natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(1) Bolivia, Etiopien, Georgien, Madagaskar, Niger og Yemen. 
46 4,5 40 5,8 35 5,7 (1) Bolivia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Madagascar, Niger and Yemen.
17.4.2003 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 93/19 Ń teknisk bistand og uddannelse i landbrugsteknik, finansiering og ledelse; Ń institutionel kapacitetsopbygning i ministerier og andre regeringsorganer, kommuner og lokalsamfund med ansvar for fżdevaresikkerhedsaktioner Ń information og uddannelse inden for Čmad og sundhedÇ, fremme af afvekslende kostsammensžtning Ń kampagner om hygiejne og sanitžre forhold Ń stżtte til sygesikring Ń stżtte til skoler og vuggestuer i landdistrikter Ń stżtte til sociale sikkerhedsnet Ń valutafaciliteter til finansiering af fżdevareimport. 
17.4.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 93/19 Ń Technical assistance and training in agricultural techniques, finance and management Ń Institutional-capacity-building for ministries and other government bodies, municipalities and local communities in charge of food security operations Ń Information and training in food and health issues, promotion of diet diversification Ń Campaigns on hygiene and sanitation Ń Support for health security Ń Support for rural schools and nurseries Ń Support for social safety nets Ń Foreign currency facilities to finance imports of foodstuffs Source: European Court of Auditors.
(2) FNŐs Hjžlpeorganisation for Palžstinaflygtninge i Mellemżsten. 
(2) UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees.
(3) Den Internationale Rżde Kors Komit. 
(3) International Committee of the Red Cross.
(4) Southern African Development Community. 
(4) Southern African Development Community.
(5) De Forenede Nationers verdensfżdevareprogram. 
(5) World Food Programme of the United Nations.
Kilde: CRIS (SINCOM 2). 
Source: CRIS (Sincom 2).
(4) De Forenede Nationers Verdensfżdevareprogram. 
(4) World food programme of the United Nations.
C 93/24 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 17.4.2003 KOMMISSIONENS SVAR RESUM II. 
C 93/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.4.2003 THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES SUMMARY II.
Kommissionen fremlagde i 2001 en meddelelse, der efter-lyser en bedre integration af fżdevaresikkerheden i strategierne for fattigdomsbekžmpelse og udvikling. 
The Commission put forward a communication in 2001 which provides an improved framework for the integration of food security issues into overall poverty reduction and development strategies.
Desuden har Kommissionen sżgt at skabe en bedre forbindelse mellem stżtte til nżdhjžlp, genrejsning og udvikling. 
Moreover, the Commission has sought to ensure a better linkage between relief, rehabilitation and development aid.
V. Modtagerlandene har langt mere systematisk taget hensyn til fżdevaresikkerheden i forbindelse med deres fattigdomsbekžmpelse og udviklingsstrategier i den seneste programperiode. 
V. In the latest programming exercise, food security issues have been taken into account much more systematically by recipient countries as part of their overall poverty reduction and development strategies.
Kommissionen har bestržbt sig p at bist udviklingslandene med at opbygge kapacitet og etablere de nżdvendige systemer. 
The Commission has made efforts to assist developing countries in building capacity and establishing the necessary systems.
Det er planlagt at foretage en ny evaluering i 2004. 
A new evaluation is planned for 2004.
VIII. ring, evaluering og gennemfżrelse af tiltag af kompleks art inden for fżdevaresikkerheden m forbedres. 
VIII. are to be improved in terms of programming, appraisal and implementation of food security operations of a highly complex nature.
Det bliver emnet for den nžvnte evaluering i 2004. 
This will be the subject of the evaluation in 2004.
Der modtages imidlertid regelmžssigt oplysninger om behov, problemer og gennemfżrelsesstade via rapportering, undersżgelser, evalueringer og besżg. 
Nevertheless, information on needs, problems and the state of implementation is received regularly through reporting, reviews, evaluations and missions.
De centrale institutioner i modtagerlandene er ofte meget skrżbelige, og deres formelle interventionskapacitet er begržnset. 
The central institutions in the beneficiary countries are often very fragile and their capacity for formal intervention is limited.
Revisionsretten har imidlertid konstateret, at mange projekter er teknisk set godt gennemfżrt og til nytte for den pgžldende befolkning. 
Nevertheless, the Court has found that many of the projects were technically well executed and useful for the population concerned.
X. Der gennemfżres regelmžssigt nye midtvejs-og afslutnings-evalueringer og kontroller. 
X. Mid-term and final evaluations and audits are now carried out on a regular basis.
17.4.2003 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 93/25 Der blev foretaget en ekstern evaluering af forordningen i 2000. 
17.4.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 93/25 An external evaluation of the implementation of the Regulation was made in 2000.
Derefter udarbejdede Kommissionen en meddelelse (der skal forelžgges Parlamentet og Rdet) for mere klart at definere den rolle, som forordningen skulle spille, samt at redegżre for de specifikke ml og anvendelser, som instrumenterne deri skulle have. 
As a result, the Commission prepared a communication (to be submitted to the European Parliament and to the Council) to define more clearly the role of the Regulation and the specific objectives and applications of its various instruments.
Forordningen var berettiget af fżlgende grunde: Ń behov for et specifikt udviklingsinstrument til at understżtte EFŐs indsats for at: Ń bekžmpe fżdevareusikkerheden som et fżrste skridt med henblik p nedbringelse af fattigdommen p lang sigt i nogle lande Ń afbżde situationer med kritisk fżdevareforsyning p nationalt og regionalt plan, og Ń afbżde specifikke ernžringsproblemer Ń skabe forbindelse mellem nżdhjžlp, genrejsning og udvikling Ń opfylde EFŐs forpligtelser ifżlge internationale aftaler og multilaterale initiativer (internationale udviklingsml og fżdeva-rekonventionen). 
Maintaining the Regulation was justified on the basis of: Ń theneedforaspecificdevelopmentinstrumenttosupport the CommunityŐs efforts to address: Ń structural food insecurity as a first step in long-term poverty reduction in some countries, Ń critical food supply-related situations at national and regional levels, and Ń specific nutritional problems, Ń the need to bridge the gap between relief, rehabilitation and development, Ń Community commitments to international agreements and multilateral initiatives (international development targets (IDTs) and the Food Aid Convention).
1292/96 opmuntrer ligeledes til at integrere fżdevaresikkerheden i den nationale udviklingspolitik og strategierne for bekžmpelse af fattigdommen. 
Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 also encourages the integration of food security into national development policies and poverty reduction strategies.
BEMŽRKNINGER 17. 
OBSERVATIONS 17.
Forordning (EF) nr. 1292/96 har gjort det muligt at integrere fżdevarehjžlpen i en flerrig mellemfristet efterkrise-strategi, der skal g forud for en udviklingspolitik, der skal sikre fżdevaresikkerheden p lang sigt. P denne mde er fżdevarehjžlpen og de fżdevaresikkerhedsaktioner, der aflżser den, et žgte bindeled mellem krise og udvikling. 
Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 enabled food aid to be placed inamedium-termpost-crisisconceptthatprecedesalong-term food security development policy using a multiannual approach. In this sense, food aid and the food security measures that replace it are an effective link between crisis and development.
Forordningen fra 1996 (kapitel 1, artikel 1) og meddelelsen KOM(2001) 473 viser, at formlet med dette instrument ogs er at afhjžlpe situationer, hvor der hersker fżdevareusikkerhed som fżlge af alvorlig mangel p fżdevarer eller fżdevarekriser. 
The 1996 Regulation (Article 1 of Chapter 1) and communication COM(2001) 473 show that this instrument is designed to respond as well to Ôsituations of food insecurity caused by serious food shortages or food crisesŐ. These operations are short term.
1292/96 kommer til at spille en sžrlig rolle ved sammenkžd-ningen af nżdhjžlp, genrejsning og udvikling eller med andre ord som mellemled mellem humanitžr bistand og de almindelige udviklingsinstrumenter (bl.a. EUF, ALA, MEDA). Det er i denne rolle som mellemled at Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 
The Commission therefore considers that Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 has a specific role as an instrument for linking emergency, rehabilitation and development or, in other words, as a bridge between humanitarian aid and the mainstream development instruments (EDF, ALA, MEDA and others).
1292/96 skal ikke bruges som almindeligt udviklingsinstrument. 
Regulation(EC)No1292/96isnotmeanttobeusedasa mainstream development instrument.
Kommissionen erkender imidlertid, at der stadig er behov for en stor indsats, hvis overlapning mellem Kommissionens almindelige udviklingsinstrumenter (f.eks. EUF, ALA, MED) og Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 
However, the Commission acknowledges that considerable efforts are still required to avoid duplication between the CommissionŐs mainstream development instruments (EDF, ALA, MEDA and others) and the Regulation.
En af de mder, hvorp det kan sikres, at Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 1292/96 absolut kun bruges efter sin hensigt, er at vžlge prioriterede lande, der er meget udsatte for fżdevarerisici og -kriser. 
One means of ensuring that Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 is used strictly for its intended purpose is to choose priority countries highly vulnerable to food security risks and crises.
Desuden er der med indfżrelse af nationale udviklingsstrategier og Kommissionens landestrategipapirer nu et nyt middel til p kohžrent mde at samle al udviklingsbistand i n strategi. 
Moreover, the introduction of national development strategies and Commission country strategy papers have provided new tools to integrate in a coherent manner all development assistance into a single strategic framework.
Dette har vžret tilfžldet f.eks. i Mozambique, Bolivia og for nylig i Etiopien. 
This has been the case, for example, in Mozambique, Bolivia and recently in Ethiopia.
Uheldigvis str, som Kommissionen erkender, mlene for fżdevaresikkerheden, der ofte prioriteres i mange udviklingslandes politik, ikke altid fżrst p listen i de nationale udviklingsstrategier. 
The Commission recognises that, unfortunately, food security objectives, often declared a priority in many developing countriesŐ policies, are not always put at the forefront of national development strategies.
Skżnt fżdevaresikkerheden mske prioriteres i mange udviklingslande, sžtter mange regeringer alt for ofte ikke nedbringelse af fattigdommen, fżdevaresikkerheden og udvikling af landdistrikter żverst p dagsordenen i forbindelse med deres nationale udviklingsstrategier. 
Although food security objectives might be declared a priority in many developing countries, too often Governments do not put poverty reduction, food security and rural development concerns at the forefront of their national development strategies.
Det gžlder bl.a. i de lande, som Revisionsretten har besżgt, dvs. Niger, Georgien, Etiopien og Yemen, hvor fżdevaresikkerheden er blevet et prioriteret omrde. 
This was the case in some of the countries visited by the Court, e.g. Niger, Georgia, Ethiopia andYemenwherefoodsecurityhasbecomeapriority.
Ud over det, som fastsžttes i forordningen fra 1996, opfordrer Kommissionen modtagerregeringerne til at integrere fżdevaresikkerheden i deres strategidokumenter for fattigdomsbekžmpelse, og den stżtter dem deri. 
The Commission not only meets the requirements of the 1996 Regulation, it encourages and assists the beneficiary governments in including food security in their poverty reduction strategy papers.
Siden Revisionsrettens besżg og som omtalt i ovenstende punkt 20 vil ifżlge Kommissionen Etiopien, Niger og snart Georgien integrere elementer af fżdevaresikkerhedspolitikken i deres strategidokumenter for fattigdomsbekžmpelse. 
The Commission would point out that, since the visit by the Court of Auditors and pursuant to paragraph 20, Ethiopia, Niger, and soon Georgia, will be incorporating the elements of food security policy into their poverty reduction strategy papers.
Denne integration er gennemfżrt p initiativ af Kommissionen og efter en dybtgende dialog med regeringen. 
Including food security in the strategy papers (Niger, Ethiopia and Georgia) was carried out at the initiative of the Commission and on the basis of closer dialogue with the governments.
Desuden finansierer Kommissionen vigtige programmer (udarbejdelse af matrikelregistre, fordeling af skżder, ...), isžr i de nye uafhžngige stater og i Hondu-ras. 
The Commission also finances major programmes (preparing for a land C 93/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.4.2003 registry, allotting of land titles, etc.) in the new independent States and Honduras.
Derfor fremhžves det i pro-grammeringsretningslinjerne for budgetlinjen vedrżrende fżdevaresikkerhed for 2002 og 2003-2004, at der er behov for at lžgge vžgt p tvžrgende spżrgsml som kżnsspżrgsmlet. 
The programming guidelines for the food security budget heading for 2002 and for 2003/04 therefore highlight the need to give due attention to cross-cutting issues, and in particular, gender.
F.eks. er der i Bangladesh sžrlige projekter for indtžgtsskabelse for kvinder. 
For example, in Bangladesh there are specific income-generation projects for women.
Fżdevaresikkerhedsstrategien i Etiopien har vžret behžftet med fejl, og Kommissionen har derfor forstžrket sin dialog med regeringen og herved defineret sine prioriteringer for intervention til lżsning af de strukturelle rsager til denne usikkerhed (fżdevaresikkerhedsprogram blev godkendt i august 2002). 
In view of the inadequacies of the food-security strategy in Ethiopia, the Commission stepped up its dialogue with the Government and defined its intervention priorities, addressing the structural causes of food insecurity (food security programme approved in August 2002).
Imidlertid kan den nuvžrende krisesituation udsžtte gennemfżrelsen af denne strategi. 
The current crisis, however, could defer implementation of that strategy.
I Georgiens og Yemens fżdevaresikkerhedsdokumenter fastsžttes visse prioriteringer, isžr oprettelse af informationssystemer og udarbejdelse af socialsikringsprogrammer. 
The national food security papers for Georgia and the Yemen fix certain priorities, in particular as regards the setting-up of information systems and social security programmes.
Kommissionen er dog klar over, at disse prioriteringer m mlrettes. 
Nonetheless, the Commission is aware that it is still necessary to target priorities.
Nigers strategi for fżdevaresikkerhed er en operativ strategi. 
In Niger, the food security plan is an operational strategy.
Det er derfor normalt, at den munder ud i en handlingsplan. 
It is therefore normal that it results in an action plan.
Strategien har imidlertid tjent til at mlrette de nationale strategidokumenter for fattigdomsbekžmpelse og udvikling af landdistrikter. tistikker. 
In September 2002 PARIS21 launched a measure aimed at improving agricultural and rural statistics in 10 African countries as part of the fight against poverty and food insecurity. (c) The Commission considers it is necessary to have an up-to-date agricultural census; in Yemen, the current census is financed by the food security programme.
34. og Rdet i sine konklusioner 15390/01 fandt, at det ikke var nżdvendigt at žndre indholdet af forordning (EF) nr. 1292/96 (fżr en ny dybtgende evaluering), indeholder KOM(2001) 473 de fleste af de anbefalinger, der blev fremsat under evalueringen i 2000/ 2001. Som ppeget i sit svar p afsnit 3-9 bekržftede Kommissionen forordning (EF) nr. 
While the Commission in its communication COM(2001) 473 and the Council in its conclusions 15390/01 considered that it was not the right time to alter the content of Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 (before a new and more in-depth evaluation), COM(2001) 473 took on board most of the recommendations put forward by the 2000/01 evaluation. As pointed out in its reply to paragraphs 3 to 9, the Commission confirmed the specific role of Regulation (EC) No 1292/96.
2 vedrżrende gennemfżrelsen af forordning (EF) nr. 1292/96 om fżdevarehjžlpspolitik og fżdevarehjžlpsforvaltning og om sžrlige aktioner til stżtte for fżdevaresikkerheden skal gennemfżres i 2004. 
A second evaluation of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 on food aid policy and food aid management and special operations to support food security as a whole will be carried out in 2004.
Herved skal der ses grundigt p de bredere principielle og strategiske rammer, inden for hvilke Kommissionen yder fżdevarehjžlp og stżtter fżdevaresikkerheden, og ogs spżrgsmlet om politikkernes kohžrens skal tages op. 
This evaluation will look in depth at the broader conceptual and strategic development framework in which the CommissionŐs support to food aid and food security is provided and will also address the issue of policy coherence.
Ved evalueringen skal det isžr vurderes, hvorledes det er muligt fuldstžndig at integrere/fusionere bde mlene for fżdevaresikkerheden og instrumentariet hertil i Kommissionen generelle udviklingsstrategi. 
It will in particular consider possible options to integrate/merge fully both the food security objective and the instrument into the CommissionŐs overall development device.
Ligeledes skal mulighederne for en klarere ansvarsdeling mellem DEV/EuropeAid-samarbejdskontoret og ECHO med hensyn til programmering, mlsžtning og hndtering af fżdevarehjžlp i naturalier overvejes. 
It will also look at possible options to define more clearly the division of responsibilities between DEV/EuropeAid Cooperation Office and ECHO with regard to programming, targeting and handling of food aid in kind.
De lokale faglige bistandsmedarbejderes mandat er blevet pržciseret i forbindelse med decentraliseringen af de finansielle instrumenter til fżdevaresikkerhed. Fżdevaresikkerhedseksper-terne har sledes siden 2002 vžret integreret i fagministerierne, dvs. arbejdet internt i delegationerne. 
The tasks of the local technical assistants was clarified in the context of the devolution of the food security financial instrument: food security experts have since 2002 been part of the technical ministries or the delegations.
Som led i decentraliseringen af stżtteaktionerne for fżdevaresikkerheden gennemfżres den decentralisering, der vedrżrer indkaldelsen af forslag fra ngoŐer, i delegationerne i begyndelsen af 2004. 
As part of the devolution of food security support measures, the call for proposals from NGOs will be effective in all delegations at the start of 2004.
Forslagsindkaldelsen forvaltes sledes direkte af delegationerne, procedurerne forenkles og fristerne afkortes. 
The call for proposals will thus be managed directly by the delegations, procedures will be simplified and operations speeded up.
RESAL-webstedet blev forvaltet af en ngo p grundlag af en servicekontrakt, der ophżrte i august 2001. 
The RESAL site was managed by an NGO under a service contract that ended in August 2001.
Da dette websted er af interesse, har Kommissionen besluttet at ajourfżre det, integrere det i udvalget af internet-websteder og at sikre ajourfżringen deraf fra 2003. 
Owing to the interest in the site, the Commission decided to reintroduce it and add it to the range of its websites; it will be updated from 2003.
17.4.2003 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 93/27 46. 
17.4.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 93/27 46.
Kommissionen erkender, at det centrale SINCOM2-system endnu ikke gżr det muligt at skelne mellem forskud og betalinger for allerede udfżrt arbejde. 
The Commission recognises that the central Sincom2 system does not yet allow a distinction to be made between advance payments and those relating to work which has been completed.
Kommissionen skal ifżlge artikel 81 i finansforordningen og artikel 102 i gennemfżrelsesreglerne, der gžlder fra 1. januar 2003, tržffe foranstaltninger til afhjžlpning heraf. 
The Commission is taking action to address this under Article 81 of the Financial Regulation and Article 102 of the Implementing Rules applicable from 1 January 2003.
Desuden indgr dette spżrgsml i Kommissionens meddelelse af 17. december 2002 om modernisering af regnskabssystemet. 
Moreover, this subject is also included in the Commission communication of 17 December 2002 on modernising the accounting system.
Denne database giver sledes status over programmernes gennemfżrelse (forpligtelser, kontrakter, betalinger ...). 
The database will show the current status of programmes (commitments, contracts, payments, etc.).
Foruden Revisionsrettens bemžrkninger skyldes forsinkelserne i gennemfżrelsen, isžr med hensyn til budgetteringen, vžsentligst, at de modtagende landes regeringer ikke overholder betingelserne i forbindelse med de politiske og institutionelle reformer. 
Apart from the CourtŐs comments, delays in implementation, in particular as regards budgetary support, are due essentially to the failure of governments to fulfil conditions relating to political and institutional reforms.
Den flerrige planlžgning bliver reglen efter Kommissionens forslag (meddelelse KOM(2001) 473). 
On a proposal from the Commission (communication COM(2001) 473), multiannual programming is now the rule.
Det skal dog noteres, at flerrige fżdevaresikkerhedsprogrammer, dvs. forslag til finansiering med kontering over budgettet over to eller tre p hinanden fżlgende r, har vžre indfżrt siden 1996. 
It should be noted, however, that multiannual food security programmes have been defined since 1996: proposal for financing, charged to the budget over two or three consecutive years.
Under kriser, hvor situationer er skrżbelig og nervżs (Palžstina, Nordkorea), kan en smidig planlžgning p rsbasis vžre en komparativ fordel med henblik p at opn hndgribelige resultater. 
However, where crises arise and the situation is fragile and volatile (Palestine, North Korea), flexible annual programming can be a relative advantage in order to achieve tangible results.
Generelt er komplementariteten EF-interventionerne fortsat en hjżrnesten i gennemfżrelsen, der dog afhžnger af forholdene i det pgžldende land. 
Generally speaking, the complementarity of Community measures is still a cornerstone of actual implementation, although it depends on the environment that exists in the country.
F.eks. tilsigtes der med finansieringen af programmerne for fżdevaresikkerhed i Bolivia at nedbringe srbarheden for fżdevaresituationen, hvilket er fuldstžndig komplementžrt med kontoen for ALA til stżtte af den regionale żkonomiske integration og forbedring af basisin-frastrukturerne (drikkevand og sanering). 
For example, the financing of food security programmes in Bolivia is directed towards reducing food vulnerability and fully supplements the ALA line of aid for regional economic integration and the improvement of basic infrastructures (drinking water and sanitation).
Budgettet p kontoen vedrżrende fżdevaresikkerhed tegner sig for ca. 50 % af samarbejdet mellem EF og Bolivia. 
The budget for the food security line accounts for some 50 % of Community cooperation in Bolivia.
Desuden kan Etiopien nžvnes, hvor EUFŐs supplerende finansiering inden for fżdevaresikkerheden er fastlagt i landestrategipapi-ret. 
Another example is Ethiopia, where additional EDF financing for food security is provided for in the country strategy paper (CSP).
Den spredning, som Revisionsrettens beretning nžvner, skyldes ofte, at kun en budgetkonto kan anvendes i ikkeprioriterede lande med ofte skrżbelige institutioner, og den bruges derfor til mange forskellige behov, som det kan vžre vanskeligt at indkredse. 
The ÔdispersionŐ to which the CourtŐs report refers is due to the fact that the budget heading is frequently the only one that can be implemented in non-priority countries with fragile institutions, so that it has to cope with a multitude of needs that are often difficult to identify precisely.