natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
DEN EUROPŽISKE REVISIONSRET 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tlf. +352 4398-1 Kontakt: eca.europa.eu/da/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Websted: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA Yderligere oplysninger om EU fs p internet via Europaserveren (http://europa.eu) Luxembourg: Den Europžiske Unions Publikationskontor, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-5018-6 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-5011-7 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-5057-5 ISSN 1831-0796 ISSN 1977-5636 ISSN 1977-5636 doi:10.2865/4578 doi:10.2865/648557 doi:10.2865/819170 QJ-AB-16-014-DA-C QJ-AB-16-014-DA-N QJ-AB-16-014-DA-E Š Den Europžiske Union, 2016 Eftertryk tilladt med kildeangivelse Tilladelse til at anvende eller gengive tabellen p side 36 og kortet p side 37 skal indhentes direkte hos indehaveren af ophavsrettigheden. DA 2016 Sžrberetning nr. 
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Enquiries: eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Website: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-5012-4 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-5016-2 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-5076-6 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/292235 doi:10.2865/92371 doi:10.2865/71466 QJ-AB-16-014-EN-C QJ-AB-16-014-EN-N QJ-AB-16-014-EN-E © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
15 Forvaltede Kommissionen den humanitžre bistand til konfliktramte befolkningsgrupper i De Store Sżers Omrde i Afrika effektivt? (artikel 287, stk. 4, andet afsnit, TEUF) 
EN 2016 Special Report NO 15 in the African Great Lakes Region? (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) Did the Commission effectively manage the Humanitarian aid provided to populations affected by conflicts
Denne forvaltningsrevision blev udfżrt af Revisionsafdeling III, hvis speciale er udgiftsomrdet foranstaltninger udadtil. 
This performance audit was produced by Chamber III of the ECA, which is responsible for the audit of the external actions’ spending areas.
Afdelingsformand Karel Pinxten var rapporterende medlem. 
Mr Karel Pinxten, Dean of this Chamber, is the reporting Member.
I forbindelse med revisionsarbejdet blev han bistet af kabinetschef Gerard Madden, Grald Locatelli og Beatrix Lesiewicz, som var ansvarlige for stżtte og kvalitetskontrol, opgaveansvarlig Myriam Cazzaniga samt revisorerne Kim Hubl, Peter Kovacs, Cyril Messein og Roberto Ruiz Ruiz. 
He was supported in the preparation of the report by the Head of his office, Gerard Madden; Gérald Locatelli and Beatrix Lesiewicz, support and quality control; Myriam Cazzaniga, Head of Task; Kim Hublé, Peter Kovacs, Cyril Messein and Roberto Ruiz Ruiz, auditors.
Fra venstre mod hżjre: Cyril Messein, Myriam Cazzaniga, Karel Pinxten, Kim Hubl og Roberto Ruiz Ruiz. 
From left to right: C. Messein, M. Cazzaniga, K. Pinxten, K. Hublé, R. Ruiz Ruiz.
Indhold 03 Punkt Akronymer og forkortelser I-IX Resum 1-10 Indledning 11-12 Revisionens omfang og revisionsmetoden 13-55 Bemžrkninger 13-31 Finansieringen blev ydet til veletablerede hovedprioriteter, men den senere prioritering var ikke tilstržkkelig klar 14-17 Kommissionen identificerede behovene for De Store Sżers Omrde korrekt 18-24 Kommissionens reaktion er passende 25-31 Utilstržkkelig gennemsigtighed i projektudvžlgelsesfasen 32-44 Samlet set er Kommissionens overvgning passende, men de indhentede oplysninger kan udnyttes bedre 33-40 I de fleste tilfžlde fr Kommissionen tilstržkkelige oplysninger om projektgennemfżrelsen 41-44 Opfżlgningen er utilstržkkelig 45-55 De fleste af de projekter, vi undersżgte, leverede tilfredsstillende resultater 46-49 Generelt er resultaterne positive, men i nogle tilfžlde er Kommissionens vurdering ikke klart begrundet 50-52 Kommissionen var lydhżr over for žndringer, men kunne begrunde de ydede fristforlžngelser bedre 53-55 Der findes kun begržnset dokumentation for, hvad der gżres for at sammenkoble nżdhjžlp, rehabilitering og udvikling 56-63 Konklusioner og anbefalinger 
Contents 03 Paragraph I–IX 1–10 11–12 13–55 13–31 14–17 18–24 25–31 32–44 33–40 41–44 45–55 46–49 50–52 53–55 56–63 Acronyms and abbreviations Executive summary Introduction Audit scope and approach Observations Funding allocated to well established main priorities but insufficient clarity at further prioritisation stage The Commission has properly identified needs for the AGL region The Commission’s response is appropriate Insufficient transparency at the project selection stage Overall, the Commission’s monitoring is appropriate although the information obtained could be better used In most cases, the Commission obtains adequate information on project implementation Follow‐up is insufficient Most of the projects examined delivered satisfactory results Overall outcomes achieved are positive but in some cases, the Commission’s assessment is not clearly justified The Commission was responsive to changes but could better justify time extensions granted There is limited evidence of what is being done to link Relief, Rehabilitation and Development Conclusions and recommendations
Indhold 04 Bilag I Bilag II Bilag III Bilag IV Bilag V Bilag VI Ń Kort over De Store Sżers Omrde i Afrika Ń Flygtninge fra Den Demokratiske Republik Congo pr. begyndelsen af 2016 Ń Kort over flygtninge fra Burundi pr. 26. januar 2016 Ń Liste over reviderede projekter Ń Gennemgede forelżbige og endelige rapporter Ń Žndringer af de gennemgede projekter Kommissionens svar 
Contents 04 Annex I Annex II Annex III Annex IV Annex V Annex VI — Map of the African Great Lakes Region — DRC refugees at the beginning of 2016 — Map Burundian refugees at 26 January 2016 — List of projects examined — Interim and final reports examined — Amendments to projects reviewed Reply of the Commission
Akronymer 05 og forkortelser AGL: African Great Lakes Ń De Store Sżers Omrde i Afrika DR Congo: Den Demokratiske Republik Congo EUF: Den Europžiske Udviklingsfond EU-Udenrigstjenesten: Tjenesten for EUŐs Optržden Udadtil GD ECHO: Generaldirektoratet for Humanitžr Bistand og Civilbeskyttelse GD for Internationalt Samarbejde og Udvikling: Generaldirektoratet for Internationalt Samarbejde og Udvikling Gennemfżrelsesplan: Gennemfżrelsesplan for humanitžr indsats IO: International Organisation LRRD: Linking Relief and Rehabilitation with Development - Sammenkobling af nżdhjžlp, rehabilitering og udvikling NGO: Ikkestatslig organisation OCHA: Kontoret for Koordinering af Humanitžre Anliggender (FN-agentur) 
Acronyms and 05 abbreviations AGL: African Great Lakes DG International Cooperation and Development: Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development DG ECHO: Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection DRC: Democratic Republic of the Congo EAR: Emergency Aid Reserve EDF: European Development Fund EEAS: European External Action Service HAP: Humanitarian Action Plan HIP: Humanitarian Implementation Plan IDP: Internally Displaced People IHL: International Humanitarian Law IO: International organisation LRRD: Linking Relief and Rehabilitation with Development NFI: Non Food Items NGO: Non-governmental organisation NIP: National Indicative Programme OCHA: Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN agency)
Resum 06 IDe Store Sżers Omrde i Afrika har i de seneste rtier vžret plaget af konflikter, hvilket har fżrt til massive fordrivelser af befolkninger med alvorlige humanitžre konsekvenser. 
Executive summary 06 IThe African Great Lakes area has in recent decades been beset by conflicts, which have resulted in huge population displacements with severe humanitarian consequences.
Kommissionen har finansieret projekter for humanitžr bistand i dette omrde siden 1994 og arbejder fortsat p at hndtere fżlgerne af konflikter og uro. 
The Commission has funded humanitarian projects in this area since 1994, and is continuing with its efforts to tackle the consequences of the conflicts and unrest.
II P nuvžrende tidspunkt er det omrde, der er mest berżrt, Den Demokratiske Republik Congo, hvor der er ca. 1,6 millioner internt fordrevne. 
II At present, the area most affected is the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which has about 1.6 million internally displaced people.
I żjeblikket er der ca. 437 000 congolesiske flygtninge i nabolandene, isžr i Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda og Tanzania. 
Currently, there are about 437 000 Congolese refugees in the neighbouring countries, mainly in Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda and Tanzania.
Urolighederne i Burundi i 2015 har żget det samlede antal flygtninge med ca. 236 000. 
The unrest in Burundi in 2015 has added about 236 000 to the overall figure for refugees.
Der ydes ikke kun humanitžr bistand til flygtninge og fordrevne, men ogs til den lokale befolkning, som er fanget i konflikterne, eller som giver husly til flygtninge og fordrevne personer. 
In addition to the refugees and the displaced persons, humanitarian aid is also given to the local populations who are caught up in the conflicts or are hosting refugees and displaced persons.
III Denne stżtte bestr i tilvejebringelse af husly, fżdevarer, sundhedspleje og andre basale serviceydelser. 
III This aid consists of the provision of shelter, food, health care and other basic services.
I forbindelse med tilvejebringelsen af denne bistand arbejder Kommissionen tžt sammen med internationale ikkestatslige organisationer, FN-agenturer og andre internationale organisationer. 
To provide this aid the Commission works in close cooperation with international non-governmental organisations, United Nations agencies and other international organisations.
I perioden 2011-2015 blev der ydet ca. 300 millioner euro i humanitžr bistand til De Store Sżers Omrde i Afrika. 
The amount spent on humanitarian assistance in the African Great Lakes area over the period 2011-2015 was about 300 million euros.
IV Revisorerne konkluderer, at Kommissionen generelt forvaltede den humanitžre bistand til de befolkningsgrupper, der er berżrt af konflikter i De Store Sżers Omrde i Afrika, effektivt. 
IV The auditors conclude that humanitarian aid to the population affected by conflict, in the African Great Lakes area was, generally, managed effectively by the Commission.
Den behovsvurdering, der blev udfżrt, var džkkende, og der var den nżdvendige fleksibilitet til at reagere hurtigt p žndrede omstžndigheder. 
The needs assessment carried out was comprehensive and the flexibility to react quickly to changing circumstances was ensured.
De fleste af de undersżgte projekter gav tilfredsstillende resultater med hensyn til at imżdeg de sžrlige udfordringer, landene str over for. 
Most of the projects examined were satisfactory in responding to the particular challenges faced.
Vi konstaterede imidlertid en ržkke svagheder. 
However, a number of weaknesses were identified.
VDer manglede dokumentation i forbindelse med fastlžggelsen af geografiske prioriteter og vurderingen af projektforslag. 
VThere was a lack of documentary evidence at the stages of determining geographical priorities and assessing project proposals.
Det var derfor ikke muligt at afgżre, om de valgte projekter opfyldte de relevante kriterier, og om det var de mest relevante projekter, der blev udvalgt. 
As a result it was not possible to determine whether the projects chosen complied with the relevant criteria and if the most appropriate projects were selected.
Resum 07 VI Overvgningsrammen var passende i betragtning af de vanskelige arbejdsvilkr. 
Executive summary 07 VI The monitoring framework was appropriate given the difficult working environment.
Rapporterne fra partnerne kom imidlertid ofte for sent, og det gjorde dem mindre anvendelige. 
The reports from the partners were, however, frequently late and this hampered their usefulness.
Den ekspertise, som Kommissionens personale p stedet besad, var nyttig for de partnere, der blev finansieret, men rapporteringen fra besżgene p stedet var ikke tilstržkkelig džkkende. 
The expertise of the Commission’s field staff was helpful to the funded partners but reporting from the field visits was not sufficiently comprehensive.
P grund af utilstržkkelig registrering af opfżlgningen p de rejste problemer var det ikke muligt at sikre, at disse blev lżst p en tilfredsstillende mde. 
Because of inadequate recording of the follow-up of problems raised, it was not possible to ensure that these were satisfactorily resolved.
P et mere overordnet plan findes der ingen rapportering om gennemfżrelsesplanen for den humanitžre indsats med en oversigt over resultaterne og de indhżstede erfaringer. VII Generelt var de resultater, der blev opnet i forbindelse med de undersżgte projekter, tilfredsstillende. n partner formede dog at anvende det meste af sit budget og kun n en lille procentdel af de planlagte resultater. 
On a more global level there is no reporting on the Humanitarian Implementation Plan (HIP) to provide an overview of results and lessons learnt. VII The results achieved overall for the projects examined were satisfactory. One partner, however, managed to spend most of its budget despite achieving a small percentage of the planned results.
I nogle f tilfžlde var begrundelsen for forlžngelse af frister og supplerende budgetter ikke klar. Hvad angr Kommissionens egen vurdering af resultater, fremgik det i visse tilfžlde ikke klart af de foreliggende oplysninger, hvordan den var net frem til sine konklusioner. 
In a few cases the justification for time extensions and additional budgets was not apparent. As regards the Commission’s own assessment of results it was unclear, in some cases, from the information available, how they arrived at their conclusions.
VIII Selv om det er bredt accepteret af Kommissionen og blandt andre donorer, at det er hensigtsmžssigt at sammenkoble nżdhjžlp, rehabilitering og udvikling (LRRD), er der meget f eksempler p, at dette er gjort i praksis. 
VIII While the desirability of Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development (LRRD) has been widely accepted by the Commission and other donors, there are very few examples of this being applied in practice.
Hvis ikke dette ml forfżlges meget aktivt, er der en fare for, at det ikke vil vžre muligt at g fra humanitžr bistand til udviklingsbistand. 
Without very actively pursuing this goal there is a danger that opportunities to move from humanitarian aid to development aid will be missed.
IX Der fremsžttes en ržkke anbefalinger i punkt 58 til 63 i beretningen, som har til forml at sžtte Kommissionen i stand til at forbedre sin forvaltning af humanitžr bistand i og uden for De Store Sżers Omrde. 
IX A number of recommendations are made in paragraphs 58 to 63 of the report which are designed to enable the Commission to improve its management of humanitarian aid in the Great Lakes area and beyond.
Indledning 08 01 De Store Sżers Omrde i Afrika omfatter landene Burundi, Den Demokratiske Republik Congo (DR Congo), Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania og Uganda (jf. kortet i bilag I). 
Introduction 08 01 The African Great Lakes (AGL) region comprises the countries of Burundi, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda (see map in Annex I).
Omrdet har oplevet nogle af de vžrste konflikter p det afrikanske kontinent i lżbet af de seneste rtier. 
It has witnessed some of the worst conflicts on the African continent over the last decades.
I det żstlige Congo fortsžtter vžbnede grupper, herunder den congolesiske hžr, med at kržnke menneskerettighederne og beg overgreb og plyndringer samt voldshandlinger ssom voldtžgt, bortfż-relse og tvangsrekruttering af bżrn. 
In Eastern Congo, armed groups, including the Congolese Army, continue to commit human rights abuse, exactions, looting accompanied by violence like rape, abduction, and forced recruitment of children.
Den deraf fżlgende humanitžre krise i Den Demokratiske Republik Congo (DR Congo) er blandt verdens mest komplekse og langvarige nżdsituationer i et af verdens fattigste lande1. 
The resulting humanitarian crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is among the world’s most complex and protracted emergencies in one of the world’s poorest countries1.
I slutningen af april 2015 udlżste pržsidentvalget i Burundi, der fandt sted i juli, en spiral af vold og uro, som sendte flere hundrede tusinde mennesker p vejene p flugt fra deres land. 
At the end of April 2015, presidential elections in Burundi, that took place in July, triggered a spiral of violence and unrest that sent hundreds of thousands on the roads fleeing their country.
02 Ved udgangen af 2015 var der omkring 1,6 millioner internt fordrevne personer i DR Congo og mere end 437 000 congolesiske flygtninge (jf. bilag II) i nabolandene, navnlig i Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda og Tanzania. 
02 Towards the end of 2015, there were about 1.6 million Internally Displaced People (IDPs) in the DRC and more than 437 000 Congolese refugees (see Annex II) in the neighbouring countries, namely in Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda and Tanzania.
Ved udgangen af januar 2016 var 236 000 burundiere flygtet fra deres land og befinder sig nu hovedsageligt i flygtningelejre i Rwanda og Tanzania (jf. bilag III, som viser antallet af burundiske flygtninge pr. land i regionen). 
At the end of January 2016, 236 000 Burundians have fled their country and are now mostly hosted in refugee camps in Rwanda and Tanzania (see Annex III about the number of Burundian refugees per country of the region).
Bosžttelse for internt fordrevne i Kibabi - Kishusha, Masisi, Nordkivu (6 360 personer ved udgangen af august 2015) 1 Landet ligger placeret som nr. 176 ud af 188 lande p De Forenede Nationers Udviklingsprograms 2014-indeks for menneskelig udvikling. 
Internally Displaced People (IDP) settlement of Kibabi ‐ Kishusha, Masisi, North Kivu (6 360 people at the end of August 2015) 1 It is ranked 176th, out of 188, in the world on the UNDP Human Development Index for 2014.
Burundi ligger som nr. 184, Rwanda og Uganda som nr. 
Burundi is 184th, Rwanda and Uganda are 163th and Tanzania is 151th.
Indledning 09 03 Artikel 214 i traktaten om Den Europžiske Unions funktionsmde danner grundlaget for EUŐs forpligtelse til at yde humanitžr bistand i form af bistand, nżdhjžlp og beskyttelse til ofre for naturkatastrofer og menneskeskabte katastrofer verden over. 
Picture 1 Introduction 09 03 Article 214 of the Treaty of on the functioning of the EU underpins the commitment of the EU to provide humanitarian aid consisting of assistance, relief and protection to victims of natural and man-made disasters around the world.
Den overordnede politikramme for humanitžr bistand er skitseret i Čden europžiske konsensus om humanitžr bistandÇ fra 20082. 
The overall policy framework for humanitarian assistance is outlined in the ‘European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid’ of 20082.
I dette politiske dokument fastlžgges EUŐs vision p basis af fžlles principper, der har til forml at forbedre sammenhžngen, effektiviteten og kvaliteten af EUŐs humanitžre indsats. 
This political document sets out the EU’s vision based on common principles aiming at improving the coherence, effectiveness and quality of its humanitarian response.
04 De vigtigste ml (jf. tekstboks 1) og bestemmelser om gennemfżrelse og forvaltning af Kommissionens humanitžre bistand er fastsat i forordningen om humanitžr bistand fra 19963. 
04 The principal objectives (see Box 1) and provisions for the implementation and administration of humanitarian aid by the Commission are laid out in the Humanitarian Aid Regulation of 19963.
Bistanden er rettet mod de mest srbare befolkninger og er baseret p de humanitžre principper om medmenneskelighed, neutralitet, upartiskhed og uafhžngighed. 
Its assistance targets the most vulnerable populations and is based on the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.
Der ydes ogs stżtte til forsvar for humanitžrt arbejde samt overholdelse af humanitžre principper og international folkeret. 
It also provides support for the defence of humanitarian work and the respect of humanitarian principles and international humanitarian law (IHL).
2 Fžlles erklžring fra Rdet og repržsentanterne for medlemsstaternes regeringer, forsamlet i Rdet, Europa-Parlamentet og Europa-Kommissionen (EUT C 25 af 30.1.2008, s. 
2 Joint Statement by the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission (OJ C 25, 30.1.2008, p.
1257/96 af 20. juni 1996 om humanitžr bistand (EFT L 163 af 2.7.1996, s. 
3 Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning humanitarian aid (OJ L 163, 2.7.1996, p.
4 Artikel 2 i Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 1257/96. 
4 Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96.
Indledning 10 05 Kommissionens oprindeligt tildelte budget5 til humanitžr bistand til De Store Sżers Omrde har ligget mellem 52 millioner euro i 2011 og 47 millioner euro i 2015. 
Introduction 10 05 For the AGL region, the initial budget5 allocated by the Commission for humanitarian aid ranged between 52 million euros in 2011 and 47 million euros in 2015.
Efter modtagelsen af supplerende finansiering fra EUŐs nżdhjžlpsreserve6 eller fra Den Europžiske Udviklingsfond (EUF)7 l det anvendte belżb i gennemsnit p 63 millioner euro om ret (jf. figur 1). 
The amount spent after receiving the top-up funding from the EU Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR)6 or from the European Development Fund (EDF)7 reached, on average, 63 million euros annually (see Graph 1).
Ud over disse belżb brugte Kommissionen rligt ca. 1,8 millioner euro p sit lokale kontor i DR Congo og 7 millioner euro til lufttransport i De Store Sżers Omrde8. 
In addition to these amounts, the Commission spent, annually, about 1.8 million euros for its field office in the DRC and 7 million euros for aerial transport in the AGL region8.
06 Som bidragyder inden for humanitžr bistand kanaliserer Kommissionen sin globale finansiering gennem ca. 200 partnere9, som den har indget rammepartnerskabsaftaler (FPA)10 med med en varighed af fire til fem r. 
06 As a humanitarian aid donor, the Commission’s worldwide funding is channelled through about 200 partners9 with whom they have signed a framework partnership agreement (FPA)10 for a duration of 4 to 5 years.
Disse partnere er internationale ikkestatslige organisationer (NGOŐer), internationale organisationer (IOŐer)11 eller agenturer under De Forenede Nationer (FN). 
These partners are international non-governmental organisations (NGOs), international organisations (IOs)11 or agencies from the United Nations (UN).
I De Store Sżers Omrde var fordelingen: 46 % NGOŐer, 7,3 % IOŐer og 46,7 % FN. 
In the AGL region, the split was: 46 % NGOs, 7.3 % IOs and 46.7 % UN.
Under hensyntagen til den humanitžre bistands sžrlige karakter varede de finansierede projekter mellem et par mneder og 18 mneder. 
Given the specificities of humanitarian aid, the projects funded last between a couple of months and 18 months.
07 Hvert r tržffer Kommissionen beslutning om fordelingen af den indledende budgetramme for humanitžr bistand i en global afgżrelse. 
07 Annually the Commission decides on the allocation of the initial budgetary envelope for humanitarian aid in a worldwide decision.
Forslagene til indsatsen i de enkelte kriser, lande eller regioner samt det tilhżrende budget beskrives nžrmere i gennemfżrelsesplanen for den humanitžre indsats og det tekniske bilag (med operationelle anbefalinger), som udarbejdes p grundlag af en behovsvurdering. 
The proposed responses per crisis, country or region as well as the corresponding budget are detailed in the Humanitarian Implementation Plans (HIP) and Technical Annex (including operational recommendations), established on the basis of a needs assessment.
Gennemfżrelsesplanen fungerer som mandat for partnerne, nr de udarbejder deres anmodninger om finansiering. 
The HIP serves as terms of reference for the partners when preparing their requests for funding.