natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For det fjerde vil vi gøre det klart, hvordan den indkomstsituation er, som vore producenter fra 1993 kan forvente på grundlag af vore kornpris- og indkomstkompensationsbeslutninger i dag.
I would remind the Commissioner for Agriculture of the potentially disastrous consequences of the Dunkel proposals in the GATT talks.
Dermed fastlægger vi samtidig normen for indkomstsituationen for prisåret 1992/1993.
If these go through, it will mean an extra quota reduction of at least 10% and price cuts of 10% too, which will mean a reduction of 30 to 40% in farmers' incomes.
Landbrugs udvalget tilsluttede sig allerede med stort flertal et ændringsforslag fra vor side, der gik ud på dette.
I know, Commissioner, that you too are fighting it, and I can only encourage you, now the GATT talks have
Til slut endnu en gang tilbage til Rådet. Vi har allerede Kommissionens prisforslag på bordet.
How is it possible that in collective bargaining workers everywhere are negotiating increases of 4, 5, 6 or more percent and COPA has to accept that these price cuts now being proposed cannot be reversed by Parliament.
Det er klart, at Rådet endnu ikke har vedtaget reform forslagene.
That is because the farmers' unions no longer conduct price negotiations themselves, because they no longer have a say in the matter, because they have abrogated that power to the politicians, to the political parties with whom they are hand in glove.
Vi bliver nødt til endnu en gang at klare det igangværende produktionsår 1992/1993 med den gamle runde, men man bliver nødt til at se sammen hængen: Den, der vil have ro med hensyn til land brugsfondene og sørge for større sikkerhed med hensyn til GATT, bliver nødt til hurtigt at træffe en beslutning nu.
Heereman made a fine speech on the Place de Bordeaux but he is himself a member of parliament who helped get these things through in the German Bundestag.
Maj måned må ikke gå, uden at Rådet træffer klare beslutninger, både hvad angår priser, og hvad angår reformer.
For the Greens the only fair prices are social and ecological prices and to secure these we are calling for special levies, that is to
Simone Martin (LDR). — (FR) Hr. formand, i går kom der næsten 30 000 bønder fra de fjernest beliggende bedrifter og egne for at udråbe deres bekymring og håbløshed.
VERBEEK say ECU 200 per tonne for cereals, ECU 0.40 for a kilo of milk and ECU 3.5 for a kilo of meat. That will give us proper world market prices and farmers' production prices.
Hvordan kan vi, som hr. Bocklet sagde, overhøre denne appel?
not the essential ones.
Som jeg alle rede mange gange har haft lejlighed til at sige det, er jeg overbevist om, at det, selv om den fælles land brugspolitik givetvis bør tilpasse sig markedsudviklingen, ikke, som vi gør det, er sundt at give efter for det amerikanske pres, hvis mål dag for dag tegner sig tydeligere for os. Men ej heller anser jeg hr. MacSharrys indstilling om at lade forbrugeren erstatte af skatteyderen for at være sund.
The essential issue is that the current policy as pursued to date does not limit production enough and so the Socialist Group has right from the start given its full support to the Commissioner and the proposals he made here a year ago for tackling the cereals dossier, because we knew that halfway solutions would no longer be enough.
Lord Plumb (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, denne korte forhandling om hr. Bocklets anden betænkning sker på baggrund af en fortsat alvorlig situa tion for landbruget generelt.
GUILLAUME (RDE). — (FR) Mr President, I wish to tell the Commissioner that it was a real challenge making improvements to these texts, whose basic thrust is open to question, since they aim to replace a system of payments to farmers with a complex, regionalized aid system.
Som fru Martin netop sagde, så marcherer landbrugerne ikke i gaderne i tusindtal for deres gode helbreds skyld.
We have nevertheless used every available means to improve them, amendments in particular.
De har rigelige muligheder for at få motion i løbet af deres normale arbejdsdag uden det.
One of the amendments calls for a higher premium for sunflowers than for oilseed rape, since sunflowers are a crop grown in dryer regions which offers lower productivity, so that the premium per hectare ought to be larger.
Under vore langvarige forhandlinger under en tidligere mødeperiode brugte vi en ufattelig mængde tid — som vi efter min mening spildte — på at stemme os igennem omkring 700 ændringsforslag. Siden da har Kommissionen foreslået, at priserne fra sidste år videreføres med undtagelse af ændringen for oliefrø og justeringen af priserne på og medansvarsafgiften for korn.
But the task you have set us, Commissioner, is all the more difficult in that we still have the GATT sword of Damocles hanging over our heads and you have no prospect of convincing us that if an agreement were reached in those negotiations, you would not come back to us with proposed adjustments to bring the policy we are discussing today into line with the GATT arrange ments.
Vi har derfor to resterende produkter, vi skal beskæftige os med her i dag — korn og mælk.
We realized that and we are increasingly prone to difficulties, which does not help agriculture.
Det drejer sig om to af de væsentligste landbrugsprodukter.
That was the starting point for my group in our assessment of the Mac Sharry proposals.
Det ene er som produkt forbruger af det andet.
On that basis we said we would support them.
Mælkekvoterne har, som vi jo nok ved, utvivlsomt medført et fald i produktionen.
Account has been taken of the question of incomes, but there is the problem of production too.
De har medvirket til stabilisering af markedet, men den begrænsning, der er tale om, kan kun opvejes gennem prisen.
And any member of the House who fails to see that is blind to reality and not helping towards a constructive solution but being positively unhelpful.
Så hvis vi vedtager en yderligere nedskæring af kvoterne, så må der justering til i form af en belønning på markedet.
I am putting this in such blunt terms, Mr President, because I feel we really do have to reach a solution now.
I denne forbindelse, hr. kommissær, vil jeg gerne tage et af Deres argumenter op.
That goes for the ministers in the Council of Ministers too, who are still dithering at the moment and saying give us time.
Det er forkert at sige, at 80 % af støtten går til kun 20 % af producenterne.
Minister Bukman is one of them.
Realiteten er, at støtten går til en ringe del af produktionen, så den kan eksporteres, hvilket tillader os at opretholde en høj pris.
Give us time because this is a very important matter. Yes, it is, but this very important matter has been with us since 1986.
Hvis Deres forslag, som De påstår, reelt har til mål at holde så mange producenter som muligt på deres jorder, så er det praktisk talt hele produktionen, der nu skal støttes.
It has to be resolved now and no one has come up with better proposals than Mr Mac Sharry.
Har vi råd til det? For hvis en bestemt form for landbrug tjente så mange penge, som De antyder, ville det være kendt, og der ville ikke år efter år forsvinde så mange aktive landbrugere.
That is why we said we could accept his proposal.
Derfor kan jeg ikke acceptere de selvmorderiske nedsættelser, som De foreslår for kornets vedkommende, og jeg stemmer for det ændringsforslag, der vil holde nedsættelserne på 15%.
But this task becomes impossible following the success of the United States over the oilseeds panel and the rejection of the new scheme adopted at the end of 1991, which called in particular for modifications, in which case we would find ourselves in the position of having to pay financial compensation to the United States under the threat, which has already been used, of reprisals.
Jeg stemmer for de af Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter foreslåede lempelser, hvad angår braklægning, tilskyndelse til mere ekstensivt land brug samt forpligtelsen til fuld og varig udligningsstøtte. støtte.
But it was the Americans who outflanked you, rejecting your new system for oilseeds on the grounds of insufficient decoupling and at the same time nipping your entire reform of the common agricultural policy in the bud, having called in question the entire architecture on which it was based.
Korn er et andet problem. Forbrugerne — ofte landmænd — ønsker at købe det billigt, og producenterne ønsker et rimeligt afkast af det.
In the circumstances, Commissioner, it would be as well if you would clear this matter up, since the work we are doing is a waste of time unless you tell us how you are going to get out of this deadlock with the United States.
Ser vi på den aktuelle situation, har de såkaldte stabilisatorer ikke stabiliseret, medansvarsafgifterne har blot været en afgift på produktet og har ikke medført en lavere produktion.
These are, firstly, a clear element of production control to tackle production in such a way that the high level of overproduction is drastically reduced.
Vi står hele tiden over for en ny situa tion — nye varianter og produktionsteknikker sætter fortsat afgrøderne i vejret, og teknologien letter vore høstproblemer. Men vi har, som vi alle ved, et voksende budgetproblem.
Secondly, it contains an income element which is kept separate from the price mechanism.
Jeg har aldrig troet på, at produktionen kan holdes i ave gennem prisindgreb alene.
Thirdly, because it may be helpful to the GATT talks, and all those who say here that Mr Mac Sharry is not bothered about that are missing the point, because as you know agriculture is in a bad way and there are other interests in society and the Community which will bring such great pressure to bear that we have to cooperate in the GATT talks.
Tendenserne i de udgiftsmæssige bevillinger sker oftere på grundlag af klimatiske forhold eller valutakursudsving, som ikke har langsigtet betydning.
All honour to the Commissioner for having realized that we have to advance, take steps to go on to the offensive and not always be defensive.
Indførelsen af braklægningsordningen har på trods af store forskelle mellem medlemsstaterne betydet en væsentlig nedbringelse af de opdyrkede arealer, hvilket har bidraget til at nedbringe Fælles skabets nuværende lagre.
That is why we say the compromise may be helpful to the GATT talks and why we shall support it. Fourthly, this proposal offers a solution to the problem of ever-increasing intensification in agriculture.
Men enhver form for tvungen braklægning er ganske uacceptabel for mig, ligesom også den diskriminerende forskelsbehandling af forskellige brug og forskellige størrelser brug er det.
The use of pesticides and artificial fertilizers is increasing at a spanking pace, to increase production under the policy we are currently pursuing.
Med hensyn til braklægningsordningen bør vi tage ved lære af den stop-go politik, man har fulgt i Amerikas Forenede Stater i årenes løb.
That has to be stopped and for that reason too we said that we supported the Mac Sharry proposals.
Altså bør der åbnes en dør til håbet og fremtiden.
We have been discussing it since 1985.
Afsætning til industrien udgør en sådan dør, og vi bør både inden for forskning og anven delse gøre alt for at nå dette resultat.
It was finally decided in 1987 that no more than 160 million tonnes could be produced in the Community.
Jeg gentager det, som hr. Bocklet sagde før, nemlig at reformen af den fælles landbrugspolitik kun kan gennemføres med de pågældende, dvs. bønderne.
We are moving towards 200 million tonnes of cereals and no one has an answer ; nor has Mr Verbeek who raises all manner of issues but
Vi ønsker ikke at afgiftsbelægge effektivitet, vi ønsker at få mulighed for og spillerum til fortsat at producere det, markedet ønsker.
We are happy with the compromise because it includes the most important elements of the Mac Sharry proposals.
Derfor er alle uden undtagelse enige om, at vi må og skal reformere den fælles landbrugspolitik. Vi må opnå en verdensomspændende aftale gennem GATT.
But, and we differ from the Christian Democrats in our interpretation of the amendment but we can argue about that later, this must of course be just a first step, a first step prompted by international developments, by the GATT talks, and there may well be further steps.
Og her i Parlamentet er der, som vi har hørt under disse forhandlinger, åbenbart 518 forskellige måder at gøre dette
But this first step is vital and I urge the Council one last time to take some decisions, because
Spørgsmålet er for mig ikke så meget, hvorvidt vi skal reducere prisstøtten med 20, 25, 30 eller 15% over en periode, det er snarere anvendelsen af res sourcerne, det kommer an på.
So I have to be honest and say this is surely unacceptable. We need Community preference, but we must also share the burdens equally and abide by the rules.
Det, vi skal gøre, er at overføre disse ressourcer til den grønne kasse, og jeg tror, vi kan skabe stabilitet og igen skabe tillid til landbrugserhvervet og give de unge landmænd en rimelig start.
otherwise 19921993 will be another year lost and we cannot afford to lose another year.
Det, der virkelig betyder noget, når alt kommer til alt, er ikke priserne, men udbyttet.
We thus believe Parliament must give its backing to Mr Mac Sharry so that we can offer the farmers some kind of a future in the sense that they can see which way things are going.
nedsættes, og støtteforanstaltningerne mindskes, men til gengæld indføres der kompenserende foran staltninger, og landbrugerne modtager en direkte indkomststøtte, der kompenserer for prisnedsættelsen«.
FUNK (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I feel the conclusion to be drawn from all the statements that have been made this morning is that we must get the agricultural reforms moving. There is no point just talking about them.
I modsat fald vil der ikke blot komme tusindvis af landbrugere og protestere uden for Europa-Parlamentet, men mange flere vil i nærmeste fremtid protestere hjemme i deres respektive lande.
Mr Commissioner, you have my support when you say we must not become GATT's plaything. We will lose all our credibility if we introduce a system, and eight days later some committee or other that was never elected by us decides it does not like what we have decided.
Informationerne må forbedres, og først og fremmest må der føres tilsyn med, at gennemførelsen af reformen ikke er i modstrid med de principper, som Parlamentet forsvarer.
We cannot make policy like that. We will be turning even more people out into the street if we constantly retreat and never have the courage to go on defending good decisions in the future.
Som en ivrig duks har Parlamentet imidlertid taget afsked med de løbende for handlinger med et MacSharry-sammenstik uden at fremlægge så meget som begyndelsen til varige løsninger til en landbrugsreform.
The protest that is spreading here is a protest not only against price reductions but also against the Commission's and Parliament's inability to take action. That is surely the decisive point.
Domingo Segarra (GUE). — (ES) Hr. formand, indledningsvis skal jeg understrege GUE-gruppens interesse i, at disse forordninger nu endelig vedtages, fordi det er nødvendigt for landbrugerne, at refor men træder i kraft — om end der ligger visse selvmodsigelser heri — og ikke mindst fordi det er nødvendigt for Rådet, der stadig er fanget i modsætningsforholdet mellem nationale interesser og GATT-forhandlingerne.
If I tell a farmer that for the time being he has to live with price reductions, for which he will be compensated, he at least knows where he stands. But if I tell him we are planning something, and all that happens is that prices are reduced — nothing else has happened so far, there have been no miracles, only price reductions — he will say: I do not believe what you are saying any more.
Reformen af den fælles landbrugspolitik må have sit eget idégrundlag ved siden af de aftaler, der indgås i GATT-regi, da det i modsat fald klart vil blive til ulempe for Fællesskabets landbrugssektor.
Losing its credibility is the worst thing that can happen to a Parliament.
Ansvaret herfor bærer hovedsagelig den hemmelige store koalition mellem de kristelige demokrater og socialdemokraterne, uden om hvilken intet kan lade sig gøre i Europa-Parlamentet.
MAHER (LDR). — Mr President, one fact is clear: farmers have always been the strongest supporters of the European Community and of further integration of the countries of the Community.
De to grupper har på ingen måde og på intet tidspunkt draget MacSharrys system med radikale prisnedsættelser i tvivl.
Some of them have even begun to vent their frustration on the Maastricht agreement, wondering whether they can afford to vote in favour of it or not, even though it has nothing directly to do with agriculture.
De er med til at fremme en politik, som i hele verden vil føre til en devaluering af landmændenes arbejde og deres produkter, til ødelæggelse af smålandbrug og til øgede miljøgener.
All this indicates how frustrated they are. Of course it is completely wrong to suggest that they are frustrated only with their present position.
Vi har altid givet udtryk for, at det var nødvendigt at rationalisere sektoren og at forvalte overskuddene på en mere hensigtsmæssig måde, men vi mener ikke, at de instrumenter, der nu foreslås, er de optimale.
They are exceedingly fearful about the future, because they do not want to become budget dependants. I am not surprised at the Socialists advocating this kind of policy.
De har ikke nogen klart positiv effekt.
They were always in favour of the handout mentality.
Og navnlig må det sikres, at denne reform — prisnedsættelse, godtgørelsessatser, begrænsninger — ikke modarbejder en målsætning, som Parlamentet klart fastholder, nemlig opretholdelsen af landbrugernes indkomstniveau, navnlig for de små og mellemstore landbrugs vedkommende.
Mr Mac Sharry may of course say that the support is going to them anyway, but the way they get that support is very important—it must be through the marketplace.
Parlamentet har uophørligt understreget, at denne samfundsgruppe må bevares af sociale, økologiske og territoriale grunde.
The Commission too must be credible, because it cannot live in an ivory tower for ever, believing that it is protected by thick panes of glass.
Lad os da være konsekvente og vedtage de ændringsforslag, der specielt tager sigte på at tilgodese denne gruppe inden for landbrugssektoren!
That is not the way it is. As time passes, the public are also going to the Commission, not only Parliament, and demanding that we justify our inactivity.
Et fortsat faldende prisniveau for landbrugsvarer tvinger ikke kun i Europa stadig flere landmænd til at give op.
But we must not just draw up plans for them: we must also try to introduce them in the market, so that there is a sign that something is happening.
Det, vi for øjeblikket oplever i landbruget, er ikke mere strukturændring, det er strukturbrud.
The European Community will be able to reduce support by two, three or four per cent whenever they like.
Den næste generation ser åbenbart heller ikke nogen mulighed for en professionel fremtid på de såkaldt bæredygtige landbrug.
That is what is likely to happen. We already have examples of this in the west of Ireland, where a dole mentality has been created.
Antallet af unge under uddannelse hos os taler sit dramatiske sprog, og det gør tendenserne til afvandring fra landbruget i den tredje verdens lande også.
Many of the people do not want to work any more. They have become so psychologically dependent on the handout mentality.
En mangel ved disse forordninger er, at de er lineære og ensartede, selv om de omhandler en yderst for skelligartet virkelighed.
My farmers also want to grow more tobacco. We only grow 10% tobacco and smoke far too much — Ido not, but others do.
Opmærksomheden må der for i særlig grad rettes mod områder og regioner inden for Fællesskabet, der fremstiller andre produkter end korn og mælk, og som har andre produktionsbetingelser.
We have to be honest with the farmers and tell them they cannot grow more tobacco because we have reserved this product for the Spanish and the Italians.
Og frem for alt er det nødvendigt at involvere landbrugerne i gennemførelsen af reformen, da det er en nødvendig betingelse for dens succes.
The cooperatives, the young farmers' organizations, and other representative bodies are all disagreeing with the approach being adopted and we ignore them at our peril !
Reformen må ikke blive en institutionel tvangsmekanisme, der presses ned over en erhvervssektor.
There is an explosion waiting to happen unless we listen to them. They are in favour of quotas.
Den må gennemføres med landbrugerne, og det må klart siges, at: »Priserne
Let us have quotas right across the board, and let us make them work.
Der klages til stadighed over Europa-Parlamentets manglende rettigheder og over, at det ikke har noget
It functioned quite well, it could function even better if we made sure that it was applied fairly in all the countries.
Vi klager over hhv. sofa- og protestvælgere, men landmændenes sammenslutning indbyder landmænd til at demonstrere i Strasbourg under mottoet: »Stands MacSharry!« Den kristelige demokrat von Heereman finder stærke ord som landbrugspræsident.
In addition, the annual premium granted for dairy cows should only be given for up to a maximum of 60 animals, provided the density does not exceed 25 normal head per hectare, with exemption for this condition for producers whose reference quantity is below 60,000 kilograms.
For at folk inden længe overhovedet skal have noget at vælge, bliver man nødt til at sige dem, hvor det bærer hen, og gøre sandheden om situationen på landbrugsområdet klar for dem.
And the sum of this premium, from 1993, should be 75 ecus per animal.
Hvis de eksisterende partier i Europa fortsat sælger halm som guld, oven i købet med en radikal attitude, behøver vi ikke at bekymre os om demokratiets krise — eller over at krisen fortsætter — forstået negativt.
There are some hidden problems here, particularly in my own country.
I går aftes mødtes jeg her i Parlamentet med nogle repræsentanter for vore egne landbrugerorganisationer fra Irland, og det var et meget konstruktivt møde, jeg havde med dem.
The lower the price of cereals the less competitive are beef products which are produced on grass.
Vi må i vor reform sørge for, at produktionen bliver markedsrelateret.
That is a very big problem in Ireland. The Irish economy stands on the cloven hoof.
Vi må formindske vor afhængighed af interventionen.
Most of the beef in Europe is produced on cereals.
Hvis vi går fra interventionsprodukter til markedsrelaterede produkter, så vil vi naturligvis øge beskæftigelsen.
Finally, Mr President, there is a catastrophe waiting to happen south of the Sahara.
Det tror jeg, der er mange, der har mistet af syne.
The worst drought in living memory is now developing.
Dette må føre til en mindre prisreduktion, samtidig med at kompensationerne gøres permanente.
Are we going to be in a position to help those people ?
Hvis priserne går ned, må vi have en permanent udligningsordning på plads, og det skal gøres, så det er synligt.
We may need a lot of the cereals we have, unless we are going to let those people die as we let a lot of Ethiopians die.
Under vore hidtidige diskussioner med Rådet og Kommissionen er det lykkedes os at få indført ændringer, som medfører, at reformen bliver mere acceptabel for landbrugerne på familiebrugene.
Finally, Mr President, it falls to us to draw the attention of the Commission and the Council to those regions which are at a particular disadvantage, such as Portugal and Spain, whose agriculture has to be protected from possible negative backlashes of reform which might hinder or even halt the respective gradual integration programmes that are being implemented, thereby avoiding the risk of making many of the investments effected with the financial support of the Community itself financially inviable.
Jeg vil støtte det kompromis, der skal stemmes om her i dag med hensyn til korn, for jeg tror, at det er et skridt i den rigtige retning.
To sum up, let us take the view that the CAP has worked reasonably well.