natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Formanden. - Mine damer og herrer, hvis De fortsætter på den måde, får vi heller ikke tid til stemmeforklaringer ne ved afslutningen af denne afstemningstid.
President. - Ladies and gentlemen, if you continue in this fashion we will not even have time for the explanations of vote at the end of voting time.
Derfor foreslår jeg, at vi nu stemmer og så benytter lejligheden til at lytte til Deres stemmeforklaringer.
I therefore propose that we vote now and then take the opportunity to hear your explanations of vote.
Jeg vil gerne takke formanden for Parlamentet for den eminente måde, forhandlingerne er blevet ført på, og navnlig takke alle de kolleger, som var med i Forligsudvalget.
Amendment No 3, which was to guarantee to timeshare purchasers that the right applicable in their country of residence to sign a contract in another country would apply if that right was applied in the home country, could not be maintained.
Vi fik gjort noget for vore borgere, fordi vi optrådte som et team på tværs af parti- og landegrænser.
International private law, the Com mission and the Council were against it.
Jeg går ud fra, at Parlamentet er indforstået med, at vi nu går direkte til afstemningen.
I would ask you, ladies and gentlemen, to endorse the findings of the Conciliation Committee.
(Det fælles udkast godkendtes) vedtoges mødekalenderen
I assume that the House agrees and that we can now move on to the vote.
(Ved successive afstemninger for 1995) (')
(In successive votes Parliament approved the calendar of partsessions for 1995) (')
Fabre-Aubrespy (EDN). - (FR) Hr. formand, jeg har faktisk for lidt siden bedt om ordet tre gange. Jeg har ikke fået det.
Fabre-Aubrespy (EDN). - (FR) Mr President, I asked for the floor three times just now, but was not allowed to speak.
Jeg har en bemærkning til forretningsordenen og mere præcist til artikel 29 i denne, der vedrører de politiske gruppers og deres medlemmers og derfor hvert af medlemmerne af forsamlingens ret.
I should like to raise a point of order regarding Rule 29 of the Rules of Procedure, which concerns the rights of political groups and their members, and there fore of each and every Member of this House.
Forslag til afgørelse (B4-0087/94) af Green for De Europæiske Socialdemokraters Gruppe, Martens for Det Europæiske Folkepartis Gruppe (Den Kristelig-Demo-kratiske Gruppe), De Vries for ELDR-Gruppen, Puerta for GUE-Gruppen, Ligabue for FE-Gruppen, Pasty for Gruppen for Europæisk Demokratisk Alliance, Roth for De Grønne i Europa-Parlamentet, Lalumière for ARE-Gruppen, Bonde for EN-Gruppen om ændring af udvalgenes talmæssige sammensætning
Proposal for a decision (B4-0087/94) by Mrs Green, on behalf of the Group of the Party of European Socialists, Mr Martens, on behalf of the Group of the European People's Party (Christian-Democratic Group), Mr De Vries, on behalf of the Group of the European Liberal Democratic and Reformist Party, Mr Puerta, on behalf of the Confederal Group of the European United Left, Mr Ligabue, on behalf of the Forza Europa Group, Mr Pasty, on behalf of the Group of the European Democratic Alliance, Mrs Roth, on behalf of the Green Group in the European Parliament, Mrs Lalumière, on behalf of the Group of the European Radical Alliance and Mr Bonde, on behalf of the Europe of Nations Group (Coordination Group), on the change of membership of parliamentary committees
Der har lige før været en episode, hvis indhold jeg ikke vil komme tilbage til: Formanden for Forretningsordensudvalget har på en udmærket måde fortalt, hvad det drejede sig om, og i referatet kunne enhver se, hvilket formål debatten havde.
A short while ago, a vote was held, the subject of which I shall not go into. The chairman of the Rules Committee summarized the matter perfectly well, and anyone can read what the debate was about in the Minutes.
Afstemningen foregik meget hurtigt, hvilket jeg gerne vil sige har chokeret mig personligt.
However, the vote was taken extremely quickly, and I must say that that surprised me.
Forslag til beslutning (B4-0113/94) af Cornelissen for Transportudvalget om den i juli 1994 forelagte beretning fra Undersøgelsesudvalget om Vejgodstransport i Det Indre Marked
Motion for a resolution (B4-0113/94) by Mr Cornelissen, on behalf of the Committee on Transport, on the report of July 1994 from the Committee of Enquiry on the transport of goods by road in the European single market
Jeg vil også gerne sige, at som nyt medlem af Parlamentet er jeg meget forbavset, for ikke at sige forarget, når jeg hører fru Dury, lige som formanden for den største gruppe i vores forsamling, rejse tvivl om en politisk gruppe fra et demokratisk land, der er behørigt konstitueret ligesom de grupper, som vi er medlemmer af, og nægte den retten til at eksistere.
(Parliament adopted the resolution) the largest group in this House, call into a question a political group which has been properly constituted and comes from a democratic country, in the same way as the groups to which we all belong, and deny it the right to exist.
Jeg vil helt enkelt gerne sige, at vores venner i Forza Europa er medlemmer af vores forsamling.
I would just like to say that our colleagues in the Forza Europa Group are Members of this Parliament.
Fru formand, De har sagt, at vi har sæde i en politisk institution, og at det er grunden til, at De nægter medlemmerne af Forza Europa retten til at arbejde her.
You said, Madam Chairman, that the European Parliament was a political institution; and, for that reason, you denied the members of the Forza Europa Group the right to work here.
De skal dog vide, at der i denne forsamling er folk, der anser den for en demokratisk institution.
Please be aware, then, that there are some people in this House who regard it as a democratic institution.
Langer (V). - (DE) Hr. formand, tak, fordi De nu giver mig ordet.
Langer (V). - (DE) Mr President, thank you for letting me speak now.
Desværre er det ikke sket lidt tidligere.
It is a pity it did not happen earlier.
De gav nemlig - efter min mening med rette - hr. Fayot ordet, og han redegjorde for, hvad det drejer sig om i forbindelse med fortolkningen af artikel 8 om medlemmers nedlæggelse af mandatet.
For - quite rightly in my view - you called Mr Fayot who explained what the issue is in relation to the interpretation of Article 8 on the resignation of Members.
Denne redegørelse fra formanden for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen skulle imidlertid have været givet før afstemningen, så at folk ved, hvad de stemmer om.
But this statement by the chairman of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure should have been made before the vote, so that people would know what they were voting on.
I den her på ny fremlagte fortolkning, fastsættes der ikke nogen frist.
If, then, the debate raises an issue on which we wish unexpectedly to speak, we, on these benches, are never able to do so.
Det fastsættes ikke, at indsættelsen af et nyt medlem, navnlig når det afgåede medlem hørte hjemme i en lille gruppe, skal behandles rettidigt af Udvalget for Forretningsordenen.
I therefore invite the President to look to all of the sections of the House because, otherwise, some honourable Members are always going to be discriminated against.
Hvis forhandlingen imidlertid drejer sig om et problem, som kræver et hurtigt indlæg, lykkes det aldrig at få ordet fra disse pladser.
In the interpretation that was repeated here, no deadline is set.
Derfor opfordrer jeg formandskabet til at dreje deres stole mod alle dele af salen, ellers vil nogle parlamentsmedlemmer altid blive forskelsbehandlet i forhold til andre.
It is not established that the replacement of a Member, especially if he or she does not belong to a group, must be dealt with promptly by the Committee on the Rules of Procedure.
Derfor anmoder jeg Dem om at bede Udvalget for Forretningsordenen om for fremtiden at undersøge, hvor ledes der skal gås frem efter proceduren i henhold til artikel 126, stk. 5, så at det ikke mere forekommer, at Europa-Parlamentet kaldes sammen til en afstemning, hvor det ikke engang står klart, hvad det egentlig drejer sig om, og hvor der ikke kan fremsættes indlæg hverken for eller imod.
So I ask you to urge the Committee on the Rules of Procedure to check in future how it should proceed under the procedure laid down in Article 127(5), to ensure that our House is never again called on to vote when it is not even clear what the vote is about and there was no chance of speaking for or against it.
Jeg anmoder Dem om at få dette under søgt, så at det ikke gentager sig i fremtiden.
So I ask you to have this matter checked so that it does not happen again.
Formanden. - Vi skal få det undersøgt, hr. Langer.
President. - We will have that checked, Mr Langer.
Herefter vil jeg vende tilbage til spørgsmålet om forretningsordenen, eftersom jeg også er medlem af Udvalget for Forretningsordenen - det drejer sig helt nøjagtigt om retten til at afgive stemmeforklaringer før afstemningen.
Having said that, let me revert to the problem over the Rules of Procedure - given that I am also a member of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities - specifically the right to give an explanation of vote before the vote takes place.
Vi har vedtaget og forkastet en række ændringsforslag uden at vide, hvad de drejer sig om.
We have adopted and rejected a number of amendments without knowing what they related to.
Hvis De, hr. formand, er tilfreds med at føre forsædet over en forsamling, hvor kun fire eller fem ved, hvad de stemmer om, må jeg i øvrigt sige, at jeg personligt føler mig stærkt forbitret.
You, Mr President, may be content to chair a debate in which only four or five know what they are voting on, but I have to say that, for my part, I am profoundly distressed by this.
Fælles beslutningsforslag (')om Europa i flere hastigheder der
Joint motion for a resolution (') on a multispeed Europe
Muscardini (NI). - (IT) Med henvisning til forretningsordenen håber vi, at der lyttes til forretningsordenen, også af formanden!
Muscardini (NI). - (IT) By dint of appealing to the Rules of Procedure, let us hope that we will be heeded by both the Rules of Procedure and the President!
Hvis vi fortsætter med at stemme, før vi har forklaret, hvorledes vi stemmer, hvilken politisk værdi har så overhovedet denne forsamling, hr. formand?
If we continue to vote before we have made an explanation of vote, then what the devil is the political value of this House, Mr President?
Vi stemmer om et emne af vital betydning for Den europæiske politiske Union, og De opfører Dem på en måde, som giver indtryk af, at formanden for denne institution er revnende ligeglad med det, som denne institution bør repræsentere for borgerne.
We are voting on an issue of vital importance for European political union and you are acting in such a way as to give the impression that the President of this Institution could not care less about what the Institution itself should represent for citizens.
Det er udemokratisk, uhøfligt og unødvendigt!
That is anti-democratic, boorish and pointless!
Green (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, med alle de kommentarer, der er kommet vedrørende stemmeforklaringerne, skulle man tro, vi ikke havde haft nogen forhandling overhovedet.
Green (PSE). - Mr President, the comments that have been made about these explanations of vote really seem to imply we have had no discussion.
Men vi har faktisk brugt hele formiddagen
But we have spent
Indstilling ved andenbehandling (A4-0005/94) for Udvalget om Udvikling og Samarbejde om Rådets fælles holdning (C4-0029/94 - 94/0147(SYN)) vedrørende for slag til Rådets forordning om en særlig støtteordning for traditionelle AVS-leverandører af bananer (Ordfører: Castagnede)
Recommendation for second reading (A4-0005/94) on behalf of the Committee on Development and Cooper ation, on the common position of the Council (C4-0029/94 - 94/0147 SYN) on the proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a special system of assistance to traditional ACP suppliers of bananas (rapporteur: Mr Castagnède)
(Den fælles holdning godkendtes)
(The President declared the common position adopted)
(Formanden afbrød taleren) på at drøfte dette emne, og det ser man fuldstændig bort fra.
(The President cut the speaker off) all morning discussing this issue and that is being totally ignored.
Blot (NI). - (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, jeg vil gerne komme med tre bemærkninger.
Blot (NI). - (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I should like to make three points.
Allerførst beklager jeg, at visse kolleger søger at øge antallet af møder i Bruxelles, for det er et tegn på, at Parlamentet underkaster sig Kommissionen, at man mangedobler møderne i den by, hvor Kommissionen har sæde.
Firstly, I regret the fact that some Members are seeking to increase the number of sessions of the European Parliament to be held in Brussels, since increasing the number of sessions to be held in the city in which the Commission is based reflects Parliament's submission to the wishes ofthat institution.
Dell'Alba (ARE). - (IT) Hr. formand, De må meget undskylde, men denne gang forstår jeg virkelig ikke, hverken hvorfor det haster eller er nødvendigt at forplumre vor forretningsorden endnu mere.
Dell'Alba (ARE). - (IT) Mr President, I am sorry but on this occasion I really fail to understand why it is so urgent or indeed necessary to distort further our Rules of Procedure.
Vi har gennemført en normal afstemning, vi har tid nok, og det senest vedtagne beslutningsforslag udgør faktisk emnet for det første arbejdsmøde i vort Parlament.
We have held a proper vote, we are in good time and the last resolution adopted in fact comprises the first working session of this Parliament.
Hvis De mener, at den praksis, som De fra nu af og fremover vil anvende, går ud på systematisk at lade stemmeforklaringerne følge efter den endelige afstemning, så spørger jeg mig selv på dette punkt, om det ikke ville være bedre at stemme pr. brev eller pr. fax.
If you take the view that from now on the practice you will apply will be systematically to call for the explanations of vote after the final vote, then I wonder whether it would not be better to vote by post or fax.
I dette tilfælde kunne og burde vi afgive stemmeforklaringerne før den endelige afstemning.
In this instance, we could and should give the explana tions of vote before the final vote.
Endelig beklager jeg, at det for lidt siden blev bestemt at indkalde Parlamentet til en session på den franske nationaldag, det vil sige en feriedag i den franske Republik.
Secondly, it clearly emerged from the debates on the calendar for the partsessions that there are certain gaps in the Edinburgh agreements in this respect: the agree ments guarantee that twelve plenary sessions will be held in Strasbourg, but they do not specify the length of those sessions.
Det er for øvrigt ikke første gang.
Explanations of vote
Jeg vil sige, at det ikke er særlig høfligt over for mine landsmænd.
It is not the first time that this has happened, moreover, and it is somewhat insulting to the people of France.
Gollnisch (NI). - (FR) Hr. formand, hr. Jean-Marie Le Pen har helt berettiget beskrevet den politiske strategi, der anvendes på problemet med forbindelserne mellem Bruxelles og Strasbourg, som den kinesiske tyv, der hver dag flytter genstanden nogle centimeter på disken hos den, han vil tage noget fra.
Gollnisch (NI). - (FR) Mr President, Jean-Marie Le Pen has rightly described the political methods that are applied to the problem of relations between Brussels and Strasbourg as the technique of the Chinese thief - a technique which consists of moving the object you wish to steal a few inches closer to you every day!
Striby (EDN). - (FR) Hr. formand, de, der ville vise, at det var velbegrundet at udsætte diskussionerne til efter afstemningen, har her et oplagt bevis på deres fejltagelse, da alle går og er fuldstændigt uinteresserede.
Striby (EDN). - (FR) Mr President, this clearly demonstrates to those who sought to justify the postponement of the explanations of vote until after the vote that they were wrong: everyone has completely lost interest and is leaving.
Det er meget præcist det, der har haft afgørende indflydelse på vores forbindelser: Man har først talt om et udvidet Præsidium, udvidet til alle parlamentsmedlem mer, uden at der er sket nogen ændring af forretningsordenen i mellemtiden.
That is precisely what has characterized our relations: firstly, there was talk of an Enlarged Bureau - enlarged to include all Members, without any previous amendment of the Rules of Procedure.
Denne mærkværdige fremgangsmåde, der - fik vi at vide - i begyndelsen blev anvendt udelukkende af protokolmæssige årsager for at modtage udenlandske statsoverhoveder, er derefter blevet fulgt af debatter, og så er debatterne blevet fulgt af afstemning.
The introduction of this unusual formula - which was applied initially, we were told, purely for reasons of protocol, so that foreign Heads of State could be received - was followed by debates, and those debates were followed by votes.
Vi ser i dag, at der er opstået et nyt begreb, nemlig mini-mødeperiode.
Now we are seeing the introduction of another new concept: the mini-session.
Minimødeperioden vil udvide sig til at blive en maxi-mødeperiode, og den vil derefter udvides i antal, indtil der her i Strasbourg kun er en postkasse, hvilket er en overtrædelse af regeringstraktaterne og -aftalerne.
The length of the mini-session will be increased until it becomes a maxi-session; and then the number of mini-sessions will be increased until there is nothing left in Strasbourg except a letter box - in violation of the Treaties and numerous intergovernmental agreements.
Hr. formand, kære kolleger, vi kan ikke godkende den kalender, der er foreslået for mødeperioderne for Europa-Parlamentet i 1995, for denne kalender indeholder afholdelse af yderligere møder i Bruxelles.
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, we cannot approve the proposed calendar for the European Parliament's partsessions in 1995, since that calendar envisages the holding of additional sessions in Brussels.
Dette forslag bidrager på en lumsk og lusket måde til fuldstændigt at fordreje betydningen af de tekster, der fastsætter sædet for vores forsamling til at være i Strasbourg, og til at flytte tyngdepunktet for Europa-Parlamentet til Bruxelles.
The purpose of this proposal is totally to subvert, in the most insidious and underhand way, the meaning of the texts which establish Strasbourg as the seat of the European Parliament, and to shift this Parliament's centre of gravity towards Brussels.
Under alle omstændigheder viser Edinburgh-afgørelsen sig at være dårlig gennemtænkt, vanskelig at iværksætte og dermed meget kostbar.
In the interests of efficiency and economy - which we, as Members of this Parliament, are duty bound to uphold -all sessions, as well as all group and committee meetings, should be held in one place.
Den effektivitet og den økonomiske sans, som vi parlamentsmedlemmer skal være garanter for, ville kræve, at alle møderne og udvalgs- og gruppemøderne blev samlet på ét sted, det kan kun være der, hvor Parlamentet har sæde, nemlig i Strasbourg.
I have no hesitation in saying that such methods are made all the more unacceptable by the fact that a report by our colleague Mr Tomlinson clearly demonstrates the type of financial circumstances in which they have been adopted.
Som nyvalgt er jeg faktisk forbløffet over denne parlamentariske nomadetilværelse, der består i at flytte betydelige og enorme menneskelige og materielle ressourcer til trods for enhver rationalisme og enhver sund fornuft.
As a newly elected Member, I am frankly astonished by this Parliament's nomadic lifestyle, which consists of continually shifting vast amounts of human and material resources, contrary to all common sense and reason.
Wynn (PSE). - (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil blot sige, at Parlamentet i dag har givet Europas skatteydere en ordentlig lussing.
Wynn (PSE). - Mr President, I just wish to say that today this House has given a slap in the face to the taxpayers of Europe.
Der er overhovedet ingen grund til at have to mødeperioder i Strasbourg i oktober.
There is no reason whatsoever to have two Strasbourg partsessions in October.
Tolv møde perioder i Strasbourg vil koste skatteyderne over 100 millioner ecu på et enkelt år.
To hold twelve partsessions in Strasbourg will cost the taxpayer well in excess of ECU 100 million in a single year.
Over 20% af vort budget går til disse mødeperioder, samtidig med at vi i Bruxelles har Europas største byggeprojekt i gang, som vi nu kommer til at bruge 12 dage om året - hele 12 dage !
Over 20% of our budget is going into these partsessions here, yet at the same time in Brussels we have the biggest building project in Europe which will we will now use for 12 days in a year - 12 whole days! This is an absolute scandal!
Dette spild af offentlige midler - for ikke at tale om skandalen med de mange ejendomme i Bruxelles, som vores kollega Jean-Pierre helt berettiget gør opmærksom på - gør et alvorligt indgreb i vores Parlaments troværdighed.
This waste of taxpayers' money - not to mention the scandalous expansionist building project in Brussels, which our colleague Mr Jean-Pierre has rightly condemned - seriously undermines the credibility of this Parliament.
Strasbourg er og skal forblive det eneste sæde for Europa-Parlamentet i overensstemmelse med grundlæggernes tanker.
Strasbourg is, and must remain, the one and only seat of the European Parliament, in accordance with the vision which inspired the European Community's founding fathers.
Jeg beklager meget, at borgmesteren i Strasbourg ikke har fulgt dette forslag. Tro mig, som franskmand...
I am only sorry that the Mayor of Strasbourg has not been following this proposal.
Og det værste er - og det ærgrer mig virkelig - at vi ikke engang har drøftet dette spørgsmål.
To top it all - this is what really annoys me - we have not even debated the issue.
Vi har ikke haft en forhandling om sagen, kun en afstemning.
We have not had a debate on the issue, merely a vote. That is an absolute outrage!
Der findes en mafia herinde - i ordets mildere betydning - der kontrollerer dagsordenen, og de
There is a mafia at work within this place - in the nicest sense of
Wynn almindelige medlemmer får aldrig en chance for at udtale sig om spørgsmål som dette.
Wynn the word - that controls this agenda, and the ordinary Members never seem to get a chance to have their say on matters like this.
Endnu inden man analyserer de foreslåede ændringer, må man ikke glemme, at man for nogle år siden allerede formindskede plenarmøderne med en arbejdsuge.
Killilea (RDE). - Mr President, I and my party, the Fianna Fail Party, have always been very loyal support ers of the idea and the concept that Parliament should sit in Strasbourg.
Og dette vil bestemt ikke blive afhjulpet ved at forlænge dem fra to til tre halve dage.
We still hold that view today.
Killilea (RDE). - (EN) Hr. formand, jeg selv og mit parti, Fianna Fail-partiet, har altid været loyale tilhængere af, at Parlamentet skulle have sæde i Strasbourg.
Before analysing the proposed changes we must not forget that some years ago we already reduced the plenary session by one working week, nor overlook the fact that the so-called mini-sessions are considered a bad joke by nearly everyone.
Men bortset fra det vil jeg gerne sige til Dem, hr. formand, at jeg er en smule skuffet over, at fru Trautmann ikke er til stede, for den sag, jeg gerne vil drøfte med hende, drejer sig om, hvorledes vi, der bor i de yderste områder eller i periferien, kommer til Strasbourg.
But that apart, I wish to say to you, Mr President, that I am a bit disappointed that Mrs Trautmann is not here, because the matter I want to talk to her about is the accessibility of Strasbourg for us, the people who live in the outer parts or in the peripheral regions.
Men tilbage til Strasbourg, Europa-Parlamentets eneste virkelige hjemsted.
But back to Strasbourg, the only real seat of the European Parliament.
Den, som nu tager tid til udvalgsmøder og lignende fra plenarmøderne, kan da ikke andet end skade plenarmødernes funktion.
Anyone who takes time off the sessions for committee meetings and the like is only detracting from the effectiveness of the plenary sittings.
Det er da indlysende.
That is quite obvious.