natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der skal bare ikke herske tvivl om, at jeg gerne ser, at også positive ting kommer frem, for næsten 50 % af danskerne har jo stemt ja.
This message is addressed in particular to the EFTA applicant states, and we plead with them not to complicate the prospects for the enlargement with which we are anxious to proceed.
En gang i mellem glemmer man det.
Finally, we proclaim our resolve to go forward after 30 June.
Men jeg forstår, og jeg accepterer, at Europa-Parlamentet er meget optaget af den situation, der er opstået efter det danske nej.
We voted against the third indent in paragraph 7 because we found it poorly worded, but paragraph 4 contains a firm statement of the same thing, leaving no doubt as to our intentions.
For ikke at lægge sten i vejen for de alvorlige forhandlinger, hvor alle tolv medlemslande skal yde deres bedste for i fællesskab at finde en fornuftig løsning på de problemer, vi står med, har jeg ønsket at undlade at stemme.
It is in this spirit that we shall be voting for this excellent motion and call upon all honourable Members to do likewise.
VAN DIJK (V). — (NL) Hr. formand, heldigvis er de skændige forslag, der er blevet fremført i dag om at fratage Danmark formandskabet og oven i købet at tvinge landet til at forlade Det Europæiske Fællesskabn, taget af bordet.
VAN DIJK (V). — (NL) Mr President, fortunately those outrageous proposals made here today to deprive Den mark of the Presidency and in addition to require it to leave the European Community have been rejected here.
Men dette betyder ikke, at det nu er rimeligt at stemme for beslutningen.
That does not mean that it is now worth supporting this resolution.
Hvorledes kan man sige nu, hvor Danmark ikke kan ratificere, fordi der blev afholdt en folkeafstemning, der var helt igennem demokratisk, sige, at en genforhandling er udelukket — der sad jo dog tolv regeringer omkring bordet.
How could one say, now that Denmark cannot ratify because a referendum has been held and been conducted extremely democratically, that re-negotiations are ruled out because there were twelve governments at the negotiating table?
Vi ved, at der næppe er grundlag for Maastricht i Europa.
We know that at the moment there is scarcely a basis for Maastricht in Europe.
Jeg begriber ikke, at denne forsamling kan være så ufornuftig at sige, at Danmark ikke vil få nogen chance for at ændre denne traktat, samtidig med at vi oplever, at Storbritannien uden videre forhaler sagen og har store vanskeligheder med at få traktaten ratificeret.
I do not understand how the Assembly can be living so much in a glass house as to say that Denmark will not be given a chance to change this treaty, whilst we see the United Kingdom simply deferring the matter, being given every chance to do so and having great difficulties itself in getting the treaty ratified.
Denne forskel mellem små og store lande er desværre kendetegnende for situationen i Europa.
This distinction between the little countries and the big is unfortunately typical of the situation in Europe.
Hvis dette ikke ændres, vil der ikke være noget grundlag for Maastricht, og så kan vi ønske nok så meget, at traktaten bliver ratificeret, og den vil sikkert blive ratificeret, men det vil ikke føre til noget som helst i fremtiden. Dette kan jeg kun beklage.
If that is not changed there will be no basis for Maastricht and then we may all of us want to see the treaty ratified, as it may in fact be, but then it will never lead anywhere in the future.
KELLETT-BOWMAN (PPE). — (EN) Hr. formand, når nogen begår selvmord, håber politiet og myndighederne, at han eller hun har efterladt sig et selvmordsbrev.
What is being mouthed about Maastricht with all the monotony of a Tibetan prayer wheel sounds like a necromantic attempt to bring a corpse back to life.
Jeg tror, at dette beslutningsforslag risikerer at blive et sådant selvmordsbrev. Jeg vil gerne se Maastricht-Traktaten godkendt i alle tolv medlemsstater, men Parlamentet må ikke behandle en medlemsstat, uanset hvor lille den er, som om det var et uartigt barn.
People simply will not admit that in its present form the treaty is now dead as a result of the Danish No vote and that for other EC countries to continue the ratification process is an illegal infringement of the principle of unanimity.
Der er en latinsk talemåde, som siger festina lente — skynd dig langsomt.
Perhaps that would produce a No vote too. Or are there two sorts of democracy in Europe?
BONDE (ARC). — Hr. formand, i diskussionen i dag er der ingen, som har oplyst, at der også skal være to folkeafstemninger i Frankrig.
Chamber want to vote for the socalled compromise resolution, which finds pushing the Danes out of the EC preferable to a renegotiation of the Maastricht Treaty.
Hr. Mitterrand regnede med et flertal på 80 %, som kunne bruges til at splitte den borgerlige opposition, men han fik kun sin godkendelse igennem fra et mindretal af de, der deltog i afstemningen: Der var flere vælgere, der stemte blankt og nej end dem, der stemte ja. Det bør hr. Cot notere sig.
In the Environment Committee's statement on subsidiarity, it clearly appears that every Member State shall have the possibility of making rules better than any norms which might be adopted by the EC.
Men i Frankrig er et relativt flertal åbenbart et flertal, som man skal respektere, mens vi i Danmark skal ændre vores grundlov, så der fremover kommer til at stå, at vi kan holde alle de folkeafstemninger, vi vil, hvis vi bare følger regeringen og stemmer ja.
The current treaties' wording on high norms is no longer used, but it is clearly stated that any harmonisation of environmental rules must take the highest norms as a starting point.
Parlamentet udviser i dag en mangel på respekt for elementære demokratiske spilleregler, som vil lamme dette Parlaments mulighed for at spille en større rolle i EF-samarbejdet.
These views held by the Committee on the Environment can only be implemented if the Maastricht Treaty is renegotiated, and therefore, also for environmental reasons, I shall vote against the joint motion for a resolution today.
Hvem kan have tillid til en forsamling, som truer med at bryde Traktatens egne regler?
The majority here believes we should not have special rules for Denmark and therefore a Europe à la carte.
Hvem er de næste, som skal trues på plads?
So the alternative is: eat or die!
Hvilke andre paragraffer i Rom-Traktaten og Maastricht-Traktaten skal ikke gælde?
We in the European Right cannot under any circumstances endorse that kind of all or nothing policy.
Det er ufatteligt, at Venstre-medlemmer i denne sal undlader at stemme til simple spørgsmål...
Europe will live on the basis of equal rights and mutual respect or it will not live at all!
FALCONER (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg har anmodet om ordet for en bemærkning til forretningsordenen ved rørende en udtalelse, fremsat af et medlem af Parlamentet.
NIELSEN (LDR). — (DA) My dream and genuine desire is to see cooperation in the Community growing ever closer and more binding.
Det er meget prisværdigt, at hr. Kellett-Bowman er så bekymret over, at andre medlemsstater hundser med Danmark. Jeg ønsker imidlertid, at han ville give udtryk for samme bekymring over for sin egen regering, der har hundset med den demokratisk valgte regering...
As a Danish liberal, I have been working for that for many years.
Man bruger ikke længere de nuværende Traktaters udtryk om høje normer, men siger udtrykkeligt, at al harmonisering af miljøbestemmelser skal tage udgangspunkt i de højeste normer.
But I understand and accept that the European Parliament is very concerned by the situation that has arisen after the Danish No.
Disse holdninger i Miljøudvalget kan kun gennemføres, hvis Maastricht-Traktaten gennemarbejdes på ny, og derfor vil jeg også af miljømæssige grunde afvise kom promisforslaget i dag.
Never have we in the Community, nor in Denmark in the many years I have been politically active, found ourselves in such a serious situation as now, where we have to try, through negotiation with the other countries, to find a solution we all can live with.
Ib CHRISTENSEN (ARC). — Hr. formand jeg stemmer imod det fælles beslutningsforslag, fordi det udviser foragt for danskernes ret til at afvise medlemskab af Unionen, fordi det latent truer Danmark, og fordi det ikke tager ringeste hensyn til Rom-Traktatens regler for trak tatændringer, der forudsætter enighed.
I have been actively involved in The Liberal Group's work to make the text more acceptable, but I must admit there are some points which in Denmark will have the opposite of the desired effect, and which will stir up entirely unnecessary opposition.
Alle er lige i EF, men nogle er mere lige end andre.
And that is something we can do without.
BJØRNVIG (ARC). — Hr. formand, hvordan kan et Parlament, som tidligt og silde påpeger, at de folkevalgte skal respekteres, i denne udtalelse give udtryk for, at det overhovedet ikke respekterer resultatet af en folkeafstemning?
BJØRNVIG (ARC). — (DA) Mr President, how can a parliament, which is constantly pointing out that those elected by the people must be respected as such, express the view in this statement that it has no respect for the result of a referendum?
I Rom-Traktaten er bestemmelsen om, at de nationale parlamenter skal ratificere traktatændringer, indført, fordi det jo kan ske, at en regering ikke repræsen terer sit folks vilje.
In the Treaty of Rome, the provision whereby national parliaments shall ratify amendments to the treaty was inserted because it can sometimes happen that a government does not represent the people's wishes.
Hvis en regerings mandat underkendes af folket, er der naturligvis kun et eneste svar på det, nemlig at man må gå tilbage til forhandlingsbordet.
If a government's mandate is not approved by the people, there is of course only one solution, and that is to return to the negotiating table.
Hvad i alverden skulle en ratifikationsproces dog ellers tjene til?
What use is a ratification process otherwise?
Jeg kan godt forstå, at man i de elleve andre lande må forvirres over den danske regering og det danske Folketing, som gennem 20 år har glemt at oplyse om det danske folks unionsmodstand, også over at den danske regering ikke er gået af.
I can well understand that people in the other eleven countries must be confused by the Danish Government and the Danish Folketing, which for 20 years has forgotten to mention the Danish people's opposition to union, and also by the Danish Government's failure to resign.
Men midt i al forvirringen bør det danske folk ikke overses, og regeringen er i hvert fald nu bundet af folkeafstemningen.
But in the midst of all the confusion, the Danish people ought not to be overlooked, and the Government is now in any case bound by the referendum.
Hvis man fremturer med beslutninger som denne, er der jo desværre kun en løsning, nemlig den, at Danmark efter en ny folkeafstemning undlader at ratificere, og at Maastricht følgelig ikke kan træde i kraft.
If people persist with decisions like this one, there is sadly only one remedy, and that is that Denmark, following a new referendum, fails to ratify, and that Maastricht as a result cannot come into force.
Parlamentets reaktion vil — hvis dette beslutningsforslag vedtages — give genlyd i de lande, der har søgt om medlemskab af EF, som et skræmmende eksempel på en total mangel på den mest elementære forståelse for demokrati og vil efter al sandsynlighed resultere i et rungende nej til medlemskab.
The Parliament's reaction will — if this motion for a resolution is approved — re-echo around those countries which have applied for membership of the EC, as a frightening example of a total lack of the most elementary understanding of democracy, and will very likely result in a resounding No to membership.
Jeg opfordrer alle til at stemme nej til dette misfoster, som er en skændsel for Parlamentet.
I urge everyone to vote against this misbegotten motion, which is a disgrace to this Parliament.
CHRISTIANSEN (S). — Formålet med at vedtage en beslutning her i dag burde kun kunne være at gøde bunden for en ny dansk folkeafstemning, så vi kan få afsluttet det mellemspil, vi har efter den 2. juni.
KELLETT-BOWMAN (PPE). — Mr President, when someone commits suicide the police and the authorities hope that he or she will leave a suicide note.
Det burde ikke skulle være formålet at gøre det vanskeligere for danske politikere at nå frem til et nyt grundlag for en ny folkeafstemning.
I think that this resolution is in danger of being a suicide note. lam in favour of seeing the Maastricht Treaty approved in all twelve Member States, but this Parliament must not treat a Member State, however small, as if it were a naughty child.
Da vi mødtes her i mandags, havde han en samlet socialistgruppe bag sig.
BONDE (ARC). — (DA) Mr President, in the discussion today, no-one has mentioned that there are going to be two referendums in France.
Det har han ikke i dag.
Mr Cot ought to take note of' that fact.
Vi havde en forståelse i Den Socialistiske Gruppe i sidste uge om en moderat og en åben holdning, der skulle hjælpe Danmark til en løsning.
But in France, a relative majority is apparently still a majority which must be respected, whilst we in Denmark have to alter our Constitution, so that we can hold as many referendums as we like, so long as we follow the government and vote in favour.
Den moderate holdning er sat over styr ved, at vi nu har en tekst på bordet, der samler stærke kræfter, som ikke ønsker at støtte en ny dansk folkeafstemning.
Parliament is today demonstrating a lack of' respect for elementary rules of democracy, which will
Jeg kan forsikre jer for, kammerater og kolleger, at det, I vedtager
SANDBÆK (ARC). — (DA) Mr President, I cannot understand why some of my colleagues here in the
CHRISTIANSEN nu, gør det vanskeligere i Danmark at finde det grundlag, hvorpå vi kan få en ny folkeafstemning.
BONDE hamper this Parliament's chances of playing a greater role in EC cooperation.
Jeg vil blot gentage, hvad jeg sagde i formiddags, at vi desværre ikke kan stemme her.
Who can have confidence in an assembly which threatens to break the Treaty's own rules?
Det er Europarådet, der er baseret på mellemstatsligt samarbejde, ikke Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
Who will be the next to be cowed into place?
Lige så lidt har Det Europæiske Fællesskab foregøglet at være et rent frihandelsområde.
Which other articles in the Treaties of Rome and Maastricht are not to apply?
Dette var EFTA's mål, og både Danmark og Storbritannien forlod denne organisation og ansøgte om medlems skab af Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
And who is to decide that the provisions are not to apply?
Alt dette må den danske offentlighed informeres om.
It is incredible that Danish Liberal Members in this Chamber abstain from voting on straightforward questions...
DILLEN (DR), skriftlig. — (NL) Siden det danske folk sagde »nej« til Maastricht-Traktaten, har der været uro omkring Danmark.
DILLEN (DR), in writing. — (NL) Since the Danes have said "no" to the Treaty of Maastricht, there has been no peace about Denmark.
Der er nu gået flere måneder, men stadigvæk er der mange Maastricht-konformister, der simpelthen ignorerer den danske folkeafstemning, som om den ikke havde fundet sted. Men ak!
That was months ago, but many Maastricht conformists would still like to hold forth at length and simply to brush the Danish referendum aside as if it had never taken place.
Al denne misinformation og manipulation har foreløbig ikke givet det ønskede resultat, så uden at blinke er man nu gået i gang med en ny taktik.
Without batting an eyelid, they try again, using a different tactic.
(Det fælles beslutningsforslag vedtoges)
(The President cut the speaker off)
Hvis man i dag på en objektiv og fordomsfri måde forsøger at gøre foreløbig status over situationen — for en endelig status kan vi hverken gøre i dag eller i morgen — så kan man bedst gøre det ved at parafrasere Shakespeares kendte ord: »There's something rotten in the state of Denmark« til: »There is something rotten against Denmark«.
Anyone who tries today, honestly, open-mindedly and without prejudice, to draw up a tentative balance-sheet — because we cannot have a final one today or tomorrow — will conclude that he had better paraphrase Shakespeare's well known "There's something rotten in the state of Denmark" as "There's something rotten opposed to Denmark".
Hermed har Maastricht-konformisterne bevist, at de ikke ønsker et samarbejde mellem jævnbyrdige folk, og at de ønsker at fratage folk muligheden for at stemme nej.
However, I wish he would express that concern to his own government which has bullied the democratically elected government...
Betænkning uden forhandling (dok.
(The President cut the speaker off)
ADAM (S), skriftlig. — (EN) Jeg stemmer imod denne betænkning af følgende grunde:
In this way the Maastricht conformists only prove that they do not envisage any cooperation of equal European peoples but have even denied the people the freedom to vote "no".
Da det første chok var ovre, prøvede man at lade som ingenting.
Once the first shock was over they added insult to injury.
Danmark eller ikke Danmark, hviskede man, Maastricht fortsætter.
Denmark or no Denmark, they whispered, Maastricht will go through.
Således fornægtede man ens egen underskrift, for Maastricht var som følge af det danske nej juridisk død.
So they disavowed their own signature, since Maastricht was legally dead because Denmark did not ratify it.
I stedet for at tage tyren ved hornene og øjeblikkleigt gå i gang med nye forhandlinger for at opnå en bedre traktat, fornærmede man det danske folk og tilsidesatte sin egen underskrift.
Instead of taking the bull by the horns and starting fresh negotiations right away to get a better treaty, they insulted the Danish people and dishonoured their own signature.
Nu vil man så indrømme Danmark forskelige undtagelsesregler for gennem en ny folkeafstemning at gennem tvinge et dansk ja.
Now they are to allow Denmark all kinds of exceptional measures so as to force a Danish "yes" out of them this time with a new referendum.
2) den oprindelige aftale med Kommissionen på det tidspunkt, hvor det tredje program godkendtes, var 2,0 mia ECU.
They are losing sight of the fact that, even unintentionally but inevitably, they are, so to speak, undermining the Treaty of Maastricht.
Man overser, at man så at sige uden at ville det, men uundgåeligt, udhuler Maastricht-Traktaten.
In short, the attitude to Denmark shows contempt for a European people and thus for all European peoples.
3) ved at indføre et bånd på 1,2 — 1,5 mia ECU opfordrer Parlamentet praktisk taget Rådet til at acceptere det laveste tal.
CHRISTIANSEN (S). — (DA) The purpose of adopting a resolution here today ought to be simply that of preparing the ground for a new Danish referendum, so that we can round off the interlude which began on 2 June.
Holdningen over for Danmark er udtryk for foragt for et europæisk folk og demmed for alle europæiske folk.
And I should also like to underline that for the benefit of my Group Chairman, Mr Cot, whose provocative speech I could well have done without here in our closing debate.
Den er udtryk for manglende respekt for ens egen underskrift.
When we met here on Monday, he had the backing of a united Socialist Group.
Den er udtryk for en en euro-jakobinsk totalitarisme.
He does not have that today.
4) betænkningen er uforenelig med Parlamentets gen tagne erklæringer om forsknings og udviklings betydning ved gennemførelse af økonomisk konvergens og samhørighed.
We had an understanding in The Socialist Group last week to adopt a moderate and open-minded attitude, which was to help Denmark towards a solution.
5) betænkningen er uforenelig med Parlamentets støtte til Delors-II-pakken, der kræver flere midler til forskning og teknologisk udvikling.
I assure you, comrades and colleagues, that what you are now adopting makes it more difficult in Denmark to find the basis on which we can get a new referendum.
En nedskæring i midlerne til forskning betyder, at EF's konkurrenceevne over for Japan og De Forenede Stater ikke forbedres.
Let me also say this to you: you cannot threaten the Danish voters, and it is also unreasonable to bring up and hold hostage the question of the EFTA countries in today's discussion.
VALVERDE LÓPEZ (PPE), skriftlig. — (ES) Danmarks problem i forbindelse med ratificeringen af Traktaten om Den Europæiske Union er baseret på en voldsom manipulation af den offentlige mening og en vedvarende misinformering af samme.
VALVERDE LÓPEZ (PPE), in writing. — (ES) The problem of Denmark as regards the ratification of the Treaty of European Union is based on a massive manipulation and constant misleading of public opinion.
Danmarks regeringer har over for offentligheden hemmeligholdt Det Europæiske Fællesskabs juridiske og politiske karakter og de endelige mål.
Danish Governments have concealed from public opinion the legal and political nature of the European Community and its ultimate aims.
End ikke nu fortæller man sandheden.
It appears impossible to tell the truth even today.
I det såkaldte nationale kompromis tales der fortsat om europæiske vflmfl/-¿»e/'í/íprocedurer. og der nævnes intet om, at med
The socalled "national compromise" keeps referring to European cooperation procedures and there is no mention of' the fact that, with the Treaty of Maastricht or without it, the basic Treaties and the Single European Act are based on the integration procedure and the exercise of shared sovereignties.
Vi tror, at det er nødvendigt at råde over større ressourcer, hvis vi skal sikre europæisk samhørig hed inden for Socialfonden og Regionalfonden samt højteknologi.
greater resources to ensure European cohesion in the areas of the social fund, regional fund, the cohesion fund and high technology.
Vi ønsker Maastricht plus et vedvarende europæisk program for jobskabelse og økonomisk gen rejsning.
We want Maastricht plus with a sustained European programme for jobs and recovery.
På dette felt har vi foretaget et tilbagetog, stillet over for Rådets uforsonlighed.
Here we have backed down in face of the intransigence from the Council.
Dette beklager vi.
We regret this.
Vi skynder os for langsomt til Europas bedste.
We are making haste too slowly for the good of Europe.
QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL (PPE), skriftlig. — (DE) Ved behandlingen af dette forslag møder Parlamentet vanskeligheder.
QUISTHOUDT­ROWOHL (PPE), in writing. — (DE) Parliament is faced with some difficulties in dealing with this report.
Med hensyn til det totalbeløb, som er nødvendigt for denne finansielle tilpasning, tager det hensyn til den fleksibilitet, som er påkrævet i det nuværende finansielle klima.
With regard to the overall sum needed for this financial adjustment, it is taking account of'the need for flexibility in the current financial climate.
Parlamentet er ikke ubetinget overbevist om, at Kommissionen — i betragtning af de administrative vanskeligheder, som den i vid udstrækning selv har skabt — har sat sin vilje igennem, og at de udgifter, som der opereres med i det tredje rammeprogram for 1992 og 1993, vil blive bundet fuldt ud.
It is convinced, not without some reservations, that the Commission — given the largely self­made administrative hurdles — has managed to ensure that the expenditure planned in the third framework programme for 1992 and 1993 is fully committed.
Denne opfattelse er allerede kommet til udtryk i udtalelsen om 1993-budgettet fra Energi, Forsknings- og Teknologiudvalget (ordfører: Gordon Adam).
This approach was already reflected in the opinion of' the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology on the 1993 budget (rapporteur: Gordon Adam).
Desuden fastslås det, at Kommissionen i sit forslag til det fjerde rammeprogram for året 1994 opererer med udgifter af størrelsesordenen 550 mio ECU.
Furthermore we note that in its proposal for the fourth framework programme for 1994 the Commission proposes expenditure amounting to ECU 550m.