natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ganske vist diskuteres formerne og vilkårene for et sådant politisk samarbejde: tilføjelser til Rom-traktaten, nye traktater, der kun skal omfatte de medlems stater, som ønsker at indtræde i en sådan proces.
However, I have a second preliminary comment to make on this Summit, and that is that, in my view, it is difficult to take stock of it without first stressing that it was a quite unusual example of its type.
Igennem nogle år har flere og flere taler, forslag og hensigtserklæringer i forskellige former foreslået en styrkelse af det politiske Europa, dog uden at en virkelig vilje nogen sinde har gjort det muligt at nå til resultater.
It would in fact have been almost surrealistic to have been holding discussions on Europe's future if no solutions had been found to the problems of enlargement, the need to increase own resources, or the integrated Mediterranean programmes.
I Milano nøjedes Europa ikke med taler og valne løfter om dette spørgsmål, her stemtes der, og en demokratisk afstemning er fremdeles den bedste fremgangsmåde, når en afgørelse skal træffes.
The fact is that this entire Summit revolved around a single question: towards what kind of Europe do we wish to make progress?
Et flertal af medlemsstaterne har ved afstemning udtrykt ønske om ikke længere at indskrænke sig til hensigtserklæringer, men til snarest muligt på en regerings konference at konkretisere den fælles vilje.
If called upon to encapsulate in a few words the spirit and approach brought to this occasion by the Heads of State or Government and the initiatives from various quarters, including the Italian Presidency of course, but also France, Germany and the United Kingdom, I would describe this Summit as one whose objective was the affirmation of Europe's identity.
Hermed er valget truffet for et flertal af medlemsstaterne, og det er godt, at dette valg kom klart til udtryk.
It-is for this reason that I, for my part, see this Summit in terms of three essential dimensions, and these will form the basis of what I have to say.
Afstemningen på Det europæiske Råd betyder ikke, at debatten er slut, og hindrer heller ikke videre per spektiver.
President. — I am afraid that I am not in a position to do as you ask. The agenda has been adopted and under Rule 56 can no· longer be amended.
Tværtimod mener jeg, at den for Europa åbner nye muligheder, som det bliver de tolv med lemsstaters opgave at samles om.
I would suggest that you raise this matter elsewhere in the appropriate form.
Europa må ikke glemme nogen.
We shall continue with the debate.
Topmødets anden dimension er det teknologiske Europa.
The first of these relates to political Europe.
Europa ønsker at fastslå sin evne til at reagere i overensstemmelse med de former, der er bedst tilpasset de tekniske og videnskabelige krav.
The Milan Summit was the occasion when notice was given officially of the Member States' will to progress to a new stage in the construction of a Europe initially conceived as a primarily economic Community.
Der kan ikke blive tale om politisk uafhængighed uden økonomi ske udløbere. Uden en samordnet indsats, uden fælles strategier for udnyttelse af Fællesskabets videnskabelige og industrielle muligheder vil ethvert forsøg på at
In an increasingly troubled international environment, the Community has demonstrated its ability to speak with a single voice on the political scene — on Afghanistan, on Cambodia, on southern Africa, on the Middle East, and even more recently on Central America.
Jeg slutter, hr. formand, med at sige, at Milano topmødet i mange tilfælde har fået en blandet mod tagelse fra iagttagernes side, og skal jeg tro kommissionsformandens tale i formiddags også fra en række af deltagernes side.
With regional crises breaking out in various parts of the world, with the United States and the USSR con-
Jospin om de egentlige emner og om spørgsmål, som er særdeles vigtige for Europas fremtid.
The Eureka project, the Commission's proposals, and the Esprit and Race programmes are all positive responses to this problem.
i Coreper, hvorved jeg ikke ønsker at diskreditere kvalifikationen hos tjenestemændene i Coreper, men de drukner i rutinen. Vi ville ønske, at regeringskonferencen forberedes af mænd, der i særlig grad har regeringschefernes tillid.
ducting campaigns to extend their spheres of influence, we believe that Europe must continue to evolve methods of making its voice heard more clearly.
Vi ønsker endvidere, at Europa-Parlamentets formand vil blive inddraget på passende vis.
Europe must have a real existence for these 320 million men and women who must be able to come into contact with Europe, to judge for themselves the advantages of the Com munity dimension in their everyday pursuits, whether they be in the field of culture, education, sport or civic life.
Klepsch (PPE). — (DE) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, det er blevet sagt, at sandhedens time er kom met i Milano.
Here, the European Council's wish to see implementation of the proposals submitted by the Com mittee on a People's Europe must be realized without delay.
Jeg tror, at det er et sandt ord.
Faced by these various challenges, Europe has set dates for a number of meetings in the near future.
I det kommende halve år vil endnu mere af den sandhed, der skal dominere i Det europæiske Fællesskab, åben bares for os.
These will either bring significant progress in their respective fields or they will be so many missed opportunities, depending on the attitudes adopted by the Member States.
Lad mig begynde med et par takkeord og med lykønskninger.
For the ad hoc committee on Eureka, we can hope for positive results.
Først vil jeg gerne takke hr. ministerpræsident Santer for hans redegørelse, for meddelelsen om hans hensigter, for hans rapport og ønske ham og hans regering held og lykke med den opgave, han står overfor i det kommende halve år.
For the Foreign Affairs Council, agreement now seems possible and we want to believe that it will bring a strengthening of Parliament's pow ers.
Vi er helt sikre på, at De vil gøre Deres bedste, da vi jo kender Dem fra Parlamentet og ved, at De er en udpræget euro pæer.
Finally, for the intergovernmental conference, I think it best for us to be fairly prudent in our expectations at this stage.
Jeg taler for en gruppe, der er sig bevidst, at seks af de syv regeringer, der har truffet og støtter denne afgørelse, støttes ihærdigt af vore medlemspartier.
The forms and practicalities of such political coopera tion are under discussion, it is true: additions to the Treaty of Rome, new treaties which only those States wishing to embark upon such a course would sign.
Vi tak ker dem for det og glæder os over, at de sammen med Frankrig er fast besluttede på at slå ind på frem skridtets vej for Det europæiske Fællesskab.
The Presidency and the Commission now have the task, over the coming months, of defining the lines along which such cooperation could be developed, in consultation with all those willing to take part.
Vi ønsker, at alle tolv går denne vej sammen, men kan ikke skjule, at vi er blevet en smule trætte af at vente på det langsomste skib i konvojen, navnlig når dette skibs kaptajn gentagne gange giver til kende, at han ikke er helt klar over, hvilken retning han egentlig vil slå ind på, om han måske gerne vil styre sit skib i modsat retning.
At all events, the Milan Summit has provided an opportunity to clarify the position, and that was absolutely essential. In the past few years there has been a succession of speeches, plans and declarations of intent proposing a variety of formulas for strengthening political Europe, but there has never been the real will to carry these proposals through.
I hvert fald er det vor udtrykkelige vilje, at denne regeringskonference forbereder afgørelser til topmødet, der kan fremme Fællesskabet.
In addressing itself to this question at Milan, Europe was no longer content to settle for speeches and vague promises; a vote was taken, and in democratic societies this remains the best way to reach a decision.
Et takkeord også til det italienske rådsformandskab, der har udfoldet store bestræbelser — det har vi i Parlamentet allerede anerkendt flere gange — for at fremme den europæiske enhed.
In this vote, a majority of the States clearly expressed their resolve to leave declarations of intent behind them and to hold an intergovernmental conference in the near future at which their common will can be formulated in concrete terms.
Også en tak til de regeringer, der ihærdigt har støttet vort anliggende at sikre Europa-Parlamentet flere beføjelser for at af hjælpe den demokratiske mangel, der eksisterer i Fæl lesskabet.
A choice has now been made by a majority of States, and the fact that it has been affirmed unambiguously is to be welcomed.
Hvilke punkter er det så vi ønsker der skal fastlægges definitivt?
At all events, with these meetings in the offing, a number of principles should be restated.
Der er for det første Fællesskabets beslut ningsapparat.
Institutional reform is not an end in itself but should be the instrument of a political will, providing the means with which to achieve the aims that we have set ourselves.
For os er tre punkter af betydning.
Europe must forget no-one.
Alle, som jeg har takket, ved, at min gruppe også i det kommende halve år vil stå på Deres side.
The second dimension of the Summit is represented by technological Europe.
For at sige et ord til vurdering af Milano : efter vor bedømmelse er Milano begyndelsen til en ny fase i den europæiske politik.
The Community has been con cerned to demonstrate its ability to meet the technological and scientific challenges of the day, and to create the most appropriate structures for this purpose.
Det er hævet over enhver tvivl : vi kunne have ønsket os et mere klart mandat til regeringskonferencen, end der er blevet givet.
The status of economic subcontractor does not make for political independence.
Men på den anden side påskønner vi, at man i Milano lagde en vilje for dagen til at træffe afgørelser, da det, som Fællesskabet har hårdt brug for, nemlig er afgørelser.
Without concerted action, without common strategies to develop the scientific and industrial potential of the Community, all efforts to achieve greater political unity will be in vain.
For det andet — og dette krav sømmer sig godt for os — skal vi henvise til, at det gælder om yderligere at tætne den demokratiske lækage, som Fællesskabet stadig har — det er ganske vist et Fællesskab af demokratier, men i dets struktur står det på mange punkter ikke for godt til med demokratiet.
I conclude, Mr President, by saying that the Milan Summit has received a muted response, it has to be admitted, from many observers and, to judge from the speech made this morning by the President of the Commission, some of those taking part have similar feelings about it. One can understand why.
Her drejer det sig først og fremmest om beføjelserne til Europa-Parlamentet.
This was not a Summit Meeting of enthusiasm at which obstacles were swept aside.
Vi skal som et resultat af topmødet i Milano først behandle spørgsmålet om regeringskonferencen. Vi ville ønske, at den forberedes af regeringschefernes personligt delegerede og helst ikke som rutinearbejde
In this connection, the support given unreservedly by the European Council for the Eureka project presented by France represents a real step forward towards technological independence for the Com munity.
Klepsch lige organer også er tænkelige uden traktatsændringer og bør inddrages i vore overvejelser.
Jospin that I wish to belittle the capabilities of the officials in Coreper, but they are up to their eyes in routine.
Man behøver blot at studere Parlamentets udtalelser om forslagene. gene.
That gives grounds for optimism, which I find a suitable note on which to end.
Når vi taler om kampen mod bureaukratiet, hr. De lors, så bør De ikke forledes til den misforståelse, at der dermed kun menes Kommissionens bureaukrati. Vi ved begge, at det vanskeligste bureaukrati i Fælles skabet i dag findes i den af Dem definerede gråzone.
We hope that Spain and Portugal, whose accession — as the Milan summit also made clear — constitutes a truly gratifying enrichment of the Community, will also take part in these consultations and that the Com mission will play an important part in them.
Disse folk gør alle deres pligt i fuldt omfang, blot forstår de den anderledes end traktatens ånd og for mål kræver det.
We also hope that the President of the European Parliament will also be appropriately involved.
Jeg forstår herved lige som min gruppe, at sandhedens time begynder med spørgsmålet: Hvem onsker egentlig at føre Romtraktaten til det endepunkt, som så mange topmøder har proklameret?
Mr Klepsch (PPE). — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, Milan has been described as the moment of truth, and I think this is correct.
Dette spørgsmål rettes mod alle medlemsstater og alle politiske kræfter i Fællesskabet.
The next six months will show us more of the truth which must predominate in the European Community.
Om målsætningen var der ingen tvivl.
Let me begin with a few words of thanks and congratulations.
Vi ønskede at få Europas forenede Stater inden for en overskuelig fremtid.
Thank you first of all to prime minister San ter for his statement, for telling us of his intentions and giving us his report.
En overskuelig fremtid er et meget elastisk begreb.
We wish him and his govern ment every success in the difficult task which lies before them in the coming six months.
Men vi er klar over én ting: vi anses overalt i verden som model på en vellykket, fri sammenslutning, som det er lykkedes at sikre mere end fyrre års fred.
We are con vinced you will do your best, for we know you as a member of this House, and we know you to be a dedicated European.
Hvad vi har brug for er også i fremtiden et frit men neskeværdigt system, økonomisk ydeevne, social ret færdighed og solidaritet.
I speak on behalf of a group which knows that six of the seven governments which took this decision and stand by it are firmly supported by our member par ties.
Der har været adskillige tilløb til uden for Fællesskabet at træffe institutionelle eller mellem statslige forholdsregler, der også skal tjene Europas enhed.
Anyway we want this intergovernmental confer ence to prepare decisions for the summit which can enable the Community to advance.
Min gruppe ønsker, at det hele sker i Fællesskabets regie.
A word of thanks too to the Italian presidency which, as we have acknowledged in this House on many occasions, has made great efforts towards advancing European Union.
Den er overbevist om, at vi europæere skal vogte over dette, og at vi bør gøre vort bedste for at føre Det europæiske Fællesskab mod det mål. der lig ger til grund for traktaten.
We also thank the governments which have firmly endorsed our desire to increase the powers of the European Parliament and thus close the democratic loophole which exists in this Community.
Hvad ønsker vi nu sagligt at få fastlagt?
Firstly there is the Community's decisionmaking process.
Vi ønsker for det første at gennemføre programmet for det indre marked, og jeg kan her kun tilslutte mig det, der blev sagt af Kommissionen.
Many sensible things have been said today on the subject, and I can only agree with all those who have spoken on the matter.
Derved ville vi ikke gøre Fæl lesskabet nogen tjeneste.
For us there are three points which count.
Vi skal tværtimod sætte det heel igennem.
We want a return to the majority voting provided for in the Treaties.
Jeg vil gerne tilføje endnu en ting : vi har brug for, at EPS videreudvikles til en fælles udenrigspolitik, der indbefatter de sikkerhedspolitiske komponenter.
. . . who seeks to preserve and further guide the Com munity as a whole along the lines and in the spirit of the Treaties.
El lers løber vi nemlig den risiko at blive underkendt som et Fællesskab af kræmmere, der kun tænker på økonomiske fordele og ikke har øje for den fælles interesse blandt de mennesker, der lever i Fællesskabet. bet.
All of you whom I have thanked know that my Group will continue to support you in the next six months.
Sir Fred Catherwood (ED). — (EN) Jeg vil også gerne takke Rådets formand og Kommissionens formand for deres fortræffelige indlæg, som opmuntrede os alle.
To give a brief assessment of the Milan summit: we consider that Milan signals a new phase of Community politics.
Alle i gruppen glæder sig uforbeholdent over, at man på topmødet i Milano vedtog de væsentlige for slag, som Kommissionen havde forelagt i Cockficldprogrammet om det interne fællcsskabsmarkcds fuld stændige åbning med hensyn til udveksling af varer og tjenesteydelser.
There is no doubt that we would have wished for a clearer mandate for the intergovernmental con ference than we in fact got.
Dette afspejler henstillingerne i Albert- og Ball-rapporten, Herman-betænkningen fra sidste Parlament og det program, som vor gruppe og vort parti har ført de seneste valgkampe på.
But on the other hand we concede that Milan revealed a determination to take decisions, and what this Community urgently needs is decisions. We may not agree with all of them, but without them the Community is likely to wither and die.
For i øvrigt at klare sig over for omverdenen er en nok så god handelspolitik ikke tilstrækkelig. Vi ønsker altså, at borgernes Europa ikke blot får et fremragende skriftligt grundlag i Adonnino-betænk-ningen, men at de konkrete foranstaltninger dertil også træffes.
Secondly, and this demand is most fitting, we must point to the need to close further the democratic loophole which still exists in the Community, for although we are a community of democracies we are in many respects not as democratically structured as we might be.
Vi vil også gerne se den kulturelle approach fremmet.
The first need here is to strengthen the powers of the European Parliament.
Men når vi indlader os på denne udvikling, ved vi, at der findes adskillige muligheder, som vi alle skal benytte os af. Vi har brug for tilføjelser til og ændringer af traktaten i fornødent omfang.
We must not cease to work for Parliament's right of co-determination; we are prepared to discuss a better consultation procedure and above all the powers lost by the national parliaments must not be allowed to vanish in that grey zone which President Delors so pithily described this morning.
Jeg overlader det til regeringskonferencens visdom at fastlægge det fornødne omfang inden for det spillerum, den finder det rigtigt.
And so my Group believes that the determination to obtain more powers for the European Parliament is synonymous with more efficiency on the part of the Community.
Men vi er klar over, at det også er muligt at fastsætte regler inden for den gældende traktat.
For no one to date can accuse this House of not fulfilling its role with great expertise and a great sense of responsibility.
Det ønsker vi også at udnytte fuldt ud.
One only needs to study Parlia-
Alternativet med vækst gennem underbudgettering, der finansieres ved hjælp af offentlig låntagning, er fuldstændig utilstrækkelig, både erfaringsmæssigt og i teorien, til at skabe det nødvendige antal jobs og vil ikke vare ved.
Following the Milan summit we need first of all to consider the question of the intergovernmental confer ence.
Det er erfaringen hos amerikanerne, der slog ind på den bane, og selv med Amerikas kolossale låntagning, hvor man nu betaler 180 mio om året i renler, er
We should like to see this prepared by people personally delegated by the heads of government and not in a routine preliminary meeting of Coreper. Not
Dette var det klare synspunkt, vi fandt i den nylige delegation til den amerikanske kon gres, med en uforanderlig arbejdsløshed på 7% trods den vækst, de har haft.
When we talk of struggling against bureaucracy you should not, President Delors, make the mistake of thinking that we mean only the Commission bureaucracy. We both know that the most ponderous bureaucracy in this Community lies in the grey zone you have defined.
Vi forstår godt bekymringen blandt dem i folketinget og under huset, der er dybt mistroiske over for ethvert indgreb i deres suverænitet.
The question is addressed to all the Member States and all political bodies in the Community. There is no doubt as to our objective.
Ingen britisk eller dansk regering ville derfor ønske at vække deres mistro uden de mest tvingende årsager.
We want to create the united states of Europe within the foreseeable future.
Vi har den største sympati for dem i vor gruppe, der afspejler de følelser.
The foreseeable future is a very elastic period of time.
Flertallet i gruppen er lige så opsat på at værne om vore to landes vitale nationale interesser, men det er et spørgsmål om, hvilke vitale nationale interesser og hvordan de bedst kan varetages.
But we are clear about one thing: throughout the world we are regarded as the model of a successful association of free members who have managed to preserve peace for forty years.
Cockfield-programmct er således hjørnestenen i vor ckspansionspolitik.
What we need for the future too is an order rooted in freedom and human dignity, economic capability, social justice and solidarity.
Det kan slet ikke sammenlignes med noget alternativ.
This can be achieved under the Community umbrella.
Lykkes det ikke at få et virke ligt fælles marked, vil det være en katastrofe for den økonomiske og sociale struktur i alle medlemsstater, og det vil lægge enorme pres på vort sociale system.
There have been a number of institutional or bilateral government initiatives taken outside the Community aimed at securing the unity of Europe.
Hvis vi ikke har en effektiv beslutningsprocedure, vil vi til slut blive stater, der er politisk afhængige af en supermagt.
My Group would like to see everything done beneath the Community umbrella.
Vi vil hver især rangere langt bag japanerne med hen syn til vor indflydelse i internationale anliggender.
It is convinced that we Europeans must guard this umbrella and do our best to bring the European Community to fulfilment of the objective which underlies the Treaties.
Vi er selvfølgelig blevet enige med vore regerninger om, at hvis man på nogen måde kan komme videre med Cockfield-programmet uden den forsinkelse, der er nødvendig til de nationale parlamenters ratifikation af en traktatændring, ville det selvfølgelig spare en masse tid.
In addition, if we do not wish to lose out in this world in matters of science, research, technology, environmental protection — in short everything which President Delors has today called the technological community — we must be given the necessary powers. Quite simply we need to have them.
Men flertallet i Milano følte klart, at en traktatændring skulle overvejes, og den mulighed ser nu højst usandsynlig ud.
The Community abounds in valuable studies which substantiate this, and I can only endorse their conclusions, but so far there have been no actions towards this end.
Vi mener, at Milano er et væsentligt skridt mod økonomisk opsving, og at det er et langt skridt i ret ning af at fastlægge den beslutningsprocedure, der er nødvendig for at værne om alle vore vitale interesser — økonomiske, sociale og politiske.
Otherwise we risk being dismissed as a community of traders concerned only with economic advantage but not with the overall interests of the people living in that community.
Vi ønsker alle, at Cockfield-programmet lykkes, og vi ønsker at finde en måde til at undgå, at det tilbageholdes af de tusinde silkesnore af hævdvundne interesser.
We hope, there fore, that the people's Europe will receive more than the excellent written basis provided by the Adonnino report, and that concrete measures will also be taken.
Det er virkelig et spørgsmål om den bedste måde at gøre det på.
We should also like to see greater emphasis on the cultural approach.