natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bonaccini (COM). — (IT) Jeg vil gerne spørge kom missæren, hvilken forbindelse han ser mellem disse skridt og resultaterne af topmødet i Tokio.
If anyone wishes to have any such points clarified, now is his opportunity.
Patterson (ED). — (EN) Må jeg spørge kommissæren, hvilke kontakter der blev oprettet og hvilke forhandlinger der blev ført med den amerikanske regering under tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne med Spanien og Portugal?
Mr De Vries (LDR). — (NL) Mr President, I should like to begin by thanking the Commissioner for his readiness to leave the committee meeting and to bring Parliament up to date on the situation.
Var det ikke muligt at forudse denne situation? tion?
That is ages ture of a certain elegance which I hold in high esteem.
De hørte i min erklæring, at det ikke drejer om tariffer.
I should like to ask you a question about the future of GATT.
Det er ikke-restriktive foranstaltninger, siger amerikanerne. Vi vil analysere dem.
Or does it mean that an extra appeal will be made to everyone in order to utilize fully the present GAI 1 -mechanisms, which would lead to the American measures being condemned by GATT?
En kvotaordning kan nemlig gennemføres på flere måder, også en ikke-restriktiv.
I note from the list of products that he read out that they are all, broadly speaking, products of what is called in French the industrie agri-alimen-taire.
Det er i sig selv vigtigt, at kvoterne er ikke-restriktive.
There is no exact equivalent in English for that particular phrase.
Selvfølgelig kan man spørge sig selv om, hvad man skal med kvoter, hvis de ikke er restriktive?
Also, the Commissioner mentioned that there will be restrictions in the United States on the import of white wine.
Men det er et spørgsmål, der snarere bør stilles til amerikanerne end til mig.
Does that include restrictions on the import of champagne as well?
Man fortæller os altså, at kvoterne ikke er restriktive, hvilket sige, at de fast sættes således, at de i virkeligheden skulle forbedre vore eksportmuligheder med 20% i forhold til i fjor med undtagelse af hvidvinen, som hr. Habsburg fin der dårlig.
Mr De Gucht (LDR). — (NL) Mr President, the Commissioner pointed out correctly that if the United States of America is not in agreement with particular stipulations of the Treaty of Accession with Spain and Portugal, it should sort out the problem within the framework of GATT.
Det er muligt.
Is that not so in this case?
Det er måske derfor, at hvidvinskvoten er 40% højere i stedet for 20% som for de øvrige varer.
Should the Commission not introduce into the GATT-bodies a procedure in conjunction with bilateral measures with the United States?
Formanden. — Hr. kommissær, vi er Dem meget tak nemlig for, at De her i formiddag har fremsat denne redegørelse.
Mr Pranchère (COM). — (FR) Mr President, I should like to ask at least two questions of the Com missioner.
Det ville glæde mig, hvis De nu ville forsøge at besvare de enkelte spørgsmål.
Those are the imports which have shot up and which, I am informed, do not come under GATT.
De Clercq, medlem af Kommissionen. — (FR) Jeg takker alle dem, der har taget ordet under denne for handling, og jeg har omhyggeligt noteret alle forslagene.
Mr Tzounis (PPE). — (GR) Can the Commissioner tell us what the losses that European exports to the United States will sustain as a result of the restrictions which that country intends to impose, are likely to amount to?
Hr. formand, jeg sætter i høj grad pris på Deres udtryk: »prøve på at besvare de enkelte spørgsmål«.
My second question deals with fats, especially vegetable fats such as American soya, which give rise to 6 million tons of substitute dairy products, yoghourt and cheese.
Jeg vil bestræbe mig på at gøre så godt som muligt.
I wonder, Mr Commissioner, whether you do not think it essential to renegotiate the proposal for taxing fats, excluding milk products?
Det, der er vigtigt, er gennemførelsen, for hvis de amerikanske myndigheder for hele vor eksport kræver bevillinger eller kontrol, vil det selvfølgelig få udvirkninger.
Mr Habsburg (PPE). — (DE) Mr Commissioner, I noticed that the American measures apply exclusively to white wine.
Hvis derimod De forenede Stater be kendtgør de ikke-begrænsende kvoter, som De ken der, og hertil føjer dem, der ikke har krævet indførselsbevilling, så ser billedet helt anderledes ud.
If one looks at the wine market in the United States, one cannot help thinking that we are dealing with measures which have nothing at all to do with the question being discussed here. The Americans are now producing the same quantity of red wine as we are.
Det er vi ved at undersøge i øjeblikket med bistand af vore eksperter.
There is no danger here, and Californian red wine is selling well today.
Lad os derfor ikke foregribe begivenhedernes gang; vi er bekendt med De forenede Staters foranstaltninger.
and there should be this time too — normal negotia­tions within GATT to examine the consequences and possibly the unbinding of certain duties, and all that should take place under normal, calm circumstances.
Vi vil undersøge gennemførelsesbestemmelserne, og det er indlysende, at de forslag, som Kommissionen vil fremsætte for Rådet, hvilket formanden, hr. An driessen, og jeg er blevet bemyndiget til at gøre for et par dage siden, både vil tage hensyn til arten, indholdet og gennemførelsen af de ensidige foranstaltninger, som jeg omtalte.
The United States' unilateral decisions seem to indi­cate a desire to question the very principle of enlarge­ment, whereas in political terms, as has just been said, it is a political fact which sould be welcomed in Wash­ington.
sådant aldrig sket før.
I would like to ask if you have assessed the overall effect of enlargement on trade?
Det drejer sig jo ikke om Fællesskabets første udvidelse, idet der har været to for ud for denne.
Is there a cause and effect link there, or do you think the two should be kept totally apart?
Vi har for øvrigt oprettet toldunionen, som først blev udvidet en gang og så en gang til, således at denne gang er den tredje.
Would the Com­missioner agree that these events underline the folly of competitive subsidization and underline the need for the reform of agricultural policies on both sides of the Atlantic?
Der foreligger altså en praksis, en retspraksis, en sædvane, som altid er blevet accepteret afalle de kontraherende parter, også åf De forenede Stater.
To rush off without hav­ing prepared a programme in relation to what could be the new round of GATT or concerning all the agricul­tural matters involved in EEC-US policy would be an error on our part.
Men man må selvfølgelig er kende, at De forenede Stater ikke på daværende tidspunt havde et underskud på handelsbalancen på 150 mia $.
In the past, the Commission has talked about joint action with the US against Japan. Will it be talking this time about joint action with Japan against the United States?
Jeg har altid sagt, at vi skal reagere på en ikke-provo-kerende måde, men samtidig uden svaghedstegn, det vil sige en parallel eller symmetrisk reaktion, hvis jeg må udtrykke mig sådan, for tydeligt at vise, at vi, selv om vi er åbne for forhandling og forbliver det, ikke vil lade os træde over tæerne, at vi vil respekteres på samme måde som vor økonomis og vort erhvervslivs interesser skal respekteres.
I should also like to ask the Commissioner to spell out in mathematical terms what restrictions were imposed in the form of taxes or additional customs duties on the goods that have been referred to, such as choco­late, wines, beers, etc., so that we in Spain can see what defensive measures might be open to us in due course.
Det forekommer mig, at De forenede Stater er vågnet lidt sent op, når de siger, at de har opdaget ulemper ved udvidelsen eller som følge af den.
How, then, can this measure, which is a natural consequence of the enlargement of the Community, come as a surprise to the American Government?
Faktisk var det først ved udgangen af februar og i marts, at de konkret udtrykte deres kritik eller beklagelser, om De vil, ved for Portugals vedkommende at stille to præcise spørgsmål: for det første tiltrædelsestraktatens forbehold af 15,5% af det portugisiske kornmarked til Fællesskabets øvrige elleve medlemmer og dernæst den nye ordning, der fra 1. marts 1986 skal gælde for den amerikanske eksport af olieholdige frø og sojabønner. ner.
Mr P. Beazley (ED). — Mr President, I would like to follow other speakers in asking whether the decision of the USA conflicts with their previous approval of the enlargement of the Community to include Portu­gal and Spain, as they were fully aware of the condi­tions under which these two countries would join the Community? Can we not therefore point this out clearly to the USA and ask them to withdraw their proposed measures to obviate our having to thake counter-measures?
Det er en af forskellene i forhold til tidligere, og det bør der tages hensyn til, idet det er en af problemets kendsgerninger.
As far as I know, GATT rules cover exceptions to the rule of non-discrimination in the case of forming a customs union. During previous enlargements there were —
Juridisk gør amerikanerne gældende, at vi først burde have indhentet deres samtykke,hvilket er umuligt.
Secondly, do we not have some flexibility on our side, particularly in relation to the importation of animal feedstuffs, especially in the protein sector?
De påstår, at de ikke er blevet under rettet i tilstrækkeligt omfang, hvilket jeg på det be stemteste afviser.
Even inside GATT could we not draw upon this as a retaliation?
I hvert fald fra juli 1985 har alle og enhver — og jeg går ud fra, at den amerikanske informationstjeneste virker, som den skal — kunnet læse betingelserne for Spaniens og Portugals tiltrædelse af Det europæiske Fællesskab.
As for the causes, I ask what agreements are for — and the United States frequently raises the importance of agreements in relation to other fields and other countries — what are agreements for and why are the mechanisms for settling disputes not used?
I øvrigt har vi regelmæssigt — vi, det vil sige Kommissionens tjenestegrene — regelmæssigt underrettet den amerikanske mission i Bruxelles, så amerikanerne kunne følge med i ud viklingen.
Mr Wedekind (PPE). — (DE) Mr Commissioner, would you not agree with me that, when a country adopts certain measures, it is an error to react by adopting countermeasures which are tantamount to war, resulting in a worsening of the situation for both sides?
Derfor afviser jeg denne kritik.
Was it not possible to foresee this particular situation?
Hvis der er foranstaltninger, hvis lovmæssighed man kunne be stride, hvad vi ikke mener, så har man GATT til at tage sig af sagen.
You have had a large number of questions put to you, and I should be glad if you would now attempt to answer them one by one.
Der findes en procedure, der er for handlings- og diskussionsmuligheder, og vi anmoder udtrykkeligt amerikanerne om at benytte dem.
It is unwise, on the eve of important trade negotia tions, to parade in public a family quarrel between the two major participants in this trade round.
Amerikanerne mener, at det vil tage for lang tid i betragtning af deres øjeblikkelige vanskeligheder og valgene i november, og det er det, der har foranlediget dem til at træffe de ensidige foranstaltninger.
I wanted you to be the first to hear it because the press will be interviewing me and I think it improper if while I am in Strasbourg you were to learn my reaction and the Commission's reaction from the press.
Den anden sag vedrører Spanien, hvor amerikanerne ikke vil acceptere, at vi har lavet om på de hidtil gældende ordninger, hvorefter Spanierne faktisk hav de bindings, det vil sige, at de havde accepteret tariffer, som de havde forpligtet sig til i Gatt, hvor vi efter Spaniens tiltrædelse har ændret det hidtidige system til ret og slet gennemførelse af den fælles landbrugspolitiks regler, altså vekslende afgifter på importen af majs og sorgho.
The other problem area concerns Spain where the Americans claim we have changed the previous system whereby the Spaniards had bindings, i.e. had accepted the tariffs agreed to in GATT, whereas on Spain's accession we changed the earlier system to the straightforward application of the CAP rules, in other words variable levies on imports of maize and sorghum.
Men som jeg forklarede, haster denne sag ikke så meget, da De forenede Stater først truer med indførelse af de ensidige foranstaltninger fra 1. juli, og da kun hvis de ikke inden da har opnået den kompensation, som de påstår at være berettiget til.
But this is less urgent, as I already explained, in that the United States are only threatening unilateral measures from 1 July, and that only if we have failed to give them the compensation to which they feel they are entitled.
Sagen er drøftet i GATT siden den 2. maj, hvilket De måske allerede har hørt; sagen om Spanien er derfor ikke helt så presserende, hvorfor De vil tillade mig ikke at sige mere om den nu.
As you may perhaps be aware, this has been under discussion in GATT since 2 May; so there is no immediate urgency on the Spanish question. You will bear with me then, if I leave it at that.
Det tror jeg ikke.
We shall examine them.
Jeg taler ikke om udvirkningerne for den internationale sam handel, da jeg ikke råder over oplysninger.
We may well ask the question: what is the point of quotas if they are not restrictive?
Amerika nerne begyndte med at fremføre fænomenale tal, men har siden hen reduceret dem, idet de dog stadigvæk fastholder, at der er tale om den skade, de kunne komme til at lide som følge af udvidelsen, en skade der beløber sig til en milliard dollar. Er det overdrevet, eller er det det ikke?
But that question should be put to the Americans, not to me. We are told that these quotas are not restrictive, in other words that they will actu ally mean 20% more export opportunities for us than last year, except for white wine, which Mr Habsburg thinks is of poor quality.
Jeg ved det ikke, men det er det tal, der er nævnt.
Our experts are examining this at the moment.
Amerikanerne påstår, at vi ikke blot burde have hørt dem, inden vi undertegnede traktaten om Spaniens og Portugals tiltrædelse, men at vi også burde have indhentet deres samtykke.
The Americans claim that not only should they have been consulted before the Treaty of Accession was signed with Spain and Portugal, but that their agreement should also have been sought.
Det tog imidlertid syv år at nå frem til Portugals og Spaniens tiltrædelse, og jeg kan forestille mig, at der ville være gået yderligere et par år, dersom amerikanerne skulle have deltaget i forhandlingerne fra begyndelsen.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, it took seven years to complete the accession of Portugal and Spain and I can imagine it would have taken many more years if the Americans had been in on the negotiations from the beginning.
Det er praktisk talt helt umuligt, og for øvrigt er noget
That is totally impossible in practice, and it has never been done in the past either.
Så er jeg blevet spurgt, om der består nogen sammen hæng mellem den politiske holdning, som Det euro pæiske Fællesskab har indtaget i den senere tid eller i Tokio.
It seems to me that the United States were rather slow to react when they said that enlargement brought dis advantages in its wake. It was not until the end of February-March that they voiced their criticisms — or
Efter min opfattelse består der ingen sammen hæng.
In legal terms, they claim that we should have asked for their agreement, which is impossible.
Faktisk husker jeg flere udtalelser fra vore amerikanske venner og forhandlingspartnere, der er blevet fremsat i min nærværelse, og hvori de udtalte sig for udvidelsen, for et meget stærkt Europa, for et stærkt økonomisk Fællesskab, idet de dog ikke ville betale prisen derfor.
They claim they were not kept properly informed, which I formally deny. From as far back as July 1985, if not before — and I assume the American information network works normally — everyone has been able to read about the terms of accession of Spain and Portugal to the Community.
Det er ikke os, der, når amerikansk landbrug har det skidt, når i hundredevis af amerikanske landmænd trues af fallit, skal acceptere
And we in the Com mission have regularly briefed the American mission in Brussels, to enable them to follow events. So I reject these accusations.
De Clercq nedskæringer af vor landbrugseksport !
De Clercq think that takes too long, in view of their immediate problems and their deadlines in November, which has led them to take unilateral measures.
Del var amerikanernes ræsonnement.
Are there any budgetary implications?
pr. indbygger, medens vi regner med 20 til 21 mia, hvilket vil sige noget i retning af 2 000, 2 600 eller 2 800 dollar pr. indbygger i indeværende år.
I am certain that the Community will not be top of the league here, because if my information is correct the United States plan to grant some 25 000 or 26 000 million dollars worth of aid to agriculture in 1986, which means about 7 200 dollars per farmer, whereas we are planning, if I am not mistaken, between 20 000 and 21 000 million this year, which means some 2 000 to 2 800 dollars per farmer.
Jeg synes ikke, at vi har noget at bedrejde os selv i forhold til det, amerikanerne gør, for slet ikke at tale om japanerne !
I do not think we are open to criticism com pared with what the Americans are doing, not to men tion the Japanese.
Vi er ikke bange for at gå i lag med landbrugssagen, forudsat at man ikke drager selve grundlaget for den fælles landbrugspolitiks prinsipper og mekanismer i tvivl.
Let us not be afraid then to discuss agriculture, on condition that the basic principles and mechanisms of the common agricultural policy are not called into question.
Vi er rede til at drøfte hele støtteproblemet, hvorom OECD-ministrene for øvrigt har sagt, at det absolut bør behandles i en global sam menhæng.
We are willing to discuss the whole problem of subsidies, which the OECD ministers said, incidentally, should be examined in a very broad context.
Det var mit svar, hr. formand, mine damer og herrer.
That, Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, is what I want to say by way of reply.
Hvis jeg har glemt at besvare nogle spørgsmål, bedes De venligst undskylde mig.
If I have left any question unanswered, I do apologize.
Jeg er selvfølgelig til disposition og takker for Deres opmærksomhed.
I am at your disposal, of course, and thank you for your attention.
Vi mener derfor fortsat, at det er i GATT, at den globale løsning skal findes. Mine damer og herrer, jeg tror, at det vil være en fejl at råbe op om skandale og ikke at gå til GATT.
One question was asked as to whether there was any link with the recent political stances adopted by the European Community or any link with Tokyo?
Tværtimod har vi, der er de mest interesserede i international samhandel, alt at vinde af et nyt og livskraftigt GATT, et styrket og velfungerende GATT; vi har alt at vinde af et åbent, multilateralt frihandelssystem, ikke mindst i vor egenskab af at være verdens største handelsmagt, det bør vi holde os for øje.
Indeed, I well remember several state ments made by our American friends and counterparts which boiled down to this: of course we are in favour of enlargement, of course we are in favour of a very strong Europe and Economic Community, but we are unwilling to pay the price.
I særdeleshed i vor egen interesse, det kan jeg ikke forestille mig, at der skulle være noget forkert i at sige.
I think we should confine the problem to its trade aspects and not extend it to gloomy connotations with other political problems.
Formanden. — Jeg takker Dem, hr. kommissær, for Deres erklæring og for Deres behandling af spørgsmå lene.
President. — Thank you, Mr Commissioner, for your explanations and your handling of the questions.
Dermed er dette punkt uddebatteret, i hvert fald for i dag (').
This item has now been dealt with — at least for today.'
(Mødet hævet kl. 11.20).
(The sitting closedat 11.20a.m.)
Altså ikke specielt, men globalt, ikke ved udelukkende at tale om restitutioner, men ved at lægge alle kortene på bordet; ved at tale om samtlige støtteordninger.
On the contrary, I believe that we who are most involved in international trade have everything to gain from a strong invigorated GATT which works well; we have everything to gain from a system of free trade, an open, multilateral system; we who lead the world in trade must not forget that.
Jeg er sikker på, at Fællesskabet i så henseende ikke ligger på førstepladsen, for hvis mine oplysninger ellers er rigtige, regner De forenede Stater i 1986 med en støtte til landbruget på mellem 25 og 26 mia dollar, hvilket svarer til omkring 7 200 dollar
It is very much in our interest to ensure that GATT works well, and I think we should do everything in our power to ensure that the new round not only gets off the ground but also takes care of our own interests, which I assume I am allowed to say.
(') Parlamentets sammensætning — Udvalgenes sammensætning — Skriftlige erklæringer i artikel 49-registret — Fremsendelse af de i mødeperioden vedtagne beslutningsforslag — Tid og sted for næste mødeperiode: se protokollen.
For items relating to the membership of Parliament, membership of committees, declarations entered in the register under Rule 49, forwarding of resolutions adopted during the sitting, and the dates for the next part-session, see Minutes.
Bestillinger kan afgives til Kontoret for-De europæiske Fællesskabers officielle Publikationer. ner.
Orders may be placed with the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Fuldstændigt referat af møderne fra den 9. til den 13. juni 1986
1986-87 Session Report of Proceedings from 9 to 13 June 1986
Mødet mandag den 9. juni 1986
Sitting of Monday, 9 June 1986
Mødet tirsdag den 10. juni 1986
Sitting of Tuesday, 10 June 1986
Mødet onsdag den 11. juni 1986
Sitting of Wednesday, 11 June 1986
Udgaven på dansk indeholder de danske indlægs originaltekster og den danske oversættelse aftaler holdt på de andre sprog.
The English edition contains the original texts of the interventions in English and an English translation of those made in other languages.
For de oversatte talers vedkommende er det med bogstaver efter talerens navn angivet, hvilket sprog taleren har benyttet: (ES) spansk, (EN) engelsk, (FR) fransk, (GR) græsk, (IT) italiensk, (NL) nederlandsk, (PT) portugisisk, (DE) tysk.
In these cases there are, after the name of the speaker, the following letters, in brackets, to indicate the lan­guage spoken: (ES) for Spanish, (DA) for Danish, (DE) for German, (GR) for Greek, (ER) for French, (IT) for Italian, (NE) for Dutch and (PT) for Portuguese.
Mødet torsdag den 12. juni 1986
Sitting of Thursday, 12 June 1986
Mødet fredag den 13. juni 1986
Sitting of Friday, 13 June 1986
Beslutninger, som er vedtaget under møderne fra den 9. til 13. juni 1986, bekendtgores i De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende C 176 af 14. juli 1986.
Resolutions adopted at sittings of 9 to 13 June 1986 appear in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 17b, 14. 7. ! 986.
Godkendelse af protokollen Arndt
Resumption of the session
FORSÆDE: PIERRE PFLIMLIN en ændring af protokollen og referatet fra dagen før, altså torsdag.
IN THE CHAIR: MR PFLIMLIN
(Protokollen godkendtes)^)
The President answered that this would be investigated.
Formanden. — Jeg erklærer Europa-Parlamentets ses sion, der blev afbrudt den 16. maj 1986, for genop taget.
President. — Thank you Mr Arndt; I had not been personally informed until today about this incident.
Arndt (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, i protokollen for den 16. maj står der på side 1 :
(Parliament approved the minutes)1
(') Andragender — Tilladelse til al udarbejde betænkning — Henvisning til udvalg — Ændrede udvalgshenvisninger — Bevillingsoverforsler — Skriftlige erklæringer i artikel 49-registret — Samrådsprocedure — Modtagne dokumenter — Tekster til aftaler sendt af Rådet — Udvalgenes sammensætning — Par lamentets sammensætning: se protokollen.
Petitions — Authorization to draw up reports — Referral to committees — Changes in referral — Transfers of appropriations — Written declarations (Rule 49) — Conciliation pro cedure— Documents received— Texts of treaties forwarded by the Council — Membership of committees — Membership of Parliament : see Minutes.