natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
De fleste landmænd er imod at behandle deres dyr dårligt, men de tvinges ofte af de nævnte grunde til at etablere intensive produktionssystemer, der har meget lidt med kravene til dyrs velfærd at gøre, og som i øvrigt heller ikke levner megen mulighed for, at landmanden kan have det rart under pasningen af sine dyr. Det er i modstrid med en sos adfærdsmønster at stå bundet, så den f.eks. ikke kan rode halm sammen, når den skal fare.
Most farmers are loathe to treat their animals badly, but they are often compelled, for the reasons mentioned earlier, to establish intensive farming systems that have very little to do with the desiderata of animal welfare nor, for that matter, afford the farmer much chance of enjoying his work as he engages in animal husbandry, It runs counter to a sow's natural behaviour to be tethered so that it cannot, for example, root together hay when about to farrow.
I et moderne produktionssystem med spaltegulve er der desuden ingen halm eller strøelse, og forlanger man det indført i disse systemer, bryder systemet til fjernelse af gødningen sammen.
Nor indeed is there any hay or litter with the slatted floor of modern farming systems, and if there is a wish to introduce it into this system, then the dung-removal system breaks down.
Det er derfor godt, at man i betænkningen skelner mellem eksisterende og fremtidige systemer.
It is therefore a good thing that a distinction is made in the report between existing and future systems.
(Parlamentet vedtog forslag til lovgivningsmæssig beslutning)
(Parliament adopted the legislative resolution)
Det må være muligt, at de landmænd, der har investeret i overensstemmelse med gældende lovgivning og råd fra de landbrugskonsulenter, som de betaler til gennem deres foreninger, får en rimelig frist til at ændre produktionssystemerne.
Farmers who have invested in accordance with cutrent legislation and information from agricultural advisers, whom they pay through their associations, must be given a reasonable period of grace for changing their production systems.
Det vil sige, at man får afskrivningsperioden på 45 år plus de 45 år, systemet derudover er beregnet til at kunne holde, dvs. 10 år til at afvikle eksisterende systemer.
That means farmers would get a writing-off period of 45 years plus the 45 years that the system is further calculated to last, so 10 years to wind down existing systems.
Nye systemer bør derimod tilgodese dyrenes velfærd fra begyndelsen, også angående mulighed for motion.
New systems, on the othet hand, should provide for the animals' welfare from the start, also as regards freedom to move.
Denne mulighed bør dog være der hele tiden, bl.a. fordi det i praksis vil være umuligt for de få mennesker, man på grund af den stramme økonomi kan have til at passe svinene, at løsne dem og få dem bundet igen.
But that freedom must be constant, partly because it will in practice be impossible for the few people available, under the tight
II. forordning om fastsættelse af mindstekrav med hensyn til beskyttelse af svin i intensive produktionssystemer (KOM(89) 114 og 115 endel. — dok. C370/89 og C3-71/89)
A3-53/90) by Mr Simmonds, on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, on the proposals from the Commission to the Council for
(Formanden afbrød taleren) levende væsner i naturen og menneskets nyttige ledsagere på jorden — men ud fra deres økonomiske værdi, først og fremmest ud fra økonomiske og utilitaristiske motiver.
The first is that the welfare of animals is considered in the proposals in question, not because animals are Nature's living creatures and mankind's helpful companions on earth, but for their economic value; primarily for economic and utilitarian reasons.
For det andet lyder det grusomt falsk, og det synes at være toppen af ironi, at vi i EF bekymrer os så meget om dyrs velfærd, når vi erfarer — som det var tilfælde for nogle dage siden under oprøret i Strage-waies-fængslet i Det Forenede Kongerige — at der i samme EF er anbragt 1640 indsatte på den plads, der er afsat til 970, at man lukker 3 og 4 indsatte i 23 timer i celler, der hverken har opvarmning eller sanitære installationer og hvor et bad er den ugentlige luksus; eller som jeg selv havde lejlighed til at konstatere under et langt og opmærksomt besøg i Lissabons fængselskompleks, hvor de celler, der er bygget til 8 indsatte, var overfyldte med 20: Det vil sige mindre plads pr. mand, end vi nu kræver for svin og kalve.
The second is that it sounds tragically wrong and seems a glaring irony to concern ourselves in the European Community to such an extent with the welfare of animals when, in the same Community, as we heard some days ago with the riot in Strangeways prison in the United Kingdom, space for 970 prisoners is occupied by 1640, when three and four prisoners are kept for 23 hours in cells without sanitary installations and when a bath is a weekly luxury, or, as I was able to see on 6 March last in a long and attentive visit to the Judicial Police prison district in Lisbon, cells built for eight prisoners are crowding in 20; thus with less space per head than we are now demanding for pigs and calves ...
Pollack (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, publikum nærer i stigende grad afsky mod de grusomme metoder, der benyttes ved fremstilling af fødevarer.
POLLACK (S). — Mr President, there is a growing revulsion on the part of the public about the cruel practices to which we resort in order to produce our food.
Der kræves med rette indførelse af mere humane metoder.
People are rightly demanding the introduction of more humane systems.
Parlamentet behøver blot at tænke på svinene.
I want the House to think about pigs.
I 1987 krævede Parlamentet forbud mod tøjring af svin, men i dag forkastede det ændringsforslag nr. 33.
In 1987 Parliament asked for sow tethering to be banned, but today we have rejected Amendment No 33.
Kommissæren oplyste, at han agter at iværksætte en undersøgelse, og at han vil aflægge beretning til Parlamentet derom i januar 1994.
The Commissioner told us he wants to undertake an investigation and will report to Parliament by January 1994.
Jeg vil gerne høre, hvad Kommissionen har foretaget sig fra 1987 til nu.
I want to know what the Commission has been doing all these years since 1987.
Det, jeg står med her, er en anordning til tøjring af en drægtig so.
What I have here is a device used to tether a pregnant pig.
Denne rem går rundt om soens mave, og kæden, De ser, giver dyret dets eneste bevægelsesmulighed.
This strap goes around the pig's belly and the chain that you can see is its only room for movement.
Mit ændringsforslag tilstræbte afskaffelse deraf.
How would the Com missioner like it to be done to him?
Jeg håber, at De vil respektere det løfte.
My amendment sought to remove this.
De gav os i eftermiddag, og handle i den rette ånd.
I hope you will honour your promise to us this afternoon and act in the proper spirit.
Simmonds (ED), skriftlig. — (EN) Jeg er kommissæren taknemmelig for oplysningen om, at han kan acceptere en lang række ændringsforslag, som dog nu ikke alle er vedtaget af Parlamentet.
SIMMONDS (ED), in writing. — 1 am grateful to the Commissioner for his indication of the acceptance of a large number of amendments, not all of which have now been passed by Parliament.
Jeg deler fru Pollacks skuffelse over, at Parlamentet i eftermiddags ikke støttede ændringsforslaget om tøjring af søer.
I share Mrs Pollack's disappointment that the practice of tethering dry sows has not been supported in this House this afternoon.
Men grunden til, at jeg ikke kunne tilslutte mig hendes ændringsforslag, er, at det omfatter et forslag om at afskaffe farekassen, hvilket ærligt talt ikke kan lade sig gøre inden for landbruget på det nuværende stade.
But the reason I could not subscribe to her amendment is that it includes a proposal to do away with the farrowing-crate and that, frankly, is not something that can be done in agriculture at the present stage.
De ændringsforslag, som gik igen nem i eftermiddags, er så vidt jeg kan se dem, der påviseligt er gennemførlige.
The amendments that I believe have succeeded this after noon by and large are the amendments that de monstrably can be implemented.
Det er relativt få, som Kommissionen ikke kan acceptere, men jeg vil i de kommende måneder holde øje med, at Parlamentets synspunkter reelt omsættes i lovgivningen.
There are comparatively few which I feel the Commission cannot actually take on board and I shall be following this up over the coming months to make sure the views of the House are actually translated into legislation.
Seligman (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg stemmer for betænkningen af hr. Simmonds, som har gjort en kolossal indsats for husdyrs velfærd.
SELIGMAN (ED). — Mt President, I shall vote for this report by Mr Simmonds, who has done an enormous amount of work for the welfare of farm animals.
Hr. MacSharry gjorde rigtigt i at acceptere størstedelen af vore ændringsforslag.
Mr Mac Sharry has done well to accept most of our amendments.
Jeg kan imidlertid tikke tilgive socialisterne overfor, der stemte imod ændringsforslag nr. 24 om jernindsprøjtninger til kalve.
What I cannot forgive is the Socialists opposite, who voted against Amendment No 24 for injection of iron into calves.
Er det, fordi De for tid og evighed vil have blodfattigt hvidt kalvekød, eller ønsker De raske kalve?
Is it that they want this anaemic white calf meat to go on for ever or do they want the calves to be healthy ?
Det faktum, at de stemte imod ændringsforslag nr. 24, viser, at de ikke er interesserede i dyrenes velfærd i denne for bindelse.
The very fact that they voted against Amendment No 24 shows they have no interest in animal welfare in that direction.
Jeg stemmer for forslaget.
I shall be voting in favour.
') Dagsorden for næste mode: Se protokollen.
Agenda for the next sitting: see Minutes.
MØDET FREDAG DEN 6. APRIL 1990
SITTING OF FRIDAY, 6 APRIL 1990
Fiskeri ud for Sierra Leone — Betænkning (dok.
Fishing off Sierra Leone — Report (Doc.
A3-83/90) af Arias Cañete
A383/90) by Mr Arias Cañete
Nordsøkonferencen
North Sea Conference
A3-58/90) af Aulas
A358/90) by Mrs Aulas
(Protokollen godkendtes)
(The Minutes were approved) '
Formanden. — Protokollen fra mødet i går er omdelt.
AULAS (V). — (FR) Quite simply, Mr President, a word concerning my report, which was to have been taken during the last partsession.
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg den som godkendt.
I did what I could to ensure that it was called, but unfortunately it was not.
Aulas (V). — (FR) I al korthed, hr. formand, vedrørende den betænkning, jeg har lagt navn til, og som skulle have været vedtaget under sidste mødeperiode.
PRESIDENT. — Yesterday's Minutes have been distributed.
Denne betænkning vedrører nødhjælp til flygtninge fra Det Nære Østen.
The report concerns emergency aid to the refugees in the Middle East.
Det ville være ønskeligt, at den kom til afstemning samtidig med de øvrige betænkninger, der skal til afstemning. Jeg ville være Dem taknemmelig, hvis den kunne blive rykket frem på dagsordenen.
It would be desirable for the report to be adopted at the same time as the reports due to be voted on.
Staes (V). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg refererer til protokollen fra i går vedrørende begyndelsen af den aktuelle og uopsættelige debat.
STAES (V). — (NL) Mr President, with reference to yesterday's Minutes, at the start of the topical and urgent debate.
Der står i protokol len, at jeg skulle have rettet beskyldninger mod hr. A. Simpson, ikke hr. B. Simpson.
I read in the Minutes that I made accusations against Mr A. Simpson, not Mr B. Simpson.
Jeg havde allerede det indtryk i går, at han lagde mere i min udtalelse, end jeg havde ment.
It was already my impression yesterday that he was reading more into my intervention than I had intended.
For at gøre det helt klart: Jeg kom med den bemærkning, at hr. A. Simpson i længere tid, også via Kvæstorkollegiet, havde forsvaret det engelske byggefirmas interesser.
Let us be clear about this: I pointed out that Mr A. Simpson had spent considetable time, with the College of Quaestors among othets, representing the interests of British property firms.
Dette er han i sin gode ret til, lige så vel som jeg er i min gode ret til at tage anstød heraf.
He has every right to do so, just as I have every right to take issue with him.
Jeg har imidlertid aldrig sagt, at han er blevet bestukket.
I did not, however, speak of corruption.
Det fuldstændige mødereferat vil i øvrigt kunne bekræfte dette.
The Verbatim Report of Proceedings bears this out.
Hr. formand, jeg vil anmode om, at dette spørgsmål i det mindste forlægges for Udvalget for Forret ningsordenen og om Andragender, og at Præsidiet giver mig et svar på spørgsmålet om, hvilken artikel i Forretningsordenen det baserer sig på, om det er artikel 22, artikel 10 eller artikel 25.
WIJSENBEEK munities and I want an answet from the Bureau as to which of the Rules it bases itself upon, and whether Rule 22 is the relevant one, or perhaps Rule 25 or Rule 10.
Der er ingen tvivl om, at vi igen bliver nødt til at tale om hjemstedet og mødestederne her i forsamlingen, for der var jo kun tale om et par bygninger — et par bygninger fra eller til gør ingen stor forskel, hr. formand — men et fast hjemsted har vi endnu ikke, og derfor vil jeg gerne vide, hvilken artikel Præsidiet baserer sig på.
Doubtless we shall be coming back to the issue of the seat and places of work in this House since there have always been a number of buildings in contention — a few buildings more or less will make no difference, Mr President — but we are still without a petmanent seat, hence my reason for wanting to know on which Rule the Bureau bases itself.
Goedmakers (S). — (NL) Hr. formand, Hr. Price har netop omtalt en kedelig hændelse, der fandt sted i går.
GOEDMAKERS (S). — (NL) Mr President, Mr Price touched a moment ago on a very unfortunate incident which happened yesterday.
Med sit falkeblik mente hr. Price, at han fra den ene ende af salen var i stand til at konstatere uregelmæssigheder i den anden ende af salen.
Mr Price thought he could espy with an eagle eye from one end of the Chamber to the other that irregularities were going on.
Hvad så han?
What actually did he see ?
Han så, at jeg sad på plads nr. 200.
He saw I was sitting at seat number 200.
På plads nr. 198 sad fru García Arias, som, fordi hun havde en masse arbejde, ikke sad på sin egentlige plads, men på pladsen ved siden af.
In seat 198 sat Mrs Garcia Arias, who because she had a lot of work to do, which took up the whole seat, was not sitting in her own seat but in the one next to it.
Fru García Arias havde travlt, og der var afstemning.
Mrs Garcia Arias was occupied while the votes were being taken.
Hun havde stemt.
I looked to see if she had voted.
Hr. Price mente, at han burde gøre opmærksom på, at der var et medlem, der også havde stemt for et andet medlem, altså havde stemt to gange.
She bad voted. Mr Price's intention was to point out that one Member had voted in place of another, in other words that I had voted twice.
Fru García Arias trykkede igen selv på stemmeknappen.
Mrs Garcia Arias herself pressed her own voting button.
Efter afstemningen... ningen...
After the vote...
Formanden. — Det er der jo blevet redegjort for.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Wijsenbeek, we will pass this question on to the Bureau and if necessary refer it to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure.
Price (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, i protokollen kan man læse, at jeg i går under afstemningerne om Litauen gjorde opmærksom på, hvad der så ud som uregelmæssigheder under selve afstemningen.
PRESIDENT. — This point has already been dealt with.
Goedmakers. — (NL) Nej. hr. Price fremstillede det på en helt anden måde.
GOEDMAKERS (S). — (NL) No, Mr Price said something very different.
Hr. Price sagde, at han havde set uregelmæssigheder, men det er ikke tilfældet.
Mr Price said he had detected irregularities, which he did not.
Fra den anden side af salen...
He saw something across the Chamber...
Jeg har forstået, at hvad jeg på det pågældende tidspunkt sagde til Parlamentet tilsyneladende har forårsaget de to medlemmer visse kvaler, og det beklager jeg dybt.
PRICE (ED). — Mt President, it is recorded in the Minutes that yesterday during the votes on Lithuania I had observed what appeared to be certain irregularities during the course of the vote.
Han har taget sin beskyldning om, at vi skulle have snydt, tilbage.
He withdrew the charge that we had been guilty of fraud, but not that we had perpettated irregularities.
von Alemann (LDR). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg tillader mig at opkaste et helt andet spørgsmål: I forgårs stemte vi om Catasta-betænkningen, hvori der foreskrives arbejdstagerne fornuftige stole under arbejdet.
VON ALEMANN (LDR). — (DE) Mr President, I take the liberty of raising an entirely different matter: The day before yesterday we voted on the Catasta report, which stipulated sensible chairs for employees at work.
Formanden. — Fru Goedmakers, det spørgsmål er for længst bragt ud af verden.
PATTERSON (ED). — Mr President, could you clear up a small mystery about today's agenda ?
Beskyldningen blev tilbagekaldt.
Is this because the Commission in the end decided not to make a statement?
Nu findes der jo parlamentsmedlemmer, der er store, og andre, der er små. Jeg hører til de mindre.
Now there are Members who are large, and Members who are small.
Jeg har en stol, som er så ubekvem, at jeg ikke kan være til stede her i plenum hele ugen.
I have a chair that is so uncomfortable that I cannot remain in the Chamber the whole week.
Jeg har for fire uger siden skrevet til kvæstorerne, og jeg beder Dem om at gøre Deres indflydelse gældende, for at kvæstorerne i det mindste svarer mig, dersom de mener, at medlemmerne ikke har ret til en bekvem stol.
Four weeks ago I wrote to the Quaestors, and I would ask you to intercede on my behalf, asking the Quaestors to have the courtesy, if they believe that Members are not entitled to a comfortable chair, to write to me and say so.
Formanden. — Fru von Alemann, selv om det ikke var til forretningsordenen, vil jeg alligevel tage mig af sagen.
PRESIDENT. — Mrs von Alemann, that did not exactly relate to the Rules of Procedure but I will nevertheless consider the question.
Patterson (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, kan De kaste lys over et mindre mysterium vedrørende dagsordenen for i dag?
HABSBURG (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, you quite rightly pointed out that this was not a point of order, but I should nevertheless like to join Mrs von Alemann in raising another mattet.
Det ser den ikke ud til at være.
It is very unpleasant for them.
Skyldes det, at Kommissionen i sidste ende har besluttet ikke at fremsætte nogen redegørelse?
Why can we not finally ask the Council of Europe to be kind enough to allow these two people to sit down, since so far they have not been permitted to do so ?
Og i så fald tyder det så ikke på, at vi fra starten skulle have overholdt reglerne?
I would ask you to take up the matter.
Habsburg (PPE). — (DE) Hr. formand, De sagde ganske vist meget rigtigt, at det ikke var til forret ningsordenen, men jeg vil godt tilslutte mig fru von Alemann på endnu et punkt. Her nede under trap
PATTERSON (ED). — That has answered the question but then we should have asked Sir Leon Brittan first on Monday, should we not, before putting the matter on the agenda ?
Ford (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, som den, der fremsatte ønske om denne redegørelse, blev jeg kontaktet af en af Sir Leon Brittans medarbejdere,
PRESIDENT. — The matter will be looked into.
Jeg vil også gerne nævne, at fjerkræ transporteres til slagtning, og vi opfordrer indtrængende til, at det slagtes straks ved ankomsten.
I would also like to mention the fact that poultry are being transported for slaughter and we urge strongly that they should be killed on arrival.
Alt for ofte transporteres disse fugle i løbet af natten og efterlades derefter ved ankomsten i lastbilen, indtil de skal slagtes den følgende dag.
Too often these birds are transported overnight and then, on arrival, left in the lorry for slaughter the next day.
Denne praksis bør stoppes, og jeg opfordrer mine kolleger og Kommissionen til at støtte vort synspunkt.
This practice should be stopped and I ask my colleagues and the Commission to support our view on this.
B3-615/90) af Amaral for Udvalget for Transport og Turisme som afslutning på forhandlingen om beskatning af erhvervskøretøjer: vedtaget.
B3-615/90) by Mr Amaral on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism to wind up the debate on the taxation of commercial vehicles: adopted
Det er mig en glæde at kunne stemme for betænkningen og takke hr. Morris, men jeg tror, at vi kan opnå mere, hvis vi henviser denne betænkning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling og måske kan forhandle med hr. MacSharry, således at han kan tage hensyn til vores meget oprigtige bekymring vedrørende transportlængden for dyr til slagtning.
I have great pleasure in voting for the report and congratulate Mr Morris, but I do believe that we might achieve more if we referred this report back to Committee and perhaps negotiated with Mr Mac Sharry so that he might take into consideration our very real concerns about the length of journey of transport for slaughter.
A3-45/90) af Morris for Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter om forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet (KOM(89)322 — dok. C3-112/89) til forordning om beskyttelse af dyr under transport.
A3-45/90) by Mr Morris on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural De velopment on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(89) 322 — Doc.
Det for holder sig nemlig sådan, at der fra denne autonome portugisiske øregion årligt transporteres omkring 20 000 stykker kvæg til kontinentet, svarende til ét stykke kvæg pr. 12 indbyggere.
Each year 20 000 head of cattle — one for every 12 inhabitants — are transported from these islands which are an autonomous region of Portugal, to the European continent.
Disse transporter finder sædvanligvis sted under de elendigste betingelser, og som følge heraf kommer 15% af dyrene til skade, og 4% dør.
Because it takes place under very hazardous conditions, an average of 15% are injured and 4% die as a result of the conditions of transport.
Seligman (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er enig med fru Banotti i, at det er en skam, vi ikke fik
SELIGMAN (ED). — Mr President, I agree with Mrs Banotti that it is a pity we did not get the eight-hout limit to travel, but we have to be grateful for small mercies and the fact that an animal is caused injury in transport is now a legal offence if this goes through according to Mr Mac Sharry's undertaking.
Maher (LDR). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg går helt og aldeles ind for den mest humane behandling af alle dyr, uanset art, det være sig på vej til slagteriet eller ej.
However, I do not have quite the same degree of pleasure in the Commission's attitude as delineated by Mr Mac Sharry yesterday afternoon, and it is mainly on the question of slaughter and the journey times for animals for slaughter.
Når alt kommer til alt, er jeg landmand, og mit udkomme afhænger af den behandling, som dyrene i min varetægt får.
One of the greatest causes for concern in the Animal Welfare Committee has been the long journeys which animals have to undergo from farm to slaughterhouse.
begrænsningen på otte timers transporttid, men vi må være taknemmelige for lidt og det forhold, at det er strafbart, såfremt et dyr kommer til skade under transporten, for så vidt dette bliver gennemført, som hr. MacSharry har lovet.
Carcasses in chilled and frozen form can be substituted for live animals.
Ændringsforslag nr. 6 gør det strafbart at udsætte dyr for skade under disse transporter.
In the Simmonds report of 1987 we recommended that animals should be trans ported for slaughter as near as possible to the point of production.
Jeg vil gerne sige i relation til transporten af dyr, at det ikke kun er tidsfaktoren, der tæller, det er køretøjets tilstand, måden hvorpå dyrene lastes og antallet af dyr i et køretøj osv. Dette er vigtige faktorer, for som vi ved, ti timer i et tog kan være værre end tyve timer i et andet tog afhængigt af, hvor komfortabelt det er.
This principle has been supported by the veterinary professions in Europe, animal welfare organizations and very many producers.