natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bilag 4: Tidsplan for implementeringen 41 
Appendix 4: Time schedule for implementation 41
Opsummering af Open Access Udvalgets anbefalinger 
Summary of the Open Access Committee’s recommendations
Dansk forskning er meget international. 
Danish research is global.
Den videnskabelige kvalitet af dansk forskning ligger højt internationalt målt ved bl.a. publiceringer, og Videnskabsministeriet har dokumenteret en positiv udvikling de seneste år. 
The scientific quality of Danish research is at a high level internationally measured e.g. by publications, and the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation has documented a positive development in recent years.
Tal fra Videnskabsministeriet viser, at forskningen i forskellige lande globaliseres med forskellig hastighed. 
Figures from the Ministry of Science show that research in different countries is being globalised at different speeds.
I 1980’erne var Danmark det 10. mest internationaliserede land målt på forskningssamarbejde. 
In the 1980s, Denmark was the 10th most internationalised country in terms of research collaboration.
I dag ligger vi på en 5. plads. 
Today, we are in the 5th place.
Den rette implementering af Open Access er afgørende for, at denne udvikling kan forsætte. 
The right implementation of Open Access is decisive for the continuation of this development.
Det er vist, at forskere, hvis forskningsresultater publiceres i Open Access, opnår flere citatio- ner, end de der ikke publiceres i Open Access. 
It has been shown that researchers whose research results are published in Open Access achieve more citations than those who are not published in Open Access.
Ligesom den videnspredning, der kan foregå, er afgørende. 
Likewise, the knowledge dissemination that can take place is decisive.
Implementeringen af Open Access omhandler maksimering af forskningseffekten. 
The implementation of Open Access is about maximization of the research effect.
Gevinsterne for danske virksomheder, dansk forskning og det danske samfund med fri adgang til forskningsresultater er mange. 
Danish companies, Danish research and the Danish society will benefit greatly from Open Access to research results.
Open Access vil resultere i en forbedret forskningsformidling til gavn for forskere, forskningsinstitutioner og virksomheder. 
Open Access will result in improved research dissemination for the benefit of researchers, research institutions and businesses.
Det vil medføre nye og forbedrede forskningsmuligheder, større synlighed for danske forskere, forskning og forskningsinstitutioner nationalt såvel som globalt, bedre adgang til viden for små og mellemstore virksomheder og med det et større potentiale for vækst og innovation. 
This will lead to new and improved research opportunities, greater visibility for danish researchers, research and research institutions nationally as well as globally, better access to knowledge for small and medium-sized companies and thus a potential for growth and innovation.
Formålet med en national Open Access-strategi er at fjerne barrierer for fri adgang til danske forskningspublikationer på kort og lang sigt. 
The purpose of a national Open Access strategy is to remove barriers to free access to Danish research publications in the short and long term.
Således vil man bedst muligt kunne udbrede og formidle offentligt finansierede videnskabelige forskningsresultater til danske og udenlandske forskere samt til danske virksomheder. 
This will be the best way of spreading and disseminating publicly funded scientific research results to Danish and foreign researchers and Danish companies.
Herigennem kan vi udnytte gevinsterne ved Open Access optimalt til støtte for dansk forskning og innovation. 
Thereby, we will be able to exploit the benefits of Open Access optimally, which will support Danish research and innovation.
En national Open Access-strategi vil dermed kunne bidrage væsentligt til regeringens globaliseringsstrategi og målet om, at Danmark skal være et førende viden- og iværksættersamfund. 
A national Open Access strategy would contribute significantly to the Government's Globalisation Strategy and the objective of Denmark becoming a leading knowledge and entrepreneurial society.
Høringsprocessen af Open Access udvalgets anbefalinger tilkendegav en bred opbakning til princippet om fri adgang til offentligt finansieret forskning. 
The consultation process about the Open Access Committee’s recommendations indicated wide support for the principle of open access to publicly funded research.
Der er et udtrykt ønske om, at forskningsresultater fra et lille land som Danmark bliver så synlige som overhovedet muligt, nationalt såvel som internationalt. 
There is an express desire for research results from a small country such as Denmark to become as visible as at all possible, nationally as well as internationally.
Barrierer for adgangen skal derfor nedbrydes og bidrage til, at Danmark fortsat er en interessant samarbejdspartner internationalt. 
Barriers to access must therefore be broken down, and this would contribute to ensuring that Denmark remains an interesting partner internationally.
Det er Open Access Udvalgets indstilling, at der så vidt muligt bør være fri adgang til resultaterne af offentligt finansieret forskning via grøn Open Access med indbygget kvalitetssikring i form af peer review ved de videnskabelige tidsskrifter. 
It is therefore the recommendation of the Open Access Committee that as far as possible there should be Open Access to the results of publicly funded research via green Open Access with built-in quality assurance in the form of peer review by the scientific journals.
Dette betyder, at forskningsartikler efter en peer review-proces i det eksisterende tidsskriftssystem parallelpubliceres i et institutionelt eller emnespecifikt repositorium, hvortil der vil være fri adgang. 
This means that research articles, after a peer review process in the existing journal system, will be published in parallel in an institutional or subject- specific repository, to which there will be open access.
Denne parallelpubli- cering kan eventuelt udmøntes med en begrænset karenstid, hvor artiklerne udelukkende vil være tilgængelige i tidsskrifterne. 
This parallel publishing could be put into practice with a limited deferred period, during which the articles would solely be accessible in the journals.
Det er tillige udvalgets indstilling, at Open Access ikke må stille sig hindrende i vejen for, at resultater fra dansk forskning offentliggøres i de mest anerkendte tidsskrifter. 
The Committee also recommends that Open Access should not present a hindrance to results from Danish research being published in the most reputable journals.
Samtidig har Open Access Udvalget i anbefalingerne peget på, at der skal etableres bæredygtige modeller for fortsat forsknings- publicering på dansk. 
In its recommendations, the Open Access Committee has pointed out that new sustainable models for continued research publication in Danish must be established.
Open Access Udvalget lægger endvidere vægt på at sondre mellem perspektiverne på tidsskriftområdet og på bogområdet. 
The Committee also stresses the need to distinguish between the perspectives for the journal field and the book field, respectively.
Her tænkes særligt på de vilkår og muligheder, der gør sig gældende for de dansksprogede monografier. 
Here, the specific issue is the conditions and possibilities that apply to monographs in Danish.
Følgelig bør disse gøres til genstand for en selvstændig fokuseret analyse og overvejelse. 
These should be made the object of independently focused analysis and consideration.
Udvalget har udarbejdet anbefalinger, som knytter sig til både gylden og grøn Open Access. 
The Committee has prepared recommendations related to both golden and green Open Access.
Udvalget har modtaget oplysninger fra Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsens bibliometriske forskningsindikator med henblik på at belyse mulighederne for at give grøn Open Access til danskproducerede tidsskrifter. 
The Committee has received information from the Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation's biometric research indicator with a view to clarifying the possibilities of giving green Open Access to Danish articles.
Statistikken viser, at 42% af de videnskabelige artikler, som har opnået point i indikatoren i 2010, kan gøres frit tilgængelige via grøn Open Access. 
Statistics show that 42 % of the scientific articles that have achieved points in the indicator in 2010 can be made freely available via green Open Access.
Det er udvalgets vurdering, at grøn Open Access er klart den mest farbare vej, hvilket også afspejles i udvalgets anbefalinger. 
It is the Committee's assessment that green Open Access is clearly the most appropriate way ahead, and this is reflected in the Committee's recommendations.
Anbefaling 1. 
Recommendation 1.
Videnskabsministeriet etablerer national Open Access-politik 
The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation establishes an Open Access policy
Udgangspunktet er, at der så vidt muligt skal være fri adgang til resultaterne af offentligt finansieret forskning. 
The point of departure is that there should be Open Access to the results of publicly funded research to as great an extent as possible.
Anbefaling 2. 
Recommendation 2.
Forskningsråd og fonde etablerer Open Access-politikker 
Research councils and foundations establish Open Access policies
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at alle forskningsråd og offentlige fonde implementerer Open Access-politikker, der lever op til den nationale Open Access-politik. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that all research councils and public foundations implement Open Access policies that comply with the national Open Access policy.
Anbefaling 3. 
Recommendation 3.
Universiteter og andre forskningsinstitutioner implementerer og fremmer Open Access-politikker 
Universities and other research institutions implement and promote Open Access policies
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at alle universiteter og forskningsinstitutioner løbende arbejder med at implementere og fremme Open Access-politikker, der lever op til den nationale Open Access- politik. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that all universities and research institutions continually work to implement and promote Open Access policies that comply with the national Open Access policy.
Anbefaling 4. 
Recommendation 4.
Undersøgelse gennemføres af mulighederne for koordinering mellem den bibliometriske forskningsindikator og Open Access-politikkerne 
Survey of the possibilities of coordination between the bibliometric research indicator and the Open Access policies
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at det i regi af Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen (FI) og Danmarks Elektroniske Fag- og Forskningsbibliotek (DEFF) undersøges, om der eventuelt kan opnås samspil mellem den bibliometriske forskningsindikator og Open Access. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that a study be carried out under the auspices of the Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation and Denmark's Electronic Research Library (DEFF), which is to find out whether it would be possible to achieve interplay between the bibliometric research indicator and Open Access.
Anbefaling 5. 
Recommendation 5.
Én samlet national forskningsdatabase 
One common national research database
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i offentlige forskningsbevillinger henstilles, at al dansk offentligt finansieret forskning bliver tilgængelig i forskningsinstitutionernes forskningsdatabaser og/eller via en samlet forskningsportal baseret på Den Danske Forskningsdatabase i samarbejde med FI og DEFF, som kan formidle de samlede forskningsresultater med klar angivelse/kreditering af det udførende universitet/forskningsinstitution. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that public research grants should recommend that all Danish publicly funded research be made available in the research institutions' research databases and/or via a common research portal based on the Danish National Research Database in collaboration with the Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation and DEFF, which can disseminate the collective research results with clear indication/crediting of the performing university/ research institution.
Anbefaling 6. 
Recommendation 6.
Undersøgelse af behovet for ét repositorium til små forskningsinstitutioners forskningspublikationer 
Survey of the need for one repository for small research institutions' research publications
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der laves en undersøgelse af små forskningsinstitutioners behov for fælles repositorium. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that a survey be made of small research institutions' need for a common repository.
Anbefaling 7. 
Recommendation 7.
Danske videnskabelige forlag, videnskabelige selskaber og videnskabsredak- tører udarbejder oplæg om omstilling til Open Access for videnskabelige tidsskrifter 
Danish scientific publishers, scientific associations and science editors prepare discussion paper on scientific journals' transition to Open Access
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at danske videnskabelige forlag, danske videnskabelige foreninger og videnskabsredaktører opfordres til at udarbejde forslag til, hvordan danske tidsskrifter kan omstilles til Open Access. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that Danish scientific publishers, Danish scientific associations and science editors be encouraged to prepare proposals on how Danish journals can make the transition to Open Access.
Anbefaling 8. 
Recommendation 8.
Danske videnskabelige forlag og videnskabelige selskaber udarbejder oplæg om omstilling til Open Access for videnskabelige monografier 
Danish scientific publishers and scientific associations prepare discussion paper on scientific monographs' transition to Open Access
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at danske videnskabelige forlag og danske videnskabelige foreninger opfordres til at udarbejde forslag til, hvordan danske monografier kan omstilles til Open Access. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that Danish scientific publishers and Danish scientific associations be encouraged to prepare proposals on how Danish monographs can make the transition to Open Access.
Anbefaling 9. 
Recommendation 9.
Open Access Udvalget overvåger implementeringen af videnskabsministerens Open Access-strategi 
The Open Access Committee monitors the implementation of the Minister of Science's Open Access strategy
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at udvalget sekretariatsbetjenes af DEFF og overvåger og koordinerer implementeringen af videnskabsministerens Open Access-strategi i en projektperiode på fire år. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that the Committee be given secretariat assistance from DEFF, and that it monitor and coordinate the implementation of the Minister of Science's Open Access strategy for a project period of four years.
Hertil hører også DEFFs faglige rolle som national støtte for forskningsinstitutionernes lokale rådgivere (kompetenceudvikling, videndeling, internationalt samarbejde mv.). 
This also includes DEFF's professional role as a national support to the research institutions' local advisors (competency development, knowledge sharing, international collaboration etc.).
Der skal laves en årlig afrapportering til Videnskabsministeriet og Kulturministeriet. 
An annual report should be submitted to the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation and to the Ministry of Culture.
Anbefaling 10. 
Recommendation 10.
Styrke og understøtte information, debat og dialog 
Strengthen and support information, debate and dialogue
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i forbindelse med koordinering af implementeringen af Open Access Udvalgets anbefalinger gennemføres en informationskampagne omkring Open Access målrettet forskermiljøer i form af f.eks. informationsmateriale og konferencer. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that in connection with the coordination of the implementation of the Open Access Committee's recommendations an information campaign be carried out about Open Access, targeted at research environments in the form of e.g. information material and conferences.
Anbefaling 11. 
Recommendation 11.
Koordinering af den danske Open Access-indsats i internationale fora udføres 
Coordination of the Danish Open Access initiative in international forums
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at forskningsrådenes danske repræsentanter i internationale forskningsfora såsom EUROHORCs og European Science Foundation sikrer koordinering af de internationale Open Access-politikker rådene imellem. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that the research councils' Danish representatives in international research forums such as EUROHORCs and European Science Foundation ensure coordination of the international Open Access policies among the councils.
Anbefaling 12. DEFF øger fokus på Open Access i DEFF konsortielicenser 
Recommendation 12.
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i DEFFs licensarbejde og i de internationale samarbejder, hvori DEFF indgår, sættes fokus på forhandling af forfatterafgifter i forbindelse med gylden Open Access, frihed til grøn Open Access og transparente forretningsmodeller for Open Access-publicering mod betaling. 
DEFF increases focus on Open Access in DEFF consortium licenses The Open Access Committee recommends that in DEFF's work with licences and in the international partnerships in which DEFF takes part, focus be directed at negotiation of authors' royalties in connection with golden Open Access, freedom to green Open Access, and transparent business models for Open Access publishing at a fee.
Det anbefales, at DEFF forpligter sig til at arbejde aktivt på dette område og tillige forsøger at forhandle aftaler om Open Access-publicering på nationalt plan. 
It is recommended that DEFF commits to working actively with this issue and aims to negotiate deals about Open Access publishing at a national level.
Anbefaling 13. 
Recommendation 13.
Dansk medlemskab af centrale samarbejdsfora for repositorier og interoperabilitet 
Danish membership of central collaboration forums for repositories and interoperability
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at dansk medlemskab af centrale samarbejdsfora sikres. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that Danish membership of central collaboration forums be ensured.
For eksempel at der efter DRIVERs ophør fortsat støttes op omkring det internationale samarbejde gennem medlemskab af Confederation of Open Access Repositories (COAR). 
For example, that after the cessation of DRIVER, support for international collaboration continues through membership of Confederation of Open Access Repositories (COAR).
Anbefaling 14. 
Recommendation 14.
Dækkende langtidsbevaringstjeneste for videnskabelige publikationer etableres 
Establishment of a comprehensive long-term preservation service for scientific publications
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der etableres en langtidsbevaringstjeneste, der sikrer, at digitale publikationer kan læses og udnyttes over lang tid. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that a long-term preservation service be established, which will ensure that digital publications can be read and utilised for a long time.
Anbefaling 15. 
Recommendation 15.
National planlægning af fri adgang til samt langtidsbevaring af primære forskningsdata foretages 
National planning of open access to and long-term preservation of primary research data
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der etableres et tværgående samarbejde, der samler interessenter inden for området primære forskningsdata. 
The Open Access Committee recommends that interdisciplinary collaboration be established, which will gather stakeholders within the field of primary research data.
Dette samarbejde skal planlægge, hvordan danske forskningsdata kan arkiveres, således at man sikrer nutidig og fremtidig adgang. 
This collaboration will plan how Danish research data can be archived in order to ensure present and future access.
I planlægningen skal der redegøres for de økonomiske konsekvenser. 
The planning must account for financial consequences.
Anbefaling 16. 
Recommendation 16.
Herved sikres dansk udnyttelse af de globale erfaringer og løsninger såvel som den danske indflydelse på disse. 
This will ensure Danish utilisation of global experience and solutions as well as Danish influence on these.
Open Access Udvalget ser frem til det videre arbejde med implementeringen af anbefalingerne. 
The Open Access Committee looks forward to the continued work with the implementation of the recommendations.
Grøn Open Access betyder, at man arkiverer den peer reviewed version af en videnskabelig artikel i et repositorium, hvorefter den er frit tilgængelig for alle. 
Green Open Access means that the peer-reviewed version of a scientific article is archived in a repository, after which it is freely available to everybody.
Gylden Open Access omfatter tidsskrifter, som tilbyder en Open Access publiceringsmodel omfattende hele tidsskriftet eller enkelte artikler. 
Gold Open Access includes journals that offer an Open Access publishing model including the entire journal or individual articles.
I praksis betyder dette, at man ikke betaler abonnement/licens, men derimod betaler for at publicere i tidsskriftet, hvorefter artiklen er frit tilgængelig for alle. 
In practice, this means that you do not pay a subscription/license fee, but instead you pay to publish in the journal, after which the article becomes freely available to everybody.
Open Access Udvalget har udarbejdet anbefalinger, som sikrer fri adgang til resultaterne af offentligt finansieret forskning. 
The Open Access Committee has prepared recommendations that ensure Open Access to the results of publicly funded research.
Udvalget mener, at grøn Open Access klart er den mest farbare vej, idet den nødvendige infrastruktur fuldt ud er til stede i Danmark. 
The Committee believes that green Open Access is the most appropriate path, as the necessary infrastructure is already fully in place in Denmark.
Samtidig tillader mange internationale tidsskrifter allerede den form for parallelpublicering af peer reviewed artikler, som grøn Open Access repræsenterer. 
Furthermore, many international journals already permit the form of parallel publishing of peer-reviewed articles that green Open Access represents.
Gylden Open Access forudsætter i større udstrækning, at forlagene har omlagt deres tidsskrifter til Open Access-forretningsmodellen, og at de samlede omkostninger for Danmark ikke øges herved. 
Golden Open Access presupposes to a higher degree that the publishers have adapted their journals to the Open Access business model and that the overall cost for Denmark is not increased by this.
I dag forsøger visse forlag at tilbyde forfatterne et Open Access-frikøb af den enkelte artikel, samtidig med at institutionen betaler for at abonnere på selvsamme tidsskrift. 
Today, certain publishers seek to offer authors the option of an Open Access buy-out of the individual article, while at the same time the institution pays to subscribe to the very same journal.
Denne form for dobbeltbetaling vurderes som helt urealistisk og uantagelig, hvorfor forlagene må stimuleres til at omlægge til Open Access for en betaling, der ikke overstiger den nuværende. 
This sort of double payment is considered completely unrealistic and unacceptable, and the publishers should be encouraged to adapt to Open Access at a fee that does not exceed the present.
Regeringen har ved videnskabsministeren tiltrådt Ministerrådets konklusioner om videnskabelig information i den digitale tidsalder. 
The Government, represented by the Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, has approved the Council of the European Union's conclusions about scientific information in the digital age.The conclusions deal with:
At styrke de nationale strategier og strukturer for adgang til og formidling af videnskabelig information 
Reinforcing national strategies and structures for access to and dissemination of scientific information.
At styrke koordinationen mellem medlemsstaterne af politikker og praksis med hensyn til adgang og formidling 
Reinforcing coordination between the member states of policies and practice regarding access and dissemination.