natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Princippet om behandling af bestrålet brændsel er foreneligt med Fællesskabets politik for atomenergi, idet man går ud fra princippet om sikkerhed for befolkningen og beskyttelse af miljøet.
In the particular case of the Dounreay proposals, these are specific provisions concerning the return to the country of origin, by September 1996, of stored irradiated fuel, if unprocessed, or the return of the waste remaining after reprocessing, in the proper form and as
Under hensyn til det foran oplyste har Kommissionen ikke i dette øjeblik nogen mulighed for at gribe ind på grundlag af de i dag foreliggende oplysninger, selv om den forstår den uro, der har grebet befolkningen, over for hvilken den giver udtryk for solidaritet.
to produce a valid strategy. We in this European Community are supposed to have a directive on the freedom of environmental information.
For så vidt angår vandet i Nordsøen, har man desuden beregnet, at en person, der eksempelvis og som et aldeles exceptionelt tilfælde havde konsumeret 600 gram fisk om dagen i tidsrummet 1980-1985, kun skulle have været udsat for 10 microSievert ved optagelse af cæsium 137, der er det dominerende kunstige radioaktive forurenende stof.
On that basis, while it understands the anxiety of the population with whom it expresses its solidarity, the Commission does not at present, on the basis of the data collected, have reason to intervene.
Desuden skulle Dounreay-anlæggets bidrag til denne kontaminering, selv om det er alt for ringe til at blive vurderet på grundlag af foreskrevne standarder, sandsynligvis være mindre end 10% af denne værdi. Til sammenligning skulle den samme person have optaget radionukleider, der af naturlige årsager forekommer i fisk, svarende til en årlig udsættelse på 300 microSievert.
As far as the concern expressed by the Norwegian government goes, I wish to reiterate what I said yesterday in Brussels to the Norwegian Secretary of State for the Environment: the results of the monitoring of which we have been informed by the competent British authorities as well as those sent by all the other Member States, are regularly reviewed and will continue to be reviewed by the Commission departments in order to check, within the restrictive limits of the Euratom Treaty, that the basic Community standards are continuing to be observed.
Der er derfor ingen grund til at tro, at denne situation kan forandre sig mærkbart, hvis man vedtog forslagene om midlertidig oplagring og eventuel oparbejdning af brændsel fra tredjeland i Dounreay-anlægget.
In that connection, I shall therefore always be available, in future also, for any clarification the Norwegian government may require.
Formanden. — I overensstemmelse med artikel 56, stk. 3, i forretningsordenen, har Regnbuegruppen anmodet om at lade denne redegørelse efterfølge af en forhandling.
PRESIDENT. — Pursuant to Rule 56(2) I have received a request from the Rainbow Group for a debate to be held on these statements.
Collins (S), formand for Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er Kommissionen taknemlig, fordi den gik ind på den anmodning, som min partifælle og kollega, hr. Llewellyn Smith, oprindelig fremsatte om en redegørelse.
My final point, Mr President, is that it has come to our notice that not only movements of such waste are taking place which local populations find out about by accident and too late, very often, but a well as that some of the means employed to move the waste are entirely unsatisfactory.
Jeg er meget glad for, at kommissæren nu har afgivet den.
Mr President, can the Commission tell us whether it knows anything at all about this?
Jeg må sige, at der stadig er en ting eller to i den, som ikke kan passere uden kritik.
Can it confirm it? Can it deny it?
Derfor synes der ikke at være nogen grund til at formode, at disse forslag vil medføre en alvorlig radiologisk risiko via industrierne langs Nordsøen eller andre fiskeindustrier.
If it can confirm it, will it make sure that this is outlawed in the future and if they deny any knowledge of it, will the Commission undertake to investigate these reports and make sure that it never happens again ?
Jeg vil til sidst beskæftige mig med problemet omkring endelig deponering af slaggeaffald efter oparbejdning eller af bestrålet brændsel, når der ikke finder oparbejdning sted.
If the ferry that went down at Zeebrugge a few years ago had containd nuclear waste, what was already a disaster would have been turned into a catastrophe for the whole of the European Community.
Som det er blevet påpeget, ville denne fremgangsmåde med underjordisk opbevaring af brændselet i hensigtsmæssige depoter omkring den reaktor, der producerer brændselet, overflødiggøre transport — og specielt grænseoverskridende transport — af dette.
COLLINS (S), chairman of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection. — Mr President, I am grateful to the Commission fo acceding to the request originally made by my friend and colleague, Mr Llewellyn Smith, for a statement.
Jeg tror, Kommissionen velsagtens vil være enig med os, når vi siger, at uanset hvilken holdning vi har til problemet, må sikkerhedsspørgsmålet være det alt dominerende.
I think the Commission would probably agree with us when wc say that whatever approach we adopt to this problem, the problem of safety must be paramount.
Befolkningens sikkerhed og miljøets sikkerhed må tages fuldt ud i betragtning.
The safety of the population and the safety of the environment must be taken fully into consideration.
Kommissionen foretager i øjeblikket en undersøgelse af medlemsstaternes bestemmelser vedrørende deponering af radioaktivt affald med henblik på etableringen af det indre marked.
BANOTTI (PPE). — Mr President, I thank the Commissioner for his statement. I would also like to second many of the statements made by Ken Collins in his speech.
Desværre, hr. formand, bestemmes politikken med hensyn til transport af nukleart affald i Det Euro pæiske Fællesskab i virkeligheden ikke af reelle strategiske overvejelser, men at to modsat rettede bevægelser.
Unfortunately, Mr President, the policy for the move ment of nuclear waste in the European Community is really being determined, not by any real strategic considerations, but by two opposing movements.
Den ene er selskabernes og myndighedernes ønske om at behandle nukleart affald på den måde, de finder for godt, uden at spørge lokalbefolkningen — eller for den sags skyld nogen anden befolkningsdel.
One is the desire of the companies and the authorities to deal with nuclear waste in whatsoever way they please without consulting the local populations — or with any other populations, come to that.
Den anden er lokalbefolkningen, der protesterer.
The second is the local populations which object.
Vanskeligheden ved det er, at den ende lige beslutning om oplagringsstedet træffes på grundlag af den økonomiske og politiske magt hos myndighederne eller i de samfund, der simpelt hen kan råbe højest.
The trouble with this is that the final decision on the disposal point is taken on the basis of the economic and political power of the authorities or by those communities which are simply able to shout the loudest. That, Mr President, is no way
I det særlige tilfælde, som forslagene vedrørende Dounreay frembyder, foreligger der konkrete bestemmelser om tilbagesendelse til oprindelseslandet af det oplagrede bestrålede brændsel inden september 1996, medmindre brændselet er blevet oparbejdet, eller tilbagesendelse af affaldsslagger efter oparbejdning i hensigtsmæssig form og hurtigst muligt — i hvert tilfælde ikke ud over et tidsrum på maksimalt 25 år.
I would like to ask the Commissioner if he could give us an up-to-date report on when this great force will come into operation ? I would also like some information from him on the methods and frequency of the transportation of nuclear waste from, for example, Japan, which we understand is passing through the Irish Sea.
De nuværende prøveboringer i Dounreay-området, hvorved man ønsker at kaste lys over muligheden for at bygge et deponeringsanlæg i de geologiske lag, har ingen som helst forbindelse med forslagene om midlertidig oplagring af brændsel i forskningsreaktorer med mulighed for oparbejdning. ning.
May I also say that once again it struck me, when the Commission made its statement — and I have seen the storage facility in the Sellafield plant; it was a very new one, in fact just in the process of being opened when I visited it — that when this warehouse is full — and I am convinced that the storage per se in that particular warehouse is safe — British Nuclear Fuels build another warehouse.
') Frist for beslutningsforslag og ændringsforslag: Se protokollen.
At what stage do we simply say we are going to run out of places to erect these warehouses in a safe
Collins bygning er sikker — vil British Nuclear Fuels bygge en ny.
BANOTTI and secure manner ?
Til sidst må vi spørge os selv, om prisen for at fortsætte denne proces ikke er for høj.
In the end are we going to ask ourselves whether the price is too high to continue this process ?
Europæiske Fællesskab formodes at have et direktiv om frihed for miljøoplysninger.
For years now, scientists in the USA, Japan, the Federal Republic and other countries have been demonstrating that there is no solution when it comes to nuclear waste.
Jeg må sige, hr. for mand, at jeg gerne vil høre Kommissionens kom mentarer om, hvorvidt dette direktiv nogen sinde er blevet ført ud i livet, for så vidt angår bortskaffelse, transport, forarbejdning og oplagring af nukleart affald.
Plutonium alone is radioactive for 24,000 years, ladies and gentlemen, please take note!
Det er nødvendigt at reducere transporten af affald.
Geologists from a number of countries have shown that it is not possible to bury it safely in salt deposits and granite.
Det er nødvendigt at sikre, at der ikke foregår nogen import eller eksport af nukleart materiale til og fra Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
We are therefore demanding that there should be no further transport of nuclear waste, as it is not just the containers that have been tested for a number of years only.
Kellett-Bowman (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, det er altid et følelsesladet emne, og jeg er taknemlig for de forsikringer, kommissæren har givet os i dag.
KELLETT-BOWMAN (ED). — Mr President, this is always an emotive subject and I am grateful for the reassurances which the Commissioner has given us today.
Der er mange mennesker, der gerne ville gøre denne viden skab uopfundet, men den er hos os.
There are many people who would like to disinvent this science, but it is with us.
Jeg kan langtfra følge hr. Collins hele vejen i det, han sagde, da han talte om materiale, der indføres til Europa.
I would go quite a long way short of what Mr Collins said when he talked about stuff being brought into Europe.
Jeg anser alle disse ting for at have en potentiel virkning på det globale miljø, og det kan være euro-chauvinistisk af mig, men jeg ønsker, at disse processer finder sted, hvor sagkundskaben og ressourcerne er til rådighed, så det kan sikres, at det gøres efter de højeste kvalitetsnormer, der kendes.
I regard all these things as having a potential effect on the global environment and it may be Euro-chauvinist of me but I want these processes to take place where the expertise and the resources are available to make sure they are done at the highest quality standard known to man.
Jeg har set forbeholdene om Dounreay.
I have seen the reservations about Dounreay.
Skotterne må nødvendigvis gøre sig klart, at man for øjeblik ket kan se enden på deres energiressourcer, og at de ikke må vende ryggen til moderne udvikling, der kan hjælpe dem til at klare sig i fremtiden. Hvis man ønsker den slags affald ødelagt, som vi taler om, så er den første reaktor i Dounreay særdeles egnet.
Scotland needs to be aware that their resources of energy at the moment are finite and that they must not turn their back on modern developments which will help take care of them in the future.
Hr. formand, kan Kommissionen fortælle os, om den ved noget som helst om det? Kan den bekræfte det?
Mr Ripa de Meana, you stated that the containers are tested and that you are therefore reassured.
Kan den afvise det? Hvis den kan bekræfte det, vil den så sørge for, at det bliver forbudt i fremtiden, og hvis den benægter ethvert kendskab til det, vil den så forpligte sig til at undersøge disse forlydender og sørge for, at det aldrig sker igen?
But if plutonium has a half life of 24,000 years — less in the case of other substances — how can you claim that the containers, the methods of transport and storage have been tested, when such tests may take place over a period of perhaps five or ten years, while the question of safety is one of thousands of years ?
Hvis den færge, der gik ned ved Zeebrugge for et par år siden, havde transporteret nukleart affald, så ville det, der allerede var en ulykke, være blevet til en katastrofe for hele Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
I am pleased to hear you express your solidarity with the people, but if you are serious, Mr Ripa de Meana, you should go and visit in the near future the people in those regions of Europe who are fighting the storage, indeed not just the storage but the actual production of nuclear waste.
Den reelle indsats, Kommissionen skal gøre, er at sørge for, at disse høje normer fastholdes og forbedres, når som helst videnskaben gør det muligt, og at det omgivende samfund og Europas befolkning som helhed gennem PR-virksomhed på kontinuerligt grundlag beroliges fra tid til anden, for ellers vil folk, der ikke er os velvilligt stemt, volde vanskelig heder.
The real job which the Commission has to do is to make sure that these high standards are maintained and improved whenever science makes it possible, and that through public relations the immediate community, and the people of Europe as a whole, are reassured from time to time on a continual basis, because otherwise people who do not wish us well will make trouble.
Jeg vil også gerne have nogle oplysninger fra ham om metoderne til og hyppigheden af transport af nukleart affald fra f.eks.
What we are really doing is using nuclear waste to carry out a terrifying and gigantic experiment on humanity!
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
EWING (ARC). — Mr President, Dounreay is in my constituency.
Quistorp vesteuropæiske befolkning, men for verden, menneskeheden, dyreverdenen, ja, livet som helhed.
On Friday the drilling machines moved in even though the elected authorities — the Highland Regional Council, the planning authorities — said no.
Arbejderne i Dounreay afholdt en afstemning.
The workers in Dounreay had a referendum.
De sagde nej.
They said no.
Alle de omgivende regionalmyndigheder sagde nej.
All the surrounding regional authorities say no.
Norge siger nej.
Norway says no.
Island siger nej, og Færøerne siger nej.
Iceland says no, and the Faroes say no.
Det gør man mod os.
This is happening to us.
Derfor kræver vi, at der ikke finder yderligere transport af atomaffald sted, fordi ikke kun beholderne kun er testet for nogle år.
These citizens are fighting not just because they themselves, their environment or locality will be damaged by radionuclides that remain radioactive and cause damage to the environment over a long period, but because they konow that this is a threat not only to their region, their people, not only to the people of Western Europe, but to the whole world, human life, animal life and all living things.
Hvis affald skal vi behandle?
Whose waste should we be dealing with ?
Vi accepterer, at vi oplagrer vort eget affald på stedet, over jorden, som den sidste taler sagde.
We accept we store our own waste on site, above ground, as the last speaker said.
Men vi kan ikke se, hvorfor nogle af Dem forestiller sig, at De kan komme af med Deres affald i min skønne del af Skotland.
But we do not see why any of you imagine you can get rid of your waste in my beautiful part of Scotland.
Det er ikke engang fornuftigt, vel, at sende alt dette affald fra Spanien, fra Nederlandene, hvor jeg tror Kommissionen har en interesse i anlægget, og fra Tyskland?
It is not even sensible, is it, to send all this stuff from Spain, from the Netherlands where the Commission has an interest, I believe, in the installation there — and from Germany ? I congratulate the Germans
Jeg takker tyskerne, fordi de var imod det.
EWING because they were against this.
Vi må sige tyskerne tak for, hvad de har gjort.
We have to thank the Germans for what they have done.
Men jeg gentager: Hvad er meningen med det for vore samfund? Alle de områder, dette affald skal passere, vil være i fare.
But I repeat : where is the sense to our communities?
Hvad er fornuften i det, når det, vi helt klart ønsker, er en meget enkel afgørelse fra Kommissionen om, at det skal oplagres på stedet, over jorden?
Where is the sense of this when quite clearly what we are looking for is a very simple ruling from the Commission that we should store it on site, above ground.
Enhver må påtage sig ansvaret for sit eget affald.
Everyone must accept responsibility for their own waste.
Hvordan i alverden kan De forestille Dem, at bare fordi vi har en ringe befolkningstæthed, kan De læsse Deres problemer af hos os?
Why on earth should you imagine that just because we have a low population density you can dump your problem on us ?
Med hensyn til spørgsmålet om transport af affald, så tænk på vore veje.
On the question of transport of waste, think of our roads.
Hr. Collins sagde, at lastbilerne skal være sikre.
Mr Collins mentioned that lorries had to be safe.
Tænk på de veje, vi har i det nordlige Skotland. Kommer affaldet ad landevejen? Kommer det med banen?
Think of the roads we have got in the north of Scotland.
Den er også noget skrøbelig.
That is pretty creaky too.
Kommer det over havet og bringer hele Fællesskabets proteinforsyning i fare? Kommer det ad luftvejen?
Is it coming by sea and endangering the whole protein supply of the Community ?
Det er endnu mere gruopvækkende, for vi ved jo, at ethvert fly, hvis det ikke hugges op, til sidst vil falde ned.
That is even more horrendous because we know that every airplane, unless it is scrapped, will eventually crash.
Vi må virkelig have indført princippet om fairness for alle lokaliteter.
We really have to establish the principle of fairness to all places.
Hr. Ripa di Meana, De sagde, at beholderne var testede, og derfor var De rolig. Når plutonium har en halveringstid på 24 000 år — andre stoffer mindre — hvorledes kan De så sige, at disse beholdere, transporten og lagringen er testet, når sådanne tests måske varer fem eller femten år, som imidlertid skal sættes i relation til tusinder af år, hvor det drejer sig om sikkerheden?
As for the problem of nuclear power stations, 90% of them are concentrated in Germany and France.
Det glæder mig, når De siger, at De er solidarisk med befolkningen, men hvis De mener Deres ord alvorligt, hr. Ripa di Meana, vær da så venlig inden længe at besøge befolkningen i de regioner i Europa, som protesterer mod lagringen — og ikke kun mod oplagringen, men mod produktionen af atomaffald.
I, for my part, am extremely disappointed, and as the representative of the radical party, I am concerned and we are concerned at the lack of action in France and Germany; the failure to combat this very grave state of affairs.
Det er ret beset et forfærdeligt eksperiment, vi anstiller med menneskeheden qua atomaffaldet.
In fact, it was also based on the problems relating to the roll-on roll-off ferries, such as the one involved in the disaster in Zeebrugge when unfortunately 170 good lives were lost.
Hr. Ripa di Meana sagde, at han ville overveje virkningen for erhvervene i Nordskotland.
Mr Ripa Di Meana said he would consider the impact on industries in the north of Scotland.
Erhvervene i Nordskotland er landbrug, fiskeri og turisme.
The industries in the north of Scotland are agriculture, fisheries and tourism.
Ingen kommer og besøger os, hvis denne situation fortsætter.
Noone is going to come to visit us if this situation goes on.
Ingen vil købe oksekødet — og i øjeblikket er det oksekød af meget høj kvalitet, forøget af det rene miljø. Ingen vil købe fisk.
Noone is going to buy the beef — and at the moment it is very high quality beef, enhanced by the clean environment.
Det er virkningen for vore erhverv.
That is the impact on our industries.
Permanente arbejdspladser vil ikke længere være der.
Permanent jobs will not be there any more.
Alt sammen noget som De tillader i en smuk, fjern del af Europa, som De burde værdsætte højt for dets miljømæssige betydning.
All of that is what some of you are allowing to happen to a beautiful, remote part of Europe that you should treasure for its environmental importance.
I stedet for ser det ud til, at vi skal modtage affald fra Deres lande, fra Japan, hvor som helst fra, fordi vi har et stort hul på stedet, forstår De, som det er meget praktisk at smide det ned i.
Instead of which it looks as if we are going to take waste from your countries, from Japan, any old place, beacause we have got the big hole, you see, on the spot, very convenient to dump it in.
Jeg appellerer derfor om solidaritet her.
So I do appeal for solidarity here.
Pannella (NI). — (IT) Hr. formand, hr. kommissær, kære kolleger, hver gang jeg hører fru Ewing, bestyrkes jeg — lad dette være sagt i forbifarten — i min overbevisning om, at det britiske system med flertalsvalg i enkeltmandskredse har en absolut overie-
PANNELLA (NI). — (IT) Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, every time I listen to Mrs Ewing, I am confirmed, let me say in passing, in my view of the absolute superiority of the British first-past-the-post system over all the pretence at democracy in continental Europe which has produced only monstrous political regimes, enabling that system to combine for the best — Mrs Ewing is an example of this — reasonableness, therory, practice and encouragement and peoples' true feelings rather than speculation as to what those feelings may be.
Desværre mener jeg ikke, at kommissæren svarede på noget af disse punkter i sin redegørelse.
Unfortunately, I do not think the Commissioner responded to any one of these points in his statement.
Ej heller drejer denne debat sig bare om færger eller specialbyggede skibe.
Nor is this debate just about ferries or purpose-built ships.
Den drejer sig også om transport over grænserne af brugt brændsel.
It is also about the transfrontier shipment of spent fuel.
Det, vi siger, er, at vi er modstandere af denne trafik.
What we are saying is that we are opposed to this trade.
Vi er modstandere af transport over grænserne af brugt brændsel.
We are opposed to the transfrontier shipment of spent fuel.
Vor modstand har intet at gøre med nationalistiske argumenter, for vi er overhovedet ikke nationalistiske.
Our opposition has nothing to do with nationalistic argument, because we are not at all nationalistic.
Vort argument har alt at gøre med ansvarlige regeringer.
Our argument has everything to do with responsible governments.
Det, vi siger til regeringerne over hele verden, er, at de ikke skulle være slået ind på den nukleare vej, hvis de ikke havde både viden og vilje til at tage sig af dette brændsel.
What we say to governments the world over is that they should not have gone down the nuclear road unless they had both the hnowledge and the willingness to deal with that fuel.
Desværre havde vi ikke denne viden for en 40-50 år siden, vi havde ikke viljen, og endnu ulykkeligere er, at vi i dag stadig ikke har denne viden og stadig ikke har denne vilje.
Un fortunately, some 40 to 50 years ago we did not have that knowledge, we did not have that willingness, and even more unfortunately today we still do not have that knowledge and we still do not have that willingness.
Nogle af de specialbyggede skibe sejler nu langs Nordwales' kyst.
Some of those purpose-built ships are now travelling along the North Wales coast.