natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der var faktisk tale om en sag, hvor en af vor finansministers nærtstående rådgivere var involveret såvel som pårørende til statschefen selv.
She claims that ionization would destroy 70 % of vitamins and all amino-acids and would lead to the formation of toxins in food.
Disse personer ville ikke direkte blive omfattet af begrebet primær insider i den udformning, vi ser i den foreliggende tekst.
Mrs Quistorp also says that several countries, such as New Zealand, Sweden and Australia, have banned ionisation.
Jeg påstår naturligvis ikke, at alle socialister er uhæderlige, langt fra, men både inden for national ret og fællesskabsret ses det ofte, at der efter en sådan transaktion foreslås en ny lovgivning.
On the other hand, the World Health Organization and the FAO have recently produced a joint report very favourable to ionization.
Efter ovennævnte skandale fremsattes der i Frankrig forslag om en ændring af loven om retsstridig insiderhandel af 2. august 1989.
This year too the World Health Organization replied to questions from the International Consumers' Organization.
Efter hver skandale i forbindelse med politiske partiers finansiering, hvor det socialistiske parti har været involveret, fremsættes der forslag om en ny udgave af loven om politiske partiers finansiering. I Frankrig står vi nu med den tredje af slagsen.
In the United States the Food and Drug Administration, which has a reputation for being extremely strict, also concluded in its 33 page-report published on 30 De cember 1988 that ionization was not harmful.
Anastassopoulos (PPE). — (GR) Hr. formand, jeg tror ikke, det er nødvendigt her at analysere den vigtige rolle, som fondsbørserne spiller på det frie marked, og jeg vil heller ikke sige mere om det slag, som rammer hele dette system, når indehaverne af intern viden, direkte eller indirekte, udnytter denne til deres personlige vinding, til andres vinding eller — hvad der er det mest almindelige — til begge formål.
I welcome scientific research on this question and the incorporation of scientific results into Community texts ; I am in favour of the Commission proposal and reject the amendments tabled by the Commission on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection which aim to introduce a ban on ionization and risk falling back on chemical treatment which is a hazard to the environment and public health.
Der er i disse tilfælde tale om et betydeligt slag, de sådanne aktiviteter naturligvis vil rolle ved investorernes tillid til fondsbørsen og til det frie marked generelt.
Dare I say that until presented with evidence to the contrary, I would still trust the report of the World Health Organization and the Food and Drug Administration ?
Jeg drister mig derfor til at håbe, at de strafferetlige sanktionsmuligheder vil blive tilstrækkeligt effektive til, at direktivet overholdes.
WEBER (S). — (DE) Mr President, I should like to ask the previous speaker a question. I would like to know who in this House is confusing ionizing radiation with making foodstuffs radioactive.
Jeg håber især, at disse tekster vil blive respekteret af dem, der i det offentlige apparat eller i staten, navnlig den socialistiske stat, har til opgave at forvalte fællesskabets interesser og ikke at berige sig på befolkningens bekostning. ning.
I simply cannot stand any more of this false assumption. We know exactly what we are talking about because we have been working on this subject for the last ten years.
Pacheco Herrera (ARC). — (ES) Hr. formand, mellem 80 og 90% af børstransaktionerne er efter vores mening baseret på insider-information.
In this context I think that the numerous precautions taken by the Commission are sensible and sufficient, precautions such as limiting the list of foodstuffs which may be ionized, approving the ionization installations and having them supervised by an inspectorate, covering third countries as well, and such as labelling ionized food with a special logo not only for the end consumer but also for intermediaries.
De store investeringer foretages i dag af handlende med værdipapirer, og der ses mange skandaler i lande som Spanien, Frankrig og Italien for ikke at tale om andre.
Ladies and gentlemen, salmonella, listeria or other microbes and mildews are still rife today. If ionization proves a better method of preservation than chemical or heat treatment, why ban it ?
Vi står efter vores mening midt i et boom af børstransaktioner baseret på insider-information.
GREEN (S). — Mr President, I rise to speak as someone who, before my election to this Parliament in June, worked very closed and in some depth with consumer movements in the United Kingdom and across Europe.
Derfor er en regulering som den foreliggende nødvendig, men endnu mere nødvendigt er det, at der udarbejdes statslige regler og forskrifter af straf feretlig, og ikke blot administrativ, karakter, idet det er muligt at unddrage sig bestemmelser baseret på en adfærdskodeks.
Therefore, I have very first-hand and recent experience of the very deeply held views of traders and consumers — and I repeat traders and consumers — when it comes to this proposal on food irradiation.
Sidsnævnte fører ingen steder hen. Medlemsstaterne må sætte en stopper for deres slingrekurs og udarbejde et klart og præcist regelsæt.
ELMALAN (CG). — (FR) Mr President, the report presented by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection wrongly assimilates ionizing food to irradiation proper, thereby concluding that this method of preservation should more or less be banned.
Nogle råder over love, f.eks. mit land, men de bringes aldrig i anvendelse på grund af sådanne reglers ligegyldighed.
This distorted version of reality is unacceptable ; the facts must be re-established on the basis of scientifically proven data subject to the control of international organizations, as the previous speaker has said.
I en tid, hvor vi går mod et forenet indre marked i Fællesskabet og følger udviklingen på fondsbørserne i flere af medlemslandene, må vi forsøge på alle mulige måder at begrænse dette problem.
It has been said in this debate that, while considering this proposal, we should not be guided by an emotional, gut response but must take a careful and considered look at the medical and scientific evidence before us before we make our judgment.
Alle er enige om, at Kommissionens initiativ fortjener ros, selv om det har været forsinket, og det tog næsten tre år for os at nå den sidste fase.
Yet, for every argument we have heard in favour, for every scientist who speaks in favour, we hear another argument and another equally eminent scientist speaking against.
Jeg mener, at Parlamentet har spillet en rolle i løbet af dette tidsrum, og det er mig en glæde at kunne sige, at jeg helt kan tilslutte mig ordføreren, hr. Geoffrey Hoons betragtninger, — hr. Hoon, som med sin første betænkning har betydet meget for Parlamentets standpunkter — om, at såvel Kom missionen som Rådet denne gang har accepteret særdeles mange af de ændringsforslag, som Europa-Parlamentet havde stillet.
Where does that leave us as parliamentarians when it comes to actually making a decision on this proposal. It is clear that we cannot easily find a definitive scientific view, so it is incumbent on us to find another frame of reference within which to make our political judgment.
Formålet med disse ændringsforslag var at gøre direktivforslaget endnu strengere og udvide dets anvendelsesområde for således at begrænse den illoyale anvendelse af intern viden mest muligt.
International legislation on the ionization of food does indeed differ widely, and it is undoubtedly desirable to harmonize it. Some countries, such as France, have been using this method for more than 20 years on an ever increasing range of products.
Og både Kommissionen og Rådet har taget skridt i denne retning.
It decontaminates foodstuffs and enhances their shelf-life.
I de to punkter, hvor de ikke har fulgt hr. Hoons oprindelige betænkning, må vi erkende, at der er visse lovmæssige problemer.
Many top-level scientific works have proved that this method is effective and harmless, but the committee report fails to refer to them.
Gennemførelsen af dette direktiv og skabelsen af retsbestemmelser i de lande, hvor disse endnu ikke
I believe we must remember that we are here to make decisions on behalf of the people of Europe.
Derfor vil vi i hovedtrækkene støtte hr. Hoons betænkning med de deri indeholdte ændringsforslag, men vi savner en seriøs holdning fra medlemsstater nes regeringers side, hvis det skal blive muligt at rykke det skandaløse fænomen børstransaktioner på basis af insider-information op med rode.
Our people need to be confident that, as we move to a single market, their health, wellbeing and safety are of paramount importance to this Parliament and to its Members.
') Debat om aktuelle og uopsættelige spørgsmål af væsentlig betydning (bekendtgørelse): se protokollen.
So that should be the determining factor in the debate on this issue: how does the consuming public feel about this proposal ?
(Modet udsat kl. 13.00 og genoptaget kl. 15.00)
I believe I can speak with some
Anastassopoulos findes — som f.eks.
I was in Geneva nine years ago and took a look at an IAEO exhibition.
Grækenland, hvor jeg kommer fra — samt oprettelsen af de relevante tjenestegrene, så vi kan afsløre disse ulovligheder, tror jeg vil føre til, at vi opnår langt bedre resultater.
I found it irresponsible the way it was suggested, particularly to uninformed consumers, scientists and Third World representatives, that irradiation makes food safe and last a long time.
Ud fra denne betragtning støtter Det Europæiske Folkeparti hr. Hoons standpunkter med ovennævnte forbehold.
Once again, I urge you to take the committee's arguments seriously in the interests of consumers in the Community's large internal market and in the interests of consumers in Eastern Europe and the Third World.
stilles netop nu. De kriterier med hensyn til søgsmålskompetence, der fremsættes i den fælles holdning, er på dette punkt nøjagtig de samme, som var indeholdt i Kommissionens oprindelige forslag.
experience in this area and I can say that there is enormous anxiety and unhappiness about the possible extension of the process of irradiation throughout the Community.
Og under førstebehandlingen i Parlamentet blev der ikke foreslået nogen sådan ændring. Jeg vil gerne forklare, hvorfor dette ændringsforslag er nødvendigt.
In the United Kingdom, for instance, many of the largest retail businesses have made it quite clear that, in view of the enormous consumer resistance, and while there is no test that will show categorically whether or not a food has been irradiated, they will not stock or sell foodstuffs that have been irradiated.
I henhold til den fælles holdning er alle handlinger, der foretages af en insider i en medlemsstat, omfattet af forbuddet i dette direktiv. Dette princip er helt klart udtrykt i artikel 5 i den fælles holdning.
We must ask ourselves whether this process is needed by the food industry or wanted by the consuming public; it is not just a matter of whether it is scientifically safe.
Endvidere stemmer kriterierne med hensyn til jurisdiktion overens med direktivets generelle hensigt, ifølge hvilken enhver insider-transaktion, der foretages i et medlemsland, henhører under det pågældende lands jurisdiktion, hvorved det pågældende lands marked får en passende beskyttelse.
In an age when we are seeking to reduce artificial methods of food processing, when we are trying to encourage a return to chemical-free farming, when we are removing additives and colourings, we must ask ourselves whether we need yet another process the long-term effect of which is, at best, speculative.
Van Miert, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, først vil jeg gerne komplimentere Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder og i særdeleshed dets ordfører, hr. Hoon, for deres generelle støtte til den fælles holdning om insider handel.
I believe that, if there are any doubts or uncertainty, and if it is clear that consumers are opposed, then it is our responsibility to err on the side of caution.
Denne betænkning er så meget mere tilfreds stillende, som forhandlingerne i Rådet har været meget vanskelige.
We should be moving with great sensitivity and caution, sensitive to the perceptions, fears and anxieties of the public.
Det kompromis, man er nået frem til, er udtryk for en skrøbelig balance mellem de forskellige medlemsstater.
I would ask this Parliament at this session to support the amendments of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection.
Men jeg kan sige, at Kommissionen er glad for de resultater, man har nået i den fælles holdning.
VAN MIERT, member of the Commission. — (NL) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen.
Faktisk vil det, at man vedtager direktivet i den form, hvori det er vedtaget af Rådet, udgøre et stort fremskridt, når det gælder at beskytte investorerne og sikre, at markederne for værdipapirer inden for Fællesskabets stadig mere integrerede marked for finansielle tjenesteydelser kommer til at fungere ordentligt.
First of all I wish to apologize for the absence of my colleague Mr Ban gemann who is attending a Council of Ministers meeting in Luxembourg today on the internal market.
Kommissionen har ikke ment, at det ville være tilrådeligt at godkende Parlamentets forslag om, at der skal ske en harmonisering af straffebestemmelserne, for det ville på upassende måde gribe ind i medlemsstaternes straffe retspleje, som henhører under de nationale parlamenters jurisdiktion.
He asked me to reply on his behalf and on behalf of the Commission to this debate in Parliament and to give the Commission's view on the amendments which have been tabled. In doing so I shall try to be as objective as possible although this is an extremely important and delicate issue.
Med hensyn til de grænseoverskridende transaktioner inden for Fællesskabet, så er de underlagt bestemmelserne i artikel 10 om samarbejde mellem medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder.
QUISTORP (V), rapporteur. — (DE) Mr President, I should like to take up Mrs Weber's question — and in this I am in agreement with the majority of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection — by reminding you of the debate that took place in this House in May of this year.
Dette samarbejde sigter på sager, hvor insideren er bosiddende i en anden medlemsstat end den, hvor transaktionen foretages.
Although I was not here at the time, I have read the record.
Enhver handling, der blev foretaget uden for Fællesskabets territorium af en insider, der var bosiddende inden for Fællesskabet, ville falde inden for direktivets rammer.
Mr Bangemann accused the committee and the experts on the committee — for the umpteenth time — of confusing the irradiation of food with radioactive contamination or enrichment.
Kommissionen er generelt imod regler af ekstraterritorial karakter.
We are fully aware that this is not the same thing, even if it is a major problem for us.
Og vi har med held bekæmpet pression fra tredjelande, der ønskede at påtvinge os deres jurisdiktion. Det er en yderligere grund til ikke at acceptere dette ændringsforslag.
The main problem we have with the irradiation of food is knowing how much nutritional value it still has, how far it retains its vitamins, whether the consumer is buying really fresh food or only something that looks fresh and how far the irradiation of food is technologically necessary, because there are enough alternative or traditional methods of preservation.
Før vi i detaljer ser på de stillede ændringsforslag, tror jeg, det vil være nyttigt at henlede Deres opmærksomhed på et vigtigt træk ved den fælles holdning; den fastsætter minimumsbestemmelser.
You will remember, ladies and gentlemen, that Mr Bangemann gave his opinion on this proposal during the partsession last May and explained clearly the Commission's position.
Det står medlemsstaterne frit for at anvende strengere bestemmelser, hvis de ønsker det.
Mrs Quistrop's report completely incorporates the amendments approved in the report from the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection.
Derfor har medlemsstaterne på de to områder, hvor der i ind stillingen foreslås ændringer, mulighed for at bringe strengere bestemmelser i anvendelse.
But some new elements have come to light since discussing this issue in May.
Virkningen af ændringsforslagene vil være at forvandle det. der i øjeblikket er en mulighed for medlemsstaterne, til et påbud.
Following Parliament's opinion on the amend ments to the directive on labelling foodstuffs, the Commission proposed indicating possible ionization treatment clearly on the label.
Af denne såvel som af andre grunde, som jeg vil komme tilbage til om lidt, anser Kommissionen disse ændringsforslag for at være unødvendige.
The Council adopted this proposal on 14 June. The amendment to the directive means that from 20 June 1992 any food treated by ionization must have that clearly stated on the label.
Direktivet er helt effektivt i sin nuværende udformning, uden dem. Desuden frygter vi, at medtagelse af disse to ændringsforslag vil bringe den endelige vedtagelse af direktivet i Rådet i alvorlig fare.
The directive further stipulates that regulations on teporting the ionization of ingredients used for the preparation of foodstuffs will be determined by the Council on a proposal from the Commission, in accordance with Article 100 A, namely in cooperation with Parliament.
På disse to punkter afviger de forskellige medlemssta ters opfattelse særlig meget.
The Commission's proposal will be based on a high degree of consumer protection.
Den fælles holdning udgør et skrøbeligt kompromis.
This will also guarantee proper information of the consumer.
For nu at se nøjere på detaljerne i ændringsforslagene, så vil jeg for det første gerne fremsætte nogle bemærkninger om den foreslåede udvidelse af med lemsstaterens jurisdiktion som formuleret i artikel 5.
At a time when, happily, more and more people are waking up and making a very clear distinction between the new technologies we really need and various good old methods we can revert to, we should do what Parliament has already demanded of the Commission, and that is carry out a detailed study to be submitted to the public on methods of preservation which are alternatives to the irradiation of food.
Det er måske overraskende, at dette ændringsforslag
Many people may think that we are acting only in the interests of environmental protection and of consumers, which might be opposed to certain economic interests,
Det gjaldt derfor ikke for hele rækken af sekundære insidere.
In general terms ionization of
García Amigo (PPE). — (ES) Hr. formand, jeg går ind for, at betænkningen henvises til fornyet udvalgsbehandling.
Nevertheless we cannot deny that this little used and little known preservation process has given rise to public disquiet among consumers.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok.
Mr President, that brings me to the other amendments.
A3-29/89) af Quistorp for Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse om
Like all other directives on foodstuffs, this one is legally comprehensive and covers all relevant matters.
Den fælles holdning udvider nu direktivets område, så hele rækken af sekundære insidere får forbud mod at handle.
That is .why although I must reject Amendments Nos 2 and 13,1 can assure the House that pursuant to the resolution of March 1987 the directive effectively bans the ionization of all foodstuffs except those listed in annexe 1 which I have just read out.
Følgelig er mangelen blevet afhjulpet.
This list is even shorter than what was originally proposed.
Det vil derfor være overflødigt at opretholde disse forbud.
The Commission's proposal contains a positive list, which means that in practice there may be no trade in any ionized food which is not mentioned on this list.
I denne forbindelse vil jeg også gerne understrege, at visse medlemsstater ville begrænse rækkevidden af direktivet, så det kun gjaldt for primære insidere, og den nuværende holdning repræsenterer derfor et nyttigt fremskridt.
The list includes a number of products which are already ionized in some Member States or which are being considered for such treatment.
Af de grunde, jeg lige har anført, er Kommissionen ude af stand til at acceptere de to ændringsforslag, som Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder har stillet i indstillingen til andenbehandling.
You know that at the moment this method of irradiation is permitted in Denmark, Italy, France, the Netherlands, Belgium and Spain, that there is a proposal along those lines in the United Kingdom, that there is no ban in Greece, Portugal and Ireland and that there is a ban in Luxembourg and in the Federal Republic of Germany.
Jeg vil gerne gentage Kommissionens og især Sir Leon Brittans tak til udvalget for dets grundlige behandling af et teknisk, men vigtigt stykke lovgivning.
I shall propose that this list be cut, as I have just explained, but I cannot accept Amendments Nos 6, 7, 32, 33 and 36 which go farther than what the Commission considers feasible.
C3-39/89 — SYN 169) til direktiv om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om levnedsmidler og levnedsmiddelingredienser, som er behandlet med ioniserende stråling.
This change would also lead to confusion and so I cannot accept Amendments Nos 4, the first part of 18 and 35 in their present wording. Having said that, the Commission admits that its own proposal for a logo does not contain a clear message and should therefore be reviewed.
Formanden. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
That is the current situation in the Community.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok.
We think that this directive is a case in point.
A3-44/89) af Bru Purón for Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Ret tigheder om forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet (KOM/88/778 endel. — dok. C3-47/89 — SYN 176) til direktiv om investeringsservice i forbindelse med værdipapirer.
The Commission is fully aware of the important issues at stake and will exercise the powers it is claiming in this sphere with the greatest possible care.
Quistorp (V), ordfører. — (DE) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, der er her tale om et direktivforslag fra Kommissionen om behandling af levnedsmidler og levnedsmiddelingredienser med ioniserende stråling eller rettere sagt »bestråling af levnedsmidler«.
Ionization of food can replace chemical treatment, particularly with toxic gases where dangerous residues can be deposited in the food, for example for destroying germs or microorganisms which cause decay.
For det første vil jeg gerne takke Kommissionen for dette direktivforslag samt for de anstrengelser, den har udfoldet for at fastlægge ensartede EF-regler og for at imødekomme den usikkerhed, som forbrugerne har givet udtryk for over for sundhedsfarlige produkter.
The products on this list were mainly chosen in order to guarantee the health safety of these foods under optimal technical circumstances.
Men dernæst vil jeg tilslutte mig Miljøudvalgets traditionelle kritik, nemlig at dette kommissionsforslag samt direktivet er fuldkommen utidssvarende. varende.
It goes without saying that this process may not be used in order to repair cosmetically the effects of bad industrial production methods or slack hygiene standards.
Bru Purón (S), ordfører. — (ES) Hr. formand, jeg skal meddele, at ved en efterfølgende analyse af betænkningen om investeringsselskaber og værdipapirer efter dennes vedtagelse i udvalget har jeg i min egenskab af ordfører taget nogle punkter op til fornyet overvejelse, og da nogle af disse stadig er dunkle, finder jeg det efter at have rådført mig med repræsentanter for forskellige politiske grupper hen sigtsmæssigt at anmode om henvisning af betænkningen til fornyet udvalgsbehandling.
The Commission incidentally is also preparing a proposal for a directive to guarantee the level of safety necessary to enjoy consumer confidence.