natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Med hensyn til taksten mener jeg, at vi ikke må fastlægge mere end en overkommelig maksimumtakst.
For toe most part we are in favour of the committee's amendment proposals and will lend our support to them.
Vi har talt lidt om mennesker med særlige behov.
We have talked a bit about people with special needs.
Det bedrøvede mig at høre taleren fra Det Europæiske Folkepartis Gruppe sige, at vi vUle nedgøre handicappede mennesker ved at tilbyde dem særpriser.
I was distressed to hear toe speaker from the Group of the European People's Party say that we would demean disabled people by offering them special tariffs.
Det er slet ikke sådan, jeg ser på det.
I do not see that at all.
Disse mennesker lever med et handicap, og de har ret til at forvente støtte fra os andre og bør have særlige tariffer for en sådan tjenesteydelse.
These people have a disadvantage and are entitled to our support and should get a special tariff for the service.
Mobiltelefonselskaberne eller organisationerne er uhyre lukrative foretagender.
The mobile phone companies or organizations are very profitable.
Det drejer sig om et meget indbringende segment af denne industri, og jeg kan ikke se, hvorfor vi skuUe undlade, mens tid er, at pålægge denne industrigren forsyningspligt og forpligte den til at yde mennesker med et handicap, herunder blinde mennesker, hjælp på særlige betingelser.
This is indeed a profitable segment of the industry and I do not see why we should not oblige it, before it is too late, to make this a universal service, with special conditions to help disabled, handicapped and bUnd people.
Muscardini (NI). - (IT) Hr. formand, vi er principielt enige i ordførerens forslag, herunder særlig de dele af dette, der vedrører beskyttelsen af forbrugeren gennem tjenestens kvalitet, aftalerne om oplysning og bUæggelsen af tvister, Ugesom vi er gunstigt indstillet over for en særlig kategori af brugere, nemlig familierne.
Wolf (V). - (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I believe that we must follow Mrs Read's example in relating this report to the WTO agreement, though toat agreement is even more ambiguous than has previously been pointed out. There is still toe intention, instead of a
Folk med en mobiltelefon bør have ret til at komme med i en telefonbog, hvis de ønsker det, og have den samme ret til ikke at stå i telefonbogen, hvis de ikke vil.
People with a mobile phone should have the right to have an entry in a directory if they wish, with the same right
Så jeg håber, at Europa-Parlamentet vU støtte det princip om forsyningspligt, som Imelda Read har givet en så glimrende fremstilling af.
not to be in the directory if they do not wish. So I hope that this House wiU support toe principle toat Imelda Read has so well explained of having a universal service.
Et andet aspekt, der omhandler forbrugerbeskyttelsen, er det sociale.
As regards the options concerning the universal service, I wonder whether the Commission's proposals are not somewhat more reahstic, in toe short term, than those put forward by Parliament.
Indførelsen af fleksible betalingssystemer for at undgå opsigelser, når de svageste brugere, herunder familier med lavindkomster og eller handicappede er i vanskeligheder, går vi overbevist ind for.
In the long term, we need to arrive at toe proposed solutions but, in the meantime, it would be useful if the Commission could develop some costing forecasts for toe various levels of the universal service.
Blokland (I-EDN). - (NL) Hr. formand, et mere frit marked for telekommunikation resulterer i år 2005 i omkring 1, 3 mio job. Det har et fransk undersøgelsesbureau fundet ud af, ikke inden for telekommunikationssektoren, den vil blive indskrænket.
Blokland (I-EDN). - (NL) Mr President, a more Uberai market for telecommunications wUl create about 1.3 mUlion jobs in the year 2005, according to a French research agency, but not in the telecommunications sector which will see a drop in employment.
Men på grand af forbedrede telekommunikationsteknikker skuUe beskæftigelsen netop stige i andre sektorer.
But improved telecommunications technology will stimulate employment in other sectors.
Det er bemærkelsesværdigt, at private telekommunikationsvirksomheder går ind for Uberalisering, og at statsvirksomheder netop modarbejder denne proces.
It strikes me that private telecommunications firms are in favour of liberalisation and state firms are against this process.
De har åbenbart megen skjult arbejdsløshed at skjule.
They apparently have a lot of hidden unemployment they want to conceal.
Vi må derfor passe på med regler, som har en gunstig virkning på statsvirksomheder.
That is why we must produce regulations which work to the benefit of national ised firms.
Europa-Parlamentet må ikke lade sig vildlede af kortsynede fagforeninger, som kun ser på følgerne for antallet af job i store statsvirksomheder.
The European Parliament should not be misled by toe shortsightedness of trades unions who are only interested in the effects on jobs in big nationalised companies. nies.
For så vidt angår valgmulighederne vedrørende den internationale tjeneste spørger jeg mig selv, om Kommissionens forslag ikke på kort sigt er mere realistiske end Parlamentets. I øjeblikket indebærer en for vid definition af den internationale tjeneste uacceptable omkostninger, der ikke tiUader konkurrencen, at overleve.
It would also be helpful if toe Commission could instigate research on internal relations within the Member States concerning the free market and competition in this sector, respect of the regulations and any illicit profit-making or illegal use of sources.
På langt sigt på vi nå frem til de løsninger, der er foreslået, men i øjeblikket vil det være hensigtsmæssigt, at Kommissionen redegør for de fremtidige omkostninger på de forskellige niveauer af den internationale tjeneste.
The liberalization of telecommunications markets wiU be a highly significant event; if it is to be achieved in full, it is important that the directive we are discussing here, like the others included in toe package, be adopted as soon as possible.
Spørgsmålet om liberaUseringsprocessens forløb beskæftiger vi os med under denne forhandling.
This debate is about the progress of the Uberalisation process: will we meet toe deadline of 1 January 1988?
Kan vi nå det inden den 1. januar 1998? Vi håber ikke, at det går ligesom i postsagen, hvor Frankrig, Tyskland og sydlige medlemsstater vU have liberaliseringen udskudt til 2003.
We hope toat we shall not see a repetition of the post dossier where France, Germany and the southern Member States apparently want to see Uberalisation postponed until 2003.
Kommissionen vil åbenbart medvirke hertil.
The European Commission is apparently going along with this.
Men ved Kommissionen ikke, at jo længere man yenter, desto værre kommer det til at se ud for postsektoren og også telekommunikationsindustrien i Europa.
But does toe Commission not realise toat toe longer one waits the sorrier the state of toe post sector and the telecommunications industry in Europe will become.
Stilstand betyder faktisk her tilbagegang.
To stand still is to backsUde.
EUer risikerer Kommissionen måske en fremtidig parlamentarisk undersøgelse af dens handlemåde inden for telekommunikations- og postsagen.
Either that or the Commission is running the risk of a parliamentary inquiry in toe future into they way it is dealing with the telecommunications and post sector.
Liberalisering er udmærket, men ikke for enhver pris.
Liberalisation is fine, but not at any price.
Med henblik herpå har vi udviklet planen om forsyningspligtydelserne.
That is why we developed the idea of the universal service.
Jeg tror, at denne plan er nem at gennem føre, hvis definitionen ikke udvides alt for meget, for så opretholder vi alligevel monopolstillinger, medens målet er at liberalisere markedet.
I think toat this concept is feasible if it is not defined too broadly, for then we would be keeping monopolies in position whereas toe aim is to liberaUse the market.
ForsyningspUgtydelserne tvinger virksomheder til at betjene hele markedet Og ikke skumme fløden.
Universal service forces companies to serve the whole market and not hive off the best bits.
Men jo mere detaljeret kravene for
But toe more refined the requirements for the universal service the higher the costs of the basic services.
Vi ved, at det vU kræve store
This service is included in the universal service.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
A public variant is therefore unnecessary.
Det er de, fordi vi mener, at den interessante udvikling for mobiltelefoner skyldes konkurrencen og vil nå det mål, som jeg netop nævnede, på en meget mere effektiv måde end nogen anden.
Competition is not served by establishing a uniform fixed price based on costs, nor are consumer interests.
Fru Ewing og fru Read, De må vide, at der ikke findes nogen gratis tjenester. De koster altid noget.
Costs are not an appropriate yardstick; they may be much higher in one Member State because of an inefficient nationalised company there.
investeringer, hvis der virkelig skal være adgang til information i alle dele af Europa.
We know that huge investment is needed in order to have real access to information in all parts of Europe.
Vi ved, hvilke tjenester der hidtil har været, men det er sværere at forudse, hvilke nye tjenester der bliver brug for.
We know what services were available, but it is more difficult for us to predict what will be required in toe future.
Man får ikke noget gratis, og det, som vi nu satser på, er at sikre de gamle tjenester.
There are no 'free lunches' and what we are concentrating on at the moment is guarantee ing old levels of service.
Vi risikerer at tage ressourcer fra den udvikling, som der er . brag for af hensyn til fremtiden.
There is a risk that we will take resources away from necessary future developments.
Det er en udvikling, som bl.a. kan give de handicappede fantastiske muligheder for at komme til at deltage i samfundet på en helt ny måde. Som min kollega Lindqvist sagde, har liberaliseringen givet overordentligt gode resultater i de nordiske lande.
Such development could bring about fantastic opportunities for toe handicapped, for example, to participate in society in a totally new manner.
F.eks. er prisen for langdistancesamtaler i mit hjemland Finland faldet med 70 %, og antallet af telefonbokse er steget med en fjerdedel, siden liberaliseringen blev gen nemført.
For instance, the cost of a long distance call in my native country Finland has gone down by seventy percent and the number of telephone boxes has increased by a quarter since liberalisation was introduced.
Forbrugerne har således haft gavn af liberaliseringen. ringen.
Consumers have benefited from this liberalisation.
Men hvis USA havde fulgt fru Reads politik, var det aldrig lykkedes. Det er lykkedes, fordi de har fulgt den modsatte politik.
We currently have a situation in which different Member States are at different stages of development.
Den nuværende situation er kendetegnet af en meget forskellig udvikling i medlemslandene.
I have expressed a certain amount of concern in my statement from toe Legal Committee which has not been included by the Economic Committee. We would like to
De behøver derfor frihed til selv at afgøre, under hvilken form de vil støtte de handicappede, og efter hvilke regler en sådan støtte skal ydes; støtten kan eksempelvis gives i form af en social ydelse.
We support the rapporteur's proposal to extend application of the regulations concerning consumer protection to users of mobile telephones, though it is obvious toat the directive should not govern mobile telephones, since the fixed
Det er en fejl, vi ikke må begå.
This is a mistake we must not make.
Vi skal vente på, at mobiltelefonen har vundet en stor markedsandel på om kring 30-40 %, før vi pålægger den omkostningerne til en universel tjeneste.
We must wait until mobile telephony has acquired a market share in the region of 30 or 40 % - and then impose universal service charges.
Det sker hurtigt.
It happens very quickly.
Det er lettere at pålægge et direktiv end at skabe et net for ikke at nævne, at det er billigere.
It is easier to impose a directive than to create a network, not to mention the fact toat it is also much cheaper.
Vi har ønsket begrænsninger for, hvornår de nationale myndighedsorganer kan intervenere.
see restrictions on when, national regulatory authorities can intervene.
Vi er klar over, at de nationale myndighedsorganer muligvis ikke er helt frigjorte af monopolerne i enhver henseende.
We know that national regulatory authorities are not always totally free from a monopoly situation.
Derfor er der fare for, at de intervenerer på en diskriminerende måde.
There is a risk, therefore, that they will intervene in a way which is discriminatory.
Endelig tilslutter jeg mig Lindqvists synspunkt, hvorefter mobiltelefonnettene ikke bør være omfattet, da det vil hindre den fremtidige udvikling, som der er behov for.
In conclusion, I would like to support what Mr Lindqvist said, that mobile telephones should not be included, as they wiU stand in toe way of the future developments which we need.
Bangemann, medlem af Kommissionen. - (DE) Hr. for mand, jeg vil tage det op, som min ven Fernand Herman netop sagde.
Bangemann, Member of the Commission. - (DE) Mr President, I can follow on from what my friend Fernand Herman has just said.
Men jeg mener, han gør fra Read uret, når han synes, at hun i den betænkning, hun forelægger i dag, foreslår en politik, som skulle være det stik modsatte af det, der er blevet gjort i USA.
I think, though, that he does Mrs Read an injustice in believing that, in the report she has presented today, she proposes a policy which would be toe precise opposite of what has been done in the USA.
Således opfatter jeg i hvert fald ikke hendes arbejde, selv om jeg er enig i Fernand Hermans principieUe standpunkter.
That at any rate, is not the impression her work makes on me, even though I agree with Fernand Herman in principle.
Jeg vU altså først takke fru Read.
So I should like to start by thanking Mrs Read.
Også fordi hun har måttet arbejde meget hurtigt, skylder vi hende og hele Parlamentet tak.
We owe a debt of gratitude to her, and to toe whole Parliament, especially because she had to work so quickly.
Jeg er ked af, at det er sådan, men De ved alle, at datoen 1. januar næste år lægger pres på os alle.
I regret that but, as you all know, the deadline of 1 January next year is putting pressure on us all.
Desværre må jeg sige Dem, at jeg ikke kan love Dem, at det er sidste gang, vi taler om ONP eller om alle de emner, vi har talt om i de forløbne år, for konvergensen - både den teknologiske og den økonomiske konvergens - vU medføre en sammenføring af alle disse markeder, der hidtil har været adskilt, og det vil naturligvis tvinge os til nye tiltag.
I am sorry to have to tell you that I cannot promise that this will be toe last time we discuss ONP and all toe other subjects we have talked about in past years, because convergence - both technological and economic - will bring together all of these previously separate markets, and of course toat will compel us to adopt new approaches.
Herman (PPE). - (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, med det, der sker på verdensplan, viser WTO-forhandlingerne, at Europa gjorde ret i at være på forkant med begivenhederne. Vi må derfor bifalde, hvad Kommissionen og Europa-Parlamentet har gjort; for uden dem ville vi aldrig have fået liberaliseret telefonmarkederne.
In essence, we in this Parliament are agreed - and I congratulate Mrs Read - on toe problems of competition and price transparency, the need to set reasonable prices, and the fact that there must be a universal service to protect the consumer.
Vi må under strege, at det er mod medlemsstaterne og med hjælp af de instrumenter, Traktaten giver os, at vi er kommet frem til de relativt tilfredsstillende resultater, vi står over for i dag.
However, toat is not our subject today. Our subject today is first if you like, the fundamental question of the various policies and secondly a subject involving very practical conclusions.
Vi må aldrig glemme, at hvis det ikke havde været for Kommissionen, hvis det ikke havde været for Parlamentet, ville vi i dag have stået over for femten fuldstændig lukkede telekommunikationsmarkeder med femten monopoler eller noget i den retning.
But since toe practical conclusions are them selves inevitably somewhat dependent on what is regarded as being right in principle, a valuable first step is to verify once again, by reference to what Mrs Read and others, and Fernand Herman too, have said whether our fundamental approach is right.
Sådan ser situationen ud, og det må vi ikke glemme.
This situation is perceived as an improvement on a public sector monopoly.
Vi er enige om konkurrenceproblemerne, nødvendigheden af at få fastsat nogle fornuftige priser, og at der skal være en universel tjeneste, som beskytter forbrugerne.
The question which greatly divides us today is whether we should, as of now, make the mobile telephone subject to the same regulation as that envisaged for the fixed telephone.
På hvilke punkter er vi da uenige?
This is where opinions differ.
Uenighederne skal alt andet lige findes på det praktiske plan.
If we try at this stage to impose on operators toe burdens of the universal service, it will result in a fatal price increase.
Men det er ikke det, vi skal tale om i dag.
I can remember back to toe beginning of the liberalization debate.
Vi skal i dag på den ene side, om man vil, tale om det principielle spørgsmål om de forskellige politikker og på den anden side om de praktisk konklusioner.
But -because I myself was a target for the attacks and because it 'always amuses me, so I remember it clearly - in the early debates the issue really was: are deregulation and liberalization even possible at all, or are they just fantasies conjured up by these ultra-liberals?
Men da de praktiske konklusioner altid også afhænger lidt af, hvad man principielt anser for rigtigt, er det nyttigt, dersom vi på grundlag af det, fru Read, andre og tillige Fernand Herman sagde, endnu en gang sikrer os, at vort principielle udgangspunkt er rigtigt.
And now, thank God, and I say that not with the arrogance of someone who was right all along but simply because the result is a good one, everyone can see that the ultimate result of liberalization, when you draw the bottom line and add up the pros and cons, brings major advantages for toe consumer, in par-
Målet er det samme: Vi ønsker, at flest mulige borgere har adgang til kvalitetsydelser til den laveste pris.
Mrs Read said, 'I hope that European citizens wiU very soon be able to enjoy toe same services at toe same price as the citizens of the United States.'
Men hvor dan gør vi det?
But if toe United States had foUowed Mrs Read's poUcy, it would never have arrived where it is.
Hvis man pludselig afbrydes af reklamer, det ville helt bestemt genere fru Lulling og mig.
Bangemann tïcular, and that gives me great satisfaction.
Men det er jo ikke det afgørende. Det afgørende er: Hvis nogen vil, kan de telefonere gratis, de behøver overhovedet ikke at betale noget.
Because toe fact that we can now operate with lower tariffs, not only for data transmission but also, especially, for toe telephone service, has become obvious.
Der er naturligvis be stemte former for handicap, der kræver en teknisk løsning, det er rigtigt.
And that should be our starting point.
Det betyder altså, at De ikke skal behandle problemet den universelle adgang som et problem, der først og fremmest skal løses ad socialpolitisk vej.
What I mean, then, is that you should not regard the problem of universal access as being mainly one to be solved through social policy.
Det vil først og fremmest blive løst ved hjælp af udviklingen i teknikken og på markedet.
It is mainly one to be solved by technological advances and toe development of toe market.
Konkurrencen fører også her til, at priserne falder og kvaliteten øges.
Here, as elsewhere, competition means that prices fall and quality rises.
Det betyder ikke - og det er Kommissionen heUer aldrig gået ind for - at vi nu kan overlade konkurrencen til sig selv, for naturligvis bliver man nødt til at regulere bestemte ting, som netop ticke følger af konkurrencen.
That is not to say - nor has the Commission ever said - that we should now leave competition to ran itself; of course there is a need to regulate certain matters which do not automatically arise from competition.
Det store spørgsmål, vi igen og igen står overfor, lyder: Hvad følger af konkurrencen, og hvad skal man regulere?
The great question that always confronts us is: what arises automaticaUy from competition and what has to be regulated?
Og hvis man vil regulere det, da hvorledes?
And, if it has to be regulated, then how?
Det er meget vanskeligt at forudsige, fordi den tekniske udvikling jo her går hånd i hånd med konkurrencen og mange ting er helt anderledes end normalt i erhvervslivet. Det har jeg gjort opmærksom på.
This is very difficult to predict, because technological develop ment goes hand in hand with competition here, and many things are quite different from what they usually are in industry.
Jeg er af den overbevisning, at vi især i forbindelse med dominerende stiUing på markedet absolut stadig har behov for regulering.
I am convinced that there certainly is a continuing need for regulation, especially in the case of positions of market dominance.
Og her dukker jo tillige spørgsmålet op, om ikke de, der udbyder mobile telefonitjenester skal behandles anderledes.
And toe question toat arises here is: should mobile telephone suppliers not be treated differently?
Skal man ikke gå asymmetrisk frem, dvs. belaste den, der har et fast net, et faktisk monopol og aflaste dem, der udbyder mobile telefonitjenester, de nys tilkomne på markedet?
Do we not need to adopt an asymmetrical procedure, penalizing toe supplier who has a fixed network, a de facto monopoly, and making things easier for toe mobile phone operators, the newcomers to the market?
Oprindelig anså vi også denne tese for at være rigtig.
Originally we thought this was toe right approach.
I mellemtiden overvejer vi, om man ikke kan indgrænse det.
Now we are wonder ing whether we may not be able to restrict it.
F.eks. bør man behandle begge parter ens i spørgsmålet om optagelse i abonnentfortegnelser.
For example, both should be treated equally when it comes to entries in the telephone directory.
Derfor vil vi også acceptere det ændringsforslag.
So that motion for an amendment can be accepted.
Og det ene eUer det andet, som nok skal være ens for begge parter, bør vi også regulere således her i dag.
And there are other things we should regulate here today, which must certainly be the same for both.
Det er imidlertid rigtigt, at den, der råder over et sådant fast net, for øjeblikket naturligvis stadig har en uhyre konkurrence mæssig fordel.
But it is right of course, toat anyone who has this kind of permanent network still has an enormous competitive advantage at present.
Vi prøver jo på at regulere det, idet adgangen til nettet også reguleres af os.
We are trying to regulate that, by regulating access to the network.
Det er jo ikke sådan, at vi bare lader det være ureguleret.
It is not true to say that we are simply leaving it unregulated.
Og her vil der også for fremtiden - vi skal jo også behandle hr. Hoppenstedts betænkning - komme konkurrence mellem nettene.
And, here again, there will in future be competition between networks, and we will still have to deal with Mr Hoppenstedt's report.
Lad os endnu en gang se på spørgsmålet »den universelle tjeneste«.
Now let us go back to the question of the 'universal service'.
Udbuddets art og arten af de omkostninger, der opstår her, tvinger alle udbydere til at lave et udbud, der er så bredt som muUgt.
The. nature of toe product range and the nature of the costs arising compel every suppUer to offer as wide a range as possible.