natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Endelig har uoverensstemmelserne mellem lovgivningen og indholdet af direktiv 75/268, som for eksempel den manglende fastsættelse af bestemmelser om kontrol med forpligtelsen til at udøve landbrugsvirksomed, den manglen de overholdelse af reglerne med hensyn til godtgørelsernes omfang og periodiske karakter, lovgivningens tidsmæssige begrænsning af foranstaltningen, i vidt omfang gjort det meget vanskeligt at nå de fastsatte mål.
The applicational effectiveness of the directive itself was lessened by the slowness in putting into effect the laws that were already passed; finally, the inconsistencies between the legislation and the content of Directive 75/268 — such as the failure to provide checks that farming was being carried on, the failure to observe the rules as regards the amounts and frequency of contributions, and the limitations on the longterm effectiveness of the legislation — very seriously hindered the achieve ment of the targets as set.
— det vil sige på indtil 10 ha brugbar landbrugsjord — tydeligt, at den politik, der føres, går ud over stater med en landbrugsstruktur, der indebærer mange små bedrifter med begrænset mekanisering og derfor med et større antal beskæftigede.
I can understand the anxiety of some Members of this House to discuss the Fontainebleau mechanism and to challenge whether it is appropriate under the Treaties, but the 1984 discharge report is not the appropriate place to deal with it, because it did not apply in 1984.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
All rates of taxation should be equal.
Tomlinson (S). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil gerne begynde med en kompliment for store dele af fru Scriveners betænkning, og jeg er sikker på, af hun ikke vil opfatte det som en uhøflighed, hvis jeg i ste det for at behandle betænkningen i almindelighed begrænser mine bemærkninger til to punkter.
I think it is a breach of the serious principle of equality of taxation that one Member State should be given a refund on the revenue side when there was a very easy way of providing a correction to any alleged or claimed imbalance — that is, on the expenditure side. It was totally unacceptable and contrary, I believe, to the letter and the spirit of the Treaties that any coun try should receive a refund on the revenue side.
Den peger dernæst på, at nogle af aktionerne i medlemsstaterne i kampen mod bedragerier i Fælles skabet har været utilstrækkelige.
They go on to point out the inadequacy of some of the operations in Member States in the fight against fraud in the Community.
Vi forventer, at Rådet tager disse bemærkninger alvorligt, og at det, når det kommer med sine bemærkninger til Revisionsrettens beretning, ligeledes tager den opgave alvorligt.
We expect the Council of Ministers to take those reports seriously and, when they give their observations on the Court of Auditors' report, to take that duty equally seriously.
Men hvad ser vi?
Yet what do we find?
Vi fik at vide, at der var brede drøftelser i Rådet. Vi fik endog at vide, at man brugte 11 dage i Rådet på at behandle det!
We were told there were extensive deliberations in the Council of Ministers; they even told us they spent 11 days in Council considering this!
Ja, hvis dette er produktet af 11 dages aktivitet i Rådet, er det ikke så sært, at Fællesskabet er i den situation, det er i!
Well, if this is the product of 11 days of Council activity, no wonder the Community is in the mess that it is!
I punkt 10 misbilliges den praksis, Fællesskabet i mod strid med traktaten anvender med at kompensere for en uacceptabel situation ved give rabat på indtægter.
I believe that when the expenditure of the Community is pushing up against the ceiling of available resources, we must be particularly careful that all revenue collectible is collected.
Kendsgerningen er ganske enkel i 1984, det år der her er tale om, blev der ikke på budgettets ind tægtsside behandlet nogen rabat for regnskabet 1984.
That is the property of the Comunity, and no Member State and not even the Council of Ministers has the authority to interfere with that revenue.
Rabatten for 1984 fulgte af topmødet i Stuttgart den 17.-19. juni 1983, og de relevante konti og beløb på 1984-budgettet for bruttokompensation var artikel 649: Beskæftigelse - 275 mio ECU, artikel 707 : Særlige energiforanstaltninger — 255 mio ECU, og artikel 783: Transport — 461 mio ECU.
But if a Member State and its staff, its officers, its secretariat, are less than efficient in the collection of that revenue, then it is the Community which suffers.
1985, Fontainebleau-mekanismen tråde i kraft, og 1985-budgettet indeholdt en momsrabat på 1 000 mio ECU med hensyn til 1984.
That is absolutely essential, and no Member State has the right to obstruct the efficiency of this Community in the collection of its own
Efter disse detaljerede kritikpunkter fra Revisionsretten var det eneste, Rådet kom med under overskriften »Bedragerier og urerelmæssigheder«, punkt 423429: »Rådet afviser Revisionsrettens bemærkninger om en vis ligegyldighed fra medlemsstaternes side«.
After those detailed criticsms from the Court of Auditors, all that the Council of Ministers came up with was under the heading 'Frauds and irregularities', paragraphs 423-429: 'The Council rebuts the Court of Auditors' remarks regarding a certain indifference on the part of Member States'.
Jeg spurgte rådsformanden, der deltog i budgetudvalgets møde : Hvilken af Revisionsrettens bemærk ninger afviser man og af hvilken årsag?
I asked the President-in-Office of the Council who attended the Committee on Budgets meeting: which one of the Court of Auditors' remarks did they rebut and for what reason?
Han kunne ikke føje noget til den omstændighed, at man afviste det.
He could add nothing to the fact that they rebutted them.
Jeg gav ham endnu en mulighed og spurgte ham i et meget mere enkelt engelsk, end jeg er vant til, hvilken del af punkt 423-429 det var, som Rådet var imod?
I gave him another opportunity, asking in even more simple English than that which I am usually accustomed to: which particular part of paragraphs 423-429 does the Council of Ministers object to?
Hvis det nemlig vender sig mod en af de andre fællesskabsinstitutioner og siger, at det afviser dens bemærkninger, har det en forpligtelse over for denne institution og over for Fællesskabets budget myndighed til at sige nøjagtig, hvorfor det gør det!
For if they turn round to one of our other Community institutions and say they rebut its comments, they have a duty to that institution and to the budgetary authority of the Com munity to tell us precisely why they so do!
Det har det på helt enestående vis undladt at gøre, og jeg mener, at det er en pligt for os som medlemmer af Parlamentet, som en af den fælles budgetmyndigheds to grene, at sige til Rådet — der glimrer ved sit fravær her i eftermiddag — at vi finder dets lunefulde hold ning over for den seriøse og konstruktive kritik fra Revisionsretten fuldstændig uacceptabel, og at den holdning ikke varsler godt for det, der burde være nære forbindelser mellem vore institutioner frem over!
That they have singularly failed to do, and I think it is obligatory on us as Members of this House, as one of the two arms of the joint budgetary authority, to say to the Council of Ministers — who are noticeable by their absence again this afternoon — that we find their cap ricious attitude to serious and constructive criticism from the Court of Auditors totally unacceptable and one which does not augur well for what ought to be close relations between our institutions in future!
Rabatten for 1984 blev først opført på budgettet på indtægtssiden i 1985. Jeg håber stadig, at fru Scrivener ud fra intellektuel hæderlighed vil tage dette punkt tilbage i betænkningen eller støtte forslaget om at slette det.
Most Members have given some thought to the expenditure side, so there is no need for me to dwell upon it, but I believe that we need to tighten up the whole system of collection of revenues so that from one end of the Community to another we have similar
Ryan (PPE). — (EN) Fru formand, jeg vil begynde med at give udtryk for min uenighed med hr. Tom linson i hans første bemærkning og min fulde støtte til hans sidste bemærkninger.
Mr Ryan (PPE). — Madam President, I will open by indicating to Mr Tomlinsion my disagreement with him on the first point he made and my total support for his latter remarks.
Ryan indtil hans udnævnelse, som vil blive behandlet af Parlamentet pa fredag i denne mødeperiode.
Ryan developments in the political situation in various areas more closely than has previously been the case.
uacceptabelt og efter min mening i modstrid med traktatens ord og ånd, at noget land modtager tilbagebetaling på indtægtssiden.
standards, similar levels of efficiency and a similar interpretation of the law.
(Bifald fra det europæiske folkepartis gruppe)
Mr Taylor (ED). — Madam President, just a brief point of order.
Selv om vi naturligvis vil savne ham. fremfor alt hvad kontrollen med indtægtssiden angår, så mener vi dog, at han i Revisionsretten vil være os en lige så god støtte — eventuelt med en egen beretning fra revisionsretten.
I believe that one can learn more from an annual report of this calibre by the Court of Auditors than by simply following the debates of this Parliament and its committees over a number of years.
Jeg vil ved afslutningen af denne debat som formand for budgetkontroludvalget takke alle ordførerne hjerteligt.
I am just sorry that he did not declare this interest before his speech.
Fru Scrivener har, det kan man vel sige. gjort sig utrolig megen umage med sin betænkning, og hun har forstået at føretraditionen videre fra vores ud valgs årsberetninger — hun har på værdig måde slut tet sig til hr. Prices sidste årsberetning — og alligevel hævde sin egen karakter og selv udvælge de vigtigste punkter.
President. — Mr Taylor, you know just as well as I do that Mr Ryan remains a full Member of this Parliament until his appointment, on which this Parliament will be giving its opinion during next Friday's sitting.
Først og fremmest har hun forbundet dem med en politisk betragtning.
(Applause from the Group of the European People's Party)
Jeg tror, at når Fællesskabets udgifter er ved at kom me op til loftet for disponible midler, skal vi være særlig påpasselige med, at alle de indtægter, der kan opkræves, også opkræves.
I should like to mention briefly the subjects which dominated all our committee's discussions with the Council, the Commission and the technical commit tees.
Vi har desværre grund til at tro — og dette støttes af Revisionsrettens beretning for 1984 og tidligere år — at vise lande er mindre effektive end andre til at opkræve indtægter.
Mr Christophersen, there has been much criticism of the implementation of the budget for 1984.
Det er Fællesskabets ejendom, og ingen medlemsstat og ikke en gang Rådet har beføjelse til at blande sig i disse indtægter.
The fact that we are now granting discharge does not mean that those criticisms were unfounded.
Men hvis en medlemsstat og dens personale, dens tjenestemænd, dens sekretariat, ikke er effektiv til at opkræve disse indtægter, så er det Fællesskabet, der lider tab.
But on the other hand — and this view is shared by a majority of us — the new Commission has taken such pains and cooperated so closely with us that we ought to pay tribute to that fact by saying so publicly here and now.
Det er absolut af afgørende betydning, og ingen medlems stat har ret til at vanskeliggøre Fællesskabets effekti-' vitet med hensyn til at opkræve de egne indtægter.
There has been an improvement in cooperation between the Committee on Budgetary Control and the Commission, and we are very grateful for it.
De bør benytte budgetkontroludvalget til bedre at følge den givne politiske situation på det ene eller det andet område, end det hidtil har været tilfældet.
Although of course we shall miss him, particularly in connection with monitoring the revenue side, we believe that he will be just as invaluable to us at the Court of Auditors — possibly in the context of an own-initiative report by the Court.
De fleste medlemmer har behandlet udgiftssiden, hvorfor der ikke er noget behov for, at jeg opholder mig ved den.
We need only look at the graphs for the last few years which the Court of Auditors has helpfully provided.
Men jeg mener, vi bør skærpe hele systemet med opkrævning af indtægter, så vi overalt i Fællesskabet har samme normer, samme grad af ef fektivitet og samme fortolkning af lovgivningen.
Since — unlike the Member States — the Comunity cannot be allowed to become indebted, the commitments into which the Community has entered are often deferred to subsequent years.
Men jeg vil også gerne takke Revisionsretten og dens tjenestemænd hjerteligt.
As chairman of the Committee on Budgetary Control, I should like to wind up this debate by thanking all the rapporteurs most sincerely.
Det er ikke helt let at kontrollere Det europæiske Fællesskab — med alle de vanskeligheder der opstår på de forskellige planer. Det ville bestemt være en stor fordel for hvert parlamentsmedlem, hvis han ikke blot gennembladede denne årsberetning, men også studerede den.
I think it can be said that Mrs Scrivener took immense trouble over her report, and succeeded in maintaining the traditional standard of our committee's annual reports — with her report providing a worthy successor to last year's by Mr Price — while nevertheless leaving her own stamp upon it and emphasizing her own particular priorities.
Taylor (ED). — (EN) Fru formand, til forretningsordenen.
I must also mention the many suggestions which emerged from the technical committees.
Men han er selvfølgelig endnu ikke blevet udnævnt formelt.
They should use the Committee on Budgetary Control to follow
Jeg beklager blot, at han ikke tilkendegav denne per sonlige interesse inden sit indlæg.
I once tried to work out the total amount of these past commitments on the basis of the cautious figures sup plied by the Commission, but also by the Permanent Representatives.
Hr. Christophersen, der er blevet rettet me gen kritik mod gennemførelsen af budgettet for 1984.
That means 14 000 million ECU that have yet to be paid!
At vi nu meddeler decharge, betyder jo ikke. at vores kritik har været overflødig.
Reimbursable advances to Member States come to another 1 000 million ECU.
Formanden. — Hr. Taylor, De ved bedre end jeg, at hr. Ryan forbliver fuldgyldigt medlem af Parlamentet
This adds up to a total of some 2022 000 million ECU in past commitments which will have to bè paid somehow over the next few years. We
Kommission udfoldet så store bestræbelser og har arbejdet så snævert sammen med os, at det bør honoreres, idet vi siger det offentligt her.
I understand Mr Tomlinson's attitude, but our committee decided by a large majority against deleting paragraph 10 because we believe that it is absolutely essential for the Com munity to have financial autonomy if it is to survive in the face of competing national interests.
Man kan konstatere en god udvikling i samarbejdet mellem budgetkontroludvalget og Kommissionen. Derfor udtaler vi vores hjertelige tak.
should, therefore, ask the Council how the Member States intend to construct Europe.
Alligevel bliver vi nødt til at konstatere, at Fællesskabets indtægter og udgifter selv med Kommissionens bedste vilje ikke længere kan bringes i overensstemmelse med de nu værende instrumenter.
Do they really believe that they can embark on the great adventure of unifying a continent and restoring its powers of action in all fields with a mere 1.4%, 1.6% or even 2% of VAT proceeds?
Der er dog ikke længere nogen politik!
That is an illusion!
Her må man da virkelig spørge sig selv,hvad der egentlig skal blive af Europa.
We must ask our governments what they really want.
Vi bør, selv om det volder Rådet, De faste Repræsentanter og medlemsstaterne med deres suverænitetsforestillinger vanskeligheder, styrke Kommissionen i dens beføjelser og ikke svække den.
Do they really want Europe, or would they prefer to go on making empty speeches while trying to shift their domestic problems on to the European level?
I vores udvalg har vi forsøgt i det mindste at trænge de nationale strukturers indflydelse noget tilbage.
Meanwhile the European Parliament's budgetary powers have degenerated into a farce, to put it bluntly.
Cirka 600 studie- og arbejdsgrupper samt udvalg med nationale eksperter blokerer hver uge i Bruxelles be slutningsprocessen.
The Committee on Budgets fights for weeks and months over particular issues.
Med en betænkning fra vores ud valg kunne vi bevirke, at det nu er ca. hundrede færre. Men det for store antal viderebestående udvalg og studiegrupper blokerer simpelt hen beslutningsprocessen.
But when we come to examine the implementation of the budget two years later, we see that it bears no relation to what was sup posed to happen.
Jeg benægter ikke, at vi har brug for at ud veksle erfaringer med medlemsstaterne, men det bør ikke varigt svække Kommissionens beslutningsmuligheder. heder.
If the Court further restricts Parliament's already negligible budg etary powers, it will be a catastrophe for the Com munity as a whole.
Jeg har forsøgt ved hjælp af Kommissionens samt De faste Repræsentanters forsigtige tal at regne fortidens byrder sammen.
I have observed over the past few decades that all governments — not excepting my own — claim the credit for anything positive achieved by cooperation in Europe.
Derved kommer jeg til en skræmmende sum.
But the Community is held responsible for any mistakes.
Strukturfondens forpligtelser beløber sig til slutningen af dette år til 14 mia ECU.
Let us consider how much the Com munity is costing us by virtue of the fact that it is not yet fully operational.
Det er 14 mia ECU, der ikke er betalt!
The relevant information is already available.
Af tilbagebetalbare for skud til medlemsstaterne kommer yderligere 1 mia ECU dertil.
It costs the European taxpayer at least 100 000 million ECU a year.
Dermed er vi oppe på 15 mia ECU. Når jeg meget, meget forsigtigt betragter de potentielle tab på lagrene i landbrugssektoren, kommer jeg mindst — og så må der ikke ske noget med dollaren ! — til en yderligere belastning på 57 mia ECU.
Think how much we could achieve with that sum in the field of integration policy!
Det betyder i det hele, at fortidens byrder andrager 20-22 mia ECU, der på en eller anden måde skal betales i de kommende år.
It is hardly surprising that we have problems getting public opinion on our side!
I næsten alle indlæg blev det med rette kritiseret, at Fællesskabets finansielle autonomi ikke længere eksisterer.
So if an insoluble con flict arises between the two arms of the budgetary authority because one of them wishes to have the whip hand over the other, our responsibility for the final say compels us to reach a decision.
Jeg forstår ganske vist hr. Tomlinson, men vores udvalg har med stort flertal nægtet at stryge punkt 10.
This is what the authors of the Treaties of Rome intended, or they would not have given Parliament the last word.
Derfor bør vi rette det spørgsmål til Rådet, hvordan medlemsstaterne egentlig vil opbygge Europa. Tror de virkelig, at de med en momsandel på 1,4%, 1,6% eller måske 2% skulle kunne fuldbyrde det dristige foretagende at forene et kontinent og genvinde handlefriheden på alle områder? Det er da en illusion!
To take only one example, how can the policy-makers expect to be taken seriously when, after giving the go-ahead to one of the most interesting research pro jects involving new technologies and new materials, the funds allocated to it are less than those provided to clean the Parliament building in Brussels?
Vi bør spørge vores regeringer, hvad det egentlig er, de vil.
Here we really have to ask our selves where Europe is supposed to be heading.
Vil de virkelig Europa, eller vil de stadig bare holde søndagstaler og skubbe deres interne problemer over på det europæiske plan?
We must strengthen, not weaken, the Commission's decision-making powers, however many problems that might create for the Council, the Permanent Representatives and the Member States with their various notions of sovereignty.
Europa-Parlamentets budgetmyndighed har imidlertid udviklet sig til en farce — jeg må sige det så skarpt.
Without wishing to go into the details of the conciliation procedure now, I should like to give you an idea of the atmosphere in which it was conducted.
Men når man så efter to års forløb betragter gennemførelsen af budgettet, så er der ikke længere nogen identitet mellem »bør« og »er«.
He went on: 'I am quite prepared to pay for my meal, but God knows that we shan't solve our problems by my paying for the hosts' dinner too!'
Nu blev Parlamentet oven i købet indklaget for Domstolen!
(Applause from the centre and the right)
Men hvad der er blevet gjort forkert, det bliver Fællesskabet gjort ansvar ligt for!
We in our committee have tried to curtail, at least to some extent, the influence of national bodies.
Lad os se på, hvad Fællesskabet koster os, fordi det endnu ikke er funktionsdygtigt.
Some 600 study or working groups and committees of national experts are blocking the decision-making pro cess in Brussels week by week.
Det fremgår af undersøgelser.
A report by our com mittee has now achieved a reduction of 100 or so in their number.
Det koster den europæiske skatteyder mindst 100 mia ECU om året. Hvilken integrationspolitik kunne man ikke føre for de penge!
But the excessive number of committees and study groups still in existence is simply blocking the decision-making process.
Men alt det gode, der er realiseret her, det har medlems staterne æren for, og alt det, der er gået skævt, det giver man Det europæiske Fællesskab skylden for — omtrent i overensstemmelse med det Grimm'ske
I recognize the need to share and exchange experience with the Member States, but that should not permanently weaken the Commission's decision-making powers.
Romtraktaternes fædre har givet Parlamentet an svaret for det sidste ord.
I shall now briefly turn to the question of financial autonomy.
Men hvis der nu er en konflikt mellem budgetmyndighedens to dele og den ikke
Almost all speakers have — quite rightly — made the point that the Community no longer enjoys
Aigner venhed, men blot markerer en udvikling, som forløber gennem hele året.
Christophersen place. I cannot help casting my mind back to the debate held in Parliament a year ago when we discussed the resolution on discharge for 1983.
kan løses, fordi den ene del vil beholde magten over den anden, så kan vi dog absolut ikke handle på anden måde end ud fra vores ansvar ved at have det sidste ord at træffe en afgørelse.
of speakers wanted it understood that, while Parliament might be ready to vote for discharge this year, that did not automatically mean that it would do so next year or again the year after.
Det var det, Romtraktaternes fædre ville, ellers havde de ikke givet Parlamentet det sidste ord.
I fully understand what may lie behind such comments, and the Commission is prepared to assume its responsibility and take the risk.
Hr. Christophersen, hav de vi ikke underskrevet budgettet, og havde De efter sidste års tolvtedelsordning ikke kunnet overkomme Fællesskabets udvidelse med Spanien og Portugal, så ville Fællesskabet ikke længere have været troværdigt.
Thus I think it was of great value to have introduced, as we did after last year's debate, the rule that the Commission should prepare an interim report detailing the improvements we undertake after the discharge debate, and the first of those reports was issued in September last year.
Med vores ansvar for det sidste ord har vi egentlig overhovedet muliggjort Rådets beslutning.
In similar fashion, the Commission will prepare an interim report on the basis of this year's discharge debate.
Kun på den måde kunne Fællesskabet overhovedet blive ud videt.
Thus in a month's time — simultaneously with the presentation of the accounts for the last budget year — there will be the final report on how we have sought to follow up the recommendations contained in last year's discharge resolution.
Det betyder også, at vi ved denne lejlighed ikke behøver at diskutere nogle meget konkrete enkeltproblemer.
It also means that we do not need on this occasion to discuss quite specific individual problems.