natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der kan dog være tilfælde, hvor føreren af et køretøj efter at være kørt ind i en anden medlemsstat (for eksempel ved en ulykke) kan blive bedt om at fremlægge bevis for, at der findes en ansvarsforsikring.
There may, however, be instances after entering another Member State (e.g. in the event of an accident) where the driver can be asked for evidence that third party insurance does exist and where it has been taken out.
Den letteste og internationalt mest anerkendte måde at bevise dette er stadig det grønne kort.
The easiest and internationally most accepted way of producing this evidence is still the Green Card.
Skønt det ikke længere er nødvendigt at have et grønt kort for at køre i en anden medlemsstat, kan det stadig anbefales at være i besiddelse af et.
Thus, while it is no longer necessary for entering and driving in another Member State, its possession is still advisable.
Spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt den forsikrede har ret til at kræve et grønt kort fra det forsikringsselskab, der har udstedt ansvarsforsikringen, omhandles ikke af fællesskabslovgivningen.
The question whether the policyholder is entitled to require a Green Card from his third party insurer is not dealt with by Community law.
Det afhænger af kontraktforholdet mellem den forsikrede og forsikringsselskabet og eventuelt af forholdet mellem forsikringsselskabet og den grønt kort-organisation, det tilhører.
It depends on the contractual relations between the policyholder and his insurer and possibly on the relationship between the insurer and the Green Card organisation it belongs to.
Kommissionen har således ret begrænsede muligheder for at påvirke forsikringsselskaberne eller tilsynsmyndighederne.
Thus, the Commission's powers to influence the insurers or their supervisory authorities are rather limited.
Kommissionen har henvendt sig til de britiske myndigheder vedrørende dette spørgsmål for at undersøge, om dette kan lade sig gøre i Det Forenede Kongerige uden at skulle igennem den tunge lovgivningsprocedure på europæisk plan.
Indeed, the Commission has approached the British authorities on this matter in order to explore whether this aim can be achieved in the United Kingdom without burdensome legislative steps being required on a European level.
Spørgsmål nr. 87 af Patricia McKenna (H-0091/96) Om: Forskelsbehandling af homoseksuelle i EU's institutioner
Question No 87 by Patricia McKenna (H-0091/96) Subject: Discrimination against homosexual staff in EU institutions
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe for at bringe forskelsbehandlingen af homoseksuelle i EU's institutioner til ophør, idet den især nægter at give de ansatte, som har levet i langvarige homoseksuelle forhold, de samme rettigheder i henhold til EU's tjenestemandsvedtægt som gifte EU-tjenéstemænd, der lever i et heteroseksuelt forhold, i betragtning af, at ikkeforskelsbehandling "er et af de fundamentale principper i EU, og at adskillige medlemsstater, herunder Sverige, Danmark, Finland og Nederlandene, har indført anti-diskriminerende foranstaltninger på dette område?
What action will the Commission be taking to end discrimination against gays and lesbians in EU institutions, particularly through its refusal to grant those in longterm homosexual relationships the same entitlements under EU Staff Regulations as married EU officials in a heterosexual relationship, given that the principle of non-discrimination is fundamental to the ELI and that several Member States, including Sweden, Denmark, Finland and the Netherlands, have introduced anti-discrimination measures on this subject?
Kommissionen har altid systematisk bekæmpet enhver form for forskelsbehandling, navnlig af seksuelle grunde, og ingen af EU's vedtægter tillader en sådan forskelsbehandling.
The Commission has always been systematically opposed to all forms of discrimination, particularly those connected with sexual orientation, and there are no provisions in the Staff Regulations for such discrimination.
For øvrigt vil der snarest blive stillet forslag om en ændring af vedtægterne, således at der ikke kan diskrimineres mod tjenestemænd på grund homoseksualitet i forbindelse med ansættelse og karriereforløb.
Furthermore, a change to the Staff Regulations is shortly to be proposed so that no distinction can be made, particularly on the grounds of sexual orientation, with regard to recruitment and career development of officials.
Kommissionen kan imidlertid bekræfte, at den opmærksomt følger udviklingen i de nationale lovgivninger på dette område, således at den i påkommende tilfælde kan drage konsekvensen heraf.
However, the Commission can confirm that it is closely monitoring developments in national legislation in this respect and that it will in due course draw the appropriate conclusions.
I denne ånd er Kommissionen i færd med at undersøge konkrete, økonomisk neutrale foranstaltninger, der ikke er omfattet af vedtægterne til fordel for ugifte homo- og heteroseksuelle par.
Accordingly, the Commission is currently looking into specific, financially neutral measures outside the Staff Regulations in favour of non-married homosexual or heterosexual couples.
* * Spørgsmål nr. 88 af Arlene McCarthy (H-0100/96) Om: »Regional Challenge«
Question No 88 by Arlene McCarthy (H-0100/96) Subject: Regional Challenge
Mener Kommissionen, at den britiske »Regional Challenge«-ordning (regional udfordring) giver valuta for pengene, og vil den i benægtende fald afskaffe denne ordning i forbindelse med revisionen af mål 2?
Is the Commission convinced that the UK Regional Challenge scheme provides good value for money and if not will the Commission undertake to abolish it under the review of Objective 2?
En intern analyse, som Kommissionen foretog af forslagene under Regional Challenge, tydede på, at de giver valuta for pengene, hvad angår tilskudssatser og bidrag fra den private sektor.
An internal analysis of the Regional Challenge bids carried out by the Commission indicated that they seemed to represent good value for money in terms of grant rates and private sector contributions.
Der er imidlertid ikke foretaget en sådan analyse vedrørende udbyttet eller de økonomiske profiler af de endeligt udvalgte projekter.
However, no such analysis has been carried out with respect to the outputs, or the financial profiles of projects that have finally been selected.
Kommissionen mangler stadig at få tilfredsstillende oplysninger om resultatet af første runde af Regional Challenge-ordningen.
The Commission has yet to receive satisfactory information regarding the outcome of the first round of Regional Challenge.
Kommissionen har ikke modtaget nogen officiel meddelelse fra den britiske regering om alle projekter, der er blevet bevilliget støtte.
It has not received official notification from the United Kingdom Government of all the bids which have been successful.
Den er ikke blevet informeret om de projekter, der er blevet bevilliget støtte i mål 2området Industrial South Wales og mål 5b-området Rural Wales.
The successful bids in Industrial South Wales Objective 2 region and Rural Wales Objective 5b region have not been announced.
Endvidere har Kommissionen endnu ikke godkendt visse større projekter, der er udvalgt af de britiske ministre.
Furthermore, certain large projects selected by UK Ministers have still to be approved by the Commission.
I nogle tilfælde, hvor Kommissionen er klar over, hvilke projekter der er blevet udvalgt, foreligger der endnu ikke økonomiske profiler og indikationer af udbyttet.
In some of the cases where the Commission is aware of projects which have been selected, financial profiles and indications of outputs have not yet been provided.
I mindst et tilfælde er der endnu ikke givet planlægningstilladelse til et godkendt forslag, så behandlingen af ansøgningen om støtte fra Regionalfonden kan ikke komme videre.
In at least one case, a successful bid has not yet received planning permission, so the application for Regional Fund assistance cannot proceed.
Derfor er det for tidligt for Kommissionen at fremsætte en endelig udtalelse om, hvorvidt de projekter, der finansieres gennem programmet Regional Challenge, giver valuta for pengene.
Accordingly, it is too early for the Commission to form a definitive view regarding the value for money of Regional Challenge-funded projects.
I en skrivelse af 7. december 1994 til Det Forenede Kongeriges faste repræsentation accepterede Kommissionen, at £160 mio fra strukturfondene skulle øremærkes til hver af de to runder under programmet Regional Challenge, der skal afholdes i programperioderne 1994-6 og 1997-9.
In a letter of 7 December 1994 to the United Kingdom Permanent Representative, the Commission agreed that £160 million would be earmarked from Structural Fund resources for each of the two Regional Challenge rounds to be held in the 1994-6 and 1997-9 programming periods.
I princippet ønsker Kommissionen ikke at genforhandle denne aftale, men den vil sikre sig, at man i næste runde nøje overholder betingelserne om gennemsigtighed i beslutningsproceduren og sikrer overensstemmelse med de regionale udviklingsstrategier, der findes i enhedsprogrammeringsdokumenterne.
In principle, the Commission does not intend to renegotiate this agreement, but will ensure that the next round is subject to strict conditions regarding transparency of decisionmaking, and coherence with the regional development strategies contained in the Single Programming Documents.
Komrhissionen vil også foretrække, at projekterne udvælges i overensstemmelse med udvalgte temaer såsom beskæftigelsesstøtte til små og mellemstore virksomheder, bekæmpelse af social udstødelse eller lige muligheder for kvinder og mænd.
It would also prefer the projects to be chosen according to selected themes, such as creating employment support for small and mediumsized companies, social inclusion or equal opportunities for women and men.
* Spørgsmål nr. 89 af David Hallam (H-0102/96) Om: Regional Udfordring
Question No 89 by David Hallam (H-0102/96) Subject: Regional Challenge
Har Kommissionen drøftet programmet Regional Udfordring med den britiske regering og vicepremierminister Heseltine, og hvad er resultaterne af disse drøftelser?
Has the Commission had an exchange of views on the Regional Challenge scheme with the UK Government and Deputy Prime Minister Mr Heseltine, and what is the outcome of those discussions?
Kommissionen mødtes, med vicepremierministeren, direktøren for handelsministeriet og industri ministeren den 23. november i fjor.
The Commission met the Deputy Prime Minister, the President of the Board of Trade, and the Industry Minister on 23 November last year.
Et af de emner, der blev drøftet, var forløbet af første runde af programmet Regional Challenge.
One of the issues discussed was the progress of round one of the Regional Challenge scheme.
Man udvekslede synspunkter om, hvordan erfaringerne fra første runde kan påvirke udviklingen af anden runde.
There was an exchange of views as to how the lessons learned in round one might inform the development of round two.
Kommissionen gav udtryk for sin bekymring over muligheden for, at partnerskaberne kunne føle sig tilsidesatte, hvis de ikke blev holdt informeret om udviklingen med hensyn til projekterne, indtil de endelige afgørelser blev truffet.
The Commission voiced its concern at the possibility that partnerships might feel marginalised if they were not kept fully informed of the progress of the bids until the final decisions were made.
Kommissionen udtrykte også bekymring over, at ikke alle forslag under Regional Challenge, var blevet vurderet i overensstemmelse med de procedurer, der er fastlagt
It was also concerned that not all Regional Challenge bids had been assessed according to the procedures established in the Single Programming Documents (SPDs).
Endvidere anførte Kommissionen, at man under anden runde af Regional Challenge bør finde frem til projekter af høj kvalitet i bestemte områder af interesse for programmet, som eksempelvis støtte til små og mellemstore virksomheder, bekæmpelse af social udstødelse eller lige muligheder for kvinder og mænd.
14.2.96 support for small and mediumsized businesses, social inclusion and equal opportunities for women and men.
Som et resultat af drøftelserne, anførte ministrene, at Regional Challenge nøje vil afspejle udviklingsstrategierne i EPD.
As a result of the discussions, Ministers indicated that Regional Challenge would closely reflect the development strategies contained in the SPDs.
Ydermere påtog de sig at foretage en evaluering både af kvaliteten og af, hvorvidt man får valuta for pengene (inklusive udbytte og økonomiske profiler) både ved projekter, der fik bevilliget støtte, og projekter, der ikke fik bevilliget støtte første runde af Regional Challenge.
In addition, they undertook to carry out an evaluation both of the quality and of the value for money (including outputs and financial profiles) of projects that were successful and those that were unsuccessful in the first round of Regional Challenge.
De var overbeviste öm, at programmet Regional Challenge vil kunne yde et betydeligt bidrag på bestemte områder inden for programmerne.
They were confident that Regional Challenge could make a significant contribution to particular themes within programmes.
Spørgsmål nr. 90 af Alan Donnelly (H-0103/96) Om: Regional Udfordring
Question No 90 by Alan Donnelly (H-0103/96) Subject: Regional Challenge
Hvad er Kommissionens holdning til programmet Regional Udfordring, som for øjeblikket bliver gennemført, dvs. at projekter, som har fået en lav prioritering af regionale partnerskaber på grund af manglende regional dimension, senere har fået støtte fra Regionalfonden som følge af beslutninger truffet af ministre eller hr. Heseltine inden for regionen?
What is the Commission's view of the Regional Challenge schemes as currently operated: namely, that projects awarded low scores by regional partnerships because they do not demonstrate a 'regional dimension', have subsequently been awarded ERDF funding EIS a result of decisions taken by government ministers and Mr Heseltine outside the region.
Er Kommissionen ikke enig i, at beslutninger burde træffes af regionale partnerskaber inden for regionerne?
Does the Commission not agree that decisions should be taken by regional partnerships, within the region?
Kommissionen kender ikke til tilfælde, hvor tilsynsudvalgenes beslutninger klart er blevet tilsidesat af ministre.
The Commission is not aware of any cases where decisions of monitoring committees have clearly been overturned by Ministers.
Kommissionen er dog bekymret for gennemsigtigheden af beslutningsprocessen og konsekvensen i den fremgangsmåde, der er vedtaget for udvælgelse af projekter i de forskellige regioner.
However, the Commission does have concerns about the transparency of the decisionmaking process, and consistency of approach adopted in selecting projects amongst different regions.
Princippet om »lokalt ejerskab« er centralt for forvaltningen af strukturfondene, hvor projekter udvælges i regionale partnerskaber.
The principle of 'local ownership' is central to the administration of the Structural Funds, where projects are chosen within regional partnerships.
Med hensyn til programmet Regional Challenge, hvor ministrene træffer de endelige afgørelser, er der imidlertid en risiko for, at disse partnerskaber kan føle sig tilsidesat, især hvis de ikke holdes løbende informeret om forslagenes udvikling på de forskellige trin i beslutningsprocessen.
In respect of Regional Challenge, however, where Ministers will be taking the final decisions, there is a danger that these partnerships might feel marginalised, specially if they are not kept fully informed of the progress of the bids at every stage of the decisionmaking process.
Derfor indskærpede Kommissionen også på et møde over for de britiske ministre, at de skal sikre sig, at beslutningsprocessen for Regional Challenge er klar og tydelig.
Accordingly, at its meeting with UK Ministers, the Commission impressed upon them the need to ensure that the decisionmaking process for Regional Challenge was clear and transparent.
Kommissionen mener, at udvælgelsesprocessen for programmet Regional Challenge skal gøres mere effektiv og gennemsigtig, og at forslagene vil blive af bedre kvalitet, hvis partnerskaberne får mulighed for at spille en mere aktiv rolle ved fastlæggelsen af, hvilke projekter der er behov for (på baggrund af strategien i enhedsprogrammeringsdokumenterne) og ved at tilskynde velegnede partnere til at gå sammen om at udvikle projekter, der opfylder disse behov.
The Commission feels that the Regional Challenge selection process could be made more efficient and transparent, and the quality of the bids improved, if partnerships were able to take a more proactive role in identifying the types of projects that are needed (based on the strategy contained in the SPDs) and in encouraging suitable partners to come together to develop projects to meet these needs.
Et sådant arbejde bør finde sted som led i den fortsatte dialog, der er vigtig for styringen af økonomiske programmer, og ikke blot som en del af udvælgelsesprocessen inden for programmet Regional Challenge.
Such work ought to take place as part of the ongoing dialogue essential to economic programming rather than merely as part of the Regional Challenge application process.
Spørgsmål nr. 91 af Barry Seal (H-0104/96) Om: »Regional Challenge«
Question No 91 by Barry Seal (H-0104/96) Subject: Regional Challenge
Kommissionen bestræber sig meget på at finde metoder til at gøre strukturfondene mere effektive.
The Commission is keen to explore ways of improving the effectiveness of the Structural Funds.
Idégrundlaget fór programmet Regional Challenge er i overensstemmelse med en sådan målsætning, da det repræsenterer et forsøg på at skabe øget konkurrence om midler fra programmet Regional
This was to be achieved through the application of additional criteria specific to the Regional Challenge competition (including private sector leverage and strategic importance for the region as a whole), in addition to the other criteria for project selection.
Man håbede også på at kunne maksimere indflydelsen fra den private sektor og tilskynde til omfattende projekter med regional betydning.
No 4-475/199 grant rates indicated in bids, it also seems to have favoured largescale infrastructure projects over measures benefiting SMEs.
Det ville man opnå gennem anvendelsen af yderligere kriterier, der var særegne for proceduren under Regional Challenge (herunder indflydelse fra den private sektor og strategisk betydning for regionen som helhed), sammen med de øvrige kriterier for projektudvælgelse.
The priority given to projects of strategic regional importance has also worked against more focused, local initiatives, such as those which would normally be funded under community economic development priorities.
Spørgsmål nr. 92 af David Morris (H-0105/96) Om: Regional Udfordring
* Question No 92 by David Morris (H-0105/96) Subject: Regional Challenge
Har Kommissionen foretaget en evaluering af programmet Regional Udfordring i Det Forenede Kongerige, og hvordan agter den i benægtende fald at gøre dette?
Has the Commission undertaken an evaluation of the Regional Challenge schemes in the UK and if not, when and how does the Commission intend to do this?
I nogle regioner foretog de regionale sekretariater en vurdering af forslagene.
In some regions, an assessment of bids was carried out on behalf of the regional secretariats.
Af nogle rapporter fremgik det, at forslagene generelt var af skuffende kvalitet, og at projekterne ofte var ufærdige og kun indeholdt en minimal udspecificering af projektomkostninger.
Some reports suggested that the overall quality of bids was disappointing, noting that projects were often premature and indicated only a minimal breakdown of project costs.
Kritikken gjaldt .især mål 5bområderne, der i mange tilfælde ikke har noget entydigt regionalt midtpunkt, og hvor der ofte var en begrænset koncentration af ressourcer.
Criticisms were focused in Particular on Objective 5b areas, which in many cases have no obvious regional centre, and where there tended to be limited concentration of resources.
Der var derfor generelt en beskeden konkurrence mellem forslag med reel strategisk betydning for sådanne regioner.
Competition between bids of genuine strategic importance to such regions therefore tended to be low.
På et møde mellem Kommissionen og britiske ministre i november i fjor, gik hr. Eggar med til at foretage en evaluering af første runde af programmet Regional Challenge.
At a meeting between the Commission and United Kingdom Ministers in November last year, Mr Eggar agreed to undertake an evaluation of the first round of Regional Challenge.
Det vil medføre en analyse af, om man får valuta for pengene i form af udbytte af de forslag, hvortil der bevilliges støtte, samt en omfattende evaluering af ikke blot de forslag, der tildeles støtte, men også af dem, som tildeles støtte.
This would entail a value-for-money analysis of the outputs of successful bids, and a comprehensive evaluation not only of those bids selected for grant, but also of those that were unsuccessful.
En sådan analyse vil hjælpe Kommissionen med at vurdere, om der er et reelt element af merværdi i programmet Regional Challenge.
Such an analysis would help the Commission in assessing whether there is a genuine value added element to Regional Challenge.
Kommissionen har endnu ikke modtaget denne evaluering.
The Commission has not, as yet, received this evaluation.
Kommissionen foretog en foreløbig analyse af forslagenes økonomiske profiler, men har. endnu ikke modtaget de nødvendige yderligere detaljer vedrørende de projekter, der blev endelig udvalgt.
An initial analysis of the financial profiles of the bids was carried out by the Commission, but it has yet to receive the requisite supplementary details in respect of the projects which were finally selected.
Man regner med, at Kommissionen, når den har modtaget disse oplysninger og evalueringen fra den britiske regering, vil kunne gå i gang med en reel vurdering af første runde med henblik på at forbedre forslagenes kvalitet samt procedurerne for udvælgelse af forslag i anden runde.
It is anticipated that, once this information is received, in addition to the evaluation carried out by the UK Government, the Commission will be able to begin in earnest an assessment of round one with a view to improving both the quality of bids; and the procedures for selecting bids, in round two.
Spørgsmål nr. 93 af Anne Mcintosh (H-0980/95) Om: Dyrevelfærd og det foreslåede forbud mod tremmebokse til kalve
Question No 93 by Anne Mcintosh (H-0980/95) Subject: Animal welfare and the proposed ban on veal crates
Vil Kommissionen forklare, hvorfor det foreslåede forbud mod opdræt af kalve i tremmebokse -som vi hilser velkomment - ikke skal træde i kraft med det samme?
While we welcome the proposed ban on veal crates, could the Commission please explain why the ban will not have immediate effect?
Så fra den 1. januar 2008 skal alle landbrug i Fællesskabet overholde de foreslåede standarder.
1 January 2008 all holdings in the Community have to comply with the proposed standards.
For det andet vælger man den gradvise tilpasning over ti år for at undgå at påføre landmændene ekstra investeringsomkostninger ud over de planlagte.
Secondly, the phasing-out period of ten years is chosen to avoid farmers having to make extra investment costs, because of an earlier investment than was foreseen.
Spørgsmål nr. 94 af Helena Vaz da Silva (H-0987/95)
Question No 94 by Helena Vaz da Silva (H-0987/95)
Om: Indføjelse af en artikel om turisme i EU-traktaten
Subject: Future Treaty provisions on tourism
Kommissionen foreslår i sin grønbog om turisme, at der indføjes en artikel om turisme i EU-traktaten ved den kommende revision som én af de fire mulige metoder til at udvikle turismen i EU.
The Commission states in its Green Paper that a new article on tourism, to be inserted when the Treaties are next revised, is one of four possible ways of promoting tourism in the Community.
Kommissionsmedlemmet slog offentligt til lyd for denne løsning.
The member of the Commission concerned has publicly spoken out in favour of the above option.