natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Derfor går vi ind for en europæisk rundbordssamtale for at undersøge følgerne af den teknologiske viden og den teknologiske kunne og for at se, om de stemmer overens med en ny etisk tankemodel.
European public opinion, which you represent in this House, would I imagine find it difficult to understand if a disagreement over what they would regard as a minor financial matter — and that, candidly, can scarcely be disputed since the amount at issue is a very small proportion of the total Community budget — were to be allowed to prevent the two arms of the budget authority finalizing the 1990 budget in accordance with the five-year financial perspective which they both agreed upon little more than a year ago and has only been applied once.
For det femte, forsoningen mellem monokultur og egen kultur.
In paragraph 3 of the motion for a resolution adopted by your Committee on Budgets, it is pointed out, as though in sutprise, that the draft works out at only 0.98% of GNP!
Endelig — men absolut vigtigt — vil vi gøre forsamlingen opmærksom på den negative virkning, som opførelsen i artikel 100 — det vil sige en reserve — af en del af bevillingen til Namibia har.
But insofar as there is a ECU 9 billion margin, bearing in mind what I had to say just now about the ceiling, this margin has materialized largely because of the special situation that has arisen in regard to farm spending.
Vandemeulebroucke (ARC). — (NL) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, Fællesskabet har stået i forsoningens tegn.
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I feel I must make the point that the success of a contract depends on its reliability.
Spørgsmålet er, om vi kan udvikle det hen imod en række nye forsoningsmomenter.
There is a Latin tag that is taught in law faculties in France and I imagine in various universities across Europe, since Latin was of coutse the Esperanto of the embtyonic Europe: pacta sunt servanda.
For det sjette, forsoningen med de fire verdens hjørner. Vi befinder os allerede utvetydigt i perioden efter Jalta.
It is my belief, ladies and gentlemen, that the Community has set its sights too high to be prepared to exist for any length of time in a provisional budgetary situation.
Fred gennem nedrustning for alle, fred gennem udvikling for alle og fred gennem selvstyre for alle.
Do wc want the Poles and Hungarians to doubt the word of free nations and in consequence, according to a certain logic, to lose faith in the virtues of democracy in the free world ?
I denne sammenhæng er vi selvfølgelig glade for tal lene fra Polen og Ungarn, men vi må også se på situationen i den tredje verden.
This is of course not blackmail, please give me credit for that, but I am looking at the situation from a commonsense point of view.
Rådet har nedskåret alt for meget i områder for udviklingssamarbejde såsom støtte til Latinamerika, støtte til ikkestatslige organisationer, støtte til flygtninge, støtte til Asien samt støtte til frontlinjestater. Der må hurtigst muligt gøres noget ved dette, og derfor vil vi støtte ændringsforslagene fra Udvalget om Udvikling og Samarbejde.
Public opinion in those countries has taken some very hard knocks, and what we are dealing with here is the teality of how our actions are perceived by nations that are awakening to freedom, that have suffered the most dreadful hardships, and, believe me, these people have nothing but hope, however tenuous, however impalpable, with which to
Når tolv mennesker i Ministerrådet træffer beslutninger om 320 millioner borgere, må også strukturerne gøres acceptable.
As for what your colleague said about drugs, I have to take issue with you, Mr Langes, when you say that the Council reduced the amount proposed by the Commission for the campaign against drugs.
Vi havde for nogle dage siden i München en konference for lokale og regionale ledere.
The amount proposed to Council was ECU 900 000, and this was accepted by Council.
Disse regionale ansvarlige er egentlig Europas fremtid, men det genfinder vi ikke i den europæiske beslutningsproces, og dem finder vi heller ikke i retningslinjerne for fremtidens nye Europa.
So absolutely no reduction was made, and I am sure this must be a mistake on your part rather than criticism of the action taken by the Council, which went along with exactly the amount the Commission was asking for, and no doubt Mr Schmidhuber, the Commissioner for the budget, will bear this out.
Efter i går aftes at have overværet det sidste arbejde i Budgetudvalgets første fase og efter opmærksomt at have fulgt indlæggene her til formiddag på plenarmødet har jeg kunnet konstatere, hr. formand, at der med Forsamlingens budgetforhandlinger er gen nemført en ret så fuldstændig analyse af Fællesskabets problemer. De kan være overbevist om, at jeg skal overbringe den nøjagtige ordlyd til mine kolleger i Ministerrådet.
For my own part, I think I can assure you that the Council — yes, Mr general rapporteur, you can rest assured that I will be reporting to it faithfully on what you have told me in the course of our various discussions — that the Council will honour its responsibilities so that the Community can function normally strictly in accordance with the commitments it entered into with you last year.
Charasse, formand for Rådet. — (FR) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, det er i dag anden gang jeg har den ære at være tilstede på Parlamentets plenarmøde i forbindelse med budgetproceduren for 1990.
Mr President, I now wish to say a word in response to each of the speakers, so that they can be certain that the President-in-Office was listening to what they had to say.
Som De sikkert erindrer, forelagde jeg de 12. september her i Parlamentet det forslag til budget, der blev vedtaget den 28. juli af Rådet, og jeg sagde den gang, at resultaterne af Rådets arbejde skulle ses i et dobbelt perspektiv.
I was listening very carefully to the quite outstanding speech made by Mr Lamassoure, who also dwelt on the subject of Poland, telling me that my recourse to the negative reserve was a piece of accounting sleight of hand. Not at all!
Jeg vil gerne gøre opmærksom på, at formand skabets hovedopgave i de kommende uger går ud på at bevare det interinstitutionelle samarbejde intakt.
The first speaker was Mr Colom i Naval, who made an extremely interesting speech in which he discussed a series of policies and asked the question : are we going to have a dialogue on all these subjects ?
De lægger, så vidt jeg kan se, op til at overskride loftet i punkt 4 i de finansielle overslag med dels 300 mio. ECU i bistand til Polen og Ungarn og dels 200 mio. ECU til de nye politikker.
I think that, since the start of this budgetary procedure, I have provided enough evidence of my availability to discuss matters with Parliament and.with each and every one of you, ladies and gentlemen, for you to have no doubt as to my intentions.
Dvs. i alt 500 mio. ECU, og den vigtigste følgevirkning heraf forekommer mig at være, at der lægges op til en generel og snarlig revision af de finansielle overslag.
I hold Parliament in too high regard to fail in my duty to engage in dialogue.
Men når alt kommer til alt, er vi kun ved førstebehandlingen, og det er ikke forbudt at udstikke spor.
Be that as it may, Mr Colom i Naval, I am ready to carry on the dialogue.
Hr. formand, efter vores møde i september er der kommet et nyt element til — og hvis jeg skulle have glemt det, ville dette møde have genopfrisket min hukommelse — nemlig Fællesskabets beslutning om at yde massiv og hurtig hjælp til Polen og Ungarn.
But no, he did not. Nevertheless, Mr President, I have not lost hope that, by the end of this debate, someone will tell me why 300, or what is going to be done with this figure.
Det forekommer mig, at Kommissionen og Rådet har reageret med eksemplarisk effektivitet på, hvad der må siges at være en større politisk hastesag, hvilket Parlamentet jo til overflod har understreget, idet der kun gik fjorten dage mellem forelæggelsen af ændringsskrivelsen og Rådets vedtagelse.
I hope that piece of sophistry will make the point for me that I would like this debate between us to be rather more reasonable, which does not mean that I am dismissing in advance what I am going to be told on Thutsday about the motives of your Committee on Budgets for proposing an increase from 200 to 300, but 1 do think I should also be given an explanation of the difference between 200 which is non-political and 300 which is political !
Jeg insisterer specielt på dette punkt, for jeg mener at ane en lille selvmodsigelse i Budgetud-
So my response to Mr Langes, who said the figure had to be 300, is to answer with a question : why 300 ?
Det andet punkt er, at indholdet i de finansielle overslag er en integrerende del af aftalen.
Mr President, I have tried to be as brief as possible in my answers.
Det er anført i artikel 5 i aftalen.
I look forward to our next meeting on Thursday.
valgets konklusioner på et punkt, der er af central politisk betydning i den interinstitutionelle aftale.
IN THE CHAIR : MR ANASTASSOPOULOS not imagine the Community is going to be ungenerous.
Han skrev ligeledes, at når det drejede sig om at fastlægge en stabil finansiering frem til 1992, »udgjorde den febrilske, natlige budgetaktivitet ingen garanti for resultatets kvalitet«. Og han tilføjede tre linjer længere nede: »Færdig med fuskeri, gode påfund, de små timers poesi«.
TOMLINSON (S), general rapporteur. — Mr Pre sident, I deliberately reserved part of my speaking time because I thought the President-in-Office would have something that required a reply.
Kræver, hr. for mand, men man kan kun kræve noget, der er obligatorisk, og dvs. ikke noget, der er fakultativt.
It was done for the sake of something that all of you want: application and observance of the Single Act.
Men jeg formoder, at der er tale om et problem i forbindelse med den franske oversættelse, hvis ikke, oh, hr. Schmidbauer, så stakkels Kommission.
If we were to change them every year, it could be back to the days of negotiating into the small hours referred to by Mr Cot, besides which implementation of the Single Act might be compromised. promised.
Hvis jeg havde ret til at klappe i denne sal, ville jeg også klappe ad hr. Jean-Pierre Cot.
I answered him, Mr President, in my previous speech to the House and have nothing to add.
Under alle omstændigheder viser Kommissionens forslag, der allerede er blevet iværksat og derfor selvfølgelig vedtaget af Rådet, vedrørende Polen og Ungarn, at Rådet kan gå med til, at en nyopstået politisk prioritet, der ikke var forudset, da aftalen blev undertegnet, kan medføre en justering af de finansielle overslag.
At the beginning of his speech he expressed two desires, which he reiterated from his previous speech: the desire to make sure that the Community had the financial resources and a desire to cooperate with Parliament. The Community has the resources but we cannot use them adequately.
Det væsentligste spørgsmål, som vi skal svare på under denne budgetprocedure, hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, er, om denne aftale, hvis betydning alle anerkender, og som hidtil kun er blevet bragt i anvendelse en eneste gang, knap femten måneder efter at den blev undertegnet af vore institutioner, stadig anses for gældende af Parlamentet.
I say to him again that the Council adopted the Commission's proposal. The rest of his speech, like Mr Cochet's, was about a family matter, but it is only very much as a makeshift that I lump them together in this family matter, since I imagine that there cannot be many other family matters on which they see eye to eye!
I begrundelsen i det udkast til ændringsskrivelse jeg tilstillede Parlamentet på Rådets vegne, står der højt og tydeligt, hr. formand, at Rådet vurderer, at revisionen af de finansielle overslag for 1990, og jeg citerer : »Begrænses til IOU-underloftet som anført i punkt 4 og beløbet til finansiering af hjælp til genopbygning af Polen og Ungarn«.
Mr Miranda da Silva complained about ECU 200 million set aside for Poland according to the negative reserve doctrine, asking whether the figure was put at 200 million because that it is the negative reserve ceiling. I would simply say to Mr Miranda da Silva that it is a happy coincidence, as the recipients have said, between the limits of the negative reserve and those of the recipients' satisfaction.
Når Rådet accepterede princippet om en revision for at finansiere bistanden til Polen og Ungarn, skyldes det, at denne operation svarede til uforudsete omstændigheder, uforudsete selv på det tidspunkt, hvor vi underskrev aftalen — det var en af historiens overraskelser — og at der var tale om en politisk hastesag, og Europa-Parlamentet bidrog i stort omfang til at bevidstgøre om denne karakter af uopsættelighed.
Finally, Mr Vandemeulebroucke said he was pleased about Poland and Hungaty, but unhappy that the Council had cut back excessively on funding for other poor countries.
Vi foreslog derfor at tage tilflugt til
I wish to say that the Council very largely went along with the Commission's proposals in
Jeg vil derfor lidt ondskabsfuldt sige til nogle af de tilstedeværende, og afgjort til hovedordføreren, som ikke vil tage mig det ilde op, at man ikke ustandseligt kan tage denne institutionelle aftale til indtægt — som han har gjort, som jeg selv hørte i går, og som det står skrevet i forslaget til beslutning — og samtidig ustandseligt anmode om, at den ændres eller endog splittes ad.
I have to say that this House rejects the arrogant assumption of the Council that only the Council of Ministers — that glorious body — is capable of having a political thought. When it decides on 200 million that is an act of consummate political wisdom.
Enten eksisterer denne aftale, man støtter sig til den og bevarer den, eller også må den ændres, men man kan ikke gøre begge dele på en gang, hr. Tomlinson !
But when, by an overwhelming majority, all political groups in this House combine on a different point of view — although some of the political groups have also had discussions with Poland and Hungary and perhaps even closer contacts than members of the Council of Ministers — that is an act only worthy of the Council's contempt.
De 200 mio. ECU er til rådighed, som De har anmodet om! Polen og Ungarn betragter dem allerede som en kendsgerning.
The interinstitutional agreement is not something we are seeking to dismantle.
Vi skal nu høre, at af grunde, som vi forstår, men som er så subtile, at de ikke vil kunne forstås uden for Parlamentets mure, tøver man, stiller metoden til debat, kort sagt forsinker midlernes ankomst til målet.
It is something we are seeking to change in accordance with the provisions ofthat interinstitutional agreement.
Hr. Tomlinson, der er så god til at regne, at han kunne være æresborger i Auvergne, siger: »Mellem 1,18% og 0,98% er der en margen på 9 mia. Godt, dem supper jeg!« Men denne margen på 9 mia. er, med forbehold af hvad jeg sagde for lidt siden om loftet, en margen, der er opstået som følge af den særlige situation i forbin delse med landbrugsudgifterne.
And I really must take exception, on behalf of every Member of this House, to the fact that when we assert our right to change the interinstitutional agreement in accordance with its tetms, the Council seeks to interpret that as this House repudiating its word and going back on its undertakings.
Groft sagt halvdelen, idet den anden halvdel stammer fra Fællesskabets bedre økonomiske resultater, hvilket betyder, at 1,18% i de fattige lande er mindre end 0,98% i de lidt rigere, for at tale et sprog som alle forstår!
That is a calumny, it is a falsehood and it is something that I hope the President-in-Office will stand up and withdraw in this House.
Tillad mig at bemærke, hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, at aftaler kun har betydning for så vidt som de er stabile.
It is a deliberate falsehood and it is not worthy of a representative of the Council of Ministers.
Der findes et latinsk udtryk, som man lærer på de juridiske fakulteter i Frankrig og formodentlig også på andre europæiske universiteter, efter som latin havde status af esperanto i et Europa under opbygning : Pacta sunt servanda.
Mr President, in conclusion, the President-in-Office said he found it hard to follow my approach.
Hvordan kan udvalget så hurtigt mene, at der hersker ulige vægt mellem de forskellige kategorier i de finansielle overslag — med et udtryk fra Tomlinson-forslagets punkt 4, i hvert fald i den franske oversættelse — når disse overslag blev accepteret af budgetmyndighedens parter for mindre end halvandet år siden!
The Committee understood the approach, Parliament understood the approach and rather than denigrate it, it is now up to the Council to respond seriously to it.
Parlamentets Budgetudvalg anfører i sine betragtninger, at udgiftsloftet som fastsat i den interinstitutionelle aftale globalt udgør en lavere procentsats end forudset af Fællesskabets BNI.
We are saying absolutely clearly that the interinstitutional agreement is important; it is something that gave us a proper framework but it was a framework that was supposed to do two things.
Jeg har vanskeligt ved at følge hovedordførerens ræsonnement, men det skyldes nok, at jeg er mindre kompetent og desuden mere efemér end han.
It was supposed to produce a framework of budget discipline and it was also supposed to give flexibility in the operation of budgetary procedures.
Undskyld udtrykket, hr. formand, men franskmændene ved, at det i Frankrig har en venligsindet betydning, det er en stor fordel »at tilhøre den gamle garde i denne forsamling«, hvilket ikke gør sig gældende for mit vedkommende.
It is the Council of Ministers that ate now seeking to interpret this interinstitutional agreement as if it were a straightjacket.
Jeg har vanskeligt ved at følge ræsonnementet i indledningen til det forslag til beslutning, der i aftes blev vedtaget af Budgetudvalget.
PRESIDENT. — The President-in-Office of the Council has asked to speak again in the light of the severe criticism you have expressed.
I punkt 2 anføres det, at »budgetmyndighedens to parter inden for dette loft har ret til i fællesskab at træffe afgørelse om omfanget af Fællesskabets finansielle behov«, osv. Jeg gad vide, om ikke begge parter begår en fejl i forbindelse med begrebet loft fastsat til 1,18% af Fællesskabets BNI.
I know that those of us who come from continental Europe sometimes find it difficult to adapt to the very aggressive way in which political dialogue is conducted in Britain, and we have just seen an example of that, but I wonder, Mr Chavasse, whether you might ndt prefer first to hear the chairman of Parliament's Committee on Budgets, Mr von der Vring, as well, and then reply to both Mr Tomlinson and Mr von der Vring together ?
Når man skriver »i fællesskab at træffe afgørelse om omfanget af Fællesskabets finansielle behov«, så forstår jeg godt,
And the President-in-Office, instead of abusing this House and saying that we are seeking to defy and to deny the content of the agreement, because that is what he said, should be joining with us in saying to the Commission that the imperative demands of the
Men jeg håber, at Parlamentet ikke slår ind på denne vej, og jeg er fortsat fortrøstningsfuld.
The President of the Council comes out in defence of the Commission, but we must keep in mind where the responsibilities truly lie.
Svar på de store aktuelle samfunds problemer, såsom miljø, udviklingsbistand osv. Den europæiske offentlige mening, som De repræsenterer her, har sikkert vanskeligt ved at forstå, at et finansielt problem — som den vil anse for værende
As far as I can recall, this is the first budgetary procedure in which the confrontation between Parliament and the
Charasse opregning, vil jeg erstatte »afkald« med planlægning eller programmering for fremtiden, hvilket er mindre chokerende. Under alle omstændigheder er jeg enig med hensyn til dialogen, hr. Colom i Naval.
Commission has come to the fore, in which the Council is washing its hands of the affair like Pontius Pilate, although to some extent it is still — as the President of the Council did a moment ago — offering its protective mantle to the Commission, which slips into uneasy silence.
Hr. Langes, De siger: 300 mio. ECU til Polen.
But this is not very important. What I wish to say to the general rapporteur is that in our discussions on Poland — and I thought I had made myself clear earlier on — I am being told that ECU 200 million is not enough and that the figure has to be 300 m.
Hvorfor 300?
I am waiting to be told why it has to be 300 m, because I have to discuss this with the Council.
Jeg havde ventet 400 eller 500. Det er som i lotteriet.
You have to admit, Mr Tomlinson, that as yet you have not told me.
Jeg ventede og sagde til mig selv : Han vil fortælle, hvorfor det skal være 300.
No one has told me : it has to be ECU 300 million because that is the amount needed for this action or that.
Men der kom ingen forklaring, og jeg venter stadig på, at man inden denne forhandlings afslutninger siger mig, hvorfor det skal være 300.
I am quite sure the Council will not be impervious to this kind of reasoning, but it needs to be told clearly what the ECU 300 million is for.
Ellere rettere til hvilket formål.
So there is no point in getting angry or losing your temper!
Fællesskabet er alt for ambitiøst til i længere tid at leve med en budgetsituation af foreløbig karakter.
We were astonished when the Commission told us in the spring of this year that it did not consider a revision of the financial perspective to be opportune, basta.
Jeg vil sige det en gang til : Den polske og ungarske offentlige mening, som forventer så meget af Dem og af os, vil ikke kunne forstå, hvorfor den lovede hjælp eventuelt ikke når frem den 1. januar 1990!
We watched with mounting anger as the Commission put forward one proposal for a regulation after another, dealing with very important policies, without — and I would ask the President of the Council to listen carefully — requesting the resources which it had said would be needed.
Ønsker man, at den skal tvivle på frie folks ord og dermed, hvorfor ikke, når jeg siger, at jeg ikke er ude på at lægge pres på Parlamentet, men blot ræsonnerer ud fra sund fornuft.
This points to a remarkable disparity between political and budgetary planning at the Commission.
Vi har at gøre med en traumatiseret offentlig mening i disse lande, og hvad der her er på spil, er opfattelsen af troværdig heden af vore handlinger hos de folk, der nu vågner til friheden, folk, som er flået levende for ikke at bruge andre udtryk, og vi kan være sikre på, at håbet, det endnu så skrøbelige håb, i dag tjener som svar på de mest presserende problemer, som må løses nu.
And now the President of the Council comes here and tells us that the point at issue — Mr President, just allow me to spell it out, I really must do that, and I would hope that the chairman of the Committee on Budgets may also be allowed to express himself in forthright terms...
Jeg skal sige Dem hvorfor: Fordi da man meddelte beløbet 200 mio. ECU til Polen og Ungarn, sagde disse lande: Bravo, tak, det er præcist, hvad vi ønskede.
Secondly, the rapporteur said that I had told untruths about the interinstitutional agreement.
Derfor spørger jeg, hvorfor 300, når de er tilfredse med 200!
Please, Mr Tomlinson, let us not have such words between us !
Jeg ser, at hovedordføreren ryster på hovedet.
I did not tell untruths about the interinstitutional agreement.
Han finder nok en god forklaring på de 300 før torsdag.
I told you how the Council interprets this agreement.
Jeg vil under alle omstændigheder være tilstede torsdag for at høre disse grunde.
You told me Parliament's interpretation. We each have our own position therefore.
Jeg tror ikke — og jeg ønsker ikke at tro — at Parlamentet vil tage et sådant ansvar på sig, og jeg ved da også, at det ikke vil ske!
Reservations were expressed in the Council concerning the legality of using the negative reserve to provide funds for Poland and Hungary.