natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Allerede den forrige Kommission støttede udkastet til traktat om oprettelse af den europæiske union, det såkaldte Spinelli-forslag. Uden at ville optræde som historiker, er jeg overbevist om, at der uden Spinelliinitiativet aldrig var kommet nogen europæisk fælles akt, det vil sige den ændring af Rom-traktaten, hvor om jeg vil sige et par ord om lidt.
We must endeavour to overcome the obstacles that governments and national parliaments, fearful that this union will override the States' specific interests, have erected in its path, this in the very areas defined as falling within the Member States' competence in the drafts on union that we have approved.
Det er i denne ånd, at vi udtrykker vor enighed med hensyn til de store principper, hvorpå Spinelli-for-slaget hvilede, og hvorpå Fernand Herman, som han sagde, agter at opfordre Parlamentet til at arbejde videre og at gøre en politisk indsats over for regeringerne og den offentlige opinion med tanke på vore børn og børnebørn og det, der skal blive af Europa.
Until such time as a people's Europe has been estab­lished, our Parliament, with its budgetary difficulties and lacking the own resources that are essential in order to work for liberty, for European Union, will be unable to promote its own real development.
Også for medlemsstaternes borgere er EF forblevet et økonomisk anliggende.
For the citizens of the Member States too the Com­munity has remained an economic Community.
Med rette udtrykker man i denne forbindelse bekymring over det svage image, som Europa-Parlamentet har hos borgerne.
Parlia­ment regularly discusses these citizens, and reference is rightly made to the European Parliament's weak public image.
Det lover ikke godt for valgene i 1989.
This does not augur well for the 1989 elections.
Det er derfor også forståeligt, at Herman-beslutningsforslaget i den ne forbindelse taler om nødvendigheden af at gen nemføre en stor oplysningskampagne, og at det i be grundelsen siges, at det endnu er nødvendigt med meget markedsføring for at mobilisere Europas be folkninger til valgene.
It is therefore understandable that the Her­man motion for a resolution should refer in this con­text to the need for an extensive information campaign and for a great deal more of the hard sell to mobilize the peoples of Europe to vote in the elections.
Men må vi ikke frygte, at en sådan strategi hos borgerne mere vil gøre indtryk af et forsøg på at retfærdiggøre sin egen iksistensberettigelse, end den imødekommer borgernes virkelige behov og interesser? Den situation, vi har nu, er, at en over national organisation i praksis har fået en interguvernemental udformning.
But should we not be afraid that a strategy of this kind will give the public the impression that we are trying to justify our own existence rather than respond to their genuine needs and interests?
Derfor må der, hvis Parlamentet ikke vil miste sin troværdighed, være en klar insti tutionel forbindelse mellem Parlamentets medlem mer og deres kolleger i deres oprindelseslands nationale parlament.
Conse­quently, if Parliament does not want to lose its credi­bility, a firm institutional link must be forged between the Members of this Parliament and their colleagues in the national parliament of their country of origin.
Dermed vil bestemte begrundede nationale interesser og eksistensen af europæiske aftaler i deres gensidige afhængighed blive erkendt, og der vil dermed også blive skabt større klarhed for vælger ne.
This will ensure that certain legitimate national interests and the interrelationship of European agreements are recognized and things are made clearer to the electo­rate.
Hr. Herman har i lighed med udvalget om institutio nelle spørgsmål betragtet både det kort, mellem- og langfristede.
For all these reasons, Mr President, we cannot accept the strategy outlined in the Herman report.
Heri synes jeg, at der ligger en illustration af institutionernes forskellige opgaver.
PRESIDENT. — I have received from the Committee on Institutional Affairs a motion for a resolution (Doc.
Hvad nyt ter det at tale om det langfristede, hvis vi ikke afalle kræfter sætter ind på at gøre den fælles akt til en succes uanset dens begrænsninger?
Β 2-500/87) with a request for an early vote to wind up the debate on the oral question (Doc. Β 2-396/87) by Mr Segre and others.
Hvilket formål tjener det at samle al opmærksomhed om den fælles akt uden at tænke på fremtiden, tænke på hvad de øjeblikkelige vanskeligheder kan udvikle sig til.
It is threatened by an imperialism that would have no difficulty in spreading across a denuclearized Europe, which means a neu­tralized and defenceless Europe.
Jeg synes, at denne kombination af kort, mellem- og langfristet aktion bør lede os.
A vote will be taken on this request for an early vote at the end of the debate.
Vi indrømmer gerne Europa-Parlamentet den ledende opgave, hvad angår rollen som foregangsmand med hensyn til det langfristede.
Leaving aside all political considerations, such an atti­tude would mean the end of Europe, and that we can­not, of course, accept.
Hr. formand, af alle disse grunde kan vi ikke gå ind for strategien i Hermanbetænkningen.
DELORS, President of the Commission. — (FR) Mr President, Mr President of the Council, ladies and gentlemen, the Commission has made a point of giving priority consideration to the report and motion for a
For at begynde med det kort- og mellemfristede har Kommissionen med tilfredshed erkendt, at det insti-
(Applause from the benches of the Group of the European Right)
Delors blev ikke så lidt chokeret over i betænkningen at læse, at kun to institutioner til stadighed har virket for integrationen: Domstolen og Parlamentet.
Delors role as co-legislator more firmly than in the past and to demonstrate that it is not concerned exclusively with the long term.
Jeg vil derfor anmode nogle talere om ikke at hælde barnet ud med badevandet og ikke at lægge den fælles akt i graven, før man har prøvet på at få den gen nemført.
I would therefore urge certain speakers not to throw out the baby with the bath water, not to bury the Single Act before having made an effort to implement it.
Er det måske ikke at virke for integrationen at foreslå en sådan faktor for fornyet igangsætning af Fællesskabet som 1992 som mål for det indre markeds gen nemførelse, en tanke der trods alt er slået igennem?
resolution tabled by Mr Fernand Herman on behalf of the Committee on Institutional Affairs.
Og bidrager det ikke til Fællesskabets integration at foreslå en ny metode som de integrerede middelhavsprogrammer til støtte for svage regioner, en metode der allerede har givet så gode resultater, at den har fundet vej til den fælles akt?
It has done so out of regard for the European Parliament, for its his toric and political role, as confirmed by election of its members by universal suffrage, and also, if I may add this point, because of the climate of confidence and cooperation existing between Parliament and the Commission.
Og er det ikke at vise vilje til integration at foreslå en række foranstaltning er med henblik på den fælles akts succes, hvorom alle er enige om at sige, at de udgør et sammenhængende hele?
I can tell you, on behalf of all my col leagues, that the Commission will be lending its sup port to the analytical process and the political task that Parliament is going to undertake along the lines set out very clearly by Mr Herman in his speech.
Jeg kunne godt tænke mig, at vi i de kommende måneder ville betragte Rådet som afslører af objektive vanskeligheder i forbindelse med den europæiske opbygning, lidt i retning af det, som formanden for Det europæiske Råd sagde i formiddags.
The previous Commission lent its support to the draft Treaty establishing the European Union, known as the Spinelli draft.
Skal man angribe institutio nen som sådan? Skal man mene, at denne institutions overskridelse alene skulle være nok til at klare vore vanskeligheder?
Without wishing to set myself up as an historian, I remain convinced that, had it not been for Mr Spinelli's initiative, we would not have had the Single Act, this amendment of the Treaty of Rome, about which I shall have a few words to say shortly.
Jeg vil gentage det, som en taler, hr. Nord, sagde for lidt siden, nemlig at hvis man ser på Europas historie de sidste tredive år, så er det en udvikling, der er præget af fremskridt, kriser, stagnation, og ofte er der sket fremskridt, når europæerne have følelsen af en trussel, ja en tvang udefra.
It is in this spirit that we affirm our agreement with the main principles on which the Spinelli draft was founded and on the basis of which Mr Fernand Her man intends, as he confirmed, to invite Parliament to work, conducting a political campaign to carry the day with the governments and public opinion, ever-mindful of our children and grandchildren and of what Europe stands to become in future.
Når det er sagt, hvorfor går Europa da ikke hurtigere frem?
That said, why is Europe not moving forward more quickly?
Jeg tror ikke, at vi er færdige med vore over vejelser og analyser på dette punkt, og for øvrigt er det af hr. Seeler for udvalget om institutionelle spørgsmål stillede spørgsmål om Kommissionens udøvende beføjelser der for at minde os derom.
In my view, we have not yet come to the end of our analysis of this point, and moreover the question about the Commission's powers of implementation, tabled by Mr Segre on behalf of the Committee on Institutional Affairs, is there to remind us.
Det er nu flere måneder siden, at Rådet fik forelagt et af de vigtigste aspekter af den fælles akt, som ikke har til formål at give Kommissionen nye beføjelser, men at give Fællesskabet mulighed for mere effektivt at udøve sine beføjelser gennem Kommissionen som udøvende instans.
It is several months now since the Council was asked to con sider one of the important parts of the Single Act, the aim of which is not to give new powers to the Com mission but to allow the Community to exercise its powers more effectively through its executive arm, the Commission.
Jeg kan fortælle Dem, at terningen endnu ikke er kastet, og at Kommissionen i betragtning af de fremdeles bestående vanskeligheder vil træffe sin beslutning i sidste øjeblik og enten trække sit forslag tilbage eller acceptere et kompromis, som ikke tilfredsstiller Europa-Parlamentets udvalg om institutionelle spørgsmål, men jeg tror, at vi kun får valget mellem to ulemper, for ondets rod er til trods for det belgiske formandskabs og ikke mindst Core-per-formandens fremragende indsats mangel på tillid til Kommissionen.
I can tell you that the die is not yet cast and that, given the difficulties outstanding, the Com mission will decide at the last moment either to with draw its proposal or to accept a compromise which the European Parliament's Committee on Institutional Affairs will not find satisfactory, but I think we are going to be left to choose the lesser of two evils, because the root of the problem, despite the outstanding efforts made by the Belgian Presidency and the Coreper Chairman in particular, is the lack of confidence in the Commission.
Denne manglende tillid er så me get desto mere forbavsende, som Det europæiske Råd — selv om det ikke står skrevet — til enhver tid kan lade Kommissionens sytten medlemmer forstå, at de gør deres arbejde dårligt, hvorfor de i anstændighedens navn bør trække sig tilbage.
This lack of confidence is all the more extraordinary in that the European Coun cil is free at any time, even though there is nothing in the texts to this effect, to tell the 17 Members of the Commission that they are not doing their jobs properly and the honourable thing is for them to resign.
Det er så meget desto mere forbavsende, som Europa-Parlamentet selv kan vedtage et mistillidsvotum til Kommission en.
It is all the more surprising in that the European Parliament itself can vote a motion of censure on the Com mission.
Man kan dårligt forestille sig, hvordan en virksomhed eller endog en national regering skal kunne fungere i et sådant mistillidsklima mellem to vigtige organer.
You could scarcely imagine how a business or even a national government could operate in such a climate of distrust between two of its key component parts.
Det er beklageligvis således, at spørgsmålet melder sig.
Unfortunately, those are the terms in which the question has to be considered.
Jeg må sige til hr. Herman, at Kommissionen
It is, I believe, by this combination of short or mediumterm action and longterm action that we must be guided.
Jeg kan fortælle Dem, at det, der i dag udgør det ind re markeds styrke, er, at virksomhedslederne, de an satte og fagbevægelsen føler den økonomiske tilbage gangs trussel.
To start with the short and medium term, the Com mission noted with satisfaction that the Committee on Institutional Affairs is inviting Parliament to concentrate on seven priorities, which I quote in the order in which they appear in the report: the internal market, the budget, the common agricultural policy, the environment, research and technology, monetary integration, and cohesion.
Man har, som De siger, hr. Herman, på nationalt plan prøvet alt for at genfinde fremgangen, skabe arbejdspladser og sikre solidariteten, men det lykkes ikke mere.
These are just the areas where act ion can be taken to make a success of the Single Act.
Det står for øvrigt i den første betragtning.
As for the cooperation procedure, it should be taken by Parliament as the opportunity to assert itself in its
Men der bør også tages hensyn til følgen de elementer: Udefra kommende trusler eller internationale parametre som øst-vest-forbindelsernes ud vikling.
The Commission therefore examined the proposals in this interim report with great interest, during a long discussion to which my colleague Mr Ripa di Meana will be referring shortly as well.
Det forekommer mig altså, at vi i de kom mende måneder har interesse i at uddybe de objektive årsager, der kan forklare, hvorfor Europa ikke udvikles hurtigt nok eller så galt hvorfor Europa, når noget er besluttet, ikke kan få det gennemført.
I have to tell Mr Her man that it was nevertheless taken aback to read in the preamble to the report: 'only two institutions have continued to play their integrating role: the Court of Justice and Parliament'.
Delors bindelse vil et direkte valgt Europa-Parlaments rolle blive afgørende for unionens udvikling. «
Delors being extended under the Single Act?
Vi er som Europa-Parlamentet foruroligede over den tanke, at de kom mende europæiske valg ikke får noget klart mål. Man kan ikke have demokrati uden læselighed, uden transparens.
Is it not showing a commitment to integration to propose a series of measures aimed at making a success of the Single Act, measures which everyone agrees make up into a coherent whole?
Borgerne skal forstå, hvad der foregår, ellers mister de naturligt nok interessen derfor.
While I do not expect the Commission to receive excessive credit, I do not want to see excessive opprobrium attached to it either.
De bedes ven ligst undskylde, at jeg ikke kan blive til forhandlingens afslutning, men jeg skal detage i et møde i poli tisk udvalg kl. 17.30.
I have to apologize to you for not being able to stay until the end of the debate, but I have to attend the meeting of the Political Affairs Committee at half past five.
Jeg vil nøje læse referatet af Deres forhandlinger.
I shall make a careful reading of the report of your proceed ings.
Herman (PPE), ordfører. — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg vil først og fremmest sige til hr. Delors, at jeg, da jeg talte om integrationen, tænkte på det institutionelle plan.
What I have just said about the Commission could also, paradoxically, be said of the Council, since the Council is an institution and, as is only to be expected, there are conflicts and tensions between institutions, just as there are tensions, within a national govern ment, between the finance minister and a spending minister.
Alle mine kolleger i udvalget om institutionelle spørgsmål er de første til at erkende Kommissionens fortjeneste i dens daglige rolle og på kort sigt, således som De påpegede det, i for bindelse med det generelle integrationsarbejde.
I think it would be well if we looked upon the Council over the coming months as a source of knowledge about the objective difficulties of building Europe, somewhat along the lines of this morning's speech by the President of the European Council.
Men jeg placerede mig på institutionelt plan, og det var måske en smule uretfærdigt, at jeg ikke anerkendte det, De allerede har gjort.
Is it right to attack the institution as such? Is it right to think that outflanking this institution would be enough in itself to cope with the difficulties facing us?
Hr. formand, jeg er glad for, at Deres institution er gået i gang med at præcisere sine overvejelser med henblik på fastlæggelse af en strategi for oprettelse af den europæiske union.
Mr President, I am delighted that your institution has gone through the exercise of clarifying its thinking in order to define a strategy for achieving European Union.
Jeg har med interesse sat mig ind i hr. Hermans betænkning for udvalget om insti tutionelle spørgsmål.
I read the report prepared by Mr Fernand Herman on behalf of your Committee on Institutional Affairs with interest.
Hr. Tindemans, De citerede Jean Monnet, og heraf udleder jeg, at Deres svar skulle være positivt.
I shall of course attach full weight to the resolution adopted on it by the European Parliament.
Rent personligt vil jeg allerede nu gerne have lov til at sige, at jeg er enig i, at den fælles akt endnu ikke er den europæiske union, og at vi fortsat bør overveje hvilke midler, vi skal bruge til gennemførelse deraf. Det har jeg gjort i årevis.
Speaking personally, let me say straight away that I agree that the Single Act is not yet the European Union, and we have to go on working out ways of achieving it.
Som bevis herpå behøver jeg blot at henvise til min rapport om den europæiske union.
Witness my report on the European Union.
Selvfølgelig bør vi først og fremmest gøre alt for at sikre den fælles akts succes.
We must of course do everything to ensure the success of the Single Act.
Det er Parlamentet da også besluttet på, idet det i sin beslutning af 16. januar 1986 erklærede, at Europa-Parlamentet vil ud nytte den fælles akts muligheder til den yderste grænse. se.
This is the position your institution took in its resolution of 16 Januar)· 1986, in which it declared that 'the European Parliament will exploit to the very limit the possibilities offered by the Single Act'.
Tindemans, Toraan for Rådet. — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg protesterer.
This is actually what you say in your first recital.
At give mig en sådan udfordring i så mange specialisters nærværelse er for meget for mig, der i sin tid støttede Bertrans-betænkningen, som Parlamentet vedtog.
But it is also necessary to take account of such factors as threats from outside or international parameters, such as developments in East-West relations.
Jeg ved ikke, om alle Parlamentets medlemmer husker det, men jeg var en varm til hænger af denne betænkning.
One need only take the example of the Single Act, which is regarded by some people as amounting to very little.
Jeg er indforstået med, at man overdrager Parlamentet udarbejdelse af pro jekter.
It nevertheless took referendums in two Member States before it could be implemented.
Efter den fælles akt kommer den europæiske union.
Beyond the Single Act, there is European Union.
Da jeg i 1975 sendte mine kolleger i Det europæiske Råd min rapport, skrev jeg: »Den europæiske union er for mig en ny fase på vejen mod Europas samling, som kun kan blive resultatet af en kontinuerlig pro ces.
In 1975, when forwarding my report to my colleagues in the European Council, I wrote: 'I see European Union as a new stage on the path to unification of Europe, which only a continuous process can achieve.
Derfor er det vanskeligt allerede nu at fastsætte en tidsfrist derfor.
It is therefore difficult at this point to set a date for European Union.
Målet kan kun nås ved hjælp af institutioner, der er tilpasset de nye behov.
It will attain its objectives only if there are institutions suited to its new needs.
Således vil det kun være ved hjælp af styrkede og forbedrede institutioner, at unionen fremover bliver i stand til at udtrykke sin egen dynamik i højere grad. I denne for
It is indeed through strengthened and improved institutions that this Union will be able increasingly to express its own dynamism.
Men jeg er ikke sikker på, at alle ministrene, alle Rådets medlemmer, godkender det med det samme.
Like it, we are disturbed at the prospect of there being no clear objective in the next European elections.
At Parlalentet har sit ord at skulle have sagt ved udformningen af den europæiske union, det siger ef ter min opfattelse sig selv!
CLINTON (PPE). — Mr President, this Parliament has always supported progress towards the political union of European states.
bør vi gøre en indsats for at overflødiggøre sådanne undtagelser i fremtiden gennem større økonomisk til nærmelse.
I am quite certain that your action, your action today and tomorrow, will be deci sive in the construction of a real European Union.
Fuldførelsen af det indre marked er af vital betydning for et lille land som Irland, som er afhængigt af eks port af så stor en del af produktionen.
Our solid commitment as a Parliament to the ultimate goal of European Union gives us the moral authority to attempt to push forward again.
Der er også behov for en fordobling af de sociale og regionale fonde for at støtte os i vores bestræbelser få at styrke vor økonomi og hale ind på de stærkere medlemslande.
The immediate need is for us to exploit fully the possibilities opened up by the ratification of the Single Act, but we must also set the stage for a new initiative.
Clinton (PPE). — (EN) Hr. formand, dette parlament har altid støttet fremskridt hen imod den politiske union mellem Europas stater. Det var vort udkast til traktat om den europæiske union, som gav stødet til Den europæiske fælles akt.
As Mr Herman rightly points out in his report, we need to inform public opinion, we must involve national governments and par liamentary authorities in our work so that we can have a realistic chance of taking a further step forward during the mandate of the next elected Parliament.
Romera I Alcazar (ED). — (ES) Hr. formand, hr. kommissionsformand, tillad mig at begynde mit ind læg med at konstatere noget allerede kendt, men ikke af den grund mindre væsentligt.
HERMAN (PPE), rapporteur. — (FR) Mr President, I should first like to tell Mr Delors that when I spoke of an integrating role, I was thinking in institutional terms.
Jeg tænker på den kendsgerning, at Det europæiske økonomiske Fælles skabs overgang til europæisk union bør finde sted — og kun kan finde sted — ud fra en solidarisk hold ning, hvis vi ønsker, at overgangen skal blive en succes.
All my fellow members of the Committee on Institutional Affairs unhesitatingly recognize the mer its shown by the Commission in its day-to-day, shortterm role in pursuing integration on the general level, the role that you stressed.
Det, vi skal gøre lige i øjeblik ket, er at udnytte de muligheder, ratificeringen af fællesakten giver, i fuldt omfang, men vi må også gøre klar til at tage et nyt initiativ.
But I was thinking in institutional terms, and was perhaps a little unjust in failing to acknowledge what you have already done.
Negative kommentarer her i dette parlament og an dre steder har givet et noget forvansket billede af mit lands holdning til den europæiske union.
A somewhat false impression of the attitude of my country towards European Union has been created by negative comments made in this Parliament and else where.
Jeg håber, at udfaldet af folkeafstemningen i Irland nu har overbevist Dem helt fuldstændigt om, at vi ikke alene føler os forpligtede af fællesakten, men til stadighed vil være at finde blandt de lande, som ønsker yderligere integration og yderligere tilnærmelse blandt Fælles skabets medlemslande.
I hope that the outcome of the referendum in Ireland has now convinced you beyond any shadow of doubt that we are not only committed to the Single Act but will remain amongst those countries seeking further integration and cohesion between the Member States of the Community.