natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For det andet udvider det direktivet til at omfatte enhver oplagring af farlige stoffer, og for det tredje styrker det i væsentlig grad dets bestemmelser vedrørende informering af offentligheden, ved at det fastsætter en aktiv forpligtelse til uden forudgående anmodning at meddele oplysninger, som er detaljerede og selvfølgelig yderst vigtige, om de farlige stoffer såvel som risiciene til de personer, der er anført i direktivets bestemmelser.
Second, it extends the scope of the directive to all dangerous storage and thirdly, it substantially strengthens its provisions regarding public information in that it lays down a positive obligation to communicate, without any request being made, information which is detailed and, of course, extremely important concerning the dangerous substances involved as well as the risks entailed to the persons specified in the terms of the directive.
Der er et andet spørgsmål, som jeg gerne vil gøre opmærksom på.
The result — and I do not know if it is entirely satisfactory — is the proposal for a directive that we are examining today.
Jeg kan ikke huske, hvilket af de ærede medlemmer der rejste spørgsmålet, men det vedrørte forpligtelsen til at indarbejde direktivet fra 1982 i den nationale lovgivning.
I do know that these changes are not wholly satisfactory from every point of view because they clearly do not cover all aspects of accident prevention.
Som jeg har gjort klart ved flere lejligheder tidligere, har der væreet tale om væsentlige brud i denne henseende, og Kommis sionen havde da heller ikke andet alternativ end at anlægge sag mod de medlemsstater, som ikke opfyldte deres forpligtelser.
But it represents another step forward and as such it must be accepted. Obviously the directive's field of application is substantially widened by this change, given that the Seveso directive only covered two storage categories for dangerous chemicals.
Det glæder mig overordentlig meget, at Miljøudvalget i sin meget positive udtalelse erkender forslagets værdi.
I am extremely pleased that the Environment Com mittee has recognized the value of the proposal in its very positive opinion.
Det glæder mig også at være i stand til at acceptere ændringsforslag nr. 1 og 3.
I am also pleased to be able to accept Amendments Nos 1 and 3.
For så vidt angår ændringsforslag nr. 2, er denne ide allerede underforstået i direktivet, da nødplanerne for farlige anlæg skal sikre, at der findes egnede og effektive førstehjælpscentre.
As far as Amend ment No 2 is concerned, this concept is already implicit in the directive because the emergency plans of dangerous installations have to provide for suitable and effective first aid centres.
Jeg mener således ikke, at dette er nødvendigt, og jeg kan derfor ikke formelt acceptere ændringsforslag nr. 2.
So, I do not think that is necessary and, therefore, I cannot formally accept Amendment No 2.
Formanden. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
ters will see this, that once again on a vital environmental issue it is good that the Commission and Par liament — and I believe on this occasion, too, the Council — are in substantial agreement.
er på sin plads, at medlemsstaterne efter så mange år ikke opfylder en så fundamental forpligtelse som den pågældende.
As the rapporteur I wanted to make a few comments on the line taken by the Commission, which rejects Amendment No 2 — a recital in which we called on Member States to ensure that suitably equipped firstaid centres are located within reasonably easy reach of the area presumed to be at risk.
Jeg takker Parlamentet for den støtte, det har givet i denne henseende, og jeg takker også Parlamentet for den måde, dette spørgsmål er blevet behandlet på, og for den energiske og fantasifulde måde, hvorpå ordføreren og hendes udvalg har opfyldt deres for pligtelser i denne forbindelse.
Mrs Weber said that she hoped that the report relating to the matter of the application in the Member States of the 1982 directive would be available soon. Uncharacteristically, she has not received a complete briefing on this matter because, in fact, that report was made available to Par liament many months ago.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er be tænkning (dok.
The Commissioner — if I understood right — said that this concept is implicit in the earlier directives.
A2-183/88) af Nordmann for Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbruger beskyttelse om forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet (KOM(87) 581 endel. -C2-281/87) til direktiv om niende ændring af direktiv 73/241/EØF om tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om kakao- og chokoladevarer bestemt til konsum.
I say that it is implicit for Member States of goodwill: that is to say, if a Member State seriously intends to draw up firstaid emergency plans in advance, it can not do without such installations.
Squarcialupi (COM), ordfører. — (IT) Hr. formand, endnu en gang ser vi, hvorledes en placering i denne side af salen ikke er en fordel, men derimod medfører den ulempe, at man hele tiden skal påkalde sig for mandsskabets opmærksomhed.
But not all Member States have so far shown this goodwill.
Som ordfører vil jeg gøre nogle bemærkning er om det, som er blevet sagt af Kommissionen, der forkaster ændringsforslag nr. 2: en betragtning, hvori vi anmoder om, at medlemsstaterne skal sikre, at der findes korrekt udstyrede bedriftssundhedstjenester in den for en passende afstand fra det sted, der frembyder en risiko.
Furthermore, speaking of the report to which Com missioner Clinton Davis referred, I have to say that this report does effectively exist, but it has never been distributed to the members of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection.
Hvis jeg forstod det rigtigt, sagde kom missæren, at dette begreb er underforstået i de tidligere direktiver.
I had a copy, simply in my capacity as rapporteur.
Jeg siger, at det er underforstået for stater afgod vilje, dvs. hvis en stat seriøst disponerer over beredskabsplaner, kan den ikke undvære disse installationer, men hidtil har ikke alle staterne udvist denne vilje.
It is perhaps not the fault of the Commission — per haps it is Parliament's own fault; but in all events it would be a good thing if, when there is an important document from the Commission, such as the report on the application of the Seveso directive, which is dated 12 May, it could five months later be in the hands of those honourable Members who are concerned with this problem.
Nordmann (LDR), ordfører. — (FR) Hr. formand, da jeg var barn, vægrede jeg mig ofte ved at spise min suppe.
As far as the question of the extra-Community aspect of the matter is concerned, I would draw the attention of the House to this.
En dag fandt mine forældre på at komme chokolade i denne suppe for at forbedre smagen og gøre den sødere.
The first was a decision on the exchange of information concerning accidents capable of causing transfrontier damage.
Jeg tror faktisk, at mine forældre havde en forudanelse om min frem tidige virksomhed som parlamentarisk ordfører, for »chocolate a la taza« og »chocolate familiar a la taza« er netop en slags chokoladesuppe, en slags suppe på basis af kakao, der er gjort mere tyktflydende ved tilsætning af stivelsesholdige stoffer.
The second was another decision, a recommendation concerning provision of information to the public and public participation in decision-making processes relating to the prevention of and response to accidents involving hazardous substances.
Det er lykkedes mig, i øvrigt efter en del vanskeligheder, for dette produkt er ikke almindeligt udbredt, at finde det igen i Sydspanien, i Almeria-provinsen, hvor Ud valget om Miljø- og Sundhedsnaliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse for nylig har holdt møde.
That decision will, in particular, establish the principle that those members of the public potentially affected shall be provided with information on safety measures and the appropriate behaviour to adopt in the event of an accident as well as on the potentially dangerous effects.
Kommissionen foreslår at tilføje dette produkt til listen over kakao- og chokoladeproduktcr i cirkulæret fra 1973, i øvrigt som en undtagelsesbestemmelse, begrænset til markedsføring og konsum i Spanien.
CLINTON DAVIS, Member of the Commission. — Mr President, I cannot really carry the argument about the distribution of the report any further. It is certainly not the responsibility of the Commission and no doubt that is a matter which will be examined by Parliament.
Med hensyn til den rapport, som kommissær Clinton Davis henviste til, må jeg sige, at faktisk findes rapporten, men den er aldrig blevet uddelt til medlem merne af Miljøudvalget.
As for the question of Amendment No 2, I think, with respect, that it is embraced by Article 7 of the 1982 directive.
Jeg har kun fået et eksemplar i min egenskab af ordfører.
I won't rehearse the argument now, but I believe that is right.
Clinton Davis, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg kan ikke rigtig komme med yderligere forklaringer vedrørende omdelingen af rapporten.
As I have made plain on a number of occasions in the past, there were substantial breaches in that regard and, indeed, the Commission had no alternative but to bring proceedings against those Member States who were not fulfilling their obligations.
Det er absolut ikke Kommissionens ansvar, og det er uden tvivl et spørgsmål, som vil blive undersøgt af Parlamentet.
I am glad to say that a great deal of progress now seems to have been made following the actions which the Commission has taken, actions which I believe were warmly supported in this House and by the public outside because, as I have repeatedly said, it is not good enough that Member States should fail after so many years to fulfil an obligation as fundamental as the one in question.
Jeg vil ikke gentage det argument nu, men jeg mener, det er rigtigt.
The vote will take place at noon tomorrow.
Mine egne tjenestegrene er af den opfattelse, at ordet underforstået måske ikke er det bedste ord at bruge, og hvis jeg har vildledt Parlamentet i denne henseende ved at bruge det, beder jeg Dem undskylde.
I thank the House for the support that it has given in that regard and indeed I thank the House for the way in which this matter has been pursued and for the energetic and imaginative manner in which the rapporteur and her committee have fulfilled their particular duties in this connection.
Jeg vil absolut se nærmere på det, men det er de oplysninger, jeg for øjeblikket har til rådighed.
SQUARCIALUPI (COM), rapporteur. — (IT) Mr President, once again we see how being seated in this part of the Chamber brings with it no advantages —
Den ene ste grund til, at vi besluttede ikke at bede Parlamentet om at gøre det, var, at det i dette tilfælde ville straffe producenterne i en enkelt medlemsstat.
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(87) 581 final — Doc.
Men samtidig vil jeg gerne advare Kommissionen mod udvalgets utålmodighed med denne form for lovgivning, og at hvis det kommer op igen i en mere generel form, vil udvalget sandsynligvis bede Parlamentet om at blokere det.
C 2-281/87) for a directive amending for the ninth time Directive 73/241/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cocoa and chocolate products intended for human consumption.
Derfor kan Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse ikke følge visse dele af udtalelsen fra Udvalget om Økonomi, Valutaspørgsmål og Industripolitik, hvor det foreslås på længere sigt ganske enkelt at tage direktivet fra 1973 tilbage, fór noget sådant ville være ensbetydende med at åbne en Pandoras æske af stridigheder og sager indbragt for Domstolen i tilfælde af, at anvendelsen af princippet om gensidig anerkendelse støder på for hindringer i form af forskellige traditioner for fabrikation og markedsføring.
beyond the debate with which we are concerned today and repealing the 1973 directive outright, for that would mean opening a Pandora's box of disagreement and litigation before the Court of Justice in cases where the application of the principle of mutual recognition conflicted with differing manufacturing and marketing traditions.
Dette kunne således endnu en gang vække de tidligere stridigheder til live. som vi har været i stand til at begrænse og sætte en stopper for med tilbagetagning af Kommissionens foregående forslag.
That could revive the old arguments which we managed to limit and bring to an end only by obtaining the withdrawal of the Commission's previous proposal.
I dette perspektiv skal jeg fremhæve, hr. formand, at for en, der jævnligt har til opgave at være ordfører i spørgsmål vedrørende kakao og chokolade, er det yderst behageligt at arbejde i en atmosfære af enighed og konsensus i Parlamentet vedrørende dette vigtige spørgsmål — men én gang er ingen gang.
So I should like to say, Mr President, that for someone who is used to reporting on questions con cerning cocoa and chocolate, it is particularly pleasant to do so, for once, in an atmosphere of agreement and consensus in Parliament on this important subject.
Elliott (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, min grundholdning er meget let at tilkendegive.
NORDMANN (LDR), rapporteur. — (FR) Mr President, when I was a child, I often made a fuss about eating the soup that had been prepared for me.
Men med hensyn til de mere generelle aspekter befinder jeg mig et eller andet sted mellem det synspunkt, hr. Nordmann gav udtryk for, og det, hr. O'Malley gav udtryk for.
Well, Mr President, I think my parents must have had a strange premonition of my future career as a parliamentary rapporteur, since the chocolate drink known as 'a la taza' or 'familiar a la taza' is a kind of chocolate soup or cocoa-based gruel thickened with starch.
Jeg mener ikke, at vi bør forsøge at standardisere alt, absolut ikke fødevarer. På den anden side er jeg ikke helt glad for Kommis sionens nye fremgangsmåde på visse områder, selv om den måske er mere hensigtsmæssig på dette om råde end på visse andre.
I eventually managed to find some — with some difficulty, for this product is not very usual or common — in southern Spain, in the Almería region, where the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Pro tection met recently.
O'Malley (PPE), ordfører for udtalelsen fra Udvalget om Økonomi, Valutaspørgsmål og Industripolitik. — (EN) Hr. formand, det er korrekt, når hr. Nordmann siger, at der en meningsforskel mellem de to udvalg, ikke med hensyn til, hvad vi skal gøre med denne ændring af lovgivningen, men med hensyn til princip pet bag den.
O'MALLEY (PPE), draftsman of the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy. — Mr President, Mr Nordmann is correct in saying that there is a disagreement between the two committees involved not on what to do with this amendment to the legislation but on the principle behind it.
I Parlamentet er jeg sandsynligvis for øjeblikket talmæssigt underlegen over for medlem merne af hans udvalg.
In the House at this moment I am probably outnumbered by members of his committee.
Det er denne slags forhandling, som giver Det Europæiske Fællesskab et dårligt re nommé.
It is this kind of debate that gives the European Community a bad name.
I sine indledende bemærkninger underholdte hr. Nordmann os meget med sin beretning om sin barndom — jeg fandt det fascinerende.
The Commission proposes adding this product to the list of cocoa and chocolate products defined in the 1973 circular, as a special case exclusively for sale and consumption in Spain.
Men jeg tror ikke, jeg ville bryde mig om, at man kom kakao i min suppe, og jeg håber blot, at medlemmernes restaurant i Parlamentet ikke får nys om dette.
Some Members of this House will be aware of a British political comedy series called Yes Minister.
Hvis den gør, vil jeg aldrig spise der igen. Vi har imidlertid alle vore mærkværdige nationale svagheder, hvad angår spise vaner, og vi erkender, at vi ikke bør blande os i disse vaner.
In that series the issue which propels the hero into the office of prime minister is the defence of the Great British sausage against the Eurocrats who are proposing a standardized Eurosausage.
At gøre noget sådant i et større omfang kunne sagtens i visse tilfælde fremkalde tumulter i gader ne.
If it does nothing else, it illustrates how this approach to European standardization brings the Community into ridicule.
Nogle medlemmer af Parlamentet vil være bekendt med den britiske politiske komedieserie, Javel, hr. minister.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection fully approves the Commission's proposal, which is designed to guarantee Com munity equality with regard to the manufacture and consumption of a product traditionally consumed in a region of the Community.
I denne serie er det spørgsmål, som driver helten ind i premierministerembedet, forsvaret af den »store britiske pølse« mod eurokraterne, som foreslår en standardiseret »euro-pølse«.
That is all the Commission proposal consists of, and the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection proposes that Parliament should endorse the circumscribed provisions I have described.
Hvis det ikke gør andet, så illustrerer det, hvordan denne måde at gribe den europæiske standardisering an på latterliggør Fællesskabet.
Our committee proposes that you follow the Commission's lead on the subject.
Jeg har denne mærkværdige britiske vane med gerne at ville hælde store mængder mælk i min te, hvilket man i en række lande i Europa anser for at være en mellemting mellem at være excentrisk og uappetitlig.
Of course, the legalization by the Community of 'a la taza' chocolate in no way prejudices solutions to any problems that could arise some day if a Spanish exporter wished to market his product as chocolate in another Community country whose standards, rules and traditions precluded the addition of the starchy substances used in the manufacture of this Spanish product.
Men det er noget, jeg godt kan lide, og hvorfor så ikke?
That question must be reserved, and I do not think it should be raised lightly.
Mange troede, at en sådan latterlig standardisering hørte fortiden til.
A lot of people thought that such ludicrous standardization was a thing of the past.
Men her har vi den igen i forbindelse med chokolade.
But here we have it again today in the case of chocolate.
Vi har stadig en situation, hvor chokolade, som produceres i mange medlemsstater, herunder min, er forbudt i andre dele af Fællesskabet.
We still have a situation where chocolate produced in many Member States, including my own, is prohibited in other parts of the Community.
Efterhånden som vi nærmer os 1992, bør vi bede Kommissionen om at forelægge forslag for at rydde den slags lovgivning af vejen.
As we move down the road towards 1992 we should be asking the Commission to put forward proposals to sweep away that kind of legislation.
I stedet for at forsøge nøje at definere, hvad chokolade er, bør vi gå over til den nye fremgangsmåde, nemlig at det, der er sikkert, acceptabelt og hygiejnisk i én medlemsstat, bør god kendes og kunne sælges i andre medlemsstater.
Instead of trying to narrowly define what chocolate is, we should be moving over to the new approach that whatever is safe, acceptable and hygienic in one Member State should be accepted and allowed to be sold in other Member States.
Det bør så overlades til forbrugeren at træffe sit eget valg.
It should then be left to the consumer to decide.
Vi bør ikke udarbejde retsforskrifter, som fortæller folk, om en bestemt type chokolade er chokolade
We should not be putting out legislation telling people whether one type of chocolate is chocolate or not — that is some thing which should be left to the market.
Jeg glæder mig derfor over hans fremgangsmåde, men sammenligner den lidt med fremgangsmåden i for bindelse med en tidligere ændring af direktivet, som heldigvis blev taget tilbage, og som hr. O'Malley hen viste til.
This is why the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy considers it is unacceptable that this kind of legislation should still exist and that we are tinkering around with the old approach.
Det var den ændring, som ville have krævet af os i Storbrtitannien, Danmark og Irland, som har den vane og lange tradition at komme vegetabilske fedtstoffer i vor chokolade, og som nyder chokolade,
In fact the committee seriously considered asking the House to block this amendment. The only reason we decided not to ask the House to do so was that in this case it
Den anerkender, at dette er et særligt og ret usædvanligt produkt, som findes i én medlemsstat, og er enig i, at vi bør erkende, at de har ret til fortsat at producere og konsumere det.
Certainly I feel that approach is particularly appropriate in the field of food products where there are such widely differing national and traditional practices and ideas.
Vi løb for nylig ind i dette problem i mit land i for bindelse med emballeringen af en lille flaske whisky, som meget sødt går under navnet Baby Power.
However, I have certain reservations on the general position in relation to mutual acceptability.
Kom missionen havde i sinde at fortælle os. at vor kære små Baby /Ovrø-flasker ikke længere kunne accepteres. Da jeg derpå tog dette produkt i forsvar i Parlamentet, troede alle, at det var min spøg, men det gjorde befolkningen i mit land ikke.
There may be some instances where mutual acceptability of each other's products could lead to a reduction in safety or quality standards.
Jeg mener absolut, at denne fremgangsmåde er særlig hensigtsmæssig på levnedsmiddelområdet, hvor der er meget vidt forskellige nationale og traditionelle skikke og ideer.
On the other hand I do not feel entirely happy about the new Commission approach in certain areas, though perhaps it is more appropriate in this area than in some others.
Jeg har imidlertid visse forbehold med hensyn til den generelle holdning i forbindelse med gensidig anerkendelse.
I do have some doubts and worries about this particular approach in certain areas, but in the context of chocolate products, with which we are concerned today, I do not have any problems.
Der må være nogle tilfælde, hvor en gensidig anerkendelse af hinandens produkter kan medføre en nedsættelse af sikkerheds- eller kvalitetsnormerne.
It is a matter of preserving each country's individual approaches and attitudes towards food, and that is something we should accept.
Vi elsker dem. vi anser dem for at være et produkt af høj kvalitet, og vi har i sinde fortsat at spise dem til trods for hr. Nordmanns betænkeligheder ved dem. Alligevel komplimenterer vi hr. Nordmann.
In his introductory remarks Mr Nordmann amused us all very much with the account of his childhood — I found it fascinating.
Vor gruppe vil støtte hans betænkning, og jeg håber, Kommissionen vil kommentere de meget vigtige spørgsmål, hr. O'Malley rejste i sit ind læg.
However, I do not think I would care too much for having cocoa put into my soup and I only hope that the Members' restaurant in Parliament does not get wind of this.
Det er et spørgsmål om at bevare hvert enkelt lands individuelle indstilling og holdning til fødevarer, og det er noget, vi bør acceptere.
To do so to any great extent might well provoke rioting in the streets in some instances.
Cassidy (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil ikke bringe nogen meningskamp på bane under denne for handling — hvilket de få tilstedeværende medlemmer uden tvivl vil føle sig lettet ved at høre.
I have this curious British habit of wanting to pour vast quantities of milk into my tea, which is regarded in a number of countries in Europe as coming somewhere between being eccentric and being disgusting. How ever, it is something I like, and why not?
Jeg glæder mig meget over hr. Nordmanns betænkning, og vi vil støtte den på enhver måde.
If Mr Nordmann wants to put cocoa into anything, as far as I am concerned he is entitled to do so.
Banotti (PPE). - (EN) Hr. formand, det er en stor fornøjelse for mig at stå her i aften og støtte hr. Nordmanns betænkning.
BANOTTI (PPE). — Mr President, it is a great plea sure for me this evening to be standing here support ing Mr Nordmann's report.