natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Derfor anmoder jeg om, hr. formand, idet jeg priser hr. Prags udmærkede arbejde, at dette punkt tages af dagsordenen for indeværende mødeperiode.
Heads of State — and important ones at that, such as Mr Mitterand and Mr Santer — answered your question and Mr Mitterand agreed that
Arndt (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg har hidtil ikke noget sted i Pragbetænkningen læst. at det drejer sig om Parlamentets hjemsted eller om denne beslutning
Approval of Minutes — Membership of Parliament — Verification of credentials — Request for the waiver of parliamentary immunity — Membership of political groups — Petitions — Declarations entered in the register — Transfers of appropriations — Documents received— Text of Treaties forwarded by the Council: see Minutes.
Vi disponerer ikke i dette øjeblik over disse hundreder af ændringsforslag, og under hensyn til betænkningens yderst ømtålelige karakter og ændringsforslagene anmoder jeg om tilbagevisning af betænkningen. ningen.
But now it really is high time Parliament decided how to function rationally. This decision is not reserved for the heads of government, but is a decision that Parlia­ment has to make for itself, which is why I reject the postponement and withdrawal of this report.
Formanden. — Vi vil få lejlighed til at overveje disse ændringsforslag fra nu af og til på onsdag, hvor vi skal stemme om dem.
We have been informed about the change in the agenda as regards the vote on this report and also about the hundreds of amendments which have to be examined in great detail.
Om det har vi her i Parlamentet allerede fiere gange truffet beslutning.
this question should be put on the agenda of one of the next summits.
Jeg er af den opfattelse, at især den sidste afgørelse fra Domstolen i spørgsmålet om de normale møder i Strasbourg nu udtrykkeligt må accepteres af Parlamentet.
He gave the impression that at any rate he wanted this question to be put on the agenda of a summit during the French Presidency.
Det må stå klart, at de normale møder finder sted i Strasbourg.
Mr Santer, the Luxembourg Prime Minister, agreed.
Jeg finder det simpelt hen ikke forsvarligt længere over for Strasbourg og den franske regering, at dette spørgsmål forbliver uklart.
Mr Kohl was of the same opinion and Mrs Thatcher said this week that she agreed that the question of the seat should be discussed in the near future.
Jeg sætter anmodningen om, at Pragbetænkningen (dok.
I put to the vote the request that the Prag report (Doc.
A2-316/88) om institutionernes hjemsted tages af dagsordenen, under afstemning.
A 2-316/88) on the seat of the institutions should be withdrawn from the agenda.
(Anmodningen forkastedes) ')
(Parliament rejected the proposal)1
Jeg har modtaget en anmodning fra Den Liberale Gruppe om, at anden betænkning (dok.
I have received a request from the Liberal and Demo­cratic Reformist Group for the second report (Doc.
A2-312/88) af Provan om fiskeressourcerne i det sydvestlige Atlanterhav tilbagevises til udvalget.
A 2-312/88) by Mr Provan on the depletion of South West Atlantic fishing resources to be referred back to committee.
Det forekommer mig imidlertid også at være nødvendigt — også selv om det måske ikke mere vil få nogen indvirkning — til næste valgperiode at forbedre arbejdsmulighederne for udvalgene og grupperne i Bruxelles.
But I also consider it necessary — even if this may not be feasible now — to improve the working conditions of the committees and political groups in Brussels for Parliament's next legislature.
Den. der er bange for, at der nu træffes en eller anden præcedensbeslutning, burde dog tage hensyn til det store flertal af kollegerne, der som direkte valgte medlemmer simpelt hen ikke mere kan udføre deres arbejde i Bruxelles, fordi denne beslutning fra Parlamentet udestår.
Anyone who is afraid that this is some kind of preliminary decision should have a thought for the large majority of our col­leagues, who just cannot manage their work as directly-elected representatives in Brussels because Parliament has not yet taken a decision on this matter.
Veil (LDR). — (FR) Hr. formand, det drejer sig om en betænkning, der fremtræder meget banalt, som om det kun drejede sig om at bevare fiskeressourcerne i dette område af det sydvestlige Atlanterhav.
VEIL (LDR). — (FR) Mr President, the report in question is a report on the fisheries which gives a very trivial impression, as if the only problem were the preservation of fishing resources in the South West Atlantic.
Nu kan jeg ganske vist godt forstå herskende aversioner.
I do understand the objections.
Jeg kan forstå, at en række medlemmer siger : Her er der det problem, at arbejdssted C eller arbejdssted A eller arbejdssted B på en eller anden måde bliver forfordelt. Jeg anser det dog ikke for parlamentarisk korrekt, at man, fordi man er bange for, at en beslutning eventuelt berører et arbejdssted, fremdrager andre storartede argumenter for at tage dette emne af dagsordenen!
I understand why some members say that this raises the problem of dis­crimination against place of work A, Β or C. How­ever, I think it is wrong for a parliament to put for­ward high-faluting arguments for withdrawing such a subject from the agenda because of fears that a deci­sion might possibly affect a given place of work!
Jeg beklager, at en sådan betænkning, selv om den er særdeles udmærket på det fiskerimæssige plan, ser ud til at dreje sig om, at Fællesskabet først og fremmest er interesseret i at bevare sine egne fiskeri muligheder i disse fjerne områder.
I regret the fact that such a report, although perfectly adequate as far as the fisheries are concerned, seems to consider that above all the Community is concerned about preserving its own fishing potential in these remote regions.
De 518 medlemmer af Parlamentet bliver så tit konfronteret med dette spørgsmål, at det efter min mening egentlig ville være at fornærme hver enkelt, hvis der blev sagt : » Du har endnu ikke gjort dig tanker nok om dette spørgsmål.
The 518 members of this Parliament come up against this question so often that I feel it would be a personal insult to any of them to say: 'You haven't given enough thought to these matters'.
« Vi havde Zagaribetænkningen.
We have had the Zagari report.
Vi havde også andre betænkninger.
We have had other reports as well.
Pragbetænkningen har vi forberedt i lang, lang tid.
It took a very long time to draft the Prag report.
') For de øvrige ændringer af onsdagens dagsorden : se protokol len.
For other changes to Wednesday's agenda: see Minutes.
Provan hvis det var tilfældet, ville jeg foreslå, at vi udsatte forespørgslen til februar for at få et meningsfuldt svar.
Democratic Alliance on the difficulties facing the fish ing industry in Scotland will be included as a footnote to the joint debate on fisheries.
Det er et virkelig vigtigt spørgsmål, som Parlamentet som helhed ønsker besvaret tilfredsstillende.
directly involved and that in this area, which includes the Falkland islands, extremely important political interests are at stake.
Vi var klar over, at Det Politiske Udvalg også kiggede på denne sag om det sydvestlige Atlanterhav og de politiske relationer i den del af verden.
We realized that the Pol itical Affairs Committee are also looking at this matter of the South West Atlantic, and the political relation ships in that part of the world.
Ja, det er en kollega til fru Veil. hr. Delorozoy, der er ordfører, forstår jeg, i Det Politiske Udvalg, og vi har drøftet denne sag før nu.
Indeed, it is a colleague of Mrs Veil, Mr Delorozoy, who is the rapporteur, I understand, in the Political Affairs Committee and we have discussed this matter before now.
Vi har nu denne enstemmighed.
We now have that unanimity.
Der foreligger ingen ændringsforslag til betænkningen for forsamlingen, så det er virkelig en betænkning uden kontroverser grupperne imellem.
There are no amendments to the report before the House so it is really a noncontroversial report between the political groups.
Jeg finder det noget uheldigt, at dette spørgsmål er blevet rejst på dette sene stadium, når det kunne have været rejst, da sagen var på dagsordenen for 23 måneder siden.
It is rather unfortunate that this matter has been raised at this late stage when it could have been raised when it was on the agenda two or three months ago.
Ethvert spørgsmål kunne fru Veil have rejst dengang.
Any difficulties could have been raised by Mrs Veil at that time.
Jeg vil derfor foreslå, hr. formand, at denne betænkning går videre, for den er temmelig påtrængende, for så vidt angår fiskerierhvervet.
I would suggest therefore Mr President, that this report should go ahead because it is rather urgent as far as the fishing industry is concerned.
Ewing (RDE). — (EN) Hr. formand, under den debat, som min gruppe sørgede for i december — og som i realiteten var en redegørelse fra Kommissionen med spørgsmål — viste kommissær Cheysson megen sympati, men sagde i virkeligheden, at det måtte påhvile den nye kommissær at gøre dette til sin første hovedpine at se på alle de spørgsmål, der ville blive stillet ham af mange medlemmer fra alle sider i salen.
EWING (RDE). — Mr President, in the debate which my group secured in December — which was really a statement from the Commission with questions — Commissioner Cheysson was very sympathetic, but said in effect, that it would be for the new Commissioner to make this his first concern and to look at all the questions that were put before him by many Mem bers from all sides of the House.
Jeg nærer forhåbninger og tillid til Kommissionens gode vilje til, at det vil ske.
I would hope and trust in the Commission's good faith that this will happen.
Enhver udsættelse vil være meget alvorlig i lyset af den krise, som denne mundtlige forespørgsel drejer sig om.
Any delay would be very serious in the light of the crisis that this oral question relates to.
Det er en af de alvorligste kriser, der har ramt fiskeriet i Nordsøen siden 1975.
It is one of the gravest crises that has hit fishing in the North Sea since 1975.
Der ville være udbredt skuffelse og frustration, hvis den blev udsat til februar.
There would be widespread disappoint ment and despair if this was postponed until February.
Jeg stoler simpelt hen på, at Kommissionen vil indfri hr. Cheyssons løfte om, at den vil blive regulært behandlet.
I am just trusting that the Commission will honour Mr Cheysson's commitment that this will be dealt with properly.
Jeg ved ikke, om fru Veil er klar over, at hovedparten af det fiskeri, der finder sted nede i dette område, udføres af den spanske fiskerflåde.
I do not know if Mrs Veil realizes that the bulk of the fishing industry that takes place down in that area is conducted by the Spanish fleet.
Det er livsnødvendigt, at de spanske fiskerbåde har adgang til disse vande på et permanent grundlag.
It is vital that the Spanish fishing boats have access to those waters on a continuing basis.
Vi føler, at det er nødvendigt på indeværende tidspunkt at pålægge Kommissionen at gå i lag med erhvervet, så vi kan sikre, at vi fastholder så stort et fiskeripotentiel for vor udvidede fællesskabsflåde som muligt.
We feel that it is necessary to instruct the Commission at the present time to get to grips with the industry so that we can make sure that we do maintain as much fishing potential for our enlarged Community fleet as possible.
Jeg anbefaler derfor forsamlingen, at denne betænkning går igennem efter planen.
I therefore recommend to the House that this report should go through as scheduled.
Formanden. — Mundtlig forespørgsel til Kommissionen (B2-1309/88) af Gruppen Europæisk Demokratisk Alliance om vanskelighederne for fiskeriindustrien i Skotland indgår som en fodnote i for handlingen under ét om fiskeri.
PRESIDENT. — This was raised in the enlarged Bureau this morning and I was given an assurance that the Commission would do their best to cover these fisheries reports and the question of the footnote which will be added.
Formanden. — Vi skal prøve at putte den ind, hr. Arndt.
I hope that they will be able to give a fuller answer on Thursday.
A2-317/88) om sundhedsgarantier mod nematoder ved afsætningen af fisk og fiskerivarer tilbagevises til udvalget.
PRESIDENT. — The oral question to the Commission (B 2-1309/88) by the Group of the European
Kan vi imidlertid få et løfte fra Kommissionen, inden vi enes om at sætte det på dagsordenen, om, at Kommissionen og den nye kommissær vil være i stand til at give os et meningsfyldt svar på forespørgslen?
ARNDT (S). — (DE) Mr President, when you referred to these questions for oral answer with debate this morning you only mentioned an oral question with debate on fishing in Scotland.
Bangemann, medlem af Kommissionen. — (DE) Hr. formand, Kommissionen kan selvfølgelig komme med en erklæring om det. Imidlertid er der med hensyn til det her ytrede ønske om, at erklæringen skal være så konkret som muligt, nogle vanskeligheder.
PRESIDENT. — We shall try to fit that in, Mr Arndt.
For det første bliver disse undersøgelser først indledt netop nu.
The Commission is prepared to accept this and duly complete its draft.
Derfor kan jeg i mange tilfælde ikke komme med præcise detaljer.
Firstly, the investigations have only just begun, which means that in some cases I am unable to provide many details.
For det andet berører disse undersøgelser mange privatpersoners interesser, og derfor må Kommissionen i den henseende lade en vis diskretion råde.
Furthermore, the investigations affect the interests of many private individuals and therefore the Commission must exercise some discretion.
Sherlock (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er bange for, at jeg trods den betydeligt kølnende begejstring for afstemning, der er så iøjnefaldende for øjeblik ket, må råde min gruppe og alle andre, der kunne tænke sig at følge udvalgets henstilling, til at afvise denne anmodning fra PPE-Gruppen om endnu en politisk genspejling her i huset fra det troldspejl, der synes at øve indflydelse på så meget i tilløbet til den 18. juni.
SHERLOCK (ED). — Mr President, I am afraid that, despite the considerable falling off in enthusiasm for voting which is so evident at the moment, I must advise my group, and any one else who would care to follow the recommendation of the committee, to reject this proposal by the EPP Group for yet a further political reflection in this House of that distorting mirror which seems to be influencing so much in the run-up to 18 June.
Udvalgets beslutning, der blev truffet på grundlag af et løfte fra Kommissionen som svar på et spørgsmål fra et socialistisk medlem, var, at denne sag skulle afvente endnu et dokument, som vi fik løfte om var på vej fra Kommissionen.
The committee's decision, reached on the basis of a promise by the Commission in response to a question by a Socialist Member, was that this matter should be deferred for a further document which we are assured is coming forward from the Commission.
Hvis den ærede forsamling er indforstået med, at Kommissionen endnu en gang fremlægger sin generelle holdning til disse spørgsmål, vil den gerne gøre det.
If the House agrees to let the Commission reiterate its general position on these questions, it will be glad to do so.
Men jeg vil bede om forståelse for, at vi ikke kan være så konkrete, som man kan forvente det af os i andre tilfælde.
But I would ask you to understand that we can not be as specific as could be expected under different circumstances.
(Det således ændrede forslag til dagsorden tes) ')
(Parliament adopted the agenda as amended)}
Det aktuelle indhold af denne debat i første runde, hr. formand og hr. Klepsch, blev behandlet mere end bredt i udvalget.
The current aspect of the present round on debate was, Mr President and Mr Klepsch, more than fully debated in that committee.
Hvis vi vil have nogen respekt overhovedet for udvalgsproceduren, vil jeg råde for samlingen til strikt og strengt at holde sig til denne indstilling.
If we are to have any respect for committee procedure at all, I would counsel this House to adhere strictly and strongly to that recommendation.
Lad det blive drøftet, lad det blive behandlet af forsamlingen med den kærlighed, respekt eller indignation, som forsamlingen finder passende.
Let it be debated, let it be treated by this House with such affection, respect or indignation as this House decides.
Bloch von Blottnitz (ARC). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne bede forsamlingen tilslutte sig anmodningen af følgende årsag: Jeg har tidligere været ordfører i denne sag.
BLOCH VON BLOTTNITZ (ARC). — (DE) Mr President, I would ask the House to accept this request, given that I was previously rapporteur for this subject.
Det hele fik i sin tid et uheldigt forløb, og derfor afgav jeg ordførerskabet.
The undertaking was unsuccessful and I there fore resigned my position as rapporteur.
Nu har vi chancen for at gøre noget totalt ufornuftigt fornuftigt igen. og denne historiske chance skal vi ikke lade gå fra os.
We now have the chance to rectify a situation which is totally absurd and we should not let this historic opportunity pass us by.
Derfor bør denne betænkning vises tilbage til udvalget.
This is why the report in question should be referred back to the committee.
(Tilbagevisning til udvalget vedtoges) ')
(Parliament decided to refer the report back to com mittee).1
Formanden. — Inden vi går videre med dagsordenen, vil jeg sige, at der er mange venner og gæster fra mange lande til stede på tilhørerpladserne.
Request for urgent procedure — Deadline for tabling amend ments — Speaking time: see Minutes.
Som medlemmerne vil vide, er det det første møde i otte år i det fælles parlamentariske udvalg, der er nedsat som led i Tyrkiets associering til Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
President and Immunities has considered that there were grounds for applying our consistent judicial practice, especially since the remarks against the firm Auricchio SpA were not made in personae against that company individually, but against all companies, such as Auriccio SpA, which have delayed making payments to farmers as a result of the particular VAT system which is applied in in Italy.
De vil også erindre, at vi i september vedtog en betænkning fra Det Politiske Udvalg, der opfordrede til genetablering af det parlamentariske samarbejde under associeringen.
Political Affairs Committee which called for the reestablishment of parliamentary cooperation within the association.
Delegationen fra den store tyrkiske nationalforsamling er under ledelse af dennes formand, hr. Biilent Akarcali.
The Grand National Assembly delegation is led by its Speaker, Mr Bülent Akarcali.
Han ledsages af mange af sine kolleger, som jeg også byder velkommen.
He is accompanied by many of his colleagues, whom I also welcome.
De har allerede gjort os det klart, at de er meget glade for at være her på dette tidspunkt, der er så vigtigt for den udvikling af vore gensidige relationer, som jeg håber vil krones med alt muligt held.
They have already made clear to us their very great satisfaction in being here at this important moment in the development of our mutual relations, which we hope will be attended with every success.
Jeg er sikker på, at vi alle ønsker det fælles udvalg et meget godt og konstruktivt møde.
I am sure that we all wish the Joint Committee a very good and constructive meeting.
Jeg glæder mig til at mødes med Dem alle.
I look forward to meeting you all.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok. A2-340/88) af Donnez for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Med lemmernes Immunitet om anmodning om ophævelse af Nino Pisonis parlamentariske immunitet.
In other words, it is a statement which I have categorized as in globo rather than against any individual or specific company and in accordance with our consist ent practice, here again there is an additional factor because, to take our opinion to its logical conclusion, it can be held that Auricchio SpA can always get damages from the competent civil court if it considers that it has been wronged by our colleague's statements.
Vi vil naturligvis rådføre os med Kommissionen. Jeg beder ikke kommissæren svare på stående fod i dette øjeblik, medmindre hr. Bangemann ønsker det. Det er bestemt en sag, der kun kan behandles inden for det kvarter, Kom missionen har til sine svar.
But that is no longer our concern.
') Anmodning om uopsættelig forhandling — Frist for at stille ændringsforslag — Taletid: se protokollen.
PRESIDENT. — The next item is the report (Doc.
Donnez (LDR), ordforer. — (FR) Kære kolleger.
DONNEZ (LDR), rapporteur. — (FR) My dear col leagues, the Italian Minister of Justice has sent us a request, submitted by the competent public prosecutor — in this case the prosecutor of Monza — asking for the waiver of our colleague Mr Nino Pisoni's parliamentary immunity for the following reasons.
Den Italienske Republiks justitsminister har på foranledning af statsadvokaten i Monza sendt os en anmodning om ophævelse af Nino Pisonis parlamentariske immunitet på grund af en klage, som selskabet Auricchio SpA har indgivet mod hr. Pisoni for over for en journalist fra Milano-avisen // Giornale ordret at skulle have erklæret følgende : » Mælkeproducenterne har fortsat deres leverancer til et stort selskab som Aurecchio, selv om de må vente seks måneder på deres betaling«.
A com plaint which I have categorized as slander has been lodged against Mr Pisoni by the firm Auricchio SpA following his statement to a journalist from the Milan newspaper 'Il Giornale' that 'breeders continue to supply large enterprises such as Auricchio even though they have to wait six months before receiving pay ment'.
Disse udtalelser skader nævnte virksomheds forretningsmæssige anseelse — efter fransk ret sammenligner jeg dem med bagvaskelse — hvilket er begrundelsen for klagen og anmodningen om ophævelse af hr. Pisonis parlamentariske immunitet.
Such statements could undermine commercial confidence in that company — in French law I would categorize that is slander — hence the complaint, and hence the request for the waiver of our colleague's parliamentary immunity.
Pannella (NI). — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg er helt enig og vil stemme for Donnez-betænkningen; men jeg vil gerne sige, at vi generelt ønsker, at » retfærdigheden« frit sker fyldest, især i Italien, hvor der meget oftest anmodes om ophævelse af immunitet, og hvor, hvis den ophæves, retsvæsenet ikke følger sagen op.
PANNELLA (NI). — (FR) Mr President, I entirely agree and I would like to say that I am going to vote for Mr Donnez's report, however I should say that generally speaking we would like justice to run its natural course, especially in Italy where very often we are asked to waive immunity and then if the waiver is granted, the judicial process does not run its course.
Dette sker ofte, og jeg fremsætter desuden ønske om, at der foretages en undersøgelse af. hvorledes det italienske retsvæsen opfølger de ophævelser af immunitet, som vi har vedtaget.
This happens regularly and, Mr President, I would like an inquiry into the action which has been taken by the Italian judicial system following the waivers of parliamentary immunity we have voted for in the past Generally speaking, the judicial process goes no fur ther.
Hvad angår de ord. som tillægges vor kollega, hr. Pisoni, mener jeg, at hr. Donnez har ret; men jeg vil også fremføre, at jeg meget alvorligt betvivler, at der har været noget ønske om bagvaskelse, eller at der har være tale om et indlysende tilfælde af bagvaskelse.
As regards the remarks attributed to our colleague, Mr Pisoni, I think that Mr Donnez is right, and I must say that I very much doubt whether there was any desire to slander or that a blatant slander actually took place. Once again, I agree with Mr Donnez because it seems
Jeg er også her enig med hr. Donnez, da det ville være lidt latterligt at give retsvæsenet frit spil i et sådant tilfælde, samtidig med at man under lignende omstændigheder i Frankrig og i andre lande indrømmer, at der kastes med sten, eller folk slås fordærvet.
Pannella to me that, whereas in France and elsewhere it is accepted that people throw stones or make criticisms, in this case it would be rather ridiculous to allow justice to run its natural course.