natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvad i øvrigt angår informationen, så afgav Sir Leon en første erklæring den 3. april, tror jeg, som også dannede grundlag for en parlamentsbeslutning, og som De ved, er Kommissionen og naturligvis også Sir Leon til enhver tid villig til at afgive en yderligere erklæring, ligesom jeg har gjort det i dag.
For the rest, with regard to information, Sir Leon made an initial statement on 3 April, I believe, which became the basis for a decision of Parliament, and as you know, the Commission and Sir Leon are naturally always ready to deliver further statements, as I have done today.
Men vi må naturligvis have mulighed herfor på grundlag af en beslutning i Parlamentet, og, hr. Ford, hvis Parlamentet ikke giver os denne lejlighed, kan vi ikke afgive en erklæring.
Of course, we have to be given the opportunity of doing so by a decision of Parliament and, Mr Ford, if Parliament does not give us this opportunity, we cannot deliver the statement.
Hvis De altså for fremtiden sikrer Dem plads på dagsordenen hertil, så vil vi gøre det med største fornøjelse.
So if in future you can endeavour to keep a place for it on the agenda, we shall be delighted to deliver it.
Og endnu engang spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt der var tale om en deal. Dette var ikke tilfældet.
Returning to the question of whether a deal or anything of the kind took place — it did not.
Jeg vil gerne endnu engang understrege helt klart, at vi ikke blev informeret om disse yderligere betingelser af den britiske regering, og det er ikke den fremgangsmåde, vi selv følger, eller som vi forventer, at regeringerne følger.
I would clearly state once again that we were not informed of the additional conditions by the British Government, which is not the procedure we ourselves observe and which we expect governments to observe.
Mere kan jeg ikke sige til dette spørgsmål.
I can say no more than that on this point.
Kellett-Bowman (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, i hen hold til artikel 85 i forretningsordenen har folk lov til at fremsætte en bemærkning, når de personligt er blevet angrebet.
KELLETT-BOWMAN (ED). — Mr President, Rule 85 of our Rules of Procedure allow people to make statements when they have been personally attacked.
Parlamentet er desværre her i for middag til en vis grad blevet misbrugt til et person ligt angreb på Lord Young.
Unfortunately this morning the privilege of this House has been abused to some extent by a personal attack on Lord Young.
Det er en skam, at hr. Donnelly, som virkelig har haft en meget fin uge, ødelagde sit indlæg med en ærekrænkende følgeslutning: At Lord Young var yderst foretagsom som handels- og industriminister.
It is a pity that Mr Donnelly who has had a very good week indeed, should have spoilt his speech by the inference which was a slur to the effect that whilst Secretary of State to the Department of Trade and Industry, Lord Young was being highly entrepreneurial.
Jeg er sikker på, at hr. Donnelly forestår brugen af ordet »foretagsom«, og derfor brugte han det.
The meaning of the word 'entrepreneurial' I am sure does not escape Mr Donnelly, which is why he used the word.
Lord Young var bestemt meget foretagsom, inden han blev minister.
Certainly, before he became a Secretary of State Lord Young was highly entrepreneurial.
Men ligesom ganske få andre ministre i verden, hvilket hr. Donnelly sikker vil give mig ret i, modtog han ingen som helst betaling. Som følge af hans tidligere aktiviteter var han en meget velstående mand, men at sige, at han var foretagsom som minister, er ærekrænkende.
But like very few other ministers in the world as Secretary of State, I think Mr Donnelly will find, he did not draw a salary at all.
At vi nu har talt med den britiske regering herom, er dog klart.
It goes without saying that we have discussed these matters with the British Government.
Derfor siger jeg, at det var misbrug af forretningsordenen. Hvis de havde ønsket at få denne redegørelse om fredagen, burde de have fremsat en skriftlig anmodning, såle
We naturally also need an official view on these additional amounts, and I have again explained the substance of the most recent
Formanden. — Dermed er dette punkt på dagsordenen afsluttet ').
PRESIDENT. — The debate is closed
Formanden. — Jeg erklærer Europa-Parlamentets session for afbrudt.
PRESIDENT. — I declare the session of the European Parliament adjourned.
(Mødet hævet kl. 10.30)
(The sitting was closed at 10.30 a.m.)
bruge artikel 56.
I am glad he has decided that he will not be using Rule 56 in future.
Den Socialistiske Gruppe agter at anvende artikel 56, der gør det muligt for os sam men med Kommissionen — og kommissær Bange mann har tydeliggjort, at hen ønsker at fremkomme med en redegørelse — her i Parlamentet at få ting sat på dagsordenen, der, som hr. Patterson sagde, er yderste vigtige.
The Socialist Group intends to apply Rule 56 which allows us, in conjunction with the Commission — and Commissioner Bangemann has made it clear he wants to make a statement — to actually get business on the agenda of this House which,
Pris i Luxembourg (moms ikke medregnet) Årsabonnement 1990­1991: ECU 135
Price (excluding VAT) in Luxembourg: Annual subscription 1990/1991: ECU 135.
Enkeltnummer: Prisen er fastsat i hvert enkelt tilfælde og påtrykt hæftet. Særlige forsendel­sesomkostninger faktureres separat.
Single issue price set accordingly in each case and shown on cover."' ;:' These prices do not include postal charges.
KONTORET FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABERS OFFICIELLE PUBLIKATIONER
* Of > * OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Fuldstændigt referat af møderne fra den 8. til den 12. oktober 1990
Report of proceedings from 8 to 12 October 1990
Mødet mandag den 8. oktober 1990
Sitting of Monday, 8 October 1990
Mødet tirsdag den 9. oktober 1990
Sitting of Tuesday, 9 October 1990
Mødet onsdag den 10. oktober 1990
Sitting of Wednesday, 10 October 1990
Mødet torsdag den 11. oktober 1990
Sitting of Thursday, 11 October 1990
Mødet fredag den 12. oktober 1990
Sitting of Friday, 12 October 1990
Beslutninger, som er vedtaget under moderne fra den 8. til den 12. oktober 1990, bekendtgøres i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende C 284 af 12.11.1990.
Resolutions adopted at sittings of S to 12 October 1990 appear in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 284, 12.11.1990.
MØDET MANDAG DEN 8. OKTOBER 1990
SITTING OF MONDAY, 8 OCTOBER 1990
A3-229/90) af Gil-Robles
A3229/90) by Mr Gil-Robles
Multifiberarrangementet — Uruguay-Runden — Betænkninger (dok.
Multifibre Arrangement — Uruguay — Reports (Doc.
A3-170¡90) af Peijs og (dok.
A3-170/90) by Mrs and (Doc.
A3-215/90) af Stavrou
A3-215/90) by Mr Stavrou
Kommissionens formand og jeg selv var de eneste ikke tyske officielt indbudte.
PRESIDENT. — I declare resumed the session of the European Parliament which was adjourned on 14 September 1990.
Formanden. — Jeg erklærer Europa-Parlamentets session, der blev afbrudt den 14. september 1990, for genoptaget.
I know that I am speaking on behalf of all the Members of this House in sending our sincere congratulations, at this historic moment, to our colleagues in the Bundestag and to the German people as a whole.
Erklæring af formanden
Statement by the
Formanden. — Mine damer og herrer, dette er Europa-Parlamentets første mødeperiode efter Tysklands forening, der fandt sted den 3. oktober i år.
PRESIDENT. — Ladies and gentlemen, this is the first partsession of the European Parliament since the unification of Germany on 3 October.
Efter indbydelse fra præsidenten for Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland og Forbundsdagens formand deltog jeg i de forskellige arrangementer i forbindelse med denne historiske begivenhed.
At the invitation of the Federal Republic of Germany and the President of the Bundestag I took part in the various celebrations held to mark this historical event in the history of Europe.
Formanden. — Vi blev alle dybt bedrøvede over vores kollega Guerriero Ruffinis død. Mario Gio-
PRESIDENT. — We were all deeply grieved to learn of the death of our colleague, Guerriero Ruffini.
Formanden. — Hr. Anastassopoulos, spørgsmålet kan principielt henvises til artikel 36, stk. 5, men på baggrund af det, der skete, har jeg forelagt det for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen.
Commission, preferably through its President, is prepared to make a statement on a very serious matter.
Hr. Ruffini havde en akademisk uddannelse i økonomi og han­delsvidenskab, han var næstformand i Lombardiets Regionalråd og var ligeledes medlem af regionens udøvende organ.
President of the Lombardy Regional Council and a member of the executive of the region.
Ved valgene i juni 1989 blev han valgt ind i Europa­Parlamentet.
He was elected to the European Parliament in June 1989.
Her tilhørte hr. Ruffini Det Europæiske Folkepartis Gruppe.
In this House, Mr Ruffini was a member of the Group of the European People's Party.
Især varetog han hvervet som medlem af Energi­, Forsknings­ og Teknologiudvalget samt Udvalget om Regionalpolitik.
He was also a member of the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology and of the Committee on Regional Policy.
Han var desuden anden næstformand for Delegationen for Forbindel­serne med Machrak­landene.
He was second Vice-President of the delegation for relations with the Mashrek countries.
Mine damer og herrer, jeg anmoder Dem om at iagttage et minuts stilhed til minde om vores kol­lega.
I invite the House to observe one minute's silence in memory of our late colleague.
Som De formodentlig er klar over, hr. formand, er Fællesskabets forhandlingsposition i forhold til dets handelspartnere blevet alvorligt skadet af offentlige stridigheder i Kommissionen.
As you are no doubt aware, Mr President, the Community's ability to negotiate with its trading partners has been seriously damaged by public quarrels and disputes within the Commission.
Stridigheder mellem kommissærer, der ser ud til at strides indbyrdes af politiske årsager har nu den sidste månedstid været genstand for daglige kommentarer i medierne.
Disputes between individual Commissioners who seem to be jostling each other for the high political ground are now the subject — and have been for the past month — of daily comment in the media.
Præ­cise detaljer i Kommissionens forhandlingsstrategi er blevet afsløret til pressen...
The exact details of the Commission's negotiating strategies have been revealed to the press...
Formanden. — Protokollen fra mødet fredag den 14. september 1990 er omdelt.
PRESIDENT. — The Minutes of the sitting of Friday, 14 September 1990 have been distributed.
(Protokollen godkendtes) ')
ANASTASSOPOULOS (PPE). — (GR) Mr President, I just wonder.
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg den som godkendt.
Waiver of parliamentary immunity
Verbeek (V). — (NL) Hr. formand, De har netop udtrykt Deres glæde over Tysklands forening.
VERBEEK (V). — (NL) Mr President, you have just offered your congratulations in connection with German unification.
Jeg vil gerne understrege, at det ikke er alle, der glæder sig over Tysklands forening, navnlig ikke over den måde, hvorpå det hele er sket, og den hastighed, hvormed foreningen har fundet sted.
I should like to make it clear to you that not everyone feels as happy about German unification as you do, particularly when we think of the manner and the haste with which it has come about.
Det er nyttigt, at dette også bliver sagt her.
I think it is important to put that on the record.
Anastassopoulos (PPE). — (GR) Hr. formand, jeg vil blot spørge, om vi behøver afvente svaret fra Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, når der foreligger en præcedens, hvor Parlamentet besluttede at hen­vise betænkningen til fornyet udvalgsbehandling. Jeg mener, at vi ville kunne bruge denne præcedens som grundlag for en beslutning om henvisning af Denys­betænkningen til fornyet udvalgsbehandling i Trans­portudvalget.
PRESIDENT. — I have received from the relevant authorities a request to waive the parliamentary immunity of Mr Pannella.
Anastassopoulos (PPE). — (GR) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne have lov til at tage et problem op, som vedrører en afstemning i Parlamentet torsdag aften under sidste mødeperiode.
ANASTASSOPOULOS (PPE). — (GR) Mr President, allow me to mention a problem that has arisen because of a decision Parliament took in a vote on the Thursday evening of the previous part-session.
Jeg tænker på den afstemning, som forkastede et forslag til lovgivnings­mæssig beslutning i Denys­betænkningen om for­slag fra Kommissionen om oprettelse af en kriseme­kanisme i forbindelse med frigivelsen af transport­markedet.
The vote, that is, rejecting the legislative resolution contained in the Denys report on the proposal from the Commission for the establishment of a crisis mechanism in connection with the liberalization of transport.
Formanden. — Jeg har fra de kompetente italienske myndigheder modtaget en anmodning om ophævelse af Hr. Pannellas immunitet.
This means, in effect, that Parliament has not expressed an opinion on the matter, even though prior to the rejection it had adopted a number of amendments to the Commission's proposal.
I overensstemmelse med artikel 5, stk. 1, i forretningsordenen, er denne anmodning henvist til Udvalget for Forretningsorde­nen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes immunitet.
I do not think it is right that we should not forward an opinion on this matter and I would like to draw attention to a precedent that occurred in March when, at the request of Sir Christopher Prout, it was decided, in a similar case, that a report should be referred back to committee, and to request the House to agree, though I am in some doubt as to whether the Rules will allow it, to the referral back to the Committee on Transport and Tourism of the Denys report so as to ensure that in the end Parliament does express an opinion.
Pannella (NI). — (IT) Hr. formand, må jeg tillade mig at sige to ord om den meddelelse, De har givet.
PANNELLA (NI). — (IT) Permit me to say a word or two, Mr President, on the announcement you have just made.
Jeg tror ikke engang, at Jean­Marie Le Pen endnu er nået op på blot halvdelen af det antal anmodninger om immunitetsophævelse, der er blevet indgivet mod mig i denne periode.
Mr President, I doubt if Jean Marie Le Pen has yet amassed even half the requests for authorization to take court action that I have suffered lately.
I almindelighed har min stilling
The trial of my codefendants is already in progress at this moment in Florence and I am excluded !
Udvalgenes sammensætning: Se proto­
Membership of committees :
') Provelse afmandat ■ kollen.
McCARTIN (PPE). — Mr President, I want to refer to Rule 56 of our Rules of Procedure and to ask if the
Derfor ville jeg bede Dem, hr. formand, om at bistå Udvalget for Forretningsordenen med at afholde et ekstraordinært møde under denne møde periode, så det straks kan ophæve min immunitet, før mine medanklagede bliver dømt eller frifundet.
Mr President, to use the rules so that the Committee can hold an extraordinary meeting this partsession and give me the authorization right away, before my codefendants are condemned or acquitted.
Jeg ved ikke hvorfor, men endnu en gang tillod De hr. Pannella at tale vidt og bredt om et emne, der er arbejdsplanen uvedkommende.
I do not know why, but once again, you allowed Mr Pannella to speak at length on a topic other than the order of business.
De burde have stoppet hr. Pannella og udøvet Deres beføjelser om formand med henblik på at sikre at samtlige medlemmers rettigheder og ikke blot hr. Pannellas respekteres.
You should have stopped Mr Pannella and exercised your presidential powers to assure that the rights of all of us and not just those of Mr Pannella are respected.
Formanden. — Hr. Harrison, jeg anmoder Dem om ikke at fremsætte et »point of desorder«.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Harrison, I would ask you not to make a 'point of disorder'.
Hr. Pannella er jo direkte berørt af anmodningen om ophævelse af immunitet og har ret til at gøre brug af de tre minutters taletid.
In the first place, Mr Pannella is directly affected by the request for a waiver and has the right to speak for three minutes.
Vi ville selvfølgelig have sparet lidt tid, hvis han havde tiet stille. ')
It would have saved some time if you had not spoken. '
McCartin (PPE). -- (EN) Hr. formand, jeg und skylder, at jeg tog ordet i utide, men jeg ønskede at henvise til forretningsordenens artikel 56.
McCARTIN (PPE). — Mr President, I am sorry that I spoke out of turn, but I wished to refer to Article 56 of the Rules of Procedure.
Som jeg fik sagt, ønsker jeg at henlede Parlamentets opmærksomhed på en meget alvorlig sag og spørge, om kommissionsformanden kan give Parlamentet en redegørelse herfor, nemlig Fællesskabets ret til at forhandle med sine handelspartnere uden at skulle være vidne til upassende offentlige stridigheder mel lem enkelte kommissærer, der ser ud til af politiske årsager at strides om problemer vedrørende internationale aftaler.
As I already started to say, I wish to bring a very serious matter to the attention of the House and ask if the President of the Commission could make a statement on it, namely, the Community's right to negotiate with its trading partners without having to witness unseemly public disputes between individual Commissioners who seem to be jostling each other for the high political ground on the question of international agreements.
Disse stridigheder har nu i ugevis været genstand for kommentarer i medierne.
These disputes are now the subject, and have been for weeks, of comment in the media.
Præcise detaljer i Kommissionens forhandlingsstrategier bliver afsløret på en efter min mening højst beklagelig måde, der er til stor skade for Kommissionens image og Fællesskabets interesser.
The exact details of the Commission's negotiating strategies are being revealed in a way which I think is most damaging to the image of the Commission and to the interests of the Community.
Jeg mener, at formanden for Kommissionen har pligt til at give Parlamentet en redegørelse for denne sag.
I believe that the President of the Commission has a duty to make a statement to the House on this matter.
Fællesskabets forhandlingsposition er svækket, og Kommissionens image som kollegial forsamling er blevet plettet.
The Community's ability to negotiate has been damaged and the image of the Commission, which normally should operate as a collegiate body, has been tarnished.
Det er uacceptabelt, at enkelte kommissærer offentligt ret ter beskyldninger mod hinanden og derved skader Fællesskabets image og interesser.
There is no call for individual Commissioners to blame each other in public thereby damaging the image and the interests of the Community in this way.
Formanden. — Fire talere har anmodet om ordet for indlæg til forretningsordenen.
PRESIDENT. — Four Members have asked to speak on points of order.
Først hr. Zeiler.
I shall begin by calling Mr Zeiler.
Under henvisning til hvilken artikel i forretningsordenen anmoder De om ordet?
Under which Rule of the Rules of Procedure do you wish to speak ?
Jeg vil gerne spørge Dem, hr. formand, om der er mulighed for, at Kommissionen, om muligt kommissionsformanden, kan give Parlamentet en redegørelse for denne sag i løbet af ugen.
I would ask you, Mr President, whether the Commission, possibly through its President, could make a statement to the House on this matter during the course of the week.
Formanden. — Hr. McCartin, forslag om ændring af dagsordenen skal være formanden i hænde senest en time, før mødeperioden åbnes.
PRESIDENT. — Mr McCartin, requests to change the agenda should be submitted at least one hour before the opening of the sitting.
Andre medlemmer har efterkommet dette krav i forbindelse med andre emner.
Other colleagues have done this in relation to other items.
Jeg anmoder Dem om næste gang at være mere påpasselig.
I would ask you to be more careful in future.
Zeiler (PPE). — (FR) Jeg tager ordet under henvisning til de artikler, der omhandler Det Udvidede Præsidiums beføjelser.
ZELLER (PPE). — (FR) I am speaking on the rules relating to the competences of the enlarged Bureau.
Det Udvidede Præsidium har i løbet af de seneste uger gjort sig mange overvejelser over tilrettelæggelsen af vort arbejde, hvilket vi må takke for.
During the last few weeks, the enlarged Bureau of our Parliament has thought a great deal about the organization of our work and we should be grateful for this.
Det har bl.a. truffet afgørelse om uden for mødeperioderne at afholde særlige møder i Det Udvidede Præsidium, hvori samtlige medlemmer kan deltage, navnlig med henblik på at påhøre redegørelser fra Kommissionen.
It has taken the decision to break new ground and, particularly, to hold special meetings of the enlarged Bureau outside the part-sessions, which would be open to all the Members of our Parliament in order to hear the members of the Commission in particular.
Alle har en fornemmelse af, at en sådan praksis, der er ny i Parlamen-
Everyone is aware that such a practice, which is new to our institution, raises a whole host of questions.
') Delegationernes betegnelse — Undersøgelsesudvalg — Parlamentets sammensætning — Andragender — Bevillingsoverførsler — Tilladelse til at udarbejde betænkning — Udvalgshenvisninger — Modtagne dokumenter — Forslag til tekster sendt af Rådet: Se protokollen.
Mr President, I should like to ask you to refer the matter to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure — as you are entitled to do — so that it can check the conformity of such a decision. In fact, in our view, complete clarity seems essential in this specific case.
Titley (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg henviser til forretningsordenens bestemmelser vedrørende Europa-Parlamentets delegationer.
TITLEY (S). — Mr President, I refer to our rules governing delegations of this Parliament.
For fjorten dage siden holdt formanden for Europa-Parlamentets Delegation for Forbindelserne med Golfstaterne en
A fortnight ago the chairman of Parliament's delegation to the Gulf States held a press conference in Abu Dhabi in which he said that the European Community would accelerate the Gulf Cooperation Agreement, and that the European Community would have to accept the loss of jobs in the Community which it would cause.
Parlamentets holdning til samarbejdsaftalen med Golfstaterne kom til udtryk i Moorhouse-betænkningen i juli 1990. Efter min mening er det horribelt, at formanden for en af Europa-Parlamentets delegationer på en pressekonference i et fællesskabseksternt land erklærer, at Fællesskabet med glæde nedlægger flere tusind arbejdspladser.
Name of delegations — Committee of inquiry — Membership of Parliament — Petitions — Transfer of appropriations — Authorisation to draw up reports — Referral to committee — Documents received — Texts of Treaties forwarded by the Council: See Minutes.
Det er min faste overbevisning, at Præsidiet på Deres forslag målte med to mål med hensyn til dette.
The draft agenda for this partsession has been distributed.
Dagsordenen
No 3-394/4
Forslaget til dagsorden for denne mødeperiode er omdelt, og der er foreslået eller foretaget følgende ændringer, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 73 og 74:
PRESIDENT included pursuant to Rules 73 and 74 of the Rules of Procedure:
(Formanden oplæste ændringerne af mandagens dags orden) ')
(The President read out the amendments agenda) '
Tirsdag: (Vedrørende betænkning af Romeos)
Tuesday : (On the Romeos report)
Ford (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, vi er indforstået med at behandle Romeos-betænkningen og Ford betænkningen i omvendt rækkefølge og tage Romeos-betænkningen først for at få plads til et indlæg fra Rådets formand, men vi savner en af de indgivne mundtlige forespørgsler, nemlig mundtlig forespørgsel til Udenrigsministrene i Europæisk Politisk Samarbejde.
FORD (S). — Mr President, we are quite happy to swap the Romeos report and the Ford report around to take the Romeos report first so as to fit in with the Italian presidency, but we are missing one of the oral questions that was tabled, namely the oral question to the Foreign Ministers meeting in political cooperation.
Kan De sikre, at denne opføres på dagsordenen?
Can you make sure that it is added to the agenda ?
Den er indgivet rettidigt.
It was tabled in time.
Formanden. — Hvis det er tilfældet, vil forespørgslen blive opført på dagsordenen.
This time, at your suggestion, Mr President, the Bureau has decided to give the floor first to Mr Ford.