natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Delegationerne i Washington DC og Tanzania leverede dog eksempler på god praksis (jf. tekstboks 1) 3 EU-Udenrigstjenestens svar på de skriftlige spørgsmål i forbindelse med dechargen for 2013. 
Nevertheless, the Washington DC and Tanzania delegations provided examples of good practice (see Box 1). 3 EEAS 2013 discharge — answers by the EEAS to the written questions.
4 Revisionsrettens særberetning nr. 14/2014 »Hvordan beregner, reducerer og udligner EU’s institutioner og organer deres drivhusgasemissioner?« (http://eca.europa.eu). 
4 Court of Auditors Special Report No 14/2014, ‘How do the EU institutions and bodies calculate, reduce and offset their greenhouse gas emissions?’ (http://eca.europa.eu).
5 Kommissionen har offentliggjort et »EMAS toolkit for small organisations« og anbefaler standardmetoden »EMAS Easy«. 
5 The European Commission has published an ‘EMAS toolkit for small organisations’ and promotes a standardised methodology called ‘EMAS easy’.
Forbedring af miljøpåvirkningen i Washington DC og Tanzania I 2012 forpligtede delegationen i Washington DC sig sammen med andre diplomatiske repræsentationer i Washington DC til at gennemføre politikker, der sigter mod at forbedre miljøkvaliteten. 
Improving environmental impact in Washington DC and Tanzania In 2012, the Washington DC delegation joined other diplomatic missions in Washington DC in a pledge to pursue policies aimed at improving environmental quality.
Delegationen havde allerede udmærket sig ved at opnå guldcertificering for sine nye lejede kontorlokaler under ordningen »Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design« (LEED), et eksempel som udlejeren derefter fulgte ved at få LEED-guldcertificering for den øvrige del af bygningen i 2013. 
The delegation had already led the way in obtaining the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold award for its new office premises leased in Washington DC, an example that the landlord of the building subsequently followed by obtaining LEED gold certification for the remainder of the building in 2013.
I Tanzania ejer EU-Udenrigstjenesten en del af en kontorbygning sammen med Tyskland, Nederlandene og Det Forenede Kongerige. 
In Tanzania, the EEAS owns part of an office building together with Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
Bygningen forvaltes af et fælles forvaltningsudvalg, som udarbejder en årlig forvalt-ningsrapport. 
The building is managed by a Joint Management Committee, which produces an annual management report.
Den årlige forvaltningsrapport indeholder en analyse, der sammenligner det månedlige forbrug af elektricitet, diesel og vand i de foregående tre år for at identificere områder, hvor det er muligt at spare i fremtiden. c) Adgang for handicappede: Undertiden skal lokale krav opfyldes. 
The annual management report contains an analysis comparing monthly consumption of electricity, diesel and water for the previous 3 years in order to identify areas for possible future savings. (c) Accessibility for disabled people.
Dette var tilfældet i forbindelse med renovering af kontorer i Tyrkiet og Washington DC. 
This was the case for office renovations in Turkey and Washington DC.
Desuden kontrollerer EU-Udenrigstjenesten ved bygningsmiljøinspektioner (jf. punkt 49 b)), om lokalerne er tilgængelige for handicappede. 
Moreover, health and safety inspections by the EEAS (see paragraph 49(b)) check the accessibility of premises for disabled people.
Bemærkninger 14 10 Hovedkvarterets infrastrukturafdeling overvåger de enkelte delegationskontor-bygningers bygningsmiljømæssige og generelle status6. 
Observations 14 10 The Headquarters Infrastructure Division monitors the health and safety, security and general status of each Delegation office building6.
Kontorbygningernes gennemsnitlige stand i 2014 var tilfredsstillende (vurderet til 3,7 ud af 5), men der var mangler i nogle delegationer7 (jf. figur 4). 
The average condition of office buildings in 2014 was satisfactory (rated 3.7 out of 5) but there were deficiencies in some delegations7 (see Figure 4).
Delegationernes kontorbygninger 6 Vurderingen af en kontorbygnings stand omfatter tre kriterier, der bedømmes på en skala fra 0 (ubrugelig) til 5 (udmærket): bygningsmiljø (herunder konstruktion, teknisk udstyr osv.), sikkerhed og generel status (funktionalitet/image/ beliggenhed). 
6 The assessment of the condition of an office building combines three criteria rated from 0 (unusable) to 5 (excellent): health and safety (including structure, technical equipment, etc.), security and general status (functionality/ image/location).
7 De fire delegationer, der blev vurderet som værende i den værste stand i 2014, var Indien, Egypten, Senegal og Sri Lanka. 
7 The four delegations assessed as being in the worst condition in 2014 were India, Egypt, Senegal and Sri Lanka.
Kontorbygningernes stand Figur 4 
Delegation office buildings Rented Purchased before 2000 Purchased after 2000 Condition of office buildings Figure 4
Bemærkninger 15 11 Hovedkvarterets vurdering blev underbygget af resultaterne af vores spørgeskemaundersøgelse. 
Observations 15 11 The assessment by headquarters was supported by the findings of our survey.
De fleste respondenter mente, at delegationskontorerne opfylder deres behov hvad angår beliggenhed, fremme af arbejdsrelationer med partnere, arbejdsforhold, image, sikkerhed og plads (jf. figur 5). 
Most respondents considered that delegation offices meet their needs in terms of location, facilitation of working relationships with partners, working conditions, image, security and space (see Figure 5).
Over 90 % mente, at beliggenheden er hensigtsmæssig. 
Over 90 % considered that the location is suitable.
En fjerdedel af respondenterne mente imidlertid, at sikkerhed, image og arbejdsforhold ikke er hensigtsmæssige. 
However, a quarter of respondents considered that security, image and working conditions are not appropriate.
En tredjedel af respondenterne mente, at delegationskontorerne ikke giver tilstrækkelig plads. 
A third of respondents considered that delegation offices do not provide enough space.
Delegationernes kontorbygninger: egnethed 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Utilfredsstillende Tilfredsstillende Beliggenhed Fremmer relationer Arbejdsforhold Image Sikkerhed Tilstrækkelig plads Kilde: Spørgeskemabesvarelser fra EU-delegationernes administrationschefer. 
Suitability of delegation office buildings 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Location Facilitates relations Working conditions Image Security Enough space Source: Audit survey of heads of administration in EU delegations.
Respondenter Figur 5 
Respondents Figure 5
Bemærkninger 16 Boliger 12 Delegationschefens bolig stilles til rådighed af EU-Udenrigstjenesten. 
Observations 16 Residences 12 The residence of the head of delegation is provided by the EEAS.
Den har to funktioner, idet den både er et privat hjem og danner ramme for officielle receptioner. 
It has a double function: it is the private home as well as the venue for official receptions.
Boligen bør normalt forblive den samme, når en ny delegationschef tiltræder. 
Normally, the residence should not change when the head of delegation changes.
Bygningspolitikken fastsætter, at boligen skal have et repræsentativt image, at den ikke må være for prangende, og at den skal give mest mulig valuta for pengene. 
The building policy states that it should have a representative image, should not be excessively ostentatious and should provide best value for money.
Boligens beliggenhed og de foranstaltninger, der træffes for at garantere dens sikkerhed, bør vælges under hensyntagen til sikkerhedssituationen i værtslandet. 
The location of the residence and the steps taken to ensure its safety should take into account the security situation in the host country.
13 De fleste af spørgeskemaundersøgelsens respondenter mente, at delegationschefernes boliger opfylder behovene hvad angår sikkerhed, beliggenhed, image, fremme af relationer med partnere, stand og plads (jf. figur 6). 
13 Most respondents to our survey considered that residences of heads of delegation meet needs in terms of security, location, image, facilitation of relationships with partners, condition and space (see Figure 6).
En fjerdedel af respondenterne mente dog, at delegationschefens bolig ikke har tilstrækkelig plads, og at boligens stand ikke er tilfredsstillende. 
However, a quarter of respondents considered that the head of delegation’s residence does not provide enough space and that the condition of the residence is not satisfactory.
Delegationschefernes boliger: egnethed 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Utilfredsstillende Tilfredsstillende Sikkerhed Beliggenhed Image Fremmer relationer Bygningens stand Tilstrækkelig plads Kilde: Spørgeskemabesvarelser fra EU-delegationernes administrationschefer. 
Suitability of residences of heads of delegation 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Security Location Image Facilitates relations Building condition Enough space Source: Audit survey of heads of administration in EU delegations.
Respondenter Figur 6 
Respondents Figure 6
Bemærkninger 17 14 Boligen bør højst være på 600 m2 (jf. punkt 22). 
Observations 17 14 The surface area of the residence should be a maximum of 600 m2 (see paragraph 22).
Boligen med omgivende uden-dørsarealer bør have omtrent samme størrelse som medlemsstaternes ambas-sadørboliger i det samme land8. 
The surface area of the residence and the surrounding land should be in the range of the size of residences of ambassadors of Member States in the same country8.
Over 40 % af respondenterne mente, at delegationschefens bolig har mindre plads end de fleste ambassadørboliger. 
Over 40 % of respondents to the survey considered that the head of delegation’s residence provides less space than most embassy residences.
I 2014 var EU-delegationsboligernes gennemsnitsareal 488 m2 (jf. figur 7). 
The average surface area of EU delegation residences in 2014 was 488 m2 (see Figure 7).
40 boliger (30 %) på under 400 m2. 
There were some 40 residences (30 %) under 400 m2.
Delegationsboliger 8 EU-Udenrigstjenestens bygningspolitik: Boliger — politik og udvælgelse. 
8 EEAS building policy: Residences — policy and selection.
Bemærkninger 18 15 Hovedkvarterets infrastrukturafdeling overvåger delegationsboligernes stand9 (jf. figur 8). 
Observations 18 15 The Headquarters Infrastructure Division monitors the condition9 of delegation residences (see Figure 8).
I 2014 var boligernes gennemsnitsstand 4,6 ud af 5. 
The average condition of residences in 2014 was 4.6 out of 5.
Dette er højere end kontorers gennemsnitsstand, der er vurderet til 3,7 ud af 5 (jf. punkt 10). 
This is higher than the average condition of offices, rated 3.7 out of 5 (see paragraph 10).
Lejet Købt før 2000 Købt efter 2000 Delegationsboliger 9 Vurderingen af en delegationschefs boligs stand omfatter tre kriterier, der bedømmes på en skala fra 0 (ubrugelig) til 5 (udmærket): bygningsmiljø (konstruktion, teknisk udstyr osv.), sikkerhed og generel status (funktionalitet/image/ beliggenhed). 
9 The assessment of the condition of a head of delegation’s residence combines three criteria rated from 0 (unusable) to 5 (excellent): health and safety (including structure, technical equipment, etc.), security and general status (functionality/ image/location).
EU-Udenrigstjenesten har ingen data om 53 boligers stand (jf. punkt 57 b)). 
The EEAS has no data on the condition of 53 residences (see paragraph 57(b)).
Bemærkninger 19 Personaleindkvartering 16 EU-Udenrigstjenesten forvalter indkvarteringen af ca. 2 400 delegationsmedar-bejdere10 ved hjælp af to metoder, der er fastsat i personalevedtægten: a) EU-delegationerne stiller gratis indkvartering til rådighed for ca. 
Observations 19 Staff accommodation 16 The EEAS manages accommodation for around 2 400 staff in delegations10 through the following two methods provided for in the Staff Regulations. (a) EU delegations provide accommodation free of charge for around 1 400 staff.
Med nogle få undtagelser drejer det sig om lejede og ikke ejede boliger. 
With a few exceptions, this accommodation is rented rather than owned.
Siden januar 2014 har EU-delegationerne hovedsagelig haft mulighed for at benytte denne metode i højrisikolande eller i lande, hvor forholdene på boligudlejningsmarkedet gør det svært at finde passende indkvartering11 b) EU-delegationerne godtgør udgifterne til boliger, der lejes af ca. 1 000 ansatte. 
Since January 2014 EU delegations have been able to provide accommodation on this basis mainly in high-risk countries or in countries where rental market conditions make it difficult to find suitable accommodation11. (b) EU delegations reimburse the cost of accommodation rented by around 1 000 staff.
17 I begge tilfælde er den leje, som delegationen betaler eller godtgør, begrænset af et lejeloft for hvert ansættelsessted uden for EU. 
17 In both cases, the rent paid or reimbursed by the delegation is limited by a rental ceiling drawn up for each place of employment outside the EU.
Dette loft er baseret på den ansattes familiesammensætning og tager højde for det lokale boligudlejningsmarked. 
This ceiling is based on the composition of the staff member’s family and takes into account the local rental market.
18 EU-Udenrigstjenestens bygningspolitik fastsætter, at det udstationerede personales boliger bør opfylde EU-Udenrigstjenestens sikkerhedsstandarder. De bør f.eks. kun være beliggende i tilladte områder. 
18 The EEAS building policy states that accommodation of expatriate staff should comply with EEAS security standards, for example it should be located in permitted areas only.
De bør også afspejle et passende EU-image12. 
It should also reflect an appropriate image of the EU12.
19 Spørgeskemaundersøgelsens respondenter gav udtryk for stor tilfredshed med personaleindkvarteringen. Ca. 
19 Respondents to our survey expressed a high level of satisfaction with staff accommodation.
90 % af respondenterne mente, at personaleind-kvarteringen er passende hvad angår sikkerhed, plads, beliggenhed og levevilkår (jf. figur 9). 
Around 90 % of respondents considered that the security, space, location and living conditions of staff accommodation are suitable (see Figure 9).
10 Alle delegationsmedarbejdere undtagen lokalt ansatte. 
10 All staff in delegations except local employees.
11 Afgørelse fra Unionens højtstående repræsentant for udenrigsanliggender og sikkerhedspolitik af 17.12.2013 om reglerne for gennemførelse af boligpolitik i EU-delegationer (HR DEC(2013) 011). 
11 Decision of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 17.12.2013 regarding the rules for the implementation of housing policy in EU delegations (HR DEC(2013) 011).
12 EU-Udenrigstjenestens bygningspolitik: Indkvarteringspolitik for tjenestemænd, der er udstationeret i tredjelande. 
12 EEAS building policy: Accommodation policy for officials serving in third countries.
Bemærkninger 20 Delegationernes personaleindkvartering: egnethed 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Utilfredsstillende Tilfredsstillende Sikkerhed Plads Beliggenhed Levevilkår Kilde: Spørgeskemabesvarelser fra EU-delegationernes administrationschefer. 
Observations 20 Suitability of staff accommodation in delegations 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Security Space Location Living conditions Source: Audit survey of heads of administration in EU delegations.
Respondenter Figur 9 
Respondents Figure 9
Bemærkninger 21 I de fleste kontorbygninger og nogle boliger er bygningspolitikkens areallofter overskredet Det gennemsnitlige areal pr. person i delegationskontorerne ligger over bygningspolitikkens arealloft 20 EU-Udenrigstjenestens bygningspolitik anbefaler, at der i delegationskontorerne er højst 35 m2 pr. person (før 2013 var bygningspolitikkens arealloft 42 m2)13. 
Observations 21 Space in most office buildings, and some residences, exceeds the building policy ceilings Average space per person in delegation offices exceeds the building policy ceiling 20 The EEAS building policy recommends that delegation offices should have a maximum size of 35 m2 per person (the maximum in the building policy before 2013 was 42 m2)13.
Beregningen er baseret på alle arealer (ikke kun kontorer, men også fællesarealer) divideret med alle faste stillinger, undtagen stillinger, der ikke kræver et kontor (f.eks. chauffører). 
The calculation is based on all areas (not only offices but also common areas) divided by all permanent posts, except for posts which do not need an office (e.g. drivers).
Bygningspolitikken fastsætter, at visse arealer ikke skal medtages i beregningen, eksempelvis et ekstra mødelokale, hvis det er nødvendigt for at opfylde formandskabets behov i henhold til Lissabontraktaten. 
The building policy provides for the exclusion of certain areas from the calculation such as an additional conference room to meet the needs of the presidency function under the Lisbon Treaty.
Nye delegationskontorer bør bestå af en blanding af individuelle kontorer, fælles kontorer til 2-4 personer og kontorlandskaber. 
New delegation offices should consist of a mixture of individual offices, shared offices for 2-4 people and open-space areas.
Der bør reserveres individuelle kontorer til et lille antal medarbejdere, hvis opgaver kræver et sådant. 
Individual offices should be reserved for a small number of staff whose function requires one.
21 I 2014 overskred ca. 85 delegationer maksimumarealet på 35 m2 pr. person14: Det gennemsnitlige areal pr. person var 41 m2 (jf. figur 10)15. 
21 In 2014, some 85 delegations exceeded the maximum space of 35 m2 per person14. The average space per person was 41 m2 (see Figure 10)15.
Hvis gennemsnitsarealet pr. person blev reduceret, ville det føre til besparelser på lejeudgifterne16 og på driftsomkostningerne. 
Reducing the average space per person would lead to savings on rent16 and running costs.
Nogle boligers areal ligger over bygningspolitikkens loft 22 EU-Udenrigstjenestens bygningspolitik fastsætter, at det samlede areal af samtlige rum i delegationschefens bolig højst bør være 600 m2. 
Some residences exceed the ceiling in the building policy 22 The EEAS building policy states that the maximum total surface area of all rooms of the residence of the head of delegation should be 600 m2.
Selv om det gennemsnitlige areal af EU-delegationernes boliger i 2014 lå under dette loft (jf. punkt 14), lå 34 boliger (24 %) over loftet (jf. figur 7)17. 
Although the average surface area of EU delegation residences in 2014 was under this ceiling (see paragraph 14), 34 residences (24 %) exceeded the ceiling (see Figure 7)17.
13 Nyerhvervede bygninger bør være store nok til at rumme en stigning på 10 % i antallet af ansatte. 
13 Newly purchased buildings should be large enough to accommodate a 10 % increase in staff.
14 De delegationer, der havde det største kontorareal pr. person, var delegationen til De Forenede Nationer i New York (90 m2 pr. person) og delegationen til De Forenede Nationer i Genève (104 m2 pr. person). 
14 The delegations with the highest office space per person were the delegation to the United Nations in New York (90 m2 per person) and the delegation to the United Nations in Geneva (104 m2 per person).
15 I denne analyse fratrækkes det kontorareal, der er udlejet til andre organisationer. 
15 This analysis deducts office space rented to other organisations.
Den omfatter ikke delegationer med færre end 10 medarbejdere — disse delegationer har alle mere end 35 m2 pr. person. 
It excludes delegations with fewer than 10 staff, all of which have more than 35 m2 per person.
Analysen er baseret på faste stillinger. 
The analysis is based on permanent posts.
Medtagelsen af ca. 200 midlertidige praktikanter og nationale eksperter ville reducere det gennemsnitlige areal pr. person til 40 m2. 
The inclusion of around 200 temporary trainees and national experts would reduce the average space per person to 40 m2.
16 I 2014 var den samlede årlige udgift til leje af delegationskontorer 53 millioner euro (jf. figur 1), hvilket betyder, at hver kvadratmeter af gennemsnitsarealet pr. person kostede 1,3 millioner euro. 
16 The total annual rent of delegation offices in 2014 was 53 million euro (see Figure 1), which means that each m2 of the average space per person cost 1.3 million euro.
17 Boligen i Indonesien, som var på1200m2,varenafde største boliger. 
17 The residence in Indonesia, at 1200m2,wasoneofthe largest residences.
Der er underskrevet en kontrakt om leje af en ny bolig på 580 m2 fra september 2015. 
A contract has been signed to rent a new residence of 580 m2 from September 2015.
Bemærkninger 22 Kontorareal pr. person i delegationerne m2 pr. person 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Anbefalet maksimum (35 m2) Gennemsnit (41 m2) Delegationernes kontorbygninger NB: Delegationer med færre end 10 medarbejdere er ikke medtaget. 
Observations 22 Office space per person in delegations m2 per person 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Maximum recommended (35 m2) Average (41 m2) Delegation office buildings Note: Excludes delegations with fewer than 10 staff members.
Kilde: Den Europæiske Revisionsret på grundlag af data fra EU-Udenrigstjenesten. 
Source: European Court of Auditors based on EEAS data.
Figur 10 
Figure 10
Bemærkninger 23 EU-Udenrigstjenesten ejer bygninger, som den ikke længere bruger 23 De delegationskontorbygninger, der blev købt før 2000 og stadig anvendes af EU-Udenrigstjenesten, er blandt de kontorbygninger, der er i dårligst stand (jf. figur 4). 
Observations 23 The EEAS owns buildings which it no longer uses 23 EU delegation office buildings purchased before 2000 and still used by the EEAS are among the office buildings in the worst condition (see Figure 4).
Delegationspersonalet i Gabon er flyttet til små midlertidige kontorer, da den kontorbygning, der blev købt i 1996, nu har alvorlige konstruktionsmæssi-ge problemer. 
Delegation staff in Gabon have relocated to small temporary offices, as the office building purchased in 1996 now has serious structural problems.
24 De ejede boliger er mindre og lettere at vedligeholde. 
24 Owned residences are smaller and easier to maintain.
Den gennemsnitlige stand for ejede boliger, der blev købt før 2000 og stadig anvendes af EU-Udenrigstjenesten, er 4,6 ud af 5 (jf. figur 8). 
The average condition of owned residences purchased before 2000 and still used by the EEAS is 4.6 out of 5 (see Figure 8).
Dette er betydeligt bedre end den gennemsnitlige stand på 3,4 for ejede delegationskontorer, der blev købt før 2000. 
This is considerably better than the average condition of 3.4 of owned delegation offices purchased before 2000.
25 Selv om EU-Udenrigstjenesten ikke længere bruger 20 % af de delegationsbygninger, som den ejer (7 ud af 33 kontorbygninger og 6 ud af 30 boliger), har den beholdt dem. 
25 Although the EEAS no longer uses 20 % of the delegation buildings it owns (7 out of 33 office buildings and 6 out of 30 residences), it has retained them.
De ubenyttede kontorbygninger i Tchad, Den Centralafrikanske Republik og Rwanda lejes ud til andre organisationer såsom GD for Humanitær Bistand og Civilbeskyttelse eller en medlemsstats ambassade. 
The unused office buildings in Chad, the Central African Republic and Rwanda are rented to other organisations, such as DG Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection or a Member State’s embassy.
Andre bygninger står imidlertid ubenyttede hen. 
Other buildings, however, are retained unoccupied.