natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Af den evaluering, Kommissionen har foretaget, er desuden fremget fżlgende: Ń Indsatsen har direkte berżrt over 600 000 personer og har gjort det muligt at yde social, materiel og medicinsk bistand under vanskelige omstžndigheder. Ń Fonden opfattes meget positivt af de organisationer, som ivžrksžtter projekterne. Ń Selv om nogle medlemsstater rder over stżrre ressourcer end andre, nr det gžlder asyl, har fonden bidraget til gradvis at f indfżrt en fžlles asylpolitik, baseret p fžllesskabsbestemmelserne. 
The evaluation carried out by the Commission also demonstrated that: Ń social, material and medical assistance was provided in difficult circumstances under the projects carried out, which directly concerned over 600 000 persons, Ń the organisations which carried out the projects take a very positive view of the Fund, Ń seen from the angle of the Member States, some of which have more budgetary resources than others in the field of asylum, the Fund has helped to gradually establish a common asylum policy governed by Community legislation.
Kommissionen mener, at den har foretaget en rimelig fordeling af ERFŐs budgetmidler mellem 2000 og 2004 p trods af de statistiske problemer. 
The Commission believes it ensured an equitable allocation of the ERF budget appropriations from 2000 to 2004 despite statistical constraints.
Det endelige forml med at indsamle statistiske oplysninger er at kunne vurdere byrden for de enkelte medlemsstater korrekt, sledes at det bliver muligt at foretage en retfžrdig fordeling p EU-niveau af udgifterne til ERF-foranstaltningerne. 
The ultimate objective of gathering statistical data is to correctly assess the burden on each Member State so that the cost of ERF projects can be spread fairly throughout the European Union.
Der foregr desuden en lżbende forbedring af de statistiske oplysningers kvalitet. 
The quality of statistical data is gradually being improved.
(1) SEK(2006) 1636 Ń Endelig evaluering af Den Europžiske Flygtinge-fond for perioden 2000-2004. 
(1) SEC(2006) 1636, Final evaluation of the European Refugee Fund for the period 2000 to 2004.
Kommissionen erkender, at nogle af gennemfżrelsesbestemmelserne for ERF blev offentliggjort med en betydelig forsinkelse. 
The Commission acknowledges that there was a significant delay in publishing some of the ERFŐs implementing rules.
Gennemfżrelsesbestemmelserne blev pržsenteret og drżftet i udvalget bestende af repržsentanter for medlemsstaterne i god tid inden deres vedtagelse. 
The implementing rules were presented to, and discussed by, the Committee of Member State representatives well before their adoption.
Proceduren for tildeling af midler var ikke optimal under ERF I, og der er allerede foretaget en ržkke forenklinger. 
The fund allocation procedure under ERF I was not perfect and some simplifications have already been made.
Kommissionen mener, at kun den nuvžrende procedure kan sikre, at bevillingerne fra ERF hurtigst muligt bliver anvendt i medlemsstaterne p grundlag af et detaljeret rligt program, der forud er godkendt af Kommissionen. 
The Commission considers the current procedure is the only way of ensuring ERF funds are deployed as quickly as possible in the Member States on the basis of detailed annual programmes which have been given the CommissionŐs prior approval.
Kommissionen accepterer at fortsžtte sin oplysningsvirk-somhed over for medlemsstaterne med hensyn til ERF-reglerne, men den mener ikke, at forskellene mellem medlemsstaterne, for s vidt angr gennemfżrelsen af de nationale foranstaltninger, er udtryk for forskellige fortolkninger af retsgrundlaget, men at de skyldes en tilpasning af foranstaltningerne til de nationale behov. 
Although it will of course continue its efforts to provide clarification and guidance to the Member States on the ERFŐs rules, the Commission believes that differences in the way Member States implement national projects reflect the fact that projects are tailored to national needs rather than different interpretations of the FundŐs legal basis.
Kommissionen har ptaget sig en rdgivnings-og over-vgningsrolle over for medlemsstaterne, selv om en sdan opgave ikke var foreskrevet i retsgrundlaget. 
The Commission has played an advisory and monitoring role in relation to the Member States even though monitoring was not an obligation laid down in the FundŐs legal basis.
Nr det er nżdvendigt, tržffer Kommissionen de korrigerende foranstaltninger, der er foreskrevet i retsgrundlaget. 
Whenever necessary, the Commission takes the across-the-board corrective measures provided for in the FundŐs legal basis.
49-50. 
49 and 50.
Kommissionen har Ń ganske rigtigt med forsinkelse Ń offentliggjort konklusionerne af evalueringen af ERF for perioden 2000-2004. 
The Commission was late, as it has acknowledged, in publishing the conclusions of the ERF evaluation for the period 2000 to 2004.
Der forel imidlertid rlige evalueringer i de enkelte medlemsstater. 
Annual evaluations were nevertheless carried out in each Member State.
Med et begržnset budget har ERF kunnet yde bistand til et stort antal mennesker (600 000 personer). 
Despites it small budget the ERF has helped a huge number of persons (600 000).
Den har i en ržkke medlemsstater gjort det muligt at lempe eller skžrpe lovgivningen og praksis p asylomrdet. 
In many Member States it has helped to adapt or strengthen asylum legislation and practices.
Kommissionen accepterer anbefalingen af en stżrre harmonisering af statistikkerne. 
The Commission accepts the recommendation for greater harmonisation of statistics.
Den vil sammen med medlemsstaterne sżge at udarbejde retningslinjer for en mere pržcis validering af dataene. 
It will work out with Member States ways of ensuring more effective validation of data.
Kommissionen mener dog, at man m acceptere en vis risiko for, at dataene ikke er af bedste kvalitet i betragtning af de indsamlede datas art. 
The Commission considers that a slight risk of poor quality data has to be accepted in view of the nature of the information gathered.
Den forordning, Kommissionen foreslog i september 2005 om statistikker vedrżrende asyl og immigration, skulle gżre det muligt at lżse problemet vedrżrende indsamling af statistikker p asylomrdet fra dens ikrafttrždelse, ligesom Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne bżr żge deres samarbejde. 
The Regulation proposed by the Commission in September 2005 on asylum and immigration statistics should overcome this problem once it starts to have an impact on the gathering of asylum data and the Commission and Member States will have to work together more closely.
Den nye ERF (2008-2013) vil omfatte foranstaltninger, der skal żge kapaciteten til at indsamle, analysere og formidle statistikker. 
The new ERF (2008 to 2013) will include actions enhancing the capacity to collect, analyse and disseminate statistics.
31.7.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 178/23 52. 
31.7.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/23 52.
Kommissionen accepterer Rettens anbefaling med hensyn til anvendelse af reviderede statistikker, men den mener, at den allerede tager hensyn til ex post-revisionerne af de tidligere r, nr den anvender de mest ajourfżrte data for de seneste tre r til at fordele bevillingerne for et givet referencer. 
The Commission accepts the recommendation concerning the need to make use of the revised statistics but considers it already takes account of ex post revisions of data for previous years by using the most up-to-date data for the previous three years to allocate funds for a reference year.
Denne procedure er i overensstemmelse med retsgrundlaget og med EU-budgettets princip om etrighed. 
This procedure is compatible with the FundŐs legal basis and the annual nature of the Community budget.
Den aktuelle strategi vedrżrende de statistikker, der anvendes til bevillingstildelingen, er et resultat af indgende og vanskelige drżftelser med Rdet under forhandlingerne om retsgrundlaget. 
The current statistical approach used as a basis for the allocation of funds is the result of detailed and difficult discussions with the Council during the negotiation of the FundŐs legal basis.
Tildeling af faste belżb anvendes allerede delvist (med en minimumsgržnse for hver medlemsstat). Kommissionen mener ikke, at den kan forpligte sig mere i denne retning, og at bevillingerne ikke kan tildeles udelukkende p grundlag af faste belżb, da dette vil skabe tvivl om ERFŐs grundlžggende mlsžtning, som er en fordeling p EU-niveau af byrden i forbindelse med forvaltning af flygtninge og fordrevne. 
The allocation of fixed amounts has already been used on occasion (minimum threshold by Member State), but the Commission does not believe it can go further in this direction or that funds can be allocated totally on a fixed amount basis without calling into question the ERFŐs fundamental objective which is to spread the burden of managing refugees and displaced persons within the European Union.
Kommissionen accepterer Rettens anbefaling af drżftelser med Rdet og Parlamentet om klarhed og pržcision i reglerne om stżtteberettigelse, men den understreger, at forhandlingen med henblik p vedtagelse af retsgrundlaget for ERF for perioden 2008-2013 allerede gav anledning til en indgende drżftelse af foranstaltningerne og de stżtteberettigede mlgrupper. Problematikken vedrżrende, hvilke personer der er berettigede til at modtage stżtte til en hjemsendelsesforanstaltning, vil blive lżst med ikrafttrždelsen af den europžiske tilbagesendelsesfond. 
The Commission accepts the recommendation that discussions be initiated with the Council and Parliament on the clarity and precision of the eligibility rules. It would, however, point out that there was an in-depth discussion of eligible projects and target groups during negotiation of the legal basis for ERF 2008 to 2013. The issue of persons eligible for repatriation will be resolved when the European Return Fund comes into force.
27.11.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 285/1 IV (Oplysninger) OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPŽISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER OG ORGANER REVISIONSRETTEN SŽRBERETNING Nr. 5/2007 om Kommissionens forvaltning af CARDS-programmet, med Kommissionens svar (artikel 248, stk. 4, andet afsnit, EF) (2007/C 285/01) INDHOLD FORKORTELSER ....................................................................... 
27.11.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 285/1 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 5/2007 on the CommissionŐs Management of the CARDS programme together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) (2007/C 285/01) CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................
3 RESUM .................................................................. 
SUMMARY ................................................................
REVISIONSMETODEOGREVISIONENSOMFANG ................................. 
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................
Svagheder ved den strategiske vejledning i planlžgningsprocessen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
OBSERVATIONS............................................................
LSDŐer for bredt formuleret, FVPŐer uden klare prioriteter, mangel p effektiv bistandsvejledning................................................... 
CSPs too broadly formulated, MIPs without clear priorities, lack of effective guidance ofaid.............................................................
Svagheder ved den strategiske vejledning gav gennemfżrelsesproblemer . . . . . . . . . 
Weaknesses in strategic guidance lead to implementation problems . . . . . . . . . . . .
Omlžgning af bistanden fra investeringsstżtte til institutionsopbygning . . . . . . . . . Produktive forvaltningsstrukturer sikrede, at bistanden blev ydet hurtigt, men gav den nationaleadministrativekapacitetenudfordring ............................... Forvaltningsstrukturernevarikkealtidhensigtsmžssige...................... 
Efficient management structures ensured speedy delivery of aid but national administra-tivecapacitychallenged .................................................. Managementstructuresnotalwaysappropriate ............................ Aid delivered rapidly but without taking sufficiently into account recipient countriesŐ absorptioncapacity..................................................
Bistand ydet hurtigt, men uden tilstržkkelig hensyntagen til modtagerlandenes absorberingskapacitet .................................................... 
Limited recipient country responsibilities in the project identification and tendering phases............................................................
Inkonsekventtilgangtilovervgningogevaluering ............................. I-VIII 4 1-7 5 8-10 5 11-60 6 11-27 6 11-19 6 20 7 21-27 7 28-41 9 28-37 9 38-41 11 42-54 12 45-52 12 53-54 14 55-60 14 Punkt Side 
Lackofcountryownershipofdonorcoordination.......................... Inconsistentapproachtomonitoringandevaluation ............................ I-VIII 1-7 8-10 11-60 11-27 11-19 20 21-27 28-41 28-37 38-41 42-54 45-52 53-54 55-60 Paragraph Page 3 4 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 9 9 11 12 12 14 14
C 285/2 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 27.11.2007 Punkt Side KONKLUSIONEROGANBEFALINGER .......................................... 
C 285/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.11.2007 CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS .....................................
62-64 15 Var de forvaltningstilgange, som Kommissionen havde etableret og anvendte, velegnede ogproduktive? ......................................................... 
How far was the strategic guidance directing the programmes appropriate and coherent?..............................................................
68-69 16 Var overvgningen og evalueringen effektive til at identificere svagheder og sprede infor-mation,ogvarKommissionensopfżlgningveltimet? ............................ 
How far were the management approaches established and used by the Commission appropriateandefficient? .................................................
70 16 Kommissionens svar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... 19 
Paragraph Page 61-70 15 61 15 62-64 15 65-67 15 68-69 16 70 16 TheCommissionŐsreplies .............................................................. 19
27.11.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 285/3 AUF BIH CARDS CFCU ECPA EGA ELARG EU EURALIUS FN FRJ FVP HS Ipa KFOR LSD OSCE RELEX ROM SAP UNMIK Den albanske udviklingsfond Bosnien-Hercegovina FORKORTELSER fžllesskabsbistand til genopbygning, udvikling og stabilisering (Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation) den centrale myndighed for offentlig finansiering og kontrakter (Central Finance and Contracting Unit) Europa-Kommissionens bistandsmission p politiomrdet Det Europžiske Genopbygningsagentur Generaldirektoratet for Udvidelse Den Europžiske Union Den europžiske mission for bistand til det albanske retssystem De Forenede Nationer Forbundsrepublikken Jugoslavien Flerrigt vejledende program Hovedsžde Instrument til fżrtiltrždelsesbistand Den NATO-ledede Kosovo-Force Landestrategidokument Organisationen for Sikkerhed og Samarbejde i Europa Generaldirektoratet for Eksterne Forbindelser Resultatorienteret kontrol Stabiliserings-og associeringsprocessen De Forenede Nationers mission i Kosovo (United Nations Mission in Kosovo) 
27.11.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 285/3 ADF BiH CARDS CFCU CSP DG ELARG DG RELEX EAR EC ECPA EU EURALIUS FRY FYROM HQ IPA KFOR MIP OSCE OVI ROM SAI SAp SR UN UNMIK WB ABBREVIATIONS Albanian Development Fund Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation Central Finance and Contracting Unit Country Strategy Paper Directorate-General for Enlargement Directorate-General for External Relations European Agency for Reconstruction European Commission EC Police Assistance mission in Albania European Union European Assistance Mission to the Albanian Justice System Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Headquarter Instrument for Pre-Accession NATO led Kosovo Force Multiannual Indicative Programme Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe Objectively Verifiable Indicators Result Oriented Monitoring Supreme Audit Institution Stabilisation and Association process Special Report of the European Court of Auditors United Nations United Nations Mission in Kosovo World Bank
C 285/4 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende RESUM I. Hovedmlene for programmet for fžllesskabsbistand til genopbygning, udvikling og stabilisering, CARDS-programmet, er at bidrage til de bistandsberettigedes deltagelse i stabiliserings-og associeringsprocessen (SAP) og at udvide den vestlige Balkanregions landes og instansers ansvar med hensyn til denne proces. 
C 285/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. The main objectives of the ÔCommunity Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and StabilisationŐ (CARDS) programme are to contribute to the recipientsŐ participation in the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAp) and to increase the responsibility of the western Balkan countries and entities in relation to that process.
CARDS-programmet blev udformet, s det tilskynder til bžredygtige og EU-kompatible reformer, konsoliderer stabiliteten og tilnžrmer regionen til Den Europžiske Union. 
CARDS was designed to encourage sustainable and EU compatible reform, consolidate stability and to bring the region closer to the European Union.
I perioden 2000-2006 var programmets budgettildeling p over 5 000 millioner euro (jf. punkt 1-7). 
For the period of 2000 to 2006 the programme has had a budget allocation of more than 5 000 million euro (see paragraphs 1 to 7).
Retten reviderede CARDS-programmet for at n frem til konklusioner om effektiviteten af Kommissionens forvaltning. 
The Court audited the CARDS programme to conclude on the effectiveness of the CommissionŐs management.
Det gjorde den ved (jf. punkt 8) at vurdere: a) om den strategiske vejledning vedrżrende programmerne var relevant og konsekvent b) om de forvaltningstilgange, som Kommissionen havde etableret og anvendte, var velegnede og produktive c) om de finansierede projekter fremmede modtagerlandenes ejerskab d) om overvgningen og evalueringen var effektive til identificering af svagheder og spredning af information, og om Kommissionens opfżlgning var veltimet. 
This was done by assessing (see paragraph 8): (a) whether the strategic guidance directing the programme was appropriate and coherent; (b) whether the management approaches established and used by the Commission were appropriate and efficient; (c) whether projects financed by the programme encouraged recipient country ownership; and (d) whether monitoring and evaluation were effective in identifying weaknesses and disseminating their findings, and the subsequent action taken by the Commission was timely.
Kommissionens strategiske vejledning var meget generel. 
The CommissionŐs strategic guidance was very general.
Landestrategidokumenterne fungerede ikke godt nok som vejledning, isžr fordi de ikke byggede p veltimede sektorspecifikke strategier. 
The country strategy papers did not provide sufficient orientation, particularly as they were not supported by timely sectoral strategies.
I de flerrige vejledende programmer var der ikke foretaget en prioritering af eller inden for de forskellige interventionsomrder. 
The multi-annual indicative programmes did not prioritise between or within the different areas of intervention.
De europžiske partnerskaber, der blev indfżrt i 2004, blev ikke brugt til at forbedre vejledningen i udvžlgelse af foranstaltninger (jf. punkt 11-27). 
The European partnerships introduced in 2004 were not used to improve guidance for selection of actions (see paragraphs 11 to 27).
Tidligere har EU-bistanden til den vestlige Balkanregion vžret hžmmet af, at dens retsgrundlag var tre forskellige forordninger, at programmerne blev gennemfżrt langsomt, og at centraliseringen i Bruxelles var for stžrk. 
In the past the EU assistance to the western Balkans suffered from the co-existence of three different legal bases, slow implementation of programmes and excessive centralisation.
CARDS-forordningen samlede retsgrundlaget. 
The CARDS Regulation unified the legal bases.
Kommissionen havde ogs gode resultater med at sikre, at bistanden blev ydet hurtigt, selv om der undertiden ikke blev taget tilstržkkeligt hensyn til modtagerlandenes kapacitet til at udnytte bistanden. 
The Commission was also successful in ensuring that aid was delivered quickly although this was sometimes at the expense of the capacity of the recipient countries to benefit from the aid.
Kommissionen brugte fire forskellige forvaltningstilgange. 
The Commission used four different management approaches.
De to vžsentligste tilgange Ń dekoncentreret forvaltning i delegationerne og forvaltning i Det Europžiske Genopbygningsagentur (EGA) Ń var overvejende effektive og hensigtsmžssige (jf. punkt 28-41). 
The two main approaches Ń devolved Delegations and the European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) Ń were mostly effective and appropriate (see paragraphs 28 to 41).
V. Kommissionen prioriterede en udvidelse af modtagerlandenes ejerskab hżjt, men alligevel blev der ikke brugt en konsekvent tilgang for at n dette ml, og de forvaltningstilgange, der blev brugt, fremmede ikke et sdant ejerskab (jf. punkt 42-54). 
V. While recipient country ownership was considered a priority by the Commission, there was no consistent approach to achieving this aim and the management approaches used did not encourage such ownership (see paragraphs 42 to 54).
Overvgningen og evalueringen fungerede til en vis grad godt, men delegationerne og EGA havde forskellige procedurer. 
Monitoring and evaluation was good in parts, but inconsistencies exist between the Delegations and the EAR.
Det gjorde overvgningen mindre effektiv, at der ikke var opstillet hensigtsmžssige pro-jektindikatorer (jf. punkt 55-60). 
An absence of adequate project indicators compromised the effectiveness of monitoring (see paragraphs 55 to 60).
Rettens konklusion er, at Kommissionens forvaltning af CARDS-programmet i det store og hele bidrog positivt til stabiliseringen og genopbygningen i modtagerlandene. 
The Court concludes that the CommissionŐs management of the CARDS programme was largely successful in contributing to stabilisation and reconstruction in the recipient countries.
Bistanden var dog mindre effektiv, nr det gjaldt om at forbedre den administrative kapacitet, fordi den i begyndelsen kun i ringe grad blev koncentreret om institutionsopbygning, og modtagerlandene ikke havde kapacitet nok til at absorbere den bistand, der blev ydet (jf. punkt 61-70). 
However, the aid was less effective in improving administrative capacities, due to an initially low concentration on institution building and insufficient recipient country capacity to absorb the assistance provided (see paragraphs 61 to 70).
CARDS-forordningen blev anvendt indtil 2006, og det nye instrument til fżrtiltrždelsesbistand trdte i kraft i 2007. 
The CARDS Regulation came to an end in 2006 and the new Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance came into effect in 2007.
Retten anbefaler, at Kommissionen: forbedrer sin strategiske vejledning, sikrer, at implemente-ringstempoet sžttes under fuld hensyntagen til modtagernes kapacitet til at absorbere bistanden, etablerer en effektiv strategi til sikring af modtagerlandenes ejerskab og udbygger den bedste praksis i overvgning og evaluering (jf. punkt 61-70). 27.11.2007 
The Court recommends that the Commission: improves its strategic guidance; ensures that implementation speed takes full account of beneficiariesŐ ability to absorb the assistance; establishes an effective strategy for ensuring recipient country ownership; and extends best practice in monitoring and evaluation (see paragraphs 61 to 70). 27.11.2007
27.11.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 285/5 INDLEDNING 1. 
27.11.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 285/5 INTRODUCTION 1.