natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det ville være en let og retfærdig måde, hvorpå man i nogle år kunne give de portugisiske mælkeproducenter kompensation for de prisfald, der er forud sagt for sektoren.
This would have been a very simple and fair way of compensating Portuguese milk producers for a few years for the fall in prices which is forecast for this sector.
Nu kommer jeg til mit forbehold, og det er følgende: Der er ét ændringsforslag, som Landbrugsudvalget har vedtaget, og som er stillet af fru Ainardi, med det formål ensidigt at pålægge importen en medansvarsafgift.
Let the Commissioner try to understand the farmers' mood when they are presented to public opinion as people who have been taking advantage of a perpetually expanding agricultural budget whereas in reality, despite their work, despite their investment of capital, despite their constantly improving standards of technical knowhow, they are suffering an unremitting, tragic decline in their incomes.
Hvad enten det nu er rimeligt eller ej, så mener vi, at det vil sende et helt vildledende signal til dem, vi fører handelsforhandlinger med, og det er noget, som på ingen måde kan gennemføres, så derfor synes vi, at betænkningen vil være bedre uden dette.
Who could imagine that this absurd mechanism has any chance of persuading the farmers that the reforms are fair? What credibility does the Commissioner have when he says that he wants to sustain the economic and social cohesion of the farming world and keep the majority of farmers on their farms?
Når det gælder ligestillingen af interventionspriserne for blød hvede, uden at det går ud over landmændenes nuværende indtægter, er det Den Portugisiske Mølleindustris Sammenslutning selv, der anbefaler det i tråd med mit forslag, som ville åbne markedet og være gunstigt for konkurrencen.
As regards the harmonization of intervention prices for common wheat — irrespective of the current incomes of producers — it is up to the Associação Portuguesa da Indústria de Moagem to recognize it, by agreeing to my proposal which would open up the market and encourage competition.
Mere generelt har jeg lige haft den fornøjelse at møde hr. Ben Gill, der er næstformand for den britiske sammenslutning af landbrugere.
I would point out that farming is the economic activity with the smallest proportion of young people engaged in it, and therefore with the most uncertain future.
Han, der repræsenterer det britiske landbrug, siger, at hvad de har brug for er sikkerhed og stabilitet, så de kan lægge planer.
Do not undermine them with negative measures, particularly in dairy farming, with the takeover of quotas, which compromise the viability of farms.
Wynn (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, efter to timer med indlæg fra mine fortræffelige kolleger fra Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter taler jeg som den eneste for Budgetudvalget.
WELSH (PPE). — Mr President, I am delighted as it were to make my bow as a junior member of the European People's Party agricultural team. In that con text, I would particularly like to pay tribute to our rapporteur, Mr Navarro, who has done such a splendid job on this report and to say that of course I fully endorse everything our senior spokesman, Mr Sonneveld, has said.
Welsh (PPE). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er meget glad for at kunne tale her som et af de nyere medlemmer af Det Europæiske Folkepartis Landbrugsgruppe.
CUNHA DE OLIVEIRA (S). — (PT) Mr President, with the reform of the CAP expected imminently, the proposal on agricultural prices for the 1992-1993 marketing year which has been brought to us by the Commission, could not have been very different from what it actually is.
I denne forbindelse vil jeg i særdeles hed gerne udtrykke min anerkendelse over for vor ordfører, hr. Navarro, der har gjort sådan et glimrende stykke arbejde med denne betænkning, og sige, at jeg naturligvis er helt enig i alt, hvad vor hovedordfører, hr. Sonneveld, har sagt.
On the other hand, the amendments which were introduced by the Committee on Agriculture were not suitable for making innovations nor did they make significant changes to the budget heading. That is also understandable: we are all awaiting the outcome of such a celebrated reform of the CAP.
De britiske konservative medlemmer af Det Europæiske Folkeparti vil naturligvis støtte Landbrugsudvalgets betænkning med én lille undtagelse, som jeg vil tale om om et øjeblik.
But there are two points to which I would like to draw Parliament's attention, and I cannot understand why they were not accepted by the Committee on Agriculture.
Hr. formand, der er et velkendt skuespil af ireren Samuel Beckett, der hedder Vi Venter på Godot; det har De sikkert set, hr. formand.
Mr President, there is a well known play by Samuel Beckett who was an Irishman, called Waiting for Godot and you no doubt have seen it.
Jeg mener, den moderne version af Vi Venter på Godot nok burde kaldes Vi Venter på GATT, for vi har nu ventet forfærdelig længe. Jeg har megen sympati for kom missæren.
I think the modem version of Waiting for Godot would probably be called Waiting for GATT because we have been waiting now for an awfully long time.
Det interessante ved dette års forhandlinger om landbrugspriserne er, at vi for fem måneder siden drøftede en reform af den fælles landbrugspolitik. Parlamentet afgav sin udtalelse.
The first one — and the most simple — is concerned with not charging any coresponsibility levy to wheat producers for the first 50 tonnes.
Vi fik at vide, at det hastede meget.
This price proposal is a roll-over.
Og alligevel har Ministerrådet nu fem måneder senere ikke gjort noget for at få en sådan reform i stand.
But it is only right if we can now proceed with the real reform so that this price proposal if necessary can be adjusted to fit it and future price proposals, as I think Mr Görlach said, can match themselves to the new circumstances.
Som hr. Welsh har sagt, skaber dette problemer i forbindelse med GATT-forhandlingerne.
So we regard this very much as a delaying action and not the real thing.
Kommissionen ved, at det er bydende nødvendigt med en reform.
We believe we should press ahead as far as possible.
Parlamentet ved det.
Now I come to my reservation and it is this.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
WELSH impose unilaterally a coresponsibility levy on imports.
GATT-panelet ved, at der er hårdt brug for en reform. Alle synes at vide, at en sådan reform er bydende nødvendig, bortset fra Ministerrådet, der mangler den politiske vilje til at gøre noget ved det.
WYNN (S). — Mr President, after two hours of speeches by my admirable colleagues from the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, I speak as the lone voice of the Committee on Budgets.
derne i andre medlemsstater, fordi de er mere effektive til at producere landbrugsvarer, og derved ville de sænke priserne, og de ville overleve, mens mindre effektive producenter ville gå nedenom og hjem.
In fact, they normally get less money. But if that product was not bought into intervention, then those farmers from the Netherlands because they are more efficient producers of dairy products would sell their surpluses in the supermarkets of other Member States, thereby lowering prices, and they would be the survivors while less efficient producers would go to the wall.
Det er det samme med de irske mejeribrugere. De ville også overleve.
It is the same situation with Irish dairy farmers.
Så jeg synes, det er forkert, sådan som det her sker, at henføre garantiudgifterne til bestemte regioner eller enkelte landbrugere, for disse penge går direkte til hver eneste landbruger, der er med i systemet i forhold til den mængde, han producerer.
So I think it is wrong to attribute the guarantee spending as it is attributed here to individual regions or individual farmers because this money goes directly to every farmer who is in the system in proportion to the amount they produce.
Det synes jeg, man bør forstå.
I think that should be understood.
Man siger, at Irland får 6%.
People say Ireland is getting 6%.
Irland får ikke 6%, men noget i retning af 2%, men fordi man blander det sammen med garantipengene fra strukturfondene, så får man dette tal til at blive helt anderledes, end det i virkeligheden er.
It is not getting 6%, it is getting something like 2% but because they tie in the guarantee money with the structural funds, they make the figure out to be entirely something it is not.
Det bør man huske på for fremtiden, og vi bør foretage vore beregninger ordentligt på basis af, hvem der er nettobidragydere til og modtagere af penge fra Fællesskabet. lesskabet.
That should be remembered in future and we should do our calculations properly on the basis of who are net contributors to and recipients of monies from the Community.
Den 18. december 1991 enedes budgetmyndigheden i Fællesskabet om et budget for 1992.
On 18 December 1991 the budgetary authority of the Community agreed a budget for 1992.
To måneder senere sagde Kommissionen, at det ville mangle 2 mia. i at blive udnyttet.
Two months later the Commission said that would be underspent by ECU 2b.
Det er klart, at krystalkuglen ikke virkede i december.
Obviously the crystal ball was not working in December.
Af denne grund mener Landbrugsudvalget, at vi har 2 mia. ECU at lege med. Det har vi ikke.
Because of this, the Agricultural Committee thinks we have ECU 2b to play with. We have not.
Vi har ikke sådanne beløb at lege med. Landbrugsudvalget bør vide bedre end at komme med nogle af de ændringsforslag, det har stillet.
We have not got such amounts to be playing about with. The Agricultural Committee should know better than to put in some of the amendments that it has done.
De ændringsforslag, det har stillet, er en ren foræring til dem inden for Coreper, der siger til deres politiske herrer, at Parlamentet ikke skal have mere kontrol med og indflydelse på Fællesskabets samlede budget.
The amend ments which it has tabled play directly into the hands of those in COREPER who argue to their political masters that this Parliament should not have more control and influence over the whole of the Community's budget.
Vi er nogle her, der forsøger at få slettet forskellen mellem obligatoriske og ikke-obligato-riske udgifter, så vi kan give Parlamentet virkelig magt.
Some of us are attempting to eradicate the differential between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure so that we can give real power to this House.
Disse ændringsforslag fra Landbrugsudvalget hjælper ikke Parlamentet i dets langsigtede strategi.
The amend ments of the Agricultural Committee do not help Parliament's longterm strategy.
Det er simpelt hen en kortsigtet gevinst.
They are simply short-term gains.
Jeg sagde, at jeg ikke var glad for situationen.
I said I was not happy with the situation.
Hvordan kan man være glad, når vi f.eks. i Tyskland foreslår at give landbrugerne en prisnedsættelse på 11% efter en 13% prisnedsættelse sidste år, og når regeringen i går har sluttet forlig med den offentlige sektor og givet 5,5%.
How could one be happy when we are proposing for instance in Germany to give farmers a price reduction of 11 % after a 13% price reduction last year and when yesterday the government settled with its public sector and gave them 5 1/2%.
I Irland har landbrugerne været ude for et fald i indtægterne på ca. 9%, mens den offentlige sektor har fået en forøgelse på ca. 9%.
In Ireland farmers took a drop in income of around 9%, while the public sector got an increase of around 9%.
Fællesskabet har ansvaret for landbrugernes ind komster.
The Community takes responsibility for farmers' incomes.
Det har ikke ansvaret for andres ind komster.
It does not take responsibility for the incomes of others.
I modsætning til, hvad der har været forudsagt, har vi et finansielt overskud.
We have a financial surplus contrary to the projections that were made.
Vi sparer 2,5 mia. i år og forventer at spare 4 mia. næste år.
We are saving 2 1/2 billion in this year and projecting to save 4 billion next year.
Disse besparelser giver vi til de sultende i Afrika. Det bør understreges.
We are giving the savings to the hungry of Africa.
Det er fra landbruget, at nødhjælpen til Afrika kommer.
It is from agriculture that the emergency aid to Africa is going.
Det er ikke rimeligt, at den sektor, der har været ude for dette indtægtstab, skal bære omkostningerne ved støtten til Afrikas befolkning, selv om vi er glade for, at de får denne støtte.
It is not fair that the sector which suffers the biggest income reduction should be the one to carry the cost of support for the people of Africa, even though we are glad to see them get it.
I begrundelsen har hr. Navarro indsat nogle tal, der er meget nyttige, og som jeg gerne vil referere til, fordi jeg mener, at de bliver fejlfortolket af en masse mennesker, der kommenterer garantidelen af land brugsudgifterne.
The longterm goal is important because although we have debated today and we will spend two or three hours voting on Thursday, we will do nothing about agricultural prices because they are compulsory expenditure.
Disse garantipenge henføres til regionerne eller medlemsstaterne og enkelte landbrugere, når der sker intervention, og det giver et meget vildledende billede af situationen.
We need to show our responsibility and not the irresponsibility shown by the Agricultural Committee.
Saridakis (PPE). — (GR) Hr. formand, Kommissionens forslag til landbrugspriser og dertil knyttede foranstaltninger 1992/1993 behandles på baggrund af revisionen af den fælles landbrugspolitik.
SARIDAKIS (PPE). — (GR) Mr President, the Commission's proposals for agricultural prices and accompany ing measures 1992-1993 are, of course, being discussed in the same breath as the CAP reform proposals.
Samtidig er GATT-forhandlingerne præget af uvished og uigennemsigtighed.
At the same time the GATT talks are shrouded in mystery.
Desuden medfører kriser på landbrugsmarkederne og ugunstige klimatiske for hold, såsom den voldsomme tørke, der har ramt mange områder i Fællesskabet og betydet øgede produktionsomkostninger, et vedvarende fald i landbrugsindtægterne, især for de sydlige landes land mænd.
Moreover farmers' incomes are progressively being eroded because of the agricultural market crises, adverse climatic conditions, such as the great drought affecting many regions of the Community, increase production costs.
Hr. Navarro, som jeg gerne vil komplimentere for hans arbejde, påpeger mange af disse problemer.
McCARTIN (PPE). — Mr President, I want to congratulate Mr Navarro on his report and to say that the job of a rapporteur is to put forward a good compromise.
Saridakis søger ind i landbrugserhvervet. De går andre steder hen og forsøger at tjene penge andre steder end på landet.
SARIDAKIS paid directly to the farmer is most certainly the best solution.
Under disse omstændigheder med krise, usikkerhed og afventen kunne man forvente, at Kommissionens forslag indeholdt nogle udsigter til en normalisering af situationen.
Mr Navarro, whom I congratulate warmly, has high lighted many of these problems. In this climate of crisis, uncertainty and expectation, we might have expected the Commission to come up with proposals that would smooth the waters.
Desværre er dette ikke tilfældet.
Unfortunately this was not the case.
Hvordan kan man forklare landmændene, at den mislykkede politik med stabilisatorerne skal fortsætte mindst et år endnu, en politik, som har medført konstant indtægtsnedgang uden at skabe balance mellem udbud og efterspørgsel?
How can we now explain to farmers that, for at least another year, they will have to put up with the miserable policy of stabilisers, a policy which has only helped to lower farmers' incomes without balancing supply and demand?
Hvordan kan man forsvare nedskæringerne, når det lader til, at Landbrugsfonden vil have væsentlige overskud i 1992 og 1993?
Who can explain away the restrictive measures when it is forecast that there will be especially significant surpluses in the agricultural kitty in 1992 and 1993?
Hvordan kan man forsvare de omlægninger, der forsøges gennemført på områder som bomuld og olivenolie i en så vanskelig tid, hvor man tværtimod skulle forvente positive foranstaltninger for disse producenter?
Who can justify the upheaval some sectors will suffer, such as cotton and olive-oil, in such a difficult period, when people might have expected positive measures to help those producers?
Jeg behøver ikke at minde kommissæren om, at de nuværende overskud meget vel kan forsvinde hurtigt.
I have no need to remind the Commissioner that the present surpluses could disappear rapidly.
Én dårlig høst, én dårlig vækstsæson for græs set, og så kan vi befinde os i en helt anden situation.
One poor harvest, one bad grass-growing season and we would be in a different position.
Jeg vil gerne benytte denne lejlighed til over for kommissæren at påpege, at der i min valgkreds i øjeblikket består en stor fare.
I would like to take this opportunity to point out to the Commissioner that there is a great danger in my constituency at the present time.
Den pløjede jord er ikke blevet tilplantet eller tilsået, og den fortsatte stærke regn ødelægger græsset.
Arable crops have not yet been planted or sown and the continuing high rainfall is destroying the grassland.
Jeg stoler på, at han vil tænke på dette, da vi har et underskud af korn i vort område.
I trust he will bear this in mind, as we are a cereal-deficit area.
Må jeg påpege over for ham, at det ikke tjener noget formål at have et overskud af korn i andre dele af Europa, hvis man ikke frigiver det til de områder i Fællesskabet, der trænger til korn, til en fornuftig pris og med fornuftige omkostninger.
Can I point out to him that there is little point in having surplus cereals in other parts of Europe if you do not release them at a reasonable price and a reasonable cost to those areas of the Community that do require grain.
Det er det, jeg indtrængende vil anmode kommissæren om.
That is my urgent plea to the Commissioner.
Lord Inglewood (PPE). — (EN) Hr. formand, i de år, hvor jeg har været medlem af Parlamentet, har jeg ved en række lejligheder talt om de problemer, som landbrugerne i de højtliggende områder i Det Forenede Kongerige lider under.
INGLEWOOD, The Lord (PPE). — Mr President, in the years in which I have been a Member of this House I have spoken on a number of occasions about the problems facing upland farmers in the UK.
Jeg vil ikke give nogen undskyldning for, at jeg gør det igen.
I make no apology for doing so again.
Det er til dels fordi et stort antal af dem er mine vælgere, og jeg er selv involveret, men det er i lige så høj grad fordi denne del af landbruget alt for ofte bliver overset af »de tunge drenge«, når der skal udarbejdes en politik.
It is partly because a large number of them are my constituents and I have an involvement myself, but at least as importantly, because too often this section of agriculture is overlooked by the 'big boys' during policy making.
Jeg tror ikke, at de prisforslag om videreførelse, som vi har fået forelagt nu, er tilstrækkelige til at hjælpe erhvervet gennem det næste år.
We should emphasis the following when referring to the olive-oil sector: this sector is neither a surplus producer nor problematic in Community terms.
Den nuværende usikkerhed er ikke god for erhvervet i det lange løb, og den meget langtrukne debat om landbrugsreformen tjener kun til at forøge denne frustration.
The intervention mechanism has a clearly regulatory role to play and works simply and only as a safety-net for the producer.
Jeg vil gerne have gjort en ende på det nuværende dødvande, som vi tilsyneladende befinder os i med hensyn til reformen af den fælles landbrugspolitik.
Unfortunately, within the framework of the failed policy of recent years, and especially the decisions taken in 1988, the Community intervention mechanism was heavily restricted in terms of time.
Der er ingen landbrugere, der i øjeblikket kan planlægge tolv måneder frem, for slet ikke at tale om fem år.
It is high time that we corrected this situation, so that Community intervention can work all the year round.
Det ødelægger tilliden inden for erhvervet, og faktisk er det sådan, at unge landbrugere ikke
It is also time that we extended it to the whole industry to protect producers and consumers alike from disconcerting fluctuations in prices and the moneygrabbing antics of profiteers.
Inden for landbruget i Det Forenede Kongerige begynder alt i højlandet, særlig med hensyn til oksekøds- og fårekødssektoren.
Within the organization of the agriculture industry in the UK, especially the beef and sheep sectors, everything starts in the hills.
Når tiderne bliver vanskeligere, falder priserne i lavlandet over det hele.
When times get harder on the lower ground prices drop all round.
Den måde, hvorpå lavlandslandbrugerne opret holder deres indtægt, er ved at betale mindre for det, de køber fra højlandet.
The way in which the lowland farmer maintains his margin is to pay less for what he buys from the hills.
Det er bjergbonden, der ikke har nogen at lade sorteper gå videre til, der lider tab.
It is the hillman, who has nobody to pass the drop on to, who bears the loss.
En af mine vælgere har for nylig fortalt i pressen, at han nu får det halve af, hvad han fik for sine lam for tre år siden.
One of my constituents reported in the press recently that he is now getting half for his lambs what he got three years ago.
Og det er fra den mindst velstående sektor i Det Forenede Kongeriges landbrug.
And this is from the least prosperous sector of UK agriculture.
Under normale omstændigheder, hr. formand, ville Kommissionen fremlægge en mere restriktiv pakke for 1992/1993 for at tage højde for den manglende balance på markedet inden for adskillige sektorer, men situationen er temmelig anderledes ved denne lejlighed, eftersom Kommissionen i sin reformpakke vedrørende den fælles landbrugspolitik allerede har stillet forslag, der skal tage højde for problemerne på en mere grundlæggende måde.
The fact that inflation has continued and will continue to increase and that income continues even in the best areas of agriculture in Europe to remain static and in some areas like my own to decrease, will mean that farmers cannot look forward with any degree of confidence to the year ahead. The present uncertainty is not good for the industry in the long term and the long drawn out debate on agricultural reform only serves to increase this frustration.
Under disse omstændigheder er prisforslagene for 1992/1993 blevet udformet på en sådan måde, at det vil muliggøre en snarlig afgørelse om reformen, og det mener jeg, har afspejlet sig i næsten alle indlæg fra medlem merne her i dag.
I would wish to see an end to the present impasse we appear to be facing in the reform of the agricultural policy. We must end these continuous short-term proposals and plan for the longterm future of the agricultural industry throughout the European Community.
Nu vil man sige til mig, at stykprisen pr. dyr er hævet, og det er også rigtigt, men den er indrettet sådan, at den har mindre virkning i Det Forenede Kongerige end andre steder på grund af den særlige struktur inden for Det Forenede Kongeriges land brug.
Now I shall be told there are improved headage pay ments, and indeed there are, but they are so modulated as to have a proportionately less effect in the UK than elsewhere because of the particular structure of UK agriculture.
Det kunne være forståeligt, hvis strukturen i højlandslandbruget i Det Forenede Kongerige var utilfredsstillende, men medmindre jeg helt har misforstået situationen, er det Fællesskabets politik at opmuntre familiebrug — landbrugere, der giver deres familier en anstændig, men ikke overdådig levestandard.
That might be understandable if the structure of UK upland agriculture was in some way unsatisfactory, but unless I have fundamentally misunderstood the position, it is Community policy to encourage family farms — farmers who provide families with a decent but not lavish livelihood.
Sådan forholder det sig netop med mange af disse landbrug.
This is an exact description of many of these holdings.
Her drejer det sig ikke om fritidslandmænd med lukrative job i erhvervslivet.
These are not part-time hobby farmers with lucrative jobs in industry.