natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prisnedsžttelsernes og jordudtagningsordningens produktionsre-ducerende effekt blev svžkket af fżlgende forhold: a) gunstige vejrforhold i 1995 og 1996 i store omrder af Nord-europa, hvor de stżrste produktionsarealer findes (jf. punkt 4.7) b) arealstżtte, som har vžret et incitament for landbrugerne til at dyrke markafgrżder, hvor korn er den vigtigste afgrżde (jf. punkt 4.19) ( 39 punkt 3.30. ) 
The production-reducing effects of the price cuts and set-aside were weakened by the following factors: (a) favourable weather conditions in 1995 and 1996 in broad areas of northern Europe, where the main production areas are located (see paragraph 4.7); (b) area-aid payments, which motivated farmers to grow arable crops, of which cereals are the most important (see paragraph 4.19);
8.7.1999 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 192/27 c) stigende priser p verdensmarkedet, da produktionen var lavere end forbruget, hvilket skyldtes reduktionen af korn-dyrkningsarealet, og at kornudbyttet er steget i et langsommere tempo siden midten af 80Őerne (40) (jf. punkt 4.16) d) bevžgelser i krydskursen ecu/nationale valutaer, som udlignede prisfaldene i national valuta i nogle medlemsstater (jf. punkt 4.17). 
8.7.1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 192/27 (c) increasing prices on the world market as production lagged behind consumption due to the decline in world area allocated to cereals and to the slow down in world yield increases since the mid-1980s (40) (see paragraph 4.16); (d) currency movements against the ecu, which offset the price cuts in the national currency of some Member States (see paragraph 4.17).
Det fremgr klart af den seneste udvikling p markedet, at den stabilitet, der blev skabt i overgangsperioden, ikke kan opretholdes. 
Looking at the recent evolution of the market it is evident that the stability achieved during the transitional period cannot be sustained.
Og hvis der blev indfżrt en og samme stżttesats for korn og oliefrż, kunne det gżre det relativt mere attraktivt at żge kornproduktionen (jf. punkt 4.6). 
Furthermore, the introduction of a single aid rate for cereals and oilseeds could affect the relative attractiveness of cereal production (see paragraph 4.6).
Hvis de hżje priser p EU-markedet i forhold til verdensmarkedspriserne opretholdes, og der samtidig er overskud af EU-produceret korn, har Fžllesskabet et meget alvorligt problem. 
The maintenance of high prices on the home market by comparison with world prices combined with surpluses of home-grown cereals, presents the Community with a very difficult problem.
Det bliver vanskeligt at afsžtte overskud, fordi WTO sžtter lofter over de samlede belżb, der kan udbetales i eksportrestitutioner, og over de mžngder korn, der kan eksporteres med eksportrestitutioner. 
Disposal of surpluses is constrained by WTO limits on the total amounts of export refunds and on the volume of cereals which may be exported with the aid of refunds.
Disse gržnser vil sandsynligvis blive sžnket yderligere under den nžste forhandlingsrunde. 
These limits are likely to be further reduced during the next round of negotiations.
Agenda 2000 indeholder ikke forslag til alternative lżsninger p dette problem, bortset fra en prisnedsžttelse, som mske ikke er stor nok. 
Agenda 2000, apart from a price cut which could prove inadequate, contains no alternative proposal as to how this problem may be solved.
Det er ikke en varig lżsning at nedbringe overskuddene alene ved interventionsoplagring. 
Allowing surpluses to be dealt with by means of intervention storage alone is not a sustainable solution.
Reformens effekt p landbrugsindkomsterne er beskrevet i punkt 4.29-4.46. 
The effect of the reform on farm income is described in paragraphs 4.29 to 4.46.
Mlet for reformen var at kompensere landbrugerne for indkomsttab, som skyldtes nedsžttelsen af de institutionelle priser til et gennemsnitligt fžllesskabsniveau. 
The objective of the reform was to compensate farmers for income losses due to the reduction in institutional prices to an average Community level.
Sigtet med reformen var ikke at džkke potentielle tab, som skyldtes, at godtgżrelsen var baseret p gennemsnitlige udbytter og gennemsnitlige dyrkningsarealer, som var blevet fastfrosset p deres historiske niveau, og tillige baseret p en og samme gennemsnitlige indikativpris for samtlige kornsorter og ikke p markedspriserne i hver enkelt medlemsstat. 
The reform did not seek to cover potential losses caused by the fact that compensation was based on average yields and cultivation areas that had been frozen at their historical levels and on a single average target price for all cereals, rather than on the specific market prices in each Member State.
Reformen gik for vidt med hensyn til at kompensere landbrugerne for deres indkomsttab. 
The reform carried the objective of compensating farmers for income losses too far.
I de fem r 1993-(40) Europa-Kommissionen, CAP Working Notes: The Outlook of World Cereal Markets, ISBN 92-827-8813-X, Bruxelles-Luxembourg, oktober 1996, s. 2. 1997 blev landbrugerne globalt set faktisk overkompenseret med ca. 
In fact, over the five-year (40) European Commission, CAP working notes: The outlook of world cereal markets, ISBN 92-827-8813-X, Brussels-Luxembourg October 1996, p.2. period 1993 to 1997, on a global level farmers were over-compensated by about ECU 13 100 million.
Men selv hvis der ikke var sket overkompensation p fžllesskabsplan, ville den metode, der anvendes til beregning af arealstżtten, have resulteret i overkompensation i nogle medlemsstater, hvor markedspriserne var hżjere end den faste gennemsnitlige indikativpris, og omvendt. 
However, even if over-compensation had not taken place at Community level, the actual manner in which area aid was calculated would have led to over-compensation in some Member States where market prices were higher than the fixed average target price, and vice versa.
Endvidere blev landbrugere, hvis historiske udbytter var hżjere end det gennemsnitlige udbytte, straffet, mens landbrugere med lavere udbytte drog fordel af dette system. 
Furthermore, individual farmers with historical yields that were higher than the average were penalised while farmers with lower yields benefited from this system.
Reformen tog ikke denne effekt i betragtning. 
The reform did not take account of this effect.
Reformen tog heller ikke et andet aspekt i betragtning, nemlig jo stżrre bedrift, jo stżrre offentlig stżtte fr bedriften. Det er ikke i overensstemmelse med det politiske żnske om fżrst og fremmest at hjžlpe sm landbrugere. 
Moreover, the reform did not address the point that the larger a farm is, the greater is the public support it receives, thus jeopardising the political intention to help small farmers first and foremost.
Dette problem kan kun lżses ved, at der lžgges loft over den offentlige stżtte til den enkelte bedrift. 
This problem can only be solved by placing a ceiling on public farm support.
Agenda 2000 omfatter forslag om lofter og om et degressivt arealstżttesystem. 
Agenda 2000 proposes ceilings and a degressive system of area aid.
Lofter og degressive stżttesystemer indebžrer imidlertid den risiko, at stżrre bedrifter deles op i mindre bedrifter for at opn mere stżtte. 
However ceilings and degressive aid systems engender the risk of large farms being split up into smaller ones so that more aid may be obtained.
Retten erkender helt og fuldt, at det er vanskeligt at opfylde alle mlene i EF-traktatens artikel 39 samtidig. 
The Court is fully aware that it is difficult to achieve all the objectives of Article 39 of the EC Treaty simultaneously.
Indkomstmlet har vžret et af de fremherskende ml i alle rene efter indfżrelsen af den fžlles landbrugspolitik. 
The income objective has been one of the predominant ones in all the years since the introduction of the CAP.
Det kunne imidlertid overvejes, om lżsningen kunne vžre at beregne landbrugsstżtten p et andet grundlag end priser, produktion og areal. 
However one could envisage a solution whereby farm support could be determined on a basis which is different from prices, production or area.
Den kunne f.eks. beregnes p grundlag af en standardnettoindtžgt pr. husstand eller arbejdsenhed. 
It could be based on, for example, a standard net income per farm household or working unit.
Skulle markedet ikke kunne sikre landbrugeren en sdan minimumsindtžgt, kunne forskellen s delvis udlignes ved hjžlp af landbrugsstżtte. 
If sufficient income were not earned on the market, farm support would be triggered to make up part of the difference.
Ethvert politisk tiltag skal naturligvis blandt andet opfylde kravet i traktatens artikel 39, stk. 1, litra b), om Č...at sikre landbrugsbefolkningen en rimelig levestandard...Ç. Stigninger i bedriftens indkomst, s den nr op over ČstandardnettoindkomstenÇ, skal imidlertid komme fra żget produktivitet, som opns gennem tekniske fremskridt, rationel udvikling af landbrugsproduktionen, optimal udnyttelse af produktionsfaktorerne som fastsat i traktatens artikel 39, stk. 
It is clear that any policy approach should, in part, meet the requirement of Article 39(1)(b) of the Treaty: Ô... to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community ... Ő. Any increase in individual farm earnings beyond the Ôstandard net incomeŐ however, has to come from increasing productivity through technical progress, the rational development of agricultural production, the optimum use of factors of production, as required by Article 39(1)(a) and the adjustment of structures as required by Article 39(2)(b).
Konklusionen m blive, at Mac Sharry-reformen har vžret et lille skridt i den rigtige retning. 
To summarise, it can be said that the Mac Sharry reform has taken a small step in the right direction.
Med reformen er den offentlige stżtte ydet inden for rammerne af den fžlles markedsordning for korn blevet gennemskuelig, fordi prisstżtten er blevet erstattet af direkte stżtte, som betales af skatteyderne. 
It has served the aim of rendering public support of the COM in cereals transparent by replacing price support with direct aid paid by the taxpayer.
Det har som forventet medfżrt en betydelig stigning i budgetudgifterne i reformens fżrste gennemfżrelsesr. 
This resulted, as anticipated, in a significant increase in budgetary expenditure as of the first year of implementation of the reform.
Denne udgiftsstigning blev imidlertid hżjere end beregnet, dvs. at de faktiske udgifter steg r for r. Endvidere 
The increase in expenditure, was, however, higher than forecast, i.e. actual expenditure has turned out to be higher each year. Fur-
C 192/28 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 8.7.1999 havde man forventet, at udgifterne ville falde i 1997, men det skete ikke. 
C 192/28 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.7.1999 thermore, the forecast drop in expenditure for 1997 did not take place.
Selv om lagrene voksede i 1996-1997 efter overgangsperioden, og selv om udgifterne til eksportrestitutioner żgedes i samme periode, har reformen stadig haft betydning. 
The fact that stocks and export refunds reappeared in 1996 to 1997, following the transitional period, does not reduce the significance of the reform.
Disse forhold er kun et tegn p, at reformen er en lżbende proces, og at der bżr tržffes korrigerende foranstaltninger til at f afhjulpet de konstaterede svagheder. 
It merely demonstrates that the reform is an ongoing process and corrective measures should be taken to remedy the weaknesses identified.
I Agenda 2000 foresls det, at interventionspriserne nedsžttes yderligere Ń en sdan foranstaltning skal ifżlge forslaget forebygge risikoen for, at lagrene atter vokser, og at udgifterne til eksportrestitutioner igen żges. 
Agenda 2000 proposes a further reduction in intervention prices as a measure to remove the risks connected with the recurrence of increasing stocks and export refunds.
Det var ikke muligt at evaluere, hvor effektivt jordudtagningsordningen havde fungeret, fordi jordudtagningssatserne mtte nedsžttes vžsentligt efter overgangsperioden p grund af verdensomspžndende forsynings-mangel. 
The effectiveness of set-aside could not be properly evaluated because world-wide supply shortages called for considerable reductions in the set-aside rates after the transitional period.
For i det mindste p mellemlangt sigt at komme videre i den retning, der foresls i punkt 5.8, bżr Kommissionen sžtte undersżgelser i gang, der tager sigte p at evaluere, hvor stor konkurrencedygtighed Fžllesskabets kornsektor i realiteten har opnet gennem sdanne langvarige subsidieordninger. 
In order to move towards the approach suggested in paragraph 5.8 at least in the medium term, the Commission should initiate studies to evaluate the level of competitiveness actually achieved by the Community cereals sector following such protracted public support.
Der bżr tages effektivt fat p problemer som den potentielle risiko for arbejdslżshed, risikoen for at stżrre bedrifter opsplittes i mindre bedrifter, afvandringen fra landbruget og miljżskader. 
The potential risks of unemployment, the segmentation and abandonment of land, environmental damage, etc. should be addressed by effective means, such as integrated rural development aid.
Der lžgges ikke tilstržkkelig vžgt p foranstaltninger til forbedring af konkurrencedygtigheden gennem strukturforanstaltninger, som ogs er i overensstemmelse med WTO-aftalerne (green box). I forbindelse med reformen har man i nogen grad forsżmt forbrugernes interesser. 
On the other hand, inadequate reference is made to measures for improving competitiveness by means of structural measures that also comply with the WTO Agreements (green box). Consumer interests are somewhat neglected in the reform process.
Skatteyderne skal bžre en tungere byrde, men det betyder ikke, at de endelige forbrugerpriser falder vžsentligt. 
Taxpayers bear an increased burden, which is not followed by any significant reduction in final consumer prices.
Vedtaget af Revisionsretten i Luxembourg p mżdet den 6. maj 1999. 
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 6 May 1999.
P Revisionsrettens vegne Jan O. KARLSSON Formand I dennes fravžr undertegnet af Bernhard FRIEDMANN Fungerende formand 
For the Court of Auditors In the absence of Jan O. KARLSSON President of the Court Bernhard FRIEDMANN Acting President
8.7.1999 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende BILAG 1 C 192/29 EUROPEAN UNION Average cereal area per cereal holding (ha) in 1993 (Austria/Finland/Sweden 1995) <=5ha 5-10ha 10-20ha 20-40ha >40ha DAT A PROCESSING: GISVI and VI.A.1 CARTOGRAPHY: EC-GISVI - 06/97 SOURCE: EUROSTAT SE08 FI15 FI14 ES11 PT11 PT12 PT13 PT14 PT15 ES13 ES41 ES3 ES42 FR62 ES51 IT53 IT52 0 150 IE 750 km SE07 SE06 FI12 FI11 ES43 ES63 ES12 ES61 UKB UK1 ES24 ES52 ES62 IT6 IT72 IT8 ITA UKA YORKSHIRE AND HUMBERSIDE UK8 DEF MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN UK9 UK6 FR52 ES21 ES23 ES22 EASTMIDLANDS UK7 EAST ANGLIA NL1 NL3 NL2 NL4 DE5 DE6 DE9 DE3 BRANDENBURG SOUTH EAST (UK) FR23 FR25 DEA SACHSEN-ANHALT SACHSEN THUERINGEN FR51 FR24 FR53 FR63 IT312 IT2 IT31 IT33 IT32 FR61 FR72 FR81 ES53 FR71 FR82 IT12 IT11 IT13 FR83 ITB IT4 IT51 FR3 FR22 BE1 BE3 DE7 DEB DEC DE2 FR42 AT1 ILE DE FRANCE FR21 LU FR41 FR43 DE1 BE2 FR26 AT3 IT311 AT2 IT71 DK SE04 SE05 SE01 SE02 SE03 FI2 IT92 IT93 GR41 IT91 GR13 GR21 GR14 FI13 GR22 GR3 GR25 GR23 GR12 GR24 GR11 GR43 GR42 
8.7.1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities ANNEX 1 C 192/29 EUROPEAN UNION Average cereal area per cereal holding (ha) in 1993 (Austria/Finland/Sweden 1995) <=5ha 5-10ha 10-20ha 20-40ha >40ha DAT A PROCESSING: GISVI and VI.A.1 CARTOGRAPHY: EC-GISVI - 06/97 SOURCE: EUROSTAT SE08 FI15 FI14 ES11 PT11 PT12 PT13 PT14 PT15 ES13 ES41 ES3 ES42 FR62 ES51 IT53 IT52 0 150 IE 750 km SE07 SE06 FI12 FI11 ES43 ES63 ES12 ES61 UKB UK1 ES24 ES52 ES62 IT6 IT72 IT8 ITA UKA YORKSHIRE AND HUMBERSIDE UK8 DEF MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN UK9 UK6 FR52 ES21 ES23 ES22 EASTMIDLANDS UK7 EAST ANGLIA NL1 NL3 NL2 NL4 DE5 DE6 DE9 DE3 BRANDENBURG SOUTH EAST (UK) FR23 FR25 DEA SACHSEN-ANHALT SACHSEN THUERINGEN FR51 FR24 FR53 FR63 IT312 IT2 IT31 IT33 IT32 FR61 FR72 FR81 ES53 FR71 FR82 IT12 IT11 IT13 FR83 ITB IT4 IT51 FR3 FR22 BE1 BE3 DE7 DEB DEC DE2 FR42 AT1 ILE DE FRANCE FR21 LU FR41 FR43 DE1 BE2 FR26 AT3 IT311 AT2 IT71 DK SE04 SE05 SE01 SE02 SE03 FI2 IT92 IT93 GR41 IT91 GR13 GR21 GR14 FI13 GR22 GR3 GR25 GR23 GR12 GR24 GR11 GR43 GR42
C 192/30 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende BILAG 2 8.7.1999 EUROPEAN UNION Regional cereal production ES11 PT11 PT12 PT13 PT14 PT15 ES13 ES41 ES3 ES42 FR62 ES51 IT53 IT52 IT71 GR11 in % of EU-15 (average 3 most recent years available) <=0.5% 0.5-1.0% 1.0-2.0% 2.0-3.0% >3.0% DAT A PROCESSING: GISVI and VI.A.1 CARTOGRAPHY: EC-GISVI - 06/97 SOURCE: EUROSTAT SE08 FI15 FI14 0 150 IE 750 km SE07 SE06 FI12 FI11 ES43 ES63 ES12 ES61 UKB UK1 DANMARK DEF DE6 DE5 NIEDERSACHSEN SE04 DE8 DE3 DE4 DED UK9 UK6 FR52 ES21 ES23 ES22 UK4 FR23 FR25 NL3 NL2 NL4 DEA DEB DEC DEE DEG BAYERN ES24 ES52 ES62 IT6 IT72 IT8 ITA UKA UK2 UK8 UK3 UK7 UK5 SE03 FR51 AT31 AT33 AT32 AT22 AT11 IT92 IT93 FR53 FR63 IT311 IT312 FR61 FR72 FR81 ES53 FR71 FR82 IT12 IT11 IT13 FR83 ITB IT4 IT51 FR1 CENTRE FR21 FR26 LU FR41 FR43 DE1 FR42 AT12 AT13 FR3 FR22 BE1 BE3 DE7 BE2 NL1 AT34 IT2 AT21 IT33 IT32 SE05 SE01 SE02 FI2 IT91 GR13 GR21 GR14 FI13 GR22 GR3 GR25 GR23 GR12 GR24 GR41 GR43 GR42 
C 192/30 EN Official Journal of the European Communities ANNEX 2 8.7.1999 EUROPEAN UNION Regional cereal production ES11 PT11 PT12 PT13 PT14 PT15 ES13 ES41 ES3 ES42 FR62 ES51 IT53 IT52 IT71 GR11 in % of EU-15 (average 3 most recent years available) <=0.5% 0.5-1.0% 1.0-2.0% 2.0-3.0% >3.0% DAT A PROCESSING: GISVI and VI.A.1 CARTOGRAPHY: EC-GISVI - 06/97 SOURCE: EUROSTAT SE08 FI15 FI14 0 150 IE 750 km SE07 SE06 FI12 FI11 ES43 ES63 ES12 ES61 UKB UK1 DANMARK DEF DE6 DE5 NIEDERSACHSEN SE04 DE8 DE3 DE4 DED UK9 UK6 FR52 ES21 ES23 ES22 UK4 FR23 FR25 NL3 NL2 NL4 DEA DEB DEC DEE DEG BAYERN ES24 ES52 ES62 IT6 IT72 IT8 ITA UKA UK2 UK8 UK3 UK7 UK5 SE03 FR51 AT31 AT33 AT32 AT22 AT11 IT92 IT93 FR53 FR63 IT311 IT312 FR61 FR72 FR81 ES53 FR71 FR82 IT12 IT11 IT13 FR83 ITB IT4 IT51 FR1 CENTRE FR21 FR26 LU FR41 FR43 DE1 FR42 AT12 AT13 FR3 FR22 BE1 BE3 DE7 BE2 NL1 AT34 IT2 AT21 IT33 IT32 SE05 SE01 SE02 FI2 IT91 GR13 GR21 GR14 FI13 GR22 GR3 GR25 GR23 GR12 GR24 GR41 GR43 GR42
8.7.1999 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende KOMMISSIONENS SVAR RESUM Landbrugsreformen i 1992 sigtede mod at gżre korn dyrket i Fžllesskabet mere konkurrencedygtigt bde i Fžllesskabet og p verdensmarkedet. 
8.7.1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES SUMMARY The 1992 reform of the CAP aimed to render cereals grown in the Community more competitive both internally in the Community and on the world market.
I 1980Őerne og begyndelsen af 1990Őerne mistede korn dyrket i Fžllesskabet konstant markedsandel p det interne marked for dyrefoder til fordel for importerede kornsubstitutter. 
During the 1980s and early 1990s, home-grown cereals continuously lost market share on the internal market for animal feed to the benefit of imported cereals substitutes.
En fortsžttelse af disse tendenser i perioden 1993/94-1995/96 ville have resulteret i et fald i mžngden af korn anvendt til dyrefoder p ca. 5-7 mio. ton. 
A simple continuation of past trends over the 1993/1994 to 1995/1996 period would have led to a reduction of cereals uptake in animal feed of some 5 to 7 million tonnes.
P dette tidspunkt var det ogs klart, at de igangvžrende GATT-forhandlinger ville resultere i indskržnkninger med hensyn til mžngden af korn, der kunne eksporteres med eksportstżtte. 
At the time it was also clear that the on-going GATT negotiations would result in restrictions on the quantities of cereals which could be exported with export refunds.
Reformen genoprettede markedsbalancen for korn. 
The reform, by the end of the transitional period, successfully re-established the market balance for cereals.
Det interne forbrug af korn dyrket i Fžllesskabet voksede og interventionslagrene forsvandt inden de inden for de seneste mneder er begyndt at vokse igen. 
The internal consumption of Community-grown cereals increased and intervention stocks disappeared, although they have been starting to build up again in recent months.
Kommissionen erkendte imidlertid i sine Agenda 2000-forslag, at der er behov for at udbygge 1992-reformen ved at foresl en yderligere nedskžring p 20 % i de institutionelle kornpriser for at forbedre EUŐs konkurrenceevne p de interne og eksterne markeder. 
However, the Commission in its Agenda 2000 proposals recognised the need to build on the 1992 reform by proposing an additional reduction of 20 % in institutional cereal prices, in order to improve the UnionŐs competitiveness on internal and external markets.
Det Europžiske Rd i Berlin konkluderede, at prisnedsžttelsen skulle vžre p 15 % i produktionsrene 2000/01 og 2001/02 (7,5 % om ret), og at der skulle tržffes afgżrelse om en yderligere nedsžttelse af interventionsprisen, som skulle gžlde fra 2002/03 og frem afhžngigt af udviklingen p markedet. 
The Berlin European Council concluded that the price cut should be 15 % over the marketing years 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 (7,5 % per year) and that a decision on a further reduction in the intervention price to be applied from 2002/2003 onwards should be taken in the light of market developments.
Den kombinerede effekt af prisnedsžttelser og braklžgning skulle gżre det muligt for EU at opretholde markedsbalancen. 
The combined effect of price cuts and set-aside should allow the Union to maintain market balance.
Retten gentager, hvad den tidligere har gjort opmžrksom p (rsberetningen fra 1996), at den direkte stżtte, der blev indfżrt med 1992-reformen, faktisk overkompenserer kornproducenterne. 
The Court repeats its earlier findings (Annual Report 1996) that the direct aids introduced by the 1992 reform actually over-compensated cereal growers.
Kommissionen accepterede dette og foreslog i 1996 at nedsžtte de godtgżrelser, der blev udbetalt til landmžndene. 
This was acknowledged by the Commission, which in 1996 proposed to reduce the compensation paid to farmers.
Hverken Rdet eller Europa-Parlamentet godkendte imidlertid forslaget. 
However, neither the Council nor the European Parliament endorsed the proposal.
Agenda 2000 tager fat p dette problem ved kun at give delvis kompensation for prisnedsžttelse. 
Agenda 2000 addresses this by offering only a partial compensation for the price reduction.
Som fżlge af en beslutning truffet af Det Europžiske Rd giver enhver stigning i arealstżtten i tilfžlde af en yderligere nedsžttelse af interventionsprisen samme grad af kompensation som i 2000/01 og 2001/02. 
Following the European CouncilŐs decision, in case of a further reduction in intervention price, any increase in area payments will provide the same degree of compensation as in 2000/2001 and 2001/2002.
En differentiering af godtgżrelsen afhžngigt af bedriftens stżrrelse var en del af det oprindelige 1992-reformforslag og var ogs med i Agenda 2000-forslagene, men ingen af disse forslag blev godkendt af Rdet. 
A differentiation of compensation payments according to farm size was part of the initial 1992 reform proposal and was also included in the Agenda 2000 proposals, but neither of these proposals has been accepted by the Council.
Retten konstaterer, at hverken prisnedsžttelserne fra den fżrste reform eller i henhold til Agenda 2000 ser ud til at vžre til fordel for den endelige forbruger. 
The Court states that neither the price reductions from the first reform, nor those in Agenda 2000, can be shown to benefit the final consumer.
Selv om det ikke er nogen let opgave at mle effekten p forbrugerpriserne, da priserne er pvirkede af en ržkke faktorer, har Kommissionen undersżgt pristransmissionen i andre sektorer og er net til den konklusion, at der generelt set er en positiv effekt. 
Even though measuring the effect on consumer prices is not an easy task as prices are influenced by a number of factors, the Commission has studied price transmission in other sectors and reached the conclusion that in general terms there is a positive effect.