natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg beklager dybt, at Parlamentet har stemt imod, at den bedst mulige bortskaffelsesform skal vælges.
I deeply regret the decision of the House to vote against the requirement that the best possible method of disposal must be selected.
Den bedst mulige bortskaffelsesform er den, der yder borgeren mest beskyttelse.
The best possible method of disposal is the one that gives the public the greatest protection.
Jeg beklager også, at vi ikke får udleveret listen over virksomhederne.
I also regret that we will not be given the list of undertakings.
Det blev desværre afvist af en koalition, som har svoret sig sammen mod den enkelte borger.
This has unfortunately been rejected by a coalition which has conspired against the public.
At vi ikke før nogen oplysninger om de midlertidige oplagringer, vil netop føre til det, som jeg fra begyndelsen har frygtet, nemlig at vi har lavet en forordning, som skal berolige borgerne, men at der ellers desværre intet vil ske.
The fact that we are not to be given any information on inter mediate storage will result in precisely what I feared from the outset : we have approved a regulation designed to pacify the man in the street, but I regret to say that otherwise nothing will be done.
Weber (S). — (DE) I al sørgmodighed over at de farlige stoffer ikke kommer med i denne forordning, vil jeg gerne henvise til, at Parlamentet og Kommissionen tilsyneladende er meget fornuftigere end medlemsstaterne.
Mrs Weber (S). — (DE) Sad though I am at the removal of any reference to dangerous substances from this regulation, I should like to point out that Parliament and the Commission are obviously far more sensible than the Member States.
Tilsyneladende var medlemsstaterne ikke i stand til at opstille fornuftige regler for den grænseoverskridende transport af farligt affald.
The Member States have obviously been incapable of finding a sensible arrangement for the transfrontier transport of hazardous wastes.
Af den grund bifalder jeg i høj grad, at Parlamentet kræver en forordning.
I therefore very much welcome the fact that Parliament has called for a regulation.
Jeg tror, at vi dermed har betrådt en vej til i fremtiden at forhindre hændelser i stil med Seveso-affaldet.
I believe that this is the right way to prevent a recurrence of in cidents like that involving the Seveso waste.
Alligevel beder jeg de af mine kolleger, der har afvist at inddrage de farlige stoffer, om at gøre sig klart, hvordan de vil forklare befolkningen, at et farligt produkt betragtes ud fra sit anvendelsesformål, hvis en ulykke er indtrådt.
I would nevertheless ask those of my colleagues who were opposed to the inclusion of dangerous substances to give some thought to how they intend to explain to the public that a dangerous product is considered in terms of its intended use when an accident happens.
Hvad sker der egentlig andet, hvis der sker en ulykke med dioxin på vejen, hvis det skal genanvendes, end hvis det skal deponeres som affald?
If there is a road accident involving dioxin, what difference does it make whether it is to be reused or stored as waste ?
Jeg har hidtil hverken i udvalget eller i Parlamentet fået svar på det, men jeg håber, at dette måske i den efterfølgende offentlige diskussion bliver tilfældet.
So far I have not been given an answer to this question, either in the committee or in Parliament, and I hope to receive one in the forthcoming public debate.
Cottrell (ED). — (EN) En kort bemærkning, hr. formand.
Mr Cottrell (ED). — A brief observation, Mr President.
Kunne De ikke bede de medlemmer, der oplæser stemmeforklaringer, om at indgive dem skriftligt, således at Parlamentet ikke skal trættes med denne uattraktive forelæggelse af medlemmernes kommentarer?
Would you consider requesting Members who read explanations of vote to this House to submit them in writing so that the House is not subjected to the tiresome chore of listening to this unattractive way of presenting one's remarks ?
Formanden. — Hr. Cottrell, vi har hørt Deres bemærkning, men det står ethvert medlem frit for mundtligt eller skriftligt at afgive sin stemmeforklaring.
President. — Mr Cottrell, we have taken note of your observation, but every Member of the House is free to give his explanation of vote orally or in writing.
Chanterie (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg protesterer imod ordførerens udtalelser om min gruppe.
Mr Chanterie (PPE). — (NL) Mr President, I object to the rapporteur's attack on my group.
Jeg mener, at sådanne ord er en ordfører uværdig.
I think such speech is unworthy of a rapporteur.
De Gucht (L), skriftlig. — (NL) Fællesskabslovgivningen udviser faktisk ikke så få tomrum, når det drejer sig om transport af farligt affald.
Mr De Gucht (L), in writing. — (NL) Community legislation shows some shortcomings in the transport of dangerous wastes.
Hvilke fantastiske situationer det kan føre til, fremgår af de seneste begivenheder.
Recent events have shown the kind of incredible situations that can lead to.
At foranstaltninger trænger sig på, er klart, og i den forstand støtter jeg også betænk ningen.
It is obvious that measures must be taken and with that in mind I support the report.
I diskussionen om, hvorvidt det skal ske gennem et direktiv eller gennem en forordning, går jeg ind for forordningen.
In the debate on whether it is best done by a directive or a regulation, I opt for a regulation. tion.
Et direktiv skal jo først bygges ind i de nationale lovgivninger.
A directive has always to be incorporated into the national legislation.
På rent fællesskabsplan kan et direktiv måske hurtigere udfærdiges, men bagefter er det en hel del vanskeligere at kontrollere de forskellige medlemsstater med hensyn til dets gennemførelse.
Purely from the Community angle a directive may seem to be drawn up more quickly, but afterwards it is much more difficult to check the various Member States in their compliance with it.
En forordning finder direkte anvendelse.
A regulation is directly applicable.
Den kendsgerning, at en forordning kommer langsommere i stand, kan man imødegå ved gentagne gange at anspore Kommisionen til at fremskynde sit arbejde i denne forbindelse.
Any objection that a regulation is more laborious to draw up can be met by the Commission being constantly urged to speed up its work here.
Forordningen må ikke omfatte for mange punkter.
The regulation should not contain too many points.
Ud fra praktiske overvejelser må det anbefales først at klare de mest afgørende punkter for så senere — eventuelt gennem direktiver — at bearbejde de foreliggende data yderligere.
For practical considerations it is advisable to settle the crucial issues and leave the details to be worked out later, possibly by means of directives.
Skovmand (CDI), skriftlig. — De 41 tønder med dioxin-indhold fra Seveso har skabt en både forståelig og berettiget bekymring for det giftige affald, der flyttes fra det ene land til det andet.
Mr Skovmand (CDI), in writing. — (DA) The 41 drums of dioxin waste from Seveso have generated both understandable and justified concern over the toxic waste which is moved from one country to another.
Det er i dette lys, man skal se det foreliggende forslag om grænseoverskridende affald.
It is in this light that the present proposal on transfrontier movements of waste should be seen.
Forslaget fra fru Van Hemeldonck ser umidelbart fornuftigt ud.
Mrs Van Hemeldonck's proposal seems at first sight to be a reasonable one.
Alligevel kan vi i Folkebevægelsen mod EF ikke stemme for det.
Nevertheless we in the Folkebevaegelse mod EF (People's movement against the EEC) cannot vote for it.
Fordi hele EFs virke trækker i den stik modsatte retning.
Because the entire activity of the European Community moves in the diametrically opposed direction.
Hvis et land vil beskytte sig mod gifte, må det have ret til at forhindre, at giftigt affald fra andre lande kommer ind i landet.
If a country wants to protect itself against toxic hazards, it must be able to prevent toxic waste from entering it from other countries.
Det kræver en effektiv inspektion ved grænserne.
This requires effective inspection at the frontiers.
Men EF søger gang på gang at svække denne inspektion.
But the EEC tries time and again to weaken such inspections.
Derudover må landet søge at forhindre import af varer, der indeholder giftige stoffer eller er fremstillet ved hjælp af giftige stoffer.
In addition a country must seek to prevent the import of goods which contain toxic substances or are produced with the aid of toxic substances.
Også det søger EF at forhindre under henvisning til, at der er tale om tekniske handelshindringer.
The EEC also tries to prevent this on the grounds that it is a technical barrier to trade.
Kort og godt: Her som i andre sager kan vi slå fast, at EF er en fjende af bedre miljø.
In short : here, as in other connections, we may conclude that the Community is hostile to a better environment.
— FOR ændringsforslag nr. 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118 et 119;
— IN FAVOUR OF amendments Nos. 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119;
— IMOD ændringsforslag nr. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ændr., 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 et 43.
— AGAINST amendments Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14/rev., 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43.
Adamou (COM). — (GR) Dalsassbetænkningen om ethanol fremstillet af landbrugsprodukter viser den forvirring, som eksisterer i denne sektor.
Mr. Adamou (COM). — (GR) The Dalsass report on ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin demonstrates the confusion that exists in that sector.
I realiteten er der tale om en prinlig anstrengelse fra Kommissionens side for at finde en udvej for en række land brugsprodukter.
In essence, it is a frantic attempt by the Community to find an outlet for a whole range of agricultural products.
Men situationen kompliceres endnu mere ved inddragelsen af kunstig ethanol, som udkonkurrerer landbrugsethanol og truer den med udslettelse.
However, the situation is further complicated by the intrusion of synthetic alcohol, which competes against ethyl alcohol and threatens to eliminate it.
De foran staltninger, som Kommissionen foreslår, og som Dalsassbetænkningen og beslutnings forslaget er enige i, vil få alvorlige negative følger for lande som Grækenland, hvis de saltes endeligt i kraft.
Nevertheless, the measures proposed by the Commission, and with which the Dalsass report and resolution are in agreement, will if implemented have serious negative consequences for countries such as Greece.
Vinavl, som beskæftiger 400 000 landbofamilier, vil bogstavelig taget blive problematisk, og det samme galder ethanolproduktionen, der anvendes som råstof i de græske landbrugsprodukter.
Viniculture, which occupies some 400 000 agricultural families, will become really problematic as also will the production of alcohol that uses Greek agricultural products as raw materials.
Vi mener, at for at den græske vinavl og dens produkter kan overleve i et Fællesskab, som har et overskud på 120 % i denne sektor, må den græske regering træffe nationale beskyttelsesforanstaltninger.
However, we believe that if Greek viniculture and its products are to survive in a community which is 120 % in surplus in this sector, the Greek government will have to institute protective measures at a national level.
Kun på den måde kan problemet »landbrugsprodukter, landbrugsalkohol, alkoholiske drikke« løses.
Only this will solve the problems of 'agricultural products, agricultural alcohol, alcoholic drinks'.
Af den grund vil vi stemme imod Dalsassbetænkningen og beslutningsforslaget, som vi gjorde det i landbrugsudvalget.
For this reason, as we did on the Committee on Agriculture, we shall vote against the Dalsass report and resolution.
Hord (ED). — (EN) Jeg tror, at Parlamentet lige har været vidne til noget af en kärade, hvor vi har fordybet os i, hvis det er det rette ord, et vigtigt nyt forslag til en ethanolforordning.
Mr Hord (ED). — I think that this House has just witnessed something of a charade where we have been concerning ourselves, if that is the right word, with an important new proposal for an ethyl alcohol regulation.
Det er ikke noget, vi gør hver måned, og det forekommer mig, at den kärade, vi lige har overværet, svarer til rodet i Kommissionens forslag og de modsigende
It is not something that we do every month, and it seems to me that the charade that we have just witnessed matches the shambles of the Commission's proposals and the contradictory and complicated amendments that we have seen — some 70 of them — from Parliament's Committee on Agriculture.
De, der tidligere deltog i debatten, vil være bekendt med de vægtige forbehold, hvad angår kommissionsforslagenes lovgyldighed, for så vidt som Parlamentet gennem sit retsudvalg allerede har peget på, at de ikke er i overensstemmelse med traktaten.
Those who were in the debate earlier will be aware of the substantial reservations about the legality of the Commission's proposals insofar as Parliament has already indicated through its Legal Affairs Committee that they do not conform to the Treaty.
Kommissionens forslag er irrelevante, og de er bekostelige.
The Commission's proposals are irrelevant and they are expensive.
Vi ser i stadig stigende grad, at løsningen på det betragtelige overskud er destillation, og jeg tror, at Parlamentet vil fortryde, at det lod sig rive med af den absurde række komplicerede og ændrede forslag, som er totalt irrelevante for Fællesskabet.
We see increasingly that the solution to the substantial surplus is to distil it and I believe the Parliament will rue the day when they waved through this absurd set of complicated and amended proposals which are totally irrelevant to the Community.
Jeg tror, at Parlamentets medlemmer ville få en bedre modtagelse udenfor, hvis de ikke var besat af landbrug, men bekymrede sig om de 88 % af Europas befolkning, der ikke er direkte impliceret i landbrug, men tjener til livets opretholdelse uden for landbrugssektoren.
I submit that the Members of this House, if they were not obsessed with agriculture but concerned themselves with the 88 % of the people of Europe who are not directly involved in agriculture but secure their living from non-agricultural means, would get a better reception when they go outside.
Om et år skal vi stå ansigt til ansigt med vælgerne: 88 % af dem ønsker en medsattelse af landbrugsudgifterne, og jeg tror ikke, at vi vil høste nogen som helst respekt, før der i Parlamentet er et vist ansvar over for hele Europas befolkning.
In a year's time we shall be facing the electorate : 88 % of them want to see agricultural expenditure reduced, and I believe that until such time as there is a degree of responsibility in this House towards all the people of Europe, we shall not get any respect whatsoever.
Af alle disse årsager afviser min gruppe helt og holdent ikke blot Kommissionens forslag, men også Dalsassbetænkningen.
For all these reasons, my group utterly rejects, not only the Commission's proposals, but also the Dalsass report.
Vi vil stemme imod.
We shall vote against.
Sir Fred Catherwood (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil blot gerne sige til de kolleger, som vi i den grad er enige med, at vi beklager, at denne normalt venlige og hjælpsomme gruppe har været temmelig vanskelig i aften.
Sir Fred Catherwood (ED). — Mr President, I would simply like to say to colleagues with whom we agree so much that we are sorry that this normally agreeable and helpful group has been rather difficult tonight.
Men vi anmodede faktisk om, at denne afstemning ikke blev foretaget aftenen før det engelske valg.
But we did ask that this vote not be taken on the eve of our General Election.
Den blev foretaget aftenen før valget, og hvis der havde været flere af os til stede, ville det måske ikke have været så uheldigt eller vanskeligt.
It was taken on the eve of our General Election and perhaps if there had been more of us here we would not have been quite so awkward or difficult.
Derfor håber vi ikke, når der er valg i et andet land, f.eks. Italien, at vi vil få en afstemning om vin lige inden det italienske valg, hvor der ingen italienere er til stede.
So we hope that when somebody else has an election, like the Italians, we will not have a vote on wine just before the Italian election when none of the Italians are here.
Jeg tror, at det vigtigste for os er det, der blev fremført af hr. Hord og det er: på et tidspunkt, hvor Fællesskabet er ved at løbe tør for midler, hvor det ser ud, som om landbrugsudgifterne vil opbruge hele budgettet, og hvor vi har udestående landbrugsforpligtelser, er det ikke hensigtsmæssigt at indføre en bekostelig ordning som denne.
I think that the main point that we would like to make is the point that was made by Mr Hord and that is, at a time when the Community are about to run out of money ; at a time when we have open-ended commitments on agriculture, that is not the time to introduce an expensive regime like this.
Hvis den havde været mere rimelig, hvilket det engang så ud til, at den ville blive, kunne vi måske have givet vor tilslutning hertil.
It could have been that if it had been more reasonable, as it at one time seemed it was going to be, we could have gone along with it.
Men den er blevet urimelig, den er blevet uret mæssig tung, og derfor vil vi bestemt stemme imod den.
But it was made unreasonable ; it was made unduly heavy and, therefore, we will certainly vote against it.
I. Spørgsmål til Rådet
I. Questions to the Council
Om: Spaniens tiltrædelse af Fællesskabet og dets anerkendelse af Israel
Subject : Spanish accession to the Community and Spanish recognition of Israel
Er Rådet ikke enigt i, at fuld diplomatisk anerkendelse af Israel fra Spaniens side i betragtning af associeringsaftalen mellem Fællesskabet og Israel bør være en forhåndsbetingelse for Spaniens tiltrædelse af Fællesskabet?
In view of the Association Agreement between the Community and Israel does the Council not agree that full diplomatic recognition of Israel by Spain should be a precondition of Spanish accession to the Community ?
Det grundlæggende princip i tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne er, at den ansøgende stat fuldt ud skal anerkende den ved tiltrædelsen gældende »acquis communautaire«.
The basic principle underlying the accession negotiations is complete acceptance by the applicant State of the 'acquis communautaire' as it stands at the time of accession.
Det følger heraf, at de problemer, som måtte opstå for såvel den ansøgende stat som for Fællesskabet, skal søges løst under tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne, ikke ved ændring af Fællesskabets retsregler, men udelukkende ved indførelse af overgangsforanstaltninger eller midlertidige undtagelser, som skal være af en sådan art, at de sikrer ligevægten i det samlede kompleks af gensidige fordele.
This means that problems arising for either the applicant State or the Community during accession negotiations should be solved not by amending Community rules but only by interim measures or temporary derogations, while preserving an overall balance of mutual advantages.
I overensstemmelse med disse principper skal Spanien ved tiltrædelsen af Fællesskaberne tiltræde de med middelhavslandene indgåede aftaler, herunder aftalen med Israel, idet disse aftaler'indgår i »l'acquis communautaire«.
It is in accordance with these principles that Spain, in acceding to the Community, will be required to accept the Mediterranean Agreement, including the Agreement with Israel, as these form part of the 'acquis communautaire'.
Spørgsmålet om de diplomatiske forbindelser mellem de enkelte medlemsstater og tredje lande henhører ikke som sådan under Rådet, men under den pågældende medlemsstats eget kompetenceområde.
The recognition of a third country by a Member State comes within the competence not of the Council but of the State concerned.
Om : Opførelse af et atomkraftværk ved en medlemsstats grænser
Subject : Installation of a nuclear reactor at the frontiers of a Member State
Kan formandskabet give oplysninger om den fremgang, der er sket med hensyn til forslag til forordning om indførelse af en obligatorisk høringsprocedure i tilfælde af opførelse af et atomkraftværk ved en medlemsstats grænser?
Can the Council state what progress has been made with regard to the proposal for a regulation on setting up a compulsory consultation procedure in the event of the installation of a nuclear power station at the frontiers of a Member State ?
Det forslag til forordning, som det ærede parlamentsmedlem henviser til, er stadig til behandling i Rådet.
The proposal for a regulation to which the Honourable Member refers is still being considered by the Council.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
Question No 10 by Mr Martin
Om: Fiskeri i Middelhavet
Subject : Mediterranean fisheries
Har Rådet besluttet sig til at supplere den fælles fiskeripolitik med særlige foranstaltninger for fiskeriet i Middelhavet, således som Europa-Parlamentet har krævet?
Has the Council decided to supplement the common fisheries policy with a chapter on 'Mediterranean fishing' as requested by the European Parliament ?
Nødvendigheden af fællesskabsforanstaltninger er allerede blevet nævnt i Rådet på samlingen den 25. januar 1983.
The need for Community measures has already been acknowledged by the Council at its meeting of 25 January 1983.
I overensstemmelse med den resolution om tilpasning af kapaciteten og forbedring af produktiviteten inden for fiskerisektoren, som Rådet vedtog samme dag, har Kommissionen forelagt forslag, der omfatter fiskeristrukturerne og udviklingen af akvakulturen i Middelhavet.
In furtherance of the resolution adopted that same day by the Council on the adjustment of capacities and the stepping up of productivity in the fisheries sector, the Commission has submitted proposals on fishing structures and the development of aquaculture in the Mediterranean.
Disse forslag skal gennemgås af Rådet på dets samling den 20.—21. juni 1983.
These are to be considered by the Council at its next meeting on 20/21 June 1983.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
The Council has noted with interest the resolution adopted by the European Parliament on 10 February 1983 on fisheries policy in the Mediterranean.
Såfremt Rådet vedtager artikel 29, tilkommer det Kommissionen som ansvarlig for forvaltningen af de forskellige fællesskabsfonde at undersøge, om der som led i de integrerede foranstaltninger skal forelægges forslag for Rådet, eller om de eksisterende instrumenter er et tilstrækkeligt grundlag for den aktion, som det ærede parlaments medlem omtaler.
In view of the adoption by Parliament of the von der Vring Resolution (') on Integrated Development Operations, will the Council call on the Commission to draft proposals immediately for the implementation of the policies called for, particularly in relation to
Det forlyder, at industri- og mineprojektet i Carajás i Brasilien til en værdi af £ 35 mia støder på visse lokale vanskeligheder.
It would appear that the £ 35 billion industrial and mining development Carajás project in Brazil is running into a certain local difficulty.
Den indfødte befolkning i området — de såkaldte »posseiros« — fordrives ofte med støtte fra militærstyret i denne region.
The local indigenous people, who are »the occupiers of the land, the 'posseiros', are being driven off their land often with the backing of the special military government in the region.
Det særlige ved Carajas-projektet i Goias er, at det modtager økonomisk bistand fra Det europæiske Fællesskab.
What is special about the Carajás project in Goias is that it is financially backed by the European Community.