natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den samlede udgift til den fælles landbrugspolitik er på 22,5 mia ECU, og Kommissionen foreslår, at vi sparer maksimalt ca. 2,5%.
Total CAP expenditure stands at 22.5 billion ECU and the Commission proposes we save about 2.5% at the maximum.
Er det virkelig den re form, vi som et Fællesskab ønsker.
Is this really the reform we are looking for as a Community?
Vi har ikke set nogen forslag til sociostrukturelle foranstaltninger, selv om hr. Andriessen omtalte nogle i formiddags — men det var for sent til, at vi kunne tage hensyn til dem og tænke over dem.
We have no social structural proposals, although we heard Mr Andriessen this morning — but too late for us to take any account of them and to reflect on them.
Dette er grunden til, at jeg har kaldt Kommissionens forslag et et-benet uhyre og til, at jeg tror, de er kraftesløse og ikke tager sigte på de reelle problemer, vi har på produktionssiden.
This is why I have called the Com mission's proposals a one-legged creature and why I believe also that they are emaciated and do not address the real problems we have on the production side.
Vi anerkender selvfølgelig alle, at vi må have styr på de overskud, vi bliver ved med at skabe.
Of course, we all accept that we must control the surpluses we are continuing to create.
Hvis forslagene kunne hjælpe landbrugerne, ville de fleste af os kunne støtte dem.
If the proposals helped farmers, most of us would be able to support them.
Hvis de kunne hjælpe skatteborgeren og udviklingen af Det europæiske Fællesskab, så ville det naturligvis være endnu en fordel, og vi ville alle gå ind for dem.
If they helped the taxpayer and the development of the European Community, of course that would be an added advantage, and we would all go along with them.
Men Kommissionens forslag gør faktisk meget lidt for at afhjælpe situationen.
But the proposals from the Commission do very little indeed to help the situation.
Der er meget få nye tanker.
There are very few new ideas.
Jeg mener, at vi som et resultat af det dårlige vejr sidste år har brug for en eller anden form for katastrofehjælpsfond i Det europæiske Fællesskab.
I believe that as a result of the bad weather last year we need some kind of direct disaster relief fund for the European Com munity.
I vor debat er vi ikke rigtig kom met ind til kernen i hr. Andriessens forslag, nemlig den medansvarsafgift, som han siger ikke vil hjælpe med til at kontrollere produktionen, og vi må derfor spørge, hvorfor forslagene henviser til de pågældende artikler i traktaterne og ikke til den relevante artikel i budgettet, nemlig artikel 202.
In our debate we have not really got down to the nub of Mr Andriessen's proposals, namely the coresponsibility levy which he says will not help con trol production and we therefore have to question why they are written under the articles of the Treaties that they are written under, rather than under the budget ary article, namely Article 202.
Provan (ED), ordfører. — (EN) Fru formand, det er uheldigt, at hr. Andriessen ikke har fået lejlighed til at opsummere denne debat.
Mr Tolman (PPE), chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. — (NL) Madam President, I asked for the floor to protest on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food against the way things are going, and I will explain exactly why.
Det har været en nyttig debat, og det er første gang, vi har haft en drøftelse af landbrugspriser i Parlamentet.
I quite appreciate that we are dealing with a special situation as a result of the exceptional events that have occurred.
Det finder jeg meget besynderligt.
I do not need to dwell on that.
Efter at have brugt så lang tid på at blive enige om en ordning, undlader vi nu at benytte den.
A proposal for a different schedule was made today, and it was approved.
Er det virkelig en korrekt og ansvarlig holdning hos folk, der formodes at tage sig af forsyningssituationen inden for landbrugsproduktion?
I therefore feel that, despite the other important matters on the agenda, we should ask that the Commissioner be allowed 20 to 30 minutes to give Parliament a reasonable answer.
Afvikling af lagrene — ja, selvfølgelig ønsker vi det.
As the Commissioner has already said, this is the second time this has happened.
Vi vil kun gøre situationen endnu værre, og det vil koste flere penge.
We have a right to that, Madam President.
Anden og fuglen skændtes om, hvem af dem der var en rigtig fugl.
After having taken such a long time to agree to a mechanism, we are now failing to use it.
Anden sagde, at den var en rigtig fugl, og at den »rigtige« fugl ikke var en rigtig fugl, fordi den ikke kunne svømme.
Is that really correct and responsible for people who are supposed to be looking after the supply side of agricultural production?
Og fuglen sagde : » Du kan ikke flyve ordentligt «.
Destocking — yes, of course we want that.
Både her i eftermiddag og i formiddags er der til stadighed under debatten blevet henvist til artikel 39 i Romtraktaten, som vi naturligvis alle må respektere.
President. — I am grateful to you, Mr Tolman, for having made that comment, and I understand the reactions of the House.
Vi har fået en masse nyttige bidrag til debatten i dag.
think it is extremely discourteous to Commissioner Andriessen.
Og jeg takker alle ordfører ne for udtalelserne for at have forelagt dem her i dag.
May I examine this matter during Question Time and see if we can reach a compromise.
En af kommentarerne gjorde et stort indtryk på mig, og det var, at det at gentage en mytt ikke gør den til en realitet.
I find myself in a very unenviable position, I must tell you.
Jeg tror, vi må vende os mod nogle realiteter i fremtiden.
Perhaps the Commissioner would state whether or not he can accept this?
Andriessen, næstformand i Kommissionen. — (NL) Fru formand, De har bemærket, at jeg i vid udstrækning er rede til at rette mig efter Parlamentets afgørelser.
Mr Andriessen, Vice-President of the Commission. — (NL) Madam President, as you will have noted, I am generally prepared to comply with Parliament's decisions.
Det har jeg måttet gøre på en noget negativ måde, da jeg sagde, at jeg ikke kunne besvare en hel dags forhandling på to minutter.
I found it necessary to make this clear in a somewhat negative way, by saying that I could not reply to a debate lasting a day in two minutes.
Jeg er rede til at fortsætte forhandlingen om landbrugspriserne any time.
I am willing to continue the debate on farm prices at any time.
Det afhænger af Parlamentet.
It is up to Parliament.
Jeg håber, at vi nu kan fortsætte.
I would hope that we can carry on now.
I mellemtiden vil vi undersøge, om det i det mindste er muligt at foretage denne tilpasning af dagsordenen.
I have some announcements to make and, so that we do not take up any more time, would Members agree to get on with the announcements and Question Time?
Eyraud (S). — (FR) Fru formand, jeg har bedt om ordet til forretningsordenen, idet det indlæg, jeg vil komme med, drejer sig om drøftelsen af landbrugs priserne og spørgetiden.
Mr Eyraud (S). — (FR) Madam President, I wish to speak to a procedural motion, what I have to say being concerned with the debate on farm prices and Question Time.
Jeg har stillet et spørgsmål til Kommissionen, som skulle behandles som nr. 10 i spørgetiden.
Mr Cryer (S). — I wonder if the Commissioner could say whether the cost of the 20 000 tonnes of cereals distributed to Ethiopia and listed on page 12 of the report has been set against the development budget.
Men for mandskabet — jeg har brevet fra Parlamentets for mand — svarede mig, at dette spørgsmål ville blive behandlet sammen med landbrugspriserne. Imidlertid har kommissæren ikke talt om det problem, som interesserer mig i dette spørgsmål.
If this is the case, as he indicated was the general rule on the last occasion we had an exchange, why is it not possible for the Commission to distribute this food free of any charge whatsoever to internal funds because the cost of keeping these mountains is enormous?
Følgelig vil jeg både på egne vegne og som næstformand for land brugsudvalget støtte forslaget fra udvalgets formand, hr. Tolman, og jeg for min del ønsker, at der bliver en drøftelse efter spørgetidens afslutning, og at kom missær Andriessen får ordet, og det vil jeg da gerne på forhånd sige lak for.
Heaving read his last reply to myself, I have the impression he wants to hide the information rather than use it as an opportunity of accountability for the Commission's actions and if that is indeed the case, then I can only say that he will be the subject of a great deal of criticism because the policy of distribution of the food mountains falls short of anything approaching desirable.
Det har jeg også forståelse for. Men havde landbrugsudvalget på det tids punkt vidst, at der ikke længere ville være tid til et svar fra kommissæren, der har siddet hele dagen og lyttet til os, så var forslaget ikke blevet vedtaget.
I had put a question to the Commission, which was to have been taken as Question No 10 during Question Time.
Det er, som kom missæren sagde, anden gang, at det sker. Det kan vi ikke acceptere som landbrugsudvalg.
In a letter which I have to hand, the presidency of Parliament told me that this question would be taken with the debate on farm prices.
Derfor mit for slag om at give kommissæren lejlighed til at svare. Det har vi ret til, fru formand.
However, the Commissioner has not mentioned the problem that I raise in this question.
Sherlock (ED). — (EN) Jeg vil gerne, specielt på bag grund af det synspunkt, der er fremført af formanden for udvalget om landbrug, fiskeri og ernæring, og af den elskværdige måde, hvorpå hr. Andriessen har imødekommet Deres anmodning om hjælp, foreslå et andet alternativ, og det er, at vi få, vi få udvalgte, stemmer for at høre kommissær Andriessen inden spørgetiden.
Consequently, speaking in my own name and as vice-chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, I support the proposal made by the chairman, Mr Tolman, and hope for my own part that there will be a discussion at the end of Question Time and that Commissioner Andriessen will speak, for which I thank him in anticipation.
Formanden. — Jeg vil bede Dem om at overveje det forslag, jeg oprindelig fremsatte, dog ikke uden hen syntagen til hr. Sherlocks forslag. Sagen er, at vi ikke kan gå imod den beslutning, der blev truffet tidligere
Mr Sherlock (ED). — I would like, particularly in view of the opinion expressed by the chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the very gracious way in which Mr Andriessen has responded to your request for assistance, to put forward another alternative and that is that we few, we very
Jeg finder det ikke rigtigt at forsøge at gøre det nu, da vi allerede har beslaglagt næsten ti minutter af spørgetiden med en sag, der ikke henhører under » Kommissionens reaktion «.
In conclusion, may I add that the Commission will produce a communication to the Council with its con clusions on the basis of the reports, accompanied if necessary by proposals for future action.
på dagen af Parlamentet, og som går ud på, at der skal være en times spørgetid.
raising a substantive issue for debate which should properly be handled in a debate on the issue.
Hvis De vil tillade mig at fortsætte snarest muligt med den, så ville det være muligt, hvis tjenesterne og gruppeformændene er ind forstået, at komme videre.
He will also be aware of the fact that the Commission has never been slow to stand over its policy in regard to development and has, indeed, a lot to be proud of.
Kommissæren har været så venlig at gå ind på, at vi fortsætter i endnu en halv time, så han får lejlighed til at svare.
He will be aware of the fact that the issue he has raised on this occasion is similar to the issue he has raised on previous occasions and which I fully answered.
Formanden. — Næste punkt på dagsordenen er med delelse fra Kommissionen om dens reaktion på Europa-Parlamentets udtalelser og forslag (2).
With regard to the overall issue he has raised, the Commission will be, at any stage, willing, able and indeed anxious to expand on its policy on develop ment aid.
Faith (ED). — (EN) Jeg ved ikke, om kommissæren i sin erklæring har fortalt os om resultaterne af drøftelserne i det ekspertudvalg, der blev nedåt i september efter en forhandling i Europa-Parlamentet om Sellafield.
Following the report presented by our colleague Mr Croux, we voted virtually unanimously in favour of a motion for a resolution containing an amendment inviting Member States to stop importing coal from South Africa.
Naturligvis er dette ikke tilfældet for Sellafield, der holder sig pænt til Fællesskabets nor mer.
I should like to ask the Commission what action it intends to take on this amendment, in other words how it intends to give effect to the will expressed on that occasion by the European Parliament. ment.
Cryer (S). — (EN) Mon kommissæren kan sige, om udgifterne til de 20 0001 korn, der er uddelt i Etiopien, og som omtales på side 12 i dokumentet, er blevet modregnet i udviklingsbudgettet?
Mr Sutherland, Member of the Commission. — The issue raised by the honourable Member is being con sidered by the Commission in the light of the powers available to it.
Hvis det er tilfældet — og sidste gang vi havde en drøftelse af det, sagde han, at det var den almindelige regel — hvorfor er det så ikke muligt for Kommissionen at fordele disse fødevarer uden nogen som helst belastning for de interne fonde, idet udgifterne til disse bjerge er enorme?
It is not in a position to make an unambiguous statement in regard to the ability or the power to prohibit the importation of coal from South Africa into the Community.
Clinton Davis, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) For det første vil jeg gerne sige, at jeg meget beklager, at en fortrolig rapport, som Kommissionen havde udbedt sig fra et uafhængigt organ som reaktion på en uro, der havde fundet udtryk i Parlamentet, sivede ud til pressen.
Mrs Faith (ED). — I wonder if, in his statement, the Commissioner has told us the results of the deliberation of the expert committee which was set up last September following a debate in the European Parliament concerning Sellafield.
Denne læk er så meget mere irriterende, som jeg ikke accepterer visse dele af rapporten og allerede havde bedt de sagkyndige om at mødes igen, så at jeg kunne drøfte nogle af deres resultater med dem.
Would he confirm that the expert committee concluded that doses of radiation from the plant were very low indeed compared with those received from the natural environment, and also that the committee firmly opposed the setting up of a European nuclear inspectorate because, if discharges from Sellafield exceeded Community limits the Com mission could take the government to the European Court?
Dette møde fandt sted i fredags, som det ærede medlem netop sagde.
Of course, this is not the case with Sellafield, which is acting well within the Community limits.
Jeg håber at modtage udvalgets fornyede overvejelser inden Deres næste mødeperiode.
President. — I have an announcement to make.
Jeg vil holde det løfte, jeg gav forsamlingen, og offentliggøre rapporten, når Kommissionen har taget stilling til de rejste problemer.
I am sure you will wish me to express our gratitude to Commissioner Andriessen that he has agreed to make a statement in reply to the debate on Thursday morning at 10 a.m. before the vote.
Sutherland, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Hr. Cryer vil ikke blive overrasket, når han hører, at jeg afviser dette spørgsmål, da det ikke rettelig hører hjemme under »Kommissionens reaktion«.
Mr Clinton Davis, Member of the Commission. — First of all may I say how much I deplore the fact that a confidential report requested by the Commission from an independent body in response to concerns expressed by this Parliament was leaked to the press.
Han rejser et væsentligt spørgsmål, som bør behandles i en regulær drøftelse af sagen.
The leak is made all the more annoying by the fact that I do not accept certain parts of the report and had already asked the experts to reconvene in order that I might discuss with them some of their findings.
Han vil også vide, at Kom missionen aldrig har været sen til at indestå for sin udviklingspolitik, og at den da også har en masse at være stolt af.
The meeting took place last Friday, as the honourable Member has just stated.
Han vil vide, at det spørgsmål, han rejste ved denne lejlighed, er det samme som et spørgsmål, han har rejst ved tidligere lejligheder, og som jeg udførligt har besvaret.
I asked the experts then to reconsider their report in the light of a number of factors: the recent incidents at Sellafield, the views expressed by this House and in Member States, and views expressed by the public at large.
Afslutningsvis vil jeg gerne tilføje, at Kommissionen vil udarbejde en meddelelse til Rådet med sine konklusioner på grundlag af rapporten, om nødvendigt ledsaget af forslag om fremtidig aktion.
Mr Lalor (RDE). — Madam President, I want to say that I was extremely disappointed with Mr Clinton Davis's reaction.
Hvad angår det generelle spørgsmål, han rejste, vil Kommissionen på ethvert stadium være villig og i
I now have to adjust my question to ask him if this is the positive reaction which he promised last month in view of the independent scientific experts' appraisal of the reports which had already been prepared at his request.
Chambeiron (COM). — (FR) I sidste måned havde man bedt os om at afgive udtalelse om den nye støtteordning for kulindustrien.
Is it his positive reaction to the request from Tánaiste Spring for action under the Euratom Treaty?
(') Aktuel og uopsættelig debat (bekendtgørelse af listen over op førte emner) — Ophævelse af et medlems parlamentariske immunitet — Parlamentets sammensætning: se protokollen.
Will he not do what we would have expected him to have done after three months, i.e., confirm his request calling for the closure of Sellafield? field?
Efter behandling af betænkningen af hr. Croux vedtog vi så godt som enstemmigt et forslag til beslutning,
Mr Clinton Davis, Member of the Commission. — I fear that the honourable Member does not in fact approach
Chambeiron i stand til eller ikke at komme nærmere ind på de tvivl, han talte om med hensyn til rapporten fra hans ekspertudvalg?
Davis this matter with the seriousness that I would have hoped for.
hvori der fandtes et ændringsforslag, som opfordrede medlemsstaterne til at indstille deres kulimport fra Sydafrika.
What I have done is to convene a meeting of experts in the light of reports which have been presented to me, about which I have certain doubts, as I have already said.
Clinton Davis, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Det vil jeg absolut gerne gøre.
It is only courteous to those experts who have produced reports that I should consider their position with them.
Det er uafhængige eksperter, og det vil derfor være rigtigt, at de får en passende lejlighed til at svare.
That I have done and I now await their response.
Den er ikke i stand til at afgive en utvetydig erklæring med hensyn til sin evne eller beføjelse til at forbyde kulimport fra Sydafrika i Fællesskabet.
Why were these documents not made available during the debate so that we might have a better basis for our discussion, and why have we still not received them through the formal channels?
Jeg kan ikke give andre oplysninger om reaktionen på dette stadium, men vil se på det igen og sætte mig i forbindelse med det ærede medlem.
These proposals have now been circulating in the Member States for three weeks, we have been asked many questions about them, we have received them through unofficial channels, but they have not yet been submitted to us formally.
Hindley (S). — (EN) Må jeg henlede medlemmernes opmærksomhed på oplysningerne om fødevarehjælp ydet i marts.
Mrs Crawley (S). — To follow on Mr Lalor's question, could the Commissioner please say whether or not he is in a position to enlarge on the doubts that he has spoken of regarding the report from his committee of experts.
Der er under dette punkt ikke noget om nogen hjælp til Somalia.
My second question concerns the content of these proposals.
Den 28. marts fik det stor omtale i den britiske presse, at chefen for Somalias regerings flygtningekontor sagde, at der i nogle områder kun var mad tilbage til et par dage.
We fully appreciate — and this was also made clear during the debate — that all the Member States will have to make sacrifices for Spain and Portugal.
Han blev desuden citeret for, at appeller om hjælp var stødt på døve øren.
Madam President, during the debate we called for balanced distri bution of solidarity, but there is absolutely no sign of that.
Lalor (RDE). — (EN) Jeg vil gerne sige, at jeg var overordentlig skuffet over hr. Clinton Davis' reaktion.
Mr Sutherland, Member of the Commission. — Mrs Waij-Weggen, I think, will understand my answer to her.
Vil han ikke gøre det, vi forventede at han havde gjort efter tre måneder, nemlig gentage sin opfordring til lukning af Sellafield?
They would require a full and detailed debate and are not appropriate for an answer on action taken by the Commission.
Maij-Weggen (PPE). — (NL) Jeg vil gerne stille et spørgsmål på baggrund af den debat, vi havde i sidste måned om retningslinjerne for den europæiske social fond.
With regard to the documentation, all I can say is that all the documentation that is relevant to Parliament and should be made available to it will be made available to it.
Clinton Davis, medlem af Kommissionen. — (EN) Jeg er bange for, at det ærede medlem faktisk ikke ser på denne sag med den seriøsitet, jeg kunne have håbet.
Mr Hindley (S). — Could I draw Members' attention to the information on emergency aid granted in the month of March.
Det er kun høflighed over for de sagkyndige, der har udarbejdet rapporten, når jeg drøfter deres holdning med dem.
On 28 March it was widely quoted in the British press that the head of the Somali Government Refugees' Agency said there was only enough food left in certain areas to last a few days.
Det har jeg gjort, og jeg afventer nu deres svar.
He was further quoted as saying that appeals for aid had fallen on deaf ears.
Jeg har to spørgsmål om det: for det første fik vi umiddelbart efter mødeperioden i sidste måned indi rekte dokumenter på bordet med fuldstændige forslag til revision af socialfonden.
With regard to the equalization of treatment of people in the Community in regard to disbursements from the Social Fund, Mrs Maij-Weggen will be aware that the Social Fund is disbursed on the basis of project-by-project analyses and on the basis of an objective assessment.
Hvorfor var disse dokumenter ikke til rådighed under forhandlingen, så at vi havde kunnet drøfte det på et mere oplyst grundlag, og hvorfor har vi stadig ikke modtaget dem ad de officielle kanaler?
Any disbursements made by the Commission will be made on that basis — that is, fairly and properly in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Hvad angår Irlands vicepremierminister, så havde han og jeg såre frugtbare drøftelser — hvad han vil være den første til at bekræfte — og derfor er den antydning, det ærede medlem kom med, om arten af den diskussion der fandt sted, med respekt at melde ikke en korrekt fremstilling af kendsgerningerne.
Mr Natali, Vice-President of the Commission. — (IT) The Commission has received the appeals to which the honourable Member refers, and is at present studying a number of urgent measures to help Somalia, both as regards aid for the refugees and for a solution to the problems connected with the Somali population.
Crawley (S). — (EN) I fortsættelse af hr. Lalors spørgsmål : Vil kommissæren venligst sige, om han er
Mrs Maij-Weggen (PPE). — (NL) What I want to ask follows on from the debate we had last month about the guidelines for the European Social Fund.
Vi forstår godt — og det blev også gjort klart under debatten — at alle medlemsstater i nogen grad skulle afgive noget til Spanien og Portugal.
Mr Chanterie (PPE). — (NL) Madam President, I am glad I can put my question immediately after Mrs Maij-Weggen's because it concerns the same sub ject.