natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Princippet om én person, én stemme, uanset omfanget af den enkeltes aktiepost, indebærer, at det er mennesker snarere end kapital, der bestemmer. Fru Vayssade sætter fokus på den umådelige størrelse af nogle kooperativer inden for Fællesskabet.
I should like to thank Mr Rothley, Ms Oddy and Mrs Vayssade very sincerely and everyone who has taken part in this debate, because we have witnessed considerable support for our efforts and also major improvements in matters of detail.
Som eneste alternativ er der kun artikel 235 i EØF-Traktaten tilbage, som også den første hidtil eksisterende europæiske selskabsform bygger på.
MERZ (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the European company will be able to make its contribution to the integration of the economic activities of undertakings in the single European market only if it is attractive to undertakings.
Mine indvendinger i Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Borgernes Rettigheder døde hen uden plausibel modargumentation.
It is entirely up to a founder undertaking to decide whether to take advantage of the legal form of the European company.
Derfor anmodede jeg skriftligt hr. von Stauffenberg, som er formand, om at få vor juridiske tjenestegren eller vor jurisconsulte, hr. Jorge Campinos, til at fremsætte en udtalelse. Jeg har imidlertid ikke hørt mere i sagen.
The European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights therefore makes various proposals to increase the attractiveness of the European company.
Fremtidig lovgivning må skelne mel lem de nye store transnationale kooperativer og de stadig meget betydningsfulde små kooperativer.
I would remind you that we have reached this stage because we have avoided the mistakes made in the first statute for a European company.
For det første er de store kooperativer i mange tilfælde ved at stifte private aktieselskaber som filialer.
We should therefore make a correct assessment of this success and what made it possible.
Disse private aktieselskaber bliver noteret på børsen.
We should not change this, otherwise we will have political or technical problems.
Det er på dette punkt, lovgivningen må udformes på en sådan måde, at den beskytter andelshaveren.
Allow me to summarize briefly once again what made this success possible.
Når kontrollen flytter sig, så gør kapitalen og ressourcerne det samme.
This is very important, and no one so far has suggested this should be changed.
For det andet har vi og vil fortsat havde de små producentandelsforeninger.
But we have forged links of this kind for two reasons.
Den er ganske vist obligatorisk, men der er fire forskellige former at vælge imellem.
It is not right to restrict it to companies governed by national law.
Valget mellem et monistisk, dvs. af repræsentantskabet bestemt, og
In my personal opinion it would also have been right to allow natural and not only legal persons to found European companies, but this can be the next step.
Grund et dualistisk, dvs. af direktion og repræsentantskab bestemt system skal imidlertid i den forbindelse ikke kunne udelukkes.
option if it can be incorporated in familiar mechanisms of national law.
Det anser jeg for en krænkelse af traktatprincipperne, da der så ikke mere er sikkerhed for konkurrenceneutralitet.
Surprisingly, the opposition has concerned not so much the references to national law, not so much the fundamental political options, as highly technical aspects.
Chanterie (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, historien om Det Europæiske Selskab er en lang historie, der er næsten 20 år gammel.
Obviously, the experts feel more at home when they can apply their own law and less so when they have to apply a new set of rules, even if they are better.
Jeg har været med til at opleve de sidste ti år af denne historie her i Parlamentet. Det er ligeledes en trist historie, historien om stagnation, historien om forpassede chancer.
I would therefore say this to Mr Janssen van Raay, who mentioned this, I believe: at lunch with the Council there is always general willingness to cut back these references to national law, because it is, of course, realized that there will otherwise be a jumble of different SEs.
Vi har stadig ingen statut for Det Euro pæiske Selskab, og der findes ingen europæisk løsning på arbejdstagernes medbestemmelse.
Then, when you sit down with experts, you find the opposite view being expressed : every expert believes that only what he has got through his national parliament in perhaps twenty years is the ideal solution.
Heraf kan man se, hvad enstemmighed i Ministerrådet kan føre til, især til en blokering.
You can even go so far as to say that company law experts are worse than any other kind of expert.
Kommissionens forslag må gøre det muligt at gennembryde denne blokering.
So we should remember that before we go on.
PPE-Gruppen sætter vedtagelsen af en statut for Det Europæiske Selskab højt på prioritetslisten.
Where tax questions are concerned, wc have been in two minds, because, on the one hand, we would, of course, like to make a new legal form such as this attractive so that it will be taken up.
Dermed skal også de resterende hindringer ryddes af vejen for den stordrift, der nu er under gennemførelse inden for rammerne af det indre marked.
If they were tailored specifically to the purpose of the company, they would give it a privileged status to which all the others ought really to be entitled.
Sagt på en anden måde, forskellene mellem økonomisk realitet og juridisk ramme må fjernes.
That would be discrimination against the other forms of company, which is something that needs to be considered in this context.
Endelig har jeg alvorlige betænkeligheder ved for slagets artikel 61, i henhold til hvilken der ved oprettelsen af selskabet er frit valg mellem den monistiske og den dualistiske form og medlemsstaterne ikke kan indskrænke denne valgfrihed.
Thirdly, where worker participation is concerned, we have now reached the stage where we have responded to this politically and technically very difficult issue with an offer and a degree of flexibility to which most Member States evidently no longer have any major objections.
Derfor støtter vi forslagene i Vayssadebetænkningen og beder Kommissionen om hurtigt at forelægge tilpas sede forslag.
I and my staff are, of course, at your disposal at all times to discuss amendments in detail.
PPE-Gruppen lægger den største vægt på et afbalanceret forslag, det vil sige, at i al fald skal forordningen og direktivet kobles sammen, det direktiv der skal bestemme arbejdstagernes plads i Det Europæiske Selskab. Dette er en meget vigtig sag.
But I would like to mention one example: if we reduce or completely withdraw the opportunity the Member States have been granted to exclude some of the worker participation models, if, in other words, we force Member States to permit all the models we are offering, the proposal will fail.
Ikke alene skal arbejdstagerne inddrages i stiftelsen af Det Europæiske Selskab, men også i den videre udvikling af samme.
I say this so unequivocally so that no one is in the dark about the implications of certain decisions.
I forbindelse med tilsyn foreslår vi, at listen over de skridt, der skal forelægges arbejdstagerne til godkendelse udvides og formuledes bedre.
We have therefore opted for what I feel is the still acceptable course of saying in Article 133 that it must be possible to offset the losses of subsidiaries and branches of a European company, because this emphasizes the European nature of this legal form.
Rettighederne vedrørende fuldstændig og hurtig information, høring og medbestemmelse må formuleres bedre.
If I have a company that extends beyond the frontiers, it is in fact logical that what happens in another country should be set off against my own success or failure.
Det er vigtigt, at man ikke alene anerkender arbejdstagernes ret til at blive informeret men ligeledes virksomhedsledelsens informationspligt.
We have proposed a similar arrangement for all other undertakings in the general directive on the harmonization of the taxation of undertakings.
Vi vil også understrege, at man ikke kan nøjes med at formulere rettigheder og pligter, men at man også må give regler om, at disse kan gennemtvinges retligt, samt at de kan sanktioneres.
So this inconsistency will disappear very quickly. If it exists at all, it could do so for only a certain period, but if, for example, we are pressed for time as a result of the adoption of the statute as far as the general arrangement is concerned, it will again be an advantage for everyone.
Hidtil har udviklingen af EF's indre marked været virksomhedernes paradis.
Everything that really exists, even socialism, if it ever really existed, was or is a travesty of the ideal.
Men noget, jeg savner i direktivet, er meget bedre tryghedsbestemmelser for de ansatte, især i Danmark.
I therefore ask that we be left with this opportunity to react as flexibly as possible to the various political situations.
Derfor er det vigtigt, at medbestemmelsen ikke blot er fine ord, men noget der vil virke og respekteres.
In the early stages the Commission had a number of problems with the cooperatives themselves, since they were not all convinced that a European form of this kind was necessary.
De aftalesystemer, som findes mellem arbejdsgivere og lønmodtagere, skal tilpasses uden forringelser.
In the meantime they have abandoned their opposition, and, as Parliament suggested, we resumed our work some months ago.
Jeg tænker her på det arbejdsretslige system, medarbejdernes repræsentation i virksomhedernes bestyrelse.
What I can be definite about, because this has been raised several times, is this: there will be no European company without worker participation.
Hvis det sker, så er vi på rette vej med dette direktiv.
I have said this from the outset.
For tyve år siden, hr. formand, forestillede man sig, at der i EF kun kunne indføres een model.
If you decide that we have to submit this by 30 June, the Commission will comply.
Chanterie har vi været så tæt på en deblokering af situationen.
BANGEMANN have this legal form on 1 January 1993 if Parliament, which is, of course, very interested in this, presses ahead quickly with us.
Vor gruppe håber på, at Kommissionens forslag, forbedret gennem de her drøftede betænkninger, kan regne med bred støtte ikke blot i Retsudvalget, men ligeledes her i plenarforsamlingen.
hard ECU either. So you should please explain that to the other members of your group and other interested parties in Britain.
Vi må ikke falde tilbage i de gamle modsætninger, som i de forgangne 15 år har ført til golde debatter.
We at least believe that we have found a satisfactory and practicable method.
at skelne mellem disse tre elementer af samfunds økonomien, som hver især befinder sig på forskellige udviklingstrin, både økonomisk og i forhold til europæisk tilknytning.
First, the question of access to the SE : we agree with the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights that the act of founding, with which access per se is gained, should be defined as flexibly and broadly as possible.
Da forskellene er så store, berettiger de til at give Det Europæiske Kooperative Selskab en selvstændig statut.
However, two things must be seen as limiting factors in this context.
Salema (LDR). — (PT) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, jeg vil starte med at beklage, at der er stillet et så stort antal ændringsforslag til dette emne — over to hundreder, har jeg hørt — at det gør en debat af dem alle i plenarforsamlingen komplet umulig og kan under afstemningen bringe de foreslåede mål sætninger i fare; i det mindste kan det gå ud over det minimum af teknisk kohærens, som jeg mener, Europa-Parlamentets udtalelser bør have.
Firstly, it cannot be our intention to do away with the requirements to be satisfied when a company changes its legal form by making the sphere of application of the SE very wide. If, for example, partnerships — or let us take the extreme case of several individuals — want to found a European company, they will have to go through the proper procedures and not avoid the transformation they have to complete before they can choose the legal form of a European company.
Tilbage er der kun at tage stilling til to- tre hovedpunkter.
But I believe our ideas are fully comensurate with what is done in Britain.
På den anden side mener vi, at en forenkling af denne statut er nødvendig, så den også kan omfatte de små og mellemstore virksomheder.
As this proposal would also cover the SE, it would solve this problem.
Som hr. Wijsenbeek allerede har sagt, går vi også ind for princippet om en neutral beskatning, og derfor vil vi stemme for, at man undlader den skattemæssige bestemmelse, der er indeholdt i artikel 13, som også Retsudvalget foreslår.
This again is the right way to go about things, because here we have a practical proposal that also complies with the constitutional situation in some Member States.
På dette punkt og i tilfælde af uenighed om den type medbestemmelse, der skal være gældende, går vi ind for — modsat den af Retsudvalgets valgte adgang til voldgift — at arbejdstagernes repræsentanter skal have ret til at vælge den model, der skal gælde for Det Europæiske Selskab.
As you see, the debate has taken a very good turn, I can say, to the extent that this can be said at this stage, because the debate has only just begun, that the opposition in the Council too is in essence not so much political as technical.
Således forhindrer vi, at man indfører en model mod deres vilje, en model, der er ukendt for dem og som der ikke er tradition for.
But where there is a will, it should always be possible to overcome technical opposition.
Før da var det den almindelige opfattelse, at det ville blive almindeligt med et tostrenget ledelsessystem, der kombinerede direktion på ét niveau og tilsyn på et andet, men under disse forhandlinger blev det klart, at dette ikke ville ske.
The company would then be constituted in the form of a European company, but operate in only one Member State.
Man forstod, at der var behov for ligeværdige muligheder, og det var det, vi faktisk fastslog på det tidspunkt.
That should perhaps be ruled out, because the European character of the SE would certainly no longer be guaranteed.
Vi anvendte dem alle på en ensartet måde i overensstemmelse med Rom-Traktaten.
The only limits are these two principles and, of course, technical manageability.
Man har det hollandske system, det italienske system, og et enkeltstrenget ledelsessystem, der kombinerer direktion og tilsyn.
The relationship between the regulation and national law has been mentioned for good reason. In this respect — and I say this quite openly — our proposal is capable of improvement.
I en sådan ledelse kan man ikke have ansatte, der er direktører, for så ville de både være direktører og medarbejdere, og det er to uforenelige roller.
I said as much in the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights and probably in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy.
Derfor er der blevet fremsat forslag om at opdele den enstrengede ledelses funktioner, og om at kombinere disse funktioner med et bedriftsråd.
We have had confirmation today that the Commission's good will is reflected in its proposal.
Bedriftsrådet vælges af alle ansatte, ved hemmelig afstemning og efter forhold stal.
We see from the amendments that Parliament is participating in this procedure with just as much good will.
Således, med disse ligeværdige valgmuligheder, nærer jeg ingen tvivl om, at den nye selskabsretlige lovgivning vil vise sig meget nyttig for industri og handel i hele Fællesskabet.
If we intend to create the single market, we need common legal instruments, and if we could create the European company, it would be a breakthrough whose importance cannot be overrated.
Med hensyn til Det Europæiske Kooperative Selskab accepterer vi generelt det foreliggende forslag til beslutning, da det forfægter de samme hold ninger, som de kooperative bevægelsers repræsentative organer har.
Where the worker participation models and the other questions to do with employees are concerned, one thing, of course, is particularly important: if we offer these three or perhaps more models, depending on the variation, they must all be of the same value.
Det fremgår dog ikke klart af betænkningen, om der kun skal være én forordning for hele samfundsøkonomien, eller tre selvstændige: en for kooperativer selskaber, en for gensidige selskaber og en for sammenslutninger.
I want to make that particularly clear to our British friend Lord Inglewood. To stick to the example he gave, the hard ECU is guaranteed only if the British model as it is applied in practice is of equal value to the other models.
Vi støtter derfor hr. Chanteries ændringsforslag nr. 1, hvis formål er
If this equal value is not ensured, you will not have a
Alavanos (CG). — (GR) Hr. formand, ingen kan have nogen indvendinger mod udviklingen af Det Europæiske Selskab som institution og en statut herfor som en faktor, der vil bidrage til et produktivt, multinationalt samarbejde inden for Fællesskabet.
WIJSENBEEK (LDR). — (NL) Mr President, may I ask the Commissioner a very specific question to which he has not given an answer ?
Jeg mener dog, at debatten, som jeg ikke har fulgt i de pågældende udvalg, men kun her, helt
I asked him whether he was now willing to promise that the Commission would also
Alavanos glæder mig, at ordførerne på dette område, også selv om det sommetider er i en anden form, har overtaget Socialudvalgets ændringsforslag.
The first issue of substance relates to the need to differentiate clearly between programmes which arc essentially research programmes and those which might be described as demonstration projects or studies.
Ud fra denne betragtning ser vi, at der i realiteten er to hastigheder i Fællesskabet.
the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(90) 164 final — Doc.
En hastighed for den økonomiske sektor og en anden, meget langsommere, for arbejdstagernes sociale ret tigheder.
C3-167/90 — SYN 269) for a decision adopting a specific research and technological development programme in the field of nonnuclear energies (1990 — 1994)
Arbejdstagerrepræsentanter skal have en retlig beskyttelse.
The second point relates to biomass.
Her genfinder jeg ideerne fra mine ændringsforslag fra Socialudvalget.
In this programme biomass is treated as part of agro-industrial research.
Artikel 74, stk. 3, i forordningen i den nederlandske oversættelse hæmmer arbejdstagerrepræsentanternes handle frihed og jeg citerer: »Forpligtet til at hemmelig holde (»geheimhouding«) de fortrolige oplysninger, som de modtager om virksomheden også i forhold til de arbejdstagere, som de repræsenterer.« Jeg vil pege på en modsætning mellem den franske, tyske og nederlandske tekst. Discrétion og vertraulich zu behandeln er ikke det samme som geheimhouding.
We regard this essential energy source as being in the field of nonnuclear energies and therefore consider that biomass should be reinstated in the NNE programme.
På dette område mener vi, at Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og Socialudvalget har gjort et positivt stykke arbejde med deres indsats for at stille mere konkrete forslag vedrørende arbejdstagernes rettigheder inden for rammerne af en ordning for Det Europæiske Selskab. Disse forslag har Venstrefløjs-Koalitionsgruppen også forsøgt at forbedre ved hjælp af konkrete ændringsforslag, idet vi står fast ved, at den nye ordning ikke bør være i modstrid med arbejdstagernes erhvervede rettigheder på nationalt plan.
GASÓLIBA I BÖHM (LDR), rapporteur. — (ES) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I should first like to thank my colleagues on the Energy Committee for their cooperation and hard work over the preparation of this report, which was approved unanimously at the last meeting of the Energy Committee; they succeeded in substantially improving the report I now have pleasure in submitting to Parliament.
Via det såkaldte Samarbejdsudvalg, et værdifuldt forslag fra fru Oddy, er dette muligt.
There is therefore a clear contradiction between this report and the one which follows and we are opposed to the view taken, up to now, by the Commission.
Jeg vil slutte med at nævne endnu et vigtigt punkt vedrørende beslutningsproceduren.
Other points we have raised relate to the timescale of the financial schedule, the inclusion of hyrocarbons and certain technical amendments proposed in the CREST report.
Van Outrive (S). — (NL) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, for første gang siden 1985 drøfter vi her kom missionsforslag, der handler om arbejdstagernes ret til information, til at blive hørt, medbestemmelse eller kontrol, og om den retlige beskyttelse af arbejdstagerrepræsentanter.
Mr President, this is a very important programme for a sector, the energy sector, of which we are particularly conscious at this time, when we are trying to find alternative, nonnuclear energy sources, with a view, of course, to guaranteeing the self-sufficiency in this area which the European Community ought to have.
Arbejdstagere og aktionærer bør have de samme rettigheder på dette område.
This is why we regard it as so important and we hope that the Commission will accept the amendments proposed in the report.
García Amigo (PPE). — (ES) Hr. formand, til en indledning takker jeg Kommissionen for den lige vægt, der er opnået i forslaget til direktiv.
My attitude to the Commission proposal was originally very critical, for two reasons : in the first place, because it is really only a re-working of the original JOULE programme, which was approved less than a year and a half ago, so I felt that there was little justification for this new presentation of a programme so recently approved.
Denne tilfredshed med forslaget fremgår selvfølgelig også af det forhold, at jeg ikke har stillet ændringsforslag til det, hvilket i øvrigt også er begrundet i, at jeg ikke ønsker at øge antallet af de allerede foreliggende ændringsforslag.
In the second place, because I had a number of reservations, both technical and substantial, which I shall refer to in a minute.
Jeg må sige, at jeg er forbløffet over medlemmernes viden om selskabsret, hvis man skal dømme ud fra kvantiteten af ændringsforslag.
This report has undergone a lengthy process of re-working and re-drafting, precisely because of these earlier reservations, but also in the light of various discussions I had with the Commissioner responsible, Mr Pandolfi, whose absence from what I regard as an important debate I deeply deplore.
Jeg kan naturligvis endnu ikke udtale mig om kvaliteten, hr. formand, da jeg først nu har modtaget ændringsforslagene på spansk.
I feel that a debate on a proposal for a four-year research and development programme in the field of nonnuclear energies should have been a priority for the Com missioner and I should like this criticism to be noted, as well as the fact that I totally disagree with one of the views taken by the Commissioner.
Det andet spørgsmål har to aspekter, hvoraf det ene er politiske og det andet juridisk.
Yet, I must make the following more particular observations.
vende forening med dens karakteristiske egenskaber: princippet om maksimal deltagelse og solidaritetsprincippet.
If the budget approved for this or that activity is a function of its perceived importance, then the budget for this programme should tell us something: ECU 157 million, as compared with a budget of ECU 458 million for controlled thermonuclear fusion.
For så vidt angår det sidstnævnte aspekt, som er det grundlæggende, er det, eftersom kun et veletableret og velordnet kooperativt selskab kan blive konkurrencedygtigt, nødvendigt at tilstræbe en ligevægt i den europæiske retsakt.
In the first place, therefore, we agree with the Committee on the Environment that these figures should probably have been reversed.
En ligevægt mel lem kooperativernes særegenskaber og nødvendigheden af at træffe hurtige og effektive beslutninger for at kunne konkurrere med kapitalselskaberne på et marked, der ikke vil gøre nogen indrømmelser til de produktionsenheder med demokratisk struktur, som der her er tale om.
However that may be, the number of amendments tabled in connection with the earlier research programme and the urgency of the environmental issues connected with the production of energy would justify the tripling of the budget for this new programme.