natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissær Giolitti kom med nogle meget præcise bemærkninger som svar på forhandlingen, og det var umuligt at høre, hvad han sagde, selv med hovedtelefonerne på.
Commissioner Giolitti was making some very precise statements in response to the debate ; and it was impossible to hear what he was saying even with headphones on.
Det var en skændsel.
That was a disgrace.
Jeg må desværre sige, at det ikke kun er, når der tales fransk, at medlemmerne ikke hører efter.
I regret to say that it is not only when you speak in French that Members do not hear.
Der er nok engelsktalende medlemmer, og de hører aldrig efter, endog ikke på engelsk.
There are enough English-speaking Members and they never hear any comments even in English.
Elaine Kellett-Bowman (ED). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne, at De undskylder over for kommissær Giolitti, der har været så venlig at sidde her under hele forhandlingen, og hvis afsluttende bemærkninger var ret uforståelige for alle.
Mrs Kellett-Bowman (ED). — Madam President, I would like you to apologize to Commissioner Giolitti, who has done us the courtesy to sit here throughout this debate and whose closing remarks were quite incompehensible to anybody.
Kan medlemmerne ikke vise den høflighed stille og roligt at indtage deres pladser i stedet for at konversere i midtergangene?
Can Members not do him the courtesy of going quietly to their seats instead of holding conversations in the aisles ?
Han gjorde sit bedste for at besvare alt, men han skulle overdøve en masse småsnakken.
He did his best to answer every point, but he was speaking against a flood of conversations.
Han har krav på høflighed, og han har krav på en undskyldning fra forsamlingen.
He is entitled to courtesy and he is entitled to an apology from this Assembly.
Formanden. — Jeg tror, kommissær Giolitti hørte af Parlamentets reaktion på fru Kellett-Bowmans indlæg til forretningsordenen, at hun støttes fuldt i sit indlæg.
President. — I think Commissioner Giolitti will have heard from the reaction of the House to Mrs Kellett-Bowman's point of order that she is fully supported in thanking him for his statement.
Vi beklager, at hans indlæg ikke blev hørt fuldt ud på grund af støjen fra medlemmerne.
We regret that his statement was not fully heard owing to the noise made by Members.
Dalsass (PPE). — (DE) Fru formand, ganske kort til forretningsordenen: hr. Nikolaou har anmodet om, at hans indlæg medtages i referatet, og det blev imødekommet af formanden.
Mr Dalsass (PPE). — (DE) Madam President, just a brief comment with regard to the Rules of Procedure.
Nu ved jeg, at man kan afgive skriftlige stemmeforklaringer og få dem medtaget.
The Chair has acceded to Mr Nikolaou's request to have his speech recorded in the report of proceedings.
Men kan også andre indlæg, man ikke er frem kommet med, medtages i referatet?
I am already aware that written explanations of vote can be printed in this way, but are we now to assume that the same treatment may be given to other speeches which were not delivered from the floor of the House ?
Jeg vil gerne anmode Dem om at fortælle mig i henhold til hvilken bestemmelse i forretningsordenen.
If so, I would ask you to quote the relevant Article from our Rules of Procedure.
Konstantinos Nikolaou (S). — (GR) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne protestere i anledning af en sag, som er opstået.
Mr Nikolaou (S). — (GR) Mr President, I wish to make a protest.
Den gruppe, jeg tilhører, havde indtegnet mig som taler om de- fire betænkninger, som blev drøftet under et.
The political group to which I belong put me down as a speaker on all four of the reports we have debated.
Men jeg sad i præsidiet og i det udvidede præsidium, og jeg så ikke mit navn på taler listen.
However, I was involved with the Bureau and the enlarged Bureau, and did not see my name on the list of speakers.
Derfor beder jeg om, at teksten til min tale må blive taget med i referatet.
In view of this, I ask that the text of my speech should be included in the verbatim report.
Formanden. — Hr. Dalsass, jeg forstod på hr. Nikolaou, at han anmodede om at få det indlæg, han kom med, ført til protokols.
President. — Mr Dalsass, I understood from Mr Nikolaou that he was asking for the comment he made to be recorded.
Et indlæg, man ikke er kommet med her i mødesalen, kan selvfølgelig ikke blive medtaget i referatet, undtagen en stemmeforklaring.
No speech which is not made on the floor of this House can of course be recorded, except an explanation of vote.
Jeg forstod det sådan, at hr. Nikolaou anmodede om, at hans bemærkning om, at han ikke kunne fremkomme med sit indlæg, skulle medtages i møde protokollen.
I understood that Mr Nikolaou was requesting that the comment that he was not able to make his speech should be recorded in the report of proceedings.
Sådan forstod jeg hans bemærkning.
This is as I understood his comment.
Formanden. — Hr. Nikolaou, Deres bemærkninger vil blive medtaget som ønsket.
President. — Mr Nikolaou, your comments will be recorded as requested.
Aktuel og uopsættelig debat (indsigelser)
Topical and urgent debate : Objections
Formanden. — I overensstemmelse med artikel 82, stk. 2, andet afsnit, i forretningsordenen har jeg modtaget følgende begrundet skriftligt begrundede indsigelser mod listen over sager med anmodning om uopsættelig forhandling i morgen.
President. — In accordance with Rule 48 (2), second subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure, I have received the following objections, justified in writing, to the list of subjects proposed for topical and urgent debate tomorrow morning.
(Formanden oplæste indsigelserne) (')
Mr Bombard (S). — (FR) Madam President, like Mrs Kellett-Bowman a moment ago, I wish to say that I am ashamed that a Member of the Commission should have been treated in this way.
Bombard (S). — (FR) Fru formand, jeg må sige, at jeg lige som fru Kellett-Bowman for lidt siden er oprørt over, at man behandler kommissæren sådan.
(The President read out the objections)
Jeg skal minde om, at afstemningen om disse indsigelser finder sted uden forhandling.
I would remind the House that the vote on these objections will be taken without debate. '
Jeg håber, at de bemærkninger, der er fremsat, vil blive taget til efter retning af de medlemmer, der har lavet en hel del støj og forhindret taleren i at blive hørt.
I hope that the comments that have been made will be heeded by Members who have been making a great deal of noise and stopping the speaker from being heard.
Kommissæren har allerede hørt Parlamentets undskyldning og har utvivlsomt, taget den ad notam.
The Commissioner has already heard the apologies of the House and, I am sure, has taken them on board.
Castle (S). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne komme med et ændringsforslag til listen.
Mrs Castle (S). — Madam President, I wish to move an amendment to the list.
Jeg vil gerne foreslå, at vi erstatter forslaget om Libanon med forslaget fra mig og en række af mine kolleger om truslen mod topmødet i Athen, som ikke har figureret noget sted på listen over sager med anmodning om uopsættelig forhandling.
I wish to move that we replace the motion on the Lebanon by the motion in my own name and that of a number of my colleagues, on the threat to the Athens Summit, which has nowhere appeared on the list of recommendations for urgent debate.
Jeg gør det af to grunde: for det første er der altid alt for mange udenrigsspørgsmål på listen.
I do it on two grounds : first, there are always far too many foreign issues on our urgency lists.
Jeg er enig i, at Grenada-spørgsmålet er en hastesag.
I agree that the Grenada issue is urgent.
Jeg er enig i, at det tyrkiske spørgsmål er en hastesag, og at Cypern-spørgsmålet er en hastesag.
I agree that the Turkish issue is urgent ; and that the Cyprus issue is urgent. But to
Patterson (ED). — (EN) Fru formand, i fortsættelse af dette indlæg til forretningsordenen vil jeg gerne påpege, at den tidligere formand kaldte til orden.
Mr Patterson (ED). — Madam President, further to that point of order, may I point out that your predecessor in the Chair did call for order.
Han kaldte meget klart til orden på fransk, og ingen tog den mindste notits af det, da man ikke kan forstå, hvad formanden siger, medmindre man har hovedtelefoner på.
He called for order very clearly in French, and no one took the slightest bit of notice, the reason being that unless you headphones headphones on you cannot understand what the Chair is saying.
Det er et spørsmål om at have en
Could I ask the Bureau to
Castle misforståelser. I punkt Β i beslutningen tales der i den tyske tekst om Beschwichtigungspolitik, på fransk om une politique d'apaisement og på engelsk om appease­ment, mens det på italiensk er oversat med »paci­fisme«, hvilket er det stik modsatte.
Castle serious misunderstandings.
Jeg anmoder følgelig om, at denne oversættelse rettes, så den bliver forståelig.
I therefore ask that this translation be corrected so as to make proper sense.
Vi vil derfor bruge den tyske og den engelske tekst ved afstemningen.
We will therefore vote on the English and German texts.
Mommersteeg (PPE). — (NL) Fru formand, det samme gælder den nederlandske oversættelse af dette punkt B. Der står som oversættelse af appeasement — heldigvis er den oprindelige tekst engelsk — een poli­tiek van concessies.
Mr Mommersteeg (PPE). — (NL) Madam President, the same can be said of the Dutch translation of recital B, which refers to a 'policy of concessions' rather than 'appeasement', the original text fortunately being in English.
Vel, en forhandling er selvfølgelig altid noget med indrømmelser og modydelser. Det er imidlertid en forkert oversættelse af ordet appease­ment, og jeg må sige til Dem, at for mit vedkom­mende kunne ordet appeasement blive stående i den nederlandske tekst, idet det er et fast begreb.
Negotiation is, of course, always a process of concessions and counterconcessions.
Hvis ikke, må det i hvert fald oversættes rigtigt.
Otherwise, a correct translation must certainly be found.
Formanden. — Fru Castle, jeg kan naturligvis ikke gå ind på indholdet af Deres erklæring, men jeg beklager meget: der står klart i andet afsnit af artikel 48, stk. 2, hvordan der kan gøres indsigelse, når listen læses op i salen.
President. — Mrs Castle, I cannot of course go into the substance of your statement, but I very much regret that the second sub­paragraph of Rule 48 (2) clearly lays down the way in which an objection can be raised when the list is read out in the House.
Reglen er den, at en gruppe eller mindst 21 medlemmer skriftligt kan gøre indsigelse mod beslutningen, med angivelse af grunde, og foreslå, at Parlamentet fjerner en sag eller sætter den på listen.
The rule is that a political group or at least 21 Members may oppose the decision in writing, stating their reasons, and move that Parliament abandon a topic or have it included.
Afstemningen om indsigelserne skal' finde sted uden forhandling, når mødet genoptages, og det er det, vi gør nu.
The vote on the objections shall take place without debate at the resumption of the sitting, and this is what we are doing now.
Jeg beklager derfor, fru Castle, men uanset hvilke grunde De kan have til Deres forslag, og jeg er sikker på at de deles af mange, er vi ikke i stand til at behandle Deres anmodning.
I therefore regret, Mrs Castle, that whatever reason you may have for putting this forward to the House, a reason which I am sure is shared by many, we are not able to consider your request.
Ifølge artikel 57 er De faktisk i Deres fulde ret til som formand at antage forslaget.
Under Rule 57 you are perfectly entitled, as President, to accept that motion.
Det er Dem, der afgør, om det skal antages eller afvises.
It is up to you to accept or reject it.
Haagerup (L). — (EN) Undskyld, fru formand, men det er tilfældigvis mig, der er den hovedansvarlige for dette forslag, og jeg mener, at ordet appeasement er blevet oversat forkert til alle sprog fra engelsk — også på dansk helt forkert.
Mr Haagerup (L). — I beg an apology, Madam Presi­dent, but it so happens that I am the principal author of this particular motion, and it seems that in all languages except English this word 'appeasement' has been translated wrongly — very wrong in the Danish language as well.
Hvis vi bare kunne enes om, at der er en forkert oversættelse af dette ord, tror jeg det ville være lettere for alle sprog.
If we could simply accept that there is a wrong transla­tion of that particular word, then I think it will be easier for all languages.
Formanden. — Jeg beklager, hr. Enright, jeg vil ikke i diskussion med Dem — De er jo ekspert i forret­ningsordenen — men vi har kun med artikel 48 at gøre.
President. — I am sorry, Mr Enright, I do not wish to have an argument with you — an expert on the Rules of Procedure — but we are dealing only with Rule 48.
Der er bestemte artikler, der drejer sig om uopsættelig forhandling, og artikel 48 dækker kun uopsættelig forhandling — og det var jo det, fru Castle henholdt sig til.
There are special rules which deal with topical and urgent debates ; Rule 48 covers only these, and this, of course, what Mrs Castle was referring to.
Formanden. — Hr. Haagerup, når vi kommer til afstemningen om forslaget til beslutning, skal jeg minde forsamlingen om oversættelsen af dette ord.
President. — Mr Haagerup, when we come to vote on that motion for a resolution I will remind the House of the translation of this particular word.
Lizin (S). — (FR) Fru formand, blandt de uopsætte­lige sager findes en henvendelse til Kommissionen om et jordskælv i en egn, som jeg kender godt: Liège.
Mrs Lizin (S). — (FR) Madam President, the list of subjects for topical and urgent debate includes a request to the Commission concerned with an earth tremor in a region which I know well : Liège.
Kommissionen har netop vedtaget at yde støtte til denne egn.
The Commission has now decided to grant aid to that region.
Jeg foreslår, at vi tager hele listen med stemmeforklaringer og derefter afstemningen om forslagene til beslutning.
I propose that we take the whole list of explanations of vote and then vote on the motions for resolutions before the House.
Sir Peter Vanneck (ED). — (EN) Jeg forstår forman­dens dilemma, men det forekommer mig virkelig, at vi kommer i en fuldstændig Alice i Eventyrland­situa­tion, hvis det udtryk er dækkende, hvis vi skal høre på stemmeforklaringer til forslag til beslutning af fru Focke, hr. Jaquet, hr. Fanti og hr. Boyes.
Sir Peter Vanneck (ED). — I appreciate the dilemma of the Chair, but it does seem to me posi­tively Alice in Wonderland, if that translates adequately, that we should listen to explanations of vote on the motions for resolutions by Mrs Focke, Mr Jaquet, Mr Fanti and Mr Boyes.
Hvis nemlig hr. Barbis beslutningsforslag vedtages, bortfalder naturligvis de andre.
If, in fact, the motion for a resolution by Mr Barbi is passed, then, of course,
Simmonds (ED). — (EN) Til forretningsordenen, fru formand, blot for at gratulere Dem med Deres embedsførelse i eftermiddag.
Sir Peter Vanneck then we cannot afford bias in this place against those of us who are fighting for peace against the people over there who are trying .to destroy everything that many of our forefathers have built over the years.
(Bifald fra midten og fra højre)
(Mixed reactions) the others fall.
Formanden. —, Det er naturligvis meget beklageligt, sir Peter, at folk, efter at vi i går havde en dybtgående tre timers debat, stadig må komme med stemme forklaringer i dag.
President. — Of course, Sir Peter, it is very regret table, when we have had three hours' full debate yesterday, that people should still have to make explanations of vote today.
Men sådan er Parlamentets forret ningsorden, og den må jeg følge.
Nevertheless, this is the rule of the House and I must follow it.
Collins (S). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg forsøgte at lytte med den største opmærksomhed og interesse til det, hr. Boyes sagde, men på grund af spektaklet kunne jeg ikke høre det.
Mr Simmonds (ED). — Madam President, my point of order is merely to congratulate you on your chairing of the meeting this afternoon.
Måske De ville bede ham om at gentage det for os.
(Applause from the centre and from the right)
Boyes (S). — (EN) Jeg synes, det var en skrækkelig erklæring fra formanden, der beklager, at folk skal komme med stemmeforklaringer.
Mr Boyes (S). — I think that was a terrible statement from the Chair, regretting that people have to make explanations of vote.
Jeg vil gerne minde Dem om, at stemmeforklaringer er en meget værdi fuld rettighed for Parlamentet; den bør forsvares, uanset hvor meget det måtte genere denne eller hin.
I might remind you that explanations of vote are a very valuable right in this Parliament and should be defended, no matter how much they may inconvenience some people.
Formanden. — Hr. Collins, hr. Boyes har haft ordet til forretningsordenen, og det må vist være nok for denne gang.
President. — Mr Collins, Mr Boyes has had his point of order and I think that is enough for once.
De vil kunne læse det in extenso i det fuldstændige mødereferat i morgen.
You will be able to read it, in full, in the verbatim report of proceedings tomorrow.
Men uanset hvad man siger her i salen, skal jeg sørge for, at forretningsordenen overholdes. Der vil nu komme stemmeforklaringer fra dem, der har skrevet sig på listen, og for øjeblikket er det 27.
Nevertheless, whatever anybody says in this House, I have to ensure that the Rules of Procedure are followed.
Hvis man nu vil være så venlig at gå i gang med stemmeforklaringerne, vil jeg være forsamlingen meget taknemlig.
It is not to the honour and prestige of this House if you continue, as Mr Boyes has said, during a very impor tant matter to carry on conversations and not listen to the explanations of vote.
Formanden. — Jeg vil nu over for forsamlingen rejse ' spørgsmålet om afstemningen om Arndt-beslutningen.
President. — I now wish to put to the House the problem of voting on the Arndt resolution.
Det blev vedtaget kl. 15, at det skulle være det næste på dagsordenen. Jeg må imidlertid påpege, at klokken nu er 18.
It was decided at 3 p.m. that this would be the next item on the agenda.
Der er ca. 95 ændringsforslag, og det betyder, at vi umuligt kan gøre afstemningen færdig før kl. 19.
There are about 95 amendments, which means that we could not possibly finish this vote until 7 p.m.
Det vil igen sige, hvis Kommissionen og forsamlingen er indforstået med det, at vi kan tage spørgsmålene til Kommissionen fra kl. 19 til 20.
This would mean, if the Commission were agreeable and the House is agreeable, that we would take Question time to the Commission between 7 p.m. and 8 p.m.
Efter stemmeforklaringerne om forslagene til beslutning »Euromissiler« og »Forhandlingerne i Geneve«
After the explanations of vote on the Barbi motion for a resolution and the motions for resolutions on the Geneva negotiations
(Formandens forslag vedtoges) Forslag til afgørelse Efter fjerde led — Ændringsforslag nr. 73
(Parliament agreed to this proposal by the President) Proposal for a decision After the fourth recital : Amendment No 73
Boyes (S). — (EN) Fru formand, for det første synes jeg, De skulle give ethvert medlem ordet, der ønsker at komme med et indlæg til forretningsordenen.
Mr Boyes (S). — Madam President, first of all I think that you should call any Member when he asks to raise a point of order.
For det andet mener jeg, at De i eftermiddag har været partisk i Deres embedsførelse.
Secondly, I think that your chairmanship this afternoon has been biased.
Jeg har lagt mærke til, at når folk fra venstre, anti-atomfolk, har talt, har der været en spærreild af snak fra de reaktionære, ellers så sjældent tilstedeværende folk til højre, og ...
I have noticed that when people from the left, anti-nuclear people, have been speaking, there has been a barrage of noise from reactionary backwoodsmen on the right and ...
(Kraftig protest fra højre)
(Loud protests from the right)
Formanden. — Undskyld, hr. Arndt, men jeg har fået en anden instruks i mine formandspapirer.
President. — I am sorry, Mr Arndt, I have a different instruction on my information sheet.
Vil De være så venlig at gentage det, for min instruks her er anderledes?
Would you be very kind and repeat that again because I have a different instruction here ?
Tidligere i dag nævnte De oven i købet hr. Enright ved navn, da han kom med tilråb.
Earlier in the day you even mentioned my friend Enright by name when he was shouting.
Men den reaktionære mand derovre råbte højere, end der nogen sinde før er blevet råbt her i Parlamentet, og der var ikke et ord fra formanden.
Yet this reactionary man here was shouting louder than anybody has ever shouted in this Parliament, but not a word came from the Chair.
Jeg ser ikke deri
Page 153
Forth er Parlamentets afgørelse, mener jeg ikke, vi kan omgøre denne afgørelse.
Pursuant to Rule 74(4) of our Rules of Procedure, compromise amendments may be put to the vote first, and all other amendments are then deemed to fall.
Jeg mener, at hvis vi skal have ekstra ændringsforslag på trods af, at vi tager kompromisændringsforslagene først, skulle dette have været gjort klart på forhånd.
Consequently, may I request the President to apply Rule 74(4) to Amendments Nos 73 to 84 when we reach them (I will point this out in each case) ?
noget om, at kompromisændringsforslag skal behandles først.
President. — Mr Arndt, we cannot split amendments like that.
Vi må virkelig ikke af nogen lade os forlede til at tro, at forretningsordenen siger noget, som den åbenlyst ikke siger, i hvert fald ikke i den engelske version.
I think that if we were going to have extra amendments, despite taking the compromise amendments, this should have been clarified beforehand.
Arndt (S), ordfører. — (DE) Årsagen til det var: vi har kun taget de ting, der var kompromiser, med ind i forslaget.
Mr Forth (ED). — Madam President, I would invite you to read the text of Rule 74 (4).
Men vi må stemme om det, fordi forslaget er et tillægsforslag.
I would have thought that it was entirely up to your discretion as to how you take compromise amendments.
Jeg bebudede udtrykke ligt i budgetudvalget, at jeg ville foreslå det på den måde her.
We must really not be misled by anyone into supposing that the rule says what it patently does not say, at least not in the English text.
Formanden. — Hr. Forth, jeg må fortælle Dem, at det i artikel 74, stk. 4, hedder, at formanden skal indhente Parlamentets godkendelse af at sætte sådanne ændringsforlsag under afstemning.
President. — Mr Forth, I must tell you that Rule 74 (4) states that the President shall obtain the agreement of Parliament in putting such amendments to the vote.
Hvis jeg har Parlamentets godkendelse, kan jeg gøre det.
If I have the agreement of Parliament I can do so.
Hvis jeg ikke har Parlamentets godkendelse, kan jeg ikke gøre det.
If I do not have the agreement of Parliament, I cannot.
Det håber jeg, De vil acceptere.
I hope you will accept that.
Formanden. — Men hr. Arndt, jeg forstår, at hele ændringsforslag nr. 86 ikke er aldeles foreneligt med ændringsforslag nr. 76.
President. — But Mr Arndt, I understand that the whole of Amendment No 86 is not totally compatible with Amendment No 76.
Hvad beder De altså om afstemning om?
Therefore, what are you asking to be voted on ?
von der Vring (S). — (DE) Fru formand, vil De ved ændringsforslag nr. 74 spørge ordføreren, om det ændringsforslag nr. 32, hvorom jeg ved, at det er i budgetudvalgets ånd, bortfalder ved afstemningen om nr. 74, eller om der bagefter skal stemmes om det som supplement?
Mr von der Vring (S). — (DE) Madam President, would you kindly, in connection with Amendment No 74, ask the rapporteur whether Amendment No 32, which, I understand, complies with the wishes of the Committee on Budgets, would fall as a result of the vote on Amendment No 74, or if Amendment No 32 may be put to the vote subsequently as an addition ?
Må vi bede om ordførerens opfat-
President. — Can we please have the view of the rapporteur ?
Arndt (S), ordfører. — (DE) Endnu en gang: ændringsforslag nr. 86 giver en tilføjelse og ændrer ikke ændringsforslag nr. 76.
Mr Arndt (S), rapporteur. — (DE) To repeat : Amendment No 86 supplements, but does not in any way alter, Amendment No 76.