natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Men disse arangementer er og har altid været hemmeligholdt af de to parter, og her i Parlamentet, hvor man tidligere har givet udtryk for så megen bekymring for terrorismen, finder jeg det yderst passende, at man fortsat hemmeligholder så danne aftaler, fordi oplysningerne kunne misbruges, hvis de blev offentlig tilgængelige.
But these arrange ments are and always have been confidential between the two parties and in this Parliament where so much concern has been mentioned about terrorism in the past, I think it only right that such agreements should remain confidential because of the effect of the misuse of the information were it to be publicly available.
Turner (ED). — (EN) Kan rådsformanden bekræfte, at den konference, hr. Smith omtalte, er genstand for protokoller indført af medlemsstaterne i rådsforhandlinger, siden Euratom-traktaten blev indgået?
TURNER (ED). — Can the President-in-Office con firm that the conference referred to by Mr Smith is the subject of minutes entered by Member States in Council proceedings since the Euratom Treaty was com menced?
Chalker. — (EN) Jeg tror, jeg har ret, når jeg siger, at dette ikke er et spørgsmål, som jeg bør besvare.
MEGAHY (S). — The President-in-Office's description of the continuance of proceedings is rather at variance with some of the other descriptions that have been given.
Indførelser i forhandlingsreferater angår ikke Ministerrådet og derfor heller ikke dets formand.
Would she agree that this was an accurate statement and if so where would she put the responsibility for such a failure?
Formanden. — Da de følgende spørgsmål vedrører samme emne, vil vi under ét behandle spørgsmål nr. 3 af Megahy (H-480/86):
Would she put it on the shoulders of the British Government which was acting as the President on this occasion?
Kan Det forenede Kongeriges regering derfor, nårsomhelst den ønsker det, undtage atomsprængstoffer som plutonium fra sikkerhedsbestemmelserne i henhold til artikel 14 i den tresidede aftale og anvende det civile nukleare materiale til militære formål?
Would she say that the British Government which has a record of pollution worse than any other country in the Community has now, in this situation of impasse, a special responsibility to make concessions in order to try to reach some agreement?
Og spørgsmål nr. 11 af Morris (H-600/86)('):
Former oral question without debate (0-127/86), con verted into a question for Question Time.
Hun er også klar over, at Parlamentets juridiske rådgivere er enige om, at Det forenede Kongeriges regering og Kommissionen optræder ulovmedholdelig, når de nægter os adgang til dette dokument. Vil den britiske regering nu pålægge Euratom at give os adgang til dette dokument, så vi kan drøfte det og stemme om det her i Parlamentet?
CHALKER — I believe I am right in saying that this would not be a question for me to answer.
en fra først af havde ladet det ledsage af en udtalelse om, hvilken indvirkning det sandsynligvis ville få på omkostningerne for forbrugerne og for erhvervslivet — og jeg forstår, at det er en af de ting, man nu påtænker i forbindelse med Kommissionens udkast til forslag, som det blev meddelt af formanden for Det europæiske Råd her til formiddag?
JACKSON CAROLINE (ED). — Would the Presi dent-in-Office not agree that the large combustion plants directive, which is essentially the subject of these two questions, would have stood a greater chance of success, and would still stand a greater chance of success if the Commission had from the out set included with it a statement of the likely impact that it would have on the costs for consumers and for business — and that I understand is one of the things which is now intended where draft.Commission pro posals are concerned as was mentioned by the Presi dent-in-Office of the European Council this morning?
Chalker, formand for Rådet. — (EN) Jeg vil henvise de ærede medlemmer til det svar, jeg gav fru Tongue under en tidligere mødeperiode.
CHALKER. — Could I say on the last point that the honourable gentleman made that all the discharges from Sellafield, even those made accidentally, were well within the limits.
Den 24.-25. november forelagde formanden Rådet forslag til en aftale.
He in fact asked me a rhetorical question because I had already told him that there was no treaty basis for such a démarche.
Efter en længere drøftelse konkluderede Rådet, at disse forslag indeholder nyttige enkeltheder, men kræver yderligere overvejelser.
In that case it must be up to each and every individual Member State to make such representations as they believe to be necessary. He asked me also about the question of compensation.
Der arbejdes i Rådet videre med sagen med henblik på, at drøftelserne af denne sag kan genoptages snarest.
I am told that Member States have compared notes, but just as this whole issue is a matter for each Member State to consider so is the whole question of com pensation too.
Chalker. — (EN) Det ærede medlem har ganske ret.
CHALKER. — The honourable lady is quite right.
Ifølge den europæiske fælles akt skal alle nye miljø forslag vurderes i forhold til omkostningerne, og det er naturligvis en fornuftig vej frem.
Under the Single European Act all new environmental proposals have to be related to cost and this is obviously a sensible way forward.
Jeg håber, at vi formelt vil vedtage den med virkning fra begyndelsen af januar, når alle medlemsstaterne har ratificeret den europæiske fælles akt, men indtil da er der simpelt hen ingen grund til, at vi ikke i de kommende uger kan arbejde ud fra dette grundlag. Jeg tror, det ville være gavnligt for os alle, hvis vi gjorde det.
It is one which I hope we shall be adopting formally from the beginning of January when all Member States have ratified the Single European Act, but until that time there is simply no reason why one could not proceed in the coming weeks on that sort of basis.
Formanden. — Spørgsmål nr. 4 af Maher (H509/86):
PRESIDENT. — Question No 4 by Mr Mäher (H509/86):
Megahy (S). — (EN) Rådsformandens udtalelse om, at arbejdet fortsætter, strider temmelig stærkt mod andre fremstillinger af denne sag.
CRYER (S). — Could I offer the President-in-Office the useful and practical suggestion that they should ask the Soviet Union to remit the charges they receive for enriching almost 10% of the uranium for the UK's civil nuclear power station programme to be allocated for any compensation needs that arise.
Er hun f.eks. enig i den udtalelse, som den ansvarlige kommissær, hr. Clinton Davis, fremsatte efter det møde, hvor man ikke havde kunnet enes, og hvori han kaldte mødet en fiasko og kritiserede medlemsstaterne, fordi de ikke ville gå på kompromis. Er hun enig i, at denne udtalelse var korrekt, og hvis ja, hvor vil hun så placere ansvaret for en sådan fiasko?
Would the Minister not accept that the fact that the Soviet Union processes this amount of uranium for the United Kingdom is a demonstration of trust in the Soviet Union by that country?
Vil hun mene, at den britiske regering, der er kendt for at forurene mere end noget andet land i Fællesskabet, nu i denne fast låste situation har et særligt ansvar for at gøre ind rømmelser, så man kan nå frem til en aftale?
Would she like to comment on the fact that that same country is spending £ 10 billion on trident nuclear weapons allegedly because of the dangers from a country which the government is demonstrating its complete trust in?
Maher (LDR). — (EN) Jeg takker rådsformanden for svaret, men det er faktisk ikke særlig tilfredsstillende.
CHALKER. — We often hear the honourable Member raise matters, to get him publicity, for which the Council has absolutely no responsibility.
— også inden for Fællesskabet — så må det land, hvor anlægget ligger, yde erstatning til de skadelidte?
CHALKER, President-in-Office of the Council. — The Council is not competent to undertake the kind of démarche the honourable Member suggests.
Er rådsformanden enig i, at dette bør gælde inden for Fællesskabet?
It would therefore be up to the Member States who were so
Chalker. — (EN) Må jeg sige til det ærede medlem, at han sikkert er klar over, at Kommissionen ved det pågældende møde støttede formandskabets kompromis.
VANDEMEULEBROUCKE (ARC). — (NL) I must say, Mrs Chalker, that I am very surprised by your
Jeg har hørt, at medlemsstaterne har udvekslet synspunkter, men alt dette er et spørgsmål, som den enkelte medlemsstat må overveje, og det gælder også hele spørgsmålet om erstatning.
Commission, not the Council, in accordance with Article 155 of the Treaty, to ensure that the provisions of the Treaties and of the implementing acts adopted pursuant thereto are applied.
det forskning sammen med poblemerne i forbindelse med demontering af reaktorer, hvor der virkelig rejser sig et spørgsmål om reaktorsikkerhed.
answers to the second question concerning the monitoring of nuclear energy and to Mr Maher's question.
Det er en helt anden sag, der ikke er dækket af bestemmelserne i Euratomtraktaten.
In reply to the first question you say that everything must be treated in confidence.
Formanden. — Spørgsmål nr. 5 af Avgerinos (H520/86):
This means that you are not yourself prepared to make emergency plans avail able.
Om: Indrejse- og opholdsvisum for spanske, portugisiske og græske studerende
Mr Maher rightly drew a parallel with Sellafield.
I en brevveksling mellem generalsekretæren for Europarådet, OREJA, og den franske repræsentation af 3.10.1986 vedrørende den franske regerings nye bestemmelser om visumtvang blev der givet føldende redegørelse: »... i henhold til de nye direktiver er studerende fra medlemsstaterne, bortset fra spa niere, portugisere og grækere, fra den 2.10.1986 fritaget fra visumtvangen«.
But what I wanted the spokeswoman for the Council to tell me is whether she is struck by the fact that correspondence between the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe, Mr Oreja, and the office of the French representative states clearly that from 2 October 1986 — and it is two months since then and I emphasize that I tabled my question right away at that time — students from all the Member States are exempted from the visa requirement, apart from the Spanish, Portuguese and Greeks.
Er Rådet underrettet om den franske regerings krav, og kan det godtage denne urimelige behandling af statsborgere fra med lemsstater?
CHALKER. — Could I say to the honourable gentleman that when I answered a previous question — not the one to which he referred — I made it quite clear why I believed there was a need for confidential arrangements between the different parties.
Hvad vil Rådet foretage sig for at beskytte de pågældendes interesser?
This is covered under Article 86 of the Euratom Treaty.
Vil hun måske kommentere den kendsgerning, at samme land bruger 10 milliarder £ på Trident-atomvåben, angiveligt på grund af truslen fra et land, som Det forenede Kon geriges regering demonstrerer sin fuldstændige tillid til?
That is quite another matter and is not covered by the arrangements under Article 86 of the Euratom Treaty.
Chalker, formand for Rådet. — (EN) Rådet er ikke blevet orienteret om de af det ærede medlem nævnte forhold.
CHALKER — I have to repeat that the Council has no information on this case, which does properly fall to the Commission.
I øvrigt tilkommer det i henhold til traktatens artikel 155 Kommissionen og ikke Rådet at drage omsorg for gennemførelsen af traktatens bestemmelser og af de retsakter, der følger heraf.
Might I try, helpfully, to suggest to him that he really should put his question to the Commission. I also regret that I am not responsible, as President-in-Office of the Council, for answering for the Council of Europe in these matters.
Chalker. — (EN) Vi hører ofte fra det ærede medlem oom sager, som Rådet overhovedet intet ansvar har for, når han trænger til publicity.
PRESIDENT. — Question No 5 by Mr Avgerinos (H-520/86):
Om et land uden for Fællesskabet har en kontrakt med et andet land inden for det, har overhovedet ingen forbindelse med denne sag og angår ikke formandskabet.
Subject: French entry and residence visas for Spanish, Portuguese and Greek students
Men jeg forventede, at Rådets repræsentant ville svare mig, om hun har bemærket sig, at general sekretæren for Europarådet, hr. Oreja, og den franske repræsentation i en utvetydig skriftlig redegørelse har erklæret, at fra den 2.10.1986 — der er gået to måne der siden da, og jeg gør opmærksom på, at jeg stillede spørgsmålet med det samme — er studerende fra alle medlemsstaterne, bortset fra spaniere, portugisere og grækere, fritaget fra visumtvangen.
In correspondence between the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe, Mr M. Oreja, and the office of the French Representative of 3 October 1986 concerning the recent visa requirements imposed by the French Government, the following clarification was given: '. . . in accordance with new directives, as from 2 October 1986 students from the Member States are exempted from the requirement to obtain a visa, except for the Spanish, Portuguese and Greeks.
Vandemeulebroucke (ARC). — (NL) Jeg må sige Dem, fru Chalker, at Deres svar på det andet spørgsmål om tilsyn med kerneenergi og nu på hr. Mähers spørgsmål forbløffer mig enormt. På det første spørgsmål svarer De, at alt må forblive fortroligt.
ALAVANOS (COM). — (GR) I do not think that Mr Avgerinos was trying with his question to put the Council in the place of the European Court, or that what he wanted from the Council was a reply giving purely and simply the legal angle.
Det er enten det ene eller det andet, men ikke begge dele.
Does the British Presidency agree politically with this?
Chalker. — (EN) Jeg må gentage, at Rådet ikke ligger inde med nogen oplysninger om denne sag, der henhører under Kommissionen.
Is the Council aware of the requirements imposed by the French Government, and does it sanction this practice of affording unfavourable treatment to subjects of Member States?
Det er simpelt hen ikke Rådets sag at udtale sig herom.
What action does it propose to take to protect the interests of those affected?
Som det ærede medlem utvivlsomt ved, henhører spørgsmål om for tolkning af traktaterne under Domstolen og slet ikke under Ministerrådet.
CHALKER. — The way in which the honourable gentleman phrased his question shows clearly that there is a misunderstanding on this matter.
Må jeg have lov at foreslå ham, at han stiller sit spørgsmål til Kommissionen.
The question he is posing to me is really one where the French Government should decide.
Chalker. — (EN) Må jeg sige til det ærede medlem, at da jeg besvarede et tidligere spørgsmål — ikke det, han refererede til — gjorde jeg det helt klart, hvorfor jeg mente, der var behov for, at aftalerne mellem par terne forblev fortrolige. Dette dækkes af Euratomtraktaten.
CHALKER, President-inOffice of the Council. — The Council has not been informed of the facts referred to by the honourable Member.
Chalker, formand for Rådet. — (EN) Jeg vil ikke anfægte deres afgørelse, hr. formand.
CHALKER, President-in-Office of the Council. — I shall not dispute your ruling, Mr President.
Jeg vil besvare alle de spørgsmål, jeg kan ifølge de gældende bestemmelser.
I will answer any question that I possibly can within the Rules.
Men jeg kan kun svare på det, jeg har ansvar for.
However, I can only answer where I have responsibility. ponsibility.
Det er nok bedst, at vi lige ser på, hvad der skete ved det møde af indenrigsministre, der blev indkaldt af Det forene de Kongerige.
would be as well if we just looked at what happened at that Interior Ministers' meeting, which was called by the United Kingdom.
Der blev indkaldt til det møde, for at man kunne overveje, hvorledes man bedst kunne styrke Fællesskabets ydre grænser, så at man kunne tillade friere bevægelse for Fællesskabets borgere in den for Fællesskabet.
That meeting was called to con sider how best to strengthen the Community's external frontiers so as to be able to allow freer movement for Community citizens within the Community.
Mit land, Det forenede Konge rige, har allerede en EF-passage i havne og lufthavne, og jeg håber, vi snart får en yderligere forenkling af ind- og udrejseformaliteterne.
My own country, the United Kingdom, already has an EEC channel at sea and air ports, and I hope we are soon going to have further simplification of embarkation and entry procedures.
Det er alle disse ting, idenrigsministrene diskuterer under dette punkt, der er fastlagt i den europæiske fælles akt.
All these are the matters discussed by the Interior Ministers within this remit, which is laid down in the Single European Act.
Som svar til hr. Cano Pinto kan jeg oplyse, at på et uformelt møde den 22.-23. september 1986 i Edinburgh drøftede arbejds- og socialministrene en med delelse fra den irske, italienske og britiske minister, som indeholdt et handlingsprogram for øget beskæftigelse.
In answer to Mr Cano Pinto, at an informal meeting held in Edinburgh on 22 and 23 September 1986 the Labour and Social Affairs Ministers exchanged views on a communication from the Irish, Italien and United Kingdom Ministers comprising an action programme for increasing employment.
Meddelelsen indeholdt ikke nye forslag, som ville gøre det lettere at foretage afskedigelser, uanset hvad grunden måtte være.
The communication con tained no proposals which would make it easier to dismiss employees for any reason.
Under drøftelserne om beskæftigelsesspørgsmål på samlingen i november kommenterede rådsformanden indgående meddelelsen fra de tre ministre.
The President-in-Office commented at length on the communication from the three ministers during the debate on the employ ment issues at the November partsession.
Han påpegede, at der faktisk er behov for at få arbejdsmarkedet til at fungere bedre, så at det sikres, at det stadig kan efterkomme de krav om fleksibilitet, der stilles til det.
He pointed out that there is, in fact, a need to achieve a better functioning labour market so as to make sure that it can continue to respond to the very flexible demands of the marketplace.
Jeg forstår, at visumkravet kun blev indført af den franske regering som svar på en række terrorhandlinger, som desværre har fundet sted i hovedstaden og i andre byer i år.
I understand that the visa requirement was only introduced by the French Government in response to a number of acts of terrorism which, sadly, the capital and other cities saw during this year.
Det europæiske Råd støttede dette initiativ, fordi formålet med det var at fastslå de principper, der gælder for vor fælles kamp mod terrorismen i Europa, nemlig at der ikke må gives ind rømmelser under tvang, at medlemsstaterne skal være indbyrdes solidariske, og at man skal koordinere sine reaktioner på terrorangreb.
The European Council did endorse that action because it wished to establish the principles governing our common fight in Europe against terrorism, namely, no concessions under duress, solidarity between the Member States and concerted action in response to terrorist attacks.
Det er helt afgjort den fornuftigste måde at forholde sig til denne sag på.
This is surely the sensible way to go about it.
Hvis det ærede medlem nærer nogen tvivl om den franske regerings initiativ, så må jeg gentage, at han må rette sine spørgsmål til denne regering.
If the honourable Member has doubts about the action of the French Government, then, I must repeat, he must address his questions to that government.
Må jeg tilføje, at det ærede medlem tager fejl på flere punkter.
May I add that the honourable Member is mistaken on several counts.
Initiativet blev faktisk taget af den britiske, irske og italienske regering.
The initiative was indeed taken by the British, Irish and Italien Governments.
Det går ud på at skabe nye arbejdspladser og få folk i arbejde igen.
It is about creating new jobs and bringing people back into work.
I den resolution, som Rådet af socialministre skal behandle på torsdag, den 11. december, tages der udtrykkeligt hensyn til, at en strategi for en forbedring af arbejdsmarkedet ikke bør bringe de basale rettigheder med hensyn til social sikkerhed og beskyttelse og arbejdsbetingelser i fare.
The resolution which the Social Affairs Council will be considering on Thursday, 11 December explicitly acknowledges that a strategy to improve the labour market should not put at risk basic rights in the areas of social security, social protection and conditions of work.
Den blev bifaldet af Det europæiske Råd, inklusive den spanske premier premierminister, hr. Gonzales.
It was welcomed by the European Council, including Prime Minister Gonzales of Spain.
Avgerinos (S). — (GR) Til forretningsordenen vedrørende rådsformandens sidste bemærkninger.
CANO PINTO (S). — (ES) It seems to me that in spite of the President-in-Office's optimism, the Labour Ministers' Summit appears to have interpreted the idea of flexibility in the labour market by candidly discuss ing unrestricted dismissal — to put it in plain language. guage.
Hun li gestillede Grækenland, Spanien og Portugal med det, som Frankrig forsøger at bekæmpe for øjeblikket, nemlig terrorisme.
PRESIDENT. — Mrs Chalker, I should like to point out to you that the Member put these questions since, lacking the possibility of directing them to the individual Member States, they can only turn to the Council. cil.
Det kan vi ikke acceptere.
(Applause from the left)
Cano Pinto (S). — (ES) Fru rådsformand, til trods for Deres optimisme forekommer det mig, at den for tolkning, som De har givet af mødet mellem ar bejdsministrene i Skotland om fleksibilitet på ar bejdsmarkedet er, at der simpelt hen oversat til for ståeligt sprog er tale om fri afskedigelse.
It is hard to understand why the policy of job-creation pursued by the Community's Ministers is so much at odds with the report by the OECD — not an organization, by the way, often suspected of revolutionary leanings. This report states, more or less word for word, 'flexibility in the labour market does not contribute in any way to the creation of jobs'.
Chalker. — (EN) Hvad enten det var til forretningsordenen eller ej, må jeg sige, at alle medlemmerne af Det europæiske Råd er gået med til denne foranstaltning.
At the last meeting of Labour Ministers in Scotland, a plan for combating unemployment in the Community, already known as the British plan, was drawn up.
Det er derfor klart, at disse regeringers ministre og det ærede medlem, der stillede spørgsmålet, ikke helt kan have forstået hinanden.
CHALKER — I am alarmed that the honourable gentleman should have perhaps misunderstood the OECD report. The way he phrased his question would seem
Cano Pinto tes bemærket næppe kan anklages for at have revolutionære tilbøjeligheder, hvilket mere eller mindre or dret betyder, at »fleksibilitet på arbejdsmarkedet på ingen måde bidrager til skabelse af arbejdspladser«.
Chalker then they have their own national laws which they should invoke in objecting to such dismissal.
På baggrund af denne fortolkning eller synspunkter om, hvorledes man for øjeblikket kan skabe beskæftigelse ville jeg gerne vide, om Rådet råder over pålideligt statistisk materiale vedrørende en forøgelse af beskæftigelsen i Det europæiske Fællesskab, samtidig med at der sker fri afskedigelse i henhold til den såkaldte » britiske plan «.
When the European Council endorsed them, as I explained in the first answer, it did so in the know ledge that flexibility had been accepted by all partners as playing an important role in the creation of new employment. That is why we have sought throughout the Community, with ideas coming from many differ ent Member States, to achieve coordinated action to develop experimental Community and national pro jects aimed at creating new jobs and business.
Fru formand, jeg tager ikke fejl, det er noget, som er refereret i pressen..
That is why we have been seeking to achieve a new approach, one which is shared and based on the experience of each individual member country.