natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
politik, Energi, Forsknings- og Teknologiudvalget og også for Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder, som igennem tre år meget omhyggeligt har arbejdet med dette direktivforslag.
I should like by the way to point out to all those who utter lofty phrases about protecting performing artists and others involved in production that in the case of some Member States we are creating this right for the first time.
Den hen vistes da til fornyet udvalgsbehandling, fordi spørgsmålet om landmandsprivilegiet ikke var løst.
These debates, including today's, have shown that pro tection for performing artists, to which we attach great importance and which has been achieved to a satisfactory extent in the rental and lending directive, is more extensive than that which exists in most Member States.
Nu konstaterer jeg, at der foreligger en fælles holdning i Parlamentet og Kommissionen til løsning af spørgsmålet om land mandsprivilegiet.
That may be different in Denmark, but we cannot always be guided by Denmark, although we often are, and we have to look at the situation as it exists in the other Member States.
Ud af 33 ændringsforslag kan vi altså acceptere de 23. Jeg synes, at det er et nyt eksempel på, at vi arbejder godt sammen.
The rapporteur, with the support of some other speakers, has suggested that the standard should be raised just in relation to performing artists and for satellite broadcast ing.
Jeg beder Dem have forståelse for, at vi ikke kan overtage samtlige ændringsforslag.
This would create a special law for satellite broad casting.
Jeg har givet Dem begrundelsen derfor.
That would lead to a proliferation of differences in the law.
Også det bør være muligt: Man skal også kunne sige, hvorfor man ikke accepterer et ændringsforslag. Det mener jeg, at alle bør anerkende!
And there is no objective reason for this as Mr Hoppenstedt rightly pointed out.
I april stemte vi så om ændringsforslagene fra Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder. Der opnåedes stort flertal derfor.
The Com mission agrees with the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights that this directive simply defines the legal framework.
Betænkningen henvistes på ny til udvalgsbehandling, fordi der i mellemtiden var opstået nogle divergerende holdninger i Parlamentet og Kommissionen, som imidlertid kunne skaffes af vejen under forhandlingerne med Kommissionen.
What individuals make out of this legal framework under a specific market situation is not the concern of the directive.
Jeg vil derfor spørge næstformanden i Kom missionen, om Kommissionen er enig i, at et medlem sland ikke kan gøre sin indflydelse gældende, ikke kan påvirke denne undtagelse.
The amendments, namely Nos 14, 25, 28 and 30, were quite incompatible with the considerations expressed by Mrs Junker and the principle of legal coherence.
Eller kan det?
As a result we cannot accept them.
Jeg vil gerne omtale et par centrale punkter i Parlamentets og Kommissionens fælles holdning.
I should like to thank him and make a few other comments even in areas where I do not agree.
Første punkt: Der findes et ændringsforslag, som Kommissionen accepterer, og det lyder: »Den menneskelige krop eller dele heraf kan ikke patenteres«. Denne ordlyd er klar og entydig og kan ikke fortolkes!
Apart from certain technical details, we accept the amendments from the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights as valuable supplementary points.
Klar, entydig og hævet over enhver tvivl!
Firstly on the question of satellite broadcasting.
BANGEMANN, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (DE) Fru formand, antallet af radiofonier kan ikke overskues ved indgåelse af en kontrakt om kabelviderespredning.
The aim of this section is to put an end to a theory of communication which is quite impracticable as far as the Community is concerned because satellite broadcasting can be prevented by one of the recipient countries.
Derimod ved enhver kabelnetvirksomhed, hvilket pro gram den leder ind i nettet.
The directive specifies that satellite broadcasting, in accordance with the general principles of the internal market, should rely on the principle of the country of origin.
Følgelig er udvidelse af udnyttelsesselskabspligten til at omfatte radiofoniernes egne og afledte rettigheder efter vor opfattelse ikke nødvendig.
Permission for such broadcasts is a matter for negotiation solely in the country of origin.
For øvrigt, fru Breyer, det er den ordlyd, De foreslog, og som jeg overtog.
In the field of cable transmission, the Commission is only proposing rules for exercising the right to cable diffusion.
For at undgå misforståelser gælder det for øvrigt også for det tilfælde, at man ved hjælp af et menneskeligt gen fremstiller et medikament, som patenteres, men ikke det menneskelige gen.
I think that together with the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights we have arrived at a system of checks and balances which is preferable to forcing the parties involved to agree.
Sætningen, at den menneskelige krop eller dens dele ikke kan patenteres, gælder uden nogen som helst indskrænkninger ninger
We therefore can accept all amendments which clarify that: Nos 9, 18, 19, 20 and Nos 22, 26 and partly No 31.
Også det er en fælles holdning hos Parlamentet og Kommissionen.
Nor do we have any problems with Amendment No 23 which comes into this category.
Skulle der derimod, som allerede Lord Inglewood sagde, opstå nye problemer som følge af videreudviklingen måske også af teknikken, så kan man tage sagen op igen. For så vidt en rettighedsindehaver har overdraget en radiofoni rettighederne til primær udstråling og viderespredning pr. kabel, udøves rettighederne til viderespredning pr. kabel af radiofonien og ikke af en rettighedshaverorganisation.
Amendment No 20, which is reformulated by Nos 22, 26 and 31, creates a problem in that it calls for the creation of an authority whereas the different Member States have quite different traditions for resolving disputes between contracting parties, especially by the parties involved themselves and these often work very well.
Derfor mener vi ikke, at der skal gives regler for denne situation, men skulle der, hr. Anastassopoulos, vise sig problem af en eller anden art, kan vi komme tilbage til sagen.
I therefore cannot understand at all why there should be only one solution, namely an independent authority, which need not necessarily function any better.
Også under de videre forhandlinger kan vi uddybe spørgsmålet endnu en gang.
The Commission sees no need to give preference to this solution.
FORMANDEN. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
We therefore are prepared to accept 23 of the 33 amend ments.
Afstemningen finder sted onsdag kl. 18.00.
I think that isa further example of how well we are working together.
Man kan ikke på et sted komme med et ændringsforslag, der vender op og ned på hele direktivet.
I would ask you to understand that we cannot accept all the amendments. I have given the reasons for this.
FORMANDEN. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er tredje betænkning (dok.
The country of origin approach must not, however, harm the interests of those creating the programmes.
C3-36/89 —SYN 159) til direktiv om retsbeskyttelse af bioteknologiske opfindelser.
That was our starting point and at the same time our objective.
I to ændringsfor slag siges det, at de respektive forudsætninger for udstedelse af et patent efter national ret skal være opfyldt, og hertil hører selvfølgelig også, at det skal dreje sig om en opfindelse.
We are seeking to combine this protection with the principle of the country of origin so that the kind of criticisms made by the speakers from the Green Group are completely without foundation.
Det vil sige, at menneskelig medvirken er påkrævet.
ANASTASSOPOULOS (PPE). — (GR) Madam President, I would like to put a question to Mr Bangemann.
Det, der forekommer i naturen, er uden men neskeligt indgreb ikke patenterbart, og selv om det skulle forholde sig anderledes i Amerika, og selv hvis Den Europæiske Patentmyndighed skulle have patenteret gener, uden at der har været tale om menneskelig indgriben, så er det en praksis, som i fremtiden bør indstilles.
Article 12 of the proposal for a directive exempts those employed in the broadcasting media, the broadcasters themselves in other words, from the obligation to proceed via collective organisations, so far as television, the cable retransmission of their own broadcasts is concerned.
ROTHLEY, ordfører. — (DE) Fru formand jeg er meget stolt over den grundige måde, hvorpå Europa-Parlamentet har behandlet dette direktivforslag.
This standard of protection was originally envisaged as a minimum.
Derimod gælder det for Udvalget om Økonomi, Valutaspørgsmål og Industri
However the debate on this directive goes in this House, we must under all circumstances avoid any discrepancy between other more extensive copyright directives and
ROTHLEY det er en del af indholdet i min betænkning for Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder.
ANASTASSOPOULOS cannot intervene in or influence that exemption? Or can it?
Grundtanken i dette ændrings forslag er, at man patenterer metoderne, men ikke pro dukterne.
It is clear, unequivocal and free from any confusion!
Faktisk var netop dette emne et af de fremtrædende stridspunkter under hele FN-konferencen i Rio om miljø og udvikling samt grunden til, at De Forenede Stater nægter at underskrive aftalen om arternes mangfoldighed.
BANGEMANN, Vice-President of the Commission. — (DE) Madam President, the number of broadcasting companies involved in contracts for cable transmission is relatively small. Every cable operator therefore knows which programme he is storing.
Vi kan ikke med god samvittighed tilslutte os en betænkning fra Parlamentet om det foreslåede EF-patent-direktiv, hvori ethvert hensyn til disse udvirkninger bevidst er holdt uden for diskussionen.
We therefore took the view that it was not necessary to extend the collecting society principle to the copyright and neighbouring rights of broadcasting companies.
Metodepatentet havde stor betydning, så længe det efter en bestemt metode fremstillede produkt ikke kunne formere sig.
Incidentally, Mrs Breyer, the wording is the one which you proposed and which I accepted.
Så måtte man have oplyst: Hvordan er det fremstillet?
That of course did not prevent you afterwards casting aspersions.
Hvis det fremstillede produkt derimod kan formere sig, så kommer det egentlig ikke længere an på metoden. Hvis jeg har et genmanipuleret produkt, der kan formere sig, som selv kan replikeres, så er det faktisk ret ligegyldigt, hvordan det er lavet.
It also applies, just to ensure there are no misunderstandings, to a case where a medicament is produced using a human gene and the medicament is patented but not the human gene.
Da det jo formerer sig af sig selv, behøver jeg ikke længere at vide, hvordan det i grunden er fremstillet.
This principle, that the human body or parts of the human body cannot be patented, applies without any restriction of any kind.
Det er kommet os for øre, at Bundessortenamt i Tyskland skulle have ladet forlyde, at også Kommissionen anser betænkningen for at være forældet.
Once again we have arrived at a common position with the Commission which specifies that inventions which relate to animals which, because of their form or genetic constitution, cannot be kept without detrimental effects to their health or wellbeing or which go beyond the natural boundaries of their species, cannot be patented.
Måske kan hr. Bangemann sige noget om det.
Once again this is a position agreed on between Parliament and the Commis-
Vil jeg derfor yde retsbeskyttelse på det bioteknologiske område, må den også omfatte produkterne, i hvert fald inden for de i betænkningen afstukne grænser.
In this case the directive applies but not via a collecting society because the rights for both types of diffusion have been conferred on the broadcasting company.
Jeg mener derfor, at nogle af de af en del af Den Liberale og Demokratiske Gruppes medlemmer nærede intentioner allerede omfattes af betænkningen.
We do not therefore believe that we need to take measures in such cases but if, Mr Anastassopoulos, any problems come up this is something we can look at again.
Jeg vil anbefale alle kollegerne i fred og ro at gennemlæse teksterne meget grundigt.
The vote will take place at 6.00 p.m. on Wednesday.
Jeg mener, at det nu er på tide, at vi stemmer om denne henstilling fra Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder, og jeg anbefaler Parlamentet at støtte udvalgets betænkning.
Let me briefly draw your attention to another aspect: If an amendment is tabled saying that patents on animals should not be allowed at all, then it would be much more honest to take the line adopted by Mr Lannoye and say: we reject the directive in its entirety.
Af disse grunde er vi af den opfattelse, at betænkningen i overensstemmelse med kravet fra sidste gang på ny bør henvises til fornyet udvalgsbehandling, så vort udvalg får mulighed for at afgive sin udtalelse. Vi meddelte Dem, at den ville foreligge den 16. oktober. Det ville altså have være tidligt nok til denne mødeperiode, hvis man ikke havde lavet numre med os.
PRESIDENT. — The next item is the third report (Doc. A3-0286/92) by Mr Rothley, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(88) 0496 — C3-0036/89 — SYN 159) for a directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions.
Kan det ikke lade sig gøre, bør der nedsættes et undersøgelsesudvalg om patentering af levende væsener, hvori Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter, Energi, Forsknings- og Teknologiudvalget og Udvalget om Udvikling og Samar bejde...
If the situation in America is different and if the European patent office has already patented genes which exist without human inter vention, then that is a practice which will have to come to a stop in future.
... i fællesskab kan forberede Parlamentets videre drøftelser. ser.
The basic idea of this amendment is that processes can be patented but not the products.
TELKÄMPER (V), ordfører for udtalelsen fra Udvalget om Udvikling og Samarbejde. — (DE) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne takke hr. Rothley.
ROTHLEY (S), rapporteur. — (DE) Madam President, I am very proud of the thorough way in which the European Parliament has deliberated on this draft directive.
Hvor tit er vi så heldige tre på hinanden følgende gange indgående at kunne drøfte en betænkning, hvis nuværende version er nøjagtigt den samme, som den vi sidste gang henviste til fornyet udvalgsbehandling.
It does however apply to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology and the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights which has given careful consideration to this draft directive for three years.
Da De lå på hospitalet manipulerede udvalget —jeg bruger samme udtryk som i eftermiddag — så det, vi diskuterede, ikke kom til afstemning.
Today I am able to say that a common position has been reached between Parliament and the Commission to solve this question.
Hvis De havde søgt underretning, ville vort udvalgs position have været Dem bekendt.
In April we voted on the amendments from the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights.
Det stødte mig lidt, hr. Rothley, at De i dag sagde, at de, der foreslog henvisning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling, blot ville til sløre en ikke-indrømmet forkastelse.
The process patent was very important as long as the product produced by a certain process could not be duplicated.
Det er Dem bekendt, at vi — også jeg personlig — har bestræbt os på at få en drøftelse i gang om dette direktiv. Vi var enige om, at Kommissionens udkast, som blev forelagt i 1988, ikke fortjente en diskussion og en betænkning.
As soon as that happened you had to ask: how was it produced?
Derfor enedes vi om, at betænkningen skulle tilbagevises og Kommissionen tvinges til at forelægge et andet forslag.
If I have a product which was modified by genetic engineering and can reproduce itself, then it is pretty irrelevant how the product was produced.
Jeg vil blot anmode om, at de accepterer vort forsøg på at komme frem til en fornuftig løsning på dette spørgsmål og ikke skyder os tvivlsomme hensigter i skoene.
Therefore, if I am trying to provide legal protection in the field of biological engineering, then this must be extended to the products, at least within the limits which we have set in this report.
Men det beskæftigede Deres udvalg sig ikke med, det stemte kun om den gamle tekst, da De lå på hospitalet.
I therefore take the view that the intentions of that section of the Liberal and Democratic Group have already been covered by the report.
Jeg taler nu for Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter, og dette udvalg skal ikke gå fra sin holdning.
I should just like to mention a few of the central issues in this common position drawn up by Parliament and the Commission.
Vi fik opbakning i en skrivelse fra Bundesärztekammer — den har De også fået udleveret — og heri støtter man netop den skelnen, som vi gjorde gældende i
Firstly: there is an amendment which the Commission accepts to the effect that the human body
Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Land distrikter.
We had a very thorough debate in the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights.
Hvis der så patenteres, fremmer beskyttelse af opfindelser eller opdagelser ikke det tekniske fremskridt, det hæmmes tværtimod.
TELEKÄMPER (V), draftsman of the opinion of the Committee on Development and Cooperation. — (DE) Madam President, I really must congratulate Mr Rothley.
Netop det bekræfter Bundesärztekammer, hvilket bestyrkede de i Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter nærede betænkeligheder.
When before has it been our privilege to debate in depth a report three times which appears today in exactly the same form as that which we referred back on the last occasion?
eksperiment, som banede vej for genterapien.
We agreed that the Commission draft as submitted in 1988 was not worth a debate or a report.
I øjeblikket får en siciliansk dreng, hvis immunsystem er brudt sammen, genterapeutisk behandling af en professor på et laboratorium i Milano. Med bestemte viruspartikler som transportmiddel skal der indsluses korrekte kopier af adenosindeaminasegenet i de defekte celler.
Mr Rothley, you would have even more reason to be proud if you had found out what we discussed in the Committee on Development and Cooperation.
Det erdet første europæiske forsøg med genterapi.
If you had found out about this, then you would be familiar with the stance of our committee.
I mellemtiden har man indledt et lignende forsøg i den hollandske by Rijswijk.
We have received reports in a letter from the German Medical Association, which you have all seen, which emphasizes precisely this distinction as formulated by the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development.
Genterapi åbner nye behandlingsmuligheder, som ikke blot supplerer traditionel medicinsk terapi, men også konkurrerer med den.
Your committee took no account of this but simply voted on the original text while you yourself were in hospital.
Hvordan betragtes en sådan behandling, en sådan terapi juridisk ?
When it comes to protecting human, animal or vegetable life, it is never a question of inventions and always a question of discoveries.
Hvordan behandles disse videnskabsmænds eller virksomheders ophavsret?
If these are patented, this does not promote technological progress by protecting inventions or discoveries but hinders it.
Jeg mener, at ændringsforslag nr. 15 bør fortolkes således, at det ikke udelukker genterapi fra retslig beskyttelse. se.
The German Medical Association has confirmed and reinforced the misgivings felt by the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development.
Det er første gang, hr. Rothley, og det er det, der gør det så højeksplosivt, at menneskehedens ernæringsgrundlag sættes under ejendomsforbehold, første gang at afgifter skal erlægges eller kan forhindres, at bestemte planter og dyr kan benyttes til videreavl.
This is the first time, Mr Rothley — and this is what makes the issue so explosive — that humanity's food basis has been made private property, the first time that people are having to pay or can be prevented from using certain plants or animals for breeding.
Det ændrer heller intet ved det landmandsprivilegium, som De har forhandlet Dem frem til med Kommissionen, absolut intet, for bønderne skal betale, selv om de må dyrke, og De ved nøjagtigt, at Rådet...
The farmers' privilege arrangement which you have worked out with the Commission does nothing to alter this position because the farmers are still going to have to pay even if they are allowed to grow the crops and you know very well that the Council...
... det ved De, og her siger De noget andet.
...You know that and yet here you are saying something quite different.
Det synes jeg...
I find that...
I ændringsforslag nr. 16 tales der om offentlig orden eller god moral.
In this context I should like to ask the Commission a question.
Jeg har lært følgende: Selv om mangt og meget lyder godt, bør man undersøge, om det passer. Her tales om god moral, som vi ikke må tilsidesætte.
We have heard that the German authority responsible for registering varieties has been saying in Germany that the Commission also regards this report as obsolete and no longer valid.
Hvis en gruppe læger for to hundrede år siden havde foretaget en hjertetransplantation, ville det givetvis have været i strid med god moral.
For these reasons we take the view that this report, as last time, should be referred back so that our committee has an opportunity to present its opinion.
I nogle lande ville lægerne endog været endt på bålet.
We told you that this would be available on 16 October.
Nu er problemet at finde hjerter nok til helbredelse af patienterne, for ventelisten er lang.
It would therefore have been available on time for the sitting if we had not
Åbenbart er god moral en tidsafhængig variabel.
Debates of the European Parliament
Lad os drøfte retsbeskyttelse, udbredelse af viden, gen nemskuelighed og etiske spørgsmål andetsteds. De hører hjemme i en offentlig debat.
So please let us deal with legal protection, the dissemination of knowledge, transparency and ethical problems somewhere else.
Patentereren vigtig forudsætning for udbredelse af viden.
Patents are an important way of disseminating knowledge.
De, der er imod patentering af levende materiale, begunstiger dermed hemmeligholdelsen og nogle få store virksomheders monopol på viden.
Anyone who opposes the patenting of living material is thus encouraging secrecy and a monopoly of knowledge in a few large companies.
Patentering er ensbetydede med offentliggørelse og transparens.
Patenting means transparency.
For det andet var det hidtil ikke muligt at patentere mikroorganismer.
Secondly it has already been possible to patent micro organisms.
Inden for den videnskabelige udvikling har man imidlertid ladet grænsen mellem mikro- og makrobiologi flyde ud, og det må patentretten også tage hensyn til.
Scientific developments have however weakened the distinction between micro and macro-biology and patent law must take this into account.
For det tredje kan kun opfindelser patenteres, ikke opdagelser.
Thirdly only inventions and not discoveries can be patented.
Dermed har jeg allerede svaret hr. Graefe zu Baringdorf.
And this deals with the question raised by Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf. dorf.
ODDY (S). — (EN) Fru formand, dette forslag har vakt megen offentlig interesse og bekymring.
ODDY (S). — Madam President, this proposal has aroused much public interest and concern.
Mange af os har modtaget breve fra offentligheden, der udtrykker denne bekymring.
Many of us have received lobby letters from the public expressing that concern.
Der er en vis rædsel og frygt vedrørende dette direktiv.
There is a certain horror and fear about this directive.
For mange fremkalder det billeder, som er en krydsning mellem Frankenstein og dr. Mengele.
For many it conjures up a vision which is a cross between Frankenstein and Dr Mengele.
Der er en dobbelt frygt.
There is a twofold fear.