natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg kan fortælle Dem, at de nederlandske kaffebrænderier tøvede meget i starten, men nu lader det til, at et stort antal små og mellemstore brænderier har indset, at de også kan drage nytte af den direkte kontakt, for de køber direkte uden mellemled hos de små producenter og betaler forlods.
The 1983 agreement has been extended for the past two years but with its economic provisions suspended following the collapse of negotiations for a new Coffee Agreement in July 1989.
I Nederlandene er der nu tale om femten kaffebrænderier, og der kommer stadig nye til.
Since that time we have seen a heavy over-supply on the exchanges.
Dette kontrolleres af forbrugeraktionen, for »Max Havelaar« er en forbrugeraktion.
While we do not believe that a new Coffee Agreement could or should try and deflect longterm market trends, it could have a useful role in introducing at least a measure of stability in the market.
I løbet af tre år har det næsten erobret 3% af markedet.
Tomorrow we will be having a press conference in this Parliament, which will be attended by many Members.
Hvad er for skellen mellem Max Havelaar-initiativet og tidligere initiativer i forbindelse med den såkaldte solidaritetsbevægelse med den tredje verden?
It is hoped that France will be the next country, and Britain is also about to take the plunge. Various things are going on in Germany and a number of other countries, not all of which belong to the European Community.
Med det nederlandske Max Havelaar-initiativ er der indført et garantimærke, som er let håndterligt for alle kaffe producenter og kaffebrænderier.
In recent days some progress has been made in the International Coffee Council in setting a timetable for launching and completing negotiations for a new coffee agreement.
I Nederlandene er der nu seksten kaffebrænderier, der bruger det, i Belgien er en række både nederlandske og belgiske brænderier også gået over til det.
That will involve intensive preparatory work at a technical level between now and next April with a view to completing formal negotiations by the end of December 1992.
I Europa er der dermed i alt 25 virksomheder, som anvender dette garantimærke.
I can accept that, but I must then emphasize that Max Havelaar is not one firm.
Hvad gør de rent faktisk?
Then other countries can join in this initiative.
Deres købspris, den pris, som de betaler til de små kaffebønder, ligger 15% over verdensmarkedsprisen.
Let it be an example, just as it is in the Dutch and Belgian Parliaments, of how to achieve better trade relations.
Og som De alle ved, faldt verdensmarkedsdprisen for kaffe drastisk i 1989, og det er jo i øvrigt et af de vigtigste produkter, når vi ser på handelstal og omfang.
It offers the possibility for the consuming public in the Netherlands and Belgium and more recently in Luxembourg to express their concern for the problems of coffee producers in current market conditions.
Jeg ved, at der er spørgsmål, bl.a. om hvorvidt man virkelig når ud til de små bønder. Hertil kan jeg kun sige: Ja, vi når ud til de små bønder.
BRITTAN, Sir Leon, Vice-President of the Commission. — Mr President, I am grateful for those clarifications.
I Udvalget om Udviklingssamarbejde har vi talt med et antal bønder fra Latinamerika, og de siger, at den lille del.
Of course I understand that the scheme is a commercially viable one, because, on the basis of the
Dette er en anden opgave for Kommissionen.
I am very glad to hear that.
Vi håber, at Europa-Parlamentet, hvis beslutningen vedtages, ligesom det belgiske og det nederlandske parlament vil gå over til at købe Max Havelaarkaffe.
The question of ordering coffee in Commission premises, as I have said, will be examined in the way I have described but, as I have also said, it is already available in the Berlaymont Economat.
Hvis denne aktion på initiativ af en uafhængig organisation lykkes, og det er jeg overbevist om, at den gør, så er det et bevis på, at producenter af monokulturprodukter som kaffe, men også kakao og te, kan hjælpes også på denne måde.
The vote will take place at 12.00 noon tomorrow.(The sitting closed at 10.30 p.m.) facts and the information relating to it, consumers are prepared to buy Max Havelaar coffee and to pay what it costs to have it.
Men det vil ikke sige, at udviklingslandene, som i vid udstrækning er afhængige af eksportindtægter fra ét enkelt produkt, på denne måde kan løse deres problemer.
I am glad to hear that countries beyond the ones I have mentioned are joining the scheme and wish the press conference well in giving publicity to that fact.
Max Have laar-initiativet yder et bidrag i den nuværende situation, men det er stadigvæk nødvendigt med en økononisk spredning for at mindske disse landes ensidige afhængighed. Også på dette område forventer vi en kraftig aktion fra Kommissionens og medlemsstaternes side.
I also think it is important to appreciate that Max Havelaar is an initiative and not the name of a brand mark and that there are several different enterprises producing it.
Til sidst vil jeg komplimentere fru Van Putten for hendes mod, og jeg ved, hvad det betyder, når fru Van Putten udviser mod. Det er nemlig både utåleligt og uimodståeligt.
As far as the use of the coffee is concerned, as I have explained, we cannot compel the other institutions to use it ; Parliament has made its choice and
Dette må vi naturlig vis også til stadighed gøre noget ved.
Agenda for next sitting: see Minutes.
Sir Leon Brittan, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg har ikke noget forhåndskendskab til emnet, og jeg har fundet denne debat fascinerende.
B3-1484I91) by Mr Alavanos and Mr Herzog, (Doc.
MØDET TIRSDAG DEN 8. OKTOBER 1991
The Phare programme
B3-1449/91) af Pompidou, (dok. B31454/91) af Langes m.fl., (dok.
(continuation)
Ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder — Betænkning (dok.
Equal treatment for men and women — Report (Doc.
A3-238/91) af Fontaine
A3-238I91) by Mrs Fontaine
Aktuel og uopsættelig debat (foreslåede emner)
Topical and urgent debate (subjects pro posed)
Statistikker for udveksling af goder mellem medlemsstaterne — Indstilling ved andenbehandling (dok. A3-232/91) af von Wogau von Wogau, Regalia, Scrivener (Kommissionen) sionen)
Statistics relating to the trading of goods between Member States — Recommendation for a second reading (Doc.
De nye tyske EF-borgeres demokratiske repræsentation i Europa-Parlamentet — Mundtlige forespørgsler (dok.
Democratic representation of the new German EC citizens in the European Parliament— Oral questions (Doc.
B3-1447/91) af Chanterie, (dok. B3-1483/91) af Alavanos m.fl.
B3-1447/91) by Mr Chanterie, (Doc.
Forsknings- og udviklingsprogram indenfor bioteknologi — Betænkning (dok.
Research and technological development programme in the field of biotechnology — Report (Doc.
A3227/91) af Falqui
A3227/91) by Mr Falqui
Videnskabeligt og teknologisk samarbejde mellem Det Europæiske Fællesskab og de europæiske tredjelande — Betænkning (dok.
Scientific and technological cooperation be tween the European Community and European nonmember countries — Report (Doc.
A3-251/91) af Larive
A3-251/91) by Mrs Larive
A3­152/91) af De Gucht
No 3-409/33
Ensartet valgmåde for valg til Europa­Parlamentet (fortsættelse)
Uniform electoral procedure for the European Parliament (continuation)
Kommissionens redegørelse om dens forbud mod opkøb af De Havilland
Sir Leon Brittan (Commission), Mr Desmond, Mr Merz, Mr Galland, Mr Cassidy, Mr Speciale, Mr Pasty, Mr Megret, Mr Van der Waal, Mr Roumeliotis, Mr Bourlanges, Mr
FORSÆDE: FERNANDO PÉREZ ROYO
IN THE CHAIR: MR PEREZ ROYO and I think it ought to be because this statement might preclude a debate on a subject where there is Euratom responsibility, so I would like the Minutes to be corrected on these two counts.
Protokollen fra mødet i går er
PRESIDENT. — Mrs Ewing, the Minutes will be corrected accordingly.
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg den som godkendt.
Zagreb was in fact bombed yesterday, as we saw on television.
Lord O'Hagan (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg henviser til side 12, del I, punkt 8, i protokollen.
O'HAGAN, The Lord (ED). — Mr President, I should like to refer you to page 11 of the Minutes.
Her står der under fastlæggelsen af arbejdsplanen for den 11. oktober, at »efter anmodning fra McMahon og 14 andre medlemmer, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 74, opførtes en redegørelse fra Kommissionen om Kommissionens og den britiske regerings tilbagehol­delse af en rapport om Det Forenede Kongeriges forvaltning af Den Europæiske Socialfond på dags­ordenen for denne dag«.
Halfway down, you will see that on 11 October, at the request of Mr McMahon and 14 other Members pursuant to Rule 74, there will now be a Commission statement on the alleged suppression by the Commission and the British Government of a report on the UK management of the European social fund.
Jeg tager imidlertid ordet for en rettelse til protokol­len.
I should like to ask whether Rule 74 is exclusively for the use of the Socialist Group and the British Socialist section or are other groups in Parliament permitted to use this rule?
Hvad angår mit indlæg i forbindelse med fast­sættelse af arbejdsplanen (side 12, del I, punkt 8, under »fredag den 11. oktober«) er mine udtalelser forkert refereret.
It seems to me that, in a situation of this kind, to wait until Thursday would be a serious, irresponsible course for our Institution to take.
Hvad jeg reelt sagde, var, at såfremt Kommissionen ikke var rede til at afgive en redegørelse, kunne emnet opføres på dagsordenen for debatten om aktuelle og uopsættelige spørgsmål.
I therefore call on the President to use his powers to bring forward to today an immediate statement from the Council on the Yugoslav situation.
Det andet punkt, jeg ønsker at påpege, er, at De, hr. formand, fremsatte en udtalelse, der ikke er refereret i protokollen.
Secondly, I should like to ask you, while understanding your generosity seeing the way things are going, not to allow Parliament to become a protest bill for the British Socialists who know they are going to lose the next general election in the United Kingdom.
De sagde, at De ikke ønsker at tage arbejdet fra medlemmerne af Underhuset.
PRESIDENT. — Mrs Aglietta, your request is noted.
Jeg finder, at denne udtalelse skal nævnes i protokollen, efter­som den kan betyde udelukkelse af enhver debat om emner, der vedrører Euratoms ansvarsområde; jeg anmoder om, at protokollen rettes på de to omtalte punkter.
I shall be attending this morning a meeting between the President, Mr Baron Crespo, and the group chairmen to decide on the urgencies and I am sure this meeting will give full consideration to your proposal which, moreover, I consider very justified.
Formanden. — Fru Ewing, protokollen vil blive rettet i overensstemmelse hermed.
EWING (ARC). — Mr President, I would first like to say that Lord O'Hagan is wrong, because although I am not in the Socialist Group I support Mr McMahon.
Det vil jeg gerne bede Dem om at korrigere.
What I said was that if no statement was to be made by the Commission, could the subject be included as an urgency.
Aglietta (V) — (IT) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne tage tråden op fra det indlæg, som hr. Taradash kom med i går aftes om forværringen af den jugoslaviske situation. Zagreb blev i går bombarderet, som vi faktisk kunne se i fjernsynet.
The other point is that you, Mr President, made a statement which is not included in the Minutes.
I henhold til artikel 74,
That has not been included,
Derfor anmoder jeg om en forlængelse af fristen til kl. 20.00.
I am proposing that we put back the deadline to 8 p.m. tonight.
stk 2. i forretningsordenen kan formanden anmode Rådet om at fremsætte en øjeblikkelig erklæring i Parlamentet.
Consequently, Mr President, I would ask for a check to be made with a view to amending the Minutes, assuming — and I am sure about this — that I was not hearing things.
Formanden. — Hr. Metten, jeg har netop meddelt, at fristen er forlænget til kl. 19.00 i aften.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Metten, the deadline has already been extended.
Der er ingen grund til en yderligere forlængelse, der desuden ville være minimal.
There is no reason to extend it any later.
Mig forekommer det, at det at vente til torsdag i en situation af denne art er alvorligt og uansvarligt af vor institution.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Nordmann, we will look into this. I understood that the President, Mr Baron Crespo, said yesterday that this would be discussed in the Bureau.
Beumer (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, skal forhand lingen tjene noget formål, så må vi høre svarene på spørgsmålene og eventuelt kunne foretage ændringer i de foreslåede udtalelser.
METTEN (S). — Mr President, the debate starts at 6 p.m. so we have to set the deadline for amendments after the debate. That is why I am asking for it to be put back to 8 p.m.
Jeg støtter derfor hr. Mettens anmodning om at fastsætte fristen for beslutningsforslag til kl. 20.00.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Metten, I just said that the deadline has been put back to 7 p.m. There is no reason to extend it even further by such a small amount.
Formanden. — Fru Aglietta, Deres anmodning er ført til protokols.
LAMASSOURE (LDR). — (FR) On a different subject, Mr President, with your leave.
Dette forslag, som jeg finder yderst berettiget, kan behandles på mødet mellem Parlamentets formand og gruppeformændene i for middag, hvor listen over emner til debatten om aktuelle og uopsættelige spørgsmål behandles.
Since our meeting yesterday, a democratically elected parliament, in Zagreb, has been bombed. I do not think our Parliament should start today's proceedings without registering its indignation, in one form or another, at this tragedy.
Formanden. — Hr. Beumer, jeg tror ikke, det vil gøre den store forskel.
BEUMER (PPE). — (NLJ Mr President, if the debate is to serve any purpose, we must be able to digest the answers to the questions and possibly make changes to the proposed statements.
Jeg har lige meddelt, at fristen for at indgive forslag til beslutning som afslutning på forhandlingen er fastsat til kl. 19.00, hvilket er en rimelig frist.
I therefore support Mr Metten's request that the deadline for tabling resolutions be set at 8 p.m.
Pasty (RDE). — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg anmoder om, at det i protokollen fra mødet i går, side 10, del I, punkt 8 under »tirsdag den 8. oktober«, fremgår, at Kommissionens redegørelse om forbuddet mod opkøbet af selskabet De Havilland, efterfulgt af forhandling, opførtes på foranledning af RDE-Gruppen.
We shall have an opportunity to discuss the issues later on in our partsession, but I feel we should all join together in expressing our indignation and solidarity, both with our colleagues in the Zagreb parliament and with a people under attack from its own army.
Hr. Pasty, denne udeladelse vil blive udbedret.
PRESIDENT. — Mr Beumer, I do not see any major difference.
Chanterie (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, det drejer sig om en meget vigtig redegørelse og en meget vigtig efterfølgende forhandling.
PRESIDENT. — Thank you, Mr Lamassoure, but as you yourself have just noted there will be a formal sitting and an opportunity to debate in full the overall situation in Yugoslavia.
De har måske læst i pressen, at visse kolleger er af den opfattelse, at der bør fremsættes forslag om mistillidsvotum til Kom missionen.
LEHIDEUX (DR). — (FR) Mr President, I wish to support what has just been said by Mr Nordmann and to ask the President a question.
Når så vigtige ting står på spil, så må man have lejlighed til ikke alene at høre Kommissionens redegørelse, men også til behørigt at følge forhandlingen med henblik på bagefter at fremsætte et beslutningsforslag.
Is it now accepted practice to ignore the things that Members say when they do not suit the presidency and draw up Minutes that do not give a true record, since what was said yesterday was very clear?
Metten (S). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg har et spørgsmål vedrørende protokollen.
CHANTERIE (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, the statement and the debate that will follow it are very important.
Det drejer sig om fristen for beslutningsforslag til De Havilland.
You may have read in the press that some Members feel that there should be a motion of noconfidence in the Commission.
I aften kl. 18.00 afgiver Kommissionen en redegørelse herom efterfulgt af en forhandling.
I therefore feel, Mr President, that, as the sitting is scheduled to end at 8 p.m. and this will possibly be the last item on the agenda, it would be a good thing for the deadline for the tabling of resolutions to be set at 8 p.m.
Der er mange spørgsmål herom i alle grupper.
LEHIDEUX going to be referred to the Bureau of Parliament.
Vi skal imidlertid allerede indgive beslutningsforslagene inden i dag kl. 12.00.
So is the practice now to draw up Minutes that are false, saying that they will doubtlessly be put right later?
Det er lidt tåbeligt, især ud fra de spørgsmål, som vi alle har.
PRESIDENT. — Mrs Lehideux, we are not trying to manipulate anything.
Jeg vil derfor gerne foreslå en forlængelse af fristen til i aften kl. 20.00.
I said that we will check exactly what was said yesterday in the Chamber.
Så har vi hørt Kommissionens redegørelse og har fået svar på vore spørgsmål.
I believe, that this will be checked, that the President spoke of submitting this matter to the Bureau.
Så er vi langt bedre i stand til at fremsætte beslutningsforslag.
But at all events we will look into whether a proposal was made and whether it was accepted that this should be held back in the way to which you have referred.
Formanden. — Hr. Chanterie, det var med henblik på at lette arbejdet for alle, herunder også for sekretariatet.
DOMINGO SEGARRA (GUE). — (ES) Mr President, an error on page 20 of the Minutes, claiming I belong to the PPE group, should be corrected.
Fristen foresloges fastsat til kl. 19.00.
(The Minutes were approved)
Men eftersom flere politiske grupper ønsker en yderligere forlængelse, er det ikke noget problem for formanden at forlænge fristen til kl. 20.00 i aften.
As for the factual matter, I wish to come down firmly in favour of the urgency and the need for this Parliament to put its opinion to the Council of Ministers.
Hr. Metten, fristen er forlænget til kl.
EWING (ARC). — Mr President, on a point of order, the groups were not unanimous.
Metten (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg ved, at fristen er fastsat til kl. 12.00 i dag.
LATAILLADE (RDE). — (FR) Thank you, Mr President, for giving the floor to the chairman of the Subcommittee on Fisheries.
Jeg foreslår, at fristen forlænges til kl. 20.00.
The Committee has already prepared its position on the issue and indeed its report was prepared in readiness to deal with it.
Det er et formelt forslag.
Therefore the urgency is accepted.
Formanden. — Hr. Metten, fristen er allerede for længet én gang.
EWING (ARC). — Mr President, when the deadline for amendments closed, the documents were not available.
Der er ingen grund til yderligere forlængelse.
Tremendously important matters are involved.
Metten (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, forhandlingen begynder kl. 18.00, og der må fastsættes en passende frist for indgivelse af ændringsforslag efter forhand
In the case of the eleventh amending regulation, the Commission wanted us to go back to a report by Mr Garcia which had already been rejected in May/June and, moreover, to come up with a completely different vote.
Nordmann (LDR). — (FR) Hr. formand, vedrørende del I, punkt 2, om beretning fra Undersøgelsesudvalget om Racisme og Fremmedhad.
VAZQUEZ FOUZ (S). — (ES) Mr President, I wish to make two points : one formal and one factual.
Jeg for stod eller troede at have forstået, at hr. Galland anmodede om, at offentliggørelsen af denne beretning, hvis indhold der kan sættes spørgsmålstegn ved, eftersom mindretalssynspunkterne ikke nævnes heri, stilles i bero, indtil der foreligger en afgørelse fra Præsidiet.
Formally speaking, I do not know who is responsible for the fact that we are discussing this right now, because if this was really necessary procedurally, then we should have been warned in the committee, where the issue was debated
Denne anmodning er ikke refereret i protokollen.
Mrs Ewing, if you could listen, I am saying a few words which might interest you.
I stedet står der noget, som jeg ikke har hørt, men det skyldes måske døvhed fra min side, nemlig at der eventuelt ville blive tale om en tilføjelse. jelse.
I was saying that, un fortunately, you were not there but that you might have put forward good arguments concerning the fishing fleets in Scotland.
Jeg anmoder derfor om, at dette punkt undersøges og i givet fald rettes, såfremt det ikke er mig, der har været udsat for et hørebedrag, hvilket jeg selv er tilbøjelig til at mene.
COLINO SALAMANCA (S), Chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Develop ment. — (ES) Mr President, I simply wish to state that the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, at its last meeting, examined the Council request for urgent procedure on this Regulation on support for soya beans, rapeseed and sunflower seed and decided unanimously to reject it.
den nøjagtige ordlyd af de udtalelser, der blev fremsat her i salen i går, vil blive undersøgt nær mere.
The one request that we are making today is that, since only group amendments were admissible, this being necessary in order to meet the requirements of urgency, the procedure adopted should allow Mrs Ewing to table amendments in a personal capacity, as she wanted to do, since her group would not agree to her doing so in their collective name.
Jeg mener at kunne huske — men det vil blive undersøgt nærmere — at Parlamentets formand svarede, at Præsidiet ville genbehandle sagen.
That is the background to this matter, Mr President. I think we can vote to accommodate the Council's request.
Det vil under alle omstændigheder blive undersøgt, om der rent faktisk blev fremsat forslag om, at offentlig gørelsen af beretningen stilledes i bero, og om dette forslag godkendtes.
At any rate, it will make no difference to the ulterior motives that are held on this issue or to the decisions already taken in advance by a good number of honourable Members.
Formanden. — Hr. Nordmann, den nøjagtige ordlyd af hr. Gallands udtalelser vil blive undersøgt nær mere.
BRITTAN, Sir Leon, Vice-President of the Commission. — Mr President, I will not hold up the proceedings further but I just want to make it clear that the Commission fully supports the proposal for urgent procedure in this matter.
Under alle omstændigheder mener jeg at huske, at Parlamentets formand, hr. Barón Crespo, svarede, at Præsidiet ville genbehandle spørgsmålet.
Undoubtedly, the Council and Commission agree that the criterion for the urgency concerns the compromises reached at GATT and in particular the position of the GATT panel on soya.
(Protokollen godkendtes) ')
(Expressions of Approval)
Lamassoure (LDR). — (FR) Vedrørende et helt andet emne, hr. formand.
Earlier this year Parliament gave its opinion on the proposals on the prices for agricultural products and on related measures for the 1991/92 marketing year.
Siden mødet i går er et demokratisk valgt parlament blevet udsat for bombardementer i Zagreb.
So Parliament has been aware of the proposed timetable. To allow that decision to be made, the Commission tabled a proposal on 31 July 1991.
Europa-Parlamentet kan efter min mening ikke undlade at tilkendegive sin harme over disse angreb.
The background to this change was the need to bring Community support arrangements into line with the Community's international legal obligations as de termined by the conclusions of a GATT soya panel in December 1989. It is now urgent that Parliament gives
C3-241/91) til forordning om tiende ændring af forordning (EØF) nr. 3094/86 om fastlæggelse af tekniske foranstaltninger til bevarelse af fiskeressourcerne
C3-327/91) for a regulation amending for the twelfth time Regulation (EEC) No 3094/86 laying down certain technical measures for the conservation of fishery resources.
Colino Salamanca (S), formand for Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Udvikling af Landdistrikter. — (ES) Hr. formand, fra Kommissionens side er der intet til hinder for anvendelsen af uopsættelighedsproceduren i forbindelse med disse betænkninger.
BOCKLET (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, the Commission has made statements that are not correct and therefore need to be rectified.