natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nr der er interventionslagre til rdighed, udgżr de den vigtigste forsyningskilde for programmet. 
When available they constitute the priority source of supply for the programme.
Desuden kan Kommissionen ved at afsžtte interventionslagre gennem programmet spare de oplagringsomkostninger, som ellers skulle have vžret afholdt over EU-budgettet. 
Furthermore, the disposal of intervention stocks through this scheme enables the Community to save the storage costs that otherwise would have to be borne by the EU budget.
Udbuddene gennemfżres af medlemsstaterne under deres myndighed. 
Tenders are run by Member States under their authority.
Se Kommissionens svar p punkt 64. 
See Commission reply to paragraph 64.
Kommissionen fżlger navnlig udviklingen i markedspriserne for uforarbejdede landbrugsprodukter, mens udbuddene vedrżrer fżdevarer, der er klar til brug. 
The Commission mainly follows the evolution of market prices for unprocessed agricultural products while the tenders concern food ready for consumption.
Det er ikke muligt at drage operationelle konklusioner ud fra sammenligninger mellem de to typer priser. 
No operational conclusions can be based on comparisons between both types of prices.
Se Kommissionens svar p punkt 64. 
See the Commission reply to paragraph 64.
Direktiv 2004/18/EF om fremgangsmderne ved indgelse af offentlige vareindkżbskontrakter, offentlige tjenesteydelseskontrakter og offentlige bygge-og anlžgskontrakter gžlder i alle medlemsstaterne. 
Directive 2004/18/EC governing the procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, is in force in all Member States.
Selv nr der er forskel p bestemmelserne om udbudsprocedurer inden for en medlemsstat, er de stadig i overensstemmelse med direktivet. 
Even when, within a Member State, provisions regulating tendering procedures differ, they remain in conformity with the Directive.
Direktivets kapitel VI indeholder bestemmelser om offentliggżrelse af udbud. 
Chapter VI of the Directive contains provisions on publicity of the calls.
Udbud skal offentliggżres i bde de nationale stats-tidender og i Den Europžiske Unions Tidende. 
Calls for tender are required to be published in national Official Journals, as well as in the Official Journal of the European Union.
I nogle af de medlemsstater, som Revisionsretten har besżgt, offentliggżres udbud ogs via internettet. 
In some Member States visited by the Court, calls for tender are also publicised via Internet.
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR Bestemmelserne om frister for indgivelse af bud er fastsat i direktivets artikel 38 og kan variere alt efter de valgte gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser, jf. artikel 36. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Provisions regarding the delays for submission of offers are laid down in Art. 38 of the Directive and can vary according to the modalities of implementation chosen in Article 36.
Kriterierne for tildeling af kontrakter er beskrevet i artikel 53, nemlig det żkonomisk mest fordelagtige tilbud med hensyn til tilbudt mžngde/transportomkostninger eller det bud, hvor prisen er lavest. 
The criteria to award contracts are the ones described in Article 53: i.e. the most advantageous offer in terms of quantity offered/ transport cost, or the lower offer in terms of price.
Kommissionen bemžrkede ogs, at antallet af deltagere, som indgav bud, sommetider var lavt, men den fandt ingen tegn p, at der var en forbindelse mellem den lave deltagelse og den mde, hvorp direktivets krav blev gennemfżrt. 
The Commission too noted the sometimes low number of participants submitting bids but it found no evidence of a link between the low participation and the way the Directive requirements were implemented.
P grund af forskellene, bde vedrżrende mžngden og kvaliteten af de produkter, der skal leveres, er det ikke muligt at sammenligne de priser, som opns under udbud, med markedspriser. 
Given the diversity both in terms of quantity and quality of the products to be supplied, it is not possible to compare prices obtained under the calls for tender with market prices.
Der kan derfor ikke p dette grundlag drages nogen konklusioner vedrżrende ČkvalitetenÇ af de afgivne bud. 
Consequently, no conclusion can be drawn on this basis about the ‘quality’ of the offers submitted.
Kommissionens revision viste ogs, at en ržkke virksomheder fik tildelt kontrakter over flere r, men der er ingen tegn p, at der er en forbindelse mellem den lave deltagelse og den mde, hvorp direktivets krav blev gennemfżrt. 
The Commission audits also found that several companies were awarded contracts over several years but there is no evidence of a link between the low participation and the way the Directive requirements were implemented.
Ordningen har lige fra begyndelsen sigtet mod at mindske interventionslagrene for at reducere EUŐs oplagringsomkostninger. 
The scheme since its beginning aimed at withdrawing stocks from intervention, relieving EU expenses on storage costs.
Der bżr tages hensyn til denne yderligere żkonomiske virkning. 
This additional economic effect should be taken into account.
6/2009 Ń Den Europžiske Unions fżdevarehjžlp til socialt drligt stillede personer: en vurdering af mlene og de anvendte midler og metoder 53 a) I betragtning af dette programs grundlžggende forbindelse med interventionslagrene var modkżb indtil for nylig det centrale i ordningen. b) Nžsten alle medlemsstaterne har oprettet udvalg, der skal fastsžtte referencer for modkżb, herunder de medlemsstater, som Revisionsretten besżgte. 
Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed 53 (a) Given the basic link of this programme with intervention stocks, bartering was until recently the core of the scheme. (b) Almost all Member States have in place committees to establish bartering references, including those Member States visited by the Court.
Kommissionen glžder sig over Revisionsrettens positive vurdering af de forskellige elementer i Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning, men den żnsker ikke at foregribe resultatet af de politiske drżftelser, som nu er i gang p dette grundlag. 
While appreciating the Court’s positive assessment of various elements of the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation, the Commission does not wish to pre-empt the outcome of the political discussions currently taking place on this basis.
Kommissionen vil desuden gerne understrege, at Europa-Parlamentets udtalelse5 ikke sžtter spżrgsmlstegn ved muligheden for fortsat at finansiere denne foranstaltning via udgifter under den fžlles landbrugspolitik. 
Further, the Commission would like to stress that the European Parliament’s opinion5 does not call into question the opportunity to continue to finance this measure through CAP expenditure.
Som anfżrt i punkt 25 vokser interventionslagrene for visse produkter under de nuvžrende markedsforhold. 
As mentioned in paragraph 25 above, intervention stocks for certain products are increasing under current market conditions.
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 75. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 75.
Det ville ikke volde nogen stżrre kontrol-problemer at fastsžtte forpligtelser vedrżrende produktets oprindelse, men det ville plžgge medlemsstaternes myndigheder en enorm administrativ byrde uden at gżre ordningen mere effektiv, snarere tvžrtimod. 
Setting obligations on the origin of the product would not only pose major control difficulties but would impose a huge administrative burden for Member States’ administrations without any improvement of the efficiency of the scheme, rather the contrary.
KONKLUSIONER OG ANBEFALINGER 76. 
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 76.
Foranstaltningen har to komplementžre ml, nemlig markedsstabilisering og at hjžlpe de socialt drligst stillede. 
The measure has two complementary objectives: market stabilisation and contributing to the well-being of the most deprived.
Den evalueringsrapport, som Revisionsretten henviser til, blev udarbejdet af uafhžngige konsulenter, og dens konklusioner skal lžses under hensyntagen til Kommissionens kritiske bemžrkninger om undersżgelsens kvalitet, specielt med hensyn til metoden, analysens holdbarhed og resultaternes trovžrdighed. 
The evaluation report to which the Court refers was elaborated by independent consultants and its conclusions should be read taking into consideration the Commission’s critical remarks on the quality of the study, in particular with regard to its methodology, the robustness of the analysis and the credibility of the results.
Europa-Parlamentet har lige offentliggjort sin udtalelse6, hvori den med visse žndringer stżtter Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning, som tilpasser foranstaltningen til de nuvžrende forhold. 
The European Parliament has just released its opinion6 supporting with certain amendments the proposal of the Commission for a new Council Regulation adapting the measure to new prevailing conditions.
Beslutningerne om fortsat at gennemfżre programmet er truffet p grundlag af foranstaltningens resultater med hensyn til svel den sociale dimension som markedsstabiliseringsdimensionen. 
Decisions to continue implementing the programme have been taken on the merits of the measure on both its social and market stabilisation dimensions.
6 Jf. fodnote 5. 
6 See footnote 5.
1290/2005 om finansiering af den fžlles landbrugspolitik og forordning (EF) nr. 1234/2007 om en fžlles markedsordning for landbrugsprodukter og om sžrlige bestemmelser for visse landbrugsprodukter (fusionsmarkedsordningen), for s vidt angr uddeling af fżdevarer til de socialt drligst stillede personer i Fžllesskabet (KOM(2008) 0563 Ń C6-0353/2008 Ń 2008/0183(CNS)). 
5 European Parliament legislative resolution of 26 March 2009 (TA/2009/188) on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy and Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) as regards food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community (COM(2008)0563 — C6-0353/2008 — 2008/0183(CNS)).
Sžrberetning nr. 6/2009 Ń Den Europžiske Unions fżdevarehjžlp til socialt drligt stillede personer: en vurdering af mlene og de anvendte midler og metoder 
Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed
Selv om Kommissionen glžder sig over Revisionsrettens positive vurdering af dens forslag til en ny rdsforordning, żnsker den ikke at foregribe resultaterne af den igangvžrende debat i Rdet om, hvordan denne foranstaltning bżr finansieres fremover. 
Although the Commission appreciates the Court’s positive assessment about its proposal for a new Council Regulation, it does not wish to pre-empt the ongoing debate at Council level on the appropriate financing of this measure for the future.
Ovennžvnte udtalelse fra Europa-Parlamentet afspejler Europa-Parlamentets stżtte til, at foranstaltningen fortsat finansieres via den fžlles landbrugspolitik. 
The abovementioned EP opinion reflects the support of this institution for the measure to continue to be funded from the Common Agricultural Policy.
Anbefaling 1 Efter at have foretaget en grundig analyse af programmets tekniske, politiske og juridiske elementer (se den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning) konkluderede Kommissionen, at den fžlles landbrugspolitik var den rette ramme for en viderefżrelse af ordningen. 
Recommendation 1 After having analysed in an extensive way the technical, political and legal elements of the programme (see the Impact Assessment supporting the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation), the Commission has concluded that the CAP was the appropriate frame for the continuation of the scheme.
Efter Kommissionens mening sker der en tilstržkkelig samordning med og hżring af alle de relevante aktżrer i forbindelse med medlemsstaternes gennemfżrelse af programmet, selv om der altid m tilstržbes yderligere fremskridt p dette omrde. 
The Commission is of the view that the programme is being implemented by Member States with a satisfactory level of coordination and consultation with all relevant actors although further progress in this domain is always to be pursued.
Anbefaling 2 Programmet har i en rržkke haft en betydelig lżftestangsvirkning p udviklingen af fżdevareinitiativer eller tilsvarende foranstaltninger i private organer (velgżrende organisationer) og offentlige myndigheder (p medlemsstatsplan og lokalt plan). 
Recommendation 2 For years, the programme has had a powerful leverage effect on the development of food initiatives or related measures by private bodies (charities) and public authorities (Member State and local levels).
Denne rolle kan fremmes yderligere. 
Such role can be further promoted.
Under hensyntagen til subsidiaritetsprincippet blev en ržkke muligheder for at styrke forbindelsen mellem ordningen og andre tilsvarende tiltag analyseret som led i konsekvensanalysen, og nogle af dem blev medtaget i Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning. 
While taking due account of the subsidiarity principle, several options to enhance the link between the scheme and other similar actions were analysed in the context of the Impact Assessment and some of them were included in the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation.
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 80. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 80.
Et af mlene med denne foranstaltning er at sikre velgżrende organisationer en plidelig kilde til fżdevarer, som de kan bruge til at hjžlpe de socialt drligst stillede. 
One of the aims of this measure is to provide charities with a stable and reliable source of foodstuffs for assisting the most deprived persons.
I den forbindelse kan programmets virkning ikke udelukkende vurderes ud fra det gennemsnitlige antal mltider, som det leverer, men m vurderes ud fra, i hvilket omfang det bidrager til forsyningerne til velgżrende organisationer. 
In this sense, the impact of the programme cannot be merely assessed on the average number of meals that it provides but on the extent to which it does contribute to the supply of charitable organisations.
Dette ml ns i vidt omfang, da programmet tegner sig for mellem 30 og 70 % af den samlede mžngde mad, som uddeles i Fžllesskabet til de socialt drligst stillede, alt efter hvilke velgżrende organisationer og medlemsstater man ser p. 
This aim is largely attained as far as the programme provides between 30 and 70 % of the total food distributed in the Community to the most deprived people, depending on the charities and the Member States.
I medfżr af subsidiaritetsprincippet er det medlemsstaterne, der fastlžgger kriterierne for, hvilken befolkningsgruppe der har adgang til den fżdevarehjžlp, som uddeles via denne foranstaltning. 
By virtue of the subsidiarity principle, Member States define the criteria of the population having access to the food aid distributed by this measure.
Anbefaling 3 Kommissionen har allerede analyseret dette spżrgsml som led i den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede forslaget til en ny rdsforordning. 
Recommendation 3 The Commission already analysed this issue in the framework of the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation.
Den konkluderede, at ordningen fungerer mere effektivt, nr subsidiaritetsprincippet overholdes, dvs. nr det er medlemsstaterne, der bestemmer, hvilke modtagere stżtten skal rettes mod. 
It concluded that the respect of the subsidiarity principle goes along with a higher efficiency of the scheme when the targeting of the beneficiaries remains the Member State’s competence.
Denne holdning stżttes af et stort flertal af aktżrerne og stemmer overens med resultatet af en offentlig internethżring, hvor der indkom over 14 000 svar. 
This position is supported by an overwhelming majority of stakeholders and coincides with the result of a public Internet consultation that received more that 14 000 replies.
I Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning plžgges medlemsstaterne en forpligtelse til at udarbejde nationale programmer for uddeling af fżdevarer, som skal indeholde udfżrlige oplysninger om modtagerne og om de velgżrende organisationer, der deltager i programmet. 
The Commission’s proposal for a new Council Regulation incorporates the obligation for Member States to prepare national food distribution programmes that would include comprehensive information on recipients and charities taking part in the programme.
De nžrmere regler vil blive fastlagt i gennemfżrelsesbestemmelserne efter vedtagelsen af Kommissionens forslag. 
Details will be laid down in the implementing rules after the adoption of the Commission proposal.
I renes lżb har Kommissionen tilpasset gennemfżrelsesbestemmelserne for ordningen for at opblżde kriterierne for, hvilke produkter der kan uddeles. 
Over the years the Commission has adjusted the implementing rules of the scheme in order to soften the criteria on the products to be distributed.
Anbefaling 4 Ophžvelsen af denne begržnsning indgr i Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning7. 
Recommendation 4 The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation7 includes the removal of this restriction.
En sdan ordning skal i sagens natur kunne tilpasses til meget forskellige situationer i de enkelte deltagende medlemsstater. 
By its very nature, such a scheme has to adapt to very different situations in the various participating Member States.
Derfor er den brede vifte af systemer en vigtig forudsžtning for, at foranstaltningen kan fungere effektivt. 
For this reason, the variety of systems is an essential prerequisite of the proper functioning of the measure.
Behovet for mad varierer meget fra den ene stżttemodtager til den anden og over tid. 
The needs of food aid vary hugely between individual aid recipients and over time.
Forskellene i den mžngde mad, som uddeles til de enkelte stżttemodtagere, kan derfor ikke udlžgges som forskelsbehandling. 
The differences in the quantity of food distributed to every individual aid recipient can therefore not be presented as unequal treatment.
Fastsžttelsen af fžlles standarder ville ikke nżdvendigvis medfżre en forbedring af foranstaltningens virkning, der, som det fremgr af tekstboks 5 i Revisionsrettens beretning, er ganske betydelig i lyset af den andel af den mad, som uddeles af ngoŐerne, der stammer fra EU-programmet. 
The setting of common standards would not necessarily result in improving the impact of the measure that, as proven in Box 5 of the Court’s report, is very substantial in the light of the share of food distributed by NGOs sourced from the EU programme.
1234/2007 om en fžlles markedsordning for landbrugsprodukter og om sžrlige bestemmelser for visse landbrugsprodukter (fusionsmarkedsordningen), for s vidt angr uddeling af fżdevarer til de socialt drligst stillede personer i Fžllesskabet (KOM(2008) 563 endelig). 
7 Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy and Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) as regards food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community (COM(2008) 563 final).
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR Anbefaling 5 Hvis der indfżres standarder p fžllesskabsplan, kan det forhindre, at programmet bevarer den fleksibilitet, som er nżdvendig, hvis det skal kunne tilpasses til de socialt drligt stilledes forskellige omstžndigheder. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION Recommendation 5 Introducing standards at Community level could hinder the necessary flexibility the programme must preserve in order to adapt to the varied circumstances of the most deprived.
Efter Kommissionens mening giver den mde, hvorp programmet gennemfżres nu, og som i vidt omfang bygger p subsidiaritetsprincippet, en stor virkning, og den muliggżr en lige behandling af alle stżttemodtagerne. 
The Commission considers that the way the programme is currently run, with a large element of subsidiarity built in it, attains a significant impact and allows an equal treatment to all the aid recipients.
Kommissionen kan ligeledes p grundlag af sine revisioner fastsl, at medlemsstaternes gennemfżrelse alt i alt er tilfredsstillende, selv om der kan gżres yderligere fremskridt p visse omrder. 
The Commission, also based on its audits, can claim that Member States implementation is globally satisfactory even if certain areas may improve further.
Metoden for tildeling af finansielle midler er gennemsigtig og baseret p de bedste foreliggende statistiske oplysninger. r efter r tilslutter de deltagende medlemsstater sig denne metode, nr de stemmer for rsplanerne i Forvaltningskomiten. 
The method for the allocation of financial resources is transparent and based on the best statistical information available.
Anbefaling 6 I den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede forslaget til en ny rdsforordning, blev der foreslet en ržkke mlelige ml. 
Recommendation 6 In the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation, a series of measurable objectives has been proposed.
Kommissionen vil overveje at indfżre tilsvarende resultatindikatorer i forbindelse med revisionen af gennemfżrelsesbestemmelserne efter vedtagelsen af den nye rdsforordning. 
The Commission will consider introducing corresponding performance indicators in the framework of the revision of the implementing rules after the adoption of the new Council Regulation.
Kommissionen har ligeledes meddelt, at den har til hensigt at styrke medlemsstaternes rapporteringsforpligtelser, specielt gennem de nye nationale programmer for uddeling af fżdevarer, for at sikre en bedre opfżlgning af ordningen og gradvis forbedre planlžgningen og forvaltningen. 
The Commission has equally expressed its intention to reinforce Member States’ reporting obligations in particular through the new national food distribution programmes, in order to ensure a better follow-up of the scheme and improve its planning and management over time.
Direktiv 2004/18/EF om samordning af fremgangsmderne ved indgelse af offentlige vareindkżbskontrakter, offentlige tjenesteydelseskontrakter og offentlige bygge-og anlžgskontrakter udgżr et fžlles retsgrundlag for hele EU. 
Directive 2004/18/EC on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, provides a common legal basis throughout the EU.
Ifżlge de revisioner, som Kommissionen har foretaget, er de udbud, som medlemsstaterne har gennemfżrt, i overensstemmelse med direktivet. 
The audits carried out by the Commission conclude to the compliance of the call for tenders run by the Member States with the Directive.
De forskelle i betingelserne, som findes i medlemsstaterne, er hjemlet i direktivet. 
Differences in modalities found in the Member States are foreseen in the Directive.
Nogle aktżrer deltager i udbud, som afholdes i andre medlemsstater. 
Sometimes operators take part in tenders organised in other Member States.
Anbefaling 7 Kommissionen har allerede analyseret spżrgsmlet om udbudsprocedurerne i den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning, herunder en ržkke ider til, hvordan offentliggżrelsen af udbud i hele EU kan forbedres. 
Recommendation 7 The Commission already analysed the question of the tendering procedures in the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation including some ideas for enhancing the EU-wide publicity of the tenders.
Der kan fastlžgges detaljerede regler herfor i de nye gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser efter vedtagelsen af en ny rdsforordning. 
Detailed rules may be laid down in the new implementing rules after the adoption of a new Council Regulation.