natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I dag hører jeg kolleger og kommissæren fremsætte selv samme forslag igen som nye, interessante forslag, der henvises til.
It will result in some 5 m t less milk being produced, we hope, while at the same time saving on transport and storage costs: a saving of about 600 m ECU a year according to the Committee on Budget's calculations.
Europa er blevet skabt på den fælles landbrugspolitik, men De må også være klar over, at det løber risiko for at gå ned på den fælles landbrugspolitik; og De kan ikke tænke på enhedsmarkedet i 1992, på Luxembourg-kompromiset, på traktaten for en europæisk union med denne arv. med den situation, vi befinder os i.
But I have only agreed to this solution because it contains an exceptional ruling for the hill regions and because it also takes account of social, economic and ecological issues in general.
De må gøre Dem klart, at De påtager Dem et stort ansvar, og vi beder Dem — og jeg mener, at budgetudvalget har fremsat et meget seriøst forslag — standse op og diskutere sammen, Kommissionen, Rådet og Parlamentet, hvad man skal gøre.
The exception made for hill regions is entirely just and sensible, because farm ers there have no alternative and it is in our interest that farming is not abandoned in hill regions, because otherwise they would become depopulated.
Samtidig med at vi gennemfører de nødvendige for anstaltninger mod overskudsproduktionen også på de andre områder, hvor vi har overskud, skal vi have afviklet de eksisterende lagre.
At the same time as implementing the necessary arrangements to control surplus production, in other sectors where there are surpluses too, we must get the existing stocks wound down. This cannot be done too quickly.
Når vi så vover at gå ind for, at dette beløb til lagerrydning skal finansieres som ekstrabidrag fra de enekelte medlemslande, er det, fordi vi tror på, at denne investering så rigeligt vil forrente sig og penge ne hurtigt være i hus igen, når lagrene er væk.
The reason why we venture to suggest that this expenditure for stock clearance should be financed by special contributions from the individual Member States is that we believe this investment will pay rich dividends and that we shall soon have our money back, once the stocks are out of the way.
Og heller ikke på dette område er det tilstrækkeligt at tale om 5% mindre til mælk.
I have heard from the Commissioner responsible for agriculture that basically he too would like to take this road, for which I am grateful to him.
Men hvad betyder 5% mindre, når vi har andre overskud af alle andre pro dukter?
It remains to be hoped that the Council and the Commission will not weaken the provisions in favour of hill farmers and family undertakings.
Jeg er måske ikke så optimistisk at tro, at der kan blive enighed om dette i Rådet, men lad det være et politisk signal til Rådet om, at problemet er al vor ligt, og at der skal handles nu og her.
I am perhaps not so optimistic as to believe that the Council will be able to agree to this, but let it be a political signal to the Council that the problem is serious and must be dealt with here and now.
Vis, at det er os — undskyld, Ministerrådet, jeg havde nær taget Par lamentet med — der har magt og vilje til at styre tingene, og ikke tilfældighederne der styrer os.
Certainly it is we — sorry, Council of Ministers, I was about to include Parliament — who have the power and the will to control events, instead of letting events control us.
Der er brug for nytænkning, der er brug for handling.
There is a need for new thinking, there is a need for action.
Det er mit ønske, at dette må præge Rådets behandling, og det er mit forfængelige håb, at det også snart må gå op for landbrugsudvalget.
It is my wish that this may influence the Council's deliberations, and it is my forlorn hope that the Committee on Agriculture will also soon realize it.
Dette er essensen af de konklusioner, de to kommissærer nåede frem til.
Now the consequences are taking on incalculable pro portions.
Det er dén måde, man skal tilskynde folk til at producere mindre på: det er bevist med de valg, De har truffet hidtil, at det ikke nytte noget med kvoter, medansvarsafgift eller andre løsninger, for produktionen er steget alligevel.
It is, therefore, the same old way: they appreciate our political messages, as they have called them, but — I repeat — they choose to take a different road.
Maher (LDR). — (EN) Hr. formand, da jeg har så lidt tid, er jeg nødt til at begrænse mig til mælkesituationen.
MAHER (LDR). — Mr President, since I have so little time I must confine myself to the milk situation.
Der er ingen, i det mindste ikke i Parlamen tet, der stadig benægter, at der er presserende behov for to foranstaltninger.
Nobody, in this House at least, still denies that two measures are urgently needed.
Den ene er at forsøge at afsætte lagrene, så vidt vi kan gøre det, og den anden er at indføre foranstaltninger til at kontrollere produktionen. nen.
One is to try to dispose of the stocks, as far as we can do that, and the second is to introduce measures to control production.
Dette valg har vi bekræftet gennem betænkningerne om strukturerne og om forskningen.
Two and a half years ago I listened to proposals for reducing milk production, and for reducing storage.
Dette valg vil vi bekræfte i de kommende uger ved otte betænkninger, som kollegerne i fiskeriudvalget i øjeblikket er ved at udarbejde.
Today I have heard Members and the Commissioner putting forward these same proposals as new, interest ing proposals to be kept in mind.
Endelig er Kommissionen gået ind for dette valg i sine forslag til Rådet om en tredjegenerations fiskeripolitik. For Europa drejer det sig i alt væsentligt om at bevare beskæftigelsen for fiskerne og at udvikle aktiviteten ved de tolv medlemsstaters kyster.
We must, however, display a minimum of realism and a little more integrity vis-à-vis all the citizens of Europe: it is not enough to cut a bit of agricultural expenditure, or defend in an absurd way a state of affairs and a set of regulations that have led to this situation because, my dear Commissioner, when you burn, when you destroy, on your own responsibility and that of the Council, 18 million ECU a day in interest charges and the technical cost of storage, then you must subsequently account to all the citizens of Europe for this responsibility that has accumulated as a result of these regulations and these decisions that were taken in the past.
Jeg er bekymret over de bemærkninger, budgetudvalgets ordfører fremsatte her i formiddag, nemlig at »vi forsøgte ikke at skrive med små bogstaver«.
I am concerned by statements made this morning by the rapporteur for the Committee on Budgets who said, we did not attempt to write in any small print.
Det, der står med småt, er imidlertid i allerhøjeste grad vigtige.
The small print is exceedingly important.
I enhver aftale skal man læse det, der står med småt, hvis man gerne vil se, hvordan den vil fungere.
In any agree ment you must read the small print if you want to see how it is going to work.
I forbindelse med det, der står med småt vil jeg gerne rejse spørgsmålet om de nationale bidrag fra medlemsstaterne som hjælp til at oprette en fond til afsætning af lagrene.
In the context of the small print, I want to raise the question of national contributions from Member States to aid in creating a fund to help dispose of the stocks.
Hvis dette nationale bidrag skal baseres på produktionsmængden i en medlemsstat, kan det blive overordentlig uretfærdigt over for man ge lande.
If this national contribution is to be based on the scale of production inside a Member State, it could be exceedingly unfair to many countries.
Et land som f.eks. mit, Irland, har en lille befolkning, en svag økonomi, en stor landbrugssektor og — hvad værre er — en stor mejerisektor!
A country like my own, for instance, Ireland, has a small population, a weak economy, a large agricultural sector and — what is worse — a large dairy sector!
Tysk land er på den anden side et meget velstående land med en stor industriel basis og en relativ lille land brugssektor.
Germany, on the other hand, is a very wealthy country with a large industrial base and a relatively small agricultural sector.
Det samme gælder for den sags skyld Storbritannien.
The same is true of Britain, for that matter.
Vi bør være yderst omhyggelige med detaljene for ikke at overbebyrde de lande, der er svage. ge.
We have to be exceedingly careful about the small print in order not to overburden those countries that are weak.
Den budgetmæssige konklusion er meget enkel, hr. formand. Vi skal træffe beslutning om en bevilling, der giver mulighed for allerede i 1987 at indlede for nyelse og udvikling af europæisk fiskeris strukturer.
Europe has been built on the common agricultural policy, but you must also recognise that it is running the risk of foundering on the common agricultural policy; and you cannot even begin to think of a single market in '92, or the Luxembourg compromise, or the Treaty for European Union with this legacy and with the situation in which we find ourselves.
Jeg vil også gerne takke kommissær Cardoso e Cunha for hans aktive samarbejde med fiske riudvalget i forbindelse med udarbejdelsen af denne politik og for at have besøgt havnene for at mødes med søfolkene.
You must realise that you are assuming a very heavy responsibility, and we ask you — and I think that the Committee on Budgets has acted very correctly in this — we ask you to stop and discuss together — the Commission, the Council and Parliament — what is to be done.
Mit andet punkt vedrører nedsættelsen af kvotaerne.
My second point concerns lowering the quotas.
Jeg forstår, at Parlamentet vil uddistancere Kommissionen, der taler om en yderligere nedsættelse på 3%, hvorved hele nedsættelsen bliver 6%, mans Parlamentet taler om en nedsættelse på 5%.
I understand Parliament is going to outdistance the Commission which is talking about a further reduction of 3%, taking the total reduction to 6%, whereas Par liament is talking about a 5% reduction.
Hvordan det nu end forholder sig, er det afgørende spørgsmål : Bør vi insistere på, at denne nedsættelse skal anvendes over hele linjen på alle landmænd, eller bør man ikke kræve af de store landmænd, at de nedsætter produktionen mere end de små?
Be that as it may, the vital question is, should we insist that this reduction be applied across the board to all farmers or should the large farmers not be asked to reduce prod uction more than the small ones?
Når alt kommer til alt, skulle man jo, hvis man er en stor mælkeproducent, være i stand til at nedsætte produktionen lidt mere.
After all, if you are a large dairy farmer then you should be able to reduce production a bit more.
Mit sidste punkt er: Hvordan kan man få kvotaerne til at fungere?
My last point is, how can we make the quotas work?
De fungerer ikke for øjeblikket.
They are not working as it is.
Der er ikke megen nytte i at nedsætte, dem på papiret, hvis vi ikke kræver, at kvotaerne anvendes nøje ude på bedrifterne.
There is little good reducing them according to the book, if we do not insist that those quotas are applied strictly at the level of the farm.
Guermeur (RDE). — (FR) Hr. formand, budgettet er hverken et mål i sig selv eller et middel til at fælles skabsinstitutionen skal hutte sig igennem inden for de egne indtægters grænse, det vil sige momsloftet på
GUERMEUR (RDE). — (FR) Mr President, the budget is not an end in itself, nor is it a means of enabling the Community to rub along within the limits of its own resources, in other words within the means afforded to it by the 1.4% VAT ceiling.
På budgettet for 1987 er der to ting, der slår os: den ene, berettiget, går ud på at oprette en specialfond til afvikling af lagerbeholdningerne, der skal finansieres af medlemsstaterne;
This is the way to discourage production: it has been proved to you, with the alternatives that you have chosen in the past, that quotas, coresponsibility taxes or other solutions do not work, because production has increased just the same.
Devèze den anden forekommer os yderst uhensigtsmæssig og går ud på alene at lade landbrugerne bære udgifterne, der er fatale for deres eksistens til trods for at den kritiske situation, hvori de befinder sig, hovedsagelig skyldes det forhold, at de har fulgt den af Fællesskabet anbefalede politik: at producere mere og bedre for at sikre Fællesskabets selvforsyning med fødevarer og garantere landbrugerne en rimelig indkomst, de landbrugere der for at følge dene denne politik, måtte påtage sig store investeringer.
when the critical situation in which they find them selves is largely the result of having applied the policy advocated by the Community, a policy of producing greater quantities more efficiently so as to make the Community self-sufficient in food and to secure decent incomes for its farmers, who have had to invest heavily in order to put this policy into practice.
En række lande har accepteret medansvarsafgiften, selv om den måde, hvorpå den bruges, har fordrejer den i forhold til dens formål.
Parliament made its choice when it unanimously adopted the framework report that I presented in December 1985.
Man bør hurtigst muligt se at komme ud af denne situation, der er skadelig for alle — også for landbrugets producenter.
We have since confirmed this choice through the reports on structures, on research.
Alle implicerede parter bør gøre noget og ikke stå fast på ubrydelige positioner.
Over the weeks ahead, we shall be filling in the details in eight reports currently being drafted by colleagues on the Subcommittee on Fisheries.
Derved får man samtidig garanti for, at lagerbeholdningerne ikke genopstår.
Finally, the Commission has endorsed this choice with its proposals to the Council for a third-generation fisheries policy.
Det skal bemærkes, at forslaget for første gang ledsages af finansiel kompensation til nemlig stort set 0,12 ECU pr. liter ikke-produceret mælk.
What it amounts to in essence is that Europe needs to safe guard the jobs of fishermen and to develop activity around the coasts of the twelve countries of the Community. munity.
Hvad ønsker Kommissionen i grunden? At få det, som kommissær Mansholt foreslog, nemlig et malthusiansk landbrug, der bygger på et mindre antal landbrugere?
What exactly is the Commission seeking to do?
For blot at tage et eksempel, så vil 100 000 af Frankrigs mælkeproducenter i 1990 have indstillet enhver aktivitet.
In France, to take just one example, 100 000 of our milk producers will have ceased operations altogether by 1990.
Derfor fastslår vi med ef tertryk og overbevisning, at alene en europæisk solidaritetspolitik, der styres af sund sans — som at definere regioner, der ikke kan omstruktureres eller som er heldigt stillet, efter produktion, begyndende med de mælkeproducerende områder — kan sikre Fælles skabet en ligevægtig og rentabel landbrugsmæssig fremtid.
We therefore affirm our emphatic conviction that only a European policy of solidarity guided by good sense — along the lines of designating areas as not lending themselves to alternative forms of production or as having special status for certain forms of production, beginning with the dairy-farming areas — is capable of ensuring a balanced and worthwhile future for farming in the Community. munity.
Kommissionen og Rådet skal som omtalt af budget udvalgets formand opnå sideløbende reduktion af produktionen i New Zealand, Australien og De for enede Stater, altså en global indsats, og indførelse, som i Frankrig, af en afgift på importerede fedtstof fer.
And yet there are alternatives to quotas and co-responsibility levies on excess production. More emphasis needs to be put on the aids to consumption for which provision is made in the budget and especially on a dynamic export policy, concentrating on our traditional markets.
Andre løsninger end kvotaer og medansvarsafgifter på overskudsprodukterae eksisterer dog ellers.
It also means — inescapably — that we have to go beyond Community seas to fish in third-country waters.
Vi bør give en fortrinsstilling iti den støtte af forbruget, der omfattes af budgettet, og fremfor alt en dynamisk eksportpolitik, især til vore traditionelle kunder.
Finally, it means that we must intensify research and give the boost to aquaculture that it has been waiting for.
Det skal end videre nævnes, at det amerikanske marked er beskyttet, idet kun 2% af mælkebehovet tillades dækket ved import.
We must vote an appropriation sufficient to allow a start to be made in 1987 on renovating and develop ing European fisheries structures.
Det eneste optimistiske træk på dette budget udgøres af EUGFL, udviklingssektionen, der er forøget med 20% og vil muliggøre det for unge landmænd at etablere sig.
The only bright spot in this budget is the 20% increase in the EAGGF Guidance Section, helping young farm ers to set up in business.
Det er et punkt, der nøje bør følges, idet vi ikke må glemme, hvad det medfører.
This is something to be watched closely, since we must always look to the future.
Landbrugerne i de ugunstigst stillede egne skal have den uundværlige støtte, som de har krav på!
And farmers in the lessfavoured areas must be given the essentia! assistance due to them!
Dette landbrugsbudget for 1987 må ikke til syvende og sidst gå hen og blive synsbedrag.
This farm budget for 1987 must not turn out even tually to be a sleight-of-hand budget.
Kære kolleger, europæisk landbrug skal fremfor alt vedblive at være et familielandbrug, hvis vi ikke vil ødelægge vort Europa, der er så smukt på grund af sine strukturer, sine landskaber, sin forskelligartethed og befolkningernes karakterrigdom.
Most important of all, ladies and gentlemen, is that family farming must remain the backbone of European agriculture, to ensure that we do not disfigure rural Europe, which derives its great beauty from its structures, its countryside, its diversity and the depth of character of its communities.
Nielsen, Brøndlund (LDR). — Hr. formand, det er ikke Parlamentets opgave at blande sig i dispositionerne omkring de obligatoriske udgifter.
Finally, I invite Parliament to adopt the appropriations that we are proposing and the Council to keep to the fisheries budget voted tomorrow.
Men som en tanke til overvejelse vil jeg gerne sige, at jeg synes, det er en brugbar idé at etablere en fond med henblik på at få lagrene afskaffet.
DEVEZE (DR). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the problems of agriculture, and the surpluses in particular, lie at the heart of these budget discussions and outweigh all other considerations.
For disse lagre er et pro blem, og vi bør gøre noget for at blive dem kvit. på tilsvarende måde som en helt uforpligtende tanke til overvejelse er jeg indforstået med, at man som en slags signal, som det har været sagt, under de kom mende prisforhandlinger foreslår en nedsættelse af den samlede mælkekvote med 5%.
We are struck by two things in this 1987 budget: one is the legitimate aim of reducing the agricultural surpluses, the main means towards which being financial contributions from Member States to a special fund for the disposal of stocks; the second, which we find particularly inappropriate, is the idea of making the farmers alone bear costs that will put them out of business,
Debatisse (PPE). — (FR) Hr. formand, hr. kommissær, det var den fælles landbrugspolitiks mål at sikre landbrugerne en anstændig og passende indkomst.
DEBATISSE (PPE). — (FR) Mr President, Mr Commissioner, the purpose of the common agricultural policy was to secure a fair and decent standard of living for farmers.
Igennem en årrække har de voksende lagre imidlertid medført fastfrysning af landbrugets produktionspriser.
Over the past few years, the accumulation of stocks has meant that agricultural producer prices have been frozen.
De store beholdninger af smør, mælkepulver, kød og korn og udgifterne til oplagring deraf vejer tungt til på Fællesskabets budget.
The large stocks of butter, dried milk, meat and cereals and the cost of storing them represent a heavy burden on the Community budget.
Det giver et dårligt klima, selv mellem Parlamentets medlemmer; det fordrejer forhandlingerne og er til skade for det klarsyn, som overvejelserne af en revision af den fælles landbrugspolitik kræver.
This has created a bad atmosphere, even among us parliamentarians; it is distorting debate and undermining the calm that should prevail so that adaptation of the common agricultural policy can be given serious consideration.
Jeg vil imidlertid gøre opmærksom på, at landbrugets producenter så tidligt som i 1974
I should like to remind the House at this stage that it was as long ago as 1974 that
gettet. Jeg kan ikke forstå det, og jeg henviser til de bemærkninger, der knytter sig til forslag til ændring nr. 739, der sigter på en social landbrugspolitik, og som jeg i øvrigt synes er temmelig forvirret.
In a number of countries, they accepted the coresponsibility levy, even though it has not been used in practice for the exact purpose for which it was intended.
Jeg spørger Dem i Europa-Parlamentet: Er det politisk troværdighed, når Parlamentet for få måneder siden med Vazquez Fouz-betænkningen med stort flertal vedtog, at et forskningsporojekt til 27 mio ECU over fem år er det absolutte minimum af, hvad man har brug for til overhovedet at føre en fornuftig politik her?
Otherwise I will use my all too short speaking time to express my surprise that the Danish Social Democrats — Mr Fich, at least — use every opportunity back home to warn against conceding influence to the European Parliament — we saw that most recently in the referendum — yet here take part in a project to legislate through the budget on matters of detail with very farreaching effects in areas of principle.
Fich (S). — Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne fremsætte en personlig bemærkning, idet hr. Brøndlund Nielsen netop angreb mig personligt.
FICH (S). — (DA) Mr President, I should like to make a personal comment, as Mr Brøndlund Nielsen has just attacked me personally.
Tillad mig derfor at sige følgende: Det, at vi her i Parlamentet udnytter de rettigheder, som er Parlamentet givet, har intet at gøre med det, som hr. Brøndlund Nielsen angreb os for, nemlig for at udvide Parlamentets rettigheder.
Permit me to say the following: the fact that we make use here in Parliament of the prerogatives given to Parliament has nothing to do with what Mr Brøndlund Nielsen has attacked us for, namely extending Parliament's prerogatives.
Noget sådant er danske socialdemokreter som be kendt imod.
It is well known that the Danish Social Democrats are opposed to that.
Den knappe afstemningssituation i budgetudvalget giver mig mod til at intervenere, således som jeg her har gjort, og håb om, at vi under afstemningen i morgen dog får noget anstændigt op at stå.
There will thus be the simultaneous benefit of the secure knowledge that stocks will not be built up again. It is significant that, for the first time, this pro posal is accompanied by financial compensation for farmers, amounting to some 0.12 ECU, or about 80 centimes, per litre of milk not produced.
Formanden. — Hr. Fich, som De ved, fremsættes bemærkninger normalt ved forhandlingens slutning.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Fich, as you know, such remarks are normally made at the end of the debate.
Bring ikke formanden i vanskeligheder, for nu vil hr. Brøndlund Nielsen naturligvis straks have ordet.
Please do not make life difficult for the Chair, because of course Mr Nielsen now wants to say something immediately.
Kære kolleger, indstil fægtningen.
Mr Nielsen please do not pursue the argument.
De får nu ordet, men så er det slut.
I am allowing you to speak but that must be an end to it.
Nielsen, Brøndlund (LDR). — Hr. formand, hr. Fich talte om, hvad der er Parlamentets muligheder, som man udnytter.
NIELSEN BRØNDLUND (LDR). — (DA) Mr President, Mr Fich spoke of the prerogatives of Parliament which were being exercised.
Jeg har netop i min tale sagt, at det ikke er Parlamentets muligheder her at komme og jonglere med milliarder, som egentlig er obligatoriske udgifter.
I just said in my speech that it is not Parliament's prerogative to come here and juggle with billions which in fact fall under the heading of compulsory expenditure.