natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg har allerede sagt, at den tyske delegation ikke har noget.
As I have said, the German delegation has none.
Det kunne for eksempel bestå i, at det generelle niveau for intensiv korn dyrkning — blandt andet anvendelsen af kvælstof og andre kemikalier, der øger høstudbyttet — forringes, i hvilken forbindelse der skulle betales en udligning, således at vi endelig kan komme væk fra anvendlesen af kemikalier i landbruget. Det ville være et meget fornuftigt forslag!
We could try to reduce the gen eral intensity of crop-growing techniques in the cereals sector — for instance the use of nitrogen and other yield-increasing chemicals, and pay a price for this, so that we can at last put a stop to the overuse of chemicals in farming.
d'Ormesson (DR). — (FR) Hr. formand, når jeg nu henvender mig til formanden for Kommissioen vil jeg godt i denne debat minde ham om, at Pierre Froment, professor i landbrugsøkonomi ved Collège de France, — som var en stor europæer, én af de vigtig ste ophavsmænd til Romtraktaten — altid advarede os mod prisgarantipolitikker, fordi de fører til ekstreme spændinger når overskuddene bliver for store på verdensmarkedet.
Mr d'Ormesson (DR). — (FR) Mr President, I would like to remind the President of the Commission that Pierre Froment, who was professor of rural economics at the Collège de France — a great European and one of the main architects of the Treaty of Rome — always warned us that the policy of guaranteed prices would cause extremely severe tension when surpluses increased on the world market.
Er De for det tredje enig med mig i, at prisnedsættelser på dette område ikke har nogen indflydelse på forbrugerpriserne?
Secondly, is it not true that the price cut for corn is connected with the dispute between the Community and the USA over export markets in the third world or in other non-Community countries and that export subsidies are to be saved in order to achieve a better negotiation position in this trade war?
Det siger jeg henvendt til den so cialistiske og kommunistiske gruppe, fordi det her løbende fremføres.
Thirdly, do you not agree that price cuts in this sector have no influence on consumer prices?
Kun 12% af den pris, producenterne får, indgår i forbrugerpriserne.
Only 12% of the price paid to the producer is included in consumer prices.
For at gøre det tydeligt ud fra et eksempel : hvedens andel af af prisen for et rundstukke udgør 1 pfennig. Hvedeprisen kunne stige med det dobbelte, så ville rundstukket blive 1 eller Vh pfennig dyrere. En forhøjelser på 0,8% eller 3,6% ville på dette punkt ingen konsekvenser fa.
For example, wheat accounts for one pfennig in the price of a bread roll. If
Vi har oprettet Romtraktaten for at sikre fri bevæge lighed for personer, varer og kapital.
We drew up the Treaty of Rome to ensure free move ment of people, goods and capital.
Vi har ligeledes baseret vor fælles landbrugspolitik på, at det er nødvendigt at sikre landmændene en tilstrækkelig indtægt.
We also based our common agricultural policy on the need to provide farmers with an adequate income.
Vort Fællesskab har været ude for meget. Mange meget alvorligere situationer end den vi står i i dag.
The Community has gone through some very troubled periods which have been infinitely worse than the present crisis.
Så her kommer mine to spørgsmål, hr. for mand.
I now turn, Mr President, to my two questions.
For det første ville vi have kunnet undgå den nuværende krise ved at bede Forbundsrepublikken Tysklands regering om at indføre en samansvarsafgift på korn?
Firstly, could we have avoided the present crisis by asking the Federal German Government to introduce a coresponsibility levy on cereals?
For det fjerde har Parlamentet besluttet, at der skal gennemføres prisforhøjelser, hvilket der netop blev henvist til.
stand that he intends to assume his responsibility now that the Council has failed to act.
Hvorfor retter Kommissionen sig ikke efter disse forsalg fra Parlamentet?
This seems to me a sensible idea, and if I understand him correctly, the Commissioner plans to fix a new price for the inter vention agencies.
Det er næsten mit indtryk, at Parlamentet jublede over, at Kommissionen har fået det sidste ord.
May I therefore conclude that the intervention price will be cut by 1.8% for cereals?
Hvordan kan man få det til at stemme?
I would like to have that explained again in precise terms.
Mit andet spørgsmål er følgende: De mødes snart under et stort topmøde i Milano.
Secondly, you will soon be attending an important summit meeting in Milan.
I stedet for at skændes, når øjeblikket kommer, om problemet med vor deltagelse i SDI og iværksættelsen af Eureka-projek-tet, samt om hovedlinjerne for fremtidens Europa, ville det så ikke være bedre at tale med vore amerikanske allierede om en konference om ansvarsfordeling vis-à-vis de store markeder i den tredje verden, mellem Det europæiske Fællesskab og USA.
Instead of arguing when we face the problem of our participation in the IDS, the Eureka project and in Europe's great plans for the future, perhaps we should ask our American allies to start negotiations on the sharing of responsibilities between the Community and the United States with regard to the main Third World markets.
For jeg hørte her til morgen hr. Cheysson tale om Latinamerika, hvor vor politik skal være rettet mod USA's!
This morning I listened to Mr Cheysson's comments on Latin America, where our policies are opposed to those of the United States.
Det er ikke hvad jeg kalder ansvarsfordeling!
That is not sharing responsibilities!
Pannella (NI). — (FR) Hr. formand, vi har læst — og ingen har, så vidt jeg kan se dementeret det — hvad der skete i går, måske burde det have fået formanden for Kommissioen til at gå af.
Mr Pannella (NI). — (FR) Mr President, we have read — and it seems to me that noone has denied this — that what happened yesterday ought possibly to have lead the President of the Commission to resign.
Ville det, og det er mit sidste spørgslmål, hvis man er interesseret i at nedbringe overskudene, ikke være mere hensigtsmæssigt at sætte ind der, hvor disse mængder i virkeligheden produceres, nemlig ind en for de kornbrug, der drives meget intensivt og med anvendelse af kemikalier?
As for my second point, you might recall that a report was suddenly received from Germany in May/June of 1984 to the effect that the German Ministry was requesting an increase in the VAT rates, the VAT amount.
De berøres ikke af denne prisnedsættelse, men drives endnu mere i retning af intensivering og anvendelse af kemikalier.
Shortly after the dismantling of the MCAs, Germany felt it had to introduce its own funding arrangements.
Gennem en generel lineær prisnedsættelse elimineres grænsebedrifterne — altså de bedrifter, der alligevel ikke
We later had a debate on the subject here and we clearly expressed our outrage at the matter.
Nu siger man til os, at hr. Andriessen som en anden krigsmand, tager til Bayern, og kommer i den grønne gryde. Det er ikke helt det samme.
Now that he has rightly assumed his responsibility, may I also ask the Commissioner to assure us that this renationalization of agricultural policy will be prevented at all costs, to ensure that the German Govern ment does not decide to make up the price cuts itself?
Men ironien er næppe på sin plads, for samtidig må vi erkende, et Rådets brøde, under det italienske formandskab, er
I feel it is extremely important for the Commissioner to declare before this House that he will ensure that the German Government does not adopt a policy of renationalization, as has already happened on a couple of occasions.
Europa-Parlamentets forhandlinger
I think that this assurance must be given.
Formanden. — Jeg er nødt til at meddele Parlamentet, at de 30 minutter der var afsat til dabatten er gået. Der er tretten indskrevne talere tilbage.
I very much regret that a number of previous speakers spoke for too long, and that is why we are in this situation.
Jeg beklager meget, at mange af de foregående talere talte i for lang tid. hvilket har ført os ud i denne situation.
Now we are told that Mr Andriessen is off to do battle in Bavaria armed with a report.
alvorlig og uden fortilfælde.
That isn't quite the same thing.
Dette samme Råd, som tillod sit formandskab, at komme her og fortælle os, at man lige før Milanotopmødet var ved at vedtage Europa-Parlamentets synspunkter — hvilket i må nedsvis gjorde det umuligt for mange europæiske og italienske politikere at søge stemmer hos den euro pæiske offentlighed — er i dag ikke tilstede.
But irony is perhaps inappropriate since the Council's shortcomings under the Italian Presidency have been undeniably serious and unprecedented. The Council, which permitted its presidency to come here and tell us, on the eve of the Milan sum mit, that it was about to act in accordance with Parlia ment's wishes — which for months enabled certain European and Italian politicians to gain political prestige — is absent today.
Måske havde hr. Romeo og Papapietro ikke helt uret, da de bad os om at overveje denne debats planlægning en halv time, måske skulle vi have bedt Dem kræve, at Rådet var tilstede her i eftermiddag.
Perhaps Mr Romeo and Mr Papapietro were not altogether wrong in asking us to think for half an hour before organizing this debate. Perhaps we should have asked you to insist on the Council's presence here this afternoon.
Castle (S). — (EN) Hr. formand, vil De være så ven lig at få overholdt demokratiets regler her?
Mrs Castle (S). — Mr President, will you please give us some democracy in this place?
Når De beder om spørgsmål, vil De så i formandstolen insistere på, at det skal være spørgsmål og ikke taler, og vil De begrænse hver taler til blot ét spørgsmål, så alle kan få en chance?
When you call for questions, will you in the Chair insist that they are questions and not speeches, and will you limit every speaker to one question only and give everybody a chance?
Jeg kan blot konstatere, når de 30 minutter er gået.
I note simply that the 30 minutes are up.
Kære kolleger, jeg er parat til at forlænge debatten med et kvarter.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am prepared to extend the debate by a quarter of an hour.
Jeg vil godt stille følgende spørgsmål, eftersom for manden for Kommissionen er tilstede — som vi bør takke ikke bare for hr. kommissær Andriessens re degørelse, men også for hans og mange andre kom missærers tilstedeværelse. — Hr. formænd, for Kom missionen, bør Kommissionen ikke selv nu en uge før Milano-topmødet, gøre sit visse uopsættelige tanker, på baggrund af at dens aktioner indtil nu har været utilstrækkelige på det institutionelle plan?
I would like to take advantage of the fact that the Commission President is here — the Commission should be thanked not only for the report by Mr Andriessen but also for his presence and that of many Commissioners — to ask the following question: Mr Delors, would it not be advisable, on the eve of the Milan summit, for the Commission to consider the present situation as a matter of urgency and recognize the extent to which its actions have so far been inadequate as far as the institutions are concerned?
Og kunne De ikke forsikre os om, at Kommissionen i Milano vil tage roret efter det italienske formand skab, som desværre allerede ny synes at have fralagt sig ansvaret og svigtet sine løfter?
Can you give us an assurance that the Commission will replace the Italian presidency in Milan, which appears to have already abdicated its responsibilities and broken its promises?
Andriessen, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (NL) Hr. formand, jeg vil forsøge at besvare de spørgsmål, der er stillet om landbrugspolitikken, hvorefter for manden for Kommissionen vil gå ind på de institutionelle aspekter, som mange medlemmer har bragt frem.
Mr Andriessen, Vice-President of the Commission. — (NL) Mr President, I shall try to answer the questions on agriculture, after which the President of the Com mission will deal with the institutional aspects raised by many of the honourable Members.
Woltjer (S). — (NL) Jeg vil gerne begynde med at sige, hvor meget jeg respekterer den måde, hr. An driessen har arbejdet på de sidste måneder.
Mr Woltjer (S). — (NL) I would like to start by expressing my respect for the way in which Mr Andriessen has operated these past few months.
Den utvetydighed, det mod og den stædighed, der har kende tegnet hans arbejde, sætter jeg stor pris på.
I highly appreciate his clarity, courage and tenacity.
Også hans sidste redegørelse var klar.
His last statement was lucid as well, I must say.
Hr. formand, jeg er meget erkendtlig for de mange rosende ord, flere medlemmer har udtalt med adresse til Kommissionen, og i et enkelt tilfælde til mig per sonlig.
Mr President, I am grateful for the praise a number of speakers had for the Commission in general and in one case for myself in particular.
Alligevel har jeg endnu et konkret spørgsmål, som jeg anmoder kommissæren om at besvare.
However, I have a specific question to put and would like an assurance from the Commissioner.
Andriessen overveje muligheden, men er ikke rede til at foreslå denne foranstaltning uden tilstrækkelige forberedelser. ser.
The Commission is ready to consider the matter, but not prepared to make such a proposal without ade quate examination.
Hr. formand, der blev anmodet om en garanti mod renationalisering af landbrugspolitikken.
cult price negotiations? Mr President, I cannot of course go into too much detail, but I would like to say one thing.
Grunden til, at jeg først ankom i Strassbourg her til eftermiddag er, at jeg i formiddags holdt et foredrag i Den tyske Forbundsrepublik om landbrugsproblemer. Jeg kan forsikre Dem for, at det var et varmt møde.
This morning, I gave a talk in the Federal Republic of Germany on agricultural questions — which was the reason why I was not able to be here in Strasbourg until this afternoon.
Jeg har eftertrykkeligt meddelt at en gentagelse af det, der skete i 1984, efter Kommissionens mening for henver pris må undgås og at Kommissionen vil gøre alt for at forhindre en gentagelse.
I emphasized that in the view of the Commission a repetition of the events we faced in 1984 should be prevented at all costs and that the Commission would do its best to ensure this.
Andet kritikpunkt. Hvorfor har Kommissionen ikke fulgt Parlamentets prisforslag?
The second criticism: why did the Commission not adopt Parliament's price proposals?
Hr. formand, mindst tre eller fire gange har vi meget seriøst drøftet disse problemer.
Mr President, we had earnest discussions on this point on at least three or four occasions.
Jeg har tydeliggjort for Parlamentet, hvor for Kommissionen mener, at vi i den nuværende situation, med et kornoverskud, en overforsyningsprocent på 134, som i kun møjsommeligt og med høje omkostninger kan afsætte på verdensmarkedet, må sætte priserne ned. Det skyldes også, at der ikke er muligheder for at finde alternative anvendelser, fordi prisen for korn som basisprodukt er for høj.
I explained to Parliament why the Commission felt we had to lower prices in the current situation, a situation in which we have a surplus in cereals, an oversupply of 134%, a situation in which we are facing problems and high costs in selling on the world market, and a situation in which there is no way of finding alternative uses because the price of cereals as a raw material is too high.
Jeg har gang på gang forklaret det her i Parlamentet. Des værre har jeg ikke kunnet overbevise Parlamentet om det.
I explained all this to Parliament in detail.
I alt fald har jeg kunnet overbevise Rådet om, at det er nødvendigt at acceptere en videregående pris tilpasning end den, Parlamentet ønskede.
I was able though to convince the Council that it was necessary to accept a price adjustment going further than Parliament wanted.
Jeg kan ikke tilføje mere.
I have nothing to add on this point.
Det er Kommissionens retningslinje, på grund af forudgående beslutninger, og under hensyntagen til markedssituationen og den budget mæssige situation.
This is the line taken by die Commission on the basis of earlier decisions, taking into account the market situation and the budgetary situation.
Og jeg øjner ingen chancer til at afvige fra denne linje.
And I see no way we can deviate from this line.
Hr. formand, der er talt om de små bedrifter.
Mr President, mention was made of small farms.
Efter hånden er jeg ved at blive lidt træt af den beskyldning, at Kommissionens politik sigter mod fjerne de små familiebrug fra det europæiske landbrug.
I am gradually beginning to get tired of the accusation that the Commission's policy is to eliminate the small family business from European agriculture.
Mere eller mindre regelmæssigt hører jeg det fra en vis side i Parlamentet.
I have heard this fairly regularly from a certain part of this House.
Ved flere lejligheder har jeg gjort det klart for Parlamentet, at ét af basisprincipperne i Kommissionens landbrugspolitik er at bibeholde den sociologiske struktur i Fællesskabets landbrug, og at vi, ved hjælp af vore perspektivstudier prøver at finde ud af, hvilke betingelser der må opfyldes til det formål. Jeg kan simpelthen ikke acceptere, at der gang på gang — som om Kommissionen ikke klart har gjort rede for sin linje — insinueres, at Kommissionen vil de små brug til livs.
On several occasions here, I have made it clear that one of the basic principles of this Commission's policy is the preservation of the sociological structure of agriculture in the Community and that we are investigating what conditions need to be met for this purpose in our perspectives study.
Hr. formand, man har peget på de internationale aspekter.
Mr President, the international aspects were raised.
Man har anmodet mig om under alle om stædigheder at forsvare Fællesskabets handelsinteresser over for vore partnere i tredjelanden, især over for U.S.A. efter deres sidste aktion.
I was asked to defend the Community's commercial interests vis-à-vis our partners in third countries, in particular the United States after its latest action.
Jeg kan forsikre Dem for, at Kommissionen står inde for alt det, den har sagt i officielle erklæringer om handelspolitikken, både inden for og uden for Parlamentet.
I can assure you that the Commission stands by everything it has said in official statements in this House and out side on commercial policy.
Det betyder, at vi — uden at forfalde til en slags erklæringskrig — vil reagere adækvat, hver gang Fællesskabets handelsinteresser står på spil, og uagtet hvilket produkt, det drejer sig om, inklusive kornprodukter.
This means that we shall respond appropriately, without lapsing into a war of statements, wherever the Community's commercial interests are under pressure for whatever product, including cereals.
Hr. formand, vi kritiseres, fordi vi på et tidligere tids punkt har adskilt kompriserne fra resten af landbrugspakken. Til en vis grad accepterer jeg denne kritik.
Mr President, there was criticism of the fact that we had earlier separated cereal prices from the rest of the package.
Selvfølgelig løb man en risiko og i denne uge har risikoen i et vist omfang gjort sig gælden gældende i Rådet.
Naturally, we were taking a risk, which to a certain extent emerged in the Council this week.
Men jeg vil gerne stille ét modspørgsmål.
However, I would put one question in return.
Hvem i Parlamentet ville have taget ansvaret for at holde vore mælkeproducenter, vore kødproducenter osv. endnu længere i uvidenhed om situationen i det indeværende produktionsår, der jo allerede var i gang?
Who in this House would have been prepared to accept the responsibility for leaving our milk producers, meat producers and others any longer in a situation of uncertainty as to their marketing season, which had already started in the meantime?
Kommissionen har meget bevidst valgt at fremme disse interesser, til trods for risikoen; risici kan ikke undgås i politik.
The Commission consciously opted to defend their interests, accepting the risks; you cannot live without taking risks in politics.
Det passer derfor ikke, at vor prispolitik ene og alene kan bedømmes ud fra korneksporten, som visse par lamentsmedlemmer har påstået.
It simply isn't true that our entire prices policy can be looked at solely from the standpoint of cereals exports, as a certain section in this House has suggested.
Både med henblik på kornproduktionens almindelige afsætning på det interne marked og afsætningen til alternative formål er det nødvendigt, at prisen for korn som basisprodukt går ned, ellers kan vi godt glemme alt om bioætanol og andre lignende produkter, for der vil ikke være tilstrækkelige alternative anvendelsesmuligheder. der.
Selling cereals on the internal market or marketing cereals for alternative uses also requires a cut in the price of cereals as a raw material, otherwise we can
Så kommer spørgsmålet om budgettet.
Now the budget question.
Der er fremsat kritik af den erklæring, jeg på Kommissionens vegne aflagde for Rådet.
Criticism was expressed of the statement I made in the Council on behalf of the Commission concerning the budget.
Det kan næppe overraske Parlamentet, at jeg aflagde den erklæring.
My statement can have come as no surprise to this House.
Jeg har ved lejlighed og med lidt iltre ord måske, men det er fordi de er vore venner, henvendt mig til de tyske ansvarlige med kritik og stillet dem spørgsmål.
I have had occasion to express certain criticisms to German officials and ask them a number of questions — albeit in somewhat agitated terms, but that does not matter since they are our friends.
Men jeg vil ikke i dag sætte dem i skammekrogen og anklage dem, for selvom de nævnte deres vitale interesser, var der andre lande der ligeledes nægtede at stemme.
But I have no intention of cornering them and accusing them today, since although they invoked the vital interest clause, other countries also abstained from voting.
Og blandt dens landere der giver udtryk for deres tilsituning til den europæiske union.
These included countries which claim to support European union.
Så jeg beder Dem, det er ikke blot et tysk problem.
Thankfully, then, this is not just a German problem.
Det det drejer sig om, mine damer og herrer, det er noget der altid har dræbt de smukkeste ideer, og altid skadet demokratiet: det er kløften mellem teori og praksis.
Our problem, ladies and gentlemen, is something which has always destroyed the finest ideas and damaged democracy — the gap between words and deeds.
(Bifald) udtale mig helt konkret, fordi vi — hverken Kommissionn som institution eller jeg selv — har kunnet danne os et fuldstændigt skøn over de eventuelle muligheder eller vanskeligheder efter gårsdagens begivenheder.
I will say straight away that I cannot go into full detail, because after the events of yesterday we are naturally not in a position — that is to say neither the Commission as a collective body nor I myself is in a position — to fully assess the various possibilities and difficulties.
Det, jeg kan sige er følgende.
What I can say is the following.
Jeg sagde, at Kommissionen vil forvalte markederne som en god familiefader.
I have said that the Commission will administer the markets prudently.
Hvad betyder det?
What does this involve?
I praksis vil det betyde, at vi vil fastsætte betingelser ne på en sådan måde, at spekulation udelukkes.
In practice, this means that we shall fix the conditions for inter vention so as to prevent speculation.
Kon toret betyder det, et vi næsten ingen eller overhovedet ingen betingelser kan fastsætte, der bliver dyrere end de sidst fremkomne forslag, selv om tallene kan udvise mindre udsving.
In concrete terms, we shall thus be unable or hardly able to exceed the last proposals made, although the figures may vary somewhat in actual management of the markets.
Hvis vi handler anderledes, vil markederne blive forstyrret, og et utal af individuelle positioner og rettigheder vil komme i klemme.
Were we to act otherwise the markets would be upset and numerous individual situations and rights could be at risk.
Men det er bevarende forholdsregler.
These are preservative measures, however.
Mere end det kan vi ikke gøre, men mindre end det vil vi ikke gå med til.
We cannot do more, but we will also not do less.
Hr. formand, jeg tror ikke, at jeg på nuværende tidspunkt kan udtale mig mere præcist.
Mr President, I believe I cannot be any more precise at this stage.