natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den anden BSE-krise begyndte. 
Start of second BSE crisis.
ŽndringafKommissionensbeslutning2000/418/EFŃudvidelseafSRM-listentilat omfatte alle tarme fra kvžg, uanset dyrenes alder. Oktober-december 2000 27.december2000 
Amendment of Decision 2000/418/EC Ń extension of SRM to include entire intestines of all bovine animals of any age.
20.11.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 324/31 KOMMISSIONENS SVAR SŽRBERETNINGENS VŽSENTLIGSTE KONKLUSIONER 1. 
20.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 324/31 THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES FOLLOW UP TO THE COURTŐS SPECIAL REPORT ON BSE 1.
Kommissionen har altid ment, at kampen mod BSE skulle prioriteres hżjt. 
The Commission has always accepted that combating BSE is a priority.
Kommissionen har, lige siden Europa-Parlamentets undersżgelsesudvalg fremlagde sin betžnkning i 1997, gjort sit yderste for at sikre, at Kommissionens tiltag fulgte en overordnet strategi. 
It has made a particular effort, ever since the report of the Committee of Inquiry of the European Parliament 1997, to ensure that its measures took place within a coherent strategy framework.
Kommissionen har gennemfżrt bredt anlagte initiativer (oprettelsen af Generaldirektoratet for Sundhed og Forbrugerbeskyttelse, offentliggżrelsen af hvidbogen om fżdevaresikkerhed, forslaget om oprettelse af en Europžisk Fżdevareautoritet osv.). 
In particular, the Commission has carried out wide-ranging initiatives (creation of the Directorate General for Health and Consumer Protection (SANCO), publication of the White Paper on Food Safety, proposed Food Authority, etc.).
Disse initiativer skal ligeledes ses p baggrund af de styrkede befżjelser vedrżrende dyrs og menneskers sundhed, som blev indfżrt med Amsterdam-traktaten, bl.a. udvidelsen af den fžlles beslutningsprocedure til at omfatte forslag inden for dette omrde. 
These initiatives, in turn, need to be viewed in the light of the increased powers in relation to veterinary and public health measures introduced in the Treaty of Amsterdam, including the extension of co-decision to proposals in this field.
Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret fżrer nżje tilsyn med, at medlemsstaterne overholder reglerne. 
Their implementation by the Member States is also closely monitored by the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO).
Der er generel enighed om, at en streng gennemfżrelse af ovennžvnte regler ville give en meget hżj sikkerhed mod BSE. 
There is general agreement that the rigorous implementation of the above measures would provide a very high level of protection against BSE.
Men efter den seneste BSE-krise er lovgrundlaget blevet ajourfżrt og taget op til revision. 
However, arising from the most recent BSE crisis, the legislative framework has been updated and reviewed.
Det har vžret tanken bde at imżdeg svaghederne i medlemsstaternes gennemfżrelse af reglerne og tage hżjde for ny videnskabelig viden. 
This has aimed both at addressing weaknesses identified in the implementation of measures in the Member States and at taking account of new scientific evidence.
Udvidelse af en ržkke af ovennžvnte tiltag til ogs at omfatte importvarer fra tredjelande Der fżres nżje tilsyn med ovenstende tiltag, navnlig p baggrund af ny videnskabelig viden. 
VII.the extension of a range of the above measures to imports from third countries. The above measures are kept under regular review, especially in relation to new scientific evidence.
Der mangler dog to stżrre EU-retsakter, som begge falder ind under den fžlles beslutningsprocedure for Rdet og Europa-Parlamentet, inden lovgrundlaget er fuldstžndigt. 
However, two major pieces of legislation, both governed by co-decision in the Council and in the European Parliament, are necessary to complete the legislative framework.
For det fżrste forordning (EF) nr. 999/2001 om transmisible spongiforme encephalopatier (TSEŐer), hvori man samler en lang ržkke eksisterende tiltag vedrżrende overvgning, undersżgelse, risikoklassificering af medlemsstaterne, specificeret risikomateriale osv. 
First, Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 on transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) which brings together a wide range of existing measures on surveillance, testing, risk classification of countries, specified risk materials (SRMs), etc.
Denne forordning trdte i kraft den 1. juli 2001, men slr fżrst fuldt igennem, nr der er truffet beslutninger om risikoklassificering af medlemsstaterne. 
This Regulation entered into force on 1 July 2001 but its full impact will only be evident when decisions have been taken on the risk classification of countries.
For det andet forordningsfor-slaget om animalske biprodukter, som fastlžgger principper for sikker indsamling og forarbejdning af sdanne produkter. 
Second, the proposed regulation on animal by-products which provides a framework for the safe collection and processing of such products.
Der er truffet en ržkke initiativer for at sikre, at dette lovgrundlag gennemfżres konsekvent. 
A range of initiatives has been taken to ensure that this framework is implemented in a coherent manner.
BSE drżftes nu som et formelt punkt p dagsordenen p samtlige mżder i Rdet (landbrug), hvor medlemsstaterne fżres ajour med udviklingen og giver udtryk for deres egne holdninger og prioriteter. 
BSE is now formally discussed at all meetings of the Agriculture Council when Member States are updated on developments and voice their own concerns and priorities.
Europa-Parlamentet holdes ogs ajour, bde nr kommissžr David Byrne deltager i mżder i de pgžldende udvalg, og nr man drżfter de mere omfattende C 324/32 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 20.11.2001 lovtiltag, som falder ind under den fžlles beslutningsprocedure. 
The European Parliament has also been kept fully informed both through regular appearances by Commissioner Byrne before the relevant committees and in the C 324/32 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20.11.2001 discussions on the major legislative measures governed by co-decision.
Endelig har Kommissionen truffet de nżdvendige skridt for at sikre, at processen er gennemskuelig, navnlig ved at offentliggżre Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontorets rapporter og Den Videnskabelige Styringskomits udtalelser. 
Finally, the Commission has taken the necessary measures to ensure that the process is carried out in a fully transparent manner, especially through the publication of the reports of the Food and Veterinary Office and the opinions of the Scientific Steering Committee.
Retten henleder opmžrksomheden p forsinkelsen i indfżrelsen af visse regler, isžr forslaget om at fjerne og destruere visse typer specificeret risikomateriale og forslaget om et forbud mod anvendelse af visse dyreproteiner i foder til husdyr. 
The Court draws attention to the delay in the introduction of certain measures, notably the proposal to remove and destroy certain specified risk materials (SRMs) and the proposal to ban the feeding of certain animal proteins to farmed animals.
Kommissionen vil gerne understrege de sžrlige forhold, som omgiver begge disse beslutninger. 
The Commission would like to highlight the particular circumstances underlying both of these decisions.
Specificeret risikomateriale Kommissionen foreslog oprindeligt EU-lovgivning om fjernelse og destruktion af SRM i december 1996. 
SRMs The Commission originally proposed a Community measure for the removal and destruction of SRMs in December 1996.
Forslaget tog imidlertid flere r om at komme igennem i Rdet. 
However, it remained blocked for several years in the Council.
Her hang det fast, mens Kommissionen gentagne gange forsżgte at sikre den nżdvendige opbakning til konsekvente regler, men ikke havde held til at skaffe et kvalificeret flertal for forslaget i Den Stende Veterinžrkomit, og Rdet forkastede derfor forslagene med simpelt flertal. 
This blockage existed as the repeated attempts by the Commission to secure the necessary support for a coherent measure did not secure a qualified majority in support of the proposal in the Standing Veterinary Committee and the Council subsequently rejected the proposals by a simple majority against.
Situationen žndrede sig i juni 2000, hvor der endelig ikke lžngere var et simpelt flertal imod, og Kommissionen vedtog herefter selv forslaget uden stżtte fra Rdet. 
This situation changed in June 2000 when, finally, there was no longer a simple majority against and the Commission adopted the proposal on its own authority but without the support of the Council.
Det trdte i kraft den 1. oktober 2000. 
It entered into force on 1 October 2000.
Denne forsinkelse er naturligvis dybt beklagelig, men den afspejler forholdene i EUŐs (davžrende) beslutningsproces. 
This delay is of course deeply regrettable but reflects the reality of the (then) decision-making process in the Community.
Retten rejser det spżrgsml, om Kommissionen burde have yderligere befżjelse til at tržffe hastetiltag i sdanne situationer. 
The Court raises the question of whether the Commission should have specific additional emergency powers in such situations.
Det er naturligvis et żmfindtligt punkt, eftersom medlemsstaterne er betžnkelige ved at afgive sdanne befżjelser vedrżrende meget fżlsomme omrder, uden at et forskriftsudvalg fungerer som sikkerhedsnet. 
This is of course a very delicate issue as Member States are reluctant to cede such powers on very sensitive issues without the safeguard of clearance through a regulatory committee.
Det bliver bedre, nr de nye udvalgsprocedurer bliver indfżrt med Rdets afgżrelse 1999/468 om de gennemfżrelses-befżjelser, der tillžgges Kommissionen. 
The situation will improve with the introduction of the new comitology provisions in Council Decision 1999/468/EC on implementing powers conferred on the Commission.
I denne afgżrelse afskaffes Rdets mulighed for at forkaste et kommissionsforslag med simpelt flertal. 
Indeed, that Decision abrogates the possibility for the Council to reject a Commission proposal by simple majority.
Efter denne afgżrelse kan et forslag, som ikke er i overensstemmelse med udvalgets udtalelse, eller som udvalget ikke har afgivet udtalelse om, kun forkastes med kvalificeret flertal i Rdet. 
With this Decision, a proposal which is not in accordance with the opinion of the committee or for which no opinion is delivered by that committee, can only be rejected by a qualified majority in the Council.
En ržkke sektorspecifikke retsakter, f.eks. forordning (EF) nr. 999/2001 om TSEŐer, styrker ogs Kommissionens befżjelser i nżdsituationer. 
A number of sectoral pieces of legislation, including Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 on TSEs, also increase the powers of the Commission in relation to emergency decisions.
Det kan generelt siges at vžre et spżrgsml, der skal analyseres som led i en senere gennemgang af ansvarsfordelingen mellem EU-og medlemsstatsplan. 
More generally, it is an issue which needs to be looked at in the context of any further review of the relative responsibilities at Community and Member State level.
I mellemtiden er der fra politisk side forżget opmžrksomhed om, at man ikke bżr Čskyde genvejÇ, nr det gžlder beskyttelse af den offentlige sundhed. 
In the interim, there is a heightened political awareness of the need to take no short cuts in relation to public health protection.
Kżd-og benmel Det er fuldt anerkendt, at inficeret kżd-og benmel er den vigtigste kilde til overfżrsel af BSE. 
Meat and bonemeal (MBM) There is full acceptance that contaminated meat and bonemeal is the major vector for the transmission of BSE.
Hvis forbuddet overholdes fuldt ud, undgs faren, hvilket stżttes af den videnskabelige dokumentation p omrdet. 
If this ban is rigorously implemented the threat is addressed, as is supported by the scientific evidence on the matter.
Men det str nu klart, at medlemsstaterne ikke gennemfżrte forbuddet fyldestgżrende. 
However, it is now clear that this ban was not implemented in an entirely satisfactory manner by Member States.
Kommissionen traf en ržkke foranstaltninger for at styrke overholdelsen, bl.a. ved at indfżre hżjere forarbejdningsstandarder for kżd-og benmel og ved at ivžrksžtte overtrždelsesprocedurer. 
The Commission took a number of measures in an effort to improve compliance, including the introduction of higher processing standards for meat and bone meal and the initiation of infringement proceedings.
Da der blev sat spżrgsmlstegn ved, hvor effektiv kontrollen var, eftersom der optrdte tilfžlde af BSE hos dyr, der var fżdt, efter at forbuddet var indfżrt, traf Kommissionen mere hndfaste tiltag. 
In addition, as doubts increased over the effectiveness of controls, as evidenced by the emergence of cases of BSE in animals born after the introduction of the ban, the Commission took stronger action.
Kommissionen kržvede f.eks. garanti fra hżjeste sted for, at de eksisterende tiltag vedrżrende kżd-og benmel blev gennemfżrt kompromislżst. 
Thus, for example, the Commission requested assurances at the highest level that the existing control measures on meat and bonemeal were being rigorously implemented.
Da tilbagemeldingerne i denne forbindelse ikke var tilfredsstillende, foreslog Kommissionen et totalforbud mod fodring af husdyr af nogen art med en lang ržkke forskellige dyre-proteiner. 
When the replies to these requests were found to be unsatisfactory, the Commission proposed a total ban on the feeding of a very wide range of animal proteins to all farmed animals.
Rdet stżttede dog ikke dette forslag og vedtog i stedet et langt mindre vidtgende forbud p landbrugsministerrdets mżde den 4. december 2000. 
In the event, the Council did not support this proposal and instead adopted a less extensive ban at the meeting of the Agriculture Council on 4 December 2000.
Forud for denne afgżrelse havde ingen af medlemsstaterne indfżrt nationale forbud mod kżd-og benmel i dette omfang. 
No national measures to ban meat and bonemeal on such an extensive scale were in place in the Member States prior to this decision.
Det Forenede Kongerige og Portugal havde ganske vist forbudt anvendelse af kżd-og benmel fra pattedyr i foder til husdyr, men det skyldtes de mange tilfžlde af BSE i disse lande. 
While the United Kingdom (UK) and Portugal did ban the feeding of mammalian MBM to all farm animals, this was a reflection of the high incidence of BSE in these countries.
Det bżr ppeges, at der ikke blev presset p for at f et tilsvarende eller mere omfattende forbud i nogen anden medlemsstat. 
It is notable that there was no pressure for a similar or more extensive ban in any other Member State.
Den Videnskabelige Styringskomit havde heller ikke afgivet nogen udtalelse om, at der burde indfżres et totalforbud. 
Moreover, there was no Scientific Steering Committee opinion to suggest that a total ban was necessary.
I rapporten om den internationale videnskabelige konference om kżd-og benmel i 1997 anbefalede man ikke et forbud, men opfordrede i stedet til yderligere overvejelser vedrżrende en politik p omrdet. 
The report on the international scientific conference on MBM in 1997 called for further reflection on policy in this area rather than calling for a ban.
Kommissionen reagerede p denne rapport ved at intensivere den videnskabelige analyse af de berżrte forhold og derefter tržffe de fornżdne lov-givningstiltag. 
The Commission acted on this report through increased scientific review of the issues involved, followed by the appropriate legislative action.
DECHARGEMYNDIGHEDENS ANBEFALINGER 3. 
DISCHARGE AUTHORITYŐS RECOMMENDATIONS 3.
Rettens beretning sžtter flere gange fokus p, at den indberettede forekomst af BSE i medlemsstaterne efter al sandsynlighed var for lav, og at der kunne sžttes spżrgsmlstegn ved visse medlemsstaters status som ČBSE-frieÇ. 
The CourtŐs report highlights on a number of occasions that the incidence of BSE in Member States was likely to be under-reported and that the ÔBSE-freeŐ status of some Member States was questionable.
Det bżr understreges, at Kommissionen i sine politiske beslutninger altid har handlet ud fra en formodning om, at dette var tilfžldet. 
It is important to highlight that the Commission in its policy decisions always acted on the basis that both of these assumptions were correct.
20.11.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 324/33 risikomateriale an, idet den holdt fast p, at der burde vžre harmoniserede EU-regler for fjernelse og destruktion af risikomateriale i alle medlemsstater med BSE. 
This is evidenced in the approach 20.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 324/33 towards SRMs where the Commission insisted on a harmonised EU measure requiring their removal and destruction in all Member States with BSE.
For at kunne fastsl det sande omfang af BSE og dens geografiske spredning foreslog Kommissionen en mere effektiv overvgning, herunder anvendelse af hur-tigtest. 
In order to establish accurately the true incidence of BSE and its geographical spread, the Commission proposed strengthened surveillance measures, including the use of rapid tests.
Kommissionen anmodede ogs Den Videnskabelige Styringskomit om at foretage en vurdering af den geografiske risiko for BSE og fremskaffede i den forbindelse omfattende baggrunds-oplysninger. 
The Commission also asked the SSC for its assessment on the geographical risk of BSE and provided extensive background information in this respect.
Den Videnskabelige Styringskomits udtalelse, som Kommissionen stżttede fuldt ud, konkluderede, at BSE sandsynligvis fandtes i en ržkke medlemsstater, som betragtede sig som BSE-frie. 
The opinions of the SSC, which the Commission fully supported, concluded that BSE was likely to exist in a number of Member States which considered themselves to be BSE-free.
Det kan ikke komme bag p nogen, at der blev konstateret en hżjere forekomst af BSE via systematiske undersżgelser. 
The confirmation of a higher incidence of BSE when using systematic testing should not come as a surprise.
Da der ikke fandtes hurtigtest Ń som fżrst kom til i slutningen af 1999 Ń var der uden tvivl et vist antal BSE-tilfžlde i de sene stadier af klinisk infektivitet, som ikke blev opdaget. 
In the absence of reliable rapid tests, which only became available in late 1999, it is inevitable that a certain number of BSE cases, in the late stages of clinical infectiveness, escape detection.
Men forekomsten af BSE bżr ogs ses i det rette perspektiv. 
The incidence of BSE should also be looked at in perspective.
P trods af de grundigere overvgningstiltag, der er blevet indfżrt, bl.a. undersżgelse af alt kvžg over 30 mneder, er der ikke nžr s mange tilfžlde i resten af EU som i Det Forenede Kongerige. 
Notwithstanding the increased surveillance measures in place, including the testing of all bovines aged over 30 months, the number of cases falls dramatically short of the incidence in the UK.
Da epidemien var p sit hżjeste i Det Forenede Kongerige i 1992, var der omkring 37 000 tilfžlde blandt mindre end 11 mio. kreaturer. 
At the peak of the epidemic in the UK, in 1992, the annual incidence was of the order of 37 000 in a herd population of less than 11 million.
Heroverfor er forekomsten andre steder i EU i 2000 anslet til under 1 000 tilfžlde blandt over 70 mio. kreaturer. 
This compares to the expected incidence of less than 1 000 elsewhere in the EU in 2000 in a herd population of over 70 million.
Efter Kommissionens opfattelse skyldes faldet i forbrugertilliden under den seneste krise en kombination af flere faktorer, heraf dog isžr at der for fżrste gang blev konstateret BSE i visse medlemsstater, og at antallet af BSE-tilfžlde i andre var hżjere end forventet. 
The Commission view is that the fall in consumer confidence in the course of the most recent crisis is attributable to a combination of factors but especially the discovery of BSE for the first time in a number of Member States and the higher than expected incidence in a number of others.
Det var i modstrid med offentlighedens forventninger i de pgžldende lande, eftersom forbrugerne havde fet at vide, at BSE ikke var noget problem der. 
These discoveries were contrary to public expectations in the countries concerned where consumers had been led to believe that BSE was not a national problem.
Men efterhnden som man kunne konstatere, at der blev truffet de fornżdne foranstaltninger for at beskytte forbrugerne mod BSE-risikoen, vendte tilliden tilbage. 
However, as evidence emerged that the necessary measures were being taken to protect against the risk of BSE, confidence gradually returned.
Der har sledes vžret en omfattende lovgivning til bekžmpelse af BSE i revis. 
There has been a comprehensive body of legislation in place to combat BSE for several years.
De videnskabelige data viser, at denne lovgivning, hvis den bliver overholdt nżje, er tilstržkkelig til at forhindre risikoen for overfżrsel af BSE. 
The scientific evidence strongly supports the view that this legislation, if rigorously implemented, is sufficient to protect against the risks of transmission of BSE.
Kommissionen har gentagne gange mindet medlemsstaterne om deres forpligtelser i denne forbindelse og har lagt stor vžgt p at gennemfżre kontrolbesżg for at fżre tilsyn med medlemsstaternes egne kontrolforanstaltninger. 
The Commission has repeatedly reminded Member States of their obligations in this respect and has given a high priority to inspections in the Member States of the implementation of control measures.
Kontrolbesżgene har bekržftet, at gennemfżrelsen ofte lod meget tilbage at żnske. 
These inspections have confirmed that the degree of implementation often left much to be desired.
Kontrolrapporterne offentliggżres p internettet og drżftes med medlemsstaterne for at tilskynde til, at reglerne overholdes bedre. 
The reports of these inspections are published on the Internet and discussed with the Member States with a view to encouraging better compliance.
Kommissionen ivžrksatte desuden overtrždelsesprocedurer mod de fleste af medlemsstaterne i perioden 1997-1999. 
Moreover, the Commission initiated legal infringements against most of the Member States in the period 1997 to 1999.
Retten har fremhžvet de store forsinkelser i behandlingen af overtrždelsesprocedurerne som en hindring for Kommissionens sikring af en bedre overholdelse af reglerne; dette problem erkender Kommissionen, men der er ikke mange andre mder at gżre det p. 
The lengthy delay in processing infringement proceedings has been highlighted by the Court as an obstacle to the CommissionŐs ability to ensure better implementation. The Commission acknowledges this failing, but there are few alternatives.
Medlemsstaterne forlanger en bred og langvarig proces, hvor der tages fuldt hensyn til deres synspunkter vedrżrende eventuelle overtrždelser, og Kommissionens bevisbyrde er meget tung. 
Member States insist on a full and lengthy process to allow their point of view to be taken fully into account in any potential legal infringements and there is also a very high burden of proof on the Commission.
Kommissionen har desuden kun begržnsede midler til kontrolbesżg, hvilket Retten da ogs erkender. 
In addition, the resources available to the Commission for inspections are also limited, as is acknowledged by the Court.
Endelig er det ikke fuldt afklaret, hvilke muligheder der er for at bruge sammenkždningsprincip-pet, dvs. at anvende sanktioner p andre omrder i tilfžlde af drlig kontrol med foranstaltninger p dyresundhedsomrdet. 
Finally, the scope for cross-compliance whereby penalties could be applied in other areas due to poor controls on veterinary measures is not evident.
Kommissionen overvejer aktivt, hvad man ellers kan gżre for at styrke overholdelsen, og sžtter i denne forbindelse stor pris p Rettens beretning. 
The Commission is actively reflecting on what more could be done to improve compliance and the CourtŐs report is very welcome in this respect.
Rettens overvejelser om omlžgning af stżtte og tilskyndelse til ekstensivering er i hżjeste grad i overensstemmelse med Kommissionens beslutningsforslag, som landbrugsministerrdet vedtog den 20. juni 2001. 
The reflections of the Court on reorienting subsidies and encouraging extensification constitute the major part of the decision proposed by the Commission and adopted by the Agriculture Council of 20 June 2001.