natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg vil gerne anmode Dem om at besvare disse to spørgsmål.
It is not sufficiently clear whether it is to be debated or postponed.
Er det hensigtmæssigt at drøfte den samme ting to gange?
Is it sensible to discuss the same thing twice?
Formanden. — Denne betænkning er indgivet og vedtaget, og vi må derfor behandle den.
President. — Since this request has been entered on the agenda, we must discuss it.
Med hensyn til hr. Dankerts betænkning om det græske bidrag, som er en ny betænkning, er det normalt, at den blev opført som sidste punkt tirsdag i tilslutning til de øvrige budgetspørgsmål.
I have a further query: it appears from the minutes submitted to you and to the chairmen of the political groups that Mr Danken's repon is to be debated immediately after Mr Nord's repon (No 310); however, I believe we have already debated Mr Danken's repon in plenary sitting.
Forth. — (EN) Fru formand, jeg mener, jeg hørte Dem sige, at situationen i Polen ville stå først på dagsordenen i forbindelse med de uopsættelige forhandlinger torsdag aften.
Mr Forth. — Madam President, I thought I heard you say that the issue of Poland would be first on the
Formanden. — Dagsordenen er aldrig endelig, idet det er Parlamentet selv, der træffer afgørelse om den, efter vi har opstillet en liste.
President. — The report on the carriage of goods by road has indeed been withdrawn, not having been adopted in committee.
(') Parlamentets sammensætning — Bevillinger — Andragender — Tilladelse til at udarbejde beuenkning og udpegning af medvirkende rådgivende udvalg — Henvisning til udvalg — Beslutningsforslag i artikel 49-registret — Dokumenter — Tekster til aftaler: Se protokollen.
Membership of Parliament — Transfers of appropriations — Petitions — Authorization of reports — Referral to committee — Referral to committee (Rule 49(6)) — Motions for resolutions entered in the register pursuant to Rule 49 — Documents received — Texts of treaties forwarded by the Council, see Minutes.
Forestiller man sig, det nye svar vil blive anderledes end det gamle?
other items on the agenda.
Hvordan kan vi dog drøfte en ting to gange i løbet af to måneder, når tiden er så kort?
I believe that a vote on this particular report will now be sufficient.
Ønsker De det?
I call Mr Seefeld.
Cohen. — (NL) Ja, jeg vil foreslå, at vi trækker den mundtlige forespørgsel tilbage, da der her siges at være tale om en misforståelse.
When you read the agenda I understood you to say that an oral question with debate would be added on Wednesday but I think you quoted the wrong document number.
Vi behandlede allerede dette spørgsmål i sidste måned.
Two documents have been distributed: one relates to the oral question by myself, Mr Enright, Mrs Focke and a number of other Members which was already debated at the last part-session.
Formanden. — Når et korresponderende udvalg har vedtaget en betænkning, er det udvidede præsidium forpligtet til at sætte den på dagsordenen, og hvis visse af vore kolleger er af den opfattelse, at det udvidede præsidium til tider overskrider sine beføjelser, så ville de her få et yderligere argument, hvis det ikke opførte en betænkning på dagsordenen, som på normal vis var blevet vedtaget i et udvalg.
Then there is a second oral question with debate by Mr Poniatowski, Mr Bersani, myself and Members of the Committee on Development and Cooperation which should in fact be added to the agenda. We wanted this matter to be taken on Wednesday in conjunction with the other reports relating to development policy.
Formanden. — Der må faktisk have været tale om en misforståelse, da der er blevet indgivet en særlig anmodning i forbindelse med dette spørgsmål.
Mr Seefeld. — (DE) Madam President, for the sake of clarity I wish to confirm to the House that your observation is perfectly correct.
med denne tilbagetrækning, hr.
We have taken this action in protest against the lack of an overall concept for a European transport policy and we hope that our colleagues in the House will give us their support.
Er De tilfreds Fergusson?
President. — I call Mr Fergusson.
Fergusson. — (EN) Hvis den er trukket tilbage, er det i orden.
Is it suggested that the answer then was unsatisfactory?
Vi kan stemme, hvis De ønsker det, men forhandlingen er overstået, og vi har fået svaret.
Is the new answer going to be different from the old one?
Hvis det er klart, er jeg tilfreds, fru formand.
How can we possibly debate something twice over within two months, when time is so short?
Formanden. — Vi kommer nu til spørgsmålet om beslutningsforslag om Parlamentets udvalg.
I think that we need a much better explanation than the fact that it has been tabled.
Cohen. — (NL) Fru formand, jeg er Dem meget taknemlig, at min betænkning om levering af fødevarehjælp på 40 millioner regningsenheder til de fattigste lande er blevet opført på dagsordenen.
President. — Two items have been added to the agenda: first, your report on special aid in favour of the least advanced countries, on which the Council has requested urgent procedure and which has already been the subject of a debate, but on which no vote has taken place; if it is to be able to take place the report must be re-entered on the agenda.
Jeg tror, at også Rådet er meget taknemlig derover, idet det er på dets anmodning, opførelsen er sket.
Furthermore the Committee on Development and Cooperation has requested the inclusion in the debate of an oral ques tion to the Commission on the outcome of the Cancun Conference.
Jeg vil blot gøre Dem opmærksom på, at det ikke er nødvendigt med en debat om dette spørgsmål, idet denne allerede fandt sted i sidste måned.
It was originally planned to include this question in the debate on the Clément report.
Det eneste, det drejer sig om nu, er, at betænkningen kommer til afstemning.
Since it is foreign to the issues raised in the repon, it is added to the agenda, no change being made to the allocation of speaking time.
Jeg ville meddele Dem dette, for at give Dem mere tid til behandling af de andre punkter på dagsordenen.
If you withdrew the question, matters would obviously be simplified.
Jeg mener, at vi kan nøjes med en afstemning om dette forslag.
Is this what you want?
Men da det drejer sig om en ændring af dagsordenen, skal jeg lade det gå til afstemning, idet jeg skal understrege, at vi ikke kan udtale os om hr. Prags forslag, idet han ønsker, at dette punkt behandles onsdag formiddag.
If some of our colleagues sometimes feel that the enlarged Bureau is exceeding its powers, they would be confirmed in their belief if it did not place on the agenda a report properly adopted by a committee.
Der er dog et andet punkt, fru formand, som har forvirret mig lidt.
President. — There must indeed be some mistake since we received an express request in this connection. tion.
Det var vor hensigt at få dette spørgsmål til behandling onsdag sammen med de andre spørgsmål med tilknytning til udviklingsområdet.
Mr Fergusson, would you be satisfied with with drawal?
Bangemann. — (DE) Jeg tror, at hr. Prag vil være indforstået med, at vi stemmer om dette forslag onsdag eftermiddag, når de normale afstemninger finder sted. Han er jo, som jeg ved, meget interesseret i, at dette forslag får opbakning fra det størst mulige antal medlemmer af Parlamentet.
Mr Cohen. — (NL) Madam President, I am delighted that my repon on the 40 million units of account to cover food aid deliveries to the poorest countries has been added to the agenda.
Formanden. — Hr. Prag, kan De tilslutte Dem, at afstemningen findet sted onsdag eftermiddag sammen med de andre afstemninger?
I wanted simply to draw your attention to the fact that we need not hold a further debate on this document since it was already discussed at our last part-session.
Prag. — (EN) Ja, fru formand, jeg kan tilslutte mig.
It only remains for a vote to be taken on the report.
Jeg mener, at dette spørgsmål er af overordentlig stor betydning, og jeg er glad over, at det vil blive behandlet på et tidspunkt, hvor mange vil være til stede i Parlamentet.
I wanted to make this point to enable you to allow a little more time for the consideration of
Formanden. — To punkter er tilføjet dagsordenen.
Mr Fergusson. — If it has been withdrawn, that is fine.
For at denne afstemning kan finde sted, må betænkningen genopføres på dagsordenen.
We may have a vote if you like, but we have had the discussion and we have had the answer.
sende til Walesa, til de polske arbejdere, til de polske kvinder.
Mr Pannella. — (FR) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, I believe that extremely grave events are taking place in Poland.
Thi i modsat fald, kære venner og kolleger, udsteder vi en blanko-check til denne regering, som, uden trussel om invasion, allerede handler voldeligt.
We are afraid that a point of no return may be reached in the next few days.
Arndt. — (DE) Fru formand, jeg vil godt gøre opmærksom på, at jeg ikke vil være i stand til at stemme om et dokument, som ikke har været Parlamentets medlemmer i hænde senest 24 timer før i oversat stand.
I have received from Mr Prag and others a motion for a resolution to have a debate on the committees inserted on Wednesday morning at the beginning of the sitting.
Jeg anmoder om, at man netop i forbindelse med dette spørgsmål tager hensyn hertil.
In addition the chairmen of the political groups are considering tabling a motion for a resolution on the same question, that is to say on the number of parliamentary committees.
Jeg kræver derfor, fru formand, at vort Parlament påtager sig sit ansvar i form af en debat i dag om dette emne.
It would therefore be a good idea to take these two motions for resolutions jointly.
Formanden. — Naturligvis, hr. Arndt, vi vil anvende forretningsordenen.
But since this means amending the agenda, I must put it to the vote, it being understood that for the moment we can only vote on the proposal by Mr Prag, who would like this item to be taken on Wednesday morning.
(Det vedtoges, at afstemningen om forslag til beslutning af Prag ville finde sted i afstemningstiden onsdag, og at eventuelle andre beslutningsforslag om samme emne også ville blive sat under afstemning på dette tidspunkt)
I think that we would be doing ourselves an injustice if we failed to recognize right now that something extremely serious has happened and is liable to go on happening in the hours to come.
Prag. — (EN) Fru formand, jeg ønsker afklaring af en oplysning.
I think that we should answer the hopes of those men and women who are already victims and may suffer even more severely.
Jeg tilsluttede mig, at vi skulle stemme om mit beslutningsforslag onsdag eftermiddag.
Could we not then find 70 or perhaps even 35 minutes to say something more than the few sentences which you spoke just now in your capacity as President?
Kan jeg gå ud fra, at der, som anmodet om i mit forslag, vil blive afholdt en drøftelse af dette spørgsmål kl. 9 onsdag formiddag? Var det det, der blev besluttet?
I hope you will recognize the fact that at the meeting of political group chairmen I did not agree with the principle adopted and did not agree fully either with the content of the decision.
Det er et forretningsordensspørgsmål — enhver kan inden for rammerne af forretningsordenen udtale sig herom i et eller halvandet minut.
President. — Mr Prag, do you agree to the vote being taken on Wednesday afternoon with the other votes?
Pannella. — (FR) Fru formand, kære kolleger, jeg tror, at det der er i færd med at udvikle sig i Polen er overordentligt alvorligt.
Having said that, I believe that a spectre is haunting Europe and it is not just the spectre which you your self quite rightly evoked.
Vi må frygte, fru formand, at situationen i de kommende dage når et punkt, hvor der ingen vej er tilbage.
It is not merely a spectre of invasion but that of the quisling, the risk that men in positions of power, taking as their pretext a foreign threat, will themselves become alienated from democracy and alienated from the freedom of their peoples.
Formanden. — Efter min opfattelse må forslaget opføres.
Mr Prag. — Yes, Madam President, I am in agree ment.
Det står så grupperne frit, om de vil anvende en del af deres taletid på dette spørgsmål.
I think this matter is of very great importance and I am glad that it will be dealt with at a time when there will be a good attendance in this House.
Forsamlingen har vedtaget beslutningen, og derfor må og skal der finde en forhandling sted kl. 9.
I think we should convey this message as a matter of urgency to Walesa and to the workers and women of Poland.
Jeg tror, fru formand, at vi bør reagere på håbet hos de mænd og kvinder, som allerede er blevet ofre, og som risikerer at blive det i endnu højere grad.
Mr Arndt. — (DE) Madam President, I should like you to note that I shall not be prepared to vote on a document which has not been submitted to Members of the House 24 hours in advance in translation.
Kan vi derfor ikke afse 70 eller måske 35 minutter til at sige lidt mere, end De, fru formand, i Deres egenskab af formand kunne give udtryk for i et par sætninger for et øjeblik siden?
I would ask you to note that in connection with this particular item.
Formanden. — Vi kan ikke modsætte os denne forhandling, som altså vil finde sted om formiddagen, medens afstemningen fortsat vil være fastsat til om eftermiddagen.
President. — Certainly we shall apply the Rules of Procedure, Mr Arndt.
Når dette er sagt, tror jeg, at et spøgelse går gennem Europa, som ikke blot er det spøgelse, De med rette omtalte.
Madam President, I therefore hope that this Parliament will shoulder its responsibilities and hold a debate on this matter today.
Bangemann. — (DE) Fru formand, jeg er helt indforstået med forhandlingen.
Mr Prag. — Madam President, I wish to speak on a point of information.
Det er helt i orden, hvis det skal foregå på den måde.
I agreed that we should vote on my motion on Wednesday afternoon.
Det ville jeg blot understrege endnu en gang for at skabe klarhed.
Was that the decision actually taken?
(Anmodningen om afholdelse af en forhandling samme dag om situationen i Polen forkastedes)
colleagues are concerned, I want to make it quite clear that when you put the matter to the vote just now I was in favour of Mr Prag's motion — and possibly also another motion by the group chairmen — being put to the vote on Wednesday afternoon.
Galland. — (FR) Fru formand, jeg vil blot helt klart sige for mit vedkommende — men jeg tror at det er tilfældet for mange af mine kolleger — at da De lod stemme for et øjeblik siden, da stemte jeg om, hvor vidt beslutningsforslaget af hr. Prag — og eventuelt andre forslag til beslutning fra gruppeformændene — skulle bringes til afstemning onsdag eftermiddag.
Mr Bangemann. — (DE) Madam President, since this is a procedural matter, we can arrange our discussions in such a way as to allow each Member to make a brief statement on the item before it is put to the vote.
Jeg stemte ikke om, hvorvidt det skulle gøres til genstand for en forhandling.
That will not take a great deal of time, otherwise we should be involved in an excessively long debate.
Jeg forstår fuldt ud hr. Prags ønske, men så må vi have endnu en afstemning, som på demokratisk vis kan give os lejlighed til at sige, om vi ud over afstemningen ønsker en forhandling.
It is a procedural point and each Member can speak on it pursuant to the terms of the Rules of Procedure for one minute or 90 seconds.
Formanden. — Hr. Galland, jeg troede faktisk, at der blot skulle være en afstemning.
President. — Mr Galland, I thought, it is true, that there was simply going to be a vote.
Men da hr. Prag ønsker en forhandling, vil det være logisk at placere den om formiddagen og tage afstemningen om efter middagen.
But since Mr Prag is asking for a debate, it seems logical that this be scheduled for the morning and the vote for the after noon.
Hr. Pannella har ordet.
President. — I call Mr Pannella.
Adam. — (EN) Fordelingen af taletiden tirsdag, fru formand, de i alt 20 minutter, som er tildelt ordførerne i budgetdebatten, er efter min opfattelse virkelig helt utilstrækkelige.
President. — In my opinion it should go onto the agenda.
Jeg vil foreslå, at dette punkt sættes til 40 minutter, og at 20 minutter skal tages fra resten af den tildelte taletid i forhold hertil.
The groups are free to devote some of their speaking time to this question.
Pannella. — (FR) Fru formand, jeg troede, at vi med afstemningen om Prag-spørgsmålet havde afsluttet dette punkt og var gået videre til det følgende punkt, som var min anmodning om ændring af dagsordenen.
Mr Pannella. — (FR) I thought I had understood that when we voted on the Prag resolution we had concluded that item and passed on to the next point which was my own request for a change in the agenda.
Fru formand, jeg ved, at Deres opgave er vanskelig, da vi er meget lidt disciplinerede,
Madam President, I know that your task is difficult because we are not particularly disciplined.
(Den foreslåede fordeling aftaletiden vedtoges) (') (
Mr Forth. — Yes, this is the point, Madam President.
(Munterhed)
President. — Mr
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er meddelelse fra Kommissionen om dens reaktion på Parlamentets udtalelser og beslutninger (J).
President. — We cannot object to this debate, which will thus be held in the morning, the vote remaining scheduled for the afternoon.
Formanden. — Hr. Pannella, hr. Prag rakte hånden i vejret, netop som De havde formuleret Deres anmod ning, og jeg troede derfor han ville udtale sig om dette spørgsmål, og jeg kunne ikke afbryde ham.
hand just after you made your request, I thought he wanted to state his position on the subject and I could not interrupt him.
Dermed var talen bragt tilbage på spørgsmålet om udvalgene.
We then found ourselves back to the committees question.
Men vi vender tilbage til Deres anmod ning om en hasteforhandling om situationen i Polen.
But we now return to your request for an immediate debate on the situation in Poland.
Glinne. — (FR) I nogle dage har vi nu time for time med ængstelse og dyb sympati for det polske folk fulgt de begivenheder, der afspiller sig i Polen.
Mr Glinne. — (FR) We have been following events in Poland for some days now, from hour to hour, with anxiety and deep sympathy for the Polish people.
Vi har fulgt begivenhederne i lang tid: det viser de beslutninger, der allerede er vedtaget af Europa-Parlamentet.
We have been following these events for a very long time as you can see from the resolutions which have already been adopted by the European Parliament.
Men i denne uge vil vi få lejlighed til — på onsdag med erklæringen fra Det europæiske Råd efter mødet i Det europæiske Råd i London, torsdag eftermiddag med den fælles drøftelse om erklæringerne fra Det europæiske Råd og Rådet om det poli tiske samarbejde — at komme ind på det polske
But on Wednesday of this week with the statement by the European Council following the meeting of that Council in London and on Thursday afternoon, with the joint debate on the statements by the European Council and the Council of the Community on Political Cooperation, we shall have an opportunity to deal with the Polish question in depth and with the necessary preparation.
(') Se protokollen. (') Indgivelse af ændringsforslag: se protokollen. (·) Se bilag.
I think therefore that Mr Pannella is insisting on his own proposal to attract publicity rather than from a desire to help.
Domstolen den 4. januar, og at Kommissionen vil deltage og give udtryk for sit standpunkt.
(Parliament rejected the request for a debate on the situa­tion in Poland to be held that day).
Gendebien. — (FR) Vort Parlament har på et tidligere tidspunkt vedtaget en moderat og konstruktiv beslutning om problemet omkring kernekraftværker.
(The President read out the proposed allocation of Speaking Time)'
Nu vil jeg godt spørge Kommissionen, hvorvidt den, i lyset af de drøftelser, der må have fundet sted i London, og som finder sted i Rådet i dag, vil presse på for at få et separat svar på disse spørgsmål omkring det interne marked, eller om vi måske skal vente de mange måneder, som det kan tage at finde en løsning på mælkeproblemerne og en løsning på budgetproblemerne?
Could I now ask the Commission whether in view of the discussions that must have taken place in London and are taking place in the Council today, the Commission is going to press for a separate answer to these questions relating to the internal market, or will we have to wait perhaps the many months that it may take for a solution to the problems of milk and a solution to the problems of the budget?
Kan man forsikre os om, at Kommissionen gør sit yderste for at få en afgørelse på disse meget vigtige spørgsmål med tilknytning til det interne marked, konkrete spørgsmål, der berører os alle, og hvor vi har et ansvar, og hvor den nuvæ rende mangel på fremskridt reducerer alle Fællesskabets institutioner, indbefattet vor egen, til absurditeter. teter.
Can we have some assurance that the Commission is doing its very best to get a decision on these vital questions that relate to the internal market, a real issue that is in front of us all, where we have responsibilities and where the present lack of progress is making a nonsense of all the institutions of the Community, including our own?
Problemet er både aktuelt og presserende, og vi er derfor overraskede over Kommissionens manglende svar.
Mr Adam. — Speaking time allocated on Tuesday, Madam President — the amount that is allocated to the draftsmen in the budget debate, of 20 minutes in total, I think is really quite insufficient.
Fru formand, kære kolleger, det ville også glæde mig, hvis Kommissionen kunne meddele os sine præcise intentioner på området, samt hvilken tidsplan, der vil blive tale om, således at vi kan komme i gang hurtigst muligt.
We have got to a stage where the draftsmen from the various commit­tees now have very difficult choices to make and prior­ities to indicate to the Parliament and to try and squeeze all that into 20 minutes speaking time in total, I think, is really inadequate.
Narjes, medlem af Kommissionen. — (DE) Fru formand, jeg kan på Kommissionens vegne give det ærede medlem enhver ønsket forsikring.
Mr Narjes, Member of the Commission. — (DE) Madam President, on behalf of the Commission I can give the honourable Member any assurance which he wishes to have.
Vi beklager som han forsinkelsen af de stærkt nødvendige afgørelser.
We share his regret at the delay in taking these urgently necessary decisions.
Kommissionsformanden vil på udenrigsministermøderne i dag og i morgen forsøge at udskille den såkaldte Volet I fra de to andre.
The President of the Commission will be attempting at the meetings of the Foreign Ministers today and tomorrow to obtain the separation of the first set of issues or 'Volet Γ as it is known, from the two others.
Om det lykkes afhænger af de andre medlemsstaters holdning.
Whether or not he succeeds in this will depend on the attitude of the other Member States.
Narjes, medlem af Kommissionen. — (DE) Fru formand, efter den franske regerings meddelelse om, at den ville tage alle kernereaktor-programmer op til overvejelse, besluttede Kommissionen først at afvente den videre udvikling i Frankrig. I pressen har vi siden kunnet erfare, at det kraftværk, som medlemmet tænker på, nu alligevel skal bygges.
President. — We have followed the usual rule which, it seems to me, should not be amended, unless it be to limit still further group speaking time, which would seem to be very difficult.
Kommissionen er dog på nuværende tidspunkt ikke i stand til at give det ærede medlem mere håb, end det var berettiget for et par måneder siden.
President. — The next item is the communication from the Commission on action taken on the opinions and resolutions of Parliament.3
Patterson. — (EN) Fru formand, mit spørgsmål har også tilknytning til det længere dokument, helt nøjagtigt side 62 deri. I juni vedtog vi en beslutning, som jeg var ordfører for, om andragende nr. 41/79 om det franske insemineringsmonopols uforenelighed med Rom-traktaten.
Mr Patterson. — Madam President, my question also refers to the longer document, and specifically to page 62 of it.