natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvorfor mener jeg, at det er klogt? Vore landmænd udsættes jo for en masse ting.
We must also guarantee security or survival for small and mediumsized farmers, and it must be ensured that these arrangements are fully consistent with others already introduced or in the pipeline and with a similar purpose.
Vi har allerede i et par år været udsat for produktionstærskler, som vi som landmænd heller ikke har indflydelse på, vi stilles i stigende grad over for stabilisatorer, og nu er det så braklægning.
I do not believe these conditions are being adequately fulfilled, and the serious lack of coordination between the Community institutions which we are witnessing and the hurried and therefore irresponsible manner in which matters are being considered increases my concern.
Jeg tror, at man må give landmændene og hele dette erhverv lidt tid til at finde ud af, hvor dan foden kan lettes fra gaspedalen til produktionen, så man kan komme gennem svinget til en tilpasning af produktionen til markedet.
This is all the more true as we are on the eve of another summit, once again in a climate of disagreement in which there might be a temptation to opt for expedient agreements at the expense of well thought-out, thorough and constructive measures. sures.
Det kræver ikke blot tid, men også eftertanke.
This needs, not just time, but also reflection.
Metoden med braklægning er ikke ny.
The setaside method is nothing new.
Jeg har været med et stykke tid, og jeg erindrer tydeligt i 30'erne duoen Roosevelt-Wallance's såkaldte Agricultural Adjustment Acts i De Forenede Stater.
I have been around for quite a few years, and I well remember the Roosevelt-Wallace Agricultural Adjustment Acts in the United States in the thirties.
Det førte ganske rig tigt — dengang kaldte man det ikke braklægning, men triple A, de trefoldige A-love — til en stor produktionsbegrænsning i midten af 30'erne.
Indeed that — it was not called 'setaside' then but 'triple A', after the initial letters of the legislative package — led to a major production cutback during the mid-thirties.
De efterfulgtes af en enorm genopretning, en enorm opbygning af de amerikanske landbrugs frugtbarhed, en frugtbarhed i øvrigt, der under og i hvert fald efter krigen har reddet ikke blot os, men hele verden fra stor hun gersnød.
That legislation was followed by recovery on a huge scale, a massive replenishment of the fertility of American farmlands, fertility moreover which saved not only us but the whole world from a starvation during and certainly after the war.
Det kræver efter vor mening stor forsigtighed på alle niveauer, og navnlig kræver det garantier for, at der dermed opnås en effektiv reduktion af landbrugsudgifterne.
Every cow in the thirties had a passport, at a time when not even every citizen could get one. We had an earmark for every pig.
Modsat det, der er ønskværdigt, giver disse foranstaltninger ingen garantier for, at en begrænsning af dyrkningsarealet ikke erstattes med en intensivering — navnlig i de mere produktive regioner — med øgede fordele for dem, der i forvejen nyder godt af den fælles landbrugspolitik og af Fællesskabets budget.
There was not a pig in my home country then which did not have an earmark. We had the chicken stocks under control; that did lead to a reduction in production, to an adjustment to market conditions for two or three years.
Endelig savner man også garantier for sikker hed og endda overlevelse for de små og mellemstore bedrifter, udover den nødvendige samkøring af andre foranstaltninger til samme formål, enten allerede vedtagne foranstaltninger eller foranstaltninger der skal vedtages.
Immediately after that — the technology was already developing fast by then — we discovered hens which laid many eggs, pigs which produced much more meat, much enjoyed in Britain which was our market then. Ger many did not buy from us; they already had rationing by then.
Navnlig når vi nu står overfor et nyt topmøde i uenighedens tegn; da kan man falde for fristelsen til at gribe til vilkårlige aftaler på bekostning af bedre gennemtænkte og positive foranstaltninger.
Briefly, I take a positive view of set-aside, but I think it should only be introduced after its advantages and dis advantages have been closely studied in the short and longer term.
På den anden side vil vi minde om, at Parlamentet gentagne gange har udtalt, at omkostningerne i for bindelse med overskudslagrene ikke skal afholdes af de lande, der ikke har bidraget hertil, som tilfældet er med de nye medlemslande, uden at det har vundet genklang i andre institutioner.
It must also be remembered that Parliament has on a number of occasions stated that the cost of surpluses should not be borne by the countries that do not con tribute to them, such as the new Member States, and this has not been supported as it should have been by the other institutions.
Paradoksalt nok oplever vi nu en ny og omvendt situation: jeg tænker her på nødvendigheden af at tage hensyn til visse specifikke tilfælde, nævnlig når det gælder portugisisk landbrug.
Paradoxically, the situation is now precisely the opposite of this: I am referring to the need for account to be taken of certain specific sets of circumstances, and in particular to those of Portuguese agriculture.
Selv om Rådet allerede er gået med til at undtage Portugal fra den tvungne anvendelse af brak lægningsordningen, omend kun i overgangsperioden, og på trods af, at Kommissionen også gør det, men
The Council has already agreed to exempt Portugal from compulsory application of the setaside system, although only during the transitional period, and the Commission has done like wise, although only during the first phase of the transitional period.
Jeg går lidt længere tilbage i tiden, hr. formand, hr. kommissær, men jeg kan huske den tid, da vi måtte skære ned i mit land. Vi havde skitser for hver enkelt ko.
Yet despite this, and despite the proposal I supported and jointly put forward in the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Mr Navarro Velasco's report contains no reference what soever to the need for account to be taken of these situations.
Hver ko i Nederlandene havde i 30'erne et pas, og det var ikke enhver borger, den dengang kunne få fat i dem.
This is clearly a politically motivated omission, which I strongly oppose.
Vi havde et øremærke for hvert enkelt svin. Der var dengang ikke et eneste svin i mit fædreland, der ikke havde øremærke.
Finally, I believe it is unacceptable that setaside should be financed by the EAGGF Guidance Section.
Vi havde begrænsninger i hønseavlen; det medførte faktisk produktionsbegrænsning og tilpasning til afsætningsmulighederne i to til tre år.
This would constitute a further contradiction of the principles Parliament has itself laid down concerning the role of the structural funds in the interest of economic and social cohesion.
der dengang var vores afsætningsmarked.
This whole proposal reeks of wheeling and dealing, because officially there is no proposal.
Tyskland købte ikke noget, de havde allerede rationeringsmærker i landet.
Officially the Commission's text has as yet no legal status.
I løbet af nogle år var alt dette blevet indhentet af teknologien.
The whole procedure has been violated.
Men produktionsbegrænsningen omfattede dog også oprettelsen af et enormt kontrolapparat.
The Commission is waiting for the Agriculture Council to move.
Jeg tror; at vi også skal medtage dette aspekt, kontrollen, i vore overvejelser.
The Council of Ministers is waiting for the European Council to move.
Braklægningen fremlægges for os som en slags sødemiddel for stabilisatorordningen.
At this stage of the proceedings, the European Council is probably waiting for divine inspiration.
For titusinder af små, traditionelle landmænd, særligt i Fællesskabets mere ugunstigt stillede egne, ville det betyde, at man satte en stopper for generationers slid og indsats fra de mennesker, som har størst behov for beskyttelse.
This whole issue is slapstick, rushed and badly thought out and would certainly need far more in-depth study.
Jeg er glad for, at hr. Christopher Jackson er her i aften, idet han tidligere foreslog, at vi skulle tage et helikopter-overblik over braklægningsproblemerne.
I am glad that Mr Christopher Jackson is here this evening because he suggested earlier that we should take a helicopter view of the problems of set-aside.
Jeg vil gerne bringe ham ned på jorden igen og bede ham se på disse tal:
I would like to bring him down to earth and have him look at the following figures.
Fællesskabet producerer 155 millioner tons kornprodukter pr. år, importerer mere end 55 millioner tons kornerstatningsprodukter og eksporterer 12 millioner tons kornprodukter.
The Community produces 155 million tonnes of cereals per annum, imports over 55 million tonnes of cereal substitutes and exports 12 million tonnes of cereals.
Man behøver ikke at være med lem af Budgetudvalget for at forstå disse tal.
You do not need to be a member of the Committee on Budgets to understand these figures.
Vi importerer, hvad der svarer til 35% af vor egen produktion, mens vi kun eksporterer 8%.
We import the equivalent of 35% of our own production, we only export 8%.
Under mødeperioden i december godkendte Parla mentet de forskellige forslag om stabiliseringsmekanismer — hvilket jeg beklager meget.
At the December partsession Parliament approved the various stabilizer proposals — which I greatly regret.
Lad mig erindre om, at et flertal i Parlamentet gik ind for, at vi begrænsede produktionen af 14 produkter til 3,5 millioner tons, mens vi skatte — og/eller afgiftsfrit importerer 24 millioner tons — 7 gange så meget.
Let me remind you that a majority in this Parliament approved limiting the production of 14 products to 3.5 million tonnes, whereas we import tax and/or duty free 24 million tonnes — 7 times more.
Hvor når vil denne form for udsalgsvanvid høre op?
When is this type of sell-out madness going to stop?
Jeg kan ganske tydeligt huske kommissær Andriessens udtalelser — og han er jo heldigvis til stede her i aften — for relativt nylig om, at en afgift på olie og fedtstoffer var en absolut forudsætning for Kommissionens pakkeløsning.
I distinctly recall statements made by Commissioner Andriessen — who I am delighted is with us this evening — not so very long ago that a tax on oils and fats was a sine qua non part of the Commission's package.
Hr. Andriessen, jeg kan huske, at De offentligt udtalte, at hvis der ikke var enighed på rådsniveau i denne sag, så ville De tage hele pakken tilbage.
Mr Andriessen, I remember you stating publicly that if there were no agreement at Council level on this special issue, you would withdraw the entire package.
Ville De have noget imod at fortælle os her i aften, hvor De nu står i dette spørgsmål?
Would you mind telling us here this evening where you stand on this issue now?
Nitsch (ARC). — (DE) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, jeg behøver vist ikke nu at fremmane de små og mellemstore bønder, det er allerede blevet gjort i tilstrækkelig grad.
NITSCH (ARC). — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, presumably I need not go into the question of the small and mediumsized farmers now, that has been done enough.
Vi grønne og alternative er ikke for planen om braklægning, fordi man igen engang lader de velproducerende og gode arealer ude af betragtning.
We Greens and Alternatives are not in favour of the idea of setting land aside because once again it does not affect the productive and most favourable sites.
Det er, ligesom hvis man på landbrugsoverskudsproduktionens landevej lod lastvognene gå fri, men lagde afgift på personvognenes bagagerum.
That is as though, if we look upon agricultural surpluses as a road, we did not touch lorries but imposed a tax on the boots of private cars.
End videre spørger jeg mig selv, hvorledes det hele skal gennemføres.
But I also wonder how the whole package is to be implemented.
Skal der f. eks. stå en sherif bag hver kohale?
Will there be a sheriff skulking behind every cow?
Eller vil man placere en »braklægningsopsynsmand« bag hver busk, som endnu ikke er fældet?
Or will a setaside warden be posted behind every bush that has not yet been cut down?
Det ville måske løse et og andet arbejdsløshedsproblem, men ikke landbrugets problemer!
That could solve quite a few unemployment problems, but not the problems of agriculture!
Fru Thatcher er den berømte torn i siden på Fælles skabets landbrug.
Mrs Thatcher is the proverbial thorn in the side of Community agriculture.
Nu vil hun have smør fra New Zealand på begge sider af brødet. Hun insisterer på, at New Zealand skal have præferencebehandling.
Now she wants New Zealand butter on both sides of her bread.
Hun nægter at gå med til, at der lægges skat på hendes venner i margarineindustrien.
She refuses taxation on her friends in the margarine industry.
Hun fornægter med andre ord kolossale indtægter for Fællesskabets bud get, som ville betyde en enorm lettelse i den nuvæ
In a word, she refuses vast receipts for the Community budget which would alleviate the current situation immensely. On the other hand, she insists on yet more cuts in agricultural spending.
Det forudsætter et vigtigt princip, også for disse tredjelande, nemlig self reliance, størst mulig selvforsyning.
Nitsch supposes another principle of importance, to those third countries as well: the greatest possible degree of self-reliance.
Saneringen kan således være et forvarsel om sanering af hele økonomien.
Such a process of readjustment could be the forerunner of a readjustment of the economy as a whole.
Nyvurdering af livet på landet vil også fremme decentraliseringen af de store byområder.
A reappraisal of the countryside will also assist the decentralization of the large conurbations.
Også braklægningen er i sin indre logik orienteret præcis således. Den tjener i sidste instans de store.
of rehabilitating the land or at least lighten the burden for them a little, then we should consider how to reduce the chemicalization of farming.
Endvidere bør vi måske ved lejlighed, hr. Andriessen, drøfte et forbud mod midler til at gøre stråene kortere.
And perhaps, Commissioner Andriessen, we should discuss banning the substances used to reduce the height of crops.
Det vil måske forskrække nogle lobbyister, som føler sig forpligtede over for den kemiske industri, men det er spørgsmål, som ved lejlighed skal tages op i disse forsamlinger.
That may shock some lobbyists who feel obligated towards the chemical industry, but these are questions that must at last be raised in these forums.
Endelig vil et sundt, menneskeligt fællesskab, hvor folk lever i harmoni med hinanden og med naturen, blive fremmet.
Finally a healthy human society can be promoted in which people live in harmony with each other and with nature.
Jeg ville bestemt også gerne engang rose ordføreren, men jeg fandt det ikke særlig pænt, at alle mine for slag næsten enstemmigt blev fejet af bordet i Udvalget om Landbrug, Fiskeri og Ernæring.
Indeed, I too would like to be able to praise the rapporteur, but I did not think it was very nice the way all my proposals were thrown out almost unanimously in the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
Lad os dog tale med dem, det angår, med de så ofte nævnte små bønder fra de truede regioner og ikke altid bare i smukke taler fremmane noget for dernæst i praksis at følge en linje, som ikke hjælper disse mennesker — for disse mennesker er toget i grunden allerede kørt!
Let us also talk to those concerned, to the much-cited small farmers from the endangered regions instead of always making promises in Sunday speeches but then in fact following a course that does not help these people — basically, these people have already missed the train!
De har kun tilbage at indstille sig på at modtage almisser fra en eller anden forvaltning.
All they can do now is to prepare to take charitable hand-outs from whatever administration.
Vil vi måske degradere landmanden til opsynsmand i en park på et fredet område, hvor han så for en lille grundløn samler bortkastet bolchepapier op, og alt det under miljøbeskyttelsens auspicier?
Do we want to degrade the farmer into a national park keeper who picks up the litter for a small wage, and all this under the heading of environmental protection?
Miljøbeskyttelse betyder at forhindre, at arealerne fortsat ødelægges, betyder at standse erosionen, at gøre et forsøg på at sætte en stopper for det vanvid, som brugen af kemikalier og mekanisering er, som genteknikken er — lige til superkoen eller det sødmælkssvin, der kan lægge æg.
Environmental protection means preventing the further destruction of the land, means halting erosion, trying to put a stop to the madness of chemical mechanization, the madness of genetic technology — from the super-cow to the egg-laying woolly milk pig.
Rothe (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, emnet braklægning bliver navnlig efter det tyske rådsformandskabs ønske et vigtigt punkt i forhandlingerne på topmødet i denne uge.
ROTHE (S). — (DE) Mr President, honourable members, at the special request of the German Presidency of the Council, the setaside scheme is to be a major topic of discussion at the summit this week.
Det er således rigtigt, at vi også i denne uge afgiver en principiel udtalelse om dette problemkompleks uden dog at udtale os definitivt om detaljerne, for braklægning må under ingen omstændigheder anses for løsningen på overskudskrisen og eventuelt gennemføres som alternativ til de nødvendige landbrugsstabilisatorer.
So it is quite right that we should deliver an opinion of principle on the matter this week, without however making any definitive pronouncement on the details, for the setaside scheme must under no circumstances be seen as the solution to the crisis resulting from the surpluses or carried out as an alternative to the neces sary agricultural stabilizers.
Alle hidtidige er faringer får en til at tvivle på braklægningsprogrammers succes, og det er mig til en vis grad uforståeligt, at den tyske forbundsregering så stædigt tror på effektiviteten af denne foranstaltning.
All the experience to date makes it seem most doubtful whether the setaside programme will succeed, and I find it rather difficult to understand how the Federal German Government can persevere in its assumption that it will be effective.
Selv om en produktionssænkning skulle give et godt resultat, må man gå ud fra, at med en forventet produktivitetsforøgelse på ca. 2 til 2.5% ville denne end ikke blive udlignet gen nem den planlagte braklægning afea. 1,4% af land brugsarealerne i EF.
Even if it succeeded in terms of curbing production, it is to be assumed that given a likely productivity increase of 2 —2'/2%, this increase would not even be offset by the planned setting aside of some 1.4% of farm land in the EEC.
Jeg tror, at det gør det endnu vanskeligere, at en væsentlig formindskelse af pro duktionen er meget tvivlsom.
Another complicating factor is that it is very doubtful whether production would be substantially reduced.
Erfaringerne fra USA med seZ-oy/ife-programmet underbygger denne tvivl.
Experience with the setaside programme in the USA support these doubts.
Hvis intensiveringen fortsætter på de øvrige arealer, kommer der hverken en mængdemæssig eller en økologisk fordel ud af det, især da også de første erfaringer med det såkaldte grønne braklægningsprogram i den tyske delstat Niedersachsen viser, at først og fremmest dårlige jorder tages ud af produktion.
If intensive farming is encouraged on the remaining farmland, there will be neither quantitative nor ecological ben efits, especially when we see that the early experience with the setaside programme in the German Land of Lower Saxony proves that low-yield land is taken out of production first.
Ud fra denne synsvinkel må man frygte uheldige følger for landbrugsstrukturen navnlig i de ugunstig stillede områder i Fællesskabet, og dertil kommer forventede prisstigninger på jord, når jorden bliver knap.
Under these conditions, it is to be feared that the scheme will also have adverse effects on the rural structure of the lessfavoured regions of the Community, partly due to the fact that land prices are likely to rise as a result of the shortage of land.
Efter min mening skal man således se på braklægningsprogrammet med den allerstørste skepsis.
So in my view we must look at the setaside programme extremely sceptically.
Naturen er en gave, der er os givet, og som vi derfor ikke blot skal betragte økono misk.
Nature is a gift which has been handed down to us and which we should there fore not view in exclusively economic terms.
Det er meget mere : Jorden er vor moder, som vi skal behandle med respekt.
It is much more: the earth is our mother, and we must have respect for her.
Braklægningspolitikken er et grundigt indgreb, der skal forberedes godt, og som skal tages op til vurdering efter nogle år.
The setaside policy is a major intervention which should be properly prepared and should be evaluated after a few years.
Omlægningen til grønsagsavl og skovdrift skal derfor ske efter en plan, flugten bort fra landet skal hindres, og det er i den forbindelse nødvendigt med en seriøs social ledsageforanstaltning.
The switch to vegetable growing and forestry activities should proceed accord ing to a plan, an exodus from the countryside must be avoided and serious provision needs to be made for the social problems arising.
Det er også vigtigt, at man om nødvendigt kan lade landbrugerne gå over til grønsagsdyrkning, skovdrift og miljøforanstaltninger. De har erfaring!
It is also important that we should be able, where necessary, to let farmers switch to vegetable growing, forestry and management of the environment.
Trods disse betænkeligheder er vi ikke principielt imod forslaget om braklægning.
To begin with it is important that we produce farm products in Europe according to need.
Til slut lige en bemærkning: Vi kan under ingen omstændigheder affinde os med et punkt, med en passus i Navarro-betænkningen eller være enig i den, nemlig forslaget om, at omkostningerne finansieres over EUGFL's Udviklingssektion.
One final remark: under no circumstances can we accept one point made in a paragraph of the Navarro report, namely the proposal that the costs be financed from the Guidance Section.
Her håber jeg, at et ændringsforslag, som korrigerer dette punkt i Na varro-betænkningen, vedtages.
I hope an amendment will be accepted that corrects this point in the Navarro report.
(Bifald)
(Applause) burden should not be placed on the European Community alone.
Jeg holder ikke nogen for svarstale for protektionisme, men derimod for en for delende retfærdighed. Man må ikke kun lægge byrderne på De europæiske Fællesskabet.
If we want to get the surplus problem under control, it must be tackled on a world scale to start with.
Ellers er dette program næsten meningsløst.
Otherwise this programme is almost mean ingless.
Vi har også kunnet høre det fra Landbrugsudvalgets enige holdning, og jeg tror, at Parlamentet også vil reagere herpå.
We have heard that in the unanimous conclusion of the Committee on Agriculture, and I think that Parliament should follow that lead.
Det er klart, at GATT-aftaler spiller en rolle i den forbindelse.
Clearly GATT agreements play a role here.
Det er ligeledes klart, at handelsinteresser og politiske interesser spiller en rolle, men vi må ikke lægge følgerne af braklægningen ensidigt over på landbruget. Der er flere »skyldige«.
It is equally clear that commercial and political interests play a role, but we must not expect agriculture to bear the consequences of setaside alone.
Tolman (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, når jeg ser mig omkring, tror jeg ikke, at landbrugsjord ligger brak, men at Parlamentet derimod næsten ligger brak i aftentimerne!
TOLMAN (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, when I look around, I think it is not so much land down on the farm, but Parliament in the evening hours which is lying fallow!
Eyraud (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, hr. Tolman ind drog elskværdigt alle socialisterne i debatten i forbin delse med en af tidligere kommissær Mansholt frem sat erklæring.
EYRAUD (S). — (FR) Mr President, Mr Tolman has kindly cast doubt on the position of the Socialists as a whole in relation to a statement by the former Commissioner Mr Mansholt.