natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
De må tro mig, når jeg siger, at dette er et endnu mere kompliceret spørgsmål.
I am pleased to note that the Com mission has included a proposal for such a directive in its legislative programme for the coming quarter, so that we shall soon have it to hand.
Hvad angår de humanitære bestemmelser og dem, der vedrører helbredet, vil vi næste år få mulighed for at se, hvad denne sag omfatter, idet man i Den Internationale Arbejdsorganisation vil drøfte en ophævelse af for buddet mod natarbejde for kvinder.
What is certain is that until now the efforts made by the Com mission to tackle the real problem of differences in pay have been in vain because, I repeat, Mrs De Backer, the problem is not a legal one; all the constitutions, the Treaty of Rome, our directives and ILO agreements embody the principle of equal pay for equal work, irrespective of sex.
Som De vil vide, er der store meningsforskelle mellem fagforeningerne og kvindernes egne organisationer om natarbejde for kvinder.
It is not a legal problem; it is a much more complex problem, since it is in the equivalence of jobs that in fact and in reality the discrimination between men and women takes place.
Vi vil fremlægge denne sag i ILO og vil forsøge at gennemføre en åben debat, for derefter på grundlag af denne konkrete sag at begynde en analyse af de regler der, som det er blevet sagt af fru Vayssade, blev givet for at beskytte kvinderne, men som med udviklingen, den økonomiske krise og struktu-
As regards equality of treatment there is the problem of legislation protecting women and you know that according to this directive the Member States must revise those protective laws in which the purpose which gave rise to the creation of the rule has disappeared. I have to inform you that until 1987, however, very little was done and it was for that reason that the Commission adopted in March 1987, you will remem-
Der er blevet nævnt en række yderligere vanskeligheder omkring erhvervsklassificering.
This is necessary in order to give women access to justice, so that examples of indirect discrimination can be established and defined.
1 - C2-259/87) rændringerne i produktionssystemerne ikke alene ikke beskytter kvinderne, men de facto diskriminerer dem i nogle henseender.
Let all people bring up their children as they think best and have the type of relations they desire with their partners.
Vi vil så få at se, hvor meget denne debat giver. Det kommende år bliver meget interessant, fordi det vil være den første internationale samling i ILO, hvor man måske ophæver en regel, som er til fordel for kvinderne, idet det at arbejde om natten for år tilbage blev betragtet som skadeligt og negativt for kvinderne.
These are, I repeat, ques tions which fall within the individual liberty of each citizen and the Commission will not engage in any kind of legislative activity in this matter.
Til slut vil jeg om moderskabet sige, at Kommissionen er ved at forberede nogle retningslinier om be skyttelse af kvinder under graviditet, og vi vil forsøge at fastlægge en kodex om praksis på dette område.
ber, a communication on this subject aimed precisely at analysing the situation and at reminding all the Member States of their legal obligations.
Hvad angår forældreorlov, vil jeg gentage, hvad jeg allerede har sagt til fru Daly: spørgsmålet er blevet blokeret, og jeg har lovet mig selv at fremlægge en samling af anbefalinger for Ministerrådet, som direkte refererer sig til problemet om familieforholdene og fordelingen af ansvaret inden for familien.
In the Com mission's view the introduction of special conditions of work for women may be divided into three broad categories: first of all, unjustified provisions, secondly humanitarian provisions and thirdly measures relating to women's health and safety.
Men jeg skal på ny slå fast — for det er et budskab, jeg ønsker skal være helt klart for Parlamentet — at Kommissionen ikke gennem retsmidler vil påtvinge de europæiske borgere hvilken form for familieordning, de skal leve efter.
Of these three categories of problems which we are experiencing with the Member States the most pressing is without doubt that of unjustified legal provisions.
(Mødet afbrudt kl. 16.50 og genoptaget kl. 17.00)
(The sitting was suspended at 4.50p.m. and resumed at 5 p.m.)
A2-287/87) af Hitzigrath for Ud valget om Eksterne Økonomiske Forbindelser om ind gåelse af den fjerde tillægsprotokol til aftalen mellem Det Europæiske Økonomiske Fællesskab og Israel (Rådet: 5813/87 - C2-259/87)
A 2-287/87) by Mr Hitzigrath, on behalf of the Committee on External Economic Relations, on the conclusion of the fourth additional protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Com munity and the State of Israel (Council: 5813/87 — C 2-259/87)
Formanden. — Hr. Cervettis forslag er mere vidt gående.
It is an extremely complex question.
Jeg vil derfor i første omgang spørge ham, om han er indforstået med forslaget af hr. Klepsch, eller om han fastholder sit forslag.
I say that because it is part of the programme at present in force on equality of oppor tunity between men and women, which we must finally analyse and evaluate in 1990.
A2-286/87) af Hitzigrath for Ud valget om Eksterne Økonomiske Forbindelser om
A 2-285/87) by Mr Hitzigrath, on behalf of the Committee on External Economic Relations, on the conclusion of the protocol on financial cooperation between the European Economic Community and the State of Israel (Council: 8426/87 — C 2-259/87)
Cervetti (COM). - (IT) Hr. formand, jeg fastholder min anmodning om henvisningen, blandt andet på grund af en artikel i Forretningsordenen.
Finally as regards maternity the Commission is preparing certain guidelines on the protection of women during pregnancy and we shall endeavour to draw up a code of practice on the subject.
På den anden side, selv om jeg fornemmer meningen med hr. Klepschs forslag, så kan jeg ikke se, hvorledes den proceduremæssigt kan forsvares.
I therefore feel we should decide now, as Mrs Veil and others requested on Monday afternoon.
Hänsch (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, vi stillede i man dags det forslag, at Parlamentet henviser betænkningerne af Hitzigrath om Israel til fornyet udvalgsbehandling, fordi nogle spørgsmål endnu ikke er klar lagt.
CERVETTI (COM). — (IT) Mr President, pursuant to Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure, I ask for the protocols with Israel to be referred back to committee.
Formanden. — Jeg vil kun understrege, at forslaget er lovligt.
PRESIDENT. — I should just like to point out that the request is admissible.
I henhold til artikel 103, stk. 5, ville det kun have været ulovligt, hvis det var blevet stillet under forhandlingen og derpå var blevet forkastet.
It would only have been inadmissible under Rule 103(5) if it had been during the debate and then rejected.
Det blev imidlertid stillet i forbindelse med fastsættelsen af arbejdsplanen og er dermed lovligt.
It was however made when the order of business was being established and is thus admissible.
(Forslaget om fornyet udvalgsbehandling vedtoges)
(Parliament rejected the request for referral back to com mittee)
Hvis vi skulle stemme for, ville det af de direkte berørte blive opfattet som en solidaritetshandling — lille eller stor — ikke blot med staten Israel, men med dens nuværende ledelse og dens politik.
Moreover, considering that Commissioner Cheysson will be able to reply on this question in the Chamber tomorrow — if I am not mistaken — it would be somewhat strange for us to vote on these protocols today.
Hvis vi stemmer imod, vil ingen kunne sige, at det har været en støtte: men man vil naturligvis kunne sige det modsatte.
Finally, I will not conceal the fact that this request for a referral has also some political significance, but it will never be as serious and full of consequences as a vote on the content of the protocols themselves.
(Forslaget om udsættelse af afstemningen forkaste des)
(Parliament rejected the proposal for the vote to be deferred)
Stillet over for dette alternativ kan vi ikke være i tvivl, bortset fra enhver partsinteresse.
KLEPSCH (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, in the interim we have heard that the Commission is unable to answer the questions raised in the House.
Det er klart at den negative stemme vil blive betragtet som en kritik eller i det mindste som en afstandstagen fra magtpolitik, men det vil også være en opfordring, en opmuntring til dem, som i dag, først og fremmest i Israel, mener, at staten Israel bør ændre politik.
I have made a further attempt to obtain some more information about this from the President of the Commission, Mr Delors.
Arndt (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg beklager, det er gået således, for Den Socialistiske Gruppe har fra starten gjort opmærksom på, hvorledes det vil se ud.
ARNDT (S). — (DE) Mr President, I am sorry this has happened, because the Socialist Group has pointed out from the outset what the outcome would be.
Andre grupper har bebrejdet os, at vi ville krybe uden om afgørelsen.
Other groups have accused us of wanting to avoid taking a decision.
Det vil vi ikke på nogen måde!
That is absolutely untrue.
Min gruppe er for øjeblikket for det store flertals vedkommende ikke, jeg vil snarere sige endnu ikke i stand til at stemme for den første protokol, altså protokollen om de økonomiske forbindelser med de besatte om råder.
A large majority of my group is unable or, I would rather say, not yet able to vote for the first protocol, the protocol on economic relations with the occupied territories.
Vi hører til dem: vi stemmer derfor imod og vi opfordrer dem, der har den samme vilje og de samme følelser, til at følge os.
In these circumstances, I would appreciate it if the vote could be held over until the Commission has made its statement to us.
Vi er ikke i stand dertil, fordi Kommissionens oplys ning om, hvorledes varerne behandles, ikke er klar lagt.
We are unable to vote for it because the information the Commission has provided on how the goods are treated is unclear.
Der forekom her i går en kontrovers med hr. Blumenfeld, og jeg har endnu en gang undersøgt den erklæring, kommissæren gav os, og det viste sig, at det på ingen måde er klarlagt.
There was a dispute with Mr Blumenfeld here yesterday, and I took another look at the Commission's statement, and it turns out to be far from clear.
Veil (LDR). — (FR) Hr. formand, siden december måned har vi haft dette spørgsmål om protokollerne og deres ratificering til behandling, som vi for øvrigt tidligere havde de protokoller, der vedrørte Tyrkiet, til behandling.
CERVETTI (COM). — (IT) Mr President, I insist on my motion which refers, amongst other things, to one of the Rules of Procedure.
Jeg mener, der er to forskellige problemer: procedureproblemerne og de grundlæggende problemer.
This concerns the extension of existing economic relations between the 10 Member States of the European Community and Israel to include the two new Member States.
Vi er således ikke i stand til nu at stemme for den første protokol.
The Socialist Group was then accused of wanting to avoid taking a decision although things are ready for a decision.
Det forholder sig anderledes med den anden protokol.
The majority of the House then said that the decision must be taken this week because everything is
Her er der tale om at udvide de alle rede eksisterende økonomiske forbindelser mellem de ti medlemsstater i Det Europæiske Fællesskab til også at omfatte de to nye.
On the other hand, as things now stand, we are similarly unable to vote for the third protocol, the financial protocol, because we might possibly find ourselves in the situation — I am not saying this is bound to be the case — of being accused of endorsing the Israeli
Den 24. november blev der indgået en aftale, der blev bekræftet skriftligt den 7. december.
That is why we requested the referral of these protocols back to the committee, but unfortunately this request was turned down on Mon day.
Det er udelukkende på basis heraf, at Rådet har fremsendt de tre protokoller til Parlamentet.
The majority of my group — the exception being the French delegation — will not be voting for the first protocol.
Man kunne være af den opfattelse, at det i en mødeperiode måske kunne være ønskeligt at vente for at se, om situationen ville afklares, for at få yder ligere oplysninger.
CERVETTI (COM). — (IT) Mr President, we wanted to avoid this vote but, since it is to take place, we cannot ignore its political significance.
Kommissæren er ikke til stede og har ikke ment, at de elementer, han kunne give os, havde stor nok betydning til at retfærdiggøre hans tilstedeværelse.
The Commissioner is not here, he has concluded that the information he was in a position to give us was not important enough to justify his presence.
Vi har ingen grund til ikke at udtale os, for det drejer sig om et principspørgsmål.
There is no reason for us not to take a vote, for a matter of principle is involved here.
Faktisk anmoder Rådet os om at udtale os, og vi kan ikke i det uendelige vige uden om en beslutning, der på det diplomatiske plan bringer både Rådet og Kommissionen i vanskeligheder, som jeg tidligere har sagt.
The Council is asking us to vote and we cannot indefinitely put off a decision on an issue which, as I have said, is putting both the Council and the Commission in a difficult position from the diplomatic viewpoint.
Man vil så sige, at Parlamentet ikke opfylder sin funktion.
That would invite the charge that Parliament was not doing its job.
Parlamentet skal altså udtale sig, det er dens pligt, den har beføjelsen til det.
So it must take a vote, it has a duty to vote and is competent to do so.
Det kan udmærket udtale sig i den ret ning, det ønsker, men det bør udtale sig.
It is perfectly free to vote whichever way it wishes, but vote it must.
Hvad angår det grundlæggende, hr. formand, så har vi i morgen en uopsættelig forhandling om situation en i Gaza.
As far as the substantive issues are concerned, Mr President, we are holding an urgent debate tomorrow on the situation in Gaza.
Det er ved den lejlighed, vi skal diskutere situationen og alle sammen give udtryk for vore me ninger om denne situation.
That will be the time for us to debate the situation, when we will have the opportunity to state our various views.
Vi ved, at nogle for dømmer den fuldstændigt — jeg vil ikke gå i detaljer — men også, at vi alle er foruroligede over situation en, og at vi alle ønsker at gribe ind på en sådan måde, at situationen kan genoprettes; vi ved udmærket, at vold fører til undertrykkelse, at undertrykkelse udgør en farlig klemme, og at Israels venner er foruroligede, som hr. Cervetti har sagt det.
We know that some of us utterly condemn the situation — I do not want to go into details — but also that all of us are concerned about it want to make sure that it is put right, because we are all too aware that violence leads to repression, that repression is a slippery slope, and that, as Mr Cervetti said, Israel's friends are worried.
Jeg deler måske ikke alle hr. Cervettis synspunkter, men jeg vil mene, at vi alle er bekymrede, og at vi ønsker at fremme en dialog mellem alle parter og at fremme en fredsproces.
I may not agree with all Mr Cervetti's views, but I would say that we are all worried and are anxious to help organize talks among all parties and to set up a peace process.
Jeg er lige vendt hjem fra de besatte områder, og jeg hverken kan eller vil stemme mod min samvittighed, og jeg kan ikke stemme for disse protokoller af to grunde.
Of course, a vote against will be seen as a criticism of a policy of force, or at least an aloofness from such a policy, but it will also be an invitation, an encouragement, to those who today, in the first place in Israel, consider that the Israeli State must change its policy.
Den ene har at gøre med selve protokollernes art. Så længe Israel ikke har institutionaliseret frem gangsmåden og midlerne, der skal sikre de palæstinensiske producenter muligheden for at handle med Europa frit og uden mellemmænd, vil der foreligge en form for tyveri af varer og tjenesteydelser.
Today, above all, Israel's friends are not those who are urging it forward along the road of obstinacy and pol itical blindness; instead, they are those who are doing the opposite, on behalf of the legitimate rights of the people in that area — both Israeli and Palestinian — before it is too late.
Men jeg vil vende tilbage til spørgsmålet om protokollerne.
To return to the matter of the protocols.
Vi ved udmærket, at ofte ønsker alle slags lande at etablere handelsforbindelser med os, og at vi må påtage os økonomiske og handelsmæssige forbindelser med dem.
We know very well that it is a very common occurrence for countries of all kinds to seek to enter into trade relations with us, and we establish economic and commercial relations with them.
Vi påtog os i forbindelse med ud videlsen visse forpligtelser over for tredjelande. Disse protokoller er konsekvensen af dette.
At the time of enlargement, we entered into commitments with third countries.
Der er altså ikke nogen grund til ikke at vedtage dem.
There is therefore no reason not to adopt them.
På grund af disse forpligtelser skal vi i morgen have en forhand ling om den politiske situation i Israel.
Because of these commitments, we are holding a debate tomorrow on the political situation in Israel.
Det er grunden til at min gruppe vil stemme for protokollerne, og grunden til, at vi anså det for bydende nødvendigt at have en politisk holdning til disse protokoller, uanset hviken.
That is why my group considers it essential to have a political position, one way or the other, on these protocols, and will be voting in favour of them.
Den anden grund, der byder mig at have denne hold ning, er, må jeg indrømme, af humanitær og politisk art. Som alle de observatører, der har været på stedet — og som for øvrigt mange israelere, må jeg under strege — vender jeg hjem forfærdet over de brækkede lemmers politik.
Now it is my belief that there are two different prob lems here, the procedural problem and the substantive problem, and there is nothing to be gained, as I said on Monday, from confusing the two and using procedural considerations as a pretext for not voting on the substance, one way or the other.
Price (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg og min gruppe vil stemme imod alle tre protokoller.
PRICE (ED). — Mr President, I shall vote with my group against all three protocols.
Det gør jeg af handelsmæssige grunde.
I do so on trade grounds.
I 1986 vedtog Rådet en for ordning, der tillod import af varer fra Vestbredden og
In 1986 the Council adopted a regulation permitting the entry of goods from the West Bank and Gaza.
For 21 år siden sagde general de Gaulle: »Hvor der er besættelse, vil der være modstand, vil der være undertrykkelse«.
The Government of Israel prevaricated in the implementation of this regulation from 1986 to late 1987.
Israelerne er i dag involveret i en djævelsk proces.
On 24 November an agreement was negotiated and was con firmed in writing on 7 December.
Min stemmeafgivelse i dag er udtryk for modstand mod den politik, der føres i dag.
TELKÄMPER (ARC). — (DE) Mr President, we too are dissatisfied with the procedure.
Den er ikke vendt mod Israel, så længe Israel forbliver tro over for sine humanistiske og demokratiske værdier. (Kraftigt bifald) den 27. oktober 1986, vedrørende præferencestillingen for import til Fællesskabet af varer, der stammer fra de besatte områder.
In a situation in which people in the occupied territories are being killed by the Israeli military every day and Palestinians are being murdered we cannot simply present what appears to be a financial and administrative solution.
Telkämper (ARC). — (DE) Hr. formand, heller ikke vi er tilfredse med fremgangsmåden.
It has since become absolutely clear that the Israeli authorities have violated the agreement in res pect of industrial goods and have not permitted the import of agricultural goods at all.
I en situation, hvor der dagligt er døde på grund af det israelske militær i de besatte områder, og hvor palæstinensere myrdes, kan vi ikke bare fremlægge en tilsyneladende finansteknisk og administrativ løsning.
The Commission delivered two notes verbales to the Israeli Government early in February and I have confirmed with the Com mission today that not one single direct commercial export of agricultural goods from the occupied territories has taken place since October 1986 when the Community permitted them.
Nordmann (LDR). — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg oplever i dag noget forholdsvis sjældent : jeg er i det væsentlige enig med hr. Såby.
If the Parliament were today to approve these proto cols, it would lose all chance of securing the proper implementation of this agreement.
En globalisering, forvirring og sammenblanding er aldrig udtryk for klogskab, men kommissær Varfis meddelte os i går, at de protokol ler, der i dag er forelagt Parlamentet, ikke omhandler eksporten fra de besatte områder, der hører under helt andre fællesskabsbestemmelser.
It would grant valuable trade concessions to a country which is at the moment in violation of an existing agreement. In view of that, we should not approve the protocols unless and until that agreement is working in practice.
Enhver positiv afstemning for hver enkelt af disse tre protokoller ville af Israel blive opfattet som et tegn til at gå videre med sin politik på samme måde som i de sidste uger.
Any vote for any of these three protocols would be seen by Israel as a signal that it should continue with the policy it has adopted in recent weeks.
Det er for os en grund til at forkaste pro tokollerne.
We see that as a reason for rejecting the protocols.
Når jeg ser på, hvorledes Israel hidtil har håndteret disse protokoller, konstaterer jeg, at den palæstinensiske befolknings landbrugsvarer kun kan afskibes til EF via Israel, dvs. at licensen gives af Israel.
When I con sider the way Israel has so far applied these protocols, I find that agricultural goods produced by the Palestinian population can only be shipped to the Com munity though Israel. In other words, the licences are granted by Israel.
Men vi vil jo også have direkte forbindelser og ønsker, at der gennem fredsprocessen kommer en dialog i stand mellem de involverede parter, dvs. mellem Israel og palæstinenserne.
But we want direct relations and hope that the peace process will result in a dialogue between the parties concerned, that is, between Israel and the Palestinians.
Vi bør af fredspolitiske grunde ikke gribe ind i denne mulige dialog, som for tiden afvises af Israel, med en positiv afstemning.
On peace policy grounds we should not intervene in this possible dialogue, which is currently rejected by Israel, by voting for the protocols.
Af den grund vil vor gruppe for kaste alle tre protokoller.
My group will therefore be voting against all three protocols.
Såby (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, da jeg i januar-mødeperioden udtalte mig på Den Socialistiske Gruppes vegne, meddelte jeg, at vi stærkt fordømte den israel ske regerings politik over for de besatte områder.
SABY (S). — (FR) Mr President, speaking during the January partsession on behalf of the Socialist Group, I said that we roundly condemned the Israeli Govern ment's policy on the occupied territories.
Jeg tilføjede, at vi ville stemme for protokollerne.
I added that we would be voting in favour of the protocols.
I dag har vi imidlertid den selvsamme indstilling, og de franske socialister vil stemme for de tre protokoller, men det betyder på ingen måde, at vi godkender den israelske regerings politik og mener, at den skal have frit spil.
Our position is unchanged today, and the French Socialists will be voting for the three protocols, but that in no sense implies that we endorse or approve of the Israeli Government's policy.
Rogalla (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne endnu en gang takke kollegerne hjerteligt for den tålmodighed, hvormed de har lyttet til disse stemmeforklaringer.
The first is to do with the very nature of the protocols. Until such time as Israel has institutionalized procedures and arrangements ensuring that Palestinian producers are able to trade freely and directly with Europe, a kind of deflection of trade in goods and services is going to persist.