natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvad angår forhandlingen under ét (nr. 127-129 i for slaget til dagsorden) om republikkerne i det tidligere Sovjetunionen, peger jeg på, at der ved fodnote til Chabert-betænkningen (nr. 128 i forslaget til dagsorden) indgår følgende mundtlige forespørgsler om TACIS-forordningen:
As far as the joint debate on the republics of the former Soviet Union is concerned, I would point out that the following oral questions on the TACIS programme:
B3-503/93 fra Energi, Forsknings- og Teknologiudvalget til Kommissionen,
B3-503/93 from the Committee on Energy. Research and Technology, to the Commission,
B3-496/93 fra Udvalget om Miljø- og Sund hedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse til Kom missionen og dok.
B3-496/93 from the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, to the Commission and Doc.
B3-497/93 til Rådet,
B3-497/93 to the Council,
B3-498/93 fra Budgetkontroludvalget til Kom missionen.
B3-498/93 from the Committee on Budgetary Control, to the Commission will be taken as a footnote to the report by Mr Chabert.
I overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i artikel 71, stk. 2, i forretningsordenen, meddeler jeg Dem, at der til Langer-betænkningen er stillet mere end 20 ændringsforslag, der ikke stammer fra det korresponderende udvalg (i alt 35 ændringsforslag fra forskellige forslagsstillere).
OOMEN-RUIJTEN (PPE). — (NE) Mr President, we think it is a great pity that the Council itself cannot come and make a statement, but I have another question which concerns the debate on relations with Central and Eastern Europe. Some time ago we had a hearing on the matter and now we have to agree a joint resolution.
DE VRIES (LDR). — (NL) Hr. formand, for så vidt angår den endelige afstemning om De Vries-betænkningen om beslutningsprocedurerne vedrørende samhandlen, er jeg af den opfattelse, at den endelige afstemning endnu ikke kan finde sted i denne uge.
DE VRIES (LDR). — (NE) Mr President, with regard to the final vote on the De Vries report concerning the decision-making procedures on trade, I do not think it will not be possible for the final vote to take place this week. But there is every possibility that we shall be able to vote on it at the next part-session, in June.
Efter al sandsynlighed kan det
Perhaps you will have had some information from the Commission by then.
For ændringer af tirsdagens dagsorden: se protokollen.
Further changes to Tuesday's agenda: see Minutes For further changes to Wednesday's agenda: see Minutes
Jeg foreslår alligevel, at betænkningen bliver stående på dagsordenen. (')
PRESIDENT in the text of the motion for a resolution a cross-reference to that document.
Jeg fremsætter dette ud fra vore reglers synsvinkel måske noget kætterske forslag. Jeg ser, at hr. Schmidt er en smule urolig over denne sag, men hvis det kunne medføre, at vi ikke tyngede beslutningen, ville jeg med stor glæde tilslutte mig denne løsning.
Does this mean that the law of the strongest and most cynical, the policy of massacres, rapes and ethnic cleansing is now validated?
Vi har for nogen tid siden afholdt en høring derom, og nu skal der komme et fælles beslutningsforslag.
Can the European Parliament afford to be silent at a time like this?
FORMANDEN. — Det står enhver gruppe frit for inden for fristen at fremsætte et beslutningsforslag om sagen.
This is why we are asking you, Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, for a real debate and resolutions on this matter.
Jeg har forstået, at der politisk set ikke er nogen uenighed derom her i Parlamentet, men det vinder i styrke, hvis Parlamentet også officielt kunne fastslå resultaterne.
I have two things to say to that: firstly, it is not a Commission statement but an EPC statement we are discussing.
FORMANDEN. — Fru Oomen-Ruijten, må jeg tillade mig et lille forslag? Det ville da være enkelt at føje et punkt til beslutningsforslagets tekst, hvor der henvises til dette dokument.
Formally, of course, motions for resolutions can be tabled.
SIMEONI (ARC). — (FR) Hr. formand, hvis vi har forstået det rigtigt, vil Kommissionen afgive en redegørelse om Bosnien på onsdag, men uden mulighed for Parlamentet for at fremsætte beslutninger og uden ekstra taletid end den, der er påregnet.
CATHERWOOD, Sir Fred (PPE). — Mr President, I am the rapporteur for that hearing.
Imidlertid hindrer et politisk vigtigt nyt faktum, at vi i total ansvarsløshed kan komme uden om Bosnien-problemet: fem medlemmer af Sikker hedsrådet har netop stadfæstet de serbiske territoriale erobringer, og Vance-Owen-planen er bortfaldet.
We had the agreement of the President-in-Office, who said he would make a separate statement on the CIS when he came here so that we could put in a wind-up resolution.
Netop i dag har Bosniens præsident straks afvist dette, i vendinger der direkte berører os.
We have put in a wind-up resolution which includes in the recitals the reasons for our resolution.
Han har tilkendegivet sin store skuffelse over Europa.
If we do not have the reasons and the recitals in, what we recommend will have absolutely no weight at all.
Den stærkeres, den mest kyniskes lov, massakrepolitikken, voldtægterne, den etniske udrensning er altså blevet stadfæstet? Det spørgsmål kan rejse sig.
We need to express a coherent position from this Parliament as a result of the hearing which certainly demonstrated that we were going to have enormous trouble in Eastern Europe unless the Member States and the United States change their position at once.
Hvor latterligt ser ikke det permanente korstog for menneskerettighederne ud, som vi er så indbildske at føre her.
The Parliament ought to be able to express itself following the hearing.
Under alle omstændigheder kan vor gruppe ikke acceptere det.
So all we are asking you is to maintain the position we agreed with the President-in-Office.
Vi forlanger derfor, hr. formand, vi forlanger derfor, kære kolleger, en reel debat og beslutninger.
We can then put in a wind-up resolution and this will be separate from those that were left over from last time.
Hertil må jeg sige to ting til Dem: For det første er det ikke nogen redegørelse fra Kommissionen, men en redegørelse fra Det Europæiske Politiske Samarbejde vi skal diskutere.
Ten days ago the European Parliament sent a delegation to Sarajevo and expressed our support and solidarity with the parliament of Bosnia-Hercegovina; our group simply cannot accept that all of a sudden we should fall silent either for fear of the same situation arising as last time or because we do not really know what we want to say.
Sir Fred CATHERWOOD (PPE). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er ordfører om denne høring.
PRESIDENT. — I have made what I thought was a procedurally very simple proposal: we could have a reference in the text of the motion for a resolution to the final report of the hearing expressing our support.
Det var en høring, der blev gennemført af fire udvalg og en delegation fra SNG. Vi har gjort os stor umage med beslutningen.
I think it would be very difficult to add five or six pages of text on which a vote had to be taken.
Vi havde en aftale med rådsformanden, der sagde, at han ville komme med en særskilt redegørelse om SNG, når han kom her, så vi kunne fremsætte et beslutningsforslag som afslutning på forhandlingen.
For this reason the Green Group in the European Parliament cannot accept such an agreement and we will do everything we can, together with other groups, particularly those who spoke on behalf of this Parliament in Sarajevo, to agree on a text which we can accept.
Vi har fremsat et sådant beslutningsforslag, der under henvisningerne anfører begrundelserne for vor beslutning.
Otherwise it would be a disgrace and we could not ask for any greater say by this Parliament in foreign and security matters if on the first really important occasion we were too scared to express our opinion or even hold one.
Det er nødvendigt, at vi indføjer en sammenhængende stillingtagen fra Parlamentet som et resultat af høringen, der absolut viste, at vi vil få kolossale vanskeligheder i Østeuropa, hvis ikke med lemsstaterne og De Forenede Stater straks ændrer deres indstilling.
COT (PSE). — (FR) Mr President, my opinion is that we should take up the concerns of Sir Fred Catherwood given the importance of the hearing and of the conclusions submitted.
Parlamentet bør være i stand til at udtrykke sig efter høringen. Alt, hvad man ifølge artikel 54, stk. 4, behøver, er, at De tillader fremsættelse af en særskilt beslutning, så vi ikke oversvømmes med de beslutninger, der blev tilovers fra sidste mødeperiode.
If you could find a way of annexing these conclusions to the resolution, this may be a way round the problem, since the resolution would appear in the minutes with a paragraph referring to them, and be annexed to the main resolution put to the vote.
Det eneste, vi anmoder om, er derfor, at De fastholder den indstilling, vi aftalte med rådsformanden.
Perhaps I am making a rather heretical proposal vis-a-vis our rules.
Vi kan så fremsætte et beslutningsforslag som afslutning på forhandlingen, og det vil være særskilt i forhold til dem, der blev tilbage sidste gang.
I see that Mr Schmidt is somewhat worried about this, but if it prevented our resolution becoming too unwieldy, I would be happy to go along with this solution.
For det andet hører jeg fra Dem, at De har hørt om gruppeformændenes aftale om ikke at fremsætte noget beslutningsforslag.
PRESIDENT. — Now that the chairman of the European Social Democratic Party has agreed to this procedure I would suggest that the groups agree on a formula so that the valuable findings and final report of the hearings are incorporated.
Formelt kan der naturligvis fremsættes beslutningsforslag.
COT (PSE). — (FR) Mr President, I entirely agree with you.
Det er klart, det siger vor forret ningsorden.
It is certainly not a question of depriving any group of the right to table resolutions.
Man havde ikke pålagt mig at foreslå Dem et forbud mod at fremsætte beslutningsforslag.
This is why my group would be against the motion asking for an early vote on a resolution.
FORMANDEN. — Jeg har dog stillet Dem et efter min mening forretningsordensmæssigt helt enkelt forslag: at man i beslutningsforslagets tekst nævner den afsluttende beretning fra høringen — og giver tilslutning til den. Jeg er nemlig bange for, at det vil blive meget vanskeligt at tilføje en tekst på en fem-seks sider, som der så skal stemmes om.
PRESIDENT. — Ladies and gentlemen, all we have done is put the EPC report on this subject on Wednesday's agenda.
LANGER (V). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg vil slå på samme tromme som min forgænger, hr. Simeoni.
SIMEONI (ARC). — (FR) Mr President, if we have understood correctly, the Commission will be making a statement on Bosnia on Wednesday, but without Parliament being able to table any resolutions or having any extra speaking time above what is already scheduled.
For yderligere ændringer af onsdagens dagsorden: se protokollen.
But what do we see? We see that the Council is divided on this issue, that the European Parliament is divided on the issue and
I betragtning af, hvad der foregår dér, kan vi ikke blive ved at tie.
TINDEMANS that we do not want to take the risk of the scandal of the previous debate on Bosnia-Hercegovina repeating itself.
Derfor kan De Grønne i Europa-Parlamentet ikke føle sig bundet af en sådan aftale, og vi vil sætte alt ind på i samarbejde med grupperne — især dem der på vort Parlaments vegne var i Sarajevo — at få opstillet en tekst, som vi kan vedtage.
Consequently, at this point in time, I can go along with Mr Cot — wait for a while, and after mature consideration we can no doubt adopt a very good resolution. Even so we should act as quickly as possible.
FORMANDEN. — Jeg gentager, at det er en sag for forsamlingen og for Dem.
The report by Mr Elliott on higher education in the Community does not comply with the decisions of the Enlarged Bureau of 22 April and 19 May 1993 on the length of text.
Jeg beskærer ikke Deres rettigheder.
It has therefore been removed from the draft agenda.
GALLAND (LDR). — (FR) Hr. formand, ingen her i salen kan anfægte det, hr. Langer og hr. Simeoni netop har sagt.
PRESIDENT. — There is no point in discussing any further a matter which is entirely in your hands.
Det værste er det, vi gjorde i sidste mødeperiode.
Nevertheless every individual has the right to table a motion.
BEUMER (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg vil ikke tale om dette punkt, hvad det angår, bakker jeg min gruppe formand op.
ELLIOTT (PSE). — Mr President, as you said, this involves a matter of principle.
For en ordens skyld, jeg har lige checket det; jeg har ikke skrevet noget brev på Økonomiudvalgets vegne for at få Pierros-betænkningen opført uden for handling.
Obviously other reports in the future could be affected in the same way that mine has been.
Vil De venligst checke det?
Mine is one of the first to be affected by this new ruling.
Og hvis det ikke forholder sig sådan, vil De så sørge for, at der bliver tid til, at ordføreren kan give udtryk for sin mening på Økonomiudvalgets vegne.
It is a perhaps a pity that we were not a little tougher in the past when reports with resolutions running to ten or twenty pages went through Parliament.
COT (PSE). — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg for mit vedkommende er helt enig med Dem.
SIMEONI (ARC). — (FR) I would like to go back to the argument used by Mr Cot who says the situation is constantly changing.
Der er på ingen måde tale om at fratage nogen gruppe nogen som helst ret til at foreslå beslutninger.
Of course it is, but what role has the Parliament played?
Det er derfor, min gruppe ikke går ind for at imødekomme anmodningen om afstemning om en beslutning snarest muligt.
My own feeling is that democracy should have the courage to air the breadth of its opinions and to openly recognize its deficiencies and limitations.
Det er man allerede i gang med at
Let us not shirk our responsibilities.
FORMANDEN. — Mine damer og herrer, vi har kun sat redegørelsen fra EPS om denne sag på onsdagens dags orden.
Quite honestly, I do not think that it is right that we should treat every resolution in the same way.
Om denne redegørelse fra EPS vil der — som vedtaget — finde en forhandling sted, og det overlades til enhver gruppe og ethvert medlem af forsamlingen at fremsætte forslag til dette i overensstemmelse med for retningsordenen.
You cannot really say that a report concerned only with a small aspect of one part of a Community programme somewhere should be treated in the same way as a report that encompasses a very wide-ranging aspect of policy.
I stedet for denne betænkning indsættes forhandlingen underet om betænkningerne af hr. Hindley og fru Reding om Taiwan og GATT, der oprindelig var sat på fredagens dagsorden.
The report I am involved with concerns the whole future of higher education in Europe and is a response to a very large and extensive Commission memorandum.
Elliott-betænkningen om de højere uddannelser i Fælles skabet svarer ikke til Det Udvidede Præsidiums beslutninger af 22. april og 19. maj 1993 om teksters længde.
Nevertheless, des pite my reluctance at having to omit so many worthwhile things, I did in fact ensure that when this report went to committee for voting it met the requirement of two pages maximum.
Den skal derfor tages af forslaget til dagsorden. Det drejer sig her om et principielt spørgsmål, som jeg derfor vil forelægge for Forretningsordensudvalget.
But what happened, as you have said, Mr President, was that the committee in its wisdom voted a series of amendments that increased the length of the report by quite a considerable amount.
TINDEMANS (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, hvad angår sagens kerne, har hr. Langer ret.
GALLAND (LDR). — (FR) Mr President, nobody in the House would query what has just been said by Mr Langer and Mr Simeoni.
Men hvad fastslår vi?
What we did at the last partsession was the worst.
At Rådet er uenigt om denne sag, at Europa-Parlamentet er uenigt om denne sag, og vi vil ikke risikere, at skændslen fra den sidste forhandling om Bosnien-Hercegovina skulle gentage sig.
We could start all over again, but we could also have a responsible discussion on it during this partsession and then another month of reflection before reaching a compromise resolution.
Som følge deraf kan jeg nu i dette øjeblik tilslutte mig hr. Cot, vent lidt, måske kan vi, når vi er modne til det, vedtage et meget godt beslutningsforslag, men så skal det være hurtigst muligt.
But I have heard no difference of opinion and I think, Mr Simeoni, that it is our democratic responsibility to ensure we do not have a re-run of last month because bringing democracy into disrepute is the worst thing that could happen to us.
FORMANDEN. — Det tjener intet formål at fortsætte at drøfte en sag, der ligger i Deres egne hænder.
BEUMER (PPE). — (NE) Mr President, I do not wish to address the matter under discussion; in that regard, I defer to my group chairman.
Gruppeformændene anså det i formiddags ikke for fornuftigt at regne med et beslutningsforslag om denne sag på onsdag.
To set the record straight, I have checked: I did not write a letteron behalf of the Economic Affairs Committee to get the Pierrôs report passed without a debate.
Det står enhver frit for at fremsætte et forslag.
Will you please verify that?
ELLIOTT (PSE). — (EN) Hr. formand, som De sagde, ligger der heri et principielt spørgsmål.
I do not know quite what I am supposed to do now — or what anybody is supposed to do.
Helt ærligt mener jeg ikke, det er rigtigt at behandle alle beslutninger på samme måde.
We may be saving some time in plenary by having shorter motions for resolutions.
Man kan faktisk ikke sige, at en betænkning, der kun drejer sig om en lille side af en del af et fællesskabsprogram, skal behandles på samme måde som en betænkning, der omfatter et meget vidtfavnende politisk aspekt.
But if reports are going to be continually referred back to committee when they have already been voted once, they will have to be voted on all over again, and that would add to the work of the committees.
SIMEONI (ARC). — (FR) Jeg vil gerne vende tilbage til hr. Cots argument, når han siger, at situationen udvikler sig.
I do not actually have any major problem about this report being deferred until June because the urgency has now ceased.
Naturligvis udvikler den sig, men hvilken rolle har Parlamentet spillet?
I understand the Commission is probably not in a position to do that now until October.
Kan det ikke komme med en tilkendegivelse om denne udvikling eller i det mindste om de veje, det ønsker at se åbne sig for en løsning af dette problem?
So it will be quite sufficient that we vote this next month. But I hope that the Rules Committee can sort this matter out and come up with a sensible and practical answer.
Taler nummer to har for sit vedkommende præciseret, at det drejede sig om at demonstrere Parlamentets manglende beslutsomhed.
PRESIDENT. — I would remind you that the report by Mrs Cassanmagnago Cerretti has been brought forward to Monday.
Den gengiver de indtryk, vi har fået, og hvis vi regner subsidiaritet for noget — og vi har jo dette ord på tungen fra morgen til aften — så skal vi også lade denne betænkning passere.
COIMBRA MARTINS (PSE). — (PT) I wanted to say something on the Elliott report.
Her kommer nemlig på fremragende måde vort krav til udtryk, at man ikke skal overlade rettigheder til Kommissionen, som landene og regionerne har og også skal beholde.
I think we are setting a very dangerous precedent with such a measure because opponents of a given rapporteur could simply, at commit­tee stage, get innocuous and consensual amendments adopted and thus, if they wanted to, torpedo the report.
Vi har bestræbt os for at ændre hr. Elliotts betænkning i udvalgsflertallets ånd. At den derved kunne blive længere eller kortere, ligger i sagens natur.
I think this is a very dangerous precedent.
I dette tilfælde er den blevet længere, men jeg mener ikke, man kan give udvalget forskrift om, fordi betænkningen ikke må blive længere, værsgo at holde igen og ikke fremføre sine gode forslag og ændringsforslag!
LANE (RDE). — Mr President, in view of the fact that the Hindley and Reding reports are being brought forward to Thursday and that both relate to GATT difficulties, and since I assume that Commissioner Sir Leon Brittan will be in the House for that debate, could he be asked to make a general statement as to where GATT is in all its aspects at the moment.
Man kan i grunden kun forlange af hr. Elliott, at det, han forelægger, skal svare til de underlige regler, vi har opstillet, men hvad udvalget derefter laver, ligger uden for hr. Elliotts muligheder, og det kan man ikke give ham prygl for.
Also, in view of the fact that I put in this House on several occasions during Question Time ques­tions to the Council in relation to their work on GATT and where the Blair House Agreement stands, could we ask for a representative of the Council to be present on Thursday during those debates.
Jeg tror ærlig talt, at vi kommer ind i en helt ny situation i Parlamentet, hvis vi siger, at udvalgene ikke længere har ret til at vedtage ændringsforslag, som de finder det passende.
I will finish by saying it is appropriate to have the statement on Thursday, because when we have had such debates on Fridays very few people are present.
Jeg opfatter det sådan, at det er henvist til Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet.
I would like the Commissioner responsible and a Member of the Council to be present for those debates and a general statement to be made.
Jeg ved ikke ganske, hvad man tænker sig skal ske. Jeg håber, Forretningsordensudvalget vil komme med et eller andet svar på dette problem.
It seems to me that this is a matter of principle and that the Rules Committee should scrutinize the issue.
Vi skal også passe meget på ikke at fjerne al frihed og selvstændighed for udvalgene.
Incidentally we have included the Blair House Agreement on Tuesday's agenda.
Jeg beder derfor alle, der i Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet har mulighed for at forelægge forslag, om at gøre det, for man kan ikke indføre nogen regler, der virkelig er kvælende for nogle.
PRESIDENT. — I have a request from Mr Elliott and 24 further signatories for a debate on the report by Miss Rawlings on the development of cultural cooperation between the Community and the USA which it had been intended to deal with under the procedure without debate.
Det var forudset, at Kommissionen skulle gå videre med alle de synspunkter, den havde modtaget om sit memorandum, til mødet i Rådet af Undervisningsministre i juni.
I would remind you that the Enlarged Bureau only authorized the committee to draw up a report under the procedure without debate pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of Procedure.
Jeg forstår, at Kommissionen formentlig ikke vil være i stand til at gøre det før til oktober nu.
The Enlarged Bureau confirmed this decision unanimously on 19 May.
Så det vil være helt tilstrækkeligt, at vi stemmer om det i næste måned.
We nevertheless have to vote on this proposal. (')
FORMANDEN. — Jeg har fuld forståelse for det, De siger, men vi kan ikke stemme om syv siders beslutningstekst.
PACK (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentle­men, I should like to support Mr Elliott.
De kan skrive såre meget i betænkningens begrundelse, men for beslutningsforslaget har vi fastsat en øvre grænse på to sider.
This is an own initiative report, which we did not draw up just for the fun of it but which follows on directly from the Commission memorandum.
Det er allerede meget! Men jeg takker endnu en gang hr. Elliott, for han har holdt sig til forskrifterne.
It reflects the conclusions we reached and if we are really interested in subsidiarity, as we preach from morning to night, then this report should be adopted.
Som fru Pack sagde, er han ikke ansvarlig for det, der er kommet ud af det.
It clearly sets out in an exemplary manner our demand that the Commission should not be given the rights which currently — and rightly — belong to the countries and regions.