natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Man må konstatere, at kvinderne bestemt ikke er herre over en beslutsom udviklingspolitik eller fredens be­varelse.
It has consistently shown its sup port for further Community measures in the interests of women. It is now well placed to underline the limitations of such measures.
De store beslutninger vedrørende ligevægten i verden træffes i instanser, hvori kvinderne nærmest er fravårende eller i bedste fald underrepræsenteret.
It can be difficult to apply binding texts when what they ultimately require is changes in attitudes and the elimination of sexist stereotypes.
Krisen gør det selvfølgelig endnu vanskeligere som følge af mangel på tilstrækkelige bevillinger og en reel manøvremargen ved fastsættelsen af den økonomiske politik at gennemføre særlige aktioner for kvinderne.
Let me take just one example: whereas they are, if anything, more successful at school, the vast majority of girls are offered a selection of only about thirty jobs in vocational guidance, whereas the corresponding figure for boys is almost 300.
Men forbedring af kvindens rettigheder er fremfor alt et politisk problem.
Parents and teachers are not always aware how important it is for a girl to have a sound career plan geared to the modern world.
Forbedringen kan kun ske, hvis der klart udtrykkes politisk vilje dertil.
Member States themselves have in some cases been late to apply these directives, or have not met all their requirements.
Det er under pres fra kvin­dernes krav, at regeringerne er begyndt at medtage princippet om lige muligheder for mænd og kvinder i deres prioriteteringer.
The Commission is under a duty to carry out its monitoring function with firmness.
Nu skal vi passe på, at der ikke pludselig gøres tilba­geskridt.
Agreement has not been reached on a single new binding text since 1979.
Formanden. — Da vi nu er nået til afstemningstiden, skal jeg afbryde forhandlingen.
Nairobi has been a timely reminder of the need for a dynamic longterm approach to the problems of equality.
Den vil blive genop­taget kl. 15.00.
Women are determined to take action to
Sälzer (PPE). — (DE) Fru formand, det europæiske folkespartis gruppe bliver nødt til at forkaste det nu således ændrede forslag af hr. Ford om Eureka, fordi denne betænkning nu ikke mere er en Eureka­be­tænkning, men igen til dels overtager de SDI­punkter, som allerede blev forkastet i udvalget.
Pursuit of these strategies involves continuation of traditional forms of action, but at the same time it will require the introduction of more innovative policies following on from the three themes of the United Nations Decade for Women: equality, development and peace.
Efter vedtagelsen af ændringsforslag nr. 22
These are areas in which we have done a great deal of work.
De Courcy Ling (ED. — (EN) Fru formand, til forret­ningsordenen. Af tekniske grunde kunne jeg ikke be­
We must make further progress through the adoption of new texts and better utilization of community funds.
Van Der Lek (ARC). — (NL) Fru formand, vi mener ikke, at verdens problemer kan løses gennem indu­striel konkurrence. Bestemt ikke, når det udelukken­de drejer sig om high technology.
The image of women in the public perception is still very stereotyped, and this tends to perpetuate their isolation in the status of complementary but lesser beings.
Denne betænkning ville have haft en mening, hvis den klart havde givet udtryk for, at europæisk deltagelse i SDI må afvises.
It serves no purpose to create new rights if they are going to be ignored.
En sådan deltagelse tjener intet som helst menne­
Given the essential role that women play in Third World economies, they cannot be left out of
Vi vil derfor stemme for, idet vi samtidig beklager, at det initiativ, den italienske regering tog vedrørende Iris-projektet, ikke er blevet fulgt op — om det så skyldes den italienske regering eller at fællesskabsinstitutionerne har vendt det døve øre til, ved jeg ikke.
account in policies on development and cooperation. The third Lomé Convention, in Article 123, and the Arusha Conference testify to the resolve of the Euro­pean Community to ensure that women are more closely involved in the planning and organization of development projects.
Den i tankerne anlagte sag, ideologien på kort sigt sejrede desværre over den bydende nødvendighed af at tage de udfordringer op, som Europa står overfor.
I must make it quite clear that if anybody's machine does not work, they should kindly tell me before the results of the vote are announced.
Det beklager vi.
After the adoption of recital Β
Endelig er det i betragtning af de teknologiske bivirkninger, som er væsentlige for de europæiske virksomheder, dvs. for beskæftigelsen i Fællesskabet, ikke rimeligt at henstille til de europæiske virksomheder, som alligevel gør det, på forhånd at give afkald på fra sag til sag at deltage i de amerikanske forskningsprojekter. jekter.
Mr Baillot (COM). — (FR) Madam President, I find that the House is really being very inconsistent since, in adopting Amendment No 22, we have approved the exact opposite of recital B, and I therefore really fail to see how this House can continue debating!
Den udfordring, vi skal tage op, er både global og mangeartet.
The SDI is condemned in one place and referred to in another.
Det er Fællesskabet, som skal kæmpe på alle fronter i den økonomiske krig: teknologi, forsk ning, konkurrenceevne og selvfølgelig beskæftigelse.
I think this was something that needed to be pointed out before the discussion and voting contin­ued.
Christiansen (S). — Fru formand, vi danske socialdemokrater kan acceptere alt i den foreliggende beslutning om Eureka.
We heard it said in Nairobi that armed conflict, ter­rorism and the arms race were among the main ob­stacles to development and the achievement of equal­ity.
Vi finder det især vigtigt, at det understreges, at Eureka er og skal være et civilt projekt, og at Eureka ikke endnu er en tilstrækkelig effektiv løsning til mindskelse af den teknologiske kløft mellem Europa, Japan og USA.
There is no gainsaying that women have no con­trol over policy­making on development or the preser­vation of peace.
Den slappe holdning, medlemslandene har udvist over for Eureka rent økonomisk — det gælder også den danske regering — må stærkt kritiseres.
The important decisions concerning balance in the world are taken by bodies in which vir­tually no women are to be found or, at best, they are under­represented.
Vi finder det også rigtigt og godt, at det fremhæves, at europæisk deltagelse i SDI-projek-tet ikke kan retfærdiggøres forsknings- og videnskabspolitisk, og at europæisk deltagelse i SDI afvises. Men jeg synes ikke, det er nok.
Themes and arguments of which we thought we had heard the last are beginning to come back to the surface; they represent a threat to our freedoms in general, and to the especially vulner­able freedoms of women in particular, and constant vigilance is essential.
SDI må først og fremmest også forkastes, fordi det er et rent militært forskning sprojekt, hvilket hr. Gardner, direktøren for SDI, selv fremhævende for nylig på et møde i energiudvalget.
It was the pressure of campaign­ing by women that induced governments to begin to incorporate the principle of equal opportunities between men and women into their priorities.
Med denne tilføjelse vil vi stemme for den foreliggende beslutning.
President. — That is the way Parliament has voted and that is the way it remains.
Set fra dette synspunkt er der en kontinuitet mellem det standpunkt, vi ind tog i går, og det vi indtager i dag.
President. — We must now interrupt the debate and proceed to the vote.
Metten (S). — (NL) Fru formand, Eureka er det vest europæiske svar på det amerikanske Star- Wars-program.
Mr Sälzer (PPE). — (DE) Madam President, the Group of the European People's Party will have to reject the amended motion of Mr Ford on Eureka because this report is no longer a report on Eureka, but reintroduces some of the Star Wars elements already rejected in committee.
Ikke at udtale sig om Star-Wars, således som højresiden her i Parlamentet ønsker, er at stikke hovedet i busken.
The present version of this report is, furthermore, full of contradictions, so that no one can now vote for it with a clear conscience because it contains both a positive and a negative posi­tion on Star Wars.
Uden Star- Wars havde der ikke været noget Eureka, og hvis Vesteuropa havde hilst Star-Wars velkommen, havde der ikke været behov for Eureka.
Consequently all sides of the House, irrespective of their judgment of the American defence initiative, ought really to vote against this report if they are aware of the implications of the deci­sion they are to take.
Eureka er startet af gode grunde.
After the adoption of Amendment No 22
Europa må ikke blive afhængigt af militærprogrammer fra USA.
Mr de Courcy Ling (ED). — Madam President, on a point of order.
cepterer den europæiske industris deltagelse i »stjernekrigen«. Ud fra disse betragtninger kan vi ikke støtte en sådan tekst, især da et initiativ fra Europa-Parlamentet kun har betydning, hvis det indeholder klare standpunkter.
pean cooperation on SDL Participation in that research will serve no human purpose whatsoever, and can only mean that resources will be diverted from socially useful human purposes in favour of one of the most dangerous armaments programmes ever under taken.
Men denne tilstand af forvirring, dunkelhed og uklare synspunkter medfører i sidste instans, at den europæiske industri fortsætter med at blive trukket ind i »stjernekrigen«.
We shall therefore vote in favour, at the same time deploring that an initiative taken by the Italian govern ment on the question of the IRIS project has got no further — I do not know whether this is the fault of the Italian government, or whether it is because of the deafness of the institutions of the Community.
Derfor vil parlamentsmedlemmerne fra Grækenlands kommunistiske parti ikke stemme for Ford-beslutningsforslaget. ningsforslaget.
We have therefore to rejoice that, finally, a research project is going ahead and that, in our view, it is pro ceeding along the right lines.
Turner (ED). — (EN) Fru formand, det er en tragedie for Parlamentet, at vi bliver nødt til at stemme imod Eureka på grund af, hvad der er sket.
As to Eureka, the multinationals are well able to look after their own investments themselves.
Lige i det øje blik, hvor vi gerne ville have en fast og klar tilkendegivelse fra Europa-Parlamentet til Kommissionen og til medlemsstaterne om, hvad vi skulle gøre ved Eureka, må vi desværre stemme imod på grund af, hvad der er sket.
The functions of the Community should be to protect the environment, promote democratic structures, give women a secure place in society and ensure that with all this technology, at least some of it is used to secure a few socially useful objectives.
Dette benspænd fra socialistisk og anden side, hvor man forbinder Eureka med SDI, hvad der er helt irrelevant, har ødelagt hvad der ellers kunne have været en stærkt formuleret udtalelse fra Parlamentet om Eureka.
In that respect the report falls short, in our opinion, and although the rejection of SDI has, fortunately — and I welcome this — been put back into the report in a certain sense, this has been done in such vague and unclear terms that we really do not feel able to support the report as it now stands.
Det er jeg meget ked af.
I at all events shall not do so.
Van der Lek (ARC). — (NL) Fru formand, afstemningen var så forvirret, at det nu først går op for mig, at ændringsforslag nr. 24 tilsyneladende er vedtaget, at der altså nu står, at deltagelse i SDI er uforsvarlig og ikke må finde sted.
Mr Guermeur (RDE). — (FR) Madam President, it was understood that Mr Ford's report would be con cerned exclusively with the Eureka programme, which is a programme with civil objects, as indeed is stated in its constitutive charter.
Nuvel, vi stemmer imod, men jeg kan tilføje, at jeg privat vil gøre opmærksom på de punkter i beslutningsforslaget, der vedrører Eureka, og sige, at dem går vi helt ind for.
Considering the technological spin-off in prospect, which offers substantial potential for European firms, in other words for jobs in the Community, one cannot seriously expect European firms, which are going to take any opportunity that comes their way in any event, to enter into an a priori commitment not to take part in American research projects, on a case-by-case basis.
Baillot (COM), skriftlig. - (FR) For godt et år siden foreslog den franske regering sine fællesskabspartnere Eureka-programmet.
Mr Christiansen (S). — (DA) Madam President, we Danish Social Democrats can accept everything in the report before us on Eureka.
Poniatowski (LDR). — (FR) Fru formand, jeg har netop gentagne gange hørt den bemærkning, at Eureka var det civile program og SDI det militære program. gram.
We consider it particularly important to emphasize that Eureka is and must be a civil project and that Eureka is not yet a sufficiently effective means of closing the technological gap between Europe, Japan and the USA.
Måden, det blev lanceret på, gav næring til mange fortolkninger.
The pusillanomous attitude shown by the Member States towards Eureka in purely economic terms — and I include the Danish Government in this — calls for severe criticism.
Det blev således stillet i modsætning til det amerikanske SDI, men havde samme mål, dvs. hovedsagelig militære.
We also think it right and proper to draw attention to the fact that European participation in the SDI project cannot be justified in research and science policy terms and to reject European participation in SDL But I do not think that is enough.
Jeg vil gerne endnu en gang sige, at der ikke findes noget civilt program eller noget militært program.
SDI must also be rejected first and foremost because it is a purely military research project, as Mr Gardner, SDI director, himself pointed out at a meeting of the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology.
I dag er 18 lande interessere de i Eureka, bl.a.
The challenge that we have to meet is both general and multi-faceted.
Østrig, Finland, Sverige og Schweiz, som under ingen omstændigheder vil deltage i et fore tagende, der tager sigte på militæret.
It is the Community that should be campaigning on all fronts of the economic war: tech nology, research, competitiveness and, of course, employment.
Hr. Ford havde udarbejdet en udmærket betænkning, meget fyldestgørende om Eureka. Det væsentlige punkt er også, understreger vi, at Eureka er et program om industriel koordinering blandt de europæiske lande, som skal bygge på fællesskabsforskning.
Mr Bonaccini (COM). — (IT) Mr President, my group will vote in favour of the motion for a resolution, because of the way in which it has been drafted and for the arguments it deploys; and, finally, because it takes account of all of the subject's historical development, as this has taken place in our Parliament.
Projekter vedrørende bioteknologi og forædling af landbrugsvarer giver Eureka et virkelig civilt indhold.
The Community, Madam President, does not have the right to remain on the sidelines, and it is for this reason that I shall not be voting for this report.
Det var det væsentlige, og vi ville uden tøven have stemt for denne betænkning. Den omstændighed, at man har indarbejdet ændringsforslag, som vil for dømme SDI, som er et eksternt problem i forhold til Europa og til Eureka, bevirker, at den liberale og demokratiske gruppe vil stemme mod denne betænk ning i dens ændrede form.
In the first place we are, I believe, indebted to an initiative that was taken some time back by the French Government, which in this way made clear its — shall I say — unwillingness to be associated with SDI — not to say its open opposition to the initiative — as some political parties would have wished.
Ud fra dette synspunkt er betragtning B i forslaget til beslutning yderst farligt. Hvad står der?
From this standpoint there is continuity between the positions adopted yesterday and those that we are adopting today.
Alavanos (COM). — (GR) Fru formand, der er ingen tvivl om, som andre talere også har gjort opmærksom på, at dette er en tekst, der indeholder mange selv modsigelser, især spørgsmålet om USAs strategiske forsvarsinitiativ.
Mr Metten (S). — (NL) Madam President, Eureka is the Western European answer to the American Star Wars programme.
Vi ville måske trods vor modstand mod andre dele af teksten være villige til at støtte en tekst, som indtog et klart standpunkt imod »stjernekrigen«. krigen«.
Not to hold a debate on Star Wars, which is what the right in this House wants, is to bury one's head in the sand politically.
Det mener jeg imidlertid slet ikke er indeholdt i den ne tekst, og vi har forkastet et par ændringsforslag, som går imod »stjernekrigen«, hvorimod allerede det første punkt og adskillige efterfølgende stort set ac
Without Star Wars, there would have been no Eureka, and if Western Europe had welcomed Star Wars, Eureka would not have been necessary.
Det er det svar, tolv »vismænd« gav ministerpræsident Craxi på hans forespørgsel.
Unfortunately there are a few big Member States in the Community who want to have their cake
Eureka er måske det bedste svar på vor tids teknologiske udfordring.
Madam President, Eureka is built on solid found­ations.
Som klar modstander af enhver form for deltagelse i USAs forsvarsinitiativ tror jeg, at Fællesskabet vil få mulighed for at få en selvstændig, uafhængig og fredelig plads i vor nuværende for styrrede verden.
Madam President, I therefore welcome the fact that the amendments rejecting European participation in Star Wars have been adopted.
Derfor vil vi stemme for hr. Fords betænkning.
I shall therefore vote in favour.
Det er på den anden side heller ikke sandt, at militariseringen af rummet i form af SDI eller enhver anden måde er kilden til udvikling af videnskab og teknik.
But I think this text fails to meet the bill in this respect, that we have passed a couple of amendments rejecting Star Wars while, on the other hand, the first para­graph and several others that follow effectively accept European industry's participation in Star Wars.
Maffre-Bauge (COM), skriftlig. - (FR) Selv om det er nødvendigt at koordinere forskningsbestræbelserne inden for de avancerede teknologier i Europa, og selv om det er i orden, at EF har midler til at deltage i Eureka-programmet, er det alligevel meget vigtigt igen at få bekræftet nogle grundholdninger, først og fremmest at Eureka er forpligtet til udelukkende at have civile og fredelige mål.
With this line of thinking we cannot support such a text, bearing in mind as well that an initiative by the Euro­pean Parliament carries weight only when it shows clear-cut views. This situation of confusion, obfuscation and non-clarification of views ultimately favours the continuing entrapment and involvement of Euro­pean industry in Star Wars, however.
I næsten tredive år har den fredelige erobring af rummet vist det modsatte.
Therefore we in the Communist Party of Greece will not be voting for the Ford motion for a resolution.
Projekter om fredelig erobring af rummet findes, an dre kan udarbejdes.
Mr Turner (ED). — Madam President, it is a tragedy in the European Parliament that we shall have to vote against Eureka because of what has happened.
Vi har i et ændringsforslag fremhævet, at Rom-traktaten forbyder de europæiske institutioner enhver form for deltagelse i projekter af militær art, som det helt klart er tilfældet med SDI.
Just at the very moment when we wanted firm and clear guid­ance from the European Parliament to the Commis­sion and to the Member States on what to do about Eureka, unfortunately, because of what has happened, we shall vote against.
For vort vedkommende er vi positive over for koordineringen mellem Eureka og EF, hvis Rom-traktat forbyder enhver deltagelse i militære aktiviteter.
Mr van der Lek (ARC). — (NL) Madam President, the voting was so confused that it has only now become clear to me that Amendment No 24 has in fact been adopted, so that the motion for a resolution now states that participation in SDI would be irresponsible and should not take place.
Vi støtter alt det, som allerede udføres i fællesskab (Ariane, Hermès m.m.), og alt det, som kan udføres i fremtiden med alle lande i verden, først og fremmest de socialistiske lande og udviklingslandene.
I therefore wish to amend my explanation of vote to the effect that I shall not now vote against the motion, I shall abstain.
Europa-Parlamentet har netop fordømt SDI. Det har desværre ikke gjort det så klart, som vi kunne ønske.
Mr Baillot (COM), in writing. — (FR) It is a little over a year since the French Government proposed the Eureka programme to its partners in the Community.
På den anden side er mange punkter i den tekst, der skal stemmes om, forvirrende, ja selvmodsigende, og lader muligheden for, at Eureka kommer på militære afveje, stå åben.
Mr Poniatowski (LDR). — (FR) Madam President, it has been said several times in the past few minutes that Eureka is the civil programme and the SDI the military programme.
Alt dette ville have fået os til at undlade at stemme.
The conditions under which it was launched were such that all interpretations of it were possible.
Men i denne tekst vil vi huske den kendsgerning, at ét punkt udgør Europa-Parlamentets første fordømmelse af SDI. Derfor stemmer vi for denne tekst.
This is how it came to be contrasted with the American SDI, but nevertheless with the same objectives, essentially mili­tary objectives.
Seligman (ED), skriftlig. - (EN) Efter tilføjelse af ændringsforslag nummer 24 af Linkohr er hr. Fords beslutningsforslag fuldt af modsigelser og afviser på ét sted SDI for så at acceptere det på et andet.
I want to say, as I have said before, that the distinction between civil programmes and military programmes is a false distinction.
Kolokotronis (S), skriftlig. — (GR) Jeg vil gerne i den ne stemmeforklaring understrege, at vi anser Eurekaprojektet for at være et prisværdigt og vigtigt forsøg på at udvikle den europæiske teknologi.
Hence the immediate reaction among scientists, who wanted to see the organization of projects with a purely civil content.
Muligheden for, at virksomheder fra alle de lande, som er med i Eureka-projektet, kan deltage, vil få særlig stor betydning, hvis det også lykkes industrier fra de mindre udviklede lande at deltage.
There are now 18 countries involved in Eureka, including Austria, Finland, Sweden and Switzerland, which will not want to have anything to do with an enterprise which has the remo­test military connections.
Derfor tror jeg, at Eureka har større betydning som et program for teknologisk samarbejde.
Mr Ford had produced a very good and thorough report on Eureka.
Særlig nyttige er de programmer, som styrker samarbejdet med teknologisk mindre udvikle de virksomheder, fremmer deltagelsen af små og mel lemstore virksomheder, fremmer overførsel af teknologi og styrker industriens konkurrenceevne med en opprioritering af teknologien også inden for de traditionelle industrigrene.
We therefore stress the essential point, which is that Eureka is a programme for indus­trial coordination among European countries and must be supported by Community research.
Men jeg vil gerne rejse spørgsmålet om forvaltningen af Eureka.
Mr Alavanos (COM). — (GR) Madam President, without any doubt, as other speakers have also said,
Hvis Eurekas sekretariat kommer til at ligge i Bruxelles nær ved EFs hovedkvarter, hvad jeg håber, så vil dette i vid udstrækning skyldes pression fra Europa-Parlamentet inden for det sidste år.
No doubt other fears still subsist in scientific cir­cles, since they do not want the multinationals to impose their projects and public funding of them, when the full costs should be borne by the multi­nationals themselves.
Eureka kan kun forbedre Europas konkurrencevne. hvis det bliver et forbindelsesled mellem programmer
That said, the most serious dan­ger to Eureka is clearly the possibility of its being div­erted into the military sphere.
Seligman dømmes eller frifindes, uden at denne situation skal vare ved hele livet.
Baillot medium-size undertakings, facilitate the transfer of technology and strengthen industrial competitiveness through the updating of technology in the traditional industries also.
I 1992 vil vi have gennemført det interne marked — et Europa uden grænser.
We are wholly opposed to this recital.