natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det ulykkelige resultat af overgrebet i Brighton er faren for, at det kan sinke eller standse ethvert af de fremskridt, som man håber kan finde sted i drøftelserne med Det for enede Kongeriges myndigheder som følge af den nylige beslutning i Irish Forum, hvor alle interesserede legitime irske demokratiske grupper endes om en fre delig, kollektiv enhedsholdning til løsningen af problemerne for øen Irland.
The unfortunate outcome of the Brighton outrage is the danger that it may slow down or stop any of the progress that hopefully can be made in discussions with the United Kingdom authorities arising from the recent decisions of the Irish Forum where all legitimate Irish democratic groups interested agreed to a peaceful, collective, unified approach towards the solution of the problems of the island of Ireland.
Schwalba-Hoth område — væbnet kamp, såkaldt terrorisme, vold — sker for handlingens skyld.
They talk as if deeds of this kind — armed conflict, so-called terrorism, violence — were ends in themselves.
Jeg tror, at disse handlinger tværtimod er udtryk for et behov for at gøre opmærksom på noget, også udtryk for manglende selvbestemmelsesret, f.eks. baskerne og nordirerne.
I believe such deeds are the expression of a need to get a message across. For example the denial of the right to self determination of the Basques and the people of Northern Ireland.
(Protester) at oprette en politicentral for samarbejde mellem de forskellige ordensmagter.
I would remind you that the French Government has proposed the setting up in Paris of a central police off ice to facilitate cooperation by the various law enforcement agencies.
Måske er det også her på høje tid at tale om regeringernes ansvar, for i det lange løb må vi dog konstatere, at netop hvor det drejer sig om europæiske problemer, er regeringerne des værre altid hæmskoen.
Here too it is perhaps high time we reminded the governments of their responsibility, for in the long run it must be said that where European problems are concerned it is always the govern ments, unfortunately, which are the stumbling block.
Det er vor opgave til stadig hed at minde dem om det, vi allerede har sagt.
It is our job to keep reminding them of what we have already said.
Penders (PPE). — (NL) Hr. formand, vi lever i en verden, som er bygget op af stater. Systemet er langt fra perfekt, men det fungerer.
Mr Penders (PPE). — Mr President, we live in a world which consists of nation states.
International terrorisme skærer nu tværs gennem denne struktur, og i længden kan det kun føre til anarki, medmindre der bliver sat en stopper for den.
International terrorism is a direct attack on this structure and, unless it is stopped, it is bound in the long run to lead to anarchy.
Det er nødvendigt at gribe særdeles hårdt ind over for terrorismen, fordi den ellers truer med at triumfere på to fronter.
Tough measures must be taken to combat terrorism, or there is a danger that it will triumph on two fronts.
Hos næsten alle talerne kunne man iagttage det sam me, og i samme grad, nemlig at de udifferentieret benyttede udtrykkene vold og terrorisme.
Common to all speakers was the fact that they make no distinction between violence and terrorism.
Deres tilråb har allerede vist, at De vil misforstå det.
And the cries from the floor have shown that this is deliberate.
Vi her i regnbuegruppen og som deltagere i fredsbevægelsen går ind for ikke-voldelige konfliktløsninger, og vi me ner, at når De her taler om vold, om ikke-statslig vold, må De heller ikke lukke øjnene for udtrykkene for statslig vold, for strukturel vold, for de over tusinde argentinere der druknede og blev dræbt af britiske ansvarlige i Falkland- eller Malviner-konflikten.
We as the Rainbow Group and as part of the peace movement are in favour of non-violent solutions to conflicts and, in our view, if your are talking here of violence, of non-government violence, you should not close your eyes to forms of violence which are organized and orchestrated by the state, to the thousand and more Argentinians killed and sunk by the British in the Falklands war.
Så må De heller ikke lukke øjnene, når minearbejdere i England eller andre demonstranter overalt bliver slået ned med knipler.
You should not close your eyes to the miners bludgenoed to their knees in England or demonstrators who are also bludgeoned to their knees everywhere.
Den første front er de ubarmhjertige stater, som benytter terrorisme — hvad enten det sker anonymt eller ej — og den anden front er de svage stater, som ikke effektivt kan eller tør forsvare sig og gøre mod stand mod terrorismen.
Firstly, there are the merciless countries that make use of terrorism — some anonymously, others not — and secondly, there are the weak countries which cannot or dare not effectively defend themselves against ter rorism or oppose it.
Så længe verden består at stater, vil der være konflikter, men kendetegnet på en civiliseret menneskehed er, at stridigheder behandles fredeligt og om muligt løses.
As long as the world continues to consist of nation states, there will be conflicts, but what singles out civilized mankind is that differences are discussed peacefully and, if possible, settled.
Terrorisme gør en sådan form for politik umulig, og derfor er det også en så overordentlig farlig trussel for vor civilisations overlevelsesmuligheder.
Terrorism makes this approach impossible, and that is why it is so serious a threat to the survival of civilization as we know it.
Jeg finder det forløjet, når en politikers liv her vurderes højere end en eller anden fanges.
I think it is wrong here to value the life of a politician more highly than the life of any other prisoner.
Vi har solidarisk medfølelse med alle ofre for statslig eller ikke-statslig terror eller vold her i verden.
We feel for all victims of terror or violence in this world, whether state-sponsored or not.
Når man her skelner mellem en politikers værdifulde liv og en borgers mindreværdige, er det forløjet. Kravet om særlovgivning kan ikke løse dette problem, og kravet om et juridisk Europa kan heller ikke gøre det.
If we differentiate here between the supposedly important life of a politi cian and the less valuable life of a citizen, then that is wrong.
Derfor kræver vi solidaritet med alle, der er ramt — enten det er af statslig eller ikke-statslig terror — og forhandlinger. ger.
We therefore call for solidarity with all those who are victims of terror, whether state-sponsored or not, and for discussions.
Tugendhat, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne give Kommissionens til slutning til den fordømmelse af terrorisme, som er kommet så alment til udtryk fra alle sider af salen og fra medlemmer af alle nationaliteter.
Mr Tugendhat, Vice-President of the Commission. — Mr President, I would like to associate the Commission with the condemnation of terrorism which has been so universally expressed on all sides of this House and by Members of all nationalities.
Også jeg ved lidt om, hvad terrorisme betyder, fordi jeg for fire år siden var så heldig at overleve et mordforsøg i Bruxelles. Tidligere på måneden var jeg ligesom sir Hen ry i Brighton, selv om jeg heldigvis ikke var så nær eksplosionsstedet, som han var.
I too know some thing of what terrorism means because four years ago
Jeg vil også gerne her minde om, at den franske regering har stillet forslag om i Paris
We have tabled amendments and shall, for the reasons I have stated, decline to support any other proposed amendments.
Tugendhat dem, vi skal huske i efterdønningerne afalle terrorist ugerninger, uanset om det er folk fra det offentlige eller fra det private liv, uanset om de er politikere eller andet.
It is appropriate for this House to condemn terrorism in the terms that it did because this House represents, it epitomizes, the shared values of all the peoples who go to make up the European Community, our shared belief in freedom under the law and in democracy.
Det er følgerne af terrorisme, som er slet te og forkerte, og det er godt, at Parlamentet, som symboliserer de værdier, der er fælles for europæere af alle nationaliteter, og som står for frihed under loven, demokrati og løsning af gamle uoverensstemmelser, fordømmer terrorismen i alle dens former.
It also, Mr President, is appropriate that this House should condemn terrorism in the terms that it did because the European Community itself epitomizes the capacity of mankind to reconcile ancient disputes within a framework, not just of law, but also of friend ship and building for the future.
Formanden. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
Mr Baudoin (RDE). — (FR) Now in connection with the affair of Jacques Abouchar, the French journalist, free information in a communist regime is considered a factor of disunity.
Forslag til beslutning af Ducarme m.fl. vedtoges)
Doctors are still getting through and so are journalists.
Domfældelse af Jacques Abouchar
Hence the perfunctory trial, with no proper defence, and Jacques Abouchar being con demned to 18 years' imprisonment. ,
Da vi hørte om dommen, blev vi både forbavsede og chokerede.
Mr President, those are the people we must remember.
For selv om vi alle håber, at Jacques Abouchar frigives om en må ned eller om et halvt eller helt år, så er sagen den, at manden i øjeblikket er ikendt en dom på atten år, og for et menneske, der er spærret inde mellem fire vægge, og som lever i et fængsel, er atten år en evighed.
They are the people we must remember in the aftermath of Brighton; but they are also the people we must remember in the aftermath of all terrorist atrocities regardless of whether or not the people are in public life or private life, regardless of whether or not they are politicians or anything else.
Derfor kræver vi med styrke at de sovjetiske myndigheder, der er medunderskrivere af Helsinki-slutakten, som vi ved, at sovjetrusserne tillagde stor betydning på tidspunktet for undertegnelsen, øver indflydelse på Kabul-regeringen for at få Jacques Abouchar frigivet. Vi erindrer endvidere om en passage i denne erklæring, hvori der udtrykkeligt står : Deltagerstaterne bekræfter, at journalister ikke kan straffes for legitim udøvelse af deres arbejde.
It is the effects of terrorism which are evil and wrong, and it is right that this House, which symbolizes the shared values of European peoples of all nationalities, and which stands for freedon under the law, democracy and the reconciliation of ancient disputes, should condemn terrorism in all its forms.
2-831/84/ændr.) af Såby m.fl. for den socialistiske gruppe om den franske journalist Jacques Abouchars dom på at ten års fængsel i Afghanistan;
Sentencing of Jacques Abouchar
Formanden. — Jeg beklager, hr. Baudouin, men De res taletid er opbrugt.
President. — The next item is the joint debate on:
2-837/84) af Baudoin og Anglade for gruppen europæisk demokratisk alliance om de afghanske myndigheders dom over en fransk journalist;
2-831/84/rev.) by Mr Saby and others, on behalf of the Socialist Group, on the 18-year prison sentence passed on the French journalist Jacques Abouchar in Afghanistan;
2-841/84) af Stirbois m.fl. for de europæiske højrepartiers gruppe om den franske journalist Jacques Abouchars dom på 18 års fængsel;
We all want Jacques Abouchar, who is facing 18 years in prison, to be freed in a month or in six months or a year. For someone incarverated within four walls, 18 years is an eternity.
2-847/84) af Mallet m.fl. for det europæiske folkepartis gruppe om dommen over Jacques Abouchar;
2-837/84) by Mr Baudouin and Mrs Anglade, on behalf of the European Democratic Alliance, on the sentencing of a French journalist by the Afghan authorities;
Stirbois (DR). — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, i mødeperioden fra den 9. til den 11. oktober fremsatte fire politiske grupper og heriblandt de europæiske højrepartiers gruppe et forslag til beslutning med an modning om aktuel og uopsættelig behandling.
Mr Stirbois (DR). — (FR) Mr President, honourable Members, during the session of 9-11 October, four political groups, including the Group of the European Right, tabled a motion for a resolution with a request
De europæiske højrepartiers gruppe anmodede i sit forslag Europa-Parlamentets med lemmer om at forlange af deres respektive regeringer, at disse suspenderer alle handelsmæssige og tekniske kontrakter med Sovjetunionen, så længe Jacques Abouchar ikke er løsladt, Selvfølgelig stod gruppen alene om dette konkrete forslag.
The day before yesterday, not four, but six motions for resolutions were tabled. Curiously enough, the Rainbow Group is still absent, but it is true that it takes more interest in banning the raising of chickens in cages and acid rain in Germany than poison gas in Afghanistan — that's a façade — and its members include people who protect terrorists, so it cannot take an interest in the fate of a journalist and the people of Afghanistan.
for nationalisternes, blev der ikke opnået enstemmighed mod sovjetrusserne.
And since — I shall stop here — the groups of liberals and moderates preferred the Communists' signature to the nationals', there could have been unanimity against the Soviets.
Vi advarer højtideligt de grupper, der ikke accepterede underskriften fra repræsentanter for mange millioner antimarxistiske italien ske, græske og franske vælgerne, mod at fortsætte sådanne angreb på demokratiets gode funktion i Par lamentet, idet vore fremtidige stemmeafgivninger el lers ikke vil være fri for bagtanke.
We solemnly warn the groups which failed to accept the signatures of representatives of several million Italian, Greek and French anti-marxist voters that, if such attacks on the proper functioning of democracy in our Parliament were to continue, this would be borne in mind in our future voting.
Endelig anmoder jeg på gruppens vegne om afstemning ved navn i forbindelse med vort forslag til beslutning nr. 841.
Lastly, on behalf of my Group, I call for a rollcall vote on our motion for a resolution No 841.
Derved får vi klarhed over, hvilke medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet der siger god for, at man foretrækker kommunisterne — der dog ellers er tilhængere af anklagerne i Abouchar-sagen — frem for dem, der har vist, at de støtter den afghanske modstandsbevægelse, og det vil vi gøre bekendt.
This will show us — and we shall broadcast it — which Euro-MPs have backed this choice of the Communists, who are in fact friends of the accused in the Abouchar affair, in preference to those who have shown they are the friends of the Afghan resistance.
Donnez (L). — (FR) Kære kolleger, når jeg har med underskrevet den fælles beslutning sammen med hr. Chinaud, hr. Beyer, de Rijke, hr. Deniau og hr. Nord mann så er det fordi vi har ment, at det var intet mindre end en regulær udfordring af menneskerettighederne, som de afghanske justitsmyndigheder fore tog ved med deres parodi på en retssag at idømme hr. Abouchar atten års fængsel.
Mr Donnez (L). — (FR) Honourable Members, if I signed the joint motion for a resolution along with my friends Roger Chinaud, Luc Beyer de tyke, Jean-François Deniau at Jean-Thomas Nordmann, it is because we felt that, after this parody of a trial in which Mr Abouchar was sentenced to 18 years in prison, the Afghan legal authorities were throwing down a veritable challenge to human rights.
Rent faktisk tog hr. Abouchar ikke til Afghanistan i nogen folkeforførerisk hensigt, men udelukkende for at søge information og viderebringe denne til de franske seere — hvilket ingen for øvrigt bestrider nu — og nu ved vi, at det koster atten års fængsel ulovligt at overskride en grænse i Afghanistan.
In fact, Mr Abouchar, as nobody now denies, went to Afghanistan, not with anything subversive in view, but simply to gather information and relay it to French television audiences and we now know that, in Afghanistan, an illegal frontier crossing gets you an 18-year sentence.
Man skulle tro, at man var vendt tilbage til stalinismens skændigste tider, og det er mod denne praksis, vi bør reagere.
We might well be back in the most shameful years of Stalinism. It is against such practices that we must speak out.
Derfor blev der lavet et nyt ændringsforslag.
So a further amendment has to be drafted.
De moderate grupper accepterede kommunisternes under tegnelse, og til trods for at nogle grupper undslog sig, hindredes de europæiske højrepartiers gruppe i at underskrive ændringsforslaget.
The moderate groups have accepted the Communists' signature and, once again, while some groups kept quiet, the Group of the European Right was prevented from signing the amendment.
Hvad er det, man vil give indtrykket af?
What is the idea?
At det er Jean-Marie le Pens til hængere, der myrder og fængsler folk i Afghanistan?
To make people think it is the friends of Jean-Marie Le Pen who are doing the killing and the imprisoning in Afghanistan? No.
Europa-Parlamentet er faktisk ikke andet end en udløber af den »firebande«, som befolkningen i vort land i stadig stigende grad afviser, fordi den er blevet træt af fusk og maskepi.
The European Parliament is in fact no more than an extension of the Gang of Four, that band which people in our country, who are tired of fudging and compromise, are rejecting to an ever-greater extent.
I denne sag føler jeg mig overbevist om, at mange medlemmer ikke er ansvarlige for denne situation, der er blevet dem påtvunget af deres gruppe. Man kommer ikke totalitarismen til livs ved at lægge svaghed for dagen.
I am con vinced that there are many MPs who are not responsible for the situation their group has forced upon them.
Det er indlysende, at de sovjetiske myndigheder vil have noget til gengæld for at løslade den franske journalist.
It is obvious that the Soviet authorities will want their quid pro quo before they let the French reporter go.
I går afholdt vor gruppe i et af Parlamentets lokaler en pressekonference med autentiske repræsentanter for den afghanske modstandsbevægelse. De forklarede, hvorfor sovjetrusserne ønskede at statuere et eksempel med Jacques Abouchar.
Yesterday, it was our group that took the initiative and organized a press conference with authentic representatives of the Afghan resistance in a room in Parliament.
Kommunisterne valgte en ny strategi : lukning af grænserne, forøgelse af presset mod mod standsbevægelsen, siden marts afsendelse af 70 000 sovjetrusserne fra eliteenheder udover de 170 000, der allerede er på stedet, intensivering af den krig der i fællesskab føres af KGB og den røde armé, jagt på guerillastyrkerne med helikopterenheder, organisere de offensiver der på samme tid går i fem forskellige retninger.
The communists have gone in for a new strategy — closing the frontiers, increasing the pressure against the resistance, sending 70 000 Soviets from crack regiments — since March — to join the 130 000 others, stepping up the war which the KGB and the Red Army are fighting together, helicoptering in troops to hound the guerillas and making offensives on five fronts at once.
Vi mener, at denne krænkelse af menneskerettighederne bør forfølges, og af hensyn til mine kolleger på venstrefløjen — eller den såkaldte venstrefløj — skal jeg citere Jaurès, der sagde, at mod er det samme som at søge sandheden og at udråbe den.
We think we have to take up this challenge to human rights and I would remind my colleagues on the left — or the pretended left — of something Jaurès said: 'Courage is seeking and speaking the truth'.
Hr. Abouchar prøvede netop på at finde sandheden.
Mr Abouchar tried to seek the truth.
For at udråbe den under det sovjetisk-afghanske regime er prisen atten års fængsel.
Speaking it in a Russo-Afghan regime gets you 18 years in prison.
Jeg tvivler ikke et eneste øjeblik om, at de frie mennesker, der udgør forsamlingen her, kan samles om dette forslag til beslutning, om ikke af andre grunde så for at bevise, at også vi har til hen sigt at søge sandheden og at udråbe den.
I do not for one moment doubt that the men of liberty who make up this House will all be together on this motion for a resolution — even if it is only to show that we too intend to seek and speak the truth.
han nægtes enhver kontakt med sine pårørende og med repræsentanter for sin regering, og som er domfældet uden frit at kunne vælge sit forsvar.
Everything has been said about this intolerable and arbitrary act and about the denial of the rights of a prisoner who is being deprived of all contact with his family and the representatives of his Government and who was condemned without being able to choose anyone to defend him.
Alt er sagt om denne krænkelse af informationsfriheden, om denne udfordring af frie mennesker, der har været så naive at tro på slutakten fra Helsinki.
Everything has been said about this challenge to free dom of information and to the free nations who were naive enough to believe in the Final Act of Helsinki.
Chambeiron (COM). — (FR) Hr. formand, de franske medlemmer af gruppen af kommunister og beslægtede har som bekendt fremsat et beslutningsforslag med anmodning om frigivelse af den franske journalist Jacques Abouchar.
This is why we sought very broad agreement between all the European democrats on the European Parliament's taking a step that was likely to make a useful contribution to freeing Jacques Abouchar. The joint amendment before you reflects this agreement well and it will, I am sure, get massive approval.
Men skal man fremover tie, fordi alt allerede er sagt?
And now that everything has been said, should we now be silent?
Nej, selvfølgelig ikke!
Certainly not!
Vi bør ikke tøve med at gentage det samme, det der er rigtigt, gentage de samme principper, fordi de er retfærdige.
Let us not hesitate to repeat the same things, for they are true. Let us not hesitate to repeat the same principles, for they are right.
Sovjetrusserne og afghanerne har øjensynlig regnet med et træthedsfænomen i forventning om, at en anden hændelse ville fortrænge den foreliggende fra avisernes spalter.
Mr Chambeiron (COM). — (FR) Mr President, the French members of the Communist and Allies Group have, as you know, tabled a resolution calling for the French journalist, Jacques Abouchar, to be released.
Det påhviler os gennem alle former for aktion at bevise for dem, at de har taget fejl : ved afstemningen i dag, ved visumansøgninger og ved demonstrationer, så vi derved kan bevise for dem, at en fri journalists anholdelse skader dem langt mere end den reportage, han kunne have lavet.
Obviously, the Russo-Afghans have staked everything on the situation being defused, hoping some other event will push it out of the papers. We must use every means to show them that they are wrong and prove to them with our vote today and with visa applications and demonstrations that, ultimately, detaining a free journalist is doing much more harm than the report he should have brought back.
Atten års fængsel for at overskride en grænse er åbentlyst en for streng straf.
That means we do not accept the verdict of the Afghan courts.
Så meget desto mere som Jacques Abouchar ikke har gjort andet end mange kolleger i lignende situationer.
An 18-year sentence is out of all pro portion to an illegal frontier crossing, particularly since Jacques Abouchar only did what many of his colleagues do in similar circumstances.
Jeg gentager derfor, at vi kræver Jacques Abouchar frigivet.
So, I repeat, we demand that Jacques Abouchar be set free.
Jeg skal endog tilføje, at det er vort eneste formål. Det er af den grund, at de franske medlemmer af gruppen af kommunister og beslægtede beklager, at deres forslag ikke kommer til afstemning, og at det erstattes af kompromisforslaget, hvis vendinger efter vor opfattelse går udover opnåelsen af dette mål.
I would go so far as to add that this is our only aim, which is why the French members of the Communist and Allies Group regret that their resolution cannot be put to the vote and is being replaced by a compromise amend ment couched in terms which, I think, go beyond this aim.
Vi er bekendt med den selektive karakter af en del af forsamlingens harme.
We know about the selective nature of the indignation of a certain section of this House.
Vi har tilstrækkelig tydeligt mærket holdningen her i salen, da talen var om Syd afrika, Chile og Tyrkiet.
We saw enough of its behaviour here when we were discussing South Africa and Chile and Turkey.