natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det hilser vi med glæde. De har forsøgt at berøre mange spørgsmål, og vi anser overvidelsen af stagnationen for påtrængende nødvendig.
This regulation, to which one can attribute every virtue, is at present suffering from the lack of one essential virtue : that of being applied, because, it seems to me, it is difficult to apply it.
Og endelig fjerde spørgsmål: lufttrafikken.
It should therefore be revised.
Det er som bekendt kun få dage siden, at Kommissionen afsluttede sit memorandum herom.
That is why I have asked the Commission to let us have its proposals on the subject as quickly as possible.
Der er tale om et indviklet spørgsmål, som fortjener opmærksomhed og overvejelse.
On this question it also seems to me that we should be moving towards flexibility on certain driving hours and towards setting weekly averages and suitable rest periods.
Vi er rede til at drøfte det, selvfølgelig efter at have foretaget en nøje gennemgang af de fremsatte forslag.
Mr Seefeld (S), Chairman of the Committee on Transport. — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the President of the Council, on behalf of the Committee on Transport and no doubt also of all the Members of this House, for coming here today.
Det var, hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, hvad jeg ønske at sige forud for afholdelsen af ministerrådsmødet den 22. marts.
Parallel to this some limits should be set on working hours for drivers.
Som jeg allerede har haft lejlighed til at sige i Parlamentets transportudvalg, besjæles jeg af ønsket om at gøre konkrete fremskridt på realistisk og pragmatisk vis med henblik på problemernes løsning.
Taking into account all the operations directly associated with driving, these limits meet the requirements both of road safety and the search for economic efficiency.
Men selvfølgelig forudsætter et godt resultat alle parters indforståelse og engagement.
They are also part of the wish for social progress which must permeate transport policy, like any other.
Men måske hænger det også sammen med, at Parlamentet har anlagt passivitetssøgsmål mod Rådet af trafikministre, når der nu finder så mange rådsmøder, så mange drøftelser sted og det nu alvorligt drøftes.
In fact public opinion does not understand why the Council only gives approval to documents of a technical nature and seems to ignore the human and social aspects of problems.
Jeg har indtryk af, at vort sagsanlæg allerede har haft en positiv virkning: ministrene er vågnet op, og de forstår åbenbart, at vi mener det alvorligt.
The contacts which I have made with both sides of industry confirm me in this analysis.
Hr. rådsformand, vort sagsanlæg havde jo det formål at sætte trafikministrene i bevægelse, og det lader til, at de vil bevæge sig noget fremad.
Mr President of the Council, it is a rare event for Council representatives in the field of transport to come here.
I øvrigt mener jeg, hr. rådsformand, at vi bør måle Rådet i forhold til dets præstationer og ikke i forhold til dets erklæringer.
I remember seeing Secretaries-of-State and junior ministers among us, but in the relatively brief span of 15 years that I have been in this Parliament, may I say that you are the first Transport Minister to come to this Chamber and make a statement here. We note this with satisfaction.
Erklæringer har der tidligere været nok af — præstationer har der ikke hidtil været nogen af.
So I thank you quite officially on behalf of this House for giving us this opportunity to speak with you.
Opførelsen på dagsordenen for Deres arbejde af to vigtige spørgsmål vedrørende transporten og de heraf følgende forhandlinger vil utvivlsomt bidrage til i både bevidsthed og handling at fremme nødvendigheden af at arbejde videre i retning af en virkelig fælles transportpolitik.
It is this desire to bring our decisions closer to the everyday concerns of ordinary people that leads me to draw your attention to the final aspect of this file, namely the untiring efforts we must make to improve safety for all road users.
Således har De, hr. rådsformand, en enestående chance for at forbedre Rådet af trafikministers miserable image. De har i dag sagt, at vi har brug for konkrete beslutninger.
I am convinced that the Community can and must make efforts of the various Member States more effective by extending Community action to all the many areas of road safety.
Seefeld på Parlamentets vegne held med rådsmødet den 22. marts.
Seefeld follow-up of the activities of the Committee on Trans port over a very long period.
Jeg ønsker Dem held og lykke med Deres formandskab.
It is the seventh motion for a resolution by the Committee on Transport on the question of infrastructure.
Det ville glæde os, hvis vi ved slutningen af Deres formandskab kunne sige, at der ikke blot var blevet vekslet ord, men at vi også havde set gerninger!
It is interesting to note that the first motion for a resolution on this question dates back to 5 June 1973.
(Bifald) hvorfor vi ikke vil støtte noget med europæiske midler, hvorfor det efter vor mening ikke drejer sig om en europæisk dimension i forbindelse med den ene eller anden foranstaltning. Et samtykke giver os overhovedet ingen problemer, da den, der får noget, ikke spørger om, efter hvilke kriterier han får det.
The discussions on this question have covered such important questions as pilot programmes for infrastructure, expansion of the traffic infrastructure, the future of the railways, fixed links across the seas, improvement of Alpine cross ings, the Channel tunnel and others.
Men alle de, der står på listen, og som skal afvises af os, vil meget hurtigt spørge, med hvilken begrundelse vi afviser dem.
The Committee on Transport has been looking at these questions nonstop until the submission of this report today.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er betænkning (dok.
The Committee on Transport contacted Mr Fiterman as President of the Council.
1-1347/83) af Klinkenborg for transportudvalget om foranstaltninger med hensyn til transportinfrastrukturen i Fællesskabet.
Mr Fiterman came to the committee in his capacity of President of the Council right at the beginning of 1984, when France took over the presidency of the Council.
Det forekommer mig — det forekommer transportudvalget — at være meget lidt overbevisende.
We are pleased that you are tackling them now.
Klinkenborg (S), ordfører. — (DE) Hr. formand, mine damer og herrer, den foreliggende betænkning er en kontinuerlig fortsættelse af transportudvalgets arbejde i en meget lang periode.
This report was drawn up simply in response to a Commission report on the activities of the Committee on Infrastructures.
Det er det syvende beslutningsforslag, hvori transportudvalget behandler problemerne vedrørende infrastrukturerne.
Regrettably, that committee is in no way subject to parliamentary control and the Committee on Transport — like Parliament — has to rely on whatever reports the Commission forwards to Parliament from that committee.
Interessant nok er det første beslutningsforslag vedrørende denne problematik dateret den 5. juni 1973.
Yet the procedures of that committee may be of utmost importance to the future of the European Community in the field of transport infrastructure.
Som led i indkredsningen af denne sag er der undersøgt så vigtige spørgsmål som forsøgsprogrammer for infrastrukturerne, udbygning af transportinfrastrukturen, jernbanens fremtid, faste forbindelser over visse stræder, forbedring af alpeovergangene, tunnel under Kanalen.
The Committee on Transport happens to have a deep distrust of anything it cannot control itself and that is why we are somewhat critical of what the Commission has said about its activities.
Det er et prisværdigt skridt, da vi dermed for første gang nu også objektivt vil kunne bedømme Messina-strædet i forhold til tunnelen under Kanalen.
I am convinced, and my colleagues have gained the same impression, that you want to overcome the stagnation in transport policy. We know you have visited your colleagues.
Det er en meget specifik betænkning.
We welcome that.
Det drejer sig ikke om at fremvise nye infrastrukturforanstaltninger, men om at vurdere de gamle rigtigt.
You have tried to tackle a number of questions, and we consider it urgently necessary to overcome the stagnation.
Desværre er dette udvalg overhovedet ikke underlagt parlamentarisk kontrol, og transportudvalget — såvel som Parlamentet — er henvist til at måtte acceptere det, Kommissionen giver Parlamentet af rapporter fra udvalget.
But perhaps it is partly because this House has proceeded against the Council of Transport Ministers for failure to act that we now see so many Council meetings, so many discussions, that the matter is now being discussed seriously.
Samtidig kan dette udvalgs arbejdsmåde være af overordentlig stor betydning for Det europæiske Fællesskabs udvikling på området transportinfrastruktur.
It seems to me that our court action has already had one positive effect : the Ministers have woken up and have obviously realized that we are in earnest.
Nu nærer transportudvalget en dyb mistillid til alt, hvad det ikke selv kan kontrol lere, og derfor tager vi også kritisk stilling til det, Kommissionen har nedfældet om sit arbejde.
Mr President of the Council, the purpose of initiating proceedings was to make the Ministers of Transport get a move on, and they do seem to want to move on a bit now.
Kommissionen har ved hjælp af tre projekter forsøgt at gøre det klart, at den disponerer over en systematisk cost-benefit & na\ys & , hvorved den med det samme igen drager den nye situation og i sidste ende sig selv i tvivl.
For the rest, Mr President of the Council — if you would be so kind as to pay attention — I believe that we should measure the Council by its deeds and not by its declarations.
Jeg kommer tilbage til det senere.
We have seen enough declarations in the past, but no deeds yet.
Den skal også være grundlaget for Kommissionens arbejde.
To that end, I wish you success on behalf of this House for the Council meeting on 22 March.
Hvis det ikke sker, vil vi fremover heller ikke komme videre på dette område.
We would be happy to be able to say at the end of your presidency that it was not just an exchange of words but that we also saw deeds.
Den socialistiske gruppe vil med fuld overbevisning stemme for hr. Klinkenborgs betænkning.
These three projects are, firstly, the Channel tunnel, secondly, the Alpine tunnel and thirdly the Strait of Messina.
I betænkningen, hvorfra jeg gerne vil nævne et par punkter, er det bla. også fastsat, at de enkelte transportformers rolle og indbyrdes forhold skal fastlægges som led i en samlet europæisk koordinering.
If we compare the three costbenefit analyses with each other, as it is only sensible to do, it becomes clear that they are not comparable because they are all based on different premises.
Det er uhyre vigtigt, at det omsider afstemmes, da det er forudsætningen for den europæiske transportpolitik, vi stadig mangler. Hr. minister, De var meget imødekom-
That raises an enormous problem in terms of the allocation of budgetary resources, the problem that in the end we must be able to justify why we do not want to support some thing with European resources, why in our view one or other measure simply does not add a European dimension.
De tre projekter er for det første Kanalen, for det andet Alperne og for det tredje Messina-strædet.
Mr Klinkenborg (S), rapporteur. — (DE) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, this report is a logical
Hvis man, hvilket man vel klogt nok burde gøre, sammen ligner de tre cost-benefitanalyser med hinanden, konstaterer man: man kan overhovedet ikke sammen ligne dem, da der hele tiden lægges forskellige antagelser til grund.
Looking at the two main projects, the link across the Strait of Messina and the Channel tunnel, we can only conclude that the way the Commission has done its sums is incompatible with real policy-making, including Parliament's policy.
Dermed tydeliggøres der er et kæmpemæssigt problem, når budgetmidlerne skal stilles til rådighed, nemlig det problem at vi til syvende og sidst skal være i stand til at begrunde,
May I point out that the agricultural structure in Sicily was adjusted at the cost of considerable resources, but that in its costbenefit analysis of the link across the Strait of Messina the Commission reached the conclusion that this was not a project with a European dimension. This does not seem very rational to me, or to the Committee on
Gabert mende — det skal jeg endnu en gang sige — og skulle også være det. Deres forgængere har i de fem år, jeg har været i Parlamentet, næsten intet gjort for en europæisk transportpolitik.
Transport. That is why we propose that all projects submitted to the Commission should be measured not by some arbitrary procedure, but that objective European criteria should be formulated to evaluate costbenefit analyses.
Europa-Parlamentets søgsmål ved Domstolen mod Rådet for passivitet vil jeg gerne have lov at sige, at jeg håber, at det, han sagde, betyder, at man nu slår ind på en ny vej.
The Commission accepted this, as I said earlier, by instructing specialists to take account of this European dimension and these European criteria in evaluating the costbenefit analyses and to set them out in a Commission proposal.
Alt det, han har sagt, må jeg sige, er fuldstændig forskelligt fra det, vi tidligere har hørt fra andre trafikministre, og jeg håber, han vil overbevise sine kolleger.
That is a laudable step forward, since for the first time we would be able to assess the Strait of Messina project objectively in relation to the Channel tunnel project.
I denne betænkning behandledes også spørgsmålet om infrastrukturer, der skal afstemmes efter hinanden. Jernbanerne betegnes som en af de vigtigste transportformer.
When it implements the transport policy, to the extent that it exists at this stage, the Commission must at last play a more active part, for that is its function under the Treaty of Rome.
Europa-Parlamentet understregede det allerede den 9. marts 1982 og forlangte, at udbygningen af EFs jernbanenet skulle foretages på grundlag af den internationale jernbanesammenslutnings europæiske infrastrukturplan.
I am saying this because I believe the Commission failed to deal adequately with the situation at the Brenner Pass three weeks ago.
Kommissionen blev opfordret til at udarbejde et strækningskort under hensyntagen til de prioriterede foranstaltninger.
I still cannot understand how the Commission could tell me, when I telephoned them, that officials would be sent to the Brenner Pass in mid-March to have a look at what was going on.
Også det er en vigtig opgave for Kommissionen.
For by then it was all over and, thank God, the Ministers had acted.
Ved enhver transportplanlægning skal der tages højde for tredjelandes europæiske betydning — transitlande som f.eks. Østrig, Schweiz og Jugoslavien.
The Commission could have taken the initiative, i. e. a European transport initiative.
I forbindelse med to lande er det særlig vigtigt på grund af Grækenlands tiltrædelse af Det europæiske Fælles skab.
I want to make that quite clear today.
Min gruppe støtter Klinkenborg-betænkningen fuldt ud.
This is a very specific report.
Det er absolut af vital betydning, at der tages hensyn til fællesskabsinteressen i forbindelse med al væsentlig transportplanlægning.
It does not so much attempt to suggest new infrastructure measures as to evaluate the old ones accurately.
Det er rigtigt, at Rådet bør træffe afgørelse om det beløb, der skal anvendes, selvfølgelig i samråd med Europa-Parlamentet, og at det bør vedtage principperne for, hvordan pengene skal anvendes på EF-projekter.
That was the Committee on Transport's approach and the committee adopted the report unanimously.
Men det ville være helt forkert, hvis Rådet fik for vane år for år at udvælge forskellige projekter fra en liste, det havde fået af Parlamentet eller Kommissionen eller af en hvilken som helst anden, og besluttede sig for dette og ikke hint af rent politiske og nationalistiske grunde.
The report rightly calls for new motorway projects to be examined critically, on the basis of specific criteria : the shortage of funds in general, the possible destruction or damage of the countryside, the danger of emissions and pollutants and of the transfer of heavy goods traffic from road to rail or internal waterway, and combined transport.
Den skal afgøres på grundlag af tekniske hensyn og rimelighed og ikke på et politisk grundlag.
I think these important aspects must be taken into consideration in all future transport policy planning.
Jeg siger dette, fordi jeg tror, at Kommissionen svigtede under behandlingen af situationen ved Brenner-passet for tre uger siden.
Mr Gabert (S). — (DE) Mr President, honourable Members, I would like to begin by congratulating Mr Klinkenborg on his excellent report.
Jeg har aldrig forstået, hvordan Kommissionen på en telefonisk forespørgsel kunne erklære over for mig, at man i midten af mans ville sende embedsmænd til Brenner, for at de kunne undersøge, hvad der var på færde dér.
It is a most important report and must form the basis of our future transport policy, which we were gratified to hear Minister Fiterman discuss today.
Da var alt jo allerede forbi, og ministrene havde gudskelov handlet.
It must also form the basis of the Commission's activities.
Den socialistiske gruppe ser også med glæde på betænkningens krav — som hr. Klinkenborg tidligere har påpeget — om at opstille ens kriterier for en cojí-¿e»e/Í£analyse og den europæiske betydning af infrastrukturforanstaltningerne for de enkelte transportformer.
The Socialist Group also welcomes the request made in the report, and which Mr Klinkenborg repeated a few moments ago, to formulate common criteria for costbenefit analysis and for assessing the Community interest of all transport infrastructure measures.
Kommissionen bør tage denne betænkning meget alvorligt; det samme gælder Rådet.
The Commission should look at this report very seriously, and so should the Council of Ministers.
Jeg tillader mig at gentage: denne betænkning skal være grundlaget for fremtidige transportpolitiske overvejelser. På dette grundlag vil den socialistiske gruppe stemme for betænkningen.
May I repeat that this report must serve as the foundation for future transport policy planning.
Jeg er meget enig med det, hr. Seefeld sagde om, at rådsformanden er til stede og har været så positiv.
It is extremely important to coordinate them at last, since that is the condition for creating a European transport policy, which we still lack.
Må jeg slutte med at sige, at der var én ting, jeg ikke syntes om af det, rådsformanden sagde.
Mr Minister, I repeat that you were most cooperative, as indeed you had to be.
Han gav os det indtryk, at vi kun skal stræbe mod de mest betydningsfulde projekter, man overhovedet kan forestille sig.
During my five years as a Member of this Parliament, your predecessors hardly did anything to further European transport policy.
Han sagde ikke lige netop det, men det var det indtryk, han gav os, som om han kun tænkte på tunneler og Messina-strædet og lignende kolossale projekter.
Mr Turner (ED). — Mr President, may I first of all thank the President-in-Office of the Council for coming here and giving such a positive speech.
I EF kan man jo på to hænder tælle antallet af projekter, der er så store.
Without prejudice to the European Parliament's action against the Council of Ministers for doing nothing in the Court of Justice, may I say that I hope that what he said means that they are turning over a new leaf.
Må jeg venligst opfordre ham til også at tage hensyn til de mindre projekter, hvor vi har flaskehalse af lignende betydning.
Everything he has said, I must say, is totally different from what we have heard before from other Ministers of Transport, and I hope that he will convince his colleagues.
Det kan meget vel være at en flaskehals er katastrofal for trafikken i EF, men arbejdet behøver ikke at være så stort.
My group supports the Klinkenborg report entirely. It is absolutely vital that the Community view should be taken into account in all major transport planning.
Det er muligt, at den pågældende nationale regering ikke vil tage de nødvendige skridt, og derfor bør EF presse på og gøre det selv.
It is right that the Council of Ministers should decide the amount of money that should be spent, in concert of course with the European Parliament, and that they should agree the principles upon which that money should be spent on EEC projects.
Hvis jeg ud fra min egen erfaring lige må komme med et personligt synspunkt: havnene langs Englands østkyst er ikke særlig
But it would be quite wrong if the Council got into the habit of selecting year by year different projects from a list given to them by the Parliament or by the Commis-
Turner (ED). — (EN) Hr. formand, må jeg allerførst takke rådsformanden for at være til stede og for at have holdt en så positiv tale.
The European Parliament pointed that out as early as 9 March 1982, calling for the expansion of the EEC railway network on the basis of the European infrastructure master plan drawn up by the International Union of Railways.
Uden præjudice for
That is also an important task for the Commission.
hindringer, og vi føler ærlig talt ikke, at vi kan slutte os til de mange, som i disse dage med en god portion overfladiskhed har udtalt, at en enkel demonstration af god vilje ville være tilstrækkeligt til at ophæve kontrollen ved grænserne.
\ sion or by anyone else and deciding on this and not on that on purely political and nationalistic grounds.
Ophævelsen eller blot forenklingen af grænsekontrollen kræver i realiteten en stærk politisk vilje fra Ministerrådets side, fordi det kræver beslutninger, som indeholder aspekter, der vedrører de enkelte landes skatte-, handels- og industripolitik.
I hope very much that the President-in-Office of the Council will make it clear to his colleagues that their job is not to pick and choose amongst a list of projects what they think they want to carry out but to agree the principles and leave the Commission, with the advice of the European Parliament, to get on with the specific job of choosing specific projects and their priorities.
Planlægning på transportområdet er ensbetydende med i store træk af definere de forskellige transport måders opgaver og respektive roller, hvilket inde bærer, at Rådet skal nå frem til "politisk konsensus om de vigtigste bestanddele af en fælles transportpolitik.
Planning for transport means that the respective jobs and roles of different modes of transport have to be defined in broad outline, which implies that the Council will have to reach a political consensus on the principal elements of a common transport policy.
Med henblik på fastsættelse af prioriteringerne ud fra de forskellige infrastrukturprojekter, som givetvis alle er interessante, men hvor der ikke desto mindre må træffes valg, håber vi, at Kommissionen vil udarbejde en ramme for bedømmelsen af målene, som omfatter uomtvistelige og sammenlignelige kriterier ved hjælp af en analyse af omkostninger og fordele for hvert enkelt projekt.
In order to set priorities in terms of different infrastructure projects, which are certainly all of interest but from which a selection has to be made, we hope that the Commission will work out a framework for the evaluation of objectives which will contain objective and mutually comparable criteria, with the help of a costbenefit analysis for each project.
Derigennem vil Europa-Parlamentet råde over alle bedømmelseselementer til at kunne træffe et altid vanskeligt valg, der ikke blot indskrænker sig til en ratificering, som vi så tit har oplevet det, af projekter, der er blevet til uden om Parlamentet og uden forudgående høring.
In this way the European Parliament will have all the facts needed for an assessment so that it will be able to make a choice, however delicate, and not just confine itself as has so often been the case, to ratifying projects prepared outside Parliament and without any prior consultation.
Altså er der tale om en demokratisk fremgangsmåde.
It is a question of the democratic process.