natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vi har derfor — og det fremgår sikkert af protokol lerne — altid i erkendelse af immunitetens betydning stemt for, at der sættes en stopper for forsøgene på at begrænse Europa-Parlamentets arbejde udefra.
If you take the trouble to look closely at what actually will be ready, or nearly ready, by 1 January 1993, you will not find any serious justification for postponement in the progress of the standardization work — and I am referring to the remit-related standardization work, the socalled essential safety requirements of the Directive.
Det er op til os at træffe afgørelse derom, og derfor er de afgørelser, Parlamentets immunitetsudvalg har truffet, kloge.
A list from February last, which I have here, shows that, of the 174 standards which are to be drawn up, 99 will be finally adopted before the end of 1992.
Det har indset, at der gøres forsøg på at lamme enkelte medlemmer politisk.
Fifty-six will reach that stage during the course of 1993 and only 19 will be outstanding after 1 January 1994.
Det er særlig absurd i tilfældet Stamoulis. Hr. Stamoulis er givet ikke nogen ynder af vor gruppe, alligevel siger jeg helt klart, at der også her ses et misbrug fra myndighedernes side med henblik på at hindre Parlamentets arbejde og sparke hr. Stamoulis over skinnebenet.
In my letter I asked Mr Bangemann for a personal meeting before we were to appear here today and in order to seek a solution to the problems.
Hvor ofte er vi advokater ikke forpligtede til i vor mandants interesse at angribe staten og dens organer, nemlig hver gang, den ikke holder sig inden for lovens rammer!
He asked me to discuss the matter with his staff in the Commission and with the officials of the Directorate General.
Vi bliver nødt til at holde sammen, for at beskyldninger udefra hindres og afvises.
That is what I did, indeed with the backing of the committee, and I know what the possibilities are for a compromise.
Derfor er det i alle tre tilfælde i henhold til de omstændigheder, der er redegjort for, på sin plads at stemme for udvalgets betænkninger.
I therefore eagerly await what Mr Bangemann has to put before us, whether he will give effect to the idea he himself put to me in Strasbourg last month, namely a significant shortening of the time for which entry into force will be postponed.
For så vidt angår anmodningen om ophævelse af hr. Pannellas parlamentariske immunitet, mener vi, at medlemmets uafhængighed må beskyttes. Der er tale om en politikers kritik af en journalists handle måde.
I considered this postponement to be a matter of such gravity that I wrote a letter to Mr Bangemann at the end of January appealing for his understanding of our point of view and for cooperation in the search for an acceptable solution, for preference of course that contained in the position of the committee, namely that the debate of 1 January 1993 for entry into force be retained.
Forretningsordensudvalget og Parlamentet har altid gjort den opfattelse gældende, at journalisters frihed til at kritisere politikeres handlemåde bør nyde omfattende beskyttelse. Det samme må gøre sig gældende for politikeres frihed til at kritisere journalisters handlemåde.
I pointed out in the letter that, with the postponement of entry into force now proposed, the Community's rule-setting authorities were in my opinion sending out an entirely wrong political signal regarding the significance of the timeframe for completion of the internal market.
Der er ingen grund til, at repræsentanter for bestemte erhverv skulle have en særlig »bulle«, og i det foreliggende tilfælde kan de anvendte udtryk ikke siges at være hverken injurierende eller ærekrænkende. En avis kan være partisk eller ej.
This bowing before the forces of neo-protectionism, which focus attention on the shortterm difficulties arising from intensified competition rather than on the growth gains to be secured in the long term, is tantamount to filing a petition in bankruptcy.
Beskyldninger om partiskhed eller forsøg på at dreje et medies observans i en bestemt retning er ikke i sig selv ærekrænkende eller injurierende.
The doubt to which this will give rise regarding the completion of the market on schedule is an obvious danger to continued European integration and should be dispelled by anti-protectionist measures from the Commission.
Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet har derfor i det foreliggende tilfælde enstemmigt besluttet at anbefale ikke at imødekomme anmodningen om ophævelse af hr. Pannellas parlamentariske immunitet.
Mr Bangemann, we should be able to agree on and uphold a policy geared to free trade, which takes account of the concern for competitiveness and the environmental aspects simultaneously. taneously.
Der var desuden enighed i udvalget om at påpege, at det eventuelt ikke ville være nødvendigt at behandle så mange sager om anmodninger om ophævelse af et medlems parlamentariske immunitet, hvis Rådet i sin tid havde imødekommet Parlamentets henstilling om at gennemføre en mere stringent, ensartet og fuldstændig regulering af statutten for medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet.
I hope so, so that in the course of the evening we shall be able to work out new motions for amendments as a committee position and shall have the correct basis for the vote on Wednesday.
I så fald ville vi ikke til stadig hed se os nødsaget til at behandle anmodninger om ophævelse af parlamentarisk immunitet ud fra meget forskelligartede motiver, der dog alle afspejler situationer, der generelt set ikke burde give anledning til at indgive anmodninger om ophævelse af immunitet. tet.
If these hopes are not fulfilled, I think Parliament will be forced into a position in which we have to make full use of our powers, which may mean that we refer the matter back to committee for reexamination and possibly consider rejecting the present common position.
Vi går nu over til afstemning. (Ophævelse af immunitet forkastedes)
This will result in the loss, not only of the extended machinery Directive, but of everything that was adopted in 1989.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok. A3-68/91) af Gil-Robles for
Moreover I noted that the work of the standardization organizations was of a high level in technological and safety respects, reflecting clear progress on the part of the labour market forces towards improvements in
Forretningsordensudvalget — anbefaler jeg ligesom i den foregående sag at afvise anmodningen om ophævelse af det pågældende medlems parlamentariske immunitet.
It is so complicated and bureaucratic that even the experts don't quite understand it, especially as this paragraph speaks of manufacturers and it is unclear whether the lifting gear or rope manufacturers are meant. So we want this fifth paragraph to be scrapped.
spørgsmål og Industripolitik vedrørende fælles hold ning fastlagt af Rådet (dok.
Last but not least the transitional periods.
C3-11/91-SYN 233) med henblik på vedtagelse af Rådets direktiv om ændring af direktiv 89/392/EØF om indbyrdes til nærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om maskiner. ner.
The Council wants to give the thing more time, and we in Parliament want it wrapped up more quickly.
Formanden. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
Perhaps we can compromise, Commissioner, and agree on two years.
Vi går nu over til afstemning.
Perhaps Mr Christiansen can help here.
(Ophævelse af immunitet forkastedes)
At any rate our group would go along with this compromise of two years.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok.
With regard to the other motions for amendments in the committee's report on the common position, Mr Ban gemann, I will save my comments until I have heard what you have to say in the debate.
A3-67/91) af Gil-Robles for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet om anmodning om ophævelse af Marco Taradash's parlamentariske immunitet.
You must therefore reject my motion for an amendment. You say, however, that you can promise us that, by the end of the year when you will have looked very thoroughly into the matter, you will be able to present a proposal for a new machinery directive, or an updated version of this one.
Christiansen (S), ordfører. — Hr. formand, kære kolleger og næstformand i Kommissionen, hr. Bangemann.
BANGEMANN, Vice-President of the Commission. — (DE) Mr President, I am rather surprised especially by what Mr Christiansen says, because I had thought we had taken his and Parliament's doubts in this whole affair very seriously and had endeavoured to dispel them.
Jeg har det meget dårligt med hensyn til maskindirektivets ikrafttrædelsesudsættelse.
In the second item you say that, on the subject of old machines, used machines, you will, addressing a point raised by myself, certainly be doing more work.
Det er meget kedeligt og skuffende, at Kommissionen og Rådet har svigtet sine egne politiske mål om det indre markeds ikrafttræden den 1. januar 1993.
Unfortunately you know as little as the rapporteur about the situation on the market.
Det er også ubehageligt, at man nu undsiger den aftale, vi indgik med hinanden, da vi i juli 1989 færdigbehandlede maskindirektivet, og som sagde, at disse regler skulle træde i kraft 1. januar 1993.
You have begun an investigation which will be completed shortly. You will be going ahead with the work and will be presenting a proposal in the next few months.
Det er kun halvandet år siden, og nu kommer man og vil have os med til en ikrafttrædelseudsættelse på tre år, dvs. tre år, hvor man har lov til at anvende nationale standarder inden for eget territorium.
It will be fascinating to hear, Mr Bangemann, what you have to say to us today, almost one year later.
Vi vil i alle tilfælde afvise disse ny-protektionistiske tendenser, der optræder tydeligere og tydeligere, inden et EF-marked uden indre grænser endnu er trådt i kraft.
Parliament insisted that we withdraw that directive, arguing that these mobile machines had to be governed by the general directive.
Vi er opsat på at stå fast på dette synspunkt med hensyn til at afvikle de nationale fordeles mure og fra og med 1. januar 1993 at få skabt et fælles og åbent hjem memarked på 330 mio. EF-borgere alene reguleret af fælleshøje standarder, der skal garantere virksomhederne, arbejdstagerne og forbrugerne gode og sunde produkter.
In any case that was the view of Parliament, and so the Commission withdrew this special directive and is now proposing an addition to the general directive.
Vi ønsker, hr. Bangemann, i vort arbejde at leve op til kravene om klarhed og logisk sammen hæng.
If that has taken some time, it is because Parliament in its undoubtedly greater wisdom persuaded the Commission to its own view.
Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado (PPE), ordfører. — (ES) Hr. formand, jeg kan udtrykke mig endnu kortere vedrørende denne anmodning om ophævelse af par lamentarisk immunitet, eftersom situationen er grundlæggende den samme som i hr. Pannellas til fælde med den eneste forskel, at da hr. Taradash fremsatte de påklagede udtalelser, var han endnu ikke medlem af Parlamentet, men blot journalist.
FRIEDRICH (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, I'll start with some good news and some bad news.
I dette konkrete tilfælde drejer det sig ikke blot om at beskytte et parlamentsmedlems uafhængighed, men tillige enhver anden borgers uafhængighed i en lignende situation.
Secondly there are a few technical questions on which agreement will be reached later on the basis of practical experience, because we follow the tried and tested principle of simply defining our objective and leaving the question of how that is to be achieved technically, Mr Friedrich, to the standards organizations.
Formanden. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
We take our directive to the technical experts.
Lovgivning om maskiner
This is of concern to us all, and it is on this that I wish to speak.
Det er virkelig en falliterklæring med dette knæfald for ny-protektionistiske kræfter, som lægger mere vægt på de kortsigtede vanskeligheder i forbindelse med den skærpede konkurrence end på de tilstræbte vækstgevinster.
We therefore ask that the version of the first reading be reinstated, i.e. that in accordance with Amendment 6 the standard for ropes and rope ends must be at least five.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er indstilling ved andenbehandling (dok.
Here too we ask for a return to the old version, namely by deleting the text of Annex I, 4.1.2.4.
Christiansen terer hensynet til konkurrenceevnen og miljøaspekterne samtidig.
But if that isn't possible and you do need more time — all right, it's rather a pity, but please don't then accuse the Commission of dragging its feet.
Dermed er ikke bare udvidelsen af maskindirektivet faldet på gulvet, men også alt det, der blev vedtaget i 1989.
It isn't consistent with the common position, but I think in the last analysis that the Council will take heed of these reservations.
Hr. Bangemann, vi burde kunne finde hinanden her i dag i et kompromis, der tilsigter en maksimal opbyggelse af et EF uden indre grænser fra og med 1. januar 1993 og de nødvendige mod reaktioner over for de ikke ubetydelige protektionistiske kræfter, først og fremmest i en del af de store medlemslande.
And I must thank you, Mr Christiansen, for setting my mind at ease, for it is the first time I've been labelled a protectionist: usually I'm called a 'sauvage libéral' in the context of free trade. So I am grateful to the rapporteur for recognizing that I am in fact a dyed-in-the-wool protectionist!
Endelig sagde jeg, at certifikation af maskindirektivets produkter kunne realiseres ved almen henvisning til direktivet.
But we shall be putting forward a proposal on that before the year-end, so that we can get this directive issued in time.
Hvad angår de øvrige ændringsforslag, hr. Bange mann, i udvalgets betænkning vedrørende den fælles holdning, vil jeg vente med mine kommentarer, indtil jeg har hørt Deres indlæg i debatten.
I hope Mr Christiansen will forgive me if I have been a little outspoken, but as the saying goes 'You reap what you sow'.
Jeg vil blot koncentrere mig om to citater fra Deres tale her i salen den 9. juli 1990, da vi første gang behandlede direktivforslaget.
I am very fond of open fields and the countryside, as places both for relaxation and organized discussion.
Det første lyder: »Når vi ikke nævner løfte- og hejseapparater, betyder det ikke, at vi vægrer os for at klare en delikat situation.
So I apologize if I have offended him, though I think it unlikely, because in stating his views as he has done he will certainly have expected the Commission to do likewise.
Så lad os blive fri for her i dag at få gentaget, at udsættelsen af maskindirektivets ikrafttrædelse skyl des, at standardiseringsarbejdet er væsentligt forsinket.
— anyone who does this can regard the single market as well and truly open for business when the directive comes into effect on 1 January 1993.
Hvis man gør sig den ulejlighed nærmere at undersøge, hvad der rent faktisk vil være færdigt eller næsten færdigt den 1. januar 1993, findes der ingen stærk begrundelse for udsættelsen i standardiseringsarbejdets fremskriden — og jeg taler om det mandatrelaterede standardiseringsarbejde, om de såkaldte væsentlige sikkerhedskrav i direktivet.
CHRISTIANSEN (S), rapporteur. — (DA) Mr President, I rise to speak in order to put Mr Bangemann right in a couple of areas.
Af en opgørelse fra sidst i februar i år, som jeg er i besiddelse af her, kan det ses, at af de 174 standarder, der skal fastlægges, vil 99 være endeligt vedtaget inden udgangen af 1992.
I see absolutely nothing wrong in the two of us shouting question and answer at one another and sounding a little vociferous.
56 vil nå dette niveau i løbet af 1993 og kun 19 mangle efter 1. januar 1994.
I do not think either of us in the kind of man to take offence. But I would correct you on one point, Mr Bangemann.
Det andet citat er følgende: »Med hensyn til de gamle maskiner, de brugte maskiner, skal vi, som hr. Christiansen rigtigt nævner, sikkert gøre noget mere.
No national rule can prevent him from regarding the single market as his market. We merely want to have a transitional period for firms in the Member States which still have stocks remaining at this time.
Vi har sat en undersøgelse i gang, som vil blive færdig inden for kort tid.
Manufacturing is carried on at present under national rules, which is perfectly normal, and so we shall have stocks.
Vi vil straks gå i gang med arbejdet og de næste måneder komme med et forslag.«
It isn't true that there are no safeguards in the Member States.
Det bliver spændende at høre, hr. Bangemann, hvad De siger til os i dag snart et år efter.
There are, though the level of protection varies.
I mit brev bad jeg hr. Bangemann om en personlig samtale, inden vi skulle stå her i dag og søge problemerne løst.
I am not here as a spokesman of the Socialist Group, but as a representative of the committee dealing with this matter in Parliament, I have dutifully reported on the conversations I had with you and for which I was given authority by the committee, and that idea you put to me that day, Mr Bangemann, concerned postponement for one year and three years.
Den fik jeg i Strasbourg sidste måned, og jeg siger mange tak herfor.
The discussions I had with your staff after various soundings centred on two years and two years.
Hr. Bange mann — det vil jeg gerne rose ham for — var lydhør og indstillet på et kompromis og bad mig samarbejde med hans kabinet og generaldirektoratets embedsmænd herom.
And I gave no assurance — I had no authority to do so from my committee — that I would accept anything at all other than what you indicated to me as an idea in Strasbourg last month.
Det sidste har jeg gjort, også efter mandat fra udvalget, og jeg kender mulighederne for kompromis.
I should like to correct that here and now, for it is this evening that we must try to reach a compromise.
Friedrich (PPE). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg begynder med en god og med en dårlig nyhed.
I think we should be quite clear that it is not you, Mr Bangemann, who is to table this motion.
Den gode nyhed er, at jeg ikke agter at udnytte hele min taletid.
It is our committee in Parliament. And we will not tolerate this postponement.
De kan heraf se, hvilke detaljer vi også er nødt til at beskæftige os med.
I am prepared to suggest two years, I have already said so to the rapporteur.
Jeg håber det, således at vi løbet af aftenen er i stand til at udarbejde nye ændringsforslag som udvalgets indstilling, og vi har det rette grundlag for afstemningen på onsdag.
Mr Bangemann, you surely remember, when we last discussed the machinery Directive, that we jointly rejected a German proposal to have this directive launched in such a way that it would only come into force as the technical standards were drawn up.
Opfyldes disse forhåbninger ikke, så tror jeg, at Parlamentet er blevet tvunget derhen,
We agreed that we — the Commission and Parliament — could not tolerate an internal market on those lines.
Men en ting forstår alle: Vi vil have en høj sikkerhed også inden for tekniske normer.
I stand by what I have just said: two years is a compromise I can live with if Parliament can too.
Dette aspekt optager os alle, og om dette aspekt vil
In this way we can get the matter wound up by the end of this week.
At det nu har varet lidt længere, skyldes, at Parlamentet i sin ubetvivlelige større visdom har overbevist Kommissionen om, hvad der var bedst.
I will outline the matter briefly, Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, concentrating on two aspects. Firstly, the principle.
Men når det forholder sig således, finder vi det temmelig overraskende, at det bebrejdes os, at vi fulgte Parlamentets vise råd.
It meets essential concerns, namely that that new output levels should be matched by very considerable reductions in fuel consumption of some 5 to 7 % a year, representing in tonnes of oil-equivalent a saving of 7.5 to 10 million t.o.e. a year.
For det andet er der et par tekniske spørgsmål, som man bagefter kan blive enig om i praksis, for vi følger det princip, der har stået sin prøve, at vi kun fastslår, hvad der er vort mål, og spørgsmålet om, hvorledes det teknisk skal gøres, hr. Friedrich, over lader vi til standardiseringsorganisationerne.
And a decision needs to be taken since the average useful life of these appliances is 10 to 20 years, which means that the full effects of the proposed directive will be felt in the year 2010.
Fagfolkene der skal tage sig af disse spørgsmål.
Then, in environmental terms, we have to bear in mind that the levels of C02emitted are expected by the
Jeg henviser til vore ændringsforslag nr. 6 og 7. I den oprindelige udgave stod der, at driftskoefficienten skal være bedre end fem.
The extra cost to the consumer will thus be offset by the fact that boilers will be more compact in size, and we are thus moving in the right direction here.
Det er jo nu en gang således, at jo højere tallene er, desto højere er sikkerhedsstandarden.
Elsewhere, regarding ways and means, I shall no doubt be more critical.
Vi opstiller et mål, der skal beskrives teknisk, og teknikerne skal udvikle de relevante instrumenter.
I realize that, I only introduced it because I had understood from our talks that we thought it would be helpful for the Commission to make a compromise proposal.
At det af og til er uforståeligt for ikke-teknikere og også for jurister, som normalt kan klare sådanne lovtekster, skyldes, at dette emne i høj grad er teknisk og derfor ikke kan behandles på anden måde.
I have already said that it is a compromise between our two positions; you wanted one year, we wanted three years, and so two, as the exact arithmetical mean, is a compromise.
Det forholder sig lige sådan med ændringsforslag nr. 7.
So I hope we can agree, because it won't help your position in the slightest either if we now have to wait even longer or if you reject the common position.
Der drejer det sig om hejsekæder, og der er den fastsatte standard fire. Vi ønsker imidlertid, at den skal være fire eller mere.
That serves no purpose, so perhaps you should try to reach agreement on this compromise proposal by the end of this week or, failing that, wait a month and refer the matter back to committee.
Efter hvad jeg har hørt, ser også alle europæiske fagkredse sådan på det.
I really do want to help us to achieve a result.
Det skal vi nok klare.
The vote will be taken on Wednesday at 5 p.m.
Endelig vil vi som kristelige demokrater stille endnu et tredje ændringsforslag.
It appears, in the proposal for a directive now before us, that the Commission favours the aim of saving energy and protecting the environment, which is thoroughly praiseworthy, but that the approach is different from the one obtaining at the time of directive 90/396 which I mentioned just now.
Også her drejer det sig om genindsættelse af den oprindelige ordlyd, nemlig at den passus, der står i bilag I, punkt 4.1.2.4., femte afsnit, udgår.
In effect we do not think it is Parliament's job to make the decision on a matter which is so very technical.
Den er så kompliceret og så bureaukratisk, at selv fagfolk ikke helt forstår den, navnlig da der i dette afsnit tales om fabrikanter, og man ikke ved, om det er fabrikanterne af hejseapparater eller fabrikanterne af hejsetov, der menes. Vi ønsker derfor, at dette femte afsnit udgår.
We may regret the difference in approach, but it is particularly hard for us to judge, from the criteria set by the Commission, which are the right technical measures to take.
Vi har blot fastsat en overgangsperiode — men ikke som neoprotektionister — for øvrigt vil jeg gerne sige Dem tak, hr. Christiansen, for De har øget min sjæls ro, det er nemlig første gang, jeg er blevet kaldt protektionist; ellers har folk altid kaldt mig en »sauvage liberal«, når der var tale om frihandel — jeg takker altså ordføreren, fordi han har indset, at jeg i virkeligheden er en udpræget sort protektionist.
We have to make sure that such inspections are adequately provided for, because there is no use wanting strict controls if these do not result in scientific certainty which is virtually absolute, though we know full well that there are no absolutes in this area. And limiting the field of application or devising quality labels naturally invites a number of comments which our committee has not failed to make.