in 1996, and ECU 2.2 billion in 1997.
Det er landbrugerne, der skal bøde for industriens og topembedsmændenes fejl, men de samme landbrugere må ikke støttes over landbrugsbevillingerne!
The farmers must repair the mistakes of senior civil servants and industry, but the agricultural budget must not support those same farmers!
Finansieringen af indkomsttilskuddene har under budget forhandlingen i år stået i centrum af debatten.
When the budget was examined this year the main focus was on the financing of additional revenue.
Ved et truende underskud på landbrugsbudgettet (oprindelig på grund af BSE-krisen) greb Kommissionen øjebUkkeligt til denne budgetpost og foreslog en lineær nedskæring på 7 % af udgifterne. Kommissionen anvendte selv argumentet om den eksisterende overkompensation.
Where there was an imminent deficit in the agriculture budget (initially because of the BSE crisis) the Commission immediately resorted to this budget item and proposed an across-the-board reduction of 7 % in expenditure.
Rådet og Parlamentet har rent ud modsat sig Kommissionens for slag. Selvfølgelig med succes.
The Council and Parliament were strongly opposed to the Commission's approach and were of course successful.
Alligevel er denne behandling utilfredsstillende.
Even so, the way in which the matter was handled was still unsatisfactory.
I fremtiden må vi se alvorligt på et system om differentiering af tilskuddene pr. hektar og pr. dyr.
In future we must look seriously into ways of differentiating between premiums per hectare and per head of livestock.
Men i øvrigt mener jeg, det er nødvendigt - af hensyn til en større kontinuitet af finansieringen af landbrugstilskuddene - at vi forsøger at finde frem til en ny egen logik for finansieringen af disse udgifter.
But I also think that to put the financing of the agricultural income premiums on a more durable footing we should look for our own new system of financing such expenditure.
Ikke mindst nu, hvor disse indkomsttilskud büver så vigtige, at de nu groft sagt udgør halvdelen af udgifterne i Garantiafdeling under EOGFL.
Certainly income premiums are becoming so much more important that they now account for roughly half the expenditure of the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF.
For otte år siden var det kun nogle få procent.
A few years ago it was only a few per cent.
Fordelingen af byrderne for disse meget specifikke udgifter, der efter min mening ikke kan sammenlignes med de andre EU-udgifter, er dog forblevet uændret, og spørgsmålet er, om det på sigt er holdbart.
However the burden of this very specific expenditure, which in my opinion cannot be compared with the rest of the EU's expenditure, is still shared in the same way and it is extremely doubtful whether this situation is tenable in the long term.
Souchet (I-EDN), skriftlig. - (FR) Ved at nægte 'at stemme for forslaget til Den Europæiske Unions budget for 1998 som forelagt for plenarforsamlingen af Parlamentets Budgetudvalg har jeg ønsket at markere min uenighed på en række væsentlige punkter.
The symbol of this anti-farmer budgetary destitution is something we caused here when we voted on the 1998 budget, by rejecting the amendment on developing the use of wool.
Domstolen have allerede fastslået, at uld ikke er et landbrugsprodukt.
The European Court of Justice had already removed wool from agricultural products.
Nu nægter man at gøre det muligt at anvende den samme uld.
At present, using that same wool is made impossible.
Vore hyrder og fåreavlere har kun den udvej tilbage selv at betale, først for klipningen og siden for destruktionen af den uld, der kommer ud af denne.
Our shepherds and sheep-breeders have no other solution than to pay both for shearing and for destroying the product of shearing.