natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der bżr vžre overensstemmelse med andre EU-ml Inputtene i den fžlles landbrugspolitik Tildelingen af midler er ikke i tilstržkkelig grad baseret p behovene eller den forventede EU-mervžrdi Processerne i den fžlles landbrugspolitik Det vil kržve bedre og hurtigere information at udforme omkostningseffektive instrumenter under den fžlles landbrugspolitik Sikring af sammenhžng mellem den fžlles landbrugspolitik og andre EU-politikker og mellem forskellige instrumenter under den fžlles landbrugspolitik Der er behov for forenkling, men ikke p bekostning af effektiviteten Der skal afsžttes tilstržkkelig tid til at gennemfżre den nžste reform af den fžlles landbrugspolitik Output, udfald og eksterne faktorer i den fžlles landbrugspolitik Der er behov for et effektivt performancesystem, der forbinder output, resultater, effekt og ml Sammenhžng mellem de udbetalte midler og opnelsen af de aftalte performanceml Politikken bżr overvges - og justeres, nr det er nżdvendigt Ansvarlighed for den fžlles landbrugspolitik Kriterier til vurdering af den fremtidige politik - med forklaringer Bilag I - Liste over publikationer fra Revisionsretten, der ligger til grund for dette briefingpapir Bilag II - Traktatens ml for den fžlles landbrugspolitik 29-30 31-34 31-34 35-42 35-37 38-40 41 42 43-48 43-46 47 48 49 50-66 3 
CAP Inputs The allocation of funds is not sufficiently based on needs or expected EU value added CAP Processes Better and quicker information needed to design cost-effective CAP instruments Achieving consistency between the CAP and other EU policies and between different CAP instruments Simplification needed, but not at the cost of effectiveness Sufficient time must be allowed to roll out the next CAP reform CAP outputs, outcomes and external factors Need for an effective performance system linking outputs, results, impacts and objectives Link between money paid and achievement of agreed performance targets Policy should be monitored and – when necessary – adjusted Accountability for the CAP Criteria and implications for assessing future policy Annex I – List of ECA publications supporting this briefing paper Annex II – Treaty CAP objectives 31-34 31-34 35-42 35-37 38-40 41 42 43-48 43-46 47 48 49 50-66 3
RESUM I. EU's fžlles landbrugspolitik skal revideres, fordi den aktuelle syvrige planlžgningsperiode for EU's finanser og politikgennemfżrelse udlżber i 2020. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is up for review, as the current seven-year planning period for EU finances and policy implementation ends in 2020.
I november 2017 offentliggjorde Kommissionen en meddelelse om fremtiden for fżdevarer og landbrug, som pržsenterer dens overvejelser om den fžlles landbrugspolitik efter 2020. 
In November 2017 the Commission published a Communication on the future of food and farming, which presents its thinking on the post-2020 CAP.
Dette briefingpapir er vores reaktion p Kommissionens meddelelse. 
This briefing paper is our response to the Commission’s Communication.
I dette dokument analyserer vi de vigtigste tendenser og data med relevans for landbruget og landdistrikterne, pržsenterer vores synspunkter vedrżrende den nuvžrende fžlles landbrugspolitik og drżfter kriterier og centrale udfordringer for den nye fžlles landbrugspolitik. 
In this document we analyse key trends and data relevant to agriculture and rural areas, present our views on the current CAP, and discuss criteria and key challenges for the new CAP.
Meddelelsen tager hensyn til en ržkke af de anbefalinger, Revisionsretten har fremsat over en rržkke. 
The Communication takes into account a number of recommendations the ECA has made over several years.
Den beskriver en ambition om at levere en ny, resultatbaseret ramme. 
It sets out an ambition to deliver a new performance-based framework.
Vi bemžrker imidlertid, at nogle af de statistikker, der ligger til grund for meddelelsen, ikke opfylder de kriterier, vi har fastlagt i tidligere revisionsberetninger, og at meddelelsen giver anledning til at formode, at de stżttede foranstaltninger i fremtiden sandsynligvis vil ligne dem, der tidligere er blevet stżttet. 
However we note that some of the statistics underlying the Communication do not meet the criteria we have set out in previous reports, and that the measures supported are, on the basis of the Communication, likely to be similar to those supported in the past.
Et nżgleelement i meddelelsen er dens anbefaling af "ny gennemfżrelsesmodel", som bygger p stżrre fleksibilitet, udvidet anvendelse af nžrhedsprincippet, og at medlemsstaterne fr et stżrre ansvar for performance. 
A key element of the Communication is advocacy of a “new delivery model” – based on increased flexibility and subsidiarity and giving Member States more responsibility for performance.
Efter vores mening vil en vellykket anvendelse af den nye gennemfżrelsesmodel kržve: Ľ at der udformes foranstaltninger p grundlag af solid videnskabelig og statistisk dokumentation, der viser, at de vil levere de żnskede resultater Ľ at de nye "strategiske planer under den fžlles landbrugspolitik" fastsžtter relevante, ambitiżse og verificerbare ml, der er i overensstemmelse med EU-mlene Ľ at der findes en stžrk ramme til overvgning og evaluering af performance Ľ at der findes en solid ansvarligheds-og revisionskžde, der giver sikkerhed med hensyn til bde overholdelse og performance. 
In our view, the success of the new delivery model requires: • Measures designed on the basis of solid scientific and statistical evidence demonstrating that they will deliver desired results; • The new “CAP strategic plans” setting relevant, ambitious and verifiable targets that are aligned with EU objectives; • A robust performance monitoring and evaluation framework; and • A solid accountability and audit chain providing assurance on both compliance and performance.
V. Kommissionens meddelelse er ikke et lovforslag. 
V. The Commission’s Communication does not represent a proposal.
De kriterier, vi fremsžtter i dette briefingpapir, vil danne grundlag for vores fremtidige gennemgang af Kommissionens lovforslag, nr dette er offentliggjort. 
The criteria set out in this briefing paper will inform our future review of the Commission’s proposal when that is published.
Vi forventer, at vores gennemgang vil fżre til en udtalelse om det endelige forslag. 5 
We envisage that the review will then lead to an opinion on the final proposal. 4
INDLEDNING Emne og forml 1. 
INTRODUCTION Topic and purpose 1.
EU's fžlles landbrugspolitik skal revideres, fordi den aktuelle syvrige planlžgningsperiode for EU's finanser og politikgennemfżrelse udlżber i 2020. 
The EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is up for review, as the current seven-year planning period for EU finances and policy implementation ends in 2020.
Kommissionen agter i maj 2018 at fremlžgge sit lovforslag vedrżrende den kommende fžlles landbrugspolitik sammen med en konsekvensanalyse. 
The Commission intends to present its legislative proposal for the next CAP together with an impact assessment in May 2018.
Et vigtigt skridt i forberedelserne til reformen af den fžlles landbrugspolitik med henblik p perioden efter 2020 blev taget i november 2017, da Kommissionen offentliggjorde en meddelelse om fremtiden for fżdevarer og landbrug1. 
A key step in preparing the CAP reform for the period after 2020 came in November 2017, when the Commission published a Communication on the future of food and farming1.
Da Kommissionen oplyste, at den ville udsende denne meddelelse, gjorde vi det til en hżjt prioriteret opgave i vores arbejdsprogram for 2018 at reagere p den. 
When the Commission announced its intention to issue the communication, we planned a high priority task to react to it in our 2018 Work Programme.
Den 6. december 2017 modtog vi en udtrykkelig anmodning om en sdan reaktion fra den ansvarlige kommissžr, Phil Hogan. 
On 6 December 2017, we also received a request for such a reaction from the Commissioner responsible, Mr Hogan.
Meddelelsen fokuserer p: Ľ at viderefżre den direkte stżtte til landbrugere, men med stżrre brug af risikostyringsvžrktżjer og initiativer til at żge landbrugernes markedsbelżnninger Ľ at sikre stżrre bidrag til opfyldelsen af EU's miljż-og klimamlsžtninger Ľ at tage hżjde for den "sociożkonomiske struktur" i landomrderne Ľ at sikre mere opmžrksomhed p bžredygtig landbrugsproduktion, sundhed, ernžring, fżdevarespild og dyrevelfžrd Ľ at sikre bedre brug af forskning, innovation og teknologi samt finansielle instrumenter COM(2017) 713 final: Meddelelse fra Kommissionen til Europa-Parlamentet, Rdet, Det Europžiske Żkonomiske og Sociale Udvalg og Regionsudvalget - Fremtiden for fżdevarer og landbrug. 6 1 
The Communication focuses on: • continuation of direct support to farmers, but with greater use of risk management tools and initiatives to increase farmers’ market rewards; • contributing more to EU environmental and climate objectives; • attention to the “socio-economic fabric” of rural areas; • greater focus on sustainable agricultural production, health, nutrition, food waste and animal welfare; • better use of research, innovation and technology, and financial instruments; and • a new delivery model based on greater flexibility and subsidiarity – giving Member States more responsibility for performance.
Vi har som Den Europžiske Unions eksterne revisor ikke til opgave at udforme den fremtidige politik. 
It is not our role, as the external auditor of the European Union (EU), to design the future policy.
P grundlag af vores revisionserfaring kan vi imidlertid tilbyde EU's politiske beslutningstagere rdgivning om, hvordan ansvarligheden og den samlede effektivitet og produktivitet kan forbedres i forbindelse med den fžlles landbrugspolitik. 
However, drawing on our audit experience, we can offer advice to EU policymakers COM(2017) 713 final : Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – The Future of Food and Farming.
Det er formlet med dette dokument, som er vores reaktion p Kommissionens meddelelse om fremtiden for fżdevarer og landbrug. 
This is the purpose of this paper, which is our response to the Commission’s Communication on the future of food and farming.
Dette briefingpapir er ikke en revisionsberetning. 
This is not an audit report.
Det er en analyse baseret p offentligt tilgžngelige oplysninger. 
It is a review based on publicly available information.
Metode og pržsentation 5. 
Approach and presentation 5.
De synspunkter, vi giver udtryk for i dette briefingpapir2, er baseret p: Ľ vores tidligere arbejde Ľ analyser af eksterne rapporter og hżring af eksterne eksperter Ľ drżftelser med de relevante generaldirektorater i Kommissionen3. 
Our views expressed in this briefing paper2 are based on: • our previous work; • reviews of external reports and consultation with external experts; • discussions with the relevant Directorates-General of the Commission3.
I dette briefingpapir pržsenterer vi: Ľ de vigtigste data og tendenser med relevans for landbruget og landdistrikterne Ľ vores synspunkter vedrżrende den nuvžrende fžlles landbrugspolitik Et briefingpapir er et analysebaseret produkt, ikke et revisionsbaseret produkt. 
In this briefing paper, we present: • key data and trends relevant to the farming sector and rural areas; • our views on the current CAP; • conclusions, including a set of criteria for assessing the CAP legislative proposal and the resulting future policy, and key challenges for the post-2020 CAP.
Det er sledes ikke udarbejdet p grundlag af nyt revisionsarbejde, men baseret p offentliggjorte revisionsresultater, konklusioner og anbefalinger samt andre offentligt tilgžngelige oplysninger. 
As such, it does not involve new audit work, but is based on published audit findings, conclusions and recommendations, and other publicly available information.
Bilag I indeholder en fuldstžndig liste over dem af vores egne publikationer, som vi henviser til i dette papir. 
Annex I provides a full list of our publications referred to in this paper.
Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug og Udvikling af Landdistrikter, Generaldirektoratet for Klima, Generaldirektoratet for Miljż, Eurostat, Generaldirektoratet for Regionalpolitik og Bypolitik og Generaldirektoratet for Sundhed og Fżdevaresikkerhed. 
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Directorate-General for Climate Action, Directorate-General for Environment, Eurostat, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety.
72 % af budgettet for den fžlles landbrugspolitik bruges p direkte betalinger til landbrugerne og stżtter dermed deres indkomst. 
Around 72 % of the CAP budget is spent on direct payments to farmers, and so supports their incomes.
Disse betalinger er generelt baseret p antallet af hektar landbrugsjord, for det meste uden tilknytning til produktionen og kun med et begržnset fald i stżtten pr. hektar, jo stżrre bedrifterne er. 
These payments are generally paid per hectare of agricultural land, for the most part without a link to production, and with little decrease in support paid per hectare as farm size increases.
Ca. 22 % bruges p foranstaltninger til udvikling af landdistrikterne, og halvdelen af disse midler udbetales ogs 
Around 22 % is spent on rural development measures, half of which are also paid to farmers on a per hectare basis.
De resterende midler (6 %) finansierer markedsforanstaltninger. 
The remainder (6 %) funds market measures.
Fžrre men stżrre bedrifter (og en mindre arbejdsstyrke) producerer output af en konstant vžrdi, hvilket fżrer til stżrre indkomst pr. fuldtidsbeskžftiget 9. 
Fewer but larger farms (and a smaller workforce) produce a constant value of outputs, leading to increased incomes per full-time person 9.
Ifżlge Eurostats undersżgelse af landbrugsbedrifternes struktur var der i 2013 10,8 millioner bedrifter i EU, hvilket var 22 % mindre end de 13,8 millioner bedrifter, der var registreret i 2007. 
According to Eurostat’s Farm Structure Survey, in 2013 there were 10.8 million farms in the EU, a 22 % decrease compared to the 13.8 million farms registered in 2007.
Deres gennemsnitlige stżrrelse var steget med 28 % fra 12,6 ha til 16,1 ha. 
Their average size increased by 28 % from 12.6 ha to 16.1 ha.
Der var et parallelt fald (p 25 %) i landbrugets arbejdsstyrke fra 12,8 millioner fuldtidsžkvivalenter i 2005 til 9,5 millioner i 2017, hvilket hovedsagelig gžlder ulżnnet arbejde udfżrt af bedriftsledere4 og deres familier. 
There was a parallel decrease (by 25 %) in the agricultural workforce from 12.8 million full-time job equivalents in 2005 to 9.5 million in 2017, principally concerning non-salaried work by farm managers4 and their families.
En gennemsnitlig bedrift giver sledes arbejde til mindre end n fuldtidsbeskžftiget (to tredjedele af de stżttemodtagere under den fžlles landbrugspolitik, der har de mindste bedrifter, bruger under en fjerdedel af deres arbejdstid p deres jord - jf. ogs tekstboks 1). 
Thus an average farm provides work for less than one full-time person (two-thirds of the CAP beneficiaries for the smallest farms spend less than a quarter of their working Farm manager is defined by the Eurostat as “the natural person responsible for the normal daily financial and production routines of running an agricultural holding.
Vžrdien af landbrugsproduktionen svingede, men mlt realt forblev den nogenlunde p samme niveau. 
The value of agricultural production fluctuated but remained broadly at the same level in real terms.
Selv om resultaterne for de forskellige sektorer varierer meget, har dette samlet set resulteret i en betydelig stigning i indkomsten fra landbrugsvirksomhed pr. fuldtidsbeskžftiget (jf. figur 2). 
While the performance of different sectors varies widely, overall this resulted in a significant increase in income from farming per full-time person (see Figure 2).
Somme tider er bedriftslederen ogs bedriftens ejer, men bedriftsleder kan ogs vžre en anden person end ejeren. Figur 2 - Vžrdien af landbrugets output var stabil, og arbejdsstyrken i landbruget blev mindre, s den gennemsnitlige indkomst pr. heltidsbeskžftiget steg Kilde: Revisionsretten, baseret p data fra Europa-Kommissionen (skżnsbaserede data for 2017). 
Figure 2 – As the value of agricultural outputs was stable and the agricultural workforce decreased, the average income per full-time person increased 8 123.5 119.8 100.6 100.9 92.0 79.5 Real income of factors in agriculture per annual work unit (Indicator A), Index 2010=100 Agricultural goods output, production value at basic prices, real prices Index, 2010=100 Total labour force input Index 2010=100 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source: ECA, based on European Commission data (2017 data based on estimates).
Ifżlge OECD udgjorde den offentlige stżtte fra EU 21 % af bedrifternes bruttoindtžgt i 2016 - en nedgang fra 24 % i 2007 og 33 % i 20005. 
According to the OECD, the share of EU public support in gross farm receipts was 21 % in 2016, down from 24 % in 2007 and 33 % in 20005.
10 130 120 110 100 90 Indeks 2010=100 80 70 123,5 119,8 100,6 100,9 92,0 79,5 Real faktorindkomst i landbruget pr. rsarbejdsenhed (indikator A) Indeks 2010=100 Vareproduktion i landbruget, produktionsvžrdi i basispriser, realpriser Indeks 2010=100 Samlet arbejdskraftinput 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 5 OECD: "Agricultural Policy Indicators 2017 - Monitoring and evaluation: Reference tables" (fuldstžndigt datasžt) http://stats.oecd.org/viewhtml.aspx?QueryId=77872&vh=0000&vf=0&l&il=&lang=en 
5 OECD: Agricultural Policy Indicators 2017 – Monitoring and evaluation: Reference tables (full dataset) http://stats.oecd.org/viewhtml.aspx?QueryId=77872&vh=0000&vf=0&l&il=&lang=en
EU-fżdevarepriserne har nžrmet sig priserne p verdensmarkedet, og EU er blevet nettoeksportżr af fżdevarer 11. 
EU food prices have converged with world prices and the EU has become a net exporter of food 11.
EU producerer flere fżdevarer, end det forbruger, og er blevet nettoeksportżr af fżdevarer (jf. figur 3). 
The EU produces more food than it consumes, and has become a net food exporter (see Figure 3).
Samtidig har EU-priserne i vžsentlig grad nžrmet sig fżdevarepriserne p verdensmarkedet. 
At the same time, EU prices have converged significantly with world food prices.
Dette handelsoverskud skyldes hovedsagelig EU's stžrke position med hensyn til forarbejdede fżdevarer og drikkevarer. 
This trade surplus results principally from the EU’s strong position in processed food and beverages.
EU er imidlertid fortsat nettoimportżr af uforarbejdede landbrugsprodukter (betegnet "rvarer" og "andre uforarbejdede varer" i figur 3). 
However, the EU remains a net importer of unprocessed farm products (labelled as “commodities” and “other primary” in Figure 3).
Figur 3 - EU er blevet nettoeksportżr af fżdevarer Kilde: Comext - fakta og tal. 
Figure 3 – EU has become a net exporter of food Source: Comext – facts and figures.
Gennemsnitsalderen for bedriftsledere er steget, og der er uoverensstemmelser i dataene om arealanvendelse 12. 
The average age of farm managers has increased, and the land data are inconsistent 12.
I 2010 var der for hver 100 bedriftsledere p over 55 r 14 bedriftsledere p under 35 r. 
In 2010, for every 100 farm managers above 55, there were 14 farm managers below 35.
I 2013 var dette tal faldet til 10,8 bedriftsledere p under 35 r. 
In 2013 this value decreased to 10.8 farm managers below 35.
Gennemsnitsalderen for 11 millioner euro 150 000 100 000 50 000 0 50 000 100 000 150 000 EU-28: Sammensžtning af landbrugsfżdevarehandelen med lande uden for EU-28 -7 538 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Forarbejdede varer 2012 2013 2014 Tilberedte nžringsmidler Drikkevarer 2015 2016 2017 Ikkespiselige varer Balance 20 527 Rvarer Andre uforarbejdede varer Import Eksport 
The average age of EU 9 million euros 150 000 100 000 50 000 0 -7 538 2007 Commodities EU 28: Structure of Agri-food trade 2007-2017 with extra EU 28 20 527 50 000 100 000 150 000 2008 2009 Other primary 2010 2011 Processed 2012 Food preparations 2013 2014 2015 Beverages Non-edible 2016 2017 Balance Imports Exports
Vi bemžrker, at de mindste landbrugere i EU steg fra 49,2 til 51,4 r i perioden fra 2004 til 20136. 
farmers increased from 49.2 to 51.4 years over the period 2004 to 20136.
Dette er i bedrifter som oftest drives af žldre landbrugere7. 
This is in line with wider demographic trends.
Der er uoverensstemmelser i dataene om det samlede areal, der anvendes til landbrug. 
Data is inconsistent as regards the total area of land used for agriculture.
Ifżlge undersżgelsen af landbrugsbedrifternes struktur har det samlede areal, der er blevet anvendt til landbrug, vžret forholdsvis stabilt i flere rtier. 
According to the Farm Structure Survey, the total area of land used for agriculture has remained relatively stable over the decades.
Et lignende billede tegner sig i Kommissionens data om de arealer, der er blevet anmeldt med henblik p direkte betalinger under den fžlles landbrugspolitik. 
A similar picture emerges from the Commission data on the areas declared for CAP direct payments.
Der kan imidlertid ses en anden tendens (et fald p 11,5 % i det anmeldte landbrugsareal) i de data fra Kommissionen, der ligger til grund for rapporteringen om andelen af permanente gržsarealer (jf. sžrberetning nr. 21/2017). 
However, a different trend (an 11.5 % decrease in the agricultural land declared) emerged from the Commission data underlying permanent grassland ratio reporting (see SR 21/2017).
Afgrżdestatistikken viser et fald p 4 % fra 186,6 millioner hektar i 2006 til 178,8 millioner hektar i 2015. 
Crop statistics show a 4 % decline from 186.6 million hectares in 2006 to 178.8 million hectares in 2015.
Andre vžsentlige žndringer pvirker arealfordelingen mellem de forskellige typer landbrugsproduktion8. 
More significant changes affect land allocation between different types of agricultural production8.
Utilstržkkelige fremskridt med hensyn til miljżbeskyttelse og klimaindsats 14. 
Insufficient progress on environmental care and climate action 14.
Miljżspżrgsmlene i forbindelse med landbrug er centreret omkring fire hovedemner9: I USA steg gennemsnitsalderen for bedriftsledere endnu mere i samme periode (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/015_en.pdf). 
The average age of principal operator in the US has increased even more during the same period (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/015_en.pdf).
Kontekstindikator C.23 for den fžlles landbrugspolitik (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-indicators/context/2017_en); https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/09_en.pdf Eurostats undersżgelse af landbrugsbedrifternes struktur (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/farm-structure) og afgrżdestatistik (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/data/database). 
CAP context indicator C.23 (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-indicators/context/2017_en); https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/09_en.pdf Eurostat’s Farm Structure Survey (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/farm-structure) and crop statistics (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/data/database).