natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tværtimod er jeg helt overbevist om, at det kun vil være ved hjælp af ny teknologi, de rigdomme den må forventes at skaffe os, og de velgørende virkninger den kan have på andre sektorer, at vi både kan skabe arbejdspladser, finansiere arbejdsløsheden, be skytte naturen og opretholde eller endog udbygge vor sociale sikring.
Community action in this sphere must be comprehensive, combining, on the one hand, support for research and development, for targeted projects and, on the other hand, improvement of the financial, economic and human environment to make it more conducive to innovation, development and the spread of these technologies.
Estgen (PPE). - (FR) Fru formand, hr. rådsformand, kære kolleger, den franske filosof Descartes har opbygget et helt system, hele sin politik, på erkendelsesbegrebet. De kendsgerninger, vi står overfor, er imidlertid evidente.
Mr Estgen (PPE). — (FR) Madam President, Mr President of the Council, ladies and gentlemen, the great French philosopher Descartes founded a complete system and his entire policy on the notion of the obvious.
Alle er vi på det rene med, at vi med hensyn til nye teknologier er langt bagud i for hold til amerikanerne og japanerne og snart også an dre asiatiske lande.
We all know that, when it comes to new technologies, we are far behind the Americans and Japanese and will soon be overtaken by other Asian countries.
Endvidere ved vi alle, at vor økonomiske overlevelse er nøje knyttet til vore evner til innovation på området for ny teknologi.
We are also all aware, only too keenly, that our economic survival is indissolubly bound up with our innovative genius in the field of new technologies.
Alt dette har vi vidst længe, og vi proklamerer det i tide og utide.
We have known these things for quite some time now and have been saying so at every opportunity.
Der er ikke brug for videnskabelige konferencer eller omfattende debatter for at finde ud af det.
We do not need symposiums or great debates to realize the obvious.
Medens vi snakker, gør de andre dag for dag noget ved sagen.
While we have been talking, the others have been getting on with the job.
Men da man nu pludselig vågner op i politiske kredse, kan det svøbeslag, vi nu giver os selv, måske virke frelsende.
Nevertheless, since this awareness has now reached such an acute pitch in the political world, this sharp reminder that we are giving ourselves today may have a salutary effect.
I stedet for at klamre os til industrielle strukturer, som de nye teknologier i alle tilfælde vil gøre forældede, så lad os beslutsomt investere i de nye teknolo gier og derigennem forberede de små og mellemstore virksomheders sande æra, for det er her, vi virkelig kan drage fordel af den højt udviklede teknik.
But we would be failing in our duty as parliamentarians if we did not proclaim loud and clear in this Chamber that EUREKA must be a Community venture, that the European Parliament and the Commission must be genuinely involved, not just formally associated. One cannot affirm the will to create the European Union and at the same time leave wealthcreating Europe, the Europe of the future to develop outside the ambit of the Community.
Lad os udnytte den nye teknologi til at gøre verden mere menneskelig.
There are two things that we have to do: we must make a success of Eureka in technological terms, and we must make a success of Eureka in terms of the progress of the Community.
Det budskab, han i går bragte os om den undervisning smæssige indsats, som de nye teknologier indebærer, var overordentlig betydningsfuldt.
The Commission will have to devise new arragements for bringing in third countries and new and more efficient methods for cooperation with companies, which will be the important partners in the case of Eureka.
Undertiden er Europa længe om at vågne op, men når det endelig sker, er det en total opvågnen.
There are times when Europe is slow to awaken but then has all its wits about it.
Lad os begynde med at afskaffe det uansvarlige spild af ar bejde og af åndelige og finansielle ressourcer.
Let us therefore begin by eliminating the irresponsible squandering of our efforts and financial and intellectual resources.
Vi kan lave nok så sensationelle udstillinger, indkalde til de mest imponerende konferencer og holde taler dagen lang, men det nytter ikke at spekulere; der skal handles og handles hurtigt.
We can organize the most spectacular exhibitions, hold the most impressive symposiums, make speeches all day long, but the time is now past for thinking about the problem, we must act and act quickly.
Sagt lige ud er der brug for politisk vilje til loyalt og ærligt samarbejde, og vi skal have de nødvendige penge.
In plain language, we must have the political will to cooperate loyally and honestly, and we must have the necessary money.
Forsknings- og investeringsbevillingerrie skal have en langt større plads på Fællesskabernes budget.
A much greater proportion of the Community budget must be devoted to appropriations for research and investment.
Intet, absolut intet vil i fremtiden kunne erstatte en god menneskelig og moralsk uddannelse, der især på erhvervsuddannelsesområdet går ind for tilpas ningsevne og smidighed fremfor snæver specialuddannelse. dannelse.
Victor Boden, nomen sic hornen — and I hope that he and his colleagues with responsibilities in other areas will be victorious in the key battle to secure the right decisions.
Bonaccini (COM). — (IT) Fru formand, hr. Poniatowski har gjort vel i at indlede denne forhandling med at opfordre os til ikke at afholde en indforstået debat, idet han dermed ytrede ønske om en forhandling, der ikke kun skulle være mellem eksperter, men som skulle berøre de politiske emner, spørgsmålet rejser.
of values. In future there will be no substitute, no con ceivable substitute, for a good human and moral education in which the emphasis, in vocational training especially, is laid on adaptability and flexibility rather than a narrowly-based apprenticeship.
Det er vor opgave at forberede Europa bedre til mor gendagen.
Making better preparations for the Europe of tomorrow — that is the task before us.
For at være på bølgelængde med de moder ne teknologiske krav er det ikke nok at opstille datamater på skolerne; vi skal snarere se at få orden i vore tanker og vore undervisningsprogrammer, så vi kan bekæmpe den moralske slaphed. Selvfølgelig skal vi også koordinere, systematisere og optimere vor forsknings- og industrialiseringsindsats.
No, putting computers in the schools is not enough in order to be in tune with the technological demands of the modern era.
Vi skal fær diggøre det store interne marked, føre en fælles politik udadtil og styrke vor beslutningsproces og herunder Parlamentets beføjelser.
We must create a large internal mar ket, develop and pursue a common external policy and strengthen the framework of our decision-making, including the powers of this Parliament.
Kun på disse betingelser og gennem sammenhæng i den strategiske konvergens kan vi føre Europa frem til en for den kommende generation lovende fremtid.
Only if we pursue action along these lines, with this coherence and convergence of strategies, will we take Europe into a future which really holds out worthwhile prospects for the next generation.
(Bifald fra midten)
(Applause from the Right)
Jeg vil gerne høfligt gøre hr. Sälzer, som jeg værdsætter for hans kultur, opmærksom på, at når Karl Marx behandler spørgsmålet om det ene menneskes udbytning af det andet, behandler han i virkeligheden ikke forholdet mellem ny eller gammel teknologi, men analyserer det juridiske forhold mellem dem, der be sidder produktionsmidlerne, og de andre, der ingen produktionsmidler har, hvilket har visse konsekvenser.
I should also like to say a few words about the effects of new technologies on our society, which we are going to experience come what may, whether we put ourselves at the forefront of progress or we have pro gress imposed on us. The problem facing us is not only a matter of rejoining the vanguard developing advanced technologies but also of making these technologies work for us, which is not a technical problem but a moral problem, and that is where the shoe pinches.
Derfor kan man ikke hævde, at der er en konflikt mellem teknologi og humaniseringsbehov; ganske vist eksisterer der konflikter, men det er mellem an vendelsen af teknologi — lige meget om den er ny eller gammel, forholdet er det samme — og behovet for, at hele samfundet involveres på en demokratisk måde.
We must resolutely say yes to new technologies. Clearly, the technological future will not automatically enhance well-being in the world but — of this I am firmly con vinced — it is also incapable of leading to total alienation of the individual, as long as we fall back on the ethical values handed down to us by our Graeco-Roman tradition and our Judao-Christian civilization.
Det er det centrale punkt, og det mener jeg også har været indholdet af de bemærkninger, der er blevet fremsat her, netop fordi man vil, at dette pris værdige initiativ og det politiske krav, det giver ud tryk for, sejrer i vores samfund og ikke kan anvendes til benspænd, som historien altid kan fremkalde.
On the contrary, I am firmly con vinced that it is only by means of new technologies, the wealth that they are capable of generating for us and the beneficial effects that they can have on other sectors that we shall be able simultaneously to create jobs, meet the costs of unemployment, protect the environment and maintain or indeed develop our social security systems.
Daly (ED). — (EN) Fru formand, hr. Poniatowski siger i sin betænkning, at Europa er stærkest, når vore lande samarbejder, som de har gjort det i Esprit-programmet.
Mrs Daly (ED). — Madam President, in his report Mr Poniatowski says that Europe is at its strongest when our countries cooperate as they have in the Esprit programme.
Jeg har nær forbindelse med Westlands i Somerset, der deltager i et Esprit-program, og efter at jeg har set dette arbejde, tror jeg, at vi i Europa må forsøge at få så meget ud af Esprit som muligt.
I maintain close contacts with Westlands in Somerset who are involved in an Esprit programme and, having seen this work, I believe we in Europe must seek to gain the maximun benefit from Esprit.
Vi har brug for en plan, der kan oplyse mulige brugere om frugterne af Esprit-forskningen.
We need a plan to inform potential users of the fruits of Esprit research.
Jeg ser gerne positive markedsføringsaktiviteter for at sikre, at denne forskning kommer ud af laboratoriet og ud til brugerne.
I want to see positive promotional activity to ensure that this research gets out of the laboratory into the hands of the users.
På denne måde kunne Esprit blive et udstillingsvindue for Eurotec og tjene til at hæve industriens ambitionsniveau.
In this way Esprit would become a showcase for Eurotech and would serve to raise the sights of the manufacturing industry.
Vi trænger alle sammen til at fatte spændvidden i Esprit.
All of us need to understand the scope of Esprit.
Vi tror, at der i løbet af de næste få år vil ske foran dringer som følge af teknologien, der svarer til de for andringer, vi har oplevet i den periode, vi kalder den industrielle revolution.
We believe that the next few years will see changes resulting from technology equivalent to those experienced in the period we call the industrial revolution.
Men resultatet af den nye tek nologi vil kun gavne Fællesskabet økonomisk og på virke vor livskvalitet, hvis vi forstår dens omfang og format og derfor forbereder os på den.
But the impact of new technology will only benefit our Community economically and in the quality of our lives if we understand its scope and scale and hence prepare for it.
Kun ved at have kendskab til den kan vi forberede os, og kun ved at være forberedt kan vi få gavn af den.
Only by being informed can we prepare, and only by being prepared can we benefit.
Så jeg tror, at Esprit og senere programmer har et oplysningsmæssigt ansvar.
So I believe that Esprit and subsequent programmes have an educational responsibility.
De bør forsøge at oplyse os om, hvorledes vort liv og arbejde kan ændre sig ved, at vi tager imod informationsteknologien.
They should seek to inform us of the way life and work could change by our adoption of information technology.
Jeg vil gerne høre Kommissionens opfattelse af dette spørgsmål om yderligere spredning af oplysning, og hvis det er nødvendigt at øge det mandskabsmæssige beredskab for at tage sig af det, så vil jeg støtte enhver anmodning fra Kommissionen herom.
In conclusion, Madam President, I should like to underscore what was said to us yesterday by the President of the Commission, and I must add that it is always an event for me, a rare intellectual pleasure, to enjoy a speech given by Jacques Delors.
Og det vil ikke være rigtigt at blive for frustreret over forsinkelserne.
Jacques Delors reminded us, very appositely, that if our educational systems are going through a crisis, it is not so much because of technologies but in fact a crisis
På dette område er der intet, der løser sig af sig selv.
Where this question is concerned, nothing goes right of its own accord.
Når jeg siger, at forhandlingen i passager er uærlig, er det, fordi der i mine øjne ikke er en tilstrækkelig parallellitet mellem det, vi her postulerer er en udfordring, og det, vi er rede til rent faktisk at udrette for at beskytte de arbejdstagere, der skal arbejde med disse nye teknologier.
Mr Bonaccini (COM). —;(IT) Mr President, Mr Poniatowski did well to start this debate by asking us not to make it an 'intimist' debate — hoping, that is, that it would not be solely a debate between experts, but one which would embrace the political question that the subject raises.
Kvinderne på arbejdsmarkedet har trukket det korteste strå.
He is right, and I think that so far the debate has gone along these lines.
Af samme grund vil jeg tillade mig at understrege, at de nye teknologier vil resultere i forskelle som altid, når der er tale om store ændringer.
That is why I emphasize that this new technology will disturb the balance of things, as is always the case where great leaps are concerned.
Der vil, hvad magtforholdene og det regionale aspekt angår, opstå forskelle, som vi må forhindre.
The balance of power will be disturbed, and territorial balance, which must be protected.
Hr. Poniatowski be handler i sin betænkning indgående spørgsmålet om de multinationale selskabers nye magt, som vi måske ikke har været tilstrækkelig opmærksomme på.
Mr Poniatowski deals at length in his report with the question of the new power of the multinationals, to which we have so far perhaps not shown too much attention.
Der næst vil der være forskelle på det regionale område, som allerede er blevet omtalt af forskellige kolleger.
There will also be territorial imbalances, already mentioned by various members.
Fru Lienemann har med rette understreget betydningen af Eureka, som er datidsformen af et græsk inkoativt verbum, det vil sige et verbum, der tilskynder til handling.
And Mrs Lienemann was right to emphasize the importance of Eureka, which is the past tense of a Greek inchoative verb, that is to say, a verb that incites one to action.
Hvis jeg i stedet skal holde mig til ministerens ord, synes det mig, at det hele indtil nu har været præget af passivitet, og der er fare for, at beslutningen flyttes fra den ene europæiske by til den anden, uden at man nogen sinde afslutter det, der i stedet burde afsluttes. Derfor er Parlamentets røst udtryk for en vilje til virkelig at ville definere og kontrollere denne proces.
Instead, if I am to go by what the Min-ister-in-Office has said, it seems to me that we are still doing nothing, and that there is the danger that the decision will pass from one city of Europe to another without our coming to a conclusion, which we must do.
Piger får færre uddannelsespladser end drenge. Hvad sker der med de piger,* der har kvalificeret sig til såkaldte mandsfag, når de er færdige med deres uddannelse?
In no way, therefore, can we talk about a conflict between tech nology and the demands of humanization; but there are conflicts between the use of technology — whether new or old, it matters not — and all of our society's need for democratic participation.
Som hr. Ippolito allerede har sagt, støtter vi Poniatowski- og Ciancaglini-betænkningerne, som for øvrigt i udvalget fik stort flertal.
As Mr Ippolito has already said, we support the reports of Messrs. Poniatowski and Ciancaglini, which moreover had a ver}' large majority in committee.
Det centrale punkt for os er punkt 25 i Poniatowski-beslutningen, en beslutning det har været møjsommeligt at nå frem til, men som er afgørende for den strategi, jeg netop har redegjort for.
An essential point for us is para 25 of the Poniatowski resolution, which, uncomfortable though it may be, is a decisive one for the strategy that I have just outlined.
(Bifald fra gruppen af kommunister og beslægtede)
(Applause from the extreme Left)
Salisch (S). — (DE) Jeg ved ikke, kære kolleger, hvorledes De har det, men i nogle passager forekom mer forhandlingen om nye teknologier i Europa mig særdeles uærlig.
Mrs Salisch (S). — (DE) Madam President, honourable Members, I don't know if you will agree, but I cannot help thinking that this debate on new technologies in Europe has sometimes been extremely dishonest.
Således havde jeg det allerede i går under symposiet.
I had this feeling yesterday during the symposium.
Det slog mig, i hvor høj grad denne forhandling i lange passager var præget af maskuline tankebaner og magtstrukturer.
It struck me that for long periods the debate was inbued with very masculine forms of thinking and attitudes of male domination.
Vil det ganske enkelt bare være en ledsagende om stændighed ved de nye teknologier, at kvinderne her kan hævde sig bedre? Det tror jeg ikke på!
From this standpoint, therefore, general approval is forthcoming from the Committee on Energy on the points in question — though I think it is forthcoming also, generally speaking, from our Parliament — general approval, that is, not the approval of this or that group.
Vi ville først være ærlige over for hinanden, hvis vi virkelig kunne blive enige om et samtidigt forløb af den tek nologiske innovation og den sociale beskyttelse. Her går skillelinjen i Europa-Parlamentet!
Nothing is barred where the new technology is concerned; if anything, as Mr Linkhor said, there is regret for certain delays that have been apparent in industry — and not only in industry — in the implementation of a policy of continuous innovation.
Jeg gentager, hvad jeg allerede sagde i går.
I can only repeat what I said yesterday.
Her er tale om fjendebilleder; her er tale om, at vi skal frem mod nye horisonter, højere op, og at vi skal besejre andre.
There was talk all the time of 'the enemy', of how we must move on to new horizons, going ever higher and further and defeating others.
Men det er, kære kolleger, det stof, katastrofer er gjort af.
But that kind of talk, dear colleagues, is a recipe for catastrophe.
Maskulin teknik i denne betydning — jeg har allerede sagt det én gang, jeg gentager det — har i historien ført til katastrofer.
Male-oriented technology in this sense — I have said this already and I want to repeat it now — is what history shows us has led to catastrophe.
Hiroshima er et symbol på en sådan katastrofe. Når vi taler om nye teknolo gier, burde vi spørge os selv : Cui bono, hvem nytter det?
Hiroshima is the symbol of that kind of catastrophe.
Når det drejer sig om de impliceredes konkrete rettigheder, er det pludselig forbi med fællesskabet i spørgsmål om den teknologiske innovation.
I think, therefore, that the Commission and the Coun cil of Ministers can count on wide support for this proposal.
Men det er også Gretchen-spørgsmålet. Politikken kan i mod sætning til videnskaben ikke sige, hvad der skal ske, men den skal finde instrumenter til at styre og regulere processer med. Det er et demokratis fornemste opgave.
And it would be out of place for us to get too frustrated over the delay — what counts is having the determination to act, bearing in mind that tackling these problems only with the spirit of competition — which was referred to by certain colleagues on a number of occasions during the symposium yesterday, and is moreover a spirit with which we are in agreement — means closing one's eyes to a whole series of other questions that face us.
Det er ganske vist besværligt, men kan vi ikke enes om det, får vi ikke noget teknologisk gen nembrud.
We are aware — as President Delors pointed out yesterday — of all the difference there is between the other industrial revolutions and this one.
Så løber vi risikoen for at få et splittet sam-
That is why we cannot rely simply on laissezfaire, in the belief that things will go right of their own
Jeg vover den påstand, at denne form for teknikforståelse, denne måde at anvende teknik på, ikke kan være i kvindernes interesse.
I would go so far as to say that this form of under standing of technology and these ways of applying technology will never bring any benefits to women.
Kvinderne har i historien egentlig altid været værktøj, ofre for en sådan teknik forståelse, og bagefter kunne de så få lov til at samle
Women have, historically, always been tools, the victims of that technological form of understanding, and at the end of the day they are the ones who have had to pick up the pieces. If we want to prevent that from
Salisch fund, som så at sige uden konkurrence blokerer sig selv.
Salisch risk of turning into a divided society that will obstruct its own development regardless of the competition.
Derfor siger jeg så klart, at maskuline tankebaner har præget denne forhandling.
That is why I have tried to draw attention to the fact that male thought-patterns so deeply imbue this debate.
Hvis vi ville tale helt ærligt til hinanden, måtte vi sige, at den teknologiske innovation, hvis den forløber således, som det er blevet sagt her, for en stor del vil ske på arbejdstagernes bekostning og navnlig på kvindernes bekostning!
If we were to talk really honestly to each other we would have to admit that technological innovation will, if it is implemented in the way that has been indicated here, be achieved largely on the backs of the workers, and especially on the backs of women workers.
Derfor gør jeg mig til talsmand for, at vi enes om et instrument, hvormed vi kan kontrollere den teknolo giske udvikling.
There is no real parallel between this mood of anticipation and existing social reality in Europe.
Lad mig slutte med et bibelcitat, ligeledes fra Lukasevangeliet.
That is why I am appealing for us to reach agreement on mechanisms with which we can control technological development.
Som hr. Linkohr allerede har sagt nu i formiddag, egner Lukas sig til en sådan forhandling om teknologi : » Thi hvis nogen af jer vil bygge et tårn, sætter han sig så ikke først hen og regner ud, hvad det vil koste — om han har nok til at få det færdigt?« Mine damer og herrer, her er intet at til føje.
We are not prepared to say plainly whether or not we intend to fashion the relationship between people and machines in such a way that human beings really do get something out of it, that the technology really does help to enhance our humanity.
Hr. formand, jeg tillader mig at tvivle på det.
As my colleague Mr Linkohr pointed out this morning, Luke is very instructive for a debate on technology:
Jeg mener f.eks., at veto-praksisen, en mellemstatslig dårlig praksis, har leveret bevis på sin uhensigtsmæssighed, for der er nemlig ingen beslutningsdygtighed.
For how does the situation of women actually appear on the labour market today where the great wave of technological innovation can be seen to be in the ascendant?
Samarbejdet skal derfor ske på fællesskabsplan og ikke på mellemstatsligt plan.
Women in the labour market have the worst deal.
Det skal ske på en anden, en ny politisk instans' plan, på Det europæiske Fællesskabs, Den europæiske Unions plan.
More of them are unemployed, they are worse paid, and when it comes to occupational train ing, women and girls are always bringing up the rear.
FORSÆDE: MARIO DIDO'
IN THE CHAIR: MR DIDÒ