natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Med hensyn til efterkommeise af enhver anmodning om udtræden fra tjenestemænd, der har nået 60 års alderen, er det rigtigt, at dette princip fandtes i de tidligere foranstaltninger, men disse var kun gælden de for en begrænset periode.
Amendment No 2 tabled by the Legal Affairs Com mittee does introduce a difference which is not in the Commission text.
Under de af Kommissionen foreslåede omstændigheder forekommer ændringsforslag nr. 8 at ville medføre en begrænsning af fællesskabsinstitutionernes frihed til at bestemme, hvilke anmondinger om udtræden der skal efterkommes.
The principle behind the first amendment thus makes it acceptable to the Commission but if it is to be implemented, the second amend ment must be rejected, so that the text applicable to Greece is restored in its entirely in relation to Spain and Portugal.
Udvalget om retlige anliggender og borgernes rettigheder har taget hensyn til de midlertidigt ansattes interesser. Det påskønner Kommissionen.
The Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights is reflecting the concerns of temporary staff.
Glem ikke, at Kommissionen beskæftiger et meget stort antal midlertidigt ansatte, hvoraf en del har arbejdet i Kommissionen i mange år og fortjener påskønnelse.
Don't forget that it employs a large number of temporary staff some of whom have been in its service for many years and deserve tribute.
Men disse problemer kan ikke juridisk omfattes af samme tekst og på samme måde som for de fastansatte tjenestemænds vedkommende, idet de to juridiske situationer er grundlæggende forskellige.
But these concerns cannot legally be tackled in the same text and in the same way as for permanent officials: the legal situations are fundamentally different.
Derfor kan Kommisionen ikke acceptere ændringsforslagene nr. 3, 4 og 11.
The Commission therefore can not accept Amendments Nos 3, 4 and 11.
Nr. 11 er for øvrigt taget tilbage.
No 11, it should be said, has been withdrawn.
Budgetudvalget har helt fattet vanskeligheden ved samtidig at løse spørgsmålene vedrørende tjeneste mændene og de midlertidigt ansatte.
The Committee on Budgets has well understood the difficulty of settling at one and the same time questions relating both to officials'and to temporary staff.
I sin udtalelse går budgetudvalget ind for særlige foranstaltninger for at imødegå de midlertidigt ansattes vanskeligheder.
In its opinion it advocates special measures to deal with some of the problems of temporary staff.
Kommissionen erklærer klart, at den er rede til at undersøge denne mulighed, der skulle muliggøre be handling af reelle vanskeligheder, som Parlamentet, Kommissionen og de øvrige institutioner er stødt på, og som er fælles for alle midlertidigt ansatte.
The Commission hereby states categorically that it is ready to consider their solution for tackling the very real difficulties encountered in the Parliament, in the Com mission and in the institutions, and which are common to all temporary staff.
Kom missionen regner med at kunne fremsætte forslag in den udgangen af indeværende år.
Proposals could be presented by the Commission before the end of this year.
For det fjerde stiller retsudvalget ændringsforslag nr. 9, der har til formål for tjenestemænd, der indtil 1981 var underlagt de regler, der gjaldt for EKSFs tjeneste mænd indtil 1962, at genindføre disse regler.
The obligations involved in the accession of Portugal and Spain in the matter of recruitment also entail, failing the creation of numerous new posts, provision for early retirement for a certain number of officials. This is obvious.
Siden da har Fællesskabets tjenestemænd været underlagt fælles regler.
Our proposal is not addressed to this problem alone, since it was considered appropriate to use the opportunity offered to set up a permanent instrument.
Efter 23 års forløb at genindføre de gamle regler ville være en berettiget æresbevisning over for dem, der i mange år har tjent EKSF.
This is why Amendments Nos 16 to 20 seem to us fundamentally at variance with this position and cannot be accepted by the Commission.
Tilbage står imidlertid vanskeligheden med at indføre overgangsbestemmelser, der skal tillade genoplivelse af rettigheder, der for længst er ophørt med at eksistere.
By means of this permanent instrument it will be possible, year after year, and whenever considered appropriate by the budgetary authority, to meet the wishes of various officials desirous of terminating their employment at an earlier date, and of those officials only.
For det andet accepterer udvalget om retlige anliggender og borgernes rettigheder det princip, at tjeneste mænds udtræden af tjenesten kun kan ske på frivilligt grundlag.
Second, the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights accepts and approves the principle whereby the cessation of an official's employment can only be on a voluntary basis.
Det takker vi udvalget for.
Our thanks for this.
Imidlertid har udvalget anset det for rigtigt på listen over de omfattede lønklasser at medtage Al og A2.
Amendment No 5 of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights does not appear acceptable to the Commission.
Denne ændring ville berøve institutionerne retten til at fratage de i
It would considerably diminish the powers of the institutions' authorities.
For at tingene kan stå helt klart, skal jeg endelig, hr. formand, gøre opmærksom på, at Kommissionen, dersom Parlamentet vedtager ændringsforslagene nr. 1, 9, 10 og 21, kan acceptere disse, hvorimod den ikke kan gå ind for de øvrige ændringsforslag.
Third, the Committee on Legal Affairs and Citizens' Rights has further proposed to extend the ambit of the text to include officials between 50 and 54 years of age, subject to a certain period of seniority, whilst the Commission, I would remind you, proposes that it be limited to officials of at least 55 years of age with sen-
Formanden. — Det er rigtigt, hr. von der Vring.
Cheysson we do not know how many volunteers there will be in each grade?
Hvad er det anslået til?
iority of ten years or more.
Hr. Peter Price sagde, at de offentliggjorte overslag var 1000% ved siden af.
Amendment No 7 would involve a substantial increase in the cost of the operation.
I betragtning heraf forestillede jeg mig, at det ville være i Kommissionens interesse at give os oplysning om disse tal.
Moreover, it should not be forgotten that the Commission's proposal has a character of permanency.
Hvordan skulle man derfor kunne lave en forhåndsberegning, når vi intet ved om, hvor mange der frivilligt vil ønske at udtræde af tjenesten inden for hver lønklasse?
It is not advisable that the opportunity for retirement which would thus be afforded on a permanent basis from the age of 50 should have the effect of weaken ing existing rules.
Ford (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, det har været en yderst tyndbenet forhandling.
Mr Ford (S). — Mr President, this debate has been an extremely thin debate.
Kommissionen har forsømt at fremlægge noget talmateriale i det hele taget.
The Commission has failed to produce any figures.
Vi har hørt nogle påstande fra et af de konservative medlemmer om, hvor meget det vil komme til at koste.
We have had some allegations from one of the Conservatives opposite about how much it is going to cost.
Det er indlysende, at Kommissionen har brug for lidt tid til at udarbejde talmaterialet...
We clearly need to have some time for the Commission to prepare the figures . . .
Lord Bethell (ED). - (EN) Hr. formand, må jeg foreslå, at sagen i henhold til forretningsordenens ar tikel 85, stk. 1, henvises til fornyet udvalgsbehandling? ling?
Lord Bethell (ED). — Can I propose, Mr President, under Rule 85(1), that this matter be referred back to committee?
Når Parlamentet stemmer om vigtige tekster uden nogen forudgående drøftelse, kan det kun bringe sig i miskredit, specielt når vedkommende beslutninger kan vedrøre fremmede regeringer, som Fællesskabet plejer nære og venskabelige forbindelser med.
As to meeting the requests of all officials who have reached the age of 60, it is true that this principle did underline earlier releases from employment, but it was only intended to apply for a limited period. As seen by the Commission, Amendment No 8 appears calculated to limit the discretionary power of choice which the Community institutions want to retain in respect of staff wishing to retire.
Formanden. — Jeg er nu i stand til at forelægge protokollen fra mødet i går til godkendelse.
President. — I am now in a position to put to the House the Minutes of yesterday's sitting.
Den er om delt på alle sprog.
They have been distributed in all the languages.
Jeg mener, at der i bestemmelserne ligger, at der skal være en debat.
In this way Community officials are subject to identical arrangements.
Og mens enkeltmedlemmer kan give afkald på deres ret til at tale, forekommer det mig, at hvis Parlamentet vedtager, at der ingen debat skal være, er det en overtrædelse af denne bestemmelse.
To revive old rules after a lapse of 23 years would be a fitting tribute to those who have rendered the ECSC long service.
Jeg vil opfordre Dem til at henvise sagen till udvalget for forretningsordenen og for andragender.
There is of course a difficulty here: What should be the transitional arrangements to revive rights which have long since ceased?
Patterson (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, er afstemningslisterne en del af protokollen eller ej?
Mr Patterson (ED). — Mr President, do the division lists form part of the Minutes or not?
Vi har den egentlige protokol, men vi har ikke listen over, hvem der har stemt.
We have the Minutes proper, but we do not have the lists of those voting.
Når man godkender protokollen, siger man så dermed også god for listens nøjagtighed?
When you approve the Minutes, do you also approve the accuracy of the division lists?
Jeg vil gerne bede Dem opklare det, for det har ikke været helt klart tidligere.
I should like you to clear this matter up, because it has not been quite clear in the past.
Formanden. — Hr. Price, en lignende bemærkning kom hr. Jackson med i går.
IN THE CHAIR: MR GRIFFITHS
Faktisk var det mig, der førte forsædet, da den episode fandt sted, som De nævner.
President. — Mr Patterson, that is normally the case.
Jeg spurgte udtrykkeligt de medlemmer, der var på talerlisten, om de var rede til at give afkald på taleretten. Det var ikke en vedtagelse i Parlamentet som helhed.
However, we have not got the division lists in front of us.
Det var en beslutning truffet af hvert af de medlemmer, der havde ret til at tage ordet under den uopsættelige debat.
If, at the next part-session, there are some mistakes on the division lists, Members will have an opportunity to raise the matter then.
Formanden. — Hr. Patterson, det er normalt tilfældet. Imidlertid foreligger afstemningslisterne ikke for os.
Sir Fred Catherwood (ED). — I did ask a very simple question and that was how much this was going to cost?
Jeg statuerer derfor, at vi kun kan acceptere det, der foreligger for os i øjeblikket.
How can we possibly give an a priori estimate when
Hvis der i næste mødeperiode viser sig fejl i afstemningslisterne, vil medlemmerne have mulighed for at rejse spørgsmålet til den tid.
Mr Ford (S). — Page 44 of the Minutes, in relation to Document B2-489/85, states that the roll-call vote was requested by the Socialist Group.
Formanden tages, og at vi kommer igennem vore fælleskabsforretninger og vore uopsættelige debatter.
President. — Mr Ford, this matter will be taken into account when the Minutes are revised.
kan sikre, at de tre timer anvendes med udbytte til en regulær debat om uopsættelige sager.
If there is a better way of dealing with them — and you have suggested that we look into this — then by all means let us do so.
Elliott (S). - (EN) Hr. formand, det glædede mig meget at høre, hvad De sagde om dette, for jeg me ner, at spørgsmålet absolut trænger til nærmere over vejelse, men ikke på den måde, vil jeg påstå, som blev foreslået fra den anden side i salen. Ærlig talt mener jeg, at hvis vi går videre, som vi har gjort i de foregående måneder, vil vi aldrig blive i stand til at drøfte nogle af de vigtige hovedpunkter.
Mr Price (ED). — Mr President, I would like to ask for the matter that arose at the end of the topical and urgent debate to be referred to the Committee on the Rules of Procedure and Petitions.
Jeg vil anbefale, at side 39 foroven ændres i den retning; dér får man det indtryk, at Parlamentet var indforstået med frem gangsmåden. Jeg vil foreslå, at De formulerer det sådan: »Forsamlingens medlemmer gjorde ikke ind sigelse«.
I have undertaken to see that the proper people investigate a way in which we can have the full three hours and a proper debate on urgent items.
Gang på gang er vitale spørgsmål om menneskerettigheder ikke blevet drøftet, fordi de er blevet trængt ud.
It is really a question of the organization of our work in the plenary partsession.
Hvis man var villig til at sætte disse meget vigtige spørgsmål om menneskerettigheder højere op på dagsordenen under den uopsættelige debat fremfor nogle af de mere tekniske sager, der undertiden kom mer tidligt til behandling, så var vi måske ikke i de vanskeligheder, vi nu er i.
All I wanted to say was that it surely raises the whole question of our four days in Strasbourg, which have now manifestly become quite insufficient for the volume of work we have to deal with.
Cryer (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, De er uden tvivl klar over, at det i artikel 89, stk. 1,1, konkret hedder:
It seems to me that the rule implies that there should be a debate.
En protokol over hvert møde, der indeholder Parlamentets beslutninger og navnene på talerne, omdeles mindst en halv time før åbningen af næstfølgende møde.
And whilst individual speakers may waive their right to speak, for Parliament to take a decision that there will be no debate seems to me to be an infringement of the rule.
Så vidt jeg ved, skete dette ikke i dag; en blev omdelt under mødet, og dermed har vi overtrådt artikel 89.
President. — Mr Prag, the Bureau will be discussing this at a meeting to be held before the next plenary partsession.
Jeg mener, at forsamlingen i denne uge fandt — og jeg sympatiserer med det — at vi må være i stand til at behandle disse sager og stemme om dem.
President. — Mr Price, Mr Jackson raised a similar point yesterday.
Hvis der er en bedre måde at gøre det på — og De foreslog, at vi kigger på det — så lad os da endelig gøre det.
In fact, I was in the Chair when the event you referred to took place.
Desuden ved jeg ikke, om den bestemmelse, der kræver, at alle vore dokumenter skal foreligge på alle Fællesskabets sprog, på grund af den sene omdeling af protokollen er blevet overholdt.
It was a decision taken by each Member who had the right to speak in those urgent debates.
Formanden. — Jeg tager Deres bemærkninger ad no tam, hr. Elliott.
Mr Prag (ED). — It is nice for us to know that.
Jeg har lovet at sørge for, at rette vedkommende undersøger, hvordan vi kan udnytte de fulde tre ti mer til en regulær debat om uopsættelige spørgsmål. Jeg tror ikke, vi kan gøre noget for at fremme sagen her i formiddag.
I agree with you that this is not a procedure we should follow again, and I will ask the chairmen of the political groups, who have responsibility for deciding what items will be presented for urgent debate, to look at the way in which that part of our business is con ducted so that we can ensure that the three hours will be usefully spent in a proper debate on urgent matters.
Prag (ED). - (EN) Undskyld, hr. formand, men det er ikke bare et spørgsmål om den uopsættelige debat.
Mr von der Vring (S). — (DE) With regard to the Minutes, pages 38-39 contain the entry relating to this.
Det er i virkeligheden et spørgsmål om tilrettelæggelsen af vort arbejde i mødeperioden.
What you have just said means that in your view Par liament did not decide there should be no debate but the Members present waived their right to ask for the floor.
Og resultatet af at have protokoller på 90 sider, hvor det meste faktisk er afstemning og meget lidt forhandling — hvilket er i modstrid med enhver form for demokratisk procedure — er, at vi, forstår jeg, har over trådt artikel 89.
Mr Elliott (S). — Mr President, I am very pleased to hear what you have said on this, because I think the matter does need further examination, but not, I would submit, in the way that has been suggested from the other side of the House.
Hr. formand, vil protokollens god kendelse blive udsat til næste mødeperiode, fordi ar tikel 89 er blevet overtrådt, eller skal vi gå videre med overtrædelsen og stemme nu?
Quite frankly, it seems to me that if we are to proceed as we have done in previous months, we are never going to be able to debate some of the key issues of importance.
Prag (ED). — (EN) Det er rart at vide.
I know, as I made the announcement.
Det er kor rekt, at vi får det at vide, og jeg vil være meget interesseret i, hvad der kommer ud af det.
Time and time again crucial issues of human rights have not been debated because they have been squeezed out.
Hele Parlamentets ry afhænger af, at gårsdagens kaos ikke gen-
If there was a preparedness to put these very important human rights issues higher on the agenda in the urgency debate, in preference to some of the more technical points that are sometimes put earlier on, we might not be in the difficulty we are.
Formanden. — Hr. Cryer, De har rejst et teknisk spørgsmål om den mængde arbejde, vi udførte i går, hvilket hindrede, at protokollen var her, en halv time
Mr Cryer (S). — Mr President, you will no doubt be aware of Rule 89(1), which says specifically:
Formanden brugeren ved af dybfrosne levnedsmidler i helt væsentlig grad gennem dette lovforsalg.
Cryer not more than three minutes about it, but I would be very grateful for your guidance on that matter.
Efter at alle i øvrigt meget vigtige lovinitiativer, der ville betyde en forbedring for forbrugeren, i mange år har ligget stille hos Rådet, forventer vi, at dette for slag fra Kommissionen hurtigt vil passere hindringer ne i Rådet.
So far as I am aware, this did not take place today: they were distributed during the sitting and, therefore, we are in breach of Rule 89.
Christopher Jackson (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, jeg tager ordet til forretningsordenen i overensstemmelse med artikel 83, stk. 1, og beder om Deres vejledning netop med hensyn til denne artikel. Jeg vil gerne kon kret have at vide, hvornår et medlem, der vil rejse et vigtigt spørgsmål om ledelsen af arbejdet i Parlamentet, hvad hr. Prag prøvede at gøre, faktisk kan gøre det.
President. — Mr Jackson, as you have referred to Rule 83, you can see that this point of order can be made during a debate, so it would be up to the Chair to give the Member making the point of order the time he needs under the Rules to make his point of order provided, of course, it relates to the matters that Rule 83 refers to.
Jeg tillader mig at konstatere, at udvalget med stort flertal på tværs af alle grupper har vedtaget såvel de stillede ændringsforslag som Kommissionens forslag som sådant.
In addition, because of the late distribution of the Minutes, I wonder whether the rule that requires all our documents to be in all the Community languages has been adhered to.
Dybfrosne levnedsmidler
Quickfrozen foodstuffs
A2-53/85) af Schleicher for udvalget om miljø- og sundhedsanliggender og forbrugerbe skyttelse over forslag fra Kommissionen til Rådet (KOM(84) 489 endel. -dok.
A 2-53/85) by Mrs Schleicher, on behalf of the Com mittee on the Environment, Public Health and Con sumer Protection on the proposal from the Commission to the Council (COM(84) 489 final — Doc.
2-777/84) om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om dybfrosne levnedsmidler.
2-777/84) for a directive on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to quickfrozen foodstuffs for human consumption
Fru Schleicher har vist mere eller mindre sagt de ting, der blev sagt i udvalget.
The breach of Rule 89 occurred because of the decision by the enlarged Bureau, spurred on, I gather, by the President, to adopt a theme for each week.
Der er den generelle indstilling, at forburgerne skal beskyttes ved køb af disse produkter.
As a result, we have Minutes some 90 pages long!
Vi vil gerne sikre, at forbrugerne ved, hvad de køber, og at der ikke er nogen risici for for brugerne. Alle disse punkter er vist indeholdt i teksten og i de ændringsforslag, som den socialistiske gruppe vil støtte.
As a result of having Minutes some 90 pages long, most of which, in fact, were taken up with voting and very little with debate — which is contrary to any sort of democratic procedure anyhow — we have breached, as I understand it, Rule 89.
Schleicher (PPE), ordfører. - (DE) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, Europa-Parlamentet glæder sig over forslaget til Rådet til direktiv om indbyrdes til nærmelse af medlemsstaternes lovgivning om dyb frosne levnedsmidler.
Mrs Schleicher (PPE), rapporteur. — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the European Parliament welcomes the proposal for a Council directive on the approximation of the laws of the Member States on quickfrozen foodstuffs.
Med denne ordning sikres det, at der fremover ikke vil være nogen handelshindringer mellem medlemsstaterne ved samhandelen med dybfrosne levnedsmidler.
This measure will put a stop to distortions of trade in these goods among Member States, distortions which have existed hitherto either because a Member State requires special certificates for the import of these foodstuffs or because differ ences in national legislation seriously impede transfrontier traffic in these goods.
Disse handelshindringer har hidtil været der, fordi én medlemsstat kræver særlige certifikater ved indførsel af disse levnedsmidler, eller fordi den grænseoverskridende handel i vidt omfang hæmmes på grund af den uensartede nationale lovgivning på dette område.
I am in the hands of the House as far as your feel ings about the breach of this Rule is concerned: if the House feels that it wants to approve the Minutes today, then I think we can approve them, whilst very carefully noting your comments and the need to make sure that our business is better organized in future sit tings.
For det andet — og det er for mig som ordfører og for udvalget om miljøog sundhedsanliggender og forbrugerbeskyttelse det væsentlige synspunkt — forbedres beskyttelsen af for
Whereas all other very important legislative proposals for improving the consumer's situation have been blocked in the Council for years, we trust that this proposal will soon jump the Council hurdle.
Jeg vil navnlig gerne henlede opmærksomheden på ændringsforsalg nr. 15 og 16, som jeg håber Parlament vil støtte.
I wish to know specifically at what point a Member wishing to raise an important point about the conduct of business of this Parliament, as Mr Prag was seeking to do, can in fact do so.
Ændringsforslag nr. 15 er et ændringsforslag vedrørende temperatursvingninger.
My understanding of Rule 83(1) is that a Member can raise a point of order and may speak for
Nyere undersøgelser har vist, at der ikke er nogen tekniske vanskeligheder med frysebokse, der ville medføre svingninger på mere end 3°C. Hvis man lader en fryseboks stå åben i 30 minutter, hr, for mand, vil det glæde Dem at høre, at temperaturen kun stiger 3°.
The committee's amendments relate to further points designed to improve the labelling and so offer the con sumer better information when purchasing quickfrozen foodstuffs.
Jeg er sikker på, at Deres liv er blevet umådelig forbedret gennem den nye viden, De lige
I may point out that both the Com mission's proposal and the amendments tabled here were approved in committee by a large majority repre-
Jeg mener, at denne forskel bør fremgå af etiketterne.
senting all political groups.