natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
B3-1864/91) af Ernst de la Graete og Telkåmper, (dok. B3-1872/91) af Vandemeulebroucke m.fl., (dok. B3-1874/91) af Dury m.fl.
B3-1864/91) by Mrs Ernst de la Graete and Mr Telkämper, (Doc.
A3-296/91) af Valverde López
B3-1847/91) by Mr de la Malène and others, (Doc.
B3-1843/91 ) af Bertens, (dok. B3-1847/91) af de la Malene m.fl., (dok. B3-1854/91) afOoo- men-Ruijten m.fl., (dok. B3-1867/91) af Aulas m.fl., (dok. B3-1869/91) af Wurtz m.fl., (dok.
B3-1867I 91) by Mrs Aulas and others, (Doc.
B3-1873/91) af Sakellariou og Dury
A3-296/91) by Mr Valverde
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
A3-294I 91) by Mr Ortiz Climent, (Doc.
Europæisk skibsbygning A3-278/91) af Speciale
European shipbuilding — Report (Doc. A3278/91) by Mr Speciale
Menneskerettigheder og udviklingspolitik -Mundtlig forespørgsel (dok.
Human rights and development policy — Oral question (Doc.
B31694/91) af Såby
B3-1694/91) by Mr Saby
(Mødet åbnet kl. 10.00)
Vice-President (The sitting was opened at 10 a.m.)
Så vidt jeg er orienteret, er der ikke givet noget svar herpå, hvilket efter min mening er en yderst alvorlig sag. Parlamenter fra en række medlemsstater, heriblandt fra mit land, har allerede truffet forberedelser til at sende delegationer til Jugoslavien for at orientere sig om situationen.
I think that he must very much feel that his evening's work was a complete waste of time as so many questions had been tabled for answer by him which were not within his area of competence.
I betragtning af sagens alvor er det yderst vigtigt, at Præsidiet ufortøvet undersøger anmodningen fra formanden for Det Politiske Udvalg.
It means that Members wait here for their question when they see it listed only to be told that it is not within his competence to answer it.
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg den som godkendt.
So could you please ask the services to investigate this and, if necessary, we might need to have some of our democratic rights slightly withdrawn simply to save time.
Christopher Jackson (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, et par kommentarer til del I, punkt 9, i protokollen, hvor der i forbindelse med punktet opsigelse af samarbejdsaftalen med Jugoslavien står, at »ordføreren insisterede på, at hans betænkning« — for det første var ordføreren fru Cassanmagnago Cerretti, og det vil derfor være logisk at ændre hans til hendes — »blev sat under afstemning allerede samme dag«.
JACKSON, Christopher (ED). — Mr President, I have a couple of comments on page 9 of the Minutes where it refers to the debate on Yugoslavia. It says 'the rapporteur insisted that his report' — well first of all as it was Mrs Cassanmagnago Cerretti, they may like to get the his changed to her— 'should be voted that day'.
Til sidst under dette punkt står der: »Afstemning: onsdag kl. 18.30«.
At the end it says that the vote was for 6.30 p.m. that evening.
Dette er indlysende nok ukorrekt, eftersom afstemningen finder sted i aften.
It is obviously incorrect because the vote is going to be this evening.
Desuden står der, at ordføreren anmodede om oplysninger vedrørende de parlamentariske delegationers rolle og
It also goes on to say the rapporteur requested information on the role and responsibilities of the parliamentary delegation.
Han må have følt det som rent tidsspilde at skulle være til stede her i aftes, eftersom så mange af de indgivne spørgsmål til Rådet ikke henhørte under denne institutions kom petenceområde.
Mrs Cassanmagnago Cerretti was referring to the request that she had made to the President for a delegation from the Political Affairs Committee to go to Yugoslavia.
Jeg anmoder Dem om at drage omsorg for, at Parlamentets tjenestegrene og ikke mindst Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet behandler problemet vedrørende det forhold, at der så ofte opføres spørgsmål til Rådet, som ikke henhører under dettes kompetenceområde. Det betyder, at de
So far as I am aware no response has been made to that and I would like to say that I think this is an extremely serious matter, as we know that parliaments from other
Formanden. — Jeg tager Deres bemærkning ad notam.
Debates of the European Parliament
Som medforfatter til Økonomiudvalgets kom promisforslag, der udgør grundlaget for det, som Parlamentet i går vedtog med stort flertal, kan jeg sige, at der er begået en fejl, idet ordet »kun« ikke skulle udgå.
No 3-411/281 their arguments prevail, thanks to this mistake, may say.
Formanden. — Tre medlemmer har nu anmodet om ordet for en kommentar til Deres indlæg. Jeg kan ikke tillade en debat herom på dette tidspunkt.
PRESIDENT. — Three, no, four colleagues now wish to speak on the point you have made.
Vi har kun tre timer til rådighed for aktuel og uopsættelig debat.
We only have three hours for the topical and urgent debate.
Jeg mener, at hr. Alber klart lod gen nemføre en afstemning, der tog højde for proble merne med det lille ord »kun«. Hvis der alligevel skulle være problemer, må de naturligvis behandles.
I think the voting chaired by Mr Alber was quite clear, but if there are problems with the word 'only', then obviously they must be cleared up.
Dette kan ske før afstemningstiden i aften.
But I think this can wait until tonight before voting time.
Det er ikke rigtigt; hvad jeg sagde her i går aftes, var, at spørgsmålene fra nr. 48 til nogen og halvtreds, stillet til Rådet, var blevet placeret på listen foran andre, som var blevet indgivet tidligere. Og jeg synes ikke, at denne fremgangsmåde er korrekt.
This is inaccurate. What I said in the House last night was that questions 48 to 50, or so, put to the Council, had been grouped together at the expense of other questions which had been tabled before them.
Endvidere er det på side 34 i protokollen ikke anført, at jeg ligeledes ved afslutningen af forhandlingerne protesterede over, at spørgsmålene til Kommissionen også blev taget op i en anden rækkefølge end den, hvori de var blevet indgivet til plenarforsamlingen.
Furthermore, on page 30 of the Minutes it is not recorded that Mr Suárez also complained, at the end of the sitting, at the fact that the order in which questions were put to the Commission did not correspond to the order in which they had been tabled in Parliament.
Jeg ønskede, at det skulle anføres i protokollen, at spørgsmål nr. 83 og 90 var indgivet senere end mange andre, som ikke nåede at blive besvaret, og jeg mener, at den, der udarbejder listen over spørgsmål, skal følge et eller andet kriterium og ikke helt vilkårligt bestemme, hvilke medlemmer der skal have ret til at stille spørgsmål.
I wanted the Minutes to record the fact that questions 83 and 90 had been tabled after many other questions which did not receive an answer. I believe that whoever draws up the list for Question Time should follow some sort of guidelines and not decide arbitrarily which Members will be allowed to put a question.
Formanden. — Jeg tager Deres bemærkning ad notam, og problemet vil blive undersøgt.
PRESIDENT. — Your point has been noted and will be followed up.
von der Vring (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, i forbindelse med opsigelse af samarbejdsaftalen med Jugoslavien på side 21 i protokollen hedder det, at Parlamentet vedtog afgørelsen.
VON DER VRING (S). — (DE) Mr President, on page 29 of Part II of the Minutes, denunciation of the cooperation agreement between the EEC and Yugoslavia, it is stated that Parliament gives its assent to that denunciation.
Af en pressemeddelelse fremgår det, at afgørelsen om opsigelsen af denne aftale er offentliggjort i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende den 15. november.
I read in yesterday's VWD press report that the denunciation of the cooperation agreement by the Community was published in the Official Journal of 15 November.
Jeg anmoder Dem om at undersøge, om der er tale om en fejl, eller det drejer sig om en ny fremgangsmåde.
Could you check whether this is a mistake or whether it signals a new custom ?
Kan De give tilsagn om, at Parlamentet bliver informeret herom?
Can you ensure that the House is informed of this ?
Måske har kommissær Dondelinger noget at sige hertil.
Perhaps Commissioner Dondelinger can say a few words on the matter.
Formanden. — Jeg tager Deres udtalelse ad notam, hr. von der Vring, og spørgsmålet vil blive undersøgt.
CRAWLEY (S). — Mr President, had several points of order been taken at 6.30 those points of order would have been in this morning's minutes, but as they are not it is important that this House hears the news that was meant to be given to it yesterday in points of order.
Falconer (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, angående fru Ewings spørgsmål om transporten af radioaktivt materiale til Dounreay på side 14.
FALCONER (S). — Mr President, I refer you to page 12 of the Minutes and Mrs Ewing's question on the transport of waste to Dounreay.
Fru Ewing forsøgte at gøre opmærksom på et relevant problem, men formanden, hr. Alber, afbrød hende og afviste, som fru Crawley har været inde på, at give ordet til alle andre medlemmer, der ønskede at fremsætte bemærkninger til forretningsordenen.
Mrs Ewing was trying to make a valid point on which the President, Mr Alber cut her off and refused any further points of order, which Mrs Crawley has already referred to.
Der er efter min opfattelse tale om misbrug af formandens beføjelser, og hvis indlæggene til forretningsordenen ikke
I feel this was an abuse of the Rules in so far as the President's privileges are concerned and if the points of order had been taken properly then obviously the matter would have been dealt with at the meeting last night.
Der er forlydender om, at Rådets nederlandske formandskab har til hensigt at begrænse rækkevidden af EØF-Traktatens artikel 119, der som bekendt handler om ligeløn for mænd og kvinder, en bestemmelse, der har været indeholdt i Traktaterne siden Fællesskabets grundlæggelse.
News has reached this Parliament that the Dutch Presidency is discussing the weakening of Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome. This, as Members will know, is the Article which talks about equal pay between men and women and has been enshrined in the Treaties since the Community was founded.
Såfremt der i Rådet føres drøftelser om at ændre, nedbryde, ødelægge eller begrænse rækkevidden af artikel 119 eller gøre noget som helst andet ved denne artikel end at udvide rækkevidden af den, bør Parlamentet under rettes herom.
If there is any discussion going on in the Council on amending, dismantling, demolishing, destroying, weakening or doing anything to Article 119 other than expanding it, then this House should know.
For millionvis af kvinder har lønnen i løbet af de sidste 35 år været afhængig af det i Rom-Traktatens artikel 119 nedfældede princip, og Europas kvinder vil gå på barrikaderne for denne artikel; vi vil ikke have den svækket!
There are millions of women whose pay over the last 35 years has depended on the guiding principle of Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome and the women of Europe will go to the barricades over this article : we will not have it weakened !
Formanden. — Jeg fratager Dem ordet, da vi ikke kan åbne en debat om enkelte emner.
HERMAN (PPE). — (FR) Mr President, when the Caudron report was voted on yesterday a mistake was clearly made.
var blevet afvist, ville denne sag uden tvivl være blevet behandlet på mødet i aftes.
In the haste with which the President, Mr Alber, conducted the vote, the word 'only' was deleted.
Afvisningen resulterede desuden i, at den samlede ARC-Gruppe for lod mødesalen, hvilket kunne have bragt nogle af afstemningerne i fare.
As one of the co-authors of the Economic Committee's compromise, which forms the basis on which Parliament voted by a large majority yesterday, I am in a position to say that a mistake was made : the word 'only' should not have been deleted.
Mere generelt har jeg anmodet om, at der nedsættes et udvalg med den opgave at gøre status over kommunismens forbryderiske handlinger. Kommunisme dræber rent faktisk altid.
This issue has been the subject of much debate; yesterday the vote was taken and the voting list of our group and the Socialist Group leaves no doubt about the organization of the vote.
For det andet, hr. formand, anmoder jeg om, at man holder op med at bruge ordet Jugoslavien her i salen.
There was clearly a misunderstanding, caused by the speed with which the vote was taken.
Jugoslavien findes ikke, det er udelukkende et offer for en undertrykkende, nazistisk, tyrannisk og blodig regering. Der findes kun Kroatien, Slovenien osv...
In any event, the Commission should know that the real wishes of Parliament are not reflected in the text which appears in the Minutes, whatever Members who are now seeing
Vedrørende Dounreay-problemet, der efter min mening blev håndteret ukorrekt i mandags, da vi kun havde et minut til at stille spørgsmål til kom missæren, anmoder jeg Dem om, hr. formand, at anmode denne om at afgive redegørelse om de seneste oplysninger, der er kommet medlemmerne for øre, nemlig at der er planlagt en yderligere transport af radioaktivt materiale til Dounreay fra Braunschweig i Tyskland.
On the question of Dounreay, which I believe was mishandled on Monday when we only had one minute to put the question to the Commissioner, could I ask you, Mr President, if the Commissioner would oblige us by making a statement on the latest information which has become available to Members that a further transport of nuclear waste to Dounreay is due from Braunschweig in Germany.
Jeg tillader mig desuden at foreslå, at kommissæren under sin redegørelse svarer på hr. Linkohrs spørgsmål om, hvordan beriget uranium-affald skal behandles i Fællesskabet.
Could I also suggest that the Commissioner, when he makes that statement, may want to answer Rolf Linkohr's question on how spent enriched uranium fuel is to be treated within the Community ?
I henhold til kommissærens eget svar er der kun to steder, hvor beriget uranium-affald kan behandles, nemlig i Dounreay og et sted i Frankrig.
Given the Commissioner's own answer, there are only two places where this enriched uranium fuel can be treated : one at Dounreay and one in France.
Dette er et alvorligt problem, som Parlamentet efter min mening må forholde sig til.
I believe this is a serious problem which this House has to address.
Parlamentet har tidligere vedtaget lovgivningsmæssige beslutninger om transport af affald, giftigt affald og radioaktivt affald, gående ud på, at dette skal deponeres så tæt som muligt på oprindelsesstedet.
This House has already passed legislation on the transport of waste, toxic and nuclear, which should be disposed of as close as possible to its place of origin.
Min fornemmelse er, at der i dette tilfælde er tale om en parodi på retsprincipperne.
I feel that there is a travesty of justice in this matter.
Jeg anmoder Parlamentet og Dem, hr. formand, om at anmode Kommissionen om en kort redegørelse, så der kan komme flere facts på bordet vedrørende den aktuelle situation i forbindelse med transporten af radioaktivt affald.
I would ask the House and you, Mr President, to ask the
Jeg skal blot meddele, at jeg støtter hr. Hermans indlæg.
Debates of the European Parliament
Det er ikke blot et rygte, at den nederlandske regering vil ændre artikel 119 i EØF-Traktaten, og at den også har fremført dette ønske i Rådet, selv om det hidtil kun har været på uformelt plan.
FALCONER many Members did not realize how they were voting on this amendment.
Jeg anmoder Dem om at tage ad notam, at jeg ønsker at ændre min egen stemmeafgivelse, idet jeg ved afstemningen stemte imod, medens jeg reelt ønskede at stemme for.
Commission if it could make a brief statement so that we can find out more facts about the current situation regarding the transport of nuclear waste.
Caudron (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, to bemærkninger til protokollen.
CAUDRON (S). — (FR) Mr President, I have two remarks to make concerning the Minutes.
For det første gør jeg opmærksom på en fejl i forbindelse med hr. Cassidy s ændringsforslag til artikel 6.
First, what I said regarding Mr Cassidy's amendment to Article 6 has been misinterpreted.
Jeg sagde højt og tydeligt, at jeg kunne tilslutte mig, at andet led betragtedes som en tilføjelse, men at jeg ikke kunne tilslutte mig første led.
I said, quite clearly, that I agreed to the inclusion of the second paragraph, as an addition, but not to the inclusion of the first paragraph.
Lydbåndet fra mødet kan bekræfte dette.
The tapes will confirm this.
I protokollen er første led imidlertid også medtaget, medens det kun var andet led, der blev vedtaget.
However, in the Minutes, the first paragraph has been included, although only the second was adopted.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
I should like to explain what is behind all this.
Caudron myndigheder opmærksom herpå, således at havne myndighederne i Dunkerque kan få besked om ikke at tillade denne transport.
The Dutch Government and a number of other governments in the Member States think that the Barber judgment will cost private pension funds so much money that in future we women must not be treated in the same way as men, because it is too expensive.
Napoletano (GUE). — (IT) Jeg vil blot sige, at med hensyn til spørgsmålet om artikel 119 i Traktaten vil det være af stor betydning, hvis Parlamentets for mand ville tage stilling og fremsætte en erklæring. Jeg vil derfor bede ham overbringe denne anmodning til hr. Barón Crespo.
I would point out, however, that neither this Parliament nor the Commission can agree with this, and I would call on the Commission to intervene with the Dutch presidency.
Min anden kommentar — og stadig uden at ville genåbne debatten — drejer sig netop om ændrings forslag nr. 9 til artikel 2, stk. 1.
The second remark that I should like to make, while not wishing to reopen the debate, concerns Amendment 9 to Article 2(1).
En halv snes medlemmer har i formiddags gjort mig opmærksom på, at de ikke ønskede at stemme imod udeladelsen af ordet »kun«.
A number of Members have told me this morning that it was not their intention to vote against the word 'only'.
Der herskede stor forvirring i for bindelse med afstemningen.
There was confusion when the vote was taken.
Det gjorde jeg i øvrigt selv opmærksom på i forbindelse med afstemningen, men formanden gik meget hurtigt videre.
I pointed this out at the time, but the President pushed on with the voting.
De stemmer, der ved afstemningen ved navn blev talt med som stemmer imod ordet »kun«, må derfor trækkes fra for de medlemmers vedkommende, der rent faktisk er for.
It should be established how many Members were counted as being against the word 'only', at the time of the roll-call vote, when in fact they were in favour of it.
Det er det samme, som fru Fontaine netop har gjort opmærksom på.
Mrs Fontaine has just said this.
Andre medlemmer, f.eks. hr. Zeiler, har ligeledes gjort mig opmærksom herpå.
And other Members, such as Mr Zeiler, have told me the same thing.
Efter min mening må der hermed sættes spørgsmålstegn ved afstemningen. Jeg agter i øvrigt at henvise spørgsmålet til Det Udvidede Præsidium. dium.
I believe that this calls into question the validity of the vote and I shall be referring this matter to the enlarged Bureau.
Hoppenstedt (PPE). — (DE) Jeg nåede ikke at få ordet i forbindelse med Caudronbetænkningen og ordet »kun«. Hr. Alber befinder sig nu i salen.
PRESIDENT. — I am afraid I must interrupt you because we cannot have another debate on the various specific topics now.
Formanden. — Jeg lukker nu talerlisten for indlæg til protokollen.
PRESIDENT. — I shall not take any more points on the Minutes.
Med hensyn til Caudron-afstemningen har jeg allerede sagt, at dette spørgsmål vil blive taget op i løbet af dagen på grundlag af lydbåndet fra afstemningen, så at der kan foreligge et resultat i aften.
As regards the vote on the Caudron report, I have already said that we will check this matter during the day by means of the tapes and present the findings tonight.
Alber (PPE). — (DE) Hr. formand, der var indgivet anmodning om særskilt afstemning om ordet »kun«.
ANTONY (DR). — (FR) Mr President, I put a question to the Commission concerning the author of a crime against humanity, Mr Boudarel, who is in France under the protection of the Ministry of Education.
I teksten stod der, at kun HD-MAC-standarden kan finde anvendelse.
And more generally, I called for a committee to be set up to draw up a report on all crimes committed under communism.
Visse medlemmer ønskede, at ordet »kun« udgik.
Communism is a killer.
Når der afholdes særskilt afstem ning om et ord, burde det være relativt enkelt og problemløst. De, der er for ordet »kun«, skal stemme »ja«, hvilket de også gjorde.
The Commission replied that it had no responsibility on such matters.
De, der ønskede ordet »kun« udeladt, stemte »nej«.
There is Croatia, Slovenia, there is ...
Flertal let var af den opfattelse, at ordet »kun« skulle udelades.
(The President cut off the speaker)
Llewellyn Smith (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, under henvisning til side 14 i protokollen vil jeg i lighed med hr. Falconer rejse spørgsmålet om formandens adfærd i forbindelse med fru Ewings ønske om at fremsætte en bemærkning til forretningsordenen om de nye oplysninger vedrørende planerne om en yder ligere transport af radioaktivt affald fra Tyskland til Dounreay.
SMITH, Llewellyn (S). — Mr President, I refer you to page 12 of the Minutes and like Mr Falconer raise the issue of the behaviour of the President in relation to the attempt by Mrs Ewing to raise a point of order on the news that more spent nuclear fuel was going from Germany to Dounreay.
Fru Ewing havde på forhånd fået for mandskabets tilladelse til at tage dette spørgsmål op.
Prior to that attempt, Mrs Ewing had got the permission of the chair to raise the point on this very issue.
At hun næsten med det samme blev frataget ordet, er efter min mening et af de mest oplagte eksempler på misbrug af formandskabets beføjelser i de syv et halvt år, jeg har været medlem af Parlamentet.
The fact that she was ruled out of order almost immediately was to me one of the most blatant abuses of the powers of this chair in the seven and a half years in which I have been in this House.
Det er vigtigt, at der opføres en forhandling om det spørgsmål, som fru Ewing ønskede at rejse, på dagsordenen for december-mødeperioden, så at folk...
I think it is important that the point which Mrs Ewing wished to make — that there be a debate on this subject in the December plenary — actually be put and people...
Rent faktisk er det omvendt.
PRESIDENT. — We are discussing the Minutes.
Hermed ønsker jeg blot at gøre det klart, at begge fodnoter skal medtages i ændringsforslaget. get.
I will not take any further points unless they relate to the Minutes.
Formanden. — Hr. Smith, jeg må desværre fratage Dem ordet, eftersom hr. Falconer allerede har sagt det samme.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Smith, I am sorry but I must interrupt you because Mr Falconer has already said the same thing.
Staes (V). — (NL) Hr. formand, i forbindelse med protokollen vil jeg føje endnu et element til det foregående indlæg.
STAES (V). — (NL) Mr President, I should like to add something to the Minutes.
I aften afgår der en transport fra havnen i Dunkerque med British Nuclear Fuels med kerneaffald fra Irak til Dover.
This evening, another British Nuclear Fuels shipment is leaving the port of Dunkirk with nuclear waste from Iraq, bound for Dover.
Jeg henstiller til Kommissionen og Parlamentet om udtrykkeligt at gøre de franske
In the past, Parliament has made its position clear in
Patterson ningen og offentliggørelsen af resultatet heraf i pro tokollen.
(Applause) connection with the accident that occurred with the Herald of Free Enterprise, and completely opposed the combination of the transport of passengers with such dangerous waste.
Men som hr. Barzanti fremførte, er det også indlysende, at teksten ikke er særlig meningsfuld i sin nuværende udformning, og jeg tror, grunden hertil er, at det var det forkerte »kun«, der blev stemt om.
What is also clear, however, is exactly what Mr Barzanti said, that the text does not make an awful lot of sense as it stands at present, and the reason, I suspect, is that the wrong 'only' was voted on.
Ordet »kun« forekommer to gange, nemlig både i stk. 1 og stk. 2 i artikel 2...
There are two 'onlys', one in paragraph 1 of Article 2 and one in paragraph 2 ...