natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Trods en protestskrivelse fra Rådet med påstand om over skridelse af Parlamentets dispositionsmargen, bliver dette budget endeligt vedtaget af formanden.
The President adopted the budget, despite a letter of protest from the Council claiming that the EP had exceeded its margin of manoeuvre.
Efter beslutningerne truffet på Det Europæiske Råds møde i Fontainebleau præges behandlingen af tillægsbudgettet for 1984 af problematikken i forbindelse med tilbagebetalingerne til Det Forenede Kongerige.
Following the conclusions of the European Council in Fontainebleau in 1984, the procedure for the adoption of the 1984 supplementary budget was dominated by the issue of the British refunds.
Som følge af manglen de enighed om forhøjelsen af EF's andel af det nationale momsprovenu forelægger Rådet et tillægsbudget, der skal finansieres over bidrag fra medlemsstaterne, der skal tilbagebetales.
In the absence of agreement on raising the proportion of VAT in own resources, the Council submitted a supplementary budget to be financed by repayable advances from the Member States.
Parlamentet godkender sluttelig denne fremgangsmåde, men fastholder sine afvigende synspunkter i forbindelse med andre indtægter, og dokumenterer dermed, at dets budgetbeføjelser også omfatter indtægterne, og ikke blot udgifterne
The EP finally approved of this approach but adhered to its differing views on other estimates of expenditure, thereby demonstrating that its budgetary powers extended to revenue as well as expenditure.
Budgettet for 1985
— 1985 budget
Budgetbehandlingen er præget af uenighed mellem Rådet og EP om opdelingen af udgifterne (obligatoriske eller ikke-obligatoriske udgifter); dette har konsekvenser for omfanget af EP's dispositionsmargen ved forhøjelsen af de ikke-obligatoriske udgifter.
The budgetary procedure was marked by disagreement between the Council and the EP about the classification of expenditure (compulsory or non-compulsory expenditure) and this affected the EP's scope for raising the level of non-compulsory expenditure.
Parlamentet står fast på sit synspunkt, navnlig fordi Rådet på trods af gentagne opfordringer vægrer sig ved at indlede forhandlinger om opdelingsproblemerne.
The EP persisted in its attitude, all the more so because the Council, despite repeated appeals, refused to enter into negotiations on the problems of classification.
EP ved tager budgettet, omend Parlamentet efter Rådets opfattelse har overskredet sin margen.
The EP adopted the budget, although the Council considered that Parliament had overstepped the bounds of its sphere of competence.
I tiden derefter indledes der forhandlinger om opdelingsproblematikken og den 30. juni 1982 offentliggøres en fælleserklæring om forskellige foran
Subsequently negotiations were held on the question of classification and on 30 June 1982 a Joint Declaration was issued on 'various measures
Parlamentet konstaterer ved sin førstebehandling, at navnlig landbrugsudgifterne kun er skøn net for 10 og ikke for 12 måneder, og ydermere, at tilbagebetalingerne til Det Forenede Kongerige og Tyskland ikke er opført under udgifterne. Da
During its first reading the EP established that agricultural expenditure, in particular, was covered for only 10 months rather than 12 months and that the repayments to the UK and Germany were not entered as expenditure.
Budgettet for 1988
— 1988 budget
For første gang er Rådet ikke i stand til at overholde fristen den 5. oktober 1987 for forelæg gelse af budgetforslaget 1988.
In 1987 the Council was for the first time unable to submit the draft budget for 1988 by the deadline of 5 October.
Parlamentet anlægger derpå passivitetssøgsmål mod Rådet ved EF-Domstolen.
The EP reacted by bringing an action before the Court of Justice on the grounds of the Council's failure to act.
Først efter Det Europæiske Råd den 12. og 13. februar 1988 i Bruxelles har vedtaget en finansreform og nye egne indtægter til sikring af Fælleskabets akvitlvteter, forelæg ger Rådet budgetforslaget for 1988.
Only after the European Council had decided at its meeting of 12 and 13 February 1988 in Brussels on a financial reform and new own resources to ensure the financing of the Community's activities, did the Council submit the draft budget for 1988.
Parlamentet vedtager i den forbindelse moderate stigninger uden at udnytte sin margen ved betalingerne fuldt ud, og vedtaget budgettet for 1988 den 18. maj 1988.
The EP decided on moderate increases without completely using up its margin of manoeuvre and adopted the 1988 budget on 18 May 1988.
Da dette budget imidlertid - inden ratificeringen af den nye ordning om de egne indtægter - må finansieres over forskudsbidrag fra medlemsstaterne på grundlag af en aftale mellem regeringerne, og der stadig hersker uenighed i Rådet om opdelingen af disse for skud, bliver formanden for EP opfordret til at sikre sig, at de i budgettet opførte udgifter mod svares af indtægter i tilsvarende omfang.
However, since pending ratification of the own resources regulation by the Member States this budget still had to be financed by contributions from the Member States on the basis of an intergovernmental agreement, but there remained disagreement in the Council regarding the apportioning of these contributions, the President of Parliament was urged to ascertain that the expenditure entered in the budget was matched by equivalent income before he finally adopted the budget.
For manden vedtager endeligt budgettet for 1988 den 1. juni 1988.
He did so on 1 June 1988.
(Oversigt over indtægts- og udgiftsskøn i budgettet for 1988 i bilag).
(A summary of the income and expenditure entered in the 1988 budget is given below.)
Parlamentet konstaterer ved sin førstebehandling, at det af Rådet forelagte forslag ikke inde holder tilstrækkelige bevillinger til dækning af udgifterne ved Spaniens og Portugals tiltræden, navnlig for så vidt angår strukturfondene, og at betalingsbevillingerne er utilstrækkelige i forhold til forpligtelsesbevillingerne fra de foregående år (problemet med de såkaldte »fortidens byrder«).
During the first reading the EP ascertained that the Council's draft did not include sufficient funding to cover the costs of the accession of Spain and Portugal, in particular as far as the structural Funds were concerned, and that the payment appropriations were inadequate when compared with the commitment appropriations from previous years (the 'burden of the past').
EP vedtager efter sin andenbehandling et 1986-budget på 33,3 mia ecu, der dermed ligger 629 mio ecu højere en det andet forslag fra Rådet.
After its second reading the EP adopted a 1986 budget of ECU 33.3 billion, i.e. ECU 629 million higher than the Council's second draft.
Trods protester fra formanden for Rådet over Parlamentets overskridelse af maksimalsatsen, bliver dette budget endeligt vedtaget af formanden.
Despite the President of the Council's protest that the EP had exceeded the upper limit the budget was adopted by the President of Parliament.
Rådet og en række medlemsstater indgiver derefter klage til EF-Domstolen, der med dom af 3. juli 1986 ophæver vedtagelsen af 1986-budgettet og samtidig opstiller en række vigtige principper for forbindelserne mellem Par lamentet og Rådet og deres beføjelser i forbin delse med budgetbehandlingen.
In response to this the Council and a number of Member States brought an action before the European Court of Justice, which, in its judgment of 3 July 1986, annulled the adoption of the 1986 budget and established some important principles for the structuring of relations between Parliament and the Council and their powers in the budgetary procedure.
På grundlag af en ændringsskrivelse fra Kommissionen imødekommer Rådet i vidt omfang Parlamentets krav, således at der i juli 1986 kan vedtages et budget for 1986, der ligger 1,86 mia ecu over det i december vedtagne budget
On the basis of a letter of amendment from the Commission, the Council then largely agreed to the EP's demands and in July 1986 a budget was adopted for that year, ECU 1.86 billion higher than the budget adopted in December.
Budgettet for 1987 og tillægsbudget for 1987
— 1987 budget and 1987 supplementary budget
Budgetbehandlingen er præget af udtømningen af de egne Indtægter.
The budgetary procedure was marked by concern about the exhaustion of own resources.
Parlamentet vedtager under sin førstebehandling budgetændringer, der sigter mod at foranledige Rådet til at tage effektive skridt til bekæmpelse af landbrugsoverskuddene og samtidig genopføre de bevillinger til forsknings- og udviklingspolitikken, som Rådet havde slettet i Kommissionens foreløbidge bud getforslag. Rådet kan ikke tiltræde dette i forbin delse med sin andenbehandling.
During its first reading the EP decided on amendments designed to induce the Council to take drastic measures to combat agricultural surpluses and reinstate for research and development policy the appropriations which the Council deleted from the Commission's preliminary draft.
Parlamentet vedtager til slut et bud get og overskrider i forbindelse med de ikke-obligatoriske udgifter den fastsatte maksimale stignlngssats.
In the end the EP approved a budget which exceeded the maximum rate of increase for non-compulsory expenditure.
Med udgangspunkt i Domstolens dom om budgettet for 1986 er formanden for EP ikke rede til endeligt af vedtage dette budget.
In accordance with the Court of Justice's judgment on the 1986 budget the President of Parliament was not prepared finally to adopt such a budget.
Da der i mellemtiden er truffet bslutnlnger i Rådet med henblik på en inddæmning af landbrugsoverskuddene og de hermed forbundne omkostninger, og Rådet komme Parlamentet i møde med en -ganske vist meget beskeden - forhøjelse af maksimalsatsen, vedtager Parlamentet I februar 1987 budgettet for 1987, som derefter bliver endelig vedtaget af formanden
Since the Council had meanwhile decided to take action to curb agricultural surpluses and their costs and had allowed the EP a rise — albeit very modest — in the maximum rate of increase, the EP approved the 1987 budget in February 1987 and it was adopted finally by the President.
I juli 1987 forelægger Rådet et tillægsbudget for 1987, der ganske vist ikke indeholder forslag om
In July 1987 the Council submitted a supplementary budget for 1987, but it contained no provisions for financing the deficit in the agricultural fund and simply carried over the deficits to the 1988 financial year, without any indication as to how they might be financed.
OVERSIGT OVER INDTÆGTS- OG UDGIFTSSKØN I BUDGETTET FOR 1988
SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE IN THE 1988 BUDGET1
OVERSIGT OVER INDTÆGTERNE I BUDGETTET FOR 1988
SUMMARY OF REVENUE IN THE 1988 BUDGET million ECU
I ALT2)
Total
Medlemsstater
Customs duties
Landbrugsafgifter
Agricultural levies
Afgifter på sukker og isoglukose
Levies on sugar and isoglucose
Kongerige Andre indtægter og overskud 1987
1 119.6 and 1987 surplus
OVERSIGT OVER BEVILLINGERNE I BUDGETTET FOR 1988
SUMMARY OF RESOURCES MADE AVAILABLE UNDER THE 1988 BUDGET million ECU
Forskning, energi, industri Samarbejde og udvikling
Environmental and Consumer policy
I til 5 i alt
Total for 1—5
') Inkl. øvrige udgifter inden for områderne landbrug, valutareserve og lagerafvikling.
Including other expenditure in connection with agriculture, monetary reserves and disposal of stocks.
Rådets afgørelse af 7. maj 1985 om ordningen med Fællesskabernes egne indtægter (art. 3).
Council decision of 7 May 1985 on the Communities' system of own resources (Article 3).
På grund af den nye indtægtskilde - beregnet på grundlag af bruttonationalindkomsten - vil der dog ske følgende ændringer: momsandelen af Det Forenede Kongeriges betalinger, der hidtil var blevet anvendt ved beregningen, suppleres med indrageisen af den nye fjerde indtægtskilde, altså andelen af bruttonationalindkomsten (med en udligningsordning, hvis ikke den effekt, som indførelse af den fjerde indtægtskilde medfører for Det Forenede Kongerige, er tilstrækkelig).
introduction of the new source of revenue based on GNP, the following modifications are to be made: the percentage share of VAT in the United Kingdom's payments hitherto considered in calculations, is to be supplemented by the inclusion of the new fourth source of revenue (proportion of GNP) together with a corrective mechanism, in case the effect of the introduction of the fourth source of revenue on the United Kingdom is not adequate.
Denne udligning for Det Forenede Kongerige finansieres af de øvrige 11 medlemsstater på grundlag af en BNP-fordelingsnøgle.
This adjustment for the benefit of the United Kingdom is financed by the other 11 Member States on the basis of a GNP key, Germany's contribution being reduced by one third and those of Spain and Portugal reduced by the percentages laid down in Articles 187 and 374 of the Treaties of Accession.
I den forbindelse reduceres Tysklands bidrag med en tredjedel, og Spaniens og Portugals bidrag reduceres i overensstemmelse med artikel 187 og 374 i tiltrædelsestraktaterne.
BACKGROUND: When, at the meeting of Heads of State and Government held on 9 and 10 December 1974 in Paris, it was decided to set up a European Regional Development Fund, the Community institutions were asked to produce without delay a corrective mechanism to avoid the possibility of a situation arising during the process of convergence of the economies of the Member States which was unacceptable to a Member State and incompatible with the proper functioning of the Community.
På daværende tidspunkt indførtes udligningsmekanismen med henblik på en nedsættelse af Det Forenede Kongeriges bidrag til EF's egne Indtægter - som ansloges til 22% af EF's budget - fordi Det Forenede Kongeriges bruttonationalprodukt udgjorde omkring 16%.
At this point, the intention of the corrective mechanism was to reduce the United Kingdom's contribution to the Community's own resources, which was estimated at 22% of the Community budget while its GDP was about 16% of the Community total.
Med Rådets forordning nr. 1172/76 af 17.5.76 indførtes en finansieringsordning med henblik på at mindske forskellen mellem en medlemsstats indbetalinger til EF's egne indtægter og det beløb, den pågældende medlemsstat skulle betale, hvis denne stats bidrag til de egne indtægter skulle svare til den andel, dens bruttonationalprodukt (BNP) udgør af summen af med lemsstaternes BNP.
Council Regulation No 1172/76 of 17 May 1976 created a financial mechanism to reduce a Member State's overpayment of own resources by comparison with the amount it would have had to pay if own resources were calculated on the basis of the proportion of its GNP to the total GNP of the Member States.
EUROPA-PARLAMENTETS HOLDNING: EP påpegede, da dette problem opstod i 1976, at denne meknisme kunne skade ordningen med EF's egne indtægter.
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT'S (EP) ATTITUDE was at first, in 1976, to take note of a mechanism which it regarded as potentially harmful to the Community's system of own resources.
Da dette spørgsmål igen blev taget op i 1979 og ikke længere behandledes som forskellen mellem en med lemsstats indbetalinger til EF's egne Indtægter og denne stats ydeevne udtrykt i BNP, men som et nettounderskud, fremsatte EP en række vigtige indvendinger, idet det understregede, at generel anvendelse af princippet om fuld kompensation kunne bringe solidariteten mellem medlemslandene i fare og overflødiggøre enhver form for fælles finansiering, og at EP's beføjelser krænkedes, i det øjeblik tilbagebetalingerne fastsattes ved forordning og ikke gennem den normale budgetprocedure.
When the problem re-emerged in 1979, no longer as an overpayment of own resources in relation to a State's ability to contribute, expressed in terms of GNP, but as a net budget deficit, the EP emphasized several major objections: the danger of a widening of the principle of 'fair returns' which destroys Community solidarity and the point of any common financing, and the circumvention of the EP's budgetary powers where the size of the repayments is laid down by regulation rather than by budgetary procedure.
I december 1982 forkastede EP endog det udkast til tillægsbudget, Rådet havde frem sat, for at dets beslutning om for tredje gang at give finansielle kompensationer kunne gennemføres over budgettet.
In December 1982 the EP went so far as to reject the draft supplementary budget presented by the Council to put into budgetary terms its decision to grant financial compensation for a third time.
EP havde Ikke kunnet opnå Rådets garanti for at:
Parliament had been unable to obtain assurances from the Council on three points:
— disse særlige kompensationsforanstaltninger var de sidste
— that these would be the last special compensatory measures;
— budgetforslaget ville blive ændret, således at disse særlige foranstaltninger blev inddraget som et led i eksisterende fællesskabspolitikker
— that the draft budget would be amended in order to re-insert these special measures into the framework of existing common policies;
— disse særlige foranstaltninger ville blive opført som ikke-obligatoriske udgifter, således at EP kun ne stille ændringsforslag hertil.
— that the special measures would be treated as non-compulsory expenditure, so that the EP would be in a position to table amendments.
HIDTIDIGE RESULTATER: I den følgende tid var tilbagebetalingerne til Det Forenede Kongerige igen og igen et stridsspørgsmål i forbindelse med udarbejdelsen af det årlige budgetforslag.
ACHIEVEMENTS: In subsequent years the refunds to the United Kingdom were repeatedly a subject of dispute when the annual budget was being drawn up.
Fra 1980 til 1984 blev tilbagebetalingernes omfang fastsat på grundlag af enkeltafgørelser truffet af Rådet, første gang i 1980 med 1 175 mio ecu for 1980 og 1 410 mio ecu for 1981, så 850 mio ecu for 1982 og 370 mio ecu for 1983.
Between 1980 and 1984 the amount of the refund was determined each year in separate decisions by the Council, first with a sum of ECU 1 175 million for 1980 and ECU 1 410 million for 1981, followed by ECU 850 million for 1982 and ECU 370 million for 1983.
Endelig blev Det Europæiske Råd i Fontainebleau den 25. og 26. juni 1984 enig om, at enhver medlemsstat, der bærer en for stor budgetbyrde i forhold til sin relative velstand, i givet fald kan drage fordel af en udligningsforanstaltning.
The European Council of 25 and 26 June 1984 in Fontainebleau finally agreed that any Member State which was bearing a disproportionate share of the budget burden in terms of its relative prosperity should benefit from a corrective mechanism.
En sådan udligningsforanstaltning blev samtidig fastsat for Det Forenede Kongerige og medtaget i Rådets afgørelse af 7. maj 1985 om ordningen med Fællesskabernes egne ind tægter.
There was also provision for such a corrective mechanism to be applied to the United Kingdom and this formed part of the Council decision of 7 May 1985 on the system of Community own resources.
Herefter trækkes for regnskabsåret 1985 et forud fastsat beløb på 1 000 mio ecu fra det momsbeløb, som skal betales af Det Forenede Kongerige.
Under these arrangements the United Kingdom could deduct ECU 1 000 million from its VAT contribution in the 1985 financial year.
Fremover modtager Storbritannien desuden 66% af forskellen mellem den procentmæssige andel i sine momsbetalinger og de samlede tildelte udgifter.
Thereafter Britain was to receive 66% of the difference between the percentage share of VAT payments and its share of total allocated expenditure.
Den ne udligning tildeles i form af en nedsættelse af momsbetalingerne for det følgende år.
This correction is applied in the form of a reduction in value added tax contributions in the following year.
Samtidig gav Det Europæiske Råd imidlertid i sin konklusion udtryk for den opfattelse, at EF's udgiftspolitik inden for en
The European Council also expressed the view in its conclusions, however, that within the near future Community expenditure policy would be the most effective way of settling the question of budget imbalances.
EP understregede på ny i sin udtalelse om forslaget fra Kommissionen til Rådet til afgørelse om ordningen med egne indtægter, der førte til Rådets afgørelse af 7. maj 1985, at det finansielle problem, der skyldes, at medlemsstaternes økonomiske kapacitet og deres andel i finansieringen af fællesskabsbudgettet stilles over for hinanden, skal løses ved at tage udgangspunkt I udgifterne til fællesskabspolitikkerne, og ikke ved - på indtægtssiden - at reducere indbetalingerne til
In its opinion on the proposal from the Commission to the Council for the decision on the Communities' system of own resources of 7 May 1985, the EP reaffirmed that the financial discrepancies revealed by comparison of the economic potential of the Member States and their relative contributions to the Community budget should be redressed by expenditure as part of Community policies rather than on the revenue side by reducing transfers of own resources.
PE 122.000 de egne Indtægter.
The Council did not accept this.
EP foreslog derfor, at problemet vedrørende den finansielle udligning ikke skulle løses inden for rammerne af ordningen med egne Indtægter, men derimod på grundlag af en særlig ordning I form af en forordning fra Rådet.
The solution which has now been devised, whereby the compensatory payments to the United Kingdom are financed by the Member States, was accepted by the EP, which noted that these payments were no longer a drain on the revenue side of the budget.
Dette forslag har Rådet ikke tilsluttet sig.
It nevertheless emphasized that this new system of own resources could only be a transitional solution.
Den løsning, man nu har fundet med hensyn til finansieringen af udligningsbetalingerne til Det Forenede Kongerige gennem medlemsstaterne blev accepteret af EP med henvisning til, at disse betalinger Ikke længere belaster budgettets Indtægtsside.
In June 1988 the Council adopted a new decision on the Community's system of own resources in accordance with the conclusions of the European Council meeting in Brussels from 11 to 13 February 1988.
Det blev dog samtidig understreget, at denne nye ordning for de egne indtægter kun kan være en over gangsløsning.
This decision states that the conclusions of the European Council of June 1984 in Fontainebleau on the correction of budgetary imbalances will remain applicable for as long as the new decision on own resources remains in force. However, because of the
D. DET STORE INDRE MARKED
D. THE LARGE INTERNAL MARKET
Indførelsen af FTT og EF's myndighed til at forvalte den og forhandle med tredjelande om den har på afgørende vis bidraget til at få EF anerkendt som sådant inden for en lang række internationale organisationer (GATT).
The context powers by the Community in its administration and in carrying out negotiations with third countries led to the development of a Community trade policy and made a decisive contribution to achieving recognition for the EEC as a body in its own right in many international organizations (GATT).
RETSGRUNDLAG: Traktatens præambel og artikel 2, 3 og 8A (principperne); artikel 9-29 (toldunionen); artikel 30-37 (ophævelse af de kvantitative restriktioner); artikel 48-73 (den frie bevægelighed for personer, tjenesteydelser og kapital); artikel 100-102 (tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne); artikel 108 og 109 (beskyttelsesklausuler).
LEGAL BASIS: Preamble and Articles 2, 3 and 8a (principles); Article 929 (customs union); Articles 30-37 (elimination of quantitative restrictions); Articles 48-73 (free movement of persons, services and capital); Articles 100-102 (approximation of laws); Articles 108 and 109 (safeguard clauses).
Artikel 8A, 8B, 8C, 28, 57, stk. 2, 59, 70, stk. 1, 84, 99, 100A og 100B, der er erstattet, ændret eller tilføjet i EØF-Traktaten ved Den Europæiske Fælles Akt, vedrører hovedsagelig den gradvise gennemførelse af det indre marked.
Articles 8a, 8b, 8c, 28, 57(2), 59, 70(1), 84, 99, 100a and 100b, replaced amended or added to the Treaty by the Single European Act (SEA), refer in particular to the gradual establishment of the internal market.
MÅL: I Rom-Traktaten er fastsat det mål at skabe et fælles marked for samtlige EF-lande.
At the end of the transition period the initial outlines of the common market were drawn in.