natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
De fżrste aktioner blev tilpasset for at sikre, at hjžlpen var relevant . . . . . . . . . . . . Forsinkelser, som skyldes manglende kapacitet og andre udefrakommende hindrin-ger............................................................... 
Good coordination between DG ECHO and other Commission services except for immediateresponse ................................................. Role of monitoring systems in ensuring relevance, timeliness and efficiency of implemen-tation.................................................................
I-IX 1-7 1-3 4-5 6-7 8-11 8 9-10 11 12-44 12-21 12-15 16-17 18 19-21 22-26 22-23 24-26 27-39 27-33 34 35 36-39 Punkt Side 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 9 10 10 10 11 11 12 13 13 
I-IX 1-7 1-3 4-5 6-7 8-11 8 9-10 11 12-44 12-21 12-15 16-17 18 19-21 22-26 22-23 24-26 27-39 27-33 34 35 36-39 Paragraphs Page 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 9 10 10 10 11 11 12 13 13
C 170/2 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 21.7.2006 Blev resultaterne net, og var projekterne tilstržkkeligt bžredygtige? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Det hżje bistandsniveau var med til at gżre projekterne bžredygtige . . . . . . . . . . . 
C 170/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 21.7.2006 Achievementofresultsandadequacyofsustainability ........................... Adequatesustainabilityfavouredbyhighleveloffunding ....................
KONKLUSION ............................................................. 
CONCLUSIONS ............................................................
ANBEFALINGER ............................................................ Punkt Side 40-44 14 Projekterne har bidraget til en generelt positiv reaktion, selv om output og resultater inogletilfžldeikkeopfyldteforventningerne ............................. 
RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................... Paragraphs Page 40-44 14 Projects contributed to a successful overall response though some outputs and results werelessthanplanned ...............................................
40-43 14 44 15 45-49 16 50-54 17 BILAG:Kortoverfżlgerneaftsunamien ..................................................... 
40-43 14 44 15 45-49 16 50-54 17 ANNEX:Mapofimpactoftsunami ........................................................
18 Kommissionenssvar................................................................... 
18 CommissionŐsreplies ..................................................................
19 BRR DIPECHO ECHO EU FAFA FN GAM GD ECHO HIC IDP LRRD LTTE MIC ngoŐer RAP TEC UNDAC UNOCHA FORKORTELSER Badan Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi Disaster preparedness in ECHO (katastrofeberedskab i ECHO) Det Europžiske Fžllesskabs Kontor for Humanitžr Bistand Den Europžiske Union Finansiel og administrativ rammeaftale De Forenede Nationer Acehs befrielsesbevžgelse Generaldirektoratet for Humanitžr Bistand Humanitarian Information Centre (center for oplysninger om humanitžre aktioner) Internt fordrevne Sammenkobling af nżdhjžlp, rehabilitering og udvikling De Tamilske Tigres Befrielsesfront Monitorerings-og informationscenter Ikke-statslige organisationer Rammeaftale om partnerskab Tsunami Evaluation Coalition FNŐs katastrofebedżmmelse og -koordinering FNŐs Kontor for Koordinering af Humanitžre Anliggender 
19 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BRR Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Office DG ECHO Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid DIPECHO Disaster preparedness in DG ECHO ECHO European Community Humanitarian Aid Office EU European Union (EU) FAFA Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement FPA Framework Partnership Agreement GAM Free Aceh Movement HIC Humanitarian Information Centre IDP Internally displaced person LRRD Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development LTTE Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam MIC Monitoring and Information Centre NGOs Non-governmental organisations TEC Tsunami Evaluation Coalition UN United Nations UNDAC United Nations Disaster Assessment and Coordination UNOCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
21.7.2006 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende RESUM I. Den 26. december 2004 udlżste et jordskžlv ud for det nordlige Sumatras vestkyst en gigantisk tsunami (flodbżlge), der fżrte til omfattende żdelžggelser i mange lande i Det Indiske Ocean og kostede over 200 000 mennesker livet. 
21.7.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. On 26 December 2004, an earthquake off the west coast of Northern Sumatra triggered a massive tsunami causing widespread destruction in many countries of the Indian Ocean, killing over 200 000 people.
Det internationale samfund reagerede med overvžldende generżsitet og ydede over 5 milliarder euro i humanitžr bistand (jf. punkt 1-3). 
The international community responded generously with over 5 billion euro of humanitarian aid (see paragraphs 1 to 3).
Europa-Kommissionen har et sžrligt generaldirektorat, Generaldirektoratet for Humanitžr Bistand (ECHO), som forvalter den bistand, Fžllesskabet yder i forbindelse med humanitžre kriser. 
The European Commission has a specific Directorate-General, Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid (DG ECHO), to respond to humanitarian crises.
ECHO gennemfżrer ikke selv nżdhjžlpsaktionerne, men overlader gennemfżrelsen af aktionerne til sine partnere, som er ngoŐer og internationale organisationer, ssom De Forenede Nationer og Rżde Kors. 
DG ECHO does not implement relief activities directly, but through partners which consist of NGOs and international organisations, including the United Nations and Red Cross.
ECHO ydede 123 millioner euro i humanitžr bistand efter tsunamien (jf. punkt 4-6). 
Following the tsunami, DG ECHO granted funding of 123 million euro of humanitarian aid (see paragraphs 4 to 6).
Retten reviderede den humanitžre bistand, Kommissionen har ydet efter tsunamien. Retten gennemgik dokumentation, foretog interview og besżg p stedet og gennemgik andre revisioner og evalueringer. 
On the basis of an examination of documentation, interviews, on-the-spot visits and a review of other audits and evaluations, the CourtŐs audit examined the CommissionŐs humanitarian aid response to the tsunami.
Bistanden efter tsunamien omfattede i overensstemmelse med ECHOŐs mandat katastrofebistand og en ržkke kortsigtede rehabiliteringsarbejder, men ikke genopbygning p lang sigt. 
This included the emergency response and some short-term rehabilitation work consistent with DG ECHOŐs mandate, but did not include longer term reconstruction.
Samme dag, som katastrofen indtraf, blev der ydet 3 millioner euro, og inden for de fżlgende fem dage blev der ydet yderligere 20 millioner euro. 
Commission procedures enabled a rapid response to the tsunami, granting 3 million euro the same day as the disaster, followed by a further 20 million euro within five days.
I februar 2005 blev der bevilget yderligere 80 millioner euro, som blev efterfulgt af 20 millioner euro i december 2005, hvorved den samlede bistand kom op p 123 millioner euro. 
An additional 80 million euro was granted in February 2005, followed by 20 million euro in December 2005, making a total of 123 million euro.
Den store stżtte viste sig at vžre berettiget, navnlig fordi overgangen mellem nżdhjžlpsfasen og genopbygningsfasen blev lžngere end forventet (jf. punkt 12-15). 
The high level of funding proved appropriate particularly due to the longer than expected transition from the relief phase to the reconstruction phase (see paragraphs 12 to 15).
V. ECHO havde arbejdet i Sri Lanka inden tsunamien med projekter til fordel for den borgerkrigsramte befolkning. 
V. DG ECHO had been working in Sri Lanka prior to the tsunami on projects with the conflict affected population.
Efter tsunamien valgte ECHO at arbejde med eksisterende partnere i Sri Lanka, som havde et godt kendskab til forholdene i omrdet. P denne mde kunne ECHO finansiere relevante projekter trods overfloden af finansielle midler og projekter, der skyldtes, at der var ankommet en lang ržkke nye ngoŐer til omrdet. 
Following the tsunami, DG ECHO chose to work with existing partners in Sri Lanka who knew the situation well, enabling it to fund relevant projects in spite of the situation of over-funding and overcrowding caused by the large number of newly arrived NGOs. In Aceh DG ECHO did not have a presence in the field before the tsunami.
De projektforslag, der blev indsendt fra og med februar 2005, var baseret p mere plidelige behovsanalyser (jf. punkt 16-21). 
Later project proposals from February 2005 onwards were based on more reliable needs assessments (see paragraphs 16 to 21).
De Forenede Nationer fungerede som koordinator, og ECHO stżttede dette arbejde med finansielle midler til projekter, der skulle lżse problemerne med, at der ikke var plidelige og nżjagtige behovsanalyser. 
DG ECHO supported the coordination role of the United Nations and provided funding to address the lack of reliable and accurate information on needs.
De mange nyankomne humanitžre organisationer, som ofte havde store belżb i private midler, gjorde koordineringen endnu vanskeligere med det resultat, at omfanget og kvaliteten af den ydede bistand varierede. 
The arrival of a large number of humanitarian organisations, often with large amounts of private funding, added to the difficulties of coordination resulting in variations in the level and quality of aid provided.
Koordineringen med andre kommissionstjenester har vžret god, og det er lykkedes at sikre en gnidningslżs overgang fra kortsigtet nżdhjžlp til genopbygning p lang sigt. 
Regarding coordination with other Commission services, there has been good coordination to ensure a smooth link between short-term relief efforts and longer term reconstruction.
Koordineringen mellem ECHO og civilbeskyttelsesordningen, som hżrer under Generaldirektoratet for Miljż, og som er ansvarlig for at koordinere den assistance inden for civilbeskyttelse, som medlemsstaterne yder, var imidlertid problematisk bde i Indonesien og Sri Lanka (jf. punkt 22-26). 
However, in both Indonesia and Sri Lanka coordination between DG ECHO and the Civil Protection Mechanism, based in the Directorate-General Environment and responsible for the coordination of Member StatesŐ civil protection assistance, was problematic (see paragraphs 22 to 26).
C 170/4 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 21.7.2006 VII. 
C 170/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 21.7.2006 VII.
ECHOŐs system til overvgning og kontrol af projekter omfatter kontrolbesżg foretaget af eksperter p stedet og de landeansvarlige, partnernes rapporter, besżg som ECHOŐs Kontor for Finansielle Spżrgsml og Revision foretager p stedet, kontrol inden afholdelsen af den endelige betaling og efterfżlgende ekstern kontrol. 
DG ECHOŐs system for monitoring and controlling projects consists of monitoring visits of field experts and desk officers, reports of partners, on-the-spot visits of the DG ECHO Finances and Audit Unit, checks prior to final payment and later external audits.
Procedurerne har generelt gjort det muligt at žndre projekterne, s de kunne opfylde nye behov. 
Procedures generally enabled projects to be modified to meet evolving needs.
Der er imidlertid behov for bedre sammenlignende oplysninger om omkostningerne, der bżr gives mere detaljerede oplysninger om partnernes organisatoriske ordninger, og der bżr sžttes tal p mlopfyldelsen for projekternes output (jf. punkt 27-39). 
However, there is scope to develop comparative cost information, to provide more details on organisational arrangements and to quantify the achievement of project outputs (see paragraphs 27 to 39).
De projekter, Kommissionen har finansieret, er blevet implementeret, men i nogle tilfžlde har inflation og problemer med at fremskaffe varer og rekruttere kvalificeret personale bevirket, at projekterne ikke har givet det forventede output. 
Projects funded by the Commission have been implemented, though in some cases project outputs have been less than planned due to inflation and difficulties in obtaining goods and recruiting qualified staff.
De projekter, der blev forvaltet af ECHOŐs partnere, har bidraget til at džkke befolkningens basale behov for husly, mad, vand og sanitet, sundhed, psykosocial bistand, bżrne-og familiepleje og telekommunikation. 
Projects managed by DG ECHO partners contributed to covering the basic needs of the population in terms of shelter, food, water and sanitation, health, psychosocial support, child and family care and telecommunications.
Kommissionen finansierer ogs projekter, som har til forml at udbygge katastrofeberedskabet. 
The Commission is also financing projects to support disaster preparedness.
Revisionen bekržftede resultaterne af andre evalueringer, som konkluderede, at nżdhjžlpsindsatsen var effektiv, selv om den var drligt koordineret. 
The audit work confirmed the findings of other evaluations that the relief effort was effective, though poorly coordinated.
Den hżje stżtte gjorde det muligt for ECHO at sikre džkning i overgangsfasen mellem nżdhjžlp og rehabilitering, der blev lžngere end forventet, og at ivžrksžtte aktioner af hżj kvalitet og finansiere rehabiliteringsprojekter med fokus p udvikling. 
The high level of funding enabled DG ECHO to bridge the longer than expected transitional phase between relief and rehabilitation through quality interventions and to fund rehabilitation projects with a development orientation.
I nogle tilfžlde nede Kommissionens projekter imidlertid ikke ud til s mange stżttemodtagere som planlagt, primžrt fordi behovsanalyserne var unżjagtige. 
However, in terms of beneficiaries reached, the success of Commission projects was sometimes less than initially planned, mainly due to inaccurate needs assessments.
Det var navnlig tilfžldet i forbindelse med vand-og sanitetskomponenten i et FN-agenturs projekt i Aceh, der kun nede ud til 100 000 mennesker, dvs. kun 5 % af de oprindeligt forventede 2 millioner stżttemodtagere (jf. punkt 40-44). 
In particular, the water and sanitation component of a UN agency project in Aceh reached 100 000 people, representing only 5 % of the originally planned 2 million beneficiaries (see paragraphs 40 to 44).
21.7.2006 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 170/5 INDLEDNING Tsunamien den 26. december 2004 1. 
21.7.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 170/5 INTRODUCTION The tsunami of 26 December 2004 1.
Den 26. december 2004 udlżste et jordskžlv ud for det nordlige Sumatras vestkyst en gigantisk tsunami (flodbżlge), der fżrte til omfattende żdelžggelser i mange lande i Det Indiske Ocean og kostede over 200 000 mennesker livet. 
On 26 December 2004, an earthquake off the west coast of Northern Sumatra triggered a massive tsunami causing widespread destruction in many countries of the Indian Ocean, killing over 200 000 people.
Den indonesiske Aceh-provins oplevede de vžrste żdelžggelser med over 160 000 omkomne eller savnede og over en halv million fordrevne. 
The Indonesian province of Aceh suffered the worst of the devastation where over 160 000 people were dead or missing and over half a million were displaced.
I Sri Lanka, som er det land, der blev nžsthrdest ramt, var der omkring 35 000 omkomne eller savnede og en halv million fordrevne. 
In Sri Lanka, the second worst affected country, some 35 000 people were dead or missing and half a million were displaced.
Kortet i bilaget giver et overblik over fżlgerne af tsunamien. 
The map in the Annex summarises the impact of the tsunami.
Regeringer og enkeltpersoner reagerede med overvžldende generżsitet. 
Governments and individuals responded with overwhelming generosity.
I januar 2006 var der i alt ydet ca. 5,1 milliarder euro i humanitžr bistand som fżlge af tsunamien, hvoraf 3,4 milliarder euro (67 %) kom fra private donorer (1). 
By January 2006, the global level of humanitarian assistance in response to the tsunami had reached some 5,1 billion euro, of which 3,4 billion euro (67 %) came from private donors (1).
Hvis man medregner langsigtet genopbygningshjžlp, er der i alt givet tilsagn om over 11 milliarder euro (2). 
Including the longer-term reconstruction aid, a total of over 11 billion euro has been pledged (2).
Tsunamien ramte bde Aceh og Sri Lanka p et tidspunkt, hvor der havde vžret langvarige konflikter mellem regeringen og separatistorganisationer. 
The tsunami hit both Aceh and Sri Lanka against a background of long-standing conflicts between the Government and separatist organisations.
I Aceh havde en 30 r lang konflikt mellem den indonesiske regering og Acehs Befrielsesbevžgelse (GAM) kostet 15 000 mennesker livet. 
In Aceh a 30-year conflict between the Government of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) had claimed 15 000 lives.
I Sri Lanka har en borger-krig mellem regeringen og De Tamilske Tigres Befrielsesfront (LTTE) hžrget siden 1983 med enkelte afbrydelser og kostet 60000 mennesker livet. 
In Sri Lanka there has been on-and-off civil war between the Government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) since 1983 leaving 60 000 people dead.
Efter tre rs vbenstilstand, hvor 400 000 er vendt tilbage til det sted, de kom fra, skżnnes det, at der fortsat er 400 000 fordrevne. 
After three years of ceasefire and the return of 400 000 people to their places of origin, there are still an estimated 400 000 cases of displacement.
Generaldirektoratet for Humanitžr Bistand (ECHO) 4. 
Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid (DG ECHO) 4.
Europa-Kommissionen har et sžrligt generaldirektorat, ECHO, som forvalter den bistand, Fžllesskabet yder i forbindelse med humanitžre kriser. 
The European Commission has a specific Directorate-General, DG ECHO, to respond to humanitarian crises.
ECHOŐs mandat beskrives i Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 1257/96 af 20. juni 1996 om humanitžr bistand (3) og omfatter foranstaltninger, der gr ud p at beskytte og redde menneskeliv i katastrofesituationer, at gennemfżre kortsigtet genopretningsarbejde, at yde bistand til de ramte befolkninger, s de kan blive selvforsynende under hensyntagen til udviklingsmlene p lang sigt, nr det er muligt, og at indfżre et beredskab over for risici for naturkatastrofer. 
DG ECHOŐs mandate is described in Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning humanitarian aid (3) and includes saving and preserving life during emergencies, carrying out short-term rehabilitation work, helping those affected gain a level of self-sufficiency, taking long-term development objectives into account where possible and ensuring preparedness for risks of natural disasters.
P rsbasis yder EU i gennemsnit ca. 600 millioner euro i humanitžr bistand. 
Average annual EU humanitarian aid funding is in the order of 600 million euro.
1257/96 om humanitžr bistand kan Kommissionen selv gennemfżre nżdhjžlpsaktioner, men i praksis overlader ECHO gennemfżrelsen af (1) Kilde: UN Financial Tracking Service. 
Although Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 allows for the direct implementation of relief activities by the Commission, in practice DG ECHO entrusts the implementation (1) Source: UN Financial Tracking Service.
(2) Kilde: FNŐs sžrlige udsending til tsunamikatastrofen (UN Office of the Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery). 
(2) Source: UN Office of the Special Envoy for Tsunami Recovery.
(3) EFT L 163 af 2.7.1996, s. 
(3) OJ L 163, 2.7.1996, p.
1. bistandsforanstaltningerne til sine partnere, som er ikke-statslige organisationer (ngoŐer) og internationale organisationer (ssom Den Internationale Rżde Kors Komit, Den Internationale Organisation for Migration og De Forenede Nationers (FN) organisationer). 
1. of aid to its partners which consist of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and international organisations (e.g. International Committee of the Red Cross, International Organisation for Migration and United Nations (UN) organisations).
Arbejdsopgaver og ansvarsomrder, som tildeles de ngoŐer og internationale organisationer (ud over FN), der er blevet vurderet som egnede partnere, defineres i rammeaftaler om partnerskab (RAP). 
The roles and responsibilities of NGOs and international organisations (other than UN) which have been assessed as suitable partners are defined in Framework Partnership Agreements (FPAs).
Den overordnede retlige ramme for forbindelserne mellem ECHO og FN-organisationerne er defineret i en finansiel og administrativ rammeaftale (FAFA). 
The general legal framework for relations between DG ECHO and UN organisations is defined in the Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement (FAFA).
Andre kommissionsinstrumenter, der blev taget i brug i forbindelse med tsunamien 6. 
Other Commission instruments involved in the response to the tsunami 6.
Som supplement til ECHOŐs interventioner blev der ogs taget andre kommissionsinstrumenter i brug i forbindelse med tsunamien, herunder civilbeskyttelsesordningen, som blev anvendt i krisens indledende fase. Civilbeskyttelsesordningen blev oprettet ved Rdets beslutning 2001/792/EF af 23. oktober 2001 (4) og hżrer under GD for Miljż. 
Complementing DG ECHO interventions, other Commission instruments were involved in the response to the tsunami, including, at the initial stage, the Civil Protection Mechanism, set up by Council Decision 2001/792/EC of 23 October 2001 (4) and based in DG Environment.
Via sit monitorerings-og informationscentrer (MIC) udpegede civilbeskyttelsesordningen eksperthold og sendte dem til de tsunamiramte omrder, hvor de skulle hjžlpe med at vurdere situationen og koordinere modtagelsen og fordelingen af den civilbeskyttelsesbistand, som medlemsstaterne havde ydet. 
Through its Monitoring and Information Centre (MIC) the Civil Protection Mechanism appointed teams of experts and sent them to the tsunami affected region to help assess the situation and coordinate the arrival and distribution of civil protection assistance offered by Member States.
Langsigtet rehabilitering, genopbygning og genrejsning henhżrer under Generaldirektoratet for Eksterne Forbindelser (RELEX) og Samarbejdskontoret EuropeAid (AIDCO), mens ECHO er ansvarlig for humanitžr bistand i form af katastrofenżdhjžlp og kortsigtet rehabilitering. 
Longer term rehabilitation, reconstruction and recovery are under the responsibility of the Directorates-General for External Relations (RELEX) and European Aid (AIDCO), whilst DG ECHO is responsible for the humanitarian response consisting of emergency relief and short-term rehabilitation.
Grzonen mellem kortsigtet nżdhjžlp og udvikling p lžngere sigt udfyldes ved hjžlp af en proces, der sammenkobler nżdhjžlp, rehabilitering og udvikling (LRRD) (5). 
The grey area between short-term relief and longer term development is addressed by the process of linking relief, rehabilitation and development (LRRD) (5).
Den hurtige reaktionsmekanisme, som blev oprettet ved Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 381/2001 af 26. februar 2001 (6), og som hżrer under RELEX, skal fremme denne proces ved at sžtte Kommissionen i stand til at handle hurtigt og smidigt i tilfžlde af krisesituationer og dermed bidrage til at skabe betingelserne for udvikling p lang sigt. 
The Rapid Reaction Mechanism, set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 381/2001 of 26 February 2001 (6) and based in DG RELEX, is designed to assist in this process by allowing the Commission to respond, in a rapid and flexible manner to crises, by helping to create the conditions under which longer term development can be pursued.
RETTENS REVISION Revisionens baggrund 8. 
THE COURTŐS AUDIT Reasons to carry out the audit 8.
I betragtning af de betydelige midler, som svel institutioner som enkeltpersoner har ydet som reaktion p tsunamien, og som fżlge af Europa-Parlamentets og Rdets interesse, besluttede Retten at revidere EUŐs humanitžre indsats. 
In view of the high level of funding by institutions and individuals in the response to the tsunami, and given the interest shown by the European Parliament and the Council, the Court decided to audit the EU humanitarian response.
(4) EFT L 297 af 15.11.2001, s. 
(4) OJ L 297, 15.11.2001, p.
(5) Meddelelse fra Kommissionen om sammenkobling af nżdhjžlp, rehabilitering og udvikling (LRRD) (KOM(96) 153) og om sammenkobling af nżdhjžlp, rehabilitering og udvikling Ń en vurdering (KOM(2001) 153). 
(5) Commission Communication COM(96) 153 on Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development (LRRD) and COM(2001) 153 on Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development Ń An assessment.