natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
SANDBÆK lemmer fra de små lande alene af sproglige grunde skal være afskåret fra at deltage i beslutningerne.
VAN DER WAAL respect of this question and I am also glad to note this problem received some attention in the explanations of vote, for in the debate itself it received scant heed.
Men det er nu kun én af mange grunde til, at vi stemmer nej til hr. Hänsch' betænkning.
Only in two speeches was the language problem referred to!
betænkningen pä grund af selve den måde, hvorpå han forestiller sig det store Europa.
would not subscribe to these goals?
Jeg tror, man begår en fejl ved at drømme om denne store konføderation.
But how credible do they sound?
Den vil være en meget kompliceret, meget tung indretning.
For a long time Europe 1992 was the land of promise.
Jeg synes, den er et veritabelt monstrum, og det netop nu, hvor man tværtimod burde prøve at forenkle Europas nye opbygning.
It is now being suggested that to that end we need an order that comprises all of Europe.
Hvad skal denne føderation være for en størrelse?
Let there be no misunderstanding about this.
Jeg må indrømme, at jeg intet har forstået.
Or have we already forgotten those lessons our citizens gave us?
Jeg vil geme tilføje, at dette ikke har noget at gøre med min store respekt for og påskønnelse af hr. Hänsch, og jeg mener, at hans betænkning fra et intellektuelt synspunkt er yderst stimulerende.
SANDBÆK (ARC). — (DA) — Madam President, in the time there is available, I must concentrate on one point in the Hänsch report, namely that of limiting the choice of languages.
CANAVARRO (ARC), skriftlig. — (PT) Parlamentets initiativbetænkning, udarbejdet af hr. Hänsch, som jeg takker for hans engagerede arbejde på dette område, er ganske vist en fremtidsstudie, men også en nødvendig provokation for at advare vore ledere og kolleger om nødvendigheden af at tage stilling til de vanskeligheder, der melder sig med udvidelsen af Fællesskabet, førend de med Fællesakten opnåede resultater endnu er fordøjet, for slet ikke at tale om den endnu ikke ratificerede Maastricht-Traktats revision af denne.
ALAVANOS (CG). — (GR) Madam President, I think the Hänsch report would have some value, not if it achieved a majority in the European Parliament, but if it could unite the forces present here and not create new reservations and concerns. And I think that despite the improvements that have been made along the way, concerns and reservations on the part of the small countries persist.
Først når dette er sket, kan en eventuel reform af institutionerne komme på tale.
Particularly about the issue of language, but in connection with other institutional changes as well, such as the Presidency.
THYSSEN (PPE). — (NL) Fru formand, i forhandlingen her i eftermiddag har jeg opfordret medlemmerne til endnu en gang nøje at tænke over sprogpunktet, og jeg har stillet dem enkelte spørgsmål om det.
The idea of being able to express oneself in one's own language, but of not being able to hear what other people say translated into one's own language, is ridiculous.
Jeg konstaterer nu, at hr. Hänsch og andre i allersidste øjeblik alligevel har vist sig parate til at ændre den passus med arbejdssprogene grundlæggende og også at vedtage det på opfordring af mig stillede ændringsforslag.
This thought can only occur in the minds of people who only consider important what they themselves say, and who find it not worth the effort to listen to others.
Det udtrykkelige spørgsmål om en begrænsning af det nuværende antal arbejdssprog er dermed bortfaldet.
For it has surely not occurred to anyone to exclude candidates with poor language skills from standing as European Members of Parliament?
Jeg er taknemlig for det, for det tillader mig at stemme sammen med min gruppe og støtte betænkningen.
Politics are about dialogue, and that can only be conducted if one fully understands what other people are saying.
Men jeg forbliver på vagt i denne sag, og jeg er også glad for at konstatere, at det problem blev viet opmærksomhed i stemmeforklaringerne, for på det område så det kummerligt ud i forhandlingen.
It is also completely unacceptable that Members of Parliament who have one of the four principle languages as their mother tongue, should have full opportunity of under standing what the debates in Parliament are about, whilst Members from the smaller countries, purely on linguistic grounds, should be excluded from participating in the decisions.
Kun i to indlæg blev der talt om sprogproblemet!
But that is only one of the many reasons why we are voting against Mr Hänsch's report.
ALAVANOS (CG). —(GR) Fru formand, jeg tror, at Hanschbetænkningen kunne have en vis værdi, ikke hvis den samlede et flertal i Europa-Parlamentet, men hvis den kunne samle de kræfter, der er til stede her, i stedet for at skabe nye forbehold og bekymringer.
We have the Council of Europe, we have the Community, we have asked that the Community as such should join the Council of Europe and the CSCE — and I am all for that, I voted in favour.
Og trods de forbedringer, der er sket undervejs, tror jeg, at de små landes bekymringer og forbehold stadig er til stede.
What will this confederation look like?
Et lands sprog -og det bør ordføreren vide- er ikke et simpelt redskab til kommunikation, men udtryk for landets kultur og identitet.
Our citizens already have trouble finding their way around the European institutions, and if we complicate things even further there is no chance that they will ever accept the European idea and give us their support.
Da denne betænkning bør blive indledningen til langvarige overvejelser, der også skal omfatte offentligheden, dvs. de europæiske borgere, og ikke betragtes som et endeligt forslag, vil jeg afholde mig fra at stemme ved den endelige afstemning.
BEIRÔCO (PPE). — (PT) Madam President, I am going to vote against the Hänsch report for two reasons: firstly, because I think that this report is inappropriate at a time when the entry into force of the Maastricht Treaty, and still less its full implementation, is by no means guaranteed; secondly, because since a future Community of 20 or 25 members can certainly not function with the current institutional model, the solution, in my opinion, is to move towards a federal type model and not a model which, since it is still inter-governmental, goes against the principle of the equality of the Member States.
DILLEN (DR), skriftlig. — (NL) Tilvejebringelse af europæisk enhed i dets frie folkeslags forskellighed og gennem disse frie folkeslags samarbejde er værd at følge og værd at efterstræbe.
I should like to add that this has nothing to do with my enormous regard for my colleague, Mr Hänsch, and I think that from an intellectual point of view his report is very stimulating.
Ud fra denne betragtning tror jeg, vi vil have svært ved at acceptere den amerikanske model og tro eller acceptere, at de sprog, som vi repræsentanter for de mindste lande taler, skal lide samme skæbne som indianernes sprog i Amerika.
CANAVARRO (ARC), in writing. — (PT) This Parliament's own-initiative report, the author of which is Mr Hänsch, whom I would like to congratulate on his diligent work, is a ripple on the surface, an exercise in futurology, but also a necessary warning to our leaders and all our colleagues to start to be aware of the difficulties which are looming with enlargement, when the patrimony of the Single Act and the revision of Maastricht — which has not been ratified — have not had time to settle.
På denne baggrund mener jeg, at der er mange ting i Hansch-betænkningen, der bør rettes, og derfor vil jeg stemme imod den.
Only then can we proceed with a possible reform of the institutions.
Jeg vil gerne sige, at jeg gør hans grunde til mine.
The express demand fora limitation of the present number of working languages has in consequence been dropped.
Jeg vil dog føje én til, og det beder jeg hr. Hänsch undskylde, men det er en grund, der ikke har at gøre med betimelighed, men med substans.
I am grateful for this since it allows me to vote with my group and to support this report.
Jeg er absolut ikke enig i og kan ikke stemme for
But I shall certainly remain alert in
europæiske teater henvises de til de dårligste, mindreværdigste pladser.
Also the question of languages will certainly be an obstacle, both to enlargement and to the necessary institutional reorganization, and there could even be signs in this report of less respect for the least-spoken languages in the Community.
De samme tendenser hindrer imidlertid ikke betænkningen i at formulere ønsket om, at den nuværende situation, hvor Fællesskabet underkaster sig De Forenede Stater, bevares og fortsættes, idet USA anmodes om at deltage »fra sag til sag« i samarbejdsordningen i Europa.
Nevertheless, I feel satisfied that this Parliament has recognized that making the Community or the European Union more solid involves exercising the principle of subsidiarity to the full, developing economic and social cohesion and recognizing the role of national minorities.
Det ville blive de små europæiske folks lod i forventning om, at de store folkeslag så igen efter tur ville begynde at trættes, kives og rende og slås for at få afgjort, hvem der skulle være den største Big Brother.
EPHREMIDIS (CG), in writing. — (GR) Madam President, the Hänsch report is a characteristic example of the Community's centralizing, anti-populist and expansion ist policy in the future that Maastricht has prepared for it.
Forslagene til udformningen af en ny institutionel ram me, som vil være nødvendig efter Fællesskabets udvidelse, med ophævelsen af rotationsordningen for formand skabet med det helt klare mål, at formandskabet kun varetages af de store lande, og med forsøget på at fjerne de små landes sprog, bekræfter vor frygt for et Fælles skab, hvor kun de store og de stærke har ordet.
It casts aside the cloak that perhaps still concealed from some the Community Directorate's intentions, and plain ly proclaims the prevailing Community view that equality is an obstacle to the development of Europe.
Endelig fremmer denne betænkning militariseringen af EF med inddragelsen af Den Vesteuropæiske Union, samtidig med at den udpeger NATO, denne aggressive organisation, der leder efter sin eksistensberettigelse, til Europas sikkerhedsmyndighed i stedet for at fremme freden og nedrustningen.
It proposes not just acceptance, but the adoption of institutional measures to establish a Europe of two or even more speeds, with discrimination against the small er countries and the weaker economies, while calling for "unrestricted" and "unlimited" acceptance of things as they are in the Community by countries applying for accession.
Derfor vil vi stemme imod betænkningen.
Whether this cause is served by the Maastricht Treaty is not to be doubted but denied.
Komme sig, nuvel, resultatet ville tværtimod blive det modsatte. Hvis der i morgen skal gennemføres en sand, en ægte europæisk orden for et sandt og ægte og sundt og levende Europa, så vil der stadig være tale om befolkningsmæssigt store og befolkningsmæssigt små folk, men er de alle ligeværdige, har de alle den samme kvalitative værdi, det samme format.
We believe that those who support the view of the Community as an "economic bastion" against the Third World countries, have found their most ardent supporter who is at the same time reinforcing the Community's attempt to dominate Europe and the wider area around it, and to subjugate third countries, when he states that associated countries should "participate" in the sectors of external policy and defence, but excludes participation in the economic sector.
Der hverken kan eller må være tale om blot den ringeste, den allermindste forskel i behandlingen af befolknings mæssigt store eller små folk og sprog.
Whether it is served by the institution of an order comprising all of Europe in accordance with the Hänsch guidelines is likewise not to be doubted but, quite simply, denied.
Befolkningerne ikke kun i Danmark, men i alle medlemslandene har reageret over for EF-systemets mangler.
Yes, one's flesh creeps at the thought that such a European order could become reality.
Befolkningerne har imidlertid ikke været enige med denne betænkning om, hvori disse mangler bestod.
It would be an order no whit better than the notorious international order of the Americans.
EPHREMIDIS (CG), skriftlig. — (GR) Hr. formand, Hanschbetænkningen er et typisk tegn på Fællesskabets centralistiske, befolkningsfjendtlige og ekspansive politik i den fremtid, der tegnes af Maastricht-Traktaten.
This dominant trend does not. however, impede expression of the desire to further and establish the Community's subjugation to the USA. which is called upon to participate "according to the circumstances" in the System for European Cooperation.
Den trækker flere af EF-ledelsens skjulte hensigter frem i lyset og udtrykker uden omsvøm den herskende EF-holdning, at lighed er en hindring for Europas udvikling.
That would be the fate of the small European nations until such time as the big nations started quarrelling and scuffling and brawling again with one another to determine who should be the Biggest Brother of all.
Afstemningen om betænkningen falder paradoksalt nok på samme dag, som vi har lyttet til det danske formand skabs planer om udmøntningen af principperne om nær hed og åbenhed. Hvis det havde stået til betænkningen skulle Danmark slet ikke have formandskabet, og det ville formentlig heller ikke være tilladt at tale dansk i Europa-Parlamentet — og da slet ikke hvis talen skulle falde på øget demokratisering.
The proposals for modifying the new institutional frame work as necessary once the Community has been enlarged, involve abolishing the rotation of the Community's Presidency between all the Member States.with the clear intention that it should only be exercised by the large countries.
For at EF kan være beslutningsdygtigt, kræver det opbakning i befolkningerne — det burde enhver, der tænker over Europas fremtid, have erkendt på nuværende tidspunkt!
This, together with the attempt to do away with the languages of smaller countries, confirms our fears about a Community in which only the large and powerful will have a say.
Den foreslår ikke blot accept, men også vedtagelse af institutionelle foranstaltninger til konsolidering af et Europa i to eller flere hastigheder, diskrimination af de mindste lande og de svageste økonomier, samtidig med at den af lande, der søger optagelse, kræver »fuld« og »grænseløs« overtagelse af de resultater, der er opnået i Fællesskabet.
Who would have suspected for a minute that here in this European Parliament, in the person of a German Socialist and under the cover of what is called a European order, the slogan "am deutschen Wesen soll die Welt genesen" would turn up in the form of "am deutschen Wesen soll Europa genesen"?
Betænkningen giver kun fornyet næring til dette skræmmebillede.
For these reasons we will vote against the report.
LULLING (PPE), skriftlig. — (DE) Hvis der nogensinde hér i Parlamentet er udarbejdet en forkert betænkning på det forkerte tidspunkt, så er det betænkningen fra Det Institutionelle Udvalg om udformningen af Den Europæiske Union, strategien for dens udvidelse og dannelsen af et helhedsperspektiv på europæisk plan.
JENSEN, RØNN and BLAK (S), in writing. — Hänsch. in what is otherwise a very disagreeable report, makes an accurate observation in point 17: "do not consider the treaty on European Union, signed on 7 February 1992 in Maastricht, as being sufficient to enable the Union in institutional and political terms to meet the new challenges adequately, and in particular admit more new
Tendenserne til et sådant generelt overherredømme ses også af den kendsgerning, at Europa betragtes, som var
There cannot and may not be any question of even the smallest, the tiniest difference in treatment as between the numerically largest and smallest nations and languages.
Ligeledes forslagene vedrørende Kommissionen er uantagelige for små lande.
People not only in Denmark, but in every Member State, have reacted against the faults in the EC system.
For hvilken medbestemmelsesret skal de mindre stater have i Kommissionen, når de ikke råder over en kommissær som talerør?
They have, however, not shared this report's assessment of where these faults lay.
En repræsentant i et højt kommissionsembede som trøst for den eliminere de kommissærpost kan aldrig retfærdiggøre den nødven dige påvirkning fra de små landes side på Kommissionens beslutninger.
Whilst people are looking for closeness, openness and a general strengthening of EC democracy, the report is proposing increased centralization, less transparency and a real abdication of democrat ic rules of play.
Bortset fra at den jubel-føderalisme, som der hér slås til lyd for i denne betænkning, netop inden Danmarks og Storbritanniens ratifikation af Maastricht-Traktaten lige frem kan gå hen og få den modsatte virkning, vil overvejelserne vedrørende de mindre medlemsstaters rolle og position, navnlig i Ministerrådet og Kommissionen, næppe heller anspore den offentlige opinion i disse lande til Europa-begejstring.
MARINHO (S), in writing. — (PT) Even though the Portuguese members of the Socialist Group voted for most of the amendments and the original text, they cannot vote for the report as a whole because, although it helps to open the debate on the institutional consequences of enlargement, the report a) is inappropriate before the ratification process has been concluded; b) does not guarantee the least-populated states equality in exercising the presidency of the Council, a minimum number of commissioners corresponding to one per Member State, or guarantee the Community patrimony on the matter of official languages.
Af de anførte årsager foretrækker jeg hr. Lagakos' ændringsforslag (til artikel 21 og 22) frem for de øvrige synspunkter.
It is a capital error to think that the EC can improve its decision making abilities with fewer languages, abandonment of the rotating presidency and greater powers for the Commission.
For en Europæisk Union, der ikke garanterer en passende repræsentation for alle medlemmer — også de små lande — er med sikkerhed ikke noget virkeligt demokrati!
For the EC to improve its decision-making, popular backing is needed — anyone with an eye to Europe's future now ought to have seen that!
(Forslaget til beslutning vedtoges)
REDING (PPE), in writing. — (FR) Are small countries to become second-class EC Members?
Erfaringen har snarere vist, at der har været dygtige rådsformænd og kommissærer fra mindre medlemsstater og mindre dygtige fra store — og vica versa.
Are the Member States with large populations now to be the only stars in the Council of Ministers, whilst the small countries get just the bit parts?
BARRERA I COSTA (ARC). — (EN) Fru formand, på trods af, at alle de af Regnbuegruppen stillede ændrings forslag er blevet forkastet, vil vor gruppe støtte De Giovanni-betænkningen.
Quite apart from the fact that the extolling of federalism in this report may prove counterproductive just as Den mark and the United Kingdom are preparing to ratify the Maastricht Treaty, its ideas on the role and position of the smaller Member States, particularly within the Council of Ministers and Commission, are hardly calculated to inspire public opinion in those countries to any enthusiasm for things European.
Såfremt betænkningens kon klusioner bliver gennemført, vil vi betragte det som et væsentligt skridt i retning af større åbenhed, mere demokratisk kontrol og større effektivitet.
The bald assertion that the Community would be unable to function with more than twelve members if the current rights and positions of the smaller Member States were maintained represents a threat to rights acquired under the Treaty.
Såfremt disse punkter fremstod klart, ville de portugisiske medlemmer stemme for.
For the reasons I have given, I prefer Mr Lagakos's amendments (to Articles 21 and 22) to the other proposals.
Da det ikke med sikkerhed kan udledes af betænkningen, at der sikres ligestilling mellem alle medlemsstaterne, har vi ingen anden mulig hed end at stemme imod.
Because a European Union which does not guarantee the proper representation of all its members — small countries as well — is assuredly no true democracy!
REDING (PPE), skriftlig. — (DE) Skal mindre lande blive til andenklasses EF-medlemmer?
(Parliament adopted the resolution)
Beslut ningen betragter denne tilstedeværelse som en mulighed.
Report and supplementary report (Doc.
I fuld overensstemmelse med betænkningens begrundelse kunne vi godt have tænkt os, at dette punkt blev fremhævet, og det var hensigten med det ene af vore ændringsforslag.
A3-0190/92) by Mr De Giovanni, on behalf of the Committee on Institutional Affairs, on the institutional role of the Council
Endelig, selv om forholdet til de nationale parlamenter helt klart er meget vigtigt, ville en eller anden form for forhold til de regionale parlamenter — naturligvis begrænset til spørgsmål, hvor de har kompetence — tage højde for visse medlemsstaters forfatningsmæssigt meget komplekse struktur, samtidig med at det ville mindske informationsunderskuddet og bringe Fællesskabets instu-
It is also indicative of the attitudes underlying this report that representatives of larger Member States are expected to represent the Community interest better and more effectively than ministers and commissioners from smaller nations.
Som luxembourgsk politiker kan jeg ikke være indforstået med ordførerens forestillinger om det fremtidige rådsformandskab i et større Europa.
As if the quality of individual ministers and commissioners were directly proportional to the size of their countries.
En afskaffelse af den i øjeblikket normale rotation ville føre til en isolering af de små lande: Skal Ministerrådet nu udelukkende ledes af de befolkningstunge stater, mens de små stater bliver tildelt statistrollen?
Experience has shown, on the contrary, that there have been very able Council presidents and commissioners from smaller Member States and less able ones from large Member States — and vice versa.
Dac værdig, og hvori det findes »uacceptabelt, at en union af demokratiske nationer ikke i sig selv er demokratisk«.
And something discriminatory is Article 4h, since the fact of replacing a rotating Council presidency with an elected one would rob the small Member States of an important guarantee.
Vi mener ikke, at Rådet er en antidemokratisk institution, det synes vi virkelig er fuldstændig selvmodsigende. sigende.
This provision would make for intrigues, alliances, rivalries; it would aggravate disagreements among Member States.
Afslutningsvis mener vi, at betænkningen er et vældig godt instrument til sikring af en bedre ligevægt mellem Fællesskabets institutioner, og jeg komplimenterer hr. De Giovanni for hans fremragende arbejde.
Last of all, the reference to the Maastricht Treaty is presumptuous becasue we should remember that that Treaty is not yet in force, neither has it been ratified by all the Member States.
GOLLNISCH (LDR). — (FR) Fru formand, hr. de Giovannis betænkning indeholder en række rigtige betragtninger.
BARRERA I COSTA (ARC). — Madam President, in spite of the fact that all the amendments tabled by the Rainbow Group have been rejected, our group will support the De Giovanni report.
Vi ved jo, at det er vore tolv medlemsstaters bureaukratier, der mødes, når fagministrene samles i Rådet.
If the conclusions of the report were implemented we would consider that to be an important step towards more transparency, more democratic control and greater efficiency.