natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Han brugte ordene »optagelse af for handlinger inden for en rimelig tidsfrist«.
He used the words 'within a reasonable period we would open negotiations'.
Om Letland sagde han »ved udgangen af 1999«.
In re ferring to Latvia, he said 'at the end of 1999'.
Skal vi fortolke »inden for en rimelig tidsfrist« som værende før eller efter
Are we to interpret 'within a reasonable.period' to be before the end
Perry udgangen af 1999?
Perry of 1999 or after?
Kan han ikke være mere præcis af hensyn til vores forhold til Slovakiet?
Can he not be more precise in the best interests of our relations with Slovakia?
ske lande og Cypern.
Europe and for Cyprus.
Hr. van den Broek præsenterede os for en anden opdeling, og dette er et ret vigtigt spørgsmål. De fem velkendte centralog østeuropæiske lande, nogle andre centralog østeuropæiske lande og derefter en grå zone, hvor Republikken Cypern, som ellers var i den før ste række lande, sættes i gruppe med Tyrkiet, som man i Luxembourg besluttede ikke kunne komme på tale, og Malta, som ikke har ønsket at gå videre med optagelsesprocessen. processen.
Mr van den Broek presented us with a different ranking, and that is important: the five central and eastern European countries, certain other central and eastern European countries, and then a grey area which, in one and the same group, included the Republic of Cyprus which is in the first area, Turkey which was not considered eligible in Luxembourg, and Malta, which has declined to embark on the procedure for accession to the European Union.
van den Broek. - (EN) Med al respekt vil vi ikke anbefale, at der indledes forhandlinger for at bevare et godt po litisk forhold, for det var ikke indholdet af kriterierne fra Det Europæiske Råd i København.
van den Broek. - With due respect, we will not make our recommendations for opening of negotiations in order to maintain good political relations because they were not the Copenhagen criteria.
Som jeg sagde tidligere, vil vi dømme de enkelte lande på deres meritter i forhold til de politiske kriterier, som det var tilfældet i Slovakiet, samt de økonomiske kriterier - både kravene om markedsøkonomi og kravet om konkurrenceevne.
As I said, we will judge on the individual merits of each and every country regarding the political criteria, which was at stake with Slovakia, and the economic criteria - both the market economy require ment and the competitiveness requirement.
Jeg vil derfor spørge hr. van den Broek: Hvordan kan vi anbringe Tyrkiet og Republikken Cypern i den samme kategori?
My question to Mr van den Broek is: how can we put Turkey and the Republic of Cyprus in the same group?
Er der ændringer i forholdet til Tyrkiet og hold ningen til Agenda 2000 og til udvidelsen siden Det Euro pæiske Råd i Luxembourg, hvor der blev opstillet konkrete betingelser for Tyrkiets optagelse?
Has anything changed in relation to Turkey and its attitude to wards Agenda 2000, towards enlargement, since the Luxembourg European Summit when specific conditions were laid down for Turkey?
Hvad angår de perioder, der nævnes i konklusionerne i det sammensatte oversigtsdokument, kan det blive nødvendigt med nogle ændringer, når De har haft lejlighed til at læse dokumentet.
Regarding the periods we have put in the conclusions of the composite paper, some elaboration may be required when you have had an opportunity to read the document.
Vi siger, at med hensyn til en kom mende udvidelse af forhandlingerne ønsker Kommissionen at fremhæve Letlands bemærkelsesværdige frem skridt.
We are saying that with regard to a future extension of negotiations, the Commission wishes to highlight the particular progress made by Latvia.
Hvis Letland fortsætter sine reformer med samme hastighed som hidtil, skulle landet næste år kunne leve op til de økonomiske kriterier fra Det Europæiske Råd i København, og vi vil kunne anbefale en indledning af for handlinger inden udgangen af 1999.
If the momentum of change is maintained it should be possible next year to confirm that Latvia meets the Copenhagen economic criteria and before the end of 1999 to propose the opening of negotiations.
Vi må gøre det klart, at der ikke er tale om en blankocheck.
It must be well understood that this is not a blank cheque.
I det kommende år vil vi kontrollere, om Letland fortsat lever op til de krav, der er beskrevet i rapporten.
Verification will take place during the course of next year as to whether the momentum of change in Latvia that we have broadly described in the report is be ing maintained.
van den Broek. - (EN) Vi tænker ikke i forskellige kategorier.
van den Broek. - We do not think in different categories.
Alle disse lande vil kunne kvalificere sig til at del tage i udvidelsesprocessen.
All these countries would be eligible for enlargement and all form part of an enlargement process.
Sidste år informerede vi om udvidelsesprocessens drift samt om tiltrædelsesprocessen.
We clearly ex plained last year how the enlargement process was operating, and the accession process.
Det drejede sig primært om de lande, vi udtalte os om i fjor.
That notably related to countries for which opinions were made last year.
Som hr. Alvanos sikkert husker, sendte vi i 1993 en lidt anderledes udtalelse til Cypern, fordi landet var længere fremme end de andre ansøgerlande. Der var allerede etableret en markedsøkonomi, og landet er derfor med i forhandlingsprocessen.
Cyprus which, as Mr Alavanos will remember, received an avis in 1993 and did not receive the same kind of opinion as such, has a different kind of preparation than the others because it was further advanced.
Hvad angår Tyrkiet, opfylder landet præcist ønskerne fra Det Europæiske Råd i Luxembourg og Cardiff.
As far as Turkey is concerned, we are complying exactly with the wishes of the European Council of Luxembourg and Cardiff.
Vi udarbejdede derfor en beretning på baggrund af artikel 28 og konklusionerne fra Cardiff, her under vores kommentarer vedrørende fremskridt i den europæiske strategi for Tyrkiet.
So we made a regular report based on Article 28 including conclusions from Cardiff, including our comments on progress in the European strategy for Turkey and so forth.
Der er også gjort store fremskridt i Litauen.
On Lithuania we are saying that considerable progress has also been made.
Der er imidlertid behov for yderligere foranstaltninger, og nogle nye beslutninger skal afprøves i praksis, inden Litauen kan siges at leve op til de økonomiske kriterier fra Det Europæiske Råd i København, således at Kommissionen kan an befale, at der indledes forhandlinger med Litauen.
However, additional measures are needed and some recent decisions by that country need to be tested in practice before it can be considered to have met the Copenhagen economic criteria which would allow the Commission to propose the opening of negotiations.
Vi nævner således forhandlinger og sætter tingene i et klart perspektiv, og i den individuelle rapport har vi beskrevet, hvilke yderligere foranstaltninger der skal til for at ud nytte disse muligheder.
So we are mentioning the negotiations, putting that into a clear perspective and have described in the individual report what further measures need to be taken to have this prospect realised.
Brok (PPE). - (DE) Hr. formand, hvis jeg har forstået Dem rigtigt, hvad angår Slovakiet, skal regeringen have planer efter nyvalget, som, hvis de bliver gennemført, giver mulighed for at indføre demokratiske processer og en retsstat.
Brok (PPE). - (DE) Mr President, if I understood you rightly on Slovakia, you said that following the elections the new government has plans which, if implemented, will offer a chance to introduce democratic processes and the rule of law.
Det er hidtil endnu ikke sket, og det er også alle rede blevet kritiseret.
This has not happened so far, and there has indeed been some criticism in this respect.
Det ville være fint, hvis De ville be kræfte det endnu en gang.
I should be pleased if you could confirm this again.
Er det sådan, at formanden for Kommissionen modtager den slovakiske ministerpræsident på fredag for også at gøre en forskel tydelig over for den hidtidige regering?
Is it the case that the President of the Commission will be receiving the Slovakian Prime Minister on Friday partly in order to mark the difference between this government and the previous one?
Hvad angår Slovakiet, giver den nye situation efter valget også mulighed for at indlede forhandlinger, hvis landets institutioner kan bevare en regulær, stabil og demokratisk funktion.
Finally, on Slovakia, the new situation created following the election also allows for the prospect of opening negotiations on condition that the regular stable and democratic functioning of its institutions are confirmed.
Det skal bekræftes.
This will need to be verified.
Inden vi kan indlede for handlinger med Slovakiet, skal vi også have bekræftet, at Slovakiet har truffet de nødvendige foranstaltninger for at rette op på den økonomiske situation, og at der er skabt større gennemsigtighed i driften af landet.
It will also be necessary before opening negotiations to verify that Slovakia has under taken measures to correct the economic situation and that it has introduced greater transparency in its operation.
Hvorfor siger vi det?
Why do we say that?
Fordi man under den forrige regering kunne sige, at den lovgivningsmæssige del af et markedsøkonomisk system var på plads, men at der var stor indblanding fra staten samt manglende gennemsigtighed, specielt i for bindelse med privatiseringsprocessen.
It is because under the previous government one could say that the legislative part of a market economic system was in place but that there was heavy state intervention and a lack of transparency, notably in the way the privatisation process was being carried out.
Den nye regering har allerede tilkendegivet, at den ønsker at rette op på disse forhold, men vi er nødt til at kontrollere resultaterne, inden vi på baggrund af kriterierne fra Det Europæiske Råd i København kan anbefale, at der indledes forhandlinger med landet.
This new government has already made known that it wants to change that but the effects must be verified be fore we are able, on the basis of the objective Copenhagen criteria, to recommend the opening of negotiations.
Vi sætter dette i perspektiv, og man kan ikke misforstå det politiske signal i denne konklusion.
We clearly put this into perspective and the political signal from this conclusion cannot be misunderstood.
Alavanos (GUE/NGL). - (EL) Hr. formand jeg har lyttet opmærksomt til hr. van den Broeks redegørelse.
Alavanos (GUE/NGL). - (EL) Mr President, I listened very carefully to what Mr van den Broek had to say.
Og først og fremmest er jeg overrasket over den måde, han opdelte landene på.
First of all, I am confused about the ranking he applied.
Jeg vidste, at der var en gruppe på seks prioriterede ansøgerlande, nemlig de centralog østeuropæi
I knew that there was a group of six countries applying for accession, with priority for the countries of central and eastern
Han skal selvfølgelig have en vis tid til at gennemføre de nødvendige foranstaltninger.
He will of course need a certain time for implementation.
Nr. 4-527/9 van den Broek ser allerede, at Kommissionen ønsker at fremskynde EU's institutionelle reformproces mest muligt.
No 4-527/9 van den Broek closely monitor those developments and when we feel the criteria for the opening of negotiations as such have been fulfilled - and here I am thinking especially of the political ones, but also a number of economic ones - we will recommend the opening of negotiations.
også på en række økonomiske kriterier - vil vi anbefale, at der indledes forhandlinger.
That is the clearcut message for the Prime Minister of Slovakia.
Pasty (UPE). - (FR) Dette møde er en smule kaotisk, men jeg håber ikke, at selve udvidelsesprocessen er kaotisk. Jeg vil i den sammenhæng stille to korte spørgsmål.
Decisions have not been taken yet but it shows already that the Commission wants to accelerate as much as possible and, insofar as it has influence, the process of institutional re form of the EU itself.
Barón Crespo (PSE). - (ES) Hr. formand, Kommissionen har ændret synsvinkel vedrørende fremgangsmåden i forbindelse med forordningen om koordinering af førtiltrædelsesinstrumenterne.
Barón Crespo (PSE). - (ES) Mr President, the Commission has changed its approach with regard to the arrangements for coordination of the pre-accession instruments.
Mine spørgsmål er for det før ste: Hvad er årsagerne til dette?
I should like to ask, firstly, for what reasons it has done so?
Og for det andet: Medfører det ikke, at alle bestræbelser centreres om Phare-pro-grammet?
And secondly, does this not mean that all the efforts will be concentrated on the PHARE programme?
Men jeg vil gerne vide, hvordan situationen er for Estland.
Firstly, we have been told that Latvia could be included in the first wave, but what about Estonia?
Estland er med i første række, men har landet gjort tilstrækkelige fremskridt i behandlingen af det russiske mindretal, og er Letland ikke ved at over hale Estland på dette område?
Estonia is already part of the first wave but has it made sufficient progress in the treatment of its Russian-speaking minority and is Latvia not now overtaking Estonia in this respect?
Andet spørgsmål: Kommissæren blev afbrudt for et øje blik siden, men hvordan er situationen for Bulgarien og Rumænien?
Secondly, the Commissioner was interrupted at this point, but what about Bulgaria and Romania?
Hvis jeg har forstået det korrekt, er vi ved at gå fra en udvidelsesproces med seks plus fem til en udvidelsesproces med seks plus, måske tre, plus to, og de to udstødte er Bulgarien og Rumænien.
Am I right in thinking that we are moving from a process of six plus five to a process of six plus possibly three, plus two, and that the two excluded are Bulgaria and Romania?
van den Broek. - (EN) Jeg er ikke sikker på, at jeg for står, hvad det ærede medlem mener med at »ændre proceduren«.
van den Broek. - I am not sure I understand what the honourable Member means by 'changing the approach'.
Jeg kender ikke noget til ændrede procedurer.
I am not aware of changing any approach.
Når vi taler om koordinering af førtiltrædelsesinstrumenter, drejer det sig om ændringerne i tiden efter år 2000, hvor vi vil have flere midler til rådighed, hvis budgetmyndighederne accepterer det.
When we talk about the coordination of pre-accession instruments, that has to do with the changes that will take place from the year 2000 onwards when, subject to approval by the budgetary authority, we will have more financial means at our disposal.
Det ved hr. Barón Crespo.
Mr Barón Crespo will be aware of this.
Vi skal koordinere alle de forskellige instrumenter, der underbygger forberedelsen af ansøgerlandenes tiltrædelse.
We will have to coordinate all the various instruments that underpin the preparation for accession in the candidate countries.
Jeg ved, at der er nogen debat i Rådet om de bestemmelser, vi har foreslået, men jeg håber, at vi kan drage de nødvendige konklusioner i den nærmeste fremtid.
I know there is some discussion going on in the Council regarding the regulations we have proposed in this respect but I hope that conclusions can be drawn in the very near future.
Jeg tror ikke, at det har nogen politisk betydning.
I do not think it has a political connotation. tation.
Frygter I ikke, at denne fremgangsmåde vil medføre al vorlige indenrigspolitiske problemer i de to lande, som på en måde er fuldstændig tilsidesat, selvom vi tilbyder dem førtiltrædelsesaftaler? Jeg tror, at vi risikerer at destabilisere disse to lande politisk.
Are you not concerned that this approach may pose serious internal policy problems within these two countries which will find themselves completely sidelined, even though pre-accession instruments are being proposed?
Men ser Kommissionen måske en fare for for handlingerne og den snarlige tiltrædelse på grund af De res forslag i protokollen om en udvidelse i tillægget til Amsterdam-traktaten og på grund af den kendsgerning, at der ikke er sket nogen fremskridt i forbindelse med de institutionelle reformer i EU?
But in the light of its pro posals in the protocol on enlargement annexed to the Am sterdam Treaty, and of the fact that no progress has been made with the institutional reform of the European Union, does the Commission not perhaps see a risk to the negotiations and to early accession?
Hvad gør Kommissionen som motor for integrationen for hurtigt at fremskynde disse spørgsmål og en institutionel reform i EU og for dermed også at lave sine lektier?
What is the Commission doing, as the motive force of integration, in order to bring about rapid progress on these questions and on institutional reform in the European Union, which is part of its own domestic responsibilities?
van den Broek. - (EN) På baggrund af de principper, der blev accepteret i fjor i Agenda 2000, er det fortsat muligt, at et land kan overhale et andet i tiltrædelsesforberedelserne.
van den Broek. - On the basis of the principles accepted last year in Agenda 2000, it remains possible that one country will overtake another in the preparations.
Jeg siger ikke, at det er tilfældet med Estland og Letland.
I am not saying that is the case between Estonia and Latvia.
Letland er endnu ikke på forhandlingsstadiet, skønt der som tidligere nævnt er sket betydelige frem skridt og er visse perspektiver.
Latvia is not at the negotiating stage yet although, as I said earlier, very significant progress has been made and there is a perspective.
Men Letland har gjort større fremskridt end Estland i spørgsmålet om den russisktalende minoritet.
But where Latvia has made more progress than Estonia is in the matter of the Russian-speaking minority.
Jeg nævnte tidligere den nyligt af holdte folkeafstemning i Letland, hvor man vedtog loven om statsborgerskab og dermed gjorde det lettere at opnå statsborgerskab, samtidig med at man forbedrede situationen for statsløse børn.
I referred to the recent referendum in Latvia where this matter - notably of facilitating the naturalisation process and also improving the situation of stateless children - was approved.
Der mangler fortsat at blive ved taget en lovgivning i Estland.
There is still legislation to be adopted in Estonia.
Hvad angår Bulgarien og Rumænien, ønskede jeg ikke at gemme dem af vejen.
As far as Bulgaria and Romania are concerned, it was not my intention to put them behind any kind of curtain.
I mine noter til dagens indlæg står der, at Bulgarien har gjort store fremskridt, men at landet starter et stykke efter mange af de øvrige ansøgerlande.
It was in my speaking notes that I was not able to complete at an earlier stage to say that Bulgaria has made significant progress but comes from further back than a number of other candidate countries.
Vi er derfor positivt overraskede over den bulgarske regering, der på mange områder yder en prisværdig indsats.
So we are very much encouraged by what the Bulgarian Government is doing which is laudable in many respects.
Jeg kan desværre ikke være lige så entusiastisk i mine ud talelser om Rumænien, skønt jeg vil skynde mig at sige, at den nuværende regering og specielt premierministeren selv har konkluderet, at reformerne er forsinket i Rumænien.
Unfortunately, I cannot be that enthusiastic about Romania, although I hasten to add that the present government, and especially the present Prime Minister, have concluded themselves that there is a delay in the reforms in Romania.
Vi arbejder tæt sammen med myndighederne i Rumænien, herunder de internationale penge-og finansieringsinstitutter, i et forsøg på atter at få motoren op i fulde omdrejninger.
We are working very closely together with the authorities there, including the international financial institutions, to try to get the engine run ning at full speed again.
Endelig ved De udmærket, at da Agenda 2000 blev præsenteret i fjor, refererede Kommissionen til Amsterdam traktaten, og den foretrak at afholde hele den institutio nelle debat på en regeringskonference inden den første udvidelse og inden tiltrædelsen af de første nye medlems stater. Der er endnu ikke truffet beslutninger, men det vi
van den Broek. - It is quite right that while we are talking now about what we wish the candidate countries to do in preparation for membership, that in no way discharges our Member States from making progress in the EU's own reform. This is embedded in everything that has to do with Agenda 2000, including proposals for policy change, institutional change and the whole of the financial framework.
Titley (PSE). - (EN) Kommissær van den Broek startede med at sige, at han ville aflægge rapport om de 12 ansøgerlande. Kan man deraf konkludere, at Kommissionen betragter Tyrkiet som et ansøgerland og ikke et potentielt ansøgerland?
One thing we want to try to avoid is that where we urge the Member States to make progress with Agenda 2000 - and we have made the proposals for that - we should not threaten the candidate countries and under mine their confidence by saying we are taking into account some delays in the European Union not to move them forward towards negotiations or to make progress with the screening etc.
Har Kommissionen fortolket Cardiff-topmødet derhen, at Tyrkiet er et ansøgerland?
You are quite right that things have to be balanced, that the EU Member States and the Commission have to take their own responsibilities and try to keep in step.
Dernæst vil jeg gerne spørge, om denne rapport har fået Kommissionen til at henstille til, at man ændrer på førtiltrædelsesstøtten for at styrke indsatsen på et område frem for et andet.
Can one conclude therefore that the Commission views Turkey as a candidate coun try, not a potential candidate country? Has it interpreted the Cardiff Summit as meaning that Turkey is a candidate country?
Jeg vil gerne benytte lejligheden til at tilføje et vigtigt punkt, nemlig sidste års forhandlinger med Europa-Parlamentet om de deltagende og de ikkedeltagende lande.
Secondly, may I ask if this report has led the Commission to make any recommendations to change the format of pre-accession aid in order to strengthen the work in one area as opposed to another area?
Endelig finder jeg det forkert at sige, at Letland kan ind lede forhandlinger ved udgangen af 1999.
Finally, to say that Latvia can begin negotiations at the end of 1999 is rather strange.
Hvis Letland er parat, er det parat nu, og hvis ikke det er parat, må det af vente den næste rapport om et år.
If Latvia is ready, it is ready now; if it is not ready, it needs to wait until the next report next year.
Er det ikke farligt at sige, at vi vil indlede forhandlinger om 12 måneder?
Is it not rather dangerous to say that we will open negotiations in 12 months' time?
Det efterlader mange i skæbnens vold.
You will find this in the composite paper which I hope will reach you today.
van den Broek. - (EN) Tyrkiet er kvalificeret.
van den Broek. - Turkey is considered as eligible.
Jeg vil ikke nægte, at der er en meget interessant ideologisk debat om, hvorvidt Tyrkiet skal kaldes ansøgerland eller ej.
I do not deny that there is a very interesting ideological debate about the question as to whether it should be called a can didate or not.
Som kommissær med ansvar for forholdet til Tyrkiet ved jeg præcist, hvordan denne sag skal håndteres.
As the Commissioner responsible for relations with Turkey I know exactly how to treat the dossier.
Der frem går klart af konklusionerne fra Luxembourg og Cardiff, og den europæiske strategi for Tyrkiet er helt entydig, hvad angår forberedelserne til medlemskab.
That has been enumerated both by the Luxembourg and Cardiff conclusions and the European strategy for Turkey is perfectly clear with all that it implies for preparation of membership.
Det seneste år har for det første vist - og jeg vil rose Par lamentet for at have opfordret os til at følge disse procedurer - at forskellen mellem disse to grupper er reduceret betydeligt.
Firstly, the past year has clearly shown - and I give credit to Parliament for having urged us to follow those procedures - that the difference between those two groups has been greatly reduced.