natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Eftersom Kommissionen tager hensyn til de behov, medlemsstaterne giver udtryk for, sikrer den politiske ramme, at stżtten til medlemsstaterne har fokus p relevante omrder. 
As the Commission takes account of the needs expressed by Member States, the policy framework focuses support for Member States on relevant areas.
I vores rundspżrge mente de fleste respondenter, at Kommissionens stżtte til medlemsstaterne p de forskellige omrder var relevant (jf. figur 2). 
Our survey confirmed that most respondents felt the CommissionŐs support for Member States in the various areas was relevant (see Figure 2).
Andelen varierede mellem 64 % og 80 %, alt efter omrde. 
The percentage varied between 64 % and 80 %, depending on the area.
Bilaget viser, hvordan Kommissionen ikke kun i den politiske ramme mlrettede sin stżtte mod relevante omrder, men ogs brugte de forskellige EU-fonde til at gennemfżre aktioner, der faktisk adresserer disse omrder i praksis. 
The Annex shows how the Commission not only targeted relevant areas in its policy framework, but also applied the various EU funds to carry out actions which actually address those areas in practice.
Der var imidlertid undtagelser, hvor behovene ikke blev adresseret tilstržkkeligt: a) De belgiske myndigheder fortalte os, at spżrgsmlet om de traditionelle medier (tv, radio og pressen) ikke var behandlet tilstržkkeligt i den politiske ramme. 
However, there were exceptions where needs were not sufficiently addressed: The Belgian authorities informed us that the issue of mainstream media (television, radio and the press) was insufficiently addressed in the policy framework.
De ans det for vigtigt at inkludere dette spżrgsml i den politiske ramme for at fremme overvejelser om mediernes rolle, ikke kun med hensyn til at tilskynde mennesker til at forlade Europa for at kžmpe i Syrien, men ogs med hensyn til at bidrage til en polarisering af samfundet, som kan skabe spžndinger, der fżrer til radikalisering % respondenter 
They considered it important to include this issue in the policy framework in order to facilitate reflection on the mediaŐs role not only in encouraging people to leave Europe to fight in Syria but also in contributing to polarisation in society, which could create tensions leading to radicalisation.
b) Behovet for at udvikle exitstrategier (jf. tekstboks 5) blev ikke behandlet tilfredsstillende i praksis. 
The need to develop exit strategies (see Box 5) was not sufficiently addressed in practice.
I 2014 ivžrksatte Kommissionen en indkaldelse af forslag til projekter, der skulle finansieres af Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed - Politi. 
In 2014, the Commission launched a call for proposals for projects to be financed by the ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ.
Denne indkaldelse skulle adressere to prioriteter: forebyggelse af radikalisering og udvikling af exitstrategier. 
This call aimed to address two priorities: preventing radicalisation and developing exit strategies.
Det var dog kun projekter vedrżrende det fżrste ml om forebyggelse af radikalisering, der blev finansieret, fordi de fik en hżjere placering i bedżmmelsen. 
However, only projects addressing the first objective of preventing radicalisation were funded because they received a higher ranking.
De rlige arbejdsprogrammer for 2015 og 2016 for Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed - Politi indeholdt ingen yderligere indkaldelser af forslag til udvikling af programmer om exitstrategier. 
ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ included no further calls for proposals to develop programmes on exit strategies.
Stżtten er udformet sdan, at medlemsstaterne har fordel af, at der gżres en indsats p europžisk niveau 20. 
Support is designed to bring benefits to Member States from acting at European level 20.
Kommissionen tager ikke kun sigte p relevante omrder, men gżr ogs brug af EU-midler og -vžrktżjer til at give konkret stżtte, som er udformet sdan, at medlemsstaterne har gavn af, at der gżres en indsats p europžisk niveau. 
The Commission not only targets relevant areas, but also makes use of EU funds and tools to deliver concrete support for Member States which is designed to bring benefits from acting at European level.
Eksempler p dette er RAN (jf. tekstboks 1), EU's internetforum, det europžiske strategiske kommunikationsnet og EU IRU i Europol (jf. tekstboks 2). 
Examples of this support include the RAN (see Box 1), the EU Internet Forum, the European Strategic Communications Network and the EU IRU at Europol (see Box 2).
Disse initiativer, som specifikt er rettet mod radikalisering, fremmer samarbejde mellem medlemsstaterne og ville slet ikke blive gennemfżrt - eller ikke blive gennemfżrt lige s effektivt - hvis medlemsstaterne handlede hver for sig. 
These initiatives, which specifically target radicalisation, promote cooperation between Member States and would not be implemented at all - or not as efficiently - by Member States acting individually.
De nationale programmer under Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed - Politi, der forvaltes af medlemsstaterne, er ogs udformet med henblik p at opn fordele ved en indsats p europžisk niveau, idet de nationale standarder hžves for at mindske forskelle og fremme synergier mellem medlemsstaterne. 
The ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ national programmes managed by Member States are also designed to bring benefits from acting at European level by raising national standards to reduce disparities and by stimulating synergies between Member States.
18 medlemsstater havde specifikke aktioner til bekžmpelse af radikalisering i deres nationale programmer. 
18 Member States included specific actions to tackle radicalisation in their national programmes.
F.eks. finansierede Belgien projekter, der skulle żge bevidstheden om radikalisering i fžngsler, stżtte et netvžrk for bistand til srbare familier og finansiere mobile tvžrfaglige grupper til at analysere de lokale myndigheders behov og foresl lokale strategier. 
Belgium, for example, financed projects to increase radicalisation awareness in prisons, support a network for assisting vulnerable families, and fund mobile multidisciplinary teams to analyse the needs of local authorities and propose local strategies.
Kommissionen fremmer synergier, men koordineringen kan forbedres 22. 
The Commission fosters synergies, but coordination could be improved 22.
Kommissionen er i stigende grad aktiv med hensyn til at stżtte medlemsstaternes bekžmpelse af radikalisering. 
The Commission is increasingly active in supporting Member States in addressing radicalisation.
14 af de 15 respondenter i vores spżrgeundersżgelse (jf. punkt 14) mente, at Kommissionen var mere aktiv nu end for fem r siden. 
14 out of the 15 respondents to our survey (see paragraph 14) felt that the Commission was more active now than five years ago.
Mangfoldigheden 18 i Kommissionens aktioner, som involverer forskellige fonde forvaltet af otte generaldirektorater og er spredt over forskellige politikomrder (jf. punkt 5), kržver en effektiv koordinering. 
The variety of the CommissionŐs actions, which involve different funds managed by eight directorates-general, and which are spread across different policy areas (see paragraph 5), requires effective coordination.
Vi undersżgte derfor, om Kommissionen koordinerer sine aktioner p en sdan mde, at synergierne maksimeres. 
We therefore examined whether the Commission coordinates its actions in such a way as to maximise synergies.
Vi gennemgik procedurerne for hżring af de forskellige generaldirektorater, fżr der ydes EU-stżtte. 
We reviewed the procedures for consulting the various directorates-general before EU funding is granted.
For at identificere synergier gennemgik vi ogs de vigtigste aktioner, der finansieres af forskellige EU-fonde, og undersżgte, om Kommissionen har det samlede overblik over alle sin aktioner til bekžmpelse af radikalisering, som er nżdvendigt for at udnytte de potentielle synergier optimalt. 
We also reviewed the main actions financed by different EU funds in order to identify synergies, and examined whether the Commission has the comprehensive overview of all its counter-radicalisation actions which is needed to make 17 the most of potential synergies.
Navnlig undersżgte vi, om Kommissionen gjorde fuld brug af RAN, f.eks. til at formidle resultaterne af EU-finansierede aktioner. 
In particular, we checked whether the Commission made full use of the RAN, for example to disseminate the results of EU-funded actions.
Kommissionen fremmer synergier 23. 
The Commission fosters synergies 23.
Bilaget viser, at Kommissionen med forskellige aktioner kan adressere de samme emner. 
The Annex shows different Commission actions can address similar issues.
Eftersom Kommissionen i stigende grad er aktiv p dette omrde, er der muligheder for synergier, navnlig hvor aktioner krydser hinanden. 
Since the Commission is increasingly active in this area, there are opportunities for synergies, particularly where actions intersect.
Eksempler p dette er: a) Midler, der under Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed - Politi ydes til medlemsstaterne med henblik p uddannelse af lžrere, kunne adressere de samme emner som projekter under Erasmus+ b) Projekter til uddannelse og oplysning af fžngselspersonale, der finansieres af programmet for retlige anliggender, kunne adressere de samme emner som projekter under Erasmus+ eller Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed - Politi. 
Examples of this are: ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ funds provided to Member States for training teachers could address similar issues to Erasmus+ projects; projects funded by the Justice Programme to train and raise awareness of prison staff could address similar issues to Erasmus+ or ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ projects.
Kommissionen har en ržkke procedurer til at lette koordineringen med det forml at maksimere synergier og undg dobbelt stżtte (jf. tekstboks 6). 
The Commission has a number of procedures to facilitate coordination, the aim being to maximise synergies and avoid duplication of support (see Box 6).
19 Tekstboks 6 - Eksempler p Kommissionens procedurer til at lette koordineringen Ved skaldte tvžrtjenstlige hżringer arbejder forskellige generaldirektorater sammen om at godkende rlige arbejdsprogrammer, som beskriver de aktioner, der planlžgges gennemfżrt med 20 EU-midler. 
18 Box 6 - Examples of Commission procedures to facilitate coordination Through the process referred to as inter-service consultation, various directorates-general work together to approve annual work programmes which set out the actions planned for EU funds.
Nogle rlige arbejdsprogrammer kržver, at projekterne supplerer andre aktioner. 
Some annual work programmes require projects to complement other actions.
Eksempler: - Det rlige arbejdsprogram 2016 for programmet for retlige anliggender fastsatte, at aktionerne skulle sikre sammenhžng, komplementaritet og synergi med aktioner, der stżttes af andre EU-fonde, herunder Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed Ń Politi, Erasmus+ og Horisont 2020 - Det rlige arbejdsprogram for 2016 for de aktioner under Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed - Politi, der forvaltes centralt af Kommissionen, fastsatte, at projekterne skulle sikre komplementaritet med Europols aktiviteter. 
For example: - the 2016 annual work programme for the Justice Programme required actions to ensure consistency, complementarity and synergies with actions supported by other EU funds, including the ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ, Erasmus+ and Horizon 2020; - the 2016 annual work programme for ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ actions managed centrally by the Commission required projects to ensure complementarity with Europol activities.
Indkaldelser af forslag (hvor man opfordrer til indsendelse af ansżgninger om projektfinansiering) kan fastsžtte, at ansżgerne skal dokumentere, at de ikke vil duplikere eksisterende initiativer. 
Calls for proposals (the procedure for inviting applications for project funding) may require applicants to show that they will not duplicate existing initiatives.
F.eks. skulle ansżgerne i forbindelse med en indkaldelse af forslag i 2014 vedrżrende forebyggelse af radikalisering under Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed - Politi dokumentere, at deres forslag ikke duplikerede eksisterende arbejde, projekter og initiativer, herunder RAN's aktiviteter. 
For example, the 2014 ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ call for proposals on preventing radicalisation required applicants to demonstrate that proposals do not duplicate existing work, projects and initiatives, including the activities of the RAN.
Vi undersżgte aktioner p forskellige omrder finansieret af forskellige fonde. 
We examined actions in different areas financed by different funds.
Vi konstaterede, at Kommissionens koordinering har resulteret i synergier mellem dens aktioner. 
We found that Commission coordination has resulted in synergies between its actions.
F.eks. bruges RAN til at formidle resultaterne af andre EU-finansierede projekter (jf. tekstboks 7). 
The RAN, for example, is used to disseminate the results of other EU-funded projects (see Box 7).
Flere eksempler gives i figur 3. 
Further examples are given in Figure 3.
Den viser en ržkke aktioner, som finansieres af tre EU-fonde, og angiver, at der findes synergier bde i og mellem fondene. 
This shows several actions funded by three EU funds and demonstrates that synergies exist both within and between funds.
F.eks. brugte Kommissionen det 7. forskningsrammeprogram (det forskningsprogram, der l fżr Horisont 2020) til at finansiere forskningsprojektet IMPACT10, som udviklede vžrktżjer til evaluering af aktioner til bekžmpelse af radikalisering. 
For example, the Commission used the 7th Framework Programme (the research programme which preceded Horizon 2020) to fund the IMPACT10 research project which developed tools for evaluating radicalisation actions.
Disse vžrktżjer blev benyttet af STRESAVIORA-projektet, der blev finansieret af Fonden for Intern Sikkerhed - Politi. Dette projekt blev derefter udvidet og udbredt gennem et projekt finansieret af Erasmus+. 
These tools were used by the STRESAVIORA project funded by the ŇInternal Security Fund Đ Police.Ó This project was then scaled up and disseminated by a project financed by Erasmus+.
21 Tekstboks 7 - RAN-samlingen - et eksempel p synergi mellem EU-finansierede projekter RAN's samling af tilgange og praksis, som er blevet regelmžssig ajourfżrt siden 2014, indeholder nžrmere oplysninger om EU-baserede projekter vedrżrende bekžmpelse af radikalisering, som kan overfżres til andre sammenhžnge. 
19 Box 7 - The RAN Collection - an example of synergy between EU-funded projects The RAN Collection of Approaches and Practices, which has been regularly updated since 2014, contains details of radicalisation projects based in the EU which are transferable to other contexts.
Projekterne er blevet forelagt til peer review p et RAN-arbejdsgruppemżde og godkendt af RAN's styringsgruppe. 
The projects have been presented in a RAN Working Group meeting for peer review and approved by the RAN Steering Committee.
Der er 108 praksis i RAN-samlingen, herunder 16 EU-finansierede projekter. 
There are 108 practices in the RAN Collection, including 16 EU-funded projects.
STRESAVIORA) Projekterne er i RAN-samlingen CSEP uddanner interessenter fra civilsamfundet i at fremstille modfortžllinger, s de er bedre forberedt til deltagelse i en indkaldelse af forslag RAN og IMPACT leverer fžlles uddannelse. Forskningsprojekterne er i RAN-samlingen Forskningsprojekter (f.eks. VOX-Pol, IMPACT) VOX-Pol fremlžgger rapporter om onlineterrorisme p 2016-mżdet i EUŐs internetforum Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) RANŐs dokument om modfortžllinger anvendes af EUŐs internetforum Projekter EUŐs internetforum RAN deler sine erfaringer med CSEP Stżtte Ekspertise Det europžiske strategiske kommunikationsnet (ESCN) Programmet om styrkelse af civilsamfundet (CSEP) Indkaldelse af forslag vedrżrende social inklusion under Erasmus+ udvider projekterne og udbreder gode praksis Kilde: Revisionsretten. 
Figure 3 - Examples of synergies between Commission actions addressing radicalisation 20 Horizon 2020 (previously FP7) actions to develop knowledge and practices Erasmus+ actions to promote inclusive and resilient societies Internal Security Fund - Police (previously ISEC) actions to counter terrorist propaganda Projects (e.g. STRESAVIORA) Projects are in RAN Collection RAN and IMPACT deliver joint training; Research projects are in RAN Collection Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) RAN issue paper on counter-narratives feeds into EU Internet Forum Erasmus+ social inclusion call scales up and disseminates good practices To assess its results STRESAVIORA uses the evaluation tool developed by the IMPACT project CSEP trains civil society stakeholders to produce counter-narratives so they are better prepared to apply for a call for proposals Research projects (e.g. VOX-Pol, IMPACT) VOX-Pol presents reports on online terrorism to 2016 EU Internet Forum RAN feeds the CSEP with its experiences Projects EU Internet Forum Support Expertise European Strategic Communications Network (ESCN) Civil Society Empowerment Programme (CSEP) Source: ECA.
Der er nogle mangler i koordineringen 26. 
There are some coordination shortfalls 26.
Kommissionen er i stand til at identificere og udnytte mange forbindelser mellem sine aktioner, men der er mangler i den samlede koordinering: a) Forskellige generaldirektorater er ansvarlige for at planlžgge og rapportere om anvendelsen af forskellige EU-fonde (jf. bilaget). 
Although the Commission is able to identify and exploit many connections between actions, there are shortfalls in overall coordination: Different directorates-general are responsible for planning for and reporting on different EU funds (see Annex).
F.eks. er GD for Uddannelse, Unge, Idržt og Kultur ansvarligt for koordineringen af projekter, der finansieres af Erasmus+, og GD for Retlige Anliggender og Forbrugere er ansvarligt for koordineringen af projekter, der finansieres af programmet for retlige anliggender. 
For example, DG Education and Culture is responsible for coordinating projects financed by Erasmus+, and DG Justice and Consumers is responsible for coordinating projects financed by the Justice Programme.
GD for Migration og Indre Anliggender er det ledende generaldirektorat i forbindelse med udviklingen af Kommissionens politiske ramme og overvgningen af dens gennemfżrelse11. 
DG Migration and Home Affairs is the lead directorate-general for developing the CommissionŐs policy framework and monitoring its implementation11.
Indtil 2017 var der imidlertid ingen ramme for koordinering af samtlige EU-aktioner til bekžmpelse af radikalisering, som gżr det muligt at identificere potentielle synergier mellem fondene b) Fżrst i 2017 foretog GD for Migration og Indre Anliggender en kortlžgning af de EU-finansierede projekter til bekžmpelse af radikalisering. 
However, until 2017 there was no framework for coordinating all EU actions addressing radicalisation in order to identify potential synergies between funds. It was only in 2017 that DG Migration and Home Affairs carried out a mapping of EU-funded projects addressing radicalisation.
Det betżd, at Kommissionen indtil da ikke havde en konsolideret liste over de aktioner til bekžmpelse af radikalisering, der blev finansieret af de forskellige EU-fonde. 
This meant that until then the Commission did not have a consolidated list of counter-radicalisation actions financed by the different EU funds.
Desuden var denne kortlžgning begržnset til aktioner, der blev forvaltet centralt af Kommissionen, og omfattede ikke aktioner, der blev forvaltet af medlemsstaterne i deres nationale programmer. 
Even then, this mapping process was limited to actions managed centrally by the Commission and did not include those managed by Member States in their national programmes.
Under samtalerne med os ppegede EU IRU i Europol og det europžiske strategiske kommunikationsnet muligheder for bedre koordinering af EU-finansierede aktioner: a) Europol mente, at der kunne opns stżrre synergi ved at koordinere timingen og indholdet af modfortžllingskampagner med fjernelsen af terrorrelateret materiale p internettet b) Det europžiske strategiske kommunikationsnet anfżrte, at det kunne drage nytte af at have adgang til Europols analyse af tendenserne inden for terrorpropaganda (i det omfang dette er tilladt i henhold til den administrative aftale mellem Kommissionen og Europol) og af stżrre inddragelse i VOX-Pol12, et EU-finansieret forskningsprojekt. 
Interviews with the EU IRU at Europol and the European Strategic Communications Network identified opportunities for better coordination between EU-funded actions: Europol suggested that there was an opportunity for greater synergy by coordinating the timing and content of counter-narrative campaigns with the removal of terrorist material from the internet; the European Strategic Communications Network suggested it would benefit from access to EuropolŐs analysis of trends in terrorist propaganda (to the extent this is For example, by means of monthly reports since October 2016 on progress towards an effective and genuine Security Union, and through the July 2017 Comprehensive Assessment of EU Security Policy.
Disse oplysninger ville sžtte det i stand til at give regeringerne bedre rd om udvikling af kommunikationsstrategier og udarbejdelse af modfortžllingskampagner. 
This information would enable it to provide governments with better advice on developing communication strategies and producing counter-narrative campaigns.
RAN's potentiale udnyttes ikke fuldt ud 28. 
The RAN is not used to its full potential 28.
RAN skaber nyttige fordele ved en indsats p europžisk niveau, men vi konstaterede, at mervžrdien ikke maksimeres i praksis13: a) RAN kunne levere mere praktiske output, f.eks. ved at analysere praksis i medlemsstaterne (eksempelvis ved hjžlp af flere kontrolbesżg) og udarbejde en detaljeret sammenlignende oversigt over de tilgange, der anvendes i de enkelte medlemsstater. 
Although the RAN brings useful benefits from acting at European level, we found that this added value is not maximised in practice13: The RAN could produce more practical outputs, for example by analysing practices in Member States (e.g. by means of more on-site visits) and drawing up a detailed comparative inventory of the approaches implemented in each Member State.
2014-meddelelsen "Forebyggelse af radikalisering, der kan munde ud i terrorisme og voldelig ekstremisme" omtaler RAN-samlingen - der blev offentliggjort for fżrste gang i 2014 - som en oversigt over bedste praksis. 
The 2014 ŇCommunication on preventing radicalisation to terrorismÓ refers to the RAN Collection - first published in 2014 - as a repository of best practices.
Ifżlge indledningen til RAN-samlingen skal de inkluderede praksis imidlertid kun tjene til orientering og inspiration. 
However, the introduction to the RAN Collection states that the practices included are only meant to be informative and inspiring.
Vi konstaterede ogs, at RAN-samlingens beskrivelser ikke giver tilstržkkelige oplysninger om, hvordan projekterne blev finansieret, s interesserede parter kan VOX-Pol-projektet har til forml at skabe netvžrk for forskningsaktiviteter om ekstremisme p internettet med henblik p udarbejdelse af mere velfunderede politiske dagsordener p nationalt, europžisk og internationalt plan. 
Also, we found that entries in the RAN Collection do not have sufficient information on how the project was financed to allow interested parties to identify potential sources of EU funding for the types of project they are considering.
Dette bekržftes af vores spżrgeundersżgelse. 
This is corroborated by our survey.
8 af de 13 respondenter, der gav udtryk for en holdning (62 %), mente, at RAN-tilgangen kunne tilfżre mere vžrdi. 
8 out of 13 (62 %) survey respondents who expressed an opinion felt that the RAN approach could add more value.
24 12 13 
22 12 13