natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vi har brug for en målrettet samling af den europæis ke mangfoldighed.
The philosopher Hans Jonas sums up the coming era of human history with the words 'Technology is our destiny'!
På dette grundlag kan der, dersom der på forhånd findes en fornuftigt regulerende ramme med tilstrækkelige bevillinger, opnås en europæisk merværdi, som muliggør og sikrer en førende stilling i verden for Europa.
We can only provide for a life of human dignity as defined by western culture and values if we enjoy the necessary, inalienable material prerequisites of these.
Gennem denne retsakt fik Europa-Parlamentet, Kommissionen og Rådet et stort ansvar for de euro pæiske borgeres fremtidsmuligheder.
ARNDT (S). — (DE) Mr President, I would never theless be in favour of your initial proposal for this question to be considered once again by the quaestors.
Varetagelse af beføjelser betyder overtagelse af pligter.
I am not reassured by what Mr Wawrzik has said !
Energi, forsknings- og teknologiudvalget gik enstemmigt ind for den foreliggende betænkning.
The problem is that if posters in exhibitions which are granted exhibition space attack other groups, this creates considerable difficulties for us.
Dette gælder navnlig for borgerne i Det europæiske Fællesskab.
I shall refer this matter to the
Næstformand
PRESIDENT. Bureau.
Garcia (LDR), ordfører for udvalget om miliø og sundhedsanliggender og forbrugerbeskyttelse. — (PO) Hr. formand, rammeprogrammet for fællesskabsaktioner på forskning og teknologisk udvikling i perioden 1987/91 er et yderst vigtigt dokument.
But the material existence of the European Com munity rests on the fact that we are able reliably to produce and deliver high-value goods at competitive prices and to high quality standards.
I virkelig heden har forskningen altid været stedbarn i Fælles skabet modsat det, der sker i De forenede Stater og Japan.
An essential aim of the framework programme is thus to ensure that the Community is internationally competitive.
Derfor er det et væ sentligt mål med rammeprogrammet at sikre Fælles skabets internationale konkurrenceevne.
C 2-82/86) for a regulation concerning the framework programme of Community activities in the field of research and technological development (1987-1991).
Der hersker i det store og hele enighed om disse mål i Rådet og mellem Rådet og Europa-Parlamentet. Der er fra alle sider gjort et forarbejde, som har muliggjort denne enighed.
There is virtually full agreement, both within the Council of Ministers and between the Council and the European Parliament, as to the desirability of these objectives.
Ved hjælp af det europæiske forskningsprogram håber vi at nå andre vigtige mål: En produktion i Det europæiske Fællesskab, som alt i alt indebærer færre skadelige stoffer og som i højere grad skåner miljøet og sparer på råstofferne.
We hope that the European research programme will enable us to attain additional important objectives: manufacturing methods in the European Community which will overall produce fewer harmful substances, are kinder to the environment and which save on raw materials.
Vi går ud fra, at menneskenes almindelige arbejdsvilkår kan lettes yderligere.
We take it as read that general human working conditions will be further improved.
Vi forventer, at Fællesskabets integration vil få nye impulser fra de nye forskningsbestræbelser.
We expect the new research endeavours to lend greater impetus to the integration of the Community.
Europa-Parlamentet må støtte Kom missionen i dens bestræbelser på at hjælpe forskning og udvikling ud af den tilstand af fattigdom — jeg havde nær sagt kvælning — de befinder sig i.
Land areas under cultivation will in future be worked more carefully and in addition, smaller areas of cultivation will yield better and healthier produce.
Vi kan ikke undlade at knytte nogle kommentarer til den måde, hvorpå bevillingerne er tildelt.
None of this can be achieved using the resources of just one Member State.
Se blot på ener giområdet, hvor kerneenergi praktisk talt absorberer 24,4% eller 1 890 000 ECU.
We need to pool and target the wealth of Europe's resources.
Lægger vi 2.050 000 ECU hertil til informationsteknologierne (26,5%), ser vi, at
We in Europe, with our com mon cultural heritage, are fortunate in possessing creativity in the form of combined logic and flair
Garcia mere end halvdelen af programmet går til disse 2 sektorer.
Sälzer together with methods and a rich experience which are unequalled by any other cultural grouping.
De er uden tvivl vigtige; men de latterliggør de 5,4%, der er tildelt miljøet og de 1,9% til folkesundhed samt den enlige 1 % til havforskning.
Assuming an intelligently ordered framework and adequate funds, this gives Europe an advantage which guaran tees it a position of pre-eminence in the world.
lige organisationsniveauer, som prøver at lave det samme.
And what if there are reductions?
Det er for eksempel blevet påpeget, at meget af det, Eureka udfører, er dækket af der program, som forelægges i dag.
If the cuts are not selective we are going to see the areas that are already worst off suffering most.
Det behøver ikke at være så vigtigt i de tidlige stadier af banebrydende forskning, men når vi kommer frem til anvendelsen af teknologi, bliver det er stort handicap, hvis man har den form for overlapning.
Certain amendments tabled by the Committee on the Environment are aimed at diminishing these disparities; they therefore warrant our wholehearted applause and we very much hope that they will be taken into account so that we do not have to make value judgements on this matter.
Og hvad så i tilfælde af nedskæringer?
The Committee on Energy, Research and Technology has approved this report unanimously.
Vi kan for udse, at de områder, der i forvejen har det dårligt, vil få det værre, hvis ikke nedskæringerne bliver selektive.
I trust the House will do the same by a large majority and thus endorse the importance we attach to the creation of a European Research and Technology Community.
Nogle af de ændringsforslag, der er fremsat af miljøudvalget, har til formål at mindske disse misforhold; og derfor støtter vi dem.
If the Sälzer report is approved with the amendments to the programme and funding, we may then be able to hope that it will live up to the expectations it has raised.
Det er derfor vigtigt, at hele program met bringes ind i Fællesskabets rammer.
IN THE CHAIR: MR SEEFELD
O'Malley (PPE), ordfører for udtalelsen fra budgetudvalget. — (EN) Hr. formand, på mit udvalges vegne vil jeg gerne give udtryk for vor kraftige støtte til for slaget om at finansiere et andet stort rammeprogram for forskning.
O'MALLEY (PPE), draftsman of an opinion for the Committee on Budgets. — Mr President, on behalf of my Committee I would like to express our strong support for the proposal to fund a second major frame work programme for research.
Jeg vil også gerne sige, at vi ikke ønsker, at de 7,7 milliarder, som blev foreslået af Kommissionen i august, bliver skåret yderligere ned i løbet af programmet.
I would also like to say that we would not like to see the 7.7 billion figure, which was proposed by the Commission last August, being cut back any further over the period of the pro gramme.
Til sidst vil jeg gerne give udtryk for det samme synspunkt som budgetudvalget, nemlig at der bør reserve res en bestemt andel af forskningsbudgettet til små virksomheder.
GARCIA (LDR), draftsman of an opinion for the Com mittee on the Environment, Public Health and Con sumer Protection. — (PT) Mr President, the frame work programme of Community activities in the field of research and technological development for the period 19871991 is a document of the highest import ance.
For under normale omstændigheder har små virksomheder ikke det administrative apparat til at gå ind i hele den indviklede og langvarige ansøgningsprocedure, der kræves for at blive involveret i disse projecter.
Research has always been a poor relation in the Community, while in the United States of America and Japan things are quite different.
Det er den erfaring, man har gjort i De forenede Stater, at ikke før man gjorde det te, skete der en dramatisk stigning i deres programs produktivitet.
So it is more than laudable, it is imperative to formulate and defend a European research and development model in which public health and the protection of the environment are linked in with the enlarged economic area and the idea of competitive ness.
Hr. formand, jeg gentager, at vi ønsker størst mulig finansiering af dette program, men vi ønsker også pengene brugt så godt som muligt.
7735 million ECU over four years is little enough to provide but doing it in the hope that a short-term burden will release the full capacity of the programme is still worse.
Jeg vil også gerne gentage vor modstand mod ideen om faste lofter over enkelte elementer i programmet, og vi håber, at den foreslåede fordeling kun vil blive betragtet som retningslinjer og ikke som stive lofter.
I would also like to reiterate our opposition to the idea of fixed ceilings on specific elements in the programme and we hope that the particular allocations proposed will be regarded as guidelines only and not as rigid ceilings.
Men fordi vi anser dette program for at være så vigtigt, er det også essentielt, at pengene bliver brugt så godt som muligt.
But because we regard this programme as being so important, it is also vital that the money be spent as well as possible.
Især mener jeg ikke, at det er godt nok blot at forelægge en liste over programmer, som ser ud til at være en god ide.
In particular, I think, it is not good enough simply to put forward a list of pro grammes which seem to be a good idea.
Det vi ønsker, er en analyse, for hvis vi skal være selektive i anvendelsen af midler, behøver vi en grundig analyse.
What we want to see is an analysis because if we have to be selective in the spending of money we need a rigorous analysis.
I en af de aktuelle aktiviteter inden for forskningsområdet, der udføres af regeringer, halvstatslige institutioner og private virksomheder, hvad er f.eks. dér svaghederne og hvad er de områder, hvor forskning på europæisk plan kan bidrage med noget, som forskning på med lemsstatsplan ikke kan?
For example, on one of the current activities carried out in the research field by governments, semi-State bodies and by private companies, what are the weak nesses and what are the areas where European scale research can contribute something that Member State level research cannot?
Had er karakteren af de be sparelser, der kan opnås id en store skala?
What is the nature of economies of scale?
Og hvad er den faktiske sammenhæng mellem disse forskellige forskningsområder?
And indeed what is the interrelationship between these different areas of research?
Der findes ikke en sådan analyse idet forslag. Kommissionen har fremsat.
There is no such analysis in the proposal put forward by the Com mission.
Der har mu ligvis eksisteret en sådan analyse for tre eller fire år siden, men forskning er et dynamisk område, og den ne form for fundamental analyse må til stadighed opdateres. Jeg mener, at Parlamentet har krav på, at dokumenter, det får forelagt på dette område, er eksplicitte som motivering for disse programmer.
There may have been such an analysis three or four years ago but research is a dynamic area and this kind of basic analysis must be constantly updated.
Jeg tror, at det er vigtigt først og fremmest at konstatere dette. Det er også nødvendigt, at vi i denne diskussion koncentrerer os om det vigtige punkt, hvor vi er uenige med Rådet, nemlig om programmets omfang.
There is also a tremendous amount of duplication either existing or developing in the whole research area in Europe with a multiplicity of groups and different levels of organizations trying to do the same thing.
Kommissionen har foreslået 7,7 mia ECU, Europa-Parlamentet — i hvert fald mit udvalg — vil helhjertet støtte dette og siger endog, at dette for os er en minimumgrænse.
For example, it has been pointed out that a lot of what Eureka is doing is covered in the programme being put forward today.
Otte af de tolv medlemsstater støtter Kommissionen. Fire medlemsstater kan des værre ikke gøre dette.
This may not be so important in the early stages of pioneering research but as we move towards the application of technology it does become a great handicap if you have such duplication.
Til min beklagelse må jeg sige, at mit eget land, Nederlandene, hører til disse.
But making a few adjustments to the way the funds are distributed is not enough.
Ne derlandene siger, at 6 mia ECU er tilstrækkeligt og henviser i denne forbindelse til Fællesskabets budget mæssige problematik. Jeg synes, at dette er påfaldende og bemærkelsesværdigt, fordi det trods alt er et program for fem år.
One has only to look at the item for energy, where nuclear energy alone absorbs virtually all the allocation of 24.4% or 1890 million ECU; add to this 2050 million more for information technology (26.5%), and we have more than half the programme spent on these two sectors.
Den nederlandske regering vil da ikke sige, at man tror, at landbrugsproblemerne om fem år stadig vil stille alle Fællesskabets andre pro blemer i skyggen?
They are undoubtedly important, but this leaves a derisory 5.4% for the environment, 1.9% for public health (and here I query what funds will be available for serious research into AIDS and cancer), and only a mere 1 % for the sea.
For at give Dem en idé om, hvilken størrelsesorden vi taler om: til dette femårsprogram ville de store medlemsstater betale mindre, end vi kommer af med på ét år til bevarelsen af over produktionen af ét produkt, nemlig mælk, i Fælles skabet. Det koster os alene 6 mia ECU om året.
O'Malley some idea of the order of magnitude we are talking about, the large Member States want to spend less on this fiveyear programme than we spend on maintain ing the overproduction of one product, milk, in the Community.
Jeg tror, at en vis opstramning med hensyn til disse målsætninger ville hjælpe forelæggelsen af programmet me get.
I would also like to point out the danger of this whole programme being monopolized by large companies from the more economically advanced countries.
Hr. formand, den socialistiske gruppe lægger betyde lig vægt på punkt 9 i hr. Sälsers betænkning, hvor hans udvalg kræver nærmere undersøgelse af de øko nomiske, sociale og økologiske konsekvenser af pro grammet.
It may be a sign of progress if particular groups of countries in the European Community cooperate in research but the less-developed countries must not be excluded.
Vi håber, at Kommissionen i aften vil give en klar tilkendegivelse af, at den agter at tage dette synspunkt til efterretning.
So it is urgent that as soon as possible the whole programme should be brought within a Com munity framework.
Hvorfor vil man betale mindre til det europæiske rammeprogram?
Why do they want to spend less on the European framework programme?
Fordi disse store medlemsstater er i stand til også selv at gennemføre en række dele af fællesskabsprogrammet, og man tror, at dette kan give ens egen industri konkurrencefordele.
Because these large Member States are able to undertake various parts of the Community programme themselves, which they think may give their own industries competitive advantages.
Men kon kurrencefordele på hvilket marked? På et marked, der falder fra hinanden, over for andre medlemsstater, som, når de konfronteres med en tysk, Fransk og engelsk industris stærke stilling, kun vil skabe nye hindringer.
But, Mr President, competitive advantages in what kind of market?
Kort sagt; det er kortsynet af de store medlemsstater at foretrække forskning og udvikling på nationalt plan fremfor på fællesskabsplan.
Finally, I would like to put forward the point of view also expressed by the Committee on Budgets that small companies should have a specific proportion of the research budget set aside for them because in the nor mal course of events the small companies do not have the administrative capacity to deal with the whole complex and lengthy application process for getting involved in these projects.
Det er også kortsynet, fordi de store konkurrenter, De forenede Stater og Japan, ikke står stille.
We should make a special effort to ensure that the small companies get involved because often they are flexible enough to innovate and be commercially involved in applying new technologies.
Man kan styrke sin egen stilling over for små medlemsstater, men man kommer der ved længere bagud i forhold til de forenede Stater og Japan.
It was the experience of the United States that not until they did this was there a dramatic increase in the productivity of their programme.
De af os, som nøje har fulgt fremskridtene i Esprit-programmet, Brite-programmet og Race-programmet, kan bekræfte de resultater, Kommissionen allerede har opnået i sit første rammeprogram.
The large Member States can strengthen their own position compared with other, small Member States, but the gap between them and the United States and Japan will widen.
Vi ser meget gerne, at det bliver fortsat og styrket i det andet pro gram.
Mr President, I repeat that we would like to see as much funding as possible for this programme but we would also like to see the money being spent as well as possible.
Jeg tror, at det er meget vigtigt, at Parlamentet i aften i sin beslutning giver udtryk for det standpunkt, at hvis Rådet virkeligt vil foretage en stor nedskæring af Kommissionens forslag, anmodes Kommissionen om at tage sit forslag tilbage.
I consider it very important for Parliament to state in its resolution this evening that, if the Council makes a major reduction in the Commission's proposal, the Commission will be requested to withdraw its proposal.
Jeg tror, at dette er et meget klart signal til Rådet om, at en yderligere reduktion af det fælles rammeprogram ikke er acceptabel for os.
I feel that will be a very clear signal to the Council that we consider a further reduction in the Com munity framework programme unacceptable.
De vil bemærke, at vi i denne betænkning ikke har søgt at ændre de procenter, der er angivet for de for skellige sektorer.
ADAM (S). — Mr President, the Socialist Group gives its general support to the Commission proposals and welcomes the Sälzer report.
Det er gjort med fuldt overlæg.
The Com mission has proposed 7 700 m ECU.
Derfor vil den socialistiske gruppe ikke støtte de ændringsforslag, der er stillet af udvalget om miljø- og sundhedsanliggender og forbrugerbeskyttelse.
I regret that my own country, the Netherlands, is one of them. The Netherlands says that 6 000 m ECU is enough and refers in this connection to the Com munity's budgetary problems.
Vi mener, at diskussionen om de beløb, der hvert år gives til hvert enkelt pro gram, er noget, som er en særlig del af budgetproceduren, og vi er ikke parate til på nogen måde at underminere det ved at acceptere miljøudvalgets ændringsforslag. dringsforslag.
I find this remarkable because this is, in the final analysis, a fiveyear pro gramme. The Netherlands Government surely does not mean to say that the agricultural problems will still be overshadowing all the Community's other problems in five years' time.
Fællesskabets rammeprogram for forskning skal være den motor, der driver Fællesskabets industri frem, omtrent på samme måde som forsvarsprogrammet driver industrier frem i De. forenede Stater og det japanske ministerium for international handel og in dustri driver initiativerne frem i Japan.
The framework research programme of the Com munity has got to be the motor which drives Com munity industry in rather the same fashion that the defence programme drives industry in the United States and the Japanese Ministry for International Trade and Industry drives their efforts in Japan.
Fællesskabet må kunne reagere på vore konkurrenters vigtigste initiativer, og vi ser dette som rammeprogrammet for
The Community has to have a response to the main efforts of our competitors and we see this as being the function of the research framework programme.
Vi noterer os, at mødet i Finansministerrådet den 17. november også understregede dette, og vi opfordrer indtrægende Kommissionen til i aften at komme med en tilkende givelse vedrørende dens holdning til punkt 5 i beslutningsforslaget. Dette gav anledning til betydelig diskussion i udvalget, og jeg var noget overrasket over,
Therefore we welcome the increased emphasis on competitive ness that is included in the second programme and in particular what the programme has to say about infor mation technology, about telecommunications and the importance of applying new technologies to manufac-
Adam forskning: 7,7 mia ECU for fem år og tolv lande!
Adam essential to achieving our objectives.
Vi beklager, at det man på det europæiske topmøde i sidste uge ikke så sig i stand til at give en klar politisk tilkendegivelse over for Kommissionen og Rådet.
We regret that the European Summit last week was not prepared to give a clear political indication to the Commission and the Council.
Vi håber, hr. formand, at Parlamentet vil gøre det her i aften.
We hope, Mr President, the Parliament will do that this evening.
Vi håber, at dets behandling ikke vil kunne sammenlignes med en tromle, der forhindrer græsset i at gro frem igen, og vi ønsker, at Europa-Parlamentet i aften så godt som enstemmigt tilkendegiver sin vilje til at se det teknologiske Europa udvikle sig til sikring af Europas frem tid.
We accept that there is an increasing gap between our competitors and ourselves and we hope that the Commission will draw up firmer guidelines on our objectives, particularly as to what we can expect to achieve in the balance of payments field, what we want to achieve in terms of market share and what we want to achieve in job creation.
Mallet (PPE). - (FR) Hr. formand, i Europas historie er der tidspunkter, hvor fremtiden afgøres for de næste mange år, uden at man altid straks lægger mærke til det.
MALLET (PPE). — (FR) Mr President, from time to time in the course of its history, Europe comes to a watershed, a moment at which developments for years and years ahead are crucially influenced, although this is not always immediately apparent.
Debatten om forksningsrammeprogrammet er et sådant øjeblik.
The debate on the framework research programme is a case in point.
Det drejer sig om en betydelig politisk beslutning og en vigtig finansiel beslutning.
The decision facing us is of great political significance and major financial importance.
Det første spørgsmål, der rejser sig, er ikke, om det af Kommissionen foreslåede program er for dyrt eller ikke, men om det er nødvendigt, godt, gennemtænkt, sammenhængende og velafbalanceret.
The first question to be considered is not whether or not the programme proposed by the Commission is too costly, but whether it is necessary, whether it is right, well thought out, coherent, balanced.
Dette er opfat telsen i Fællesskabets industrikredse, der netop har udsendt en appel til Rådets formand, for de er sig bevidst, at konkurrencedygtigheden i forhold til Ja pan og USA stiller store krav.
That it is these things is the verdict of the Community industrialists who have just made an appeal to the President-in-Office of the Council, for they are aware of what is meant by the need to compete with Japan and the United States.
De er sig også bevidst, at en fælles politik for forskning og teknologisk ud vikling er et væsentligt og uomgængeligt element i gennemførelsen af enhedsmarkedet.
They are also aware that a common research and technological development policy is essential, indispensable to the process of completing the single market.
Vi undervurderer ikke Fællesskabets og medlemsstaternes aktuelle budgetmæssige vanskeligheder.
Although we spend less than 2% of the total research effort in Europe through the Community budget, we recognize that our programme has a catalytic effect in bringing together, in different countries, industry, the research workers and the research institutes.