natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I henhold til artikel 5, stk. 4 i omhandlede forordning kan de gældende satser afhængigt af produktkategorien fastsættes til indtil 5% eller andrage op til 15% af den oprindelige sats.
Article 5(3) of the above regulation permits the rates applicable to be varied, depending on the category of product, up to a rate of 5%, and for them to be increased by up to 15% of the initial rate.
Denne bestemmelse gør det under alle omstændigheder muligt for de spanske myndigheder, såfremt de måtte vælge det, inden for disse grænser at forhøje den sats, der skal anvendes for visse vegetabilske olier aftappet under forskellige former (flasker, dåser etc), idet de nedsætter den sats, der gælder for uaftappet olie fra 3% til 0%.
This provision allows the Spanish authorities, if they so wish and within the stated limits, to raise the rates applicable to certain vegetable oils in different forms of packaging (bottles, cans, etc.), whilst reducing the rate applicable to oil in bulk from 3% to 0%.
De Europæiske Fællesskabers Integrerede Tarif (TARIC), der fandt anvendelse på tidspunktet for de spanske myndigheders oprindelige fastsættelse af satsen, omfattede ikke underafdelinger, der gjorde det muligt at skelne mellem disse varer.
The integrated customs tariff of the European Communities (TARIC), applicable at the time when the initial rates were fixed by the Spanish authorities, made no provision for subdivisions allowing a distinction to be drawn between these products.
Da sådanne underafdelinger er blevet indført i TARIC senere, drejer det sig for de spanske myndigheder om at fastsætte satser, der finder anvendelse for de forskellige omhandlede varer under hensyn til satsændringen i henhold til artikel 5, stk. 3 i ovennævnte forordning.
Such subdivisions have in the meantime been introduced into the TARIC, and what the Spanish authorities had to do was to fix the rates applicable to the different products in question, complying with the variation in rates laid down in Article 5(3) of the above regulation.
På denne baggrund finder Kommissionen en forhøjelse af satsen fra 3% til 5% på visse aftappede olier forståelig.
In the light of these remarks, the Commission finds an increase in rates from 3% to 5% on certain packaged oils to be conceivable.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
SITTING OF THURSDAY, 11 MARCH 1993
B3-387/93) af Poettering m.fl. og (dok. B3-390/93) af Lannoye m.fl.
B3-360/93) by Mr Bertens and others, (Doc.
Aktuel og uopsættelig debat — Krænkelse af menneskerettigheder
Topical and urgent debate — Violation of human rights
B3-385/93) af Bertens, (dok. B3-396/93) af de la Malene m.fl., (dok. B3-400/93) af Antony m.fl., (dok. B3-424/93) afNewens og (dok. B3427/93) af Hoffog Robles Piquer
B3-364/93) by Mrs Mayer and others, (Doc.
B3-355/93) af Raffarin m.fl. og (dok. B3-398/93) af Lataillade m.fl
B3-385/93) by Mr Bertens, (Doc.
B3-430/93) af Bjørnvig m.fl., (dok.
B3-430/93) by Mrs Bjørnvig, Mrs Sandbæk and Mrs Ewing, (Doc.
B3-363/93) af André, (dok.
B3-363/ 93) by Mrs André, (Doc.
B3-376/93) af Arbeloa Muru, (dok.
B3-376/93) by Mr Arbeloa Muru, (Doc.
B3386/93) af Daly og Oomen-Ruijten, (dok. B3-394/93) af Guillaume m.fl., (dok. B3411/93) afWurtz m.fl., (dok.
B3-386/93) by Mrs Daly and Mrs Oomen-Ruijten, (Doc.
B3-420/93) af Ernst de la Graete, (dok. B3-362/93) af Gasóliba i Böhm m.fl., (dok. B3-367/93) af Robles Piquer m.fl., (dok.
B3-420/ 93) by Mrs Ernst de la Graete, (Doc.
B3-422/93) af Telkämper og Brito, (dok. B3-361/93) af Bertens m.fl., (dok. B3-426/93) afDury og Woltjer, (dok. B3-372/93) afNewens, (dok.
B3-422/93) by Mr Telkämper and Mr Brito, (Doc.
B3-423/93) af Staes og Telkämper, (dok.
B3-423/93) by Mr Staes and Mr Telkämper, (Doc.
B3-378/93) af Coates og Belo, (dok.
B3-378/93) by Mr Coates and Mrs Belo, (Doc.
B3381/93) af Canavarro og (dok.
B3-381/93) by Mr Canavarro, (Doc.
B3-405/93) af Amaral og Veil
B3-405/93) by Mr Amaral and Mrs Veil
Afslutning af Europa-Parlamentets regnskaberfor 1992 — Betænkning (dok.
Closure of Parliament's accounts for the 1992 financial year — Report (Doc.
A3-53/93) af Tomlinson
A3­53/93) by Mr Tomlinson cía, Mr Tauran, Mrs Grund, Mr Colino Sala­manca, Mr Suárez Gonzales, Mr Méndez de Vigo, Mrs Braun­Moser, Mr Steichen (Com­mission)
Søtransport i Adriaterhavet og Det Joniske Hav — Betænkning (dok. A3-67/93) af De Piccoli
Maritime transport in the Adriatic and Ionian Seas — Report (Doc.
Færdselssikkerhed — Betænkning (dok.
Road transport — Report (Doc.
A314/93) af Tauran
A3­14/93) by Mr Tauran
A VS-leverandører af bananer — Betænkning (dok.
ACΡ suppliers of bananas — Report (Doc.
A3-49/93) af Daly
A3­49/93) by Mrs Daly
Godkendelse af protokollen FORMANDEN. — Protokollen fra mødet i går er omdelt.
Approval of the Minutes sioner Pinheiro had been here up until a few minutes before, this was clearly a slap in the face to Parliament.
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg den som god kendt.
It was a disgraceful exhibition of how not to conduct politics.
Det er også praksis — det er et andet punkt.
PRESIDENT. — Yesterday's Minutes have been distri­buted.
Men der står, at det gik igennem.
Are there any comments?
TITLEY (S). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil geme henvise til side 24 i protokollen, nærmere bestemt punkt 22.
TITLEY (S). — Madam President, I rise on page 16 of the Minutes, Item 22.
Da vi i sidste måned behandlede Kommissionens arbejdsprogram, påhørte vi en redegørelse fra Kommissionen om, hvor seriøst den ville behandle Europa-Parlamentet i fremtiden.
You will recall that last month when we discussed the Commission's work programme we heard a number of statements from the Commission telling us how seriously they were going to take the European Parliament in future.
Vi fik også at vide, at kommissær Pinhero skulle have forbindelserne til Parlamentet som sagsområde.
We were also told that Commissioner Pinheiro had been appointed to deal with relations with the Parliament.
I går aftes efter spørgetiden meddelte Parlamentets formand som normalt, at Kommissionens meddelelse af dens reaktion på Parlamentets udtalelser var omdelt.
Last night, as is normal, at the end of Question Time the President of the Parliament reported on the Commission's statement of actions taken on the opinions of the Parliament.
Min kollega, hr. Martin, stillede Kommissionen et spørgsmål.
My colleague, Mr Martin, got up to ask a question of the Commission.
Den ansvarlige kommissær, hr. Pinheiro, som havde været til stede nogle øjeblikke før, var forsvundet, selv om han vidste, at dette punkt ville komme på dagsordenen.
The Commissioner responsible, Mr Pinheiro, who had been present a few moments before, had disappeared knowing this item was coming up on the agenda.
Faktisk var alle kommissærerne forsvundet på nær kommissær Milian, som besvarede det sidste spørgsmål.
In fact, all the Commission disappeared except for Commissioner Mil­Ian who was answering the last question.
Da kommissær Pinhero havde været til stede nogle få minut ter før, var dette helt klart udtryk for et slag i ansigtet på Parlamentet.
EWING (ARC). — Madam President, I rise on page 13 of the Minutes, which gives a description of the sorry state of affairs last night regarding the voting on the De Gucht report.
Det var en skammelig demonstration af, hvorledes man ikke skal opføre sig i politik.
You cannot call shouting across the Chamber the same thing as putting a formal request by vote to the Parliament.
FORMANDEN. — Deres ord er taget til efterretning.
It is practice as well — that is another point.
Lad os afvente, hvad Udvalget for Forretningsordenen siger.
We are bound to apply it and the House is bound to respect it.
Men jeg vil forelægge Deres protest.
I think this too is a matter for the Committee on the Rules of Procedure.
EWING (ARC). — (EN) Fra formand, jeg vil geme henvise til punkt 2o i protokollen, som afspejler den
My next point is that he refused points of order on these matters from myself and other Members.
Han henviste kun et enkelt punkt til Udvalget for
I have not received any reply.
Forretningsordenen, nemlig det punkt, som udgik.
PRESIDENT. — I have noted what you have said.
Han henviste ikke alle de øvrige punkter til...
Let us wait and see what the committee has to say.
FORMANDEN. — Deres ord er taget til efterretning.
EWING (ARC). — Madam President, that is not conect.
FORMANDEN. — Spørgsmålet vil blive forelagt Udvalget for Forretningsordenen.
PAISLEY (NI). — Madam President, I would like to support what has already been said by Mrs Ewing about page 13 and what happened to the De Gucht report.
Vi kan ikke genoptage for handlingen fra i går aftes.
I would like to draw your attention to something on which you could perhaps help us, Madam President.
Dette har nu spredt sig til min egen valgkreds, og jeg nærer stor frygt for, at dette spørgsmål nu måske ikke vil blive begrænset til fisk, men at gengældelsesaktionerne vil sprede sig til andre områder, især til transport af levende dyr og til grønsager.
There was only one person at the table outside trying to get the papers for all the Members that were lining up asking for them, and when I got back, votes had already been taken on this particular item.
Jeg anmodede Kommissionen om at komme med en snarlig redegørelse i håbet om, at en sådan redegørelse kunne køle situationen lidt ned.
Perhaps you could ensure in the future when this occurs that Distribution will be well manned so that Members can get their papers quickly and be able to come in and take part in the voting.
Må jeg med al respekt anmode Dem om at bede Kommissionen om meget snart her i formiddag at komme med en redegørelse?
PRESIDENT. — I note your point, but I think that Members should perhaps try to get hold of session documents in good time.
CRAWLEY (S). — (EN) Fru formand, det var ikke helt korrekt, hvad De sagde vedrørende hr. Titleys indlæg om Kommissionens manglede besvarelse.
PRESIDENT. — This matter will be refened to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities. Please let us not reopen yesterday evening's debate now.
Det er den kom missær, som har forbindelserne til Parlamentet som ansvarsområde, der bør blive tilbage det sidste kvarter af spørgetiden og oplyse medlemmerne om, hvad Kommissionen har foretaget sig siden sidste mødeperiode.
MORRIS (S). — Madam President, twice yesterday I asked for an early statement by the Commission on the violent protest we are now seeing on both sides of the channel — in France as well as in Britain — regarding the destruction of fish.
Dette har altid været skik og brug, og selv om det er en lille ting, ville det været meget kedeligt, hvis det bortfaldt.
This has now spread to my own constituency and my great fear is that this issue might not now be confined to fish, acts of retaliation might be taken in other directions, particularly in relation to the transport of live animals as well as vegetables.
FORMANDEN. — Jeg sagde allerede til hr. Titley, at Kommissionen handlede som kollegialt organ.
I requested the Commission to make an early statement in the hope that such a statement might have the effect of cooling down the situation.
Men jeg vil forelægge dette spørgsmål for formanden, så han kan optage de fornødne kontakter til Kommissionen.
May I ask you very respectfully to approach the Commission today with a view to their making a statement very early this morning?
ANASTASSOPOULOS (PPE). — (GR) Fru formand, jeg henviser også til side 23 i protokollen i den græske version vedrørende det emne, som også fru Ewing var inde på.
ANASTASSOPOULOS (PPE). — (GR) Madam Presi dent, I would also like to refer to page 23 of the Greek version of the Minutes on the same point as that raised by Mrs Ewing a moment ago.
Der rådede utvivlsomt en stor forvirring i går aftes.
There was a great deal of confusion last night; there can be no doubt about that.
Personligt mener jeg ikke, at formanden ikke skulle have ret til først at sætte ændringsforslag nr. 49 under afstemning.
Personally, I do not think that the President had no right to put Amendment 49 to the vote first.
Dette var en ret, han havde i overensstemmelse med artikel 92 i forretningsordenen.
According to Rule 92 of the Rules of Procedure, he does have the right.
Og det var også flertallets holdning, at ændringsforslag nr. 49 skulle sættes under afstemning først.
Furthermore, the majority in the House was in favour of voting on Amendment 49 first.
Men det, der var problemet, var ordførerens mundtlige ændring af ændringsfor slaget.
However, the point which I think raises a real problem is the fact that the rapporteur proposed an oral amendment to this amendment.
Da hr. De Gucht foreslog en mundtlig ændring af ændringsforslaget, skulle det være sket under anvendelse af forretningsordenens artikel 69, stk. 6, ifølge hvilken en mundtlig ændring først kan sættes under afstemning, efter at forsamlingen er blevet hørt, og medmindre mere end 10 medlemmer ikke protesterer.
When Mr De Gucht proposed a change to the amendment orally, Rule 69, paragraph 6 of our Rules of Procedure should have been applied. This states that an oral amend ment can only be put to the vote if the House has been consulted and if not more than 10 Members object.
Dette skete ikke.
That was not done.
Der rådede forvirring, og jeg bad også om ordet, men formanden så sig ikke i stand til at give mig ordet, fordi han ikke ønskede at indlede en debat for ikke at komplicere tingene yderligere.
I realize that. I asked for the floor at that point to remind the House of these provisions but the President was unable to call me.
Fru formand, jeg mener, vi bør være mere påpasselige ved mundtlige ændringsforslag.
I did not want to create a fuss and complicate matters even further at that point but I do think we should be much more circumspect with oral amendments.
Jeg havde samme problem i sidste måned, da jeg havde forsædet, og jeg synes, det er en sag, vi bør løse én gang for alle.
I had the same problem when I myself was in the Chair at the last partsession and I think it is a matter which has to be
Forretingsordenen indeholder artikel 69, stk. 6, som vi bør anvende, og som forsamlingen bør respektere.
That has always been the custom and although it seems a small thing, it would very bad for that to lapse.
FORMANDEN. — Deres klage er taget til efterretning.
Debates of the European Parliament
Jeg tror, at også dette spørgsmål kan løses af Udvalget for Forretningsordenen.
PRESIDENT. — May I repeat what I have already said to Mr Titley, that the Commission is a collegiate body and that Commissioners can therefore stand in for one another; I have refened this to the President so that he can discuss the matter with the Commission.
Jeg har ikke modtaget noget svar.
You will be aware of that violence in France and now in the United Kingdom.
KELLETT-BOWMAN (PPE). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil geme støtte hr. Paisleys bemærkninger.
KELLETT-BOWMAN (PPE). — Madam President, I rise to support the remarks made by Mr Ian Paisley.
Der var en vis forvirring i går aftes.
There was confusion last night.
De Guchtbetænkningen om en ensartet valgmåde var ikke opført på dagsordenen, men det var derimod en anden De Gucht-betænkning.
The De Gucht report on electoral reform was not specified on the agenda but another De Gucht report was.
Der var visse drøftelser om at lade De Guchtbetænkningen udgå, men det var ikke helt klart, hvilken De Gucht-betænkning, der var tale om.
There was some negotiation in the House to take the De Gucht out of turn but it was not really clear which De Gucht report.
Fra formand, jeg bryder mig ikke om, at de henvendt til hr. Paisley sagde, at medlemmerne burde skaffe papirerne i god tid.
Mr President, I am not happy that you should give a reply to Mr Paisley that Members should prepare themselves with papers in advance.
For i dette tilfælde kunne man ikke forudse, hvad der ville ske!
That really was a situation where one could not anticipate what was going to happen!
Fra formand, støttet af det spanske socialistparti nægter regeringen til mit politiske parti at udbetale det valgtilskud, som vi legalt har krav på efter at have beklædt dette mandat...
I think what we object to most was the way that Sir Fred Catherwood was treated like a fool last night when in fact he was explaining that we did have a problem.
DE GUCHT (LDR). — (EN) Fra formand, jeg er lidt overrasket over hele denne diskussion. Jeg kan ikke forstå, hvorledes et britisk medlem kunne være uvidende om, at betænkningen om en ensartet valgmåde skulle behandles og stemmes om.
DE GUCHT (LDR). — Madam President, I am a little surprised by this whole discussion.
Sir Fred Catherwood og andre kolleger sagde i går, at medlemmerne ikke var klar over, at det var dette emne, der blev behandlet.
Sir Fred Catherwood and another colleague said yesterday that people were not aware that the European Parliament was discussing this.
Alle og enhver ved, at Parlamentet kan beslutte, at afstemningsrækkefølgen er ændret.
Everybody well knows that it is possible for the House to decide that the order of voting is changed.
Det er det, der skete.
That is what happened.
Det vedtoges enstemmeigt, da det er den eneste mulige måde.
It happened in a unanimous way, which is the only way possible.
Ingen gik imod det.
Nobody argued against it.
Og nu er man pludselig utilfreds med resultatet, og ikke nok med det: de britiske medlemmer forsøger at skjule for deres egen offentlighed, hvorfor de ikke havde mod til at stemme om denne betænkning. Det er det, som virkelig skete i går.
And now suddenly people are unhappy with the result and, I would even add, it is not just a question of being unhappy with the result: it would seem that British Members are trying to keep from their own public why they did not have the courage to vote on this report.
Det er en skam, at dette kan forekomme i Parlamentet på et tidspunkt, hvor vi skal træffe en historisk afgørelse.
It is a pity it has to happen in this Parliament when we have a historic decision to take.
PAISLEY (NI). — (EN) Fra formand jeg vil geme støtte det, som fru Ewing sagde vedrørende punkt 20 og det, som skete med De Gucht-betænkningen.
I must ask Mr De Gucht to withdraw his slanderous comments about his British colleagues, when he said that they had not the courage to vote.
Jeg vil geme henlede Deres opmærksomhed på noget, hvor De måske kunne hjælpe os, fra formand. Da De Gucht-betænkningen skulle behandles, blev jeg nødt til at forlade salen for at få fat i et eksemplar af den, da den ikke var blandt dagsordenens papirer.
I told Mr De Gucht that I was coming here to vote and I was voting against his report.
Måske De kunne udvirke, at distributionen fremover bliver bemandet ordentligt, så medlemmerne kan få deres papirer hurtigt og nå at deltage i afstemningen?
Just because we do not agree with him does not mean that we lack courage. We are quite prepared to come here and say what we think.
KOSTOPOULOS (NI). — (GR) Fru formand, eftersom hr. Landa Mendibe blev frataget ordet, da han ville fremføre en sag, inden vi gik over til dagsordenen, vil jeg — selv om vi for øjeblikket er ved godkendelse af
I would ask you to give us the protection of the presidency and to ask Mr De Gucht to understand and to read — I believe he can read — the agenda for yesterday, where he will see that a different item was to be voted upon, but the President did not make that clear.
Jeg kender ikke til noget britisk medlem, som ønsker at bruge denne sag i pressen, således som han siger.
I know of no British Member who intends to use this matter in the press, as he suggests.
Den britiske presse er rent faktisk klar over vore holdninger.
Quite frankly, the British press is well aware of our views.
Vi behøver ikke sådanne eksempler, som han fremdrog i sine tidligere bemærkninger.
We do not need to use instances of this kind, as he suggested in his earlier comments.
Så jeg vil insistere på, at han tager sine bemærkninger tilbage, og at vi får en undskylding.
So I insist that we get a withdrawal and an apology from him.
(Bifald) protokollen — spørge, hvilket er det rette tidspunkt for et medlem til at stille et direkte spørgsmål.
KOSTOPOULOS (NI). — (GR) Madam President, given that you have just cut off Mr Landa Mendibe who had raised a point before we came to the agenda, I should like to ask you whether we are in fact discussing the approval of the Minutes and to ask what would be the appropriate moment for a Member to raise such a point directly, 'direttamente'?
Det forholder sig sådan, fru formand, at vi i den senere tid — ikke specielt når De har forsædet, men generelt — når vi ved mødets begyndelse ønsker at fremføre problemer, som ikke behøver at være særlig vigtige, men som ofte er betydningsfulde for os, efterhånden har fået det indtryk, at formandskabet ikke ønsker at høre på disse problemer.
When certain problems have been raised in connection with the agenda recently very briefly but on matters of considerable importance to many of us, we have started to get the distinct impression that the Presidency — not specifically just now that you are presiding but more generally — does not wish to hear about these things although they are important to all national MPs.
Jeg vil derfor opfordre til, at der udvises lidt mere fleksisbilitet, og til, at formanden indtager en tolerant og velvillig holdning over for disse problemer, der fremføres af medlemmerne
I should therefore like to ask the Presidency to show some flexibility and adopt a more patient and polite attitude when certain Members make these requests.
FORMANDEN. — Hr. De Gucht vil sikkert komme med en forklaring, men jeg er sikker på, at han ikke ønskede at fornærme nogen.
PRESIDENT. — We are still talking about the Minutes.
FORMANDEN. — Det drejer sig om godkendelsen af protokollen.
PRESIDENT. — Mr De Gucht will provide an explanation, but I am sure he did not intend to insult anyone.
Eventuelle andre spørgsmål kan forelægges efter dette punkt.
As regards the matter of changes to the agenda, this is provided for in the heading 'Votes on motions for resolutions on which the debate is closed', which comes at the end of every agenda.
HOWELL (PPE). — (EN) Fra formand, jeg vil geme rejse præcis det samme spørgsmål, som hr. Morris gjorde for lidt siden.
HOWELL (PPE). — Madam President, I rise on precise ly the same point that Mr Morris spoke on a few moments ago.
Jeg formoder, at han forsøger at fange Deres opmærksomhed igen for at få et svar.
I suspect he is trying to catch your eye yet again to get an answer from you.
De vil erindre, at hr. Morris i går fremsatte ønske om en snarlig redegørelse fra Kommissionen vedrørende situationen inden for fiskeriindustrien, som hurtigt forværres.
Yesterday you will recall, and this is minuted, that Mr Morris called for an early statement by the Commission concerning the rapidly deteriorating situation in the fishing industry.
De er sikkert bekendt med uroen i Frankrig, og nu i Det Forenede Kongerige.
LANE (RDE). — Madam President, I rise on the same point.
Fru formand, vi er meget bekymrede over, at Kommissionens tidligere udtalelser opmuntrer til denne vold, fordi Kommissionen handlede så hurtigt efter begivenhederne i Bretagne for en uge siden.
I would like to point out to Mr De Gucht — I do not what country he comes from — that I am certainly not British and I was confused yesterday by his report.
Vi vil indtrængende anmode Dem om at udvirke, at Kommissionen kommer med sin redegørelse i dag og ikke først i morgen.
I think many of our colleagues from other Member States were also confused.
Fiskerne kræver det, og vi mener det er berettiget.
In fact, we were halfway through the
LANE (RDE). — (EN) Fra formand, det er til samme punkt. Jeg vil geme sige henvendt til hr. De Gucht —jeg ved ikke, hvilket land han kommer fra — at jeg bestemt ikke er brite, og at jeg i går var forvirret over hans betænkning, og jeg tror også, at kolleger fra andre medlemsstater var forvirret.
Please let us try not to reopen this discussion.
Vi var faktisk halvvejs gennem afstemningen, før det lykkedes min gruppe at få fat i ændringsforslagene til den betænkning, som var under afstemning — for da vi så på dagsordenen, var der tale om en anden betænkning.
voting process before my group was able to obtain the actual amendments of the report we were voting on, because when we looked at the agenda we saw a different report.