natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I juli 2000 blev der foretaget korrektioner for et samlet belżb p 351 mio. EUR for perioden 1996-1999 (2). 
In July 2000 a total of EUR 351 million, covering the period 1996 to 1999, was corrected (2).
Kommissionen indrżmmer, at de sidste korrektioner for 1996 ikke vil blive foretaget hurtigere efter den nye ordning end efter den gamle. 
The Commission accepts that the last corrections for 1996 will not be made any quicker under the new system than under the old.
Efter den gamle ordning ville alle korrektioner for 1996 imidlertid vžre blevet foretaget i 2000 og korrektionerne for 1997 i 2001 osv. 
However, under the old system, all corrections for 1996 would have been made in 2000, corrections for 1997 in 2001, and so on.
Reformen har sledes fremskyndet korrek-tionsprocessen betydeligt. 
The reform has therefore considerably speeded up the correction process.
Mange hundrede millioner euro er blevet opkržvet for Kommissionen hurtigere, end det ville have vžret tilfžldet efter den gamle ordning. 
Several hundred million euro has been recovered for the Community more quickly than would have been the case under the old system.
(1) Beslutning 2000/216/EF (EFT L 67 af 15.3.2000, s. 
(1) Decision 2000/216/EC (OJ L 67, 15.3.2000, p.
(2) Beslutning 2000/449/EF (EFT L 180 af 19.7.2000, s. 
(2) Decision 2000/449/EC (OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p.
Endelig er Kommissionen af den opfattelse, at 1996 er det fżrste r med den ny procedure, og den er overbevist om, at korrektionerne fremover vil blive foretaget hurtigere. 
Finally, the Commission considers that 1996 is the first year of the reformed process and is confident that corrections for future years will be completed more quickly.
FORLIGSPROCEDUREN Baggrund 58. 
THE CONCILIATION PROCEDURE Background 58.
Evalueringsrapporten om forligsproceduren er udarbejdet af Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug. 
The evaluation report on the conciliation procedure was drawn up by the Directorate-General for Agriculture.
Kommissionen er juridisk forpligtet til ikke at finansiere udgifter over EU-midler i de tilfžlde, hvor udgifterne ikke er afholdt i overensstemmelse med fžllesskabsreglerne, og den kan derfor ikke indg kompromiser vedrżrende beregningen af korrektioner, der ikke ville vžre forenelige med denne forpligtelse. 
The Commission is legally obliged to exclude expenditure from Community financing where that expenditure has not been effected in compliance with Community rules, and therefore, cannot accept compromises on the calculation of corrections that would not be compatible with this obligation.
Forslaget om at forhandle sig frem til et forlig kunne derfor ikke accepteres. 
The proposal to settle cases on a ÔtransactionŐ basis was therefore not acceptable.
Kommissionen tillžgger forligsorganets rolle i forbindelse med kvalitetskontrol stor betydning. 
The Commission attaches importance to the role that the Conciliation Body plays in ensuring quality control.
Imidlertid kan Kommissionen kun acceptere forligsorganets konklusion i de tilfžlde, hvor det p grundlag af udvekslingen af argumenter og redegżrelse for faktiske forhold viser sig, at denne konklusion er mere rimelig end det oprindelige forslag fra dens tjenestegrene. 
Nevertheless the Commission can accept the Conciliation BodyŐs conclusion only where it appears that, on the basis of the facts and arguments exchanged, this conclusion is more appropriate than the initial proposal of its services.
For at fremhžve dette aspekt ved forligsorganets rolle har Kommissionen med beslutning 2000/649/EF (3)žndret beslutning 94/442/EF for at lette udnžvnelsen af medlemmer med speciale i moderne revisionsteknikker ved siden af medlemmer med indgende kvalifikationer p EUGFL-omrdet, som det i żjeblikket er tilfžldet. 
To stress this aspect of the role of the Conciliation Body, the Commission has, by Decision 2000/649/EC (OJ L 272, 25.10.2000, p. 41), amended Decision 94/442/EC in order to facilitate the appointment of members specialised in modern audit techniques, in addition to members highly qualified in matters relating to the EAGGF, as it is currently the case.
Med hensyn til forligsorganets mulighed for at foresl en forhżjelse af korrektionerne er dette grundlžggende uforeneligt med iden om forlig. 
As regards the possibility for the Conciliation Body to propose increases of corrections this is basically incompatible with the idea of conciliation.
Vurdering af forligsorganets indsats Firemnedersfristen 64. 
Performance measurement of the Conciliation Body The four-month deadline 64.
Efter Rettens opfattelse har forligsproceduren ikke fremskyndet regnskabsafslutningsproceduren. 
The Court considers that the conciliation process has not speeded up the clearance process.
Kommissionen bemžrker, at de problemer, der er rejst, specielt vedrżrer den gamle metode for regnskabsafslutning, som bestod i at vedtage n beslutning pr. regnskabsr. 
The Commission notes that the problems raised essentially concern the old clearance of accounts method which involved taking a decision for each financial year.
Under den ny ordning er der mulighed for at vedtage flere beslutninger om regnskabsafslutning i lżbet af et enkelt kalenderr. 
In the new system the possibility exists of adopting a number of clearance decisions in one calendar year.
2.3.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 69/29 Fremskyndelsen af afslutningsproceduren er et resultat af reformen i sin helhed, som forligsproceduren ikke kan adskilles fra. 
2.3.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 69/29 The speeding up of the clearance procedure is the result of the reform in general, from which the conciliation procedure cannot be separated.
Procentsatserne i forligsorganets evalueringsrapport m fastholdes, for de tjener blot til at give et indtryk af dets evne til at opn en tilnžrmelse mellem Kommissionens og medlemsstaternes holdning. 
Outcome 66 to 68. ciliation Body must be kept as they serve only to give an indication of its success in bringing the positions of the Commission and the Member States closer together.
De foregriber ikke som sdan den endelige lżsning af tvisterne, blandt andet fordi det kun er medlemsstaterne, der kan anlžgge sag ved Domstolen, og denne ret ikke berżres af forligsproceduren. 
They do not themselves prejudge the final outcome of the disputed cases, in particular because the right to bring an action before the Court of Justice belongs to the Member State concerned and this right is not affected by the conciliation procedure.
EF -Domstolen 71. 
The Court of Justice of the European Communities 71.
Kommissionen hbede naturligvis, at indfżrelsen af forligsproceduren ville medfżre, at der ville blive indbragt fžrre sager for EF-Domstolen, men dette har aldrig vžret et formelt ml med ordningen, da dette ligger uden for Kommissionens kontrol. 
The Commission naturally hoped that the introduction of conciliation would reduce the number of cases referred to the Court of Justice, but this was never a formal objective of the system as it is outside the control of the Commission.
Oprettelsen af forligsorganet opfyldte i realiteten behovet for at styrke medlemsstaternes ret til at forsvare sig og sikre en stżrre benhed i sager, hvor der bliver tale om eventuelle finansielle korrektioner. 
The Conciliation Body was in fact set up to strengthen the Member StatesŐ rights of defence and to make for greater transparency in matters which might ultimately result in financial corrections.
Kommissionen skal minde om, at en medlemsstats indbringelse af sager for EF-Domstolen er en rettighed, der er anerkendt i traktaten. 
The Commission would point out that the Treaty gives Member States the right to bring actions before the Court of Justice.
Kommissionen har ingen indflydelse p medlemsstaternes handlemde i den henseende. 
The Commission is not in a position to affect the actions of the Member States in this regard.
Kommissionen bemžrker, at formlet med regnskabsafslutningsproceduren ikke er at foresl finansielle korrektioner. 
The Commission notes that the objective of the clearance of accounts process is not to propose financial corrections.
Hovedformlet er at kontrollere, om betalingerne har fundet sted i overensstemmelse med reglerne. 
The main objective is to verify whether payments have been made in conformity with the rules.
Kommissionen er af den opfattelse, at overensstemmelsen med reglerne har forbedret sig i kraft af bedre og klarere regler og i kraft af bedre kontrolordninger (som det integrerede administrations-og kontrolsystem IFKS). 
The Commission believes that conformity with the rules has improved, through the development of better and clearer rules and through improvements in control systems (such as IACS).
Kommissionen arbejder sammen med medlemsstaterne p konstant at forbedre anvendelsen af bestemmelserne i den fžlles landbrugspolitik. 
The Commission works with the Member States to constantly improve the implementation of the CAP legislation.
Det er mlet med tiden at reducere korrektionernes stżrrelse og ideelt at n frem til en situation, hvor der ikke lžngere er behov for korrektioner. 
The aim is, over time, to reduce the level of corrections, ideally to arrive at a situation where no corrections are required.
Kommissionen er enig i Rettens bemžrkning om, at beslutningen om regnskabsafslutning, der er offentliggjort, er vanskelig at gennemskue. 
The Commission accepts the comment of the Court that the published financial clearance decision is not easily understood.
Den vil undersżge muligheden af at offentliggżre en klarere beslutning. 
It will examine the possibility of publishing a clearer decision.
I 1999 blev der ikke udskilt nogen regnskaber. 
No accounts were disjoined in 1999.
Kommissionen vil dog fortsžtte med at udskille regnskaberne, hvis der fortsat bestr usikkerhed ved afslutningen af attesteringsproceduren. 
However, the Commission will continue to disjoin the accounts if there are material uncertainties existing by the end of the certification process.
P grund af den begržnsede tid, der er til rdighed til afslutning af regnskaberne, er det naturligvis klogt at udskille regnskaberne, hvis der er behov for yderligere oplysninger. 
Given the limited time available to clear the accounts it is naturally prudent to disjoin accounts if more information is needed.
Hvor megen tid, der medgr til at tržffe den anden beslutning, afhžnger af mange faktorer. 
The time taken to make the second decision depends on several factors.
Tiden vil żges eller mindskes afhžngigt af, hvilke vanskeligheder man stżder p. 
It will increase or decrease depending on the difficulties identified.
Forsinkede betalinger til stżttemodtagerne 82-84. 
Late payments to beneficiaries 82 to 84.
Kommissionen kan benytte de skżnsbefżjelser, der er fastsat i forordning (EF) nr. 296/96. 
The Commission may apply the discretionary powers allowed for in Regulation (EC) No 296/96.
Dette skżn blev specielt benyttet i de fżrste r, hvor ordningen med direkte stżtte fandt anvendelse. 
This discretion was particularly used in the first years of the application of direct aids.
Afslutningsafdelingen er forpligtet til at basere sit arbejde p en risikoanalyse og er af Revisionsretten og Parlamentet blevet tilskyndet til at gżre dette. 
The clearance unit is obliged to carry out its work based on risk analysis, and has been encouraged to do so by the Court of Auditors and the Parliament.
Det kan sledes ikke undgs, at visse omrder ikke vil blive kontrolleret i en given periode. 
It is thus inevitable that some areas will not be examined in any given period.
Der er foretaget mange undersżgelser af dette spżrgsml. 
Various studies have been made of this question.
Kommissionen understreger, at disse betalinger ikke var ukorrekte eller uregelmžssige betalinger til den endelige modtager. 
The Commission stresses that these payments were not incorrect or irregular payments to the final beneficiary.
De vedrżrer betalinger fra medlemsstaterne til den endelige modtager efter udlżbet af den i forordningen fastsatte frist. 
They relate to payments made by the Member States to the final beneficiary after the regulatory deadline.
Denne ordning til fremme af betaling af stżttebelżb inden for de fastsatte frister blev indfżrt i 1996. 
This system for promoting the payment of aids within deadlines was introduced in 1996.
Den berżrte alle medlemsstater og alle ordninger. 
It affected all Member States and all schemes.
I de fżrste r under den ny ordning fandt mange medlemsstater det vanskeligt at afslutte det nżdvendige administrative arbejde inden fristens udlżb. 
In the first years of the scheme many Member States found it difficult to complete the administrative work necessary within the deadline.
I de fżrste r żnskede Kommissionen ikke at straffe de medlemsstater, der bestržbte sig p at beskytte EFŐs finansielle interesser. 
The Commission did not want, in the first years, to punish Member States that were acting to protect the financial interests of the Community.
Idżmmelsen af for store sanktioner kan have tilskyndet medlemsstaterne til at betale stżtte inden for de fastsatte frister, uanset om alle kontroller var afsluttet, og Kommissionen żnskede at undg denne risiko. 
Imposing too high penalties may have encouraged Member States to pay aids within the deadlines, whether or not all checks had been completed, and the Commission wanted to avoid this risk.
Den har derfor gjort brug af de i forordning (EF) nr. 
It has therefore applied the discretionary powers allowed for in Regulation (EC) No 296/1996.
De tilfžlde, hvor der blev gjort brug af disse skżnsbefżjelser, er anfżrt i arbejdsdokumenter, som er omdelt til medlemsstaterne for at bevise, at alle tilfžlde behandles ens. 
Cases where this discretionary power has been used are set down in working documents distributed to the Member States to demonstrate that all cases are treated equally.
Korrektionernes stżrrelse i forbindelse med forsinkede betalinger er faldende, uanset at der er fastsat frister for stadig flere foranstaltninger inden for rammerne af forpligtelsen til budgetdisciplin. 
The level of corrections for late payments is falling, even though, as part of its commitment to budgetary discipline, deadlines are being set for more and more measures.
C 69/30 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 2.3.2001 KONKLUSION 87. 
C 69/30 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 2.3.2001 CONCLUSIONS 87.
Kommissionen tager Rettens kommentar om, at der stadigvžk er for mange udbetalende organer, ad notam. 
The Commission notes the CourtŐs comment that there still too many paying agencies.
Det er imidlertid medlemsstaternes afgżrelse, hvor mange udbetalende organer der oprettes. 
However, it is for the Member States to decide how many paying agencies are established.
Kommissionen har tilskyndet medlemsstaterne til at rationalisere deres strukturer, og det har mange allerede gjort. 
The Commission has encouraged Member States to rationalise their structures and several have already done so.
En medlemsstats indbringelse af sager for Domstolen er en rettighed, der er anerkendt i traktaten. 
Bringing an action before the Court of Justice is a right which Member States enjoy under the Treaty.
For en medlemsstat kan en retssag enten fżre til, at den finansielle korrektion, Kommissionen har plagt den, fastholdes užndret, eller at den nedsžttes. 
For a Member State, a Court case can only lead to the maintenance or reduction of the financial correction imposed by the Commission.
Kommissionen er af den opfattelse, at forligsproceduren er et integrerende led i reformen af regnskabsafslutningsproceduren og kun vanskeligt kan adskilles fra alle de andre aspekter, der er indfżrt med reformen. 
The Commission believes that the conciliation procedure is an integral part of the reform of the clearance of accounts and cannot easily be separated from all the other aspects introduced in the reform.
Den finder, at forligsproceduren har bidraget til den gennemgribende forbedring af regnskabsafslutningsproceduren, som Retten har bemžrket. 
It believes that the conciliation procedure has contributed to the overall improvement in the clearance of accounts that the Court has identified.
Retten konkluderer, at det ikke er rimeligt at drage en negativ konklusion p baggrund af den kendsgerning, at korrektionerne er blevet mindre. 
The Court concludes that it is inappropriate to draw a negative conclusion from the lower level of corrections.
Kommissionen mžrker sig Rettens konklusioner i den forbindelse og er enig i dem. 
The Commission notes and shares the conclusions of the Court in this regard.
Kommissionen indrżmmer, at de sidste korrektioner for 1996 ikke vil ske hurtigere end under den gamle procedure. 
The Commission accepts that the last corrections for the 1996 year will not be made any more quickly than under the old procedure.
Den ny procedure har imidlertid fżrt til, at der foretages korrektioner for betydelige belżb p et langt tidligere stadium end fżrhen (se punkt 54-55). 
However, the new procedure has resulted in considerable amounts of corrections being imposed at a much earlier stage than in the past (see paragraphs 54 and 55).
1996 var det fżrste r, hvor den ny procedure fandt anvendelse Ń Kommissionen forventer, at de endelige korrektioner for efterfżlgende r vil blive foretaget vžsentligt tidligere, end det ville have vžret tilfžldet under den gamle ordning. 
1996 was the first year of the new procedure; the Commission expects the final corrections for later years to be introduced considerably earlier that would have been the case under the old system.
Et nyt rapporteringsformat, der blev indfżrt i forbindelse med regnskabsafslutningen 1999, har i vžsentlig grad forbedret indberetningen af oplysninger om stikprżvekontrol og fejlvurdering. 
A new reporting format introduced for the 1999 clearance considerably improved the reporting of information on sampling and error evaluation.
Regnskabsafslutningsafdelingen vil fortsat arbejde p at forbedre de udbetalende organers godkendelse og attestering. 
The clearance of accounts unit will continue to work to make improvements in both accreditation and certification of paying agencies.
Kommissionen mžrker sig Revisionsrettens vurdering gende ud p, at reformen af regnskabsafslutningsproceduren har vžret en succes, og hilser den velkommen. 
The Commission notes and welcomes the Court of AuditorsŐ assessment that the reform of the clearance of accounts procedure has been a success.
27.7.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende I (Meddelelser) REVISIONSRETTEN SŽRBERETNING Nr. 3/2001 om Kommissionens forvaltning af de internationale fiskeriaftaler, med Kommissionens svar C 210/1 (artikel 248 EF, stk. 
Official Journal C 210 Official Journal of the European Communities ISSN 0378-6986 C 210 Volume 44 27 July 2001 Page 1 English edition Notice No 2001/C 210/01 EN [Š] Information and Notices Contents I Information Court of Auditors Special Report No 3/2001 concerning the Commission's management of the international fisheries agreements, together with the Commission's replies
4, andet afsnit) (2001/C 210/01) INDHOLD RESUM .............................................................................. 
27.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 3/2001 concerningtheCommissionŐsmanagementoftheinternationalfisheriesagreements,togetherwith the CommissionŐs replies C 210/1 (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) (2001/C 210/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ............................................................................
Grundlžggendeoplysninger ................................................. 
3 GENERALCONTEXT .........................................................
Stabilefiskerimuligheder .................................................... 
Budgetaryaspects .........................................................
Overensstemmelsemellemfžllesskabspolitikkerne ................................ 
Underutilisationoftheagreements ............................................
Svaghedervedforvaltningen ................................................. 
ANNEXESItoIII.............................................................
27.7.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende RESUM Sigtet med revisionen Retten har undersżgt Kommissionens forvaltning af de internationale fiskeriaftaler, herunder navnlig, om mlene for dem er klart defineret og i sidste ende opfyldt. 
27.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities SUMMARY Aim of the audit The Court examined the CommissionŐs management of the international fisheries agreements, particularly the extent to which their objectives had been clearly defined and ultimately achieved.
Rettens revision vedrżrte de fem aftaler, der vejer tungest p Fžllesskabets budget (92 % i 1999). Rettens vžsentligste bemžrkninger er anfżrt i det fżlgende. 
The CourtŐs audit focused on the five most important agreements in terms of the cost borne by the Community budget (92 % in 1999). The CourtŐs main observations are set out below.
Omkostningseffektivitet I. Kommissionen bżr indfżre et system, der gżr det muligt at overvge de internationale fiskeriaftaler lżbende og foretage en grundig analyse af deres omkostningseffektivitet. 
Cost-benefit ratio I. The Commission still needs to set up a system enabling an ongoing monitoring and a detailed cost-benefit analysis to be made of the international fisheries agreements.
Det skulle give den mulighed for at kunne vurdere, i hvilket omfang mlene for disse aftaler er opfyldt (markedsforsyning, fangstmuligheder, omstrukturering, arbejdspladser). 
These measures should enable it to evaluate the extent to which the objectives of these agreements (market supply, fishing opportunities, restructuring, jobs) have been achieved.
Ń Kommissionen bżr definere resultatkriterier og -indikatorer for disse aftaler, sledes at den kan mle deres effektivitet. 
Ń It is up to the Commission to define criteria and performance indicators for these agreements in order to measure their effectiveness.
Fžllesskabet har sledes betalt finansielle godtgżrelser for fisk, som kun har eksisteret p papiret. 
ThefishingopportunitiesavailabletoCommunityfishermeninthewatersofthirdcountriesunderinter-nationalagreementsarenotalwaysusedtothefull.TheCommunityhasthuspaidfinancialcompensationfor fish which only existed on paper. Ń TheCommissionisinvitedtoensureaboveallthatactualuseismadeofthefishingopportunitiesoffered by these agreements.
Aftalernes mlsžtning III. Retten har konstateret, at de internationale fiskeriaftaler ikke er i overensstemmelse med strukturforanstaltningerne i den fžlles fiskeripolitik, og at de ikke samordnes hermed. 
Intended purposes III. The Court has found a lack of consistency and poor coordination between these international agreements and the structural aspect of the common fisheries policy.
Ń Kommissionen kunne navnlig sżrge for, at mlene vedrżrende omstrukturering er i overensstemmelse med de tilsvarende strukturfondsml, f.eks. nr den finansierer nye fartżjer. 
Ń The Commission could in particular ensure that the restructuring objectives of these agreements are consistent with those of the Structural Funds, for example, in the financing of new boats.
Flere af fiskeriaftalerne har et kommercielt aspekt samtidig med, at de skal fungere som udviklingsbistand. De to aspekter er blandet sammen, og derfor er det vanskeligt at evaluere aftalerne, hvilket gżr ansvarsfordelingen mellem Fžllesskabet og tredjelandene endnu mere uklar. 
Several of the fisheries agreements are intended both to play a commercial role and to assist in develop-mentaims.Thisintertwiningofdifferentpurposesmeansthatitisdifficulttoevaluatetheagreementsand makes it even harder to distinguish between the responsibilities that lie with the Community and those which belong to the third countries.
Ń Kommissionen vil fżrst kunne mle fordelene og omkostningerne ved fiskeriaftalerne og sammenligne dem p det samme grundlag, nr den klart har defineret disse forskellige ml. 
Ń If the Commission were to give a clear-cut definition of the various objectives of the fisheries agreements, it would be able to measure their benefits and costs and compare them on the same basis.