natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Med Deres tilladelse, hr. formand, og under hensyntagen til det særlige ansvar, fru van den Heuvel henviste til, er jeg ikke villig til at afgive et sådant løfte her i Parlamentet i aften. Og jeg mener, at jeg så befinder mig i
The important thing — politically — from the point of view of the SMUs is the elimination of distortions of competition which work to their disadvantage, less red tape and bureau cratic interference in all its forms and a simpler tax structure — including, wherever possible, a fairer taxation system.
Da jeg i aften alligevel ikke kan tage de talrige ideer op i enkeltheder, beder jeg Dem bære over med mig, hvis jeg endnu en gang går ind på de politiske aspekter ved politikken for små og mellemstore virksomheder.
It therefore seems to me to be all the more important to make money available to people wishing to set up in business on their own.
Vi glæder os især over, at hr. Deleaus betænkning intensivt kommer ind på de aspekter ved politikken for små og mellemstore virksomheder, der går ud over det rent faglige.
I would just mention here a proposal — in which I take a particularly lively interest — made by Mr Schnitker, who unfortunately cannot be here this evening.
Netop 70'ernes konjunkturkrise og stagnation har vist, hvor meget Det europæiske Fællesskabs kriseramte økonomier — og dermed endog nogle medlemsstaters overlevelsesevne
Why, after all is said and done, should there be this discrimination between those who have the courage to set up in business on their own and those who wish to study at the taxpayers' expense and later get a cosy job in the civil service?
— afhænger af tilstedeværelsen af et bredt lag af leve dygtige, effektive, tilpasningsdygtige og konkurrence villige små og mellemstore virksomheder.
President. — According to the agenda approved by Parliament on Monday, this oral question forms part of the debate on the two reports.
Desto vigtigere synes starthjælpen til selvstændig virksomhed at være.
particular, to make the money available more quickly.
Jeg nævner her et forslag, der ligger mig særlig på hjerte, fra medlemmet Schnitker, der desværre ikke kan være her i aften.
There is, after all, no point in a person having to wait until he is 50 years old until he has saved enough money to be able to set up in business on his own account.
Han krævede for nylig, at de yngre håndværksmestre skulle have den samme støtte, som medlemsstaternes universitetsstuderende direkte eller indirekte får ydet fra det offentlige.
He should be given assistance to make the move in the prime of his life, i.e. when he is 35 or 40 years old.
Til syvende og sidst har det ikke noget formål, hvis den selvstændige først som halvtredsårig har opfyldt sit spareprogram til at blive selvstændig. Han skal sættes i stand hertil i sine bedste år, dvs. i en alder af 35 — 40 år.
I have no intention of appearing to be blasphemous, but I would point out that, from the administrative point of view, the episode he was referring to was a classic case of a negative conflict of responsibilities, in that no one took respon sibility for the child, which was consequently left to its own devices.
Der må ikke opstå forkerte forestillinger om aktionsområdet for fællesskabsforanstaltninger.
Mr von der Vring. — (DE) Mr President, you cannot base your opinion on the draft agenda.
Jeg vil ikke være blasfemisk, men dog henvise til, at der her organisationsteknisk set synes at foreligge et klassisk tilfælde af negativ kompetencekonflikt.
We insist therefore that Mr Linkohr be given another opportunity to put his questions to the Commission, and that the Commission should reply to them.
Fællesskabet kan kun give forslag og ideer som supplement til medlemsstaternes foranstaltninger for at sikre, at prioriteterne i medlemsstaternes økono miske politik fuldt ud tager hensyn til de små og mellemstore virksomheders interesser, og dermed at rammebetingelserne udformes bedst muligt til gavn for dem.
I can assure Mr Notenboom that the Commission is conscious of neither a negative nor a positive conflict of responsibilities, in the form of a tug-of-war baby. On the contrary, Mr Davignon and I are collaborating closely — and so far with success, we feel — with a view to exercising our dual responsibilities to the benefit of small and mediumsized undertakings.
Jeg kan forsikre ham om, at der i Kommissionen hverken findes denne negative kompetencekonflikt eller den positive i den forstand, at barnet bliver hugget over.
President. — Let me repeat that the debate on the two reports produced by Mrs Walz and Mrs Lizin includes an oral question by Mr Linkohr and others to the Council.
Atomkraftværker—
Nuclear power stations — Safety policy (continuation) ation)
Sikkerhedspolitik (fortsættelse)
Mr Linkohr. — (DE) I quite see that we are now getting into difficulties, and I am not the kind of person who would wish to hold up a debate in a case like this.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er fortsat forhandling om
President. — The next item is the continuation of the joint debate on two reports:
Netop af denne grund forsøger vi også inden for overskuelig tid at nedsætte mængden af grænse bomme i Fællesskabet til et niveau, som vi har det i dag mellem Benelux-staterne.
I should like to have it placed on the record that, in my capacity as questioner, I regard the Rules of Procedure as having been broken by the action of the Bureau and that I shall, if necessary, be coming back to this point.
— betænkning af Lizin for energi- og forskningsud valget om atomsikkerhedspolitik i Europa (dok. 1-852/81).
— report (Doc.
Lad mig henvise til endnu et punkt, der ligger mig særlig på hjerte, nemlig spørgsmålet om at gøre det lettere at blive selvstændig erhvervsdrivende.
To avoid any misunderstandings, and in view of the lateness of the hour, I shall withdraw my protest — temporarily at least — but I should like to ask the Bureau to investigate the matter.
Linkohr. — (DE) Jeg henviser til proceduren i henhold til forretningsordenens artikel 42, stk. 4, der vedrører mundtlig forespørgsel med forhandling.
Mr Forth. — I am very disappointed that Mr Linkohr has relinquished his right to speak because I agree with him that under Rule 42 (4) of the Rules of Procedure — which I invite you, Mr President, to read, and others as well — he is entitled to speak.
Formanden. — I forretningsordenens stk. 1, afsnit 4, står følgende:
These questions shall not be included in the agenda of a partsession if, that agenda already provides for the subject to be discussed with the participation of the insti­tutions concerned; they will, however, be included in the debate.
Ifølge denne råder en forespørger over højst 10 minutter til begrundelse. Et medlem fra den adspurgte institution, altså Rådet, besvarer forespørgslen.
tion contained in my report of 13 January 1976 on the conditions for a Community policy on the siting of nuclear power stations taking account of their accept­ability for the population.
Formanden. — I henhold til den dagsorden, som godkendtes af Parlamentet i mandags, indgår denne mundtlige forespørgsel i forhandlingen om de to betænkninger.
He went on to say that there was a broad measure of agreement between our report and the work the Commission was doing, and I hope that that still holds true today.
Denne mundtlige forespørgsel indgår i forhandlingen om betænkningerne af Walz og Lizin.
This oral question is included in the debate on the Walz and Lizin reports.
De fremførte indvendinger vil blive forelagt præsidiet, som eventuelt vil høre udvalget for forretningsordenen herom.
The objections which have been raised will be put to the Bureau which will, if appro­priate, consult the Committee on the Rules of Proce­dure and Petitions on the matter.
Walz, ordfører. — (DE) Hr. formand, det spørgsmål, som hr. Linkohr stillede, bør virkelig undersøges.
Mrs Walz, rapporteur. — (DE) Mr President, the question Mr Linkohr has brought up really ought to be investigated.
Vi har gjort, hvad vi altid har fået besked på: Vi fremlagde en hel buket, for at en fornuftig debat kan finde sted.
We were supposed yesterday afternoon to present the energy package and we have done what we are always being asked to do: we have presented an entire package so that a sensible debate can be conducted on the basis of it.
Selv om jeg ville protestere i går kl. 18.00 — den daværende formand overså det med vilje — så er det vores tur i dag kl. 21.45.
Although I wanted to protest at 6 p. m. yesterday — and the President at the time deliberately overlooked it — our turn has now come up at 9-45 p. m. today.
Dette giver ikke fortrinsret til særlige krav om taletid. De fremførte indsigelser vil blive forelagt præsidiet.
That is really not the proper way to behave towards colleagues who have put in so much work, and I would ask that this question ...
Linkohr. — (DE) Jeg kan godt se, at vi nu kommer i vanskeligheder, og jeg hører ikke til dem, der i sådanne tilfælde vil standse forhandlingen, men her foreligger der en klar forretningsordensbestemmelse.
Mrs von Alemann's objec­tions were the same as those expressed in my previous report and in Sections (c) and (d) of Mr Colla's motion for a resolution, i. e. that the governments were not taking sufficient account of Articles 37 and 41 of the Euratom Treaty and that the Community consultation procedure had so far failed to reach a satisfactory outcome.
. . . undersøges nøje i præsidiet.
.... be given careful consideration by the Bureau.
Hvis man skal tale om eftermiddagen, er det urimeligt, at man først kommer til dagen efter lidt før kl. 22.00.
If you are down to speak on a particular afternoon, it is intolerable to be called at last at almost 10 p. m. on the next day.
Jeg tror, at præsidiet må gribe til forholdsregler for at bremse strømmen af forslag til forretningsordenen — og også forskellige andre foranstaltninger — ellers gør vi os med tiden latterlige som Parlament.
I think it is up to the Bureau to take steps here to stem the flood of procedural motions and to take other measures as well — otherwise we shall eventually be making a laughing-stock of ourselves.
Undskyld, at jeg taler så uforbeholdent!
I beg your pardon for being so blunt.
Jeg ønsker, at der i protokollen anføres, at jeg som forespørger anser forretningsordenen for brudt på grund af præsidiets fremgangsmåde, og at jeg i givet fald vil komme tilbage til spørgsmålet. Det er ganske klart fastlagt, at forespørgeren, ligesom ordføreren, har mulighed for at stille et spørgsmål.
More than two years later, we had the report pro­duced by Mrs von Alemann, in which she noted that these shortcomings still persisted with regard to the application of Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty — or rather, with regard to the Member States' compliance with the relevant provisions.
Ellers er hele fremgangsmåden jo meningsløs, for så vil det ikke mere være noget spørgsmål, men en skriftlig fore spørgsel med svar.
The problems remained the same, and had in fact got worse as a result of the planning that had gone on in the meantime and even of the construction of power stations in border regions.
Energi- og forskningsudvalget fremlægger denne betænkning i en afkortet form. Den består ikke af andet end forslag til beslutning dok.
The Committee on Energy and Research hereby presents a abbreviated report, which in fact comprises the motion for a resolution (Doc.
1-29/80 af hr. Colla og fem andre underskrivere af 13. februar 1981.
1-29/80) tabled by Mr Colla and five others on 13 February 1981.
Forslaget blev overtaget af vort udvalg uden den ringeste ændring.
The resolution in question was adopted by the committee without the slightest alteration.
Det sker ikke særlig ofte, og derfor vil vi gerne, ønske ophavsmændene til lykke.
That kind of thing does not happen very often, and we should therefore like to congratulate the six signatories on this achieve­ment.
Jeg trækker gerne min protest — i hvert fald fore løbig — tilbage for at undgå eventuelle misforståelser, også i betragtning af det sene tidspunkt, men jeg vil bede præsidiet om at tage sig af sagen.
The thinking behind the motion for a resolution is based on two resolutions adopted by the European Parliament.
Forslaget til beslutning går i betragtningerne ud fra to parlamentsbeslutninger.
What the committee is calling for goes far beyond this.
For det første må nævnes min betænkning af 13. januar 1976 vedrørende forudsætningerne for en fælles politik for placering af atomkraftværker under rimelig hensyntagen til befolk ningen.
What we want to see is not just an undertaking to enter into consultations, but a proper arbitration procedure.
Walz overensstemmelse mellem vor betænkning og de opgaver, Kommissionen var gået i gang med, og jeg håber, at denne overensstemmelse stadig findes i dag.
I shall then be brief: the report we are debating today was in fact based on a resolution which considered the dispersion of the Community's nuclear safeguards departments.
Det teknisk-sundhedsmæssige sikkerhedsaspekt har naturligvis ligeledes været genstand for vore overvejelser.
What is in fact striking is that during the development of the nuclear industry in Europe safety was a matter of no great concern.
Uden den størst mulige tekniske sikkerhed, set fra vort nuværende niveau, kan det ikke kræves af nogen befolkning, at den skal finde sig i atomkraft værker i nærheden.
From the point of view of these two phases in the spread of nuclear power, thinking on safety has not been adapted to the second, and safety itself has not kept pace with the industrial development of nuclear power.
Størst mulig sikkerhed kan natur ligvis ikke betyde absolut sikkerhed.
Of course, our deliberations also covered the technical and health safety aspects.
En absolut sikkerhed findes der ikke for noget og for nogen.
Without the best possible standard of technical safety, bearing in mind the current state of the art, no population can reasonably be expected to put up with nuclear power stations in their neighbourhood.
På grund af bestemmelsen i artikel 130 i EØF-traktaten forekommer de dér nævnte kriterier — som nævnt i punkt 2 i forslaget til beslutning — påkrævet for Den europæiske Investeringsbank.
Absolute, cast-iron safety simply does not exist, but it would seem that, according to the provisions of Article 130 of the EEC Treaty, the criteria set out therein apply likewise to the European Investment Bank, as paragraph 2 of our motion for a resolution says.
Det er denne institutions opgave at bidrage til en harmonisk og gnidningsløs udvikling af det fælles marked i Fællesskabets interesse.
It is up to the European Investment Bank to make a contribution towards a balanced and smooth development of the common market in the interests of the Community.
Medvirken ved finansiering af grænse nære atomkraftværker kan uden tvivl anses som en sådan opgave. Men denne udvikling ville næppe forløbe harmonisk og bestemt ikke gnidningsfrit, hvis der ikke fandtes nogen fælles konsultationsmekanisme, der fører til enighed.
There can be no doubt that participation in the financing of nuclear power stations in frontier regions can be viewed as part and parcel of this mandate, but no one could reasonably claim that the development was balanced, and certainly not smooth, unless there is a Community consultation mechanism capable of achieving agree ment between the two sides.
Dér blev der fremsat de samme indvendinger, som alierede var fremført i min betænkning og også i betragtning c) og d) i beslutningen i hr. Collas betænkning, nemlig at regeringerne ikke efterkommer Euratomtraktatens artikel 37 og 41 tilfredsstillende, og at den fælles konsultationsprocedure hidtil ikke har ført til tilfredsstillende resultater. Kommissionen havde nemlig på grundlag af beslutningen af 13. januar 1976 sat sig i bevægelse og fremlagt et forslag til en fælles konsultationsprocedure.
It can be said that safety was considered in the Euratom Treaty and that, at the time, its main concern was radioprotection, principally the radioprotection of researchers and workers, and whilst the numbers of reactors operating in Europe — and the consequent physical safety of the power stations and of the population — have grown out of all proportion, there has been no compensatory change in the Community's present policies.
Det gamle Parlament vedtog den 7. juli 1977 en tilsvarende beslutning på grundlag af en betænkning, der ligeledes var affattet af mig.
There is a widespread popular movement around this call for greater and more rational security.
Det forlangte her fælles kriterier, men frygtede, at den fælles konsultationsprocedure kun ville blive af begrænset virkning, fordi der manglede en voldgiftsmekanisme i tilfælde af vedvarende uenighed mellem to medlemsstater.
This move ment has received increasing support in Europe, particularly after the accident at Three Mile Island, which was one of a number of incidents which gave a new stimulus to both thought and research.
Punkt 3 er den sædvanlige formidlingsklausul.
Paragraph 3 of the motion for a resolution is the usual 'forwarding' clause.
Vi forlanger yderligere, at også medlemsstaterne tager denne beslutning til efterretning, fordi de enkelte medlemsstater opfordres til i konkrete tilfælde i gensidig interesse at tilstræbe et forlig.
We also demand that the Member States take note of this resolution on the grounds that it is up to the individual Member States to seek agree ment in specific cases in the interests of the two or more sides.
Vi håber, at Parlamentet bifalder dette forslag.
We hope that this House will give its approval to our motion for a resolution.
Lizin, ordfører. — (FR) Hr. formand, i betragtning af den type forhandling, vi her er i gang med, tror jeg godt, man kunne begrænse sig til 2 minutter, eftersom interessen, så vidt jeg kan se, desværre er stærkt begrænset.
Mrs Lizin, rapporteur. — (FR) Mr President, in view of the nature of the debate forced upon us, I believe
Når man betragter disse to perioder, har overvejelserne over sikkerhedsspørgsmål ikke været tilpasset den anden periode med kerne kraftens udbredelse, og udviklingen af sikkerheds foranstaltninger er ikke løbet parallelt med den industrielle udvikling i elektricitetsfremstillingen.
The situation in Europe as regards security is one of non-information or of partial or occasional information resulting from chance or the more or less fortunate curiosity of individuals, whilst the volume of nuclear energy produced means that information concerning it should be the right of every individual.
Hvilke funktioner bør Europa påtage sig for at styrke denne ret til sikkerhed?
Nuclear safety was no doubt considered at each stage, but was never a first priority in the facts we are now facing.
Hvis man adskiller de tre funktioner, at give tilladelser, at fastsætte regler og at føre kontrol, er det klart, at Europa ikke kan påtage sig noget ansvar i spørgsmålet om at give tilladelser.
In future it must be the first priority: the view of our committee is that we must in a way redefine after the event this fait accompli, this economic deci sion, in terms which are more satisfactory for the people and which establish and guarantee their right to safety.
Det kan ikke være Europas opgave at overtage staternes funktioner i beslutninger om det ene eller det andet anlæg.
Of course, not everyone can become an expert in nuclear energy and capable of understanding every technical aspect of safety.
Derimod bør det gå ind i fastsættelsen af reglerne, hvilket det kan gøre langt bedre end de enkelte medlemsstater og med en større effektivitet, fordi der så tages hensyn til hele det europæiske område.
However, every man and woman in Europe who lives near to or not far from a reactor, or who has to do so in the future, has the right to live in safety and to know that there exist reliable, independent procedures which guarantee that account is being taken of his interest in security.
Hvad angår spørgsmålet om at føre kontrol må det, selv om man ikke tænker sig en konkret gennemførelse på stedet og ikke, at denne kontrol skal være en europæisk affære, baseret på principper og rammer, som følger fælleseuropæiske regler.
The fact is that secrecy harms everyone : it creates suspicion which works as much against those from the power stations as against the general population and the general interest.
Opstillingen af disse regler og fastlæggelse af rammerne for kontrol med deres gennemførelse er netop, hvad der foreslås Parlamentet i betænkningen.
Indeed, we can only regret that those responsible for nuclear power plants have rarely thought of information as being in the general interest and most frequently secrecy is their general rule.
Hvad er det da vi konstaterer, og hvorpå baserer vi vort arbejde? Jeg vil sige for det første på en ufærdig traktet, som er dårligt tilpasset den reelle situation i elektricitetsproduktionen, men også for mange aspekters vedkommende for lidt anvendt.
It is not for Europe to usurp the role of the State in deciding on such and such a nuclear plant.
Der er imidlertid også i den konkrete administration af forholdene tale om en lammelse, om ikke ligefrem en indskrænkning i sikkerhedspolitikken.
As regards monitoring, even though there are no proposals to make monitoring a European responsibility, the management and the principles involved should also be the subject of European standards.
Mange folkelige bevægelser går ind for kravet om bedre og mere rationelle sikkerhedsbestemmelser.
Setting the standards and setting a framework for their application is the task of our report to the House.
På et tidspunkt hvor denne politik er mere nødvendig for Europa end nogen sinde, har visse medlemsstater gjort den til et spørgsmål om nationale interesser og nægter sågar at være med til at udarbejde juridiske regler, der nu i årevis har været til drøftelse i Rådet.
The report by the Committee on Energy is therefore based on two balances which we would like to see restruck: the first is the balance between radio-protection matters (Articles 30 to 37 of the Treaty) and those which relate to physical safety standards which are still practically non-existant today, whereas they should be regarded as equal to radioprotection; the second is the balance in favour of information and its manage ment. Radioprotection is one of the buttresses of the European fortress.
Undertiden holder Kommissionen sig også tilbage på dette punkt og sylter udmærkede forslag, som er udarbejdet af dens tjenestegrene eller af ekspert grupper, der arbejder for Kommissionen.
What we have found, the basis from which we have been working, is an imperfect Treaty, ill-suited to the present situation of electricity generation, and, in many respects, inadequately enforced; and at the same time, in the actual management of the subject, a stand still if not a decline in safety policies.
Men vi befinder os her i et europæisk parlament, og det spørgsmål, vi bør stille os selv, drejer sig ikke om den nukleare sikkerhed i al almindelighed, men om den maksimale effektivisering af de europæiske organers sikkerhedspolitik.
Application of Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty — which requires analysis of all effluents — has for a few weeks now been based on new recommendations, the old ones having dated from 1960.
Vi ønsker ikke at europæisere sikkerhedsspørgsmålet på grundlag af bestemte idealer, eller fordi vi synes, det er morsomt.
The additional data required by the Commission to do its work properly and effectively and especially to do it before permission to build can be granted, are now compulsory.
Det er også at give de personer ret, som ønsker at sikkerhedsspørgsmålet skal omgives af hemmelighedskræmmeri på grund af egoistiske interesser.
We shall ensure that the Commission respects this new recommendation it has given itself.
Der har jo nok været tænkt på den nukleare sikkerhed på alle stadier af processen, men spørgsmålet har aldrig fået nogen høj prioritet i det valg, der er truffet.
Lastly, the physical safety of power stations has been completely neglected in the legal arsenal with which the Commission has equipped itself.
Det ønsker vi, at det skal have fremover.
The Council Resolution of 22 July 1975 is far too weak.