natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(Bifald) distrikter. — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg støtter anmodningen om fornyet udvalgshenvisning.
BORGO (PPE). — (IT) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, we are asking for referral back to committee because the posture of the report is entirely different from that expressed in the opinion drawn up by our committee and whose draftsman is Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf.
Jeg er ord fører for en udtalelse til betænkningen om beskyttelse af bioteknologiske opfindelser, og som anført af hr. Borgo er problemet, at de retningslinjer, vi refererer til, er fra 1988.
I wish further to say that, should this request for referral be rejected, our committee has tabled an amendment, approved within the framework of Mr Graefe zu Baringdorf's opinion, seeking to reject the Commission's proposal.
Det er mig magtpåliggende, at der ikke skal herske forvirring på dette punkt, da den form for debat, der nu er indledt, kan risikere at bringe forstyrrelse i Parlamentets arbejde, hvilket ikke er hensigtsmæssigt i et parlament, der som vores arbejder efter demokratiske regler!
GRAEFE ZU BARINGDORF (V), draftsman for the opinion of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development. — (DE) Mr President, I support that request. I am the rapporteur for an opinion on the report on biotechnological inventions, and, as Mr Borgo has already explained, at issue is the fact that the directive to which we are referring dates back to 1988.
Formanden. — Fru Veil, jeg deler fuldt og helt Deres opfattelse, og hvis nogen ønsker at debattere denne sag yderligere, henstiller jeg, at de indgiver en anmodning om at få sagen behandlet under uopsættelig debat. ')
AMENDOLA (V). — (IT) Mr President, I wish to say very briefly that this motion for a resolution stems from a number of documents, among which a petition, and we have been talking about it for roughly a year now.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er fastsættelse af arbejdsplanen.
These documents are already in our possession, accompanied by an opinion from the Committee on Agriculture, which has thus pronounced on the subject.
Disse retningslinjer er substantielt for længst blevet overhalet af udviklingen.
Its substance is long since out of date.
De retlige aspekter er af yderst dårlig håndværksmæssig karakter og er des uden selvmodsigende.
From the technical legal point of view, it is shoddy and contradictory.
De er i modstrid med gældende bestemmelser i konventionen om europæisk patent.
It conflicts with current agreements under the European patent convention.
De tager ikke hensyn til de økonomiske, kulturelle, økologiske og sociale konsekvenser, der vil blive resultatet af en så vidtrækkende retningslinje.
It took no account of the economic, environmental and social effects that a directive as farreaching as that in question would produce.
Den egentlige årsag til anmodningen om hen visning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling var dog følgende forhold: Ordføreren, hr. Rothley, havde efter indgående drøftelser erklæret sig parat til at indføje et ændringsforslag om det såkaldte landbrugsprivilegium i sin betænkning.
The real reason for the request that it be referred back to committee was, however this : follow ing detailed discussion, the rapporteur, Mr Rothley, was prepared to table an amendment to his own report which would render what is known as the farmer's right an integral part of the report.
Landbrugsprivilegium betyder, at bønder over hele verden fastholder deres ret til at anvende sæden fra deres høst til dyrkning på deres egen bedrift eller resultaterne af dyreavl til videreavl.
That means that farmers throughout the world defend their right to be able to use again the culture produced from their own crops or stockbreeding for future cultivation or stock rearing.
Den hidtil gældende sortsbeskyttelse har udtrykkeligt stadfæstet denne regel.
Plant variety rights in force hitherto have expressly confirmed that right.
Forslaget til dagsorden for indeværende mødeperiode er omdelt.
CHANTERIE (PPE). — (NL) A point of order, Mr President.
Der er foretaget eller foreslået følgende ændringer i henhold til forretningsordenens artikel 73 og 74:
I have the Amendola report in front of me, and there is no mention of an opinion from the Agricultural Committee, at least not in the Dutch version.
Det nye forslag om patentering udelukker oven nævnte rettighed.
However, the directive, which is concerned with patenting, precludes that right.
Ordføreren, hr. Rothley, havde indføjet et ændringsforslag, der skulle bibeholde denne ret, men tog det kort før afstemningen i Retsudvalget tilbage.
The rapporteur, Mr Rothley, tabled an amendment designed to confirm the right but withdrew it shortly before the vote in the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights.
Betænkningen blev dernæst vedtaget med flertal, uden at den indeholder bestemmelsen om denne på verdensplan gældende ret for landmænd til at (gen)anvende deres egen høst.
The report was then adopted by a majority but fails to cover this international right of farmers to use the biological material they recover.
Vedrørende betænkning af Rothley (A3-0050/92).
COT (S). — (FR) Mr President, the Socialist Group wishes the Commission to make a statement, pursuant to Rule 56, on the situation in Algeria, as this is directly linked to a group of votes we took, during the last partsession, on the financial protocol with Algeria.
Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter har derfor anmodet om fornyet udvalgshenvisning af betænkningen med henblik på i et fælles undersøgelsesudvalg at drøfte fremgangsmåden og rækkevidden af tilbagetagningen af ændringsforslaget, og det er mit håb, at medlemmerne vil støtte denne anmodning.
For that reason, the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development has called for referral back to committee to enable the nature of the debate and the impact of withdrawing the amendment to be discussed in a joint meeting set up to clarify the situation. I hope that honourable Members will endorse that request.
(Henvisning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling vedtoges)
(Parliament voted to refer the matter back to commit tee)
Jeg anmoder Dem om, at lobbyisterne bliver nægtet adgang til dette område.
PRESIDENT. — I shall take up the matter with the Commission and let you know at once.
Disse dokumenter har allerede været genstand for en udtalelse fra Landbrugsudvalget, som således har udtalt sig.
This process began already with the transference of Question Time in relation to all Community institutions on Wednesday from 8.45 p.m. to 11.45 p.m.
Vi har behandlet det i lang tid, og denne afstemning er allerede blevet udsat i to mødeperioder.
KILLILEA (RDE). — Mr President, before we pass on to the next item I would ask you to exercise your duty as President of this Parliament.
Hidtil har Landbrugsudvalget ikke udtrykt nogen tvivl; nu i sidste øjeblik anmodes vi så om at udsætte afstemningen endnu en gang og forhandlingen om denne betænkning, som jeg mener er meget vigtig.
Outside in the lobby behind me there is a battalion of lobbyists all prepared to harass and intimidate Members of this House for the remaining part of this week.
Men udvalget har haft god tid til at fremsætte en udtalelse og stille ændringsforslag!
They may use the facilities of the House to circulate their points of view but they must allow Members of this House who want to have a conversation in the lobby to have that freedom.
I dag er der en risiko for, at Europa-Parlamentet endnu en gang udsætter sin udtalelse om dette sakrosankte emne, nemlig dyrenes rettigheder, således at man forsætter med at betragte dem som landbrugsprodukter, som det hedder i Traktaten.
Would you please have them removed forthwith from this position.
Ephremidis (CG). — (GR) Hr. formand, i en skrivelse stilet til Dem anmodede jeg om opførelse på denne mødeperiodes dagsorden af et emne, som vedrører ca. 90.000 arbejdstagere beskæftiget ved toldvæsenet og med toldarbejde, idet gennemførelsen af bestemmelserne vedrørende det indre marked bogstavelig talt overflødiggør deres erhverv og forårsager sociale problemer, problemer med forbindelse til de økonomiske konsekvenser, hvilket gælder for alle EF-landene.
DAVID (S). — Mr President, I understand Members' concern but I would emphasize the fact that we are dealing here with a very exceptional set of circum stances.
I mellemtiden har jeg nu fået oplyst, at spørgsmålet er blevet fremskyndet og vil blive behandlet i forbindelse med debatten om aktuelle og uopsættelige spørgsmål.
Some £l09m has been withheld from the United Kingdom by the European Commission because of the UK Government's failure to obey the additionality rule.
Jeg vil derfor gøre opmærksom på, at jeg trækker mit forslag om at få dette opført på dagsordenen tilbage, da vi skal drøfte det i debatten om aktuelle og uopsættelige spørgsmål.
We are now facing a situation where further grants may be held back during the next few weeks and it is absolutely imperative that we have a Commission statement to bring this House right up to date on the situation as it develops.
(Formanden oplæste ændringerne af dagsordenen for mandag, tirsdag og onsdag) ')
(Parliament agreed to the request)
Chanterie (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, grunden til, at jeg har anmodet om ordet, er, at hr. Amendola fremførte, at Landbrugsudvalget allerede har afgivet en udtalelse.
EPHREMIDIS (CG). — (GR) Mr President, I sent you a letter asking if it would be possible to include on the agenda of this part-session a topic that is preoccupying some 90 000 persons employed in customs and related activities, seeing that, when the regulations for the completion of the single internal market are implemented, they will literally be abolished and social problems will arise, problems arising from the economic repercussions, and this goes for all the Community countries.
Jeg står her med Amendolabetænkningen.
In the meantime, however, I have been informed that this question is being put forward and will be debated under urgent procedure.
Og den indeholder ingen udtalelse fra Land brugsudvalget, i hvert fald ikke i den nederlandske version. Hr. Amendolas oplysninger er således ukorrekte. rekte.
I therefore wish to inform you that I shall withdraw my proposal for including this matter on the agenda as long as it is to be debated under urgent procedure.
Vedrørende Kommissionens redegørelse om struktur fondene
(The President read out the changes to the agenda for Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday)1
(Anmodningen om fornyet udvalgsbehandling forkastedes) stedes)
On the Commission's statement on the structural funds
Formanden. — På Den Socialistiske Gruppes anmodning vil Kommissionen på onsdag afgive en redegørelse om suppleringsprincippet inden for strukturfondene i Det Forenede Kongerige.
PRESIDENT. — Pursuant to a request from the Socialist Group the Commission will make a statement on Wednesday on the principle of additionality on the structural funds within the United Kingdom.
Derfor vil spørgetiden først begynde kl. 21.45 og blive tilsvarende forkortet.
This means that Question Time will begin at 9.45 p.m. and thus will be correspondingly shortened.
Cot (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, Den Socialistiske Gruppe anmoder under henvisning til forretningsordenens artikel 56 om, at der på dagsordenen opføres en redegørelse fra Kommissionen om situationen i Algeriet.
COLLINS (S), chairman of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection. —Mr President, I wrote to you earlier today on a matter which I understand the group chairmen have discussed this morning.
Der er rent faktisk en direkte forbindelse mellem denne situation og afstemningerne om finansprotokollen med Algeriet i den foregående mødeperiode.
I wrote to you because in the last few days we have had very serious reports from the American agency NASA about developments in the ozone layer which, if they are true, will affect every single person in this Chamber and every single person in the European Community. If they are true our whole way of life will have to change.
På gruppeformændenes møde i morges blev muligheden for anvendelse af uopsættelighedsproceduren nævnt. Efter vores mening er en sådan procedure ikke hensigtsmæssig i den nuværende situation; vi mener, at kun en redegørelse fra Kommissionen vil kunne give Parlamentet de nødvendige oplysninger.
PRESIDENT. — I would point out that the group chairmen agreed this morning to request the Commission to give a statement at the next meeting of the enlarged Bureau in Brussels, which the Commission has promised to do.
Alavanos (CG). — (GR) Hr. formand, vi forstår betydningen af Den Socialistiske Gruppes anmodning om at få opført dette spørgsmål på onsdagens dagsorden.
ALAVANOS (CG). — (GR) Mr President, we ap preciate the importance of the request made by the Socialist Group to have that subject included on the agenda for Wednesday.
Det går imidlertid alt for meget ud over Parlamentets arbejde og især medlemmernes mulig hed for selv at stille spørgsmål til Rådet, Det Politiske Samarbejde og Kommissionen.
There is, however, a problem that is now, improperly, having an adverse impact on the work of this Parliament — more specifically, on the possibility for Members personally to put questions to the Council, Political Cooperation and the Commission.
På denne baggrund vil jeg tro, at jeg taler på mange af mine kollegers vegne, når jeg anmoder om, at man finder en anden løsning i stedet for at begrænse spørgetiden.
From that point of view I should like to ask, and I think I speak on behalf of very many of my colleagues, that we find a different solution and do not start cutting back on Question Time.
Der er mange meget vigtige spørgsmål, som ikke kan skæres væk.
There are extremely important questions that it is just not possible to curtail.
Dessylas fra Kommissionen fredag, og da kommissæren ikke står til rådighed, besluttede vi os til at anmode Kommissæren om at forhandle emnet ved næste møde i Det Udvidede Præsidium.
AGLIETTA (V). — (IT) Mr President, I just wanted to confirm that, after we had asked for a Commission statement for Friday and the Commissioner having proved to be otherwise engaged, we fell back on the solution of calling on the Commissioner to debate the issue at the next meeting of the enlarged Bureau.
Formanden. — Hermed er arbejdsplanen vedtaget.2)
PRESIDENT. — The agenda is adopted.
Ophævelse af immunitet af medlemmernes kontrolmæssige rettigheder.
Waiver of parliamentary immunity
Denne nedprioritering startede allerede med flytningen af spørgetiden med spørgsmål til alle institutioner til onsdag fra 20.45 til 23.45.
Court. I would further point out that in the voting that took place in the Rules Committee no one voted to waive the immunity of Mr Avgerinos.
Jeg mener ikke, at vi både kan tale så meget, som vi gør, om en forringelse af Parlamentets rolle efter topmødet i Maastricht og samtidig foretage en yderligere ned skæring og begrænsning af spørgetiden, da dette i praksis betyder yderligere forringelse både af Parlamentet og af medlemmernes individuelle rettigheder. der.
Three people abstained and eight voted in favour of our rapporteur, Mr Defraigne. That is fully understandable because this clearly was a matter which was a political debate and I would say further that fumus persecutionis was also involved here and has surrounded the whole debate concerning the fall of the government of our colleague, Mr Papandreou.
A3-38/92) af Defraigne for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Med lemmernes Immunitet om anmodning om ophævelse af Avgerinos' parlamentariske immunitet.
A338/92) by Mr Defraigne, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, Verification of Credentials and Immunities, on the request for the parliamentary immunity of Mr Avgerinos to be waived.
David (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg har fuld forståelse for de foregående taleres bekymring vedrørende forkortelsen af spørgetiden, men det skal understreges, at der her er tale om en yderst usædvanlig situation.
MALANGRÉ (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, I am speaking on behalf of my group on both the cases currently pending of MM Avgerinos and Kostopoulos, as we wish to vote on them jointly.
Defraigne (LDR), ordfører. — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, vor kollega hr. Avgerinos førte i juni 1990 valgkampagne, som om han stadig var ung, og herunder fremsatte han udtalelser, som mishagede en dommer.
DEFRAIGNE (LDR), rapporteur. — (FR) Mr President, our colleague Mr Avgerinos conducted his electoral campaign in June 1990 as if he were still a twenty-year-old and, in the course of it, said some things that were not well received by a member of the judiciary.
Man bør vide, at den pågældende dommer havde erklæret halvdelen af kandidaterne fra det parti, som hr. Avgerinos tilhører, uantagelige.
We should bear in mind that the latter had declared ineligible half of the candidates of Mr Avgerinos' party.
Det overraskede sidstnævnte, som derfor sagde, at dommeren burde skamme sig over at have truffet en sådan beslutning, idet han tilføjede, uden at man dog ved, om det var henvendt til præfekten eller retsformanden: »Efter den 9. april, tidspunktet for valget, vil han i alle tilfælde ikke sidde der længere.« Retsformanden fandt udtalelsen injurierende og rejste sag.
Mr Avgerinos was taken aback at this and stated that the official in question ought to be ashamed to have taken such a decision adding — although it is unclear whether he was referring to the prefect or the president of the court — that after 9 April, the date of the elections, he would no longer be there. The president of the court in question considered this offensive and made a complaint.
Forretningsordensudvalget mente ikke, at hr. Avgerinos' udtalelser havde overskredet grænserne for, hvad der kan siges under en valgkampagne.
The Committee on the Rules of Procedure does not, however, take the view that, in saying what he did, Mr Avgerinos went beyond the right to freedom of expression in an electoral campaign.
Jeg foreslår derfor, at hans parlamentariske immunitet ikke ophæves.
That is why I am proposing that his parliamentary immunity should not be waived.
Collins (S), formand for Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse. — (EN) Hr. formand, tidligere på dagen anmodede jeg Dem skriftligt om, at der opføres en redegørelse fra Kommissionen om de foruroligende rapporter fra NASA om hullet i ozonlaget, der, hvis rapporterne taler sandt, vil berøre hver eneste person her i salen og i hele Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
There are many cases in which this can be overlooked, but in both these cases we should consider whether words were not used which exceed the bounds of acceptability. Where the president of a court is accused of perverting justice and, in the other instance, political opponents are called robbers, liars and party usurpers, this might casually be described as being 'a bit over the top' but it could also be described as a degeneration in political practice.
I så fald må hele vores livsstil ændres.
As in committee, we shall be abstaining.
Det ville være ønskværdigt, at Kommissionen afgav en redegørelse, men af gruppeformændenes møde i formiddags fremgår det, at Kommissionens ansvarlige medlem ikke kan være til stede.
We are, of course, aware of the line we have always taken in committee and shall continue to abide by it. We shall therefore not vote against Mr Defraigne's proposal.
Jeg skal derfor nu gøre opmærksom på, at dette punkt vil blive opført først på dagsordenen ved mødet i Miljøudvalget næste uge, hvor ansvarlige embedsmænd vil give en redegørelse, som dernæst vil blive forelagt på plenarmødet snarest muligt.
We wish to protest, however, against the way in which the campaign against political opponents was conducted in these cases, and the majority of us at least will be abstaining in both cases.
Ved mødet den 14. maj 1991 med delte Parlamentets formand, at han havde modtaget en anmodning om ophævelse af hr. Avgerinos' par lamentariske immunitet.
At the sitting of 14 May 1991 the President of Parliament announced that he had received a request for the parliamentary immunity of Mr Avgerinos to be waived.
Den var fremsendt af den græske regerings justitsminister.
It was forwarded by the Minister of Justice of the Government of Greece.
Anklagerne mod hr. Avgerinos havde som grundlag en påstand om, at han havde fornærmet retsformanden for underretten i Kavala Grækenland, og endvidere at han havde sværtet domsmyndigheden i en tale den 24. marts 1990.
The charges against Mr Avgerinos were based on grounds that he had allegedly attacked the honour of the President of the Court of First Instance of Greece and, further, that he had slandered the judicial authority in a speech made on 24 March 1990.
Efter at have undersøgt anmodningen om ophævelse af immunitet konkluderede Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, at hr. Avgerinos' udtalelser skulle ses i sammenhæng med en valgkampagne og ikke udgjorde et angreb på retsformanden. Endvidere vil jeg gerne gøre opmærksom på, at ved den
After examining the request for waiver of immunity, the Community on the Rules of Procedure concluded that the words spoken by Mr Avgerinos should be viewed in the context of an election campaign and did not constitute an abusive attack on the President of the
Aglietta (V). — (IT) Hr. formand, jeg ville blot bekræfte, at da vi havde anmodet om en redegørelse
Report without debate — Application of the simplified procedure — Delegation of the power of decision to committees — Deadline for tabling amendments and motions for resolutions — Topical and urgent debate (Subjects proposed) — Speaking time: see Minutes.
) Anvendelse af proceduren uden forhandling — Anvendelse af proceduren uden betænkning — Bemyndigelse af udvalg til al træffe afgørelse — Frist for ændringsforslag og beslutningsforslag — Debat om aktuelle og uopsættelige spørgsmål (foreslåede emner) — Taletid: se protokollen.
VECCHI (GUE). — (IT) Mr President, I am speaking on behalf of the Group for the European Unitarian Left simply to support the proposals contained in the two reports by Mr Defraigne that the parliamentary immunity of our colleagues, Mr Avgerinos and Mr Kostopoulos, should not be waived.
Harrison om udtryk for politiske synspunkter, som også når de udtrykkes i farvede eller ophidsede vendinger fortjener størst mulig respekt og Parlamentets beskyttelse.
(Parliament adopted the decision) thought, which, even though the form in which it was uttered may have been highly-coloured and emotional, deserves all due respect and the protection of this Assembly.
Derfor takker vi ordføreren for det udmærkede arbejde, og vi gentager, at vi stemmer mod ophævelsen af de to pågældende kollegers immunitet.
For this reason we once again thank the rapporteur for his excellent work and we reiterate our decision to vote against waiving the immunity of our two colleagues in question.
Tre medlemmer stemte hver ken for eller imod og otte stemte for vor ordfører, hr. Defraigne.
PRESIDENT. — The next item is the report (Doc.
Det er helt forståeligt, for det drejede sig ganske klart om en politisk debat, og derudover vil jeg sige, at der var fumus persecutionis, som der har været i hele debatten vedrørende hr. Papandreous regerings fald. Jeg beder derfor Parlamentet om at følge vor ordfører, hr. Defraignes indstilling og ikke ophæve hr. Avgerinos' immunitet.
A339/92) by Mr Defraigne, drawn up on behalf of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, Verification of Credentials and Immunities, on the request for the parliamentary immunity of Mr Kostopoulos to be waived.
Alavanos (CG). — (GR) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne sige, at vi også er enige i hr. Defraignes forslag.
ALAVANOS (CG). — (GR) Mr President, I wish to say that we agree with the proposal made by Mr Defraigne.
Jeg tror, at vi græske medlemmer kender hr. Avgerinos, og, såvidt vi ved, kan han ikke finde på at skride til handlinger, som fører til ophævelse af den parlamentariske immunitet.
I think that we, Mr Avgerinos's Greek colleagues, are well acquainted with him and are not aware that he would be capable of activities such as might lead to a waiver of his immunity.