natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hr. formand, afslutningsvis vil jeg geme gentage det, jeg sagde i starten: Vi skal ikke udtænke aktioner, der kun vedrører et enkelt af systemets aspekter, f.eks. ved simpelthen at udvide det begreb, der hedder importørernes gode tro.
In conclusion, Mr President, I would reiterate what I said at the outset: we cannot envisage measures relating to just one element of the system, for example merely extending the notion of good faith on the part of importers.
I den forbindelse kan jeg med tilfredshed konstatere, at betænkningen af hr. Nordmann giver en beslutsom politisk støtte til de initiativer, som Kommissionen har taget til at forny administrationen af præferenceordningerne.
Here I am pleased to note that Mr Nordmann's report gives strong political backing to the Commission's initiative to update the management of preferential tariff arrangements.
Fremtidens udfordring er, at vi skal bekæmpe svindelen mere effektivt og samtidig påtage os vores an svar over for tredjelandene og de økonomiske aktører. Jeg
The challenge for the future is the need to combat fraud effectively, whilst at the same time shouldering our responsibilities to third countries and to economic opera tors, lam gratified to note that the Committee on Devel opment and Cooperation broadly shares the Commisr
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
') Agenda for next sitting: see Minutes.
MØDET TORSDAG DEN 22. OKTOBER 1998
SITTING OF THURSDAY, 22 OCTOBER 1998
Godkendelse af protokollen Rübig, Falconer, Rack, Kreissl­Dörfler, f
Approval of the Minutes Rübig, Falconer, Rack, Kreissl-Dörfler, Wijsenbeek
Aktuelle og uopsættelige spørgsmål af væsentlig betydning ­ Arrestation af general Pinochet
Topical and urgent subjects of major importance: Arrest of General Pinochet
Miljøvenlige produktionsmetoder landbruget ­ Bjergområder
Agricultural production and the environment - Forestry measures - Mountain areas
Miljøvenlige produktionsmetoder i landbruget ­ Støtte til skovbrugsforanstaltninger landbruget ­ Bjergområder (fortsættelse)
Agricultural production and the environment - Forestry measures - Mountain areas (continued)
FORSÆDE: Nicole FONTAINE Næstformand mere.
IN THE CHAIR: MRS FONTAINE its present form.
Den bidrager heller ikke til at bringe parlaments­medlemmernes mening ud til offentligheden.
For one thing, it does not communicate Members' views to the public as I would expect it to do.
(Bifald)
(The sitting was opened at 10 a.m.)
Formanden. ­ Tak for Deres indlæg.
President. - The Minutes of yesterday's sitting have been distributed.
Vi skal undersøge også denne sag.
Are there any comments?
Formanden. ­ Protokollen fra mødet i går er omdelt.
This saves money on the administration side.
Rübig (PPE). ­ (DE) Fru formand, jeg ville meddele, at der er forsvundet FRF 100 fra min postkasse.
Rübig (PPE). - (DE) Madam President, I wanted to in form you that 100 francs have disappeared from my petty cash.
Det er nu anden gang. Jeg vil geme bede Dem om at rette henven­delse til sikkerhedstjenesten for at få standset disse tyve­rier, som vi i gennemsnit har 10­15 af om måneden i Par­lamentet.
That is the second time this has happened.
Tak, fra formand!
Thank you, Madam President.
Formanden. ­ Som De ved, hr. Rübig, bestræber vi os for at gøre sikkerhedsforanstaltningerne i Parlamentets loka­ler så effektive som overhovedet mulig.
President - As you know, Mr Rübig, we try to provide the best possible security in all our places of work.
Tak for de oplys­ninger, De her har givet.
Thank you for this piece ofinformation.
Vi skal skærpe foranstaltnin­gerne yderligere.
I can assure you that we shall step up our efforts further still.
Falconer (PSE). ­ (EN) Fru formand, i går fremsatte jeg et indlæg her i Parlamentet, som blev referereret i regn­bueudgaven, men ikke nævnt i protokollen.
Falconer (PSE). - Madam President, yesterday I made a statement to the House which was recorded in the Rain bow.
Det eneste, der stod i protokollen, var, at jeg var til stede, og at jeg af­holdt mig fra at stemme.
However, it was not mentioned in the Minutes, apart from the comment that I was in the Chamber and was not voting.
Jeg deltog i alle afstemninger i går. Derfor vil jeg geme have protokollen ændret til at vise dette.
I took part in all the votes yesterday.
Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regn­skabsåret 1999. Ændringsforslag og forslag til æn­dring af bevillingerne i forslag til Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 1999: Sektion III ­ Kommissionen og ændringsforslagene til Sektion I, H, IV og VI i forslag til Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 1999 for Europa­Parlamentet, Rådet, Domstolen, Revisions­retten, Det Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg og Regions­udvalget
Draft amendments and proposed modifications concern ing the appropriations of Section III· of the draft general budget for 1999 concerning the Commission and draft amendments to Sections I, II, IV, V and VI of the draft general budget for 1999 concerning the European Parliament, Council, Court of Justice, Court of Auditors, Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Re gions
Vi skal rette de to fejl, De her påpeger.
That twofold mistake will be corrected.
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), ordfører. ­ (ES) Fru formand, før vi påbegynder denne vigtige afstemning, vil jeg geme fremføre tre bemærkninger.
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), rapporteur. - (ES) Madam President, before beginning this important vote, I would like to make three remarks.
For det første stemmer Parla­mentet først om ændringsforslag 888 om den strategiske reserve, hvis bevillinger eventuelt skal justeres til sidst i afstemningen.
First, Parliament is voting in itially on Amendment No 888, on the strategic reserve, the appropriations for which will need to be adjusted at the end of the vote.
For det andet bør der i fire budgetposter ­B2­517, B3^1003, B7­6201 og Β7­62Π ­ foretages nogle småjusteringer af beløbene, og jeg vil oplyse detal­jerne, når vi når frem til afstemningen om disse poster.
Second, small adjustments need to be made to the amounts relating to budget lines B2-517, B34003, B7-6201 and B7-6211, and I will give you the de tails when we reach the vote on those lines.
For det tredje er der to poster, nemlig B3­301 og B3­309, hvor bemærkningerne skal være mere præcise.
Third, more specific remarks need to be made regarding lines B3-301 and B3-309.
Og ende­lig bør der foretages nogle tekniske justeringer i anmærk­ningerne til ændringsforslagene til B3­4304, B7­500, B7­6602.
Lastly, certain technical adjustments need to be made in the remarks on the amendments to lines B34304, B7-500 and B7-6602.
Formanden. ­ Jeg kan ikke forestille mig, at der er tale om besparelsesforanstaltninger, hr. Rack.
Rack (PPE). - (DE) Madam President, I have a question which we should like the Bureau to answer as soon as possible.
Vi vil under alle omstændigheder undersøge sagen.
In the item on the Spaak report, for example, apart from the Commissioner and the rapporteur, nobody else is mentioned at all.
Jeg finder det sær­deles vigtigt, at referaterne er så nøjagtige som overhove­det muligt.
I should like an explanation for this. Is it only the German version which is affected, or is this part of a general savings drive?
Jeg finder det hensigtsmæssigt, at De i forbindelse med afstemningen fremkommer med de fornødne nærmere oplysninger, så­ledes at Parlamentets medlemmer ved, hvad de stemmer om.
I think it would in fact be preferable if you gave us the necessary details when the time comes, so that Members know exactly what they are voting on.
Kreissl­Dörfler (V). ­ (DE) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne tilslutte mig den forrige talers indlæg om dette pressere­ferat i Plenum aktuell i går.
President. -1 cannot imagine that these are measures to achieve savings, Mr Rack.
Hvis det bliver alminde­lig praksis i fremtiden, kan vi lige så godt holde op med at udgive denne avis, for på den måde har det ingen mening
I think it is very important that the reports should be as accurate as possible.
Samland (PSE), formand for Budgetudvalget. ­ (DE) Fru formand, for at det ikke senere ved afstemningen skal drukne i den almindelige uro, vil jeg udnytte tiden, mens man tager plads, til at takke Parlamentets tjenestegrene for det forbilledlige samarbejde, de har ydet, så forslag og dokumenter kunne lægges frem til os i rette tid på alle sprog.
Samland (PSE), chairman of the Committee on Budgets. - (DE) Madam President, since this will be forgotten afterwards in the hustle and bustle of voting, I wanted to take advantage of the time when we are all taking our seats to thank the parliamentary services for their exemplary cooperation in ensuring that the amendments and other documents in every language were delivered to us on time, After all, we have more than 1 000 amendments to consider, and I think it is only right to express our con-
Vi skal trods alt træffe beslutning om mere end
In connection with the crisis in the finance markets of Latin America, Commissioner Bangemann was scarcely mentioned and nobody else featured at all.
Vi går nu over til afstemning Ændringsforslag 808
Draft Amendment No 808 gratulations to the services and the House for completing - this mammoth task on time.
(Bifald) Ændringsforslag 714
Draft Amendment No 714
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), ordfører. - (ES) Fru formand, jeg anmoder om, at der stemmes om yderligere EUR 5 millioner i forpligtelsesbevillinger i forhold til det, der foreslås i Budgetudvalgets ændringsforslag, altså i alt EUR 45 millioner i forpligtelsesbevillinger for denne post.
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), rapporteur. - (ES) Madam President, I request that an additional EUR 5 million be approved in commitment appropriations above the sum proposed in the amendment by the Committee on Budgets, that is, a total of EUR 45 million in commitment appropriations for this line.
Ændringsforslag 810
Draft Amendment No 810
Ændringsforslag 844
Draft Amendment No 844
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), ordfører. - (ES) Fru formand, jeg anmoder om, at der for denne post stemmes om EUR 16,5 millioner i forpligtelsesbevillinger i stedet for det be løb, der foreslås i Budgetudvalgets ændringsforslag.
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), rapporteur. - (ES) Madam President, I request that EUR 16.5 million be approved in commitment appropriations for this line in place of the amount proposed in the amendment by the Committee on Budgets.
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), ordfører. - (ES) Fru formand, jeg så genie, at det fremgik af anmærkningen, at der på forhånd er tildelt et beløb på EUR 1,7 millioner til Euro pahuse.
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), rapporteur. - (ES) Madam President, I would like the remarks to note the amount of EUR 1.7 million preallocated to the International Federation of Europe Houses.
Ændringsforslag 738
Draft Amendment No 738
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), ordfører. - (ES) Fru formand, jeg anmoder om, at følgende bemærkning indføres: Denne bevilling er også beregnet til finansiering af foran staltninger til bekæmpelse af vold mod kvinder 1999.
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), rapporteur. - (ES) Madam President, I request that the following comment be in cluded: these appropriations are also aimed at financing the 1999 campaign on violence against women.
Ændringsforslag 741
Draft Amendment No 741
Formanden. - Vi går nu over til afstemning om æn dringsforslagene til sektion I.
President. - We shall now proceed to the vote on the amendments to Section I.
Hr. Martens, jeg giver Dem ordet.
Mr Martens has the floor.
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), ordfører. - (ES) Fru formand, jeg anmoder om, at der stemmes om yderligere EUR 3 millioner i forpligtelsesbevillinger, altså i alt 5 millioner for denne post.
Dührkop Dührkop (PSE), rapporteur. - (ES) Madam President, I request that an additional EUR 3 million be approved in commitment appropriations, that is, a total of EUR 5 million for this line.
Forslag til ændring nr. 584
Draft Amendment No 584
Martens (PPE). - (NL) Hr. formand, ærede kolleger, på grundlag af artikel 115, stykke 3, beder jeg på vegne af vores gruppe, hvad angår ændringsforslag 899, om først at stemme om den femte paragraf, der i den forbindelse giver medlemmernes vedtægt.
Martens (PPE). - (NL) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, on behalf of my group I should like to ask, on the basis of Rule 115(3), that we should first vote on the fifth paragraph of Amendment No 899 relating to the link with the Members' Statute.
Giv mig to minutter til at sige hvorfor.
Could I just take two minutes to explain why?
Müller (V). - (DE) Fru formand, jeg mener, det drejer sig om en fejltagelse.
Müller (V). - (DE) Madam President, I believe a mistake has been made.
Det er det oprindelige forslag fra min gruppe om at indsætte en reserve på 30 %, og jeg vil gerne understrege, at det ikke drejer sig om den betingelse, at den skal oprettes som ny, men om de betingelser, vi havde i forbindelse med reserven på 100 %, fordi én betingelse, nemlig fremsendelsen af materialet til de belgiske anklagemyndigheder, endnu ikke er opfyldt.
This is my group's original amendment, on the 30 % reserve, and I should like to emphasise that it does not relate to the condition for the establishment of this new reserve, but rather to the conditions we had for the 100 % reserve, because one of those conditions, namely the surrender of the documents to the Belgian prosecuting authorities, has not yet been fulfilled.
I de sidste 20 år har vi haft et system med faste rejsegodtgørelser.
For the last 20 years, we have had a system of flat-rate travel expenses.
På grundlag af rapporten fra Revisionsretten er dette system ikke længere gældende.
The Court of Auditors' report indicates that this is no longer acceptable.
Men vi må også til stræbe en retfærdig løsning, og den kan nemt findes ved at forbinde dem med medlemmernes vedtægt.
We need to find a fair so lution, and this is only possible if we link it to the Members' Statute.
Vores gruppe er modstander af et kompliceret og ugennemsigtigt system, som på det seneste har vist sig at være over ordentlig svært at forsvare over for den offentlige mening.
Our group is opposed to having a complex and untransparent system which, it has become clear, is extremely difficult to justify to the general public. s*-
For det andet, og jeg beder om opmærksomhed herfor, frygter vi, at hvis vi accepterer en overgangsordning, bliver det for visse medlemmer af Rådet en grund til ikke at godkende vedtægten.
Secondly, and this is something I would ask you to think seriously about, we fear that if we accept a transitional system, Certain members of the Council will use it as an excuse to reject the Statute.
Dell'Alba (ARE). - (FR) Fru formandjeg ved ikke, om jeg har forstået fra Müller ret.
Dell'Alba (ARE). - (FR) Madam President, I did not fully understand what Mrs Müller said.
Ønsker hun at fremsætte et mundtligt ændringsforslag i forbindelse med en lang og kompleks afstemning, må jeg modsætte mig det. Og jeg tror også, andre af Parlamentets medlemmer vil modsætte sig noget sådant.
If she wishes to make an oral amendment in a very complex and very long voting procedure, I will oppose it and I believe that other colleagues will also oppose it.
Lad os stemme om ændringsforslaget i den foreliggende form.
Let us vote on her amend ment as it stands.
Det er eneste forsvarlige frem gangsmåde i forbindelse med en så lang og kompleks af stemning.
This is the only way to proceed in such a complex vote.
Jeg anmoder således om, at fra Müllers oprindelige æn dringsforslag sættes under afstemning i den foreliggende form.
Therefore, I would like to ask you to put Mrs MUller's original amendment to the vote, as it stands.
Formanden. - Det er også min hensigt, hr. Dell'Alba.
President. - Yes, that is what I intended to do, Mr Dell'Alba.
Tak for Deres indlæg.
Thank you for your support.
Maij-Weggen (PPE). - (NL) Fru formand, burde vi ikke høre formanden for Budgetkontroludvalgets mening her?
Maij-Weggen (PPE). - (NL) Madam President, should we not hear the opinion of the chairman of the Committee on Budgetary Control here?
Han kan efter min vurdering bedst angive, hvad situationen bag ændringsforslaget helt præcist er.
She is surely in the best position to tell us what exactly is behind the amendment.
Denne vedtægt skal godkendes ved enstemmighed.
The Statute has to be adopted unanimously.
Parlamentet skal give et forslag, den Europæiske Kommission skal give et råd, og Rådet skal vedtage enstemmigt.
Parliament has to put forward a proposal, the Commission will de liver its opinion and the Council must reach a unanimous decision.
Vi frygter, at den retfærdige løsning, der nemt kan nås til overensstemmelse om med medlemmemes vedtægt, ikke kommer i orden, hvis vi accepterer en overgangsordning.
We fear that the fair solution that relies on link age with the Members' Statute will not be possible if we accept a transitional system.
Vi må derimod - og det er også en beslutning fra vores gruppe - på grundlag af Rothley-betænkningen udarbejde et forslag, som Parlamentet kan forelægge Det Europæiske Råd den 11. og 12. december i Wien.
What we need to do instead - and this is what my group has decided - is to formulate a proposal based on the Rothley report that Parliament can then put before the European Council on 11 and 12 December iri Vienna.
Vi indvilger altså i at godkende Rothley-betænkningen som grundlag for en interinstitutionel aftale.
We are therefore prepared to approve the Rothley report as the basis for an interinstitutional agreement.
Den eneste sikkerhed, vi har, er, at De, ærede kolleger, forud skal acceptere at
The only guarantee we have is if you, ladies and gentlemen, agree to vote on the fifth paragraph first and approve it.
Martens ridisk eller politisk belæg for at anmode om en ændring af afstemningsrækkefølgen.
Martens road towards, firstly, dismantling an untenable system and, secondly, establishing the Statute for Members.
Det slog han helt fast, også uformelt over for gruppeformændene, da han havde møde med os forleden dag efter invitation fra Dem, hr. formand.
I want to state clearly on behalf of the ELDR Group that we wish to maintain the order of vote as indicated.
Det, vi ser her, er et forsøg på at forvirre og gemme sig bag denne tilgang.
We all know in side each of our groups this is a difficult issue.
Cox (ELDR). ­ (EN) Hr. formand, en bemærkning til for­retningsordenen. Jeg vil geme klart understrege på vegne af ELDRgruppen, at vi ønsker at beholde den angivne af­stemningsrækkefølge.
Green (PSE). - Mr President, yesterday in this House Chancellor Klima of Austria made it clear that if there is a proposal from Parliament in time for the Vienna Sum mit in December, then he will present it to the Vienna Summit.
Vi ved allesammen i vores respek­tive grupper, at det er et vanskeligt spørgsmål.
What we see here is an attempt to obfuscate and hide behind this approach.
Vi må finde vo­res meningers mod og forsvare de forskelle.
My group is in favour.
Jeg lyttede til hr. Martens i stilhed.
I listened to Mr Martens, quietly.
Jeg venter, indtil der erro.
I will wait until the baying crowds cease.
Miri gruppe mener, at vi skal acceptere og fremme paral­lelismen og den stærke komplementaritet mellem en med­lemsstatut og en reform afrejsetilskud.
It is the position of my group that we accept and promote the parallelism and the strong complementarity between a Members' Statute and reform of the travel allowances.
Som landet ligger, tilfalder det dog Parlamentet selv at fastlægge sin egen ordning for rejsetilskud, mens det i statutsagen tilfalder ■ andre at sikre, at Parlamentet tager sig sammen i god tid før Wien.
However, in terms of the scheme of things, it is the re sponsibility of this House itself to determine the nature of its travel allowance system, whereas for the Statute it is the responsibility of others to ensure that this House gets its act together in time for Vienna.
Lad os i denne sag påtage os vores forpligtelser som Parlament på det område, hvor vi har fuldstændig be­myndigelse dertil, og lad os stemme i den angivne række­følge.
Let us assume our re sponsibilities as a House in the area where we have the complete authority to do so and let us vote in the order in dicated.
Formanden. ­ Jeg tror, det er unødvendigt at fortsætte denne diskussion, for i henhold til artikel 115, stk. 3, afsnit 2 i forretningsordenen, hr. Martens, skal formanden sikre sig, at der ikke gøres indsigelse af mindst 29 med­lemmer.
President -1 do not think it is necessary to continue this debate because the second paragraph of Rule 115(3) of the Rules of Procedure states, Mr Martens, that the President shall establish that it is not opposed by at least 29 Members.
Og jeg spørger Dem, om De fastholder Deres holdning, for jeg finder det helt tydeligt, at mindst 29 med­lemmer vil gøre indsigelse, men jeg har intet imod at tælle dem.
And I would ask you whether or not you are standing by your position, because it seems clear to me that it will be opposed by at least 29 Members, but I have no problem in counting them.
Hvis De siger, at De fastholder Deres holdning, vil jeg bede de medlemmer, der gør indsigelse, om at rejse sig, så vi hurtigt kan tælle dem.
If you tell me that you are standing by your position, I will ask the Members who are opposed to stand and we can count them in no time.
Sig mig så, hr. Martens, om De fastholder Deres holdning?
Are you standing by your position, Mr Martens?
Min gruppe går ind for afstemning.
My group is in favour of voting.
Vi stemmer om fri af­stemning, så de enkelte medlemmer af min gruppe har mulighed for selv at tage stilling i denne afgørende sag.
We will vote on a free vote so that every Member in my group will be able to make up their own mind on this critical issue.
Vi anmoder om, at afstemningen foretages i den angivne rækkefølge.
We will ask that the vote be taken in the order set out on the order sheet.
Vi går alle ind for en statut for medlemmerne her.
We are all in favour of a Members' Statute here.
Den eneste måde, vi fik det på dagsordenen i Amster­dam på ­ hvilket ændrede traktaten ­ var ved at ændre den politiske balance i Rådet.
The only way in which we got it on to the agenda in Am sterdam - which changed the Treaty - was by changing the political balance in the Council.
Derfor tager vi en del af æren for, at det i det mindste kom på dagsordenen i Amsterdam og med i traktaten.
So we take some credit for having at least got it on the agenda in Amsterdam and in the Treaty.
Vi mener nu, at vi er på rette vej mod en· medlemsstatut.
We now believe that we have the right way forward to pursue the Members' Statute.
Vi forfølger sagen i Udvalget om Ret­lige Anliggender og Borgemes Rettigheder.
We are pursuing it in the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights.
Som I ved, har vi ændret tidsplanen for at få det med på topmødet i Wien.
As you know, we have changed the timetable in order to get it included in the Vienna Summit.
Men vi mener også, at det er vigtigt, at vi melder ud politisk om vores mandat og klart tilkendegiver, at vi først handler efter Revisionsrettens ønske og dernæst, at vi i denne sag udviser fuldstændig åbenhed og gennem­sigtighed.
But we also believe it is important that we make a political statement about our credentials and our desire to make sure that firstly, we are acting as required by the Court of Auditors and secondly, that we are completely open and transparent on this issue.
I lyset af, at visse medlemmer i den modsatte side af salen her til morgen havde meget travlt med at fi­ske stemmer for hemmelig afstemning om dette, så er det da ironisk, at anmodningen kommer fra hr. Martens.
Knowing that some Members on the opposite side of the House were rushing around this morning, looking to get votes for a secret ballot on this re quest, I think this request is a bit rich, coming from Mr Martens.
Vi går ind for at beholde afstemningsrækkefølgen som angi­vet i tidsplanen.
We would like to retain the order of voting as on the timetable.
Martens (PPE). ­ (NL) Det er helt klart, at mere end 25 medlemmer er imod ændringen af afstemningen.
Martens (PPE). - (NL) It is clear that there are more than 25 Members opposed to changing the vote.
Jeg beder ganske enkelt om, at der under alle omstændigheder afstemmes separat om den femte paragraf.
All I am ask ing is that, whatever else happens, we should vote separately on the fifth paragraph.