natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vi må altså afveje, hvad vi gør, og jeg håber, at Parlamentet altid vil have forståelse for det, når vi når frem til en afgørelse, som ikke går ud på at fremsætte et nyt forslag.
Finally, we are quite happy with the common position as enunciated by the Council about a month ago and welcome this second reading.
Nu til proceduren: Vi er, fru Scrivener, til enhver tid rede til sagligt at underrette Parlamentet derom og drøfte den med det.
JENSEN (S). — (DA) Mr President, I should like to thank Mrs Banotti for her report. On behalf of the
Formanden. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
Insider dealing — Recommendation for the second reading (Doc. A3-41/89) by Mr Hoon
A3-35/89) af Weber
A335/89) by Mrs Weber
Insiderhandel — Indstilling ved anden behandling (dok.
Investment services in the securities field — Report (Doc.
A3-31/89) af Hoon
A344/89) by Mr Bru Puron
STEP og EPOCH — Indstilling ved anden behandling (dok. A3-36/89) af Rinsche
STEP and Epoch programmes — Recommendation for the second reading (Doc. A336/89) by Mr Rinsche
BRIDGE — Indstilling ved anden behandling (dok.
Bridge programme — Recommendation for the second reading (Doc.
A3-38/89) af Pompidou
A3-38/89) by Mr Pompidou
A329)89) af Quistorp
A3-27/89) by Mr Prag
Råstoffer og genbrug — Indstilling ved anden behandling (dok. A3-37/89) af Porrazzini
Raw materials and recycling — Recommend ation for the second reading (Doc. A3-37/89) by Mr Porrazzini
Farlige stoffer og præparater — Indstilling ved anden behandling (dok.
Question Time (Doc. B3-217/89)
A3-40/89) af Lord Inglewood
A3-40/89) by Lord Inglewood
Forbrugerkredit — Indstilling ved anden behandling (dok.
Consumer credit — Recommendation for the second reading (Doc. A3-3/89) by Mr Hoon
Spørgsmål til Kommissionen
— Question No 3 by Mr Price: Recent develop ments in Community competition policy
Forbrugerkredit (fortsættelse) Lane, Pandolft (Kommissionen)
(continuation)
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
— Question No 4 by Mrs T. Nielsen: Sedoc
Spørgsmål nr. 3 af Price: Den seneste udvikling i EF's konkurrencepolitik
Debates of the European Parliament
— Spørgsmål nr. 13 af Calvo Ortega: Forekomster af lungesyge hos kvæg i den autonome region Castilla-Leòn
— Question No 13 by Mr Calvo Ortega: Outbreak of bovine contagious pleuro­pneumonia in Castilla y Leon (Spain)
Spørgsmål nr. 4 af Tove Nielsen: SEDOC
■ Question Antarctica
Milian (Kommissionen), Tove Nielsen, Milian
Mr Christophersen (Commission), Cassidy, Mr Christophersen
— Spørgsmål nr. 14 af Elliott: Aldersdiskrimination i Kommissionen
­ Question No 11 by Mr Garaikoetxea Urriza : Deep­sea trawls
Spørgsmål nr. 5 af Stewart: Oliesudslippet fra ICI-anlægget (Merseyside) i Merseyfloden
— Question No 16 by Mr Bird: Counterfeiting of electrical equipment
— Spørgsmål nr. 15 af Cassidy: Alderdiskriminering i forbindelse med EF-institutionernes ansættelsespolitik
­ Question No 12 by Mrs Banotti: mental impact assessment directive on the
— Spørgsmål nr. 16 af Bird: Efterligning af elektriske artikler
IN THE CHAIR: MR PETERS
Spørgsmål nr. 9 af Pasty: Beskyttelse af Antarktis
Vice­President (The sitting was opened at 9 a.m.)
Spørgsmål nr. 11 af Garaikoetxea Urriza: Anvendelse af flydetrawl
Approval of Minutes — Topical and Urgent debate (Announcement) : see Minutes.
Kommissionens reaktion på Parlamentets udtalelser
Debates of the European Parliament
Spørgsmål nr. 12 af Banotti: Direktiv om vurdering af visse offentlige og private projekters indvirkning på miljøet
I will speak for myself alone, as a non-smoker for some 25 years, who still remembers the pleasure of a good pipe and a good cigar, neither of which is inhaled.
FORSÆDE: HANS PETERS nes love og administrative bestemmelser om mærkning af tobaksvarer (Ordfører: Andrews).
The real problem I believe with labelling is that, as with advertising, the warnings are only seen and read by nonsmokers or those in the process of giving up.
(Mødet åbnet kl. 9.00) ')
Debates of the European Parliament
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er indstilling ved andenbehandling (dok.
AVGERINOS (S). — (GR) Mr President, first of all I want to congratulate Mr Andrews.
A3-24/89) fra Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse vedrørende Rådets fælles hold ning (dok.
And having said that I must say also that the Socialist Group finds the deletion of the reference to snuff in Amend ment No. 2 unacceptable, Mr Andrews, and we shall be voting against it.
C3-12/89 — SYN 116) til forslag til direktiv om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstater-
For us, as a parliament, the only consideration is the health of Europe's citizens. That is where our responsibility lies.
Andrews (RDE), ordfører. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg havde ikke regnet med, at det ville være nødvendigt for mig endnu en gang at skitsere formålet med denne indstilling.
The Environment Committee at its last meeting, which unfortunately I was not able to attend, voted against an increase in the cancer budget from 8.5 m ECU to 10 m ECU, which was one of my amendments.
Men jeg har talt med nogle af mine nye kolleger og de bedt mig om så kort som muligt at fremstille baggrunden for Kommissionens forslag.
It is most important and, indeed, perfectly obvious that the Commission will not have sufficient funds in the coming year to deal adequately with the programme they have prepared as part of the European programme against cancer.
I 1985 understregede Det Europæiske Råd både i Milano og i Luxembourg, hvor vigtigt det var, at man fik iværksat et europæisk program i kampen mod kræften.
BANOTTI (PPE). — Mr President, I, too, would like to congratulate Mr Andrews on his very succinct and, even more important, very quickly presented report to this Parliament.
Kommissionen reagerede ved i januar 1986 at nedsætte et udvalg afførende cancer specialister, som skulle forberede et program, Europa mod Kræften.
As recently as last month, the cancer tobacco debate has caused quite significant polemic in Parliament. I notice that my colleague, Mr Panella, is getting ready once again to weigh in as we both did last session.
Dette blev offentliggjort af Kommissionen i december 1986.
I am directly identified as being on one side of the polemic and he at the other.
') Godkendelse af protokollen — Debat om aktuelle og uopsættelige spørgsmål af væsentlig betydning (meddelelse): se protokollen.
PIMENTA (LDR). — (PO) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I should like to echo the previous speakers, particularly Mrs Banotti.
Dette sker enten i form af angivelse af tjære- og nikotinindhold, eller ved en advarsel om sundhedsskadeligheden, eller begge dele.
So what we should do in 1990 is step up the programme and make good its failings, rather than cut its funding.
Kommissionen har ret, når den mener, at alle forbrugere i hele Fællesskabet bør have de samme informationer, ud fra hvilke de kan træffe deres valg.
We also agree that one of the programme's important features is prevention, with education and information on tobacco products.
Det er Kommissionens agt at stille alle de videnskabelige informationer, der foreligger, til de europæiske for brugeres rådighed, og det er en god ting.
We certainly do not wish to deny the rights of smokers. We must seek to educate those who use tobacco products while at the same time guaranteeing the rights of non-smokers.
dette program 74 forslag til handling på otte forskel lige områder: Tobak, ernæring, kræftfremkaldende stoffer, screening og diagnosticering, oplysning, sundhed og uddannelse, uddannelse og forskning.
to prevent diseases, not least cancers. I also support labelling in up to three different languages — we ought to be able to get together and decide which ones — but it is and should always be up to the consumer to choose whether to buy an article.
Der var i alt 14 forslag i forbindelse med kampagnen mod tobak.
It is important therefore that the consumer should be informed by this labelling on the cigarette packet what his purchase actually involves.
Af disse var der ca. fem, som ville kræve fællesskabslovgivning enten i henhold til artikel 100 A om det indre marked, eller til artikel 235.
But I think that there should also be an education campaign, particularly for young people at school, for that is where we must direct our attention.
Handlingsforslag 4 i dette program lød: »Harmonisering af mærkningen af cigaretter i Det Europæiske Fællesskab«.
We should therefore like to see greater restrictions on advertizing and a more positive approach to public information and increasing the awareness of those who make the free choice to consume tobacco products.
Inden udgangen af 1989 vil Kommissionen stille forslag vedrørende mærkningen af cigaretter og andre produkter, som fremstilles af tobak, således at der på hver enkelt pakning kan komme til at stå en advarsel om sundhedsskadeligheden og en præcis, detaljeret angivelse af sammensætning og indhold.
After looking carefully at the amendments tabled by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumers, the Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group, like previous speakers, propose that the House should rejects Nos 1 and 2.
Det er nu slået fast, at jo lavere tjæreindholdet er i den tobak, der ryges, desto lavere bliver rygerens risiko for at få lungekræft.
We do not believe there is any scientific justification for excluding rolling tobacco from information on health effects, particularly cancer.
Det finder jeg ejendommeligt, og jeg vil gerne sige til Parlamentet, at jeg opfordrer medlemmerne til at støtte denne indstilling i sin fulde ordlyd, også med hensyn til mærkningen af snus, tobak til rulning og cigarer.
Nonsmokers miss no opportunity to frighten smokers. I have never smoked, but I am and have all my life been surrounded by people who do.
Det forbløffede mig ved mødet her for nylig, at så mange af medlemmerne af De Grønne og så mange socialister stemte for at fjerne disse forslag om mærkning.
People I care a lot about, including my own family. I cannot help speculating on how I should get on with them if they suddenly had to give up smoking.
Så jeg henstiller til Parlamentet, at det vedtager Kommissionens forslag i deres fulde ordlyd.
Also I cannot help wondering what other vices they would take up. For the principle remains that the sum of vices should stay constant.
Derfor offentliggjorde Kommissionen sidst på året et forslag til direktiv om tilnærmelse af medlemssta ternes love og administrative bestemmelser om mærkning af tobaksvarer.
We should of course back the labelling of cigarettes, but we should also quietly persevere with efforts in ordinary everyday life to get people to stop smoking and, even better, to persuade young people not to start.
I Fællesakten hedder det i artikel 100 A, stk. 3, at Kommissionen i de i stk. 1 stillede forslag vedrørende sundhed, sikkerhed samt miljø- og forbrugerbeskyttelse vil tage udgangspunkt i ønsket om en høj grad af beskyttelse.
The LDR Group will therefore propose that amendments Nos 1, 2 and 4 are rejected, and we hope the rest of the House will support us in this.
Vi anerkender de gode hensigter bag Kommissionens forslag til øget beskyttelse af folkesundheden, og vi støttede dem også, men vi pointerede, at det var med urette, Kommissionen bragte artikel 100 A om handelsbarrierer i anvendelse, når det væsentligste sigte med forslagene så åbenlyst var sundheds- og forbrugerbeskyttelse.
I fail to understand why amendment No 2 by the Committee on the Environment aims at excluding snuff. Even if snuff accounts for less than 1 % of the total consumption of tobacco today, it is none the less certainly responsible for cancers of the nasal cavity.
Kommissionen har udformet bestemmelserne i direktivet med dette formål for øje.
Lastly a word about the relationship between this campaign and the encouragement of tobacco growing in the Community.
Målsætningen med direktivet er at harmonisere disse forhold, så niveauet højnes ved at kræve, at tjære- og nikotinindhold angives på cigaretpakkerne og der trykkes advarsler om sundhedsskadeligheden på den største flade af pakninger med alle tobaksprodukter, med ekstra advarsler på cigaretpakker.
Obviously there are many farmers in Europe, in every country — including my own — who are dependent on tobacco growing. I believe the policy of encouraging tobacco growing that has been pursued is wrong.
Det fremgår klart af begrundelsen, at formålet med den bedre mærkning er at nedsætte forbruget af tobaksvarer.
What we should in fact do is start a gradual programme to get people out of tobacco growing, so that those who now do so do not suddenly find they have no income.
Jeg støtter fuldt ud initiativet til at få harmoniseret kravene om mærkning af tobaksvarer i forbindelse med det indre marked, med henblik på at sikre en bedre forbrugerbeskyttelse.
I equally fail to understand how in amendment No 3 the Committee on the Environment intends to exclude labelling on cigar boxes.
Hvis forbrugerne skal kunne få de informationer, som er nødvendige for at kunne træffe rationelle valg, så må de offentlige myndigheder påtage sig ansvaret for at sikre, at fabrikanter og distributører opfylder visse normer.
It is claimed that there is some technical difficulty about printing warnings on cigar boxes.
Valgfrihed må udøves på grundlag af tilstrækkelig oplysning, så forbrugeren kan handle rationelt og ansvarligt.
But Article 4, paragraph 5 of the Commission's directive says that the warning may be either printed or stuck on to the boxes.
I de fleste medlemsstater mener den nationale regering, at tobaksbrugere, specielt cigaretrygere, skal have de relevante og nøjagtige videnskabelige oplysninger om, hvilke farer tobaksrygningen
At a time when self-adhesive stickers abound there is no technical problem at all in sticking them on to cigar boxes.
Forslagene om anvendelse af nationale sprog, i nogle tilfælde helt op til tre forskellige, udgør sande lig en handelshindring.
As I said (and I am repeating the point to make sure there is no misunderstanding), we are not suddenly going to go to farmers and say there is no income for them and no support.
Men Kommissionen beskæftigede sig ikke først og fremmest med økonomiske anliggender eller handelsanliggender, på trods af de overvældende problemer.
We must put forward a detailed, gradual plan to replace tobacco growing in the Community.
Kommissionen har med at udarbejde et praktisk forslag om et indre marked med hensyn til tobaksafgifter.
JEPSEN (ED). — (DA) Mr President, I of course also support the labelling of cigarettes. I want to do all I can
Jeg vil gerne tale for mig selv alene, som et menneske, som i henved 25 år har været ikke-ryger, men som stadig husker glæden ved en god pibe tobak og en god cigar, hvor man ikke inhalerer nogen af delene.
And finally, our group rejects amendment No 4 which proposes (in French) to replace the expression 'tobacco provokes cancer' by 'tobacco favours cancer'.
Jeg anbefalede vort udvalg at støtte den fælles holdning, fordi man ikke kunne forvente at få et flertal for noget andet synspunkt, her i Året mod Kræften, og når man
This latter expression seems to us watered down and much weaker than the text of the original warning.
Beazley, Peter betænker hvilke frygtelige konsekvenser, vi ved denne sygdom medfører.
I must admit that when we are told that tobacco provokes cancer, a very high-cost illness in social terms, we cannot afford to ignore it.
Men det bliver interessant at se, hvilken økonomisk støtte Kommissionen vil tilbyde at yde i forbindelse med lukningen af virksomheder og den overflødiggjorte arbejdskraft, hvis forslagene virkelig slår igennem.
that, along with the harmonization of the health warnings which must appear on the labels of all tobacco products, health education programmes are to be set up in the Member States from school onwards — and as Mr Avgerinos said, this is extremely important — in order to give clear information about the dangers of smoking both for one's own health and for the health of others.
Lukningen af en lang række cancerafdelinger ville måske være den bedste belønning.
Similarly, information campaigns about the serious risks of tobacco use should be carried out periodically aimed at the population as a whole.
lige spørgsmål. Men vi i Parlamentet bør arbejde politisk og udelukkende tænke på beskyttelsen af de europæiske borgeres sundhed.
However, I must say quite frankly that I would like to have some more statistics, because we must be careful with good grills, we do not know to what extent they can provoke a certain cancer.
Sådanne undtagelser er uforståelige og suspekte, hvor meget de end bygger på ikke-beviste videnskabelige teorier.
Now the social cost of good food, like that of good drink, is high.
Vedtagelsen af dette direktiv er et stort skridt til bekæmpelse af kræft i et røgfrit Europa, Europa i år 2000.
We know that the problem of food, of good food, is not an individual problem.
Vi må håbe, at Kommissionen og Rådet vil udvise samme samarbejdsånd i forbindelse med det øvrige lovgrundlag for hele programmet: »Europa mod kræft«.
If we were to agree with you that we are responsible for our own health, because if you fall the social costs of illness are borne collectively, we should therefore have to act.
Banotti (PPE). — (EN) Hr. formand, også jeg vil gerne komplimentere hr. Andrews for hans meget koncise og, hvad der er endnu vigtigere, meget hurtigt udarbejdede betænkning her i Parlamentet.
Without these parallel campaings to increase public awareness, the dissuasive effect of the harm caused by tobacco use is in itself insufficient, by being limited merely to a few health warnings on the labels.
Så sent som i sidste måned forårsagede debatten om cancer og tobak megen polemik i Parlamentet. Jeg ser, at min kollega, hr. Panella, igen gør sig klar til at give sit besyv med, som vi begge gjorde det i sidste mødeperiode.
We could repeat the words of Umberto Eco who wrote recently : 'I smoke and I know that it is very bad for me, but I am waiting for the day when the anti-tobacco campaigns will convince me as well.'
Man identificerer mig direkte med den ene side i denne polemik, og ham med den anden.
For all these reasons, and with this I will finish Mr President, I will support the Common Position and vote against Amendment No 2.
Men jeg er glad for at tilhøre denne side, og det er også med glæde, jeg støtter Kommissionens program for tobaksindustrien generelt.
What I am afraid of, for example, is that some of my colleagues are not motivated by the positive concern, which I share, of reducing the social costs, but by a perverse desire, namely prohibition, a desire to persecute the corrupt, with the old wish of turning the vice into a crime, making our consciences firm and resolute, because left alone we are weaklings.
Efter min mening er det virkelige problem med mærkningen af tobaksvarer, at ligesom med reklamen ses og læses advarslerne kun af ikke-rygere eller af dem, som er ved at holde op.
WIJSENBEEK (LDR). — (NL) Mr President, may I first of all say that it is extremely difficult to follow a debate in this chamber from the back rows.
Man kan skrive advarsler med 25 eller 30 cm. høje bogstaver på plakater og ikke vise noget fabrikationsmærke.
This alphabetical order is another form of discrimination which is not to be found anywhere in print.
Men det er ikke-rygerne, som vil se advarslen og rygerne, som vil kunne identificere det mærke, som ikke nævnes. Sådan er livet — og døden måske!
I must say, Mr President, and then I shall sit down, that Mrs Banotti is mistaken in believing that I am against anything which promotes good health.
Så jeg forventer, at forslagene vil vinde udbredt tilslutning i Parlamentet. Men lad Kommissionen venligst for tælle os snarest muligt om sit forslag vedrørende sammenhængende frilagre, hvis den mener, at artikel 100 A er det korrekte grundlag for dette forslag.
Where I do part ways with her is where this approach is tainted with an antiprohibitionist attitude which usually, in terms of the market, in terms of costs, in terms of effectiveness, runs the risk of going in the opposite direction of the one desired.
Jeg mener ikke, vi kan regne med, at cigaretter og pibetobak ellers kan bringes frit over grænserne, hvis man på trods af, at der er anvendt tre forskellige sprog i advarslen, må gå ud fra, at de alle tre er komplet uforståelige for 90 % af borgerne i de fleste andre medlemsstater.
So to sum up, I agree with the line adopted by my colleagues but warn against intolerance, against a witch-hunt against the depraved and drug addicts.
Vi siger igen og igen fra Parlamentets side i mange af vore forhandlinger, at vi ser på, hvilken slags verden, vore børn vil komme til at arve.
When we talk of unjustified discrimination I wonder why tobacco is the current target of all kinds of campaigns.
Såfremt vore børn ryger lige så meget, som vor generation måske har gjort, så vil der være betydeligt færre af dem tilbage.
We know full well that alcohol, cars, food can also be harmful.
Hr. Andrews pointerede, at Fællesskabets forbrugere må have ret til at træffe et valg og så handle rationelt.
There is one aspect which has been noticeable by its absence in this morning's debate, but I shall mention it now.
Det er vist ret klart, og blev også understreget af min kollega, hr. Beazley, at hvis man er afhængig af tobaksrygning, så er man desværre ude af stand til at handle rationelt.
And that is that tobacco has not only harmful effects.
Som mange har sagt, kan man sagtens være vidende om fordele og ulemper ved tobaksrygning, uden at det rykker ved det forhold, at glæden ved at ryge vejer tungere end den mulige smerte eller endog døden, som hr. Beazley sagde.
Scientists have proved that smoking a good pipe or a good cigar is particularly effective in killing off the many microbes in the oral cavity. In other words we have here another example of completely biased information.
Avgerinos (S). — (GR) Hr. formand, jeg vil først og fremmest komplimentere hr. Andrews.
DÍEZ DE RIVERA ICAZA (S). — (ES) Mr President, as Mr Andrews said, and incidentally, I should like to congratulate him on his work, today as part of the 'Europe against Cancer' programme, we are once again discussing the adoption of the directive on the labelling of tobacco products which, together with the directives already adopted and those still pending, aim to alert the population to the way in which smoking can seriously damage their health.
Jeg skal ikke komme ind på, hvad han sagde om direktivet i sin grundlige analyse.
Mr President, even the Commission is totally inconsistent in its policy.
Med denne betydningsfulde betænkning har vi fået endnu en lejlighed til at bevise, hvilken rolle Europa-Parlamentet spiller på den europæiske scene.
It subsidizes tobacco production and then tries to lay down all sorts of rules to counteract the use of the products which it has subsidized.
Under debatten om dette program blev det fra alle medlemmers side understreget, hvor nødvendigt det er med mere og bedre oplysning af Europas borgere om risikoen ved rygning og brug af andre tobaksprodukter.
Let the Commission stop subsidizing vineyards — for wine production — and a few other harmful products I could mention.
Tobak er ganske vist ikke den enste årsag til kræft, men en hurtig og effektiv intervention fra Kommissionens side vil udfylde et tomrum i oplysningen af borgerne om et spørgsmål af så stor betydning for den offentlige sundhed.
Tobacco has become part and parcel of our life, a very pleasant life, and let us be quite clear that if we try to act more strictly against some tobacco products rather than others, we are barking up the wrong tree, because we are distorting fair competition, and that unfortunately still happens much too often.
På denne baggrund kan Den Socialistiske Gruppe ikke acceptere ændringsforslag nr. 2.
May I in conclusion say that not all of the Liberal Group shares Mr Pimenta's opinions.
Hr. Andrews, vi vil stemme imod ændringsforslag nr. 2 angående tobaksvarer, der indsnuses.
As has already been mentioned, we had the opportunity to listen to very different opinions on the subject of tobacco use both in the previous session and in the last plenary sitting.