natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
III. en afgørelse om indgåelse af aftalen mellem Det Europæiske Økonomiske Fællesskab og Schweiz om direkte forsikring bortset fra livsforsikring (C3188/91 — SYN 220).
I think it is necessary therefore for a Rule change to takeplace, but I accept the Rules Committee interpretation and I support Sir Christopher Prout with respect to Rule 40(2).
Collins (S). — (EN) Fru formand, til forretningsordenen.
PRESIDENT. — (GR) Thank you very much.
Det drejer sig på ingen måde om, at jeg vakler i min loyalitet over for Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse eller nogen afgørelser i dette udvalg.
I would like to give the floor now to Mr Wijsenbeek, who is Vice-Chairman of the Rules Committee, to explain the committee's views, and I cannot allow a more general discussion.
Fru Veils bemærkning lige nu var en absolut skændsel, og jeg håber, hun vil tage den tilbage.
Afterwards I will be asking you to proceed to a vote.
Ikke fordi jeg ønsker at udsætte nogen anden for handling, da jeg nemlig støtter fru Veil i den måde, hvorpå hun har deltaget i kampagnen mod tobak.
If you turn to Rule 40(3) you will see that it says: 'Application of paragraph 2', that is the interpreted paragraph, 'does not preclude a request for referral being tabled by other Members pursuant to Rule 103'.
Det er derfor, jeg beder om redegørelsen, og jeg håber, De vil sætte det under afstemning nu.
If you now turn to Rule 90(l)(d), you will see that it says: 'Finally, voting on the motion for a resolution/ draft legislative resolution as a whole.' So the final vote
Rothley (S), ordforer. — (DE) Fru formand, kære kolleger, det drejer sig om andenbehandlingen af aftalen med Schweiz om direkte forsikring bortset fra livsforsikring.
WIJSENBEEK (LDR). — Mr President, I am in this case speaking not only as Vice-President of the Rules Committee, but also as the draftsman of the opinion of the Rules Committee.
Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender
However, I do not think that the one excludes the
Rothley og Borgernes Rettigheder, som jeg er ordfører for, indstiller til Europa-Parlamentet at godkende hele Rådets fælles holdning.
WIJSENBEEK made by him and since there was a misapplication of the Rules last night, I would ask you, Mr President, to facilitate matters today so that we can have the statement sometime today before Sir Leon leaves Strasbourg.
Under førstebehandlingen nærede vi betænkeligheder med hensyn til det påtænkte blandede udvalgs beføjelser.
other. A referral back to committee according to Rule 40(2) is more specifically a technical referral back, whilst Rule 103 is a general referral back.
Vi fik fra Kommissionen nogle nærmere oplysninger, som medførte, at vi kunne tilslutte os aftalen under førstebehandlingen.
It is however true that under Rule 103 any Member of the House can ask for a referral back, but a referral back under Rule 40(2) is a more specific one which we could see as logically being done by the rapporteur or his commit tee's chairman because it is they who ask the Commissioner for an explanation.
at have besvaret de stillede spørgsmål, så der skaffe des tilstrækkelig klarhed til, at hr. Rothley i aften kunne anbefale vedtagelse.
PRESIDENT. — (GR) Mr Collins, I have listened most attentively to what you said to Parliament, but I do not think this is the moment to enter into a discussion on the interpretation of the Rules of Procedure.
Meget korrekt påpegede han, at hans anbefaling af vedtagelse ikke skal betragtes som udtryk for tilfredshed med behandlingen af spørgsmålet om aftalens retsgrundlag.
You have already proposed amending the agenda once before, although you know that, according to the interpretation of the majority of us, at any rate, you have no right to do so.
Jeg er ham imidlertid taknemmelig for at erkende, at sagen ikke behøver at blive presset igennem i denne sammenhæng, og derfor for at anbefale Parlamentet vedtagelse af aftalen.
On the substance, I would like to inform you that the need to consider the matter has been drawn to the Commission's attention by the presidency, and I hope that Sir Leon Brittan will be making a statement on it.
Jeg synes, at det var nyttigt med denne afklaring, og er glad for at have bragt den.
The Commission will consider it, although I cannot say when; and I see that Mr Bangemann has asked for the floor on the matter.
Der er dog en ændring, som i hvert fald giver anledning til eftertanke.
PRESIDENT. — (GR) Thank you, Mr Wijsenbeek.
Normalt er vi ikke indforstået med, at en forordning eller et direktiv bygger på to retsgrundlag, som indebærer forskellige procedurer, for faktisk forringes Parlamentets position under førstebehandlingen, når artikel 235 tilføjes som retsgrundlag.
One colleague has risen in support of Sir Christopher Prout, and one against, and I will now put the matter to the vote, in accordance with Rule 131(4), which states that, when the Rules Commit tee's interpretation is contested, the matter shall be put to the vote in Parliament, which decides by simple majority.
Der er forskel på, om der er tale om en udtalelse fra Parlamentets side som led i samarbejdsproceduren eller om en høring af Parlamentet, men vi mener ikke, at det er det afgørende punkt.
Let us now vote on Sir Christopher Prout's question concerning a referral back to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure.
Der foreligger imidlertid — det vil jeg gerne endnu en gang gøre Kommissionen opmærksom på — et ret alvorligt institutionelt problem for Parlamentet, som i høj grad kommer til at beskæftige os i en anden forbindelse, når der er tale om aftaler med EFTA-landene om det europæiske økonomiske område eller andre aftaler, nemlig spørgsmålet om Europa-Parlamentets beføjelsers institutionelle klar hed.
BANGEMANN, Vice-President of the Commission. — (DE) Mr President, both Sir Leon and, indeed, the whole of the Commission very much regret that it was not possible to provide the statement yesterday.
Hvad denne aftale med Schweiz angår, kan Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder imidlertid fuldt ud anbefale Parlamentet at godkende Rådets fælles holdning.
It would, however, be possible for Commissioner Matutes to make the statement on Friday.
Jeg gentager min anmodning om at stemme om fru Ewings og hr. Collins' bemærkninger til forretningsordenen.
Are you saying, Mr President, that the Bureau is the master of this House and not the Members who are here and ready to vote ?
Sir Leon Brittan, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (EN) Jeg gør ganske som Parlamentet ønsker og vil med glæde besvare dette spørgsmål.
My second point is that it is in the Minutes that Mrs Veil protested that Members were abusing the Rules.
Samtidig gjordes der imidlertid udtrykkeligt opmærksom på, at den schweiziske aftales indhold ikke måtte forringe Fællesskabets position i forbindelse med dettes forhandlinger med EFTA-landene. dene.
It is quite absurd that a matter which is so important to Scotland be postponed until Friday when the Com missioner who has the technical knowledge and who was here all yesterday ready to make the statement, will not be there.
Formanden. — De fik ordet til Rothley-betænknin-gen og ikke til forretningsordenen.
Fobbing us off with a Commissioner who does not have that technical knowledge is clearly telling us that it is a matter of no relevance to this House.
Afstemningen finder sted onsdag kl. 17.
Therefore, the Rules were broken over and over again last night.
Collins (S). — (EN) Fru formand, til forretningsordenen.
COLLINS (S). — Mr President, I refer to pages 30 and 31 of yesterday's Minutes.
Jeg går ud fra, at vi skal til at gå videre, og at vi er færdige med hr. Wijsenbeeks afledningstaktik. Der står i artikel 105, at et medlem før eller under forhandlingen om et bestemt punkt på dagsordenen
As a result of my moving this, Mr Pimenta, with the backing of more than 13 Members, asked for a quorum check.
Vernier (RDE), ordforer. — (FR) Fru formand, kære kolleger, vi skal i aften beskæftige os med to ting. For det første forbedring af tobaksvarers mærkning og for det andet forbud mod våd snus.
VERNIER (RDE). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I should like very simply and very briefly to confirm what Mr Pimenta said : there was no breach of the Rules of Procedure yesterday.
kan stille forslag om, at forhandlingen udsættes til et nærmere angivet tidspunkt.
Contrary to what Mr Collins said, it is indeed legitimate to call a quorum on a procedural vote!
Jeg foreslår derfor, at hr. Verniers og hr. Bombards betænkning udsættes, så vi kan gå over til dagsordenspunktet om stålindustrien, der sorterer under Sir Leon Brittan.
The proof of this is that it is simply mentioned that, in the case of procedural motions, only one sentence of Rule 89 shall not apply ; which means, a contrario, that on a request to ascertain whether a quorum is present in the case of procedural motions, all the rest of Rule 89 shall apply.
Jeg gør opmærksom på, at De i henhold til artikel 105 skal sætte et sådant forslag under afstemning.
We called a quorum ; everything was complied with, including the Rules of Procedure.
Formanden. — Hr. Collins, Deres forslag er fuldt ud antageligt, men vi må tage betænkningerne i rækkefølge.
VON DER VRING (S). — (DE) Mr President, we have allowed a practice to creep in whereby several debates take place during the week in which colleagues get to their feet clutching the Rules of Procedure and make speeches about how they or somebody else could interpret the whole thing.
Hvis De derfor ønsker artikel 105 anvendt, må vi begynde med at bruge den på Vernierbetænkningen, hvorefter De så kan kræve samme fremgangsmåde for Bombard-betænkningen.
We have a President of Parliament to interpret the Rules of Procedure as well as a Committee on the Rules of Procedure, and I would therefore ask that the President cease to allow such speeches in the future.
Hvad angår forbuddet mod våd snustobak, vil jeg sige lidt mere.
So nothing I say represents opposition to discussion of the important problem of the closure of the British Steel works in Scotland.
For det første, at forbuddet af tre årsager forekommer mig i høj grad berettiget.
I should like this to be clear both in the minutes and the verbatim report.
Pimenta (LDR). — (FR) Fru formand, De har modtaget en af tretten medlemmer underskrevet anmodning om at få fastslået Parlamentets beslutningsdygtighed. ningsdygtighed.
However, in terms of procedure I must disagree with the interpretation and statements made by Mr Kenneth Collins and Mrs Ewing.
(Det fastsloges, at Parlamentet ikke var beslutningsdygtigt) dygtigt)
In fact the President acted correctly yesterday and there was no irregular pro cedure.
For det første fordi det er bevist, at snus kan være årsag til cancer. Beviset leveredes af det internatio nale cancerforskningsinstitut i Lyon i 1985, af National Institute of Health i 1986, af US Surgeon General i 1986 og af Verdenssundhedsorganisationen i 1988.
And this is the paragraph at which Mr Kenneth Collins is clutching in contesting the procedure of the President-in-the-Chair yesterday.
Alle disse undersøgelser viser, at tobak til oral anvendelse indeholder tre stærkt cancerfremkaldende stoffer: Polonium 210, polycykliske aromatiske carbonhydrider og nitrosaminer.
It makes no sense to place on the agenda of the next sitting a vote on a procedural question, particularly an adjournment or a change in the order of proceedings.
Hvad nitrosaminerne angår, er de mængder, der findes i våd snus, ca. 2 000 gange større end de mængder, der tillades i levnedsmidler.
On the contrary, in Rule 103 it is quite clear what the spirit of the Rules of Procedure is when it says : 'The vote shall be taken immediately on the request for referral back to committee.
Collins (S). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg er ked af, at folk er blevet så smålige, men jeg vil alligevel påberåbe mig artikel 105 for at skabe sikkerhed for, at erklæringen afgives af Sir Leon, da det er vigtigt, at det gøres af ham og ingen anden.
(If a check on the quorum has been requested and the quorum is not present, the provisions of Rule 89(3) final sentence shall not apply and Parliament shall proceed with the debate)'.
For det tredje fordi forbruget af våd snus, der beklageligvis i de senere år har udviklet sig i De Forenede Stater og Sverige, heldigvis endnu ikke har vundet indpas i Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
Naturally I would not take issue with what you have said, because it relates to matters on which I would very much like to agree.
Ewing (ARC). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg er ikke uenig i hr. Collins forslag, men må jeg foreslå, at der, dersom det vedtages, må blive adgang til at fremsætte beslutningsforslag, og at der gennemføres en afstemning, for ellers bliver det en rent teoretisk forhandling.
BANGEMANN, Vice-President of the Commission. — (DE) Mr President, I should really have expected you to correct what Mr McMahon said.
Formanden. — Med Deres tilladelse vil jeg foreslå, at Kommissionens svar udsættes til i morgen.
If a Commissioner makes a statement in this House — even if it does not relate to his immediate area of responsibility — heis not being a ventriloquist's dummy.
I morgen kan enten formanden selv eller mødeformanden give Dem et præcist svar.
We then expect to be treated with at least the bare minimum of courtesy.
Nu er det nemt, men snart vil det være for sent: Markedet, vanerne og afhængigheden vil være skabt.
McMAHON (S). — Mr President, if you look at Rule 74(2), what Mr Collins is suggesting is perfectly acceptable.
Jeg tilføjer, at forbuddet mod våd snus ikke skal gælde for de gammelkendte skrå- og snustyper, hvilket udtrykkeligt står i mit ændringsforslag nr. 18.
Once adopted the agenda should not be amended, except in application of Rules 75, 102, 105 and 106, or on a proposal from the President.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok.
We do not want the ventriloquist's dummy, we want the ventriloquist on this issue of steel.
A3-106/91) af Vernier for Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse om forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet (KOM(90) 538 endel. dok.
There are technical and political reasons why Sir Leon Brittan should be answerable to this House and to the European electorate for this decision. To give him his due, he was prepared last night to stand up and defend himself, and I would like to see him doing that.
C3-42/91 — SYN 314) til direktiv om ændring af direktiv 89/622/EØF om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlems staternes love og administrative bestemmelser om mærkning af tobaksvarer.
I think it is important because, as Mr Collins said, over 1,000 jobs in his constituency are at stake, and I have about 80 to 100 constituents who work at the Hunterston terminal whose jobs will be affected when Ravenscraig closes.
Uheldigvis er dette forbud mod våd snus, som dog ellers er såre berettiget, ikke efter alles hoved.
PRESIDENT. — (GR) Thank you very much, Mr Vice-President.
Det havde været noget mere til alles fordel, hvis han rent faktisk havde gjort sig den ulejlighed at komme og høre, hvad vi havde at sige om det. Jeg fandt det virkelig upassende og uklogt af ham at være så selvsikker med hensyn til noget, som han klart ikke ved noget om. Vi i Retsudvalget er meget optaget af, at Parlamentet ikke giver sin tilslutning til forslag med retsgrundlag, som enten er forkerte eller ultra vires.
Decision on urgency to take account of the feelings of those colleagues who wish to have a more extensive debate with the Commissioners responsible, who have more knowledge and can therefore discuss matters in greater depth.
For intet af de af mig omtalte farlige stoffer medfører hvert år 430 000 dødsfald inden for EF, hvilket er det officielle tal, som fru Papandreou oplyste den 12. marts i år som svar på en skriftlig forespørgsel.
C3-178/91) for a regulation on the EC-International investment partners' financial facility for Latin America, Asia and the Mediterranean
Jeg kan ikke sige til Parlamentet, at det, Parlamentet foreslår at gøre i forbindelse med denne betænkning, på nogen måde vil være ultra vires.
JACKSON, Christopher (ED). — Mr President, the Committee on Development and Cooperation has had the opportunity to discuss this request for urgency.
Det er derfor, Retsudvalget anser det for at være så vigtigt, at vi får nok tid til at udarbejde en grundig, gennemtænkt udtalelse om de pågældende retlige spørgsmål til bedste for alle medlemmerne af Parlamentet, som jo har ret til det i henhold til artikel 36.
It agreed that it was necessary for Parliament to give its opinion during this partsession, not only so that the Council can act this month before the existing trial period for the ECIIP finishes, but also in order to keep up pressure on the Council of Ministers.
(Bifald)
(Parliament agreed to urgent procedure)
Vernier (RDE). — (FR) Fru formand, jeg vil blot sige til Lord Inglewood, at jeg beklager, at han ikke hørte, hvad jeg sagde, for samme retsgrundlag er allerede benyttet til at forbyde mange farlige stoffer.
CORNELISSEN (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, I drew your attention yesterday to the serious delays suffered by the Monday afternoon flight from Brussels to Strasbourg. For the last three part-sessions the delays have been two, three and three and a quarter hours respectively.
Det burde han vide; f.eks.
I have trouble understanding this reluctance to act.
Endvidere vil jeg sige til ham, idet jeg vender tilbage til hans erklæring i »regnbuen« af 14. maj, at han selv har sagt, at han ville udsætte forhandlingen til mandag den 10. juni.
So I ask you once again whether you will contact Air France on this matter which is crucial to our ability to function properly.
Lord Inglewood (ED), ordfører for udtalelsen fra Retsudvalget. — (EN) Fru formand, jeg taler som ordfører for Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder om retsgrundlaget for dette forslag.
Proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(91) 75 final — Doc.
Vi har brugt mange timer på at drøfte det og er ikke kommet til nogen konklusion.
C3-191/91) for a regulation laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Com munity from third countries
Jeg har således ikke nogen udtalelse at forelægge Parlamentet, da udvalget ikke har vedtaget nogen.
PRESIDENT. — (GR) Mr Cornelissen, I fully share your concern, but because of the limited time available, I would advise you to put your question at some time other than during the Assembly's sitting.
Arbejdet er stadig i gang.
You can perfectly well ask it in the President's Office or in some other office, without involving the Assembly.
Indtil da havde Retsudvalget to møder, hvorunder udvalget havde rig lejlighed til at udtale sig om det ændringsforslag, der skulle ændre retsgrundlaget.
COLINO SALAMANCA (S), Chairman of the Com mittee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Develop ment. — (ES) Mr President, the Committee on Agriculture was originally against the request for urgency for this proposal for a regulation.
Det gjorde Retsudvalget imidlertid ikke, og Parlamentets plenarforsamling skal ikke vente på, at det på et eller andet tidspunkt måtte behage Retsudvalget af afslutte sine overvejelser.
However, since the rapporteur has been able to do some further work on it and since we have summoned the Committee on Agriculture for this morning, I would ask the Assembly to vote in favour of the request for urgency.
Formanden. — Forhandlingen genoptages i morgen som sidste punkt på dagsordenen. ')
LANDA MENDIBE (NI). — (ES) Mr President, I too should like to speak about the minutes.
Lad det være nok at sige, at Kommissionens forslag, for ikke at nævne visse ændringsforslag, virkelig giver anledning til bekymring.
There is an omission of something which I think ought to appear in the minutes and which I hope to rectify.
Men fordi der stadig er en række uløste spørgsmål, trods disse vidtgående drøftelser, kan jeg ikke sige mere.
This GAL state terrorism in the Basque Country has already murdered some 30 ...
(Modet hævet kl.
Proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(91) 172 final — Doc.
Jeg hørte det, hr. Vernier tidligere på dagen havde at sige om Retsudvalget, nemlig vaklende, og nu beskrives vi som værende i lommen på tobaksindu
Basques, including refugees and civilians and I regret that yesterday honourable Members forgot this ...
Dagsorden for næste mode: se protokollen.
(The President interrupted the speaker)
Medicinske lægemidler — Betænkninger (dok.
Medicinal products
A3­114/91) og (dok.
— Report (Doc.
A3­126/91) af Ceci, (dok. A3­127/91) af Schleicher
A3-148/91) by Mr Valverde López, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for:
Energi og miljø — Betænkninger (dok. A3­130/91) afVohrer, (dok.
I. A regulation laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (COM(90) 283 final — Doc. C3-403/91 — SYN 309);
Luftforurening forårsaget af emissioner fra motorkøretøjer — Indstilling ved andenbe­handling (dok.
A directive amending Directives 65/EEC, 75/ 318/EEC and 75/319/EEC in respect of veterinary medicinal products (COM(90) 283 final — Doc. C3-404/90 — SYN 310) ;
Homøopatiske lægemidler — Betænkning (dok.
A directive amending Directives 81/851/EEC and 81/852/EEC in respect of veterinary medicinal products (COM(90) 283 final — Doc. C3405/90 —SYN 311);
B3­842/91) af Speciale, (dok.
— Report (Doc.
B3­911/91) af de la Malene og betænkning (dok.
A3-113/91) by Mrs Ceci, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 607 final — Doc.
A3­140/91) af Tongue
C348/90 — SYN 229) for a directive on the
(Mødet åbnet kl. 9.00) til artikel 103.« Hvis De går til artikel 103, stk. 5, så står der: »Der kan ligeledes fremsættes anmodning om henvisning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling i over ensstemmelse med artikel 103 under afstemningerne om en del af teksten, for så vidt formanden ikke har sat den samlede tekst under afstemning i overens stemmelse med artikel 90, stk. 1, litra d«.
A3-126/91) by Mrs Ceci, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 607 final — Doc. C350/90 — SYN 231) for a directive on the labelling of medicinal products for human use and on package leaflets.
Formanden. — Protokollen for mødet i går er omdelt.
— Report (Doc.
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg den som godkendt.
C3185/90 — SYN 273) for a directive on advertising of medicinal products for human use.
Hvis De så går til artikel 90, stk. 1, litra d, vil De se, at der står: »Afstemning om det samlede beslutningsforslag/forslag til lovgivningsmæssig beslutning (endelig afstemning)«.
As regards the machinery for adopting binding Community decisions in which the agency is involved, according to the new procedures envisaged, it is provided that it will be the Commission, assisted by a regulatory committee, which will adopt the final decisions.
Så den endelige afstemning, som artikel 103 henviser til, er afstemningen om lovgivningsmæssig beslutning.
In fact this proposal actually means that it is the Council and not the Commission, in extreme cases, which will have the last word and may block certain decisions.
Det er derfor min opfattelse ud fra en klar udlægning af beslutninger truffet af Udvalget for Forretningsordenen vedrørende artikel 103, at den foreslåede fortolkning af artikel 40, stk. 2, som er blevet forelagt forsamlingen, ikke er korrekt.
We have therefore proposed in an amend ment that Procedure III — the procedure providing for a regulatory committee — be replaced by Procedure I — that of a consultative committee — which is Par liament's official position.
Sir Christopher Prout (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, vedrørende side 14, punkt 9 i den engelske udgave af protokollen.
In general I agree with the Commission's proposals, although I think certain relevant aspects should be specified in order to provide a better guarantee of citizens' rights as regards, in particular, legal security, objectivity and procedural economy.