natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Et nyt system skulle være fuldt ud implementeret inden udgangen af 2016. 
A new system should be fully implemented by the end of 2016.
Anbefaling 6 — Styrk ekspertisen inden for fast ejendom EU-Udenrigstjenesten accepterer anbefalingen. 
Recommendation 6 — Reinforce real-estate management expertise The EEAS accepts the recommendation.
EU-Udenrigstjenestens personalepolitik fremmer personalets mobilitet undtagen for stillinger, der kræver særlige ekspertise. 
The Human Resources policy of the EEAS promotes the mobility of staff except for positions requiring specific expertise.
Der vil blive fokuseret på udarbejdelsen af mere fleksible kriterier for visse ekspertstillinger. 
Consideration will be given to establishing more flexible mobility criteria for some expert posts.
Regionaliseringen af delegationens forvaltning vil også gøre det muligt at opbygge og vedligeholde ekspertise. 
The regionalisation of delegation management will also enable expertise to be built and maintained.
EU-Udenrigstjenestens svar 66 Anbefaling 7 — Udarbejd mellemfristede planer EU-Udenrigstjenesten accepterer delvist anbefalingen. 
Reply of the EEAS 66 Recommendation 7 — Establish medium-term plans The EEAS partially accepts the recommendation.
EU-Udenrigstjenesten mener, at en planlægningshorisont på mere en 2-3 år kun kan være vejledende, da de oplysninger, der er nødvendige for udarbejdelsen af sådanne planer, er underlagt politiske og praktiske usikkerhedsmomenter (f.eks. udvikling i personalet, sikkerhedssituationen, medlemsstaternes planer), som er vanskelige at forudsige med en længere tidshorisont. 
The EEAS considers that a planning horizon of more than 2-3 years can only be indicative, as the information required for the development of such plans is subject to political and practical uncertainties (e.g. evolution of staff, security context, Member States’ plans) which are difficult to predict beyond such a time frame.
Navnlig med hensyn til ændringer og vedligeholdelse kan en sådan fremadrettet planlægning endvidere kun være relevant for større projekter. 
Moreover, regarding modifications and maintenance in particular, such forward-looking planning can only be relevant for major projects.
Anbefaling 8 — Find frem til, i hvilke tilfælde det bedre kan betale sig at købe, og forvalt ejede bygninger effektivt EU-Udenrigstjenesten accepterer anbefalingen med forbehold af disponible ressourcer. 
Recommendation 8 — Identify where purchasing offers better value for money and manage owned buildings effectively The EEAS accepts the recommendation subject to the availability of resources.
Det nye IT-værktøj for forvaltning af fast ejendom, der er under udvikling, vil også understøtte rapportering, analyse, budgetlægning og projektplanlægning i bred forstand. 
The new IT tool for real-estate inventory management under development will also support analysis, budgeting and, in a wider sense, project planning.
Med et hold på kun 13 medarbejdere er EU-Udenrigstjenestens muligheder for effektivt at forvalte en så stor portefølje imidlertid begrænsede. 
However, with a team of only 13 staff, there are limitations as to the possibilities for the EEAS to manage effectively such a huge portfolio.
Tjenesten for EU’s Optræden Udadtil (EU-Udenrigstjenesten) stiller kontorbygninger til rådighed for medarbejderne i de ca. 140 EU-delegationer verden over og stiller boliger til rådighed for delegationscheferne. 
The European External Action Service (EEAS) provides office buildings for EU staff and residences for heads of delegation in around 140 EU delegations around the world.
I denne beretning undersøger Den Europæiske Revisionsret, om bygningerne opfylder EU-Udenrigstjenestens behov og giver valuta for pengene. 
In this report the Court of Auditors examines whether buildings meet the needs of the EEAS and provide value for money.
Den konkluderer, at bygningerne generelt opfylder delegationernes behov, men i nogle tilfælde ikke giver mest mulig valuta for pengene: De fleste kontorbygninger er for store, EU-Udenrigstjenesten ejer bygninger, som den ikke længere bruger, og de beløb, der afkræves nogle af de organisationer, som lejer kontorlokaler i delegationerne, sikrer ikke fuld omkostningsdækning. 
It concludes that buildings generally meet the needs of the EEAS but in some cases do not provide best value for money: most offices have too much space, the EEAS owns buildings which it no longer uses and the charges to some organisations renting space in delegations do not recover full costs.
Revisionsretten undersøger årsagerne til disse mangler og fremsætter anbefalinger om at styrke systemerne, navnlig i lyset af EU-Udenrigstjenestens planer om at investere i køb af bygninger frem for at leje. 
The audit examines the reasons for these shortfalls and makes recommendations to strengthen systems, particularly in view of EEAS plans to invest in purchasing, rather than renting, buildings.
13 Sžrberetning EUŐs bistand til styrkelse af den offentlige administration i Moldova DEN EUROPŽISKE REVISIONSRET 
EN 2016 Special Report NO 13 EU assistance for strengthening the public administration in Moldova EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS
DEN EUROPŽISKE REVISIONSRET 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tlf. +352 4398-1 Kontakt: eca.europa.eu/da/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Websted: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA Yderligere oplysninger om EU fs p internet via Europaserveren (http://europa.eu) Luxembourg: Den Europžiske Unions Publikationskontor, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-4945-6 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-4973-9 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-4962-3 Š Den Europžiske Union, 2016 Eftertryk tilladt med kildeangivelse ISSN 1831-0796 ISSN 1977-5636 ISSN 1977-5636 doi:10.2865/888419 doi:10.2865/554261 doi:10.2865/44387 QJ-AB-16-013-DA-C QJ-AB-16-013-DA-N QJ-AB-16-013-DA-E DA 2016 nr. 
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Enquiries: eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Website: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-4946-3 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-4963-0 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-4954-8 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/0308 doi:10.2865/801339 doi:10.2865/44777 QJ-AB-16-013-EN-C QJ-AB-16-013-EN-N QJ-AB-16-013-EN-E © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
13 Sžrberetning EUŐs bistand til styrkelse af den offentlige administration i Moldova (artikel 287, stk. 4, andet afsnit, TEUF) 
EN 2016 Special Report NO 13 EU assistance for strengthening the public administration in Moldova (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU)
Med henblik p at opn maksimal effekt udvžlger og udformer Revisionsretten sine revisionsopgaver under hensyntagen til de risici, der knytter sig til resultatopnelse eller regeloverholdelse, de pgžldende indtžgters eller udgifters omfang, den fremtidige udvikling samt den politiske og offentlige interesse. 
The ECA selects and designs these audit tasks to be of maximum impact by considering the risks to performance or compliance, the level of income or spending involved, forthcoming developments and political and public interest.
Revisionsarbejdet blev ledet af Hans Gustaf Wessberg, medlem af Revisionsretten, med stżtte fra kabinetschef Peter Eklund; attach Emmanuel-Douglas Hellinakis, ledende administrator Sabine Hiernaux-Fritsch, opgaveansvarlig Laura Gores samt revisorerne Erika Soveges og Alexandre Tan. 
The audit was led by ECA Member Hans Gustaf Wessberg, supported by the Head of his office, Peter Eklund and Emmanuel-Douglas Hellinakis, Attaché; Sabine Hiernaux-Fritsch, Principal Manager; Laura Gores, Head of Task; Erika Soveges and Alexandre Tan, auditors.
Fra venstre mod hżjre: Emmanuel-Douglas Hellinakis, Sabine Hiernaux-Fritsch, Hans Gustaf Wessberg, Laura Gores, Alexandre Tan, Erika Soveges og Peter Eklund. 
From left to right: E.-D. Hellinakis, S. Hiernaux-Fritsch, H. G. Wessberg, L. Gores, A. Tan, E. Soveges, P. Eklund.
Indhold 03 Punkt Akronymer I-VII Resum 1-8 Indledning 9-11 Revisionens omfang og revisionsmetoden 12-67 Bemžrkninger 12-47 Budgetstżtten havde begržnset effekt med hensyn til at styrke den offentlige administration i mlsektorerne 13-28 Kommissionen kunne have reageret hurtigere p risici, og programmerne var ikke i tilstržkkelig grad tilpasset til de nationale strategier 29-34 Mulighederne for at sžtte betingelser blev ikke udnyttet tilstržkkeligt 35-37 Tildelingen af supplerende incitamentsbaserede midler var ikke begrundet tilstržkkeligt 38-47 Der var kun begržnset bevis p fremskridt i de sektorer, SBS var rettet mod 48-67 Projekterne bidrog delvist til at styrke den offentlige administration 49-51 Projekterne var relevante, men behovsanalyserne var behžftet med svagheder 52-63 Projekterne var ikke altid koordineret godt nok med SBS-programmerne 64-67 Resultaterne var ikke altid bžredygtige som fżlge af manglende politisk vilje og andre eksterne faktorer 68-77 Konklusioner og anbefalinger Bilag I Bilag II Ń Oversigt over de kontrollerede kontrakter Ń Sammenfatning af bedżmmelserne af sektorbudgetstżttekontrakter i revisionsstikprżven Bilag III Kommissionens og EU-Udenrigstjenestens svar Ń Sammenfatning af bedżmmelserne af projektkontrakter i revisionsstikprżven Akronymer 04 ENI: det europžiske naboskabsinstrument. 
Contents 03 Paragraph Acronyms I-VII Executive summary 1-8 Introduction 9-11 Audit scope and approach 12-67 Observations 12-47 Budget support had a limited effect in strengthening the public administration in the sectors targeted 13-28 The Commission could have responded more quickly to risks and programmes were not sufficiently aligned to national strategies 29-34 Conditionality was not sufficiently exploited 35-37 Additional incentive‐based funds were not well justified 38-47 There was only limited evidence of progress in the sectors targeted by SBS 48-67 The projects partially contributed towards strengthening the public administration 49-51 The projects were relevant, but needs analyses were impaired by weaknesses 52-63 The projects were not always well‐coordinated with SBS programmes 64-67 The results were not always sustainable due to lack of political will and other external factors 68-77 Conclusions and recommendations Annex I Annex II Annex III — List of contracts audited — Summary ratings of sector budet support contracts in the audit sample — Summary ratings of project contracts in the audit sample Replies of the Commission and the EEAS
Resum 05 IRepublikken Moldova er det fattigste land i Europa. 
Executive 05 summary IThe Republic of Moldova is the poorest country in Europe.
Siden 2007 har landet fet tildelt 782 millioner euro i bistand gennem de europžiske naboskabsinstrumenter. 
Since 2007, it has been allocated aid amounting to 782 million euros through the European neighbourhood instruments.
Det svarer til nžsten 37 euro pr. indbygger rligt, hvilket er det hżjeste belżb i alle EUŐs żstlige nabolande. 
This represents annually nearly 37 euros per inhabitant — the highest amount in all of the EU’s eastern neighbours.
I 2014 undertegnede EU og Moldova en associeringsaftale, der blandt andet omfattede et vidtgende og bredt frihandelsomrde. 
In 2014, Moldova and the EU signed an association agreement, including provision for a deep and comprehensive free trade area.
II Blandt Moldovas stżrste problemer er udbredt korruption og svage offentlige institutioner, og at bidrage til at afhjžlpe disse problemer har siden 2007 vžret et vigtigt element i EUŐs bistand. 
II Among Moldova’s main problems are widespread corruption and the weakness of its public institutions, which have been an important element of EU assistance since 2007.
En vžsentlig del af stżtten gives i form af budgetstżtte. 
A significant share of the aid comes in the form of budget support.
Det indebžrer, at der overfżres midler til partnerlandets statskasse p betingelse af, at visse betingelser er opfyldt. 
This involves the transfer of funds to the partner country’s national treasury on condition that certain requirements are satisfied.
Den resterende stżtte kanaliseres via projekter. 
The remaining aid is channelled through projects.
III Vi undersżgte, om EUŐs bistand havde bidraget effektivt til at styrke den offentlige administration. 
III We examined whether EU assistance had contributed effectively towards strengthening the public administration.
Vores stikprżve omfattede fire budgetstżtteprogrammer inden for omrderne retsvžsen, offentlige finanser, folkesundhed og vand. 
Our sample covered four budget support programmes in the sectors of justice, public finance, public health and water.
Den omfattede ogs tyve projekter i forskellige offentlige myndigheder. 
It also included 20 projects in various public authorities.
IV Vi konkluderede, at EUŐs bistand kun delvist bidrog til at styrke den offentlige administration. 
IV We concluded that EU assistance only partially contributed to strengthening the public administration.
Nogle af de mangler, Retten konstaterede, kan forklares med eksterne faktorer. 
External factors explained a number of the shortcomings observed.
Andre kunne tilskrives svagheder i udformningen og gennemfżrelsen af de reviderede programmer og projekter. 
Others could be attributed to weaknesses in the design and implementation of the audited programmes and projects.
VDer var kun gjort ringe fremskridt i mlsektorerne, og vi konkluderede derfor, at budgetstżtten havde begržnset effekt med hensyn til at styrke den offentlige administration. 
VSince little progress had been made in the sectors targeted, we concluded that budget support had a limited effect in strengthening the public administration.
Kommissionen kunne have reageret hurtigere, nr stżtterelaterede risici materialiserede sig. 
The Commission could have responded more quickly when risks associated with the support materialised.
Programmerne var ikke tilstržkkeligt tilpasset til Moldovas strategier. 
Programmes were not sufficiently aligned to Moldovan strategies.
Programmernes potentielle fordele blev reduceret, fordi Kommissionen ikke fuldt ud udnyttede mulighederne for at opstille forhndsbetingelser for udbetaling af midler. 
The potential benefit of the programmes was reduced by the fact that the Commission did not make full use of its ability to set preconditions for disbursement.
Visse specifikke betingelser blev opfyldt i perioden mellem programforhandlingerne og sektorbudgetstżttens start eller kunne ikke mles direkte. 
Some specific conditions were fulfilled between programme negotiation and the start of the sector budget support or were not directly measurable.
Kommissionen kunne have vžret strengere, nr den vurderede, om betingelserne var opfyldt. 
The Commission could have been more stringent when assessing whether they had been fulfilled.
Heller ikke ydelsen af supplerende incitamentsbaserede midler var fuldstžndig begrundet. 
Also, the granting of additional incentive-based funds was not fully justified.
Resum 06 VI Vi konstaterede, at projektudformningen generelt var relevant. 
Executive summary 06 VI Project designs were generally found to be relevant.
Den EU-bistand, der blev kanaliseret gennem projekter, var delvis effektiv med hensyn til at styrke den offentlige administration. 
EU assistance channelled through projects was partially effective in strengthening the public administration.
Omfanget og timingen af projekterne i denne sammenhžng var ikke altid godt nok koordineret med budgetstżtteprogrammerne. 
In this connection, the scope and timing of projects was not always well coordinated with budget support programmes.
Den specifikke budgetstżtterelaterede tekniske bistand til udvikling af den administrative kapacitet kom fżrst flere mneder efter selve budgetstżtteprogrammet. 
The specific, budget support-related, technical assistance for the development of administrative capacity did not start until months after the main budget support programme.
Der blev ikke altid anvendt anden teknisk bistand og twinningprojekter til at forberede eller understżtte budgetstżtteprogrammerne. 
Other technical assistance and twinning projects were not always used to prepare or support budget support programmes.
Projekterne leverede generelt de forventede output. 
Projects generally delivered the expected outputs.
Men resultaterne var ikke altid bžredygtige p grund af manglende politisk vilje og andre eksterne faktorer. 
However, the results were not always sustainable due to lack of political will and other external factors.
VII Vi fremsžtter en ržkke anbefalinger til Kommissionen med henblik p at gżre EUŐs bistand til Moldova mere effektiv. 
VII We make a number of recommendations for the Commission to improve the effectiveness of EU assistance to Moldova.
Indledning 07 01 Moldova ligger i det sydżstlige Europa mellem Rumžnien og Ukraine og har 3,6 millioner indbyggere. 
Introduction 07 01 Moldova is located in south-eastern Europe, between Romania and Ukraine, with a population of 3.6 million.
Landet blev en uafhžngig republik i 1991 efter Sovjetunionens oplżsning. Regionen Transnistrien har imidlertid ensidigt erklžret sin uafhžngighed og regeres fortsat sžrskilt. 
It emerged as an independent republic in 1991, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, although the region of Transnistria had unilaterally declared independence and is still governed separately.
02 Efter en lang periode med żkonomisk tilbagegang begyndte den moldoviske żkonomi igen at vokse i 1998. 
02 After a protracted period of economic decline, the Moldovan economy started growing again in 1998.
Med et BNP pr. indbygger p 1 687 euro og en fattigdomssats p 12,7 % er det imidlertid fortsat det fattigste land i Europa1. 
Nevertheless, with a per capita GDP of 1 687 euros, and a poverty rate of 12.7 %, it is still the poorest country in Europe1.
Moldovas befolkning er faldet siden uafhžngigheden, hvilket primžrt skyldes lave fżdselstal og en hżj arbejdskraftmigration, og pengeoverfżrsler er kommet til at spille en vigtig rolle i det sociale og żkonomiske liv. 
Moldova’s population has decreased since independence, due primarily to low birth rates and high labour migration, and remittances have come to play an important role in its social and economic life.
03 Moldova og EU indgik fżrste gang aftalemžssige forbindelser i 1994 i form af en partnerskabs-og samarbejdsaftale. 
03 Moldova and the EU first established contractual relations in 1994, through a partnership and cooperation agreement.
I juni 2014 undertegnede de en associeringsaftale, der blandt andet omfattede et vidtgende og bredt frihandelsomrde. 
In June 2014, they signed an association agreement, which included a deep and comprehensive free trade area.
Denne aftale har til forml at forbedre de politiske og żkonomiske forbindelser og gradvis integrere Moldova i EUŐs indre marked. 
This agreement aims to improve political and economic relations and gradually integrate Moldova into the EU‘s internal market.
Frihandelsomrdet indebžrer, at toldtariffer og -kvoter fjernes, og at love og forskrifter harmoniseres med dem, der gžlder i EU i forskellige handelssektorer. 
The free trade area provides for removing customs tariffs and quotas and harmonising laws and regulations with those in the EU in various trade sectors.
Ifżlge Europa-Parlamentet har Moldova Čet europžisk fremtidsperspektiv og kan ansżge om at blive medlem af Den Europžiske Union, sfremt landet overholder de demokratiske principper, respekterer de grundlžggende frihedsrettigheder og mindretalsrettighederne samt sikrer retsstaten2Ç. 
According to the European Parliament, Moldova ‘has a European perspective and may apply to become a member of the European Union provided it adheres to the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law’2.
04 EU samarbejder med Moldova under den europžiske naboskabspolitik (ENP), og mere specifikt ENPŐs żstlige regionale dimension, Det Żstlige Partnerskab. 
04 The EU cooperates with Moldova under the European neighbourhood policy (ENP) and, more specifically, its eastern regional dimension, the eastern partnership.
Det europžiske naboskabsinstrument (ENI) er et EU-finansieringsinstrument, som specifikt er rettet mod naboskabsomrdet i perioden 2014-2020. 
The European neighbourhood instrument (ENI) is an EU financial instrument dedicated to the neighbourhood for the 2014-2020 period.
Det har erstattet det europžiske naboskabs-og partnerskabsinstrument (ENPI), som džkkede perioden 2007-2013. 
It replaced the 2007-2013 European neighbourhood and partnership instrument (ENPI).
I perioden 2007-2015 er der tildelt 782 millioner euro i bilateral stżtte til Moldova3. 
Under these schemes, 782 million euros in bilateral aid have been allocated to Moldova from 2007 to 20153.
I 2014 belżb stżtten sig til nžsten 37 euro pr. indbygger, hvilket er det hżjeste belżb i alle EUŐs żstlige nabolande4. 
In 2014, aid amounted to nearly 37 euros per inhabitant — the highest amount in all of the EU’s eastern neighbours4.
1 BNP pr. indbygger i 2014 fra Eurostat (www.ec.europa.eu/ eurostat/statistics-explained/ index.php/European_ Neighbourhood_Policy_-_ East_-_economic_statistics); fattigdomssats i 2013 ifżlge Verdensbankens seneste tilgžngelige indikatorer for verdens udvikling (http://data. worldbank.org). 
1 Per capita GDP in 2014 from Eurostat (www.ec.europa.eu/ eurostat/statistics-explained/ index.php/European_ Neighbourhood_Policy_-_ East_-_economic_statistics); Poverty rate in 2013, according to the latest available World Bank World Development Indicators (http://data. worldbank.org).
2 Europa-Parlamentet, Udvalget om Udenrigsanliggender, Betžnkning med et forslag til ikke-lovgivningsmžssig beslutning om udkast til Rdets afgżrelse om indgelse p Den Europžiske Unions vegne af associeringsaftalen mellem Den Europžiske Union og Det Europžiske Atomenergifžllesskab og deres medlemsstater p den ene side og Republikken Moldova p den anden side, A8-0022/2014, 21.10.2014. 
2 European Parliament, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Report containing a motion for a non‐legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, A8-0022/2014, 21.10.2014.
3 I den samme periode blev der indget aftale om stżtte til et belżb af 547 millioner euro og udbetalt 363 millioner euro. 
3 Over the same period, aid contracted amounted to 547 million euros and aid paid to 363 million euros.
Moldova har ogs modtaget stżtte gennem regionale projekter under ENPIŐs gržnseoverskridende samarbejde, makrofinansiel bistand, naboskabsinveste-ringsfaciliteten, instrumentet til finansiering af udviklingssamarbejde, Det Europžiske Instrument for Demokrati og Menneskerettigheder og stabilitetsinstrumentet. 
Moldova also received aid through regional projects under ENPI cross border cooperation, macro-financial assistance, the Neighbourhood Investment Facility, the Development Cooperation Instrument, the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the Instrument for Stability.
4 De żstlige lande i ENP er Armenien, Aserbajdsjan, Hviderusland, Georgien, Moldova og Ukraine. 
4 The eastern countries in the ENP are Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine.
Indledning 08 05 Et af Moldovas hovedproblemer er den svage offentlige administration. 
Introduction 08 05 One of the main problems affecting Moldova is the weakness of its public administration.
De offentlige institutioner lider under et alt for stort bureaukrati, manglende fokus p kernefunktioner, stor personaleudskiftning og dermed lav effektivitet. 
Public institutions suffer from excessive bureaucracy, a lack of focus on core functions, a high turnover of staff, and, consequently, low efficiency.
103 ud af 168 i Transparency Internationals indeks for iagttaget korruption for 2015. 
Corruption also remains an issue, with Moldova ranking 103rd out of 168 in the 2015 Transparency International corruption perceptions index.