natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I og med at folk bevæger sig over grænserne i højere grad end før. er det nødvendigt al effektivisere det retlige samarbejde. Unionens borgere må kunne regne med at nyde den samme retssikkerhed, uanset hvilket medlemsland de befinder sig i.
Instead of being a transitional phase in the process of extending Community responsibilities, the third pillar has become a sphere of action for the Member States, and they are active even in areas in which the Community Institutions have competence.
Jeg har derfor indbudt en gruppe eksperter til en drøftelse.
I should like to hear the Council's view on this.
Det er noget naturligt, der sker, uanset om de asylsøgende har midlertidige eller permanente opholdstilladelser.
And then, of course, I also agree with other parliamentarians on the veto.
Der er allerede indledt en omfattende tilbagevenden til Bosnien.
This naturally blocks progress on decision making.
Jeg opfordrede til tilbageholdenhed, indtil udviklingen i nogen grad havde stabiliseret sig.
A prime example of this is the question of Gibraltar which is holding up the agreement on our external borders.
Desuden pegede jeg på, at det var nødvendigt at foretage en generel analyse af, hvordan fredsaftalen i Dayton ville påvirke det fremtidige indvandringspres fra Bosnien.
How do you explain that to Europe's voters and citizens?
Der er store gevinster at hente ved en sådan samordning, ikke mindst i betragtning af at der kan komme en hård vinter.
The Europol Convention does not include the Court of Justice and the question is really who is to blame for this amateurism?
Kommissionen er parat til at påtage sig denne opgave.
The British Government, of course, let us be honest about it.
Jeg forbereder derfor et initiativ med henblik på at lade det, som der allerede er truffet afgørelse om, indgå i en samlet konvention.
That has to change. I would remind the Council and the policy-makers of the words of President Kennedy, who said:
Hensigten var at få et bedre billede af situationen i Europa og udarbejde retningslinjer for en konference i løbet af 1996.
I dream of things that might be, and ask why not!'
Jeg vil også gerne sige et par ord om vore internationale kontakter.
The Member States are basically acting within what is merely an international and intergovernmental framework, as, for example, in the case of the Schengen Agreement.
Også uden for Unionens grænser er der stigende interesse for de retlige og indre anliggender.
The central issue here is certainly not to be too opposed to Schengen; we can take it more or less for granted that the great majority in the House favour improving coordination of national policies.
Antallet af kontakter med andre landes regeringer er øget kraftigt i løbet det seneste år.
If citizens are soon to be able personally to feel the benefits of integration in the Union, they have at the same time to feel freer but also more secure.
Jeg tænker i den forbindelse ikke kun på kontakterne med vore transatlantiske venner i USA og Canada.
While that objective is clear to us, all of the rest continues to be a technical problem, albeit with what are certainly major political implications.
Især for Central- og Østeuropas vedkommende er sådanne kontakter blevet væsentlige.
It waited till the horses had bolted before shutting the stable door.
Et samarbejde om retlige og indre anliggender, der fungerer, er en nødvendighed for en fremtidig udvidelse af Unionen. Et veludviklet retssystem skaber de nødvendige forudsætninger for en fungerende økonomi og el demokratisk politisk system.
But we believe firmly in the values of democracy, freedom and law, and we want to be clear about one thing: we cannot continue legislating in a field which directly affects the fundamental rights of citizens and individuals using procedures that are outside real democratic control, and it is logical that democratic control should be achieved above all by according Parlia
Gradin man ikke kun her i Europa-Parlamentet, men også i medlems staterne.
Sierra González tence of excessive governmentalism traditionally devoted to the development of the 'third pillar'.
Men dermed være ikke sagt, at der ikke er nogen problemer — tværtimod.
To be more specific, refugees and asylum-seekers suffer most from this deficit.
Kommissionen har forud for den regeringskonference, som indledes næste år, nøje analyse ret de foreliggende problemstillinger. Vi har draget den konklusion, at der er behov for betydelige forandringer.
If progress is to be made in this area, it will certainly be through amending the paralysing unanimity mie, and one day we must force that through, but we must also take a broader and tougher position, and get down to drawing up and approving a great founding text for a European Union charter to inspire immigration and asylum policy in all our States.
Vi må have ambitioner om at skabe større effektivitet, bedre retssikkerhed og en højere grad af demokratisk kontrol.
In fact we must move forward on Article la of the Geneva Convention on the definition of a refugee.
For at opnå dette har Kommissionen bl.a. foreslået, at samtlige samarbejdsområder, undtagen det politimæssige og det strafferetlige, overføres til søjle 1.
These circumstances explain why the opinions of the European Parliament have not been duly taken into consideration, but the fact that this situation can be explained does not mean it is defensible.
Politi og strafferetsspørgsmål skal således som hovedregel forblive mellemstatslige anliggender.
It is difficult to defend the way in which Parliament has been bypassed in respect of justice and home affairs, on questions which affect individual freedoms.
I mod sætning til den nuværende situation bør Europa-Parlamentet imidlertid inddrages, og EU-Domstolen tildeles en rolle.
However, there has been no political will to overcome the limitations of intergovernmentalism.
Desuden bør Kommissionen have ret til at fremsætte forslag.
There has been a lack of willingness to use the means offered by Articles K.3 and K.4 of the Treaty on European Union.
Og nu. hr. formand, til en række mere principielle problemstillinger.
In fact, the most recent instruments approved as regards cooperation in justice and home affairs themselves mention this lack of willingness, both in the content of the texts and in the approval procedure.
Kommissionen påtager sig denne opgave.
Can we carry on along this path?
I den forrige rapport, der også blev udarbejdet på Kommissionens initiativ, konstaterede man. at det var for tidligt at rejse spørgsmålet.
Of course we can. but we would not be heading towards a Europe of rights and freedoms if we did.
Rådet var enigt heri og slog fast. at spørgsmålet kunne tages op igen inden udgangen af 1995. i det mindste for så vidt angår asylpolitikken. Efter at have analyseret henholdsvis fordele og ulemper i forbindelse med K.9. er Kommissionen nået frem til. at ulemperne vejer tungest.
I am very pleased with the assurances Mrs Fernández has given us, because today in various Union countries — including my own, France, to be honest — being threatened, attacked, or persecuted in one's own country does not lead to the right to claim refugee status unless this threat comes from the govern ment.
Det er der mange grunde til. De vigtigste er. al der i praksis ikke er nogen udsigt til. at det kan lade sig gøre at overføre spørgsmål fra søjle 3 til søjle I ved hjælp af artikel K.9.
That amounts to saying that Algerian citizens, journal ists, lawyers, intellectuals and more widely still, young rebel Algerian women, are refused this status in advance.
Hvis vi alligevel forsøgte, ville det enten resultere i en øjeblikkelig blokering i Rådet eller, i værste fald. en folkeafstemning i Danmark.
Approach ing these issues from the very narrow angle of police operations and repression is in practice an indignity.
Kommissionen har derfor draget den slutning, at det er mere meningsfuldt at handle inden for rammerne af regeringskonferencen i 1996.
A closer look at respect for individual and fundamental liberties would be both more effective and more honourable.
Vi har taget adskillige nye initiativer og lagt et stort arbejde i forberedelsen af dem. Nu kræver det politisk vilje af' alle, hvis Kommissionens visioner og højt satte forventninger skal indfris.
Berthu (EDN). — (FR) Madam President, according to the resolution adopted by the Committee on Civil Liberties, progress on cooperation in matters of policing and justice needs to come through systematic extension of Community powers and the power of the European Parliament, as if there were no possibility of democracy outside this hémicycle.
Et spørgsmål, som jeg i årets løb har lagt en hel del arbejde i. er forbedringer af arbejdsformerne inden for rammerne af K.4-Udvalgct. De flesle medlemsstater er enige om. at der er for mange beslutningsniveauer.
Lindholm (V). — (SV) Madam President, the Green Group in the European Parliament supports many points in the resolution of the Committee on Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs, for example a number of points criticizing the lack of information to and consultation with both the committee and Parliament, and the lack of openness and public information.
Desuden gør de mange arbejds grupper arbejdet fragmenteret og ineffektivt.
We note that this attitude is a clear violation of Article K.6 of the Treaty.
Jeg har desværre endnu ikke laet noget reaktion. Jeg vil derfor tage spørgsmålet op på ny. når jeg mødes med det italienske formandskab.
We also note that 'free movement of persons' in the Treaty is not the same as that in the Schengen Agreement, of which we in the Green Group are highly critical since, amongst other things, it opens up our borders to illegal trafficking of all kinds but raises high barriers to refugees.
Arbejdsformerne kan ændres betydeligt, uden al man ændrer traktaten.
As a member of the Swedish environmental movement in politics, I am extremely critical of Europol as an institution, a kind of European FBI. but also as an undesirable competitor to Interpol.
Det er nødvendigt at gøre noget omgående.
Also, some people seem to have blind faith in Europol's ability to solve all problems.
Wiebenga (ELDR). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg hørte for lidt siden den spanske statssekretær, rådsformandskabets repræsentant, sige, at hun vil forlade mødet om lidt og ikke mere kan være til stede under resten af forhandlingen. Det får mig til at sige, at det naturligvis ikke kan gå an.
To show you how remote certain Member States are from this opinion today, I shall restrict myself to reading you a few lines from the joint Franco-German letter of 8 December last, which sets the objective of guaranteeing freedom of movement through a common approach — I stress common — in particular in the area of asylum and immigration and by strengthened cooperation — I stress cooperation — making it possible to ensure the safety of citizens in a really effective way.
For det første skal det være en regeringsrepræsentants største pligt og højeste priori tet at forsvare politikken under en politisk forhandling i Parlamentet.
You will note two points: first, a common approach and not a Community one is involved, which means that the Franco-German letter stands back, not only from the European Parliament, but also from the report of the Westendorp working group.
Desuden er dette en forhandling på grundlag af Maastricht-Traktaten, én gang om året, og den bør rådsformandskabet overvære.
Secondly, it is a question of strengthened cooperation, thus an intergovernmental procedure.
Denne årlige forhandling finder sted i henhold til Maastrichttraktatens artikel K.6.
As a member of the Swedish environmental movement in politics.
Artiklen er uheldigt formuleret, da den giver mulighed for skønsmæssige fortolkninger.
I am convinced that the intergovernmental status of the third pillar should be strengthened — not weakened.
Jeg mener eksempelvis, at alle spørgsmål bør betragtes som vigtige, og at Parlamentet bør informeres eller høres.
Existing aims and decisions, which enjoy general and popular acceptance, require unanimity and retention of the right of veto.
Artiklens nuværende udformning skaber unødig friktion.
This undoubtedly leads to a certain inertia, but democracy is, and must be allowed to be, hard going.
Alle tvetydigheder af denne ari bør derfor ryddes af vejen på regeringskonferencen.
Surely democracy is worth the effort?
Vi har ikke fået noget svar vedrørende indholdet på dette punkt!
This approach is the exact opposite of the European Parliament's.
Hr. formand, forudsætningerne for at kunne gøre et godt stykke arbejde på søjle 1-området drejer sig naturligvis også om. hvor store ressourcer Kommissionen har.
In particular it means that national parliaments should have a preponderant role in monitoring the third pillar.
Det er nærmest et mirakel, at de kan klare den enorme arbejdsbyrde, der påhviler dem.
This role, which is currently too small, should be upgraded in the future to make up the democratic deficit.
Formanden. — De indholdsmæssige aspekter behandles senere. re.
Pradier (ARE). — (FR) Madam President, this debate relates to what is conventionally called the progress achieved in 1995 on cooperation in the area of justice and home affairs.
Hvad angår det foregående spørgsmål, forklarede Rådets formand i begyndelsen af sit indlæg, hvorfor hun ikke ville kunne deltage i den videre drøftelse, og jeg kan ikke ændre denne tingenes tilstand.
That is a euphemism because progress has been unimpressive to say the least despite the significant activity of the Spanish presidency, which should be applauded here and perhaps even deserves homage.
Jeg har besvaret de to første spørgsmål.
All right, let's talk about them.
Realiseringen af den frie bevægelighed i Europaeren sådan opgave.
Sadly in my country, in spite of a few brave judges, the scales of justice are rigged.
Lindeperg bliver svaret på de spørgsmål, som mine kolleger vil stille, såvel som på de spørgsmål, som jeg har rejst om Europa-Parlamentets rolle m.v.
Monod, President of Lyonnaise des Eaux, they have turned the tap on for every party except the Front National.
Oomen Ruijten (PPE). — (NL) Fru formand, jeg er glad for. at rådsformanden igen er her. men den måde. hvorpå hun har forsøg! at behandle Parlamentet, vidner om en sådan ringeagt for Europa-Parlamentet, at jeg synes, at der godt må gøres en bemærkning herom.
the three Monti initiatives, which are good initiatives in themselves and which we very much welcome, but which cannot be put into effect — as they really should — because the abovementioned three agreements have not yet been fully implemented.
Formanden. — Fru Oomen-Ruijten. jeg vil for nogle øjeblikke lægge min objektive rolle som formand på hylden for ganske enkelt at minde vor forsamling om, at punktet oprindeligt var anført til kl. 16.30. og at vi derfor bærer en del af ansvaret for denne forsinkelse.
In the case of the disgraceful desecration of Carpentras cemetery, wrongly ascribed to the Front National by a massive political and media campaign, a magistrate from a left-wing union peremptorily declared, and I quote: 'the innocence of the Front National has not been proved'.
D'Ancona (PSE). — (NL) Hr. formand, måden, hvorpå denne forhandling føres og om lidt risikerer at blive ført uden det spanske formandskabs tilstedeværelse, viser egentlig nøjagtigt det, som vi her fokuserer på, nemlig at når det drejer sig om den tredje søjle, har Parlamentet ikke noget at skulle have sagt, hverken sidste år eller i år.
This decision should be compared with the astounding decision of the Grenoble magistrates, Mr Delpeuch, Mr Chalvon-Demorçay and Mr Conte, who exonerated a person who desecrated a cemetery of any penalty on the sole grounds that they regarded his act as a political protest and only required him to carry out a ceremony of reparation in the cemetery in question.
Jeg har al respekt for de grunde, som det spanske formandskab kan have til ikke længere at kunne blive her, det forstår jeg, men så siger jeg. så har det heller ikke nogen mening at fortsætte denne forhandling, og så må vi fortsætte denne forhandling på et andet tidspunkt under formandskabets tilstedeværelse.
But everything is explained once we are aware that the Grenoble cemetery was Christian and the desecrator, Mr Mohammed Lallouache, was a master of the Algerian confer ence.
Brinkhorst (ELDR). — (EN) Hr. formand, kunne De måske spørge den spanske minister, om hun vil være rede til at blive — i modsat fald vil jeg påberåbe mig Europa-Parlamentets forretningsordens artikel 132 og bede om en afbrydelse af forhandlingerne til næste mødeperiode?
Last March, during the presidential campaign in Auch, a peaceful procession of young members of the Front National was caught in an ambush.
Lindeperg (PSE). — (FR) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne fremhæve det punkt, som De lige har rejst, og som jeg rejste for lidt siden.
I would like to remind you of a second aspect in connection with today's debate, namely that the Maastricht Treaty sets freedom of movement of individuals as an objective of Community legislation yet lays down that the Schengen agreement must continue to be a question of purely inter governmental cooperation.
Rent faktisk forstår jeg ikke. at man begyndte debatten kl. 18.30. dvs. to timer senere end planlagt, når mødet var sat til at skulle slutte kl. 19.00.
In the end that will mean that we organize the free movement of persons at this level and thus, although complying with a requirement of the Maastricht Treaty, do so outside the framework of the Treaty.
Jeg mener, at der rent faktisk er el medansvar i debattens tilrettelæggelse.
That creates a major deficit, namely a democratic deficit.
Den kritik, der er rejst over for formanden for Rådet, er således i det store og hele delt hvad angår vort medansvar som Parlament.
If the free movement of persons is achieved at intergovernmental cooperation level, then in the end the national parliaments will not be able to control the organizational, technical and administrative framework at national state level, but nor will this come under the control of the European Parliament.
Den bemærkning, som jeg ønskede at tilføje, slutter sig således til Deres.
But a component of the Maastricht Treaty that affects the citizens' basic freedoms in the way the free movement of persons does must come under democratic control.
Oomen-Ruijten (PPE). — (FR) Fru formand, forhandlingen var fastsat til at skulle finde sted kl. 18.30.
Commissioner, I would ask you to take this into account too in your initiatives, which we greatly welcome.
Jeg er nok den. der er mest ked af at have måttet meddele Dem. at jeg ikke kunne deltage i den videre drøftelse.
An octogenarian sympathiser was knocked down by a car.
Jeg troede, at debatten begyndte kl. 16.30 og sluttede kl. 19.00.
Our steward availed himself of his legitimate right of self-defence.
Mine damer og herrer, kl. er nu 19.40.
What do you think happened?
Jeg vil forsøge at blive endnu et stykke tid. men det er meget kompliceret.
It complains that criticism of its decision is an outrage.
Disse indlæg har forsinket os voldsomt. En gruppe har endog overskredet sin taletid med to minutter.
This scandalous bias is found at other levels.
Hr. rådsrepræsentant. tillad mig helt ærligt og venligt at sige til Dem. at Rådet begynder al behandle Parlamentet på en så overlegen måde, at det vil ende med en revolution!
In view of that circumstance I want to begin by pointing out that the agreement to cooperate in important areas of home affairs — from asylum and immigration via combating drugs to the creation of a European police force — has represented a major step forward In European policy-making.
Ford (PSE). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne give udtryk for en vis sympati med det spanske formandskab.
Political bias is in bed with the thought police.
Jeg var til stede tidligere og spurgte, hvornår det var sandsynligt, det ville være min tur til at tale.
The communist Marchais-Gayssot law sets restrictions on free speech and decrees what people are allowed to say.
Jeg fik den besked, at det ville blive omkring kl. 17.00.
It is forbidden to question the official, but constantly changing, history of the last world war.
Forhandlingerne er jo så helt klart blevet kraftigt forsinkede.
No-one can make a comment about a foreigner unless it is favourable.
D'Ancona (PSE). — (NL) Fru formand, inden De tror. al jeg bruger for megen taletid, vil jeg sige. at jeg også har faet to minutter af' hr. Schulz.
This should be seen alongside the acquittal of Mr Sine, who expressed his scorn and hatred for a people abusively on television.
Caccavale (UPE). — (IT) Hr. formand, hr. Brinkhorst har fremsat en klar anmodning om udsættelse af forhandlingen.
It is because of the mechanism assigned to the third pillar, namely intergovernmental cooperation.
De har ikke svaret herpå.
Obviously, no more could be achieved in Maastricht.
Lad os derfor stemme om udsættelsen af denne forhandling, som i øvrigt ikke har været nogen forhandling, men en monolog, hr. formand. Ikke et forslag vedrørende dagsorden!
But it is clear that it has not so far proved possible to achieve the necessary harmonization in the case, for instance, of asylum policy, by means of intergovernmental cooperation.
De får lejlighed til at fremsætte denne anmodning, når mødet genoptages kl. 21.00.
Yet it is becoming increasing ly necessary to cooperate in the field of the third pillar.
Jeg har brug for omkring en sjettedel af den tid, som del spanske formandskab havde brug for til at sige. at med al respekt for alle disse aktioner og alle disse aktiviteter er der alligevel tale om en fornemmelse af, at vi lever i lo forskellige verdener.
The fewer internal borders there are and the greater freedom of movement we achieve, the more urgent the need for uniform decisions on who can apply for and be granted asylum here and under what conditions.
(Mødet udsat kl. 19.40 og genoptaget kl. 21.00)
Schulz (PSE). — (DE) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, I think it is a difficult job to be an interpreter in this House, but at times it must certainly also be an amusing one.
At det spanske formandskabs redegørelse gav os indtryk af, at der foregik vældig meget, en overvældende mængde af aktiviteter, som vi i Parlamentei, men også Kommissionen, egentlig ikke er involveret i.
The agreement on the external borders, the Dublin agreement on asylum and the agreement on the European information system are three points I would like to discuss briefly.
Del er nu egentlig netop det afgørende punkt i denne iredje søjle.
They are making very slow progress and have not yet been implemented technically.
Og al det er så meget desto alvorligere, fordi Europas borgere nu forventer
But in this situation we were also presented with
Formanden. — Jeg erklærer mødet for genoptaget.
Interestingly enough, we have Article K.9 in Title VI of the Treaty.
Der var en let slingren ved slutningen af mødet her til eftermiddag.
It provides a bridge towards communitization.
Vi er glade for at se Rådet repræsenteret.
But this bridge has not been crossed because the Council has to decide unanimously.
Jeg vil allerførst give fru Oomen-Ruijten ordet til forretningsordenen.
It cannot do so, not least because even a unanimous decision would have to be ratified, with the consequence that at least one country would have to hold a referendum whose outcome would be quite uncertain.
D'Ancona ratificere Europol-konventionen, for at nævne et par af Rådets fiaskoer.
So what is to be done? At this moment there is no point in suggesting Article K.9 initiatives.
De spørgsmål, der er omhandlet i afsnit VI, er tæt på borgerne.
At this moment we are looking to the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference.
Kan Europa ikke indfri løfterne på dette område, får borgerne ikke den frie bevæge lighed, som er et af det europæiske projekts væsentligste aspekter.
Not all of them, for that would be unrealistic, but at least some of them, where this is particularly urgent, must be communitized and, Commissioner, Parliament is emphatically in favour of that and supports you in this!