natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nedenstående beregningsprincipper, der gælder for USA, vil kunne gennemføres for andre lande, forudsat naturligvis at grunddata forligger. 
The calculation principles below for the US can be applied for other countries provided basic data is available.
USA er sammen med Kina de to suverænt største producenter, begge med ca. 16% af verdensproduktionen i 1991/92 (TAS, 1992). 
China and the US are, by far, the two largest producers, with approx. 16 per cent each of world production in 1991/92 (TAS, 1992).
I 1995/96 var fordelingen henholdsvis 20% og 23% (Melliand, 1996). 
In 1995/96, the distribution was 20 per cent and 23 per cent respectively (Melliand, 1996).
Forbrug af gødning 
Consumption of fertilizer
Eller pr. kg pakket råbomuld henholdsvis: 0,14 kg N, 0,08 kg P2O5 og 0,08 kg K2O. 
Or per kg packed raw cotton: 0.14 kg N, 0.08 kg P2O5 and 0.08 kg K2O.
Forbrug af andre kemikalier 
Consumption of other chemicals
Når det gælder andre kemikalier som insekticider, er der et utal af forskellige midler mod et utal af forskellige insekter. 
As for other chemicals, such as insecticides, there are countless different agents against countless insect species.
Tilsvarende gælder for herbicider mod ukrudt og midler mod diverse potentielle skader som svamp. 
The same applies to herbicides against weed and agents against various types of potential damage like fungus.
I tabel 8.1 er angivet nogle eksempler - og de var i 1997/98 alle meget udbredte i USA (USDA, 1999). 
Table 8.1 shows some examples, and in 1997/98, they were all very common in the US (USDA, 1999).
I tabellen er endvidere angivet doseringen per kemikalie (aktivt stof). 
The table also states the dose per chemical (active substance).
I mængden, der er angivet, er taget højde for, at stoffet kan tilsætte ad flere omgange. 
The volume indicated takes into account that the substance may be added in several operations.
Doseringen er også omregnet til ”per kg pakket råbomuld (gram per kg). 
The dose has been converted to "per kg packed raw cotton" (g per kg).
Til omregningen er det gennemsnitlige høstudbytte i USA fra 1992/93 anvendt, dvs. ca. 785 kg pakket råbomuld per hektar. 
The average crop yield in the US in 1992/93 has been used for the conversion, i.e. approx. 785 kg packed raw cotton per hectare.
Tabel 8.1 Forbrug af kemikalier - bomuldsdyrkning 
Table 8.1 Consumption of chemicals - cotton cultivation
Dosering af kemikalier er vanskelig at overskue. 
It is difficult to assess the dosage of chemicals.
Fokuserer man på doseringen af det enkelte kemikalie, er ovenstående mængde korrekte. 
If focus is on the dose of the individual chemical, the above volumes are correct.
Men da bomuld kan blive angrebet af mange forskelle insekter og blive hæmmet af mange forskellige ukrudtstyper, vil der typisk skulle anvendes flere forskellige kemikalier. 
But as cotton may be attacked by many different kinds of insect and inhibited by many different types of weed, several types of chemical will typically be used.
Dette betyder, at den samlede dosering af især insekticider og herbicider er betydeligt højere end doseringen for et enkelt stof. 
This means that the total dose of particularly insecticides and herbicides is much higher that the dose for an individual substance.
I følge Coupe et al (1998) anvendes insekticider og herbicider i op til henholdsvis ca. 5 kg/ha og 7 kg/ha. 
According to Coupe et al. (1998), insecticides and herbicides are used up to approx. 5 kg/ha and 7 kg/ha.
I UMIPTEX er der valgt at anvende følgende stoffer og mængder i beregningerne: 
For EDIPTEX, it has been decided to apply the following substances and volumes in the calculations:
Insekticid: 6 gram Esfenvalerate per kg bomuld 
Insecticide: 6 g Esfenvalerate per kg cotton
Herbicid: 9 gram Trifluralin per kg bomuld 
Herbicide: 9 g Trifluralin per kg cotton
Fungicid: 1 gram Captan per kg bomuld 
Fungicide: 1 g Captan per kg cotton
Vækstfremmer: 1,5 gram Etephon per kg bomuld 
Growth enhancer: 1.5 g Ethephon per kg cotton
Afløvningsmiddel: 0,5 gram Paraquat per kg bomuld. 
Defoliation agent: 0.5 g Paraquat per kg cotton.
Der skal således fremstilles i alt 18 gram ”pesticider” per kg bomuld. 
Thus, production of 18 g "pesticides" is required per kg cotton.
Insekticidet Esfenvalerate er i følge USDA (1999) ikke blandt de mest udbredte, men anvendtes dog. 
According to USDA (1999), the insecticide Esfenvalerate was not among the most common ones, but is was used.
Insekticidet er valgt til UMIPTEX, da der ikke kunne fremskaffes tilstrækkelige data til beregning af effektfaktorer for de mest udbredte insekticider. 
This insecticide has been selected for EDIPTEX, as it was not possible to obtain enough data for calculation of equivalency factors for the most common insecticides.
Tal angivet i andre kilder f.eks. Svensson (1995) vurderes ikke at være korrekte. 
Data from other sources, such as Svensson (1995), are not deemed correct.
Van Winkle et al. (1978) angiver et energiforbrug på 49 MJ/kg pakket råbomuld.. 
Van Winkle et al. (1978) states energy consumption of 49 MJ/kg packed raw cotton.
I tallet er inkluderet elektricitet og brændsel til dyrkning, høst og egrenering. 
This figure includes electricity and fuel for cultivation, harvest and ginning.
Endvidere er energi til produktion af gødning og pesticider inkluderet i Van Winkles data. 
Moreover, energy for production of fertilizer and pesticides is included in Van Winkle's data.
For at kunne estimere energiforbruget til fremstilling af økologisk bomuld har det dog været nødvendigt at opgøre energiforbruget til fremstilling af gødning og pesticider i separate processer. 
In order to estimate the energy consumption for production of organic cotton however, it was necessary to calculate the energy consumption for production of fertilizer and pesticides in separate processes.
Van Winkle angiver sine data i ”kWh equivalents per lb lint cotton”, og kWh ekvivalenterne svarer til ”fossil fuel equivalents”, svarende til det niveau, der i UMIP-metoden betegnes ”primær energi”. 
Van Winkle states the data in ”kWh equivalents per lb lint cotton”, and the kWh equivalents correspond to ”fossil fuel equivalents”, corresponding to the level called ”primary energy” in the EDIP method.
Van Winkle angiver, at forbruget af elektricitet er ganget med 3 for at omregne til ”fossil fuel equivalents”. 
Van Winkle states that consumption of electricity has been multiplied by 3 to convert it to ”fossil fuel equivalents”.
Disse ”fossil fuel equivalents” er her omregnet for at kunne anvendes i overensstemmelse med UMIP-metoden. 
Here, these ”fossil fuel equivalents” have been converted in order for them to be applicable in accordance with the EDIP method.
For at kunne beregne de emissioner, ressourceforbrug og affaldsmængder, som fremstilling af energi medfører, har det været nødvendigt at estimere, hvor meget energi bomuldsproducenterne modtager per kg høstet bomuld - beregnet i de kWh el og kg olie, landmanden modtager. 
In order to be able to calculate the emissions, resource consumption and waste volumes resulting from generation of energy, it has been necessary to estimate how much energy cotton producers recover per kg harvested cotton - calculated as the kWh electricity and kg oil.
Van Winkles data er omregnet fra lb til kg, og elforbruget er omregnet til den modtagne mængde el ved at dividere med 3. 
Van Winkle's data have been converted from lb to kg, and electricity consumption was converted to the recovered amount of electricity by dividing by 3.
De øvrige energiforbrug er omregnet til de mængder energiressource, der anvendes. 
The remaining energy consumption has been converted to the amounts of energy resources used.
Til beregningen er følgende energiindhold anvendt 53,49 MJ per kg naturgas, 46,4 MJ per kg LP gas, 45,85 MJ per kg dieselolie og 46,89 MJ per kg benzin. 
The following energy content has been used for the calculation: 53.49 MJ per kg natural gas, 46.4 MJ per kg LP gas, 45.85 MJ per kg diesel oil and 46.89 MJ per kg petrol.
Med disse modificeringer kan Van Winkles data omregnes til følgende: Til dyrkning og høst af bomuld (uden energiforbrug til fremstilling af pesticider og gødning) anvendes: 
With these modifications, Van Winkle's data can be converted to the following: For cultivation and harvest of cotton (excluding energy consumption for production of pesticides and fertilizer) the following is used:
El: 0,91 kWh per kg høstet bomuld 
Electricity: 0.91 kWh per kg harvested cotton
Naturgas: 0,152 kg per kg høstet bomuld 
Natural gas: 0.152 kg per kg harvested cotton
LP gas: 0,027 kg per kg høstet bomuld 
LP gas: 0.027 kg per kg harvested cotton
Diesel olie: 0,235 kg per kg høstet bomuld 
Diesel oil: 0.235 kg per kg harvested cotton
Benzin: 0,108 kg per kg høstet bomuld. 
Petrol: 0.108 kg per kg harvested cotton
Energiforbruget til fremstilling af pesticider og gødning fremgår af processerne TX-K-05, TX-K-06, TX-K-07 og TX-K-08, og det bør måske bemærkes, at disse energiforbrug stemmer godt overens med det energiforbrug, Van Winkle angiver, selv om der er anvendt meget nyere referencer. 
The energy consumption for production of pesticides and fertilizer can be seen in the processes TX-K-05, TX-K-06, TX-K-07 and TX-K-08, and perhaps it should be noted that this energy consumption tallies well with the energy consumption stated by Van Winkle, although much newer references have been applied.
Angående vandforbrug er virkelighedens verden præcis lige så kompliceret som for anvendelsen af kemikalier. 
The reality of water consumption is just as complicated as that of chemicals.
I nogle egne er det slet ikke nødvendigt at kunstvande, idet det regner tilstrækkelig. 
In some regions, it is not even necessary to irrigate artificially as the region has enough rain.
Følgende beregning er foretaget: 
The following calculation has been made:
Bomuld behøver ca. 50 cm vand i en vækstsæson - enten i form af regn eller kunstvanding (Lee et al., 1984). 
Cotton needs approx. 50 cm water during one growth season - either in the form of rain or irrigation (Lee et al., 1984).
Dette giver ca. 5000 m³ per hektar. 
This is approx. 5,000 m³ per hectare.
For den del, hvor der blev anvendt kunstvanding, var der et meget varierende brug af kunstvanding. 
The use of irrigation varied a lot in the areas where irrigation was actually used.
En gennemsnitlig vægtning med mere end 30% af arealet med total kunstvanding vurderes derfor ikke at være rimelig. 
An average weighting of more than 30 per cent of the total area with total irrigation is therefore not deemed reasonable.
Dette er, hvad det vurderes, der skal bruges som minimum i USA. 
This is the assessed minimum required in the US.
Marini (1996) angiver, at det reelle vandforbrug kan komme helt op på 29 m³ pr kg pakket råbomuld i visse egne af verden. 
Marini (1996) states that the actual water consumption could reach as much as 29 m³ per kg packed raw cotton in some areas of the world.
For hvert kg bomuld, der produceres, fås ca. 2 kg bomuldsfrø. 
Approx 2 kg cotton seeds come from each kg cotton produced.
Bomuldsfrø er således ikke et egentligt affaldsprodukt, men det der i LCA-sammenhæng benævnes et ”samprodukt”. 
This means that cotton seeds do not constitute an actual waste product, but what is called a "coproduct" in lifecycle assessment terms.
Dette repræsenterer en værdi for bomuldsdyrkeren, men for bomuldsdyrkeren er der ikke tvivl om, at bomuld er hovedproduktet. 
This represents a value for the cotton cultivator, but there is no doubt for the cotton cultivator that cotton is the main product.
Den økonomiske værdi af bomuldsfrø udgør kun ca. 20% af den totale indtægt (van Winkle et al, 1978). 
The financial value of cotton seeds only represents about 20 per cent of the total revenue (Van Winkle et al., 1978).
Det er derfor valgt at tildele fiberproduktionen hele miljøbelastningen. 
We have therefore decided to allocate the entire environmental burden to the fibre production.
Mængden af affald ved egreneringen - hovedsageligt planterester - varier meget efter høstmetoden. 
The waste volumes from ginning - mainly plant residues - vary a lot according to harvesting methods.
Ved håndplukning er den meget lille, kun ca. 0. 
When the cotton is picked by hand, waste is very limited, only about 0.
03-0,32 kg/kg råbomuld. 
03-0.32 kg/kg raw cotton.
Dette giver i gennemsnit ca. 0,7 kg affald per kg råbomuld. 
This gives an average of approx. 0.7 kg waste per kg raw cotton.
Kemikalierester på bomuldsfibre 
Chemical residues on cotton fibres
Det sidste aspekt, som kræver lidt overvejelse, er den mængde af dyrkningskemikalier, der kan sidde på overfladen af råbomulden. 
The last aspect that requires some consideration is the amount of cultivation chemicals that may cling to the surface of the raw cotton.
Disse kemikalier vil i teorien (hvis de optræder i tilstrækkeligt store mængder) dels kunne give anledning til arbejdsmiljøproblemer ved håndteringen af råbomulden og dels kunne give miljøproblemer, idet de vil blive udvasket ved den senere vådbehandling i forbindelse med tekstilproduktion. 
In theory, these chemicals can (if they occur in sufficiently large amounts) cause problems for occupational health and safety during handling of the raw cotton and environmental problems because they will be washed out during the subsequent wet treatment in connection with textile production.
Der findes meget lidt litteratur om dette område. 
There is very little literature in this area.
I Henry et al (1991) er problematikken i forbindelse med brugen af afløvningsmidlet arsensyre undersøgt. 
Henry et al. (1991) studies the problematic use of the defoliation agent arsenic acid.
Arsensyre var tidligere det mest udbredte afløvningsmiddel. 
Arsenic acid used to be the most common defoliation agent.
Her blev der i 14 partier råbomuld fundet i gennemsnit ca. 100 ppm med niveauer fra ca. 1 til 325 ppm, men væsentligt større mængder i det vegetabilske affald. 
In 14 batches of raw cotton, an average of approx. 100 ppm was found with levels ranging from approx. 1 to 325 ppm, but there was significantly more in vegetable waste.
I undersøgelsen blev også påvist, at efter vask i forbindelse med forbehandling er arsensyren ikke mere sporbar i fibrene. 
The study also showed that the arsenic acid is no longer traceable in the fibres after the cotton is washed during pre-treatment.
Hvilke pesticider findes så i råbomuld og i hvor store mængder? 
Which pesticides are found in raw cotton, and how much?
Ud fra devisen om at pesticiderne skal sætte sig på fibrene, er det ikke realistisk, at pesticider, brugt tidligt i bomuldsplantens vækstfaser, hvor der slet ikke er dannet fibre endnu, eller hvor eventuelle fibre sidder beskyttet inde i frøkapslerne vil kunne findes i sporbare mængder på fibre. 
If we assume that the pesticides cling to the fibres, it is not realistic to find traceable amounts of pesticides used in early growth phases of the cotton plant when no fibres have yet been formed or when fibres are protected inside the seed pods.
Det må derfor være rimelige at antage, at der kun kan findes spor af afløvningsmidler og ikke andre. 
It should therefore be reasonable to assume that there will only be traces of defoliation agents and no other agents.
Brugen af arsensyre som afløvningsmiddel må anses at være stort set udfaset i USA. 
The use of arsenic acid as a defoliation agent has been more or less phased out in the US.
Stoffet findes i hver fald ikke på den seneste tilgængelige liste over udbredte midler (USDA, 1999). 
At least, the substance does not appear on the most recent list of common agents (USDA, 1999).
I mangel af undersøgelser antages, at der for de enkelte i kemikalie ”worst case” findes ca. 0,005 gram afløvningsmidler per kg bomuld på bomuldsfibrene. 
As there are no studies available, we assume that in the individual worst case chemicals scenarios, there is approx. 0.005 g defoliation agent per kg cotton on the cotton fibres.
Denne mængde viderebringes til tekstilet, hvor det antages, at det hele vaskes ud i forbehandlingen. 
This volume is passed on to the textile where it is assumed that everything is washed out during pre-treatment.
A life cycle assessment study on best available applications and technologies for hotel textile production and services. 
A lifecycle assessment study on best available applications and technologies for hotel textile production and services.
Report prepared by the secretariat for th 52nd Plenary Meetin hled in New Delhi, India. 
Report prepared by the secretariat for the 52nd Plenary Meeting held in New Delhi, India.
County NatWest and Wood Mac Buiness Consultancy Unit. 
County NatWest and Wood Mac Business Consultancy Unit.
Relation of usage to the occurence of cotton and rice herbicides in three streams of the Mississippi Delta. 
Relation of usage to the occurrence of cotton and rice herbicides in three streams of the Mississippi Delta.
Lee J.A. er al, 1984. 
Lee J.A. et al., 1984.
Effects of mechanical prosseing and wet treatments on arsenic acid desiccant residues in cotton. 
Effects of mechanical processing and wet treatments on arsenic acid desiccant residues in cotton.
Hauschild M: Estimating pesticide emissions for LCA of agricultural products. 
Hauschild M: Estimating pesticide emissions for lifecycle assessment of agricultural products.
Fra: B P Weidema og M J G Meeusen (eds.): Agricultural data for life cycle assessments, LCAnet Food. 
From: B P Weidema and M J G Meeusen (eds.): Agricultural data for lifecycle assessments, LCAnet Food.
Kortlægning og afgivelse samt sundhedsmæssig vurdering af kemiske stoffer i babyprodukter 
Survey, emission and health assessment of chemical substances in baby products
SAMMENFATNING OG KONKLUSIONER SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1 KORTLÆGNING 
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS SAMMENFATNING OG KONKLUSIONER 1 SURVEY
1.1 FORMÅL 1.2 AFGRÆNSNING 1.3 FREMGANGSMÅDE 1.4 GENNEMFØRELSE 
1.1 PURPOSE 1.2 DELIMITATION 1.3 PROCEDURE 1.4 IMPLEMENTATION
1.4.1 Besøg i detailforretninger 1.4.2 Internetsøgning 
1.4.1 Visits to retailers 1.4.2 Internet search
1.4.3 Indhentning af oplysninger via spørgeskema 
1.4.3 Obtaining information by questionnaire
1.5 RESULTATER AF KORTLÆGNINGEN 
1.5 RESULTS OF THE SURVEY
1.5.1 Registrering af babyprodukter på markedet 1.5.2 Materialesammensætning 1.5.3 Forbrug fordelt på produkttyper 1.5.4 Vurdering af materialer 1.5.5 Udvælgelseskriterier for babyprodukter til analyser 1.5.6 Udvalgte produkter 
1.5.1 Registration of baby products on the market 1.5.2 Material composition 1.5.3 Consumption divided into on product types 1.5.4 Evaluation of materials 1.5.5 Criteria for selection of baby products for analyses 1.5.6 Selected products
2 KORTLÆGNING AF INDHOLD AF KEMISKE STOFFERKEMISKE UNDERSØGELSER 
2 SURVEY OF CONTENT OF CHEMICAL SUBSTANCESCHEMICAL ANALYSES
2.1.3 Polymere materialer 2.1.4 Polystyrenkugler 2.1.5 Oversigt over udførte analyser 
2.1.3 Polymer materials 2.1.4 Polystyrene pellets 2.1.5 Summary of performed analyses
2.3.4 Puslepuder 2.3.5 Bæreseler 2.3.6 Forlæder til barnevogne 
2.3.4 Nursing pillows 2.3.5 Baby carriers 2.3.6 Apron for perambulators
2.4 ANALYSERESULTATER FOR SPECIFIKKE ANALYSER ORDNET EFTER ANALYSETYPE 
2.4 ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR SPECIFIC ANALYSES ACCORDING TO ANALYSIS TYPE
3.1 INTRODUKTION 3.2 METODER 3.3 UDVALGTE STOFFER 
3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.2 METHOD 3.3 SELECTED SUBSTANCES
3.3.1 Hexabromcyclododecan (HBCD) 3.3.2 Toluen-2,4-diisocyanat (TDI) 3.3.3 2-Ethylhexansyre (2-EHA) 3.3.4 Acetophenon 
3.3.1 Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) 3.3.2 Toluene 2,4-diisocyanate (TDI) 3.3.3 2-Ethylhexanoic acid (2-EHA) 3.3.4 Acetophenone
3.3.8 2-Brom-4,6-dinitroanilin (BDNA) 3.3.9 Hexaethylenglycol dimethylether 3.3.10 Tetrapropylenglycol monomethylether 3.3.11 DEHP 
3.3.8 2-bromo-4,6-dinitroaniline (BDNA) 3.3.9 Hexaethylene glycol dimethyl ether 3.3.10 Tetrapropylene glycol monomethyl ether 3.3.11 DEHP
4.1.1 Hexabromocyclododecan (HBCD) 4.1.2 Toluen-2,4-diisocyanat (TDI) 4.1.3 2-Ethylhexansyre (2-EHA) 4.1.4 Acetophenon 
4.1.1 Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) 4.1.2 Toluene 2,4-diisocyanate (TDI) 4.1.3 2-Ethylhexanoic acid (2-EHA) 4.1.4 Acetophenone
Projektet har haft til formål at belyse omfang og indhold af sundheds- og miljøskadelige stoffer i produkter til babyer samt at klarlægge, om der er sundhedsmæssige problemer for forbrugerne ved anvendelsen af produkterne. 
The purpose of the projects was to illustrate the extent and content of substances hazardous to health and environment in products to babies and to elucidate if health problems exist to the consumer from the use of the products.
Projektet er gennemført af Teknologisk Institut, Materialedivisionen. 
The project is performed by the Danish Technological Institute, Division of Materials.
Projektet blev fulgt af en følgegruppe bestående af følgende: 
The project was followed by a reference group consisting of:
Lea Frimann Hansen Miljøstyrelsen (formand for følgegruppen) 
Lea Frimann Hansen, Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Chairman)
Projektet er finansieret af Miljøstyrelsen. 
The Project is financed by the Danish Environmental Protection Agency.
Mange babyprodukter er beregnet til mere eller mindre at komme i direkte kontakt med babyens hud eller befinde sig tæt på huden. 
Several baby products are intended to more or less to get in direct contact with baby skin or be in close contact to the skin.
Befugtning (i form af vand, spyt, sved eller urin) kan medføre, at indholdsstoffer, der frigives til disse væsker, vil kunne komme i kontakt med barnets hud eller mund. 
Moistening in the form of water, saliva, sweat or urine may cause that substances contained in the products, which can be released to these liquids, may get into contact with the skin or mouth of the baby.
Foruden optagelse af kemiske stoffer gennem huden og ved at en baby sutter på materialet, kan påvirkning også ske ved indånding af luftarter, der langsomt afdamper fra babyproduktet, eller af støvlignende partikler og fiberfnug, der afgives under brug. 
Besides uptake of chemical substances through the skin and from the baby sucking on the material exposure may also take place by inhaling of gasses slowly released/evaporating from the baby product of dusty particles and fibres released during use.
De produkter, der indgår i undersøgelsen, er primært babyprodukter, som er beregnet til børn i alderen 0-1 år. 
The products included in the examination are primarily baby products intended for at children at the age of 0 to 1 year.
Der er bevidst søgt babyprodukter, som på basis af oplysninger fra forhandlere sælges i rimeligt omfang. 
Baby products have been deliberately selected that based on information from retailers are sold to a reasonable extent.
Projektet har primært drejet sig om produkter af tekstil eller plast med polstring eller fyld. 
The project primarily concerned products of textile or plastic with an upholstery or padding.
Derudover indgår også babyprodukter af fleksibelt skummateriale. 
In addition also baby products of flexible foam material were included.
Babytøj, sengelinned (dynebetræk), formede plastgenstande (badekar, potter, sutter, børnetallerkener), børnebestik samt legetøj, træsenge og babyplejemidler er ikke omfattet af projektet. 
Baby clothing, bed linen (bolster case), shaped plastic objects (bath tubs, chamber pots, comforters, and baby plates), baby cutlery, and toys, wooden beds (cots) and baby care agents/remedies were not included in the project.
Kortlægning I kortlægningen indgår følgende aktiviteter: 
Survey In the survey, the following activities are included:
• Kontakt til detailhandel 
• Contact to retailers
• Søgning på Internet 
• Search on the Internet
• Anvendelse af spørgeskema 
• Use of questionnaires
• Vurdering af materialerne i de forskellige typer babyprodukter med hensyn til indhold af sundhedsskadelige stoffer. 
• Evaluation of the material from the different types of baby products relating to the content of health hazardous substances.
Forbrug af babyprodukter 
Consumption of baby products