natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Følgelig skal Fællesskabet oprette en forbindelsesenhed, der lige som de nationale forbindelsesofficerer har adgang til Euro pols informationssystem og også kan tilføre Europol relevant viden.
Uaison officer should thus be appointed, who would have access to Europol's information system in the same way as national liaison officers and, on the other hand, pass on any relevant findings to Europol.
Ordføreren, hr. Nassauer, kunne ikke medtage vore over vejelser.
The rapporteur, Mr Nassauer, has not been able to incorporate our ideas.
Og vi har bevidst heller ikke fremsat noget ændringsforslag herom, da vi på nuværende tidspunkt ville undgå at belaste den i forvejen møjsommelige procedure om iværksættelsen af Europol.
We have deüberately not tabled an amendment on these Unes, however, so as not to impose a further strain at this stage on the already laborious procedure for bringing Europol into effect.
Meget tungere vejer i øjeblikket problemet med forsinkelsen på grand af EF-Domstolens manglende kompetence.
A much greater concern at present is the problem of delay because of the lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice.
I lyset af de mulig heder, som Europol trods al berettiget kritik byder til en effektiv bekæmpelse af kriminalitet, ville en sådan forsinkelse vel ikke kunne forsvares politisk.
In view of the scope which Europol offers for combating crime effectively, despite all the justified criticism, such a delay would surely not be poUtically responsible.
Konventionen er kommet i stand uden delagtiggørelse af de nationale parlamenter.
The Convention has come about without national parliaments being involved.
Intet nationalt parlament blev ind draget i formuleringen af konventioneris tekst.
No national parUament has played a part in the drafting of the text.
Europa-Parlamentet blev holdt udenfor, helt i modstrid med artikel K.6 i traktaten.
The European Parliament has been excluded, with disregard for Article K.6 of the Treaty.
Og samtidig skal Europol allerede have omfattende beføjelser for også at kunne gribe ind i Den Europæiske Unions borgeres frihedsrettigheder, men uden at en instans som EF-Domstolen har kompetence.
But at the same time, Europol is already to be given comprehensive powers to intervene in the basic rights and freedoms of the citizens of the European Union, without a body such as the European Court of Justice having any jurisdiction.
Jeg siger det endnu en gang lidt forenklet, også til vore tilhørere: ingen parlamentariker har hidtil været inddraget, det er heller ikke meningen at inddrage Europa-Parlamentet; heller ingen dommer skal kunne kontrollere, om Europols aktiviteter er lovlige, men politienheden skal have betyde lige beføjelser.
I would repeat in rather simpler terms, for the benefit of those who are listening: no Member of Parliament has yet been involved, nor is it intended to involve the European Parliament, and no judge will be able to examine whether the actions of Europol are legitimate, even though it is to be given considerable powers.
Det går ikke!
That will not do!
Jeg vover den påstand, at mistilliden til Den Europæiske Union hos borgerne i Unionen er så dyb, fordi Rådet mener, at det med sin arrogante holdning kan tilvejebringe fait accomplier og oprette en politienhed uden at delagtiggøre Europas folkevalgte repræsentanter.
I would venture to say that the reason why the mistrust of the European Union among our citizens is so profound is because the Council believes, in its arrogant way, that it can create a fait accompli and set up a police body without involving the elected representatives of the citizens of Europe.
Det.er ulovligt, det er imod de tanker om retsstaten, som denne Union burde være baseret på.
That is wrong, and goes against the idea of a state under the rule of law on which this Union should be based.
Vort politiske budskab skal derfor være: Fortsæt med at udøve pres, således at spørgsmålet om EF-Domstolens kompetence bliver ordriet, men begynd alligevel med at ratificere nu og stol på, at Europol vil være en succes i bekæmpelsen af international kriminalitet.
Our political message should therefore be: continue to press for the question of the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice to be settled, but nevertheless make a start with ratification and trust that Europol wül be successful in combating international crime.
Muligheden herfor er stor.
The opportunity for doing so is great.
Med en sådan succes vil mange forbehold bestemt også forsvinde.
And with success, many of the reservations will disappear.
Så skal en udvidelse af Europols beføjelser nok komme automatisk, også når det gælder beskyttelse af Unionens økonomiske interesser.
That would pave the way for extending Eu ropol's responsibilities, not least to cover protection of the Union's financial interests.
Vi vil i dag stemme om en række ændringsforslag, hvor der har været meningsforskelle.
We shall be voting controversially today on a series of amendments.
I det væsentlige drejer det sig her om spørgsmålene databeskyttelse på højt niveau, hr. Nassauer, og om EF-Domstolens kompetence i præjudicielle spørgsmål.
The main points here, Mr Nassauer, are a high degree of data protection and the power of the Court of Justice to issue preliminary rulings.
Grunden til, at disse to centrale spørgsmål, som forhandlingen om Europol til slut er reduceret til, er af så stor betydning, er, at vi jo tydeligt kan se, at Rådet har overdraget en enhed, der i øjeblikket jo kun arbejder foreløbigt, stadig flere opgaver.
The reason why these two key issues, to which the debate on Europol has finally come down, are so important is that we need to realize that the Council has given more and more tasks to a unit which at the moment is still only working on a provisional basis.
På topmødet i Essen fik Europol også overdraget kompetence i forbindelse med ulovtig handel med nukleare materialer, hvor et medlems lands regering i Den Europæiske Union var eller stadig er kraftigt involveret i overhovedet at skabe markedet for denne.
At the Essen summit, Europol was given the further responsibility of dealing with the illegal trade in nuclear materials, when one Member State of the Union clearly was or still is heavily involved in creating the market for these in the first place.
Det står hævet over enhver tvivl!
There is no doubt whatsoever about that.
Men tilblivelsen af den konvention, som hr. Nassauer har udarbejdet en betænkning om, skal ses i et historisk perspektiv.
However, we cannot look at the establishment of the Convention, on which Mr Nassauer has produced his report, without considering what has happened beforehand.
Det er utilstedeligt, at Rådet stiller ovennævnte stærkt forenklede krav i Den Europæiske Union.
It wiU not do in the European Union for the Council of Ministers to issue striking calls of the kind which I have just repeated here.
Naturlig vis har vi brug for en kvalificeret bekæmpelse af organiseret kriminalitet i vort område, i Unionen.
Of course we need a professional means of combating organized crime on our territory and in our Union.
Men denne politienhed, som skal sikre dette, båret af borgernes tillid, kan ikke udføre dette arbejde, hvis den er ulovlig allerede i sin tilblivelse!
But the police office which is meant to do this, with the confidence of our citizens, will not be able to perform its task if it is set up wrongly to begin with!
Europol skal overtage stadig flere opgaver, på usikret retsgrundlag, og Europa-Parlamentet får i dag at vide, at hvis vi i dag ikke med bredt flertal stemmer for Nassauerbetænkningen, så er det os, der sinker udviklingen af Europol.
Europol is to take on more and more tasks, with an uncertain legal basis, and today the European Parliament is being told: if you do not broadly approve the report by Mr Nassauer, you will be the ones who are holding up the development of Europol.
Det passer ikke!
That is wrong!
Vi vil ikke sinke udviklingen, vi vil fremme den.
We do not wish to hold things up, we wish to take them forward.
Denne politienhed skal snart i arbejde, men vi vil sørge for - og det vil vi som socialdemokrater i dag kæmpe for -, at den skal i arbejde på et retsstatligt grundlag med en kontrol, der sikrer borgemes beskyttelsesværdige interesser.
This police office should begin work soon, but we wish to make sure -and we shall be fighting for this today as social democrats - that it operates on the basis of the rule of law, with controls, and in the interests of the citizens of Europe that deserve protection.
Denne Europol-konvention er ikke blevet til, sådan som den skulle være blevet til.
This Europol Convention has not been established as it should have been.
Parlamentet præsenteres for et fait accompli.
Parliament has been confronted with a fait accompli.
Det kan man se alene ved, at denne konvention, som der i dag forhandles om i form af en betænkning, og som vi skal stemme om, allerede er ved at blive ratificeret.
This can be seen from the fact that the Convention, a report on which we are discussing today and will be voting on, is aheady in the process of ratification.
Lidt frejdigt sagt vil det sige, at Rådet efter at have tilvejebragt et fait accompli måske allernådigst vil tage det, vi i dag her vedtager, til efterretning.
To put it rather loosely: the Council may possibly be good enough to take note of what we decide here today, after creating a fait accompli.
Det har ikke noget med demokrati at gøre!
That is not democracy!
En sådan konvention vil det ikke gå godt, en sådan konvention kan ikke bære frugt.
A Convention of this kind will not work weU and wül not bring results.
Reding (PPE). - (FR) Hr. formand, må det først være mig tilladt på mine egne og på min gruppes vegne at lykønske ordføreren med hans engagerede og effektive arbejde.
Reding (PPE). - (FR) Mr President, first of all, on my own behalf and on behalf of my group, I would like to congratulate the rapporteur on his diligent and successful efforts.
Han har udført et virkelig prisværdigt stykke arbejde for bor gernes sikkerhed.
He has done an excellent job in the interests of safeguarding the pubUc.
Hr. Nassauer, det må vi, der nu har diskuteret og forhandlet med ham i over et år, lade ham, har i sin betænkning optaget en række af de ønsker, som vi har fremlagt for ham.
As those of us know who have been discussing the issue and negotiating with him for more than a year now, Mr Nassauer has included in his report many of the requests which we have made to him.
Jeg var forbavset, hr. Nassauer, over at høre Dem sige, at konventionen er baseret på et højt databeskyttelsesniveau.
But I was amazed to hear you say, Mr Nassauer, that in your view, the Convention provides a high degree of data protection.
Det er den ikke.
That is not the case.
Men det er forbavsende, at en i menne
They may not be adequate, but they are strong enough all the same for us to be grateful to you.
Det har taget medlemsstaterne tre år at udarbejde konventionen om Europol, og nu, hvor man skulle til at gå videre til næste trin, blokerer én medlemsstat, Storbritannien, hele processen.
It has taken the Member States three years to conclude the Europol Convention, and now that we should be moving on to the next stage - ratification - one Member State, the United Kingdom, is obstructing the process.
Hvorfor? Fordi Storbritannien afviser, at EF-
Why?
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
'Debates of the European Parliament
Reding økonomi ved brug af meget mere sofistikerede midler end vore arme og tåbelige indre grænser.
Reding information must be energetically defended and also be cause in our opinion the lack of agreement on the powers to be conferred on the Court of Justice and the fact that Parliament has no part to play may occasion serious damage to the State governed by the rule of law.
Domstolen er kompetent vedrørende Europol, og dermed afholder et enkelt land alle Unionens borgere fra at få garantier for sikringen af deres rettigheder, fordi de nationale jurisdiktioner risikerer at være lidet effektive i over nationale anliggender.
The fact that the definition of Europol's powers is envisaged only for June 1996 and that the Europol Convention cannot come into force without legislation regarding the Court of Justice are two factors which we view as particularly dangerous.
Hvordan skal borgerne kunne forstå denne situation?
How do you expect Europe's citizens to understand this situation?
Ud viklingen af Europol, kimen til det europæiske politi, er en nødvendighed for alles sikkerhed.
The development of Europol, the embryo of the European police force, is essential for the security of us aU.
Så siger borgerne til os, at eftersom kun solidaritet blandt alle Unionens medlems stater kan garantere den sikkerhed, vi ønsker, må I aktivere jer, giv os nu endelig mulighed for at bekæmpe narkotika, terrorisme og organiseret kriminalitet.
Well then, say the public, since the only way of guaranteeing the security which we all want is by means of a joint action by all the States of the Union, get moving, give us the resources to fight effectively against drugs, against terrorism, against organized crime.
Nu stiller følgende spørgsmål sig: skal vi for at omgå den britiske blokade og aktivere Europol hurtigst muligt ratificere denne konvention, uden at EF-Domstolen får beføjelser til at træffe præjudicielle afgørelser?
And the question which arises then is this: In order to chcumvent the British blockade and launch Europol as soon as possible, are we going to have to ratify this convention without giving the European Court of Justice jurisdiction for preliminary decisions?
Eller skal vi tværtimod vente på, at Domstolen bliver kompetent i anliggender vedrørende Europol?
Or, alternatively, are we going to have to wait for the Court to acquire jurisdiction in matters relating to Europol?
Wiebenga (ELDR). - (NL) Hr. formand, Europol i Haag har i godt og vel to år fungeret uden behørigt retsgrundlag.
Wiebenga (ELDR). - (NL) Mr President, Europol has been operating in The Hague for the past two years without a proper legal basis.
Det har varet op til halvandet år efter påbegyndelsen af aktiviteterne, før ministrene og regeringerne havde vedtaget teksten til Europol-konventionen, og denne tekst mangler at blive ratificeret af femten nationale parlamenter.
It took one and a half years from the start of its operations for the text of a Europol Convention to be agreed by the ministers and governments, and that text is yet to be ratified by fifteen national parliaments.
Hvor længe kommer det til at vare endnu?
How much longer is it going to take?
I politik går idealisme og realisme desværre sjældent hånd i hånd.
In politics, sadly, idealism and realism are often uneasy bedfellows.
Hvis vi ønsker at opnå det ideelle, risikerer vi at forsinke iværksættelsen af Europol i mange og lange år, og vi risikerer dermed at forvolde alvorlig skade på borgernes sikkerhed.
If we aim for the ideal result, we risk delaying the launch of Europol for many years, and as a result we risk doing serious damage to public security.
Jeg går derfor ind for en hurtig gennemførelse af ratificeringsprocedurerne og sideløbende hermed intense forhandlinger med Storbritannien vedrørende Domstolens kompetence.
I would therefore argue for the rapid implementation of the ratification procedures and, at the same time, the start of in-depth negotiations with the United Kingdom regarding the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice.
Men jeg står også med andre spørgsmål.
But there are other questions that occur to me too.
Hvor længe endnu skal vi acceptere blokeringer eller undtagelsesklausuler fra britemes side: det sociale område, miljøpolitik, den fælles mønt, udenrigspolitik, borgemes sikkerhed?
How much longer are we going to accept British obstructions and opt-out clauses: the social chapter, envhonment policy, the single currency, foreign policy, public security?
Nu er det nok!
That wiU do for the present!
Og jeg håber virkelig, at regeringskonferencen finder frem til en effektiv løsning, så en enkelt medlemsstats modvilje ikke kan længere kan bremse alle de øvriges ønske om at fortsætte fremad.
And I reaUy do hope that the intergovernmental conference will find an effective way of ensuring that, in future, the recalcitrance of one Member State can no longer obstruct the determination of all the others to continue the march of progress.
At der fungerer en europæisk politienhed uden behørigt retsgrundlag er egentlig uacceptabelt.
It is unacceptable really to have a European police force with no proper basis in law.
Dertil kommer, som nævnt af andre parlamentsmedlemmer, at der er uenighed om retskontrol på europæisk plan med denne politienhed.
Moreover, there was some disagreement about jurisdiction over this poUce force at European level.
Fjorten ministre gik ind for, at De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol skulle inddrages, én minister var imod, Storbritanniens minister, hvilket betyder, at Domstolen indtil videre ikke figurerer i teksten til Europol-konventionen. Deter en skandale!
Fourteen ministers wanted it to be answer able to the European Court of Justice, but one minister, the UK minister, was against that, and as a result the text of the Europol Convention does not mention the Court of Justice.
Også Den Liberale Gruppe, som jeg tilhører, er af den opfattelse, at den engelske regering hurtigst muligt bør ændre standpunkt.
My Group too, the Liberals, believes that the British Government needs to change its stance as fast as possible.
Vi håber, at det ikke varer længe nok til at vælgerne i Storbritannien formår at åbne disse sager igen.
We hope it wül not be too long before British voters are given a clear view of this issue.
Caccavale (UPE). - (LT) Hr. formand, jeg er en af disse europæiske borgere, der har respekt for loven, betaler sine skatter og har to grundlæggende forventninger til de europæiske institutioner.
Caccavale (UPE). - (TT) Mr President.
Den første er frihed, og den anden er sikkerhed.
I am one of those European citizens who respect the law, pay taxes and have two basic expectations as regards the European institutions: the first is freedom and the second is security.
Den demokratiske kontrol med denne politienhed er nu lagt i hænderne på femten nationale parlamenter, hvilket natur ligvis ikke fungerer.
The rules governing this police force mean that it has to be democratically accountable to fifteen national parliaments, and if course that is not workable.
Det er ikke demokratisk kontrol.
There is no democratic control there.
Denne demokratiske kontrol skal foregå her.
Democratic control has to be exercised here.
Politiaktiviteter skal være underlagt demokratisk kontrol.
Police activities must be open to democratic scrutiny.
For så vidt angår den første forventning, har de europæiske institutioner allerede spillet fallit i mange henseender.
As regards the first expectation, the European institutions have already failed in many ways.
Det, der skulle være den frie ret til bevægelighed for borgerne, som skulle træde i kraft i 1993 ved afskaffelse af kontrollen ved grænserne og de uværdige køer ved disse, visse former for bureaukratisk praksis og forevisning af dokumenter af forskellig slags har ynkeligt spillet fallit.
What ought to have been free movement of persons and to have come into force as from 1993, with the abolition of controls and uncivilized queues at frontiers, certain bureaucratic practices, presentation of documents and certificates, has been a wretched failure.
Det er meget godt og vigtigt, at de indre grænser i Den Europæiske Union bortfalder.
It is a good thing, it is important that internal borders in the European Union are done away with.
Vigtigt for borgerne.
Important to our citizens.
Problemet er bare, at kriminaliteten allerede for længst har droppet disse grænser, medens politi og retsvæsen stadig i høj grad er underlagt dem.
The problem is that crime has long ignored frontiers, whilst police and justice authorities have obediently respected them.
Det er væsentligt, at mafiaen bekæmpes, men det gælder også om at bekæmpe den kinesiske triade og de colombianske narkokarteller, som opererer i Europa.
We need to contain the mafia, but also the Chinese triads, the Colombian drug cartels which operate in Europe.
Politisamarbejde på europæisk plan er altså hårdt tiltrængt.
Police cooperation in Europe is thus essential.
Hvad bør der ske? To ting.
So what are we to do?
For det første bør den britiske regering ophæve blokeringen af Domstolen. Det bør dette Parlament i sin helhed anmode om.
Firstly, the UK Government has to lift its veto on the Court of Justice.
For det andet bør beslutningsprocessen vedrørende denne type sager ændres på den kommende regeringskonference, hvilket der blev vedtaget en beslutning om i går.
Secondly, decisionmaking on this kind of thing must be changed at the forthcoming Intergovernmental Conference - we adopted a resolution on it yesterday.
Vetoretten bør afskaffes.
The veto must be abolished.
Nuvel, jeg håber, at det i det mindste i sikkerhedsspørgsmålet vil lykkes for os at tale klart til vore borgere.
I hope that at least on security we shall succeed in being clear and transparent towards our citizens.
Jeg er glad for det arbejde, der er udført af hr. Aldo med denne betænkning, som er meget velafbalanceret.
I applaud the work done by Mr Nassauer with this report, which is very well-considered and balanced.
Men jeg siger, og jeg siger klart, at der er et absolut behov for et instrument som Europol, der med hensyn til data og oplysninger kan forbinde alle de forskel lige undersøgelsesinstanser inden for de forskellige nationale myndigheder.
I say, however, and I say clearly, that there is an absolute need for an instrument such as Europol, able to link together, in terms of facts and information, all the various investigation departments of the various national authorities.
Det er klart, at den organiserede kriminalitet allerede helt har overvundet disse berømte indre grænser, vore tåbelige og ufrugtbare indre. grænser, der alene tjener til at skabe hindringer for borgerne.
It is clear that organized crime has easily transcended those famous internal frontiers, our stupid and futile internal frontiers, which serve only to create obstacles to citizens.
Den organiserede kriminalitet har allerede sat sig i besiddelse af de økonomiske og produktive vitale dele af den europæiske
Organized crime has already seized the economic and productive nerve centres of the European economy by means of much more sophisticated instruments than our poor stupid internal frontiers.
Eriksson (GUE/NGL). - (SV) Hr. formand, det er fuld stændig rigtigt, sådan som der står i denne betænkning, at borgerne er foruroligede over den voksende kriminalitet.
Eriksson (GUE/NGL). - (SV) Mr President, it is certainly important, as the present report says, that people are worried about rising crime.
Det er den form for vold og forbrydelser, som offentligheden diskuterer og frygter mest, når talen er om kriminalitet. Men den form for kriminalitet får man ikke bugt med ved at oprette et fælles politi i EU.
Eriksson in the form of Europol and to adopt a basic potice law in which the rights of the police are guaranteed, but those of the citizens, the civil rights standards, are left unspecified.
Euro pol - det bliver naturligvis lovprist som mirakelvåbnet mod enhver form for kriminalitet, og meget af snakken går på den indre sikkerhed. Det snakker De også om.
Europol is of course being hailed as the wonder weapon against all forms of crime, and there is much talk of internal security.
Men om retssikkerhed tales der ikke.
But no one talks about legal security.
For de forbrydelsers vedkommende, der kræver samar bejde mellem nationer - de forbrydelser, der er anført under betænkningens punkt 2 - anbefaler vi fra det svenske Venstrepartis side et bedre samarbejde inden for Interpols rammer; den velorganiserede kriminalitet står ikke stille og bevæger sig ikke kun inden for EU's grænser.
For the kind of crime which requires cooperation among states, crimes of the kinds Usted in point 2 of the report, we on the Swedish left would recommend improved cooperation within the framework of Interpol; well-organised crime does not stop at or operate only within the borders of the EU.