natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C3-204/90 — SYN 179) med henblik på vedtagelse af Rådets direktiv om ændring, navnlig med hensyn til ansvarsforsikring for motorkøretøjer, af direktiv 73/239/EØF og direktiv 88/357/EØF, som begge angår samordning af love og administrative bestemmelser vedrørende direkte forsikringsvirksomhed bortset fra livsforsikring (Ordfører: Rothley).
The Commission is fully aware of its responsibilities where the use of animals and the limitation of their suffering is concerned, in accordance with Directive 86/609 on the protection of animals used for experimental purposes or other scientific ends.
Derfor vil jeg anmode Kommissionen om at over veje det hele endnu en gang. Jeg mener, at Paria-
With this in view it will work actively to encourage the development of alternative experimental methods.
Rothley mentet bliver nødt til at forkaste den fælles holdning af de nævnte grunde.
RIPA DI MEANA discover and produce independently the same chemical substance is in reality very limited.
Derfor anmoder jeg om, at Kommissionen gennem Dem, hr. formand, en gang for alle svarer på mit — mange gange tidligere stillede — spørgsmål om, hvorfor den tilsigter at skabe kon kurrence mellem juridiske ordninger og ikke mellem Fællesskabets virksomheder.
To Mr Cámara Martinez, who asked what the Commission was doing in regard to existing substances, I should like to say in reply that, in July, the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation on a systematic appraisal of existing substances, which was transmitted to Parliament.
García Amigo (PPE). — (ES) Hr. formand, på Det Europæiske Folkepartis Gruppes vegne tilslutter jeg mig alt, hvad ordføreren, hr. Rothley, sagde.
OOMEN-RUIJTEN (PPE), rapporteur. — (NL) Mr President, I am of course prepared to let the Com missioner have the study he has asked for, the research carried out in the Netherlands by SWOKA, and I hope that this will have some effect on Europe.
Delvis ud fra samme argumenter som ordføreren og delvis ud fra andre.
I would just lay down one condition, namely that before the second reading he has another good look at all the amendments he is now rejecting.
Hr. formand, jeg ville gerne have en redegørelse fra Kommissionen for følgende tre spørgsmål:
PRESIDENT. — The debate is closed.
Endelig det tredje punkt, kernen i problemet: Kan Kommissionen en gang for alle forklare, hvad den forstår ved masserisiko?
Coming now to the other amendments, the Commission cannot accept amendments Nos 3,4, 7, 9,10, 12, 13,14, 16,17, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 31, 32, 33, second part and 41.
Hr. formand, en eller anden har sagt, at et parlament — i dette tilfælde Rådet, eftersom det er den lovgivende myndighed — kan alt, bortset fra et gøre en mand til en kvinde.
2 and 3 of Article 11, so as to clarify the procedures and take account of Parliament's suggestions.
Med en let omskrivning af dette udsagn kan man sige, at Kommissionen og Rådet kan alt, bortset fra at gøre en masserisiko til en individuel eller industriel risiko.
Whilst not agreeing entirely with what is proposed in amendments Nos 28 and 29, the Commission proposes to reexamine the wording of these paragraphs, taking into account Parliament's com ments.
På baggrund af ovennævnte og de af hr. Rothley fremsatte argumenter tilslutter jeg mig på Det Euro pæiske Folkepartis Gruppes vegne den fremsatte anmodning i håb om, at en minimal samordning vil resultere i forslag til direktiv om brugerbeskyttelse — via direktivet om urimelige kontraktvilkår og ansvarsforsikring — som allerede ligger til behandling i Retsudvalget.
With regard to amendments Nos 35 and 36, the Commission could put in hand the work of determining the content and format of these safety data sheets which, in the form of an appendix to the Directive itself or as a decisional directive from the Commission, will in any case be carried out using the committee procedure laid down in Article 26.
Men der mangler stadig — og jeg tillader mig at anmode Kommissionen om at fastsætte en frist — den annoncerede harmonisering af lovgivningen vedrørende forsikringspolicen, som muliggør den harmonisering, der er basis for fair konkurrence mellem Fællesskabets virksomheder, alle Fællesskabets virksomheder, med henblik på at øge konkurrencen, der afgjort vil blive til fordel for Fællesskabets forbrugere og brugere.
However, the first part of amendment No 36, which allows Member States to ask for a safety data sheet for all substances, is contrary to the aim of a single market, and we therefore cannot accept it.
Hvad i alverden er det for en forklaring?
the recommendation for the second reading (Doc.
Hvem kan forstå den? Hvornår får vi — spørger jeg hermed Kommissionen gennem Dem, hr. formand — en kodificering af forsikringssystemet?
A3-224/90) from the Committee on Social Affairs, Employment and the Working Environment on the common position of the Council (Doc.
I det mindste må de forskel lige nugældende og planlagte direktiver være præget af et mindstemål af klarhed og give dem, der skal opfylde disse bestemmelser en minimal sikkerhed.
C3-142/90 — SYN 129) with a view to the adoption of a directive on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work (Rapporteur: Mr Pronk) ;
F.eks. det engelske system, der ikke har nogen lovgivning omkring forsikringskontrakter, over for andre ord ninger, f.eks. den tyske og spanske, der har en alt for stiv — eller i hvert fald meget stiv — regulering af
Amendment No 39 which, under Annex 3B, is designed to introduce into the technical dossier an additional pre-screening test for teratogenicity for substances marketed in quantities under 1 tonne, represents in the Commission's view an unjustified burden on industry, and is therefore rejected.
Price (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, det var her i Parlamentet, at den proces begyndte, som førte til det lovgivningsprogram, der skulle skabe det fælles indre marked inden udgangen af 1992.
— the report (Doc. A3-218/90) by Lord O'Hagan on behalf of the Committee on Social Affairs, Employ ment and the Working Environment on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(90) 184 final —Doc.
Derfor er det vigtigt, at vi hjælper med til at fremme lovgivningsprocessen, så det indre marked kan blive virkelig gjort.
C3-187/90 —SYN 256) for a directive amending Directive 83/477/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work;
Når det gælder finansielle tjenesteydelser har vi ikke fulgt vore dristige ord op med den nødvendige handling, og det gør vi stadig ikke, og jeg er bange for, at de ændringsforslag, der stilles i denne betænkning, viser dette.
I should like briefly to refer to a problem raised by Mr Valverde y Lopez, who asked the Commission to give fuller reasons to enable Parliament to make a more detailed assessment of the subject.
Skadelidt ved færdselsuheld sikres igen nem et helt andet direktiv, som Parlamentet har vedtaget, og som er blevet vedtaget af Rådet.
I would point out that our proposal is accompanied by an extremely full explanation — one that is very much wider and deeper than is customary.
Så deres forhold er ordnet og har ikke noget at gøre med de forslag, vi nu har fået forelagt.
I therefore accept the honourable Member's exhortation in principle, but in this case I do not think that it applies.
Price ændringsforslag på nogen måde vil hjælpe os til at tage dette skridt.
PRESIDENT exposed to ionizing radiation during their activities in installations in which such radiation is used.
Det nytter ikke meget at have fælles forsikringssystemer... ringssystemer...
We feel that in this case, which is perhaps exceptional, this is an aspect which deserves special consideration.
Sir Leon Brittan, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, idet jeg først kommenterer det sidste, der blev sagt, så vil jeg gerne se på sagen, og jeg er det ærede medlem taknemmelig for at have rejst spørgsmålet.
PRONK (PPE), rapporteur. — (NL) Mr President, I am glad the number of Members in the Chamber is still greater than the number of interpreters.
Som jeg har sagt, er sikringen af de skadelidte blevet behandlet i anden forbindelse.
We are after all dealing here with an exceptionally important subject which lies at the heart of Parliament's concerns.
Dette her drejer sig simpelt hen om konkurrencen mellem forsikringsselskaberne om at sælge forsikringer.
Our powers are relatively few, but as regards the health and safety of workers at the workplace we do have some real powers, going beyond those of even a major individual Member State.
Vor hensigt med forslaget om motorkøretøjer er ikke at begynde på noget nyt, men at bringe forsikring af motorkøretøjer ind under det andet ramme direktiv, som vi påtog os at gøre i 1988, og derfor er det meget relevant, hvad hr. Lane lige har sagt.
O'HAGAN, The Lord, rapporteur. — Mr President, I should like to endorse the words of Mr Pronk. This Parliament discusses many dramatic and exciting topics, but it is in the detail of the work that we do on behalf of the citizens of the Community that we can perhaps make our most notable contribution.
Det er vigtigt at understrege, at dette forslag og det andet forslag om livsforsikring, som jeg forstår vi skal drøfte under næste mødeperiode, kun vil udgøre afslutningen på et mellemstadium i vort arbejde hen imod oprettelse af et fælles marked for forsikringer i hele Fællesskabet, et mål, som alle medlemsstaterne og Parlamentet tilsluttede sig, da Kommissionens hvidbog om gennemførelsen af det indre marked blev vedtaget i 1985.
The proposals that he and I are discussing this evening, and which we hope the House will endorse later on, are amongst these narrow but important topics.
Lane (RDE). — (EN) Hr. formand, i sidste instans har vi som medlemmer af Parlamentet pligt til at sikre, at Europas borgere har adgang til forsikring til realistiske priser i alle medlemsstater.
The protection of workers at the workplace is a subject that is always worthy of our interest and attention, since it is extremely important for people not to be exposed to unnecessary degrees of risk in the course of their work.
Efter at have afgivet vor udtalelse i Parlamentet i februar ser vi nu, at Rådet har valgt at ignorere nogle af vore ændringsforslag.
It is certainly a matter of some importance in a common market that different workers in different countries are not played off against each other.
Vi ser også, at Kommissionen nu forbereder nye forslag, der faktisk kan erstatte noget af vort nuværende arbejde.
That is why our work in this field, though unspectacular, remains very important.
Det er derfor af afgørende betydning at få de resterende forslag om mellemstadiet af vejen så hurtigt som muligt, så at vi kan koncentrere os om den sidste og afgørende fase af vort arbejde.
With such technical reports, there is also sometimes a certain amount of criticism of the number of amendments tabled by the Social Affairs Committee: there are in fact more than forty.
Jeg vil blot fremsætte nogle få kommentarer til betænkningen inden for den tid, jeg har til rådighed. De juridiske systemer er forskellige i de forskellige medlemsstater, og det er derfor vanskeligt at få en fælles holdning.
The topic of asbestos is not one that catches the headlines every day, but over the years scientific advance has shown that its use can be a serious danger both to the workers and to the citizen at large, and the small but noticeable advance recommended by the Commission in this field is something we in Parliament and the wider public should respect and admire.
Eftersom ikke-obligatorisk bilforsikring allerede er behandlet i det generelle direktiv, er det fra et praktisk synspunkt af afgørende betydning, at man vælger de samme eller lignende løsninger for lovpligtig og frivillig motorkøretøjsforsikring, der næsten altid står på samme police.
I think the Commission struck a reasonable balance in the first instance and all I would like to say today, apart from encouraging the Commission and those Members who are present here tonight to push ahead with this proposal, is that it was a pity that the speed of business in the Committee on Social Affairs, Employment and the Working Environment gave us so little time to consider in detail what is being proposed.
Hvis der blev anvendt to forskellige systemer til forskellige former for forsikringsdækning, der normalt anføres på samme formular, så ville det skabe store vanskeligheder for forsikringsvirksomhederne både fra den enkelte medlems stat og fra andre lande.
I make no complaint about the chairmanship or the secretariat of the committee or about the way the Commission has behaved, but on these very detailed and technical matters, it is important that the committee be given appropriate time to examine alternative proposals so that we adopt sensible amendments and add something to the working lives and the general amenities of the citizens of our Community.
Derfor har jeg alvorlige forbehold over for ændringsforslag nr. 1 og 2 og er ikke helt uenig med Rådet.
We shall be voting on the amendments at this stage of this legislative proposal tomorrow, and I hope we will give it good speed and make sure that we contribute to the work that is before us.
Endelig har jeg et problem, som jeg gerne vil bede kommissæren om at se på: Forsikring af motorkøretøjer udstedt i én medlemsstat giver dækning i alle medlemsstater.
Secondly, one of the difficulties we have to face is actually a constitutional problem, namely the course adopted by the Council. The Commission initially made a proposal.
Når en borger fra én stat flytter til en anden stat og flytter sin forsikrede bil med sig, så accepteres forsikringsdækningen fuldt ud, undtagen i Irland, hvor de lokale myndigheder nægter at anerkende denne dækning, når køretøjet skal betale
That proposal was modified in the light of Parliament's first reading, then substantially reworked — and to some extent, I have to say, improved — in the common position of the Council.
Kommissionen har altid erkendt, at ansvarsforsikring for motorkøretøjer er noget særligt, for så vidt som beskyttelsen af de interesser, de skadelidte ved trafikulykker har, er af altoverskyggende betydning.
The whole committee goes along with the Council on this, but on the other hand there is the major problem that the Council has introduced so many changes, not just of substance, but also of form, that it has become extremely difficult to keep to the constitutional procedure.
Det er for eksempel derfor, vi har insisteret på, at den dækning, der skal ydes af forsikringer, som tilbydes i kraft af fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser, skal være identisk med, hvad det kræves af lokale forsikringsvirksomheder, at de skal tilbyde.
This means that there is a great deal of uncertainty as regards which amendments are admissible or inadmissible in second reading, since in principle only those amendments adopted in first reading are admissible.
Det er derfor, der ikke bliver noget frit valg af, hvilken lovgivning der skal gælde.
If the Council is going to introduce largescale changes, however, then various people will want to bring out their own hobbyhorses once again.
Det er derfor, medlems staterne kan pålægge krav om forudgående godkendelse af policens bestemmelser, og det er derfor, vi har lavet bestemmelser om en lokal repræsentant.
This is a serious problem. I really would like the Council to give the matter its attention, so as to avoid this situation as far as possible in future, since we are then faced with the problems caused by these large numbers of amendments.
Men vi har aldrig accepteret, at ansvarsforsikring for motorkøretøjer er speciel i den forstand, at denne forsikringskategori skulle udelukkes fra det område, der dækkes af det andet direktiv om forsikringsvirksomhed bortset fra livsforsikring, og at begrebet store risici ikke skulle være anvendeligt.
workers if they had a total" exposure of 100 msv before the conception of the child, or 10 msv in the crucial six months before conception.
Derfor og på den måde, som hr. Price har forklaret, behandler vi spørgsmålet om ofrene separat.
And yet I remind you that the basic safeguards directive allows up to 50 msv per year.
skaber træder i kraft.
It is a very welcome proposal in the form that the Commission has presented it.
Det giver et værtsland kontrol med dækningen af disse reserver med ækvivalente aktiver indtil meddelelsen af rammedirektivet.
In fact, in some respects, it is a direct response to the plea that we made, as a Parliament, in our resolution of July 1988, following our committee of inquiry into the handling and transportation of nuclear waste.
Jeg kan ikke acceptere, at det skulle være logisk nødvendigt at forhale den fuldstændige indførelse af en ordning for store risici på denne måde.
For example, in paragraph 8 of the Annex, employers are invited to recommend a level to which workers going to work in nuclear installations can be exposed to.
Men jeg tror, at det kompromis, vi har accepteret, må imødekomme den bekymring, der er kommet til udtryk her i Parlamentet, og som i særdeleshed ligger bag ændringsforslag nr. 7.
That might in fact serve to legitimize exposure up to that level rather than concerning upon minimizing exposure and optimizing protection. Amendments are therefore included to try to cover that point.
Jeg er enig i, at denne skelnen er besværlig, og jeg håber derfor, vi hurtigt kan nå til enighed om det tredje direktiv, hvorefter skellet vil være irrelevant.
In fact, the basic safeguards in the directive from 1980 does not make any distinction between different types of worker in terms of the protection guarantee.
Men sådan som det forholder sig i øjeblikket med Fællesskabets retsakter og i lyset af Domstolens kendelse fra 1988, er vi i øjeblikket tvunget til at foretage denne skelnen.
But the Commission had found in practice that in terms of dosimetric monitoring and in terms of recording systems, there were deficiencies that meant that temporary and outside workers were being adversely effected or were open to increased risks.
Der er ikke nogen logisk grund til at skelne mellem ansvar, når det gælder motorkøretøjer, og almindeligt produktansvar. svar.
The fact that this directive is covered by the framework proposal and therefore contains farreaching aspects dealing with training, retraining and information for workers is also extremely useful.
Jeg gik ind på at overveje spørgsmålet. Kommissionen har medtaget en sådan bestemmelse i sit ændrede forslag.
My final concern in relation to the proposal concerns the need to build in some form of employment protection.
Af hensyn til kohærensen inden for sektoren for finansielle tjenesteydelser, svarer bestemmelsen stort set til den, der blev enighed om at indsætte i det andet bankdirektiv og som er foreslået til det andet direktiv om livsforsikring.
One of the problems is that workers very often can move between a series of nuclear installations, across national boundaries in a given time period and can be exposed to fairly high levels of radiation.
Derfor er det foreliggende forslag, skønt dets omfang er begrænset, helt i overensstemmelse med det, der tidligere er blevet gjort, og det som er foreslået for fremtiden.
Now if a worker reaches a particular level of exposure there is a possibility that worker could be penalized by being laid off by his employer.
Dette er af afgørende betydning, hvis der skal ske fremskridt hen imod det indre marked, der er base ret på princippet om fuldstændig harmonisering.
I therefore think that there is a need to build in a safeguard against that.
Hvis vi havde holdt fast ved princippet om fuldstændig harmonisering inden for Fællesskabet, ville vi aldrig nogen sinde have kunnet gøre fremskridt hen imod gennemførelsen af det indre marked.
I have suggested that workers reaching a particular exposure limit should be redeployed to other work without loss of status or pay.
Det skridt, der har ført til de fremskridt, vi har gjort, har været en generel indførelse af idéen om gensidig anerkendelse i stedet for idéen med harmonisering.
That could also act as a spur to employers actually to draw up a plan of work which would minimize exposure in the first place, which could be quite useful.
For det andet vil skadelidte af de grunde, jeg lige har nævnt, få fuld dækning. Og for det tredje, for så vidt man er bekymret for, at en forsikringsvirksomhed, der tilbyder tjenesteydelser til klienter inden for området store risici, skulle betale langsommere eller med større modvilje end en lokal etableret forsikringsvirksomhed, er Kommissionen gået med til at indføre den fulde ordning med store risici gradvis.
Mr President, moving on from the issue of the report that I have dealt with in committee — the outsideworker proposal — my group has also given me time to speak briefly on the other two reports we are debating, that on biological agents and Lord O'Hagan's report on assestos.
Vi kan derfor ikke acceptere ændringsforslag nr. 15 og ændringsforslag nr. 8.
I shall spend just a couple of minutes on each of those.
De er medtaget i dette forslag.
The first concerns exposure limits.
Jeg tror ikke, at de indvendinger, der er blevet rejst mod forslaget, som det er, kan stå for en nærmere prøvelse.
I know that the Commission intends, in fact, to move the exposure limits included in the basic safeguards directive downward once the International Commission on Radiological Protection make their recommendations in the near future.
Jeg har faktisk fået at vide, at udvalget aldrig har drøftet spørgsmålet om forkastelse, men at man kun blev enige om at støtte disse ændringsforslag.
The exposure limits in that directive, and therefore applying in this proposal, are too high.
Derfor er der set fra Kommissionens synspunkt ikke nogen basis for et forslag om at forkaste direktivet, medmindre jeg er galt underrettet.
Mr Pronk has already described the problems that he had as rapporteur in wrestling with the common position that has eventually arrived in Parliament after more than one year following the completion of Parliament's firstreading stage, dealth with by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection.
Jeg vil derfor opfordre Parlamentet til at støtte direktivet, sådan som jeg har forsvaret det og argumenteret for det her til aften.
Given the problems that Mr Pronk has had to overcome, he is to be congratulated on the way in which he has handled a very complex and difficult subject.
Hvad angår ændringsforslag nr. 6, vil Kommissionen foretrække at bevare den nuværende tekst.
Article 8 of the basic safeguard directive allows a whole body exposure limit of 50 msv per year.
På den ene side svarer metoden til beregning af bidrag til nationale garantiordninger til den nuværende praksis i medlemsstaterne.
The work of Professor Gardner and others at Sellafield, the nuclear installation in the northwest of England has shown, for example, that far lower levels of exposure can lead to problems, severe repercussions.
På den anden er der i artikel 9 allerede bestemmelser om tilvejebringelse af tilstrækkelige informationer.
They found there, in their study, that there was an association between the level of exposure of fathers to ionizing radiation at work and the increased incidence of leukaemia and lymphoma among their children.
Ændringsforslag nr. 6 vil derfor let blive et skridt i den forkerte retning snarere end en forbedring.
They found, in fact, that there is a six-fold increase in the possibility of leukaemia and lymphoma resulting in the children of radiological
Vi har accepteret en ny artikel 11, der giver bestemmelser om kontrol med beregning af tekniske reserver fra værtslandets side, indtil direktivet om regn-
There are a number of amendments which have come through from the Committee on Social Affairs, Employment and the Working Environment and we in the Socialist Group look to all sections of the House to
Transit af elektricitet gennem de overordnede net ter har vakt megen mistro hos de store distributionsselskaber.
In conclusion, I would like to mention one other amendment, namely Amendment No 4 tabled by Lord O'Hagan himself.
Trods den påpasselighed, Kommissionen har udvist, ser nogle i det foreliggende direktiv et først skridt mod common carrier.
It is a useful amendment that deals with demolition and the licencing of demolition companies.