natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Barbi (PPE). — (IT) Hr. formand, jeg kan tilslutte mig den af Dem foreslåede procedure, eftersom Parlamentet allerede nu går ind for, at afstemningen finder sted onsdag og ikke fredag.
Mr Barbi (PPE). — (IT) Mr President, I agree with the procedure which you propose to follow as long as the House decides here and now that the vote will take place on Wednesday and not on Friday.
Formanden. — Hr. Barbi, i artikel 59 hedder det:
President. — Mr Barbi, Rule 59 stipulates :
Bortset fra de i artikel 48 og 57 omhandlede tilfælde af uopsættelighed kan en tekst kun sættes til forhandling og afstemning, hvis den er indgivet mindst 12 dage før mødeperiodens begyndelse og omdelt mindst 24 timer før.
Except in the cases of urgency referred to in Rule 48 and 59, a debate and vote shall not be opened on a text unless it was tabled not later than 12 days before the beginning of the partsession and distributed at least 24 hours previously.
Formanden. — Jeg beklager meget, at det er umuligt i dette øjeblik at fastslå, hvornår vi kan behandle Arndtbetænkningen, for budgetudvalget holder møde i aften for at udtale sig om kompromisændringsforslagene.
President. — I greatly regret that it is not possible to determine now when the Arendt report will be taken, as the Committee on Budgets is meeting this evening to decide on the compromise amendments.
Så snart jeg er i besiddelse af disse ændringsforslag, vil medlemmerne på deres side få mulighed for at stille ændringsforslag, hvilket allerede gør det yderst usandsynligt, at man kan behandle denne betænkning tirsdag.
As soon as I have received these amendments Members will have to be given the opportunity of tabling their amendments, which makes it highly unlikely that it will be possible to take the report on Tuesday.
Det bliver senest torsdag eller måske sidst på eftermiddagen onsdag.
The earliest it can be taken is Thursday or perhaps Wednesday at the end of the afternoon.
Af hensyn til fristerne er det i praksis umuligt at behandle denne betænkning i morgen.
In view of the deadline it is practically impossible to debate the report tomorrow.
Alt, hvad udvalget skal gøre i aften, er at enes om nogle udvalgs-ændrigsforslag, der, som hr. Arndt siger, vil være et kompromis mellem nogle gamle ændringsforslag, som har foreligget i lang tid.
This means that we shall have to know tomorrow morning what stage has been written before deciding formally to take the report during voting time on Wednesday.
De kan gøre det til den foreliggende tekst, som ikke vil blive ændret.
However, I am quite prepared to do so.
Formanden. — Det betyder i hvert fald, hr. Arndt, at vi først i morgen tidlig ved, hvad budgetudvalget foreslår.
We are dealing with a formal question at the moment and it is sometimes important to take formal consider ations into account.
Formanden stor vægt på at få afstemningen igennem, og vi lægger også megen vægt på at diskutere Nielsen-betænkningen — men ikke samtidig.
Therefore it was tabled a long time ago and, indeed, at the last plenary session it was simply referred back to committee to be re-tabled at the following session.
Det betyder, at den skal genfremsættes, og det er ikke sket endnu.
That means it has to be tabled again, and it has not yet been tabled.
Det er mit eneste formelle problem.
That is my only formal problem.
Jeg går ud fra, den vil blive genfremsat i morgen tidlig.
Tomorrow morning I assume it will be tabled.
Vi kan så træffe afgørelse om den og bestemme, hvornår den skal behandles.
We can decide on it and agree on the time when it should be dealt with.
Imidlertid er det vanskeligt formelt at bestemme om noget, der ikke er fremsat.
However, it is difficult to decide formally on something that has not been tabled.
Den beslutning skal først behandles i udvalget i aften.
That resolution has first to be dealt with by the committee tonight.
Enright (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg ville netop sige præcis det, De så fornuftigt har sagt.
Mr Enright (S). — Mr President, I was going to make exactly the point that you so sensibly have made.
Formanden. — Det er netop det, der blev foreslået, fru Kellett-Bowman.
President. — That is exactly what has been proposed, Mrs Kellett-Bowman.
Oprindelig var den ved en fodnote knyttet til Nielsen-betænkningen, hvilket er lidt underligt, men sådan plejer vi at gøre ved mundtlige forespørgsler med forhandling.
Originally it was tied in as a footnote to the Nielsen report, which is some what curious, but that is the normal way we deal with oral questions with debate.
På grund af den vanskelige forbindelse mellem de to problemer har vi nu en forhandling under ét, men det er to særskilte punkter i den debat.
Because of the difficult link between the two problems we now have a joint debate, but they are separate items in that debate.
Forth (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg ønsker ikke at sinke forsamlingen urimeligt, men jeg mener at de formelt foreslog, at Viehoffbetænkningen skulle på onsdagens dagsorden.
Mr Forth (ED). — Mr President, I do not want to delay the House unduly but I think you formally proposed that the Viehoff report should be on the agenda for Wednesday.
Må jeg formelt gå imod det, hr. formand, bare for at jeg kan bringe min principielle indvending mod det, der er sket, til sin logiske afslutning?
Could I formally oppose that, Mr President, just so that I can carry my objection in principle to what has been done through to its logical conclusion ?
De er så forskellige.
They are so disparate.
De kan lige så godt blande æbler med pærer!
You might as well join apples and pears !
Jeg foreslår, at vi får to særskilte forhandlinger.
I am suggesting that we have two separate debates.
Det er ikke noget problem for mig.
There is a proposal not to accept the Viehoff report for Wednesday.
Så tager vi dem fuldstændig særskilt.
We shall vote on that.
Der er et forslag om ikke at sætte Viehoffbetænkningen på om onsdagen. Det stemmer vi om.
President. — You want to unlink them further than we have already done ?
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg dette som vedtaget.
Are there any objections ?
(Det vedtoges at beholde Viehoffbetænkningen på dags ordenen)
Mr Provan (ED). — On a point of clarification, Mr President.
Provan (ED). — (EN) For tydelighedens skyld, hr. formand: jeg mener De sagde, at vi i afstemningstiden på onsdag skulle se på de beslutninger, hvorom forhandlingen er afsluttet.
I think you said that on Wednesday at voting time we would consider resolutions on which the debate had closed.
Kan De give os et fingerpeg om, hvorvidt det vil omfatte landbrugsbeslutningerne i Currybetænkningen, eller om den faktisk bliver sat til afstemning på torsdag?
Can you give us any indication as to whether that will include the agricultural resolutions in the Curry report or whether that will, in fact, be voted on Thursday ?
Formanden. — Hvis der ikke indtræffer usædvanlige omstændigheder, men planen er, at det skal være torsdag.
President. — Unless there are unusual circum stances, but that is planned for Thursday.
Jeg ved, at dette forslag i formiddags ikke blev støttet af præsidiet, og det skal jeg beklage. Jeg vil imidlertid gerne give en forklaring på grundene til, at jeg bad om, at behandlingen af denne betænkning blev rykket frem.
Mr Deleau (DEP). — (FR) Mr President, the Chairman of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Jacques Moreau, asked you in a letter 10 days ago to bring forward the debate on the report which I am due to present on behalf of the Committee on the European Centre for Small and Mediumsized Undertakings and Craft Industries.
— mundtlig forespørgsel med forhandling (dok.
Debates of the European Parliament
1-765/ 83) tages af dagsordenen for denne mødeperiode.
But none theless I would like to explain why we wished this report to be taken sooner.
Formanden. — Hr. Deleau, vi behandlede Deres anmodning i formiddags og drøftede den længe.
Mr J. Moreau (S), Chairman of the Committee on Economic and Aionetary Affairs. — (FR) Mr President, on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs I wish to support Mr Deleau in his request.
Elaine Kellett-Bowman (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg anser spørgsmålet om europæiske borgeres stemmemulighed ved de europæiske valg for en meget vigtig sag, men jeg synes ikke, den passer særlig godt sammen med Nielsen-betænkningen om vandrende arbejdstagere.
As you know Mr President, I represented you last week in Tilburg, in the Netherlands, and I must leave on Wednesday for Edinburgh to do exactly the same with our British friends.
Jeg vil tillade mig at foreslå, at de to ting behandles hver for sig. I mit land lægger vi meget
And so I cannot be in Edinburgh and at the same time introduce this report here in the House.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
I cannot see any other solution.
14.11.83 betænkningen, vil jeg med glæde gøre det.
Therefore the only possibility left to me is today.
Men jeg har ikke modtaget noget sådant forslag fra økonomiog valutaudvalget.
But I have not received any such proposal from the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs.
Eisma (NI). — (NL) Hr. formand, De bebudede, at Pruvot-betænkningen og Vandemeulebrouckebetænkningen skulle forsvinde fra dagsordenen, men kan De også angive grundene?
Mr Eisma (NI). — (NL) Mr President, you announced that the Pruvot and Vandemeulebroucke reports would be removed from the agenda, but can you tell us why ?
Hvis De altså foreslår mig at tage en af de fire betænkninger fra økonomi- og valutaudvalget af, vil jeg gerne gøre det.
Therefore if you propose that one of the four reports by the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affaires be withdrawn, I shall be happy to comply.
Formanden. — Der er en anmodning om det fra gruppen for teknisk koordinering og forsvar for uafhængige grupper og medlemmer.
President. — It was requested by the Group for the Technical Coordination and Defence of Independent Groups and Members.
Jacques Moreau (S), formand for økonomi- og valuta udvalget. — (FR) Hr. formand, De bringer mig i forlegenhed, thi for en gangs skyld udgør disse betænkninger i dag en slags helhed.
Mr J. Moreau (S), Chairman of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. — (FR) Mr President, this is very awkward because for once today's reports present a certain whole.
De fire betænkninger drejer sig om beskatningsproblemer, og det ville efter min mening være meningsløst at tage en af dem af, for vi ville jo tage en forhandling under ét om disse beskatningsspørgsmål.
The four reports deal with problems of taxation, and I think it would be foolish to withdraw one of them because we wanted to have a joint debate on taxation.
De sætter mig i en situation, som generer mig meget, i betragtning af at jeg uafladelig fremsætter anmodninger om, at der bliver en vis logik i vore debatter.
You are really putting me in a very awkward position in view of the fact that I am constantly asking for a certain logicality in our debates.
Formanden. — Foreslår De at sætte den på.dagsordenen for i dag, hr. Moreau?
President. — Are you proposing that it be entered on today's agenda, Mr Moreau ?
Vandewiele (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg vil bede præsidiet være opmærksomt på den meget vigtige betænkning af fru Viehoff om turisme.
Mr Vandewiele (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, I would ask the Chair to draw the Bureau's attention to the very important report on tourism that has been drawn up by Mrs Viehoff.
Normalt skulle hr. Beumer, formand for udvalget om ungdom, kultur, undervisning, information og sport, der er forhindret, have talt om dette spørgsmål.
Mr Beumer, chairman of the Committee on Youth, Culture, Education, Information and Sport, should normally have spoken on this subject but he is unable to be here.
Jeg har i flere år medvirket til forberedelserne, og jeg drister mig til at appellere til fru Viehoff om at anmode forsamlingen om at udsætte behandlingen af denne betænkning til næste måned.
I have been involved in the preparations for years, and I appeal to Mrs Viehoff to request the Assembly to postpone the debate on this report until next month.
Jacques Moreau (S), formand for økonomi- og valuta udvalget. — (FR) Jeg mener ikke, at denne betænkning kræver ret lang diskussion, og jeg tror, at den vil kunne optages på dagsordenen for i dag.
Mr J. Moreau (S), Chairman of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. — (FR) I do not think that, this report will give rise to a lengthy debate and so I believe it could be included in today's order of business.
Jeg ved ikke, hvor mange medlemmer der agter at tage ordet om betænkningens emne, men jeg tror ikke, der kommer mange indlæg.
I do not know how many Members wish to speak on this report, but I do not think they will be numerous.
Det væsentlige er, at betænkningen bliver vedtaget af Parlamentet.
The most important thing is for the House to adopt this report.
Formanden. — På den baggrund foreslår jeg, at den optages som sidste punkt på dagsordenen for i dag.
President. — In that case I propose to enter it at the end of today's agenda.
Hvis den ikke behandles, sker det automatisk på torsdag.
If it is not considered, it will be taken automatically on Thursday.
Forth (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg må gøre indsigelse.
President. — You can rest assured that tourism will not be dealt with on Thursday night.
Formanden. — Betænkningen er dermed optaget som sidste punkt på dagsordenen for i dag.
As I read the agenda it will be placed on Friday morning's agenda.
Og det drejer sig jo om betænkninger fra økonomi- og valutaudvalget.
The best we can do is place it on Friday's agenda at the earliest.
— efter afstemning om de betænkninger, hvorom forhandlingen er afsluttet, optages Papaefstratioubetænkningen som afslutning på samrådet med Rådet om revisionen af socialfonden.
And there is a fair chance that it will be held over until the beginning of the next partsession considering the length of the agenda which, as things stand at the moment, has been scheduled for Thursday.
Rådet af miljøministre vil formentlig være til stede i mødet fredag, og vi kan da behandle de sager, der blev udsat fra de to mødeperioder i oktober. Det drejer sig om mundtlige forespørgsler
Mr Gautier (S). — (DE) Our question was to be on the agenda for Friday at the last partsession.
— af Johnson for den europæiske demokratiske • gruppe til Rådet om miljøbeskyttelse og udvikling,
Unfortunately another important political decision is to be taken on Friday : the German Social-Democratic Party is to decide on the list of candidates for the European elections and on the installation of missiles on Europe.
Forbundsrepublikken er til diskussion.
Mr Forth (ED). — Mr President, I do object.
Vi anser det for politisk set udpræget umuligt, at en sådan debat finder sted her, uden at socialdemokraterne kan være til stede, selv om vi, som De ved, ellers altid er her fredag formiddag. Derfor beder jeg Dem om at betragte dette som et politisk og ikke et teknisk spørgsmål.
I very much welcomed your original ruling which followed what I think we had established in this House, namely that where a rapporteur could regrettably not be here, it fell to the chairman of the committee to make the appropriate arrangements for the report to be taken. That is the position that the House had agreed.
— af Gautier m.fl. til Kommissionen og til Rådet om bilers udstødning,
Therefore, I hope that the House will adhere to your original ruling and support your original ruling and not accept what is now being proposed.
(Anmodningen om at tage dette punkt af dagsordenen blev ikke imødekommet)
(Parliament approved the President's proposal)
— af Collins for miljøudvalget til Rådet om forbrugerbeskyttelse. gerbeskyttelse.
Since the question was put by Social Democrats alone and none of us is able to be here on Friday morning, regrettably the Commission would have to reply without us, which we do not want.
Gautier (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, hvordan vil De gøre det rent teknisk, når ingen af forespørgerne kan være her fredag formiddag?
I hope therefore that you will help us out of our dilemma.
Jeg vægrer mig meget imod — det siger jeg åbent — at f.eks. en konservativ begrunder vor mundtlige forespørgsel i Parlamentet.
I am not requesting that the matter be placed on the agenda for some other time, only that it be discussed at the next partsession.
Men måske skulle De kontrollere afstemningen elektronisk. tronisk.
Unfortunately we only have a party conference every two years !
Formanden. — Hr. Gautier, hvis forespørgslen tages tilbage, er problemet løst.
President. — The report is therefore entered at the end of today's agenda. It may, however, be taken on Thursday.
von der Vring (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, vil De være venlig at kontrollere afstemningen, for jeg talte det op til, at flertallet var for hr. Gautiers anmodning?
President. — I feel we should avail of the rare opportunity presented by the Council's readiness to answer questions on the environment on Friday and that you should try to find someone to deputize for you as questioner, in view of the fact that the presence of the Council on a day other than Tuesday is a very rare exception.
afstemning bekræftede afstemningsresul
The Papaefstratiou report winding up the conciliation procedure with the Council on the revision of the Social Fund has been entered after the vote on the reports on which the debate has been closed.
Formanden. — Hr. Baudis, jeg takker for Deres bemærkning. Der foreligger en halv snes hastesager fra Rådet i morgen og nogle fra Kommissionen, og Deres betænkning er en del deraf.
The 'environment' Council will probably be present at Friday's sitting at which time we shall consider the matters carried over from the two October part-sessions, i.e. the following oral questions :
Patterson (ED). — (EN) Og nu til noget helt andet: Kan De sige os, hvornår eksemplarer af Papaefstratioubetænkningen på alle sprog vil være til rådighed?
— by Mr Johnson, on behalf of the Christian-Democratic Group, to the Council on the protection of the environment and the development,
Formanden. — Fristen for at stille ændringsforslag er i morgen kl. 13.00.
— by Mr Gautier and others, to the Commission, on motor vehicle exhaust gases,
Gautier (S). — (DE) Allerede i sidste mødeperiode skulle vor forespørgsel stå på fredagens dagsorden.
Mr Gautier (S). — (DE) I believe that you are a President who appreciates political considerations.
Jeg var som altid her om fredagen. Denne gang står den igen på dagsordenen for fredag.
You know that the question of legislation on exhaust gases was originally raised by the German Social Democrats when we were still in power and that this question is being discussed nationwide in Germany.
Beklageligvis skal der på fredag også træffes en anden vigtig politisk beslutning: det tyske socialdemokratiske parti træffer da beslutning om opstilling af sine kandidater til de europæiske valg og om opstilling af raketter i Europa.
We consider it politically unthinkable for a debate of this nature to be held here when it is impossible for Social Democrats to be present, even though, as you know, we are normally always here on Friday mornings. I therefore ask you to treat this as a political question, not a technical one.
Patterson (ED). — (EN) Og må vi bede om eksemplarer af betænkningen inden da?
— by Mr Collins, on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, to the Council, on consumer protection. tion.
Formanden. — Det går jeg ud fra De får.
(Parliament rejected the proposal to delete the item from the agenda)
Da denne forespørgsel kun er stillet af socialdemokrater og ingen af os kan være her fredag formiddag, er det desværre sådan, at Rådet skal besvare den uden os, og det ønsker vi ikke.
Mr Gautier (S). — (DE) Mr President, technically speaking, how can you do this if none of the questioners will be here on Friday ?
Jeg vil ikke anmode om, at der findes en anden plads for den på dagsordenen, men at forespørgslen udsættes til næste mødeperiode.
I am very much against — and I should like to say so quite openly — a Conservative for example introducing our oral question in Parliament.
Desværre har vi kun partikongres hvert andet år!
But perhaps you could verify the result of the vote by the electronic voting system.
Collins (S), formanden for udvalget om miljø- og sund hedsanliggender og forbrugerbeskyttelse. — (EN) To ting: jeg forstår, at Rådet vil anmode om uopsættelighed for Squarcialupi-betænkningen om luftforurening.
Mr Baudis (PPE). — (FR) I should be obliged if you would include on Thursday's or Friday's order of business the report on behalf of the Committee on Transport on the proposal from the Commission of the European Community to the Council for a regulation on granting financial aid under the pluriannual programme on transport infrastructures.
Hvis jeg må komme med to bemærkninger, nu da jeg er oppe at stå, kan det spare tid.
President. — Mr Gautier, if the question is with drawn, the problem will be solved.
Formanden. — Jeg mener, vi skal benytte os af den sjældne lejlighed, at Rådet på fredag kan svare på miljøsprøgsmål, så De skulle forsøge at finde en sted fortræder, for Rådets tilstedeværelse en anden dag end tirsdag er en sjælden undtagelse.
Mr von der Vring (S). — (DE) Mr President, would you please verify the vote electronically, as according to my count the majority was in favour of Mr Gautier's motion.
Gautier (S). — (DE) Det er min opfattelse, at De er en politisk tænkende formand.
President. — Thank you for your comment Mr Baudis.
Sagen er, at Parlamentet virkelig må gøre sin
(The result of the vote was checked electronically)
Collins indflydelse gældende i denne sag.
Mr Patterson (ED). — On a completely different matter : could you tell me when copies of the Papaefstratiou report will be available in all languages ?
Rådet har brugt masser af tid på blot at nå så langt som til en næsten konklusion, og det er det, den mundtlige forespørgsel drejer sig om.
In committee, we had to vote, exceptionally, on a French text without any English text.
Jeg håber derfor, den kan komme op tidligere om fredagen, end det ellers ville være tilfældet.
I hope that will not happen in the plenary, and secondly, when will the deadline for amendments be ?
Det kan De se efter i de to mødedokumenter, og hr. Eismas er klar — det er allerede det ene.
President. — The deadline for amendments will be tomorrow at 1 o'clock in the afternoon.
Deri kan De også se, at samme beslutning ligger til grund for de to betænkninger, og jeg mener, at det er mere fornuftigt, at vi også her koordinerer vort arbejde noget bedre og behandler de ting sammen, der har noget med hinanden at gøre.
I believe you must have received a letter containing a request that the report on tourism be debated earlier on Thursday, partly prompted by the request made by the Commissioner concerned, who can only be here on Thursday and would like to be present for the debate on the report.
(Anmodningen blev imødekommet)
Mr Patterson (ED). — And will we have copies of the report before then, please ?
Formanden. — Hr. Collins, det er der alt sammen taget højde for.
President. — I suppose you will.
Vi skal stemme om uopsættelighed for Squarcialupi-betænk-ningen i morgen tidlig, og det bestemmer dagsordenen for fredag.
To come back to Mr Vandewiele's request : all the committees involved in the report on tourism have submitted their opinions.
Men da rådsformanden formentlig da vil være til stede, vil forespørgslerne og Squarcia-lupi-betænkningen blive taget under ét.
It will not take him long to look at the amendments he has not seen, because there are only two as far as I know.
Formanden. — Hr. Markopoulos' betænkning vil være genstand for afstemning med hensyn til uopsættelighed i morgen, ligesom fru Squarcialupis og andre.
I would therefore ask you once again : have you received the letter requesting that the report on tourism be taken earlier on Thursday, and would you be willing to put this request to the vote ?
Viehoff (S). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg bad allerede om ordet under drøftelsen af torsdagens dagsorden, men så gik De over til fredag.
Mr Collins (S), chairman of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection. — Two things : I understand that the Council will be asking for urgency on the Squarcialupi report on air pollution.