natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hr. Mallet, som er formand for Udvalget om Eksterne Økonomiske Forbindelser, var også til stede, og denne be tydningsfulde udvikling i Fællesskabet relationer til Østeuropa bor opfølges af en oprettelse af diplomatiske forbindelser med nogle af COMECONs medlems stater og vil give vore delegationer mulighed for at begynde formelt.
Mr Mallet, the chairman of the Committee on External Economic Relations, was also present and this significant development in Community relations with Eastern Europe should be followed by the establishment of diplomatic relations with some of the member countries of Comecon and will permit the work of our delegations to begin for mally.
Jeg mener også, at dette betyder et større gennembrud for oprettelsen af gode forbindelser mellem os selv og COMECON-landene.
I equally believe that this is a fairly major break through in building good relations between ourselves and the Comecon countries.
Colino Salamanca (S), formand for Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Ernæring. — (ES) Hr. formand. Landbrugsudvalget udtrykker ønske om, at Le Rouxbetænkningen bibeholdes på dagsordenen, især, som hr. Prout sagde, fordi punkterne i beslutningen i den første Le Roux-betænkning, som henviste til de spørgsmål, som var under behandling ved Domstolen, var blevet udeladt eller ændret for netop at tage hensyn til de tanker, som Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder havde givet udtryk for.
COLINO SALAMANCA (S), Chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. — (ES) Mr President, the Committee on Agriculture would like Mrs Le Roux's report to remain on the agenda, the more especially because, as Mr Prout stated, those paragraphs of the resolution in Mrs Le Roux's first report referring to matters under consideration by the Court of Justice have now been either deleted or amended specifically to take account of the views of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights.
Vi mener derfor ikke, at der er nogen grund til at gå imod, at den behandles og eventuelt vedtages af plenarforsamlingen.
We do not therefore think that there are any grounds in this connection for objecting to the report's being discussed in plenary session and approved as necessary. sary.
Jeg vil nu lade Parlamentet træffe afgørelsen.
Shall we put it to the vote?
Mäher (LDR). — (EN) Hr. formand, til Forretningsordenen : Da De kom ind på alle disse resultater, blev jeg overrasket over, at De gik så let henover, at man i Landbrugsministerrådet efter en hel del besvær og arbejde rent faktisk er nået frem til en afgørelse.
MAHER (LDR). — Mr President, on a point of order. I am suprised that when you were speaking about all these achievements you passed so lightly over the fact that the Agriculture Council, after a great deal of trouble and work, in the end virtually came to a decision.
Men denne afgørelse om landbrugspriserne kan ikke gen nemføres.
But that decision on farm prices cannot be implemented.
Dette betyder en alvorlig situation for Fællesskabet.
That is a serious situation for the Community.
Det lader til, at en enkelt regering ikke kan tilslutte sig afgørelsen, og Kommissionen bliver nu nødt til at skride til handling og anvende priserne fra sidste år.
One government apparently cannot see its way to agree and the Commission is now being forced to take action to apply the prices of last year.
Dette er en meget alvorlig situation for landbrugerne og bidrager så absolut ikke til tillid til Fællesskabet eller til dets beslutningsproces.
That is a very serious situation for farmers and certainly does nothing to inspire confidence in the Community or in its decisionmaking process.
Provan (ED). — (EN) Til Forretningsordenen, hr. for mand, Jeg mener ikke, at dette kræver en afstemning.
PROVAN (ED). — On a point of order, Mr President. I do not think it requires a vote.
Parlamentet har allerede vedtaget dette den 29. oktober. ber.
Parliament already decided on 29 October.
Formanden. — Formanden for udvalget har udtalt, at han ønsker sagen debatteret og behandlet.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Maher, I take your point. We are going to have a full discussion on this, as you know, on Wednesday.
Det er muligt, at De har en anden opfattelse, hr. Provan.
Mr Andriessen is here and has certainly heard what you said.
Formanden. — Hr. Maher, De ved sikkert, at vi vil afholde en udførlig forhandling herom på onsdag.
PRESIDENT. — The chairman of the committee has said that he would wish it to be debated and discussed.
Hr. Andriessen er til stede og har sikkert hørt. hvad De sagde.
That may be your opinion but obviously it is not the opinion of the chairman, Mr Provan.
De punkter, jeg rejste, er dem, jeg er involveret i på Parlamentets vegne.
The points that I raised were those that I am involved in on behalf of Parliament.
Jeg var ikke involveret i de drøftelser. De henviste til.
I was not involved with the discussions you referred to.
Formanden. — På mødet i formiddag pålagde for mændene for de politiske grupper mig at forelægge følgende forslag for Parlamentet til den dagsorden, som Det Udvidede Præsidium vedtog den 15. juni 1988.
PRESIDENT. — At this morning's meeting, the chairmen of political groups instructed me to submit the following proposals to the House concerning the draft agenda adopted by the enlarged Bureau on 15 June 1988.
Provan (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, Parlamentet har jo allerede henvist betænkningen og sagt. at den ikke bør opføres igen, før Domstolen har afgivet sin udtalelse.
PROVAN (ED). — Mr President, with respect, Par liament has already referred it back and said that it should not be taken on the floor of the House until the Court of Justice has delivered its opinion.
Den har allerede afgivet en udtalelse vedrøren de den franske regering, men der er også en verserende sag mod den tyske regering.
It has delivered one opinion in the matter of the French case but there is also a case outstanding against the German Government.
Dette spørgsmål vil til sin tid blive behandlet ved Domstolen.
That case will come before the Court of Justice in due time.
Hele tanken med at henvise betænkningen var, at man skulle afvente disse ting, fordi man her sætter sig ud over artikel 30 i Rom-Traktaten.
The whole point of referring it back was to await those matters because it flies in the face of Article 30 of the Treaty of Rome.
Dette er sagens egentlige substans, og jeg ønsker ikke at henvise til substansen.
That is the very substance of the matter and I do not want to refer to substance.
Men Parlamentet har allerede truffet en afgørelse.
But Parliament has already decided.
Prout (ED). - (EN) Hr. formand, den 29. oktober 1987 henviste Parlamentet Le Rouxbetænkningen til Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Ernæring med den
The Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food quite
Sabv sagt, at betænkningen er ændret for at tage hensyn til den sag, som verserer ved Domstolen.
SABY (S). — (FR) Mr President, the chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has just said that the report was amended to take account of the case pending before the Court.
Jeg mener følgelig, at vi bør følge udvalgets og dets formands opfattelse.
I think, therefore, that we should follow the advice of the committee and of its chairman.
Klepsch (PPE). — (DE) Hr. formand, min gruppe er af den mening, at vi bør følge hr. Colino Salamancas forslag.
KLEPSCH (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, my group thinks we should follow Mr Colino Salamanca's pro posal.
Vi deler ikke hr. Provans opfattelse.
We do not agree with Mr Provan in this matter.
Formanden. — På mødet i Det Udvidede Præsidium nåede vi til enighed om, at det efter vor opfattelse ikke var påkrævet, at Udvalget om Eksterne Økonomiske Forbindelser holdt møde.
PRESIDENT. — At the enlarged Bureau meeting we agreed that it was not necessary in our opinion for the Committee on External Economic Relations to meet.
Jeg mødtes også med hr. Mallet, og tyve minutter senere anmodede han om, at udvalget kunne træde sammen.
I subsequently saw Mr Mallet and 20 minutes ago Mr Mallet requested that his committee should meet.
Han mener, at der nu er gode grunde til et møde, hvorfor jeg kan tillade, at et sådant møde finder sted i morgen for middag.
He believes there are good reasons now for meeting and, therefore, I would support such a meeting tomorrow morning.
Formanden. — Jeg mener ikke. at vi har noget andet alternativ end at stemme, idet vi erindrer os det af hr. Provan fremførte synspunkt.
PRESIDENT. — I think we have no alternative but to vote on this bearing in mind the point that Mr Provan made.
Mallet (PPE), formand for Udvalget om Eksterne Økonomiske Forbindelser. — (FR) Hvis tingene for melt skal kunne komme i orden, tror jeg det er på krævet, at vort udvalg holder møde i morgen formiddag. dag.
MALLET (PPE), Chairman of the Committee on External Economic Relations. — (FR) I think in fact that in order that matters be formally in order, our committee must meet tomorrow morning.
(Det vedtoges at bibeholde betænkningen på dagsordenen) denen)
(Parliament decided that the report should remain on the agenda)
Klepsch (PPE). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg er noget forvirret og vil gerne vide, hvilke konsekvenser dette vil have.
KLEPSCH (SOC). — (DE) Mr President, I am some what confused and would like to know what that means.
Skal vi forhandle herom i denne uge eller ikke?
Will we discuss it this week or not?
Punktet er opført på dagsordenen, men hvis der skal være et møde i udvalget, ville jeg være indforstået hermed, hvis det fandt sted inden forhandlingen. gen.
It is an item on the agenda, but if you want to convene a committee meeting, I would agree to it taking place before our debate.
Prout (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, selv om jeg accepterer Parlamentet afgørelse, vil jeg dog gerne frem føre, at det i skrivelsen fra Retsudvalget til Dem vedrørende Le Rouxbetænkningen fremgik, al det efter udvalgets opfattelse ville være uforeneligt med Parlamentets pligter endog at bringe sig selv i en stil ling, som kunne ses som et forsøg på at påvirke en domstolsafgørelse.
PROUT (ED). — Mr President, accepting that that is the decision of the House, I would just like to point out that in the letter the Legal Affairs Committee wrote to you on the Le Roux report it was stated that it would in the committee's view be incompatible with those duties for Parliament to even put itself in a position which could be seen as attempting to influence a decision of the Court.
På baggrund af dette råd til for manden håber jeg, at man, når vi kommer til afstem ningen om Le Roux-betænkningen, vil bringe dette i erindring.
In view of that advice given to the Presidency I hope that when it comes to the vote on the Le Roux report this will be borne in mind.
Formanden. — Hr. Klepsch, vi drøftede udførligt her til formiddag.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Klepsch, we discussed this at length this morning.
Og punktet blev opført på dagsorden en. *
As far as we are concerned it is on the agenda.
Jeg håber ikke kun at det vil blive bragt i erindring, men at vi også vil holde lidt kontrol hermed nu og da.
I think not only will it be borne in mind, but we shall do a little checking between now and then.
Tirsdag
Tuesday:
Afstemningen vil afhænge af to ting: For det første af den rapport vi modtager fra Kommissionen.
The vote will depend on two things. The first is the report we receive from the Commission.
Hr. De Clercq vil formodentligt udarbejde denne rapport, og vi vil umiddelbart herefter afgøre, om vi vil stemme eller ikke.
Presumably Mr de Clercq will be making that report and we shall then consider immediately afterwards whether we vote or not.
Afstemningen vil dernæst afhænge af, hvilke betragtninger hr. Mallet fremfører på udvalgets vegne.
Secondly, it will also depend now on the views that Mr Mallet may put forward on behalf of the committee. mittee.
Rådet har på ny forelagt spørgsmålet.
The Council has approached us again.
Udvalget om Eksterne Økonomiske Forbindelser skal som dets formand har sagt afgive udtalelse, da vi ellers ville skabe en meget alvorlig præcedens for Europa-Parlamentets ret til at udtale sig.
The Committee on External Economic Relations must, as its chairman has said, give us its opinion, otherwise we would be creating an extremely serious precedent for the right of the European Parliament to decide.
Under mødet mellem gruppeformændene i formiddag var jeg af den opfattelse, af Udvalget om Eksterne Økonomiske Forbindelser endnu engang burde beskæftige sig med sagen.
At the meeting of group chairmen this morning I took the view that the Committee on External Economic Relations ought to look at it again.
Men det hed sig, at formanden for Udvalget om Eksterne Økonomiske Forbindelser var af den mening, at dette ikke var nødvendigt.
But I was given to understand that the chairman of that committee did not consider that
Formanden. — Hr. Sutra De Germa, det er for øje blikket dagsordenen vi drøfter. Det punkt.
It is creating a precedent to refer the protocols back to the committee.
Dagsordenen for tirsdag vil fortsætte med forhandling under ét om fire mundtlige forespørgsler om Sydafrika (dok. B2-467/88. B2-468/88.
However, as Mr Fich has said, I think even that would be better than be relegated to the ignominy of a Thursday vote at the July session when people's minds will already be very largely elsewhere.
B2-469/88 og B2470/88) efterfulgt af betænkninger og mundtlige fo respørgsler om transport, således som det fremgår af dagsordenen (dok. A2-120/88, B2-471/88. A2329/87, A2-5Ó/88. B2-399/88, B2-465/88.
As Mr Fich referred to the fact that he had been in consultation with the coordinators of the different groups and also bearing in mind the point Mr Sherlock has just made that the vote may not take very long.
Fich (S). — Hr. formand, jeg tror. at de fleste i Par lamentet tillægger hr. Schmids beretning (dok.
CROUX (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, we said exactly the opposite this morning with reference to the procedure for the Evrigenis report on racism and for the report of Sir Jack Stewart-Clark on drugs.
A2120/88) meget stor betydning, den er jo resultatet af det undersøgelsesudvalg, som har været nedsat til at undersøge transport og håndtering af nukleart materiale.
We also gave Parliament time to study the report, consider the resolutions and submit any amendments.
Derfor er det meget vigtigt, at såvel forhandlingen som afstemningen finder sted på fornuftig vis.
If we now depart from this procedure, we shall be creating a dan­gerous precedent, and so I think that the decision taken unanimously this morning by the chairmen of the political groups is far preferable.
Jeg er lidt betænkelig ved. at forhandlingen nu ser ud til at blive senere end forudset, og når jeg læser forslaget til dagsorden, må jeg konstatere, at afstemningen først finder sted torsdag aften.
Besides, Mr Fich and Mr Sherlock seem to agree that we should not take things too quickly, which is why they have pro­posed that the question be postponed until September.
Med al respekt vil jeg mene, at det er en lille smule upassende, at der går mere end to døgn mellem forhandlingen og afstem ningen, især i en så vigtig sag.
In my opinion it would be inadvisable to vote on Wednesday without knowing all the facts, as many of our colleagues will have been unable to consider the report and the motions for resolutions.
Croux (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, i formiddags sag de vi præcist det modsatte, og vi henviste til proceduren' på baggrund af Evrigenis-betænkningen om racisme og på baggrund af Sir Jack Stewart-Clarkbetænkningen om narkotika.
FICH (S). — (DA) Mr President, I think that most of us in Parliament attach very great importance to Mr Schmid's report (Doc. A 2-120/88).
Vi har altid givet Parlamentet tid til at undersøge betænkningen, til at se på beslutningerne, til eventuelt at stille ændringsforslag.
It constitutes the findings of the Committee of Inquiry which was set up to investigate the transport and handling of nuclear material.
Derfor tror jeg, at den afgørelse, der vedtoges enstemmigt her i formiddag af gruppeformændene, var langt bedre.
It is very important therefore that both the debate and the voting be conducted in a sen­sible manner.
I øvrigt tror jeg, at hr. Fich og hr. Sherlock er enig med mig i, at vi ikke må gå overilet til værks. Derfor foreslog de en udsættelse af sagen til september.
I am rather concerned by the fact that it now looks as though the debate will be held later than planned and, when I read the draft agenda, I see that the vote is not to take place until Thursday evening.
Jeg tror ikke, at det er godt. at vi stemmer på onsdag uden tilstrækkelig kendskab til sagen, uden at mange kolleger har kunnet stifte bekendskab med denne beretning og beslutningsforslagene.
With respect, I think it somewhat inappropriate that more than two whole days should elapse between the debate and the vote, especially on a matter of such importance.
Formanden. — Jeg tager Deres bemærkninger til ef terretning, men anmodningen er blevet fremsat, og der skal træffes en afgørelse.
PRESIDENT. — I take your point but the request has been made and a decision will have to be taken.
Må jeg på egne vegne og på vegne af både Den Kris-telig-Demokratiske Gruppe og Den Liberale Gruppes koordinatorer foreslå, at man exceptionelt accepterer, at der stemmes om denne sag onsdag aften kl. 17.00 sammen med de andre ting vedrørende Fællesakten.
I should like, on my own behalf and on behalf of the coordinators of the Christian-Democratic and Liberal Groups, to propose that we agree, exceptionally, to take the vote on this matter at 5 p.m. on Wednesday, together with the other questions relating to the Single Act.
Jeg ved. det er en usædvanlig procedure, men jeg mener, at det politisk er meget vigtigt.
I know it is an unusual procedure, but I think that it is very important politically.
Skulle De ikke acceptere dette. hr. formand, vil jeg ærlig talt fore trække, at man udsætter hele afstemningen til september: torsdag aften er ikke et passende tidspunkt at stemme om en så vigtig ting.
Should you not accept this, Mr President, quite honestly, I would prefer to have the whole vote put off until September. Thursday evening is not a suitable time to vote on such an important matter.
Bloch von Blottnitz (ARC). - (DE) Hr. formand, sagen er helt anderledes her end ved alle de andre undersøgelsesudvalg.
BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ (ARC). — (DE) Mr President, the situation here is quite different from that of all the other committees of inquiry.
Der foreligger en fælles beretning fra alle grupperne.
We have a joint report by all the Groups.
Denne beretning er vedtaget enstemmigt, hvorfor der ikke kan blive nogen lang afstemning, da der ikke vil blive stillet nogen ændringsforslag.
The report was adopted unanimously and the vote cannot go on very long because there will not be any amendments to it.
Situationen er helt klar. og de som traf afgørelse her til formiddag — selv om den var en stemmig — var dårligt informeret.
Here we have a situation that is quite plain and those who decided — unanimously — this morning must simply have been misinformed.
Jeg anmoder følgelig om, at De står ved Deres afgørelse.
So I would ask you to uphold your decision.
Sagen er helt klar, og vi kan heller ikke blive bedre informeret fra onsdag aften til torsdag eftermiddag.
The matter is quite clear and nor is it possible to become better informed between Wednes­day night and Thursday afternoon.
Undskyld, men det er virkelig et fjollet påskud.
I am sorry, but those really are silly excuses.
Jeg beder Dem fastholde, hvad De har besluttet, da dette er det rig tige.
Please adhere to what you decided, as it was right.
Sherlock (ED), formand for Undersøgelsesudvalget om Håndtering og Transport af Nukleart Materiale. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er enig med hr. Fich og hans forslag om. hvornår denne afstemning skal finde sted.
SHERLOCK (ED), Chairman of the Committee of Inquiry into the Handling and Transport of Nuclear Materials. — Mr President, I must agree with Mr Fich and his proposal as to when this vote might be taken.
Det ser ud til, at tiden og tidsplanen for afstem ning kl. 17 i morgen er på vor side, og at dømme ud fra den enighed, der er om både proceduren og de fleste undersøgelsesresultater, mener jeg ikke, at en afstemning bør blive nogen særlig langvarig procedure. re.
It looks as if time and the programme for voting at 5 p.m. tomorrow could well be on our side and judg­ing by the amount of agreement on this procedure as well as on the greater part of the findings, I do not think a vote should be a very long procedure.
Formanden. — Det lader til, at afstemningerne i hen hold til Fællesakten kl. 17 onsdag sandsynligvis ikke vil tage længere end en halv time.
PRESIDENT. — It would appear that the votes under the Single Act at 5 p.m. on Wednesday will probably take no longer than half an hour.
Vi kunne gå over til det pågældende punkt kl. 17.30.
We could deal with this matter at 5.30 p.m.
Hr. formand, jeg vil bede Dem tillade, at afstemningen finder sted onsdag.
I would ask you earnestly to allow us to do it on Wednesday.
De ved sikkert, at alle med lemmer af udvalget har bestræbt sig på at overholde tiden og de forpligtelser, vi så nøje fik pålagt.
Mr President, you will know how every member of that committee has striven to keep within our time limits and within the constraints that were so strictly imposed upon us.
(Det vedtoges at foretage afstemning umiddelbart efter afstemningerne onsdag i henhold til Fællesakten)
(Parliament accepted the proposal to take the vote immediately after the votes under the Single Act on Wednesday)
Formanden. — Vi vil forsøge at få resultaterne om delt, hr. Staes(').
STAES (ARC). — (NL) Mr President, may I ask you to urge the printers to make the documents available for tomorrow, given that the full report on nuclear waste has not yet been printed, and this could make it difficult to discuss the matter on Wednesday.
Formanden. — Vi vil forsøge at finde ud af. hvad der er blevet af disse 60 minutter og senere komme ind på det, hr. Klepsch.
But that is not even the question; what is at issue is the 60 minutes which do not even appear.
(Formanden oplæste ændringerne til dagsordenen for onsdag og torsdag (2))
(The President read out the changes to Wednesday's and Thursday's agenda)2
(Den således ændrede dagsorden vedtoges)
(Parliament adopted the agenda as amended)?
Pearce (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, må jeg havde lov at rejse spørgsmålet om den hurtighed, hvormed Præsidiet besvarer spørgsmål fra medlemmerne?
PEARCE (ED). — Mr President, may I take this opportunity to raise with you the question of the speed with which the Presidency answers questions put to it by Members.
Jeg har ikke fået noget svar på nogle spørgsmål, jeg stillede den 9. oktober og den 16. november sidste år samt den 16. februar i år.
I do not seem to have had answers to questions which I submitted on 9 October and 16 November of last year and 16 February of this year.
Jeg har heller ikke modtaget svar på tre spørgsmål fra 3. maj i år eller på den rykkerskrivelse, som jeg sendte til Deres kontor den 27. maj.
I certainly have had no answers to three questions I submitted on 3 May this year, nor to the chase-up let ter which I sent to your office on 27 May.
Garcia Arias (S). — (ES) Hr. formand, den portugisisk sprogede dagsorden og den portugisiske ordlyd af Garcia Arias-betænkningen (dok. A267/88) om kvindernes arbejds- og beskæftigelsesmæssige situation i Spanien og Portugal indeholder følgende titel: »om kvindernes situation i Spanien og Portugal«.
GARCÍA ARIAS (S). — (ES) Mr President, in the Portuguese language versions of the agenda and text of my report (A 2-67/88) on women's employment and working conditions in Spain and Portugal, the title of the report is given as 'On the position of women in Portugal and Spain'.
Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne bede Dem udvirke, at den portugisiske tekst ændres, samt fremføre, at den mest præcise ordlyd er den spanske: »om kvindernes ar-bejds- og beskæftigelsesmæssige situation i Spanien og Portugal«.
For the record, Mr President, I should like to correct the Portuguese wording and point out that the report's original Spanish title 'On the position of women in Spain and Portugal as regards their conditions of work and employ ment' more accurately describes its content.