natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det er en stor skam, for vi har fået forlagt et budget, der i første omgang som tillægs­ og ændringsbudget globalt reducerer de ikke­obligatoriske udgifter med hensyn til forpligtelses­ og beta­lingsbevillinger, som vi vedtog i dc:ember.
This is a great pity because we have before us a budget which in the first instance as a supplemen­tary and amending budget globally reduces the non­compulso­ry expenditure in respect of the commitment and payment appropriations that we voted in December.
Det er et budget, som vi har forsøgt at få frem til et punkt, hvor der kunne opnås enighed mellem budgetmyndighedens to parter.
It is a budget that we have been trying to get to a position of agreement between the two arms of the budgetary authority.
Desværre har vi ikke opnået dette, men vi troede i vor ærlige bestræbelse, at vi kunne få denne enighed.
Unfortunately, we have failed to achieve that but we thought in our honest endeavours that we could get that agreement.
Det er et budget, der ikke bør have nogen indflydelse på den sag, som Rådet har anlagt mod Parlamentet. Derfor håbede vi, at tingene ville gå glat.
It is a budget which should not interfere with the court case brought by the Council against Parliament.
FORSÆDE: Sir Jack STEWART­CLARK Næstformand
Finally, tomorrow we will vote through this supplementary and amending budget 1/95.
Howitt (PSE). — (EN) Hr. formand, i aftes var jeg ude at stemme dørklokker som en del af den lokale valgkampagne i Essex og hørte, hvordan rygter om, at bosniske flygtninge tog hjælp fra de hjemløse, bredte sig i de lokale områder med socialt boligbyggeri.
It is urgently needed because of enlargement and I would hope that there will be no moves to prevent President Hänsch signing this very important supple­mentary and amending budget.
I sidste weekend valgte også hver tredje af Frankrigs arbejd­sløse at stemme på det åbenlyst racistiske Front National, hvis præk bringer skam selv over denne sal.
If Parliament does not agree this budget tomorrow, it will have serious implica­tions for all our institutions and one would hope that after tomorrow we can get on making our presentations to the Council and to the Commission to make sure that the spirit of cooperation between the three institutions continues through this year so that we can get a good budget for next year in 1996.
Alligevel har Rådet ved andenbehandling uden at give nogen særlig grand afvist flere ændringsforslag, der blev stillet af Parlamentet ved førstebehandling.
Yet the Council, at its second reading, rejected without giving any specific reasons several amendments which had been tabled by Parliament at our first reading.
Dette har vakt nogen forandring, for under trilogen i Strasbourg spurgte jeg Rådets repræsentanter helt præcis, om der var nogen problemer med andre udgiftsområder end udgiftsområde 1.
This caused some surprise because at the trialogue meeting in Strasbourg I asked the Council representative quite specifically whether there were any problems with the other categories besides category 1.
Vi vidste, at der var problemer med udgiftsområde 1, men jeg fik det indtryk, at der ikke var nogen problemer i de andre udgiftsområder.
We knew there were problems with category 1 but I was given the impression that there were no problems in the other categories.
Nu opdager vi så, at Rådet har afvist vore ændringsforslag til handlingsprogram under udgiftsområde 2; med hensyn til udgiftsområde 4, har det afvist mindst ni af vore ændringsfor­slag og i udgiftsområde 3 har det afvist ændringsforslag om informationspolitik, møder i arbejdstagerorganisationer, den europæiske arbejdsanvisning, HELIOS, overvågningscentre for narkotika, energi­ og forskning, miljø og det indre marked, en masse konti, som vi anser for ganske væsentlige.
We now find that Council has rejected our amend­ments on Community initiatives in category 2; on category 4 it has rejected at least nine of our amendments and in category 3 it has rejected amendments on information policy, meetings of workers' organizations, European employment services, Helios, monitoring centre for drugs, energy and research, environment and internal market, a lot of lines which we consider to be quite important.
Det franske formandskab bør forsøge at overbevise Europas regeringer om, at der er behov for en revision af traktaten, og at styrke Europas evne til at modstå racismen.
In addition to the annual technical adjustment under paragraph 9, paragraph 10 provides for the adjustment of the financial perspective to take account of the conditions of implementation.
Og når hr. Flynn lover flere antiracistiske kampagner, så må han, hvor velkomne de end er, ikke forveksle det at tale med det at gøre noget ved racismen. Der er behov for et direktiv.
This means that adjustments concern the transfer to subsequent years of allocations for the structural funds and the cohesion funds not used in the previous year.
I tilgift har Kommissionen i sit foreløbige forslag til budget ikke sat spørgsmålstegn ved vor holdning med hensyn til klassifikationen af udgifter.
In this light we have two proposals from the Commission.
Vi bør erindre, at det argument, vi har prøvet at fremføre over for Rådet, er, at vi er overbevist om, at det, vi gør, og den måde, vi stemmer på, er rigtig.
The first relates to the non­utilization of ECU 1,73 billion in 1994, the Commission proposing that the ceilings for category 2 of the financial perspective should be revised and able to be distributed, 75% in 1996 and 25% in 1997.
For vort vedkommende efterlevede Parlamentet bestemmelserne i traktaten ved førstebehandling; vi efterlevede bestemmelserne i finansforordningen og bestemmelserne i de finansielle over­slag.
Initially we in the Committee on Budgets felt that this should be spread not over two years but over three years so that we should have proper management of the funds.
Det blev gjort i en samarbejdets ånd, som det kræves af budgetmyndighedens to grene.
However, in the light of dialogue with the Council in the trialogue on 4 April, we reached agreement that we should have a spread of distribution for commitment appropriations of 50% in 1996 and 50% in 1997.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er forhandling under ét om følgende betænkninger:
We should remember that the argument that we have been trying to put to the Council is that we are convinced that what we are doing and the way we vote will be right.
— A4­0086/95 af Wynn og Dankert for Budgetudvalget om Rådets modifikation af Parlamentets ændringer af forslag til tillægs­ og ændringsbudget nr. 1 for regnskabsåret 1995 — sektion III — Kommissionen;
As far as we are concerned, at the first reading Parliament complied with the provisions of the Treaty; we complied with the provisions of the financial regulation and we complied with the provisions of the financial perspective.
Vi har også sikret, at der er en margin i alle udgiftsområder bortset fra udgiftsområde 2, i overensstemmelse med paragraf 19 i den interinstitutionelle aftale.
We have also ensured that there is a margin in all the categories except category 2 in accordance with paragraph 19 of the interinstitutional agreement.
Igen må jeg beklage, at Rådet i undersektion Bl i udgiftsområde 1 ikke har fulgt Kommissionens forslag som formuleret i det foreløbige forslag til budget.
Once again, I regret that in subsection Β1 in category 1, the Council has departed from the Commission proposals set out in the PDB.
Hvad der er værre, de har nægtet at indlede ad hoc­proceduren, da vi anmodede om det.
Worse, it has refused to open the ad­hoc procedure when we requested it.
Det anser vi for at være en overtrædelse af den interinstitutionelle aftale.
That we consider to be a breach of the interinstitutional
Når alt dette er sagt, kan jeg anbefale Parlamentet, at vi under disse omstændigheder opretholder ændringsforslagene, der genindsætter det foreløbige forslag til budget og af Rådet bliver betragtet som modifikationer. Med hensyn til de andre overskrifter i undersektion Β1, bør vi vedtage Kommissionens overslag.
Secondly, with regard to the second proposal on payment appropriations, in addition to an increase on the ceiling on payment appropriations to cover the commitments for appro­priation already covered, i.e. 1,738 billion, it was also agreed at the trialogue to increase the payment appropriations' ceiling by ECU 500 million.
Wynn (PSE), ordfører. - (EN) Hr. formand, for det første vil jeg geme på vegne af min kollega, Piet Dankert, undskylde, at han desværre ikke kan være til stede i dag.
All these figures are set out in my report and the motion for a resolution was adopted unanimously by the
Men det skete ikke, og for skallede 3 mio ECU må vi så igennem hele dette cirkus med andenbehandling af tillægsbudgettet, selv om vi kunne have vedtaget det ved førstebehandling.
The first reason is this: the preceding presidency of the Council stated, in reply to a question by the President of the European Parliament follow ing the vote at the second reading of the 1995 budget in December 1994, that it did indeed take the view that the ceiling rate, as defined in Article 203 of the Treaty, would be adhered to and that the European Parliament's decisions were in no way unjustified.
Det er rimeligt at sige, at det er den eneste ændring, vi har foretaget i forhold til førstebehandling.
I should like to support those comments which our rapporteur for the 1995 budget has made.
Hvad angår udgiftsområde 5, glæder vi os over, at Rådet har vedtaget alle ændringsforslagene.
It is obviously not very satisfactory to have rather a messy procedure on this supplementary budget and certainly the second reading of the Council did not reflect the positions taken by the Council in the trialogue where it gave us to understand that all the categories from 2 to 5 would be accepted and that a great effort would be made to make sure that the Council would adopt the Commission's proposals.
Og her benytter jeg så hr. Dankerts taletid og siger, at også han glæder sig over, at Rådet har vedtaget alle ændringsforslagene til udgiftsområde 5. Det var slut på hr. Dankerts taletid.
As it happened, it did not and for a mere ECU 3 million we have to go through this whole charade of having a second reading of the supplementary budget when we could have agreed it on the first reading.
Efter vor opfattelse bør vi især se på tre punkter.
We should look at three specific points from our point of view.
For det første er der med hensyn til landbrugsudgifterne reel uenighed om klassifikationen, en uenighed der måske ikke kan bilægges, selv når Domstolen afsiger sin kendelse.
First, on agriculture expenditure, there is a real disagreement on classification which will perhaps not be resolved even when the Court comes up with its judgment.
Men vi håber, at Domstolen snart vil dømme til vor fordel snarere end til Rådets.
But we hope that the Court will shortly adjudicate on our side rather than for the Council.
Men vi vil afvente denne dom.
But we will wait for that judgment to be made.
Vi er enige i ordførerens vurdering, at andenbehandling af tillægsbudgettet ikke påvirker den retssag, som Rådet i øjeblikket har indledt, og vi kan bestemt ikke se, at det er nødvendigt at få endnu en sag forelagt for Domstolen på grund af denne behandling her i Parlamentet.
We agree with the rapporteur's assessment that this second reading of the supplementary does not infringe on the court case which is currently being undertaken by the Council and we certainly do not see that it is necessary to have a second case brought by the Council to the Court because of this particular reading by Parliament.
Der er påtrængende behov for det på grund af udvidelsen, og jeg håber, at der ikke vil blive taget nogen initiativer til at forhindre hr. Hänsch i at underskrive dette meget vigtige tillægs- og ændringsbudget.
Secondly, I interpret the letter that Mr Juppé sent off at some time or other to mean that the reservation set out in it relates solely to the three budget lines affected by the classification.
Jeg hører alle mulige rygter, og jeg håber, at de er ubegrundede. Hvis Parlamentet ikke vedtager dette budget i morgen, vil det få alvorlige konsekvenser for alle vore institutioner, og man må håbe, at vi efter i morgen kan gå videre og forelægge vore synspunkter for Rådet og Kommissionen for at sikre, at samarbejdets ånd i forholdet mellem de tre institutioner kan fortsætte gennem dette år, så vi kan få et godt budget til næste år, i 1996.
That establishes the position we had during the trialogue — perhaps we should make the trialogue public off and on so that no-one can depart from the statements and agreements they made in it — and means that the supplementary and amending budget deliberations in no way affect either the position of Parliament or the position of the Council in relation to the discussions on the question of classification, on which we are instituting proceedings before the European Court of Justice.
For det andet var vi naturligvis under hele denne ændringsprocedure bekymrede over, at vi ved at vedtage tillægsbudgettet ville få over 1000 medarbejdere mere til oversættelse og tolkning, og vi foreslog, at noget af oversættelsen måske kunne ske ved, at man opfordrede oversætterne til at blive i deres eget land.
Secondly, when we were going through this whole supplementary procedure, we were of course concerned by the fact that by adopting this supplementary budget, we would be having over a thousand new personnel for translation and interpretation and we urged that perhaps some of this management of translation could be done by encouraging the translators to remain in their own country.
Vi forstår, at vi i Kommissionen vil se på disse forslag om en realistisk forvaltning af oversættelsen.
We understand the Commission will be looking at this kind of suggestion for realistic management of translation.
Der findes nu fax.
Fax now exists.
Det kan vi bruge frem for at få oversættere og tolke med familie til at arbejde på centrale steder.
We can use that rather than bringing the translators, interpreters and their families to work in a central location.
Det betyder, at justeringer ne drejer sig om overførsel til følgende år af bevillinger fra strukturfondene og samhørighedsfondene, der ikke er benyttet i det foregående år. For det andel de samlede bevillinger til betalinger for at sikre, at der i lyset af det, der er nødvendigt, kan ske en ordnet udvikling i forhold til forpligtelsesbevillingerne. gerne.
The Council alone would be responsible if the new Member States were further prevented from appointing their staff and ensuring full integration in the programmes and if the appropriate Community resources were not made available.
Endelig, og dette har at gøre med det interinstitutionelle samarbejde.
Lastly, this infringes on interinstitutional cooperation.
Jeg vil henlede alles opmærksomhed på det, der kom fra Rådet som resultat af 10. april, og hvori det hedder, at man som Parlamentet henviser til det nødvendige interinstitutionelle samarbejde, der tillader en rationalisering af de administrative udgifter. Jeg vil geme understrege, at vi er enige med Rådet, det vil sige den politiske repræsentant i Rådet, om, at vi ønsker en ordentlig dialog på interinstitutionelt plan.
I would draw to everyone's attention what came from the Council as a result of 10 April. I only have it in French: Par ailleurs il en appelle, comme le Parlement, à la nécessaire coopération interinstitutionelle permettant une rationalisation de dépenses administratives.
Jeg ønsker ikke at se dette camoufleret eller saboteret af embedsmænd, der arbejder i Rådet eller for den sags skyld i Kommissionen eller Parlamentet.
I would not wish to see this camouflaged or sabotaged by the civil servants working in the Council or for that matter in the Commission or Parliament.
Vi vil sikre, at dette samarbejde kommer til at virke.
We want to make sure that the cooperation really works.
Hvad er det centrale punkt?
What is its function?
Det centrale er ikke nogen ny politik, det centrale i tillægs- og ændringsbudget nr. 1 for regnskabsåret 1995 er integrationen af de tre nye medlemslande. de.
The objective is to reach agreements at political level.
For det andet vedtog man, med hensyn til det andet forslag om betalingsbevillinger, ud over en forøgelse af loftet for betalingsbevillinger, der skulle dække forpligtelser for allerede dækkede bevillinger, det vil sige 1,738 mia, i trilogen også at forøge loftet over betalingsbevillingerne med 500 mio ECU.
Samland (PSE), chairman of the Committee on Budgets. — (DE) Mr President, sometimes one has a lot of time when one does not need it and sometimes one has little time when one does need it.
Alle disse tal står i min betænkning, og beslutningsforslaget blev enstemmigt vedtaget af Budgetudvalget.
I would have liked to have spoken a little longer on the discharge, today I shall be a little more brief.
Jeg opfordrer Parlamentet til at vedtage denne betænkning.
What is the central issue?
Vi tog ved at omsætte beslutningen allerede de indledende skridt til at integrere de tre medlemslande, nemlig i kraft af vor beslutning under andenbehandlingen af budgettet for 1995.
When implementing this decision we already anticipated the integration of the three Member States, which we did in our decision at the second reading of the 1995 budget.
På vegne af Det Europæiske Folkepartis Gruppe vil jeg geme støtte de kommentarer, som vor ordfører for 1995-budgettet har fremsat.
The first event was that the budget was not adopted in one reading.
Det er naturligvis ikke særlig tilfredsstillende at have en så rodet procedure i dette tillægsbudget, og Rådets andenbehandling afspejlede ikke den holdning, som Rådet havde indtaget under trilogen, hvor det
Although the finance minister responsible at the time found very strong and good words that persuaded us to withdraw some amendments and formulate a compromise, this finance minister's colleagues were not able, at administrative level, to establish majorities in the Council.
Han kunne ellers have bragt klarhed i
We have agreed that we will now embark on interinstitutional cooperation and as you have heard the first
Samland de rygter, der verserer om et brev, som den franske udenrigsminister sendte til formanden for Europa-Parlamentet, og som først ikke var dateret og senere blev tilbagedateret.
Samland preparatory meetings on it are taking place. There again I now hear that the Council officials are already scared stiff in case the objectives set there at political level will actually be transposed into practical policy!
Jeg siger det endnu en gang højt og tydeligt, så det umuligt kan misforstås: For det første ønsker Parlamentet, at der i morgen foretages afstemning, og at formanden for Parlamentet derefter kan underskrive budgettet, således at midlerne til integrationen af de tre nye medlemslande bliver frigivet.
because it is now a question of posts provided for the integration of the three new Member States and it would be extremely embarrassing if we had to penalize them for the exchange rate shifts between the ecu and the Belgian franc in order to make up for the difficulties we are having in category 5; so that is what I have to say on the adjustment of the 1996 financial perspective in relation to the administrative expenditure in category 5.
må det være i Kommissionens, Rådets og Parlamentets interesse, at denne administration håndteres professionelt!
For if the European Union more than triples the area of the buildings it has to manage here in Brussels alone, then it must be in the interest of the Commission, the Council and Parliament for the management of those buildings to be organized professionally!
Det er da frygtelig dumt, at Kommissionen, Rådet og Parlamentet med hver sin udlicitering af alt fra rengøring til sikkerhedstjeneste hver for sig henvender sig til monopolforetagenderne her i Bruxelles og så opnår ufordelagtige priser.
It is total nonsense for the Commission, the Council and Parliament to have to make separate approaches to the monopolists sitting here in Brussels with separate invitations to tender from the cleaning service to the security service and then conclude contracts at bad prices!
Det er dumt, og det må høre op!
That is a nonsense and it must be put to an end!
Derfor er det fornuftigt med dette interinstitutionelle samarbejde.
That is why this interinstitutional cooperation makes sense.
Jeg ønsker, at det skal fungere, og Parlamentet ønsker det, men hvis De ikke gør Deres for at få samarbejdet til at fungere, fordi De på administrativt plan og der, hvor det gør ondt, modarbejder det, så vil vi offentliggøre det, og så vil vi konfrontere vedkommende med, at han derhjemme ellers altid påstår, at han er den sparsommeligste af alle sparsommelige, men når det bliver alvor, så smækker døren i, fordi det kunne komme til at gå ud over ham selv.
I want it. and Parliament wants it, and if you do not adhere to it because you undermine it at administrative level and even in areas where it actually hurts you too, then we will make that public and then we will confront those who undermine it with the fact that at home they always say they are so very thrifty, but when it is a question of what they have saved, they close the door in case they are affected.
Dette gælder også medarbejderne i Den Europæiske Union, mine kære parlamentsmedlemmer og mine damer og herrer på både den ene og den anden side derhenne foran!
I am also referring to the approach of colleagues in the European Union, ladies and gentlemen seated on both sides in front of me!
Altså, lad os håbe, at dette tilsagn om triloger i det mindste stadig har politisk indhold og ikke bryder sammen på samme måde som aftalen om at nøjes med en førstebehandling.
So let us hope that this assent to the trialogue will at least still have political substance and not collapse like the agreement just to have one reading.
For det andet fortolker jeg det brev, som hr. Juppé på et eller andet tidspunkt har afsendt, således, at det her formulerede forbehold alene går på de tre budgetposter, der er berørt af klassifikationsspørgsmålet.
We deliberately refrained from proposing any radical amendments, yet almost all of them, particularly those in the social field, have been rejected by the Council. It has nothing to do with the figures or the fact that we cannot get them any lower.
Det er alene op til Rådet, om de nye medlemslande fortsat skal hindres i at ansætte deres personale, at sørge for en fuldstændig integration i programmerne og at stille de tilsvarende midler til rådighed for Fællesskabet.
I had hoped that we would not have to play such a prominent part in this supplementary budget, but I regret to say that the Council has done its best to make everything as difficult as possible.
Rådet konfronterede os jo under andenbehandlingen med overordentlig overraskende resultater.
At the second reading the Council confronted us with extreme ly surprising statements.
Med hensyn til kategori I vil Rådet ikke acceptere klassifikationen af det foreløbige forslag.
On category 1 the Council refuses to accept the position of the preliminary draft.
Med hensyn til kategori II afviser det alle Parlamentets ændringsforslag om at udnytte fællesskabsinitiativerne til fordel for de nye medlemsstater.
On category 2 it rejects all Parliament's amendments on the use of Community initiatives in the interest of the new Member States.
Det handlede jo især om at udvide de fællesskabsinitiativer, hvor der er afsat særlige midler til de nye medlemslande.
Here it was specifically a question of building up the Community initiatives in which special resources are provided for the new Member States.
Kategori III: Rådet accepterer kun, at der opføres en ny post til at dække udgifterne til flytningen af CEDEFOP fra Berlin til Thessaloniki. Det skulle så sandelig også bare mangle, at denne post accepteres! I 1992 blev det besluttet, at CEDEFOP skulle flytte til Thessaloniki, men egentlig var det meningen, at et helt andet agentur skulle dertil.
Category 3: the Council only accepted the creation of new posts to cover expenditure for Cedefop's move from Berlin to Thessaloniki.
Men det havde allerede fået sæde i Italien, der var tilfældigvis så at sige allerede udsolgt.
However, that agency already had its seat in Italy, so in a sense it happened to be unavailable.