natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Disse skamløse dæmoner har et navn, I Frankrig kalder han sig Le Pen, i Belgien Nols og »Vlaams Blok«, og i de andre lande er det igen andre.
These shameless demons have a name, in France it is Le Pen, in Belgium it is Nols and in Flanders Blok, and in other countries they have different names.
Det er ikke gæstearbejderne, men disse dæmoner, som skal uddrives af Europa.
It is not the guest workers but these demons that should be driven out of Europe.
Mens Vetterbetænkningen blev drøftet i Udvalget om RetUge AnUggender, blev der gjort et nyt skridt fremad.
Where they are treated as marginals today in their living conditions, their neighbourhood and in services because they have no political voice, they will be respected tomorrow as citizens and be integrated in to a dynamic community which they will help to build.
Med glæde skal jeg i dag — hvad mange par lamentsmedlemmer, fru.
A further step forward was taken with the discussion of the Vetter report in the Committee on Legal Affairs.
Feuillet, hr. Marinaro og andre har bedt mig om — bekræfte, hvad jeg forpligtede mig tü den 21. oktober.
So I am only too pleased to confirm — as I have been asked to do by many Members, including Mrs Fuillet and Mrs Marinaro — the undertaking I made on 21 October.
Ved den lejlighed sagde jeg: »Jeg har givet vore tjenestegrene instruks om at forberede et dfrektivforslag vedrørendet tilkendelse af stemmeret til kommunalvalg i opholdslandet alene til borgere fra medlemsstaterne.
On that occasion I said: 'I have instructed my staff to draw up a proposal for a directive designed to recognize the right of citizens of the Member States only to vote in local elections in their country of residence.
Jeg forpligter mig personüg tü at forelægge Kommissionen dette forslag i løbet af første halvår af 1988«.
I undertake personally to submit that proposal to the Commission in the first half of 1988.'
Denne forpligtelse vil bUve overholdt, ærede parlamentsmedlemmer.
That pledge will be honoured, ladies and gentlemen.
Jeg vü gerne understrege, at vi i løbet af tre år vil have tilbagelagt den afgørende strækning, som har ført os fra udformningen af en idé til drøftelsen af den i de kompetente organer inden for rammen af vor lovgivningsprocedure.
I wish to point out the decisive progress we shall have made in the space of three years from the formulation of this plan to its discussion by the various bodies involved in our legislative process.
Naturligvis vil Parlamentet bUve op fordret til at udtale sig om dette forslag, dersom Kommissionen — hvad jeg håber — beslutter at lade det gå videre tü Rådet.
If, as I hope, the Commission decides to submit that proposal to the Council, of course Parliament will be called upon to pronounce upon it.
Gennem valgretten kan immigranterne tage skæbnen i deres egen hånd, i begyndelsen på det laveste niveau, nemüg kommunen.
If granting voting rights to EEC nationals is seen as a step towards grant voting rights generally, then I shall vote in favour, but if not then I shall abstain.
Ripa di Meana formelle foranstaltninger udelukkende på grundlag af indholdet i vor rapport.
Ripa di Meana mal steps with regard to the purely hypothetical pro posals it contained.
I denne forbindelse synes jeg, det var meget interessant at høre de betragtninger og hypoteser, som hr. Janssen van Raay og hr. Rothley fremsatte vedrørende Fællesskabets medlemssater og deres muligheder, idet de rejste tvivl om Fællesskabets kompetence på dette område, men alligevel foreslog en appel fra fællesskabsinstitutionerne i denne retning.
Consequently I regard as very interesting the comments and suggestions made with regard to the Member States of the Community and their powers by Mr Janssen van Raay and Mr Rothley, who question the Community's competence to take action in this field while suggesting that an appeal be made to the Community institutions.
A2-199/87) af Hoon for Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder om
A 2-199/87) by Mr Hoon, on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, on
Dernæst fordi dette bekræfter, at Kommissionen følger Parlamentet, især i en sag, der er så poUtisk følsom og betydningsfuld for udviklingen imod den europæiske union.
Moreover, this would confirm that the Commission is following Parliament's lead, particularly with regard to a subject that is so politically sensitive and important for progress towards European Union.
Der er faktisk al mulig grund til at tro — hvad debatten her i aften bekræfter — at Par lamentet ligesom allerede i juni 1983 og november 1985 med stort flertal vü udtale sig til fordel for for slaget.
As this evening's debate indicates, there is every reason to believe that, as in June 1983 and November 1985, a large majority of Parliament will vote in favour of the proposal.
Sidst, men ikke mindst — for det er efter min mening en yderst vigtig grund — fordi det drejer sig om en reel forpligtelse fra Kommissionens side til fordel for opbygningen af borgernes Europa. De vil kunne forstå, ærede parlamentsmedlemmer, at dette er et signal, som efter min mening må prioriteres.
Lastly — but, I believe, very importantly — this would represent a real commitment by the Com mission to breathe new life into the concept of a Citizens' Europe.
forslag fra Kommissionen (KOM (86) til Rådets henstilling om medlemsstaternes ratificering af Konventionen af 25. oktober 1980 om Lettelse af International Adgang til Domstolene.
I think, therefore, that we have made decisive progress towards achieving recognition of this basic citizens' right.
Jeg mener, at vi således har tilbagelagt et afgørende stykke vej i retning af anerkendelse af denne fundamentale borgerUge rettighed.
C 2-160/86) for a recommendation relating to ratification by Member States of the Convention of 25 October 1980 designed to facilitate international access to the courts.
Det bekræfter, som Kommissionen aUerede noterede i slutningen af sin rapport for 1986, at. en foranstaltning af denne art mere end noget andet vüle være et bevis på skabelsen og eksistensen af et Borgernes Europa.
This confirms, as the Commission pointed out in the conclusion of its report in 1986, that a measure of this kind would be more effective proof than any other of the creation and existence of a Citizens' Europe.
Overgangen fra den europæiske opbygning til så specifikt politiske beslutninger ville være betydningsfuld.
The transition from building Europe to making such specifically political decisions would be important.
Den ville være et bevis på, at videreudviklingen af den europæiske union kun kan ske sideløbende med forsvaret for demokratiet i Europa.
It would demonstrate that European Union can be strengthened only if it proceeds hand in hand with the defence of democracy in Europe.
Hoon (S), ordfører. — (EN) Hr. formand, på trods af den noget storslåede titel på dette forslag fra Kom missionen er det i virkeligheden en ret beskeden for anstaltning for at lette adgangen til domstolene for EF-Konventionen af 25. oktober 1980, der har til for mål at lette den internationale adgang til domstolene.
HOON (S), rapporteur. — Mr President, despite the rather grand title of this proposal from the Commission, it is in reality a rather modest measure to improve access to the courts for EEC citizens. It calls on Member States to ratify the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980, designed to facilitate international access to the courts.
Hensigten med Konventionen er, at de kontraherende stater skal garantere, at de yder retshjælp til bor gere fra andre kontraherende stater på samme betingelser, som de gør det til deres egne borgere.
The purpose of the Convention is to require the signatory States to ensure that they pro vide legal aid to the citizens of other signatory States on the same terms and conditions as to their own citizens.
Det er dog en ret beskeden foranstaltning, for så vidt som den er begrænset til civüe sager og sager ved handelsretter.
It is a rather modest measure, however, in that it is limited to civil and commercial proceedings.
Retshjælp i forbindelse med strafferetlige sager — nok det område, hvor der mest inøjnefaldende er brug for retshjælp — er ikke omfattet.
Legal aid for criminal proceedings — perhaps the most obvious area where legal aid is required — is not included.
Jeg vil gerne præcisere vort synspunkt angående to punkter, som har indtaget en central plads i indlæg gene.
I wish to clarify our point of view concerning two points that have been central to this debate.
Fru Fontaine og flere andre har spurgt, hvilken nøjagtig holdning Kommissionen regner med at ind tage i situationer, hvor statens myndighed og repræsentationen for spørgsmål af offentlig karakter bliver betroet til de folkevalgte, især til borgmesteren og hans medhjælpere.
Mrs Fontaine and other Members asked what exact solution the Commission envisaged in situations where State powers and responsibilities with regard to public order are delegated to elected officials, particularly mayors and their deputies.
For at fatte mig i korthed, fru Fontaine, kan jeg sige, at vor holdning er den, der er angivet i kapitel IV i rapporten og samlet under over skriften »Retten til valgbarhed« i det fjerde afsnit, hvor der netop tages hensyn tü undtagelserne.
As time presses, Mrs Fontaine, let me just say that the solution we suggest at present is contained in Chapter IV of the report under the head ing 'The Right to Stand for Election', the fourth para graph of which provides for exceptions.
Med hensyn til det problem, som mange har anset for centralt, og hvis poUtiske og symbolske betydning jeg ikke er blind for — jeg taler om stemmeret for bor gere fra tredjelande — må jeg understrege, at selv om jeg anser det for at være et overmåde betydningsfuldt spørgsmål, tror jeg ikke, det er formålstjenligt at rejse det i dag, så længe stemmeretten for borgere fra med lemsstaterne stædigt bliver bestridt og forhindret af flere af disse medlemsstater, sådan som vi for nylig har kunnet konstatere det, da flere medlemsstater traf
As for the problem that many speakers have regarded as crucial, and whose political and symbolic import ance does not escape me — namely the right of citizens of nonCommunity countries to vote — I must emphasise that, while recognizing that this is a major and important question, I do not think that it is appropriate to raise it at present, given that even the right to vote of citizens of the Member States is vigorously contested and opposed by some of those very States, as we in the Commission noted only recently when, in response to our report, some Member States took for
Kommissionen har efter min mening afgjort været overdreven beskeden i udarbejdelsen af sit forslag.
The Commission has undoubtedly, in my view, been unduly modest in framing its proposal.
Den har henstület til EF-medlemstaterne, at de skal underskrive en konvention udtænkt andetsteds, og ved at gøre det har den fralagt sig det vigtige ansvar at udarbejde forslag specielt med henblik på Fælles skabet.
It has called on EEC Member States to sign a convention drafted else where and in so doing it has given up the important responsibility of drafting proposals specifically for the Community.
Det vüle måske ikke have været nogen dårlig ide, hvis Konventionen var blevet begejstret modtaget ud over hele Vesteuropa som en generel erklæring om relevante rettigheder og ansvar.
That might be no bad thing if the Con vention had been enthusiastically received throughout Western Europe as a general statement of relevant rights and responsibilities.
Virkeligheden ser dog helt anderledes ud.
The reality is far from this, however.
Konventionen er ikke blevet positivt medtaget. Skønt Konventionen blev offentliggjort den 25. oktober 1980, var der den 13. november 1986, som er datoen for Kommissionens forslag, kun fire EF-lande, som havde underskrevet den — Tyskland, Frankrig, Grækenland og Luxembourg.
The Convention has not been received posi tively, although published on 25 October 1980.
Kun Frankrig havde taget det næste skridt, der bestod i en ratificering af Konventionen.
Only France had taken the next step of ratifying the Convention.
Et tegn på Kom missionens usikkerhed i denne sag kan måske ses i, at den har sat dette forslag i forbindelse med fremme
An indication perhaps of the European Commission's diffidence on this subject can
Hoon af turismen inden for Fællesskabet.
Hoon be seen from the fact that it has framed this proposal in the context of facilitating tourism within the Com munity.
Uden på nogen måde at vüle undervurdere turismens betydning inden for EF, vü jeg mene, at EF-borgeres adgang, eller mangel på adgang, til at opnå retshjælp så afgjort er af meget større betydning.
Without in any way underestimating the importance of tourism in the EEC, I would suggest that the availability or otherwise of legal aid to EEC citizens is obviously of much greater significance and impact.
At rejse frem og tilbage mellem medlemsstaterne er nu blevet helt almindeügt både af forretningsmæssige og af sociale årsager.
Travel between Member States has now become common-place both for business and social reasons.
Det er uundgåeUgt, at risikoen for retsforfølgning hele tiden foreügger.
Inevitably, in such circumstances the possibility of legal proceedings is ever present.
Den mest banale trafikulykke eller det mest banale tilfælde af personskade kan antage en forbavsende indviklet karakter, når borgere fra forskeltige lande er indblandet.
The simplest road traffic accident, personal injury case, can assume astonishing complexity where citizens of different countries become involved.
Endvidere er risikoen for strafferetUg forfølgning, der kan medføre fængsling i et fremmed land, et foruroligende perspektiv for en hver, hvad enten vedkommende findes uskyldig eller skyldig i en lovovertrædelse.
Moreover, the threat of criminal legal proceedings involving the possibility of incarceration in a foreign country is a disturbing pros pect for anyone, whether proved innocent or guilty of any offence.
Dette virker således forfordelende over for en udenlandsk sagsøger eller sagsøgt.
with the costs involved in attending one or more court hearings in a foreign State.
Under disse omstændigheder mener Retsudvalget, at selv om det foreliggende forslag fra Kommissionen kun lige er værd at støtte — om end ikke med stor begejstring, må jeg sige — kunne det alligevel udgøre et brugbart grundlag for fremtidige anstrengelser fra Kommissionens side med henblik på at give EF-borgere en omfattende ret til retshjælp.
In such circumstances the Committee on Legal Affairs believes that whilst the present Commission proposal is just about worth supporting, not with any great enthusiasm, I might say, nevertheless it could form a useful basis for future work by the Commission designed to give the EEC citizen a comprehensive right to legal aid.
Det skuUe være en ret, som gjaldt både civüe og strafferetlige sager i en hvüken som helst medlemsstat uanset borgernes hjem land.
That would be a right in both civil and criminal proceedings in any Member State irrespective of their country of origin.
Et nødvendigt udgangspunkt må være, at Kom missionen gennemgår de foreliggende muhgheder for at opnå retshjælp i medlemssdtaterne.
A necessary starting point must be a review by the Com mission of the existing availability of legal aid in the Member States.
Der ville ikke rigtig være noget formål med at udvide det nuværende retshjælpssystem til fremmede borgere, hvis det faktisk viste sig, at den retshjælp, borgerne i et givet land kunne opnå, var utilstrækkelig.
There would be little point clearly in extending the present system of legal aid to non-citizens if in fact the legal aid available to citizens in any particular country was inadequate.
Hvis man fandt, at kun en UUe del af befolkningen i en tilfældig med lemsstat faktisk var berettiget tü retshjælp af lovmæssige eUer finansieUe grunde, viUe det være nødvendigt for Kommissionen at fremkomme med mere omfattende forslag.
If it was discovered that only a small proportion of the population in any Member State actually qualified on legal or financial grounds for legal aid, it would then be necessary for the Commission to bring forward rather more com prehensive proposals.
Retsudvalget vil i særdeleshed gerne have Kommissionen til at sücre, af grunde som jeg håber jeg har gjort tilstrækkelig dybtgående rede for, at muUgheden for at opnå retshjælp skal foreligge for alle EF-borgere uanset deres nationalitet i forbindelse med alle sager, civile såvel som strafferetlige.
Specifically, the Committee on Legal Affairs would like the Commission to ensure for the reasons that I hope I have set out in sufficient detail the availability of legal aid to all EEC citizens irrespective of nationality in all legal proceedings, both civil and criminal.
Jeg glæder mig tü at høre fra kommissæren, hvilke skridt Kommissionen agter at foretage efter at have haft lejlighed tü at læse min betænkning.
I look forward to hearing from the Commissioner what steps the Commission proposes to take, having had the opportunity of reading my report in this respect.
Wijsenbeek (LDR). - (NL) H. formand, til forretningsordenen, jeg har netop set et af vore medlem mer, hr. Le ChevalUer, skrive under for et andet med lem, hr. Collinot.
WIJSENBEEK (LDR). — (NL) A point of order, Mr President. I have just seen one of the Members of this House, Mr Le Chevallier, signing in for another Member, Mr Collinot.
En sådan fremgangsmåde burde ikke forekomme i et Parlament som vort, og jeg anmoder Dem om at træffe de nødvendige foranstasltninger tü, at det ikke sker.
Such practices should not occur in a Parliament such as ours, and I ask you to take necessary steps to ensure that this does not happen again.
Formanden. — Hr. Wijsenbeek, det er klart en meget alvorUg sag, og det vil bUve undersøgt grundigt af administrationen.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Wijsenbeek, obviously it is a very serious matter and it will be thoroughly investigated by the administration.
Det drejer sig ikke bare om det indlysende problem med sproget.
There is not only the obvious problem of language.
Der er endvidere vanskelighederne for bundet med afstand, rejse, kultur og retspraksis.
In addition, there are difficulties of distance, travel, culture and of legal tradition.
Alt sammen noget, der kan bringe den enkelte procederende part, hvad enten vedkommende optræder som sagsøger eUer om sagsøgt, i en meget uheldig situation.
All of which may leave the individual litigant, either as plaintiff or defendant, at a considerable disadvantage.
Jeg vü gerne give en konkret ülustration af de problemer, der kan opstå.
I would like to give you a practical illustration of the problems that can arise.
For temmeUg mange år siden rejste en ung mand fra Derby i min valgkreds på ferie i Spanien.
A considerable number of years ago, a young man from Derby in my constituency went on holiday to Spain.
I løbet af hvad der viste sig at bUve en noget opstemt ferie, blev han anholdt på grund af en eUer anden fjoUet handling, som man under normale omstændigheder vüle have slået hen i spøg og så glemt.
In the course of what was a highspirited holiday he was arrested for some foolish behaviour which would nor mally have been laughed off and forgotten about.
Det var i hvert fald, hvad den unge mand mente.
That in fact was the view taken by the young man.
Desværre forklarede ingen ham rigtigt eUer tydeUgt nok, at han teknisk set var blevet løsladt mod kaution af de spanske myndigheder, og at man forventede, at han senere skuUe vende tilbage for at forsvare sig mod anklagen.
Unfortunately, no one explained to him properly or effectively that he had technically been granted bail by the Spanish authorities and that he was expected to return to answer the charge.
Da han derfor mange år senere efter næsten at have glemt alt om hændelsen vendte tübage til Spanien på ferie med sin forlovede, blev han straks arresteret og kastet i fængsel i 18 dage — ikke den bedste måde at starte sin ferie på!
Therefore many years later, having virtually forgotten about the incident, when he returned to Spain on holiday with his fiancée, he was promptly arrested and thrown into prison for 18 days.
Dette var for den forholdsvis alvorlige forseelse ikke at have opfyldt betingelserne for løsladelse mod kaution.
Not the most auspicious beginning to his holiday. This was for the relatively serious offence of failing to answer his bail.
For at finde en løsning på sagen blev han nødt tü at bruge mange tusinde pund både til rejseudgifter og til sagsomkostninger.
In order to resolve that matter he was required to spend many thousands of pounds in both travelling and legal expenses.
En banal hændelse, som så ledes blev til en alvorüg sag, blot fordi han havde fået utilstrækkehg juridisk bistand.
A trivial incident that therefore turned into a serious legal matter simply because insufficient legal assistance was obtained.
Derefter skulle en per son med begrænsede finansielle midler betale en hel del penge for at redde sig ud af en retsforfølgning, der i sidste instans kunne have ført til frihedsberøvelse. Dette var naturUgvis et skræmmende perspektiv, ikke mindst fordi han var mange hundrede lrilometer hjemmefra.
Thereafter, someone of limited financial means was expected to pay a great deal of money to extricate himself from legal proceedings which might have resulted ultimately in his losing his liberty.
Hvis han i første omgang havde fået forstående og dygtig juridisk bistand, kunne den sørgelige historie have været undgået.
If in the first place he had obtained sympathetic and effective legal advice that sorry saga might have been avoided.
Hvis muUgheden for at få retshjælp havde foreligget, ville der have været langt større sandsynlighed for, at han havde fået en sådan juridisk bistand.
If legal aid had been available, the likelihood of his securing such legal advice would have been con siderably improved. Moreover, the penalty of paying travel and legal costs to attend court hearings in another State would have veen avoided.
Endvidere ville straffen bestående i at skuUe betale rejseudgifter og sagsomkostninger for at deltage i retsmøder være blevet undgået.
It is perhaps stating the obvious to say that such costs are over and above any fine or order made by a court as punishment or compensation.
Cabrera Bazán (S). — (ES) Hr. formand, jeg skal gratulere hr. Hoon med betænkningen, hvor han med fingeren på det ømme punkt klart har påvist Haag-Konventionens utilstrækkelighed.
The fact that the aim and purpose of the Hague Con vention is exclusively to provide legal aid on the same terms and conditions as for nationals in relation to civil and commercial proceedings arising from clauses agreed by the contracting parties, speaks eloquently of its inadequacy.
Dette udgør uden tvivl en yderst vigtig begrænsning, såvel teoretisk som i praksis.
Cabrera Bazan which without question imposes a limitation of vast theoretical and practical importance.
Fra et retsvidenskabeUgt synspunkt er det en sand vüdfarelse, at hvad der indrømmes på det privatretUge område ikke anderkendes i offentlig ret.
From the standpoint of legal theory, it is nothing short of an aberration to fail to recognize within the field of public law what is recognized within private law.
Det logiske viUe være, at aUe borgere var omfattet af retten til retshjælp overfor andre staters offentUge myndigheder. der.
It would only be logical to extend the recognition of the right to legal aid in dealing with the public authorities of other States to all citizens.
Lafuente López (ED). — (ES) Hr. formand, det er altid rart for en jurist at konstatere Kommissionens omsorg for at skabe en ukompliceret, smidig og økonomisk retsadministration, som vi, uanset hvor en europæisk borger måtte befinde sig, må erklære os som tilhængere af.
LAFUENTE LOPEZ (ED). — (ES) Mr President, it is always satisfying for a jurist to hear that the Com mission is concerned that we should have a readily available, flexible and inexpensive legal service for all European citizens, wherever they may be. This is something we ought to vote for.
Derfor kan vor gruppe kun ud trykke vor store tilfredshed med det forslag, vi her har til overvejelse.
The proposal under consideration deserves nothing but praise as far as my group is concerned.