natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det burde snarere være en en naturlig udvikling, der er nødvendig for dets fremtidige positive vækst.
At our meeting to be held on 22 September, in about ten days' time, we will study a communication presented by President Thorn concerning the enhancement of Community action in the cultural sector.
Jeg tilslutter mig derfor nødvendigheden af et direktiv på dette område.
As I said at the beginning of my speech, the dialogue begun today will be continued.
Det var rent faktisk dens baggrund for at medtage det noget klodsede afsnit III i forslaget.
Naturally, this document will be sent to Parliament.
Nu kan man måske mene, at det er lige så uheldigt at diskriminere mellem afhængige virksomheder, hvis herskende virksomhed er beliggende i Europa, og dem, der har hovedsæde i tredje lande.
The matter will certainly be referred to the competent Committee on Culture; this will be an opportunity to develop, in precise and concrete terms, some of the guidelines which should inspire us in our future activities.
Men vi må se realiteterne i øjnene; mens vi kan indføre et vandtæt system af rettigheder i Fælles skabet, kan vi ikke gennemtvinge vore bestemmelser uden for Fællesskabets grænser uden at kræve nøjagtig den slag eksterritorial jurisdiktion, som gør os så vrede, når det kræves af amerikanerne.
I should say that the communication I have just mentioned will provide a picture of what has been done and at the same time outline the Commission's plans for Community action in the cultural sector. This picture is still unfamiliar to many, but we have
De virkelige venner for direktivet og for de arbejdstagere, hvis rettigheder og værdighed vi ønsker at se sikret i en nedgangsperiode, vil være dem, der søger det opnåelige i stedet for at miste det hele på gulvet.
To some they are an indication of the conspiracy theory of history, to others they are merely a natural development of the global village.
Det er realiteternes barske vej og ikke uskyldens og den politiske retoriks lette sti.
It was perhaps inevitable that that other product of integration in the last 30 years, the Com munity, should seek to use its supranational jurisdiction to come to terms with its counterparts in the world of business, the multinationals.
Je mener endvidere, at når situationen kræver det, er Parlamentet i stand til at træffe sammenhængende, ligevægtige afgørelser. Dette er en sådan situation.
1-561/80 — COM (80) 423 final) for a directive on procedures for informing and con sulting the employees of undertakings with com plex structures, in particular transnational under takings.
Dette spørgsmål var i udvalget af så stor betydning, at jeg kort vil gøre rede for retsudvalgets overvejelser.
I suggest to you that this effort to do something about multinationals is worthwhile.
Direktivet er efter retsudvalgets mening fuldstændig uafhængigt af en virksomheds retsform. Det henholder sig ikke som det 5. direktiv til en bestemt selskabsform.
I do so as a Conservative, as a believer in the capitalist system and in the benefits which business activity and free trade have brought to the people of Europe.
For det andet betyder direktivet ikke noget indgreb i virksomhedernes struktur.
In the nine teenth century business operated without the national framework of company law which we now take for granted.
Hr. Richards har gentange gange understreget den betydning, han tillægger Parlamentets holdning til dette direktiv.
Mr Spencer, rapporteur. — Mr President, as you said, the directive is on procedures for informing and con sulting the employees of undertakings with complex structures, in particular transnational undertakings.
Vi vil gerne takke ham for denne kompliment til vor institution.
Not a simple title, but then this is not a simple matter.
Kære kolleger, Deres udvalg har arbejdet med dette direktiv i næsten to år.
It will apply to them, whether they have their headquarters within the Community or outside it.
Spørgsmålene er os alle bekendt.
It will apply to complex companies in one country.
Jeg glæder mig til forhandlingen og til Deres afgørelse.
Indeed it will apply at the limit to a company employing a couple of hundred people in two factories.
Formanden. — Hr. Vetter har ordet for retsudvalget og for den socialistiske gruppe.
I shall concentrate on the work of the Committee on Social Affairs and Employment.
Vetter, ordfører for udtalelsen. — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne præcisere, at jeg først taler på retsudvalgets vegne og i anden del af mit indlæg på den socialistiske gruppes vegne.
I shall leave to Mr Vetter the task of explaining the Legal Affairs Committee's amendments, which substantially weaken the directive, and to Mr von Bismarck I shall leave the no doubt equally con genial task of expounding the proposals of the Com mittee on Economic and Monetary Affairs for strengthening the directive.
Endelig understreger retsudvalget også berettigelsen af en henvisning til artikel 117 i EØF-traktaten, i hvilken Fællesskabet er forpligtet til sociale frem skridt.
It seeks to advance employee involvement by providing information and a degree of consultation on matters which touch upon the interests of most Europeans at their place of work.
Kommissionen er i øvrigt efterkommet retsudvalgets opfordring til endnu en gang udførligt at gøre rede for sit standpunkt, hvad retsgrundlag angår, ved at forelægge en skriftlig udtalelse.
The Commission has justified its work in this field by reference to the distortion of competition which may flow from differences in the degree of workers' involvement between different countries.
Og endelig går retsudvalget ind for, at alle ordninger, der influerer på forholdet
On Article 5 my col leagues accepted that the general information required could be adequately communicated annually.
Diskussionen i retsudvalget gik i sin udførlighed og grundighed langt ud over det, vi er vant til, når vi udarbejder udtalelser. Det viser, hvor stor betydning Kommissionens forslag til dette direktiv spiller i parlamentsmedlemmernes bevidsthed.
The committee did, how ever, introduce the concept of information given about geographic groupings of subsidiaries.
Tillad mig at redegøre for og begrunde de punkter i udtalelsen, som retsudvalget har tillagt særlig betydning. ning.
In Article 5 the committee has clarified the timing provisions, but in Article 6 it has perpetrated some-
Eu ropa-Pari am en tets forhandlinger
Debates of the European Parliament
Vetter arbejdstager-arbejdsgiver, skal udformes således, at de har den størst mulige praktiske anvendelighed.
Spencer believe further that when occasion demands, this Parliament is capable of coherent balanced decisions.
Retsudvalgets drøftelser uiste imidlerlid også, at målet i kommissionsforslaget bortsat fra ændringsøniskerne, naturligvis principielt bifaldes.
thing of an illogicality by leaving in the Commission's requirement that information on a decision be sent automatically to all subsidiaries within the Community rather than only to those directly affected.
Jeg vil ikke lægge skjul på, at netop denne formulering i den udtalelse, som jeg skal afgive på retsudvalgets vegne, er et væsentligt fremskridt, der kunne opnås gennem en løbende og tillidsfuld diskussion.
At the same time, in its infinite wisdom, it has retained the second paragraph of an amendment that I suggested, that would have required interested subsidiaries to opt in only if they deemed themselves to be affected.
Men den endelige afgørelse forbliver i sidste ende hos virksomhedsledelsen.
A smaller illogicality is the inclusion of new technologies in the lists in Article 5 but not in Article 6.
Lad mig nu i andel del af mit indlæg på den socialistiske gruppes vegne fremsætte nogle principielle betragtninger til hensigten med og indholdet af direktivet, der i de seneste måneder er blevet drøftet meget engageret af os alle sammen.
Commissioner Richard has repeatedly stressed the importance which he attaches to Parliament's views on this directive.
Det europæiske Fælles skab må, hvis det vil bestå, leve op til sin opgave og realisere et socialt fællesskab for sine medlemmer.
Well, we thank him for that constitutional compliment.
Den politiske og økonomiske udvikling i den sidste tid understreger ganske tydeligt, at det er bittert nødvendigt at lade dette fællesskab udvikle sig til et solidarisk forbund af stater, regioner og nationer.
Indeed, I know that I can speak for all the groups in this House in asserting that whatever the detailed outcome of Tuesday's vote, we shall expect Parliament's amendments to be incorporated by the Commission.
Dertil hører ikke mindst harmoniseringen af de sociale rettigheder i vore lande på et højt og avanceret stade og udviklingen af sociale rettigheder, der svarer til Fællesskabets internationale karakter.
Should the Commission refuse to accept our amendments, I now give notice that it is my intention, as rapporteur, to ask for Parliament's sup port in exercising those prerogatives given us by the Court in the isoglucose judgment which are now incorporated in our Rules.
Ud fra dette synspunkter bør vi også bedømme det direktiv, vi skal tage stilling til i dag og i morgen.
In Article 8, the widely-disliked reference to the largest employer of labour in the Community has been deleted in favour of leaving responsibility with the subsidiary management concerned.
Dets virkeliggørelse ville, som det hedder i den betænkning, hr. Spencer har udarbejdet for udvalget om sociale anliggender og beskæftigelse, være et helt afgørende skridt på vejen til et socialt Europa, for kun en europæisk retsramme kan garantere, at arbejdstagerrettighederne bliver effektive over for koncerner, der har organiseret sig ud over nationale grænser.
That leaves us with the vexed question of extraterritoriality and what has become known as 'the bypass' — the putative right of access to the ultimate decision-taker, even where that lies outside the Community's jurisdiction.
Arbejdstagernes ret til information og høring anser vi for selvfølgelig. Men naturligvis er den måde, hvorpå vore tanker er virkeliggjort i dette direktiv, på ingen made tilstrækkelig for den socialistiske gruppe. Det ville være hykleri at lægge skjul på dette.
Colleagues, your committees have worked on this directive for nearly two years.
Vi hengiver os dog ikke til illusioner, vi ved også, at det næppe vil være muligt at gennemføre mere vidtgående arbejdstagerrettigheder i Det europæiske Fællesskab, som det er nu, og på dette tidspunkt.
The Commission has rightly stressed that it does not wish to discriminate between multinational companies and uninational companies. That indeed was its rationale for introducing the somewhat cumbersome Section III into the draft.
Dette direktiv er et lille, men yderst vigtigt fremskridt, det er nemlig et vejmærke, det angiver den retning, Fællesskabet må bevæge sig i, hvis det vil være mere end blot et forbi gående nødfællesskab.
Now it might be felt that it would be equally invidious to discriminate between subsidiaries whose dominant undertakings were in Europe and those headquartered in third countries.
Ingen skal tro, at dybtgående ændringer i industri og erhvervstiv, der berører os alle, kan imødegås uden social enighed, og at det er muligt i nedgangstider sammen med arbejdstagerne at komme til en slags »makro-enighed« på højere plan, hvis der ikke på virksomhedsplan i det mindste findes noget i retning af »mikro-enighed«.
We really must face the reality of the situation, that while we could erect a watertight system of rights within the Community, we cannot enforce our writ beyond the boundaries of the Community without claiming exactly the kind of extraterritorial jurisdiction which so infuriates us when claimed by the Americans. icans.
Struktur ændringen frembyder den store chance for at indrømme arbejdstagerne den rolle, de må indtage, hvis vort sociale og politiske system skal udvikles videre.
Mr Vetter, draftsman of an opinion. — (DE) Mr President, I should like to make it clear that I shall be speaking on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee to begin with and of the Socialist Group in the latter part of my speech.
Derfor er det kun et spørgsmål om social forståelse at indrømme dem de enkleste rettigheder, vort samfundsstem kan byde, nemlig retten til information og høring.
Ladies and gentlemen, the discussion in the Legal Affairs Committee was far more detailed and thorough than is usual when opinions are drawn up.
I den offentlige diskussion er der udtalt frygt for, at arbejdstagerne ikke vil omgås ansvarligt med de informationer, de modtager.
This shows how immensely important the Members of the European Parliament consider the Commission's proposal for this directive to be.
Jeg spørger mig selv: Hvilken menneskeopfattelse skjuler sig egentlig bag denne så fornemt formulerede mistænkeliggørelse?
Allow me to refer to and explain the points of the opinion to which the Legal Affairs Committee attaches particular importance.
Faktoren arbejde er efter vores overbevisning et lige berettiget element i erhverslivek.
Our discussion focused on whether or not the legal basis chosen by the Commission is legitimate.
Først den bringer kapitalen gevinst, og de, der råder over ejendom, har mere magt end arbejdstagerne.
This was in no way purely a debate on legal theory, however.
De har også magt over arbejdstagere.
The answer to this question also has great practical significance.
Det ved vi, og derfor siger vi: Den, der vil skabe et retfærdigt samfund, må hjælpe arbejds tagerne til deres rettigheder og kæmpe med dem for disse rettigheder.
The basic question is: does this directive relate to company law and so affect the legal structure of companies, or does it relate to labour law, the legal basis then being the directive on mass dismissals and the maintenance of workers' rights when they change from one employer, firm or part of a firm to another?
Denne påstand er for længst gendrevet, direktivets normer gælder nemlig for de virksom heder, der er hjemmehørende i Fællesskabet. Men
I remain convinced that, scattered amongst the 284 amendments which confront colleagues, there lies a workable, practical — one might even say elegant — amended version of the Vredeling proposal.
Ved vedtagelsen af dette direktiv drejer det sig altså om intet andet end at gennemfire social fornuft; men det drejer sig også om at udvikle normer i Det euro pæiske Fællesskab, der bidrager til at overvinde modsætningen mellem begrænsningen af nationale rettigheder på den ene side og den internationale
After it had discussed this point at length, questioned the Commission's representatives several times and considered an opinion prepared by Parliament's research service, the Legal Affairs Committee con cluded that Article 100 of the EEC Treaty must be
Vetter økonomiske virksomhed på virksomhedsplan på den anden.
Vetter applied in conjunction with Article 117 of the EEC Treaty.
repræsenterer, befinder sig.
What is at stake?
Virksomhederne er nu en gang det sted, hvor velstanden bliver produceret, hvor arbejdstagere bliver arbejdsløse eller finder arbejde.
Everywhere they have been, these critics have painted a distorted picture of this directive, a picture that in no way corresponds to the facts.
Som følge deraf er spørgsmålet om, hvordan vore love influerer på virksomhedernes kvalitet samt på deres evne til at producerer nye produkter og blive konkurrencedygtige, af største betydning.
This Parliament would do well to consider what the directive proposes and not to allow itself to be pressurized by lobbies which, to put it very mildly, are using very unusual methods in their attempts . ..
I begrundelsen til direktivet findes der ikke et ord om dette emne, og i virkeligheden er dette en sag, der er i konflikt med informationsbehovet og det, vi i Tysk land kalder socialplaner.
The Legal Affairs Committee also emphasizes the justification of a reference to Article 117 of the EEC Treaty, in which the Community undertakes to achieve social progress.
Det behøver ikke at være en konflikt, hvis man gør det fornuftigt, men det blev der ikke taget nok hensyn til i begyndelsen.
A majority of the committee's members criticized various aspects of the Commission's proposal, and their reservations find expression in numerous proposals for amendments to the Commission's text and in the com mittee's written opinion.
de Courcy Ling. — (EN) Hr. formand, på baggrund af Deres meddelelse om, at hr. Vetter ville tale både som den socialistiske gruppes talsmand og for retsudvalget besluttede jeg mig til ikke at tage ordet til forretningsordenen, før han talte, fordi jeg ville se, om han adskilte disse to roller.
The Legal Affairs Committee was particularly con cerned about the danger of a group of undertakings located in one Member State of the Community being treated differently from a conglomerate with head quarters in a country outside the Community. And the committee also advocates that any arrangement affect ing relations between employers and employees should be as practical as possible.
Det var jeg bange for, at han ikke ville, og mine værste frygt blev bekræftet.
... to influence opinion-forming in the European Parliament.
Jeg mener ikke, at talsmænd for politiske grupper bør tale på retsudvalgets vegne samtidig.
It is claimed, for example, that the directive would have legal repercussions beyond the Com munity's frontiers, that it has extraterritorial implications.
Jeg vil gerne på min gruppes vegne forbeholde mig vore egne retsudvalgsmedlemmers stilling.
This claim has long since been refuted, since the standards laid down in the directive apply to undertakings located in the Community.
Jeg beklager, at retsudvalgets formand ikke selv er til stede, men jeg er meget overrasket over, at disse to holdninger var så sammenblandede.
But what extraterritorial implications really are has been demonstrated to us in a not very friendly way by the United States Administration in connection with other areas of European trade relations.
Jeg vil gerne som en erfaring af denne forhandling fremsætte en anden lovmaksime for Dem alle.
In its deliberations the Legal Affairs Committee also concluded, however, that, provided the requested amendments are made, the aim of the Commission's proposal should in principle be welcomed.
Ingen lovgiver burde i betragtning af den uhyre strøm af love, som enhver borger skal være opmærksom på, lave en lov eller medvirke hertil, uden at den virkelig er nødvendig.
I will not conceal the fact that this wording in the opinion I am presenting on the Legal Affairs Committee's behalf represents considerable progress, achieved in a discussion that was to the point and inspired confidence.
Dermed mener jeg ikke selve sagen, men størrelsen af de virksomheder, der her er inddraget.
All the directive seeks to do is to ensure that workers are informed in good time of proposed decisions and
Først i dag til middag var det muligt for mig at få de tyske forslag, 80 i alt.
I would like, on behalf of my group, to reserve the position of our own members of the Legal Affairs Committee.
Peters. — (DE) Jeg konstaterer udtrykkeligt, at hr. Vetter har opdelt sin udtalelse meget klart.
Mr Peters. — (DE) Mr President, I took particular note of the fact that Mr Vetter did indeed divide his opinion into two parts.
Han har på retsudvalgets vegne nøjagtigt gjort rede for, hvad retsudvalget har besluttet, og han har særskilt frem ført den socialistiske gruppes opfattelse.
Speaking on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee, he set out clearly the conclusions arrived at in that committee, whereas he con veyed the views of the Socialist Group separately.
Formanden. — Jeg beklager, dette er ikke et indlag til forretningsordenen.
President. — I am sorry, that is not a point of order.
Økonomi- og valutaudvalget har ordet.
I call the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs.
Jeg må sige Dem ganske ærligt: Når der skal være tale om omhyggelig lovgivning, er det en umulig fremgangsmåde.
But the achievement of our aims in this directive is not, of course, enough for the Socialist Group. It would be hypocritical to conceal that here.
Derfor foreslår jeg endnu en gang, at vi i fællesskab tager op til overvejelse, om vi dog ikke gør klogt i at føre denne forhandling til ende med al omhu og al klarhed, måske også skarphed, og at udsætte afstemningen — kun afstemningen — til oktober, ikke for at forsinke sagen, men for at lave en bedre lov.
But we are under no illusions: we know that there is little chance of work ers being granted more extensive rights in this European Community and at this time. This directive is a small but particularly important step forward, because it is a signpost, it indicates the direction in which the Community must move if it wants to be more than a temporary association of countries which will help eacb other in emergencies.
Der er en masse kontreversielle ting i disse 286 forslag, som der ikke er nogen, der virkelig kan over skue i morgen.
Struc tural change provides a great opportunity to allow the workers to play the part they must play if our social and political order is to be developed further.
Hvis tilfældet vil, kan rækkefølgen nemt føre til, at forslagene modsiger hinanden.
The only conclusion to be drawn from an appreciation of the social facts, therefore, is that they must be granted the simplest rights our social order has to offer, the rights to be informed and to be consulted.
Jeg synes ikke, at det er en fornunftig vej, og jeg vil bede alle om endnu en gang at sove på det.
I ask myself, what image do those who harbour this politely worded suspicion actually have of the worker?
Formanden. — Hr. von Bismarck har anmodet om afstemning nu.
We are convinced that labour has equal rights in the economy.
Den kan ikke finde sted nu.
They also have power over workers.
Spørgsmålet kan drøftes i morgen. Hr. Albers har ordet til forretningsordenen.
We are aware of this, and that is why we say: those who want to shape this society properly must help workers to enjoy their rights and join them in their fight for those rights.
von Bismarck, ordfører for udtalelsen. — (DE) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer!
The adoption of this directive thus amounts to nothing other than the acceptance of social reason.
I økonomi- og valutaudvalget var der ingen tvivl om, at det her drejer sig om at realisere et af den sociale markedsokonomis fundamentalt mål, hvilked vi jo er forpligtet til i henhold til vor traktat: information og dermed også motivation og naturligvis — som i artikel 6 — retten til at diskutere de konsekvenser, en ændring i stor skala fører med sig.
Mr von Bismarck, draftsman of an opinion. — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, there was no doubt in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs that this directive represents the achieve ment of a fundamental goal of the social market econ omy, to which we are, of course, committed by our Treaties: information and thus motivation and, of course, as Article 6 provides, the right to discuss the implications of a major change.
Hvad der i udvalget blev rejst indsigelse mod, var vejen.
What the committee complained about was the way in which this was done.
Hvad der i virkeligheden er sket, er jo, at man har taget den tyske lov om interne wirksomhedsforhold og delvis har afskrevet paragraf 106.
What actually happened was that the German Constitution of Enterprises Act was taken and part of Section 106 copied out.
Rækkefølgen er noget ændret — i øvrigt genfinder jeg alle punkterne.
The order was changed slightly, but otherwise all the points are there.
En tilsvarende frem gangsmåde ville det være, hvis man, når man skulle bygge en bil, ville tage værket ud af et ur og bygge det ind i et karrosseri. Følgen ville være, at ingen af delene fungerer.
It is as if someone wanting to build a car took the works from a clock and put them in a car body.
Den egentlige grund til de mange ændringsforslag er, at man har gjort sagen halvt.
The real reason for the very many amendments that have been tabled is that the directive only goes halfway.
Tavshedspligt, medansvar, partnerskab, tendensbeskyttelse, fredspligt, der alle findes i den nævnte tyske lov, har man nemlig udeladt.
Secrecy, co-responsibility, part nership, the protection of understandings run by the church, media and so on, the obligation to keep the peace, all to be found in the German Constitution of Enterprises Act, have been omitted from this directive.