natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
GAREL JONES. — (EN) Hvad angår gennemførelse »i indeværende parlamentsperiode«, så foreslår jeg, at det ærede medlem går til nogle af sine politiske venner i Det Forenede Kongerige, for tidsplanen vil i vid udstrækning afhænge af regeringens mulighed for at få regler om begrænset taletid eller ophævelse af regelen om, at forhandlingerne normalt slutter kl. 22.
GAREL JONES. — So far as what completion "during this session" means, I suggest the honourable Member approaches some of his political friends in the United Kingdom because the timetable will depend to a great extent on the ability of the government to obtain closures or suspension of the Ten o'Clock rule.
Hans eget partis holdning til disse spørgsmål vil være meget vigtig hvad angår længden af den tid, som det tager for et lovforslag at komme gennem Underhuset. Jeg kan forsikre ham for, at det ikke vil skyldes mangel på beslutsomhed fra regeringens side.
The attitute of his own party to those matters will be quite important so far as the length of time that the bill takes to go through the House of Commons is concerned.
Hvad angår vekselkursmekanismen, har han nok opdaget den spekulationsbølge, der har ramt ikke bare det britiske pund, men også andre vesteuropæiske valutaer.
As far as the exchange rate mechanism is concerned, he will be aware of the wave of speculation that has hit not just the British pound but other cunencies in Western Europe.
Jeg tror, den britiske finansminister er blevet citeret for at have sagt, at der ikke blev fremsat noget tilbud om kursjusteringer.
I think the Chancellor is on record as saying that no offer of realignment was made.
GAREL JONES. — (EN) Nuvel, jeg er glad for, at det ærede medlem sagde, at det var et lille skridt.
GAREL JONES. — Well, I am glad that the honourable Member said that it was a small step.
Jeg tror, vi erkender, at det er et første skridt, en begyndelse, og det vil ikke overraske det ærede medlem at få at vide, at visse medlemsstater var meget ivrige efter en høj grad af åbenhed, medens andre var mere forsigtige, og nogle befandt sig i midten.
I think we recognize that this is a first step, a beginning, and it will not surprise the honourable Member to know that some Member States were very keen on a high degree of openness, some were more cautious and some were in the middle.
Den balance, vi har nået som et første skridt, går langt videre end til fjensynstransmissioner af orienterende debatter i Rådet: den vil også omfatte offentliggørelse af afstemningsresultater og en langt mere udstrakt brug af dokumentation, grønbøger osv. forud for beslutningerne.
The balance we have reached as a first step goes much further than the televising of orientation debates in the Council: it will also include the publication of voting records and a much wider use of documentation, green papers and so on, prior to decisions.
Så jeg erkender, at det kun er et første skridt, men det er et skridt i den rigtige retning, og det vil gøre Rådet mere tilgængeligt og forståeligt for borgerne.
So I accept that it is just a first step, but it is a step in the right direction, which will make the Council more accessible and comprehensible to the citizens.
WIJSENBEEK (LDR). — (EN) Rådet er omtrent den eneste lovgivende myndighed, der arbejder bag lukkede døre.
WIJSENBEEK (LDR). — The Council is virtually the only legislator working behind closed doors.
Er rådsformanden ikke enig i — både som demo krat og som medlem af parlamenternes moder — at alle rådsmøder bør være åbne, så medlemmerne af Parlamentet kan følge med?
Would the President-in-Office not agree — as both a democrat and a member of the Mother of Parliaments — that all Council sessions should be open to scrutiny by Members of this Parliament?
Rådet i Edinburgh har ikke gjort noget for at mindske det demokratiske underskud.
The Council in Edinburgh has done nothing to close the democratic deficit.
Agter Rådet at træffe — eller har det allerede truffet — foranstaltninger til ændring af mødeværelsernes form i Rådets nye bygning for at kunne afholde eventuelle offentlige møder, eftersom muligheden for at give offentligheden adgang til visse møder i øjeblikket overvejes i Rådet?
The need to make the deliberations of the Council public when it meets as legislator is at the centre of the debate on openness and the democratization of the Community.
GAREL JONES. — (EN) Nej, det er jeg ikke enig i.
GAREL JONES. — No, Sir, I would not agree with that.
Hvomår bør Rådet senest have truffet en afgørelse, hvis det skal undgås, at arbejdet på bygningen er nået så vidt, at der ikke er mulighed for at foretage ændringer?
Given that the Council is cunently looking into the possibility of opening certain meetings to the public, has the Council taken steps to alter the layout of the rooms in the new Council building to allow for possible public meetings, or does it intend to do so?
GAREL JONES, formand for Rådet. — (EN) Som led i iværksættelsen af Birmingham-aftalen om åbenhed har Rådet indgående overvejet muligheden af at åbne sine drøftelser mere for offentligheden.
ELLIOTT (S). — The President-in-Office said that some countries are more keen on openness, some are in the middle, and some are less keen. Would he care to indicate
Det Europæiske Råd i Edinburgh har igen bekræftet og videre udbygget denne forpligtelse.
Debates of the European Parliament
Vil han være venlig at oplyse, hvordan det britiske formandskabs holdning skal placeres i dette spektrum af synspunkter?
ELLIOTT what the position of the British presidency is in that spectrum of views?
Erkender han ikke, at det i betragtning af den måde, Rådet i øjeblikket arbejder og hidtil har arbejdet på, er yderst vanskeligt at få nogen form for åben, anstændig og offentlig debat og drøftelse?
Would he not recognize that it is extremely difficult, given the way the Council operates at the moment — and has done up to now — to have any kind of open, proper, public debate and discussion?
Når medlemmerne stiller spørgsmål her, får vi angående visse spørgsmål ofte at vide, at de ikke henhører under Parlamentets eller selv Fællesskabets kompetence.
When Members ask questions here we are very often told on certain issues that it is not within the competence of Parliament or even of the Community.
Hvis medlemmerne stiller spørgsmål i de nationale parlamenter, får de at vide, at de ikke kan få alle svarene, fordi det også berører 11 andre lande.
If Members ask questions in national parliaments, they are told they cannot be given all the answers because it concerns 11 other countries as well.
Hvordan skal offentligheden eller for den sags skyld dens valgte repræsentanter få at vide, hvad der foregår?
How are the public, and indeed elected representatives, to know what is happening?
Jeg erkender, at der er sket en bevægelse, men den må gå langt videre.
I accept that movement is being made, but we need much much more progress.
Må jeg foreslå, at ministeren læser en udmærket artikel i det sidste nummer af New
Could I suggest that the Minister read an excellent article in the cunent issue of New Statesman by the highly respected political journalist, John Cole, which sets out very clearly indeed the faults in the way the Community operates — and the Council in particular — in terms of openness.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
What I very much hope will happen is that this will be a start.
Statesman af den højt respekterede politiske journalist, John Cole, som særdeles klart opregner fejlene ved den måde, Fællesskabet — og i særdeleshed Rådet — fungerer på, når det gælder åbenhed.
Let me tell the honourable Member the sort of things we are thinking of: we are thinking first of all of having open orientation debates on presidency and Com mission work programmes in both the General Affairs Council and the Ecofin Council; the timing of those debates will be a decision for the presidency.
sagt, så er dette en beskeden begyndelse, men jeg vil afsløre en anden hemmelighed for Parlamentet.
Second, there should be regular open debates on major issues of Community interest.
Det kommende formandskab hørte også til de mere begejstrede med hensyn til åbenhed.
Again, it will be for the presidency, Member States or the Commission to propose an issue for open debate.
GAREL JONES. — (EN) Af hensyn til et mere åbent Fællesskabet vil jeg betro det ærede medlem en hemmelighed.
The incoming presidency was also on the more enthusiastic end of the spectrum where openness was concerned.
Den britiske regering var blandt de mere begejstrede i debatten for så vidt angår åbenhed.
So it is probably to be expected that the incoming presidency will seek to make as much use as it can of these decisions taken at the Edinburgh Council.
Spørgsmål nr. 6 af Newton Dunn
PRESIDENT. — Question No 6, by Mr Newton Dunn (H-1195/92)
Om: Definition af »repræsentanter« i Rådet
Subject: Definition of Council "representatives"
Med hensyn til det andet punkt, så må det britiske formandskab, som det ærede medlem gør så meget nar af, forsøge at finde kompromiser blandt medlemsstaterne, og der var som sagt en helt respektabel debat om dette, hvor der var forskellige opfattelser.
GAREL JONES. — In the interests of a more open Community, I will let the honourable Member into a secret. The British Government was at the more enthusiastic end of the debate so far as openness is concerned.
I Traktaterne hedder det: »Rådet består af repræsentanter for medlemsstaterne.
The treaties say that: "The Council shall consist of representatives of the Member States.
Hver regering udpeger et af sine medlemmer som delegeret.«
Each govern ment shall delegate to it one of its members."
Kan Rådet definere begrebet »repræsentanter« og i særdeleshed redegøre for, om repræsentanterne skal være valgte, og om de skal beklæde en ministerpost?
Will the Council please define "representatives", clarifying in particular whether these must have been elected, and whether they must hold ministerial office?
GAREL JONES, formand for Rådet. — (EN) I artikel 2 i Traktaten af 8. april 1965 om Oprettelse af et Fælles Råd og en Fælles Kommission for De Europæiske Fællesskaber hedder det:
GAREL JONES, President-in-Office of the Council. — Article 2 of the Treaty of 8 April 1965 establishing a single Council and a single Commission of the European Communities stipulates that:
»Rådet består af repræsentanter for medlemsstaterne.
"The Council shall consist of representatives of the Member States.
Hver regering udpeger et af sine medlemmer som delegeret«.
Each government shall delegate to it one of its members."
For at tage fat på det andet, det ærede medlem sagde, så er Det Europæiske Råd et enestående organ. Det er ikke bare en lovgivende forsamling.
Taking up the other point that the honourable Member made, the European Council is a unique body.
Jeg tror, at det, medlems staterne lægger vægt på, er, at en stor del af Rådets tid går med forhandlinger mellem medlemsstaterne om at finde frem til kompromiser.
I think what Member States are con cerned about is that a substantial amount of the Council's time is devoted to bargaining between Member States and finding compromises.
Somme tider har man en fornem melse af, at medlemsstaterne ikke ville være så villige til at bevæge sig i retning af fornuftige kompromiser, som gør det muligt at komme videre, hvis det skulle ske i offentlighed.
There is a feeling, sometimes, that Member States would not be so willing to move to the sort of reasonable compromises that make it possible for the Community to move forward if that was done in public.
Og de fleste medlemmer af Parlamentet, der tilhører politiske partier, fagforeninger eller hvad det nu kan være, vil vide, at det undertiden er bedst, at vanskelige afgørelser træffes i fortrolighed —jeg vil ikke bruge ordet 'hemmelighed'.
And most Members of this House who belong to political parties or trade unions or whatever will know that sometimes difficult decisions are better made in private — I would not use the word secret.
Der er frygt for, at Fællesskabets evne til at indgå hvad der undertiden er ganske vanskelige kompromiser som indebærer, at visse medlemsstater må bringe ofre for at støtte andre, vil blive mindre, hvis det skal ske i offentlighed.
There is a fear that the ability of the Community to make what are sometimes quite difficult compromises involving sacrifices by some Member States to assist others, might be more difficult to achieve if that had to be done in public.
Det fremgår af denne bestemmelse, at det tilkommer hver enkelt medlemsstats nationale regering at udpege et af sine medlemmer til at repræsentere den på Rådets samlinger og navnlig at deltage i eventuelle afstemninger.
It is clear from this provision that it is the responsibility of the national government of each Member State to appoint one of its members to represent it at each Council meeting, in particular to adopt a position in the event of a vote.
Hver medlemsstat fastsætter i henhold til sin nationale lovgivning, hvem der er medlem af regeringen, og hvem der ikke er det.
It is for each Member State to determine under its national law who is, and who is not, a member of the government.
Det ærede medlem ved uden tvivl, at i nogle medlemsstater består regeringen udelukkende af medlemmer af det nationale parlament, hvad enten de er valgte eller ej, mens dette ikke er tilfældet i andre medlemsstater.
The honourable Member will be aware that in some Member States governments consist exclusively of members of the national parliament, whether elected or otherwise, but that this rule does not apply in some other Member States.
Derfor kan et medlem af Rådet, som er forhindret i at deltage i en samling, i henhold til artikel 4 i Rådets forretningsorden alligevel lade sig repræsentere.
This being the case, a member of the Council who is prevented from attending a meeting may anange to be represented pursuant to Article 4 of the Council's Rules of Procedure.
Fuldmagt til at afgive stemme kan dog kun gives til et andet medlem af Rådet.
However, the right to vote may be delegated only to another member of the Council.
HABSBURG (PPE). — (EN) De har lige sagt, at det undertiden er nødvendigt at forhandle i fortrolighed — og der er jeg helt enig med Dem.
NEWTON DUNN (PPE). — I am very grateful for that reply; it is quite an interesting reply.
Vil De være venlig at fortælle mig, hvomår De forventer en forøgelse af gennemskuelighed i det, Rådet gør, når man lægger til grund, at nogle af forhandlingerne nødvendigvis må foregå i fortrolighed?
May I pay a tribute — since this is probably the last opportunity — and say that I have appreciated the President-in-Office's replies during the past six months. I shall miss him.
NEWTON DUNN (PPE). — (EN) Jeg er meget taknemmelig for dette svar; det er ganske interessant.
HABSBURG (PPE). — You have just stated that it is sometimes necessary to negotiate in secret — and I would fully agree with you.
Må jeg — siden det nok er min sidste mulighed — give udtryk for min anerkendelse og sige, at jeg har sat pris på rådsformandens svar i det sidste halve år. Jeg vil savne ham.
Would you be so kind as to tell me when you envisage increasing the transparency of what the Council is doing, it being understood that some bargaining has to be kept secret?
Vil De være så elskværdig at forklare mig, om embedsmænd betragtes som medlemmer, der er kvalificerede til at have sæde i Rådet og faktisk træffe beslutninger?
Would you please clarify for me whether civil servants are considered as members who would qualify to sit in the Council and actually take decisions?
GAREL JONES. — (EN) Jeg bruger ikke selv ordet 'hemmelighed', men hellere ordet 'fortrolighed', og der er stor forskel på disse ting.
GAREL JONES. — I do not use the word "secret" myself but rather the word "private" and there is a substantial distinction between the two.
Det sker naturligvis ofte, at folk tager hjem og ikke giver bureaukratiet, men briterne, skylden. Mit eget land har en særlig rolle at spille i disse sager.
Quite often, of course, people go home and do not blame the bureaucracy, they blame the British.
GAREL JONES. — (EN) Hvis han blandt embedsmænd medtager f. eks medlemmerne af COREPER, så er svaret naturligvis ja.
GAREL JONES. — If in the category of civil servants he includes members of COREPER, for example, then the answer, of course, is yes. Members of COREPER are
Medlemmerne af COREPER er embedsmænd i deres egne lande.
GAREL JONES public servants in their own countries.
Men de kan naturligvis ikke udgøre en del af quorum.
But, of course, they cannot make up part of the quorum.
FORMANDEN. — Da de følgende spørgsmål vedrører samme emne, vil vi under ét behandle spørgsmål nr. 7 af Sapena Graneli (H-1164/92):
Question No 7 by Mr Sapena Granell (H-l 164/92)
Om: Offentliggørelse af en liste over lufthavne med sikkerhedsmangler
Subject: Existence of a list of airports considered unsafe.
Hvad jeg meget håber vil ske, er, at dette vil være en begyndelse. Lad mig fortælle det ærede medlem, hvad vi tænker på: Vi tænker først og fremmest på at få åbne orienteringsmøder om formandskabets og Kommissionens arbejdsprogrammer, både i Rådet (generelle anliggender) og i ØKOFIN-Rådet; den tidsmæssige placering af disse forhandlinger vil det være op til formand skabet at afgøre.
The Council at its meeting on 7 December drew conclu sions covering, in particular, a proposal for a Council directive on the definition and use of a compatible technical and operating specification for the procurement of air traffic management equipment and systems, relations with Eurocontrol and the Commission's report on research programmes.
For nylig har pressen offentliggjort en »sortliste« (angiveligt udarbejdet af Den Internationale Føderation af Luftfartspiloters Foreninger) over 85 lufthavne, der betragtes som farlige eller mangelfulde, og
Various periodicals have recently published a black list (attributed to the International Federation of Airline Pilots' Associations) of 85 major airports which are considered dangerous or deficient in some way, a third of which are located within the Com munity.
Andre kilder hævder, at den fuldstændige liste på verdensplan omfatter 141 lufthavne.
Other sources maintain that the full list includes a total of 141 airports throughout the world.
Listen bygger på professionelle piloters vurdering af nogle afgørende forhold såsom udnyttelsen af luftrummet, blandet civil og militær luftfart under forskellige kontrol myndigheder og for korte start- og landingsbaner.
In drawing up the list, professional pilots used certain basic criteria such as saturation, joint civilian and military use under separate control and/or insufficient runway length.
Kan Rådet bekræfte, at denne liste foreligger, og at oplysningerne er korrekte?
Do the members of the Council not consider that it is time for air traffic control of all joint-use airports to be brought under a single civilian authority?
Er Rådets medlemmer ikke af den opfattelse, at tiden er inde til at samle flyvekontrollen under en civil myndighed i alle lufthavne med blandet lufttrafik?
SAPENA GRANELL (S). — (ES) Mr President-in-Office of the Council, you will know that saturation of air traffic control has increased, and in this sector a whole series of inegularities occurring at airports and above all in air traffic control are defined as technical accidents.
Hvorledes forholder Rådet sig til den beslutning, som Parlamentet vedtog den 18. september 1992 om det overfyldte luftrum og kontrollen med lufttrafikken, hvori der stilles forslag om oprettelse af en fællesskabsmyndighed med ansvar for bl.a. fælles sikkerhedsnormer for lufttransporten?
What does the Council think of the resolution adopted by Parliament on 18 September 1992 con cerning saturation and air traffic control, which proposes that a Community civil aviation authority should be set up with responsibility, inter alia, for common air transport safety standards?
og spørgsmål nr. 8 af Coimbra Martins (H-l 165/92):
Question No 8 by Mr Coimbra Martins (H-l 165/92) Subject: Blacklist of unsafe airports
GAREL JONES. — (EN) Jeg er det ærede medlem taknemmelig.
GAREL JONES. — I am grateful to the honourable Member.
Jeg tror faktisk ikke, han stillede et konkret spørgsmål, men han gav udtryk for en bekymring, som det er rigtigt af ham at lade komme til udtryk.
I do not think that he actually asked a specific question but he expressed a concern and an anxiety which he is right to express.
Jeg håber, at det Jeg sagde i mit oprindelige svar, antyder, at dette er noget, der tages meget alvorligt, og jeg håber også meget, at fremskridtene i retning af et fælles lufttrafikreguleringssystem i Europa vil ske så hurtigt som overhovedet muligt.
I hope that what I set out in my original answer does indicate that this is something that is being taken very seriously indeed and I very much hope that the progress towards a single air traffic flow system in Europe will be as rapid as it can possibly be made.
Han har helt ret.
He is quite right.
Der er for nylig offentliggjort en »sortliste« — tilsyneladende udarbejdet af Den Internationale Føderation af Luftfartspiloters Foreninger — over 85 hovedlufthavne med sikkerhedsmangler, hvoraf nogle ligger på Fællesskabets område.
A blacklist — apparently drawn up by the Interna tional Federation of Airline Pilots' Associations — has recently been published of 85 major airports which are considered dangerous, some of which are located within the Community.
Listen bygger på professionelle piloters vurdering af nogle grundlæg gende forhold såsom udnyttelsen af luftrummet, blandet civil og militær luftfart under forskellige kontrolmyndigheder, for korte start- og landingsbaner osv.
When drawing up the list, professional pilots used certain basic criteria such as saturation, joint civilian and military use under separate control, insufficient runway length, etc.
Har de ansvarlige ministre til hensigt at samordne kravene med henblik på at sikre grundlæggende sikkerheds- og kontrolbestemmelser for alle lufthavne i Fællesskabet, og dermed imødekomme for slagene i Sapena-betænkningen, som Europa-Parlamentet vedtog i september 1992?
Have the ministers responsible any plans to introduce uniform criteria so as to ensure basic control and safety standards at all Community airports, as pro posed in the Sapena report adopted by the European Parliament in September?
COIMBRA MARTINS (S). — (PT) Hr. formand, Deres svar tilfredsstiller ikke min berettigede nysgerrighed; det, jeg gerne ville vide i min egen og fælles interesse — på vegne afalle dem, der benytter fly — er, om der virkelig findes en pålidelig liste over lufthavne med sikkerheds mangler.
COIMBRA MARTINS (S). — (PT) Mr President, to be frank, the answer does not satisfy my legitimate curiosity, because what I needed to know, in my own interest and that of those who travel by air, is whether there really is a reliable list of unsafe airports.
Men — med forbehold af oversættelsesfejl — har De har ikke sagt i Deres svar, om en sådan liste findes eller ej.
If the translation was conect, he has not told me whether that list exists or not.
De sagde, at De ikke var i stand til at give et sikkert svar. Derfor er jeg stadig bekymret.
He said that he was not in a position to answer that with certainty, so that, to tell the truth, I am still a little worried.
Jeg er glad for at høre, at man langsomt, meget langsomt, er på vej hen imod en fælles kontrol i luftfartens Europa.
Of course I am glad that the President tells me that in one way and another progress is being made slowly, very slowly, towards a single air traffic control system in Europe.
Det var godt nyt, og jeg håber, at kendsgerningerne vil bekræfte det.
This is excellent news, and I only hope that that will prove to be the case.
Men, hr. formand, for at runde sagen af og for at tilfredsstille de mennesker, der har interesse i disse anliggender, kunne vi forestille os, at man tilskyndede til udarbejdelse af en undersøgelse af de eksisterende luft havne eller af lufthavnsprojekter, som kunne oplyse os om adgangen til sikre lufthavne, eller om vi løber en risiko på selve...
But, Mr President, perhaps we may then, to round things off and give greater satisfaction to those concerned, think of requesting or encouraging a study of existing airports or airport projects which really enable us to see whether we can rely on safe airports or whether we run the risk in...