natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
DEFF øger fokus på Open Access i DEFF konsortielicenser Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i DEFFs licensarbejde og i de internationale samarbejder, hvori DEFF indgår, sættes fokus på forhandling af forfatterafgifter i forbindelse med gylden Open Access, frihed til grøn Open Access og transparente forretningsmodeller for Open Access-publicering mod betaling. 
DEFF increases focus on Open Access in DEFF consortium licenses The Open Access Committee recommends that in DEFF's work with licences and in the international partnerships in which DEFF takes part, focus be directed at negotiation of authors' royalties in connection with golden Open Access, freedom to green Open Access, and transparent business models for Open Access publishing at a fee.
Dansk medlemskab af centrale internationale samarbejdsfora for håndtering og langtidsbevaring af videnskabelig information i bredeste forstand indgås Open Access Udvalget anbefaler dansk medlemskab af og deltagelse i de tre vigtige internationale samarbejdsfora på området, The Alliance for Permanent Access, DataCite og CESSDA ERIC. 
Danish membership of central international collaboration forums for handling and long-term preservation of scientific information in the widest sense The Open Access Committee recommends Danish membership of and participation in the three most important international collaboration forums in the field, i.e. The Alliance for Permanent Access, DataCite and CESSDA ERIC.
Open Access til videnskabelige publikationer betyder, at der er uhindret og vederlagsfri adgang (fremover udtrykt ved fri adgang) for hele verden til at læse og anvende resultaterne, og at man kan lagre kopier af peer reviewed videnskabelige artikler i repositorier 
Open Access to scientific publications means unhindered and free-of-charge access (from here on termed ‘Open Access') for the entire world to read and use the results and that copies of peerreviewed scientific articles can be stored in repositories.
1. Fri adgang kan skabes ved grøn eller 
1 Free access can be created by means of
gylden Open Access. 
green or golden Open Access.
Samtidig tillader mange internationale tidsskrifter allerede den form for parallelpublicering af peer reviewed artikler, som grøn Open Access repræsenterer 
Furthermore, many international journals already permit the form of parallel publishing of peer-reviewed articles that green Open Access represents.
Regeringen har ved videnskabsministeren tiltrådt Ministerrådets konklusioner om videnskabelig information i den digitale tidsalder 
The Government, represented by the Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, has approved the Council of the European Union's conclusions about scientific information in the digital age.
I kommissoriet4 for det nationale arbejde med Open Access er følgende opgaver angivet for Open Access Udvalget: 
In the mandate4 for the national work with Open Access, the following assignments are stated for the Open Access Committee:
1) At planlægge implementeringen af Ministerrådets konklusioner 
1) Planning the implementation of the Council of the European Union's conclusions
2) I forbindelse med planlægningen skal udvalget afklare: a) Hvordan offentligt finansieret forskning gøres offentligt tilgængeligt online b) Hvilke økonomiske konsekvenser der er forbundet med dette c) Hvordan implementeringen sikres opbakning fra danske forskere d) Hvilken rolle de forskningsfinansierende organer skal have i forbindelse med implementeringen e) Hvordan der tages højde for afklaring af ophavsretslige spørgsmål 
2) In connection with the planning, the Committee must clarify: a) How publicly funded research can be made publicly available online b) The financial consequences associated with this c) How support for the implementation can be secured from Danish researchers d) Which role the research funding bodies are to have in connection with the implementation e) How to allow for clarification of copyright issues
3) At gennemføre planlægningen af Ministerrådets konklusioner 
3) Accomplishing the planning of the Council of the European Union's conclusions
4) Forberede henvendelse til EU-kommissæren for Forskning og Innovation samt EU-kommissæren for Informationssamfundet og Medierne med en opfordring til, at kommissærerne udarbejder et fælles europæisk udspil til forlagsbranchen om Open Access-publicering. 
4) Preparing an approach to the EU Commissioner for Research and Innovation and the EU Commissioner for the Information Society and the Media with a request that the commissioners prepare a joint European proposal to the publishing industry about Open Access publishing.
Bo Öhrström, vicedirektør, DEFF, Styrelsen for Bibliotek og Medier (formand) 
Bo Öhrström, Deputy Director, DEFF, Danish Agency for Libraries and Media (Chairman)
Birte Christensen-Dalsgaard, vicedirektør, Det Kongelige Bibliotek 
Birte Christensen-Dalsgaard, Deputy Director, The Royal Library
Niels-Henrik Gylstorff, overbibliotekar, Aalborg Universitet 
Niels-Henrik Gylstorff, Head Librarian, Aalborg University
Carsten Riis, dekan, Aarhus Universitet 
Carsten Riis, Dean, Aarhus University
Mogens Sandfær, direktør, DTIC, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet 
Mogens Sandfær, Director, DTIC, Technical University of Denmark
Grete M. Kladakis, kontorchef, Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen 
Grete M. Kladakis, Head of Department, Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation
Anders Bjørneboe, chefkonsulent, Universitets- og Bygningsstyrelsen 
Anders Bjørneboe, Chief Consultant, Danish University and Property Agency
Morten Rosenmeier, formand for Udvalget til Beskyttelse af Videnskabeligt Arbejde 
Morten Rosenmeier, Chairman of the Committee for the Protection of Scientific Work
Nikolaj Borg Burmeister, chefkonsulent, Danske Universiteter (observatør) 
Nikolaj Borg Burmeister, Chief Consultant, Danish Universities (Observer)
Open Access Udvalget har på baggrund af en række interne arbejdsmøder samt et møde med Forlæggerforeningen i februar 2010 udarbejdet en første version af rapporten Anbefalinger til implementering af Open Access i Danmark - Rapport fra Open Access Udvalget. 
The Open Access Committee has prepared the first version of the report Recommendations for Implementation of Open Access in Denmark - Report from the Open Access Committee based on a number of internal work meetings and a meeting with the Danish Publishers Association in February 2010.
Open Access Udvalget har i sit arbejde taget udgangspunkt i Berlin-deklarationens 5 definition af 
The Open Access Committee has based its work on the Berlin Declaration's 5 definition of Open
Open Access: “Open Access contributions must satisfy two conditions: 
Access:“Open Access contributions must satisfy two conditions:
2. A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in an appropriate standard electronic format is deposited (and thus published) in at least one online repository using suitable technical standards (such as the Open Archive definitions) that is supported and maintained by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, inter operability, and long-term archiving.” 
2. A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in an appropriate standard electronic format is deposited (and thus published) in at least one online repository using suitable technical standards (such as the Open Archive definitions) that is supported and maintained by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable Open Access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.”
Uanset metode betyder Open Access fri adgang til forskningsresultater, en øget synlighed og dermed øgede anvendelsesmuligheder af forskningsresultater - i forhold til det nuværende system, hvor adgangen er begrænset til de organisationer, der har råd til at betale for adgangen. 
Regardless of the method, Open Access means free access to research results, increased visibility and thus possibilities for increased utilisation of research results - in comparison to the present system where access is limited to the organisations that can afford to pay for access.
Open Access Udvalget har ikke ønsket at komme med anvisninger på, hvordan den enkelte forskningsinstitution kan tilrettelægge en overgang til Open Access. 
The Open Access Committee has not wished to suggest how the individual research institution should organise a transition to Open Access.
En sådan overgang vil afspejle den enkelte institutionsledelses forsknings- og formidlingsstrategiske overvejelser og kan således ikke sættes på en fælles formel. 
Such a transition will reflect the individual institution's management's research and dissemination strategic considerations and therefore, it cannot be reduced to a
Nogle af anbefalingerne er af politisk og strategisk karakter, mens andre er praksisorienterede og kan bidrage med ny og nødvendig viden omkring etablering og sikring af fri adgang til data og publikationer - også i et langtidsperspektiv. 
Some of the recommendations are of political and strategic character, while others are more practiceorientated and may contribute new and necessary knowledge about the establishment and ensuring of Open Access to data and publications - including in a long-term perspective.
Grøn Open Access har fået øget global opmærksomhed de senere år og er en hurtig og kosteffektiv metode til at opnå fri adgang til accepterede og kvalitetssikrede artikler. 
Green Open Access has been paid increased global interest in recent years, and it is a fast and costeffective method for achieving Open Access to accepted and quality assured articles.
Grøn Open Access er ikke en ændring af peer review, som den foregår i dag, men betyder blot at den peer reviewed version af artiklen arkiveres i institutionens lokale repositorium. 
Green Open Access is not a change of peer review, as it takes place today, it merely means that the peerreviewed version of an article is archived in the institution's repository.
Overordnet set kan man opdele versionerne i tre grupper: the submitted work (ikke peer reviewed), the accepted work (peer reviewed) og the published work (peer reviewed og layoutet/publisher version). 
In general, the versions can be divided into three groups: the submitted work (not peer-reviewed), the accepted work (peerreviewed) and the published work (peer-reviewed and layouted/publisher version).
Men Open Access Udvalget understreger, at man ikke opfatter Open Access som et problem for den videnskabelige kvalitetssikring, og at repositorier er et supplement til videnskabelige tidsskrifter - ikke en erstatning. 
However, the Open Access Committee stresses that Open Access is not considered a problem in relation to scientific quality assurance, and that repositories are a supplement to scientific journals - not a replacement.
En ny undersøgelse konkluderer, at fordelen ved at publicere Open Access er statistisk signifikant: “The OA advantage is greater for the more citable articles, not because of a quality bias from authors self-selecting what to make OA, but because of a quality advantage, from users self-selecting what to use and cite, freed by OA from the constraints of selective accessibility to subscribers only.” 
A new survey concludes that the advantage gained from publishing Open Access is statistically significant: “The OA advantage is greater for the more citable articles, not because of a quality bias from authors self-selecting what to make OA, but because of a quality advantage, from users self-selecting what to use and cite, freed by OA from the constraints of selective accessibility to subscribers only.
Open Access udvalget har udbedt sig oplysninger fra Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen med det formål at belyse muligheden for grøn Open Access til danskproducerede videnskabelige/peer reviewed artikler på nuværende tidspunkt. 
The Open Access Committee has requested information from the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation with a view to elucidating the possibility of green Open Access to Danish produced scientific /peer-reviewed articles at the present time.
Dette betyder, at man via de fire farvekoder, som anvendes i Sherpa/Romeo, kan se, hvor mange af tidsskrifterne og artiklerne i den bibliometriske forskningsindikator, som understøtter grøn Open Access 
This means that by means of the four colour codes used in Sherpa/Romeo it is possible to see how many of the journals and articles in the bibliometric research indicator support green Open Access.
Grøn Open Access af peer reviewed artikler understøttes i de tidsskrifter, som Sherpa/Romeo klassificerer som “green” (788 tidsskrifter) og “blue” (880 tidsskrifter). 
Green Open Access to peer-reviewed articles is supported by the journals that Sherpa/Romeo classifies as ‘green' (788 journals) and ‘blue' (880 journals).
Når man ser på artiklerne i de 3000 tidsskrifter, så er der 2548 artikler i kategorien “green” og 2839 artikler i kategorien “blue”, dvs. samlet set 5387 artikler. 
If you look at the articles in the 3,000 journals, there are 2,548 articles in the ‘green' category and 2,839 articles in the ‘blue' category, i.e. a total of 5,387 articles.
Set i forhold til det samlede antal artikler som har opnået point i 2010, betyder dette, at 42 % af artiklerne i den bibliometriske forskningsindikator kunne gøres frit tilgængelige via grøn Open Access. 
Seen in relation to the total number of articles that have achieved points in 2010, this means that 42 % of the articles in the bibliometric research indicator could be made freely available via green Open Access.
1) At styrke de nationale strategier og strukturer for adgang til og formidling af videnskabelig information 2) At styrke koordinationen mellem medlemsstaterne af politikker og praksis med hensyn til adgang og formidling 3) At sikre langtidsbevaring af videnskabelig information, herunder publikationer og data, samt vise den videnskabelige information i nationale bevaringsstrategier behørig opmærksomhed. 
1) Reinforce national strategies and structures for access to and dissemination of scientific information 2) Enhance coordination between the Member States on access and dissemination policies and practicies 3) Ensure long-term preservation of scientific information, including publications and data, and pay due attention to scientific information in national preservation strategies.
Den bibliometriske forskningsindikator har til formål at fremme publicering i de mest anerkendte udgivelseskanaler og styrke kvaliteten af dansk forskning 
The purpose of the bibliometric research indicator is to further publishing via the most distinguished publishing channels and
. Spørgsmålet er, om der er områder, hvor man med fordel 
strengthen the quality of Danish research.
Videnskabsministeriet forestår den nødvendige høring og beslutning 3. 
The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation handles the necessary hearing and subsequent decision 3.
Implementering af national Open Access-politik. 
Implementation of a national Open Access policy.
1. Etablering af Open Access-politik 2. 
1. Establishment of Open Access policy 2.
Implementering af Open Access-politik. 
Implementation of Open Access policy.
samt rådgivning af forskerne. 
procedures as well as advice to the researchers.
1. Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen og Danmarks Elektroniske Fag- og Forskningsbibliotek (DEFF) undersøger mulighederne for samspil mellem den bibliometriske forskningsindikator og Open Access. 
1. The Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation and Denmark's Electronic Research Library (DEFF) investigate the possibilities of achieving interaction between the bibliometric research indicator and Open Access.
Dette kræver en videreudvikling af Den Danske Forskningsdatabase og en styrket formidlingsindsats. 
This requires further development of the Danish Research Database and a strengthened dissemination initiative.
I takt med at universiteterne i højere grad begynder at lagre forskningspublikationernes fulde tekst i de lokale repositorier, øges behovet for, at universiteterne og andre kan trække på langtidsbevaringstjenester. 
As the universities to a higher degree begin to store the full text of research publications in local repositories, the need increases for the universities and others to be able to draw on long-term preservation services.
Dette er baggrunden for anbefaling nummer seks: Undersøgelse af behovet for ét repositorium til små forskningsinstitutioners forskningspublikationer. 
This is the basis for recommendation number six: Survey of the need for one repository for small research institutions' research publications.
1. Videnskabsministeriet og Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen implementerer de nødvendige krav i forskningsbevillinger 
1. The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation and the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation implement the necessary requirements in research grants
Anbefaling 6 Undersøgelse af behovet for ét repositorium til små forskningsinstitutioners forskningspublikationer 
Recommendation 6 Survey of the need for one repository for small research institutions' research publications
1. Der udarbejdes en undersøgelse inklusive økonomi og mulige scenarier 2. 
1. A survey is prepared including finances and possible scenarios 2.
Anbefaling 7 Danske videnskabelige forlag, videnskabelige selskaber og videnskabsredaktører udarbejder oplæg om omstilling til Open Access for videnskabelige tidsskrifter 
Recommendation 7 Danish scientific publishers, scientific associations and science editors prepare discussion paper on scientific journals' transition to Open Access
1. Open Access Udvalget udarbejder kommissorium 2. 
1. The Open Access Committee prepares mandate 2.
Forlæggerforeningen, videnskabelige selskaber og videnskabsredaktører inviteres til at komme med udspil for tidsskrifter på baggrund af kommissorium 3. 
The Danish Publishers Association, scientific associations and science editors are invited to submit proposals for journals based on the mandate 3.
Forlæggerforeningen, videnskabelige selskaber og videnskabsredaktører udarbejder forslag til, hvordan danske videnskabelige tidsskrifter kan omstilles til Open Access. 
The Danish Publishers Association, scientific associations and science editors prepare proposals on how Danish scientific journals can make the transition to Open Access.
1. Der afsættes en ramme på 500.000 kr., som kan anvendes til undersøgelser og konsulentbistand. 
1. A framework amount of DKK 500,000 is allocated for surveys and consultant assistance.
Denne rådgivning bør tænkes ind i den lokale implementering af universiteternes Open Accesspolitikker. 
This guidance should be incorporated into the local implementation of the universities' Open Access policies.
Implementeringen skal ske under hensyntagen til universiteter, andre forskningsproducerende institutioner, forskningsråd og forlæggere. 
The implementation should take place with due consideration for universities, other research procuding institutions, research councils and publishers.
Anbefaling 9 Open Access Udvalget overvåger implementeringen af videnskabsministerens Open Access-strategi 
Recommendation 9 The Open Access Committee monitors the implementation of the Minister of Science's Open Access strategy
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at udvalget sekretariatsbetjenes af DEFF og overvåger og koordinerer implementeringen af videnskabsministerens Open Accessstrategi i en projektperiode på fire år. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that the Committee be given secretariat assistance from DEFF andmonitor and coordinate the implementation of the Minister of Science's Open Access strategy for a project period of four years.
1. Open Access Udvalget bliver ansvarligt for implementeringen af videnskabsministerens Open Access-strategi 2. 
1. The Open Access Committee becomes responsible for the implementation of the Minister of Science's Open Access strategy 2.
DEFF udarbejder en samlet projektplan, som godkendes af Open Access Udvalget. 
DEFF prepares an overall project plan, which is approved by the Open Access Committee.
Projektplanen omfatter de samlede anbefalinger samt plan for oprettelse af de nationale støttefunktioner 3. 
The project plan includes the combined recommendations and a plan for the establishment of national support functions 3.
Implementering af projektplanen. 
Implementation of the project plan.
Anbefaling10 Styrke og understøtte information, debat og dialog Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i forbindelse med koordinering af implementeringen af Open Access Udvalgets anbefalinger gennemføres en informationskampagne med debat og dialog omkring Open Access målrettet forskermiljøer i form af f.eks. informationsmateriale og konferencer. 
Recommendation 10 Strengthening and supporting information, debate and dialogue The Open Access Committee recommends that in connection with the coordination of the implementation of the Open Access Committee's recommendations an information campaign be carried out with debate and dialogue about Open Access, targeted at research environments in the form of e.g. information material and conferences.
1. Open Access Udvalget udarbejder plan for gennemførelsen af information, debat 
1. The Open Access Committee prepares a plan for information, debate and
Anbefaling 11 Koordinering af den danske Open Access-indsats i internationale fora udføres 
Recommendation 11 Coordination of the Danish Open Access initiative in international forums
Dette er sket i Nederlandene, hvor man på nationalt plan har indgået en aftale med Springer om fri adgang til alle forskningspublikationer publiceret af hollandske universitetsforskere hos Springer i 2010. 
This has happened in the Netherlands where an agreement at national level has been made with Springer about Open Access to all research publications published on behalf of Dutch university researchers by Springer in 2010.
Anbefaling 12 Øget fokus på Open Access i DEFF konsortielicenser Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i DEFFs licensarbejde og i de internationale samarbejder, hvori DEFF indgår, sættes fokus på forhandling af forfatterafgifter ifm. gylden Open Access, frihed til grøn Open Access og transparente forretningsmodeller for Open Access-publicering mod betaling. 
Recommendation 12 Increased focus on Open Access in DEFF consortium licenses The Open Access Committee recommends that in DEFF's work with licences and in the international partnerships in which DEFF takes part, focus be directed at negotiation of writers' royalties in connection with golden Open Access, freedom to green Open Access and transparent business models for Open Access publishing at a fee.
Anbefaling 13 Dansk medlemskab af centrale samarbejdsfora for repositorier og interoperabilitet 
Recommendation 13 Danish membership of central collaboration forums for repositories and interoperability
Årligt medlemskab: 50.000 kr. 
Annual membership: DKK 50,000.
Der eksperimenteres i internationalt regi med forskellige alternative publiceringsmodeller, og eventuelle danske erfaringer bør udbredes og afrapporteres til EU-Kommissionen 
Various alternative publishing models are being tested internationally, and any Danish experience should be disseminated and reported on to the EU Commission.
I Danmark sikrer Lov om Pligtaflevering af offentliggjort materiale langtidsbevaring på publikationsområdet, men når det handler om forskningsdata, er situationen en anden. 
In Denmark, the Act on Legal Deposit of Published Material ensures long-term preservation of publications, but when it comes to research data, the situation is quite different.
Som nævnt ovenfor under opgave 1.2 vokser universiteternes behov for at kunne trække på langtidsbevaringstjenester i takt med, at de i stadig højere grad lagrer forskningspublikationernes fulde tekst i deres lokale repositorier. 
As mentioned above under Assignment 1.2, the universities increasingly need to be able to draw on long-term preservation services as they increasingly store the full text of research publications in their local repositories.