natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
UVVU havde taget stilling til tre konkrete klagepunkter vedrørende hans forskning, som var indeholdt i personalesagen. 
The DCSD had decided on three actual points of complaint relating to his research which were included in the staff case.
UVVU tog ikke stilling til personalesagen, da UVVU ikke har kompetence til at behandle sådanne sager og heller ikke fungerer som klageinstans for klager i personalesager. 
The DCSD did not decide on the staff case as the DCSD has no jurisdiction to process such cases and does not serve as complaint instance for complaints in staff cases.
Det fremgik af den nye henvendelse, at klageren ønskede at klage over A og B dels for uacceptabel overfladiskhed og faglig uduelighed i forbindelse med den faglige indrapportering på institutionen og dels for en dertil relateret offentlig misinformation. 
It appeared from the new inquiry that the complainant wanted to complain about A and B partly for unacceptable superficiality and scientific incompetence in connection with the scientific reporting at the institution and partly for related public misinformation.
I relation til A anførte klager endvidere, at A offentligt havde antydet, at klageren sympatiserede med nogle nærmere angivne ekstreme grupper. 
In relation to A, the complainant also indicated that A had publicly suggested that the complainant sympathised with some more closely defined extreme groups.
Endvidere var det klagers opfattelse, at A i en redegørelse til en leder på institutionen i forbindelse med personalesagen havde udvist groft uagtsom adfærd, der indebar utilbørlig vildledning om andres videnskabelige indsats, og at redegørelsen var utroværdig og værdiløs. 
Furthermore, according to the complainant, in a statement to a manager of the institution in connection with the staff case, A had acted in a grossly negligent manner which implied improper misguidance about the scientific efforts of others and the statement was unreliable and worthless.
Klager anså det endvidere for en skærpende omstændighed, at A angiveligt havde gjort sig bekendt med klagers fortrolige projektprotokol. 
Furthermore, the complainant believed that, by public press statements, A did not meet the requirements of due care, objectivity and quality you would generally expect of a scientific report.
I relation til B fremførte klager, at B havde misinformeret og udvist videnskabelig uredelighed i forbindelse med offentlige udtalelser om brugen af forskningsmateriale fra et forskningsprojekt. 
In relation to B, the complainant stated that B had misinformed and displayed scientific dishonesty in connection with public statements about the use of research materials from a research project.
Klager anførte blandt andet, at det var hans opfattelse, at B (til dels sammen med A) havde handlet videnskabeligt uredeligt ved utilbørligt at have vildledt offentligheden om klagers forskningsprojekt blandt andet i en kronik og en artikel i dagspressen. 
The complainant indicated, among other things, that according to him, B (partly in company with A) had acted scientifically dishonest by improperly having misguided the general public about the complainant s research project, among other places, in a feature article and in an article in the daily press.
Det var endvidere klagers påstand, at B havde udvist alvorlige svigt i sit virke ved institutionen ved ikke at opfylde de krav til omhu og kvalitet, som man i almindelighed kan forvente af en videnskabelig rapport, og at B havde givet utilbørlig vildledning til institutionens leder, UVVU og offentligheden. 
Furthermore, the complainant claimed that B had displayed serious neglect in his position at the institution by not meeting the requirements of due care and quality which you would generally expect from a scientific report, and that B had given improper misguidance to the manager of the institution, the DCSD and the general public.
I forbindelse med klagen over C henviste klager til, at C gennem mange år systematisk og groft havde misinformeret om klagers forskning samt fordrejet og mistænkeliggjort hans internationale kollegaers faglige virke og faglige fora via hjemmesider med referencer til institutionen. 
In connection with the complaint about C, the complainant referred to the fact that, for many years, C had systematically and grossly misinformed about the complainant s research as well as having distorted and thrown suspicion on his international colleagues' professional activities and professional fora via websites with references to the institution.
Det var endvidere klagers opfattelse, at C gjorde sig skyldig i strafbare injurier. 
Furthermore, the complainant believed that C was guilty of punishable slander.
Da UVVU ikke er klageinstans for hverken personalesagen eller institutionen, hvor klager var ansat, kan UVVU ikke tage stilling til den rapport, som et udvalg på institutionen havde udarbejdet, og som dannede grundlag for en indberetning fra en afdelingsleder til lederen af institutionen. 
Since the DCSD is not a complaint instance for neither the staff case nor the institution where the complainant was employed, the DCSD is unable to decide on the report which a committee in the institution had prepared and which formed the basis of a reporting from a head of department to the manager of the institution.
Klagen over A henviste endvidere til presseudtalelser, der blev fremsat i forbindelse med personalesagen, og klagen over B henviste til en kronik og en artikel i dagspressen. 
The complaint about A furthermore referred to press statements made in connection with the staff case, and the complaint about B referred to a feature article in the daily press.
Da presseudtalelserne og de omhandlede indlæg i dagspressen ikke kan betragtes som videnskabelige produkter, kunne UVVU ikke behandle sagen, jf. § 1 i bekendtgørelsen om UVVU. 
As the press statements and the involved contributions in the daily press cannot be considered scientific products, the DCSD was unable to process the case, cf. section 1 of the executive order on the DCSD.
Klagen over C henviste til indlæg og artikler på hjemmesider og i andre populærmedier, der omhandlede klagers forskning. 
The complaint about C referred to contributions and articles at websites and in other popular media concerning the complainant's research.
Da der ikke var tale om videnskabelige produkter, kunne UVVU ikke behandle klagen. 
As these were not scientific products, the DCSD was unable to process the complaint.
Det var endvidere klagers påstand, at C gjorde sig skyldig i strafbare injurier, hvilket UVVU ikke har kompetence til at behandle. 
The complainant furthermore claimed that C was guilty of punishable slander which the DCSD has no jurisdiction to process.
Klageren indbragte sagen på vegne af to navngivne kunstnere. 
The complainant brought the case on behalf of two named artists.
Klager klagede over, at indklagede og museet havde behandlet de to kunstnere uetisk og uredeligt i en universitetssammenhæng i forbindelse med afviklingen af det angivne projekt, blandt andet fordi de to kunstnere ikke var nævnt i en invitation til udstillingen. 
The complainant complained about the defendant and the museum having treated the two artists in an unethical and dishonest manner in university relations in connection with the said project, among other things, because the two artists had not been mentioned in an invitation to the exhibition.
Klager anførte, at den ene kunstner ikke var blevet nævnt i en radioudsendelse om udstillingen, som indklagede havde deltaget i. 
The complainant indicated that one artist had not been mentioned in a radio show about the exhibition which the defendant had participated in.
Endvidere anførte klager, at den ene kunstner, som havde udlånt et antal kunstværker, ikke var nævnt, hvorimod to andre kunstnere, repræsenteret med hver et kunstværk, begge blev takket for udlån. 
Furthermore, the complainant stated that one of the artists, who had lent a number of works of art, had not been mentioned whereas two other artists each represented by one work of art had both been thanked for the loan.
Endelig anførte klager, at der havde været samarbejdsproblemer mellem de to kunstnere og indklagede i forbindelse med blandt andet ferniseringen af udstillingen, foruden at den ene kunstner og dennes projektoplæg ikke var nævnt i referencer til udstillingen. 
Finally, the complainant indicated that there had been difficulty in cooperation between the two artists and the defendant in connection, among others, with the private view of the exhibition, besides from one of the artists and his project presentation not having been mentioned in references to the exhibition.
Klagen over indklagede og museet rettede sig mod udstillingen og en bog, der blev udgivet i forbindelse med projektet. 
The complaint about the defendant and the museum addressed the exhibition and a book published in connection with the project.
Det tilsvarende gjorde sig gældende i relation til omtalen i henholdsvis invitationen og radioudsendelsen. 
Correspondingly applies in relation to the mentioning in the invitation and the radio show, respectively.
ERASynBio åbner nu for ansøgninger til opslaget med titlen: "ERASynBio 2nd joint call for transnational research projects - Building Synthetic Biology capacity through innovative transnational projects". 
ERA-SynBio now opens for applications to the call entitled: “ERASynBio 2nd joint call for transnational research projects - Building Synthetic Biology capacity through innovative transnational projects”.
Opslaget vil støtte forskningsområder inden for syntesebiologi. 
The joint call will support research areas within Synthetic Biology.
For mere information herom refereres til opslagsteksten (se link nedenfor). 
For more information please see the call text documents (see link below).
Opslag af midler til forskning om kvalitet i videregående uddannelser 
Funding for research in higher education quality - Call
Ansøgningsfrist mandag den 23. oktober 2017 
Applications must be submitted by Monday 23 October 2017
Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet udmønter i 2017-2020 en særbevilling på i alt op til 10 mio. kroner. 
The Ministry of Higher Education and Science is in 2017-2020 offering a special grant of in total up to 10 million Danish kroner.
Midlerne udbydes til at gennemføre forskning, der kan give bedre indsigt i måling og fremme af kvalitet i videregående uddannelser. 
The funding is for research activities which are to provide better insight into monitoring and promotion of quality in higher education.
Der er over de senere år taget en række initiativer, der sigter imod at fremme kvalitet og relevans i de videregående uddannelser. 
During recent years, a number of initiatives have been taken with the scope to promote quality and relevance in higher education.
Dansk og international uddannelsesforskning har i vid udstrækning beskæftiget sig med, hvad der befordrer god undervisning og dybdelæring. 
Meanwhile, less attention has been given to build research-based knowledge on the monitoring of educational quality and the effects of quality developing initiatives.
Der er behov for forskning i effekten af forskellige pædagogiske og didaktiske tilgange, metoder og værktøjer med henblik på at understøtte tiltag til at styrke undervisningskvalitet, motivation og læring. 
Research is needed into the effects of various pedagogical and didactic approaches, methods and instruments with a view to support initiatives aimed at strengthening the quality of teaching, motivation and learning.
Herunder er der behov for, at forskningsindsatsen bidrager til at opbygge viden om, hvilke tiltag og indsatser, der virker bedst. 
This includes a need for educational research to create knowledge on what works best with regard to improving quality in higher education.
Sådant samarbejde kan omfatte flere parter, herunder samarbejde med professionshøjskoler og erhvervsakademier. 
Such collaboration could involve multiple parties, including co-operation with university colleges and business academies.
Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet giver under dette opslag tilskud til 1-2 forskningsprojekter af op til 3 års varighed og med et samlet budget på minimum 5 mio. kr. 
In this call, the Ministry of Higher Education and Science awards 1-2 research projects with a duration of up to 3 years and a total budget of minimum 5 million Danish kroner (including overhead and potential co-financing from the participating parties).
(inkl. overhead og eventuel medfinansiering fra deltagerne). 
The funding is offered as a framework grant.
Styrelsen for Forskning og Uddannelse forventer at give tilsagn om bevilling efter dette opslag inden udgangen af december 2017. 
The Danish Agency for Science and Higher Education expects to give approval for funding regarding this call before the end of December 2017.
Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriets 'Vilkår for bevillinger' gælder for alle bevillingers udbetaling, anvendelse og administration. 
The Ministry of Higher Education and Science's “Terms and Conditions for Grants” apply to the payments, application and management of all grants.
I det omfang opslagets bestemmelser afviger fra bestemmelserne i 'Vilkår for bevillinger', har opslaget forrang. 
The conditions in the call prevail as far as these deviate from the conditions in the “Terms and Conditions for Grants”.
Ansøger skal være ansat på en institution omfattet af lov om universiteter (LBK nr. 261 af 18. marts 2015), og skal som minimum have opnået ph.d.-graden eller tilsvarende kvalifikationer og have den fornødne forskningserfaring til at sikre projektets gennemførelse. 
The applicant must be employed at an institution subject to the University Act (LBK nr 261 of 18 March 2015), have obtained, as a minimum, a PhD or achieved equivalent qualifications and have the necessary research experience to ensure the completion of the project.
Se nærmere om vurdering af projektdeltagernes kvalifikationer under afsnit 5.1. 
Please refer to section 5.1 for further information about the evaluation of participants' qualifications.
Ansøgningen med bilag skal være modtaget i Styrelsen for Forskning og Uddannelse senest mandag den 23. oktober 2017. 
The application with appendices must be received by the Danish Agency for Science and Higher Education no later than Monday 23 October 2017.
Ansøgninger skal indsendes til følgende emailadresse: uddannelsesforskning@ufm.dk 
The applications must be submitted via the following e-mail address: uddannelsesforskning@ufm.dk
• En udfyldt ansøgningsblanket 
• A filled-in application form
• En projektbeskrivelse inkl. tidsplan og formidlingsplan 
• A project description including schedule and communication plan
• CV på projektets deltagere 
• CVs of the project participants
• Publikationslister for projektets deltagere 
• List of publications for the project participants
• Eksamensbevis for eventuelle ph.d.-studerende 
• Diplomas for participating PhD students, if any
• Et specificeret budget, og 
• A specified budget
• Bekræftelse af budget og tilsagn fra værtsinstitution 
• The employing institution's confirmation of the budget and acknowledge
Af hensyn til eventuel ekstern bedømmelse, jf. afsnit 5.1, skal projektbeskrivelse og CV skrives på engelsk. 
Due to possible external review cf. section 5.1, the project description and CVs must be written in English.
Det er ansøgers ansvar, at ansøgningen indeholder alle relevante oplysninger. 
It is the applicant's responsibility that the application contains all relevant information.
Projektbeskrivelsen må højest være på 5 A4-sider ekskl. referencer og budget. 
The length of the project description must not exceed 5 A4 pages excl. the list of the references and the budget.
Kravene vedrørende fontstørrelse gælder også for eventuelle fodnoter, tabeller, figurtekster og lignende. 
The requirements regarding font size do also apply to any footnotes, figures/ tables, text on figures/ tables etc.
Projektbeskrivelsen skal indeholde en klar og afgrænset problemformulering og målsætning, og en redegørelse for det teoretiske og/eller metodiske grundlag, herunder en argumentation for, at de foreslåede aktiviteter er relevante i forhold til dette grundlag. 
The project description must contain a clear and well-defined problem statement and objective and an account of the theoretical and/ or methodological foundation, including a reasoning for the relevance of the proposed activities in relation to this theoretical/ methodological basis.
Budgettet skal dække hele projektperioden og vise, hvad der søges om tilskud til, herunder aktiviteter på ansøgers egen institution, og aktiviteter, der udføres af eventuelle andre deltagere. 
The budget must cover the entire project period and describe the activities to be funded, including activities at the applicant's own institution and activities carried out by potential other participants.
5. Behandling af ansøgninger Ansøgninger behandles efter proceduren beskrevet i afsnit 5.1. 
5. Processing of applications The applications are processed according to the procedures described in section 5.1.
Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond (DFF) foretager på vegne af Styrelsen for Forskning og Uddannelse en forskningsfaglig vurdering af ansøgningerne efter vurderingskriterierne i afsnit 5.2. 
On behalf of the Danish Agency for Science and Higher Education, the Independent Research Fund Denmark carries out a scientific assessment according to the assessment criteria in section 5.2.
På grund af konkurrencen mellem ansøgninger er det ikke givet, at en opfyldelse af vurderingskriterierne i sig selv fører til bevilling. 
Because of the competition between the applications, it is not certain that a fulfillment of the assessment criteria will lead to a grant awarding.
På baggrund af DFF's prioritering af de støtteværdige ansøgninger vil Styrelsen for Forskning og Uddannelse træffe afgørelse om tildeling af bevilling. 
On the basis of the Independent Research Fund Denmark's prioritisation of applications meriting support, the Danish Agency for Science and Higher Education will reach a decision for grant awarding.
• Ansøgningen sendes til forskningsfaglig bedømmelse hos DFF 
• The assessment by the Independent Research Fund Denmark is sent to the
• Ansøgeren partshøres efter forvaltningslovens regler over bedømmelsen fra DFF 
applicant for consultation according to administrative law
• Styrelsen for Forskning og Uddannelse træffer beslutning om tildeling 
• The Danish Agency for Science and Higher Education reaches a decision for
• Der vil blive lagt vægt på, om ansøgningen indeholder en strategi for organisering og ledelse af projektet, herunder en redegørelse for arbejdsdelingen mellem de involverede forskere i projektet. 
• Emphasis will be put on the degree to which the application contains a strategy for the organisation and management of the project, including an account of the distribution of work between the involved researchers
5.2.3 Efterlevelse af formål 
5.2.3 Compliance with objective
• Der vil blive lagt vægt på, i hvor høj grad projektet er egnet til at opfylde formålet som beskrevet i afsnit 1, og om der er redegjort tilstrækkeligt herfor i ansøgningen. 
• Emphasis will be put on the degree to which the project is suited to fulfil the scope as described in section 1, and if this is adequately described in the application.
• Der vil blive lagt vægt på, om der er allokeret tilstrækkelige ressourcer til projektet, herunder faglige rammer, personale og adgang til nødvendige faciliteter og udstyr, og om der er fremlagt en realistisk arbejds- og tidsplan for projektet. 
• Emphasis will be put on the degree to which sufficient resources have been allocated to the project, including scientific resources, staffing and access to the necessary facilities and equipment, and if a realistic work schedule and timetable for the project has been presented.
I denne vurdering indgår o projektbeskrivelsens redegørelse for projektets milepæle og succeskriterier, herunder om disse er realistiske, o om der er proportionalitet mellem projektets omkostninger og det forventede videnskabelige udbytte, og o om der er proportionalitet mellem de foreslåede aktiviteter og det foreslåede budget o om der er komplementaritet mellem de deltagende faglige miljøer 
This assessment includes the following: o The project description's account for project milestones and success criteria, and whether they are realistic o Are the project's expenses commensurate with the anticipated scientific results o Are the proposed activities commensurate with the proposed budget
5.2.5 Publicering og formidling af resultater 
5.2.5 Publication and dissemination of results
• Der vil blive lagt vægt på, om de samlede overvejelser om formidling, herunder publicering af projektets resultater, er beskrevet tilfredsstillende, herunder at der er en klar og realistisk formidlingsplan. 
• Emphasis will be put on the degree to which the application provides an adequate account of the overall considerations with regard to the publication and dissemination of research results.
I den forbindelse vil det blive vægtet positivt, at projektets resultater ud over videnskabelig publicering også formidles (på dansk) i en let tilgængelig form målrettet beslutningstagere, myndigheder og ledelserne på de videregående uddannelsesinstitutioner, herunder ved arrangementer, udgivelser og lign. undervejs i projektperioden. 
In this context, there will be attached importance to the research results being communicated and presented in, in addition to scientific publications, an easily accessible form (in Danish) targeted policy makers, authorities and management at higher education institutions, including events, publications etc. during the project period.
Danske forskere og virksomheder har succes med at få støtte fra EU til forsknings- og innovationsprojekter. 
Danish researchers and companies have been successful in securing EU funding for research and innovation projects.
Siden 2014 har 825 projekter med dansk deltagelse modtaget et boost på næsten 3,7 milliarder kroner og 2,52 procent af de konkurrenceudsatte midler i Horizon 2020. 
Since 2014, 825 projects with Danish participants were boosted by almost DKK 3.7 billion or 2.52 per cent of competitive funds from Horizon 2020.
Inden for informations- og kommunikationsteknologi er der siden marts 2016 bevilget 160 millioner kroner til danske forskere og virksomheder. 
Since March 2016, the area of information and communication technology (ICT) has seen DKK 160 million granted in funding to Danish researchers and companies.
Midlerne går blandt andet til projekter, der kan hjælpe børn med autisme eller forbedre små og mellemstore virksomheders konkurrenceevne gennem øget automatisering. 
Projects funded include ones that can help children with autism, and ones that can improve SMEs competitiveness through increased automation.
Det samlede hjemtag inden for dette område er 364 millioner kroner. 
The ICT area has attracted a total of DKK 364 million in funding.
Uddannelses- og forskningsminister Søren Pind er meget tilfreds med de høje tal: 
Minister for Higher Education and Science Søren Pind is very pleased with the results:
- De mange millioner, som Danmark har hentet hjem fra EU, er ikke kun et vigtigt boost for danske forskere og virksomheder. 
- The many millions that Denmark has secured in funding from the EU are not only an important boost for Danish researchers and companies.
Det er også vigtigt for væksten i hele landet. 
It is also important for growth across the whole country.
1,25 milliarder til de bedste ideer 
DKK 1.25 billion for the best ideas
Danmark klarer sig også godt, når det kommer til at hente støtte til excellente projekter, der tager udgangspunkt i forskernes og virksomhedernes egne idéer. 
Denmark performs very well when it comes to securing support for projects borne from researchers and companies own ideas.
Det er især i Marie Sklodowska-Curie-programmet, hvor der gives støtte til forskermobilitet og karriereudvikling, at Danmark præsterer godt. 
The Marie Sklodowska-Curie programme in particular provides good support for Danish researcher mobility and career development.