natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Selv om vi påskønner den gode intention bag forslaget, mener vi, at en sådan bestemmelse er imod de demokratiske principper for Parlamentets arbejde.
I would just like to draw attention to a couple of small but important points to which we have to object on grounds of principle.
Jeg vil dog gerne påpege, at Parlamentet ved hjælp af artikel 95 har gennemført betydningsfulde forhandlinger, der som følge af de vedtagne beslutninger er blevet til gode visitkort for Europa-Parlamentet. Jeg tænker især på det, der er gjort for kvinderne og i forbindelse med racisme og fascisme.
On the other hand, the procedural methods and pro cesses must meet the requirements of effectiveness and efficiency, without prejudice to the fundamental principles which define the character of the institution and permit the expression, in the most appropriate form, of its collective will.
Jeg ønsker nemlig ikke, at resultatet af denne reform bliver en svækkelse af vore muligheder for at behandle sådan ne emner.
So any proposal to amend this Parliament's Rules of Procedure is always welcome if it has these objectives.
Hammerich (ARC). — Fru formand, vi synes så mænd, at der er mange fornuftige forslag til ændring af forretningsordenen i denne pakke, og jeg vil kun henlede opmærksomheden på et par små vigtige ting, som vi må vende os imod af principielle grunde.
This is why we welcome all the proposed amendments which appear in the Patterson, Amadei and Dury reports, and some of those presented by Mr Prout.
Noget sådant er allerede sket, og vi er klar over, at det kan medføre blokering.
We cannot accept this continuing tendency in the European Parliament to leave everything to the large groups.
Jeg vil gerne slutte med spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt der ikke også er fare for obstruktion i forbindelse med de midlertidige udvalg, for selv om undersøgel sesudvalgene ifølge ordføreren er mere praktiske end politiske, så er det måske netop i forbindelse med de midlertige udvalg, at der er fare for obstruktion. Det er her, det fremtidige problem ligger.
In fact, all these proposals not only improve the effectiveness and efficiency of parliamentary procedure, they also respect the principles of democratic representation which constitute the very foundation of this Parliament's existence.
Vi kan ikke tage den ne stadige tendens, der er i Europa-Parlamentet til, at alt overlades til de store grupper.
The second point relates to the proposal that there should be Question Time in the committees.
Det andet omhandler, at der skal kunne være spørgetid i udvalgene; det synes vi er en god idé, også at det gøres offentligt.
We think that is a good idea, also that the proceedings should be made public.
Men vi kan ikke acceptere, at referaterne ikke skal oversættes til alle de officielle sprog.
But we cannot accept that speeches should not be translated into all the official languages.
Vi vender os imod ethvert angreb på oversættelse, fordi vi synes, det er så vigtigt at beskytte sprogene og den kultur, de indebærer.
We resist any attack on translation, because we believe it is so important to protect the languages and the cultures they express.
Det er altså vor holdning. Som konklusion beder jeg hr. Prout om at acceptere hr. Arndts og hr. Adams ændringsforslag, der tilstræber en forenkling af hans betænkning.
The discretionary powers with which Mr Prout pro poses to endow the President of Parliament would override the collective will of this Assembly and are inadmissible.
Vayssade (S). — (FR) Fru formand, jeg vil især tale om ændringerne af artikel 91 og følgende.
VAYSSADE (S). — (FR) Madam President, I wish to concentrate on the amendments to Rules 91 and 92 and those that follow.
Siden 1979, altså siden Parlamentet er direkte valgt, har vi arbejdet på at gøre forretningsordenen til et bedre redskab for det nye Europa-Parlament.
Since 1979 — in other words, since direct elections — we have been trying to adapt our Rules of Procedure more closely to the needs of the new Parliament.
Med henblik herpå prøver vi på at forlige to krav, som det ikke altid er lige nemt at forene: styrkelse af medlem
This has meant trying to reconcile two requirements that are not always compatible: on the one hand, uphold ing the rights of individual Members and of minorities and, on the other hand, strengthening Parliament's role, effectiveness and consistency as an institution.
Schwalba-Hoth (ARC). - (DE) Fru formand, hvad vil De gøre, hvis De under Deres i politisk henseende så vigtige arbejde i Europa-Parlamentet lige pludselig lægger mærke til, at der er en flue eller en myg, der hele tiden forstyrrer Dem?
Further, as there is no disciplinary power over Members who might fail to comply with the President's decision, the rule would be unenforceable and there fore useless.
De vil enten gribe til den kemiske spraydåse og fjerne denne forstyrrelse eller
So the Group of the European Alliance for Renewal and Democracy will vote in favour of those amend ments proposed by the Committee on Rules of Proce
Det er udgifterne til oversættelse og omdeling af disse artikel 47-beslutningsforslag, der bekymrer mig. De res antal er steget fra 184 forslag i 1979 til 1 400 i 1985.
We will support the proposed reform, hoping that Parliament will make good use of these two instru- us is to blow particles of radioactive dust round the building.
Mens omkostningerne må stå i et rimeligt forhold til formålet.
We have here in the European Parliament Members who table motions for resolutions — Rule 47 motions, as we say in the jargon — in order to raise matters to which very little attention or no attention at all would otherwise be paid.
Men vi har i Parlamentet medlemmer, der via undersøgelsesudvalg ønsker at bringe ubehagelige ting på bane, f.eks. den stigende fascisme og racisme eller repressionen mod britiske minearbejdere.
I am thinking, in particular, of its work on the subjects of women's rights, racism and fascism.
Såfremt procedurerne i henhold til artikel 48, stk. 1, anvendes i tilfælde, hvor det er sandsynligt, at sagen er vigtig, så behøver ophavsmanden kun at få støtte fra sin gruppe eller underskrifter fra mindst 21 med lemmer.
The text proposed by Mr Prout presents a number of problems for us and so I shall support the Socialist Group's amendments as a whole, since I regard them as simpler and better drafted.
Hvordan begrænser man nu disse medlemmer — Ford, Heinrich, Cervetti, Vandemeulebroucke osv.?
So how are we to keep them under control, these particular Members — the Fords, the Heinrichs, the Cervettis, the Vandemeulebrouckes?
Ikke med fluesmækkeren, det har De ret i; vi er jo ikke nogen spyfluer.
Not with the fly-swatter, you are quite right, we're not bluebottles, are we?
Nej, man gør det med en æn dring af forretningsordenen!
No, we do it by making an amendment to the Rules of Procedure.
Man forelægger en Pro-ut-betænkning, der med den foreslåede ændring af artikel 91, stk. 3, eliminerer visse spørgsmål for undersøgelsesudvalgene.
We table the Prout report with its proposed amendments to Rule 95(3) eliminating certain matters from the terms of reference of committees of inquiry.
Man forelægger en Pattersonbetænkning, der forbyder, at oversættelserne af de fremsatte beslutningsforslag omdeles.
We table the Patterson report that will prevent the translated versions of the motions for resolutions tabled from being distributed.
Alt sammen med den overfladiske retfærdiggørelse at man bør spare papir.
All this is being done on the apparent grounds that it will help to save paper.
Begynd da hellere med at begrænse sideantallet i udvalgsbetænkningerne!
A better way of doing that would be to set a limit to the number of pages in a committee report.
Hr. Prout og hr. Patterson— trods enhver personlig højagtelse: Jeg tror, De har ladet Dem misbruge til at holde ubehagelige synspunkter uden for debatten.
I must say to Mr Prout and to Mr Patterson — and I mean no disrespect to you personally — that I believe you have allowed yourselves to be taken advantage of as a way of denying a fair hearing to those who adopt inconvenient positions.
Endelig kan jeg meddele Parlamentet, at det først var, efter at jeg havde stillet mit ændringsforslag, at jeg tilfældigvis opdagede, at dette havde været ordføreren hr. Pattersons oprindelige tekst, som var blevet ændret i udvalget.
To conclude, I wonder whether there is not also a danger that the setting up of temporary committees could be blocked, for given that, as the rapporteur has said, the committees of inquiry are technical rather than political, it is perhaps more likely that the tem porary committees would be blocked.
Jeg opfordrer derfor alle medlemmer af Parlamentet til at stemme imod den ændring af artikel 91, stk. 3, som hr. Prout har foreslået, og mod hele Pattersonbetænkningen.
I therefore appeal to all honourable Members to vote against Mr Prout's amendment to Rule 95(3) and aginst the Patterson report as a whole.
Vi er ikke nogen spyfleur, som man via forretningsordenen kan eliminere og dermed gøre det af med. Vi ønsker ikke via en ændring af forretningsordenen at få indskrænket vor ret til også at bringe ubehagelige spørgsmål på bane.
We are not bluebottles that can be eliminated just by changing the Rules and shutting us out of the game. We do not accept that the Rules should be changed to deny us our political rights, including the right to bring up unpleasant subjects for debate.
Dette gælder Prout-betænkningen og Pattersonbetænkningen.
That is what the Prout report and the Patterson report will do.
Cicciomessere (NI). — (IT) Fru formand, i udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender har jeg flere gange påpeget, at der er indeholdt nogle selvmodsigelser eller i det mindste nogle negative elementer i de foreliggende ændringsforslag, som vi skal forhandle og stemme om.
As regards the Dury and Amadei reports, we believe that these will result in a fundamental improvement in the Rules of Procedure and we shall certainly vote in favour of them.
Hvad angår Dury- og Amadei-betænkningeme, me ner vi, at man herved kan opnå en væsentlig forbedring af forretningsordenen og vil derfor selvfølgelig stemme for dem.
SCHWALBA-HOTH (ARC). — (DE) Madam President, what would you do if your concentration on the ever so important political work you do here in the European Parliament was being disrupted by the buzzing of a fly or a mosquito?
Peter Beazley (ED). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil ger ne henvise til mit ændringsforslag til Patterson-betænkningen om artikel 47 i forretningsordenen.
BEAZLEY, Peter (ED). — Madam President, I want to refer to my own amendment to the Patterson report on Rule 47.
Det ønsker at udelade ordene »trykkes på de officielle sprog, omdeles...« Formålet med dette ændringsforslag er ikke at demonstrere manglende respekt for nogen af mindretalssprogene.
This seeks to delete the words 'printed and distributed in the official languages'. The reason for this amendment is not to show any disrespect whatsoever for minority languages.
Hvis beslutningsforslagene sendes til udvalget på ophavsmandens sprog, udvises der dermed respekt for disse sprog.
If motions are sent to the committee in the author's original language, due respect is automatically shown for them.
Det er et princip, der privilegerer den politiske gruppe fremfor det enkelte medlem.
Their number has increased from 184 resolutions tabled in 1979 to 1 400 in 1985. I hate to think what it is this year.
I udvalget har jeg flere gange bedt vores formand, mine kolleger og de ansvarlige tjenestegrene om at gennemføre en undersøgelse for at finde ud af, om dette argument, som mange kolleger har været grebet af — spild af tid, af papier og så videre — virkelig er gyldigt, det vil sige om det virkelig er sandt, at de enkelte medlemmer og især dem uden for grupperne vil drukne Parlamentet i et hav af papir, i et hav af ændringsforslag, i et hav af beslutninger og så vide re.
Beazley forth — is in fact valid; that is to say, whether it is true that individual members, and non-attached Members in particular, are flooding this Parliament with a sea of paper, a sea of amendments, a sea of resolutions, and so forth.
Så er det naturligvis op til formand en og Parlamentets organer at afgøre, hvilke emner det i sidste ende ligger uden for udvalgets kompetenceområde.
If Rule 48(1) procedure is used in cases where the matter is likely to be important, then the originator only needs to get group support or at least the signatures of 21 Members.
Det er imidlertid ikke muligt at udelukke en lang række emner — temaer som har været gen stand for drøftelse i vore udvalg, og som har interesseret parlamentsudvalgene — gennem en bestemmelse, der i virkeligheden vil underminere mindretallenes rettigheder her i Parlamentet, og som ydermere vil skabe kopier af de allerede eksisterende udvalg, f. eks. budgetkontroludvalget.
Surely if the originator has a good cause for submitting such a resolution in the first place and incurring all the costs that that automatically entails, the resolution should be sufficiently compel ling to attract that minimal support required under Rule 48(1).
Det er ikke tilfældigt, fru formand, at denne undersøgelse ikke er blevet foretaget: og det af en meget enkel grund: for i langt de fleste tilfælde forelægges æn dringsforslagene, dokumenterne, beslutningerne og andet af de store grupper, af de politiske grupper og bestemt ikke af de enkelte medlemmer.
It is no coincidence that this investigation has never been carried out, Madam President, and for a very simple reason: because the overwhelming majority of amendments, documents, resolutions and the like are put forward by the large groups, the political groups, and not — there is no doubt about it — by individual Members.
Derfor har jeg som ordfører ikke været enig i kravet om yderligere at hæve »loftet« for de underskrifter, der kræves for at forelægge beslutninger, som det er indeholdt i fru Durys ændringsforslag.
Therefore, as the rapporteur, I did not agree with the call to raise yet again the 'ceiling' of the signatures needed in order to table resolutions, as is provided for by Mrs Dury's proposed amendment.
Jeg kan ganske enkelt ikke forstå, hvorfor man i lyset af de situation, Jeg netop har beskrevet, skal straffe det enkelte medlem, idet artikel 40 og artikel 42 allerede indeholder en række betingelser, der skal opfyldes, før man kan afholde den slags forhandlinger, der så gør det muligt at forelægge endelige dokumenter.
I cannot in fact understand why, with the situation as I have outlined it, the individual Member should be penalized, when Rule 40 and Rule 42 already contain a number of requirements that have to be satisfied in order for a debate to be held of the kind that allows the presentation of final documents.
Den genoptages i eftermiddag efter afstemningen.
Finally, I should like to inform the House that it was only after I submitted my amendment that I discovered by chance that this had been the original text of your rapporteur, Mr Patterson, but it was amended in committee.
Jeg synes faktisk, fru formand, at vi lige så godt én gang for alle kan gøre det af med Parlamentet; lad os give magten til grupperne og overlade det til for mandskabet at udarbejde og vedtage dokumenterne!
At this point, Madam President, let us have done once and for all with our Parliament: give power to the groups and leave the definition and approval of documents to the Bureau!
Problemet vedrører ikke blot beskyttelsen af med lemmerne uden for grupperne, men også medlem merne inden for de store grupper, der — som følge af de bestemmelser der her lægges op til — ikke længere ville have indflydelse, ikke længere ville have mulig hed for at udtale sig politisk, for at fremlægge deres eget politiske standpunkt i et hvilket som helst dokument eller i en beslutning.
The problem concerns not only the protection of the rights of non-attached Members, it concerns also the protection of the rights of members of the large groups who, with these regulations that are being put forward, would no longer have any say, no longer be able to express their political views and set out, in any kind of document or in a resolution, their own political position.
Fitzgerald (RDE). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne henlede Deres opmærksomhed på de nye sikkerheds- foranstaltninsikkerhedsforanstaltninger for parlamentsmedlemmer og ansatte ved indgangen til bygningen. Efter min mening svarer dette nye system nærmest til et rovdyrbur, hvor yderdøren ikke kan åbnes, når inderdøren er åben, og inderdøren ikke kan åbnes, når yderdøren er åben, Med andre ord: medlemmerne og de ansatte er buret inde mellem disse to døre i et stykke tid.
CICCIOMESSERE (NI). — (IT) Madam President, I have on more than one occasion pointed out, in the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions, a number of contradications or, at all events, negative elements that are contained in the proposed amend ment which has been submitted to us for debate and for a vote to be taken on it.
leg går helt ind for sikkererhed, men jeg må anmode Dem om at få dette nye system undersøgt, især da jeg har forstået, at systemet kun anvendes for Parlamen tets og ikke for Europarådets ansatte.
Nor, moreover, Madam President, is there any justification for increasing in this way to 23 the number of Members necessary in order to table resolutions after Spain and Portugal's entry into our Parliament, because, as you will recall, we already last year tackled the problem of the general revision of all the numerical conditions prescribed by the Rules of Procedure, in relation to the increase in the number of Members of Parliament, and we did not consider it necessary to amend the numerical composition specified in Rule 40 and Rule 42, since we are here talking about two essential acts on the part of Members — the making of political proposals and political speeches.
I øvrigt er den forhøjelse af antallet af medlemmer, der kræves for at forelægge beslutninger, til 23 heller ikke berettiget efter Spaniens og Portugals tiltrædelse, for som De husker, diskuterede vi allerede sidste år problemet vedrørende en generel revision af alle de talmæssige betingelser, der er indeholdt i forretningsordenen, fer så vidt angår forhøjelsen af antallet af parlamentsmedlemmer, og vi fandt det ikke nødvendigt at ændre den talmæssige sammensætning, der findes i artikel 40 og artikel 42, eftersom der her er tale om to afgørende elementer i medlemmernes mulighed for at stille politiske forslag, for at intervenere på det politiske plan.
It is a conception that gives preference to political groups over individual Members. What we are seeing, through successive par liamentary amendments, justified from time to time by the entry of representatives of one Member State or another into the Parliamentary structure, is a series of regulations that in fact limit to an increasing degree the power and prerogatives of the individual Member, transferring all of the prerogatives to the political groups, using as a pretext the plethora of amendments allegedly tabled by minorities, individual Members and so on.
Derfor foreslår vi, at man genindføjer de bestemmelser, der hidtil har været indeholdt i vores forretningsorden. orden.
On a number of occasions in committee, Madam President, I have asked our chairman, as well as other committee members and the competent departments, for an investigation to be made in order to ascertain whether this argument that fires the enthusiasm of so many colleagues — waste of time, and paper, and so
Hvad spørgsmålet om undersøgelsesudvalg angår, udvalg der har til opgave at undersøge særlige spørgsmål, mener jeg at måtte støtte hr. Prouts
With regard to the question of committees of inquiry, committees responsible for investigating particular questions, I think I have to welcome Mr Prout's for mula, which specifies the questions which it is necessary to investigate — that is to say, alleged contraventions of Community law or incidents of maladministration in respect of Community responsibilities.
Metten (S). — (NL) Jeg har forstået, at vi i morgen kl. 12.00 allerede vil have afsluttet forhandlingen om dagens betænkninger.
But I do not think that on these subjects, Madam President, we can block the right of minorities to call for the set-
Formanden. — Vi kunne på grund af manglende præsens ikke sætte betænkningerne til forhandling, men drøftelserne vil som sædvanlig blive fortsat efter af stemningen.
PRESIDENT. — We could not take the reports because there were not enough of them, but the debate will be continued as usual after the votes.
A2-132/86) af Bachy for udvalget om sociale anliggender og beskæftigelse om fleksibili tet på arbejdsmarkedet
A 2-132/86) by Mr Bachy, on behalf of the Committee on Social Affairs and Employment, on flexibility in the labour market ting up of committees.
Vi mener ikke at kunne stemme for det endelige resultat, og jeg skal give nogle grunde her til.
It will be resumed this afternoon after the votes.
Mener de neoliberale, at dette ville være muligt uden at undertrykke fagforeningsbevægelsen?
We feel that the result is such that we cannot in the end approve it and I will give a few reasons why that is so.
Så indskrænker man måske bare de demokratiske frihedsrettigheder?
(The sitting was adjourned at 12.05 p.m. and resumed at 3 p.m.)
De engelske minearbejdere har noget at sige om dette.
IN THE CHAIR: MR ALBER
Der er en generel underliggende tone, der antyder, at arbejdsløsheden i Europa udelukkende finder sted på bekostning af de ulykkelige, og at hvis vi skulle gå ind for den fleksibilitet, der opfordres til, ville det alligevel overhovedet ikke hjælpe os.
There is the general underlying tone which suggests that unemployment in Europe is entirely at the expense of the unfortunate and that if we were to go in for the flexibility asked for, it would not help us at all.
Skønt ordene giver udtryk for en positiv holdning til fleksibilitet, er svaret i realiteten nej, vi ønsker ikke fleksibilitet, vi kan klare os uden.
And therefore, although the words suggest a positive attitude to flexibility, in actual fact whenever it is touched upon, the answer is: no we can do not want it, we can do without it.
Hr. formand, hvis vi fortsætter på denne måde, er det min gruppes opfattelse, at vi vil ødelægge den europæiske økonomi.
Mr President, if we go on like this, it is the opinion of our group that we will sink this European economic venture.
Uden den rigtige form for økonomi vil vi ikke være i stand til at overleve.
Without the right kind of economy we will not be able to survive.
Vi vil ikke være i stand til at opretholde de erhvervede værdier.
We won't be able to keep up the values which we have achieved.
Derfor vil vi stemme imod dette beslutningsforslag, selv om det smerter os dybt.
Therefore we are going to vote against this resolution, much as that pains us.
Barros Moura (COM). - (PT) Hr. formand, vi vil stemme for Bachybetænkningen efter resultatet af den afstemning, der lige har fundet sted.
FITZGERALD (RDE). — Mr President, I want to draw your attention to new security arrangements at the front of the building for parliamentarians and officials.
Under disse omstændigheder må kollektive overens komster være en gængs metode til demokratisk regulering af arbejdsmarkedet.
In my opinion this new move is something akin to a wild animal cage where the outer door cannot be opened while the inner door is open and the inner door cannot be opened while the outer door is open.
Og findes der en mere fleksibel og åben metode end forhandling?
In other words, the Members and the officials are caged in between those two doors for a period.
Lad os forstå hinanden rigtigt: arbejderne forsvarer ikke en kunstig opretholdelse af arbejdspladser, men derimod pro duktive arbejdspladser; de er ikke imod de nye tek nologier, men de vil sætte dem i menneskets tjeneste og ikke bruge dem til at nedlægge arbejdspladser; de går ikke ind for en ubevægelig organisering af arbejdet, men derimod for tilpasning.
I am all in favour of security, but I would appeal to you to have this new system examined, particularly when I understand that the system only applies to officials of the Parliament and not to officials of the Council of Europe.