natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen bżr regelmžssigt ajourfżre denne liste med henblik p at maksimere synergier, isžr nr forskellige fonde og vžrktżjer krydser hinanden. 
The Commission should regularly update this list with a 30 Recommendation 1 - Improve the framework for overall coordination of actions addressing radicalisation
Listen bżr vžre tilgžngelig for projektansżgere b) udnytte de potentielle synergier mellem Kommissionens aktioner optimalt ved at formalisere kravet om at anvende RAN til at formidle resultaterne af vellykkede EU-finansierede projekter. 
The list should be available to project applicants; make the most of potential synergies between Commission actions by formalising the requirement to use the RAN to disseminate the results of successful EU-funded projects.
Tidsfrist: juni 2019. 
Timeframe: June 2019.
F.eks. har den ikke opdelt de overordnede politikml i mere specifikke og mlbare ml, og de midler, den har anvendt til at bekžmpe radikalisering, er ikke ledsaget af indikatorer og mlsžtninger, der kan bruges til at mle fremskridtene med hensyn til at opfylde dette ml (jf. punkt 29-31). 
For example, it has not broken down the overall policy objectives into more specific and measurable objectives, and the funds that the Commission has used to address radicalisation are not accompanied by indicators and targets designed to measure success in pursuit of this goal (see paragraphs 29 to 31).
Der er derfor en risiko for, at nyttige erfaringer ikke bliver formidlet eller taget i betragtning, nr Kommissionen udformer andre aktioner eller videreudvikler sin politik (jf. punkt 32-36). 
As a result, there is a risk that useful lessons might not be disseminated or taken into account when the Commission designs actions or develops its policy further (see paragraphs 32 to 36).
35 Anbefaling 3 - Forbedring af rammen for resultatvurdering Kommissionen bżr evaluere opfyldelsen af sine politikml og sikre, at det kan dokumenteres, hvor effektive de EU-finansierede aktioner faktisk er. 
32 Recommendation 3 Đ Improve the framework for assessing results The Commission should evaluate its success in achieving its policy goals and ensure that EU-funded actions can provide evidence of how effective they actually are.
Kommissionen bżr navnlig: a) gennemfżre den nżdvendige hżring og forskning for at identificere ml og indikatorer, som den kan bruge til at evaluere sine resultater med hensyn til at opfylde politikmlene og sikre valuta for pengene i forbindelse med sin stżtte til medlemsstaternes bekžmpelse af radikalisering. 
In particular the Commission should: carry out the necessary consultation and research in order to identify objectives and indicators for evaluating its success and value for money in achieving its policy goals in helping Member States to address radicalisation.
Den bżr derefter regelmžssigt rapportere om de samlede fremskridt med hensyn til at opfylde mlene for dens politik for bekžmpelse af radikalisering, herunder om, hvor mange EU-midler der er involveret b) anmode RAN-ekspertisecentret om at udarbejde mere detaljerede rapporter om sin effektivitet, f.eks. i form af deltagernes tilfredshed, opnede viden og kontakter, deres anvendelse heraf og effekten af dette p deres job eller p organisationens resultater c) gennem EU's internetforum fżre tilsyn med: Ľ hvordan EU IRU og de nationale IRU'er samarbejder om at sikre komplementaritet og undg unżdvendig duplikering i indberetningen af terrorrelateret indhold til IT-virksomheder Ľ i hvilken udstržkning fjernelse af terrorpropaganda har en effekt p forekomsten heraf p internettet Ľ hvor hurtigt det indhold, som EU IRU indberetter, bliver fjernet d) sikre, at projektansżgere dokumenterer, hvordan de vil mle effektiviteten af deres projekter. 
It should then report regularly on the overall progress made towards achieving the objectives of its counter-radicalisation policy, including the EU funds involved; request the RAN Centre of Excellence to provide more detailed reports on its effectiveness, e.g. participant satisfaction, the knowledge and contacts acquired, how these were used, and their impact on the job or on the organisationŐs results; oversee through the EU Internet Forum: Ľ cooperation between the EU IRU and national IRUs in ensuring complementarity and avoiding unnecessary duplication in referring terrorist content to IT companies; Ľ the extent to which removing terrorist propaganda has an impact on its prevalence on the internet;
P Revisionsrettens vegne Klaus-Heiner Lehne Formand 36 
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President
Eksempler p EU-finansierede aktioner til bekžmpelse af radikalisering Bekžmpelse af terrorpropaganda Fremme af inklusive og robuste samfund BILAG 1 Aktion Ml med hensyn til bekžmpelse af radikalisering Finansiering Forvaltning Netvžrk til bevidstgżrelse omkring radikalisering (RAN) Yde stżtte til medlemsstaterne i forbindelse med udarbejdelsen af omfattende forebyggelsesarbejde, udarbejdelsen af retningslinjer og hndbżger med henblik p oprettelse af strukturer for flere forskellige instanser, oprettelsen af en platform til udveksling af erfaringer og praksis og den yderligere kortlžgning af forskningen i radikalisering. 
Examples of EU-funded actions addressing radicalisation Countering terrorist propaganda Promoting inclusive and resilient societies ANNEX 1 Action Objective in addressing radicalisation Funding Management Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) Provide support for Member States in designing and implementing effective prevention work, providing guidelines and handbooks for establishing multi-agency structures, creating a platform for exchanging experiences and practices, and through further mapping of research on radicalisation Internal Security Fund-Police DG HOME Research grants Bridge the gap between academia and security practitioners in the field of radicalisation to strengthen the capacity of Member States to fine-tune existing policy approaches and develop new policies and practices (Research topics: develop a comprehensive approach to violent radicalisation and contemporary radicalisation trends) Horizon 2020 programme DG HOME DG RTD Security projects under direct and shared management Develop tools of outreach, engagement and assistance to local actors and families to prevent radicalisation Internal Security Fund-Police DG HOME Action Objective in addressing radicalisation Funding Management EU Internet Referral Unit (EUIRU) Countering online terrorist propaganda Europol Europol EU Internet Forum Commission initiative to involve internet companies in countering terrorist propaganda Internal Security Fund DG HOME European Strategic Communications Network Provide Member States, civil society and EU institutions with expertise in developing policy frameworks, communication campaigns or individual initiatives.
Erasmus+ GD EAC KOMMISSIONENS SVAR P DEN EUROPŽISKE REVISIONSRETS SŽRBERETNING "BEKŽMPELSE AF RADIKALISERING, DER FŻRER TIL TERRORISME: KOMMISSIONEN ADRESSEREDE MEDLEMSSTATERNES BEHOV, MEN DER VAR MANGLER I KOORDINERINGEN OG EVALUERINGEN" RESUM V. Siden 2017 har Kommissionen forbedret sin oversigt over EU-finansierede foranstaltninger og er i stand til at identificere synergier mellem forskellige fonde og aktioner, navnlig inden for rammerne af taskforcen vedrżrende sikkerhedsunionen og dens sžrlige undergruppe om radikalisering. 
REPLIES OF THE COMMISSION TO THE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS "TACKLING RADICALISATION THAT LEADS TO TERRORISM: THE COMMISSION ADDRESSED THE NEEDS OF MEMBER STATES, BUT WITH SOME SHORTFALLS IN COORDINATION AND EVALUATION" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V. Since 2017, the Commission has improved its overview of EU funded actions and is able to identify synergies between different funds and actions in particular within the framework of the Security Union Task Force and its dedicated subgroup on radicalisation.
Mlene for Kommissionens politik til forebyggelse og bekžmpelse af radikalisering er fastlagt i de relevante politikdokumenter. 
The objectives of the Commission's policy on preventing and countering radicalisation are set out in the relevant policy documents.
Disse er nżdvendigvis af mere generel karakter, mens de mere konkrete ml er fastlagt under de relevante initiativer. 
These are necessarily of a more general nature with more concrete objectives being set out under the relevant initiatives.
Kommissionen understreger, at individuelle projekter og initiativer evalueres, og deres resultater registreres. 
The Commission underlines that individual projects and initiatives are evaluated and their achievements are recorded.
Dette indgr i den generelle evaluering af fonde og programmer. 
This feeds into the general evaluation of funds and programmes.
Kommissionen anerkender dog, at de mere langsigtede virkninger af disse foranstaltninger ikke mles systematisk. 
However, the Commission recognises that the longer term impact of these actions is not measured in a systematic way.
Udviklingen af viden om radikalisering finder ikke kun sted gennem projekter, der finansieres under Horisont 2020, men ogs gennem andre EU-fonde, navnlig Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed Đ Politi, herunder netvžrket til bevidstgżrelse omkring radikalisering (RAN), der ogs har til opgave at udveksle og indfżre god praksis. 
The development of knowledge on radicalisation is not only done through projects funded under Horizon 2020, but also done through other EU funds and in particular the Internal Security Fund Police (ISF-P) including the Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) which is also tasked to share and establish good practices.
Projekter, der finansieres under Den Europžiske Socialfond, har bl.a. til forml at styrke robustheden mere generelt, men kan ogs specifikt imżdeg radikalisering (f.eks. BAANA-projektet). 
Projects funded under the European Social Fund aim inter alia to strengthen resilience more broadly but can also specifically address radicalisation (e.g. the project BAANA).
Exitstrategier i bredere forstand samt rehabiliterings-og afradikaliseringsprojekter finansieres ikke kun under programmet for retlige anliggender, men kan ogs finansieres af Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed Đ Politi, sdan som det for żjeblikket er tilfžldet med den generelle forslagsindkaldelse vedrżrende afradikalisering, der blev ivžrksat i november 2017. 
Exit strategies in the broader sense as well as rehabilitation and de-radicalisation projects are not only funded under the Justice programme but can be also funded by ISF-P as it is currently the case with the general call on radicalisation launched in November 2017.
BEMŽRKNINGER Tekstboks 5 Selv om Kommissionen faktisk tilpasser sin politiske reaktion til et trusselsbillede i konstant udvikling, forfżlger Kommissionens arbejde inden for forebyggelse af radikalisering bde langsigtede og kortsigtede ml. 
OBSERVATIONS Box 5 While the Commission indeed adapts its policy response to an evolving threat picture, the Commission's work in the area of prevention of radicalisation is following long term as well as short term objectives.
P denne mde adresserer mange af arbejdsstrżmmene alle former for radikalisering. 
In this sense, many of the work streams address all forms of radicalisation.
19. a) Emnet medier og kommunikation er blevet adresseret p forskellige mder: Det blev medtaget i Kommissionens meddelelse fra 2005 (kapitel 2.1 om radio-og tv). Dette emne (herunder navnlig problemet med polarisering) blev ogs drżftet inden for rammerne af RAN samt ESCN (det europžiske strategiske kommunikationsnetvžrk), og Kommissionen prioriterede dette emne i den seneste indkaldelse af forslag i 2017 (ISF-2017-AG-RAD). 
19. (a) The topic of media and communication has been addressed in different ways: it was included in the 2005 Commission Communication (chapter 2.1 Broadcast Media); this topic (including in particular the issue of polarisation) was also discussed in the framework of the RAN as well as ESCN (European Strategic Communications Network), and the Commission has given priority to this topic in the recent 2017 call for proposals (ISF-2017-AG-RAD).
Desuden blev spżrgsmlet taget op i Kommissionens ekspertgruppe p hżjt plan om radikalisering (HLCEG-R), der i sin forelżbige rapport fra december 2017 opfordrer medlemsstaterne til (med stżtte fra Kommissionen) at undersżge, om de eksisterende instrumenter er tilstržkkelige til effektivt at forhindre spredning af voldelig ekstremistisk propaganda via traditionelle medier. 1 
Furthermore, the matter was raised in the High Level Commission Expert Group on Radicalisation (HLCEG-R) recommending in its December 2017 interim report for Member States (with the support of the Commission) to examine whether existing tools are sufficient to effectively prevent the spread of violent extremist propaganda via traditional media. (b) The Commission has put in place the necessary measures to address the needs to develop exit strategies.
Kommissionen har allerede tidligere finansieret store exitprogrammer inden for rammerne af ISEC (programmet for forebyggelse og bekžmpelse af kriminalitet), som finansieringen af det europžiske netvžrk for afradikalisering (ENoD) i 2012-2013 er det vigtigste eksempel p. 
Already in the past, the Commission has funded major exit programs under ISEC (Programme Prevention and Fight against Crime), the funding of the European Network of De-radicalisation (ENoD) in 2012-2013 being the most important example.
Efter vedtagelsen af meddelelsen om radikalisering fra 2014 opfordrede Kommissionen desuden medlemsstaterne til at medtage udviklingen af exitstrategierne som finansieringsprioritet i deres nationale programmer. 
adoption of the 2014 Communication on Radicalisation, the Commission invited Member States to include the development of exit strategies as funding priority under their National Programmes.
Exitprogrammer er fortsat en prioritet og blev medtaget i en indkaldelse af forslag, der blev ivžrksat i november 20171. 
Exit programmes remain a priority and have been included in a call for proposals opened in November 20171.
Tekstboks 6 Ud over de procedurer og mekanismer til fremme af koordineringen mellem forskellige fonde og initiativer, som Revisionsretten nžvner, har der navnlig siden 2017 ogs fundet koordinering sted p det mere overordnede politiske plan gennem taskforcen vedrżrende sikkerhedsunionen og mere specifikt undergruppen om radikalisering. 
Box 6 In addition to the procedures and mechanisms to facilitate coordination between different funds and initiatives mentioned by the Court of Auditors, coordination also takes place at the broader policy level in particular since 2017 through the Security Union Task Force as well as more specifically the subgroup on radicalisation.
Kommissionen mener, at selv om t dokument żger gennemsigtigheden, koordinerede Kommissionens relevante tjenestegrene foranstaltninger gennem eksisterende procedurer selv uden en konsolideret liste over EU-finansierede aktioner til bekžmpelse af radikalisering. 
The Commission considers that, while a single document increases transparency, even without a consolidated list of EU funded counter radicalisation actions the relevant Commission's services coordinated actions through existing procedures.
I 2017 oprettede Kommissionen taskforcen vedrżrende sikkerhedsunionen og dens undergruppe om radikalisering med henblik p at forbedre koordineringen af EU-foranstaltninger til bekžmpelse af radikalisering og identificere synergier mellem forskellige fonde og aktioner. 
In 2017 the Commission set up the Security Union Task Force and its subgroup on radicalisation in order to improve coordination of EU actions addressing radicalisation and to identify synergies between different funds and actions.
Den anbefalede mulighed for stżrre synergi mellem fjernelse af indhold og modfortžllingskampagner er aldrig blevet forelagt for Kommissionen eller EU's internetforum, der forfżlger begge ml og derfor ville have vžret det relevante forum. 
The suggested opportunity for greater synergy between removal of content and counter narrative campaigns has never been submitted to the Commission or the EU Internet Forum, which pursues both objectives and would therefore have been the appropriate forum.
Derfor mener Kommissionen ikke, at der har vžret manglende koordinering fra Kommissionens side. 
Therefore the Commission does not consider that there has been a lack of coordination on the part of the Commission.
Navnlig gennem mżder inden for rammerne af EU's internetforum eller Europols rdgivende gruppe om ECTC (Det Europžiske Center for Terrorbekžmpelse), der blev oprettet i oktober 2016, og som VoxPol og ESCN deltager i, har henholdsvis Kommissionen og Europol fremmet tžttere samarbejde og koordinering mellem EU-finansierede foranstaltninger. 
In particular through the encounters under the EU Internet Forum or in the context of the ECTC (European Counter Terrorism Centre) Advisory Group of Europol established in October 2016 and in which VoxPol and ESCN participate, the Commission and Europol, respectively have facilitated closer engagement and coordination between EU funded actions.
28. a) RAN har allerede givet en lang ržkke praktiske resultater bl.a. i form af hndbżger og kurser (f.eks. uddannelsesprogrammer for europžiske politifolk, manifestet for uddannelse, hndbogen om hjemvendte udenlandske terrorkrigere for blot at nžvne nogle f). 
28. (a) RAN has already produced a large number of practical outputs in the form of inter alia handbooks and trainings (e.g. training programmes for Europe's police officers, Manifesto for education, Manual on Foreign Terrorist Fighters returnees to name but a few).
RAN-samlingens primžre forml er at inspirere andre fagfolk, og RAN-samlingen synes ikke at vžre det sted, hvor fagfolk ville sżge efter finansieringsmuligheder. 
The RAN Collection's primary purpose is to inspire other practitioners and the RAN Collection would not seem to be the place where practitioners would search for funding opportunities.
Oplysningerne om projektets finansiering er tilgžngelige i andre sammenhžnge. b) Kommissionen er klar over rsagerne til forskellen i deltagelse af interessenter fra de enkelte medlemsstater. 
The information about project funding is available in other contexts. (b) The Commission is aware of the reasons that explain the difference in participation of stakeholders from individual Member States.
Ud over de rsager, som Revisionsretten nžvner, bżr man holde sig for żje, at det er naturligt, at fagfolk fra lande, der har stet over for stżrre terrortrusler, eller som rder over mere avancerede forebyggelsestiltag og en mere avanceret forebyggelsespraksis samt ekspertise, er bedre repržsenteret end andre. 
In addition to the reasons mentioned by the ECA, it should be kept in mind that it is normal that practitioners from countries that faced higher terrorist threats or with more advanced prevent approaches and practices as well as expertise in place are more represented than others.
Kommissionen finder det fortsat vigtigt at drżfte med medlemsstaterne, hvilke prioriteter, behov og udfordringer de har. 
The Commission continues to consider important to discuss with Member States their priorities, needs and challenges.
Siden 2017 er det isžr sket gennem HLCEG-R. 
Since 2017 this is done in particular through the HLCEG-R.
Den forelżbige rapport, der blev offentliggjort i november 2017, indeholdt allerede nyttige retningslinjer for de aktiviteter, der skulle tilrettelžgges af RAN og ESCN i lżbet af 2018. 
Its interim report issued in November 2017 already provided useful steer for activities to be organised by the RAN and ESCN in the course of 2018.
RAN fżrer, overvger og ajourfżrer deltagerlisten, der giver et overblik over de enkelte medlemsstaters fagfolk. 
The RAN keeps, monitors and updates the list of participants which provides an overview of practitioners per Member State.
P grundlag af listen kan RAN og Kommissionen se, hvordan deltagelsen af fagfolk fra en bestemt medlemsstat udvikler sig. 
Based on the list the RAN and the Commission can see how the participation by practitioners from a particular Member States evolves. (d) The RAN includes already a large number of organisations on the ground with no links to governments in addition to a large number of other relevant first line practitioners.
1 Indkaldelse 2017-ISFP-AG-RAD. 2 
1 Call 2017-ISFP-AG-RAD 2
Kommissionen er af den opfattelse, at disse fagfolks viden og erfaring bidrager til den politiske debat, hvilket sikrer en bottom-up-tilgang. e) Udvekslinger mellem fagfolk og politiske beslutningstagere finder sted p forskellige mder: Der var en ržkke arrangementer, hvor resultater og anbefalinger fra fagfolk blev delt med politiske beslutningstagere (f.eks. RAN-konferencen p hżjt plan i november 2016 eller RAN-konferencen om hjemvendte udenlandske krigere i juni 2017). 
(e) Exchanges between practitioners and policy makers take place in different ways: There were a number of events where findings and recommendations from practitioners were shared with policy makers (e.g. the RAN High Level Conference in November 2016 or the RAN Conference on returnees in June 2017).
Kommissionen mener, at RAN-konferencen om hjemvendte udenlandske krigere samt hndbogen og de opfżlgende workshopper om samme emne med repržsentanter fra medlemsstaterne har betydelig indvirkning p udviklingen af politikkerne p dette omrde p EU-plan og, hvad der er nok s vigtigt, p medlemsstatsplan. 
The Commission considers that the RAN Conference on returnees, together with the handbook and the follow up workshops on the same matter with Member States representatives are having a significant impact on the development of policies in this area at EU but more importantly at the level of Member States.
Kommissionen samarbejder ogs med medlemsstaterne for at fastsl, hvor der efter medlemsstaternes opfattelse er mulighed for yderligere stżtte gennem RAN eller p anden vis. 
The Commission is also engaged with Member States to determine where Member States see scope for further support through the RAN or otherwise.
HLCEG-R, der blev oprettet i juli 2017, er en rdgivende gruppe, som hjžlper Kommissionen med at identificere sdanne behov og finde passende lżsninger. 
The HLCEG-R set up in July 2017 is an advisory group which helps the Commission identify such needs and formulate appropriate responses.
Anbefalingerne i den forelżbige rapport fra HLCEG-R fra november 2017 er afspejlet i dens rlige aktivitetsplan for 2018, i det omfang de er relevante for RAN. 
The recommendations of the interim report of the HLCEG-R of November 2017, when relevant to RAN, are reflected in its Annual Activity Plan for 2018.
P denne mde sikrer Kommissionen, at RAN's mervžrdi maksimeres i praksis ved at tilbyde tjenester, der adresserer de prioriteter og udfordringer, som medlemsstaterne har identificeret. 
In this way the Commission ensures that the RAN's added value is maximised in practice offering services that address priorities and challenges identified by Member States.
Problemet med radikalisering i fžngsler er blevet en politisk prioritet i trd med den żgede bevidsthed blandt de relevante interessenter inden for fžngsler og prżvetid under tilsyn. 
The issue of radicalisation in prisons became a political priority in line with increased awareness among the relevant stakeholders in the prison and probation field.
Organisationer ssom Europardet, EuroPris og CEP (Confederation of European Probation) begyndte fżrst at blive aktivt involveret i dette spżrgsml i lżbet af 2015, hvor Kommissionen identificerede foranstaltninger, der skulle finansieres gennem programmet for retlige anliggender. 
Organisations such as the Council of Europe, EuroPris and CEP (Confederation of European Probation) started becoming actively involved with this issue only in the course of 2015 when the Commission identified actions to be financed by the Justice Programme.
Kommissionen finder sledes, at det er vigtigt at rde over tilstržkkelige oplysninger om fremskridtene med og effektiviteten af den samlede stżtte, den yder gennem sine foranstaltninger. 
The Commission considers that it is indeed important to possess sufficient information about progress and effectiveness of its actions overall support.