natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hr. formand, til sidst vil jeg udtrykke ønske om, at der vil ske et lille skridt, der bringer borgerne nærme re til Europa og Fællesskabets institutioner nærmere til borgerne.
So at present we have not only a tax impeding the founding of new companies within the European Community but also different rules.
Fitzgerald (RDE). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne komme med en kort tak til ordføreren, hr. Cassiy, da jeg glemte at takke ham.
Enough I hope! That same year the state paid out 18 000 million in subsidies to these two hundred large undertakings, i.e. the large undertakings receive more from the state than they pay in taxes!
Samtidig vil jeg gerne ønske den nye kommissær, lord Cockfield al mulig held fremover i hans nye hverv!
That is why the committee decided by a large majority to call for the abolition of this tax.
Det andet forslag om, at de tilladte mængder skulle forhøjes til 150 ECU, rejser imidlertid betydelige pro blemer.
Now this report does not just confine itself to harmonizing these taxes — something we often have to do, of course, and unfortunately often do in a way which the ordinary people cannot understand because we want to or have to go into too much detail about what is harmonized in the European Community and how and why it is done.
Det har hidtil været Fællesskabets politik, at de tilladte mængder fra tredjelande og inden for Fæl lesskabet skulle stige parallelt.
In this case, however, we can see a positive trend, since we are concerned not with harmonising these taxes but in fact with abolishing them.
Selv den sam lede forhøjelse, som Kommissionen foreslog i det sjette direktiv - fra 210 til 400 ECU - udgør en forhøjelse på ca. 90%.
Where a half percent tax is required, it can and should be reduced to zero; where one percent is required, to half a percent.
En sådan uforholdsmæssig forhøjelse, som det foreslås i Cassidy-betænkningen, ville stride imod princippet om fællesskabspræferencen og gå imod de bestræbelser, der er blevet gjort for at styrke det indre marked.
So in those countries which cannot bring themselves to accept total abolition, the tax should be reduced.
Det ville resultere i, at import fra tredjelande blev begunstiget på bekostning af fællesskabsproducenterne uden nogen modsvarende fordel for Fællesskabets eksport eller for Fælleskabets borgere.
Secondly it endorses the Commission proposal that those Com munity countries which are prepared to abolish this tax totally may do so, indeed ought to do so.
Lord Cockfield, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, først vil jeg gerne rette en tak til alle de medlemmer af Parlamentet, som har ønsket mig held og lykke.
May I point out that in the Federal Republic of Ger many, for example, a tax on sparkling wines was introduced before the First World War to finance the imperial navy for the attack on the United Kingdom.
Den blev forelagt af hr. Cassidy på en både oplysende og konstruktiv måde.
However, I have also heard from Luxembourg that this tax hinders the founding of undertakings and that efforts are being made in Luxembourg too to abolish it.
Der var nogle talere, som måske gik lidt videre end Cassidy-betænkningen, og jeg håber derfor, at man vil tilgive mig, at jeg ikke kommenterer dette, men begrænser mig til at sige, at jeg omhyggeligt har noteret mig, hvad der blev sagt.
The amend ments tabled to my report specify a date. As rapporteur for my committee I must say: I stand by the text which the majority of this committee adopted and which requests only that this tax should be abolished in the near future throughout the European Com munity.
Hvad selve indholdet af betænkningen angår, må for slaget til et ottende direktiv om tilladte mængder for
In its proposal the Commission also refrained from saying that this tax had to be abolished by 1 January 1988 or 1989.
Jeg er ikke desto mindre fuldt ud klar over, hvilke vægtige argumenter, der er blevet fremført her i for middag.
So we now propose abolishing this tax on the raising of capital, for the trend towards reducing taxes is a necessary and a just one.
Jeg er villig til at tænke yderligere over sagen i lyset af det, der er blevet sagt.
Only yesterday somebody here brought up the notion of a planned economy again, which made my hair stand on end.
Vi bør dele hans vision om et Fæl lesskab helt uden indre skranker.
So if the state wants to give the citizen a DM 100 benefit, it will have to collect DM 200 from him to finance it.
Vi ønsker alle at arbejde henimod dette, men det er vist noget, som er mere langsigtet end indholdet af den foreliggende be tænkning.
There is a unanimous move towards the abolition of this tax and I therefore ask the Assembly to endorse the committee's report.
Lord Cockfield, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg vil blot sige, at jeg omhyggeligt har noteret mig hr. Rogallas udtalelser.
Mr Mühlen (PPE). — (FR) Mr President, although, on the whole, I agree with the conclusions of Mr Ingo Friedrich's excellent report, I should like to make a few comments and stress certain points.
Formanden. — Forhandlingen er afsluttet.
Mr von der Vring (S). — (DE) Mr President, could you not call the committee rapporteur?
Jeg henstiller derfor til, at man tiltræder dette forslag, så den nuværende situation straks kan blive forbedret.
So far we have only heard the rapporteur for the small and mediumsized undertakings!
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er be tænkning (dok.
We examine every aspect of industrial, economic and fiscal policy to see what social effect it will have.
21342/84) af Ingo Friedrich for ud valget for økonomi, valuataspørgsmål og industripolitik over forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet til direktiv om ændring af direktiv 69/335/EØF om kapitaltilførselsafgifter (dok. 2685/84 - KOM (84) 403 endel.)
The directive now before us, like the next item on the agenda — the directive on tax arrangements for the carryover of losses of undertakings, the subject of Mr Abelin's report — concerns the harmonization of taxes on undertakings.
Må jeg komme ind på det særlige punkt, der blev rejst af hr. Selva vedrørende moms på fodtøj i Italien.
Although I am in favour of completely abolishing the tax on raising capital, I feel that we should be careful not to act precipitiously.
På det nuværende harmoniseringsstadium inden for merværdilovgivningen henhører det udelukkende under medlemsstaterne af fastsætte momsniveauet.
In fact, we should not lose sight of the fact that there are other more serious restrictions on the free circulation of capital and that we should begin by tackling these restrictions.
Kommissionen har ikke beføjelser til at gribe ind på dette særlige område, undtagen for at sikre at den nationale lovgivning er i overensstemmelse med artikel 95 i traktaten.
It would be a mistake to believe that free circulation of capital can be brought about by tax harmonization measures such as those which we are currently dealing with without simultaneously making persistent efforts to bring about the parallel elimination of the real barriers to free circulation of capital which arise, for example, in the area of exchange controls.
Anvendelsen i Italien af forskellige momssatser for fodtøj og beklædning er ikke i strid med disse særlige bestemmelser.
In other words, we must move forward simultaneously on both fronts.
Vi hilser det selv følgelig velkommen, at den italienske regering for nylig har taget skridt til at reducere antallet af moms satser, men yderligere fremskridt på dette særlige om råde henhører under den italienske regeringskompetence og ikke under Kommissionen.
In this context I should like to point out that these restrictions are a serious hindrance to the free circulation of capital and that their abolition, together with the authorization of the free use of the ECU in transactions between individuals is a precondition for monetary union.
Undskyld mig en personlig bemærkning: min kone går altid med italienske sko, så jeg har virkelig megen sympati for hans synspunkt.
With regard to the tax on the raising of capital, it should clearly not be forgotten that two countries, the Netherlands and Luxembourg, still impose a 1% tax.
Men hvis jeg må komme tilbage til hovedspørgsmålet i Cassidy-betænkningen, vil jeg gerne anmode med lemmerne om at tilslutte sig den af mig anførte frem gangsmåde.
In view of the importance of company formation for my own country, Luxembourg, and, in particular, the relatively high rate of 1%, if the tax on the raising of capital were to be abolished in the short-term, Luxembourg would experience budgetary difficulties which could not be offset by corresponding advantages in real terms.
I. Friedrich (PPE), ordfører. - (DE) Hr. formand, i denne betænkning om indirekte afgifterer der tale om en afgift, der er relativ ubekendt.
Until the end of 1984 the Belgian authorities also imposed a time-limit in the case of limited liability companies, which meant that the tax could be levied on the same capital every 30 years.
Den erlægges ved oprettelse af virksomheder.
However, this arrangement has been superseded by the new legislation on trading companies.
I betænkningen og i kom missionsforslaget kaldes det hele »indirekte afgifter på kapitaltilførsler«.
But this tax is not being harmonized because that would result in its introduction in Member States, including Belgium, which are absolutely opposed to property taxes.
Det betyder, at hvis en modig EF-borger opretter en virksomhed i dag, kan han af staten tvinges til — ordningen er relativ forskellig i de enkelte EF-lande — at betale mellem en halv og en hel procent af kapitaldannelsen til staten.
Consequently, in Member States which do not levy property taxes, this directive will give rise to what is known as a mortmain.
Jeg behøver ikke at henvise til, at en sådan afgift naturligvis ikke fremmer dannelsen af egenkapital og risikovillig kapital og således oprettelse af virksomheder, men snarere virket som en hindring og en vanskelighed.
While the assets of a natural person are liable to estate duties once per generation, at the time of his death, the assets of a legal person, once introduced into a company, will never be taxed again.
Vi har altså for øjeblikket i Det europæiske Fællesskab ikke blot en afgift, der således hæmmer oprettelsen af nye virksomheder, men også forskellige bestemmelser.
This concession to undertakings will thus result in a reduction of public revenue but will not be accompanied by a social policy measure of any kind.
Må jeg, hr. formand, gennem Dem sige ham tak for hans store hjælp?
Therefore the Commission was wise to refrain from fixing here and now a time limit for the definitive abolition of this tax.
I det foreliggende tilfælde skal der imidlertid for så vidt redegøres for en positiv udvikling, da det ikke blot drejer sig om harmonisering af disse afgifter, men endog om deres afskaffelse.
Two different methods are thus applied in the European Community: the collection of a 1% tax when the capital is raised, possibly combined with a certain time-limit on the company, and the collection of a property tax.
Det er i sig selv meget sjældent, at et statsligt organ foreslår afskaffelse af en afgift.
We are in favour of fiscal harmonization, but why should it be aimed solely at improving the climate for undertakings?
I regelen er det mod satte tilfældet.
Why abolish tax on the raising of capital without making the property tax the general rule?
Rogalla(S). — (DE) Hr. formand, jeg vil gerne bede Dem undtagelsesvis give mig lov til at stille lord Cockfield et spørgsmål efter hans jomfrutale. Er han sig bevidst, at Kommissionens politik om at øge de tilladte mængder for indførsel fra tredjelande parallelt med mængderne for det indre marked, er en af de slyngplanter, som jeg har advaret ham alvorligt imod?
Mr Patterson (ED). — I begin by welcoming Mr Friedrich's report and his speech — more his speech than his report, I may say — and also the proposal made in the draft directive, while observing that both the report and the draft directive suffer from a certain
Til al held er disse tider forbi, men afgiften på sekt findes stadig væk i Tyskland, og jeg befrygter, at den også vi findes om hundrede år.
We Socialists will recommend the rejection of the directive because it will deharmonize an area of Com munity law that is now harmonized.
Vi foreslår altså nu, at denne afgift på kapitaldannelser afskaffes, for tendensen til færre afgifter er nødvendig og rigtig.
We are concerned here with amend ing a directive of 1969 which requires Member States to impose a 1% tax on the raising of capital by com panies.
Netop i går var der atter en, der opkastede begrebet planøkonomi her, og det var, så hårene rejste sig på mit hoved!
Now what the Commission now thinks of this tax is admirably expressed in paragraph 2 of their own explanatory memorandum, where it felt 'that there was no longer any room for such a tax in a rational tax system'.
Den, der via omfordeling og staten som den store velgører forventer, at vore vanskeligheder bliver løst, han er galt afmarcheret!
Quite! It goes on in the text of the directive to say — and here Mrs Van Hemeldonck and the Social ist Group please note:
Hvis staten vil gøre borgeren en velgerning til 100 DM, må den indkassere 200 DM hos borgeren til finansiering heraf.
Whereas the economic effects of capital duty are detrimental to the regrouping and development of undertakings.
På den anden side har jeg også hørt i Luxembourg, at dette vanskeliggør oprettelsen af virksomheder, og at der også i Luxembourg er bestræbelser for at afskaffe denne afgift.
For example, it provides for the exemption of those public services which pursue cultural, charitable, relief or educational objectives.
De foreliggende ændringsforslag til min betænkning indeholder en sådan konkret dato.
It has been pointed out that, for example, in the United Kingdom, not all cultural organizations are classified as charities.
Som ordfører for udvalget må jeg sige : jeg bliver ved den tekst, som udvalgets flertal har vedtaget, og hvori det kun kræves, at denne afgift snart afskaf fes i hele Det europæiske Fællesskab.
The British Government, therefore, con cludes that it is doubtful whether the complication of specific exemptions would be justified.
Også Kommissionen har i sit forslag givet afkald på at sige : inden den 1. januar 1988 eller 1989 må denne afgift være afskaffet.
I am very anxious to hear from the Commissioner, therefore, how he believes that the administrative problems of separating those areas where exemption is mandatory and those areas where it is not, is to be solved.
Tendensen er klart for afskaffelse af denne afgift, og jeg beder derfor Parlamentet om at tiltræde udvalgets betænkning.
Whereas such effects are particularly harmful in the present economic situation, in which there is a paramount need for priority to be given to stimulating investment.
von der Vring (S). — (DE) Hr. formand, kunne De ikke give ordet til udvalgets ordfører?
In other words, Mrs Van Hemeldonck, this tax creates unemployment, and I say, quite!
Hidtil har vi kun hørt middelstandens ordfører!
So what is the Com mission's conclusion?
Det er desværre sandheden, selv om den er ilde hørt. Hele verden taler i dag om økonomisk genopsving.
The Commission correctly notes that this will cost some money.
Dette sker ikke ved hjælp af afgifter eller konjunkturprogrammer, men derimod ved hjælp af private initiativer, de mange små og mellemstore virksomheder og kun på denne måde.
My group believes that the Commission and, indeed, the rapporteur in his speech, has made out the case for abolishing this tax on economic grounds, on grounds of the internal market and on administrative grounds.
Derfor er kravet om afskaf felse af denne afgift en gavnlig og nyttig sag til glæde for middelstanden og de små og mellemstore firmaer og virksomheder, og det bidrager til oprettelse af ny arbejdspladser.
In paragraph 6, the motion says that the Parliament is 'in favour of abolishing indirect taxes on the raising of capital in the near future'. My group is suspicious of phrases like 'in the near future'.
Det vil vi være med til at sætte gang i.
If you do not set targets in this business, nothing ever gets done.
Hvad angår fordeling af skatter og afgifter må man også vide, og det må jeg sige til mine venner til højre for mig: ifølge en analyse, der er offentliggjort i Tysk land, har de to hundrede største virksomheder i år betalt 16 mia i skatter og afgifter.
The objective of facilitating the contribution of risk capital to firms must in the current economic situation take precedence over that of maintaining the tax revenue generated by capital duty, the yield from which is, in any case, small in relation to the total tax revenues.
Alle punkter vedrørende industriel og økonomisk politik samt skatte- og afgiftspolitik bedømmer vi først med hensyn til deres sociale virkning.
Lord Cockfield, as a former employee of Her Majesty's Inland Revenue — I think I am right in say ing this — will appreciate all that.
Det direktiv, der nu foreligger, ligesom det næste punkt på dagsordenen, nemlig direktivet om virksomheders overførsel af underskud, som hr. Abelins betænkning vedrører, sigter mod en harmonisering af beskatningen for virksomheder.
So it is very clear to me that the Commission in its text has made out the case and would like to abolish this tax; but, unfortunately, it has lacked in some respects the courage of its convictions.
Begge går ud på at gøre det noget lettere for virksomhederne.
We are in a half-way house, and here it has produced some problems.
Dette direktiv sig ter mod gradvis afskaffelse af beskatningen fra maksimum 1 %, som nogle medlemsstater pålægger kapitaltilførsler ved oprettelse af et handelsselskab.
The directive allows Member States to abolish this tax but it does not make it mandatory, and this does not, in my opinion, accord with the object of minimizing obstacles to the development and functioning of the capital market.
Denne beskatning bliver imidlertid ikke harmoniseret, for det ville betyde en udvidelse af den til også at gælde i medlemsstater, som absolut er imod en formuebeskatning, bl.a. Belgien.
We know how necessary it is that there should be freedom of move ment across frontiers, not just for persons and services but also for capital.
Følgen er, at dette direktiv i de medlemsstater, hvor der ikke findes formuebeskatning, skaber en såkaldt »død
At just this time, when we know how great is the need for new thinking and for research into new technology, for the development of new products, for ventures to meet the competition on world markets, when we know that we have such advances to catch up on, both in the United States and in Japan, it is also necessary to create real possibilities for the raising of risk-bearing capital.
Forhåbentlig tilstrækkeligt! Samme år gav staten disse 200 store virksomheder 18 mia i form af støtte, dvs. at de store virksomheder indkasserer mere fra staten, end de betaler i skat!
points out that the flow of capital and the com mon market would be perceptibly disturbed if cer tain Member States were to abolish these taxes while others retained a tax of 1% is entirely borne out.
De vigtigste bidragsydere til staten og samfundet er de små og mellemstore virksomheder, og derfor bør vi fremme og hjælpe dem.
We are after all, are we not, all in favour of creating a common market in goods, services, people and capital.
Derfor har udvalget med stort flertal vedtaget dette krav om afskaffelse af den ne afgift.
There is one further obstacle it has created — and here I have some specific questions to put to the Com
I betænkningen hedder det for det første: udvalget kræver en nedsættelse af afgiften.
Much is said about the availability of risk-bearing cap ital, in the individual Member States too.
Der, hvor der kræves en halv procent, kan og bør den reduceres til nul og der, hvor der kræves en procent, til en halv procent.
In some countries it is to be had, in others not.
I de lande, der endnu ikke har kunnet gen nemføre en fuldstændig afskaffelse, skal der altså ske en nedsættelse af afgiften. For det andet kræver ud valget — og heri støtter det Kommissionen — at de EF-lande, der er rede til helt at afskaffe denne afgift, kan gøre dette, ja de opfordres endog hertil.
But the moment the taxes are abolished and capital becomes free to migrate across the Community's internal frontiers, we shall have taken a very important step towards a con ception and a realization of the Community as a large unified common market, in which capital can be
Van Hemeldonck landet, dersom kapitaltilførselsafgiften afskaffes, hurtigt komme ud for budgetmæssige vanskeligheder, der ikke opvejes af tilsvarende reelle fordele.
Tove Nielsen invested in those businesses which afford the best prospects for the manufacture of products in which there is a future.
Over for denne gave til virksomheden står altså en formindskelse af statens indtægter og på den anden side ikke nogen som helst socialpolitisk foran staltning.
posed to show us the way out of the crisis and lead towards full employment and prosperity; but this thoughtless and biassed assertion cannot stand up to the most superficial examination!
Netop af den grund mener jeg, at det er på sin plads at fare med lempe.
This method of resolving the crisis will not work.
I EF er der således to forskellige teknikker : kapitaltilførselsafgift på 1 %, eventuelt kombineret med en vis tidsgrænse for handelsselskabet, og på den anden side formuebeskatning.
The capital only accumulates in the form of capital expend iture on extension (and not on rationalization, which destroys rather than creates jobs) if new markets offer hopes of new profits.
Vi går ind for harmonisering af skatter og afgifter, men hvorfor kun i retning af et bedre klima for virksomheder?
But the new growth trends are not yet perceptible — or pose a threat.
Hvorfor afskaffelse af kapitaltilførselsafgifter uden at gøre formuebeskatning almen?
The tax benefits to improve capital profits only finance further rationalization projects — if they do not flow into speculation deals, i.e. are invested at all.
Disse to bemærkninger fortjener at blive taget i be tragtning, hr. formand, ved vurderingen af dette di rektivforslag.
So this only exacerbates the problems of mass unemployment and thus of the new poverty and split in European society.
Mühlen (PPE). - (FR) Hr. formand, selv om jeg i det store og hele kan tilslutte mig konklusionerne i hr. Friedrichs glimrende betænkning, vil jeg alligevel tillade mig at fremsætte et par bemærkninger og understrege nogle forhold.
It is not the farmers, who have to live off the proceeds of their own work, who are supported by these measures, but those growth industries which bow to the profit strategies of the agricultural machinery producers, the chemical industries and the agricultural multinationals.
Patterson (ED). — (EN) Jeg vil begynde med at takke for hr. Friedrichs betænkning og hans forelæggelse — mere for hans forelæggelse end for hans betænkning, må jeg sige — og også for forslagene i direktivforslaget, idet jeg skal bemærke, at både betænkningen og direktivforslaget lider under en vis mangel på mod.
May I say — and this is also for the ears of the social ists, who in my view have a very warped understand ing of what it means to secure the abolition of taxes on capital and hence create good conditions for the injection of investment into firms and into jobs — that it is precisely by this means that we can make a very sub stantial contribution to the process of working our selves out of the unhappy situation we are now in, with far too many unemployed.
Vi har her at gøre med en ændring af et direktiv fra 1969, som kræver, at medlemsstaterne skal lægge en 1 % afgift på selskabers kapitaltilførsler.
We must indeed abolish unemployment, which in turn means that we must create new, durable jobs, and we cannot do that unless we also create better conditions under which businesses can raise capital.
Hvad Kom missionen nu mener om denne afgift, kommer glimrende til udtryk i punkt 2 i dens begrundelse, hvor det hedder, at den fandt, at denne afgift ikke længere var berettiget i et rationelt skattesystem.
Europe is full of dynamic people who want to create something new, to make their contribution to a better future for us all.