natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Parlamentet — og Fællesskabet i det hele taget — har faktisk allerede under landbrugsud gifterne vedtaget at yde støtte til Polen for 50 mio ECU i år.
To take effect, these modifications would require a qualified majority in Council but it is quite impossible for such a majority to be obtained since the governments have already reached agreement on this expenditure.
Vi er nemlig overbevist om, at en del af de under indtægter opførte midler, nemlig cirka en tredjedel, er Det europæiske Fællesskabs indtægter og overhovedet intet har at gøre med et eller andet lands nettoydelse.
Now for the fourth option : the only real alter native to simple approval is to amend the draft in respect of sections other than compulsory expenditure, i.e. by introducing amendments both on the revenue side and to non-compulsory expenditure.
Dette vås, der udbredes overalt, navnlig i Forbundsrepublikken, af visse kredse, må også i denne forbindelse eftertrykkeligt tilbagevises.
In that case, if we do not exceed the level of expenditure and, by analogy, the level of revenue shown in the existing budget for the current year, Parliament has the last word.
Spinelli. — (FR) Hr. formand, tillad mig at gå direkte til problemets kerne uden at opholde mig ved budget tets detaljer.
Other alternative proposals will no doubt be put to the vote in the House.
Stillet over for dette forslag til tillægsbudget kan Parlamentet vælge mellem følgende muligheder:
Their purpose will be to retain in the Community budget some of the supplementary revenue which appears in this amending budget.
Vedtage det som det, er eller forkaste det, hvilket er ensbetydende med at vedtage det. Hvis udgifterne i det i øjeblikket gældende budget for 1981 skæres ned, formindskes momsindtægterne faktisk automatisk med lige så meget.
In deciding which of the two options to follow — acceptance in one form or another or amendments to non-compulsory expenditure — Parliament should remember that for years it has been demanding an increase in expenditure on structural policies as opposed to expenditure to support agricultural prices.
Og den eneste forskel i det forud gående tilfælde er, at denne konstatering i stedet for at blive foretaget i december vil blive det i april.
Had the Commission lived up to its political responsibilities, it should itself have used the savings on the EAGGF guarantee section to propose equivalent increases in expenditure on structural policies.
Price. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg glæder mig over besparelserne på 724 mio ECU i garantiudgifter inden for landbruget.
It has taken pains not to do so and I would be the last to show surprise at this resigned attitude towards the possibility of achieving progress in the Community.
Det er klart, at en stor del af dem skyldes højere verdensmarkedspriser for vore over skud, men det falder også særligt i øjnene, at ca. to tredjedele af besparelserne ligger i mejerisektoren, der tidligere har givet os så mange problemer.
But if this Parliament, at the very time when it has the possibility to act, does not wish to give the lie to all that it has said and repeated when it has expressed its political views in resolutions, it must vote in favour of the amendment by Mr Aigner, Mr Irmer, Mr Spinelli and others and decide — I use the word advisedly — that revenue is to remain at the level shown in the current budget and that the expenditures saved will be assigned to Chapter 100 for structural policies which constitute non-compulsory expenditure.
Det fore kommer mig, at den nuværende tendens giver os muligheden for at nå til de ændringer af landbrugspolitikken, som Kommissionen har foreslået, i en atmosfære, hvor denne politik ikke er under budgetmæssigt pres, og jeg håber, at det vil danne en positiv baggrund for de drøftelser, der skal finde sted i de næste par uger og måneder.
The appropriations which we are not reasonably able to spend or commit in 1981 will be carried forward, in accordance with our regulations, to the 1982 budget which badly needs them.
Hvad angår udgiftssiden, forekommer det mig at være såre passende, at man foreslår, at en del af pengene bruges til ekstra fødevarehjælp til de mindst udviklede lande, netop fordi det, vi taler om, jo er penge, som vi har kunnet spare på vort landbrugs budget. Vor gruppe støtter ændringsforslaget.
We the Italian Communist and Allied Members will therefore vote in favour of the Aigner amendment and I would urge all of you — unfortunately there is prac tically no one in the House at present but I hope that some Members will read my words in the 'rainbow' tomorrow — to reflect on the credibility of Parliament: will it be a Parliament that demands respect for its own resolutions?
For det tredje kan Parlamentet ved første behandling foretage ændringer i de obligatoriske udgifter, som den der er foreslået med hensyn til mælkepulver.
But, ladies and gentlemen, do we really believe that we shall be able to force the hand of the Council in this way to obtain the entry of more substantial revenue in the 1982 budget?
At vedtage ændringer fører derfor til samme resultat som de to forudgående afgørelser.
No, it is not through stratagems of that kind that we shall win the day.
Lad os sammenfatte det: at vedtage, forkaste eller ændre dette forslag fører stadig til samme resultat. Det vil træde i kraft, som det er.
The develop ment of new common policies does not depend on these budgetary stratagems; it depends on the exist ence of a genuine political resolve in the governments.
Vi støtter også forslaget om 62 mio ECU til sociale foranstaltninger i stålsektoren, og jeg deler andre taleres synspunkt, nemlig at det er noget, der virkelig må bringes til udførelse som en hastesag.
The Liberal and Democratic Group will vote in favour of only two amendments: the first tabled by the Committee on Social Affairs and Employment seeks to reinstate the 62 million ECU for social action in the steel industry as proposed by the Commission. The
Jeg håber, at denne strid hurtigt kan bilægges, så pengene kan komme derhen, hvor der er brug for dem.
President. — I call the Liberal and Democratic Group.
Mødet mandag den 16. november 1981
In conclusion, Mr President, I wish to consider briefly the subject of aid for Poland.
Vi går ind for, at de opnåede besparelser i den ene eller den anden sektor skal gøre det muligt at oprette en reserve, som alt efter behov kunne bruges det følgende år, og vi har allerede sagt det.
We have the case of the British contribution in respect of which substantial figures had been quoted, although it now seems that the United Kingdom has, to put it frankly, received much more than it was owed.
Enhver ved dog, at en sådan fremgangsmåde først ville nødvendiggøre en forhandling med Kommissionen og Rådet for at nå frem til en ændring af finansforordningen, og vi mener, at der bør indledes en sådan forhandling.
This subject will be discussed on another occasion; but no doubt this is why, Commissioner, you showed a measure of humility to which we are not accustomed since the Commission generally indulges in self-satisfaction.
Andre alternative forslag vil sandsynligvis blive fore lagt forsamlingen.
We are naturally in favour of granting advantageous conditions for the supply of foodstuffs.
De har til formål på Fællesskabets budget at bevare visse tillægsindtægter, som frem kommer i ændringsbudgettet.
Unfortunately, and we are the first to regret this fact, this amendment was rejected by Parliament.
Det, som man ikke længere med rimelighed vil kunne bruge eller forpligte i 1981, vil i overensstemmelse med vore forordninger blive overført til regnskabsåret 1982, der i høj grad har behov derfor.
Is it appropriate to retable that amendment now under the 1981 budget?
Men kære kolleger, tror vi virkelig, at vi således kan tvinge Rådet til at opføre større indtægter på budgettet for 1982?
We well know that the conclusions which you have ' drawn — you mentioned I believe the figure of 727 million ECU — are the result of what has happened this year.
Det er ikke særlig realistisk. Rådet vil altid kunne slette dem til den tid.
We shall therefore say no more.
Nej, det er ikke ved at gøre sådanne øvelser, at vi vil vinde sagen.
We already spoke at length on this subject when the budget was discussed.
Udviklingen af ny fælles politik afhænger ikke af budgetsmæssige kunstgreb; den afhænger af en reel politisk vilje hos regeringerne. Men sandheden er, at Rådet ikke i øjeblikket ønsker at lancere ny politik, og alt drejer sig til sidst om denne grundlæggende kendsgerning.
We simply welcome the fact, Commissioner, that the requests for appropriations to cover the distillation of wine — which we tabled in connection with the first supplementary budget — were taken into account as the Commission had promised and we are grateful to you for that.
Vi italienske kommunister og beslægtede vil derfor stemme for hr. Aigners ændringsforslag, og jeg opfordrer alle — desværre er der næsten ikke andet end tomme pladser, men jeg håber, at en eller anden i morgen i »regnbuen« vil læse, hvad jeg har sagt — til at overveje, Parlamentets seriøsitet: vil det være et Parlament, der kræver respekt for sine beslutninger?
We do not think so because this would open the door to the tabling of a whole series of amendments taking up once again proposals which were rejected during the vote earlier this month. I would also remind you that the Commission clearly indicated to us in the Committee on Budgets that it had at its disposal at present all the funds which it considered necessary both for 1981 and 1982.
Til syvende og sidst vil den liberale og demokratiske gruppe begrænse sig til at stemme for to ændrings forslag: det første, der er stillet af socialudvalget, og går ud på at genopføre de 62 mio ECU til socialpolitikken inden for stålsektoren, som var foreslået af Kommissionen. Det andet, fra udviklingsudvalget, om at ændre kommentaren til artikel 923 om fødevare hjælp til de mindst udviklede lande.
We also approve the proposal concerning food aid to the least advanced countries and we share your regrets at the negative decison by the Council on social measures for restructuring of the steel industry; we shall support the amendment tabled by the Committee on Budgets seeking to reinstate the relevant appropria-
Hr. formand, jeg vil slutte med hurtigt at behandle spørgsmålet om hjælp til Polen.
You will therefore understand our reasons for abstaining when the vote is taken on this matter next Thursday.
Scrivener. — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger: så er vi der igen!
President. — I call- the Group of the European Progressive Democrats.
Vi er ganske vist ikke helt i samme situation, eftersom vi ikke i dag har den manøvremargen, vi havde sidste år, til vor rådighed.
Mr Fanton. — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, for the second consecutive occasion the Commission and Council are tabling a supplementary budget which reduces agricultural expenditure.
Naturligvis går vi helt ind for, at man giver fordelagtige købevilkår ved levering af fødevarer.
As to the amounts which have been saved, some are proposing that they should be refunded to the Member States while others maintain that they should be placed in reserve.
Det er i den grad sandt, at vi for fjorten dage siden ved afstemningen ved første behandling af forslaget for 1982 støttede PPE-gruppens ændringsforslag om at opføre et yderligere beløb på 10 mio ECU til transporten af denne hjælp til Polen.
That is why we should have preferred this budget to be dealt with in a single reading but, having regard to my comments just now on our position on the appropria tions for the steel industry, we shall vote in favour of this amendment.
Desværre — og vi er de første til at beklage det — forkastede Parlamentet dette forslag.
We shall also support the amendment by the Committee on Development altering the remarks against aid to the least advanced countries.
Er det godt igen i dag at stille dette ændringsforslag, men denne gang til budgettet for 1981?
When Commissioner Tugendhat spoke just now I was struck, as I think was the whole Assembly, by the modesty of his proposals. I use the term modesty in the sense of humility.
Målet er dog det samme: at forbinde dette ændrings budget nr. 2 for 1981 med behandlingen af budgettet for 1982, som skal til anden behandlung i næste måned.
Usually when a budget of this kind is presented the responsible bodies claim that it is thanks to their sound management practices.
Jeg vil derfor gerne sige det meget klart: den liberale og demokratiske gruppe vil gå imod de stillede ændringsforslag, som måtte gå i denne retning. Vi vil således være i logisk overensstemmelse med os selv, eftersom det allerede var den holdning, vi indtog i december sidste år.
In conclusion, Commissioner, we hope that when we come to discuss the problems of agriculture and appropriations earmarked for agriculture in future, you will not forget that the Community has experienced periods in which agricultural expenditure was not the burden about which we hear so many complaints today — quite the contrary.
Vi nægter endnu en gang at indlede en slem konflikt med Rådet.
President. — I call Mr de Keersmaeker.
På den anden side vil jeg gerne erindre om, at Kommissionen i budgetudvalget klart har angivet, at den i øjeblikket rådede over alle de beløb, som den anså for nødvendige, og det både til 1981 og til 1982.
But perhaps Commissioner Tugendhat is showing modesty for other reasons; perhaps as often happens, the Commission has been mistaken in its forecasts and was not optimistic enough about its capabilities or perspicacious enough about future events? We are now witnessing
Jeg glæder mig i øvrigt over, at budgetudvalget denne gang har truffet en klog afgørelse ved at forkaste ordførerens forslag om at opføre et beløb på 724 mio ECU, svarende til formindskelsen af udgifterne til
Mr de Keersmaeker. — (NL) Mr President, in refer ring to this amending budget I feel it appropriate to repeat the observations which we made two weeks ago in connection with the discussion of the budget,
til, at vi ville have ønsket, at dette budget kunne færdiggøres ved en enkelt behandling, men i betragtning af det, jeg sagde for lidt siden om vor holdning til bevillingerne til stålindustrien, vil vi stemme for dette ændringsforslag. Vi vil ligeledes stemme for udviklingsudvalgets ændringsforslag om at ændre kommentaren til støtten til de minst udviklede lande.
namely that there are grounds for satisfaction in that agricultural expenditure is being restricted and also grounds for dissatisfaction because the appropriations released in this way are not being better used in sectors other than agriculture or to follow more rapidly a specific policy in agriculture or else to dispose more rapidly of certain structural surpluses.
Fanton. — (FR) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, det er anden gang i træk, at Kommissionen og Rådet forelægger et tillægsbudget, der nedskærer landbrugs udgifterne.
We are not satisfied with the reasons cited for this. It is claimed that the legal basis is lacking or that no new policies should be developed through budgetary procedures, which is in fact correct, and that certain items should not be amended in such a way that utilization of the appropriations will not be guaranteed in the current budgetary year — and that argument too is theoretically correct.
Hr. kommissær, til sidst vil jeg sige, at vi håber, at De i fremtiden, når vi taler om landbrugsproblemerne og landbrugsbevillingerne igen, når tiden er inde, ikke vil glemme, at Fællesskabet har være ude i en periode, hvor landbrugsudgifterne ikke var en byrde, som man beklagede sig over, sådan som de er i dag, tværtimod.
However we are not satisfied with these arguments as a whole, since the true reasons for the failure lie in the fact that the Member States are satisfied with having to pay out less money to the European Community; above all the political resolve to take more drastic action is lacking.
For lidt siden, da kommissær Tugendhat havde ordet, blev jeg og, tror jeg, også Parlamentet slået af hans ords beskedenhed.
The VAT rate depends on the estimated expenditure and if a surplus remains because of savings and sound budgetary management, the appropriations concerned should remain with the Community and be carried forward to the next financial year.
Jeg vil sige beskedenhed i betydningen ydmyghed.
If that were not the case why should the Community have its own revenue at all?
I almindelighed undlader alle organer, der forelægger sådanne budgetter, ikke at sige : det er takket være vor gode forvaltning.
In that case we should have to go to the Member States and ask what expenditure they were prepared to authorize.
Men hr. Tugendhat undlod at indtage en sådan holdning, selv om han godt kunne have brystet sig over Kommissionens indsats.
They would then perhaps be kind enough to make the funds needed by us available through special contributions. tions.
Det er et spørgsmål, jeg tillader mig at stille ham, eftersom han for lidt siden sagde, at han eventuelt ville svare på vore spørgsmål.
The purpose of the amendments to the Financial Regulation in 1977 was to give the Community a greater weight of its own and to place it on an independent financial footing.
Medmindre kommissær Tugendhat skulle være beskeden af andre grunde, nemlig, at Kommissionen her som ofte har taget fejl i sine vurderinger og enten ikke har været tilstrækkelig optimisitsk med hensyn til sine egne evner eller tilstrækkelig klartskuende med hensyn til, hvad der ville ske? Og vi er i færd med at se et andet eksempel herpå, hr. kommissær.
All interpretations of the statutory provisions must be based on that fundamental principle. The Committee on Budgets' interpretation, which is of course possible in technical and legal terms, is politically false and hostile to the interests of the Community.
Det drejer sig om det britiske bidrag, i forbindelse med hvilket man havde fremmanet store tal, og i forbindelses med hvilket det i dag lader til, at hvis Storbritannien har modtaget meget, så lad os oprigtig sige, at man skyldte det mindre.
Let us be honest with ourselves: because of the present difficulties in the Member States, the established principle is now to go by the board because, regrettably enough, the German Finance Minister has problems in balancing his national budget and is therefore looking with some greed at our own surpluses.
De grunde, der angives hertil, tilfredsstiller os ikke.
President. — I call Mr Irmer.
Vi vil derfor ikke sige mere.
Nor is there any benefit to the taxpayer.
Vi har allerede talt meget om dette emne under behandlingen af budgettet.
Perhaps the national budget will be balanced and he will say: 'Fantastic, what a conjurer our Finance Minister is'.
Hr. kommissær, vi glæder os blot over, at anmodningerne om bevillinger til destillering af vin — som vi fremsatte i forbindelse med det første tillægsbudget — er taget i betragtning, således som Kommissionen havde lovet, og det takker vi for.
But if we no longer have a surplus next year, the VAT rate will have to be increased and then the national treasuries will lose an additional proportion of their VAT revenue.
Denne kortsynethed vil ikke hjælpe, for vi vil igen møde de uløste problemer lige om gadehjørnet, måske på et tidspunkt hvor der på grund af udviklingen af verdensmarkedssituationen vil være mindre plads.
Mr Inner. — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I am speaking today in my individual capacity and not on behalf of my group.
Dette forhindrer ikke, at vi er enige i, at budgetudvalget har stillet forslag om fødevarehjælp og om bidrag til EKSF, men vi anser det for at være utilstrækkeligt, hvorfor vi har stillet vort ændrings forslag om at opføre 50 mio yderligere RE på konto 9211 til hurtigt at skaffe mælkepulveret af vejen.
I would ask you all to vote in favour of the amendment tabled by Mr Aigner, Mr Spinelli and myself together with a number of colleagues from various political groups and of different nationalities.
Vi har endvidere indgivet et ændringsforslag, som må gøre det muligt ikke alene helt at overføre de indtægter fra medansvarsafgiften, som ikke bruges i indeværende år, til de formål, hvortil de er bestemt, nemlig afsætning og forbrug af mejeriprodukter, til 1982, men desuden at sikre, at de bevarer deres be stemmelse.
The purpose of our amendment is to ensure that the surplus on the EEC budget for the current year is not refunded to the Member States but carried forward to the following year or placed in reserve for use as additional appropriations in two years time.
Jeg anmoder Kommissionen og Europa-Parlamentets medlemmer om at være særlig op mærksom på disse ændringsforslag.
If the supplementary budget were to be adopted without our amendment in the form now advocated by
Med hensyn til problemet om de sparede beløb fore slår nogle at give dem tilbage til staterne, medens andre foreslår at lade dem udgøre en reserve.
Next Thursday our Foreign Minister Mr Genscher is to come here to explain his plan for European Union.
Formålet med forslaget er, at det overskud på EF-budgettet, der er opstået i år, ikke tilbagebetales til medlemsstaterne, men enten overføres som overskud til næste år eller opføres som reserve, for så eventuelt at have det til rådighed som overskud næste år igen.
If I may say so with great respect to Parliament, it is not, I think, a very good procedure — and I could choose stronger words than that — for people to attack a Commissioner or the Commission, to say they expect to have a reply and immediately to depart from the chamber without waiting for that reply.
Hvis tillægsbudgettet vedtages uden vort ændrings forslag i den udformning, som nu også støttes af budgetudvalget, ville dette betyde, at vort Parlament tager afsked med princippet om egne intægter og vender tilbage til princippet om medlemsstaternes bidragsydelser, som vi mente at have forladt i 1977.
I say, here and now, so that there is time for Mr Fanton to return, that I shall reply to him and I hope that he has the courtesy to be in his place when I do so.
Deschamps. — (FR) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, hvis de to minutters taletid, som jeg råder over, tages med i min gruppes, det vil sige i det europæiske folkepartis gruppes taletid, så er det, kan jeg forsikre Dem, den eneste politiske farvning af mit indlæg, for det har i sin inspiration og sin argumentation intet, virkelig intet politisk i sig.
Mr Deschamps. — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, if the two minutes speaking time available to me count towards the speaking time of my group, i.e. the Group of the European People's Party, that, I assure you, is the only political colouring of my speech, which is in no way based on party-political or biased arguments.
Det er udelukkende inspireret af humanitære overvejelser, og jeg ønsker, at det bliver hørt i den samme ånd af et Parlament, hvor man så ofte lægger vægt på respekten for menneskerettighederne.
It is inspired solely by humanitarian considerations and I hope'that Parliament will see it in that light since we often hear references in this House to respect for human rights.
Jeg vil faktisk tale om tillægsbevillingen på 10 mio til fordel for Polen.
I refer of course to the additional 10 million ECU for Poland.
Hvis det skulle forholde sig anderledes, hvorfor anslår vi så i det hele taget de egne indtægter?
I will start with Mr Arndt, who is also, of course, not here, although he too spoke quite strongly about the Commission.
Så bør vi dog straks være ærlige og spørge medlemsstaterne om, hvilke udgifter vi må afholde. Vi får så allernådigst gennem bidrag stillet penge til rådighed, som vi bruger.
I think that when one critcizes the Council for its absence — and I criticized the Council for its absence — and I critized the Council for its absence during my speech — it is important to bear in mind that it is quite a good idea to be present oneself.