natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg har villet erindre om denne sammenhæng, hr. for mand, fordi det netop er i lyset af denne situation og de vanskeligheder, som følger deraf, at det forekom mer mig vigtigt kraftigt at understrege den kendsgerning, at vi er solidariske med alle dem — først og fremmest med Kommissionen og kommissionsformanden — som i modsætning hertil ønsker og søger at holde det centrale spørgsmål om det kommunitære Europas udvikling åbent.
Obviously, we reserve the right to look at the proposals in detail at a later stage; however, we feel we must point out now that there seem to be contradictions between the great, general affirmation you have made
Men læg mærke til, at jeg ikke siger, at reformen ikke skal gennemføres.
— with which, I repeat, we are entirely in agreement — and the concrete manner in which you propose they should be implemented.
Det forekommer os kort sagt, at de synspunkter, som ligger til grund for det program, som vi har fået forelagt her i formiddag, netop sigter på at holde Europas udviklingsmuligheder åbne.
We aspire to democratic control, but we do not have it yet because we are excluded from the management committees and the regulatory committees of the Commission and the working parties of the Council.
Når jeg har sagt dette og manifesteret den solidaritet, som jeg fandt burde udtrykkes, vil jeg samtidig give udtryk for nogle alvorlige bekymringer, som vi nærer med hensyn til den konkrete anvendelse af de synspunkter som De, hr. Delors, har omtalt for os her i formiddag.
Very briefly, Mr President, if we take as a whole the package of measures that you outlined to us for the reform of the common agricultural policy and the reform of the funds, we seem to detect a tendency that, in the conflict — if I can so describe it — between the interests of the North and those of the South of Europe, ends up in fact by favouring the countries of Northern Europe.
Jeg kommer nu til det andet punkt, som vi betragter som endnu vigtigere : reformen af strukturpolitikken. Meget af det, som siges i programmet, er vi helt enige i.
BARBARELLA (COM). — (IT) Mr President, I do not think that anyone in this Chamber today is shut ting his eyes to the difficulties in which both we and the Commission find ourselves.
Der er imidlertid en ting, som jeg et øjeblik vil bede Dem overveje. De taler for eksempel om en fordobling af midlerne til dette formål.
I am referring to the urgent need to find at last a solution to problems that have been awaiting a solution for a long time.
Har Kommissionen tilbundsgående vurderet den virkning, den effekt, som indførelsen af det indre marked vil have for Fæl lesskabets svageste områder?
I think that none of us could have imagined that the governments, their ministers, could have taken 14 hours of discussions to decide on an increase of 4.7 million ECU in the 1987 budget.
Det er med udgangspunkt i den vurdering — og kun i den form for vurdering — at jeg tror, det vil være muligt realistisk at skønne om nødvendigheden af den strøm af finansiering, som må sættes i værk.
I think that no one would have imagined such haggling, which resulted in cutting a financial commitment for a programme such as the one that was put forward for research.
For jeg tror — og det er netop meningen med det, jeg ville understrege — at dette vil gøre det muligt for os at vurdere kvaliteten ved det ny Europa, som De erklærer at ville skabe, at vurdere det forhold, der eksisterer mellem indførelsen af dette indre marked og gennemførelsen af den sammenhæng, som De læg ger stor vægt på, i øvrigt også vi.
And when I say logic, I am not only referring to what Europe's approach should be in its international relations — and what that should therefore imply on the domestic front: I am referring also to the scope of agriculture, as we should be able to shape it in the 1980s and 1990s — an agriculture that should form a dynamic part of the European economy.
Kort sagt, hr. formand, hvis vi betragter hele den pakke af elementer, som De fremlægger til en reform af den fælles landbrugspolitik, til en reform af fonde ne og til de nye egne indtægter, så forekommer det os, at der er en tendens til i konflikten — hvis jeg kan bruge det ord — mellem interesserne i Nord- og Sydeuropa, at ende med faktisk at tilgodese landene i Nordeuropa.
I wanted to recall this context, Mr President, because it is precisely in the light of this situation and the difficulties that follow from it that it seems to me important to emphasize, forcefully, the fact that we stand firm beside all those — imprimis the Commission and the President of the Commission — who, on the con trary, want to keep open and are trying to keep open the central question of the development of the European Community.
Endelig er der den tredje overvejelse, som jeg vil hen lede Deres opmærksomhed på: de nye midler.
Take note, I do not mean that there should not be any reform.
Jeg vil ikke komme ind på detaljerne; det vil der blive lejlighed til.
In short — I have not much time, but we will come back to this — this mechanism that you are proposing still does not seem to me to go to the real heart of the reform.
Og jeg vil gerne, hvis jeg må, kort beskæftige mig med det konkrete først og fremmest ved at se på den fælles landbrugspolitik.
It seems to us that the guidelines underlying the pro gramme that was presented to us this morning are directed exactly towards keeping open Europe's development potential.
Jeg tror, at hvis man går bag om ordene, så er det, der bliver os foreslået, ikke en virkelig og egentlig reform af den fælles landbrugspolitik.
Moreover, I should like also to recall that these are the same guidelines that were con tained in the Commission's four-year programme at the start of its mandate, and that this Parliament then expressed its full agreement with those guidelines.
Der forudses mange justeringer, nogle er ganske vist af stor betydning, men jeg finder ikke, at man beskæftiger sig med logikken i denne politik.
I come now to the second point, which I consider to be of still greater importance — the reform of the structural policies.
Under denne synsvinkel ser jeg endnu ikke, hvordan reformen skal fungere, det vil sige jeg kan ikke rigtig se, hvad forholdet er mellem den åbenbare
We are in total agreement with many of the things that are said in your programme. There is however one, on which I should just like to ask you to reflect.
Jeg vil beskæftige mig med de nye mekanismer, som foreslås.
You talk, for example, of the doubling of resources for this purpose.
I den forbindelse vil jeg udtrykke en stor frygt.
But on the basis of what assessment, President Delors?
Heller ikke forsøget på at nå frem til ligevægt mellem momsen og bruttonationalproduktet — reelt for at finde en løsning på kompensationsproblemet — synes mig i den konkrete form, det foreligger, at være tilstrækkeligt til at klare problemet. Jeg vil i øvrigt erindre Dem om, at der her i Parlamentet har fundet
Having said this, and having therefore shown the solidarity that I felt it my duty to make clear, I should like at the same time to express some deep-rooted doubts in our minds as to the concrete application of the guidelines that you, President Delors, have spelt out this morning.
Barbarella vi er alvorligt bekymrede over, at rammeprogrammet for 1987 endnu ikke er blevet vedtaget.
Barbarella of proposals to the European Parliament, even though we naturally have some reservations on specific points.
bitre kampe sted om nødvendigheden af, at kompensationerne for den manglende balance blev givet over udgiftpolitikken og ikke gennem »grønne« fordelingsnøgler. nøgler.
assessment — that I think any realistic estimate is possible of the financing needs for which provision must be made.
Jeg tror, at kun på den måde vil vi have mulighed for at foretage en endelig vurdering af indholdet og dermed af de kvalitative valg, som Kommissionen vil have truffet. fet.
From which it follows, in this context, that the simultaneity of which you speak cannot remain just a word — it must take con crete form through very tangible action.
Veil (LDR). - (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, det er kommissionsformanden, jeg henvender mig til, når jeg siger, at De formodentlig ikke er vant til i denne sal at høre et så kraftigt bifald fra alle sider som i formiddags.
This is in fact the first time since the direct elections to this Parliament in 1979 that we have had the feeling that the Commission is showing clear-sightedness and determination to achieve certain objectives. Your approach has been pragmatic but constructive.
Hvad angår de finansielle midler, som De foreslår, forekommer det os hensigtsmæssigt at finde ekstra midler via et nyt system.
And we welcome the Single Act, which, although we found that it did not go far enough, is now in a fair way to being our^ible.
Vi har tidligere understreget, og vi har ofte været ret isolerede i vores synspunkt, i hvor ringe grad Fontainebleau-bestemmelserne var i stand til at løse Fællesskabets alvorlige finansieringsproblem. Det er imidlertid temmelig sent at gøre sig dette klart i dag.
In this Single Act we find a concrete objective — completion of the internal market — together with specification of the ways and means of attaining it.
Jeg vil gøre Dem opmærksom på, at de foranstaltninger, der tales om i dag, må være tilstrækkeligt enkle til ikke at give anledning til nye stridigheder mellem staterne, og at de må bevare et fællesskabspræg.
You also showed determination to achieve your objectives, expressing the hope that our governments too will show political will.
På dette punkt har vi ikke fået tilstrækkelige garantier.
Since I can not go into details, I shall confine myself to a few comments, starting with the objectives.
Hvad angår me toderne, forekommer det os, at et bedre samarbejde med Parlamentet, som De omtalte, må indbefatte præcise forpligtelser med hensyn til at fastsætte da toer for dette samarbejde om programmet.
First of all, we wholeheartedly approve of the accent placed on the internal market and the concern to reconcile retention of the key principles of the com mon agricultural policy with the vital need to develop structural policies aimed at the creation of a real economic area, not just a transfer of certain funds from the Community into national policies.
Hvad an går en bedre styring fra Kommissionens side, ønsker vi ligeledes at få en tilknytning, naturligvis under den forudsætning, at Europa-Parlamentets samarbejde hverken tynger eller blokerer Kommissionens arbejde. de.
We naturally agree with your concern to develop research, since this has always been our group's priority, although we are extremely worried at the thought that, as far as 1987 is concerned, the framework programme has not yet been adopted.
Også selv om vi selvfølgelig må udtrykke forbehold på visse særlige områder.
I want to come to the new mechanisms that you put before us. They fill me full of fear.
Efter disse bemærkninger vil jeg sige, at der stadig væk er anledning til bekymring, navnlig hvad angår Kommissionens daglige arbejde og gennemførelsen af det indre marked. Mener De ikke, at med hensyn til harmoniseringen er en større forenkling nødvendig navnlig af normerne?
In my opinion, the mechanism of the levy is in reality an abandonment of the financial autonomy of the Community; it is, for better or worse, a return to the system of financial contributions at a time when the contentiousness, the unconstructiveness, the back-tracking of Member States threaten to weaken substantially the autonomy of the Community.
Vi er meget bekymrede over at konstatere, at der ikke finder en tilstrækkelig udvælgelse af projekter sted, og at langsommelighed og træghed stadig er et stort problem, selv om jeg må erkende, at Kommissionen har gjort mærkbare frem skridt på dette område.
I should like moreover to remind you that there have been bitter battles in this Parliament over the need for the compensation of imbalances to be effected within the framework of expenditure policy and not through 'green' distribution keys.
Hvad der imidlertid foruroliger os mest, er at Deres program ganske vist har den fordel at være globalt, men at dette samtidig indebærer en stor risiko.
And this is the yardstick by which we shall assess the policies that the Commission and you yourself, Mr President, put forward to us in the months to come.
Hvis regeringerne forkaster det i maj, hvad kan Fællesskabet så gøre?
I think this is the only way that we shall be able to give a final verdict on the content and, therefore, on the policy that the Commission has been able to pursue.
Det er første gang, siden vi blev valgt i 1979, at vi har en fornemmelse af, at Kommissionen udviser klarsynethed og beslutsomhed med henblik på at nå be stemte mål.
With regard to the financial resources that you pro pose, the adoption of a new system to raise additional revenues is something that we find appropriate.
Fremgangsmåden er pragmatisk, men konstruktiv.
In the past we have insisted, often in isolation, that the arrangements agreed at Fontainebleau are quite inadequate to resolve the serious problem of the Com munity's finances.
Og vi glæder os over den fælles akt, som vi ganske vist har kritiseret for ikke at gå tilstrækkelig langt, men som i dag nærmest er vores bibel.
The realization may be dawning now, but it is very late in the day.
Vi hefter os især ved en konkret målsætning i den fælles akt, nemlig gennemførelsen af det indre marked og fastsættelsen af midler og metoder til at gennemføre det.
Nevertheless, I should like to draw your attention to the need for measures envisaged now to be simple enough to avoid giving rise to further disputes between States and for them to remain communautaires in character.
De har ligeledes udvist beslutsomhed med hensyn til målsætningerne i ønsket om, at også regeringerne vil udvise politisk vilje.
As regards methods, we feel that closer cooperation with the European Parliament, to which you referred, should be backed up by firm commitments regarding the timetable that could be set for this cooperation on the programme.
Jeg kan ikke gå i detaljer, jeg må holde mig til et par bemærkninger, der først og fremmest drejer sig om målsætninger ne.
Similarly, with improvement of the Commission's management, we would be interested in being involved, but only as long as we ensure that working with the European Parliament does not hamper or delay the Commission's work.
Har De tænkt over, hvilket svar der skal gives på et eventuelt afslag fra regeringernes side, et svar, der må være så spektakulært, at Europas borgere bliver klar over, at deres ansvarlige politikere på trods af deres taler i realiteten ikke ønsker noget Europa, eftersom de ikke vil gøre noget for at opbygge det?
VEIL (LDR). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, if I may address a comment to you, Mr President of the Commission, I imagine that you are not accustomed to having your speeches before this House greeted with such sustained applause as we heard this morning, and from so many parts of the Chamber.
Vi tilslutter os naturligvis Deres understregning af nødvendigheden af at udvikle forskningen, da dette altid har været prioriteret højt af vores gruppe, men
Speaking on behalf of my own group, who were among those who gave you that reception, I would like you to know that our applause was intended as an expression of our support for the effort that the whole Commission has made to present a coherent overall set
Først og fremmest budgetproblemet.
What is going to be done about compensation to the Federal Republic of Germany?
Hr. formand, De har analyseret Fællesskabets finansielle situation med stor stringens og klarsynethed, men de foreslåede løsninger forekommer os i mange henseender vage og ofte upræcise.
Are not other countries also going to be demanding a 'green scale', or one of some other colour? Another thing that we should like to know, Mr President, is the position regarding funding of the Erasmus project.
De nye retningslinjer for den fælles landbrugspolitik er udtryk for valg af et stærkt konkurrencedygtigt landbrug, underlagt liberalismens hårde lov, d.v.s. konkurrencen, som ofte er skånselsløs.
In other words, and I conclude on this, what would happen if the governments did not agree to act on your proposals, which make up an integral whole?
Jeg erkender gerne, at dette valg svarer til en vis økonomisk kohærens. Men så burde det ledsages af et omfattende socialt perspektiv, som er fuldstændig fraværende på grund af manglen på tilstrækkelige finansielle mid ler.
Have you looked ahead to the spectacular reaction and the response that should greet any rejection by the governments, to ensure that all citizens of Europe realized that their political leaders, for all their speeches, were not committed to Europe, since they would not accept anything designed to further the European cause?
Nedsættelsen af medlemsstaternes opkrævningsgrundlag forekommer os blot at være et beroligende middel.
Your comments on the common agricultural policy also gave us cause for deep concern.
Bliver loftet for den procentsats af momsen, der går til fællesskabs budgettet, forhøjet og i hvilket omfang?
Granted, no one in this House seriously contests the need to restore order on those markets where there are surpluses.
Hvorfor har De ikke i dette kapitel i forbindelse med de nye egne indtægter nævnt afgiften på vegetabilske fedtstoffer, som Kommissionen meget modigt netop har foreslået med landbrugsprispakken?
But the measures that the Commission is recommending, which are reflected in the latest proposals for prices, will have the effect of further undermining the incomes of farmers in the Community.
Er De måske skeptisk med hensyn til, hvorvidt Rådet er besjælet af samme mod?
It is no longer a matter of just freezing official prices, which are often purely theoretical, but bringing down real prices by dismantling the intervention machinery.
Hvilken konkret løsning foreslår De med hen blik på, at Fællesskabet kan genvinde en reel finansiel selvstændighed, som ikke sikres af de nuværende egne indtægter som De selv korrekt har fremført?
Moreover, our shortfall crops which enjoy little protection from imports — I refer to oilseeds and protein crops — are hit just as hard as those in which we have surpluses, the effect of which will be to deprive farmers in the Community of the opportunities for switching to alter native forms of production that the Green Paper had opened up.
Vi ville gerne have flere præciseringer fra Deres side angående alle de nævnte punkter. Og hvad forstår De ved den »grønne nøgle« til løsning af problemet med den britiske udligningsordning?
PASTY (RDE). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the programme that the President of the Commission presented to us this morning on the three issues of most decisive importance to the future of the Community — future funding, reform of the CAP, reform of the structural funds — leaves us far from wholly satisfied and raises many questions in the minds of our group.
De har selv omtalt faren for, at der på medlemsstaternes regeringsplan vil blive ydet stærk pression for, at der træffes udligningsforanstaltninger, der vil føre til renationslisering af den fælles landbrugspolitik, som i øvrigt allerede er påbegyndt i en del lande.
The fact is, and you might as well admit it, that the line taken by the Commission has been dictated by budgetary considerations.
De påpeger faren, når De nævner nødvendigheden af at have en landbrugsindkomstpolitik på fællesskabs plan, men De afviser den straks ved så at sige at besværge skæbnen, men uden at fremføre særligt overbevisende argumenter.
Short of being able to raise enough new own resources to fund the new policies envisaged, a solution has been sought by placing a ceiling on the total amount of agricultural spending, to the detriment of the Community's future in the agrifoodstuffs sector.
Der er således en selvmodsigelse i Kommissionens målsætninger, som forekommer os skræmmende, og som sætter spørgsmålstegn ved gen nemførelsen af det indre marked i 1992.
Is it not obvious that this change of direction signals the end of the common agricultural policy as conceived in the 1960s, while references to the repeatedly flouted key principles of unity of the market, Community preference and financial solidarity are becoming emptier and emptier?
Hvordan forholder det sig med udligningen til fordel for Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland?
First the budget problem.
Vil andre stater ikke også gøre krav på denne »grønne nøgle « eller en nøgle af en anden farve? Vi vil også gerne have at vide, hr. kommissionsformand, hvordan det forholder sig med finansieringen af Erasmus-programmet.
Mr President, you gave a very rigorous and lucid analysis of the Community's financial situation, but the solutions proposed as the means of rectifying it seem to us in many respects vague and often imprecise.
For ligegyldigt hvilke bestræbelser der udfoldes, vil de ikke være på højde med det rejste problem, der ind drager planlægning og anvendelse af landdistrikterne på fællesskabsplan.
These new guidelines for the CAP reflect an option in favour of a highly competitive agriculture obeying the harsh laws of the free market, where competition is not always fair.
Begrebet integreret udviklingsprogram eller -operation burde ledsages af en større spredning af ansvaret i udfærdigelsen og gennemførelsen af disse integrerede operationer.
However, accepting that this is the case, there should be an accompanying large-scale programme of social measures, but that is totally lacking for want of adequate financial resources.
De perspektiver, De har udviklet for den fælles land brugspolitik, bekymrer os ligeledes meget.
The reference to a certain percentage of GNP being devoted to development of common policies certainly provides food for economic and political thought, but how will this affect the level of own resources in the budget?
Ingen her i Parlamentet betvivler seriøst nødvendigheden af at asanere overskudslagrene.
Reduction of the assessment costs currently collected by Member States seems to us to be no more than a palliative.
Men de foranstaltninger, som Kommissionen går ind for, og som kommer til udtryk i de seneste forslag til prisfastsættelse, vil betyde et yderligere angreb på fællesskabslandbrugernes indkomst.
Is the ceiling on VAT revenues ear marked for the Community budget going to be raised, and by how much?
Ikke blot fastfryses de officielle priser, der ofte er rent teoretiske, også en sænkning af de reelle priser tilstræbes gennem nedbrydningen af interventionsmekanismerne.
When discussing new own resources, why did you not mention the tax on oils and fats that the Commission has very courageously proposed with the farm prices package?
De må indrømme, at det i virkeligheden er budget mæssige årsager, de bestemmer Kommissionens holdning.
Is it because you are doubtful that the Council will show the same courage?
Da man ikke kan skaffe tilstrækkelige nye egne indtægter til at sikre finansieringen af de nye
Finally, what practical proposals do you have for restoring real financial autonomy to the Com munity, which its own resources as they stand currently do not afford it, as you yourself have correctly stated?
Men ud over procedureproblemerne rejser der sig et mere grundlæggende spørgsmål: Er styrkelsen af de strukturelle fondes aktion tilstrækkelig til at sikre økonomiernes og samfundenes kohærens, som er et af de vigtigste mål i den fælles akt?
What this means — and you yourself have pointed to the danger — is that Member States' governments are going to come under very heavy pressure to adopt compensatory measures amounting in practice to ^nationalization of the CAP, a process which, if we are going to be honest about it, has already started in a number of countries.
De er selv enig i, at dette blot er et enkelt element blandt mange andre.
You draw attention to the danger while speaking of the need to have a policy on farmers' incomes at Community level, but you
Det er på dette spørgsmål, som uden tvivl er udtryk for en fundamental selvmodsigelse, at vi afventer præcise og konkrete svar.
In other words, would you, in this eventuality, con sider tendering the Commission's collective resignation? tion?