natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Garcia Amigo (ED). — (ES) Hr. formand, De Europæiske Fællesskaber udgør et virkeligt juridisk fællesskab såvel ud fra sin oprindelse som sine handlinger.
In my opinion, Mr President, in the next few years the Commission should consider another proposal to check on non-implementation or incorrect implementation.
Det er også rigtigt, at sandhedens time for fællesskabsretten er det øjeblik, den skal finde anvendelse, dvs. tilpasningen af borgernes virkelige liv til institutionerne.
I mean, Mr President, that the law is implemented either by those specifically concerned, namely the citizens, or by the institutions of the State, or in this case the States.
Den betænkning, vi beskæftiger os med, bør efter undertegnedes mening i det mindste omfatte: ikke alene problemet med manglende gennemførelse — som man har insisteret på — men også mangelfuld gennemførelse.
Implementation by the States should cover legislative implementation, in other words, the transposing of Community legislation into national laws, either by the State or the national par liaments, or by the autonomous communities in fed eral or autonomous countries, such as Spain; it should also cover implementation by the administrative auth orities in their national or autonomous bodies and finally, by the judicial authorities of the national courts or the Luxembourg Court.
Vi har i dag talt om gennemførelse af allerede vedtagne retsregler, vedtaget i henhold til Fællesskabets derom gældende bestemmelser.
If Mr Van Miert were not now doing the honours for the Commission I might have felt obliged to allude to Nero playing his lyre while Rome was burning.
Men efter min mening kan man dog spørge, om problemet ikke også vedrører vort eget arbejde under udarbejdelsen af disse retsregler.
Of course the most serious fire has broken out precisely in Italy and what is the Commission doing about it?
Efter Den Fælles Europæiske Akt er Parlamentets rolle ikke længere den samme som før, den er ændret.
What concrete measures is the Com mission taking against an ever increasing delay in the application of Community law?
Vi har sagt dette flere gange, og jeg tror, at man virkelig må være sig dette bevidst.
From this outline, Mr President, it is possible to see where Community law is being incorrectly implemented.
Det forekommer mig faktisk, at der blandt os er en udbredt tendens til undervurdering af den rolle, vi spiller, og de muligheder, vi har for at øve indflydelse.
It cannot be tolerated that the Community institutions enact directives and these are not carried out.
Dette reflekteres også i vore lande og med fører den misforståede opfattelse, at de retsregler, vi udarbejder, også er så at sige andenrangs.
The directive on civil liability for products, whose implementation deadline expired in July last year, has still not been included in the national legislation of any Member State which did not already have its own legislation previously.
Vi må her i Parlamentet være blandt de første til at bekæmpe denne opfattelse overalt, hvor den måtte vise sig.
Rules still only exist in those Member States.
Efter min mening burde Kommissionen i de nærmest kommende år sætte ind på en anden front for at få klarhed over denne manglende eller mangelfulde gennemførelse.
Consequently, Mr President, in exercising its duty to monitor the other institutions, this Parliament must be firm in its demand that the Commission carry out its task of monitoring the implementation, non-implementation and incorrect implementation of Com munity law.
Dermed vil jeg sige, at gennemførelsen af fællesskabsretten skal foretages dels af de berørte eller borgerne, dels af statens (i dette tilfælde staternes) institutioner. Gennemførelsen bør fra sta ternes side omfatte såvel den lovgivningsmæssige gennemførelse, dvs. omplantningen af fællesskabs reglerne til de nationale regler, hvad enten den foretages af staten eller de nationale parlamenter eller af de selvstændige regioner i forbundsstaterne eller de autonome områder som i Spanien, som gennemførelsen fra den udøvende myndigheds side gennem dennes nationale eller autonome organer; og i sidste instans fra den dømmende myndigheds side gennem domstolene i nationalstaterne eller domstolen i Luxembourg.
BONACCINI (COM). — (IT) Mr President, this is a most curious situation, since on the one hand there is increasing evidence in favour of the establishment of a hierarchy of norms, at the top of which stand those laid down at European level, whilst on the other we have to put up with deplorable delays which various Members have referred to and which the Van Raay report goes into in some detail.
Jeg håber, at det kommende Parlament vil være i stand til at arbejde videre i denne retning og overvinde de vanskeligheder, vi har mødt, og at Kommissionen og Rådet i en aktion af denne art vil kunne se en styrkelse af deres prestige og myndighed og ikke endnu et angreb på deres forrettigheder.
The Commissioner may be more aware than anyone of the fact that Parliament has just been discussing the question of access to the occupation of road haulier, where the Commission is proposing to replace directives issued in 1974.
Man kan ikke tolerere, at fællesskabsinstanserne udsteder direktiver, og at disse så ikke bliver overholdt.
Our colleague Mr Bonaccini is crying crocodile tears and saying that this cannot be allowed to continue.
Direktivet om produktansvar, hvor fristen for gennemførelse udløb i juli sidste år, er endnu ikke blevet inddraget i den nationale lovgivning af nogen medlemsstat, som ikke allerede forud havde lovgivning på området.
Mr Bonaccini, it was your country's senate that ostentatiously accepted the need for a referendum to be held on the extension of the Community's powers.
Derfor, hr. formand, bør Parlamentet i udøvelsen af sin kontrolfunktion over for de øvrige institutioner stå fast på kravet om, at Kommissionen overholder
I take some comfort from the fact that the regularizing administrative instruments, which we are on our way to producing, will get us over the delays in the legal sphere.
Wijsenbeek (LDR). — (NL) Hr. formand, mange talere før mig har allerede henvist til, at vi rent faktisk står over for et problem.
We have spoken today of the application of standards already laid down, of standards issued under Com
Men den allerstørste brand er dog tydeligvis i gang i Italien, og hvad gør Kommissionen?
What do we see? I will give an example of something that happened recently.
Hvad ser vi? Jeg nævner et eksempel af nyere dato.
ment was delivered by a magistrate in Zwolle on the application of the bird directive.
I tirsdags i denne uge har en dommer i Zwolle afsagt en dom om anvendelsen af fugledirektivet, hvor dommeren ordret sagde — jeg så tilfældigvis sagsprotokollen, da det var en sag, der interesserede mig — » Ja, det vedrører her fællesskabsret, og det er så indviklet, at jeg egentlig har brug for mere tid, for det beskæftiger vi os aldrig med«.
The magistrate's words — I happen to have seen the record of the pro ceedings, as I was interested in the case — were as follows: 'Yes, Community law is involved; that is very complex and I really need more time, as we never have occasion to deal with it.'
Det er dog ikke længere muligt — og jeg ser, at hr. Garcio Amigo nikker — at vore retsinstanser kan gøre det, uden at de obligatorisk er uddannet i fællesskabsret. Hvor er vi så henne?
It is no longer acceptable — and I see Mr García Amigo nodding — that our legal authorities should be able to do such a thing without being obliged to follow courses in Community law.
Jeg har nu for tredje år i træk spurgt Kommissionen, og jeg ved, at Kommissionen ikke kan gribe ind i den dømmende magts selvstændige position, om den ikke venligst, nu da man endelig på det europæiske universitet i Firenze har indkaldt til konference mellem generaladvokaterne eller i hvert fald dem, der er ansvarlige for anvendelsen af den samme ret inden for hver medlemsstat, vil indkalde til endnu et møde for at nå frem til, at de nationale dommere anvender fællesskabsretten på samme måde.
I have now asked the Commission for the third year in succession — and I know that the Commission cannot encroach upon the independence of the judiciary — to please finally call a conference, for instance at the European University Institute in Florence, where the attorney generals, or at any rate those who are responsible for the application of equal rights in each of the Member States, are required to agree upon a consist ent application of Community law by national magistrates.
Ja, siger Kommissionen, det er en god ide, det vil vi gøre.
Yes, says the Commission, that is a good idea, we will do that.
Og hvad sker der? Intet!
And what happens?
Kommissionen sidder bare der, og hvad gør den, hr. formand? Intet!
The Commission just sits there and what does it do, Mr President?
Hvad må vi så gøre som Parlament?
So what is Parliament to do?
Det er hr. Herman, der er fremkommet med forslaget om eventuelt at give Kommissionen en reprimande.
It was our colleague Mr Herman who suggested that we might take the Commission to task.
Heller ikke her gælder det kommissær Van Miert, men jeg tror, at vi nu bør give denne reprimande, for Kommissionen sidder bare der og gør ingenting!
Once again this does not concern Mr Van Miert, but I think that we really ought now to take the Commission to task for sitting there and doing nothing!
I alle medlemssta ter uden undtagelse vokser antallet af ikke omsatte direktiver.
Quite frankly, his other remarks make that particular observation mean ingless.
Det forholder sig således, og det ved kommissæren måske bedre end nogen anden, at vi her i Parlamentet netop har talt om adgangen til transporterhvervet, et kommissionsforslag, der træder i stedet for direktiver fra 1974.
HERMAN (PPE). — (FR) Mr President, we can go on bemoaning the failure to apply Community law, each of us pointing the finger at a neighbour, Mr Croux at the Netherlands, Mr Wijsenbeek at Italy.
Det er det land, og hr. Bonaccini, der her taler med store krokodilletårer om, at det ikke kan fortsætte på denne måde, hr. Bonaccini, Deres land, hvor senatet med stort postyr vedtager, at der må afholdes en folkeafstemning om udvidelse af Fællesskabets beføjelser, og hvad gør Italien?
VAN MIERT, Member of the Commission. — (NL) Mr President, I am pleased that I can at last stand up and no longer have to remain seated, because I am under the impression that some people in the Chamber think I prefer to do otherwise.
Hvad gør det italienske parlament? Intet!
I wish to stand and am ready to air my grievances, as I feel this is in the course of things and rightly so.
Nej, det er sørgeligt.
That is quite clear.
Det drejer sig ikke kun om rettens gennemførelse, det går langt videre.
But I should first like to express satisfaction that Parliament has examined the Commission's report in such depth.
Det er en skam, at hr. Janssen van Raay ikke er til stede her til formiddag, han har også sagt helt tydeligt, at når Domstolen har afsagt en tydelig dom, og fællesskabsretten også er tydelig, og det er generelt ikke altid tilfældet, så må også de lavere stående dommere, og hr. Garcia Amigo har med rette henvist hertil, anvende fællesskabsretten mere direkte.
On behalf of the Commission I would like to promise that we will do our utmost to submit the annual report to Parliament more promptly after the end of the year under review.
Bonaccini (COM). — (IT) Hr. formand, da hr. Wijsenbeek har gjort mig den ære at citere mig, må jeg bede ham tage til efterretning, at jeg ikke repræsen
The dissatisfaction expressed in this connection was justified; I shall convey this dissatisfaction and — as I have said — I undertake personally to try and speed things up.
Van Miert, medlem af Kommissionen. — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg er glad for, at jeg endelig kan rejse mig op og ikke behøver at blive siddende, for jeg har indtrykket af, at visse kolleger her i salen fortolker det forkert.
We are pleased that the parliamentary com mittee agrees with the Commission's interpretation and actually identifies very closely with it.
Jeg rejser mig gerne op og vil stille mig ved grædemuren, for jeg har på fornemmelsen, at det er det. man gør her og med rette.
With res pect to 1992 in particular, both the Commission and Parliament believe that a special effort must be made to apply Community law, especially Community direc tives.
Hr. Alber sagde til at begynde med, at han egentlig var ked af, at vi måtte udarbejde en beretning her.
It is, after all, rare for directives on the internal market that are already in force to have been transposed into national law in all the Member States.
Sådan er det bare, for det drejer sig til syvende og sidst om manglende overholdelse af fællesskabsforpligtelser.
This means that there is still a lot of work left for the Com mission to do in this area and we are counting on Par liament's support, so that a special effort can be made over the next few months and years.
Det er klart og tydeligt.
This is the situation which threatens us.
Men lad mig så i første række udtrykke en vis tilfredshed med, at Parlamentet har undersøgt Kommissionens beretning grundigt.
I am pleased that this debate is taking place today, because this is one of the major stumbling blocks to the completion of the internal market with which we will be faced in the next few years.
Jeg vil gerne på Kommissionens vegne påtage mig den forpligtelse, at vi vil gøre alt for at forelægge årsberetningen hurtigere efter udgangen af det pågældende år for Parlamentet.
The Court of Justice, in a celebrated case, recognized that when a directive created rights benefiting certain citizens or certain enterprises, they could invoke them once the time allowed for carrying over these rights into national law had been exceeded.
Med rette er der blevet klaget herover; jeg skal viderebringe disse klager, og jeg lover som sagt at stile efter at lade det ske hurtigere.
I say a regulation, Mrs Vayssade, because I do not see how this could be done by means of a directive, since direc tives are not being transposed into national law.
Det glæder os også, at Parlamentets udvalg deler Kommissionens analyse og egentlig i vid udstrækning tilslutter sig den.
Con sequently, since a regulation is directly applicable as soon as it is published, I think it is the right instrument in this instance.
Især i forbindelse med 1992 er Kommissionen ligesom Parlamentet af den opfattelse, at der må gøres en ekstra indsats for gennemførelsen af fællesskabsretten og navnlig med hensyn til direktiverne.
Mr Janssen van Raay's draft resolution today raises a number of questions about the application of direc tives, which we have just been discussing; the problem is indeed how to transpose these into national law within the time limits provided for in the directive. The Commission is of course doing what it can.
Det er jo en sjældenhed, at allerede gældende direktiver vedrørende det store marked er omsat til national ret af alle medlemssta-
As you know, numerous cases are being investigated for reference if necessary to the Court of Justice, but I should just like to focus on Mr Herman's amendment.
Vi har i det belgiske parlament — hr. Croux ved det udmærket — haft eksemplet med et blandet udvalg af europæiske parlamentsmedlemmer og belgiske parlamentsmedlemmer.
Although the situation is still unsatisfactory in some respects, this is increasingly less the case as time goes on.
Der var nogen politisk tovtrækkeri heroin, men herved blev der jo til en vis grad lagt pres på de belgiske myndigheder, bl. a. også i parlamentet, så de handlede hurtigere.
However, we must also admit that Community law has become so farreaching and complex that it is obviously impossible for everybody to understand it fully.
Jeg er overbevist om, at samme fremgangsmåde også vil have en vis virkning i andre medlemsstater, og jeg tillader mig da også meget stærkt at anbefale og støtte dette forslag.
But the Commission does feel that things are moving in the right direc tion.
Hvad angår gennemførelsen af Domstolens domme, så deler jeg inderligt hr. Wijsenbeeks opfattelse.
We both want commitments entered into by the Member States to be honoured as promptly as possible.
Det er dog virkelig ikke acceptabelt i en retsstat, at man, når en domstol afsiger en dom, ikke fuldbyrder denne dom.
But your amendment in effect amounts to a proposal to transform a directive — a legal instrument provided for in the Treaties — into a regulation, unless it is transposed into national law within the time limit laid down.
Dette vedrører retsstatens grundlag og må derfor ikke ske.
Well, we can discuss this at length, but it is a question of effect.
Også der må man regne med, at de demokratiske kræfter i Europa-Parlamentet, i de nationale parlamenter protesterer, hvis man gør krav på — og det gør vi jo alle — at være en ordentlig, demokratisk retsstat.
The Court of Justice has actually defined direct applicability in a number of cases, but it has not given a general definition.
Men må følgelig sørge for, at detr er en æressag, at Domstolens domme respekteres fuldt ud.
In fact, you are requesting a sort of amendment to the Treaties, whereby the judgments of the Court of Justice in a number of individual cases or specific situations would become a general principle.
Om holdningen hos de høje retsinstanser i medlems staterne til fællesskabsretten har Kommissionens tjenestegrene udarbejdet en rapport, som den har god kendt, og som inden længe vil blive offentliggjort; selv om situationen her og der stadig er utilfredsstillende, bedres den dog med tiden.
But in that case, Mr Her man — and here I share Mrs Vayssade's view — you are faced with an extension, a general rule, whereby the decision is left to the Court of Justice.
Der er også en proces i gang. og hr. Wijsenbeek har ret i, at uddannelsen i visse retsinstanser er for ringe.
There is no need for us to get involved in a legal discussion here, but I assume that I am upholding the correct position of the Commission.
Vi må imidlertid også indrømme, at fællesskabslovgivningen er blevet så omfattende, så indviklet, at enhver naturligvis ikke kan være fuldt underrettet.
I nonetheless understand your concern only too well and if the Commission could find a way of making the transposition of Community law into national law quicker and more efficient, it would certainly not hesitate to take the opportunity.
Dog går det efter Kommissionens mening i den rigtige retning.
But I do not think we can go ahead and adopt this amendment as it stands.
Kommissionen gør naturligvis, hvad den kan.
In other words a broad approach to the study of law in the Member States among other things would be preferable.
De ved, at utallige sager undersøges for om nødvendigt at blive indbragt for Domstolen, men jeg vil gerne lige slå ned på hr. Hermans ændringsforslag.
I will not enlarge on this. It is certainly possible to do more in this area and this includes training and in-service training for lawyers, magistrates and civil servants.
Jeg forstår kun hensigten alt for godt.
However, these activities will have to be stepped up.
Men hensyn hertil er der vist ingen delte meninger mellem Dem og Kommissionen. Vi ønsker begge, at de forpligtelser, som medlemsstaterne indgår, også hurtigst muligt respekteres.
In addition, the Commission is drawing up an action programme with the aim of encouraging universities to promote the study of Community law at all levels and in the various branches of law and to give European issues the place to which they are entitled in other curricula.
Men det ændringsforslag, som De her stiller, går egentlig ud på, at når et direktiv, der nu engang er det instrument, der er nævnt i Traktaten, efter udløbet af den tidsfrist, inden for hvilken det skal være omsat til national ret, ikke er blevet omsat, så skal det laves til en forordning.
The Commission is also considering the possibility of submitting a draft resolution to the Ministers for Justice and Ministers for Education with a view to the general introduction of Community law for law students and better training for magistrates and civil servants in this area.
Se, det kan vi diskutere længe, men til hvilken nytte?
It is also prepared to provide both moral and financial support for any initiatives at a national level.
Domstolen har i en række tilfælde faktisk fastslået den direkte anvendelighed, men ikke på et generalt grundlag, og her beder De egentlig om, at der sker en slags traktatsændring, hvorved det, som Domstolen har vedtaget i en række individuelle tilfælde eller særlige situationer, generaliseres.
I go along much more unreservedly with what has been said by Mr Croux and other speakers: that the European Parliament is trying to step up pressure through the national parliaments, while the Commission is endeavouring in its own way to do the same, sometimes unfortunately facing prolonged proceed ings as well as much resistance from the national governments.
Men så, hr. Herman, og her deler jeg fru Vayssades opfattelse, står man jo naturligvis foran en udvidelse, foran en generel foranstaltning, hvor det nu overlades til Domstolen — ja, vi må ikke geråde i en juridisk disput, men jeg antager, at jeg her forsvarer Kommissionens korrekte standpunkt.
We have had the example in the Belgian parliament, with which Mr Croux is very familiar, of a joint committee comprising members of the Belgian parliament and the European Parliament.
Når dette er sagt, forstår jeg kun alt for godt Deres bekymring, og hvis vi kunne finde et middel til på en hurtigere og mere effektiv måde at nå frem til omsættelse til national ret, så skal sagen ikke strande på manglende vilje fra Kommissionens side.
At a certain point a report was drafted concerning the fact that the Belgian authorities were also delaying somewhat in transposing directives into national or regional law, for example in the sphere of environment protection. Well, the report had a positive impact.
Men jeg tror ikke, at vi uden videre overtage dette ændringsforslag i den foreliggende udformning.
I am convinced that a similar strategy in other Member States would produce a cer tain effect and I take the liberty of strongly recommending and supporting this suggestion.
Nu en sidste ting : de ærede medlemmer har her forskellige gange henvist til, at der må ske en større spredning af kendskabet til fællesskabsretten.
With regard to enforcing the Court's decisions, I absolutely agree with Mr Wijsenbeek.
Det er bestemt muligt at gøre endnu mere på dette område, også ved uddannelse af advokater, dommere og tjenestemænd og ved efteruddannelse af allerede praktiserende advokater, dommere og tjenestemænd. Som bekendt organiserer Kommissionen allerede
Here, too, the democratic forces in the European Parliament and the national parliaments must be depended upon to protest, if we are claiming — as we all do — to be respectable, democratic States governed by the rule of law.
Kvinder og sundhed (fortsættelse)
Women and health (continuation)
Formanden. — Jeg foretager afstemning om hr. Prouts forslag om at henvise fru Van Dijks betænkning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling.
PRESIDENT. — The next item is the continuation of the debate on the report (Doc.
(Fornyet udvalgsbehandling forkastedes)
A 2165/88) by Mrs van Dijk, on behalf of the Committee on Women's Rights, on women and health.1
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er fortsættelse af forhandlingen om betænkning (dok.
D'ANCONA (S), Chairwoman of the Committee on Women's Rights. — (NL) Mr President, it is not surprising that the social status of women is reflected in all aspects of daily life, nor is it surprising that the World Congress of Gynaecologists, which is to be held this May with the Commission's support, has chosen as its central theme the link between women's social status and their health.
A2165/88) af Van Dijk for Udvalget om Kvinders Rettigheder om kvinder og sundhed ')·
And so it is not surprising that the Committee on Women's Rights has taken this theme and drafted an own-initiative report on it, which is at last on the agenda today.
Prout (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, de spørgsmål, der rejses i denne betænkning, er yderst komplicerede.
PROUT (ED). — Mr President, I think the issues raised by this report are extremely complicated.