natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I betragtning af hvor presserende og aktuelt et emne der er tale om, er jeg sikker på, at det i hvert fald er én måde, hvorpå vi kunne klare dette problem; der blev nemlig først opnået enighed om erklæringen fra det sociale topmøde i
I am sure because this is so urgent and so topical, that would be one way in which we could get around the fact that the declaration from the social summit in Copenhagen was only agreed at 2 o'clock in the morning, so that clearly we were up against a very tight deadline.
Green (PSE). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg erindrer om sidste måneds drøftelse af dette spørgsmål; vi blev dengang enige om, at det ville være formålstjenligt, om Parlamentet afventede udfaldet af den offentlige høring, som en række parlamentsudvalg under ledelse af Udvalget om Forskning, Teknologisk Udvikling og Energi i fællesskab skulle afholde.
Green (PSE). — Mr President, you will remember the discussion we had last month on this issue; it was agreed then that it would be advisable for Parliament to wait for the outcome of the public hearing which was to be held jointly by several committees of this House, led by the Committee on Research, Technological Development and Energy.
Den har nu fundet sted, og jeg synes, det er passende, at vi nu i det mindste får mulighed for at sætte vore konklusioner på debatten på
That has since taken place and I think it is appropriate that we should now at least be able to put in writing our conclusions as a result ofthat discussion.
København kl. 2 om morgenen, hvilket er ensbetydende med, at vi har haft en meget stram tidsfrist.
President week, we will then put this item onto the agenda.
I stedet for at bruge yderligere tid her i salen, burde vi tage punktet af dagsordenen for fredag.
I will let you know tomorrow morning at the start of the sitting.
Måske kunne vi opfordre Kommissionen til at anmode om at måtte give Parlamentet en redegørelse.
but also on the future industrial policy of the European Community.
Oomen-Ruijten (PPE). - (NL) Hr. formand, PPE-Gruppen tilslutter sig gerne helhjertet denne anmodning til Kommissionen. sionen.
From this point of view, I would recommend leaving this item on the agenda.
Formanden. — Vi får problemer med onsdag eftermiddag, kære kolleger.
Green (PSE). — Mr President, I am speaking in favour of taking this off the agenda.
von Wogau (PPE), formand for Udvalget om Økonomi, Valutaspørgsmål og Industripolitik. — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg vil ganske vist gerne erklære mig delvis enig med min kollega, hr. Donnelly, i hans begrundelse, men jeg må gøre opmærksom på, at Kommissionen i fredags i Forskningsrådet fremlagde forslag, der kunne være af stor interesse for Europa-Parlamentet, eftersom de drejer sig om den fremtidige forsknings- og industripolitik inden for Det Europæiske Fælleskab. Vi forlanger igen og igen, at Kommissionen skal afgive redegørelser for Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet på samme tid.
Elles (PPE). — Mr President, you should have in front of you a request from our group that Parliament bring forward the debates on the budgetary guidelines, because as they are placed on the agenda at moment, we will be voting them not on Thursday, but on Friday.
Ud fra denne synsvinkel vil jeg derfor foreslå, at dette punkt forbliver på dagsordenen.
We in this House always wish to have as many colleagues as possible voting on budgetary matters, as you know full well, Mr President.
Green (PSE). — (EN) Hr. formand Jeg er tilhænger af, at dette punkt tages af dagsordenen.
I do not want to repeat the point on the G7 meeting made by Mr Donnelly but I do want to pick up the issue of industrial policy which Mr von Wogau also raised and used as the reason for keeping this on the agenda.
Som De udmærket er klar over, hr. formand, ser vi altid gerne her i Parlamentet, at så mange medlemmer som muligt deltager i afstemningerne om budgetspørgsmål.
It therefore seems particularly inappropriate that we should have a statement just three weeks before a major report on this topic is due to come before the House.
Hvis Parlamentet fremrykkede disse to punkter — hr. Mirandas og min egen betænkning om budgetpolitikken — til et lidt tidligere tidspunkt på torsdag, ville vi kunne stemme kl. 12.
Were it to be possible for this House to move forward these two items — Mr Miranda and myself on budgetary guidelines — to a bit earlier on Thursday, that would allow us to vote at midday.
Det er en anmodning, som jeg beder om at få sat under afstemning.
That is a request I would like the House to vote on.
Formanden. — Jeg sætter nu anmodningen fra De Europæiske Socialdemokraters Gruppe om, at redegørelsen fra Kommissionen om G7-mødet tages af dagsordenen, under afstemning.
President. — We will now vote on the request of the Group of the Party of European Socialists to remove the Commission statement on the G7 meeting from the agenda.
Som De ved, modtog jeg den først et par minutter før kl. 17.00, og i følge forretningsordenen skal anmodninger om ændring af dagsordenen foreligge en time før.
As you yourself know, I only received it one or two minutes before 5 p.m., and the Rules of Procedure state that requests to amend the agenda must be in an hour before.
Hvis jeg giver efter, går det helt galt.
If I let things get out of hand in this way, we shall not be able to conduct our business properly.
Jeg kan derfor ikke godkende Deres anmodning.
I cannot therefore accept your request.
Formanden. — De Europæiske Socialdemokraters Gruppe anmoder om, at Kommissionens redegørelse om G7-mødet bliver taget af dagsordenen.
President. — The Group of the Party of European Socialists requests that the Commission make a statement followed by questions on the bilateral agreements between some Member States and the United States of America on the 'open skies' policy.
Jeg giver ordet til hr. Donnelly, som vil begrunde anmodningen.
I have to inform you that the Commissioner responsible, Mr Kinnock, cannot be present on Friday.
Formanden. — De Europæiske Socialdemokraters Gruppe anmoder om, at Kommissionen afgiver en redegørelse, efter fulgt af spørgsmål, om de bilaterale aftaler mellem en række medlemsstater og De Forenede Stater om »Open Sky«politikken.
President. — The Group of the Party of European Socialists has asked that the Commission statement on the G7 meeting be taken off the agenda. I call on Mr Donnelly to speak in support of the request.
Jeg må gøre opmærksom på, at kommissær Kinnock, der har dette som sit sagsområde, ikke kan være til stede på fredag.
Donnelly, Alan (PSE). — Mr President, it is in any case rather strange that we should be asking for a statement on this issue, because we had a full debate on this matter in the last plenary part-session.
Simpson (PSE). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er klar over, at hr. Kinnock får svært ved at komme her på fredag, men dette emne er så vigtigt, at min gruppe mener, vi bør drøfte det i denne uge, om ikke for andet, så fordi det netop er, hvad Rådet skal gøre i denne uge.
Simpson (PSE). — Mr President, I am aware that Mr Kinnock would have difficulty in coming here on Friday but such is the importance of this particular subject that my group feels that we should be discussing it this week, if only because that indeed is what the Council will be doing this week.
I løbet af det sidste par måneder er der sket det, at nogle af medlemsstaterne, i første omgang Nederlandene, men nu også Belgien og Østrig, er gået deres egne veje og har indgået bilaterale arrangementer med USA om civil luftfart; det giver anledning til bekymring for Den Europæiske Unions politik med hensyn til forbindelserne med USA inden for civil luftfart.
What has happened over the past few months is that Member States have gone off on their own entering into bilateral arrangements in civil aviation with the United States: first of all, Holland and now Belgium and Austria, and this is giving some cause for concern with regard to European Union policy on civil aviation relations with the United States.
Når nu Rådet skal drøfte spørgsmålet, ville det efter min mening kun være passende, om Kommissionen dels gav
So bearing in mind that the Council will be discussing the subject, I think it is only appropriate that we should get a statement from the Commission — even though it will not be from the Commissioner directly responsible — setting out their particular view on this and a report back from the Council meeting that is being held this week.
Alan Donnelly (PSE). — (EN) Hr. formand, det er under alle omstændigheder ret underligt, at Parlamentet har anmodet om en redegørelse om dette emne, eftersom vi havde en grundig forhandling om det i plenarforsamlingen under sidste mødeperiode.
Cornelissen (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, I appreciate Mr Simpson's concern, but I would point out that we held a debate on aviation policy at the last part-session, on Mr Salafranca's report, at which this point was raised.
Vi kommer til at drøfte konklusionerne på G7-mødet om informationssamfundet i forbindelse med sidste del af hr. Hermans betænkning, som skal behandles inden for de næste par uger.
I would also point out that we have a meeting of the Committee on Transport and Tourism next week which will, at my express request, be attended by Mr Kinnock, the Commissioner primarily responsible for these matters, and he will of course be covering the subject.
Desuden stiller både kommissær Bangemann og kommissær Cresson sig til rådighed onsdag eftermiddag for at give Parlamentets medlemmer mulighed for at udveksle synspunkter med dem om konklusionerne på G7-mødet og den arbejdsgruppe, som Kommissionen har nedsat for at følge nogle af disse konklusioner op.
(Parliament rejected the request) von Wogau (PPE), chairman of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy. — (DE) Mr President, I would agree to some extent with Mr Donnelly's comments on the request but at the same time point out that, on Friday, the Commission put proposals to the Council of Research Ministers which would be of great interest to Parliament, because they affect the future policy on research and industry of the European Community. We are constantly asking the Commission to make statements simultaneously to Parliament and the Council.
Formanden. — Hr. Elliott, Formandskonferencen har enstemmigt besluttet, at der tirsdag, onsdag og torsdag formiddag, hvor der finder vigtige forhandlinger og afstemninger sted her i plenarsalen, ikke må finde andre møder sted i Parlamentets forskellige organer.
President. — Mr Elliott, the Conference of Presidents decided unanimously that on Tuesday morning, Wednesday morning and Thursday morning, when important debates and votes are taking place here, additional meetings of Parliament's groups and committees should not be held.
Under alle omstændigheder vil der ikke være nogen tolkning til rådighed.
Certainly, the interpreting facilities required for them will not be provided.
Det er for øvrigt en beslutning, der ikke er truffet over hals og hoved, men som er blevet drøftet i flere uger.
Moreover, that is not a decision which came out of the blue, but one that had been under discussion for several weeks.
Medina Ortega (PSE). - (ES) Hr. formand, det er blevet besluttet, at Kommissionen på onsdag kl. 13.00 afgiver en redegørelse efterfulgt af forhandling om, hvad De betegnede som »fiskeriet«.
Medina Ortega (PSE). — (ES) Mr President, we agreed that there would be a statement by the Commission, followed by a debate, at 1 p.m. on Wednesday, on a subject which you described as a 'fisheries' issue.
Jeg anmoder formandskabet om at ændre denne betegnelse, da det ikke drejer sig om fiskeri, men om et overgreb fra den canadiske flådes side mod en EF-fiskerbåd, et overgreb, som kommissær Bonino har givet betegnelsen sørøveri.
I would like to ask the presidency to correct the description of the subject, as it is not a question of fisheries but rather of the attack by the Canadian navy on a Community fishing vessel.
Der er således ikke tale om et fiskerispørgsmål, men om et overgreb fra den canadiske flådes side på et EF-fiskerfartøj i internationalt farvand 220 sømil fra den canadiske kyst.
It has been described as an act of piracy by Commissioner Bonino, so it is not a question of fisheries, but one of an attack by a Canadian navy unit on a Community vessel in international waters 220 miles off the Canadian coast.
Fabre-Aubrespy (EDN). — (FR) Hr. formand, mit indlæg til forretningsordenen er baseret på forretningsordenens artikel 24, 153 og 155.
Fabre-Aubrespy (EDN). — (FR) Mr President, my point of order is based on rules 24, 153 and 155.
Siden vor sidste mødeperiode har den tolvte konference af de nationale parlamentsinstanser, der er ansvar lige for fællesskabsspørgsmål, fundet sted i Paris den 27. og 28. februar med deltagelse af repræsentanter fra de nationale parlamenter. Europa-Parlamentet var repræsenteret med seks medlemmer; tre fra Den Socialistiske Gruppe og tre fra PPE-gruppen.
Since we last met, the twelfth Conference of Organizations Specializing in Community affairs has been held in Paris, on 27 and 28 February. This brought together representatives ol the national parliaments.
I den anledning vil jeg gerne stille formanden tre spørgsmål.
I have three questions on this, Mr President.
Formanden. — Hr. Medina Ortega, jeg beder Dem undskylde det forkerte ordvalg.
President. — Please excuse me for my wrong choice of words, Mr Medina Ortega.
De har naturligvis ret!
You are right, of course!
For det første: Hvordan er disse medlemmer blevet udpeget? Hvilket mandat har Parlamentet givet dem, så de kunne udtale sig på dets vegne?
First question: how were these Members nominated?
Har Parlamentet underrettet plenarmødet om denne udpegelse?
Why were none of the seven other groups in Parliament represented?
Puerta (GUE/NGL). - (ES) Hr. formand, i forlængelse af hr. Medinas indlæg vil jeg gerne have ført til protokols, at Parlamentet komplimenterer Den Europæiske Union for den resolutte holdning, den har indtaget i denne sag.
Puerta (GUE/NGL). - (ES) Mr President, following on from Mr Medina's remarks, I would like Parliament to record its congratulations on the firm stance being taken by the European Union.
Den Europæiske Venstrefløjs Fællesgruppe finder, at også Parlamentet bør indtage en fast, men naturligvis dialogorienteret, holdning, og jeg anmoder derfor Parlamentets formand om at sørge for, at mødet i Delegationen for Forbindelserne med Canada, som er planlagt til næste uge, bliver aflyst, eller i det mindste suspenderet, indtil dette problem er løst.
We believe, and I speak on behalf of the Confederal Group of the European United Left, that Parliament should also adopt a firm position, but remain willing to engage in dialogue. As there is a meeting with the Canadian delegation planned for next week, Mr President, I would ask that you contact the delegation and that Parliament endorse the cancellation or postponement of the meeting with Canada until the international problem between Canada and the European Union has been resolved.
For det andet: Hvis Formandskonferencen har haft mulighed for at udtale sig om dette forhold, hvilke kriterier ligger da til grund for valget?
I must say tell you I think that is wrong. We have just put the Commission statement regarding the incident on the agenda for Wednesday at 3 p.m.
Har den med dette valg sikret, at medlemsstaterne og de politiske retninger er ligeligt repræsenteret, således som det hedder i artikel 153, stk. 2?
You will have an opportunity then to debate the matter, including Mr Puerta's request. That can of course be discussed in plenary sitting.
Hvorfor var ingen af de øvrige syv grupper i Parlamentet repræsenteret?
That is not a question we should settle during adoption of the order of business. (')
For det tredje: Kan De forpligte Dem til at sikre, at Parlamentets grupper ved den trettende COSAC-konference, der finder sted i Madrid, som et minimum bliver forholdsmæssigt repræsenteret, under hensyntagen til de særdeles vigtige emner, der skal drøftes på denne konference?
President — Mr Fabre-Aubrespy, Parliament's delegation to COSAC is made up as follows: we have two Vice-Presidents, who are expressly mandated by the Bureau to represent the European Parliament in COSAC. They are Mrs Fontaine and Mr Imbeni.
Det vil sige, at man ikke tillader, at kun to ud af ni parlamentsgrupper får mulighed for at udtale sig i denne slags organer.
The delegation also automatically includes the chairman of the Committee on Institutional Affairs.
Formanden. — Mine damer og herrer, kære kolleger, De forsøger at gennemføre debatten om hændelsen i internationalt farvand nu i stedet for efter Kommissionens redegørelse.
The Bureau decides on a case-by-case basis, in the light of the agenda of the COSAC meeting, what experts should be sent from the European Parliament to address specific items on that agenda.
Jeg må sige, at jeg finder det forkert.
All that matters is that the position of the European Parliament should be represented as it has been decided.
Vi har netop sat redegørelsen fra Kommissionen om hændelsen på dagsordenen for onsdag kl. 15.00.
Elliott (PSE). — Mr President, on a point of order, I wonder if you could make a statement clarifying the position in relation to what some of us learned only a matter of a week or ten days ago, namely, that it has been decided that other meetings should not take place when the plenary is sitting.
De vil til den tid få lejlighed til at udtale Dem herom og om hr. Puertas forslag.
Initially I heard that this was to be at any time when the plenary was sitting, but now I understand it to be on three mornings of the plenary week.
Det kan naturligvis drøftes i plenum.
I gather that the reason for that is perhaps to get a better attendance at key debates in this Chamber.
Men spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt noget skal udsættes eller ej, bør vi behandle i Formandskonferencen på torsdag.
I am not sure that will be the result, but in any event I think it is regrettable that decision was made without prior warning so that all those various meetings that are due to take place e.g. political and working groups, inter-groups, etc., have been thrown into chaos.
Det er ikke et spørgsmål, der bør afgøres under fastsættelsen af dagsordenen. (')
I hope you can clarify the position and that it will be recognized that whilst there may sometimes be too many meetings going on at inappropriate times, many of them are very valuable and are much appreciated by the Members who attend them.
Uopsættelighedsprocedure — Aktuel og uopsættelig debat (foreslåede emner) — Taletid: se protokollen.
Sandbæk (EDN). — (DA) Mr President, I cannot understand it when you say there is a unanimous grouping of chairmen who have stated that we cannot have any meetings on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday of this week.
Formanden. — Hr. Fabre-Aubrespy, Europa-Parlamentets delegation til COSAC bliver sammensat på følgende måde: Vi har to næstformænd, som Præsidiet udtrykkeligt har pålagt at repræsentere Europa-Parlamentet i COSAC.
This Wednesday the Europe of Nations Group has invited a number of foreign guests to meet the two representatives of the reflection group on Wednesday morning, and this means that we will not be able to get any interpreting provided.
Det er fru Fontaine og hr. Imbeni, og desuden er formanden for Udvalget om Institutionelle Spørgsmål født medlem af denne delegation.
It will be quite absurd, of course, if the two members who are appointed to the reflection group, and who have kindly made themselves available for this conference, and all our foreign guests, are faced with a situation where they cannot get any interpreting provided.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
It should apply as from the next meeting.
Ændring af forretningsordenens artikel 159
Seek advice in that context.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (A4-0024/95) af Fayot for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet om ændring af forretningsordenens artikel 159 om udnævnelse af ombudsmanden. manden.
Fabre-Aubrespy (EDN). — (FR) I am grateful to you, Mr President, but the fact is that what you have said is not correct.
Præsidiet afgør fra sag til sag og i forhold til de spørgsmål, der er på dagsordenen for COSAC-mødet, hvilke eksperter fra Europa-Parlamentet, der skal deltage i bestemte punkter på dagsordenen.
Rule 153 of the Rules of Procedure defines the composition of interparliamentary delegations.
Jeg har ikke planer om, og forretningsordenen åbner heller ikke mulighed for, at indføre en repræsentation i forhold til gruppernes eller medlemsstaternes størrelse.
So it is this article and the following articles that apply to the COSAC and Rule 153 paragraph 2 clearly states that the Conference of Presidents shall submit to Parliament proposals designed to ensure — as far as possible — fair representation of Member States and of political views.
Det drejer sig om at repræsentere sagen og Europa-Parlamentets holdning, således som vi har besluttet den.
So if a different practice has been followed up to now, Mr President, it needs to be changed.
Fayot (PSE), ordfører. — (FR) Hr. formand, indførelsen af en ombudsmand i artikel 138 E i Maastricht-Traktaten kan betragtes som et af de fremskridt for demokratiet, som denne Traktat medfører.
The President of the European Parliament then referred the matter to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure.
Ombudsmanden skal fungere som mellem led mellem borgerne og administrationen og Fællesskabets institutioner.
On 29 November 1994 it proposed an amendment to the Rules allowing the plenary to decide between the two candidates.
Han skal arbejde tæt sammen med Udvalget for Andragender.
This amendment was rejected by the Plenary on 14 December 1994, by reference back to the committee of the relevant report.
Jeg vil gerne erindre om, at ombudsmandens status findes fastlagt i en beslutning truffet af Europa parlamentet den 9. marts 1994.1 henhold til denne status skal ombudsmanden være anerkendt af alle, uafhængig, hævet over partipolitik og have et tilbundsgående kendskab til Fællesskabets og institutionernes funktion.
After consulting the Conference of Presidents, the President of the European Parliament then closed the first procedure. Possible doubts with regard' to this closure were dispelled when the Committee on the Rules of Procedure took expert legal opinion which was presented by the legal expert himself at the meeting of 21 February 1995 of the Committee on the Rules.
Da der er tale om en ny funktion, er det meget vigtigt, hvem der første gang bliver valgt til at udfylde den.
This opinion vindicated the European Parliament's action, but nevertheless pointed out that all the candidates must be individually informed of the decision, which had in fact been done before receiving the expert opinion, and that the closure of the procedure in no way prejudiced their right to be possible candidates in the fresh call for nominations.
Sandbæk (EDN). — Hr. formand, jeg kan ikke forstå, når De siger, at det er en enig formandsgruppe, som har sagt, at vi tirsdag, onsdag og torsdag i denne uge ikke kan have nogen møder.
President — Mr Fabre-Aubrespy, you are under the misapprehension that this delegation of the European Parliament to COSAC is an interparliamentary delegation.
Nationernes Europa har denne onsdag inviteret flere udenlandske gæster til at møde de to repræsentanter i reflektionsgruppen onsdag formiddag, og det vil sige, at vi ikke kan få nogen tolkning.
The Conference of Presidents has decided the principles governing the composition of this delegation to COSAC.
Det ville jo være fuldstændig absurd, hvis de to medlemmer, der er udpeget til reflektionsgruppen, og som velvilligt har stillet sig til rådighed for denne konference, og alle vores udenlandske gæster stilles over for den situation, at de ikke kan få tolkning.
I refer you to Rule 24 (3), which says: 'The Conference of Presidents shall be the authority responsible for matters relating to relations with other institutions and bodies of the European Union and with the national parliaments of Member States.'
Man kan dog ikke pludselig med ganske få dages varsel tage en sådan beslutning.
It is in that context that the Conference of Presidents determined the criteria for its operation and it is in the light of those criteria that the President acted when he appointed the members of the delegation.