natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Budgetudvalget har behandlet denne grønbog.
But it must take them further and concretize them in propo sals.
Men da en hel række spørgsmål stadig står åbne, har udvalget endnu ikke taget stilling til grønbogen og Kommissionens forslag, men beder i denne interimsbetænkning Kommissionen om yderligere oplysninger om bestemte spørgsmål og bestemte modeludregninger vedrørende bestemte forslag fra Kommissionen for at sætte Parlamentet i stand til entydigt at vurdere disse forslag.
Since when have we had to decide on something as volatile as the Commission's ideas in a matter of such importance as the future of the Community as a whole, the fate of the European agricultural policy — which is what this is all about?
Som grønbogen for øjeblikket ser ud, kan en endelig stillingtagen fra Parlamentets side ikke forsvares — medmindre en og anden er af den opfattelse, at det er så utilstrækkeligt og uklart, at det kun kan afvises, eller også må man give Kommissionen mulighed for at klarlægge de ting for os, som forekommer os uklare og utilstrækkelige.
I am therefore 100% in support of Mr de la Malène's proposal that we decline to deal with this question at the present time, that it be presented by the Commission in more concrete form and that it be properly debated in the normal and natural way.
Jeg går derfor ind for, at denne interimsbetænkning bibeholdes på dagsordenen. denen.
(Parliament rejected the request for withdrawal)
Clwyd (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, i forbindelse med pkt. 48 på dagsordenen har jeg en mundtlig fore spørgsel med forhandling om handicappedes sociale og økonomiske integration.
President. — Before putting Mr de la Malène's request to the vote, I have to hear one speaker for and one speaker against.
Måske De derfor kan gøre situationen klar.
I call Mr Lange, Chairmann of the Committee on Budgets, as speaker against, I suppose.
Nyborg (DEP). — Hr. formand, jeg føler trang til lige at kommentere, fordi hr. Lange siger, at vi er blevet anmodet om at tage stilling.
Mr Deleau (DEP). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the report which I am to present to you on pharmaceutical products has been put on the order paper for Wednesday morning.
Hvornår er vi begyndt på at skulle tage stilling til noget så flygtigt som Kommissionens tanker i en så vigtig sag som hele Fællesskabets fremtid, den europæiske landbrugspolitiks skæbne — det er det, hele sagen drejer sig om?
I have two duties to perform — chairing the European Committee and presenting my report to the House — and my job would be greatly facilitated if my report could be held over until the beginning of Wednesday afternoon.
(Anmodningen af de la Malene blev ikke imødekommet)
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your understanding.
Clwyd (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne komme med endnu en bemærkning.
Mr Deleau (DEP). — (FR) I should be much obliged to you, Mr President, if that could be arranged.
Deleau (DEP). — (FR) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, den betænkning, som jeg skal forelægge for Dem om lægemidler, er sat på dagsordenen for onsdag formiddag.
Mr Lange, Chairman of the Committee on Budgets. — (DE) You presume correctly, Mr President.
Men som det er Dem, hr. formand, og et meget stort antal af vore kolleger bekendt, skal vi onsdag formiddag inden for den europæiske komité for beskyttelse af små og mellem store virksomheder modtage repræsentanter for Fællesskabets ti lande.
I do not think the arguments used by Mr de la Malène to support his request are tenable. The President of the Commission in effect submitted this so-called green book prepared by the Commission to Parliament, ask ing for an opinion.
Ved andre mundtlige forespørgsler med forhandling for nylig her i Parlamentet er Kommissionen kommet med sine bemærkninger til sidst i forhandlingen.
Instead, the Committee has asked the Commission in this interim report to supply further information on certain questions and to provide some calculation examples for proposals put forward by the Commission so that Par liament can come to a definitive decision on these pro posals.
Det finder jeg er en utilfredsstillende fremgangsmåde, for meget tit vil vi gerne have at vide, hvad Kommissionen har at sige, før forhandlingen indledes.
As the green book stands at present, Parliament cannot reasonably pass definitive judgment on it — unless a member considers it so unsatisfactory and obscure as to be worthy only of rejection or thinks the Commission should be given a chance of clarifying the points which we find so unsatisfactory and obscure.
Kan De i denne situation træffe afgørelse om, at Kommissionen vedrørende denne specielle fore spørgsel afleverer sine bemærkninger, inden forhandlingen finder sted?
— the report by Mr Ceravolo, on lead contained in petrol, Item No 53, was not adopted in committee and has therefore been withdrawn from the agenda.
Jeg vil derfor mene, at Parlamentet bør fastsætte fristen til maj.
(The President read out the changes to Friday's agenda)1
Formanden. — Hr. Johnson, det kan vi ikke gøre, for vi skal have en betænkning, før vi kan sætte en frist.
Mrs Clwyd (S). — Mr President, with regard to Item 48 on Thursday's agenda, I have an oral question with debate on the social and economic integration of the disabled.
Så længe vi ikke har en betænkning fra udvalget om miljø- og sundhedsanliggender og forbrugerbeskyttelse, er det umuligt at fastsætte en ny dato (2).
This is in fact a motion of censure on the Commission for failing to carry out the recommendations made by this Parliament in 1981.
Formanden. — Frk. Clwyd, jeg kan ikke træffe afgørelser imod forretningsordenen. Kommissionen får ordet, når den anmoder om det.
President. — I would inform you that the Council has requested urgent procedure, under Rule 57 of the Rules of Procedure, on the decision empowering the Commission to contract loans granted under the New Community Instrument.
Politisk vil det nok være muligt at komme overens med Kommissionen om, at den taler på det rette tidspunkt.
The Council letter does not set out any particular reason for this request.
Men som jeg sagde, kan jeg ikke træffe afgørelser imod forretningsordenen.' ningsordenen.'
It merely says: 'In view of the character of urgency attaching to this propo sal, the Council would greatly appreciate it if Parliament could deliver its opinion at the April partsession. '
(Dagsordenen godkendtes med de foretagne ændringer)
I shall consult Parliament on this request tomorrow.
Formanden. — Kære kolleger, uden at ville præjudicere de politiske initiativer, der vil kunne blive taget i denne uges løb, vil jeg gerne komme med en kort erklæring.
On 11 March last, Parliament referred to committee the report by Miss Hooper, on behalf of the Com mittee on the Environment, Public Health and Con sumer Protection on containers of liquids for human consumption and decided that the Committee would report back within a month.
(Formanden oplæste ændringerne af dagsordenen for torsdag og fredag) (')
The committee stated it could not meet this time limit and asked if it might report back at a later date.
Formanden. — Jeg skal desuden meddele Dem, at Rådet har anmodet om uopsættelig behandling i over ensstemmelse med artikel 57 i forretningsordenen om afgørelse om bemyndigelse til Kommissionen til at optage lån under det nye fællesskabsinstrument.
Now I am concerned that there should be a proper debate on this particular question, Mr President, and I would like to know precisely how much time is going to be set aside for it because it has been squeezed down at the bottom of the page and a lot of my col leagues with an interest in this particular question were not even aware that this debate was taking place.
Kommissionen støtter denne anmodning.
So perhaps you could make the situation clear.
I Rådets brev finder man ikke nogen særlig begrundelse for denne anmodning om uopsættelig behandling. Man nøjes med at sige:
Other wise, if proper time is not allowed for this particular question, then I shall withdraw it and seek to put it in during the special debate on employment, since, as you know, the main point I wish to make with this oral question is the lack of an employment policy for disabled people.
Mens der kan rådes bod på politiske tilbageslag senere, kan dette ikke ske ved tab af menneskeliv.
Mr Johnson (ED). — Mr President, could we be clear, then, that the later date would be May at the latest?
På baggrund af forslagets hastende karakter vil Rådet sætte pris på, at Parlamentet afgiver sin udtalelse under mødeperioden i april.
President. — I will communicate that to the Com mittee on the Environment, Public Health and Con sumer Protection.
Vi her i Europa-Parlamentet har altid kraftigt fordømt enhver terrorhandling, uanset hvor og hvornår den har fundet sted.
President. — Mrs Clwyd, I can only say that your oral question is included in the debate under No 48 and so falls within the general allotment of speaking time for the Thursday, apart from the topical and urgent debate.
I vor nylige forhandling om situationen i Mellemøsten blev denne holdning igen kraftigt fremhævet.
Therefore how much speaking time is available for it depends on the priority political groups give to the subject.
Jeg vil i morgen høre Parlamentet om denne anmodning om uopsættelig behandling.
Mr Johnson (ED). — Mr President, as I understand the Rules, it says under Rule 35(3):
Som formand for Europa-Parlamentet ærer jeg mindet om dr. Issam Sarwati og hans arbejde for en fredelig løsning.
Mrs Clwyd (S). — Mr President, there is one other point I would like to make.
Den 11. marts d.å. tilbageviste Parlamentet Hooperbetænkningen for udvalget om miljø- og sundhedsanliggender og forbrugerbeskyttelse om emballager til flydende levnedsmidler til udvalget og besluttede, at det skulle afgive betænkning inden for en måned.
In other oral questions with debate recently in this Parliament, the Commission has made its comment at the end of the debate.
Udvalget har meddelt, at det ikke er i stand til at overholde denne frist, og anmoder om at måtte afgive betænkning på et senere tidspunkt.
Now that, I find, is an unsatisfactory procedure, because very often we want to know what the Commission has to say before the debate takes place.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er meddelelse fra Kommissionen for De europæiske Fællesskaber om dens reaktion på Europa-Parlamentets udtalelser og forslag (3).
In this situation, I wonder whether you could rule that on this particular oral question the Commission makes its statement before the debate takes place. Otherwise, we shall not be able to make a comment on the Com mission's explanation for its lack of action.
Johnson (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, kan vi så gøre det klart, at denne senere frist vil være senest maj måned?
President. — Mr Johnson, we cannot do that because we first have to have a report before we can fix a deadline.
Formanden. — Det skal jeg lade gå videre til udvalget om miljø- og sundhedsanliggender og forbrugerbeskyttelse. skyttelse.
As long as we do not have a report from the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, it is impossible to fix a new date.2
Alavanos (COM). — (GR) Jeg vil stille Kommissionen et enkelt spørgsmål.
(Parliament adopted the agenda thus amended)
) Frist for at stille ændringsforslag — Taletid: se proto kollen. (J) Se bilag II.
Deadline for tabling amendments Minutes.
Mere generelt: Er Kommissionen villig til at udarbejde og forelægge Europa-Parlamentet et udtømmende dokument om relationerne mellem EF og udviklingslandene på fiskeriområdet?
President. — Ladies and gentlemen, without wishing to prejudge any political initiatives that might be taken this week, I should like to make a brief statement.
Her drejer det sig om en uopsættelig sag.
Here we are dealing with an urgency.
Det er meget vanskeligt for Kommissionen at forberede sig på alle de spørgsmål, der kan stilles.
It is very difficult for the Commission to prepare for all possible questions.
På mødet mellem udvalgsformændene i aften vil man forsøge at udarbejde en mere tilfredsstillende procedure end den nuværende. Men jeg må bede Dem om ikke at insistere, for det er absolut umuligt for kommissæren at stille Dem tilfreds.l
This evening, at meetings with the chairmen of parliamentary committees we shall be trying to work out procedures more satisfactory than the exist ing procedures.
Hvad selve betænkningen af fru Le Roux angår, gav Kommissionen under forhandlingen klart udtryk for sin holdning til de forskellige forslag.
The process of bringing about a peaceful solution to the problems in the Middle East has suffered major setbacks over the weekend.
Hopper (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg tager ordet for at tale om to ting.
However, whereas political setbacks may well be recovered later, the loss of human lives cannot.
Skal jeg stille det nu eller bagefter?
In our recent debate on the situation in the Middle East this sentiment was again loudly reiterated.
Pranchère (COM). — (FR) Hr. formand, Rådet af landbrugsministre har udsat fastsættelsen af land brugspriserne for 1983/84 i fire uger.
Mr Pranchère (COM). — (FR) Mr President, the Council of Ministers of Agriculture has postponed fix ing the 1983/84 agricultural prices by four weeks.
Jeg vil gerne stille Kommissionen et spørgsmål: Er den besluttet på foranstaltninger, der kan kompensere for det tab, som mælkeproducenterne og fåre- og kvægavlerne lider som følge af denne forsinkelse?
I should like to ask the Commission a question: has it decided to take steps to compensate the loss sustained by milk producers and sheep and cattle farmers due to this delay?
Er den besluttet på at udnytte denne ekstra forsinkelse til at forelægge Rådet nye forslag på grundlag af den af Europa-Parlamentet den 10. marts vedtagne beslutning, specielt en forhøjelse af priserne med 7 %, afvisning af udvidelsen af medansvaret og nu — og det bliver særdeles påtrængende — iværksættelsen af en plan til nedbringelse af de monetære udligningsbeløb?
Has it decided to use this additional time to submit new proposals to the Council on the basis of the resolution passed by the European Parliament on 10 March, in particular a 7% price increase, a refusal to extend the coresponsibility levy and something which has now become very urgent, a plan to dismantle MCAs?
Formanden. -— Jeg tror, hr. Andriessen er parat til at besvare det første spørgsmål.
As President of the European Parliament I pay tribute to Dr Issam Sartawi for his quest for a peaceful solution. tion.
Andriessen, medlem af Kommissionen. — (NL) Kommissionen gav under forhandlingen i sidste mødeperiode klart udtryk for sit standpunkt med hensyn til fastsættelse af landbrugspriserne i forbindelse med de forslag, der var til forhandling i Parlamentet, og som til sidst blev vedtaget.
Mr Andriessen, Member of the Commission. — (NL) During the previous partsession on the firing of agricultural prices the Commission made known its viewpoint quite clearly concerning the proposals before the House prior to the vote taking.
Siden da er der ikke sket nogen ændring i Kommissionens holdning til Parlamentets forslag.
No changes have been made to our views on Parliament's recommendations in the interval.
Det forhold, at Rådet har besluttet at træffe sin afgørelse om landbrugspriserne på et senere tidspunkt end oprindelig påtænkt, er i sig selv på ingen måde anledning for Kommissionen til at foretage ændringer i sine forslag.
The fact that the Council has postponed a decision on agricultural prices beyond the date originally set is of itself little cause for the Commission to revise its proposals. Naturally I cannot predict the outcome of the discussions which have yet to take place.
I øvrigt håber Kommissionen, at det vil lykkes Rådet at træffe de nødvendige foranstaltninger i løbet af april, således at de midlertidige foranstaltning her, som det ærede medlem nævner, ikke bliver nødvendige.
Otherwise the Commission hopes that the Council will be able to take the necessary steps, sometime in April, so that the interim measures to which the Honourable Member refers will not be necessary.
Hvad angår nedbringelsen af de monetære udligningsbeløb, gælder den normale ordning, der har været gældende længe; der vil blive gjort et alvorligt forsøg på at nedbringe disse beløb, men naturligvis inden for de aftaler der er truffet med henblik herpå.
Concerning the phasing-out of the monetary compensatory amounts the previous arrangement still applies; a serious effort is being made to phase out these amounts but, naturally, within the timetable set for its accomplishment.
Maurice Martin (COM). — (FR) I sidste mødeperiode vedtog Europa-Parlamentet betænkningen af
Mr Alavanos (COM). — (GR) I want to put a short question to the Commission.
Andriessen. — (NL) Jeg er enig med det ærede medlem i, at det forhold, at Kommissionen af de anførte grunde mener at måtte fastholde et forslag, som Parlamentet har udtalt sig om — den er parat til også at gøre Rådet bekendt med Parlamentets over vejelser — er noget, der også ud fra et institutionelt synspunkt påkalder sig opmærksomhed.
I should like to ask the Commission if it is prepared to answer the questions asked in this report, and when, particularly the questions on fishermen of the Member States exercising their fishing rights under the agreements reached with the developing countries, on coordinating fishery matters with the European Development Fund, and on financing training centres in African countries.
Jeg forstår derfor særdeles vel, at det ærede medlem tager denne
In more general terms, is the Commission prepared to draw up and submit to this
Hord (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, i løbet af den sidste måned har Kommissionen besluttet at gå bort fra licitationsordningen med hensyn til smør- og anden eksport til USSR og andre adressater.
House a detailed document on relations between the EEC and the developing countries on fisheries?
Hr. formand, jeg kan naturligvis ikke definitivt forpligte min kollega Tugendhat, der er den hovedansvarlige for dette brev, men jeg skal gerne love det ærede medlem at videre give hans anmodning med en positiv bemærkning fra min side, i betragtning af det nyttige i med plenarforsamlingen at drøfte den institutionelle side af denne sag.
assure the Honourable Member that, while not being at liberty to make commitments on behalf of the Com missioner directly responsible, I shall, nevertheless, bring his request to Commissioner Tugendhat's attention with my recommendation, for it is always useful to have an exchange of ideas on institutional aspects with Parliament in plenary session.
Formanden. — Hr. Hord, også det er en af de ting, vi kun kan behandle tilfredsstillende under en anden form for kommunikation mellem Kommissionen og Parlamentet.
That being the case, Mr President, I feel it can serve little purpose to go into the matter at length under this point on the agenda.
Når det er sagt, hr. formand, mener jeg, at det vil være mindre klogt under dette punkt på dagsordenen udførligt at gå ind i selve sagen; man må overlade det til dem, der ønsker at deltage i drøftelsen.
Mr Andriessen, Member of the Commission. — (NL) On the last question from the Honourable Member, namely whether the Commission is prepared to make a full report to the House committee and, if necessary, to Parliament in plenary sitting on the pro gress of these discussions and negotiations I can give an affirmative answer.
Af disse årsager vil jeg nøjes med det svar, jeg gav på det ærede medlems andet spørgsmål.
As to Mrs Le Roux's report the Commission made known its views clearly on the var ious suggestions during the previous part-session's debate and has nothing further to add at this point in time.
Vi er blevet enige om, at vi kun vil drøfte de høringer, der er nævnt i Kommissionens dokument.
President. — I would mereley point out that the agenda for this week has already been drawn up.
Formanden. — Jeg vil bare påpege, at dagsordenen for denne uge er fastlagt, og jeg tror derfor, at bemeldte drøftelse må finde sted på et senere tids punkt.
1 think therefore that this matter will have to be dealt with at a later date.
Hord (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, tak for denne afgørelse.
Mr Hopper (ED). — Mr President, I rise to speak on two subjects.
Må jeg bare sige, at det er noget, Kommissionen har foretaget sig inden for den sidste måned.
First of all, in the report which Mr Andriessen has kindly given us it is possible that under the heading C 1 the English version has omitted a few words.
Det var formålet med at rejse det på dette stadium.
I wonder if the Commissioner would kindly confirm to us that it is the Commission's intention to make the study referred to in the second paragraph.
Formanden. — Ja, men det har ikke været til høring, hr. Hord. Det er problemet.
I have a question on a separate subject.
Boyes (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, i sidste nummer af tidsskriftet European Report er der en notits om, at et ikke-EF organ senere i denne måned foranstalter en konference om den såkaldte Vredeling-rapport.
Mr Boyes (S). — Mr President, in the current issue of the journal European Report there is an item to the effect that later this month a conference is being organized by a non-EEC body on the so-called Vredeling report.
Som bekendt gav denne rapport, enten man er for eller imod den, anledning til stor interesse her i Parlamentet.
As you are aware, whether one is for this report or against it, it did arouse a great deal of interest in this Parliament.
Kommissionen deltager i denne konference og vil ifølge notitsen være repræsenteret af hr. Ivor Richards kabinetschef.
The Commission is taking part in that conference and being represented, accord ing to this item, by Mr Ivor Richard's Chef de cabinet.
Jeg vil gerne fra Koràmissionens repræsentant i dag have en forsikring om, at hvis der på denne konference gives andre oplysninger end dem, Parlamentet allerede har fået, vil Parlamentet senere på ugen modtage en udførlig beretning.
I would like an assurance by the spokesman for the Commission today that, if any information is to be given at that conference other than what has already been reported to Parliament, Parliament will later this week get a full report.
Hopper (ED). — (EN) Til forretningsordenen, hr. formand. Kommissær Andriessen var så venlig at love kraftigt at opfordre hr. Tugendhat til at tale til os om cigaretafgiftharmoniseringen.
Mr Hopper (ED). — On my second point, I under stand that the Commission has decided to reject Par liament's opinion on cigarette-tax harmonization and that a letter has been written to you, Mr President, to this effect.
Jeg mener, at jeg dengang hørte Dem sige, hr. formand, at eftersom dagsordenen var vedtaget, kunne dette ikke ske i indeværende mødeperiode.
This is a matter of considerable constitutional interest to this Parliament.
Man kan spørge, hvorfor det optager mig så meget.
You might ask why I am so concerned.
Grunden er, at hver enkelt for at kunne deltage i konferencen skal betale et gebyr på 145 £.
The reason is that in order to attend this conference individuals have to pay a fee of £ 145.
Nu mener jeg ikke, at det er korrekt, at der skal gives informationer til folk, der ganske klart vil være repræsentanter for multinationale selskaber, for det er jo de eneste, der har råd til at betale 145 £ for at lytte til hr. Ivor Richards kabinetschef.
Now I don't think it is appropriate that information should be given to people who are obviously going to be representatives of multinational companies, because they are the only people who could afford to pay £ 145 to listen to the Chef de cabinet of Mr Ivor Richard.
Da det er tilfældet, forekommer det helt urimeligt, at man kan købe information, som Parlamentet ikke allerede har modtaget.
That being so, it seems totally inappropriate that information can be bought that has not already been given to this Parliament.
Jeg vil gerne have en forsikring fra Kommissionens repræsentant om, at intet nyt vil fremkomme dér, med andre ord at folk spilder deres 145 £, medmindre naturligvis Kommissionen er parat til at fortælle Parlamentet det i forvejen.
I would like an assurance from the Commission representative that nothing new will be stated there, in other words that people are wasting their £ 145 unless, of course, the Commission is prepared to tell Parlia ment in advance.