natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg har i denne forbindelse fået forelagt en anmod­ning af Panella for gruppen for teknisk koordinering om at opføre dette valg på dagsordenen for mødepe­rioden i januar, selvom gruppeformændene her til formiddag med flertal vedtog, at dette spørgsmål skulle sættes på dagsordenen for torsdag i denne mødeperiode.
I have received a request from Mr Pannella, on behalf of the Group for the Technical Coordination and Defence of Independent· Groups and Members, for this election to be held during the January 1981 partsession whereas the Group chairmen decided this morning by a majority that this question would be placed on the agenda for Thursday of this partsession.
Hr. Coppieters har ordet for gruppen for teknisk koordinering og fosvar for uafhængige grupper og medlemmer.
I call Mr Coppieters to speak on behalf of the Group for the Technical Coordination and Defence of Independent Groups and Members.
Formanden. — Vi har diskuteret dette spørgsmål meget længe her til formiddag med gruppeformæn­dene i forbindelse med anvendelse af forretningsor­denen.
President. — We considered this matter at length this morning with the Group chairmen.
Vi har baseret os på protokollen fra sidste møde, hvor det blev anført, at Parlamentet ved afstemning havde vedtaget, at drøftelsen skulle finde sted uden forhandling.
We referred to the minutes of the last sitting where it is noted that, by one vote, Parliament decided that the discussion would take place without debate.
Man kan således hævde, at bestemmelserne i artikel 29 er opfyldt. løvrigt er forretningsordenen helt utvetydig.
We may therefore consider that Article 29 has been complied with.
Er der tale om anmodning om konstatering af beslutningsdygtighed kan proceduren gentages, men kun for afstemningens vedkommende, og man kan ikke genåbne forhand­lingen.
Furthermore, the Rules of Procedure are quite explicit where there has been a request for a quorum, the procedure will be resumed solely for the voting and the debate cannot be re-opened.
Vi må derfor idag, såsnart dette møde begynder, gå over til afstemning om forslag til beslut­ning samt de tre ændringsforslag.
We should therefore continue the voting on the motion for a resolution, together with the three amendments, from the begin ning of this sitting today.
Under de nuvæ­rende omstændigheder finder jeg det næsten selvind­lysende, at vi gør det, og det er derfor, at vor gruppe har fremsat denne anmodning.
In the circumstances I consider this perfectly normal and that is why our group has made its request.
Formanden. — Jeg sætter anmodningen fra gruppen for teknisk koordinering under afstemning.
President. — I put to the vote the request from the Group for Technical Coordination.
Anmodningen er forkastet.
The request is rejected.
Valget vil således finde sted under denne mødepe­riode.
The election will therefore take place during the present partsession.
Jeg foreslår, at man fastsætter ¡morgen kl. 18.00 som frist for indlevering af kandidaturer, og at dette valg sættes på dagsordenen for torsdag efter budgetaf­stemningen.
I propose that the deadline for nominating candidates for this post be fixed at 6 p.m. tomorrow and that the election be arranged for Thursday, after the vote on the budget.
For mig at se har vi bragt os selv i en ualmindelig pinlig situation ved at udsætte denne forhandling under det sidste møde til så sent et tidspunkt, at vi ikke længere var beslutningsdygtige — som jeg jo netop forudså, da jeg på dette tidspunkt under den sidste mødeperiode bad Dem om at sætte det tidligere på.
It does seem to me that we have got ourselves into an extremely awkward situation here by putting this debate at the last session so late that we ran out of a quorum, which is exactly what I anticipated when I asked you at this point in the last session to put it in earlier.
Jeg finder det helt uacceptabelt, at vi i denne usædvanlige vigtige sag skal stå i en situation, hvor vi må stemme om alt eller intet.
It seems to me quite intolerable on this enormously important issue that we should be faced with the position that we either vote the whole thing or nothing at all.
Dette er en sag mellem Fællesskabet og to­tredjedele af verdens befolkning.
This is something between the Community and twothirds of the world's population.
Det er så helt afgørende vigtigt, at vi kan give udtryk for vor opfattelse, og det kan vi kun gøre på én måde, nemlig ved at stemme om disse ændrings­forslag, så jeg vil gerne stærkt støtte hvad De netop har foreslået.
It is enormously important that we put our opinions in and the only way of doing that is to vote these amendments so I most strongly support what you have just suggested.
Det er vedtaget.
Are there any objections?
Jeg ønsker blot at føre til protokols, at jeg ikke deler denne opfattelse.
I simply wish to put on record that I did not share this view.
Og jeg kan slet ikke, som alle ved, være med til denne fortolkning af forretningsordenen. ι
As you know, I definitely do not endorse this interpretation of the Rules of Procedure.
På sit møde den 20. november 1980 har det udvidede præsidium udarbejdet det forslag til dagsorden, der er omdelt (PE 69.850/ændr.).
Mrs Kellett-Bowman. — Madam President, on the Friday morning of the last partsession I did, in fact, raise this precise point and was assured by the Chair that it was possible to vote on these particular amend ments.
Fru formand, jeg vil også gerne støtte den linje, De agter at lægge her.
Mr Pearce. — Madam President, I also strongly support the line you propose to take on this.
Det synes at være den bedste løsning på de vanskeligheder, vi står over for lige nu.
It seems to be the best way out of the difficulties in which we find ourselves at the moment.
Fru formand, det er muligt, at der skete en lille fejl ved oversættelsen, men De sagde, at vi skal behandle tre ændringsforslag.
It may be, Madam President, that the translation got it a little bit wrong, but you did say that there are three amendments to go.
Såvidt jeg husker er vi nået igennem de første fire punkter i denne betænkning, og da to af ændringsforslagene var til punkt fire, betyder det at vi har været igennem to af de fire ændringsforslag, der var fremsat, og at vi har to ændringsforslag tilbage til resten af betænkningen.
My recollection is that we have disposed of the first four paragraphs of this report, and as two of the amendments were on paragraph 4, this means that we have dealt with two of the four amendments tabled and have two amendments left on the remainder of the report.
Her foreligger adskillige ændringsforslag, og det hele er blevet udsat fra november måned.
Mr Dankert. — (NL) I have a problem as regards Item 260.
Mødet mandag den 15. december 1980 under ét med nr. 259, betænkningen af Gatto; der er ingen forbindelse overhovedet mellem de to betænk ninger, måske bortset fra ordet Grækenland, men det er vel ingen grund til at behandle de to betænkninger under ét.
I would also ask you to place the report somewhat later on the agenda as the discussion will otherwise coincide with the meeting of the Committee on Budgets and I shall be unable to attend.
Formanden. — For det første vedtog man på hr. Scott Hopkins's anmodning at foretage en afstemning uden forhandling, uden af den grund at give afkald på ændringsforslagene, som der rent faktisk er to af og for det andet fordi der forelægger en anmodning om konstatering af beslutningsdygtighed, bør man gå over til afstemning; her er forretningsordenen ganske klar.
President. — On the one hand, at the request of Mr Scott-Hopkins, it was decided to vote without debate without, however, dropping the amendments, of which two, indeed, remain.
Jeg vil endnu en gang anmode Dem om at anbringe betænkningen senere på dagsordenen, dog således at den ikke falder sammen med mødet i budgetudvalget, som jeg i øvrigt heller ikke kan deltage i i dag.
On the other hand, where there has been a request for a quorum, a vote must be taken; the Rules of Procedure are absolutely clear on this.
Det vil altså sige umiddelbart efter afstemningen eller sidst på dagen, ellers vil det blive meget vanskeligt for mig.
Perhaps the report could be taken immediately after the votes or at the end of this day's sitting, otherwise it will be extremely difficult for me to be present.
Jeg trot ikke, at hele betænkningen vil lægge beslag på mere end 10 minutter.
I would imagine that the whole report could be dealt with in ten minutes.
Formanden. — Vi vil behandle de to betænkninger hver for sig og vil først behandle Deres ved mødets slutning, før spørgetiden.
President. — We shall deal with these two reports· separately and take yours at the end of the sitting, before Question Time.
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg det som vedtaget.
Are there any objections?
Det er vedtaget.
That is agreed.
Mén jeg vil imidlertid være Dem taknemlig, om man kunne tage dette problem op i det udvidede præsidium.
However, I should be grateful if this problem were examined by the enlarged Bureau.
Enten gælder artikel 29, stk 1, ikke mere eller — da det på den pågældende fredag kom til kampafstemning og nogle af medlemmerne var imod, at dette blev vedtaget uden forhandling — eller også kan artikel 29, stk 1, tredje linje ophæves, det vil sige at der kan stemmes om ændringsforslag, uden at de begrundes under forhandlingen.
Either Article 29, paragraph 1 will not apply anymore in future, or — since on that Friday a contested vote took place and some of the parliamentarians were against the adoption of this decision without a debate — subparagraph 3 of Article 29, paragraph 1, could be suspended, with the result that amendments shall all the same be voted on, without debate.
(Bifald fra forskellige pladser)
(Applause from certain quarters)
Formanden. — Her har vi en af de mange modsigelser i forretningsordenen. Ifølge artikel 29 fremgår det klart, at ændringsforslagene »doivent être soutenus».
President. — This is one of the many contradictions in the Rules of Procedure: Rule 29 provides that amendments must be moved.
Formuleringen er, i hvert fald på fransk, ganske givet upræcis.
The wording, in French at least, could certainly be clearer.
På den anden side giver forretningsordenen mulighed for en afstemning uden forhandling uden at oplyse, hvorvidt ændringsforslagene så falder.
On the other hand, the Rules allow for a vote without debate without indicating whether, in that case, the amendments are dropped.
Det er endnu et punkt, som udvalget for forretningsordenen og andragender må belyse.
This is yet another point that will have to be clarified by the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions.
Sir Henry Plumb, Formand for landbrugsudvalget. — (en.) Jeg har et problem, fru formand.
Sir Henry Plumb, chairman of the Committee on Agriculture. — I have a problem, Madam President.
Jeg er klar over, at De har modtaget en særlig anmodning fra Rådet om uopsættelig behandling i overensstemmelse med artikel 14 i forretningsordenen, i forbindelse med tre dokumenter — et om isoglucose, et om eksportrefusion for korn til fremstilling af whisky, og et om sukker.
I am aware that you have received a special request from the Council for urgent debate, on the basis of Rule 14 of the Rules of Procedure, on three documents — one on isoglucose, one on the export refunds for cereals used in the manufacture of whisky and one on sugar.
Fru formand, en af mine meget gode venner er afgået ved døden, og jeg bliver desværre nødt til at tage tilbage til England i morgen, og jeg kan forstå, at De vil behandle spørgsmålet om uopsættelighed i forbindelse med disse betænkninger i morgen formiddag.
Unfortunately, Madam President, owing to the death of a good friend of mine I have to return to England tomorrow, and I understand that you are going to discuss the question of urgency in respect of these reports tomorrow morning.
Jeg vil derfor gerne spørge Dem, om De vil tillade, at jeg som formand for landbrugsudvalget gør rede for udvalgets holdning til disse ting på dets sidste møde.
I would like to ask you whether you would allow me, as chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, to state the position taken by the committee on these matters at its last meeting.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
Debates of the European Parliament amendments to the report by the parliamentary committees and to the motions for resolutions be fixed at 11 a.m. tomorrow.
Formanden udvalget få lejlighed til at afgive sin udtalelse, og medlemmerne kan i deres stemmeafgivning tage hensyn hertil.
President. — It is when the decision is taken on urgency that you must make known your opinion, Sir Henry.
— af Brøndlund Nielsen for landbrugsudvalget om anvendelse af stoffer med normal eller thyroestatisk virkning på husdyr,
If you cannot do so yourself, this will have to be done by a vicechairman of your committee.
— af Kirk for landbrugsudvalget om fartøjer, der udøver fiskeri i det regulerede område, der er defineret i NAFO-konventionen,
As regards the votes, I propose that these texts be voted on at the end of the debate; the other votes will be taken at the normal time, 3 p.m.
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg det som vedtaget.
I have received requests for urgent debate from the Council concerning proposals for isoglucose (Doc.
— af Goutier for landbrugsudvalget om en fælles markedsordning i sektoren for fiskeprodukter,
1-700/80) and the common organization of the market in fishery products (Doc. 1-635/80).
er ikke blevet vedtaget i udvalget og tages af dagsordenen. denen.
I shall consult Parliament on these requests tomorrow morning.
Jeg har modtaget en række anmodninger om uopsættelig forhandling i overensstemmelse med artikel 14 i forretningsordenen, alle vedrørende jordskælvet i Italien (').
Mr Vernimmen. — (NL) I would ask Parliament to return early tomorrow to the point made by Sir Henry Plumb since, to my mind, a very important decision was taken in the Committee on Agriculture, i.e. the decision that these matters would not be treated as urgent: the Committee took a clear decision on that point and consequently — if the work of that Committee and of Parliament is to be treated seriously — respect must be shown for the decision taken by the Committee on Agriculture.
Det er blevet mig meddelt, at de kompetente udvalg sandsynligvis vil vedtage deres betænkninger i aften, således at dokumenterne kan foreligge i morgen.
President. — The requests for urgent debate will be taken when the relevant documents have been distributed.
Jeg foreslår derfor, at vi nu fastsætter fristen for indlevering af ændringsforslag til forslaget til tillægsbudget til kl. 18 i aften, og fristen for indlevering af ændringsforslag til udvalgenes betænkninger over forslag til beslutning til i morgen kl. 2.
The Committee on Agriculture will then be able to make known its points of view and the Members will be able to take account of it in their vote. The following reports have not been adopted in committee and have therefore been withdrawn from the agenda :
Med hensyn til afstemningerne foreslår jeg, at disse dokumenter sættes under afstemning ved forhandlingens slutning, medens de andre afsteminger normalt skulle finde sted kl. 15.
— report by Mr Nielsen, on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, on the use of hormones in domestic animals
Det et sådan, at denne betænkning godkender de forslag fra Kommissionen, som blev opgivet under drøftelserne i sidste uge mellem Rådet og den græske regering.
With the agreement of the chairmen of the political groups, I propose that the deadline for tabling these motions for resolutions be fixed at 6 p.m. on Tuesday, 16 December.
Der er således intet formål med denne betænkning.
— report by Mr Kirk, on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, on catch quotas for fish
Og hvis vi ikke behandler den under denne mødeperiode, handler vi helt i overensstemmelse med hr. Gattos konklusioner, idet han beklagede, at de græske parlamentsmedlemmer ikke kunne deltage i denne debat.
— report by Mr Kirk, on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, on vessels fishing in the regulatory area defined in the NAFO Convention
Jeg finder det således højst forbavsende, at vi skal drøfte godkendelsen af forslagene fra Kommissionen, forslag, som jo nu er ugyldige, eftersom Ministerrådet har opgivet dem.
The vote on urgency would be taken on Wednesday morning and the text would be debated jointly with the statements by the Council and Commission, also scheduled for Wednesday, while the vote on the motions for resolutions would be taken immediately after the debate.
Vi har fået at vide, at der nu til aften vil blive indgået en aftale mellem Rådet og den græske regering. Det har vi intet endeligt og officielt kendskab til.
— report by Mr Gautier, on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, on the common organization of the market in fishery products.
Jeg vil høre Parlamentet om disse anmodninger om uopsættelighed i morgen formiddag.
I have received a number of requests for urgent debate pursuant to Rule 14 of the Rules of Procedure, all relating to the earthquake in Italy.*
Hvis uopsætteligheden vedtages, kan disse punkter optages på dagsordenen på fredag, og Iristen for indlevering af ændringsforslag kan fastsættes til torsdag kl. 12.
By virtue of the powers conferred upon me by Rule 12 of the Rules of Procedure, I propose that all these texts be included in a single joint debate on the agenda for tomorrow's sitting, within the framework of the budgetary debate.
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg det som vedtaget; Det er vedtaget.
Are there any objections?
Jeg vil gerne sige, at dette ikke er sandt, fordi der i Rådet af landbrugsministre stadig ligger forslag, som vi har fremsat, og når der i dag har været diskussion, skyldes det, at Komissionen fastholder sine egne forslag.
The report therefore no longer has any purpose. In line with the conclusions reached by Mr Gatto who regretted that the Greek Members could not be present to take part in the debate the report should surely not be discussed during this partsession.
Jeg vil gerne tilføje, at Rådet af landbrugsministre holder møde næste torsdag for at godkende disse forslag, som er nødvendige, hvis den fælles landbrugspolitik skal kunne træde i kraft 1. januar 1981.
I am therefore extremely surprised to find us being asked to approve Commission proposals which are now obsolete since the Council of Ministers has abandoned
Fru formand, af de sædvanlige grunde kan vi ikke være enige i denne fordeling.
We are told that an agreement was reached last night between the Council and the Greek Govern ment.
Det har jeg allerede meddelt det udvidede præsidium og formandsudvalget.
But we have no definitive official information on that point.
Endvidere, fru formand, ønsker jeg, at forhandlingen om jordskælvet i Italien ikke, ikke det, i det mindste, styres af artikel 28, som man plejer her, det vil sige for hele dagen.
Therefore, since the Commission's proposals have been superseded and since also the Greek Members will be present during the next partsession, I would hope — and I am making this request on behalf of the rapporteur — that the report by Mr Gatto should be held over to our next partsession.
Jeg er altså imod den foreslåede fordeling, ikke blot af de sædvanlige grunde, men fordi jeg finder, at den sædvanlige fortolkning, i forbindelse med forhand­lingen om jordskælvet i Italien — dvs. hele dagen — af artikel 28 ville være skæbnesvanger for Parla­mentet:
Having consulted the chairmen of the political groups, I propose that the following reports be included at the end of the agenda for Friday:
Formanden. — Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg det som vedtaget.
— Report by Mr Louwes on tariff quotas for beef and veal and buffalo meat (without debate)
Sir Henry Plumb, formand for landbrugsudvalget. — (en.) Fru formand, det var udvalgets ønske, at denne betænkning skulle behandles i Parlamentet nu.
— Report by Mr Beumer on taxes on the consumption of manufactured tobacco (without debate)
Efter aftale med formændene for de politiske grupper foreslår jeg, at følgende punkter optages på dagsor­denen for fredag:
That is not strictly speaking correct because our proposals are still pending in the Council of Ministers of Agriculture and if the Council has discussed them it did so precisely because the Commission maintained its proposals.
Formanden. — Jeg foreslår, at fristerne for at stille ændringsforslag under denne mødeperiode fastsættes som anført i forslaget til dagsorden, og til torsdag kl. 12 for de punkter, der er blevet tilføjet dagsordenen.
I would add that the Council of Ministers of Agriculture will be meeting next Thursday to approve these proposals which are vital if the common agricultural policy is to enter into force on 1 January 1981.
■*— betænkning af Beumer om forbrugsafgifter forarbejdet tobak (uden forhandling)
President. — I call Mr Klepsch to speak on behalf of the European People's Party (CD Group).
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg det som vedtaget.
President. — I propose that speaking time be allocated as indicated in the draft agenda, subject to adjustments necessitated ' by any alterations to the agenda.
Det er vedtaget.
I call Mr Pannella.
— betænkning af Cottrell om forbindelserne mellem Grækenland og Fællesskabet på transportområdet.
Mr Klepsch. — (D) Madam President, we have now heard that the reason for withdrawing this item from the agenda -does not in fact exist; the reason given Mr Sutra was that the Commission's proposals had now been overtaken by events. That is not the case.
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg det som vedtaget.
I have already informed the enlarged Bureau and the Committee of Chairmen to that fact.
Hermed er arbejdsplanen fastsat (
President. — I call Sir Henry Plumb.
Formanden. — Protokollen indeholder titlerne på de af Kommissionens forslag til Rådet, der er anført på dagsordenen til dette møde, og som skal behandles ifølge proceduren uden afgivelse af betænkning i henhold til artikel 27a i forretningsordenen.
I therefore oppose the proposed distribution, not only for the usual reasons but also because I consider that in the particular instance of the debate about the Italian earthquake, the application of Rule 28 in the normal manner — i.e. for the whole day — would be detrimental to the interests of this Parliament.
Hvis jeg ikke, inden mødet åbner på fredag, har modtaget anmodning fra medlemmerne om tilladelse til at tale, eller der ikke er stillet ændringsforslag, vil jeg erklære disse forslag for vedtaget.
Sir Henry Plumb, chairman of the Committee on Agriculture. — Madam President, the opinion of the committee was that this report should be placed before the House on this occasion.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er meddelelse fra Kommissionen om dens reaktion på Parlamentets udtalelser og forslag (')·
from the Commission on action taken on the opinions and resolutions of the European Parliament.*
(Punkt 5 vedtoges)
I call Sir Henry Plumb.
Til punkt 6 har Sir Frederic Catherwood m.fl. stillet ændringsforslag nr. 1 om, at dette punkt udgår og erstattes af et nyt punkt med følgende ordlyd:
Sir Henry Plumb. — Madam President, I have now discussed the Gatto report with Mr Sutra, and I wish to inform you that the report will stand before the House.
Kan kommissionsmedlemmet meddele mig, hvornår vi kan forvente dene beretning?
Can the Commissioner tell me when we may expect that report?
Hvis dette punkt ikke findes i pågældende dokument, er jeg selvfølgelig forhindret i at give et umiddelbart svar til hr. Coppieters, et svar som jeg vil tilsende ham senere.
If it is not so covered, I shall clearly be unable to give an immediate answer to Mr Coppieters but the answer will be forwarded to him later.
Når man tager diskutionen af netop dette punkt i Rådet af transportministre den 4. december i betragtning, et møde som gik i hårdknude på grund af et par enkelte medlemmers synspunkter, og eftersom det skal tages op igen — så vidt jeg ved i marts —, mener jeg, at dette punkt bør understreges.
In view of the fact that the discussion on this particular item in the Transport Council on 4 December was deadlocked because of the view of one or two members, and since it is going to be discussed again — I understand in March — I think that point should be made clear.
Fru formand, jeg tror igen, at udvalget ville gå imod dette ændringsforslag.
President. — A number of voting cards have not yet been collected from the secretariat.