natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vi foretrækker i stedet en mangesidethed, som har det fortrin, at den lader de samme regler gælde for alle.
We prefer an approach that is multilateral, which has the advantage of the same rules being applied to all.
Sammenlignet med det amerikanske eller andre landes landbrug er de europæiske landbrugeres funk tion ikke blot at producere.
I can see that in negotiations like the Uruguay Round not all sectors will be treated unfavourably.
De bidrager desuden til at afbalancere miljøet, dæmme op for problemer i forbindelse med uligevægt på den fysiske planlægnings område osv. osv.
We should like to know which sectors are going to derive some benefit, so that at the end of the day the burden of adjustment resulting from the Round can be distributed more fairly.
Inden for GATT-forhandlingerne under Uruguay-Runden må vi derfor ikke glemme det styrende princip i Fællesskabets landbrugspolitik, nemlig at
That being so, we also know that the Americans' unilateral approach is based on one provision in particular — the notorious Section 301 of the Trade Bill — which is a force to be reckoned with, since it allows reprisals to be taken against countries with whom the Americans might have differences of opinion.
Men hvilken pris, d'herrer kommissærer, skal man betale for denne ændring i handelssædvanerne?
We also feel that the Community must protect the developing countries by defending their freedom to trade both in terms of prices and the quantities they export.
Svaret fik vi for fire år siden, ved afslutningen af mødet
If we do not do this, the other major parties in the negotiations will also have difficulty in doing so.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
But what price is there to pay for this change in trading practice ?
Dengang håbede USA at ødelægge den fælles landbrugspolitik og især at opnå, at EF's eksportrestitutioner bortfaldt samtidig med fælles skabspræferencen.
At that time, the United States was looking to destroy the CAP and in particular to secure the abolition both of our export refunds and of Community preference.
det nok interessant, men jeg synes, at det er »at betale dyrt« for en operation, der ikke vil indbringe landbrugerne noget, også selv om den faktisk ville betyde en mindre besparelse i udgifterne til den fælles landbrugspolitik.
I believe that in European agriculture, compared with American agriculture, for example, or with that of other countries, farmers are not simply producers of goods. They also help to maintain a balance in the environment, to counter the inappropriate use of land and a good deal more besides.
I dette spil poker har EF vist alle sine kort, mens de andre skjuler deres.
We therefore feel that in the GATT negotiations we must not lose sight of one of the basic principles of our common agricultural policy and defend our aim of maintaining farmers' incomes.
Som modydelse for sænkningen af den direkte støtte fik vi dem til at sluge fire nøgleord, som beskytter os den dag i dag. En gradvis reduktion i — jeg citerer — den direkte støtte og andre foranstaltninger, hvilket direkte sigter til deres deficiency payments.
In return for reducing direct aid, we persuaded them to accept a key phrase which is still protecting us today — the progressive reduction of indirect aids and other measures — aimed directly at their own deficiency payments.
De ønskede også, at landbrugsspørgsmålene blev genstand for en særskilt og hurtig behandling. De gav dog afkald på universaliteten indadtil, da de opgav de smukke formler og især, hvad der lå bag, nemlig fast track eller early harvest, og da de accepterede en afbalanceret behandling af forhandlingens tre dele, nemlig den indre støtte, markedsrettede foranstaltninger og eksportstøtten.
They also wanted the agricultural sector to be dealt with quickly and separately, and thus gave way to the idea of a global approach within the sector, abandoning their catchphrases such as 'fast track' and 'early harvest' and more especially what lay behind them and agreeing to deal in a balanced way with the three aspects of the negotiations, namely internal support, market action and aid for exports.
Mine herrer kommissærer, De må ikke overse den redningskrans, der ligger i de fire nøgleord fra Punta del Este!
Some European negotiators, fearing the wrath of the Americans, wanted Europe to make sacrifices.
Det var forkert af dem.
They were wrong.
Det er de samme, der i dag betegner EF's tilbud på landbrugs området som utilstrækkeligt, mens jeg for min del anser det for at være overdrevet.
The same people are now calling the Community's agricultural offer inadequate, whereas in my view it goes too far.
Dillen (DR). — (NL) Hr. formand, det er ikke min hensigt at kaste mig ud i en romantisk beskrivelse af bondestanden eller at idealisere landbrugerne.
We are no longer in the post-war period when selfsufficiency was the order of the day; this is peacetime, and we need to promote trade between all countries.
Uden at tale nedsættende om noget som helst erhverv vil jeg understrege, at landbrugerne indtager en særlig plads, hvis betydning ikke kan vurderes for højt.
However, this implies the possibility of establishing support measures not so much for production as for the countryside.
Man kan muligvis kritisere anvendelsen af kunstgødning og andre kemiske produkter. Det hindrer ikke, at landmanden altid har været og altid må vedblive at være den sande forsvarer af sin jord og af selve naturen.
We understand that in the context of the GATT negotiations there is broad scope for aid for agriculture, the environment, for less-favoured areas and, if the Commissioner will allow me to say so, for women in the rural world.
Han er den praktiske økolog par excellence, måske ikke fuld kommen — hvem er det? — men dog økolog i praksis.
In other words, there is ample opportunity for establishing measures which effectively constitute a step in the same direction.
Deraf burde følge, at medlemsstaterne hver for sig og Fællesskabet som helhed tillagde det høj prioritet at varetage landbrugernes interesser. Desværre måtte jeg to gange i den sætning bruge konditionalis.
But we believe that there are still significant bureau cratic obstacles — and I take Spain as an example — which prevent farmers from having ready access to the programmes of the structural funds, and here the solution is in our own hands.
Det bidrog De i høj grad til, kommissær Andriessen, men i dag spørger jeg Dem, som jeg spurgte hr. McSharry.
You played a large part in it, Mr Andriessen, but I ask you now like Mr McSharry: what have you done with that success?
Hvad har De brugt denne succes til? Hvordan har De tænkt Dem at bevare fællesskabs præferencen og dennes uløseligt forbundne mekanisme, den variable afgift, som De allerede har accepteret bliver neutraliseret derved, at den i det væsentlige underlægges tarif-fastsættelse? Hvordan kan De tvinge USA til at reducere deres deficiency payments?
How are you going to maintain Community preference and its unrivalled mechanism, the variable levy, when you have already agreed to deprive it of its effect by essentially making it subject to a system of tariffs ?
Hvorfor har De, i en gådefuld tekst, givet USA et signal, der varsler, at De, når USA beder om det, vil give en større indrømmelse på den del, der hedder »nedsættelse af eksportstøtten«.
Why, in an ominous text, did you give the United States a signal which opens the door for further concessions, at their request, on reducing aid for exports?
Hvorfor går De i den fælde, der hedder de-coupling, som bygger på en skelnen mellem det såkaldte sociale landbrug og det konkurrerende landbrug? Derved opnår De, at det første lige kan hutle sig igennem, og De giver USA lov til at tage livet af det andet.
Why are you falling into the trap of decoupling, accepting a distinction between what are called 'social' and 'competitive' agriculture, which will barely let you keep the first alive and enable the United States to kill off the second ?
Vi går ind for støtte, men ikke for socialhjælp.
We are in favour of aid, but not of social aid.
Det er den slags støtte og ikke socialhjælp, landbrugerne vil have.
We are in favour of economic aid, of the kind we have developed under the policy of aid for hill farming.
Står det bedre til med EF's holdning til landbruget?
It is this aid that farmers want, not social aid.
Hvad angår rebalancing, der skulle give mulighed for at opkræve afgifter af et bestemt antal importerede produkter, som der i øjeblikket ikke opkræves afgifter for, så finder jeg
Finally, as other Members have done, I would like to echo the voices of our farmers who have told us through their trade unions that they see the future following the GATT negotiations as uncertain.
Det drejer sig om at redde det europæiske landbrug, de europæiske folks landbrug.
Their forecasts are clearly pessimistic.
Det er sidste udkald. Også her kan vi med stolthed sige, at højrepartierne
I believe it is up to the Commission and every single Member of this House to ensure that these pessimistic forecasts do not become a reality, and that in doing so they restore the social balance in favour of the countryside, in a way which has not been possible for decades.
Dillen og nationalisterne i Europa altid har forsvaret land bruget. Det bliver vi ved med.
GUILLAUME was done. Here too we can say with pride that nationalists and the Right in Europe have always defended farmers and will continue to do so.
For det første er der den ændring, der sigter på at bevare fællesskabspræference. Efter min mening er det et vigtigt punkt.
Finally, can you tell me why you have proposed a reduction in support of 30% when we know that the US Congress will not accepta cut of more than 20% in their aid, even if the government does announce an offer of 75% ?
Det må hindres, at EF-tarifika-tionen fører til, at produkter, der kan underminere interventionssystemet, udefra kan komme ind på EF-markedet.
As for rebalancing, which would enable duties to be levied on a number of imported products for which none currently exist, I think it is certainly of some interest, but that a high price is being paid for an operation that will produce no return for farmers, even if it would enable small savings to be made in the Community's agricultural spending.
Wurtz (CG). — (FR) Hr. formand, efter at have demonstreret den 13. november i Genève vil mange tusinde landbrugere på ny demonstrere den 29. november over hele Frankrig og den 3. december i Bruxelles for at lægge pres på GATT-forhandlerne og tage afstand fra EF's stillingtagen i landbrugssektoren. toren.
WURTZ (CG). — (FR) Mr President, following the demonstrations in Geneva on 13 November, tens of thousands of farmers will demonstrate once again throughout France on 29 November and in Brussels on 3 December to put pressure on the GATT negotiators and to speak out against the Community's position in the agricultural sector.
For det andet er der importbegrænsningerne vedrørende kornsubstitutter til kvægfoder. Dem jubler man ikke så lidt over inden for kornsektoren.
In this game of poker, the Community has shown all its cards while the other players are keeping theirs close to their chest.
Men betyder strukturel støtte på den anden side ikke, at situationen i mindre begunstigede områder ensidigt låses fast?
The Commission must not neglect the life-raft provided by that key phrase from Punta del Este!
Ved at fastsætte en nedgang på 30% i landbrugs støtten fra 1986 til 1996 lader Rådets enstemmige beslutning en alvorlig trussel hænge over familiebedrifterne, der allerede er ude i en vanskelig situation.
The Council's unanimous agreement on a 30% cut in aids to agriculture over the period 1986 to 1996 poses a serious threat to family farms, which are already in a difficult situation.
Afviklingen af fællesskabspræferencen fremskyndes, og ved at smadre restitutionsordningen accepterer Fællesskabet frivilligt at afstå dele af verdensmarkedet til de amerikanske eksportører.
We are moving faster towards the dismantling of Community preference, and by scrap ping the system of refunds, the Community is agreeing voluntarily to give up parts of the world market to American exporters.
Denne kapitulation er stadig ikke tilstrækkelig for USA, som, styrket af denne første fordel, kræver endnu flere.
This surrender is still not enough for the United States, which having gained one advantage is now seeking even more.
Og desværre vinder de gehør i denne forsamling, selv om det ikke rigtig viser sig i debatten.
And unfortunately they are finding some response in this House, even if it doesn't really show in the debate.
Dette er grunden til, at vi har måttet sige nej til de kristelige demokraters og socialisternes kompromis, som ikke blot accepterer EF's tilbud, men gør det til grundlaget for forhandlinger, der skal bane vejen for nye indrømmelser.
We have therefore had to withhold our signature and our support from the compromise text drawn up by the Socialist and Christian Democratic Groups, who are not only endorsing the Community's offer, but are making it a negotiating stance that paves the way for more concessions.
Til slut, en afbalanceret verdenshandel er af stor betydning. I en tid med skiftende konjunkturer vil vi komme til at betale en høj pris, hvis GATT-Runden mislykkes.
Nevertheless, the importance of the farming community must not be underestimated.
Thareau (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, d'herrer kom missærer, for tre uger siden sagde Kommissionens repræsentant til Landbrugsudvalget, at GATT-forhandlingerne hverken var improviserede eller ukendte.
There may be grounds for criticizing the use of artificial fertilizers or other chemical products.
Men samtidig er de meget bindende for Kommissionen, for når alt det er kendt og finder sted inden for tidsfristerne, så må der også være nogle svar.
They put ecology into practice in an admirable way, perhaps not as perfect ecologists, but then noone anywhere is that.
Vi vil gøre det stik modsatte af, hvad der er selv mord for vore landmænd, og kræve, at Uruguay-Runden munder ud i en ny ligevægt på verdensmarkedet, som skal hvile på et retfærdigt grundlag, og som i højere grad skal varetage udviklingslandenes interesser.
It should therefore follow that the promotion of farmers' interests should be a top priority for the Community countries, both individually and for the European Community as a whole.
Vi kræver, at familiebedrifternes interesser forsvares urokkeligt under GATT-forhandlingerne.
Unfortunately, I have had to use the conditional tense twice.
Dette skal ske for at tilskynde til de former for landbrugsmæssig produk tion, der tager hensyn til miljøet, og for at medvirke til, at vi kan beholde landbrugerne og få en harmonisk fysisk planlægning.
When I think how some Flemish farmers were devastated by swine fever recently, I can only say that the Belgian Government has failed them miserably.
Vi er verdens største importør, dem, der importerer mest i verden, men vi kunne godt begrænse vores import. Hvor blev jeg dog glad, da jeg for lidt siden hørte kommissær McSharry sige, at vi ikke kunne forøge vor import.
Taking the opposite view to this suicidal approach for our agriculture, we want to see the Uruguay Round result in a fair balance being restored to the world market, taking better account of the interests of the developing countries.
Det udsagn er jeg helt enig i. Skal vi også sige, hvad vi vil på andre punkter?
We insist that the interests of family farms should be strongly defended in the GATT negotiations.
Endnu er intet afgjort, og det værste kan stadig undgås, takket være landbrugernes og deres organisationers aktioner. Vi støtter dem.
The die is not yet cast, and the worst can still be avoided thanks to the action taken by farmers and their organizations.
Jeg vil gerne fremhæve tre betænkeligheder.
Is the European Community's attitude towards agriculture any better?
For det første er der rejst tvivl om landbrugsstøtten.
European unity is inadequate in more than one respect, indeed worse than that, misconceived and a failure.
Vi er enige, men i hvilket omfang, sammenlignet med hvad?
If there is one area in which Europe's shortcomings, Europe's failure must severely criticized, it is agriculture.
Vi konstaterer, at de rige lande faktisk praktiserer dumping, men vi fremhæver aldrig, at der fore går udbytning i de fattige lande.
Farmers have been and are still frequently being treated as pariahs, and their interests subordinated to those of non-Europeans in an intolerable way.
Jeg hentyder her til den sociale dumping.
I say this without affront to the Americans.
Van der Waal (NI). — (NL) Hr. formand, spørgsmålet, om EF-landbrugskompromiset er en »sejr for fællesskabsidéen«, som den italienske land brugsminister har sagt, kan vi lade ligge.
VAN DER WAAL (NI). — (NL) Mr President, we should not dwell on the question of whether the Community's compromise on agriculture can be described as a 'victory for the spirit of the Community', as the Italian Agriculture Minister put it.
Det er i hvert fald positivt, at en EF-aftale er kommet i stand.
It is in any event a good thing that a Community agreement has been reached.
Jeg skal herefter gøre tre bemærkninger om forskellene i forhold til Kommissionens oprindelige tekst.
I should just like to make three comments on the differences in relation to the original text from the Commission.
Hvad mening har tanken om frihandel, når alle kræver undtagelser?
Firstly, the change which is intended to safeguard Community preference, an important matter in my view.
Japan gør det for ris, Thailand for maniok, Brasilien for soyabønner, Uruguay for kød osv. Hykleriet bliver endnu mere udtalt, når det lykkes USA at spænde udviklingslandene for sin vogn, skønt de har helt modsatrettede interesser i de globale GATT-forhandlinger.
We need to guard against products which undermine the system of intervention being allowed onto the Community market from outside as a result of the introduction of tariff equivalents.
Og hvorfor ikke? Men så må man have kontrol med mængderne.
But then we have to get quantities under control.
Er alle her parate til at forpligte sig til det?
Is everyone here committed to doing that ?
Vil de andre lande forpligte sig til det?
Are other countries committed to doing that ?
Det er det fundamentale spørgsmål.
That's the fundamental question.
Og hvad nu hvis vi, sådan som jeg mener at have forstået det, i de 30 % indbefatter samtlige former for produktstøtte: støtte til ammekøer, støtte til moderfår etc... hvad er der så tilbage af den fælles landbrugspolitik?
And then if we include in this 30%, as I think we do, all the product aids — aid for suckler cows, aid for ewes, and so on — what is there left of the agricultural policy?
Anden betænkelighed. Alle kender de internationale kampe om miljø og sundhed.
My second concern : everyone knows about the international campaigns for health and the environment.
Et underudvalg?
A subcommittee ?
Javel, hr. kommissær, det kommer naturligvis igen i konklusionerne.
Yes indeed, Commissioner, that will be part of the conclusions.
Jeg er dog bange for, at det ikke er tilstrækkeligt, for vi ved, at konsekvenserne for sundheden, og konsekvenserne af de internationale konflikter, er permanente: hormoner, væksthormoner, for ikke at tale om, hvad fremtiden byder på!
I'm afraid that won't be enough, however, since we know that the consequences for health, and also in terms of inter national disputes, are lasting ones indeed : hormones, somatotropins, let alone what the future has in store !
Hvordan kan det være, at EF har ladet sig bringe i den situation?
Secondly, the import restrictions on cereal substitutes for use as animal feed.
Havde vi da ikke et godt budskab?
These have generally been welcomed by the cereal sector.
Hvorfor når dette budskab, der i virkeligheden også er en søgen efter bedre balance mellem udbud og efterspørgsel, ikke frem?
Without such measures, cuts in cereal subsidies would certainly be more difficult to put into effect.
Både Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne har på dette punkt præsteret for lidt. Under mine besøg i tredje lande har jeg kunnet konstatere, at EF's standpunkter ikke forklares, endsige forsvares, hverken af Kommissionen, Rådet eller Parlamentet.
But do the cereal farmers really have grounds for optimism ?
Kommis sionens repræsentanter er snarere tilbøjelige til at tale deres samtalepartneres sprog.
How, under the GATT rules, are these import restrictions going to be offset ?
På den måde får vi ikke vort budskab frem.
Is there some other way than by lowering cereal prices still further?
Tredje betænkelighed, foranstaltningerne for at opretholde indkomsten i EF.
The third concern is the measures to maintain incomes in the Community.
Bevares, men hvilke foranstaltninger, hvor meget må de koste på budget tet?
Fine, but what measures and at what cost to the budget ?
Her ved vi, at sikkerhedsmargenen i vores budget ikke vil tillade os at dække behovene, det gælder både dem, der skyldes den fælles landbrugs politik, og dem, der skyldes DDR's optagelse for uden dem, der skyldes konsekvenserne af GATT.
We know that the safety margin in our budget will not enable the needs to be met, neither those under the present agricultural policy nor those resulting from the arrival of the GDR or the effects of GATT.
Vi venter utålmodigt på en ny-justering af budgetoverslagene. slagene.
We are waiting with some impatience for a revision of the budget estimates.
Vores gruppe ønsker således, at der ikke bliver nogen afstemning i dag om noget, der rummer for mange ubekendte.
Let us by all means give our backing to social measures designed to help farmers as part of the restructuring of Community agriculture.
Vi foretrækker at vise Kommis sionen tillid ved at stille krav til den.
But with the support measures proposed by the Commission, do we not run the risk of finding ourselves in a position where structural support gets in the way of restructuring ?
Hvis vi imidlertid skal stemme, vil vi forsøge at stemme, samtidig med at vi indarbejder de præcisioner, jeg netop har omtalt.
On the other hand, however, surely the position in less-favoured areas is being maintained in a one-sided way by structural support?
Derfor opfordrer jeg udtrykkeligt hr. Andriessen til at instruere og overbevise sine repræsentanter i andre lande bedre.
Our group therefore does not wish to vote today on things which are still unknown quantities and would rather place its trust in the Commission, while making its demands clear to the latter.
Vil det sige, at landbruget i alle tilfælde skal betale gildet?
At a time of economic downturn, we should have a high price to pay for a breakdown in the GATT negotiations.
FORSÆDE: SIEBERT ALBER Næstformand
IN THE CHAIR: MR ALBER
Simone Martin (LDR). — (FR) Ingen kan i dag bestride den indvirkning, GATT-aftalerne får på den fælles landbrugspolitik og derigennem på europæiske landbrugeres indkomst og fremtid.
THAREAU (S). — (FR) Mr President, threee weeks ago, the Commission representative told the Committee on Agriculture that the GATT negotiations were neither impromptu nor an unknown quantity.
Disse landbrugere er i dag ude i en krise uden fortilfælde.
Do we also need to spell out what we want on other points ?
Marck (PPE). — Hr. formand, hr. Bocklet har redegjort for vor gruppes standpunkt, så jeg vil i mit indlæg navnlig koncentrere mig om det budskab, som EF sender til verden under GATT-forhandlingerne.
MARCK (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, my colleague Mr Bocklet has already set out the position of our group, and so I should like to concentrate in my speech on the message which the EC is giving to the world in the GATT negotiations.
USA's budskab lyder på absolut frihandel. Det har de gjort til et slagord, og det er lykkedes dem at vinde hele verden, også udviklingslandene, for dette slagord.
The message from the United States is total free trade.
Men slagordet svarer ikke til virkeligheden.
In fact, it doesn't hold water.
USA har et af de stærkest beskyttede landbrugsmarkeder, og det bedrer sig ikke.
The United States has one of the most strongly protected markets in agriculture, and things are not getting any better.
Hver gang importen har succes, står lobbyerne klar til at lukke døren.
When imports are successful, the lobbies are always there to have the door shut.