natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vi har i forvejen fastlagt en uopsættelig debat i denne uge om mordet på hr. Falcone.
A topical and urgent debate on the murder of Judge Falcone is already planned for this week.
Derfor har jeg taget afstand fra at komme med en udtalelse om det2).
That is why I have made no statement on this matter. (:)
Forslaget til dagsorden for indeværende mødeperiode er omdelt.
Pursuant to Rule 105, the Socialist Group has requested postponement of the report by Mr Lo Giudice on behalf of the Committee on Budgetary Control (Doc.
I henhold til artiklerne 73 og 74 i forretningsordenen er der vedtaget eller foreslået følgende ændringer af den.
A3191/92) on budgetary management of the structural funds so that it can be taken in a joint debate with the report by Mr Brito.
Formanden. — Jeg skal meddele Dem, at hr. Kostopoulos med virkning fra i dag ikke længere er medlem af Den Socialistiske Gruppe.
PRESIDENT. — I hereby inform the House that with effect from today, Mr Kostopoulos is no longer a Member of the Socialist Group.
Den Socialistiske Gruppe anmoder i overensstemmelse med forretningsordenens artikel 105 om, at betænkning af Lo Giudice for Budgetkontroludvalget (A3-191/92) om strukturfondenes budget udsættes, så at den kan behandles sammen med Britobe tænkningen.
OOMEN-RUUTEN (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, I hereby wish to support the motion tabled by the Socialist Group to remove the Lo Guidice report from the agenda and deal with it in the next partsession, I then have a further point relating to the agenda for Monday. May I raise this now, Mr President, or must I wait till later?
Kostopoulos (NI). — (GR) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne have, at baggrunden kommer med i Europa-Parlamentets protokol, og vil derfor meddele, at min udelukkelse i et år fra PASOK og som følge heraf fra Den Socialistiske Gruppe har to årsager.
KOSTOPOULOS (NI). — (GR) Mr President just for the record and to ensure that it is noted in the verbatim report of proceedings of the European Parliament, I would like to inform you that I have been suspended from the PASOK — and by extension from the Socialist Group — for two reasons.
Den første er en tv-udsendelse, hvor to journalister interviewede mig i halvanden time, og hvor jeg sagde, at formanden for Den Socialistiske Gruppe, hr. Cot, efter min vurdering er placeret til højre i gruppen, på højrefløjen.
The first reason is that in a television programme, during which two journalists interrogated me for an hour and a half, I said that in my opinion, the chairman of the Socialist Group, Mr Cot, was right-wing with respect to the Group.
Oomen-Ruijten (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne støtte Den Socialistiske Gruppes anmodning om, at Lo Giudice-betænkningen tages af dagsordenen og behandles i næste mødeperiode.
LANE (RDE). — Mr President, I propose that we retain the Lo Giudice report on structural funding on the agenda. I think it is particularly relevant at the present time, when we are talking about reorganizing the struc tural funding and cohesion funding.
Jeg har herefter endnu et punkt til dagsordenen for mandag, hr. formand, kan jeg fremsætte dette nu eller om lidt?
I believe it would be of great benefit in the forthcoming discussions and debates both in Ireland and other Member States in relation to the Maastricht treaty and the treaty on union.
Den anden årsag til, at jeg er blevet frataget min funktion i gruppen, er, at jeg udtalte, at fr. Durys betænkning om Tyrkiet tillægger Tyrkiet større vægt i Balkan-området end mit land, Grækenland.
The second reason for my suspension, Mr President, is that I said that Mrs Dury's report on Turkey upgrades Turkey's role in the Balkans — making it equivalent in importance to that of my own country, Greece.
') Godkende/se af protokollen: se protokollen.
OOMEN-RUIJTEN (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, in principle I can agree to that.
2) Parlamentets sammensætning — Prøvelse af mandater — Sammensætning af delegationerne: se protokollen.
') Approval of Minutes: sec Minutes :) Membership of Parliament — Verification of Credentials — Membership of Parliamentary Delegations: see Minutes
3) Skriftlige erklæringer optaget i registeret (forretningsordenens artikel 65) — Bevillingsoverførsler — Udvalgshenvisninger (ændringer) — Modtagne dokumenter: se protokollen.
Petitions — Written declarations I Rale 65) — Transfer of appropriations — Referral to committee: changed referral — Documents received: see Minutes
Lane behandles i samme mødeperiode, hvad det så end bliver for en.
OOMEN-RUIJTEN there is no alternative to postponing it to tomorrow, then I will fall in line with that. It would be fine by me.
dene blive stående på dagsordenen. Jeg mener, at den er særlig relevant på indeværende tidspunkt, når vi snakker om at reorganisere strukturfondene og om samhørighedsfonden.
PRESIDENT. — If you are in agreement then that is settled. (')
Jeg mener, det ville være til stor gavn for de kommende diskussioner og drøftelser både i Irland og andre medlemsstater om Maastricht-Traktaten og Unionstraktaten.
Pursuant to Rule 105, the Rainbow Group in the European Parliament has requested postponement to July of the report by Mr De Gucht, on behalf of the Committee on Institutional Affairs, on a uniform electoral procedure.
Derfor vil jeg foreslå, at denne betænkning bliver stående på dagsordenen.
Just because there was a referendum in Denmark does not mean that we can avoid dealing with this issue.
(Anmodningen blev imødekommet)
(Applause) (Parliament rejected the request)
Oomen-Ruijten (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, på anmodning af vor gruppe ville vi forfærdelig gerne have tilføjet betænkningerne af Medina Ortega, Ortiz Climent og Suárez González, alle om De Kanariske Øer, på dagsordenen for i dag.
EWING (ARC). — Mr President, it is really in the interests of logic that I move that we do not take up the De Gucht report now that we have taken the Hänsch and De Giovanni reports off the agenda.
Formanden. — Fru kollega, vi har aftalt med alle gruppeformændene, at vi tager dette som første punkt på dagsordenen i morgen.
If you look at the content of these three reports, they all go logically together.
Er De indforstået med det?
I think it is absolutely absurd to leave De Gucht on.
De Gucht (PPE), ordfører. — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg tror, at plenarmødet har gjort ret i at henvise betænkningerne af Hänsch og De Giovanni til en senere mødeperiode, fordi de faktisk hænger meget nøje sammen med udvidelsen.
I know the Germans will not agree with this because they want to push this on.
Vi har allerede tidligere i Europa-Parlamentet udtalt os om dette problem, og jeg tror, at det ville være godt, hvis vi fremsætter vor endelige udtalelse.
I suggest, Mr President, that if we are going to be logical the three reports should be taken during the same partsession, whenever that may be.
En anden grund til, at jeg er imod fornyet udvalgsbehandling, er, at mine forslag vedrørende det ensartede valgsystem er tydelige.
PRESIDENT. — Pursuant to Rule 103, the Committee on Transport and Tourism has requested referral back to committee for the report by Mr Jarzembowski on agree ments and concerted practices in air transport (Doc.
Formanden. — Hvis De er indforstået med det, kan vi vedtage det ')·
(Parliament approved the request) (
Tirsdag:
Wednesday:
Bjørnvig (ARC). — Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne tale for, at man udskyder De Gucht-betænkningen.
DE GUCHT (PPE), rapporteur. — (NL) Mr President, I believe that the plenary session is right to postpone the Hänsch and Giovanni reports to a later partsession, because these reports are certainly very closely related.
Jeg synes ikke, at det vil være rimeligt at fortsætte med at stemme om en betænkning, som sætter spørgsmål ved den politiske balance imellem repræsentationen af de små og store medlemsstater i Europa-Parlamentet på et tidspunkt, hvor vi ikke endnu har haft lejlighed til at debattere resultatet af den danske folkeafstemning f.eks., og hvor vi skal have den store debat på onsdag.
On the other hand, in my opinion the plenary session would be wrong to refer my report back to the committee because it deals with a problem which the Maastricht Treaty expressly stated should be dealt with by the end of the year. We, the members of the European Parliament, have already issued one statement on this problem and I believe that it would be a good thing to issue a final statement now.
Jeg synes under alle omstændigheder, at det også på længere sigt ville være det mest fornuftige, at vi udsætter De Gucht-betænkningen, i hvert fald indtil juli og helst længere.
In the past we were right to keep these two subjects — the number of seats and the electoral system — apart and if the plenary session were to succeed in reaching a decision during this partsession, then we could also move on to the problem of the uniform electoral procedure.
Regnbuegruppen i Europa-Parlamentet anmoder i overensstemmelse med artikel 105 i forretningsordenen om, at De Guchtbetænkningen for Udvalget om Institutionelle Spørgsmål om Europa-Parlamen tets medlemstal udsættes til juli.
PRESIDENT. — Pursuant to Rule 103, the Green Group in the European Parliament has requested referral back to committee of the second report (Doc. A3-126/92) by Mr Rothley, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions, the final vote on which is scheduled for Wednesday.
Galland (LDR). — (FR) Hr. formand, vi går ind for at drøfte De Gucht betænkningen nu.
BJØRNVIG (ARC). — (DK) Mr President, I am very much in favour of postponing the De Gucht report.
Vi ved, at der er balanceproblemer i Europa-Parlamentet og mellem de forskellige nationaliteter.
In any case, I definitely believe that it would also be more sensible in the long term to postpone the De Gucht report until July or even later.
Problemerne af i dag eksisterer i morgen, om et halvt år, de vil være de samme.
LANNOYE (V). — (FR) Mr President, dear colleagues, we all know that a number of international agreements are currently being discussed in Rio de Janeiro.
Måske åbner der sig for os et perspektiv for, at en løsning kan vinde relativ konsensus.
These agreements concern problems linked to the environment, including the key issue of maintaining biodiversity.
I øvrigt ved vi, at Rådet har bedt om denne betænkning, og Rådets formand har desuden for nylig mindet om, at han venter på beslutningen fra Europa-Parlamentet, for at man kan drøfte sagen i Rådet.
Most of the Member States of the European Community will probably sign the agreement, which has been ready for signing since 5 June, but the United States and probably Great Britain are hostile towards it.
Det er ikke fornuftigt at forlange ekstra beføjelser og så ikke reagere på denne afventen.
We also know that there is a direct link between the problems of biodiversity and the patenting of living matter, a subject tackled by the Rothley report, and on which a vote should be taken on Wednesday.
Ewing (ARC). — (EN) Hr. formand, det er virkelig i logikkens interesse, at jeg foreslår, at vi ikke behandler De Gucht betænkningen nu, da vi har taget Hänsch- og De Giovanni betænkningerne af dagsordenen, for hvis man ser på indholdet i disse tre betænkninger, hænger de alle logisk sammen.
GALLAND (LDR). — (FR) Mr President, we are in favour of discussing the De Gucht report now.
Jeg mener, det er aldeles absurd at lade De Gucht betænkningen blive stående. Jeg ved, at tyskerne ikke vil være enige i det, for de ønsker at presse på med det.
We know that there are problems of balance both in the European Parliament and among the various nationalities.
Det forstår jeg, men jeg mener ikke, det er en grund til at være så ulogisk.
Today's problems will persist tomorrow and in six months from
Formandskabet har gjort en stor indsats for at prøve at bylte ens betænkninger sammen. Jeg vil mene, hr. formand, at hvis vi vil være logiske, bør de tre betænkninger
I feel — as does my group — that the debate devoted to the problems of patenting has barely taken into account
') For yderligere ændringer af mandagens dagsorden: se protokollen. kollen.
Further changes to Monday's agenda: see Minutes
Der er ingen årsags-virknings-forbindelse mellem disse to ting, og vi regner da med, at vore
Further changes to Tuesday's agenda: see Minutes
danske kolleger forbliver medlemmer af Fællesskabet og fortsat er repræsenteret her i salen.
LANNOYE their mouth is and thus enable the referral back so that we may make a fresh start.
(Bifald) (Anmodningen blev ikke imødekommet)
their impact on the problems of biodiversity.
Jeg vil derfor gerne henlede Deres opmærksom hed på, at i den konvention, der for øjeblikket ligger til underskrivelse, nævner en række artikler udtryk keligt denne patentproblematik.
However, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that, in the agreement which has currently been submitted for sign ing, a number of articles explicitly refer to the problems of patents.
Artikel 16, stk. 5, i konventionen siger nemlig, at de kontraherende par ter erkender, at patenter og andre intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder kan have indflydelse på konventionens gennemførelse, og at man skal sikre sig, at disse rettigheder ikke modarbejder konventionens mål.
Article 16 paragraph 5 of the agreement states that the contracting parties acknowledge that patents and other intellectual property rights can influence the implementation of the agreement and must assure themselves that these rights do not run counter to the objectives of the agreement.
Formanden. — Udvalget om Transport og Turisme anmoder i overensstemmelse med artikel 103 i for retningsordenen om, at betænkning af Jarzembowski om visse kategorier af aftaler inden for luftfartssektoren (dok.
Once again, I would like to emphasize the following — and this is also the position adopted by the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development: We are most definitely in favour of a legal system being created within the European Community.
A3-140/92), som der i overensstemmelse med artikel 40, stk. 2, i forretningsordenen skulle stemmes om tirsdag kl. 12, tilbagevises til udvalget. get.
However, we believe that the interests of Third World countries must be taken into account and that we must consider whether or not the patent law with respect to life forms constitutes the right kind of framework at all.
Anmodningen begrundes med, at Udvalget om Transport og Turisme dermed får mulighed for på grundlag af et nyt arbejdsdokument at gå ind i en dybtgående diskussion med Kommissionen.
The first is that the argument invoked, namely the absence of links with the agreement, lacks substance since there is no contradiction between what is in the report and what is in the agreement.
Eftersom der i vore drøftelser i meget ringe grad har været tale om denne konvention — og med rette, eftersom den nævnte konvention først i nogle dage har ligget til underskrift — mener vi, at det ville være letfærdigt af Parlamentet uden forudgående debat om de eventuelle konsekvenser af patent på levende ting under iagttagelse af den konvention, der vil blive underskrevet af flertallet af Fællesskabets medlemsstater, at gå til afstemning.
Insofar as little reference has been made to this agree ment in our debates — and for good reason — since the said agreement was submitted for signature only a few days ago we feel that it would be thoughtless of Parliament to take a vote, without prior debate, on any consequences arising from the patenting of living matter or on the observance of this agreement which is to be signed by most of the Member States of the Community.
Derfor anmoder vi om, at den tilbagevises til udvalget, for at vi kan se på denne problematik.
This is why we are asking for a referral back to committee in order to examine these problems.
Jarzembowski (PPE), ordfører. — (DE) Hr. for mand, jeg tror ikke, dette kræver nogen nærmere begrundelse.
Secondly, we must take a decision before a certain deadline and if we let it pass the Parliament will no longer have a say.
(Anmodningen blev imødekommet) ·)
Consequently, I see no reason to accede to this request.
A3-126/92), der skulle have været til endelig afstemning på onsdag.
(Parliament rejected the request)
Graefe zu Baringdorf (V). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne støtte min gruppeformands anmodning.
GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF (V). — (DE) — Mr President, I wish to support the motion tabled by the chairman of my group.
De ved, at der tit har været diskussioner om denne betænkning.
As you know, this report has been the subject of much discussion.
De vil erindre, at hr. Rothley i sin tid inden afstemningen om den lovgivningsmæssige beslutning forlangte tilbagevisning til udvalget, fordi Kommissionen ikke havde tilsluttet sig ændringsforslagene — hovedsagelig tre af dem.
You will recall that Mr Rothley requested referral back to the committee even before the vote on the legislative resolution, because the Commission had not adopted the amendments, or, more precisely, because it had not adopted three of them.
Det drejede sig dengang om, at der mellem Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter, Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder og Energi, Forsknings- og Teknologiudvalget skulle nedsættes en arbejdsgruppe, der skulle give Parlamentet oplysninger om direktivets virkninger.
The issue at stake at the time was the proposed establishment of a working party by the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights and the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology with a view to inform ing the Parliament of the consequences of the directive.
Der er nu truffet en aftale mellem ordføreren og kommissær Bangemann.
The rapporteur has now made an agreement with Commissioner Bangemann.
Det kom til et kompromis om disse tre ændringsforslag, og det foreligger nu for os.
The compromise which was reached with respect to the three amendments is now available.
I denne arbejdsgruppe var, hvis jeg vurderer det rigtigt, flertallet af den opfattelse, at Kommissionens indrømmelser ikke var tilstrækkelige til, at man nu kunne gøre denne betænkning færdig, så meget mere som der, hvis det sker nu, ved andenbehandlingen overhovedet ikke er flere muligheder for fra Parlamentets side at reagere på de nye udviklinger, som Paul Lannoye netop har nævnt.
If I am not mistaken, the majority of members of the working party adopted the view that the concessions made by the Commission were insufficient to justify adopting this report now unless it should prove to be the case that there was no other way in which Parliament could react to the new developments as outlined just now by Paul Lannoye.
Lannoye (V). — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, vi ved alle, at man i øjeblikket i Rio diskuterer en række internationale konventioner om miljøproblematikken, heriblandt den specielt vigtige der drejer sig om bevarelse af arternes mangfoldighed.
PRESIDENT. — Mrs Oomen-Ruijten, you have pro posed setting 12 noon on Tuesday as the deadline for tabling amendments, but that would mean that we could not take the vote at 5 p.m. as planned, but only on Thursday.
Største parten af Det Europæiske Fællesskabs medlemsstater vil formentlig underskrive denne konvention, der har været åben for underskrivelse siden den 5. juni, men vi ved, at De Forenede Stater og formentlig Storbritannien er negativt indstillet.
COT (S). — (FR) Mr President, this is a situation we have faced many times with respect to major political debates: should we — with a view to achieving perfection in the text of the resolution — wait until Thursday evening to reach a decision, or, bearing in mind the anticipated response to our proposal, should we take a decision in the heat of the debate? That is the choice.
Vi ved også, at der er en direkte forbindelse mellem dette spørgsmål om arternes mangfoldighed og patent på levende
During the debate on Maastricht in April, we decided that the importance of the debate demanded that a position be adopted immediately and to ensure that the debate was immediately followed by the adoption of a position.
') For yderligere andringer af tirsdagens dagsorden: se protokollen. kollen.
Our group, the Green Group in the European Parliament, which has not held back in making its presence felt with regard to this issue, was frequently approached in private by many people, including numerous representatives of the Socialist Group, who said: 'In principle you are right to have your objections. Let's be careful!'
Vi har derfor i arbejdsgruppen foreslået, at betænkningen tilbagevises til udvalget.
In this way, the general public would receive this message by Wednesday evening. I can understand
Vi er ganske vist klar over, at hvis betænkningen nu tilbagevises til udvalget, skal der laves en ny betænkning, fordi
I therefore request all those who share our doubts as to whether we are yet capable of voting on a directive with such far-reaching consequences to put their vote where
Graefe zu Baringdorf fristen så vil være udløbet, men alligevel vil vi gerne bede Parlamentet om at stemme for tilbagevisningen, for at arbejdsgruppen kan drøfte virkningerne af patentdirektivet og derefter give Parlamentet meddelelse om det.
debate on Denmark, for which four hours have currently been reserved. If we could make this slight adjustment, the groups would have the opportunity to express their opinions on the Delors II package without seriously prejudicing our debate on the Danish affair.
Formanden. — Fru kollega, De har stillet forslag om at udsætte fristen for at stille ændringsforslag til tirsdag kl. 12.00, men det vil betyde, at vi ikke som påregnet kan stemme kl. 17.00, men først om torsdagen. dagen.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Cot, your Group can decide that itself, since we allocate speaking time for the whole day and each group is free to decide what it does with this time. (2)
Cot (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, vi er igen her i en situation, som vi har kendt flere gange forud for en stor politisk debat: Skal vi af hensyn til beslutningstekstens perfekthed vente til torsdag aften med at træffe beslutning, eller skal vi under hensyn til det ekko, vi agter at give vort forslag, udtale os umiddelbart efter debatten? Det er alternativet.
OOMEN­RUUTEN (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, I would like to raise this issue once more.
Vor gruppe, De Grønne i Europa-Parlamentet, der har gjort sig stærkt gældende i dette spørgsmål, har hele tiden fået henvendelser bag kulisserne fra mange, også fra mange repræsentanter for Den Socialistiske Gruppe.
Therefore, Mr President, I would like to ask Mr Cot the following question: What is now more important for the outside world — the vote on a resolu­tion or, as befits a Parliament, the word which gives a definite answer?
Her sagde man: »I grunden har I ret med jeres betænkeligheder.
I would therefore like to stand by the proposal which I just tabled.
Lad os være forsigtige!« Men det giver sig åbenbart ikke udslag i afstemningerne.
(Parliament rejected the request) (')
Jeg beder derfor alle, der ligesom os tvivler på, om vi allerede nu kan stemme om et så vidtrækkende direktiv, om at stemme sammen med os og gøre en tilbagevisning mulig, for at vi kan gøre en ny begyndelse.
DAVID (S). — Mr President, I would like to ask you if it would be in order to ask for a Commission statement on Friday morning on the future of the PERIFRA pro­gramme.
Jeg vil endnu en gang gerne understrege — og det er også holdningen i Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter: Vi går afgjort ind for, at det kommer til en retlig ordning i Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
PRESIDENT. — The chairman of the Committee on Culture, Youth, Education and the Media has withdrawn the Fayot/Schinzel report on the role of the Media (Doc. A3­153/92) for technical reasons.
Men vi er af den opfattelse, at Den Tredje Verdens landes behov skal tilgodeses, og at vi skal overveje, om patentret for levende ting overhovedet er den rigtige ramme.
PRESIDENT. — Mr David, I note your request, but I must point out that it should have been tabled at least an hour before the sitting opened.
Jeg forstår fru Oomen-Ruit-jens og en række af hendes kollegers betænkeligheder, men jeg beder dem betænke, at her er det bedre det godes fjende.
This report has therefore been taken off the agenda.
Herman (PPE). — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg er imod denne betænkning af tre grunde.
(The agenda was thus established) (■')