natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I overensstemmelse med ”realistic worst case” princippet er her anvendt Rfd værdien på 20 µg/kg lgv/d som tolerabel vurderingsværdi. 
In agreement with the worst case principle the lowest available tolerable dose, the RfD value of 20 µg/kg bw/day has been used in the evaluation.
Af ovenstående ses, at ingen af de mængder, der indtages eller optages ved indånding, vil medføre en dosis på over 20 µg/kg lgv/d, hvorfor dette vurderes ikke at ville indebære nogen sundhedsmæssig risiko. 
From the above it is seen that none of the amounts being ingested or absorbed will result in a dose of more than 20 µg/kg bw/day, for which reason it is assessed not to involve any health risk.
Naphthalen indebærer ingen sundhedsmæssig risiko ved oral indtagelse eller optagelse i de mængder, der er konstateret ved analyse af de udvalgte tandbørster. 
Naphthalene implies no health risks to the consumer by oral intake or inhalation at the concentrations measured in the selected toothbrushes.
1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorethan bliver produceret ved klorering af ethylen, ethan eller 1,2 dichlorethan. 
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane is being produced by chlorination of ethylene, ethane or 1,2-dichlorethane.
Oprindelsen kan skyldes anvendelsen i produktionen af polymerer eller anvendelse som solvent i lim. 
The source of the recoveries might be the use in the production of polymers or the use as solvent in adhesives.
Det vil sige, at 1,1,2,2-tetrachlorethan kan være en rest fra anvendelsen i produktionsprocessen, men kan også være et tilfældigt biprodukt fra produktionen af et andet stof, der indgår i produktionen. 
Thus, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane can be a residue from the use in the production process, but it can also be an accidental by-product from the production of another substance, which is used in the production.
1,1,2,2-tetrachlorethan, CAS nr. 79-34-5, er klassificeret (Miljøministeriet 2002): 
1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorethane, CAS no. 79-34-5, is classified (Miljøministeriet 2002):
Giftig for organismer, der lever i vand; kan forårsage uønskede langtidsvirkninger i vandmiljøet 
Very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment
Referencen har omregnet eksponeringen til en NOAEL 60 µg/kg/dag med en antaget optagelse på 50% (Hassauer et al. 1993). 
The reference has recalculated the exposure to a NOAEL of 60 µg/kg/day assuming an absorption from inhalation of 50% (Hassauer et al. 1993).
Baseret på resultaterne af korttids- eller subkroniske forsøg synes leveren at være det mest følsomme målorgan. 
Based on the results of principally limited short term and subchronic studies, the liver appears to be the most sensitive target organ.
I et rottestudium med korttids oral optagelse af 1,1,2,2-tetrachlorethan blev der ved den laveste dosering observeret effekter på lever, nyrer og effekter på testikler. 
In a rat study with short-time oral exposure of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, hepathotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, effects on testes etc. were observed at the lowest dose level.
LOAEL var derfor 8 mg/kg lgv/dag (Hassauer et al. 1993). 
Thus, LOAEL was 8 mg/kg bw/day (Hassauer et al. 1993).
Resultaterne har ikke kunnet genfindes i andre dyrearter. 
It has not been possible to repeat the results in other species of animal.
Eksponeringen i 78 uger for 0, 142 eller 284 mg/kg lgv/dag er anvendt i en amerikansk model (”multistage model”), til vurdering af stoffets carcinogene potens. 
The exposure for 78 weeks for 0, 142 or 284 mg/kg bw/day is used in an American model (Multistage model) for the evaluation of its carcinogenic potency.
ADI for langtidsoral optagelse på 0,3 µg/kg lgv/d (baseret på en NOAEL for rotter på 3,2 mg/kg lgv/dag og en usikkerhedsfaktor på 10000) (Hassauer et al. 1993). 
ADI for long-time oral absorption of 0.3 µg/kg bw/day (based on a NOAEL for rats of 3.2 mg/kg bw/day and a safety factor of 10000) (Hassauer et al. 1993).
Regneeksempel med udgangspunkt i den højest målte migration på 0,41 µg/tandbørste: 
Example of calculation based on the highest migration measured of 0.41 µg/toothbrush:
Til vurderingen er anvendt den lavest fundne ADI værdien på 0,3 µg/kg lgv/d (se sektionen for grænseværdier). 
For the evaluation, the lowest found ADI value of 0.3 µg/kg bw/day has been used (se the section for threshold limit values).
Af ovenstående ses, at ingen af de mængder, der indtages eller optages ved tandbørstning, vil medføre en dosis på over ADI værdien på 0,3 µg/kg lgv/d, hvorfor dette vurderes ikke at ville indebære nogen sundhedsmæssig risiko. 
From the above it is seen that none of the amounts being ingested or absorbed by toothbrushing will result in a dose above the ADI value of 0.3 µg/kg bw/day, for which reason it is assessed not to involve any health risk.
1,1,2,2-tetrachlorethan indebærer ingen sundhedsmæssig risiko ved indtagelse i de mængder, der er konstateret ved analyse af de udvalgte tandbørster. 
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane implies no health risks to the consumer by oral intake at the concentrations measured in the selected toothbrushes.
Vandopløseligheden er 450 mg/L ved 25 °C) (OECD 2002c). 
The water solubility is 450 mg/l at 25°C (OECD 2002c).
Fordelingskoefficienten log Kow er eksperimentelt bestemt til 3,42 (OECD 2002b). 
The partitioning coefficient log Kow has experimentally been determined to 3.42 (OECD 2002c).
Klassifikation 3,5,5-Trimethyl-1-hexanol er ikke klassificeret (Miljøministeriet 2002) 
Classification 3,5,5-Trimethyl-1-hexanol is not classified (Miljøministeriet 2002)
I et akut oralstudie på rotter, hvor der anvendtes doseringerne 500, 1000 og 2000 mg/kg, var der ingen dødsfald. 
In a study for oral toxicity in rats, a single dose toxicity test at 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg was performed.
Der blev observeret en let til moderat effekt i nyrerne ved henholdsvis 60 og 300 mg/kg/dag hos hanner og hunner. 
A slight to moderate effect was observed in the kidneys at 60 and 300 mg/kg/day for males and females, respectively.
På basis af observationerne blev NOAEL for gentagen dosering fastsat til 12 mg/kg/dag (OECD 2002c). 
Based on these observations NOAEL for repeated dose toxicity was set at 12 mg/kg/day (OECD 2002c).
Dermale og inhalationsstudier på 3,5,5-trimethyl-1-hexanol kunne ikke findes. 
Dermal and inhalation studies on 3,5,5-trimethyl-1-hexanol are not available.
Der er ingen tilgængelige informationer mht. mennesker. 
There is no available information on humans.
6.2.12.2 Grænseværdier Der er ikke fundet nogen. 
6.2.12.2 Threshold limit values None found.
Tabel 6.13 Analyseresultater og estimeret indtagelse af 3,5,5-trimethyl-1hexanol 
Table 6.13 Analysis results and estimated ingestion of 3,5,5-trimethyl-1hexanol
3,5,5-Trimethyl-1-hexanol er således påvist i 1 af produkterne i mængder over detektionsgrænsen på 0,25 µg/tandbørste. 
3,5,5-Trimethyl-1-hexanol has thus been detected in 1 of the products in amounts above the detection limit of 0.25 µg/toothbrush.
Af ovenstående ses, at ingen af de mængder, der indtages eller optages ved tandbørstning, vil medføre en dosis på over 12 µg/kg, hvorfor dette vurderes ikke at ville indebære nogen sundhedsmæssig risiko. 
From the table above it is seen that none of the amounts being ingested or absorbed by toothbrushing will result in a dose above 12 µg/kg, for which reason it is assessed not to involve any health risk.
Sikkerhedsmarginen mellem NOAEL værdien og eksponeringen er ca. 12000/0,00077=15600, hvilket må anses for tilstrækkeligt. 
The margin of safety between the NOAEL value and the exposure level is approx. 12000/0.00077 = 15600, which is considered sufficient.
3,5,5-Trimethyl-1-hexanol indebærer ingen sundhedsmæssig risiko ved indtagelse i de mængder, der er konstateret ved analyse af de udvalgte tandbørster. 
3,5,5-Trimethyl-1-hexanol implies no health risks to the consumer by oral intake at the concentrations measured in the selected toothbrushes.
6.2.13 Nikkel Identifikation af stoffet Navn 
6.2.13 Nickel Identification Name
IUPAC navn Nickel 
IUPAC name Nickel
Klassificering Nikkel er klassificeret: Carc3;R40 R43. 
Classification Nickel is classified: Carc3;R40 R43
De fleste nikkelforbindelser er klassificeret for stoffets allergene egenskab med R43, kan forårsage overfølsomhed ved kontakt med huden. 
Most nickel compounds are classified for sensitisation potentials as R43, May cause sensitization by skin contact.
En række nikkelforbindelser er enten kendt kræftfremkaldende eller mistænkt for at være kræftfremkaldende, som f.eks. nikkelcarbonat og nikkelsulfat. 
A range of nickel compounds is either known as carcinogenic or suspected to be carcinogenic, as e.g. nickel carbonate and nickel sulphate.
Endvidere er de fleste nikkelforbindelser klassificeret miljøfarlige med R50/53, meget giftige for vandlevende organismer og ikke nedbrydelige. 
Furthermore, most nickel compounds are classified as dangerous for the environment at R50/53, Very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment.
6.2.13.1 Effekt på sundhed 
6.2.13.1 Effect on health
Hudkontakt med nikkel er meget væsentlig, da de fleste nikkelforbindelser kan forårsage allergiske reaktioner hos sensibiliserede personer. 
Skin contact with nickel is very essential, as most nickel compounds may cause allergic reactions at sensitised persons.
EU har inkluderet nikkel i risikovurderingsprogrammet for eksisterende stoffer, men den er endnu ikke færdig (ECB 2002). 
EU has included nickel in the risk evaluation programme for existing substances, but this has not yet been completed (ECB 2002).
Den tolerable daglige dosis ved indtagelse (TDI) er beregnet til 5 µg/kg lgv/dag (WHO 1996). 
The tolerable daily dose at ingestion (TDI) has been calculated to 5 µg/kg bw/day (WHO 1996).
Nikkel er således påvist at migrere fra alle produkterne i mængder over detektionsgrænsen på 0,005 µg/tandbørste. 
Nickel has thus been detected to migrate from all the products in amounts above the detection limit of 0.005 µg/toothbrush.
Den af WHO beregnede TDI-værdi var 5 µg pr kg legemsvægt, som den laveste af de to fundne TDI værdier. 
The tolerable daily intake calculated by WHO was at 5 µg/kg bw as the lowest of the two available TDI-values.
Af ovenstående beregninger i tabellen ses, at ingen af de mængder, der indtages eller optages ved tandbørstning, vil medføre en dosis på over 5 µg/kg lgv/d, hvorfor dette vurderes ikke at ville indebære nogen sundhedsmæssig risiko. 
From the above calculations in the table it is seen that none of the amounts being ingested or absorbed by toothbrushing will result in a dose of more than 5 µg/kg bw/day, for which reason it is assessed not to involve any health risk.
Nikkel indebærer ingen sundhedsmæssig risiko ved indtagelse i de mængder, der er konstateret ved analyse af de udvalgte tandbørster. 
Nickel implies no health risks to the consumer by oral intake at the concentrations measured in the migration analyses of the selected toothbrushes.
Nikkel er et kendt allergen. 
Nickel is a well-known allergen.
Der er ikke oplysninger om, hvilke værdier man skal op på for at udelukke muligheden, da den er individuel og afhængig af, hvor følsom den pågældende person er. 
There is no information as to how high the values should be in order to exclude the possibility of allergic reactions, as it is individual and dependent on the sensitivity of the person concerned.
Der tages derfor forbehold for eventuelt særligt følsomme personer. 
Consequently, reservations are made regarding particularly sensitive persons.
Baseret på de målte koncentrationer af 13 enkeltstoffer, der er migreret til kunstigt spyt fra 5 hele tandbørster, og med anvendelsen af det foreslåede eksponeringsscenarie, kunne det samlet konkluderes, at ingen af enkeltstofferne optrådte i koncentrationer, der overskred de anvendte værdier for tolerabelt dagligt indtag. 
Based on the measured concentrations of 13 single substances, which have been detected migrating to artificial saliva from the 5 complete toothbrushes, and using the suggested exposure scenario, the overall conclusion was that none of the single substances were found in concentrations exceeding the used values for tolerable daily intake.
Yderligere forfining af sundhedsvurderingen ved at reducere eksponeringen til dele af tandbørsten eller reducere eksponeringstiden (eller øge den i visse tilfælde) er anset for kun at ville give uvæsentlige ændringer. 
Further refinement of the health evaluation by reducing the exposure for parts of the toothbrush or reducing the exposure time (or increasing, in certain cases) is considered only to result in unimportant changes.
Sikkerhedsafstandene mellem de skønnede indtag og de anvendte tolerable værdier var som regel mere end 1000, så en sådan øvelse er derfor ikke udført. 
The safety distance between the estimated intakes and the used tolerable values was as a rule more than 1000, for which reason such an examination has not been carried out.
At vurderingen yderligere er baseret på et barn med en kropsvægt på 10 kg, og en antagelse af en ret stor absorption, har selvfølgelig været med til at øge sikkerhedsafstanden. 
The fact that the evaluation is furthermore based on a child with a body weight of 10 kg, and an assumption of a rather high absorption, has - of course - been a contributory factor increasing the safety margin.
Der er i vurderingerne ikke taget hensyn til, at der kan være specielt følsomme forbrugere (allergikere eller lignende), der alligevel vil kunne få problemer med visse tandbørster. 
In the evaluations it has not been taken into consideration that particularly sensitive consumers (allergic or the like) might experience problems using some of the toothbrushes.
Det konkluderes derfor samlet, at de vurderede stofafgivelser ikke medfører sundhedsrisiko for forbrugeren ved brug af tandbørster. 
Overall it was concluded that the evaluated migrated substances do not constitute a health risk for the consumer when using the toothbrushes.
Alligevel kunne man måske opfordre producenterne til at være lidt mere opmærksomme på, at anvendelsen af visse stoffer burde/kunne reduceres yderligere, når de klassificeres f.eks. som mistænkt for at kunne være carcinogene (f.eks. naphthalen) eller reprotoksiske (f.eks. dimethylacetamid). 
At the same time, the producers could be urged to be more aware of the fact that the use of some substances should/could be further reduced when they are classified as possible carcinogenic (e.g. naphthalene) or repro-toxic (e.g. dimethylacetamide).
Specielt hvis deres tilstedeværelse i produktet er unødvendig eller mindre væsentlig. 
Especially, if their presence in the product is not necessary or less significant.
Kunne de fjernes ved anvendelsen af et alternativt stof, burde dette overvejes, også selv om eksponeringen er lille. 
It should be considered whether they could be removed by substitute substances, even though the exposure to the consumer is considered insignificant.
NB ikke implementeret i dansk lovgivning bekg. af listen over farlige stoffer (Miljøministeriet 2002) 
Note: Nor yet implementet in Daish Legislation" Statutory Order on the List of Dangerous Substances (Miljøministeriet 2002).
Clayton GD and Clayton FE (eds.)( 
Clayton GD, Clayton FE (eds.)(
CSTEE (1998): Opinion on Phthalate migration from soft PVC toys and child-care articles. 
CSTEE (1998a): Opinion on Phthalate migration from soft PVC toys and child-care articles.
CSTEE (1998): Opinion on Phthalate migration from soft PVC toys and 
CSTEE (1998b): Opinion on Phthalate migration from soft PVC toys and child-care articles.
Prepared by Norwegian Pollution Control Authority for the European Commission, European Chemicals Bureau. 
EU risk assessment report prepared as part of the EU risk assessment programme on existing substances for the European Chemicals Bureau, Ispra, Italy.
World Health Organization, Geneva. 
International Programme on Chemical Safety.
Jenner, P.M., Hagan, E.C., Taylor, J.M., Cook, E.L. & Fitzhugh, O.G. (1964) Food flavorings and compounds of related structure. 
Jenner PM, Hagan EC, Taylor JM, Cook EL, Fitzhugh OG (1964): Food flavorings and compounds of related structure.
2nd ed. Volume II:trogen and Phosphorus Solvents. 
2nd ed. Volume II: Nitrogen and Phosphorus Solvents.
Bilag A: Liste over erhvervede tandbørster 
Encl. A: List of toothbrushes purchased
Oplysninger angivet på emballagen 
Information stated on the packaging
N-002 Lilla m. gult skaft m. lilla slange 
N-002 Purple with yellow handle with purple snake
Ekstra bløde børstehår 
Extra soft bristles
N-003 Grå m. hvide og lilla børstehår M-001 
N-003 Grey with white and purple bristles M-001
M-002 Ensfarvet gul 
M-002 Plain yellow
M-004 Hvid m. tryk 
M-004 White with print
Ekstra bløde, afrundede børster. 
Extra soft rounded bristles.
SAN skaft, polyamidbørster. 
SAN handle, polyamide bristles.
Dansk produceret M-008 Sort/hvidt skaft, sorte/hvide/grå børstehår M-009 Orange/rød, mangefarvede børster 
Produced in Denmark M-008 Black/white handle, black/white/grey bristles M-009 Orange/red, multi-coloured bristles Brush head with soft rubber edge.
Børstehoved m. blød gummikant. 
Varying structure of bristles
B-004 Sort/transparent skaft, hvide/sorte børstehår 
B-004 Black/transparent handle, white/black bristles
Bløde børstehår, gummigreb 
Soft bristles, rubber handle
Gråt skaft: polypropylen Lilla dele: "SBS" elastomer med stort kridtindhold. 
Grey handle: polypropylene Purple parts: "SBS" elastomer with a high content of chalk
Tryk: Acryl-baseret binder 
Print: acrylic-based binder
Gult skaft: polypropylen copolymer Blåt og grønt indlæg: "SBS" elastomer med højt kridtindhold 
Yellow handle: polypropylene copolymer Blue and green insert: "SBS" elastomer with a high content of chalk
Gult skaft: polypropylen copolymer 
Yellow handle: polypropylene copolymer
M-003 Blå børster: polyamid 
M-003 Blue bristles: polyamide
Lyserøde børster: polyamid 
Pink bristles: polyamide
Lilla børster: polyamid 
Purple bristles: polyamide
Orange børster: polyamid 
Orange bristles: polyamide
Lyst skaft med glimmer: Polypropylen Lilla del: Styren ethylen elastomer med stort kridtindhold 
Light handle with mica: polypropylene Purple part: styrene ethylene elastomer with a high content of chalk
Skaft: styren acrylonitril, SAN 
Handle: styrene acrylonitril, SAN
Blåt hus: polyester 
Blue house: polyester
Hvidt skaft: polypropylen homopolymer Sort indlæg: "SBS" elastomer med højt kridtindhold 
White handle: polypropylene homopolymer Black insert: "SBS" elastomer with a high content of chalk
Røde børster: polyamid 
Red bristles: polyamide
Gule børster: polyamid 
Yellow bristles: polyamide
Tryk: Kan være acryl-baseret binder 
Print: might be acrylic-based binder
Tryk: Formodentligt polyesterbaseret binder 
Print: presumably polyesterbased binder
Blåt skaft: polypropylen copolymer 
Blue handle: polypropylene copolymer
Pink dele: "SBS" elastomer med højt kridt indhold 
Pink parts: "SBS" elastomer with a high content of chalk.
Sikkerhedsring: poluoxymethylen, POM 
Safety ring: polyoxymethylene, POM
Lilla skaft: polypropylen homopolymer Gul del: Styren ethylen elastomer med stort kridtindhold 
Yellow part: styrene ethylene elastomer with a high content of chalk
Gult skaft: polypropylen med ukendt tilsætning Orange del: Ethylen-propylen-styren elastomer 
Yellow handle: polypropylene with unknown additives Orange part: ethylene-propylene-styrene elastomer
Klart skaft: polyester Sort del: styren-ethylen-XX elastomer 
Clear handle: polyester Black part: styrene-ethylene elastomer
B-005 Hvide børster: polyamid Blå gummibørster: Styren ethylen elastomer med stort kridtindhold 
B-005 White bristles: polyamide Blue rubber bristles: styrene ethylene elastomer with a high content of chalk
Skaftdele: polyoxymethylen, POM 
Handle parts: polyoxymethylene, POM
B-007 Pink børster: polyamid 
B-007 Pink bristles: polyamide
Mørkeblåt skaft: polypropylen copolymer Pink del: styren ethylen elastomer med stort kridtindhold 
Dark blue handle: polypropylene copolymer Pink part: styrene ethylene elastomer with a high content of chalk
Grønne børster: polyamid 
Green bristles: polyamide
Grønne "gummi" børster: 
Green “rubber” bristles
B-009 Grønne børster: polyamid Gult skaft: polypropylen copolymer Grøn del: styren ethylen elastomer med stort kridtindhold 
B-009 Green bristles: polyamide Yellow handle: polypropylene copolymer Green part: styrene ethylene elastomer with a high content of chalk
Gråt skaft: polypropylen homopolymer Orange del: Styren ethylen elastomer med stort kridtindhold 
Grey handle: polypropylene homopolymer Orange part: styrene ethylene elastomer with a high content of chalk
Bilag C: GC-MS Analyse resultater fra screening 
Encl. C: GC-MS analysis results from screening
Hele tandbørsten anvendes ved migrationsanalysen. 
The entire toothbrush is used at the migration analysis.
Hvert ekstrakt analyseres i SCAN mode. 
The residue is washed more times with dechlormethane.
De mest informative chromatogrammer viste sig at stamme fra opberedningen med SPE, og opberedningen ved inddampning anvendtes derfor til verifikation. 
The other portion of the migration liquid is prepared by means of ”solid phase extraction” (SPE).
Hvis forbindelsen ikke kunne identificeres vha.st biblioteket, er forbindelsen angivet med to spørgsmålstegn efterfulgt af hovedionerne i massespektret. 
The filters are conditioned, and the migration liquid from each toothbrush is sucked through an SPE filter.
Resultaterne angives i µg totalt pr. tandbørste. 
Description of method and data processing
oC. Reminensen vaskes med dichlormethan flere gange. 
Selected compounds found at the screening
Til gengæld er der store ligheder, og derfor er den fundne forbindelse af samme type som den opgivne angivet i skemaet. 
At the top of the table the known added amount of internal standard together with the response for this are shown.
Hvis forbindelsen ikke kunne identificeres vha.st biblioteket, er forbindelsen angivet med to spørgsmålstegn efterfulgt af hovedionerne i massespektret. 
It is assumed that all the compounds have the same extraction efficiency and response factor as the internal standard (semi-quantitative determination).
På denne måde er det angivet, om den samme ukendte forbindelse findes i flere af prøverne. 
Therefore, based on each compound, the measured response has been stated and subsequently converted into mg.
Resultaterne angives i µg totalt pr. tandbørste. 
However, it does not contribute to further interesting compounds.
3 "methylpropoxy-propanol" 4 N,N-dimethyl-acetamid 5 Cyclohexanon 6 2-butoxy-ethanol 
3 "methylpropoxy-propanole" 4 N,N-dimethyl-acetamide 5 Cyclohexanon 6 2-butoxy-ethanole
8 "methylpropoxy-propanol" 9 1,1,2,2 tetrachlorethan 
8 "methylpropoxy-propanole" 9 1,1,2,2 tetrachlorethane
11 1-butoxy-2-propanol 12 "methoxy-butanol acetat" 
11 1-butoxy-2-propanole 12 "methoxy-butanole acetate"
24 Benzosyre methyl ester 
24 Benzoic acid methyl ester
26 Pentandisyre dimethyl ester 27 "Tetramethylbenzen" 
26 Pentandioic acid dimethyl ester 27 "Tetramethylbenzene"
38 "butoxyethoxy ethanol acetat" 39 ?? 
38 "butoxyethoxy ethanol acetate" 39 ??
*: RT: retentionstid i analysen 
*: RT: retention time in the analysis
45 Alkan/alken-amid C6-C12 46 alken/alkohol C16-C18 47 ?? 
45 Alkan/alken-amide C6-C12 46 alken/alcohol C16-C18 47 ??
54 4-methyl benzensulfonamid [el. 
54 4-methyl-benzene sulphonamide [or
57 4-(dimethylamino)-benzosyre ethyl 
57 4-(dimethylamino)-benzoic acid ethyl
61 "dimethoxy-diphenyl-ethanon" 62 "BHT" 
61 "dimethoxy-diphenyl-ethanone" 62 "BHT"
65 alken/alkohol C16-C18 66 alken/alkohol C20+ 
65 alken/alcohol C16-C18 66 alken/alcohol C20+
67 4-benzoyl-benzosyre methyl ester 15,31 68 ?? 
67 4-benzoyl-benzoic acid methyl ester 15.31 68 ??
71 Benzylbutylphthalat 72 "phosphorsyre, tris(2ethylhexyl) 
71 Benzyl butyl phthalate 72 "phosphoric acid, tris(2ethylhexyl)
4 N,N-dimethyl-acetamid 
4 N,N-dimethyl-acetamide
12 "methoxy-butanol acetat" 
12 "methoxy-butanol acetate"
24 Benzosyre methyl ester 25 "Tetramethylbenzen" 26 Pentandisyre dimethyl ester 27 "Tetramethylbenzen" 28 Naphthalen 
24 Benzoic acid methyl ester 25 "Tetramethyl benzene" 26 Pentandioic acid dimethyl ester 27 "Tetramethyl benzene" 28 Naphthalene
45 Alkan/alken-amid C6-C12 
45 Alkan/alken-amide C6-C12
54 4-methyl benzensulfonamid [el. 
54 4-methyl benzene sulphonamide [el.