natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Schleicher (PPE). — (DE) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, riiin gruppe går som bekendt ind for at benytte videnskab og teknik til gavn for menneskene, og således at alle risici for sundheden og alle skadelige påvirkninger af miljøet så vidt muligt udelukkes.
Mrs Schleicher (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, my group is well-known for its support for the use of science and technology for the welfare of mankind, a corollary of which is that all health risks and damage to the environment must be eliminated as far as possible.
Falconer (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, må jeg for det første gøre Dem opmærksom på, at denne betænkningsoverskrift er ukorrekt, eftersom den også bør indbefatte ordene »og svag radioaktivitets mulig virkning på arbejdstagere og deres familier i Fifeområdet«.
Mr Falconer (S). — Mr President, can I first of all draw your attention to the fact that the heading of this report is incorrect since it sould also include the words 'and the possible effects of low-level radiation on workers and their families within the Fife area'.
Må jeg også gøre Dem opmærksom på 8. led, der omtaler loven af 1964. Der skal stå loven af 1969.
Can I also' draw your attention to the eighth indent which refers to 'the 1964 Act'; that should read 'the 1969 Act'.
Disse ting er sekretariatet flere gange gjort op mærksom på, men af en eller anden grund bliver det stadig skrevet forkert.
These matters have been drawn to the attention of the Secretariat on several occasions but for some reason they keep being misprinted.
Af den grund går vi også ind for at benytte atomenergi til fredelige formål, dét vil sige til at udvinde energi.
That is why we also support the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, that is to say, for the generation of energy.
Som råstoffattig region på den ene side og højt industrialiseret område på den anden hår Europa et påtrængende behov for billig energi til gavn for sine mennesker.
As an area that is at once highly industrial ized and at the same time deficient in raw materials, Europe is heavily dependent on cheap energy for the welfare and prosperity of its people.
Oparbejdningen som led i atomenergiudnyttelsen er omstridt, idet det dog ikke ér den viden skabelige bedømmelse, der er udslaggivende, men den politiske.
Nuclear fuel reprocessing is a highly controversial subject, even though this is an area in which political judgments weigh much more heavily than scientific judgments.
I to lande i Det europæiske Fællesskab er denne teknik hidtil blevet anvendt, nemlig i Fränkrig i La Hague ög i Storbritannien i Sellafield.
This is a technique that has been applied so far only in two countries of the European Community, namely, in La Hague in France and Sellafield in the United Kingdom.
I Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland er der også for nylig truffet afgørelse om at bygge et oparbejdningsanlæg.
In the Federal Republic of Germany a decision has also been taken recently to go ahead with the con struction of a reprocessing plant.
Jeg vil hu henlede Deres opmærksomhed på de aspekter af denne betænkning, som interesserer mig og medlemmerne af min gruppe.
I would now draw your attention to the elements of this particular report which are of concern to myself and to the members of my group.
Det er interessant at iagttage de mennesker, der støtter Sellafields fortsættelse.
It is interesting to note the people who want to support the continuation of Sellafield.
Det er også interessant at iagttage, hvordan navnet skiftede fra Windscale til Sellafield.
It is also interesting to note how that name changed from Windscale to Sellafield.
Tilsyneladende efdet en måde at fjerne problemet på!
Apparently it is one way of removing the problem!
Det er også interessant at iagttage, at BNFL fik en bøde på 10 000 £ fór at dumpe sit affald i haVet ud for Sellafield, meris Greenpeace, der prøvede at forhindre BNFL i at durripe dette affald, fik bøder på i alt 50 000£.
It is also interesting to note that the BNFL were fined £ 10 000 for dumping their waste in the sea off Sellafield, whilst Greenpeace who were trying to prevent them dumping that waste was fined a total of £ 50 000.
Det synes jeg er temmelig uretfærdigt over for folk, der bekymrer sig om miljøet.
That I think is a rather unjust measure to be meted out to people who are interested in the environment.
Falconer med til at bære byrden ved denne gift og forurening på grund af de uansvarlige instanser og regeringer, der uden videre tillader dumpning.
And this view is shared by all the small non-nuclear States who have to put up with this poison and misery occasioned by irresponsible agencies and governments that simply go ahead and authorize dumping.
en kopi af denne attest skal fremsendes til sundhedsog sikkerhedsmyndighederne. Hr. formand, i 1979 og 1980 gjorde the Transport and General Workers Union det britiske forsvarsministerium opmærksom på, at det ikke overholdt denne del af loven.
Can I ask the House and you, Mr President, to look at those areas which are covered by my resolution.
Vi fik i 1980 forsikring om, at dette problem var løst, og at man nu overholdt loven.
We were given assurances in 1980 that this problem was resolved and that the act was now being complied with.
Denne garanti blev ført til protokols i 1980 i skibsværftsarbejdernes LO, som jeg var medlem af.
That assurance was minuted in 1980 at the Ship building Trade Union Council of which I was a member. ber.
To af disse små stater i Stillethayet, Nauru og Kiribati, har i forbindelse med The London Dumping Convention anmpdet om, at man når frem til et stop for dumpning af atomaffald ved at optage atomaffald i bilag I til The London Dumping Convention, altså som skadelige stoffer, som ikke længere må dumpes. Fra den 23. til den 27. september i år skal man drøfte dette i London.
Two of the small Pacific states, Nauru and Kiribati have within the framework of the London Dumping Convention, called for an end to the dumping of nuclear material by the inclusion of nuclear materials in Annex I of the London Dumping Convention. This is to say it is harmful substances that are no longer to be dumped.
Det er af allerstørste;betydning,,at anmodningen fra disse to stater, behandles samtidig med anmodningen fra Europa-Parlamentet, der alle rede tidligere har sagt,, .at det ikke ønsker nogen dumpning, og at Det europæiske Fællesskabs med lemsstater sarnmen, om muligt sammen med Kom missionen, støtter denne anmodning fra de to stater.
It is of the utmost import ance that the request of these two States, together with the request of the European Parliament, which has also declared in the past that it wants no dumping, should be included in the discussion and that the Member States of the European Community together, and if possible with the Commission, should support the request by the two States.
Hr. formand, det appellerer jeg om.
I strongly urge that this be done.
Må jeg fortælle Dem en bitte historie om mig selv?
Mr President, can I tell you a wee story about myself?
Jeg forlod faget, da jeg blev valgt til denne høje for samling i juni 1984.
I left the industry when I was elected to this esteemed body in June 1984.
Jeg ventede tålmodigt på, at min helbredsattest skulle dumpe gennem brevsprækken i min dør i Burnside Street 22, Rosyth.
I waited patiently for my transfer records to pop through my door at 22 Burnside Street, Rosyth.
Jeg mente, at hvis nogen ville få deres helbredsattest, så måtte det være mig!
I thought, if anybody is going to get the transfer records it will be me!
Den kom ikke!
They did not appear!
Langt om længe måtte jeg efter at have kontaktet sundheds- og sikkerhedsmyndighederne uden at have fået svar fra dem endnu en gang skrive til dem og minde dem om, at attesten ikke var kommet. Endelig kom den så.
Even tually, after contacting the health and safety executive and getting no response from them, I had to write to them again reminding them that the records were not there.
Vi kan ikke tillade, at vore folies sundhed og sikkerhed gøres afhængig af bureaukrater, der ikke er interesserede i vore folks demokratiske krav.
We cannot allow the health and safety of our people to be determined by bureaucrats who are not interested in the democratic demands of our people.
Når hr. Paisley siger, at vi må bygge på kendsgerninger, må jeg så sige til hr. Paisley...
When Mr Paisley says it must be based on facts, can I say to Mr Paisley . . .
Adam (S). - (EN) Hr. formand, fru Bloch von Blottnitz' betænkning er utrolig dårligt skrevet.
Mr Adam (S). — Mr President, Mrs Bloch von Blottnitz's report is extremely badly written.
Henstillingerne og bemærkningerne i den strider imod hinanden.
The recommendations and the observations within it are contradictory.
Det er overhovedet ikke klart, om betænkningen opfordrer til en permanent eller en midlertidig lukning af anlægget, eller, hvis det er en midlertidig lukning, under hvilke omstændigheder genåbning kan tænkes.
It is not at all clear whether the report is calling for the permanent or temporary closure of the plant nor, if it is a temporary closure, in what circumstances reopening would be countenanced.
Jeg er dødtræt af de såkaldte eksperter òg deres kendsgerninger.
I am fed up with so-called experts and their facts.
Til syvende og sidst er det arbejder klassen i Storbritannien og i andre lande, der får disse kendsgerninger præsenteret i ligkister, og det er på tide, at der bliver sat en stopper for det.
At the end of the day the working-class people of this country and others have seen these facts lined up in coffins and it is time that a halt was called.
Betænkningen og beslutningsforslaget indeholder overhovedet ingen henvisninger til de normer, der er fastsat af det internationale strålebeskyttelsesråd.
The resolution and the report contain no reference whatsoever to the standards set by the international radiation protection board.
Der foretages ingen, sammenligning mellem Sellafield og noget andet atomanlæg i hele Fællesskabet.
There are no comparisons between Sellafield and any other nuclear installation in the whole of the European Community.
Betænk ningen er,vag med hensyn til, hvordan den vil have Paris-konventionens forslag gennemført.
The report is vague on the way in which it wants to see the Paris Convention proposals implemented.
Meget vigtigere er, hr. formand, at fru Bloch von Blottnitz' betænkning ikke omtaler den rapport fra det rådgiyende udvalg om radioaktivt affald, som blev offentliggjort i juni i år.
Very much more to the point, Mr President, Mrs Bloch von Blottnitz's report makes no mention of the report by the Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee which was published in June of this year.
Denne, rapport har et helt kapitel om Sellafield og giver detaljer om den •væsentlige formindskeíse^af radioaktivt udslip, der allerede er nået, og om de ekstra kontrolforanstaltninger i forbindelse med den udledningstilladelse, som trådte i kraft den 1. januar i år.
That report has a whole chapter devoted to Sellafield and gives details of the "significant reductions in radioactive discharges already achieved and the extra controls imposed by the site discharge authorization
The London Dumping Convention's videnskabelige komité har regnet ud, at losningerne af nukleart affald i det nordøstlige Atlanterhav efter en vis tid vil forårsage tusind dødsfald.
Mr Muntingh (S). — (NL) Mr President, radioactive waste material is persistent, it is non-biodegradable and it is toxic.
Dette kunne måske gælde for disse store atommagter, men det gælder bestemt ikke for Parlamentet her, der tidligere flere gange har udtalt, at det ikke ønsker nogen som helst dumpning af atomaffald i havet. Det gælder heller ikke for alle de små ikke-atommagter, som skal være
No one knows what to do with it and thus the nuclear energy undertakings defer the problem and try to get rid of the waste by siting it where it causes them the least trouble and where they can share the risk with others.
Vi har hørt, at fru Bloch van Blottnitz ikke har besøgt anlægget. Hun har i hvert fald ikke rådspurgt de lokale myndigheder i området.
That is why this stuff is dis charged into the air and into the water and, if possible, dumped somewhere else in the world.
Adam sikre Parlamentet om, at vore tjenestegrene allerede deltager i arbejdet i Det forenede Kongerige og fortsat vil gøre det.
That report also has a look at the expenditure on the further measures that are being taken to reduce radioactive discharges.
Kofnmissionéri Vil foretage sin egen vur­dering af alle resultater fra opfølgriingsundersøgelser på baggrund af Black­rapporten og den vil ganske af­gjort undersøge behovet for yderligere foranstaltning­er på fællesskabsplan.
The amount which the current programme calls for is £ 250 m and the report notes that that expenditure will prevent one or two cancer deaths in all probability over the next 10 000 years. That is the level of control and action that is being taken at the present time and it is for those reasons that I have supported amendments which delete the reference to closure of this particular plant.
mig, at hans kommunalbestyrelse er tilfreds med, hvad der er gjort og er ved at blive gjort af anlægget for at formindske radioaktivt udslip.
England but also because the United Kingdom Government is the sole shareholder of the company owning and operating the plant — British Nuclear Fuels Ltd.
Hvis disse ændringsforslag bliver vedtaget, vil jeg støtte betænkningens vedtagelse.
I think, if I may say so in parenthesis, that Mrs Faith was a little hard in suggesting, indeed asserting, that the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection has totally ignored reference to the Black Committee.
Det er blevet sagt under denne forhandling, og efter min opfattelse med rette, at selv i områder med høj arbejdsløshed — og der er alt for mange af dem i Fællesskabet i dag — må hensynet til beskæftigelsen underordnes hensynet til folkesundheden i tilfælde, hvor dér ér fastslået en klar og udbredt fare for folke­sundheden.
All this is not to say that the Commission, and indeed the Community, have no role to play in an affair of this kind.
Dette må virkelig være hævet over en­hver tvivl.
The report before Parliament calls on the Commission to take certain actions.
Men naturligvis må vi se på allé detaljer i' denne sag, og dét agter jeg at gøre i dette indlæg.
I assure Parliament that our services already contribute to work in the United Kingdom and will continue so to do.
Folkesund­heden skal optage Parlamentet.
We have heard that Mrs Bloch von Blottnitz did not go to the plant.
Vi har kunriet trække på de lokale medlemmers opfattelse, og de har måske et lidt andet syn på tingene end andre.
She certainly did not consult with the local authorities in the area.
Men frem for alt tror jeg, vi har et troværdighedsproblem, og om det vil jég gerne indlede mine bemærkninger.
For those reasons I believe that we should allow the plant to continue but that we should also recognize the very justifiable concerns of public opinion and that we should support the call, which is included in the amendments, for European Community standards of radioactive emission and control.
Disse ting giver anledning til reel uro, og man får alt for ofte én følelse af, at sandheden camoufleres bag ekspertjargon.
We have had the benefit of the views of local Members, who per haps have taken a somewhat different view from that of others.
Deres uro dæmpes ikke af fagre brd fra offentlige myndigheder, der ofte blot skal berolige dem, men ikke informere dem.
Above all, I think, we have a problem of credibility, and it is on that note that I should like to begin my remarks.
Dér er én meget vigtig faktor, som man må tage i betragtning, og som nogle medlemmer slet ikke har nævnt.
There is one very important factor that has emerged, a factor which has to be recognized and which some Members did not allude to at all.
Det er det forhold, at ejerne af Sellafield­anlægget — BNFL — er blevet retsforfulgt ved lands­retten i England og er blevet idømt en bøde.
That is that the own ers of the Sellafield plant — British Nuclear Fuels — have been prosecuted in the Crown Court in England, convicted and fined.
Det er ikke uvæsentligt.
That is not an unimportant mat ter.
Retssagen mod selskabet — en strafferetssag — varede i syv uger.
The trial of the company — a criminal trial — lasted seven weeks.
Den drejede sig om et stærkt radioaktivt udslip i november 1983 i Det irske Hav fra Sellafield­anlægget.
It related to the release in November 1983 of highly radioactive material into the Irish sea from the Sellafield plant.
Efter Kommis­sionens opfattelse rejser det materiale, som kom frem under retssagen og på basis af hvilket selskabet blev dømt for fire lovovertrædelser, en række vigtige! spørgsmål.
In the view of the Com mission the evidence brought forward at the trial, on the basis of which the company was convicted of four offences, raises a number of important questions.
Dette gælder i særlig grad, hvis man sam­menholder dette materiale med det, som dækkes af udvalgsbetænkningen.
This is especially so if the evidence is considered alongside the facts covered in the committee's report
Faktum er, at der har været så mange industriulykker eller næsten­ulykker, forud for hvilke de ansvarlige har udtalt noget, som man bagefter kan se kun har været en halv sandhed.
There is a great deal of public anxiety in general terms about the manufacture, disposal and transportation of dangerous substances and waste.
Så der er desværre en trovær­dighedskløft, og vi må spørge os selv hvorfor.
These matters do give rise to genuine concern, and people too often have the feeling that truth is camouflaged by jargon.
Vi må må spørge os selv, hvad der er galt, og frem for alt hvordan vi kan rette op på situationen.
Their fears are not allayed by anodyne statements from public authorities which are frequently meant to calm but not to inform.
Disse nor­mer ér indeholdt i direktiver, der fastsætter maksima­le grænser for de strålingsdoser, man må udsættes for som en direkte eller indirekte følge af atomindu­striens virksomhed.
The fact is that there have been too many industrial disasters or near disasters which have been preceded by what in retrospect appear to be half-truths from those responsible.
De fastlægger også de grundprin­cipper, der gælder for lægetilsynet.
So, regrettably, there is a credibility gap in matters of this kind, and we must ask ourselves why.
Direktiverne un­derkastes regelmæssig revision i lyset af de teoretiske og teknologiske fremskridt.
We must ask ourselves what is wrong, and, above all, how can we remedy the situation?
Vi beskæftiger os i denne forhandling med et umåde­lig vigtigt emne, der alt for ofte ér hyllet i mystik, og kun delvis fordi det er teknisk indviklet.
We are dealing in this debate with an immensely important subject, all too often shrouded in mystery, and that only partly because of its technical complex ity.
Så det var op til den britiske regering at reagere på de første rapporter om den usædvanlig høje kræfthyp­pighed i Sellafield­området og at foretage Sig noget. Det, den britiske regering gjorde, var at hedsætte Black­udvalget og deriiæst gennemføre dets henstil­linger.
The matters treated by the report fall largely within the responsibility, of course, of the United Kingdom Government, not only because the nuclear reprocessing plant in question is in the north-west of
Fællesska­bets regler for strålingsbeskyttelse består derfor af to elementer.
Before referring to these questions perhaps I may explain the framework of current Community policy on radiological protection.
Jeg understreger dette, fordi det er af deri største vigtighed for forhandlingen her i dag.
The Euratom Treaty pro vides for basic standards of radiation protection of the health of workers and of the general public.
Hermed vil jeg ikke sig* at Kommissionen og faktisk også Fællesskabet ikke bør spille en rolle i en sådan sag.
These standards are set out in directives laying down maximum permissible levels for exposure arising directly or indirectly from industrial activities.
Clinton Davis flydende og faste stoffer tilbage i oparbejdningsanlæg get; det var af den grund, at man fandt, at anlægget havde overtrådt ALARA-bestemmelsen.
The Parliament may recall that the most recent revisions were the subject of your opinions in 1982 and 1984 before adoption by the Council last September.
Det første element er følgende : at de maksimumsgrænser for bestråling, der er indeholdt i Fællesskabets direktiver, skal optages i den nationale lovgivning.
Instead, a slick formed and the danger that some had been washed ashore causing radioactive hotspots on beaches led to the beaches being closed whilst checks were being carried out.
Man bør bemærke, at Sellafield på infet tids punkt, siden det blev sat i gang i 1950, har overskredet disse tilladte maksimumsgrænser.
Hotspots, had they existed, might have posed a potential hazard to the general public.
For det fjerde : Hvor meget radioaktivt materiale blev der udledt i havet?
Thirdly, could the discharge have been avoided?
Det ser ud til, at der blev udledt 4 500 curie fra oparbejdningsanlægget til tanken.
The jury at the trial concluded that the answer was quite clearly yes, and that all the liquid and solids could have been pumped back into the reprocessing plant.
Men det lader sig ikke beregne, hvor meget af dette der blev pumpet ud i havet, eftersofn registreringen viste sig at være utilstrækkelig.
It was for this reason that the plant was found to have con travened the ALARA requirement.
Det andet punkt er, at anlæggene inden for disse grænser er underlagt det såkaldte ALARA-princip, det krav at udslippet skal holdes så lavt som det med rimelighed kan.
They are also subject to the requirements that all exposure to radiation is to be justified by the benefits and that they be kept as low as reasonably achievable within the stated maximum.
Dette fører naturnødvendigt til, at der stilles forskellige krav til forskellige anlæg.
I stress this because it is extremely important to the debate which we are holding today.
Når jeg har sagt det, kommer jeg til selve retssagen i landsretten.
The first element is this: that maximum permissible levels of exposure which are contained in Community directives are taken up in national legislation.
Ejerne af Sellafield-anlægget blev dømt for overtrædelse af betingelserne i tilladelsen til drift af et atomanlæg og for ikke at have overholdt de
It should be noted that at no time since it was set up in 1950 has Sellafield exceeded these maximum permissible levels.
; begrænsninger eller betingelser der fremgik af tilladel
This necessarily leads to different requirements for different plants.
For det femte: Blev offentligheden advaret om den forøgede strålingsrisiko som følge af disse udslip?
Fifth, was the public warned of the increased risk of exposure to radiation as a result of these discharges?
Juryen fandt, at anlægget havde undladt at træffe alle rimelige foranstaltninger for at begrænse strålingsrisi-, koen for offentligheden, og det er meget alvorligt.
The jury decided that the plant had failed to take all reasonable steps to minimize the exposure of the public to radiation, and that is a serious finding.
Som jeg allerede har sagt, blev de lokale strande først senere lukket for offentligheden, mens der blev fore taget undersøgelser.
As I have already said, the local beaches were only later closed to the public while checks were made.
sen til bortskafning af radioaktivt affald.
Having said that, I come to the trial itself in the Crown Court.
Jeg tror, at det, der skete, kan opsummeres som følger : På grund af en bogholderimæssig fejl blev der udledt en mæng de flydende og fast radioaktivt materiale fra opar bejdningsanlægget til en af de tanke, hvorfra det fly dende affald bliver pumpet ud i havet.
The stroy which unfolded may, I think, be reasonably summarized as follows. Due to an error of record-keeping, a quantity of radioactive liquid and solids was let out of the reprocessing plant into one of the tanks from which effluent is pumped into the sea.
Da fejlen var konstateret, pumpede selskabet noget af stoffet tilba ge i oparbejdningsanlægget igen: Men noget af det blev pumpet ud i havet.
Once the error was discovered, the company pumped some of this material back into the reprocessing plant. Some it pumped into the sea.