natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Men vi bygger på sandgrund, for noget, der fortjener navnet »energipolitik«, en sammensmeltning af regler og ideer, findes der endnu ikke i Fællesskabet.
What is needed is an information campagin to bring home to the general public that even highly radioactive waste can be stored in solid, insoluble form in complete safety and without threatening the environment.
Jeg beflitter mig på som ordfører at slå en beskeden tone an, men det er alligevel en slags nødskrig, vi må udstøde her som .
Would that the same precautions were taken and the same guarantees were given in respect of all conventional forms of waste, as Mrs Walz has rightly reminded us.
Enhver europæisk småstat nørkler for sig: Storbritannien producerer olie — en præferencestilling hertil har dets partnerlande ikke; Storbritannien og Forbundsrepublikken samt i ringere målestok Frankrig og Belgien producerer kul, investerer milliarder; af de 241 mio tons, der for øjeblikket produceres i Fællesskabet, producerer Stor britannien alene 121 mio tons, altså mere end halv delen.
But according to the report, and specificaly paragraph 14 of the motion for a resolution, and I again quote : '... already demonstrate that the problem can be solved within the requisite period.'.
Sådan kan det ikke fortsætte på dette område, hvis vi ikke nationaløkonomisk, energiøkonomisk set skal sakke bagud i forhold til de store industrilande og handelspartnere, Japan og USA.
Assuming that this quota tion reflects the truth, the conclusion to be drawn is that the condition laid down by the Committee on Energy and Research itself has not, for the moment at least, been satisfied.
Den foreliggende betænkning af fru Walz indeholder klare udsagn herom.
Mrs Ewing (DEP). — Mr President, there is no doubt that the nuclear energy industry is one of the most safety-conscious in the world, and I have a nuclear energy plant in the faraway part of the North of Scotland.
Dette samme gælder det foreliggende forslag til beslutning, hvis målsætning Kommissionen i vidt omfang er enig i.
But there is also no doubt that there is real public concern, and there is no point in scoffing at the fears of what now looks like being a majority of public opinion.
Især på forskningsområdet håber Kommissionen at kunne leve op til de forventninger, der er udtalt i forslaget til beslutning. Den vil imidlertid også inddrage de øvrige mål, der er nævnt, i sit fortsatte arbejde.
The fears are real ; they are based on realities such as the recent pollution in the Irish Sea, the readings on beaches in the North-West of England and recent concerns about health in the area of Windscale in the North of England.
Formanden. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
I would like to make three points.
Afstemningen finder sted i næste afstemningstid.
The first is that there has been quite a lot of talk about the use of thinly populated areas.
Alene i Forbundsrepublikken — den medlemsstat jeg kender bedst — er antallet af miner i de sidste ti år halveret fra 73 til 36.
In short, the resolution demonstrates what we consider to be unjustified optimism for the time being.
Dagsproduktionen for et sådant bjergværk ligger i dag i gennemsnit på 10 000 tons sammenligent med 3 000 tons for ti eller femten år siden.
Paragraph D of the preamble, for example, says that at each of the stages of which the complex disposal process consists different technical solutions exist.
321 400 minearbejdere var i 1983 beskæftiget nede i Fællesskabets miner. Aret før var der 10 000 flere.
The same is true of the simplification of the subsequent stages as a result of the post ponement of earlier stages of waste disposal, as paragraph 11 says.
Det viser blot, hvorledes det tekniske fremskridt her kræver sine ofre.
Mrs Walz is also optimistic when it comes to figures.
Derfor er vi Kommissionen taknemlig for dette initiativ, der søger at medvirke til modernisering af bestående anlæg med finansielle midler fra Fællesskabet og at åbne nye anlæg i rentabel form. Men faren ligger i at udskyde sagen, for dette forslag er i nød, i hvert fald for så vidt angår de første ytringer fra de nationale småsta-
In paragraph 3 of the explanatory statement she says that 0.44 m3of treated highly radioactive waste occurs per thousand million kWh of generated electricity.
•Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
Debates of the European Parliament
Min betænknings indhold er dermed karakteriseret.
Mr Petronio (NI). — (IT) Madame President, in his speech earlier Mr Pintat gave us an extremely inter esting, very practical piece of information.
En række enkeltområder — kulforskning, kulforædling, fremme af fjernvarme med tilskud og lån fra Den europæiske Investeringsbank, generelt incitament til og udbygning af varmemarkedet, især også i den offentlige sektor — og den konstatering, at miljøkrav på dette område afgjort kan opfyldes og ikke er nogen modsætning — at de tværtimod skaber arbejdspladser — alt dette er anført i detaljer i min betænkning.
He told us that by processing — which is one of the two procedures in question — 97% of the fuel elements can be recovered, thus reducing to only 3% the quantity of waste for final disposal by burying.
Jeg mener, at vi i betragtning af de foreliggende 30 ændringsforslag og i betragtning af det vigtige spørgsmål — der skulle forene alle politiske kræfter i Parlamentet, for at der overhovedet er en chance for at sætte det igennem i Ministerrådet — bør kikke på sagen endnu en gang i detaljer.
This is a path that we, of the Italian Political Right, consider should be pursued, and absolutely not abandoned, not only for economic considerations — reasons of cost — even if this aspect is undoubtedly important, seeing that the recovery of such a high percentage of fissile material subsequently reduces other costs in the production process.
Derfor vil jeg ved afslutningen af denne forhandling komme med et forslag om proceduren.
And, of course, there is also the fact that the disposal of only 3%, instead of 100%, is a very much less difficult problem, or at least one that can be more readily got to grips with.
En anden bemærkning, jeg vil fremsætte, er, at de i kulpolitikken også må tages hensyn til visse regionale krav, visse konsekvenser for regionerne ved en bestemt politik.
Mr President, a great deal of attention has been paid to the advantages and disadvantages of reprocessing as against immediate final storage.
De kriterier for støtte, som er fast lagt, tager imidlertid for lidt hensyn hertil.
The preliminary conclusion drawn is that reprocessing is principally a possibility in the case of used fuel elements removed from large reactors.
Kulindustriens fuldstændige undergang vil f.eks betyde, at arbejdsløsheden i en region som Limburg vil stige fra de nuværende 25 %, som alle rede er meget, til 35 %.
These objections are evidently so serious that reprocessing has been banned in the United States since 1977.
Dette er socialt uacceptabelt, i hvert fald hvis en sådan region foreløbig ikke kan regne med en tilpasset omstillingspolitik.
Could the rapporteur or the Commission tell us why this ban has been imposed in America ?
Derfor vil jeg støtte de forslag, hvor der opereres med kriterier, så ikke kun den underjordiske produktivitet, men også den samlede kostpris pr. ton tages i betragtning, og hvor de samlede driftsomkostninger både under og over jorden kan komme til udtryk.
And why is it that we in Europe dare to take risks which have long been considered unacceptable in the United States ?
Kommissionen bør også undersøge, om produktionen ikke gennem forbedring af produktionen og passende investeringer f.eks. i nye kulfyrede kraftværker kan gøres nogenlunde rentabel.
Mr President, to conclude, I regard this report, despite its many qualities, as so excessively optimistic that we shall not be able to give it our approval unless our amendments are adopted.
Lad os imidlertid også tage hensyn til regional udarbejdelse af mulige foranstaltninger, de vigtige følger som de kan få for visse regioner, og også til Fællesskabets globale energistrategi, som desværre — og det sagde hr. Rogalla også — ligeledes mangler i dette forslag til forordning.
I recently read the report of an interview with the scientist Hans Bethe, winner of the Nobel Prize for Physics, during the course of which he stated, with regard to low-level radioactive waste — that is, waste that does not emit alpha rays — that the quantity so far accumulated is around 8 000 tons, which will obviously increase as time goes on.
Tallene viser, at kostprisen for europæisk stenkul er fire til fem gange højere end for stenkul uden for Europa.
The problem, therefore, is one that requires very careful attention.
Kommissionen forudsiger, at indførslens nuværende andel af det samlede forbrug i år 2000 vil være tre gange så stor som nu. Det er derfor tvingende nødvendigt at påbegynde en modernisering og tilpasning af produktionsapparatet.
There can be no hoping to get rid of it by burying it under water — by putting into water the 8 000 tons we have today, and then the 10, or 12, or 20 000 and more that we shall have tomorrow.
Rogallabetænkningen og også Kommissionens undersøgelser viser, at omkring en fjerdedel af Fælles skabets produktion er sikkert rentabel, at 60-65 % er på grænsen af det rentable, og at 15 % giver stort underskud.
The problem must be tackled in all its gravity, with the utmost sense of responsibility, and taking account of the fact that this research — whether geological or of whatever kind — will represent a further cost factor to be charged to the cost of a kilowatthour of electrical energy.
Det er klart, at man ligesom ved stålindustrien og andre traditionelle industrigrene ikke må være blind for en vis økonomisk realitet.
But everything has to be paid for, you don't get anything for nothing.
Det er i dette perspektiv, at økonomi- og valutaudvalget i sin betænkning bemærker, at den europæiske kulindustri vil komme til at stå over for vanskelige beslutninger i de kommende år.
This research sector, moreover, is one that is employing and will employ laboratories, joint centres, young scientists — a whole intellectual and technical world — as well as tens of thousands of workers throughout our common market and over the whole of Europe.
Adam (S). — (EN) fru formand, Rogalla-betænkningen beskriver meget klart Fællesskabets manglende evne til at omsætte faste erklæringer om en øget anvedelse af fast brændsel i industrien til praksis.
Mr Howell (ED). — Madam President, I am very grateful indeed that I have the opportunity, albeit a very modest one, to register my own opinion as a Member who represents another coastal area of the United Kingdom.
Den nuværende situation inden for kulindustrien er yderst alvorlig.
You will realize that I am extremely concerned at what I consider the irresponsibility of many Member States in the present disposal of nuclear waste at sea.
Medmindre de nuværende politik ændres, står kulindustrien over for fortsat nedgang og endelig undergang.
I therefore fully support the document which we are debating today, recognizing that nuclear power has a very important part to play in our society and in each and every one of our lives and can be used very much for the good of every one of us.
Jeg mener, at nogle af aspekterne i økonomi- og valutaudvalgets betænkning er alt for optimistiske på lang sigt.
But it also carries great dangers with it, and those dangers are very often underestimated, underresearched, inadequately understood and that I believe is an extremely dangerous position.
Dog er det ikke alt, der er så dystert i denne industri gren. En undersøgelse foretaget af »World CoaU, som også bliver bekræftet af Det internationale Energi agentur, viser, at kullenes andel i OECD-landenes samlede energiforbrug i år 2000 vil kunne stige til omkring 30 % i forhold til de omkring 18 % nu.
I would therefore support the complete abandonment of disposal of all nuclear waste at sea, be it at a high level, a low level, a medium level or any other level, because of the great difficulty in determining its impact on our food chains and within our oceans.
Vi ser udviklingen i oliepriserne, vi ser også kostprisen
I understand Mrs Ewing's problem but I would ask her to allow us to put nuclear waste in convenient sites on
De ligger 10 % over sidste års niveau: 50 mio tons oplagres af
Inevitably what we do causes effects that, subsequently, in prac-
Adam miske opsving — at problemet om opsving i beskæftigelsen og økonomien i Europa en starlet afhængigt af investeringer i energisektoren.
The technical and economic parameters are presented succinctly and clearly and the views discussed which led to this motion for a resolution.
Importen til Fællesskabet stiger også.
tice, we learn to correct.
Den er steget med 50 % siden 1973 og ligger nu på 70 mio tons om året.
The difficulties inherent in a system become evident as you go along.
Kulhandelen er overgivet til vore konkurrenter. Ja, nogle siden af de infrastrukturordninger, der er foreslået i Kommissionens dokument for at øge brugen af kul, vil i virkeligheden øge importen.
And so we would suggest reasoned optimism and a Community commitment on these lines, and for these reasons we shall support Mrs Walz's resolution, which seems to us admirably balanced, and which calls for a Community directive for this sector through which it will also be possible to take advantage of the assistance and aid of special bodies such as the Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna.
Den eneste nuværende politik går ud på at lukke miner.
Here as in all fields, the concept of Community solidarity is of major importance to the Commission.
Den socialistiske gruppe kræver en ny strategi, der er baseret på en fast forpligtelse til ikke at forøge importandelen.
And solidarity means that those problems which cannot be solved, or not solved adequately, at the national level, should be transferred to the Community.
Rinsche (PPE). — (DE) Fru formand, mine damer og herrer, hr. Rogallas betænkning beskæftiger sig med Kommissionens forslag om finansiel støtte til de industrier, der producerer fast brændsel.
Mr Turner (ED). — Madam President, I wish to support the Walz report and raise two specific points with Mr Narjes, the Commissioner.
Grundtanken bag denne overvejelse er hjælp til selvhjælp.
First, I welcome the provision for a double check on the safety of nuclear waste disposal through the EEC in conjunction with the national authorities.
De industrier i Fællesskabet, der producerer fast brændsel, står over for forandringens, vækstens, rentabilitetens og konkurrencedygtighedens store problemer og krav.
But can I take it that this proposal will include provisions not only for the intermediate and final disposal of nuclear waste, but also for its safe transport from the sites where it is produced to where it is disposed of and also safe storage in interim storage tanks at the site of the nuclear power station ?
Disse store udfordringer kan ikke klares af disse industrier ved egen kraft.
This is covered by paragraph 10 of the resolution.
60 % af den nuværende produktion, der kun marginalt set er urentabel, kan dermed gøres konkurrencedygtig.
However, national prejudices all too frequently prevent this happening and I hope this will not always be so.
Gruppen ønsker mere fleksible kriterier for investeringsstøtte.
This is not least the case in the field of nuclear waste disposal.
Efter vore overvejelser og efter vor overbevisning er indsatsen af finansielle midler her fra Fællesskabet nødvendig, berettiget og lovende; dog må vi erkende og aner kende grænserne for vore finansielle muligheder.
A further central point in the report is an assessment of the two possible methods of disposal, direct final storage of spent fuel elements or the reprocessing of fuel elements, followed by final storage of the residual waste.
De finansielle midler må ikke opfattes som et bundløst kar. Omkostningsberegningernes lille tabel gælder også for produktionen af fast brændsel og kan ikke sættes ud af kraft af en nok så velment beslutning.
The rapporteur wishes to keep both options open, but takes the view that reprocessing is likely to be the most suitable method for dealing with the large quantities of fuel elements from power reactors.
Der er en betydelig mulighed for udvikling af nye miner, der ville være fuldt konkurrencedygtige med importeret kul til de nuvarende priser. Der er ikke nogen tekniske grunde til, at produktionen ikke skulle kunne øges med mindst 120 mio tons om året, hvis viljen til at investere er til stede.
In October 1983 Parliament, in the Linkohr report on the research programme at Ispra on nuclear power, called for the speeding up of the completion of the data bank at Ispra which would include full details of all components in pressurized water reactors and all incidents concerning any of the components, so that every pressurized water reactor in future could be run with a knowledge of all previous incidents involving all other pressurized water reactors.
Denne investering ville også åbne mulighed for en overgangsperiode og beskyttelse af miner, der trues med lukning. De sociale konsekvenser må tages i betragtning såvel som konsekvenserne for den regionale økonomi.
We call for the speeding up of this data bank and for the systematic analysis of the information to be contained in it.
Det andet påkrævede .hovedelement er at sikre markeder for de kul, der produceres. Vi har brug for investeringer til fordel for kul for at fjerne elektricitetsproduktion ved hjælp af olie og gas.
The Commission is aware that doubts are being cast on the cost-effectiveness of reprocessing, but this in no way means that the development of this complicated technology should be halted.
Fireogtyve procent af elektriciteten produceres stadig ved hjælp af olie og gas.
This is particularly true of the conditioning and disposal of radioactive waste from reprocessing.
Endnu en bemærkning om fremme af forbruget af fast brændsel.
Here there is room for further research and improvement.
Således er f.eks. salget af kokskul i sidste tredjedel af 1983 steget med 25 % sammenholdt med året forud.
Nevertheless, in the long term this form of nuclear waste disposal is obviously technically feasible and also relative non-polluting.
Salget af kraftværkskul steg fra 36,4 mio tons i 1982 til 39,6 mio ton i 1983.
A number of recent studies corroborate this.
Ved drøftelsen om ændringsforslagene dertel er der imidlertid efter min opfattelse opstået nogle problemer, eftersom ikke alle krav bringes på en fælles nævner.
As far as the direct final storage of spent fuel elements is concerned, it is not possible with our present level of knowledge to draw the same conclusions.
Vi har brug for en rationel og virkelighedsorienteret energi politik. En sådan politik uden ideologier og uden illusioner tjener alle borgere i Fællesskabet.
We are therefore planning in the third Community research programme into radioactive waste which is to be submitted shortly, to pay due attention to this problem.
Det skal noteres, at Rådet ynkeligt forpassede at tage den udfordring op.
We read, therefore, Mrs Walz's report with great
Endelig vil jeg gerne understrege — og det støttes af Albert og Ball rapporten om det europæiske økono
Before I come to my third topic, I would like to reply to a question by Mr Eisma, namely why reprocessing was discontinued in the United States in 1977.
Nogle af
I do
Moreland punkterne i det beslutningsforslag, som vi beskæftiger os med, kom fra ændringsforslag fra hr. Sassano.
Mrs Walz's report makes this clear. It encourages us and will have a considerable influence on our future work in the field of disposal.
Jeg ved, at min gruppe og sikkert andre medlemmer af energiudvalget gerne vil bede Dem sige til hans familie, at vi føler hans død som et stort tab — ikke alene for Parlamentet, men især for energiudvalget.
Particularly as far as research is concerned the Commission is hopeful that it will be able to satisfy the expectations in the resolution and it will take account in its work of the various other objectives. tives.
Jeg vil også gerne minde Parlamentet om, at i 1975 forpligtede Rådet sig over for kullene, og det bekræftede dette i Venezia-erklæringen for et par år siden.
not wish to pre-empt a thorough discussion in committee, but I would just like to point out that in the United States reprocessing is carried out by private industry and that as far as we can tell, it could not operate profitably.
Hvis vi skal have en levedygtig kulindustri, er det ikke alene Parlamentets, Kommissionens eller Rådets ansvar; det er også ledelsens og fagforeningernes ansvar.
Non-proliferation considerations may have played a part, but I believe we should leave more detailed discussions to the appropriate committee.
Fru formand, jeg mener, at når man beskæftiger sig med emnet kul, må man være realistisk.
President. — The next item is the report (Doc.
Det vil formodentlig fortsat være tilfældet i lang tid fremover.
I now come to the third aspect of the report, Community research.
For det andet har vi et stort antal miner i alle de fire medlemslande, der er producenter, som er urentable.
In recent years, Community research has increasingly become a vehicle for integration.
For det tredje har vi meget store lagre for øjeblikket, og hvis folk klager over smørbjerget, burde de også klage over kulbjerget i Fællesskabet.
The more national research projects are coordinated via Community research, and the more transfrontier cooperation on research is developed, the more likely it is that common solutions will be found and legislation developed at Community level.
Endelig har vi selvfølgelig den stigende vanskelighed og det stigende pres, der stammer fra klager over virkningerne på miljøet, især den sure nedbør.
Community research not only encourages political and legal integration, it is also essential if we are to master a difficult technology, which we must, if only for the sake of the environment and health.
Det betyder, at problemet er reelt og hele tiden banker på Parlamentets dør.
the proposal from the Commission of the European Communities to the Council (Doc.
Også vi italienske kommunister erkender dets betydning på den europæiske energiarena. Vi har derfor aldrig i den forbindelse afvist en konfrontation med de øvrige politiske partier.
1-647/83 — COM(83) 447 final) for a regulation concerning financial support of the Community in favour of industries producing solid fuels and on the proposals for a balanced solid fuels policy (COM(83) 309 final).
På den anden side mener jeg, det er vigtigt at erindre sig, at skønt kul fra lande uden for Fællesskabet er billige, er der usikkerhed.
Mr Rogalla (S), rapporteur. — (DE) Madam President, ladies and gentlemen !
Vi har tidligere oplevet tilfælde, hvor vanskeligheder i Australien — strejker, manglende transportinfrastruktur — rent faktisk begrænsede tilgangen af kul til Fællesskabet.
This directly elected Parliament last considered the question of coal two years ago, in relation to the motions for resolutions submitted by Mr Moreland and Mr Rinsche on energy strategy and energy policy.
Generelt er det vigtigt for os at bevare en kulindustri i Fælles skabet, i hvert fald af hensyn til forsyningssikkerheden. heden.
The rapporteurs in question represented different political viewpoints in this House even on the minor issues such as coking coal and lower Community subsidies.
Jeg støtter Kommissionens forslag, der er til behandling.
Nevertheless, I, as the rapporteur today, feel very uneasy.
Alligevel forekommer det os, at Kommissionen kun har gjort begrænsede fremskridt med hensyn til at stille forslag.
But now there is a difference : for the first time concrete financial proposals have been made which relate to more than coking coal.
Det er bestemt ikke let at finde frem til en tilfredsstillende løsning for alle Fællesskabets lande: de nationale objektive betingelser er for forskellige.
Community funds are to be made available to support coal as a source of energy, to subsidize economically viable mines and to encourage new, rational methods of coal-mining.