natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Formanden. — Hr. Duverger, for det første vil jeg gerne sige, at det ikke er hjemstedet, vi behandler nu, men derimod tilrettelæggelsen af Parlamentets arbejde og dets ejendomspolitik.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Duverger, I must point out first of all that we are not debating the seat, but considering the organization of Parliament's work and its building policy.
Hvad angår fantasifulde udlægninger af forretningsordenen, så er det vist ikke noget, som udelukkende forekommer i Europa-Parlamentet.
Are distinctions being made in this Parliament according to who is doing the tabling or are we all equal and subject to the same rules ?
Hvad angår de udtalelser, som den franske europa minister har fremsat, vil jeg gerne sige — og her tror jeg, at hele Parlamentet er enig med mig — at det glæder mig meget, at man har opdaget Strasbourg som arbejdssted, eftersom dette ikke var tilfældet, da Frankrig havde formandskabet.
As far as the remarks made by the Minister responsible for European Affairs in the French Government, I should point out, and I think the House will agree with me on this, that I was extremely surprised that she has discovered Strasbourg as a place of work because this was not the case when France was President-in-Office of the Council.
Jeg vil gerne henlede Deres opmærksomhed på ordlyden af forretningsordenens artikel 64, stk. 5: »Fremsættes der to eller flere
GLINNE (S). — (FR) Mr President, the document before us is called a compromise -— compromise No 1.1 wish to draw your attention to the wording of Rule 64(5) of the Rules of Procedure, which reads as follows: 'If two or more motions for resolutions are
Woltjer (S). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg forsøgte også i går på en lignende måde at stille et ændringsforslag for at erstatte denne tekst. Det blev nægtet.
PRAG (ED). — Mr President, it is crystal clear that the Bureau's so-called decision on buildings policy runs
Vi ville være et kønt forbillede, hvis vi tillod, at vort eget Præsidium manipulerede med os, kostede med os og lod hånt om vor klart tilkendegivne vilje!
Community with an effective, well-organized Parliament, above all, as this House knows, I am fot Europe.
Prag (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, det er krystalklart, at Præsidiets såkaldte afgørelse om Parlamentets ejendomspolitik er i modstrid med Parlamentets vilje, således som denne kommer til udtryk i beslut ningen fra januar 1989. Det gør den i flere henseender.
(Loud applause) counter to the will of this House as set out in Parliament's resolution of January 1989.
For det første er der i afgørelsen indføjet et krav om, at tolv ordinære mødeperioder skal afholdes i Strasbourg.
First it inserts a requirement for 12 ordinary part-sessions to be held in Strasbourg.
Et ændringsforslag herom blev kategorisk forkastet både i udvalget og på plenarmødet.
An amendment to this effect was decisively rejected in committee and in plenary.
For det andet opretholder afgørelsen spredningen af vore arbejdssteder og vort personale, ja øger den endog, hvorimod det i Parlamentets beslutning blev fastslået, at denne spredning bør reduceres.
Following the Prag report that means, as stated in Paragraph 9, that Parliament must provide all the necessary staff resources and infrastructure for plenary part-sessions and other meetings.
Desuden synes omkostningerne at være underordnet for de glade ødelande i Præsidiet.
Strasbourg was fixed as the place of plenary part-sessions while other meetings would be held in Brussels.
Jeg håber, at Budgetudvalget omhyggeligt vil overveje den foreslåede opskydning af mødesalene.
The Bureau's decision fulfils this requirement to the letter.
Præsidiet taler bestandig om kompromis, men Parlamentets betænkning fra 1989 var allerede et kompromis, der blev opnået ved en regulær procedure fra Parlamentets side.
The Bureau talks continually of compromise but the 1989 report of Parliament was already a compromise achieved through the due process of this Parliament.
Præsidiet har til opgave at udføre Parlamentets vilje og ikke at indgå yderligere kom promiser.
The Bureau's task is to carry out Parliament's will, not to compromise further.
Peters (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg taler på vegne af de medlemmer af Den Socialistiske Gruppe, der støtter Præsidiets velafbalancerede kompromis.
Paragraph 10 of the Prag report states that the facilities in Brussels must be expanded for the Members, their assistants and additional staff.
Vi går ikke ud fra, at det drejer sig om Parlamentets hjemsted, det drejer sig om Parlamentets arbejdssteder, og rette til at træffe afgørelse herom er blevet bekræftet af EF-Domstolen.
Paragraph 11 says that supplementary or extra part-sessions should be held in Brussels. That is also contained in the Bureau's decision.
Strasbourg er fastlagt som mødested for plenarmøderne, mens de øvrige møder holdes i Bruxelles.
Paragraph 13 stresses the great symbolic value of Strasbourg, which is why the Court of Justice decided that the plenary session is to be held there.
Præsidiets afgørelse opfylder dette krav til punkt og prikke.
The Bureau's decision says the same.
Ændringer i Parlamentets vilje kan kun foretages ved en regulær procedure fra Parlamentets side og ikke ved en vilkårlig afgørelse truffet af Præsidiet.
Changes in Parliament's will can be effected only by due process of this Parliament, not by arbitrary decision of the Bureau.
Der har ikke foreligger nogen regulær procedure.
There has been no due process.
Præsidiet har lavet reglerne, efterhånden som det skred frem. Det prøver at tromle os ned, og det på skandaløs vis.
The Bureau has been making up the rules as it went along.
Dets behandling af plenarforsamlingen er en skændsel og minder mere om en bananrepublik end om en demokratisk institution.
Its treatment of the plenary is a disgrace and more reminiscent of a banana dictatorship than a democratic institution.
I punkt 10 i Pragbetænkningen hedder det, at faciliteterne i Bruxelles skal udbygges af hensyn til Parlamentets medlemmer, deres medarbejdere og yderligere personale.
Now we have to ensure that the necessary conditions for complying with the Prag report are created in both places and in Luxembourg.
Det står skrevet i Præsidiets afgørelse. I punkt 11 siges det, at supplerende og ekstraordinære plenarmøder skal afholdes i Bruxelles.
In view of the enlargement of the European Community by two, three, four and then five Member States, these conditions include adequate hémicycles both in Brussels and Strasbourg, and the Bureau's decision covers that too.
Dette er indeholdt i Præsidiets afgørelse.
It is balanced and it is in line with the Prag report.
Ifølge punkt 13 skal Strasbourgs symbolske betydning tilgodeses og derfor har Domstolen henlagt plenarmøderne til Strasbourg.
A definitive decision is taken in the case of Brussels, negotiations are to be started in the case of Strasbourg.
Vi kan ikke fortsat lade os rangere omkring ligesom et gammelt damplokomotiv.
We cannot continue to be shunted around like an old steam locomotive.
I det lange løb må et effektivt og handlekraftigt Parlament være placeret i nærheden af de aktiviteter og den udøvende magt, som det skal kontrollere.
In the long run an efficient, effective Parliament must be close to the action and the executive which it has to control.
Jeg håber inderligt, at Parlamentet ikke er indstillet på at bortkaste de beskedne fremskridt, det havde for øje i sin betænkning fra 1989.
I sincerely hope this House is not prepared to throw away the moderate progress it envisaged through its 1989 report.
Med henblik på at finde et bredere grundlag for en aftale er jeg imidlertid rede til at
Howover, I am ready, in order to find a wider basis of agreement, to accept the amendments of Mrs Ceci and others.
Nu gælder det om at få skabt forudsætningerne for Pragbetænkningen begge steder samt i Luxembourg.
What kind of an example is it that we provide if we allow our own Bureau to manipulate us, to ride roughshod over us and flout our clearly expressed will ?
Strasbourg har en sådan symbolsk betydning for forsoningen mellem folkeslagene som Europas egentlige grundlag, at det identificeres med Parlamentet.
Finally, it does not move everything to Brussels. It merely provides in Brussels the buildings necessary to have there the offices which we in our January 1989 resolution decided we needed.
Den, der ønsker en sådan balance og en sådan ligevægt, den, der ønsker at gøre noget for fremtiden, må nødvendigvis bifalde dette kompromis. mis.
We must avoid simply switching one set of offices for another in Brussels and end up without enough to improve our working conditions there.
(Bifald) forudsætninger, at der indrettes tilstrækkelige møde sale såvel i Bruxelles som i Strasbourg, og det er det, det drejer sig om i Præsidiets afgørelse.
It is a question of balance, of improving working conditions in Brussels, but also of making it possible to hold the ordinary part-sessions in Strasbourg.
Den er velafbalanceret og stemmer overens med Prag betænkningen.
If Mr Prag now says we do not need a new hémicycle for that, I say: yes we do, for we are facing enlargement!
For Bruxelles's vedkommende træffes der en definitiv afgørelse, for Strasbourgs vedkommende pålægges der at forhandle.
The changes in Central and Eastern Europe show that these countries want to join us.
Derfor anmoder vi plenarforsamlingen om at bifalde kompromisæn dringsforslag nr. 1, hvorved Præsidiets velafbalancerede kompromis bekræftes.
We want them too, because we want a united Europe, which is why these new colleagues will be welcome in the future.
På den måde er der fare for, at en arkitekt har bestemt hjemstedet, når bygningerne først engang står der, for den tvang, det rent faktiske udøver, via realiteter, er jo som bekendt stærk.
When the Soviet Foreign Minister Shevardnadze was in Brussels recently, we presented his 10 points for German reunification to Parliament.
En del af Den Liberale og Demokratiske Gruppe og alle de franske liberale vil derfor stemme for denne afgørelse.
These points were discussed in the press, but not the fact that they were put before our Parliament.
Det skal bemærkes, at denne afgørelse respekterer Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 18. januar 1989 om Pragbetænkningen.
The press gave the impression that the minister had visited NATO and the Commission — not a word about Parliament!
Jeg hilser dette kompromis velkomment og bifalder det, fordi det er afbalanceret og — for det andet — også er fremtidsorienteret.
Last night, Mr President, the French Government threatened to block the fixing of seats for all Com munity agencies, such as the Trademark Office, until the Member States' governments fixed Strasbourg as the difinitive seat of the European Parliament.
Vi må ikke blot overveje, hvorledes vi kan forbedre arbejdsforholdene.
Their demand flouts the Treaties, which require the Member States' governments to fix a single seat for the institutions.
Ifølge Pragbetænkningen fra januar 1989 drejer det sig om at få tilvejebragt arbejdsbetingelser for Europa-Parlamentets medlemmer.
The Treaties envisage that the Parliament would be located in the same place as the Commission and the Council in order to be able to do our work efficiently.
Jeg er for Strasbourg — lad det være sagt med det samme.
We cannot permit ourselves to be intimidated in this way.
I øvrigt mener vi, at hr. Prags nuværende fortolkning af Pragbetænkningen modsiger ånden i denne betænkning.
Strasbourg is such a strong symbol of the reconciliation of nations as the real basis of Europe that it is identified with Parliament.
Vi tror, at det er politisk uklogt at drage én regering i særdeleshed og Rådet i almindelighed til ansvar på en så direkte måde som den, vi er vidner til.
So anyone who wants this balance and equilibrium, anyone who wants to do something for the future, must approve this compromise.
Det drejer sig om balance, om bedre arbejdsforhold i Bruxelles, men også om at muliggøre de normale plenarmøder i Strasbourg. Når nu vor kollega, hr. Prag siger, at vi ikke behøver nogen ny mødesal til dette formål, så siger jeg: Jo, for vi står foran en udvidelse! Forandringen i Mellem- og Østeuropa viser, at disse folkeslag ønsker at komme til os.
LACAZE (LDR). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, when a decision is voted unanimously by the President and Vice-Presidents of the Bureau, and when that decision is linked to an amendment from the Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen of the political groups in Parliament, we are dealing with a problem which, it seems to me, is being tackled in a spirit of concern for balance and, I may add, good sense.
Vi ønsker også at tage imod dem, fordi vi ønsker et forenet Europa, og derfor skal disse nye kolleger i fremtiden være velkomne iblandt os.
It is to be noted that this decision is in keeping with Parliament's Resolution of 18 January 1989 on the Prag report.
Den, der ønsker en balance mellem Bruxelles og Strasbourg, må derfor bifalde dette kompromis.
We consider it bad politics to make such a direct challenge as this on one government in particular and the Council in general.
Price (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, det uopsættelige beslutningsforslag søger et bredt grundlag for en aftale.
STAES (V). — (NL) Mr President, I can well understand that the great majority of the British Conservatives are backing Brussels.
Det søger ikke at eliminere Luxembourg, men blot at lade det antal kontorer, vi har brug for dér, stå åbent. Præsidiet kunne garantere, at det fortsat vil leje alle vore eksisterende kontorer i Luxembourg et godt stykke ud i fremtiden.
As always, they are supporting the British financial interests, which hold a sizable piece of the real estate sector in Brussels.
Endelig er der ikke efter beslutningsforslaget tale om at flytte alt til Bruxelles.
The majority of Christian Democrats have a similar motive in this debate.
Ifølge forslaget skal der blot i Bruxelles skaffes de bygninger, der er nødvendige, for at vi i denne by kan råde over de kontorer, som vi i vor beslutning fra januar 1989 konstaterede, at vi behøvede. Vi må undgå, at ét kontorkompleks blot udskiftes med et andet i Bruxelles, så det ikke ender med, at vi ikke har nok til at forbedre vore arbejdsforhold dér.
Even though it was Christ who drove the merchants from the temple, they know better than anyone how this whole affair has in fact everything to do with the interests of the Brussels Christian De mocratic financial circles, which are linked up with their bank, the BAC-COB, which, together with the Société Générale, with which half of Belgium and the Christian Democrats in particular are associated, has been playing a game of pure, unadulterated land speculation under the leadership of their extremely dubious figurehead and champion of land speculation through urban demolition, Belgium's ex-Prime Minister and former Minister of Defence Paul Van den Boeynants, in his capacity as chairman of the Brussels Fêtes...
Strasbourg har en sådan symbolsk betydning, at byen i dag identificeres med Europa.
PRICE (ED). — Mr President, the urgency motion seeks a broad basis of agreement.
Da den sovjetiske udenrigsminister Sjevardnadze for nogen tid siden var i Bruxelles, forelagde han i Europa-Parlamentet sine ti punkter vedrørende Tysklands genforening.
It does not seek to eliminate Strasbourg as a place of work but merely the Bureau's wish to initiate moves for a second and larger hémicycle here.
Disse punkter blev rigtignok omtalt i pres sen, men ikke den omstændighed, at dette skete i Europa-Parlamentet.
It does not seek to eliminate Luxembourg but only to leave open the number of offices we require there.
Hr. formand, i aftes truede den franske regering med at blokere fastlæggelsen af hjemstederne for alle EF-organer, f.eks. varemærkekontoret, så længe
... look at the plans and see whose signatures they bear, dear colleagues — Van den Boeynants, publicly accused
Price af byen, som skruer leveomkostningerne i byen vanvittigt op, og som intet har at gøre med hverken Europas, Belgiens, Bruxelles' eller endnu mindre med det europæiske demokratis interesser.
As a Belgian I speak out against this dirty game, which pulls down Brussels' loveliest quarters, which seeks to build Europe on the rubble of urban demolition, which sends the cost of living in the city sky-high and which has nothing to do with the interests of Europe or of Belgium or of Brussels — and even less with those of European democracy.
Jordspekulationen her i Strasbourg er også i fuld gang, og debatten må være transparant, og kendsgerningerne skal forelægges på en overskuelig måde.
Land speculation here in Strasbourg is also going full tilt, but there must be clarity in the debate and the facts must lie before us absolutely incontrovertibly.
Debatten bør være politisk i lyset af det fremtidige Europas seneste udvikling og Europas sydlige dels interesser og ikke drukne i Bruxelles' og Strasbourgs smålige og provinsagtige overbudspolitik.
The debate must be a political one in the context of the most recent developments in the Europe of tomorrow and the day after and in relation to the importance of the southern part of Europe, not drowned in a petty provincial bidding match between Brussels and Strasbourg. bourg.
Dette krav lader hånt om Traktaterne, der foreskriver medlemsstaternes regeringer at fastlægge et fælles hjemsted for institutionerne.
In that case I would say that the Treaties are unequivocal, that Article 77 of the ECSC Treaty and Article 216 of the EEC Treaty stipulate that the question of the seat — which no one can deny is at the heart of this debate — is a mattet to be resolved by common accord among the Member States.
Den har ingen legitim ret til at udøve tvang mod os på denne måde, og den søger at underminere et demokratisk valgt parlaments rettigheder.
Please allow one of your number to express a personal emotion : I defend the rights of the town where my mother was born and my grandparents lived !
Dette beslutningsforslag er særdeles rimeligt, således som det foreligger.
Let us make this the occasion for renewing the oath sworn in the year 842 by Charlemagne's grandsons Charles and Louis and their armies!
Hr. formand, jeg håber, at Parlamentet vil støtte beslutningsforslaget på dette grund lag.
The first known text in both Romance and Germanic languagues.
Pérez Royo (GUE). — (ES) Hr. formand, blot to ord om lokalepolitikken, der, som af grunde, der er indlysende for alle, er blevet et ømtåleligt, nærmest symbolsk, emne, med hele den negative byrde hvor med symboler ofte er behæftede.
PÉREZ ROYO (GUE). — (ES) Mr President, I only want to say a few words regarding the buildings policy which for obvious reasons has become a delicate and almost symbolic issue with all the negative connotations that the symbols have.
Jeg finder det ikke nødvendigt at komme nærmere ind på de grundlæggende betragtninger vedrørende det centrale spørgsmål i lokalepolitikken; men jeg vil minde om de hensyn, som i det mindste for mange af os var afgørende i den forrige valgperiode under afstemningen om Pragbetænkningen, dvs. nødvendigheden af, at Parlamentet utvetydigt tilkendegiver sin vilje til at tilvejebringe de midler, som sætter det i stand til at udøve sine funktioner på anstændig vis: Ikke blot dets nuværende begrænsede funktion, men især des uden de mere omfattende funktioner, som vil blive en følge af den institutionelle reform, som synes stadig mere påkrævet.
I do not think that it is necessary to underline the basic considerations regarding the focal point of the buildings policy but I would like to remind you of the anxieties, at least where most of us are concerned, that determined the vote on the Prag report during the last legislative period. That is to say, Parliament must clearly indicate its willingness to provide the means which it needs to satisfactorily carry out its functions, not only the present limited function but also primarily the much wider functions which will be a result of the institutional reform which seems more and more important every time.
Deres partifælle, hr. Simpson har spillet det spil længe nok, bl.a. gennem sin stilling i Kvæstorkollegiet indtil i dag. Flertallet af de kristelige demokrater på den anden side har et lignende motiv i denne forhandling.
Only then will the European soldiers whose blood, the invisible symbol of past sacrifice, was shed in the doorways of all the homes surrounding us and on every patch of land in the fields, meadows and gardens, only then will all those soldiers who fell in combat be able to rest in peace!
Det er indlysende, at Parlamentet ikke kan unddrage sig denne forpligtelse i lyset af medlemsstaternes åbenlyse manglende evne til at opfylde traktatforskrifterne om institutionens hjemsted.
It is obvious that this is a responsibility of Parliament which cannot be avoided in view of the fact that the Member States are clearly not capable of implementing the constitutional decision on Parliament's seat.
I tråd hermed har vi fundet det rigtigt under denne forhandling at støtte de kompromiser, som fru Ceci har fremsat på vor gruppes vegne.
Along these lines we felt that it was right to support in this present debate the points of the compromise by Mrs Cecci on behalf of our Group.
Det drejer sig om kompromiser, som efter vor mening er helt i overensstemmelse med både beslutningen i henhold til Pragbetænkningen, som jeg tidligere har omtalt, og med Præsidiets afgørelse om gennemførelse af samme.
We are referring to some aspects of the compromise, which in our opinion are perfectly coherent with the resolution of the Prag report, which I mentioned earlier, as well as with the decision adopted by the Bureau in order to implement the same.
Vi mener, at dette kompromis vil og bør kunne samle et stort flertal i Parlamentet, som dermed vil styrke sin anseelse i offentlighedens og over for de øvrige fællesskabsinstitutioner på et tidspunkt, som, indlysende for enhver, er af afgørende betydning for Fællesskabet.
We feel that on the basis of this compromise we could and should achieve a large majority vote of this Parliament which reinforces its prestige in public opinion and among the other institutions of the Community at the moment, as everybody knows, that is crucial for the Community project.
Gollnisch (DR). — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, jeg kunne tage spørgsmålet op set fra et juridisk synspunkt.
WURTZ (CG). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, when Strasbourg was chosen as the home of the Council of Europe and then of our Assembly, it was not on the basis of the number of offices it had to offer or the size of its hémicycle, but because of the symbolic significance of this town in European minds.
Gollnisch ingen, der er i tvivl om på dette sted — er spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt Strasbourg fortsat skal være vort arbejdssted eller ej.
WURTZ shoulder their responsibility in this matter, it is up to this House as a democratically elected House to regulate how it should operate in the interests of those who sit here.
Dette spørgsmål besvarer min gruppe enstemmigt, dvs. også vor flamske kollega, hvem jeg ønsker at yde min fulde anerkendelse, og uden tøven med et JA!
In January 1989 the House declared its position and I am seriously concerned that an attempt is now being made to undermine that decision without proper recourse to the House.
Tillad, at én af Deres egne giver udtryk for sin sindsbevægelse: Jeg forsvarer de rettigheder, der tilkommer den by, hvor min moder blev født, og hvor mine bedsteforældre henlevede deres liv!
The Bureau does not have the right to take decisions which effectually defeat the will of this House.
Er det ikke i betragtning af spørgsmålets vigtighed sørgeligt at konstatere den ostrakisme, der har ramt vor gruppe, og som endnu en gang har sejret over almenvellet?
It is vital that Parliament should be near the centre of where decisions are taken in the Community. We cannot go on with the present disastrous and wasteful approach.