natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg lykønsker hr. Linkohr med hans stædighed og alle de medlemmer, som har deltaget i forligsudvalgene.
Mr Linkohr, I congratulate you on your perseverance, as I do everybody who has taken part in the Conciliation Committee meetings.
Jeg vil ikke endnu engang gøre opmærksom på, at vi ikke er glade for resultatet, men jeg vil i stedet understrege det positive, og der er positive ting.
I do not want to dwell on the fact that we are not pleased with the result. I prefer to emphasize the positive aspects, which do exist.
På trods af dette meget negative resultat vil min gruppe stemme for, fordi beslutningen er taget og forliget indgået, så det desværre ikke mere er muligt at gøre andet.
Despite this very unsatisfactory result my group will vote in favour, because the decision has been taken and consultation has taken place and unfortunately there is nothing more to be done.
Bloch von Blottnitz (V). - (DE) Fru formand, ærede kolleger, dette er jo naturligvis i sandhed ingen succeshistorie, for det første på grund af midlernes størrelse og for det andet på grund af opdelingen.
Bloch von Blottnitz (V). - (DE) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, this is certainly no success story, either from the point of view of the amount of funding or its allocation.
ECU 9 millioner yderligere til vedvarende energi, det er ikke længere en vittighed, det er en tragedie.
An extra ECU 9 million for renewable energies is not a joke, it is a tragedy.
Forholdet mellem det, vi
The relationship between what we know about climate change and what we are willing to spend in this area is really laughable.
Imidlertid har vi åbnet flere linjer: Der er ECU 115 millioner mere - der var heller ikke tid til at forhandle mere, for Udvalget, Generaldirektorat XII, ville ikke have haft tid til at råde over og anvende disse midler
Nevertheless, we have opened up several lines: we have an extra ECU 115 million. There was no time to negotiate more than this because the Commission - Directorate-General XII - would not have had time to prepare these resources and make proper use of them.
budgetterede udgifters samlede sum.
Regarding Parliament's team itself, we had a lot of difficulty.
Sandheden vil fremgå af slutresultatet.
The conditions under which we have to work in these procedures are not ideal.
Jeg håber, at vores kolleger i Budgetudvalget vil tage dette punkt op eventuelt gennem en mindre initiativbetænkning eller lignende for at påvise, hvad der i sidste ende sker med disse ECU 85 millioner.
We did not get the agreement across the political groups that we should have had for such an important issue.
Det var reelt kernen i sagen, og vi kunne ikke overbevise Rådet.
I hope that we will carry those lessons forward when we come to the fifth frame work programme.
Det andet punkt er i sig selv naturligvis glædeligt.
to change it.
Det er klart, at ECU 15 millioner mere til forskning i, hvordan man på mere effektiv vis kan fjerne landminer, er godt.
All the while we are spending enormous sums of money on investigating something whose origins we have known about for ages.
Men samtidig fremstilles, sælges og udlægges der nye hver dag. Alene i det tidligere Jugoslavien er der brug for USD 40, 5 millioner for at fjerne de miner, som hidtil er blevet lagt ud.
The facts are obvious: if for the sake of sheer greed we want to turn a cud-chewing animal into a feeder on carrion, then we have got it all wrong.
Rådet afviste faktisk overhovedet at drøfte fordelingen.
We follow this up by doing something different along just the same lines.
Kalder man dette fælles beslutningstagning, ville andre ord være mere dækkende. Vi hár overhovedet ikke drøftet fordelingen.
We have made mistakes - with political approval - and now we are trying to catch up by spending the few funds available - and here I am referring to tax money, which itself does not grow on trees - in the hope of damping down the flames.
Vores arbejdsbetingelser er ikke ideelle ved disse procedurer.
I am not impressed by this approach, in fact I am absolutely against it.
Jeg håber, at vi har lært noget af dette, når vi kommer til det femte rammeprogram.
For this reason, Mr Linkohr, it is going to be very difficult for us indeed to support your report tomorrow.
Så bliver man lidt skuffet, når man ser, hvor lidt penge det er blevet til.
It is therefore a little disappointing to see how little money has been added.
Man må vel sige, at det, der satses penge på, f.eks. informationsteknologi, vedvarende energi og indsatser mod landminer, er vældig godt, men det er langtfra tilstrækkeligt.
People may well say that the things money is being invested in, such as information technology, renew able sources of energy and work against land-mines, are very good, but that is far from sufficient.
Jeg vil gerne opfølge det, som min kollega Block von Blottnitz tog op, og spørge kommissær Bangemann: Er risikoen ikke stor for, at disse penge til BSE bliver spildt, så længe man ikke ændrer EU's landbrugspolitik? Det er jo den, der er kernen!
I would like to refer to the matter raised by my colleague Mrs Block von Blottnitz and ask Commissioner Bangemann whether there is not a great risk that this money for BSE will be wasted as long as the EU's agricultural policy is not reformed.
Jeg håber virkelig, at Kommissionen begynder med denne ændring af landbrugspolitikken, så vi kommer til rette med dette problem.
I really hope the Commission starts the reform of the agricultural policy so that we get to grips with this problem.
Jeg ved godt, at få penge er bedre end ingen penge.
I know that some money is better than none.
Det fortalte min bedstemor mig i sin tid: En spurv i hånden er bedre end ti på taget.
As my grandmother used to say, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
Men vi er nødt til snart at overveje, i hvilken retning man vil gå, og ikke hvordan vi gør det her.
But surely the time has come for us to take a good look at the direction we should be going in, and this is not it.
Hvad angår landminerne, tvinges politikerne ikke tilstrækkeligt resolut til at være imod dem.
As far as landmines are concerned, there seems to be not enough pressure on our political thinking to force a change.
Man argumenterer endda for, at der skabes arbejdspladser ved produktion og salg af dem.
I have even heard the argument that the production and marketing of these devices creates jobs.
Så giver vi igen de penge ud, som vi har vundet på arbejdspladser, for at finde ud af, hvordan vi kan nedlægge dem.
The money earned from these jobs is then spent on finding out how to get rid of the products they created.
Det er en vanvittig politik!
This is madness!
Men når det drejer sig om hovedsagen, vedvarende energi og fremtidens teknologi, har vi kun almisser til overs til disse områder.
As usual, there is then nothing but pennies left over for the important things, namely renewable energies and future technologies.
Det er en skændsel!
This is a disgrace.
Tak for Deres højmodighed!
Thank you for your generosity!
Adam (PSE). - (EN) Fru formand, det er bestemt rigtigt, at vi øger forskningsprogrammet med ECU 115 millioner som følge af denne betænkning, men det skal ses i relation til det oprindelige vejledende beløb på ECU 700 millioner.
Adam (PSE). - Madam President, it is certainly true that we are adding ECU 115 million to the research pro gramme as a result of this report, but that has to be seen in the context of the original indicative figure of ECU 700 million.
Der er en stor forskel her.
There is a big difference here.
Selvom vi støtter og sætter stor pris på hr. Linkohrs arbejde i denne sammenhæng, er der helt klar stor skuffelse over slutresultatet af denne procedure.
Although we support and are very appreciative of the work that Mr Linkohr has done on this, it is clear a lot of disappoint ment exists about the eventual outcome of the process.
For en gang skyld ligger min sympati måske mere hos fru Plooij-van Gorsel og fru Bloch von Blottnitz, end det normalt er tilfældet under drøftelserne i vores udvalg.
For once, my sentiments are perhaps more with Mrs Plooijvan Gorsel and Mrs Bloch von Blottnitz than is normally the case in the deliberations of our committee.
Da man i april 1994 indgik den første fælles beslutning mellem Parlamentet og Rådet, var to af de 12 lande imod tildelingen af et beløb på ECU 12,359 milliarder.
When in April 1994 the first joint decision was reached between Parliament and the Council, two countries were opposed to the granting of a sum of ECU 12,359 billion.
Indtil det sidste var to lande modstandere, nemlig Det Forenede Kongerige - hvilket jeg blot minder om - og Tyskland.
The two countries were opposed right up to the last minute: the United Kingdom - I mention this as a reminder - and Germany.
Disse to lande tilsluttede sig til sidst den fælles holding med ordene: Vi kan være enige i beløbet, men vi vil ikke præsentere det således.
These two countries finally came round to the common position, saying they could agree to the sum but it should not be presented as such.
Først er der 11,700 milliarder og derefter 700 milliarder, som vil blive genfinansieret under vejs.
There would be ECU 11,700 billion, and then ECU 700 million would be refinanced as things went along.
Det meget vigtige punkt, som fru McNally fremførte, var, at Budgetudvalget havde stillet et samlet beløb på ECU 200 millioner til rådighed.
The very important point that Mrs McNally brought out was that the Committee on Budgets had made available a total of ECU 200 million.
Vi anvender kun ECU 115 millioner heraf.
We are only spending ECU 115 million of that.
Resultatet afspejler således ikke Parlamentets prioritering.
So the result does not reflect the financial priorities of Parliament.
Hvad sker der med de øvrige ECU 85 millioner?
What is going to happen to the other ECU 85 million?
Der var stor diskussion om dette under forligsproceduren og nogen uenighed.
There was a lot of discussion about this in the conciliation process and some disagreement.
Formanden for Budgetudvalget udtrykte sig i stærke vendinger, da han sagde, at de penge alligevel ville blive brugt på områder, som Parlamentet prioriterer lavere.
The chairman of the Committee on Budgets put it very strongly that this money would be spent anyway on lesser priorities as Parliament saw it.
Ministerrådets repræsentanter følte helt klart, at de faktisk opnåede en besparelse på de
The Council of Ministers' representatives clearly felt that they were actually making a saving in the overall total of budget expenditure.
Vi kan i dag konstatere, at ikke alene har Rådet ikke opfyldt sine forpligtelser, men det er stadig disse to lande, der indtil sidste øjeblik har forhindret os i at opnå mere betydelige beløb, til trods for, at de finansielle overslag ikke er blevet revideret.
Today let us confirm not only that the Council has not met its commitments, but that there are still these two countries which, up to the last moment, have prevented us from obtaining larger sums, notwithstanding the fact that the financial perspectives have not been revised.
Det er således en helt ekstraordinær situation.
It is therefore a totally extraordinary situation.
Jeg vil gerne gøre opmærksom på dette skråplan.
Commission in this matter.
Til alle dem, der i dag og ikke uden grund finder resultatet lidt magert, vil jeg foreslå, og dette vil ikke komme som en overraskelse for mine venner fra Den Socialistiske Gruppe, et kinesisk ordsprog, der siger »Det er bedre at tænde et lys end at bande over mørket«. Lad os derfor stemme for det lys, som Rolf Linkohr tænder.
To all those who find the result rather feeble today, and not without reason, I offer - and this will not surprise my colleagues in the Socialist Group - a Chinese proverb, which says: 'It is better to light a candle than curse the darkness'.
Til forskel fra andre former for industriel ophavsret - som vi kunne kalde funktionel industriel ophavsret - der vedrører apparater, som fungerer, ting, der kører, indeholder mønstre et kunstnerisk element.
of industrial property, which could be termed functional -being concerned with making things work, design introduces an artistic element.
Man kunne sige, at det er den kunstneriske ophavsret inden for det intellektuelle system.
You could say it is artistic property and should be considered an aspect of intellectual property.
Derfor er vi ikke så interesseret i, om maskinen fungerer, men om dens udseende - det synlige - udgør en harmonisk helhed.
Therefore, we are not so much interested in whether the machine works or not, as that its visible appearance should contribute to a harmonious overall effect.
Her spiller de elementer, som vi kunne kalde kunstnerisk ophavsret mere end egentlig industriel op havsret, ind.
So there are elements here that could be termed artistic property rather than industrial property, strictly speaking.
Bangemann, medlem af Kommissionen. - (DE) Fru for mand, bortset fra, at delegationen fra Parlamentet kæmpede bravt ifølge mine informationer - måske kan man kæmpe endnu bedre, men den opnåede jo immervæk dette resultat - så kan jeg godt forstå, at man spørger sig selv: Hvad skal vi nu stille op med det?
Bangemann, Member of the Commission. - (DE) Madam President, despite the fact that the parliamentary delegation managed to hold its own, from what I have heard -maybe there is even more to come, but it did get results -I can still well understand why people are asking: What do we do now?
Spørgsmålet bliver dog relativt enkelt, hvis man ser på de forskellige alternativer, som fru McNally skildrede.
Yet when one bears in mind the various alternatives, as outlined by Mrs McNally, then the question becomes a relatively simple one.
Direktivet henviser ikke til en konkret form for juridisk beskyttelse af mønstre, men omfatter i stedet alle former. Vi taler f.eks. om beskyttelse af tekstil-, glas, plasticmønstre, mønstre af enhver type, som et industriprodukt kan have på et givet tidspunkt.
The Directive is not restricted to the legal protection of a specific type of design, but covers them all.
Direktivet har disse generelle karakteristika, men jeg tror, man må skelne mellem to problemtyper: Problemer vedrørende mønsterudformningens generelle egenskaber og pro blemer vedrørende en konkret sag, det berømte tilfælde med reservedele.
That is the nature of the Directive in general, but I think the problems fall into two classes: those concerning the general properties of the design, and those which specifically concern the notorious question of spare parts.
Vi er - jeg har lige forvisset mig herom endnu engang -nået så langt med forarbejdet på alle punkterne, at pen gene kan deles ud næste år.
We have - and I have checked this out - made so much progress in the preliminary work connected with all these matters, that the money can now be distributed next year.
Det vil sige, at vi til næste år har 115 millioner mere til rådighed.
This means that next year we have an extra ECU 115 million available.
Nu kan man jo sige til sig selv: Det er ikke, hvad vi forventede.
One might now say that this is not what we expected.
Men hvis man afviser resultatet nu eller indleder en yderligere procedure med fælles beslutningstagning, så vil man ikke kunne uddele pengene til næste år, det er fuldstændig klart.
However, if this solution is now rejected, or another codecision procedure is initiated, then it will not be possible to distribute the money next year, that is obvious.
Jeg tror derfor, at det er bedre at acceptere resultatet her.
I therefore believe that the best policy is to accept this deal.
Hvad angår det første generelle problem - industrimønsterbeskyttelsens funktion via et harmoniseringsdirektiv -har jeg indtryk af, at der ikke er tilstrækkelig differentiering, og dette har fået Rådet til at tro, at sagen kunne løses ved at sætte det andet problem vedrørende reservedele i parentes.
It seems to me that there are not too many differences of opinion about the first, more general problem, which involves protecting industrial designs by means of a harmonization directive. This has led the Council to believe that this matter could be resolved by leaving the other problem - about the protection of spare parts - to one side.
Hvad angår Kommissionen, tager jeg imod den kritik, som her kom til udtryk hos fru Plooij-van Gorsel og til sidst hos hr. Desama.
As far as the Commission is concerned, I accept the criticism expressed by Mrs Plooijvan Gorsel and finally by Mr Desama.
Jeg vil give den videre til de damer og herrer, som var repræsenteret der.
I shall pass these comments on to those concerned.
Det kan være, at de ikke kæmpede med den største overbevisning, som hr. Desama sagde.
It may be that they did not fight with great conviction, as Mr Desama states.
Det er selvfølgelig helt klart ikke i orden.
That is not acceptable, obviously.
Kommissionen skal altid kæmpe med største overbevisning, netop der, hvor den måske ikke længere ser mange muligheder for at opnå det, som den har sat sig for.
The Commission must always pursue its goals with conviction, possibly even more so when it sees no great hope of achieving its objectives.
Det er en strategisk fejl, hvis man ikke drager i krig med spillende orkester og blafrende flag.
It is a strategic error not to enter the fray with drums beating and flags flying.
Det vil jeg meddele mine kolleger og de herrer, som er repræsenteret der.
I remember when I was a child, if a radio or something got broken, it was sent to be repaired.
Jeg håber, at det ikke sætter spørgsmålstegn ved Deres samtykke. Jeg takker for denne debat.
Today, as we all know, repairing most manufactured items is more expensive than buying them in the first place, and therefore the question of spare parts does not arise.
Jeg husker i min barndom, når et radioapparat eller lignende gik i stykker, sendte man det til reparation.
I shall inform my colleagues and those represented there of this.
Hvis ens ur går i stykker, er det normalt at kassere det og købe et nyt, medmindre der er tale om en antikvitet, og så er vi næsten helt ude af det industrielle område.
I hope that will not jeopardize your support for this proposal. Let me end by thanking you for this debate.
Problemet er opstået i forbindelse med reservedele til biler, rent konkret de ydre dele.
The question has arisen in relation to spare parts for cars, specifically external parts.
Når der sker et alvorligt trafikuheld med dødsofre osv., forsvinder eller smadres bilen normalt, men de fleste biluheld er ikke andet end små sammenstød i byerne, hvor nogen uforsigtigt kører forbi hinanden og ødelægger en dør, en rude eller blot kofangeren.
When there is a serious accident in which people are killed, normally the car is a write-off, but most car accidents happen in our cities, when somebody comes too close alongside and the car gets scraped, resulting in damage to the door or mirror, or perhaps just the bumper.
Dette har betydet opblomstring af en stor industri i mange europæiske lande, nemlig reservedelsindustrien.
Because of this, the spare parts industry is becoming important in many European countries.
Bilfabrikanterne fastholder, at når en reservedelsfabrikant kopierer mønsteret til bil X, som f.eks. kan være
When a spare parts producer copies a design from a specific car, perhaps a luxury model, and puts it on the market, the manufacturer of that car claims that their intellectual property is being violated.
Formanden. - Næste punkt på dagsordenen er indstilling ved andenbehandling (A4-0319/97) af Medina Or tega for Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder om Rådets fælles holdning (C40296/9700/0464(COD)) fastlagt med henblik på vedta
My viewpoint as rapporteur for the first reading was that protection should extend to components, but this was thrown out by the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, whereupon I gave in gracefully and accepted their opinion. The committee proposed an inter mediate solution, whereby spare parts manufacturers
Derfor beder jeg Parlamentet om at støtte de ændringsfor­slag, som er godkendt af Udvalget om Retlige Anliggen­der og Borgernes Rettigheder.
Medina Ortega have already said, and it is important for exports: ensuring that companies can export from one country to another.
Oddy (PSE). ­ (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne lykønske Manuel Medina Ortega med det arbejde, han har lagt i denne betænkning, og også med den meget retfærdige måde, hvorpå han har fået alle de forskellige synspunkter, der er blevet fremført i Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder, til at gå op i en højere enhed.
As Mr Medina Ortega said, the British market will remain open but we are worried about jobs being lost if we cannot export to other countries.
en luksusbil, og markedsfører den, krænkes deres intellek­tuelle ophavsret.
would be allowed to use the designs in question - or at least those parts of them involved in the repair- but would have to pay compensation to the car manufacturer.
Nogen siger derimod nej, mønsterbeskyt­telsen skal gælde hele mønsteret, og hvis en del af mønsteret ødelægges, er denne del ikke beskyttet.
This solution was a compromise between the two positions and established a system based on compulsory licences.
Dette er en meget vigtig betænkning.
Then there is the consumer issue.
Der er mange arbejdspladser på spil, alene i Coventry og West Midlands drejer det sig om ca. 70.000 jobs i komponent­ og motorproduktionsindustrien.
Consumers are entitled to have speedy repairs done at sensible prices with maximum choice, and the repair clause allows this.
Så vi taler om noget af sam­fundsøkonomisk betydning i dette direktiv.
There are some concerns about the health and safety issues of spare parts, but this is better dealt with in other legislation.
Som en god spiller accepterede jeg nederlaget og overtog Retsudvalgets synspunkt.
We believe that from Parliament's point of view this is the worst possible solution.
Dermed kunne der opnås en kompro­misløsning mellem parterne. Dette forslag indførte et system, som vi kunne kalde et obligatorisk licenssystem.
There is nothing worse for the internal market than leaving things undecided.
Kommissionen syntes tilsyneladende godt om det og besluttede at støtte det.
This stability can only be achieved by finding a solution -either good or bad.
Rådet sagde nej og nåede til en salomonisk løsning, der bestod i at sige »vi løser ikke problemet«.
The worst solution is no solution at all.
Jeg er meget ærgerlig ­ og jeg deler Manuel Medinas ærgrelse ­ over, at det behagede Rådet at afvise den meget retfærdige løsning, som Parlamentet havde udarbejdet ved sin førstebehandling.
Therefore, Parliament has reintroduced most of the first reading amendments, making use of the Commission's improvements to the text. There are a few other, less important, amendments.
Det var vanskeligt at få alle til at blive mere eller mindre enige, og vi anerkender, at dette var den bedste løsning, vi kunne finde ­ den er ikke helt perfekt, men den fik størst mulig tilslutning her i Parla­mentet.
For example, there is a clause relating to visible and invisible motorcycle components. But on the whole, the situation is that the Council has rejected Parliament's proposals and wants to shelve the matter, whereas Parliament is proposing a solution.
Så forkastede Rådet den og valgte i stedet en free for α/7­klausul uden nogen form for harmonisering i relation til reparationsklausulen.
Casini C. (PPE). - (IT) Madam President, I only wish to examine the point that has been the subject of particular discussion within the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights.
Rådet har ikke opfyldt den pligt, det har til at finde en hensigtsmæssig europæisk løsning, og jeg håber virkelig, at Rådet lytter til Parlamen­tet og udskifter reparationsklausulen.
The delicacy of the case in question stems from the fact that the object of the measure submitted for our consideration is openly that of creating harmonization between the different legislations to ensure freer competition and greater ease of circulation.