natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Spørgsmål nr. 1 : Vil den kommissær, der er ansvarlig for miljøet, sørge for, at Kommissionen i fremtiden arbejder tæt sammen med IAEA's driftsikkerhedstilsynsgrupper i sikkerhedsspørgsmål, da den har vist sig inkompetent med hensyn til at handle alene?
EBEL (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, honourable Members, I am really sorry that I must begin my state ment by quite firmly and vigorously contradicting what Mrs Bloch von Blottnitz says.
Jeg vil gerne udtrykke min anerkendelse af kommis særens meget prompte reaktion i forbindelse med Trawsfynydd-anlægget i Wales.
Is the Commission in the habit of address ing circulars of this kind to all the Member States, and if so, at what intervals and on what criteria?
Som De uden tvivl ved, giver dette anledning til enorm uro i mit land, Irland.
How did the Commission interpret the provisions of Article 35, confirmed by Articles 77 and 81, which make no refer ence to requesting prior permission of the Member States?
Jeg er også meget glad for, at han anvendte artikel 34, der var grundlaget for min uopsættelige beslutning i Parlamentet i denne uge.
Can the Commission tell us what are the limits of its responsibility towards Member States in the exercise of its powers under the Euratom Treaty?
Hr. Sherlock henviste tidligere i sin tale til artikel 34, men han havde ikke et eksemplar af den hos sig.
Can the Commission also tell me why it replied to question No 18/79, tabled by Mr Glinne in 1986, that it exercised permanent surveillance at the Aachen power station, which was involved in illicit dealings similar to those in which Belgium and Germany are currently implicated?
Enhver medlemsstat, på hvis område særlig farlige eksperimenter skal finde sted, skal træffe yderligere bestemmelser om beskyttelse af sundheden, hvorom den forinden indhenter Kommissionens udtalelse.
If this House makes use of its parliamentary right to set up a committee of inquiry on this matter which no doubt causes serious anxiety to the public I think it is quite unsuitable and shows little sense of parliamentary responsibility to say as an emotional generalization : 'We always knew and said that things were incredibly sloppy in this field!' and then immediately to follow this by saying the only way out is to abandon the nuclear industry.
Kommissær Clinton Davis forklarede, at artikel 34 i Euratom-Traktaten kræver, at de, der forestår atomanlag, skal indhente Kommissionens udtalelse forud for så farlige eksperimenter som dem, man har planlagt i Trawsfynydd.
When it meets on 15 Februar)' to consider the question of safety of waste transportation, will it consider the United Kingdom proposal to use Dounreay on the far north coast of Scotland as a reprocessing plant?
Jeg vil gerne vide, om de britiske atommyndigheder hørte Kommissionen forud for forsøgene i 1982 og 1986, og i benægtende fald hvorfor ikke?
This will obviously involve the transportation of waste over vast distances.
Er artikel 34 i Euratom-Traktaten tid ligere blevet overtrådt af den britiske regering?
If you add it up, it will be thousands of miles, whether it be from France, Germany, Japan or the USA.
Er det den egentlige lovovertræder?
It will have to go by air or sea.
Jeg ved, at vi afventer Kommissionens mening om denne specielle test, som den sandsynligvis vil blive informeret om meget snart.
I presume air will be ruled out, although I would be interested to have the Com mission's view.
Anden del af artikel 34 lyder :
Will it go then by sea?
Mit afsluttende spørgsmål drejer sig om atomsikkerhed og Euratoms manglende evne til ordentligt at opfylde sin mission tidligere.
I do not think that does justice either to the gravity of the matter or to our parliamentary duty.
Hr. Sherlock fra Den Europæiske Demokratiske Gruppe sagde, at han ønskede, at undersøgelsesudvalget udelukkende kon centrerede sig om den konkrete Transnuklear-skan-dale i Mol.
The handling of this terrible material is governed by constitutional agreements, the Euratom Treaty, the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and the IAEA controls.
Sigtet må være bredere. Hr. Mosar har været helt ude af stand til at overbevise mig om, at Euratoms sikkerhedsdirektorat er sin opgave voksen.
Surely the task of this House can only be to consider in detail why the existing measures to implement these treaties are inadequate and what measures must be taken to achieve these objectives in full in the future.
Det, jeg virkelig gerne ville vide fra hr. Clinton Da vis, når han svarer på debatten, er, hvad han vil gøre, hvis han modtager et beroligende, floromvundet svar om, at det selvfølgelig ikke er nogen farlig test — selv om masser af informationer til dato synes at tyde på, at den er det Hvis man siger, at det er et farligt eksperiment, men at man gør sig al mulig omhu, vil kommissæren så sige: »Nej, mange tak, vi giver Dem ikke lov til at gå i gang med det«?
So I am happy to endorse the question to the Commission by Mr Schmid, who asked to what extent it is willing to give this committee of inquiry detailed help in its investigations and help in the hearing of witnesses.
Hr. Smith snakkede om bombemodent plutonium.
will it go by road or rail?
Hvordan kan han vide, at der er bombemodent plutonium i disse affaldstønder?
This Dounreay proposal was condemned by this Parliament.
Medierne! Går fru Ewing ind for Dounreayeksperimentet med hurtigreaktorer?
It was also condemned by the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology.
De er måske ligeglad med arbejdsløsheden i den del af verden?
Is the Commission going to continue reacting to accidents or is it going to take the view that prevention is better than cure?
Gudskelov, hr. formand, oplæste Lord Plumb klart kommissoriet for det nye undersøgelsesudvalg.
When considering transportation of waste it would behove the Commission to avoid this patent absurdity that is being proposed by the UK Government.
Ellers ville fru Bloch von Blottnitz og hr. Ulburghs føre os helt væk fra realiteterne og ind i fantasiens verden.
SMITH (S). — Mr President, I wish to raise the following questions to which I expect the Commissioner to provide answers, in view of the fact that the Com mission has been caught with its trousers embarrassingly down.
Fru Boch von Blottnitz kom med sine sædvanlige vil de udtalelser om kriminel adfærd, om 600 kg plutonium der var oplagret i Mol, og hun talte om en 300 siders erklæring i Hanau, men sagde ikke, hvad den drejede sig om.
Question No 1 : Will the Commissioner responsible for the environment ensure that in future the Commission works fully in conjunction with the IAEA operational safety review teams on safety matters, as it has been proved that it is incompetent to act alone?
Hun siger, at vi alle ved, at atomkraften er ude af kontrol.
There are one or two additional points.
Hendes kon klusion var, at vi må væk fra atomkraft.
Dounreay, although it is near a town, is quite a sparsely populated area.
Har hun holdt sig fra kemikalier efter Sandoz-ulykken?
The sea, the roads and the railways are observable.
Har hun holdt sig fra færger efter Seebrugge-katastrofen?
In an area such as this, everybody tends to know everything that is going on.
Har hun holdt sig fra fly efter et par flyulykker?
They know exactly when waste from Dounreay, for example, went to Sellafield.
Er hun holdt op med at ryge, fordi rygning fører til cancer? Nej!
If you support this proposal, you are supporting a pro position that is of danger to the environment of the whole Community.
Imidlertid er vi modtagere af nukleart nedfald så langt væk fra som Tjernobyl, noget der stadig påvirker fårekødet i Irlands nordlige del, og vi modtager nukleart affald i vore farvande.
Com missioner Clinton Davis explained that Article 34 of the Euratom Treaty requires nuclear operators to con sult with the Commission prior to such dangerous tests as planned at Trawsfynydd.
Nu föreslår man gennemført et ganske særlig farligt eksperiment ikke tres miles fra vor kyst.
I want to know if the British Nuclear Authorities consulted the Commission prior to the test in 1982 and 1986, and if not, why not!
Endnu en gang er vi ikke blevet hørt om det. Vi læser om det i vore søndagsaviser.
Has Article 34 of the Euratom Treaty been violated in the past by the British Government?
Ærlig talt er det for dårligt.
Are they the real lawbreakers?
Hvorfor holder De så ikke op med at ryge?
We simply cannot believe them anymore.
Jeg håber, at undersøgelsesudvalget ikke af De Grønne bliver ført til, uden for sit kommissorium, at svare på vilde spekulationer fra De Grønne og medierne.
When we look up the reports in the newspapers of 30 years ago we learn that in 1957 Ministers told lies.
Lad os holde benene på jorden !
That is what we now know to be the case.
Vandemeulebroucke (ARC). — (NL) Hr. formand, fire spørgsmål til Kommissionen i telegramstil.
Against this background, will the Commission put Dounreay on its agenda for 15 February? ruary?
Mosar, medlem af Kommissionen. — (FR) Hr. for mand, under den netop stedfundne forhandling er der blevet stillet et stort antal spørgsmål til Kommission en.
ROELANTS DU VIVIER (ARC). — (FR) Mr Com missioner, the point of the Transnuklear affair is not simply to denounce a scandal, for it could also have the effect of remedying the existing legal vacuum and placing the situation with regard to the transport of radioactive waste on a healthier footing.
For det første, hvornår bliver der offentlighed om kring inspektionsrapporter? For det andet, hvilket initiativ vil der blive taget for at indføre lovbestemt ansvar i forbindelse med uheld med oplagring, transport og bearbejdning af atomaffald?
There is a 1986 European directive that provides for prior notification of all national authorities, including those of transit countries, concerned in the transport across national frontiers of dangerous toxic waste.
For det fjerde, hvilket initiativ vil der blive taget for at standse uddannelse af teknikere fia tredjelande, der ikke har undertegnet ikke-atomspredningsaftalen ?
Belgium, let it be said, fully complies with, and indeed exceeds, the requirements of this directive, with the exclusion — expressly stipulated in the directive — of radioactive waste.
En stor del af disse spørgsmål er efter min mening allerede blevet delvis besvaret i hr. Clinton Davis' og min egen indledende redegørelse.
My final question is on nuclear safeguards and the failure of Euratom to fulfil its role properly in the past.
Jeg håber, at jeg endelig får et konkret svar på disse fire spørgsmål !
Mr Mosar has totally failed to con vince me that the Euratom safeguards directorate is up to its job.
Hr. formand, jeg takker Dem for, at jeg trods det fremskredne tidspunkt får mulighed for at intervenere i denne debat, som jeg synes har været yderst interessant, selv om der undertiden også blev rettet en forhastet kritik mod vore tjenestegrene og måske også mod Kommissionen.
I want to know, in the light of Euratom's total failure to keep track of the fissile bomb-grade plutonium in the Transnuklear scandal, if he will now release the full safeguards documentation, the so-called facility attachments, for Sellafield, the sub ject of my report in the Energy Committee, so that we can verify if they are worth the paper they are written on?
Denne debat har efter min me ning befundet sig på et højt niveau, og den er yderst nyttig, for så vit som den har givet min kollega og mig selv mulighed for at rydde et par misforståelser af vejen og forsøge på at bringe klarhed over nogle dunkle punkter.
What should be of concern is the fact that the IAEA's Director-General, to whom West Germany is reportedly turning for assistance, made clear when he presented his latest safeguard implementation report to the Board of Governors last June that the safe guards regime could hardly continue to be effective and credible, given the growing amounts of materials and number of facilities.
Nogle af spørgsmålene er som nævnt allerede blevet besvaret i de indledende redegørelser, og jeg skal på forhånd klart sige, at der er nogle detaljer, som jeg ikke skal vende tilbage til i dag for ikke at risikere at komme til at foregribe det parlamentariske udvalgs arbejde og heller ikke gribe ind over Kom-
The present situation is unsatisfactory and I am concerned about the possibility of main taining effectiveness in the future.
Seligman (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, mange talere har draget forhastede konklusioner baseret på oplysninger fra fjernsyn og andre medier, og de er ikke særlig pålidelige. Deres vilde udtalelser er ulykkesprofetier og må som sædvanlig lades ude af betragtning.
Would it not be possible for the Commissioner to pro pose, in view of the forthcoming Council of Ministers for the Environment on 21 March, that the scope of this directive be extended to include radioactive waste, or at the very least that which is not covered by IAEA rules, namely highly radioactive waste?
Det, vi har brug for, er fakta.
So, I repeat, I
Det er medlemsstaternes ansvar.
Mr President, how right he was!
Hvis med lemsstaterne ikke lever op til deres ansvar, skal det så gå ud over Euratom?
I am sure that both the Commissioners who spoke this afternoon and who will be responding and acting on these points will
missionens beføjelser og sagsområder.
it in our Sunday newspapers.
Jeg skal imidlertid forelægge Kommissionen de problemer, der di rekte henhører under dens sagsområde, ved dens møde i morgen.
Evidence suggests that it is an obsolete plant that has come to the end of its days and will, obviously, have to be replaced eventually.
En kort bemærkning til plutonium-problemet : Tilstedeværelsen af plutonium i visse former for affald kan meget vel skyldes en tilfældig kontaminering.
Could he please find out why they have decided to conduct a particularly dangerous test at the end of an obsolete plant's life and why, without any consultation with the Irish Government, who will have a direct and real interest in the results of these tests, we had to find out about the experiment from our Sunday newspapers?
(Protest fra venstre)
VANDEMEULEBROUCKE (ARC). — (NL) Mr President, I have just four short and sharp questions for the Commission.
Jeg skal nu vende tilbage til de spørgsmål, der ligger inden for mit sagsområde, og i overensstemmelse med hr. Clinton Davis' eget ønske overlade til ham at besvare de spørgsmål, der henhører under hans sagsområde. område.
I would like to express my appreciation of the Com missioner's very prompt action in relation to the Trawsfynydd plant in Wales.
Under alle omstændigheder findes dette plutonium kun i meget små mængder i affaldet. Men med hen syn til de 600 kg plutonium, der er oplagret i Belgien, kan jeg svare, at de er underlagt Euratoms sikker hedskontrol.
As you are no doubt aware, this is a cause of enormous concern in my own country, Ireland.
Hvad angår sikkerhedskontrollen, skal jeg minde om, inden for hvilke rammer vi arbejder.
Mr Sherlock referred to Article 34 earlier on in his speech, but he did not have a copy of it in front of him.
Den gælder ikke materialer, der er be stemt til militære formål i de lande, der er i besiddelse af atomvåben, hvilket jo naturligvis medfører visse problemer.
Any Member State in whose territories particularly dangerous experiments are to take place shall take additional health and safety measures on which it shall first obtain the opinion of the Commission.
Den gælder kun materialer, ikke teknologier — og hermed svarer jeg på nogle af spørgsmålene — og den gælder heller ikke teknisk bistand.
I know we are awaiting the Commission's opinion on this particular test which, presumably, it will be informed about very soon.
Jeg kommer nu til Parlamentets undersøgelsesudvalg.
One: when will inspection reports be made public?
I lighed med de ærede medlemmer ønsker også jeg, at dette udvalgs arbejde kan bringe et tilfredsstillende svar på de forskellige spørgsmål, der er rejst her i dag.
Two: what initiatives are being taken to introduce legal liability in respect of accidents involving the storage, transportation and processing of nuclear waste?
Euratoms kontrol har intet at gøre med anvendelsen af foranstaltninger vedrørende fysisk beskyttelse af nukleare materialer.
Four: what initiatives are under way to stop the training of technical personnel from countries which are not signatories of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty?
I Nukem-anlægget er inspektørernes kontrol permanent hele året.
The second part of Article 34 reads:
Men jeg vil rejse dette problem i udvalget i morgen. Jeg er overbevist om, at Kommissionen vil give enhver anmodning fra undersøgelsesudvalget en positiv modtagelse.
The assent of the Commission shall be required where the effects of such experiments are liable to affect the territories of other Member States.
Vi disponerer således over en løbende strøm af informationer, som vanskeligt kan forbedres.
So far we have heard only noncommittal utterances from the Commission.
Der vil blive foretaget analyser af prøverne i nærmeste fremtid.
I trust that I shall now get a concrete answer to these four questions!
Som svar på et andet spørgsmål kan jeg i den forbindelse meddele, at IAEA og Euratoms inspektorat net op her i eftermiddag har truffet aftale om i fællesskab at aflægge et supplerende besøg i de pågældende an læg.
What I would really like to know from Mr Clinton Davis when he replies to the debate is what he will do if he receives a reassuring, soft-spoken answer to the effect that, of course, it is not a dangerous test — though plenty of the information to date seems to sug gest that it is.
Jeg skal ikke undlade at holde Parlamentet un derrettet om resultaterne af denne kontrol.
If they say that it is a dangerous test but that they are taking every possible care, will the Com missioner say 'No, thank you very much, we will not allow you to go on with it'.
Clinton Davis, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, det har været en meget vigtig debat, og den er helt klart meget følsom, både hvad angår hele Fællesskabet og dets forskellige institutioner.
SELIGMAN (ED). — Mr President, many speakers have jumped to conclusions based on television and other media information, and they are very true to form.
Vore inspektører bliver køligt modtaget. Hvordan kontrollen i praksis udøves kan ikke beskrives på et par minutter.
It is the responsibility of the Member States.
Jeg har gentagne gange haft lejlighed til at tilstille formanden for Energi, Forsknings- og Teknologiudvalget dokumenter, der redegør for den anvendte fremgangsmåde ved sikkerhedskontrol.
It has been stated today that all the countries of the Community have nuclear stations in their back yards.
Derfor har jeg i øvrigt foreslået — hvilket jeg har gentaget her i efter middag — at medlemmerne af Parlamentet kan af lægge et orienterende besøg hos de tjenestegrene, der gennemfører denne kontrol.
However, we are the beneficiaries of nuclear fallout from as far away as Chernobyl which is still affecting sheepmeat in the North of Ireland and we are the recipients of nuclear waste in our seas.
Jeg mener ligesom hr.
We read about
Jeg vil gerne vende mig til konkrete bemærkninger, der drejer sig om mit særlige ansvar i Kommissionen.
With regard to safety controls, may I remind you of the framework in which we are operating.
Først spørgsmålet om, at der i dag er et inspektionshold til stede i Mol.
The safe guards system, let us remember, is solely concerned with nuclear material for civil purposes.
Jeg har i det sidste par timer modtaget en meget præliminær og skitseagtig rapport om, hvad der er foregået, men jeg mener, at den er meget vigtig.
It does not cover material involved in the military programmes of those countries that have nuclear weapons, which naturally leads to certain problems, as you know.
Inspektionsholdet omfattede sagkyndige, der dækkede miljø, energi, atomsikkerheds- og transportdirektoraterne i Kommissionen, hvortil kom repræsentanter for sikkerhedsinspektoratet.
It applies only to nuclear material for civil purposes, not to technology —· which answers some of the questions that have been raised — and it does not cover technical assistance either.
Jeg må sige til församlingen, at der — så vidt jeg ved og tror — ikke blev givet nogen informationer om tidligere forsøg eller eksperimenter.
Mrs Bloch von Blottnitz made her usual wild statements about criminal proceedings, 600 kg of plutonium stored in Mol and she talked about a 300-page statement in Hanau, she did not say what it was about.
Det er ganske klart, at vi nu må undersøge, hvad der skete i 1982 og 1986, og det er en sag, som forsamlingen vil ønske at komme tilbage til på et senere tidspunkt.
Did she abandon chemicals after the Sandoz disaster? Did she abandon ferries after the Zeebrugge disaster?
Så kommer jeg til sidst, hr. formand, til en bemærk ning fra fru André, der henviste til et brev, jeg har sendt til ministrene i medfør af artikel 37.
The inspectorate's surveillance of Nukem facilities is conducted on a permanent and year-round basis.
Naturligvis er det ikke et møde i Kommissionen, men et møde for en gruppe sagkyndige.
Why don't you give up smoking then?
Jeg tror, han vil være enig i, at jeg dårligt kan give det løfte i aften, for jeg må vide, hvad der sker, for så vidt angår gruppen af sagkyndige, og orn det kan være modent til Rådets møde i marts.
Nevertheless, in view of the events reported in the press yesterday after noon, Commission inspectors have carried out an additional inspection of the barrels stored at the plant.
Naturligvis er dagens løsen, hvad dette angår, at det haster, og det vil jeg gerne bede forsamlingen acceptere.
Analysis of the samples taken will be completed in the next few days.
Jeg tror, hun tog fejl, og at det var hendes mening at henvise til skrivelser, jeg har afsendt i henhold til artikel 35. Hun spurgte, om brevene sendes rutinemæssigt.
Moreover, to answer another question, I can inform you that agreement has been reached this very after noon between the IAEA and the Euratom inspectorate to carry out a joint supplementary inspection of the plants in question.
Vi har visse rettigheder ifølge artikel 35, men de er begrænsede. De har kun at gøre med tilsyn med kontrolanlæggene.
MOSAR, Member of the Commission. — (FR) Mr President, a large number of questions have been addressed to the Commission in the debate that has just been held.
Jeg skrev til medlemsstaterne og meddelte, at vi ville sende in spektører til anlæggene for at efterkomme forpligtelser, som man havde ladet ligge i en årrække, forpligtelser som jeg under tidligere debatter har tilkendegivet nu skulle opfyldes af Kommissionen.
Most centre on three themes: firstly, the performance of Euratom safety controls; secondly, the problem of waste, and finally, the work of the Committee of Inquiry that Parliament has just set up.
Nogle med lemsstater har endnu ikke svaret, og det er klart, at jeg følger sagen op.
It seems to me that many of these questions have already been answered in the introductory speeches by Mr Clinton Davis and myself.
Jeg tror, hun ved, at det ikke er min vane at krybe udenom.
The manner in which it is conducted in practice cannot be described in a few minutes.
Hr. Schmid kom med en bemærk ning om dette, men jeg tror, der var en eller anden fejl i tolkningen.
I have come to the conclusion that it is not easy for non-specialists to assess in the abstract the efficacy of the methods employed.
I min erklæring om dette spørgsmål sagde jeg, at jeg havde skrevet til ministeren, så såre jeg havde hørt om denne sag, og henledt hans op mærksomhed på kravene i artikel 34, som fru Banotti læste op.
That is why I have proposed — a proposal repeated this afternooon — that members of this Par liament pay a visit to the officials who carry out these inspections to inform themselves of their activities.
Om der bør tillægges Kommissionen bredere beføjelser, er naturligvis et spørgsmål, der vil indebære en udvidelse af Euratom-Traktaten.
As for the problem of waste, that is a point about which I, like you, am extremely concerned.
Jeg må sige til församlingen, at det sand synligvis vil være at tale for døve øren, for så vidt medlemsstaterne angår.
And I think, as Mr Clinton Davis remarked a short time ago, that we need a Commission initiative in this area.
Men der er en oplagt grund til inspektion.
I must stress, however, that that does not imply that at present, anything goes.