natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I to og et halvt år har vi diskuteret tilpasningen af de europæiske direktiver angående offentlige ordrer til den seneste WTO­overenskomst, og vi er nu kommet til en regulering ved konsensus her ved afslutningen på forligsproceduren.
We have been deliberating for two-and-a-half years now about adapting the European directives on public procurement to the last WTO agreement, and we have now reached a concerted agreement at the end of the conciliation process.
Jeg vil gerne takke alle, som har medvirket hertil, især min kollega Tappin, som har ledsaget denne procedure meget konstruktivt og været med til at afgøre den.
I would like to thank everyone involved, especially my colleague Mr Tappin, who assisted and advised in this process in a most constructive manner.
Derfor vil jeg i aften kun nævne de væsentlige ting.
Hence, this evening I would like to mention only the esssentials.
Vi kunne have afgjort alt dette meget hurtigere, hr. kommissær, hvis Kommissionen respektive en del af Kommissionen havde været noget mere fleksibel, for Parlamentet mente fra starten, at tilpasningen af direktiverne til Verdenshandels­overenskomsten kun skal gå så vidt, som det er absolut nødvendigt.
We could have had everything a lot quicker, Mr Commissioner, if the Commission, or part of the Commission, had been somewhat more flexible, for Parliament was of the opinion from the start- that adapting the directives to the world trade agreement should only proceed as far as is absolutely necessary.
Hr. Wolf, jeg byder Dem velkommen i lejren hos de absolutte forkæmpere for det indre marked.
Mr Wolf, I welcome you into the camp of the firm advocates of the single market.
De har ikke været dér så tit.
You are not often in attendance here.
Ja, han har ikke været der så tit, men det er jo godt, når han er der.
No, he does not often attend, but it is great when he does.
Der vil altid være større jubel over en angrende synder end en tro troende.
There is always more joy over one repentant sinner than a true believer.
Men det er jo netop problemet, at vi i endnu større udstrækning ville anvende det indre marked, hvis vi havde et sådant, som et instrument mod de søvnige postforvaltninger.
Only, this is the problem, that we would use the single market - if we had one - even more as an instrument against sluggish postal administrations.
For det er fuldstændig klart, f.eks. røg det nederlandske postvæsen ud af REIMS II.
Because it is perfectly clear that the Dutch postal service, for instance, has pulled out of Reims II.
Ganske enkelt fordi det er konkurrencedygtigt.
Quite simply because it is competitive.
Remailing foregår jo primært via Holland.
Remailing takes place in the main via Holland.
I henhold til det indre markeds regler kan det for resten ikke forbydes.
Moreover, it cannot be prohibited under single market rules.
Det vil jeg også sige her.
I would like to state this here and now.
For i henhold til det indre markeds regler kan jeg ikke fore­skrive for nogen virksomhed, hvor den skal slå sig ned, og hvilke aktiviteter den skal varetage i og uden for sit land.
Because under single market rules I cannot dictate to any company where it should be domiciled and what activities it should pursue either inside or outside its native country.
Det går ikke!
That is not on!
Hvis vi vil anvende det indre markeds regler, pur et nature, så opnår vi en, om man vil, efterfølgende konkurrencebekendelse, hvilket dog ikke gavner os, fordi vi takket være Deres beslutning, fru Schmidbauer, er i en situation, hvor monopoltjenesterne i alt for lang tid har sørget for, at mange mennesker ikke vil stille sig til disposition for konkurrencen.
If we wish to apply single market rules,, pure and simple, then we arrive at a belated belief in competition, if you like, which is of no use to us because, thanks to your decision, Mrs Schmidbauer, we are in a situation in which the reserved services still ensure that many people are not surrendering to competition.
Vi ønskede en revidering af nogle vigtige punkter, hvorfor det første udkast ­ hvilket vist var temmelig enestående i Parlamentets historie ­ blev fuldstændig nedstemt med kun én stemme imod, fordi Kommissionen også ville regulere ting, som ikke er indeholdt i Verdenshandels­overenskomsten.
We want a key-stage review as to why the first draft -which is probably quite unique in the history of Parliament - was rejected in full with only one vote against, since the Commission wanted to regulate things which are not contained in the world trade agreement.
Det var grunden til forsinkelsen, til den lange forhandlingstid, og til sidst fremlagde Kommissio­nen så et nyt forslag.
This was the reason for the delay, for the long consultation period, and in the end the Commission had to submit a new proposal.
Det var godt nok ikke fuldstændig nyt, men revideret på væsentlige punkter, sådan som Parlamentet havde foreslået.
This might not have been completely new, but was revised with respect to the crucial elements, just as Parliament had suggested.
Nu forsøger Kommissionen hændervridende at få det bedste ud af situationen.
Now the Commission is wringing its hands in trying to make the best out of this situation.
Derfor har vi sagt til folk: Giv os nogle forslag, og det er nu blevet til REIMS II.
That is why we have said to people 'Suggest something to us!' and that is Reims II.
Vi behandler det for øjeblikket.
We are reviewing it now.
Hvis det ikke fungerer, så må man jo overlade det til medlemslandene.
If it does not work, then it will have to be left to the Member States.
For i den forbindelse har Kommissionen nu nået enden på sine muligheder.
For here, too, the Commission has run out of options.
Monopoltjenesterne tillader ikke længere, at vi griber ind, medmindre det er i konkurrencekontroløje­med. Og det kan nogle gange være meget smertefuldt.
The reserved services no longer allow us to intervene, unless it is in terms of controlling competition. And that can sometimes be very painful.
Vi er nu i en sådan situation.
We are in this situation now.
Nuvel, som sagt: Kommissio­nen vil under ingen omstændigheder gå til modangreb og
As I said, though, the Commission is not keen to turn the tables and say: why have you decided everything this way?
Vores ønske var hovedsageligt at få etableret en politik vedrørende tilbudsgivning til fordel for de mennesker, vi repræsenterer.
Our desire was primarily to establish good public procurement policy for the benefit of the people we represent.
Som med alle kompromiser er det ikke sikkert, at det endelige resultat er fuldstændig, som vi -som enkeltpersoner - eller vi - som udvalg - ville have ønsket, men der er ingen grund til at ærgre sig over resultatet.
Although, as with all compromise, the final result may not be exactly what we, as individuals, or we, as a committee, may have wished for, it is fair to say no one will regret the result.
Denne løsning muliggør teknisk krævende og fremtidsorienterede samlede tilbud, som muligvis kun enkelte virksomheder, f.eks. på trafik- eller energiområdet, kan til byde, og derfor kan vi alt i alt være tilfredse.
This solution makes technologically sophisticated and forward-looking general tenders possible, which perhaps only individual firms, say in the transport or energy sector, could provide, and so we*can be satisfied about things by and large.
Kommissionen har i sidste ende taget højde for dette krav.
The Commission has taken this demand into account in the final analysis.
Til slut havde vi kun en kontrovers mellem Parlamentet, Kommissionen og Rådet, og spørgsmålet var, hvorvidt kravene i det såkaldte forsyningsdirektiv for private og offentlige ordregivere gælder tilsvarende.
Ultimately we only had one argument between Parliament, Commission and Council, and that was the question of how far the demands of the socalled sector directive for both private and public contractors apply.
Vi har behandlet spørgsmål i denne betænkning, som ligger til grund for selve politikken vedrørende tilbudsgivning: For det første den vigtige skelnen mellem offentlige og private sektorer.
In this report we have addressed the issues at the very heart of procurement policy: firstly, the distinction be tween public and private sectors; secondly, questions of technical dialogue, to which Mr Langen has referred; thirdly, the provision of information; and, finally and fourthly, the matter of confidentiality.
For det andet spørgsmål om teknisk dialog, hvortil hr. Langen har henvist, og for det tredje formidling af oplysninger, og for det fjerde spørgsmålet om fortrolighed.
Now the issue has been the subject of lengthy controversial debates at all levels of European decision-making, and in the end Parliament has given its approval with the rèsuît that we will be able to reach an agreement in conciliation on two additional statements, which Commissioner Bangemann will no doubt explain to us in a moment.
Disse spørgsmål vil dukke op igen i nærmeste fremtid.
These issues will be coming up before us again in the near future.
Først og fremmest når forsyningsdirektivet 93/38 underka stes en gennemgang næste år, men også når vi modtager Kommissionens svar på grønbogen, når denne skal drøftes i Parlamentet tidligt i 1998.
Firstly, when the Utilities Directive 93/38 comes up for review next year but also when we receive the Commission's response to the Green Paper when that comes before Parliament early in 1998.
Jeg håber, at vi i Parlamentet kan fortsætte vores samarbejde lige så effektivt, som vi har gjort i forbindelse med Langen-betænkningen, og at vi kan opnå en lige så god konlusion.
I hope that we in Parliament will continue to work together as effectively as we have done in the case of the Langen report and that we will be successful in getting as good a conclusion.
Jeg håber også, at Kommissionen og Rådet fortsat vil tage Parlamentets holdning til tilbudsgivning alvorligt, især når vi ikke er til stede til at give vores holdning til kende.
I hope too that the Commission and the Council will continue to take Parliament's feelings on procurement very seriously, especially when we are not there to make the case ourselves.
Her sigter jeg især til forhandlinger på PBEG- og WTO-niveau.
In this case I refer especially to negotiations at the GPA and WTO levels.
Af de fem henstillinger fra Parlamentet er to blevet vedtaget, for det første ændringen med hensyn til de små og mellemstore virksomheder, et af min kollega Tappins anliggender, vedrørende uddannelses- og informationsmateriale, og den anden ændring, som tillader den tekniske dialog, såfremt konkurrence ikke udelukkes.
Of the five recommendations made by Parliament, two have been accepted: one, the amendment affecting small and mediumsized enterprises, a project of Mr Tappin's, with regard to training and information material, and the other, the amendment providing the technological dia logue if competition is not ruled out.
Ændring 3, 4 og 5 til sondring mellem offentlige og private ordregivere er grundlaget for en kompromistekst til artikel 1 i nærværende forslag til direktiv og to erklæringer, som bliver offentliggjort i EF-tidende.
In the case of Amendments Nos 3, 4 and 5, seeking to make a distinction between public and private awarding entities, a compromise wording was agreed for article 1 of this proposed directive and for two statements published in the Official Journal.
De siger, at forpligtelsen til bekendtgørelse af fordelene ved det vellykkede tilbud og navnet på den vellykkede bydende ikke må skade virksomhedens forretningsinteresser.
The latter state that the obligation to communicate the advantages of the tender selected as well as the name of the successful tenderer must not harm firms' commercial interests.
Fortroligheden af teknisk information skal altså tilgodeses.
The confidentiality of technical information should be guaranteed, in other words.
Et af de store temaer, der ligger til grund for denne betænkning, er spørgsmålet om gensidighed, om at opnå og opretholde sammenlignelige situationer.
One of the dominant themes underlying this report has been the question of reciprocity, of getting and keeping the playing field level.
Selvom Langen-betænkningen omhandlede tilbudsgivning inden for Den Europæiske Union, var det helt tydeligt, selv for dem, der ikke så gerne vil erkende det, at det globale miljø er lige så vigtigt for erhvervslivet i EU som den interne regulering.
Even though the Langen report dealt with procurement inside the European Union, it became quite obvious, even to those who were less inclined to listen, that the global environment is as important to business in the EU as the internal regulation.
Man kan ikke adskille den virkning, som det ene har på konkurrenceevnen i forbindelse med det andet.
You cannot separate the effect one has on the competitive ness of the other.
Det andet punkt er spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt statistikkravene reduceres til et minimum. Det har Kommissionen også tilladt.
The second point is the question of how far statistical requirements can be reduced to a minimum.
Afslutningsvis vil jeg gerne takke alle, som har bidraget konstruktivt og kritisk til denne forhandling, og vi kan i dag sige - jeg antager, at min kollega Tappin også vil støtte det - at der med forslaget endelig er fundet et fornuftigt kompromis i Forligsudvalget - også selvom det tog lang tid - som begge sider bidrog til.
This is not the time to pursue this argument but I am sure I speak for many of my colleagues when I say that' we look forward to the next round of debates, most importantly to establishing transparency and accountability -two key words from Parliament when it comes to procurement.
Det kan vi godt acceptere, og det opfylder vores krav til Verdenhandelsoverenskomsten, bilaget offentlige indkøb, fuldt og helt.
If we can do that, we shall have gone a long way towards a system of procurement regulations which is in line with the wishes expressed at every stage of this report and will enable the user to exercise the skills of business without being hampered by the overburdening of bureaucracy and restrictive legislation.
Dermed kan vi og andre benytte os af et marked med et volumen på ECU 350 milliarder.
This has been our objective. If we achieve all that we would be even more proud.
Det er ikke det rette tidspunkt at diskutere det yderligere, men jeg er sikker på, at jeg taler for mange af mine kolleger, når jeg siger, at vi ser frem til næste runde af debatter, især så vi kan sikre gennemsigtighed og oplysningspligt - to af Parlamentets nøgleord i forbindelse med tilbudsgivning.
In conclusion I would like to thank all those who have given their constructive and critical attention to the consultation process, and I think we can now safely say - I assume my colleague Mr Tappin will concur with this -that the conciliation team has found a sensible compro mise with its proposal - even if it has taken some time to produce - which has been helped along by both sides.
Hvis vi kan det, er vi nået langt i kampen for et system af forskrifter om tilbudsgivning, som er på linje med de ønsker, der er udtrykt på hvert trin i denne betænkning, og som vil gøre det muligt for brugeren at udøve sit erhverv uden at skulle hæmmes af en masse bureaukrati og restriktiv lovgivning.
We can live very well with that and it fully satisfies our requirements under the world trade agreement government purchases annex.
I mellemtiden vil jeg især gerne takke hr. Langen og andre kolleger, der har været så aktive i forbindelse med denne betænkning.
In the meantime, my thanks and congratulations, in par ticular to Mr Langen, and to other colleagues who have been so active in this report.
Tappin (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, jeg takker min kollega, dr. Langen, for at have ført Forligsudvalget mod en så positiv konklusion.
Tappin (PSE). - Mr President, I wish to congratulate my colleague, Mr Langen, for having led the conciliation team to such a successful conclusion.
Jeg har altid syntes, at offentlig tilbudsgivning var fantastisk spændende, og jeg kan se på mødeprocenten her, at der er andre, der deler mit synspunkt. punkt.
I have always thought that public procurement is a bit of a bodice-ripper, and I can see by the attendance here that other people think very much the same.
Giansily (UPE). - (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, i juni 1996 forkastede vores forsamling med et meget stort flertal det af Kommissionen fremsatte direktivforslag, der ville liberalisere reglerne for offentlig tilbudsgivning inden for vand- og energiforsyning samt transport og telekommunikation, da vi fandt, at det var for liberalt, og at det åbnede Europas døre for de amerikanske industrier, uden at Europa fik noget til gengæld. Denne tekst favoriserede
Giansily (UPE). - (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, in June 1996 this Parliament, by a very large majority rejected the draft directive liberalizing the code of public sector contracts, proposed by the Commission, in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors, as this code was deemed to be too liberal and to open up the doors of Europe to American industry without receiving anything in return.
Hele debatten om tilbudsgivning har ændret sig grundlæggende i takt med de fremskridt, vi har gjort, siden Kommissionen første gang forelagde sit forslag for Parlamentet.
The whole of the debate on public procurement has been fundamentally changed by the progress we have made since the Commission first put its proposals before Parliament.
Der var en grundlæggende afstand mellem Parlamentets og Rådets holdning på det pågældende tidspunkt.
At that time, the gap between Parliament's position and that of the Council was fundamental.
Giansily gruppe vil give sin fulde støtte til hr. Langens glimrende betænkning.
Giansily from Mr Porto, who will not be here tomorrow, and I thought you might have used this opportunity to show a little consideration.
Dengang gik teksten lidt for vidt, navnlig for at afskaffe de offentlige koncessioner, der eksisterede inden for mange lokale myndigheder i Unionens lande.
At the time, this draft was pushing the boat out just a little too far, and in particular, sought to demolish the existing public licensing arrangements in many local authorities, in many countries of the Union.
Lad os også minde om, at der i direktivforslaget stod, at en koncern -eller et af dennes datterselskaber - der skulle undersøge gennemførligheden af en investering, ikke efterfølgende kunne deltage i tilbudsgivningen vedrørende udførelsen af denne.
We remind you that this draft directive laid down that an industrial group or one of its subsidiaries asked to carry out studies for a facility would not subsequently be able to bid for its construction.
I rette øjeblik pillede hr. Langen, og det vil vi gerne takke ham for, punkt for punkt dette direktiv fra hinanden, som uden gengæld overlod det europæiske marked til uden landske virksomheder.
At the opportune moment, Mr Langen, and here we wish to congratulate him, took the draft directive apart pointbypoint, as it delivered up the European market to foreign companies, without any reciprocal arrangements.
Siden da er der løbet meget vand i åen, og vi skal nu udtale os om delegationens betænkning til Forligsudvalget.
Since then, much water has passed under the bridge, and we are now in a position to give an opinion on the report of the delegation to the Conciliation Committee.
Bangemann, medlem af Kommissionen. - (DE) Hr. for mand, jeg tror, at jeg kan gøre det kort.
Bangemann, Member of the Commission. - (DE) Mr President, I think I can make this brief.
De har jo alle allerede hørt, at hr. Langen blev rost med rette.
You have all heard how Mr Langen has been rightly praised.
Han bliver nogle gange rost med urette, men i dette tilfælde var det virkelig sandt, at han har bidraget til et meget fornuftigt kompromis. Når Kommissionen også gjorde dette til sidst, viser det sikkert også, at vi er parat til at opnå et resultat i sådan en procedure.
Sometimes he is wrongly praised, but in this instance it is absolutely true that he has helped to produce a very sensible compromise.
Når det nogle gange måske ser anderledes ud i starten, så skyldes det, at mange forskel lige tjenester i Kommissionen af vidt forskellige årsager først og fremmest forsøger at opnå en ideel position for Kommissionen.
If things sometimes look different from the start, then that is because many other services within the Commission are trying to achieve an ideal position for the Commission for all sorts of reasons.
At det nogle gange ikke kan gennemføres, ved vi også godt.
That this is sometimes unworkable is something else we know.
Jeg vil gerne takke Dem endnu en gang, hr. Langen, og jeg ønsker Parlamentet samme succes fremover i sådanne forligsprocedurer som i denne!
May I thank you again, Mr Langen, and wish Parliament equal success in future with conciliation!
Nej, men så afslutter jeg mit indlæg.
President - The debate is closed.
Hr. formand, behandlingen af ændringsforslagene og af disse to erklæringer, som vil blive offentliggjort i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende, beroliger os, og vores
The amended wording of the two statements to be published in the Official Journal, has allayed our fears, Mr President, and our group will fully support Mr Langen's excellent report.
MØDET TIRSDAG DEN 16. DECEMBER 1997
SITTING OF TUESDAY, 16 DECEMBER 1997
Fremskridt inden for retlige og indre anliggender (fortsættelse)
Progress in the areas of justice and home affairs (continuation)
Femte rammeprogram for F & U McNally, Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Schierhuber, Ghilardotti, Imbeni, Schiedermeier, Ferber, Kühne, Adam, McNally, Ojala, Marinucci, Tannert, Vaz da Silva, Scapagnini, Plooij-Van Gorsel, Marset Campos, Aftern, Macartney, Desama, W.G. van Velzen, Pompidou, Alavanos, Holm, Linkohr, Malerba, Lange, Cresson (Kommissionen) 59
Fifth R & D framework programme McNally, Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Schierhuber, Ghilardotti, Imbeni, Schiedermeier, Ferber, Kühne, Adam, McNally, Ojala, Marinucci, Tannert, Vaz da Silva, Scapagnini, Plooij-Van Gorsel, Marset Campos, Ahern, Macartney, Desama, W.G. van Velzen, Pompidou, Alavanos, Holm, Linkohr, Malerba, Lange, Cresson (Commission) 59
Spørgetid (Kommissionen) Smith ': - Spørgsmål nr. 25 (Cars): Anvendelse af bestemmelserne om offentlige indkøb Monti (Kommissionen), Cars, Monti, Wijsenbeek, Monti, Rübig, Monti - Spørgsmål nr. 27 (Hardstaff): Anvendelse af El11-formularerne i medlemsstaterne Flynn (Kommissionen), Hardstaff, Flynn, Truscott, Flynn - Spørgsmål nr. 29 (Fitzsimons): Sikkert legetøj Flynn (Kommissionen), Fitzsimons, Flynn, Schmid, Flynn, D. Martin, Flynn
Question 25 (Cars): Application of the law on public procurement Monti (Commission), Cars, Monti, Wijsenbeek, Monti, Rübig, Monti Question 27 (Hardstaff): The use of Elll forms in Member States Flynn (Commission), Hardstaff, Flynn, Truscott, Flynn Question 29 (Fitzsimons): Toy safety Flynn (Commission), Fitzsimons, Flynn, Schmid, Flynn, D. Martin, Flynn Question 30 (McMahon): Removal of age limits in Commission recruitment
Spørgsmål nr. 30 (McMahon): Fjernelse af aldersgrænser fra Kommissionens stillingsannoncer
Question 31 (Cassidy): Equal opportunities for older workers in recruitment to the European Commission
Spørgsmål nr. 32 (Plooij-Van Gorsel): EU's indsats for at fjerne aldersgrænser iforbindelse med ansættelse
Question 32 (Plooij-van Gorsei): EU action to remove age limits in recruitment
Spørgsmål nr. 33 (Sjöstedt): Konsekvenserne for medlemsstaterne af Europa­Parlamentets førstebehandling af 1998­budgettet
Question 33 (Sjöstedt): Implications for the Member States of the European Parliament's first reading of the 1998 budget
Spørgsmål nr. 36 (Wijsenbeek): Direkte togforbindelse mellem Nederlandene og Polen
Question 34 (Truscott): Tachographs in minibuses N. Kinnock (Commission), Truscott, N. Kinnock Question 35 (Waidelich): Commission document on road safety N. Kinnock (Commission), Waidelich, N. Kinnock, Lindqvist, N. Kinnock Question 36 (Wijsenbeek): Rail shuttle between the Netherlands and Poland
Spørgsmål nr. 43 (Ahern): Det foreslåede projekt til færdiggørelse af Khmelnitski 2­ og Rovno 4atomreaktorerne (k2/r4) i Ukraine
Question 43 (Ahern): Proposed project for the completion of Khmelnitski 2 and Rovno 4 nuclear reactors (k2/r4) in the Ukraine van den Bmek (Commission)', Ahern, van den Broek