natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Således vil man undersøge og udbedre alle de fejl, som Revisionsretten har fundet vedrørende land brugsudgifterne, når det begrandes i forbindelse med regnskabsafslutningen.
Thus, for exam ple, every single error detected by the Court concerning agricultural spending will be examined and recouped whenever justified in the context of the clearance of account procedure.
Vi har set rapporter om, at der tydeligvis findes nogle få problemområder i dag, men når vi når til 1995 i vore regnskabsafslutningssystemer, er det klart, at vi vil bruge alle de oplysninger, vi nu får fra Revisionsretten, for at indkassere pengene fra medlemsstaterne. terne.
We have seen reports that today there are clearly a few problem areas, but when we come to 1995 in our clearance of accounts systems it is clear that the information we now get from the Court will be fully used to recover the money from the Member States.
Mens dette er proceduren for de nuværende strukturfonde, afventer vi den vigtige diskussion om den fremtidige udformning af EU's samhørighedsinstramenter.
While this is the approach for the current structural funds, there is an important discussion coming up on the future shape of the Community's cohesion instruments.
Jeg har noteret mig Revisionsrettens og dens formands overvejelser på dette område.
I note the reflections of the Court and of its President in this area.
Næste forår vil Kommissionen frem lægge en rapport om fremtiden for Fællesskabets struktur fonde.
The Commission will present a report on the future of the Community's structural funds by spring next year.
Denne rapport vil danne baggrund for en debat, der også skal tage udgangspunkt i kravene om forsvarlig økonomisk forvaltning.
This will provide the basis of a debate which should also take the requirements of sound financial management into account.
Hvad angår strukturfondene, har jeg allerede nævnt arbejdet om støtteberettigelse og rettelser.
With regard to structural funds, I have already mentioned the work on eligibiUty and corrections.
Revisionserklæringen har i denne forbindelse været meget nyttig for os, fordi den har lokaliseret problemerne.
DAS, as such, has been an extremely helpful exercise for us because it has identified where the problems are.
Det har styrket vor position i diskussionerne med medlemsstaterne, men samtidig vil jeg geme påpege, at der også er et forskudssystem, som hindrer, at de projekter, der ikke er støtteberettigede, fåren varig indvirkning på Fællesskabets budget.
It has strengthened our position in our discussions with the Member States. But, at the same time, I want to note that there is also a system of advances which prevents those projects which have been found to be ineligible from having a lasting effect on the Community budget.
Sådanne fejl bør derfor klassificeres særskilt fra de betydelige fejl.
Such errors should therefore be classified separately from the substantial errors.
Lad mig til sidst slutte med at lykønske Dem, hr. Friedmann, med den første årsberetning under Deres formand skab.
Finally, let me conclude by congratulating you, President Friedmann, for the first Annual Report under your leader ship.
Kommissionen har fuldt ud forpligtet sig til at samarbejde med formanden for Budgetkontroludvalget, fra Theato, ordføreren, hr. Wynn, og alle de medlemmer af Parlamentet, der er med til at drage de nødvendige konklusioner. sioner.
The Commission is fully committed to working with the chairman of the Budgetary Control Committee, Mrs Theato, and the rapporteur, Mr Wynn, and all the Members of Parliament involved to draw the required conclusions.
Vi indleder nu forhandlingen. Den første, der får ordet, bliver hr. Tomlinson for De Europæiske Socialdemokraters Gruppe.
We shall now begin the debate, starting with Mr Tomlinson, on behalf of the Group of the Party of European Socialists.
Jeg vil også geme sige, at Kommissionen og Revisionsret ten også er uenige på nogle områder.
In addition, I want to say that there are also areas of disagreement between the Commission and the Court.
Der er tilfælde, hvor det kan være lidt vanskeligt at forstå Revisionsrettens kritik. Revisionsretten har for eksempel kritiseret visse rapporteringskrav, som Kommissionen stiller til de land brugsorganisationer, der modtager EU-støtte.
There are instances where the criticism of the Court is slightly difficult to understand.
Men ville Kommissionen ikke blive kritiseret for manglende gen nemsigtighed og kontrol, hvis den ikke stillede sådanne krav?
But would not the Commission otherwise be criticized for a lack of transparency and control?
For det andet er .det i andre tilfælde vigtigt, at Revisionsretten klart skelner mellem sine afgørelser som revisor og sine politiske holdninger. Hvad angår det agromonetære system, bør Revisionsretten som revisor fokusere på korrekt anvendelse af de eksisterende regler.
Secondly, in other cases it is important that the Court draws a clear Une between its judgment as an auditor and its political opinion.
Enhver kritik af selve systemet bør være klart adskilt.
Any criticism of the system itself should be kept clearly separate.
Det kan godt være, at jeg deler nogle af Revisionsrettens politiske synspunkter, men som kommissær med ansvar for budgettet skal jeg respektere de vedtagne bestemmelser.
I do not mean here that I may perhaps share some political views of the Court. As the Commissioner responsible for the budget, I have to respect the accepted regulations.
Jeg kan ikke tillade mig at sige, at vi ikke bryder os om nogle af forordningerne, og at vi derfor kan gøre det på vores egen måde.
I cannot decide that these are regulations that we do not like, so we will do it our own way.
Det kan Revisionsretten gøre, men det er vigtigt, at disse to spørgsmål holdes adskilt.
It is the right of the Court, but it is important that these two issues are kept separate.
Tomlinson (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, jeg var glad for at modtage De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende i aftes og se, at man selv her søger at samarbejde med Kommissio-
Tomlinson (PSE). - Mr President, I was glad to receive the Official Journal last night and to see that even it is trying to collaborate with the Commission.
Hvorledes kan det forenes med, at næsten en fjerdedel af de bevillinger, der står til rådighed, slet ikke bliver anvendt? 90 % af de fejl, Revisionsretten har konstateret i sin erklæring, begås i den sammenhæng af medlemslandene.
And 90 % of the errors established by the Court in this respect in its statement of assurance were committed in the Member States.
Jeg hilser derfor årsberetningen velkommen, men jeg vil ikke afsige en forhastet dom på baggrund af den.
So, I welcome the report but I am not going to rush to judgment on the basis of it.
Her og nu vil jeg bekræfte, at der er nogle alvorlige bemærkninger i årsberetningen, men jeg vil også give kommissæren ret i, at vi skal skelne mellem revisionsansvaret og de politikker, som undertiden giver anledning til kritik.
This morning I want to acknowledge that there are some serious comments in it but equally acknowledge what the Commissioner has said, namely that we have to distinguish between the auditing responsibility and the policies that sometimes give rise to the criticism.
Endnu et eksempel: Bevillinger til en øget indsats mod svig i landbruget i medlemsstaterne er for millioner af ecus vedkommende blevet anvendt til andet formål og først og fremmest til dækning af personaleudgifter.
To give another example, appropriations running into millions of ECU intended for stepping up the campaign against fraud in agriculture in the Member States were used for other purposes, notably to cover staffing costs.
Her skal Kom missionen stilles til regnskab.
The Commission must take on its responsibilities here.
Den bliver nødt til at forklare os, hvorledes den vil hente de 16, 6 mio ecu, der er blevet brugt ukorrekt på dette område, tilbage fra medlemsstaterne. terne.
It will have to explain to us how it plans to retrieve the ECU 16.6 million wrongly spent in this sector from the Member States.
Alligevel falder verificeringen efter min opfattelse snarere negativ ud.
In my opinion, the statement turns out rather more negatively, however.
De alvorlige saglige fejl udgør efter Revisionsrettens oplysninger næsten 6 % af alle udbetalinger, dvs. ca. 4 mia ecu.
According to the Court, the 'substantial material errors' amount to nearly 6 % of all payments, in other words around ECU 4 billion.
Aret før drejede det sig om 2, 4 mia, altså helt klart om mindre.
Last year, the figure was significantly lower, at ECU 2.4 bn.
Hvad er forklaringen på denne stigning?
How can this increase be explained?
Revisionserklæringen er et relativt nyt instrument, som vi kan bruge.
Turning to the statement of assurance, this is a relatively new instrument available to us.
Det har stor betydning.
It is one which is extremely important.
Beføjelserne blev givet Revisionsretten i Maastrichttraktaten, og det er anden gang, Revisionsretten med rette ikke har set sig i stand til at give os denne revisionserklæring.
This power was given to the Court of Auditors by the Maastricht Treaty and this is the second time the Court of Auditors quite rightly and properly has not been able to give us that statement of assurance.
Og det drejer sig ikke blot om udgifter.
And it does not just relate to expenditure.
Hvis vi ser på egne indtægter, står det klart og tydeligt i Revisionsrettens revisionserklæring, at man selvfølgelig ikke kan garantere, at al skattepligtig import er blevet deklareret.
If we look, for example, at own resources, in the statement of assurance the Court of Auditors is saying quite clearly to us that it is obviously not possible to provide an assurance that all taxable imports have actually been declared.
Vi ved, at det er en kraftig underdrivelse.
We know that is a very substantial understatement.
Vi kan med sikkerhed sige, at alle indførsler ikke er blevet deklareret, og at det er grunden til, at Parlamentet har nedsat et undersøgelsesudvalg, der skal undersøge transitsystemet.
We may say that quite definitely not aU the income has been declared and that is why this Parliament has estabUshed a Committee of Inquiry into the transit system.
Det er et af de områder, hvor der er et betydeligt tab af egne indtægter i EU's almindelige budget.
That is one of the areas where there is a major loss of own resources to the European Union budget.
Killilea (UPE). - (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil geme gratulere formanden for Revisionsretten med hans beretning i mor ges og rejse et bestemt spørgsmål.
I would once again thank you for the report, and I am also grateful to Mr Liikanen for all his efforts, particularly with regard to SEM 2000 and improving the management of the budget.
Når vi ser på kritikken af betalingssiden i revisionserklæringen, er der to-tre ting, der bliver helt tydelige.
When we look at the criticisms of the payments side made in the statement of assurance, two or three things become very clear.
Jeg var en smule skuffet over, at Revisionsretten ikke fremhævede en af sine egne kommentarer. Når man ser på de meget betydelige fejl, kunne Revisionsretten i den revisionserklæring, som pressen beretter om i dag, have påpeget, at de fleste fejl blev begået i medlemsstaterne.
I was slightly disappointed that the Court of Auditors did not emphasize one of its own comments; when looking at the very substantial errors, it could have pointed out in the statement, which will be covered by the press today, that most of the errors it chased in the statement of assurance procedure occurred in the Member States.
Revisionsretten siger, at 90 % af de fejl, der hindrede den i at give en revisionserklæring, fandt sted i medlemsstaterne, og specielt i de medlemsstater, der benytter den først givne lejlighed til at rette en anklagende finger mod Den Euro pæiske Union.
It says that 90 % of the errors that led it not to be able to give a statement of assurance were errors that took place in the Member States, largely in those very Member States that take the first opportunity to point the finger of accusation at the European Union.
Det er helt sikkert en af de ting, mit parti vil se meget nøje på i forbindelse med dechargeproceduren.
That is certainly one of the things my party will be looking at very closely in the discharge procedure.
Vi glæder os over hr. Friedmanns årsberetning og revisionserklæring.
We welcome Mr Friedmann's two reports.
Vi ønsker Revisionsretten tillykke med dem, da de giver os grundlag for at udføre vort arbejde, men det er ikke den endelige udgave af resultatet af vore overvejelser.
We congratulate the Court of Auditors on them as providing the basis for our work but not the definitive statement of what will be the outcome of our deliberations.
Endelig var jeg i sidste uge temmelig rystet over et uafhængigt fjernsynsprograms personlige angreb på vore venner hr. Tomlinson, hr. Wynn, Revisionsretten, Revisionsrettens formand og hr. Balfe, der alle repræsenterer Parlamentets strukturer, samt over, at Parlamentets for mand ikke kom med en redegørelse om det.
Finally, I was rather appalled last week at the personalized attack made on our friends Mr Tomlinson, Mr Wynn, the Court of Auditors, its President and Mr Balfe, who all represent the structures of this Parliament, by an independent television programme and at the fact that the President of this Parliament did not make a statement on it.
Det var meget uretfærdigt, at John Tomlinson af alle blev hængt ud.
It was quite unfair that, of all people, John Tomlinson should have been singled out.
Jeg er ikke altid enig i hans synspunkter, men han er og har altid været et godt eksempel på et parlamentsmedlem.
I may not always agree with him but as a working Member of this Parliament he is a fine example and always has been.
Theato (PPE), formand for Budgetkontroludvalget. -(DE) Hr. formand, hr. kommissær, hr. formand for Den Europæiske Revisionsret, jeg har ikke megen tid til at takke Dem for forelæggelsen af Revisionsrettens vægtige årsberetning for 1995 samt af en række særberetninger med
Theato (PPE), chairman of the Committee on Budgetary Control. - (DE) Mr President, Commissioner, Mr President of the Court of Auditors, I have only a little time in which to thank you for presenting the Court's weighty annual report for 1995, together with a number of special reports and the relevant statements of assurance.
Formanden. ­ Hr. Killilea har, som alle vil have bemær­ket, benyttet sig af dette formandsskift, men sådan bliver det ikke for de næste talere.
Kjer Hansen discussions at how the Member States have so far dealt with the directions they were given.
Netop den forbavselse, vi følte, den utrolige konstatering af, at retningslinjer simpelt hen ikke bliver fulgt og at frister derfor skal forlænges, ses nu også af Revisionsret­tens beretning.
It is precisely this sense of amazement, this incredible realization that directions are simply not being implemented and so time limits have to be extended, which is now reflected in the report from the Court of Auditors.
Med god grund blev uopsætteligheden da heller ikke vedtaget i dag.
Today's request for urgency was quite rightly not approved.
Men det er dét, der er detailar­bejdet.
But that is the detailed work.
Det er ikke det iøjnefaldende, hvormed man effek­tivt kan vise offentligheden, hvor det bærer hen.
These are not the spectacular things which can be used to bring home to the public what is happening.
Men det er dét, der forårsager vanskelighederne, nemlig at der findes mange, også mange gode forordninger, men at de ikke eller kun mangelfuldt omsættes, eller at det er vanskeligt virke­lig at kontrollere denne gennemførelse.
This is what is giving rise to difficulties, however - the fact that there are many good regulations which are being applied inadequately or not at all, and that it is hard to actually monitor their implementation. tation.
Kjer Hansen (ELDR). ­ Hr. formand, trods de positive fremskridt er der stadig væk store problemer, og det er ufatteligt, at der igen kan blive rettet en massiv kritik af Kommissionens regnskabsføring og den økonomiske for­valtning af Fællesskabets midler.
and it is incredible that there should again be a massive criticism of the Commission's accounting system and the economic management of the Community's resources.
Det er utroligt, at det år efter år er den samme kritik, der bliver rejst.
It is incomprehensible that the same criticisms should be raised year after year.
Derfor vil vi i Den Liberale Gruppe ikke længere acceptere, at Kommis­sionen kan se stort på den massive kritik, der fremføres fra Revisionsrettens side.
That is why we in the Liberal Group is no longer prepared to accept the unconcerned approach of the Commission, which is responsible for the management of EU resources.
Derfor vil vi kræve, at kommissærerne stiller i Budgetkontroludvalget én efter én, også efter at vi har afgivet decharge, for kommissærerne er forpligtede til at følge de anvisninger, der bliver givet.
We would therefore call on the Commission ers also to be involved one by one in the Committee on Budgetary Control after we have adopted the report, in the context of Commissioners being under obligation to follow the instructions issued.
Hvis der ikke bliver rettet op på de problemer, som er anvist i årsberetningen, skal der være mulighed for, at kommissæren kan mødes med et mistillidsvotum.
If no solution is found to the problems referred to in the Annual Report, there is the possibility of Commissioners having to face a vote of no confidence.
Jeg vil også opfordre til, at vi får ændret traktaten, så vi får etableret en procedure for en opfølgning af Revisionsret­tens kritik.
I would also suggest that we amend the Treaty so that we can establish a procedure for following up the criticisms made by the Court of Auditors.
Problemet er jo, at efter Europa­Parlamentet har afgivet decharge for det samlede budget, så er man ligeglad med de fremførte kritikpunkter.
The problem facing us is that, once the European ParUament has approved the combined budget, it tends to be indifferent to any subsequent criticisms.
Det vil vi have sat en stopper for.
We need to put a stop to this.
Jeg har en alvorlig bekymring.
I have one great concern.
SEM 2000 er blevet nævnt, og det hed sig, at medlemsstaterne i det store og hele er indforstået dermed. Men jeg har nu hørt, at netop på strukturfondområdet melder medlemsstater eller dele af medlemsstater allerede nu, at det, der står i SEM 2000 ikke er i overensstemmelse med deres forfatnings­ eller forvalt­ningsvirkelighed.
SEM 2000 has been referred to, and it was said that, by and large, the Member States were in agreement with it.
Det vil sige, at vi ser et middel, der kan afhjælpe et problem, og straks formeres geledderne i medlemsstaterne for at underminere det, der vedtages.
This means that while we see a remedy, people are already lining up in the Member States to undermine the decisions which are being taken.
Det gør mig langt mere bekymret, end en stor skandale som enkelttilfælde kunne have gjort.
That causes me a great deal more concern than one major individual scandal would have done.
Garriga Polledo (PPE). ­ (ES) Hr. formand, hr. Tomlinson har med sin sædvanlige skarpsindighed redegjort for Par­lamentets normale procedure for behandling og opfølgning af Revisionsrettens beretning.
Garriga Polledo (PPE). - (ES) Mr President, Mr Tomlinson has shown his usual acuteness in explaining the usual parliamentary procedure for dealing with the Court of Auditors' report.
Wolf (V). ­ (DE) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, hr. formand Friedmann, hr. kommissær, jeg synes vi her virkelig bliver nødt til i højere grad at tone rent flag.
Wolf (V). - (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I think that we should really be doing more to name names here, in political terms.
På baggrund af prioriteringen af bekæmpelsen af massearbejdsløshed og social udstødelse bliver vi nødt til at nævne den egentlige skandale, som er, at medlemsstaterne kvalitativt og kvan­titativt forholder sig tavse og at Kommissionen, både hvad angår fastsættelsen af målene og sanktionsmulighederne, kun har stumpe instrumenter til sin rådighed.
In view of the priority given to combating mass unemployment and social exclusion, we need to identify the real scandal, which is that the Member States are stalling in terms of quality and quantity, whilst the Commission has only blunt tools in its hands both as regards defining the objectives and applying sanctions.
På landbrugs­området har Kommissionen helt andre muligheder for at bruge sanktioner.
In the agricultural sector, the Commission has quite different scope for taking sanctions.
Hvorfor er det ikke lige sådan for strukturfondenes vedkommende?
Why is that not so in the case of the Structural Funds?
Jeg må dog påpege, at denne procedure er afveget, for så vidt angår sektoren for olivenolie.
But I must point out that there is an anomaly in it concerning the procedure relating to olive oil.
Landbrugskommissæren synes med et bestemt formål for øje at have foregrebet en fremtidig beretning fra Revisionsretten til at retfærdiggøre et forslag om ændring af den fælles markedsordning for olivenolie, som klarν er til skade for producentemes inte­resser.
In fact, the Commissioner for Agriculture seems deliberately to have used a future report by the Court of Auditors to justify the presentation of a reform of the olive oil COM which is clearly prejudicial to producers' interests.
Hr. kommissær Liikanen, også til Dem et spørgsmål.
There is a question for you here too, Mr Liikanen.
Er der ikke i forbindelse med SEM 2000 risiko for, at vi gennem­fører en formalisering og dermed skaber en formelt korrekt facade, bag hvilken økonomerne laver refinansiering, an­vender bevillingerne efter deres vilkårligt fastlagte budget­behov og samtidig holder specialafdelingerne udenfor?
Is there not a danger, in connection with SEM 2000, that we are formalizing matters and thereby creating a technically correct façade, behind which those who run the budget carry out refinancing exercises, spend the appropriations according to their arbitrary budget needs and thus exclude thè specialist departments?
I den foreliggende beretning fra Revisionsretten er der ikke sket væsentlige ændringer i forhold til tidligere år, hvoraf vi udleder, at den er blevet brugt som påskud til at retfærdiggøre en reform, som der ikke er teknisk og regnskabsmæssigt belæg for i Revisionsrettens beretning.
In this Court of Auditors' report there seems to be no substantial change to previous years, so we can only deduce that there has been deliberate and partial use of the report in order to justify a reform which does not appear in a technical or accounting way in the Court of Auditors' report.
Lige et sidste punkt: Er det ikke muligt på alle disse områder at nå frem til en koordinering med de nationale revisionsinstitutioner?
And finally, is it not possible to coordinate with the national audit bodies in all these areas?
Kun på den måde kan vi virkelig få en politisk kontrol, ved hjælp af hvilken indholdet af en europæiske socialpolitiks mål så gennemføres.
Only by this means can we actually exercise some form of political control, through which the aims of a European social'policy are then translated into substance.
Til formanden for Revisionsretten vil jeg sige, at jeg takker ham for de værdifulde beretninger, hans institution udar­bejder, men at det omtalte tilfælde efter min mening vil kunne skade samme institutions image.
Mr President of me Court Auditors, although I must congratulate you on the value of your Institution's report, I am afraid that this might harm its image.
Mulder (ELDR). ­ (NL) Hr. formand, jeg vil koncentrere mig om Den Europæiske Unions indtægter.
Mulder (ELDR), - (NL) Mr President, I should like to focus on the subject of the European Union's revenue.