natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det var en særlig rapport om forvaltningen af og kontrollen med ordningerne til offentlig oplagring af landbrugsprodukter.
Overall, Parliament has increased the reduction in agricultural expenditure which was proposed by the Commission in its rectifying letter.
Jeg citerer fra Revisionsrettens egen pressemeddelelse:
That is a signal of some importance to the Council.
I denne nye situation kan det klart nok ikke længere forsvares, at man anvender kæmpemæssige summer — næsten 1,2 mia ECU — til støtte til at få skummetmælk anvendt til dyrefoder.
In the field of depreciation Parliament has experienced some difficulty in arriving at very precise figures.
Kommissionen er allerede i år begyndt at nedskære støttebeløbet.
Hence, the way that has been handled is by changes in remarks.
Dette skal forstsætte næste år, og Budgetudvalgets ændringsforslag vil nedsætte støtten på dette område med det halve.
But to give a broad indication to the Com mission that very substantially greater depreciation would help to solve our agricultural problems and, more important, to ensure that our accounting is put on a firmer and more accurate basis for the future, the increases in depreciation could and should be met by further reductions in the refunds.
I slutningen af dens pressemeddelelse var dens kon klusion:
The figures which the Commission has put forward in its rectifying letter are conservative figures in the light of the current prices of agricultural products on the world market.
Under disse omstændigheder konkluderer Revisionsretten, at det er teknisk umuligt at foretage nogen som helst revision af det billede, som regnskabet for EUGFL-budgettet giver af ud gifterne til offentlig oolagring.
In respect of Title IX of the budget that is an area which has inherent importance and I believe that this year we have focused on the mechanisms relating to food aid.
Vi har meget mere at gore med hensyn til landbrugsudgifterne, og jeg håber, at de fingerpeg, som Paria-
As soon as possible we have to turn our attention from budgetary technicalities and techniques to development priorities.
Dette er et bidrag til omlægningen af Europas landbrugserhverv med henblik på i stedet for at producere produkter, som folk ikke onsker. at gøre os i stand til at sikre, at vi har en politik, som er mere miljøvenlig. Dette er et spørgsmål af en vis betydning.
That may not just involve changing the product areas we support, as the Com mittee on Development and Cooperation has suggested, so much as turning the attention from food aid to real development aid which helps people in the
Barbarella (COM). — (TT) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne gøre to bemærkninger om dette 1989-budget. en mere generel og en specielt om landbrugsspørgsmålet.
their being subjected to any subsequent constraint. With this in view we have supported the criterion that the rapporteur proposed to us and the Committee on Budgets ended up adopting — to the effect that within the margins that were permitted to us certain lines should be strengthened, which concern as a matter of priority four sectors that I think are highly important.
Med hensyn til ikke-obligatoriske udgifter har ordføreren som et af sine hovedspørgsmål taget problemer ne vedrørende retsgrundlaget op.
In the first place, contrary to what Mr Price was hop ing for, we have improved the social area, even though the effort possible with the modest sums at our disposal was minimal.
Jeg sætter dette i sammenhæng med et bedre samarbejde mellem institutionerne, som har kendetegnet drøftelserne det sidste år.
The second priority was the question of environmental problems: I think that this is the sector in which the Council made its biggest, and per haps most negative cuts — at least in our opinion.
Vi skal udvide dette samarbejde til at omfatte drøftelser om det langvarige problem, nemlig det manglende retsgrundlag.
Next we strengthened the lines relating to transport, once again in line with a policy that we had already put in hand last year; and finally, we strengthened thé lines relating to development cooperation, because this seems to us to be a fundamental point in Parliament's policy.
Generelt vil jeg sige, at også jeg, ligesom mange talere før mig, glæder mig over at kunne konstatere, at den interinstitutionelle aftale, vi har undertegnet, alt i alt indtil nu synes at virke.
And so, concluding my general observations, Mr President, I want to re-emphasize our support in the main for the work of the rapporteur, and that of the Committee on Budgets.
Med hensyn til artikel 640 er der et ændringsforslag, som blev stillet af Udvalget om Sociale Anliggender og Beskæftigelse, vedrørende den sociale dimension.
Lastly, in the area of the administrative budgets, the financial perspective encourages us to take an overall view.
Det falder min gruppe vanskeligt at støtte dette.
I draw attention to a difference in treatment.
Det sætter vi ikke spørgsmålstegn ved.
My Group cannot accept that sense of priorities.
Vi har pen ge til rådighed til undersøgelser. Jeg mener, at det pågældende ændringsforslag er unødvendigt.
We are putting down an amendment in time for the second deadline of 200 000 ECU for that latter purpose which we regard as more than adequate and I hope that compromise will be one which will meet the support of other Groups.
Med hensyn til budgettets afsnit 9 er dette et område, som traditionelt er af stor betydning, og jeg mener, at vi i år har fokuseret på mekanismerne i forbindelse med fødevarehjælp.
BARBARELLA (COM). — (IT) Mr President, I would like to raise two points regarding this 1989 budget — one of a general character, and one specifically regarding agriculture.
Dette forekommer mig uomgængeligt for, som jeg under streger, at overholde denne mere omfattende aftale, som vi har indgået.
Where, on the other hand, I disagree, is on the agricultural question.
Vort Budgetudvalg foreslår i den ne forbindelse uden overskridelse af udgiftslofterne at indføre en forhandlingsordning, der til trods herfor gør det muligt for Parlamentet også ved andenbehandlingen at holde fast ved de prioriteter, der vil fremgå af Parlamentets afstemninger på torsdag.
I think that the solution put forward in this Chamber by the Committee on Budgets is not right, and is substantially unacceptable for two reasons, one of which, Mr President, is a question of form and the other a question of content.
Det forekommer mig at være en pragmatisk og fleksibel løsning, som burde kunne finde tilslutning fra Rådets side, og som vil gøre det muligt for os at give udtryk for vore prioriteter uden al være bundet bagefter.
From the general standpoint I wanted to say that I too, like many speakers who have preceded me, am delighted at the fact that taken overall — at least, to date — the Interinstitutional Agreement that we signed is working.
På dette grundlag har vi tilsluttet os det kriterium, som ordføreren har foreslået, og som Budgetudvalget til sidst har vedtaget, altså at forøge bevillingerne på nogle budgetposter inden for den margen, vi råder over, og dette væsentligst inden for fire områder, som jeg anser for særlig vigtige.
I have to acknowledge that both the Commission and the Council — who were the two other signatories to the agreement — have so far kept to their commitments and have kept unchanged, both in the preliminary draft budget and in the draft budget itself, those large categories of expenditure that were envisaged by us as part of the great Interinstitutional Agreement that I mentioned earlier.
Frem for alt har vi gennemført forbedringer, imod hvad den ærede hr. Price ønsker, i den sociale dimension, selv om det kun er en ganske ringe indsats, vi kan gøre med de beskedne beløb, der står til rådighed.
On the formal question, I do not think it right to accept information that is information and informa tion alone.
Derefter har vi givet miljøproblemer den næste prioritet.
We have to work in accordance with budgetary procedures.
Der næst har vi forøget budgetposter vedrørende transportpolitik, hvilket ligeledes hænger sammen med den politik, som vi allerede forrige år havde indledt.
I think that we cannot — I insist — just accept items of information, even though these may come from a source such as the Commission.
Endelig har vi forøget bevillingerne til udviklingsbistand, hvilket synes os at være et grundlæggende led i Parlamentets politik.
I think we must follow the rules, which are that we must await the rectifying letter that will reach us in the form drawn up by the Council.
Afslutningsvis opfordrer det finansielle overslag os til på de administrative budgetters område at anlægge en helhedsbetragtning.
I think this is an extremely important point where procedure in concerned, and that any failure to respect the rules — even though this new explanation put forward to us by the Commission has some validity — is not right.
Jeg gør opmærksom på en for skelsbehandling.
So much, then, for the formal question.
Men hensyn til Domstolens budget har Budgetudvalget nægtet at acceptere alt det personale, som Domstolen har bedt om, og som Retsudvalget støtter.
On the question of content, however, I think that we certainly cannot go into the detailed sharing out of the savings that the Commission is outlining to us because — behind the Commission's cuts as well as behind the counter-proposals for increases in some lines, or the very increases that the Committee on Budgets pro poses with regard, for example, to income aids — we are getting involved in a Community agricultural policy mechanism that I do not think we can possibly tackle in this way, which is on the one hand demagogic in character and, on the other, superficial.
I modsætning hertil og selv om om kostningen ved at gøre det kun vil være 450 000 ECU. accepterer vi et ændringsforslag at hr. Elliot på vegne af Udvalget om Ungdom.
I believe — and this was the line taken by the Com mittee on Budgets, which was supported also by my Group — that Parliament, too, must respect its com mitments; that is to say, it must respect the large sums to which it committed itself, and hence must not agree, even at the first reading, to exceed the maxima that were laid down.
Kultur, Uddannelse, Information og Sport om at bruge 1 mio ECU på at fejre Den Franske Revolution. Min gruppe kan ikke acceptere denne form for prioritering.
I think this is essential in order to respect — and on this I insist — that agreement of a more global nature that we signed.
Vi stiller tids nok inden fristens udløb et ændringsforslag på 200 000 ECU til sidstnævnte formål, som vi anser for at være mere end tilstrækkeligt, og jeg håber, at dette kompromis vil opnå støtte fra andre grupper.
This seems to me to be a pragmatic, flexible solution that the Council should be able to adopt and — I repeat — that would allow us to express our decisions without
Derefter må jeg imidlertid udtrykke uenighed vedrørende landbrugsspørgsmålet.
I think that this is a dangerous operation, not least because it has one aspect that I wish to present in the form of a question.
Den er uacceptabel dels af formelle og dels af indholdsmæssige grunde.
I am sure you realize that we do not wish to start a debate on agricultural matters.
Til slut vil jeg sige, al såfremt vi kan finde frem til en sådan fælles holdning, der får så bred tilslutning som muligt her i Parlamentet, vil dette styrke vor hele stilling over for hele budgettet, og det vil også. tror jeg, undgå enhver strid med Rådet, som vi dog ikke ønsker, og fremme den fælles arbejdsform, som vi på nyttig måde er slået ind på efter underskrivelsen af den interinstitutionelle aftale.
the result of monetary movements — the movement of the dollar, with regard to which, moreover, we do not know what will happen in the coming months, although everyone forecasts that there will be a change in the situation, as all the papers have so far said — how can we think of setting in motion mechanisms that might in any event prejudice the policy of production control to which we have all given our support, especially since last year? I therefore think that, in this context, it is a dangerous mechanism.
Det har overrasket mig, hvad selve formanden for Budgetudvalget her har sagt.
We are not considering a rectifying let ter here, and we take it for granted that we should incorporate any new information on the estimated cost of the common agricultural policy.
Jeg mener, at vi må følge reglerne og afvente, at ændringsskrivelsen bliver os forelagt i den af Rådet vedtagne skikkelse.
It must be obvious — even to the Committee on Agriculture — that the time when we could fabricate or make policy by manipulating estimates is past.
Jeg anser dette for et yderst væsentligt punkt inden for budgetproceduren, og at det ikke kan være rigtigt at lade hånt om regler ne, selv om det nye skøn, som Kommissionen fore lægger, har en vis værdi. Dette var, hvad jeg ville sige om det formelle.
It would useful if, in the two days remaining before the vote is taken, our Parliament could find a com promise formula that would allow us on the one hand to take note in some way of the savings outlined by the Commission without, on the other hand, in any way prejudicing either the precise distribution of the savings amongst various lines or the alternative policies for increases in other lines, or indeed any other proposals.
Früh (PPE). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg er netop kom met tilbage fra et møde i Udvalget om Landbrug.
What we have here is an adjustment to estimates, not political proposals.
Men har pålagt mig på det skar peste at protestere mod den metode, der gås frem efter her.
You made some, we took note of them within our limits, examined them and finally rejected them.
Derfor skal der midt på dagen finde endnu et møde sted i Landbrugsudvalget, hvor vi vil søge efter muligheder og konstatere, om det overhovedet kan gå.
SCRIVENER (LDR). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, first of all, we have embarked on a new era of cooperation between Parliament and the Council, and welcome that fact.
Om det inholdsmæssige vil jeg i øvrigt sige. at vi på ingen måde kan gå ind på den detaljerede fordeling af de besparelser, som Kommissionen stiller os i udsigt, fordi vi bag ved Kommissionens nedskæringer såvel som bag modforslagene til forhøjelser på visse bud getposter og bag de forslag til forhøjelser, som Bud getudvalget selv stiller, f.eks. til indkomststøtte, kom mer ind til hele systemet i Fællesskabets landbrugspolitik, som jeg ikke finder det muligt at gå ind på på denne måde med en demagogisk gestus eller i hvert fald rent overfladisk.
In conclusion, Mr President, I should like to say that by achieving this common position, on the broadest possible basis within this Chamber, we should be strengthening our general position on the entire budget, and I think that that would also eliminate disputes — which moreover we do not look for — with the Council, thus promoting that basis for cooperation that was set so happily in motion with the signing of the Interinstitutional Agreement.
Jeg anser alt dette for yderst risikabelt, idet der jo også er en side af det, som jeg vil fremføre i spørgsmålsform.
I should like to state from the outset, however, that we do not- share the opinion adopted — or should I say rushed through — by a majority of the Committee on Budgets last night concerning the rectifying letter.
Fristen for ændringsforslag er allerede åbnet.
We have a deep divergence of opinion on this budgetary procedure.
De vil se, at der i disse ændringsforslag fra landbrugsside naturligvis også er indeholdt helt andre ideer om. hvorledes dette overskud skal anvendes.
Last Wednesday, the Commission informed us that it would forward to us a rectifying letter concerning the preliminary draft budget for 1989, which indicated both a reduction in expenditure under the EAGGF Guarantee Section and various surplus revenues arising from the 1987-88 financial year and traditional own resources.
Landbrugsudvalget protesterer på det skarpeste imod. at der her køres videre i den samme skure som hidtil.
FRÜH (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, I have just come out of a meeting of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, where I was told to lodge a very strong protest against the method that has been applied here.
Nogle medlemmer var af den mening, jeg citerer ordret: »Vi kan lige så godt gå i biografen, når vi her over faldes med forudfattede meninger, der fremføres som beslutninger«.
The committee objects to the fact that it did not receive a rectifying letter in the various lan guages until yesterday evening and so does not know what is going on, and that the letter covers only a few aspects of the agricultural policy.
Jeg vil gerne her på plenarmødet sige helt klart, at Landbrugsudvalget ikke kan acceptere denne metode, som også netop er blevet kritiseret af fru Barbarella.
A further meeting of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food should therefore be held this afternoon, at which we will consider if this is at all possible.
Hr. von der Vring, jeg ser, at De ønsker ordet.
The deadline for amendments has already been announced.
Jeg er sikker på, at De forstår, at vi ikke ønsker at indlede en drøftelse af landbrugsanliggender nu.
You will see, of course, that the amend ments tabled by the Committee on Agriculture contain completely different ideas on how this surplus should be used.
Er det rigtigt, at disse besparelser skyldes ændringer i valutakurserne, ændringer i dollarkursen, hvorom vi i øvrigt ikke ved, hvordan den vil te sig i de kommende måneder, omend alle venter nye ændringer, som vi kan læse i aviserne så sent som i dag?
The committee protests in the strongest possi ble terms against the way in which things have been done.
Hvis så er, hvordan kan vi da tænke på at iværksætte budget ændringer, der dog kunne bringe den produktionskontrolpolitik i fare, som vi alle har givet vor støtte, især siden sidste år?
Members felt — and I quote: 'We might as well go to the pictures if we are going to be presented with preconceived opinions that look very much like deci sions.'
Derfor mener jeg, at det i denne forbindelse er farligt at begynde med sådanne ændringer. ger.
I want to make it quite clear here in the Chamber that the Committee on Agriculture cannot accept this method, which Mrs Barbarella has just described as an impertinence.
Der er heller ingen mulig hed for at diskutere, om man kan erklære sig enig heri eller ej.
It offers no time for reflection, which would have en abled the Council, first of all, to consider all the information in the letter.
Det må stå klart — også for Landbrugsudvalget — at de tider er forbi, hvor vi kan føre en politik eller lade som om vi fører en politik ved at manipulere vurderingerne.
As we have just been told, the Committee on Agriculture would have needed that time to consider the agricultural aspects of the rectify ing letter, and I think it would have had many points to make on the subject.
De har haft mulighed for at
It does seem paradoxical, after all,
Det synes mig, at vi ellers ville gå for langt og tiltage os beføjelser, der ikke tilkommer os.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Früh, that was not a point of order but it could be useful information in the discussion we are having.
Scrivener (LDR). — (FR) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, først vil jeg sige, at vi nu er kommet ind i en tid med samarbejde mellem Parlamentet og Rådet, som vi vil udtrykke vor glæde over.
genuine powers of initiative. I therefore regret all the more deeply the decisions taken last night by the Committee on Budgets, which place at risk the new relations that should be established between the Council and Parliament after the signature of the Interinstitutional Agreement.
Der er faktisk blevet udført et betydeligt arbejde i vort Bud getudvalg i forrige uge, og vi kan kun glæde os over det omfattende arbejde, som er udført af vor ord fører, hr. von der Vring, som jeg gerne her vil takke for dette.
I also regret the fact that those generally referred to as the 'small groups' were excluded from the preliminary discussions that led to the adoption of this position by the committee .
Jeg vil dog med det samme sige, at vi ikke er enige med flertallet i Budgetudvalget om den stillingtagen til ændringsskrivelsen, der blev vedtaget i går, i øvrigt i huj og hast. Vi er dybt uenige om budgetproceduren.
To sum up, let me say that these criticisms are not directed at all the work accomplished last week, but it is a pity that some people thought, as in the past, that Parliament's success should be measured in terms of votes cast by the delegations in the Council.
Det, der er sket, er, at Kommissionen i onsdags gav os meddelelse om, at den ville sende os en ændringsskrivelse til det foreløbige budgetforslag for 1989, der dels indeholdt en nedsættelse af udgifterne til EUFGL's garantisektion og dels ekstra indtægter overført fra regnskabsårene 1987 og 1988 og forøgelser af de traditionelle egne indtægter.
Might I also point out that it is evident that either there really was an urgent need to take the rectifying letter into account, in which case we should not have confined ourselves to the expenditure aspect alone, or — as we think — we had ample time to comply with the rules of procedure, and should have waited until a draft was submitted by the Council to consider in detail its implications for both expenditure and reven ues.
Indtil denne sidste uge havde vi faktisk taget en yderst forsigtig linje. Vi havde vedtaget fuldt ud at respektere ikke blot ordlyden, men også ånden i den interinstitutionelle aftale om budgetdisciplin.
PASTY (RDE). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the draft budget for 1989, the first year in which the Interinstitutional Agreement and the financial programming system will be carried into effect, should have received a broad consensus.
Vi hav de vedtaget at overholde de udgiftslofter, der er inde holdt i de finansielle overslag, og vi havde samlet vor indsats om udgiftsgruppen andre former for politik, da det er på dette område, Rådet havde gennemført de fleste nedskæringer i Kommissionens foreløbige budgetforslag.
Unfortunately, this will not be the case due to yesterday's vote by the Committee on Budgets, which has the effect of curtailing agricultural guarantee section spending by more than a billion ECU in 1989.
I dag foreslår Budgetsudvalget nu uden af afvente, at Rådet i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne om budgetbehandlingen vedtager en sådan ændringsskri velse, at Parlamentet med det samme drager konsekvenserne af et sådant udkast til ændringsskrivelse, i øvrigt uden at have sikkerhed for, at tallene er ende lige.
To sum up the first part of my speech, Mr President, my Group will not be voting for the amendments tabled by the Committee on Budgets with a view to taking into account immediately the contents of the Commission's preliminary draft rectifying letter.
Vi støtter ligeledes de prioriteringer, der fremgår af de i udvalget vedtagne udgiftsforhøjelser.
Of course, Mr President, the points I have just made do not cover all the results achieved by the Committee on Budgets.
Dette gælder miljøet; vi er for en virkelig indsats til bekæmpelse af forureningen, navnlig i Nordsøen.
Our committee worked very hard last week, and we must welcome the considerable efforts made by the general rapporteur, Mr von der Vring, whom I take this opportunity to thank.
Det gælder også transportpolitikken; det er klart, at en forbedring af transportinfrastrukturen inden for Fællesskabet vil yde et betydeligt bidrag til at nå frem til et reelt indre marked i 1993.
Three Groups in this Parliament deemed it necessary to incorporate into this draft budget the data con tained in the rectifying letter the Commission has just submitted to the Council, which predicts, as I said, a reduction in agricultural expenditure of one billion ECU in 1988 and 1.4 billion ECU in 1989.
Det gælder endvidere fødevarebistanden; det er klart, at de mængder, der er optaget på budgettet, bør kunne fastholdes, medens budgettet gennemføres.
Our Group regards that course of action as unacceptable both in form and substance, in other words, the treatment accorded to Community farmers.
Denne tanke er allerede blevet accepteret af Kommissionen, og vi må derefter søge at få en politisk aftale i stand med Rådet.
It casts new doubts on the very principle of our adhesion to the Interinstitutional Agreement and the financial perspective until 1992.