natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Formanden. — Spørgsmålet er, om retten til at stille ændringsforslag og derved fremtvinge en afstemning ikke er vigtigere for medlemmerne end stemmeforklaringerne. klaringerne.
PRESIDENT. — The question is whether tabling amendments and thereby compelling a vote is not a more powerful right in the hands of Members than explanations of vote.
Formanden. — Hr. Wijsenbeek, undskyld, men jeg må korrigere Dem: Jeg har ikke afgivet en sådan erklæring.
WIJSENBEEK (LDR). — (NL) Mr President, and group chairman Mr Klepsch, it is all very well for you to say that no more explanations of vote will be taken.
Ford (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er enig med hr. Klepsch i, at vi hør henvise spørgsmålet om stemmeforklaringer til Præsidiet, og med hr. Elliott i, at Parlamentet er gået i stå.
FORD (S). — Mr President, I agree with Mr Klepsch that we should refer the matter of explanations of vote to the Bureau and with the point Mr Elliot made namely that this House is grinding to a halt.
Wijsenbeek (LDR). — (DE) For det første kan jeg forsikre Dem, at medlemmerne ikke vil acceptere det.
WIJSENBEEK (LDR). — (NL) First of all, I am bound to tell you that Members will not accept that.
For det andet må det undersøges af Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlem mernes Immunitet, og jeg vil sørge for, at de individuelle medlemmers rettigheder sikres.
Second, the Committee on The Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities will have to consider the matter, and I for my part will ensure that individual Members' rights are safeguarded.
Det nye, som jeg gerne vil fremføre, vedrører tilrettelæggelsen af vore forhandlinger.
The new point I want to make concerns the way we schedule our debates.
I går var jeg involveret i forhandlingen om Schengen-aftalen, som var opdelt ligesom Cæsars Gallerkrige i tre dele, afbrudt af afstemningstider.
Yesterday I was involved in the debate on the Schengen agreement, which was divided like Caesar's Gaul into three parts, interspersed with hours of voting.
Det er virkelig absurd, at den, der ønsker at følge forhandlingen, må bruge halvanden dag med at gå ud og ind af Parlamentet, fordi forhandlingen er afbrudt af lange perioder med afstemningstid. Kunne vi ikke drøfte tingene samlet i stedet for at opdele dem på denne absurde måde?
Ir really is absurd that anyone who wishes to follow the debate has to spend about a day-and-a-half nipping in and out of this House as debates are interrupted by long periods of voting time.
Det er jo sådan, at de individuelle medlemmer med taletider på to minutter simpelt hen ikke længere kan udtrykke sig og derfor tvinges til at afgive stemmeforklaringer.
It is a fact that ordinary Members cannot avail themselves of their speaking time of two minutes and are therefore obliged to make explanations of vote.
Vi skal på fem mødedage igen nem tre gange så mange lovgivningsprocesser som medlemsstaternes parlamenter.
Over the five-day partsession we have to deal with three times the number of legislative procedures as the parliaments of Member States.
Hr. Klepsch har som udvalgsformand til enhver tid mulighed for at tage ordet, men vi normale medlemmer har alt for sjældent mulighed for at udtrykke os.
Mr Klepsch can speak any time he chooses, but we ordinary Members have precious little opportunity to express our opinions. This Parliament no longer holds genuine debates.
Vi bør endelig have et virkeligt hjemsted, nemlig Bruxelles.
We should finally make sure we get a single place of work, and it should be in Brussels.
Da hr. Martin førte forsædet, gav han løfte om, at Præsidiet ville tage afstemningen op til fornyet overvejelse med henblik på at fælde en endelig dom.
When Mr Martin presided he gave an undertaking to the House that the Presidency would review the vote after with a view to making a final assessment.
Med hensyn til ændringsforslag nr. 26
In respect of page 7b of the English version of the Minutes, specifically amendments Nos 26 and 256, I would ask the Presidency whether they will consider the compatibility of amendment No 256 in the light of the previous vote on amendment No 26.
Formanden. — Hr. Wijsenbeek, jeg forstår Dem godt.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Wijsenbeek, I quite appreciate that.
Men jeg har ikke afgivet nogen erklæring om, at stemmeforklaringerne skal afskaffes, men blot på foranledning af hr. Klepsch sagt, at Præsidiet vil beskæftige sig hermed.
However, I did not say that explanations of vote should be dispensed with, but simply, in response to Mr Klepsch, that the enlarged Bureau would deal with the matter.
Formanden. — Det vil blive undersøgt.
COIMBRA MARTINS (S). — (PT) Mr President, I should like to support Mr Coates' suggestion and so help to correct an oversight which has been made by this session.
og 256 vil jeg gerne bede Præsidiet overveje, om det vil undersøge foreneligheden af ændringsforslag nr. 256 i lyset af den forudgående afstemning om ændringsforslag nr. 26.
Congratulating him on his success and sending our best wishes to the Soviet people when the radicalization of the reforms is announced is not just a worthy gesture which is likely to be appreciated in Moscow.
Formanden. — Jeg skal meddele, at formanden efter aftale med forslagsstillerne har foretaget visse småændringer i det beslutningsforslag, som Parla­mentet vedtog i går i forbindelse med den uretfær­dige dom i Irak, på baggrund af den slemme afgø­relse, der er truffet, idet der måtte tages hensyn til den allerede fuldbyrdede henrettelse.
It is also a way of showing that wc want Europe, which is embarking upon a fascinating and dangerous process, to have its hopes confirmed and the dangers to be averted. The person who has made this process possible and thus helped to speed up the course of history and correct its chaos is, as we all know, President Gorbachev.
Coimbra Martins (S). — (PT) Hr. formand, jeg tilslutter mig hr. Coates' forslag og ønsker dermed at bidrage til at udbedre en mangel ved denne mødeperiode.
ELLIOTT (S). — Mr President, we are well behind in Parliament's timetable.
Aldrig har Mikhail Gorbatjov haft så stor magt som nu, og aldrig har situationen været vanskeligere.
I do not really wish to delay things further but if you are going to refer anything to the Bureau for examination could we please refer to the Bureau the way in which we spent 3 Vi hours yesterday morning in endless voting on farm prices.
At ønske ham og det sovjetiske folk held og lykke med den bebudede radikalisering af reformpolitikken er kun en velfortjent gestus, som uden tvivl vil blive påskønnet i Moskva.
It is this kind of nonsense which brings the House into disrepute. I do not know any other parliament that behaves in such a ridiculous manner.
Ligeledes må vi ønske for Europa, som har indledt en fascine­rende og farlig proces, at håbene går i opfyldelse og farerne afværges.
The essential differences that existed in this House on that issue could easily have been encapsulated into a number of key votes, if the kind of practice adopted in many national parliaments were to be followed.
Den person, der gjorde denne proces mulig og således fremskyndede historiens gang, var som bekendt præsident Gorbatjov.
What I would like the Bureau to examine is how to reduce the absurd amount of time spent in plenary voting on the minute details of thousands of amendments in a totally unnecessary manner.
Formanden. — Hr. Coimbra Martins, dette var ikke et indlæg til forretningsordenen.
LAMBRIAS (PPE), rapporteur. — (GR) Mr President, I return to the point of order raised by Mr Oliva García.
Lambrias (PPE), ordfører. — (GR) Hr. formand, jeg vil vende tilbage til det spørgsmål til forretnings­ordenen, som blev rejst af hr. Oliva García.
(Portugal adopted the draft legislative resolution)
Derefter gav De udtryk for, at det modsatte var besluttet.
C3-2/90) for a regulation concerning statistical information to be supplied by the Member States on cereal production pressed the view that the opposite had been decided.
Dette er ikke tilfældet.
The opposite had not been decided.
Det var besluttet, at forhandlingen om min betænkning skulle fortsættes efter afstemningen uden forhandling.
What was decided was to continue the debate on my report after the voting without debate.
Det er uforståeligt, at der skal ske en sådan opsplitning af forhandlingen om et stort program, således at ordføreren først taler og kom­missæren giver et detaljeret svar, hvorefter der kom­mer afstemninger, andre betænkninger og andre afstemninger, før vi kan tage tråden op igen og forhandle om programmet.
It is unthinkable to make a hash of the debate on a major programme by having the rapporteur speak first, hearing a detailed answer from the Commissioner, and then interjecting votes, other reports, and yet more votes before trying once more to pick up the thread of the debate about a programme.
Dette er uacceptabelt set ud fra et parlamentarisk synspunkt.
That is a parliamentary nonsense.
Der kan natur­ligvis foretages afstemninger om betænkningerne uden forhandling, men der kan ikke indskydes andre forhandlinger og andre afstemninger, så der ændres helt ved kontinuiteten i forhandlingen.
Let there of course be votes on the reports without debate, but we cannot have other debates and other votes stuck in between so that the continuity of the debate will have been totally disrupted.
Formanden. — Betænkningernes rækkefølge er ble­vet vedtaget af Parlamentet.
PRESIDENT. — The order in which reports are being taken was decided by Parliament.
A3­54/90) af Denys for Udvalget om Transport og Turisme om forslag fra Kommis­sionen til Rådet (KOMÍ89) 572 — dok.
A3-54/90 by Mrs Denys, on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 572 final — Doc.
C3­248/89) til forordning om ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 3164/76 om adgang til markedet for international vejgodstransport
C3-248/89) for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 3164/76 concerning access to the market and the international carriage of goods by road
Howell (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, må jeg vende tilbage til protokollen og Sir Christopher Prouts bemærkninger?
HOWELL (ED). — Mr President, may I again come back to the subject of the Minutes and the comments made by Sir Christopher Prout.
Der er endnu et problem på side 74­75, der svarer til det, som Sir Christopher rejste.
There is a further problem on page 68, similar to that raised by Sir Christopher.
I dette tilfælde drejer det sig om medansvarsafgiften på mælk, hvor de to relevante ændringsforslag er nr. 94, der kræver en total afskaffelse, og nr. 230, der taler om fritagelse for de første hundredtusind liter.
In this case it concerns the co-responsibility levy on milk where the two relevant amendments are No 94 calling for a total abolition and No 230 which talks of abolition on the first hundred thousand litres.
Jeg håber, at det, som Sir Christopher sagde, også gælder for dette problem, og at Præsidiet vil træffe en afgørelse.
I hope the point raised by Sir Christopher will also be applied to that particular difficulty and that the Bureau will come to a decision.
Wijsenbeek mer denne første analyse netop rettidigt til at tjene som rettesnor under forberedelsen af budgettet for 1991.
PRESIDENT. — I would point out, in relation to the resolution which Parliament, adopted yesterday in respect of the unjust sentence in Iraq, that the President, in agreement with the authors, has made a number of small amendments in the light of the harsh decision taken and these were needed in order to take account of the execution.
Mens budgettet i de sidste ti år, siden tidspunktet for det første direkte valg, er steget i en hurtig rytme — mere end 10% årligt — er gennemførelsesgraden forringet regelmæssigt gennem i det mindste de sidste seks år.
WIJSENBEEK (LDR), in writing. — (NL) The report on the automatic and agreed extension of Community transportation licences has our approval since it is a step towards the complete abolition of such licences by the end of 1992.
uden problemer, primært fordi mange i Parlamentet og i Rådet ikke ville tillade noget, før der blev indsat en ordentlig mekanisme til løsning af krisen.
However, we have not been able to reach this point without some difficulty since, both in Parliament and in the Council, there are many who would make no concessions unless there were first set up a proper crisis-management mechanism.
Kom missionen har nu forelagt et forslag herom, og derom kunne Denys-betænkningen om kørselstilladelserne foretages uden forhandling.
The Commission has now come forward with a relevant proposal and therefore the Denys report on transportation licences could be taken without debate.
Dog er der stadig et problem, for om den såkaldte overkapacitet, der ikke stemmer overens med alle udsigterne til vækst i transportsektoren, huserer der de vildeste og mest ubegrundede rygter.
However, we still have a problem here because the wildest unfounded rumours are going the rounds in connection with the socalled over-capacity, which does not fit in with the many projections for growth in the transport sector.
Nogle taler om 50% tomkørsel, andre om 15%, og ingen ved det præcist.
There is some talk of 50% of runs unloaded; another figure bandied about is 15%, and nobody has any clear idea.
Kommissionen må forsøge at få fuld klarhed herom, før den fremsætter forslag helt ud af den blå luft om en såkaldt krisemekanisme, der ikke har noget ind hold.
The Commission must try to get this sorted out before coming up with proposals for a socalled crisis management mechanism.
Her findes der adskillige mulige forklaringer.
It is clear that in relation to several budget lines or areas, delays and administrative difficulties have arisen.
Den første og mest optimistiske ville være, at administrationen havde administreret midlerne mere effektivt end oprindeligt antaget, og at den følgelig har opnået besparelser.
This applies in particular to appropriations carried over automatically to the following year.
Denne hypotese vil vi absolut ikke udelukke for nogle områders vedkommende, men efter at have analyseret en række konti med en særlig lav gennemførelsesrate er jeg kommet til den opfattelse, at årsagerne ikke er helt så glædelige.
Delays and the inefficient administration of funds would normally mean, because of the principle of annuality, that such funds were lost. We therefore urge that the criteria for making carry-overs be applied more strictly.
( Ved successive afstemninger vedtoges forslagene til lovgivningsmæssig beslutning)
(In successive votes Parliament adopted the legislative resolutions)
Afslutning af Europa-Parlamentets regnskaber for 1989
Closure of Parliament's accounts for 1989
Et tredje punkt er den unøjagtige budgetlægning.
A third point is the lack of precision in budget planning.
En nøjagtighed på 100% er naturligvis ikke mulig.
Of course total accuracy is not possible.
Flere konti synes dog systematisk at være vurderet for højt og indeholder således åbenbart en skjult reserve, f.eks. konto 1004.
But several lines appear to be systematically estimated too high so that they clearly contain a hidden contingency reserve, for example, item 1004.
Her lægges der 13 mødeperioder i Parlamentet til grund, hvilket imidlertid aldrig er forekommet.
Provision is made here for 13 partsessions of Parliament, and this never takes place.
Et andet eksempel er anvendelsesgraden på 63% af den officielle reserve.
A further example is the 63% rate of utilization of the official contingency reserve.
Her findes der mangler, som vi må tage hensyn til ved udarbejdelsen af budgettet for 1991.
These are air bubbles which we need to take into account when planning the 1991 budget.
Den betænkning, jeg forelægger Dem i dag, skulle sætte os i stand til at gøre dette.
A3-63/90) by Mrs Theato, on behalf of the Committee on Budgetary Control, on the closure of Parliament's accounts for the 1989 financial year (Administrative expenditure).
Ud fra vort synspunkt rejser der sig et yderligere problem, nemlig de uudnyttede midler, f.eks. i for bindelse med videreuddannelse af personalet.
A further problem from our point of view is underutilization for example for the further training of staff.
Her må der udarbejdes nøjagtige analyser for også at udføre det, der var hensigten i Parlamentet, som har opført disse midler.
Here we need precise studies to ensure that Parliament's intention of using these funds is carried out in practice.
Dette spørgsmål om ansvarlig hed skal klarlægges som led i dechargen.
The question of responsibility needs to be clarified as part of the discharge procedure.
Parlamentets regnskaber for regnskabsåret 1989 blev fremsendt til os af administrationen for ti dage siden. Vi analyserede og behandlede dem på vort møde i tirsdags.
THEATO (PPE), rapporteur. — (DE) Mr President, the ideal form of budgetary control would be if experience gained in monitoring were immediately put into practice.
I dag kan vi allerede forelægge Dem konklusionerne.
The report which I am presenting today seeks to enable us to do just that.
Et par bemærkninger til de kvalitative aspekter ved budgetgennemførelsen.
Let me now come to some of the qualitative aspects of the book-keeping.
administrationens side bekræfter det generelle ind tryk, at den gennemsigtighed, som vi gang på gang har krævet, mangler.
The rather skimpy analyses made by the administration confirm the general impression that the transparency we are always calling for does not exist.
Administrationsstrukturerne er på ingen måde rationelle og tilpasset Parlamentets funktionsmåde.
The administrative structures are by no means rational nor are they necessarily geared to Parliament's method of operating.
Administration erkender selv dette, og i sine forslag til budgettet for 1991 går generalsekretæren ind for en administration på grundlag af mål, hvor opgaverne skal omfordeles mellem gene raldirektoraterne efter funktionelle kriterier.
The administration itself recognizes this fact and in its proposals for the 1991 budget, the Secretary-General makes a case for management by objectives, with the responsibilities of the directoratesgeneral being redefined on the basis of functional criteria.
Tomlinson (S). — (EN) Rettelser ligesom så mange andre ting når åbenbart frem til næstformændene, inden de når frem til de menige medlemmer af Parlamentet.
Parliament's accounts for the 1989 financial year were sent to us by the administration 10 days ago. We analysed them and discussed them at our meeting on Tuesday.
Jeg kan ikke finde min blandt mine papirer, men det glæder mig meget, at den er der.
Today we are already in a position to present our conclusion.
Med hensyn til betænkningens indhold vil jeg som sagt gerne komplimentere fru Theato. Hun har gjort et meget godt stykke arbejde.
The first conclusion hardly provide grounds for optimism.
Der er 34 punkter, som jeg især gerne vil fremhæve på Den Socialistiske Gruppes vegne.
Over the ten years since the first direct elections, the budget has been growing at a rapid rate, more than 10% a year, whereas the rate of utilization has been falling for at least six years.
Jeg vil gøre det kortfattet på grund af tidspresset.
In the course of time utilization has dropped from 98% to less than 94%.
Vi kan kun glæde os over dette forslag, dog nærer jeg personligt visse tvivl om dets seriøsitet, da det nemlig kun vedrører personaleplanen, hvorimod området budgetmidler også burde være omfattet.
We warmly welcome this proposal, but I personally have certain doubts as to how seriously it is intended because it only relates to posts and should include the area of budget appropriations.
Desuden er forslagene i betragtning af hele problemet kun punktuelle.
Moreover, the proposals made only relate to specific aspects of the overall problem.
Budgetmyndigheden har brug for en underopdeling af midlerne efter mål og funk tioner, uden hvilken en egentlig budgetpolitik ikke er mulig.
The budgetary authority needs the resources to be subdivided according to aims and functions for a genuine budgetary policy to be feasible.
Uden sådanne egentlige analyser kan Parlamentet kun gennemføre de udviklinger, der er besluttet andetsteds.
Without a proper analysis of this kind, Parliament is only able to carry out what has been decided elsewhere.
Dette gælder især for området »informatik«.
This is particularly true of the data-processing sector.
Analysen af budgetgennemførelsen kan vise os, hvorfor vi ikke får hold på udviklingen og forringelsen af vore arbejdsbetingelser.
A study of the implementation of the budget reveals why have no control over the development and deterioration in our conditions of work.
Gennemsigtighed er imidlertid ikke noget mål i sig selv. Parlamentet må også have den faste hensigt at ville gennemføre de nødvendige reformer.
But transparency is not an end in itself.
Dette er i betragtning af udviklingen af demokratiet i Europa vor opgave.
This is our task given the development of democracy in Europe.
Jeg vender mig hurtigt til punkt 11, der er et punkt, som alle medlemmer af Parlamentet bør tage virkelig seriøst, fordi det konstaterer, at der ikke er noget passende instrument i Parlamentet til analyse af de midler, vi anvender.
Parliament has, however, a further responsibility towards the citizens of Europe, namely to monitor the use of public funds and ensure they are used properly. We therefore urge the administration to make efforts towards this end.
Parlamentet har imidlertid også endnu et ansvar for Europas borgere, nemlig at kontrollere administrationen af de offentlige midler og sikre deres rentabilitet.
There are several possible explanations. The first and most optimistic would be that the administration was making more effective use of resources than it had originally thought possible and thus made appropriate economies.
Vi kræver derfor sådanne bestræbelser af administrationen.
While we would by no means exclude this hypothesis in certain areas, I have concluded from analysis of a number of budget lines with a particularly low rate of utilization that the causes are less encouraging.
Omfanget af bortfaldne midler beløb sig i 1988 til 35 mio ECU.
THEATO cancelled was ECU 35 million.
Her blev der unødigt mobiliseret mange fællesskabsmidler.
In this case considerable Community resources were mobilized to no effect.
Jeg håber, at de vil bidrage til forberedelsen af et godt budget for 1991.
I hope that they will contribute to good budget planning for 1991.
Endelig henleder jeg opmærksomheden på punkt 12, fordi det også er vigtigt. Det er noget, som Parlamentet før eller siden vil være nødt til at tage op. Det henviser meget udtrykkeligt til Revisionsrettens beretning, og en krydshenvisning til denne beretning vil føre Dem til det tal, der er velkendt i Parlamentet, kasseunderskuddet på 4,1 mio belgiske franc.
quite explicitly to a Court of Auditors' report and a cross-reference to that report will lead you to the figure well known in this House, the cash deficiency of 4.1 million Belgian francs.
Betænkningen siger, at dette og alle andre beløb skal opkræves hurtigst muligt i overensstemmelse med de gældende retsprocedurer. Når Parlamentet har stemt for dette, forventer vi, at det gennemføres.
The report says that this and any other sums must be collected as speedily as possible in accordance with the due processes of law.
Tomlinson (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, må jeg først og fremmest komplimentere fru Theato for hendes arbejde og hendes betænkning.
TOMLINSON (S). — Mr President, may I first of all congratulate Mrs Theato on her work and on her report.
Vi har imidlertid ét problem med betænkningen, som ikke har noget at gøre med det, fru Theato har forelagt os, men en vis forvirring, som er blevet skabt i teksten på visse sprog, nemlig alle sprog undtagen fransk og græsk.
We have one problem, however, with the report, which has nothing to do with what Mrs Theato has put before us, but derives from some confusion created in the text in certain languages, in fact in all languages other than French and Greek.
Med disse få ord komplimenterer jeg endnu en gang fru Theato og tilbyder Den Socialistiske Gruppes støtte til hendes fortræffelige betænkning.
I commend to the House that we had the report early enough for all committee amendments to be dealt with in committee without taking up time in the House.