natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvis man forstår at definere disse problemer, hvorfor formulerer man så ikke en politik, som netop tager sigte her på, ikke globalt gennem prisforhøjelser, men gennem stringente og direkte foranstaltninger netop med hen blik på disse problemer?
If these problems can be defined, why not formulate a policy specifically designed to tackle them, not on a global basis with price increases but with stringent and direct measures, aimed specifically at these problems?
Da Kommissionen på ny spiller ud med 120 mio ECU i mælkesektoren, igen erkender, at der må ske noget med hensyn til de mindse malkekvægbedrifter, spørger jeg simpelt hen mig selv helt konkret — og det er der ikke noget
As the Commission has again referred to 120m ECU for the milk sector and has again acknowledged that something must be done for small dairy farmers, I simply wonder in a very down-to-earth way — there is nothing magic about this — why this proposal, this package now before us, cannot be extended to include other sectors, why the amount cannot be increased so that the problems that have emerged in those sectors can be alleviated with direct measures.
I Frankrig er der f.eks. foretaget slagtning af 18 % flere køer i andet halvår af 1984, end det var tilfældet i andet halvår af 1983.
He proposes prices regardless of the inequalities that exist and without any specific scheme for products in difficulty.
Og det kalder De i det europæiske regnskab en landbrugsindkomst,
He takes no account of farm incomes or the jobs lost as a result and offers us no change in structural or social aspects.
Der skal imidlertid drages omsorg for en større ind byrdes sammenhæng mellem disse landbrugsprogrammer.
We shall talk about the details in March, so for the moment I should like to concentrate on Mr Andriessen's principal remarks.
En fælles landbrugspolitik burde være hensyntagen til fællesskabspræferencen; afvigelser herfra koster gen nemsnitlig en tredjedel af EUGFLs budget om året, og vi vil lade de europæiske landbrugere alene bære vanskelighederne på verdensmarkedet!
A common agricultural policy should take account of the Community preference — derogations from which cost the EAGGF an average of a third of its budget every year — and we want to make the European farmers alone shoulder the burden of the problems of the world market!
Den fælles landbrugspolitik burde være beherskelse af produktionsmængderne, af priserne, som følger inflationen, og som skal fastsættes produkt for produkt.
The common agricultural policy should control the volume of production and see that prices, assessed on a product-by-product basis, keep pace with inflation.
Det burde være en øget opmærksomhed over for dermed for bundne foranstaltninger, ordninger, interventionsniveauer og betalingsfrister.
It should pay greater attention to allied measures, to the machinery and the levels of intervention and the time taken to make payments.
Det burde være hensyntagen til forskellene mellem dem, som betaler, eftersom nogen jo skal betale.
And it should, as of course someone has to pay, take account of the differences between the payers.
Den fælles landbrugspolitik burde også være en ge noprettelse af balancen mellem regionerne i Nordeuropa og i Sydeuropa, fremme af de ugunstigt stillede regioner, tilpasning af bestemmelser til fordel for middelhavsprodukter og -regioner via EUGFL ud viklingssektion.
The CAP should also mean striking a fresh balance between the regions in the north and south of Europe. It should mean promoting the underprivileged regions and changing the rules to help Mediterranean productions and regions with the guidance section of the EAGGF.
Om dette punkt holder man en tale for os om nødvendigheden af at genoprette balancen, om landbrugernes grundlæggende samfundsmæssige rolle for livet i regionerne, men denne tale fulgtes ikke op af forslag.
We are told about the need for fresh balance and the fundamental social role played by the farmers in the life of the regions, but the proposals do not follow. low.
Der næres for økeblikket tre forventninger til den europæiske landbrugspolitik: for det første skal overskudsproblemet løses, for det andet skal landbrugernes indkomster sikres, og for det tredje skal omkostningerne til landbrugspolitikken bremses.
At present three things are required of Community agricultural policy: firstly the problem of surpluses must be solved, secondly farmers' incomes must be guaranteed and thirdly the cost of the agricultural policy must be drastically curtailed.
Den, der holder sig disse tre ting for øje, ved, hvor vanskeligt det er at løse disse problemer.
Anyone who con siders these three things together knows how hard it will be to find a solution.
Jeg vil gerne tilføje, at det er de politisk ansvarliges hidtidige passivitet, der har bragt os i denne situation.
I would add that it is the fail ure hitherto of those with political responsibility to take any action which has brought us to this state.
Derfor er vi glade for, at der nu i det hele taget gribes til handling.
Consequently we are glad now to see anything at all being done.
Ganske vist bliver der efter min mening — og efter min gruppes mening — handlet forkert på flere områder.
Nevertheless, in my view and in that of my Group, in many areas the wrong thing is being done.
Må jeg lige indskyde en bemærkning: den, der i dag kræver budgetdisciplin, skal vide, at fortidens fejl ikke kan rettes, uden at det koster penge, og omkostningerne skal ikke bæres af landbrugerne.
If I may be allowed a preliminary observation: those who call today for budgetary discipline must accept that the mistakes of the past must be paid for but must not be made good at the expense of the far mers.
Europa-Parlamentet har gentagne gange udtalt sig om retningslinjerne for en ny strukturpolitik.
The European Parliament has given its opinion on guidelines for a new structural policy on a number of occasions.
Alle synes at være klar over udfordringen, men så snart man kommer ind på den finansielle side af sagen, tager de nationale interesser igen overhånd og blokerer for den dynamiske politik, der forventes.
Everyone seems to realize what is at stake, but as soon as the financial side of things comes up, national interests get the upper hand and block the dynamic policy we are waiting for.
Kløften mellem Nordeuropa og Sydeuropa, mellem gunstigt og ugunstigt stillede regioner uddybes uophørligt.
The gap between northern and southern Europe, between the favoured and the unfavoured regions, is getting wider all the time.
Prisforslagene indebærer ikke sociostrukturelle ordninger i overensstemmelse med behovene.
In reply to a number of comments I would say that the most important aim of the common agricultural policy for the moment — in the interest both of farmers and consumers — is to reduce surpluses.
De vil yderligere forværre situationen; der er risiko for, at den ikke igen kan vendes til det bedre.
We agree with the Commission on this and we can also say how the quantities to be secured can be defined.
Kommissionens forslag om en forordning om strukturernes effektivitet er ambitiøse.
The Commission proposals, through the regulation on the effectiveness of the structures, are ambitious.
De indebærer en støtte til små og mellemstore bedrifter, de indfører et loft og ikke en bund.
They include aid for small and mediumsized concerns and they introduce a ceiling rather than a threshold, thereby allowing us to hope that a disastrous policy, the exacerbated productivism of the development plans, will be abandoned.
De giver således håb om, at en ødelæggende politik opgives, dvs. den forværrede produktivisme, der er fastsat i udviklingsplanerne.
They aim to help young people set up in agriculture, thereby showing that the Community has at last recognized the need for young people to go into farming and stresses their import ance.
Som svar på visse bemærkninger: i første omgang er det vigtigste mål for den fælles landbrugspolitik — både i landbrugernes og i forbrugernes interesse — nedbringelse af overskudsproduktionen.
We want to limit surplus production by limiting price guarantees — as in the case of milk or sugar — in all cases where we are able, because of the situation of the production process, to introduce a quota system.
Deri er vi enige med Kommissionen, og vi kan også sige, hvor ledes den mængde der skal gives prisgaranti for, kan fastsættes.
But these agricultural programmes need more coherence. We still believe in the integrated Mediterranean programmes.
Den bygger på fire elementer: for det første en tilstrækkelig forsyning af befolkningen, for det andet en reserve som sikkerhed, for det tredje den mængde, vi kan afsætte på verdensmarkedet, og for det fjerde det, vi behøver til fødevarehjælp.
All the structural programmes that we want must include price fixing, as part of an overall scheme, and we shall not be able to discuss the CAP if we are now agreeing to backtrack on the spirit of the Treaty of Rome.
Derfor afviser vi enhver politik gående ud på at trykke priserne, altså forsøget på at mindske produktionsmængden ved hjælp af prissænkninger, fordi de truer hundredetu-
We are also quite aware that, in view of the differing structures existing within this Community, we shall
Bocklet mener, at det er modigt af Dem at hejse flaget og forsøge at vise erhvervet, at der må ske en ændring.
Bocklet ing, Mr Commissioner, that we as a group believe that you have the courage to do it and we will give you the support that we believe is necessary.
Vi er imidlertid klar over, at de forslag, De har frem sat, sandsynligvis vil øge produktionen i år, og det er ikke rigtig i Fællesskabets interesse.
We are thus in favour of income supplements, like those we already have in the programme for hill farmers in disadvantaged regions.
Det vil betyde større overskud, og vi er også klar over, som De selv understregede, at det vil få nogle alvorlige budget mæssige konsekvenser for Fællesskabet.
We favour income supplements for ecological reasons also and to maintain a certain man agement and rural structure, so that the smaller farms and holdings can survive.
For os kristelige demokrater er og bliver prispolitik ken grundlaget for sikringen af landbrugernes ind komster. Det betyder tillige et ja til en aktiv prispolitik — om end inden for rammerne af markedssituationen. Også det føjer jeg til.
I say this for very specific reasons: with twelve million unemployed in this Com munity, every farmer we force to leave the land is one man more on the dole!
Jeg håber, at Kommissionen vil bruge disse prisforslag som en mulighed for at vise flaget, og at den vil gå ud og pointere over for land brugserhvervet, hvad der sandsynligvis vil ske frem over.
As far as the Council is concerned, we believe that they are really the body that must take the ultimate decisions and that they must bite the bullet.
I alt for lang tid har landbrugsministrene accepteret inflatoriske landbrugspriser og forårsaget denne krise i Det europæiske Fællesskab.
For too long the Ministers of Agriculture have met inflated agricultural prices and brought this crisis upon the European Community.
Det påhviler også Rådet at tage ansvaret, og det skal se disse kendsgerninger i øjnene.
It is up to them to take the responsibility as well, and they must face reality and make certain that they carry the can.
Det vil blive vanskeligt for Rådet at skulle sige, at det er nødt til at skære ned.
It will be difficult for them to go back and say that they have to ren-' trench.
Men det er det nødt til at vinde gehør for.
But that is the story they have to get across.
Jeg nævner dette af ganske bestemte grunde: vi har 12 mio arbejdsløse i Fællesskabet, og hver landbruger, som vi jager ud af landbruget, betyder en arbejdsløs mere! Det er en ting, vi ikke kan acceptere.
We want to see the Community's agricultural policy applied at Euro pean level with greater attention being paid to the pro tection of the environment.
Til slut endnu to korte bemærkninger: vi ønsker, at Fællesskabets landbrugspolitik på europæisk plan i højere grad føres ud fra miljøbeskyttelsessynspunkter, at det kommer til en forsoning mellem miljøbeskyttelse og landbrugspolitik, samt at vi tager fællesskabs præferencen mere alvorligt; desværre nævnte kom missæren end ikke fællesskabspræferencen, som dog er en af de tre grundpiller i den fælles landbrugspolitik.
We want a reconciliation between environmental protection and agricultural policy and we want the system of Community prefer ences, to which the Commissioner has amazingly made no reference at all even though it is one of the three pillars of the CAP, to be taken more seriously.
Det, Kommissionen har foreslået, er efter vor mening for teknokratisk og ligegyldigt over for hun dredetusinde familiers skæbne.
We believe that the Commission's proposals are too technocratic and too indifferent to the fate of hundreds of thousands of families.
Derfor forkaster vi dette forslag til en løsning og anmoder Kommissionen om at sætte positive signaler op for den euro pæiske landbrugspolitik.
We thus reject this attempt at a solution and ask the Commission to give positive signals for the Community's agricultural policy.
Det er ikke andet.
It is no more than that.
Det er en midlertidig foranstaltning, der skal gøre det muligt for land brugsområdet at tilpasse sig de ændrede omstændigheder, som vi nu står overfor. Vi kender de budget mæssige konsekvenser, og det tror jeg også, at land mændene gør.
It is a hold ing operation to allow the agricultural sector to adjust itself to the changed circumstances that we now face.
Ingen skal derfor sige fremover, at der vil indtræffe en pludselig ændring i Fællesskabets landbrugspolitik — som man sagde om anvendelsen af kvoter.
Let no one say in future, therefore, that there is going to be a sudden arrival of change in the agricultural policy of the Community — as they said about the application of quotas.
Vi ved i Parlamentet, at da hr. Gundelach var kommissær i 1979, sagde han, at der måtte ske en væsentlig begrænsning af mælkeproduktionen i Fællesskabet.
We know in this House that Mr Gundelach, when he was Commissioner in 1979, said there would have to be great restriction on the output of milk in the Community.
Alligevel valgte erhvervet at tilsidesætte det.
Yet the industry chose to ignore it.
Lad os håbe, at landbrugserhvervet er ansvarligt nok til at forstå det budskab, der nu er indeholdt i Deres prisforslag for i år, hr. kommissær.
Let us hope that the agricultural industry is big enough to realize the messages that are now conveyed in your price proposals for this year, Commissioner.
Lad os håbe, at de indser, at de skal tilpasse sig, og lad os håbe, at de indser, at De vil fremsætte andre forslag fremover.
Let us hope they realize that they must adjust, and let us hope they realize that you will be coming forward with other proposals in the future.
Det ville være forkert at fremme en desta bilisering inden for landbrugserhvervet og i landdistrikterne, og vi glæder os over de forslag, De har fremsat, nemlig som nævnt som en status quo-foranstaltning. staltning.
It would be wrong to encourage destabilization in the agricultural indus try and the rural areas, and we welcome, therefore, the proposals that you have come forward with, as I say, as a holding operation.
Provan (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne tak ke kommissæren for den redegørelse, han har givet Parlamentet her i formiddag.
Mr Provan (ED). — Mr President, I should like to thank the Commissioner for the statement he has made to the House this morning.
Vi som gruppe glæder os over de forslag, De fremlægger vedrørende priserne for landbrugsområdet i år. Vi
We realize, however, that the proposals he has come forward with will probably increase production for this year, and that is not really in the Community's interests.
Hvad angår kornprodukter, mener vi, at en nedsættelse på 3,6% ikke er stor nok.
As far as cereals are concerned, we believe that the 3.6% cut is not great enough.
Vor gruppe, tror, at vi vil blive stillet over for alvorlige problemer med De forenede Stater, for så vidt angår afsætningen af korn,
We believe as a group that we shall be facing severe problems with the United States as far as cereal marketing is concerned, and that the proposals you have come forward with should, in fact, have been slightly greater.
Provan og at de forslag, De har fremsat, faktisk burde have været lidt mere omfattende.Men vi er som nævnt klar over de konsekvenser, dette kunne have fået for den ne sektor.
Provan cooperated in the application of the quota system are in fact still being inflicted with the co-responsibilty levy, and that is not fair and just.
Vi håber, at de antydninger, De er kommet med i formiddag i Deres bemærkninger om en mulig nedstøttelse på 8%, bliver kendt og erkendt af korn producenterne.
Having said that, we welcome the greater flexibility that you are proposing, and here, too, we will support you.
Hvad angår kvægopdrætterne, som var ude for en alvorlig ned gang i indkomsten for 1984, går Kommissionen ikke i detaljer og viser ingen medlidenhed : okse-, fåre-, svinekød — nul overalt.
The Commission makes no secret of its intentions either, as I note this justification for the 6% cut in citrus fruit prices — this will certainly encourage the producers to use the reconversion measures provided, it says.
For slet ikke at tale om vinavlerne, som lider samme skæbne.
What reconversion?
Hvad angår mælk, overstiger produktionen stadig forbruget med 14%, og et prisstop ville efter vor mening have været mere passende.
When Unicef says that one child in the world dies of hunger every two seconds, is it tolerable for the Commission to work at reducing our agricultural potential?
Den bør ses som et forbrugertilskud, og alt, man gør med hensyn til at øge oksekødsprisen, vil reducere forbruget og betyde mere oksekød til intervention og oplagring.
It should be seen as a consumer subsidy, and anything you do to increase the price of beef will cut consumption and put more beef into intervention and storage.
Det kan ikke være rig tigt.
That cannot be right.
Vi ønsker at forbruge det, vi producerer, og vi bør stimulære forbruget.
We want to consume what we produce, and we should be encouraging consumption.
Der foreligger tal, der helt klart viser, at kødforbruget i Det europæiske Fælles skab er faldet med 6'/2% gennem de seneste fem år.
There are figures available which show quite clearly that in the European Community the meat diet has been reduced by 6V2% in the last five years.
I Det forenede Kongerige er det lidt anderledes.
The UK story is slightly different.
Vi har holdt forbruget oppe, og jeg mener, at det er rimeligt at sige, at det er den variable præmie, der har gjort, at dette er sket.
We have maintained consumption, and I think it is reasonable to suggest that it is the variable premium that has allowed this to happen.
Det er en mærkelig måde at genoprette balancen mellem Syd- og Nord europa på.
Let us be courageous and let the industry respond to your lead!
Til olieeller proteinholdige planter, når de, selv om der er stor mangel på dem i EF, straffes med en garantitærskel og et prisfald?
And worse, some of your old proposals, such as the tax on oils and fats — worth 600 million ECU, I would remind you — and the restrictions on substitute products, have been dropped.
Jeg skal ikke i dag gå nærmere ind på dette problem.
Mr Pranchère (COM). — (FR) On 14 January, Mr Delors, with his hand on his heart, told this House how much the farmers needed to believe in Europe.
Når der ifølge UNICEF her i ver den dør et barn af sult hvert andet sekund, kan det så tolereres, at Kommissionen arbejder ihærdigt på at reducere vort landbrugs muligheder?
These fine words vanished when the Commission's price proposals were announced.
Der er mange andre aspekter, som vi kunne tale om her i formiddag, men lad os ikke fremme en destabilisering i landdistrikterne.
After the bad decisions of the European Councils of Fontainebleau and Dublin, these proposals constitute veritable provocation as far as the farmers are con cerned.
Lad os få en jævn overgang til de ændrede vilkår, som erhvervet står overfor.
If they were sanctified as they stand by the Ministers, they would mean a 4-6% drop in farm incomes in all the countries of the EEC.
Disse smukke ord blev til intet, da Kommissionens prisforslag blev fremlagt.
It is in these conditions and in the light of this series of problems that I shall be pro posing an average price increase of 5%, varied accord ing to product, this afternoon.
I landbrugsudvalget fremkaldte Deres redegørelse, hr. kommissær, for nylig en ægte »bronca« — som man siger i Sydfrankrig — et udtryk for landbrugernes ultifredshed, som kun kan vokse.
The milk producers, who are already heavily penalized by the quotas, are going to have another screw turned with a further authoritarian reduction of their output.
I et forsøg på at mildne chokvirkningen af Deres forslag gav De i samme åndedrag meddelelse om en seriøs drøftelse af den fælles landbrugspolitiks fremtid.
Animal farmers, who saw a serious drop in their income in 1984, get no facts and no feelings from the Commission — beef and veal, sheepmeat and pigmeat all get nothing.
Hvis De virkelig vil en sådan, var det muligt for Dem allerede nu at fremlægge nogle retningslinjer.
And let us not forget the wine growers, who are in the same boat.
Efter Det europæiske Råds dårlige beslutninger i Fontainebleau og i Dublin er de virkelig en provokation af landbrugerne.
In conclusion, I should say that the farmers do not need swingeing measures at the present time.
Samtlige producenter berøres i forskellig grad.
It is not these products that should get nothing, Mr Commissioner, it is you!
Kom missionen har kornet i kikkerten, den vil endnu en
Your proposals are such an insult to the farmers that you ought to get a vote of censure from this House!
Pranchère landbrugs muligheder.
The Commission document only contains one or two empty phrases.
samme tid betød et enormt fald i kornprisen, som i min region nåede op på 10%.
The differences in the trends in farm incomes from one region to another are very considerable.
Jeg har ikke noget imod, at man taler om orienteringspriser, som ikke stiger på grund af høstens omfang, men hvad agter man at gøre, for at de priser, som er fastsat, overholdees?
I know, for example, that there will be a big drop in the milk prod­ucers' incomes in dairy farming regions.
For jeg kan for mit vedkommende ikke acceptere adskillelsen mellem orienteringsprisen og interventionspriserne på markedet.
But the price increase you suggest is far below the cut in the volume of production attendant on the quotas.
På denne baggrund og under hensyntagen til alle disse problemer vil jeg i eftermiddag foreslå en gen nemsnitlig forhøjelse af priserne på 5 % afpasset efter de forskellige former for produktion.
It is not possible to block the ■ volume and the prices and to maintain the system of co­responsibility levies.
Til slut vil jeg sige, at landbrugerne i dag ikke har brug for kølleslag. Dem har de allerede fået tilstrækkelig mange af.
If you do not, Mr Delors lied to us and, unless we are given explana­tions, how do you expect us Belgians to explain an agricultural price freeze or a price cut when your own information suggests that incomes in Belgium are going down by 7%?
Det, de har brug for, er en rimelig indkomst og nye fremtidsudsigter.
We expect concrete proposals which explain your strategy.
Landbrugerne vil selv virke i den retning, og jeg være at finde ved deres side.
We shall make our pro­posals in committee but for the time being, we shall stick to the objective method of calculation and we call, very legitimately, for the 7.8% increase.
Selv om man til en vis grad kan begrunde Deres standpunkt med hensyn til korn, hvorledes skal man så begrunde den med hensyn til proteinholdige plan ter, som vi — i alt for høj grad — har mangel på? For hestebønner foreslår De os f.eks. et prisfald på over 6%.
Furthermore, on the matter of the budget, you say that the 19 300 million ECU which the Commission originally provided has been exceeded by a consider­able amount.
Hvorledes kan man begrunde sådanne forslag?
That is fine, but we have to be told how and why.