natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den af stats- og regeringscheferne i Luxembourg for nu snart et år siden vedtagne euro pæiske fælles akt ville ikke være noget uden vor ind sats, hvis ikke Europa-Parlamentet selv i sin egen for retningsorden, i sine forbindelser med Kommission en og i sine forbindelser med Rådet påtog sig sin andel af opgaven.
It is quite impossible today to look to the future of Europe and its peoples unless we have the courage to tell ourselves clearly that what has all too often been discarded as being too old — constitutional safeguards, the thinking of Montesquieu — is in real ity what stands before us as something to pursue, something that is appropriate to the year 2000.
Den rolige tone og klogskaben i hr. Antoniozzis be tænkning beviser for det første, at vi, hvis alt ikke er perfekt på Kommissionens side. i hvert fait har håbet om at nå frem til en effektiv enighed for at fremme Europa. En fælles erklæring underskrevet af begge institutitioner ville være velkommen, så vi virkelig ved, hvor vi står.
All the criticism of constitutional safeguards and all the criticism of political democracy and institutional dialectics that has been made for two centuries are the oldest stuff in circulation, since this criticism, for what it says, takes us back a very long way in history and culture. ture.
For ikke så længe siden — vi oplevede det alle ved begyndelsen af mit mandat i Europa-Parlamentet — overøstes vi med kærlighedserklæringer fra Kommissionens side, til vi næsten ikke kunne tage mere, og den skønne, der ikke lod sig besnære, svarede med et »de er ikke andet end Rådets sekretariat«.
In the not too distant past — we all remember the time, it was when I first came into this Parliament — we came to grow tired of the unrelenting amorous attentions paid by the Commission to the European Parliament, which were rebuffed with the words: 'You are just the Council's secretariat'.
Måske blot misstemning mellem elskende; vilje til at stimulere energien; utvivlsomt.
Unrequited love in another quarter perhaps, or alternatively a play to fan the flame.
Med den nye Kommission er vi lykkeligt kommet ud af denne » goddag mand økseskaft «-snak, men en skriftlig og fælles erklæring ville i dag, det må vi ikke glemme, udgøre et våben i Kommissionens hænder over for Ministerrådet.
With the new Commission, we have happily left that dialogue of the deaf behind us, but at this stage, let it not be forgotten, a joint declaration in writing would be a useful weapon for the Commission to wield in its dealings with the Council of Ministers itself.
Så kunne den sige: jeg er bundet af min aftale med Euro pa-Parlamentet.
It would enable the Commission to say: sorry, but we are bound by our agreement with the European Parliament.
Vi er altså tilfredse ed hr. Antoniozzis betænkning. Dens ligevægt og klogskab gør, at gruppen helt og fuldt kan give den sin tilslutning med ønsket om at opnå det, som betænkningen indeholder.
Having said this, Mr President, it only remains for me in conclusion to say that Mr Antoniozzi's report is a rich, detailed genuine report; it does not surprise me that it is very moderate in its demands — perhaps a little too moderate for my taste — but, taken overall, I can certainly support it because the Antoniozzi report is undoubtedly oriented towards greater specification of powers and an increase in interinstitutional dialectics, and so for that very reason I shall support it.
Den europæiske fælles akts ratificering er planlagt og forventes ved årets udgang, så den tid, vi har tilbage til forhandlinger mellem Parlamentet og Kommissionen og også med Rådet, er overordentlig kort.
Consequently, I declare that I shall vote for the resolution, not least because I understand that the rapporteur will accept a few modest suggestions that we have put forward, which may make Parliament's way ahead additionally clear, even to 'Green' members.
Men når tre institutioner skal arbejde sammen — Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet og Kommissionen — og der består en aftale mellem to af disse, kan den tredje føle sig udenfor, føle at aftalen er rettet mod den tredje part.
But when there are three institutional players in the game — Parliament, Commission and Council — and there is an agreement between two of them, there is a risk that the third will feel that it is being edged out and that the others have made a pact against it.
Heri ligger værdien af hr. Blumenfelds be tænkning, der viser, at vi ønsker bedre forbindelser med samtlige institutioner.
Hence the importance of Mr Blumenfeld's report, which shows that we seek better relations with all institu tions.
Vi bør dog klart sige, at vi har en prioritering, og at den findes i hr. Antoniozzis betænkning, der lægger hovedvægten på forbindelsen mellem de to fællesskabsinstitutioner.
Nevertheless, we have to state clearly that the priority for us is as stated in Mr Antoniozzi's report, which places the accent on union between the two Community institutions.
Døren er snæver: vi må ikke sigte på Rådet, ikke give det indtryk af, at vi prøver på at drage i ledtog imod det, men vi skal på den anden side klart tilkendegive vort institutionelle valg for Det europæiske Fællesskabs frem tid.
It is a narrow path that we have to tread: on the one hand, we must not put the Council's back up, we must not give it the impression that we are in league against it; on the other hand, we must leave no doubt as to our institutional choice for the future of the European Community.
Mine damer og herrer, vort fælles politiske lod kastes i den korte tid fra nu af og indtil 1987, for i januar skal vi være rede til fuldt ud at gå i gang med de udsigter og den nye mulighed, den fælles akt byder på.
Mr Sutra de Germa (S). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, we must look behind the conventional argument, the wisdom and moderate tone of Mr Antoniozzi's report to find what it is that gives it its full weight and worth.
Luxembourg-aftalerne har i vidt omfang styrket Kommissionens politiske rolle. Desværre gælder det samme ikke for Parlamentets politiske beføjelser.
Let us once again reaffirm the classic argument, the first principle that has been reiterated countless times: the two Community institutions, the Commission and the European Parliament, must join forces in order to make progress in the construction of Europe.
Det er så op til Kommissionen at modtage udfordringen: enten vil den kun føle sig som det, den i virke ligheden er, høje embedsmænd udpeget af Rådet — og så kan den blive eller forblive det, den undertiden har været, sekretariat for Rådet — eller også bliver
The ball is in the Commission's court: either it will see itself as no more than what it is in reality — a group of distinguished persons appointed by the Council — and become or remain what it has occasionally been in the past — a secretariat for the Council — or it can draw on the democratic legitimacy that we members of this Parliament alone represent, having been elected by the people of Europe, and then it can be what it has already become, the embryo of the future government of the European Union.
Lad os holde os til vore egne problemer, for vi får mulighed for at begynde på ny til januar.
Mr Antoniozzi's report also has the great merit, in our view, of putting flesh on the Single European Act.
(TY) Til hr. Schwalba-Hoth vil jeg geme sige, at Montesquieu sikkert var blevet målløs, hvis han hav de været til stede i salen og hørt ham tale.
To Mr Schwalba-Hoth let me say that Montesquieu would indeed have been at a loss for words if he had been present in the Chamber and had heard what he had to say.
Montesquieu havde sikkert ikke forstået, at et direkte valgt medlem af Europa-Parlamentet i den grad kan misforstå traktaterne og ikke indse, at der kun findes én vej fremad for os.
Montesquieu would certainly not have understood how an elected Member of the European Parliament could so completely misunderstand a set of Treaties and fail to see that there is only one road on which we can make any progress at all.
Denne vej går ikke via erklæringer som de af ham afgivne, men udelukkende via utrættelig indsats for mere demokrati.
That road can not be travelled by making statements like the one he has just made, but only through unremitting efforts to secure more democracy.
Men hr. Schwalba-Hoths gruppe befinder sig fremdeles så fjernt fra poli tisk handling og ansvar, at den kan tillade sig den slags ting.
But the group to which Mr Schwalba-Hoth belongs lies so far removed from the realities of political activity and political responsibility that it can afford such extravagances.
Jeg mener, at den kan yde et nyttigt bidrag til at udvikle og forbedre forbinelserne mellem Kom missionen og Parlamentet, Hvilket selvfølgelig er begge institutioners mål.
We need closer cooperation at all stages of the legislative process, especially between the first and second readings, mainly so that there can be real transparency as far as the evaluation of dossiers is concerned.
(FR) Vi har brug for større samarbejde på alle den lovgivende procedures trin — specielt mellem første og anden behandling — ikke mindst med henblik på virkelig transparens i forbindelse med sagernes vurdering. dering.
Mr Estgen (PPE). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, constant improvement in relations between the European Parliament and the Commission is unquestionably an objective meeting the aspirations and needs felt by two institutions which must be regarded as the foundations, albeit in an early stage of development, of the democratic construction of Europe, with the Commission gradually and steadily becoming the genuine executive arm of Europe and the European Parliament, the only institution enjoying the democratic legitimacy conferred by universal suffrage, gradually developing into the real legislature of a real European Union.
Han har fremsat fire meget lovende hensigtserklæringer og svaret klart og opmuntrende på de fire spørgsmål, som jeg stillede ham i januar 1985.
He has made very promising declarations of intent to us, and he replied very clearly and encouragingly to the four questions that I put to him in January 1985.
Jeg er altså over bevist om, at hr. Delors og hans medarbejdere efter vor opfordring dertil vil reagere positivt på den fælles erklæring om vore fremtidige forbindelser med gensidig respekt af vore to institutioners kompetencer og rettigheder.
I am therefore convinced that President Delors and his team will respond positively to our invitation, to the joint declaration on our future relations, in a spirit of mutual respect for the areas of competence and prerogatives of each of our two institutions.
Selv de steder, hvor teksten ikke fornyer, men blot kodificerer eksisterende praksis, har den en nyttig funktion, idet alle implicerede, herunder Kommissionen, mindes om deres respektive forpligtelser.
The ratifications of the Single Act are scheduled or expected by the end of the year, so that there is very little time left for Parliament to negotiate with the Commission, and with the Council also.
Det er ikke af kærlighed, at vi gifter os med Kommissionen.
It is not a love match that we shall be making with the Commission.
Vi skal ikke sove i ægteseng med Kommissionen, men vi vil sætte os til bords med den, til arbejdsbordet, så vi kan komme videre med vore institutioner.
We are not going to be getting into bed together, but we are going to get around a table together to work for the advancement of our institutions.
Hvis den fælles akt og Parlamentets vilje til at udnytte Luxembourg-aftalernes muligheder fuldt ud giver os mulighed for at bevæge os i retning af mere demokrati, et større og mere åbent samarbejde mellem Parlamentet og Kom missionen, så forøger denne mulighed selvfølgelig også faren for konflikt mellem de to institutioner.
The Single Act and Par liament's determination to make the fullest possible use of the opportunities offered by the Luxembourg agreements give us a chance to progress towards a more democratic way, towards greater and more open cooperation between Parliament and the Commission, but at the same time this will clearly increase the risks of conflict between our two institutions.
Derved bliver Parlamentets mistillidsvotums damoklessværd måske endnu mere faretruende. Men jeg er sikker på, at det ikke kommer så vidt.
In that case, the sword of Damocles represented by a motion of censure from Parliament would perhaps be more of a threat.
Vort syn på dette er velkendt for Parlamentet og drøftes for øjeblikket i en anden forbindelse.
The agreements reached in Luxembourg involve a considerable strengthening of the Commission's political role.
På anden vis mener vi, at det nye udkast er tydeligere og klarere, og at det helt rigrigt placerer vore aftaler i den europæiske fælles akts nye og mere dynamiske
Naturally, if Parliament really means to avail itself of all the opportunities afforded by the Single European Act, it will also be honour bound to change its work ing style and concentrate more on its proper concerns, the real problems of the Community, instead of going on and on about every conceivable world issue and
I den henseende og i henseende til det, hr. Prout har sagt, har jeg noteret mig, at der var et latent spørgsmål, der vedrørte nogle af de synspunkter,han vil fremkomme med under en kommende forhandling om Prout-betænkningen.
In that regard, and in regard to some of the things that have been said by Mr Prout, I note that there was an underlying theme, which was related to some of the views which he will be expressing in forth coming debate on the Prout report.
Vi er på mange punkter enige i de svnspunkter, han giver udtryk for.
There are many aspects on which we would find ourselves in agree ment with the views which he expresses.
I den forbindelse er forhandlingen i dag en meget vel valgt lejlighed til i perioden indtil den europæiske fælles akts gennemførelse, som vi alle håber vil finde sted i begyndelsen af 1987, at gå lidt til siden og tænke på, hvordan vi i et samarbejde mellem de to institutioner vil leve op til det nye ansvar, der har sin baggrund i samarbejdsproceduren.
In that connection, this debate today is a most timely opportunity, in the formative period leading up to the implementation of the Single European Act, which will take place, we all hope, at the beginning of 1987, to stand back and think about how we, the two institu tions working together, are going to exercise the new responsibilities that derive from the cooperation pro cedure.
For at være effektiv skal en sådan opnåelse af enighed starte tidligt — i det mindste i førstebehandlingsfasen, måske under førstebehandlingen i udvalget.
Mr Sutherland, Member of the Commission. — Mr President, at the outset I would like to thank Mr Antoniozzi and the subcommittee chaired by Lady Elles, as well as the Political Affairs Committee and the various speakers today, for an informative debate and for the very useful report which is before the House.
Det te er Kommissionens foreløbige konklusion, hvor vi endnu en gang glædelig nok synes at være på bølge længde med både hr. Prout og hr. Planas Puchades.
I think it can make a useful contribution to the development and improvement of relations between the Commission and Parliament, which, of course, is the aim of both our institutions.
Det vil ikke være for meget at sige, at førstebehandlingen er en afgørende fase i hele proceduren.
This is something that has been underlined and stressed by President Delors and other Members of the Commission on various occasions since this Commission assumed office.
I den fælles akt selv er der kun lidt eller overhovedet ingen hjælp af finde med hensyn til, hvordan vi kan gøre førstebehandlingsfasen effektiv.
That is going to be difficult and it is going to require a considerable degree of dialogue between Parliament and the Commission.
Vi bør efter min me ning bruge vor kollektive institutionelle fantasi og finde frem til formelle og uformelle dialogprocedurer, der bidrager til at skabe en så stor enighed som muligt i hver fase.
I should like therefore to offer the House some brief reflections on how our thinking is going on these difficult and complex issues.
Det bliver vanskeligt, og det vil kræve en omfattende dialog mellem Parlamentet og Kommissionen.
As the rapporteur has told the House, the present pro posal is very close to the one drawn up but never dis cussed in the full House in 1984.
Jeg kan kun til slutte mig det, jeg forstår er hovedindholdet i det arbejde, hr. Prout og udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender har udført, enmlig at proceduren er en samarbejdsprocedure og ikke en konfliktprocedure. Jeg mener, at der er af helt afgørende betydning. ning.
The then Commissioner responsible for relations with Parliament, Mr Andriessen, took an active part in the discussions lead ing up to that text, as I myself have done in this second round.
Dette er helt på linje med et af Kommissionens hovedanliggender, nemlig at proceduren ikke bør stand se og føre til, at mange forslag ikke vedtages i Rådet ved afslutningen af fristen på tre måneder efter Par lamentets andenbehandling og Kommissionens reaktion på dets ændringsforslag.
This goes to the heart of one of the Commission's main concerns, namely that the procedure should not seize up and lead to many proposals failing to be agreed in Council at the end of the three month's time-limit, following Parliament's second reading and the Commission's reaction to your amendments.
Det vil efter min mening være en yderst alvorlig hindring for virkeliggørelsen af det planlagte inteme marked.
It would be a most serious obstacle, I think, to the realization of the internal market on target.
Det følger derfor heraf, at det er i vor fælles interesse, at der opnås enighed mellem institutionerne, i det mindste om de væsentligste punkter i en lov.
It therefore follows that it is in our common interest that a consensus between the institutions, at least on the most important points of legislation, should emerge.
Vi må være i nær kontakt med grupperne, udvalgene og med Parlamentets synspunkter.
In 1984 the Commission gave its approval to the text as it stood.
Jeg mener, at vi er nødt til at inddrage de personer, der udformer Parlamentets synspunkter, i en tidlig fase ved udarbejdelsen af vore forslag.
We preferred then, and I should say that we prefer now, broader institutional agreements involving all three political institutions of our Com munity, but we remain favourable to making progress wherever we can.
Dette betyder, at forbindelserne med Parlamentet vil blive et mere centralt politisk anliggende for Kommissionen, og at disse forbindelsers iboende politisk karakter vil rykke i forgrunden.
Indeed, even where the text does not innovate but merely codifies existing practices, it per forms a useful function in reminding all concerned, including the Commission, of our respective obligations.
Dette har, er vi klar over, konkrete følger for vort arbejde i Parlamentet.
It will help, I think, to avoid misunderstandings, which are all too often the result of difficulties between institutions.
Vi vil undertiden være nødt til at indtage en højere profil og søge at bidrage mere effektivt til, at der opnås enighed i Parlamentet.
Therefore we can approve this agreement as an excellent basis for discussion, as Article 2 of the resolution before the House asks us to do.
Når vi accepterer ændringsforslag, skal vi være villige til at forsvare dem under alle drøftelser i Rådet eller også være mere villige til at betro Parlamentet, hvorfor vi har handlet på den måde, vi har gjort.
Indeed, I would go so far as to say that none of the 1986 additions poses any difficulties, except those relating to the delegation of implementation provisions, mainly paragraph 19 of the motion for a resolution.
Vi bør måske erkende, at jo bedre informeret Parlamentet er, desto mindre sandsynligt er det, at det vil komme i konflikt med andre institutioner, navnlig som et resultat af misforståelser.
Our views on this are well known to the House and are being discussed in a different form.
Vi er helt klar over, at disse ting også ligger Parlamentet meget på sinde, og vi agter at anlægge en åben og konstruktiv strategi over for dem i vore fremtidige drøftelser med Parlamentet i de forskellige parlamentariske organer, der er inddraget.
It would perhaps be preferable to await the final outcome of discussions relating to the Hänsch report before set ting any formula in cement in that particular area.
Jeg er imidlertid sikker på, at De ikke behøver at blive mindet om, at et af regeringskonferencens vigtige mål var at øge Parlamentets demokratiske medvirken i Fællesskabets beslutningstagning, hvilket samarbejdsproceduren, om end ufuldkomment, er et svar på.
However, I am sure that you do not need reminding that an important goal of the intergovernmental con ference was to increase the democratic input into Community decisionmaking by this Parliament, to which, however imperfectly, the cooperation procedure responds.
Selv om både Parlamentet og Kommissionen har udtrykt tvivl med hensyn til, i hvilket omfang den fælles akt har nået det mål, vi i fællesskab har, er det klart i Fællesskabets og Europas interesse, at vi gør vort bedste for at gennemføre bestemmelserne effektivt.
Whilst both Parliament and the Com mission have expressed doubts about the extent to which the Single Act has achieved the objective which we jointly would have had, it is obviously in the inter ests of the Community and of Europe that we do the best we can to implement the provisions effectively.
Det er derfor efter min mening vigtigt, at den enighed, der opnås under den proces, som jeg har beskrevet, tager højde for Parlamentets synspunkter, måske i højere grad end f.eks. den nuværende sam rådsprocedure gør.
It is therefore important, I think, that the consensus arrived at in the process which I have described should take Parliament's views into account, perhaps more fully than, for example, the present conciliation procedure does.
Samrådsprocedurens mekanisme giver en vis mulighed for dette — som det blev erkendt i Parlamentets beslutning af 16. januar 1986 — idet den forpligter Parlamentet til at udnytte den fælles akt fuldt ud.
The cooperation procedure's mechanism offers some chance of this — as your resolution of 16 January this year recognized — when it commits
Vi kan ikke gøre alt. Vi har begge med rette været optaget af Rå dets ineffektive arbejdsmetoder og presser på for at
Otherwise, we think that the new draft is crisper and clearer and quite rightly places our arrangements in
Sutherland få ændret Rådets inteme regler med henblik på at forbedre situationen.
Parliament to exploit the Single Act to the fullest extent.
Marinabo (COM). ­ (IT) Hr. formand, kære kolle­ger, efter at der er forløbet over et år, siden Parla­mentet drøftede spørgsmålet om indvandrerpolitik­ken, og siden Rådet vedtog resolutionen om retnings­linjer for Fællesskabets indvandrerpolitik, mener vi, at tiden er inde til at gøre status over situationen vedrørende de vandrende arbejdstagere og deres fa­milier.
been concerned about the ineffectiveness of the Council's working methods and are pressing for changes in the Council's internal rules to improve the situation.
Disse forsinkelser, som kan tilskrives Kommissionen, medfører store ulemper for de mange millioner fællesskabsborgere, som er bosiddende i en anden medlemsstat end deres oprindelsesland.
We must, I think, use our collective institutional imagination in developing formal and informal processes of dialogue which can make for the greatest possible consensus at each stage.
Jeg er også enig i det synspunkt, der er givet udtryk for, nemlig at det er absolut nødvendigt at træffe enhver mulig foranstaltning for at sikre, at Rådet.
I agree also with the view that has been expressed with regard to the absolute necessity to take whatever steps we can to ensure proper dissemination of information in terms of Council, Parliament and Commission.
Parlamentet og Kommissionen får alle relevante op­lysninger, Heraf følger også, at vi har samme interes­se i, at Parlamentets arbejdsmetoder er effektive.
It also follows that we have an equal interest in the effec tiveness of Parliament's working methods.