natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Spørgsmål nr. 44 (Hautala): Projektet om færdiggørelse af atomreaktorerne Khmelnitski 2 og Rovno 4 (k2/r4) i Ukraine
Question 44 (Hautala): Proposed project for the completion of Khmelnitski 2 and Rovno 4 nuclear reactors (k2/r4) in the Ukraine
Støtte til skibsbygningsindustrien Sindal, Jarzembowski, Riis­Jørgensen, Querbes, Sjöstedt, Van Miert (Kommissionen).
Aid to shipbuilding ■ Sindal, Jarzembowski, Riis­Jørgensen, Querbes, Sjöstedt, van Miert (Commission) . .
Forsyningspligtsydelser i Europa
Services of general interest in Europe
Bilag: Spørgetidsbilag
Annex: Question Time (Commission). . . :
Vil Kommissionen venligst undersøge, om det er tilfældet?
(The sitting was opened at 9: 00 am) .
Formanden. ­ Protokollen for mødet i går er omdelt.
Lindqvist (ELDR). ­ (SV) I did not see my name in yesterday's Minutes from yesterday, but I was here.
Er der nogen bemærkninger?
President. ­ The Minutes of yesterday's sitting have been distributed.
Formanden. ­ Hr. Thomas, vi er i færd med at godkende protokollen.
Very well, Mr Lindqvist, we shall do just
Vi vil ikke genåbne debatten fra i går.
President that.
Lad det bare være helt klart.
Are there any comments?
Thomas (PSE). ­ (EN) Fru formand, det drejer sig om nogle bemærkninger, som blev fremsat af min kollega hr. Hallam i går.
Thomas (PSE). ­ Madam President, I rise concerning comments made by my colleague Mr Hallam yesterday.
Jeg tror, at han fik formuleret sig forkert og i virkeligheden ønskede at stille følgende spørgsmål: I lyset af nylige forlydender i pressen vil Parlamentet da
I think he missed the point and the question he meant to ask was: In the light of recent reports in the press, can Parliament write to the Commission and ask if there is any truth in the fact that American companies are lobbying it heavily to relax legislation with regard to genetically modified organisms and genetically engineered food? Could we find out from the Commission if this is the case?
Lindqvist (ELDR). ­ (SV) Jeg har ikke set mit navn i protokollen fra i går, ­men jeg var her.
President. ­ Mr Thomas, we are on approval of the Minutes. We are not going to return to yesterday's debate.
Jeg vil altså gerne tilføje til protokollen, at jeg var til stede her i går, men at jeg ikke er med i gårsdagens protokol.
What happens to our resolutions, and how could the Council presidency say it had no idea although the resolution was
Jeg er ikke sikker på, at De har fået den rigtige opfattelse af dette, for endnu en gang har der været mange ting i omløb.
I shall give the floor to Mr Hänsch, as this is a matter of personal concern.
Der er blevet sagt ting, der ikke er korrekte.
I think that is the least I can do.
Jeg står personlig inde for den trufne beslutning. (Bifald)
Rosado Fernandes (UPE). - (FR) Madam President, I will speak to you in French, to make it easy for you, as you spoke on this question.
Pack (PPE). - (DE) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne tro Dem, og jeg tror Dem også.
Hänsch (PSE). - (DE) Madam President, thank you first of all for what you have said by way of an explanation.
Derfor vil jeg gerne have at vide af Dem, hvilken af hr. Hänsch' forgængere der har indgivet den samme anmodning om det samme privilegium.
On 22 October I wrote a letter pursuant to Rule 28, paragraph 2, asking the Presidency of the Bureau why a car had been made available to the past President, Mr Hänsch, and why he continued to enjoy the same privileges as when he was President.
(Bifald)
(Noise)
Jeg har nu siden september forhørt mig på ny hver måned om, hvorledes noget sådant overhovedet kan forekomme.
I have only asked for a reply regarding existing precedents and the cost of these things.
Hvad bliver der af vores beslutninger, og hvorfor kan rådsformandskabet sige, det ingen anelse har derom, selvom det jo forelå.
Also, we are currently living in a concentration camp atmosphere, where people wish to control our least movements.
Og nu vil jeg gerne anmode om omsider at få et svar, for at jeg ikke som en anden bedemølle skal begynde forfra i hver mødeperiode!
I would not want the Bureau to become a politburo which would be unaccountable to this House.
Formanden. - Jeg forstår ikke hvorfor der er tale om hr. Hänsch?
For occasions such as these I had an official car placed at my disposal.
Hr. Barón Crespo, hr. Plumb og hr. Dankert er også tidligere formænd for Parlamentet.
Every one of you who has ever seen me here in Strasbourg and in Brussels knows that I do not have an official car available, rather I queue along with those waiting for a normal car in the evening, as any other honourable Member would do.
Formanden. - Vi tager Deres erklæring og Deres ønske til efterretning.
That as an MEP I have a car at my disposal is not true, and anyone maintaining that is lying!
Er der flere bemærkninger?
There we have it, Madam President.
Rosado Fernandes (UPE). - (FR) Fru formand, jeg vil tale på fransk, så det er lettere for Dem, eftersom De jo tog ordet til dette spørgsmål.
President - Mr Fernandes, I understood the question you put to me in my own language. I would also have been able to understand it if it had been put in your own language.
Den 22. oktober skrev jeg et brev med udgangspunkt i forretningsordenens artikel 28, stk. 2, hvori jeg spurgte Præsidiet, hvad grunden var til, at den tidligere formand, hr. Hänsch, har en bil stillet til sin rådighed og fortsat nyder samme privilegier, som da han var formand.
Having said that, the Bureau has indeed looked at the way in which we might, with a maximum of dignity, deal with our past Presidents, those of them, of course, who continue to be serving Members of this House.
Hänsch (PSE). - (DE) Fru formand, for det første siger jeg Dem tak for den forklaring, De her har givet.
Pack (PPE). - (DE) Madam President, I was not com menting on Mr Hänsch's case.
Det eneste jeg bad om var at få at vide, hvilke fortilfælde der fandtes, og hvad disse ting koster.Dertil kommer, at vi for tiden lever under koncentrationslejragtige forhold, hvor man vil kontrollere vores mindste bevægelse.
I made a clear-cut enquiry, and you failed to understand it. I asked you to tell me which of Mr Hänsch's predecessors made the same suggestion to the Bureau, of having an official car placed at their disposal for several months or years, no more and no less!
Jeg ser nødigt, at Præsidiet forvandler sig til et politbureau som ikke aflægger regnskab over for Parlamentet.
I asked whether it was Mr Barón Crespo, or whether it was Lord Plumb, or whoever.
Det var det hele, fru formand.
I did not enquire at all about Mr Hänsch.
Jeg vil gerne have et svar!
I would like an answer on this.
Til sådanne lejligheder har jeg fået stillet en tjenestevogn til rådighed.
You can well imagine that, after two and a half years as President, these colleagues are very much in demand, are invited to make many visits, and to respond to many requests.
Alle blandt Dem, der nogensinde har set mig her i Strasbourg eller i Bruxelles, ved, at jeg på mødestederne ikke har nogen tjenestevogn til rådighed, men at jeg stiller op i køen af dem, der om aftenen venter på den normale vogn, som alle andre kolleger.
We have adopted an approach which is very measured, perfectly reasonable, which I would ask you to look at with considerable care.
Formanden. - Hr. Fernandes, jeg forstod udmærket Deres spørgsmål på mit sprog.
President. - Mrs Pack, I did understand that you were talking about Mr Hänsch, but I am not even aware if the request originated from Mr Hänsch himself.
Jeg ville også have været i stand til at forstå det på Deres.
The Bureau considered a proposal from the Secretary General, without us knowing whether...
Når det er sagt, så har Præsidiet faktisk set nærmere på, hvordan vi kunne behandle de af os, som har været formænd, og som selvsagt stadig er aktive medlemmer af Parlamentet, med et maksimum af værdighed.
That is why the Bureau has adopted these procedures, which affect a number of our colleagues, and which of course have no reason to continue once those colleagues have left Parliament. But I can assure you there is nothing excessive.
Pack (PPE). - (DE) Fru formand, jeg udtalte mig slet ikke om tilfældet Hänsch.
I am not sure that you are aware of the precise details of these questions, because here too, many stories have done the rounds.
Jeg stillede et præcist supplerende spørgsmål, som De ikke opfattede.
It is just like that well-known story about the media, the television and the photographers.
Om det var hr. Barón Crespo eller hr. Plumb eller en helt anden, dét var, hvad jeg spurgte om.
That is quite simply what I wanted to say.
Jeg spurgte overhovedet ikke om noget vedrørende hr. Hänsch.
The Bureau of 5 November 1997 adopted the following points.
Det er grunden til, at Præsidiet har vedtaget disse ordninger, som berører et vist antal af vores kolleger, og som i sagens natur ikke længere er virksomme, når disse kolleger forlader Parlamentet.
These were the limitations set on the Bureau's decision. I think it is important to be specific about this, as I am tempted into believing that many colleagues, and this is quite normal, had no exact knowledge of these matters.
Men jeg forsikrer Dem for, at der ikke er tale om nogen form for overdrivelse.
It was proposed by the Secretary General of the European Parliament as applicable to all past presidents,
Jeg kræver et svar på hvem, der afgør om mine spørgsmål må stilles eller ikke.
President answer as to who decides whether my questions may be asked or not.
Det blev forelagt os af generalsekretæren for Europa-Parlamentet med adresse til samtlige tidligere formænd, og formanden for Europa-Parlamentet var sågar så taktfuld at sige, at han ville foretrække, at det var fru Fontaine, der sad i formandsstolen unden denne del af Præsidiets møde, eftersom det jo også ville berøre ham, når han ikke mere var formand.
and the President of the European Parliament was considerate enough to say he would prefer Mrs Fontaine to take the chair for that part of the Bureau meeting, as it would affect him as well, once he was no longer President This request was not put forward by any particular person.
Anmodningen kom ikke fra denne eller hin person, den blev fremsat helt uafhængigt og vedtaget med de nævnte afgrænsninger.
It was put forward in its own right, and it was adopted subject to those restrictions.
Vi havde ikke nogen længere debat om dette spørgsmål, men jeg vurderede, at mine kolleger måtte være fuldt ud informeret om den kontekst dette fandt sted i.
We did not get into a debate on the subject, but in my view, my colleagues should be fully informed of the context in which this decision was taken.
I virkeligheden var Deres spørgsmål henvendt til Rådet og til Kommissionen, og de skulle have været stillet med udgangspunkt i artikel 28, men der er intet til hinder for, at De stiller dem igen i overensstemmelse med den pågældende artikel i forretningsordenen, og så vil De naturligvis modtage et svar.
In reality, your questions are directed to the Council and to the Commission, and they should have been raised pursuant to Rule 28, but it is perfectly possible for you to restate those questions under the appropriate Rule, and at that point, quite clearly, you will receive a reply.
De Vries (ELDR). - (NL) Fru formand, den beslutning, som Præsidiet har truffet, vil gælde for fremtiden.
De Vries (ELDR). - (NL) Madam President, the decision taken by the Bureau will apply in the future.
Det vil sige, at hver formand for Parlamentet således for fremtiden kan råde over denne facilitet i tre måneder efter afslutningen af sit mandat.
This means that, in future, every President of this House will be able to make use of this facility for a period of three months after the end of his mandate.
Det forekommer mig at være rimeligt, det forekommer mig også at være i hele Parlamentets interesse.
That seems reasonable to me; it also seems to me in the interest of this entire House.
Og lad mig lige tilføje, at hr. Hänsch efter min overbevisning har været en af de bedste for mænd, som Parlamentet nogen sinde har haft, og at jeg er stolt over, at han stadig tre måneder efter afslutningen af sit mandat kan fungere på en sådan måde.
And may I add, Madam President, that it is my firm belief that Mr Hänsch was one of the best Presidents this Parliament ever had, and that I am proud that, three months after his mandate has come to end, he will still be able to function in such a way.
Falconer (PSE). - (EN) Fru formand, jeg spurgte også formanden om prisen på computersystemerne i Bruxelles.
Falconer (PSE). - Madam President, I too asked the President about the cost of the computer system in Brussels.
Jeg går ud fra, at jeg ikke får et svar, derhen at jeg ikke kan få et svar i henhold til artikel 41, stk. 1 i forretnings ordenen, som hr. Lindqvist har henvist til.
I trust that I will not receive a reply to the effect that I cannot receive a reply on the basis of Rule 41.1 which Mr Lindqvist has referred to.
Når medlem merne stiller et spørgsmål til formanden, har de ret til et svar, og man bør ikke henvise til artikler i forretningsordenen for at undgå at svare.
When Members put a question to the President, they are entitled to an answer and Rules should not be used to obviate that answer.
Vi må have et svar på, hvorfor vi har et computersystem i Bruxelles, der ikke kan håndtere cd-rommer, og for hvilket hovedkontrahenten har en treårig garanti, der forhindrer os i at anvende computerne til brugervenlige formål.
We must have an answer as to why we have a computer system in Brussels which cannot take CD-roms and on which the main contractor has a three-year warranty, which prevents us using the computers for user-friendly purposes.
Disse spørgsmål skal be svares.
Answers to these questions must be given.
Vælgerne kræver det.
Our constituents demand it.
Formanden. - Hr. Falconer, det ser ud til, at hvis De stiller Deres spørgsmål på ny med henvisning til artikel 28, så vil De få et svar.
President. - Mr Falconer, it appears that your question has been restated in accordance with Rule 28, and you will be receiving a reply.
Rosado Fernandes (UPE). - (PT) Fru formand, jeg vender ikke tilbage til den sag, som jeg har rejst her.
Rosado Fernandes (UPE). - (PT) Madam President, I will not go back to the matter I raised here.
Hvis kvæstorerne aflægger vidnesbyrd i denne forsamling, vil vi få at vide/hvordan tingene i virkeligheden er gået for. sig, vil vi få sandheden frem.
If the Quaestors give evidence in this House we shall know what really happened. We shall know the truth.
Samland (PSE). - (DE) Fru formand, for det første: protokollen fra Præsidiets møder tilgår hvert enkelt med lem.
Samland (PSE). - (DE) Madam President, first of all, the Presidency Minutes are sent to every Member.
Derfor har alle medlemmer, som har øjne og ører, deri kunnet læse, hvad Præsidiet har vedtaget i dette spørgsmål.
That is why every Member with eyes and ears has been able to read what the Presidency resolved in this matter.
Der er således ikke tale om noget overraskende.
There is, therefore, nothing surprising about what we are dealing with here.
For det andet: der er tale om en generel vedtagelse, som vedrører alle formænd for Europa-Parlamentet.
Secondly, this is a general resolution affecting all Presidents of this House.
For det tredje - for nu, fru Pack, at komme lidt ind på mærkværdighederne - det, der gøres her, er noget, der tilkommer formændene for samtlige 15 nationale parlamenter.
Thirdly, as regards unusual, Mrs Pack, what is being practised here is no different from what all presidents or speakers of the 15 national parliaments are entitled to.
For det fjerde: Europa-Parlamentet skal ikke gøre sig ringere, end det er.
Fourthly, this Parliament should not diminish itself.
Det bør være stolt af, at Europa-Parlamentets formænd holder taler i andre medlemsstater og kan stå frem dér og af, at de repræsenterer Europa-Parlamentets interesser og ikke en politisk gruppes.
It should be proud that Presidents of this Parliament can appear and deliver speeches in other Member States, that they represent the interests of this House and not the interests of a political group.
Derfor finder jeg for det femte den måde beskæmmende, hvorpå der her føres en debat om en formand, der har repræsenteret Europa-Parlamentet på en måde, som ikke mange andre formænd har gjort!
That is why, fifthly, I find it shameful that a debate is being conducted here about the President who has represented this House in a way that not many other Presidents have managed to do!
Jeg vil blot anføre, at jeg den 20. oktober stillede Kom missionen et skriftligt spørgsmål, der krævede et hurtigt svar.
I would just like to mention that I submitted an urgent written question to the Commission on 20 October.
Jeg satte her spørgsmålstegn ved den katastrofale landbrugspolitik, der med strukturfondene er blevet ført i mit land.
That question raised the matter of the disastrous agricultural policy to which the structural funds were applied in my country.
Jeg ved, at det endnu ikke er kommet, og generalsekretæren oplyste mig allerede den 19. november om, at det burde være her.
I know it has still not arrived, and the Secretary General of this Parliament told me it should have been here by 19 November.
Jeg har altid påpeget den »omertà«, der gør sig gældende mellem Kommissionen og
I have always spoken against the conspiracy of silence between the Commission and member countries.
De dækker hinanden.
They cover up for each other.
Derfor har jeg ikke fået svar.
That is why I have not had a reply.
Det er et svar, som jeg har ret til, og som de portugisiske borgere har ret til.
I am entitled to that reply and so are the people of Portugal.
Spørgsmålet har nr. 3479/ 97 og blev stillet den 20. oktober.
The number of the question is 3479/97 and it was submitted on 20 October.
Jeg ved, at kommissær Deus Pinheiro - det vil sige kasernens stemme - har søgt at forhindre, at svaret bliver givet.
I know Commissioner Deus Pinheiro - that is, the voice of the authorities - has tried to prevent the reply from being sent out.
Hvis dette er en tilladelig fremgangsmåde i et demokrati, så foretrækker jeg, fru formand, at leve i en totalitær stat.
If that is an acceptable procedure in a democracy, Madam President, then I would rather live in a totalitarian state.
Jeg har levet i et diktatur, og det anvendte ganske givet ikke den slags fremgangsmåder, som mange gange anvendes her.
I have already lived under a dictatorship, and it certainly did not use procedures like the ones that are often used here.
Formanden. - Hr. Rosado Fernandes, jeg hørte ikke det sidste af Deres indlæg.
President. - Mr Rosado Fernandes, I did not hear the end of your speech.
Jeg vil holde mig til den første del og sige, at vi skal se efter og sørge for, at De modtager et svar på det spørgsmål, De har stillet.
I shall confine myself to the first part, and say that we will check and ensure that you receive a reply to the question you have raised.
Jeg vil gerne endnu en gang gentage disse prioriteringer, som vi vedtog i marts.
I now have a question for you as President.
Det var bekæmpelsen af arbejdsløsheden, udnyttelse af de små og mellemstore samt de allermindste virksomheders potentiale, forberedelsen af den proces, der skal munde ud i en udvidelse med de central- og østeuropæiske stater, samt fremme af ungdoms-, uddannelses- og kulturprogrammer.
Since my questions were sent to the President of the Parliament, I would like to know who it is who decides whether questions may be asked in Parliament or not.
I forbindelse med spørgsmålet om at indlede forberedelsesprocessen har vi for Kommissionens vedkommende vedtaget en reserve på 20 A-stillinger for i politisk henseende at gøre opmærksom på, at tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne skal indledes i 1998.
Is it yourself, some presiding committee or Parliament's members who decide? I do not see my questions here on the question form, neither the question to the Commission, nor the one to the Council.
Denne reserve kan - det vil jeg gerne foreslå Europa-Parlamentet - principielt ikke opretholdes længere, da Rådet sidste weekend entydigt pålagde Kommissionen at tage fat på at forberede tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne.
I consider questions about the building work in Brussels and Strasbourg to be questions which greatly concern us and our voters who ask questions.
Jeg mener, at vores med denne reserve forbundne politiske hensigt dermed er opfyldt.
It must be possible to ask this kind of question. I demand an
Medina Ortega (PSE). - (ES) Fru formand, jeg synes Rosados sidste udtalelse krænker demokratiet.
Medina Ortega (PSE). - (ES) Madam President, it seems to me that Mr Rosado's final statement was an insult to democracies.
Jeg har selv været så uheldig at leve under et diktatur, og diktaturets fremgangsmåder er meget forskellige fra Parlamentets.
I have had the misfortune to live under a dictatorship, and the procedures used in a dictator state are very different from those which this Parliament has adopted.
Jeg anmoder Rosado Fernandes om at trække sine ord tilbage i respekt for de demokratiske institutioner og for dette Parlament.
I would ask Mr Rosado Fernandes to rephrase his statement, in order to show support for democratic institutions and this Parliament.
Formanden. - Der er derfor, hr. Medina Ortega, at jeg foretrak ikke at høre den. (')
President - Mr Medina Ortega, that was the reason I preferred not to have heard. (')
Der var én ting, som var starten ikke var genstand for drøftelse, og det er en gentagelse af det, vi sidste år oplevede fra Rådets side, nemlig nedskæringen af udbetalingerne via strukturfondene. Dét har vi fra start til slut sagt nej til.
We are now in a position, courtesy of the latest data, to adapt the Commission's preliminary draft for agricultural spending to the real conditions found in the year and so not only create a sensible budgetary policy, but also allow the Member States to make savings.
Vi har i den henseende holdt os til aftalen. Jeg vil gerne udtrykkelig fremhæve det gode resultat, vi opnåede på landbrugsområdet under budgetproceduren for 1998.
The allocations for those involved, to wit the farmers, still remain unaffected by this; only the overly high estimates in the agricultural budget we normally have every year have been reduced to a minimum with the 1998 budget.
Vi er nu på grundlag af de nyeste data i stand til at tilpasse Kommissionens foreløbige forslag til landbrugsudgifterne til de faktiske forhold i det pågældende år og således ikke kun føre fornuftig budget politik, men tillige muliggøre besparelser i selve medlems staterne.
(A4-0390/97) by Mr Tillich and Mr Tomlinson, on behalf of the Committee on Budgets, on the draft general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 1998, as modified by the Council (Sections I to VI) (C4-0600/97) and on amending letter 1/98 to the 1998 preliminary draft budget, Section III - Commission (C4-0645/97)
A4-0409/97 af Giansily for Budgetudvalget om for slag til ESKF's aktionsbudget for 1998 (SEK(97)0933 - C40270/97).
(A4-0409/97) by Mr Giansily, on behalf of the Com mittee on Budgets, on the draft ECSC operating budget for 1998 (SEC(97)0933 - C4-0270/97)
Sagt i forbifarten har vi også haft andre gode resultater på landbrugsområdet.
Incidentally, we have had other successes in the area of agriculture.
Vi har for første gang fået ret til medindflydelse på landbrugsområdet sammen med Rådet, Rådet tog under andenbehandlingen hensyn til landbrugs udvalgets ændringsforslag.
For the first time we have achieved the right to be consulted along with the Council in this area, with amendments from the Committee on Agriculture being taken into account at the Council's second reading.
Det er en forhandlingssucces.
This is a success of our negotiations.
Vi har opnået et nyt nomenklatur i en vis del af landbrugs udgifterne.
We achieved a new nomenclature in a certain area of agricultural spending.
Vi har endvidere en reserve på ECU 200 millioner, hvor vi ikke kun kan få, men skal have medindflydelse.
We also have a reserve of ECU 200 million, where we are not only able to have a say, but are required to have a say.
Det foreskriver procedurerne.
The procedure provides for this.
Dermed har vi igen ret til medindflydelse, hvad angår de obligatoriske udgifter.
It means we also have the right to be consulted in the area of obligatory expenditure.