natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det kan jeg gøre, det er ikke noget problem for mig, men jeg synes, at der så måske bliver tale om spild af tid.
I can, I do not have a problem with that, but it strikes me as perhaps being a waste of time.
Kommissionen modtog den 30. april oplysninger fra de franske myndigheder om, at man havde registreret et betydeligt antal tilfælde, hvor vogntog med brændstoffer på vej mod genbehandlingsanlægget i Haag udviste en overskridelse af grænsen på 4 becquerel per kvadratcentimenter for ikke fastbundet betaforurening.
For this reason, I want to go into these individual questions in greater detail and to state once again that we are unable to accept all the amendments. This is partly because certain amendments either repeat or pick up issues, such as health protection, which have already been dealt with in sufficient detail elsewhere and do not need to be revisited in relation to the legal guarantees for UMTS.
Da nogle af de pågældende vogntog kom fra nukleare el værker i Tyskland, blev der hurtigt iværksat mere detalje rede undersøgelser, ikke kun af Frankrig, men også af Tyskland.
We are, nevertheless, accepting seven amendments un changed, Nos 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 and 11, along with Amend ment No 7 in principle and Amendment No 6 in part.
Hermed har jeg vist været inde på de væsentlige spørgsmål, som er blevet stillet.
So, I have dealt with the most important questions which were asked.
Lige et par ord mere til slut om vores oplæg.
Finally, a few closing words on our draft.
Jeg kommer lige i tanker om, hr. Rübig, at der ikke er nogen risiko for, at vi eller de firmaer, der ar bejder i Europa, kunne blive tvunget til at tilpasse sig ja panske standarder. Deter omvendt!
It occurs to me, Mr Rübig, that there is no danger that either we or companies working in Europe may be forced to adapt to Japanese standards.
Alle de japanske standarder, vi til dato har fået kendskab til, og også reaktionerne fra det japanske ministerium for international handel og industri samt fra postministeriet viser, at Japan vil overtage den standard, vi eller ETSI vælger.
All the Japanese standards we know about at the moment, and the reactions from the MITI Ministry and the Ministry of Post and Telecommunications, indicate that Japan is likely to adopt the standards chosen either by us or by the ETSI.
Det skyldes til dels, at vi under udarbejdelsen af standarderne kunne gøre brug af japanske og også amerikanske firmaers medarbejde, så at det virkelig allerede i kimen er langt mere end en europæisk standard.
This is,' in part, due to the fact that in drafting these standards we were able to work together with Japanese and US firms, and so in its approach the document is actually far more than a European standard.
Kommissionen har bevaret kontakten til de kompetente franske og tyske myndigheder for at følge resultaterne af disse undersøgelser, der endnu ikke er afsluttede.
So, let us move on to these individual questions which Mr van Velzen has once again asked.
Vi kan derfor fastslå, at medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder reagerede ansvarligt for at rette op på situationen, så snart man blev klar over problemerne. Kom missionen bevarer på sin side kontakten til de berørte
I have already dealt with them in committee and on other occasions.
Heraf kan De se, at vi har en god mulighed for ikke kun at gentage GSM-succesen, men måske endog for at overgå den.
So, as you can see, we have a good chance of not only re peating the success of GSM, but perhaps even of surpassing it.
Vi vil i de fortsatte samtaler, navnlig med den amerikanske industri og den amerikanske administration, gøre opmærksom på, at UMTS ikke er en tvungen stan dard, som Kommissionen eller Parlamentet og Rådet har foreslået, men at standarden, som altid i henhold til vores gode tradition er blevet udarbejdet af industrien.
In further discussions, in particular with US industry and the US administration, we will stress the fact that UMTS is not a mandatory standard proposed by the Com mission or by Parliament and the Council but, as ever, an industry-devised standard in our usual tradition.
Det er en standard, som alle kan, men ikke skal tilslutte sig.
It is a standard which anyone can adopt, but no-one is forced to adopt.
Vi har ganske vist den bestemte politiske vilje til af hensyn til forbrugerne og af hensyn til et så ensartet marked som mulig og dermed først og fremmest af hensyn til, at priserne skal være overkommelige, at sørge for, at en sådan standard så også finder det virkefelt, den fortjener.
However, in the interests of consumers and in the interests of creating as uniform a market as possible - and thereby above all reasonable prices -, we must persuade the various political wills that a standard of this kind will achieve the scope of influence it deserves. That means that everyone is invited to use it and therefore everyone
Det vil sige, at alle indbydes til at benytte den, og gennem de der med forbundne fordele skal de overbevises om, at de bør benytte den. Det er den gode politik, der har bragt os langt frem på dette område, og jeg takker for Parlamentets støtte.
As far as the increase in frequencies is concerned, as I re marked recently in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, it is simply a mat ter of method and of course we have already gathered, and will continue to gather, relevant experiences.
Spørgsmålet har endvidere været diskuteret på mødet den 18. maj i den permanente arbejdsgruppe for sikkerhed ved transport af radioaktivt materiale, og oplysningerne fra en analyse af situationen er blevet sendt til de kompetente myndigheder i medlemsstaterne.
Furthermore, the issue was discussed at a meeting of the Permanent Working Group on the Safety of Transportation of Radioactive Substances, on 18 May and lessons to be drawn from their analysis of the situa tion have been passed on to the relevant authorities of the Member States.
ansvarlige så ved den? Lod de bevidst hånt om denne vi den, og hvilke konsekvenser får det for dem nu?
If we do, and if we have agreed this draft, there are no further legal obstacles.
Kommissionen vil på nuværende tidspunkt ikke foreslå øjeblikkelige ekstraforanstaltninger.
At the current stage, the Commission proposes no further immediate measures.
Dog vil man, som det allerede er blevet bemærket, hele tiden i de pågældende lande overveje tiltag, der skal sikre en korrekt over holdelse af EU's lovgivning.
Nevertheless, as has already been noted, measures aimed at assuring the correct application of European Union legislation are still being studied by the Member States concerned.
Endvidere studerer Kom missionen de forhold, der ligger til grund for den konstaterede situation, også selvom de korrigerende aktiviteter ser ud til at være blevet igangsat øjeblikkeligt.
Furthermore, the Commission is concerned about the circumstances which were at the origin of the situation observed, even if corrective measures seem to have been implemented promptly.
For øjeblikket er atomindustrien, som i årevis har vidst, at atombrændstoftransportbeholdere sveder, ikke længere en samtalepartner jeg kan have tillid til.
President - The next item is the statement by the Com mission on transport of nuclear waste in the European Un ion.
Jeg kræver af Kommissionen, at den sikrer, at der i til fælde af grænseoverskridende transport af radioaktivt af fald indføres kontrolforanstaltninger, ensartede standarder og anmeldelsespligt ved grænserne.
Consequently, when the full results of the inquiries at na tional level have been communicated to the Commission, it envisages an impartial overall study of the situation not only in France and Germany but in all the Member States likely to be affected.
Derfor har Kommissionen planer om, når den har modtaget samtlige resultater fra undersøgelserne udført på nationalt plan, meget hurtigt at foretage en samlet undersøgelse af situationen, ikke blot i Frankrig og Tyskland, men i alle de medlemsstater, der kan tænkes at ville blive berørt.
Oreja, Member of the Commission. - (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, on 30 April the Commission re ceived information from the French authorities indicating that a significant number of cases had been registered in which fuel casks being transported to the reprocessing plant at la Hague, France exceeded the limit of 4 becquerels per square centimetre for unfixed beta gamma con tamination.
Lange (PSE). - (DE) Hr. formand, hr. kommissær, i den sidste tid er det faktisk gået op for offentligheden, at ikke kun vi sveder, når vi arbejder her, men at også atombrændstoftransportbeholdere sveder.
Lange (PSE). - (DE) Mr President, Commissioner, the public has in fact just recently learnt that we are not the only ones who sweat working here, but that flasks sweat too.
Det, at atombrændstoftransportbeholdere sveder, indebærer faktisk en risiko for mennesker.
These sweating flasks actually put people's lives at risk.
De sagde, at der bestemt ingen risiko var.
You have said that there is no risk.
Det er ikke helt rigtigt.
That is not quite true.
Når de hot spots, hvor denne sved koncentreres, kommer i berøring med dele af det menneskelige legeme, udsættes disse mennesker for en risiko.
If the hot spots where this sweat concentrates come into contact with the human body, these people are at risk.
Der er jo nogle, der arbejder der, og andre overvåger disse atombrændstoftransportbeholdere.
Some of them work on these flasks and others watch over them.
De sveder i øvrigt ikke, fordi de overvåges. Ergo er der en reel risiko.
Not that they sweat because they are being watched.
Jeg kræver af Kommissionen, at den griber ind af hensyn til borgerne og ikke bliver medskyldig i en atomindustri, som prøver på at føre energipolitik imod et flertal i den europæiske befolkning!
The Commission has remained in contact with the relevant French and German authorities, in order to monitor the results of these studies which have not yet been com peted.
Det mærkelige ved hele denne historie er imidlertid, at of fentligheden først nu har hørt, at atombrændstoftransportbeholdere sveder, men de, der står bag, har vidst det i lang tid og målt det for længe siden.
What is remarkable in this whole story, however, is that the public has only just found out about these sweating flasks, while the people who operate the flasks have known about it for a long time and have been measuring the sweating for a long time.
Nu spørger jeg Dem, hr. kommissær: De hedder da ikke Hase!
So now let me put the question to you, Mr Commissioner.
De har en stå ende arbejdsgruppe.
You must know some thing!
De drøfter transporterne!
You have a standing working group.
Det er et fællesskab, der har aflagt troskabsed, med informationssammenhænge.
You discuss transport matters. It is a close community with its ear to the ground.
Nej, måske skulle jeg al ligevel kalde Dem Hase!
No, maybe you do not know anything!
Dét kan jeg simpelthen ikke forestille mig.
The whole thing is quite inconceivable.
Vi taler om en mindre grad af overfladekontaminering, og jeg vil opfordre til, at vi ikke lader denne sag komme ud af proportioner.
It clearly emerges from the results which are currently available that neither staff nor the population were subjected to exposure to radiation in excess of the limits set at Community level.
Ved at skabe bekymring, forværrer vi offentlighedens frygt for disse sager i urimelig grad.
In fact, any exposure resulting from the excess contamination of the flasks corresponded to no more than a fraction of the current limits.
Derfor vil jeg gerne have nøje besked om følgende: Hvad vidste Kommissionen hvornår?
For this reason I should like to know in greater detail ex actly what the Commission knew and when.
Når jeg ser på Deres nye meddelelse om arbejdet i denne stående arbejdsgruppe, formuleres det meget vagt deri, at der ikke skulle være no gen risiko, for antallet af episoder og uheld var lavt og følgerne begrænsede.
Looking at your new statement on the work of this standing working group, it says very vaguely that there was no risk because these incidents and accidents were few in number and limited in consequence.
Jeg vil gerne have at vide, hvad for uheld og episoder det var med atombrændstoftransportbeholdere?
Please, exactly what accidents and incidents happened with the flasks?
Jeg mener, at den afgørende brist i sikkerheden netop er her.
This is where I think the vital security leak lies.
Der var åbenbart nogle, der vidste noget, men som ikke lod denne viden gå videre til offentligheden. den.
There were obviously some people who knew something but chose not to share this knowledge with the public.
Chichester endnu en ubehagelig episode i den fortsatte saga om atomkraftværkerne Sellafield og Thorp.
That seems to me to be quite an achievement and a step in the right direction.
Det ser jeg som en stor præstation og et skridt i den rigtige retning.
And what conclusions should they now draw?
Det virkelige spørgsmål er: var det farligt for offentligheden? Nej.
The real question here is: was there any danger to the public? No.
Var det farligt for operatørerne og det personale, der var involveret?
Was there any danger to the operators and the staff involved?
Kan vi lære no get af det?
Are there lessons to be learned?
Ja - der er brug for større åbenhed.
Yes - there needs to be more openness.
Det er et nyttigt resultat af denne øvelse.
That is a useful outcome of this exercise.
Men lad os først og frem mest ikke blive alt for ivrige efter at ringe med alarmklokkerne.
But above all, let us not go overboard in sounding alarmist about this.
Andre industrier har langt større problemer, der ikke får nær samme opmærksomhed som noget, der har med ordet »nuklear« at gøre.
Other in dustries have far worse instances of difficulty which do not get the same attention as anything to do with the word 'nuclear'.
Det finder jeg beklageligt.
I think that is regrettable.
Så jeg hilser redegørelsen velkommen og håber, at tingene ikke kommer ud af proportioner.
So I welcome the statement and hope we will not let matters get out of pro portion.
Jeg finder bemærkningerne fra en videnskabsmand ved navn Dr. Sue Lon - der er BNFL's drifts-og teknologidirektør - om, at Det Forenede Kongeriges sikkerhedsstatistik kan tåle en grundig kontrol, temmelig usmagelige. Hvis BNFL havde en sådan førsteklasses statistik vedrørende sundhed og sikkerhed, hvorfor har hummerne i nogle områder af østkysten så et forureningsniveau der er 247 gange større end i 1993?
As for the industry, it is not just because certain best-sellers are doing big business at the moment that I should · quote Lenin, but the motto 'confidence is good, control is better' seems very apt in this case with the hushing up of security problems and accidents, particularly in the nuclear industry, so topical.
Hvis Sellafield synker, så går vi alle ned med det. Hvis den britiske nu kleare industri er en sådan mønsterprofession, hvorfor vil BNFL så ikke lade Europa-Kommissionen foretage en uafhængig evaluering af dens drift og den bemyndigelse, som stammer fra EURATOM-traktaten?
As far as I can see, at the moment the nuclear industry, which has known about these sweating flasks for years, is no longer a reliable source of information.
Det blev bemærket af strålingsbeskyttelsesinstituttet i Irland i 1994, præcist ét år efter at briterne gav BNFL den licens, der er grunden til det miljømæssige rod, vi står med i dag.
I urge the Commission to make sure that if there is to be cross-border transportation of radioactive waste, that checks, uniform standards and a reporting duty should be introduced.
Eisma (ELDR). - (NL) Hr. formand, jeg finder kommissær Orejas svar meget utilfredsstillende.
Eisma (ELDR). - (NL) Mr President, I consider Com missioner Oreja's reply to be very unsatisfactory.
Han siger: Vi vil ikke i øjeblikket træffe supplerende forholdsregler og det på trods af, at to medlemsstater, Frankrig og Tyskland, har indført totalforbud mod transport af nukleart affald.
He says that we will not take any additional measures at present, while two Member States, France and Germany, have an nounced a total ban on the transportation of nuclear waste.
Så siger Kommissionen: Vi foretager os intet på trods af, at der er tretten andre medlemsstater, hvoraf nogle kon fronteres med lignende problemer.
The response of the Commission is not to do anything at all, although there are 13 other Member States, some of which face similar problems.
Kig engang på det vi alle sammen anmoder om i den fælles beslutning, der lig ger foran Dem.
Just look at all the questions we ask in the present joint resolution.
Jeg skal ikke opsummere alt det, vi anmoder Kommissionen om for at forbedre situationen, for så bruger jeg al min taletid.
I will not list all our questions to the Commission about improving the situa tion because this would take more time than I have been allocated.
Men kig engang på punkt 4, 7, 8, 11 osv. Spørgsmål, som vi kræver svar på fra Kommissionen.
But you could take a look at paragraphs 4, 7, 8,
Kan vi måske få svar på det?
II and so on.
Spørgsmål, som vi fremsætter i en fælles beslutning.
We would really like a response from the Commission on these matters. Could we have some an swers please?
Det er op til Kommissionen at tage fat i problemet.
These are questions where we ask the Com mission in a joint resolution to tackle the problem.
Seppänen (GUE/NGL). - (FI) Hr. formand, jeg ser, at den tidligere taler har lært at læse, men han har ikke lært at holde op med at læse.
At the end of the day this is just another example of the fact that there is no absolutely safe final storage for nuclear waste. It is simply pushed back and forth across borders.
Vi har for nylig fået beviser for, hvordan Pakistan og In dien ved hjælp af smugling, tyveri og bestikkelse har skaffet sig adgang til materialer til fremstilling af en nu klear bombe.
I welcome this statement from the Com missioner. We are dealing with an industry which is very highly regulated, one of most regulated industries in Eu rope, and we must take cognizance of the fact that con trary to what my colleague suggested, the containment in these flasks was not breached.
Jeg ville gerne ønske, at europæerne kunne stole på dem, som driver kernekraftværker, så kernekraftværkerne ikke vil udgøre risici for befolkningen.
It is true that if an industry is highly regulated, it has a duty to inform the public, as well as the authorities, and arguably it should be like Caesar's wife, that is to say, quite beyond reproach, and should take all steps to inform people of the situation.
Jeg må sige: Det er en skandale, at der er givet så lidt in formation om denne transport og de dertil knyttede risici for sundheden. Jeg har allerede nævnt, at to medlemsstater har standset transporterne, men også Nederlandene skal gøre dette.
I must say that it is scandalous that so little information has been released about this transport and the health risks it entails.
For nu viser det sig pludseligt, at centralerne i Borselen og Dodewaard, i mit eget land, transporterer deres affald til La Hague og Sellafield med de samme risici.
The Netherlands should do likewise because it has suddenly come to light that the power sta tions in Borselen and Dodewaard, located in my own country, have also shipped their waste to La Hague and Sellafield, with similar risks.
De tønder, som det nukleare affald trans porteres i, viser sig at have et alt for stort strålings-og for ureningsniveau.
The containers in which the nuclear waste is shipped have been shown to have excessively high levels of radiation and contamination.
Derfor skal også transporten i mit land, i Nederlandene, stoppes så længe der ikke er mere klarhed.
The transport in my own country of the Netherlands should also be halted for as long as this situation remains unclear.
Men det er ikke nok, hr. formand, det giver anledning til store bekymringer, at der så længe er tiet om disse for hold.
But even this is not enough, Mr President, because it is very frightening that such matters have been concealed.
Det er derfor meget vigtigt, at der kommer mere åbenhed og kontrol med transporten af nukleart affald.
More openness and control with respect to nuclear trans port is therefore of the utmost importance.
Kommissionen skal så hurtigt som muligt præsentere en plan herom og forelægge den for vores udvalg.
The Commission must present a plan and submit it to our committee as soon as possible.
Når hav bunden i nærheden af Sellafield er fuld af nukleart affald, og duerne omkring oparbejdningsfabrikken ifølge tysk lov skal betragtes som forurenede med radioaktivt affald, så mener jeg, at en diskussion er mere end nødvendig.
According to German law, the seabed off Sellafield, with its nuclear waste, and even the pigeons around the reprocessing plant, must be classified as 'contaminated with radioactive waste'.
De daglige udledninger fra atomkraftværket ved Sellafield skønnes nu at være på 9 millioner t nukleart affald.
The daily discharges from the nuclear plant at Sellafield
Bloch von Blottnitz (V). - (DE) Hr. formand, det ville have klædt Kommissionen, om den havde læst sine egne papirer, f.eks. meddelelsen af 3.4.1996, KOM(96) 11.
My understanding is that there has been some expression of regret and contrition on the part of the utilities in Ger many and the transport organization.
Al lerede deri står der ordret, at der fra ydersiden af beholde ren - kaldet atombrændstoftransportbeholder - sker en kontamination i vandet. De har altså vidst det allerede si-
Although, as I un derstand it, they did not breach the disclosure require ments, because the levels of contamination were not that great - and I welcome the Commissioner making that point - nevertheless it would have been better if all information had been made public because more information, not less, is better for restoring and establishing public confidence in the nuclear industry.
Bloch von Blottnitz den 1996, og nu vil de her erklære os for ubegavede og hævde, at de først har vidst det siden april!
Fitzsimons are now estimated at nine million tonnes of nuclear waste.
Der findes for øvrigt et working paper nr. 4 fra den tekniske komité 996 6 96, hvori der allerede blev stillet detaljerede forslag om dette emne, og de indgik dernæst i AIO's safety series, der igen arbejder tæt sammen med den tekniske komité.
The recent application by BNFL to the British Govern ment for increased area discharges is another unpleasant episode in the ongoing saga of Sellafield and Thorp nuclear plants.
Lukas (NI). - (DE) Hr. formand, spørgsmålet om de europæiske borgeres sikkerhed i forbindelse med trans port af radioaktive stoffer er naturligvis af meget stor be tydning.
Commission, No 11. Because it states, word for word, that the outside of the packaging - referred to as a 'fuel transport container' causes contamination in water.
Men emnet kan alligevel kun opfattes som en de talje af en forgrenet samlet problematik, der skal tages yderst alvorlig.
You have known this since 1996, and now you stand there in front of us acting dumb and claiming you have only known since April!
Så længe også spørgsmålet om foreløbig og endelig oplagring er helt uafklaret, skal der siges klart nej til alle aktiviteter med henblik på ibrugtagning af nye atomkraftværker eller fortsat drift af forældede anlæg.
Incidentally, there is also a working paper No 4 from Technical Committee 996 6 96 which makes detailed proposals on this subject which have been included in the safety series produced by the AIO with whom you also work closely.
Når De nu her fortæller os, at grænseværdierne kun er blevet overskredet i ringe grad, bliver jeg nødt til at spørge Dem, om De anser os for at være helt åndssvage?
So, if you're trying to tell us now that the limit values were only slightly exceeded, I have to ask you whether you think we are absolutely stupid.
Vi har grænseværdier på 4 becquerel/cm2, og i mellemtiden har vi målt kontaminationer på 50 000 becquerel.
The limit values are 4 becquerels/cm2and we are looking at recorded contamination levels of 50,000 becquerels.
De har nemlig bare ventet så længe i håb om, at industrien løser problemet.
The only reason you have waited so long is that you were hoping the industry would solve the problem.
Men kontaminationen har været stadig stigende.
Except that the contamination has kept on increasing.