natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Fischler, medlem af Kommissionen. - (DE) Fru formand, mine damer og herrer, jeg tror, at vi alle i denne sal og også uden for den er klar over den vanskelige situation, som oksekødssektoren for øjeblikket er inde i.
Fischler, Member of the Commission. - (DE) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, I believe that all of us, in this House and elsewhere, are fully familiar with the difficult situation cunently prevailing in the beef and veal sector.
Siden BSE-krisens start i år er forbruget i nogle medlemsstater faldet 20-30 %, og det samme er priserne, som i to medlemsstater for øjeblikket ligger på omkring 63 % af interventionsprisen, dvs. meget tæt på sikkerhedsnettet.
Since the start of the BSE crisis this year, consumption has fallen by 20 to 30 % in some Member States, and prices have followed suit. In two Member States, prices now stand at 63 % of the intervention price, in other words very close to the safety net.
Desværre er der næppe tegn på, at dette skulle blive bedre i den nærmeste fremtid.
Unfortunately, there are few indications of any improve ment in this situation in the immediate future.
Alle vil fortsat tale om BSE, og ergo vil forbruget ikke inden for en overskuelig fremtid kunne bringes op på det gamle niveau igen.
BSE is going to remain in the public eye, so that consumption will not return to its former levels in the foreseeable future.
Under disse omstændigheder har alle de ret, som siger, at vi har hårdt brag for foranstaltninger.
At this particular time of year, the autumn, substantial numbers of beef cattle are going to come onto the market, and the
Hr. Funk, vore forslag indeholder som supplement dertil tillige et program for tidlig slagtning af mælkekalve.
In addition to this, Mr Funk, our proposals do indeed include an early slaughter programme for suckling calves.
Et andet alternativ, jeg har fundet i Deres ændringsforslag, nemlig at reducere kvoten for ammekøer i stedet for at slagte kalve, er set ud fra mit synspunkt ikke noget realistisk alternativ.
Another alternative which I noted in your proposed amend ments was to reduce the suckler cow premium instead of slaughtering calves, but in my view this is not a feasible alternative.
Derigennem ville vi nemlig foranledige landmændene til at slagte deres ammekøer nu.
Its effect, after all, would be to prompt the farmers to slaughter their suckler cows now.
Og det er der en række grande til ikke at gøre nu.
And there are many, reasons why, at this moment in time, that is not a good idea.
Fór det første ville denne slagtning af ekstra køer lige nu ikke reducere udbuddet af oksekød, men tværtimod øge det, for det andet ville en reduktion af retten til ammekopræmier og af antallet af ammekøer foregribe spørgsmål fra den kom mende markedsordning for oksekød.
First, this slaughtering of additional cows at the present time would not reduce the supply of beef but would actually further increase it; secondly, the reduction of suckler cow premium entitlements and the number of suckler cows would prejudge questions relating to the future arrangements for beef and veal.
Efter min mening bør vi hellere bedømme dette spørgsmål i en langsigtet kontekst.
I believe, then, that we would do better to judge this question in the longterm context.
Vi ved imidlertid, at for øjeblikket udnyttes en million af disse rettigheder ikke, dvs. at vi ville blive nødt til at opkøbe en million rettigheder, uden at det ville få nogen virkning overhovedet.
Thirdly, a substantial cut - and we must always bear in mind that in the case of suckler cows, unlike male animals, we are dealing with individually assigned rights -would probably mean that we would finish up by having to
Fischler søgelser til den multifaglige komité og til den videnskabelige veterinærkomité, dvs. både den undersøgelse, der vedrører den mulige overførsel af BSE fra ko til kalv, og den undersøgelse, som i mellemtiden stadig oftere går under navnet Oxford- undersøgelsen.
Secondly, the Commission, at its latest meeting, merely took formal note of a report by me on the latest Council meeting. I informed the Commission that I had told the Council exactly the same thing - that we would stand by Florence, and that furthermore I had aheady done, more than a week earlier, what I always do when we receive a new study - I passed on both studies to the multidisciplinary committee and the scientific veterinary committee, in other words both the study relating to the possibility of transmission of BSE from cows to calves, and the socalled Oxford Study about which we have heard more and more since then.
Men jeg takker Dem for støtten til mit forslag om at medtage unge handyr i interventionen og for de tilskyndelser, De fremkommer med, hvad angår alder og vægt i den sammenhæng. Efter min mening lønner det sig at se på dette alternativ.
However, I am grateful for your support for my proposal that young male animals should be included in the inter vention, and for your suggestions regarding age and weight in this connection.
Jeg vil under alle omstændigheder lade mine eksperter undersøge sagen.
In any case, I am cunently having this question looked at by my experts.
Sideløbende med programmet til slagtning af kalve og til intervention i forbindelse med unge dyr foreslår jeg også en reduktion af de nationale kontingenter for ydelse àf den særlige præmie.
Alongside the calf slaughter programme and the intervention for young animals, I have also proposed reducing the national quotas for the granting of the special premium.
Det burde efter min mening kunne accepteres af alle medlemsstater, da der som følge af program met til slagtning af kalve i den kommende tid vü btive brag for færre præmier og vi har valgt det hidtil højeste niveau for anmeldelse af præmier som udgangsposition for vort forslag.
As I see it, this should actually be acceptable to every Member State, because fewer premiums are going to be claimed in the near future as a result of the calf slaughter programme and because we selected the highest level of premium applications to date as the starting point for our proposal.
Der kunne ikke træffes afgørelser om nogen.form for ændringer eller lignende, fordi ingen i Kommissionen anmodede derom.
No decisions could be taken regarding any modifications, or anything of that kind, because no one in the Commission asked for any.
Dermed er, mener jeg, sagen klar.
That, I believe, makes the position clear.
Konklusionerne fra Firenze lyder: For det første skal forudsætningerne være opfyldt og dertil hører et sådant program for ekstra slagtninger.
The Florence conclusions are as follows: first, the preliminary conditions must be satisfied, one of which is an additional cull programme.
For det andet er der, når forudsætningerne er opfyldt, fastsat en trinvis fremgangsmåde i forbindelse med ophævelsen af eksportforbuddet, og ifølge denne fremgangsmåde skal den britiske regering først forelægge Kommissionen et arbejdsdokument.
Secondly, once the preliminary conditions are satisfied, the intention is to proceed stage by stage with the lifting of the export ban, the procedure first requiring the British government to submit a working document to the Commission.
Kom missionen videresender dette arbejdsdokument tU de to videnskabelige komiteer.
The Commission will then pass this working document on to the two scientific committees.
Når der foreligger en positiv indstiUing fra disse komiteer, indledes den normale beslutningsprocedure, der er fastsat i dette tilfælde.
If a positive recommendation is obtained from those commit tees, the normal decision procedure provided for in this case will be instituted.
Hver enkelt medlemsstat begynder på basis af de for 1995 registrerede ansøgninger om præmier og skal klare én reduktion på 5 %.
Each Member State starts on the basis of the applications recorded for 1995, and is required to accept a 5% reduction.
Men der tages kun hensyn til halvdelen af det antal ansøgninger, der ligger ud over det antal ansøgninger, der var aftalt i 1992.
However, in this calculation, only half of the increase in applications over the number agreed in 1992 is taken into account.
Jeg ved, at denne foranstaltning kritiseres heftigt navnlig i de medlemsstater, som hidtil hovedsagelig eller, for en stor dels vedkommende i stedet for tyrepræmierne gjorde brag af markpræmierne for arealer med majs til ensilering som kompensation. tion.
I am aware that this measure is the subject of strong criticism, especially in those Member States which, in the past, to a large or very large extent, have claimed the arable premiums for silo corn land as compensation instead of the bullock premium.
Jeg ved, at min pakke med forslag til at afhjælpe problemerne på oksekødsmarkedet diskuteres kontroversielt.
I know that my package of proposals designed to remedy the problems in the beef market is the subject of controversy.
På den anden side turde det være klart for enhver praktiker, at det i en krise af et sådant omfang simpelt hen er logisk, at modsatrettede interesser fører til en kontroversiel drøftelse.
On the other hand, I imagine it is clear to every professional in the field that, in a crisis on this scale, it is a matter of simple logic that conflicting interests will necessarily result in a heated debate.
Udgangspositionen i de forskellige medlemsstater er nu en gang alt for forskeUig.
In addition, in this instance, the initial positions as between the various Member States could not be more different.
Men for alle gælder, tror jeg, én ting, nemlig at hurtig hjælp er den mest effektive hjælp.
But one thing, I believe, is true for all of them - help given quickly is always the most effective kind.
Jeg anmoder Dem derfor om så hurtigt som muligt at afgive Deres udtalelse om den samlede pakke.
I therefore ask you to give your opinion on the complete package as soon as possible.
Jeg mener imidlertid, at man ved hjælp af en klausul om revision efter en vis løbetid kunne tage rimeligt hensyn til dette problem.
However, I believe that a review clause would make it possible to take due account of this problem after a certain period.
For at øge foranstaltningerne med henblik ^ på en reduktion af produktionen foreslår jeg endelig, at belægningsgraden reduceres noget i forbindelse med ydelse af ekstensiveringspræmien.
Finally, in order to strengthen the measures for reducing production, I propose that the stock density for the granting of the extensification premium should be reduced somewhat.
Men til gengæld skal for de landmænds vedkommende, som er vilUge til at klare sig med en belægningsgrad på under 1 storkreatur pr. ha, ekstensiveringspræmien øges i forhold hertil.
To balance this, however, the extensification premium should be raised accordingly for those farmers who are prepared to manage with a stocking density below one large animal unit per hectare.
Green (PSE). - (EN) Fra formand, i lyset af, at jeg bad om en redegørelse tidligere om nyhederne fra den britiske regering, har jeg et spørgsmål tU hr. kommissær Fischler.
Green (PSE). - Madam President, in view of the fact that I asked for the statement earlier on the latest news from the British Government, I have a question for Commissioner Fischler.
Hans forslag, som hr. Funks betænkning er baseret på, er igen baseret på oplysninger om, at der i Det Forenede Kongerige vil blive slagtet yderligere 147.000 stk. kvæg, hvilket, så vidt vi forstår, nu er blevet udskudt.
His proposals, on which Mr Funk's report is based, are posited on the information that there would be an additional cull in the United Kingdom of 147, 000 cattle which, we understand, has now been suspended.
Hvis det er tilfældet, hvad kommer det så til at betyde for de forslag, der er blevet drøftet her til formiddag i hr. Funks betænkning? ning?
If that is the case, what are the implications for the proposals which have been discussed here this morning in Mr Funk's report?
Vi bliver nødt til at øge interventionsmængderne i den nærmeste fremtid.
As regards the immediate future, we are going to have to raise the intervention stocks.
Der er ingen vej udenom.
There is no way round it.
Men jeg er enig med dem, der siger, at interventionen skal være så kortvarig som mulig.
I do agree, however, with those who say that intervention must be as brief as possible.
Den er og bliver en kortsigtet foranstaltning.
It is and will remain a shortterm measure.
Derfor gælder den foreslåede forøgelse kun, indtil de øvrige foranstaltninger begynder at virke.
So the proposed increase will remain in force only until the other measures take effect.
Jeg spørger imidlertid: Er det fastsatte tidsrum på 14 måneder - og kun i dette tidsrum øges mængderne - for langt?
I do wonder, though, whether the proposed period of 14 months - and stocks are to be increased only during that period - is too long a period.
Eller er det ikke alligevel et meget ærgerrigt mål i løbet af et år 'at ville vende tilbage til de normale produktionsniveauer igen?
When you also call for a reduction in the intervention weights, that has my full support in principle, though I believe we will realistically have to implement it in stages rather than all at once.
Fischler, medlem af Kommissionen. - (DE) Fra formand, fra Green, jeg vil gerne helt klart sige, at konklusionerne •fra Firenze går på, at der opstiUes forudsætninger, som skal være opfyldt, for at den trinvise ophævelse af eksportforbuddet for Storbritannien kan iværksættes.
Fischler, Member of the Commission. - (DE) Madam President, Mrs Green, I should like to make it quite clear that the Florence conclusions relate to preliminary conditions which have to be satisfied before the gradual lifting of the export ban on the United Kingdom can be initiated.
Den pakke, der drøftes i dag, er ikke et resultat af konklusionerne fra Firenze, men tjener til overvindelse af oksekødskrisen ud over den pakke, der ligeledes blev opnået enighed om i Firenze.
The package which is under discussion today is not a result of the Florence conclusions but is designed to overcome the beef crisis, over and above that package on which agree ment was also reached in Florence.
Den gang henstillede man, at der blev afsat 850 mio ecu til direkte indtægtsstøtte til landmændene.
At that time, it was recommended that ECU 850 million should be allocated as direct income support for farmers.
Når De derudover forlanger en tilbageføring af interventionsvægtene, støtter jeg det principielt helt og fuldt.
I have also been asked to comment briefly on what the Commission allegedly decided on Wednesday, and what the British government decided yesterday.
Jeg tror imidlertid, at vi for at være realistiske bliver nødt til at gøre det trinvis og ikke på én gang.
I am bound to say that all I know about this is the British government's press release.
Jeg synes, man bør holde disse to ting adskilt.
Let me make two things completely clear.
Mårtens (PPE). - (NL) Hr. kommissær, spørgsmålet er relativt simpelt, og jeg håber, at også svaret er det. Er de beslutninger, regeringen i London har taget i går, i over ensstemmelse med Kommissionens beslutninger?
That was recommended in Florence, but the measures at issue today concern all fifteen Member States, and in fact have no dhect connection with the question of future steps
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
Fischler to lift the export ban.
Fischler dende efter faktisk at have foreslået os en forøgelse af midlerne.
Are we the same Parliament that wants to contain agricultural spending in the 1997 budget?
britisk problem.
That, if you like, is a British problem.
Hvis forudsætningerne fra Firenze ticke opfyldes, kommer der ikke nogen ophævelse af eksportforbuddet. buddet.
But if the preliminary conditions agreed in Florence are not satisfied, then the export ban will not be lifted.
Stå fast, hr. kommissær, fordi jeg ikke finder, at Schweiz skal danne skole for Europa.
Oh yes, Commissioner, because it does not seem to me to be acceptable that Switzerland should be setting the example for Europe.
Giv os det minimum af forudsætninger, der er nødvendige for at række Dem en hånd. De skal vide, at vor gruppe er med Dem.
Give us the bare minimum of conditions necessary to lend you a hand, and rest assured that our group is with you.
Det spørgsmål, den britiske regering bliver nødt til at stille sig selv, er, hvad den vil opnå.
The question which the British government has to address is what it is trying to achieve.
Så længe forudsætningerne ikke er opfyldt, og så længe vi ikke har et arbejdsdokumenti hånden, vi kan gennemgå, kan der logisk nok ikke være tale om at ophæve eksportforbuddet.
Until such time as it satisfies the preliminary conditions, and until such time as we receive a working document which we can examine, there cannot logically be any talk of lifting the export ban.
Det har ikke noget med det spørgsmål at gøre, at vi f.eks. har brag for nye bestemmelser om de interventionsforanstaltninger, i forbindelse med hvilke vi i næste måned overskrider grænsen på 400 000 t. Ellers bryder oksekødsmarkedet sammen i hele Europa.
This has nothing to do with the question of whether we need, for example, a new regulation on intervention, where the 400, 000 tonne limit will be exceeded in the course of the coming month. Otherwise the beef and veal market will collapse throughout Europe.
Det er mit syn på de ting.
That is the way I see it.
Fantuzzi (PSE). - (IT) Fru formand, som talsmand for landbruget i den største politiske gruppe i Parlamentet må jeg bekende, at jeg er ude af stand til at stemme oprigtigt og velovervejet om ændringsforslagene.
Fantuzzi (PSE). - (IT) Madam President, as the spokesman on agriculture for the largest political group in the House, I have to confess that I am unable to vote seriously and rationally on the amendments.
Jeg ved ikke, hr. Funk, hvem af os der skal være mest bekymret, De eller jeg.
I do not know, Mr Funk, who should be most concerned, you or I.
Kære kolleger, De skal nemlig vide, at vi i dag ikke iværksætter en kun kortvarig foranstaltning for oksekød for at undgå det såkaldte sikkerhedsnet. Her sker en gennem gribende reform af forordningen om den fælles markeds ordning for oksekød i Europa.
Ladies and gentlemen, you should in fact be aware that what we are doing today is not just opening the way for shortterm intervention for beef and veal, to avoid the socalled safety net; what we are seeing here is a faneaching reform of the regulation on the COM in beef and veal in Europe.
En spøg til 1, 4 mia ECU blot i 1997, der på foruroügende vis indleder sæsonen for den fælles landbrugspoütik.
No great shakes at only ECU 1.4 m in 1997 but, worryingly, opening the door to reform of the CAP.
Hr. kommissær, hvad er der blevet af de gode hensigter om at inddrage Europa-Parlamentet aUerede fra starten af de grundlæggende land brugsreformer?
What, Commissioner, happened to those good intentions of in volving Parliament from the outset in fundamental agricultural reforms?
Arias Cañete (PPE). - (ES) Fru formand, vores gruppe vil først og fremmest geme takke hr. Funk for hans strålende betænkning, som er udarbejdet på rekordtid, og hvis indhold vi går helt ind for.
Arias Cañete (PPE). - (ES) Madam President, our Group would firstly like to congratulate Mr Funk on his excellent report, which he produced in record time. We fully support its contents.
Men derudover vU vores gruppe geme vise sin utilfredshed med den strategi, Kommissionen har fulgt i denne sag.
However, in addition, our Group would like to express its disagreement with the Commission's strategy on this subject.
Det er uacceptabelt, at man for at løse en alvorlig krise i oksekødssektoren præsenterer os for en pakke af forslag, hvor man samtidig ændrer forordninger, der støtter producenter af markafgrøder og vedrører forbedringen af landbrugsstrukturernes effektivitet, hvor ved man budgetmæssigt kæder de tre sektorer sammen og kræver finansielle ofre i nogle sektorer for at hjælpe andre.
It is unacceptable that, in dealing with a major crisis in the beef and veal sector, we should be presented with a package of proposals in which, simultaneously, there is amendment of the rules concerning support for producers of herbaceous crops and relating to improvements in efficacy of agrarian structures, linking the three sectors in budgetary terms and requiring financial sacrifice in some in order to support others.
Denne teknik er efter vores gruppes mening forkastelig, fordi den blander uopsættelige aktioner sammen med reformer, der kræver nøje overvejelse.
In the opinion of our Group, this technique is to be condemned because it involves the combination of urgent actions with reforms requiring lengthy consideration.
På denne måde forsøger man at tvinge Parlamentet til at anerkende det uacceptable med en trussel om at afvise det nødvendige.
It involves an attempt to force the will of this House, obliging it to accept the unacceptable on pain of rejecting the necessary.
Men det står også klart, at reformen indeholder nødvendige elementer, som berettiger holdningen i vores gruppe: At acceptere det presserende behov i en sektor, der har brag for løsninger, og afvise det i de øvrige sektorer, eftersom der budgetmæssigt er en margen til at iværksætte de mest presserende reformer, og det budgetmæssigt er muligt med lidt fantasi at dække de forslag, Parlamentet kommer med.
But it is also obvious that there were necessary elements in this reform which justified our Group's position: accepting urgency in the case of one sector requiring solutions and rejecting it in others because, in budgetary terms, there is a margin which makes it possible to deal with the more urgent reforms and, in budgetary terms, it is possible, with a degree of imagination, to cover this House's proposals.
Jeg troede, at den strategi med forelæggelse af dokumenter til overvejelse, der indledtes vin- og fragt og grøntsagssektoren, var kommet for at blive. I mange måneder drøftede vi disse områder.
1 had thought that the strategy of reflection documents, that began with wine and fruit and vegetables, was a permanent decision.
Hvad angår oksekødet - et område, der ikke er mindre indviklet - får vi dokumenterne den 5. september, og i dag, en fredag, hvor hundrede medlemmer er til stede, skal vi lave reformen.
In the case of beef and veal - no less complex an issue - we got the documents on 5 September and today, 20 September, there are about a hundred of us here, on a Friday, to carry out the reform.
Det synes som at drømme med åbne øjne, særlig efter beslutningerne i nat, der efter min mening, hr. kommissær, objektivt rokker ved selve dette forslag på grund af de indvirkninger, de vil få på markedet.
It is a like a daydream, particularly in the wake of last night's decisions which, in my view, Com missioner, objectively speaking, will again call this proposal into question because of the repercussions on the market.
Endelig er Kommissionens kriterium for at ændre de regionale lofter for præmier for kalve tvivlsomt, idet landene har meget forskeUige dækningsindekser med hen syn til de reelle slagtninger, som i nogle tilfælde er en overtrædelse af aftalerne i prispakken.
We fully support Mr Funk's proposals. However, there are delegations within our Group who do not understand the reason for the opposition to the Commission's proposal regarding the conditions for a reduction in intensive methods and improving premiums when the density factor is diminishing because, in the context of a crisis in the sector caused by disease, like the one we are currently experiencing, it is difficult for some national delegations to under stand opposition to such a reduction and the natural feeding of livestock.
Dette burde Rådet have gjort efter vor afstemning for ca. 14 dage side, hvor vi klart sagde nej til at vedtage uopsættelighed vedrørende hele spørgsmålet. Hvorfor forelægger man os nu igen hele pakken, som om intet var hændt, og hvorfor vælger man ikke i stedet at følge den eneste fornuftige vej?
Lastly, the Commission has based its modification of the regional ceilings of premiums for calves on a dubious criterion, having very different degrees of coverage for countries with regard to actual culls which, in some cases, involve prejudicing the agreements acquired in the price package.