natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Med hensyn til udarbejdelsen af landemiljżanalyser med henblik p de nye landestrategipapirer var der sket fremskridt i 2005, men effekten heraf kan endnu ikke vurderes . . . Der er kun blevet gjort lidt for at integrere miljżet i budgetstżtteprogrammerne . . . . . . 
Progress was made in 2005 in developing country environmental analysis for new Coun-tryStrategyPapersalthoughitsimpactcannotyetbeassessed ....................
Procedurerne for miljżintegrering p projektniveau har ikke vžret systematiske nok EN VURDERING AF MILJŻPROJEKTERNES EFFEKTIVITET OG DE FAKTORER, SOM INDVIR-KERPEFFEKTIVITETEN..................................................... 
Little has been done to mainstream the environment into budgetary support programmes Procedures for environmental mainstreaming at project level have not been sufficiently systematic ............................................................. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENVIRONMENT PROJECTS AND FACTORS INFLUENCINGEFFECTIVENESS ................................................
Vurderingafprojekterneseffektivitet ........................................ 
Introduction ...........................................................
I-VI 1-7 1-3 4-7 8-27 8 9-13 14-27 15-17 18-23 24-27 28-46 28 29-35 36-38 39-46 47-81 47 48-56 Side 3 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 8 8 8 9 10 10 10 11 12 13 13 13 
I-VI 1-7 1-3 4-7 8-27 8 9-13 14-27 15-17 18-23 24-27 28-46 28 29-35 36-38 39-46 47-81 47 48-56 Paragraph Page 3 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 8 8 8 9 10 10 10 11 12 13 13 13
Forsinkelser i forberedelsen og gennemfżrelsen af projekterne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
23 ANNEXIIIŃOverviewofprojecteffectiveness ...............................................
Anbefalinger ........................................................... 
28 TheCommissionŐsreplies ..............................................................
23 BILAGIIIŃOversigtoverprojekterneseffektivitet ............................................ 
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
31 Der bżr opstilles en generel miljżstrategi, og gennemfżrelsen af den bżr fżlges op Mereefffektivmiljżintegrering ......................................... Mereeffektivemiljżprojekter .......................................... 
Recommendations ...................................................... Establishing a comprehensive strategy for the environment and following up its implementation.....................................................
29.9.2006 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 235/3 ALA AVS DDNP DFID Ecofac EuropeAid FAO FMP GD DEV GD ENV GD Relex GEF IQSG KfW LMP LSP MEDA MMA OECD OECD DAC oQSG PNR PRSP SMV UNDP UNEP VVM WSSD WWF UM FORKORTELSER OG TERMINOLOGI Udviklingslande i Asien og Latinamerika De stater i Afrika, Vestindien og Stillehavet, som har underskrevet Cotonou-aftalen Departementet for Dyreliv og Nationalparker British Department for International Development Ecosystmes forestiers dŐAfrique centrale Samarbejdskontoret EuropeAid FNŐs Levnedsmiddel-og Landbrugsorganisation Fattigdoms-og Miljżpartnerskab Generaldirektoratet for Udvikling Generaldirektoratet for Miljż Generaldirektoratet for Eksterne Forbindelser Den Globale Miljżfacilitet Den Tvžrtjenstlige Kvalitetsstżttegruppe Den tyske Kreditanstalt fr Wiederaufbau Landemiljżprofil Landestrategipapir Ledsageforanstaltninger i forbindelse med de żkonomiske og sociale reformer i tredjelande i Middelhavsomrdet Multilaterale Miljżaftaler Organisationen for Żkonomisk Samarbejde og Udvikling OECDŐs Komit for Udviklingsbistand AidcoŐs Kvalitetsstżttegruppe oQSG Programmet for Naturressourcer Strategioplžg til nedbringelse af fattigdom Strategisk Miljżvurdering De Forenede Nationers Udviklingsprogram De Forenede Nationers Miljżprogram Vurdering af virkningerne p miljżet Verdenstopmżdet om bžredygtig udvikling Verdensnaturfonden rtusindudviklingsml 
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/3 ACP ALA CEPs CSP DFID DG DEV DG ENV DG Relex DWNP ECOFAC EIA Europeaid FAO GEF iQSG KfW MDGs MEAs MEDA NRPP OECD OECD DAC OQSG PEP PRSP SEA UNDP UNEP WSSD WWF ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMINOLOGY African, Caribbean and Pacific States signatory to the Cotonou Agreement Asia and Latin America developing countries Country Environment Profile Country Strategy Papers British Department for International Development Directorate-General for Development Directorate-General for Environment Directorate-General for External Relations Department of Wildlife and National Parks Ecosystmes Forestiers dŐAfrique Centrale Environmental Impact Assessment Europeaid Cooperation Office Food and Agriculture Organisation Global Environment Facility Interservice Quality Support Group German Kreditanstalt fr Wiederaufbau Millennium Development Goals Multilateral Environment Agreements Measures to accompany the economic and social reforms in the Mediterranean non-member countries Natural Resources Policy Programme Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Office Quality Support Group (OQSG) Poverty and Environment Partnership Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Strategic Environmental Assessment United Nations Development Programme United Nations Environment Programme World Summit on Sustainable Development World Wildlife Fund
C 235/4 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende RESUM I. Miljżbeskyttelse er et afgżrende led i arbejdet p at fremme en bžredygtig udvikling. 
C 235/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. Protecting the environment is a vital part of promoting sustainable development.
Det er fastsat i traktaten, at miljżbeskyttelseskrav skal integreres i udformningen og gennemfżrelsen af alle Fžllesskabets politikker og aktioner, herunder ogs Fžllesskabets bistand til tredjelande. 
The Treaty requires that environmental protection be integrated into the definition and implementation of all Community policies and activities, including the CommunityŐs external aid.
Mere generelt er miljżet blevet et helt centralt spżrgsml p den internationale udviklingsdagsorden, og miljżmžssig bžredygtighed er et af rtusindudviklingsmlene (jf. punkt 1, 2 og 3). 
More generally, the environment has come to figure as a key item on the international development agenda, and environmental sustainability is one of the Millennium Development Goals (see paragraphs 1 to 3).
I 2005 foretog Den Europžiske Revisionsret derfor en revision af Kommissionens forvaltning af miljżaspektet i forbindelse med dens udviklingsbistand. 
The European Court of Auditors therefore undertook an audit in 2005 of the CommissionŐs management of the environmental aspects of its development aid.
I revisionen indgik en undersżgelse af, om Kommissionen havde en generel strategi for, hvordan den skal behandle miljżaspektet i sit udviklingssamarbejde, om den havde ivžrksat passende forvaltningsordninger for at gennemfżre strategien, i hvor vid udstržkning miljżet var blevet integreret (mainstreamed) i Kommissionens udviklingsprogrammer og -projekter, og hvilke resultater Kommissionens miljżprojekter havde givet. 
The audit examined whether the Commission had a comprehensive strategy for addressing the environmental aspects of its development cooperation, whether it had made adequate management arrangements to implement the strategy, how far the environment had been integrated (mainstreamed) into the CommissionŐs development programmes and projects, and what were the results of the CommissionŐs environment projects.
Revisorerne gennemgik Kommissionens systemer i hovedsždet og i delegationerne, og derudover reviderede de ogs 65 miljżprojekter (samlet vžrdi: 560 millioner euro) og 43 programmer, som ikke vedrżrte miljżet (samlet vžrdi: 1 073 millioner euro), i 16 lande (jf. punkt 4-7). 
As well as reviewing Commission systems in its headquarters and delegations, it also audited 65 environment projects (total value: 560 million euro) and 43 non-environment programmes and projects (total value: 1 073 million euro) in 16 countries (see paragraphs 4 to 7).
Kommissionen bżr opstille en klar og sammenhžngende strategi for behandling af miljżaspektet i forbindelse med dens udviklingsbistand. 
The Commission needs to establish a clear comprehensive strategy for the environmental aspects of its development aid.
Selv om der siden 2001 har vžret en strategi om, at miljżhensyn skal integreres i udviklingssamarbejdet, har man ikke klart lagt sig fast p, hvordan finansieringen af programmer og projekter p miljż-og naturressourceomrdet skal takles. 
While since 2001 there has been a strategy on the need to integrate the environment into development cooperation, the approach to financing programmes and projects in the environment and natural resources sector has not been clearly addressed.
Den nye udviklingspolitik, som blev underskrevet i december 2005, er en god basis for at opstille en generel strategi (jf. punkt 9-12). 
The new development policy signed in December 2005 provides a good basis for establishing a comprehensive strategy (paragraphs 9 to 12).
Kommissionens handlingsplan for gennemfżrelsen af mainstreamingstrategien er ikke blevet fulgt systematisk op og samordnet af de tre mest berżrte generaldirektorater. 
The CommissionŐs action plan for implementing its mainstreaming strategy has not been systematically followed up and co-ordinated by the three Directorates-General primarily concerned.
Som fżlge heraf er de planlagte foranstaltninger generelt blevet gennemfżrt med nogen forsinkelse eller slet ikke (jf. punkt 15, 16 og 17). 
As a result, planned measures have generally been implemented after some delay or not at all (paragraphs 15 to 17).
Kommissionen har ikke udfżrt en fyldestgżrende redegżrelse for de personalemžssige implikationer ved sin mainstreamingstrategi. 
The Commission has not carried out an adequate review of the staffing implications of its mainstreaming strategy.
Kommissionens ansatte har kunnet hente den nżdvendige support hos en miljżhelpdesk bemandet med eksterne eksperter, men fra midten af 2002 og til midten af 2004 fandtes der ikke en sdan helpdesk. 
The Commission has relied on an Environment Helpdesk manned by external experts to provide support to Commission staff, but there was no Helpdesk in place from mid-2002 to mid-2004.
Den hndbog i miljżintegrering, der skulle indfżres i 2003, var stadig ikke fžrdig ved udgangen af 2005, selv om denne hndbog var af stor betydning bde for s vidt angr definitionen af de mainstreamingprocedurer, som Kommissionens ansatte skulle fżlge, og som et vigtigt element i uddannelseskurserne. 
The environment integration manual, to be introduced in 2003, was still not completed at the end of 2005, although this manual was important both for defining mainstreaming procedures to be followed by Commission staff and as a key training input.
Det var ikke obligatorisk for de centralt placerede ansatte at fżlge uddannelseskurserne, selv om det havde vžret meningen, og kursusdeltagelsen var ofte lav (jf. punkt 18-23). 
Training courses have not been compulsory for key officials, although this was foreseen, and have often been poorly attended (see paragraphs 18 to 23).
De systemer, der anvendes til rapportering, overvgning og evaluering af miljżaspektet i Kommissionens udviklingssamarbejde, bżr styrkes yderligere, s det bliver nemmere at vurdere Kommissionens resultater p dette omrde (jf. punkt 24-28). 
There is a need to further strengthen reporting, monitoring and evaluation systems on the environmental aspects of the CommissionŐs development cooperation to enable its performance in this area to be better assessed (see paragraphs 24 to 28).
Siden 2001 har Kommissionen kun gjort beskedne fremskridt med hensyn til at integrere miljżet i sit udviklingssamarbejde. 
The Commission has made only limited progress since 2001 in mainstreaming the environment into its development cooperation.
I de landestrategipapirer (LSP), som Kommissionen udarbejdede sammen med modtagerlandene, og som džkker Kommissionens bistand til modtagerlandene i perioden 2001-2006, var der ikke i tilstržkkelig grad taget hensyn til miljżspżrgsml. 
The Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) drawn up by the Commission in conjunction with beneficiary countries covering the CommissionŐs aid to beneficiary countries over the period 2001 to 2006 did not take sufficient account of environmental issues.
Under forberedelsen af den nye generation af LSP (2007-2013) har Kommissionen langt mere systematisk forsżgt at analysere miljżspżrgsml i modtagerlandene ved at opstille landemiljżprofiler (LMP). Men det er for tidligt at vurdere, i hvor vid udstržkning disse analyser vil f indvirkning p LSP (jf. punkt 29-35). 
In preparing the new generation of CSPs (2007 to 2013), the Commission has been taking a much more systematic approach to analysing environmental issues in beneficiary countries through the establishment of Country Environment Profiles (CEPs) although it is too early to assess how far this analysis will influence the CSPs themselves (paragraphs 29 to 35).
Udviklingsbistanden ydes i stigende grad i form af budgetstżtte, men alligevel har Kommissionen ikke gjort meget for at f integreret miljżhensyn p dette omrde (jf. punkt 36, 37 og 38). 
Despite the increasing importance of budgetary support as a form of development aid, the Commission has done little to mainstream the environment into this area (paragraphs 36 to 38).
Der har ikke vžret nogen konsekvent plan for miljżscreening af nye projekter. 
There has been no consistent system for the environmental screening of new projects.
Kommissionen har ingen fortegnelse over de miljżkonsekvensvurderinger (MKV), der er foretaget af udviklingsprojekter, og Retten fandt dokumentation for, at sdanne vurderinger ikke altid var blevet foretaget, hvor det skulle have vžret tilfžldet. 
The Commission has no inventory of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) performed on development projects and evidence was found that they had not always been carried out where they should have been carried out.
Der bżr ogs indfżres procedurer, som sikrer, at der tages hensyn til anbefalingerne fra MKV (jf. punkt 39-46). 
There is also a need to establish procedures to ensure the implementation of EIA recommendations (see paragraphs 39 to 46).
V. Nžsten alle de undersżgte miljżprojekter var relevante i forhold til modtagerlandets behov, og i mange tilfžlde svarede de ogs til de overordnede bevaringsbehov, navnlig med hensyn til bevaring af biodiversitet og skovbevaring. 
V. Almost all environment projects examined were relevant to beneficiary country needs, and frequently also addressed global conservation needs, particularly in relation to forest and biodiversity conservation.
De opnede projektoutput og resultater har i mange tilfžlde ikke opfyldt mlene. 
Project outputs and results achieved have frequently fallen short of objectives.
Desuden har den valgte tilgang haft iboende problemer med hensyn til at sikre mžrkbar effekt og finansiel levedygtighed (punkt 47-56). 
Moreover, the project approach has inherent difficulties in achieving significant impacts and assuring financial viability (paragraphs 47 to 56).
De vigtigste faktorer, som influerede p projekternes effektivitet, var: et overambitiżst projektdesign, forsinket projektforberedelse og -gennemfżrelse, begržnsede fremskridt med hensyn til opbygning af institutionel kapacitet, problemer med at tilgodese lokalsamfundenes udviklingsbehov, nr man samtidig skulle opfylde bevaringsmlene, projektets utilstržkkelige effekt p de politiske og juridiske rammer og urealistiske ml med hensyn til finansiel bžredygtighed, nr stżtten til projektet ophżrer (jf. punkt 57-81). 29.9.2006 
Key factors influencing project effectiveness have been overambitious project design, delays in project preparation and implementation, limited progress in building institutional capacity, difficulties in addressing the needs of local communities for development while meeting conservation objectives, projectsŐ insufficient impact on the policy and legal framework, and the unrealistic goals set for financial sustainability after the end of project funding (see paragraphs 57 to 81). 29.9.2006
29.9.2006 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 235/5 VI. 
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/5 VI.
Detaljerede anbefalinger med hensyn til opstilling af en generel miljżstrategi og opfżlgning af gennemfżrelsen af den samt til, hvordan man sikrer mere effektiv miljżintegrering og gżr miljżprojekterne mere effektive, fremsžttes i punkt 88-101. 
Detailed recommendations on establishing a comprehensive environmental strategy and following up its implementation as well as how to make both environmental mainstreaming and environment projects more effective are given in paragraphs 88 to 101.
INDLEDNING Baggrund 1. 
INTRODUCTION Background 1.
Siden De Forenede Nationers Stockholm-konference om det menneskelige miljż i 1972 er spżrgsmlet om miljżet og om, hvordan man sikrer en bžredygtig udvikling, blevet et anliggende af international betydning. 
Since the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm the issue of the environment and how to ensure that development is sustainable has become a subject of international concern.
De Forenede Nationers konference om miljż og udvikling i Rio de Janeiro i 1992 profilerede miljż og bžredygtig udvikling yderligere og resulterede i tre Multilaterale Miljżaftaler (MMA): Konventionen om Klimažndring, Konventionen om Biodiversitet og Konventionen om Żrkenbekžmpelse. 
The 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro further raised the profile of the environment and sustainable development, and led to three Multilateral Environment Agreements (MEAs): the Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Convention to Combat Desertification.
Selv om udviklingsdagsordenen i sidste halvdel af halvfemserne i en vis udstržkning igen satte fokus p fattigdomsreduktion, blev miljżmžssig bžredygtighed valgt som et af de otte rtusindud-viklingsml (UM), som blev opstillet p FNŐs rtusindtopmżde i 2000. 
Although in the second half of the 1990s the development agenda refocused to a certain extent on poverty reduction issues, environmental sustainability was chosen as one of the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDG) established at the UN Millennium Summit in 2000.
Verdenstopmżdet om bžredygtig udvikling (World Sum-mit on Sustainable Development, WSSD) i Johannesburg i 2002 sżgte at lżse svel fattigdoms-som miljżproblemer. 
The 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg sought to address both poverty and environment issues.
Grundlžggende har donorsamfundet sżgt at takle miljżaspektet i forbindelse med udviklingssamarbejdet ved hjžlp af fżlgende to typer interventioner: I 2000 blev Det Europžiske Fžllesskabs udviklingspolitik vedtaget, og her er miljż et tvžrgende princip. 
There are basically two types of intervention through which the donor community has sought to address the environmental aspects of development cooperation: adopted which included environment as a cross-cutting issue.
Den konsensus om udviklingspolitikken, som Europa-Kommissionen, medlemsstaterne og Europa-Parlamentet blev enige om i december 2005, har ikke blot bevaret miljż som et tvžrgende princip, men ogs gjort miljż og naturressourcer til et af de ni prioriterede indsatsomrder. 
The development policy consensus agreed between the European Commission, the Member States and the European Parliament in December 2005 not only maintained the environment as a cross-cutting issue but also made environment and natural resources one of nine priority sectors for funding.
Revisionens omfang og revisionsmetode 4. 
Audit scope and approach 4.
I betragtning af miljżets centrale rolle som en af de tre sżjler i bžredygtig udvikling og dets betydning som et af rtusindudviklingsmlene (UM) udfżrte Den Europžiske Revisionsret i 2005 en revision af Kommissionens forvaltning af miljżaspektet i forbindelse med dens udviklingssamarbejde med udviklingslandene i Asien og Latinamerika, landene i det sydlige Middelhavsomrde og gruppen af stater i Afrika, Vestindien og Stillehavet. 
In view of the environmentŐs key role as one of the three pillars of sustainable development and its importance as one of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the European Court of Auditors carried out an audit in 2005 of the European CommissionŐs management of the environmental aspects of its development cooperation with Asian and Latin American developing countries, southern Mediterranean countries and the African, Caribbean and Pacific group of States.
Mere specifikt koncentrerede revisionen sig om fżlgende centrale spżrgsml (1): a) Har Kommissionen en generel og sammenhžngende strategi for, hvordan miljżaspektet skal behandles i forbindelse med dens udviklingssamarbejde, og har den truffet passende forvaltningsforanstaltninger til gennemfżrelse af strategien og til bedżmmelse af de miljżmžssige resultater af udviklingsbistanden? b) Har Kommissionen rent faktisk integreret miljżet i hele sit udviklingssamarbejde? c) Har de miljżprogrammer og -projekter, som Kommissionen finansierer, vžret effektive? 
More specifically, the audit focused on the following key questions (1): (a) does the Commission have a comprehensive overall strategy to deal with the environmental aspects of its development cooperation and has it made adequate management arrangements for implementing its strategy and assessing the environmental performance of its development aid? (b) has the Commission effectively mainstreamed the environment into all of its development cooperation? (c) have the environment programmes and projects financed by the Commission been effective?
Det er ikke nemt at definere begrebet miljż. 
Environment is not an easy term to define.
I forbindelse med denne revision skal miljż for det fżrste forsts i den relativt snžvre betydning, der er defineret af OECDŐs Komit for Udviklingsbistand (DAC) med henblik p projektklassificering (jf. bilag I). 
For the purpose of this audit, environment was understood in the first place in accordance with the relatively narrow sense defined by the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) for project classification purposes (see Annex I).
Der blev endvidere ogs taget hensyn til sektorerne for naturlige ressourcer (skov, vand, fiskeri), og revisionen koncentrerede sig om en af disse, nemlig skovbrug (2). 
In addition, the audit also took into consideration the natural resource sectors (forestry, water, fisheries) and focused on one of these areas, namely for-estry(2).
Forpligtelserne til (1) Under behandlingen af disse spżrgsml tog revisorerne hensyn til de retningslinjer for miljżrevision, der er udstedt af INTOSAI (International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions). 
The commitments for programmes and projects (1) When addressing these key questions, the audit took into account the environmental auditing guidelines of the International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI).
(2) Den vigtigste rsag til, at man koncentrerede sig om skovbrug, er, at Kommissionen har en sžrlig budgetpost til tropiske og andre skove (jf. punkt 10). 
(2) The main reason for focusing on forestry is that the Commission has a special budget line for tropical and other forests (see paragraph 10).
I 2004 blev der oprettet en sžrlig AVS-EU-vandfacilitet, s her er der stadig tale om en tidlig fase i gennemfżrelsen. a) b) finansiering af programmer og projekter, hvis vigtigste ml er at forbedre miljżbetingelserne integration af miljżhensyn i alle former for udviklingsprogrammer og -projekter, hvilket betegnes ČmainstreamingÇ. 
While a special ACP-EU Water Facility was created in 2004, this is still at an early stage of implementation. (a) (b) the financing of programmes and projects whose principal objective is to improve environmental conditions; the integration of environmental concerns into all other types of development programmes and projects.