natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det er under afstemningen, det skal konstateres, om der er flertal, og det er under denne afstemning, at det blev slået fast, at der var et tilstrækkeligt flertal.
It is when the vote is taken that the majority has to be established, and the majority was established at that point and easily obtained.
Jeg sagde også til Dem, at jeg ville forelægge dette spørgsmål for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet.
I also told you that I would refer the matter to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure.
De har sendt mig et brev, som jeg vil videregive til Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet for at få en endelig fortolkning.
You wrote me a letter which I shall forward to the Rules Committee in order to have a definitive interpretation.
I øjeblikket betragter jeg disse paragraffer som vedtaget i henhold til min for tolkning, der kan opfattes som rigtig eller forkert, af den daværende afstemning.
For the moment, these parts of the text are deemed to have been adopted in accordance with my interpretation of the vote at the time, right or wrong.
De er følgelig vedtaget.
They therefore stand adopted.
Teksten er blevet sendt til Rådet, som for øvrigt har taget den til efterretning under Det Europæiske Råds møde i Wien.
The text has been forwarded to the Council, which moreover has just taken note of it at the European Council meeting in Vienna.
Men Deres skriftlige protest bliver sendt til Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet så snart som muligt, således at det kan under søge Deres fortolkning.
However, your written pro­test will be forwarded to the Rules Committee without de­lay, so that it can consider this interpretation.
van Putten (PSE). - (NL) Hr. formand, jeg taler kun om medlemmernes sikkerhed, og jeg har en advarsel.
van Putten (PSE). ­ (NL) Mr President, I am very con­cerned about Members' safety and there is something I would like to warn you about.
Jeg har været udsat for følgende i Bruxelles: Jeg havde en gruppe besøgende med en fredag i LEO-bygningen på femte sal, og pludselig lugtede flere af os uafhængigt af hinanden røg.
One Friday in Brussels, I had a group of visitors on the fifth floor of the LEO build­ing, and at a certain point several people said that they could smell burning.
Ved at telefonere fra den ene tjeneste til den anden varede det ca. 20 minutter, før der blev sat en alarmering i gang.
It took 20 minutes of telephoning around the various services before any alarm was sounded.
Jeg tror, at hvis der virkelig udbryder brand i denne bygning, at det så er for sent.
If there really was a fire in the building, this would be far too long.
Vil De lade sikker hedstjenesterne i Bruxelles gennemføre nogle afprøvninger for at undersøge, om medlemmernes sikkerhed ikke står på spil i den slags situationer?
Would you ask the security serv­ices in Brussels to carry out tests to see whether Members would be in danger in that sort of situation?
Nu var der ikke ud brudt brand, men det var vi ikke klar over..
There was not a fire on that particular occasion, but we were not to know that.
Eisma (ELDR). - (NL) Hr. formand, jeg har allerede tid ligere anmodet Dem om at få forholdene for cykelparkering i Parlamentets bygninger forbedret, f.eks. ved at afstå en parkeringsplads i garageanlægget.
Eisma (ELDR). ­ (NL) Mr President, I asked you last time to consider improving the bicycle facilities in this building, such as by allocating one car­parking space in the covered car park for bicycles.
Jeg har endnu ikke modtaget Deres svar, på trods af at den, der indtog Deres plads, lovede mig at se nærmere på sagen.
I have not had any reply from you, although the President at the time assured me she would look into the matter.
Må jeg på ny spørge Dem: Vil De forbedre de forhold, som jeg sidste gang anmodede om, så cyklisterne ikke altid forbigås til fordel for bilisterne?
Γ would therefore ask you again, as I did last time, to ensure that improvements are made so that cyclists do not always have to take second place to car­drivers.
Sløjf en af parkeringspladserne til biler, så cyklisterne får mere plads til at henstille deres cykler på et tørt sted.
Set one car­parking space aside so that cyclists have more room to store their bicycles out of the rain.
Jeg vil undersøge, hvad der er sket, og hvorfor De ikke har modtaget et svar.
I shall investigate what exactly happened and why no re­ply has been forthcoming.
Men det skal De nok få.
Rest assured that you will re­ceive a reply in due course.
Vi noterer os Deres kommentar og vil spørge Sikkerhedstjenesten derom.
Your comments have been noted and will be pursued with the security services.
Indtil videre har erfaringen vist, at man plejer at være paralyseret i tyve minutter, hvilket er den tid, elevatorerne ikke fungerer, når der er en alarm.
To date, what seems to happen is that nobody can do anything for 20 minutes because the lifts stop working during an alarm.
Men denne sag er anderledes, og vi vil finde ud af, hvad der er sket.
However, the occasion you have referred to is different and we shall investigate ex­actly what happened.
De vil blive underrettet om resultatet af undersøgelsen.
You will be informed of the result of the investigation.
Kan De fortælle mig, i hvilken forbindelse dette besøg finder sted og af hvilken grund?
May I ask in what context and on what grounds this visit is taking place?
Arbejdsplan
J. Agenda
Formanden. - Næste punkt på dagsordenen er fastsættelse af arbejdsplanen.
President ­ The next item is the order of business.
Det endelige forslag til dagsorden, som det blev opstillet af Formandskonferencen i overensstemmelse med forretningsordenens artikel 95, er omdelt. Der er foreslået eller foretaget følgende ændringer:
The final version of the draft agenda as drawn up by the Conference of Presidents pursuant to Rule 95 of the Rules of Procedure has been distributed, to which the following amendments have been proposed:
Formanden for senatet, hr. Zaldivar, har levet i eksil i mange år, netop fordi han ikke støttede general Pinochets statskup.
The President of the Senate, Mr Zaldivar, was exiled for many years precisely because he did not support the coup d'état by General Pinochet.
Han aflægger ligesom alle andre kammerformænd besøg hos mig.
He is coming here to visit me, like any other Speaker of a parliament.
Jeg kender dog ikke grunden til hans besøg.
I do not know the rea­son for his visit.
Det spørger jeg ikke kammerformændene om.
That is not something that I ask other Speakers.
Jeg har Parlamentets resolution.
I have Parliament's resolution.
Det var let at give ham et svar, for Parlamentet har allerede taget beslutnin ger på dette område.
It was easy to reply to him, because Parliament has already adopted res­olutions on the subject.
Mandag: ingen ændringer.
Monday: no change Tuesday:
') Anmodning om ophævelse af hr. Trakatellis parlamentariske immunitet - Udvalgenes og delegationernes sammensætning - Modtagne dokumenter - Udvalgshenvisninger - Tilladelse til at udarbejde betænkninger- Bevillingsoverførsler-Andragender: se protokollen.
') Request for the waiver of Mr Trakatellis's immunity ­ Membership of committees and parliamentary delegations ­ Documents received ­ Referral to committee ­ authorisation to draw up reports ­ Transfer of appropriations ­ Petitions: see Minutes.
Janssen van Raay (UPE). - (NL) Hr. formand, jeg har et reelt punkt til forretningsordenen baseret på forretningsordenens artikel 2, 5 og 119.
Janssen van Raay (UPE). ­ (NL) Mr President, I have a point of order based on Rules 2,5 and 119 of the Rules of Procedure.
Det vil glæde hr. Falconer, hr. Balfe og deres åndsfæller, at jeg har modtaget en juridisk udtalelse med opfordring til at indbringe Præsidiets
Messrs Falconer, Balfe and other like­minded Members will be pleased to hear that I have taken legal advice and that I intend to apply to the Court of First In­stance to have the Bureau's decision of 15 and 16 Decem­ber 1997 annulled, in accordance with the Beate Weber procedure.
Formanden. - Ønsker nogen at tale for forslaget?
Elles (PPE), rapporteur. - Mr President, I must admit that events in the last few days have been totally unpredictable so far as the 1996 discharge report is concerned.
Lulling (PPE). - (FR) Hr. formand, jeg foreslår Dem at lave en lille ændring tirsdag.
missioners, this does not make much sense.
Da det drejer sig om en andenbehandling, anmoder jeg om at få min betænkning behandlet før betænkningen af Souchet.
As this con cerns the second reading, I would like my report to be taken before the Souchet report.
Det vil kun tage fem minutter.
It will take five minutes.
Det er en bedre løsning, da fiskerikollegerne så ikke behøver at vente.
That is a better solution, because our fisheries colleagues will not have to wait.
Jeg beder Dem således om at foretage denne lille ændring, som hr. kommissær de Silguy ögså ønsker.
So I would ask you to make this small change, which would also be appreciated by Com missioner de Silguy.
Elles (PPE), ordfører. - (EN) Hr. formand, jeg må ind rømme, at det har været svært at forudsige begivenheder nes gang de sidste par dage for så vidt angår betænkningen om decharge for 1996. Jeg regnede egentlig med, at 1996- budgettet var vigtigere end decharge, men de sidste dage har vist noget andet.
What we have heard this afternoon from Mr Fabre-Aubrespy is correct. We now have a report which is ex tremely tough on the whole question of management of the 1996 discharge and yet a very narrow majority, achieved by our Socialist Labour colleagues when one of us happened to leave, means that we are now facing acceptance rather than rejection or refusal to grant.
Formanden. - Fru Lulling, jeg ville gerne have gjort dette, men som De ved, hvis dagsordenen skal ændres, skal en politisk gruppe eller 29 parlamentsmedlemmer anmode herom en time, før mødet begynder.
President. -1 would gladly do that, Mrs Lulling, but you know that amendments to the agenda must be proposed by a political group or 29 Members one hour before the opening of the sitting.
Jeg har ikke modtaget et sådant forslag, medmindre jeg har taget fejl.
Unless I am mistaken, I have not received such a request.
Men jeg ser, at fru Oomen-Ruijten beder om ordet. Det får hun hermed.
But I see that Mrs Oomen-Ru-ijten is asking for the floor.
Det, vi har hørt her i eftermiddag fra hr. Fabre-Aubrespy, er sandt. Vi har nu en betænkning, som er meget kritisk, hvad angår hele spørgsmålet om håndteringen af de charge for 1996, men stadig betyder et snævert flertal, op nået af vores socialdemokratiske Labour-kolleger, da en af os tilfældigvis forlod salen, at vi nu står foran en ved tagelse af decharge i stedet for en forkastelse.
In the light of the fact that we also have an unprecedented ruling that we now have to apply the Rules of Procedure in our vote rather than the Treaty, I suggest that we refer this report back to committee and bring it to our next partsession.
Oomen-Ruijten (PPE). - (NL) Hr. formand, vi har over set denne sag, og det undskylder jeg meget.
Oomen-Ruijten (PPE). - (NL) Mr President, this is something we overlooked, for which I sincerely apologise.
Men jeg mener, at fru Lullings forslag er meget rimeligt.
I think Mrs Lulling's request is entirely reasonable.
Hun har en betænkning, som det tager ca. 10 minutter at behandle, og jeg mener, at det er vigtigt at skubbe den lidt frem.
Her report would take perhaps ten minutes to discuss, and I think it is important to bring it forward.
Jeg har set på kollegernes ansigtsudtryk på den anden side og også på fru Green, at man ikke har noget imod dette.
I gather from the expressions of colleagues on the other side of the Chamber, particularly Mrs Green, that they would not object to this.
Lige nu er sammenhængen meget ulogisk.
Things as they stand are organised very illogically.
Formanden. - Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, vil jeg sætte fru Lullings forslag under afstemning.
President - If there are no objections, I shall put the re quest by Mrs Lulling to the vote.
Lord Tomlinson (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne modsætte mig hr. Fabre-Aubrespys forslag.
Tomlinson, The Lord (PSE). - Mr President, I should like to oppose Mr Fabre-Aubrespy's motion.
Endnu en gang har han vist, at han er en dårlig taber.
Once again he has demonstrated that he is a bad loser.
Så vidt jeg ved, er et lille flertal stadig et flertal.
I have never known a 14/13 vote to be an unacceptable majority.
Han påstår, at vi havde nye oplysninger, men vi har over hovedet ikke fået nye oplysninger fra Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet.
When he says we had new information, we have had no new information at all from the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities.
Det eneste, vi har fået, er en genbekræftelse af den nuværende forretningsorden.
All we have had is a reaffirmation of the existing Rules.
Fabre-Aubrespy (I-EDN). - (FR) Hr. formand, i forbindelse med dagsordenen for tirsdag anmoder jeg herved på vegne af vores gruppe og i henhold til artikel 129 ikke om en ændring, men om at betænkningen af Elles om de charge til Kommissionen for 1996 henvises til fornyet ud valgsbehandling.
Fabre-Aubrespy (I-EDN). - (FR) Mr President, I am not asking for a change to Tuesday's agenda but, on behalf of our group and pursuant to Rule 129,1 call for the Elles re port on discharge for 1996 to be referred back to commit tee.
Betænkningen blev faktisk behandlet forleden i Budgetkontroludvalget, og det vigtigste stykke, som giver decharge, blev vedtaget med 14 stemmer for og 13 imod, selvom der allerede havde været afstemning om dette spørgsmål.
The Committee on Budgetary Control considered the report the other day and the essential paragraph, which grants discharge, was passed by 14 votes to 13, when there had already been a vote on this issue.
I udvalget havde vi en meget grundig debat.
In committee we had a very thorough debate.
Som hr. Elles så rigtigt siger, kommer vi med hård kritik.
As Mr Elles rightly says, we make some very tough criticisms.
Men vi er ofte kommet med hård kritik af Kommissionen uden at nægte dem decharge.
But we have often made tough criticisms of the Commission without refusing them discharge.
På et tidspunkt bad vi om udsættelse af de charge, men siden da har vi set en forbedring af Kommissionens holdning.
At one stage we asked for a deferment of discharge but^since then we have had an improvement in the Commission's position.
Der er dog stadig lang vej tilbage, men på baggrund af udvalgets flertal er der nu tilstrækkeligt grundlag for, at vi stadig kan give decharge.
I have to say that it still has some way to go, but there are sufficient grounds for progress, in the view of the majority of the committee, for us still to go ahead and grant discharge.
Jeg håber, at vi nu vil forkaste hr. Fabre-Aubrespys for slag, efter at have drøftet dette i sin helhed i udvalget.
I hope that now we will reject Mr Fabre-Aubrespy's motion, having had this fully debated in the committee.
Jeg kan se, at formanden for udvalget gerne vil have ordet, men formanden er partisk i denne sag, eftersom hun selv har fremsat et ændringsforslag om nægtelse af decharge.
I see that the chairman has asked for the floor but the chairman is a very partial person in this question, having herself tabled an amendment to reject.
Som den foreligger indeholder betænkningen åbenbare selvmodsigelser.
The report as it stands contains glaring contradictions.
Således ville forslag g), i) og j) normalt føre til, at der ikke gives decharge.
Recitals g), I) and j) would normally imply refusal of dis charge.
Det samme gælder f.eks.artikel 5 og flere andre artikler i betænkningen.
The same applies to Article 5, for example, and to several others in the decision.
Den sidste artikel, som giver decharge, viser sig således at være i strid med resten af betænkningen, en selvmodsigelse, som ikke kan løses, da vi lige har fået at vide, at Ud valget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Med lemmernes Immunitet har foreslået Parlamentet ikke at acceptere ændringsforslagene til beslutningen om at give decharge. Hvis medlemmerne af Budgetkontroludvalget
The final article, granting discharge, contradicts the rest of the resolution, and it will not be possible to remove this contradiction because we have just learned that the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities is going to propose that Parliament reject the amendments to the discharge decision.
Formanden. - Formanden har ifølge artikel 126 ret til at udtrykke sin holdning.
President - The chairman is entitled to express an opin ion under Rule 126.
Ved forkastelse henvises spørgsmålet til fornyet udvalgs behandling.
Theato rejection, the matter shall be referred back to the commit tee.'
Det vil sige, at når fortolkningen fra Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmer nes Immunitet, som jeg endnu ikke selv kender, foreligger, vil den blive behandlet på plenarmødet.
This means that as soon as we have the interpretation by the Committee on the Rules of Procedure - which I do not yet know myself- it will be read out to the House.
Men jeg vil gerne sige, at så vidt jeg har forstået, skal trak taten, set fra min side, have højeste prioritet.
However, I should also like to say that as I have under stood it, the Treaty ought nevertheless to take precedence.
Men denne sag er endnu ikke afgjort.
The matter has not been settled yet.
De vil få forklaret, om disse ting er forenelige eller ej. Jeg vil ikke tale om decharge eller ikke decharge nu, heller ikke selvom lord Tomlinson har henvist til det.
It will be explained to you how far these matters are or are not compatible.
Jeg vil bare sige, at jeg naturligvis også er medlem af Europa-Parlamentet og dermed også frit kan afgøre, hvordan jeg stemmer eller ikke stemmer.
I only want to say that as a Member of the Eu ropean Parliament, I am of course free to decide how I do or do not vote.
Alle vil få teksten udleveret i god tid før behandlingen, så ledes at de kan udøve den ret, der er nævnt i punkt 4 i ar tikel 162.
Everyone will have the text sufficiently far in advance to be able to exercise the right provided for in Rule 162(4).
En gruppe kan altså anmode om, at denne for tolkning forkastes ved at gøre indsigelse.
By contesting the interpretation, therefore, a group can ask for it to be rejected.
Parlamentet vil stemme og tage beslutning, efter at alle har fået tid til at læse fortolkningen og besluttet, om de vil gøre indsigelse eller ej.
Parliament will vote and take its decision after everyone has had time to read the interpretation and decided whether or not to contest it.
Formanden. - Jeg sætter forslaget om henvisning til for nyet udvalgsbehandling af Ellesbetænkningen under af stemning.
President -1 put the request for the Elles report to be re ferred back to committee to the vote.
Aelvoet (V). - (NL) Hr. formand, sidste torsdag eftermiddag blev det på Formandskonferencen meddelt, at resultatet af drøftelserne i Udvalget for Forretningsordenen onsdag eftermiddag ville blive forelagt Formandskonferencen for at undgå, at man kom ud i en endeløs proceduredebat.
Aelvoet (V). - (NL) Mr President, last Thursday after noon the Conference of Presidents was told that it would be informed of the results of the discussion in the Com mittee on the Rules of Procedure on Wednesday after noon, to prevent us from having to have an endless proce dural debate here.
Jeg spørger Dem, hvordan har man tænkt sig at knytte de to elementer sammen.
I would like to ask you how these two things can now be reconciled.
For det første så jeg helst ikke, at der i morgen tidlig klokken 9.00 foreligger en tekst, som grupperne ikke kender, og som de ikke har kunnet undersøge nærmere og sammenligne med udtalelser fra andre grupper, fordi det her drejer sig om et meget grundlæggende problem.
First of all, I would not like Us to arrive here at 9 a.m. tomorrow morning to find a document that the groups have not had a chance to read, study and compare with statements by other groups, be cause the problem at issue here is an extremely serious one.
For det andet ønsker jeg, at op bygningen af aftaler i Parlamentet skal være konsekvent.
Secondly, I think we must be logical in the order in which agreements are reached here in the House.
Hvis man siger, at sagen undersøges af Formandskonferencen, så kan afstemningen herom ikke finde sted i plenarforsamlingen forinden.
If the matter is to be examined in the Conference of Presidents, then we cannot have a vote on it here in the plenary before that.
Muller (V). - (DE) Hr. formand, ja, jeg kan jo også tabe, Joan Colom.
Müller (V). - (DE) Mr President, I should like to tell Mr Colom i Naval that I do indeed know how to lose.
Det er slet ikke mit problem i øjeblikket, da det jo vil vise sig på torsdag.
But that is not by any means my problem at the moment, because we will certainly know one way or the other on Thursday.
Mit spørgsmål til formanden er: Hvornår har medlemmerne af Budgetudvalget lejlighed til at reflektere over resultatet fra Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet?
My question to the President is about when the members of the Committee on Budgetary Control will have the op portunity to reflect upon the findings of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities.
Vi har naturligvis fældet vores dom med en vis usikkerhed.
A certain insecurity did of course prevail when we pronounced our opinion.
Derfor beder jeg Dem udfærdige et procedureforslag til os, da det fra mit synspunkt ikke kan gå an, at vi accepterer vurderingen fra Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet i procedurespørgsmål uden en meningsudveksling.
That is why I would ask you to make some suggestion as to procedure, be cause in my view we simply cannot accept the opinion of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure on the subject without an exchange of views.
Jeg spørger Dem altså, hvornår er der en meningsudveksling om proceduren?
That is why I would ask you when there is going to be a discussion on procedure.
Formanden. - Fru Aelvoet, Formandskonferencen er ikke kompetent til at fortolke forretningsordenen.
President - Mrs Aelvoet, the Conference of Presidents is not competent to interpret the Rules of Procedure.
Der er en bestemmelse i selve forretningsordenen, som jeg lige har læst for dem.
There is a system, laid down by the Rules themselves, which I have just read out.
Så snart jeg har fået fortolkningen, vil den blive meddelt på plenarmødet, og jeg skal sørge for, at teksten til fortolkningen straks sendes til alle grupper.
As soon as I have the interpretation, it will be announced to the House and I will ensure that the text is sent immediately to all the groups.
Hvad enten den offentliggøres i aften eller i morgen kl. 9, vil De få mindst tre timer før afstemningen til at udforme en indsigelse mod fortolkningen.
Whether the an nouncement is made this evening or at 9 a.m. tomorrow, you will have at least three hours before the vote in which to decide whether to contest this interpretation.
Det fremgår af punkt 4 i artikel 162.
Those are the terms of Rule 162(4)
Formanden. - Fru Müller, Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet vil foreslå en fortolkning, hvilket er det, Budgetkontroludvalget har anmodet om.
President - Mrs Müller, the Committee on the Rules of Procedure will put forward an interpretation, which is what the Committee on Budgetary Control requested.
Denne fortolkning vil blive sat under afstemning på plenarmødet uden forhandling.
This interpretation will be put to the vote in the House without a debate.
Jeg håber, at afstemningen kan finde sted sidst på formiddagen i morgen.
I hope that it will be possible to vote to morrow, at the end of the morning sitting.
Fortolkningen vil naturligvis blive læst op på plenarmødet.
The interpreta tion will naturally be read out to the House.
Proceduren er fastlagt i forretningsordenen: Fortolkningen læses op, hvorefter den enten vedtages eller forkastes.
This is the system laid down in the Rules of Procedure: the interpretation is to be read out and it will then either be adopted or rejected.