natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Carvalho Cardoso (PPE), skriftlig. — (PT) Vi støtter Kommissionens direktivforslag, der gennem overvågning af og kontrol med kreditinstitutternes store engagementer søger ikke alene at afværge alvorlige kriser i kreditinstitutter, men også at for hindre konkurrenceforvridninger mellem disse institutter. tutter.
WUSENBEEK (LDR), chairman of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities. — (NL) Madam President, I would ask you, or rather I would ask Parliament's services, to take another close look at the translations of Rule 5, para­graphs 3 and 3 A, of the new texts.
Carvalho Cardoso mentarisk immunitet — dvs. havde beskyttet et af det magthavende flertal truet medlems ytringsfrihed — ville det næppe være kommet så vidt.
GOLLNISCH (DR). — (FR) The House will allow me to heap coals of fire on my head, but if the majority of members had respected Parliament's previous and con sistent rulings on the matter of parliamentary immunity, that is to say the protection of a member's freedom of expression in the face of a more powerful majority, we would doubtless not be in the mess we are in now.
Direktivet havde brug for nogle ændringsforslag, så det kunne blive mere ligevægtigt og effektivt.
So I must end by asking the Assembly to support the agreed proposals as a whole and by reiterating, in the most vigorous terms, the need for the Council to deal with this matter.
Det var netop det, ordføreren gjorde i sin udmærkede betænkning, og dermed er det oprindelige forslag betydeligt forbedret.
The citizens of Europe are increasingly aware of the need for rational arrangements in this area. They are essential for re-establishing the prestige of politicians, and the Council cannot stall any longer.
Vi vil navnlig fremhæve:
I am sorry that one of them was rejected.
Den anden interessante bestemmelse i betænkningen er den, der forpligter medlemsstaternes myndigheder til at underrette Parlamentet om konsekvenserne af eventuel ophævelse af et af dettes medlemmers immunitet.
The second interesting provision in this report is the one which obliges the Member State authorities to report to Parliament on the consequences of any waiver of the immunity of a Member of this Parliament.
Det skal siges, at en sådan bestemmelse, især hvad angår det franske parlament og de foran staltninger, det gentagne gange har truffet, specielt over for vor gruppeformand Jean-Marie Le Pen, ville give Dem overordentligt nyttige oplysninger.
In the case of the French Government in particular and the legal proceedings it repeatedly institutes against the chairman of my group Jean Marie Le Pen, this provision would be extremely useful and informative to us.
(Forslaget til lovgivningsmæssig beslutning vedtoges)
CORNELISSEN (PPE), rapporteur. — (NL) Madam President, I am not in a position to put forward my view on behalf of the Committee on Budgets.
Da den franske regering ikke gør det, vil jeg tillade mig at gøre det.
Since the French Government will not say it, I will.
Parlamentet fandt det rigtigt at ophæve Jean-Marie Le Pens immunitet for udtalelserne om hr. Durafour.
This House saw fit to waive Jean Marie Le Pen's immunity over what he had said about Mr Durafour.
De franske domstole fri kendte imidlertid hr. Le Pen ud fra den betragtning, at hans udtalelser alt i alt var tilladelige i betragtning af dem, som hr. Durafour tidligere havde fremsat om os.
The French courts absolved Mr Le Pen on the grounds that what he had said was in fact justifiable in the light of what Mr Durafour had said about us.
Parlamentet ophævede — og heller ikke ved denne lejlighed blev det større derved — hr. Le Pens parlamentariske immunitet, fordi han i en artikel om miljøet havde givet udtryk for den tanke, at det var varmegrænsens stigning og ørkendannelsen, der tid ligere havde foranlediget araberne til at drive sørøveri.
This House also saw fit — and did itself no credit here either — to waive Mr Le Pen's parliamentary immunity for having said, in an article on the environment, that it was the intensity of the heat and of desertification which, in bygone times, drove the Arab peoples to piracy.
Denne udtalelse havde overhovedet intet med racisme at gøre, idet den henførte sørøveriet til rent saglige forhold, som ikke var karakteristiske for araberne.
That was in no way a racist remark since it put the blame for that piracy squarely on objective factors and not on the Arab peoples themselves.
Ja, den afgørelse traf ...
But that was the decision...
Wijsenbeek (LOR), formand for Udvalget for Forretningsordenen, Valgs Prøvelse og Medlemmernes Immunitet. — (NL) Fru formand, jeg beder Dem, eller egentlig mere tjenestegrenene allerede nu om endnu en gang at se nøje på oversættelserne af artikel 5, stk. 3 og 3a (nyt).
Thus, following the Council decisions of last Monday, this Parliament has concluded the Community's decision-making process enabling the Commission to carry out a special food aid programme for a number of countries that are under serious threaten of hunger, particularly in Africa.
Ja, jeg er godt klar over, at det ikke behager Dem ... men den afgørelse traf de franske domstole.
Yes, I know you don't like that... but that is what the French courts decided.
Det samme gælder den sidste sag om Jødisk Internationale.
The same applies to the recent matter of the ?Jewish International'.
Den franske regering anså udtalelsen for fuldt ud lovlig og tilladelig.
The French Govern ment considered what was said as perfectly legitimate and admissible.
Bare De dog ville tage ved lære deraf!
So like it or lump it!
GoUnisch (DR). — (FR) Med mine kollegers tilladelse vil jeg yderligere forøge min upopularitet, men hvis et flertal af dem havde respekteret Parlamentets hidtidige og konstante praksis med hensyn til parla
Thus, the Council and the Parliament have, by mutual agreement, adopted a new rate of increase of nonobligatory expenditure for the 1992 budget, under the terms of Article 203(9) of the EC Treaty.
Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado (PPE), skriftlig. — (ES) PPE-Gruppen glæder sig over, at denne betænkning har opnået en bred konsensus, hvilket altid er at foretrække i forbindelse med forretningsordensmæssige spørgsmål og i endnu højere grad, når det drejer sig om et så ømtåleligt emne som ophævelse af immunitet.
Two proposals did not obtain a wide enough consensus; the points they dealt with were not essential, they were simply an attempt to take up what is already parliament
Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado cielle program for fødevarehjælp til en række lande, der trues af hungersnød, navnlig i Afrika.
DURÃO BARROSO because the Commission official who was with us could not tell us anything definite.
To andre forslag drejede sig om betingelserne for beslutningsdygtighed i forbindelse med hemmelig afstemning og om følgerne af forkastelse af et forslag; man har ikke ment, at tiden endnu var inde til at vedtage disse forslag, og PPE-Gruppen har tilsluttet sig denne forsigtige holdning.
The Committee urges the Commission to look again as soon as possible at the points which have proved contentious here and to put forward a new proposal without delay.
Disse forhandlinger — uden tvivl hårde — førte til sidst til et for alle parter acceptabelt resultat.
These no doubt arduous negotiations finally produced a result that was acceptable to all involved.
Disse forhandlinger beviser endnu en gang, at når alle de involverede parter har vilje dertil, kan man altid finde en løsning, der tager hensyn til fællesskabsinteresserne.
These negotiations demonstrate once again that, with the good will of all those involved, it is always possible to find a solution that protects Community interests.
Derfor vil jeg gerne takke alle dem, der har bidraget til succesen, navnlig de omtalte parlamentsmedlemmer samt hr. Schmidhuber.
I make a point, there fore, of thanking all those involved in this success, particularly the above-mentioned Members of the House, as well as Commissioner Schmidhuber.
Jeg vil også rette en tak til Parlamentets Budgetudvalg, der næsten enstemmigt godkendte den betænkning, der nu er vedtaget.
My acknowledgement extends also to the European Parliament's Committee on Budgets which gave almost unanimous support for the report which has just been approved.
Afslutningsvis anmoder jeg medlemmerne om at støtte de vedtagne forslag og understreger på det kraftigste nødvendigheden af, at Rådet tager fat på dette spørgsmål.
COLLINS (S), Chairman of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection. — Madam President, I should like to correct the impression that Mrs Schleicher has just given.
(Forslaget til afgørelse vedtoges) *
This common position is entirely unsatisfactory.
A3-181/92) af Cornelissen for Bud getudvalget om revision af de finansielle overslag og forslag til tillægs- og ændringsbudget nr. 2/92
I should like as chairman of the committee to explain exactly how we have come to our point of view.
Nu da det er god kendt, er der definitivt givet grønt lys til dette specielle fødevarehjælpeprogram til bekæmpelse af den største hungersnød i dette århundrede.
Now it has been approved, Madam President, the green light has definitely been given for this special food aid programme to combat the greatest famine this century has known.
60 mio mennesker i Afrika er truet af hungersnød.
Sixty million people in Africa are threatened with starvation.
Jeg retter da også en indtrængende appel til Rådet og Kom missionen om nu at forene alle kræfter, således at fødevarerne hurtigst muligt når frem til de mennesker, der har brug for dem.
I therefore make an urgent appeal to the Council and Commission to combine their forces so that the food reaches as quickly as possible the people who need it.
Afrika skriger efter levnedsmidler, millioner af mennesker risikerer at dø!
Africa cries out for food, the threat of death hangs over millions of people!
Det er nu op til Rådet og Kommissionen også at gøre brug af de muligheder, som vi har skabt.
It is up to you. Council and Commission, to make use of the possibilities that we have created.
Cornelissen (PPE), ordfører. — (NL) Jeg har ikke mulighed for at fremkomme med min opfattelse på Budgetudvalgets vegne.
At the last meeting of Parliament in Strasbourg we agreed to send this back to committee so that we could hear the opinion of Parliament's legal services.
Jeg overlader gerne valget til Parlamentets medlemmer.
The Committee shared the doubts expressed by the legal service about the compatibility of the footnote which is contained in this common position with the Treaty of Rome and, in particular, we doubted its compatibility with Article 30.
A3-141/92) fra Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Ret tigheder om Rådets fælles holdning (dok. C3-76/92 — SYN 255) med henblik på vedtagelse af en forordning om indførelse af et supplerende beskyttelsescertifikat for lægemidler (Ordfører: Merz)
A3-141/92) from the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, on the common position adopted by the Council (C3-76/92 — SYN 255) with a view to the adoption of a regulation concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (Rapporteur: Mr Merz)
(Formanden erklærede den fælles holdning for god kendt)
(The President declared the common position approved)
A3-108/92) fra Udvalget om Økonomi, Valutaspørgsmål og Industri politik om Rådets fælles holdning (dok. C3-47/92 — SYN 328) med henblik på vedtagelse af direktiv om etablering af ONP-vilkår for faste kredsløb (Ordfører: Read)
A3-108/92) from the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, on the common position adopted by the Council (C3-47/92 — SYN 328) with a view to the adoption of a directive on the application of open network provision to leased lines (Rapporteur: Mrs Read) approved
(Formanden erklærede den ændrede fælles holdning for godkendt)
(The President declared the common position as amended)
A3-145/92) fra Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og For brugerbeskyttelse om Rådets fælles holdning (dok. C3-5/92 — SYN 296) med henblik på vedtagelse af et direktiv om sødestoffer til brug i levnedsmidler (Ordfører: Caroline Jackson) reproduktion i fare, er allerede rejst — men ikke besvaret af Kommissionen — og om fodnoten der for ikke er helt overflødig.
The question has already been raised — but it has not been answered by the Commission — exactly how the directive, minus the footnote, would jeopardize the traditional production of foodstuffs as the Council claims, and whether the footnote is not, therefore, entirely super fluous.
Vi er meget forbløffede over, at Kommissionens Juridiske Tjeneste tilsyneladende er indstillet på at tolerere en fodnote, der er helt uforenelig med frihandelsforpligtelsen i artikel 30.
We are absolutely astounded that the legal service of the Commission is apparently prepared to tolerate a footnote which is absolutely incompatible with the free trade commitment of Article 30.
Sagen rejser også et institutionelt spørgsmål.
There is also an institutional question raised by this affair.
Jeg vil gerne gentage Parlamentets Juridiske Tjenestes synspunkt, som går ud på, at vi faktisk fik grunden til en sådan bestemmelse foræret af hr. Bangemann selv på sidste møde under hans forsøg på at forsvare den.
I want to reiterate the view of Parliament's legal service that the reasons for such a provision were actually given away at the last meeting by Mr Bangemann himself in trying to defend it.
Hr. Bangemann sagde: »Man spørger os om årsagen til fodnoten; vi medtog det ikke i selve teksten, idet De da ville få ret.
Mr Bangemann said: 'We are asked why a footnote:we did not put it in the text because then you would be right.
Parlamentet ville have sagt, at hele proceduren hørte hjemme et andet sted, fordi det var noget helt nyt.« Med andre ord sagde hr. Bangemann, at grunden til, at det behandles i en fodnote, er, at det faktisk er ulovligt; det står i fodnoten udelukkende for at bringe Kommissionen ud af en knibe; det står i en fodnote, så Kommissionen ikke behøver at høre os igen, for hvis det havde stået i selve teksten, ville det have været et nyt forslag. Det er hr. Bangemanns egne ord.
Parliament would have said that we would have to continue the whole procedure elsewhere because it was something entirely new.' In other words, Mr Bangemann said that the reason it is dealt with in a footnote is that it is in fact illegal; it is in the text only to get the Commission out of a fix; it is in the text so that they would not have to reconsult us because if it were in the text it would be a new proposal.
Det kan De se i forhandlingsreferatet.
You can read it in the Report of Proceedings.
Schleicher (PPE). — (DE) Fru formand, vi har i Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse besluttet at henvise forslaget til fornyet udvalgsbehandling. Nu vil jeg gerne spørge Kommissionen, om den drager konsekvenserne deraf og så hurtigt som muligt forelægger et nyt forslag, for det kunne den tilstedeværende kommissionstjenestemand ikke oplyse noget om.
Recommendation for a second reading (Doc. A3-145/92) from the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on the common position adopted by the Council (C3-5/92 — SYN 296) with a view to the adoption of a directive on sweeteners for use in foodstuffs (Rapporteur: Mrs Jackson)
Hvis det har været Kommissionens hensigt at undgå en ny høring om noget helt nyt ved at forvise bestemmelsen til en fodnote, så tager den sandelig noget let på sine institutionelle forpligtelser.
If the Commission intended to avoid the need for a reconsultation on something entirely new by relegating the provision to a footnote, then it would be taking its institutional duties very lightly indeed.
Faktisk reducerer den sig selv fra at være Traktaternes ansvarsbevidste vogter til blot at være en lusket deltager i protektionistiske og bureaukratiske manøvrer — hverken mere eller mindre.
Indeed it would be reducing itself from the responsible custodian of the Treaties to a shabby collaborator in protectionist and bureaucratic manoeuvring — no more, no less.
Collins (S), formand for Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse. — (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne korrigere det indtryk, som fru Schleicher netop gav.
SCHLEICHER (PPE). — (DE) Madam President, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Con sumer Protection voted to reject the proposal.
Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse stemte ikke om henvisning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling.
I would ask the Commission whether it has learned from that and will be putting forward a new proposal as soon as possible.
Vi stemte for helt at forkaste den fælles holdning og ikke blot om at få den henvist til udvalget, hvor vi kunne diskutere den igen.
Moreover, both the Council and the Commission are obliged by the Treaty to inform the European Parliament
Den fælles holdning er helt utilfredsstillende.
COLLINS fully of the reasons which led the Council to adopt its common position and also of the Commission's position.
Vi ønsker selvfølgelig at kende Kommissionens synspunkt.
used in special cases in the past.
Som udvalgets formand vil jeg gerne nøjagtigt forklare, hvordan vi er nået til denne opfattelse. telse.
Mr Collins has also explained why footnotes are sometimes needed, and this case illustrates that need very clearly.
Det skete ikke, fru formand!
Madam President, this has not been done!
Det er Miljøudvalgets opfattelse, at forklaringen er undvigende og utilstrækkelig.
It is the view of the Environment Committee that the explanation is evasive and inadequate.
Nogle medlemmer har faktisk sagt, at den er bevidst undvigende og svævende.
Indeed some Members have said that it is deliberately evasive and inadequate.
Jeg ved, at nogle medlemmer er bekymrede over diætprodukters fremtid.
I know that some Members are worried about the future of dietary preparations.
Jeg ved, at en kommissær er skyld i, at et kendt medlem af Parlamentet er blevet intimideret til at prøve på at overtale nogle tyske medlemmer til at samtykke. Jeg appellerer til Dem på hele Parlamentets vegne.
I know that one Commissioner has been responsible for a leading Member of this Assembly to be bullied into trying to convince some German Members into acquiescence.
Denne afstemning drejer sig om demokrati.
This vote is about democracy.
Denne afstemning drejer sig om Europa-Parlamentets status og anseelse.
This vote is about the status and the standing of the European Parliament.
Medlemmerne bør ignorere intimideringen og tænke over, hvordan de ønsker, at Europa-Parlamentet skal være.
Members should ignore the bullying and think what they want the European Parliament to be.
På Parlamentets sidste møde i Strasbourg enedes vi om henvisning til fornyet udvalgsbehandling, så vi kunne høre Parlamentets Juridiske Tjenestes opfattelse.
In this case the problem was that a product was manufactured using a traditional method, and this traditional method would not have been banned under the directive we were proposing.
Vi har nu modtaget en udtalelse fra Parlamentets Juridiske Tjeneste.
I made that point on several occasions and I would ask Mrs Jackson to take note of it once more.
Tirsdag formiddag i denne uge holdt Miljøudvalget møde, og vi drøftede den mod tagne udtalelse.
But the existence in a Member State of legislation which, without infringing Community law, makes a method of that kind compulsory, and the existence of an option for everyone to use that method or not, are two different things.
Jeg foreslår derfor forkastelse af den fælles holdning for derved at give Kommissionen mulighed for at retablere sin anseelse, at være åben og ærlig og frem for alt demokratisk.
I therefore want to move the rejection of this common position and thus give the Commission the chance to reinstate its reputation, to be open, to be honest and above all, to be democratic.
Formanden. — Hr. Collins, Deres anmodning er klar.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Collins, you have made your request quite clear.
Jeg appellerer til vore kollegers samarbejdsvilje.
I would appeal now to all our colleagues.
Der er ikke tale om at indlede en ny forhandling.
We do not wish to embark on a fresh debate.
Forhandlingen har fundet sted. Vi står over for et klart forslag.
The debate is already taking place.
Men jeg vil alligevel kort give ordet til hr. Beumer som ordfører for udtalelsen og til fru Jackson, som også er ordfører.
I am nevertheless going to give the floor briefly to Mr Beumer, because he was the draftsman of an opinion and to Mrs Jackson as rapporteur.
Derefter hører vi hr. Bangemann, og så tager vi stilling til det af hr. Collins fremsatte forslag.
We will then hear from Mr Bangemann and then vote on the proposal which Mr Collins has just made.
Som i andre tilfælde ønskede vi fortsat at sikre den traditionelle metode.
We wanted, as in other cases, to preserve this traditional method.
I Rådet var der til at begynde med næsten absolut flertal imod den traditionelle metode.
In the Council there was initially almost an absolute majority against this traditional method.
Først da Rådets medlemmer mærkede, at de i andre tilfælde med tilsvarende produkter ville få de samme problemer, ændrede de mening, og der opnåedes et om end knapt kvalificeret flertal for fodnoten.
Only when the Council members realized that they would have similar problems with similar products in other cases did they change their minds, and voted by a — slender — majority in favour of this footnote.
Det kom i stand ikke så meget på grund af det produkt, vi forhandler om, men som følge af det princip, at det indre marked ikke kan være ensbetydende med, at nationale specialiteter skal forsvinde, fordi lovgivningen tvinger medlemslandene til at afskaffe dem.
It was approved not so much on account of the product under discussion here, but more on account of the principle that the Common Market must not mean that national specialities disappear because our laws force Member States to cease making them.
Jeg blev noget forbavset, da der under forhandlingen, som desværre ikke kunne finde sted med samme besætning, pludselig indledtes et angreb mod Kommissionen, som ellers altid er blevet kritiseret for ud fra bureaukratisk arrogance at ville lade nationale produkter forsvinde fra markedet.
I was rather surprised when the debate, regrettably not led by the same people, suddenly launched an attack on the Commission, which had hitherto always been criticized for seeking to remove national products from the market for reasons of bureaucratic arrogance.
Her troede jeg, at jeg ville blive fejret som det fælles markeds differentierings store helt!
I thought I would be lionized here for diversifying the Common Market!
Men det blev desværre ikke tilfældet.
But alas, not so.
Caroline Jackson (PPE), ordfører. — (EN) Fru formand, jeg tror, at det i denne sag er meget vigtigt, at kommissæren ikke får det sidste ord.
BEUMER (PPE), draftsman of an opinion for the Com mittee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy. — (NL) Madam President, the Economic Affairs Committee has not taken any decision on whether or not to adopt the common position, but we have approved amendments and one of them is a clear rejection of that footnote, for we believe that it creates confusion.
Har De mulighed for at give mig ordet efter hr. Bange mann?
I believe that this makes for clarity, that it prevents precedents being established, and I consider it useful to make this standpoint clear to you.
Bangemann, medlem af Kommissionen. — (DE) Fru formand, Kommissionen har teoretisk ret til at bede om ordet når som helst, men jeg vil ikke gøre det efter fru Jackson.
JACKSON, Caroline (PPE), rapporteur — Madam Pre sident, I think it is very important on this issue for the Commissioner not to have the last word.
Den kendsgerning, at hun har anmodet om, at jeg taler først, tager jeg som et kompliment.
Would it be possible for you to give me the floor after Mr Bange-
Jeg kommer så til min anden bemærkning om fodnotens indhold.
This brings me to my second comment on the content of the footnote.
Mine damer og herrer, kære hr. Collins, selv om jeg har forståelse for, at De ønsker et velfungerende indre marked, så er det jo trods alt vor fælles sag.
Ladies and gentlemen, Mr Collins, I do appreciate that you want an internal market that works properly, we all do.