natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Også her i mødesalen forholder det sig sådan, at såfremt et medlem overskrider nogle grænser, kalder formanden ham til orden.
I believe this because, here in Parliament too, when a Member steps over the line, the President calls him or her to order.
Ingen af os har absolut frihed til at sige, hvad vi har lyst til, når vi har indtaget vore pladser i mødesalen.
None of us has absolute freedom - when we are seated in this House - to say anything we please.
Vi har ikke absolut frihed til at angribe den eller den regering i injurierende termer.
We are not completely free to attack this or that government using language that could be slanderous.
Vi er underlagt reglerne om parlamentarisk høflighed, og det er mødeformandens pligt at sørge for, at disse regler overholdes.
We are subject to the rules of parliamentary courtesy which the President, in turn, must enforce.
GOLLNISCH (DR). - (FR) Hr. formand, De nævnte i listen over uopsættelige emner spørgsmålet om sikker hedsseler i busser.
PRESIDENT. - Mr Galland, I am sure you have noticed that I did not agree either.
Jeg vil gerne have, at Parlamentet, inden det eventuelt udtaler sig om dette spørgsmåls uopsættelighed, hører Kommissionens synspunkt.
If everyone now wants to object to points of order by individual Members, the number of speakers will increase considerably.
I går sagde hr. Jacques Delors nemlig i fjernsynsudsendelsen
I would therefore ask you to refrain from making comments which do not relate to the business of the House.
Han kan desværre ikke være til stede og har derfor bedt mig læse den ordlyd op, han havde forberedt.
Unfortunately, he could not be here, so he asked me to read the text that he had prepared.
Jeg vil nu læse den op for Dem.
I am therefore going to read this text.
Et medlem, der udtaler sig uden for Parlamentet, har samme retssikkerhed som enhver anden borger, den sikkerhed, der ligger i upartiske domstole, som dømmer i overens stemmelse med loven.
In that case, that would not be what we in Spanish call immunity, but rather what we call impunity - and impunity is something that no Member of Parliament should have.
Ved at fremsætte de bemærkninger, man bebrejder hr. Le Pen, forfulgte han et præcist mål: at blive trukket for retten for at få omtale og endnu en gang blive politisk martyr.
By uttering the words for which he is being reproached, Mr Le Pen had a clear objective in mind: to have himself taken to court so that people would talk about him and so that once again he could play the political martyr.
Den glæde vil jeg ikke gøre ham.
I do not want to give him this pleasure.
Jeg vil ikke oven i købet tilslutte mig enigheden blandt dem, som gerne vil give sig selv god samvittighed ved at foregive, at de har glemt, at det yderste højre ikke kæmper i retslokalet, men på det sociale område.
Nor do I wish to join the chorus of those who would like to keep their consciences clear by pretending to forget that the far right does not fight in court, but in the social field.
Grobunden for det yderste højre er de sociale uligheder, fattigdommen og de arbejderfamilier, der gemmes væk i elendige forstadskvarterer uden sociale eller kulturelle faciliteter, hvad enten det er familier af europæisk eller anden oprindelse.
The compost of the far right is social inequality, poverty and working class families dumped in dilapidated suburbs with no social or cultural facilities - regardless of whether or not these families are of European origin.
Den eneste måde, hvorpå det yderste højre kan trænges tilbage, består i en bekæmpelse af udstødelsen.
The only way of forcing back the far right is to fight forms of exclusion.
Det er dér, man venter på de ledende.
This is what we expect the people in government to do.
At stemme for en ophævelse af den parlamentariske immunitet ville være en tilfredsstillelse både for hr. Le Pen og for dem, som havde magten i går eller får den i dag og som foregiver at være imod det, han står for.
Voting to waive parliamentary immunity would mean satisfying Mr Le Pen and those who were in power yesterday, or who are assuming it today, and who claim to oppose what he represents.
Den hopper jeg ikke på.
I do not want to fall into this trap.
Derfor vil jeg ikke deltage i afstemningen, fordet ville være at deltage i en maskerade.
This is why I will not take part in the vote, so I do not have to take part in such a masquerade.
Sådanne generelle kriterier blev fastsat.
What I am saying is that there must be limits. So, what must these limits be?
Og anvendelsen af dem har nogle gange medført afvisning af anmodningen om ophævelse af immuniteten, også i hr. Le Pens tilfælde, og andre gange, som det er tilfældet i den aktuelle sag, fører de til den modsatte konklusion.
These criteria were fixed. And once these criteria were applied on a general basis, they sometimes supported the refusal of requests, as in the case of Mr Le Pen, and they sometimes - as in this case here - led to the opposite.
For disse kriterier indebærer, at der ikke straffrit kan fremsættes injurier.
For what these criteria say, Mr President, is that one cannot indulge in defamation.
Ét er politisk kritik, noget andet er politiske injurier.
Political criticism is one thing, but political defamation is quite another.
GOLLNISCH (DR). - (FR) Hvad er det, der i dag bebrejdes hr. Le Pen?
GOLLNISCH (DR). - (FR) What is Mr Le Pen being reproached for today?
Det bebrejdes ham, at han på et valgmøde omtalte regeringen som tyveknægte, pengeafpressere og gangstere.
He is being reproached for having talked about the government using the terms thief, racketeer and gangster during an electoral meeting.
Med disse ord gjorde hr. Le Pen ikke andet end at oversætte det, som straffeloven fordømmer, til amindeligt sprog, som udmærket kan anvendes på den af den socialistiske regering organiserede uredelige forvaltning i forbindelse med sagerne vedrørende SAGES og URBA-GRACCO, disse spøgelseskonsulentfirmaer, som udskrev fakturaer på fiktive ydelser til socialistisk styrede kommuner, så at de valgte fra socialistpartiet kunne nyde godt af disse besvigelser. Men alt dette er velkendt i Frankrig!
By using these words, Mr Le Pen was merely translating into everyday language something which is condemned by the penal code. They are perfectly applicable to the misappropriation of funds organized by the Socialist Party within the framework of the cases involving SAGES and URBA-GRACCO, two fictitious consulting firms who sent phoney bills to socialist-controlled communes so that the party representatives could benefit from these misappropriations.
Hr. formand, da jeg i lang tid har levet under et autoritært diktatur, ved jeg af erfaring, hvad politiske injurier kan føre til.
Mr President, as someone who lived for a long time in a country under an authoritarian dictatorship, I know full well just how far political slander can go.
Ligesom jeg ved, at denne taktik med i tide og utide at fremsætte injurier og miskreditere de politiske institutioner ikke er en demokratisk taktik.
It is a tactic that has always been used by those who oppose democracy, something which found its greatest expression in the 1930s among the fascists and Nazis.
Der er endvidere korruptionsordbogen, hvis forfatter ikke blev retsforfulgt!
This is the dictionary of corruption, yet its author was not taken to court!
Læs artiklen om URBA-GRACCO, hr. Defraigne, den er god at få forstand af! Så er der bogen »Le racket politique« af hr. Justiniani, den indledes med sætningen: »J'étais racketteur pour le parti socialiste\« (Jeg var afpresser for socialistpartiet.)
Look at the article on URBA-GRACCO, Mr Defraigne, and you will learn something!
Læs den, hr. Defraigne!
See for yourself, Mr Defraigne!
Der er en anden bog om afpresning.
Here is another book on racketeering.
En bog af den politimand, der ledede undersøgelsen; hans navn er Goudino og han er netop blevet genansat i det franske politi!
This is the book by the policeman placed in charge of the inquiry, Mr Goudino, who has just been readmitted to the French police force!
Så er der protesten fra undersøgelsesdommeren, hr. Gallo, jeg kunne have have medbragt et helt bibliotek til Dem bare om dette emne.
Here is the protest from the examining magistrate, Mr Gallo. I could have brought you an entire library on this subject.
Der er mange måder, hvorpå der kan udøves politisk kritik inden for rammerne af den nødvendige urbane tone, der må være ledende for den politiske debat.
There are many ways of engaging in political criticism while remaining within the bounds of the required courtesy that must always be present in any political debate. There is no need to resort to slander.
Det er ikke nødvendigt at fremsætte injurier.
Slander is not democratic; it is anti-democratic.
På denne baggrund anmoder jeg medlemmerne om at stemme for min anbefaling af at ophæve hr. Le Pens parlamentariske immunitet. tet.
The planning of these operations, which used many operators, constitutes what the penal code calls an 'association of criminals', in other words a 'gang', which naturally implies gangsters!
ODDY (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, undskyld, at jeg afbryder forhandlingen.
ODDY (PSE). - Mr President, I apologise for interrupting the debate.
Jeg havde bedt om ordet tidligere.
I had asked for the floor earlier on.
Jeg vil blot gerne bekræfte det, Christine Crawley sagde, om at bilkomponentvirksomheden Magneti Marelli mister 300 arbejdspladser.
I would just like to confirm the points made by my colleague, Christine Crawley, about the Magneti Marelli car components firm losing 300 jobs.
Jeg vil også udbede mig en udtalelse fra Kommissionen.
I too would like a statement from the Commission.
GOLLNISCH spist varme måltider i Frankrig - og jeg synes, at det er på tide, at hr. Le Pen forstod, at hans filosofi er præget af negativitet og en fortvivlelsens udvej, som vi kan undvære. re.
GOLLNISCH ment of the French Republic. Forthose reasons I think Mr Le Pen should stand trial back in France.
Méhaignerie, vil tage de syvmilestøvler på, som den store ærværdige mand, der undertegnede anklagen, bar, nemlig hr. Nallet, justitsminister i den socialistiske regering, kasserer i socialistpartiet og derfor den hovedskyldige, den hovedtiltalte i disse sager.
I want to conclude on one point. We have had Mr Le Pen before us so many times - it seems to me that we have had more reports about Mr Le Pen that I have enjoyed hot dinners in France - and it is about time that Mr Le Pen understood that his is a philosophy of negativity and a counsel of despair which we could do without.
VANDEMEULEBROUCKE (ARC). - (NL) Hr. for mand, en bemærkning til forretningsordenen.
solidarity, namely governmental solidarity that is at the heart of all parliamentary democracies.
Jeg ved præcis, hvad der skete i forbindelse med attentatet på mig. Dette var ikke det første, men det tredje attentat.
What is stupefying for the time being are the intellectual and moral contortions made by the members of the committee.
Der var to attentater på mit hjem i forbindelse med hormonmafiaen.
You, Mr Gil Robles, targeted slanderous remarks made in parliaments, or outside them - remarks under which your country, you said, has suffered greatly.
Jeg var i Bratislava, dengang der fandt et attentat sted, jeg var således ikke hjemme, dengang det første attentat fandt sted.
I think that you are naturally referring to the words of Dolores I Barrouri, aimed at deputy Calvo Sotelo, unless you have a strangely selective memory.
Den måde, hvorpå De nu forelægger sagerne, hr. Dillen, finder jeg umoralsk, og jeg havde aldrig ventet noget sådant af Dem.
You have cynically violated your two principles - the fumus perseculionis, the taint of persecution.
Jeg vil alligevel gerne sige følgende: i denne sag foreligger to anonyme breve og et vidnesbyrd elleve dage efter det skete.
This is the sixth request made here against Mr Le Pen by the French government and you have still not detected the smell!
De burde udmærket vide hvad man gør med anonyme breve, hr. Dillen.
Surely, you must have a plugged up nose if you cannot smell the fetid odour of the misappropriations of the socialist party.
Jeg ønsker ikke at lade mig belære afeen, der ikke har gidet røre en finger i denne sag.
Then there is the protection of parliament ary expression.
Vi fik her i aften et ret godt eksempel på sofisteri.
This was not the first, but the third attack.
Jeg tror, at De helt naturligt henviste til bemærkningerne af Dolores Ibarruri om parlamentsmedlemmet Calvo Sotelo, medmindre De har en særdeles selektiv hukommelse.
I consider the way in which you, Mr Dillen, presented matters just now as immoral, and I would never have expected something like that of you.
De har kynisk krænket Deres to principper, fumus persecutionis, forfølgelsens lugt.
I would also like to tell you this: this dossier contains two anonymous letters and a statement made 11 days after the event.
Det er det sjette søgsmål, den franske regering her rejser mod hr. Le Pen, og De har ikke mærket lugten!
You, Mr Dillen, should be most familiar with what one does with anonymous letters.
Deres næse må være stoppet, siden De ikke mærker stanken fra socialistpartiets besvigelser.
I do not want to have to take any lessons from someone who has not lifted a finger with regard to this dossier.
Endelig er der beskyttelsen af den parlamentariske ytringsfrihed. Den gælder, når det drejer sig om at beskytte det socialistiske medlem, hr. Kostopoulos, men den kan selvfølgelig ikke beskytte parlamentsmedlem Le Pen.
I know what I have been through this last year, so try and put yourself in my shoes, and try just for once to take the right responsibility rather than finding racism more important than the matter I am concerned with.
Mod Le Pen er alt i orden, alt er tilladt.
(Interruption by the President)
HARRISON (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, hr. Gollnisch nævnte ordet fidusmager, og det er altid til stor morskab for mig, at det er de enkelte medlemmer af De Europæ iske Højrepartiers Tekniske Gruppe, der kender alle de parlamentariske fiduser bedst, når de råber og skriger og skælder os ud, som hr. Gollnisch netop har gjort.
HARRISON (PSE). - Mr President, Mr Gollnisch men tioned the word racketeer, and it is always of great amusement to me that it is individual members of the Technical Group of the European Right who make the greatest racket in this European Parliament when they shout and berate us precisely as Mr Gollnisch has done.
De er jo den eneste gruppe, der klapper af sig selv - faktisk som om de er helt klar over, at det, de siger, er det rene sludder, og det har aldrig været bevist klarere end her i aften.
Indeed, they are the only group which applaud them selves - as though in fact fully aware that what they say is utter tosh, and no better illustration has been given than this evening.
DILLEN (DR). - (NL)Hr. formand, jeg talte om det sidste såkaldte attentat.
DILLEN (DR). - (NL) Mr President, I was talking about the last so-called attack.
Jeg kan vel gå ud fra, at anklage myndigheden i Brugge ikke er racist.
The Bruges public prosecutor is, I assume, no racist.
Hr. Vandemeulebroucke anklager mig med urette herfor, men jeg har altid opfattet fornærmelser fra hans side og fra hans parti som æresbevisninger.
Mr Vandemeulebroucke is unjustly accusing me ofthat, but I have always interpreted insults from him and his party as signs of respect.
Jeg talte således om det sidste attentat, og afgørelsen fra den belgiske justitsminister og fra anklagemyndigheden i Brugge er klar: der var ikke tale om noget attentat.
Anyway, I was talking about the latest attack, and the statement by the Belgian Minister of Justice and the Bruges public prosecutor is clear: There was no question of any attack.
I øvrigt vil jeg slutte med det, jeg just sagde.
As for the rest, I will conclude by repeating what I said before.
Hvis vor kollega Vandemeulebroucke efter denne moralske afstraffelse fra anklagemyndighed og minister fortsat holder fast på sin fantasiversion, så opstår spørgsmålet, om vi skal føle foragt eller medlidenhed med dette.
If Mr Vandemeulebroucke persists in sticking to his fantasy version of what happened after this moral reprimand by the public prosecutor and the minister, then the question arises as to whether we should hold him in contempt or pity him.
DEFRAIGNE (LDR). - (FR) Hr. formand, en personlig bemærkning, eftersom hr. Gollnisch to gange nævnte mit navn i sit indlæg.
DEFRAIGNE (LDR). - (FR) Mr President, I would like to speak for personal reasons since Mr Gollnisch men tioned my name twice in his speech.
Jeg vil gerne sige, at jeg er meget enig i hr. Gil-Robles betænkning, og det han som spanier sagde til en britte som mig om betydningen af at forsvare demokratiet.
Could I say how much I agree with Mr Gil Robles' report and what he, as a Spaniard, said to a Brit like me about the importance of defending democracy.
Jeg ved fra hr. Gil-Robles egen personlige historie, at han er kendt for at forsvare demokratiet på første hånd.
I know from Mr Gil-Robles' own personal history that he is known for defending democracy first-hand.
Han har faktisk haft fascismens 'døde hånd' på sin og kollegernes skulder.
He has actually had the 'dead hand' of fascism laid upon him and his colleagues.
Så jeg mener, det sømmer sig at lytte, når en klog mand som hr. Gil-Robles taler og når frem til et meget velovervejet synspunkt, og vi bør lytte til hans råd om, at hr. Le Pens immunitet bør ophæves.
So I think it behoves us to listen when a wise man like Mr Gil-Robles speaks and comes to a very judicious view and we should pay heed to his advice that Mr Le Pen's immunity should indeed be waived.
Og hvis der er én ting, jeg er sikker på, er det følgende -at i årenes løb, når vi har forsøgt at nå frem til en forståelse af dette spørgsmål gennem Donnez-betænk-ningen og andre betænkninger, har vi lært, at hver af os som medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet bør behandles på samme måde som vore nationale parlamentsmedlemmer.
And if I am persuaded of one thing, it is this - that through the years when we have tried to seek some form of understanding of this issue through the Donnez Report and further reports, what we do know to be the case is that each of us, as MEPs, should be treated in the same way as our national MPs.
I så tilfælde er immuniteten under fransk lovgivning svarende til den i det nationale parlament.
So in that case, under French law, immunity is enjoyed in the same way as in the national parliament.
Ifølge fransk lovgivning er det ikke korrekt at gå rundt og kalde folk tyve og fidusmagere og gangstere.
Under French law, it is not correct that you can go around calling people thieves and racketeers and, indeed, gangsters.
Det går ud over grænsen for politisk kritik og angriber den franske regerings integritet.
That goes beyond the limits of political criticism and indeed attacks the integrity of the govern
Der er endnu et aspekt.
Mr Gollnisch invited me to learn something.
I sagen Kostopoulos var der tale om begreberne løgnere og tyve.
I did not wait for his request to read the book by Mr Goudino, which was published two years ago.
Som jeg forklarede udvalget, er vi alle tyve, og det sker også for os, at vi af og til siger ting, som ikke er i overensstemmelse med virkeligheden.
I would simply like to say that when Mr Gollnisch makes a long speech to explain to us that Mr Le Pen was right to call the socialist government 'racketeers' and 'gangsters', he is tackling the very substance of the problem.
Derfra at gå over til udtrykkene gangstere og pengeafpressere er der, hr. Gollnisch, en nuance, som De næppe er i stand til at fatte. Læs derfor, læs de franske
In actual fact, he is asking us to play the role that should be played by the French courts, for it is a French court that will say whether or not Mr Le Pen was right to feel that the socialists and the government were racketeers or gangs ters.
Der er et punkt, jeg gerne vil afslutte med. Vi har overvejet hr. Le Pen mange gange - det forekommer mig, at vi har haft flere betænkninger om Le Pen, end jeg har
Under these conditions, I think that there is good cause to waive parliamentary immunity in order to allow all relevant explanations to be made where they should be made.
DEFRAIGNE ordbøger. Der findes mange lige fra »Le Grand Robert« til »Connaissance de la langue française« over Hachette, Larousse og alle de andre.
So, learn something yourself.
Tag dem med, de er gode at få forstand af.
Take them with you. You might learn something.
FORMANDEN. - Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
The vote will be taken on Wednesday at 12 noon.
Afstemningen finder sted onsdag kl. 12.00.
In my report, I make a number of proposals.
Forbindelser mellem Unionen og Europarådet
Relations between the Union and the Council of Europe
FORMANDEN. - Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok. A3-408/93) af Dury for Udvalget om Udenrigs- og Sikkerhedsanliggender om forbindelserne mellem Unionen og Europarådet.
PRESIDENT. - The next item is the report by Mrs Dury on behalf of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and Security (A3-408/93) on relations between the European Union and the Council of Europe.
En anden vigtig ting: vi gør opmærksom på, at Parlamentet gentagne gange har anmodet om tiltrædelse af den europæiske menneskerettighedskonvention.
Another important thing is this: We would like to reiterate that on several occasions Parliament has asked for the Union's accession to the European Convention on Human Rights.
Jeg mener, det er vigtigt, at Fællesskabet som sådant, der er en juridisk enhed, på den måde kan sikre en bedre beskyttelse af EF-borgerens rettigheder.
I think it is important that the Community, as a legal entity, can ensure that the rights of Community citizens are better protected.
Det er en meget vigtig side af opbygningen af Europa.
This is a very important aspect of European integration.
Men vi går videre - og her får jeg støtte fra Udenrigsudvalget - idet vi kræver, at Unionens organer skal deltage i Europarådets arbejde.
Yet we are going further - and here I was supported by the Commit tee on Foreign Affairs and Security - because we are asking for the participation of the bodies of the Union in the work of the Council of Europe.
Vi ønsker, at Unionen som sådan skal deltage i Europarådets arbejde.
We would like the Union itself to participate in the work of the Council of Europe.
Vi opfordrer derfor Kommissionen til at udarbejde forslag til Fællesskabets tiltrædelse af Europarådets statut.
We are therefore asking the Commission to forward proposals to this end so that the Community accedes to the Statute of the Council of Europe.
Det ville uden tvivl konsolidere den nye balance i Europa og gøre det muligt for landene i Mellem- og Østeuropa at få privilegerede forbindelser med os gen nem vor egen tiltrædelse af Europarådet.
That would undoubtedly reinforce the new equilibrium in Europe and would allow the countries of central and eastern Europe to have preferential links with us via our own accession to the Council of Europe.
Jeg gentager, at det for øjeblikket er utænkeligt med tiltrædelser på kort sigt.
I repeat: At present it is inconceivable to imagine accession for anyone in the short term.
Til gengæld er vi udmærket klar over, hvor nødvendigt samarbejdet med disse lande er.
On the other hand, we know full well just how necessary cooperation with these countries is.
Derfor kræver vi, at Kommissionen udarbejder forslag om vor tiltrædelse af Europarådet.
This is why we are insisting that the Commission draft proposals with a view to our accession to the Council of Europe.
Endelig mener vi, at Unionen skal være permanent repræsenteret i Europarådet og alle dets organer, således som det er tilfældet i FN, ved FAO, UNESCO og i andre organisationer som f.eks. OECD.
Lastly, we think that the Union should be permanently represented in the Council of Europe and all its bodies, as is the case in the United Nations, the FAO, UNESCO and other organizations, such as the OECD.