natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg vil derfor til rådsformanden sige, at de øjeblikkelige begivenheder under ingen omstændigheder må foranledige os til at frafalde dette ændringsforslag til fordel for det polske folk lige så lidt som dets gennemførelse.
Mr Georgiadis. — (GR) Mr President, dear colleagues, we Greek Socialists are fully aware of the fact that just as in the previous exercise of drawing up the budget, so in this final phase of discussion on the
De polske myndigheder meddelte os, at den bedste og hurtigste hjælp ville være i form af disse ekstra forsyninger af oksekød, og oksekødet leveres gratis.
A European bureau for international youth organizations should be given a chance to develop particularly at this time of very high unemployment among young people.
Ser vi nærmere på den europæiske socialfond og sammenholder 1981 med de foreslåede bevillinger, er der tale om en meget lille forøgelse, som vi ikke billiger, fordi vi gerne vil have en større.
farmers, agricultural modernization unfettered indus trial policy, protection for small and mediumsized undertakings, and support for regional development and social policy are critical issues where Community aims will be put to the test. Overall, Greece will have a net profit for 1981 not exceeding 0-8% of the Community budget.
Det må på dette punkt bemærkes, at selv om medlemsstaterne i højere grad tyr til støtte fra den europæiske social fond, sker der ikke tilsvarende forhøjelser af de beløb, som er rådighed, ofte med temmelig lang somme procedurer.
If one considers that about one-third of Greece's income consists of artificial refunds which will gradually be reduced during the transitional period, it is clear that the real net financial profit may be reduced to nothing or turned into a deficit.
Oksekødet repræsenerer en værdi af 10 mio, altså ekstra 10 mio, som Polen ikke ville have fået, hvis ikke Parlamentet havde opført dem på budgettet, og hvis ikke Rådet havde accepteret, at Polen ønskede hjælpen på denne måde.
If, in particular, one takes account of the negative consequences of accession on Greece's production and international trade, it is clear that Greece requires special treatment to deal with the problems arising from its accession to the Community.
Jeg kan forsikre det ærede medlem om, at Polen er et alt fol; vigtigt et spørgsmål for os til, at vi forsøger at lave numre eller taler om budgetposter eller hænger os i petitesser.
The amendments under discussion proposed by the European Parliament cannot make any significant change to the above factors. Despite all this, we shall vote in favour of the partial improvements, but we will have no delusions about the limits of these amend ments.
Vi var helt enige med hr. Langes i, at det vigtigste var at få sendt noget til Polen så hurtigt som muligt og på den måde, Polen ønskede det.
We undoubtedly would have preferred it if the European Parliament had expressed the political will necessary to reject the budget as a whole.
Hvad angår de øvrige bevillinger, bemærker vi, at vi til Fællesskabets industripolitik har meget få fælles industriprogrammer, som er gennemført med succes — blandt disse kunne vi anføre programmerne for Airbus og Ariane — mens det er muligt med koordinerede anstrengelser at nå bedre resultater.
Mr President, this budget debate is also revealing opposition between North and South, this time within Europe, and it cannot be overcome with the present resources of the Social and Regional Funds. In a Community of the Ten and soon of the Twelve such opposition in socio-economic development cannot be allowed to continue, and it can only be overcome by greatly increasing the resources of these Funds.
Vi tror, at der er mulighed for en forbedret situation, hvis der eventuelt kunne fremkomme forsøg på ligestilling mellem de forskellige medlemsstater i Fællesskabet.
We feel it is a good idea for the Council and Parliament to reach more detailed and clearer agreements in the coming year on the difference between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure.
Jeg vil gerne nævne som karakteristisk, at vi har bemærket, at der er opført nogle ganske få konti til infrastrukturarbejder i Grækenland, hvorimod der er mange flere til andre medlemsstater, som er mere udviklede.
In other words, are separate regulations also needed before certain items of the budget can be imple mented, even though, it should be noted, the Council must again agree unanimously on these regulations? Is that really necessary, we ask the Council?
Endvidere vil jeg gerne nævne en detalje, som imidlertid er betydningsfuld for os, nemlig at skønt Kommissionen har billiget og foreslået en forøgelse af antallet af græske embedmænd ved de forskellige fællesskabsinstitutioner med tal, som er sat i forhold til de andre stater, er det indtil dette øjeblik endnu ikke gennemført.
Mr President, as the 1984 elections to the European Parliament approach, there should be growing aware ness in the Council that the curtailment of powers and the maintenance of procedures that have the effect of neutralizing each other may have disastrous consequences for Parliament's image, which is not strong even now.
Pfennig. — (DE) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, jeg er af den opfattelse, at der i budgetforslaget for 1982 måske for sidste gang træffes udgiftsbeslutninger i den traditionelle form.
We feel the European Parliament will need great courage to set priorities at a time when money is so scarce. It means Parliament must have the courage to make choices and delete items in favour of sectors of policy that require greater emphasis.
Vi og Rådet gør nemlig ikke andet, når man betragter tingene ganske nøgternt.
It also means that we Members of Parliament must reduce our incomes.
De gamle budgettal er på ny blevet fremskrevet, en ny dimension er trods alle fra Parlamentets side planlagte udgifter og udgiftsbeslutninger ikke opnået.
We were very disappointed by Parliament's inability in November to decide to reduce its own expenses: travel and subsistence allowances and the cost of equipment.
Arbejdsløsheden i Fællesskabet stiger med forrygende fart, og i løbet af et år, fra 1980 til 1981, havde vi en stigning i størrelsesordenen 12,5 %, og i dag er der over ti mia. arbejdsløse.
Let us not have a situation like last November, when it proved impossible to get together the 218 votes required for the adoption of amendments.
Inflationen havde en gennemsnitstakt på omkring 10 %, men der er kraftige forskelle mellem medlemsstaterne, fra 5 % til 25,%, som skaber problemer for de lande, som rammes af den største inflation.
It is humiliating, for example, that this means the European Institute for Business Sciences in Maastricht cannot be subsidized.
Der er heller ikke tvivl om, at der er stor ulighed i landmændenes indtægter, når man sammenligner landene i nord og syd, og dette skyldes en negativ behandling af middelhavsprodukterne.
This is also true of various amendments tabled by the Committee on Energy and Research which could not be adopted because not enough Members were present. I therefore hope that the
Grunden hertil er forholdsvis let at få øje på.
Mr Fich. — (DA) Mr President, it is worth taking a look at what has happened in the budgetary procedure up to now.
Parlamentet havde krævet, at Kommissionen skulle løse sin opgave i forbindelse med det såkaldte mandat af 30. maj inden afslutningen af budgetdrøftelserne 1982.
What has happened is this: — agricultural expenditure for 1982 has been steadily reduced through the procedure, so that things are now looking up in that respect.
Det er af forskellige grunde ikke sket, således at den tilstræbte nye politiske dimension i Det europæiske Fællesskab næsten ikke genspejler sig i budgettet for 1982.
It is true that the EAGGF Guarantee Section funds for 1982 are still 17% above the 1981 figure, but we will naturally hope to get this reduced further in the course of 1982.
dør og venter på optagelse i dette Fællesskab.
case that the research sector is very inefficient?
Hvis vi indtil da ikke har fundet frem til en ny dimension i Det europæiske Fællesskabs politik og dermed også dets budget, så vil dette Fællesskab definitivt komme i uføre.
Is it not the case that the Regional Fund is to a large extent only a repayment mechanism?
Formanden. — Landbrugsudvalget har ordet.
We are also all aware of the criticism which has been made recently about food aid.
For mig drejer det sig frem for alt om', at problemet med landbrugsudgifternes dominans fremdeles ikke er løst, skønt Fællesskabet'nu i 10 år har beskæftiget sig med det.
And something else has happened which is worth noting, that is, the Regional Fund has been increased, if I am not mistaken, by 27% and the Social Fund by 38% in payment appropriations and I consider this quite a hefty sum which Parliament ought to be generally quite satisfied with.
En stærkere nedskæring af landbrugsudgifterne fore kommer mig ikke mulig, da det ville føre til yderligere massive indkomsttab for bønderne, hvad i det mindste min gruppe og vel også flertallet i dette Parlament siger nej til.
It has not given much thought to the quality of the different items of expenditure, but merely tried to make the overall amount as large as possible.
Skønt landbrugsudgifterne i 1982 kun udgør 62 % af budgettet, er vi ikke i stand til at føre en'blot nogen lunde fornunftig europæisk politik med de resterende 38 % på de af Parlamentet ønskede områder, dvs. regionalpolitik, socialpolitik, energi, transport-, middelhavspolitik osv.
In this budgetary procedure I have been glad about one thing in particular, and that is that, on a Socialist proposal, we have succeeded in blocking the Fourth Financial Protocol on Turkey.
Fanton, ordfører for udtalelsen. — (FR) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, Rådets forhandlinger har skuffet land brugsudvalget, det kan vi vist godt indrømme.
The Council of Ministers unanimously approved our resolution and I think this is a very welcome step.
Dog tror jeg, at der findes en enkelt lille undtagelse, men den er så uvæsentlig, at den ikke fortjener at blive nævnt.
This is a very strange episode on which we would naturally like some clarification.
Det skyldes først og fremmest, at Kommissionen til dato ikke har forelagt finansierbare forslag på disse politiske områder.
The debate we ought to be having is about the impact of the appropriations: and not an academic debate about compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure.
Endvidere ligger det i, at Rådet på grund af budgetproblemerne i Det europæiske Fælles skabs medlemsstater ønsker at se Fællesskabets 1 %-merværdiafgiftandel udnyttet så lidt som muligt.
In such a debate it would, in my view, be possible to reach a compromise with the Council about the content and costs of the policy we should actually be adopting. But it does not look as if we are seeking a compromise.
Følgen deraf er, at vi i realiteten kun anvender 0,89 % af de mulige indtægter, og dette i øvrigt ikke med en skattemæssig aflastning af borgerne i Fælles skabet som resultat, men udelukkende med en omkanalisering af disse indtægter i de nationale budget kasser til følge.
What we shall presumably finish up with, when we have adopted our draft amendments on Thursday and the Council has given the extra that it can give, will be a difference of 0-4%, I repeat, 0-4% of the total budget and that is what people are trying to create a budget crisis about this year!
Kære kolleger, hvis denne udvikling fortsætter, så vil vi snart definitivt gå i ring.
We had a budget crisis in 1981, we had a major budget crisis in 1980, and the impression is gradually growing that Parliament is set on preventing the Community from functioning.
Landbrugsudgifternes dominans vil fremdeles blive holdt os for øje som et onde, medens der samtidig ikke bevilges disponible midler til andre politikker.
If one considers on top of this that there are at present 85 proposals from the Council which Parliament has not dealt with and if one considers how Parliament refuses to deliver an opinion on certain matters, one is forced to the conclusion that Parliament's principal activity is to obstruct the Community's work.
Vi må bryde denne cirkel nu, hvis Det europæiske Fællesskab ikke skal strande.
I am prepared to do battle for left against right or some thing else, but I think this battle between the institutions is sterile and does not lead anywhere.
Landbrugsudvalget har fundet det overordentlig beklageligt, at Rådet har forkastet samtlige de forslag til ændringer, der vedrører nomenklaturen.
One irritating aspect of this year's budgetary negotiations has been that it has not been possible to elicit more information about the actual amount paid back to the United Kingdom.
Der var i dette tilfælde overhovedet ikke tale om ekstraudgifter.
We have tried on various occasions to extract this information, but in vain.
Der var på ingen måde tale om at bringe den europæiske opbygning ind på en farlig vej.
We are not opposed to the repayment, but simply want to know what it amounts to.
Det var først landbrugsudvalgets og dernæst forsamlingens mål at få bragt lidt klarhed ind i Fællesskabernes regnskaber — ikke mindst på landbrugsområdet.
For example, I have not yet managed to find out where the houses which are being built in Northern Ireland with the money from the special repayments to the United Kingdom actually are.
En af de fore gående talere var for lidt siden endnu en gang inde på landbrugsudgifternes 62 %; jeg har på landbrugsudvalgets vegne bestræbt mig på at bevise, at en væsentlig del af disse 62 % ikke skyldtes landbrugernes holdning, men derimod politiske beslutninger, hvoraf vi netop er ved at drøfte én, som er af brændende aktualitet, idet jeg tænker på hjælpen til Polen.
Under this head no less than 33 million EUA have been allocated to house-building in Northern Ireland, but I have not yet found any Member who knew where these houses are and whether they are being built.
Samtidig med at Rådet afslog at ændre nomenklaturen, accepterede det for et øjeblik siden — hr. Tugendhat har netop givet svaret på dette punkt — en ekstrabevilling til Polen og anførte på en måde, at denne bevilling skulle falde ind under EUGFL.
Mr Deschamps. — (FR) Mr President, as another speaker said a few moments ago — and, quite rightly, you did not contradict him — this budget debate cannot be, even at this stage, a purely technical debate. It is, and always will be, a political debate.
Som om denne sag havde noget at gøre med den fælles landbrugspolitik!
My brief remarks to you now also fall into the realm of politics, the human face of politics.
Bagefter er der så dem, der forbavses over de europæiske topmøders fiaskoer!
I shall not, however, be following the example of Mr Gendebien.
Når Rådet ikke gør det ringeste for at skabe lidt mere klarhed, hvordan skal man så kunne forestille sig, at stats- og regeringscheferne skal kunne træffe deres afgørelser i fuld klarhed, når Rådet gør alt, hvad det kan, for at tilsløre disse spørgsmål?
I believe in fact that, out of courtesy to this House, which has unanimously expressed its outrage at what is happening in Poland but which has unanimously decided that its response should be effective and responsible, less concerned with publicity than effect, I should await the debate which will take place here on the day appointed by this House acting unanimously. mously.
Vi må i 1982 helt konkret sørge for, at Kommissionen på de af os ønskede områder forelægger afgørelsesmodne forslag om finansieringsspørgsmål og en budgetstrukturreform, således at Rådet til stadighed bliver tvunget til afgørelser med henblik på en revitalisering og reform af Det europæiske Fællesskab.
Mr President, a central theme in this whole debate is that of classification and that is surely a very academic matter. There are perhaps 2 000 people, not more, i.e. the staff in the Community institutions, who know what it is actually about.
Kun hvis vi benytter vore begrænsede midler konsekvent, vil vi opnå en ny politisk dimension og dermed til syvende og sidst et politisk tilfredsstillende dimensioneret budget.
That leave some 270 million people who have no idea what this discussion about compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure is about.
Hr. formand, min gruppe har ikke for vane at kritisere Rådet, og undertiden er Kommissionen af den opfattelse, at vi ikke deler vor kritik ligeligt; men i dag kan Kommissionen læde sig, idet det i den fore liggende sag virkelig er Rådet, der har opført sig helt absurd !
This being a budget debate I shall speak therefore about the budgetary aspect of the Polish problem. And I shall speak on just one item, namely the amendment to the 1981 budget which provides for 10 million ECU for the transport of food supplies to Poland.
Hr. formand, jeg har nu fremført det, som jeg havde at sige på landbrugsudvalgets vegne, og for at undgå at tage ordet på min gruppes vegne, vil jeg gerne have lov fil at tilføje et par ord.
Community really wants if, as I am sure it will, Parliament confirms by its vote the amendment which it passed last month in favour of Poland.
Jeg har, hr. formand, været inde på nomenklaturen, og jeg har fremhævet dette punkt, idet vi på begge sider må bestræbe os på at skabe lidt klarhed på disse områder, dersom vi virkelig en dag ønsker at komme bort fra disse institutionelle debatter, som hr. Pfennig for lidt siden var inde på.
In speaking of these appropriations for Poland, the President of the Council referred to the exceptional situation prevailing in that country today, over which has fallen an impenetrable cloak of brooding silence which is causing great anguish to us all.
Med rette anførte han før, at der i Europa kun findes et par tusind mennesker — og så er han endda optimist — der forstår problemerne i forbindelse med de ikkeobligatoriske og obligatoriske udgifter, hvordan man skelner imellem dem og forskellen på dem . . .
This silence, this isolation and the agony that the splendid and tragic Polish people are having to suffer have, unfortunately, only served to increase the threat of famine and death which hangs over the old people, women and children there.
Og når man så ser, hvordan man på højtidelige topmøder, der samtidig beskæftiger sig med den fælles landbrugspolitik og budgetproblemer, de britiske bidrag og EUGFL, som den mest naturlige ting i verden efter 48 timers — jeg tør ikke kalde det drøftelser, men i hvert fald taler — udsætter det hele til senere, så kan man ikke andet end foruroliges.
Mr Tugendhat, Vice-President of the Commission. — Mr President, the honourable gentleman has raised an important point, but I think there is a misunderstanding which I would like to clarify.
Hr. formand, jeg har fremhævet denne side af sagen, og nu vil jeg så gerne have lov til at sige et par ord om to problemer, der forekommer os at være af vigtighed.
What I have to say to the President of the Council is that under no circumstances should the events now taking place in Poland persuade us to withdraw this amendment in favour of the Polish people or dissuade us from implementing it.
Således har landbrugsudvalget overtaget samtlige de af forsamlingen vedtagne ændringsforslag for at genfremsætte dem.
On the contrary, now is the time for Europe to show its mettle, to use its energy and imagination in ensuring that this gesture which Parliament is resolved on making is translated into concrete reality.
Hr. formand, jeg vil blot sige, at min gruppe er af den opfattelse, at den fælles landbrugspolitik er en sag, hvorfra der ikke bør gøres undtagelser, og som ikke kan ændres i sit grundlag.
Firstly, the Commission agreed with Parliament that it would be better for the aid to Poland to be entered under Article 950, in other words, as disaster aid.
I denne antagelse vil vi kunne være sikre på, at den fælles landbrugspolitik nu og i frem tiden kan danne grundlaget for Europa.
I am sorry about that, but there is nothing I can do about it. We have done as much as we can, and that is that.
Croux. — (NL) Hr. formand, kære kolleger, inden for de beføjelser, som Europa-Parlamentet har i kraft af traktaterne, prioriterer vor gruppe forslag og ændringsforslag på energi- og forskningsområdet højt.
Secondly, when the conciliation procedure took place between Parliament and the Council, the Parliamentary delegation, of which the honourable gentleman was not a member, made it quite clear that the most important thing was to secure an extra 10 million for Poland.
Alle institutionerne har erklæret, at de tillægger energi og forskning meget stor betydning.
Now, although the 10 million has not been entered in the budget in the way we would have liked, it is in the budget.
Dette har vist sig så sent som i sidste uge i London, hvor Rådet bl.a. talte om nye politiske foranstaltninger, navnlig inden for energi, forskning og industriel udvikling.
The Commission therefore asked the Poles how they would like to receive the aid, because after all the object was to help them.
Vi vil gerne understrege, at vi ikke genfinder dette i budgetforslagene, således som de fremlægges af Rådet. Det er vi ikke enige i.
The Polish authorities told us that the best and quickest way to do it was to provide it in the form of this extra beef, and the beef is being supplied free.
Dernæst ønskede vi så at overtage de tekster, der var blevet vedtaget af forsamlingen, men i form af forslag til ændringer.
Mr Commissioner, I do not want on this point, and I am sure I am speaking on behalf of everyone in this House, any ambiguity.
Lad os et øjeblik gå ud fra, at ændringerne er behæftet med formelle fejl, der skulle medføre, at de ikke kan behandles: så forhindrer det dog ikke Kommissionen og Rådet i at have uret i — hvis jeg tør udtrykke mig således — energisk at modsætte sig oprettelsen af et fælles eksportkontor for landbrugsprodukter.
From what we read in the newspapers, well before the events of Sunday, we understood, and we rejoiced at the news, that these 8 000 tonnes of beef were to be a Christmas gift from the European Community to the Polish people, an additional gift from existing stocks of Irish and French beef.
Kommissionens embedsmænd synes at være bange for, at man skal trænge ind på deres enemærker.
It would now appear that these 8 000 tonnes do not constitute an additional gift but are merely a different way of using the 10 million ECU in the account.
Men det blev der altså ikke noget af.
Let me repeat and sum up exactly what it is that we in this Parliament want.
Jeg kunne have ønsket, at Rådet for en gangs skyld havde lagt vægt på effektiviteten.
Firstly, we want a vote confirming the amendment giving the 10 million ECU for Poland and its implementation.
Hvor mange gange har man ikke oplevet, at ministrene har bebrejdet Kommissionen ikke at have opfyldt denne eller hin opgave!
Secondly, we want you, in your reply, to remove all ambiguity.
Når man så ser, hvordan Rådet undlader at tage imod forsamlingens forslag, så spørger man sig selv, hvad det tilstræber . . .
What we are looking for is both the 10 million ECU for the transport of food supplies and the 8 000 tonnes of beef as an additional Christmas gift.
Et af de få lyspunkter er, at Rådet ved anden behandling optog et beløb på 30 mio RE til udvikling af mikroelektronik.
It represents an additional 10 million, 10 million that they would not have had if you had not entered it into the budget and if the Council had not agreed.
Men det er også det eneste.
Further more, that was the way in which the Poles said they wanted it.
Det, som særlig foruroliger os, og det er min anden bemærkning, hr. formand, er, at der på energiområdet ikke gøres nok for kulpolitikken.
I do assure the honourable gentleman that Poland is far too important an issue for us to try to play games or to talk about budget lines or to go into details.
De tragiske begivenheder i Polen, som tidligere var en betydelig leverandør af kul til Fællesskabet, viser endnu en gang, hvor stor Fællesskabets sårbarhed er også med
We absolutely agreed with Mr Langes that the important thing was to get something to the Poles as quickly as possible in the way that they needed it.
hensyn til kulforsyningen, som vi jo anser for at være af væsentlig betydning og prioriterer højt.
Unemployment in the Community is growing rapidly and, within one year from 1980 to 1981, we had an increase in the order of 12-5% and today the number of unemployed is more than 10 million.