natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Men under alle omstændigheder vil jeg rette mig efter resultatet af en eventuel afstemning.
In this case, the derogation is justified by the proportion of non-national voters residing in one Member State of the Union, namely Luxembourg, which is far higher than the average, and I would like to add that the derogation is in fact consistent with the prospect of integration.
FORMANDEN. - Jeg foreslår, at vi stemmer om, hvor vidt vi skal afbryde mødet for at afvente, at Rådets formand indfinder sig, eller fortsætte forhandlingen.
To conclude, I am glad that the work carried out in difficult conditions and with little time is highly likely to be concluded in good time for next June's elections, inspite of the delay in the entry into force of the Treaty on the Union.
Men der er jo også den anden forespørgsel, og jeg anmoder hr. Bourlanges om ligeledes at udtale sig, såfremt han ønsker det.
Since I have a few seconds left, I would also like to reply to one comment made on the role of the Council.
BOURLANGES (PPE). - (FR) Fru formand jeg vil gerne have præciseret hr. Barón Crespos forslag.
PRESIDENT. - The debate is closed.
MUSSO (RDE). - (FR) Fru formand, De må have mig undskyldt, men i forlængelse af hr. Froment-Meurices bemærkning vil jeg gerne påpege, at der på den dagsorden, jeg har liggende foran mig, er anført: »Afstemning kl. 12.00 om de følgende forslag til beslutning« og nedenunder: »de øvrige forslag til beslutning, hvorom forhandlingen er afsluttet med undtagelse af dem, der vedrører gennemførelsen af Fællesakten og traktaten om
BARON CRESPO (PSE). - (ES) Madam President, I would also ask for the debate on these oral questions to be postponed, since the Committee on Foreign Affairs has already put the question to the Commission and the Council. I am aware that Council may not be obliged to answer because we are in a state of transitional legislation, as the Treaty came into force on 1 November, along with Parliament's new Rules of Procedure, and we have gone from 5 to 3 weeks.
Går hans forslag ud på, at forhandlingen blot udsættes nogle minutter, eller går det ud på, at den slet ikke
In short, it is a moot point but the fact remains that the European Council on the 29th had in-depth discussions on enlargement and decisions were taken.
BOURLANGES først at behandle de to mundtlige forespørgsler, under afstemning.
PRESIDENT adjournment of this debate.
Dette indebærer, at vi nu indleder forhandlingen under et med de to mundtlige forespørgsler til Kommissionen.
It is important that this debate should be held today, but in a manner worthy of Parliament and the Community institutions.
afholdes i dag, hvormed hele proceduren vil blive forsinket og afstemningen ikke kunne gennemføres i aften?
PRESIDENT. - I thank you for your remarks, but I should like to make the following proposal, Mr Chair man, even so.
Det er to absolut forskellige perspektiver.
First, a word about the documents.
Den sidstnævnte løsning er ikke ønskværdig, eftersom der i aften vil være mange medlemmer til stede ved afstemningen.
First, on my paper the oral question is put to the Commission, not the Council. If you will, I propose that we open the debate, otherwise we shall have to wait a quarter of an hour.
Og det er af allerstørste vigtighed, at Parlamentet afsender et klart budskab, navnlig til Rådet.
We are already behind hand today and it really would be a pity not to continue the debate since the Commission and yourself are present.
(Forslaget forkastedes) (Mødet udsat kl. 11.05 og genoptaget kl. 11.45)
In my opinion it would be better to continue, rather than to wait until the Council is present.
Jeg mener derfor, det er vigtigt at anlægge en helhedsbetragtning på spørgsmålet om procedure, og derfor tilslutter jeg mig personligt Deres forslag, fru formand.
MIRANDA DA SILVA (CG). - (PT) Madam President, just a note on this question. I think that at the moment we are not in a position to alter the agenda.
FORSÆDE: Nicole PERY Næstformand
This decision was not just made in a haphazard way.
FORMANDEN. - Jeg gør Dem opmærksom på, hr. Barón Crespo, at Rådets fly ankommer i lufthavnen kl. 11.15.
GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO (PPE). - (FR) Madam President, it is a question of two oral questions to the Commission.
Jeg anmoder Dem om at fortsætte debatten om dette spørgsmål.
Either way, should you wish to call a vote on this, I will bow to the outcome.
FORMANDEN. - Mine damer og herrer, det er en frustrerende situation.
I would agree with Mr Barón Crespo if there was not this shortage of time.
Jeg vil derfor igen høre Parlamentet for at fastslå, om det står fast på sin beslutning om først af påbegynde forhandlingen under et, når Rådet er til stede.
PRESIDENT. - I propose that you vote either to suspend the sitting until the Council is present to participate, or that we continue the debate.
BARÓN CRESPO (PSE). - (ES) Fru formand, på dags ordenen for i dag er der opført en forhandling under et om Rådets og Kommissionens redegørelser efterfulgt af mundtlige forespørgsler.
BOURLANGES (PPE). - (FR) Madam President, I should appreciate clarification of exactly what it is that President Baron Crespo is proposing.
Jeg insisterer derfor på, at Rådets formand først skal orientere medlemmerne, således at vi bliver i stand til at stille ham de relevante spørgsmål.
PRESIDENT. -1 therefore put the proposal to change the agenda and to take first the two oral questions. This of course would mean that we will continue the debate on the two questions addressed to the Commission.
GALLAND (LDR). - (FR) Fru formand, dette viser helt klart, at vi ikke både kan afvikle afstemningstiden efter den fastsatte tidsplan og afvikle forhandlingen i den fastsatte rækkefølge.
(Parliament rejected this proposal)
Det er efter min mening et spørgsmål om Parlamentets værdighed.
Is he proposing that we delay the debate by a few minutes or that the debate should not be held at all today, which would delay the whole procedure and mean that we could not vote this evening? That is not at all the same thing.
Hvad angår det af hr. Bourlanges stillede spørgsmål, fremgår det efter min mening klart, at jeg ikke anmoder om udsættelse af forhandlingen.
I think it would be most disturbing if we were to opt for the latter solution, because this evening we shall have a large number of colleagues in the House for voting time.
Jeg foreslår, at De, fru formand, hvis medlemmerne er enige heri - men eventuelt skal spørgsmålet sættes under afstemning - giver ordet til Kommissionens formand for en redegørelse for Kommissionens vurdering af Det Europæiske Råds møde, indtil afstemningstiden kl. 12.00.
So I think we must have an eye to the procedure as a whole and for that reason I myself endorse the proposal which you have made, Madam President.
HOWELL (PPE). - (EN) Fru formand, jeg forstår til fulde Deres problem som formand.
PRESIDENT. - Ladies and gentlemen, I am irritated as we all are.
Så vidt jeg har forstået, har hr. Barón Crespo nogle spørgsmål til Kom missionen.
We decided to suspend the sitting for half an hour to wait for the Council.
Er det ikke mest hensigtsmæssigt at anmode hr. Barón Crespo om først at stille disse, således at Kommissionen kan svare for egen regning i stedet for at komme ind på spørgsmål, der også involverer Rådet?
The most recent information I have is that the Council will not be here very shortly.
MIRANDA DA SILVA (CG). - (PT) Fru formand, en enkelt bemærkning til dette spørgsmål.
PRESIDENT. - I would point out, Mr Barón Crespo, that the Council's plane will arrive at 11.15 a.m. at the airport.
Vi kan efter min mening ikke nu give os til at ændre arbejdsplanen.
That means that the sitting will be suspended for 30 minutes, if not more.
Derfor kan vi efter min mening ikke ændre arbejdsplanen nu.
I think that would be very regrettable, given the work ahead of us.
Og hvis vi afventer rådsformandens ankomst, skal vi ikke blot vente et kvarter, men over en halv time.
There is still a quarter of an hour before the votes.
BARÓN CRESPO (PSE). - (ES) Fru formand Jeg sidder stadig med det problem, at det er Rådet, der træffer beslutning i denne sag, og at det derfor er Rådet, der har pligt til at informere.
GALLAND (LDR). - (FR) Madam President, this shows clearly that we cannot now have both voting and the debate originally intended.
Jeg ville være enig med hr. Barón, hvis vi ikke havde de fastsatte tidsfrister at tage hensyn til. Jeg foreslår, at De hører Parlamentet om anmodningen om nu at gå i gang med forhandlingen under et om de mundtlige forespørgsler til Kommissionen, fru formand.
I see, however, that the Commission President is in his place.
Derefter kan vi fortsætte med den øvrige dagsorden.
We are grateful, since his presence means that we can stick to our timetable at least in part.
BOURLANGES (PPE). - (FR) Fru formand, vi befinder os i en ret vanskelig situation.
BARON CRESPO (PSE). - (FR) Madam President, today's agenda said there would be a joint debate on statements by the Council and the Commission followed by oral questions.
Som formand Galland sagde, når vi ikke afstemningerne, hvis vi fører forhandlingen helt til ende, men er det rimeligt, at vi skal afbryde
I really do think the President of the Council must brief us first, so that we know what questions we need to ask him afterwards.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
I think there is a need here to show proper respect to Parliament.
BOURLANGES mier mest i øjeblikket, bør man, som forholdene er, prøve at gøre mere ud af anden fase.
GALLAND the Commission's statement on the European Council meeting and have voting time as scheduled.
drøftelserne, når Rådet når frem, efter at have mistet en halv time ved at vente på det?
HOWELL (PPE). - Madam President, I very much respect the problem which you face in the Chair.
Hvis forhandlingen skal have et vist niveau, synes jeg derfor, vi skal begynde med det samme i betragtning af, at Kommissionen, som de mundtlige spørgsmål er rettet til, er til stede.
Would it not be appropriate to ask Mr Barón Crespo is those could go forward in order that the Commission can answer for itself rather than compromise itself without the Council present?
Jeg vil herefter forelægge forsamlingen er forslag.
I think we can proceed in that way so that I can at least address the Council on behalf of my committee.
Jeg foreslår, at vi først lytter til formand Delors og så tager afstemningerne bagefter for at overholde dagsordenen.
In reality, since the movement in the European economies is not greatly towards convergence at present, we have to think about enriching stage two.
Derefter genoptager vi forhandlingen kl. 15, når Rådet er kommet til stede.
I hope that the European Parliament will help us in our deliberations here.
Større ambitioner udadtil.
PRESIDENT. - Thank you, Mr Bourlanges.
Det Europæiske Råd definere de, i overensstemmelse med Traktaten, fem fælles aktioner: fremme af stabiliteten i Europa, dvs. forhandlinger om Balladur-planen.
As laid down in the Treaty the European Council defined five areas in which joint measures will be taken: the promotion of stability in Europe, that is to say talks on the Balladur plan.
For det andet, støtte til fredsproces sen i Mellemøsten.
Secondly, support for the Middle Eastern peace process.
For det tredje: støtte til fredsproces sen i Sydafrika.
Thirdly, support for the process of democratization in South Africa.
For det fjerde: sikring af, at den humanitære hjælp i det tidligere Jugoslavien kommer frem.
Fourthly, the supply and distribution of humanitarian aid in the former Yugoslavia.
Og, for det femte: overvågning af valget den 12. december i Rusland, efter anmodning fra præsident Jeltsin selv.
And fifthly, monitoring of the Russian elections on 12 December, as requested by President Yeltsin himself.
To af de fælles aktioner blev iværksat i forlængelse af den efterfølgende samling i Ministerrådet, nemlig aktionen vedrørende det tidligere Jugoslavien og aktionen vedrørende Rusland.
Immediately after the subsequent Council of Ministers meeting two of the joint measures were put in hand, for the former Yugoslavia and for Russia.
DELORS, formand for Kommissionen. - (FR) Fru for mand, mine damer og herrer, den ekstraordinære samling i Rådet den 29. oktober blev afholdt efter enstemmigt ønske fra samtlige medlemsstater, som ønskede, at man under en eller anden form højtideligt markerede, at ratifikationsprocessen for den nye traktat var afsluttet, og gjorde et forsøg på at give den europæiske opbygning ny fremdrift.
DELORS, President of the Commission. - (FR) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the extraordinary Coun cil meeting held on 29 October was in response to a unanimous wish by all Member States in some way to mark formally the end of the process of ratifying the new Treaty and to try to impart a new momentum to the building of Europe.
Det belgiske formandskab havde for sin del opstillet fire målsætninger for den ekstraordinære samling.
The Belgian presidency had four objectives for this extraordinary Council.
Lad mig nævne hvilke.
Let me remind you what they were.
Med hensyn til dette er det bemærkelsesværdigt, at landene er mere og mere tiltrukket af at benytte den tredje søjle, dvs. indre og retlige anliggender.
Here it is interesting to see that Member States are increasingly interested in the third pillar, that is to say home affairs and justice.
Jeg tror, vi i de kommende måneder bliver vidne til stor aktivitet på dette område.
I think we shall see a lot going on in these areas over the next few months.
Det er noget, Kom missionen også arbejder på.
The Commission is working on that too.
Jeg overrasker Dem næppe, når jeg siger, at vi vil anmode ministrene om i første omgang at drøfte indvandringspolitikkerne.
You will not be surprised to hear that we shall start by asking the ministers for general affairs to look at immigration policies.
Deri ligger i realiteten nøglen til fremskridt på dette område.
Because this is the real key to progress.
Hvis landene forstår hinanden bedre, hvis de lærer hinandens synspunkter bedre at kende, bliver det muligt at overvinde mange vanskeligheder på området.
If the countries understand each other better in this area, if they appreciate their differences more clearly, a lot of difficulties can be overcome here.
For det første at sætte den nye traktat på skinner og træffe alle nødvendige foranstaltninger med henblik herpå.
One, to get the new Treaty launched, taking all the measures needed to achieve that.
For det andet at bekræfte prioriteringen af et nyt økonomisk opsving og understrege, at bekæmpelsen af arbejdsløsheden er det væsentligste hensyn.
Two, to reiterate that priority should be given to revitalizing the economy, stressing that our main concern was the reduction of unemployment.
For det tredje at fastlægge institutionernes hjemsteder efter to års forgæves drøftelser herom.
Three, to settle the question of siting the institutions, still unresolved after two years of vain discussions.
For det fjerde, i forbindelse med det tragiske spørgsmål vedrørende Jugoslavien, at sikre, i mangel af en fredelig løsning, at Fællesskabets hjælpeforsyningerne når frem i vintermånederne, og det til samtlige befolkningsgrupper i det tidligere Jugoslavien.
Four, concerning the tragedy of Yugoslavia and in the absence of any peaceful solution, to ensure that the Community organized efficient supplies of aid during the winter to all those living in the former Yugoslavia.
Endelig, for det fjerde: mere demokrati.
And fourthly, more democracy.
Det Europæiske Råd hilste de indgåede interinstitutionelle aftaler vel kommen, og jeg vil for min del geme takke Europa-Parlamentet for den åbenhed, det har udvist under for handlingerne om dem.
The European Council welcomed the signing of the interinstitutional agreements and I for my part wish to thank the European Parliament for its open-minded attitude whilst the interinstitutional agreements were being negotiated.
Efter at have hørt Deres forhandling i formiddag kan jeg tænke mig, at det ikke har været problemfrit for Dem, men at De har ønsket at gøre indrømmelser, således at de interinstitutionelle aftaler i fremtiden kan være en af de faktorer, der gør det lettere at demokratisere vore institutioner og at gøre dem mere effektive.
Having listened to your debate this morning I can imagine that there were some difficulties for you in that, but you were willing to make concessions, to ensure that the interinstitutional agreement can in future be something which helps our institutions to be more democratic and more effective.
Men jeg kan altså oplyse, at Kommissionen er villig til fra nu at lade proceduren for fælles beslutningstagen anvende fuldt ud.
The Belgian presidency achieved its four objectives and I for my part cannot but congratulate it, for the task was not an easy one.
Denne politik er nemlig endnu ikke blevet iværksat.
Then there is the application of joint decision-making.
Dette var, mener jeg, hovedindholdet af mødet i Det Europæiske Råd.
On this the Commission too wanted to demonstrate a
DELORS udforske og arbejde hen imod samt udstikke nogle retningslinjer, således at hvert enkelt land kan bidrage til at afhjælpe nedgangen i vor konkurrenceevne og den utilstrækkelige jobskabelse.
DELORS more open-minded attitude. Thus we replied to the President of Parliament that we were willing to transfer, into the new category of joint decisionmaking, those texts which were currently before Parliament but will in future be a matter for joint decision-making.
På mødet skal man i øvrigt -og jeg vil gerne henlede Deres opmærksomhed på dette, fer det bliver meget vanskeligt - for første gang skulle anvende artikel 103 i den nye traktat.
In the hope that you for your part can take account of the work we have done. But from now on the Commission will be applying this procedure of joint decisionmaking in full.
BARÓN CRESPO (PSE). - (ES) I morges læste jeg i en britisk avis, at den danske udenrigsminister havde udtalt, at alle forhandlingerne skal være afsluttet senest den 1. marts, således at Europa-Parlamentet kan afgive samstemmende udtalelse inden valgperiodens udløb.
BARON CRESPO (PSE). - (ES) This morning I read in a British newspaper some declarations made by the Danish minister for Foreign Affairs who said that everything would have to be concluded by the first of March, so that Parliament could give its assent before the end of the session.
Derfor stiller jeg følgende præcise spørgsmål: kan kommissions formanden fortælle os, om den danske udenrigsminister henviser til en beslutning truffet af Det Europæiske Råd?
So my question is very clear: can the Commission President tell us whether this is the decision adopted by the European Council?
For det er vigtigt, at medlemmerne nu, da mødesalen er ved at blive fyldt, kan få klarhed over dette spørgsmål.
Now that the Chamber is starting to fill up, I believe it is important for my colleagues to be informed of this matter.
DELORS, formand for Kommissionen. - (FR) Formand Barón Crespo, jeg kan kun læse op af Det Europæiske Råds beslutninger.
DELORS, President of the Commission. - (FR) President Barón, I can only quote the decisions of the European Council verbatim.
Jeg citerer: »Vi anser det for vigtigt at fremskynde forhandlingerne med Østrig, Finland, Norge og Sverige, således at disse lande kan optages den 1. januar 1995.
'We consider that it is important to speed up the negotiations with Austria, Finland, Norway and Sweden so that they can become members as of 1 January 1995.
Målet er at afslutte forhandlingerne inden den 1. marts 1994.« Hr. Helveg Petersen gentog med andre ord kun en beslutning fra Det Europæiske Råd.
The objective is to complete negotiations before 1 March 1994'.
Derefter kan Finansministerrådet træffe afgørelse om disse retningslinjer med kvalificeret flertal.
This then is a decision of the European Council which Mr Petersen is merely restating.
Vi har fire minutter til rådighed før afstemningerne.
What does this article say?
Hvis nogen ønsker at tage ordet som svar på hr. Delors' indlæg, så vil jeg give ham det i stedet for endnu en gang at afbryde forhandlingen i tre minutter.
It says that our economic policies are a matter of common interest and that the broad guidelines of economic policy are to be defined by the European Council.
FORMANDEN. - I den officielle loge vil jeg gerne byde hjertelig velkommen til medlemmerne af delegationen fra Republikken Kroatiens parlament, som er kommet til Strasbourg med henblik på det andet interparlamentariske møde mellem Europa-Parlamentet og det kroatiske parlament.
PRESIDENT. - I should like to welcome the members of a delegation from the Parliament of the Republic of Croatia, who have come to Strasbourg for the Second Inter-Parliamentary Meeting of the European Parliament and the Croatian Parliament, and who have taken their seats in the official gallery.
BARÓN CRESPO (PSE). - (ES) Fru formand, Kommissionens formand kom ikke ind på spørgsmålene om udvidelse og institutionelle reformer. Jeg forbeholder mig derfor ret til at stille spørgsmålet på det rette tidspunkt.
BARON CRESPO (PSE). - (ES) Madam President, the President of the Commission has not, to my knowledge, addressed the matter of enlargement nor that of institutional reform, Therefore, I still reserve the right to raise this question at the appropriate time.
I øvrigt takker jeg kommissionsformanden for hans oplysninger.
I would also thank him for the information he has provided.
DELORS, formand for Kommissionen. - (FR) Fru for mand, det var helt bevidst, at jeg ikke sagde noget om dette. Årsagen er, at hr. Van den Brock havde lejlighed til på Kommissionens vegne at gøre status over optagelsesforhandlingerne. forhandlingerne.
DELORS, President of the Commission. - (FR) Madam President, I deliberately chose not to talk about that because Mr Van den Broek has previously given an update on behalf of the Commission on the enlargement negotiations.
Dette møde ledes i fællesskab af hr. Mesic, formand for Republikken Kroatiens parlament, og hr. Avgerinos, formand for Europa-Parlamentets delegation.
This meeting will be chaired jointly by Mr Mesic, president of the parliament of the Croatian Republic, and Mr Avgerinos, chairman of the delegation from the European Parliament.
Vi tillæg ger hændelserne på det tidligere Jugoslaviens område en meget stor betydning.
We attach especial importance to events in the former Yugoslavia.
Parlamentet har vedtaget talrige beslutninger om dette spørgsmål.
Our House has adopted numerous resolutions on the subject.
Jeg er sikker på, at medlemmerne af vor Delegation for Forbindelserne med Republikkerne i Det Tidligere Jugoslavien vil intensivere deres viden under drøftelserne med vore kroatiske kolleger, og at dette møde vil føre til tættere forbindelser mellem vore organer.
I am certain that the members of our delegation for relations with the republics of former Yugoslavia will deepen their knowledge in their talks with our Croatian colleagues and that this meeting will lead to closer ties between our two organizations.
Jeg byder Dem endnu en gang på Parlamentets vegne hjertelig velkommen her.
On behalf of the House I wish you, once again, a hearty welcome.
På mødet kom Det Europæiske Råd, i forlængelse af to drøftelser i Rådet (almindelige anliggender), ind på spørgsmålet om udvidelsens institutionelle dimension.
On that occasion and following the two debates of the General Affairs Council the European Council discussed the institutional dimension of enlargement.
Efter en lang diskussion valgte man den fremgangsmåde at anmode det belgiske formandskab om at fremlægge et forslag på næste møde i Det Europæiske Råd.
After much debate the following procedure was agreed: the Belgian presidency was asked to put forward a proposal at the next European Council meeting.
Jeg har derfor fundet det rigtigst at lade det belgiske formand skab åbne forhandlingen herom og derefter lade hr. Van den Brock gøre rede for Kommissionens standpunkt.
This being the case I thought it best that the Belgian presidency should start off the debate and that Mr Van den Broek should then outline the Commission's views.
Jeg har derfor villet holde udvidelsesspørgsmålet uden for min orientering, således at der kunne være fuld sammen hæng i forhandlingen i eftermiddag.
This is why I sought to pick out the issue of enlargement in my statement so that this afternoon's debate can be fully coherent.