natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mit spørgsmål er: Passer det, at Kommissionen i forbindelse med direktivet om økologisk landbrug ad bagdøren og uden at underrette Parlamentet forsøgte at muliggøre mærkningen af økologisk fremstillede levnedsmidler som sådanne også, når de er blevet modificeret genetisk?
My question is this: Is it true that when dealing with the directive on ecological farm ing the Commission attempted to ensure that genetically engineered foodstuffs could also be labelled as ecological produce, and did so in a backhanded manner, without consulting Parliament?
Hvis det er således, er det for det første en omgåelse af Parlamentets beføjelser, og for det andet viser det, hvor vigtigt det er, at jeg tager også det op her.
If so, then this amounts to circumvention of Parliament's rights, and the fact that I am taking up this point here also indicates how important it is.
tilsætningsstoffer, der indeholder bestemmelser om obligatorisk godkendelse og obligatorisk mærkning.
I have already said that we have a Directive covering genetically modified additives, which contains mandatory rules on authorization and labelling.
Derfor er der ikke noget nyt behov for at tage dette punkt op igen i dette direktiv. One door, one key er en procedurebestemmelse.
Accordingly, there is no new need to take up that point in the current Directive.
Derudover skal De nu spørge om, hvor lovbestemmelsen hører hjemme, for vi kan ikke behandle noget, vi allerede har behandlet i et direktiv, endnu en gang i en forordning og så måske gøre det på en anden måde.
At the same time, you must ask yourselves where these rules belong, and we cannot treat something that has already been covered in a Directive again - and even differently - in a Regulation.
Jeg gentager: Skulle der opstå problemer i forbindelse med anvendelsen af denne forordning, er vi til enhver tid villige til at foretage relevante ændringer inden for rammerne af de andre direktiver, der allerede findes vedrørende genetisk modificerede tilsætningsstoffer -eller vedrørende tilsætningsstoffer i almindelighed og derudover for genteknologiske stoffer.
I repeat: Should any problems arise with regard to the application of this Regulation, then we will always be prepared to make corresponding changes in the context of the other directives applying to genetically modified additives, or to additives in general and genetically engineered substances in particular.
Retssystematisk er det, man kalder sedes materiae - jeg anmoder om Deres overbærenhed - af betydning, dvs. at dér, hvor noget er fastsat, skal det være fastsat definitivt, det må ikke spredes over forskellige forordninger og direktiver.
On the other hand, within a legal system the principle of sedes materiae - please bear with me - is an important consideration, meaning that where the law deals with a particular topic, it must deal with it completely and not let it be strewn throughout various regulations and directives.
Med hensyn til proceduren har jeg sagt, at vort princip er one door, one key. For øvrigt har Parlamentet også allerede accepteret dette princip én gang, nemlig i forbindelse med farmaceutiske produkter.
With regard to legal proceedings, I explained that we follow the principle of 'one door, one key', which Parliament has, by the way, already accepted, primarily in connection with pharmaceutical products.
Så helt ukendt er princippet altså ikke for Dem.
So this House is not entirely a stranger to the principle.
Og det problem, De omtalte, eksisterer efter vor mening ikke, fordi vi - det vil vi jo kunne drøfte under sagen - i det af Dem omtalte direktiv principielt havde udelukket genetisk modificere de produkter, og derfor kunne et sådant problem slet ikke forekomme.
Moreover, we do not recognize the problem you raised -and we will of course have an opportunity to go into this during the proceedings - since we had excluded genetically modified products in principle from the Directive you mentioned, so no such problem could arise.
Men det kan vi jo drøfte i retten.
However, we can also discuss this matter in court, as you please.
BREYER (V). - (DE) Forhåbentlig ved kommissæren også, at der for det sidste punkts vedkommende allerede foreligger en klage fra Parlamentet, og at Kommissionen med sikkerhed vil tabe denne sag.
BREYER (V). - (DE) Hopefully the Commissioner is also aware that Parliament has already submitted a complaint on the latter point, and that the Commission is certain to lose the relevant case.
De ser overhovedet ikke, hvorledes De modsiger Dem selv.
You fail to notice how you contradict yourself.
På den ene side kræver De mindre bureaukrati, og i den næste sætning foreslår De, at spørgsmålene om tilladelse reguleres i forskellige direktiver.
On the one hand you call for less bureaucracy, and in the next breath you propose that questions concerning authorization be dealt with in different directives.
Vi har netop kun foreslået én godkendelses- og tilladelsesprocedure. De foreslår flere og skaber dermed bureaukrati!
We have just proposed a single authorization and approval procedure.
Derudover bliver jeg nødt til at gøre Dem opmærksom på, at princippet om one door, one key endnu ikke er vedtaget i Parlamentet.
Furthermore, I should point out that the 'one door, one key' principle has not yet been approved by Parliament.
Vi har ganske vist udarbejdet en betænkning - jeg er tilfældigvis ordfører for den - men det er endnu meget tvivlsomt, om Parlamentet er af samme mening som De.
Admittedly we have prepared a report - for which I, as it happens, am the rapporteur - but it is still highly questionable whether Parliament shares your opinion.
Derudover må jeg belære Dem om, hvad samfundsøkonomisk vurdering af konsekvenserne er: Det er nu engang ikke, som De tror, et velfærdsudvalg.
Moreover, I feel bound to explain to you what a socioeconomic impact assessment is: It is most definitely not, as you appear to believe, a welfare committee.
Egentlig skulle De vide, hvad det er, for Kommissionen har jo for nylig i spørgsmålet om BST udarbejdet en samfundsøkonomisk vurdering af konsekvenserne.
In actual fact you ought to be very much aware of what it is, for the Commission recently completed a socioeconomic assessment of the impact of BST.
De taler om arbejdspladser, så vil jeg nævne en undersøgelse fra USA's land brugsministerium, der, som De ved, ikke står mig nær.
You talk about jobs, so let me mention a study conducted by the American Department of Agriculture which, as you well know, is not an institution with which I have close ties.
Deri udregnes det, at 90% afalle arbejdspladser inden for landbruget vil falde bort i løbet af de kommende 30 år.
The department has calculated that within the next 30 years the agricultural sector will shed 90% of its jobs.
Og så taler De om sikring af arbejdspladser! Efter min mening er det en hån!
And you talk about securing jobs!
Hvad nu BST angår, fru formand, har det virkelig intet med samfundsøkonomisk vurdering at gøre, vi gjorde i vor afgørelse udtrykkelig opmærksom på, at vi med hensyn til de forskningmæssige og videnskabelige resultater ikke så nogen grund til at forbyde BST.
As for BST, Madam President, that really has nothing whatsoever to do with socioeconomic assessment. In our decision on this we expressly pointed out that with respect to the results of research and scientific endeavour we see no reason whatsoever to ban BST.
Vi sagde, at den eneste grund til, at vi ikke kunne tillade det, var, at det ville bringe vor landbrugspolitik ud af balance.
What we said was that we could not authorize its use because it would have fundamentally changed our agricultural policy.
Det er imidlertid ikke nogen samfundsøkonomisk vurdering, for en samfundsøkonomisk vurdering ser på, om der er moralske eller etiske betænkeligheder etc. Det er ikke vort problem.
However, that is not the same as a socioeconomic test, for such a test establishes whether or not there are moral or ethical objections, etc. That is not our problem.
Vort problem var: Vi kan ikke på den ene side lave en landbrugspolitik A og så tillade noget andet, som betyder B. Det har i dette tilfælde kun meget perifert noget med arbejdspladser at gøre.
Our problem was that we could not, on the one hand, come up with agricultural policy A and then authorize B. In the case in point, this is only very vaguely relevant to the employment problem.
En ting kan jeg sige med sikkerhed: Jo mere De udelukker og forbyder moderne metoder, jo mere bringer De arbejdspladser - i hvert fald i Europa - i fare.
One thing I am sure of: The more you rule out and prohibit modern processes, the worse you will damage jobs - at least in Europe.
Jeg vil lade det blive ved det.
I shall leave it at that.
Jeg håber, De kan udnytte tiden til at overveje og blive klogere.
I hope you can still use your time to rethink things and inform yourself about these matters.
Således som De netop talte, taler De helt bestemt forbi borgernes og navnlig forbrugernes betænkeligheder.
If you carry on talking the way you just did, then you will really be missing the point with respect to the reservations of our citizens and, especially, of consumers.
Hvis De engang gik til de store firmaer, som De altid skælder ud på, ville De konstatere, at de damer og herrer dér gør noget meget enkelt med deres forskningsafdelinger: De forlader Europa, fordi de siger, at det ikke mere har noget formål!
If you visited the major enterprises you are always condemning, you would find out that the people there with their research departments are doing something quite straightforward, namely leaving Europe, because they claim that there is no point in staying here any longer!
Vi kan godt selv se, at der er risici!
We can also see the dangers!
Vi er også villige til at lade os vurdere!
Moreover, we are prepared to subject ourselves to scrutiny.
Men vi vil ikke have uendelige offentlige høringer hos forskellige myndigheder og udsættelser, så at det varer to eller tre år, inden man kan arbejde med de simpleste små produkter.
But we do not want to have endless public hearings involving various authorities and postponements resulting in a two or
BANGEMANN, næstformand i Kommissionen. - (DE) Fru formand, fru ordfører, det gør mig ondt, at jeg først kunne være her kort før, De sluttede Deres indlæg.
BANGEMANN, Vice-President of the Commission. -(DE) Madam President, Madam rapporteur, I apologise that I only managed to get here just before the end of your speech.
Parlamentet er jo uhyre fleksibelt i behandlingen af punkterne på dagsordenen.
Parliament is extraordinarily flexible in its treat ment of the items on its agenda.
Oprindelig regnede vi ikke med, at denne betænkning ville blive behandlet mandag, den varjo planlagt til tirsdag.
Originally we had not reckoned with this report being dealt with on Monday,
BANGEMANN transplantation, skyldes dette en handling af største ædelhed og aldrig en ret.
Fourthly, for patients who may owe their lives to transplants, this transplant represents an act of the greatest generosity, and never a right.
Det kan De gå imod med et flertal, det har De mulighed for.
Now it is up to you to find a majority to oppose this view.
De kan vedtage Deres ændringsforslag med absolut flertal, men De kan ikke tvinge Kommissionen til at gøre noget, som den anser for skæbnesvangert, når det drejer sig om Europas fremtid.
You have the means to do so. You can adopt your amendments with an absolute majority, but you cannot force the Commission to do something which it regards as fatal to the destiny of Europe.
Transplantater - Forsyning med blod
Trade in transplant organs and self-sufficiency in blood
FORMANDEN. - Næste punkt på dagsordenen er for handling under ét om:
PRESIDENT. - The next item is the joint debate on the following two reports:
Betænkningen opfordrer Rådet til at træffe alle foran staltninger til at forhindre handel med organer på hele Fællesskabets område: forbud mod import af organer uden vished om deres oprindelse; organdonation skal være gratis og donoren anonym over for modtageren; udelukkelse af enhver specifik godtgørelse for det kirurgiske indgreb; autorisation til de hospitalsafdelinger der foretager transplantation; adskillelse mellem de medicin ske genoplivningsafdelinger og de kirurgiske afdelinger; forbud mod udtagelse af organer hos mindreårige, bortset fra undtagelsestilfælde; forbud mod udtagelse af organer hos umyndiggjorte voksne; absolut overholdelse af de patientventelister der er opstillet efter medicinske kriterier.
This report asks the Council to take every measure within its power to ban the trade in organs throughout the Community. There should be a ban on the import of organs unless their origin is certified; donations should be made free of charge and the anonymity of the donor and receiver should be maintained; there should be no specific remuneration for medical treatment; approval ratings should be granted to hospital departments in charge of transplants; intensive care units and surgical units should be separated; there should be a ban on the removal of organs from minors, except in exceptional cases; there should be a ban on the removal of organs from adults who are legally incapacitated; and waiting lists of patients drawn up on the basis of medical criteria must be strictly adhered to.
Dertil kommer informatisering af data om disponible organer; styrkelse af det europæiske samarbejde og samarbejdet mellem sundhedstjenesterne; øget videnskabelig forskning vedrørende kunstige organer og xenotransplantationer; oplysningskampagner, især over for unge, baseret på princippet om barmhjertighed og solidaritet med respekt for personer og individuelle følelser.
In addition, all data on available organs should be computerized; European cooperation and cooperation among health services should be reinforced; there should be more research in the area of artificial organs and xenografts; and there should be awarenessraising campaigns specially aimed at young people and based on the principle of generosity and solidarity in respecting individuals and personal feelings.
Denne betænkning opfordrer Kommissionen til at udarbejde en adfærdskodeks sammen med de uomgængelige lovgivningsmæssige og strafferetlige foranstaltninger.
This report asks the Commission to draw up a code of conduct which includes essential legislative and punitive measures.
Overtrædelser bør betragtes som mord, og det skal forbydes de skyldige læger at udøve lægevirksomhed for livstid.
Acts such as those I have described must be viewed as murder, and doctors found guilty of them must be prohibited from practising medicine for the rest of their lives.
SCHWARTZENBERG (PSE), ordfører. - (FR) Fru for mand, kære kolleger, i Argentina opdagede sundhedsminister César Arao i februar 1992, at de syge i la Colonia Montes de Ocan, et psykiatrisk hospital nær Buenos Aires, var blevet tappet for blod, havde fået fjernet organer, hornhinder, og at 1 395 af dem var forsvundet.
SCHWARTZENBERG (PSE), rapporteur. - (FR) Mad am President, Members, in February 1992 the Argentinian minister for health, Cesar Arao, discovered that the patients at the Colonia Montes de Ocan, a psychiatric hospital near Buenos Aires, were having blood, organs and corneas removed from them and that 1,395 of them had disappeared.
Vi bør kæmpe mod, hvad der kan opfattes som en absolut forbrydelse: et menneske ofres på de riges eller mægtiges alter, fordi det er svagt eller handicappet.
We must combat what could be considered an absolute crime: namely, a crime where an individual is sacrificed on the altar of the rich and powerful because he or she is weak or handicapped.
I Guatemala erklærede chefen for politiets informationstjeneste, hr. Bodilio Hichos Lopez, i juli 1992: »Vi ved, at børn, der er sendt til De Forenede Stater under påskud af at skulle adopteres dér, faktisk er blevet brugt som organdonorer.« Hvert barn koster 20 000 dollars.
In Guatemala in July 1992, Mr Bodilio Hichos Lopez, a police information officer, said: 'We know that children sent to the United States on the pretext of being adopted there are actually being used as organ donors.' Each child costs 20,000 dollars.
I Italien bragte børnehandleren Lucas di Nuzzo mellem 1988 og 1992 4 ooo børn fra Brasilien til landet for at blive adopteret dér: 1 000 er genfundet, der er intet spor af de øvrige 3 000.
In Italy, between 1988 and 1992, child trafficker Lucas de Nuzzo had 4,000 Brazilian children sent over for adoption: 1,000 have been found, but there is no trace of the other 3,000.
To italienske dommere, hr. Gargani og hr. Martinello, opdagede i Salvadore de Bahia, at camorraen har sendt børn til hemmelige klinikker i Mexico, Thailand og selv Europa for dér at få udtaget samtlige deres organer.
Two Italian judges, Messrs Gargani and Martinello found out that in Salvador de Bahia the Camorra had sent children to underground clinics in Mexico, Thailand and even Europe where they had their organs removed.
CECI (PSE), ordfører. - (IT) Fru formand, i 1992 viste en ganske vist ufuldstændig undersøgelse i EF, at ud af 22.365 undersøgte var 5.600 HIV-positive, og blandt disse havde man allerede konstateret mere end 1.000 dødsfald.
CECI (PSE), rapporteur. - (IT) Madam President, in 1992 a study - and an incomplete one at that - carried out in the European Community showed that out of 22,365 people surveyed, 5,600 were HIV-positive, and of these more than 1,000 have already died.
Vi ved, at antallet af ofre vil øges, og dette såvel som manglen på fuldstændig sikkerhed i blodtransfusioner og nødvendigheden af at fastslå, at disse patienter, der uskyldigt er blevet inficeret med AIDS, har behov for, at man anerkender det særlige ved den skade, de har lidt, har ført til, at Miljøudvalget i aften forelægger denne betænkning.
We know that the number of victims is destined to rise. The report presented by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection this evening focuses on this fact, namely the inadequate safety of blood transfusions and the need to acknowledge that patients who have been unwittingly infected with AIDS need to have the particular nature of the damage caused to them recognized.
Men denne betænkning er blevet mere kompleks og kræver indgriben ud fra en anden overvejelse, som er følgende: i løbet af sommeren har en række lande i EF og især Italien set en række produkter forsvinde fra apotekerne, livsnødvendige produkter som albumin eller medikamenter, som anvendes til behandling af blødere.
However, the report has become even more com plex, and has led to a request for action on the basis of the following consideration: during the summer, several Community countries - especially Italy - saw a number of life-saving products removed from their pharmacies,
I Colombia har man i forelæsningssalen i Barranquillas medicinske fakultet fundet ti lig af fattige, deriblandt en ung pige på 15 år, og resterne af 40 andre personer.
In the lecture hall of the faculty of medicine in Barranquilla, Colombia, the bodies of 10 indigents, the body of a teenager, and the remains of 40 other people were found.
Fakultetets vagtmænd slog tiggerne ned med slag med baseballkøller.
The wardens at the faculty would knock beggars out with a baseball bat.
Ofrene, der var bevidstløse, blev først dræbt, efter at man havde udtaget de mest rentable organer til salg på det sorte marked.
Falling into a coma, they would only be revived after their most profitable organs had been removed.
For det andet at menneskeliv ikke haren pris.
The organs are then sold on the black market.
CECI accepterer medlemsstaterne, at det er lovligt at tappe blod og betale donoren.
There are two different models for this: in some cases, the Member States accept that blood may be taken and the donor paid.
Dette vedrører dog kun en meget lille del af de europæiske donorer, hvilket er godt at vide.
However, this involves only a minute proportion of European donors, a fact that should be emphasized.
Vi ville ikke bryde med noget princip ved for eksempel at arbejde på at forbyde, at de cirka 10% af donorerne, som i Tyskland afgiver blod mod betaling, ophører med det i morgen.
We would not be upsetting the esta blished order if, say, tomorrow we were to prevent the approximately 10% of donors in Germany who give blood for money from donating it.
Men der er et andet forhold, der ødelægger markedet, og det er, at medlemsstater, der forbyder donering af blod mod betaling inden for landets grænser, ikke forbyder, at blod fremstillet af plasma tappet mod betaling markedsføres på deres område.
However, there is another way of contaminating the market: those Member States which ban the donation of blood for money within their borders have not banned the sale on their territory of blood obtained in this way.
Hr. Schwartzenberg takker jeg mange gange for overtagelsen af de ændringsforslag, som jeg selv stillede i Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse.
I would like to thank Mr Schwartzenberg for adopting the amendments that I myself submitted to the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protec tion.
For organtransplantation og forsyning med blod anvender PPE-Gruppen som etisk princip, at handel er fuldstændig forkasteligt.
The Group of the European People's Party treats organ transplantation and blood supplies according to the ethical principle that trade in them is fundamentally wrong.
På denne baggrund påskønner jeg derfor i høj grad Schwartzenberg-betænk-ningen, som fastlægger dette princip.
Accordingly, I have great admiration for the Schwartzenberg report, which lays down this principle.
Samme hr. Schwartzenberg har imidlertid ændret fru Cecis betænkning temmelig meget på en række punkter, og jeg håber, at han, og jeg håber også andre her i Parlamentet, efter begrundelsen er villig til at støtte de ændringsforslag, som igen skærper den lidt.
However, the selfsame Mr Schwartzenberg has amended the report by Mrs Ceci in a number of respects, and I hope that he, like others here in Parliament, will be prepared to slightly intensify the amendments again and support them in the light of her explanatory statement.
Tiden er inde til at kaste lys over disse aspekter og skabe et ensartet europæisk marked med klar angivelse af den retning, EF ønsker at gå, uden at man lukker øjnene for noget.
The time has come to clarify this aspect of the issue and harmonize the European market by firmly and clearly indicating the direction in which the European Community should head.
Dette vil jeg gøre helt klart.
This should be stated in no uncertain terms.
Det ligger os først og fremmest på sinde at sikre Europas borgeres behandlingsbehov; men Kommissionens under søgelse, som i meget stort omfang har brugt Van-Aken-rapportens resultater, viser os, at vi kan skifte kurs, kan beslutte fra i dag af at sørge for den selvforsyning, som allerede er blevet krævet i et EØF-direktiv, direktiv 381/89; men ulykkeligvis har man ikke haft de nødvendige og tilstrækkelige instrumenter til at gennemføre dette mål.
In the first place, we are committed to the need to continue catering for the medical needs of every Euro pean citizen, but the study presented by the Commission - which made wholesale use of the results of the Van Aken report - shows us that we are now in a position to change course and aim to achieve the self-sufficiency called for way back in Directive 381 dating from 1989. Unfortunately, this directive was not endowed with the instruments necessary for achieving such an objective.
Hr. Hadjigeorgiou vil indgående komme ind på organ transplantationer-jeg gør det i slutningen af mit indlæg.
Mr Hadjigeorgiou is due to go into organ transplantation in detail - I will do so towards the end of my speech.
I begrundelsen i betænkningen om forsyning med blod vælger fru Ceci med rette selvforsyningsprincippet.
In the explanatory statement of the report on blood sufficiency, Mrs Ceci quite rightly opted in favour of the principle of self-sufficiency.
Min gruppe gør det også, og det gør den meget strengt.
My group does so too, and favours its rather strict application.