natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det er også noget pjat ikke at vide i hvert medlemsland, hvem der faktisk er ansvarlig for velfærdsanliggender.
This has benefits both for the farmers and the slaughterers, in terms of the value added nature of such an activity and the provision of jobs, as well as the animal welfare aspects.
Det varierer fra land til land, hvilken myndighed - lokal, national, offentlig, frivillig - der er ansvarlig. Dette skal være nedskrevet, så vi kan overvåge tingene grundigt.
The only humane solution is to replace the trade in live animals with a carcass trade.
Endelig beder vi også om, at chaufførerne skal have mulighed for at blive oplært i dyrepasning, så de i det mindste kan se og diagnosticere dyr, når de lider under stress.
Finally, we are also asking for vehicle drivers to be given the opportunity of being trained in animal husbandry so that they can at least recognize and diagnose animals when they are under stress.
Jeg håber, at vi får mindst 260 stemmer på onsdag og sender en meget klar besked til et meget modvilligt Råd om hele sagen.
I hope that we have at least 260 votes on Wednesday and send a very clear message to a very reluctant Council on this whole issue.
Ifølge Maastricht-Traktaten har vi nye beføjelser.
As it currently stands, it does little to safeguard the welfare of animals involved.
Jeg vil gerne slutte med at takke udvalgets personale for deres hjælp ved udarbejdelsen af min betænkning.
It covers maximum journey times, feeding and watering intervals, resting periods, space allowances and standards for livestock vehicles.
SIMMONDS (PPE), ordfører. - (EN) Hr. formand, min betænkning og denne forhandling blev fremskyndet som følge af kommissionsformanden Jacques Delors forslag i Edinburgh, om at dyrevelfærdsanliggender skulle falde ind under nærhedsprincippet.
SIMMONDS (PPE), rapporteur. - Mr President, my report and this debate were precipitated by the suggestion by the President of the Commission, Mr Delors, at Edinburgh that animal welfare matters should be subject to the principle of subsidiarity.
Med andre ord foreslog han, at de skulle afgøres på nationalt niveau.
In other words, he suggested that they should be decided at national level.
Jeg må sige, at jeg ikke har truffet mange, der er enig med ham.
I have to say that I have found very few people who would agree with him.
Denne forhandling blev også fremskyndet af, at Kommissionen hidtil har været ude af stand til at foretage kontrol eller inspektion af velfærdsanliggender.
This debate was also precipitated by the fact that the Commission so far has been unable to make any checks or inspections on welfare matters.
Hr. Steichen indrømmede dette i det skriftlige svar han gav på spørgsmål nr. 1131 i juli i år, da han sagde, at Fællesskabets veterinære og phytosanitære inspektionskontrol også er ansvarlig for at kontrollere overholdelse af bestemmelserne om dyrebeskyttelse.
Mr Steichen admittea as much in the written answer he gave to Question No 1131 in July this year when he said that the Community's Veterinary and Phytosanitary Inspection Office is also responsible for checking compliance with the provisions on animal protection.
Men han sagde, at antallet af inspektører til rådighed er så lille i forhold til aktivitetsområdet, at det ikke endu har været muligt at foretage sådanne kontroller.
However, he said, the number of inspectors available is so small in relation to its field of activity that it has not yet been possible to make such checks.
Nogle af os mener imidlertid, at der bør anlægges en anden synsvinkel/strategi.
In the worst cases, a substantial number of animals die during very long journeys.
Hr. Simmonds går således en smule videre end direktivet om beskyttelse af dyr under transport og længere end Kommissionens ændrede for slag, for så vidt som han fremsætter nogle mere vidtrækkende krav i forhold til direktiverne.
In the report drawn up under Article 13, the Commission summarizes the situation as follows: 'Long distance transport in overstocked vehicles, combined with dehydration and starvation, results in very poor welfare and often high mortality.'
Ja, jeg kan ikke se pointen i at have nogen lovgivning om dyrevelfærd, for ikke at tale om mere lovgivning, med mindre vi får denne lovgivning implementeret af med lemslandene og håndhævet rigtigt.
Well, I cannot see any point at all in having any legislation on the subject of animal welfare, let alone having more legislation, unless we are going to have that legislation implemented by the Member States and properly policed.
Derfor er jeg glad for, at det eneste ændringsforslag til min betænkning forsøger at genindføre et punkt, som Landbrugsudvalget fjernede, og dette punkt søger at sikre, at der er tilstrækkeligt med personale til at begynde at foretage inspektioner, og om nødvendigt foretage retsforfølgelse under de nye beføjelser i Maastricht-Traktaten.
Therefore, I am very pleased that the one amendment to my report seeks to put back a paragraph taken out in the Committee on Agriculture and that paragraph seeks to ensure that there is adequate staff to start making inspections and, if necessary, prosecutions under our new powers in the Maastricht Treaty.
Direktivet indeholder nogle bestemmelser herom, og det er eventuelt tilstrækkeligt, at vi kræver, at disse bestemmelser opfyldes.
The proposed rules are welcome if they are properly monitored and enforced, and could lead to some improvement in welfare during transport.
Jeg tror, vi ikke har nået vort mål tidligere, fordi vi ikke har sat en fornuftig, praktisk og gennemførlig tidsplan for gennemførelsen af vore krav.
The Scientific Veterinary Committee has in fact omitted to improve the feeding and watering intervals for sheep and for goats.
Jeg tror helt ærligt, at vi ikke kan stille handelen i Fællesskabet på hovedet fra den ene dag til den anden ved for eksempel at indføre et forbud mod langturstransport meget hurtigt.
For example, from my constituency we export something like 350,000 sheep every year, but sheep have been left out of the equation completely.
Vi kan ikke skabe kaos for vore slagterier på én gang ved et øjeblikkeligt forbud mod langturstran
What I am requesting in this case is that the benefit of the doubt should not be given to the Scientific Veterinary Committee to come up with another report, but rather the benefit of the doubt should be given to the sheep themselves.
Noget lignende kan siges om betænkningen af hr. Morris.
This is the third report I have presented to Parliament on this subject.
At hævde, at behandlingen af dyrene på slagterierne generelt er præget af ligegyldighed og endog grusomhed er efter vores mening en overdrivelse, ligesom det er en utilladelig overdrivelse at hævde, at Kommissionen ikke interesserer sig for spørgsmål vedrørende dyrs velfærd.
I believe we have failed to achieve our ends before because we have failed to provide a sensible, practical and enforceable timetable to implement our requests.
Hvis kødmarkedet nødvendiggør transport over store afstande, skal dyrene transporteres i slagtet tilstand.
the view that the Commission has no interest in questions of animal welfare.
Vi har i dag alle tekniske muligheder for at oprette kølekæder til transport af slagtede dyrekroppe til fjerntliggende mål.
In this connection I stressed in committee, and I have again stressed today in plenary, the need not to go beyond what it is possible to require of the Community today.
Om problematikken i forbindelse med den alt for snævre plads under transporten har hr. Morris allerede sagt en del.
Secondly, I believe we must insist that animals imported into the Community are subject to the same restrictions on transport and welfare as within the Member States.
Han har også vist film i Europa-Parlamentet, som gør det klart for alle dem, der ikke interesserer sig synderligt for dette spørgsmål, at det ikke kan fortsætte på denne måde.
We have all heard ghastly stories of horses being trans ported into the Community from as far away as east of Moscow.
SELIGMAN (PPE). - (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil geme lykønske Richard Simmonds og David Morris med deres førsteklasses betænkninger, som virkelig udtrykker alle målene for vor Tværpolitiske Gruppe om Dyrebeskyttelse, som jo har gjort en afgørende indsats for at forbedre dyrenes skæbne i Europa og verden.
SELIGMAN (PPE). - Mr President, I would like to congratulate Richard Simmonds and David Morris on their first-class reports, which really express the full objectives of our Animal Welfare Intergroup, which has incidentally done vital work in improving the fate of animals in Europe and the world.
Europa-Parlamentet har gjort et fantastisk arbejde vedrørende dyrenes vel færd.
The European Parliament has done marvellous work in animal welfare.
Det er sandsynligvis den førende fortaler for dyre velfærd i hele Europa.
It is probably the leading animal welfare promoter in the whole of Europe.
Dyrevelfærd har vist sig at være et vigtigt politisk spørgsmål, fordi en stor del af vælgerskaren i stigende grad har dyr som livsledsagere i alderdommen, når de har mistet deres koner og mænd. Dyr er vidunderlige, ukritiske, tillidsfulde venner, og de fortjener vor omsorg til gengæld.
Animal welfare has proved to be an important political issue, because a large proportion of the electorate are turning more and more to animals as companions in their old age, when their wives and husbands have been taken away from them.
Jeg anmoder Dem derfor om at støtte det af Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse stillede ændringsforslag, ifølge hvilket dyr undervejs til slagteriet ikke må transporteres i mere end otte timer. Jeg ved, at dette emne er genstand for diskussion også i min egen gruppe, men det ville glæde mig meget, dersom Europa-Parlamentet kunne opvise et klart flertal for denne bestemmelse.
Turning to other aspects of my report, likewise there are a number of disgraceful practices and nonsenses that we have to end, such as the practice of stunning animals with screwdrivers in slaughterhouses in southern Europe or the nonsense of having higher subsidies for the export of live animals than we do for the export of meat on the hook.
Hr. Simmonds krævede større beføjelser til Fællesskabet, når Maastricht- og Rom-Traktaterne revideres i 1996.
Mr Simmonds calls for a greater competence for the Community when the Maastricht and Rome Treaties are revised in 1996.
Det er ikke nok, at dyrenes velfærd kun overvejes, når lovgivning behandles, som der står i Maastricht-protokollen.
It is not enough that animal welfare is just considered when legislation is being considered, as it says in the Maastricht protocol.
Parlamentet er ikke indstillet på at få sine hensigter tilsidesat og ignoreret af Rådet, når det passer det.
This Parliament is not prepared to have its intentions overruled or ignored by the Council just when it pleases.
Punkt 5 i hr. Simmonds betænkning beklager, at Kom missionen og Rådet ikke erkender den vigtige rolle, som Parlamentet har spillet og altid vil spille ved formuleringen af en politik for dyrebeskyttelse.
Paragraph 5 of Mr Simmonds' report regrets that the Commission and Council do not acknowledge the important role which Parliament has played and will always play in formulating animal welfare policy.
Hvis Rådet fortsæt ter med at behandle os så overlegent, vil vi oparbejde en så voldsom reaktion i offentligheden, at Rådet ikke vil vide, hvad der har ramt det.
If the Council continues to take this highhanded policy against us, we will marshall such a tremendous public reaction that the Council will not know what has hit it.
VERBEEK (V). - (NL) Hr. formand, det er takket været medierne, som har vist disse billeder på skærmen, og takket været offentlighedens reaktioner, dens vrede og dens forargelse, at vi som Parlament endelig forsøger at gøre noget ved transport af slagtedyr. Denne transport er big business, den er en industri.
COLINO SALAMANCA (PSE). - (ES) Mr President, I should like to begin by stating that all the Socialists in the Committee on Agriculture share the concerns expressed by Mr Simmonds and Mr Morris in their respective reports, and that there is a general concern with regard to these matters.
Endelig skal Fællesskabet, som hr. Simmonds siger, have nok ressourcer til at betale eksperter til at overvåge og håndhæve lovgivning om dyrevelfærd i alle tolv medlem slande.
Finally, the Community must, as Mr Simmonds says, have enough resources to pay expert staff to monitor and enforce animal welfare legislation throughout our twelve Member States.
Vi kan ikke gøre nogen undtagelse.
We cannot make any exceptions.
Vi kan ikke have artige elever i nord og uartige i syd.
We cannot have good boys in the north and bad boys in the south.
Vi må håndhæve denne lovgivning.
We have to enforce this legislation.
VOHRER (LDR). - (DE) Hr. formand, vor forhandling i dag om transport af dyr drejer sig om de to betænkninger af Morris og Simmonds.
VOHRER (LDR). - (DE) Mr President, today's debate on the transport of animals encompasses both the Morris and the Simmonds reports.
Egentlig havde jeg geme set, om emnet havde været endnu bredere formuleret, for transport af dyr og hygiejnebestemmelser for kød og dermed slagteristrukturen hænger meget snævert sammen.
I would really have liked to see the scope of the debate extended, as the transport of animals and meat hygiene requirements, and thus the structure of the slaughterhouses, are very closely linked.
For det andet, hvad mener De om hr. Morris ændringsforslag nr. 5, om de otte timer?
However, it is true that some of us believe that a different strategy should be adopted in dealing with these issues.
Hr. Morris selv vil jeg gerne spørge: når De siger, at det går an i fem dage, hvad opnår vi så med det? Det er naturligvis bedre end uafbrudt transport, nat og dag, men fem dage, otte timer, det er rent faktisk igen fyrre timer.
To put it simply, the report by Mr Morris goes a little further than the actual directive on the transport of animals and the change proposed by the Commission, since it goes beyond the requirements of those directives.
Kan De stadig påtage Dem ansvaret for dette? Kunne De ikke sløjfe de fem dage?
And we have already stated that this does not seem to us to be the best way forward, because it is acknowledged -as Mr Morris himself does in his report and as he has again stated today - that there are gaps in compliance with the current directive.
Hr. formand, til slut, hvis der så absolut skal transporteres, og vi vælger slagtet kød, så mener jeg, at denne transport også bør belægges med en høj økoafgift, fordi noget sådant er også usædvanlig miljøfjendtligt.
We think that to increase obligations does not solve the problem, and that perhaps it would be much better to comply with the current directive as amended by the Commission, rather than adding new obligations concerning the matter we are debating.
GRUND (NI). - (DE) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, som en del af den fælles landbrugspolitik, således citeres i Kommissionens meddelelse en afgørelse fra Dom stolen, falder dyreværn udelukkende ind under Fælles skabets kompetence.
In this regard, for example, he referred to the need to train the drivers who transport these animals.
Nej, mine damer og herrer, dyr er ikke kun landbrugsprodukter, som der står i begrundelsen, men levende væsener!
The directive itself already contains some regulations on this matter, and perhaps it would be sufficient to insist that they are complied with.
Udformer vi nemlig bestemmelserne vedrørende slagte rierne meget restriktivt, opstår der lange transportveje.
The fact is that if we organize the provisions governing slaughterhouses very restrictively, then there will be transport over long distances.
Jeg forstår udmærket den landmand, der ønsker en god pris for sin kødproduktion - okser, svin og får - og derfor agter at sælge dem dér, hvor han får den bedste pris.
I have a lot of sympathy for a farmer who wants to get a good price for his meat products - cattle, pigs and sheep - and wants therefore to sell them where he can get the best price.
Men jo mere spredt slagterierne ligger, jo længere bliver transporten af dyrene.
But the more scattered the slaughterhouses, the greater the distances animals will have to be transported.
Går vi ind for korte transporter, har vi følgelig brug for en decentral slagteristruktur.
If therefore what we want is transport over short distances, we need a decentralized slaughterhouse structure.
Vil vi have en mere omfattende dyrebeskyttelse, bliver vi nødt til at have dette for øje.
If we want furtherreaching animal protection, we have to bear this in mind.
I øvrigt kan jeg meget bedre lide det udtryk, der på engelsk svarer til »dyrebeskyttelse«, nemlig animal welfare, dyrenes velbefindende, end det nævnte ord.
By the way, I am far happier with the English expression for 'animal protection', namely 'animal welfare' than with its German equivalent.
Vi bør her endvidere endnu en gang gøre det klart, at vi skelner mellem de dyr, der transporteres til slagteriet, og avlsdyr.
We need again to make it clear that we are making a distinction between animals being transported to slaughterhouses and animals for breeding.
For sidstnævntes vedkommende kan jeg godt se, at lange transportveje må tages med i købet og at de i betænkningerne nævnte pauser og bestemmelser er nødvendige.
In the case of the latter, I realize that transport over long distances has to be accepted and that the breaks
Dyrenes behov for beskyttelse afledes dermed heller ikke kun af den produktivitetsstigning i landbruget, der har at gøre med beskyttelsen af dem, men er af fundamental natur. Dyr har krav
To generalize by affirming without further qualification that standards of care are unacceptably low in many abbatoirs seems to us an exaggeration, as does
GRUND på at blive beskyttet mod smerter, fordi de som vi er levende væsener, der kan føle smerte.
VOHRER and provisions mentioned in the reports are therefore necessary. But the journey to the slaughterhouse should be short.
Det betyder endvidere, at dyreværn er mere end det, der er begrundet i den fælles landbrugspolitik.
That also means that animal welfare implies more than emerges from the Common Agricultural Policy.
Sidstnævnte kan kun være basis for mindstenormer.
That can only provide the basis for minimum standards.
føres ud i livet. Parlamentet foreslår ganske vist forbedringer, for så vidt angår begrænsning af transporttiden for kvæg til slagteriet og mindstenormer for fodring og vanding, men de mangler, for så vidt angår den omstændighed, at Kommissionen tildeler sig selv beføjelser.
In addition, we should make it clear that horses, cows, pigs and sheep are not, in our view, goods or agricultural products but living things towards which we have a responsibility so that we have to ensure that the rules are complied with.
Det foreliggende lovforslag giver derfor kun meget lidt håb om, at der derigennem opnås forbedringer for de væsener, der lider.
If the market in meat requires that large distances have to be covered, then animals should be transported after slaughter.
De principielle overvejelser om dyre værn er, hvad angår virkningerne deraf i praksis, et lille skridt i den rigtige retning. Men begrundelsen er nærmest kynisk.
My colleague, Mr Morris, has already spoken about the excessively cramped conditions of transport.
Hvad de praktiske punkter angår, har parlamentsmedlem mer med de mest forskelligartede politiske tilhørsforhold ganske vist sjældent været så enige som i kravet om, at transport af dyr til slagteriet ikke må vare længere end otte timer.
As far as the practical aspects are concerned, honourable Members of the most varied persuasions have rarely been so united as they are in calling for the transport of animals for slaughter to be limited to eight hours.
Og hvad foreslår Kommissionen så?
But what is the Commission now proposing?
Et direktivforslag uden begrænsning af transporttiden, ifølge hvilket okser f.eks. må transporteres i seksten timer uden vand og i 24 timer uden foder.
A proposal for a directive that does not restrict the period of transport, and under which, for example, cattle can be transported without water for 16 hours and without food for 24 hours.
Der er slet ingen bestemmelser desangående deri for fårs vedkommende, fordi der angiveligt mangler videnskabelige undersøgelser deraf.
It does not contain any provisions at all on sheep, allegedly because no scientific tests have been carried out.
Hvor mange får, dét spørger jeg nu Kommissionen om, skal endnu ynkeligt dø af tørst i sommerens gloende hede, inden der foreligger tilstrækkeligt videnskabelige grundlag til at erkende, at de er levende dyr, som i lighed med os mennesker har brug for næring og vand.
How many sheep, let me ask the Commission, must die miserably of thirst in blazing summer temperatures before there is enough scientific evidence to establish that they are living creatures and need, like us, food and water.
KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT (PPE). - (DE) Hr. for mand, mine damer og herrer, med hensyn til dette emne kan producenter og forbrugere slet ikke forstå, at vi skal bruge flere år til drøftelser, før vi når frem til en fornuftig ordning.
I would therefore ask you to support the amendment tabled by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection which seeks to ensure that animals should not be transported for more than eight hours en route to slaughterhouses.
Fra landbrugets side hilses alle foranstaltninger med henblik på afhjælpning af mulige misforhold i forbindelse med dyretransporter principielt velkomne.
VERBEEK (V). - (NL) Mr President, it is due to the media which has brought these facts to our television screens and to public reaction of fury and indignation that we in this House are at long last trying to do something about the transport of animals for slaughter.
Men først og fremmest skal transport afstandene generelt være så korte som muligt.
The White Paper says that we should build more roads in Europe, and therefore drive more miles.
Den maksimale transporttid skal efter min mening kontrolleres bedre end bestemmelserne om fodring og vanding.
It is grotesque that the Commission itself has not had sufficient courage to lay down specific time restrictions for the transport of animals in its draft.
Hvem af de tilstedeværende har nogensinde i en temperatur på 30°C i seksten timer undværet enhver form for væskeindtagelse for at finde ud af, hvilke pinsler okser i givet fald udsættes for?
Who among you has then refrained from drinking anything for 16 hours in temperatures of 30" in order to experience the suffering animals may be expected to tolerate?
Ikke uden grund gjorde filosoffen Kant opmærksom på, at dyrplageri afstumper menne skets medfølelse med dyrenes lidelser.
The philosopher Kant was right to point out that torturing animals inures man to their suffering.
Derfor er det menneskets pligt over for sig selv at undlade dyrplageri eller sagt mere moderne: Den, der piner dyr, piner også mennesker.
We therefore have a duty to ourselves to stop torturing animals. To put it in more modern terms: those who torture animals torture people.
Da et menneske med hjertet på rette sted slet ikke er i stand til at begå slige grusomme handlinger, anvender man forråede, skrupelløse mennesker til at udføre disse handlinger.
Since people with any sensitivity are incapable of such cruelty, completely brutalized and unscrupulous characters are used to carry out these activities.
Alt dette sker, fordi nogle menneskers begær efter profit vejer tungere end millioner af dyrs pinsler og lidelser.
All of this happens because some people's desire for profit counts for more than the torture and suffering of millions of animals.
Det må i denne forbindelse beklages, at der heller ikke i det foreliggende direktiv er medtaget absolutte begrænsninger af transporttiden for dyr, der skal slagtes.
I see the Commission chortling, please, be my guest, but the Commission should realize that what often happens to animals in road transport is nothing short of a calamity.
Bevares eksportgodtgørelsen for levende dyr til slagtning, bør udbetalingen efter min mening gøres afhængig af dyrenes tilstand på bestemmelsesstedet.
We are a civilized people in Europe and public opinion will strongly condemn what the Commission is doing.