natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg anmoder Dem, hr. kommissær, om for fremtiden ikke at forelægge Parlamentet den slags.
What the Commission is proposing is not utopian.
Jeg håber, det bliver forkastet. Jeg er i hvert fald sikker på, at medlemsregeringerne vil forkaste dette tåbelige for slag, hvilket til en vis grad er en lettelse for os.
Our thinking is based on analysis of actual cases.
Med lemsregeringerne og Rådet skal absolut ikke være re parationsværksted for tåbelige ting, som foreslås af Kommissionen og vedtages i Parlamentet.
It has proved very largely successful there. In other Member States, local experiments making intensive use of energy auditing have stimulated investment on a considerable scale.
Mosar, medlem af Kommissionen. — (FR) Hr. for mand, lad mig først takke ordføreren, hr. Andrews, for det kvalitetsarbejde han har udført på vegne af Udvalget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og For brugerbeskyttelse.
MOSAR, Member of the Commission. — (FR) Mr President, let me first of all thank the rapporteur, Mr Andrews, for the excellent report he has produced on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection.
Maher (LDR). - (EN) Hr. formand, som hr. An drews understregede i sin betænkning, er energiforbruget ret højt, hvad angår opvarmning af huse, navnlig i Nordeuropa, og stiller meget store krav til energianvendelsen.
Let me now comment briefly on the amendments tabled by Mr Andrews.
Det er derfor et område, som vi ikke har råd til at lade upåagtet.
I can say that the Commission would be prepared to take account of a majority of the amendments tabled.
For øjeblikket er energiudgifterne ikke så store, som de var for 67 år siden; men der er ingen grund til at tro, at de vil forblive så lave, som de nu er.
Only one, Amendment No 1, tabled by Mr Seligman, would cause us problems, whereas we would have been able to accept Amend ment No 3, now withdrawn.
De vil uundgåeligt stige igen.
The Commission's position is that these energy audits must necessarily be compulsory.
Vi ved aldrig, hvornår der kommer en ny oliekrise.
I therefore invite Parliament to adopt the report by Mr Andrews, whom I thank for his support.
Vi kan derfor forsvare at undersøge dette område for at se, i hvilket omfang vi på europæisk plan kan påvirke de nationale myndigheder til at tage de nødvendige skridt til at fremme større energibesparelser. sparelser.
With your leave, Mr President, I now wish to return, as promised, to the comments expressed earlier on rather forcefully, not to say vehemently, by the honourable Member Mr Wedekind, who invited the House to decline our proposals.
Er det ikke rimeligt, at en køber eller lejer af en byg ning får korrekte oplysninger om, hvor stort et energiforbrug, der kan forventes, som det f. eks. er tilfældet med biler?
Is it right that every prospective buyer or tenant of a building should be entitled to receive proper information on the level of energy consumption he can expect, just as when buying a car, for instance.
Disse oplysninger har vi tænkt os dels i form af en energisynsrapport. der angiver, hvilke forbedringer, der skal foretages, samt rentabiliteten af alle disse forbedringer.
We see this information being provided in two ways. First, by means of an energy audit defining improvements to be made and indicating the cost-effectiveness of each such improvement.
Dels i form af en angivelse af energiforbruget, der gør det muligt at vurdere brugsomkostningerne ved en bygning.
Secondly, by means of a statement of energy consumption, to provide a basis for estimating the cost of using a building.
Set fra køberens synspunkt forekommer fordelene ved sådanne oplysninger indlysende.
From a buyer's view point, the advantages of receiving this information are self-evident, it seems to me.
Det er næsten altid ved salg af fast ejendom, at der foretages ændringer af bygningen, og det er således på det tidspunkt, at investeringerne skal orienteres i energiøkonomisk retning.
It is almost invariably when a building changes hands that work is under taken on it, so that it is at this stage that guidance is needed for decisions on energy-saving investments.
Fra lejerens synspunkt udgør energiregningen normalt en stor del af nettolejen, og den sunde fornuft siger mig, at det er nødvendigt at stille de relevante oplysninger til rådighed, hvis notet sådant er muligt.
From a tenant's standpoint, energy costs generally represent a considerable proportion of net rent, and it is only common sense, in my opinion, that he should be provided with proper information if possible.
Jeg ved, at man har fremført det argument, at dette ikke bør være et anliggende for de europæiske institutioner.
From the viewpoint of the vendor or landlord, many have spent considerable sums on improving the energy efficiency of their buildings.
Mosar man bedre honorere en sådan indsats end ved at give oplysninger om bygningens gode energiøkonomiske stand?
Mosar interesting and needed to be answered at greater length.
Lad os ikke glemme, at der udelukkende er tale om at give en hensigtsmæssig oplysning.
Please accept my apologies.
Selvfølgelig kunne det ikke på nogen måde falde mig ind at sætte spørgsmålstegn ved hr. Wedekinds ret til at kritisere vores forslag og udtrykke sin personlige opfattelse af sagen. I øvrigt vil jeg overlade det til den høje forsamling at vurdere, hvorvidt den kritik og de bekymringer, han har ment at burde give udtryk for, er overdrevet eller i hvert fald lettere forivret.
his personal views on it. At the same time, though, I acknowledge the right of this House, in its wisdom, to judge to what extent the criticisms and concerns he saw fit to express just now were exaggerated, or at least coloured by a hint of overzealousness.
Jeg konstaterer i øvrigt, at vores forslag imødekommer mange ønsker og forslag, som der er givet udtryk for ved tidligere lejligheder, hvor jeg har haft den ære at intervenere.
I would point out, incidentally, that our proposal has been made in response to many concerns and many wishes and suggestions expressed in the past, on which it has been my privilege to address the House on previous occasions.
Det er ikke mine ord, det er hr. Wedekinds.
If 50 are in favour there are 50 who are against.
Det skal jeg sige et par ord om.
I am not sure about your facts.
Spørgsmålet er stil let mig gentagne gange.
However, I am quite sure it was not a point of order.
Vi er overbeviste om, at kun en systematisk informering af de potentielle købere eller lejere er i stand til massivt at stimulere energiøkonomiske investeringer.
It was a point you succeeded in making but before asking the Commissioner to respond, Mr Andrews, the rapporteur, has asked to be allowed to make a brief comment.
I den sammenhæng skal jeg understrege, at bygningssektoren tegner sig for ca. 40% af Fællesskabets samlede energiforbrug, og at den rummer de største energibesparelsesmuligheder, og i betragtning heraf skal jeg med Deres tilladelse, hr. Wedekind, vende tilbage til Deres bemærkninger.
ANDREWS (RDE), rapporteur. — Mr President, regarding the 50%; Mr Sherlock's opposition was similar at the Environment Committee where there were 15 votes for and 9 against.
Men først må jeg have mulighed for at fremsætte vore synspunkter, der i øvrigt også er et svar på Deres spørgsmål.
So, there were more than 50% in favour at the Environment Committee and I am confident that those who have an interest and have looked at this report will give us their support when we get around to voting on it.
Jeg skal gentage, at vi er overbeviste om, at systematisk informering af mulige købere og lejere effektivt vil kunne stimulere energiøkonomiske investeringer.
In view of the limited time available to me, I propose to confine myself to just two of the points made by Mr Wedekind, on which he put particular emphasis.
Med hensyn til denne bekymring kan jeg henvise til analyser, udarbejdet af Kommissionens tjenestegrene, navnlig på de steder, hvor energisyn allerede er obligatorisk.
He asked whether this proposal, or the measures taken to implement it, would not result in extra bureaucratic costs that would be wasteful, not to say intolerable.
Den informationsprocedure, som er inde holdt i direktivet, medfører i realiteten ikke nogen nævneværdig vækst i bureaukratiet, da der udelukkende er tale om en oplysningspligt.
Those are not my words, they are the words used just now by Mr Wedekind. In answering this point, I take account of the analyses made by the Commission's staff, most significantly in those countries where the energy audit is already compulsory.
En sådan med fører ikke nogen forpligtelse til at lade de nødvendige arbejder udføre.
The information procedure called for in the directive does not entail any significant increase in bureaucracy, since the obligation imposed is confined to providing information and does not extend to any duty to carry out work found necessary.
Med hensyn til ekstraudgifter skal vi minde om, at f. eks. ved salg af et enfamiliehus drejer det sig måske om mellem 100 og 200 ECU alt efter, hvor grundigt energisynet har været.
As to the additional costs, may I remind you that in the case of the sale of a private house, for instance, the amount involved would be perhaps some 100 to 200 ECU, depending on how sophisticated the audit was.
Et sådant beløb forekommer mig meget lille i forhold til de normale omkostninger ved et salg.
That strikes me as a very small amount when set against the customary costs of such a transaction.
Kommissionens forslag er ikke en utopi.
Secondly, Mr Wedekind expressed concern about the differences between countries.
Vore over vejelser er baseret på analyse af konkrete tilfælde.
He maintained that our proposal was of no interest to certain countries, such as those in the southern parts of the Community.
En sidste bemærkning til hr. Wedekinds indsigelse vedrørende de eksisterende forskelle mellem med lemslandene.
I always find that when Mr Wedekind is for something most people go the other way.
Hermed ønsker han at sætte spørgsmål stegn ved, hvorvidt vore forslag er af interesse for visse lande, f. eks. de sydlige lande i Fællesskabet.
I hope this will happen in this particular case. He was equally vociferous in the Environment Committee.
Jeg skal kort kommentere hr. Andrews' ændringsforslag.
He lost his case and he is still just as angry as we heard today.
Kommissionen kan acceptere de fleste af de stil lede ændringsforslag.
I regret that very much. This directive will particularly benefit the people.
Kun et af disse, nr. 1. som er stillet af hr. Seligman, er problematisk for os i mod sætning til ændringsforslag nr. 3, som er blevet trukket tilbage, men som vi ville have kunnet acceptere. re.
It is nothing to do with the building industry. We heard Mr Delors talk today about a people's Europe.
Efter Kommissionens opfattelse kan energisyn kun være obligatorisk.
We heard the Commission talk about a people's Europe. And this is what this is all about.
Hr. formand, jeg personligt er helt overbevist om, at en forkastelse af direktivformen og en ændring af det til en henstilling kraftigt ville svække betydningen af vores initiativ.
This is a people's directive and its aim is to prod the governments to look after the interests and health and wellbeing of the people. That is the purpose of this directive.
Derfor opfordrer jeg Parlamentet til at vedtage hr. Andrews' betænkning, og jeg takker i øvrigt for hans støtte.
I would suggest that those who are opposing it have been lobbied very hard with a view to having it rejected.
En enkelt bemærkning hertil : I Fællesskabets sydlige lande findes der allerede bestemmelser, der fastsætter et energiøkonomisk minimumsniveau for nye byg ningers vedkommende.
Allow me to comment on this. As I understand it, regulations defining minimum standards of energy efficiency in new buildings are already in force in southern Member States of the Community.
I Portugal er der ganske vist kun tale om et foreløbigt udkast til en sådan ordning; men jeg udleder i hvert fald heraf, at bygningers energiøkonomi er et problem, som alle medlemsstater uden undtagelse interesserer sig for.
I am aware that such provisions are only at the preliminary draft stage as yet in Portugal, but I find it only logical to conclude that the energy efficiency of buildings is a matter of concern to all Member States, without exception.
Undtaget herfra er nogle få geografiske områder med usædvanligt mildt klima. I sådanne områder medfører en højnelse af levestandarden dog, at opvarmning af opholdsrum finder sted, omend kun i nogle få uger af året.
I grant that this does not apply in a very limited number of geographical areas where the climate is particularly mild, but even there, with rising living standards, more and more premises are being heated, if only for a few weeks in the year.
Når dette er sagt, skal det understreges, at vi ikke har til hensigt at indføre overdreven centralstyring, og vores forslag til direktiv åbner da også mulighed for at fast sætte særlige undtagelsesbestemmelser, navnlig ud fra klimatiske forhold, hvis nøjagtige indhold overlades til de berørte medlemsstaters skøn.
That said, we have not sought and do not intend to impose excessively rigid rules, and in fact the directive, as pro posed, makes provision for specific exclusions, based on climate in particular, the exact content of which is left to the discretion of the Member States concerned.
For vi må ikke glemme, at det vi tilsigter er at fastsætte en ramme.
Please remember that it is a framework that we are trying to establish.
Jeg skal nu som lovet vende tilbage til de måske lidt voldsomme bemærkninger, som det ærede medlem, hr. Wedekind, for lidt siden fremsatte, hvori han opfordrede Parlamentet til ikke at følge vore for slag.
I could supply you with the results of a survey carried out in Denmark which shows figures in excess of 50%. In fact I think I am right in saying that almost 70% of the population comply with the decisions, the provisions introduced.
Afstemningen finder sted i morgen kl. 18.30.
petroleum and coal, all materials which are combustible and contain energy.
A2-4/88) af Lentz-Cornette for Ud valget om Miljø- og Sundhedsanliggender og Forbrugerbeskyttelse om en politik vedrørende plastaffald.
A 2-4/88) by Mrs Lentz-Cornette, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, on a policy on domestic waste plastics.
Sherlock (ED). — (EN) Til Forretningsordenen, hr. formand: På trods af risikoen for at fremkalde endnu et udbrud af snakkesalighcd fra Kommissionens side forestiller Kommissionen sig da at et forslag til direktiv vil blive støttet, når en gennemførelsesgrad på kun 50% i en af vore nordligste medlemsstater af ham anses for tilfredsstillende?
The rising living standards that accompanied Western Europe's rapid economic development resulted in a literally gigantic increase in the volume of domestic waste, with which, strangely enough, the municipalities today have to cope almost on their own. Industry creates new products and looks for new outlets.
Der er kun en gennemførelsesgrad på 50%.
That, in the past, was where their problems ended.
Hvis 50 er for, er der 50, som er imod.
But the municipalities are almost always responsible.
Lentz-Cornette (PPE), ordforer. — (DE) Hr. formand, en lærer spurgte i sin klasse om en definition på arkæologi. En elev svarede, at det var læren om gammelt affald.
Today it can be said: 'Show me your dustbin, and I will tell you how you live.'
Om alderen af det gamle affald har allerede mange lærde været uenige og er det stadig, når de skal tidfæste de enkelte arkæologiske lag.
Wc must counteract this tendency to create more and more waste throughout Europe, beginning with the requirement that waste be avoided, that materials be recycled and that energy be used.
Formanden. — Deres regnestykke er rigtigt, hr. Sherlock.
LENTZ-CORNETTE (PPE), rapporteur. — (DE) Mr President, a teacher once asked his class for a definition of archaeology.
Jeg er ikke sikker på Deres fakta. Jeg er imidlertid helt sikker på, at det ikke var til Forretningsordenen.
One of his pupils answered that it was the study of old waste.
Det var en bemærkning, som det lykkedes Dem at fremsætte; men inden jeg beder kommissæren om at svare, har hr. Andrews, ordføreren, bedt om at få lov til at fremsætte en kort bemærkning.
We cannot and will not go into our demands in detail here once again: they are listed in paragraphs 1 to 9 of our resolution and refer to a uniform, coherent medium- and long-term strategy for a European waste disposal policy, which should above all include practicable options for recycling materials and re-utilizing energy.
Men om vor epoke, om kunststofepoken, vil der aldrig opstå uenighed.
But there will never be any arguments about our age, the age of plastic.
Tilstedeværelsen af kunststof fer i vort affald sætter massivt ind i 1950'crnc.
The proportion of plastics in our waste began to grow very rapidly in the 1950s.
Da det første kunststof, celluloid, blev opfundet i 1888 og der dernæst blev fremstillet billiardkugler deraf, som tidligere havde været af elefanttand, altså af elfenben, kunne ingen vide, at der dermed årligt ville blive spa ret 12 000 elefanters liv, og at der i vor tid skulle følge yderligere over 60 kunststoffer efter.
When the first plastic, celluloid, was invented in 1888 and billiard balls were then made of it, instead of elephants' tusks, ivory in other words, no one could fore see that this would save the lives of 12 000 elephants a year and that more than 60 other plastics would follow in our times.
Andrews (RDE), ordforer. — (EN) Hr. formand, med hensyn til de 50%; Hr. Sherlocks modstand var den samme i Miljøudvalget, hvor der var 15 stemmer for og 9 imod.
Some governments are planning specific regulations on packaging, others are calling for the recycling of materials, yet others are concentrating on the utilization of the energy they contain.
Der var således mere end 50% for i Miljøudvalget, og jeg er overbevist om, at de, der har en interesse og har set på denne betænkning, vil give os deres støtte, når vi skal stemme om den.
Unfortunately, there are still no generally recognized and valid criteria that make it possible to find the most suitable solution to the benefit of society, and in this context we particularly welcome the study submitted by the Commission on the recycling of waste plastics.
Et blik på tingene her i mødesalen viser os. hvor mange anvendelsesmuligheder der er for kunststoffer, fra tæppebelægningen over stolenes polstring til skumgummiet i stolen, kamerahusene, telefonapparaterne, tv-skærmene og de kunstige hofteled, tænder eller hår, nogle af os har. eller de forskellige stoffer i bilerne, f. eks. rattet eller interiøret.
A glance at the objects here in the Chamber shows how many possible applications there are for plastics, starting with our carpets through the filling of our chairs to the foam in them, the housing of the cameras in front of us, the telephones, televisions, the artificial hip joints, teeth and hair that some of us have, and the various substances in our cars, the steering wheel, for example, or the trim.
I dag er op til 10% af en bils vægt af kuststof Endvidere ved alle. der driver sport, at deres ski. tennisketsjere og navn lig sejlsportsgrej for største delen er af kunststof.
Today 10% of the weight of any car is made up of plastic.
Jeg vil lade Parlamentet selv afgøre, hvad det mener om det, hr. Wedekind sagde. Når hr. Wedekind går ind for noget, går de fleste altid den anden vej.
Mention should also be made of the co-financed demonstration projects relating to plastics in waste and of the proposal for a directive concerning waste incinerators, which was forwarded to us only recently and for which we have just appointed a rapporteur.
Jeg håber, at dette også vil ske i dette tilfælde.
We also hope, Mr Commissioner, that you will soon be submitting a proposal for a directive on waste plastics.
Han råbte lige så meget op i Miljøudvalget.
I hear that instructions to draw one up have already been issued.
Der findes altså uhyre mange anvendelsesmuligheder og derved skånes til dels særdeles værdifulde naturlige materialer.
So there is a very wide range of applications, some of which replace valuable natural substances.
Et meget stort område er emballage, og dermed er jeg fremme ved vort egentlige problem.
A very large consumer is the packaging industry, and this brings me to the actual problem we are now considering.
Jeg tænker her på dåser, flasker, tuber, beholdere, folie, tanke, paller og affaldsspande.
I am referring to cans, bottles, tubes, containers, foils, tanks, pallets and dustbins.
Kunststof er det stof, der i dag falder mest i øjnene i forbindelse med affald, for dets vægt udgør 7% af affaldet fra private husholdninger og dets volumen 20%.
Plastic is the substance we notice most in waste today because it accounts for 7% by weight of our domestic waste, but for 20% by volume.
Man må tage i betragtning, at der i Fællesskabet årligt kommer i alt 110 mio t affald fra private husholdninger, og deraf er 8 mio t kunststoffer.
It must be remembered that a total of 110 million tonnes of domestic waste is produced in the Community each year, 8 million tonnes of it plastics.
Men det årlige forbrug af kunststoffer i Fællesskabet alene androg i 1985 16.8 mio t. Dvs. at disse 16,8 mio t, som endnu ikke er kommet i affaldsspanden, kommer det en gang.
But in the Community alone 16.8 million tonnes of plastics were consumed in 1985.
Det råmateriale, kunststoffer fremstilles af, er naturgas, olie og kul. altså materialer, som er brændbare og indeholder energi.
In other words, these 16.8 million tonnes, which have not yet been dumped, will wind up on the tip one day.
Mosar, medlem af Kommissionen. — (FR) Hr. for mand, jeg vil blot gerne henlede Deres opmærksom hed på de resultater, vi har opnået.
I should just like to add a few words on behalf of my Group.
Jeg vil kunne forelægge Dem en undersøgelse, der viser, at resultaterne i Danmark viser tal. der ligger på mere end 50%.
We shall vote for the report, albeit with some reservations: we call for a separate vote on paragraph 10 because we feel deposits on plastic bottles are really overdue.
Jeg mener endog at kunne sige, at næsten 70% af alle følger de beslutninger, de bestemmelser, der er truffet.
Either beverages are bought in glass bottles, which are then returned, or they are bought in
Lentz-Cornette fald fra private husholdninger, som kommunerne mærkeligt nok i dag skal klare næsten alene.
Lentz-Cornette plastic bottles, which few people are prepared to take back.
Industrien skaber nye produkter, søger nye afsætningsmuligheder.
We also call for a separate vote on paragraph 11 : we only agree to the first half.
Dermed har deres problem hidtil været klaret.
We shall vote against paragraph 13.
Men affaldet blev simpelt hen væltet over på kommunerne eller højst på regionerne.
In this connection I should like once again to point out that the Commissioner and myself have for a long time been in dis agreement about the Convention of London.
Men det er næsten altid kommunerne, som skal sørge for det.
He has promised me many times that the Community would accede to it.
I dag kan man sige : » Vis mig din affaldsspand, og jeg skal sige dig, hvorledes du lever!« Jo bedre vi lever, jo mere vi har råd til, så megen desto mere emballage ligger der i vore affaldsspande.
Now we have been busy on the subject for a year. Now again, on this same subject, I would ask the Commissioner to talk about the situation today as regards Community accession to the Convention of London which, six months ago, he was so sure would come to pass.
Muntingh (S). — (NL) Hr. formand, det er efterhånden ikke længere så sjovt at tale her i Parlamentet som miljöpolitiker.
MUNTINGH (S). — (NL) Mr President, it is gradually becoming not very pleasant to sit here in this Par liament and talk in the capacity of an environment politician.
Hver gang, jeg står her og taler på Den Socialistiske Gruppes vegne, kan jeg fremføre en ny ynkelig kendsgerning, der har at gøre med miljø forurening og/eller miljøtilintetgørelse.
Every time I stand here and speak on behalf of the Socialist Group I have to pick upon some miserable item which has to do with the fouling or destruction of the environment.