natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Grundlæggende for skabelsen af ét marked er også harmonisering.
Also basic to the establishment of the single market is harmonization.
Her er Kommissionens holdning klar: hvor det ikke er nødvendigt i øjeblikket at harmoni sere nationale bestemmelser, skal medlemsstaterne afholde sig fra at lægge nogen hindringer i vejen for handelen.
Here the Commission's line is clear: where it is not necessary actually to harmonize national rules, Member States must refrain from placing any obstacles in the way of trade.
Men harmonisering er ikke noget universalmiddel.
But harmonization is not a panacea.
Direktiverne skal vedtages, omsættes og gennemføres ordentligt.
Directives have to be adopted, transposed and properly implemented.
Forholdet er, at dette, som nogle af de ærede medlemmer har påpeget, og som betænkningen påpeger, simpelt hen ikke altid sker.
The fact is that this, as a number of honourable Members have stated and as stated in the report, simply does not always happen.
På dette område kan Parlamentets bistand være uvurderlig, specielt bistanden gennem de nationale parlamenter, som i mange tilfælde kan spille en meget aktiv rolle i forbindelse med direktivernes omsættelse til intern ret.
In this field Parliament's help can be invaluable, particularly the help given through national parliaments, which in many cases have a very active role to play in the transposition of directives.
I denne forbindelse vil jeg gerne kort gå lidt uden for emnet og tale om situationen med hensyn til Grækenland og de to nye medlemsstater Spanien og Portugal.
In this connection I would like to digress briefly to speak of the situation concerning Greece and the two incoming Member States, Spain and Portugal.
Hvad angår Grækenland, kan den holdning, som Kommissionen har indtaget gennem de sidste to år, beskrives som en tilskyndelse til at overholde loven.
As far as Greece is concerned, the line taken by the Commission in the last two years can be described as one of encouragement to observe the law.
Jeg tror, at det har kunnet betale sig, som det vil fremgå af den næste årsberetning.
I think it has paid off, as the next annual report will illustrate.
Jeg må sige, at de fleste af punkterne i den beslutning, som Parlamentet nu anmodes om at vedtage, er kor rekte, og de er berettigede reaktioner på det, der i hovedtræk er et temmelig negativt billede, eftersom Kommissionens årsberetninger trods alt kun medtager problemsagerne, og jeg er bange for, at det fortsat vil være sådan, medmindre Deres årlige analyse af Kommissionens arbejde generelt skal lide under det.
I would say that most of the points in the resolution which Parliament is now being asked to adopt are valid and that they are justified reactions to what is, by and large, a pretty negative picture, since the Commission's annual reports, after all, record only the problem cases, and I am afraid it will have to stay that way unless your annual analysis of the Commission's work overall is to suffer.
Det ville selvfølgelig være teoretisk muligt til beretningen, som det anbefales i forslaget, at føje en kom mentar om kvaliteten af gennemførelsen af fælles skabsretten i hver enkelt medlemsstat.
It would, of course, be theoretically possible to add to the report, as the motion requests, a commentary on the quality of the implementation of Community law in each individual Member State.
Men de res sourcer, der kræves for at udføre dette ordentligt, overstiger langt Kommissionens muligheder.
But the resources required to do this properly lie far beyond the call of the Commission.
Yderligere kunne en dybtgående undersøgelse af præstationerne i en medlemsstat let komme til at skjule gene relt oplevede vanskeligheder ved gennemførelsen af fællesskabsretten, vanskeligheder som Kommissionens beretning bør sætte i focus af hensyn til de parlamentarikere, som helt berettiget ønsker sådanne informationer, og da også af hensyn til offentligheden som helhed.
Moreover, a pro longed scrutiny of the performance of each Member State may well serve to obscure generally experienced difficulties in the implementation of Community law, difficulties on which the Commission report should focus, for the benefit of parliamentarians who, quite properly, demand such information and, indeed, for the benefit of the public at large.
Udvalget om retlige anliggender og borgernes rettigheder klager sig i sit beslutningsforslag over den for sinkede fremsendelse af beretningen.
The Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights, in its motion for a resolution, complains about the delay in forwarding the report.
Naturligvis be klager Kommissionen, at en sådan forsinkelte har kunnet opstå.
Obviously the Commission regrets that any such delay has occurred.
Desværre var der mange detaljer, der skulle indsamles, før beretningen kunne gøres helt færdig.
Unfortunately, many details have to be garnered before the report could be fully prepared.
Hr. Delors talte også til udvalget om retlige anliggender og borgernes rettigheder om institutionernes rolle og mere specifikt om Kommissionens rolle i spørgsmålet om overholdelse af fællesskabsretten.
President Delors also spoke to the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights about the roles of the institutions and, more particularly, that of the Commission in the matter of adherence to Community law.
Kommissionen er den eneste vogter af traktaterne i kraft af sin uafhængighed, sin funktion i forbindelse med at virke for den fælles interesse og sit politiske ansvar.
The Commission is the sole custodian of the Treaties by virtue of its independence, its function in promoting the common interest and its political responsibilities.
I denne egenskab arbejder den hånd i hånd med Domstolen.
In this capacity it works in tandem with the Court of Justice.
Men vi føler virkelig ikke, at Dom stolen skal opfordres til at gøre for meget.
But we really do not feel that the Court should be asked to do too much.
Jeg vil i denne forbindelse gerne være helt ærlig.
I should like in this respect to be quite frank.
Kommissionen har intet ønske om et dele sin initiativret i henhold til traktaterne med nogen.
The Commission has no intention of sharing its right of initiative under the Treaties with anyone.
Den vil fortsætte med at udføre sit arbejde.
It will continue to do its job.
Efter min mening kan den grænse dårligt trækkes skarpere op.
It will table proposals with the Council where problems
Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne vende mig fra dette emne til nogle af de andre punkter, som konkret er blevet rejst under forhandlingen.
I just want to turn from that, Mr President, to some of the other points which have been specifically raised
Clinton Davis sonalespørgsmålet, men der er to punkter, jeg gerne vil tage op, som blev rejst af ordføreren.
Clinton Davis main issues and to take up some of the other essential points underlined by Honourable Members.
prøvet at udvælge de hovedspørgsmål, som synes at være kommet op, og at tage nogle af de andre væsentlige punkter op, som blev fremhævet af de ærede medlemmer.
during the course of the debate. I have already dealt with the point raised by Mr Turner, as far as the question of staff is concerned, but there are two points that I would like to take up which were raised by the rapporteur. porteur.
Jeg blev spurgt, om den næste beretning også vil for tælle, hvad der er sket i medfør af artikel 177 i EØF-traktaten.
I am asked whether the next report will also record what has been happening with regard to proceedings under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty.
Vi føler, at det vil være bedre at holde adskilte ting helt adskilt og lade beretningen være, som den er, dvs. at den primært giver Parlamentet en redegørelse for artikel 169-sager til dato.
We feel that it would be better to keep separate things quite separate and to leave the report as it is, i.e. concerned primarily to give Parliament an account of proceedings to date under Article 169.
Så blev jeg spurgt, om det var muligt at klassificere eller skelne imellem overtrædelserne efter graden af deres grovhed.
Then I was asked whether it was possible to classify or distinguish between infringements according to degrees of gravity.
Jeg synes, at det er et ganske rimeligt ønske, men alle overtrædelser af fællesskabsretten er alvorlige, er forkastelige.
I think it is a fair enough request but all breaches of Community law are serious and reprehensible.
Nogle skader imidlertid mere end andre udøvelsen af Fællesskabets politik eller det interne markeds funktion.
Some, however, do more harm than others to the working of Community policies or of the internal market.
Beretningens kommentarer forsøger at fremdrage forskellene.
The comments in the report do try to bring out the differences.
Vi vil fortsat forsøge at lægge vægt på det, men det er ikke altid let at udpege forskelle i grovhed inden for dette område.
We will continue to try to give emphasis to that, but it is not always easy to select different areas of gravity as far as this is concerned.
Under forhandlingerne blev der rejst en række andre spørgsmål, som jeg bør kommentere.
A number of other points were raised during the debate to which I ought to refer.
Hr. Wijsenbeek rejste vigtige spørgsmål om medlemsstaternes svigten med hensyn til gennemførelse af fællesskabsretten, og hvilken aktion Kommissionen skulle iværksætte des angående.
Mr Wijsenbeek raised important questions about the failure of Member States to apply Community law and about the act ion which the Commission should take in that respect.
Vi har kun haft tre tilfælde, hvor Kommissionen har været nødsaget til formelt at advare med lemsstater på grund af manglende gennemførelse af fællesskabsretten, to gange over for Vesttyskland og en gang sidste år over for Frankrig.
We have only had three occasions when the Commission felt obliged formally to warn Member States for failure to apply Community law. Two of these warn ings were addressed to Germany and one last year to France.
Vi har endnu ikke været nødt til i denne forbindelse at tage stk. 3 i artikel 177 i anvendelse.
We have never had recourse to Article 177, paragraph 3, in that context.
Fru Boot stillede et spørgsmål om opfølgning af Domstolens domme.
Mrs Boot raised a question about following up Coun of Justice judgments.
I den forbindelse vil jeg gerne sige, at der er en tabel, som viser de domme, der ikke er blevet fulgt op, og jeg vil henvise hende til side 28 og følgende sider.
There is a table setting out judgments which have not been followed up, and I would refer her to page 28 and succeeding pages.
Den engelske regering blev fundet skyldig i overtræ delse af direktivet om ligeløn og har siden gjort lov givningen endnu mere uforståelig og gjort det endnu vanskeligere for kvinder at få deres ret i henhold til den.
The United Kingdom Government was found to have infringed the equal pay directive and has since made the law even more unintelligible and made it more difficult for women to seek redress under it.
Jeg formoder, at Kommissionen i fremtiden vil hænge den slags ud.
I trust the Commission will in future expose this kind of practice.
Retten skal være et middel til ændring, ikke til hinder for det.
Law should be a vehicle for change, not a roadblock to it.
Den 8. november 1983 blev Det forenede Kongeriges regering igen fundet skyldig i manglende gennemførelse af EØF-direk-tivet om ligebehandling.
The United Kingdom Government was again found guilty on 8 November 1983 of failure to apply the EEC Directive on equal treatment.
Siden 1983 har der ikke været foretaget aændringer i Det forenede Kongeriges lovgivning, og der er i virkeligheden alt for utilstrækkelig omtale af dette i Kommissionens beretning.
There have been no changes made since 1983 in the United King dom law and there is insufficient mention of this in the Commission's report.
Og der er heller ingen omtale af overtrædelserne af direktivet om social sikkerhed, som Det forenede Kongeriges regering igen krænker, specielt hvad angår den bistand, der ydes til pasning af handicappede i Det forenede Kongerige.
And there is no reference to breaches of the social security directive where again the United Kingdom Government is in breach, parti cularly as regards the invalidity care allowance in operation in the United Kingdom.
Fru Dury stillede spørgsmål om, hvorvidt sanktioner kunne iværksættes over for medlemsstater, Ja, med hensyn til kul- og ståltraktaten er der selvfølgelig en mulighed for at iværksætte økonomiske sanktioner.
I trust that the Commission will also in future make more of the indirect discrimination which still continues to contravene EEC laws. The EEC directives on equal treatment are the jewel in the Community crown and I hope the Commission will, in future, do more to ensure their full application.
Men i virkeligheden er denne magt aldrig blevet an vendt, fordi det er nødvendigt at gå via Rådet.
But the reality is that these powers have never been used because of the need to go through the Council.
Vi tvivler stærkt på, at medlemsstaterne ville kunne enes om at indføre sanktioner i EØF-traktaten.
We have strong doubts that Member States would agree to include sanctions in the EEC Treaty.
Fru Dury henviste også til Bravier-sagen, en væsentlig bemærkning, og i dette tilfælde, må jeg sige, handlede Kom missionen meget hurtigt.
Mrs Dury also referred to the Gravier case, an important observation. The Commission acted very swiftly in that instance.
En hastesag blev indledt i juni, og Domstolen tog sagen op i denne måned.
Urgent proceedings were started in June and the Court was seized of this matter this month.
Kommissionen har også anmodet Domstolen om at træffe en suspensiv afgørelse, således at der med an dre ord kunne iværksættes midlertidige foranstaltninger mod Belgien, mens sagen bliver behandlet.
The Commission has also asked the Court to order a suspensive action, in other words, that interim measures against Belgium should be taken pending the outcome of the case.
Jeg finder, at det var et vigtigt forløb, som må have glædet hende.
I think that was an important development and one which I think will have satisfied her.
Jeg kan umuligt tage alle de spørgsmål op, som blev rejst under forhandlingerne, men jeg har i mit indlæg
I cannot possibly deal with all the points raised during the course of the debate, but I have tried to select the
Han kan foretage alle borgerlige handlinger, indgå kontrakter og forpligte sig i sit eget navn.
legal acts pertaining to civil life and may enter into contracts and undertakings in his own name.
Men skulle han beslutte sig til at overskride grænsen til Belgien, betragtes han som mindreårig og skal igen nem omstændelige formaliteter, før der tages hensyn til de af hans statsborgerskab følgende rettigheder som myndig.
How ever, if he decides to cross the frontier to go to work in Belgium, he is regarded there as a minor and will have to go to all kinds of trouble to secure recognition for the majority rights which he enjoys by virtue of his nationality.
Hvorfor nu del?
Why is this?
Ganske enkelt fordi myndighedsalderen i Belgien fremdeles er enogtyve år.
Quite simply because in Belgium the age of majority is still fixed at 21 years of age.
A 2-113/85) af Fontaine for udvalget om retlige anliggender og borgernes rettigheder om harmonisering af myndighedsalderen og den juridiske handleevne, der tillægges de unge i Fællesskabet.
In the case of a 20-year-old Belgian who goes to Luxembourg, the position is reversed and he too will find himself having to overcome all kinds of legal and administrative obstacles.
Men hvis en ung belgier på tyve år tager til Luxembourg, er situationen den omvendte, hvilket medfører juridiske og administrative forhindringer af forskellig art.
It was the wish of our Assembly that something worthwhile should be done for young Europeans to mark this special year. Some measures were adopted in Luxembourg last July.
Endnu et eksempel: i Spanien kan både piger og drenge gifte sig med forældrenes samtykke, hvis de er fyldt fjorten.
To give a further example, in Spain both boys and girls can marry at 14 provided they have their parents' con sent.
For danskere og luxembourgere er mindstealderen femten år. Og de skal være seksten, hvis de er irere, portugisere eller englændere, og atten hvis de er grækere.
If they were Danes or Luxembourgers, 15 would be the minimum age limit.
I Frankrig og Belgien ligger denne alder på femten år for piger, men atten år for drenge.
In France and Belgium the minimum age is 15 for girls but 18 for boys.
I Tyskland kan den ene af de vordende ægtefæller være femten, forudsat at den anden er atten.
In the German Federal Republic one of the two spouses may be 15 provided the other is 18.
Fontaine (PPE), ordfører. — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, det internationale ungdomsår er næsten til ende. Parlamentet har ønsket at markere det med et betyndningsfuldt fremstød for ungdommen i Europa.
The question I would put to you then, ladies and gentlemen, is this: Are some people, solely by virtue of their nationality, better fitted or less well-fitted than others to take on the responsibility of marriage and the contractual commitments that flow therefrom?
I juli i år vedtog man række foranstaltninger i Luxembourg.
Can such differences in the lower age limit be justified?
Jeg spørger Dem derfor, kære kolleger: Er nogle alene som følge af deres nationalitet mere tidligt på den end andre eller mindre modne til at kunne tage an svaret for et ægteskab og de dermed følgende forpligtelser?
Mrs Van Hemeldonck found that when young people within the Community wanted to work in a Member State other than that of which they were citizens, they found themselves up against various difficulties arising from the differences in national legislation relating to them.
Er sådanne forskelle i aldersgrænserne berettigede? Selvfølgelig ikke.
The Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights felt therefore that the first thing that needed to be done was to bring about uniformity in this matter.
Derimod hæmmer de i følelig grad de unge menneskers frie bevægelighed inden for Fællesskabet.
All that is needed is a simple measure which would nevertheless constitute the essential prerequisite for forging a consistent and unified charter for young people within the Community.
Et sidste eksempel : når unge og voksne her i vinhøsttiden tager til Beaujolais for som sæsonarbejdere at deltage i vinhøsten, kan der vente en tyveårig fransk mand, græker eller tysker den ubehagelige overraskelse, at lønnen nedsættes med 20% i forhold til en vok sens løn, og det til trods for at den unge franskmand har været myndig i to år.
The report before you is the first attempt to blaze a trail towards a charter of this kind and concentrates mainly on access to work for young people and on all the related measures calculated to achieve this objective.
Derfor har udvalget om retlige anliggender og borgernes rettigheder ment, at men i første omgang bør arbejde på endelig gennemførelse af en harmonisering på dette punkt.
One last example: this is the time of year when young and old converge on the vineyards of Beaujolais to find seasonal employment picking grapes.
Tilsyneladende drejer det sig om en enkel for anstaltning, men den er en uomgængelig forudsætning for opnåelse af en kohærent mere ensartet status for de unge inden for Fællesskabet.
An English, Greek or German 20-year-old may get a very unpleasant surprise when he finds that his wage is 20% less than that of an adult worker.
Den forelagte be tænkning afstikker de første retningslinjer for en så dan status ud fra hovedsynsvinklen unges adgang til beskæftigelse og foranstaltninger til fremme deraf.
The young Frenchman, however, will already be two years into his majority at
Det arbejde, der skal udføres, kræver hverken uddannelse, erfaring eller særlige fysiske kræfter, der kunne berettige til en forskelsbehandling.
The work done by these young people requires neither training, experience nor particular physical strength to justify such inequality.
Der findes imidlertid en lov, der tillader lavere aflønning.
The employer is perfectly within his rights in making a deduction in his wages on the pretext that he is not yet
Arbejdsgiveren kan foretage denne nedsættelse af lønnen med den begrundelse, at den pågældende endnu ikke er fyldt 21 år.
21 years of age.
Faktisk nytter det ikke noget i fællesskab at fastsætte myndighedsalderen til atten år, dersom de rettigheder og pligter, der knytter sig til at være myndig, varierer mærkbart fra den ene medlemsstat til den anden, eller dersom det at blive myndig ledsages af uberettigede begrænsninger, som det undertiden fremdeles er tilfældet.
There is no point in all Member States jointly fixing the age of civil majority at 18 if the rights and duties attached to majority differ appreciably from one Member State to another or if the attainment of majority is hedged about by all manner of unjustified restrictions, as is sometimes still the case.
Når et ungt menneske bliver myndigt, skal det være fuldt myndigt, og man må ikke med den ene hånd holde fast i den ansvarlighedsstatus, man giver med den anden.
When a young person attains his majority, he should be in a position to enjoy it fully; the responsibility given to him with one hand should not be taken away with the other.
For at være så konkret som muligt, kære kolleger, vil jeg gerne have lov til at give Dem tre eksempler blandt mange andre, der kunne bruges til belysning af vore bestræbelser.
In order to be as clear as possible about all this, ladies and gentlemen, let me give you very briefly three examples out of the many that could be given to illustrate what we have been trying to do.
Siden Fællesskabets oprettelse er toldskrankerne fjernet, handelen er blevet friere, og forskelsbehandling på grundlag af køn og nationalitet er heldigvis forbudt, selv om der endnu mangler meget med hensyn til gennemførelsen.
Since the Community was set up, customs barriers have been broken down, trade has been opened up and various kinds of discrimination based on sex or nationality have happily been proscribed, even if in the latter area much remains to be done by way of implementation.
For ungdommen derimod er de nationale lov givninger alt for forskelligartede, alt for tillukkede og undertiden diskriminerende.
As far as young people are concerned, however, nationl legislations continue to be too divergent, too compartmentalized and sometimes actually discriminatory.
For at kunne gøre det har vi selvfølgelig måttet finde et juridisk
The wide-ranging but cohesive spread of propo-
Fontaine grundlag, og det viste sig, at traktaterne var tilstrækkelige i så henseende, helt bortset fra det ubestridte grundlag vi har i artikel 235.
In setting about this, we are naturally concerned that whatever is done should be founded on a proper legal base, and it seems to us that the Treaties are solid in their support, independently altogether of the incontestable legal base afforded by Article 235.
På disse områder drejer det sig om at lette en klar information af de unge og de arbejdsgivere, der kan forventes at give dem beskæftigelse, at fremme de unges frie bevægelighed inden for samtlige medlems stater og at undgå den nuværende usikkerhed med hensyn til den retlige gyldighed af de kontraktlige for pligtelser, som de unge kommer ud for, når retten til at kontrahere er underkastet en aldersgrænse, der kan variere mellem den medlemsstat, hvori den unge er hjemmehørende, værtslandet og returlandet.
who must be guided safely through the transition from the minor's dependence on his parents to the personal independence of the young person who has attained his majority. The proposed harmonization would centre around certain aspects of the work or business affairs of young people: definition of the kinds of work from which young people are barred, their capacity to conclude a contract of employment, conditions of work and holidays, salaries, freedom to dispose of work earnings, medical protection, the ability to marry with the consent of the parents.