natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
At sikre langtidsbevaring af videnskabelig information, herunder publikationer og data samt vise den videnskabelige information i nationale bevaringsstrategier behørig opmærksomhed. 
Ensuring long-term preservation of scientific information, including publications and data, and showing due attention to scientific information in national preservation strategies.
Danmark har dermed forpligtet sig til at sikre, at Ministerrådets konklusioner implementeres i Danmark. 
Thereby, Denmark has committed to ensuring that the Council of the European Union's conclusions are implemented in Denmark.
Med det formål at leve op til konklusionerne har Ministeriet for Videnskab, Teknologi og Udvikling nedsat et Open Access-udvalg og placeret dette under styregruppen for Danmarks Elektroniske Fag- og Forskningsbibliotek (DEFF). 
With the objective of living up to these conclusions, the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation has appointed an Open Access Committee and placed this under the steering committee for Denmark's Electronic Research Library (DEFF).
1 Et repositorium er et arkiv for forskningspublikationer (ofte uden den nødvendige teknik til langtidsbevaring) http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/statistics.php 
1 A repository is an archive for research publications (often without the technology needed for long-term preservation).
3 Council of the European Union; Council conclusions on scientific information in the digital age: access, dissemination and preservation. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/newsWord/en/intm/97236.doc (se også bilag 2) 
3 Council of the European Union; Council conclusions on scientific information in the digital age: access, dissemination and preservation. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/newsWord/en/intm/97236.doc (also see Appendix 2)
Open Access Udvalgets opgaver 
The Open Access Committee's assignments
Open Access Udvalget er nedsat under DEFF-styregruppen med direkte reference til Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen. 
The Open Access Committee has been appointed under the DEFF Steering Committee with direct reference to the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation.
I kommissorietfor det nationale arbejde med Open Access er følgende opgaver angivet for Open Access Udvalget: 
In the mandatefor the national work with Open Access, the following assignments are stated for the Open Access Committee:
At planlægge implementeringen af Ministerrådets konklusioner 
Planning the implementation of the Council of the European Union's conclusions
I forbindelse med planlægningen skal udvalget afklare: 
In connection with the planning, the Committee must clarify:
Hvordan offentligt finansieret forskning gøres offentligt tilgængeligt online 
How publicly funded research can be made publicly available online
Hvilke økonomiske konsekvenser der er forbundet med dette 
The financial consequences associated with this
Hvordan implementeringen sikres opbakning fra danske forskere 
How support for the implementation can be secured from Danish researchers
Hvilken rolle de forskningsfinansierende organer skal have i forbindelse med implementeringen 
Which role the research funding bodies are to have in connection with the implementation
Hvordan der tages højde for afklaring af ophavsretslige spørgsmål 
How to allow for clarification of copyright issues
At gennemføre planlægningen af Ministerrådets konklusioner 
Accomplishing the planning of the Council of the European Union's conclusions
Forberede henvendelse til EU-kommissæren for Forskning og Innovation samt EU-kommissæren for Informationssamfundet og Medierne med en opfordring til, at kommissærerne udarbejder et fælles europæisk udspil til forlagsbranchen om Open Access-publicering. 
Preparing an approach to the EU Commissioner for Research and Innovation and the EU Commissioner for the Information Society and the Media with a request that the commissioners prepare a joint European proposal to the publishing industry about Open Access publishing.
Udvalgets medlemmer 
Members of the Committee
Bo Öhrström, vicedirektør, DEFF, Styrelsen for Bibliotek og Medier (formand) Birte Christensen-Dalsgaard, vicedirektør, Det Kongelige Bibliotek 
Bo Öhrström, Deputy Director, DEFF, Danish Agency for Libraries and Media (Chairman) Birte Christensen-Dalsgaard, Deputy Director, The Royal Library
Niels-Henrik Gylstorff, overbibliotekar, Aalborg Universitet Carsten Riis, dekan, Aarhus Universitet 
Niels-Henrik Gylstorff, Head Librarian, Aalborg University Carsten Riis, Dean, Aarhus University
Morten Rosenmeier, formand for Udvalget til Beskyttelse af Videnskabeligt Arbejde Nikolaj Borg Burmeister, chefkonsulent, Danske Universiteter (observatør) 
Morten Rosenmeier, Chairman of the Committee for the Protection of Scientific Work Nikolaj Borg Burmeister, Chief Consultant, Danish Universities (Observer)
Lise Mikkelsen, specialkonsulent, DEFF, Styrelsen for Bibliotek og Medier (sekretær). 
Lise Mikkelsen, Special Consultant, DEFF, Danish Agency for Libraries and Media (Secretary)
4 Kommissorium for det nationale arbejde med Open Access; 
4 Mandate for the national work with Open Access;
Kilde: http://www.deff.dk/content.aspx?catguid={432C8A5B-1EFC-47A5-8378-0339EAED4267%7d 
Source: http://www.deff.dk/content.aspx?catguid={432C8A5B-1EFC-47A5-8378-0339EAED4267%7d
Open Access Udvalgets fremgangsmåde 
The Open Access Committee's approach
Open Access Udvalget har på baggrund af en række interne arbejdsmøder samt et møde med Forlæggerforeningen i februar 2010 udarbejdet en første version af rapporten Anbefalinger til implementering af Open Access i Danmark – Rapport fra Open Access Udvalget. 
The Open Access Committee has prepared the first version of the report Recommendations for Implementation of Open Access in Denmark – Report from the Open Access Committee based on a number of internal work meetings and a meeting with the Danish Publishers Association in February 2010.
Rapporten blev sendt i bred høring 1. maj 2010. 
The report was sent out for general consultation on 1 May 2010.
Høringsprocessen resulterede i 48 høringssvar og et omfattende materiale til rapporten og den videre proces. 
The consultation process resulted in 42 statements and extensive material for the report and the further process.
Open Access Udvalget har på denne baggrund valgt at producere en revideret, udbygget version af den første rapport som grundlag for det videre arbejde. 
Based on this, the Open Access Committee has chosen to produce a revised, amplified version of the first report as the basis for the continued work.
Samtidig har man udarbejdet et forslag til en national Open Access strategi for Danmark. 
The Committee has also prepared a proposal for a national Open Access strategy for Denmark.
A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in an appropriate standard electronic format is deposited (and thus published) in at least one online repository using suitable technical standards (such as the Open Archive defini- tions) that is supported and maintained by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, inter operability, and long-term archiving.” 
A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in an appropriate standard electronic format is deposited (and thus published) in at least one online repository using suitable technical standards (such as the Open Archive definitions) that is supported and maintained by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable Open Access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.”
Open Access Udvalgets anbefalinger omfatter alle forskningsinstitutioner, som udfører forskning baseret helt eller delvist på offentlige midler, og som i forbindelse med forskningen publicerer videnskabelige publikationer. 
The Open Access Committee's recommendations encompass all research institutions that carry out research based entirely or partially on public funds and which publish scientific publications in connection with the research.
Der er altså ikke kun tale om universiteter, men tillige sektorforskning, regioner m.m. 
Thus, this does not only include universities, but also sector research, regions etc.
Uanset metode betyder Open Access fri adgang til forskningsresultater, en øget synlighed og dermed øgede anvendelsesmuligheder af forskningsresultater – i forhold til det nuværende system, hvor adgangen er begrænset til de organisationer, der har råd til at betale for adgangen. 
Regardless of the method, Open Access means free access to research results, increased visibility and thus possibilities for increased utilisation of research results – in comparison to the present system where access is limited to the organisations that can afford to pay for access.
Derudover kan de økonomiske konsekvenser for implementering af Open Access på et samfundsøkonomisk niveau estimeres. 
Furthermore, the financial consequences of implementation of Open Access at a socio-economic level can be estimated.
Denne rapports konklusion er, at afhængig af investering kan den samlede gevinst for Danmark ved at indføre Open Access globalt være betydelig samtidig med omfattende besparelser i den værdikæde, som producerer videnskabelige artikler. 
This report's conclusion is that depending on investments, the overall benefit for Denmark by introducing Open Access globally will be significant, while at the same time it will result in extensive savings in the value chain that produces scientific articles.
Besparelserne stammer fra mindre tidsforbrug hos forskerne og et mere velfungerende system for forskningskommunikation. 
The savings are derived from less time consumption at the researcher's end and a more efficient system for research communication.
Den samfundsøkonomiske gevinst kommer primært fra, at flere institutioner, virksomheder og borgere får hurtig og bedre adgang til forskningspublikationer. 
The socio-economic benefit is primarily achieved by more institutions, companies and citizens gaining quicker and better access to research publications.
5 Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. 
5 Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities.
Se: http://oa.mpg.de/lang/en-uk/berlin-prozess/berliner-erklarung/ 
See: http://oa.mpg.de/lang/en-uk/berlin-prozess/berliner-erklarung/
6 Costs and benefits of Alternative Publishing Models: Denmark / Professor John Houghton, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne. 
6 Costs and benefits of Alternative Publishing Models: Denmark / Professor John Houghton, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne.
Kilde: http://www.deff.dk/content.aspx?catguid={79A0643A-7E30-417A-A184-18F422A6B86C%7d 
Source: http://www.deff.dk/content.aspx?catguid={432C8A5B-1EFC-47A5-8378-0339EAED4267%7d common formula.
Udvalget har af samme grund afstået fra at komme med et samlet overslag over, hvad overgangen til Open Access økonomisk vil komme til at koste for den enkelte forskningsinstitution. 
For the same reason, the Committee has refrained from giving an overall estimate of the financial cost of the transition to Open Access for the individual research institution.
Open Access Udvalget har valgt at disponere sin rapport som en implementeringsplan, der tager udgangspunkt i Ministerrådets konklusioner: “Council Conclusions on scientific information in the digital age: access, dissemination and preservation” (Bilag 2). 
The Open Access Committee has chosen to organise its report as an implementation plan based on the Council of the European Union's conclusions: “Council Conclusions on scientific information in the digital age: access, dissemination and preservation” (Appendix 2).
Implementeringsplanen består af en række anbefalinger med angivelse af proces, aktører og økonomi. 
The implementation plan consists of a number of recommendations with indication of process, players and finances.
Nogle af anbefalingerne er af politisk og strategisk karakter, mens andre er praksisorienterede og kan bidrage med ny og nødvendig viden omkring etablering og sikring af fri adgang til data og publikationer – også i et langtidsperspektiv. 
Some of the recommendations are of political and strategic character, while others are more practice- orientated and may contribute new and necessary knowledge about the establishment and ensuring of Open Access to data and publications – including in a long-term perspective.
I henhold til kommissoriet vil Open Access Udvalget efterfølgende, i forbindelse med implementering af planen i dens godkendte form, have til opgave at følge implementeringen og sikre fremdriften. 
In accordance with its mandate, the Open Access Committee will subsequently, in connection with the implementation of the plan in its approved form, be charged with monitoring the implementation and ensuring the progress.
Økonomi 
Finances
Open Access Udvalget har beregnet omkostninger til en række anbefalinger, mens der ved andre anbefalinger skal laves et forarbejde, som skal resultere i projektplaner og beregninger af omkostninger. 
The Open Access Committee has calculated the costs of a number of recommendations, while in relation to other recommendations, preparatory work needs to be carried out, which should result in project plans and calculations of costs.
Nedenstående tabel viser de estimerede omkostninger. 
The table below shows estimated costs.
Udvikling af forskningsdatabase 
Development of research database
1.000.000 
1,000,000
Drift og projektstyring af forskningsdatabase 
Operation and project management of research database
Udvikling af langtids- bevaringstjeneste for publikationer 
Development of long-term preservation service for publications
2.000.000 
2,000,000
Drift af langtids- bevaringstjeneste for publikationer 
Operation of long-term preservation service for publications
Samlet koordinering 
Complete coordination
800.000 
800,000
Konsulentbistand og undersøgelser omkring videnskabelig Open Access publicering på dansk 
Consultant assistance and surveys about scientific Open Access publishing in Danish
Oplysning, debat og dialog 
Information, debate and dialogue
500.000 
500,000
200.000 
200,000
100.000 
100,000
Planlægning af fri adgang og langtidsbevaring af data 
Planning of Open Access and long-term preservation of data
1.100.000 
1,100,00
1.100.000 
1,100,000
Medlemskaber 
Memberships
650.000 
650,000
TOTAL 
TOTAL
9.050.000 
9,050,000
5.050.000 
5,050,000
3.650.000 
3,650,000
3.550.000 
3,550,000
TOTAL for alle 4 år 
TOTAL for all 4 years
21.300.000 
21,300,000
Derudover afventer Open Access Udvalget økonomiske beregninger af følgende anbefalinger: 
Additionally, the Open Access Committee awaits financial calculations for the following recommendations:
Undersøgelse af behovet for ét repositorium til små forskningsinstitutioners forskningspublikationer 
Study of the need for one repository for small research institutions' research publications
Danske videnskabelige forlag, videnskabelige selskaber og videnskabsredaktører udarbejder oplæg om omstilling til Open Access for videnskabelige tidsskrifter 
Danish scientific publishers, scientific associations and science editors prepare discussion papers on scientific journals' transition to Open Access
Danske videnskabelige forlag og videnskabelige selskaber udarbejder oplæg om omstilling til Open Access for videnskabelige monografier 
Danish scientific publishers and scientific associations prepare discussion papers on scientific monographs' transition to Open Access
National planlægning af fri adgang til samt langtidsbevaring af primære forskningsdata foretages. 
National planning of Open Access to and long-term preservation of primary research data.
Open Access og kvalitetssikring 
Open Access and quality assurance
Grøn Open Access har fået øget global opmærksomhed de senere år og er en hurtig og kosteffektiv metode til at opnå fri adgang til accepterede og kvalitetssikrede artikler. 
Green Open Access has been paid increased global interest in recent years, and it is a fast and cost- effective method for achieving Open Access to accepted and quality assured articles.
Grøn Open Access er ikke en ændring af peer review, som den foregår i dag, men betyder blot at den peer reviewed version af artiklen arkiveres i institutionens lokale repositorium. 
Green Open Access is not a change of peer review, as it takes place today, it merely means that the peer- reviewed version of an article is archived in the institution's repository.
En anden relevant problemstilling omkring kvalitet er spørgsmålet om, hvilken version af den videnskabelige publikation som skal underlægges krav om Open Access. 
Another relevant issue in relation to quality is the question of which version of a scientific publication should be subject to requirements about Open Access.
I praksis anvendes der forskellige begreber for de versioner, der findes af videnskabelige artikler, fra de sendes til et forlag, og til de ligger i en publiceret version på forlagets hjemmeside. 
In practice, different terms are used for the different versions of scientific articles that are available, from the time they are sent off to a publisher until a version is published on the publisher's website.
Overordnet set kan man opdele versionerne i tre grupper: the submitted work (ikke peer reviewed), the accepted work (peer reviewed) og the published work (peer reviewed og layoutet/publisher version). 
In general, the versions can be divided into three groups: the submitted work (not peer-reviewed), the accepted work (peer- reviewed) and the published work (peer-reviewed and layouted/publisher version).
Et submitted work er en artikel, som er sendt til et forlag mhp. udgivelse, dvs. den er endnu ikke peer reviewed. 
A submitted work is an article that has been forwarded to a publisher with a view to publishing, i.e. it has not yet been peer-reviewed.
The accepted work har gennemgået peer review og er accepteret til udgivelse. 
The accepted work has been through a peer review and has been accepted for publishing.
The published work er tillige den version, som ligger på forlagets hjemmeside. 
The published work is the version that is available at the publisher's website.
Sherpa/Romeo er en tjeneste, som drives af University of Nottingham i samarbejde med 33 partnere. 
Sherpa/Romeo is a service run by the University of Nottingham in collaboration with 33 partners.
Sherpa/Romeo indeholder information om forlags copyright politikker og selv-arkivering og er dermed et meget anvendeligt redskab i arbejdet med at afklare forskellige forlags OA politikker. 
Sherpa/Romeo contains information about publishers' copyright policies and self-archiving, and thus, it is a very useful tool in relation to the work to clarify different publishers' OA policies.
Ifølge Sherpa/Romeo tillader 53 % af de 788 forlag i tjenesten arkivering af den peer reviewed version. 
According to Sherpa/Romeo, 53 % of the 788 publishers in the service permit archiving of the peer-reviewed version.
Grøn Open Access er altså en mulighed, som rigtig mange internationale forlag allerede tillader. 
In other words, green Open Access is an option that many international publishers already permit.
Udfordringen er, at forfatterne skal sikre sig rettighederne: “Because most publishers and journals already give blanket permission for green OA, the burden is on authors to take advantage of the opportunity. 
The challenge is that the authors need to secure the rights: “Because most publishers and journals already give blanket permission for green OA, the burden is on authors to take advantage of the opportunity.
This means that authors may publish in nearly any journal that will accept their work (OA or non-OA) and still provide OA to the peer-reviewed text through an OA repository. 
This means that authors may publish in nearly any journal that will accept their work (OA or non-OA) and still provide OA to the peer-reviewed text through an OA repository.
(Unfortunately, the compatibility of green OA with publishing in most non-OA journals is still one of the best-kept secrets of scholarly publishing.)”. 
(Unfortunately, the compatibility of green OA with publishing in most non-OA journals is still one of the best-kept secrets of scholarly publishing.)”.
Open Access Udvalget ønsker at understrege, at versionen accepted work (peer reviewed) ligger så tæt på the published work (peer reviewed og layoutet/publisher version), at accepted work er en acceptabel løsning i de tilfælde, hvor det ikke er muligt at forhandle forfatterrettigheder til den endelige layoutede version. 
The Open Access Committee wishes to stress that the accepted work (peer-reviewed) version is so close to the published work (peer-reviewed and layouted/publisher version) that accepted work is an acceptable solution in the cases where it is not possible to negotiate author's rights to the final layouted version.
I forbindelse med det kommende arbejde med udarbejdelse af OA politikker må de relevante interessenter diskutere kvalitetssikringen, og der skal tages højde for eventuelle forskelle mellem fagområder. 
In connection with the coming work on the elaboration of OA policies, the relevant stakeholders will have to discuss quality assurance, and they will need to make allowance for any differences between various disciplines.
Danske forskere skal stadigvæk publicere i tidsskrifter som sikrer peer review, og de skal stadigvæk stile efter at publicere i de bedste og mest anerkendte tidsskrifter. 
Danish researchers should continue to publish in journals that ensure peer review, and they should continue to strive to be published in the best and most respected journals.
Men de skal samtidig bibeholde en del af deres copyright, så de får lov til at arkivere den peer reviewed version af deres videnskabelige publikationer i institutionens repositorium. 
However, they should also retain a part of their copyright, so that they are allowed to archive the peer-reviewed version of their scientific publications in the institution's repository.
Adskillige store internationale forlag giver allerede tilladelse til dette, og endnu flere forlag giver tilladelse, hvis forskningen er underlagt et Open Access krav, se f.eks. American Chemical Societyog Wiley-Blackwell. 
Several large international publishers already give their permission for this, and even more publishers give their permission if the research is subject to Open Access requirements, cf. e.g. American Chemical Societyan Wiley-Blackwell.
7 Open Access overview. 
7 Open Access overview.
Peter Suber. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm http://pubs.acs.org/page/4authors/copyright/index.html http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-321170.html 
Peter Suber. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm http://pubs.acs.org/page/4authors/copyright/index.html http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-321170.html
Mulighederne for Open Access til videnskabelige artikler i den bibliometriske forskningsindikator 
The possibilities of Open Access to scientific articles in the bibliometric research indicator
I den bibliometriske forskningsindikator er ca. 350 danske forskere tilknyttet arbejdet med at udvælge de videnskabelige peer reviewed tidsskrifter, som skal kunne udløse point i indikatoren. 
In the bibliometric research indicator, about 350 Danish researchers are associated with the selection of scientific peer-reviewed journals, which should trigger points in the indicator.
Autoritetslisten for tidsskrifter er underopdelt i 67 fagområder og 1 tværvidenskabelig liste. 
The authority list for journals is subdivided into 67 disciplines and 1 interdisciplinary list.
Tidsskrifterne er entydigt placeret i én faggruppe, for at undgå overlap mellem faggruppernes valg af tidsskrifter. 
The journals are unambiguously placed in one subject group in order to avoid overlaps between the subject group's choice of journals.