natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Derfor beder jeg Kommissionen om at undersøge dette forslag meget omhyggeligt.
As I have said earlier, we will support them.
Moorhouse (ED). — (EN) Jeg vil støtte Klinkenborg-betænkningen.
Mrs Ewing (DEP). — Mr President, when one is attacked, I think one should be entitled to defend oneself.
Har han ikke hørt om M25, der lige er blevet forbundet?
Well, let me just say to him.
Det er nu muligt for tunge lastvogne at køre ret ubesværet ned langs Englands østkyst, tværs over M25 og ned til Kent, takket være fru Thatcher.
He can go to anyone in the Highlands and Islands, even to his own supporters, and no one will say that I do not serve the interests of my constituency.
Det er meningen med det hele.
Explanations of vote
Antoniozzi (PPE). — (IT) Jeg skal meddele, at jeg vil stemme for beslutningsforslaget om foranstaltninger til fordel for transportinfrastrukturen i Europa, hvis ordfører er hr. Klinkenborg.
The Community interest of this project has been demonstrated with facts and on the basis of a very careful and detailed on-the-spot examination, which shows how wrong are the conclusions reached by the Commission on the basis of superficial, unreliable appraisals. sals.
I dokumentet gøres der rede for en fuldstændig og sammenhængende problemkreds, som vi er overbevist om er egnet til at løse de alvorlige problemer, der vedrører de fundamentale trafikforbindelser inden for Europa.
The Commission must therefore revise its negative view regarding the question of the Straits of Messina and give direct help first to the preparation of the project and then to its execution.
Jeg foreslår, at man prioriterer de problemer, der er mest omfattende, og som kan gennemføres med tilstrækkelig finansiel støtte.
We have to overcome not only the inertia and delays of the Italian Government, but also the undervaluation and inattention of the Commission.
Blandt disse findes der i Sydeuropa det vigtige problem vedrørende »broen« mellem kontinentet og Sicilien ved hjælp af den faste forbindelse med Calabria; denne infrastruktur kan medføre yderligere udvikling af økonomisk og social karakter udover at løse problemet med en mere umiddelbar kontakt mellem forskellige områder, som også bidrager til, at de europæiske folk tilnærmes hinanden.
These two obstacles must be removed ; the Klinkenborg report is only a first step — but a very important one — in the right direction, and we Italian Communists will therefore support it.
Prout (ED). —r (EN) I kølvandet af den nylige lastbilchaufførblokade i Frankrig er der fulgt en yderst forvirret finansiel situation.
Furthermore, there are huge tracts of motorway that have not been joined up properly in Kent East.
Den opgave, forsikringsbranchen er blevet stillet overfor i forbindelse med behandlingen af disse krav, er formidabel, navnlig med hensyn til fortolkningen af CMR-konventionen.
I am delighted too that Paragraph 24 of the resolution asks for a careful evaluation of the Channel Tunnel, because it is certainly true — and I must warn the Commissioner of this — that it is quite possible that if the Channel Tunnel comes out near Folkestone, it will have very serious effects indeed upon Dover.
Desuden vil det i mange tilfælde være yderst vanskeligt at bevise årsagen til tabet.
Therefore I ask the Commission to examine this proposal very carefully indeed.
Hvis hindringerne ikke fandtes, ville tvisten ikke være opstået.
Has he not heard of the M25 which has just been connected ?
Alle Fællesskabets regeringer skal derfor bære noget af ansvaret for forsinkelserne.
It is now possible for heavy lorries to travel quite freely down the east coast of England, across the M25 and down to Kent, thanks to Mrs Thatcher.
Jeg henstiller indtrængende til Rådet at trafikministre at vedkende sig dette ansvar, at gøre erstatningsordninger lettere og rimeligere og at handle hurtigt for at fjerne de faktiske årsager til tvisten.
We have had enormous frustrations, of course, as he will appreciate, in the Committee on Transport in furthering this cause, but he has been one who sees quite clearly that the development of a common transport policy is at the heart of European recovery. That is
Romualdi (NI). — (IT) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne på det italienske højres vegne sige, at vi vil stemme for denne udmærkede betænkning fra hr. Klinkenborg om infrastrukturerne — Messina-strædet, motorvejskrydset Modena-Pistoia, tunnelen under Kanalen, kanalen mellem Milano og Adriaterhavet og andre — som er nødvendige for at forbedre de virkelig dårlige betingelser, som transporten inden for Fællesskabet har udviklet sig under, og som bogstavelig talt er blokeret af flaskehalse på vejene, søvejene og i luften, for slet ikke at tale om flaskehalse inden for toldvæsenet, hvor man synes helt og holdent at ville genindføre i moderne forklædning de strukturer, metoder og afgifter, der hidrører fra den mørkeste middelalder.
Mr Romualdi (NI). — (IT) Mr President, I should like to say on behalf of the members of the Italian political right, that we shall be voting in favour of this excellent Klinkenborg report on the infrastructures — such as, for example, the Straits of Messina, the Modena-Pistoia motorway, the Channel Tunnel or the waterway linking Milan with the Adriatic, and so on — that are necessary in order to improve the truly sad conditions under which transport operates within our Community — now blocked quite literally by bottlenecks on the roads, at sea and in the air as well as customs bottlenecks — which, taken all together, seem like a repetition in modern terms of the structures, methods and taxes of the Middle Ages at their worst.
Vi ønsker et forenet Europa, men vi foretager os intet for at forene det materielt ved hjælp af kommunikationsveje, som virkelig fortjener navnet, beregnet til at sikre den frie bevægelighed for varer og mennesker, som traktaten vil, og som er ønsket og måske stadig væk ønskes af vore vælgere, der uden tvivl er de mest seriøse og åbne europæere af alle og de eneste, vi stadig kan regne med — i det mindste håber vi det — og af denne enighed skal vi hente styrken til effektivt at opnå fremskridt henimod enhed og henimod en moderne verden.
We want a united Europe, but we are doing nothing to unite it, at least materially, through means of communication that really are such in fact as well as in name, and that serve the free movement of goods and people, as the Treaty says, and as was the hope — and perhaps still is — of our electors, who are undoubtedly the most sincere and open supporters of the European ideal, the only ones on whom we can still count — at least so we hope — and from whose agreement we can derive the strength to progress effectively towards unity and a modern world.
Forhandlinger i Europa-Parlamentet fremkommer som tillæg til De Europæiske Fælles skabers Tidende og omfatter:
Debates of lhe European Parliament, published as an annex to the Official Journal of the European Communities, comprise:
KONTORET FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABERS OFFICIELLE PUBLIKATIONER
Catalogue number : AX-AA-83-015-EN-C
Fuldstændigt referat af møderne fra den 13. til den 16. marts 1984
1984-1985 Session Report of Proceedings from 13 to 16 March 1984
Mødet tirsdag den 13. marts 1984
Sitting of Tuesday, 13 March 1984
Mødet onsdag den 14. marts 1984
Sitting of Wednesday, 14 March 1984
Mødet torsdag den 15. marts 1984
Sitting of Thursday, 15 March 1984
Mødet fredag den 16. marts 1984
Sitting of Friday, 16 March 1984
MØDET TIRSDAG DEN 13. MARTS 1984
SITTING OF TUESDAY, 13 MARCH 1984
Spørgsmål til Kommissionen:
Mr Luster; Mr Beumer; Mr Sieglerschmidt; Mr Pflimlin ; Mr Tyrrell; Mr Chambeiron ; Mr Galland ; Mr Curry ; Mr de la Malene
1-1358/83) af Squarcialupi: lupi:
1-1358/83) by Mrs Squarcia- lupi
Spørgsmål nr. 5 af Berkhouwer: Cigaretter i Frankrig:
— Question No 4, by Mr Balfe : Doorstep milk delivery:
Universitetssamarbejde i EF. — Anerkendelse af eksamensbeviser. — Betænkninger (dok.
University cooperation in the Community — Recognition of diplomas — Reports (Doc.
1-1351/83) af Pery og (dok. 1-1354/83) af Schwencke:
1-1351/83) by Mrs Péry and (Doc.
Spørgsmål nr. 10 af sir Fred Warner: Fjernelse af mælkeoverskuddet i Fællesskabet:
No 7, by Mrs Weber: Reduction in pollution caused by emissions of motor vehicles :
Kommissionens udtalelser:
Action taken by the Commission opinions of Parliament
Frit valg af undervisning i EF (fortsættelse):
Freedom of education in the EEC (continuation) ation)
1-1413/83) af Eisma:
1-1413/83) by Mr Eisma
Spørgsmål nr. 13 af Lomas: Europæiske virksomheder i Sydafrika:
Question No 11, by Mrs Lizin : Early retirement in the Liège iron and steel industry :
Formanden. — I overensstemmelse med artikel 9, stk. 2, i forretningsordenen erklærer jeg Europa-Parlamentets session 1984-1985 for åbnet.
President. — Pursuant to Rule 9 (2) of the Rules of Procedure, I declare the 1984/85 session of the European Parliament open.
Jeg minder imidlertid om, at en sådan anmodning ikke er nok, og at den skal støttes af mindst ti medlemmer.
Mr Ligios tabled a motion to remove it from the agenda, saying it would be expedient to discuss both his and the Hopper report at the same time.
Jeg beder derfor de medlemmer, der ønsker konstatering af beslutningsdygtigheden, om at rejse sig.
They were not identical, but dealt in part with the same subject.
(Mere end ti medlemmer rejste sig — Efter optællingen konstaterede formanden, at Parlamentet ikke var beslut ningsdygtigt)
At the time, my group supported his proposal and the Hopper report was removed from the agenda.
Bombard (S). — (FR) Hr. formand, jeg er i protokollen ikke noteret som tilstedeværende; men jeg var her i går, og jeg deltog i øvrigt i afstemningen ved navn om Scrivener-betænkningen.
Mr Bombard (S). — (FR) Mr President, the minutes do not record that I was present.
• Vi tager denne bemærkning ad
I was, in fact, here yesterday.
(Protokollen godkendtes) (')
(Parliament approved the minutes).
(') Afgørelse om uopsættelig forhandling — Aktuel og uopsættelig debat (Bekendtgørelse) : se protokollen.
Then, when the Hopper report and the Ligios report appeared together on the agenda at the last part-session, a motion was tabled to remove the Hopper report.
Det er første gang, den liberale gruppe anmoder om konstatering af beslutningsdygtigheden.
I and my group consider this to be unfair ; this is no way to conduct our business.
Men i dette specielle tilfælde er det den eneste metode, der sikrer, at der bliver genetableret en vis fairness, som er ødelagt af hr. Ligios.
We do not oppose the Ligios report, we have simply ensured that both reports appear on the same agenda, which I feel is right and proper.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok.
President. — The next item is the continuation of the vote on the report (Doc.
1-1390/83) af Price for udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender om ændring af forretningsordenen, for så vidt angår proceduren for behandling og vedtagelse af afgørelser om decharge for Kommissionens forvaltning af det almindelige budget.
1-1374/83) by Mr Ligios.3
Det er en af Parlamentets vigtigste beføjelser, men i øjeblikket er vor forretningsorden utilstrækkelig, fordi den ikke dækker forskelige forhold og situationer, der kunne opstå.
We should be going on to vote on Amendment No 1 by Mrs Castle on Recital A, but I have a request from Mr Bangemann, on behalf of the Liberal and Democratic Group, that a quorum be established.
Derpå støttede min gruppe hans anmodning, og Hopper-betænkningen blev taget af dagsordenen.
I would therefore ask all Members who want a quorum established to rise.
Betydningen af denne beføjelse består i højere grad i at nægte end at meddele decharge. Det understregede det kompetente medlem af Kommissionen, Christopher Tugendhat, for adskillige år siden.
Mr Ligios (PPE), rapporteur. — (IT) Mr President, I am told that this is the first time that the Liberal Group has asked for such a procedure.
Men da så i sidste mødeperiode Hopper-betænkningen stod på dagsordenen sammen med Ligiosbetænkningen, kom der en anmodning om at tage Hopper-betænkningen af. Hr. Ligios erklærede i det pågældende møde, at det kunne man uden videre gøre, Hopper-betænkningen kunne også behandles senere.
If we followed this practice, as was done last time by the Conservatives and is now being done by Mr Bangemann, we should certainly not get very far in this Parliament, because on Fridays — as we have seen on a number of occasions — there is almost always not a quorum.
I sin udtalelse den 7. juli 1977 sagde hr. Tugendhat: »Et sådant afslag ville derfor være særdeles alvorligt.« Kommissionen ville jo — efter en sådan kritik — skulle nybesættes.
(More than 10 Members rose — Having made a check, the President announced that the House was not quorate).
Jeg afviser derfor den beskyldning for manglende fairness, som hr. Bangemann har rettet mod mig.
I therefore reject Mr Bangemann's accusation of disloyalty on my part.
Jeg er ikke medlem af økonomi- og valutaudvalget, men jeg må sige, at hr. Hoppers forslag til beslutning angående et problem, som Parlamentet har diskuteret i årevis, siden 1978, og som for tiden er til behandling ¡ Rådet, var af en sådan art, at det ville bringe forvirring i hele det arbejde, der hidtil er udført.
I am not a member of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, but I must say that the Hopper motion for a resolution, on a problem that this Parliament has been discussing for years, from 1978 onwards, and which at this moment is being studied by the Council, was such as to blow sky-high all the work that has been done so far.
Hertil kommer yderligere, at vi, når vi styrker Parlamentets beføjelser til at nægte at give decharge ikke absolut skal sige, at det nødvendigvis altid er en
Decision on urgent procedure — Topical and urgent debate (announcement) : see the Minutes of this sitting. See Annex I. See Debates of 16 and 17 February 1984.
Vi kan ikke acceptere denne tanke, først og fremmest fordi decharge proceduren såvel omfatter en bogholderimæssig kontrol i form af en godkendelse som en politisk bedømmelse af budget nr. 1 eller nr. 2.
Yet I do accept the need for figures to be fixed and I would point out that, in refusing a discharge, Parliament could include in such a refusal a fixing of the figures. In any event the figures would be fixed by a combination of the discharges for the preceding and succeeding years.
Det står altid åbent for Parlamentet at vende tilbage til sagen og på et senere tidspunkt give decharge, når man finder omstændighederne i orden eller mener, det er politisk ønskeligt.
It is always open to Parliament to go back to the matter and at some later date, when it is satisfied with the situation or if it considers it politically desirable, to grant a discharge at that time.
Medlem af Kommissionen, hr. Tugendhat, tog også i sin tale dengang helt klart stilling,, idet han sagde, at det at nægte at give decharge kun kan fortolkes på to måder: enten er afgørelsen om decharge udsat, eller man har ganske simpelt nægtet at give decharge.
That clearly was also considered by Commissioner Tugendhat in the same speech in which he said that refusal to grant discharge can be interpreted in only two ways : either discharge has been postponed or discharge is purely and simply refused. I do not think we need to go beyond that.
Jeg tror ikke, vi behøver at uddybe det yderligere.
President. — The next item is the report (Doc.
Det er, hr. formand, ensbetydende med, at dersom den politiske bedømmelse ikke er korrekt, at dersom de af budgetmyndigheden — Råd og Parlament — ønskede mål ikke er nået, så skal man drage læren deraf og delagtiggøre udvalgene deri med henblik på udarbejdelse af budget nr. 1.
Mr Price (ED), rapporteur. — Mr President, the European Parliament is the body responsible for granting a discharge to the Commission. This is one of Parliament's most important powers, yet our Rules at the moment are inadequate because they do not cover various matters and situations that could arise.
Forslaget om at ændre forretningsordenen, som Parlamentet nu har til behandling, går ud på at erstatte artikel 52, den korte artikel, vi på nuværende tidspunkt har i vor forretningsorden.
The proposal for a rule change now before the House seeks to replace Rule 52, the short rule currently contained in our rule book.
Artiklen skal ikke længere indeholde procedurens substans, men blot en bemyndigelse til at forretningsordenen vedføjes et bilag, der nu samtidig forelægges forsamlingen.
This rule would no longer contain the substance of the procedure but simply authorization for an annex, and the annex is also now proposed to the House.
Det vil derfor ville få, er noget, der i høj grad ligner bestemmelserne om vedtagelsen af de årlige budget.
Therefore, what we would have is something very similar to the rules governing the adoption of the annual budget.
Den måde, hvorpå dechargeproceduren forløber, ville blive indeholdt i forretningsordenen på lignende vis.
The form of procedure for discharge would be contained in our Rules in a similar way.
Vi konstaterer i øvrigt, at nægtelse af decharge kan forklares som en politisk vilje, der ikke er respekteret, og hvorfra stammer denne politiske vilje?
The importance of the power stems from the possibility of refusal rather than from the grant of discharge.
Nægtelse af decharge som sådan hverken kan eller må derfor sammenlignes med et mistillidsvotum.
This was underlined by the Commissioner responsible, Commissioner Tugendhat, several years ago.
Vi mener for vort vedkommende, at nægtelse af decharge reelt kan bruges som analyse under udarbejdelsen af kommende budgetter gennem en politisk vurdering og eventuelt medføre et mistillidsvotum. Men decharge bør helt adskilles fra mistillidsvotum.
In his statement of 7 July 1977 Mr Tugendhat said : 'Such a refusal would hence be extremely serious.
Jeg tror, at det er opfattelsen ikke blot blandt de jurister, der skal drøfte dette spørgsmål, og som vi for øvrigt for nyligt hørte i Bruxelles, men formentlig også hos Kommissionen.
In other words, he was saying at that time — and all of us have accepted this for many years now — that if the discharge were refused, the normal consequence would be that the Commission would have to resign.
Det forekommer mig at være i bedre overensstemmelse med både ånden i og den retlige ramme om vore institutioner, hvilket den socialistiske gruppe ønsker at præcisere.
The second reason why it is important is that when granting a discharge the European Parliament can append to its discharge decision comments which, under Article 85 of the Financial Regulation, the institutions have to implement.
Det er for øvrigt af denne grund, at hr. Sieglerschmidt på gruppens vegne har stillet et ændringsforslag, der indebærer nærmere præcisioner og muligheden af et mistillidsvotum.
Overall the importance of the power is that it is the European Parliament which grants discharge, not the Council of Ministers.
Men de to ting må ikke kædes sammen. De to metoder er ikke sammenlignelige.
There are very few of the powers that we exercise that occur in that sort of way.
Udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender har taget stilling til det forslag, der oprindeligt blev stillet af udvalget for budgetkontrol på initiativ af dets formand, hr. Aigner.
The Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions considered this proposal, which came originally from the Committee on Budgetary Control and was initiated by its chairman, Mr Aigner.
Anmodningen blev rettet til Parlamentets formand og henvist til udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender. Udvalget har først og fremmest set på det ud fra det synspunkt, at man ville sikre sig, at bestemmelsen var i overens stemmelse med den eksisterende forretningsordenen og dennes form.
That request was put to the President of Parliament and referred to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions.
Der blev foretaget enkelte redaktionelle ændringer i det oprindelige forslag fra budget kontroludvalget.
Some changes of a drafting nature were made in the original proposal from the Committee on Budgetary Control.
Vi har kun foretaget en indholdsmæssig ændring.
Only one change of substance was made.
Dette dukker op igen, fordi der er stillet et ændringsforslag af Cosentino.
This crops up again because an amendment by Mr Cosentino raises it.
Det vedrører spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt vi i forretningsordenen udtrykkeligt skal sige, hvad der ville ske i tilfælde, hvor der nægtes decharge, og Kommissionen ikke træder tilbage med det samme.
It concerns the question whether we should state specifically in our Rules what would happen in the event of a discharge being refused and the Commission not immediately resigning.
Udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender besluttede ikke at berøre dette nærmere i forretningsordenen, fordi det ville binde os, og vi mener, vi bør følge en mere fleksibel kurs.
The Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions decided not to say anything further about this in the Rules because it would tie us down and we think that we should adopt a more flexible approach.
Det er nok at sige, at Parlamentet har beføjelse til at nægte at give decharge og til at træffe bestemmelse om, hvordan det kan gøres.
It is sufficient to say that Parliament has the power to refuse a discharge and to make provisions for how that should be done.
Vi er klar over, at konsekvensen i almindelighed vil være, at Kommissionen træder tilbage.
We know that the normal consequence of that would be the resignation of the Commission.
Vi behøver ikke at gå længere.
We need go no further.
Parlamentets erfaringer fra de sidste 5 år har imidlertid lært os, at vi har brug for en bestemmelse, der giver mulighed for graduerede reaktioner over for Kommissionen, netop for at vi kan sætte en af vore stærkeste beføjelser målrettet ind og gøre det med passende kraft.
One doubts, I must say, the urgency of doing so when we have a situation year by year where the most important item in the accounts, namely the EAGGF figures, remains to be cleared and often awaits clearance for two, three or even more years after the discharge has
Jeg vil dog gerne nuancere ordførerens udtalelser og sige, at vi er uenige i et af begrundelsens aspekter.
We need new Rules to provide adequately for the exercise of it.
Dechargen et det naturlige, endelige og absolut nødvendige trin i budgetforløbet.
Mr Saby (S). — (FR) Mr President, we see no objection to Mr Price's proposal for a decision.
De relevante be­stemmelser forudser, at dechargeproceduren kun kan afbrydes af en udsættelse.
However, I should like to differ with the rapporteur and say that we disagree with one aspect of the explanatory state ment.
Dette svarer faktisk til en midlertidig nægtelse af at give decharge, for hvilken der skal gives en begrundelse.
We refute this because the discharge procedure involves both an audit of the accounts and a political evaluation of Budget No 1 or No 2.
Når man nægter at give Kommissionen decharge på denne måde, anmodes Kommissionen sædvanligvis om at bringe regnska­berne i orden, og når dette er sket, gives dechargen.
This, Mr President, means that, if the political evaluation is incorrect and if the targets set by the budget authority (the Council and Parliament) are not achieved, there are lessons to be learned and they must be made known to the committees with a view to the drafting of Budget No 1.
måde, der kan tydeliggøre i hvilket omfang, vi i det givne tilfælde er utilfredse.
We also need, however, to retain the possibility of voicing any disapproval we may feel in a manner that will leave no doubts as to the extent of our misgivings in each particular case.
Vi finder derfor hr. Prices forslag fornuftigt, dog er vi også positivt indstillet over for en tilføjelse fra budgetkontroludvalget, som hr. Price også nævnte.
We regard Mr Price's proposal therefore as a perfectly sensible one, and we are also well-disposed to the idea of the annex proposed by the Committee on Budgetary Countrol, which Mr Price mentioned.