natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det samme gælder for regional- og miljøpolitikken. Man bør imidlertid ikke forsøge at skære alt over én kam.
In our policy regarding the monitoring of mergers, we have tried to do this correctly - and in saying that I can.
Der må altså være noget, der i sin kerne kun og udelukkende er industripolitik, kun og udelukkende konkurrencepolitik osv.
I believe, also speak on behalf of Karel Van Miert and Sir Leon Brittan, who was previously responsible for this area.
Af de 100 ansøgninger, som vi hidtil har haft til udtalelse, er én eneste blevet afslået.
Of the 100 applications that we have so far had to judge, only one was turned down.
Nogle blev gjort betinget, men kun kun én eneste blev afslået.
Several were made subject to requirements, but only one was rejected.
Deraf kan De se, at vi ikke betragter sammenslutningen som sådan som konkurrencefjendtlig. men derimod altid undersøger, om den rent faktisk også har konkurrencehindrende virkninger.
This shows that we do not regard mergers per se to be anti-competitive, but rather check to see whether an individual merger would actually have anti-competitive consequences.
I denne sammenhæng må man definere markedet og pro duktet; derved kan der snige sig fejl ind.
In this context both the market and the product must be defined, whereby errors can creep in.
Der hersker måske ofte en tendens til at definere noget for snævert, hvis man ikke ønsker en sammenslutning, men det kan man også undgå.
Sometimes, per haps, there is a tendency to define something rather too narrowly when seeking to avoid a merger. However, this can be prevented.
For konkurrencepolitikken er denne definition meget vigtig.
Even if we wanted to do so, there would be no legal basis for such action.
Hvis man nemlig i dette tilfælde laster skibet for meget - og jeg taler hér udtrykkeligt som kommissær, der ikke er ansvarlig for konkurrencepolitikken -, så truer grundtanken i konkurrencen, respektive bevarelsen af konkurrence, med at gå til grunde ud fra en lang række andre synspunkter.
The Commission has no way of telling an enterprise that it should opt for firm A. rather than firm B. Purely on the basis of the general political viewpoint regarding the internal market, nobody will hit upon the idea that the selection of a European partner from a Member State of the European Union is worse per se than the selection of a Japanese partner. You know - and I have repeatedly said this to Alan Donnelly - that the Commission is not of the opinion that we should keep Japanese or American companies out of the Community.
Der kan altid findes mennesker, som fremkommer med det argument, at konkurrencen i et konkret tilfælde skal udelukkes ud fra regionalpolitiske synspunkter, eller at miljøpolitiske synspunkter kræver en tilsidesættelse af konkurrencen. Det anser jeg for forkert.
The group that will now supposedly press on with developments in the telecommunications sector com prises two enterprises, IBM Europe, on the one hand, which - in terms of its shareholding majority - is really and truly an American company, even if it is active in Europe, and the British firm ICL. on the other hand, which however, as you all know, has clear links with a Japanese parent company.
Det kan man dog virkelig ikke sige!
There is really no way we can say that!
Ønsker vi nu at være europæere, eller vil vi -fortsat være nationalister?
In my capacity as the Commissioner responsible for industry.
Jeg er i min egenskab af industrikommissær aktivt gået ind for - jeg har så at sige lavet reklamekampagner i London og Paris -, at ikketyske firmaer deltager i genopbygningen af den østtyske økonomi. Det har eksempelvis i Frankrig vundet positivt gehør.
I have actively endeavoured - organizing advertising events in London and Paris, as it were - to ensure that non-German firms would participate in rebuilding the economy of eastern Germany.
Hvis jeg husker rigtigt, er 11% af salgene i Treuhand gået til franske firmaer.
If I rightly remember, then I 1 % of sales made by the Treuhand went to French firms.
Jeg finder det godt!
I think that is good!
Vort indre marked kan jo vel ikke kun være til for varer, tjenester og mennesker, men det må naturligvis også tjene kapitalen, dva. der må finde forgreninger sted hen over grænserne.
Qur internal market cannot simply be there for goods, services and people; it must naturally also serve capital, i.e. there must be cross-border interrelationships. lationships.
De vil bære over med mig, at jeg ikke foregriber begivenhedernes gang nu.
In the latter case, it must be subsidized, either by means of state aid, or by contributions on the part of consumers.
Jeg vil dog gerne komme ind på nogle politiske spørgsmål, der blev stillet i denne sammenhæng, f.eks. spørgsmålet om. hvad det betyder i relation til deltagelse og information af arbejdstagere.
I do not understand why jobs that are not profitable should be maintained at any price, at the cost of either taxpayers or consumers.
Fru Crawley har spurgt, hvad vi nu gør på dette område.
That cannot be a social policy!
Der var nogen, der tidligere pegede på det - jeg tror, det var fru Read -, at information af arbejdstagerne også medvirker til, at de på passende måde yder deres bidrag i virksomheden.
Moreover, it is not even satisfactory for the people working in such enterprises.
Forestillingen om, at man kan lade sine medarbejdere svæve i lykkelig uvidenhed, og at de så gladelig yder deres skærv, det forekommer mig at høre den tidlige kapitalisme til.
If we could succeed in establishing competitive telecom munications enterprises, which are, after all, really com petitive in the private sector, then we could make the jobs involved not only more secure, but also more lucrative for those people working there.
Enhver fornuftig virksomhedsleder vil i dag være opsat på at sørge for. at hans arbejdstagere ved, hvordan sagerne står, og hvad de må forvente af dette firma.
In the end, that is better for the Community than an existence which has to be constantly propped up by subsidies.
De har spurgt, om det altsammen giver mening rent industripolitisk?
You asked me whether the whole undertaking makes sense in industrial policy terms. Mrs Crawley.
Vi kan altså gå ud fra, at virksomheden ikke på klassisk vis laver en overtagelse for at låne penge ud og derefter udsuge det overtagne firma, således at de penge, som den har lånt ud, igen betales tilbage, men derimod må vi gå ud fra, at der er tale om en forretningsmæssig afgørelse, også af hensyn til arbejdspladserne i Rover - BMW har jo sagt det tydeligt.
Consequently, we can assume that the enterprise is not borrowing money, as in a classical takeover situation, only to then proceed to suck the acquired firm dry and then pay back the money it had borrowed. Rather, it was a corporate decision, also in the interest of jobs at Rover - BMW has said this quite clearly.
Vi har ingen grund til al tvivle på det.
We have no reason to doubt the truth of it.
For så vidt angår British Aerospace, så giver denne nye udvikling ikke noget fingerpeg om, at vi skulle have overset noget ved undersøgelsen.
As far as British Aerospace is concerned, this new development gives no indication that we might have missed something during the checking procedure.
Hvis der altså dukker nye kendsgerninger op, kan vi undersøge dette yderligere, især, hvis De siger, at British Aerospace dermed blot betaler sin gamle gæld tilbage.
So. if new facts should come to light, we can perform further checks, especially, if- as you claim - British Aerospace is only using this to pay back some of its debts.
Også gæld kan slå en virksomhed til jorden.
Debts can also bring enterprises to their knees.
Resultatet, nemlig at British Aerospace med disse midler igen bliver mere likvid, er set ud fra et industripolitisk synspunkt ikke kritisabelt.
The result, namely that British Aerospace is now more solvent again thanks to these funds, is beyond criticism in the context of industrial policy.
For så vidt det angår, behøver De ikke tilskrive mig, ej heller Kommissionen, æren herfor.
I cannot adopt a direct stance on this, because that is a highly particular question. I do not recall this particular point in the Court of Auditors' report.
Jeg siger ikke dette med baggrund i den foreliggende sag, for sådanne sager kan vi ikke vurdere hér.
A cartel of this kind can have a negative influence on the budget, in which case the Court of Auditors would have been right in demanding this check.
Fru Crawley, vi kan ikke tvinge firmaet British Aerospace til at vælge Honda i stedet for BMW.
However, it is to be assumed that if it has a negative effect a cartel will generate price increases, thereby earning an artificially high turnover.
Vi ville slet ikke have noget juridisk grundlag herfor, og heller ikke, selv om der er nogen, der anser det for fornuftigt, for hvordan skal Kommissionen være i stand til at vurdere, hvilket af tilbuddene, der er mere gunstigt for British Aerospace?
This turnover gives us value added tax. So. if we are to take seriously the demand made by the Court of Auditors, that would mean we would have to stand up for cartels when judging their effect on the Community budget, for they raise our income.
Det er heller ikke vor opgave, det må et sådant firma selv kunne afgøre!
However, that cannot be the intention of this remark, and that is why we will not find it that easy to find an answer, Mr Wynn.
Jeg kommer nu til andre problemer, der blev berørt, navnlig også af hr. Beumer.
I shall now move on to another problem that was raised, in particular by Mr Beumer.
Vi er, som også hr. Beumer, meget bekymrede over udvidelsen af statslig støtte.
Like Mr Beumer, we too are extremely concerned at the spread of state aid.
Vi har fået forelagt en rappgrt om omfanget af statslige subventioner i medlemslandene. Vi ved, at de store og betalingsdygtige medlemslande, så som eksempelvis Forbundsrepublikken, i gennemsnit betaler langt mere i subventioner end små lande, som det går dårligere, og som har færre penge.
A report on the extent of state subsidies awarded by the Member States has now ben presented to us.
Det er ikke godt.
That is not good.
Derfor har vi presset på for at la trukket sådanne subventioner tilbage.
That is why we have pressed for such subsidies to be retracted.
For så vidt angår de nye lande - det er Dem bekendt - har vi gjort visse undtagelser.
I hope that I have expressed myself clearly in the short time available.
Men også her har vi passet på, at der ikke opstår konkurrenceforvridninger.
We are against cartels, because they hamper competition.
Selv om vi gerne ville det, ville vi ikke have noget lovmæssigt grundlag herfor.
As you well know, we made certain exceptions in the case of the new Länder.
Kommissionen har ingen mulighed for at sige til en virksomhed: Du skal vælge virksomhed A og ikke virksomhed B. Alene ud fra generelle politiske synspunkter i det indre marked er der dog ingen, der vil komme på den idé, at valget af en europæisk partner, en partner fra et land i Den Europæ iske Union, i sig selv er dårligere end valget af en japansk partner.
However, here too we took care that no distortions of competition arose. For instance, the subsidies planned for shipyards, to which you referred in particular, were only granted on condition that clear reductions in capacity were made, and we will take great care to ensure that the relevant capacities are indeed reduced as agreed.
Blot ville jeg. fru Crawley, have haft et problem, og det ikke som tysker-jeg taler nu tilfældigvis som tyskerom en fusion.
In the meantime, we are experiencing less difficulties with. say. liberalizing the telecommunications sector, because the Member States have agreed that the monopolies that have existed up to now did not organize things any better - not even in terms of jobs, by the way. There
Statsmonopoler og andre eksklusivrettigheder må opgives.
I hope that I have gone into all the main questions.
Gudskelov indser medlemslandene dette i stigende omfang. I mellemtiden har vi eksempelvis færre vanskeligheder med liberalise-
I would like to say something about the speech by Alan Donnelly.
Så kunne man bedre få de indbyrdes forbindelser frem i lyset, end dette er muligt under behandlingen af enkeltberetninger, hvilket afgjort er utilfredsstillende.
Then, the interconnections could all be dealt with more clearly than is the case with individual reports, which is certainly unsatisfactory.
Så må den subventioneres, enten gennem statslige subventioner eller gennem forbrugernes bidrag.
It is not strictly speaking a question of privatization because it was already a private firm.
Det er i øvrigt ikke engang tilfredsstillende for de mennesker, der arbejder i sådanne virksomheder.
If you are looking for an objective barometer for that, the price of BMW shares went up considerably.
Hvis det skulle lykkes os at stable konkurrencedygtige telekommunikationsvirksomheder på benene, der nu reelt er konkurrencedygtige i privat økonomisk henseende, så kunne arbejdspladserne være ikke blot sikrere, men også mere lukrative for dem, der arbejder der.
Of course there are expectations involved as well - but this shows there is a certain expectation of economic success.
Donnelly (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er taknemmelig for hr. Bangemanns bemærkning til sidst om en samlet debat om økonomiske spørgsmål i fremtiden.
Donnelly (PSE). - Mr President. I am grateful for Mr Bangemann's comment at the end about an integrated debate on economic issues in the future.
Jeg håber, han kan gå videre med det.
I hope he can pursue that.
Jeg stillede ham imidlertid et konkret spørgsmål om virkningen af indre investeringer: eftersom mange regioner i Den Europæiske Union er afhængige af indre investeringer og gode forbindelser med tredjelande, der investerer i de regioner, som har stor arbejdsløshed, mener han da, at den måde, som British Aerospace har behandlet Honda på, er en model for fremtiden?
However, I asked him a specific question about the effect on inward investment: since many regions of the European Union depend upon inward investment and good relations with third countries which invest in the regions which have high unemployment, does he feel that the way in which British Aerospace has treated Honda is a model for the future?
Eller er det måske noget, vi ikke bør gentage i fremtiden, ihukommende at vi ønsker at prøve at fremme yderligere investeringer fra tredjelande i Fællesskabets ugunstigt stillede randområder?
Or is it perhaps something we should not repeat in the future, bearing in mind we want to try to encourage more inward invest ment from outside European Union into disadvantaged regions around Europe?
Med hensyn til lufttrafikken, så falder heller ikke dette område ind under min kompetence.
If I were being asked to comment on Honda acquiring Rover, I would say exactly the same, namely that it is up to the industry to choose whoever it considers its best partner so long as no competition rule is violated.
Christopher Jackson (PPE). - (EN) Hr. formand, jeg kan i høj grad tilslutte mig de bemærkninger, der blev fremsat af kommissæren.
Jackson, Christopher (PPE). - Mr President, I much agree with the comments the Commissioner made.
Jeg vil gerne spørge ham, om han er enig i det synspunkt, at Rovers seneste glimrende præstation, der retfærdiggjorde en høj pris, aldeles ikke er noget at skamme sig over, men tværtimod endnu en gang illustrerer privatiseringens fortrin?
I should like to ask him whether he agrees that far from being something to be ashamed of, the recent splendid record of Rover, which justified a high price, is illustrating yet again the merits of privatization?
Han ville være for høflig, hvis han også sagde, at det ligeledes illustrerer tåbeligheden i Labour's fortsatte forkærlighed for en nationaliserigspolitik. Men det er den naturlige konsekvens af det.
He would be too polite to continue to say that it also illustrates the folly of Labour's continued adherence to a policy of nationalization.
Crawley (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, det er irriterende at se konservative i Europa-Parlamentet bruge, hvad der er en meget seriøs debat om konkurrencepolitik, som middel til at dæmpe deres neurose i anledning af det antal mandater, de vil miste om ca. fire måneder.
It is not logical to put that argument forward. My question is: what would the President of Honda have said if he had acquired Roverand someone had asked him if he did not feel it was a sad thing that Britain is losing its last manufacturer?
Allerførst vil jeg gerne takke kommissær Bangemann for de positive svar, han gav på hele spørgsmålet om at udvikle en egentlig hørings- og informationsprocedure for arbejdstagerne.
If you look at it in a sentimental way I can understand that some British people are disappointed.
Nu vil jeg også gerne gå ind på hr. Wynns kommentarer. Jeg kan ikke direkte på nuværende tidspunkt tage stilling til det, for det er et meget specielt spørgsmål. Jeg har ikke dette ene punkt fra Revionsretten i erindring.
Crawley (PSE). - Mr President, it is irritating to see Conservatives in this Parliament using what is a very serious debate about competition for their neurosis about the number of seats they are going to lose in four months' time.
Hvis man nemlig undersøger, hvilke virkninger et kartel har på Fælles skabets budget, kan der fremkomme to ting.
That will be very much appreciated by the workers in Rover at Longbridge which is part of the European constituency that I represent.
Et sådant kartel kan have en negativ indflydelse på budgettet, og så havde Revisionsretten med rette kunnet kræve denne undersøgelse.
I would ask for your forbearance. As the German saying goes: 'The fox decided that the grapes were too sour' because it could not reach them.
Men det må antages, at et kartel, når det udfolder sin negative virkning, fremkalder prisstigninger og dermed opnår en kunstigt oppustet omsætning.
My impression is that the President of Honda would argue quite differently, if he had succeeded in acquiring Rover. However.
Af denne omsætning får vi moms.
I do not wish to comment on that.
Hvis man altså skulle tage Revisionsrettens opfordring alvorligt, ville det betyde, at vi måtte gå ind for karteller, når vi vurderer deres virkning på Fællesskabets budget, for 'de forøger vore indtægter.
Instead, I shall refer you once again to the statement by British Aerospace, which was also passed on to you, and which explains why British Aerospace opted in favour of BMW.
Men det kan ikke være meningen med denne bemærkning, og derfor vil svaret ikke falde os helt let, hr. Wynn.
It did not do so because BMW is a German firm, but rather because the conditions at which Honda was prepared to take over Rover were obviously worse than the conditions offered by BMW.
Jeg håber, at jeg har udtrykt mig i korthed.
Very briefly I should like to say that I think we got our wires crossed.
Vi er imod karteller, fordi de påvirker konkurrencen negativt. Vi er ikke imod karteller, fordi de haren negativ indflydelse på Fællesskabets budget.
I know the Commissioner likes intellectualizing on his feet and I wanted him to debate with me whether there was anything in the president of Honda's belief that it is important for a country to have at least one volume car manufacturer based in that country; not that the car manufacturer necessarily has all the shares in that company but that it is based in that country.
Det står ikke i vore konkurrence betingelser.
How would he feel if Germany had no more volume car manufacturers?
For så vidt det angår, har vi ikke nogen undersøgelsespligt.
Is that good or bad for industry in Europe?
Hvordan ville han have det, hvis Tyskland ikke længere havde store automobilfabrikker? Er det godt eller dårligt for Europas industri?
Surely there can be nothing wrong in two European car makers which clearly cover a particular sector, albeit complementing each other, striving for a merger.
Jeg håber, at jeg dermed er kommet ind på de væsentlige spørgsmål.
So where is there such an ideal grouping, which - moreover - brings together two European firms?
Jeg vil gerne takke ordføreren.
Surely that cannot be the result of this debate!
Helt til slut en bemærkning møntet på Alan Donnelly.
I see you arc looking contemplative, so I shall sit down.
Bangemann, næstformand i Kommissionen. - (EN) Hr. formand, det første spørgsmål af hr. Donnelly og det sidste af fru Crawley handler i nogen grad begge om, hvordan Honda blev behandlet. Som jeg tidligere har
Bangemann, Vice-President of the Commission. - Mr President, the first question by Mr Donnelly and the last by Mrs Crawley are more or less making the same point about how Honda was treated.
Read (PSE), ordfører. - (EN) Hr. formand, tak, fordi De lod mig få ordet igen.
Read (PSE), rapporteur. - Mr President, thank you for letting me come back.
Hvis De søger et objektivt barometer for at måle det, må vi konstatere, at kursen på BMW-aktiersteg betydeligt. Der er naturligvis også forventninger med i spillet - men dette viser, at der hersker en vis forventning om økonomisk succes.
This is a fascinating and essential debate and I thank the Commissioner for the frankness with which he has responded.
Jeg ved ikke, om general direktøren for Honda, der blev citeret af fru Crawley, ville have sagt, at det er en trist historie for Storbritannien, at det mister sin sidste store bilfabrik, hvis han selv havde overtaget Rover.
One thing is certain; the continuation of this practice will provide maximum support for the smooth, rapid finalization of issues which are the subject of the codecision procedure.
Det forholder sig ikke sådan, at britiske medlemmer eller andre her, som deler denne bekymring, er sentimentale eller nationalister eller'tilbageskuende.
It is not that British Members, or others here who share this concern, are sentimental or nationalist or backwardlooking.
BMW's overtagelse af Rover kaster nyt lys over handelen mellem Rover og British Aerospace, i anledning af hvilken Europa-Parlamentet med rette gav udtryk for betydelig bekymring.
The takeover of Rover by BMW throws a fresh light on the Rover-British Aerospace deal, over which this Parliament legitimately expressed a great deal of concern.
Vi ønsker ikke at være sentimentale, men at se fremtiden i møde og at behandle punkterne i min betænk ning.
We do not want to be sentimental, but to look forward to the future and take up the points in my report.
Dette er ikke blot et spørgsmål om konkurrencepolitik, og det viser, at alle de punkter, som forskellige medlemmer af Parlamentet har rejst med hensyn til rettighederne til at blive hørt, regionalpolitik og industri politik, er relevante.
This is not just a matter of competition policy, and shows that all the points that various Members of this House have raised about the rights to consultation, regional policy, and industrial policy are relevant.
Hvordan vil Rovers og BMW's skæbne blive i fremtiden?
Secondly, this Commission proposal represents another, second attempt to amend Directive 189/83.
Hvilke politikker findes der allerede i EU, og hvilke politikker bør Europa-Parlamentet og Kommissionen argumentere for med henblik på at sikre fair konkurrence og fair behandling af de mennesker, der arbejder i disse virksomheder og i de mange andre industrier, der er afhængige af den?
It is selfevident that the continuous amendment of technical guidelines, such as the one under discussion today, could lead to a lack of transparency, a dearth of clarity, and confusion.
Mit spørgsmål er: hvad ville generaldirektøren for Honda have sagt, hvis han selv havde overtaget Rover, og en eller anden havde spurgt ham, om han ikke syntes, det var en trist historie, at Storbritannien nu mistede sin sidste bilfabrik?
Moreover, they raise the issue of providing timely and responsible information for those who have an interest in the matter, especially companies and national administrations.
Hvis man anskuer det på en sentimental måde. kan jeg godt forstå, at visse briter er skuffede.
In these cases, there is an urgent need for codification, taking the form of a single, complete text which will incorporate all the amendments in a clear manner.
Men det er ikke den måde, vi bør anskue det på.
This would be an important service which we ought to offer the citizens and consumers of Europe.