natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kirsten Jensen, Blak, Sindal og Iversen (PSE), skriftlig. - De danske socialdemokrater i Europa-Parlamentet har i dag stemt for Europa-Parlamentets betænkning om Kom missionens hvidbog om retlig beskyttelse af krypterede tjenester i det indre marked (høring om behovet for en EF-foranstaltning).
Ahlqvist, Theorin and Wibe (PSE), in writing. - (SV) The principle of subsidiarity was introduced as a political principle in Article 3b of the Treaty establishing the European Community and means that actions for those areas where the Community does not have sole jurisdiction shall be taken at the lowest level possible.
Piratvirksomheden inden for den audiovisuelle sektor er desværre for opadgående, hvilket betyder, at ophavsrettigheder i stigende grad bliver krænket.
The principle is not a supplement to Article 235, namely a means of giving the Community a new way of securing power at the expense of the Member States.
Man søger at opnå en væsentlig reduktion af luftforurening, som skyldes emission af forurenende luftarter og partikler fra forbrændingsmotorer til montering i mobile ikke-vejgående maskiner.
According to the rapporteur the principle has been a disadvantage for the EU but for the Member States and in particular for the general public we are totally convinced that it has only been to the good.
Første fase: Fra juni 1997 til december 1998.
Kristoffersen (PPE), in writing. - (DA) I welcome the fact that, as a result of the Maastricht Treaty, the Commis-
EU-medlemsstaternes lovgivning på området er meget uensartet og i mange tilfælde utilstrækkelig.
Our basic attitude is that Sweden joined an interstate cooperation group and that new areas should not be introduced under Community Law.
Samtidig er markedet for audiovisuelle produkter kendetegnet ved at være grænseoverskridende.
For this reason we must object to the statements in points 2 and 12 of the report.
For det andet skal man undgå, at udbydere af krypterede tjenester opnår en så høj grad af retlig beskyttelse, at de får en monopollignende stilling på forskellige delmarkeder.
The use of the principle of subsidiarity to prevent new areas such as culture, the media, energy and research being brought in under Community Law is, we consider, more in line with our politics.
Betænkning af Palacio Vallelersundi (A4­0155/97) de nationale og lokale demokratier ikke vil blive fuldstæn­dig tilsidesat af EU.
Kristoffersen ­ fully democratic, this supervision must therefore be car­ried out outside the Community's sphere and in priority be carried out in national parliaments.
Nærheds­princippet er ikke, som et supplement til artikel 235, et nyt middel, hvormed Fællesskabet kan skaffe sig magt på bekostning af medlemsstaterne.
There is still a great deal to do to ensure that both the letter and the spirit of the Treaty are respected in this area.
Vi mener, at det skal betragtes som et grundlæggende princip, som derfor skal anvendes ofte.
I would therefore point out that this duty does not apply solely to the Commission.
Vi vil gerne understrege, at EU kun skal beskæftige sig med det, som er omfattet af dets kompetenceområde, sådan som de nationale regeringer har bestemt.
All the EU institutions are committed to the principle of subsidiarity, not least the 626 Members of this Parliament.
Nærhedsprincippet skal begrænse EU's muligheder for at underlægge sig nye områder, sådan som det ellers ofte kræves i alle mulige grøn­ og hvidbøger.
I hope that the Commis­sion's three reports will help to ensure that we too here in the European Parliament will take the subsidiarity princi­ple more seriously in future.
Vor grundlæggende holdning er, at Sverige er trådt ind i et mellemstatsligt samarbejde, og at der ikke skal underlæg­ges fællesskabsretten nye områder.
Lindqvist (ELDR), in writing. ­ (SV) The principle of subsidiarity concerns the issues which should be handled at union level and which by Member States.
Derfor bliver vi nødt til at gå imod beslutningsforslagets punkt 2 og 12.
Within the Member States we could be talking about national, re­gional or local level.
At nærhedsprincippet er blevet anvendt til at forhindre, at nye områder, såsom kultur, medier, energi og forskning, er blevet underlagt fællesskabsretten, anser vi nærmest for at være på linje med vor politik.
The objective of the principle of subsidiarity must be, that as many issues as possible should be handled as close to the people as possible.
Medlemssta­terne skal tilstræbe at anvende deres demokratiske instru­menter på alle de områder, hvor EU ikke har beslutnings­kompetencen.
It is quite wrong to call this subterfuge 'taking issues back to national level', as the committee does, or to inove the issue up to a wholly interstate level.
Klarhed er alfa og omega i denne proces.
The very opposite should be the objective of subsidiarity.
Fitzsimons (UPE), skriftlig. ­ (EN) Da Maastricht­traktaten trådte i kraft i efteråret 1992 var én af de væsentligste henstillinger, den omfattede, at subsidiaritets­princippet skulle indarbejdes i de centrale europæiske politikker og programmer.
It is also regrettable that thereport should contain a rather unrealistic interpretation of Article 3B of the Treaty on European Union, presented as defining a superiority in principle of Community action compared with the indi­vidual action of the various Member States in terms of effectiveness (paragraph 2 of the Explanatory Memoran­dum), instead of recommending the modification, so that its application should come under ordinary law, regardless of the type of competences exercised at Community level.
Det betød ganske enkelt, at de lokale myndigheder og lokalsamfundene skulle have et større ord at sige om anvendelsen af europæiske midler i deres områder.
Yet, far from making such recommendations, the Palacio report on the contrary confirms on this score a completely ham­strung, wary position, asking that the wording of Article 3B should not be revised at the Intergovernmental Conference.
Jeg går stærkt ind for denne tanke, for lokalsamfundene kan samordne deres kreative talenter og skabe beskæfti­gelse i deres lokalområder.
Souchet (I­EDN), in writing. ­ (FR) My group did not vote for the Palácio report because of a number of contradictions contained in if. it offers both the best and the worst, as if it had been drafted by two different hands.
Derfor vil jeg gerne minde om, at dette ikke alene er en forpligtelse, som retter sig mod Kommissionen.
The report sets out an excellent analysis of the legal nature of the subsidiarity principle.
Lindqvist (ELDR), skriftlig. ­ (SV) Nærhedsprincippet drejer sig om, hvilke spørgsmål der skal behandles på henholdsvis unionsplan og af medlemsstaterne.
In the same way, the Palacio report highlights the lack of thoroughness shown by the Commission in the various reports on application of the subsidiarity principle.
I med­lemsstaterne kan der være tale om det nationale, det regionale eller det lokale niveau.
The .question of the respect of subsidiarity principles and proportionality ­ found in principles of the European Union ­ is confused with questions of legislative tech­nique in matters of clarity and simplicity of texts.
Nærhedsprincippets for­mål må være, at så mange spørgsmål som muligt behand­les så tæt på borgerne som muligt.
IN THE CHAIR: MRS FONTAINE Vice­President
Det skuffer mig at se, at Generaldirektorat XVI, Europa­Kommissionens regionalpolitiske afdeling, er inde i nogle meget detaljerede overvejelser om at sætte en stopper for Leader­ordningen, når den udløber i 1999.
The rapporteur is also right in denouncing the Commis­sion's propensity to present itself as the exclusive Com­munity legislator..
Det ville være et alvorligt tilbageskridt, et slag i ansigtet på landbrugssamfundene, og det ville være udtryk for, at man forkaster EU's subsidiaritetsprincip, hvor man forsø­ger at få involveret alle samfundslag i gennemførelsen og administrationen af de europæiske politikker.
It is therefore surprising to note that, following such conect analyses, the report makes no recommendations for the adoption of measures which are liable effectively to correct the deviations which it denounces.
Souchet (I­EDN), skriftlig. ­ (FR) Min gruppe har ikke stemt for betænkning af Palacio Vallelersundi på grund af det selvmodstridende indhold; betænkningen indeholder nemlig både det ypperste og det ringeste, som om der havde stået to vidt forskellige personer bag.
President ­ On behalf of Parliament I welcome members of a delegation from the Parliament of the Republic of Georgia, led by Mr Giorgi Kobakhidze, Deputy Speaker of the Parliament and Chairman of the Delegation for relations with the EU.
Den Europæiske Union er stadig for centraliseret, og Unionen skal bringes tættere på borgerne.
This is the fourth meeting between our delegations, the European Parliament's and the Georgian Parliament's, and
Gahrton, Holm, Lindholm og Schörling (V), skriftlig. ­(SV) Nærhedsprincippet er et vigtigt princip i EU.
On the essential question of monitoring subsidiarity, the report is satisfied with the cunent situation even though there have been numerous violations of the principle, pointed out in particular in the contribution presented by Mr Berthu on 2 January 1997 as Vice­Chairman of our Institutional Committee.
Derfor er vi meget skuffede og samtidig forbavsede over, at ordføreren har så negativ en holdning til det.
Neither the self­discipline of the institutions nor the Court of Justice are able to have subsidiarity really respected.
Fra svensk side fremhæves nærhedsprincippet som en garanti for, at
In order to be effective and
Betænkningen indeholder en glimrende juridisk analyse af nærhedsprincippet.
') Topical and urgent debate (list of subjects selected): see Minutes.
Formanden. ­ Hermed er afstemningstiden afsluttet. (') (Mødet udsat kl. 12.40 og genoptaget kl. 15.00)
We attach considerable importance to our relations, with you and, through you, with the Georgian people.
FORSÆDE: Nicole FONTAINE Næstformand
I wish you a warm welcome to the European Parliament and to Strasbourg.
Jeg må sige, at vi lægger stor vægt på de forbindelser, vi har med Deres delegation og herigennem med det georgi­ske folk.
So we need to improve access to justice for ordinary citizens right across the European Union.
Hverken institutionernes selvjustits eller EF­Domstolen er i stand til at sikre den reelle overholdelse af nærhedsprincippet.
We are calling for all environmental legislation to be subject to codecision and qualified majority voting in Council.
For at være effektiv og fuldt demokratisk bør kontrollen derfor foretages af ikke­fællesskabsinstanser og i første række af de nationale parlamenter.
We think this will bolster both democracy and transparency and improve the availability of information.
Men de nationale parlamenter fremstilles i betænkningen i et restriktivt, underordnet og negativt lys, idet man nøjes med at beklage, at disse parlamenter ofte undlader aktivt at påse, at fællesskabsdirektiverne gen­nemføres i national ret.
We want to ensure that the information produced is of better quality and we want Member States to report on actual implementation and enforcement and not just trans position into the law of these Member States.
Formanden. ­ Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænk­ning (A4­0109/97) af Kenneth Collins for Udvalget om Miljø­ og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse om meddelelse fra Kommissionen om gennemførelse af EF's miljølovgivning (KOM(96) 0500 ­ C4­0591/96).
President. - The next item is the report (A4-0109/97) by Mr Ken Collins, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment Public Health and Consumer Protection, on the communication from the Commission concerning the implementation of Community environmental law (COM(96)0500 - C4-0591/96).
Hvis nærheds­princippet er et grundlæggende princip i Unionen er det nemlig helt forkert, at Maastricht­traktaten indskrænker anvendelsesområdet til de delte beføjelser og dermed skaber en særskilt område, nemlig enekompetenceområ­det, hvor nærhedsprincippet ikke gælder.
Inspection and sanctions must be improved and all Member States must have an inspectorate - which is not the case at present - to be policed at European Union level by the Commission in conjunction with the European Environment Agency on the one hand and the IMPEL network on the other.
Kenneth Collins (PSE), ordfører. ­ (EN) Fru formand, det er anden gang i dag, jeg tager ordet for at tale til et utroligt velbesat Parlament.
I wish to say, right at the beginning, that there is a very patchy record of implementation in the Member States.
Det, jeg nu vil tale om, er gennemførelsen og håndhævelsen af den europæiske mil­jølovgivning.
The Parliament has for some years taken a particular interest in how we might improve the record of implementation in view of its importance for the environment as well as for the economic performance of companies in the Member States.
Men langt fra at komme med sådanne anbefalinger, gives der i betænkning af Palacio Vallelersundi tværtimod udtryk for en fastlåst holdning, idet der anmodes om, at man inden for rammerne af regeringskonferencen ikke tager formule­ringen af artikel 3 Β op til fornyet overvejelse.
It is very important and the fact that it does not carry a great many amendments does not mean it is unimportant. There are only two amendments and I propose to accept the one from Mrs Roth-Behrendt Although I have sympathy with the one from Mr Florenz, I do not want to accept it because it unnecessarily restricts the freedom of manoeuvre of individuals and agencies.
Jeg vil lægge ud med straks at sige, at billedet af medlemsstaternes gennemførelse af denne lovgivning er uhyre broget.
The main problems are secrecy in the Council, compromise texts which are sometimes weak and incoherent, and sometimes the fact that environment law is not properly codified.
I henhold til den 13. årlige beretning om avendelsen af Det Europæiske Fællesskabs lov, blev Kom­missionen i 1995 underrettet om 265 overtrædelser af loven, på trods af at der eksisterer mere end 200 lovinstru­menter til beskyttelse af miljøet i Unionen.
With regard to secrecy in the Council it has been suggested to me very recently that no comment from me today would be complete unless I included in this a reference to declarations in the Council. This was dealt with this morning but a comment was made to me very recently indeed that this is of such importance that I should mention it again.
Så problemet er reelt nok.
Having now done so I have kept my word.
Parlamentet har i en række år været specielt årvågent over for muligheder for at øge gennemførelsesni­veauet i lyset af den betydning, dette har for miljøet og for virksomhedernes økonomiske performance i medlemssta­terne.
Gebhardt (PSE), draftsman of the opinion of the Commit tee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights. - (DE) Madam President, if so few amendments have been tabled, Mr Collins, one reason is no doubt that you have produced such a good report that there is hardly anything to add to it.
') Aktuel og uopsættelig debat (foreslåede emner): se protokollen.
We think that in the first place we need greater transparency.
Kenneth Collins nomiske byrder, der begrænser deres muligheder for at arbejde effektivt.
Jackson (PPE). - Madam President we in the EPP Group think that the Collins report is fine as far as it goes, although we have our reservations about paragraph 11, to which we have tabled an amendment and on which we hope Mr Collins will have second thoughts.
Det er en vanvittig situation, som man ikke bør opmuntre medlemsstaterne til at kopiere i fremtiden.
We do not want the conespondence itself but the information, and we also want something actually done in this area.
Hovedproblemerne er fortrolighedsprincippet i Rådet, kompromistekster, som i visse tilfælde er svage og ikke er koordineret godt, og at miljøreglerne i nogle tilfælde ikke har været ordentligt kodificeret.
The implementation of environmental law also requires that the legislation itself should make provision for fund ing.
Med hensyn til fortrolig hedsprincippet i Rådet har man for ganske nylig sagt til mig, at jeg aldeles ikke ville give et dækkende billede af situationen her i dag, hvis jeg ikke benyttede lejligheden til at nævne Rådets erklæringer. Dette aspekt blev behandlet tidligere på dagen, men jeg fik for ganske kort tid siden den besked, at dette forhold er så væsentligt, at jeg bør nævne det igen.
That is why the Committee on Legal Affairs is proposing that the Commission should ensure that its legislative proposals contain provisions which commit the Member States to effective, appropriate and proportionate sanctions in the case of breaches of Community environmental law.
Det har jeg nu gjort, så jeg har holdt mit ord.
This is a second and much-needed element to be addressed.
Betænkningen her fik støtte på kryds og tværs af partierne i udvalget.
Clearly there is a very serious problem here: laws are passed on the environment and then they are widely ignored.
Den har stor betydning, og det, at der ikke er kommet så mange ændringsforslag, betyder ikke, at den er ligegyldig.
Reporting requirements are introduced and they are ignored.
Der er kun to ændringsforslag, og jeg vil støtte det forslag, som fru Roth-Behrendt har stillet.
Mr White apparently complains from his constituency in England, and his complaint is lost or forgotten and he does not hear anything about it.
Skønt jeg mener, at forslaget fra hr. Florenz er positivt, kan jeg ikke støtte det, fordi jeg finder, at det indebærer en unødvendig begrænsning af det enkelte menneskes og agenturernes manøvrefrihed.
No one in Brussels can really say that they know how or whether the law is being enforced, even in crucial sectors of environmental policy such as hazardous waste manage ment where to date the European Commission has re ceived reports from only six of the fifteen Member States.
Gebhardt (PSE), ordfører for udtalelsen fra Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder. - (DE) Fru formand, hr. Collins, når der er indgivet så få ændringsforslag, skyldes det vel også, at De har udarbejdet en særdeles god betænkning, og der derfor næppe er noget at tilføje, og det, som vi har foreslået i Retsudvalget, har De jo også overtaget i Deres betænkning, således at vi ikke havde nogen problemer med det.
In fact you could say, in the presence of the Georgian delegation, that we are - sadly - not a terribly good example of how to apply European environmental legislation. tion.
Et enkelt direktiv kan nødvendiggøre, at der skal vedtages adskillige love på nationalt og regionalt plan.
Finally, as the rapporteur himself has mentioned, there is the matter of the Environment Agency.
Og jo mere kompleks en sag bliver, jo mere sandsynligt er det, at der kan opstå et røgslør, så man undviger det centrale spørgsmål om håndhævelsen.
Cooperation be tween the Commission and the Environment Agency must be strengthened, because the Agency is best placed to have the information needed for legislative purposes.
Vi er nødt til at finde ud af, hvor problemerne ligger, og det er Kommissionens pligt at sørge for at overvåge håndhævelsen.
Such information is very useful indeed, and can be of consider able assistance to the Commission.
I nogle tilfælde er medlemsstaterne ikke klare over, hvordan landet ligger, og i visse situationer er man tilbøjelig til at tro, at de måske ikke ønsker, at alle skal have mulighed for at konstatere, hvor langt de selv er kommet med tingene. Så det kan ikke nægtes, at vi har et problem.
I hope that when the Environmental Com missioner replies, she may be able to give us some up-to-the-minute news on what is happening to the actions which the Commission apparently announced in January under Article 171 against a number of Member States which have successively ignored European Court of Justice judgments since 1990.
De sagde, at der er meget store problemer med gennemførelsen og anvendelsen af miljølovgivningen i Den Euro pæiske Union.
White (PSE). - Madam President, I am a citizen of the European Union as well as a Member of this European Parliament.
Derfor er det nødvendigt at få instrumenter, for at vi også rent faktisk kan komme videre, og blandt disse instrumenter hører også de, der i første række bidrager til gennemskuelighed.
I would like to summarize the rules that the ordinary citizen - such as myself - can follow if he or she wants to make a complaint to the Commission.
Ordføreren understregede det også allerede.
So I agree with the Collins' recommendations on the whole.
Derfor har Retsudvalget f.eks. foreslået foranstaltninger til at forbedre gennemskueligheden, såsom gennemførelsesoversigter, mere intensive konsultationer, klarhed i forbindelse med formulering af lovgivning osv. Det er af særdeles stor betydning på dette område.
It is particularly interesting that Mr Collins has proposed that we should try to bring into play a sort of inspectorate of the inspectors - a small force that might be able to go around examining whether Member States are in fact putting the law into action themselves.
Med den strategi, vi foreslår, ønsker vi at prøve at spille på en hel række strenge.
It is quite simple. If you have a complaint you can obtain a form from a Commission office - in my case from London.
Vi mener, at vi i første omgang har brug for mere gennemskuelighed.
The form states that you can make a complaint 'subject to the rules of confidentiality'.
Borgerne er berettigede til at vide, hvilke love der vedtages, og de har ret til at tro på, at alle relevante love bliver ordentligt håndhævet.
Well, it is a bad custom and a bad practice if it means that the citizen is not able to be kept informed on an open basis rather than on a secret one.
Så vi har et behov for at forbedre den almindelige borgers adgang til at gå rettens vej i hele Den Europæiske Union.
We cannot continue to go on relying on individual complaints, such as those that have been mentioned, on inspection or on self-inspection - by which I mean the reporting requirement My three points are as follows.
Vi vil opfordre til, at enhver form for miljølovgivning bliver behandlet efter medbestemmelsesproceduren og afgjort ved kvalificeret flertal i Rådet.
First, on cost: one of the great deficiencies of the Commission's approach to environmental legislation is that it seems prepared to ignore the cost of legislation.
Vi mener, at dette vil gavne såvel demokratiet som gennemskueligheden, og at det vil sikre, at det bliver lettere at skaffe sig ordentlige informationer.
The real trouble is: will a cost-impact statement work?
Vi ønsker at højne kvalitetsniveauet for de informationer, der bliver lagt frem, og vi ønsker, at medlemsstaterne skal indgive indberetninger om den faktiske gennemførelse og håndhævelse, og ikke blot omsætte det til lovgivningen i disse medlemsstater.
It does not have to apply to all legislation but we in the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection have seen that when a cost-impact statement is put together it is either extremely difficult for the Commission to take action on it or it is completely worthless, as in the case of the impact statement on the bathing waters directive.
Korrespondancen mellem Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne skal i videst muligt omfang gøres offentiigt tilgængelig.
Sadly, when I, as a citizen, made a complaint about the state of affairs in the Severn Estuary on which my constituency abuts, I received no satisfactory information about the progress of that complaint.
Det er egentlig et af de centrale spørgsmål, vi skal tage fat på.
Even now I do not know whether the file is open or closed.
Det er klart, at ikke al korrespondance kan offentliggøres, men Europa-Parlamentet skal i det mindste vide, når artikel 169 anvendes.
I do not know what has passed in the way of conespondence between the previous government of my country and the Commission.
Det skal have at vide, at denne artikel anvendes, hvornår og i hvilken form.
And that is wrong because I have to report back to my constituents.
Vi ønsker ikke den egentlige korrespondance, men oplysnin gerne, og vi ønsker, at der også rent faktisk gøres noget på dette område.
I am not able to do so, because even though I deleted the reference to confidentiality in my individual complaint, the details about the progress of that complaint have not been given to me.