natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tidsplanen for spørgetiden opdeles på følgende måde: 15 minutter til første del, 45 minutter til anden del og 15 minutter til hver kommissær.
The time for this item will be allocated as follows: 15 minutes for the first part and 45 minutes for the second part, with 15 minutes for each member of the Commission.
Det står alt sammen allerede på dagsordenen. Jeg ville blot lige igen minde Dem om det.
All this is already set out in the agenda, but I wished to remind the House of it again.
Fordelingssystemer stjæler i grunden altid fra de små for at give til de store. Men der er nu engang forskel i den forbindelse.
No changes have been proposed for this week or for the sittings on 27 and 28 March, and the order of business is thus established. (')
Morgan (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, siden Parlamentets seneste møde i Strasbourg har Europa været vidne til en omfattende miljøkatastrofe, efter at olietankskibet Sea Empress gik på grund ud for det vestlige Wales.
Morgan (PSE). — Mr President, since Parliament last met in Strasbourg, Europe has witnessed a massive environmental catastrophe when the Sea Empress oil tanker ran aground in west Wales.
Efter et totalt mislykket redningsforsøg strømmede 70.000 tons olie ud i havet ud for Wales' vestkyst.
Following a catastrophic salvage attempt, 70, 000 tonnes of oil poured into the sea off the west Wales coast.
Katastrofen fandt sted i et miljømæssigt meget følsomt område med 82 lokaliteter af særlig videnskabelig interesse.
The disaster occurred in an environmentally very sensitive area containing 82 sites of special scientific interest.
Vi forventer at høre en positiv udtalelse fra Kommissionen.
We look forward to hearing a positive statement by the Commission.
Formanden. - Fru Morgan, De er helt klar over, at dette punkt er opført på dagsordenen for fredag! De kan frem sætte Deres indlæg på fredag.
A further problem is that even where there is overall agreement between the groups on a particular distribution or the mechanism to be used, things can sometimes go wrong and an emergency procedure is needed, which again seems to give rise to certain problems.
Nu har vi i den forbindelse nok et problem.
There are two reasons for proposing this amendment to the Rules of Procedure.
Nemlig at der, når der er indgået en global aftale mellem grupperne om en fordeling eller om denne fordelingsmekanisme, ikke desto mindre somme tider kan ske ulykker alligevel, og at vi således må have en nødbremseprocedure.
Firstly — and I am referring to two specific instances here - there was a case in the Committee on Research, Technological Development and Energy when a very good and well-respected chairman, Mr Claude De sama - alias Hercule Poirot - was not re-elected because the system had allocated that committee to another group.
I forbindelse med denne nødbremseprocedure viser det sig så igen, at der kan opstå visse problemer.
The committee wished to reserve the right to reappoint this man, who had been so successful in the post.
Der er to grunde til, at vi nu foreslår denne revision af forretningsordenen her.
President. - As you know, Mrs Morgan, this item is on the agenda for Friday, and you will be able to raise the matter then.
For det første -og jeg refererer til to eksisterende tilfælde - har vi i Udvalget om Forskning og Energi haft en situation med en meget velfungerende og af alle agtet formand, jeg taler om hr. Claude Desama - alias Hercule Poirot - som ikke blev genvalgt, fordi systemet nu engang havde tildelt en anden gruppe dette udvalg.
In the second case, the chairmanship of a delegation was allocated to the GUE group under the system, but the group then deliberately put forward a proposal which should not have been allowed, because it was designed to provoke the country with which the delegation was connected.
Puerta (GUE/NGL). - (ES) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne spørge, om Parlamentet i denne mødeperiode vil få lejlighed til at reagere politisk på regeringsrepræsentanternes erklærede ønske om at marginalisere Parlamentet ved regeringskonferencen.
Puerta (GUE/NGL). - (ES) Mr President, I should like to ask if the agenda includes an item that will allow Parliament to give a political response to the decision which is being taken by the representatives of the Member States' governments to marginalize it at the Intergovernmental Conference.
Det forekommer mig at være et særdeles vigtigt emne, og jeg er ikke klar over, om det er indbefattet i de ordinære dagsordenspunkter.
In my view, this is a matter of the utmost importance, and I am not sure that it will be covered by the ordinary debates this week.
Jeg finder, at vi må tage stilling hertil enten i forbindelse med de opførte forhandlinger eller i form af et særligt punkt på dagsordenen. nen.
I believe that Parliament must take a position on this issue, either via a statement by its President, or through the inclusion of a specific item on the agenda.
Formanden. - De ved, at hele onsdag formiddag står regeringskonferencen på dagsordenen, og jeg er helt og aldeles overbevist om, at De ikke vil undlade at benytte lejligheden til at udtale Dem om dette spørgsmål onsdag formiddag! (2)
In both cases an emergency procedure was needed. The Committee on the Rules of Procedure put forward three proposals - and I have to say that it was extremely difficult, because we were trying to make provision for something previously not covered in the Rules - and each in turn was rejected.
Ændring af forretningsordenens artikel 142
Amendment of Rule 142
Formanden. - Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (A4-0019/96) af Wijsenbeek for Udvalget for Forretnings-
The PPE Group has put forward an amendment requiring an absolute majority where there are two candidates, a situation which could perfectly well arise.
Heri står nemlig allerførst, at vi, i modsætning til hvad der tidligere stod i forretningsordenen, lader akklamationsproceduren være reglen; men at vi ikke desto mindre i tilfælde af vanskeligheder eventuelt kan lade afholde en afstemning.
President. - The next item is the report (A4-0019/96) by Mr Wijsenbeek, on behalf of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities, on the amendment of Rule 142 of the Rules of Procedure (election of committee bureaux).
') Uopsættelig forhandling: se protokollen.
') Decision on urgency: see Minutes
2) Taletid - Aktuel og uopsættelig debat (foreslåede emner): se protokollen.
2) Speaking time - Topical and urgent debate (subjects proposed): see Minutes .
Wijsenbeek medlemmer bakke denne op, og han må i al fald kunne samle flertal blandt de gyldigt afgivne stemmer. Når der er flere kandidater, skal man have simpelt flertal.
Turkish Joint Committee. In both cases the d'Hondt system threw up candidates who created disquiet, at least among some members of that committee and that delegation.
gyldne middelvej mellem det, som kræves på grund af realiteterne her i Parlamantet, nemlig den d'Hondtske metode, og behovet for en entydig forretningsorden.
I refer particularly to the case of the Turkish Joint Committee, where the issue even became a personal or confrontational one, and it emerged that a third country was intervening: Turkey, which expressed its disapproval of the election as chairman of the person nominated in accordance with the d'Hondt system and the consultation procedures.
Før jeg blev valgt ind i dette Parlament, var jeg ikke bekendt med det system; men for hver dag der går her i Parlamentet, opdager jeg stadig flere fordele ved det.
As he says, even if there is only one candidate, a sixth of the members of a delegation or of a committee can now demand a vote and that candidate can only be elected in the first ballot by absolute majority.
Ephremidis (GUE/NGL). - (EL) Hr. formand, vi støtter hr. Wijsenbeeks forslag, fordi det retter op på en situation, der har skabt problemer i forbindelse med valg af formænd for parlamentsudvalg og delegationer til blandede parlamentariske udvalg.
In the second ballot that absolute becomes simple, and there fore we will be able to constitute delegations when Members have had an opportunity, if they so wish, to protest about the consequences of the d'Hondt system, without holding up Parliament's work.
Ford (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, allerførst vil jeg gerne ønske hr. Wijsenbeek tillykke med hans betænkning om dette vanskelige emne.
So we agree with his emergency brake, though I have to say on behalf of the Socialist Group that there is still one brake missing.
Som han anfører, udspringer betænkningen af de problemer, som man stødte på ved nedsættelsen af udvalg og delegationer i begyndelsen af denne valgperiode, nærmere bestemt Udvalget om Forskning, Teknologisk Udvikling og Energi samt Delegationen til det Blandede Parlamentariske Udvalg EU-Tyrkiet.
We have no procedure at the moment for dealing with situations where chairmen or vice-chairmen of committees or delegations actually lose the confidence of the members of their committee, of their delegation, or of this House.
I begge tilfælde resulterede den d'Hondtske metode i kandidater, som skabte utilfredshed hos i det mindste nogle medlemmer af nævnte udvalg og delegation.
There is a case at the moment concerning the intervention in the Canadian elections by the chairman of the Canadian delegation.
De praktiske erfaringer har vist, at en anvendelse i god tro af den d'Hondtske metode til fordeling af posterne ikke har været tilstrækkelig, og at der er opstået nogle meget ubehagelige problemer i denne forbindelse.
Fabre-Aubrespy (EDN). - (FR) Mr President, as is unfortunately all too often the case in this House, the aim of Mr Wijsenbeek's report is to regulate in a general way a particular situation with which we were faced at the start of this parliamentary term.
Der har været udvalg, som ikke kunne fungere, fordi de ikke var i stand til at vælge et formandskab.
The broad lines of the solution proposed in the report can be approved.
Jeg kan navnlig henvise til tilfældet med delegationen til det blandede udvalg med Tyrkiet, hvor spørgsmålet endte med at blive betragtet som personligt eller partipolitisk, og hvor et tredjeland tilsyneladende også blandede sig, idet Tyrkiet gav udtryk for sin utilfredshed, hvis den formand valgtes, som var blevet udpeget både efter den d'Hondtske metode og på grundlag af forhandlinger.
It provides, first of all, that where the number of nominations corresponds to the number of seats to be filled, the election may take place by acclamation, and that where that is not the case or at the request of one sixth of the members of the committee, the election will take place by secret ballot.
Der blev rejst krav om, at der skulle holdes afstemning om disse to emner, i det ene tilfælde, hvor der ikke var andre kandidater, og hvor der var uoverensstemmelse om resultatet af disse afstemninger. Forretningsordenens bestemmelser var tvetydige. Hr. Wijsenbeek har gjort dem tydelige.
It is not the right time and place to deal with that now, but we give notice that at an appropriate time we will be bringing that issue before the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities, so as to bring in that final emergency brake which is necessary if this House is going to control its delegations' and committees' actions.
Som han anfører, kan en sjettedel af en delegations eller et udvalgs medlemmer nu kræve afstemning, selvom der kun er en kandidat, og kandidaten kan kun vælges i første valgrunde ved absolut flertal.
Whether there is one candidate or more, the election at the first ballot will only be won by obtaining an absolute majority of the votes cast.
I anden runde ændres det absolutte flertal til simpelt flertal, og derfor vil vi fremover være i stand til at sammensætte delegationer, efter at medlemmerne, såfremt de ønsker det, har haft mulighed for at protestere over konsekvenserne af den d'Hondtske metode uden at forsinke Parlamentets arbejde.
The members of the committee will thus still be able to express their opposition to the solution decided by the political groups. Our group welcomes this provision, in the sense that it preserves the voting freedom of each Member.
Vi er altså enige i det positive i at have en nødbremse, selvom jeg på vegne af den socialistiske gruppe må sige, at der stadig mangler en bremse.
I would also like to thank Mr Wijsenbeek for accepting the amendment which I put down on behalf of the EPP Group.
Vi har i øjeblikket ingen procedure for afklaring af situationer, hvor formænd eller næstformænd i udvalg eller delegationer reelt mister tilliden hos medlemmerne i deres udvalg, deres delegation eller her i Parlamentet.
It seemed to us illogical that we should run the risk of further ambiguity, however small that risk might be, in a report which was itself devoted to the clearing-up of ambiguity.
Der er i øjeblikket et tilfælde, hvor formanden for Delegationen for Forbindelserne med Canada har blandet sig i valget i Canada.
Mr Wijsenbeek's service to this House has been to steer a clever and appropriate middle course between the demands of what really happens in this House, which is the d'Hondt system, and clarity in the Rules of Procedure. We are grateful to him on that account.
Fabre-Aubrespy (EDN). - (FR) Hr. formand, Wijsenbeek-betænkningen sigter mod at finde en generel løsning på et specifikt problem, som vi har haft siden begyndelsen af denne valgperiode, hvilket ofte er tendensen her hos os.
On the other hand, where there is more than one candidate and a second ballot proves necessary, the election will be won by obtaining a simple majority.
Løsningen i betænkningen kan vedtages i de store linjer; valg kan således finde sted med akklamation, når antallet af kandidater svarer til antal ledige pladser, og at valg i modsat fald, eller hvis en sjettedel af udvalgets medlemmer ønsker det, finder sted ved hemmelig afstemning, hvilket er almindeligt, når der er tale om personspørgsmål.
We shall only support this approach in full if the final subparagraph of the proposed Rule 142(2) - which provides that where a second ballot is required, new candidates may be nominated - is deleted.
Vi støtter Wijsenbeek-betænkningen, og jeg vil gerne gentage min lykønskning til forfatteren.
That, moreover, is the approach adopted for the election of Parliament's Vice-Presidents, under Rule 15 of the Rules of Procedure.
Udvalgets medlemmer har altså stadig mulighed for at markere deres uenighed i den løsning, som grupperne har besluttet.
In conclusion, I would like to make one remark about the system of attributing a post to the older Member in the case of a tie.
Det er den løsning, vi ønsker, da den bibeholder det enkelte medlems stemmefrihed.
With every day that passes in this House I come to see more and more the attractions of that system.
Jeg ønsker ligeledes at takke hr. Wijsenbeek, fordi han godkendte det ændringsforslag, som jeg udfærdigede på vegne af PPE-Gruppen.
Ephremidis (GUE/NGL). - (EL) Mr President, we support Mr Wijsenbeek's proposal because it deals with a situation that has created problems in connection with the election of Bureaux for parliamentary committees and for delegations to other countries.
Uanset hvor lille risikoen måtte være, forekom det os ulogisk, at vi skulle risikere yderligere tvetydigheder i en betænkning, som havde til formål at udrydde tvetydigheder. Hr. Wijsenbeeks bidrag til dette Parlament har været at holde en klog og rigtig kurs ad den
President. - The next item is the report (A4-0025/96) by Mr Cot, on behalf of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities, on the amendment of Rule 167 of the Rules of Procedure (unfinished business).
Når der til gengæld er flere kandidater, og det derfor bliver nødvendigt med anden valgrunde, vælges den kandidat, der får flest stemmer, i anden runde.
Experience has shown that good faith, the application of the d'Hondt system of determining the distribution, was not enough and very unpleasant problems arose. There
En sådan mulighed, der ikke i sig selv er chokerende, kan naturligvis medføre forskellige mere eller min dre tvivlsomme handlinger, hvis der ikke kræves et absolut tiertal i anden valgrunde.
Cot (PSE), rapporteur. - (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the report which I have the honour of present ing to the House concerns unfinished business at the end of
Det er for øvrigt den løsning, man har lagt sig fast på for valg til Parlamentets næstformand, jvf. forretningsordenens artikel 15.
Cot amendment, but I am sure that this will not be a problem and that we can reach agreement on this point.
Afstemningen finder sted tirsdag kl. 12.00.
a parliamentary term and its fate at the beginning of the next.
Formanden. - Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (A4-0025/96) af Cot for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet om ændring af forretningsordenens artikel 167 om uafsluttede sager.
In its current wording, Rule 167 applies the principle of the clean slate: at the end of each parliamentary term, that is, all consultations, requests for opinions, motions for resolutions and questions are, in principle, deemed to have lapsed.
Det drejer sig på sin vis om en rengøring af forretningsordenens artikel 167.
Some apply a version of the clean slate principle, while others adopt the approach of continuity, for a variety of reasons.
Og lige til sidst, hr. formand, vedrørende ophævelse af immunitet.
I should like to say a final word, Mr President, concerning waivers of immunity.
Spørgsmålet opstod i forbindelse med en an modning om ophævelse af immunitet og blev for øvrigt løst ved at lade præcedens være gældende, det var i forbindelse med de italienske medlemmer, et spørgsmål, der opstod på grund af en ændring i den daværende nationale lovgivning.
This question was raised in connection with a request for the waiver of immunity - which was settled, moreover, by reference to the precedent concerning Italian Members - an issue which had arisen because of the amendment of national legislation in the meantime.
Vi fandt det hensigtsmæssigt at henføre ophævelserne af immunitet til bortfaldne sager.
Our committee felt that requests for the waiver of immunity should be included among the unfinished business deemed to have lapsed.
Problemet med genvalg af et medlem, der er omfattet af parlamentarisk immunitet, og hvis immunitet ønskes ophævet, opstår i en ny sammen hæng.
Undoubtedly, the re-election of a Member who is the subject of a request for the waiver of immunity puts the question in a new context.
Vor holdning, som vi har tilstillet Formandskonferencen, er. at denne skal anmode de nationale myndigheder om at be- eller afkræfte ophævelsen, hvilket ville gøre det lettere for Parlamentet at få et overblik over sagen.
The opinion which we have forwarded to the Conference of Presidents in this respect is that it should ask the relevant national authorities to confirm or otherwise the request for the waiver of immunity, thereby clarifying matters for Parliament as a whole.
Dette princip med at gøre rent bord er noget helt specifikt for Parlamentet.
All this means that a clear-out every five years is welcome.
Medlemsstaternes lovgivning på dette område er temmelig forskellig. Nogle følger samme princip, andre ønsker derimod af forskellige grunde kontinuitet.
I would add that where interinstitutional procedures are concerned, despite the gentlemen's agreements which we have managed to conclude, it is important to safeguard Parliament's rights and ensure that the reduction of the time limits for taking action does not put us in a difficult position.
Evans (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, allerførst ønsker jeg at lykønske min kollega, hr. Cot, for en efter min mening meget entydig, klartseende og for Parlamentet nyttig betænkning.
Evans (PSE). - Mr President, first of all I would like to congratulate my colleague, Mr Cot, for what I think is a very clear, lucid and helpful report for Parliament.
Det er min faste overbevisning, at hvert nyt parlament bør være suverænt og have absolut jurisdiktion over sine egne anliggender.
I believe very firmly that each of Parliament's legislatures must be sovereign in its own right and it must have absolute jurisdiction over its own affairs.
Hvis dette ikke var tilfældet, kunne man retteligen stille spørgsmålstegn ved, hvorfor der i det hele taget skal afholdes valg.
Otherwise, we could question the purpose of having the elections at all.
Vi skal nødvendigvis starte med en renvasket tavle, og derfor er vi enige i princippet om, at uafsluttede anliggender ikke automatisk skal videreføres fra et parlament til et andet.
We have to start with a clean slate, which is why we have the principle that unfinished business should not automatically be carried over from one Parliament to another.
Vedrørende dette princip har Udvalget om Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet altså ingen bemærkninger.
As regards the principle, therefore, the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities has no comments to make.
Men den vil dog gerne forelægge to ændringer, der har til formål at ajourføre vor forretningsorden. orden.
It nevertheless wishes to submit two amendments to the House, the aim of which is to bring our Rules of Procedure up to date.
I praksis er det imidlertid væsentligt at erindre sig, at visse lovgivningsmæssige emner måske allerede er langt fremme.
But in practice, however, it is important to bear in mind that some legislative items could already be well advanced.
Mange parlementsmedlemmer har måske lagt tid, kræfter og energi i disse betænkninger, og der ligger måske en mængde ideer her, uanset hvor langt fremskredne de er.
A lot of Members could have spent time, effort and energy and there could be a lot of ideas in those reports, whatever stage they have reached.
Såfremt der er politisk vilje til atter at påtage sig ansvaret for de betænkninger, bør Parlamentet have mulighed for at fortsætte med dem, naturligvis med det forbehold at Formandskonferencen, som det netop er blevet anført, siger god for det, og såfremt det pågældende korresponderende udvalg ønsker det. Jeg mener imidlertid ikke, at det bør ske automatisk.
If there is the political will to reassume responsibility for those reports, Parliament should have the possibility of continuing with them, subject, of course, as has just been stated, to the approval of the Conference of Presidents and the will of the particular committee responsible.
Den første ændring skyldes de stigende antal nye forhandlingsprocedurer; her tænker jeg selvfølgelig på den fælles beslutningstagning, men også på samarbejde, da den eksisterende bestemmelse i artikel 167 er ældre.
I am thinking, of course, of the codecision procedure, but also of the cooperation procedure, since the current wording of Rule 167 predates the introduction of that procedure. We are proposing to make Rule 167 apply to all unfinished business from now on.
Vi foreslår at medtage alle uafsluttede sager og dermed også alle igangværende procedurer, navnlig ophævelse af immunitet, som jeg kommer tilbage til om lidt.
This would therefore include all procedures under way and in particular - and I shall return to this in a moment - requests for the waiver of immunity.
Hr. Gil-Robles Gil-Delgadoos ændringsforslag er pedandisk.
The amendment from Mr Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado is pedantic.
Hvis det indholdsmæssigt overhovedet er forskelligt fra det oprindelige, så tjener det udelukkende til at lægge mere vægt på muligheden for at videreføre uafsluttede anliggender.
If it does actually differ in substance from the original text it serves only to put more weight on the possibility of carrying over unfinished business.
Som jeg nævnte tidligere, bør dette afvises alene af den årsag, som både jeg og ordføreren har nævnt.
As I said earlier, this should be rejected for the very reasons which both I and the rapporteur have referred to.
Hvert parlament vælges individuelt med mandat fra befolkningen i hver af de 15 medlemsstater.
Each Parliament is elected individually, with a mandate from the people of the 15 Member States.
Derfor bør vi starte hvert nyt parlament med nye anliggender, med en renvasket tavle.
Therefore, we should start again at the beginning of each session with new business, with a new slate.