natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Problemet er, at i disse internationale, europæiske programmer står virkomhederne og universiteterne over for særlige problemer.
Why is the Commission totally opposed to the Parliament's involvement in the procedure of the regulatory and management commitees?
Uden dem kan de ikke gøre noget som helst.
How is modern Community business conducted?
Store virksomheder har også brug for midler, da en hurtig iværksættelse af projekter på europæisk plan selv for dem er umulig uden midler.
It is conducted largely through legislation called the framework directive or the framework legislation.
Jeg mener derfor, at der er to ting, der er vitale, og som Rådet bør tænke på i det kommende halvår.
That is to say, a rather broadly based draft is put to the Parliament on which it is consulted, a draft con taining half-a-dozen, perhaps 10, perhaps even as many as 20 articles.
For det første behovet for en vis hastighed og for det andet behovet for en europæisk dimension.
That draft then goes to the Coun cil and it is adopted by the Council.
Det er vitalt, hvis vi skal redde de europæiske informationsteknologi- og telekommunikationserhverv — blot for at tage to overordentlig store markeder.
One of its clauses says that implementing provisions under this draft shall be made either exclusively by the Commission or by the Commission in conjunction with the Council.
Partie, formand for Rådet. — (EN) Hr. formand, det glæder mig meget at få lejlighed til at tale i Parlamentet på dette tidlige tidspunkt af vort formandskab og besvare den forespørgsel, hr. Turner, hr. Sälzer, hr. Poniatowski og hr. Linkohr har stillet.
This morning President Delors already expressed his appreciation, that I wish to emphasize again now, of the realism, lucidity and balance of Mr Hänsch's report, and then made clear the Commission's position on some specific points that we consider to be of particular importance.
Jeg har til hen sigt at besvare deres forspørgsel på Rådets vegne i min egenskab af formand, men med Deres tilladelse vil jeg gerne tilføje nogle særlige perspektiver ud fra Det forenede Kongeriges synspunkt.
Sometimes the implementing provisions made under these framework directives are quite harmless, are technical, need not concern us.
Vi glæder os over, at Parlamentet anerkender dette i sin beslutning.
President. — The next item is the oral question with­out debate (Doc.
Efter vor opfattelse giver det nye rammeprogram mulighed for at tilvejebringe en nyorientering af Fællesskabets forskning og udvikling for at styrke den europæiske industris videnskabelige og teknologiske grundlag og hjælpe de europæiske virksomheder til at konkurrere med De forenede Stater og Japan.
Β 2-554/86) by Mrs Ewing, on behalf of the Committee on Youth, Culture, Educa­tion, Information and Sport, to the Council on the Comett programme, a Council decision which departed from the Commission's proposal and Parlia­ment's opinion.
Fællesskabet kan på denne måde give forskningen en markant merværdi.
Mr Ewing (RDE). — Mr President, my committee was unanimous in deciding that Comett must at all costs commence.
Dette er af vital betydning for alle, men måske særlig for medlemsstaterne med små nationale programmer.
It is so important, it must commence, notwithstanding that a drastic reduction in time and finance is now proposed by the Council.
Vedrørende Rådet af forskningsministres arbejdsprogram for det andet halvår af 1986 vil dette programs hovedtræk være behandlingen af Kommissionens for melle forslag om det nye rammeprogram.
Whilst appreciating this need and agreeing with it, I have to say that in our case it must be reconciled with the absolute necessity — as recalled by Mr Musso — to simplify and accelerate the Community's already over-complex system of decision-making, with the particular aim of limiting the powers of the Council by introducing precise conditions for the taking of execu­tive decisions.
Rådet for venter at modtage dette forslag fra Kommissionen i løbet af juli. og behandlingen vil straks begynde i Rådets arbejdsgrupper.
President Delors explained the reasons why the Com­mission cannot support the amendments that set out to give Parliament a formal say in Committee proce­dures, such as by formally introducing, for example, a consultative procedure.
Rådet forventer at få den første drøftelse af forslaget på sit møde den 21. oktober og om muligt træffe en afgørelse på sit møde den 9. december.
I have several questions. First of all, in view of the reduction to 45 million ECU and four years instead of seven, could I ask what the Council thinks.
Spørgsmålet vedrører innovation og ud nyttelse af forskningen.
The Commission have indicated that they want a Head of Division and three or four staff but the budget only provides for one man.
Den fælles akt udtrykker sig igen klart om betydningen af dette.
Well this really is a very serious situation.
Rådet vil være meget opmærksom på disse aspekter i rammeprogrammet, når det modtager Kommissionens formelle forslag.
So I ask if the President-in-Office could give his view on the staffing situation, and if he cannot say very much today could he at least give a firm promise that the matter will be reviewed in the second year of Comett?
Rådet tillæger det stor betydning at opnå enighed om det nye rammeprogram inden årets udgang og nå til afgørelse om så mange særskilte forslag som muligt. Vi vil gå i gang med vort formandskab i en positiv og konstruktiv ånd, energisk og fast besluttede på at nå dette mål.
But here, if I may reply unhesitatingly to Lady Elles, I would say that the Commission, in the spirit of its pro­posals and also of Mr Prout's proposals, is ready, within the framework of an agreement between our two institutions, to inform Parliament continuously and in detail, communicating to it the drafts of the measures that it sends to the committees.
Vi har indtrængende henstillet til Kom missionen at fremlægge forslagene ved førstkommende lejlighed. Deres beslutning bekræfter, at Parlamentet er enig i, at det haster.
In short, the Commission undertakes to submit an annual report, and that will be the occasion for our two institutions — which, as Mr Prout has recalled, went in step together through the bitter and difficult experience of the Intergovernmental Conference — to take stock each year and clarify the situation, in the full know­ledge of all the facts.
Evaluering. Det forenede Kongerige på sin side har en særlig interesse vedrørende Fællesskabets forskning og udvikling, som vi mener både Rådet og Kommissionen bør være meget opmærksom på. Jeg henviser til evaluering, og Deres beslutning viser vist, at De er enig heri.
If any problems should arise on specific cases, the Commission is clearly ready to discuss them with Par­liament at a suitable time and in accordance with pro­cedures that we shall have to decide together.
Vi er overbevist om, at forskning og udvikling bør have en høj prioritet ved fordelingen af Fællesskabets egne indtægter.
What were the reasons for Germany's opposi­tion and for the UK's lack of enthusiasm?
Det er et spørgsmål, som vi gerne vil se løst straks.
Were these matters of principle?
Dette kan opnås ved at opstille klare kriterier for programudvælgelsen, der sikrer en høj videnskabelig og teknologisk kvalitet og en klar fællesskabsdimension.
If they were not matters of principle, then why the reduction, in view of the constant exhorta­tions in this House that in high technology we proceed and advance so that we can compete more effectively with Japan and the USA?
Fremme af den industrielle konkurrencedygtighed er også af central betydning for Kommissionens intention om at foreslå ændringer af de nuværende programmer, f. eks. Esprit og Brite.
Lastly, can the President-in-Office give us some assur­ance please, today, that this matter will be looked at again in relation to finance, duration and administra­tion staffing at the end of the second year of Comett?
Det fælles forskningscenter er særlig vigtigt her.
President. — The debate is closed.
Pattie pæiske teknologiske samarbejde.
There have been many doubts in this House about the intentions behind Eureka.
Vi har mulighed for nu, da begge programmer befinder sig i en udviklingsfase, at skabe en sammenhængende strategi for den europæiske forskning og udvikling.
Therefore, I am very glad indeed that a couple of weeks ago the Commission declared its interest in 0.9 billion ECUs worth of pro­jects out of a total of 2.2 billion.
Det britiske formandskab agter at gribe lejligheden.
I hope the Minister will enlarge on this.
Vi får måske ikke den samme chance igen.
In other words, the Commission is actually taking an active part in a very large part of Eureka.
Når vi behandler de vigtige programmer af industriel relevans, bør vi indføre noget af den yderst markeds orienterede tankegang, som industrien selv ville an vende.
Mr Pattie, President-in-Office of the Council. — Mr President, we are dealing today with a matter which both the Council and Parliament consider to be particularly important.
Desuden bør vi undersøge, om Fællesskabet fortsat bør finansiere programmer som Eureka med 50%. Ville en lavere gennemsnitlig støtte eller en støtte, der blev nedtrappet gennem et projekts leve tid, kunne forsvares som et middel til at få industrien til at deltage med henblik på kommerciel udnyttelse? se?
The Council entirely shares the view that the Comett programme should start up as quickly as possible and that the Council position represents a sound basis for the commencement.
Formanden. — Jeg har modtaget tre forslag til beslut ning med anmodning om afstemning snarest muligt som afslutning på forhandlingen om den mundtlige forespørgsel :
Article 6 of the decision provides for reassessment by 31 December 1988 of the amount available for the final year under the present decision and makes explicit reference to the possibility of the continuation of the programme after 31 December 1989.
Vi vil gerne behandle disse spørgsmål og håber, at Kommissionen forelægger fantasirige og konstruktive forslag.
The for­mer is impossible without the latter, and the latter is pointless without the former, Of course Eureka is not a strategic research programme.
— af Cervetti m.fl. om den europæiske forskningspolitik (dok. B2-521/86);
Your question also refers to the committee which will assist the Commission in implementing the Comett programme.
Afstemningen om anmodningen om afstemning snarest muligt finder sted ved forhandlingens afslutning. ning.
I hope these remarks have reassured you that the Council shares your concern for an efficient and ade­quate Community programme for technological edu­cation and training.
Problemet er, at mange af de europæiske virksomheder allerede er bange for, at det ikke lykkes dem.
Firstly, it must bring together comple­mentary strengths in technology that exist across the frontiers in the EEC.
Vi hørte i går fra hr. Delors, at mange af dem allerede søger forbindelser med amerikanske virksomheder, så de har noget at falde tilbage på i tilfælde af, at Eureka ikke lykkes.
Secondly, it must fill technical gaps which exist and are dangerous to the future of EEC competitiveness when we compare ourselves with other modern areas in the world.
Det er netop i den sammenhæng, det rammeprogram bør ses, der er et af hovedemnerne for denne mundtlige forespørgsel og forhandling.
Thirdly, it must prevent national duplication, such as the notorious and scandalous duplication in telecommunications which exists with 12 different systems in 12 European coun­tries.
Jeg vil gerne anvende de par minutter, jeg har, på at behandle nogle af de praktiske aspekter ved programmet.
This, therefore, is the purpose of the framework directive.
Afslutningsvis vil jeg gerne sige et par ord om Eureka.
The Comett programme as now approved offers us that.
Kommissionens aktive medvirken som medlem af Eureka, placeringen af det lille Eureka-sekretariat i Bruxelles, som der nu er opnået enighed om, og den professionelle kommissionsrepræsentant i det sekretariat vil medvirke til at sikre en passende koordinering af det, der efter planen skal være to komplementære forskningsbestræbelser.
In fact, Esprit and the others have brought together more than a thousand companies, universities, laboratories and institutes all separated by frontiers.
På Det forenede Kongeriges vegne som fratrædende formand for Eureka vil jeg gerne understrege den betydning, vi tillægger dette program.
They have all been greatly oversubscribed: Esprit was oversubscribed 4 times, Brite 3 times and the biotechnology pro­grammes 10 times.
Minister konferencens meget vellykkede resultat er blevet refereret i vide kredse.
Thus industry's demand for these projects is clear.
I løbet af kun ét år er Eureka blevet et vigtigt europæisk initiativ, der er baseret på en markedsorienteret strategi med industribaserede projekter.
Industry decides what they shall be and what teams shall take part in what projects.
Bekendtgørelsen af omkring 60 projekter til en samlet værdi på over 2 mia ECU er et virkelig bemærkelsesværdigt skridt fremad inden for det højteknologiske samarbejde i Europa.
We must, therefore, pay full attention to industry's assess­ments of the value of Community programmes.
Som nogle måske ved, har jeg personligt været meget inddraget i arbejdet med Eureka, og jeg er overbevist om, at hvis det udvikles i nær forbindelse med Fællesskabets forskning og ud vikling, vil det være et vigtigt fremskridt for det euro
Β 2-435/86), tabled by Mr Turner, on behalf of the European Democratic Group, Mr Salzer on behalf of the Group of the European People's Party, Mr Poniatowski and Mr Linkohr, to the Coun­cil, on European research policy.
Det skal starte et eller andet sted.
Those are the principles.
En eller anden må afgøre, hvad der bør gøres.
I now come to the sore issue of funding.
Vi giver det derfor ikke den fulde støtte og følger afgørelsernes eller henstillingernes logik. Så kommer vi til pro grammet.
I have tabled an amendment which shows, I hope, that this judgement is premature.
Adam nye GD 13 vil påtage sig mere af dette arbejde, efter hånden som det kommer i gang.
Turner amendment will be adopted and that if it is, the Coun cil will fulfil what my amendment asks for.
Jeg mener, at Is land i bl.a. geotermiske spørgsmål har stor kompetence. ce.
a united technical agreement as to what they are trying to get.
Vi glæder os over oprettelsen af et sekretariat af beskedent omfang i Bruxelles.
To do this they will need to use the risk-assessment models which the JRC has been producing on nuclear safety.
Så er der spørgsmålet om finansiering.
I therefore regard this aspect of the JRC problem as separate.
Vi fordobler det tal, som vi mener passer for øjeblikket, og siger 6%.
It arises partly because of Chernobyl.
En løsning på 6% til den europæiske forskning og udvikling, 6% af 1,4%.
We were, of course, content to have them working on nuclear waste and so on, but now we have a bigger problem, namely the safety of design.
Og det nuværende pro gram er allerede reduceret med 25%, og der er ingen generel sikkerhed for, at endog de 6% af vore samle de udgifter vil være acceptable. Vi taler om konkurrence og vor position i forhold til lande som De for enede Stater og Japan.
For that also Europe needs European-wide research, such as the JRC provides in the nuclear field.
Men hvad mener vi med det te? Hvor er vi nu?
These are no doubt home truths to all of those who hold them.
Hvor vil vi gerne være? Hvilke planer har vi?
They do not necessarily apply in the same manner to Europe's needs.
Da Esprit blev introduceret, fik vi at vide, at det var nødvendigt, fordi vi var nødt til at rette op på vore betalingsbalancer.
Unlike national projects, we have to create for the first time a technological pool as big and as united as that in the United States.
Men på elektronikmarkedet, inden for informationsteknologi og telekommunikation går vi stadig baglæns.
The potential is here — it is as great as that of the United States and it is three times as great as that of Japan — and we have to bring it together.
Vi bør sætte os nogle mål, så vi kan vurdere vor præstation.
The problem is that in these international European schemes companies and universities face special problems.
En del af problemet er selvfølgelig, at rammeprogrammet, som vi kender det, er ujævnt.
There is the inertia of getting across the frontiers, the unfamiliarity of getting across the frontiers, and there are actual barriers such as language.
Vi udarbejder noget, som vi kalder et flerårigt program, og tror, at fordi det løber i et par år og efterfølges af et andet program, at det hele går meget glat.
It is absolutely vital, therefore, that there should be adequate funding under the framework directive for small companies, as they make up half the companies which take part in the schemes.
Han vil se, at det næsten er som en sten, man slår smut med hen over vandfladen.
Large companies also require funding, because even for them the speedy adoption of European-scale projects is impossible without funding.
Den tager er spring og så et kortere spring og standser kort tid efter.
So I believe two things are vital which the Council must bear in mind over the next six months.
Det er det, der sker med meget af det arbejde, vi lægger i separate forskningsaktioner.
Firstly, the need for speed and, secondly, the need for a European scale.
En lang periode — undertiden i Vi år — hvor der sker meget lidt, ganske enkelt på grund af de procedurer, vi arbejder under.
They are vital if we are to save the European-based information technology and telecommunications industries — just to take two enormous markets. kets.
Vi håber, at Eureka-projektet og Fællesskabets aktion bliver reelt komplementære og ikke konkurrerende, hvilket forudsætter, at man afgrænser de to aktion sområder for at undgå overflødige gentagelser og overlapninger, og at man organiserer forbindelserne mellem dem godt.
Mr Pattie, President-in-Office of the Council. — Mr President, I am very pleased to have this opportunity to speak to the Parliament at this early stage in our Presidency and to respond to the question put by Mr Turner, Mr Sälzer, Mr Poniatowski and Mr Linkohr.
Det er nødvendigt, at gøre det helt klart, at Fællesskabet fortsat har det fulde ansvar for forsknings- og teknologipolitikken på det før-konkur-renceorienterede stadium.
I intend to reply to their question on behalf of the Council in my capacity as President-in-Office but with your permission I should like to add some particular perspectives from the point of view of the United Kingdom.
Kontraktforsinkelser gør ikke noget til at hjælpe de små industrier eller nogle af de universiteter og tekniske skoler, som vi gerne vil have inddraget i disse programmer.
Parliament's interest in the Community's R and D activities has already been demonstrated by the resolution you passed on 9 June.
Hvis man gerne vil være særlig kynisk, kan man sige, at dette er for at forsinke tingene yderligere.
I hope that my presence here today will initiate a constructive dialogue between Council and Parliament during the term of our Presidency.
Dette er således de problemer, som jeg håber ministeren vil se på.
Therefore, let the Council use all the valid yardsticks it can find, or wishes to use, to measure what should be spent and on what priorities.
Vi skal inve stere mere i vor fremtid, og der bør ikke spares unødvendigt på pengene.
When it has measured the need genuinely and announced what it is, let it genuinely meet it.
Hvilket enhedsmarked?
These are special case.
Man har forudset et enhedsmarked for De Tolvs Europa.
They are not like the projects I have mentioned which share cost.
Et teknologisk Europa er en umulighed uden ensartethed i normerne.
Mr Linkohr, a Socialist member of the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology, has a working party on this.
Og et teknologisk Euro pa er ligeledes en umulighed uden åbning af de of fentlige markeder. Man taler om en Eureka-etiket.
I stress again that practical industry evaluation should be the basis of all our decisions as to what is needed.
Hvis der skal være en Eureka-etiket, må den give ret til fordele, navnlig hvad angår adgang til de offentlige markeder.
The Council expects to hold a first discussion of the proposal at its meeting on 21 October and if possible to adopt a decision at its meeting on 9 December.
Der vil ikke blive noget teknologisk Euro pa uden juridiske og finansielle foranstaltninger til lettelse af samarbejde, ja endog fusion mellem euro pæiske virksomheder.
Other important issues which the Coun cil expects to consider include proposals from the Commission for the second phase of Esprit and pro posed revisions of the Brite, biotechnology, stimulation, fusion, radiation protection, radioactive waste and non-nuclear energy programmes.
Mener De virkelig, at det vil være lettere at nå frem til disse resultater med nitten deltagere i stedet for tolv?
In addition, proposals for the definitive RACE programme and proposals for the Delta and Drive programmes should be submitted to the Council during the United King dom presidency.
Jeg rejser herved spørgsmålet.
The Council may also be called upon to consider pro-
Mallet (PPE). — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, vi glæder os over de positive resultater på den tredje
After Chernobyl, the European Parliament called for international consultation on reactor design safety.
Det andet spørgsmål drejer sig om, hvorvidt det finansielle problem er løst.
This would, I believe, include in the very near future international consultation on the modification of the other Chernobyl-type reactors in the Soviet Union.
Hvad venter vi os af det britiske formandskab?
We shall approach our Presidency in a positive and constructive spirit, vigorous and determined to achieve this objective.
lysende, at det er det ikke.
Evaluation.
Tillad mig en grovhed: jeg har indtryk af, at de offentlige myndigheder i flere lande lader sig inspirere af en film, der, hvis jeg hus­ker ret, hed »Hvordan man får succes uden at røre en finger«.
We also agree that the newframework programme should reflect the political commitment to growth in R and D expenditure but — and it is an important qualification — we must avoid confusion of more with better.
Hvordan skal det lykkes at skabe det tekno­logiske Europa uden at betale med sin person, dvs. uden at bevilge de nødvendige offentlige midler til gennemførelse af store projekter?
The UK believes most strongly that what is needed is not simply more research but more effective research, that the quality of research programmes is more important than the quantity.
Jeg vil til sidst give udtryk for en frygt.
Industrial competitiveness.
Jeg frygter, at Eureka­projektet, som ikke er et tilstrækkeligt svar på den store udfordring, jeg har omtalt, og som kan siges at fungere som et figenblad for et teknologisk Europa, der nærmest er nøgent i visse sektorer, skal komme til at spille rollen som alibi til at formindske omfan­get af det rammeprogram, som vi om kort tid skal drøfte, og at det endog kan blive en erstatning for et virkeligt europæisk teknologifællesskab, som er og bliver vort mål.
In the Council's discussion of the Commission's guideline paper on the framework programme, it has already become clear that programmes promoting industrial competitiveness should be given high priority in the Commission's formal proposal on the framework programmes. This could be achieved by the establishment of clear criteria for programme selection which ensure high scientific and technological quality and a clear Community dimension.
Hvad angår budgetbevillingerne, er det klart, at de for øjeblikket opførte er utilstrækkelige, og at det er van­skeligt for os at acceptere dem.
Vigorous scrutiny and appraisal of national R and D programmes is a permanent feature in the UK and other Member States.
På dette bevillingsom­råde ønsker vi, at formandskabet tager det fælles forskningscenters situation op til ny vurdering, idet dets situation er foruroligende, navnlig Ispra­centret.
During our Presidency we shall be looking for the adoption of similar disciplines by the Community.
Dette center skal absolut have tildelt opgaver inden for de forskningsmæssige prioriteter.
In formulating the new framework, we must pay particular attention to the way in which programmes are managed, assessed and evaluated.