natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Er Kommissionen i det hele taget troværdig, når den kan fremsætte så forskellige udtalelser?
In such cases the Treaty provides for a vote of no confidence !
Min anden betragtning angår de voldsomme udgifter. Man kan ikke totalt liberalisere produktionsleddet og totalt socialisere afsætningsleddet.
Why was the information you gave us yesterday not given to us in January ?
Enten indfører man restriktioner og forsøger at klare sig på verdens markedet eller også kræver man garantier samtidig med, at man accepterer restriktioner. Ingen restriktioner uden garantier, ingen garantier uden restriktioner.
Or is this a reflection of the deep rifts within the Commission and of its inability to agree on a common policy — one for which the Commission in its entirety bears responsibility ?
Kommissionen burde i de sidste mange år have haft mod til at sige dette klart.
In Item 2 of our question we wanted to know whether or not the Commission can meet this year's farm policy requirements with its 16.5 million ECU, and whether other areas will be affected.
Personligt har jeg i de sidste fem år sagt det i denne sal og i landbrugsudvalget, og jeg gentager: det er den eneste måde hvorpå den fælles landbrugspolitik kan reformeres således at den både bliver socialt acceptabel og samtidig nyttig, og således at den opfylder de nødvendige budgetmæssige behov.
Commissioner Tugendhat was kind enough to refer to his statements made in December — which we accepted at that time — without considering the remarks made by his President in his speech on the programme, namely that if all else fails the cost of the farm policy will also have to be borne by the non-agricultural sectors.
Det andet spørgsmål: det kommissionsmedlem, der har landbrug som forretningsområde — han refererede i går til vort venskab, hvilket jeg gerne vil bekræfte — mente, at han skulle samle laurbær til Kommissionen.
Mr Dalsager, Member of the Commission. — (DA) Mr President, a large number of questions have been raised which in fact belong more under the agricultural debate which we will be having at a forthcoming session.
Han sagde nemlig, at Kommissionen havde advaret allerede siden 1977. Det passer jo slet ikke!
Now my other question : the Commissioner responsible for agriculture — yesterday he referred to our friendship, which I gladly reaffirm — felt obliged to mark up points in the Commission's favour by saying that it had been giving us warnings since 1977.
Den, der dengang advarede imod en bestemt udvikling inden for landbrugssektoren, var budgetudvalget; og det daværende kommissionsmedlem, Deres forgænger, hr. Gundelach, var enig i vore betænkeligheder og fik således også Kommissionen over på vor side, sådan at begge parter forsøgte at gennemføre bestemte ting.
The warnings concerning certain trends in the agricultural sector came from the Committee on Budgets and the then Commissioner, your predecessor Mr Gundelach, who shared our misgivings and thus brought the Commission round to our way of thinking so that we tried to take action together.
Endnu en ting: De sagde, at Parlamentet hele tiden havde krævet mere end Kommissionen. Det passer heller ikke!
Again, you said that Parliament had been persistently more demanding than the Commission.
I 1982 og 1983 har vi i Parlamentet haft et lille flertal for andre prisforslag end Kommissionens, dette indrømmer jeg, og jeg anser det for beklageligt, for vi havde før indtaget en anden holdning.
In 1982 and 1983 I admit there was a slight majority in favour of different price proposals from those of the Commission : I feel that Parliament was acting to its discredit in that case, because on previous occasions we had adopted different positions.
Jeg kan endda stadig huske, at der var et år, hvor Kommissionen i forbindelse med drøftelserne i Rådet fremsatte forslag, der gik langt ud over, hvad man hidtil havde anbefalet.
Then he says that the Commission has been in office for a long time without doing anything, and finally he states that the Commission is incompetent, and that our failures are leading up to a vote of no confidence.
Hvis vi skal til at tale om, hvem der er skyld i hvad — min ærede, jeg var lige ved at sige, kollega Dalsager, for De var jo i 70'erne en gang medlem af Europa-Parlamentet —, skal man være meget forsigtig med sådanne påstande.
I must say that this is courageous talk from a Parliament which for the past five years at least has not supported the Commission when it pointed out the dangerous situation we were leading up to as regards dairy policy.
Jeg vil derfor ikke fremkomme med nogen bebrejdelser, men sige, at selv Kommissionen har tøvet længe nok med at gennem føre det nødvendige — for slet ikke at tale om Rådet.
But as I know, Mr Lange is a courageous man and from what I understood today he has the deepest lack of confidence in the Commission and the greatest optimism as regards Parliament's endeavours.
Lange (S), formand for budgetudvalget. — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg har på en vis måde efter mandat fra budgetudvalget stillet denne mundtlige forespørgsel, som kan give os svar på, hvorfor Kommissionen ikke reagerede i januar måned.
Until that time Parliament, again by a narrow majority, supported the Commission.
Kommissionsmedlemmet svarede en måned senere, og Kommissionen har med denne forsinkelse fremkaldt unødvendige konflikter.
I know, indeed, that one year, as part of its negotiations with the Council, the Commission submitted proposals which went considerably further than the recommendations it had given earlier.
Kommissionen· kunne allerede i januar have sagt, at den på grund af den usikre udvikling så sig ude af stand til at fremsætte bindende forslag — dette havde vi accepteret.
If we want to apportion blame, Mr Dalsager — I nearly addressed you as fellow Member, since you used to be a member of this House in the 1970s — we should be very careful about making such statements.
Jeg forstår ikke Kommissionens stædighed.
I have no wish to level any criticisms ; I just want to say that even the Commission — quite apart from the Council — has at times been quite slow in taking action.
Endvidere var Kommissionens opførsel i januar en ren og skær uhøflighed og underkendelse af Parlamentet.
We all know that we in Parliament have our problems, for we have said on countless occasions that the right place for discussion
Spørgsmålet er kun: hvorfor fremsætter Kommissionen så forskellige udtalelser — den ene gang kommissær Tugendhat, den anden gang Kommissionens formand, hr. Thorn?
Let me repeat, Mr President, that the Commission has warned Parliament and the Council at least since 1979 about developments in the dairy sector, but received no support from Parliament.
Jeg sagde allerede i går: Kommissionen samler minus points. I traktaten står der: mistillidsvotum!
But in truth we have also repeat edly had statements from Parliament to the effect that the Commission had not the courage to secure farmers' incomes.
Vi behøver ikke til ingens verdens nytte at gøre tingene vanskelige for os selv.
We simply lack the necessary agreement decisions here in Parliament and in the Council of Ministers, which in the final analysis must take the decision.
Med andre ord: Vil De være venlig at behandle Parlamentet på en anden måde, så vil der ikke være nogen vanskeligheder, og holde Dem venligst til kendsgerningerne og forsøg at bevare en troværdig Kommission; dette er kun muligt, hvis kommissions medlemmerne ikke modsiger hinanden.
Parliament has however — in any case in that field which I have the honour to administer on the Commission's behalf — repeatedly refused us this support which perhaps might have placed us in a different position vis-à-vis the Council, which indeed honestly speaking has not supported the Commission's standpoint either, when it was a question of gaining control over a certain section of agricultural production, the budgetary consequences of which were in danger of running amok.
Eller er dette et spejlbillede af hvor dybt splittet, i hvor høj grad Kommissionen i det hele taget er ude af stand til at blive enig om en fælles politik — som De alle kan gå ind for —? Hvis dette skulle være tilfældet, ville det være særdeles beklageligt, og Kommissionen ville ikke fortjene at sidde længere.
We all agree that this would be a dangerous development ; there is nobody who wishes this to happen. The Commission regards it as one of its main tasks to try to avoid this.
Jeg forstår, at hr. Woltjers betænkning vil indeholde et forslag om yderligere forhøjelse af priserne på visse produkter, først og fremmest dem der kommer fra de sydlige områder, og hr. Sutra spørger, om de nødvendige midler er til stede hertil.
I understand that Mr Woltjer's report contains a pro posal on further price increases for certain products, mainly those from southern regions, and Mr Sutra asks if the necessary funds are available for this.
Svaret er klart: nej, det er de ikke.
The answer is straightforward : no, the funds are not avail able.
Hvis Parlamentet skulle vedtage yderligere prisforhøjelser udover det, Kommissionen har fore slået, vil jeg allerede nu, for at man ikke bagefter skal komme og sige, at vi ikke har gjort opmærksom derpå, sige, at det er der ikke midler til.
If Parliament were to adopt further price increases on top of those proposed by the Commission, let me say already now, so that you do not come later and maintain that we did not point this out, that the funds are not available.
Der er ikke et budget til noget sådant.
There is no budget for such a thing.
Hvis nogen vil foreslå udgifter udover dem, som allerede er indeholdt i Kommissionens budget, og hvis nogen vil foreslå neddæmpning af de foranstaltninger, Kommissionen har foreslået med hensyn til medansvarsafgifter, produktionstærskler ovs., så mener jeg i hvert fald, at de samtidig er forpligtet til at anvise veje til at skaffe disse midler.
If somebody wants to propose expenditure in addition to that already included in the Commission's budget, and if somebody wants to propose a toning down of the measures proposed by the Commission with regard to coresponsibility levies, production thresholds, etc. then I believe in any event that they are obliged simultaneously to show ways to obtain these funds.
Ellers må man slå ind på den vej — og det er der ingen, der ønsker, Kommissionen aller mindst — at stille ændringsforslag om overførsel af yderligere midler fra forskellige fonde til landbrugs politikken . . .
Or one must take the course — and there is nobody, least of all the Commission, who wishes this, to present amendment proposals for the transfer of additional monies from various funds to the agricultural policy ...
Nej, det er ikke muligt, men jeg har ikke set betænkningen. ningen.
No, that is possible, but I haven't seen the report.
Dernæst siger han, at Kommissionen har siddet længe uden at gøre noget, og endelig siger han, at Kommissionen er uduelig, og at vi samler minusser sammen til et mistillidsvotum.
Yes, but it becomes necessary to use blunt instruments, when year after year an attempt is made to use a scalpel but the proposals are rejected.
Jeg må sige, at det er modigt sagt af et Parlament, som igennem mindst 5 år ikke har støttet Kommissionen, når vi har gjort opmærksom på, hvad det var for en farlig situation, vi var ved at bevæge os ud i med hensyn til mælkepolitikken. Men jeg ved godt, at hr. Lange er en modig mand, og jeg kunne forstå i dag, at han har den dybeste mistillid til Kommissionen og den største optimisme med hensyn til, hvad Parlamentet foretager sig-
I assure the honourable members that the longer Parliament and Council delay adoption of the instruments which the Commission has proposed as necessary to regulate the common agricultural policy and bring the situation under control — because week for week and month for month the problems are increasing — the worse will be the instruments which have to be applied.
Ja, men de stumpe instrumenter bliver nødvendigvis taget i anvendelse, hvis man år efter år har forsøgt at anvende en skalpel og ikke fået accept af sine forslag.
The question of storage must be decided in the light of the present market situation, where by and large we must acknowledge that sales of butter on external markets have almost come to a standstill.
Jeg kan forsikre de ærede medlemmer om, at jo længere Parlamentet og Rådet forsinker vedtagelsen af det, Kommissionen har fore slået som nødvendige instrumenter for at regulere den fælles landbrugspolitik og bringe situationen under kontrol — uge for uge og måned for måned vokser problemerne jo — des værre bliver de instrumenter, som må tages i anvendelse.
There are many countries which would perhaps like to buy butter, but do not have the necessary funds; for this reason we may, indeed it is probable that we will find ourselves in the situation at the close of this year, whereby partly owing to the lack of markets for some of our products — in this case butter in particular — partly because of our budget situation, will have greater stocks at year's end than we had at the begin ning of the year.
Jeg må gentage, hr. formand, at Kommissionen har advaret Parlamentet og Rådet i hvert fald siden 1979 om udviklingen på mælkeområdet uden at have fået støtte fra Parlamentet.
I think it was Mr Woltjer who said yesterday when we started this debate that a series of contacts were taking place between Member States, by passing the Commission so to speak.
Det er muligt, at vi har fået støtte fra budgetudvalget, og det er rigtigt, at vi også har fået udtalelser fra Parlamentet om, at vi skulle være forsigtige med landbrugsbudgettet.
I think that it is a dangerous development, when the European Council and the Council of Ministers think that the future agricultural policy should be discussed in the light of a total of up to ten different proposals from the ten Member States, thereby forgetting that the Treaties make it the Commission's sole and exclusive right to submit proposals and defend them, and that they can only be changed if all ten Member States agree to change them ; of course we can do nothing about this.
Men vi har sandelig også gang på gang fået udtalelser fra Parlamentet om, at Kommissionen ikke var modig nok til at sikre landmændenes indtægter. Vi måtte sætte priserne endnu mere op, end vi havde foreslået.
However, the Commission considers it is very important that it be recognized that it is the Commission who has the right to propose and that the discussions must take place in the light of the Commission's prop osals, and also that it is in the light of the Commission's proposals that a result must be reached, which not only adjusts, but saves the common agricultural policy and thereby in the final analysis perhaps the whole Community's reputation.
Hr. Eyraud var inde på en række landbrugsproblemer.
Mr Eyraud raised a number of agricultural problems.
Jeg vil vende tilbage til dem, og det siger hr. Eyraud at han også vil gøre, når vi kommer til den næste mødeperiode, hvor vi skal behandle problemerne om den automatiske afvikling af de monetære udligningsbeløb.
I will return to them, and Mr Eyraud says that he would like to do likewise, when we come to the next session, where we will be discussing the problems of the automatic dismantling of the monetary compensatory amounts.
Det er et godt forslag.
The proposal is a good one.
Kommissionen vil støtte det.
The Commission will support it.
Det er altså til dels et spørgsmål om at fordele ansvaret.
We have put forward proposals on
Dalsager
Dalsager oral question with debate (Doc.
Om: Udgivelse af ECU-mønter
Subject : Issue of ECU coins
Hvornår udgiver Kommissionen eller et af den udpeget organ en ECU-mønt i flere værdier med guld- og sølvandele?
When will the Commission, or an agency operating on its behalf, issue ECU coins of varying denominations, each containing a proportion of gold or silver ?
Kunne disse midler også anvendes som Fællesskabets egne indtægter?
Mr Woltjer (S). — (DE) I only want to ask if the Commissioner has seen my report.
1-1314/83) af Delorozoy for den liberale og demokratiske gruppe til Kommissionen:
1-1314/83) by Mr Delorozoy on behalf of the Liberal and Democratic Group :
Om: Anvendelse af ECU i forbindelse med den interne samhandel i EF
Subject : Use of the ECU in intraCommunity trade
Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne takke for denne debat.
President. — The debate is closed.1
Jeg tror, at det er meget vigtigt, at Parlamentet gør sig sin stilling helt klar og er rede til at støtte Kommissionen i den politik, vi har forelagt.
Financial and banking establishments in certain Member States have been seeking for some time to promote the use of the ECU, in particular, by accepting deposits, granting loans and issuing bonds in ECU.
Til alle, der på baggrund af landmændenes økonomiske situation har bekym ringer, vil jeg gerne sige: Kommissionen deler disse bekymringer, men hvis ikke vi tager de nødvendige skridt nu, så bliver de økonomiske konsekvenser for vore landmænd i fremtiden langt alvorligere end dem, vore forslag stiller dem i udsigt.
To this end, can the Commission give details of the steps which could be taken — particularly as regards information — to encourage a rapid and widespread increase in the use of the ECU in operations carried out by users (financial institutions and undertakings), as a step on the road towards financial integration ?
Woltjer (S). — (DE) Jeg ville blot spørge, om kommissæren også har læst min betænkning.
President. — The next item is the report (Doc.
(Bifald — Munterhed)
— oral question with debate (Doc.
I nogen tid har finans- og pengeinstitutter i visse medlemsstater forsøgt at fremme anvendelsen af ECU, navnlig i forbindelse med ind- og udlån samt udstedelse af obligationer i ECU.
Subject : Creation of a European savings account denominated in ECU in all the Community countries
En øget anvendelse af ECU som betalingsmiddel og valuta i kontrakter og den interne samhandel vil kunne bidrage til at skabe en vis stabilitet i internationale transaktioner.
Mr Herman (PPE), rapporteur. — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, we are very pleased that the majority in this Parliament voted, on Tuesday evening, in favour of the draft treaty for European union.
Man kan således kun støtte en mere udbredt anvendelse af ECU.
Political union implies monetary union, in the same way as monetary union needs political union if it is to last.
Kan Kommissionen på baggrund heraf gøre nærmere rede for, hvilke foranstaltninger der kan
In view of the need to give greater credibility to the wider use of the ECU within the European Community and to provide European savers with a guarantee against losses in value or devaluation of the national currencies, is the Commission prepared to propose the creation of a European savings account denominated in ECU in all the Community countries ?
(') Afgørelse om anmodningen om afstemning snarest muligt: Se protokollen.
Will it consider the arrangements for introducing such an account bearing in mind the Member States' prerogatives in the matter of taxation ?
Herman tional valuta ikke ville kunne leve med de snævre udsvingsmarginer, som systemet indebærer, uden at gøre indhug i Bank of England's reserver.
Herman should be possible to make some progress, on the condition that the Member States agree to place the Community's medium-term interests before the protection of very shortterm interests.
Denne betænkning er et led i Europa-Parlamentet's nuværende bestræbelser på at skabe betingelserne for et virkeligt økonomisk opsving i Europa.
Europe — which imports more, exports more and saves more than the United States — would be perfectly able and entitled to share with the US the privilege of issuing a major reserve currency.
Det er tredje gang i løbet af denne samling, at vi drøfter dette emne.
All it needs is the will and to organize itself accordingly.
Disse indvendinger kan imødegås derved, at man tillader bredere udsvingsmarginer, som det er tilfældet for den italienske lire; for så vidt angår kontrollen med pengemængden har andre medlemslande bevist, at dette hensyn ikke var uforeneligt med deltagelse i EMS.
It is necessary to stress this again : without the stabilization and consolidation of the European Monetary System and without a gradual acceptance of the use of the ECU, I consider that any European economic revival will remain precarious and more susceptible to external influences.
For i denne tid, der er præget af skepsis og tvivl med hensyn til Fællesskabets og dets medlemsstaters evne til at overvinde de mangfoldige vanskeligheder og fortsatte kriser, beviser det forhold, at det europæiske valutasystem fungerer, om end det langt fra opfylder de forventninger, man stillede til det, at Europa, når det vil, kan finde frem til effektive instrumenter.
If the proposals which the Parliament is making were accepted, we would have no difficulty in making the ECU the other worldwide currency and we could pay for our oil in ECUs instead of being obliged to pay in dollars.
Vi tror, at den engelske indstilling snarere er symbolsk national og især skyldes politiske hensyn.
Mr J. Moreau (S). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, to start with I would like to make two points.
Vi beklager naturligvis, at det ikke er muligt at gå over til anden fase, som den oprindelig var planlagt, og som Parlamentet havde krævet, specielt i forbindelse med vedtagelsen af vor kollega hr. Ruffolo's betænkning.
The assessment of the operation of the European Monetary System shows that the system has permitted greater concertation between governments on the economic, monetary and budgetary policies carried out in their countries.
Uden dog at slå sig til tåls hermed, må man i dag notere sig, at dette er umuligt og i stedet fremsætte forslag, som på engang gør det muligt at forbedre og styrke det eksisterende system og skabe betingelserne for et nyt fremskridt.
Consequently, I support the proposals put forward in the report concerning the introduction of an indicator system which would allow the Commission to inter vene as soon as the warning lights turn red.
De forenede Stater nyder et fantastisk privilegium derved, at de udsteder den internationale valuta; de behøver ikke at bekymre sig urimeligt om deres betalingsbalance, fordi de betaler deres underskud med den valuta, som de selv udsteder. De er således unddraget de hårde realiteter, som vejer tungt på alle andre landes økonomi. Dette privilegium medfører forpligtelser, som i øjeblikket ikke opfyldes.
I would point out that debates on economic and monetary affairs are important in Parliament, and that we have had great difficulty, during the life of this Parliament, in getting such debates scheduled at times when a reasonable number of Members could actually attend them, and I note that this has not changed.
Det europæiske valutasystems fremtid er i Ministerrådets hænder, og det ønsker jeg at understrege, selv om dette er fraværende i dag.
The second point — and I do not want to fall into the habits of parliamentary language — is that I consider Mr Herman's report to be a comprehensive report on the problem of the European Monetary System in its present form.
Europa — som importerer mere, som eksporterer mere og som sparer mere op end De forenede Stater — ville have alle muligheder og også ret til med dem at dele det privilegium, det er at udstede en interna tional reservevaluta.
This report forms part of the European Parliament's current move aimed at the creation of suitable conditions for genuine economic revival in Europe.
Men Europa må også have viljen til det og indrette sig derefter.
It is the third time that we have discussed this topic during the life of this Parliament.
Det må tydeligt understreges igen og igen, at ethvert økonomisk opsving i Europa efter min opfattelse vil være usikkert og mere udsat for indflydelse udefra uden en stabilisering af det europæiske valutasystem og en konsolidering og en gradvis tilvænning til at anvende ECU.
As a matter of fact, in this time of scepticism and doubt with regard to the ability of the Community and its Member States to overcome the numerous difficulties and successive crises, the operation of the European Monetary System, although far from achieving everything expected of it, proves that Europe can give itself effective instruments when it wants.