natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
von Wogau (PPE). — (De) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, denne afstemning er sikkert også en prøve på, hvor alvorligt Europa-Parlamentet mener det med sit mål at åbne grænserne mellem Det Europæiske Fællesskabs medlemslande.
VON WOGAU (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, this vote is certainly also a test to find out how serious the European Parliament actually is about aiming at opening up the borders between the Member
Europa­Parlamentets forhandlinger
States of the European Community.
Nr. 3­391/283 von Wogau udadtil af Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
Open borders within the EC means common borders vis-à-vis the outside.
Det betyder jo ikke, at der sker en forringelse, hvad angår asylret, udlændinges ret eller visa.
That does not mean a worsening of the situation regarding the right of asylum, aliens' law or visas.
Det er den store fejl, De begår, hr. Van Outrive!
That is the great mistake you are making, Mr Van Outrive!
Vi betragter denne Schengen­aftale mellem de fem lande som et pilotprojekt.
countries are planning to make provisional arrangements on these matters next week so that the 'Schengen system' of facilities can be got under way.
Det ville selvfølgelig have været bedst, om vi allerede nu kunne gøre det alle tolv, men da det ikke var muligt, ønsker vi, at der her gennemføres et pilotprojekt, hvor vi i første omgang kan samle erfaringer, som vi vil få hårdt brug for i 1992, for også da vil der stadig være vanskelige problemer at løse.
But I want to make very clear something that does not seem to have been appreciated by all the speakers.
de spørgsmål, der er løst, og som er i overensstem­melse med Traktaten og Den Fælles Akt, som de spørgsmål, der endnu ikke er behandlet, endnu ikke afsluttet, eller som Schengen­gruppen afslutter i de nærmeste dage, har fællesskabslovgivningen forrang, hvilket vil sige, at de af Fællesskabets institutioner og da især af Parlamentet udarbejdede regler skal gælde i hele Fællesskabet, også i Schengen­gruppens lande.
On all these matters, not only those that have been settled in accordance with the Treaty and the Single Act but also those that have not yet been discussed, or have not yet been settled or are likely to be in the next few days by the Schengen Group, Community law is going to take precedence. That means that the texts that are going to be drawn up by the Community institutions, Parliament in particular, will be binding throughout the Community, including the Schengen Group countries.
Det er derfor, vi kan betragte dette inte­ressante eksperiment som en foregribelse af udviklin­gen, og hvad angår de meget betragtelige vanskelig­heder, der med rette har været tale om her, som en afprøvning af midlerne til disse problemers løsning.
We can therefore look on this interesting exercise as a pilot operation and, where the very considerable difficulties legitimately raised here are concerned, as a trial of the means of solving these problems.
Tiden er ikke spildt for det samlede Fællesskab i dettes vanskelige bestræbelser på i tiden indtil den 1. januar 1993 at gennemføre fri bevægelighed for personer.
It will not be a waste of time in terms of the efforts by the Community as a whole to solve the complex problems of establishing free movement of persons by 1 January 1993.
Derfor kan jeg overhovedet ikke forstå, hvorledes man kan sige, at der ingen information er givet herom.
That is why I just cannot understand how anyone can say that no information was provided on the subject.
Hr. Dankert, tidligere medlem af Deres gruppe, har i denne mødeperiode været i Strasbourg og givet oplysninger om alle kritiske spørgsmål: Om spørgsmål vedrørende asyl, flygtninge, visumpolitik og meget andet.
Mr Dankert, a former member of your group, was here in Strasbourg during this partsession and has supplied information on all the crucial questions : the question of asylum, of refugees, visa policy and many others.
Hvad underretningen af Parlamentet angår, vil jeg direkte svare hr. de Vries, der var så elskværdig at henvende sig direkte til mig, at Kommissionen i næste uge vil anmode Schengen­partnere om at forelægger eller i det mindste tilsende Europa­Parla­mentet de tekster, der skal underskrives, da hele resten indgår i regeringssamarbejdet og kræver de samme ad /¡oc­procedurer, som også Kommissionen vil benytte...
On the matter of keeping Parliament informed, I would say to Mr De Vries in person, since he was kind enough to address me in person, that the Commission will be asking the Schengen partners next week to submit or at least communicate the texts that are to be signed to Parliament, given that all the rest is set in the intergovernmental framework and will require the ad hoc procedures that the Commission will also be using ...
Vi er blevet informeret, og der er jo heller ikke tale om ratificering endnu.
We were informed, and in any case it is not yet a question of ratification.
Der er tale om undertegnelse af aftalen, og dertil kommer ratificeringsprocessen i de nationale parlamenter.
It is a question of signing the agreement, which will be followed by the process of ratification by the national parliaments.
Derfor kan jeg slet ikke forstå, hvorfor det i det foreliggende beslutningsfor­slag kræves, at aftalen ikke undertegnes nu.
That is why I simply cannot understand why the motion for a resolution before us requests that the agreement not be signed now.
Vi vil i forbindelse med de to punkter, hvor det kræves, forlange afstemning ved navneopråb.
We will call for a roll-call vote on the two paragraphs that say that.
Forhandlinger under ét er afsluttet ')■ (Mødet udsat kl. 13.20 og genoptaget kl. 15.00)
The joint debate is closed. '
Dondelinger, medlem af Kommissionen. — (FR) Hr. formand, Kommissionen kunne som Parlamen­tets medlemmer have ønsket at have mere tid til rådighed til at udtale sig om en så alvorlig sag.
(The sitting was adjourned at 1.20 p.m. and resumed at 3.00 p.m.)
Første punkt: Fem medlemsstater har i dag for nøjagtigt fem år siden taget initiativet til at foregribe personers og varers frie bevægelighed inden for Fællesskabet. Det var ikke særligt ortodokst.
The first point is this: five years ago to the day, five Member States took the initiative of anticipating the introduction of free movement of persons and goods within the Community.
Kom­missionen var noget tilbageholdende, men da det var udtryk for ønsket om at fremme Fællesskabets udvikling, deltog Kommissionen som observatør i de senere stadier, og jeg mener, at denne deltagelse var nyttig og enstemmigt ansås for at være nyttig af alle både deltagende og ikke­deltagende parter.
The Commission had some misgivings, at least at first, but since this was a purposeful initiative inspired by a resolve to move the Communitv forward, the Commission took part in the later stages, as an observer, and I think its participation was useful and recognized as such by all who were present and by all those who were not involved in this exercise.
Det drejer sig om så vigtige emner som visumanliggender, indvandring, mulighed for retsforfølgelse i tilfælde af lovovertræ­delser og andet.
They include matters of such importance as visas, immigration, the right of pursuit in the event of an offence, and a number of other points.
') Resultatet af afstemningen: Se protokollen.
For the outcome of the vote: see Minutes.
Formanden. — Jeg forstår de motiver, der kan ligge bag Deres indlæg, men da Kommissionen ikke er disponibel i dag, er vi nødsaget til at holde fast ved, at denne redegørelse opføres på dagsordenen for i morgen.
A debate tomorrow is all right but would be irresponsible without a statement from the Commission today.
Det er et spørgsmål om Parlamentets deltagelse i fællesskabsbeslutninger, hr. for mand.
question of Parliament's participation in Community decisions, Mr President.
Det er nødvendigt, at dette telegram bliver afsendt, og ikke blot, at man tager vort ønske til efterretning, for vi har ikke tid til at afvente, at det bliver medtaget i protokollen.
It is necessary for this telegram to be sent and not just to be taken note of, for we do not have the time to wait for it to be recorded in the Minutes.
Jeg ønsker derfor, at det øjeblikkeligt henstilles til formanden at sende dette telegram.
I would therefore like an immediate and extremely urgent request to be made to the President to send that telegram.
Formanden. — Fru Valent, i forbindelse med hvad De lige har sagt, er det absolut nødvendigt, at formanden råder over oplysninger, som han ikke har for øjeblikket.
PRESIDENT. — Mrs Valent, as I said just a moment ago, it is absolutely essential that the President be in possession of the necessary information, which is not at present the case.
Jeg har noteret mig Deres bemærk ninger, og jeg skal hurtigst muligt søge at indhente disse oplysninger.
I take due note of your remarks and will seek the information you request with the utmost despatch.
McMiUan-Scott (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil tillade mig en bemærkning til dette punkt.
McMILLAN-SCOTT (ED). — Mr President, I crave the House's forbearance on this matter.
Kommissionen kan godt afgive en redegørelsen i morgen og Parlamentet afholde forhandling.
The Commission may make a statement tomorrow and Parliament may have a discussion.
Problemet er, at Kommissionen eller Rådet burde være i stand til i dag at give en form for svar på begivenhederne i Rumænien.
The concern is that the Commission, or indeed the Council, should be in a position today to make some sort of response to the events unfolding in Romania.
Jeg har netop været i kontakt med oppostionspartierne, hvis ledere — de to præsidentskandidater — er gået under jorden i dag i Bukarest på grund af pøbeloptøjerne i gaderne.
I have just been in contact with the opposition parties, the leaders of which — the two presidential candidates — have gone into hiding today in Bucharest, because of the mobs which are rampaging through the streets in that city.
Jeg har fået oplyst, at formanden for Rådet af udenrigsministre stadig opholder sig i Strasbourg og måske er i stand til at afgive en kort redegørelse i aften.
I understand, and I crave once again the forbearance of the House, that the President-in-Office of the Foreign Ministers is still in Strasbourg and may be in a position to make a short statement this evening.
I så tilfælde håber jeg, at Parlamentet vil finde tid til, at hr. Collins afgiver en sådan redegørelse, og det er alt, hvad jeg anmoder om på nuværende tidspunkt.
In that case I hope that Parliament will find time for Mr Collins to make such a statement and that is all I ask at this time.
von Alemann (LDR). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne tilslutte mig, hvad hr. McMillan-Scott sagde.
VON ALEMÁN (LDR). — (DE) Mr President, I wanted to speak on what the members of the European Democratic Group just said.
Situationen i Rumænien foruroliger os virkeligt dybt.
We really are very worried about the situation in Romania.
Der er således tale om to forskellige ting.
There surely are two different matters involved here.
De sagde, at Kommissionen først kan afgive en redegørelse i morgen, men hvis det faktisk forholder sig sådan, at rådsformanden endnu opholder sig i Strasbourg, kunne man i det mindste forespørge, om hr. Collins har mulighed for at kontakte os.
You said the Commission could not state its position until tomorrow, but if it is true that the President of the Council is still in Strasbourg today, surely one could at least ask or try to establish whether Mr Collins is able to allay our fears or to enter into contact with us. Could the presidency check that?
Vil De venligst undersøge dette?
That is slightly irrelevant.
Formanden. — Fru von Alemann, det var netop, hvad jeg mente, da jeg sagde, at vi måtte træffe øjeblikkelige foranstaltninger med henblik på at finde ud af, om det er muligt for rådsformanden at efterkomme Deres ønske.
PRESIDENT. — Mrs von Alemann, it was precisely to that end that I said we would be taking immediate steps to see whether it would be possible for the Council presidency to act in the way you have suggested.
Formanden. — Hr. McMillan-Scott, vedrørende Deres spørgsmål, om det i henhold til bestemmelserne i forretningsordenens artikel 56 er muligt for formanden at træffe en beslutning her og nu, mener jeg, at vi straks må træffe de nødvendige foranstaltninger og undersøge sagen.
PRESIDENT. — Mr McMillan-Scott, whilst I appreciate that under Rule 56 it is possible for the President to make an immediate decision, we consider it better to take urgent measures with a view to clarifying the situation.
Lane (RDE). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg kan oplyse, at jeg netop har spist frokost med rådsformanden.
LANE (RDE). — Mr President, by way of information, I have just had lunch with the President-in-Office.
Han er på vej til lufthavnen, men han kan om nødvendigt kontaktes der, hvilket jeg finder tilrådeligt. ligt.
He has left for the airport and may be back in the building again, but he can be contacted in the airport if it is necessary to do so, and I think it would be advisable if he could be so contacted.
Formanden. — Jeg har netop fået oplyst, at Kom missionen har erklæret sig rede til at afgive sin redegørelse i dag lige inden afstemningerne.
PRESIDENT. — According to the information I have just received, the Commission can make a statement before the vote, and indeed today.
Vi giver således i højere grad denne forhandling karakter af uopsættelig og aktuel debat, og vi forstår fuldt ud medlemmernes bekymring, men vi må ganske enkelt tage hensyn til de fysiske muligheder.
We are thus doing all we can to ensure this debate is as prompt and informative as possible — we fully appreciate the concerns of colleagues, but we do have to take some precautions as I have just explained.
Atypisk arbejde
Atypical employment
Formanden. — Jeg har noteret mig Deres bemærk ninger og vil undersøge sagen.
Can you tell me if that has been done, because clearly there is not much point in this Parliament expressing opinions on various subjects if we do not make sure that the people to whom we are addressing them are aware of them before they make the decisions?
Valent (GUE). — (IT) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne udtale min støtte til det, der blev fremsat af fru
PRESIDENT. — I take note of what you say and will look into the matter.
A3134/90) af Salisch for Udvalget om Sociale Anliggender, Beskæftigelse og
A3134/90) by Mrs Salisch, on behalf of the Committee on Social Affairs, Employment and the Working Environment, on an initiative aimed at a proposal for a directive on atypical employment contracts and terms of employment.
Arbejdsmiljø om et initiativ med henblik på et forslag til direktiv vedrørende atypiske arbejdskon trakter og -forhold.
Moreover — and this is of course what we regret — the Commission has left the back door open for unanimity.
bestemmelser vedrørende særlige arbejdsforhold.
We consider that procedure unacceptable.
Den tager tre delområder op: Deltidsbeskæftigelse, arbejde i perioder og arbejde på basis af daglejeaftaler.
Our working dialogue, to put it carefully, will therefore have to continue.
Det er kun tre former for atypisk beskæftigelse.
I am deliberately calling it a 'working dialogue'.
De dækker ikke på nogen måde helheden af alle atypiske former for arbejde, som vi i dag står overfor i Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
I can only hope that at the end of this dialogue between Parliament and the Commission we will establish a common procedure for the two institutions.
Det kritiserer dermed Rådets passivitet og endvidere Kommissionens tøven over for gen nemførelsen af det indre markeds sociale dimension.
In so doing it is criticizing the Council's failure to act and the Commission's delay in implementing the social dimension of the internal market.
Derudover vil Parlamentet skabe klare fronter i forbindelse med valget af retsgrundlaget for vedtagelsen af et — jeg understreger ét — direktiv om samtlige atypiske arbejdsforhold.
Moreover, it wants to clarify the positions in respect of the choice of legal base for the adoption of one — and only one — directive on atypical work as a whole.
For socialudvalget og for Parlamentet er det hævet over enhver tvivl, at artikel 100 A og 118 A i EØF-Traktaten er tilstrækkelige retsgrundlag for bestemmelser vedrørende disse arbejdsformer.
There is no question in the minds of the Committee on Social Affairs and Parliament that Articles 100a and 118a of the EEC Treaty (Single Act) form a sufficient legal base for regulating these forms of employment.
Jeg siger bevidst arbejdsdialog. Jeg kan kun håbe, at der ved afslutningen af denne dialog mellem Parlamentet og Kommissionen står en fælles fremgangsmåde for de to institutioner.
With the adoption of this directive in the European Parliament, with yesterday's Commission decision, we have the pre-conditions for such a dialogue.
Den, der vil gennembruddet i den sociale dimension, må ikke ty til andre retsgrundlag.
Anyone who wants us to break through into the social dimension must not try to evade this with other legal bases.
Det er disse spørgsmål, det drejer sig om i dag.
That is the question before us today.
Mere end 14 mio mennesker — de fleste af dem er kvinder — arbejder i usikre arbejdsforhold i Fællesskabet, helt uden eller uden tilstrækkelig social beskyttelse i tilfælde af sygdom, ulykker eller opsigelse.
More than 14 million people, most of them women, are employed under precarious working conditions in the Community, with no or only inadequate social protection, with no protection against sickness, accident or dismissal.
Med vedtagelse af dette direktiv i Europa-Parlamentet, med Kommissionens beslutning i går er der grundlag for en dialog.
This Parliament finds it intolerable that, in a Europe without frontiers, employees working under terms of employment with boundless flexibility, in temporary work, home work and ill-regulated part-time jobs, have no greater rights or security than the nineteenth century day-labourers or the seasonal workers at the beginning of the twentieth century.
Arbejdsfleksibiliteten øges.
Work is becoming increasingly flexible.
Det er efter min mening vor opgave at sætte en stopper for vilkårligheden på det fremtidige europæiske arbejdsmarked ved at vedtage minimumsnormer.
So I think it is up to us to adopt minimum standards in order to prevent any arbitrariness in the future European labour market.
Vi vil, at ubeskyttede arbejdsforhold fremover skal høre fortiden til.
We want unprotected working conditions to become a thing of the past.
Alle erhvervsaktive mennesker skal have en kontrakt, af hvilken bl.a. varigheden af arbejds- og hviletid, de krævede kvalifikationer, arbejdssted, arbejdstid, arbejdets art, lønnen samt de sundhedsfarer, som er forbundet med et bestemt arbejde, fremgår.
Every working person must have a contract specifying the duration of working and rest times, the necessary qualifications, place of work, hours of work, type of work and pay and any health risks involved in a specific type of job.
De atypisk beskæftigedes rettigheder skal fastsættes analogt med de fuldtidsbeskæftigedes.
The rights of those in atypical employment must be laid down in the same way as those of full-time workers.
Når grænserne på det indre marked falder, skal der være garanterede sociale minimumsrettigheder, dersom ulovlig konkurrence på bekostning af arbejdstagerne i faste arbejdsforhold skal undgås.
When the borders come down in the internal market, we must have guaranteed minimum social rights to prevent any unauthorized competition at the cost and to the detriment of dependent workers.
Regeringschefernes socialpagt og Kommissionens sociale handlingsprogram — de fortaber sig i tågen, hvis der ikke omsider kan udfærdiges vidtrækkende, juridisk bindende beslutninger på EF-plan.
The social charter set out by the Heads of Government, the Commission's social action programme, will remain castles in the air unless far-reaching, legally binding decisions can be taken at EC level.
Det er netop dem, Europa-Parlamentet vil gennemføre.
That is exactly what the European Parliament wants to achieve.
Det skal i drøftelsen med Kommissionen insistere på, at denne gør alvor af sit udsagn om, at den sammen med Parlamentet vil skabe gennembrud i den sociale dimension ved at foreslå retsgrundlag for sine tekster, som gør flertalsafstemning mulig i Rådet, også selv om der findes medlemsstater, som er imod det, og også selv om det således muligvis kommer til en forfatningsstrid.
It must insist during its discussions with the Commission that the latter carries out its promise to achieve a breakthrough in the social dimension together with Parliament by proposing legal bases for its texts that will allow for a majority vote in the Council even if some Member States are opposed, and even if this leads to a constitutional dispute.
Den foreliggende betænkning er vigtig af tre grunde.
The present report is important for three reasons.
For det første fordi vi vil give Kommissionen, der jo foreløbig kives om, hvorvidt det skal være ét forslag til direktiv eller flere direktivforslag, et signal om, at vi mener det alvorligt med, at der skal gives regler for denne arbejdsform.
First, because we wish to give a signal to the Commission, which quibbled at first about a draft directive or directives, that we mean business when it comes to the regulation of this kind of employment.
For det andet er denne betænkning vigtig, og direktivforslaget er vigtigt, fordi vi vil beskytte de svageste arbejdstagere.
Second, this report and the draft directive are important because we wish to protect workers in the weakest position.
For det tredje — og dette ønsker jeg især at understrege — har Udvalget om Kvinders Rettigheder fundet dette direktivforslag yderst vigtigt for de kvindelige arbejdstagere.
Third — and I would give this particular emphasis — the Committee on Women's Rights found this draft directive of special importance for female employees.
Arbejdstagerne med usikre arbejdskontrakter, således som vi for at sige det pænt kalder dem, synes jo først og fremmest at være kvindelige arbejdstagere.
For those who work under insecure statutes, as we so guardedly put it, happen to be, in the first place, women.
Når vi siger, at det i dette direktiv drejer sig om de svageste arbejdstagere, de mest sårbare, de mest usikre, så drejer det sig ikke bare om en anonym gruppe.
When we say that this directive covers the weakest, most vulnerable, most insecure workers, we are not referring to an anonymous group.
Disse arbejdstagere har et navn.
These workers have a name.
Det drejer sig først og fremmest om kvin-
They are in the first place women : cashiers in big stores, women in blue aprons in cleaning firms, mothers who convert the living-room into a workplace, a homeworkplace.
Jeg konstaterer ikke uden tilfredshed, at Kommissionen i går nåede frem til en første beslutning om
VAN VELZEN (S). — (NL) Mr President, before the present proposal for a directive came up for consider ation, a fairly tough discussion took place in the
Hermans nuværende parlamentariske omstændigheder; men tillige må man forstå, at det eneste gode argument imod den parlamentariske initiativret er en aktiv og modig Kommission og et kampklart Ministerråd.
VAN VELZEN and more solid legal point of departure, which on the one hand affords the European Parliament more powers and, on the other, limits the possibilities of individual Member States to block its handling of these matters.
der, kassedamer i supermarkeder, kvinder i blå kitler i rengøringsselskaber, mødre, der laver dagligstuen om til en arbejdsplads, en arbejdsplads i hjemmet.
The question was then asked whether I, as chairman of that committee, ought to have so acted that this proposal in its present form was put on our agenda with, moreover, a requirement that it be dealt with in haste.
Nyere studier viser, at kvindernes deltagelse på arbejdsmarkedet har befæstet den vedvarende kønsadskillelse inden for bestemte erhverv, og at kvindernes problemer på arbejdsmarkedet ikke er løste.
Adoption of the report means in fact that the European Parliament's consultation position is clear and robust and that no doubt, together with the three Commission standpoints, we have a package before us of various elements with which a truly complete proposal can probably be prepared at an early date; at all events, the foundations for a dialogue between Commission and Parliament will have been laid.