natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
påpege, at den tilladte vægtgrænse inden for Fælles skabet svinger mellem 32,5 tons i Det forenede Kongerige og 50 tons i nederlandene. Der er mange, som ikke er klar over, hvad det betyder for transit transporten, som skal overholde hver enkelt stats særlige bestemmelser.
The Community could have a common market for heavy goods vehicles, a factor of particular importance to manufacturers and hauliers.
Selv i miljøbeskyttelseskredse har man forlængst erkendt, at der er mange grunde til, at en harmonisering er nødvendig.
Finally, by eliminating one of the causes of distortion of competition, we could take a definite step', towards total liberalization of Community transport.
Kort sagt, hr. formand, så synes jeg, at dette forslag bør forkastes af økonomiske, miljømæssige og politiske grunde, og at Key og Hoppers ændringsforslag bør støttes.
What is more, the adoption of a single set of rules will make it easier to monitor traffic and to clamp down on infringements and abuses.
Formanden. — Hr. Collins, når medlemmer af udvalgene, som har førsteret til at gribe ind i en debat, også fremlægger synspunkter, som de ikke selv deler — hvilket er deres pligt — så må de afholde sig fra at angribe grupper eller personer.
As for the fairly widespread and warranted fear in some countries that increasing the maximum permissible weight could result in damage to infrastructure and the need for more expenditure, it has to be said that there is a lack of full and up-to-date infor mation on this.
Transportudvalget har ordet.
These are the benefits.
Og hvordan skal vi nå frem til den harmonisering, vi alle ønsker, f.eks. af mineralolie- og motorkøretøjsafgifter inden for Fællesskabet, hvis grundlaget herfor, nemlig transportmidlerne, bliver ved med at være så forskellige, som de er?
It has also been greatly influenced by the directives which the Council of Ministers issued in 1975, calling on the Permanent Representatives and the Commission to find a practical solution to the problem.
Og hvordan kan vi gå imod de motorvejsafgifter, der opkræves i enkelte lande, når vi ikke selv formår at fastlægge, hvorledes de køretøjer, der kører rundt i Fællesskabet, skal se ud?
What this means is that we have here a proposal for a directive which is partial and phased and which can be accepted because it falls logically into the general outline of transport policy.
Seefeld, formand for transportudvalget. — (DE) Hr. formand, transportudvalget har holdt ni møder mellem den 5. oktober 1979 og den 30. januar 1981, hvor vi har diskuteret en lang række ting, som nogle af dem, der ikke altid har kunnet være til stede, måske ikke er klar over.
We also have to assess the importance of the change proposed by the Committee on Transport in the motion for a resolution. I mean the proposal to allow national, regional or local authorities the right of decision to ban heavy traffic from particularly vulnerable structures.
Vi har hørt udtalelser fra fagfolk på mange områder, og vores beslutning er bestemt ikke ufunderet.
It is interesting to note that the same conclusions were reached in the Armitage report commissioned by the British Government, from whom of course came the major difficulties.
Vi har samtidig ikke blot påhørt udredningerne om de økonomiske og miljø mæssige virkninger, vi har også drøftet dem indgå ende og vi er — hvilket måske nok vil undre én og anden — nået frem til løsningsforslag!
Although this report does not agree with the Commission proposals as they stand and instead makes some recommendations which in my opinion should be given consideration together with those submitted by other European experts, it does state that the Commission proposals would reduce the harmful effects of goods vehicles, especially heavy ones, on the population and the environment. ronment.
Hvis enhver stadig holder fast på sit eget standpunkt, kan vi jo ikke komme videre i Det euro pæiske Fællesskab! Så kan vi jo lige så godt alle sammen tage hjem, for så har vi ikke opfyldt von mandat!
In finishing, let me say that the use of heavier goods vehicles will certainly bring significant and lasting economic benefits, resulting in particular from lower transport costs and less damage to roads.
Efter endt arbejde var der bred einighed i udvalget, og der var kun to medlemmer, som stemte imod betænkningen.
In the report which accompanies the motion for a resolution, I have made every effort to be objective in considering the various points of view which were put forward during talks with experts and representatives from unions and local authorities.
Denne enighed blev opnået, ved at vi gav os tilstrækkelig tid til at behandle emnet, og min kollega hr. Carossino har også for et øjeblik siden nævnt, hvor lang tid det faktisk tog, inden problematikken var moden til en endelig afgørelse.
As a result of these talks and the wide-ranging and thorough discussion they prompted, the Committee on Transport feels that it has made a definite contribution to the gradual attainment of a decision which — as I said before — is one of the most important and most pressing for the development of a policy on road transport.
Vi må altså forsøge at finde en løsning, og den beslutning, der skal tages, kommer vi ikke til at tage på noget letfærdigt grundlag.
Among the various arguments which have been raised against the proposal, there are some which concern the effects on the environment and safety.
Jeg går ind for vedtagelse af Carossinobetænkningen med kompromisløsningen 40 tons, fordi det er den eneste måde, hvorpå vi kan leve op til vore egne krav om en fornuftig europæisk transportpolitik på dette område.
These are arguments to which the general public is particularly receptive, and they involve paramount community interests which must be safeguarded.
Jeg vil gerne nok engang understrege, at det er nødvendigt med en harmonisering, og for hver dag man udsætter denne harmonisering, er det til skade for udviklingen i Det europæiske Fællesskab.
Finally, I want to say something about rail transport and the fear that the adoption of this directive might push more goods traffic off the railways and on to the roads.
Jeg må også henvise til, at EØF-traktatens artikel 75, stk. 1, litra a) nævner, ,at gennemførelsen af en fælles transportpolitik bl.a. afhænger af
It has to be admitted that this is a problem of some significance and with tremendous economic implications.
Albers. — (NL) Hr. formand, efter de indlæg, der er blevet fremsat af de foregående talere, som er formænd for udvalg, står jeg her som statsborger i det tættest befolkede land i Det europæiske Fællesskab, hvor vi er vant til 50-tons lastvogne på vejene; det
If we look at the major causes of pollution and road accidents, we find exhaust emissions and noise are to blame for the former, while the majority of accidents are caused not so much by the maximum permissible weight, as many people believe, as by overloading, driving too fast for the braking capacity of the vehicle, working longer than the statutory hours, lack of emergency services and the difficulty of carrying out more frequent and stricter checks on infringements.
Den herskende situation er kun skriftligt beskrevet og har endnu ikke været omtalt her, og derfor vil jeg gerne
However incomplete and inadequate this proposal may be, and although it can be criticized in some respects, its adoption would represent a major step forward. Like all
Albers land, jeg kommer fra, nemlig Nederlandene, svarer ganske vist ikke helt til det ideelle billede, fru Hooper skitserede, men det er trods alt et dejligt land at bo i.
Carossino compromise proposals, it requires everyone to make some concessions and, in some cases, sacrifices.
støjforureningen bliver mindre. Der henstilles også, at der tages hensyn til sociallovgivningen, at arbejdsvilkårene for chaufførene forbedres og først og frem mest insisterer man i beslutningen på overholdelse af forordning nr. 543 fra 1969.
The solution proposed by the Committee on Transport, on the basis of a proposal from various quarters, is to limit authorization for the time being to the type of vehicle which is most common in the Community: 40 tonnes on five axles.
Der anmodes om, at der træffes foranstaltninger med henblik på forbedring af trafiksikkerheden.
This will be a real help to the transport sector and will lead to energy savings and increased productivity.
På de betingelser kan det store flertal af min gruppe da også gå ind for en maksimal køretøjskombination med 5 aksler/40 tons, med henblik på forbedring af produktiviteten og energibesparelse, og i håbet om at antallet af lastvogne vil stige mindre hurtigt.
that the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection was unanimous in agreeing that alternative methods of transportation by rail and water should be much more actively encouraged, and this point is made adequately, I think, by Mr Carossino in his report.
Desuden indtager vi det standpunkt, at hvis der opstår større behov for vedligeholdelse af vejene, må omkostningerne i forbindelse hermed skulle afholdes af den transport, som er årsagen til disse omkostninger. Det er den socialistiske gruppes standpunkt.
The committee was also unanimous in supporting the proposals contained in Amendments Nos 19 and 20 dealing with speed limits and consultation with environmental groups.
Men jeg skal jo ikke her tale på Nederlandenes vegne, jeg taler ikke som nederlænder, men som ordfører for den socialistiske gruppe, som naturligvis har beskæftiget sig indgående med dette anliggende, fordi vi er klar over, at harmonisering bliver en nødvendighed, efterhånden som den grænseoverskridende trafik og transport vokser.
By way of conclusion, ladies and gentlemen, let me urge the House to adopt this proposal for a directive with the amendments suggested by the Committee on Transport.
Det er nødvendigt at de mennesker, som er beskæftiget inden for trafik og transpon, ved, hvilke normer, der gælder.
If this is done, it will at long last represent a major step forward for Community transport policy.
Hvis dette forslag fører til harmonisering af den tilladte vægt for svære lastvogne, kan automobilindustrien også udvikles bedre på dette punkt, hvilket er af yderst stor betydning for beskæftigelsessituationen, for vi ved alle, hvilken vanskelig situation automobilindustrien befinder sig i.
Mr Collins, Chairman of the Committee. — Mr President, first of all, I say"frankly that I think the basis of this debate is far too narrow, because although it is concerned with the internal economics of road transport, it is not about the economics of road transport in its entirety: if it were, we should have heard the rapporteur and no doubt other speakers tell us about the cost of these proposals to the public, to other users of roads and to the taxpayer in general.
Forslaget er også af betydning for tredielande, fordi de normer, vi håndterer, ofte over tages af disse lande.
But we hear nothing at all about that, and in particular we hear nothing about the cost to our entire architectural and environmental heritage throughout Europe which is imposed by these heavier lorries.
K.-H. Hoffmann. — (DE) For det første vil jeg gerne på min gruppes vegne tage til genmæle mod de nedsættende udtalelser fra hr. Collins.
President. — I call the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection.
Det burde være nemt nok at nå til en aftale. I maj 1972 indgik man en principaftale i Rådet; man var i princippet blevet enig om, at man skulle stræbe efter 40 tons for køretøjer med fem aksler.
Miss Hooper, Draftsman of an opinion. — Mr President, we would all like to live in a Utopia without any pollution, with empty roads, energy savings and at the same time low prices and high standards of living.
(Hr. Collins anmoder om ordet til forretningsordenen)
Our job here is to seek to strike the best possible balance in the interests of our electors.
Formanden. — Hr. Hoffmann, eftersom De har nævnt hr. Collins ved navn, må jeg ved slutningen af denne forhandling indrømme ham ca. 3 minutters taletid til en personlig bemærkning.
Now, a great deal of emotion has been generated by this particular topic of maximum vehicle weights.
Hvis hr. Collins ønsker at afgive en personlig erklæring efter debatten, står det ham frit for.
In my view the essential point is not that of overall weight, but of the individual axle weights, and in this respect it seems to me that the proposals made by Mr Carossino, after consideration of the recently published Armitage report, are quite reasonable.
Vi må derfor stemme for betænkningen af Carossino. Jeg vil gerne ønske hr. Carossino til lykke med hans betænkning.
However, as draftsman of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection's opinion on these proposals, I now wish to move the amendments tabled in my name, on behalf of the committee.
Det er en udmærket betænkning.
In the first place, however, I should say
Nogle medlemmer af vor gruppe lader miljøkravene veje tungt, efter min mening for tungt, fordi forslaget til direktiv indeholder en undtagelsesbestemmelse for veje, som ikke er beregnet til disse tunge lastvogne.
That will impose a cost, and that cost is not mentioned at all in the equations which have been presented to this Parliament, either by the rapporteur or, come to that, by the Commission.
Det vidner om ringe indblik i de reelle forhold at foreslå, at den tunge godstransport skulle kunne foregå pr. jernbane.
It is a cost that will have to be borne by the private citizen, by the taxpayer.
Så skal der først investeres en hel del i jernbanenettet, og det er usandsynligt, at noget sådant vil ske.
We know too, from the King report published in the United Kingdom in 1977 on the causes of serious gas explosions, that heavy lorries cause damage to gas, water and sewage pipes, and the cost of that also does not appear in these balance sheets.
Derfor støtter det store fienai i vor gruppe betænkningen af Carossino, fordi den netop giver udtryk for en vis kritisk holdning.
We know there will be damage to street furniture, and that will be a cost.
I forslaget til beslutning anmodes der nemlig om, at der foretages en undersøgelse af, om det er muligt at udstyre køre tøjerne med hastighedsbegrænsende anordninger, og der anmodes om at få fastsat en støjgrænse, således at
We know from evidence of the European Environmental Bureau that the enforcement of regulations on the tolerance levels of weights and the restriction of these vehicles to specific routes is difficult and probably impossible.
Hvis betænkningen kan vedtages med stort fienai her i Parlamentet, er der berettiget håb om, at Ministerrådet endelig kan nå frem til at fastsætte en ensartet vægtgrænse på 40 tons
The fact is, Mr President, that this proposal is misconceived because it is not set within the proper framework of an overall freight policy for
Der er mange af medlemmerne af transportudvalget og også af min egen gruppe, som i forbindelse med dette forslag har set bort fra varetagelsen af nationale interesser ved at gå ind for en fællesskabsløsning.
In the end there was a large majority in the Committee, with only two members voting against.
Det vil jeg gerne takke dem for, fordi denne løsning baner vejen for en aflastning af vejnettet.
Indeed this was not very difficult because we left ourselves a lot of time.
Lastvognstog under 40 tons kan i dag uden problemer omlades til jernbanevogne.
Mr Carossino has already pointed out how long it actually took until the whole question was ripe for a decision.
Mange vil nok spørge, hvilken betydning det har, at der sættes en ensartet øvre grænse for lastbilers vægt.
Let me emphasize once again that harmonization is necessary and that each day's delay is a day wasted in the development of the European Community.
Svaret er ganske enkelt: En ensartet øvre grænse giver større trafiksikkerhed, giver mulighed for at beregne omkostningerne ved vejbyggeri, giver ensartede konkurrencevilkår og fremmer samtidig energi besparelser og miljøbeskyttelse.
Article 75(1) (a) of the EEC Treaty states that the implementation of a common transport policy depends, inter alia, on the enactment of the Community.
Endvidere har den europæiske bilindustri og vejtransporterhvervet brug for ensartede normer for at kunne være konkurrence dygtige.
I think it is misconceived and I think it is misleading, because it fails to recognize the economic implications for other sectors of environmental and commercial life in Europe.
Samtidig vil ensartede EF-normer give den europæiske bilindustri et vigtigt konkurrencemæssigt forspring for lastbilproducenter uden for Fælles skabet, fordi ikke mindre end 57 stater efterhånden vil tilpasse deres nationale lovgivning til EF-normerne, eftersom de har erkendt, at disse normer også er både nyttige praktiske for dem selv.
It is inconsistent with other sectors of Community policy and notably, I may say, with the directive presently proposed by the Commission of the assessment of environmental impact, which says that statements of environmental impact should be compulsory throughout the Community for 'development projects likely to have a significant impact on the environment'.
Dette styrker afsætningen af lastbiler og giver anledning til oprettelse af tusinder af nye arbejdspladser inden for Fællesskabet, hvilket vi jo har et overordentlig stort behov for, hr. Collins.
This is clearly going to have a significant impact on the environment, and yet the Commission is not even suggesting that it should be subject to that kind of analysis.
Min gruppe går ind for, at alle mennesker i Fælles skabet skal nyde godt af social sikkerhed, velstand og personlig lykke, og person- og godsbefordring fra den ene medlemsstat til den anden bidrager langt mere til den europæiske integration end mange erklæringer, som vedtages af denne høje forsamling.
common rules applicable to international transport to or from the territory of a Member States or passing across the territory of one or more Member States.
Derfor må Parlamentet træffe de nødvendige transportpolitiske beslutninger, og én af disse beslutninger er indførelse af en enhedsnorm for lastvogne.
Finally, Mr President, may I say that these proposals are being supported by a ragbag of politicians who have simply swallowed whole the bait, the propaganda issued by the bigger sections of the road lobby, and in particular I may say that some, indeed most, of the British Conservatives will no doubt be supporting this.
Lad os i fællesskab føre en transportpolitisk foranstaltning, som gavner det europæiske fremskridt, ud i livet ved at stemme for Carossino-betænkningen!
They have often posed as champions of the environment in my own country, the United Kingdom, but I think the voting pattern that emerges and their speeches today will reveal their essential and very base hypocrisy in this.
Vi har diskuteret alle disse spørgsmål i transportudvalget, og de svar på spørgsmålene, som gives i Carossino-betænkningen, gør det let for min gruppe at stemme for.
Harmonization is necessary. Because it has only been stated in writing and has not yet been mentioned, let me point out what the present situation is: the maximum gross weight ranges in the Community between 32 · 5 tonnes in the United Kingdom and 50 tonnes in the Netherlands.
Derfor vil jeg indtrængende anmode Forsamlingen om at stemme for en øvre grænse på 40 tons.
I do not believe that any reasonable person can dispute the fact that there must now be harmonization.
Jeg beder Dem se bort fra nationale interesser i dette vigtige spørgsmål og stemme for en virkelig europæisk løsning!
What is more, even the environmentalists have long ago recognized that this is urgently necessary for many reasons.
Moorhouse. — (EN) Hr. formand, lad mig først takke ordføreren for en førsteklasses analyse, som jeg tror hjælper meget til at anskue dette komplicerede spørgsmål med tunge lastvogne i rette perspektiv.
In short, Mr President, I think this proposal should be rejected on economic, environmental and political grounds, and that the Key and Hopper amendments should be supported.
Ganske vist er det et vanskeligt skridt for medlem merne fra det britiske Labour-parti, og det fremgår også af deres ændringsforslag, hvorefter den britiske vægtgrænse på 32,5 tons skal gøres til EF-norm.
President. — Mr Collins, when representatives of committees, given priority to speak in a debate, also set out views which they do not themselves share — as they are obliged to do — they must refrain from attacking groups or individuals.
Selv om vi har al mulig forståelse for de specielle britiske interesser, må vi på det bestemteste afvise dette ændringsforslag, fordi det ikke bidrager til videreudviklingen af Fællesskabet.
This is something which, without wishing to create a stir, I thought it important to point out to you.
Vi mener imidlertid, at både udkastet til direktiv og betænkningen må ændres for at skaffe en endnu mere effektiv miljøbeskyttelse, og vi vil fremsætte ændrings forslag herom.
There is also the question of transport infrastructure, in connection with which we have just discussed Mr Klinkenborg's report: how can we possibly draw up a longterm road construction programme for the individual countries of the European Community if we cannot first succeed in defining the dimensions and weights of the vehicles which are to use these roads? This is another reason why a decision must be taken.
Deres formål er og vil være at beskytte offentligheden, øge sikkerheden, reducere støjgrænser og begrænse skader på veje og broer.
How can we harmonize, for example, road taxes or fuel oil taxes in the European Community — which we all want to do — if the factors involved such as the means of transport, remain as diverse as ever?
Og nogle af mine kolleger vil ligeledes fremsætte ændringsforslag.
And how can we oppose motorway tolls in various countries if we cannot lay down the characteristics of the vehicles using Community roads?
Årsagen til vor særlige bekymring er allerede blevet påpeget, nemlig den, at vi i Det forenede Kongerige har den laveste maksimalvægt på 32,5 tons.
Ladies and gentlemen, if I say all this once again on behalf of my Committee in support of Mr Carossino's report, then it is because I want to ask you to approve a compromise solution.
Og for ståeligt nok er der oprigtig frygt og bekymring for, at hvis man tillader de tungere lastvogne, så vil det skade miljøet og livskvaliteten endnu mere.
Those who wish to remain with an upper limit of 32-5 tonnes are dissatisfied because this will have to be increased somewhat, and others who have to lower their existing upper limit of 50 tonnes are dissatisfied because they now have to share in this decision.
Man kan næppe forestille sig, synes jeg, en mere
I hope we can agree on 40 tonnes — that is
Det var en politik, der gennem fem år blokerede den videre udvikling af socialforordningen, og som dermed var en hemsko for de sociale fremskridt.
We heard experts from many spheres and did not arrive at a decision lightly.
I dag, hvor forordningen også er i kraft i Storbritannien, er de britiske transportarbejdere blevet stadig mere overbevist om dens positive virkninger.
We not only listened to statements about the economic effects, the effects on the environment, but we also debated them and discussed them in detail.
Deres fagforbund forlanger i dag, at forordningen overholdes og kontrolleres strengt.
And we also — which may surprise some of you — arrived at solutions!
Moorhouse redegørelse end
Seefeld the compromise solution.
Vor betingede støtte er sikker, selvfølgelig under forudsætning af, at der ikke foreslås nogen stigning i størrelsen eller dimensionerne på lastbiler bortset fra udvidelsen af førerhuset af de grunde, der er skitseret i Carossino-betænkningen.
Our decision was not taken lightly. I plead in favour of accepting Mr Carossino's report with the compromise solution of 40 tonnes, because it is only in this way that our demands for a meaningful European transport policy in this specific sphere can be met.
Vi taler altså ikke om større lastbiler — overhovedet ikke.
President. — I call the Socialist Group.