natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der er en hel mængde betænkninger fra mit udvalg, og jeg forstår, at en af dem er udgået, nemlig hr. Irmers betænkning om Comecon.
There are quite a lot of reports from my committee, and I understand that one has been withdrawn i.e. Mr Irmer's report on Comecon.
Kan De forsikre mig, at hele resten er på dagsordenen, selv om jeg ikke hørte dem blive læst op?
Can I have your assurance that all the rest are on the agenda, even though I did not hear them read out?
Enhver af os ved, pressen ved, og også en stor del af offentligheden ved, at Parlamentet på ny er kommet i offentlighedens søgelys, denne gang på en ugunstig måde.
We cannot simply turn parliamentary practice upside down in five minutes, particularly when the matter has not yet been discussed by any of the political groups.
Jeg ved også, at De via en pressekonference har villet give foreløbige oplysninger om sagens gang inden for Parlamentets administration.
I am quite pre pared to consider Mr Forth's request and to draw the necessary conclusions, but this is not the way to go about it.
Men jeg finder det ikke tilstrækkeligt.
President. — As far as I can see, only the Irmer report is off the agenda.
Jeg mener, at den offentlige mening, pressen og ikke mindst vi som parlamentarikere har ret til at vide, hvad der rent faktisk sker.
But what has been adopted is adopted, so if I am wrong, the agenda is still right.
Formanden. — Så vidt jeg kan se, er kun Irmerbetænkningen taget af dagsordenen.
President. — Mr von der Vring, your, request is admissible only if Mr Forth withdraws his request.
Men hvad man har vedtaget, er vedtaget, så hvis jeg har taget fejl, er dagsordenen stadig i orden.
Rule 56 gives him the right to make such a request and to demand that a vote be taken on it.
Sir Fred Catherwood. — (EN) Det må faktisk betyde, at dagsordenen nu er vedtaget!
Sir Fred Catherwood. — In effect that means that the agenda is now adopted!
Vi gik direkte til hr. Forths forslag, så det ikke lykkedes mig at komme med det i tide; ellers ville jeg have gjort det.
We went straight on to Mr Forth's motion, so that did not manage to get in in time; otherwise I would have done so.
Formanden. — Sir Fred, hr. Forths forslag var stadig en del af drøftelsen af dagsordenen, fordi det ville have ændret vore afstemningstider i denne uge.
President. — Sir Fred, Mr Forth's motion was still part of the discussion of the agenda, because it would have modified our way of voting this week.
Jeg kan derfor nu kun spørge, om der er andre indvendinger mod den arbejdsplan, der indtil nu er vedtaget.
So I can only now ask if there are further objections to the order of business we have adopted so far.
Under foredrag ved vi ikke, hvad vi skal sige, når der stilles spørgsmål herom, og det ville glæde mig meget, selv om det kun er en indledende redegørelse, og måske skal de første drøfte spørgsmålet i det udvidede præsidium, om De i løbet af denne uge med en offentlig erklæring i Parla mentet kunne sige, hvad der sker. Det ville jeg være Dem meget taknemmelig for.
Mr de la Malèlene. — (FR) Mr President, I quite sympathize with the proposal put forward by our col leagues, but it does seem to me absurd to try change a system in a plenary sitting and in the heat of the moment.
Cottrell. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne vide, om De faktisk blev færdig med at meddele enkeltheder vedrørende ændringer af torsdagens dagsorden?
I am entirely in favour of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions looking into it to see if they can improve our voting system, which is indeed very bad, but to try to change it just like that, given the difficulty of organizing our debates, that I think is ludicrous!
Formanden. — Ja, vi blev færdige med ændringerne af torsdagens dagsordenen, så vidt de kunne foreslås i dag.
Mr President. — In fact we have completed the changes to Thursday's agenda as far as they could be proposed today.
Jeg går ud fra, at De har andre forslag i morgen tidlig?
Tomorrow morning I suppose you will have further proposals.
Formanden. — Hr. de Goedè, jeg kan sige Dem, at jeg ikke har til hensigt at fremkomme meden erklæring i denne uge i Parlamentet, da jeg ikke tror, at det er min opgave. Det er planlagt, at Revisionsrettens særlige rapporter skal undersøges af det kompetente parlamentsudvalg, det vil i dette tilfælde sige budgetkontroludvalget.
Mrs Dury. — (FR) Mr President, clearly this is a matter for the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions, but I believe that, basically, it also has to do with the publicity given to our work and I wonder, therefore, if we ought not also seek the opinion of the Committee on Youth, Culture, Education, Information and Sport.
Hvis budgetkontroludvalget på grundlag af sine resultater mener at måtte fore lægge en rapport for Parlamentet, er det en mulig procedure.
President. — This is a matter for the Bureau initially and possibly, as far as the form is concerned, for the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions.
Pearce. — (EN) Hr. formand, De tillod fru Dury at komme med en udtalelse, man måske kunne have anfægtet.
Mr Pearce. — Mr President, you allowed Mrs Dury to make a statement which might perhaps have been challenged.
Jeg mener, at det, der foregik ved den
I think what was going on in that vote was not entirely a question of publicity.
Bangemann. — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg ville blot endnu en gang understrege, at hvis der har været uregelmæssigheder og de ansvarlige derfor skal findes, må man gøre alt nødvendigt for at drage dem til regnskab.
President. — Mr Pearce, perhaps you could continue the discussion on that point with Madam Dury outside the hémicycle.
I offentligheden må man kun tale om kendsgerninger, som er styrket ved beviser, ikke om formodninger.
cussed in public, facts backed by evidence, not mere assumptions.
Med denne principielle regel for øje havde min gruppe endda fundet det bedre, hr. formand, om De ikke havde afholdt denne eller hin pressekonference — ganske i modsætning til det, hr. de Goede netop har sagt.
In view of this basic rule, my group would even have preferred it if you had not given any press conference, contrary entirely to what Mr De Goede has just said.
Pearce. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg respekterer Deres syn i denne sag, men måske De ville tage et par bemærkninger til Dem.
Mr Pearce. — Mr President, I respect your judgement on this matter, but I wonder if you could take two points on board.
Formanden. — Jeg tror, at De har ret, hr. Andriessen.
Mr De Goede. — (NL) Mr President, I should just like to say a few more words about this week's agenda.
Det er dog naturligvis nyttigt at få et svar på hr. Irmers spørgsmål.
I had expected to hear you say that you would be making a statement this week.
Hvis denne nye procedure skulle være gældende, hører det efter min opfattelse til de sager, som De skal kunne give et svar på.
I am aware that you have held a press conference to give some provisional information on the situation in the admin­istration of our Parliament. But I do not think that is enough.
Hvis De altså i denne sammenhæng kan gøre det, foregriber vi i mellemtiden den nye procedure.
I feel that the public, the press and above all we parliamentarians have a right to know exactly what is going on.
Den næste, at De giver personalet en kategorisk instruks om ikke at udtale sig til pressen eller offentligt, medmindre De personlig har givet tilladelse til det.
Secondly, you should give a categorical instruction to members of the staff not to speak to the press or the public except in the way that is authorized by you per­sonally.
De medlemmer af forsamlingen — og så vidt jeg ved, er der 434 af dem — der optræder hæderligt, bringes i alvorlig forlegenhed af det, som nogle ansatte har sagt, og jeg ville ønske, at De havde hindret dem i det.
Those Members of this House — and as far as I know it is 434 of them — that are honest in their dealings are gravely embarrassed by things that have been said by members of this staff, and I wish you had stopped them saying it.
Andriessen. — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg råder for øjeblikket ikke over de nødvendige oplysninger.
President. — Thank you, Mr Pearce, I think this is a matter for the Bureau of Parliament.
Det afhænger naturligvis af Parla mentet, om det vil godkende dette forslag.
I think we should close this discussion.1
Der er allerede taget visse skridt.
Perhaps you need to dis­cuss this tomorrow in the enlarged Bureau.
Israël. — (FR) Hr. formand, i vort sidste plenarmøde vedtog Parlamentet to beslutninger, den ene om Afghanistan, den anden om Pakistan.
But I would be grateful if you could make a public state­ment in Parliament this week to explain what is going on.
Jeg mener, vi skal standse denne diskussion (').
I would appreciate that very much.
Kommissionens reaktionpa Parlamentets udtalelser
Action on the opinions of Parliament
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er Kommissionens meddelelse om dens reaktion på Europa-Parlamentets udtalelser og beslutninger (2).
President. — The next item is the statement by the Commission of the European Communities on the ac­tion taken on the opinions and resolutions of the European Parliament.2
Under forhandlingen gav Kommissionen mundtligt udtryk for sin opfattelse.
The procedure is that special reports by the Court of Auditors are con­sidered by the responsible committee of Parliament; in this case it is the Committee for Budgetary Control.
Men jeg læser nu i det dokument, der foreligger for os i dag, at Kommissionen ikke tilkendagiver nogen opfattelse.
If its findings lead that committee to the view that it must submit a report to Parliament, then that is alright.
Det er meget forbavsende, så meget mere som Parlamentet anmodede den om at aflægge beretning inden tre måneder vedrørende hjælpen til afghanske flygtninge, og som på den anden side hr. Haagerups beslutning krævede, at den reviderede sine forbindelser med Pakistan i lyset af den noksom bekendte episode.
I believe, however, that we must observe very strictly the procedural rules involved and we must leave the responsibility to those on whom it is conferred by our Rules of Procedure.
Inner. — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne af kommissæren have at vide, hvordan forslaget til direktiv om produktansvar er viderebehandlet.
Mr Inner. — (DE) Mr President, I should like to hear from the Commissioner what has happened to the pro­posal for a directive on liability for defective products.
Jeg har læst i en avis, at Rådet beskæftiger sig med det.
I read in one newspaper that the Council of Ministers is discussing this proposal.
Men jeg husker, at forsamlingen opfordrede Kommissionen til ikke at fremsende forslaget til Rådet, før Parlamentet endnu en gang havde behandlet det.
I recall, however, that the House asked the Commission not to' forward the pro­posal to the Council before Parliament had reconsid­ered it.
Jeg håber, at mine informationer er forkerte, ifølge hvilke forslaget nu alligevel er fremsendt til Rådet.
I hope that my information — that the propo­sal has been forwarded to the Council — is incorrect.
Hvis kommissæren kan bekræfte over for mig, at informationen er
But if it should turn out that the Commission has submitted the proposal to
(') Taletid — Frist for at stille ændringsforslag: se protokollen. O Se bilag.
Speaking time — deadline for tabling amendments: see Minutes.
for ikke at forpasse det politiske tidspunkt. Jeg vil gerne tilføje, at Kommissionen i hvert fald har informeret det pågældende parlamentsudvalg, således at det var underrettet og har kunnet drøftet dette anliggende.
Mr Andriessen, Member of the Commission — (NL) Mr President, I find myself in a rather difficult position since, as I recall, this item was not discussed at the last partsession and the agreement we have is that, until a settlement is reached on the question of procedure, on which we have now put forward our proposals, this item of the agenda should be restricted to questions on matters before the last partsession.
På baggrund af alt dette er jeg af den opfattelse, at Kommissionen juridisk havde mulighed for at optræde effektivt, og at denne politik er kommet Fællesskabet til gode.
In view of the agreed procedure, I am not therefore quite sure whether this question is in order.
Hvad angår det andet spørgsmål, der vedrører de diplomatiske forbindelser og endog mønsteret i forbindelserne mellem Pakistan og Fællesskabet, meddelte Kommissionen under forhandlingen, at den hidtil ikke har ment at skulle tage sådanne vidtgående skridt efter de foranstaltninger, der var truffet på diplomatisk plan.
With regard to the second question, which concerns diplomatic relations and even the general pattern of relations between Pakistan and the Community, the Commission said during the debate that, in view of the action that has been taken at diplomatic level, it does not consider this the time for such far-reaching steps.
Jeg går heller ikke ud fra, at en nærmere overvejelse vil føre til et sådant resultat, men Kommissionen har endnu ikke indtaget en endelig holdning til spørgsmålet.
I do not believe that further consideration of the matter would result in a change in this view, but the Commission has not yet adopted a final position on the subject. ject.
Harris. — (EN) Hr. formand, må jeg henvise kommissæren til oversigten over beslutninger vedtaget af Parlamentet i sidste mødeperiode.
President. — I think you are perfectly right, Mr Andriessen.
På baggrund af senere begivenheder, specielt rørledningshistorien, vil jeg gerne spørge kommissæren, om det stadig er hans opfattelse?
If you can do so therefore, in this context, we shall be simply anticipating the new procedure. , .
Kirk. — Hr. formand, sidste år behandlede Parla mentet to forslag fra Kommissionen.
Mr Kirk. — (DA) Mr President, last year Parliament discussed two proposals from the Commission.
Det ene forslag var undtagelser til tiltrædelsestraktatens artikel 100 om adgang i Fællesskabets farvande, og det andet forslag var om fordelinger af kvoter mellem medlems landene for 1981.
One proposal was for derogations to Article 100 of the Treaty of Accession on access to Community waters. And the second proposal dealt with the allocation of quotas to the Member States for 1981.
Det er ikke lykkedes Parlamentets landbrugs- og fiskeriudvalg at få de to forslag i hænde, således at man kunne sikre, at der også blev afgivet en udtalelse fra Parla mentet om kommissionsforslagene.
I do not even know whether this would come under the new procedure, at least in the form proposed by the Com mission.
Andriessen. — (NL) Hr. formand, der kan naturligvis herske delte meninger med hensyn til spørgsmålet om — hvis der er spndinger mellen f.eks.
Mr Israel. — (FR) Mr President, at our last partsession Parliament adopted two resolutions, one con cerning Afghanistan and the other concerning Pakistan. tan.
Fællesskabet og De forenede Stater — hvorledes disse spændinger skal karakteriseres.
These two proposals have now been radically changed by the Commission and forwarded to the Council, and the Council has dealt with the proposals in question at two meetings.
Jeg udelukker på ingen måde, at der kan komme et tidspunkt, hvor Kommissionen eller Fællesskabet som sådant må erkende den mere politiske dimension af spændingerne, sådan som de måtte vise sige, og handle i overensstemmelse hermed.
Parliament's Committee on Agriculture and Fisheries has not succeeded in getting hold of the two amended proposals, hence no statement could be issued by Parliament on them.
Foreløbig er der ingen ændring i det standpunkt, som jeg på Kommissionens vegne indtog under forhandlingen under sidste mødeperiode, og Kommissionen stiler i velovervejet samråd med De forenede Stater at nå frem til en løsning på spørgsmålene og problemerne. Dette betyder naturligvis ikke, at Kommissionen ikke forbereder sig på en eventuel anden udvikling, men Kommissionen vil gerne i en god dialog forebygge sådanne konflikter.
I would like to request, Mr President, that you arrange that the Commission and the Council receive Parliament's opinion in order to ensure that we — who are elected in the European Member States, and, amongst other things, represent people working in the fisheries industry — also get an opportunity to state our views on the two proposals, so that the Council can incorporate them into its final considerations.
Formanden. — Hr. Kirk, jeg har indtryk af, at Kommissionen anser Deres spørgsmål for acceptabelt.
President. — Mr Kirk, I have the impression that the. Commission thinks your question is in order.
Formanden. — Jeg må bemærke over for hr. Gerokostopoulos, at protokollen for 18. juni er omdelt, også på græsk, og at det samme er tilfældet for de tre dele af Spinelli-dokumentert, så jeg tror, der har været tale om en misforståelse.
This is really astonishing, especially in view of the fact that Parliament did request the Com mission to report back to it within three months on the matter of aid to Afghan refugees and, moreover, Mr Haagerup's report did urge it to review its relations with Pakistan in the light of the incident that you all know about.
Andriessen. — (NL) Hr. formand, fiskeriproblematikken har været drøftet i lang tid, og så vidt jeg husker, er Parlamentet i de forløbne år blevet hørt mindst tre gange af Kommissionen om det oprindelige forslag eller de deri foretagne ændringer.
Mr Andriessen. — (NL) Mr President, the fisheries problem was under discussion for some time, and I think I am right in saying that Parliament has been consulted by the Commission on the original proposal, or the amendments to it, at least three times in recent years.
Da der i det forslag, som Kommissionen nu har forelagt, ikke er foretaget nogen væsentlige ændringer med hensyn til grundlaget for den oprindelige tekst, var Kommissionen af den opfattelse, at det juridisk se ikke var nødvendigt med en fjerde høring af Parlamentet.
As the proposal the Commission has now put forward does not make any fundamental changes to the basic principles of the original text, the Commission felt that, legally speaking, there was no need for Parliament to be consulted a fourth time.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok.
Mr Andriessen. — (NL) These matters certainly form part of the subject under discussion.
1-398/82) af Sieglerschmidt for udvalget til valgs prøvelse om indsigelser mod nye såvel som allerede prøvede mandaters gyldighed under rotationsprincippet.
As regards the situation in Afghanistan, Parliament called on the Commission to draw up a report on new measures
Endnu en bemærkning, hr. formand, der er mindst lige så vigtig, men som overvejende er af politisk karakter.
A second consideration, Mr President, which is at least as important, is largely of a political nature.
Sieglerschmidt én gang før, og det var i forbindelse med nogle ledigblevne irske mandater.
where the opportunities for the establishment of a common fisheries policy are greater than they have ever been.
Der var opstået betydelig tvivl om, hvorvidt en bestemmelse i den irske valglov var i overensstemmelse med Akten af 20. september 1976.
In view of the legal aspect of the matter to which I have just referred, the Commission had to act as it did if it was to seize the opportunities of the political moment.
I øvrigt skrev Deres forgænger, hr. formand, i denne sag et brev til formanden for Dáil i det irske Parla ment, og jeg beklager ved denne lejlighed, at dette brev mig bekendt indtil nu ikke er blevet besvaret.
I would add that the Commission certainly did inform the parliamentary committee con cerned, which was therefore in possession of the facts and able to discuss the matter.
Vi bør måske foretage os noget for at bringe dets besvarelse eller en stillingtagen i erindring.
I therefore feel that the Commission was legally entitled to take action and that this policy has benefited the Community.
Da jeg ved, at nogle kolleger har vanskeligt ved at drage dette skel, vil jeg komme med et eksempel, nemlig enstemmigheden i Rådet i de tilfælde, hvor traktaten kræver det.
This has happened only once before, and that was in connection with seats vacated by Irish Members.
Politisk kritiserer vi med rette, at Rådet i vigtige sager så tit ikke opnår enstemmighed.
There was considerable doubt at that time as to whether a provision of the Irish legislation on European elections was compatible with the Act of 20 September 1976.
Men ingen kan vel i alvor finde på af den grund at drage enstemmighedsprincippet i tvivl — også selv om taktatens bestemmelser ikke passer denne eller hin.
Incidentally, your predecessor, Mr President, wrote a letter to the Speaker of the Dáil, and I take this opportunity to express my regret that, to my knowledge, this letter has not yet been answered.
Derfor beder jeg Dem, mine damer og herrer, om meget nøje at iagttage denne skelnen.
We should perhaps do something to obtain an answer or an opinion on the subject.
Udvalget har af velovervejede grunde afholdt sig fra enhver kommentar vedrørende den politiske vurdering, for udvalget til valgs prøvelse har — det vil jeg ved denne lejlighed bringe i erindring — kun fået et meget begrænset mandat af Parlamentet. Det hedder i artikel 96, stk. 1 :
On page 9 there is a reference to the Gredal report on relations between the Community and the United States of America, and the standpoint of the Commission is summarized by saying that Commissioner Andriessen felt that many matters at issue between the Community and the United States over monetary affairs, trade and development were more technical than political in nature.
Parlamentet nedsætter et udvalg til valgs prøvelse, der skal forberede afgørelser om indsigelser mod valg.
In view of subsequent events, particularly over the pipeline saga, could I ask the Commissioner if that is still his opinion?
Det er nok bedst af hensyn til dem — specielt på tilhører pladserne — der ikke ved, hvad det drejer sig om, at jeg citerer den pågældende passus fra DIFE-listens valgprogram, der også er optrykt i betænkningens begrundelse:
The second report drawn up by the Committee on the Verification of Credentials concerns a matter which has been occupying the European Parliament for some time and one which has also been raised during plenary sittings on various occasions.
På grundlag af den personlige forpligtelse, de har indgået, vil de 81 medlemmer fra listen »Forsvaret af Frankrigs interesser i Europa« danne en samlet national gruppe.
The point at issue is the so-called — and I stress, so-called — 'tourniquet system' used by the list of the Défense des intérêts de la France en Europe, abbreviated DIFE.
Sådan er det, og derfor beder jeg også om forståelse for, at Deres ordfører her omhyggeligt afholder sig fra enhver politisk vurdering, selv om han vedrørende rotationsprincippet absolut har en politisk mening, der tydeligt kom til udtryk i udvalget til valgs prøvelse.
For those, particularly in the galleries, who do not know what this is all about, I think it best to quote the relevant passage from the election manifesto of the DIFE list: 'Because of the personal undertaking which they have given, the 81 members of the Défense des intérêts de la France en Europe list will form a permanent national group.
Altså alle 81.
'All 81 of them then.
I punkt 7 og 8 i begrundelsen er vist. hvilke resultater og tvivlsomme ledsageomstændigheder rotationsprincippet hidtil har haft.
Mr Andriessen. — (NL) Mr President, opinions may, of course, differ as to how tension should be described when it emerges between, say, the Community and the United States.
Hvad det sidste angår, inde holder begrundelsen et forslag til udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender.
I am in no way saying that a time may not come when the Commission or the Community as such will have to recognize the more political dimension of the present tension and to act accordingly.
Jeg tænker her på ting, vi til dels kender, nemlig at fortrykte udtrædelsesskrivelser har fundet anvendelse, og at de efter al sandsynlighed er blevet underskrevet, en rum tid før udtrædelsen egentlig skulle begæres — og nogle andre ikke så heldige ting.
For the time being, there is no change in the standpoint which I adopted on the Commission's behalf during the debate at the last part-session, and the Commission will endeavour, in close consultation with the United States, to resolve the present difficulties and problems.