natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Canada kan som en civiliseret nation ikke ensidigt overtræde den internationale havret og opbringe en båd uden for 200-sømilsgrænsen.
Canada, as a civilized nation, cannot unilaterally infringe the international law of the sea. Canada, as a civilized nation, cannot seize a vessel outside the two-hundred mile limit.
Canada kan som en civiliseret nation ikke tillade sig på grund af interne politiske forhold og et forestående valg krænke den internationale havret.
Canada, as a civilized nation, cannot use its political situation and electoral processes at home as an excuse for infringing the international law of the sea.
Som kommissæren sagde, går Kommissionen, hvad angår fangst kvoten for hellefisk, ind for en nedsættelse med 60% af Den Europæiske Unions tidligere kvote, og hvis Canada havde magt som det har agt, ville der blive tale om en forøgelse på 500% af fangstkvoten for hellefisk.
Moreover, as the Commissioner has said, on the subject of the tuna quota alone, the Commission is seeking a reduction of some 60% compared with the European Union's previous catch but if Canada gets its way there will be a 500% increase in the tonnage of tuna caught.
Teverson (ELDR). — (EN) Fru formand, der er næsten fuldstændig enighed om her i Parlamentet, at dette var en ulovlig handling, en handling, vi fordømmer, og som skal gøres god igen ved at frigive fartøjet og dets kaptajn.
Teverson (ELDR). — Madam President, what unifies this House almost completely is the fact that this was an illegal act, one that we condemn and one that has to be repaired by the release of the ship and of its captain.
Jeg lykønsker kommissæren for den hurtige indgriben og for, at sagen og porteføljen forvaltes på glimrende vis.
I congratulate the Commission on being involved very quickly and mastering its brief and its portfolio very well.
Af ovennævnte grunde er jeg solidarisk med kommissærens holdning, men jeg skal dog heller ikke i fremtiden undlade at påpege og understrege disse nuancer og forskelle.
For these reasons, I support the Commissioner's position but I feel obliged nevertheless to note and emphasize these nuances and differences.
Vi står over for en situation, hvor der er enighed, navnlig i Rådet, men jeg vil gerne advare om, at hvis voldshandlingerne griber om sig, vil enigheden begynde at svækkes. Det ville være meget skammeligt.
We have here a unified situation, particularjy in the Council, but I would warn that if aggression starts rising that unity will start to weaken.
I visse kredse er der mange med kløe i aftrækkerfingeren.
There are a lot of itchy fingers on triggers at the moment amongst certain parties.
Dette er bekymringsvækkende, og vi bliver nødt til at nedtrappe problemet.
This is a worry and we need to de-escalate this problem.
Lucas Pires (PPE). — (PT) Fru formand, mine damer og herrer, historisk set blev retten til frit at besejle havene fastslået i 1609 af Hugo Grotius i Mare Liberum, og jeg er ikke tilbøjelig til at mene, at vi efter så mange århundreder er indstillet på at sætte uret tilbage.
Lucas Pires (PPE). — (PT) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, historically, the theory of the freedom of the seas was first propounded by Hugo Grotius in his treatise Mare Liberum published in 1609 but he would not have thought that we should still have wanted to turn the clock back after so many centuries.
Der er primært tale om et skænderi mellem venner.
It is primarily an argument between friends.
Den Europæiske Union og Canada har samarbejdet på mange områder.
The European Union and Canada have worked together in many areas.
Vi har en fælles kultur og fælles værdier, og navnlig i forhold til Frankrig og Storbritannien, en fælles historie.
We have a shared culture and shared values and, particularly with France and Britain, a shared history.
Canada er medlem af NATO og andre internationale organisationer.
Canada operates within NATO and other international organizations.
Dette betyder, at vi må løse konflikten gennem forhandlinger, måske bliver det vanskelige, men målrettede forhandlinger, for at sikre, at vi undgår voldsanvendelse og undgår at skrue yderligere op for temperaturen under denne debat.
That means that we need to resolve this dispute through negotiation, hard negotiation perhaps but determined to make sure there is no violence and no further turning up of the temperature of this debate.
Som andre talere har været inde på, er der ingen tvivl om, at den underliggende årsag til problemet er noget, man kender til over hele verden, nemlig bevarelsen af fiskebestandene.
As has been said by other speakers, there is no doubt that the basis of this problem is one which is known worldwide, namely the conservation of fish stocks.
Canada har dummet sig og griber det måske an på en forkert og ulovlig måde.
Canada has blundered into this and may be approaching it in the wrong way and illegally.
Men det er et problem, som vil opstå i andre områder og ved andre lejligheder, og et problem, hvor Den Europæiske Union, og kommissæren, håber jeg, vil spille en førende rolle med henblik på at finde en global løsning.
But this is a problem that will arise in other areas and on other occasions and one in which the European Union, and I hope the Commissioner, will be playing a leading role to make sure it is tackled on a global basis.
Det er tankevækkende, at denne frihed blev fastslået på dette tidspunkt, hvor størstedelen af de europæiske lande var bekymret over Portugals og Spaniens hegemoni på havet, og der endnu ikke var noget, der hed Canada.
It is strange that the theory of the freedom of the sea was elaborated at that time because most European countries were then concerned with Portuguese and Spanish domination in maritime matters and Canada did not yet exist.
Det er således ironisk, at det i dag er fiskere fra disse to lande, der er det primære mål for et anslag mod denne frihed i et område, som de selv har opdaget som fiskeplads, og hvor de altid har haft traditionelle rettigheder.
By a tragic irony, the fishermen of those two countries are now the first victims of an attack on that very freedom in zones that they opened up to fishing and in which they have always enjoyed traditional rights.
Det åbne hav er i dag heldigvis en international offentlig fælled, dvs. menneskehedens fælles arv, hvor intet land, uanset hvor mægtigt det er, ensidigt kan sætte loven.
The high seas are today, fortunately, an international public condominium, that is to say a common heritage of mankind in which, as in outer space, no country, however powerful, may unilaterally impose its own law.
Canadas militære intervention mod forsvarsløse fisker både, der udøver deres virksomhed uden for Canadas eksklusive økonomiske område, er en uacceptabel krænkelse af den internationale ret, en barbarisk handling mellem civiliserede lande, en handling, der endda er rettet mod allierede inden for NATO, der hævder siden den 2. verdenskrigs afslutning at have sikret freden, friheden og retssamfundet i denne del af verden.
Canada's naval action against unarmed fishing vessels operating outside its exclusive economic zone is an inadmissible violation of international law. It is an act of barbarism between civilized countries and even more so between allies in an organization such as NATO which prides itself on having secured peace, freedom and civilization under the rule of law in this part of the world since the second world war.
Jeg er meget imponeret over, hvor hurtigt Kommissionen har arbejdet med denne sag.
I was very impressed by the speed of the Commission in the work it has done in this instance.
Mange af mine vælgere ønsker, at vi kunne få den samme hurtige indgriben fra Kommissionens side, når der er tale om sager, der angår fiskerflåder såvel inden for som uden for Den Europæiske Union.
Many of my constituents would ask that we could have the same quick intervention by the Commission in affairs that affect fishing fleets within the European Union as well as outside it.
Vi håber selvfølgelig, at det vil være muligt at nå til forståelse med Canada, men før der kan være tale om nogen form for forhandling, er det primære mål at få genetableret international ret, da der i intet europæisk retssystem forhandles med lovovertrædere. Krænkelser af jurisdiktionsgrænser, i det foreliggende tilfælde maritime grænser, accepteres ikke og underlægges sanktioner i forbindelse med lande i Den Tredje Verden, og så meget mindre kan en sådan overtrædelse accepteres i forbindelse med lande i Den Første Verden.
Miranda (GUE/NGL). - (PT) Madam President, as has already been mentioned, what we have here is a flagrant violation of international law by Canada, which has seized a fishing vessel of a Member State of the European Union, threatened other vessels, particularly Spanish and Portuguese, and actually prevented vessels flying a Community flag from fishing in international waters.
Miranda (GUE/NGL). - (PT) Fru formand, som tidligere nævnt har Canada åbenlyst krænket folkeretten med opbringningen af en EF-fiskerbåd, truslerne mod andre fartøjer, især spanske og portugisiske, og med forsøget på at hindre fartøjer, der sejler under EF-flag, i at fiske i internationalt farvand.
Clearly, we hope it will be possible to reach an understanding with Canada but the first objective, before any negotiations can take place, must be to restore the rule of the international law that has been broken, because never at any time, under any European legal system, is it the practice to negotiate with anyone who has committed an offence or broken the law.
Det skal understreges, at der ikke er tale om hensynet til bevarelsen af ressourcerne, som de canadiske myndigheder gerne vil give det udseende af.
This is not — it must be emphasized — about resources or their protection, as the Canadian authorities would have us believe.
I så fald ville vi ubetinget bakke op om Canada.
If it were, we would be right behind them.
Hvad der er på spil, er fordelingen af fiskeriindsatsen mellem de stater, der fisker i den pågældende zone, Canadas ønske om at udvide sin eksklusive økonomiske zone og forsøget på at løse interne politiske problemer ad denne vej.
What this is about is the distribution of fishing between the various States operating in the zone, Canada's ambition to extend its exclusive economic zone and its attempt to solve its domestic political problems in this way.
Når dette problem er løst, kan vi måske overveje at sætte økologiske problemer på dagsorden, som dem, der er blevet rejst af nogle medlemmer af De Grønnes Gruppe.
We could also perhaps cite ecological problems such as those raised by some members of the Green Group.
Men det er ikke det, debatten drejer sig om i øjeblikket.
But that is not the issue in this debate.
Måske kan vi, når dette problem er løst, anmode FN om at fastsætte en bedre regulering af fangsten og fordelingen af fiskeressourcerne i internationalt farvand.
We could also perhaps ask the United Nations to improve the regulation of catches and the division of the living resources of the high seas.
Men i realiteten har lande som Canada, der endnu ikke har ratificeret havretskonventionen, ikke beføjelser til at anmode om en sådan intervention.
But the truth is that countries such as Canada, which have not yet ratified the Convention on the Law of the Sea, have no authority to ask the UN to intervene.
Enhver aftale må tage hensyn til fiskerne, der altid glemmes, og til de europæiske fiskeindustrier, da det er beklageligt, at fiskernes verden bliver mindre og mindre i forbindelse med den meget omtalte globalisering.
Any agreement must also take account of the fishermen, who are always forgotten, and the European fishing industries, because it is sad that when we speak of globalization the fishermen should be among the few to see their world constantly shrinking.
Det er i øvrigt latterligt, at Canada — der ønsker at give det udseende af at nære en særlig interesse for bevarelsen af ressourcerne, men som anfægter historiske rettigheder og truer de allerede svækkede fjernfiskerbådes eksistens — foreslår at femdoble sin egen fangstkvote for den omhandlede fiskeart.
It is absurd that Canada — while it wishes to present itself as particularly interested in conserving resources and calls historic rights into question in this way. jeopardizing the viability of long-haul fishing fleets, like the Portuguese, which are already vulnerable — should at the same time be seeking what amounts to a five-fold increase in its catch quota for that species of fish.
Bortset fra dette kan denne krise indebære nogle positive aspekter for Den Europæiske Union.
Apart from this, the crisis may have some positive side-effects for the European Union.
Et andet positivt aspekt er den europæiske forankring i det atlantiske, som
Another is the political, untechnocratic
Canada har ifølge de internationale regler begået sørøveri.
By international standards, Canada has committed a real act of piracy.
Også Parlamentet må nødvendigvis klart afvise og på det kraftigste fordømme Canadas holdning og i lighed med den beslutning, der er truffet i Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter suspendere de planlagte møder med canadiske parlamentarikere, indtil international ret er genetableret.
It must firmly repudiate the Canadian attitude, condemn it in energetic and practical terms and, on the lines already decided by the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, suspend the meetings planned with members of the Canadian parliament until that country has acted to restore the rule of international law.
Gallagher (RDE). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg håber, at jeg repræsenterer interesserne hos den irske fiskerisektor, som jo naturligvis har en mere end forbigående interesse i de sidste par dages begivenheder og navnlig i forhandlingen her i dag.
Gallagher (RDE). — Madam President, I would hope that I would represent the views of the Irish fishing industry which, needless to say, has more than a passing interest in the events of the last few days and particularly in this debate today.
udtryk på hans pressekonference i går, og jeg er meget skuffet over kommissær Bonino.
I am astonished at the arrogance and hypocrisy of the Spanish MEPs and also of the Spanish Foreign Minister at his press conference yesterday, and I am very disappointed with Com missioner Bonino.
Måske findes der ikke noget mindstemål.
There might not be minimum sizes.
Men naturligvis er der den sunde fornuft.
But, of course, there is common sense.
En kønsmoden hellefisk skal være mellem 60 og 70 cm lang for at gyde, og det er det, der er interessant: firs procent af fangsten var under 38 cm.
A mature halibut must be between 60 and 70 cm long to spawn and that is what is interesting: eighty percent of the catch was under 38 cm.
Nu findes der nogle henstillinger fra NAFO, og her står der, at maskestørrelsen skal være 130 mm.
Now, there are recommendations in NAFO and the recommendations say that the mesh size should be 130 mm.
Så jeg mener, at vi bør koncentrere os om det egentlige.
So I think we should concentrate on the real issue.
Det ville være barnligt, fru formand, hvis vi aflyste mødet mellem den canadiske delegation og delegationen fra Europa-Parlamentet.
I think it would be childish. Madam President, if we were to cancel the meeting between the Canadian delegation and the delegation of the European Parliament.
Sammenfattende vil jeg gerne lykønske den canadiske regering, fordi den har stået fast i denne sag.
To conclude. I would congratulate the Canadian Government for taking such a firm stand on this issue.
Jeg håber imidlertid også, at den vil stå lige så fast, når det drejer sig om andre spørgsmål i forbindelse med en bæredygtig forvaltning af naturressourcer.
However, I also hope that it will also take a firm stand in dealing with other issues of managing natural resources in a sustainable way.
Añoveros Trias de Bes (PPE). — (ES) Fru formand, denne forsamlings ytringsfrihed bør aldrig tillade en kollega at fornærme nogen, men i dette tilfælde har den kollega, der lige har talt, fornærmet spanierne uden grund.
Añoveros Trias de Bes (PPE). — (ES) Madam President, freedom of expression in this Assembly ought never to be a licence to insult, and in this instance the colleague who has just spoken has gratuitously insulted the Spanish.
Vi bliver nødt til at se på hele baggrunden.
We must look at the history of this.
Vi må se på, at EU sidste år landede omkring 50.000 ton og i NAFO, hvor både EU og Canada er medlemmer, indgik man en aftale om kun at lande 27.000 ton i år.
We must look at the fact that last year the EU landed some 50 000 tonnes and in NAFO, of which the EU and Canada are both members, an agreement was reached to land in total only 27 000 tonnes this year.
Noget er rivende galt.
There is something drastically wrong.
Der findes videnskabelige beviser på behovet for at bevare bestanden.
The scientific evidence is there of the necessity to conserve.
Jeg ønsker kun, at vi fra tid til anden, når vi kommer over landingskvoterne i medlemsstaterne, kunne blive ved med at fiske, indtil klagen over det bliver stadfæstet.
I only wish that from time to time when we overshoot the landing quotas in the Member States, we could continue to fish until such time as the appeal against it is held.
Det fungerer ikke inden for Unionen, og det fungerer heller ikke i andre dele af verden.
That does not work within the Union and it should not work in other parts of the world.
Valdivielso de Cué (PPE). — (ES) Fru formand, når man tager ordet, bør man have et vist kendskab til sagen og ikke udtale sig om problemerne uden at vide, hvad man taler om.
Izquierdo Rojo (PSE). — (ES) Madam President, it is highly significant that those who have spoken critically in this debate have at no point denied the evidence that an illegal action has been committed against the Community fleet in international waters.
Når alt kommer til alt, har der været et tilfælde af sørøveri i internationalt farvand, og det er det væsentlige i denne sag. Alt andet er sagen uvedkommende.
And instead of pursuing the issue, what they have done is to produce, all over again — as in all the fisheries debates — a string of hostile arguments which are completely irrelevant.
Jeg tror, det bliver nødvendigt med et moratorium.
I believe a moratorium may be necessary.
Jeg har stor respekt for NAFO, og jeg mener, at vi bør lytte meget opmærksomt til NAFO's synspunkter.
I have great respect for NAFO and believe that we must listen very closely to its views.
Hvis ikke vi reagerer hurtigt, vil fremtidens fiskere komme til at lide endnu mere.
If we do not act quickly the fishermen of the future will suffer even more.
Det er en skændsel for Unionen, en skændsel for os alle, at der ikke er fastsat en minimumstørrelse for denne fiskeart.
It is an indictment of the Union, an indictment of all of us, that there is no minimum size for the type of fish that is being caught.
Hvis vi gennemførte den logik overalt og ikke havde nogen minimum størrelser, hvad ville der så blive tilbage til de kommende generationer?
If we followed that logic throughout and had no minimum size, what would be left for future generations?
Izquierdo Rojo (PSE). — (ES) Fru formand, det er meget betegnende, at de kritiske røster under denne forhandling ikke har benægtet den kendsgerning, at der er foretaget en ulovlig handling over for fællesskabsflåden i internationalt farvand.
An illegal action has been committed against the Community fleet and it is only right that we, as representatives of the European people, should come to its defence.
Spanierne — det er vi klar over, og det er min interesse i denne sag — har i årenes løb plyndret farvandene ud for den irske kyst.
And it has to be defended here and now because it is ours and because the truth must be proclaimed loud and clear.
De har indgået aftaler, som på grund af det begrænsede antal kontrolfartøjer i Irland betød, at mens et fartøj fuldt lovligt sejlede ind i farvandet ud for den irske kyst, fiskede andre ulovligt ud for kysten.
And the truth is that this fleet was fishing legally in international waters, outside the 200-mile territorial limit.
De har ingen sans for fair play, og det er vi klar over i Irland.
The truth is that it was complying with the requirements for inspection and control.
Derfor siger jeg, at vi vil insistere på strengere kontrol med de spaniere, der sejler ind i Det Irske Hav imod vores ønsker.
The truth is that it was complying with the regulations regarding the size of the allowed catch, complying with the regulations regarding the size of the young fish.
På indeværende tids punkt må vi forsvare denne fællesskabsflåde, fordi den er vores, og vi bør fortælle sandheden vidt og bredt.
The Spaniards — we are well aware, and this is my interest in this — have plundered the waters off the Irish coast over the years.
Og sandheden er, at denne flåde fiskede lovligt i det pågældende område i internationalt farvand, uden for 200-sømile-grænsen.
They made agreements whereby, given the restricted number of our protection vessels, when one vessel legally entered the waters off the Irish coast others fished illegally off the coast.
Sandheden er, at fællesskabsflåden fiskede lovligt, hvad angår inspektion og kontrol.
They have no sense of fair play and we in Ireland realize that.
Sandheden er, at fællesskabsflåden fiskede lovligt, hvad angår antal og omfang af fangsterne, og lovligt, hvad angår størrelsen af fiskeyngelen.
That is why I say we shall be insisting on stricter controls on the Spaniards entering the Irish Sea against our wishes.
Sammenfattende vil jeg gerne foreslå fiskerikommissæren, for hvem jeg nærer den største respekt, at vi ikke har nogen forud fastsatte betingelser.
In conclusion, can I suggest to our Commissioner for fisheries, for whom I have the greatest respect, that we should have no set preconditions.
Lad os sætte os til forhandlingsbordet og drøfte sagen med canadierne med det samme uden forbehold, og hvis der ikke er problemer, hvis canadierne har overtrådt loven, så lad os behandle det i henhold til folkeretten.
Sit down and enter into discussions with the Canadians immediately without any preconditions and if there are no problems, if the law has been broken by the Canadians, then let that be dealt with under international law.
Fru formand, Canadas angreb er skammeligt utilstedeligt.
Madam President, Canada's aggressive action is shamefully out of place.
Vi må kategorisk afvise det, som en yderst alvorlig præcedens, for at forsvare Den Europæiske Unions interesser.
We have to reject it emphatically as a very serious precedent, in order to defend the interests of the European Union.
Der bør ikke være noget som helst at tage fejl af.
There can be no doubt about it.
Fællesskabsinstitutionernes samhørighed, fasthed og støtte er meget vigtig, for heri ligger den bedste garanti for at nå en løsning.
The cohesion, the resolution and the support of Community institutions will be crucial, and they offer the best guarantee that a solution can be found.
Varela Suanzes-Carpegna (PPE). — (ES) Fru formand, fru kommissær, mine damer og herrer, med den ro, som kræves i vanskelige øjeblikke — men samtidig med den fasthed, der er nødvendig på dette tidspunkt — vil jeg gerne uddrage nogle konklusioner af den debat, der er ført.
Varela Suanzes-Carpegna (PPE). — (ES) Madam President. Commissioner, Ladies and Gentlemen, with the calm that is required in difficult moments — but at the same time with the resolution that is necessary in the present situation — I would like to draw a few conclusions from the debate so far.
Weber (V). — (EN) Fru formand, nogle af kollegerne har i eftermiddag fremstillet sagen, som om det vigtigste spørgsmål var, om det var lovligt eller ulovligt, at det spanske skib blev opbragt i internationalt farvand.
Weber (V). — Madam President, some of our colleagues were advocating this afternoon that the main issue was whether it was legal or illegal that the Spanish ship was seized in international waters.
Jeg mener, at de misforstår det væsentlige.
I think they missed the point.
Det centrale i eftermiddagens forhandling er helt klart bevarelsen af fiskebestandene og en bæredygtig forvaltning af naturressourcerne.
I think the issue of this afternoon's debate is definitely conservation of fish stocks and sustainable management of natural resources.