natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Selv om vi alle lægger vægt på, at også postvæsenet underkastes det indre markeds regler; selv om vi alle ønsker at forbedre og at modemisere posttjenesterne, så et brev fra Bayern til Belgien når frem en smule hurtigere end i 1490, da Thum og Taxis' hestepost brugte fem dage til befordringen; selv om man ønsker konkurrence, bør man alligevel undgå en liberalisering, der vil medføre, at private skummer fløden ved at tage brevposten mellem de store byer.
We are all anxious to see the postal services too facing the challenge of the Single European Market. We all want to improve and modernize the postal services so that a letter sent from Bavaria to Brussels will reach its destination a bit quicker than it did in 1490 when delivery by the mounted messengers of the House of Thurn and Taxis took five days.
Her kunne de nemlig gøre gode forretninger på bekostning af den offentlige tjeneste, som ville komme til at sidde tilbage med den universelle tjenestes bekostelige rester.
Clearly, we want to introduce competition; but at the same time we must avoid a form of liberalization which would lead to private operators monopolizing mail services between the major centres.
Konsekvensen bliver en fordyrelse og betyder i sidste ende fare for, at man ikke kan opretholde en universel offentlig posttjeneste.
The consequence of this would be an increase in the cost of the universal service and ultimately threaten the maintenance of the universal public service.
I den vigtige betænkning, som Brian Simpson har udar bejdet, opfordres der til en række forbedringer inden for området og en vis tilpasning i forhold til etableringen af det indre marked — postforbindelsen mellem landene må for eksempel forbedres.
The important report prepared by Brian Simpson calls for a series of improvements in the sector and some adaptation to take account of the establishment of the single market — crossborder mail service must improve, for example.
Vi får lejlighed til senere at vende tilbage til de detaljerede forslag, som vi skal have forelagt.
We shall have an opportunity at a later date of examining the detailed proposals which are to be submitted to us.
Men i dag var det mig magtpåliggende at få defineret de generelle princip per, hvorpå vi mener, at Kommissionen bør basere sine detaljerede forslag.
However, I feel obliged at this time to clearly set out the general principles on which we believe the Commission should base its proposals.
Men der er én politisk detalje, der meget klart kommer til udtryk i betænkningen: vejen til fremskridt er ikke regelsanering eller liberalisering eller bare privatisering af vort offentlige postvæsen.
But the report makes one political point very clear: the way to improvement is not by a deregulation, a liberalization, or even a privatization of our public postal administrations.
Det kan forbedres — og i nogle lande er det mere nødvendigt end i andre — men det må ske ved hjælp af uddannelse og flere investeringer.
They can be improved — and some need more improve ment than others — but by better training and higher investment.
Her har Fællesskabet en rolle at spille.
The Community has a role to play here.
NEWMAN (S), skriftlig. — (EN) Det offentlige postvæsen i hele Fællesskabet må forsvares mod røveriske private profithajer. Regelsanering truer disse postvæsener.
NEWMAN (S), in writing. — The public postal services throughout the EC must be defended from the marauding private profiteers.
Europa har brug for et stærkt offentligt postvæsen, der ikke drives af en snæver gruppe af aktionærer, men af hele offentligheden.
Europe needs strong public postal services that are driven not by a narrow group of shareholders, but rather by the wider public.
Nogle af forslagene i Kommissionens grønbog kunne føre til et Europa på to niveauer, hvilket kunne bringe de principper i fare. som et effektivt postvæsen bør baseres på, nemlig at dets ydelser skal være til at betale og lettilgængelige.
Some of the proposals in the European Commission Green Paper could lead to a two-tier Europe which would jeopardise the principles of affordability and accessibility upon which effective postal services should be based.
Vore postkontorer spiller en afgørende rolle for hele offentligheden.
Our post offices play a vital role for all the public.
De må ikke sælges eller lukkes for at tækkes de doktrinære synspunkter hos tilhængere af et frit marked.
They must not be sold off or closed down to suit the doctrinaire views of free marketeers.
LULLING (PPE), skriftlig. — (FR) Jeg er glad for offentliggørelsen af Grønbogen om udvikling af det indre marked for posttjenester, især fordi den bidrager til at gøre en ende på en periode, hvor offentlige og private
LULLING (PPE), in writing. — (FR) I welcome the publication of the Green Paper on the development of single market in postal service, not least because it will help end the period of uncertainty among public and private operators on the scope of measures being envisaged by the Commission in that area.
Stort set erkendes nødvendigheden af et stærkt og effektivt offentligt postvæsen i grønbogen, men det anbefales, at direct mail og post mellem landene samt nye former for service tages ud af de såkaldte »monopoliserede
By and large, the Green Paper recognises the need for a strong, efficient, public postal service, but it does recommend that direct mail and cross border mail and new services are taken out of the socalled "reserved services", i.e. the area reserved for public postal administra tions.
Men dette har behov for at blive opretholdt som en afbalanceret, leve dygtig og omfattende posttjeneste.
However the public, postal service needs to be kept as a balanced, viable and comprehensive, universal service.
Grønt siges at være håbets farve, men de i det omfattende værk foreslåede løsninger hører snarere hjemme i død sannoncernes grå tristhed.
Green should be the colour of hope, whereas the options put forward in this lengthy document read more like the gloomy details of a death notice.
Det er faktisk budskabet om postvæsenets død, som Kommissionen forelægger os.
What the Commission has presented us with is advance notice of the demise of the public postal service.
Forslaget er af tre grunde uacceptabelt.
The document is unacceptable for three reasons.
NICHOLSON (PPE), skriftlig. — (EN) Grønbogen har korrekt peget på nogle områder, der giver anledning til bekymring, og som fortjener yderligere detaljeret under søgelse, både fra Parlamentet og fra de forskellige berørte parter.
NICHOLSON (PPE), in writing. — The Green Paper has correctly identified areas of concern which are deserving of further detailed scrutiny by both Parliament and the several interested parties.
Når man accepterer flertallet af de punkter, der er blevet taget op til overvejelse, sammen med analysen af det nuværende system, som den foreligger i beslutningsforslaget, så er det vigtigt for eksempel at understrege punkt 8. 9 og 12.
In accepting the majority of points reviewed together with the analysis of present systems set out in the motion for a resolution, it is important to stress, for example, paragraphs 8, 9 and 12.
Hvis man tager ordentligt fat på disse problemer, vil det bestemt skabe de bedste praktiske muligheder for at sikre, at hver borger har adgang til fuld offentlig service til en fornuftig pris.
These particular issues, if addressed properly, would surely offer the best practical means of ensuring that each citizen has access to a full universal service at reasonable cost.
Det er dårligt begrundet, da det bygger på den pseudoøkonomiske f'rihandelsdoktrin og det dertil hørende indre marked.
It is based on a false premise, i.e. the pseudo-economic doctrine of free trade and its corollary, the Single European Market.
Efter at have ofret jern- og kulindustrien, land bruget, kaldet »Det Grønne Europa«, selv om det afføder vrede og sort elendighed. Efter at have planlagt automobilindustriens bortgang i 1999 ved at udsætte den for japansk invasion, forbereder man nu færdiggørelsen af det ulykkessvangre værk ved at gå i lag med postsektorens 1,7 mio ansatte.
Having sacrificed the iron and steel industry, the coal industry and agriculture, what it calls "Green Europe" although all it will produce is anger and black misery; having laid the foundations for the disappearance of the automobile industry in 1999 by leaving it wide open to invasion from Japan, it is now getting ready to complete its evil design by turning on the 1,700,000 jobs in the postal sector.
Jeg vil gerne advare imod, at man haster frem mod en form for afbureaukratisering og/eller privatisering, fordi alle nationale postvæsener bør opmuntres til at nivellere opad, så man kan nå det nuværende høje niveau i Det Forenede Kongeriges postvæsen.
I would caution against any rush towards a form of deregulation and or privatization on the grounds that all national services should be encouraged to level upwards to match the existing high standards of the United Kingdom services.
Selv en delvis privatisering vil ikke garantere, at man når det grundlæggende mål, jeg har nævnt.
Even part-privatization would not guarantee attainment of the fundamental objective to which I have refereed.
Det henhører ikke under Fællesskabets kompetence.
The Community has no authority to do this.
Kommissionens teknokrater kender sikkert ikke betydningen af begrebet »offentlig tjeneste«, da de kun tjener pekuniære interesser.
The technocrats in the Commission who are only interested in the money they earn, clearly have no idea what the expression "public service" means.
Postvæsenet er imidlertid en offentlig tjeneste, og det er derfor rimeligt, at det kun delvis fungerer efter markedsreglerne. Dets organisation sorterer kun under de suveræne staters kompetence og ikke under »euroteknokraterne«.
The postal service is a public service and as such only partly operates in accord ance with the principles of the market.
Jeg tror, at man må tænke yderligere over idéen om et europæisk frimærke af helt andre grunde end de praktiske og økonomiske.
I believe that further thought must be given to the idea of a European postage stamp on grounds quite distinct from the economic and practical considerations.
Man må da tage den rige mangfoldighed af forskellige nationale frimærker med i betragtning?
Surely the rich diversity of individual national stamps must be taken into consideration?
RIBEIRO (CG), skriftlig. — (PT) 24 mia ECU, 1,3% af Fællesskabets BNP.
RIBEIRO (CG), in writing. — (PT) ECU 24 billion, about 1.3% of the Community's GDP.
Dette er det egentlige spørgsmål, som gemmer sig bag de store ord om liberalisering, modernisering og kritik af monopolerne.
This is what we are really talking about. Although we may dress it up in big words such as liberalization, modernization, rejection of monopolies.
Hvilken fristende udfordring!
What a tantalizing challenge!
Som ligger skjult i en argumentation, hvor den offentlige posttjeneste forvandles til det offentlige marked for posttjenester.
Which is dressed up in the argument that the public postal service should become the single market for postal services.
Man kan indvende, at postvæsenet varetager en række transnationale opgaver.
Some 1.3% of GDP clearly indicates the extent of the business.
For øvrigt overflødiggøres forslaget af Verdenspostunionens konvention af 1989, der skal revideres i 1994.
The only justification for this document is financial profit.
Det indre marked er faktisk intet andet end et af »eurolovgiverne« og lobbyerne benyttet påskud til at lægge deres klamme hånd på 1,33 % af EF's BNP, dvs. 26 mia ECU eller 200 mia FRF.
The "euro-regulators" and the lobbies are simply using the Single Market as an alibi to get their hands on 1.3% of Community GDP which amounts to 26 billion ecus or 200 billion francs.
Skidt med at det går ud over tusindvis af mennesker, hvis arbejdsplads trues, eller at visse borgere ikke får mulig hed for at bruge postvæsenet.
Who cares about the conse quences for the thousands of people whose jobs are at risk or that some Community citizens will be unable to use the postal services!
Når man ved, at hver borger i Fællesskabet gennemsnitligt modtager 260 postforsendelser om året, slår det for øvrigt dårligt definerede udtryk »universel tjeneste« ikke til.
Bearing in mind that in the Community each individual receives an average of 260 piece of mail a year, the idea of a universal postal service — a concept which, moreover, has not been clearly defined — is simply not enough.
1,3% af Fællesskabets PNB, det siger noget om forretningens omfang, der vil bidrage til at skille klinten fra hveden, dvs. det, der giver overkud, går til den private sektor, og det, der er tabsgivende, kan så enten gå til den omtalte offentlige tjeneste eller fjernes fra markedet.
And little or no account is taken of situations where postal services will reach the interior and the periphery only if the underlying philosophy is one of public service and not of profit.
Muligheden for nem kommunikation til en rimelig pris, det være sig pr. post eller tele, er en essentiel frihedsfaktor.
The ability to communicate easily and at reasonable cost by post or by telecommunication is part and parcel of individual freedom.
Derfor skal vi på dette område have en national tjeneste og ikke et marked — end ikke europæisk.
That is why what is needed here is a national postal service and not a market, albeit a European one.
Og lidet eller intet tæller det forhold, at posttjenesterne kun vil nå frem til de — også inden for de enkelte lande — perifert beliggende områder (Europas Alentejo-regio-ner), såfremt der i den fremherskende filosofi tages mere hensyn til aspektet offentlig tjenesteydelse end til privat vinding.
Thus, the Green Paper and, more particularly, the Simpson report are implicitly an obstacle in the way of this passion for privatization, this argumentative avidity for gain. People have been foiled in what they have been trying to achieve with sly and tendentious amendments.
A3­329/92) af Spencer for Udvalget om Eksterne Økonomiske Forbindelser om miljø og samhan­del
A3-0329/92) by Mr Spencer, on behalf of the Committee on External Economic Relations, on environ ment and trade personal insult when it is said that to have stood up for what one believes in is to have wasted the House's time.
A3­382/92) af Van Outrive for Udval­get om Borgerlige Frihedsrettigheder og Indre Anliggen­der om oprettelsen af EUROPOL
A3-0382/92) by Mr Van Outrive, on behalf of the Committee on Civil Liberties, and Internal Affairs, on the setting up of EUROPOL
VERBEEK (V). — (NL) Fru formand, hvis jeg har forstået det rigtigt, har hr. Spencer ikke selv været i salen under hele denne afstemning, mens han vel stadig var det lige før afstemningen.
VERBEEK (V). — (NE) Madam, if my eyes do not deceive me, Mr Spencer has not been in the House while the vote was in progress, although he was still here immediately prior to the vote.
Hans betænkning skulle dreje sig om miljø og samhandel, men den ser faktisk ud til at dreje sig om samhandel.
His report deals with environment and trade.
Ændringsforslagene fra hr. Melandri ville, hvis de var blevet vedtaget, have gjort denne beslutning til en rigtig miljø­ og samhandelsbeslutning.
Adoption of Mr Melandri's amendments would have turned this resolution into a genuine environment and trade resolution.
Parlamentet synes stadig ikke at have en virkelig økolo­gisk bevidsthed.
It would appear that this Parliament still does not possess a real environmental awareness.
Handelen er hellig, og så snart det bliver alvor med miljøet i lovgivningen, i økonomiske følger og omkostninger, så vendes alle tommelfingre nedad i salens brede midte.
Trade is sacred and as soon as environment is taken seriously in the legislative process, in economic costs and consequences, then the entire central area of the House gives the thumbs-down.
For Parlamentet, ligesom for GATT, er miljøarbejdet, som menneskets arbejde stadig er det på verdensplan, ikke partner på det liberale marked, altså punkt F i beslutningen.
For this Parliament, just as for GATT, the labour of the environ ment, as is still the case with human labour throughout the world, is not a plus point on the liberal market, as stated in consideration F of the resolution.
Man mener stadig at kunne redde miljøet ved økonomisk vækst, som det fremgår af punkt M.
People still think that the environment can be rescued by economic growth, as is apparent from consideration M.
Fru formand, hvis man vil have en økologisk økonomi, et økologisk marked, en økologisk handel må man også betale de fulde økologiske konsekvenser og den fulde økologiske kostpris.
Madam President, an environmental economy, market, trade will have to accept the full environmental conse quences and the full environmental cost.
Jeg vil også henvise til, at når den multilaterale .samhandelsorganisation (MTO) virkelig kommer som efterfølger for GATT, se punkt 5 i beslut­ningen, er der lukket for ethvert parlamentarisk demokra­ti, hvad verdenshandelen angår.
May I add that when the MTO effectively succeeds GATT, see paragraph 5 of the resolution, all parliamentary democracy regarding world trade is ruled out.
Så bliver EF­modellen uden et rigtigt seriøst Parlament så at sige et forbillede for hele verdenshandelsstrukturen.
The EC model without a real, serious Parliament will become the true model for the whole world trade structure.
Denne beslutning er absolut utilstrækkelig for miljøet, miljøet dør fortsat.
This resolution is totally inadequate for the environment, the environment will continue to die.
Christopher BEAZLEY (PPE). — (EN) Hr. formand, på grund af vedtagelsen af bestemte ændringsforslag vil min gruppe kunne stemme for hr. Van Outrives betænkning, og vi er glade for at kunne støtte den.
BEAZLEY, Christopher (PPE). — Mr President, because of the passing of specific amendments my group will be able to vote in favour of Mr Van Outrive's report, and we are happy to support it.
Men jeg vil henlede Parlamentets opmærksomhed på fru Scriveners reaktion i går på debatten, der var meget skuffende.
I would, however, draw Parliament's attention to Mrs Scrivener's response yes terday to the debate, which was extremely disappointing.
Hun syntes ikke at være enig med Parlamentet om, at der skulle ske nogen udvikling i retning af, at politisamarbejdet blev underlagt en ordentlig demokratisk parlamentarisk og juridisk kontrol under medvirken af Kommissionen.
She did not seem to agree with Parliament that there should be any evolution in the direction of police cooperation coming under democratic parliamentary control with recourse to the Court of Justice and Commission involvement.
Jeg vil gerne bede hende om at tænke over ændringsforslag nr. 7, der er blevet vedtaget, for det forekommer mig, at Kommissionen indtager en helt anden holdning i forhold til den fra sidste år, at dømme efter kommentarer fremsat af hr. Bangemann, der her til morgen er blevet bekræftet af, hvad kommissær Vanni d'Archirafi har sagt om ikke engang at gennemføre lovgivningen om det indre mar­ked.
I would ask her to reflect on Amendment No 7, which has been passed, because it seems that the Commission is taking a very different line from last year to judge by comments made by Commissioner Bangemann, which have been confirmed this morning by what Commissioner Vanni d'Archirafi has said about not even implementing single market legislation.
Jeg synes, Parlamentet bør være meget bekymret, hvis dette afspejler en ændret holdning fra Kommis­sionens side.
I think this House will be very concerned if this reflects change of heart in the Commission.
Jeg håber, kommissær Schmidhuber vil viderebringe vore synspunkter og følelser angående dette og vil være i stand til at komme tilbage i særdeleshed til Udvalget om Borgerlige Frihedsrettigheder og Indre Anliggender for at vise, at Kommissionen faktisk ser frem til en udvikling i retning af, at der gennemføres parlamentarisk kontrol på dette yderst vigtige område, ikke bare for vore institutio­ner, men for borgerne i Fællesskabet.
I hope Commissioner Schmidhuber will convey our views and our feelings on this and will be able to come back in particular to the Committee on Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs to show that the Commission does look forward to the evolution towards parliamentary control being implemented in this extremely important region, not just for our institution but for the citizens of the European Community.
WELSH (PPE). — (EN) Fru formand, til forretningsor­denen.
WELSH (PPE). — Madam President, on a point of order.
Jeg vil gerne fremsætte en personlig erklæring på vegne af min kollega, hr. Spencer.
I wish to make a personal statement on behalf of my colleague, Mr Spencer.
Hr. Verbeeks bemærk­ninger om hans tilstedeværelse var helt skandaløse.
Mr Verbeek's remarks about his attendance were quite disgraceful.
Jeg vil gerne underrette Parlamentet om, at hr. Spencer var her indtil omkring to minutter før afstemningen begynd­te.
I should inform the House that Mr Spencer was here until about two minutes before the vote started.
Så var han nødt til at tage af sted, fordi han skulle med bil til Frankfurt for at nå en flyvemaskine, så han kunne tage sig af et vigtigt personligt anliggende.
He then had to leave because he had to go by car to Frankfurt to get a plane to go on important personal business.
Det er ualmindelig modbydeligt, at især De Grønne skulle kommentere andre menneskers fremmøde, når de har haft held til at spilde ca. 20 minutter af Parlamentets tid her til formiddag.
For the Green Group, of all people, to make comments on other people's attendance is particularly heinous because they have succeeded in wasting the time of the House for about 20 minutes this morning.
Og hvis de og deres venner ikke havde anvendt denne taktik ugen igennem, ville ordføreren have kunnet være til stede.
And had they and their friends not employed this sort of tactics throughout the week, the rapporteur would have been able to be here.
Så jeg synes, det ville være passende med en undskyldning til hr. Spencer, og jeg må på det kraftigste misbillige hr. Verbeeks bemærkninger.
So I think an apology to Mr Spencer is in order, and I take grave exception to Mr Verbeek's remarks.
FRIEDRICH (PPE). — (DE) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, jeg stemmer for betænkningen, men uden større begejstring, for betænkningen giver udtryk for en umiskendelig og malplaceret mistro til politiet og til kriminalpolitiets teknisk optimale samarbejde på tværs af srænserne.
FRIEDRICH (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, although I shall be voting for this report, I shall do so without any great enthusiasm because of the clear and unjustified suspicion it expresses of the police and of the promotion of the closest transfrontier cooperation between the criminal investigation authorities that is technically possible. ible.
B3­40/93 og B3­1 10/93.
Are we not here to debate and to try to understand?
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
They use high technology and computers.
Kommissionen ikke skal have et vist ansvar, hvem skal så?
Debates of the European Parliament
Politiet fortjener vor fulde støtte, når det gælder borger nes beskyttelse, og det bør have de mest moderne eftersøgningsredskaber og bruge de mest moderne meto der.
The police deserve our support in protecting our citizens and they need the most modern investigation technology and the most up-to-date methods.
Jeg foretrækker faktisk den originale ordlyd i betænkningen, for vi ved endnu ikke, hvordan den europæiske ombudsmand vil komme til at fungere.
original wording in the report because we do not yet know how the operation of the European Ombudsman will work out.
Men det er af afgørende betydning at have ansvarlighed, og det er også helt nødvendigt, at der findes et uafhængigt organ, der kan se på funktionen og undersøge klager, for i de sidste tyve år har vi konstateret i Storbritannien, at dette er nødvendigt.
But it is essential to have proper accountability and it is also essential that there be an independent body able to review the operations and to investigate any complaints, because we have found in Britain over the last 20 years that this is necessary.