natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Denne fremgangsmåde har ført til en vis teoretisk kritik fra de personers side, der er imod, at amerika nerne har gjort gældende, at de kun vil give beskyttelse til borgerne i de lande, der har vedtaget en lov givning, som De forenede Stater billiger. Dette er blevet beskrevet som pax americana på chipsbeskyttelsesområdet.
This approach has led to some academic criticism by those who object to the American assertion that they will only afford protection to the citizens of those countries which have enacted legislation of which the United States approves.
Men trods dette forsøg på i en vis ud strækning at gennemtvinge ensartethed vil det svar, der slås til lyd for i Turner-betænkningen, give hver enkelt medlemsstat mulighed for et element af fleksi-
But notwithstanding this attempt to impose a degree of uniformity, the particular response advocated by the Turner report will in fact allow an element of flexibility and an element of individuality to each of the Member States in terms of the precise legal nature of the protection afforded.
Hoon bilitet og et element af individualitet med hensyn til den krævede beskyttelses præcise retlige beskaffenhed. hed.
In most of the Member States there is no clear legal protection for the development of new integrated circuits.
Registrering af ophavs ret er den foretrukne løsning i De forenede Stater, det har ikke været den foretrukne løsning i Det forenede Kongerige. Det ville stride mod vor retstradition på dette område.
This protection is necessary to enable the semiconductor industry in the Member States to continue to invest in this field.
Måske vil den egentlige ophavsmands rettigheder på et senere tidspunkt blive omfattet af bestemmelser på rimelig vis. Dette spørgsmål vedrører ikke den foreliggende betænkning.
The development of a chip requires considerable investment in terms of capital, human resources and skill which it should be possible to offset by marketing the product.
Jeg vil gerne henlede opmærksomheden på, at disse ændringsforslag som helhed blev vedtaget i stor enighed, og at de efter min bedste overbevisning faktisk tjener til at forbedre Kommissionens forslag på visse punkter.
The proposal is therefore aimed at ensuring adequate commercial compensation for the financial and intellectual investment by protecting those elements which went into the original development of a topography against non-authorized copying.
Metten (S). — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg må på en del af mine gruppes vegne lade end noget mindre entusiastisk stemme lyde end mine forgængere.
Mr Metten (S). — (NL) Mr President, I should like on behalf of part of my group to strike a somewhat less enthusiastic note than the previous speakers.
Nødvendig heden af beskyttelse af kredsløbstopografier bestrides ikke af nogen.
The need to protect the topography of chips was not dealt with by anybody.
Det er blot ejendommeligt, at Fælles skabet tvinges til at lave et direktiv, der må være i overensstemmelse med den amerikanske semiconducter chip protection act. Endnu mere ejendommeligt er det imidlertid at Kommissionen ikke ser noget særligt heri og ikke protesterer imod det.
That the Commission should have been forced to introduce a directive which has to correspond to the American semiconducter chip protection act is in itself very peculiar. It is even more peculiar that the European Commission does not see any thing strange in this and does not say a word in protest against it.
Den nævnte amerikanske lov er jo et nyt eksempel på ekstratenitorial lovgivning, på lovgivning, der tvinder andre uafhængige lande til en hel specifik lovgivning.
The aforesaid American law is indeed a new example of extraterritorial legislation, of legislation which enforces very specific legislation on other independent countries.
Det foreliggende direktiv er således fremtvunget og bør tilfredsstille De forenede Stater.
The present directive therefore has been imposed upon us and serves to pacify the United States.
Men vil det så også det?
But will it do this?
Der har jeg mine tvivl.
I have my doubts about that.
Kommissionen mener f.eks. at man udelukkende ved hjælp af ophavsret kan imødekomme den amerikanske lov.
The Commission thinks for example that the require ments of the US law can be met exclusively through the use of copyright.
Men ophavsret tillader f.eks. ikke innocent infrigement og i endnu ringere grad reverse engineering, hvilket den amerikanske ret gør.
Copyright does not allow for example innocent infringement nor reverse engineer ing as the American law does.
En ophavsret giver automatisk beskyttelse til halvtreds år efter ophavsmandens død, mens den amerikanske lov kun giver ti års beskyttelse og udelukkende efter registrering.
Copyright gives automatic protection for fifty years after the death of the author, while the US law only offers protection for ten years and only after registration.
Jeg tror, at det samlede resultat bliver bedre, dersom hr. Metten tager sine forslag tilbage, idet de efter min mening delvis ikke kommer op højde med de forbedringer, udvalget om retlige anliggender og borgernes rettigheder har foretaget, og jeg tror, at det i sidste instans ikke vil gavne sagen.
Otherwise such a development could be an obstacle to the free circulation of goods containing semi-productive products and thereby create new obstacles to free trade.
En anden vigtig indvending mod direktivet er, at det er et såkaldt ikkeharmoniserende direktiv.
A second important objection to the directive is that it fails to live up to its claim to harmonize.
Det er den fleksibilitet, som hr. Hoon nævnte.
That is the flexibility which Mr Hoon spoke about.
Det er naturligvis påfaldende for en Kommission, som har sat gen nemførelsen af det interne marked uden grænsehindringer øverst på listen.
This is really astonishing from a Commission whose prime objective is the realization of the internal market without frontier restrictions.
Da medlemsstaterne er uenige, har Kommissionen helt pragmatisk ladet mange lovgivningsmuligheder stå åbne i direktivet.
Because the Member States disagree, the Commission however left many very pragmatic legislation options open in the directive.
Jeg tror, at det er Parlamentets opgave at være noget mindre opportunistisk.
I think that it is incumbent upon Parliament to be less opportunistic.
Derfor har jeg stillet et par ændringsforslag for i højere grad at bringe direktivet i overens stemmelse med det interne markeds ånd.
Therefore I have tabled several amendments to bring the directive more into line with the spirit of the inter nal market.
Det foreliggende direktiv, som vi skal træffe afgørelse om, er et af de helt sjældne, virkelig europæiske lov givningsarbejder.
The matter has become all the more urgent since it has become necessary to ensure that the Community semiconductor industry will continue to enjoy legal protection in the United States, and this will only be possible through the rapid adoption of a system of protection in the EEC which would meet the reciprocity criteria laid down in the USA 'Chip Protection Act' which is a precondition for protecting foreign producers.
Det er meget beskedent og så kom pliceret, at den europæiske offentlighed formodentlig ikke vil tage særlig notits af det, men alligevel er der her tale om en nødvendig og påtrængende indførelse af regler for Europa.
In answer to Mr Metten's question I can state that the competent authorities in the USA have agreed to extend the provisional authorization of protection for semiconductor products which the Member States already enjoy and to include, for the first time, Spain and Portugal.
I vore øren lyder stadig de man ge klager over den teknologiske kløft i forholdet til USA og Japan.
Mr President, I should like to finish by putting a very specific question to the Commissioner: how precisely does he view the temporary protection introduced by the United States which ends tomorrow?
Dem kommer dette forslag til gode, og på den baggrund bør vi se på det.
If this is not the case, can you explain what the problems are?
Jeg vil lige komme med en kort supplerende bemærkning.
With regard to the amendments, I am happy to state that the Commission in general accepts the proposals of the Legal Affairs Committee.
Vi skal simpelt hen tage til efterretning, at hele
On a very small number of points we can argue in favour of a different wording or, indeed, deeper reflection.
Hr. formand, jeg vil slutte med et helt specifikt spørgsmål til kommissæren: Hvorledes ser det præ cist ud med den midlertidige beskyttelse, som De for enede Stater har givet, og som skulle udløbe i morgen?
Mr Cardoso E Cunha, Member ofthe Commission. — (PT) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the Com mission welcomes and wishes to express its appreciation of the interesting debate which preceded my statement, since, as has already been repeatedly stressed, this is an area marked by a high level of innovation and one in which Community legislation is advancing into largely uncharted areas.
Hr. Turner har ganske svagt sagt noget herom.
We also accept the principles contained in Amend ments Nos 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 11 and 12 where we intend to introduce a few small changes of wording.
Kunne De sige, om den forlænges, og i bekræftende fald indtil hvilket tidspunkt?
With regard to the last part of Amendment No 5 and Amendment No 7 we accept the principles they embody, although we wish to consider more carefully the best way of incorporating them in our response.
Hvis det ikke er tilfældet, kan De så redegøre for, hvilke problemer der er dermed?
The Commission's propsal is, of course, aimed at pro viding protection in all the Member States, in line with the joint principles set out in the directive, for integrated circuit projects and for analogous semiconductor products.
Cardoso E Cunha, medlem af Kommissionen. — (PT) Hr. formand, mine damer og hener, på Kommissionens vegne takker jeg for den interessante debat, der er gået forud for mit indlæg.
Mr von Stauffenberg raised an original and interesting point which the Commission will be happy to consider with a view to very probably taking it on board.
Hr. Stauffenberg fremsatte en original og interessant bemærkning.
I must emphasize that the directive is a major step for ward.
Kommissionen takker og vil overveje at medtage den i sit forslag.
The Commission proposal includes a table which shows the current state of legislation in all the Member States.
I størstedelen af medlemslandene findes der i dag ikke nogen præcis retlig beskyttelse af udformningen af nye integrerede kredsløb.
In at least two Member States, Spain and Portugal, there is virtually no legislation to protect animals used in experiments.
En sådan beskyttelse må sikres, så medlemsstaternes respektive industrier fortsat kan investere i denne sektor.
The directive would, therefore, introduce a common approach and common obligations.
Jeg vil også på Kommissionens vegne takke Parlamentet for den hurtighed, hvormed sagen er blevet behandlet, og for den givne støtte til Kommissionens forslag.
I should also like to express the Commission's gratitude to Parliament for the speed with which it dealt with the matter and for the wide support it has shown for the Commission's proposals.
Endvidere vil jeg takke ordføreren for det udmærkede arbejde med en sag, der er ny og af yderst teknisk karakter.
I wish to thank the rapporteur for the excellent work he has done on a matter which is very new and highly technical.
Men disse kredsløb er et let bytte for piratvirksomhed, fordi de eksisterende projekter let lader sig kopiere for et beløb, der er langt mindre end det, der var nødvendigt til den oprindelige udvikling.
A favourable opinion from Parliament will be a very important contribution towards bringing about the necessary rapid adopting of the directive.
Parlamentets positive holdning vil være et vigtigt skridt fremad mod den nødvendige, hurtige iværksættelse af direktivet.
For example, in my own country, the United Kingdom, the latest figures for 1983 showed that some 3 600 000 animals were used in that one year alone in experiments to help in the production of drugs and other products.
Europæisk konvention om beskyttelse af dyr
European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals
Man må også undgå, at retlig beskyttelse opstår ukoordineret, hvilket vil skade vort mål: det indre marked.
In the time available to me, which is very short, I simply want to go through the amendments which the committee is proposing.
Tværtimod kunne den frie bevægelighed af varer, der indeholder halvledere, derved blive be grænset, så der opstod handelsindringer.
The Commission has our good wishes, even though they may not have our faith in the adequacy of the legal base they are using.
A 2-94/86) af Caroline Jackson for udvalget om miljø- og sundhedsanliggender og for brugerbeskyttelse om forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet (KOM(85) 637 endel. — dok.
A 2-94/86) by Mrs Caroline Jackson, on behalf of the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Con sumer Protection, on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(85) 637 final — Doc.
C 2-160/85) til direktiv om beskyttelse af dyr, der anvendes til forsøg og andre videnskabelige formål.
C 2-160/85) for a directive on the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes.
Som et direkte svar på hr. Mettens spørgsmål kan jeg oplyse, at de kompetente myndigheder i USA allerede har besluttet at forlænge den midelertidige beskyttelse af halvlederprodukter fra medlemsstaterne, her under nu også Spanien og Portugal.
The other point that we made in Article 1 was that we wanted to emphasize constantly that there should be a minimum use of animals and a search for alternatives.
Det glæder mig at kunne sige, at Kommissionens stil ling generelt set er en accept på de ændringsforslag, som udvalget om retlige anliggender og borgernes ret tigheder har stillet. Vi vil dog for visse punkters ved
In Article 5 we emphasize the need for a proper licensing system and we came to the conclusion that the Commission's proposals as regards licensing of experiments were extremely feeble and needed reinforcing. forcing.
Denne betænkning er højdepunktet i Europa-Parlamentets meget langvarige engagement i spørgsmålet om beskyttelse af dyr, der anvendes i forsøg.
This report is the culmination of a very long involve ment by the European Parliament in the question of the protection of animals used in experiments.
Der var beslutninger for et stykke tid siden af fru Dury, hr. Glinne, fru Seibel-Emmerling og andre.
There were resolutions some time ago by Mrs Duty, Mr Glinne, Mrs Seibel Emmerling and others.
Der var Schleicher-betænkningen i 1984 om begrænsning af dyreforsøg og beskyttelse af laboratoriedyr.
There was the Schleicher report in 1984 on the limitation of animal experiments and the protection of laboratory animals.
Hvis det lykkes os at få denne betænkning igennem i morgen
Consequently, you will find that in our report we abolished these annexes, removed those points and put them in the body of the directive.
Caroline Jackson tidlig, vil det være en betydelig sejr for Parlamentet. Kommissionens forslag er absolut et svar på vore henstillinger.
Jackson munity, and it is right, therefore, that the other institutions of the the Community should respond properly to those feelings.
dyr efter forsøg, til bilagene — vist nok bilag III, IV og V, men jeg husker muligvis forkert.
lish a universal degree of control in all our Member States on the use of live animals in experiments.
Nogle vil have set de folk, der demonstrerede uden for Parlamentet i dag.
It is the first time that the European Commission has made somewhat tentative steps towards a licensing system.
Stort set var de folk, der demonstrerede, imod enhver anvendelse af levende dyr i forsøg. Den drøftelse, vi havde i miljøudvalget, afslørede absolut den meningsforskel, der findes mellem de medlemmer, der mente, at den trinvise frem gangsmåde, der er indeholdt i direktivet, var ønske lig, og dem der gerne ville gå meget hurtigere frem.
Personally, and I cannot speak as rapporteur because the committee was in two minds about this, I would like to see on a European basis a system of licensing the use of animals by authorizing the people who do experiments using them, the places where they are experimented upon and the programme of experiments that uses them.
Jeg må understrege, at direktivet er et betydeligt fremskridt.
It was open for signature as from 6 December 1985.
Kommissionens forslag indeholder en oversigt, der viser den nugældende lovgivning i alle medlemsstater.
There is provision in the Convention for signature by the Community as a whole, as well as by individual countries.
I mindst to medlemsstater, Spanien og Portugal, findes der i realiteten ikke nogen lovgivning til beskyttelse af dyr, der anvendes i forsøg. Direktivet vil derfor indføre en fælles fremgangsmåde og fælles forpligtelser.
The Convention lays down conditions which should be applied by signatory coun tries in their national legislation to ensure that the minimum possible number of animals is used in experiments, that standards of care are maintained and that any experimentation involves as little suffering to the animals as possible.
Hvad er hovedpunkterne i betænkningen? Jeg vil henlede Deres opmærksomhed på følgende karakterisktik træk : Det er første gang, Det europæiske Fæl lesskab har forsøgt at indføre en almen kontrol i alle vore medlemsstater med anvendelsen af levende dyr i forsøg.
It is essential that the European Community should try to avoid useless duplication of animal experiments.
Personligt — og jeg kan ikke tale som ordfører, da der var delte meninger i udvalget — vil jeg gerne på euro pæisk plan se et system, hvor man giver tilladelse til at anvende dyr ved at give autorisation til de personer, der udfører forsøg, hvori de anvendes, de steder hvor forsøgene udføres, og det forsøgsprogram hvori de indgår.
We have at the moment, for example, pharmaceutical directives in force in this Community which mean that pharmaceutical companies are very often in the position of carrying out the same experiments in different Member States because the degree of mutual recognition which we would all think desirable has not been reached.
F.eks. i mit land, Det forenede Kongerige, viste de seneste tal for 1983, at omkring 3 600 000 dyr alene i dette ene år blev anvendt i forsøg som led i produktionen af lægemidler og andre produkter.
As I have already indicated, the Commission's proposal for a Community directive embodies the principal objectives and main elements of the Convention and backs them with the force of Community law.
Det er af afgørende betydning, at Det europæiske Fællesskab forsøger at undgå unødige dobbeltforsøg med dyr.
Moreover, the directive goes further: it introduces certain other important elements which will be specific to the European Community.
Der er f.eks. for øjeblikket farmaceutiske direktiver i kraft i Fællesskabet, der betyder, at de farmaceutiske virksomheder meget ofte udfører de samme forsøg i forskellige medlemsstater, da man ikke har nået den grad af gensidig anerkendelse, som vi alle mener er ønskelig.
For example, the require ment for prior notification of animal experimentation, the prohibition of experiments on endangered species and rules for avoiding the infliction of pain and suffer ing or for eliminating unnecessary duplication of tests. These will all provide additional guarantees for the protection of animals.
Jeg henleder også Deres opmærksomhed på, at der for øjeblikket er ikke mindre end seks EF-direktiver i kraft, der siger, at LD50-testen skal anvendes.
I would also draw your attention to the fact that there are at the moment no less than six European Com munity directives in force which specify that the lethal dose 50 test shall be used.
Det betyder, at der dør et antal dyr — hver dag velsagtens
This means that a number of animals die — I would think every day — in order that EEC legislation may come into force.
Jeg me ner ikke, det er noget, der er ønskeligt.
I do not think that that is something that is desirable.
Der er visse forsøg inden for området dyreforsøg, som folk kender
There are some tests within the area of animal experiments that people know about.
Vi håber, de vil være tilstrækkelig solide til at gennem føre denne lovgivning i Rådet.
You will find that we hope that these tests can be reduced in number and alternatives explored.
til. Der er LD50-testen, der indebærer, at produkterne testes på dyr, for at man kan finde frem til letal dosis, og Draize-øjetesten, der indebærer, at et stof sprøjtes direkte ind i dyrets øje.
I am sure I do not have to remind the House that in 1984 the Parliament pressed for a directive to fulfil the terms of the Convention and to ensure its application at the Community level.
Vedrørende artikel 1 var der megen strid i udvalget.
That was followed by a barrage of further action.
Det er en meget uklar vending, men jeg gør opmærksom på, at miljøudvalget med et snævert flertal mente, at det skulle være sådan.
So the Commission was left in absolutely no doubt about the Parliament's convictions on this topic. I applaud that fact and we acted on it.
Det er de hovedpunkter, som udvalget gerne vil fremhæve.
Those are the main points on which the committee would like to insist.
De behandles i en række meget vigtige ændringsforslag.
They are dealt with in a number of very important amendments.
Jeg håber, at Kommissionen, når den svarer i denne forhandling, vil sige, at den i det mindste vil acceptere de ændringsforslag, der vedrører de punkter, jeg har gjort opmærksom på.
I hope that the Commission will, when it responds to this debate, say that it will at least accept amendments which deal with the points that I have drawn attention to.
Hvis nogle medlemmer ønsker at forhale sagen — vi har nemlig 93 ændringsforslag foran os — og vil henvise den til fornyet udvalgsbehandling, beder jeg dem blot om at spørge sig selv, hvor mange flere dyr der skal og lide, mens vi øder tiden væk i Parlamentet.
If any Member wishes to delay this matter because we have 93 amend ments in front of us and wants to refer it back to com mittee, I simply ask them to ask themselves how many more animals must suffer and die while we fiddle around in this Parliament.
Vi syntes ikke om den måde, hvorpå Kommissionen havde henlagt noget, som den kalder »smertebetingelsen«, »bedøvelsesbetingelsen« og behandlingen af
I remember the discussions very well. I told the House that the directive would not be forthcoming until the Commission had satisfied itself fully that every policy aspect of animal experimentation had been properly reviewed.
Clinton Davis, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, må jeg indlede med at komplimentere
Mr Clinton Davis, Member of the Commission. — Mr President, may I begin by congratulating the rappor teur on her report and thanking her for the general welcome she has given to the draft directive proposed by the Commission.
direktivforslaget »var en betydelig sejr for den tværpolitiske gruppe i Parlamentet«.
and safety' and paragraphs 1(b) and 2 of Amendment No 10 and also Amendment No 82.
Spørgsmålet om dyreforsøg vækker fortsat lidenskaber, ikke blot hvad angår Parlamentet, men også hos vælgere i hele Fællesskabet, og det er derfor på sin plads, at de øvrige fællesskabsinstitutioner reagerer adækvat på disse følelser.
I would also like to make it plain that we intend to give very positive consideration to some of the ideas advanced in the motion for a resolution which is now before the House. For example, like you we believe it is right to place greater emphasis on the development of alternative procedures not involving live animals and to avoid unnecessary duplication of experiments involving animals.
Men lad mig ikke undervurdere den tværpolitiske gruppes betydning.
But let me not weaken the emphasis on the role of the intergroup.