natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg appellerer, hr. formand, både til Deres tålmodighed og Deres opmærksomhed.
I think it should be put on the record that it was due to southern Irish initiatives that there was no discussion and no debate on the use of plastic bullets.
Den uopsættelige procedure er i øvrigt ikke den ene ste, der gør det muligt at rejse spørgsmål her. Der er også de mundtlige forespørgsler.
Moreover, urgent procedure is not the only way in which issues can be raised here.
Og jeg tillader mig i første række at anmode gruppeformændene og alle medlemmerne om, at de i højere grad forsøger at bruge alle de muligheder, der findes i forretningsordenen udover anmodningerne om uopsættelig forhandling.
And I would urge the political group chairmen and all Members to try to make the best possible use of all the possibilities, other than tabling requests for urgent procedure, that are offered by our Rules of Procedure.
Jeg ved godt, at der er en almindelig tendens, som jeg også forstår, til at bruge den uopsættelige procedure.
I am well aware that there is a general tendency, and one which I perfectly well understand, to avail oneself of the urgency procedure.
Men erfaringen viser, at hvis man bruger den for meget, bliver resultatet i sidste række nøjagtig det modsatte af det, man ville opnå.
However, experience shows that if it is over-used, the final result will be exactly the opposite of what one had hoped to achieve.
Dvs., at de uopsættelige forslag måske ikke behandles, mens en anden procedure, f.eks. de mundtlige forespørgsler, i visse tilfælde ville have givet et bedre resultat.
Urgent motions will run the risk of not being considered at all, whereas in certain cases a different procedure, such as that of the oral question, could give better results.
Andrews (RDE). — (EN) Hr. formand, det forekom mer mig som nyt medlem, at der var tale om en lille misforståelse ved begyndelsen af denne forhandling.
President. — Mr Taylor, this will certainly be men tioned in the Minutes. However, by way of reply to Mr Hume, I must say 'that the deadline for tabling motions to be dealt with by urgent procedure is fixed for 3 p.m., as has already been pointed out.
Jeg finder det ikke længere usædvanligt, at Europas folk simpelt hen ikke stemmer til Parlamentet som
The agenda was drawn up in accordance with this and we cannot change it, I regret to say.
De er i Deres fulde ret til at sige, at Parlamentet, når det godkender en dagsorden, må være opmærksomt på det, der godkendes, på det, som dets formand har udarbejdet, og at det ikke nytter noget at klage over det senere.
It no longer seems to me extraordinary that, because of lack of flexibility in the procedures for voting and discussing these motions, the people of Europe simply do not vote for this Parliament. It seems to me that there is a very good reason why people have been switched off this Parliament.
Men man godkender ikke en dagsorden, hvis den ikke er fornuftig, og det var ikke fornuftigt at give afkald på at arbejde fredag og ikke at fastsætte
People come into the House; they make proposals; they develop their proposals; the dis cuss them among their groups; they go to enormous trouble, and at the end of that we haven't even two
Pannella et nattemøde.
minutes to discuss those proposals.
Det er godt, at hvert medlem husker på det, og måske har han under disse omstændigheder ret til at klage bagefter, men ikke før.
I feel that some measure of flexibility should be introduced to allow us to vote on the proposals that were worked on so hard by individuals, individuals committed to social justice and freedom, as we are in the condemnation of the use of plastic bullets in the Six Counties of the occupied part of my island.
Med hensyn til ideen om nu at åbne for sluserne, vil jeg ikke gøre det.
I do not mean to say that there was not a long debate on matters of procedure, but two hours and 27 minutes is not three hours.
I henhold til artikel 48, stk. 3, må en aktuel og uopsættelig debat vare tre timer maksimalt, mentor hver mødeperiode.
But the problem is as follows. Paragraph 4 of Article 48 says that, as soon as the debate is over, the motion for a resolution is put to the vote.
Men det hedder ikke, at det skal være tre på hinanden følgende timer.
Night sittings are usually scheduled for Thursdays but none has been scheduled for this part session.
Derfor henviste jeg til Deres opmærksomhed og Deres mulighed for at skabe en positiv situation for Parlamentet.
Given the mood of the House, and the interest shown in the various subjects raised under the heading of matters for urgent debate, I feel that we should consider the possibility of a night sitting.
Hvis vore dagsordener oversvømmes af en stadig større flod af anmodninger om uopsættelig forhand ling, kan vi ikke arbejde seriøst, og vi styrker i øvrigt den allerede gængse opfattelse hos offentligheden om, at vi spreder os for meget i vort arbejde.
But since Article 57 of the Rules of Procedure allows us to suggest a change in the agenda to the House — and I think the House would be grateful for this — I would ask you to be so good as to propose that we vote on the urgent things now, without debating, so that this three-hour debate and this partsession have not been in vain — in spite of the fact that Parliament is responsible for having shown no critical spirit in voting a poor agenda presented by the President — and so we can still say we worked properly.
Her i formiddag har vi rent faktisk brugt to timer og syvogtyve minutter på forhandlingen, for ved mødets åbning kl. 10.00 havde vi hele debatten om protokol len og andre ting.
President. — I am perfectly willing to put to the Bureau any practical proposal for a change in our working procedures.
Jeg vil ikke sige, at der ikke skulle være en lang debat om procedurespørgsmål, men to timer og syvogtyve minutter er ikke tre timer.
It is quite true that in the last Parliament there were frequent night sittings.
Derfor tror jeg, hr. formand, at vi stadig har ret til en halv time.
How ever, as far as this partsession is concerned, the agenda has been adopted by the House.
Det er tragisk, at vi ikke kan drøfte disse spørgsmål.
Mr President, I ask for your patience and your attention.
Men problemet er følgende: i artikel 48, stk. 4, hed der det, at beslutningsforslaget straks sættes under afstemning, når forhandlingen er afsluttet.
President. — No, I am verry sorry, Mr Pannella, but I cannot do as you ask. You tell us that, according to the Rules of Procedure, the vote must follow on immediately on the debate.
Men, hr. formand, vi har afsluttet adskillige forhandlinger om flere uopsættelige beslutninger.
We have had a joint debate on a whole series of motions for resolutions concern ing human rights; this debate could not be finished.
Vi har altså anvendt en metode, der er en smule underlig: vi foretager afstemning ved forhandlingens afslutning, ikke straks efter hver uopsættelig beslutning.
Consequently we are not in the position where a debate that has been closed must be followed by a vote. I am sorry, but that is the position.
I henhold til forret ningsordenen skulle vi, selv om præsidiet synes at være af en anden opfattelse, og det i dette øjeblik forsøger at tilkendegive det, straks have foretaget af stemning om Chile og de øvrige uopsættelige beslut ninger, hvor alt var klart.
You are quite right to say that, when this House votes on an agenda, it ought to pay attention to what it is doing and to what its President has prepared and that it is pointless to come complaining afterwards.
Tidligere på ugen var der nogen, der vedtog, at vi ikke skulle have møde fredag formiddag.
But we do not vote for an agenda if it is not a wise one and it was not wise to give up the idea of working on Friday and fail to have a night sitting.
Hvis vi var mødtes fredag formiddag, havde det været muligt at få mere tid til at drøfte disse sager.
It is as well for every Member to realize that, in this case, complaints are perhaps in order afterwards, but not before.
Jeg forstår de beklagelser, der er kommet til udtryk, og jeg tilføjer, at jeg deler dem.
Your idea would mean opening the floodgates now, and I simply am not prepared to do that.
Men den konklusion, der bør drages, er, at vi med henblik på de kommende mødeperioder bør udfolde en seriøs bestræbelse for at begrænse antallet af uopsættelige sager, således at vore forhandlinger kan afvikles inden for den fastsatte plan (').
We are launching the work of a newly elected Parliament, and I feel that we must all impose a certain discipline on ourselves.
Formanden. — Jeg beklager meget, hr. Pannella, men jeg kan ikke efterkomme Deres ønske.
President. — No, not today.
De siger, at ifølge forretningsordenen skal afstemningen ske straks efter forhandlingen.
Later on we shall see if any changes to the timetable have to be proposed during the course of the year.
Vi er altså ikke i en situation, hvor en afsluttet forhandling — og det er rigtigt — skal efter følges af en afstemning. Sådan ligger landet.
As of the moment, how ever, we cannot go tinkering around with the timetable.
Europa- Parlamentets forhandlinger
SCRIVENER REPORT (DOC.
Derfor havde vi ikke tid til at stille nogen ændringsforslag, f.eks. om at afholde nogle mødeperioder en uge senere. Vil De tillade, at der stilles mundtlige ændringsforslag, eller ikke?
I also am a new Member and I would like to support those speakers who deplored the failure to vote on the crucial issues which were on our agenda this morning.
på man kan konsolidere vort Fællesskab i den prøvelsens tid, det lever i, og hvor i enestående grad Fæl lesskabets finanser er udtryk for disse vanskeligheder. der.
In Britain a great number of the people who voted us here regard this kind of issue as one of the major reasons justifying the existence of this Parliament.
Formanden. — Nej, ikke i dag.
It is tragic that we cannot debate these issues.
Vi agter ikke at kaste os ud i unyttigt eller skadeligt plageri af de andre institutioner, men at bidrage til løsning af de vanskelige spørgsmål, der rejser sig.
Before that, I should like to say a few words to explain why resolutions put before this House were with drawn after the budget debate on the partsession and make a statement on behalf of the Committee on Budgets.
Cot (S), formand for budgetudvalget. — (FR) Hr. for mand, fru Scrivener vil på budgetudvalgets vegne udtale sig om vor stilling til de forslag, der er forelagt.
It would have been possible, had we met on Friday morning, to have more time to discuss these issues.
Inden da vil jeg gerne med nogle få ord forklare bag grunden for, at de beslutningsforslag, der forelå for forsamlingen, blev taget tilbage efter budgetdrøftelserne under mødeperioden, og afgive en erklæring på budgetudvalgets vegne.
We did not have the full three hours and I must say that, as a new Member — I may be stepping out of line — I question whether we really need to limit ourselves to three hours on issues of this degree of importance.
I det foreliggende tilfælde forekommer det os, hr. for mand, at den af forsamlingen i juli vedtagne beslut ning er klar og stadig har gyldighed.
I should like to thank Mr Langes and Mr Pasty for withdrawing their Groups' motions for resolutions after the long debate by the Committee on Budgets.
Vi håber, at situationen vil være afklaret inden næste mødeperiode. Udvalget venter at få forelagt et til lægsbudget og en ny anmodning om tilladelse til overførsler, for vi skal have en ny anmodning om tilladelse til overførsler for at kunne afgive udtalelse og dermed give tilladelse til frigivelse af de bevillinger, der er bedt om til Det forenede Kongerige og Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland.
In view of the present situation, it was important for Parliament to be united following the proposals by the Committee on Budgets, to say how things stood and to be able to give a clear answer to the precise question which Mr O'Keefe put on behalf of the presidency of the Council of the European Communities.
Under hensyn til de foreliggende forhold var det vigtigt, at Parlamentet i enighed om de forslag, budgetudvalget havde fremsat, kunne rette på tingene og give et klart svar på det konkrete spørgsmål, som hr. O'Keeffe stillede på Rådets formandskabs vegne. ne.
However, the conclusion that must be drawn is that at future part-sessions we must make a serious effort to limit the number of urgencies, so that our debates can be held in accordance with the Rules and within the period of time stipulated.
Hr. formand, den ånd, hvori budgetudvalget har be handlet erklæringerne fra hr. O'Keeffe og hr. Tugendhat og hele budgetdrøftelsen, førte til, at det for sit vedkommende ønskede at runde denne debat af.
Mr President, the spirit in which the Committee on Budgets looked at Mr O'Keefe's declaration and Mr Tugendhat's declaration and the whole of the budget debate led it to wish, as far as it was concerned, to bring the debate to an end.
De kan være sikre på, at disse bekymringer også er budgetudvalgets, og at det til sin tid — når det nøjagtig ved, hvordan situationen er — vil fremlægge forslag for formandskabet, således at ethvert medlem af forsamlingen, ethvert udvalg, en hver gruppe i god tid kan stille de nødvendige ændringsforslag og forslag til ændringer.
Believe me when I say that this concern is shared by the Committee on Budgets itself and that, when the time comes, when it knows exactly how things stand, it will make proposals to the presidency so that every Member of this House and every Committee and every political Group can table amend ments and proposed modifications in good time.
Denne generelle ånd, hr. formand, er præget af tre forhold, som jeg skal resumere i tre ord :
President. — The next item is the vote on the proposals of the enlarged Bureau concerning the timetable of part-sessions for 1985.
Ellers tror jeg ikke, det er nogen nytte til, at udvalgsformændene hver gang kommer med et didaktisk indlæg.
This general spirit, Mr President, is marked by three concerns that I shall sum up in three words.
Formanden. — Hr. Ducarme, artikel 66, stk. 4, 2. afsnit, i forretningsordenen siger, at ordførere og ud valgsformænd kan tage ordet.
Since no amendments have been tabled, I declare this timetable adopted.
Det første er den fasthed, som budgetudvalget vil udvise igennem alle tre måneder til forsvar for Parlamentets rettigheder.
First, firmness, the firmness that the Committee on Budgets will be proposing throughout the quarter in the defence of Parliament's rights — but not just in order to assert the need for democratic control, even if that in itself was enough to justify this position.
Men ikke blot for at understrege nødvendigheden af en demokratisk kontrol, selv om dette i sig selv var nok til at begrunde denne hold ning; også fordi det er vor overbevisning, at det er vigtigt under de nuværende forhold at sikre traktater nes overholdelse, fordi det er den eneste måde, hvor
Also because we are convinced that, as things stand, it is important to ensure that the Treaties are respected, because that is the only way of consolidating our Community in the trials it is undergoing — particu-
Må det i dette tilfælde være mig tilladt at sige, at indlægget fra budgetudvalgets formand var vigtigt, idet han forklarede de forhold, under hvilke nogle
Sir James Scott-Hopkins (ED). — Mr President, we did not really have time to put any amendments down. The calendar did not come around until this morning; at least it was not available to me until this morning.
Under alle omstændigheder er det skik — og i øvrigt tilladt efter forretningsordenen — at give ordet til vedkommende udvalgsformænd.
In any case, it is customary — as well as being envisaged by the Rules of Procedure — that the chairmen of the committees concerned are allowed to speak.
Dankert (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg er lidt forbavset over fru Scriveners ord.
The second word is responsibility.
Om Kommissionen tager ordet nu eller lidt senere, har ingen betydning.
We are fully aware of the seriousness of the situation.
Men jeg tager ordet som medlem af budgetudvalget, der forlanger, at ordføreren eller udvalgets formand påberåber sig bestemmelserne i artikel 36, stk. 2.
We do not intend to go in for pointless and prejudicial harrassment of the other institutions.
von der Vring (S). — (DE) Jeg vil gerne meddele, at budgetudvalgt var enedes om at pålægge sin formand at afgive denne erklæring.
Mr von der Vring (S). — (DE) Perhaps I might point out that the Committee on Budgets agreed to instruct its chairman to give an explanation at this stage.
Han talte ikke på egne vegne, men for .udvalget, for det store flertal i udvalget.
He was not expressing his personal opinion, but spoke on behalf of the committee and on behalf of the large majority of its members.
I øvrigt svarer det til traditionen — det er jo ikke så længe siden, hr. Lange udtrådte af Parlamentet, at man skulle have glemt det!
This is the traditional method of proceeding — it is not that long since Mr Lange left our ranks.
Forslag fra Kommissionen — Første led i præambelen : ændringsforslag nr. 18 og 2
Commission proposal — First indent of the preamble: Amendments Nos 18 and 2
Scrivener (L), ordfører. — (FR) For at lette afstemningen, hr. formand, vil jeg gerne forklare min stilling til samtlige ændringsforslag.
Mrs Scrivener (L), rapporteur. — (FR) To make debating easier, Mr President, I should like to explain where I stand on all the amendments.
Jeg går ind for alle ændringsforslagene fra budgetudvalget og imod samtlige andre ændringsforslag.
I am in favour of all the Committee on Budgets' amendments and against all the others.
Det vil lette det hele, at jeg har bekendt kulør på forhånd.
It will be easier now I have made things clear from the start.
Jeg er altså imod ændringsforslag nr. 18.
So I am against amendment No 18.
Efter vedtagelsen af Kommissionens forslag
It in no way wishes to hold things up.
Cryer (S). — (EN) Ifølge artikel 80 har medlemmerne ret til at afgive stemmeforklaring.
After the adoption of the Commission proposal
Scrivener (L), ordfører. — (FR) Jeg vil bare gerne have til sin tid — måske er det nu, måske lidt senere — at Kommissionen ganske enkelt fortæller os, hvad den mener om det, Parlamentet har vedtaget; jeg ved, at den gerne vil udtale sig i sagen.
Mrs Scrivener (L), rapporteur. — (FR) When the time comes — now or a bit later — I should like the Commission to tell us what it thinks about what Parliament has voted. I know it wants to say something about this.
Formanden. — Hr. Cryer, der kan ikke være stemmeforklaringer, fordi der ikke er nogen afstemning. Sa gen er sendt tilbage til udvalg.
Mr President, I am confident that we can give a favourable answer in October, during the next partsession, when we have received the supplementary budget — which will of course not affect the way our discussions on the content of this supplementary budget go.
Pitt (S). — (EN) Til forretningsordenen, hr. formand. Undskyld mig, hvis jeg mistolker Deres hastværk, men jeg mente, at vi også havde stillet ændringsforslag nr. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 og 17, som vi ikke har stemt om.
I do not quite understand the full import of what the Committee chairman said, but if this is to become regular Parliamentary practice in the forthcoming partsession, then the Groups have to be told.
De er ikke taget tilbage af forslagsstillerne, og jeg vil gerne have en forklaring.
Other wise, I think, there is no point in the Committee chair men explaining their views every time.
Tugendhat, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (EN) Det er en sag, hvor Kommissionen allerede har foretaget vigtige ændringer som reaktion på Parlamentets synspunkter.
Mr Tugendhat, Vice-President of the Commission. — This is a matter on which the Commission has already made important amendments in response to Parliament's views.
Vi har ændret vort oprindelige forslag fra forrentede lån til ikke-forrentede forskud.
We have amended our original proposal from interest-bearing loans to non-interest-bearing advances.
Vi har indarbejdet en henvisning til artikel 5, og vi har til sluttet os, at referencetallet skal være retningsgivende fremfor bindende.
We have incorporated a reference to Article 5, and we have agreed that the reference figure should be indicative rather than mandatory.
Jeg vil gerne tilføje, at det endelige beløb jo vil blive fastsat i budgettet og dermed af budgetmyndigheden, hvilket betyder, at Parlamentets beføjelser fuldt ud må iagttages.
I should add that the final amount will, of course, be fixed in the budget and so by the budgetary authority, which means that Parliament's powers will have to be fully respected.
På den baggrund for klarede jeg i mine afsluttende bemærkninger i debat ten i går, hvorfor Kommissionen har forbehold over for nogle af de ændringer, der sigtes på i fru Scriveners beslutning.
In these circumstances, I explained in my closing remarks in the debate yesterday the reasons why the Commission has reservations about some of the amendments envisaged in Mrs Scrivener's resolution.
Kommissionen kan derfor ikke for pligte sig til at overtage alle de nye ændringsforslag, der netop er blevet vedtaget.
The Commission cannot, therefore, undertake to endorse all the new amendments which have just been voted.
von der Vring (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg havde ventet, at der i overensstemmelse med aftalen i bud getudvalget var blevet stillet forslag om tilbagevisning af denne betænkning til udvalget. Jeg troede, fru
In this particular instance, I think that the speech made by the chairman of the Committee on Budgets was an important one, because he explained the circumstances in which certain motions for resolutions were referred back to committee.
Formanden. — Det drejer sig simpelt hen om, at for slaget til beslutning efter forslag fra budgetudvalgets formand er tilbagevist til udvalget. Som følge deraf er
Mr von der Vring (S). — (DE) Mr President, I had expected, in accordance with the decision by the Committee on Budgets, that this report would be referred back to committee.
Formanden mundtlig tilbagetrækning at sætte det, der står på den trykte dagsorden, ud af kraft.
No 2-316/153 amendments to this motion for a resolution, which has gone back to the committee.
der ikke grund til at stemme om ændringsforslagene til beslutningsforslaget, der er tilbagevist til udvalget. get.
President. — Such a referral has not been proposed up to now.
Castle (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, De har ganske ret.
Mrs Castle (S). — Mr President, you are quite right.
Scrivener-betænkningen og dermed også ændringsforslagene er tilbagevist til udvalget.
The Scrivener report and therefore also the amend ments to it have heen referred back to the committee.
Imidlertid er for slaget til beslutning af hr. Langes noget helt separat.
However, the motion for a resolution by Mr Langes is a quite separate one.
(Protester fra den europæiske demokratiske gruppe)
Mr Cot (S), chairman of the Committee on Budgets. — (FR) Mr President, bearing in mind Mr Tugendhat's answers, I should like to ask for Article 38(2) to be applied.
Formanden. — De er i Deres fulde ret til at rejse dette spørgsmål, men det er blevet besvaret. Jeg finder situationen aldeles klar, og vi kan gå videre.
I think the committee could look at these questions very rapidly and put the Scrivener report to the vote in the House in the light of them.
Det står på dagsordenen. Er det korrekt, hr. formand, at kujoner kan tage forslag til beslutning tilbage, der figurerer på den trykte dagsorden, bare fordi de giver nogle af os mulighed for at kræve en øjeblikkelig afstemning om Storbritanniens ret til at få sin tilbagebetaling effektueret? Skal vi være offerlam for de britiske konservatives fejhed?
It is on the agenda.
(Protester fra højre)
(Protests from the right)
Har vi ikke en regel i Parlamentet, der siger, at det, der står på dagsorden, skal forblive på dagsordenen, indtil Parlamentet bestemmer noget andet?
President. — We have therefore a request from the chairman of the Committee on Budgets that the report be referred back to committee.
Hr. Langes vil i øvrigt kunne bekræfte det.
(Parliament agreed to this request)
Lad os høre hr. Langes, eftersom han er blevet angrebet. bet.
I demand, Mr President, the right to have the motion for a resolution by Mr Langes, which is printed on today's agenda, moved.