natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vi har mange meget stærke og dygtige jurister i Parlamentet.
On that score, Mrs Green, we in the Netherlands are introducing Kok's 75-cent tax in stages, in order not to stymie consumption.
Lad dem udnytte deres færdigheder og udarbejde lige nøjagtigt, hvordan et forbud på passende måde kan gennemføres i Det Europæiske Fællesskab i stedet for at forsøge at hindre indførelsen af dette forbud, som skal være til vor befolknings bedste.
If we are unwilling to ban smoking, then we have here a product which has been legally marketed and no one can suddenly proscribe the sale of a legal product on purely moral grounds after lining their pockets with the proceeds of manufacturing the product which, to boot, benefits from Community subsidies!
Dette er ikke nogen eksklusiv nederlandsk holdning.
Naturally many people are alarmed that this proposal is a test case.
Hr. Langes vil gerne skrive under på dette.
My group believes in responsible adult people.
Der er virkelig ikke noget som helst behov for fortsat at tillade reklame for produkter, som har dræbt og fortsat vil dræbe titusinder og hundredetusinder af mennesker i Det Europæiske Fællesskab, som om der blot var tale om levnedsmidler.
We believe the answer lies in a responsible industry which includes the import trade which is bound by strict agreements throughout Europe and which voluntarily does not target young people. This is how Europe can be what it set out to become : a strong domestic market for a healthy, responsible, self-regulating industry.
Peijs (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg håber, at fru Green også lige vil lytte til mig, for jeg har også lyttet til hende, tror jeg.
It is not true that we have failed to do that in the Netherlands ; in the field of alcohol the Netherlands presents an excellent example of a self-regulating market.
Jeg begyndte selv at ryge, da jeg var 18, og jeg holdt op med at ryge for halvandet år siden, ikke fordi der dengang eksisterede reklame, eller fordi der nu er mindre reklame.
I would also be perfectly happy to see tobacco advertising subject to strict rules, as Mrs Peijs said.
Til dem, som siger, at reklame' skulle have indflydelse på, om man begynder at ryge, vil jeg sige, at i Kina er der ud af én milliard mennesker, én milliard og én, som ryger, uden at der findes reklame.
But a ban on advertising is not the right way to go about it, because who can tell me that one ban will not lead to another ? Some people may well call for a ban on advertising alcohol, coffee and maybe even cars.
Jeg tror, at det dermed måske er bevist, at rygning også er en vane, som skal afvises.
That comparison is obviously irrelevant because a product like heroine is illegal.
Men vi taler her om et reklameforbud, måske ikke et fuldstændigt forbud, men alligevel et temmelig fuld stændigt forbud.
That too is a spurious comparison because the ban on medicines only applies to medicines solely available on prescription.
Det forekommer mig, at vi med dette forslag er på den forkerte vej, som fører os til noget, som vi egentlig slet ikke vil.
Tobacco products, on the other hand, are still perfectly legal and no prescription is needed to buy them.
Det bliver bestemt ovenfra, hvad vi må gøre.
That is why we must not start thinking of this type of ban.
Når det så trods alt drejer sig om noget, som vi ikke må gøre, ville det måske være bedst at gribe dette an ved roden, trække tobaksplanten op med rødder og sørge for, at der ikke dyrkes tobak nogen steder længere.
And if we do start thinking of it, then we must first of all carefully think through all the possible consequences, because tobacco is only one product among many. We may well be creating a precedent and find ourselves on a slippery slope before we know it.
Men først vil jeg lige sige, at artikel 100 A efter min opfattelse med urette bruges som retsgrundlag for dette direktiv.
This view is not exclusive to the Netherlands.
De argumenter, som Kommissionen og andre har anført herfor, kan i hvert fald ikke overbevise mig.
My colleague, Mr Langes, also supports it.
Jeg bliver højlydt forbavset, når jeg her hører alt dette.
Mr President, we must be consistent.
Jeg forstår ikke, at alle disse mennesker kan blive så emotionelle og så tale om et forbud mod reklame i stedet for et forbud mod tobak.
I am against smoking, I am not against advertising, but I am in favour of freedom.
Hvorfor skulle man i himlens navn ikke forbyde rygning, når De er så overbevist om, at De har ret?
BERTENS (LDR). — (NL) Mr President, I must stress that I am speaking in a personal capacity in this debate.
Det foruroligende er, at vi begyndte dette Fællesskab for at nå frem til en storstilet deregulering og netop ikke for i stadig højere grad og stadig mere detaljeret at ville patronisere.
I myself started smoking on my 18th birthday and gave it up 18 months ago not because of the advertising at that time nor because there are now fewer advertisements.
Jeg konstaterer af Kommissionens for slag, at vi ikke vil forbyde rygning. Og hvorfor ikke?
And to anyone who claims that advertising encourages people to start smoking I would reply that in China out of one billion people there are, I believe, a billion and one smokers and no advertisements.
Af nationale budgetmæssige grunde måske?
I think that proves that smoking is a habit which can be kicked.
Men mine indvendinger mod forslaget går som sagt videre og dybere end blot retsgrundlaget.
But we are talking here about a ban on advertising, perhaps not a total ban but definitely a fairly complete ban.
Pålæggelsen af et reklameforbud for tobaksprodukter berører i virkeligheden det væsentlige i vor — ja, det er næsten et lige så uartigt ord som tobak — frie markedsøkonomi.
It seems to me that this proposal is taking us down the wrong track which leads to something that we do not really want.
Med rette er mange bekymrede over, at dette forslag er en prøveballon.
CASSIDY (ED). — Mr President, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy states in its opinion that the draft directive banning advertising is not the way to deal with the problem of smoking.
Det mærkværdige er imidlertid, at EF, hvis hensigt det engang var at gøre et opsplittet marked til ét og at tilbyde erhvervslivet et overordentlig stærkt hjemme marked for at opnå en stærk eksportstilling, nu
The Community is hypocritical in spending millions of ECU per year to help producers grow unsaleable tobacco which it then dumps on the world market.
Naturligvis erkender jeg uden videre betydningen af befolkningens sundhed, og ingen vil sige, at rygning ikke er skadelig for helbredet.
In fact, the Community is guilty of exporting cancer-causing substances.
Der er risiko for, at hver sjette storryger en dag får lungekræft.
I am and have always been a fanatical non-smoker.
Det er, som om han spillede russisk roulette og mod sin tinding rettede en revolver, hvis magasin indeholdt én enkelt kugle.
SCHWARTZENBERG (S). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, two questions have today been raised.
Er hr. Verniers betænkning at betragte som et indgreb i ytringsfriheden?
this on responsible self-regulation founded on a code of conduct.
Det er ikke et indgreb i friheden, for der er ikke tale om at forbyde rygning eller salg af tobak.
Let us set an example by not smoking and not preach here on the basis of the principle 'do as I say but not as I do'.
Alle har lov til at ryge, hvis de har lyst til det, alle har endog lov til at forgifte sig under forudsætning af, at de er blevet informeret.
More education, more information, better examples, all of that before we start banning social habits, as this may be a step on the way to curtailing freedoms.
Lad storrygerne i dag fortsætte med at ryge, hvis de ønsker det, men man skal ikke tilskynde dem til at ryge mere, og man skal heller ikke tilskynde dem til at ryge, der endnu ikke er begyndt — jeg tænker på børn og unge mennesker.
In this instance, we consider that what has been proposed should be the last resort and that we have not yet exhausted all the means available to us.
reklameforbud er ikke den rigtige måde, for hvem siger ikke, at det ene vil føre til det andet?
Yes, tobacco is a toxin. Every year, it kills hundreds of thousands of people in the Community.
Nogle vil måske også gerne have et reklameforbud for alkohol, for kaffe og måske endog for biler.
A heavy smoker runs a one in six risk of one day suffering from lung cancer.
Hvis skadelighed for befolkningens sundhed er hovedmotivet, så ville det være konsekvent.
It is as if he were playing at Russian roulette, holding to his head a revolver loaded with a single bullet.
Et absolut forbud mod tobak?
Seven out of ten Europeans favour a ban on tobacco advertising.
Men læg mærke til, at Fællesskabet i stor udstrækning subsidierer dyrkningen af tobak.
I believe that the majority of speakers in this debate have shown eloquently, adequately and passionately the need to support this proposal.
Tilhængerne af et reklameforbud for tobak bruger det argument, at der heller ikke må reklameres for heroin.
Does Mr Vernier's report undermine freedom of expression?
Det er klart, at man ikke kan foretage denne sammenligning, for et produkt som heroin er illegalt.
No it does not: there is no question of prohibiting smoking or the sale of tobacco.
Der gøres også opmærksom på det eksisterende reklameforbud for medicin.
Everyone is free to smoke if he so wishes, to poison himself provided he is fully informed.
Heller ikke her kan man sammenligne, for forbudet mod reklame for medicin vedrører kun den form for medicin, som udelukkende fås på recept.
Let heavy smokers continue to do as they wish, but do not encourage them to smoke still more and do not encourage those who do not smoke to take up smoking — I am thinking here of children and teenagers.
Tobaksprodukter derimod er stadig fuldstændig legale, og der behøves ingen recept for at få dem.
In terms of the present death rate in the European Community, the entire adult population of my Euroconstituency — that is 750 000 people — would have been wiped out in the last two years.
Derfor må vi ikke begynde med den slags forbud.
The London borough of Merton, which I represent, has the highest smokingrelated death rate in the region.
Og hvis der så alligevel tænkes på det, så må vi først tænke alle mulige konsekvenser grundigt igennem, for tobak er ét spørgsmål, som ikke står alene.
Over 8 000 people in this area are admitted to NHS hospitals every year because of illnesses caused by smoking, thus adding an enormous burden to the costs of the National Health Service.
Muligheden for, at der skabes præcedens, er i allerhøjeste grad til stede, og inden vi ved af det, befinder vi os så på et skråplan.
The British Medical Association says smoking is killing 106 000 women each year in the European Community.
Vi skal derfor forbyde plakater på murene, annoncer i aviserne, annoncer i radio og fjernsyn samt automater, og kun tobaksudsalg skal have tilladelse til at sælge. Er det konsekvent, og er det moralsk at tillade reklamer under henvisning til en falsk forestil ling om ytringsfrihed? Nej.
We must ban wall advertising, newspaper advertise ments, television and radio advertising, cigarette machines; only tobacconists should be authorized.
Er det legitimt at for byde? Ja.
Is it legitimate to ban it ?
Valverde López (PPE). — (ES) Størstedelen af medlemmerne er formodentlig enige i analysen af problemet.
VALVERDE LÓPEZ (PPE). — (ES) Mr President, I believe that most of us agree on the analysis of the problem.
Hvad der derimod eventuelt ikke hersker enighed om, er, hvilke midler der skal bringes i anvendelse.
What divides us on this occasion is the issue of the methods which should ultimately be applied.
Jeg vil gerne i forbindelse med denne forhandling om reklame for tobaksvarer fremsætte et par principielle betragtninger.
I wish to make, in this debate on tobacco advertising, a number of statements of principle.
Cassidy (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, Udvalget om Økonomi, Valutaspørgsmål og Industripolitik siger i sin udtalelse, at direktivforslaget, som forbyder reklamer, ikke er måden at behandle problemerne med rygning på.
I am quite appalled at the prevarication of some Members on the 'right' of this Parliament who have clearly been listening far too much to the very strong tobacco lobby we have seen over the last 12 months on this issue.
For det første at jeg er fuldstændig overbevist om, at tobaksrygning er farligt for sundheden.
The first is that I am firmly persuaded of the definite health risks of tobacco.
Jeg mener ligeledes, at samfundet bør intensivere indsatsen for at hindre, at antallet af rygere øges, og at ikkerygeres rettigheder i gruppesammenhæng skal for svares.
I further believe that society should redouble its efforts to prevent an increase in the number of smokers and, similarly, that in group relations, the rights of non-smokers must be protected.
Der må lidt efter lidt skabes en stemning i samfundet af, at rygning er farligt for helbredet og en social gene; der må træffes afskrækkende foran staltninger, såsom forhøjelse af priser og afgifter, forbud mod at ryge på lukkede offentlige steder og i transportmidlerne; de unge må bekyttes mod visse reklametypers gennemslagskraft.
We must proceed by encouraging the view that smoking is damaging to health and socially unacceptable; we must take measures which help deter smoking, such as increasing prices and taxes, banning smoking in enclosed public places and on transport; we must protect young people from being won over by certain types of propaganda.
Formodentlig af denne grund har forbuddet mod reklame for tobaksvarer i tv fået stor opbakning.
That is why there has, in this instance, been great support for a ban on the television advertising of tobacco.
Schwartzenberg (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, i dag foreligger der to spørgsmål.
LULLING (PPE). — (FR) Mr President, the proposal that all direct and indirect advertising of tobacco products should be banned is a very controversial one.
For det første: Er tobak et giftigt produkt? For det andet: Er reklameforbud at betragte som et indgreb i ytringsfriheden? friheden?
The legal base for prohibiting the advertising of products manufactured from an agricultural product subsidized to the tune of ECU 1.3 billion is equally controversial.
Valverde López sætte spørgsmålstegn ved markedsøkonomien, hun kunne måske rejse til steder, hvor der ikke er markedsøkonomi, og se, hvilke skader tobaksmisbrug har anrettet.
Commissioner Scrivener will devote more attention to that area in the next twelve months.
Parlamentet prædike ikke-rygning i stil med »gør, hvad jeg siger, og ikke, hvad jeg gør«.
the abolition of these subsidies in respect of French tobacco growers — their product being one of the most harmful in the Community.
Mere uddannelse, mere information, bedre eksempler er vejen frem i stedet for udstedelse af forbud mod sociale vaner, hvilket udgør et indgreb i frihedsrettighederne.
Mrs Veil tried to point the finger at the market economy; perhaps she should go and examine the damage caused by tobacco addiction where there is no market economy.
Pollack (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg glæder mig overordentlig meget over Kommissionens forslag efter Parlamentets anmodning for to år siden om lovgivning med henblik på at forbyde tobaksreklamer.
Thirdly, with regard to the regulations being brought in, I think the case has already been made.
Jeg mener, at et flertal af talerne under denne forhandling udførligt, fyldestgørende og ivrigt har vist behovet for at støtte dette forslag.
If we are going to have a Community which respects public health, I have little option but to commend these regulations — which by and large mirror the regulations I brought in in Ireland between 1983 and 1987 and which are almost wholly in operation now — to the House.
Resultatet heraf er, at det er i disse lande, at salget af lette cigaretter er mindst.
The consequence is that it is in those countries that sales of low tar cigarettes are smallest.
Industrierne i de lande, hvor der ikke er monopoler, har gjort en kraftindsats for at bringe lettere tobaksvarer på markedet.
Industries in those countries where there is no monopoly have tried to market lower tar tobacco products.
Et forbud mod reklame, selv produktreklame, — for tobaksproducenterne er rede til at acceptere en afskaffelse af billedreklame, stik imod hvad vor ordfører, der kommer fra et monopolland, vil have os til at tro — er ensbetydende med, at man diskriminerer mod de producenter, der fremstiller de mindst skadelige cigaretter.
To stop them advertising, including product advertising, as they would accept a ban on image advertising, despite what our rapporteur, who comes from a country with a monopoly, would have us believe, would be tantamount to discriminating against producers of the least harmful cigarettes.
London-distriktet Merton, som jeg repræsenterer, har den højeste rygningsrelaterede dødelighedsprocent i regionen.
WYNN (S). — My views on the tobacco industry and on advertising are quite wellknown and documented.
Wandsworth, som jeg også repræsenterer, har den tredje højeste pro cent.
I actually support this report and I support a lot of what the Vernier report is saying.
Den britiske lægeforening siger, at rygning hvert år dræber 106.000 kvinder i Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
However there is a problem which I need to raise and I hope the Commission will take note of this.
Hvad der oprigtigt talt er vildledende, hr. formand, er, at man vil forbyde reklame for andre produkter, der måtte indeholde mærker eller symboler, som er kendt fra tobaksvarer, og dét af den indlysende grund, at man ikke vil true tusinder af arbejdstagere i tobaksindustrien, især kvinder, med arbejdsløshed.
What is frankly absurd, Mr President, is to seek to ban the advertising of other products carrying the trade marks or symbols of tobacco products, for the obvious reason that thousands of workers in the tobacco industry — and women in particular — would otherwise be threatened with unemployment.
Visse industrier forsøger at diversificere deres pro duktion, og at forbyde dem at anvende et givet mærke er i praksis ensbetydende med en ekspropriering af retten til det pågældende mærke.
Some are trying to diversify production, and to prohibit them from using a trade mark would be practically equivalent to expropriating their trade mark right.
Andre lande forbyder rigtignok reklamer for skydevåben.
Other countries do indeed ban the advertising of firearms.
Jeg må sige Dem, at jeg kender en meget stor europæisk våbenvirksomhed, der ligeledes producerer jagt- og sportstøj samt tørklæder, der bærer samme navn som skydevåbnene.
I have to tell you that I know a very large European company which manufactures arms but which also produces hunting and sportswear and scarves which bear the same name as the firearms.
Det falder ingen ind at ...
Noone would ever think of...
Idet industrien er opmærksom på behovet for konstant at hverve tobaksslaver, fordi det lykkes den så godt at gøre det af med 12 af dens kunder i timen, retter tobaksindustrien nu sine reklamer mod børn på 12 år. Dette er skandaløst!
The Commission report talks about direct and indirect advertising. I am still rather confused as to where that leaves sponsorship of certain events, especially sporting events.
Jeg vil gerne beskytte min datter og hendes generation mod at blive forledt af cigaretreklamer. Det skal ganske enkelt standses.
My concern when we talk about sponsorship, certainly of sporting events, is that there are contracts already entered into between tobacco companies and those organizations.
Det glæder mig meget, at vi i dag i Parlamentet har mulighed for at tage de første skridt i denne retning.
That is necessary and I would be grateful if it could be taken into account.
Desmond (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil blot gerne fremsætte tre korte bemærkninger.
DESMOND (S). — Mr President, I would just like to make three brief observations.
For det første går jeg stærkt ind for den gradvise reduktion af den generelle tobaksproduktion i Fællesskabet.
Firstly, I am strongly in favour of the phased reduction in general tobacco production within the Community.
Det er uacceptabelt, at midler fra den fælles land brugspolitik gives til dette område, og jeg har derfor støttet det synspunkt, at der bør være en gradvis reduktion på 10% hvert år.
It is unacceptable that CAP resources should be directed to this area and I have accordingly endorsed the view that there should be a phased 10% reduction each year.
Dette aspekt kræver øjeblikkeligt opmærksomhed fra Kommissionens side, som virkelig må vise meget større mod i sin strategi.
That aspect requires the urgent attention of the Commission, which really must show far greater courage in its approach.
I denne henseende har jeg i de sidste to og et halvt år været en stor beundrer af det arbejde, kommissær Papandreou har udført.
In this regard, I have been a strong admirer for the past two and a half years of the work done by Commissioner Papandreou.
Lulling (PPE). — (FR) Hr. formand, forslaget om at forbyde al direkte og indirekte reklame for tobaksvarer er meget omstridt.
SPENCER (ED). — Mr President, I believe that the passion with which this debate is being conducted makes it impossible for this House rationally to consider the control of advertising in its broader context.
Retsgrundlaget for et forbud mod reklamer for industriprodukter, hvori indgår et landbrugsprodukt, hvortil der ydes en støtte på 1,3 milliarder ECU, er fuldt ud lige så omstridt.
I therefore hope that the House will pass on rapidly from specific consideration of tobacco and advertising and ask the Commission to take a broader look at its whole approach to the regulation of advertising in our Community.
I øvrigt har jeg ikke fra fru Veils side hørt, at hun har anmodet om afskaffelse af denne støtte til de franske producenter, hvis tobak hører til de mest skadelige i Fællesskabet.
Advertising is a desperately important and serious matter, and the issue is not being served by the quality of debate in this House today.
For det andet må vi have en harmonisering på beskatningsområdet.
Secondly, we must have a level playing field on the taxation front.
Jeg har absolut sympati for sammenslutningen af EF's cigaretproducenter.
I have absolute sympathy with the confederation of European Community cigarette manufacturers.
Navnlig i det nordlige Europa er der en total uligevægt, og jeg agter som næstformand for Udvalget om Økonomi, Valutaspørgsmål og Industripolitik at presse på for at få en harmonisering på beskatningsområdet, da det er skandaløst, at der
Particularly in northern Europe there is a total imbalance, and I intend, as vice-chairman of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and Industrial Policy, to press for a level playing field on taxation, because it is outrageous that there should be a perpetuation of the imbalance there, and I hope that
Desmond fortsat skal være en uligevægt der, og jeg håber, at kommissær Scrivener vil skænke dette område meget mere opmærksomhed i det kommende år.
I just hope that those who are worried about hypocrisy in this area will turn to governments and ask them to spend some of their vast tobacco revenue on sending real messages about the dangers of smoking, paid for from their own funds, directly to those who still smoke in this Community of ours. That is the way to reduce smoking.
Jeg har et ændringsforslag herom, som jeg håber kolleger, herunder venner, som har et andet syn på denne betænkning end jeg, vil støtte.
accept any amendments that go against the spirit and the letter of our proposal, and I refer mainly to those that relate to the legal basis.
Der er ikke nogen grund til, at noget objektivt rationelt medlem af Parlamentet taler udførligt om dem, da de er en foranstaltning for folkesundheden og en handling, som berører miljøet.
I consider that the legal issue was settled at that time, at the level of Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs, in favour of Article 100a. The Commission is open-minded about one matter.