natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Om begrundelsen er der ganske vist ikke blevet stemt i udvalget, men den er blevet lige så grundigt drøftet som beslutningsforslaget.
It is true that the explanatory statement was not put to the vote in com mittee, but it and the motion for a resolution were discussed together.
Betænkningen blev enstemmigt vedtaget, altså også begrundelsen, Havde der været noget i den, som De ikke syntes om, havde De haft tid nok til at bringe det på tale i energi, forsknings- og teknologiudvalget.
The report was adopted unanimously, and that included the explanatory statement. If there was anything in it that you did not like, there was plenty of time for you to say so in the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology.
I øvrigt er det gan ske logisk; i beslutningsforslaget står der ikke andet end i begrundelsen, for beslutningsforslaget er ikke blevet ændret særlig meget i udvalget.
Besides — and this is what really counts — there is nothing in the motion for a resolution that is different from the explanatory statement, because no major changes were made to the motion for a resolution in the committee.
Det svarer til det, som jeg oprindelig fremlagde, jeg skriver jo ikke to forskellige ting.
It is basically the same as the one I originally submitted. I am not in the habit of writing two different versions of the same document.
Med hensyn til det, man nu vil, så er det for sent. Det skulle De have ordnet i udvalget.
It is anyway too late to bring this up at this stage.
Sagen er færdigbehandlet, og betænkningen er en stemmigt vedtaget.
The time for that is past and the report has been unanimously adopted.
Tjernobyl har — på tragisk måde — bevist menneskets manglende evne til at styre kræfter, som på et vist tidspunkt er undsluppet dets kontrol.
President. — Mr Pearce, you refer to Rule 100, and it is quite true that the content of that rule is as you have just explained it.
Det står klart, at der kræves en stor støtte, meget større end den nuværende, til forskning i teknologien på dette område.
Mr Poniatowski (LDR), Chairman of the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology. — (FR) Madam President, if I may comment as chairman of the com mittee, I wish to stress that it was the motion for a resolution that was voted — unanimously, incidentally — by my committee.
Poniatowski (LDR), formand for energi, forskningsog teknologiudvalget. — (FR) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne tage ordet som formand for udvalget og under strege, at det er beslutningsforslaget, der er blevet enstemmigt vedtaget af mit udvalg, men der har hverken været debat eller afstemning om begrundelsen.
Mr Pearce (ED). — Madam President, you seem to be saying that a rapporteur can write anything he or she likes in the explanatory statement.
Jeg mener også, at det er korrekt, at en oplysning af offentligheden vil medvirke væsentligt til at bevidst gøre Europas borgere om de muligheder, vi har i kraft af de alternative energikilder, og gøre det muligt for dem at deltage i administrationen og kontrollen af de organisationer, som vi vil oprette, navnlig på lokalt plan, men også på nationalt plan.
Therefore, while it is correct, as you say, that we do not vote on the explanatory statement, Rule 100 says quite clearly that the explanatory statement must be in agreement with the text of the resolution. In this case it is not, and for that reason I urge that the explanatory statement be removed so that nobody in
Herman (PPE). — (FR) Fru formand, jeg er enig med hr. Poniatowski.
Mr Herman (PPE). — (FR) Madam President, I support what Mr Poniatowski has just said.
Med hensyn til en anden ting påpeges det af Kom missionen, at menneskene i dag har overdrevent store ambitioner, hvad angår denne energisektor.
Herman committees vote on explanatory statements; this is why they are not forwarded elsewhere, unlike resolutions. Mrs Bloch von Blottnitz still has something to learn about her job.
Per sonlig tror jeg, at menneskene, dagens borgere, gør absolut ret i at have disse ambitioner, fordi de føler, at netop her er en udvej, som garanterer menneskets overlevelse, fjernt fra kernekraftens farlige vej.
I also consider that to inform the public will be of great assistance in making Europe's citizens aware of the potential offered by alternative forms of energy, and will help them to participate in the management and control of the organisations that must be created, mainly at a local level, but also nationally.
Det er klart, at hvis man ville gå i gang med at undersøge begrundelserne, ville der naturligvis være forskellige vurderinger af det ene eller andet punkt.
Concerning another point, the Commission notes that nowadays people are excessively ambitious about the energy sector.
Men eftersom det i energiudvalget lykkedes at finde frem til en formulering af beslutningen, der på en afbalanceret måde tager hensyn til alle de udtrykte opfattelser, vil vi gentage vores påskønnelse og til slutning.
Personally, I believe that people, today's citizens, are entirely justified in their ambitions, because they feel that somewhere in this direction is the escape-route which guarantees our survival well away from the dangerous path of nuclear energy.
Vi er derfor generelt enige i, at man bør støtte forsøgene på at udnytte de nye, vedvarende energikilder, og dette mål er også indeholdt i ordførerens betænkning.
President. — Mrs Bloch von Blottnitz, I will repeat my proposal to you.
Vi har dog følgende kommentarer hertil:
And I do believe that it is genuinely in line with the Rules of Procedure.
Peter Beazley (ED). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg er glad for, at beslutningsforslaget, sådan som det er blevet forelagt for Parlamentet, har været beskedent.
Mr Beazley, Peter (ED). — Madam President, I am pleased that the form of this resolution as presented to the House has been modest in its claims.
Dette er rigtigt, for skønt der er behov for studier af brugen af ny og vedvarende energi, bør dette spørgsmål afgøres under hensyntagen til gennemførlighed og om kostninger og ikke ud fra rent politiske motiver.
This is correct because, whilst there is a proper place for studies into the use of new and renewable energy resources, it should be determined by feasibility and cost considerations and not by purely political ones.
Der for var det rigtigt af Kommissionen at begrænse finansieringen af disse undersøgelser, for det er klart, at mulighederne for økonomisk gevinst ved at udvikle denne form for energi er yderst begrænsede.
The Commission was therefore correct in limiting the extent to which these should be funded, because it is manifest that the prospects for developing this type of energy economically are distinctly restricted.
Men jeg må protestere mod det, som ordføreren sagde i sit indlæg om elkabelforbindelsen mellem Frankrig og Storbritannien via Kanalen.
I must, however, contest the point made by the rapporteur in her speech on the channel electricity link between France and Britain.
Det må ethvert tænkende menneske støtte fuldt ud lige så vel som andre metoder til overførsel af energi fra den ene medlems stat til den anden med det formål at sænke industriens omkostninger og drage fordel af medlem skabet af Det europæiske Fællesskab.
This must receive the full support of any thinking person as must any other means of moving energy from Member State to Member State, to lower industrial costs and take advantage of the fact of being a member of the European Community.
Desuden er det i modstrid med den enkelte medlemsstats suveræne ret til national planlægning, naturligvis inden for de internationale rammer og muligheder.
I believe that the rapid development of renewable sources of energy is something that both Europe and the world as a whole need more now, than ever before.
Der er endnu en stor fordel i dette tilfælde.
Further, there is another great benefit in this particular case.
Spidsbelastningen for energiforbruget i Frankrig og Storbritannien indtræffer ikke på samme tidspunkt, så el kraften kan overføres fra det ene land til det andet og så føres tilbage igen, hvilket vil medføre enorme be sparelser.
The peaks of energy consumption in France and Britain occur at different times, so that the electrical power can be directed from one to the other and then reversed with enormous savings in capital costs.
Jeg kan kun beklage, at mit land har be grænset omfanget af denne udveksling på grund af den betydelig lavere pris, som Frankrig kan eksportere elektricitet til i forhold til den, der betales for Storbritanniens egen produktion.
I can only regret that my own country has restricted the extent of this exchange because of the considerably lower price at which France can export electricity than that paid for the British indigenous supplies.
b) Vi er enige i, at ekspertgruppen bør indeholde re præsentanter for miljøorganisationer, men mener, at også repræsentanter for de lokale myndigheder bør deltage.
Chernobyl proved, in the most tragic way, how incapable we are of dealing with forces which, beyond a certain point, get out of control.
c) Hvis man udelukkende ønsker udvikling af de nye, vedvarende energikilder, løses ikke de alvor lige energiproblemer, og derfor burde Fællesskabet i langt højere grad gribe inde med finansiel støtte.
If we are to implement a policy of exploiting alternative forms of energy, we will have to adopt a series of measures which will promote new targets in connection with energy.
Vi mener, at disse midler bør fordeles i forhold til de generelle muligheder for udnyttelse af sol- og vindenergi, jordvarme osv.
The relevant programmes for the next few years must gradually acquire a new orientation, in other words the diversion of greater sums towards small-scale technologies that can use renewable sources of energy.
Afslutningsvis vil jeg sige, at man i rimeligt omfang bør fortsætte forskningen i udnyttelsen af vedvarende energi, men man må se objektivt på sagen.
In conclusion, the further investigation of the use of renewable energy resources has its proper place, but it must be considered objectively.
Det moderne Europa har ikke plads til hjemmestrikkede irrationelle holdninger til energispørgsmålene. Vi bør ikke leve med overtro som i middelalderen.
Modern Europe has no place for homespun irrational attitudes to the sources of energy.
Vore beslutninger angående energikilderne må baseres på omkostninger, relevans og en verdensomfattende risikoanalyse, og man må se på sagen ud fra en euro pæisk synsvinkel.
Our decision on the sources of energy production must be based on cost, relevance and a world-based risk analysis and it must be seen from a European point of view.
Vi må benytte vor store teknologi ske formåen her i Europa til fordomsfrit at udforske alle den moderne teknologis muligheder, og vort valg må træffes ud fra rationelle overvejelser.
We must use our great European scientific capability to explore all the possibilities of modern technology without prejudice, and our choice must be determined by rational thinking.
d) Man bør især støtte udviklingen af den relevante teknologi i de mindre udviklede lande, hvilket vi også støttede i vort ændringsforslag, for ellers risikerer vi at disse lande finansierer store foretagender i Fællesskabets udviklede lande.
For this policy to succeed, it is urgently necessary to create Community research centres, particularly in countries such as Greece, whose geographical position offers huge advantages for the development of renewable energy sources.
Pasty (RDE). — (FR) Fru formand, kære kolleger, gruppen kan ikke tilslutte sig forslaget til beslutning i hr. Linkohrs betænkning.
(Parliament adopted the resolution)
Jeg skal ikke komme tilbage til de argumenter, som mine kolleger i går uddybede for og imod bioethanolproduktion.
Obviously, if we wanted to go into reasons, we should naturally find differences of appraisal regarding one point or another.
Jeg vil hermed sige, at lancering på markedet af bioethanol på forskningens og de tekniske og økonomiske vilkårs nuværende stade vil være at foregribe begivenheder nes gang, idet det vil kræve investeringer og tilskud på flere milliarder, hvilket Fællesskabet ikke er i stand til i øjeblikket.
But since in the debate in the Com mittee on Energy a way of wording the resolution was found that takes into account, in a balanced manner, all the opinions expressed, we repeat once again our appreciation and support for the resolution.
Følgelig beklager vi, at man på grundlag af en ufuldkommen undersøgelse og — det skal siges i forbifarten — en lidt for imødekommende holdning over for olieinteresserne i betænkningens argumentation i alt væsentligt genfinder de forslag, der af et italiensk olieselskab er sendt til alle Europa-Parlamentets medlemmer.
Mr Alavanos (COM). — (GR), in writing. Within the scope of differentiating between the various sources of energy, and with the aim of reducing our dependence, we assign particular importance to the development of new and renewable energy resources, despite the problems still remaining (high interest rates for capital investment in relation to its yield, and low technological level); problems, however, which are not insoluble within the framework of a longterm strategy.
Af disse grunde mener vi, at denne betænkning savner objektivitet, og at Parlamentet derfor bør forkaste den.
In general terms, then, we agree that support should be given to efforts to develop new and renewable energy sources, an aim which is also contained in the rapporteur's report.
Produktionen af bioethanol skulle få den velgørende virkning, at den ikke blot opsuger så meget som muligt af vore overskud, men også bevæger sig i ret ning af fællesskabsdirektivet om blyfri benzin.
Mr Pasty (RDE). — (FR) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, our group will be unable to support the motion for a resolution in Mr Linkohr's report.
End videre vil den sikre vor energimæssige uafhængighed, eller i hvert fald gøre os mindre afhængige, samtidig med at den føleligt og varigt vil forbedre landbrugets indkomster.
While we are quite willing to accept that it is appropriate to adopt a cautious approach to a problem such as this, which is very controversial, we find it unacceptable for the rapporteur himself to have discarded caution by inviting the House to vote for paragraph 3 in his motion for a resolution, which is a firm, categorical and final condemnation of production of bioethanol from agricultural raw materials.
Guermeur (RDE). — (FR) Til forretningsordenen, fru formand. Hvis jeg er rigtigt underrettet, har afstemningen fundet sted, medens et af Parlamentets udvalg holdt møde.
(A) We do not agree with amendment No 4 in the Commission's document concerning uniform Com mon legislation in this sector, because it disregards the special features and the polymorphic nature of what concerns energy sources in relation to local conditions.
En række ændringsforslag er imidlertid enten blevet forkastet eller vedtaget med en meget lille margen.
Also, because it conflicts with the sovereign right of every Member State to plan its own national pro gramme, of course within international frameworks and potentials.
Endvidere vil en sådan produktion genskabe nogle af de arbejdspladser, der er gået tabt som følge af land brugets mekanisering og de tekniske fremskridt.
We even think that this attitude is linked to the known orientation towards the uniform definition of the cost of electrical energy, on the basis of Community criteria, an attitude with which we disagree. agree.
Det er aldeles uacceptabelt, at en afstemning af så stor betydning finder sted, medens nogle kolleger er til udvalgsmøde.
We take the view, in fact, that it is wrong to base arguments on the current trend on the market in petroleum products, which could very well go the other way.
Jeg kunne ønske, at afstemningen om betænkningen som helhed blev udsat til et tids punkt, hvor der ikke afholdes udvalgsmøder, og at man i fremtiden undgår at afholde udvalgsmøder un der afstemningerne.
Not so many years ago we saw the market moving in the opposite direction, and if the arrange ments made since by the Commission of the European Communities to allow industrialists to take advantage of the world prices of raw materials — cereals or sugar — had then been in force, bioethanol production from agricultural materials would have got under way at the time.
I betragtning af betydningen af land brugsudvalgets fornuftige ændringsforslag, som blev forkastet, vil de franske medlemmmer af gruppen stemme imod betænkningen.
(B) We agree that the group of experts should include representatives from bodies connected with environmental protection, and believe that representatives of local government should also participate.
Formanden. — Det er meget beklageligt, hr. Guermeur, men jeg kan ikke gå ind for Deres forslag, idet afstemningstiderne nøje har været oplyst.
For these reasons, we consider that this report lacks objectivity and should be rejected by the House.
Pranchère (COM). — (FR) Fru formand, hel eller delvis erstatning af benzin med ethanol kan ikke komme på tale i EF, idet det er og bliver landmændenes primære opgave at frembringe fødevarer.
(C) Considered in isolation, the desire to develop new and renewable energy sources does not solve the serious related problems, and the Community's financial intervention should therefore be upgraded.
Deveze (DR). — (FR) Fru formand, kære kolleger, hr. Linkohrs betænkning anser fællesskabsstøtten til
(D) Special support should be given to the develop ment of relevant technology in the less well-developed countries, as we point out in our amendment, because
Inden for EF kan det kun overvejes at fremstille ethanol med henblik på erstatning af benzinens blyind-
Mr Guermeur (RDE). — (FR) On the procedural motion, Madam President, if my information is correct, the vote took place while one of Parliament's
Men derfor overser vi ikke de økonomiske og finansielle problemer og virkningerne for miljøet.
Moreover, this production would create jobs to replace the many which have been lost as a result of mechanization and technical progress in farming.
Ligesom med mælk. således vil det snart foregå med bioethanol.
I for my part hope that the overall vote will be taken at a time when no com­mittees are sitting and that, in future, committee meet­ings will not be held during voting.
1 ton kvælstof koster 2 tons olie, store arealer med korn. roer. majs og kartofler vil man bombardere med tonsvis af kvælstof, og kredsløbet bliver således: af olie laves korn osv., og af korn laves igen olie.
However, any decision on this subject will have to take account of the very thorough work done by the Committee on Agriculture and the amendments that it has tabled, which we find absolutely apposite.
Af selve dette kredsløb drager kapitalmagerne maksimal nytte. For de drager også på ny nytte af produktet bioethanol. Energi vil jo bli ve knap og derfor dyr.
In view of the number of commonsense amendments proposed by the Committee on Agriculture which have been rejected, the French Members of our group will vote against the report.
Socialisten Linkohr gør opmærksom på farerne.
President. — I am very sorry, Mr Guermeur, but I cannot agree with what you propose.
Derfor støtter vi grønne hans beslut ningsforslag.
The voting times have been very clearly indicated.
Under de nuværende forhold forbyder olieprisens lave niveau umiddelbar fremstilling af ethanol i industriel målestok. Derfor bør døren dog ikke lukkes for denne produktion, idet erfaringen viser, at olieprisens udsving mange gange ikke er til at forudse.
Mr Pranchère (COM). — (FR) Madam President, the total or partial substitution of ethanol for petrol cannot be envisaged in the EEC, because the priority for farming is and must remain to supply food.
Med hensyn til virkningerne for miljøet bør undersøgelsesarbejdet fortsættes på grundlag af pilotprojekter. ter.
In the EEC, ethanol production can be envisaged only as a replacement for lead in petrol, to improve octane ratings, or as a cosolvent of methanol.
Med forkastelsen af landbrugsudvalgets ændringsforslag er den endelige beslutning for partiel og for par tisk, idet den faktisk er ensbetydende med en for dømmelse af ethanolproduktionen, hvilket er en ind stilling, der kun kan glæde olieselskaberne.
Mr Deveze (DR). —■ (FR) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Mr Linkohr's report finds that Com­munity subsidies for bioethanol production would be too costly at this stage and comes down against large­scale production from organic materials such as cereals, potatoes or sugar­beet.
Graefe zu Baringdorf (ARC). — (DE) Fru formand, under overskriften »I de fattige lande bærer bønderne byrden« er i alle større aviser en rapport fra Verdens banken blevet trykt, som henleder opmærksomheden på navnlig de mange millioner småbønders vanskelige situation.
There are many advantages: a contribution to the campaign against atmospheric pollution, savings of foreign exchange through greater independence from external energy suppliers and manufacture of protein­rich by­products, and maintenance or expansion of employment in farming areas.
Af denne overskrift kunne man måske slutte, at det her går flertallet af landmænd godt.
However, this does not mean that we can disregard the economic and finan­cial problems, or the environmental repercussions.
Nordmann (LDR). — (FR) Fru formand, jeg havde gerne stemt for hr. Linkohrs betænkning, fordi den på en række punkter har den fortjeneste at være realistisk ved at komme ind på rentabiliteten.
Under current conditions, the low level of oil prices rules out ethanol production on an industrial scale in the immediate future.
Men des værre modsætter den sig brugen af landbrugsoverskuddene til fremstilling af bioethanol og fratager derfor denne produktion enhver fremtidsudsigt.
This is not to say that the door must be shut, since there can be unpredictable fluctua­tions in oil prices, as we know from experience.
Dertil ville talemåden fra landbruget i DDR passe: »Uden Gud og solskin bringer vi høsten i hus«, her: bringer vi landbrugsråstoffet til ethanol i hus.
I do not propose to go over the arguments advanced by Honourable Members yesterday, both for and against ethanol production.
Det er en forkert udvikling.
You know what they are, and in fact there is no real debate.
Vi skal drive landbrug med henblik på produktion af fødevarer. Derfor skal vi afvise denne udvikling med bioethanol og støtte Linkohrbetænkningen — med forbehold som lige nævnt.
I simply mean that it would be premature, in the present state of research and technical, economic and financial conditions, to launch bioethanol on the market, since it would entail investment and subsidies running into billions, which the Community is currently unable to afford.
Fejlen ved hr. Linkohrs betænkning er netop, at den retter heftige angreb mod fremtiden!
With the rejection of the Committee on Agriculture's amendments, the motion for a resolution in its final form is incomplete and lacking in impartiality, because it amounts in practice to writing off all possibility of ethanol production, and the only people to take joy from that would be the oil companies.
Verbeek (ARC). — (NL) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne forklare, hvorfor håbet om bioethanol som brændstof er så farligt, og i hvis interesse produktionen ligger.
Nevertheless, we are adamant that substantial funding must be allocated to research on bioethanol produc­tion from the EEC's agricultural surpluses.
Først og fremmest kapitalmagere kaster sig over det te; de begynder at producere det samme kredsløb, som nu finder sted med mælk.
This research must be one of the Community's top priori­ties, as an integral part of the common agricultural policy.
Se, landbrugsindustrien laver smør og skummetmælkspulver af mælk, og af disse overskud laver de igen mælk, f.eks. til kalven,
We have to get the cost of production down to a level low enough for it to become viable and compet­itive with oil.
Späth (PPE). — (DE) Fru formand, mine damer og herrer, det europæiske folkepartis gruppe beklager meget, at vore særdeles moderate ændringsforslag, som tager sigte på enighed, til punkterne 3, 4.
Mr Nordmann (LDR). — (FR) Madam President, I should have liked to have been able to vote for Mr Linkohr's report, because on certain points it has the merit of taking a realistic look at the cost­effec­tiveness problem.
5 og 6 ikke blev vedtaget.
Alas, however, it rules out all possi­