natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Derfor komplimenterer min gruppe Kommissionen for skarpsindigheden og det konstitutionelle potentiel i dens forslag, og vi komplimenterer hr. Arndt for hans realitetssans i det beslutningsforslag, han har forelagt.
We received it just when we were preparing, by means of the Arndt report — a report, in fact, which summarized everything that Parliament had already said ; a succinct, even modest report, I would say, with no very great pretensions — to urge both the Commission and the Council once more to take this course.
Barbarella (COM). — (IT) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne indledningsvis fremhæve, hvad jeg synes er to fortjenstfulde sider ved det forslag, som kommis særerne Thorn og Tugendhat netop har belyst for os.
And we are satisfied, also, both that the present system of own resources has been confirmed, with VAT remaining as its fundamental source of finance — as this Parliament had insisted — and, above all, because that source of finance is to be gradually increased, with a special and indeed wise decisionmaking procedure for subsequent steps.
Det har altid stået klart for os, at der ikke kunne ske fremskridt i retning af forøgelse eller spredning af Fællesskabets egne indtægter uden et samtidigt frem skridt i retning af en kontrol med udgifterne til den fælles landbrugspolitik.
Undoubtedly, the indicator mechanism for modulating contributions, by means of which the Commission proposes to lighten the British and German contributions, as a transitional measure, will give rise to argument and discussion — as it has already done hefe.
Barbi lige understregede, men det er dog forslag.
Parliament's role in pushing for greater balance has been essential in the past.
I dag kan vi derfor kun glæde os over, at Kommissionen omsider fuldt ud har påtaget sig sit ansvar, og at den dermed også stiller regeringerne i Stuttgart over for deres.
It may take years and I am glad that provision for this has been made in the resolution.
Hr. formand, som afslutning på disse korte betragtninger vil jeg sige, at skønt vi er klar over de farer, der ligger i dette forslag, mener vi, at det er meget betydningsfuldt og i mange henseender stort set positivt.
For this purpose we have presented an amendment to the proposal put forward by Mrs Scrivener, in which we urge the need for a decision on own resources in relation to the enlargement of the Community to include Spain and Portugal.
Den anden fortjeneste ved dette forslag er efter min mening, at det — om man vil — udgør en slags provokation: især synes jeg, at landbrugsafsnittet må forstås i den retning.
So my group congratulates the Commission on the subtlety and the constitutional potential of its propo sals and we congratulate Mr Arndt on his realism in the resolution which he has put before us.
Men jeg tror dog, at det fortjenstfulde — uanset enighed eller uenighed — består deri, at man endelig klart og modigt har sat spørgsmålet på dagsordenen om landbrugsudgifterne og det dermed forbundne spørgsmål om Storbritanniens budgetmæssige uligevægt. vægt.
Mr Balfour (ED). — Mr President, this House knows well the budgetary principles which have guided our group during our long debates in committee and in the plenary session of this Parliament these last four years.
Scrivener (L). — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, Fællesskabet står over for et vendepunkt i sin beståen, fordi det i realiteten på kort sigt er truet af ganske enkelt ikke at kunne overholde sine forpligtelser.
Mrs Barbarella (COM). — (IT) Mr President, I should like first of all to emphasize what appear to me to be two meritorious aspects of the proposal that Commissioner Thorn and Commissioner Tugendhat have just expounded to us.
Hr. Tugendhat skitserede for os i sidste uge i Bruxelles de overordnede linjer for 1984-budgettet, og vi har kunnet konstatere, at man rundt regnet når op til loftet for Fællesskabets egne indtægter.
It was always clear to us that no progress towards an extension or diversification of the Community's own resources could be made without simultaneous progress towards controlling CAP expenditure.
I denne forbindelse har hr. Thorn netop præsenteret os for et udkast til Fællesskabets fremtidige finansiering.
The Commission has at last presented its specific proposals and we have been given a resolution by the Committee on Budgets to wind up this debate.
Det forekommer mig, at princippet om Fællesskabets finansielle solidaritet delvis kommer til kort i dette forslag, dog sikkert i mindre negativ målestok, end det ville have været tilfældet med de andre fremsatte forslag — jeg hentyder til »tunnelen« for staternes maksimale bidrag.
This seems to me to be very important because — it has to be said — in recent years we have become unaccustomed to the Commission's taking up firm positions : what with memoranda, analyses and documents of one kind or another, they had seemed almost to wait for prior agreement from the Governments.
Alligevel synes jeg, at dette forslag betegner et tilbageskridt i forhold til det, der var et grundlæggende princip for Fællesskabet.
Today, therefore, we can only rejoice that the Commission has finally accepted its full responsibilities and, in doing so, has brought the Governments at Stuttgart face to face with theirs.
Naturligvis vil Parlamentet i løbet af de kommende måneder tage initiativ til at komme med en uddybende udtalelse om dette udkast.
We have never believed that the 1 % ceiling should forever remain the limit of the Community's financial competence.
Men jeg finder det hensigtsmæssigt allerede nu og nogle uger før det kommende europæiske topmøde at anstille nogle betragtninger over dette emne.
Along with the Commission and the Arndt resolution we believe that conditions can be created for diversifying and extending the Com munity's taxation.
Jeg tror ikke, at det er retfærdighedsprincippet, som vækker den største bekymring i forslaget dvs. en ligelig deltagelse i fællesskabsbudgettet fra alle medlemsstaternes side.
We support absolutely the budgetary principles now proposed for spreading the cost of CAP expenditure among those who can most afford it and those who most contribute to the cost.
En anden grund til bekymring er, at dette forslag efter min mening faktisk ikke løser problemet om landbrugets overskudslagre.
The second advantage of this proposal seems to me to be that it offers, if you like, an element of provocation : the agricultural part in particular seems rather like that to me.
Når man siger kompromis, siger man også fordele og ulemper for hvert enkelt medlemsland.
Mr Arndt has said that he does not altogether like the VAT modulation proposed by the Commission.
Endvidere foreslår Kom misionen en hævning af momsloftet.
Yet we see merit in it.
Vi støtter dette forslag, som er den eneste virkelige løsning, hvis Fællesskabet ikke midlertidigt skal komme til at befinde sig i en blokeringssituation.
It takes into account, perhaps for the first time in any Community fiscal proposal, the principle of capacity to pay.
Hvad vi derimod må spørge Kommissionen om, er, på hvilken måde det i en mellemlang og lang periode vil være muligt at nå frem til et fællesskabsbudget, hvor land brugets andel vejer meget mindre; om det så er 33 %, 35 % eller 40 % tror jeg ikke har afgørende betyd
Having said this, and without wishing to go into the details of the proposal — since that would take too much time — I should nevertheless like to ask this
Scrivener over Fællesskabets eksistens, men vi har også forpligtelsen til at forsøge at afværge den.
Barbarella with the reality of a situation for which the Com munity has so far failed to find an answer, although it has been predicted for a long time.
Vi tilslutter os uden videre princippet, og vi tilslutter os ligeledes det valg — således vil jeg udtrykke det —, der går ud på at hæve momsloftet.
I should like to take this opportunity to thank him for his proposals, and Mr Tugendhat also.
Naturligvis ville en forhøjelse af loftet, som ikke blev fulgt op af et meget strengt kontrolsystem, ikke få vor tilslutning. Men Kommissionen har fastsat en tærskel mekanisme.
Assembly what is, in my view, a very important ques tion : what is the price that we shall have to pay, where Community principles and acquisitions are concerned, if we accept this proposal ?
Man kan sikkert forestille sig andre mekanismer, men man må konstatere, at Kommis sionen har foreslået et sammenhængende system.
I think that it embodies certain objective risks, and we cannot blind ourselves to that fact.
Dels beroliger det medlemslandene, eftersom det kræver Rådets enstemmighed for at forøge de egne indtægter, dels tilfredsstiller det et efterhånden gammelt krav fra Parlamentet om at få klarhed over dets deltagelse i beslutningsprocessen med hensyn til indtægterne.
I think that the principle of the financial solidarity of the Community has suffered something of a setback by the proposal : less, of course, than would have been the case with the other proposal put forward — I refer here to the maximalist 'tunnels'.
Har man ikke alt for ofte hørt, at Parlamentet skulle have tilbøjelighed til at bruge for meget, fordi det ikke var ansvarligt for budgetindtægterne?
Nevertheless, it seems to me that this proposal is a retrograde step in regard to what was one of the basic principles of the Community.
Kommissionens forslag indebærer den fordel, at man, for så vidt angår det britiske bidrag, undgår de foregående års ad hoc-løsninger.
I do not think that the proposal is concerned mainly with equity, i.e. a fair share of the Community budget for all Member States.
Dette modulationssystem må imidlertid nødvendigvis efter prøves gennem beregningssammenligninger, som vi på nuværende tidspunkt endnu ikke har.
We must, however, be honest : it does contain a suggestion of 'fair return', and this is a first reason for concern.
I øjeblikket har vi altså en velvillig forhåndsindstilling med hensyn til de forslag, som vi har fået forelagt.
A second reason for concern in my view is that this proposal does not in fact solve the problem of agricultural surpluses.
Vi mener, at det måske nok er muligt med andre løsninger, måske endog andre, som lettere ville blive accepteret af nogle, jeg tænker her især på adskillige medlemslande. Men selvfølgelig kan der ud over disse forslag endnu træffes andre foranstaltninger — og her tilslutter jeg mig endnu en gang hr. Arndt — til at undersøge og korrigere grundene til landbrugspolitikens fejlsjagne kurs med henblik på at sikre dens beståen.
That is a problem that is not to be solved in budget terms, and it is for that reason that we consider it essential that these proposals from the Commission must be accompanied by other, very much braver ones where agriculture is concerned : proposals, that is, that finally go to the roots of the surpluses problem.
Hvad angår det andet argument, som Kommissionen har fremført for at kræve en forhøjelse, nemlig den nødvendige stigning i de ikke-obligatoriske udgifter, er jeg sikker på, at medlemslandene vil stille sig tvivlende, på samme måde som vi vil stille os tvivlende.
What we must ask the Commission, on the other hand, is how, in the medium and longterm, will it be possible to achieve a Community budget in which the proportion devoted to agriculture is very much reduced : whether it is 33 %, or 35 %, or 40 %, I do not think is the fundamental issue.
Vi forlanger, at der skal være enighed regeringerne imellem; derefter bevilger vi de nødvendige midler.
In reality, it is instead essential that these proposals should be accompanied by others to deal with agriculture.
Men med hensyn til Kommissionens første mål — for at gentage det — er vi principielt enige.
First of all, the significance of this document lies in the fact that it seeks to present comprehensive propo sals.
Jeg vil, hr. formand, og kære kolleger, for at runde af gerne i få ord forelægge det beslutningsforslag, som den liberale gruppe har fremsat med henblik på Det europæiske Råd i Stuttgart. Faktisk består det i en veritabel appel, som vi beder Parlamentet om at rette til stats- og regeringscheferne.
We are well aware on all sides that several issues will have to be settled simultaneously, since otherwise the Community will be unable to find a way out of its present crisis, and the Commission's draft attempts to take account of the problems of all concerned, proposing what is in a sense a compromise.
Vi befinder oS i en alvorlig krisesituation, Kommissionens formand har nævnt det, og det er sandt.
Secondly, the Commission is proposing the removal of the ceiling for VAT.
Det er virkelig vanskeligt at forestille sig, at der over for den fare, som truer Fællesskabet, pludselig skulle indtræffe en gunstig udvikling ved det kommende europæiske topmøde.
However, we consider it essential — and I wish to stress this point, on which I am completely at one with Mr Arndt's words — that any additional resources should be assigned to the new policies for which Parliament has been calling persistently, and with good reason since these policies provide the key to balance between the Member States and their varied needs.
Vor beslutning tilsigter ikke at levere præcise løsninger på alle de problemer, som rejser sig, men snarere at betone de væsentligste spørgsmål for Europa.
To conclude these brief remarks, Mr President — and, as I was saying, whilst fully aware, as we are, of the dangers inherent in the proposal — we consider it a very important one and a good one, from many points of view, taken overall.
Med hensyn til det andet mål, altså det, som Kommissionen kalder genskabelsen af et afbalanceret budget, stiller vi os lidt mere forbeholdne.
Other mechanisms could no doubt be devised, but it has to be acknowledged that the system proposed by the Commission is coherent.
Vi gentager, at det er en dårlig formulering,, for budgettet er ikke ude af balance.
How often have we heard it said that Parliament has a tendency to be spendthrift because it has no responsibility for the revenue side of the budget ?
Det er ikke et EF-budget, det er fælles politikker, primært landbrugspolitikken, som det er nødvendigt at finansiere.
Mrs Scrivener (L). — (FR) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen the Community has reached a turningpoint in its history, since it is in fact faced with the prospect of being quite simply unable to meet its commitments in the immediately foreseeable future.
Eftersom der altså — desværre — kun er denne land brugspolitik, er det naturligt, at den selv tager broderparten af budgettet.
Last week in Brussels Mr Tugendhat gave us an outline of the budget for 1984, from which we could see for ourselves that the Community is virtually up to the ceiling of its own resources. So we are now faced
Det er ikke en manglende ligevægt i budgettet, det er en manglende ligevægt i vort Fællesskab, som ikke er i stand til at nå til enighed om de nødvendige fælles politikker.
Finally, the Commission's proposal for modulated VAT, based as it is on a series of indicators, has the merit of making for a better balance in Member
Det problem, som rejser sig, det eneste egentlige problem måske, er byrdefordelingen, hvilket fuld stændig adskiller sig fra en afbalancering af budgettet.
States' financial contributions, and this, whether one likes it or not, has become an obsession with our Governments.
Med hensyn til dette punkt kan vi medgive, at det på trods af de foranstaltninger, der er iværksat, er tilrådeligt at overveje tingene grundigt.
As far as the United Kingdom's contribution is concerned, the Commission's proposal offers the advantage of eliminating the need for ad hoc solutions such as those seen in recent years.
Og i betragtning af de beløb, som Kommissionen foreslår os, kan vi sige, at vi i det store og hele kan tilslutte os det finansielle omfang.
This system of VAT modulation nevertheless needs to be verified by statistical simulation, and this has yet to be done.
Det, der fremkalder visse forbehold fra vor side, er midlerne, og i særdeleshed de modulerede momsafgifter for landbruget.
At this stage, therefore, we are favourably disposed towards the proposals that have been laid before us ; we feel that other solutions may be possible, which would perhaps even be more readily acceptable to some people, and to a significant number of Member States in particular.
Kommissionen foreslår os således at lade producenternes med ansvar overgå til medlemslandene, hvilket medfører — denne gang for indtægternes vedkommende —, at en del af den fælles landbrugspolitik på ny gøres national.
These proposals apart, however, there is of course a need for further measures — and this is another point on which I agree with Mr Arndt — in order to identify and tackle the causes of deviations from the common agricultural policy, this in the interests of ensuring its very survival.
Det er mere alvorligt.
Why measured ?
Europa kan ikke overvinde den økonomiske krise, den alvorlige stagnation og inflation, hvis der ikke kommer et fællesskabsinitiativ.
This increase in resources is apparently necessary for the common agricultural policy ; it is necessary to ensure that this policy — which should have been improved, not reformed — can now be improved, but not by rejecting the financial constraint, which would be a very poor way of going about restoring order in this policy.
Dette fællesskabsinitiativ kan umuligt realiseres, hvis ikke andelen af Fællesskabets udgifter på det samlede interne produkt øges betydeligt.
However, we find that the danger represented by the ceiling has been somewhat exaggerated and that, bearing in mind world prices and — regrettably perhaps — the current weather conditions, we do not face the prospect of such excessively swollen agricultural surpluses as was feared at one stage.
Denne procent er idag uacceptabel lav, 0,7 %, og vi må bevæge os henimod over 2 % i de kommende år.
As for the second argument advanced by the Commission in support of removal of the ceiling, namely the necessary growth in non-compulsory expenditure, I am sure that the Member States will have their doubts, and the same is true of us.
Dette er nødvendigt ikke kun af hensyn til Fællesskabets funktion, men også af hensyn til vore folks økonomiske og sociale fremgang.
Be that as it may, for the future we reiterate what we have always said : we are willing to finance policies as long as the Governments have agreed on them beforehand.
Vi accepterer de økonomiske ofre, men vi er ikke rede til at sætte de resultater, der er opnået i Fælles skabet, over styr.
We are not prepared to give money in advance and then wait for the policies to materialize.
Med dette forslag er det Fællesskabets opnåede resultater, der drages i tvivl, og det kan vi ikke acceptere.
We expect to see agreement among the Governments, then we shall provide the necessary finance.
Vi accepterer de forskellige beregningsnøgler, over førsler på baggrund af bruttonationalproduktet eller en anden beregningsfaktor, for dette drager ikke den finansielle solidaritet i tvivl og implicerer hverken gennationalisering af landbruget eller medlemslandenes medansvar.
Nevertheless, I repeat that we are in principle in agree ment with this the first of the Commission's propo sals.
Jeg vil gerne bemærke, at nogle af de fundamentale forslag, som formanden, hr. Thorn og næstformanden, hr. Tugendhat fremlagde, muligvis falder sammen med Parlamentets synspunkter, som går i samme retning som den tidligere beslutning i 1981 efter hr. Spinellis forslag.
With your leave, I should like to close with a few words on the motion for a resolution tabled by the Liberal and Democratic Group with the forthcoming European Council meeting in Stuttgart in mind.
Når de resultater, der er opnået i Fællesskabet, drages i tvivl gennem den finansielle solidaritet, stiller vi os forbeholdne over for dette princip, så meget desto mere, som vi til gengæld for denne indirekte, men konkrete betvivien ikke ser noget europæisk initiativ til at råde bod på det, eftersom der intet er blevet sagt om fællesskabspræferencen, som dog burde betones på ny.
Our motion for a resolution does not seek to suggest specific solutions to each of the problems facing us, but rather to draw attention to those European issues which demand to be given priority.
Jeg vil dermed sige, at vi ændrer fordelingen af byrderne, hvilket vi i princippet accepterer, men til gengæld er der for eksempel intet blevet sagt om fællesskabspræferencen.
It in no way duplicates other motions concerned with the specific problem of own resources.
Dette betyder ikke, at der ikke eksisterer et problem vedørende landbrugsudgifterne.
This wording is, we repeat, inappropriate since the budget is not imbalanced.
Vi har konstateret det, og vi har fremhævet det gentagne gange i Europa-Parlamentet, men det kan ikke forenes med den fremgangsmåde, som Kommissionen foreslår.
It is not a Community budget, but common policies, essentially the agricultural policy, that we have to finance.
Først og fremmest er det umuligt, at der eksisterer et korrelativt forhold mellem deltagelsesprocenten af landbrugsproduktion i hver enkelt medlemsstat og den samlede produktion i Fælles skabet.
Since the agricultural policy is — unfortunately — all that we have, it is natural that it should account for the lion's share of the budget.
Dette er ikke sundt, det er ikke logisk, og jeg mener også, at det er kompliceret.
This is not an imbalance in the budget, but an imbalance in our Community, which is unable to reach agreement on the common policies that we need.
Derimod tror jeg, at det er muligt at fastholde, at udgiften for produkter, som findes i strukturelt overskud — deri ligger problemet — ikke kan blive ved med at vokse.
I should like to say in conclusion, that, as representatives elected by universal suffrage, we not only bear a responsibility towards the citizens of Europe to use all the energy and realism at our command to warn of the threat to the existence of the Community, but also have a duty to do what we can to avert it.
Tværtimod bør den begrænses. Der foreligger et problem med hensyn til de produkter, som findes inden for de strukturelle overskud, og derom bør vi samle vor opmærksomhed.
Mr de la Malène (DEP). — (FR) Mr President, Mr President of the Commission, ladies and gentlemen, in the draft decision that it has presented to the Council the Commission sets two objectives : an increase in the Community's own resources, and the elimination of imbalances in the budget.
Vi ved alle, at Europa har behov for frisk vind i sejlene.
We can accept that, despite the commitments entered into, there is cause for reflection on this point.
Vil dette forsøg give det frisk vind i sejlene?
On the basis of the figures proposed by the Commission, we can say that we would be in broad agreement with the overall volume of finance indicated.
Jeg vil ikke spille maksimalist, det ligger ikke til mit temperament, jeg har snarere det modsatte temperament, men vi tvivler med bekymring på karakteren af disse forslag.
It is on the subject of the methods of raising this finance, especially the VAT rate varying according to agricultural indicators, that we have reservations.
Vi er bange for — jeg belægger mine ord — at medlemslandenes ratifikationsprocedure netop på grund af forslagenes relative uligevægt og delvise utilstrækkelighed bliver noget langsommelig set i relation til det tilsigtede mål, som derfor risikerer ikke at blive nået.
The Commission is proposing a shift in the burden of coresponsibility from the pro ducers to the Member States, which is tantamount to renationalizing part of the common agricultural policy, this time on the revenue side.
Ud fra en anden synsvinkel er det ikke juridisk muligt at forbinde forøgelsen af Fællesskabets indtægter med indikatorer, som har forbindelse med landbrugsproduktion.
On the other hand we have much greater reservations about the procedure, about the removal of all limits on own resources subject only to authorization by the Council acting unanimously and Parliament acting by