natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Efter EF-domstolens dom i sag C-304/02, har de medlemsstater, mod hvem der vžret indledt sdanne procedurer, vžret foranlediget til at gżre en alvorlig indsats for at forbedre overholdelsen af de respektive forpligtelser. 
After the judgement of the ECJ in case C-304/02, Member States subject to such proceedings have been induced to make serious efforts to improve the compliance with the respective obligations.
2371/2002 Kommissionen til at tržffe forebyggende foranstaltninger, at lukke fiskerier, nr den skżnner, at en medlemsstat har opbrugt sin kvote, og at suspendere Fžllesskabets finansielle bistand. 
Apart from infringement proceedings, Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 empowers the Commission to take preventive measures, to close the fishery when it deems a Member State has exhausted its quota and to suspend Community financial assistance.
96-97. 
96. and 97.
Med bestemmelserne i EF-traktatens artikel 226 er der sat visse begržnsninger for overtrždelsesprocedurer mod medlemsstaterne. 
Infringement proceedings against Member States are circumscribed by the provisions of Article 226 of the EC Treaty.
En žndring af bde deres materielle ml og proce-duretrinene ville kržve en žndring af traktaten. 
Modification of both their substantive objectives as well as the procedural steps would require an amendment of the Treaty.
Kommissionens hndtering af overtrždelsesprocedurerne tager udgangspunkt i EF-Domstolens retspraksis. 
The handling by the Commission of infringement proceedings is shaped by the case law of the ECJ.
Kommissionen har bevisbyrden i overtrždelsesprocedurer, hvilket bliver sžrlig relevant i sager, hvor den pstede ikke-overholdelse fra en medlemsstats side bestr i en sžrlig administrativ praksis. 
The Commission has the burden of proof in infringement proceedings, which becomes particularly relevant in cases where the alleged non-compliance by a Member State consists in a particular administrative practice.
I et sdant tilfžlde er det faktisk afgżrende at kunne pvise, at manglerne bde er generelle og varige. 
In such a case, it is actually decisive to demonstrate that the shortcomings are both general and ongoing.
Dette kržver en fortsat indsats fra Kommissionens side for at indsamle de relevante beviser. 
This requires a continuous effort on the side of the Commission to assemble the appropriate means of proof.
Sag C-304/02 understregede vanskelighederne med at indsamle beviser i en situation, hvor problemet var en medlemsstats administrative praksis, og de bestržbelser, der er udfoldet, har faktisk bidraget til, at der er blevet plagt en betydeligt hżjere bżde end for nogle af de fem andre sager, der nogen sinde er blevet afgjort af EF-Domstolen p grundlag af EF-traktatens artikel 228. 
The case C-304/02 underscored the difficulties of assembling proper means of proof in a situation where an administrative practice of a Member State was at issue and the efforts made have in fact contributed to the imposition of a significantly higher fine than those imposed for any of the other five cases ever decided upon by the ECJ on the basis of Article 228 of the EC Treaty.
Forebyggende foranstaltninger i henhold til artikel 26 i forordning (EF) nr. 2371/2002 kan i sagens natur kun vžre midlertidige og tidsbegržnsede (hżjst seks mneder som anfżrt). Fżlgelig kan sdanne forebyggende foranstaltninger kun komme p tale under ganske sžrlige omstžndigheder. 
Preventive measures pursuant to the Article 26 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 can only be provisional in nature and limited in time (up to a maximum of six months, as indicated). Consequently, such preventive measures can only come into play in exceptional circumstances.
Siden 1996 har forpligtelsen til at fratržkke mžngder fra fremtidige fiskerimuligheder vžret gennemfżrt ved anvendelse af forordning (EF) nr. 847/96, som fastlžgger betingelserne for forvaltningen af de samlede tilladte fangstmžngder (TAC) og kvoter fra r til r. 
Since 1996, the obligation to deduct amounts from future fishing opportunities, has been implemented yearly by way of applying Regulation (EC) No 847/96, which establishes the conditions for the year-to-year management of total allowable catches (TACs) and quotas.
Under normale omstžndigheder vil overfiskning blive opdaget i det r, hvor overfiskeriet har fundet sted eller ret efter, og der har derfor aldrig vžret behov for at foretage sig yderligere. 
In normal circumstances over-fishing will have been detected in the year of or the one following the over fishing and thus there was never a need for additional action.
I 2007 indrapporterede to medlemsstater imidlertid efter en national undersżgelse, at der var blevet landet betydelige fangstmžngder fra 2001 til 2004, uden at de var blevet registreret. Da forordning (EF) nr. 
In 2007 however, for the first time, following a national investigation, two Member States reported to the Commission significant amounts of catches which had been landed in the period from 2001 to 2004 without having been recorded.
847/96 ikke forudser fradrag for Čhistorisk overfiskningÇ, mtte Kommissionen udstede en ad hoc-forordning. 
Given that Regulation (EC) No 847/96 does not envisage deductions for such Ôhistoric overfishingŐ, the Commission had to adopt an ad hoc Regulation.
Denne ad hoc-forordning (2) indeholdt en lżsning baseret p en analyse af de biologiske og sociożkonomiske konsekvenser af denne forordning. 
This ad hoc Regulation (2) provided a solution based on an analysis of the biological and socio-economic consequences of this Regulation.
Endelig opfordrede Rdet p baggrund af denne situation p sit mżde den 11. og 12. juni 2007 Kommissionen til i den kommende revision af EU-kontrolforordningerne at opstille en ržkke principper, som skal anvendes over for denne form for overfi-skeri, som opdages i enhver form for EU-fiskeri. 
Finally, in response to this situation, the Council, during its meeting on 11 and 12 June 2007, has invited the Commission to develop principles in the forthcoming review of the EU control regulations to be applied in respect of any such over-fishing which comes to light in any EU fishery.
(1) KOM(2007) 448 endelig. 
(1) COM(2007) 448 final.
(2) Forordning (EF) nr. 147/2007 (EUT L 46 af 16.2.2007, s. 
(2) Regulation (EC) No 147/2007 (OJ L 46, 16.2.2007, p.
28.12.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 317/31 103. 
28.12.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 317/31 103.
Den nuvžrende lovgivning omkring den fžlles fiskeripolitik tillader kun Kommissionen at suspendere udbetalingen af EF-midler, hvis reglerne om fiskerikapacitet ikke overholdes. 
The current CFP legislation only allows the Commission to suspend Community funding in case of non-compliance with the rules concerning fishing capacity.
Det er Kommissionens opfattelse, at en videreudbygning af sdanne foranstaltninger ville vžre nyttige, og den vil udforske mulighederne for at udarbejde forslag i den retning i forbindelse med gennemgangen og revisionen af kontrolforordningen. 
The Commission believes that further extension of such measures would be useful and will explore the possibilities for proposals in that direction in the review and revision of the Control Regulation.
Kontrollen med, om stżttemodtagerne overholder den fžlles fiskeripolitiks regler, er medlemsstaternes ansvar. 
The control on the compliance by beneficiaries with CFP rules is the responsibility of the Member States.
I forbindelse med lukningen af strukturfondsprogrammer for fiskeriet (i overensstemmelse med forordning (EF) nr. 1260/1999) er det Kommissionens rolle at kontrollere medlemsstaternes korrekte gennemfżrelse af programmerne, og hvis der opdages uregelmžssigheder, at inddrive uregelmžssigt udbetalte EF-midler. 
In the process of closing fisheries structural funds programmes (in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999), the role of the Commission is to control the proper execution of programmes by Member States and, where irregularities are detected, to recover Community funds irregularly paid.
Der er sket reelle forbedringer i flere medlemsstater, isžr med hensyn til kontrol med pelagisk fiskeri og havnestats-kontrollen med tredjelandsfartżjers landinger. 
There have been real improvements in several Member States, in particular in the control of the pelagic fisheries and port state control of third country landings.
2, i forordning (EF) nr. 2371/2002 skal Kommissionen stille rapporterne om kontrolbesżg til rdighed for den pgžldende medlemsstat og give medlemsstaten mulighed for at kommentere undersżgelsesresultaterne. 
Article 27(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 requires the Commission to make inspection mission reports available to the Member State concerned and to provide the Member State with the possibility to comment on the mission findings.
Desuden ptžnkes det samtidig med fremsendelsen af besżgsrap-porterne at sende en anmodning til medlemsstaten om at orientere Kommissionen om, hvilke skridt den vil tage for at rette op p manglerne. 
In addition, it is envisaged to include, in the transmission of mission reports, a request to the Member State to inform the Commission of the steps it will take to address the shortcomings.
De europžiske flders fiskerikapacitet er ikke i balance med de forhndenvžrende ressourcer, selv om der er betydelige forskelle mellem medlemsstaterne i denne henseende. 
European fleets, fishing capacity are not in balance with the available resources, although substantial differences exist between Member States in this respect.
Kommissionen vil żge sine bestržbelser p at forbedre medlemsstaternes evaluering af overkapaciteten og appellere til dem om at bringe deres kapacitet i overensstemmelse med fiskerimulighederne. 
The Commission will reinforce its efforts to improve the assessment of overcapacity by Member States and urge them to bring their capacity in line with fishing opportunities.
Der er gjort fremskridt med hensyn til at vurdere virkningen af fangstniveauet i kraft en stadig stżrre mžngde data og rdgivning om miljżmžssige og sociożkonomiske konsekvenser af beslutninger om de forhndenvžrende TAC-niveauer. 
Progress has been made on assessing the impact of the level of catches with an increasing amount of data and advice on ecological and socio-economic consequences of decisions on TAC levels available.
Kommissionens bestržbelser med hensyn til dataindsamlingen og det stadig vigtigere bidrag fra Den Videnskabelige, Tekniske og Żkonomiske Komit for Fiskeri (STECF) er med til at skabe forbedringer af situationen. 
The CommissionŐs efforts in the data collection and the increasingly important contribution of the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) are contributing to improvements in the situation.
Isžr vil den nye forordning om dataindsamling bidrage til at forbedre situationen hvad angr manglerne med hensyn til oplysningernes mžngde og kvalitet p grund af de manglende data fra medlemsstaterne. 
In particular, the new Data Collection Regulation will contribute to improve the situation regarding shortcomings in the amount and quality of information due to lack of data from Member States.
Den generelle tilgang til fiskerikapaciteten har žndret sig. 
The general approach towards fishing capacity has changed.
Under de nuvžrende retlige rammer forvaltes fiskerikapaciteten p grundlag af tilgangs-/afgangsordningen, som fastfryser medlemsstaternes flders kapacitet p det niveau, der gjaldt den 1. januar 2003 (eller tiltrždelsesdatoen for de medlemsstater, der kom med i EU efter denne dato). 
Under the current legal framwork, fishing capacity is managed by the entry/exit regime which freezes the capacity of Member StatesŐ fleets at the level of 1 January 2003 (or date of accession for Member States that joined the Union thereafter).
De langsigtede planer og ind-satsbegržnsningerne er ogs et incitament til at tilpasse fldekapaciteten. 
The long term plans and effort limitations are also an incentive to adjust fleet capacity.
Der tilskyndes ogs til kapacitetsnedskžringer ved hjžlp af stżtte til ophugning af fiskerfartżjer under Den Europžiske Fiskerifond (EFF), som styrkes i tilfžlde af genopretningsplaner. 
Capacity reductions are also favoured through aid for scrapping of fishing vessels under the European Fisheries Fund (EFF), which is reinforced in case of recovery plans.
Det str medlemsstaternes frit for at opretholde deres fldekapacitet p et hvilket som helst niveau under niveauet pr. 1. januar 2003 (eller tiltrždelsesdatoen for de medlemsstater, der kom med i EU efter denne dato), men tilgangs-/afgangsordningen har som virkning, at fiskerikapaciteten kun kan blive mindre (fl-dekapaciteten er blevet mindsket med 6,27 % i tonnage og 7,28 % i maskineffekt i perioden 2003-2005 (1)). 
Member States remain free to keep their fleet capacity at any level below the level at 1 January 2003 (or, for Member States that joined the Union after that date, or their respective dates of accession), but the entry/exit regime has the effect that fishing capacity can only diminish, (fleet capacity has been reduced by 6,27 % in tonnage and 7,28 % in engine power during the period 2003-2005 (1)).
Ifżlge forvaltningsplanerne, som opstiller rammerne for indsatsbegržnsningen, er det medlemsstaternes ansvar at beslutte, om sdanne begržnsninger skal opns ved hjžlp af: a) en nedbringelse af fisketiden uden at nedbringe kapaciteten b) en nedbringelse af kapaciteten uden at nedbring fisketiden, eller c) en kombination af de to. 
According to management plans which establish the framework for effort reduction, it is the responsibility of the Member States to decide whether such reduction will be accomplished through: (a) a reduction of fishing time, without reducing capacity; (b) a reduction of capacity, without reducing the fishing time; or (c) a combination of the two.
Med hensyn til den żgede brug af teknologi er dette spżrgsml uafhžngigt de problemer, der er knyttet til reduktioner af fiskeriindsatsen. 
As regards the increased use of technology, this issue is independent of the problems linked with effort reductions.
En optimering af fartżjernes fangsteffektivitet er efter Kommissionens opfattelse noget, der altid sker, uanset hvad ind-satsbegržnsningerne er. 
Optimising the catching efficiency of vessels, in the CommissionŐs view, is a behaviour that occurs always, whatever the effort limitations are.
Kommissionen foreslog temmelig enkle og kontrollerbare indsatsordninger, men under drżftelserne i Rdet blev systemet gjort betydeligt mere kompliceret p grund af et stort antal fravigelser. 
The Commission proposed rather simple and controllable effort regimes, but during discussions in Council the system was made considerably more complicated, due to a high number of derogations.
Disse blev indfżrt efter forslag fra medlemsstaterne og har ganske rigtigt gjort det meget vanskeligere at kontrollere hele systemet. 
These were introduced on request by Member States and indeed have reduced considerably the controllability of the whole system.
Kommissionen vedtog for nylig en meddelelse, som satte en debat i gang om en forbedring af fiskerikapaciteten og indsatsindikatorer for den fžlles fiskeripolitik (2). 
The Commission recently adopted a Communication launching a debate on improving fishing capacity and effort indicators for the CFP (2).
Kommissionen bekržfter, at det ikke er alle medlemsstaterne, der evaluerer balancen mellem kapacitet og forhndenvžrende ressourcer, og den har til stadighed opfordret de pgžldende til at overholde denne forpligtelse. 
The Commission confirms that not all Member States assess their matching of capacity and available resources and has repeatedly urged those concerned to comply with this obligation.
(1) rsrapport 2005, KOM(2006) 872. 
(1) Annual report 2005, COM(2006) 872.
(2) KOM(2007) 39 endelig. 
(2) COM(2007) 39 final.
C 317/32 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 28.12.2007 119-120. 
C 317/32 EN Official Journal of the European Union 28.12.2007 119. and 120.
Kommissionen er klar over risiciene i forbindelse med plideligheden af den nuvžrende mling af maskineffekt og tržffer foranstaltninger til nżje at overvge dette og prżve at forbedre situationen. 
The Commission is aware of the risks concerning the reliability of the current measurement of engine power and is taking action to closely monitor this and to try to improve the situation.
Den nžvnte bestemmelse var ikke medtaget i det oprindelige kommissionsforslag. 
The provision mentioned was not included in the original Commission proposal.
Endelig er disse foranstaltninger, for at forhindre forżget fiskeri-kapacitet, blev strengt begržnset og udformet sledes, at de opnr en yderligere reduktion af kapaciteten bde gennem kravet om en reduktion p 20 % i tilfžlde af maskinudskiftning for stżrre fartżjer samt gennem finansiering af ophugning af fiskerfartżjer. 
Finally, in order to avoid increases in fishing capacity these measures have been strictly limited and designed to achieve further reduction in capacity both through the requirement of a reduction of 20 % in case of engine replacement for larger vessels, as well as through the financing of scrapping of fishing vessels.
Samtidig vil denne procentdel permanent blive fratrukket det tilladte loft for fldekapaciteten. 
At the same time this percentage will be permanently deducted from the authorised fleet capacity ceiling.
KONKLUSIONER OG ANBEFALINGER 121. 
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 121.
Kommissionen er enig i Rettens konklusioner med hensyn til manglerne i bestemmelserne om kontrol, inspektion og hndhžvelse, som sžtter effektiviteten i den fžlles fiskeripolitik p spil. 
The Commission shares the conclusions of the Court on the shortcomings of the provisions concerning control, inspection and enforcement, which endanger the effectiveness of the Common Fisheries Policy.
P denne baggrund gżr Kommissionen sig allerede overvejelser om en ambitiżs reform af den europžiske fiskerikontrolpolitik. 
In the light of that situation, the Commission already started a reflection in view of an ambitious reform of the European policy for fisheries control.
Rettens anbefalinger med hensyn til at forbedre situationen kan tjene som et effektivt bidrag til denne reforms succes. 
The recommendations made by the Court with regard to improving the situation, can serve as an effective contribution to the success of this reform.
Den nuvžrende tilgang til kapacitetsforvaltning har vžret resultatet af et vanskeligt kompromis, der blev indget i forbindelse med reformen af den fžlles fiskeripolitik i 2002, og den er baseret p: a) en tilgangs-/afgangsordning, der forhindrer en kapacitetsforżgelse b) indstilling af offentlig stżtte til skibsbygning og -modernisering (undtagen af sikkerhedshensyn og i tilfžlde, hvor fiskerikapaciteten ikke żges) c) flerrige forvaltningsordninger, som omfatter forvaltning af fiskeriindsatsen, og som giver fiskerisektoren et mellem-til langfristet perspektiv d) finansielle incitamenter til permanent tilbagetržkning af kapacitet, og e) en formel forpligtelse for medlemsstaterne til at ivžrksžtte foranstaltninger og tilpasse deres flders kapacitet. 
The current approach to capacity management has been the result of a difficult compromise made during the CFP reform in 2002, and it is based on: (a) an entry-exit regime preventing capacity increase; (b) cessation of public aid to ship building and modernisation (except for safety reasons and where the capacity to catch fish does not increase); (c) multiannual management regimes that include effort management and that provide a mid-to-long term perspective to the fishing industry; (d) financial incentives for permanent withdrawal of capacity; and (e) a formal obligation for Member States to put measures in place to adapt the capacity of their fleets.
Derfor er forvaltning af fiskeriindsatsen, selv om den er vigtig, ikke det eneste element i den nžvnte ordning, og det vil vžre den kombinerede effekt af alle elementerne, der vil vžre afgżrende for effektiviteten i denne nye politik, der skal lżse overkapacitetspro-blemet. 
Therefore, effort management, although important, is not the only element of the said regime, and it will be the combined effect of all the elements that will determine the effectiveness of this new policy to address overcapacity.
Hvis den gennemfżres korrekt uden begržnsninger, vil en tilpasning af kapaciteten blive et uundgeligt resultat af denne nye politik. 
If properly and fully implemented, capacity adjustment will be an inevitable result of the new policy.
Kommissionen vil fortsat lžgge pres p medlemsstaterne for at hjžlpe med at forbedre situationen og agter at benytte den kommende gennemgang og revision af kontrolforordningen som en lejlighed til efter omstžndighederne at tage spżrgsmlet om plideligheden af fangstdata op i en fžllesskabssammenhžng. 
The Commission will continue to put pressure on Member States to help improve the situation and intends to use the forthcoming review and revision of the Control Regulation as an occasion to, where appropriate, address the issue of reliability of catch data in Community context.
128. a) Komiten for Fiskeri og Akvakultur skal stemme om de foreslede gennemfżrelsesregler for elektronisk registrering fżr udgangen af 2007. b) Et omdefineret format for de rapporter, medlemsstaterne skal fremsende for at lette analysen heraf og gżre kontrollen mere effektiv, er blevet afprżvet med succes og vil blive forelagt medlemsstaterne i efterret 2007. c) Dette er et spżrgsml, der vil blive taget op i forbindelse med gennemgangen og revisionen af kontrolforordningen. d) Siden 2005 har Kommissionen gjort en indsats for at forbedre anvendelsen af tilpasningskoefficienter, lige fra indsamling af tilpasningskoefficienter, der blev anvendt i medlemsstaterne i 2005, til offentliggżrelse af en omfattende liste p websiden, og den har i den forbindelse udarbejdet to uofficielle dokumenter efter mżder med medlemsstaterne og Norge. 
128. (a) The Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture is due to vote on the proposed implementing rules for the electronic recording before the end of 2007. (b) A redefined format for transmission of reports by Member States to facilitate their analysis and control has been successfully tested and will be presented to Member States in the autumn of 2007. (c) This is an issue being addressed in the review and revision of the Control Regulation. (d) From 2005 the Commission has made efforts to improve the application of the conversion factors, starting with the compilation of conversion factors in use by Member States in 2005 and the publication of a comprehensive list on the website, by producing two non-papers following meetings with Member States and with Norway.
Kommissionen er ved at foretage en yderligere finpudsning af det sidste dokument, som vil blive drżftet med medlemsstaterne fżr udgangen af 2007, hvorefter Kommissionen agter at udarbejde et lovgivningsforslag herom. e) For at sikre, at der er logisk sammenhžng i de data, der modtages fra begge parter, arbejder Kommissionen snžvert sammen med Eurostat p grundlag af et aftalememorandum. 
A further refinement of the last paper is currently under preparation and will be discussed with Member States before the end of 2007, after which the Commission intends to prepare a legislative proposal on the matter. (e) To ensure that there is coherence in the data received by both parties, the Commission is working closely with Eurostat on the basis of a Memorandum of Understanding.
Spżrgsmlet om effektivitet og overensstemmelse i de nationale kontrolsystemer tages op i forbindelse med gennemgangen og revisionen af kontrolforordningen. 
The issue of effectiveness and coherence of national control systems is being addressed in the review and revision of the Control Regulation.