natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det forekommer mig derfor nødvendigt — hvis det, vi har fået oplyst, er korrekt — at hr. Marin forklarer sin holdning for Parlamentet.
I therefore consider it necessary, if what we are told is true, for Mr Marin to explain his attitude before Parliament.
Det skylder han alle vore kolleger.
He owes this to all our colleagues.
Jeg beklager overordentlig meget denne episode.
I deeply regret this incident.
Jeg har givet udtryk for min højagtelse for kommissær Marin.
I have expressed my esteem for Commissioner Marin.
Men den omstændighed, at han bringer nationalistiske elementer fra det 19. århundrede ind i diskussionen, viser klart: Manden har ikke forstand på Europa!
But the fact that he has introduced elements of nineteenth-century nation alism into the discussion clearly shows that the man understands nothing about Europe!
Og en mand, der ikke har forstand på Europa, skal ikke antage et europæisk hverv !
And a man who understands nothing about Europe should not assume European office!
Det er derfor på høje tid, at hr. Marin officielt giver Parlamentet en undskyldning for sine udtalelser.
So it is high time Mr Marin apologized officially before this Parliament for his state ments.
Arndt (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, mit første spørgsmål lyder: I henhold til hvilken artikel i forretningsordenen er disse indlæg fremsat?
ARNDT (S). — (DE) Mr President, first I would like to know on the basis of what Rule in our Rules of Procedure have these speakers just spoken?
De har tilladt disse indlæg.
You allowed them to speak.
Lige i starten, da hr. Toksvig talte, bad jeg om ordet.
Right at the beginning, when Mr Toksvig spoke, I asked to speak.
Men det er først nu blevet min tur som fjerde taler.
But I have had to take fourth turn.
Altså måtte de andre allerede tidligere have bedt om ordet.
That means the others must have indicated that they wished to speak earlier on.
Der er vel et eller andet her, der ikke stemmer, hr. formand!
There is something wrong here, Mr President!
Der er ingen artikel i forretningsordenen, der siger, at der kan behandles sådanne spørgsmål som indlæg til forretningsordenen.
There is no Rule in the Rules of Procedure that says that such questions can be discussed in a procedural debate.
Det slår jeg for det første fast.
That is my first point.
For det andet: Jeg har en fornemmelse af, at visse medlemmer af Parlamentet forsøger at give politiske personligheder mundkurv på. Det fremgår af den øjeblikkelige situation og de fremsatte udtalelser.
Secondly, looking at the present situation and what has been said, I feel that some Members of this House are trying to put a muzzle on political figures.
Der findes en ligevægt mellem Fællesskabets institutioner, som er fastsat af traktaten.
The Treaty establishes a balance between the Com munity institutions.
Den fastsætter, at Parlamentet skal føre kontrol med Kommissionen, hvilket ses af den kendsgerning, at vi har mulighed for med kvalificeret flertal at vedtage et mistillidsvotum til Kommissionen og tvinge den til at gå af, mens det modsatte ikke er tilfældet.
It provides that Parliament exercises supervisory powers over the Commission, as witness the fact that we can force the Commission to resign, by passing a motion of censure by a qualified majority, while it has no corresponding power against
Vi har institutioner, vi har Kommissionen, vi har medlemmerne af Kommissionen, vi har muligheder for at kritisere Kommissionens virke.
We have institutions, we have the Commission, we have members of the Commission, we have opportunities to criticize the Commission's activities.
Men man kan da ikke forbyde en kommissær at afgive politiske erklæringer.
But surely one cannot forbid a Commissioner to make political statements.
Han er da ikke med tiltrædelsen af sit hverv blevet en neutral personlighed, men er der imod fortsat politiker.
In assuming office he has surely not become neutral but has remained a politician.
I øvrigt passer det jo, hvad hr. Marin sagde.
For the rest, what Mr Marin said is probably true.
Det passer jo, at nogle spanske medlemmer i Parlamentet ikke har ladet sig lede af deres nationale over vejelser ved valget af formanden.
It is probably true that Spanish Members of this House were not guided by national considerations in the election of the President.
Ifølge traktaten er Kommissionen et organ med initiativ- og gennemførelsesbeføjelser.
The Commission is a body vested, as provided in the Treaty, with powers of initiative and executive powers.
Den skal dialogere med Parlamentet som sådant og med dets officielle repræsentanter.
It maintains dialogue with Parliament as such and with its official representatives.
Men som det netop er blevet sagt, er det indlysende, at en kommissær ikke kan kritisere et medlems politiske stillingtagen.
But it is out of the question, as has just been said, for a Commissioner to criticize a political view expressed by a Member.
Det er et angreb på hans udtryksfrihed og på selve den parlamentariske institution.
That is an affront to his freedom of expression, and to the parliamentary institution itself.
Som hr. Habsburg netop har fremført, er det ikke de europæiske parlamentsmedlemmers opgave at forsvare nationale egoismer, som hr. Marin synes at mene, tværtimod er det deres opgave at gøre fælles interesser gældende.
Moreover, as Mr von Habsburg has just said, Members of the European Parliament are not here to defend national self-interest, which is what Mr Marin seems to believe, but to ensure that our common interests prevail.
Af disse to årsager hvoraf den ene er af politisk og den anden af juridisk karakter, er hr. Marins hold ning ikke acceptabel, og Parlamentet skylder faktisk sig selv at afkræve ham en undskyldning.
For both these reasons, one political and the other legal, Mr Marin's attitude is inadmissible and it is only right that Parliament should ask for an apology.
At netop hr. Habsburg anklager hr. Marin for ikke at være europæer ... hr. Habsburg forsøger jo til stadig hed i Parlamentet at ødelægge de europæiske flertal.
For Mr Habsburg of all people to accuse Mr Marin of not being a European . . . But Mr Habsburg is con stantly trying to destroy the European majorities in this House.
Hr. Habsburg, De er ikke nogen europæer!
Mr Habsburg, it is you who are not a European!
De ødelægger principielt Parlamentets enhed !
You destroy the unanimity of this House on principle!
Det vil jeg lige for en gangs skyld slå fast her!
I want to make that clear here and now!
De har overhovedet ikke ret til at fælde dom over en anden europeuropæer, da De jo nemlig til stadighed forsøger at ødelægge de store flertal i Parlamentet og fremkalde en
You have no right whatsoever to pass judgment on other Europeans, for you are constantly trying to destroy the large majorities in this House and to pro voke conflict between right and left, which does no service to Europe.
(Bifald)
(Unrest)
Hr. formand, jeg stiller endnu en gang spørgsmålet til Dem: I henhold til hvilken bestemmelse i forretningsordenen er det muligt at fremdrage dette spørgsmål?
President liament for longer than I and you are chairman of a political group.
(Uro) man taler om en erklæring, han skulle have afgivet: det ville have været langt mere korrekt, om man hav de rejst spørgsmålet, når han var til stede i stedet for nu, hvor han ikke er her.
However, you have not been following our proceedings closely, or else you would not have put the question.
Jeg håber dog, hr. formand, at De vil tillade mig at præcise noget.
May I however, Mr President, take this opportunity to clarify a point.
I nogle indlæg har jeg hørt en vurdering af Kommissionens og kommissærernes rolle, som jeg ikke kan dele.
During several speeches I heard the role of the Commission and the Commissioners des cribed in a manner that I feel I cannot agree with.
Jeg mener ikke at være »EFansat«, som nogen har sagt.
I do not consider I am an 'employee of the Community', as was said.
Formanden. — Hr. Arndt, De havde ikke behøvet at gentage spørgsmålet for at få et svar fra mig.
Those colleagues who have spoken had asked for the floor to speak on points of order.
De har været medlem af Parlamentet længere end jeg, og De er formand for en politisk gruppe.
I refused to allow them to do so during Question Time and told them that I would give them the floor when Question Time was over.
Jeg mener, at Kommissionen og kommissærerne har ret til samme respekt og opmærksomhed, som vi viser Parlamentet og parlamentsmedlemmerne.
I believe that the Commission and the Commissioners have a right to the same respect and the same consideration that we accord to Parliament and its Members.
Vi er hverken tjenestemænd eller maskiner. Vi er politikere, og som sådanne har vi også vore ideer.
We are not employees, neither are we machines.
En af de grundlæggende er at tjene den europæiske en heds sag.
One of these — a fundamental one — is that we are in the service of the cause of European unity.
Jeg afsluttede officielt spørgetiden, og derefter gav jev ordet til dem, der havde anmodet om ordet til forretningsordenen.
I declared Question Time officially closed and then gave the floor to those Members who had asked to speak on points of order.
Selv om jeg ikke kender forretningsordenen så godt som De, mener jeg at vide, at den fast sætter, at ethvert medlem kan anmode om at få ordet til forretningsordenen.
The Rules of Procedure do provide, I believe — though I am not as thoroughly acquainted with them as you are — that any Member may ask for the floor to speak on a point of order.
Det har jeg rettet mig efter. Det var det tekniske svar, som jeg ville give Dem.
So all I did was to give them the floor.
Med hensyn til indholdet i debatten, skal jeg ikke tage parti.
As far as the substance of this discussion is concerned, I do not have to take any sides on that matter.
Jeg giver ordet til den sidste taler, hr. d'Ormesson, og derefter afgiver jeg et svar som formand på præsidiets vegne.
I shall give the floor to the last speaker, Mr d'Ormesson, and then I shall, as President, reply to the House on behalf of the Bureau.
Jeg er overbevist om, at hr. Marin vil få sig lejlighed til at forklare sig, og at Parlamentet vil få rig lejlighed til eventuelt at gennemføre en forhandling, der går ud over de grænser, der gælder for de såkaldte »indlæg til forretningsordenen«.
I believe, Mr President, that there will be no shortage of opportunities for Mr Marin to explain himself, and that there will be no shortage of opportunities for Parliament — if necessary — to hold a debate that goes beyond the limits of the so-called 'procedural motion'.
Her har jeg imidlertid villet understrege: for det første hvad vores rolle og funktion er; for det andet at vi har deltaget — og det sag de jeg også i den tale, jeg havde den ære at holde i forbindelse med valget af Parlamentets formand, sir Henry Plumb — i denne demokratiske ceremoni med al den respekt, der tilkommer selvsamme demokrati ske ceremoni.
At all events I wanted now to reaffirm, first of all, what our role and our function is; and secondly — as I said in the speech that it was my privilege to make on the occasion of President Plumb's election — that we have been present at this democratic ritual, showing all the respect that is its due.
Det udelukker naturligvis ikke, at vi ikke kan have ting på de politiske plan, vi foretrækker frem for andre.
That of course does not alter the fact that each one of us can also have personal pre ferences of a political nature.
D'Ormesson (DR). — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg har kendt hr. Habsburg i mange år. Jeg kender hans eksemplariske adfærd under anden verdenskrig.
D'ORMESSON (DR). — (FR) Mr President, I have known Mr von Habsburg for many years.
Jeg anmoder hr. Arndt om at trække sine ord om hr. Habsburg tilbage.
I invite Mr Arndt to withdraw what he said about him.
Dennes tilstedeværelse blandt os er en ære og en garanti for Parlamentets integritet med hensyn til det emne, vi drøfter, hr. formand.
His presence among us brings credit to this Parliament as a whole, as far as the subject under discussion is concerned, Mr President.
Når det er sagt, hr. formand, håber jeg inderligt, at hr. Marin, som her er blevet angrebet, mens han befandt sig langt væk, vil få lov til selv at tage stilling og til at forklare sin holdning.
Having said this, Mr President, I very much hope that Mr Marin, who has been attacked here whilst he is many miles away, will also be allowed to make his position clear and explain his own behaviour.
Det er klart, at hr. anuel Marin har overtrådt sin pligt til at udvise diskretion, og at han har fremsat be mærkninger, der ikke er forenelige med hans hverv.
It is clear that Mr Manuel Marin has failed in his duty of discretion, saying things incompatible with the position he holds.
Jeg selv blev engang udsat for et ubegrundet angreb fra et beitisk medlem af Kommissionen.
I myself was once the subject of an unfair attack by a British Member of the Commission.
Han udviste den redelighed bagefter at give mig en offentlig und skyldning.
He then behaved perfectly correctly, apologizing within the hour.
Jeg accepterede denne, og hændelsen var afsluttet.
I accepted his apologies and the matter ended there.
Vi kræver en offentlig undskyldning på vore spanske kollegers vegne.
We believe that the situation demands a public apology to our Spanish colleagues.
Arndt (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg stillede Dem det spørgsmål, efter hvilken bestemmelse i forretningsordenen disse indlæg er blevet tilladt.
ARNDT (S). — (DE) Mr President, I asked you according to what Rule of the Rules of Procedure this debate was permitted.
De sagde, at De ikke kender forretningsordenen så godt.
You said you did not know the Rules of Procedure that well.
Det er ikke tilstrækkeligt for mig.
That does not satisfy me.
Jeg vil gerne helt nøjagtigt have at vide af formanden, efter hvilken bestemmelse i forretningsordenen disse indlæg er blevet tilladt.
I expect a President to tell me precisely according to which Rule of the Rules of Procedure this debate was permitted.
Natali, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (IT) Hr. for mand, jeg må sige, at jeg har deltaget med en vis for legenhed i denne forhandling.
NATALI, Vice-President of the Commission. — (IT) Mr President, I have to say that I have listened to this debate with some embarrassment.
Der er blevet ret problem, som vedrører en af mine kolleger.
A problem has been raised regarding a colleague of ours.
Det burde slet ikke være nødvendigt at minde om, at Manuel Marin i løbet af de mangeårige forhandlinger mellem Spanien og Fællesskabet har bevist sit dybe europæis
It ought not even to be necessary to recall the way in which Man uel Marin demonstrated, during the long years of the negotiations between Spain and the Community, his deep dedication to Europe and his profound democratic feelings.
Jeg tror, at De kun hørt en del af mit svar.
I think that you heard only part of my reply.
Jeg sagde tidligere, at jeg ikke kender forretningsordenen så godt som De.
I did say that I was not as well versed in the Rules of Procedure as you are.
Jeg accepterer Deres erfaring, men ved
I have the greatest respect for your long experience, but on thinking it over I wonder whether perhaps I do not after all know the Rules as well as you do.
Jeg kan selvfølgelig ikke ændre hans beslutning, mendesuden vil sagen blive forelagt udvalget.
I am sticking to that and I take full responsibility for my decision.
Jeg har forklaret Dem hvornår og hvordan.
PRESIDENT. — Of course, Mr Arndt.
Jeg henviser til artikel 83 i forretningsordenen, ifølge hvilken ethvert medlem har ret til at anmode om ordet til bemærkninger til forretningsordenen.
The last occupant of the Chair said that he would refer the matter to the Bureau.
Det er, hvad De selv netop har gjort, og det er i henhold hertil, at jeg har givet Demordet.
That was his ruling and naturally I can not change it.
Coste Floret (RDE). — (FR) Jeg vil gerne anmode om, at man, hvis sagen forelægges udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender, stiller følgende spørgsmål: Er det lovligt, når en EF-institution eller EF-ansat kritiserer et parlamentarisk synspunkt, at Parlamentet så tager spørgsmålet til debat?
COSTE-FLORET (RDE). — (FR) If this matter is to be referred to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions, I for my part would like it to con sider the following question: is it legitimate, when a Community institution or an official of the Com munity criticizes a parliamentary vote, for Parliament to raise the matter in a debate?
Jeg skal svare Kommissionens næstformand, hr. Na tali, selv om jeg ikke tror, at nogen her havde til hen sigt at drage hans ord i tvivl.
I would further like to say, by way of reply to the Vice-President of the Commission, Mr Natali, that no one here, I think, had any intention of criticizing him.
Jeg vil dog også sige til ham, at såvel som alle andre ved også jeg, at der i Fællesskabet findes fire institutioner med hver sin rolle. Men jeg vil minde næstformanden i Kommissionen om, at parlamentet som institution har sine rettigheder, sine prærogativer, sin rolle og sine beføjelser, og at Kommissionen har sine, som ikke helt er de samme.
I know, like everyone else, that there are in the Com munity four institutions each witch its own role.
Redegørebe fra Rådet om det belgiske formand skab — Redegørelse fra Kommissionen om retnings linjerne for Kommissionens arbejde (fortsættelse)
Council statement on the work programme of the Belgian Presidency— Commission statement on the guide lines for the work of the Commission (continuation)
Angående det rejste spørgsmål, som flere kolleger har forelagt mig, ved jeg ikke, hvordan det forholder sig.
As for the question that has been raised, since several colleagues have asked about it, it seems to me that there are some aspects of it that are not too clear.
Jeg vil henvise det til præsidiet.
I shall refer the matter to the Bureau.
Jeg deltager i præsidiets møder, og jeg skal sørge for, at spørgsmålet bliver drøftet.
I attend the meetings of the Bureau and I will personally see to it that the matter is brought up and discussed.
Et officielt svar bliver givet af præsidiet i den ene eller den anden retning, og derefter får den pågældende kommissær uden tvivl mulighed for at give udtryk for sin mening her i salen, hvis han ønsker det.
The Bureau will give an official reply in favour of one side or the other and then no doubt the Commissioner concerned will, if he so desires, be given an opportunity to come before the House and make a statement.
FORSÆDE: RUI AMARAL
IN THE CHAIR: MR AMARAL
Ciancaglini (PPE). - (IT) Hr. formand, hr. rådsformand, det er med store forventninger vi hilser det kommende halvår med belgisk formandskab for Ministerrådet i overbevisning om, at dette land, der altid har været blandt de førende kræfter bag skabelsen af et Europa, vil kunne leve op til den komplekse polititiske og økonomiske situation i Det europæiske Fællesskab.
CIANCAGLINI (PPE). — (IT) Mr President, Mr President-of-the-Council, it is with hope that we greet the six months' period of office of the Belgian Presidency at the Council of Ministers of the Com munity, in the conviction that this country, which has always been one of the main protagonists in the con struction of Europe, will be equal to the complex pol itical and economic situation in which the European Community finds itself.
Især venter der det belgiske formandskab en historisk opgave, nemlig gennemførelsen — når først ratifikationsproceduren er tilendebragt — af den europæiske fælles akt.
In the first place, the Belgian Presidency will have a historic duty to perform — that of implementing, once the ratification procedures have been perfected, the European Single Act.
Arndt (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne stille forslag om, at udvalget om forretningsordenen får forelagt spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt man som indlæg til forretningsordenen kan sætte en eller anden udtalelse fra et medlem af en af Det europæiske Fælles skabs institutioner — altså Rådet, Kommissionen el ler Parlamentet — under debat i plenum.
ARNDT (S). — (DE) Mr President, I would like to move that the question whether any statement by a member of an institution of the European Community — i.e. the Council, the Commission or Parliament — can be put before the plenary for debate be referred to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure.
Jeg vil ger ne vide, om det er inden for rammerne af forretnings ordenen eller ej.
I would like to know whether that is provided in the Rules of Procedure or not.
Vi sætter vor lid til, at den europæiske fælles akt kan bidrage til en betydelig forbedring af beslutningsproceduren i Fællesskabet inden for rammerne af et reelt samarbejde mellem Parlamentet og Ministerrådet, som skal sætte os i stand til at iværksætte det med længsel ventede indre marked og en virkelig økonomisk og social kohærens i Fællesskabet.
Bound up with the European Single Act are our expectations and hopes for an appreciable improve ment in the Community's decision-making process, within a framework of positive cooperation between Parliament and the Council of Ministers which must make possible the implementation of the much hoped-for internal market, and the genuine economic and social cohesion of the Community.
En forøgelse og rationalisering af Fællesskabets finansielle ressourcer er uden tvivl et vanskeligt, men uomgængeligt nødvendigt mål, hvis man vil redde nogle af de fæl lesskabspolitikker fra undergang, som man føler et så
The expansion and rationalization of the Community's financial resources is undoubtedly an arduous objective, but it is an indispensable one if we want to rescue from asphyxiation so many Community policies that are urgently needed — industrial policy, policy for research, social policy, policy for the environment, agricultural policy and regional development policy.
Jeg kan tilføje, at der intet er til hinder for, at sagen også forelægges udvalget for forretningsordenen og for an dragender, hvis De ønsker det, hr. Arndt.
But the Committee on the Rules of Procedure is responsible for interpreting the Rules of Procedure and that is why I merely requested that this question be submitted to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and not just to the Bureau.
Og på dette punkt forventer vi også af Dem, hr. råds formand, at De viser større vilje til at drøfte budget spørgsmålene og især problemet vedrørende »maksimalsatsen «.
And at this point, Mr President-of-the-Council, we also expect you to be more readily disposed to a dialogue on budgetary questions and, in particular, the problem of the 'maximum rate'.
Pattersxon (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg tager or det som Parlamentets ordfører for gennemførelsen af programmet for det indre marked i 1992.
programme for the internal market by 1992.
En af mine opgaver er at overvåge gennemførelsen af hvidbogen.
One of my tasks is to monitor progress in the implementation of the White Paper.
Når jeg har sagt det, bør jeg måske understrege over for det nye belgiske formandskab, hvor enorm dets opgave er.
Having said that, I perhaps should impress upon the incoming Belgian Presidency the enormous task it has.
Under Det forenede Kongeriges formand skab blev der gennemført 48 foranstaltninger, en forøgelse af gennemførelsesprocenten fra ca. 50 til ca. 66%, hvad der følgelig er rekord.
Under the United Kingdom Presidency 48 measures were achieved, an increase in the success rate from about 50% to about 66% which is therefore a record.
Selv med denne tempoforøgelse mangler der ca. 50 forslag fra tidligere formandsperioder foruden de foranstaltninger, som det belgiske formandskab har ansvaret for under 1987-programmet.
Even with that acceleration, there is a backlog of some 50 proposals left over from previous presidencies in addition to the measures which the Belgian Presidency will be responsible for under the 1987 programme.
Så det vil interessere mig at høre rådsformanden fortælle om, hvilke planer han har om en fremskyndelse af processen.
So I will be interested to hear from the President-in-Office what plans he has for accelerating this progress.