natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tekstboks 7 Vurdering af virkningerne p miljżet i forbindelse med stżrre infrastrukturprojekter og mineprojekter I feasibilityundersżgelsen vedrżrende rehabilitering og opgradering af Mwanza Border-Tinte og Isaka-Nzga-vejene i Tanzania (ottende EUF, 85 millioner euro) fyldte det, der i finansieringsforslaget blev kaldt en VVM, kun en side. 
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/13 Box 7 Environmental impact assessments for large infrastructure and mining projects In Tanzania, for the rehabilitation and upgrading of the Mwanza Border-Tinte and Isaka-Nzga Roads (eighth EDF, 85 million euro), what the Financing Proposal termed an EIA amounted to only one page in the feasibility study.
I forbindelse med et Sysmin-projekt i Botswana (ottende EUF, 30 millioner euro), som ydede bistand til at forlžnge kobber/nikkelminen i Selebi Phikwes levetid, var der ikke foretaget en VVM, og der var ikke taget skridt til straks at imżdeg den alvorlige risiko, der var for, at džmningen til tilbageholdelse af affald fra minen ville bryde sammen eller til at nedbringe det uacceptalt hżje niveau for udledning af svovl-dioxid fra udskilningsovnen. 
In Botswana, no EIA was carried out on a Sysmin project (eighth EDF, 30 million euro) which provided assistance to extend the life of the Selebi Phikwe copper/nickel mine without immediately addressing the serious risk of the collapse of tailings dam or the unacceptably high level of sulphur dioxide emissions from the smelter.
I forbindelse med et projekt til genbosžtning af flygtninge i Guatemala (12 millioner euro) var der ikke udfżrt en VVM, selv om gen-bosžtningsprojekter a priori m betragtes som potentielt havende vžsentlig indvirkning p miljżet. 
In Guatemala, no EIA was carried out for a project to resettle refugees (12 million euro) although resettlement projects can be considered a priori to have a potentially significant environmental impact.
Genbosžtningerne medfżrte betydelig skade p de lokale żkosystemer. 
The resettlements caused significant damage to local ecosystems.
Nr der ses bort fra stżrre infrastruktur-, landbrugs-og mineprojekter, hvor det er en nżdvendighed, at der udfżres en VVM, er der mange andre typer af projekter, hvor det ville vžre żnskeligt eller endog af afgżrende betydning, at der udfżres en VVM. 
Apart from large infrastructure, agricultural and mining projects, where an EIA is a necessity, there are many other kinds of projects where an EIA would be desirable or even essential.
Men uden klare retningslinjer eller bestemmelser om, i forbindelse med hvilke projekter der skal foretages en VVM, var der betydelig risiko for, at der ikke ville blive foretaget en VVM, heller ikke selv om det burde vžre sket. 
However, without clear guidelines or requirements on which projects should be subject to an EIA, there was a considerable risk that EIAs would not be carried out even when they should have been.
Kommissionen har ikke noget centralt register over de VVM, der er udfżrt i forbindelse med udviklingsprojekter finansieret af Kommissionen. 
The Commission has no central register of ElAs carried out for development projects funded by the Commission.
Dette er en mangel i de interne ledel-sesoplysninger. 
This is a weakness in internal management information.
Et sdant register ville ogs lette offentlighedens adgang til sdanne oplysninger. 
Such a register would also facilitate the publicŐs access to this information.
EN VURDERING AF MILJŻPROJEKTERNES EFFEKTIVITET OG DE FAKTORER, SOM INDVIRKER P EFFEKTIVITETEN Indledning 47. 
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENVIRONMENT PROJECTS AND FACTORS INFLUENCING EFFECTIVENESS Introduction 47.
Udover de foranstaltninger, der er ivžrksat med henblik p at integrere miljżet i udviklingssamarbejdet, og som blev gennemget i den foregende del af denne beretning, har Kommissionen ogs sżgt at takle miljżspżrgsml ved at finansiere programmer og projekter p miljżomrdet. 
In addition to measures to mainstream the environment into development cooperation, examined in the previous section, the Commission has also sought to address environmental issues by financing programmes and projects in the environment sector.
P trods af at miljżet ikke var et af de prioriterede indsatsomrder i udviklingspolitikken fra 2000 (jf. punkt 9), og der kun er indget relativt f forpligtelser p dette omrde i forhold til den samlede bistand, (jf. tabel) har Kommissionen hele tiden vžret aktiv p dette omrde og vil kunne blive det endnu mere med vedtagelsen af den nye udviklingspolitik, hvor miljż og naturressourcer vil blive et af de prioriterede indsatsomrder (jf. punkt 12). 
Despite the fact that the sector was not a priority field in the 2000 development policy (see paragraph 9) and commitments in this area as a proportion of total aid funding has been relatively low (see Table), the Commission has remained active in this field and may become more so with the adoption of the new development policy where environment and natural resources will be a priority field (see paragraph 12).
Som led i revisionen sżgte Retten at: a) vurdere effektiviteten af de miljżprojekter, som Kommissionen finansierer b) kortlžgge de centrale faktorer, som indvirker p effektiviteten. Vurdering af projekternes effektivitet 48. 
The audit sought to: (a) assess the effectiveness of environment projects funded by the Commission; (b) identify key factors influencing effectiveness.
Retten undersżgte 65 projekter svarende til forpligtelser for 560 millioner euro i 16 lande. 
The Court examined 65 projects representing commitments of 560 million euro in 16 countries.
Projekterne blev finansieret over det almindelige budget i perioden 1995-2005 og af syvende, Tekstboks 8 Vurdering af virkningerne p miljżet i forbindelse med andre typer af projekter For mindst fire af de projekter, der blev revideret i Stillehavet, ville det have vžret en fordel, hvis der var blevet udfżrt en VVM. 
The projects were financed from the General Budget over the period 1995 to 2005 Box 8 Environmental impact assessments for other kinds of projects In the Pacific, at least four of the projects audited would have benefited from an EIA.
For s vidt angr projektet Kiribati Seaweed Development (syvende og niende EUF, 2,8 millioner euro), kom tržet til de stżttepžle, der var nżdvendige for algeproduktionen, fra den omgivende vegetation, herunder mangrovetržer, som er af vžsentlig betydning for marine żkosyste-mer og kystbeskyttelse. 
For example, for the Kiribati Seaweed Development project (seventh and ninth EDFs, 2,8 million euro), wooden posts needed to support seaweed cultivation were cut from the surrounding vegetation, including mangrove trees, which are important to marine ecosystems and coastal protection.
En VVM kunne have identificeret disse problemer, fżr projektet blev sat i gang, og have fremsat anbefalinger til, hvordan de kunne lżses. 
An EIA could have identified such issues prior to the project and recommended how to tackle them.
I de tilfžlde, hvor der var blevet udfżrt en VVM og identificeret afbżdende foranstaltninger, var der ingen systemer til sikring af, at disse foranstaltninger blev indskrevet i en miljżle-delsesplan, som skulle gennemfżres i lżbet af projektet. 
Insofar as EIAs had been carried out and mitigating measures identified, there was no system to ensure that these measures had been laid down in an environment management plan to be implemented during the course of the project.
Og hvor det var relevant, var anbefalingerne fra VVM helller ikke systematisk blevet medtaget i de tekniske specifikationer til kontrakter om anlžgsarbejder. 
Nor was the inclusion of EIA recommendations, where appropriate, in the technical specifications of works contracts systematically allowed for.
I de tilfžlde, hvor anbefalingerne fra VVM indgik i kontrakten, var der ikke altid fastsat sanktioner i tilfžlde af manglende overholdelse af miljżkravene i kontrakten. 
Where EIA recommendations were included in the contract, penalties were not always attached to non-compliance with the environmental stipulations in the contract.
C 235/14 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 29.9.2006 ottende og niende EUF. 
C 235/14 EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.9.2006 and from the seventh, eighth and ninth EDFs.
Fżlgende to hovedtyper af projekter blev undersżgt: a) 30 af de undersżgte projekter svarende til ca. 15 % af de 560 millioner euro blev finansieret over sžrlige budgetposter, navnlig posten for miljż og skove (jf. punkt 10 og 34). 
Projects examined were of two main types: (a) 30 of the projects examined, representing approximately 15 % of the 560 million euro, were financed through specific environmental budget lines, notably the Environment and Forests budget line (see paragraphs 10 and 34).
De projekter, som blev stżttet over denne budgetpost, var relativt sm (typisk 1,0 til 2,5 millioner euro) og blev normalt gennemfżrt af ngoŐer efter en indkaldelse af projektforslag fra Kommissionen. 
Projects supported from this budget line were relatively small (typically 1,0 to 2,5 million euro) and generally implemented by NGOs following a call for project proposals from the Commission.
Midlerne blev tildelt p grundlag af, hvad Kommissionen vurderer som de bedste forslag. b) 34 af de undersżgte projekter svarende til ca. 80 % af de 560 millioner euro blev finansieret med bilateral bistand, som Kommissionen tildelte landene inden for rammerne af budgetposterne vedrżrende EUF og samarbejdet med Asien, Latinamerika og Middelhavslandene. 
These funds are allocated not on a country by country basis but according to what the Commission evaluates as the best proposals. (b) 34 of the projects examined, representing approximately 80 % of the 560 million euro, were financed from bilateral aid allocations made to countries by the Commission in the framework of the EDF and Asia, Latin America and Mediterranean cooperation budget lines.
Stżrrelsen af disse projekter var meget forskellig, men i gennemsnit var der tale om fra 10 til 15 millioner euro. 
The size of these projects varied considerably, but on average it was in the order of 10 to 15 million euro.
En af de undersżgte interventioner, et sektorstżtteprogram til behandling af spildevand i Mauritius (niende EUF, 29,8 millioner euro), var endvidere mere et budgetstżtteprogram end et traditionelt projekt. 
In addition, one intervention examined was a budgetary support programme rather than a traditional project, a sectoral policy support programme for wastewater treatment in Mauritius (ninth EDF, 29,8 million euro).
Det afspejler, at der kun i begržnset omfang anvendes sdanne programmer p miljżomrdet og til beskyttelse af naturressourcerne. 49. 
This reflects the limited use of such programmes in the environment and natural resources sector. Audit assessment of project effectiveness Chart 49.
Rettens generelle vurdering i forhold til hvert af disse fem kriterier vises i diagrammet herunder. 
The CourtŐs overall assessment for each of these five criteria is given in the chart below.
Bilag II er et detaljeret skema i henhold til disse fem kriterier, og i oversigten i bilag III gives en beskrivelse af projekternes effektivitet i de enkelte lande. 
A detailed table showing the CourtŐs assessment of each project according to these five criteria is given in Annex II and a narrative overview of project effectiveness by country is provided in Annex III.
Da revisionen blev foretaget, var alle projekterne ikke afsluttede, og da der endvidere mske fżrst vil kunne foretages en endelig bedżmmelse med hensyn til effekt og bžredygtighed lžnge efter projektets afslutning, skal denne vurdering kun betragtes som vejledende. 
Given that not all projects had been completed at the time of the audit and that definitive judgements on impact and sustainability may not be possible until well after the end of the project, the assessment is only to be considered as indicative.
29.9.2006 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 235/15 51. 
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/15 51.
Revisionen viste, at projekterne i nžsten alle tilfžlde om end i varierende grad var relevante i forhold til modtagerlandenes behov, og at de i mange tilfžlde ogs tog hensyn til de generelle bevaringsml, navnlig i relation til bevaring af skove og biodiversitet. 
The audit found that in virtually all cases projects were, to varying degrees, relevant to the needs of the beneficiary countries and frequently also addressed global conservation needs, particularly in relation to forest and biodiversity conservation.
Da der ikke var foretaget omfattende vurderinger af miljżet, var det ikke muligt at fastsl, om de finansierede projekter var de mest relevante i forhold til modtagernes behov. 
In the absence of comprehensive assessments of the environment it was not possible to establish whether projects funded were the most relevant to beneficiariesŐ needs.
Fra og med 2005 anvender Kommissionen imidlertid mere og mere systematisk landemiljżprofiler (jf. punkt 33), som skal sikre, at der foretages en fuldstžndig vurdering af miljżspżrgsml i hvert enkelt land, og den skullle dermed bedre blive i stand til at identificere de projekter, der skal prioriteres hżjest. 
However, the increasingly systematic use from 2005 onwards by the Commission of Country Environment Profiles (see paragraph 33), which are intended to provide a full assessment of environmental issues in each beneficiary country, should enable it to better identify the highest priority projects.
Ifżlge Rettens vurdering var de specificerede output for 63 % af projekternes vedkommende enten leveret, eller det var sandsynligt, at de ville blive det. 
According to the CourtŐs assessment in 63 % of projects outputs had been or were likely to be fully achieved.
I 37 % af tilfžldene var output delvist blevet leveret, eller det var sandsynligt, at en del af dem ville blive det inden for projektets tidsramme. 
In 37 % of cases outputs had been partially achieved, or were likely to be partially achieved within the project timeframe.
For 58 % af projekternes vedkommende var de fleste af resultaterne net, for 21 % af projekternes vedkommende var nogle af resultaterne net, og i de sidste 21 % af tilfžldene var nogle f af resultaterne net. 
In 58 % of projects most of the results had been achieved, in 21 % of projects some results had been achieved and in a further 21 % of cases few results had been achieved.
Det er klart, at resultaterne normalt ikke vil blive net, hvis output ikke er leveret. 
Clearly results will generally not be met if outputs have not been produced.
For 42 % af projekternes vedkommende vurderede Retten, at effekten var eller sandsynligvis vil blive middel eller hżj, mens effekten i 58 % af tilfžldene blev vurderet som vžrende lav. 
In 42 % of projects was the impact assessed as being, or likely to be, medium to high, while in 58 % of cases impact was assessed as low.
Effekt er altid et centralt spżrgsml, men for mange af de undersżgte miljżprojekter var det sžrlig vigtigt, eftersom de var udformet som pilot-eller demonstrationsprojekter, og det var meningen, at de skulle kopieres i andre regioner i modtagerlandet. 
While impact is always a key issue, it was particulary important issue for many environment projects examined, since they were designed as pilot or demonstration projects with a view to their then being replicated in other regions of the beneficiary country.
For 45 % af projekternes vedkommende vurderede Retten, at udsigterne for bžredygtighed var gode, og i 55 % af tilfžldene blev de bedżmt som vžrende begržnsede. 
In 45 % of projects were the prospects for sustainability considered to be good, while in 55 % of cases they were considered to be limited.
Finansiel levedygtighed er et sžrlig centralt aspekt i forbindelse med bžredygtighed, for s vidt som miljżprojekter i hżjere grad sžtter fokus p bevaring end p udvikling, og det derfor kan blive nżdvendigt, at modtagerlandene fortsžtter med at yde finansiel stżtte til bevaringsaktioner, nr donorbistanden er hżrt op, samtidig med at de m give afkald p en potentiel żkonomisk fortjeneste. 
Financial viability is a particularly key aspect of sustainability since, in so far as environment projects focus on conservation rather than development, they may require beneficiary countries to continue to provide financial support for conservation activities after the end of donor assistance while forgoing potential economic benefits.
Den generelle tendens, der kommer til udtryk i disse tal, er, at projekterne nžsten altid er relevante, men at de ikke altid leverer alle de planlagte output. 
The general trend that emerges from these figures is that, while projects are almost always relevant, they do not always produce all the planned outputs.
Lidt over halvdelen realiserer de planlagte resultater fuldt ud, og lidt under halvdelen har en vžsentlig effekt, der ržkker ud over projektet, og vil sandsynligvis vžre bžredygtige. 
A little more than half fully achieve the results planned and somewhat less than half have a significant impact beyond the project and are likely to be sustainable.
Eksemplet i tekstboks 10 illustrerer disse forskellige aspekter af projekteffektiviteten i relation til et af de stżrste af de projekter, Kommissionen finansierer. 
The example in Box 10 below illustrates these different aspects of project effectiveness in relation to one of the most important projects funded by the Commission.
Analyse af de faktorer, som indvirker p miljżprojekternes effektivitet 57. 
Analysis of factors affecting effectiveness of environment projects 57.
I denne del af beretningen kortlžgges de centrale faktorer, som har indvirket p projekternes effektivitet. 
This section of the report identifies key factors which have influenced the effectiveness of projects.
I og med at Kommissionens bistand er baseret p principppet om partnerskab med modtagerlandene, skyldes nogle af de konstaterede problemer Ń i hvert fald til dels Ń svagheder i modtagerlandene. 
Given that the CommissionŐs development aid is based on the principle of partnership with beneficiary countries, some of the problems identified resulted at least in part from weaknesses on the side of beneficiary country.
Tekstboks 10 En illustration af vurderingskriterierne Ń det regionale program for bevarelse og rationel udnyttelse af żkosystemerne i Centralafrikas skove (Ecofac) Siden 1992 har Kommissionen spillet en ledende rolle i forbindelse med ivžrksžttelsen af aktiviteter til bevarelse og bžredygtig udnyttelse af żkosystemerne i Centralafrikas skove, navnlig gennem det regionale program for bevarelse og rationel udnyttelse af żkosystemerne i Centralafrikas skove (Ecofac) (sjette, syvende, ottende og niende EUF, 72,45 millioner euro). 
Box 10 An illustration of the assessment criteria Ń the case of the regional programme for the conservation and development of the forestry Ecosystems of Central Africa (ECOFAC) Since 1992, the Commission has played a leading role in initiating activities for the conservation and sustainable use of the forestry ecosystems of Central Africa, mainly through the Regional Programme for the Conservation and Development of the Forestry Ecosystems of Central Africa (ECOFAC) programme (sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth EDFs; 72,45 million euro).
Programmet er yderst relevant, eftersom det er med til at bevare verdens nžststżrste sammenhžngende regnskovsomrde efter Amazonas til gavn for bevaringen af biodiversitet og forebyggelsen af klimažndringer globalt. 
The programme is highly relevant as it helps to preserve what is the second largest continuous expanse of rainforest after the Amazon for the global benefits of conserving biodiversity and preventing climate change.
Regionalt og nationalt er skoven en vigtig indtžgtskilde for landene i Centralafrika bde i form af industriel anvendelse af tżmmer og andre skovbrugsprodukter og vildtkżd. 
On a regional and national level the forest is an important source of revenue for Central AfricaŐs countries, both in terms of industrial exploitation of timber and non-timber forestry products and game meat.
Udtrykt i output har Ecofac-programmet finansieret en bred vifte af infrastrukturprojekter (adgangsveje, grusveje, broer, forskningscentre, modtagelsescentre, turistlejre, udsigtspunkter, lufthavne i bushen, udstyr til skovfogeder og personale) med henblik p forvaltning af bekyttede omrder. 
In terms of outputs, ECOFAC has put in place a wide range of infrastructure (access roads, tracks, bridges, research centres, reception centres, tourist camps, viewpoints, bush airports, equipment for forest-rangers and staff) for the management of protected areas.
Udtrykt i resultater har programmet skabt opmžrksomhed omkring behovet for bevarelse af żkosystemerne i skovene i Centralafrika og medvirket til oprettelse, udvikling og beskyttelse af store fredede omrder, som er af kritisk betydning for bevarelsen af regionens enestende biodiversitet. 
In terms of results, the programme has raised awareness of the need to conserve the forestry ecosystems of Central Africa, and contributed to the creation, development and safeguarding of important protected areas which are critical for the preservation of the unique biodiversity of the region.
Det har ogs gjort det muligt at udfżre en mžngde videnskabelig forskning. 
It has also enabled a large amount of scientific research to be carried out.
P den anden side har promoveringen af de beskyttede omrders natur-og kulturarv gennem udvikling af turisme vžret begržnset, hvilket skyldes flere faktorer (de hżje omkostninger forbundet med lufttransport, Ebola-epidemien, det er ikke lykkedes at gżre gorillaerne fortrolige med tilstedevžrelsen af mennesker i Lop-reservatet i Gabon, de nationale myndigheders manglende engagement og manglen p interesse hos private investo-rer). 
On the other hand, the promotion of the natural and cultural heritage of these protected areas by developing tourism has been limited because of several factors (cost of air transport, Ebola virus epidemics, lack of success in accustoming gorillas to the presence of humans in the Lop reserve in Gabon, lack of involvement of national authorities and lack of interest of private investors).
Uden for de beskyttede omrder har programmet ikke haft megen effekt. 
Outside the protected areas, the programme has had little impact.
I programmet blev der ikke lagt megen vžgt p s centrale spżrgsml som ulovlig skovning og ulovlig jagt uden for de beskyttede omrder. 
The programme has paid little attention to key issues such as legal and illegal logging, and illegal hunting, outside the protected areas.
Programmet har ikke bidraget meget til at mindske fattigdommen blandt befolkningen i skovene, hvilket til dels skyldes, at de foranstaltninger til udvikling af landdistrikterne, der blev gennemfżrt, slog fejl. 
Its contribution to poverty reduction among forest peoples has been low, partly due to the unsuccessful rural development measures implemented.
De beskyttede omrder er endu ikke finansielt bžredygtige og er fortsat i hżj grad afhžngige af finansiering udefra. 
The protected areas are not financially sustainable and remain highly dependent on external financing.
Det har medfżrt, at Ecofac er blevet forlžnget gentagne gange siden 1992. 
Because of that, ECOFAC has been repeatedly extended since 1992.
Sammen med institutionerne og administrationen, som er ansvarlig for at forvalte de beskyttede omrder, ssom Comifac (confrence ministerielle des frets dŐAfrique centrale), har programmet vžret i stand til at etablere et netvžrk af beskyttede omrder i Centralafrika. 
The programme was able to set up a Network of Protected Areas of Central Africa (RAPAC) together with the institutions and administration responsible for managing the protected area, such as the COMIFAC (Confrence Ministrielle des Forts dŐAfrique Centrale).
Det var et godt skridt henimod at sikre stżrre engagement hos de nationale myndigheder, men der er ikke fulgt finansielle midler med. 
This was a good step to ensure more involvement by the national authorities, but the financial resources have not followed.