natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
DANMAX - dansk beamlinje til MAX IV 
DANMAX – Danish beam line for MAX IV
35.000.000 
4,695,000
DanSeis - Nationalt Center for Seismisk Instrumentering 
DanSeis – National Centre for Seismic Instrumentation
25.000.000 
3,353,000
Reorganisering og styrkelse af dansk e-science 
Danish e-science restructuring and advancement
50.000.000 
6,707,000
Dansk Instrumentcenter for Ultra-Højfelts NMR Spektroskopi 
Danish Center for Ultrahigh-Field NMR Spectroscopy
33.000.000 
4,426,000
DigHumLab - Digitalt Humaniora Laboratorium 
DigHumLab – Digital Humanities Lab
30.000.000 
4,024,000
EATRIS - European Advanced Translational Research Infrastructure for Medicine 
EATRIS – European Advanced Translational Research Infrastructure in Medicine
27.000.000 
3,622,000
ELIXIR – European Research Infrastructure for Biological Information 
ELIXIR – European Life Science Infrastructure for Biological Information
Laserlab.dk - Danish Centre for Laser Infrastructure 
Laserlab.dk - Danish National Laser Centre
20.300.000 
2,723,000
Reorganisering og styrkelse af dansk registerforskning* 
Reorganisation and strengthening of Danish register research*
22.400.000 
3,005,000
Stor national vindtunnel 
Large-Scale National Wind Tunnel Facility
40.000.000 
5,365,000
307.700.000 
41,274,000
Finansieringen behøver imidlertid ikke nødvendigvis at ske via statslige midler alene. 
The financing, however, need not necessarily be exclusively from public-sector sources.
Det er forhåbningen, at roadmappens katalog med forslag vil tjene som inspirationskatalog for andre finansierende kilder som for eksempel forskningsfinansierende fonde og regionale aktører. 
The hope is that the Roadmap's catalogue of proposals will serve as an inspirational directory for other funding sources such as research-financing foundations and regional investors.
Milepæl for 2020: 
Milestone for 2020:
Kataloget har dannet grundlaget for nye investeringer i danske nationale forskningsinfrastrukturer. 
The catalogue has provided a basis for new investments in Danish national research infrastructures.
Finansieringen skal følge med 
Funding must keep pace
De danske investeringer i forskningsinfrastruktur er allerede betydelige. 
Danish investments in research infrastructure are already substantial.
Ministeriets samlede direkte investeringer beløber sig til omtrent 787 millioner kroner i 2015. 
The Ministry's direct investments totalled around EUR 106 million in 2015.
Tabel 3.2 
Table 3.2
Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriets samlede investeringer i forskningsinfrastruktur 2015 
Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science total investments in research infrastructure 2015
Den Europæiske Organisation for Astronomisk Forskning – ESO 
The European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere European Southern Observatory (ESO)
Den Europæiske Rumorganisation – ESA (obligatorisk) 
The European Space Agency ESA (mandatory participation)
Det Europæiske Molekylærbiologiske Laboratorium – EMBL 
The European Molecular Biology Laboratory EMBL
Den Europæiske Synkrotronfacilitet – ESRF 
The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility ESRF
Den Europæiske Fri-Elektron Røntgenlaserfacilitet – European XFEL 
The European X-Ray Free Electron Laser Facility European XFEL
Fælleseuropæiske eksperimenter ved norsk reaktor i Halden 
Joint European experiments at the Norwegian reactor in Halden (OECD Halden Reactor Project)
124.200.000 
16,660,000
21.900.000 
2,938,000
110.600.000 
14,835,000
15.500.000 
2,079,000
10.700.000 
1,435,000
16.600.000 
2,227,000
2.400.000 
322,000
Andre internationale medlemskaber Den Europæiske Rumorganisation – ESA 
Other international memberships The European Space Agency ESA
(ikke-obligatorisk)* 
(optional)*
Andre internationale medlemskaber International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor – ITER 
Other international memberships The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor project ITER
115.200.000 
15,452,000
400.000 
54,000
Andre internationale medlemskaber European Spallation Source – ESS 211.500.000 
Other international memberships European Spallation Source ESS 28,370,000
ELT ** 
ELT **
Særlige danske forskningsinfrastrukturer 
Special Danish research infrastructures
Registerforskning 
Register research
9.800.000 
1,315,000
Dansk Data Arkiv – DDA sundhed 
Danish Data Archive DDA Health
3.400.000 
456,000
Computing og e-science 
Computing and e-science
14.800.000 
1,985,000
Højhastighedsnet 
High-speed networks
51.500.000 
6,908,000
Forskningsstation Zackenberg 
The Zackenberg Research Station
3.500.000 
469,000
Andre internationale medlemskaber European Extremely Large Telescope – E- 
Other international memberships European Extremely Large Telescope E-
3.800.000 
510,000
Frie midler til nye forskningsinfrastrukturer 
Open funds for new research infrastructures
Pulje til forskningsinfrastruktur 70.900.000 
National Fund for Research Infrastructure 9,510,000
I alt 786.700.000 
Total 105,706,000
Kilde: Finansloven 2015 
Source: 2015 National Budget
Note: I tabellen er ikke medtaget det indirekte bidrag, som Danmark betaler til ITER via Euratoms budget. 
Note: The table does not include the indirect contribution paid by Denmark to ITER via the Euratom budget.
Medtaget er heller ikke en række mindre poster på finansloven, som er målrettet administrative følgeudgifter og formidlingsvirksomhed. 
It also does not include a number of minor items in the National Budget earmarked for administrative overheads and dissemination/outreach activities.
* svarende til udbetalingsniveauet i 2015. 
equivalent to the 2015 expenditure level.
** knytter sig til Danmarks konventionsbårne medlemskab af ESO 
** by virtue of Denmark's convention-based membership of ESO
Denne positive udvikling dækker overvejende over, at dansk deltagelse og investeringer i internationale forskningsinfrastrukturer er steget markant. 
This positive trend generally reflects a significant increase in Danish participation and investment in international research infrastructures.
Her skal særligt nævnes European Spallation Source (ESS), Den Europæiske Fri-Elektron Røntgenlaserfacilitet (European XFEL) og European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT), som alle er under etablering i disse år. 
Notable examples are the European Spallation Source (ESS); the European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Facility (European XFEL) and the European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT), all of which are currently under construction.
Samtidig er balancen mellem midler, der er øremærket til specifikke formål, og midler, som er til rådighed til medfinansiering af nye forslag fra de danske universiteter og forskningsinstitutioner til nye forskningsinfrastrukturer, blevet rykket. 
At the same time, the balance between funds earmarked for specific purposes, and funds made available for co-funding of new proposals from the Danish universities and research insti-
Nedenstående figur 3.1 og 3.2 baseret på kategorierne i ovenstående tabel 3.2 viser, at frie midler i 2007 udgjorde 32 procent af mini- 
Figures 3.1 and 3.2 below, which are based on the categories in Table 3.2 above, indicate that open funds in 2007 accounted for 32 per cent of the Ministry's investments, but in 2015 for 9 per cent.
Det finansielle råderum for at investere i nye nationale forskningsinfrastrukturer er således blevet mindre. 
The financial scope for investing in new national research infrastructures has thus been reduced.
Figur 3.1 
Figure 3.1
Fordeling af investeringer på Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriets finanslov 2007 
Breakdown of investments in the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science's annual appropriations in National Budget 2007
Andre internationale medlemskaber: 16 procent 
Other international Special Danish memberships: research
Konventions- bårne medlemskaber: 33 procent 
Convention- based international memberships: 33 per cent
Figur 3.2 
Figure 3.2
Fordeling af investeringer på Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriets finanslov 2015 
Breakdown of investments in the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science's annual appropriations in National Budget 2015
Særlige danske forsknings- internationale medlemskaber: 42 procent 
11 per cent
Pulje til Forskningsinfrastruktur: 9 procent infrastrukturer: 
National Fund for Research Infrastructure: 9 per cent infrastructures:
11 procent 
11 per cent
TEKSTBOKS 3.5: INVESTERINGSSBEHOVET I NATIONALE FORSKNINGSINFRASTRUKTUR 
TEXT BOX 3.5: THE NEED FOR INVESTMENT IN NATIONAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE
Disse 42 forslag er prioriteret på tværs af de danske universiteter og forskningsinstitutioner og fremsendt i en national proces. 
These 42 proposals were prioritised across the Danish universities and research institutions and submitted in a national procedure.
Hertil skal lægges de forslag, som ikke er blevet prioriteret tilstrækkeligt højt af universiteterne og forskningsinstitutionerne til at blive fremsendt som nationale forslag. 
To this must be added proposals that have not been accorded sufficiently high priority by the universities and research institutions for them to be presented as national proposals.
Det er vanskeligt at sammenligne investeringerne i forskningsinfrastruktur på tværs af europæiske lande. 
It is difficult to compare investments in research infrastructure across European countries.
Imidlertid er udviklingen og finansieringen af nationale roadmaps en almen foreteelse i Europa – ikke kun i regi af European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI), jævnfør afsnit 3.4 nedenfor, men også på nationalt niveau, hvilket muliggør en skønsmæssig sammenligning. 
However, the production and funding of national roadmaps are commonplace in Europe, and not only under the auspices of the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ES- FRI), see Section 3.4 below, but also at the respective national level, which thus makes a rough comparison possible.
Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet har derfor gennemført en rundspørge blandt en række lande, Danmark typisk sammenligner sig med, og som alle i de seneste år har udviklet nationale roadmaps for forskningsinfrastruktur. 
To that end, the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science conducted a survey of a number of the countries Denmark typically compares itself with, and which have all in recent years produced national roadmaps for research infrastructure.
Rundspørgen har alene vedrørt investeringerne i forslag til nye forskningsinfrastrukturer på de nationale roadmaps. 
The survey solely concerned investments in proposed new research infrastructures on the national roadmaps.
Informationen fra Finland, Nederlandene, Norge og Sverige giver et generelt indtryk af danske investeringer over for en række andre landes investeringsniveauer. 
The information from Finland, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden offers a general impression of Danish investments relative to the investment levels of a number of other countries.
Den viser, at Danmark blandt disse ligger lavest i investeringsniveau. 
It reveals that, among these, Denmark ranks at the lowest investment level.
I varierende grad er en del af forklaringen på dette, at der er forskelle på landenes politik for investeringer i nye forskningsinfrastrukturer på deres roadmaps. 
To a varying degree, part of the explanation for this is the difference in national policy on investment in new research infrastructures on the respective roadmaps.
Således finansierer man eksempelvis i Sverige, via det svenske Vetenskabs- rådet, fra centrale nationale puljer såvel etablering og implementering som dele af driften af nye nationale forskningsinfrastrukturer. 
This means that, in Sweden for example, the creation and implementation plus a share of the operating costs of new national research infrastructures are financed by centralised national funds via the Swedish Research Council.
Det forklarer i hvert fald delvist, at de svenske centrale midler til finansiering af svenske roadmaps er betydeligt større end de danske, som omvendt kun er møntet forskningsinfrastrukturernes etablering og implementering. 
To some extent, this accounts for why the Swedish centralised funds for financing of Swedish roadmap proposals are substantially larger than the Danish funds, which are allocated solely for the establishment and implementation of the research infrastructures.
I alle de adspurgte lande bidrager en vis grad af medfinansiering fra universiteter og andre forskningsinstitutioner til at finansiere de nye nationale forskningsinfrastrukturer på roadmap- pen. 
In all the surveyed countries, a certain amount of co-funding from universities and other research institutions helps to finance the new national research infrastructures on the respective roadmap.
Medfinansieringsgraden varierer samtidig fra land til land, og eksempelvis skønnes den til at være 25 procent i Nederlandene og Norge og 30 procent i Finland. 
However, the rate of co-funding varies from one country to the next, and is for example estimated to amount to 25 per cent in the Netherlands and Norway and 30 per cent in Finland.
I Danmark forventes med- finansieringsgraden at være cirka 50 procent for etablering og implementering af nye forskningsinfrastrukturer, det vil sige, at 50 procent af finansieringen typisk dækkes af universiteter og andre forskningsinstitutioner. 
In Denmark, the co-funding rate is expected to be approx. 50 per cent for establishment and implementation of new research infrastructures, meaning that 50 per cent of the financing is typically covered by the universities and other research institutions.
Det er forventningen, at universiteter og forskningsinstitutioner helt dækker den efterfølgende drift af forskningsinfrastrukturer i Danmark. 
The expectation is that universities and research institutions carry the entirety of the ensuing costs of operating research infrastructures in Denmark.
Medfinansie- ringsgraden er vigtig i forhold til at danne sig et indtryk af de samlede investeringer i forskningsinfrastrukturer på roadmappen, og den danske investeringspolitik sigter mod at tilvejebringe en højere grad af medfinansiering end mange af de øvrige lande. 
The co-funding rate is a key factor when seeking to form an impression of total investments in research infrastructures on a national roadmap, and the Danish investment policy aims to achieve a higher rate of co-funding than many of the other countries.
Ræsonnementet for dette er, at medfinansiering og ansvar for drift af forskningsinfrastrukturerne er med til at styrke indlejringen og forankringen af forskningsinfrastrukturerne på de forskningsinstitutioner, som anvender dem. 
The rationale for this is that co-funding and responsibility for operating the research
De nuværende danske centrale midler til finansiering af denne roadmaps katalog med forslag rækker ikke til finansiering af alle forslag, og Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet har derfor fokus på tilvejebringelsen af midler til området. 
The current Danish governmental funds for financing of the present Roadmap's catalogue of proposals are not sufficient to finance all proposals, which is why the Ministry is focused on procuring funding for this purpose.
Men en direkte statslig finansiering kan og skal ikke stå alene. 
However, direct governmental financing cannot and should not stand alone.
Det er vigtigt for ministeriet, at investeringerne sker med udpræget grad af medfinansiering og med tilsagn om overtagelse af driftsudgifterne, når forskningsinfrastrukturerne er etablerede med henblik på at understøtte indlejring og ejerskab. 
It is important to the Ministry that investments are conditional on substantial co-funding and with a formal agreement to assume responsibility for the operating expenses once the research infrastructures have been established, with a view to instilling ownership and embed them institutionally.
Ministeriet vil desuden gå i dialog med de forskningsfinansierende fonde om (sam)finansiering af forslag i kataloget. 
The Ministry will also be engaging in dialogue with foundations mandated to fund research on (co)financing of proposals in the catalogue.
Der er investeret i minimum 15 af katalogets forslag til nye forskningsinfrastrukturer ved offentlige og/eller private midler. 
Investments have been made in at least 15 of the catalogue's proposals for new research infrastructures from public-sector and/or private-sector sources.
Investeringerne skal være værdiskabende 
The investments must be value adding
Det er afgørende for Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet at bidrage til, at de offentlige investeringer i forskningsinfrastruktur også kommer dansk erhvervsliv til gode, for hermed at realisere den fulde samfundsøkonomiske gevinst. 
It is imperative for the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science to help to ensure that public-sector investments in research infrastructure also benefit Danish industry in order to realise the full socioeconomic benefit.
Det betyder, at ministeriet vil sætte fokus på det offentlige-private samarbejde og på omsætteligheden og nyttiggørelsen af forskningsinfrastruktur for innovation og vækst. 
This means that the Ministry will direct focus at public- private partnerships and on the transferability and utilisation of research infrastructure for innovation and growth.
Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet vil arbejde for en styrkelse af både ”upstream” og ”downstream”-potentialerne for innovation og vækst. 
The Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science will seek to extend both upstream and downstream potentials for innovation and growth.
”Upstream” ønsker ministeriet at opretholde og udvikle den nuværende danske erhvervs- fremmeindsats for større internationale ”big science”-forskningsinfrastrukturer. 
Upstream, the Ministry will seek to sustain and advance the current Danish industry programme to promote investment in international big science research infrastructures.
En del af medlemsbidragene til de internationale ”big science”-forskningsinfrastrukturer anvendes til at udbyde internationale industrikontakter, som blandt andet virksomheder i medlemslandene har mulighed for at byde ind på. 
A proportion of the membership contributions to the international big science research infrastructures is channelled into public procurements for international industrial contracts, which companies in the member states are eligible to bid for.
Derved kan medlemslandene få en del af deres medlemsbidrag retur i form af industrikontrakter, også kaldet den industrielle returværdi. 
In this way, the member states can recoup their membership 'dues' in the shape of industrial contracts, also known as “industrial returns”.
Udbuddene gælder både meget videnskabelige og højteknologiske leverancer men også mange flere konventi0nelle leverancer. 
The procurements involve both highly scientific and high-tech deliverables, but also many more conventional deliverables.
Der er derfor væsentlige returmidler i spil til hjemtag for danske aktører. 
There are consequently substantial returns in play for Danish stakeholders to claim.
TEKSTBOKS 3.8: BIGSCIENCE.DK 
TEXT BOX 3.8: BIGSCIENCE.DK
Danmark etablerede i 2010 BigScience.dk som et dansk knudepunkt for fremme af dansk erhvervslivs udbytte af større internationale forskningsinfrastrukturer. 
In 2010, Denmark set up BigScience.dk as a Danish node for the promotion of Danish downstream returns from large international research infrastructures.
BigSci- ence.dk drives af Big Science Sekretariatet (BSS). 
BigScience.dk is run by the Big Science Secretariat (BSS).
BigScience.dk varetager rollen som Industrial Liaison Officer (ILO) for forskningsinfrastrukturerne og støtter dermed danske virksomheder gennem blandt andet information, virksomhedsservice, matchmaking og netværksaktiviteter. 
BigScience.dk acts as Industrial Liaison Officer (ILO) for the research infrastructures and in this way supports Danish industry with information, business services, matchmaking and network activities.
Over 150 danske virksomheder har registreret sig i BigScience.dk ’s netværk. 
More than 150 Danish businesses have registered with the BigScience.dk network.
BigScience.dk drives af Teknologisk Institut og Danmarks Tekniske Universitet og finansieres af Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet med støtte fra Vækstforum Hovedstaden og Den Europæiske Fond for Regionaludvikling. 
BigScience.dk is a joint initiative run by the Danish Technological Institute and the Technical University of Denmark and is funded by the Ministry of Higher Education and Science with additional support from the Capital Region of Denmark's Growth Forum and the European Regional Development Fund.
Ministeriets ambition er at fortsætte og udvikle BigScience.dk og Big Science Sekretariatet (BSS) som det danske knudepunkt for at øge den danske returværdi. 
The Ministry's ambition is to continue to develop BigScience.dk and the Big Science Secretariat (BSS) as the Danish anchor for promoting Danish downstream returns.
BigScience.dk anslår, at det internationale ”big science”-marked har en årlig værdi i størrelsesordenen af 270 milliarder kroner med en dansk markedsandel på 300 millioner kroner. 
BigScience.dk estimates that the international big science market is worth an annual approx.
Samtidig vil ministeriet gå i tættere dialog med BigScience.dk for at drøfte yderligere sy- nergimuligheder mellem ministeriets arbejde med repræsentation og tilsyn med de danske med- lemskaber og den danske returværdi. 
The Ministry will also be pursuing closer dialogue with BigScience.dk on realising further synergistic potentials between the Ministry's representation and supervision of Danish memberships and Danish downstream returns.
Hvad angår ”downstream”-fasen vil ministeriet koncentrere sig om de nye offentlige investeringer i nationale forskningsinfrastrukturer i roadmappens katalog og en understøttelse af, at investeringerne bidrager til dansk innovation og vækst. 
As regards the downstream phase, the Ministry will be concentrating on the new public investments in national research infrastructures in the Roadmap's catalogue and supporting such investments in driving Danish innovation and growth.
Det betyder, at hver ny forskningsinfrastruktur, der realiseres fra kataloget af midler fra Puljen fra Forskningsinfrastruktur, skal udfærdige et koncept for erhvervssamarbejde med konkrete målepunkter. 
This means that every new research infrastructure realised from the catalogue by means of funds from the National Fund for Research Infrastructure will be required to submit a concept for industrial partnering with specific benchmarks.
Dette medfører blandt andet, at der skal angives en klar plan for engagement og inddragelse af virksomheder, andre eksterne interessenter samt GTS-institutter og innovationsnetværk i forslagets projektorganisering og konsortium, hvor dette måtte være relevant. 
This will include setting out an explicit plan for engagement and involvement of enterprises, other external stakeholders and approved technological institutions (GTS) and innovation networks in the proposal's project organisation and consortium where applicable.
Der skal formuleres klare principper for industriadgang til forskningsinfrastrukturen eller data genereret fra forskningsinfrastrukturen. 
Well-defined policies must be laid down for industrial access to the research infrastructure or the data it generates.
Dette skal naturligvis ske under hensyntagen til de gældende regler for statsstøtte, hvorefter hvis mere end 20 procent af kapaciteten af forskningsinfrastrukturen tænkes udbudt til private virksomheder (for eksempel ved kontraktforskning, levering af forskningstjenester eller udlejning til virksomheder), skal etableringen af forskningsinfrastrukturen kunne realiseres ved mindst 50 procent medfinansiering fra private virksomheder. 
This must naturally take account of the applicable State Aid rules which stipulate that if more than 20 per cent of the capacity of a research infrastructure is intended to be put out to tender to private-sector enterprises (for example by means of contract research, supply of research services or leasing to businesses), then creation of the research infrastructure in the first place must be at least 50 per cent co-financed by private- sector enterprises.