natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vi er af den opfattelse, at denne detalje med tilføjelsen giver de berørte partnere mulighed for på en bedre måde .at overveje situati­onen, når dechargen ikke straks meddeles, for at undgå en yderligere tilspidsning af situationen.
We feel that, in the event of the discharge not being granted forthwith, the annex would make it possible for all the parties concerned to put their heads together, both within their own institution and with all the other bodies in question, thus averting further escalation.
Alt i alt vil vi gerne takke hr. Price for, at han med sit arbejde har peget i den rigtige retning.
We should like to thank Mr Price for having pointed us in the right direction.
Vi følgeri det store hele med glæde hans forslag.
By and large we will be happy to ' follow his guidance.
Richard, Medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Parlamen­tets forretningsorden er selvfølgelig helt og holdent et internt parlamentsanliggende, men der findes nok punkter, hvor Kommissionen måske skal gøre sin holdning klar, når — som i dette tilfælde — bestem­melserne i henhold til fællesskabsretten berører forholdet mellem institutionerne.
Mr Richard, Member of the Commission. — Parliament's Rules of Procedure are, of course, entirely a matter for Parliament itself, but there are, I think, issues upon which the Commission, perhaps, needs to make its position clear when, as in this one under Community law they affect relations between the institutions. tutions.
En skelnen mellem på den ene side en udsættelse og på den anden side nægtelsen; der tales helt klart om en definitiv nægtelse, og dette er, som jeg sagde før, efter vor opfattelse umuligt.
What we say is that the refusal to grant a discharge, in fact, can serve as an analysis that can help in the preparation of future budgets by evaluating policies and that it may possibly lead to a motion of censure.
Når man taler om finans­förvaltning, stilles der forslag til et budget i år χ—1, det gennemføres i år χ og behandles i Revisionsret­tens beretning i år χ +1 med henblik på, at der skal gives decharge i år χ+ 2.
I believe that is the thinking not only of the lawyers who have to discuss this point — and whom we consulted in Brussels just recently — but of the Commission too.
Uden en decharge ville proceduren være ufuldkommen, idet regnskaberne for år χ skal afsluttes for at kunne danne et solidt grundlag for budgetterne for de kommende år.
It seems to me to be more in conformity with the spirit and the legal framework of our institutions, and the Socialist Group wanted to point that out.
Desuden er saldoen fra et givet regnskabsår del af budgetprovenuet og skal på et eller andet tidspunkt udmøntes i et enkelt tal, således at balancen mellem udgifter og indtægter, som fastlagt i traktaten, kan opretholdes.
This is indeed why it is proposing an amendment, in Mr Sieglerschmidt's name, which gives details and raises the possibility of a motion of censure, although the two should not be linked. There is no similarity between the two.
Lad mig først og fremmest slå fast, at den nuværende udgave af forretningsordenen indeholder en proce­dure om at nægte at give decharge.
May I say first of all that the current version of the Rules contains a procedure for refusal to grant a discharge.
Kommissionen har jo aldrig gjort indsigelse herimod, og det håber jeg, at Parlamentet vil anse for tilstrækkeligt bevis for, at man ikke betvivler Parlamentets beføjelser til at nægte at give decharge for gennemførelsen af budgettet.
Now the Commission has never raised any objection to this, which I hope Parliament will accept as being proof enough that it does not question Parliament's power to refuse to grant a discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget.
Resten af det, jeg har at sige, vil heller ikke betyde, at Kommissionen nu har ændret opfattelse i denne sag — slet ikke.
Nor does the rest of what I shall be saying imply that the Commission has changed its mind on this point — not at all.
Man anerkender fortsat Parla­mentets ret til at nægte at give decharge.
It continues to recognize Parliament's power to refuse to grant a discharge.
Årsagen til, at Kommissionen har ønsket at tage ordet til hr. Prices betænkning, er ganske enkelt, at hans forslag — ved at indføre en skelnen mellem udsættelsen af dechargen og det at nægte at give decharge — giver mulighed for definitivt at nægte at give decharge.
The reason why the Commission wished to speak to Mr Price's report is simply that by making a distinction between the postponement of a discharge and refusal of a discharge, his proposal provides for a definitive refusal to grant a discharge. I emphasize the word 'definitive', if I may, since this is precisely, in the Commission's view, what it amounts to.
Slutteligt har alle de personer, der er involveret i gennemførelsen af budgettet og forberedelse af regn­skaberne — befuldmægtigede, modtagere af for­skudsbetalinger, finanskontrollører og revisorer i alle institutioner — er stort ansvar.
Those, Mr President, are the points the Socialist Group wanted to make and, having made them, it will vote in favour of the proposal for a decision.
Det har de selvføl­gelig, men de har også rettigheder, herunder retten til at forsvare sig, som man ville antaste, hvis man defini­tivt nægtede decharge.
Mr Malangré (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I am speaking on behalf of my group and I can be very brief.
Deres forfattere har ikke nedfældet muligheden for definitivt at nægte at give decharge.
Their authors made no provision for a definitive refusal to grand a discharge.
De poli­tiske sanktioner, der er nedfældet i traktaterne, hvad angår en vurdering af Kommissionens gennemførelse, forbliver intakte.
Had they wished to, they could have written such a possibility into the texts, stating in what manner and on what grounds it could be done.
Richard at det ville være på sin plads, at Europa-Parlamentet så på hele spørgsmålet om Sovjetblokkens aktivitet på tværs af landegrænserne, om ufine hemmelige aktiviteter på multinational basis, der bevæger sig tværs over vore svagtbevogtede grænser fra fællesskabsland til fællesskabsland.
During consideration in the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions, some members rightly pointed out that the Treaties do provide a power of refusal in certain cases, such as that of the budget, but the purpose of discharge basically is to provide a means of evaluating the Commission's implementa­tion of the budget in accordance with Article 205 of the EEC Treaty and checking the soundness of its financial management on the basis of the accounts and financial statements presented by the Commis­sion for the year in question.
Price-forslaget, der stiler mod eller for den sags skyld begrænser Parlamentets politiske beføjelser.
Nothing in the Commission's view of Mr Price's proposal is intended to limit or indeed could limit Parliament's political powers.
Tvært imod mener Kommissionen, at Parlamentet, hvis det ønsker at reagere politisk i en sådan situation, slet ikke har behov for at indføre et juridisk instrument i sin foretningsorden — dvs. en definitiv nægtelse af decharge — hvilket efter vor opfattelse ville give anledning til unødvendige problemer i fællesskabs retten.
On the contrary, the Commission feels that Parliament, if it wants to react politically in a matter of this sort, has no need whatsoever to introduce into its Rules of Procedure a legal instrument — namely the definitive refusal to grant a discharge — which, in our view, would pose unnecessary problems of Community law.
Vor betænkning er resultatet af en undersøgelse og en opsummering af de informationer, Deres ordfører har indsamlet.
Discharge is the natural, final and, indeed, essential stage in the budget's life.
Den kan opdeles under tre hovedpunkter.
The context in which it has to be seen, in our view, is the evaluation of financial management.
Den første er industrispionage, og der må vi jo ganske særligt minde om det ekstraordinært store antal på 71 sovjetiske diplomater, der blev udvist i løbet af 1983, 46 af dem fra Frankrig i en velkendt masseudvisning og resten fra de fleste af vore medlemslande.
Mr President, in that Mr Price's new version makes a distinction, in our view, not to be found in the current Rules of Procedure between postponement on the one hand and refusal on the other hand, it clearly provides for definitive refusal, and this, as I said a moment ago, is, in our view, impossible.
Der er aldrig forekommet udvisninger af sovjetiske embedsmænd i sådant et omfang i noget andet år.
In terms of financial management, the budget is drafted in the year χ ­ 1, is implemented in the year χ and is reported on in the year χ +1 by the Court of Auditors with a view to a discharge being granted in the year χ+ 2.
Jeg tror ikke, det er et tilfældigt sammen træf, at den tidligere leder af KGB i netop det år for en kort periode var den politiske leder af Sovjetunionen. unionen.
Moreover, the balance from a financial year is part of budgetary revenue and must at some time become a firm figure so that the balance between revenue and expenditure laid down in the Treaty can be maintained.
Price (ED), ordfører. — (EN) Måske kommissæren, som jeg forsøgte at afbryde lige før han sluttede, vil besvare to spørgsmål.
Mr Price (ED), rapporteur. — I wonder whether the Commissioner, whom I sought to interrupt just before he concluded, would answer two questions.
Hr. formand, han henviste i sit indlæg gentagne gange til en definitiv nægtelse.
He has, Mr President, in the course of his speech repeatedly referred to a definitive refusal.
Er han enig i, at der ikke noget som helst sted i den tekst, der er forelagt Parlamentet, forekommer ordet »definitiv«, og at jeg i min tale tidligere gjorde det helt klart, at Parlamentet ved at acceptere denne ændring ikke vil tage stilling til, om man på et senere tidspunkt vil vende tilbage til en nægtelse eller senere give decharge — med andre ord, at, jeg udtrykkeligt sagde, at det spørgsmål stod åbent?
Would he confirm that nowhere in the draft text being put to Parliament does the word 'definitive' occur, and that I, in my speech earlier on, made it expressly clear that in accepting this change Parliament would not be taking any posi­tion as to whether later it would return to a refusal or later grant the discharge — in other words, that I was expressly saying that that question was open ?
Er han også enig i, at godkendelse af regnskaberne kan ske i et forslag om at nægte at give decharge, og at godkendelsen hvad angår størstedelen af kontiene, nemlig EUGFL, finder sted flere år efter decharge er givet?
Would he also accept that clearance of the accounts could be done in a motion refusing discharge and furthermore, with regard to the bulk of the accounts, the EAGGF, that the clearance of the figures takes several years after a discharge has been granted ?
Vil Kommissionen være så venlig at bekræfte disse punkter?
Would he confirm those points please ?
Det andet punkt er sovjetbloklandenes forsøg på misinformation, på at så ufred mellem de vestlige allierede og De forenede Stater i særdeleshed. Jeg har givet eksempler på forsøg på at tilbyde information — forfalskede dokumenter til journalister, fjernsynsprogrammer, falske telefonopringninger, bånd, andre eksempler på sammenbryggede oplysninger, der tilsigter at ødelægge forholdet mellem Fællesskabets lande internt og mellem os og vore allierede.
Lastly, all those involved in implementing the budget and preparing the accounts — authorizing officers, imprest holders, financial controllers and accounting officers of all the institutions — have major responsi­bilities.
Der er eksempler på agenter, der arbejder på sovjetblokkens vegne mod betaling og på frontorganisationer, dvs. internationale organisationer, der påstår at arbejde på grundlag af frivillige bidrag, men som rent faktisk modtager midler fra fremmede magter.
Mr Price's proposal to that effect would seem, in our view, to be inconsistent with important Treaty rules and with the Financial Regulation, and these must continue to be observed.
Richard, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, det forekommer mig, at ingen af de rejste punkter behører at blive bekræftet af Kommissionen.
Mr Richard, Member of the Commission. — Mr Presi­dent, it seems to me that neither of those points needs confirmation by the Commission.
Det er kendsgerningen.
They are matters of record.
Det første tema, som det ærede medlem rejser over for mig, om hvad han sagde til forsamlingen og hvad, der står i dokumentet, det har forsamlingen selv hørt, og den kan også læse.
On the first of the points made to me by the honourable gentleman, what he said to the House and what is in the document, the House has heard, and the House can read.
Det andet er en sag, for så vidt jeg opfatter det, der vedrører hr. Prices analyse af den nuværende finansmæssige praksis i Fællesskabets institutioner.
The second part is a matter, as I understand it, of Mr Price's analysis of current finan­cial practices in the institutions of the Community.
Det forekommer mig endnu en gang at være faktiske forhold, der ikke kræver en fortolkning fra min side her i formiddag.
Again, it seems to me, those are matters of record which do not call for interpretation by me this morning.
Der er også stærke formodninger om, at der var en forbindelse mellem de De Røde Brigader i Italien og de tjekkoslovakiske myndigheder. En bestemt hændelse ved den østrigsk-tjekkoslovakiske grænse er jo nok et fingerpeg i den retning. Men de værste eksempler kommer fra Bulgarien.
Under the legislation to which I have referred, Parliament has every opportunity of accom­panying its decisions to grant a discharge by whatever
Det er selvfølgelig dem selv, der bestemmer, hvad der en national befrielsesbevægelse.
President. — The next item is the report (Doc.
Det er da klart, alle ved, at man kun har brug for tre grundlæggende kvalifikationer for at komme ind i det engelske efterretningsvæsen.
German terrorists working together with Palestinian terrorists.
For det første må man have gået på en public school.
There are also strong hints that there were links between the Red Brigades in Italy and the Czechoslovak authorities.
For det tredje er man nok nødt til at være russisk spion!
I think it is beyond reasonable doubt that the Bulgarian secret police, probably with the know ledge of the Soviet police, have carried out murderous attacks on Bulgarian citizens in our Community countries — one in Denmark, one in France and the third in the United Kingdom.
Det er rækkefølgen.
This is in line with Bulgarian law.
Jeg kunne godt tænke mig at udfordre lord Bethell til at fortælle os, hvor mange kulminearbejdere, hvor mange stålarbejdere, der har vist sig at være russiske spioner.
They believe that they have the right to carry out such attacks on their own citizens outside their own borders.
Hvis man vil finde ud af, hvor de russiske spioner er, så besøg de engelske public schools eller tag til universitetet i Cambridge — en ren spionskole!
Their support for terrorist movements, as outlined in my report, fits in very well with their support for national liberation movements . They, of course, decide what is a national liberation movement.
Sandsynligvis har de konservative som helhed med deres baggrund flere venner i det russiske efterretningsvæsen end Tjernenko selv!
Lord Bethell (ED), rapporteur. — Mr President, I welcome the chance to introduce this report, which was initiated by Italian colleagues in the wake of the terrible murderous attack on His Holiness, the Pope.
Sådan forholder det sig ikke.
That is not so.
Men jeg opfordrer ethvert medlem her til at benægte fakta i min betænkning. Dette er ikke en James Bond-film. Dette er ikke spionromaner eller detektivhistorier.
However, I challenge any honourable Member, including the Socialists opposite, to deny the facts in my report.
Det er fakta.
They are facts.
På grundlag af disse kendsgerninger, som jeg mener, jeg har fremlagt på en sober og tilbageholdende måde, vil jeg opfordre forsamlingen til at stemme for denne betænkning.
On the basis of these facts, which I think I have outlined in a sober and restrained way, I would invite the House to vote and approve this report.
Alavanos (COM). — (GR) Hr. formand, jeg har et indlæg til forretningsordenen.
Our report is the result of an investigation and a summary of the information that has come to your rapporteur's attention.
Jeg vil gerne spørge, om KGB også står bag Kiesling-skandalen, som har rystet både Vesttyskland og hele den europæiske offentlighed. lighed.
There have never been expulsions of Soviet officials on this scale in any other year.
Formanden. — Hr. Alavanos, det var ikke et indlæg til forretningsordenen.
I think it is no coincidence that in that particular year a former head of the KGB was briefly the political leader of the Soviet Union.
Rogers (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg har tøvet meget med at tage ordet til denne betænkning i dag, hovedsageligt fordi det er en meningsløs betænkning uden nogen faktisk værdi eller betydning.
Mr Rogers (S). — Mr President, I was very reluctant to speak on this report today, mainly because it is a nonsensical report and really of no value and no significance at all.
Desuden er det ikke noget, der kommer denne forsamling ved.
Besides that, it is not the business of this Assembly.
Jeg er ikke klar over, siden hvornår Parlamentet har tiltaget sig retten til at dømme om sådanne emner.
I do not know since when this Assembly has taken unto itself the right to judge such issues.
Vi har været vidner til en trinvis forskydning af de nationale parlamenters rettigheder til Europa-Parlamentet, og jeg kan ikke se, hvad diskussioner af denne slags er værd.
We have seen a gradual shift of national parliaments' functions to this so-called European Parliament, and what the value of discussing matters of this kind is, I do not know.
Vi burde se at komme videre med vore egne anliggender, diskutere landbrugspriser og løse krisen i Fællesskaberne i stedet for at sprede vor opmærksomhed ud over hele verden, der ikke umiddelbart kommer os ved.
We should be getting on with our own business, discussing farm prices and solving the crisis in the Community, instead of dissipating our attention all around the world on issues which do not immediately concern us.
Habsburg (PPE). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg har netop med interesse lyttet til hr. Rogers og kan kun sige Dem, at når man har nået min alder, har man alle rede hørt det hele før.
Under the second heading we had Soviet bloc attempts at disinformation, at sowing discord between Western allies, particularly between Western Europe and the United States.
Det er alt sammen forkert, tror jeg.
The third and final category is the most serious, and that is terrorism.
I sine sidste taler har Alexander Solsjenitsyn — og han kender ved Gud til situationen — entydigt sagt, at den tredje verdens krig for længst er begyndt, blot at den ikke udkæmpes med de våben af i forgårs, som nogle venter på skal blive brugt, men tværtimod med under gravende aktiviteter, med politik, med afledningsmanøvrer.
I am not able to draw any conclusion about the attack on the Pope's life, because that is still under investigation in Italy.
Og derfor er det så prisværdigt, at lord Bethell har rettet vor opmærksomhed mod denne situation, nemlig har gjort os det klart, at det her drejer sig om en konflikt, hvor instrumenterne fra politikken, propagandaen, den undergravende virksomhed anvendes.
However, there can be no doubt that in the past there have been indirect links between the Soviet Union and various West European terrorist organizations.
Nærværende betænkning beskæftiger sig naturligvis kun med spørgsmålene om under gravende virksomhed, men der findes jo også i tillæg
It is true, for instance, that the terrorists Baader and Meinhof were trained in Jordan in 1970 at a Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine camp and that in the wake of that there was a series of terrorost outrages in Europe carried out by
Det er en meningsløs betænkning, og mine konservative venner her i salen er godt klare over det.
It is a nonsense report and my Conservative friends here really know this.
Hvis man indsatte USA og CIA i stedet for Moskva eller Rusland, hver gang de nævnes i teksten, ville resultatet blive nøjagtigt det samme.
If one were to substitute the USA and the CIA for Moscow or Russia everytime they are mentioned in the report, the result would be exactly the same.
Begge spiller med i det samme spil, begge har de samme tåbeligheder for.
Both of them are playing at the same game, both are up to the same nonsense.
Derfor er netop denne betænkning det rene vås.
That is why this particular report is an absolute nonsense.
Den bygger på en masse fordomme.
It starts from a basis of prejudice.
Selv om den er meningsløs i sig selv, er den farlig.
Nonsense though it may be in itself, it is dangerous.
Det er farligt, at Parlamentet beskæftiger sig med betænkningen, og at lord Bethell, ordføreren, foregøgler os, at den er en objektiv analyse af de problemer, vore lande står over for på sikkerhedsområdet.
It is dangerous that this Parliament should be considering this report and that Lord Bethell, the rapporteur, should be pretending that it is an objective analysis of the problems that face countries in the security field.
I mit eget land har vi oplevet en sådan manifestation for ganske nyligt.
Of course, there is a motive for this on the part of the
viteter begrænser sig ikke til diplomatiske mål, men retter sig mod indsamling af informationer om teknologiske og videnskabelige fremskridt i de industrialiserede lande.
know what he is talking about, said clearly that the Third World War began long age, but not, as some people still seem to think, with outdated weapons but with subversion, politics and diversionary tactics.
Parlamentet burde være lord Bethell taknemmelig for det mod, han har udvist ved at afsløre nogle af de aktiviteter, som offentligheden synes at være så uvidende om.
This report only deals with subversion, but there are other areas, for example the whole question of East-West trade, governed by political criteria.
Det er op til udenrigsministrene at gribe til foranstaltninger for at sikre, at vor frihed i Vesten beskyttes og ikke undergraves af sådanne aktiviteter
People must realize that totalitarianism cannot be judged in terms of a parliamentary democracy, but must be seen for what it is : there is no real difference between Adolf Hitler's ideology and that of those in power in the Soviet Union today.
Lady Elles (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg var forbløffet over hr. Rogers indlæg, når man tager det antal beslutninger i betragtning, som den socialistiske gruppe har støttet angående international terrorisme og de aktiviteter, der finder sted inden for Fællesskaberne.
Lady Elles (ED). — Mr President, I was amazed at Mr Rogers' statement, considering the number of resolutions that have been supported by the Socialist Group on international terrorism and the activities taking place within the Community.
Det er lige netop det, lord Bethells betænkning drejer sig om.
This is exactly what Lord Bethell's report is all about.
Måske tilbringer Allan Rogers nu så megen tid i Westminster, at han ikke har haft tid til at læse betænkningen, selv om han er blevet udpeget til at tale på den socialistiske gruppes vegne.
Perhaps Allan Rogers spends so much time now at Westminster that he has not had time to read the report, although he has been put up to speak on behalf of the Socialist Group.
Men han burde da virkelig kende til de terroristiske aktiviteter, der foregår i Vesteuropa.
But he really should be aware of the terrorist activities that go on in Western Europe.
Det er lige netop Europa-Parlamentets funktion.
This is precisely the function of this Parliament.
Jeg er klar over, at han har forsaget forsamlingen for Westminster, men så skulle han måske ikke tage ordet mere her i Parlamentet.
I know he has abandoned this House for Westminster, but then perhaps he should not speak in this Parliament any more.
I Parlamentet har vi allerede på grundlag af beslut ninger udarbejdet af hr. Rogers egen gruppe diskuteret et aspekt af den sovjetiske militære aggression mod Vesten.
Mr Alavanos (COM). — (GR) Mr President, I would like to put a question on a point of order.