natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg har derfor på hele budgetudvalgets vegne forelagt denne anmodning.
That is diy I have tabled this proposal on behalf of the entire Committee on Budgets.
Prout (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er imod dette forslag fra hr. Cot, og det af flere grunde.
'ROUT (ED). — Mr President, I am against this prolosal by Mr Cot for a number of reasons.
For det første kræver min betænkning ligesom budgetbetænkningen kvalificeret flertal for at blive vedtaget.
Firstly, my eport, like the budgetary report, requires qualified iiajorities to succeed.
Det har altid været praksis i Parlamentet, at en vigtig afstemning om forretningsordenen finder sted før en budgetafstemning.
It has always been a tradition in his House that when an important vote on the Rules if Procedure takes place, it takes place before a udget vote.
Og vi ved alle, at i det øjeblik bud gettet er vedtaget, vil alle medlemmerne forsvinde, og flertallet på 260 stemmer er forduftet.
We all know that once the budget is oted, everybody will disappear and the majority of 60 required will evaporate.
Men denne afstemning er særlig vigtig, fordi vi har fået nye beføjelser med den europæiske fælles akt.
lut there is a special importance attached to this partiular vote, because we have been given new powers by he Single European Act.
Disse beføjelser træder i kraft den 1. januar 1987.
These powers will take effect n 1 January 1987.
Hvis vi ikke kan benytte disse beføjelser — og det kan vi måske ikke, hvis afstemningen udsættes — så vil vi ikke blot gøre os selv en bjørnetjeneste, vi vil også bryde vore bånd til de europæiske borgere, som har ret til ny demokratisk kontrol med de øvrige institutioner.
If we are not in a position to take avantage of those powers, and we may not be if the ote is delayed, then we will be not only doing a dis;rvice to ourselves but also breaking our faith with ie citizens of Europe who have the right to new emocratic controls over the other institutions.
Hvis jeg må sige det sådan med al respekt for Parlamentet, er det meget let — og jeg kunne selv meget let komme med indlægget — at angribe formandskabet på baggrund af ord og ikke handling.
ROGALLA (S), chairman of the Committee on Verification of Credentials. — (DE) Mr President, I am sorry, but I must draw the House's attention to a minor inconsistency.
Jeg håber imidlertid, at Par lamentet forstår, at jeg har gjort mit bedste for at bevæge Landbrugsministerrådet henimod beslutninger om disse tre afgørende løsninger. Jeg gør alt, hvad der er menneskeligt muligt, for at opnå disse beslutninger.
We have just adopted Amend ment No 77 in which it is rightly proposed by the chairmen of the political groups that the Committee on Verification of Credentials, of which I am chair man, should in future discharge its functions in a different manner.
Jeg fik faktisk at vide i går i en pressekommentar, at nogle af mine kolleger spurgte sig selv, om de ikke blev presset lidt for hårdt.
This amendment changes Rule 96 of the Rules of Procedure, together with the notes on the interpretation of Rules 11 and 96.
Det undskylder jeg ikke, Jeg mener, at landmændene i hele Fællesskabet gerne vil have beslutninger.
What has been overlooked, however, is that a corresponding change will also have to be made to Rule 6(2).
(Bifald fra den europæiske demokratiske gruppe)
Parliament rejected the proposal)
Formanden. — Jeg sætter anmodningen fra budgetudvalget om først at stemme om budgetforslaget for 1987 og dernæst om betænkning (dok.
I wanted to bring that to the attention of the House and ask for your advice as to how this difficulty can be cleared up.
A 2-166/86) af Stavrou om forretningsordenen under afstemning.
I want to ask you for your advice as to how this difficulty should be rectified.
(Anmodningen blev ikke imødekommet)
YRAUD (S). — (FR) Mr President, we are going to e spending a good part of the day riveted to our seats sting.
Jeg håber, at Parlamentet forstår, at ved at lade Rådet genoptage mødet på lørdag og arbejde i weekenden er formandskabet fast besluttet på at få noget gjort, hvis det i det hele taget er muligt.
Could you do something to ensure that we can e spared the draughts of cold air that are coming into ie Chamber from the air conditioning?
Det er jeg også person ligt fast besluttet på.
I think many f us will once again be going away from Strasbourg ith colds after this partsession.
Eyraud (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, vi bliver nødt til at bruge en del af dagen til at sidde her og stemme.
PROUT (ED), rapporteur. — Mr President, I simply want to thank certain people.
at overholde den meget korte frist, der nødvendigvis var fastsat for os.
Prout summer holidays and many of their weekends to meet the very tight deadline, of necessity imposed on us.
Over for dem og navnlig deres kon torchefer, hvis arbejde har været ret enestående, vil jeg give udtryk for min dybtfølte tak.
To them, and particularly to their head of division, whose work has been quite outstanding, I wish to express my heartfelt thanks.
For det tredje vil jeg gerne takke den halve snis politikere, der arbejdede i udvalget i seks måneder og brugte en hel del af deres tid på noget, som mange anser for at være et yderst kedeligt spørgsmål.
Lastly, the rapporteur has, wherever possible, take the initiative in simplifying and rendering more easil comprehensible the procedures, so as to speed up Pat liament's work, without however weakening its effi cacy or endangering the defence of the rights an > interests involved. The intention to abide by the demo cratic principles which must always guide the work c this Parliament, even when some compromise must b made in the interests of greater rapidity, efficacy o rationality of procedures, and which underlies the pro posed changes, should be stressed. Thirdly, I would like to thank the half-a-dozen politicians who sat on that committee for six months and devoted a great deal of their time to what many people consider to be an extremely boring subject.
Men frem for alt, selv om de kom fra både højre og ven stre side i Parlamentet, arbejdede de sammen i en samarbejdets og koordineringens ånd.
Above all, although they ranged from the right to the left of this Parliament, they worked together in a spirit of cooperation and coordination.
Jeg tror, at man vil se af det overordentlig store antal samstemmende ændringsforslag, som vi har haft i dag, hvilken grad af politisk samarbejde der var tale om.
I think you will see from the vast number of consensus amendments that we have had today what a degree of political cooperation there was.
Jeg tror, man kan lære noget af dette.
I think there is a lesson to learn from this.
Nemlig at hvis denne nye procedure skal fungere, er vi nødt til at begrave vore partipolitiske forskelle og sætte vor in stitutions interesser i første række. Jeg må sige, at det eksempel, koordinatorerne i udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender har givet ved udarbej delsen af dette dokument, varsler godt for fremtiden.
Namely, if this new procedure is going to work, we are going to have to bury our party political differences and put the interests of our institution first.
Det er nu op til os at gøre det nødvendige arbejde for fuldt ud at udnytte den mulighed, vi har fået.
It is up to us now to do the work necessary to take full advantage of the opportunity that we have been given.
Jeg glæder mig over det heldige udfald af denne vanskelige sag.
I should like to congratulate you on succeeding in a difficult task.
Falconer (S), skriftlig. — (EN) Jeg har ikke deltaget i denne afstemning og vil stemme imod betænkningen under den endelige afstemning.
It is to my great satisfaction that I have noted the spir in which the rapporteur accepted these alterations, an that this Assembly, albeit with some hesitation and certain number of misunderstandings, has adopte them, being convinced that they will render Parlia ment's Rules of Procedure clearer and less ambiguous
Rogalla (S), formand for udvalget til valgs prøvelse. — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg beklager at måtte gøre Parlamentet opmærksomt på et lille paradoks.
FALCONER (S), in writing. — I have not participated in this vote and will be voting against the report in the final vote.
En institution, der sidder og vedtager flere beføjelser til sig selv, er mere interesseret i sine egne interne anliggender, men tænker alligevel ikke på at bruge sine nuværende beføjelser til at sikre, at befolkningen har fundamentale rettigheder som f.eks. retten til ar bejde, retten til en værdig bolig, retten til et betryggende social- og sundhedsvæsen, retten til en passende uddannelse til alle, uanset alder, vederlagsfri, ret ten til reelt at tage del i de beslutninger, der berører deres hverdag, gennem en udvidelse af det reelle de mokrati i modsætning til retten til at stemme hvert femte år, en institution, der, med undtagelse af nogle få ærede medlemmer, er mere interesseret i at ophæve vor befolknings nuværende demokrati, fortjener ikke vor støtte.
An institution which sits and votes itself more power, is more interested in its own internal affairs, yet does not consider using its existing powers to ensure that its people have such basic rights as the the right to work, the right to decent housing, the right to adequate social and health services, the right to adequate education for all, irrespective of age and without charge, the right to really participate, through an extension of real democracy as opposed to the right to vote every five years, in the decisions that affect their everyday lives, an institution which, but for a few honourable Members, is more interested in removing our people's exist ing democracy does not deserve our support.
Det vil jeg gerne gøre Parlamentet opmærksomt på og rådføre mig med Dem, hvordan dette problem kan løses.
VANDEMEULEBROUCKE (ARC), in writing. -(NL) Even those who said no more than a cold an disillusioned 'yes' to the Single European Act becaus it does not go anything like far enough and, what more, because in itself it changes nothing unless th Council cooperates, even those Members of Parlia ment owe it to themselves to vote for this report, wit just as much enthusiasm as they said 'yes' to the Singl Act.
Enten kunne jeg nu formulere et sådant ændringsforslag mundtligt — der skal nemlig kun ændres to ord i en formulering, vi allerede har vedtaget — eller vi skal udsætte opgaven med at få det bragt i orden til et senere møde. Jeg beder om Deres råd om, hvordan dette problem kan løses.
My yes to this report is a reluctant yes becaus with it Parliament will give its activities a Kafkaesqu complexity, succumbing to a procedure which, I ca say with almost total conviction, will never be undei stood by more than half the Members and will, more over, leave very little time for initiatives of our owi This whole business leaves a bitter taste in the mout because Parliament is, as it were, surrendering to th initiatives or, to use a better word, the whims of th other institutions.
Prout (ED), ordfører. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil blot gerne takke visse personer.
PEGADO LIZ (RDE), in writing. — (PT) Mr Prout's report possesses three fundamental virtues: first of all, it provides an accurate interpretation of those sections of the Single European Act which refer to the reinforcement of Parliament's powers as an institution.
A2-166/86) af Stavrou for udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender om forslag om ændring af artikel 53 og 54 i forretningsordenen : vedtaget ønskeligt, men næppe opportunt — analyseret følger ne af fællessakten på Parlamentets interne virke og på de institutionelle relationer, navnlig når der er tale om forhandlingsprocedurer og ved anden-behandlingen, hvor man nu kræver samarbejde mellem Kom missionen, Rådet og Parlamentet.
A 2-166/86) by Mr Stavrou on behalf of ;he Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petiions, on a decision amending Rule 53 and 54 of the Hules of Procedure of the European Parliament: tdopted
Budget 1987 — Afstemninger
Budget 1987 — Votes
Formanden. — Jeg har fra Tomlinson m.fl., i over ensstemmelse med artikel 203, stk. 8, i EØF-traktaten modtaget et forslag (dok.
'RESIDENT. — I have received from Mr Tomlinson ind others, pursuant to Article 203(8) of the EEC Treaty, a proposal (Doc.
B2-1263/86) om forkastelse af det samlede budgetforslag for regnskabsåret 1987.
Β 2­1263/86) for overall ejection of the draft general budget for the 1987 inancial year.
Sluttelig har ordføreren så vidt muligt arbejdet i ret ning af forenkling og gennemsigtighed af procedurer ne, så Parlamentets aktion kan blive hurtigere, uden at det dog går ud over effektiviteten eller over vare tagelsen af de involverede rettigheder og interesser.
PRESIDENT. — That may be your opinion, Mr Curry, and of course I respect it but I must apply the Rules of Procedure as I understand them.
Af alle disse grunde er jeg enig i størstedelen af de foreslåede ændringsforslag.
I think that a motion for rejection can be taken after the vote on the amendments.
Arndt (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg er af den opfat telse, at dette forslag først kan sættes under afstemning efter afstemningen om ændringsforslagene, da vi endnu ikke ved, hvorledes budgettet kommer til at se ud : det vil vi først kunne se efter afstemningen.
IRNDT (S). — (DE) Mr President, I take the view hat this motion cannot be called until after the vote, or we simply don't know as yet what the final budget i going to look like — we shall not know that until fter the vote.
For sådan som budgettet for øjeblikket ser ud, ville jeg stemme imod forslaget.
As the budget now stands, I would vote gainst this motion.
Men hvis budgetudvalgets ændringsforslag ikke vedtages, bliver jeg nødt til at stemme for forslaget.
But if the proposals from the Committee on Budgets do not go through I shall have o vote for the motion.
Jeg har med glæde konstateret ordførerens gode mod tagelse af disse forslag, og at Parlamentet også har vedtaget dem om end med nogen tøven og misforståelser.
If the last vote establishes the budget, we then have a budget when we have taken the last vote.
Jeg er sikker på, at Parlamentets forretningsordenen derved er blevet mere klar og forståelig.
You cannot therefore take the last vote and establish the budget and then subsequently have another vote to overthrow it.
Tomlinson (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg går stærkt ind for hr. Arndts forslag.
'OMLINSON (S). — Mr President, I strongly sup­on Mr Arndt's proposition.
Men jeg forstår det således, at der er nogle medlemmer, som har en vis tvivl, om proceduren er rigtig.
I would willingly agree 3 it. I understand that one or two people have slight oubts about the legality of this procedure.
Hvis man ser på, hvor ulovligt det kunnen blive i henhold til artikel 199 i traktaten, så vil en mulig ulovlighed og de problemer, som opstår ved at udsætte dette indtil afstemningen er ovre, blegne i sammenligning med de andre ulovlig heder, vi ville blive indviklet i under afstemningen.
However, rhen you consider the illegality that we might be lvolved in under Article 199 of the Treaty, any otential illegality and the problems caused by putting lis off until the last vote pale into insignificance com­ared with the other illegalities that we will be ívolved in in the course of our vote.
Formanden. — Jeg har set nærmere på bestemmelser ne i forretningsordenen.
VON DER VRING (S). — (DE) We do have a pre­cedent, we have already done this once before.
Da der således ikke findes nærmere bestemmelser, mener jeg, at et sådant forslag kan fremsættes efter forhandlingen.
I believe, however, since 1ère are not explicit rules, that this proposal should be iken at the end of the debate.
Curry (ED), hovedordfører. — (EN) Hr. formand, når vi stemmer om budgettet, vil hver enkelt afstemning være bestemmende for budgettet.
URRY (ED), general rapporteur. — Mr President, as e vote on the budget each successive vote establishes ie budget.
Vi kan ikke så gå tilbage og vælte alt det, som vi har vedtaget ved hver enkelt afstemning.
We cannot then go back and overturn
Men som sagt i begyndelsen: Vi er nu for, men det er tænkeligt, at det ikke varer længe.
Those who do not agree with me have the right to criticize and I would ask them to use it.
Og det vil afhænge af Rådet.
At all events the question does not arise at the moment.
(Forslaget til afgørelse vedtoges)
It will come up in due course.
86 rencen 10 bør udgå for at sikre, at der ikke kan være nogen som helst tvivl om afstemningen.
Draft general budget of the European Communities for 1987 — modified by the Council
Der bør ikke være nogen henvisning til tal i anmærkningerne.
Let us first vote on the final amendment which I ha not noticed.
Curry (ED), hovedordfører. — (EN) Der er forskel på en almindelig betænkning og budgettet, hr. formand. I budgettet slutter vi ikke med et samlet dokument, som opsummerer hvad vi har gjort, og som vi kan forkaste.
CURRY (ED), general rapporteur. — The remarks on Article 320 have been incorrectly changed.
Vi tager det skridt for skridt.
There should be no reference to a figure in the remarks.
Derfor kan De sætte forslaget om forkastelse under afstemning ved begyndelsen — men når De først har indledt afstem­ningen om budgettet, kan De ikke gå tilbage.
ARNDT (S). — (DE) Mr President, before we vol on the last amendment we shall have to vote on th motion calling for the rejection of the budget as whole.
Curry (ED), hovedordfører. — (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne sige, at budgetudvalget var af den mening, at alle de ændringsforslag, som indebar en strid med Rådet vedrørende klassificeringen, ikke skulle stilles på ny.
CURRY (ED), general rapporteur. — Madam Presi­dent, I would like to point out that the Committee on Budgets considered that all amendments which involved the dispute with the Council concerning clas­sification should not be retabled.
Udvalget var følgelig af den mening, at det ændringsforslag til artikel 311, som var stillet under førstebehandlingen, ikke skulle stilles på ny.
It, therefore, took the view that the first reading amendment relating to Article 311 should not be retabled.
Det sam­me gælder artikel 313, 314, 321 og 332, hvor land­brugsudvalget har stillet ændringsforslag.
The same applies to Articles 313, 314, 321 and 332, where the Committee on Agriculture has tabled amendments.
Samme ar­gument gælder artikel 470 og 582 samt konto 9670.
The same argument applies to Articles 470 and 582 and item 9670.
Formanden. — Hr. Curry, Deres bemærkninger er taget til efterretning.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Curry, the Chair has noted your remarks.
Sir Fred Catherwood (ED). ­ (EN) Hr. formand, jeg mener, at den sidste afstemning om budgettet gør det færdigt, uden at der er behov for yderlig afstemning.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Stavrou, your report does m enter into force until January.
Hvis den sidste afstemning gør budgettet færdigt, så findes der et budget, når den sidste afstemning har fundet sted.
I shall therefore cor tinue to call the speakers who have asked to be heard
Efter afstemningen om ændringsforslag nr. 157
Following the vote on Amendment No 157
Vort forslag er derfor det næstsidste.
No 2-346/265 down the steps which must be taken in a situation such as this.
Von der Vring (S). — (DE) Der er præcedens, da vi allerede har gjort det således en gang før.
TOMLINSON (S). — Madam President, I know that At Stavrou has a problem there and I and my coleagues in the British Labour Group would be lelighted if in order to accommodate Mr Stavrou we leferred the vote on the motion for resolution and the ompletion of the discussion until the Committee on he Rules of Procedure and Petitions has had an ipportunity of looking at Mr Stavrou's position.
Formanden. — Da vi nu har stemt om alle ændrings­forslagene, sætter jeg nu forslaget om samlet forkas­telse (dok. B2­1263/86) under afstemning.
Report (Doc. A 2-190/86) by Mr Curry, on behalf of the Committee on Budgets, on the draft general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 1987, as modified by the Council — Section III — Commission (Doc. C 2-150/86)
Veil (LDR). — (FR) Fru formand, jeg tror De mang­ler at sætte ændringsforslag nr. 158 under afstem­ning.
Parliament adopted Amendment No 158)
Det stemmer vi naturligvis først om.
IN THE CHAIR: LADY ELLES
Forslag til almindeligt budget for De europæiske Fæl­lesskaber for regnskabsåret 1987, modificeret af Rå­det
The House ias now voted in favour of a 1987 budget which in the "ouncil's view exceeds the maximum rate of increase if non-compulsory expenditure.
Arndt (S). — (DE) Fru formand, vi må stemme om forslaget om samlet forkastelse af budgettet, inden vi stemmer om sidste ændringsforslag.
My group has some difficulty nevertheless in voting in favour overall, for there are still a large number of things that have not been achieved.
Det blev sagt før, at dette forslag måtte fremsættes inden det sidste ændringsforslag, for når det sidste ændringsforslag er vedtaget, er budgettet færdigt.
I sometimes wonder just what these political groups think they are doing when they table urgent motions on combating world hunger but then refuse to vote for the necessary budget appropriations.
Det har vi udtrykkeligt forbeholdt os.
Progress was made in the legotiations which have been conducted, but not nough.
Hvis de konservative havde fået deres vilje, ville vi havde stemt for forkastelse af budgettet; men da de har tabt i de fleste tilfælde, og da det store flertal har sat sin vilje igennem, vil vi stemme imod dette forslag.
But I want to stress that this ime it will be within a context in which the Comnunity is faced with much greater and much more ritical problems than those which separate the Counil and Parliament in the 1987 budgetary procedure.
Formanden. — Vi vil altså først stemme of forslaget om samlet forkastelse, hvorefter vi går tilbage til æn­dringsforslag nr. 158.
CHRISTODOULOU (PPE). — (GR) Madam Presi dent, the European Peoples' Party will vote in favour of the proposals by the Committee on Budgets, to avoid turning the Budget into a purely formal procedure without any real content.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
Christodoulou mind — it will be impossible for any fleet to be refui bished.
Curry (ED), hovedordfører. — (EN) Fru formand, hr. Arndt sagde lige, at hvis vi havde foretaget den sidste afstemning, ville vi ikke længere have kunne stemme for en forkastelse.
What can we expect to happen? Either the Counc will give in and align itself with the majority in Parlia ment — I don't think that is too likely — or, honoura ble Members, we are the ones who are going to hav to vote again.
Det er netop det, jeg fremførte ved begyndelsen af afstemningen, og som han på det tids punkt benægtede.
I think you are going to have to chang your votes in order to get a budget, because you can not operate without a budget.
Jeg er glad for, at han giver mig ret vilje til at tage de afgørende skridt.
In fact, there has been disregard for essential factors in our proposals relating to agricultural policy, which is the thorniest problem we face today.
Budgetmyndigheden er herved for andet år i træk ved ar bringe Fællesskabet i en vanskelig situation.
Unfortunately, this dilatori­ness of Council goes hand in hand with the total inflexibility which Council shows in its dealings with Parliament.
Men jeg ønsker at understrege, at denne gang vil det ske, samtidig med at Fællesskabet står over for langt større og langt mere afgørende problemer end dem, der adskiller Rådet og Parlamentet i budgetproceduren for 1987.
Colleagues, I will remind you that the sense of the European Court's decision last July was precisely that for final ratification of the general Budget, there must be agreement between the two bodies, in other words, Parliament and Council.
Kommissionen må derfor insistere på, ar de to institutioner påtager sig deres ansvar og hurtigst muligt når til enighed om 1987-budgettet, idet vi ikke be tragter proceduren som afsluttet, før en sådan enig hed er opnået.
Colleagues, Parliament has in fact proved its desire for constructive cooperation and substantial dialogue.
En enighed, som kan få Fællesskabet til at koncentrere sig om de virkelig finansielle pro blemer, vi står overfor netop nu.
And as for the specific effort to reach agreement which has just been made, I can say that seldom has there been so great a desire on the part of Parliament to agree with Council about the budget.