natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Oprettelsen af en ny myndighed - Europol - risikerer efter vor opfattelse snarere at vanskeliggøre end at lette et effektivt samarbejde.
We believe that establishing a new competence -Europol - is more likely to make effective cooperation more difficult than it is to facilitate it.
Hertil kommer vanskelighederne ved at sikre borgerne indsigt og kontrol - noget, der er uhyre vigtigt, når det gælder samfundets repressive organer.
On top of this there are the difficulties of guaranteeing the public scrutiny and control, an aspect of tremendous importance with regard to repressive bodies in society.
Og på den måde mister demokrati og retsstat på vej til Bruxelles og Haag sin betydning.
In such a way, democracy and the rule of law are losing theh status on the road to Brussels and The Hague.
Langsomt sniger den overbevisning sig ind på mig, at den såkaldt organiserede kriminalitet virkelig er et meget, meget stort problem.
I am becoming increasingly convinced that what is referred to as organized crime really is an extremely serious problem.
Men jeg mener, at de midler og strukturer, der i Europol bliver brugt til bekæmpelse af organiseret kriminalitet, er meget farligere for retsstaten end den organiserede kriminalitet selv.
However, I believe that the structures and resources which are being put in place in Europol to combat organized crime are far more dangerous for the rule of law than organized crime itself.
Naturligvis er vi for et politimæssigt samarbejde i Europa, men Europol er bestemt ikke noget bidrag til en årsagsorienteret kriminalpolitik, men opbygger bureaukratiske politimæssige strukturer.
Of course we are in favour of political cooperation in Europe: however, Europol is not part of a crime policy geared to addressing causes, but wUl encourage bureaucratic police structures.
Og nu skal der altså ratificeres, uden at spørgsmålet om EF-Domstolen er afklaret, uden at den demokratiske kontrol - national eller i EuropaParlamentet - er fastsat, uden at databeskyttelsesstandarden virkelig er sikret, uden at der overhovedet er nogen europæisk påtalemyndighed i sigte.
And now the Convention is to be ratified, without the question of the Court of Justice being settled, without any democratic controls being put in place - either national or by the European Parliament - without the standard of data protection really being guaranteed, and without any prospect at all of having a European public prosecutor.
Vi oplever allerede nu problemer med hensyn til registre ring: registrering af race, seksuel orientering, politisk overbevisning og religiøs tro.
We are aheady seeing problems with registration, the registration of race, sexual orientation, political convictions and reügious faith.
Selvom der, hvad disse problemer angår, er sket en vis opstramning af det italien ske forslag, er de endnu ikke løst.
These are problems which have been alleviated somewhat in the Italian proposal but which nevertheless remain.
Vi står overfor et vel nok klassisk problem, nemlig konflikten mellem borgernes friheder og rettigheder på den ene side og samfundets ønske om at kontrollere på den anden.
Here we have perhaps the classic problem, with people's freedoms and rights conflicting with the deshe of bodies in society to exercise control.
Der er problemer med hensyn til åbenhed og indsigt, sådan som det er kommet til udtryk i Rådets overfølsomhed over for den svenske avis Journalistens ønske om aktindsigt for at kunne informere borgerne om opbygningen af Europol.
There are problems with openness and transparency, as was evident from the Council's over-sensitivity to the wish of the Swedish newspaper Journalisten to have access to documents in order to inform the public about the establishment of Europol.
Det er en overfølsomhed, som vi håber, Parlamentets formandskonference ikke deler; tværtimod håber vi, formandskonferencen vil tage stilling til fordel for indsigt og for avisen Journalisten.
We hope that ParUament's Confer ence of Presidents will not share this over-sensitivity; rather we hope that the Conference of Presidents and ParUament itself wül adopt a position in favour of transparency and of the newspaper Journalisten.
Vi håber at få støtte til vort ændringsforslag 1 ved afstemningen i dag.
We hope today that we wiU receive support for our Amendment No 1 in the vote to come.
Vi ønsker ikke at forhaste os, vi ønsker ikke at tilsidesætte borgernes valgte organer i medlemslandene, og vi ønsker faktisk ikke noget Europol.
We do not want to rush ahead, we do not want to steamroller bodies in the Member States Which have been elected by the people; in fact we do not want Europol.
Vi er ikke rede til at støtte en sådan udvikling.
We are not prepared to support a move in such a direction.
For det er jo det principielle spørgsmål i dag: Ønsker vi at gå ind i en sådan udvikling eller ej?
Because that is the fundamental question here today: in principle, do we want to move in this direction or not?
Vi siger nej.
We are saying no.
Det kan den kendsgerning, at Deres betænkning faktisk på mange punkter er blevet meget bedre, heller ikke ændre.
Nor are we swayed by the fact that your report has actually been much improved in many respects.
Tilblivelsesproceduren - som hr. Schulz sagde - har været dulgt.
The procedure for drawing up the Convention was a clandestine one, as Mr Schulz has pointed out.
Der har ingen kontrol været, og det pres, der udøves - trods den mangelfuldhed, denne konvention lider af nu - for at få den underskrevet, er efter min mening noget helt nyt i retshistorien og et eksempel på afdemokratisering.
There was no supervision, and the pressure to sign this Convention -however full of holes it is at present - is to my mind a novelty in legal terms, and a case of democracy being removed.
Derfor, mine damer og herrer, siger vi nej.
And that is why, ladies and gentlemen, we are saying no.
Det hemmelighedskræmmeri, Europol omgærdes af, har hos mig for længst forvandlet sig til uhygge.
As far as I am concerned, the secrecy surrounding Europol has long since turned into something more sinister.
Dette politi havde strenge pålæg om hemmeligholdelse, pålæg, som det havde givet sig selv, og det skulle også selv bestemme, hvad der skulle holdes hemmeligt for offentlig heden, for pressen, for befolkningen og for parlamenterne.
Imagine that this police force had strict conditions of secrecy which it created for itself and also decided what was kept secret from the public, the press, the people and parliament.
Forestil Dem endvidere, at dette nationale politi havde tilladelse til at samle omfattende data og snuse i alle mulige menneskers levevis, mennesker, der f.eks. var blevet offer for en forbrydelse eller vidne til en forbrydelse.
And imagine that this national police force could collect comprehensive data and seek out the personal details of as many individuals as it wished, who for instance had been victims of or witnesses to a crime.
Ret beset kunne det være enhver af os.
By my simple reckoning, that could be any one of us.
Forestil Dem desuden, at der også fandtes gennemførelsesbestemmelser til arbejdsdatabaser til analyseformål, der ville gøre det muligt at samle og udveksle personoplysninger om racemæssig oprindelse, om politisk overbevisning, om religiøse eller andre anskuelser, om sundhed og om seksuel adfærd.
Moreover, imagine that there were implementing rules on work files for the purpose of analysis which enabled personal data to be collected and' exchanged on racial origin, political persuasion, religious and other beliefs, health and sexual practices.
Hvis jeg fortalte historien om et sådant nationalt politi, ville De enten sige, at hende Roth overdriver skamløst, hun har knald i låget, eller at hun har fundet en ny roman af Orwell.
If I were to tell you the story of such a national police force, you would either say that I was totally exaggerating and completely out of touch with reality, or that I had discovered a new book by George Orwell.
Men hvis jeg havde ret, og dette land med et sådant politi fandtes, mine damer og herrer, så ville vi her forfatte
But there is no police force with structures of this kind, not in any Member State of the European Union.
Nu kommer betænkningen så tilbage uden bemærkelsesværdige ændringer og stadig med de samme tendenser til føderalistiske udskejelser, som har været Europolkonventionens ulykke lige fra starten.
Today, however, the report has come back to us with no significant changes and stiU displaying the same tendency to drift towards federalism which has been the bane of the Europol Convention from the start.
Men Traktaten om Den Europæiske Union er formuleret fuldstændig klart på dette punkt.
Yet the Treaty on European Union was perfectly clear about this.
I henhold til artikel K.1, stk. 9, hvor Europol udtrykkelig nævnes, er dette organ for politimæssigt samarbejde anbragt i et rent regeringssamarbejde, hvilket i sig selv fratager Kommissionen enhver initiativret.
According to Article K.l(9), which refers to Europol by name, this body for police cooperation is placed in a strictly intergovernmental context, excluding even any right of initiative on the part of the Commission.
Hvis man havde holdt sig til dette udmærkede princip, som de forskellige lande endvidere har ratificeret, ville Europol konventionen helt sikkert være underskrevet for flere år siden.
If we had stood by this excellent principle, a principle moreover which has been ratified by the various States, the Europol Convention would certainly have been signed several years ago.
Berthu selvom det har kostet ham at blive skudt i skoene, at han er ekstremt højreorienteret.
Berthu police forces as a rival, with all the negative repercussions that would have.
polemik - soni i øvrigt ikke er slut den dag i dag - og påtog sig således af rent ideologiske grunde ansvaret for at forsinke indgåelsen af en konvention, der ikke desto mindre er nyttig for borgernes sikkerhed.
The Nassauer report, despite the moderation of its language and despite the genuine concern for balance that it often shows, follows this same federalist line.
Nassauer-betænkningen er ganske vist velformuleret og holdt i afdæmpede vendinger og er ofte kendetegnet af et reelt ønske om ligevægt, men tilslutter sig alligevel denne føderalistiske tendens.
And I cannot approve any report which seeks to delay sound international police cooperation, or even to render it ineffective by making it answerable to the European Commission or the European Parliament, since neither of those institutions has any powers in this area.
For det andet er der selvfølgelig den organiserede kriminalitet på internationalt plan. På det plan kan en organisation som Europol gøre et fremragende stykke arbejde.
Any legal dispute between a European citizen and Europol can perfectly well be settled through the national courts.
Vi har fire klagepunkter.
We have four criticisms of this report.
For-det første regner han med, at Europol i anden omgang vil få mulighed for at efterforske på medlemsstatemes område og dermed blive udstyret med overnationale beføjelser.
First, it argues that, in the second stage, Europol should be empowered to conduct inquiries within the territories of the Member States, which would amount to giving it supranational powers.
Vi fra vores side mener, at en sådan udvikling ikke vil føre til nogen som helst fremskridt rent teknisk, men derimod medføre betydelige forfatningsmæssige problemer i mange lande, hvor politiets kompetence betragtes som en vigtig forudsætning for håndhævelsen af landets suverænitet.
For our part, we believe that any such development would add nothing from a technical standpoint and would pose very serious constitutional problems in the many countries where the powers of the police are regarded as one of the essential conditions for the exercise of sover eignty.
Jeg kan således ikke godkende en betænkning, som går ind for udsættelsen af et sundt internationalt politisamarbejde, eller sågar for en afsporing deraf ved at underlægge det instruktioner fra Europa-Kommissionen eller Europa Par la mentet, idet ingen af disse to institutioner har kompetence dertil.
I also think it is silly that Parliament is preventing Europol from operating effectively until such time as its Eurobusybodying demands are met.
En eventuel retstvist mellem en EU-borger og Europol kan perfekt bilægges ved de nationale domstole.
I think it is a very good thing that Europe's citizens are not dependent for their security on MEPs who scream blue murder just because they are asked to show theh identity card at a frontier.
For det andet bryder han traktaten ved at kræve, at Europa-Parlamentet skal høres vedrørende en lang række detailpunkter i forbindelse med Europols funktion, hvilket forekommer teknisk uigennemførligt, samtidig med at der i artikel K.6, 2. afsnit, udelukkende tales om en høring vedrørende de vigtigste aspekter af et område, som jo fortsat henhører under regeringssamarbejdet.
Secondly, the report violates the Treaty by calling for the European Parliament to be consulted on a multitude of detailed points relating to the functioning of Europol, which seems technically impossible to achieve and disregards the fact that Article K.6(2) requhes consultation only on the principal aspects of a matter which, I repeat, is still an intergovernmental one.
Følgelig anser jeg det for at være tåbeligt, at Europa-Parlamentet faktisk ønsker at udsætte Europols påbegyndelse af sit arbejde, indtil alle dets euroindblandingssyge krav er opfyldt. Det er i øvrigt udmærket, at de europæiske borgeres sikkerhed ikke er afhængig af parlamentsmedlem mer, der for eksempel allerede himler op, når de ved en grænse en gang i mellem skal vise legitimation.
In the exceptionally interesting explanatory statement to his report Mr Nassauer further says that systematic corruption in the award of public-sector contracts shows that organized crime is seeking to create its own space where the power of the State, based on the rule of law and democratic legitimacy, cannot reach.
Stadig i den særdeles interessante begrundelse til sin betænkning fremsætter hr. Nassauer den påstand, at den systematiske korruption i forbindelse med tildeling af offentlige kontrakter og licenser tyder på, at den organiserede kriminalitet forsøger at skaffe sig en plads ved siden af eller oven over den demokratisk legitimerede statsmagt.
Finally the report becomes really provocative by calling for the European Court of Justice to have preliminary jurisdiction, which would be tantamount to rampant communitization and, for some governments, would be sufficient reason for not ratifying the Europol Convention.
Det er fordi vi virkelig ønsker en ratificering af konventionen, at vi afviser Nassauerbetænkningen.
It is because we really do want to see the convention ratified that we will be voting against the Nassauer report.
Det er ikke ret meget bedre på fælles skabsplan. Tillad mig at minde om selve Den Europæiske Revisionsrets beretning, som viser at der, eufemistisk omskrevet, foreligger den største uklarhed med hensyn til anvendelsen af knap en fjerdedel af EU's budget.
Bontempi (PSE). - (TF) Mr President, I should like to emphasize how the creation of a European police force -even only as a Uaison office, certainly not a European FBI - represents a symbolic act of great importance from the point of view of transfer of sovereignty.
Så lad være med at bede mig om, og jeg afslutter hermed, at betro de samme politikere og institutioner kontrollen med Euro pol.
It is certainly as significant as the creation of a single currency, but after that it is one of the most symbolic acts.
Offentlige transportmidler som under grundsbaner er ved nattetide praktisk taget prisgivet unge voldsmænd.
At night public transport, such as underground trains, is virtuaUy surrendered to young thugs.
I mange borgeres bevidsthed opfylder staten kun utilstrækkeligt en af sine fundamentale opgaver, nem lig at sikre beskyttelse mod forbrydelser og vold.«
Many people have the perception that the State no longer adequately fulfils one of its fundamental duties, that of providing protection against crime and violence'.
Desværre kan jeg ikke tiltræde resten af den betænkning, der bærer hans navn.
Regret tably, however, I cannot endorse the rest of his report.
Oprettelsen af denne instans har givet ikke samme betydning som en fælles mønt, men er en af de vigtigste symbolske handlinger næst efter denne.
For anyone who is interested, the Brussels commune of Schaarbeek, just a few minutes away from the European Parliament buildings, has recently acquhed a dedicated poUce commissioner of this kind.
For det første er det sådan, at der slet ikke er brug for Den Europæiske Union, når det gælder bekæmpelse af gadekriminalitet.
I am most concerned to note that there has not been a debate in any way commensurate with this move in any Member State - certainly not in mine.
Dertil er det for det meste tilstrækkeligt med én ansvarsbevidst politimester, som kan træffe en beslutning om, at nådesløse politiaktioner ikke først og fremmest bør være rettet imod parkeringssyndere eller imod gode bor gere, der stiller deres skraldespand på gaden en time for tidligt, men derimod imod narkohandlere, voldtægtsforbrydere, tyve og overfaldsmænd uanset nationalitet og her komst.
My personal concern is bound up with the warning we have "all sounded and which it is as well to stress so that the establishment and operations of Europol may be accompanied by the essen tial, inalienable democratic guarantees: judicial guarantees through the Court of Justice; political guarantees through relations with the European Parliament and the national parliaments; social guarantees through information for citizens.
Til dem, det måtte interessere, kan jeg oplyse, at der i en af Bruxelles' omegnskommuner Schaarbeek få minut ters gang fra Europa-Parlamentets bygninger for nylig er kommet en sådan ansvarsbevidst politimester, som ene mand beviser, at kampen mod kriminaliteten kan vindes -
In that sense, whilst I share nearly aU the concerns expressed in this House by Mrs Claudia Roth, I do not agree with the conclusions, which frankly seem to me apocalyptic, such as not taking account of the fact that we are moving in a field bristling with difficulties: it is a question, in fact, of having to respond appropriately and effectively on the one hand to the citizens' needs for security, which are also needs for freedom, and on the other hand of course to the need to ensure that the basic and typical rights of our systems are fully respected.
Jeg bemærker med meget stor bekymring, at der ikke i nogen medlemsstat - i hvert fald ikke i min - er foregået en debat, der i ringeste måde har svaret til betydningen af denne overgang.
At this stage I would consider all possibilities for amend ment and personally I shall vote - we shaU vote - for the amendments proposed in this matter, as we have already done in the past. However, whilst recognizing the splendid
Selvom jeg deler næsten alle de bekymringer, der er givet udtryk for her i salen af fru Roth, er jeg dog ikke enig i
An organization like Europol can be brilliantly effective here.
Bontempi både er synlig og usynlig - og derfor måske også mere bekymrende.
Bontempi eignty in certainly limited albeit decisive fields.
Samarbejdet mellem nationer, hvor betydningsfuldt det end måtte være, løser ikke noget«.
Cooperation between nations, important as it is, solves nothing.
Det er ikke et citat, der direkte vedrører Europol, det drejer sig heller ikke om et nyligt citat om den europæiske opbygning. Det er hentet fra et brev, som Monnet skrev til McMillan i sommeren 1950.
Those words do not refer directly to Europol nor were they even, in terms of the building of Europe, of recent origin: they are taken from a letter which Monnet sent to McMillan in the summer of 1950.
Det ville være trist, ærede medlemmer, hvis vi stadig i dag skulle være lammet af den samme angst og frygt.
It would be sad, ladies and gentlemen, if we were still at this time paralysed by the same fears and mistrust.
På dette stadium vil jeg meget geme høre ethvert forslag til mulige ændringer, og faktisk vil jeg personlig og vi i gruppen stemme for de ændringsforslag, der er fremsat herom, således som vi tidligere har gjort. Selvom jeg anerkender det fine stykke arbejde, der er udført af ordføreren, hr. Nassauer, vil jeg - og dette er det fundamentale punkt - foreslå to positive ting.
IN THE CHAIR: MRS SCHLEICHER Vice-President work done by the rapporteur, Mr Nassauer, I shall propose - and this is the basic point - two positive things: the first is to ask for the unblocking by the Council of that chapter in the budget relating to the thhd pillar for information for the citizens on a' question such as Europol.
Det er af væsentlig betydning, at borgerne, de erhvervsdrivende og domstolene bliver oplyst, dvs. at der er en vilje til at give og modtage oplysninger.
It is essential to have information available for the citizens, businessmen, judges, to have informed public opinion and awareness.
Det andet forslag er, at der skal skabes en meget nær forbindelse med kommissioner i medlemsstaterne - om indre anliggender, retlige anliggender og bekæmpelse af mafiaen - hvor disse findes.
The other proposal is that there should be a very close Unk with the Members States' committees - where they exist -on home affahs, justice and prevention of organized crime.
Vi må, så længe vi foreslår ændringer, som endnu ikke er sket, så længe vi kræver indførelse af politiske garantier, domstolsbeskyttelse og oplysning, også virke for at skabe dette forhold.
But whilst we are proposing amendments, which we have not yet got, whilst we are asking for political and judicial guarantees to be introduced and for information, we must also be working to create those conditions.
Dette er -efter min opfattelse - en moden holdning, der varetager demokratiet og garantierne, men tillige tilsigter at gøre et uundværligt redskab i kampen mod den internationale kriminalitet effektivt.
That is, to my mind, a mature approach, concerned about democracy, about guarantees, but also concerned to make effective an indispensable instrument for the fight against international crime.
Crowley (UPE). - (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne sammen med de øvrige medlemmer ønske hr. Nassauer tillykke med hans betænkning og give udtryk for, hvor vigtigt det er at behandle dette spørgsmål ved denne skillevej i Europas udvikling.
Crowley (UPE). - Madam President, I, along with the other Members, would like to congratulate Mr Nassauer on his report and say how important it is that we are facing this issue at this juncture in the development of Europe.
Vi står over for en grundlæggende ændring i Europas holdning og i Unionens stilling som juridisk person.
We are looking at a fundamental change within the attitude of Europe and also within the legal standing of the European Union as a personality.
Denne stilling og udvikling undergraves imidlertid af meget hemmelighedsfulde og velorganiserede grupper af personer, der indgår i et internationalt, kriminelt samarbejde uden grænser.
However, that standing and that development are being undermined by very secretive and highly organized groups of people who work on a transnational, without-frontiers basis in crime.
Palacio Vallelersundi (PPE). - (ES) Hr. formand, at gøre fremskridt gennem konkrete handlinger på de områder, hvor der er tale om fælles interesser og ægte solidaritet, har indtil i dag været den fremherskende metode i den euro pæiske opbygning.
Palacio Vallelersundi (PPE). - (ES) Mr President, progress by specific measures in those fields where we have common interests, solidarity in practice, has so far been the principal method in the building of Europe.
Men på trods af, at det ofte er blevet gjort gældende i de officielle dokumenter, lader det til, at mange af dem, der har ansvaret for at gå videre med europæernes fælles foretagende, har glemt at gøre det.
It seems that, although it is frequently mentioned in official documents, many of those who have the responsibility for furthering the European peoples' joint venture have forgotten it.