natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen er i øjeblikket ved at gennemgå direktivet med det hovedformål at styrke godkendelsesog kontrolprocedurerne, indføre forbrugeroplysning og fastsætte grænseværdier for de eventuelle uønskede stoffer, der findes i vandet som naturlige bestanddele fra kilden.
The Commission is currently undertaking a revision of the directive with a view principally to strengthening the approval and inspection procedures, introducing consumer information, and specifying limits for undesirable substances which may be present in the water as natural components arising from the source.
Når gennemgangen er afsluttet, vil der blive fremsat passende forslag.
When this review is completed appropriate proposals will be made.
Som tidligere meddelt vil Kommissionen fremsætte forslag om en styrkelse af kontrollens effektivitet inden for rammerne af kontroldirektivet 89/397.
Within the framework of the control Directive 89/397 the Commission will be putting forward proposals to strenghten the effectiveness of controls as reported to Parliament in COM(90) final.
Spørgsmål nr. 71 af Stewart
Question No 71, by Mr Ken Stewart
Om: Den britiske regerings manglende overholdelse af Rådets direktiv 85/337/EØF ')
Subject: Failure by the UK to comply with Council Directive 85/337/EEC
Kommissionen har nu modtaget rapporten fra de embedsmænd, der aflagde besøg i Bootle i Merseyside for at vurdere miljøskaderne som følge af Mersey Docks and Harbours Companys oplagring af forskellige former for kul i havneområdet.
The Commission is now in receipt of the report by departmental assistants who came to Bootle on Merseyside to assess the environmental damage caused by the storage of various types of coal dust by the Mersey Docks and Harbour Company on the Dock Estate.
Problemet er nu værre end nogensinde og skaber alvorlige gener for beboerne i området.
The problem is now worse than ever and creates great hardship to the residents of the estates affected.
EF-Domstolen har for nylig truffet en afgørelse, som øjensynlig åbner mulighed for, at virksomheder såsom Merseyside Development Corporation, der repræsenterer den britiske regering i havneområdet, og som ignorerer EF's miljølovgivning (direktiv 85/337/EØF ')), nu kan sagsøges ved de britiske domstole.
It would appear that a recent ECJ judgement has now provided a mechanism whereby public service companies such as the Merseyside Development Corporation, acting for the UK Government on the Dock Estate, who ignore EEC Environment legislation (EEC Directive 85/337/EEC) can be sued in the British Courts.
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte rigtigheden heraf, og vil den i overensstemmelse med Traktatens artikel 169 træffe foranstaltninger til at sikre, at den britiske regering overholder det pågældende direktiv?
Will the Commission confirm that this is correct and state what action it intends to take under Article 169 of the Treaty to ensure the British Government complies with the Directive.
Som det blev meddelt det ærede medlem som svar på hans spørgsmål nr. H-l 103/90, undersøger Kommissionen for øjeblikket alle sagens aspekter på baggrund af den rapport, der er udarbejdet af to tjenestemænd fra Kommissionen, der besøgte havneområdet i juli 1990.
As the Honourable Member has been informed in the reply to his Question No H-1103/90 the Commission is at present examining all aspects of the question based on the mission report made by two officials of the Commission who visited the docks in July 1990.
De oplysninger, som det ærede medlem har modtaget under tidligere brevvekslinger om sagen, inddrages ligeledes i denne undersøgelse. gelse.
The information supplied by the Honourable Member in previous correspondance in the matter is also taken into account in this investigation.
I undersøgelsen af sagen vil Kommissionens tjenestegrene ligeledes skrive til Det Forenede Kongeriges myndigheder og anmode om deres kommentarer til det af det ærede medlem rejste spørgsmål.
In investigating the matter the services of the Commission will also write to the United Kingdom Authorities and request their comments on the questions raised by the Honourable Member.
Før disse undersøgelser er gennemført af Kommissionens tjenestegrene, er Kommissionen ikke i stand til at afgøre, om aktiviteterne og anlæggene i Bootle, Mersey, rent faktisk udgør en overtrædelse af fællesskabslovgivningen.
Before these investigations have been carried out by the services of the Commission, the Commission is not in a position to decide if the practices and installations at Bootle, Mersey do in fact involve an infringement on Community legislation.
Det ærede medlem spørger endvidere, om Merseyside Dock Estate Corporation kan sagsøges ved de britiske domstole, hvis der rent faktisk er tale om om overtrædelse af direktivet om vurdering af de miljømæssige indvirkninger i Bootle-havneområdet.
The Honourable Member also asks whether the Merseyside Dock Estate Corporation could be sued in British courts if an infringement on requirements of the directive on environmental impact assessment has in fact taken place in relation to the Bootle dock.
Kommissionen er ikke ud fra de nuværende, foreliggende oplysninger i stand til at besvare dette spørgsmål.
The Commission is not in a position to answer this question based on the knowledge that is available to the Commission at present.
De foranstaltninger, der er vedtaget for olivenoliesektoren, hænger sammen med ophævelsen af stoppet i Spanien og Portugal den 31. december 1990 og har ingen forbindelse med de igangværende GATT-forhandlinger.
Those measures adopted in the olive oil sector are linked to the end of the standstill in Spain and Portugal on December 31st 1990 and are independent of the ongoing GATT negotiations.
Det er ikke rimeligt at fremføre, at Italien eller nogen anden medlemsstat har øget sin produktion eller eksport hurtigere end Spanien.
It is not fair to say that Italy or any other Member State increased their production or exports more rapidly than Spain.
Spanien er i realiteten det eneste land, hvor produktionen og eksporten er steget betydeligt det seneste par år, især umiddelbart før overgangsperioden.
In fact, Spain is the only country whose production and exports have significantly increased in the last few years and, in particular, immediately prior to the period of accession.
Formålet med stabilisatorerne i olivenoliesektoren er at begrænse udgifterne og modvirke en fremtidig overskudsproduktion.
The objective of the stabilizers in the olive oil sector is to place a limit on expenditure and to discourage excess production in the future.
Disse formål berettiger fuldt ud de nuværende stabilisatorers fortsatte eksistens.
The objectives fully justify the continued existence of the current stabilizers.
Spørgsmål nr. 73 af Newton Dunn
Question No 73, by Mr Newton Dunn
Om: Spørgsmål om subsidiaritet
Subject: Questions of subsidiarity
Westminster Palace ændrer sine regler, så at dets beboere i fremtiden vil kunne foretage gratis telefonsamtaler til Bruxelles.
The Palace of Westminster is changing its rules so that, in future, its occupants will be able to make free telephone calls to Brussels.
Det er ikke muligt at anslå, hvor mange samtaler dets 650 parlamentsmedlemmer plus deres individuelle forskningsassistenter plus de utallige Lords og deres assistenter vil foretage — men det vil med al sikkerhed være mange.
It is not possible to estimate how many calls will be made each day to Brussels by its six hundred and fifty MPs plus their individual research assistants plus the uncountable numbers of Lords and their assistants — but there will certainly be many.
Har Kommissionen nogen planer om at besvare deres forespørgsler vedrørende fællesskabsanliggender ved at forklare subsidiaritetsprincippet og derefter høfligt henvise dem til deres egne nationale ministerier eller til deres parlamentsmedlemmer?
Does the Commission have any plans to reply to their enquiries concerning Community matters by explaining the principle of subsidiarity and then politely referring them to their own national ministries or to their MEPs ?
Vi er taknemlige for det ærede medlems indsats for at hjælpe Kommissionen.
We appreciate the Honourable Member's effort to help the Commission.
Kommissionen vil gøre sit bedste for at imødekomme de nye anmodninger om information.
The Commission will do its best to respond to these new requests for information.
Det er vigtigt, at de nationale parlamenter får oplysning om EF-anliggender.
It is important that national Parliaments should be informed about Community matters.
Subsidiaritet betyder ikke, at sagerne blot skal henvises til de nationale instanser.
Subsidiarity does not just mean referring matters to the national level.
Dér, hvor vi er kompetente, vil vi bestræbe os på at besvare de henvendelser, vi får.
Where we do have a competence we will endeavour to reply to queries that reach us.
Om: Kort som europæisk borger på over 60 år
Subject: European pensioners' card
Kommissionen fremsatte i maj 1989 en henstilling vedrørende et »kort som europæisk borger på over 60 år« (»Europass«).
In May 1989 the Commission drew up a recommendation on the introduction of a 'European pensioners' card' (Europass).
Dette er tænkt som et instrument til fremme af kulturel færdsel og turisme for ældre personer.
This is intended to promote travel and cultural tourism among senior citizens.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om der allerede er sket en konkret opfølgning af dette initiativ i de forskellige medlemsstater?
Can the Commission say if any specific action has been taken on this initiative in the various Member States ?
Kommissionen fører i øjeblikket en korrespondance med medlemsstaterne om dens henstilling om at indføre et kort for borgere over 60 år.
The Commission Recommendation on the introduction on an Over-Sixties' Card is the subject of ongoing correspondance between the Commission and Member States.
Kommissionen har erindret medlemsstaterne om denne sag adskillige gange, senest på det første møde i det nyoprettede rådgivende udvalg vedrørende de ældre og generationernes indbyrdes solidaritet.
The Commission has reminded the Member States several times on this issue and most recently at the first meeting of the newly-established Advisory Committee on the elderly and solidarity between generations.
Om: Monopol inden for irsk sukkerproduktion
Question No 75, by Mr Killilea Subject: Monopoly in Irish sugar production
En statsejet virksomhed, »Irish Sugar Company«, har i mange år haft monopol på køb af sukkerroer og på produktionen af raffineret sukker i Irland.
A state owned company, the Irish Sugar Company, has had a monopoly for many years on the purchase of sugar beet and on the production of refined sugar in Ireland.
Denne virksomhed forventes at blive privatiseret i nær fremtid.
This company is expected to be privatized in the near future.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om opretholdelsen af et monopol i en af EF's medlemsstater på køb af sukkerroer og produktion af raffineret sukker for en virksomhed inden for den private sektor i Irland er i overensstemmelse med Fællesskabets konkurrencepolitik?
Can the Commission indicate if the maintenance of a monopoly in one of the EEC Member States on the purchase of sugar beet and on the production of refined sugar by a private sector company in Ireland is consistent with the Community's competition policies ?
Kommissionen råder ikke i øjeblikket over oplysninger, der gør det muligt for den at tage stilling til en eventuel privatisering af »Irish Sugar Company«.
The Commission does not have the information available at present to express an opinion on a prospective privatization of the Irish Sugar Company.
Som Kommissionen flere gange har oplyst, er Traktatens bestemmelser ikke principielt til hinder for nationaliseringer. Tilsvarende udgør Traktaten heller ikke nogen principiel hindring for privatiseringer. ger.
As the Commission has stated on several occasions, the provisions of the Treaty do not, in principle, preclude nationalization nor, by the same token, do they preclude, privatization.
Kommissionen understreger dog, at konkurrencereglerne og de eksisterende bestemmelser på området skal overholdes, hvis man vil gennemføre sådanne privatiseringer.
However, in the event of such a privatization, the Commission would stress that competition rules and existing legislation must be observed.
Spørgsmål nr. 76 af Blak (H-0052/91)
Question No 76, by Mr Blak (H-0052/91) Subject: Common traffic regulations in the Community
En metode til at sikre en gnidningsfri trafikal kommunikation vil være at tilstræbe fælles færdselsregler på vejene.
One way of ensuring the smooth flow of traffic would be to aim for common traffic regulation on the roads.
Indførelsen af fælles skiltesymboler er nået et godt stykke, men andre fællesregler f.eks. om nærlys om dagen, vigepligt og alkoholpromiller vil gøre vejtransporten sikrere.
Considerable progress has been made with the introduction of common symbols on road signs but other common rules governing, for example, the use of dipped headlights in daytime, right of way and alcohol levels in the blood will make travelling by road safer.
Kommissionen opfordres derfor til at redegøre for, hvilke planer der foreligger for en harmonisering af EF-landenes færdselsregler.
Will the Commission therefore state what plans there are for harmonizing traffic regulations in the Member States ?
De rejser et spørgsmål, som Kommissionen tillægger stor betydning.
The honourable Member has raised a matter to which the Commission attaches great importance.
Allerede i sin meddelelse til Rådet den 9.1.1989 med titlen: »Færdselssikkerhed: et højtprioriteret område for Fællesskabet« gav Kommissionen udtryk for, at der bør indføres fælles sikkerhedsregler på trafikområdet, et aspekt der ikke kan adskilles fra en fælles transportpolitik.
In its communication to the Commission of 9 January 1989 on 'Road Safety : a Community Priority', The Commission already stressed the need to create a common space for road safety which is an essential part of a common policy on road transport.
Retningslinjerne i forbindelse med Det Europæiske Færdselssikkerhedsår 1986 og Europa-Parlamentets målsætninger i 1987 (betænkning af SEEFELD) har dannet grundlag for udarbejdelse af et program for foranstaltninger vedrørende lovgivning og forskning.
The guidelines laid down during European Road Safety Year in 1986 and the objectives defined by the European Parliament in 1987 (Seefeld report) have been the reference points for establishing a programme of legislation and research measures.
Ud over den eksisterende og igangværende lovgivning i forbindelse tekniske forskrifter for køretøjer (hvilket har en positiv indvirkning på sikkerheden), er der siden da forelagt Rådet en pakke af lovgivningsinitiativer, især vedrørende kørekort, hastighedsbegrænsninger, sikkerhedsseler, maksimumsgrænser for alkoholkoncentration i blodet og teknisk kontrol.
In addition to the legislation which already exists or is being drawn up on the technical specifications for vehicles (which has a positive impact on road safety) a large number of legislative initiatives have subsequently been submitted to the Council particularly on driving licences, speed limits, seat belts, maximum alcohol levels in the blood and technical checks.
Rådet har hidtil ikke kunnet vedtage disse initiativer, da tre medlemsstater har draget EF's kompetence vedrørende trafikanternes adfærd (især sikkerhedsseler og alkohol) i tvivl.
The Council has so far not been able to adopt them as its competence where drivers' behaviour is concerned (particularly as regards seat belts and alcohol) has been challenged by three Member States.
Blandt de igangværende initiativer skal jeg især nævne en undersøgelse af vejskiltningen, hvor man især beskæftiger sig med udformningen af budskabet og trafikanternes normale reaktion herpå.
The initiatives currently being considered include a study on road signs giving particular consideration to the way the message is symbolized and the rules of the road to which it
Spørgsmål nr. 77 af McMahon
Question No 77, by Mr McMahon Subject: The implementation of the Social Charter
Under henvisning til det utilfredsstillende svar på mit tidligere spørgsmål H-1275/90 ') om gennemførelsen af socialpagten bedes Kommissionen oplyse følgende:
Following the unsatisfactory nature of the reply to my previous question H-1275/90 ' on the implementation of the Social Charter, will the Commission please explain the following: what actions it has taken to receive information from the Member States as to how they are implementing the Social Charter; why the Commission has not produced a report regarding its own actions on the implementation of the Social Charter ?
Det er rigtigt, at det i pagtens punkt 29 bestemmes, at Kommissionen i løbet af sidste kvartal hvert år skal udarbejde en beretning om medlemsstaternes og Det Europæiske Fællesskabs gennemførelse af pagten.
Paragraph 29 of the Charter states that the Commission is to draw up a report on the application of the Charter by the Member States and the European Community in the last quarter of each year.
I betragtning af, at pagten var blevet vedtaget af de elleve stats- og regeringschefer den 9. december 1989, forekom det ikke videre realistisk at udarbejde en beretning om de foranstaltninger, der var blevet iværksat, hverken på fællesskabs- eller på medlemsstatsplan, eftersom handlingsplanen for gennemførelsen af pagten kun havde været i kraft nogle få måneder.
As the Charter was adopted by the 11 Heads of State or Government on 9 December 1989, it hardly seemed realistic to draw up a report detailing the measures undertaken either at Community level or by the Member States when the action programme implementing the Charter had only been in operation for a few months.
Kommissionen udarbejder dog en fuldstændig beretning i slutningen af 1991 bestående af to dele. I den ene vil der blive gjort rede for udviklingen i EF's instanser.
In view of this fact, the Commission will draw up a full report in two parts for the end of 1991.
Da ingen af medlemsstaterne til dato har fremsendt en rapport over gennemførelsen af pagten, er medlemsstaternes repræsentanter blevet anmodet om at sende Kommissionen de nødvendige oplysninger. ger.
As no Member State has thus far forwarded a report on the application of the Charter, the representatives of the Member States are requested to forward the necessary information to the Commission.
Om: Støtte fra den spanske regering til Intelhorce, S.A.
Question No 78, by Mr José Luis Valverde Lopez Subject: Spanish Government subsidies to Intelhorce S.A.
Kommissionen har sendt en meddelelse til den spanske regering (informationsnummer 90/C 320/07; statsstøtte — C 29/90 (ex NN 88/89) Spanien2) om den støtte, der er blevet ydet til Intelhorce S.A.
The Commission has forwarded a Communication to the Spanish Government (reference 90/C 320/07; state aid — C 29/90, ex NN 88/89/Spain) concerning subsidies granted to Intelhorce S.A. At the time, the selling-off of this company, whose viability and survival are vital to the Andalusian economy, aroused major criticism with regard to its transparency.
Det ville være af største betydning for den offentlige mening i Andalusien, at Kommissionen informerer Parlamentet om resultaterne af den foretagne undersøgelse.
Since the impact on the workforce, their current situation and future are cause for grave public concern in Andalusia, would the Commission report to Parliament on the results of the investigation it carried out ?
Det kunne være relevant at belyse aspekter som f.eks. årsagerne til at forøge virksomhedens egenkapital i 1989, umiddelbart før salget, og at give en oversigt over samt kommentarer og grundene til det foretagne valg af køber.
It would be useful to know the reasons for boosting the undertaking's resources in 1989 immediately prior to the sell-off, and to have a summary, commentary and explanation of the choice of buyer decided on.
Som De omtaler i Deres spørgsmål, besluttede Kommissionen i slutningen af juli 1990 at indlede en procedure i henhold til Traktatens artikel 93 på grund af den økonomiske støtte, som den spanske regering ydede selskabet INTELHORCE i årene fra 1986 til 1989, hvor det endelig blev privatiseret.
As you explain in your question, at the end of July 1990, the Commission decided to initiate a procedure, pursuant to Article 93 of the Treaty, in respect of the financial support supplied by the Spanish Government to the company INTELHORCE during the years 1986 to 1989 when it was finally privatized.
Kommissionens undersøgelse skal især klarlægge, om støtten dengang ændrede konkurrencevilkårene i Fællesskabet i et omfang, som stred mod den fælles interesse, og om den vil kunne gøre det fremover.
The Commission's investigation aims in particular at verifying whether such support has altered in the past, and will be able to harm in the future, the conditions of competition within the Community to an extent which is contrary to the common interest.
Det hedder således i Traktatens artikel 92, stk. 3, litra c): »støtte til fremme af visse erhvervsgrene eller økonomiske regioner (betragtes som forenelige med fællesmarkedet), når den ikke ændrer samhandelsvilkårene på en måde, der strider mod den fælles interesse«.
Article 92(3) (c) of the Treaty actually says: 'aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas, (may be considered to be compatible with the common market) where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest'.
Hvad dette aspekt angår, vil jeg gerne understrege, at mange producenter af bomuldstekstilvarer i andre europæiske lande, som konkurrerer med INTELHORCE, har særdeles ringe produktionsmæssige og økonomiske vilkår, og at Kommissionen skal forhindre, at de enkelte medlemsstaters initiativer fører til en frugtesløs »eksport« af industrielle problemer fra det ene land til det andet.
With regard to this aspect I want to stress the particularly poor productive and economic conditions of many cotton textiles producers in other European countries competing with INTELHORCE, as well as the need for the Commission to avoid that initiatives taken by the single Member States lead to fruitless 'exportations' of industrial problems from one country to another.
Jeg er klar over, at INTELHORCE har stor betydning for Andalusien som region, og at det er nødvendigt at skabe betingelser for, at selskabet hurtigt kan komme på fode igen; og jeg kan forsikre Dem om, at der i undersøgelsen, som endnu ikke er afsluttet, vil blive taget hensyn til alle de punkter, De fremhævede i Deres spørgsmål, inden der træffes en endelig afgørelse.
I am aware of the importance of INTELHORCE for the region of Andalusia and of the necessity of creating the conditions for a quick economic recovery of the company ; and I can ensure you that the enquiry, still in progress, will take into due account for the definition of a final decision all the terms you highlighted in your question.
EF-Tidende nr. C 315 af 14. december indeholder en meddelelse til de berørte parter vedrørende den støtte, Italien har besluttet at tildele Italgrani SpA til bl.a. produktion af alkohol på grundlag af landbrugsprodukter.
In Official Journal C 315 of 14 December there is a notification to interested parties concerning aids which Italy has decided to grant to Italgrani SpA for, among other things, the production of alcohol of agricultural origin.
Vil Kommissionen, eftersom Fællesskabet allerede har et prekært overskud af alkohol fremstillet på grundlag af landbrugsprodukter, give fuldt tilsagn om, at den ikke vil tillade den italienske regering at yde støtte til yderligere forøgelse af dette overskud?
As the Community already has an embarrassing surplus of alcohol of agricultural origin, will the Commission give an absolute undertaking that they will not permit the Italian Government to grant aids to add yet further to the surplus ?
Kommissionen råder ikke over et retsinstrument, der sætter den i stand til at forbyde støtte til et landbrugsprodukt såsom alkohol, der ikke er dækket af en fælles markedsordning.
The Commission has at its disposal no legal instruments enabling it to prohibit aid in respect of an agricultural product, such as alcohol, which is not covered by a common organization of the market.