natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen har fuld forståelse for argumenterne til forsvar af vinsektoren, men er alvorligt bekymret for sektoren med hensyn til såvel udviklingen i produktionen som de budgetmæssige aspekter.
In the 1970s 78 million hectolitres were distilled on average, whereas in the first four years of the 1980s approximately 17 million hectolitres have been distilled and the forecasts for 1983-84 indicate a further increase.
Jeg skal ikke gå i detaljer, men blot nævne en af de ting, ordføreren kommer ind på. Jeg vil henholde mig til udviklingen i de destillerede mængder vin og i udgifterne.
In the 1970s the wine budget was often below 100 million ECU, while in the last four years it has been about 500 million ECU.
I 1970erne lå vinbudgettet ofte under 100 mio ECU, mens det i de seneste fire år har været på ca. 500 mio ECU, og for 1984 er der på budgettet afsat ca. 588 mio ECU, hvilket sandsynligvis er utilstrækkeligt.
For 1984 approximately 588 million ECU has been earmarked, and in all probability even that will not be sufficient.
Det er på denne baggrund, at Kommissionen foreslår, at der føres nøje kontrol med nedbringelse af overskud dene og dermed begrænsning af udgifterne, og Kommissionen er overbevist om, at den foreslåede nye ordning vil gøre det muligt at opnå en bedre og varig sanering af vinmarkedet.
It is against this background that the Commission proposes that close checks be carried out aimed at reducing surpluses and thereby limiting expenditure, and the Commission is convinced that the proposed new organization will make it possible to arrive at a better and lasting reorganization of the market in wine, which will also be of great benefit to the wine producers.
Også det vil være til gavn for vindyrkerne.
It is against this background that I oppose the amend ments proposed by the rapporteur.
På denne baggrund er jeg imod de ændringer, ordfø reren foreslår.
We also ask for a minimum price to be actually applied in intraCommunity trade.
Vi kræver desuden en minimumspris, der skal forvaltes effektivt for handel inden for Fællesskabet.
Mr Simmonds (ED), deputy rapporteur. — Madam President, I am asked to convey to the House the apologies of Mr Hord, who is unable to be here this after noon.
Afstemningen finder sted i næste afstemningstid.
We ask for rules which apply to all winegrowers and distributors.
Selv i dag er vi ikke i stand til at kontrollere, at forordningen overholdes, hr. Dalsager, fordi vi indtil dags dato ikke har nogen forordning om kontrol på dette punkt.
Simmonds this afternoon, because I believe that this is a classic example of an own-initiative report which is of very considerable value in this House.
Det glæder mig meget at tale om denne betænkning på hans vegne.
Something which is very often decried.
Hvad gør landbrugsudvalget så?
should be on open sale.
Men vort problem var, at medicinalmarkedet ikke er kontrol lerbart.
But our problem was the impossibility of controlling the drugs market.
Hr. Hord kunne opfordret af mig i land brugsudvalget, til at nævnte mig et lægemiddel, som burde sælges frit, ikke nævnte mig noget.
In the Committee on Agriculture I asked Mr Hord to name a drug which should be on free sale, but he could not name one.
Ej heller de andre kolleger i landbrugsudvalget kunne nævne mig et lægemiddel, og eftersom hr. Simmonds med stor sagkundskab repræsenterer hr. Hord, vil jeg gerne spørge ham i hans egenskab af ordfører, hvilke af disse profylaktiske midler til masseanvendelse, der er nævnt i punkt 7, det skulle være, som kunne sælges frit.
The other members of the Committee on Agriculture could not name one either, and since Mr Simmonds is standing in for Mr Hord so expertly, I should like to ask them in his capacity as rapporteur to tell me what these massuse prophylactics are which are referred to in paragraph 7 as being safe for general sale.
Jeg har ikke til hensigt at tale i lang tid, for betænkningens begrundelse er yderst klar, og jeg mener, at den giver et ganske godt billede af problemet.
I do not propose to speak at any great length. The explanatory statement is extremely clear, and I think it provides a thorough background to the problem.
Selv om betænkningen er udarbejdet på eget initiativ, er den resultatet af generel bekymring over, at misbruget af veterinærmedicinske præparater hovedsagelig skyldes en manglende kontrol af distributionsnettet i de fleste medlemsstater.
Although the report is an own-initiative one, it follows on from considerable concern that abuse of animal health drugs is principally due to a lack of any coherent system of control of distribution in most of the Member States.
Det er almindeligt kendt, at der eksisterer et sort marked for veterinærmedicinske produkter og præparater, og at denne sortbørshandel er ret udbredt i Fællesskabet.
It is common knowledge that a black market exists in animal health products and drugs and that those black markets are common and widespread throughout the Community.
Vi mener, at anvendelsen af veterinærmedicinske præparater i landbruget skal indskrænkes til det allermest nødvendige.
We hold the view that the use of veterinary medicines in agriculture must be limited to what is absolutely necessary.
Vi mener dette af flere forskellige grunde, også af helbredsgrunde, f.eks. for at beskytte forbrugeren mod udbredelse af resistens over for antibiotika eller lignende.
We hold this view for various reasons, including reasons of health, for example for the protection of consumers against the spread of resistance to antibiotics and the like.
Vi vil have den profylaktiske behandling indskrænket til et minimum, og dette kan kun sikres ved, at dyrlægerne får pligt til at godkende behandlingen.
We want to reduce prophylactic treatments to a minimum, and this can only be done by imposing an obligation to obtain veterinary authorization.
Dette er den eneste måde til at blokere det grå marked på og til at forhindre ukyndig anvendelse af lægemidler.
This is the only way to put a stop to the grey market and to prevent the improper use of drugs.
Derudover mener jeg, at hormonskrækken fra omkring tre år siden tvinger Fællesskabet til at frem sætte et forslag om og indføre et fælles system for distribution af præparater.
Further, I believe that the hormone scare of some three years ago obliges the Community to bring forward a proposal and an agreed system for distribution of drugs.
Afsnit 5 i betænkningen opfører de fire distributionskategorier, som man alle rede i nogen tid har opereret med i Det forenede Kongerige.
In paragraph 5 of the report there are set out the four categories for distribution, and these categories have been successfully operated for some time already in the United Kingdom.
Det ser heldigvis ud til, at de også vil blive indført i resten af Fællesskabet.
I believe that there are, sensibly, good prospects that they will be extended to the rest of the Community.
Der er et behov for en passende kontrol med produkter på recept udøvet af dyrlæger og apotekere.
There is a need for proper supervision by vets and pharmacists of products which require careful prescription.
Men det må gøres helt klart, at dette forslag ikke går ud på øget bureaukrati for bureaukratiets skyld.
But let nobody misunderstand this proposal as being a prop osal for bureaucracy for bureaucracy's sake.
Langt de fleste veterinærmedicinske præparater kan stadig fås i håndkøb.
The over whelming majority of veterinary products can still be made available for general sale.
Derfor forsøger vi blot i denne betænkning at frem sætte forslag om de mere betænkelige præparater og om de præparater, der kan føre til restkoncentrationer, når landbrugsprodukterne, i form af kød f.eks., senere indtages af mennesker.
That is why we merely seek in this report to make proposals for the more dangerous drugs or for those drugs which can have residue effects when the products by way of meats, and so on, are consumed subsequently by humans.
Det er mig derfor, fru formand, en ære på hr. Hords vegne at forelægge denne betænkning for Parlamentet. mentet.
Accordingly, Madam President, it is a great honour for me on Mr Hord's behalf to commend this report to the House.
Dalsager, medlem af Kommissionen. — Fru formand, jeg har med interesse læst betænkningen af hr. Hord om tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om veterinærmedicinske præparater, og det er mig klart, at vi her har at gøre med et område, hvor det er meget vanskeligt at formulere fælles principper for sikkerhedsbestemmelser og for den kontrol, som hører hertil.
Mr Dalsager, Member of the Commission. — (DA) Madam President, I was interested to read Mr Hord's report on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the distribution of veterinary medicine, and it is clear to me that we are dealing with a subject on which it is very difficult to formulate common principles for safety provisions and for the type of control required.
På den anden side må jeg erkende, at der bør indføres mere ensartede regler i Fællesskabet.
On the other hand, I must admit that more uniform rules must be introduced in the Community.
Jeg kan derfor støtte de principper, man er blevet enig om i den foreliggende betænkning, om end jeg må tage forbehold på visse punkter, hvor vi i Kommissionen må have lidt mere tid til at foretage de nødvendige tekniske og formelle overvejelser.
I am therefore able to support the principles which have been agreed upon in this report, even though I have to express reservations on certain points because the Commission must have a bit more time to think about the technical and formal aspects.
Gautier (S). — (DE) Fru formand, mine kære kolleger, jeg vil stemme imod denne betænkning!
Mr Gautier (S). — (DE) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, I shall vote against this report.
Det er et vældig fint dokument fra landbrugsudvalget, men det er typisk for det udvalg, som vi alle holder så meget af.
It is a charming document produced by the Committee on Agriculture, but it is not untypical of the committee which is so dear to all our hearts.
Vi havde for nogle år siden den berømte skandale med hormoner i kalvekød.
It was in the form of a proposal for a Council Directive.
Hvor lå problemet?
A few years ago we had the famous scandal of hormones in veal.
Der var mennesker, som benyttede ulovlige væksthormoner, og Fællesskabet var ikke i stand til at kontrol lere dette.
What was the problem ? There were people making illegal use of fattening aids, and the Community was unable to control it.
Nu har Det europæiske Fællesskab udstedt
Now the Euorpean Community has issued a splendid regulation forbidding the use of artifical hormones as a fattening aid.
Jeg skal samtidig gøre opmærksom på, at Kommissionen allerede har udarbejdet et forslag på dette område, nemlig om udlevering og brug af medicineret foder.
This applies to both preventive and curative medicine and in particular, to domestic animals producing food, where we believe there are special reasons for setting up comprehensive medical controls.
Det er sket i form af et forslag til et direktiv fra Rådet.
What is the Committee on Agriculture now doing ?
Det er Kommissionens mening, at man hermed har dækket et vigtigt område af de veterinær medicinske præparater, idet medicin i stigende grad indgives husdyrene med foderet.
It is standing up bravely and saying in paragraph 7 — Mr Simmonds has kindly repeated it, and Mr Hord also agrees — that all sorts of medicines exist as massuse prophylactics, routine treatments, etc. which
Dalsager at der er særlig grund til at udbygge en omfattende medicinkontrol.
Dalsager of consumers' wishes for better controls on foodstuffs for their antibiotic or hormone content, for example, which are only some of the substances currently under debate.
over meddelelse fra Kommissionen til Rådet (KOM(79) 261 endel.) vedførende de større problemer i forbindelse med forslagene til direktiv fra Rådet om harmonisering af strukturen i andre forbrugsafgifter end moms på øl, vin og alkohol.
communication to the Council (COM(79)261 final) concerning the major problems relating to the proposed Council directives to harmonize the structures of consumer taxes, other than VAT, on beer, wine and alcohol.
Kommissionen er af den opfattelse, at man hermed på én gang fremmer muligheden for systematisk behandling af husdyr til gavn for husdyrejeren og samtidig tager hensyn til forbrugernes ønsker om bedre kontrol med levnedsmidler for indhold af f.eks. antibiotika og hormoner, for blot at tage nogle af de substanser der indgår i debatten i øjeblikket.
The Commission considers that this report reflects Parliament's wishes for work to be continued in this field, which is a view shared by the Commission. We shall examine the technical and formal problems in my department, and it is my hope that we shall be able to utilize the results in the ongoing work in this field.
Ligios (PPE), ordfører. — (IT) Fru formand, jeg skal erindre om, at jeg allerede tidligere har forelagt min betænkning for Parlamentet, men at den blev henvist til fornyet udvalgsbehandling, fordi man på en bestemt dag i den forrige mødeperiode fik konstateret, at det krævede antal medlemmer ikke var til stede.
Mr Ligios (PPE), rapporteur. — (IT) Madam President, I must remind you that when I presented my report to Parliament I had already spoken and that it was referred back to Committee because a quorum was called for on a certain day in the last session.
Jeg har ikke noget at tilføje til det, jeg sagde dengang.
Therefore I shall not add anything to what I said then.
Kommissionen tager den foreliggende betænkning som et udtryk for Parlamentets ønske om at fremme arbejdet på dette område, et ønske som Kommissionen deler. Vi skal tage de tekniske og formelle problemer op mine tjenestegrene, og det er mit håb, at vi kan udnytte resultaterne i det igangværende arbejde på dette område.
As for Mr Hopper's report — which I was opposed to and whose content I criticized and which was also referred back to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs it has been altered and I agree fully with it in its present form.
I øvrigt er jeg også enig i udtalelsen fra landbrugsudvalget, som jo er en bekræftelse af de indvendinger, jeg fremsatte imod betænkningen.
Furthermore I agree with the Committee on Agriculture's opinion which supports my objections to the report.
Simmonds (ED), stedfortrædende ordfører. — (EN) Fru formand, jeg fik stillet et konkret spørgsmål af hr. Gautier.
Mr Simmonds (ED), deputy rapporteur. — Madam President, I was asked a specific question by Mr Gautier.
Jeg ved ikke m.h.t. den tyske oversættelse, men hvis han ser på afsnit 5, vil han se, at vi kræver, at kontrollen med distribution af veterinærmedicinske produkter bør tage udgangspunkt i en klassificering af disse produkter alt efter, under hvilken af de fire kategorier de sælges.
I am not quite sure of the translation into German. If he would refer to paragraph 5, he will see that we have asked that the control of the distribution of drugs should start with a classification of various drugs, to determine under which of the four listed headings drugs should be generally available.
Jeg kan fortælle ham, at de bestemmelser, man har i Det forenede Kongerige, er meget strengere end i de fleste andre europæiske lande. For eksempel kan jeg ikke give mine køer antibiotika uden recept.
I would like to tell him that the system as operated in the United Kingdom is much tighter than that in most other European countries.
Jeg kan forsikre hr. Gautier om, at vi forsøger at skærpe kontrollen med distribution af farlige præparater, og at vi mener, at der er brug for mere forskning af almindelige foderlægemidler.
I should like to reassure Mr Gautier that we are trying to tighten up systems of distribution for dangerous drugs and that we believe more research is required into the classification of general farm drugs.
Hvad angår samtlige de ændringsforslag, der er blevet fremsat — ganske kort, da jeg nu har ordet — ændrer de efter min mening ikke noget ved den gene relle tendens i betænkningen bortset fra ét, som man dog netop i dette øjeblik har meddelt mig lader til at være blevet trukket tilbage — jeg mener, det er nr. 10 — og som jeg meget ville have modsat mig, fordi det ville have fået til følge at det, som økonomi- og valutaudvalget netop har fået slettet, ville være blevet indføjet igen.
As far as the amendments — seeing that it is my turn to speak — I think that all those which have been presented only alter one point in the report and I have just been told that it is to be withdrawn — Number 10 I believe — which I would most definitely have opposed because it would simply re-introduce what the Committee on Economics and Monetary Affairs had just eliminated.
Gautier (S). — (DE) Hr. Simmonds, jeg henviste til punkt 7 i forslaget til beslutning, hvor der står:
Mr Gautier (S). — Mr Simmonds, I was referring to paragraph 7 of the motion for a resolution where it states :
. . . erkender, at der eksisterer en række bredt anvendelige forebyggende midler, som risikofrit kan sælges og udleveres.
Accepts that there exists a range of massuse prophylactics ... which are safe for general sale.
Det er det hele!
No more than that !
Simmonds (ED), stedfortrædende ordfører. — (EN) Jeg mener ikke, at jeg ifølge afsnit 7 skal have en recept for at kunne give mine køer plaster på.
Mr Simmonds (ED), deputy rapporteur. — I do not think that under paragraph 7 I have to have a prescription for the application of sticking plasters to my cows.
Det er et eksempel på en vare, der sælges af min lokale forhandler af veterinærmedicinske præparater, og hvis anvendelse jeg ikke mener skal være receptpligtig.
That is an example of one thing which is sold by my local agricultural chemist for application to animals. So that is one chemical application which I would not be campaigning to have made available under prescription only.
Harmonisering af forbrugsafgifterne
Harmonization of consumer tax structures
1-48/84) af Ligios for landbrugsudvalget om vinafgifter
1-48/84) by Mr Ligios, on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, on the taxation on wine ;
W. J. Hopper (ED). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil godt have lov til at sige, og særlig til hr. Ligios, hvor meget det glæder mig, at hans og min betænkning tages under ét her.
Mr Hopper (ED), rapporteur. — Madam President, may I say, particularly to Mr Ligios, how pleased I am that both his report and mine are being taken together here.
Dette understreger den fælles inter esse, som alle producenter og forbrugere af alle former for alkoholholdige drikke har i at få oprettet et fælles marked for disse drikkevarer.
This stresses the common interest of all producers and consumers of all kinds of alcoholic beverages in establishing a common market in those beverages.
Jeg er også yderst glad for, at dette emne er dukket op så kort tid før det direkte valg til Europa-Parlamentet.
I am also exceedingly pleased that the subject is coming up so shortly before the European elections.
Dette er en af Fællesskabets solstrålehistorier, hvilket jeg ikke ville have troet muligt for blot en måned siden; men siden da er det britiske finanslovforslag blevet fremsat, og i dette har den britiske regering efter kommet Domstolens dom og har bragt beskatningen af vin, øl og cider i orden.
This is one of the success stories of the European Community. This is something I would not have said a month ago, but in the last month we have seen the British budget, and in the British budget the British Government has complied with the ruling of the European Court of Justice and has brought the taxation of wine, beer and cider into line.
Det er ikke altsammen sket uden besvær.
This has not been done altogether without pain.
Jeg vil gøre Dem opmærksom på, at afgiften på cider er blevet tredoblet i Det forenede Kongerige.
I would draw your attention to the fact that in the United Kingdom the tax on cider has been tripled.
Jeg vil bede hr. Ligios, om han venligst, måske lidt senere i debatten, ville forklare mig, hvorfor han anser den britiske økonomi- og finansministers handling som et første skridt.
I would like to ask Mr Ligios if he would kindly, perhaps a little later in the debate, explain to me why he regards the action of the British Chancellor as the first step.
Jeg har forstået fra mine venner i Kommissionen, at de mener, at den britiske regering fuldt ud har efterkommet Domstolens dom.
I understand from my friends in the European Commission that they believe that the British Government has complied fully with the ruling of the Court of Justice.
Her til morgen fik vi gode nyheder fra Rom, da vi hørte, at afgiften på skotsk whisky i Italien vil blive halveret.
This morning there was good news from Rome. I hear that the tax on Scotch whisky in Italy is to be halved.
1-49/84) af Hopper for økonomi- og valutaudvalget
1-49/84) by Mr Hopper, on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, on the
Jeg vil gerne kort gøre det klart, hvorfor jeg anser denne betænkning for så vigtig.
Allow me to explain briefly why I think this report is so important.
Det er virkelig uforklarligt, hvorfor i nogle medlemsstater cognac, og i andre whisky beskattes meget stærkt og hvorfor i nogle lande øl og i andre vin.
It is really unfathomable why some Member States impose high rates of tax on cognac, others on whisky, others on beer, and others still on wine.
Man forsøger her at betegne det ene eller andet produkt, som en luksusvare og at spille det ud mod andre produkter uden at trække en klar grænse.
What they are trying to do, of course, is to pick out particular products as luxury articles, and play them off against others without drawing a clear dividing line.
Dette er en glædelig historie, fru formand, så vidt så godt og dog ikke godt nok.
Now, Madam President, we have gone some way and this is a success story, but we have not gone far enough.
Endnu en gang vil jeg prise hr. Ligios betænkning, og særlig der hvor han opfordrer Kommissionen til så hurtigt som muligt at fremsætte nye forslag om en afgiftsharmonisering af alle alkoholholdige produkter, der her er på tale.
Once again, I commend Mr Ligios on his report, in particular for his call that the Commission should submit as quickly as possible new proposals for harmonizing the taxation of all alcoholic beverages, because that is what we are talking about here.
Der er masser af hindringer i Fællesskabet.
Barriers abound in the European Community.
Den mest ekstreme og dramatiske findes her i dette meget smukke land, hvor vi debatterer i dag.
The most extreme and the most dramatic are to be found in this very beautiful country in which we are debating today.
Spiritusafgiften — dvs. på whisky, gin, vodka og brandy — er i dag i Frankrig 40 gange større end afgiften på øl og 35 gange større end vinafgiften.
The tax on spirits — that is, on whisky, gin, vodka and brandy — in France today is 40 times heavier than the tax on beer and 35 times heavier than the tax on wine.
Dette udgør en alvorlig handelshindring.
This constitutes a major barrier to trade.
Det er fuldstændig absurd. Alt hvad vi opnår er, at dårlig kvalitet bliver solgt i store mængder på grund af et lavt afgiftsniveau, mens vi via høje afgifter sørger for, at god kvalitet ikke sælges.
That is an absolutely absurd situation, and all it means is that, because of the low rates of tax imposed, poor-quality products are sold in great volume, while at the other end of the scale, the high rates of tax force down the sales figures on good quality.
Vi burde egentlig sætte alt ind på, at varer af dårlig kvalitet forsvinder fra markedet, mens varer af god kvalitet fremmes.
What we ought to be doing is making sure that poor quality disappears from the market and high quality is encouraged.
Det burde altså således være det omvendte, der skete.
In other words, our policy ought to be the reverse of what it actually is.
Jeg kan forstå, at min betænkning i dens nuværende form, som ændret af økonomi- og valutaudvalget, nu bliver støttet af Kommissionen — det er måske ikke den mest begejstrede støtte, men en slags støtte trods alt.
I understand that my report in its present form, as amended by the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, now has the support of the European Commission — perhaps not the most enthusiastic support but none the less its support.