natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvis disse krav overholdes, kan man 2 finde fuldstžndig dokumentation om alle kreaturer i databasen. () Sžrberetning nr. 
If these requirements are respected the database could provide complete documentation on each bovine animal.
19/98 om Fžllesskabets finansiering af visse foranstaltninger truffet som fżlge af BSE-krisen, med Kommissionens svar 3 (EFT C 383 af 9.12.1998). () Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 
Special Report No 19/1998 concerning the Community financing of certain measures taken as a result of the BSE crisis, accompanied by the replies of the Commission (OJ C 383, 9.12.1998).
2630/97 af 29. december 1997 (EFT L 354 af 30.12.1997, s. 23). I risikoanalysen skal der tages hensyn til antallet af dyr p bedriften, folke-og dyresundhedsforhold og tidligere sygdomsudbrud, det belżb, som bedriften gżr krav p og/eller fr udbetalt i oksekżdspržmier, sammenholdt med det belżb, der blev udbetalt det foregende r, andre vžsentlige žndringer og resultaterne af tidligere rs kontrol (f.eks. om besžtningsregistrene har 4 vžret fżrt korrekt, og om passene har vžret i orden). () Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2630/97 of 29 December 1997 (OJL354,30.12.1997,p.23).Theriskanalysismusttakeintoaccount the number of animals on the holdings; public and animal health considerations and any previous existence or outbreak of disease, the amount of bovine premium claimed/paid in comparison to previous years, other significant changes and the results of checks conducted in earlier years (e.g. the proper keeping of herd registers and passports).
494/98 af 27. februar 1998 om gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser til Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 820/97 for s vidt angr anvendelsen af administrative minimumssanktioner i forbindelse med ordningen for identifikation og registrering af kvžg (EFT L 60 af 28.2.1998). 
Commission Regulation (EC) No 494/98 of 27 February 1998 (OJ L 60, 28.2.1998) laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 820/1997 as regards the application of minimum administrative sanctions in the framework of the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals.
5 ( ) Selv om en landbruger ikke dyrker markafgrżder, skal han anmelde sit foderareal for at vžre stżtteberettiget til husdyrstżtte (undtagelses-regler gžlder kun for sm bedrifter). 
5 ( ) Even if a farmer has no arable crops, he must declare his forage areas to be eligible for the animal aids (exemption rules apply for small farms only).
31.7.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 214/13 25. 
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/13 25.
Produktiviteten af den manuelle administrative kontrol afhžnger direkte af kvaliteten af de menneskelige ressourcer og de anvendte procedurer, mens produktiviteten af den automatiserede kontrol afhžnger af kvaliteten af de grundlžggende data (det alfanumeriske system til identifikation af marker og kvžg) samt af, hvor mange oplysninger der er tilgžngelige i computerprogram-merne, og hvor hżjt udviklede disse programmer er. 
The efficiency of the manual administrative checks is directly dependent on the quality of the human resources available and the procedures applied. With regard to automated checks, the efficiency depends on the quality of the basic data (alphanumerical system of identification of parcels and bovine animals), on the amount of information made available in the applications and the level of development of the computer programs.
Med hensyn til arealstżtte er de vigtigste forhold, der undersżges ved hjžlp af automatiseret kontrol, om markerne er stżtteberettigede, om de faktisk eksisterer, om den anmeldte arealstżrrelse er korrekt, og om der foretages dobbeltbetaling, dvs. om det samme areal optržder i mere end n ansżgning. 
As far as areas are concerned, the main automated checks are eligibility checks on the parcels, checks to ensure they actually exist, checks on the surface area and checks to ensure there are no duplications, i.e. verifying that the same area does not appear in more than one application.
Med hensyn til kvžg er de vigtigste forhold, der undersżges ved hjžlp af automatiseret kontrol, om dyrene er stżtteberettigede (alder, kżn, race (kun ammekżer), verificering af żremžrke-numre), og om der foretages uberettiget dobbeltbetaling, dvs. om den samme stżtte ydes flere gange for et enkelt dyr, eller om der ydes flere former for stżtte for et enkelt dyr. 
For bovine animals, the main automated checks are eligibility checks on the animal (age, sex, breed in the case of suckler cows, the existence of the number allocated) and checks to ensure thereisnounjustifiedduplication,i.e.ensuringthatananimal does not benefit from the same aid several times or from different forms of aid.
Efter overgangsperiodens ophżr skulle det ikke kunne lade sig gżre, at der betales stżtte, fżr en ansżgning har vžret igennem alle computerfiltrene, og alle usždvanlige forhold er afklaret. 
Since the end of the transitional period it should be impossible for payment to be made against an application before it has passed through all the computer filters and before any anomalies have been resolved.
Det er ogs vigtigt, at medlemsstaterne registrerer de usždvanlige forhold, som er konstateret i forbindelse med tidligere administrativ kontrol og kontrol p stedet, s fejl, som er afdžkket de foregende r, ikke gentages (2). 
It is also important that Member States register anomalies found during previous administrative controls and field inspections to make sure that errors identified in the preceding years are not repeated (2).
Kontrol p stedet 29. 
Field inspections 29.
Det vigtigste forml med kontrol p stedet er at kontrollere, at de oplysninger, som landbrugerne har givet i deres stżtteansżgninger, stemmer overens med virkeligheden. 
The main role of field inspections is to check that statements made by the farmers in their aid applications tally with reality.
Kontrollen p stedet skal džkke mindst 5 % af ansżgningerne om arealstżtte og 10 % af ansżgningerne om husdyrstżtte (3). 
Field inspections must cover at least 5 % of ÔareaŐ aid applications and 10 % of ÔlivestockŐ aid applications (3).
De ansżgninger, der skal kontrolleres, udvžlges p grundlag af en risikoanalyse og ved anvendelse af en faktor, der sikrer, at de er repržsentative for de indgivne stżtteansżgninger (4). 
Selection for inspection should be on the basis of a risk analysis together with an element of representativeness of the aid applications submitted (4).
Kontrolprocenten skal żges, hvis der konstateres vžsentlige uregelmžssigheder i en region eller en del af en region. 
The rate of control should be increased if on-the-spot checks reveal significant irregularities in a region or part of a region.
Kontrollen sker uanmeldt og omfatter alle de marker eller dyr, som den enkelte landbruger har sżgt om stżtte for (5). 
Inspections should be unannounced and cover all the agricultural parcels and animals covered by one or more applications (5).
I figur 5 vises procenten af ansżgninger, som medlemsstaterne kontrollerede for hver stżtteordning i 1998. 
See Illustration 5 for the rate of inspection for each aid scheme in the Member States for 1998.
Fysisk eller traditionel kontrol p stedet af ansżgninger om arealstżtte kan erstattes af telemling. 
Physical or traditional field inspections of area aid applications can be replaced by remote sensing.
Medlemsstaterne identificerer afgrżderne og mler arealerne ved hjžlp af satellitbilleder og luftfotos. 
In this case Member States interpret satellite images or aerial photographs in order to recognise the crop and measure the area.
Der bżr udfżres traditionel kontrol p stedet, hvis det ved telemlingen konstateres, at der kan vžre forkerte oplysninger i anmeldelserne. 
Traditional field inspections should be carried out if the remote sensing identifies potential inaccuracies in the claims.
Kvaliteten af kontrollen p stedet afhžnger direkte af kvaliteten af risikoanalysen, kontrollżrernes kvalifikationer, omfanget af den udfżrte kontrol og den anvendte mleteknik (nr det gžlder marker). 
The quality of the field inspections is directly dependent on the quality of the risk analysis, the quality of the controllers, the scope of the checks carried out and the measuring technique applied (in the case of the agricultural parcels).
1 () Rdets forordning (EŻF) nr. 1765/92 af 30. juni 1992 om indfżrelse af en stżtteordning for producenter af visse markafgrżder, artikel 9, 2 stk. 
1 () Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 of 30 June 1992 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops, Article 9, first 2 paragraph. () For example, land declared as arable land by a producer, which was found on inspection to be permanent forage area, or even building land or lakes Ń these parcels will not be eligible in future and should therefore be included in a database allowing an efficient cross-check for future claims.
820/97. () I risikoanalysen skal der tages hensyn til stżttebelżbet, antallet af marker eller dyr, žndringer i forhold til det foregende r, resultaterne af tidligere rs kontrol, andre faktorer, som fastlžgges af medlemsstaten, 5 og overtrždelser af forordning (EF) nr. 820/97 (med hensyn til kvžg). () Ved kontrol p stedet af marker udtages der en stikprżve under hensyntagen til de tolerancer, som medlemsstaten har fastlagt, og markernes stżtteberettigelse kontrolleres. Fżr 1999 fandtes der ikke noget dokument, der beskrev omfanget af kontrollen af kvžg. 
(3) According to Article 6(3a) (applicable from 1 January 2000) of Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92, Member States can decide to reduce the rate of inspection from 10 % to 5 % where a fully operational computerised database in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) 4 No 820/97 has been in place for at least one year. () The risk analysis should take into account the amount of aid involved, the number of parcels or animals, changes from the previous year, the findings of checks made in the past, other factors to be defined by the Member State and infringements of Regulation (EC) No 820/97 (for 5 bovine animals). () Regarding the inspection of agricultural parcels, a sample should be measured in accordance with the tolerances set by the Member State and their eligibility should be checked. As far as bovine animals are concerned, before 1999 no document existed explaining the scope of the controls to be carried out.
I 1999 blev Kommissionens gennemfżrelsesforordning imidlertid žndret. 
As from 1999, the CommissionŐs implementing Regulation was completed.
I henhold til forordningen skal kontrollen p stedet af ansżgninger om husdyrstżtte omfatte for det fżrste kontrol af det samlede antal dyr p bedriften, for det andet kontrol p grundlag af besžtningsregistret for at sikre, at alle de dyr, der er indgivet ansżgninger for inden for de sidste tolv mneder forud for kontrollen, blev holdt p bedriften i hele den foreskrevne periode, for det tredje kontrol af en stikprżve af besžtningsregistret omfattende sammenligning med fakturaer og vete-rinžrdokumenter samt for det fjerde kontrol af, at alt kvžg er identificeret ved hjžlp af żremžrker og pas og er opfżrt i registret. 
Thus, the on-the-spot checks of livestock aid applications should include a check of the total number of animals present on the holding, a check of the register to ensure that all the animals for which aid applications were submitted in the prior 12 months have been kept during the retention period(s), a sample check of the register against supporting documents, such as invoices, veterinary certificates, etc., a check of all bovine animals, and their identification by eartags, passports and on the register.
C 214/14 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 31.7.2001 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Arealstżtte Sžrlig oksekżdspržmie Ammekopržmie Figur 5 Kontrolbesżgi1998 NB: Gržkenland żgede procenten af kontrolbesżg mht. kvžgpržmier i et forsżg p at kompensere for alvorlige svagheder i de żvrige dele af IFKS. 
C 214/14 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Area aid Special beef Suckler cow Illustration 5 Inspection rates in 1998 NB: Greece increased its inspection rate for bovine premiums in an attempt to compensate for serious weaknesses in the other elements of IACS.
Kilde: Basisdata fra Kommissionen Ń Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug (IFKS-statistikker for 1998). 
Source: Basic data obtained from Commission DG AGRI (IACS statistics for 1998).
Sanktioner 32. 
Sanctions 32.
Konstateres det i forbindelse med administrativ kontrol eller kontrol p stedet, at der er forkerte oplysninger i en ansżgning, er det fastsat i forordningerne, at ansżgningen blot korrigeres, hvis forskellen er under en vis gržnse, mens der plžgges sanktioner efter en progressiv skala (jf. bilaget), hvis forskellen er over denne gržnse. 
If discrepancies are noted during an administrative or an on-the-spot control, the Regulations stipulate that either a simple amendmentshallbemadetotheapplication,ifthediscrepancy is below a certain threshold, or sanctions shall be imposed according to a graduated scale if the discrepancy exceeds this threshold (see the Annex).
Reglerne for plžggelse af sanktioner i forbindelse med kvžg blev vžsentligt žndret i 1999, da der blev indfżrt sanktioner for dyr, som der ikke er sżgt om stżtte for, og sanktioner blev udvidet til at gžlde al stżtte i forbindelse med ansżgninger, der er indgivet i lżbet af de tolv mneder forud for kontrollen (1). 
The rules for sanctions for bovine animals were changed significantly in 1999, with the introduction of sanctions for animals not actually claimed for premium, and by increasing the scope of sanctions to include claims for which premium was granted in the previous 12 months (1).
Hvis det i forbindelse med en kontrol konstateres, at der uberettiget er betalt stżtte i et eller flere tidligere r, skal disse belżb desuden inkasseres med tilbagevirkende kraft (2) fra den fżrste urigtige anmeldelse. 
In addition, if a control reveals that aid has been paid without justification over one or more of the previous years, the amounts must be recovered retroactively (2) with effect from the first false declaration.
KOMMISSIONENS ROLLE Indledning 33. 
THE ROLE OF THE COMMISSION Introduction 33.
1678/98 af 29. juli 1998 (EFT L 212 af 30.7.1998, s. 
This involves interpreting (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1678/98 of 29 July 1998 (OJ L 212, 30.7.1998, p.
(2) Kommissionens arbejdsdokument DOC VI/629/98. sl žndringer af forordningerne, nr det er relevant. 
(2) Commission working document, Doc.
Kommissionen skal derfor fortolke forordningerne og vejlede medlemsstaterne, indhente oplysninger om, hvordan medlemsstaterne gennemfżrer IFKS, samt evaluere systemet og fżre tilsyn med gennemfżrelsen. 
VI/629/98. the Regulations and providing guidance to Member States; gathering information on how IACS is implemented by the Member States; evaluating and enforcing the implementation of IACS by the Member States.
Siden 1997 har denne opgave vžret varetaget af direktoratet for regnskabsafslutning. 
Since 1997, this task has been given to the Clearance-of-Accounts Directorate.
Ansvaret for de tekniske aspekter ved telemling og elektroniske identifikationssystemer blev overdraget Det Fžlles Forskningscenter ISPRA (Instituttet for Systemteknik, Informatik og Sikkerhed). 
Responsibility for technical aspects dealing with remote-sensing and electronic identification systems was transferred to the Joint Research Centre in ISPRA (Institute for Systems, Informatics and Safety).
Generaldirektoratets markedsenheder for oksekżd og korn-afgrżder er ogs indirekte involverede i gennemfżrelsen af IFKS, for de fr forelagt žndringer af forordningerne til udtalelse, og de udtaler sig ogs om, hvordan markedsspecifikke forordninger, som indvirker direkte p IFKS, skal fortolkes. 
The market sections of DG AGRI for beef and veal and cereals are also indirectly involved in the implementation of IACS because they are consulted on regulatory changes and provide assistance on the interpretation of market-specific regulations which have a direct influence on the operation of IACS.
En IFKS-ekspertkomit bestende af repržsentanter for medlemsstaterne og Kommissionen mżdes to eller tre gange om ret. 
An IACS Expert Committee, composed of representatives of the Member States and the Commission, meets two or three times a year.
Komitens Belgien Danmark Tyskland Gržkenland Spanien Frankrig Irland Italien Luxembourg Nederlandene Żstrig Portugal Finland Sverige Det Forenede Kongerige EU-15 
Belgium Denmark Germany Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Austria Portugal Finland Sweden United Kingdom EU-15
31.7.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 214/15 vžsentligste opgave er at behandle žndringer af IFKS-forordningerne. 
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/15 The main role of the Committee is to discuss changes to IACS Regulations.
Generaldirektoratet for Sundhed og Forbrugerbeskyttelse 36. 
The Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General (DG SANCO) 36.
Der blev indfżrt detaljerede regler for identifikation og registrering af kvžg (jf. punkt 16-19). I henhold til IFKS-forordningerne er overholdelse af disse regler en betingelse for stżtteberettigelse til husdyrpržmier, og der er mange krydshenvisninger og ligheder mellem de to sžt forordninger. 
Following the BSE crisis, responsibility for veterinary mea-sureswastransferredtoDGSANCOin1997.Detailedbovine identification and registration rules were introduced (see para-graphs16to19).IACSRegulationsrequiretheserulestobecom- plied with as a condition of eligibility for animal premiums, and there are many cross references and similarities between the two sets of Regulations.
For eksempel er det fastsat i forordningerne, at fejl, der er konstateret af de nationale veterinžrmyndigheder i forbindelse med kontrol af identifikation og registrering af kvžg, skal meddeles de myndigheder, der er ansvarlige for IFKS-kontrollen, og omvendt. 
For example, it is a regulatory requirement that errors found on bovine identification and registration inspections carried out by national veterinary services should be notified to the authorities responsible for IACS inspections, and vice versa.
Kommissionen udarbejder derfor fortolkninger af forordningerne til medlemsstaterne og undertiden vejledninger og anbefalinger af mere generel karakter (1). 
The Commission therefore provides Member States with interpretations of the Regulations, and occasionally with more general guidance and recommendations (1).
Forordningerne er žndret mange gange i takt med udbygningen af IFKS og de žndringer, der er sket i selve kontrolsystemet og i bestemmelserne for de stżtteordninger, som systemet kontrollerer. 
The Regulations have been amended many times to reflect increases in the scope of IACS, changes to the provisions of the aid schemes which it controls and changes to the control system itself.
Alle disse žndringer gżr arbejdet svžrere for dem, der beskžftiger sig med IFKS (landbrugerne og de nationale myndigheder, herunder inspektżrer og dem, der udarbejder informati-onssystemer). 
All these changes complicate the work of those dealing with IACS (farmers and the national administrations, including information system developers and inspectors).
Figur 6 viser, at de vigtigste forordninger blev žndret 80 gange mellem 1992 og 1999. 
Illustration 6 shows that the main Regulations were modified 80 times between 1992 and 1999.
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Figur 6 Forordningsžndringer fra 1992 til 1999 10 9 19 11 31 Kilde: EUŐs CELEX-database. 
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source: The EU CELEX database.
805/68 Gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser til forordningen om dyrepržmier, forordning (EŻF) nr. 3886/92 (1) Direktoratet for regnskabsafslutning udarbejder fortolkninger af IFKS-forordningerne. Markedsenhederne udarbejder fortolkninger af de specifikke forordninger om ordningerne for husdyrstżtte og arealstżtte. 
Implementation Rules for Animal Premiums Regulation(EEC) No 3886/92 Illustration 6 Changes to the Regulations between 1992 and 1999 10 9 19 11 31 Basic IACS Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 Implementation rules for IACS Regulation (EEC)No3887/92 Area Aid Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 Basic Animal Premiums Regulation (EEC) No805/68 (1) The Clearance-of-Accounts Directorate issues interpretations of IACS Regulations. The market sections issue interpretations relating to the specific animal and area aid schemes.
De fleste anmodninger om fortolkninger fremsžttes, nr forordninger er blevet žndret. 
Most requests for interpretation follow changes in the Regulations.
Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug, direktorat B-1, fżrer register over fortolkningerne. 
A register of interpretations is kept by DG AGRI-B-1.
Med mellemrum bliver nyligt udarbejdede fortolkninger samlet og udleveret til alle medlemsstater i IFKS-ekspertkomiten og EUGFL-komiten. 
Recently-issued interpretations have been periodically grouped together and distributed to all Member States at IACS expert group, and at the EAGGF Committee.
Antal žndringer 
Number of changes
C 214/16 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 31.7.2001 Ledelsesinformation 39. 
C 214/16 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 Management information 39.
Kommissionen kan kun fżre tilsyn med medlemsstaternes gennemfżrelse af IFKS, hvis de rettidigt indsender relevante og plidelige oplysninger ssom statistikker om stżtteansżgninger, statistikker om administrativ kontrol og kontrol p stedet og situationsrapporter om gennemfżrelsen. 
In order to monitor the effective implementation of IACS by the Member States, the Commission needs relevant and reliable information on a timely basis from Member States, covering such subjects as aid application statistics, administrative and on-the-spot control statistics, and reports on progress with implementation.
Sdanne oplysninger gżr det muligt for Kommissionen at mlrette sine kontrolbesżg i medlemsstaterne bedre, og oplysningerne har afgżrende betydning for budget-og markedsforvaltningen. Ud over de oplysninger, Kom-missionenindhenterviadrżftelserneiIFKS-ekspertkomitenogi forbindelse med kontrolbesżg, fr den fżrst og fremmest fżlgende oplysningerframedlemsstaterne: a) Oplysninger om de foranstaltninger, der er truffet for at gennemfżre IFKS (1). 
Such information enables the Commission to better target missions to Member States, and is essential for budgetary and market management. Apart from its discussions at IACS Expert Committee and information obtained while undertaking audit visits, the main information the Commission receives from the Member States is: (a) information on measures taken to implement IACS (1).
Kommissionen skal have ajourfżrte oplysninger om de nationale foranstaltninger til gennemfżrelse af IFKS. b) Statistikker om oksekżdspržmier (2) og anmeldte arealer (3). c) Ikke-lovbestemte statistikker om stżtteansżgninger, administrativ kontrol og kontrol p stedet vedrżrende ordningerne for arealstżtte og husdyrpržmier, kaldet IFKS-statistikker (obligatoriske fra 2000 (4). d) De attesterende organers rlige rapporter om de udbetalende organer, som skal tilsendes Kommissionen senest 10. februar det fżlgende r (5). e) Rapporter om kontrolbesżg vedrżrende identifikation og registrering af kvžg (6). Den fżrste rapport skulle indsendes senest 1. juli 1999. 
This was intended to provide the Commission with up-to-date information on the national measures taken to implement IACS; (b) statistics for bovine premiums (2) and areas declared (3); (c) non-regulatory statistics on aid applications, administrative and on-the-spot controls, for area aid and animal premium schemes, called IACS statistics (these have become obligatory from 2000 (4)); (d) annual reports by certifying bodies on paying agencies which should be submitted to the Commission by 10 February of the following year (5); (e) reports on inspections relating to bovine identification and registration (6): the first report was due for 1 July 1999.
Evaluering af IFKS og tilsynet med gennemfżrelsen 40. 
Evaluation of IACS and enforcing implementation 40.