natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Maries, medlem af Rommissionen. — (DE) Hr. formand, Kommissionen glæder sig over, at den jdmærkede betænkning af hr. Harris ikke blot indelolder en indgående analyse af de problemer, som de Derifere kyst- og øregioner i Fællesskabet står sverfor, men også en række nye tanker og forslag til øsning.
May 1 also point out in this connection that, as emerges clearly from the Regional Fund's annual report, the peripheral maritime regions benefit from the lion's share of aid from the nonquota part of that Fund. Moreover, a special chapter of the First Periodic Report on the economic and social situation of the regions of the Community was devoted to the peripheral regions' problems.
Som bekendt har Kommissionen altid givet disse regioner en fortrinsstelling i sin regionalpolitik.
The Commission in fact went even further, giving added emphasis to this priority in the proposals it submitted, and which you supported, in the framework of the review of the Regional Fund.
Desuden omfatter den nye vindyrkningsforordning, der vedtoges i 1982, øgede interventionsforanstaltninger, der ikke blot vil have positive konsekvenser for producenternes indtjening, men som også skulle forhindre, at de eksempler på intolerance og de krænkelser af princippet om fri bevægelighed for varer, man hidtil har kunnet beklage, gentager sig fremover.
The Commission did not neglect to pursue breaches of the Treaties in this sector by legal and political means. Moreover, the wine-growing regulation adopted in July 1982 contains stronger intervention measures, which will have positive effects on producers' incomes and should prevent any repetition of such expressions of intolerance or infringements of the principle of free trade as have regrettably occurred to date.
1-690/82 — KOM(82) 578 endel.) til forordning om prisdannelsen for godsuansport ad landevej mellem medelmsstaterne.
to the Council (Doc. 1-690/82 — COM(82) 578 final) for a regulation on the formation of rates for the carriage of goods by road between Member States.
I forhandlingen indgår mundtlig forespørgsel med forhandling (dok.
Also included in the debate is the oral question with debate (Doc.
1-192/83) af Seefeld m. fl. til Rådet:
1-192/83) by Mr Seefeld and others to the Council :
Om: Kommissionens forslag dl forordning om prisdannelsen for godstransport af landevej mellem medlemsstaterne (KOM(82) 578 endel.)
Subject : Commission proposal for a regulation on the formation of rates for the carriage of goods by road between Member States (COM(82) 578 final)
Vil Rådet forklare, hvorfor det anmoder Parlamentet om at afgive sin udtalelse om oven nævnte forslag inden mødet i Rådet af trafikministre den 16. december 1982 på trods, af, at det så sent som 6. oktober 1982 har hørt Parlamentet? mentet?
Will the Council explain its reason for requesting Parliament to deliver its opinion on the above proposal in time for the meeting of the Council of Transport Ministers on 16 December 1982, despite having consulted Parliament only on 6 October 1982?
Er Rådet af trafikministre indstillet på at afholde et ekstraordinært møde i begyndelsen af 1983, for eksempel i marts, med henblik på at nå frem til en afgørelse vedrørende dette forslag?
Is the Council of Transport Ministers prepared to hold an extra meeting early in 1983, for example in March, with a view to reaching a decision on this proposal ?
Man kan dog hverken henholde sig til overholdelse af de forpligtelser, der fremgår af traktaten, eller til fællesskabssolidaritet til fordel for middelhavsområderne, hvis man tillader, at den ene af de pågældende parter — også et ugunstigt stillet område som Sicilien — kan unddrage sig traktatens forpligtelser eller Fællesskabets politik.
Mr Moreland (ED), deputy rapporteur. — Mr President, the problem that lies behind this particular proposal is that many years ago, a number of governments within the Community 'got sucked in to' — if that is the right phrase — providing compulsory rates for road hauliers. In other words, the government set the rate for road hauliers.
Moreland (ED), stedfortræder for ordføreren. — (EN) Hr. formand.
In other coun tries and — I think it is fair to say in this respect, the Federal Republic — it has led to rather high rates for transport.
Inden jeg tager ordet, vil jeg bede Dem vejlede mig, for det vedrører denne forhandling.
In the past, of course, where there have been compulsory rates in two Member States, compulsory rates have reigned.
Den mundtlige forespørgsel for transportudvalget til Rådet foretages også i denne forhandling.
Mr Moreland (ED), deputy rapporteur. — Mr President, before I speak, I need your guidance, because the oral question, on behalf of the Committee on Transport, to the Council is also included in this debate.
Men jeg ser nu faktisk ikke, at Rådet er til stede.
Now I do not in fact see the Council present here.
Kan jeg forvente et svar eller ej?
Am I in fact to expect a reply, or not ?
Med andre ord, hvis der ikke kommer noget svar, kan forespørgslen da foretages særskilt på et senere tidspunkt, når Rådet er til stede?
In other words, if there is to be no reply, can the question be taken separately at a later date when the Council is present ?
Formanden. — Men den er opført på dagsordenen.
President. — But it is down on the agenda.
Jeg mener, at vi bør tage den med — medmindre De ønsker at udsætte Deres forespørgsel?
I think that we must bear this in mind, unless you want to put your question at another time.
De er således uforenelige med artikel 92 i EØF-traktaten.
In other words, prices would really be recommended rather than be made compulsory.
Moreland (ED), stedfortræder for ordføreren. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg tror, jeg vil sende den til transport udvalget til behandling i vort næste møde.
Mr Moreland (ED), deputy rapporteur. — Mr President, I think 1 would refer this back to the Committee on Transport for consideration at our next committee meeting.
Det er jo latterligt at tille en forespørgsel, som vi ikke får noget svar på.
It is obviously ridiculous to put a question to which we get no answer.
Jeg skal nøjes med betænkningen.
I shall confine myself to the report.
Hr. formand, vi har her i Parlamentet ved mange lejligheder drøftet landbrugspriseme.
Mr President, we have in this Parliament, on many occasions discussed agricultural prices.
I dag drøfter vi priserne for godstransport ad landevej inden for Fællesskabet.
Today we are discussing the rates for road haulage operations within the Community.
Man kan jo nok påstå, at disse priser er lige så vigtige for vore leveomkostninger som vore landbrugspriser.
It is in fact arguable that these rates are as important to our cost of living as are our agricultural prices.
Hvis jeg må belyse det, kan jeg sige, at Ά af prisen på mælk er omkostninger ved at transportere den.
Indeed, if I may give an illustration of that, one-third of the cost of milk is attributable to the cost of transporting it.
13 % af omkostningerne på øl skyldes transportomkostninger.
13 % of the cost of beer happens to be due to transport.
For så vidt angår fødevareindustrien generelt — og jeg udelukker selvfølgelig øl
For the food industry as a whole — and, of course, I exclude beer as a food — something between 10% and 15% of costs are attributable to road haulage rates.
Det er derfor umiddelbart forståeligt, at dersom man tillader sådanne undtagelser fra dette grundprincip, vil det i praksis betyde, at man gennemfører en renationalisering af den fælles land brugspolitik, hvilket hverken er i Kommissionens eller Fællesskabets eller i den pågældende regions inte resse, og som slet ikke burde legaliseres af Europa-Parlamentet eller noget andet organ.
We wish to see that industry made more competitive. I believe that the Commission's proposal is a step in that direction and that this Parliament should support it with the one or two amendments, particularly the important amendment which lays down a maximum period of 5 years, so that this can be reviewed again and, we hope, further steps taken in the direction of liberalization. tion.
Formanden. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
(The speech was being between some Members)
Nr. 1-299/321 vloreland forslag, specielt det vigtige ændringsforslag der fast sætter en maksimal periode på fem år, således at det atter kan tages op til revision og der forhåbentlig kan tages yderligere skridt i retning af liberalisering.
The document we are about to discuss is an important one, because it deals with applying the Fourth Directive on the accounts of commercial concerns (which has been adopted and will be taking effect in our countries at the end of the year) to all European banks and other financial institutions.
lom føde — kan mellem 10 og 15 % af omkostningerne henføres til transportomkostninger.
Mr Burke, Member of the Commission. — Mr President, I can be brief in thanking the Parliament for the way in which it has treated the proposal before it.
Så det er et kke uvæsentligt element i leveomkostningerne for Fællesskabets folk ...
The draft resolution adopts the basic principles that rates for the carriage of goods by road between Member States should be formed freely.
'Taleren forstynes af samtaler rundt om i salen)
This being the case, I think we are very happy with it.
.. det er så vigtigt, at jeg ville ønske, at foke her undt omkring mig ikke ville føre en række andre liskussioner men høre efter hvad jeg siger.
In regard to Amendment No 1, the change in the wording of Article 7 (2) to specify what shall be the consequences of consulting transport users and freight forwarders when drawing up reference tariffs, the report by your Transport Committee raises a number of questions and we, in the Commission, might be disposed to adopt as our own those changes put forward as I suggest.
De tillader måske, hr. formand, at jeg gentager jeg 'ille ønske, at man af høflighed ville holde op med at liskutere bag mig og rundt om mig, medens jeg har > rdet. formanden. — De har ret, og jeg synes, alle nedlemmer bør vise så megen høflighed, at de tier tille, medens De har ordet.
On Amendment No 2, in addition to Article 17, to the effect that a copy of the Tariff Committee's annual report should be sent to Parliament, there is no problem, as also on Amendment No 3, the insertion of a clause to the effect that the regulation shall be reviewed in five years.
Burke, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg kan fatte mig i korthed og takke Parlamentet for den måde, hvorpå det har behandlet det foreliggende forslag.
So today we have a proposal for a directive which is, first of all, part of the Community's drive to coordinate — where necessary and with a view to standardizing — the guarantees required in the Member States of companies within the meaning of Article 58 (2) to protect both associates and third parties.
Forslaget til beslutning tiltræder de fundamentale principper om, at tariffer for godstransport ad landevej mellem medlemsstaterne bør bestemmes frit.
In second place, the document is one which completes Community legislation on the conditions of operation of credit institutions.
Da det er tilfældet, er vi meget tilfredse med det. Kommissionen mener, at på et marked, der allerede i høj grad er underkastet væsentlige bindinger — kvotaordningen er det mest ind lysende eksempel — er et system med vejledende tariffer et middel til opnåelse af de største fordel både for transportmarkedet og for folk i al almindelighed.
On 28 June 1973, the Council adopted a directive in this field, with the aim of doing away with restrictions on the establishment and free provision of services and, on 12 December 1977, there was a directive on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions on access to the activity of credit establishments and how to carry it out.
vloreland (ED), stedfortræder for udføreren. — (EN) 'roblemet bag dette forslag er, hr. formand, at for nange år siden blev en række regeringer fra Fælles kabet »narret« — om jeg så må sige — til at indføre ibligatoriske tariffer for godstransport ad landevej, vied andre ord, regeringen fastsatte afgiften for andevejstransporten.
I still have one comment to make on the draft resolution before you, and that refers to paragraph 10, which considers that the period of application of the minimum tariffs should be limited to a specified period.
Nogle gjorde det ikke.
The aim here is to make the proposal coherent.
Det er iverflødigt at sige, at dette har skabt problemer, fordi logie lande ikke har kunnet håndhæve afgifterne.
I have to admit that the idea was adopted as a working assumption and appears in the explanatory memorandum.
I ndre lande — og jeg synes, det i denne forbindelse r rimeligt at nævne Forbundsrepublikken — har det nedført temmelig høje transportafgifter. For Fælles kabet opstår problemet naturligvis, når vi taler om ransport inden for Fællesskabet.
Nevertheless, it was decided that when compulsory tariffs were introduced, it would be better instead to offer the possibility of negotiating special contracts without time limits in order to make the market as flexible as possible in the face of so very many constraints.
Hvad slags afgifter kal der fastsættes?
In general, we thank the Parliament and welcome this proposal.
Vi går et skridt i retning mod såkaldte eferencepriser. Med andre ord, der vil i virkeligleden blive tale om vejledende priser fremfor obligaoriske.
Well, it applies to any bank or financial institution with a legal status as a company in the Member States — i.e. it does not include branches of companies whose headquarters are outside the Community.
Det er udvalgets generelle opfattelse, at dette orslag skal vedtages.
The Commission has announced that a special text is being drawn up.
Jeg bemærker også, at den Imindelige opfattelse i økonomi- og valutaudvalget r, at det bør accepteres.
The Legal Affairs Committee has asked to see the method used and the anticipated contents as soon as possible.
eg håber derfor, at Parlamentet vil acceptere Drslaget.
President. — The next item is the report (Doc.
Jeg mener, at det bør acceptere det i erkenelsen af, at det for et par medlemsstater vil være ontroversielt.
1-117/83) by Mrs Vayssade, on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (Doc.
Jeg har stadig en kommentar til beslutningsforslaget, nemlig til punkt 10, hvori der gives udtryk for, at gyldighedsperioden for mindstetarifferne bør begrænses til en nærmere fastsat periode.
The aims of this text are to make the accounts of banks and financial institutions in the Community more faithful and, as far as possible, of maximum clarity and comparability — as is the case with commercial concerns.
Formålet er her at få forslaget til at hænge sammen.
So we had to deal with a certain number of problems with a view to doing this.
Generelt takker vi Parlamentet og hilser dets forslag velkomment.
I shall mention four of them, because I think they were the most important issues raised in the Commission.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok.
Vayssade other Members in the Legal Affairs Committee did not want to tread this path of compromise and did not accept our attempt.
1-117/83) af Vayssade for retsudvalget over forslag fra Kommissionen for De euro pæiske Fællesskaber til Rådet (dok. 1-95/81 — KOM(81) 84 endel.) til direktiv om bankers og andre penge- og finansieringsinstitutters årsregnskaber.
In these circumstances let me say that the Legal Affairs Committee's report was weakened by several amendments which not only lead to less clarity in the balance sheets — to put it very cautiously — but have made the Commission's entire, self-contained proposal less clear than it was before.
Vayssade (S), ordfører. — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg er lidt ked af, at denne betænkning først bliver behandlet kl. 13.15 på en fredag i en næsten tom sal.
Since this is such an important issue, I think we should not vote on it now, given the number now present in the Chamber although without having any illusions as to the outcome of the vote.
Imidlertid skulle det ikke gælde for pengeinstitutter og banker, der havde særlige problemer.
So I request that it be ascertained whether a quorum is present.
Det første problem vedrører rækkefølgen i regnskaberne.
The first was the order in which the balance sheet should be presented.
Kommissionen har valgt en løsning, der inde bærer faldende likviditet for aktivposterne.
The Commission had opted for a solution involving decreasing liquid assets.
Retsudvalget har ikke fulgt Kommissionens forslag, men har ladet medlemsstaterne stå frit.
The Legal Affairs Committee did not follow the Commission's proposal, leaving the Member States a free hand.
Jeg må sige, at jeg personlig beklager det, og at det fratager forslaget en stor del af dets harmoniserende aspekt.
I have to say that, personally, I regret this situation as it means that the text makes for far less harmony.
De andre problemer vedrører regnskabernes klarhed: Er det ønskeligt at omordne poster på regnskabet, at modregne mellem poster på tabs- og vindingskontoen, altså for ikke at være helt tro mod de bogholderimæssige posteringer og kun vise saldiene i årsregnskabet?
The other problems were to do with the clarity of the accounts — could items on the balance sheet be grouped together and could items be set off in the profit and loss account — i.e. not be totally faithful to the accounts and only show credit balances in the accounts ?
Debatten om dette punkt var ret livlig i udvalget.
There was a lot of discussion on this project in the Committee.
Personlig var jeg tilhænger af den størst mulige gennemsigtighed, idet jeg ønskede, at der blev tale om så få sammendragninger som muligt, og at der så vidt muligt ikke skete modregning.
I personally was in favour of maximum transparency, in the hopes that there would be minimal grouping of items and, if possible, no set-off.
Retsudvalget mente, at bankvirksomhed kræver større smidighed i reglemes anvendelse.
The Legal Affairs Committee felt that banking activities called for more flexibility in the application of the texts.
Endelig vedrørte sidste spørgsmål bankernes mulighed for at foretage visse værdireguleringer i nedadgående retning for at opfylde deres særlige forpligtelse til altid at forekomme troværdige over for deres kunder.
The last question was one of the possibility of banks undervaluing certain items on the balance sheet in order to comply with their particular obligation to appear credible to their customers.
Jeg foreslog totalt forbud herimod, og at man udelukkende skulle anvende artikel 39 i det fjerde direktiv.
I proposed that this be prohibited altogether and that only Article 39 of the Fourth Directive be used.
I betragtning af udvalgets modstand tilsluttede jeg mig Kommissionens løsning.
Faced with the hostility of the Committee, I opted for the solution of the Brussels Commission.
Retsudvalget gik et skridt videre ved at kræve, at banker for en række regnskabsposters vedkommende skal kunne foretage en lavere værdiansættelse inden for en grænse på 5 %.
The Legal Affairs Committee went further and asked for the banks to be able to undervalue — to a ceiling of 5 % — a certain number of items on their balance sheets.
For det andet er det også et forslag, der supplerer Fælles skabets retsakter, hvad angår adgang til at optage og udøve virksomhed som kreditinstitut.
Those are the main points and they are, I think, the important aspects of this report.
Det var de væsentligste punkter, der voldte problemer, og som efter min mening udgør denne betænknings vigtigste punkter.
I should like to end by saying that the Legal Affairs Committee would like to see the Council adopt this text by a majority, as happened with the Fourth Directive, if it is unable to reach a rapid unanimous decision. sion.
Sådan er det forslag, De har liggende foran Dem. Der er altså tale om en selvstændig tekst.
President. — I think that that was a different situation, which Lady Elles in any case interpreted differ ently.
Det er ikke første gang, Kommissionen bruger denne fremgangsmåde for at ændre bestemmelserne i et tidligere direktiv.
I take the same line as the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions and I am going to stick to that.
Retsudvalget har godtaget den.
I think that we will not get finished with the agenda this morning.
Da samtlige ændringsforslag på en enkelt undtagelse nær stammer fra retsudvalget, vil ordføreren selvfølgelig støtte dem under afstemningen.
As, of the amendments that still stand, all, bar one, come from the Legal Affairs Committee, the rappor teur will, of course, be supporting them at the vote.
Det andet spørgsmål vedrørende anvendelsesområdet gik ud på at finde ud af, for hvem dette direktiv skulle være gældende.
Mr Prout (ED). — This directive is of considerable importance to financial institutions throughout the Community.
Det gælder for alle banker og pengeinstitutter i Fællesskabet, der har form af aktieselskaber, hvilket vil sige, at det udelukker filialer af selskaber med hjemsted uden for Fællesskabet.
It will be of assistance to shareholders, depositors and, indeed, other banks in assessing the proper financial position of any particular financial institution.
Sieglerschmidt (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, på dette tidspunkt finder jeg det ikke passende at komme med lange redegørelser.
Mr Sieglerschmidt (S). — (DE) Mr President, honourable Members, at this late stage it does not seem appropriate to enter into long discussions.
Korrekte og klare regnskaber er forudsætningerne for et positivt samarbejde mellem erhvervsvirksomheder og deres forretningsforbindelser på tro og love.
Truthful and clear balance sheets are the preconditions for successful cooperation between economic undertakings and their business partners on a basis of good faith.
Det gælder for alle erhvervsvirksomheder og således også for banker.
This applies to all economic undertakings, and therefore also to banks.
For bankemes opstilling af regnskaber gør der sig naturligvis særlige forhold gældende, men disse særlige forhold må ikke føre til, at princippet om klare og korrekte regnskaber krænkes.
Certain special features apply when banks make out their balance sheets, of course, but this must not lead to any infringemnet of the basic principle of the clarity and probity of the balance sheet.
Jeg skal derfor anbefale ændringsforslag nr. 22 fra retsudvalget, som tillader modposteringer, hvor det er juridisk muligt.
Prout commend to you Amendment No 22 of the Legal Affairs Committee, which allows set-off where it is legally permissible.
Artikel 9 i forslagene vedrører forfaldstid for aktiver og passiver.
Article 9 of the proposals relates to the maturity of assets and liabilities.
Artikel 9, stk. 5, i Kommissionens forslag giver medlemsstaterne mulighed for at tillade visse fravigelser med henblik på et give et korrekt billede af kreditinstitutternes stilling.
Article 9 (5) of the Commission proposals properly permits the Member States to allow certain exceptions to provide a true and fair view of the position of the financial institution.
Sådanne forhold bør angives klart i noterne til regnskaberne.
Such matters should be clearly indicated in the notes to the accounts.
Ændrings forslag nr. 8 af retsudvalget går ud på at lade punkt 5 udgå, hvorved man fjerner et meget nødvendigt element af fleksibilitet, der har til formål at give et korrekt billede af instituttets situation.
Amendment No 8 of the Legal Affairs Committee seeks to delete paragraph 5, thereby deleting a very necessary element of flexibility designed to show a true and fair view of the position of the institution.
Jeg kan derfor ikke gå ind for ændringsforslag nr. 8.
I am therefore against Amendment No 8.
Den socialistiske gruppe har forsøgt at tage hensyn til :n række forståelige ønsker hos bankerne i et rimeligt )g netop forsvarligt omfang, med henblik på at nå rem til et bæredygtigt kompromis.
Mr Moreland (ED). — Mr President, I wanted to make two points in relation to this particular proposal.
Derfor vil vi hvis disse ændringsforslag bliver edtaget, ikke kunne stemme for det foreliggende orslag til direktiv.
I think this is a mistake, because it lumps together changes in respect of loan provisions with similar movements on securities.
En væsentlig del af direktivet vedrører værdiansættelse af aktiver.
An important feature of the directive relates to the valuation of assets.