natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvad angår de mennesker — og hr. Bangemann hører til dem — som kritiserer de folk, der har lagt en taktik her i Parlamentet, så synes jeg, at hans kritik er forkert anbragt, selv om jeg forstår hans bekymring. Dette Parlament har, som troldmandens lærling, lært sin taktik af Ministerrådet.
Madam President, I conclude with my personal thanks and the thanks of my group to Mr Adonnino, who has coped manfully with a very difficult task.
Hvis man står med bare 45 mio. RE'og 24 timer til at tage endelig stilling til hele budgettet, hvad kan man så gøre? Gå til sin gruppe og sige: vi har kun 45 mio., hvad vil I have? og så forvente, at det er i overensstemmelse med de øvrige gruppers prioritering?
I have in mind Sir Fred Warner and Stanley Johnson, both of whom have made known their considerable disappointment after many weeks, if not months, of work in proposing amendments to the budget and finding them part of a larger disappointing scheme of things, finding themselves frustrated through no want of their own preparation.
Den måde, hver enkelt gruppe vil bruge de 45 mio. på, vil være anderledes end de andres.
President. — I call Mr Chambeiron to speak on behalf of the Communist and Allies Group.
Der er derfor her i Parlamentet i dag blevet benyttet taktik, da vi véd, at det var af enorm stor betydning at få 1981budgettet igennem; vi véd at Parlamentet er ustadigt, vi ved, at tallene svinger og at flertal samles på uberegnelig vis.
If there is to be blame apportioned for this — and no doubt many Members of this House feel in that kind of mood — then they can blame the Council, they can blame the system, they can blame the conciliation procedure if they like.
En ansvarsbevidst gruppe i Parlamentet besluttede, at 1981budgettet skulle igennem, og at den måtte udøve en dæmpende indflydelse.
This Parliament should learn its lesson that it is no good running a conciliation system to the very last minute of the budgetary process.
Det er i øvrigt i denne forbindelse, vi havde indgivet en række ændringsforslag, som er blevet afvist, hvilket forklarer, at vi har indgivet dette forslag til forkastelse af budgettet.
I was also wondering whether Mr Adonnino, after all the speeches I have just heard, was not going to be the only person to vote in favour of his own motion for a resolution...
Fru formand, mulighederne må nu søges i tillægs budget nr. 2, og vi agter at udnytte dem.
Fortunately, our British fellow Member gave him some support and as a result I am now in an easier position.
Det tager jeg til efterretning.
That is no conciliation.
Det er nemlig en simpel forlængelse af den politik, vi gjorde indsigelser imod i 1980, da vi stemte mod hr. Dankerts forslag.
We should be better off without conciliation if that is what we are going to have.
Hr. Santer bør meddele Rådet, at vi er i vor fulde ret med hensyn til tillægsbudgettet for 1980. Dermed har vi vor margen på vore ekstra 30 mio. for 1981.
This Parliament has learnt its tactics, like a sorcerer's apprentice, from the Council of Ministers.
Lad os få budgettet igennem og lad os afslutte dette år med en vis sans for disciplin.
Go to your group and say we have only 45 m, what do you want, and then expect it to be consistent with the priorities of the other groups?
Fru formand, jeg afslutter med min personlige og min gruppes tak til hr. Adonnino, som tappert har klaret en meget vanskelig opgave.
I should simply and very briefly like to explain the reasons why the French Communists and their Allies will vote against the motion tabled by Mr Adonnino.
Forskellen er, at de tilkendegivelser af utilfredshed, der er fremkommet, navnlig blandt landbrugere, i år har tvunget flertallet til at optræde mere forsigtigt.
The policies behind this text are exactly the same as those which caused us to table a motion for rejecting the budget, which my friend Mr Martin spoke about this morning.
Vi havde ret i går: der er ingen grund til, at vi ændrer holdning. Vi vil altså stemme mod det forslag til beslutning, der er forelagt af hr. Adonnino.
Mr Martin was right in denouncing these, in particular when it comes to calling into question the common agricultural policy.
Formanden. — Hr. Chambeiron har ordet gruppen af kommunister og beslægtede.
That way lies an overbidding of the budget — inevitably, because the priorities of the individual groups will not match.
Fru formand, det er heldigt, at hr. Taylor tog ordet før mig, for jeg spurgte mig selv, hvad jeg mon kunne sige af nyt.
So we overbid the budget and we do not have a budget, and then we are called irresponsible.
Jeg spurgte også mig selv, om hr. Adonnino efter alle de taler, jeg havde hørt, ikke ville blive ene om at stemme for sit eget forslag til beslutning.
So tactics have been employed in this House today where we knew it was enormously important to get the 1981 budget through: we know that this House is volatile, we know that the numbers perform unevenly and majorities are erratically assembled.
Heldigvis er jeg nu bedre stillet efter at vor britiske kollega har tilsagt ham sin støtte.
One responsible group of this Parliament decided that the 1981 budget was going to go through and that it had to act as a restraining influence.
Bonde. — Fru formand, vi har så endnu en gang fået et eksempel på forsamlingens revolverpolitik mod.
Madam President, the opportunities now lie in supplementary budget No 2 and we shall use them.
Rådet.
I say this
Det har forsamlingen ikke gjort, og derfor må vi opfordre Rådet til at fastslå, at det er Rådets sidste tilbud, som står ved magt. Forsamlingens ændringsforslag er ugyldige efter traktaten.
By so acting, the majority in this House is going beyond the powers it was granted by the budget treaties of 1970 and 1975, which we want to see observed.
Men det er bare et nyt eksempel på, at forsamlingen forsøger at tilkæmpe sig mere magt over penge pungen i EF.
It was with this in mind that we tabled some amendments which were rejected and which led to our tabling a motion for rejecting the budget.
Bonde afspejling af, tror jeg der er grund til at tro, at én af denne forsamlings svagheder er at foretage sig noget eller lade tingene ske uden at tage til genmæle.
Chambeiron the appropriate deeds and seek ways and means of making policy on food aid more effective.
hvad var baggrunden for tillægsbudgettet?
President. — I call Mr Brøndlund Nielsen on a point of order.
I Danmark vil det betyde en ekstra skatteudskrivning på 70 mio. DKr, og det i en tid hvor man seriøst overvejer at indføre afgifter på recepter til de syge mennesker.
In short, I merely wish to say that Mr Adonnino, in his motion, is continuing the budget policy pursued by Parliament since 1980.1 should like to make this plain.
Det jord skælv, der var i Italien, har nu vist sig også at bringe rystelser til den danske statskasse.
This is no more than a straight continuation of the policy we opposed in 1980 when we voted against Mr Dankert's motion.
Så det er klart, fru formand, at Folkebevægelsen vil stemme imod Adon-nino-betænkningen, og vi vil sige til Rådet: betragt Parlamentets ændringsforslag som traktatstridigt og gennemfør jeres eget budget.
The difference is that this year the majority has been forced, as a result of certain demonstrations of ill feel ing, particularly from farmers, to show more caution.
Formanden. — Hr. Brøndlund Nielsen har ordet til forretningsordenen.
Therefore, we shall vote against the motion tabled by Mr Adonnino.
Brøndlund Nielsen. — Fru formand, må jeg have lov til ganske kort her som dansker at påtale den udtalelse, der lige er faldet.
As a Dane, I must protest at what we have heard just now.
Jeg vil gerne sige, at jeg føler — og jeg er overbevist om, at mange danskere føler — at man gør rigtigt i at vise solidaritet over for jordskælvet i Italien.
I must say that it is, in my opinion, quite right and proper — and I am convinced that these sentiments will be echoed by many of my fellow Danes — that we should be showing solidarity with the victims of the Italian earthquake.
Hr. Bondes udtalelser om, at den meget beskedne bevilling, der her gives, og dens meget beskedne virkning på det danske budget skulle medføre jordrystelser for danske skatteydere, er en grov uforskammethed, som jeg som dansker skammer mig over, at hr. Bonde fremsætter.
Mr Bonde's comments to the effect that the very modest amount committed here and its very modest effect on the Danish budget will set off tremors felt by the Danish taxpayers is a piece of sheer effrontery, and as a Dane, I am ashamed at what he had to say.
Og intet er mere flygtigt end sandheden.
And nothing more fleeting than truth.
Men til Dem, fru formand, om hvem vi med tilfredshed kan sige, at De kun vil acceptere sandhedens rene diamanter, vil det falde mig let at sige sandheden.
But it will be easy, Madam President, for me to tell you the truth, since we are pleased to accept that only the purest gems of truth are good enough for you.
Dette er muligt, det fremgår af erfaringerne fra i år, selv om Fællesskabt hidtil har ført en statisk handelspolitik.
This is why, as if I needed to say it, my fellow French Socialists and myself voted against the motion tabled by Mr Adonnino.
Men i år er der både i Parlamentet og i Kommissionen forståelse for nødvendigheden af at eksportere landbrugsprodukter og vilje hertil.
As I can see, however, that many other Members did likewise, whilst none the less conniving in the political situation this budget betrays, I feel that we ought to be asking ourselves whether one of the weaknesses of this Parliament is not that it does things, or allows them to be done, without actually saying anything about them.
Dette Europa, som budgettet afspejler, er et ultralibéral!
According to the Treaty, nothing can be added to the Council's proposals unless this House fixes a new rate of increase.
Det er vel overflødigt at sige, at dette er grunden til, at mine franske socialistiske kammerater har stemt mod Adonninos forslag til beslutning. Da jeg imidlertid kan konstatere, at mange andre kolleger har gjort det samme, samtidig med at de har muliggjort den politiske virkelighed, som dette budget er en
In Denmark, that would mean the need for 70 million Dkr more tax, and that at a time when serious consideration is being given to the introduction of charges for prescriptions issued to sick people.
Delatte serne i forbindelse med EUGFL, garantisektionen, og stigningen i noteringerne på verdensmarkedet, og jeg er overbevist om, at vi til foråret vil råde over midler til i passende omfang at forhøje landbrugspriserne og derigennem forbedre landbrugernes indkomster.
Indeed, not only are we surprised that these Members should only now become aware of the errors they denounce, and of the motives which lead them to do something they did not feel to be necessary last year, but we also refuse, for our part, to freeze the. operation of the only Community policy in existence, agricultural policy, whose shortcomings, inequalities and need for reform we are aware of, though we also know that the means for producing circumstances which would give us a different Europe and consequently a different budget, are to be found elsewhere, in political and social struggles, and not in this House.
Derimod beklager jeg dybt det socialistiske ændrings forslag til afsnit 6 i hr. Adonninos forslag til beslut ning, ifølge hvilket vi allerede nu skal give afkald på ethvert tillægsbudget i 1981.
nino's motion for a resolution, which states that as of now we should give up our right to any supplementary budget in 1981.
Det er efter'min mening illusorisk at sige i dag, at vi på forhånd giver afkald på et tillægsbudget, når vi véd, at landbrugsudgifterne udgør en faktor, som det under alle omstændigheder er nødvendigt at tage stilling til.
It is, in my opinion, merely deluding ourselves to think that we can state today that we renounce our right to a supplementary budget when we are aware that farm expenditure is a function of other factors and that, come what may, we will have to meet our obligations.
Det er min opfattelse, at budgetdrøftelserne ikke bør omdannes til en diskussion om landbrugspriserne, til en diskussion om forbedring af den fælles landbrugspolitik.
I maintain that discussions on the budget should not be changed into a discussion on farm prices or on improvements to the common agricultural policy.
Dette hører hjemme i landbrugsudvalget, som er ved at udarbejde en betænkning herom.
It is the job of the Committee on Agriculture, which is now drawing up a report on this matter, to do this.
Og da udvalget sammensatte sin pakke i nat, var talsmændene for de særlige udvalg da i stand til at forelægge deres meninger? Jeg var ikke.
This, Madam President, is another reason why, as Mr Bangemann said just now, we are unable to vote in favour of Mr Adonnino's motion for a resolution.
Konkluderende, fru formand, vil jeg gerne sige, at det er forståeligt, hvis mange udenforstående synes, at budgetproceduren er en farce og bør ændres.
It is no longer possible, this year, to accuse the common agricultural policy of being the root of all evil since we know that the 1981 budget represents an increase of 20 % and agricultural spending only increases by 12 %.
Således som budgettet fremstår efter forkastelsen af ændringsforslagene — jeg har talt, at der er forkastet 94 % af de fremsatte ændringsforslag —, frem skynder det mangelen på energi, det fremskynder en stigning i antallet af arbejdsløse, som allerede er på ca. 8 mio. på fællesskabsplan, det fremskynder en forøgelse af de regionale uligheder.
If Parliament, Madam President, approves a budget of this sort today then it will make millions of Europeans pay in the future for its subservience towards the Council.
Ved at vedtage et sådant budget, fru formand, vil Parlamentet fra i dag lade millioner af europæere betale for dets underdanighed over for Rådet.
However, I do not need to give lengthy explanations of how we have both a moral and a political duty to vote against the motion for a resolution tabled by Mr Adonnino.
Det er derfor ikke nødvendigt, at jeg opholder mig ved at forklare, hvorledes det rent moralsk og politisk er nødvendigt at stemme mod det beslutningsforslag, som er fremsat af hr. Adonnino.
Secondly, trends in world farm prices, not just for sugar or cereals but also for other produce, mean that there will be a large decrease in the amount of refunds. Thus, we can make savings by exporting.
Til slut, fru formand, vil jeg naturligvis fremhæve nødvendigheden af, at Europa officielt anerkender den palæstinensiske modstandsbevægelse.
I shall naturally, Madam President, conclude by refer ring once more to my conviction that Europe ought officially to recognize the Palestine resistance move ment.
Da vi i morges stemte om denne beslutning, var der også et ændringsforslag fra en socialist til punkt 10 i beslut ningen.
This is why the 2 % reserve fund Mr Adonnino suggests does not worry us.
Han foreslog at dette punkt skulle lyde som følger: »Konstaterer, at Rådet næppe har taget hensyn til de mål, Parlamentet har prioriteret i Ferrero-beslutningen om »sulten i verden«, og erklærer, — og nu kommer det — at det navnlig i budgettet vil fortsætte sine bestræbelser på at fremme udviklingspolitikken«.
This 2 % saving will no doubt be far larger, because of savings made in the guarantee section of the EAGGF, and of increases in world farm prices, and I am certain that next spring we shall have the means to increase farm prices as they should be, thereby making possible an improvement in farmers' incomes.
Alt hvad vi har foreslået, hvad angår fødevarehjælpen, hvad angår hjælp til ikkeassocierede udviklingslande, hvad angår Fællesskabets
I think that as we have now passed the budget this morning, it makes no sense to take our spleen out by voting against the resolution; but I imagine I speak for all those who represent the
bede om lov til at stille et spørgsmål til Kommis­sionen. Her til formiddag sagde hr. Tugendhat — jeg citerer ordret:
Patterson now, now that actions must be suited to words, they default on their commitments.
Derfor, fru formand, stemmer jeg imod beslutningen, for jeg vidste, at der fra anden side, fra de britiske konservatives side, ikke ville komme nogen hjælp til vores ændringsforslag.
This is why, Madam President, I will vote against the resolution, because I knew there would be no help for our amendments from the other side, from the British Conservatives.
Den liberale og demokratiske gruppe, hr. Bangemann har allerede sagt det, er af samme mening som os, de stemte for ændringsforsla­gene og de er imod Adonnino­beslutningen i dens nuværende form. Den kristelig­demokratiske gruppe og de konservative i dette Parlament har for et hund­rede og syttende gang gjort en virkelig udviklings­politik umulig!
The Liberals, as Mr Bangemann has already said, hold the same views as us, they voted for the amendments and are against the Andonnino resolution as it now stands.
Dette er den første stemmeforkla­ring, jeg nogen sinde har afgivet.
The scheme to put some of our amendments into the 1980 supplementary budget is ingenious; but what real opportunities were there to put amendments to this Dankert scheme?
Fru formand, ærede kolleger, al den ståhej på grund af et budget, som udgør3Λ af det lille kongerige Belgiens lille budget.
That, Madam President, brings credit neither on the Community nor on anybody concerned.
Problemet er, at budgetproceduren, som er en af Parlamentets virkelige beføjelser, ikke er gennem­sigtig, og denne manglende gennemsigtighed har aldrig været mere tydelig end under de begivenheder, der har fundet sted i de sidste par timer.
The problem is that the budgetary process, which is one of the real powers of this Parliament, is not transparent, and its lack of transparency has never been more obvious than in the events of the last few hours.
Det udvalg, jeg er medlem af, udvalget for miljø­ og sundhedsan­liggender og forbrugerbeskyttelse, arbejdede hårdt og udarbejdede ændringsforslag, vigtige ændringsforslag.
The committee of which I am a member, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection, worked hard and prepared amendments, important amendments.
Budgetudvalget billigede disse forslag efter lang over­vejelse.
The Committee on Budgets approved those amendments after long deliberation.
Og hvad sker der nu?
Now what happens?
Sent om natten fore­tages en omvurdering af prioriteringerne, og en afgivet billigelse annulleres som et led i en eller anden pakkeoverenskomst. Jeg kan forstå behovet for pakkeoverenskomster — man må være gal for ikke at kunne forstå det — men,groceduren er ikke gennem­sigtig.
Late at night priorities are re-assessed, approval which has been given is rescinded in some package deal.
Vi får som en del af pakken tilbudt den gulerod, at vi kan få, hvad vi vil have, i et såkaldt tillægsbudget — Dankert­forslaget — men hvad ser vi så? Jeg taler som lægmand, fru formand.
We are offered as part of the package deal the carrot that we can get what we want under a so-called supplementary budget — the Dankert proposal — but what do we find?
Hvad ser vi så?
What do we find?
Vi ser, at det rent faktisk er noget vrøvl: gule­roden findes ikke, fordi tidsfristen for forelæggelse af ændringsforslag til Dankert­forslaget allerede er overskredet, og der er ikke mulighed for under Dankert at indvinde, hvad vi har tabt under Adori­
We find that actually this is nonsense: the carrot does not exist, because the moment for tabling amendments under the Dankert proposal has already passed and there is no opportunity to recapture under Dankert what you lost under Adonnino.
Fru formand, kolleger, ganske vist har jeg fået ordet efter hr. Tugendhat's tale i går, men måske vil mine bemærkninger dog også være af betydning for ham.
When we voted on the resolution this morning, an amendment was proposed by a Socialist to paragraph 10 of the resolution.
Jeg tror, kolleger, at det i det hele taget er umuligt, at dette Parlament vedtager så meget som een eneste beslutning efter udviklingen i de sidste timer af vores budgetdebat og efter afstem­ningerne i morges.
He suggested the following wording for this paragraph: 'notes that the Council have taken scant account of the priorities set by Parliament in the Ferrerò Report on world hunger and declares its intention' — and this is the point — 'on continuing its endeavours to promote development policy, particularly through the budget'.
Hvad er der her på færde? Der er et tillægsbudget for 1980, som faktisk skaffer os pengemidler.
This amend ment was naturally drawn up, Madam President, before we cast our votes, in the hope that when we voted on the budget, we would be able to put these priorities into effect.
Jeg stoler virkelig på at Parlamentet ved en eventuel anden runde, denne gang vil holde stand.
The Christian Democrats have prevented that happen ing.
Ingen kan således påstå, at denne procedure har været gennemsigtig.
So let nobody pretend that this process has been transparent!
Den er ikke gennemsigtig.
It is not transparent.
Den er rent faktisk en skandale, og jeg er enig med hr. Patterson her.
It is actually a disgrace, and I follow Mr Patterson here.
Udvalgene arbejdede hårdt; de havde ideer; Kommissionen — tro det, om De vil — tilslut­tede sig faktisk disse ideer.
Committees did work hard; they had ideas; the Commission — would you believe it? — acutally agreed with those ideas.
Under stort pres sagde hr. Tugendhat, ja, han kunne tilslutte sig det, der var blevet foreslået, og så bliver det smidt ud af vinduet.
Under great pressure, Mr Tugendhat, said, yes, he agreed with what was proposed, and it gets thrown
Fru formand, ærede kolleger!
Those are the words you used.
Jeg har bedt om ordet til forretningsordenen, fordi jeg har indtryk af, at vi i den sidste time påny har holdt en generaldebat. . .
Now what were you referring to? — The decisions of the Committee on Budgets taken seriously after due consideration in the three-day meeting of December, of the late-night package cooked up at the last minute under pressure of a Council ultimatum which appears not to have materialized?
... og jeg mener, at præsidiet bør tage dette spørgsmål op, for at forhindre, at noget sådant gentager sig.
the last few hours of our budget debate and after the voting this morning, it is quite impossible for this Parliament to adopt any more resolutions.
Vi stjæler nemlig bare tid fra hinanden.
What is going on here?
Afgørelsen kunne allerede være truffet meget tidligere.
There is a supplementary 1980 budget which actually provides us with the funds we need.
Jeg fristedes ved flere lejligheder til at bede om ordet, fordi der efterhånden var blevet sagt så meget, der egentlig ikke kunne stå uimodsagt, fordi det er helt ukorrekt.
I am confident that this time, if there is a second read ing, Parliament will stand its ground.
Mine bemærkninger til forretningsordenen har til formål at hindre, at sådanne miniature-generaldebatter finder sted i fremtiden.
This is money which should, really, be used for the Social Fund, though I am not sure whether we will ultimately be able to use them for the various aims we set ourselves, such as development cooperation, energy policy and social measures in the steel sector.
Det er på grund af denne usikkerhed at min gruppe har forsøgt at få i det mindste et minimalt antal ændringsforslag igennem og lade stemme herom ved behandlingen af budgettet for 1981.
It is because of this uncertainty that my group has tried to get at least a minimum number of amendments accepted, and to have them voted on in the 1981 budget debate.