natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den Internationale Organisation af Øverste Revisionsmyndigheder I 2014 fortsatte vi med at spille en aktiv rolle og deltog fuldt ud i INTOSAI’s aktiviteter og leverede væsentlige bidrag til flere af INTOSAI’s udvalg og arbejdsgrupper: • til INTOSAI’s mål 1 som medlem af udvalget for faglige Standarder og af dettes underudvalg om finansiel og juridisk‐kritisk revision samt forvaltningsrevision • til INTOSAI’s mål 2 som medlem af kapacitetsop‐ bygningsudvalget og af dettes underudvalg om fremme af bedste praksis og kvalitetssikring gennem frivillige peerevalueringer • til INTOSAI’s mål 3 som medlem af vidende‐ lingsudvalget og af dettes arbejdsgrupper om miljørevision og om finansiel modernisering og lovgivningsreform. 
International organisations of public audit institutions We continued to play a full and active part in Intosai activities in 2014 and made important contributions to several of its committees and working groups: • in Intosai’s Goal 1 as a member of the Professional Standards Committee and of its financial, compli‐ ance and performance audit subcommittees; • in Intosai’s Goal 2 as a member of the Capacity Building Committee and its subcommittee on promoting best practices and quality assurance through voluntary peer reviews; and • in Intosai’s Goal 3 as a member of the Knowledge Sharing Committee and its working groups on environmental audit and on financial modernisa‐ tion and regulatory reform.
I juni 2014 deltog vi i EUROSAI’s IX kongres, hvilket omfattede tilrettelæggelse og afholdelse af en works‐ hop om resultatmåling, og i det XLI og XLII bestyrelses‐ møde i EUROSAI (vi har været medlem af bestyrelsen siden 2011). 
We participated in the IX Eurosai Congress in June 2014, including organising and holding a workshop on ‘Meas‐ uring your performance’, and in the XLI and XLII Eurosai governing board meetings (having been a member of the governing board since 2011).
Vi fortsatte vores aktive engagement i EUROSAI’s arbejdsorganer, bl.a. arbejdsgrupperne om informati‐ onsteknologier og om miljørevision, styringsudvalget for oprettelse og drift af den elektroniske database om gode praksis vedrørende revisionskvalitet og taskfor‐ cen om revision og etik. 
We continued our active involvement in Eurosai work‐ ing bodies, notably the working groups on informa‐ tion technologies and on environmental audit, the monitoring committee for setting up and operating the electronic database on good practices on audit qual‐ ity and the task force on audit and ethics.
Revisionsretten blev også med‐ lem af den nylig oprettede arbejdsgruppe om revision af midler afsat til naturkatastrofer og ulykker. 
The ECA also became a member of the newly established working group on the audit of funds allocated to catastrophes and disasters.
Inden for rammerne af de fælles konferencer for INTO‐ SAI’s regionale arbejdsgrupper deltog Revisionsretten aktivt i den II fælles ASOSAI2‐EUROSAI‐konference, som havde fokus på de tidligere erfaringer med vedtagelsen af ISSAI’erne3 og deres fremtidige virkninger. 
In the framework of the joint conferences between Intosai’s regional working groups, the ECA actively participated in the II Asosai2–Eurosai Joint Conference, which focused on the lessons learnt from the past experiences of adopting the ISSAIs3 and their future implications.
1 Pr. januar 2015 omfatter netværket seks kandidatlande (Albanien, Den Tidligere Jugoslaviske Republik Makedonien, Island, Montenegro, Serbien og Tyrkiet) og ét muligt kandidatland (Bosnien‐Hercegovina). 
1 As at January 2015, the Network comprises six candidate countries (Albania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Iceland, Montenegro, Serbia and Turkey) and one potential candidate country (Bosnia and Herzegovina).
Siden november 2013 har Kosovo* deltaget i netværket som observatør. * Denne betegnelse indebærer ingen stillingtagen til Kosovos status, og den er i overensstemmelse med FN’s Sikkerhedsråds resolution 1244 og Den Internationale Domstols udtalelse om Kosovos uafhængighedserklæring. 
Since November 2013 Kosovo* has participated in the Network as observer. * This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.
2 Asian Organisation of Supreme Audit institutions. 
2 Asian Organisation of Supreme Audit institutions.
3 Internationale standarder for de øverste revisionsmyndigheder. 
3 International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions.
Vores aktiviteter 42 Vigtige begivenheder International peerevaluering af Revisionsretten I 2013 bad Revisionsretten de overordnede revisions‐ organer i Frankrig, Tyskland og Sverige om at udføre en peerevaluering af vores praksis i forbindelse med forvaltningsrevision. 
Our activities 42 Significant events International peer review of the ECA In 2013 the ECA invited the SAIs of France, Germany and Sweden to carry out a peer review of our performance audit practice.
Peerevalueringen trak på alle tre partneres erfaringer og var meget nyttig både for Revi‐ sionsretten og for evaluatorerne. 
The peer review drew on the experience of all three partners and was a very useful exercise for both the ECA and the reviewers.
Metodologien bygge‐ de på generelt anerkendte kriterier for OR’ers arbejde og tog retningslinjerne i de internationale standarder i betragtning. 
The methodology was based on generally recognised criteria governing the work of SAIs, and took into account the guidance set out in international standards.
Peerevalueringen blev offentliggjort i 2014 på vores websted (eca.europa.eu). 
The peer review was published in 2014 on our website (http://eca.europa.eu).
Det konkluderedes, at Revi‐ sionsretten havde gjort betydelige fremskridt siden den sidste peerevaluering i 2008. 
In it the peers concluded that since the last peer review of 2008, the ECA had made significant progress.
Vi havde analyseret de udfordringer, der var et resultat af EU’s komplekse institutionelle ramme, og havde taget en række skridt til yderligere at øge effektiviteten og produktiviteten af vores revisioner samt kvaliteten af vores revisionsbe‐ retninger. 
We had analysed the challenges resulting from the EU’s complex institutional framework and had taken a number of steps to further enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of our audits and the quality of our audit reports.
Evalueringen påpegede, at vi havde behov for at strømline og accelerere vores beslutningstagning og for at forbedre formuleringen af de anbefalinger, vi fremsætter i revisionsberetningerne. 
The peers identified the need for us to streamline and speed up our decision making, and to improve the formulation of the recom‐ mendations we make in our audit reports.
Internationale revisionsstandarder tilskynder til pee‐ revalueringer. 
International peer reviews are encouraged by interna‐ tional auditing standards.
De giver de overordnede revisionsorga‐ ner mulighed for at få foretaget en frivillig vurdering af, hvordan de varetager deres opgaver, baseret på internationale standarder. 
They provide an opportunity for supreme audit institutions to obtain a voluntary assessment based on international standards of how they discharge their functions.
I 2014 ledede Revisionsretten peerevalueringen af det overordnede revisionsorgan i Litauen og blev bedt om at evaluere den schweiziske forbundsfinanskontrol samt at deltage i peerevaluerin‐ ger af de overordnede revisionsorganer i Spanien og Letland. 
In 2014, the ECA led the peer review of the supreme audit institution of Lithu‐ ania, and was invited to review the Swiss Federal Audit Office, as well as to take part in peer reviews of the SAIs of Spain and Latvia.
Højniveaukonferencen om forbedring af ansvarligheden i EU Fra venstre til højre: Jacques Sciberras, kabinetschef, Kevin Cardiff, medlem af Revisionsretten, Vítor Caldeira, formand for Revisionsretten, og Olli Rehn, næstformand i Europa‐Parlamentet. 
High‐level conference on improving EU accountability From left to right: Jacques Sciberras, head of private office, ECA Member Kevin Cardiff, President Vítor Caldeira and EP Vice President Olli Rehn.
I oktober 2014 afholdt Revisionsretten en højni‐ veaukonference, der samlede mange af dem, der har til opgave at sikre, at Den Europæiske Union står til ansvar for de offentlige midler, der sættes ind på at opfylde EU’s mål. 
In October 2014, the ECA held a high‐level conference, which brought together many of those concerned with ensuring that the European Union is accountable for public funds put at stake to meet EU objectives.
Konferencens tema var de mangler, overlap‐ ninger og udfordringer, der findes på EU‐ og medlems‐ statsplan, som påpeget i vores horisontale analyse af EU’s ordninger for ansvarlighed og offentlig revision (jf. side 35). 
The conference addressed the gaps, overlaps and chal‐ lenges which exist at EU and Member State level, as identified in our landscape review of EU accountability and public audit arrangements (see page 35).
Konferencen gav deltagerne, herunder medlemmer af eller repræsentanter for Europa‐Parlamentet, Euro‐ pa‐Kommissionen, Revisionsretten, Den Europæiske Centralbank, Den Europæiske Investeringsbank, den europæiske stabilitetsmekanisme, de nationale revisi‐ onskontorer og den akademiske verden, mulighed for at debattere, hvordan disse ordninger burde udvikle sig som reaktion på udviklingen i den økonomiske, bud‐ getmæssige og monetære integration. 
It provided a platform for a debate between the par‐ ticipants, including Members or representatives of the European Parliament, the European Commission, the ECA, the European Central Bank, the European Invest‐ ment Bank, the European Stability Mechanism, national audit offices and academia, on how these arrange‐ ments should develop in response to developments in economic, budgetary and monetary integration.
Drøftelserne var koncentreret om ansvarlighed i EU, navnlig i relation til centralbanker og tilsynsførende, krise‐ og efterkri‐ sestrukturer, EU‐midlernes løftestangseffekt i form af udefrakommende deltagelse og stærkere fokus på EU’s resultater. 
Discussions concentrated on accountability within the EU, in particular in relation to central banks and super‐ visors, crisis and post‐crisis structures, the leveraging of EU funds with outside participation and strengthening the focus on the EU’s performance.
Konferencens deltagere var enige om, at der er behov for større samarbejde mellem statslige myndigheder, parlamenter og revisorer på EU‐plan og nationalt plan med henblik på at give offentligheden et bedre bil‐ lede af, hvordan EU‐politikkerne og ‐programmerne fungerer. 
The conference participants agreed that greater cooperation between governing authorities, parlia‐ ments and auditors at EU and national level is needed to provide the public with a better picture of how EU policies and programmes are performing.
Vores aktiviteter 43 Styrkelse af partnerskaberne med de nationale myndigheder i Litauen En højtstående delegation fra Revisionsretten besøgte Litauen i september for at styrke partnerskaberne med Litauens parlament, regering, centralbank og OR og anbefale, hvordan EU’s udgifter i landet bedst udnyttes og kontrolleres. 
Our activities 43 Strengthening partnerships with national authorities in Lithuania A high‐level delegation from the ECA visited Lithu‐ ania in September to strengthen partnerships with their parliament, government, central bank and SAI, and to promote best use and scrutiny of EU spending in the country.
Revisionsretten og dens litauiske part‐ nere udvekslede synspunkter vedrørende prioriterin‐ gerne med hensyn til at sikre bedre ansvarlighed i EU, undersøgte, hvordan man bedst kunne samarbejde om at give EU‐udgifterne større merværdi og overvejede, hvordan man kunne hjælpe de politiske beslutningsta‐ gere og parlamentet i Litauen med at udnytte resulta‐ terne af Revisionsrettens revisioner bedst muligt. 
The ECA and its partners in Lithuania exchanged views on the priorities for improving EU accountability, explored how best to work together to promote the added value of EU spending, and consid‐ ered how to help policy makers and the parliament in Lithuania to make best use of the ECA’s audit results.
Under besøget deltog Revisionsrettens delegation aktivt i det litauiske parlaments konference om udfor‐ dringer for ansvarlighed og offentlig revision. 
During the visit, the ECA delegation took an active part in the Lithuanian Parliament’s conference on ‘Chal‐ lenges in Accountability and Public Audit’.
Herud‐ over drøftede delegationen og dens partnere emner forbundet med finansiel og økonomisk styring samt Litauens fordele ved at indtræde i euroområdet den 1. januar 2015. 
In addition, the delegation and its partners discussed issues con‐ nected with financial and economic governance and the benefits for Lithuania of entering the euro area on 1 January 2015.
Besøget i Litauen var det første af en række besøg i EU‐medlemsstaterne, som i de kommende år skal styrke Revisionsrettens partnerskaber med de natio‐ nale myndigheder, der er ansvarlige for forvaltning og kontrol af EU‐midler. 
Lithuania was the first in a series of visits to EU Member States, through which the ECA intends in the coming years to strengthen partnerships with national authori‐ ties responsible for the management and scrutiny of EU funds.
Møde mellem Revisionsrettens delegation og Litauens nationale revisionsorgan. 
Meeting between ECA delegation and the National Audit Office of Lithuania.
Vores forvaltning 44 Revisionsrettens kollegium Revisionsrettens kollegium består af et medlem fra hver medlemsstat. 
Our management 44 The ECA College The ECA College comprises one Member per Member State.
I henhold til traktaten har Revisionsret‐ tens medlemmer en mandatperiode på seks år og kan genudnævnes. 
Under the Treaty, ECA Members serve a term of 6 years, and their mandates can be renewed.
Afdelin‐ gerne vedtager revisionsberetninger og udtalelser og træffer afgørelser om bredere spørgsmål af strategisk og administrativ art. 
Cham‐ bers adopt audit reports and opinions and take deci‐ sions on broader strategic and administrative issues.
De enkelte medlemmer er også ansvarlige for deres egne opgaver, som primært vedrø‐ rer revision. 
Each Member also has responsibility for his or her own tasks, which are primarily audit related.
Det underliggende revisionsarbejde udfø‐ res af Revisionsrettens revisorer og koordineres af det ansvarlige medlem med bistand fra dennes kabinet. 
The underlying audit work is carried out by the ECA’s audit staff under the coordination of the Member responsible, who is assisted by a private office.
Medlemmet forelægger beretningen for afdelingen og/ eller Retten i plenum med henblik på vedtagelse og derefter for Europa‐Parlamentet, Rådet og de øvrige relevante interessenter, herunder medierne. 
He or she then presents the report to the chamber and/or full Court for adop‐ tion, and then to the European Parliament, Council and other relevant stakeholders, including the media.
I 2014 udnævnte Rådet for Den Europæiske Union efter indstilling fra medlemsstaterne og efter høring af Euro‐ pa‐Parlamentet seks nye medlemmer af Den Europæ‐ iske Revisionsret. 
In 2014, following nominations from their Member States, and after consultation with the European Parlia‐ ment, the Council of the European Union appointed six new Members to the European Court of Auditors.
Fire af dem — Alex Brenninkmeijer (Nederlandene), Danièle Lamarque (Frankrig), Nikolaos Milionis (Grækenland), Phil Wynn Owen (Det Forenede Kongerige) — tiltrådte Revisionsretten den 1. januar, og de sidste to — Klaus‐Heiner Lehne (Tyskland) og Oskar Herics (Østrig) — den 1. marts 2014. 
Four of them — Alex Brenninkmeijer (Netherlands), Danièle Lamarque (France), Nikolaos Milionis (Greece) and Phil Wynn Owen (United Kingdom) — joined the ECA on 1 January, and a further two — Klaus‐Heiner Lehne (Germany) and Oskar Herics (Austria) — joined on 1 March 2014.
Den 23. januar 2014 genvalgte Revisionsrettens 28 medlemmer Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira som formand for en tredje treårig periode. 
On 23 January 2014 the 28 Members of the ECA re‐elected Vítor Caldeira as its President for a third 3‐year term.
Formanden overvåger udførelsen af Revisionsrettens arbejde og repræsenterer institutionen udadtil. 
The president supervises the performance of the ECA’s work and represents the institution in its external relations.
Revisionsrettens medlemmer ved udgangen af 2014. 
ECA Members at the end of 2014.
Revisionsrettens medlemmers 1000. møde, den 27. oktober 2014. 
The 1000th meeting of the ECA Members on 27 October 2014.
Vores forvaltning 45 Afdelingsformand Rasa BUDBERGYTĖ Litauen Afdelingsformand Henri GRETHEN Luxembourg Afdelingsformand Karel PINXTEN Belgien Jan KINŠT Den Tjekkiske Republik Kersti KALJULAID Estland Augustyn KUBIK Polen Kevin CARDIFF Irland Nikolaos MILIONIS Grækenland Oskar HERICS Østrig DEN EUROPÆISKE REVISIONSRET 31. december 2014 Formand Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Portugal Afdeling I — Beskyttelse og forvaltning af naturressourcer Afdeling II — Strukturpolitikker, transport og energi Ladislav BALKO Slovakiet Iliana IVANOVA Bulgarien George PUFAN Rumænien Phil WYNN OWEN Det Forenede Kongerige Afdeling III — Foranstaltninger udadtil Klaus-Heiner FAZAKAS WESSBERG LAMARQUE LEHNE Hans Gustaf Danièle Ungarn Sverige Frankrig Tyskland Szabolcs Afdeling IV — Indtægter, forskning og interne politikker samt EU-institutioner og -organer Afdelingsformand Afdelingsformand Milan Martin CVIKL Slovenien Louis GALEA Malta Pietro RUSSO Italien Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA Spanien Neven MATES Kroatien Alex BRENNINKMEIJER Nederlandene CEAD-Afdelingen — Koordinering, evaluering, revisionserklæring og udvikling Afdelingsformand MIR — Medlem med ansvar for institutionelle forbindelser Ville ITÄLÄ Finland Afdelingsformand Igors LUDBORŽS Letland Lazaros S. LAZAROU Cypern Henrik OTBO ( † 1/2/2015) Danmark 
Our management 45 Milan Martin CVIKL Slovenia Louis GALEA Malta Pietro RUSSO Italy Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA Spain Neven MATES Croatia Alex BRENNINKMEIJER Netherlands Dean EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 31 December 2014 President Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Portugal Chamber I — Preservation and management of natural resources Dean Rasa BUDBERGYTĖ Lithuania Henri GRETHEN Luxembourg Dean Karel PINXTEN Belgium Chamber IV — Revenue, research and internal policies, and European Union’s institutions and bodies Dean Jan KINŠT Czech Republic Ladislav BALKO Slovakia Szabolcs FAZAKAS Hungary Kersti KALJULAID Estonia Augustyn KUBIK Poland Kevin CARDIFF Ireland Nikolaos MILIONIS Greece Oskar HERICS Austria Chamber II — Structural policies, transport and energy CEAD Chamber — Coordination, evaluation, assurance and development Dean MIR — Member for institutional relations Ville ITÄLÄ Finland Igors LUDBORŽS Latvia Lazaros S. LAZAROU Cyprus Henrik OTBO († 1/2/2015) Denmark Iliana IVANOVA Bulgaria George PUFAN Romania Phil WYNN OWEN United Kingdom Klaus-Heiner LEHNE Germany Chamber Ill — External actions Hans Gustaf WESSBERG Sweden Danièle LAMARQUE France
Vores forvaltning 46 Revisionsrettens strategi for 2013-2017: de fremskridt, der er gjort I 2014 var Revisionsretten på andet år i gang med at gennemføre sin strategi for perioden 2013‐2017. 
Our management 46 ECA strategy for 2013–17: progress made In 2014, the ECA was in the second year of implementing its strategy covering the 2013–17 period.
Målet i pe‐ rioden er at maksimere værdien af vores bidrag til den offentlige ansvarlighed i EU. 
The objective during the period is to maximise the value of our contribution to EU public accountability.
For at kunne opfylde dette mål er vore vigtigste prioriteter: ο at koncentrere Revisionsrettens produkter om at forbedre ansvarligheden i EU ο at samarbejde med andre for at styrke Revisionsrettens bidrag til ansvarligheden i EU ο at videreudvikle Revisionsretten som en professionel revisionsinstitution ο at gøre bedst mulig brug af Revisionsrettens viden, færdigheder og ekspertise ο at demonstrere Revisionsrettens performance og ansvarlighed. 
To meet this object‐ ive, the main priorities are to: ο focus the ECA’s products on improving EU accountability; ο work with others to leverage the ECA’s contribution to EU accountability; ο develop the ECA further as a professional audit institution; ο make best use of the ECA’s knowledge, skills and expertise; ο demonstrate the ECA’s performance and accountability.
I 2014 hjalp strategien os med at komme i gang med en væsentlig omlægning af den måde, vi er organiseret på. 
In 2014 the strategy helped start significant change in the way we are organised.
To interne arbejdsgrupper om strømlining af revisionsprocessen og bedre definition af funktioner og ansvar fremlagde deres resultater. 
Two internal strategy working groups on streamlining the audit process and on better defining roles and responsibilities presented their re‐ sults.
Dette faldt sammen med rapporten fra Europa‐Parlamentet om Revisionsrettens fremtid og fremlæggelsen af resultaterne af Revisionsrettens peerevaluering. 
This coincided with the report by the European Parliament on the future of the ECA and the presentation of the results of the ECA’s peer review.
Gennemførelsen af de forskellige anbefalinger blev konsolideret i et stort reformprojekt, der blev igangsat sidst i 2014 og vil fortsætte indtil midten af 2016. 
The implementation of the various recommendations was consolidated into a major reform project that was started in late 2014 and will continue until mid 2016.
For det første at strømline revisionsprocessen. 
Firstly, to streamline the audit process.
For særberetningernes vedkommende skal dette medføre en kortere produktionstid, og for årsberetningens vedkommende skal det skabe større fokus og ressourcebesparelser. 
For special reports this should lead to shorter production times, and for the annual report it intends to bring greater focus and resource savings.
Det andet mål er at omdanne Revisionsret‐ ten til opgavebaseret organisation. 
The second aim is to transform the ECA into a task‐based organisation.
Dermed vil vores institution blive bedre i stand til at dirigere ressourcerne hen til de revisioner og gennemgange, der giver mest merværdifor EU’s borgere. 
This will make our institution more able to direct resources to audits and reviews that add most value in serving the citizens of the EU.
Vores forvaltning 47 Måling af Revisionsrettens resultater Siden 2008 har Revisionsretten anvendt nøgleresultatindikatorer (KPI’er) til at holde ledelsen orienteret om de fremskridt, der er sket hen imod opfyldelsen af målene, og til at støtte beslutningstagningen og give interessenterne oplysninger om performance. 
Our management 47 Measuring the ECA’s performance Since 2008 the ECA has applied key performance indi‐ cators (KPIs) to inform management of progress to‐ wards achieving its goals, to support decision‐making and to provide information on performance to our stakeholders.
De af‐ spejler Revisionsrettens prioriteringer og demonstrerer dens performance og ansvarlighed som en professionel revisionsinstitution Indikatorerne skal bruges til at måle centrale elementer i relation til kvaliteten og effekten af Revisionsrettens arbejde, idet der lægges særlig vægt på de vigtigste interessenters synspunkt og på produktiviteten og effektiviteten af Revisionsrettens ressourceanvendel‐ se. 
They reflect our priorities and demon‐ strate our performance and accountability as a profes‐ sional audit institution. The indicators aim to measure key elements of the quality and impact of our work, paying particular at‐ tention to the opinion of key stakeholders, and the efficiency and effectiveness of our use of resources.
KPI’erne er blevet opdateret for strategiperioden 2013‐2017. 
The KPIs have been updated for the 2013–17 strategic period.