natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kontekstindikator C.35, C 40, C.41 og C.45 for den fžlles landbrugspolitik (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-indicators/context/2017_en), JRC (2012) -"State of Soil in Europe" (http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ESDB_Archive/eusoils_docs/other/EUR25186.pdf), EEA (2015) - "State of the Nature in the EU" (https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu), DG AGRI - "Facts and figures on EU agriculture and the CAP" (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/statistics/facts-and-figures_en). 
CAP context indicators C.35, C 40, C.41, C.45 (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-indicators/context/2017_en); JRC (2012) State of Soil in Europe (http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ESDB_Archive/eusoils_docs/other/EUR25186.pdf); EEA (2015) State of the Nature in the EU (https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu); DG AGRI, Facts and figures on EU agriculture and the CAP (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/statistics/facts-and-figures_en).
Siden 1990 er bestandene af almindelige markfugle faldet med 30 %, og bestandene af sommerfugle i gržsomrder er faldet med nžsten 50 % ii) Vandkvalitet: Der er et vedvarende kvžlstofoverskud p landbrugsjorden i EU, gennemsnitlig 50 kg kvžlstof/ha. 
(ii) Water quality: There is a persistent nitrogen surplus on EU farmland, averaging 50 kg nitrogen/ha.
Siden 1993 er nitratniveauerne faldet i floderne, men ikke i grundvandet. 
Since 1993, levels of nitrates have decreased in rivers, but not in groundwater.
Nitratkoncentrationerne er stadig hżje i nogle omrder, hvilket fżrer til forurening i mange sżer og floder, primžrt i regioner med intensivt landbrug iii) Luft: Ammoniak er et vžsentligt luftforurenende stof. 
Nitrate concentrations are still high in some areas, leading to pollution in many lakes and rivers, mainly in regions with intensive agriculture. (iii)Air: Ammonia is an important air pollutant.
Landbruget genererer nžsten 95 % af ammoniakemissionerne i Europa. 
Farming generates almost 95 % of ammonia emissions in Europe.
Emissionerne er faldet med 23 % siden 1990, men begyndte at stige igen i 2012 iv) Jordbund: Ca. 45 % af mineraljorden i EU har et lavt eller meget lavt indhold af organisk kulstof (0-2 %), og 45 % har et moderat indhold (2-6 %). 
While emissions have decreased by 23 % since 1990, they started to increase again in 2012. (iv) Soil: Around 45 % of mineral soils in the EU have low or very low organic carbon content (0-2 %) and 45 % have a medium content (2-6 %).
Det er svžrt at fastsl jordbundstendenser, fordi der mangler data, men et faldende indhold af organisk kulstof bidrager til faldende jordfrugtbarhed og stżrre risici for żrkendannelse. 
Soil trends are difficult to establish due to data gaps, but declining levels of organic carbon content contribute to declining soil fertility, and increased risks of desertification.
Den primžre bekymring vedrżrende klimažndringer er drivhusgasemissionerne. 
The main concern regarding climate change is greenhouse gas emissions.
Drivhusgasemissionerne fra landbruget udgjorde 11 % af EU's drivhusgasemissioner i 2015. 
Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture accounted for 11 % of EU emissions in 2015.
Disse emissioner faldt med 20 % mellem 1990 og 2013, men begyndte at stige igen i 2014. 
These emissions decreased by 20 % between 1990 and 2013, but started to rise again in 2014.
Nettooptaget fra arealanvendelse, žndringer i arealanvendelse og skovbrug opvejede ca. 7 % af EU's samlede drivhusgasemissioner i 2015. 
Net removals from land use, land use change and forestry offset around 7 % of all EU greenhouse gas emissions in 2015.
Samtidig er landbruget sžrlig srbart over for klimažndringer, som er en af de faktorer, der bidrager til, at hvedeudbyttet stagnerer i dele af Europa trods fortsatte dyrkningsfremskridt. 
At the same time, agriculture is uniquely vulnerable to climate change, which is one factor contributing to the stagnation of wheat yields in parts of Europe, despite continued progress in crop breeding.
Landbruget tegner sig for over 50 % af ferskvandsanvendelsen i Europa. 
Agriculture accounts for more than 50 % of freshwater use in Europe.
Klimažndringer har medfżrt en stigning i den kunstige vanding10. 
Climate change has led to an increase in irrigation10.
EEA (2017): "Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016. 
Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016.
An indicator-based report". 
An indicator-based report.
EEA-rapport nr. 
EEA Report No 1/2017.
BNP pr. indbygger i landdistrikterne l i 2013 p 73 % af BNP pr. indbygger i żkonomien som helhed, hvilket var en stigning fra 70 % i 2008. 
economy as a whole, up from 70 % in 2008.
For EU som helhed er den gennemsnitlige beskžftigelsesfrekvens i landdistrikterne den samme som i andre omrder, men den varierer fra medlemsstat til medlemsstat. 
The EU average employment rate for rural areas is the same as for other areas, although rates differ between Member States.
Fattigdommen i landdistrikterne faldt fra 31,4 % i 2007 til 25,4 % i 2016. 
The poverty rate declined in rural areas from 31.4 % in 2007 to 25.4 % in 2016.
Landdistrikternes żkonomi er - ligesom żkonomien i stżrre og mindre byer - domineret af industrien og servicesektoren. 
The economy of rural areas – like that of towns and cities – is dominated by the industrial and service sectors.
De tegner sig (ifżlge Eurostat) tilsammen for 96 % af bruttovžrditilvžksten i landdistrikterne. 
Together (according to Eurostat), these represent 96 % of the gross value added generated in rural areas.
Landbrug, skovbrug og fiskeri tegner sig for 4 % af bruttovžrditilvžksten i landdistrikterne og 1,5 % af bruttovžrditilvžksten i den samlede żkonomi. 
Agriculture, forestry and fishery represents 4 % of the gross value added generated in rural areas, compared to 1.5 % in the whole economy.
Denne andel har vžret stabil i de sidste fem r. 
This share has been stable over the last five years.
VORES ANALYSE 19. 
OUR REVIEW 19.
Vi baserede vores analyse p Revisionsrettens programlogiske model (jf. figur 4), som beskriver, hvordan der i forbindelse med en offentlig intervention kan sikres sparsommelighed, produktivitet og effektivitet. 
We structured our review around the ECA programme logic model (see Figure 4), which sets out how public intervention can achieve economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
De punkter, der fremhžves i de enkelte sektioner, er eksempler p problemer, som vi har konstateret tidligere, og som bżr overvejes i forbindelse med udformningen af den fžlles landbrugspolitik efter 2020. 
The points raised in each section serve as examples of problems which we have identified in the past and which should be considered when designing the post-2020 CAP.
Nr Kommissionen i meddelelsen kan anfżre, at 55 % af EU's borgere bor i landdistrikter, skyldes det, at den slr de "overvejende landlige regioner" sammen med "mellemregionerne". 
12 practice which we followed in our paper. The claim, made in the Communication, that 55 % of EU population live in rural areas, results from merging “predominantly rural” regions with “intermediate” regions.
"Mellemregionerne" kunne lige s godt sls sammen med de "overvejende bymžssige regioner" og fżre til en modstridende pstand om, at 80 % af EU's befolkning bor i bymžssige regioner. 
“Intermediate” regions could just as well be grouped together with “predominantly urban” regions, leading to a conflicting claim that 80 % of EU population live in urban regions.
Utilstržkkelige oplysninger til identificering af behov 20. 
Insufficient information to identify needs 20.
I forbindelse med flere foranstaltninger under den fžlles landbrugspolitik bżr der fremlžgges bedre information, som begrunder behovet for dem12. 
Better information is required to justify the need for several CAP measures12.
Det gžlder navnlig den indkomststżtte i form af direkte betalinger, der i żjeblikket tager mere end 70 % af budgettet for den fžlles landbrugspolitik. 
This is the case, in particular, for income support through direct payments, which currently consume more than 70 % of the CAP budget.
Artikel 39 i traktaten fastsžtter, at den fžlles landbrugspolitik har som ml "at forżge landbrugets produktivitet [...] herigennem at sikre landbrugsbefolkningen en rimelig levestandard, isžr ved en forhżjelse af de individuelle indkomster for de i landbruget beskžftigede personer" (jf. bilag II). 
Article 39 of the Treaty stipulates that the objective of the CAP is “to increase agricultural productivity (...) thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture” (see Annex II).
Ordet "herigennem" forbinder de to ml for den fžlles landbrugspolitik. 
The word “thus” links the two CAP objectives.
Landbrugernes indkomst og deres familiers levestandard blev oprindelig sikret ved at fastsžtte hżjere priser, som blev betalt af forbrugerne. 
Farmers’ earnings, and the living standard of their families were addressed initially through higher prices borne by consumers.
Gradvis gik man over til at yde direkte indkomststżtte, som finansieres af skatteyderne. 
This gradually moved to direct income support funded by taxpayers.
Selv om traktatens ml om at sikre landbrugsbefolkningen en rimelig levestandard betragtes isoleret, er der ikke data nok til at underbygge pstanden om, at landbrugshusholdningerne som helhed har behov for betydelig stżtte, hvis de skal opn en rimelig levestandard. 
Even if the Treaty objective of ensuring a fair standard of living of the agricultural community is considered in isolation, there is not enough data to support the claim that farm households, taken as a whole, need significant support to achieve a fair standard of living.
Kommissionen siger, at der er en betydelig forskel mellem det, landbrugerne tjener ved at arbejde p deres bedrift, og de gennemsnitlige lżnninger i żkonomien som helhed. 
The Commission argues that there is a considerable gap between what farmers gain for their work on the farm and what average wages and salaries are in the economy as a whole.
De data, der fremlžgges af Kommissionen13, er imidlertid behžftet med to vžsentlige begržnsninger: i) Indtžgtskilder uden for landbruget er ikke medregnet (jf. tekstboks 1), og ii) gennemsnittene džkker over en stor variation i indkomstsituation14. 
However, the data presented by the Commission13 is affected by two significant limitations: (i) income sources outside farming are not included (see Box 1) and (ii) the averages mask a great variability of the income situation 14.
Matthews, A. 
14 12 13 14 Matthews, A.
(2017), "Appendix 1: Why further reform?" (s. 29-30) i Buckwell, A. et al. 
(2017), “Appendix 1: Why further reform?” (pp. 29–30) in Buckwell, A. et al. 2017.
2017: "CAP - Thinking Out of the Box: Further modernisation of the CAP - why, what and how?" 
CAP - Thinking Out of the Box: Further modernisation of the CAP – why, what and how?
RISE Foundation, Bruxelles. 
RISE Foundation, Brussels.
Figur 6 i meddelelsen om fremtiden for fżdevarer og landbrug. 
Figure 6 of the Communication on the Future of Food and Farming.
GD AGRI, "Facts and figures on EU agriculture and the CAP" (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/statistics/facts-and-figures_en). 
DG AGRI, Facts and figures on EU agriculture and the CAP (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/statistics/facts-and-figures_en).
17 Tekstboks 1 - Indtžgtskilder uden for landbruget Ifżlge Eurostat udżver ca. 30 % af bedriftslederne indtžgtsgivende virksomhed uden for landbruget, og andelen forventes at vžre hżjere for deres žgtefžller og andre husstandsmedlemmer. 
15 Box 1 - Income sources other than farming According to Eurostat, the share of farm managers with gainful activities outside farming is around 30 % and is likely to be higher for their spouses and other household members.
GD AGRI har tidligere offentliggjort data15, som viser, at over 60 % af de bedriftsledere, hvis bedrifter er p under 5 ha, tilbringer under 25 % af deres tid p bedrifterne, og at ca. 80 % af dem tilbringer under halvdelen af deres arbejdsliv p bedrifterne. 
DG AGRI has previously published data15 indicating that more than 60 % of farm managers on farms of less than 5 ha spend less than 25 % of their time on their holdings and that around 80 % spend less than half their working lives on their holding.
Fżrst nr bedriftsstżrrelsen overstiger 20 ha er antallet af fuldtidsbedriftsledere hżjere end antallet af bedriftsledere, der bruger under 50 % af deres arbejdstid p bedrifterne. 
Only when farm size exceeds 20 ha do full-time managers outnumber those who spend less than 50 % of their working time on their holding.
Mange stżttemodtagere under den fžlles landbrugspolitik modtager ogs pensioner. 
Many CAP beneficiaries also receive pensions.
De tal, Kommissionen fremlžgger, omfatter ikke indtžgtskilder uden for landbruget. 
The figures presented by the Commission exclude sources of income outside farming.
I en undersżgelse fra Europa-Parlamentet om landbrugshusholdningernes indkomst16 anfżres det, at EU p nuvžrende tidspunkt ikke har et statistisk system, der kan give oplysninger om landbrugsbefolkningens levestandard. 
According to a European Parliament study on farm household incomes16: “There is currently no EU statistical system that is capable of providing information on the living standards of the agricultural community”.
Vi har gentagne gange opfordret til, at der udarbejdes sdanne data, s de kan bruges i forbindelse med udformningen af de politikker, der skal sikre landbrugsbefolkningen en rimelig levestandard. 
We have called repeatedly for this data to be produced to inform policy aimed at ensuring a fair standard of living of the agricultural community.
I nogle medlemsstater foreligger der data om landbrugshusholdningernes indkomst fra alle kilder, og de tyder p, at sdanne husholdninger ikke nżdvendigvis er drligere stillet end andre husholdninger. 
Data on farm household incomes from all sources are available for some Member States and suggests that such households are not necessarily worse off than other households.
Landbrugsindkomsten er hżjere (ogs pr. arbejdsenhed) for stżrre bedrifter17. 
Farm incomes are higher (also per labour unit) for bigger farms17.
Ved beregningen af indkomstforskellen mellem landbruget og żkonomien som helhed medtager Kommissionen alle EU's 10,8 millioner landbrugsbedrifter, hvoraf 7,2 millioner har under 5 hektar, og 6 millioner har en rlig standardproduktion p under 4 000 euro18. 
In calculating the income gap between farming and the economy as a whole, the Commission includes all 10.8 million EU agricultural holdings, including 7.2 million with less than 5 hectares, and 6 million with annual standard output below €4 00018.
Det store antal af disse meget sm bedrifter, som ofte har iboende rentabilitetsudfordringer, fordrejer https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/09_en.pdf Hill, B. & Dylan Bradley, B. 
The income situation of medium size farms between 5 and 250 hectares, which, according to the Commission, receive 72 % of EU direct support, is better. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/09_en.pdf Hill, B. & Dylan Bradley, B.
(2015) "Comparison of farmers' income in the EU Member States". 
(2015) Comparison of farmers’ income in the EU Member States.
Rapport udarbejdet for Europa-Parlamentet. Denne korrelation fremgr tydeligst, hvis bedriftsstżrrelsen mles efter produktionens vžrdi. 
Report prepared for the European Parliament This correlation is stronger if size is expressed in terms of output values.
Fysisk stżrrelse er en ringere indikator for indkomstniveauer, fordi mange af de mindre rentable, ekstensive bedrifter er store, mens mange rentable, intensive bedrifter, navnlig med produktion af kżd og grżntsager, er relativt sm mlt i hektar. 
Physical size is a worse indicator of income levels because many of the less profitable, extensive farms are large, while many profitable, intensive farms, especially in the meat and vegetable sectors, are relatively small in terms of hectares.
Disse to kategorier for de mindste bedrifter (mlt efter hhv. fysisk og żkonomisk stżrrelse) overlapper i hżj grad hinanden. 
These two categories of smallest farms (by physical and by economic size) largely overlap.
15 16 17 18 
15 16 17 18
Kommissionen siger, at de direkte betalinger ud over at sikre landbrugsbefolkningens levestandard ogs sikrer, at der er landbrugsaktivitet i alle dele af Unionen, herunder i omrder med naturbetingede begržnsninger (som ogs modtager indkomstbetalinger under politikken for udvikling af landdistrikter), med forskellige żkonomiske, miljżmžssige og sociale fordele, herunder levering af offentlige goder. 
In addition to addressing the standard of living for the agricultural community, the Commission argues that direct payments ensure there is agricultural activity in all parts of the Union including in areas with natural constraints (which also receive income payments under Rural Development Policy) with various economic, environmental and social associated benefits, including the delivery of public goods.
Gyldigheden af disse argumenter afhžnger af kvaliteten af de data, der ligger til grund for dem. 
The validity of these arguments depends on the solidity of the data supporting them.
Manglende klarhed om EU-mervžrdi 24. 
Lack of clarity on EU value added 24.
Kommissionen har foreslet, at EU-mervžrdi skal vžre et centralt ml i forbindelse med alle fremtidige EU-politikker19. 
Making EU value added a core objective is one of Commission’s proposals for all future EU policies19.
EU-mervžrdi forsts normalt som supplerende resultater opnet ved en EU-indsats, som ikke kunne vžre opnet ved en ukoordineret indsats p nationalt, regionalt eller lokalt plan. 
EU value added is usually understood as additional results delivered by EU action that could not have been achieved by uncoordinated action at national, regional or local level.
Der findes imidlertid ingen almindeligt accepteret definition p dette begreb. 
However, there is no commonly accepted definition for this concept.
At n til enighed om og anvende en sdan definition ville gavne den offentlige debat og beslutningstagningen vedrżrende EU's fremtidige udgifter. 
Agreeing on and applying such a definition would benefit public debate and decision-making on future EU spending.
Reaktion p langsigtede tendenser 25. 
Responding to long-term trends 25.
Under den nuvžrende ordning fremsžttes forslaget til den nžste flerrige finansielle ramme (og forslagene vedrżrende alle store politikomrder, herunder den fžlles landbrugspolitik) to r fżr ikrafttrždelsen, og betalingerne under de flerrige programmer (f.eks. under anden sżjle i den fžlles landbrugspolitik) fortsžtter de fżrste tre r i den efterfżlgende flerrige finansielle ramme. 
Under the current arrangements the proposal for the next multiannual financial framework (and for all major policy areas, including the CAP) is made two years before its start and payments for multiannual programmes (such as those under Pillar 2 of the CAP) continue for the first three years of the following multiannual financial framework.
Det betyder, at de politiske beslutninger gžlder betalinger, der afholdes op til 12 r senere. 
This means that policy decisions will cover payments made up to 12 years later.
Der skal derfor tages hżjde for de langsigtede udviklinger, som politikken skal interagere med. 
Account therefore needs to be taken of long-term developments with which the policy will interact.
Den fžlles landbrugspolitiks indvirkning p rimeligheden og det indre marked 26. 
The CAP’s impact on fairness and the single market 26.
Fordi de direkte betalinger er knyttet til bedriftsarealet, gr hovedparten af dem til de stżrste bedrifter (ca. 80 % af stżtten ydes til 20 % af stżttemodtagerne). 
Due to their link to farm area, the largest share of direct payments go to the largest farms (with around 80 % of the support received by 20 % of beneficiaries).
De forskellige omfordelingsmekanismer, der hidtil er blevet anvendt (f.eks. lofter og omfordelingsbetalinger), har kun haft begržnset effekt. 
Various redistributive mechanisms used so far (e.g. capping and redistributive payments) have had a limited effect.
Overgangen til at sikre konvergens mellem hektarsatserne, bde mellem og (i forbindelse med grundbetalingsordningen) i medlemsstaterne, kan forhżje betalingerne til nogle af de store bedrifter. 
The move to converge rates per hectare, both between and (in the case of the basic payment scheme) within Member States can increase payments to some larger farms.
Nogle af de medlemsstater, der anvender grundbetalingsordningen, har benyttet sig af muligheden for at fastholde en hżj stżtte p grundlag af tidligere stżtteniveauer. 
Some Member States applying the basic payment scheme have also used the option to preserve high support levels resulting from past levels of subsidy.
Betalingsniveauerne kan derfor svinge betydeligt fra medlemsstat til medlemsstat. 
Payment levels between Member States can therefore vary significantly.
Betalingerne pr. hektar kan variere fra under 100 euro til over 1 000 euro. 
Payments per hectare can range from below €100 to over €1 000.
Mlene for den fžlles landbrugspolitik 19 Hvad Kommissionens meddelelse siger om ml: Ľ Den fžlles landbrugspolitiks tre ml er: o at fremme en "intelligent og modstandsdygtig" landbrugssektor o at styrke miljżbeskyttelsen og klimaindsatsen og bidrage til opfyldelsen af EU's miljż-og klimamlsžtninger o at styrke den sociożkonomiske struktur i landomrderne. Ľ Der bżr sikres overholdelse af forpligtelserne i henhold til Parisaftalen om klimaet, som blev vedtaget af partskonferencen inden for De Forenede Nationers rammekonvention om klimažndringer, og i henhold til FN's ml for bžredygtig udvikling. Ľ Der bżr ydes et rimeligt bidrag til at n EU's klima-og energiml for 2030. 
CAP Objectives 17 What the Commission’s Communication says on objectives: • The three CAP objectives are: o to foster a “smart and resilient” agricultural sector; o to bolster environmental care and climate action and to contribute to the environmental and climate objectives of the EU; o to strengthen the socio-economic fabric of rural areas. • Need for consistency with commitments under the Paris Agreement on climate, agreed by the Conference of the Parties within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Sustainable Development Goals. • Fair contribution to EU 2030 Climate and Energy targets. • The Commission would assess and approve CAP strategic plans and so maximise the CAP’s contribution to EU priorities and objectives and Member States’ climate and energy targets. • The CAP should lead a transition towards a more sustainable agriculture.
Med henblik p den fžlles landbrugspolitik efter 2020 er Kommissionens fortolkning af traktatens ml stort set i overensstemmelse med mlene for den fžlles landbrugspolitik i indevžrende periode (jf. bilag II). 
The Communication’s post-2020 CAP interpretation of Treaty objectives is broadly in line with the CAP objectives for the current period (see Annex II).
Mlene er ikke klare og specifikke nok 28. 
Insufficient clarity and specificity of objectives 28.
Der bżr s vidt muligt opstilles kvantificerede ml, ikke kun for output, men ogs for resultater og effekt20. 
Objectives should be quantified where possible, not just for outputs, but also results and impacts20.
Der bżr vžre overensstemmelse med andre EU-ml 29. 
Need for consistency with other EU objectives 29.
EU's politikker džkker mange forskellige emner, omrder og sektorer. 
EU policies cover many different issues, areas and sectors.
Den fžlles landbrugspolitiks ml bżr vžre i overensstemmelse med mlene for andre politikker (herunder samhżrigheds-, klima-og miljżpolitikken). 
The CAP’s objectives should be consistent with those of other policies (including cohesion, climate action and environmental protection).
Nr det er relevant, bżr den fžlles landbrugspolitiks bidrag til at opfylde andre EU-ml defineres. 
Where relevant, the CAPs contribution to achieving other EU objectives should be defined.