natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Landbrugsregnskaberne (LR) 73. 
The Economic Accounts for Agriculture (EAA) 73.
Det fżrste overslag over landbrugsregnskaberne blev offentliggjort fżr afslutningen af det regnskabsr, som beretningen omhandler, s en af de store fordele ved LR er, at der hurtigt foreligger resultater. 
As the first estimate for the EAA is published before the end of the reporting year, one of its great advantages is that it provides results that are available quickly.
De indkomstaggregater og -indikatorer, der anvendes i forbindelse med LR, er imidlertid hverken indikatorer for landbrugernes samlede indkomst eller for deres disponible indkomst, eftersom landbrugerne ogs kan have andre indkomstkilder end landbrugsproduktion. 
However, the income aggregates and indicators used are not indicators of farmersŐ total incomes or their disposable incomes, as they may have sources of income other than agricultural production.
Den landbrugsindkomst, der beregnes inden for rammerne af LR, kan derfor ikke tages som udtryk for landbrugernes eller landbrugshusholdningernes samlede indkomst. 
The agricultural incomes calculated in the context of the EAA must therefore, under no circumstances, be taken as the equivalent of the total earnings of the farmers or the farm households.
Det skal desuden tages i betragtning, at de indberettede tal er gennemsnitsvžrdier og ikke siger noget om indkomstforde-lingen. 
In addition, it should be borne in mind that the figures forwarded are average values, which give no indication of the distribution of incomes.
Hvis det ogs tages i betragtning, at den nžvner, der er anvendt ved beregningen af indikatorerne A og B (jf. figur 2), nemlig rsarbejdsenhed (1), ikke er helt den samme i alle medlemsstater, er det umuligt at sammenligne medlemsstaternes indkomster i absolutte vžrdier. 
If, in addition, one bears in mind that the denominator used to calculate indicators A and B (see Figure 2), i.e. the annual work unit (1), has not been completely standardised, it is impossible to compare incomes in absolute terms between the Member States.
Kun udviklingen i de enkelte medlemsstater kan sammenlignes. 
Only changes within each Member State can be compared.
Der kan derfor ikke drages nogen konklusioner vedrżrende indkomsternes absolutte vžrdi. 
No conclusions should thus be drawn concerning the absolute value of the incomes.
Det er grunden til, at Eurostat igennem flere r har undladt at drage sdanne konklusioner og kun sammenligner den konstaterede indkomstudvikling i de forskellige medlemsstater (2). 
For this reason Eurostat has refused for some years to draw such conclusions and has confined itself to a comparison of changes in incomes observed within the various Member States (2).
Indkomsten i sektoren landbrugshusholdninger (ISLH) 76. 
The Income of the Agricultural Households Sector (IAHS) 76.
Projektet vedrżrende indkomsten i sektoren landbrugshusholdninger blev udformet med henblik p at afhjžlpe manglen p oplysninger om landbrugsbefolkningens reelle levestandard. 
The income of the agricultural households sector project was designed to overcome an information deficit with regard to the real standard of living of the agricultural community.
Den disponible nettoindkomst, som beregnet i ISLH, har den fordel, at den ikke er baseret p landbrugsprodukter eller p bedriften, men p husholdningen. 
Net disposable income calculated using the IAHS offers the advantage that it is not based on agricultural products or the holding but on the household.
Den gżr det desuden muligt at tage forskellige andre indkomstkilder i betragtning Ń foruden kapitalafkast. 
In addition, it allows various other sources of income to be taken into consideration, in addition to income from capital.
I kraft af sin udformning er ISLH sledes langt bedre egnet til at mle levestandarden end INLB og LR. Dog m der (1) En rsarbejdsenhed svarer til det arbejde, der udfżres af en fuldtidsbeskžftiget person p landbrugsbedriften (Eurostat: Statistiques en bref, tema 5 Ń 2/2003, s. 
Overall, therefore, because of its structure, the IAHS appears greatly superior to the FADN and the EAA for the evalu-(1) An Annual Work Unit represents the labour provided by one person in full-time employment on an agricultural holding (Eurostat, Statistics in Focus, Theme 5-2/2003, p.
(2) Jf. den foregende stilling: Europa-Kommissionen: ČRevenu de lŐactivit agricoleÇ, 1998. Luxembourg, 1999, afsnit 6, s. 
(2) See previous situation: European Commission, Income from agricultural activity in 1998, Luxembourg, 1999, Chapter 6, p.
95 ff. tages forbehold, nr ISLH beregnes efter den makrożkonomiske metode, for i s fald gives der ingen oplysninger om indkomstfor-delingen. 
95 ff. ation of living standards. Where the IAHS is determined on the basis of the macroeconomic approach, reservations are called for since it says nothing about the distribution of incomes.
ISLH har imidlertid aldrig givet plidelige og sammenlignelige resultater, dels p grund af tekniske og finansielle problemer, dels fordi projektet ikke er en prioritet for Kommissionen og en ržkke medlemsstater. 
The IAHS has never achieved reliable and comparable results, however, because of technical and financial obstacles and because the Commission and a number of Member States do not give it high priority.
KONKLUSION 78. 
CONCLUSION 78.
De tre af Kommissionens redskaber, som Retten undersżgte Ń INLB, LR og ISLH Ń er alle beregnet til at mle landbrugsindkomsten. 
The three Commission instruments which were examined Ń the FADN, the EAA and the IAHS Ń are all intended to determine agricultural income.
Ved nžrmere eftersyn viser det sig imidlertid, at de tre instrumenter ikke er udformet med samme hensigt. 
When subjected to closer scrutiny, it is apparent that these three instruments have not been designed for the same purposes.
Landbrugsregnskaberne tjener til at beregne indtžgtsoverskuddet i forhold til omkostningerne for alle landbrugsprodukter. 
The EAA is used for calculating surplus income in relation to the costs of all agricultural products.
INLB tjener til at beregne indkomsten fra landbrugsbedrifter, der drives erhvervsmžssigt. 
The aim of the FADN is to calculate the income earned by agricultural holdings managed on a professional basis.
INLB og LR giver ingen direkte oplysninger om landbrugsbefolkningens levestandard (EF-traktatens artikel 33, stk. 1, litra b)). 
The FADN and the EAA do not provide any direct information on the standard of living of the agricultural community (Article 33(1)(b) of the EU Treaty).
ISLH blev udformet specifikt til dette forml. 
This is what the IAHS was designed to do.
Projektet har dog aldrig givet plidelige og sammenlignelige resultater. 
However, this project has never produced reliable and comparable results.
Retten konkluderer, at Fžllesskabets statistiske redskaber p nuvžrende tidspunkt ikke giver fuldstžndige oplysninger om landbrugshusholdningernes disponible indkomst, og at de ikke gżr det muligt at mle landbrugsbefolkningens levestandard. 
To conclude, at the present time the CommunityŐs statistical instruments do not provide sufficiently exhaustive information on the disposable incomes of agricultural households and do not allow an assessment of the living standard of the agricultural community to be made.
ANBEFALINGER 80. 
RECOMMENDATIONS 80.
Kommissionen bżr foretage en evaluering af de statistikker, som p nuvžrende tidspunkt foreligger om bedrifternes og landbrugshusholdningernes żkonomiske situation, og derefter nżjagtigt omdefinere den statistiske ramme, som den skal bruge for at kunne kontrollere gennemfżrelsen af mlene for den fžlles landbrugspolitik, navnlig mlene i EF-traktatens artikel 33. 
The Commission should evaluate the statistics available at present concerning the situation of holdings and agricultural households and then define precisely the statistical framework it requires to monitor achievement of the objectives of the CAP, in particular those set out in Article 33 of the EC Treaty.
For at kunne sammenligne de forskellige medlemsstaters resultater har Kommissionen fastlagt talrige regler for dataindhold, for kontrol af data og for beregning af indikatorer. 
For the results to allow comparison between the various Member States, the Commission has devised numerous rules governing the content of the data, the controls on them and the calculation of indicators.
Der er imidlertid s stort spillerum, at forskellene mellem medlemsstaterne kan indvirke p resultaternes sammenlignelighed. 
However, the room for manoeuvre is so large that the differences between the Member States may impair the comparability of the results.
Retten anbefaler, at der nedsžttes en tvžrfaglig gruppe, som skal opregne disse forskelle, vurdere dem og foresl de nżdvendige forbedringer. 
The Court recommends that a multi-disciplinary group should be set up to review these differences, evaluate them and propose the necessary improvements.
20.2.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 45/19 82. 
20.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/19 82.
Landbrugsregnskaberne er baseret p forskellige typer datakilder i de forskellige medlemsstater. 
The EEA are based on various types of sources depending on the Member States.
Eftersom kilderne og kvaliteten varierer fra den ene medlemsstat til den anden, anbefaler Retten at żge dataenes gennemsigtighed ved at udarbejde en data-oversigt og indfżre standardiserede kontroller. 
As the origin and quality vary from one Member State to the other, the Court recommends that the transparency of the data should be improved by drawing up an inventory and introducing standardised controls.
Det ville endvidere vžre meget nyttigt, hvis LR-brugerne kunne f et indtryk af dataenes kvalitet ved hjžlp af pržcise statistiske indikatorer. 
In addition, it would be very useful if the user of the EAA could form an opinion of the quality of the data with the help of precise statistical indicators.
For s vidt angr ISLH, bżr Kommissionen evaluere projektet og afgżre, under hvilke betingelser det skal viderefżres. 
With regard to the IAHS, the Commission should evaluate the project and decide under what conditions it can be pursued.
Retten anbefaler, at der vžlges en ensartet metode, enten makrożkonomisk eller mikrożkonomisk baseret p en forudgende definition af de statistiske oplysninger, som Kommissionen er absolut nżdt til at have for at kunne kontrollere, om mlet om en rimelig levestandard for landbrugsbefolkningen er opfyldt. 
The Court recommends that the Commission should opt for a uniform approach, either macroeconomic or microeco-nomic, on the basis of prior definition by the Commission of the statistical information which it absolutely must have if it is to monitor achievement of a fair standard of living for the agricultural community.
Vedtaget af Revisionsretten i Luxembourg p mżdet den 4. december 2003. 
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at the Court meeting of 4 December 2003.
C 45/20 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 20.2.2004 BILAG DE VŽSENTLIGSTE KONKLUSIONER I EKSPERTVURDERINGEN VEDRŻRENDE FORTOLKNINGEN AF EF-TRAKTATENS ARTIKEL 33 1. 
C 45/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 ANNEX MAIN CONCLUSIONS OF THE EXPERT APPRAISAL CONCERNING THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 33 OF THE EC TREATY 1.
For det fżrste er det nżdvendigt at sammenligne levestandarden med et givet niveau for at kunne tage stilling til, om standarden er rimelig (1). 
First of all, it appeared necessary to look at the question of the fairness of the standard of living in terms of a comparison with a given level (1).
Denne metode forudsžtter: a) en definition af sammenligningens genstand Ń levestandarden b) en afgržnsning af mlgruppen, hvis levestandard skal mles c) udpegelse af en referencegruppe, hvis levestandard skal vžre sammen-ligningsgrundlag, og d) fastlžggelse af en tžrskel, under hvilken levestandarden ikke lžngere kan betegnes som ČrimeligÇ. 
This approach presupposes that we: (a) define the subject of the comparison - the standard of living; (b) identify the target group; specify whose standard of living is to be measured; (c) identify a reference group whose standard of living will serve as a benchmark; (d) establish a threshold below which the standard of living can no longer be considered ÔfairŐ.
De betragtninger, der opsummeres i det fżlgende, er baseret p den offentliggjorte litteratur samt p den ekspertvurdering, der blev udfżrt for Retten. 
The considerations summarised below are based on published literature as well as the expert appraisal carried out for the Court.
Sammenligningens genstand: ČlevestandardenÇ 3. 
The subject of the comparison: Ôthe standard of livingŐ 3.
Levestandarden er et begreb for social velfžrd. 
ÔStandard of livingŐ is a concept of social well-being.
Livskvaliteten er afledt af forbruget, i dette tilfžlde det potentielle forbrug. 
The quality of life is derived from consumption, or in this case, from potential consumption.
Det potentielle forbrug beregnes som aggregatet af to stżrrelser, indkomst og formue. 
The latter comes from the aggregation of two variables Ń income and wealth.
Det potentielle forbrug sammenholdt med miljż og personlige faktorer ssom helbred giver den individuelle levestandard (jf. figuren herunder) (2). 
Potential consumption, associated with the environment and personal factors such as health, gives the individual standard of living (see Figure below) (2).
Figur Faktorer, der har indflydelse p levestandarden Kilde: Professor Stephan von Cramon, Institut for Landbrugsżkonomi, Gttingen Universitet. 
Figure Factors which affect the standard of living Source: Prof. Stephan von Cramon, Department of Agricultural Economics, Gttingen University.
(1) Professor Stephan von Cramon, Institut for Landbrugsżkonomi, Gttingen Universitet: Aspects of the CommissionŐs Management of the ČFair Standards of LivingÇ Treaty Objective, s. 
(1) Professor Stephan von Cramon, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Gttingen, Aspects of the CommissionŐs Management of the ÔFair Standards of LivingŐ Treaty Objective, p.
(2) Von Cramon, op. cit., s. 
(2) von Cramon, loc. cit. p.
6 ff. 
6 ff.
20.2.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 45/21 4. 
20.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/21 4.
Defineret p denne mde er det meget vanskeligt at mle levestandarden i praksis. 
Defined in this way, a personŐs Ôstandard of livingŐ is very difficult to measure in practice.
Derfor valgte Retten en metode, hvor kun den disponible indkomst mles (1). 
This is why the Court followed an approach involving the measurement of disposable income only (1).
Fordi begreberne levestandard og disponibel indkomst kun kan bruges om en fysisk person eller en gruppe af personer, kan bedriften ikke anvendes som referenceenhed ved sammenligningen. 
Given that Ôstandard of livingŐ and Ôdisposable incomeŐ can only concern natural persons or groups of persons, the holding cannot be used as a reference unit in the comparison.
I stedet er husstanden valgt som referenceenhed, fordi landbrugshusholdninger generelt lžgger indkomsterne sammen, og medlemmerne i husstanden i fžllesskab tržffer beslutninger om forbrug. 
The choice of the household as the unit is justified by the fact that, in agricultural households, incomes are generally pooled and that the members of the household take decisions on consumption together.
Referenceenheden ved sammenligninger bżr derfor vžre husstanden og ikke den enkelte landbruger (2). 
The reference unit for the comparison must therefore be the household and not the individual farmer (2).
Det sidste skridt i definitionen af mlgruppen bestr i at skelne landbrugshusholdninger fra andre husholdninger. 
The last stage in the definition of the target group consists in distinguishing agricultural households from non-agricultural households.
I henhold til de to kriterier, der oftest anvendes (indkomst og arbejdstid), er der tale om landbrugsvirksomhed, nr landbrug er den primžre indkomstkilde eller udgżr hovedaktiviteten. 
In accordance with the two criteria most often used for this purpose (income and working time), an occupation is held to be agricultural where agriculture constitutes the main source of income or the main activity.
Denne skelnen indebžrer, at en del af landbrugsbefolkningen udelukkes, for eksempel personer, der har landbrug som bibeskžf-tigelse, og ejere af jord, der er bortforpagtet og anvendes til landbrug (3). 
This distinction implies the exclusion of certain agricultural populations, such as persons who carry out a farming activity as a secondary occupation or the owners of land that is leased and used for farming (3).
Referencegruppen 7. 
The reference group 7.
Fžllesskabsinstitutionerne har ikke pržciseret, om sammenlig-ningskriteriet skal fastsžttes p regionalt, nationalt eller europžisk plan, og om sammenligningen skal foretages inden for landbrugssektoren eller mellem denne sektor og andre sociale grupper (4). 
The Community institutions have not specified whether the criterion for comparison should be set at the regional, national or European level or whether comparisons must be made within4the agricultural sector or between this sector and other social groups ( ).
Allerede p Stresa-konferencen i 1958 erklžrede landbrugsministrene imidlertid, at de frem for alt var bekymrede over de forholdsvis ugunstige indkomstforhold i landbruget (5), men de angav ikke, hvilke erhvervsgrupper der skulle anvendes som reference. 
However, as early as the 1958 Stresa Conference, the Agriculture Ministers made it clear that they were concerned, above all, by the relatively less favourable situation of farm incomes (5), but did not specify which occupational groups should be used as a benchmark.
Da flertallet af landbrugere arbejder p eget initiativ og for egen risiko, er det logisk at sammenligne dem med andre selvstžndige (6). 
Since the majority of farmers work on their own initiative and at their own risk, it is logical to compare them with other entrepreneurs (6).
Definition af begrebet ČrimeligÇ 8. 
The definition of ÔfairnessŐ 8.
En landbrugers indkomst, som befinder sig under en vis tžrskel, kan betegnes som ikke-rimelig(7). 
Any farmerŐs income that is below a certain threshold may be considered ÔunfairŐ (7).
I stedet ses der p indkomstfordelingen (8). 
It refers to the distribution or allocation of incomes (8).
Ligesom i forbindelse med fattigdomsgržnsen er det imidlertid vanskeligt at sžtte en gržnse for, hvornr levestandarden ikke lžngere kan betegnes som rimelig (9). 
Like the so-called Ôpoverty lineŐ, it is difficult to establish a limit below which the standard of living can no longer be considered to be fair (9).
De Europžiske Fžllesskaber har endnu ikke lżst dette problem. 
The European Communities have not, to date, solved this problem.
(1) Disponibel indkomst: Samlede indtžgter Ń obligatoriske udgifter (f.eks. skatter og sociale bidrag). 
(1) Disposable income: Total income-compulsory expenditure (e.g. taxes and social security contributions).
(3) Von Cramon, op. cit., s. 
(3) von Cramon, loc. cit. p.
(4) Von Cramon, op. cit., s. 
(4) von Cramon, loc. cit. p.
(5) EŻF-medlemsstaternes landbrugskonference fra 3. til 11 juli 1959, citeret efter: Gottsmann: Der Gemeinsame Agrarmarkt, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Loseblattsammlung, 1.8.1998, I A 1, s. 
(5) Agriculture conference of the Member States of the European Economic Community from 3 to 11 July 1959, quoted from; Gottsmann, Der Gemeinsame Agrarmarkt, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft Baden-Baden, Loseblattsammlung, 1.8.1998, I A 1, p.
2 f. 
2 f.
(6) Von Cramon, op. cit., s. 
(6) von Cramon, loc. cit. p.
(7) Samme fremgangsmde fżlges normalt, nr begrebet fattigdom skal defineres (jf. eksempelvis von Cramon, op. cit., s. 
(7) The same procedure is generally followed for the definition of the concept of poverty (see, for example, von Cramon, op. cit., p.
1 og 38). 
1 and p. 38).
(8) Von Cramon, op. cit., s. 
(8) von Cramon, loc. cit. p.
1 og 14. 
1 and p. 14.
(9) Von Cramon, op. cit., s. 
(9) von Cramon, loc. cit. p.
C 45/22 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 20.2.2004 KOMMISSIONENS SVAR II. a) b) RESUM Kvalitetsforbedringen og isžr de af INLB afledte statistiske datas sammenlignelighed er et af de stżrste problemer for de tjenestegrene, der udarbejder disse statistikker, og Kommissionen, INLB-komiten og medlemsstaterne har til stadighed opmžrksomheden rettet derp. 
C 45/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES II. (a) (b) SUMMARY Improving the quality and especially the comparability of the statistical data from the FADN is a major concern of the departments responsible for these statistics and has been the subject of constant attention on the part of the Commission, the FADN Committee and the Member States.
Medlemsstaterne har indfżrt en grundlžggende strategi med det forml at forbedre kvaliteten og harmonisere INLB-resultaterne. 
The latter have introduced a basic methodology designed to improve quality and harmonise the results from the FADN.
Landbrugs-sektorens regionale forskelligartethed Ń bde sociożkonomisk og strukturelt Ń har fżrt til, at visse medlemsstater har vedtaget specifikke regler. 
It is true that the regional diversity of agriculture Ń in both socioeconomic and structural terms Ń has meant the adoption of rules specific to some Member States.
Men virkningen af de forskellige metoder, som Revisionsretten nžvner, er minimal, fordi prżveudtagningen og vžgtningen er blevet foretaget med stor omhu. 
However, the impact of the methodological differences referred to by the Court is reduced as much as possible by the efforts made regarding sampling and weighting.
Arbejdsgruppen vedrżrende landbrugsregnskaber og -priser kontrollerer til stadighed grundigt nżjagtigheden og sammenligneligheden af landbrugets żkonomiske regnskaber, og den foretager ligeledes mere specifikke kontroller, f.eks. udarbejder den oversigter. 
The economic accounts for agriculture are continuously and closely monitored for accuracy and comparability by the Working Party ÔAgricultural accounts and pricesŐ and more specific controls such as the inventories.
Derfor har kvaliteten af de indkomststatistikker, der udarbejdes som led i de żkonomiske regnskaber for landbruget, altid vžret betragtet som tilfredsstillende. 
This is why the quality of the income statistics produced under the EAA has always been considered satisfactory.
Hvis i żvrigt medlemsstaterne selv kunne vžlge kilder for dataene efter deres landbrugssektors og statistiske systems specifikke struktur, ville det have en meget beskeden virkning p datakvaliteten i disse regnskaber. 
In addition, although the choice of sources of data is left to the Member States depending on the specific structure of their agricultural sector and their statistical system, this has little impact on the quality of the EAA data.
Det er sledes ikke en harmonisering af datakilderne, men snarere en harmonisering af begreberne og principperne for udarbejdelsen, der sikrer harmoniseringen af dataene i de żkonomiske regnskaber for landbruget mellem medlemsstaterne og derved forbedrer kvaliteten deraf. 
It is in fact not the harmonisation of data sources but the harmonisation of definitions and principles of data extraction which guarantees the harmonisation of the EAA data among Member States and contributes to their quality.
Endelig har undersżgelser vist, at jo flere datakilder der er, jo vanskeligere og mere komplekst bliver det at fastlžgge og fortolke indikatorerne for nżjagtigheden med henblik p udarbejdelsen af statistikker, som f.eks. nationalregnskabet og landbrugsregnskaberne. 
Finally, studies have shown that the multiplicity of data sources makes accuracy indicators very difficult to establish and complex to interpret for such statistics as national accounts and accounts for agriculture.
Statistikken over landbrugshusholdningernes indtžgter er ikke af samme kvalitet og ensartethed og er ikke lige s ajourfżrt som INLB og landbrugets żkonomiske regnskaber. 
The statistics on incomes of agricultural households do not benefit from the same degree of quality, homogeneity and updating as the FADN and the EAA.