natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det er unaturligt, at denne ordning i dag ikke anvendes i Storbritannien og i visse andre stater.
But we shall not achieve those extra resources unless we are realistic in the way we pass the resolution ; unless we realize that preconditions are essential.
tionen og ikke tage fejl af målet. Således tror jeg, hvad angår f.eks. begrebet uligevægt på budgettet, der tilskrives de for store landbrugsudgifter, at det må sættes i relation.
Another problem is that even if there is an increase in receipts from the Community budget, these resources will not be disbursable without conditions.
Siden 1973 har momsprovenuet vist en betydelig nedgang, en dalende tendens der er forbundet med krisen og med en stadig større nedgang i forbruget i Fællesskabet.
They will not go into our national budget for the purpose of financing projects according to a national develop ment plan.
Og Arndt betænkningen tager ikke hensyn til denne kendsgerning. ning.
They will have to be spent as the Community sees fit and in accordance with its objectives, and this will have the effect of increasing reliance, reducing our capacity for national planning, and so on.
Dette er klart ud fra en mere fjern, men mere realistisk anskuelse af situationen.
It is a resolution which has balance, and I hope this House will not seek in its amendments to destroy that balance.
Det er sådanne overvejelser, der viser vore vanskelig heder ved at acceptere denne betænkning i dens nuværende udformning, selv om den indeholder meget positive punkter.
I would like to pose the following question. What benefit is there for us in getting a few more appropria tions, a few more ECU, for unemployment, when it is our very membership of the EEC, and, even more so, the development of integration which are causing the immense problem of unemployment in our country ?
Jeg vil også gerne fremhæve det kunstige i den snævre opfattelse af forholdet mellem den fælles landbrugspolitik og anden politik.
The Communist Party of Greece is opposed to increasing the Community finances under these terms and will vote against the Arndt report.
Man kan ikke ræsonnere i snævre budgetudtryk uden at indsætte dette budgets udvikling i dens økonomiske, sociale og historiske sammenhæng.
Mr Alavanos (COM). — (GR) Mr President, we note certain positive elements in the Arndt report, such as its concern with the budgetary contribution and the more general economic strength of each member country, and with wider benefits and burdens, but we believe that these elements are of secondary impor tance in relation to the dominant theme of the budget, which is that of increasing the contributions of Member States along with the attack on agricultural spending.
Vi har stillet en række ændringsforslag, der til dels slutter sig til landbrugsudvalgets, og vi siger, at denne betænkning er en vigtig etape for Parlamentet inden topmødet i Athen.
Mr Delatte (L). — (FR) Mr President, Honorable Members, the report which our colleague, Mr Arndt, has written on the future financing of the Community is an opportunity for deeper reflection on the need to see how to improve the Community budget.
Parlamentet bør ikke kaste sig over landbrugspolitikken, selv om der må foretages reformer.
But there can be no expenditure without revenue and, on this subject, Parliament can only make suggestions.
Det bør tage hensyn til landbrugspolitikkens realiteter, den nødvendige reform af den og de øvrige problemer, som plager Fællesskabet.
This, more over, is what we find in the proposals to increase the ceiling on the VAT contributions to the Community budget — which seems to me to be quite essential, as Mr Simonnet also said just now.
Naturligvis må vi forbedre forvaltningen at den fælles landbrugspolitik og kæmpe imod den mekanisme, der muliggør overskudsproduktion, de monetære udlig ningsbeløb.
Thus the main problem for our country, Greece, is to determine the outcome in its case of the increase in the Community's financing.
Vi må også sørge for, at den fælles land brugspolitik tager hensyn til middelhavsprodukterne, der er et uomgængeligt komplement til landbrugets enhed på fællesskabsplan.
There are some, belonging to the democratic forces, who until a little while ago were underlining the negative consequences of our country's accession to the EEC but who are now thinking along the following lines : if the revenue of the Community is increased, then our receipts from the Community budget will also increase, since we are already a net beneficiary.
Men forskelsløst at lægge loft over landbrugsudgifterne forekommer os ikke at være en positiv løsning.
We do not share their line of thinking, much less their optimism. mism.
Vi vil derfor kun stemme for Arndt-betænkningen, hvis vore ændringsforslag, som tydeliggør den og virkelig tilfører den den dimension, der er nødvendig for Fællesskabets fremtid, vedtages af plenarforsamlingen. lingen.
Another source of revenue may occur if customs duties on ECSC products are integrated into the Community's own resources.
I øvrigt må man også tage hensyn til de verdensforhold, hvori Fællesskabet fastlægger sin politik og sit landbrug.
But I am surprised that he did not keep the Commission's proposals to create new resources via the tax on vegetable oils and fats.
For lidt siden hentydede en taler til de vanskeligheder, som de europæiske landmænd støder på, og til de faciliteter der ydes tredjelandes land mænd, især i USA.
This would be in line with GATT rules in that the European producers are taxed on a coresponsibility basis.
Formanden. — Kære kolleger, jeg har den glæde på Europa-Parlamentets vegne at byde velkommen til formandskabet for det portugisiske parlaments dele gation til det blandede udvalg Europa-Parlamentet— Republikken Portugals parlament.
In the first place, even if it is not disputable that our country's receipts will increase as a result of this alteration in the financing of the Community, the degree to which this increase will be genuine is very much open to dispute.
Formanden, hr. Rui Mateus, og hans kolleger, der har taget plads i den officielle loge, forbereder sammen med vore kolleger i det blandede udvalg dettes næste møde, som vil være af særlig betydning i betragtning af fremgangen i Portugals tiltrædelsesforhandlinger med Fællesskabet.
One thing is certain : Greece's contribution to the Community will rise while, in relative terms at least, we move towards a reduction in agricultural spending, bearing in mind that 60 % of the net receipts of Greece from the Community budget are covered by the EAGGF (Guarantee Section).
Endelig må man også udvide begrebet fællesskabspræference.
If we are to encourage the development of Europe, we must have the means of doing so.
Det er i dag en nødvendighed såvel for land brugspolitikken som for øvrig politik.
And cutting agricultural spending, as the Arndt report suggests, in order to implement other policies is merely robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Jeg vil gerne sige til nogle af vore kolleger, der ustandselig taler om forbrugerne, at man ikke må glemme, at i Fælles skabet må forbrugerne også være producenter, på landbrugsområdet og på industriområdet, og at det at behandle alle Fællesskabets borgere som forbrugere skjuler en vigtig del af Fællesskabets økonomiske lige vægt, for de er også producenter.
If it is possible to make savings by cutting the cost of disposing of certain surpluses, then it would be a good idea to continue with the attempt to encourage the development of crops of which there is a shortage.
De må også gribe ind i produktionsprocessen på europæisk plan og på verdensplan.
I do not feel it would be reasonable to envisage cutting the agricultural budget.
Jeg ønsker vore portugisiske kolleger et på én gang frugtbart og behageligt ophold i vor institution.
I should like to remind you that increasing the European budget does not mean increasing the burden of taxation or para-taxation.
Fællesskabets fremtidige finansiering skal absorbere dette begreb om juste retour, der i for høj grad er baseret på en nationalistisk holdning, der er ufrugtbar, og som med tiden vil have svare følger for Fællesskabet.
We believe, however, that this increase will come at a heavy price, since it is one of the elements in the economic integration of the Community, the consequences of which are particularly negative for our country.
Man må se at nå frem til at behandle dette rent budgetpolitisk og slet og ret politisk på fællesskabsplan.
We do have a redistribution of resources, that is, but not to the benefit of countries like Greece.
Det folkevalgte Europa-Parlament, som udtrykker den europæiske skatteborgers vilje, er forpligtet til at sikre den bedst mulige udnyttelse af fællesskabsmidlerne og bestandig kontrollere, at de forvaltes fornuftigt.
Europe cannot go on importing, on an unlimited and tax-free basis, products that generate surpluses of products exported with help from the budget.
Det er almindeligt anerkendt, at fællesskabsbudgettet hidtil har fungeret hovedsagelig til gavn for Fælles skabets rige lande.
Let us not forget that the future financing of the Community will mean an increase in the resources of the budget if we want — as we should — to set up our second-generation Europe.
Mens udgifterne hurtigt er steget, er indtægtsstigningen blevet holdt nede af indre begrænsninger eller maksimumgrænser.
Just now, my colleague Mr Rossi gave the position of the Liberal Group on the Arndt report and I should like to make some general remarks on agriculture.
Merværdiafgiften udviklede sig til Fælleskabets hovedindtægtskilde og dækker i dag ca. 60 % af Fællesskabets egne indtægter.
Look at the share of the budget that goes on agricultural spending and you can see there was a 12% drop between 1979 and 1984.
Allerede i 1980 begyndte Parlamentet at påpege risikoen for en udtømmelse af midlerne.
That is clear from the figures the Commission itself gives.
Realiteterne, som vi må se i øjnene i dag, tillader ikke de store eksperimenter med problemets løsning. En udvej kan findes enten med en radikal, institutionel ændring, som kan bremse den meget hurtige stigning af udgifterne, eller med en forhøjelse af indtægterne.
But in paragraph 3 of his report, Mr Arndt quotes percentages, comparing good years for the EAGGF with less good years and this gives a quite alarming and unfair picture because, as I say, the EAGGF's share of the general budget dropped from 73.8% in 1979 to 61.8% in 1984.
Arndtbetænkningen mener, at hovedårsagen til den forværrede budgetskævhed er de store udgifter til støtte til landbrugsprodukterne, som har bevirket, at der er opstået store strukturelle overskud.
This is encouraging and far less apocalyptic than the rapporteur, with his statement that the EAGGF share has gone from 56% to 66%, would have us imagine.
Det må imidlertid fremhæves, at overskuddene er et symptom snarere end årsagen til de nuværende vanskeligheder. Problemet ligger nemlig i hele tankegangen bag den fælles landbrugspolitik.
Mr Pesmazoglou (NI). — (GR) Mr President, both in the light of the immediate problems and in relation to the more distant perspectives of the European Community, this debate is truly historic.
Problemet med de strukturelle overskud løses ikke ved hjælp af straffeforanstaltninger, men med en revision af den fælles landbrugspolitik.
A positive outcome from the debate and the vote tomorrow will be an expression of our peoples' resolve to move towards European unification.
Forhøjelsen af loftet er uden tvivl den bedst egnede løsning indtægtsmæssigt set.
I also want to day that the aims and principles underlying this report are fully in step with the Commission's own proposal.
Stigningen kunne måske være højere end 1,4 %, som Kommissionen foreslår og Parlamentet hár accepteret.
In addition, I want to say that notwithstanding the substantial differences of view which have been expressed in some quarters there does exist a mature appreciation of the decisions which need to be taken, and the varying strands of opinion are, I think, knitting together.
Hvad angår afgørelserne og hvem der skal træffe dem, er overførslen af midler fra nationalt plan til fællesskabsplan en rent politisk afgørelse og bør derfor fortsat høre under de nationale parlamenters kompetence.
Notable in this respect was the state ment by Lord Douro on behalf of the European Democrats that an increase in the resources of the European Community is appropriate and necessary.
Hr. formand, PASOKs medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet mener, at en garanteret progressivitet for indtægternes vedkommende og en sammenhæng mellem udgifterne og medlemsstaternes velstandsniveau er et centralt mål for de kræfter, som drømmer om et anderledes, socialt retfærdigt og lige udviklet Europa.
Just now, Mrs Castle insisted on these figures too. As far as I am concerned, it is wrong to point to agriculture all the time, saying that it spends too much, is not competitive and so on, when the CAP — and why should we not say as much ? — has been the corner stone of the functioning of the Community so far.
Woltjer (S). — (NL) Hr. formand, det sker sjældent, at jeg offentlig udtaler mig imod nogle af de ting, gruppen har vedtaget.
There is a need to revise the way the common agricultural policy works, that I realize, but let us not forget that it was set up at a time when we were running at a deficit, which is no longer the case today.
Alligevel har jeg ment denne gang at måtte gøre det, ikke fordi ordføreren ikke har skrevet en god betænkning — det modsatte er tilfældet, det vil jeg her udtrykkeligt slå fast — men fordi jeg finder, at Parlamentet er i færd med at begå en stor fejl.
Thanks to the spectacular development of agriculture, not only do the Europeans have guaranteed food supplies, but we are exploiting a natural productive potential of which Europe has great need.
Hvad angår fordelingen af afgiftsbyrden på de forskellige medlemsstater, må den være præget af stærk progressivitet, således at budgettet kommer til at fungere som et middel til omfordeling af indtægten fra de rigeste til de fattigste områder i Fællesskabet.
And the modernization of agriculture, I should like to add, of agricultural technology and of the food and agricultural industry has meant a livelihood for many people, as 22% of the working population of Europe earns its living in the sector, if you include the activities around it.
I modsætning til hvad vi har set førhen, har Arndtbetænkningen modigt rejst progressivitetsspørgsmålet, og det er et af de vigtigste punkter i denne betænkning.
There is nothing constructive about it and it does not help us find any valid solutions.
Men hvis progressivitetsprincippet skal gennemføres inden for Fællesskabets økonomiske systems rammer, må de anvendte midler være klare, effektive i funktion og afspejle både medlemsstaternes afgiftsmæssige formåen og de fordele, de opnår. Derfor mener vi, at indeksen baseret på det national økonomiske nettodriftsoverskud er vanskelig at anvende og kan få negative konsekvenser for lande med en stor procentdel selvstændige, som det er tilfældet med Fællesskabets mindre udviklede lande.
If we carry on looking at nothing other than the budget and only aiming at cutting agricultural production, then we shall clearly lose our place on the market to our competitors — who are not frightened to subsidize their agriculture to a far greater extent than Europe subsidizes its.
Derimod ville en sammensat indeks, som tager hensyn både til forskellene i indtægt per capita og den fællesskabsinterne handels fordele og tab, leve bedre op til de ovennævnte krav.
I know that our partners across the Atlantic have economic problems of their own to cope with, particularly agricultural problems.
Som vi allerede har nævnt, betyder en forhøjelse af de egne indtægter en overførsel af midler fra nationalt til
But Europe's trade deficit in food and agricultural products with the USA, which is somewhere around $ 7 000 000 000, means we have to keep up the develop ment of our agricultural potential.
I Kommissionen tales der faktisk for en ændring i merværdiafgiften, hvis landbrugsudgifterne overstiger de 33 %.
First of all, although Mr Arndt is right in observing that the advantages and burdens of membership for each country should not be assessed-on net contribution alone, I do not think — and on this I agree with Mr Tugendhat — that these can be quantified.
Et af disse kriterier er de enkelte medlemsstaters landbrugsproduktions andel af den totale produktion. Hr. formand, jeg vil
Moreover, as far as the countries which receive more than they pay in are concerned, I should say that there are adverse effects in these countries which cannot be quantified in strict financial terms.
Jeg siger det på denne måde, fordi jeg synes, at Parlamentet netop under den drøftelse, vi havde af det britiske bidrag, hele tiden har fastslået, nemlig at det simpelt hen ønskede midlertidige løsninger.
My second comment is that in all the detailed work on the decisions involved we can use the mean per capita income of the Community as a whole as a basis for calculation.
Det har hele tiden så udtrykkeligt tilkendegivet, — og også ved det kommende budget vil dette være et vigtigt punkt — at vi ikke ønsker nogen juste retour, at Fællesskabet skal have sin egen politik.
Despite its shortcomings, this is an important indicator, and different rates of valueadded tax payable into the Community budget can be assessed solely on the differences in per capita income.
Overskudsproduktion er uacceptabel, og det mener jeg også, at jeg ved flere lejligheder har sagt her.
Hence Mr Arndt's proposals on this point are very apt and of great importance.
Jeg modsætter mig denne ændring, fordi den, som også hr. Notenboom sagde, betyder, at vi uden at ville det faktisk finder os i, at den fælles land brugspolitik skal forblive, som den er.
I think we should adopt them and that the VAT coefficient should be lower for those countries whose per capita incomes are below the mean for the Community.
Arndt (S), ordfører. — (DE) Jeg vil gerne gøre en lille bemærkning.
My third comment has to do with the common agricultural policy.
Hr. Simonnet påstod, at budgetudvalget og Parlamentet havde ændret holdning.
We need to be clear about the following points in particular.
Jeg vil gerne bede hr. Simonnet om endnu en gang nøje at læse Spinelli-beslutningen, der jo er den egentlige forbeslutning.
First, there is no condemnation of the common agricultural policy, rather a confirmation of its importance and of the need to persevere with it, and likewise with the system of Community preference in agricultural products.
Deri står der, at Parlamentet kun udtaler sig for en forhøjelse af de egne indtægter, hvis det forud er lykkedes at få hånd i hanke med overskudsproduktionen på landbrugsområdet.
As Mr Tugendhat, the Commissioner, underlined, dealing with the future financing of the Community is already displaying a political desire to unblock the current situation and courageously prepare the Community's future.
Og det har hele tiden været Parlamentets holdning ved alle afgørelser om budgettet siden 1980.
Secondly, we must succeed in cutting back on expenditure on products which are permanently in surplus.
Budgetudvalget har i dette spørgsmål konsekvent fastholdt sin stilling siden 1979.
This is essential, and in effect it means a reform of the common agricultural poliy.
Lalumière (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, efter to interimsbetænkninger af hr. Arndt har budgetudvalget nu den 11. oktober 1983 vedtaget den endelige betænk ning.
Thirdly, the variable VAT scale must not be calculated on the basis of Member States' receipts from the EAGGF, and on this I agree with what Mr de la Malène said a short while ago.
En udvidelse af de egne midler er tvingende nødvendig.
We thank Mr Arndt for having been so kind as to take a certain number of amendments we proposed into account.
En udvidelse af overproduktion af land brugsvarer er uacceptabel.
We find that his report contains some very positive points.
Denne holdning finder jeg klart udtrykt i ordførerens betænkning, og det vil jeg gerne understrege.
It is true that it is essential to raise VAT today and that it cannot be done in just any conditions and for just any reason.
Men — jeg gentager — at vedtagelsen, den være sig nok så midlertidig, af en ændring på indtægtssiden uden en ændring af politikken ikke fører Fællesskabet videre.
And the extra funds for new policies are also a necessity — but there again, the policies have to be agreed to by the Ten and they have to be defined.
Denne betænkning indeholder for det første forslag om at forhøje momssatsen fra 1 % til 1,4 %.
However, the report also contains a number of points we are unable to accept.
For det andet afviser betænkningen ethvert forslag om at indføre en ny beslutningsprocedure i tilfælde af forhøjelse af momssatsen.
We think the situation has to be analyzed better and that no mistakes should be made as to the target.
For det tredje mener betænk ningen, at forøgelsen af de egne indtægter er knyttet til en reform af den fælles landbrugspolitik.
So, the motion of budget imbalance, for example, which is attributed to excessive agricultural spending, I think has to be relativized.
For det fjerde angiver betænkningen, at der bør afsættes yder-. ligere bevillinger til ny politik.
Since 1973, in fact, VAT yield has dropped considerably because of the crisis and a deceleration in consumption in the Community.
I dette tilfælde er der fastsat tre indikatorer.
Mr Arndt's report fails to take this into account.
På den ene side hver stats andel af den samlede landbrugsproduktion, for det andet hver stats andel i Fællesskabets nettooverskud og endelig dens bruttonationalprodukt pr. indbygger.
Fourthly, the countries with low per capita incomes, the economically weaker countries that is, all the peripheral countries and more precisely Ireland and the Mediterranean countries — and this I underline because Greece is one of them — have relatively large agricultural sectors.
Dette femte element forklarer i meget vidt omfang, at det i det væsentlige er landbrugslandene, som bestemt vil blive dybt berørt af momsen, eftersom denne moms gennem disse ordninger vil blive større end den normale moms.
Hence in these countries, but more generally as well, it is essential that we move ahead with restructuring the agricultural sector.
Det er de vigtigste af de elementer, der findes i Arndtbetænkningen.
To this end, spending on agricultural restructuring must be kept at a high level and increased if we wish to succeed in putting our agricultural policy on a sound footing.
For det andet. I ordførerens betænkning læser jeg, at vi i øjeblikket egentlig ikke behøver at snakke om en momsforhøjelse, heller ikke ud over de 1,4%.
The costs curve, including agricultural spending, has increased at the same rate as the annual average Community rate of inflation, while annual income from VAT has dropped, relatively, at the same rate as the drop in growth of internal consumption in the Community.
Jeg forstår ikke argumentationen.
This is clear in a longer term and more realistic view of the situation.
Ordføreren siger, at det er et forslag, der i øjeblikket ikke er opportunt, at det egentlig er uden forbindelse med virkeligheden, og at vi derfor helst ikke skal snakke om det.
Fifthly, in these peripheral countries, and particularly in the Mediterranean countries, the size of farm hold ings is commonly small, Special measures are there fore required to support small producers and those farming difficult terrain such as mountainous regions and the islands.
At vi hellere først må se, om vi kan nå op på disse 1,4 %, og om medlemslandenes parlamenter ønsker at acceptere det.
With these modifications, we shall be able to reduce substantially our overall spending on agriculture.
Jeg synes, at det er de nationale parlamenters sag at sige, om de vil gå med til yderligere udvi delser af de egne indtægter eller ej.
It is impossible to reason in narrow terms of the budget without setting trends in that budget against its economic, social and historical background.