natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Men også her kunne jeg ønske, at de nationale kontrollører kunne få et ord at sige, idet der i modsat fald kunne rejses tvivl om deres ærlighed.
Let us try to anticipate both the substantial and the psychological problems, with an open heart and in a spirit of solidarity, laying aside excesses of self-interest.
Med henvisning til Marek-betænkningens punkt 6 beklarer jeg, at Kommissionen udelukkende påtænker at indføre kontrol inden for frugt-, grønsags- og vinsektoren.
In view of the forth coming elections to our Parliament in 1984 it is our bounden duty in Parliament, and also in the Council and Commission, to do everything in our power to give meaning and justification to that conviction.
Man bør ikke glemme det af ordføreren nævnte memorandum, der kompletterer Kommissionens rapport om 30. maj-mandatet.
Mr Genscher and Mr Colombo emphasized that in their speeches, but we are still waiting for deeds to follow their words.
Heri omtales blandt også korn og oksekød som sektorer, hvor tilsvarende bestemmelser kan indføres, for ellers vil alene middelhavsegnene blive ramt af denne kontrol, og det ville være urimeligt.
I refer to some eight resolutions on improving inter-institutional relationships and on the way in which Parliament would start to revise the Treaties and achieve European Union. Again the question arises 'What has happened to the actions?'
Skovmand (skriftligt). — Det er en beklagelig kendsgerning, at der svindles for betyde lige beløb i forbindelse med EFs landbrugsordninger.
It is said that in the European Economic Community there are two rates of progress in economic development, but three rates along the path towards the political unity of Europe.
På den baggrund har Kommissionen fremlagt et forslag, hvorefter EF-inspektører skal kunne komme på uanmeldte besøg i medlemslandene og kontrolere, at alt går rigtigt til.
The highest rate is continually represented, in terms of its decisions and initiatives, by the European Parliament, which is the most daring among the organs of the Community and is inspired by a noble vision.
Dette forslag støttes af Marek-betænkningen.
In this situation of varying rates, the Euro
Forslaget vil sikkert tiltale mange.
Debates of the European Parliament
Hvem ønsker ikke at bekæmpe svindel?
I thank the staff for their extra work.
Alligevel må vi i Folkebevægelsen mod dansk medlemskab af EF gå imod forslaget.
Mr Hord. — Mr President, the last demonstration by Mr Adamou was quite absurd.
Vi mener, det vil være yderst uheldigt, om EF-myndigheder skal have så vidtgående beføjelser i medlemslandene, som det her foreslås.
As far as I could hear, it was totally impossible for the interpreters to under stand what was being said. I think the President should warn speakers that it is totally counterproductive to read their speeches at an incredibly fast rate.
Og efter vor opfattelse vil forlagets gennemførelse i Danmark kræve en ny folkeafstemming, som næppe vil falde ud til forslagets fordel.
The effort towards militarization is expressed by the implementation of the Davignon-Greenwood report.
I øvrigt vil forslaget nok ikke få de store virkninger på svindelen.
For further details of the voting, the reader is referred to the Minutes.
Den er først og frem mest fremkaldt af EFs indviklede og urimeligt bureaukratiske landbrugsordninger.
May I say that we are also against the holding of a special plenary partsession merely in order to hold debates.
Så længe de består, vil svindelen også gøre det.
What would be the cost of that partsession to the taxpayers of Europe,· and what would the cost of that be in terms of unemployment?
(Bifald)
FAURE REPORT (Doc.
Jeg insisterer på, at Kommissionen tager hensyn til denne anmodning.
1-295/82: Urban concentration) ¡ADOPTED
Jeg kan gå helt ind for flere fiskeriinspektionsfartøjer — de vil yde et bidrag til vor maritime styrke.
The rapporteur spoke in favour of Amendments Nos 9, 15 and 16; and against Amendments Nos 1, 2, 3, 6, 10 and 11.
Davern. — (EN) Jeg vil bede Parlamentet fordømme den racistiske holdning, det britiske konservative medlem netop gav udtryk for.
Mr Faure, rapporteur. — (FR) Ladies and gentlemen, I appreciate the fact that Parliament has adopted this important report which was examined with very great care in committee.
ANDEN BETÆNKNING AF LEGA (dok.
COSTANZO REPORT (Doc.
1-573/82/ÆNDR. sammenslutning for samarbejde«): VEDTAGET
1-462/82: ERDF): ADOPTED
Stemmeforklaring
Explanations of vote
Forth. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er meget skuffet over resultatet af denne forhandling, for vi havde dette oppe under juli-mødeperioden.
Mr Kucchini. — (FR) Mr President, it must be admitted that decisions affecting the economy and geography of regions are taken in the light of regional policy and policies on industry, agriculture and trade.
Dengang havde vi en lang drøftelse om det, og der blev stillet adskillige spørgsmål fra denne side af salen til denne sag.
Regional imbalances have continued to become even more marked and the ERDF since its creation in 1975 has been unable to stop or reverse this trend.
Jeg synes ikke, budgetudvalget har gjort sit arbejde ordentligt, for betænkningen er kommet tilbage til os uden besvarelse af mange af de spørgsmål, vi stillede. Jeg skal erindre Parlamentet om et par af dem.
Mr Costanzo showed how in 1980 the ERDF although considerably increased in size was not able to create as many jobs as in previous years.
For det første var der spørgsmålet om det åbenlyst latterlige antal ansatte, nemlig en kvota på 14 A, 14 B og 27 C-stillinger, hvilket, for at sige det mildt, forekommer over drevent.
The French Communists have always stressed the need for systematic action including new economic structural policies, better competitiveness and a policy to regain a more
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
The French Communists are firmly against this measure which harms the interests of France, which is bearing the brunt of the European policies on restructuring.
For det andet synes jeg ikke, at vi har fået et tilsfredsstillende svar på spørgsmålet om, at når først et personale er fastansat i en af Fællesskabets institutioner, er det umuligt senere at foretage en rimelig ændring i personalestaten. Det er derfor et tilbageskridt, fordi der fjernes et kontrolelement fra styringen af antallet af ansatte.
Mr Moreland. — Mr President, we have just voted a report which is fifteen pages in length in the English version, has fifty-nine paragraphs and, by my reckoning, six thousand words; paragraph 33 is in itself four hundred words long.
Så af alle disse grunde, hr. formand, vil jeg stemme imod; jeg synes, det er et meget sjusket stykke arbejde.
I hope that in future the Committee on Regional Policy and Regional Planning will not fling this sort of thing at us.
Af alle disse grunde vil jeg stemme imod og opfordrer andre kolleger til at gøre det samme.
Mr Skovmand. — (DA) (in writing) Reducing the disparities between weak and strong regions in a country is a formidable task.
Ordføreren udtalte sig: — FOR ændringsforslag nr. 4, 6 og 7; — IMOD ændringsforslag nr. l/ændr., 2, 3, 5, 8 og 9.
No 1-289/269 in favour of Amendments Nos 1 and 2; against Amendments Nos 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14.
NYBORG — BETÆNKNINGEN (dok.
MARCK REPORT (Doc.
Prag. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg finder henstillingerne i Schinzel — betænkningen ejendommelige.
Mr Forth. — Mr President, I am very disappointed in the outcome of this debate, because we had this before us in the July part­session.
Jeg kan gå ind for europæiske frimærker, men uden hr. Schinzels ensrettede nonsens og hr. Welsh's protektionistiske særheder.
I believe this is tantamount to being asked to sign a blank cheque, and I am certainly not satisified to find that we are being asked to approve this in the hope that a satisfactory statute may be passed in due course.
Hr. Welsh siger, at det ville koste Det forenede Kongerige penge, hvis det fulgte trop med de øvrige EF-lande og pålagde de samme takster for post til dem som for post til Det forenede Kongerige internt.
Mr Welsh says it would cost the United Kingdom money if we fell into line with the other Community countries and charged the same rate for mail addressed to them as we do for internal UK mail.
Det er noget sludder.
This is in fact nonsense.
For det første kan og bør det britiske postvæsen blive mere effektivt, og det kunne det spare mange penge ved.
First, the UK Post Office could and should make itself more efficient and could save a lot of money by doing so.
Og for det andet, da posttaksterne for indlands- og EF-post blev hævet ganske betydeligt — med 1 Vz pence — tidligere på året, kunne man have benyttet lejligheden til at standardisere taksten fra Det forenede Kongerige til en hvilken som helst adresse i EF, det være sig Athen, Palermo, Bruxelles, Edinburgh eller Welling Garden City — som tilfældighvis er min valgkreds — ligesom alle andre EF-stater bortset fra Storbritannien og Irland har gjort det.
And secondly, when it raised inland and European rates by a very large amount — 1 Vi pence-earlier this year, it could have seized this opportunity of equalizing the rate from the United Kingdom to any destination in the European Community, whether Athens, Palermo, Brussels, Edinburgh or Welling Garden City — which happens to be in my constituency — just as all Member States have done other than Britain and Ireland.
Og uden skær af racisme.
And no racism implied.
Det ville have vist, at det britiske postvæsen i det mindste har en lille smule fantasi, og at det var indstillet på uden at pådrage sig selv udgifter at inddrage EF bare en anelse mere i vort dagligliv, i stedet for i ganske almindelige menneskers øjne at gøre EF til en kilde til uigennemskuelig, teknisk og somme tider irriterende lovgivning.
This would have shown that the UK Post Office at least had a little imagination and that it was prepared at no cost to itself to make the European Community just a little bit more a part of our everyday life, intead of its being, to the man in the street, a source of obscure, technical and sometimes annoying legislation.
Jeg vil gerne se europæiske frimærker så hurtigt som muligt med værdien angivet i nationale møntenheder — ikke kun for en måned, men permanent.
I want to see European postage stamps as soon as possible with the value expressed in national coinages — not for a month, but permanently.
Og jeg vil gerne se dronningens hoved på vore britiske europæiske frimærker og plads til navne og symboler på alle de andre.
And I want to see the Queen's head on our British European stamps and a space for names and emblems on all the others.
Med stor beklagelse må jeg derfor stemme imod Schinzel-betænkningen, hr. formand.
And so, Mr President, with the greatest regret, I shall vote against the Schinzel report.
For det første hr. Kellett-Bowmans bemærkning på vegne af de konservative: »Det er en kendsgerning, at vi er imod det.« Og for det andet hr. Berkhouwers lidenskab for sådan noget som et frimærke.
Mr President, we are in a most peculiar situation: I have tabled a motion for a resolution calling for a European postage stamp, that text has the support of all members of the Political Affairs Committee of this' House, and now we are expected to vote on a resolution rejecting the postage stamp.
Derfor rejser jeg mig for at lykønske fru Alva Myrdal med Nobels fredspris i dag, og jeg håber, at alle i Parlamentet vil følge mig. Derfor støtter jeg denne beslutning, ærede kolleger, for . . .
Yes, Mr Arndt, that is all, for a few weeks in 1984 and perhaps an occasional stamp a year later, I shall not use any to write to Mr Welsh, but I shall send Mr Welsh in England a messanger to wish him a Merry Christmas without the intervention of the post.
. . . efter samråd med mine venner mener jeg, at det første europæiske frimærke bør bære billedet af en nedrustningsforkæmper, og jeg kan ikke tænke på nogen bedre end Alva Myrdal, der er en af de store europæere og en af fredens store forkæmpere.
The national administrations will do everything in their power to prevent an extension of these few days which Mr Schinzel suggests, and so acceptance of Mr Schinzel's motion for a resolution will deal the death blow to my European postage
(Bifald)
Page 275
Nr. 1-289/267 de Courcy Ling. — (EN) Hr. formand, De vil med lettelse høre, at jeg nægter at lade mig distrahere af den forestilling, hr. Boyes her giver, skønt jeg dog vil bemærke, at i en offentlig meningsundersøgelse, foretaget af The Guardian for nylig — og det er ikke et udpræget pro-konservativt blad — viste det sig, at 63 % af befolkningen i Det forenede Kongerige gik ind for multilateral atomnedrustning, og jeg tror, at de fleste af os her inde også kan gå ind for det ...
Mr de Courcy Ling. — Mr President, you will be relieved to hear that I refuse to be distracted by the entertainment provided by Mr Boyes, although I would remark that in a recent public-opinion poll conducted by The Guardian, which is not a particularly proConservative newspaper, it was shown that 63 % of the population of the United King dom were in favour of multilateral nuclear disarmament, and I think most of us here are in favour of it too.
Nej, jeg lader Dem ikke bryde ind!
No, I will not give way.
Jeg vil gerne tale om det europæiske frimærke og komplimentere hr. Schinzel for hans indsats, men samtidig beklage, at han ikke er gået langt nok, og jeg beklager, at efter meget omhyggelig overvejelse må jeg undlade at stemme om denne beslutning.
I would like to talk about the European postage stamp and compliment Mr Schinzel on his effort, but at the same time complain that he has not gone quite far enough. I regret that after very careful consideration I must abstain in the vote on this resolution.
Grunden til, at jeg undlader at stemme, er, at jeg ikke synes, beslutning en går langt nok med hensyn til at løse det egentlige problem i forbindelse med posttjenesterne i Det europæiske Fællesskab.
The reason why I must abstain is that I do not think it goes far enough to meet the real problem of postal services in the European Community.
For os er Det europæiske Fællesskab i henhold til Romtraktaten et frit marked.
The European Community to us, in accordance with the Treaty of Rome, means a free market.
Det kan stadig tage næsten en uge at sende et almindeligt brev fra Paris til London.
It still can take up to one week for a first-class letter to travel from Paris to London.
Det var et spørgsmål, jeg rejste over for kommissær Davignon her i Parlamentet en aften i foråret 1980.
This was a problem that I raised with Commissioner Davignon in this Parliament one evening in the spring of 1980.
Jeg mener, at Fællesskabets posttjenester udgør en alvorlig hindring for Fællesskabets samhandel, og jeg henstiller indtrængende til Kommissionen at undersøge dette problem nøje.
I think that the postal services of the Community are a serious hindrance to trade within the Community, and I urge the Commission to have a serious look at the problem.
Før den har gjort det, og før vi har undersøgt seriøst, hvorledes problemet kan løses, måske ved at lade nogle af Fællesskabets posttjenester overgå til det private erhvervsliv . . .
Until they have done that and we have some serious research into how the problem can be solved,' perhaps by privatizing some postal services in the Community, ...
Godkendelse af protokollen :
Approval of the minutes : ern; Mr Saby; Mr Aigner; Mr Marck; Mr Dalsager (Commission); Mr Provan; Mr Dalsager
Forøgelse af investeringerne i Fællesskabet. — Forslag til beslutning (dok. 1-701/82) af Giavazzi m.fl.:
Investment in the Community — Motion for a resolution by Mr Giavazzi and others (Doc. 1-701/82):
1-708/82) af Lord O'Hagan, (dok.
1-708/82), Mr Bord (Doc.
1-720/82) af Bord, (dok. 1-731/82) af Helms m.fl.:
1-720/82), and Mr Helms and others (Doc. 1-731/82):
Jern- og stålindustrien. —: Forslag til beslutning (dok.
Steel industry — Motions for resolutions by Mr Bonaccini and others (Doc.
1-725/82) af Calvez:
1-725/82) and by Mr Calvez (Doc 1-729/82):
1-711/82) af Jaquet og Hänsch og (dok.
1-711/82) and by Lord O'Hagan (Doc. 1-722/82):
1-727/82) af De March m.fl. og (dok.
1-727/82), and by Mr Glinne (Doc. 1-714/ 82):
Fremme af afsætningen af smør. — Forslag til beslutning (dok. 1-696/82) af Bocklet m.fl.:
Promotion of butter sales — Motion for a resolution by Mr Bocklet and others (Doc. 1-696/82):
Afstemninger: Moreland, Paulhan, Plaskovitis, Bøgh, Petersen, Boserup
Explanations of vote: Mr Moreland; Mr Paulhan; Mr Skovmand; Mr Plaskovitis; Mr Bøgh; Mr Petersen; Mrs Boserup
Hvis ingen gør indsigelse, betragter jeg den som godkendt.
Debates of the European Parliament
FORSÆDE: PIETER DANKERT Formand ,
IN THE CHAIR: MR D ANKERT
Patterson. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg henviser til side 12 i den engelske tekst, som vedrører den beslutning, vi stemte om i går af Bonaccini m.fl. om Fællesskabets økonomiske og sociale politik, navnlig afholdelse af
President. — Mr Patterson, I understand your remarks. I hope the confusion only arises out of the English text, but perhaps Mr Bonaccini can say what the original text was and what it contains, so that on that basis we can adapt the other texts.
Formanden. — Protokollen fra mødet i går er omdelt.
President. — The minutes of the proceedings of yes terday's sitting have been distributed.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
I call Mr Patterson.
Hvad angår problemer med hensyn til tilrettelæggelsen, har vore institutioner deres respektive formænd, som råder over alle hensigtsmæssige midler til løsning af disse problemer.
As for the, problems of organization, our Institutions have their presidents and possess all the necessary data to deal with the problem.
Det næste møde i Det europæiske Råd finder sted i december.
The next European Council is in December.
Den engelske tekst indebærer derfor, at vi skal afholde en ekstraordinær mødeperiode i november, hvilket De, hr. formand, må finde lige så absurdt som min gruppe i går, da vi stemte imod det.
The English text there fore implies that we shall have to hold a special partsession in November, which you, Mr President, know to be as absurd as my group did yesterday when we voted against it.
Jeg har imidlertid haft lejlighed til at se på den franske, tyske og italienske tekst, der siger noget ganske andet:
This will therefore have to be pointed out in today's minutes and the English minutes modified accordingly.
Formanden. — Det fremgår klart, at den franske tekst er originalteksten.
However, since then I have had the opportunity to look at the French, German and Italian texts, which say something quite different:
I stedet for:
the European Council in the next year.
Dette er noget ganske andet.
— something which is a very different matter.
Jeg tror således, at problemet er løst.
In that case, I think the problem is solved.
Rent bortset fra, at en forskel af denne art mellem den engelske udgave og de øvrige versioner gør vor afstemning i går meningsløs, rejses spørgsmålet om, hvad der bør stå i protokollen, og det er det første spørgsmål, jeg gerne vil stille Dem.
Quite apart from the fact that a discrepancy in the English and other versions of this sort makes nonsense of our vote yesterday, it raises the question of what should be in the Minutes, and that is the first question I want to put to you.
Den engelske protokol er tydeligvis forkert, da den engelske tekst ikke kan være autentisk, eftersom alle de øvrige sprogversioner siger noget andet. Hvorom alting er, var det den engelske tekst, som min gruppe stemte om i går, og som bekendt stemte vi imod den, fordi den var åbenlys absurd. ,
The English Minutes are clearly wrong in the sense that the English text cannot be authentic since all the other language versions say something different.
Patterson. — (EN) Det, jeg gerne vil fremføre, hr. formand, er, at man foruden at indsætte den korrekte version i den engelske tekst også må medtage i protokollen, at den var versionen uden ordene »next year«, min gruppe stemte om. Den foreliggende protokol er en korrekt fortegnelse over det, vi gjorde i går.
Mr Patterson. — My point is, Mr President, that in addition to putting in the English text the correct version, it has to be noted in the Minutes that it was on the version without the phrase 'next year' that my group voted.
Derfor må vi medtage begge dele, både det, vi stemte om, og den ændrede version sammen med en redegørelse for forvirringen.
Therefore you have to include both, both what we voted on and the corrected version, together with an explanatory note about the confusion.
Ellers vil det være helt uden mening.
The matter you refer to will be recorded in today's Minutes.
Jeg vil derfor gerne spørge Dem, hr. formand, hvad De agter at gøre. Må jeg for så vidt angår protokollen foreslå, at både den engelske tekst og de øvrige tekster medtages i den engelske udgave sammen med notits, der meget tydeligt viser, at det var den engelske tekst, altså den forkerte tekst, min gruppe stemte om.
So I want to ask you, Mr President, what you intend to do.
Det er tænkeligt, at vi alligevel ville have stemt imod, men vi kunne ikke på nogen måde have stemt for en tekst, der er så tåbelig som dette.
We might have voted against it anyway, but we could not possibly have voted for a text as stupid as that.
Formanden. — Hr. Patterson, jeg forstår Deres bemærkninger.
President. — Mr McCartin, I am sorry but you should have done so yesterday, then it would have been part of today's Minutes.
Forvirringen skyldes forhåbentlig kun den engelske tekst, men måske kan hr. Bonaccini sige, hvad den oprindelige tekst var, og hvad den inde holdt, således at vi på grundlag heraf kan tilpasse de øvrige tekster.
You cannot change the Minutes a day later by including something which did not happen. pen.
Fergusson. — (EN) Jeg har privat over for Dem rejst spørgsmålet om mødekalenderen og den kendsgerning, at den hvert år udarbejdes meget sent.
Mr Fergusson. — I raised with you privately the question of the parliamentary calendar and the fact that each year it is drawn up at such short notice.
For eksempel ved vi først nu, hvad vi kan indtegne i vore private kalendere for næste år, eftersom kalenderen for udvalgsmøderne først er opstillet nu.
For example, only now do we really know when we are going to be able to fill in our own private diaries for next year, since the calendar of committee meetings is only now being drawn up.
Hvis vi i 'løbet af de næste to-tre måneder skal have en ekstra ordinær mødeperiode, vil dette igen bringe uorden i vore private kalendere, medmindre vi meget hurtigt får at vide, hvornår denne nye mødeperiode skal afholdes.
If we are going to have an extra partsession within the next two or three months it will again upset all our private diaries unless we know very quickly when this new partsession is going to be held.
Bonaccini. — (IT) Hr. formand, jeg kan forstå, at der kan være tale om en oversættelsesfejl, og jeg takker hr. Patterson for at have gjort opmærksom herpå.
President. — Mr McCartin, that does not change yes terday's Minutes.1
Jeg vil gerne fremføre to punkter.
I should like to make two points.
Kan De for det første, hvis vi skal have en ny mødeperiode, foranledige, at der træffes afgørelse herom meget hurtigt, og at vi får oplyst, hvornår den vil finde sted.
First, if we are going to have a new partsession, could you arrange that it will be decided very quickly and that we shall be informed when it is going to take place?
For det andet vil jeg gerne endnu en gang henlede Deres opmærksomhed på dette generelle problem og nødvendigheden af, at man forsøger at få udarbejdet og offentliggjort mødekalenderen godt og vel et år før de pågældende møder.
Secondly, may I once again remind you of this general problem and the need to try and get the parliamentary calendar established and published a good year in advance of the part-sessions concerned?
Formanden. — Jeg vil gerne komme med en kort erklæring.
President. — I should now like to make the following brief statement.