natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En ting må egentlig indlysende for en hver, der tænker en smule logisk: alle vore hidtidige tal er indrettet efter 434 eller endog kun 410 parlamentsmedlemmer.
One point, at any rate, must be clear to anyone who has the slightest ability to think logically: all the numbers concerned have been based on a membership of 434 or even of 410.
Vi benyttede ikke udvidelsen med Grækenland til at ændre noget derved, men sagde: vi venter, til den store udvidelse kommer.
No change was made after Greece's arrival; instead, we decided that we would wait until the big enlargement came.
Nu har vi et Parlament med 518 medlemmer, og som følge deraf skal der for bestemte ting. som optager hele Parlamentet, fastsættes nye minimumstal. Disse minimumstal har jo bestået deres prøve.
Now we have a Parliament of 518 Members, with the result that for certain matters of concern to the Parliament as a whole new minimum numbers must be fixed.
Jeg synes, at hr. Wedekind i sin betænkning absolut er gået den rigtige vej ved at sige, at det fornuftigste ville være at forhøje alle disse minimumstal forholds mæssigt.
It would be difficult for us to understand this since we have become accustomed to finding the European Parliament in the front line of defence of the interests of Portugal and Spain as regards membership.
På én undtagelse nær vil også min gruppe følge ham ad denne vej : denne ene undtagelse er det tal, som i den gamle forretningsorden altid var 21 og nu i den nye forretningsorden efter hr. Wedekinds forslag eller udvalgets skal være 27.
And we would find it hard to understand, finally, if this motion were to be rejected, when the number of vice-presidents are changed precisely to take the new Member States into account at the time of the first and second enlarge ments.
Wedekind (PPE), ordfører. — (DE) Hr. formand, vi har foretaget alle nødvendige ændringer, således at forøgelsen af antallet af medlemmer med 25% kom mer til udtryk i minimumstal o.lign i forretningsor denen. Det er det hele.
And it is this same statutory equality that we claim, here today; but we claim it in order that our difference may through the Bureau enrich the ideal of the European Parliament.
Oprindelig foreslog jeg en anden fremgangsmåde.
President. — The debate is closed.
Arndt vanskeligheder.
Arndt minimum numbers be adapted to the total membership of Parliament.
Derfor stiller vi et ændringsforslag om. at tallet 27 overalt, hvor det forekommer, erstattes med tallet 23.
Mr Wedekind was quite right in his report in arguing that the most sensible thing would be to raise all these minimum numbers proportionately.
Vi accepterer helt og fuldt hr. Wcdckinds motiver, men med henblik på senere at opnå. at mere end 260 medlemmer stemmer for, har vi erklæret os indforstået med dette kompromis og vil stemme for Wedekind-betænkningen i denne form.
With one exception, my group will also take this course. This one exception is the number that was always fixed in the old Rules of Procedure at 21 and now, in the Rules of Procedure, according to the proposal of Mr Wedekind and his committee, should be fixed at 27.
Jeg vil gerne endnu en gang gøre opmærksom på. at vi ikke vil gøre det for nemt for os selv. og at vi naturligvis vil tage hensyn til mindretallenes og de små gruppers rettigheder.
If we were a Parliament in which individual Members could effectively voice their views on weighty matters, could represent their electorates in a fitting manner, could carry out their mandates to the hilt, then I would not be shocked by the proposals put forward by Mr Wedekind.
Men af lutter hensyntagen til selv det sidste medlems rettigheder må vi under ingen omstændigheder forsomme Europa-Parlamentets arbejdsevne, og vi ved jo, at Europa-Parlamentet på grund af sine særegenheder er nået til grænsen for sin arbejdsevne.
However, all our colleagues, especially those from the larger groups, complain — though not in the House or in the committees but in the corridors — about the difficulty of making their voices heard in this Parliament. They deplore the overweening power given in this Parliament to the political groups.
Derfor vil vi med den eneste ændring, at vi reducerer minimumstallet fra 27 til 23 medlemmer, stemme for Wedckindbetænkningen.
We therefore have an amendment to replace the number 27, every time it occurs, by the number 23.
Cicciomessere (NI). — (IT) Hr. formand, kæere kol leger, jeg tror. at kun la af de medlemmer, der er til stede, er klar over, hvor ømfindtlig det emne er, vi behandler.
I wish to say once more that we do not want to make things too easy for ourselves and are certainly anxious to recognize the rights of minorities and of the smaller groups.
Lad mig præcisere, at jeg her ikke ønsker at tale som medlem uden for grupperne og til forsvar for deres formentlige interesser, men som medlem af Parlamentet.
Recognizing the rights of all down to the last Member should not, however, in any circumstances prompt us to neglect the ability of this Parliament to get things done, and we are already aware that because of its pecularities this Parliament has stretched its ability to the limit.
Og hvad sker der så med hr. Wedekinds forslag?
Well then, what is the Wedekind proposal going to do?
De få rettigheder, de få muligheder for at udtrykke sig rent politisk, de enkelte medlemmer har, begrænses, ja de afskaffes.
The few powers that individual Members enjoy and the few opportunities they are given to express their political views will be curtailed, if not indeed done away with altogether.
Jet tænker her på de to klassiske instrumenter, de enkelte medlemmer har til deres rådighed i Parlamentet : mundtlige forespørgsler og uopsættelige forhandlinger, som netop er de instrumenter, der til lader medlemmerne at komme til orde.
I would point to the two classic working instruments of the individual Member in this House — the oral questions and the motions for urgent debate, by which he can succeed in making his views known.
At gøre det endnu vanskeligere for det enkelte medlem, idet der kræves et større antal underskrifter, er en objektivt set alvorlig ting, idet man griber afgørende ind i det enkelte medlems rettigheder.
Making the Member's task even more difficult by requiring a larger number of signatures is, in any objective way of looking at it, a very serious matter in that it strikes at the very heart of the rights enjoyed by individual Members.
De enkelte parlaments medlemmers mulighed for at komme til orde, de problemer Parlamentet er stillet overfor, vanskelighederne ved at udforme en politik — og her tænker jeg på Europa-Parlamentets egen politik — afhænger ikke, som nogle mener, af medlemmernes overdrevne rettigheder, men i stedet af noget helt andet, nemlig af regeringernes manglende evne til at realisere den europæiske union.
Whatever about the expression of political views by individual Members, the problems faced by this Assembly and its difficulty in articulating a policy, that is to say, a European Parliament policy, do not stem — as some might think, Mr President — from the excessive power of the Members but from something else entirely, namely, the inability of the governments to bring about European Union.
Hvorfor ønsker man så at gå den ne farlige ved. denne vej der fører til annullering af de enkeltes rettigheder og beføjelser.
I feel bound to explain, Mr President, that I do not intend to speak at this point as a member of the non-attached group on the basis of their supposed interests but as a Member of this Assembly.
Jeg mener på grundlag af disse overvejelser, som jeg håber vil blive støttet afalle kolleger, at det ville være ubelejligt at vedtage de tekster, vi behandler.
In the light of all these arguments, which will, I hope, be honestly weighed up by all our colleagues, I feel that it would not be advisable to adopt the documents we are considering.
Derfor vil jeg i overensstemmelse med artikel 85 i forretningsordenen anmode om, at den anden Wedekindbetænkning henvises til fornyet udvalgsbehandling for at åbne mulighed for, at de spanske og portugisi ske medlemmmer kan deltage i en grundig drøftelse i udvalget, hvillat vil være naturligt.
At this point therefore, Mr President, I am making a formal request to you, pursuant to Rule 85, to have the second Wedekind report sent back to committee, in order to enable all the Spanish and Portuguese Members to take part in a detailed discussion of the matter within the committee itself, as is only natural.
Også hvad det første spørgsmål angår, hr. formand, vil jeg anmode Dem om ikke at sætte forslaget under afstemning, men henvise det til fornyet udvalgsbehandling i hen hold til artikel 85.
With regard to the first proposal by Mr Wedekind, I would also ask you, Mr President, not to put that to the vote but to send it back to committee under Rule 85.
Formanden. — Hr. Cicciomessere har i overensstemmelse med artikel 85 i forretningsordenen anmodet om, at betænkningen henvises til fornyet udvalgsbehandling. handling.
President. — Mr Cicciomessere has asked, under Rule 85, for this report to be sent back to committee.
Jeg mener, at der især bør skabes klarhed om ét punkt, hr. for mand: nemlig det formanden for den socialistiske gruppe med rette henviste til. og som hr. Wedekind ikke nævnte.
I feel that first of all we should be clear in our minds on one point which was referred to by the chairman of the Socialist Group but not by Mr Wedekind.
Denne ændring af forretningsordenen efter de spanske og portugisiske kollegerss tiltrædelse er faktisk ikke påkrævet i medfør af traktaten.
This amendment to the Rules of Procedure is not necessary at all under the Treaty as a result of the arrival of our Spanish and Portuguese colleagues.
Sagen er uddebatteret, og nu bør vi stemme om den — jeg vil i den forbindelse gerne endnu en gang gøre det klart, at der slet ikke finder nogen ændring af forretningsordenen sted, men kun en tilpasning til de nye
Whereas the first amendment concerning the enlargement of the Bureau, which we were debating just now, may be related to the accession of Spain and Portugal, even
Derved er der ingen, der fratages nogen form for rettigheder, alt bliver ved det gamle.
I wish to make it clear once more that there are to be no changes in the Rules of Procedure, only an adaptation to the new membership figures: nobody is to be deprived of any rights whatever, everything is to stay as it was.
(Anmodningen om tilbagevisning til udvalget blev ikke imødekommet)
(Parliament rejected the request for reference to com mittee)
Afstemningen finder sted på onsdag kl. 18.
The vote will take place on Wednesday at 6 p.m.
EKSF-afgiftssatsen (afstemning)
ECSC levy rate (vote)
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er be tænkning (dok.
President. — The next item is the vote on the report by Mr Bardong, on behalf of the Committee on Budgets (Doc.
A 2-177/85) af Bardong for budgetudvalget over
A 2-177/85), on
I stedet vil jeg gå ind på de konklusioner, udvalget er nået frem til, konklusioner, der i øvrigt er i overensstemmelse med det, der blev anført i Revisionsrettens særberetning, som jeg før henviste til.
I should like to remind Members that the regulation on sheep meat has one main aim, which is to help to eliminate the deep-seated differences which existed, and indeed still exist, between the two principal countries that produce and market sheepmeat, the United Kingdom and France, and, by so doing, to establish a common market along the lines envisaged in the Treaty.
C2-83/85) vedrørende fastsættelsen af EKSF-afgiftssatsen og opstillingen af EKSFs aktionsbudget for 1986.
C 2-83/85) on the fixing of the ECSC levy rate and on the drawing up of the ECSC operating budget for 1986.
Bardong (PPE), ordforer. — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg anmoder om, at denne betænkning tilbagevises til udvalget.
Mr Bardong (PPE), rapporteur. — (DE) Mr President, I ask for this report to be sent back to com mittee.
Betænkningen er i sin nuværende form for ældet, for Kommissionen traf allerede i slutningen af sidste år beslutning om afgiftssatsen.
In its present form, it is out of date, since the Commission decided on the levy rate at the end of last year.
Det kan den også gøre i EKSF-spørgsmål, for dér er den ikke for pligtet til at indhente Parlamentets udtalelse — selv om jeg har det indtryk, at den ville have taget vor udtalelse meget alvorligt, selv om den ikke havde svaret til Kommissionens egne ønsker.
This it can do in connection with the ECSC, since it is not obliged to seek the opinion of Parliament — although I have the impression that it would have taken our opinion very seriously, even if it had not corresponded to the Commission's own wishes.
Parlamentet har i hvert fald ikke stemt om det i tide, og derfor beder jeg om, at betænkningen tilbagevises til det relevante udvalg.
In any case, Parliament has failed to vote on the matter in good time, hence my request that the report be sent back to the appropriate committee.
(Tilbagevisning til udvalget vedtoges)
(Parliament decided to send the report back to com mittee)
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er be tænkning (dok A2-157/85) af Barbarella for budget kontroludvalget om de budgetkontrolmæssige aspekter ved den fælles markedsordning for fårekød (på grundlag af Revisionsrettens særberetning af 4.9.1984, EFT nr. C 234 af 4.9.1984).
President. — The next item is the report by Mrs Bar barella, on behalf of the Committee on Budgetary Control, on the budgetary control aspects of the com mon organization of the market in sheepmeat (following upon the special report of the Court of Auditors of 4 September 1984, OJ C 234) (Doc. A 2-157/85).
Budgetkontroludvalget er nu nået til den opfattelse, at hvis ellers prisforskellene og dermed også produktionsforholdene fortsætter, og hvis den nuværende importmekanisme bibeholdes, kan det ske, at produktionen stiger ukontrolleret med en omkostningsstigning til følge.
The first conclusion reached by our committee was that Regulation 1837 of 1980 on sheepmeat has not, as of the present moment, eliminated all the differences between the various regions that produce sheepmeat, either in the matter of prices for the product or, obviously, in the matter of bringing about the same conditions of production in these areas.
Revisionsrettens iagttagelser vakte bekymring, for så vidt angik den effektive anvendelse af de finansielle midler på dette område. Det førte så til, at budget kontroludvalget tog initiativ til en betænkning om fårekød.
We were forced to conclude that, from this point of view, the sheepmeat regulation has not succeeded in achieving the objective of harmonizing the market in this sector.
Udvalget stillede sig det spørgsmål, hvilket udbytte man havde fået af fællesskabsinterventionen i forhold til de omkostninger, den havde medført.
Not only that, however; these differences have, we believe, resulted in considerable financial costs, which, moreover, have been rising over the years.
Det er med andre ord fire år efter ikrafttrædelsen af den fælles markedsordning muligt at foretage en
In 1981, the first year of operation of this common organization of the market, the figure for expenditure was approximately 191m units of account.
Sammenfattende: budgetkontroludvalget har villet indtage et neutralt standpunkt, for så vidt de meka-
In 1984 it had risen to 433 and in 1985 to 461, though this latter figure is naturally an estimate and not yet final.
Lad os så se på de urimelige bestemmelser. For det første giver præmien til moderfår, der gives på ensartet måde uden hensyn til antallet af får pr. bedrift, en urimelig fordel til de store brug.
If the differences in prices and hence also in produc­tion conditions are to continue to obtain and if the present import arrangements continue to operate, the Committee on Budgetary Control feels that they could lead to an uncontrolled increase in production, with a resulting increase in costs.
nismer angår, det vil blive nødvendigt at ændre.
Regulation Nr. 1837/80 on the common organization of the market in sheepmeat will assume in future.
Det vil jeg gerne hr. formand, i forbindelse med de talrige ændringsforslag, der er blevet stillet af nogle politiske grupper og af landbrugsudvalget.
This regulation provides another illustration of the rule that an inefficient system results in a waste of resources.
Jeg mener, at jeg som ordfører for budgetkontroludvalget bør fraråde forsamlingen at vedtage disse ændringsforslag.
Mrs Barbarella's report on behalf of the Committee on Budgetary Control considers only the waste of resources.
Der er her i de fleste tilfælde — det gælder ikke alle, men en stor del — tale om ændringsforslag, der vedrører den måde. hvorpå mekanismen i den fælles markedsordning fungerer.
In the interests of social justice and econo­mic efficiency, we must draw attention to the causes' of that waste: the unfairness and malfunctioning of the organization of the market.
Den variable slagtepræmie, der kun udbetales i Stor britannien, er årsag til, at sidstnævnte medlemsstat har fået 93% af EUGFL — garantifondens bevillinger til fårekødmarkedet i 1983 og yderligere 75% i 1984/1985 for kun 40% af fællesskabsproduktionen.
— and I stress that, financial management — of this common organization of the market, some changes to the regulation itself are called for.
Denne præmies eksistens har en så generel virkning, at den breder sig sie de andre kødsorters priser, der i modsætning til fårekødet ikke drager fordel af nogen præmie.
It urges the Com­mission and the Council therefore to search out more appropriate solutions, even though it appreciates the difficulties that a review of this common organization of the market will give rise to.
I et af mine ændringsforslag betragter jeg derfor indførelse af clawback som bydende nødvendig.
None of the aims of the regulation has been achieved.
I så henseende er den nylig indførte nye forordning et betydningsfuldt fremskridt, idet den udtrykkeligt ude lukker moderfar fra præmieordningen — hvilket er logisk nok, idet markedet hovedsagelig er et fårekødsmarked — samtidig med at den indfører 50% clawback ved udførsel.
The disparities between production structures and the prices on the principal markets have not been reduced. Yet these are essential prerequisites for the implemen­tation of an acceptable common organization of the market.
Afslutningsvis vil jeg gerne gentage, at budgetkontrol udvalget i lyset af den analyse, det har foretaget af konsekvenserne af den finansielle forvaltning af den ne sektor, er af den opfattelse, at der er behov for visse ændringer af forordningen, selv om det som sagt har valgt at indtage en neutral holdning og undgå at gå ind i en polemik, der givetvis ville være meget bitter, og især har det valgt at respektere sine konkrete beføjelser.
I should like to add, with all the emphasis at my com­mand, that the Committee on Budgetary Control was at great pains to avoid going into any details with regard to what these changes should contain, even though it certainly hopes they will be made. It took this line because it felt that, given its specific compet­ences, it ought to confine itself to making an assess­ment, as I said already, of the financial management and its consequences.
Også vor udenrigssamhandel bidrager til forstyrrelse af den fælles markedsordning. Fællesskabet er kun 75% selvforsynende.
In the amendments I have tabled on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, I mention all the provi­sions of the sheepmeat régime which have the effect of distorting competition.
Altså importeres resten i hen hold til selvbegrænsningsaftaler, der er indgået med tredjelande, blandt hvilke New Zealand er det vigtig ste.
I regret the position taken by the rapporteur and hope that these amendments will be incorporated into her report — which does not imply, I think, that the committees are trespassing on each others' powers.
Til gengæld for en begrænsning af leverancerne nyder dette kød en nedsættelse af værditolden til 10% i stedet for den konsoliderede GATT-tarifs 20%.
Personally, I believe that we are dealing with a single, indivisible issue. Parliament as a whole cannot remain neutral on this subject, it must face up to its responsibilities.
Eyraud (S), ordforer for udtalelsen fra udvalget om landbrug, fiskeri og ernæring. — (FR) Hr. formand, efter at have rettet en velkomsthilsen til vore spanske og portugisiske kolleger vil jeg gerne henlede deres opmærksomhed på den fremtidige betydning af for ordning nr. 1837/80 om den fælles markedsordning for fårekød.
What it boils down to, Mr President, is that the Com­mittee on Budgetary Control felt that it should take up a neutral position with regard to the mechanisms that will have to be changed. I feel that I should point this out in view of the numerous amendments that have been tabled by some political groups and by the Com­mittee on Agriculture itself.
Denne forordning unddrager sig nemlig heller ikke den regel, hvorefter ineffektivitet medfører spild af ressourcer.
As rapporteur for the Committee on Budgetary Control, I feel that, on the basis of what I have just been saying, I must advise the House against adopting these amendments.
Fru Barbarellas betænkning for budgetkontroludvalget beskæftiger sig udelukkende med spildet.
Firstly, the uniform system of awarding the ewe premium, regardless of the number of ewes per farm, gives an unfair advantage to big farms.
Af hen syn til den sociale retfærdighed og den økonomiske effektivitet skal årsagerne dertil nævnes : markedsordningens urimelighed og funktionsforstyrrelser.
To make matters worse, Directive No. 75/268 on aid for mountain, hill and less­favoured areas also fails to set any ceiling on aid on the basis of the number of ewes on each farm.
I snit ændringsforslag nr. 13 — punkt 6 g til 6 i — understreger jeg, i hvor høj grad denne import virker forstyrrende. Storbritannien, som er New Eealands traditionelle aftager, importerer ganske vist størstedelen deraf, hvilket omvendt sætter dette land i stand il at oversvømme kontinentet med sin hjemmeproduktion på de netop omtalte yderst favorable konkurrencebetingelser. cebetingelser.
— of the amendments which concern the way in which the mechanisms of the common organization of the market operate.
Intet af de i forordningen fastsatte mål et nået.
The existence of this subsidy has wider reper­cussions in that it affects the price of meats which, unlike sheepmeat, do not benefit from it.
For skellen mellem produktionsvilkårene og priserne på de vigtigste markeder er ikke reduceret. Dette er imidlertid en nødvendig forudsætning for gennemførelse af en korrekt virkende fælles markedsordning.
I therefore call as a matter of necessity, in one of my amend­ments, for the application of the claw­back system.
Efter de forbundne kars princip hindrer denne billige import først og fremmest de engelske priser i at blive harmoniseret med de andre medlemsstaters, og der næst smitter deres trykkende virkning af på de andre markeder.
In conclusion, Mr President, I want to make it clear that the Committee on Budgetary Control considers, in the light of its analysis of the consequences of the financial management in this sector, that some changes need to be made to the regulation.
Det medfører større og større støtteudgifter, som det er så meget desto vanskeligere at acceptere, som der er underskud på markedet og vi befinder os i en sparetid.
At the same time it takes, as I said, a neutral stance and — always bearing in mind, above all, its own specific competences — avoids entering into a dispute that we all know could prove to be a very bitter one.
Det er rimeligt at respektere den traditionelle samhandel, men fællesskabspræferencen bør komme i første række. Ikke mindst når markedsordningens funktion i alvorlig grad forstyrres af denne handel.
Mr Eyraud (S), draftsman of the opinion of the Com­mittee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. — (FR) Mr President, after warmly welcoming, like many other Members, our Spanish and Portuguese colleagues, I wish to draw their attention to the importance that
I de af mig for landbrugsudvalget stillede ændringsforslag omtaler jeg alle de bestemmelser i fårekødforordningen, der medfører konkurrenceforvridning.
Our external trade also serves to disrupt the common organization of the market.
For mit vedkommende mener jeg, at der er tale om et udeleligt hele.
The Community is only 75% self­sufficient in sheepmeat.