natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I realiteten udarbejdes de nye retsregler uden demokratisk prøvelse.
power transferred back to national parliaments, where governments elected by the people can carry out the programmes on which they were elected.
Fra de detaljer, der formulerer de bestemmelser, der virkelig betyder noget, er vi som Par lament i stigende grad udelukket.
I hope that next time the Summit meets, it will get down to the important issues facing the Common Market, those of unemployment and the economic crisis.
(Bifald fra den europæiske demokratiske gruppe)
IN THE CHAIR: MRS PERY
Det er, som andre har sagt det, et lille skridt, men trods alt et skridt i den rigtige ret ning, som ikke bør overses, idet det endog er for holdsvis vigtigt.
But this refers essentially to measures in regard to the internal market, so the new authority applies, in effect, to only half the activities of one of Parliament's 18 committees — and even in that small area there is still not genuine co-decision.
Vi kan ikke til slutte os en snæversynet og stædig holdning, der går ud på at sige til Det europæiske Råd : » Revidér Deres opgave, så skal vi udtale os bagefter«. For gruppens vedkommende accepterer vi det.
Our group wishes to reserve its position until such time as we have seen the final text of the Luxembourg Agreement.
Iversen (COM). — Topmødet i Luxembourg den 2.3. december 1985 er uspiseligt for mit parti.
Mr Romeos (S). — (GR) Madam President, for years on end, both within and outside the European Parliament, there has been discussion concerning the need to review the Treaties of Rome on the basis of past experience, in the light of present challenges, and with the aim of a Europe of the future.
Mødet vedtog mange ændringsforslag til Romtraktaten, ændringer der gør det sværere at leve med denne traktat.
A Europe that will be more decisive and effective in facing the challenges of today and tomorrow.
Men resultatet er — som jeg indledte med at sige — alligevel uspiseligt.
And within six months, much more rapidly than many would have expected, the leaders of the Member States — at the Luxembourg Summit — reached an important agreement on basic institutional reform.
Vi er meget bekymrede for indførelse af kvalificeret flertal på det indre marked, og vi er langtfra overbe vist om, at de garantier, der er gennemført på mil jøområdet, er gode nok.
Firstly, that the Treaty amendments for completing the Common Market do constitute legal obligations at least as binding as those contained in the EEC Treaty.
Vi er imod, at det europæis ke udenrigspolitiske samarbejde fortsat forbeholdes de 12 EF-lande, og at åbning over for andre lande åbenbart er illusorisk.
Secondly, that the amendment to Article 145 does not remove any powers from the Commission or give any new powers to the Council.
Vi er også imod, at Parlamentet skal have mere magt; afgivelse af magt til dette overnationale organ er uspiseligt for os.
Thirdly, that Parliament really has gained the right to reject Council common positions, even if at present in a limited field.
Vi mener, at der allerede nu burde have været sagt fra over for forliget.
No sooner had agreement been reached, than reactions flared and the debates and assessments began.
Vi ser ingen anden vej nu for Danmark end en dansk frigørelse fra EF på den ene eller anden måde.
The first reactions remind one of discussions about whether a glass should be referred to as half-full, or half-empty.
Vi synes efter debatten her i dag også, at både Danmark og EF ville være tjent med det.
Even half a glass is no small achievement amidst so many contrasts and conflicting interests.
De sagde, hr. Delors, at Kommissionen og Parlamentet er et parforhold.
This cannot be a time of celebration nor of congratulation.
En taler brugte for lidt siden udtrykket et ægteskab.
None the less, it is time for acknowledgement of limited achievement, and I would like to thank the Luxembourg presidency for what it has done in this regard.
Hvis man vil have parforholdet eller ægteskabet til at virke, skal parterne forblive hinancen tro, og jeg er bange for, at vi på et eller andet tidspunkt i formålstjenlighedens navn og af årsager, der ikke er til at forudse, bliver bedraget, og så vil systemet være blokeret, hvilket vil være over ordentlig beklageligt.
The European Community has surely been pushed forward by a combination of fear of potential crisis, democratic pressure from this Parliament and the will generated by a number of dynamic and deter mined individuals.
Staes (ARC). — (NL) Fru formand, jeg vil gøre op mærksom på, at initiativet til Eureka er kommet fra Frankrig som reaktion på De forenede Staters SDI-projekt.
Secondly, we have seen pressure from this Parliament, the Kangaroo Group and its committees — and I mention in particular Mr de Ferranti, Mr von Wogau, Mr Rogalla and Mrs Scrivener.
Uden SDI havde der aldrig været noget Eureka. ka.
Thirdly, we have been urged forward by a number
For mit vedkommende vil jeg opholde mig ved den i udkastet til de nye traktater foreslåede procedure.
However, let us answer yet another basic question.
Han er formand for energi, forsknings- og teknologiudvalget; jeg antager, at han
They are not to blame because the Community has not gone ahead with new policies.
Man kan forvente, at Europa-Parlamentet er villigt til at indgå kompromiser.
As representatives of Europe's peoples, let us get to the heart of the matter and set aside formalities.
Man kan kræve, at der erkender den kendsgerning, at det store reform forsøg for tiden ikke kan lykkes.
Let us fight for a Europe for all Europeans, for a Europe without frontiers, but also without inequalities.
Der er kun én ting, man ikke kan kræve af Europa-Parlamentet, nemlig at opgive kravet på at være parlament. Det vil sige, at vi ikke kan acceptere formuleringer, ifølge hvilke Europa-Parlamentet heller ikke i fremtiden får medbestemmelsesrettigheder. På dette sted bør den italienske regerings forbehold, at der skal ske revision, tiltrædes. des.
For a unified internal market with equal potentials and Community solidarity.
Nu siger man til os, at en genoptagelse sætter hele resultatet på spil.
But in Luxembourg we have a result.
For mig er det skinhellige argumenter fremsat af dem, der overhovedet ikke ønsker, at Europa-Parlamentet opnår mere, end der nu står i papirerne.
We have a result that can be shown in figures, that can be weighed up, that will be incorporated in the Treaties and, there fore, in the annals of the Community.
Desuden siger man til os, at enhver væsentlig ændring vil strande på Danmarks modstand.
It is true that once again the summit will not pass the test with flying colours.
Når Danmark blokerer for en demokratisering af Det europæiske Fællesskab, pålægger det sig en tung historisk belastning. ning.
If this political will is lacking, I cannot see what purpose will be served by greater powers and more radical institutional reform.
Walter (S). — (DE) Fru formand, mine damer og herrer, det, der kom ud af Luxembourg-mødet, er et utvivlsomt utilfredsstillende.
Mr Estgen (PPE). — (FR) Madam President, honourable Members, no one in this Chamber will object if I, as a Luxembourger, begin by congratulating the Luxembourg presidency for the exemplary manner in which it has acquitted itself of a very difficult task.
Hvis elleve medlemsstater virkelig vil have denne demokratisering af Fællesskabet, så kan og vil det ikke strande på den tolvte medlemsstat — hvis disse elleve virkelig vil have denne demokratisering og ikke bare dækker sig bag Danmark !
When we evaluate the Luxembourg summit — and evaluations will necessarily differ from one political camp to another and even from one individual to another — we must never lose sight of the initial situa tion.
Den mest populære forklaring herpå går ud på, at en gennemgribende reform af Fæl lesskabet var strandet på to eller tre medlemsstater.
True, we had an adjournment, but an adjournment to a precise date, to 16 and 17 December, the Conference of Foreign Ministers.
Det drejer sig her om et principielt spørgsmål for demokratiet!
We shall do so through the resolution we will be voting on this even ing.
Beslutningerne i Luxembourg betyder flere opgaver for EF og mindre indflydelse for de nationale parlamenter.
It is at that level that we must assume our responsibilities, for do not forget that public opinion, and history too, will judge not just the Heads of State in relation to the Luxembourg summit but also the Mem bers of this Parliament.
De giver ikke Europa-Parlamentet den magt, som de nationale parlamenter alle rede har mistet og yderligere vil miste.
It is true, and could have been foreseen from the start, that Parliament did not get what it wanted on many points.
De beriger institutionerne i Det europæiske Fælleskab på bekostning af demokratiet i medlemsstaterne.
But it did produce some results, which are the outcome of a difficult compromise achieved with great effort by the Luxembourg presidency.
Det er en far lig vej, der ikke burde være acceptabel for nogen, ikke for nogen gruppe.
It is a new Luxembourg Compromise, but far more cheering for every European than the first Luxembourg Compromise.
Uden falske partipolitiske hensyn og på basis af de flertal spositioner, vi har fundet her i Europa-Parlamentet hen over gruppegrænserne.
We must remember that unanimity is absolutely essential in order to get any change at all, to achieve the least progress by an amendment of the Treaties — and it is we here who wanted this amendment of the Treaties.
I øvrigt også uden skade fryd over for de medlemmer, der er så uheldige, at deres partier i øjeblikket har regeringsmagten i deres hjemland.
I would like to ask all my colleagues who, in the presence of the Council, are making great speeches here and loudly demanding more substantial progress, not just to act as Members of the European Parliament but also to act as responsible politicians in their own countries and to try to persuade their own govern ments and parliaments to follow a more European road.
Blot er denne af os krævede revision noget, Europa-Parlamentets selvagtelse byder os, og noget, som respekten for dem, der har sendt os til Europa-Parlamentet, byder os.
We are entirely in favour of what was agreed in Luxembourg: Eureka as part, but only part of the European Technological Community.
Mallet (PPE). - (FR) Fru formand, kære kolleger, der er ingen her i Parlamentet, der vil påstå, at Det
Eureka acts as a stimulus and motive force for that technological Com munity, especially as regards economic initiatives.
Og heller ikke forbunds regeringen ville have et virkeligt valutapolitisk og teknologisk samarbejde i Det europæiske Fællesskab uden forbehold.
In any case, the Eureka project must not lead to the growth of a new bureaucracy but serve as an opportunity to make use of our existing instruments and render them more effective.
træffes afgørelse med flertal, eller måske under kom plementære programmer af varierende struktur?
Estgen amendments which make it more difficult to live with that Treaty.
Hvordan vil fordelingen ske mellem de to niveauer?
However, I must say it is gratifying that the summit meeting did not end with the adoption of an actual union treaty.
Risikerer man ikke at fastlåse hele systemet på diskussionsplan i forbindelse med rammeprogrammerne, og hvilke ressourcer er medlemsstaterne rede til at frigive til programmerne?
It is also gratifying that the right of veto is upheld in most areas covered by the Treaty of Rome.
Jeg er bange for, at spørgsmålet forbliver uløst, og det, der i år sker i for bindelse med forsknings- og teknologibudgettet, er ikke egnet til at indgyde mig tillid.
But the result — as I said at the start — sticks in our throats all the same.
Vurderingerne fordeler sig faktisk mellem drabelige idealister og forsigtige idealister, mellem resignerede og ikke-resignerede idealister, mellem »ja, men«, el ler »ja, hvis« og »nej, men« eller »nej, medmindre«.
To conclude, while regretting that the overall results are unsatisfactory, we have to admit that an important step has been taken in Luxembourg, that the Com munity has not gone adrift and that it is still steering the same course.
Selv om resultaterne fra Luxembourg således ikke er lig nul, så er det helt klart, at de er skuffende og utilstrækkelige. På dette stade skal der ikke afsiges en endelig dom.
So since we do not want to do what we in Luxembourg call d'Ham an der Mellech kachen, which means to boil the ham in milk, let us not despair.
Uden en væsentlig styrkelse af integrationen og det europæiske samarbejde vil landene aldrig genfinde vejen til vækst og beskæftigelse og Europa ikke sin rolle og indflydelse i verden.
Let us think like Mr Delors, our President of the Commission, who said this morning that we had kept to our course and are therefore not adrift.
Man kan i dag tvivle om, at den politiske vilje er til stede i alle medlemsstaterne.
Let us, who know where we are heading, fight on.
Ganske vist kunne man frygte en total fiasko. Vi ken der divergenserne mellem medlemsstaterne og kravene i artikel 236.
We are very concerned about the introduction of the qualified majority on the internal market, and we are far from convinced that the guarantees which have been provided in the environmental area are good enough.
Takket være en række regeringers politiske vilje, det luxembourgske formandskabs klogskab og Kommisionens gode forslag blev der gjort et lille fremskridt, især henimod gennemførelse af et europæisk område uden indre grænser og en reform af institutionerne for at gøre dem mere effektive og demokratiske.
We are opposed to a continued restriction of European foreign policy cooperation to the 12 Com munity countries; any opening up of the Community to other countries is clearly illusory.
Det er måske et sidste udgangspunkt, dersom Europa-Parlamentet med fasthed ud nytter sin indflydelsesevne.
We are also opposed to the European Parliament getting more powers; the delegation of power to this supranational organization is unacceptable to us.
Men disse resultatet er helt utilstrækkelige i forhold til borgernes forventninger, den europæiske fremtids nødvendigheder og de mokratiets krav.
Mr Prout (ED). — Madam President, my concern is with the proposed amendment to Article 145.
Patterson (ED). — (EN) Jeg taler som Parlamentets ordfører for det interne marked, og i den egenskab bemærker jeg, hvor vigtigt det er klart at skelne mellem mæl og midler.
The problem, Madam President, is that if the powers of the Commission are reduced in favour of the Council, so are the powers of Parliament.
Jeg skal ikke komme ind på de begrænsninger, und tagelser, smuthuller og tvetydigheder af alskens slags, som sætter snævre grænser for aftalernes rækkevidde.
My party, the Socialist People's Party, would like to have brought about some clarity in the Danish Folketing, already in the debate yesterday night, which closed at 3 a.m.
Endvidere spekulerer jeg i særdeleshed på indholdet af kapitlet om forskning og teknologisk udvikling. Teksten er god.
The Commission appears happy with the new clause granting the Council the right to exercise implement ing powers directly.
Den omfatter en række handlingsmuligheder, men vil den blive brugt?
If it grants the Council executive powers, then it is to get some thing that so far it clearly does not possess.
Den nuværende situation på dette område får mig til at tænke på en mand — undskyld min billedlige udtryk småde — der foregiver at have en ægteviet hustru, fællesskabet, samtidig med at han uden for hjemmet har to elskerinder, Eureka og SDI.
It must also say whether or not the Council is restricted to acting on a Commission proposal or whether it can legislate independently.
I f.eks. artikel 1 har vi en definition af det interne marked som et marked uden grænser.
For my part I should like to dwell on the cooperation procedure with Parliament provided for under the new draft treaties.
Jeg forstår det som ikke blot nogle grænser, men ingen grænser, og det er vigtigt, selv hvis det ikke er juridisk bindende : det er en udtalelse om politisk hensigt.
If I have understood correctly, we are being granted two rights: one is the right to amend, the other the chance to deliver a concurring opinion in very specific cases, which are a hypothetical further enlargement and certain agreements with third countries, which I will not go into now.
Artikel 100a er klart et fremskridt, for så vidt som den fastlægger kvalificeret flertalsafstemning om nogle af de nødvendige foranstaltninger.
The procedure in regard to the Outgoers Scheme is a recent example of this.
Der er styrkede juridiske procedurer, som jeg glæder mig over at se, mod at snyde ved at anvende protektionistiske foranstaltninger under dække af sundhedsforordninger, og der er denne artikel 6, der, selv om den ikke er nær så skarp, som vi gerne ville have set den, i 1992 virkelig vil sørge for en mekanisme til om nødvendigt at rydde alle behovene for lovgivning af vejen og til en gensidig anerkendelse af kvalifikationer og normer.
Important political and budgetary questions are decided by a Commission proposal to the Council, excluding Parliament under a purported but often entirely bogus delegated legislative power. In reality new legislation is being made without democratic scrutiny.
Alt det er meget positivt.
We are simply asked about the framework.
Det gælder om at finde ud af, om Fællesskabet sejrer over regeringssamarbejdet eller ej, eller om de to metoder om muligt af Kom missionen gøres komplementære og samordnede.
Mr Iversen (COM). — (DA) The summit meeting in Luxembourg on 23 December 1985 was something that sticks in the throat of my party.
Men nu kommer jeg til mit »hvis«, og her vil jeg gerne, at kommissionsformanden lytter, da jeg har et vigtigt spørgsmål til ham.
True, and others have said it too, it is a small step, but at least it is a step, and not one to be dismissed, for it is in fact relatively important.
Tidligere refererede hr. Spinelli til en udtalelse i det britiske underhus om, at Luxembourg-forliget ikke var blevet drøftet, og hr.
If we look at the articles of the Treaty involved, we see that it covers the rules prohibiting all forms of discrimination, it relates to freedom of movement, the right of establishment, the approximation of legislation and commercial policy and, in addition, to matters also provided for in the new draft treaties, namely cohesion and technological research and development.
Men hr. Delors sagde meget klart i sin redegørelse, at der havde været enighed om at ændre Rådets procedurer.
It is indeed not in line with what the majority of this Assembly wanted, but we accept it and will take it.
Hvis det nu er tilfældet, besvarer det mit » hvis «.
We will not make a stubborn and obstinate stand and say to the European Council: 'look again at your duty and then we will decide'.
Nu burde tiden være inde til, at Parlamentet indser, at en traktat om oprettelse af en europæisk union ikke længere er aktuel, at tændsatsen til unionsfyrværkeriet ikke fungerer. Man må indse, at visse regeringschefer på store møder er lette ofre for at bruge store ord, men ingen vilje har til at omsætte disse i konkrete tanker.
There is, however, one little detail which is quite important and which worries me in this process: in the shuttle system that is to be set up between Parliament and the Council, if I have understood rightly the Commission will have to forward its amended opinion to the Council after Parliament itself has tabled its amendments.
Filinis (COM). — (GR) Fru formand, jeg mener, at vort Parlament med knusende flertal burde vedtage beslutningsforslaget fra udvalget om institutionelle spørgsmål, som kritiserer de alvorlige og farlige for sinkelser, der noteredes på topmødet for nylig i Luxembourg, med hensyn til radikal institutionel reformering af Fællesskabet.
Mr Walter (S). — (DE) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the outcome of the Luxembourg summit is definitely unsatisfactory.
Regeringskonferencen sluttede at to lande, ikke med tog forbehold, men for Italiens vedkommende sagde man, at man ville af gøre sin stilling ud fra, hvilken holdning Parlamentet indtog.
The favourite explanation is that the failure to achieve a radical reform of the Community was due to two or three Member States.
Danmark sagde: vi ser os ikke i stand til at sige ja eller nej her og nu.
This is a popular explanation, but the wrong one.
Der vil ikke være et folkenes demokratiske og forene de Europa, et borgernes Europa, så længe løsningen af dette problem udsættes.
You said, Mr President of the Commission, that the Commission and Parliament formed a couple.
Vi bør være bestemte.
A moment ago someone said it was a marriage.
Det er der tre grunde til : der skal foretages en række undersøgelser med hensyn til garantier, tekster og protokoller, dvs. i forhold til hvilke juridiske konsekvenser disse har.
Secondly, we Members must discuss in public back home the reasons why this radical reform was not achieved at Luxembourg — leaving aside artificial party political considerations and on the basis of the majority findings which we have reached here in the European Parliament across group boundaries.
Det har også for det andet noget at gøre med, at det er svært at vide Italiens stillingtagen, sådan som den blev formuleret på regeringskonferencen, da den er afhængig af, hvilken stilling Parlamentet indtager i dag.
And also without any malice towards colleagues who have the misfortune to belong to parties which are in power back home.
Vi har brug for en Kommission med fuld komptence, som ikke bør beskæres af Ministerrådets uacceptable substitut-rettigheder.
Mr Staes (ARC). — (NL) Madam President, I would point out that the Eureka initiative was originally taken by France in response to the United States' SDI plan.
Fællesskabets økonomiske system bør omdannes radikalt, således at den nye fællesskabspolitik kan finansieres.
As regards the negotiating position of the German Federal Government one thing is clear, the govern ment of the German Federal Republic did not want any real right of codetermination for the European Parliament.
Et internt marked uden grænser vil først som helhed være gavnligt, når kløften mellem Fælles skabet og De forenede Stater samt den interne kløft mellem Fællesskabets rige og fattige lande begynder at udjævnes.
Neither did the Federal Government really want to overcome the veto in the Council of Ministers, and neither did it want genuine monetary and technological cooperation within the European Community without any ifs or buts.
Og så er der for det tredje det faktiske forhold, at der i øjeblikket ikke findes endelige tekster på bordet. Det måtte man i hvert fald konstatere fra den danske regerings side i gåre i folketinget.
I would also point out that Mr Poniatowski said during the technology debate in this Chamber in early October that it was in fact impossible to separate the civil and military aspects of the new technologies.
Derfor skal jeg blot konstatere, at den danske regering i dette øjeblik ikke har taget stilling — dvs. hverken siger ja eller nej. At ej heller det parlamentariske flertal med regeringspartierne og det parti, jeg repræsenterer i folketinget, har sagt ja eller nej.
He is the chairman of the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology.
Vi vil forholde os afventende og ej heller møde op med et ja eller et nej på udenrigsministermødet den 16.-17. december. Der må ske nogle afklaringer, hvorefter også Danmark må tage stil ling.
I would point out that the European Space Agency, ESA, is being led up the garden path by the United States as regards ESA's participation in Spacelab test flights, during which nothing short of military tests involving the destruction of satellites with lasers in space are to be carried out with ESA equipment supplied by the German industry.
Jeg vil slutte med at sige, at jeg personlig meget håber, at de garantier, der er blevet givet om noget helt afgørende principielt og nyt vedrørende det indre marked, må dreje sig om minimumsdirektiver, der
I would point out that France recently approved as part of its force de frappe a billion franc programme for