natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I øvrigt beklager jeg, og jeg har selv skrevet et brev herom, den lange og uforholdsmæssigt skæve udsendelse i RTBF, som jeg ganske enkelt har fundet krænkende på sandhedsplan.
Moving on to another matter, I do deplore, and I have myself written a letter on the subject, the very long and heavily slanted RTBF report, which I found insulting if for no other reason than that it ignored the truth.
Når man giver en reportage, der anklager en institution, er det sædvanligt, at man giver denne ordet.
In my experience it is normal, when doing a report in which an institution stands accused, for the institution in question to have the right of reply.
Det siger sig selv, at repræsentanten for de fiskere, der driver ikkeindustrialiseret fiskeri, er helt berettiget til at tage til Bruxelles for at forsvare sin sag, men jeg kunne have ønsket mig, at den anden institution i forhandlingen - i dette tilfælde Kommissionen - kunne have givet sin egen version.
The representative of the nonindustrial fishermen does of course have every right to go to Brussels to state his case, but I do feel that the other negotiating partner - in this instance the Commission -should have been allowed to give its own version.
Jeg kommer endnu en gang tilbage til spørgsmålet om fattigdom.
I come back again to the question of poverty.
I betragtning af hele den vej, jeg har tilbage lagt, finder jeg det oprørende at skulle anklages for udnyttelse af ulandene.
In view of my track record so far, I find it disgusting that I should be accused of exploiting the developing countries.
Lad os endnu en gang se på aftalens indhold.
Let us remind ourselves of what is in the.agreement.
Den bestemmer, at 33 % af søfolkene skal være senegalesere. Den bestemmer, at mindst 16.000
It provides for 33 % of crews to be Senegalese.
Derfor vil jeg som medlem af Budgetudvalget gerne lykønske Kommissionen for den hurtighed, hvormed den har fremsendt denne aftale til Parlamentet.
Bonino, Member of the Commission. - (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I shall not reiterate the main points of the fisheries agreement, which your rapporteur, Mrs Pery, has in any case explained to you quite admirably. bly.
De fisker djaboiï, der ikke skal forarbejdes.
fish for djaboi', which does not need processing.
Aftalen omhandler også en videnskabelig iagttager om bord.
The agreement also provides for a scientific observer to be on board.
Den siger endvidere, at 50 % af afgifterne skal betales til en fiskerisektor af den senegalesiske regering.
This agreement provides for 50 % of the total compensation to be used in the fisheries sector by the Senegalese government.
Men, hr. Jöns, vi taler om en aftale mellem suveræne parter.
But, Mrs Jöns, we are negotiating agreements with sovereign States.
Man kan så forhandle med dem og drøfte, hvad de finder godt for udviklingen af deres land. Men det er klart, at vi ikke kan give dem besked på, hvad de skal gøre vedrø rende akvakultur eller andet.
Well, we can negotiate and discuss with them what is best for their country's development, but obviously we are not going to tell them what to do, about aquaculture or anything else.
Der løber en drøftelse, og der er klart tale om en forhandling med en suveræn stat.
Talks are in progress and, as I say, these negotiations are with sovereign States.
At der er tale om en ny aftale, der er indgået i medfør af Traktatens artikel 130, er et bevis på, at der også mellem Kommissionens tjenestegrene, GD XIV og GD VIII, er blevet etableret et nært samarbejde om et mål, vi har til fælles, nemlig at indgå paritetiske aftaler, det er velafbalancerede, og ikke aftaler, der forfordeler en af parterne.
The fact that this is a new agreement, which has been concluded in accordance with Article 130 of the Treaty, is proof that even between Commission departments, be tween DG XIV and DG VIII, close collaboration and close cooperation has been established in our pursuit of an objective that is common to us all, namely to conclude, jointly, evenly-balanced agreements, rather than agree ments that are to the detriment of either of the parties.
Endnu et forhold. Det tilkommer denne stat at vurdere bestandene i sine egne farvande.
My second point is that it is up to every State to carry out its own evaluation of fish stocks in its own waters.
Man kan gøre det i fællesskab, dersom staten ønsker det, men som udgangspunkt henhører spørgsmålet under denne.
We can do that together if the State wants it, but ultimately it is for them to decide.
Vi har ikke mulighed for at pålægge den at lade os foretage en evaluering af bestandene.
We cannot go demanding that they leave the evaluation of stocks to us.
Dersom den ikke vil dette, fordi det er dens farvande, har den ret til at nægte os adgang.
If they do not want that because the waters in question are theirs, they are within their rights to deny us access to them.
Sandbæk (I-EDN). - Fru Bonino misforstod noget, jeg sagde.
Sandbæk (I-EDN). - (DA) Mrs Bonino misunderstood something I said.
I Udviklingsudvalget havde vi besøg af en delegation, der repræsenterede fiskerne selv, og det var dem, som bad os om at stemme imod handelsaftalen, fordi de er bekymrede over, at der er givet adgang inden for 12-mile-zonen.
The Committee on Development and Cooperation received a visit from a delegation represent ing the fishermen themselves, and it was they who asked us to vote against the trade agreement, because they are concerned at the fact that access has been given to their fishery within the twelve-mile zone.
Det er også derfor, at vi beder om, at der foretages en sådan midtvejsregulering, hvis det viser sig, at deres bekymringer rent faktisk har bund i virkeligheden.
That is also why we are asking for a midterm review, if it should turn out that their concern has a basis in reality.
Alt dette er muligt, men det forudsætter, at flåderne og vore redere ønsker det.
All these things are possible; all it needs is for the fleets and shipbuilders to want it too.
Gallagher (UPE). - (EN) Hr. formand, det er meget vigtigt, at kommissæren over for Parlamentet bekræfter, at hun ikke mente, at oplysningerne i min betænkning, som det tog mig mange uger at udarbejde, ikke var rigtige.
Gallagher (UPE). - Mr President, it is very important that the Commissioner should confirm to this House the implication that the information in my report, which I spent many weeks preparing, was not factual.
Jeg er uenig med kommissæren i hendes kritik af mig, når hun sagde, at den ikke havde noget at gøre med Spanien, og hun antydede, at jeg ikke har nævnt Spanien.
I challenge the Commissioner in her criticism of me when she said that it had nothing to do with Spain and when she suggested that I should not have referred to it.
Jeg vil foreslå tiende at sætte sig ind i betænkningerne om både Mauritius og Senegal.
I would suggest to her that she should acquaint herself with the reports on both Mauritius and Senegal.
Jeg ønsker forholdene afklaret her i Parlamentet.
I want to put the record straight in this House.
Jeg ønskede ikke strid.
I was not being contentious.
Jeg sagde blot noget rent faktisk.
I was merely stating a fact.
Jeg gav ikke udtryk for mine egne personlige synspunkter, men Fiskeriudvalgets.
I was not giving my own personal views but those of the Committee on Fisheries.
I betænkningen hedder det, at forøgelsen af antallet af fiskerfartøjer, der fisker tun med vod, har givet de spanske fartøjer fordele.
Mrs McKenna, as regards the midterm review, an annual assessment of the agreement, of the kind we have already undertaken to perform is one thing, a midterm review is quite another.
Så jeg opfordrer kommissæren til at afklare forholdene her og nu og ikke plette min integritet her i Parlamentet.
This was never part of our negotiating mandate and it is not in the agreement that we have made with the Senegalese authorities who, moreover, never even required it.
Fru McKenna, for så vidt angår midtvejsrevisionen er det én ting at foretage en evaluering hvert år af aftalen, hvilket vi allerede er i færd med at gøre, men noget andet er en midtvejsrevision.
So when you ask me to review the agreement in two years time in order, if necessary, to renegotiate it, my answer is no, precisely because the agreement has already been negotiated and because it is an important guarantee of stability for the two partners.
Denne side af sagen indgik ikke i mit forhandlingsmandat, og det er ikke den aftale, vi har truffet med de senegalesiske myndigheder, som i øvrigt end ikke har anmodet herom.
Frankly I find it quite astonishing that anyone should insist on a midterm review, which does not form part of the agreement, when no-one else, not even the Senegalese, has asked for it.
Men når De nu anmoder mig om at revidere aftalen i løbet af to år for eventuelt at genforhandle denne, må jeg svare nej, netop fordi aftalen er blevet indgået, og den er et vigtigt stabiliserende element for de to partnere.
The report states that the increase in the number of tuna seiners has made it possible for Spanish vessels to benefit.
Jeg finder det rent ud sagt aldeles overraskende, at en midtvejsrevision, der ikke indgår i aftalen, kræves nu, selvom ingen, end ikke senegaleserne, har anmodet herom.
So I challenge the Commissioner to put the record straight here and now and not to besmirch my integrity in this House.
Jeg stillede kommissæren et direkte spørgsmål.
I asked the Commissioner a direct question.
Jeg takker for hendes svar, men hun undlod at omtale dette ret kritiske spørgsmål om, hvorledes folk får adgang til disse aftaler. Er der en procedure, hun kan skitsere?
I thank her for her reply but she omitted to mention this rather critical point about how people get access to these agreements.
Yderligere har jeg her hørt, at de senegalesiske myndigheder modsatte sig denne aftale.
I have heard it said here that the Senegalese authorities were opposed to this agreement.
Det overrasker mig derfor fordi det er netop det modsatte, jeg har konstateret i alle de kontakter, jeg har haft med alle de senegalesiske myndigheder fra førsteministeren til fiskeriministeren via alle de øvrige ministre, og fru Pery er udmærket bekendt hermed.
I am absolutely amazed, because in all my contacts with the Senegalese authorities, from Prime Minister to Fisheries Minister and on downwards through all the other ministries - and Mrs Pery knows this very well - I found the exact opposite to be the case.
For så vidt angår dem, der har givet udtryk for betænkeligheder, er der tale om den ansvarlige for det ikkeindustrialiserede fiskeri.
As for those who have expressed concerns, they all seemed to have nonindustrial fishing on their minds.
Jeg gentager, at vi fisker 25.000 tons djaboi, mens det ikkeindustrialiserede fiskeri fanger i alt 400.000 tons. Dersom denne sektor anvender visse foranstaltninger for god forvaltning af fiskeriet med kano, kan det hjælpe den.
Let me repeat: our catch will be 25 000 tonnes of djaboi, while nonindustrial fishing accounts for 400 000 tonnes.
Vi fisker kun djaboi med indtil 25.000 tons som en accessorisk fangst for ikke at kaste den over bord igen.
We shall only be landing 25 000 tonnes of djaboi as a by-catch, so as not to discard it.
Djaboi er den fisk, der giver senegaleserne føden - den eneste, de spiser - og den fiskes fra kanoer med op til 400.000 tons uden nogen forvaltning af bestanden.
It is djaboi' that feeds the Senegalese - the only fish they eat - and it is fished by fishermen in their dugout canoes, at the rate of 400 000 tonnes, with no management of stocks.
Jeg præciserer dette for at gøre tingene helt klare.
I am telling you this to make things very clear.
Jeg mener nu at have svaret næsten alle i et forsøg på at forklare mig endnu en gang.
I believe I have been able to give some kind of an answer to everyone, having to explain myself once more.
På den anden side kommer jeg ikke tilbage til aftalen med Mauritius, fordi alt er sagt.
I am not proposing to go over the Mauritius agreement again, because everything that there was to say has been said.
Jeg vil dog udtrykke min tilfredshed med det bedre samarbejde, som er ved at komme i stand med Parlamen
I am pleased to see the beginnings of improved cooperation with Parliament.
Hvad angår Deres anmodning, hr. Macartney, er der tale om åbne aftaler.
Regarding your request, Mr Macartney, these are open agreements.
Nye medlemmer kan tiltræde.
New Member States can come in.
Proceduren er følgende: Normalt underrettes medlemsstaterne om de nye muligheder, og derefter underretter de deres egen sektor.
The procedure is as follows: normally Member States are informed of the new possibilities and then they inform their own sector.
Det er således medlemsstaterne eller COREPER eller ambassadørerne, der underretter deres egne regeringer, som forudsættes at underrette deres egen sektor. Dette er den sædvanlige procedure. Vi kunne naturligvis også
So it is the Member States, or the COREPER, or the ambassadors, who inform their own governments which are supposed to inform their own sector.
Bonino give oplysninger gennem medlemmerne af Europa-Parlamentet.
Bonino information through the European Parliamentarians.
Men proceduren fungerer på denne måde.
But the procedure operates in this way.
systematisk og afbalanceret. Dels stræber vi efter det indre marked, dels har vi i tilstrækkelig grad øje for kulturelle forskelle. Også industrien bør påtage sig et ansvar og sørge for gode, nationale selvreguleringskodekser i alle europæiske lande og helst i sidste instans én europæisk kodeks.
resolution is systematic and well-balanced, trying to secure the internal market on the one hand, while making allowance for cultural differences on the other.
Industrien bør også styrke sine aktioner med henblik på de grænseoverskridende klageprocedurer for forbrugere.
It must also do more to improve cross-border complaints procedures for consumers. ers.
Hr. formand, jeg var derfor meget overrasket, da der i torsdags blev forelagt en hel bunke ændringsforslag, som i mine øjne underminerer det indre marked.
You can therefore imagine my astonishment when a whole pile of amendments appeared last Thursday which to my mind completely undermine the internal market.
Hvad der også overraskede mig, var, at De Grønne, De Uafhængige for Nationernes Europa og socialisterne i en række ændrings forslag ordret har forelagt nøjagtigt den samme tekst. Jeg spørger mig selv, om det er et tilfælde, at det også ordret er de tekster, som BEUC, Den Europæiske Forbrugerorganisation, foreslår i sit brev af 8. juli.
I was also very surprised to see that the Greens, the Europe of Nations Group and the Socialists all submitted amend ments with precisely the same wording, and I wonder whether it is just a coincidence that it is also the exact wording proposed by the BEUC, the European Consumers Organization, in its letter of 8 July.
Vi afviser alle ensådan påvirkning fra de multinationale selskaber. Jeg husker endnu, hvor vred denne Forsamling har været herover.
We reject any such attempt by the multinationals to influence us, particularly remembering how this has angered the House before.
Jeg afviser en sådan påvirkning fra alle interesse grupper.
I reject any such attempt to influence us by any interest groups whatsoever.
Formanden. - Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænk ning A4-0219/97 af Larive for Udvalget om Økonomi, Valutaspørgsmål og Industripolitik om Kommissionens grønbog om kommerciel kommunikation i det indre mar ked (KOM(96)0192 - C4-0365/96) Ordførere for udtalelser: (*) Lehne for Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse Aironi for Udvalget om Kultur, Ungdom, Uddannelse og Medier Añoveros Trias de Bes for Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder (Hughes-proceduren).
President - The next item is the report (A4-0219/97) by Mrs Larive, on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, on the Commission Green Paper on commercial communications in the internal market (COM(96)0192 - C4-0365/96) Draftsmen(*) Mr Lehne, on behalf of the Committee on the Environ ment, Public Health and Consumer Protection Mr Aironi, on behalf of the Committee on Culture; Youth, Education and the Media Mr Añoveros Trias de Bes, on behalf of the Committee eon Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights (""Hughes' procedure)
Larive (ELDR), ordfører. - (NL) Ophævelsen af unødige hindringer for grænseoverskridende reklame, direkte mar keting, sponsorering og megen kommerciel kommunikation er og bliver national, og det betyder, at den kun er bundet til nationale regler.
Larive (ELDR), rapporteur. - (NL) The removal of unnecessary barriers to cross-border advertising, direct marketing, sponsorship and much commercial communication is a national issue, and as such is subject only to national legislation.
Europas rigdom er dets kulturelle mangfoldighed, og derfor blander vi os med rette ikke i forskelle i nationale regler, forudsat, hr. Blokland, at disse regler er proportionale og ikke diskriminerer og hindrer den grænseoverskridende kommercielle kommunikation.
Europe's wealth lies in its cultural diversity, and this is why we are right not to concern ourselves with discrepancies between national rules and regulations - provided, Mr Blokland, that they are proportionate and that cross-border commercial communication is not obstructed or discriminated against.
På grund af Hughes-proceduren, som er anvendt, er udtalelserne fra Retsudvalget, Kulturudvalget og Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse taget til efterretning i Økonomiudvalgets beslutningsforslag.
Under the Hughes procedure, our resolution has taken account of the opinions from the Legal Affairs Committee, the Commit tee on Culture and the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection.
I fællesskab har vi rettet en alvorlig fejl i grønbogen, nemlig større forbrugerbeskyttelse er nødvendig, og det bruges nu en fjerdedel af teksten i Økonomi udvalgets beslutningsforslag på.
Together we have sought to rectify a serious shortcoming in the Green Paper in that greater protection is needed for consumers, and a quarter of the text of the resolution by the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs is now devoted to this.
Vort forslag om sammensætningen af det udvalg, som skal bedømme klager, er i den forbindelse væsentligt. Ikke en klub af udelukkende tjenestemænd, som bag lukkede døre ordner sagen, således som Kommissionen foreslår, nej, et trepartsudvalg, hvor det offentlige, industrien og forbru gerorganisationer i fællesskab, på lige fod, undersøger klagerne.
A vital element here is our proposal regarding the constitution of the complaints committee, which should not just be a group of officials arranging things behind closed doors, as the Commission proposes, but instead a tripartite committee in which representatives of government, industry and consumer organizations deal with complaints together on an equal footing.
Endelig er der den strid mellem oprindelsesland og mod tagerland, som hele tiden nævnes i disse ændringsforslag.
Finally, there is the controversy over country of origin and country of destination, which comes up several times in the amendments.
Traktatens artikel 59 siger, at restriktioner, der hindrer fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser inden for Fællesskabet, grad vis afskaffes.
Article 59 of the Treaty says that restrictions on freedom to provide services within the Community are to be progressively abolished.
Ifølge traktaten: Hvis en tjenesteydelse overholder oprindelseslandets regler og alligevel underkastes andre regler i modtagerlandet, så er det en restriktion af den frie bevægelighed.
If a service complies with the rules of the country of origin and is still subject to other rules in the country of destination, then that constitutes a restriction to freedom of movement.
Artikel 59 sigter mod at ophæve sådanne barrierer, således at det bliver normen, at kontrol foretages af oprindelseslandet.
Article 59 aims to remove barriers so that controls by the country of origin become the norm.
Betyder det så, at kontrol foretaget af modtagerlandet altid er i strid med traktaten?
Does this mean that controls by the country of destination are always contrary to the Treaty?
Nej, for restriktionen kan være i overensstemmelse med traktaten, hvis den er proportional, og det betyder, at den ekstra foranstaltning skal svare til det opstillede mål, og at dette mål ikke kan nås med mindre restriktive foranstaltninger.
No, because a restriction can be consistent with the Treaty if it is proportionate, which means that the particular measure must be proportionate with the in tended objective and the objective cannot be achieved using less restrictive measures.
Så er kontrol foretaget af modtagerlandet tilladt. I dette tilfælde er harmonisering den eneste måde, hvorpå den frie bevægelighed kan opnås.
Under these circumstances, controls by the country of destination are permit ted, and harmonization is the only way to achieve freedom of movement.
Hvis man ikke vil have det, så findes der for denne specielle tjenesteydelse ikke noget indre marked. Hvis foranstaltningen imidlertid ikke anses for at være proportional, fordi den f.eks. kun sigter mod at beskytte den lokale industri, så er den uforenelig med traktaten.
If people refuse to accept this, then there is no internal market for that particular service.
I den forbindelse skal, om nødvendigt, artikel 169 anvendes.
If necessary, Article 169 must be invoked.
Domstolen bekræftede så sent som i sidste uge princippet om oprindelseslandet i d'Agostino-sagen.
The Court of Justice confirmed the country-of-origin principle just last week in the Agostino case.
Europa-Parlamentet gjorde det i direktivet »Fjernsyn uden grænser«.
The European Parliament did the same with the 'Television without frontiers' directive.
Det er den akse, hvorom det indre marked drejer.
It is the axis around which the internal market revolves.
Og glem ikke, at princippet om oprindelseslandet giver forbrugerne bedre adgang til effektive klageprocedurer. For først da kan retssystemet i det land, hvor anklagede medier og annoncører er etableret, anvendes med det samme.
And let us not forget that the country-of-origin principle gives consumers greater access to efficient complaints procedures, because it is only then that the legal system of the country of establishment of media and advertisers accused of infringements can be directly applied.
Beslutningsforslaget består af tre dele.
The resolution forms a triptych.
For det første finder De i leddene al detaljeret europæisk lovgivning om forbrugerbeskyttelse og om mindreårige. Al den lovgiv ning, som kommerciel kommunikation også skal opfylde, for øvrigt også på Internet, for hvad der er illegalt off-line, er også illegalt on-line.
First, the indents give details of all the European legislation on consumer protection and the protection of minors with which commercial communication must comply, including the Internet, be cause what is illegal off-line is just as illegal on-line.
For det andet er der betragtningerne. Deri gøres der rede for det indre markeds grund principper.
Secondly, the recitals set out the basic principles of the internal market.
Endelig står der i punkterne de konkrete forslag til styrkelse og supplering af grønbogen.
Finally, the main body of the text contains specific proposals to reinforce and supplement the Green Paper, a document which we nevertheless regard as a sound basis for action.
En grønbog, som vi for øvrigt synes er en god bog, en god impuls til handling.
In conclusion, we hope to achieve a balanced approach which takes account both of the completion of the internal market and also of cultural differences.
Foruden dette trepartsudvalg vil vi have, at den foreslåede metodologi til vurdering af proportionalitet beskyttes.
In addition to the tripartite committee, we also want the proposed mechanism for assessing proportionality to be safeguarded.
Vi vil have en databank, et europæisk kontaktpunkt, en SLIM-analyse af sektoren, og Kommissionen bør i sin rolle som traktaternes vogter anvende artikel 169 meget mere seriøst og konsekvent.
We want there to be a data bank, a European contact point and a SLIM analysis of the sector, and as the guardian of the Treaties, the Commission should apply Article 169 much more firmly and consistently.