natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Skal vi fortsat støtte en politik, der resulterer i sådanne øko nomiske og sociale afsavn?
I also want to raise the issue of how the Commission and the Council intend to put this agreement in principle into effect and to demand respect for the rights of this Assembly in regard to decision-making.
Lad der ikke herske nogen tvivl om, at det er præcis, hvad denne betænkning vil resultere i.
It is unthinkable that the Council should determine agree ments in principle which imply definitive decisions and that Parliament should only be consulted on the imple
2-1103/84) af Herman for udvalget om økonomi, valutaspørgsmål og industripolitik over forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet til afgørelse om samordning af medlemsstaternes og fællesskabsinstitutionernes aktiviteter med henblik på at indføre et tværinstitutionelt informationssystem for Fællesskabet (INSIS) (KOM(84) 380 endel. - dok.
Mrs Squarcialupi (COM), rapporteur. — (IT) Madam President, I shall try to be succinct, if only because, after a day of political high feeling, this report from the Committee on the Environement, Public Health and Consumer Protection may seem a small thing. But it is not: it concerns the food we eat every day, and hence our health, since it deals with extraction solvents for foodstuffs and food ingredients, which may be of a different origin.
2-588/84): vedtaget.
No 2-320/308
Hele generationer af mennesker kastes ud i håbløshed, hvilket ikke kan og ikke må få lov at fortsætte .
To do that, we must wait for the implementation of the treaty on European Union.
Der er uhyre lidt håb for disse millioner, navnlig de unge, i denne betænkning.
President. — Mrs Wieczorek-Zeul, you yourself have tabled some of the amendments.
Vi må ikke tilsidesætte vort klare ansvar.
Have you done so as rapporteur or as a Member of Parliament?
Kommissionen bør udarbejde en beretning, der tager fat på arbejdsløshedens onde.
In the latter case you would, of course, be personally in favour of them, but not necessarily as rapporteur.
Vi bør hilse en politik baseret på interventioner og offentligt initiativ velkommen som det eneste middel til at rette op på det private initiativs forfærdende mange fejltagelser.
I tabled them as rapporteur and I am therefore in favour of all the amendments on behalf of my committee, although I would like to point out that Amendment No 7 has been withdrawn.
I den forbindelse er det relevant at sammenligne den frie markeds- og tøjlesløse konkurrencefilosofi, der findes i denne betænkning, med den ultraprotektionisme og interventionspolitik, der skal gælde for landbruget for enhver pris. Hvilket hykleri! ri!
One such defect is that it extends beyond the scope of the Treaties that you wish to respect, and beyond the constitutional procedures of the Member States, since the Treaties were ratified on the basis of those procedures.
2-1135/84) af Rogalla for udvalget om økonomi, valutaspørgsmål og industripolitik over forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet til sekstende di rektiv om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgifter — det fælles merværdiafgiftssystem: en fælles ordning for visse goder, der definitivt er belastet med merværdiafgift, og som en endelig forbruger i en medlemsstat indfører fra en anden medlemsstat (KOM(84) 318 endel. — dok. 2452/84)
Mrs Veil (L). — (FR) I think, Mr President, that, as the other amendments show, this is not a linguistic amendment and that the first amendment should per haps be held over in order to see what becomes of this amendment, which, as far as the substance is con cerned, is an amendment relating to deletion. The title could then be adapted afterwards.
Efter forkastelse af Kommissionens forslag
That is why I shall vote in favour.
Formanden. — Ifølge artikel 35 i forretningsordenen skal jeg spørge Kommissionen, om den er parat til at tage sit forslag tilbage.
Mrs Hammerich (ARC), in writing. — (DA) This report from the Political Affairs Committee seeks to give Parliament some influence over the Commission's programme.
Tugendhat, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil konsultere mine kolleger, og vi vil utvivlsomt tale med vore efterfølgere.
As is well-known, in the Stuttgart declaration Denmark, in fact, dissociated itself from giving Parliament authority over the new Commission's appointment.
Vi vil derefter meddele Parlamentet vor opfattelse.
All Danish Members should there fore vote against the Formigoni report.
Formanden. — Kommissionen tager altså ikke sit for slag tilbage.
Mr Rogalla (S), in writing. — (DE) Attempts are frequently made in the House to gain more influence and powers within the Community structure.
I artikel 35, stk. 3, i vor forretningsorden hedder det:
These endeavours are legitimate and must be pursued.
Hvis Kommissionen ikke tager sit forslag tilbage, kan Parlamentet vedtage ikke at stemme om beslutningsforslaget og at henvise spørgsmålet til fornyet behandling i det kompetente udvalg.
The solemn undertaking by the Commission pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 10(2) of the Mer ger Treaty — which can also be called the swearing-in — should be a matter for this European Parliament.
Som ordfører for en betænkning om dette spørgsmål og en beslutning, som blev vedtaget af Parlamentet i maj 1984, må jeg gøre opmærksom på, ät Kommissionen har forladt den tekst, Parlamentet tilsluttede sig, på adskillige vigtige punkter og på en måde, som klart er i strid med forbrugernes interesser i hele Fællesskabet. lesskabet.
Not only is this resolution in no way at variance with the letter of the Treaty but, better still, it is entirely in line with its spirit. By giving Parliament, in Article 144 of the Treaty of Rome, the right to censure the Commission, the Treaty obviously subjects the work of the Commission to the confidence of Parliament.
Det er meget kedeligt, at den afgående Kommission lader til at have kapituleret for pres fra industrien og dermed har mistet en betydningsfuld lejlighed til at forbedre denne vigtige sektors funktion.
I therefore call on all those responsible in our Parlia ment, and in particular on the President and the Bureau, not to waste this opportunity to strengthen the dignity, self-image and influence of the European
(Forslaget til beslutning vedtoges) Q)
(Parliament adopted the resolution)1
Rogalla (S), ordfører. — (DE) Hr. formand, i overens stemmelse med artikel 35, stk. 3, i forretningsordenen kan vi nu enten vedtage ikke at stemme om beslutningsforslaget, eller vi kan tilbagevise det til udvalget og stemme om det i næste mødeperiode.
Mr McMahon (S). — Mr President, this is a very important legal matter, and I think our Continental colleagues have not understood the intricacies of Bri­tish law. There is no precedent in English law for a life peer to give up his title.
Da nu Kommissionen snart afslutter sin funktionstid og en ny Kommissionen tiltræder sit embede, vil jeg, også af hensyn til forholdene mellem vore institutioner, anbefale forsamlingen at tilbagevise betænkningen til udvalget med pålæg til udvalget om efter en måneds forløb at forelægge forsamlingen en ny indstilling.
In its resolution of 12 February 1981 Parliament approved the appointment of the Commission, but only because it was able to take cognizance of the Commission's programme at the same time and could declare itself in agreement with its policy guidelines.
Jeg vil samtidig bede om, at der bliver taget sådanne skridt, at det nye medlem af Kommissionen, der bli ver ansvarligt for dette spørgsmål, kan deltage i ud valgsmødet herom sidst i januar.
Miss Tongue (S). — I must admit that I am very dis­mayed at the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights and the way the amend­ments have actually been voted in this House.
(Tilbagevisning til udvalget vedtoges) *
(Mixed reactions)
(') Ordføreren udtalte sig: r- FOR ændringsforslag nr. 1, 6 til 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 30 til 32, 35 og 36; — IMOD ændringsforslag nr. 2, 3, 15 og 24.
The rapporteur was: — IN FAVOUR OF Amendments Nos 1, 2, 5 to 8; — AGAINST Amendment No 4.
Efter forkastelse af Kommissionens forslag
Consequently, as we have declared in the debate, we shall be voting against the whole resolution.
Formanden. — Ifølge artikel 35 i forretningsordenen skal jeg spørge Kommissionen, om den er parat til at tage sit forslag tilbage.
Mr Christensen (ARC), in writing. — (DA) My country, Denmark, has always pursued a policy aimed, both nationally and internationally, at securing free and fair competition without public subsidies or the development of monopolies.
Stemmeforklaring
No 2-320/312
Tugendhat, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (EN)' Nej, hr. formand, jeg er ikke i stand til at tage det tilbage.
Mr Penders (PPE), in writing. — (NL) I voted against paragraph 19 regarding the natural gas tariff for Netherlands glasshouse cultivation, for the follow ing reasons.
Denne aftale er en integrerende del af Fontainebleau-aftalen, og det er derfor, vi er kommet med det.
Our country's membership of the European Community was based, as regards economics, on the desire to eliminate national subsidies, particularly in the sphere of agriculture.
Jeg vil konsultere mine kolleger, og vi vil tale med vore fremtidige kolleger, og jeg vil mene, at den procedure, som hr. Rogalla så høfligt foreslog i relation til sin betænkning, måtte være den rette også ved denne lejlighed.
It is therefore depressing to note that the motion for a resolution ignores completely that sector where national and, according to the Treaty of Rome, unlawful subsidies are of such over whelming importance and higher than at any previous time.
Da Folkebevægelsen mod EF er tilhænger af, at Dan mark skal have den skatte- og fordelingspolitiske selvbestemmelsesret, der blev lovet os forud for vort lands indtrædelsen i EF, må vi afvise disse forslag ved at stemme imod.
The opinion of our Danish People's Movement against the European Community is that subsidies should be determined on the basis of international negotiations between sovereign States with equal powers. GATT, the OECD and UNCTAD are suitable fora.
Jeg anmoder om tilbagevisning.
We cannot support this report.
(Tilbagevisning til udvalget vedtoges)
Mrs Daly (ED), in writing. — In supporting the Gautier report on competition policy I am particularly glad that the rapporteur has referred specifically to the reintroduction of a preferential tariff for Dutch horticulturists. culturists.
Vi gør opmærksom på, at en forsinket indbetaling af importmomsen vil koste den danske stat et provenutab på et milliardbeløb. Det der i realiteten det per spektiv, som ligger i forslagene.
For example, although the Court of Justice condemned in the San Giorgio Case (199/82) an Italian law which restricted the right to recover taxes levied contrary to Community law, a similar law exists and continues to be applied in France thus denying to taxpayers in that Member State their Community rights; again where it is now clear that actions for damages and injunctions can be brought in the United Kingdom for breaches of Articles 30, 85 and 86, it is not clear in other Member States.
(Forslaget til beslutning vedtoges)
Mrs Lizin, in writing. — (FR) I shall vote against the Gautier report for a reason of principle.
Formanden. — Jeg gør opmærksom på, at De endnu indtil senest kl. 22 kan indlevere Deres skriftlige stemmeforklaringer.
Then for a special reason: I consider that this report is in fact too feeble as regards the position to be adopted towards the discriminatory practices on the pricing of Dutch natural gas.
(Mødet hævet kl. 20.05) (i)
Debates of the European Parliament
2-1140/84) af Beumer for udvalget om økonomi, valutaspørgsmål og industripolitik over forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet til tyvende direktiv om harmonisering af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om omsætningsafgifter — det fælles merværdiafgiftssystem: undtagelser i forbindelse med den særstøtte der ydes til visse landbrugere som kompensation for afviklingen af de monetære udligningsbeløb for visse
Mr Seligman (ED), in writing. — I shall support the Gautier report, in particular because paragraph 19 calls for firm action by the Commission to reverse the 10% reduction of gas prices for horticulturalists introduced by 'Gas Unie' in Holland on 1 October, in breach of the 1982 agreement.
(') Dagsorden for næste møde: se protokoUen.
One can see that the Dutch have been very clever in their timing.
Svar på mundtlig forespørgsel nr. 0-70/84 med forhandling af de la Malene
Reply to Oral Question No 0-70/84 — with debate — put by Mr de la Malène
Ved fastsættelsen af landbrugspriserne for produktionsåret 1984-85 vedtog Rådet, da det indførte forordning (EØF) nr. 855/84 ('), at overveje en gradvis afvikling af de monetære udligningsbeløb for at genoprette landbrugsmarkedets enhed, der er blevet sat over styr på grund af vedvarende forskelle i medlemsstaternes prisniveauer.
When fixing the agricultural prices for the 1984-1985 marketing year, the Council agreed, by adopting Regulation (EEC) No 855/84,!to plan for a gradual dismantling of the
For at udligne den nedgang i landbrugernes indkomster, som skyldtes landbrugsprisemes fald i national valuta som følge af revalueringen af D-markens repræsentative kurs, der var blevet besluttet for at mulig gøre afviklingen af de monetære udligningsbeløb, blev det ved den nævnte rådsforordning tilladt Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland at yde en særstøtte til sine landbrugere i form af en momslettelse på ikke over 3 % af den pris uden moms, som køberen af landbrugsproduktet skal betale.
In order to compensate for the reduction in farmers' incomes resulting from the reduction in agricultural prices expressed in national currency following the revaluation of the representative rate of the DM decided upon to allow the MCAs to be dismantled, the abovementioned Council Regulation authorized the Federal Republic of Germany to grant a special aid to its farmers in the form of VAT relief which should not exceed 3% of the ex-VAT price paid by the purchaser for the agricultural product.
Rådet, som anerkendte nødvendigheden af at yde denne støtte for at undgå et væsenthgt indkomsttab for det tyske landbrug, besluttede ved samme lejlighed at vedtage et direktiv, der, som en undtagelse fra bestemmelserne i 6. direktiv, skulle give Forbundsrepublikken mulighed for at yde støtte til sine landbrugere, og som indeholder de nærmere gennemførelsesbestemmelser for ydelsen af en sådan støtte.
Acknowledging the need to grant this aid in order to avoid a considerable loss of income for German agriculture, the Council at the same time agreed to adopt a Directive allowing the Federal Republic of Germany, by way of derogation from the 6th Directive, to grant aid to its farmers and stating the technical rules for granting such aid.
Efter at Det europæiske Råd havde givet sin principielle tilslutning tU den foranstaltning, Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland ønskede indført, vedtog Rådet på anmodning af Forbundsrepublikken, som gjorde gældende, at indkomsttabet for landets landbrugere oversteg 3% grænsen, under hensyn til disse særlige omstændigheder, som begrunder en overskridelse af den ved forordning (EØF) nr. 855/84 af 31. marts 1984 indførte 3% grænse, at gøre brug af de beføjelser, der tilkommer det i medfør af traktatens artikel 93.
After the European Council had agreed in principle to the measure planned by the Federal Republic of Germany, and at the request of the Federal Republic of Germany, which had reported income losses above the 3% limit being experienced by its farmers, the Council made use of the powers conferred on it by Article 93 of the Treaty, taking into account these exceptional circumstances which justified exceeding the 3% limit fixed on 31 March 1984 by Regulation (EEC) No 855/84.
TU forskel for den særstøtte, der blev tilladt i henhold tU forordning (EØF) nr. 855/84, deltager Fællesskabet ikke i finansieringen af denne rent nationale støtte.
Unlike the special aid authorized under Regulation (EEC) No 855/84, the Community is not involved in the financing of this purely national aid.
I betragtning af støttens nationale karakter har Rådet for at meddele sin tilladelse dertil lagt de relevante bestemmelser i EØF-traktaten om støtte, som ydes af en stat, til grund, dvs. artikel 93.
In view of its national character, the Council, in authorizing it, took as its basis the provisions of the EEC relating to State aids, viz. Article 93.
Ved vedtagelsen af forordning (EØF) nr. 855/84 blev det klart forudsat, at iværksættelsen af den omhandlede støtteordning ikke må berøre FæUesskabets egne indtægter; betragtningerne i afgørelse 84/361/EØF siger på deres side klart, at de ydede godtgørelser ikke må overstige følgerne af, at de monetære udligningsbeløb afvikles.
When Regulation (EEC) No 855/84 was adopted, it was clearly understood that imple mentation of the aid arrangements which it laid down should not affect the Community's own resources; the recitals of Decision 84/361/EEC state that the compensation granted should not exceed the effects arising out of the dismantling of MCAs.
Det tilkommer Kommissionen at overvåge den korrekte anvendelse af forordning (EØF) nr. 855/84, af beslutning 84/361/EØF, af sjette momsdirektiv samt, når det bUver vedtaget, at tyvende momsdirektiv, hvori de tekniske regler for betaling af støtten til de tyske landbrugere i form af momslettelse vü büve . fastlagt.
[It is for the Commission to ensure correct application of Regulation (EEC) No 855/84, Decision 84/361/EEC, the 6th VAT Directive and — once it is adopted — the 20th VAT Directive which will define the technical rules for paying the aid granted to German farm ers in the form of VAT relief.].
Endvidere har forslaget til tyvende direktiv, som for tiden er til behandling i Rådets instanser samt til høring i Europa-Parlamentet, som i henhold tU traktatens artikel 100 er blevet bedt om at afgive udtalelse, til formål at give Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland tilladelse til som en undtagelse fra bestemmelserne i 6. momsdirektiv at gøre brug af momsen med henblik på at yde den i forordning (EØF) 855/84 og i beslutning 84/361/EØF fortsatte omhandlede særstøtte.
In addition, the aim of the proposal for a 20th Directive, currently being examined by the internal bodies of the Council and the European Parlia ment, which is at present being consulted pursuant to Article 100 of the Treaty, is to authorize the Federal Republic of Germany, by way of derogation from the 6th VAT Directive, to use VAT to grant the special aid provided for the Regulation (EEC) No 855/84 and Decision 84/361/EEC.
MØDET FREDAG DEN 14. DECEMBER 1984
SITTING OF FRIDAY, 14 DECEMBER 1984
— Spørgsmål nr. 6 af Seligman : Tilbage trækning og destruktion af store mængder citrusfrugter
Question No 6, by Mr Seligman: With drawal and destruction of large quanti
Fiskeri — Forslag af Kommissionen (dok. 21240/84 - KOM(84) 711 endel.) til Rådet
Fisheries — Proposals by the Commission to the Council (Doc. 2-1240/84 — COM(84) 711 final):
Wijsenbeek, Lynge, Clinton, Battersby, Bon de, Guermeur, Contogeorgis (Kommissionen) nen)
Mr Wijsenbeek; Mr Lynge; Mr Clinton; Mr Battersby; Mr Bonde; Mr Guermeur; Mr Contogeorgis (Commission)
Toldområde EØF — Forslag af Kommissionen (dok. 2-1242/84 - KOM(84) 723 endel.) til Rådet
Customs territory of the EEC — Proposal from the Commission to the Council (Doc. 2-1242/84 — COM(84) 723 final):
— Spørgsmål nr. 21 af Cinciari Rodano: Kvindens situation i udviklingslandene
Question No 21, by Mrs Cinciari Rodano: The situation of women in developing countries:
Formanden. — Protokollen fra mødet i går er om delt.
(The sitting opened at 9 a.m.)
84 gen, at et mandat er blevet ledigt, og underretter medlemsstaten herom.
Mr Glezos (S). — (GR) Mr President, I cannot find my name in the list of those who took part in yesterday's voting on Document 1185/84 by the Committee on Budgets.
Formanden. — Det tager vi til efterretning, hr. Glezos.
President. — We will make a note of that, Mr Glezos.
I går formiddags rejste jeg spørgsmålet om et skriftligt svar, og formanden var så venlig at tage sig af sagen.
Yesterday morning I raised the issue of a written reply and the occupant of the Chair yesterday morning kindly had the matter attended to.
Overbring ham venligst min tak.
Please convey my thanks to him.
I henhold til den danske lov af 14. december 1977 vedrørende Grønland under særlig henvisning til be stemmelserne vedrørende valg af repræsentanter til Europa-Parlamentet udløber endvidere hr. Lynges mandat den 31. december 1984.
Furthermore, in accordance with the Danish law of 14 December 1977 on Greenland, with particular reference to the provisions concerning the election of representatives to the European Parliament, Mr Lynge's term of office ends on 31 December 1984.
De danske myndigheder har meddelt mig, at hr. John Iversen træder i stedet for hr. Lynge.
The Danish authorities have informed me that Mr Lynge is being replaced by Mr John Iversen.
Jeg vil gerne byde vort nye med lem velkommen og minde Parlamentet om bestem melserne i artikel 6, stk. 3, i forretningsordenen.
I should like to welcome our new Member and remind the House of the provisions of Rule 6(3) of our Rules of Procedure.
Må jeg endvidere, hr. formand, med hensyn til spørgetiden anmode Dem om at se på det problem, der opstår, hvad angår skriftlige svar.
Might I then, Sir, ask you further with regard to Question Time that you consider the problem that arises regarding written replies.
Det forekom mer mig, at det skriftlige svar kommer på den pågældende kommissærs sprog.
It appears to me that the written reply comes in the language of the Commissioner concerned.
Jeg foreslår, at i stedet for at omdele svaret på kommissærens sprog, omdeles det på medlemmets sprog.
I would suggest to you, Sir, that rather than being circulated to the Member in the language of the Commissioner, it should be circulated in the language appropriate to the Member.
Jeg beder Dem om at undersøge denne sag.
I would ask you to have that matter examined.
Formanden. — Jeg sagde faktisk, at hr. Lynges man dat udløber den 31. december.
We take notice of your request, Mr Fitz-
Wijsenbeek (L). — (EN) Ja, men De bød allerede det nye medlem velkommen.
Mr Wijsenbeek (L). — May I remind you of the fact that it is not yet 31 December and that Mr Lynge is still among us.
von der Vring (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, ville De være så venlig at overbringe hr. Lynge Parlamentets afskedsønsker her og give ham lejlighed til at komme med en afskedserklæring?
President. — I did say that Mr Lynge's term of office ends on 31 December.
Tomlinson (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, i Parlamentets afstemning om at forkaste budgettet i går, blev det tydeligt meddelt, at 319 stemte for, 5 imod, og 16 hverken stemte for eller imod.
Mr Tomlinson (S). — Mr President, in the vote of the Parliament to reject the budget yesterday, the vote was clearly declared as 319 in favour, 5 against and 16 abstentions.
I oversigten over af stemningsresultatet står der, at kun 3 medlemmer stemte imod, og jeg vil gerne have en forklaring på forskellen mellem de 5, der blev meddelt, og de 3, der er ført til protokols.
In the record of the vote only 3 people are recorded as voting against, and I should like an explanation as to the discrepancy between the 5 that were declared and the 3 that have been recorded.
Formanden. — Hr. Tomlinson, årsagen til forskellen er tilsyneladende den, at nogle medlemmer umiddelbart efter afstemning kom herop og forklarede, at de havde stemt anderledes, end de agtede, og derfor blev afstemningsresultatet ændret.
President. — Mr Tomlinson, I understand that the reason for the discrepancy is that immediately after the vote a number of people came to the front and explained that they had voted in a way they had not intended to, so the vote was changed.
Det er, hvad der skete.
That is what happened.
Tomlinson (S). — (EN) Er det ensbetydende med, hr. formand, at Parlamentet er blevet vildledt af visse konservative medlemmers stemmeforklaringer efter forhandlingen?
President. — Mr von der Vring, the intention of the Presidency was to do that after we had completed the votes which must be taken this morning.1