natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Til det ærede medlem, som stillede spørgsmålet, og også til hr. Moorhouse, som havde stillet det samme spørgsmålet, overdrager jeg en kopi af disse oplysninger til deres mere detaljerede orientering.
I am sending copies of this information to the honourable Member who put the question and also to Mr Moorhouse, who raised the same question, so that they may be fully informed.
Må jeg have lov til præcisere, at den regel, som lady Elles opstillede, gik ud på, at spørgeren ikke blev taget i betragtning, når man vurderede med det samlede antal tillægsspørgsmål.
May I just, very respectfully, point out that the ruling Lady Elles gave was that the author of the question was disregarded when considering the total number of supplementary questions.
Derfor vil det på ingen måde gå imod lady Elles' regel, hvis De giver ordet til fr. Hooper.
Therefore, it would not in any way infringe Lady Elles's ruling if you were to call Miss Hooper.
Key (S). — (EN) Jeg vil gerne bede kommissæren kommentere det, der netop blev sagt.
Former oral question.without debate (0-175/82), converted into a question for Question Time.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at tilskuddene til landingsafgifter i Stansted-lufthavn fra den engelske lufthavnsmyndighed ødelægger målene for Fællesskabets regional udviklingspolitik, for så vidt angår de tilskud, der ydes til regionale lufthavne?
Mr Galland (L). — (FR) I should like to know whether the Commissioner thinks there is the slightest chance that the French example which he has just mentioned — the thirty-nine hour week and five weeks' holiday with pay — will soon be applied in the Community.
Vil dette ikke gøre det mindre sandsynligt, at Kommissionen fremover yder tilskud til regionale lufthavne?
Would this not make it less likely for the Commis sion to make grants to regional airports in future ?
Jeg tænker her på Manchester, Leeds, Bradford og East Midlands.
I am thinking here of Manchester, Leeds, Bradford and the East Midlands.
Formanden. — Fru Kellett-Bowman, forretningsordenen tvinger mig til at opretholde en vis orden i spørgetiden og at sørge for, at der besvares så mange spørgsmål som muligt. Derfor er vi blevet enige om, at vi ikke lader det komme til en diskussion mellem medlemmer fra et bestemt land og Kommissionen om et givet punkt, og jeg følger denne regel.
President. — Mrs Kellett-Bowman, I am obliged by the Rules of Procedure to ensure a certain degree of order during Question Time and to see that as many questions as possible receive an answer.
Fællesskabet har gennem regionalfonden altid deltaget med støtte til regionale lufthavne under forudsætning af, at den nationale regering støtter disse lufthavne med statstilskud.
The Community, via the Regional Fund, has participated in support for peripheral airports, always providing that the national government has granted governmental support for those airports.
Stansted lufthavn er ikke indbefattet i disse lufthavne.
Stansted Airport is not one of them.
Lalor (DEP). — (EN) Må jeg i lyset af dette svar spørge kommissæren, om han ikke mener, når vi nu har fælleskabstilskud eller støtte gennem regional fonden eller på anden måde, at det regionalt set ville være langt mere fordelagtigt at yde bistand eller støtte med henblik på at udvikle Manchester i stedet for Stansted?
Mr Lalor (DEP). — Would the Commissioner, in the light of his reply, not agree that if we do have Community subsidization or assistance through the Regional Fund or otherwise, then any aid or assistance aimed at developing Manchester rather than Stansted would be regionally far more advantageous ?
Hopper (ED). — (EN) Er Kommissionen klar over, at der findes faste ruter mellem på den ene side Stansted og på den anden side Amsterdam, Rotterdam samt andre europæiske byer, og at disse ruter vil stige i hyppighed og antal i takt med Stansteds udvidelse?
Mr Hopper (ED). — Is the Commission aware that scheduled services exist between Stansted on the one hand and Amsterdam, Rotterdam and other continental cities on the other, and that these services will increase in frequency and number as Stansted expands ?
Er Kommissionen ligeledes klar over, at man i Belgien, Holland og andre medlemsstater er meget bekymret over tilskuddene til Stansted-lufthavnen, eftersom Stansted meget direkte vil komme til at konkurrere med hollandske, belgiske og franske lufthavne i den interkontinentale lavpristrafik?
Is the Commission also aware that there is considerable concern in Belgium and Holland and other continental Member States about subsidies to Stansted airport, since Stansted will compete with Dutch, Belgian and French airports very directly for inter-continental, low cost traffic ?
Men jeg tror, at hr. Kontogeorgis fik fat i det centrale.
However, I think Mr Contogeorgis has got the point.
Kontogeorgis (GR) — Der er ingen grund til at bekymre sig på forhånd, for som allerede sagt eksi sterer der ikke noget bevis for, at den britiske rege ring støtter Stansted lufthavn, og derfor vil der ikke blive tale om eller eventuelt blive tale om fællesskabs støtte.
Mr Contogeorgis. — (GR) This concern is premature, because, as I have already said, there is no indication that the British Government supports Stansted Airport, and consequently there is no support, nor is there likely to be any, from the Community.
Kontogeorgis (GR) — Som jeg allerede har nævnt, og som det også fremgår af British Airways Authority's dokument, som jeg har til disposition, eksi
Mr Contogeorgis. — (GR) As I have already mentioned, and as emerges from a document of the British Airport Authority in my possession, Stansted Airport receives no subsidies from the British Govern ment.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
There has not been, nor is there now, any support from the Community.
Må jeg derfor spørge, om Kommissionen agter at undersøge tilskud, der er bevilget af myndigheder i andre af Fællesskabets medlemslande.
May I therefore ask if the Commission proposes to investigate the subsidies granted by authorities in other Member States of the Community ?
Jeg tænker især på de græske myndigheder, som tilsyneladende tillader Olympic Airways at lande og starte i Athen lufthavn uden at betale nogen form for landingsafgift, i modsætning til andre uden' landske flyselskaber, der beflyver Athen, som skal betale de obligatoriske landingsafgifter, der er fastsat for denne lufthavn.
I have in mind in particular the Greek authorities, who apparently allow Olympic Airways to land and take off at Athens Airport without paying any landing charge whatsoever, while foreign airlines operating in and out of Athens have to pay the statutory landing charges fixed for that airport.
Må jeg bede om kommissærens kommentar til det generelle spørgsmål og til det specielle?
May I have the comments of the Commissioner on the general question and on the particular ?
Kontogeorgis (GR) — Som nævnt fremgår det af, dokumentet fra Department of Trade, som jeg har til disposition, at der ikke ydes afgiftstilskud til engelske lufthavne, og at afgifterne fastsættes efter handelsmæssige kriterier.
From figures that I have at my disposal it emerges that 26 400 000 passengers passed through Heathrow Airport in 1982, while only 300 000 passed through Stansted. The prevailing opinion is that the increased traffic through Stansted is at the cost of Heathrow or Gatwick, in the London area, and not of other airports.
Moreland (ED). — (EN) Idet jeg er helt enig med kommissæren i, at spørgsmålet om beskyttelse ikke burde rejses her, vil jeg gerne spørge, om han ikke er bekymret over, at der måske er tale om en for langsom reaktion fra Rådets side, fra medlemsstaternes side, når man tænker på den vedvarende strøm af udstyr fra det fjerne østen og De forenede Stater samt på den kendsgerning, at mange af vore virksomheder stadig har problemer med at overleve dette?
Mr Contogeorgis. — (GR) As I have said, from the document from the Department of Trade that I have at my disposal, it emerges that there are no subsidies of dues at British airports and that the dues are defined in terms of commercial criteria.
ESPRIT kan være godt nok — jeg vil virkelig komplimentere komrnissæren for programmets hidtidige succes på lang sigt — men der er stadig det påtrængende problem, som medlemsregeringerne må løse.
I raised a totally new question, and the point which concerns myself and my colleagues is that huge subsidies are going to Stansted and that in many cases landing fees at Stansted are one-hundredth part of landing fees at Heathrow.
Vedrørende sagen om »Olympic Airways«, som hr. Moorhouse bragte frem, har Kommissionen indtil nu ikke nogen anmeldelse eller noget bevis for, at der eksisterer denne form for støtte til Olympic Airways fra den græske regering.
Comcerning the matter of Olympic Airways raised by Mr Moorhouse, the Commission has up to now received no accusation or indication that there is any such subsidy of Olympic Airways by the Greek Government.
Når der foreligger en sådan anmeldelse, vil Kommissionen undersøge det for at konstatere, om der i realiteten eksisterer brud på artikel 92 i Rom-traktaten.
Should such an accusation be made, the Commission would investigate it to ascertain whether in fact there is any contravention of Article 92 of the Treaty of Rome.
Spørgsmål nr. 41 af
President. — Question No 41, by Mr Moreland (H-55/83) :
Dette skyldes det fælles markeds vedholdende opdeling samt den manglende fastsættelse af præcise mål. Det er kernen i problemet, og det er vigtigt ikke at afvente resultatet af de langsigtede programmer for at binde an med denne første vanskelighed.
President then the competitive capability of the truly Euro pean information technology and industry in the short term, as well as developing longterm intiatives such as the Esprit programmes ?
Vore konkurrenter udnytter det fælles bedre marked, og det er vor fejl, hvis vi ikke kan finde ud af at gøre det bedre.
Our competitors are making better use of the Community market, and it is our fault if we do not manage to do better.
Og jeg tror, at det spørgsmål, som vi bør stille os — og det vil bestemt være et af de vigtigste spørgsmål i debatten om Fællesskabets ogsving som led i det, der blev vedtaget i Stuttgart —, er at finde ud af, hvad vi hurtigst muligt bør gøre for at bevare vore udviklingsmuligheder.
I believe that the question we have to ask ourselves is what we should be doing urgently to maintain our capacity development, and this will undoubtedly be done of the most important issues in the debate on action to promote recovery by the Community in the framework of what was decided in Stuttgart.
Det er spørgsmål nr. 1.
That is the first question.
Derefter må vi skabe betingelserne for at føre det ud i livet.
Then we have to create the conditions for acting on the answer arrived at.
Det er spørgsmål nr. 2. Og med hensyn til dette spørgsmål nr. 2 må vi tage hensyn til de specielle punkter, som hr. Moreland har rejst.
That is the second question, and in dealing with it, it will be necessary to take account of the specific points raised by Mr Moreland.
Davignon, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (FR) Der er to aspekter i hr. Morelands spørgsmål.
Mr Davignon, Vice-President of the Commission.— (FR) There are two aspects to Mr Moreland's question.
Det første omhandler medlemslandenes procedurer, og her kommer vi ind på et vanskeligt spørgsmål, som i Kommissionens øjne udvikler sig alt for langsomt, dvs. spørgsmålet om harmonisering og åbning af de offentlige markeder.
The first is concerned with the Member States' procedures, and there we enter the difficult area of harmonization and opening-up of public contracts, where, in the Commission's view, progress is being made too slowly.
Men de offentlige markeder, som har med informationsteknologi at gøre, administreres ifølge det direktiv, der blev godkendt i 1977, men de faktiske fremgangsmåder er endnu genstand for diskussioner i en arbejdsgruppe under Rådet, og det er ikke meget, vi kommer ud af stedet.
Public contracts, in the case of information technology, are governed by the directive approved in 1977, but the practical arrangements are still being discussed in the Council workingparty and we are not making much progress.
Herman (PPE). — (FR) Direktivet om åbning af de offentlige markeder, navnlig inden for telekommunikationssektoren, er vedtaget, men endnu ikke gennemført, fordi de nærmere bestemmelser endnu drøftes i en arbejdsgruppe.
Mr Herman (PPE). — (FR) The directive on opening up public contracts, particularly in regard to the telecommunications sector, has been adopted but has not yet been applied, because the practicalities are still being discussed in a working-party.
Kan man få at vide, hvilke indvendinger der er fremført i denne arbejdsgruppe, der i så lang tid har blokeret en foranstaltning, som er så afgørende for udviklingen af den europæiske telekommunikationsindustri og for informationsteknologien? gien?
Can we know what are the objections being made in this workingparty which have held up this measure for so long, at such cost to the development of Europe's telecommunications and information technology industries ?
Hvad angår Kommissionens egne indkøb, sørger den for, at dens markeder etableres på baggrund af specifikationer og normer, som den anser for nødvendige at forbedre, for at industrien skal kunne tage del i fastsættelsen af disse normer.
In the case of its own purchases, the Commission ensures that its contracts are awarded on the basis of the specifications and standards that it thinks it essential to promote so that the industry can have a say in the definition of these standards.
Det er den måde, tingene sker på.
That is how things are done.
I hr. Morelands spørgsmål udtrykkes der ønske om, at man fremmer eller sikrer, at de der, opnår disse ordrer, også er »virkelige europæere«.
Mr Moreland's question reflects a concern to make it more likely or certain that those who obtain these contracts are 'truly European'.
Der er ingen teknisk definition på disse to ord, og det, som Kommissionen prøver at gøre frem for at garantere markedsandele til virksomheder, hvor det er vanskeligt at definere kendetegnene, er at udvikle
There is no technical definition of these two words, and what the Commission is trying to do, rather than guarantee market shares to companies whose characteristics are difficult to define, is to develop a policy — of which Esprit is an example — in which we can ensure that our companies achieve a level of international competitiveness, so that the problem of protection does not arise.
Davignon. — (FR) Jeg tror ikke, at det er nødvendigt at komme ind på tekniske detaljer, det er ikke det, hr.
Mr Moreland (ED). — While I entirely agree with the Commissioner that no issue of protection should arise here, is he not concerned that there may be a lack of a sense of urgency on the part of the Council, on the part of the Member States, as regards the continuing flow of equipment from the Far East and the United States and the fact that many of our companies are still having difficulty in surviving that ?
Davignon adfærdsmønster, forbliver samtlige vore forslag virkningsløse.
This is the result of the continuing 'compartmentalization' of the Community market and the failure to set clearly-defined targets.
Jeg tror, at det er væsentligt, at spørgsmålet stilles i politiske vendinger, således som de tre palamentsmedlemmer, som Kommissionen er helt enig med, gjorde for lidt siden.
That is the crux of the problem, and there is an urgent need to tackle this first difficulty without waiting for the results of longer-term programmes.
Formanden. — Da spørgerne ikke er til stede, vil spørgsmål nr. 42 og 43 blive besvaret skriftligt (').
Mr Davignon. — (FR) I do not think it is nessary to go into the technical details, and this is not what Mr Hermann is asking.
Spørgsmål nr. 44 af Enright (H-138/83):
Mr Herman asks what is behind the technical objections.
Herman spørger mig om. Han spørger, hvad der skjuler sig bag indvendingerne af teknisk art. Bag de tekniske indvendinger skjuler sig et vist antal medlemslande, som endnu i dag ikke er overbeviste om, at deres nationale marked er tilstrækkeligt til udvikling af deres industri.
What is behind the technical objections is the fact that even today a number of countries are not yet convinced that their domestic markets are not big enough for the development of their industries.
Det er det gamle spørgsmål om bundne markeder, som hr. Moreland rejste for lidt siden.
This is the old question of captive markets, to which Mr Moreland was referring a moment ago.
Kernen i problemet er, at, selv om den europæiske teknologi er god, selv om dens konkurrenceevne er udmærket, er den i dag alligevel ikke i stand til at tilvejebringe de nødvendige midler til sin udvikling, fordi markedet er for lille. Et eksempel.
The nub of the problem is that nowadays, although European technology is good and its competitiveness excellent, it is still unable to fund its development on the scale necessary because its market is too small.
Ingen medlemsstat er i stand til at udvikle sit telekommunikationssystem på en sådan måde, at dens industrielle udnyttelse kan finansieres.
No single State is in a posi tion to develop its telecommunications network to an extent which would allow such industrial develop ment costs to be recovered.
Det økonomiske problem er indlysende: hvis vore amerikanske og japanske konkurrenter tjener penge, hvis deres virksomheder blomstrer og dermed bidrager til deres økonomis vækst, og hvis vi samtidig for ikke at miste vor konkurrenceevne er nødt til at give tilskud til vore industrier for at nå samme resultat, kan man meget let forestille sig, hvad der vil ske med den økonomiske udvikling.
The economic problem is clear : if our America and Japanese competitors are earning money, if their companies are thriving and therefore contributing to the growth of their economies while at the same time we, to avoid losing our competitiveness, are having to subsidize our companies in order to achieve the same result, it is abundantly clear what the effects will be in terms of economic development.
Hos de andre vil teknologien skabe mere rigdom i deres lande, hos os vil vi for at forblive konkurrencedygtige inden for denne teknologi være nødt til at tage pengene i statskassen. Og de økonomiske resultater vil fjerne sig stadig mere fra hinanden.
Their technology will create greater wealth in their countries, while we shall have to resort to the public purse in order to keep our technology competititve and the gap in economic performance will grow ever wider.
Det er altså et spørgsmål om politik og vilje.
It is therefore a matter of policy and will.
De tekniske spørgsmål er den skærm, bag hvilken regeringerne søger ly.
The technical issues are providing governments with a screen to hide behind.
Det er ikke den sande grund.
They disguise the real motives.
Hvilke planer har Kommissionen for at forhindre, at dette sker, idet man på denne måde sælger arbejdspladser? pladser?
The problem at this stage is attributable as much to the lack of a Community policy as to the success of
Det er alt det, vi gør for at stimulere ændringen.
Debates of the European Parliament
Der er imidlertid mulighed for intervention.
prevent the growing of successful varieties.
Jeg tror, at teksten fastsætter en begrænset intervention, enten når markederne oplever urolige betingelser eller en overdreven ustadighed, eller når man vil give markedet et signal.
The Commission does not agree that there has been any failure to consider the possible effects of the Regulations, either when they were drafted and adopted or at any time during the negotiations on the enlargement of the Community.
Der er truffet aftale om, at parterne i disse tilfælde konsulterer hinanden for i det givne tilfælde at handle i fællesskab.
Like all other legal provisions, these Regulations can of course give rise to difficulties.
Det er altså ganske givet ikke det, som hr. Israël forventer, men det er utvivlsomt et af de mål, der undersøges, på et område, hvor der før Fællesskabets vedkommende ikke eksisterer nogen fællesaktion.
The fact is that the EEC provisions are based on the principle that seeds — including vegetable seeds — may only be put onto the market if they are of a variety which is known to be pure, homogeneous and stable.
Vi vil om nogle måneder se, om vi effektivt på ny kan indlede en bedre organiseret politik vedrørende valutakursstabilitet. takursstabilitet.
All vegetable varieties which meet these requirements can, according to the EEC provisions, be included in the Member States' lists of varieties and in the EEC list of vegetable varieties.
Enright (S). — (EN) Et meget hurtigt indlæg til forretningsordenen, hr. formand, og jeg må sige, at jeg er glad for den hurtige måde, hvorpå De leder spørgetiden. Må jeg imidlertid skrive til Kommissionen om disse vanskeligheder, og kan vi løse sagen på denne måde?
Mr Enright (S). — Whilst I praise wholeheartedly the Commission's desire to stop crooks on the market, is it not also true that they should be very sensitive to the needs of ordinary amateur gardeners and that in this particular case they are not being so ?
Formanden. — Det er De velkommen til, hr. Enright.
That will be a formidable combination in defence of the Leeds lettuce.
Spørgsmål nr. 45 af Israel (H-154/83):
It is a question of whether or not we are prepared to change our rules of conduct.
Israël (DEP). — (FR) Jeg takker hr. Ortoli for den nøjagtighed og det engagement, som hans svar bærer præg af.
Companies in such a position should be offered a real choice.
Jeg vil gerne spørge ham, hvilken dollarkurs, der ifølge ham for øjeblikket ikke ville bringe den europæiske økonomi i fare?
This is what we are offering them, and our programmes in support of research now require European companies to submit programmes in which they have partners from other Community countries.
Agter Kommissionen at foreslå oprettelsen af en europæisk garantifond for at prøve at opretholde en stabil dollarkurs i Europa gennem effektive interventioner på valutamarkederne?
That is all that we are doing to stimulate change. But if the Member States are not prepared to change their rules of conduct, all the measures that we propose will come to nothing.
Ortoli. — (FR) Hvis jeg vidste det, og hvis jeg virkelig havde den tilstrækkelige overbevisning, ville jeg øjeblikkelig forlade Kommissionen for at nedsætte mig som valutahandler...
It is essential in my opinion to view this problem in terms of the political dimension referred to by the three honourable Members who have just spoken, with whom the Commission is entirely in agreement.
Hermann (PPE). — (FR) Fortsætter kontakterne vedrørende dette punkt efter topmødet i Williamsburg?
President. — As the authors are not present, Questions Nos 42 and 43 will be answered in writing '.
Ortoli. — (FR) I næste Ministerråd vil jeg spørge, om vi kan undersøge følgerne af mødet i Williamsburg.
Question No 44, by Mr Enright (H-138/83):
Cousté (DEP). — (FR) Jeg har med stor interesse lyttet til hr. Ortolis svar, men jeg vil gerne stille ham et tillægsspørgsmål.
Mr Dalsager. — (DA) This is, after all, a highly technical proposal and, since I am not a specialist in the field, I will of course ask the officials and specialists on my staff to investigate any complaints which may be received from the smallholders and amateur gardeners concerned anywhere in the Community.
Ortoli, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (FR) Den valutapolitik, der er vedtaget, da vi oprettede det europæiske monetære system, dvs. ved udgangen af 1978, fastsætter, at vi skal tilstræbe at koordinere vore økonomiske aktiviteter med tredjelande.
Mr Enright (S). — A very brief point of order, Mr President, and I do appreciate the way you are getting through Question Time so quickly.
Dette har i praksis ikke kunnet finde sted, navnlig ikke med De forenede Stater, fordi den gældende holdning var, at der ikke blev grebet ind på markedet.
Could I write to the Commission about these particular difficulties, and can we resolve it in that way ?
Jeg siger dette, fordi man i praksis ikke kan administrere valutaforbindelser med tredjelande uden at have en aftale.
President. — You are quite free to do so, Mr Enright.
Det er ikke os alene, der skal justere dollarkursen, det er helt indlysende. ende.
Question No 45, by Mr Israël (H-l 54/83):