natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Til næste år vil vi ikke bare stå over for et muligt loft over indtægterne, men også et loft i form af valg, som altid er det, der virker stærkest i Fællesskabet.
Next year we are up against not only possible ceilings on revenue but also ceilings on elections which are always the more powerful in the Community.
Det er utænkeligt, at momsloftet kan hæves før 1988 og urealistisk og uansvarligt at forsøge at skubbe hele vægten af den akkumulerede gæld foran sig — for det er det, vi taler om — ind i endnu et drømmeland, hvor det vil se lidt let tere ud at føre politik.
It is inconceivable that the VAT ceiling will be raised before 1988 and unrealistic and irresponsible to seek to roll forward the whole weight of accumulated debt — because that is what we are talking about — into yet another nevernever world where the politics will look a bit easier.
Problemet er, at efter min erfaring bliver politikken aldrig den lille smule lettere.
The trouble is, in my experience, politics never turn out to be that bit easier.
Vi udfordrer ikke Rådet med vore handlinger, vi åbner døren for det.
We are by our actions not confronting the Council but opening the door to the Council.
Vi ville have spænet det inde i dets egne gerninger.
We are saying that we are giving them a
Denne vægring finder vi ligeledes alvorlig, fordi den nuværende interessekonflikt kunne få negative virkninger, for så vidt den foreslåede gennemførelse af enhedsmarkedet angår.
That there should be a concept of com munity and common welfare that is not afraid to challenge national preoccupations where these are destructive of the common good is essential and desirable.
Barbarella (COM). — (IT) Hr. formand, jeg mener, at det er vigtigt at understrege, at det nu er andet år i træk, at vi er tvunget til at behandle noget, der faktisk ikke er et rigtigt budgetforslag, men igen et regnskabs
But the systematic pursuit of goals that the incompatible with the essential national consensus upon which the citizens' and the taxpayers' welfare is founded is intellectually immature and politically foolish.
Det er indlysende, at man uden aktive politiske for anstaltninger — som kun vil være mulige med med lemsstaternes finansielle medvirken — vil blive vidne til en yderligere uddybning af den udviklingskløft, der kunne blive en kendsgerning med gennemførelsen af et virkeligt enhedsmarked.
This policy will head for the sands, Mr President, because you will be aware no doubt that we are rapidly moving into a situation where the three biggest northern countries — and I include France in that bloc — will find them selves net contributors to all the major funds in the budget and at that point they are going to say, faced with repeated demands to spend more money, no we will not pay.
Barbarella en i lyset af fortidens byrder ville blive tvunget til at anvende det, den råder over i budgettet for 1986 til at råde bod på fortiden i stedet for at vende sig mod fremtiden.
The second reason, is that this refusal introduces a further harsh note into the north-south conflict of interests, by which term I mean not so much the geographical position of the two terrritorial areas in question as rather the differences in growth and develop ment that persist and are becoming even more marked within the Community.
Dette er blevet fremhævet af andre kolleger, men også jeg vil gerne understrege det med eftertryk.
We would have imprisoned them in their own actions.
Vi er derfor på den ene side vidne til en konstant udhuling af de ikkeobligatoriske ud gifter og på den anden side til en anvendelse af den infernalske mekanisme, som Rådet har kaldt »budgetdisciplin«. getdisciplin«.
I trust that the Council will take the opportunity to produce a budget for twelve states and that when it does it will find a Parliament ready to meet it in a responsible debate on our joint responsibilities towards the mass of Com munity citizens for whom inter-institutional power battles are at best a mystery and at worst an insulting irrelevance.
Det tredje og sidste element, jeg vil understrege, er den rolle, den teknologiske innovation bør spille i det nyopstillede budget.
We feel that the fact that this conflict of interests is getting sharper is all the more serious because of the fact that as from 1 January 1986 the Community is going to be enlarged to include Spain and Portugal.
I den sammenhæng vil jeg min de kollegerne om, at min gruppe har stillet et ændringsforslag, som budgetudvalget støtter, og som omsætter en politisk afgørelse, Parlamentet har truffet, i praksis i budgettet : nemlig afgørelsen om at gen nemføre de supplerende programmer, der er inde holdt i beslutningen om de egne indtægter, som ville gøre det muligt at iværksætte en ny politik for teknologisk innovation.
It seems to us that by voicing this sinking feeling that we have, we might sound a warning note to the new Member States, alerting them to the lack of resolve on the part of the majority to free the Community from the toils of a European concept that is, at the moment, largely visualized in terms of agriculture.
Jeg mener, at det er nødvendigt at gentage, at hvis den teknologiske innovation, som alle synes at mene, skal betragtes som en strategisk faktor i den europæiske udvikling, er det også indlysende, at der på fællesskabsniveau skal startes projekter, at det altså ikke er muligt, at Fællesskabet afstår fra at deltage i det omfattende samarbejde på teknologiområdet, som Europa bør starte.
This refusal also seems to us very serious because the ongoing conflict of interests could have an unfavourable influence on the achievement of the single market, which has been so loudly trumpeted and is so eagerly looked forward to.
Hr. formand, det er den situation, Parlamentet har befundet sig i her, hvor det har skullet behandle for slaget til budget for 1986.
Mrs Barbarella (COM). — (IT) Mr President, I fell that it is important to stress the fact here that this is the second year in succession that we are being forced to consider something that is not a proper draft budget.
Det siger sig selv, at Parlamentet i lyset af Rådets holdning ikke har haft anden mulighed end at give Rådet et politisk skarpt og især konstruktivt svar.
Once again it is a piece of book-keeping that does not face up to the real figures for expenditure in 1986, which can indeed be accurately predicted, but only part of that expenditure.
Derfor betragter vi budgetudvalgets løsning som den bedste, dvs. opstilling af et budget, der udtrykker de reele udgifter. På denne baggrund er vi taknemmlige for, at udvalgets ordfører har arbejdet i denne ret ning, i øvrigt med vores aktive støtte.
It is obvious that without a policy permitting vigorous action to be taken — and only financial solidarity on the part of the Member States will make this possible — the differences in development which could be brought about, by a genuine single market could not but become even more marked.
Tillad mig, hr. formand, at understrege et sidste spørgsmål, som efter vores opfattelse er af central betydning, nemlig den kendsgerning, at der i dette nye budgetforslag, som er et vigtigt og meget ansvarsfuldt stykke arbejde fra det kompetente udvalgs side, er et punkt, Parlamentet som sådant bør være op mærksomt på.
This refusal on the part of the Finance Ministers to take into account expenditures that must be made — such as those, for example, bound up with the enlarge ment of the Community to include Spain and Portugal or those that must be made to honour commitments entered into in the past under the Social and Regional Funds — I regard as politically unacceptable and cer tainly devoid of any procedural legality.
Det vedrører den fasthed, hvormed det må forsvare sit standpunkt under førstebehandlingen og andenbehandlingen.
It seems to us that this refusal is extremely serious for at least three important reasons.
Vi mener, at det har været vigtigt at få udarbejdet et budget på et realistisk grundlag, men at det er lige så vigtigt, at Parlamentet holder fast ved denne holdning lige til afslutningen af budgetproceduren.
The third of the reasons is still the refusal of the Finance Ministers to face up to expenditures that ought to be made seems to constitute a fresh attack on the powers of Parliament.
Efter min opfattelse vil vi kunne fremføre gyldige argumenter også i det tilfælde, at Rådet ikke skulle acceptere vore forslag, men ulykkeligvis vedtage procedurer, der sågar kunne resultere i, at vi blev indbragt for Domstolen.
This has already been pointed out by other Members, but I too would like to hammer home that point with all the force at my com mand.
Jeg mener, at vi bør være meget beslutsomme, og at vi, overbeviste som vi er om det rigtige i vores standpunkt, bør videreføre det til den bitre ende.
We feel that the decisions, on the part of the Council makes Parliament's first reading of the draft budget quite meaningless.
Og den anden grund til, at vi bør vise en sådan beslutsomhed, er, at vi på ingen måde kan acceptere en udvanding af Fællesskabets interventionsinstrumenter.
Furthermore, with all the cuts that have been made in noncompulsory expenditure, it is clear that de facto we are being put into a situation where Parliament's actual margin of man oeuvre is going to be curtailed.
Dette er den eneste måde, hvorpå vi kan åbne mulighed for, at Det europæiske Fællesskab op lever udvikling og vækst.
On the one hand, therefore, we have a constant erosion of non-compulsory expenditure, while on the other we have the operation of this devilish mechanism called 'budgetary discipline' by the Council.
Jeg ønsker ikke, at man betragter disse udgifter som en slags betalinger, man kun kan bjærge en del af.
This then, Mr President, was the situation facing Par liament when it came to consider the 1986 draft budget.
Vi bør holde os til de tal, Kommissionen har forelagt os som værende realistiske og så i forbindelse med dem vise os urokkelige. Vi kan ikke betragte udgifterne til de såkaldte fortidens byrder som udgifter, der kan forhandles om til lavpris.
Faced with this attitude on the part of the Council, it is obvious that the only course open to Par liament was, at least in our opinion, to give the Council an answer that was politically hard-hitting but above all constructive.
Disse udgifter er resultatet af byrder, Rådet har påtaget sig, og de må derfor respekteres.
What it boils down to is that the Council's destructive approach had to be rejected.
Jeg ønsker ikke, at en nedskæring af disse udgifter, som foretages på baggrund af en misforstået kompromisvilje, rent konkret fører til, at de strukturelle fonde i løbet af regnskabsåret 1986 og i de efter følgende år blokeres i en sådan grad, at Kommission
It had to be forced in practice to face up to the responsibilities it had undertaken in respect of the new Member States and when it entered into other commitments
Scrivener (L). — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, jeg komplimenterer først vor ordfører, hr. Christodoulou, som jeg takker hjerteligt for det store arbejde, han har udført.
Barbarella by agreeing to and adopting new regulations for both the Social and the Regional Funds.
Det er klart, at tiltrædelsen bør give disse nye medlems lande mulighed for udvikling og ikke medføre, at de kvæles.
In this sense we are grateful to the committee's rapporteur for having directed his work towards this end in the achievement of which we have actively collaborated. ated.
Herefter kommer jeg til det egentlige. Den liberale gruppe udtaler sig imod et budgetforslag, hvis mangel på seriøsitet er åbenbar.
We feel that in the proposal put before us by the Com mittee on Budgets there are three points that are parti cularly important and that we would like to stress very strongly.
Dette budgetforslag er en far ce, hvis ophavsmand, dvs. Ministenådet, ikke længe re kan få nogen til at le.
With regard to the expenditure bound up with the accession of Spain and Portugal, we consider it essential that the reconstructed budget should put down real figures.
Rådet har sagt til os: »Proceduren er endnu ikke slut, vi har stadig mulighed for at supplere beløbene til udvidelsen i løbet af anden behandlingen.
I refer, of course, to the Social and Regional Fund expenditures that will have to be undertaken in favour of the new Member States.
Indtil nu har vi ikke hørt et eneste tilfredsstillende svar.
Real figures, that is to say realistic figures, to cope with the so-called 'burden of the past'.
Jeg sagde for et øjeblik siden, at den liberale gruppe udtaler sig i bestemte vendinger imod dette budget forslag.
There is one last point which we regard as crucial.
Det er således i lige så kraftige vendinger, at min gruppe udtaler sig til fordel for budgetudvalgets forslag, der går ud på at gøre dette budget troværdigt, hvilket det ikke er.
This reconstruction of the budget was an important undertaking which was carried out in a very responsible manner by the Committee on Budgets.
Endvidere vil jeg gerne understrege det permanente paradoks, som fællesskabinstitutionerne befinder sig i for øjeblikket.
However, there is a further point which Parliament as such must bear in mind, namely, the firmness with which it must defend its position in the first and second readings.
Man må selv danne sig et skøn : på den ene side har vi medlemslandenes regeringer, som for de flestes vedkommende fortsætter med at afvise en forøgelse af Europa-Parlamentets beføjelser, og som således allerede anser Parlamentets muligheder for at øge sine udgifter, f.eks. med 217 mio ECU for 1986 for en for stor beføjelse.
We feel that to reconstruct the budget on the basis of real istic figures was a major achievement, but that it is equally vital that this firmly held position of Parliament must be maintained right up to the end of the budgetary procedure.
De må tilstå, at dette trods alt er for galt.
I say this for two reasons.
For der må vælges her : enten gør Rådet for fremtiden sit arbejde — og Parlamentet vil ikke længere behøve at prøve at rette — i øvrigt for anden gang — på de lemlæstede budgetter, det får forelagt, eller også må man give Parlamentet reelle beføjelser til at gøre sin indflydelse gældende på budgettet.
One, which relates to our powers, is that, at a time when the powers of the European Parliament are being discussed within the framework of reform of the treaties, Parliament itself must demonstrate tangibly its unwavering determination to repulse any attack on its powers, and the budget envisaged by the Council is, con sidered quite objectively, an attack on Parliament's powers.
Fællesskabet har påtaget sig forpligtelser over for Spanien og Portugal.
If we do this, we need have no fear of the dangers or the consequences that might flow from a firm approach.
Vort budgetudvalgs ændrings forslag tager udelukkende sigte på at respektere dem.
I believe that we have got to be very firm in our defence of Par liament's powers and that, convinced as we are of the rightness of our positions, we must see it through to the bitter end.
Fællesskabet har ligeledes over en ånække påtaget sig en række andre forpligtelser.
The second reason for firmness is that we cannot in any shape or form to the Community's instruments being eviscerated.
Også her har de ændringsforslag, som vi har fået forelagt, kun til hensigt at holde ord.
They are the only means left to us for keeping alive for the future the possibility of development and growth in the European Community.
Med Deres tilladelse, hr. formand, vil jeg nu i sammenhæng med det foreliggende budget fremsætte to betragtninger, som rent faktisk vedrører Fællesskabets fremtid.
I should not like this expenditure to be regarded as a payment only part of which can be recouped. I feel that we must stand by the figures submitted to us as realistic figures by the Commission and that we must dig in our heels on this position.
For det første vil jeg gerne sige nogle ord om det begreb, som man kalder »fuld modydelse«.
I am convinced that we cannot regard the expenditures for the so-called 'burden of the past' as negotiable downwards.
Det er indlysende, at disse ord burde være for vist fra Fællesskabet. De burde aldrig have set dagens lys.
They are in respect of commitments entered into by the Council and which it must honour.
Men jeg tror afgjort, hr. for mand, kære kolleger, at man skal anerkende Parlamentets udholdenhed.
It is a farce whose author, the Council of Ministers, has long since ceased to make anyone laugh.
For denne udholdenhed er en delig ganske enkelt affødt af vor vished om, at Euro pa i den verden, vi lever i, er mere nødvendig end nogen sinde.
The Council tells us, the procedure is not yet complete and we still have an opportunity of completing the sums for enlargement during the second reading.
Vi bør meddele Rådet, at det Parlamentet undtagelsesvis er gået med til, ikke kan accepteres i fremtiden.
The third and last factor that I should like to stress is the prominent place that must be given to technological innovation in any reconstruction of the budget.
Vi vil ikke bevæge os henimod et Fællesskab, hvor princippet om »fuld modydelse« bliver grundprincippet.
In this connection I should like to remind the House that my group has tabled an amendment which the Committee of Budgets accepted translating into budgetary terms a decision already taken by Parliament.
Og på dette punkt skelner vi skarpt mellem spørgsmålet om det britiske bidrag og bidraget for den nuværende udvidelse.
This was the decision to get to work on the supplementary programmes made possible by last year's decision on own resources, which would enable us to get a policy of technological innovation off the ground, in a new way.
Hvad skal der blive af de jorde, der er blevet forladt af kornproducenterne?
put right what it, the Council, has done badly or, what is worse, what it has beed unable to do.
Skovbeplantning er næppe noget universalmiddel.
It is, you must admit, a bit much.
Et ikke-budget først og fremmest, da man ikke har overholdt princippet om et generelt budget, da det ikke indeholder alle de forpligtelser, Fællesskabet har indgået, uanset om det drejer sig om fortidens for pligtelser over for strukturfondene eller nye forpligtelser, politiske forpligtelser som følge af Fællesskabets udvidelse med Spanien og Portugal. Og som et åben lyst paradoks er det netop de stater, der mest har ønsket denne udvidelse, som i dag afviser at påtage sig de økonomiske konsekvenser heraf.
The Community has made various undertakings vis-à-vis Spain and Portugal, and the amendments sumbitted by our Committee on Budgets have the sole object of ensuring that they are respected.
Hvis Fællesskabet til gengæld producerede al den føde, der er nødvendig for at ernære de dyr, det avler, i stedet for at importere denne føde, ville ti mio hektarer blive berørt.
Once more, in connection with the 1986 budget as with that for 1985, Parliament is assuming its responsibilities.
Alt imens landbruget i USA sætter mere og mere ind på de industrielle afsætningsområder, så som bioetanol, er Fællesskabet og de stater, det består af, ikke i stand til at fastlægge en udvikling, som var de hæmmet af de modstridende opfattelser hos de forskellige pressionsgrupper, som modarbejder hinanden.
Despite all the traps laid on its path, and with the modest means at its disposal, it is going to try and transform into a true draft budget what one would never have dared to present to a national parliament — that is to say, to adopt a draft budget which com promises all the elements of expenditure that are known at the moment of its adoption.
Kun en omlægning af produktionerne til imødekom melse af Fællesskabernes behov ville åbne mulighed for en begrænsning af omkostningerne ved den fælles landbrugspolitik, samtidigt med at de åbnede reelle fremtidsperspektiver for landbrugerne.
Finally, Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I think that our Parliament has to be given credit for being tenacious, for this tenacity is in the end simply based upon our conviction that, in the world we live in, Europe is more than ever necessary.
Såvel den ene som den anden af disse holdninger fører til ét og samme resultat : et ikke-Europa.
If you will allow me, Mr President, I should now like, in connection with the present budgetary situation, to make a couple of reflections concerning the future of the Community.
Jeg vil gerne give et par eksempler.
In the first place, I should like to say a few words about the idea known as juste retour.
Vil alle stater for fremtiden ikke føle sig fristet til at påberåbe sig reglen om »fuld modydelse« ved at begrænse deres bidrag til de fælles politikker således, at de ligger på linje med de fordele, som de forventer at kunne få?
Mr Pasty (RDE). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, if I had to summarize in a short phrase the draft budget before us I would say that it is a nonbudget for a non-Europe.
Endelig giver de, som forestiller sig, at en reduktion af landbrugsudgifterne ville gavne de nye politikker, udtryk for enten naivitet eller ond tro. Det er ikke kravene til budgettet, der hindrer udviklingen af nye fælles politikker, men rettere manglende politisk vil je.
It is a non-budget, first of all, because in defiance of the principle of budgetary completeness it does not cover all of the commitments which the Community has contracted, be they commitments from the past for the structural funds or new commitments, i.e. political commitments resulting from the enlargement of the Community to include Spain and Portugal.
Rent faktisk vil nye fælles politikker, hvis de er rigtigt udtænkt, især på områder som ny teknologi, transport og telekommunikation, ikke blive kilde til yderligere udgifter, men i realiteten til besparelser takket være den synergistiske og afsmittende virkning. ning.
The glaring paradox is that it is those States which pushed hardest for this enlargement who are today refusing to accept the financial consequences.
Endnu engang er der ingen reserve opført til at hæve landbrugspriserne, som praktisk talt fastfryses for tredje år i træk.
In the former case, we are confronted with a new rule in a treaty previously freely agreed to.
De beskedne midler i dette budgetforslag, Rådets for sinkede vedtagelse af det nødvendige juridiske grund lag for en aktion på fællesskabniveau, bekræfter des værre indtrykket af dette budgets ikke-Europa.
This changes the very nature of relations among members of the European Community.
Det vil ganske enkelt sige, at den eneste løsning, der er foreslået med hensyn til problemet om overskud dene, er en blind bortskaffelse på grund af utilstrækkelige indtægter for de landbrugere, der ikke nødven digvis er de mindst effektive, og som er så uheldige at bo i Fællesskabets fattige områder.
In the second case, that of enlargement, if Parliament has restored the appropriations, that is because it is a matter if ensuring, during a period of transition, that these accessions do not entail grievous consequences for the entire economy of the countries concerned. It is clear that accession must allow those newly acceding to develop and not lead to their asphyxiation.
De 2 200 mio ECU, som adskiller de tal, der var resultatet af budgetudvalgets afstemninger, fra Rådets tal, kan forekomme at være et meget lille beløb i for hold til den europæiske indsats. Begrunder dette en institutionel krise, som risikerer at mobilisere en vis energi i mange måneder på et tidspunkt, hvor denne energi bedre kunne anvendes til at tage de mange udfordringer op, som Europa står overfor?
On the one hand, most governments of the Member States persist in refusing to increase the powers of the European Parliament and consider that the possibility of this Parliament's increasing expenditure — as, for example, 217 million ECU for 1986 — is already an undue privilege.
Pasty des at forventningerne hos dem, som har valgt os, kan opfyldes.
Pasty because of the strict application of budgetary discipline is narrowly sectoral and short-term.
I budgetudvalget har vor gruppe ydet et enormt samarbejde igennem vor hovedordfører, hr. Christodoulous bestræbelser, om hvem jeg kan sige, at han har lagt store bestræbelser for dagen for at nå frem til almindelig enighed.
In fact, if they are properly planned, the new policies, particu larly in the area of new technology, transport and telecommunications should not lead to additional expenditure, but in fact to savings through synergesis and scale.