natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Minoriteters rettigheder, strømmen af asylansøgere, de »illegale indvandreres« situation får Europa til at fremstå som en permanent byggeplads og et område, hvor respekten for menneskerettighederne bør sikres.
Racism is a crime and, without losing sight of that fact, the Member States need to strengthen their laws to combat all types of racist acts or statements.
Schaffner (UPE). - (FR) Hr. formand, når man læser fru Paillers betænkning om menneskerettighederne i Den Europæiske Union, fyldes man uundgåligt af to modsatte følelser: en beundring for det udførte arbejde og samtidig en harme over denne opremsning af floskler.
It is often said that unemployment and economic crisis are the very worst conditions for fostering racism and xenophobia, and that is not un true.
På dette område skal Europa stræbe efter at fremstå som ulastelig, for det er ikke tilstrækkeligt at tilføje en klausul om respekt for menneskerettighederne i alle aftaler mellem Den Europæiske Union og tredjelande. Unionen, der er ivrig efter at tilføje en sådan klausul i aftalerne, må først udvise korrekt adfærd inden for egne grænser.
Nevertheless, until citizens of the European Union start emigrating to Algeria, Cuba or Afghanistan, while our Member States remain the object of so many requests for asylum and while they have to protect themselves against such high levels of illegal immigration, I remain reassured about our record!
Hvem tør således uden at blinke erklære, at han er imod en fuldstændig respekt for menneskerettighederne, at Den Europæiske Union og hermed medlemsstaterne skal over
Goerens (ELDR). - (FR) Mr President, ladies and gen tlemen, the European Year against Racism was another
De liberale har altid været tilhængere af en meget bred de bat om indføjelsen af anden og tredje generations menne-
Finally, I should like to draw attention to the novel suggestion Mrs Pailler makes in her report: that the European Parliament itself could act against any Members who pro mote racism or xenophobia in any way.
Goerens skerettigheder i betænkningerne om menneskerettighederne.
Certainly human rights, the definition of which everyone is agreed upon, must be pro moted and we should all be amongst the first to fight to have them respected.
er ikke stabilt hos os. Det har fået revner.
What we need is a renaissance of fundamental rights, of human rights here in the European Union.
Det er blevet ustabilt.
In practice, we are living in an era in which democratic processes and solidarity are dwindling.
Så meget desto vigtigere er derfor den årlige be tænkning, så meget desto mere uforståelig er den allerede traditionelle ideologiske debat om definitionen af menne skerettighederne og det stadig tilbagevendende forsøg på at halvere dem, udvande og relativere dem.
So the annual re port on human rights is all the more important, and it is all the more easy to understand the reasons for what has now become a traditional ideological debate on the definition of human rights and the repeated attempts to reduce, di minish, and relativize it.
På dette område er Unionen kun troværdig i den udstrækning, den accepterer at være selvkritisk.
It is on this basis that we will be able to witness the development of a harmonious society. The right to live in dignity is a very strict minimum.
Således er de kontrol- og følgemekanismer med hensyn til menneske rettighederne, der er iværksat af Europarådet, en stadig opfordring til årvågenhed fra medlemsstaternes og bor gernes side.
Buffetaut (I-EDN). - (FR) Mr President, the annual re port on respect for human rights in the European Union is a ritual to which all members of this House must be able to sacrifice without hesitation, in particular we French, since it was a Frenchman, King Louis XVI, who was the first European to promulgate a declaration of the rights of man and citizen.
Det er ved at se på vilkårene for de svage, de udstødte, de mest udsatte medlemmer af vores samfund, at man kan måle vores vilje til at respektere menneskerettighederne.
Unfortunately, after reading what has been submitted to us, we can but remain sceptical.
Set fra denne synsvinkel har fru Pailler udført et glimrende arbejde, der fortjener vores fulde opmærksomhed.
Is it a text on respect for human rights or a political manifesto from a member of the French Communist Party?
En betænkning om menneskerettigheder skal tage stilling til den usminkede virkelighed og intet andet! Jeg ville virkelig ønske, at kristelig-demokratiske kolleger som hr. Pirker husker på, hvad de store kirker kræver som en ret, som en grundlæggende rettighed.
A report on human rights has to deal with the unvarnished truth and nothing else.
De kræver ret til ar bejde, ret til et værdigt arbejde.
They de mand the right to work, the right to dignified work.
De kræver retfærdighed i et samfund, som skal omfatte en retfærdig fordeling og en retfærdig deltagelse.
They call for justice in society, justice as regards equitable distribution of wealth and holding a stake in society.
En stat, der fratager hjemløse valg retten, det vil sige retten til medbestemmelse, fratager dem samtidig retten til menneskeværdighed, for en væsentlig bestanddel af den demokratiske tanke er jo netop, at retten til medbestemmelse ikke knyttes til noget andet kriterium end det blot at være menneske, altså ikke til køn, hudfarve eller indestående på en bankkonto.
A state which refuses the homeless the right to vote and the right to have a say, is refusing them the right to human dignity, since an important part of the concept of democracy is that the right to share in decisionmaking is not linked to any other criterion except that of simply being a human being - it has nothing to do with gender, skin colour or how much money you have in the bank.
Mohamed Ali (GUE/NGL). - (ES) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne først og fremmest lykønske ordføreren med hendes fremragende betænkning og give udtryk for min fulde støtte til samtlige de forslag, der er indeholdt heri.
Mrs Pallier insists on economic and social rights but is strangely silent on the right to institute proceedings and the right to property, which are nevertheless fundamental in the fight against poverty and exclusion.
Rettigheder skal være til, for at de kan anvendes.
Rights are there to be exercised.
Det er en kynisk fordrejning at tale om misbrug af rettigheder og bringe anvendelsen i vanry som misbrug.
It is a cynical distortion to talk about the misuse of rights and to attack exercising rights as misuse.
Det såkaldte misbrug er inde i en inflation, såkaldt asylmisbrug, så kaldt misbrug af sociale ydelser, journalisters såkaldte misbrug af retten til at nægte at vidne. Hr. Pirker taler jo også allerede om misbrug i Europaparlamentet, når vi ta ler om menneskerettigheder.
We hear the word 'misuse' everywhere - .misuse' of the right to asylum, 'misuse' of social pro tection, 'misuse' of journalists' right not to reveal their sources.
Racisme er en forbrydelse, og det er, uden at tabe denne på stand af syne, nødvendigt, at man i medlemsstaterne skærper lovene for at bekæmpe enhver form for racistiske handlinger eller erklæringer. Man plejer at sige, at ar bejdsløsheden og den økonomiske krise er den bedste næringsvæske for racisme og racehad, og det er ikke forkert.
That said, apart from the articles concerning children's rights, which can be unreservedly supported, and a certain number of articles on freedom of expression and individual freedoms, the report which has been submitted to us is more or less composed of largely tendentious ideological affirmations, with a strong hint of Marxism-Leninism,...
Ergo må det dreje sig om, at anvendelsen af rettigheder garanteres i stedet for at bringe det såkaldte misbrug i vanry.
So we must ensure that we guarantee the freedom to ex ercise rights instead of attacking 'misuse'.
Det har noget med demokrati at gøre.
That is what democracy is all about.
Hr. formand, jeg har ikke tid til at nævne enkelttilfælde.
I do not have enough time to men tion individual cases, Mr President.
Jeg ville gerne have talt om Østrig og diskriminering af homoseksuelle.
I would have liked to talk about Austria and discrimination against homosexuals.
Jeg ville gerne have talt om Tyskland og atter Tyskland og den menneskeforagtende behandling af flygtninge i Tyskland.
I would have liked to talk about Germany and the con temptuous treatment of refugees in that country.
Det er dét, der er meningen med en betænkning om menneskerettigheder og ikke at opstille potemkinkulisser.
That is what a human rights report should be about, not about constructing an empty façade.
Mange tak, og tak til Aline!
Thank you very much, and thank you, Aline!
Men vi må understrege det essentielle i økonomiske og sociale rettigheder.
... a criminal ideology responsible for more than 100 million deaths in Europe since 1917.
Det er uanstændigt at bruge ordførerens tilhørsforhold til en be stemt gruppe som påskud for at drage indholdet i de punkter, der omhandler disse rettigheder, i tvivl.
Under these conditions, it is clear that it will be impossible for us to vote for the majority of the articles in this report, which mix political affirmation with true questions regarding human rights.
Fundamentet for menneskerettighederne
(Applause from the left)
Pradier af rettigheder, at udarbejde den årlige betænkning om menneskerettigheder.
On the other hand, we will support the UPE and PPE amendments.
Det er fra dette udgangspunkt, vi vil se et harmonisk samfund udvikle sig. Retten til et værdigt liv er et ab solut minimum.
In conclusion, we consider that such a text, far from con firming the European Parliament's role as vigilant guard ian of human rights, can only give an image of an irresponsible House which tragically lacks gravity.
Således gives lektionen i menneskerettigheder af en repræsentant for et system, der samtykkede i fængslingen af Solsjenitsyn, i at grænsevagterne skød på de berlinere, der flygtede fra det sovjetiske paradis og i den militære invasion af Afghanistan. Og det franske kommunistparti angrer ikke.
It is unfortunate and disgraceful, I also have to say, that year after year we differ in our opinion on the definition of the term human rights. I think it is therefore good that the committee I chair has decided to start next year by agreeing a definition, since a new generation of human rights is to be presented in June.
Buffetaut (I-EDN). - (FR) Hr. formand, den årlige be tænkning om respekten for menneskerettighederne i Unionen er et ritual alle medlemmer af dette Parlament uden tøven burde deltage i, og især vi franskmænd, eftersom det var en franskmand, Ludvig XVI, der, som den første europæer, bekendtgjorde en menneske- og borgerrettighedserklæring.
Le Gallou (NI). - (FR) Mr President, the symbolism is strong, and as my colleague, Mr Buffetaut, has high lighted, it is scandalous. Our Parliament made Mrs Pailler responsible for the annual report on human rights, an elected communist, elected to the French Communist Party's list, a party which continues to hold a Marxist definition of rights.
Desværre kan det ikke undgås, at man bliver skeptisk, når man læser betænkningen, der er forelagt os. Drejer det sig om en tekst om respekt for menneskerettigheder, eller er det et politisk manifest fra en af det kommunistiske partis følgesvende?
But before then, I would like to advise everyone to have a good look at chapters such as those on asylum and migration, and to have a good look at the chapters devoted to racism and xenophobia.
Kære kolleger, vi er altså i dag i gang med en debat, der er Orwells roman »1984« værdig.
Thus, ladies and gentlemen, we are today in the middle of a debate worthy of George Orwell's novel, '1984'.
Vi befinder os i en Orwellsk logik, hvor sandhed er løgn, for under dække af at forsvare menneskerettighederne, drejer det sig i virkelig heden om at fratage politiske modstandere deres ytringsfrihed.
We are in an Orwellian logic where truth is lies for, under the pretence of defending human rights, the issue is really one of depriving political adversaries of their freedom of ex pression.
Ytringsfriheden er ikke frihed til at tænke som alle andre, det er netop frihed til at tænke anderledes end an dre.
For freedom of expression is not the freedom to think as everyone else does, but the freedom to think differently from others.
Som Voltaire udtrykte det: Jeg deler ikke jeres idéer, men jeg kæmper for, at I kan udtrykke dem.
As Voltaire said, 'I do not share your ideas, but I will fight for your right to express them'.
Ligeledes drejer det sig i virkeligheden i fru Paillers be tænkning om, under dække af menneskerettigheder, at forhindre folkene i at bestemme selv ved at styre deres indvandrerpolitik.
In the case of asylum seekers, which Mrs d'Ancona has just referred to, Mrs Pailler demands that the jus soli principle should be recognized without exception as from birth, and that dual nationality should be granted.
Det betyder, at den forelagte betænkning, bortset fra punkterne om børns rettigheder, der sammen med en række punkter om ytringsfrihed og individuel frihed kan godtages uden forbehold, først og fremmest består af ideologiske erklæringer, derer mere eller mindre tendentiøse med et stærkt skær af marxisme og leninisme...
Similarly, Mrs Pallier's report, under the guise of human rights, relates, in fact, to depriving people of their right to selfdetermination by controlling their immigration policy. icy.
d'Ancona (PSE). - (NL) Hr. formand, jeg har kun et par minutter, og de minutter vil jeg derfor ikke anvende til at bruge megen tid på de triste udtalelser af hr. Buffetaut og hr. Le Gallou, der hvert år på ny anvender denne talerstol til at fornærme ordførerne i stedet for at holde sig til det, der står i betænkningen af fru Pailler.
d'Ancona (PSE). - (NL) Mr President, I only have a few minutes, so I will not devote them to the sad remarks by Mr Buffetaut and Mr Le Gallou who year after year use this platform to insult the rapporteur instead of sticking to what it says in Mrs Pailler's report.
Til gengæld støtter vi æn dringsforslagene fra UPE og PPE.
I would also like to mention economic and social rights.
Endelig mener vi, at en tekst som denne, der ikke på no gen måde fastslår Europa-Parlamentets rolle som op mærksom beskytter af menneskerettighederne, giver ind tryk af et uansvarligt Parlament, der i alvorlig grad mangler seriøsitet.
The fact that we have such a report on an annual basis is a good thing: firstly, because we want to show that we are a decent continent; secondly, because we are alert enough to point at others when their human rights policy is no good; and thirdly because, during this week of all weeks, we are not only discussing Burma, Senegal and China, which is terrible enough in itself, but because we are also looking at what is not right here, and a lot of things are not
Det er trist og beskæmmende, det må jeg også sige, at vi hvert år på ny har forskellige meninger om definitionen af menneskerettighederne.
It is easy to find fault with this criticism of the way the market economy works, but it certainly has nothing to do with human rights.
Le Gallou (NI). - (FR) Hr. formand, dette er yderst symbolsk og, som min kollega Buffetaut understregede, skandaløst.
Let us go back to human rights proper and talk, for instance, about what Mr Schulz said.
get nøje på forholdene i fængslerne, at se nærmere på kapitlerne om racisme og fremmedhad.
IN THE CHAIR: MR PODESTÀ Vice-President he mean?
Nassauer (PPE). - (DE) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, vi skal ikke gøre os nogen illusioner, denne debat er ikke flatterende for Europa-Parlamentet.
Caccavale (UPE). ­ (IT) I have to say that Mrs Pailler's report is a very broad report, too broad even, given the problems this hotchpotch and jumble of laws obviously causes, which need to be discussed together.
Det skyldes ikke, at vi er uenige om, hvorvidt vi skal stemme for eller imod en betænkning, det skyldes heller ikke, at vi ikke ville kunne nå frem til en grundlæggende enighed om menneskerettighedsspørgsmål.
I should, however, examine several important points of the report, such as those relating to the question of prisons ­ an opin­ion which I fully share ­ and that relating to the abuse of detention and the lack of equality between accusation and defence in legal proceedings: these are all points made in this report which we share.
Den findes sandsynligvis.
They have lived in Eu­rope for centuries.
Menneskerettighedsbegrebet skal heller ikke begrænses til de klassiske borgerlige frihedsrettigheder.
Nonetheless, their rights are being fla­grantly dashed to pieces still today in many states.
De to store menneskerettighedskonventioner omfatter allerede sociale rettigheder.
Their basic economic, social and cultural rights are being ig­nored.
Det ville ikke være noget problem.
I appeal to Commissioner van de Broek for greater cooperation.
Jeg vil derimod ikke tage stilling til den ideologiske debat om, hvorvidt man skal indføje andre rettigheder i denne betænkning - og dermed udvide cirklen af menneskeret tigheder - f.eks. de økonomiske og sociale rettigheder el ler de økologiske.
However, I am not going to join in the ideological debate on whether we need to include other rights in this report, extending the scope of human rights, such as economic and social or ecological rights.
Her henvender jeg mig til mine venner i PPE-gruppen for at sige, at det er ikke tidspunktet.
In this respect, I would like my friends in the People's Party to know that this is not the point.
Jeg tror, at menneskerettighederne er inde i en udviklingsproces, og at man bør modsætte sig fru Paillers udlægning, hvad f.eks. de økonomiske og sociale rettigheder angår, for de svar, hun giver her, er fuldstændig forkerte, forældede og tilhører en svunden tid.
I think that human rights are developing, and that we need to dispute the contents of Mrs Pailler's re­port: for example, in the part relating to economic and so­cial rights, the answers given by Mrs Pailler are totally wrong, obsolete and superseded by history.
At man i dag kan sige, at fattigdom er et resultat af markedspolitiken er det samme som ikke at vide, hvad virkeligheden omkring én er og modsige selve virkeligheden.
To say that poverty is the result of market policies does not take the actual facts into account and gives a contrary answer to reality itself.
Det er altså snarere på dette punkt, at vi må forene vores kræfter og gøre en indsats.
This is what we are fighting against.
Wiebenga (ELDR). - (NL) Hr. formand, jeg vil tilslutte mig dem, der finder, at det er godt, at vi her drøfter og træffer beslutninger om menneskerettighedssituationen i Den Europæiske Union.
Ulimann (V). ­ (DE) Mr President, in my country an ap­plication for asylum by a young African woman who was being threatened with sexual violence and physical muti­lation by her own family was rejected as being manifestly unfounded.
Jeg vil hertil føje: Det ville være af stor betydning, om vi her i Parlamentet kunne opnå et stort flertal på dette punkt.
In the German Länder of Β aden­Württem­berg, the practice of deportation denounced in the report before us as double punishment is universally applied, even to EU citizens.
Men med spørgsmålet om menneskerettigheder har det helt bestemt ikke det mindste at gøre.
I would like to add that it would be important if we in this House could reach a large majority on this point.
Der står efter min mening mange gode ting i betænknin gen - lad det være klart - men der er også en række for hold, der står i vejen for opnåelsen af et stort flertal.
In my view the report contains many good things ­ let there be no misunderstanding on this ­ but it also contains a few issues which stand in the way of reaching a large majority.
Jeg skal nævne et par stykker. Ikke for mange, for det er der ikke tid til.
I mention just a few, not too many, as I do not have much time.
Jeg henviser til spørgsmålene om de økonomiske og sociale rettigheder.
However, an­yone who transforms fundamental rights into privileges is simply abolishing them.
Her siger fru Pailler, at omfanget af fat tigdom i Europa gør arbejdsløsheden værre, når der sam tidig gennemføres en skrap sparepolitik.
And anyone who abolishes fun­damental rights is undermining the legal system, which is based on fundamental rights, and is shifting the responsi­bility for observing these fundamental rights, as is the case with the third country clause.
Altså arbejdsløshed som følge af sparepoIitik,"sanering af budgetterne, dét kommer De i sidste instans til at stå ret så alene med, kære fru Pailler, selvom De siger, at forarmelsesprocessen hænger direkte sammen med den måde, hvorpå økonomien fungerer.
I cannot understand why this House cannot speak with one voice in totally rejecting a policy of this kind, and I am saying that as someone who has read Solzhenitsyn and has had personal experience of the East German People's Police.
Det er for hold, der har en konstitutionel dimension i de forskellige medlemsstater, og mit spørgsmål er: Man kan vel sige, at man skal være for jus soli, men er det så en krænkelse af menneskerettighederne i 1996, for det drejer betænknin gen sig om, hvis et land har det andet system om nationalitetsret?
These are issues which have a constitutional di­mension in various Member States and my question is: we might say we are in favour of the jus soli, but is it a viola­tion of human rights in 1996, because that is the year the report covers, if one country has a different system of na­tionality right?
Svaret er naturligvis: »Nej«.
Obviously the answer is no.
Hvad mener han med det? Måske hr. van Mierts konkurrencepolitik?
Non­legalization in itself was no violation of human rights during 1996.
Så ville vi også kunne blive enige om en betænkning om menneskerettighederne.
I hope it will be possible that by amending the report we will have a decent majority.
Jeg vil imidlertid rose visse vigtige punkter i betænkningen, f.eks. dem, der ved
For example, the mistaken concept of regulated prostitu­tion, which would be a true regression for European hu­
Ojala menneskerettigheder er en slags barometer for situationen i medlemslandene.
Seillier manism, a humanism for which the body is not exterior to the person and cannot be the object of commerce and which, if it were accepted, would contribute to spreading the scourge of prostitution in all its forms.
Livet og samfundets udvikling, ethvert samfunds udvikling, afhænger af kønnenes forskellighed.
theless very important to the people affected by them and which I am delighted to find in this report.
Sigøjnere er en betydelig fælleseuropæisk minoritet. De har levet i Europa i flere hundrede år.
Secondly, the demand for civil union contracts for homosexuals.
Desuagtet krænkes deres menneskerettigheder groft endnu i dag i mange medlemslande.
Then there is paragraph 89 which spells out the problem of children who are legally resident in the European Un ion but whose parents are not EU citizens.
I deres tilfælde kniber det specielt med de økonomiske, sociale og kulturelle grundlæggende rettigheder. heder.
They often have considerable difficulties at border controls when they go on school trips and that puts them in an invidious position as compared with their classmates. That too needs to be put right.
Endelig, hvad med den mest bespottede rettighed i vores lande i øjeblikket, især i mit land i Frankrig, nemlig den ret, vi kan takke for, at vi eksisterer i dag, De og jeg, ef tersom vi har kunne nyde godt af retten til at udvikles og fødes?
Finally, where is there mention about the most scorned right in our countries, especially in my own, in France, at the moment, thanks to which we are all here, both you and I, since it was granted to all of us: the right to develop and to be born?
Ja, frue, vi så virkelig gerne, at denne betænkning havde været mindre selektiv og mere sammenhængende.
Truly, Madam, in such a report we would have liked a less selective and more coherent approach.
Det er meget beklageligt, at Europarådet og Den Europæiske Union ikke er i stand til at indføre et bedre samarbejde for at fremme sigøjnernes leveforhold.
Finally, I refer to paragraph 99 which highlights the difficulties which are often experienced by people held for long periods on remand in countries other than their own on suspicion of having committed an offence.