natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg er derfor bange for, at Kommissionen i de kommende fire år blot fortsat vil stå magtesløs over for medlemsstaterne.
I am afraid therefore that in the next four years the Commission will continue to be stripped of its power in relation to the Member States.
Den kan derfor kun fortsætte med at kæmpe med ulige våben, nemlig ved hjælp af nævnte artikel 169, som omfatter tre faser — en skrivelse, en begrundet udtalelse og indbringelse for Domstolen — der hyppigt varer op til to eller tre år, hvorfor de er helt uforenelige med fristerne i forbindelse med indgåelse af offentlige kontrakter, som ikke bør overstige nogle måneder.
Consequently, it will have no choice but to continue fighting on unequal terms, in other words, by means of Article 169. Since this consists of three stages — a letter of notice, a reasoned opinion and a referral to the Court of Justice — the time-limits involved often reach two to three years and are therefore totally incompatible with those of a procedure for awarding public works contracts, which should not exceed a few months.
Endelig forekommer det mig i høj grad ønskeligt, at der hurtigst muligt kan vedtages et direktiv om de fra det foreliggende direktiv undtagne sektorer, nemlig vand, gas, elektricitet, transport og teletjenester.
Finally, I think that it would be highly desirable if a directive concerning the sectors which are excluded from the implementation of the present directive, in other words, the water, gas, electricity, transport and telecommunications sectors, could be adopted as quickly as possible.
Endelig er jeg overbevist om, at fællesskabsrettens almindelige regler om offentlige kontrakter også bør gælde for traditionelt militærud van der Waal (NI). — (NL) Hr. formand, Rådet er med hensyn til det foreslåede kontroldirektiv tydeligt afveget fra Kommissionens og Parlamentets forslag.
VAN DER WAAL (NI). — (NL) Mr President, the Council has distincly watered down its common position on the proposed compliance directive compared with the proposals of the Commission and of Parliament.
De vigtigste indvendinger fra Rådets side er rettet mod to elementer: For det første forslaget om at tillægge Kommissionen direkte interventionsmuligheder og for det andet imod, at det foreslås, at Kommissionen skal have beføjelse til at afbryde udbudsproceduren.
The Council's main reservations concern two points : firstly, the proposal to grant the Commission direct powers of intervention and, secondly, the proposal to allow the Commission to suspend the contract award procedure.
Ifølge Rådets opfattelse vil dette forslag tillægge Kommissionen supranationale beføjelser og er derfor i uoverensstemmelse med fælles skabsretten.
The Council feels that these proposals would give the Commission supranational authority and that they are therefore in conflict with the Community treaties.
Ydermere vil direktivets tilstræbte for mål blive bragt i fare herigennem.
In addition, they would jeopardize the objective of the directive.
Vi er enige i Rådets opfattelse.
We agree with the Council's view.
Det således formulerede forslag følger efter vor opfattelse den realitet, at de tolv medlemsstater i Fællesskabet selv er og fortsat må være ansvarlige for, at fællesskabsretten efterkommes, således også direktivet om en licitation af
We consider that the proposal in its present wording upholds the current situation in which each of the twelve Member States of the Community is responsible and must remain responsible for ensuring compliance with European law and therefore with the directive on public supply and public works contracts.
sikkerhed for, at arbejds- og beskæftigelsesvilkår overalt overholdes på samme måde.
VAN DER WAAL contracts that is subject to Community law cannot be organized at a purely national level.
Kommissionen skal som den offentlige interesses repræsentant i europæisk omfang have mulighed for at gøre sin retsopfattelse til anledning og genstand for kontrollen.
The Commission, as the representatives of European public interest, must be able to apply their view of what is right to the supervisory procedures.
Vi er klar over, at på denne måde bliver den bydendes sikkerhed for, at klagen bliver behandlet hurtigt og målrettet, og at han fortsat kan deltage i udbudsproceduren, afhængig af den hast medlems staterne lægger for dagen.
We are aware that under this system the contractor's assurance that his case will be dealt with promptly and efficiently, and that he will still be able to take part in the award procedure, depends on how soon the Member State takes action.
Men medlemsstaterne er forpligtet til om nødvendigt at bringe en hasteprocedure i anvendelse.
But the Member States are required to use an accelerated procedure if necessary.
Hvis de ikke vil være med til dette, er det et brud på fællesskabsretten.
Failure to cooperate constitutes a violation of Community law.
Kommis sionen er så i medfør af artikel 169 beføjet til at indbringe sagen for Domstolen.
The Commission then has the right to appeal to the Court of Justice under Article 169 of the Treaty.
Det er så af stor betydning, at Kommissionen i påkommende tilfælde rent faktisk gør brug af denne beføjelse.
It is therefore very important that the Commission should actually exercise this right in future cases.
Inden for medlemsstaterne må man nå frem til ensartede situationer.
The situation must be the same in each Member State.
Jeg tillægger en fremtidig undersøgelse af, hvorvidt der rent faktisk skabes en sådan situation, stor betydning.
I think it is also very important to consider at some point in the future whether such a situation has actually been achieved.
Det er min konklusion, at på basis af den fælles holdning kommer der således klagemuligheder, hvor disse indtil nu ikke eksisterede.
I would conclude that the common position introduces options that were not available previously.
Dette er et vigtigt skridt frem. Derfor kan vi tilslutte os Rådets hold ning.
This is a major step forward and we can therefore approve the Council's position.
Rådet gør sig skyldig i en farlig fejltagelse, hvis det opretholder ønsket om enstemmighed.
The Council will be making a serious mistake if it persists in upholding its unanimous decision against this.
Rådets løsninger opfylder kun betingelsen i utilstrækkeligt omfang.
The procedure proposed by the Council is inadequate.
De sikrer ikke Kommissionens indflydelse, og sikrer derfor i tilfælde af konflikt ikke, at en europæisk ordning også bliver en effektiv sådan.
It does not safeguard the influence of the Commission and, where there is conflict, it will not ensure that the European ruling is effective.
I denne forbindelse er jeg især interesseret i de små og mellemstore byggevirksomheder.
I am particularly concerned about the small and medium sized building firms.
De har ingen lobby, som kan gøre sig gældende hos Kommis sionen, men de bygger i den kvalitet, som bygherrerne ønsker, og de er også de mest beskæftigelsesintensive.
They have no lobby at the EC Commission, but the quality of their work is what customers want and they provide the most jobs.
Nu kan jeg ganske enkelt ikke forestille mig, at de skal gribe ind over for illoyal konkurrence fra større byggevirksomheders side, når de som under entreprenører, via kapitalstrukturer eller bankers indflydelse — hvordan det end måtte være — er afhængige af disse.
I simply cannot imagine that they will take action against unfair competition from major construction companies when they are dependent on these major companies as subcontractors, either because of their capital structure or because of bank pressures.
Især om dette punkt vil jeg gerne høre Kommissionens opfattelse forud for afstemningen. gen.
I would particularly like to hear the Commission's comments on this point before we vote.
Hertil komme byggematerialerne og den endnu ikke gennemførte andenbehandling af de sektorer, der holdes udenfor, altså en hel del indre marked.
Public supply contracts are also covered as well as the difficult outstanding second reading on the sectors which have been excluded, all major facets of the internal market.
Det har ikke gjort sagen lettere, at der i et sådant projekt er sammenhæng mellem alle aspekterne.
The matter is not made any easier by the fact that all the various aspects must be coordinated.
Carvalhas (CG). — (PT) Hr. formand, vi mener, at Rådets fælles holdning trods alt er et tilfredsstillende kompromis.
CARVALHAS (CG). — (PT) Mr President, in our opinion, in spite of everything, the common position of the Council is a satisfactory compromise.
Hr. Beumers betænkning gør opmærksom på visse divergenser mellem den fælles holdning og Parlamentets intervention.
Mr Beumer's report draws our attention to the differences between Parliament's intervention and the common position.
Vigtige anliggender vedrørende opbygningen af det indre marked kom mer nu til andenbehandling.
We are in the process of hearing a second reading on important matters concerning the construction of the Single Market.
Man giver således de nationale myndigheder og retsinstanserne større garantier på bekostning af Kommissionens magt; det samme gælder appelmulighederne og muligheden for at afbryde en udbudsprocedure.
Thus, greater guarantees are being given to the national authorities and judicial bodies at the expense of the Commission; the same thing is happening in relation to the appeal courts and to the possibility of suspending a procedure.
Som det netop er blevet sagt, har denne sag også reference til arbejdstagerne, deres løn, rettigheder og garantier, og vi er imod social dumping.
As the previous speaker said, this matter also concerns the workers, their salaries, their rights and guarantees and we are opposed to social 'dumping'.
Vi skal også være opmærksomme på de små og mellemstore virksom heder, og jeg vil gerne høre Kommissionen herom.
We also have to take into account the small and medium-sized undertaking and we would like to hear the Commission speak on this subject.
Den fælles holdning, der står til debat, fortjener særlig opmærksomhed fra Parlamentets side, fordi al europæisering kun sker på papiret, sålænge der ikke er tilsyn med den korrekte ordreafgivelse.
The common position we are discussing here requires Parliament's careful attention. Unless the awarding of public supply and public works contracts is supervised properly, Europeanization will exist only on paper.
I denne forbindelse drejer det sig ikke kun om, at ordrerne skal afgives over hele Europa, eller om hvorvidt interesserede virksomheder får lige muligheder.
There is more at issue than ensuring the contracts are awarded on a European basis, that all companies with a right to tender are given equal opportunities.
Det var Parlamentet, der fastslog, at det er arbejdstager nes rettigheder på stedet for ordrens udførelse, der skal være gældende.
It was Parliament that pointed out that the workers' rights obtaining in the place where the contract is concluded must apply.
Ved tilsynet med den korrekte afgivelse af ordrerne drejer det sig om, at der over hele Europa skabes
Nevertheless, we recognize that the amendments introduced by the rapporteur Mr Beumer are a move towards greater simplification and transparency.
Da forslaget betragtes som tilfredsstillende af de interesserede organisationer og virksomheder, mener vi ikke, det er nødvendigt at ændre på det, hvilket kunne få en ugunstig virkning.
The supervision of the application of correct procedures when awarding contracts also involves ensuring that working conditions are adhered to equally all over Europe.
I det foreliggende tilfælde drejer det sig undtagelses vis ikke om, at der skal differentieres efter mindre eller større virksomheder eller indføres regler til beskyttelse af arbejdstageres eller svagere medlems staters interesser.
ally intended assuming wideranging responsibility and powers for itself which would have brought about sweeping changes in the legal systems of several Member States.
Her drejer det sig ganske enkelt om, at den, der gøres uret, skal have mulighed for at få sin ret, og det skal gælde for alle i samme omfang.
For example, it intended assuming the right to suspend, i.e., to break off tendering procedures.
Her drejer det sig ene og alene om rettens gennemførelse og ikke, det vil jeg gerne påpege endnu en gang, om Kommissionens afgørelse af retten.
The fundamental question is whether we should create European law, or at any rate give the Commission farreaching powers to intervene or should we merely lay down certain general principles which must then be anchored in national legislation ?
Christiansen (S). — Hr. formand, vi er enige i, at det er vigtigt, at der sættes effektivt ind over for de mange overtrædelser i forbindelse med de fælles EF-regler vedrørende indkøbs-, bygge- og anlægskontrakter.
The Danish Social Democrats can support these amendments to the common position particularly, because as we see it, it is right to stress national responsibility for compliance with the directives and, at the same time to strengthen the competence of the Member States.
Kommissionen havde jo imidlertid oprindelig tiltænkt sig selv større kompetence og magt, der også ville have medført vidtrækkende ændringer i en række medlemsstaters retssystemer; den havde bl.a. tiltænkt sig selv en suspensionsbeføjelse, dvs. ret til at afbryde udbudsproceduren.
This we feel will ensure that the appeal and control system functions effectively in all Member States which is also important where compliance with the provisions protecting social and labour laws contained in the directive is concerned, although we could have wished it to have been more wideranging than it actually is.
Selvfølgelig bevarer Kommissionen alle de muligheder, den har nu i henhold til Traktaten.
The Commission believes in subsidiarity, i.e. in only regulating what must be regulated at a European level.
Afgørelserne kan appelleres til domstolene, herunder EF-Domstolen.
The directive makes provision for all this and I feel that we can be satisfied with it.
Her stod vi imidlertid over for et principielt spørgsmål : Har vi brug for europæisk ret dertil eller i hvert fald omfattende ret for Kommissionen til at gribe ind, eller skal vi bare fastsætte nogle generelle principper, som skal gå igen i national ret?
The first question is whether the directive, whether European legislation should affect these national provisions, as provided for in amendments nos 1, 2 and 4, which call for the Member States to ensure that the appropriate authorities use certain procedures (amendment No 1), or (amendment No 4) are required to check whether the awarding of the contract can be suspended as long as it has not passed the tendering state.
Disse ændringer i den fælles holdning kan vi danske socialdemokrater tiltræde, først og fremmest fordi det principielt efter vor opfattelse er rigtigt at under strege det nationale ansvar ved direktivernes over holdelse og i den sammenhæng styrke den nationale kompetence.
BANGEMANN, Vicepresident of the Commission. — (DE) Mr President, this directive is the second step towards achieving a European market where the award of public supply and public works contracts is concerned.
Hermed sikres efter vor opfattelse, at klage- og kontrolsystemet kommer til at fungere effektivt i alle medlemsstater, og det er vigtigt også i forhold til overholdelse af de sociale og arbejdsretlige beskyttelsesbestemmelser, der findes i direktiverne, selv om vi nok kunne have ønsket os dem mere vidtrækkende, end tilfældet er.
Apart from the existing provisions on the manner in which such contracts are put out to tender, who is eligible to tender, that there is to be no discrimination, that account must also be taken of social aspects and that small and medium-sized undertakings must be considered, there is another aspect, i.e. how are we to protect those persons who suffer because national authorities do not comply with these provisions, despite all the European regulations that have already been created or which may yet be created.
Kommissionen går ind for subsidiaritetsprincippet, hvilket vil sige, at vi kun fastsætter regler for det, der ubetinget bør afgøres på europæisk plan.
It would be possible to do all this, but it would have to be considered to what extend we would then be usurping the rights of adjudication.
Det vi ikke giver regler for, kan forblive under den nationale lovgiver og den nationale domsmagts kompetence.
For example, if the awarding of a contract is interrupted, suspended or altered in any way, certain partial contracts could already have been awarded.
Det vil være en alvorlig fejltagelse, hvis Kommis sionen maser sig på for så at sige som overdommer at ville udtale sig om alt, der sker i Fællesskabet.
For once, in this particular case, we are not concerned with differentiating between large and small companies, or protecting the interests of workers or weaker Member States.
Selv ganske almindelige voldgiftsdommeres liv er jo ikke den rene lyksalighed.
We are simply concerned with ensuring that wherever wrong has been done, the person concerned can obtain justice and this must apply equally across the board.
De ved alle, hvor svært disses mennesker har det.
What happens to the companies who have already been awarded these contracts ?
Kommissionen burde ved lejlighed overveje at lave et direktiv om beskyttelse af voldgiftsdommere. Vi vil i hvert fald ikke være overdommere.
Must it not be left up to the authority in question to decide whether, by suspending the whole procedure because one individual is ag grieved, much greater harm could arise ?
Vi ønsker, at de nationale myndigheder udøver deres rettigheder, og dertil har de natur ligvis først og fremmest brug for et retsgrundlag.
You will appreciate that we cannot deal with small and medium-sized undertakings and social regulations in every single directive.
Tilbage står spørgsmålet, om vi endnu en gang skal gøre et forsøg på at ændre det? Jeg tror, at man bør skelne mellem to ting.
It goes without saying that the Commission will make use of all the rights accorded it in the Treaties.
Det ene spørgsmål er, om vi allerede nu ved hjælp af direktivet, altså ved euro-
I found Mr Christiansen's remarks interesting as there was a
Bangemann, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (DE) Hr. formand, med dette direktiv tager vi nu det andet skridt for at oprette et europæisk marked for offentlig bygge- og anlægsvirksomhed.
The Storebelt case shows, for example, the two approaches taken by the Court of Justice, which we should also respect.
Ved siden af de allerede eksisterende regler for udlicitering af sådanne ordrer, for hvem der har lov til at deltage deri, og om at der ikke må diskrimineres, at der indgår sociale bestemmelser deri, og at der skal tages hensyn til små og mellemstore virksomheder, er der også et andet synspunkt, der bør spille en rolle, nemlig spørgsmålet: Hvordan kan man beskytte dem, der til trods for alle de europæiske regler og bestemmelser, vi allerede har gennemført eller måske vil lave i fremtiden, lider skade ved, at nationale myndigheder ikke holder sig til disse regler.
In one case the Court of Justice ruled that the procedure was to be suspended and the contract was to put out to tender again, as the damage caused by the infringement was greater than the damage caused by the suspension. In a second case exactly the
Men om fire år kan situationen være en ganske anden. I mellemtiden får vi en række eksempler.
BANGEMANN first position was that we must be able to take action.
pæisk ret, skal gribe ind i de nationale bestemmelser, som det fremgår af ændringsforslag nr. 1, 2 og 4?
Even Parliament felt that this went too far during the first reading.
Rådet accepterede det slet ikke, hvorefter vi ret og slet trak os ud af det.
The Council was not prepared to accept this, so that we withdrew completely.
Hvad sker der med de virksomheder, der allerede har disse ordrer?
opposite ruling was made.
Bør myndigheden ikke overveje, om den, hvis den på grund af krænkelse af en enkelts rettigheder afbryder hele proceduren, ikke anretter endnu større skade?
It was ruled that the procedure had been infringed and that a third party had a right to compensation, but the damage that would be caused if the procedure were to be suspended would be much greater than the damage caused to the aggrieved party.
For så vidt er artikel 2 a ny.
Article 2a is new.
Medlemsstaterne skal sikre sig, at den kompetente administrative myndighed eller domstolene i henhold til den i artikel 1 nævnte procedure indrømmes ret til at søge oplysning om Kommissionens konstateringer med hensyn til Fællesskabets interesser.
The Member States are to guarantee that the administrative body or tribunal responsible has the right, in the procedure referred to in Article 1, to be informed of observations made by the Commission in connection with matters of Community interest.
Jeg synes, at det er et glimrende kompromis, og jeg nærer et vist håb om, at Rådet kan acceptere det.
I feel that this is an excellent compromise and I feel reasonably confident that the Council will be able to accept it.
Derfor er vi villige til at overtage dette ændringsforslag.
We are very willing to accept this amendment.
For øvrigt vil vi igen om fire år undersøge, hvor langt vi er kommet.
In four years time we will review our progress.
Alligevel er det allerede et ganske væsentligt fremskridt, som vi har opnået, og for så vidt kan vi takke hinanden gensidigt.
We have already made considerable advances and this is a matter for mutual congratulation.
Jeg takker i hvert fald Parlamentet, udvalget og ordføreren for den hidtil opnåede succes. Jeg er sikker på, at Parlamentet også vil takke mig, når direktivet foreligger.
At any rate, I congratulate Parliament, the committee and the rapporteur on the success achieved so far.
Formanden. — Tak, hr. kommissær, måske ses vi igen om en fire års tid.
PRESIDENT. — Thank you, Commissioner, perhaps we shall see each other in 4 years' time.
Det berører kun spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt udskrivningsproceduren skal ophæves og allerede afgivne ordrer annulleres. Det er meget vanskeligt, og reglerne er forskellige i samtlige medlemsstater.
I can assure you that, as Mr Beumer requests — whom I would, by the way, very much like to thank for his report — we will, at the end of four years, check the cases that arise and report on the question of whether the regulations in Member States are adequate or whether we need provisions as provided for in amendments Nos 1, 2 and 4.
Jeg kan love Dem det, som hr. Beumer, som jeg takker for betænkningen, har krævet, nemlig at vi efter fire års forløb gennemgår alle sager og underretter Dem om, hvorvidt medlemsstaternes regler er tilstrækkelige, eller om vi bør indføre bestemmelser som nævnt i ændringsforslag nr. 1,2 og 4.
At the moment, however, we see no prospect of success — this may not always be a valid reason — but also no objective reasons which could persuade us to accept this wording.
I øjeblikket mener vi
The position may be different in four years time.
') Dagsorden for næste mode: se protokollen.
By that time we shall a whole range of concrete cases.
Ændring af Traktaterne, EF-lovgivning og institutionelle reformer — Mundtlige forespørgsler (dok.
Contents questions (Doc.
B3-424/89) og (dok.
B3-424/89) and (Doc.
B3-425/89) af Det Institutionelle Udvalg
B3425/89), by the Committee on Institutional
Pannella, Telkämper, Giscard d'Estaing, Pannella, Telkämper
Mr Pannella, Mr Telkämper, Mr Giscard d'Estaing, Mr Pannella, Mr Telkämper . .
Fællesskabspagt om de grundlæggende arbejdsmarkedsmæssige og sociale rettigheder — Økonomisk og social samhørighed — Betænkning (dok.
Community Charter of Fundamental Social Rights — Economic and social cohesion — Report (Doc.
A3-69J89) af Buron, mundlige forespørgsler (dok.
A3-69/89), by Mrs Buron, oral questions (Doc.
A3-26/89) af de la Malene, (dok. B3-32/89) af Cot, Santos og Colajanni, (dok.
B3-26/89) by Mr de la Malène, (Doc.
B3-421/89) af Klepsch og Chanterie, (dok. B3-422/89) af Giscard d'Estaing, (dok. B3-423/89) af Prout, (dok. B3-426/89) af Vandemeulebroucke, (dok.
B3-421/89), by Mr Klepsch and Mr Chanterie, (Doc.
B3-437/89) af Barros Moura og Elmalan
B3-437/89), by Mr Barros Moura and Mr Elmalan