natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Men der burde stå i en sådan rapport, at Kommissionen vil gøre alt for at fortælle danskerne, hvad EF-samarbejdet i virkeligheden er værd, englænderne, at den sociale dimension er til deres eget bedste, franskmændene, at det ikke er nok med store ord om samarbejde, når det saboteres i det små, italienerne, at mafiavæsenet må fjernes nu, tyskerne om Marshallplanens storslåede virkninger på det tyske Wirtschafts-
But a report such as this ought to say that the Commission will do everything in its power to tell the Danes what EC cooperation is in fact worth, the British that the social dimension is in their own interests, the French, that fine words about cooperation are not enough when they are sabotaged in the small print, the Italians, that the mafia beast must be dispatched now, the Ger mans about the Marshall plan's wide-ranging effects on the German Wirtschaftswunder and finally, the Greeks, that an international tourist boycott is the answer to what they are doing. That is all it would take.
Ud af de mange forhold der kunne drages frem, fortjener specielt forholdet mellem Syd- og Nordeuropa at blive nævnt.
President Delors, in his speech this morning, expressed one serious doubt.
Det er klart, at man skal påskønne viljen til at iværksætte en udligningsfond, men jeg mener ikke, at det er tilstrækkeligt.
How could measures to increase employment be reconciled with the convergence required by monetary policy?
Sandheden er, at kløften i henhold til de tal, man kan finde i statistikkerne, er tiltagende, og at bruttonationalproduktet i foreksempel mål-1-regionerne er stigende, og at der derfor i lyset af disse kendsgernin
VAN VELZEN (S). — (NL) Madam President, the Community's credibility and its strength are determined in large measure by the degree to which the Community contributes to resolving Europe's major problems.
De europæiske borgere kræver derfor med rette foranstaltninger som svar på for eksem pel den økonomiske recession, den stærkt stigende arbejdsløshed og en reaktion på den stigende vold i Jugoslavien og den uophørlige forværring af miljøet.
VAN VELZEN steeply rising unemployment, and in reaction to the increasing violence in Yugoslavia and the never-ending deterioration in our environment.
Jeg vil ikke parodiere Scarron og Georges Pompidou på samme gang og sige, at De er her skyggen af en regering, der anmoder skyggen af et Parlament om skyggen af et tillidsvotum. Men alligevel.
assessing individuals, ascertaining a proper political balance, evaluating the content of a programme — and what we see here.
Vi har naturligvis ikke midlerne til at kontrollere personernes beskaffenhed, og vi har derfor ingen grund til at nære mistillid til dem.
We do not, of course, have the resources to verify the credentials of the individuals concerned and we have no reason to doubt them.
Vi har ingen politisk ligevægt at godkende, eftersom den er forudbestemt.
We have no political balance to approve, since it is predetermined.
Hvad program met angår — jeg taler om det skrevne program — var det en underlig blanding af redelige hensigter og stiltiende forbehold, der ikke kunne stille Europa-Parlamentet til freds.
As for the programme, and I mean the printed programme, that was a peculiar mixture of worthy intentions and mental blocks which did not satisfy this House.
De har gjort meget, navnlig i dag, for at ændre tingene og for at slippe ud af dette skyggeteater.
You have done a lot, especially today, to change things and get us out of this theatre of shadows.
Takket være denne afhandling er Deres program, der var et halvtomt glas, blevet et glas, der er trekvart fuldt.
Thanks to that speech your programme, which was a half-empty glass is now a glass three-quarters full.
Men hvad institutio nerne angår, kan hr. Pinheiros glas, som De er fælles om, langt fra — og det ved De — slukke vor tørst.
But the institutional content of Mr Pinheiro's glass, which is shared by you all, is far from enough to quench our thirst, as you well know.
Det beklager vi.
We regret that fact.
Vi beklager, at De ikke med større dristighed er gået i gang med at tilpasse adfærdskodeksen.
We regret the fact that you have not given a bolder undertaking to modify the code of conduct.
Vi beklager i særdeleshed, at De hidtil ikke har reageret på vort forslag om at knytte bestræbelserne for at opstille et hierarki for retsreglerne sammen med Kommissionens tilsagn om tilbagekaldelse, for så vidt angår bestemmelser, der måtte have lovgivningsmæssig karakter.
We are particularly sorry that you have not as yet replied to our proposal seeking to link moves towards a hierarchy between the categories of Community act with an undertaking by the Commission back down on provisions of a legislative nature.
Vi er af den opfattelse, at der er tale om konvergens mellem vore institutioner, når det gælder hierarkiet for retsregler, og at det ville være udmærket at udnytte den i fællesskab med henblik på at forbedre forbindelserne mellem os.
We believe there is some convergence between our institutions concerning a hierarchy of Community acts and that it would be a good idea to handle this together in order to improve our relations.
Hr. kommissionsformand, må jeg slutte med at sige, at vi af Dem ventede os en kontrakt.
Mr President, may I end by saying that we expected you to be offering us a contract.
De anmoder faktisk om en velsignelse.
Instead you are asking for our blessing.
Da vi er kristelige-demokrater, vil vi geme give Dem den, men De skal vide, at frustrationen er stor, og vi har en fornemmelse af, at der endnu skal tilbagelægges en lang vej, før vore forbindelser er et ægte EF-demokrati værdige.
Being Christian Democrats we shall willingly give it, but you should realize that there is a very great sense of frustration here and we feel that there is still a long way to go before our relations are really worthy of a true Community democracy.
FORSÆDE: Antonio CAPUCHO Næstformand
IN THE CHAIR: Mr CAPUCHO Vice-President
Kommissionens arbejdsprogram skulle gøre klart, at Fællesskabet har forstået kravet om en konkret og synlig politik.
The Commission's work programme ought to make it clear that the Community has understood that call for specific and visible policies.
Men det gør mig ondt at måtte konstatere: borgerne ser sig bedraget.
But I am sorry to have to observe that our citizens' hopes have been deceived.
Hr. Delors' tale i formiddags var efter min overbevisning klar og inspirerende, og vi deler også Kommissionens prioriteter: etableringen af en virkelig fælles udenrigs- og sikkerhedspolitik, en kursændring af den stærke nedsættelse af den økonomiske aktivitet, realiseringen af socialpagtens handlingsprogram og integration af miljøbeskyttelse i andre opgaver i fællesskabspolitikken.
Commission President Delors' speech this morning was, in my view, lucid and inspiring, and the Commission's priorities are also ours: the establishment of a genuinely common foreign and security policy, the correction of the serious slowing-down of economic activity, the realization of the Social Charter's action programme and the integration of environmental protection measures into other branches of common policy.
Disse prioriteter danner i sig selv grundlag for et godt samarbejde mellem Parlament og Kommission.
In themselves these priorities lay the foundation for sound cooperation between Parliament and Commission.
Men hvilket armod ved konkretiseringen af prioriteterne!
But what penury when it comes to implementing those priorities!
Her åbenbares der virkelig intet af den erkendelse, som lå så klart i hr. Delors indlæg her til formiddag: mandatet på to år er måske kort, men måske af afgørende betydning.
There is truly nothing to be found here of the understanding that this morning so clearly informed Mr Delors' address: the two-year mandate may be short but possibly also of decisive importance.
Dette arbejdsprogram er rent ud sagt svagt i dets antydning af det konkrete politiske instrument og lader spørgsmål ubesvarede, spørgsmål som miljøkonferencen i Rio, som syntes at være en meget lovende frisk start.
This work programme is downright weak where indication of specific policy instruments is concerned and leaves certain questions open, questions such as the environmental conference in Rio, which appeared to be making a fresh start full of promise.
Men hvordan forholder det sig med gennemførelsen af de dér indgåede aftaler?
But what is the situation as regards implementation of what was agreed there?
Hvordan står det til med det femte miljøhandlingsprogram eller med planerne om indførelse af miljøafgiften?
What is the position with the fifth environmental action programme or with the plans for introducing the eco-tax?
Altsammen sager, hvor Kommissionen efter min mening skulle spille en banebrydende rolle. Hvordan står det til med vækstinitiativet, som blev besluttet i Edinburgh? Kommer den nye investeringsfond?
These are all issues where the Commission should, in my view, be playing a pioneer's role.
Hvomår står de fem milliarder til rådighed?
When will the five billion be available?
Hvilket pres udøves og kan der udøves på medlemsstaterne for, at de yder deres del?
What pressure is being and can be exerted on the Member States to hand over their share?
Jeg deler hr. Delors' standpunkt, at arbejdstagernes medbestemmelsesret har usædvanlig høj prioritet, men de nylige dumpingfænomener omkring Hoover gør det klart, at også direktiver for eksempel vedrørende arbejdstider og atypisk arbejde haster usædvanlig meget.
I share Mr Delors' view that employees' right of codecision deserves an extremely high priority, but the recent dumping phenomena in connection with Hoover make it clear that directives on, for instance, work times and atypical employ ment are very urgently needed.
Hvad er nu i realiteten merværdien af den nye udenrigs- og sikker hedspolitik i øjeblikket?
What is actually at the present moment the value added of the new foreign and security policy?
Udadtil kommer der udelukkende strid om kompetencefordelingen, og den franske regering har ved den første den bedste lejlighed gjort klart for kommissionsmedlemmet Van den Broek, at han ikke må bevæge sig uden for mandatet.
All that the outside world hears is squabbling about division of responsibilities, and the French Government has lost no time in making it clear to Commissioner van den Broek that he must keep within the limits of his mandate.
LANE (RDE). — (EN) Hr. formand, lige før pausen rettede hr. Lannoye et offentligt angreb mod den tidligere kommissær MacSharry, der ikke er til stede, så han kan forsvare sig.
LANE, (RDE). — Mr President, just before the break, Mr Lannoye made a public attack on former Commissioner MacSharry, who is not here to defend himself.
Jeg vil gerne gøre en meget kort bemærkning, fordi hr. Lannoye sagde, at hr. MacSharry havde brugt sin stilling som kommissær til at påvirke visse beslutninger i GATT-aftalen.
I would like to make a very brief point because Mr Lannoye said that Mr MacSharry had used his position as a Commissioner to influence certain decisions in the GATT agree ment.
Jeg vil gerne understrege, at hr. MacSharry er blevet anmodet om at indtræde i en irsk virksomhed.
I would like to point out that Mr MacSharry has been asked to join an Irish company.
Denne virksomhed beskæftiger sig med produktion af emballage.
That company is involved in packaging manufacturing.
Den har datterselskaber i andre EF-lande og i USA.
It has subsidiaries in European Community countries and in the United States.
Emballage er ikke omfattet af nogen GATT-aftale og har heller ikke noget med levnedsmiddelindustrien eller landbruget at gøre.
Packaging is not subject to any GATT agreement, nor is it related to food or agriculture.
DELORS, formand for Kommissionen. — (FR) Jeg vil blot gerne af hensyn til protokollen tilføje, så hr. Mac-
As you will clearly understand, Mr Delors, we are extremely uneasy about the present programme.
Det ligner mere et papir fra en Kommission, der ser sig selv som en overgangskommission, der bare skal passe butikken.
It looks more like a paper from a Commission that sees itself as a transitional Commission that is simply there to mind the shop.
Jeg er bange for, at Kommissionen har ladet sig slå for meget af banen af Rådets negative og tilbageholdende reaktioner på i sig selv yderst gode initiativer fra Kommissionen og dens formand.
I am afraid that the Commission has allowed itself to be too greatly cowed by the negative and aloof reactions of the Council vis-à-vis what are in themselves extremely sound initiatives on the part of the Commission and its President.
Derfor er det i øjeblikket at gå alt for vidt for os at udtale tillid, men jeg håber da, at Kommissionen er i stand til at indløse de ord, som her til aften er udtalt af hr. Delors, i form af et konkret handlingsprogram, og så vil den få vores tillid.
That is why it would be going much too far for us to express our confidence at this moment, but I hope that the Commission will prove able to translate into action the words spoken this morning by Mr Delors. Then it will have our confidence.
Jeg vil nødigt have, at man skal tro, at jeg kneb udenom, da spørgsmålet blev stillet, eller at jeg har foretaget nogen form for forskelsbehandling.
PRESIDENT. — The next item is the continuation of the debate on the presentation of the new Commission and its programme of work.
Der skete imidlertid intet mirakel; det forstår vi, men vi finder det også symptomatisk for den nuværende situation.
The miracle, however, did not happen, which is understandable, but we think that it is also a symptom of the present situation.
FORMANDEN. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er fortsættelsen af forhandlingen om præsentationen af den nye Kommission og forelæggelsen af Kommissionens arbejdsprogram.
MARINHO (S). — (PT) Mr President, there are many things which we would like to say, but which the miserly two minute limit does not allow us. Therefore, I am opting to express a certain state of mind rather than make a political statement.
Kommisssionen er altså også i defensiven lige som resten af Fællesskabet.
The Commission, like the whole of the Community in fact, is also on the defensive.
Den foreslår en medicin, men ikke en ny horisont.
It proposes remedies, but not a new perspective.
Derfor indeholder både programmet og indlæg get alt det, vi kunne forvente, men i virkeligheden intet nyt.
Consequently, both in the programme and in the speech there is everything we could expect, but nothing really new.
Programmet mangler først og fremmest en sjæl, så det kunne give et svar på den europæiske offentlige menings ængstelser og mobilisere tilliden til Europa endnu en gang.
What is missing especially is the additional enthusiasm which would make it possible to answer the anxieties of the European public and mobilize confidence in Europe once more.
Derfor har jeg valgt at give udtryk for en vis sindsstemning i stedet for en politisk erklæring.
Also, the Commission has only two years left to go: it is as if, as well as not having much power, it also has very little time.
Derudover har Kommissionen kun to år foran sig.
I think that this is what is in everyone's minds.
De kommende to årer imidlertid de mest afgørende år for en ny europæisk orden.
However, the next two years will perhaps be the most decisive years of the new European order.
Det er i de kommende to år, denne nye europæiske orden skal fastlægges, og er der noget, vi mangler i den aktuelle situation, er det lederskab og perspektiv.
It is in the next two years that this new European order is going to be decided, and if something is lacking in the present European context, it is leadership and perspective.
Det er i de kommende to år, at Maastricht podningen på Rom-Traktaten vil gro eller visne.
The next two years will tell whether the graft of Maastricht onto the Treaty of Rome will thrive or not.
Vi har i dag en særpræget debat, der tegner et fremtidigt Fællesskabs konturer, et mere demokratisk og mere gennemskueligt Fællesskab, mere tæt på borgerne. Jeg mener ikke, alle tænker sådan.
All in all, this is a simulation of a future which everyone in Parliament and the Commission would have liked to have seen already present, and I think both the Parliament and the Commission regret that it has not yet arrived.
Vi gør det alligevel inden for det, der er muligt, og med de dermed forbundne begrænsninger, og ikke en debat, som vi havde ønsket, det vil sige en normal debat, hvis Maastricht-Traktaten havde været ratificeret, hvilket vi alle — eller i det mindste størstedelen af os her i forsamlingen — havde ønsket.
And, for this very reason, we are witnessing a debate which naturally swings between the imperatives of real ity on the one hand and the idealism of a European project glimpsed momentarily on the other.
Derudover er det Kommissionen, der har monopol på initiativbeføjelserne, og det er den, der plejer at give de impulser, der er mest afgørende for Fællesskabets frem tid.
Besides, it is the Commission which has the monopoly of the power of initiative and it is the Commission which is used to giving the most decisive impulses to the Community's development.
Disse betragtninger kan måske forklare den svage udformning af Kommissionens tekster, de sidste dages og de sidste timers frustration i Europa-Parlamentet og en vis nervøsitet, der prægede denne mødeperiodes start.
In the end, I think we would all like more, but — it must be said — from a legal point of view and from the point of view of the treaties we do not yet have the power and the means to achieve it.
Derfor mener jeg, der mangler en global koncept, og at det nok er den største mangel.
Consequently I think that an overall concept is lacking and that that is perhaps the main failing.
Det indre marked var en succes; men det er kun til dels gennemført, og til dels er det i dag utilstrækkeligt.
The concept of the Single Market was a success, but to some extent it has been achieved and to some extent it is now proving to be insufficient.
Vi har brug for en vision, der fører os lidt længere frem.
Therefore we need an idea which takes us a little bit further forward.
Alt det, jeg har sagt, skal mere opfattes som et incitament end som en kritik.
Everything I have said, how ever, is more of an incentive than a criticism.
Program met og indlægget er mere et udtryk for, at Kommissionen holder sig tilbage i håb om en bedre lejlighed, end det er en sluterklæring.
I think that this programme and this speech can be seen more as a withdrawal on the part of the Commission whilst waiting for a better opportunity than as a final declaration.
Vi ved også, at Kommissionen er Parlamentets og de små landes store allierede.
We also know that the Commission is the major ally of Parliament and of the small countries.
Derfor skal tvivlen komme den til gode.
Therefore, we give it the benefit of the doubt.
Det vil sige: et ja... men i tillidens og stabilitetens navn; de er i dag mere end nogensinde nødvendige for, at denne håbets blomst, som hr. Delors talte om, kan blomstre i fremtiden.
In other words, ours is a yes, but... in the name of the confidence and stability which are now needed more than ever, so that the flower of hope which President Delors talked about can grow in future.
Efter at have hørt hr. Delors' indlæg, har vi dog fået håbet om, at projektet trods alt ikke er tabt, og at det ikke afviger så meget fra den engang definerede retning.
Nevertheless, after President Delors' speech we are left with the hope that, in spite of everything, the project has not been lost and that the course it has traced up to now has not deviated from the initial markers.
Med hr. Delors' indlæg kom der i dag den mundfuld frisk luft ind, som den formelle præsentation af programmet lukke de ud. Og Parlamentet har, som det er sin opgave, lukket op for den.
Today President Delors let in through the window the breath of fresh air which had been shut outside when the programme was formally presented to Parliament.
COLLINS (S). — (EN) Hr. formand jeg må sige, at jeg var noget skuffet, da jeg hørte kommissionsformandens indlæg her til morgen.
The Portuguese socialists, in agreement with the rest of their group, will vote for confidence in the Commission.
Det var en defensiv tale, og tonen blev slået an i de første sætninger, da formanden sagde, at Kommissionen var alles yndlingssyndebuk. Det kan der efter min mening nok være noget sandt i, og jeg kan godt forstå, hvorfor det blev sagt, men jeg tror ikke, jeg ville have indrømmet det så åbent, forjo mere man indrømmer, at man er syndebuk, jo mere sandsynligt er det. at man bliver brugt som sådan.
Not in the form of a blank cheque, but as support for the Commission and particularly for its president to enable it to increase its persistence and support the common ambition of giving Europe a political identity when, in the distressing panorama which surrounds us, Europe is necessary more than ever.
Ikke med en blankocheck med ubegrænset kredit, men med støtte til Kommissionen og navnlig til dens formand, for at styrke deres vedholdenhed og støtte den fælles ambition, som er at give Europa politisk personlighed i en tid, hvor Europa i den trøstesløshed, der omgiver os, er mere nødvendigt end nogensinde før.
It was a defensive speech and the tone was set in the opening sentences when the President said that the Commission was everyone's favourite scapegoat. While I think there is some truth in that and I can understand why it was said, I do not think I would have chosen to admit it because frankly, the more you admit to being a scapegoat, the more likely it is that you will be used as one.
LUCAS PIRES (PPE). — (PT) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, i en situation med politiske og økonomiske spændinger i og uden for Fællesskabet havde Europa-Parlamentet naturligvis forventet, at Kommissionens program og formandens indlæg var noget, der lignede et mirakel.
LUCAS PIRES (PPE). — (PT) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the European Parliament, faced with a situation of political and economic tensions inside and outside the Community, certainly hoped that the Commission's programme and the speech of its president would amount to a miracle.
Vi er vant til af kommisssionsformanden at forvente en atitude som en Hercules, der går gennem Parlamentets og
We are used to expecting the president of the Commission to act like a Hercules who passes through the pillars of Parliament and the Council and who this time also had to pass through the pillars of recession and anxiety about Maastricht, building a new vision of Europe on the same scale as the earlier, now historic idea
Det eren skam, at Fællesskabet i almindelighed i øjeblik ket forskanser og forsvarer sig.
It is a pity that the Community in general, at the moment, should be retrenching and defending itself.
Den bedste form for forsvar er et angreb.
The best form of defence is attack.
Vi burde se os om efter en stor idé.
We ought to be looking for a big idea.
Jeg kiggede Kommissionens program igennem, og jeg kan slet ikke få øje på nogen idé — slet ikke nogen stor idé.
I looked through the Commission programme and I do not see any idea at all — certainly not a big one.
Den store idé i 1980'erne var gennemførelsen af det indre marked.
The big idea of the 1980s was the completion of the internal market.
Det så ud til at virke og at appellere til fantasien: fri bevægelighed, fri etableringsret, frihed til at købe og sælge, til at producere og så videre.
That appeared to work and capture the imagination: freedom of movement, freedom of establishment, freedom to buy and sell, to produce and so on.
Men det var
But it was not a very social Community that we produced. Therein