natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Disse myndigheders opgaver er defineret i sektorspecifikke forordninger: a) Forvaltningsmyndighederne (hvis opgaver kan uddelegeres til bemyndigede organer) varetager den daglige forvaltning af de projekter, der medfinansieres under de forskellige operationelle programmer (OP'er) b) Attesteringsmyndighederne samler projektstżttemodtagernes omkostningsanmeldelser i udgiftsoversigter og anmelder dem til Kommissionen med henblik p godtgżrelse c) Revisionsmyndighederne foretager en rlig uafhžngig revision af de omkostninger, der er anmeldt til Kommissionen, og af, hvordan forvaltnings-og kontrolsystemet fungerer. 
The tasks of these authorities are defined in sectoral regulations: (a) managing authorities (whose tasks can be delegated to intermediate bodies) carry out the day‐to‐day management of projects co‐financed under the respective operational programme (OP), (b) certifying authorities aggregate cost declarations prepared by project beneficiaries into statements of expenditure and declare them to the Commission for reimbursement, and (c) audit authorities perform a yearly independent audit of the costs declared to the Commission and of the functioning of the management and control system.
Myndighederne skal navnlig udvžlge projekter samt fordele og kontrollere midlerne. 
In particular, these authorities select projects, distribute and control funds.
Medlemsstaterne er ogs ansvarlige for ved forebyggelse, opdagelse og korrektion af uregelmžssigheder at sikre, at de udgifter, der skal godtgżres over EU-budgettet, er uden uregelmžssigheder2. 
Member States are also responsible for ensuring that the expenditure subject to reimbursement from the EU budget is free from irregularities through the prevention, detection and correction of irregularities2.
Samtidig kan Kommissionen tržffe foranstaltninger til at inddrive midler, der er udbetalt uretmžssigt. 
At the same time the Commission may take actions to recover funds that have been unduly paid.
Disse anmodninger bliver samlet og sendes via attesteringsmyndigheden til Kommissionen. 
These are then aggregated and sent through the certifying authority to the Commission.
2 Artikel 38 og 39 i Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 1260/1999 af 21. juni 1999 om vedtagelse af generelle bestemmelser for strukturfondene (EFT L 161 af 26.6.1999, s. 
The Commission then pays the amount equalling the 2 Articles 38 and 39 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p.
1), artikel 70 og 98 i Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 1083/2006 af 11. juli 2006 om generelle bestemmelser for Den Europžiske Fond for Regionaludvikling, Den Europžiske Socialfond og Samhżrighedsfonden og ophžvelse af forordning (EF) nr. 
1), Articles 70 and 98 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
1303/2013 af 17. december 2013 om fžlles bestemmelser for Den Europžiske Fond for Regionaludvikling, Den Europžiske Socialfond, Samhżrighedsfonden, Den Europžiske Landbrugsfond for Udvikling af Landdistrikterne og Den Europžiske Hav-og Fiskerifond og om generelle bestemmelser for Den Europžiske Fond for Regionaludvikling, Den Europžiske Socialfond, Samhżrighedsfonden og Den Europžiske Hav-og Fiskerifond og om ophžvelse af Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 1083/2006 (EUT L 347 af 20.12.2013, s. 
25), Articles 122 and 143 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p.
320), artikel 53b i Rdets forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 1605/2002 af 25. juni 2002 om finansforordningen vedrżrende De Europžiske Fžllesskabers almindelige budget (EFT L 248 af 16.9.2002, s. 
320), Article 53b of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p.
1) og artikel 59 i forordning (EU, Euratom) nr. 966/2012. 
1) and Article 59 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012. 14
Derefter betaler Kommissionen et belżb lig med den medfinansierede del af de anmeldte udgifter til medlemsstatens budget, hvorfra midlerne overfżres til de respektive stżttemodtagere (jf. figur 1). 
15 co-financed part of the declared expenditure into the Member State’s budget, from where the funds are transferred to respective beneficiaries (see Figure 1).
Kommissionen godkender de operationelle programmer efter forhandlinger med medlemsstaterne, giver medlemsstaternes myndigheder vejledning og instrukser om udfżrelsen af deres opgaver og foretager kontrol i medlemsstaterne eller skrivebordskontrol af politikkens gennemfżrelse. 
The Commission negotiates and approves operational programmes with Member States, provides guidance and instructions to Member State authorities on carrying out their tasks and performs Member State level or desk checks to control the implementation of the policy.
Figur 1 - Forvaltning og finansielle strżmme i samhżrighedspolitikken Kilde: Den Europžiske Revisionsret. 
Figure 1 – Management and financial flow of cohesion policy Source: European Court of Auditors.
I alt var der 618 OP'er og 1 119 samhżrighedsfondsprojekter i programperioden 2000-20063, 440 OP'er i perioden 2007-2013 og 391 OP'er (under EFRU, Samhżrighedsfonden, ESF eller flere fonde) i perioden 2014-2020. 
Overall, there were 618 OPs and 1119 CF projects for the 2000-2006 programme period3, 440 OPs for the 2007-2013 period and 391 OPs (ERDF, CF, ESF or multi-fund) for the 2014-2020 period.
3 16 I programperioden 2000-2006 blev Samhżrighedsfonden gennemfżrt ved hjžlp af projekter godkendt direkte af Kommissionen, men i programperioden 2007-2013 blev projekterne integreret i OP'er. 
3 While in the 2000-2006 programme period CF was implemented through projects directly approved by the Commission, in the 2007-2013 programme period they were integrated into OPs.
Kommissionens foranstaltninger til at beskytte EU-budgettet p samhżrighedsomrdet 10. 
The Commission’s measures to protect the EU budget in Cohesion 10.
Kommissionens foranstaltninger til at beskytte EU-budgettet skal sikre, at kun retmžssige udgifter (dvs. udgifter afholdt i overensstemmelse med den gžldende EU-lovgivning og nationale/regionale lovgivning) medfinansieres over EU-budgettet. 
The Commission’s measures to protect the EU budget aim to ensure that only regular spending (i.e. expenditure which is spent in accordance with the applicable EU and national/regional legislation) is co‐financed from the EU budget.
Det er i fżrste ržkke medlemsstaternes ansvar at opdage, korrigere og forebygge fejl4. 
It is the Member States’ responsibility to detect, correct and prevent errors in the first instance4.
Hvis Kommissionen erfarer, at regelstridige udgifter er blevet eller sandsynligvis vil blive medfinansieret, kan den gribe ind og korrigere allerede medfinansierede udgifter eller forebygge fremtidig medfinansiering af regelstridige udgifter i fremtidige udgiftsoversigter. 
If the Commission finds out that irregular expenditure was co‐financed or likely to be co‐financed, the Commission can intervene and correct already co‐financed expenditure or can prevent the future co‐financing of irregular expenditure in future statements of expenditure.
Forordningerne for perioderne 2000-20065, 2007-20136 og 2014-20207 giver Kommissionen mulighed for at tržffe forebyggende foranstaltninger, dvs. afbryde og suspendere betalinger, og at foretage finansielle korrektioner. 
The regulations for the 2000‐20065, as well as those for the 2007‐20136 and 2014‐20207 periods, enable the Commission to apply preventive measures, i.e. payment interruptions and suspensions, and financial corrections.
I perioden 2000-2006 gav forordningerne ikke Kommissionen mulighed for at bruge afbrydelser som forebyggende foranstaltninger. 
For the 2000‐2006 period, the regulations did not provide for interruptions as part of the Commission’s preventive measures.
Generaldirektoratet for Regionalpolitik og Bypolitik og Generaldirektoratet for Beskžftigelse, Sociale Anliggender, Arbejdsmarkedsforhold og Inklusion er ansvarlige for anvendelsen af disse korrigerende foranstaltninger i samhżrighedspolitikken. 
The Directorates‐General for Regional and Urban Policy and for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion are responsible for the application of these corrective measures in cohesion policy.
Kommissionen kan tržffe forebyggende foranstaltninger og/eller foretage finansielle korrektioner p grundlag af uregelmžssigheder eller alvorlige mangler konstateret af medlemsstaternes myndigheder (f.eks. forvaltningsmyndigheden eller revisionsmyndigheden) eller p grundlag af sine egne kontroller og revisioner. 
The Commission can apply preventive measures and/or financial corrections on the basis of irregularities or serious deficiencies identified by Member State authorities (e.g. the managing or audit authority) or on the basis of its own verifications and audits.
Dette omfatter ogs OLAF-undersżgelser. 
This also includes OLAF investigations.
Revisioner foretaget af Den Europžiske Revisionsret kan ogs danne grundlag for sdanne foranstaltninger (jf. bilag I). 4 5 6 7 17 Artikel 30 i forordning (EF) nr. 1260/1999, artikel 70 og 98 i forordning (EF) nr. 
They can also be the result of audits by the European Court of Auditors (see Annex I). 4 5 6 7 16 Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, Articles 70 and 98 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 and Article 143 of Regulation (EU) 1303/2013.
Artikel 39 i forordning (EF) nr. 
Article 39 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999.
1260/1999. artikel 91, 92 og 99-102 i forordning (EF) nr. 
Articles 91, 92 and 99 to 102 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.
Artikel 83, 85, 142 og 144-147 i forordning (EU) nr. 1303/2013. 
Articles 83, 85, 142 and 144 to 147 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013.
Forebyggende foranstaltninger: Afbrydelse og suspension af betalinger 14. 
Preventive measures: payment interruptions and suspensions 14.
Forebyggende foranstaltninger indebžrer, at betalinger fra EU-budgettet udsžttes. 
Preventive measures result in a deferral of payments from the EU budget.
Dette lžgger yderligere pres p medlemsstaten for at tržffe de nżdvendige korrigerende foranstaltninger. 
This puts additional pressure on the Member State to take the necessary corrective action.
De vigtigste typer forebyggende foranstaltninger er afbrydelse og suspension (jf. tekstboks 1). 
The main types of preventive measures are interruptions and suspensions (see Box 1).
Muligheden for at afbryde betalinger blev indfżrt i forordningen for perioden 2007-2013 (jf. bilag II). 
Payment interruptions were introduced in the 2007‐2013 regulation (see Annex II).
Den vžsentligste fordel ved afbrydelser er, at de kan foretages straks uden en lang administrativ procedure, hvis Kommissionen har begrundet mistanke om vžsentlige 8 9 10 11 18 Tekstboks 1 - Afbrydelse og suspension af betalinger fra EU-budgettet I princippet skal Kommissionen betale medlemsstaten senest to mneder efter at have modtaget betalingsanmodningen. 
The main advantage of interruptions is that they can be applied immediately without a long administrative procedure if the Commission has evidence suggesting significant 8 9 10 11 17 Box 1 – Interruptions and suspensions of payments from the EU budget In principle, the Commission must make the payment to the Member State within two months of having received the payment claim.
Kommissionen kan imidlertid afbryde8 betalingsfristen i hżjst seks mneder, hvis der er begrundet mistanke om, at der er alvorlige mangler i medlemsstatens forvaltnings-og kontrolsystem9, eller hvis den skal foretage supplerende kontrol efter at have modtaget oplysninger om, at ukorrigerede regelstridige udgifter er attesteret i en udgiftsoversigt. 
The Commission may however interrupt8 the payment deadline for a maximum of six months if there is evidence to suggest a significant deficiency in the functioning of the management and control system of the Member State9; or if the Commission has to carry out additional verifications following the receipt of information that uncorrected irregular expenditure has been certified in a statement of expenditure.
Kommissionen kan suspendere10 en mellemliggende betaling eller en del af den, hvis der er begrundet mistanke om, at der er en vžsentlig mangel ved forvaltnings-og kontrolsystemet, og medlemsstaten ikke har truffet korrigerende foranstaltninger p dette punkt, hvis ukorrigerede regelstridige udgifter behžftet med en vžsentlig uregelmžssighed er anmeldt i en attesteret udgiftsoversigt, eller hvis medlemsstaten groft har tilsidesat sine forvaltnings-og kontrolforpligtelser. 
The Commission may suspend10 an interim payment or a part of it, if there is evidence of a serious deficiency in the management and control system, which was not corrected by the Member State; or in case irregular uncorrected expenditure linked to a serious irregularity has been declared in a certified statement of expenditure; or in case there has been a serious breach by a Member State of its management and control obligations.
Forud for suspensionen foretages der en pržsuspension11, hvor Kommissionen underretter medlemsstaten om de konstaterede mangler. 
The suspension is preceded by a pre‐suspension11, through which the Commission informs the Member State of deficiencies found.
Hensigten med pržsuspensionen er at give medlemsstaten mulighed for at afhjžlpe manglerne og ret til at blive hżrt, fżr der tržffes afgżrelse om en suspension. 
The aim of the pre‐suspension is to give the Member State the possibility to address the deficiencies and the right to be heard before a suspension is decided upon.
Artikel 91 i forordning (EF) nr. 1083/2006. 
Article 91 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.
Dette er sžrlig relevant, nr medlemsstatens revisionsmyndighed sender den rlige kontrolrapport med sine revisionsresultater til Kommissionen ved rets udgang. 
This is particularly relevant when the Member State’s audit authority sends its annual control report containing its audit findings to the Commission at year end.
Artikel 92 i forordning (EF) nr. 1083/2006. 
Article 92 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.
19 svagheder12. En suspension kan derimod fżrst foretages, nr der er konstateret en alvorlig mangel, hvilket kržver en lžngere forudgende procedure (jf. tekstboks 1). 
deficiencies12. To apply a suspension, however, a serious deficiency needs to be established resulting in prior longer procedure (see Box 1).
Hvis der ikke er nogen betalingsanmodning under behandling (og dermed ingen betalingsfrist, der kan afbrydes), kan Kommissionen sende en advarsel. 
If there is no payment claim pending (i.e. there is no payment deadline to be interrupted), the Commission may also issue a warning.
Kommissionen advarer medlemsstaten om, at hvis den har indgivet en betalingsanmodning, vil betalingsfristen blive afbrudt. 
The Commission warns the Member State that if a payment application has been submitted, its payment deadline will be interrupted.
Denne procedure er imidlertid ikke fastsat i forordningerne. 
This procedure is, however, not set out in the regulations.
Suspensioner foretages ved en juridisk bindende kommissionsafgżrelse rettet til den pgžldende medlemsstat. 
Suspensions are applied by a legally binding Commission decision addressed to the Member State concerned.
Alle andre forebyggende foranstaltninger (advarsler, afbrydelser, pržsuspensioner) har form af et brev underskrevet af Kommissionens generaldirektżr (som ved delegation bemyndiget anvisningsberettiget) og rettet til medlemsstatens myndigheder. 
All other preventive measures (warning, interruption, pre‐ suspension) take the form of a letter signed by a director‐general of the Commission (acting in its capacity as Authorising Officer by Delegation) and addressed to Member State authorities.
Kommissionens finansielle korrektioner 18. 
Financial corrections by the Commission 18.
Kommissionen kan foretage finansielle korrektioner, hvis alvorlige mangler i medlemsstatens forvaltnings-og kontrolsystemer har fżrt til systembetingede fejl, eller hvis Kommissionen har konstateret en individuel uregelmžssighed (jf. bilag I)13. 
Where serious deficiencies in the Member State management and control systems have led to systemic errors or the Commission has identified an individual irregularity, the Commission can also apply financial corrections (see Annex I)13.
Formlet med finansielle korrektioner er at genskabe en situation, hvor alle de udgifter, der er anmeldt til medfinansiering fra EFRU, Samhżrighedsfonden eller ESF og godtgjort af Kommissionen, er i overensstemmelse med de gžldende regler14. 
The purpose of financial corrections is to restore a situation where all of the expenditure declared for co‐financing from the ERDF, CF or ESF and reimbursed by the Commission is in line with the applicable rules14.
I programperioderne 2000-2006 og 2007-2013 kunne medlemsstaterne erstatte regelstridige udgifter med nye udgifter, hvis de traf de nżdvendige korrigerende foranstaltninger og anvendte den tilhżrende finansielle korrektion (bekržftet finansiel korrektion)15. 
During the 2000‐2006 and 2007‐2013 programme periods, Member States were able to replace irregular expenditure with new expenditure if they took the necessary corrective actions and applied the related financial correction (confirmed financial correction)15.
Om det skete i 12 13 14 15 Artikel 91 i forordning (EF) nr. 1083/2006. 
This 12 13 14 15 18 Article 91 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.
Artikel 99-102 i forordning (EF) nr. 1083/2006. Afsnit 1.2 i Kommissionens afgżrelse K(2011) 7321 af 19. oktober 2011 om godkendelse af retningslinjer for de principper, kriterier og vejledende satser, som skal anvendes, nr Kommissionen foretager finansielle korrektioner i henhold til artikel 99 og 100 i Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 
Articles 99 to 102 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. Paragraph 1.2 of C(2011) 7321 Commission decision of 19.10.2011 on the approval of guidelines on the principles, criteria and indicative scales to be applied in respect of financial corrections made by the Commission under Articles 99 and 100 of Council Regulation (EC) N 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006.
praksis afhang imidlertid af, om medlemsstaten kunne anmelde yderligere (retmžssige) udgifter. 
Whether this happened in practice depended, however, on the Member State’s ability to declare additional (regular) expenditure.
Hvis medlemsstaten ikke havde sdanne yderligere udgifter at anmelde, fżrte den finansielle korrektion til en nettokorrektion (tab af midler). 
If the Member State did not have such additional expenditure to declare, the financial correction resulted in a net correction (loss of funding).
Til sammenligning havde en finansiel korrektion foretaget af Kommissionen altid en direkte nettoindvirkning p medlemsstaten: Den skulle betale belżbet tilbage, og dens finansieringsramme blev nedsat (s den havde fžrre penge at bruge i programperioden). 
In contrast, a Commission financial correction decision had always a direct and net impact on the Member State: it had to pay the amount back and its envelope was reduced (i.e. the Member State could spend less money throughout the programme period).
Kommissionen retter ikke finansielle korrektioner direkte mod stżttemodtagerne, men mod de myndigheder i medlemsstaterne, der forvalter OP'erne. 
The Commission does not address financial corrections to beneficiaries directly, but to Member State authorities managing the OPs.
Hvis en finansiel korrektion vedrżrer en bestemt stżttemodtagers projekt, er det den pgžldende medlemsstats myndigheder, der skal sżrge for, at den finansielle korrektion plžgges denne stżttemodtager. 
Should a financial correction relate to individual projects implemented by beneficiaries, it is the Member State authorities who must process the financial correction towards the beneficiary.
Bilag III giver en oversigt over de forskellige scenarier for finansielle korrektioners indvirkning p medlemsstaterne frem til udgangen af programperioden 2007-2013. 
Annex III provides an overview of the different scenarios concerning the impact of the financial corrections on Member States up to the end of the 2007‐2013 programme period.
Fastsžttelse af belżb for finansielle korrektioner 22. 
Determining the amount of financial corrections 22.
Kommissionen kan fastsžtte belżbet for en finansiel korrektion p forskellige mder (jf. tekstboks 2). 
The Commission can determine the amount of a financial correction in different ways (see Box 2).
Tekstboks 2 - Individuelle, faste og ekstrapolerede finansielle korrektioner Kommissionen har fastlagt tre forskellige metoder til fastsžttelse af belżbet for en finansiel korrektion17: a) Stżrrelsenafenfinansielkorrektionfastsžttespgrundlagafindividuellesagerogsvarertildet belżb, der fejlagtigt er blevet debiteret EU-budgettet (individuel korrektion) b) Nr det ikke er muligt eller omkostningseffektivt at foretage en pržcis beregning af det belżb, der fejlagtigt er blevet debiteret EU-budgettet, kan der anvendes en fast korrektion beregnet p grundlag af forud fastsatte kriterier og satser. Faste finansielle korrektioner indvirker p et helt 16 17 20 Artikel 139, stk. 10, i forordning (EU) nr. 
Box 2 ‐ Individual, flat rate and extrapolated financial corrections The Commission has established three different ways to determine the amount of a financial correction17: (a) The amount of a financial correction is assessed based on individual cases and equals the amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the EU budget (individual correction). (b) When it is not possible or not cost‐effective to calculate the amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the EU budget precisely, a flat rate correction may be applied based on pre‐set criteria and scales. Flat rate financial corrections impact a whole operational programme or a part of it 16 17 19 Article 139.10 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013.
Afsnit 1.4-1.6 i K(2011) 7321. 
Paragraphs 1.4 to 1.6 of C(2011) 7321.
21 operationelt program eller en del af det (f.eks. en eller flere prioriteter, projekter relateret til bestemte indkaldelser af forslag, foranstaltninger forvaltet af et bestemt bemyndiget organ) og vedrżrer normalt problemer, som er horisontale (dvs. indvirker p flere projekter eller prioriteter), systematiske (dvs. forekommer flere gange) eller systembetingede (dvs. knytter sig til systemer), eller bestemte ikke-stżtteberettigede udgifter (svagheder i forvaltningsmyndighedens eller det bemyndigede organs kontrol, problemer med hensyn til offentlige udbud) c) Nr uregelmžssigheder forekommer i mange sager, og det ikke er omkostningseffektivt at undersżge dem alle, kan stżrrelsen af en finansiel korrektion fastsžttes ved hjžlp af ekstrapolation. 
20 (e.g. one or several priorities, projects related to specific calls for proposal, measures managed by a specific intermediate body) and usually address horizontal (affecting more projects or priorities), systematic (occurring several times) or systemic (related to systems) problems or specific ineligible expenditure (i.e. weaknesses in checks by the managing authority or intermediate body, problems with public procurement). (c) When irregularities occur in a large number of cases and it is not cost‐effective to examine all cases affected by the irregularity, extrapolation may be used to determine the amount of financial correction.
Det betyder, at korrektionsbelżbet for samtlige berżrte sager beregnes p grundlag af et lille antal undersżgte sager. 
This means that the amount to be corrected for all affected cases is estimated based on a small number of cases examined.