natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I betragtning af nærværende beslutningsforslag ville det måske være en god ide at puste nyt liv i disse møder og afholde dem med mere regelmæssige mel lemrum.
I think it is a very encouraging thing that national governments attach a significant level of importance to the issue of animal welfare and that they are prepared to do that in the IGC.
På dette område tager man ofte stilling sektor for sektor, ikke på grund af manglende interesse, men fordi de store problemområder er så vidt forskellige, hvis man overvejer ikke blot filosofien, der ligger bag, men også hvad der rent faktisk skal gøres. Lovgivning til at beskytte dyr i intensivt landbrug ville være højst uegnet til at takle problemer forbundet med vilde dyr.
A sector by sector approach is most often taken in this subject, not because of lack of concern but because the major problem areas, if one considers not just the philosophy but what should actually be done, are so very different.
Men én ting er sikkert.
However, one thing is certain.
Der går en rød tråd gennem alle disse aktiviteter og gennem denne betænkning, og det er, at dyr fortjener at blive behandlet humant, hvor de end er, og under hvilke omstændigheder de end lever.
A common thread runs through all these activities and through the present report, and that is that animals deserve to be treated humanely wherever they are and whatever their circumstances.
Grove misgerninger med overlagt og unødvendig ondskab kan ikke længere tolereres i det 20. århundrede, og hvis Parlamentet videregiver denne besked klart til hele Europa, vil det gøre alle en stor tjeneste.
Gross acts of deliberate and unnecessary cruelty can no longer be tolerated in the 20th century, and if this House gives that message out clearly to the whole of Europe it will be doing a great service.
Lad mig endelig sige noget om punkt 3 i beslutnings forslaget.
I do believe that the consciousness and awareness of the need for action is growing.
Dette mener jeg er af altoverskyggende betydning for fremtiden. Som Parlamentet ved, ved tog regeringskonferencen i Maastricht en erklæring om dyrs velfærd som et bilag til traktaten.
I think Parliament has played a very significant role in achieving that result and this report, this debate and this consideration of the matter will add to that.
Jeg synes, det er meget opmuntrende, at nationale regeringer tillægger spørgsmålet om dyrebeskyttelse betydelig vægt, og at de er villige til at gøre det i regeringskonferencen.
The Commission cannot take either of those viewpoints but it can support a sensible process of education, sensible legislation, based upon that middle ground of respect for the rights of animals together with an understanding of the realities of nature and a determination that human beings should take a humane approach to all for whom they have any responsibility.
Jeg tror, at bevidstheden om og opmærksomheden på behovet for handling vokser.
LANE (RDE). — Mr President, I rise under Rule 103.
Jeg synes, Parlamentet har spillet en meget afgørende rolle for at opnå dette resultat, og denne betænkning, denne forhandling og denne overvejelse af emnet vil øge denne bevidsthed.
But first I should like to thank the Commissioner for his excellent summary of the situation. Nobody can tolerate gross acts of cruelty to animals.
I årene siden vedtagelsen af den første EF-lovgiv-ning om dyrenes velfærd i 1984, har Fællesskabet vedtaget mere end 15 love på områder så forskellige som eksperimenter, landbrug og dyrelivet, og mange flere forslag står i øjeblikket til forhandling.
Over the years, since the adoption of the first EEC legislation on animal welfare in 1984, the Community has adopted over 15 pieces of legislation in areas as diverse as experimentation, farming and wild life, and many more proposals are currently under discussion.
Jeg mener, at det har skabt et godt grundlag for dyre beskyttelse i hele Fællesskabet og et, som vi fortsat kan og skal bygge på.
I think that has created a sound basis for animal protection throughout the Community and one on which we can and must continually build.
Men lovgivning er ikke nok i sig selv, og på dette område mere end på de fleste andre områder bør man ikke undervurdere den forbilledlige og belærende virkning af en parlamentsforhandling.
However, legislative action alone is not enough and in this area perhaps more than most the demonstrative and educative effect of parliamentary debate should not be underestimated.
Meget afhænger af menneskers indstilling til dyr.
Much depends on the attitudes of people towards animals.
En budgetpost for støtte til europæiske dyrebeskyttelsesorganisationer, som blev vedtaget i Parlamentet i 1986, har spillet en betydelig rolle med hensyn til at øge bevidstheden og uddanne befolkningen.
A budget line on subsidies to European animal welfare organizations voted in by this Parliament in 1986 has had a major role to play in raising awareness and in the education of the general public.
Indtil nu har Kommissionen medvirket til at financière mere end 50 projekter fra kampagner mod at efterlade kæledyr i Spanien til undervisningssæt til skoler i Irland.
To date over 50 projects ranging from pet abandonment campaigns in Spain to educational kits for primary schools in Ireland have been co-funded by the Commission.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
The first point calls for a report on the state of animals.
Lane (RDE). — (EN) Hr. formand, til forretningsordenen under henvisning til artikel 103.
LANE (RDE). — Mr President, this was already mentioned in the House today.
Men først vil jeg gerne takke kommissæren for hans udmærkede opsummering af situationen.
The chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural De velopment stated in the House that he was not consulted on this matter.
Men jeg mener altså, at det er muligt at fremsætte en sådan anmodning både under fastlæggelse af ugens dagsorden og under forhandlingen inden afstemningen.
You are invoking Rule 103 and demanding that the report should be referred to the committee.
Men jeg vil gerne bede Dem undersøge dette.
However, a similar objection was raised this afternoon, and it was rejected.
Det er klart, at kollegaen kan anmode om udsættelse af afstemningen, men dette er en anden sag.
In accordance, then, with Rule 103(5), no similar objection can again be raised during the same partsession.
Men jeg vil altså bede Dem undersøge spørgsmålet, hr. formand.
The reason why it was raised has no bearing.
Men vi taler hovedsageligt om husdyr.
So a debate is held in which, naturally, new elements may emerge.
Efter min opfattelse hører dette ind under Udvalget om Land brug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter.
The issue then is thus not the setting of the agenda and referral back to committee, but those elements which have emerged from the debate and which cause members to doubt whether this report is correct and being properly dealt with.
Derfor vil jeg gerne foreslå, at denne betænkning i overens stemmelse med 103 henvises til Landbrugsudvalget.
The italicized sections of Rule 103, paragraph 5 say ·— and Mrs Aglietta and Mr Amendola might perhaps read them — that a new report can be tabled to include those elements, but then Rule 105 can always be invoked, of course, which means that the debate is adjourned.
Hvis vi accepterer denne tolkning, så kan vi sætte anmodningen under afstemning.
PRESIDENT. — (GR) Mr Wijsenbeek, is that your view as chairman of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure ?
Aglietta (V). — (IT) Undskyld, hr. formand, jeg vil blot kommentere min kollegas anmodning om hen visning til artikel 103 i forretningsordenen.
CHANTERIE (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, I agree with you that a motion cannot be tabled twice, but I would make another request, namely that this report be referred back to the committee responsible so that it can incorporate the points made in today's debate.
En sådan anmodning er allerede blevet gjort til genstand for en afstemning en gang i dag.
During this debate the Commission too has mentioned a number of elements which need to be reconsidered, more specifically in regard to the decisions taken at Maastricht.
Denne anmodning kan således ikke fastlægges igen.
Instead of asking the Committee on Agriculture for its opinion I thus propose that the motion be referred back to the committee responsible.
Hvad angår det spørgsmål, som hr. Chanterie rejste under mødet i eftermiddags, skal jeg gøre opmærksom på, at der ikke var tale om henvisning til Landbrugsudvalget, men om henvisning til det kom petente udvalg.
WIJSENBEEK (LDR), Chairman of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities. — (NL) Mr President, I am giving an interpretation of the Rules of Procedure as I understand them, and I have rather more to do with them than a lot of other members.
Så det er nøjagtig samme anmodning. ning.
At this plenary I naturally speak as a member just like any other, but I have made a more detailed study of the Rules.
Lane (RDE). — (EN) Hr. formand, dette er allerede blevet nævnt her i Parlamentet i dag.
CHANTERIE (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, I wish to invoke that Rule.
Formanden for Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter sagde, at han ikke var blevet spurgt om sagen.
In setting the agenda as such we did not want the report referred back to the committee responsible; we suggested that the Committee on Agriculture should be asked to prepare an opinion.
Jeg taler som næstformand i Landbrugsudvalget for at insistere på, at man anvender artikel 103 stk. 5, og at betænkningen henvises til Land brugsudvalget.
We asked not for referral back to the Committee on the Environment, but for an opinion from the Committee on Agriculture. That was when the agenda was being set.
Wijsenbeek (LDR), formand for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet. — (NL) Hr. formand, De har naturligvis ret, for formanden for et udvalg har altid ret og en formand for et møde har endnu mere ret.
ANASTASSOPOULOS (PPE). — (GR) Mr President, if I remember rightly, but please confirm it as well, a motion for referral back to committee may be tabled during the fixing of the week's agenda and can also be tabled during the debate and at any time until voting takes place.
De henviser til artikel 103 og anmoder om henvisning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling.
However, I think it may be tabled either during the fixing of the agenda, or during the debate, any time between the announcement of the item and just before the vote.
Men samme anmodning blev fremsat i efter middags.
I would like to ask you to look into this yourself.
Men i henhold til artikel 103, stk. 5, kan et sådant forslag ikke genfremsættes under samme for handling.
Of course, our colleague could call for a postponement of the vote and that would constitute a completely different motion.
Og det er uden betydning, hvem der fremsætter forslaget.
But I would like to ask you, Mr President, to consider the matter and pronounce upon it.
Der står ganske tydeligt i artikel 103, stk. 5, at en betænkning ikke kan sendes tilbage, hvis en anmodning om fornyet udvalgsbehandling er fremsat ved fastsættelsen af dagsordenen.
I now table another motion, for referral of the report to committee, because new elements have emerged in the course of the debate.
Chanterie (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg kan følge Dem, når De siger, at man ikke kan fremsætte det samme forslag for anden gang, men jeg ville gerne foreslå noget andet, nemlig at henvise denne betænkning til fornyet behandling i det kompetente udvalg for at sætte dette i stand til at tage hensyn til den drøftelse, som har fundet sted.
PRESIDENT. — (GR) Mr Anastassopoulos, Rule 103(5) states that: 'if a motion requesting referral back to committee is rejected, it shall not be tabled again during that debate'.
Under denne drøftelse har navnlig Kommissionen gjort opmærksom på, at en række elementer på ny skal tages i øjesyn, nærmere bestemt også for så vidt angår Maastricht-beslutningen.
Of course, you are arguing that it is not during the same debate, but that it was tabled during the fixing of the agenda and is now being tabled during this debate.
I stedet for forslaget om at rådføre sig med Landbrugsudvalget foreslår jeg således, at forslaget sendes tilbage til fornyet behandling i det kompetente udvalg.
I think that if we accept such an interpretation, we can put the motion to the vote.
Formanden. — Hr. Wijsenbeek, taler De nu i Deres egenskab som formand for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen? ningsordenen?
Furthermore, concerning the matter raised by Mr Chanterie during the afternoon sitting, I will remind you once more that it was not a question of referral back to the Committee on Agriculture, but to the committee responsible. Consequently, it is the identical motion.
Wijsenbeek (LDR), formand for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet. — Hr. formand, jeg giver her en udlægning af forretningsordenen, således som jeg ser den, og jeg har noget mere med den at gøre end mange
For these reasons I propose that the report be referred back to the Committee on the Environment.
Artikel 103 kan ikke fortolkes anderledes.
The motion for referral back to committee was tabled again.
Jeg vil derfor anmode formanden om at afslutte spørgsmålet, for jeg tror, at der på nuværende tidspunkt ikke er andet at gøre.
Consequently, the issue was decided during the afternoon's debate.
andre medlemmer.
There was no question of transfer to a different agenda.
Når forhandlingen har fundet sted, kan der imidlertid være frem kommet nye elementer, og så kan artikel 105 stadig altid anvendes.
I consider that the motion cannot be tabled again., You may table it during tomorrow's vote, but not today, because I believe that in accordance with Rule 74 as well, the decision taken earlier applies.
Anastassopoulos (PPE). — (GR) Hr. formand, jeg tror, jeg kan hjælpe Dem, hvis De tillader det.
PRESIDENT. — The debate is closed.
Chanterie (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg påberåber mig samme artikel.
AGLIETTA (V). — (IT) — Mr President, I can understand that some people want at all cost to be right, even in regard to a Rule of Procedure that is very clear : political passion will even do this.
Ved fastsættelsen af dagsordenen som sådan ønskede vi ikke at henvise betænkningen til fornyet behandling i det kompetente udvalg, men foreslog at lade Landbrugsudvalget udarbejde en udtalelse.
I must however say to Mr Chanterie that you cannot shamelessly assert things that are not true : this afternoon the request to postpone the debate was explained in the same identical terms as those he used a moment ago.
Der blev ikke anmodet om henvisning til fornyet behandling i Miljøudvalget, men om en udtalelse fra Landbrugsudvalget.
That is what was said, even though it is not entirely correct since, at least in part, the Committee on Agriculture did express an opinion.
Det var ved fastsættelsen af dagsordenen.
The request was debated fully — with one speech in favour and one against — discussed, assessed by the Assembly and then rejected.
Formanden. — Men der er også artikel 74, stk. 2, som siger: »Forkastes et forslag om ændring af dagsordenen, kan det ikke genfremsættes i samme mødeperiode«.
Under the terms of paragraph 5, Rule 103, which permits of no possible subjective or variable interpretation, the question is clear: when a reference back has been requested, explained and rejected, a second request for such reference back cannot be presented during the same debate. And there's an end of it.
Eftersom forslaget om ændring af dagsordenen forkastedes, kan vi altså på grundlag af artikel 74 fastslå, at forslaget ikke kan fremsættes på ny.
Rule 103 cannot be interpreted in any other way. I therefore ask the President to close the matter now, since I think that, at this point, there is nothing else to be done.
Anastassopoulos (PPE). — Hr. formand, dette er et meget interessant spørgsmål.
PRESIDENT. — The next item is the report (Doc.
I samme artikel 74, stk. 2, som De henviste til, står der: »Når dagsordenen er godkendt, kan den kun ændres i henhold til bestemmelserne i artikel 75 og 102-106 eller efter forslag fra formanden.« Det vil sige, at artikel 103 staigdvæk vil kunne anvendes.
A326/92) by Mr Bourlanges, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism, on the modification of a proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM (90) 0540 final —Doc.
Men jeg vil følge Deres afgørelse.
C3-0168/91), for a directive on the charging of transport infrastructure costs to heavy goods vehicles.
Af denne grund ville jeg også gerne appellere til ordføreren.
ANASTASSOPOULOS (PPE). — (GR) Mr President, if I may be allowed, I would like to help your thinking because it was I who asked you to look into the matter yourself.
Hvis denne har fulgt forhandlingen, vil han forstå, at der er behov for på ny at tale med hinanden.
Rule 103(1) states the following, in small print: 'Application of Rule 40(2) does not preclude a request for referral back to committee pursuant to Rule 103'.
Jeg beder ham være så beredvillig at fuldstændiggøre denne forhandling i Miljøudvalget.
PRESIDENT. — (GR) But there is also Rule 74(2), which states that : 'If a procedural motion to amend the agenda is rejected, it shall not be tabled again during the same part-session'.
Derfor foreslår jeg, at betænkningen henvises til fornyet behandling i Miljøudvalget.
Consequently, on the basis of Rule 74 as well, since the motion to amend the agenda to preclude any debate on the matter was rejected, we can take it that the motion cannot be tabled again during the same partsession.
Lane (RDE). — (EN) Hr. formand, hvad enten De anvender artikel 74, artikel 75 eller artikel 103 stk. 5, har De stadig en mulighed for at sætte det til afstemning.
BOURLANGES (PPE), rapporteur. — (FR) Mr President, this report or at least its subject-matter is relatively complex.
Man kan ikke med hjemmel i forretningsordenen sige, at når vi taler om den dagsorden, der allerede er blevet forelagt, kan en henvisning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling ikke sættes til afstem ning.
The Commission has brought forward a modified version of its initial proposal, which had met with resolute opposition from the Council.
Jeg tror, at De som formand for parlamentet i henhold til en hvilken som helst af de tre artikler har ret til at sætte det til afstemning, om vi kan forlange en fornyet udvalgsbehandling eller ej, jeg vil bede Dem om at benytte Dem af Deres rettigheder dertil.
This proposal on the charging of transport infrastructure costs to certain goods vehicles contains a series of relatively important items. In particular, it makes provision for the introduction of a harmonized vehicle tax to replace national taxes.
Vær venlig at overlade det til Parlamentet.
A certain structure is proposed for this tax, with minimum rates which would evolve over time.
Aglietta (V). — (IT) Hr. formand, jeg kan forstå, at nogle for enhver pris vil have ret endog over en forretningsorden, som er meget klar: Dette er også et udslag af politisk passion.
ANASTASSOPOULOS (PPE). — (GR) Mr President, this is a very interesting subject.
Men jeg må sige til hr. Chanterie, at man ikke skamløst kan påstå usandheder: I eftermiddag blev anmodningen om udsættelse af forhandlingen begrundet på nøjagtigt samme måde, som han gjorde for et øjeblik siden.
In the same place to which you referred, Rule 74(2), it is stated that: 'Once adopted, the agenda shall not be amended except in application of Rules 75 and 102 to 106 or on a proposal by the President'.
Vi har derfor allerede haft en anmodning om fornyet udvalgsbehandling i Miljøudvalget i overensstemmelse med artikel 103.
Consequently, Rule 103 exceptionally allows amendment.
Begrundelsen var, at der manglede en udtalelse — således blev der sagt, også selv om det slet ikke er rigtigt, fordi der i hvert fald til dels har været en udtalelse — fra Landbrugsudvalget.
I say that for your information, Mr President, but will comply with your decision.
Anmodningen er blevet forhandlet indgående — med én taler for og én imod — debatteret, vurderet af Parlamentet og derefter afvist.
During an initial phase, there would be a minimum level of charging on the basis of relatively low rates.
Ifølge artikel 103 stk. 5, som ikke muliggør subjektive eller variable fortolkninger, er spørgsmålet klart: når man har haft en anmodning om fornyet udvalgsbehandling, begrundet og afvist, kan der ikke fremsættes en anden i løbet af samme forhandling. Punktum
The second phase would see the introduction of a more comprehensive concept of costs, including in particular what are known as external costs or pollution costs.
Formanden. — Kære kolleger, jeg vil gerne gøre opmærksom på, at der under fastlæggelsen af dags ordenen ikke var tale om at tage sagen af dagsordenen og udsætte den til en senere mødeperiode.
The proposal also gives States the option to reimburse road hauliers a proportion of their tax according to the percentage of their mileage that is done on toll motorway networks.
Der var ikke tale om en ændring af dagsordenen. Der blev fremsat forslag om henvisning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling.
LANE (RDE). — Mr President, whether you apply Rule 74, Rule 75 or Rule 103(5), you still have the option of calling for a vote on this.
Dette spørgsmål blev således afklaret i eftermiddags. Der blev ikke anmodet om udsættelse til et senere tidspunkt.
There is nothing steadfast in the Rules which says that when we are talking about the agenda being fixed there cannot be a vote on referral back to committee.
Formanden endnu en gang.
BOURLANGES motorways.
Der kan stilles forslag herom i morgen under afstemningen, men ikke i dag, for efter min mening gælder den beslutning, der blev truffet tidligere i henhold til artikel 74.
To simplify, it can be said that some States rely mainly on tolls to pay for motorways and charge road hauliers relatively low rates of vehicle tax, while others do the opposite, charging hauliers very high taxes and no tolls on motorways.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok.
ANASTASSOPOULOS (PPE). — (GR) Mr President, I am not usually in favour of postponements.
A3-26/92) af Bourlanges for Udvalget om Transport og Turisme om forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet (KOM(90) 540 endel. — dok.
But I must confess that Mr Bourlanges's arguments seem very persuasive.
C3-168/91) til direktiv om opkrævning af afgifter på tunge lastvogne med henblik på dækning af transportinfrastrukturomkostningerne. strukturomkostningerne.
And I believe, Mr President, that you yourself could specify a deadline of one or two months for the report to be brought back to the House with the validity Mr Bourlanges has intimated, so that our work will not be delayed.
kører i områder, der anvender dette system. Omvendt er der andre, der både nyder godt af lave afgifter i hjemlandet og af gratis motorveje i udlandet. Det er denne situation, som Kommissionens forslag vil imødegå.
This, as you will readily appreciate, results in significant distortions of competition, since some hauliers have to pay twice over, first in the form of high taxes and secondly in the form of tolls when operating in countries where they are charged, while others get the benefit of low taxes in their own country and toll-free use of roads in the others.
Den forelagte betænkning fjerner sig på væsentlige punkter stærkt fra kommissionsforslaget.
The report before the House differs very substantially from the Commission's proposal on some important aspects.