natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det er grunden til, at mit spørgsmål, hr. kommissær, er stilet til Kommissionen som Traktatens vogter.
That is why my question, Commissioner, is addressed to the Commission as the guardian of the treaties.
De er i kraft af Rom-Traktaten Traktaternes vogter.
Under the Treaty of Rome, you are the guardians of the Treaty.
Denne funktion vil blive stadfæstet af Maastricht-Traktaten.
That will be confirmed by the Maastricht treaty.
Derfor stiller jeg Kommissionen, Traktat ernes vogter i henhold til artikel 155 i Rom-Traktaten, følgende spørgsmål: hvad har De gjort for at sikre Fællesskabets fulde repræsentation i alle CSCE's institutioner og mere præcist, hvilke skridt har De taget eller vil De tage i løbet af de få uger, der er tilbage inden åbningen af CSCE-Forsamlin-gen, med henblik på, at Europa-Parlamentet indgår som ligeberettiget medlem af denne forsamling, og mener De, at Fællesskabet, dersom Parlamentet holdes uden for denne forsamling, fortsat kan foregive at blive betragtet som Signatar af Paris-chartret med samme rettigheder som de øvrige signatarer?
Let me put therefore to the Commission, guardian of the treaties under Article 155 of the Treaty of Rome, the following question: what have you done to ensure that the Community will be fully represented in all the institutions of the CSCE and, more specifically, what steps have you taken or will you be taking in the few weeks remaining to us before the CSCE parliamentary conference is con vened to ensure that the European Parliament is included as a member de jure of that conference, and do you consider that if Parliament is left out ofthat parliamentary conference, the Community can still claim to be being treated as signatory of the Charter of Paris on an equal footing with the other signatories?
Mulighed nr. to er internationalt samarbejde mellem eksisterende parlamenter, hvad enten det er nationale eller internationale parlamenter.
I should have put a rather similar to the Council of Ministers, had time permitted, but we have been thwarted by the deadlines; I should have asked what steps have been taken by the presidency of the Council of Ministers or by the ministers meeting in European Political Cooperation to prevent the status of the European Community as a whole being undermined if Parliament is not included de jure in the CSCE parliamentary conference.
Et godt eksempel er den europæiske parlamentskonference i Rom, som nogle af os deltog i i november 1990.
COT (S). — (FR) Mr President, Commissioner, forgive me, but I do not quite understand.
Dette samarbejde foregår normalt under uformelle, smidige former og rejser snarere problemer angående praksis, læs: modtagelighed, end principielle problemer. mer.
This is probably a Cartesian failing but I have to confess that I cannot understand how one can be a party and not a party and how one can be a signatory without that fact producing effects and I am rather disconcerted by your reply.
Mulighed nr. tre er den, der vedrører det foreliggende tilfælde.
I thought that meant Community involvement in the CSCE and the CSCE institutions.
Oprettelsen af en parlamentarisk institution inden for rammerne af en international organisation.
I thought it meant that the Community could make its voice heard in the various institutions of the CSCE.
Det er tilfældet med Vestunionen, med Europarådet og NATO og navnlig, om jeg så må sige, med De Europæiske Fællesskaber.
Would you confirm or refute those views? As far as I have understood, it is a matter of yes and no, but I should like to be a clearer on this point.
Vort eget Parlament er i den henseende en institution på lige fod med Kommissionen og Rådet.
That is my first supplementary question.
Det forekommer mig under alle omstændigheder udelukket, hr. formand, at Parlamentet skal være repræsenteret halvt eller have adgang som observatør i en sådan forsamling.
At any event, Mr President, it seems to me that Parliament cannot be half represented or admitted as an observer to such a conference.
Der er, jeg gentager, tale om et principspørgsmål, som vedrører Fælles skabets repræsentation udadtil.
This is, let me repeat, a question of principle involving the external representation of the Community.
I et sådant tilfælde skal vi enten være der, eller ikke være der, og dersom det sidstnævnte skulle blive tilfældet, skal vi have en forklaring på hvorfor.
In a case of that kind, either we are represented or we are not, and if we are not, we need to be told why.
Hr. formand, de bemærkninger, jeg netop har frem sat, de spørgsmål, som jeg stiller hr. Matutes og Kommissionen er, det gentager jeg, foranlediget af min gruppe, men en række parlamentsmedlemmer af anden observans ønsker også at være med. Forretningsordenen gør, at der er tale om en dialog mellem to.
You acknowledge — and this is the subject of my second supplementary question — that the Charter of Paris set up this parliamentary body: it refers to it explicitly by seeking greater parliamentary involvement and the set ting-up of a CSCE parliamentary assembly.
Nu er det den andens tur til at sige noget.
That is a very specific question and I should like you to tell me what steps have or have not been taken.
Men det, der foregår i Budapest i begyndelsen af juli, er, at en parlamentarisk institution inden for rammerne af Konferencen om Sikkerhed og Samarbejde i Europa samler repræsentanter for de parlamenter, hvis lande har undertegnet Paris-chartret. Fællesskabet har undertegnet dette charter sammen med medlemsstaterne og har derfor del i chartret med samme rettigheder og pligter som de andre signatarstater, så vidt jeg kan se.
Mr President, the comments I have made and the ques tions I am putting to Commissioner Matutes and the Commission are, I repeat, being put on behalf of my group but also on behalf of a number of honourable Members from other groups who wish to be associated with this question.
Fællesskabet skal derfor være repræsenteret i CSCE's forskellige institutioner på lige fod med de øvrige signatarer.
The rules require that this be a meeting of minds.
Men det er netop det, der er ved at aftegne sig i forbindelse med mødet i Budapest, som finder sted om nogle uger.
The commitment has to come from him.
Matutes, medlem af Kommissionen. — (ES) Hr. formand, Kommissionen læser naturligvis altid med stor opmærksomhed de spørgsmål, der stilles til den af Parlamentets medlemmer, og for mit vedkommende måske især når spørgsmålet stilles af hr. Cot.
MATUTES, Member of the Commission. — (ES) Mr President, naturally the Commissioners always read eve ry question put down by this Parliament with great care, especially me, and if I may say so, especially when the person putting the question happens to be Mr Cot!
Paris-chartret blev, som hr. Cot erindrede om, undertegnet den 21. november 1990 af deltagerstaterne i Konferencen om Sikkerhed og Samarbejde i Europa.
The Paris Charter, as Mr Cot has so effectively reminded us, was signed on 21 November by all the states that took part in the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe.
Fællesskabet undertegnede chartret på den af det ærede medlem omtalte måde, fordi en del af
The Community signed the Charter just as the honourable member has indicated, because some of the
Personligt forstår jeg ikke, at Fællesskabet, og jeg siger Fællesskabet og ikke Parlamentet, kan deltage halvt, få et klapsæde der, hvor andre, der har undertegnet Paris-chartret, sidder i lænestole. Der er her tale om et spørgsmål om den respekt, Fællesskabet har krav på, og i Fælles skabet om overholdelsen af den Traktat, der er Fællesskabets grundlag.
And to answer your second question, as I have already said, various measures have been taken with a view to achieving the status of full member for the Community as a whole and, therefore, of each and every one of its institutions, which is no obstacle to Parliament
Matutes de emner, der behandles i chartret henhører under Fællesskabets kompetence.
MATUTES in its turn taking whatever steps are considered appropriate, in accordance naturally, with its legitimate rights.
Men i dette tilfælde er den overdrevne kartesianske tænkemåde måske på min side, for hvis der er noget, der er karakteriserer en sådan tænkemåde, er det sondringen mellem part og fuldgyldigt medlem. Og heri ligger netop gådens løsning.
tee and the time it reaches plenary, there is a gap, sometimes rather too long a gap, such that some of the data or observations contained in this report may appear out of date, something for which I apologize in advance.
Jeg kan således bekræfte, at Kommissionen deler hr. Cots bekymringer og ønsker.
Basically, however, I think the process remains valid.
Herman (PPE). — (FR) Hr. formand, vi skal have forklaret meningen med hr. Delors' underskrift.
HERMAN (PPE). — (FR) Mr President, the significance of President Delors having signed the Charter needs to be explained to us.
Hvorfor acceptere, at Kommissionens og dens for mands navne står på en aftale, når det for os ikke har nogen som helst betydning, hverken praktisk, politisk eller konkret?
Why agree to the names of the Commission and its President appearing in an agreement when, as far as we are concerned, it is of no consequence, either practical, political or in real terms?
De siger, der skal skelnes mellem partner og medlem.
You say that a distinction has to be made between partner and member.
Hvad er forskellen?
What is that distinction?
Ved første øjekast er vi ikke medlemmer.
At first sight, we are not members.
Men hvad betyder partner her?
But what does partner mean in this context?
Partner betyder ret til at deltage, Kommissionens eller dens formands ret til at deltage i møderne, og det skulle så være alt?
Does it mean the right to be present, the right of the Commission or its President to attend meetings and nothing more?
Drejer det sig blot om en klapstol til en observatør?
Does it mean the position of observer?
Er det meningen med, betydningen af Deres underskrift?
Is that the significance of that signature?
Cot (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, hr. kommissær, undskyld, men jeg forstår det ikke rigtigt.
What was the aim of the Committee on External Economic Relations and its rapporteur in drafting this text?
Jeg mener, at enten har Fællesskabet undertegnet Paris-chartret, eller også har det ikke undertegnet det.
It was at one and the same time to take stock of a situation and to suggest a number of pointers for reflection and practical proposals.
Jeg mente at have forstået, at Paris-chartret var blevet undertegnet af hr. Jacques Delors, formand for Kommissionen, og af hr. Giulo Andreotti, som på det tidspunkt var formand for Rådet.
When the countries of Central and Eastern Europe changed their political structures and set out on what was for them the difficult path towards developing a free economy, a competitive economy, a market economy, the Community immediately supplemented that effort.
Jeg troede, at dette derfor medførte Fællesskabets deltagelse i CSCE og i CSCE's institutioner.
It supplemented it without delay as far as a number of emergency aid measures were concerned.
Jeg troede, at det gjorde det muligt for Fællesskabet at lade sin stemme lyde i CSCE's forskellige institutioner. Jeg vil gerne have, at de enten be- eller afkræfter mine synspunkter.
It also supplemented it by implementing the PHARE programme and by negotiating and concluding a different type of association agreement, the European agreements.
Så vidt jeg har forstået, er det ja eller nej, og jeg vil gerne have noget mere at vide om dette punkt.
Elsewhere, a number of technical and financial instruments have been put into effect to help along this development.
Det er mit første supplerende spørgsmål.
That, in particular, is one of the responsibilities of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Cot (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg vil lige stille kommissær Matutes et sidste spørgsmål; vi generer ham nok lidt med vor stædighed.
COT (S). — (FR) Mr President, I wanted to put one last question to Commissioner Matutes, whom we are probably embarrassing somewhat by being so persistent.
Det gør mig ondt for ham, men det er jo nu en gang det, vi er her for.
I am sorry about that but, after all, that is why we are here.
Jeg vil spørge ham, om han kan forpligte sig til inden Budapest at henvende sig til medlemsstaterne og navnlig til Kommissionen med henblik på at finde en løsning på situationen, som den ser ud, og med henblik på at Parlamentet kan deltage i konferencen i Budapest, lige som Kommissionen så for modentlig skal deltage i konferencens plenarmøder.
I wanted to ask him if he would undertake to approach, before Budapest, the Member States and the Commission in particular in an effort to find a solution to the current situation and enable Parliament to attend the Budapest conference in the same way as, it would appear, the Commission attends plenary meetings of the conference.
Matutes, medlem af Kommissionen. — (ES) Hr. formand, jeg mener ikke, at sondringen mellem part og fuldgyldigt medlem er ny, og jeg mener heller ikke, at dette koncept ækvivalerer med partner.
The problems facing the states of Central and Eastern Europe and the states born of the break-up of the Soviet Union — that break-up represents a problem in itself and I shall have a word to say about it in my conclusion — are manifold.
I så godt som alle internationale instanser findes der forskellige former for status. Jeg erindrer f.eks. om Fællesskabets position i FN, hvor vi har observatør status, vi er repræsenteret, men vi er ikke fuldgyldigt
There is no question but that if they are to build modern economies, these states need a great deal of investment from both the public sector and — this is the main object of the report — the private sector.
Mit spørgsmål er, hvilke skridt Kommissionen helt præcist har taget over for de andre parter i CSCE vedrørende Europa-Parlamentets deltagelse i denne instans.
MATUTES, Member of the Commission. — (ES) Mr President, I do not think the distinction between the part and the whole is new, and the concept of partner and associate is not equivalent.
Har Kommissionen, som er Traktaternes vogter, hen vendt sig til udenrigsministrene?
In virtually all international forums there are different statuses.
Det er et meget præcist spørgsmål, og jeg vil gerne have, at De fortæller mig, hvilke skridt der er taget eller ikke taget.
Let me remind you, for example, of our position in the United Nations, where we are observers: we are represented there but we are not members.
Og det samme er tilfældet i mange andre instanser.
And this occurs in many other instances.
Efter min mening er det under alle omstændigheder en fordel, at Fællesskabet er til stede over alt, hvor det måtte have noget at sige, selv om det i begyndelsen ikke er fuldgyldigt medlem.
Nevertheless, in my opinion, it is good for the Community to be present wherever it has something to say even if it cannot be a full member right from the start.
grammet.
My comments cover two areas, and I shall try to be brief.
Det fulgte ligeledes denne bestræbelse op med forhandling om og indgåelse af associeringsaftaler af en ny type, de europæiske aftaler.
The first concerns the states themselves and the second the Community or Community undertakings and what they can do for those states.
Derudover er der iværksat en række tekniske og finansielle instrumenter med henblik på at lette denne udvikling.
To begin with, we have to understand that there are very considerable differences between the states of Central and Eastern Europe.
Det er f.eks. en af de roller, Den Europæiske Bank for Genopbygning og Udvikling har.
Nevertheless, the problems remain the same.
Jeg gør ligeledes opmærksom på, at Fællesskabet uden at være fuldgyldigt medlem af FN dog er blevet indbudt som fuldgyldigt medlem til konferencen i Rio, i hvis åbning Kommissionens delegation deltog under min ledelse.
I want to remind you now that while not a full member of the United Nations, the Community was in fact invited as a full member to the Conference that is currently taking place in Rio and I myself headed the Commission's delegation at its opening session.
Kun indefra kan en given status forbedres og Fællesskabet således opnå den status, som det er berettiget til.
Because it is only possible to go on improving our status from within, and in the end we will succeed in obtaining the status we ought to have.
Så meget vedrørende det første spørgsmål.
That is on the first question.
Formanden. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
I cannot commit myself to anything more.
A3-162/92) af Benoit for Udvalget om Eksterne Økonomiske Forbindelser om investeringerne i østlandene og sikkerhedsstillelsen herfor.
A3-162/92) by Mr Benoit, on behalf of the Committee on External Economic Relations, on investments in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the guarantees for those investments.
Af disse fire sikkerhedsforanstaltninger vil jeg som den første nævne politisk sikkerhed, garantien for, at den demokratiske pluralisme, friheden og demokratiet, således som vi udøver det, virkelig er stabilt og varigt trods de risikomomenter, der hist og her dukker op.
The first of the four safeguards is the political safeguard: the guarantee that democratic pluralism, freedom and democracy as we practice it are established and will remain in place despite occasional hiccups.
Den anden sikkerhed er en juridisk garanti for f.eks. ejendomsretten.
The second consists in a legal guarantee, particularly as regards the right of ownership.
Også her skal bestemmelserne være klare. Den tredje sikkerhed er en garanti, som jeg kalder en økonomisk garanti, dvs. viden om den juridiske ramme for investeringer, om lovene vedrørende investeringer.
Here too, the rules must be clear.
Også på det punkt er det nødvendigt, at staterne får afklaret en række spørgsmål.
Here again, those states must clarify a number of points.
Endelig som den fjerde sikkerhed en skattemæssig garanti med henblik på, at spillereglerne også på det punkt er præcise og de potentielle investorer kender den skatteordning, de vil blive undergivet, så at de er sikre på en vis stabilitet, for en investering bliver først rentabel på lang sigt.
And finally we come to the fourth safeguard, a fiscal guarantee such that here too the rules of the game are clear and potential investors are familiar with the taxation system to which they will be subject, as investments are productive only in the medium or long term.
En investering er ikke så enkel en handling som en klassisk handel, den er noget andet, den er en form for deltagelse i disse staters økonomiske udvikling.
An investment is not simply a trade measure in the traditional sense, it is something different, resembling rather the acquisition of a holding in the economic development of these states.
Den første forudsætning er derfor det, jeg kalder de fire sikkerhedsforanstaltninger.
That is there fore the first condition, what I call the four safeguards or guarantees.
Det fulgte den op uden tøven med en række nødhjælpsforanstaltninger.
BENOIT (S), rapporteur. — (FR) Let me begin with a preliminary and brief comment.
Det fulgte den endvidere op med iværksættelsen af PHARE-pro-
Between the time when a report is drafted, considered and adopted by the commit
Men indbyrdes forskelle resulterer i nogen konkurrenceforvridende virkning.
BENOIT in Central and Eastern European countries.
Det samme gælder for øvrigt også for genforsikringsbetingelser for investeringer.
Germany and the Netherlands, for example, are already doing that.
Derfor kan en EF-investeringsbeskyttelsesaf-tale og også en europæisk genforsikringspolice anbefales, hvorved man for at få denne til at virke ordentligt burde gå ud fra harmonisering mod det højeste niveau.
The second condition is that the states should establish specific priorities for their economic development and that undertakings wishing to take part in such investment, in joint ventures, should be aware of the priority development sectors, and it should not all be left rather vague.
Dermed bliver det for erhvervslivet mere tiltrækkende at investere i Østeuropa.
A harmonized investment protection agreement should contain at least the following provisions.
Når alt kommer til alt må langt de fleste investeringer jo komme fra erhvervslivet.
Fifthly, there must be a satisfactory rule for settling disputes.
Endelig, jeg går nu hurtigt frem, er det nødvendigt, at de administrative, tekniske og skattemæssige til tag gøres så enkle som overhovedet muligt og at den virksomhedsleder, som ønsker at investere, ikke står over for en form for forhindringsløb.
Finally, and moving on rapidly, administrative, technical and fiscal measures should be simplified as far as possible so that the head of a business wishing to invest should not be faced with a kind of assault course.
Det er grunden til, at jeg foreslår — eller henstiller — at disse stater i deres midte opretter nationale agenturer for investering og oprettelse af virksomheder, idet disse agenturer så skulle være det eneste sted, hvor virksomhedslederne kunne foretage alle de henvendelser, der vedrører disse spørgsmål.
That is why I am proposing — or suggesting — that those states should establish internally what I would describe as national investment and enterprise creation offices which would act as a single centre at which heads of companies could complete all the requisite formalities.
Det er også vigtigt, at medlemsstaterne anvender en mild ordning med hensyn til investeringer i Centralog Østeuropa. Medlemsstater, som har særlige faciliteter for investeringer i udviklingslande kunne også tilbyde disse faciliteter for investeringer i central- og østeuropæiske lande.
Investment protection agreements with Eastern European countries often provide for settlement by an arbitration tribunal.
Tyskland og Nederlandene gør f.eks. allerede dette.
In addition a European reinsurance policy, aimed at Eastern Europe, as a small step in the direction of a European credit insurance company is also a useful idea.
Endelig ser jeg ud fra Fællesskabets synspunkt to vigtige foranstaltninger eller to hovedretningslinjer.
Finally, from the point of view of the Community, I envisage two main measures or two main guiding principles.
Dels skal medlemsstaterne forsøge at harmonisere de forskellige garantiordninger, de iværksætter med henblik på eksport og investering.
On the one hand, the Member States should endeavour to harmonize the various systems of guarantee they apply for export and investment.
Dels skal der oprettes noget, jeg kalder et investeringsobservationsorgan, som ikke skal være en ny administration, men som kunne være det sted, hvor vi sammen med Kommissionen og Europa-Parlamentets kom petente udvalg kunne få et samlet overblik over, hvad der foregår af investeringer i disse lande, således at overbud mellem medlemsstaterne og en for stor spredning undgås.
Second, the setting-up of what I would describe as an investment monitoring office which would not be a new administration but an establishment which, in conjunction with the Commission and the relevant committees of the European Parliament, could provide us with a general view of investment being made in those countries in order to prevent the Member States vying with each other and too thin a sprinkling of resources.
Det er, hr. formand, hovedretningslinjerne i denne betænkning.
Those, Mr President, are the main points in the report.
En harmoniseret investeringsbeskyttelsesaftale bør minimalt indeholde følgende bestemmelser. For det første garantien for en ærlig og retfærdig behandling af investeringer; for det andet fuldstændig gensidig hed i behandlingen af investeringerne i de lande, som indgår aftalen; for det tredje fuldstændig skadesløsholdelse ved nationalisering; for det fjerde fri over førsel af penge — jeg har forståelse for, at værtslande vil hindre, at de bliver fuldstændig tømt af udenlandske investorer, men begrænsning af penge overførsel virker modsat og modarbejder blot hen sigten med investeringer.
RANDZIO-PLATH (S). — (DE) Mr President, Mr Benoit's proposal that an investment observation agency should be established in the European Community in connection with corresponding institutions at the level of the Eastern European countries is very intelligent and would preclude the dangers that have arisen with an agency of this kind at World Bank level.