natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vi har tværtimod værdsat Kommissionens mod til at tage fat på en sag, som ikke længere kan udsættes, fordi den fælles landbrugspolitiks mekanismer er i krise, og vi er fast overbevist om, at indkomststøtte i stedet for prisstøtte ikke blot er nødvendig, men også retfærdig.
All the groups in the House have confirmed that this would be a real alternative, but they have not had the courage to be consistent and go down this road and persuade the European Parliament to do its duty.
En sådan giver mulighed for en målrettet differentieret politik, som tager hensyn til miljøvirkningen og det europæiske landbrugs mangfoldighed, og den kan frembyde nye muligheder for verdenshandelen, uden hvilken det europæiske land brug — det må man gøre sig helt klart! — ville være dømt til at skrumpe kraftigt ind.
The rule will be that surpluses continue to be produced and exported, that dumped exports will be subsidized and animal feedingstuffs imported from Third World countries at dumping prices.
Disse grunde er tungtvejende og objektive og må ikke opfattes som trusler, der lammer landbruget og dets muligheder.
It will also continue to be the rule that chemicals are used in the production of 80 to 90% of food and that just a few farms — or 'agricultural enterprises' they must be called in this case — will be responsible for this output.
Graefe zu Baringdorf (V). — (DE) Hr. formand, i forbindelse med reformen af landbrugspolitikken kan man ud fra kommissær MacSharrys synsvinkel, nemlig hans ønske om at sikre eksportmarkederne for EF på landbrugsområdet, ikke frakende ham en vis elegance.
The exception is that there is talk in this context of environmental protection, which is to be the responsibility of the majority of farmers, who have been stopped producing and will not resume production.
Han har snigløbet amerikanerne, idet han har overtaget deres system og dermed ladet modstanden løbe ud i sandet, og det er lykkedes for ham, at der i den offentlige debat tales meget lidt om reglen i den kommende EF-landbrugspolitik og desto mere om undtagelserne.
The exception is that a small proportion of food will be produced by environmentally acceptable methods, leading to the production of good food, although it will have something of an exclusive label on it in quantity terms and will in effect simply endorse the logic of continuing to use chemicals.
De er snarere betingelser for at give EFs producenter nye konkurrencemuligheder, men der skal også tages miljø- og samhørighedshensyn.
GUILLAUME (RDE). — (FR) Mr President, if the CAP is in need of reform, the reason is not that it has run out of steam but quite simply that, both in everyday business and in international negotiations, the Commission and the Council have allowed it to wilt under external pressure.
Der skal ikke blot prædikes om disse, men de skal varetages med bevidste og stabile politikker, som bygger på en opgørelse over landbrugets samlede virkning. På den anden side hører vi ikke til dem, som mener, at alle problemer er udpeget og løst på bedst mulige måde med MacSharry-forslaget.
Witness the surrender, one after the other in the GATT negotiations, of such key com ponents of the policy as the variable levy, the means of maintaining Community preference, and the refund, the means of sustaining our exports on a world market where prices no longer bear any relation to economic reality.
Vi må insistere på nogle punkter, som der skal gøres mere ud af, med mindre vores gruppe skal have kraftige forbehold. Det drejer sig om tre væsentUge spørgsmål.
But the worst thing about this debate is that the European Parliament has not put forward and is not putting forward a real alternative.
Det første er kravet om en mere direkte forbindelse mellem reformen af den fælles landbrugspolitik og nye muligheder for strukturfondspolitikken, for uden en sådan vil en mere omfattende udvikling af landområderne blot blive en principerklæring.
With his report Mr Bocklet has essentially produced a Mac Sharry blend, which tones down something here, adds or hushes something up there and fails to advance any real
Reglen vil være, at der fortsat produceres overskud, at der eksporteres, gives dumpingeksportstøtte og importeres foderstoffer til dumpingpriser fra lande i Den Tredje Verden.
What a long way we have come, in the wrong direction, since Punta del Este, where the Community's vital interests were protected.
Reglen vil også fortsat være, at 80-90% af næringsmidlerne avles i en produktion baseret på kemikalier, og at denne produktion over tages af få bønder — eller i dette tilfælde bør man sige: landbrugsbedrifter.
The worst aspect of all is doubtless the abandonment of any system to offset the dollar's erratic movements or the deliberate undervaluation of the yen. Because it is clear to all — apart from
Undtagelsen er, at der her tales om miljøbeskyttelse, som så skal varetages af det flertal af bønder, som man har taget produktionen fra og som man ikke vil give den igen.
GUILLAUME the Commissioner, apparently — that the Americans and Japanese have more to gain from monetary manipulation than from tough international negoti­ations that have been going on for five years.
Guillaume (RDE). — (FR) Hr. formand, når den fælles landbrugspolitik har behov for at bhve reformeret, er det ikke, fordi den er ved at være færdig, det er simpelt hen, fordi Kommissionen og Rådet både i det daglige og under internationale forhandlinger er blevet møre under presset udefra.
Your reform, Commissioner, is both too much and too little. Too much for the farmers driven by despair to abandon the land and join the dole queues.
Det vidner den gradvise prisgivelse i GATT af så væsentlige rettigheder som variabel afgift til sikring af fællesskabspræferencen og støtten til sikring af vor eksport til et verdensmarked, hvis priser ikke mere har nogen reel økonomisk betydning.
Too little to bear out the claim to be using the same weapons as the United States to hold on to our internal markets, sustain our foreign trade and not be accused in GATT of distorting competition. If you want an example, cereals will do.
Det værste ved denne debat her er imidlertid, at Europa-Parlamentet ikke har fremlagt og ikke vil fremlægge noget egentügt alternativ.
Your first concessions in GATT, if carried over directly into the CAP and applied, would lose us 15 to 20 of the 30 million tonnes of cereals that we regularly export.
Sikken en lang vej i den forkerte retning siden Punta del Este, hvor Fællesskabets væsentlige interesser blev bevaret.
unemployed. This lack of employment basically affects peasants who do not own their own land, the labourers who make up 60% of the working population involved in agriculture.
Det værste er uden tvivl opgivelsen af ethvert system til korrektion af de uregelmæssige dollarsvingninger eUer den bevidste undervurdering af yen.
They are the workers subsidized by the Government, with the social, political and adminis­trative problems familiar to us all.
For det er klart for alle undtagen tilsyneladende kommissæren, at amerikanerne og japanerne har mere at vinde ved monetær manipulation end ved en hård international forhandling, som har varet ved i fem år.
Our entry into the Community was determined by the hope raised by the Treaty of Rome, Article 39 of which refers to increasing agricultural productivity as a means of obtaining fair and just remuneration in the same way as the other citizens of the Community.
Deres reform, hr. kommissær, er på én gang for meget og ikke nok.
Producer prices will be drastically cut.
For meget for landmændene, som fortvivlelsen driver til at forlade deres jord og øge arbejdsløsheden.
I do not know how many agricultural concerns will be able to withstand this attack or how they will be able to exist with the world market price, determined by the North American agri­food system.
Ikke nok til at foregive at bruge samme våben som USA for at holde vore indre markeder, støtte vor udenrigshandel og ikke i GATT bUve anklaget for at fordreje konkurrencen. De ønsker et eksempel: korn.
No one denies that this reduction will have a negative effect, not even the Commission.
Deres første indrømmelser i GATT overført direkte til anvendelse i den fælles landbrugspoUtik vil bevirke, at vi mister 15-20 mio. t korn af de 30, vi normalt eksporterer.
However, there are two fundamental questions : 'Will it 100% cover the loss in income resulting from the fall in prices ? And for how long will be compensation be accorded ?'
De hævder, at vi til gengæld vil anvende 8 mio. t korn til opfodring af kvæg i stedet for erstatningsprodukter.
The Commission has been unable or unwilling to commit itself with clear answers on this.
Det hævder De, men De beviser det ikke, trods mine gentagne opfordringer. De vil simpelthen have os til at tage skyggen for byttet. tet.
This has resulted in the enormous confusion prevailing and clearly revealed — and this is a matter of concern — in the report of the Committee on Budgets which refers to decreasing aids, limited in time, even anticipating compulsory expenditure within the meaning of the EAGGF Guarantee Section.
De forstår, at jeg ikke kan skrive under på Deres plan, som Bockletbetænkningen desværre gør.
As you will appreciate, I am unable to go along with your approach, which I am sorry to see is supported in the Bocklet report.
Bare De havde foreslået de europæiske bønder en ægte udfordring på lige konkurrencevilkår med de bedste producenter i verden, navnlig med USA's. Bare De havde set det hele lidt mere fra oven og kastet Deres blik lidt længere bort end til den silo, som spærrer for udsynet, eller det frysehus, der er fuldt af smør eller kød, så ville De have set, at om 25 år skal verdens landbrugsproduktion være dobbelt så stor som nu for at mætte dem, der er sultne og ikke mere vil acceptere at dø på stedet.
If only you had offered European farmers a genuine challenge to compete on equal terms with the best in the world, notably the Americans. If only you had taken a rather longer view, looking beyond the overflowing silos and refrigerators full of butter or meat, you might have seen that 25 years from now world agricultural production is going to have to be doubled to feed the hungry, who are no longer prepared to be left to die.
Så mange skønne udfordringer til et Europa, som er stærkt, konkurrencedygtigt og tillige gavmildt!
What splendid challenges for a Europe both strong and competitive, but generous as well !
Vi befinder os desværre langt derfra.
These proposals are a far cry from that, and more's the pity.
Ud fra det hr. Delors sagde ved afslutningen af sit møde med præsident Bush, skal vi producere mindre, eksportere mindre og importere mere. Et kedeligt program, hr. kommissær!
As was clear from what President Delors had to say after his meeting on agriculture with George Bush, we are going to produce less, export less and import more.
Jeg behøver vist ikke sige til Dem, at det ikke er mit.
No need for me to tell you that it is not my programme.
Nogle uger senere begravende den franske regering dette modforslag og foreslår nu kun en bøjen af over for Kommissionens forslag.
A few weeks later the French Government had buried these counter­proposals and was reduced to suggesting adjustments to the Commission's proposals.
Endnu en gang har presset fra USA kvalt de få tilløb til modstand, der kom til udtryk.
Once again, pressure from the United States had stifled the meagre efforts made to put up resistance.
de Los Santos López (ARC). — (ES) Hr. formand, under topmødet i Maastricht er den spanske ministerpræsident rede til endog at benytte vetoretten, hvis begrebet økonomisk og social samhørighed ikke medtages i beslutningen.
DE LOS SANTOS LÓPEZ (ARC). — (ES) Mr President, on the occasion of the Maastricht summit, the Spanish Prime Minister is prepared actually to use his right of veto if the concept of economic and social cohesion is not included in the decision.
Vi mener dog ikke, at denne idé kan realiseres alene gennem en fordobling af strukturfondene.
We none the less consider that this requirement is not met just by doubling the structural funds.
Den økonomiske og sociale samhørighed bør præge alle EF-politikkerne begyndende med den fælles landbrugspolitik.
Economic and social cohesion should be inherent in all Community policies, starting with the CAP.
Den økonomiske og sociale samhørighed er udelukket, hvis den nye fælles landbrugspoUtik udformes i blinde uden hensyn til de store regionale skævheder, der findes i Fællesskabet.
There can be no social and economic cohesion if the new CAP is established arbitrarily without taking into account the major structural imbalances that exist in the Community.
Man må desværre konstatere, at Parlamentets Land brugsudvalg arbejder i samme ånd.
Sadly, we cannot escape the conclusion that our Committee on Agriculture is aligning itself with this spirit of resignation.
Selv om det har vedtaget positive ændringsforslag, retter de ikke tilstrækkeligt op på betænkningens grundlæggende retningslinjer, som forværredes yderligere mandag aften ved vedtagelsen af ændringsforslag fra Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse og fra Budgetudvalget.
Even though it has adopted constructive amendments, these do not do enough to correa the basic thrust of the report, whose faults were made worse by the amendments adopted on Monday evening by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Budgets.
I Andalusien er mellem 25% og 28% af den erhvervsaktive befolkning beskæftiget i landbruget.
In Andalusia, between 25% and 28% of the working population is employed in agriculture.
I Andalusien ligger omtrent en femtedel af Spaniens agerjord, det vil sige to en halv gang så meget som Hollands.
Andalusia constitutes approximately one­fifth of usable agricul­tural land in Spain, that is to say, two and a half times that of the Netherlands.
Landbruget er hos os en sektor i strukturel krise, hvilket giver sig udslag i en arbejdsløshed på 21%.
Agriculture is a sector experiencing structural crisis in our country, and this is reflected in the fact that 21% of the population is
Ledigheden har især ramt de jordløse bønder, daglejerne, der udgør 60 % af de erhvervsaktive i landbruget.
In endorsing the dismantling of protection at Com­munity frontiers, the dismantling of intervention and
Priserne i produktionsleddet vil blive sænket drastisk. Jeg ved ikke, hvor mange landbrugsbedrifter, der vil kunne holde til den behandUng, og hvordan de skal kunne over leve med verdensmarkedspriserne, der bestemmes af USAs industrielle fødevareproduktion. Ingen, heller ikke Kommissionen, forsøger at benægte de negative konsekvenser, et sådant prisfald vil få.
AINARDI everyone here is fully aware that we are reforming the CAP because the United States of America has asked us in the GATT round to discontinue our aid to farmers.
Derfor vil man kompensere med indkomststøtte.
One has only to look at the scope of your CAP.
Men der rejser sig to fundamentale spørgsmål: Vil denne kom pensation fuldt ud erstatte det indkomsttab, der følger med prisnedsættelsen?
It is confined to products that the United States is complaining about.
Og hvor længe vil denne kompensation blive opretholdt?
The United States is not complain ing about wine, vegetables or fruit, so they are of no interest to you.
Ved at gå ind for fjernelsen af beskyttelsen ved Fællesskabets grænser, fjernelsen af støtte og restitutioner samt en nedskæring over fem år på 35% af støtten inden for rammerne af GATT er Landbrugs udvalgets betænkning helt i hr. MacSharrys ånd.
refunds, and a 35% reduction in aid over five years under the terms of GATT, the Committee on Agriculture's report takes the same line as Mr Mac Sharry's proposals.
Man ved, at iværksættelsen af dette forslag vil drage EF-landbrugets trumf alvorligt i tvivl, medføre ny nedgang i indkomsterne — således som alle de modelforsøg, der er gennemført, viser — og indføre et landbrug i flere tempi, oven i købet overadministreret og bureaukratiseret.
As we know, putting these proposals into practice would seriously jeopardize the asset that the Community has in its farming, it would lead to further falls in incomes — as all the simulations that have been made confirm — and it would result in a multi-speed agriculture which, to make matters worse, would be hamstrung by bureaucracy.
Den direkte støtte er ikke garanteret, hverken med hensyn til beløb eller varighed. Den er så meget desto mere illusorisk, som de i Parlamentet, der kræver den med størst styrke, er de samme, som fordrer nye nedskæringer på budgettet.
There are no guarantees of either the amounts or duration of the proposed direct aid, and the prospects of it being paid look far from realistic when those in this House who are demanding it most vociferously are also insisting on further budget cuts.
Landmændene nægter at lade sig mase på dette narremarked, hvor de hverken får smør eller råd til at købe det.
The farmers are not going to stand for being taken in by this deal, which gives them the worst of both worlds.
De forventer af Parlamentets valgte medlemmer, at de i højere grad lytter til deres problemer og anmoder dem om at sende et klart signal til Rådet om, at reformen af landbrugspolitik ken ikke må forværre situationen, men skal give dem fremtidsudsigter.
They expect their Members of the European Parliament to pay more attention to their problems and to send a clear signal to the Council of Ministers calling for a reform of the common agricultural policy that does not make matters worse but offers them prospects for the future.
Vore ændringsforslag vil bestræbe sig på at bidrage dertil.
That is what we shall be trying to do in our amendments.
Kommissionen har ikke kunnet eller villet binde sig med klare svar på disse spørgsmål.
The content of your proposals is therefore ambiguous.
Det er de taget til Paris og til Rom for at sige.
You are in fact proposing three policies.
Vi lovgiver navnlig for 4 Ά mio. landmænd på over 55 år, som ofte forlader landbruget uden at have en efterfølger.
First there is an unchanged policy, with quotas, setaside and all the other familiar features.
Jeg kan ikke præsentere denne reform for mine vælgere uden at nævne, hvilke konsekvenser den vil få for Uvsvilkårene i Andalusien.
Then there is a policy that has been made even harsher, with prices cut by up to 35%.
Derfor forlanger jeg af Kommissionen, at den giver mig nøjagtige oplysninger herom, så jeg har mulighed for at vurdere grundlaget for denne reform.
And since we are expected to swallow this, you are also dangling a carrot in front of us.
Disse mennesker har, hr. MacSharry, selv om de har behov for indkomster, frem for alt behov for værdig hed, og jeg tror ikke, at det forslag, De fremlægger, opfylder denne betingelse, og derfor er der brug for et modforslag.
This is the cosmetic policy, with early retirement arrangements for two million farmers over the age of 65.
Det er det, der er uacceptabelt.
This brings us to the heart of your proposals.
De støtter dem med støtte på samme måde, som rebet holder den hængte! Deres problem er, hr. MacSharry, at samtidig med at De laver kompromiser, taber De princip perne af syne.
To make up for the loss of income caused by the reduction in prices, compensatory payments of up to ECU 253 are to be made, with complex rules to distinguish between small producers, professional producers, etc.
Men principperne er meget enkle.
Mr Dowing, in one of his moments of delirium, has even proposed interest-bearing bonds.
Første princip er først og fremmest Europas uafhængighed i fødevaremæssig henseende.
Why not have shares as well, so that farmers can float themselves on the stock exchange and get involved in takeover activity ?
Man er ikke uafhængig, når man importerer 20 % af landbrugs produkterne. De har gjort Europa afhængig, for så vidt angår soja og erstatningsprodukter.
MARTINEZ (DR). — (FR) As you are in a better position than anyone to know, Commissioner, we are legislating for 8.5 million European farmers who are worried and in despair.
Andet princip er fællesskabspræferencen. Overhold den, hr. MacSharry!
They made that clear when they took to the streets in Paris and Rome.
Fortæl Europa-Parlamentet, hvor meget det budgetmæssigt koster at have givet afkald på landbrugsafgiften på en hel række produkter. Tredje princip er sande priser. Kun markedet vil kunne redde landmændene.
More specifically, we are legislating for 4.5 million farmers over the age of 55, many of whom will have no successor to hand over to when they retire.
De konfiskerer den merværdi, landmændene bringer, for at give den til industrien.
And now of course we come to the really disastrous consequences.
Fjerde princip er ligeUg fordeling af indkomsterne.
I am not referring to the additional bureaucracy involved in counting cows, counting sheep.
Man kan ikke lade alle få øgede indkomster og drive landmændene ud i fattigdom.
I am not referring to the increase in fraud, which is bound to arise since some countries will be able to maintain checks, others not.
Femte princip er at gøre sig til herre over handelsstrømmene.
No, what is disastrous is the proposal to make farmers and their futures dependent on a line in the budget.
Deres problem, hr. MacSharry, er, at De ikke er Europas kommissær, men kommissær for amerikanske interesser! esser!
If they are made to depend on aid out of the budget for a living, they face the threat of having their fate decided, of being put out of business, by a trade-off in the course of the budgetary procedure resulting in abolition of this aid.
Først Deres forslag.
Let us look at your proposals first.
De anfører en hel række grunde til retfærdiggørelse af Deres plan.
You claim all sorts of grounds to justify them.
Hvad er det for grunde, De anfører?
What are the reasons you give ?
De siger til os, at den fælles landbrugspoUtik først og fremmest skal reformeres, fordi den intensive produktion har ødelagt miljøet.
You tell us that the first reason why the CAP must be reformed is that intensive production has destroyed the environment.
Men det er da ikke nyt!
But that has not happened overnight !
Dernæst siger De til os, at det er de store brug, der nyder godt af den: 80 % af støtten fra EUGFL går til 20% af bedrifterne. Men det var det mål, der var opstillet, for De sagde til os, at det var nødvendigt at være konkurrencedygtig!
The next point you make is that the CAP works to the benefit of large farmers, with 80% of EAGGF support going to 20% of farms.
NavnUg siger man til os — hr. Vohrer har netop gentaget omkvædet — at landbrugspoütikken er dyr: 35 mia. ECU etc. Men det er forkert!
Above all, we are told — and Mr Vohrer has just taken up the refrain — that the common agricultural policy is costly: ECU 35 billion, and so on. But it is not true !
I forhold til EF's BNP 4 000 mia. udgør landbrugsbudgettet 0,6%.
Community GDP amounts to ECU 4000 billion, and the budget for farming takes 0.6% of that.
Er det for meget?
Is this too much ?
I forhold til den merværdi, landmændene tilfører, udgør landbrugsbudgettet en tredjedel.
This budget amounts to a third of the value added by farmers.
Landmændene lægger tre gange så meget på bordet, som de modtager!
What the farmers put in is three times as much as they take out.
Dernæst siger man til os, at lagrene er meget dyre. De anfører endog taUet 3,7 mia. ECU.
You also tell us that storage is very expensive.
Men 3,7 mia. ECU er 0,001% af EF's BNP, og så siger De, det er for dyrt!
But ECU 3.7 billion is 0.001% of Community GDP, and you think that is too much.
Makroøkonomisk set udgør Deres lagre en usynUg udgift.
In macroeconomic terms, the cost of storage is invisible.
Det er for øvrigt så sandt, at den pohtik, De foreslår, med dens kompensationer vil være Uge så dyr.
And in any event the policy you are proposing, with your compensation, will cost just as much.
Og her er det, Deres plan bUver meget farUg.
So your budgetary argument is not very convincing, and I think
Ordningen har spillet falht!
That is what is unacceptable.
Medens udgifterne er tredoblet i løbet af ti år, er antallet af landbrugsbedrifter halveret.
Your compensatory payments will support farmers in the same way as a scaffold supports a condemned man.