natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Interventionslagrene kan vokse igen i fremtiden, hvis der opstr en situation med lave producentpriser, hvilket vil medfżre, at en stżrre del af interventionsprodukterne anvendes som forsyninger til ordningen. 
Intervention stocks may buildup again in future, in a situation of low producer prices, leading to a more important share of intervention goods in sourcing the scheme.
Faktisk vokser interventionslagrene for visse produkter p nuvžrende tidspunkt igen. 
In fact, intervention stocks for certain products are currently increasing again.
Fżdevarehjžlpen til socialt drligt stillede opretholder en stžrk forbindelse til den fžlles landbrugspolitik, s lžnge den bidrager til opfyldelsen af mlene for landbrugspolitikken, navnlig vedrżrende markedsstabilisering. 
The food aid to deprived persons measure keeps a strong link with the CAP as long as it contributes to fulfil the objectives of this policy in particular in the area of market stabilisation.
Med Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning forsżger man at sikre, at de uddelte produkter ikke begržnses til produkter, der kan gżres til genstand for interventionsopkżb. 
The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation seeks to remove the confinement of distributed products to those eligible for intervention.
Kommissionen żnsker ikke at foregribe resultatet af de politiske drżftelser, som nu er i gang efter fremlžggelsen af Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning. 
The Commission does not wish to pre-empt the outcome of the political discussions that are currently taking place following the submission of the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation.
Kommissionen vil gerne understrege, at et stort flertal af medlemsstaterne konsekvent stemmer for godkendelsen af rsplanerne. 
The Commission would like to underline that an overwhelming majority of Member States consistently vote in favour of the approval of the annual plans.
Ordningen har lige siden oprettelsen haft to komplementžre dimensioner, nemlig markedsstabilisering og et socialt sigte. 
Since its inception, the scheme has had a two-fold complementary dimension: market stabilisation and social.
Ordningens omkostningseffektivitet m vurderes ud fra, om den opfylder begge ml. 
The cost-efficiency of the scheme is to be assessed against the concurrent fulfilment of both objectives.
Den evaluering fra 1998, som Revisionsretten nžvner, blev foretaget af en uafhžngig konsulent. 
The 1998 evaluation study mentioned by the Court was elaborated by an independent consultant.
Kommissionens kvalitetskontrol af rapporten omfatter en ržkke kritiske bemžrkninger, navnlig vedrżrende metoden, analysens holdbarhed og resultaternes trovžrdighed. 
The Commission’s quality check of this report includes critical remarks related mainly to its methodology, the robustness of the analysis and the credibility of the results.
De forskellige citater, som Revisionsretten fremhžver, understreger ordningens sociale komponent uden dog at sžtte spżrgsmlstegn ved landbrugsdimensionen. 
The various quotes highlighted by the Court bring forward the social component of the scheme, without nevertheless calling into question its agricultural dimension.
Selv om ordningens sociale dimension anerkendes, vil Kommissionen gerne understrege, at forordning (EF) nr. 1234/2007 er en af de vigtigste forordninger for den fžlles landbrugspolitik med hjemmel i artikel 36 og 37 i traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europžiske Fžllesskab. 
Even if the social dimension of this scheme is duly recognised, the Commission would like to underline that Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 is a key Regulation of the Common Agricultural Policy, based on Articles 36 and 37 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Det fremgr af de regelmžssige mżder, som Kommissionen holder med medlemsstaternes myndigheder og velgżrende organisationer som led i forvaltningen af ordningen, at der generelt er stor tilfredshed p begge sider med den mde, hvorp hżringerne foregr p nationalt plan. 
It emerges from the regular meetings that the Commission holds with Member States’ authorities and charities as part of its management of the scheme, that there is generally a high level of satisfaction on both sides with the way consultations are conducted at national level.
Kommissionen er dog enig i, at der kan foretages forbedringer, og den har i den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning fra 2008, medtaget en ržkke forslag, der kan forbedre forbindelsen mellem ordningen og andre foranstaltninger p medlemsstatsplan, f.eks. gennem udarbejdelse af nationale programmer for uddeling af fżdevarer. 
The Commission agrees however that there is room for improvement and has included in the Impact Assessment accompanying the 2008 Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation suggestions to enhance the link between the scheme and other actions at Member State level, through for example the drawing-up of national food distribution programmes.
Disse programmer skal gennemfżres efter vedtagelsen af den nye rdsforordning. 
These would be implemented after the adoption of the new Council Regulation.
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 34. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 34.
ČPotentielle stżttemodtagereÇ og Čml-gruppeÇ er to forskellige begreber. Mens det fżrste er en statistisk indikator, som udelukkende anvendes ved beregningen af medlemsstaternes tildelinger, defineres den gruppe, som ordningen er rettet mod, p det relevante geografiske niveau af medlemsstaternes forvaltningsmyndigheder i samarbejde med de velgżrende organisationer (artikel 1, stk. 
The notions of ‘potential beneficiaries’ and ‘target population’ are different: while the former is a statistical indicator used exclusively for the calculation of Member States’ allocations, the population actually targeted is defined at the appropriate geographical level by Member States’ managing authorities in cooperation with charities (Article 1(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92).
I forbindelse med tildelingen af budgettet for ordningen for 2009 er der anvendt en ny metode, der kombinerer antallet af personer, som er Čtruet af fattigdomÇ, og BNI udtrykt i kżbekraftsparitet for hver medlemsstat. 
For the 2009 budget allocation of the plan, a new methodology has been used combining the number of people ‘at risk of poverty’ to the GNI per purchasing power parity for each Member State.
Dette beviser ogs, at antallet af personer, som er truet af fattigdom, ikke er lig med antallet af potentielle modtagere. 
This further proves that the number of people at risk of poverty is not a number of potential beneficiaries.
Det psts ikke, at foranstaltningen med fżdevarehjžlp i sig selv lżser problemet med fżdevareusikkerhed i EU. 
35–36. The food aid measure does not claim to solve by itself the question of food insecurity in the EU.
Den er et bidrag til lżsningen p et problem, som ikke blot kržver, at Fžllesskabet deltager, men ogs, at medlemsstaternes myndigheder p forskellige niveauer og civilsamfundet involveres. 
It is a contribution to the solution of a problem that requires not only the involvement of the Community but also the mobilisation of Member States’ authorities at various levels and of the civil society.
I den forbindelse er et af formlene med programmet at sikre en plidelig og stabil kilde til fżdevarer for de organisationer, som yder fżdevarehjžlp til de socialt drligst stillede. 
In this context, one of the aims of the programme is to secure a reliable and stable source of foodstuffs for the organisations providing food assistance to the most deprived persons.
Det anslede antal mltider, som leveres til stżttemodtagerne, er derfor ikke den bedste indikator for programmets virkning, selv om uddelingen af ca. 156 millioner mltider om ret m betragtes som meget vžsentlig. 
49 Therefore, the estimates of the number of meals provided to the aid recipients are not the best indicator of the programme’s impact, even if the distribution of approximately 156 million meals per year is to be considered very significant.
49 Denne foranstaltnings bidrag til at forbedre leveforholdene for de socialt drligst stillede fremgr tydeligere af skżnnene i tekstboks 5 i Revisionsrettens beretning, som viser, at EU-ordningen tegner sig for mellem 30 og 70 % af den samlede mžngde mad, som uddeles i Fžllesskabet til de socialt drligst stillede, afhžngig af, hvilke velgżrende organisationer og medlemsstater man ser p. 
The added value of this measure in improving the living conditions of the most deprived is better evidenced by the estimates included in box 5 of the Court’s report, according to which the EU scheme provides between 30 and 70 % of the total food distributed in the Community to the most deprived people, depending on the charities and the Member States.
Nu til dags fastsžttes udvžlgelseskriterierne af medlemsstaternes myndigheder i samarbejde med de velgżrende organisationer; disse organisationer skal overholde kriterierne for at kunne deltage i ordningen. 
Nowadays selection criteria and targeting are decided by Member States’ administrations in cooperation with charities, the latter having to respect such criteria to be able to participate in the scheme.
Den offentlige hżring om programmets fremtid, der fandt sted som led i den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning, viste, at der var bred enighed om, at man ikke skulle begržnse valget af den befolkningsgruppe, som kan f hjžlp, til bestemte kategorier blandt de socialt drligst stillede. 
The public consultation on the future of the programme that took place as part of the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation, has revealed a large consensus for not restraining the choice of the population to be helped to certain categories among the most deprived. The Commission’s opinion is that, by virtue of the subsidiarity principle, such choice should be left to Member States.
Ifżlge Revisionsrettens eksempler i tekstboks 5 tegner EU-ordningen sig for mellem 30 og 70 % af den samlede mžngde mad, som uddeles i Fžllesskabet til de socialt drligst stillede, alt efter hvilke velgżrende organisationer og medlemsstater man ser p. 
Following the Court’s examples in Box 5, the EU scheme provides between 30 and 70 % of the total food distributed in the Community to the most deprived people, depending on the charities and the Member States.
Dette er ganske store tal. 
This is not negligible.
Et af sžrtržkkene ved denne ordning er den vigtige rolle, som ngoŐer og velgżrende organisationer spiller gennem deres distributionskžder og deres viden om de problemer, som de socialt drligst stillede i Fžllesskabet str over for. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 38–40. One of the specific features of this scheme is the essential role played by NGOs and charities through their distribution chains and knowledge of the problems affecting the most deprived population of the Community.
I medfżr af subsidiaritetsprincippet er det medlemsstaternes myndigheder, der skal fastsžtte de relevante procedurer og kriterier for udpegelsen af de organisationer, som deltager i gennemfżrelsen af rsplanerne. 
By virtue of the principle of subsidiarity, it is up to Member States’ authorities to determine the appropriate procedures and criteria to designate the organisations taking part in the implementation of annual plans.
Tilsvarende henhżrer udvžlgelsen af modtagerne af fżdevarehjžlp under medlemsstaternes ansvarsomrde i medfżr af subsidiaritetsprincippet. 
In the same line, the selection of food aid recipients falls under the responsibility of Member States by virtue of the principle of subsidiarity.
Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning omfatter et mere vidtgende system for medlemsstaternes rapportering til Kommissionen; det vil vžre nżdvendigt at fastlžgge nžrmere regler herom i de nye gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser. 
The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation includes a more comprehensive reporting system by Member States to the Commission, the details of which would have to be laid down in the corresponding new implementing rules.
De drligst stillede personers fżdevarebehov varierer meget fra den ene person til den anden og over tid. 
The food needs of most deprived individuals vary greatly from case to case and over time.
For at vžre effektiv er ordningen nżdt til at vžre meget fleksibel, s den kan tilpasses til mange forskellige omstžndigheder. Sžrberetning nr. 6/2009 Ń Den Europžiske Unions fżdevarehjžlp til socialt drligt stillede personer: en vurdering af mlene og de anvendte midler og metoder 
In order to be effective, the scheme requires a considerable degree of flexibility so that it can be adjusted to a broad range of circumstances. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed
I renes lżb har Kommissionen tilpasset gennemfżrelsesbestemmelserne for ordningen for at opblżde kriterierne for, hvilke produkter der kan uddeles. 
50 44–45. Over the years the Commission has adjusted the implementing rules of the scheme in order to soften the criteria on the products to be distributed.
Den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning, indeholder en indgende beskrivelse af disse tilpasninger. 
A comprehensive description of these adjustments can be found in the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation.
I Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning er de fżdevarer, som kan uddeles, ikke lžngere begržnset til de kategorier af produkter, der kan gżres til genstand for interventionsopkżb. 
In the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation the range of food that may be distributed is no longer confined to the families of products eligible for intervention.
Formlet med foranstaltningen er ikke at yde den samme stżtte til alle stżttemodtagere, da deres behov er forskellige, og da priserne p fżdevarer varierer fra den ene medlemsstat til den anden. 
The objective of the measure is not to provide an identical level of aid to all aid recipients as their needs are different too and so are the costs of food across Member States.
Det, at der er forskel p de mžngder, der uddeles pr. person, skaber ikke nżdvendigvis risiko for, at ordningen har en ringe indvirkning, eller at stżttemodtagerne behandles ulige. 
The absence of uniform quantities distributed per person does not necessarily create a risk of poor impact nor of aid recipients being treated unequally. 49–50.
Kommissionen vil inden for de begržnsninger, som foranstaltningens art og sžrlige karakteristika medfżrer, gżre sit yderste for at sikre, at de nye gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser, som indfżres efter vedtagelsen af den nye rdsforordning, fastlžgger ml og indikatorer i overensstemmelse med de gžldende retningslinjer. 
The Commission will do its utmost within the limits due to the nature and the specificities of this measure, to secure that the new implementing rules after the adoption of the new Council Regulation lay down objectives and indicators according to applicable guidelines.
Med henblik herp blev der i den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning, foreslet en ržkke mlelige ml og harmoniserede, mlelige indikatorer. 
With this purpose, a series of measurable objectives and harmonised, measurable indicators have been proposed in the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation.
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 52. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 52.
Som fastsat i artikel 2 i forordning 3149/92 vedrżrende tildelingen af ressourcerne til medlemsstaterne betragter Kommissionen de rapporter, som medlemsstaterne indsender, som en del af kontrolordningen, der supplerer de regelmžssige kontakter med medlemsstaterne, navnlig inden for Forvaltningskomiten. 
As foreseen in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 with regard to the allocation of resources to Member States, the Commission duly considers the reports transmitted by Member States as part of the monitoring mechanism and in addition to regular contacts with Member States, in particular within the frame of the Management Committee.
Desuden fremlžgges der i den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede forslaget til en ny rdsforordning, forskellige resultater, som er baseret p en gennemgang af de nationale rapporter, f.eks. antallet af stżttemodtagere. 
Moreover, the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation presents various findings based on the study of the national reports, such as for example the number of beneficiaries of the aid.
Det beviser, at Kommissionen analyserer og anvender disse rapporter. 
This proves that the Commission analyses and makes use of these reports.
I medfżr af subsidiaritetsprincippet er det medlemsstaterne, der skal fastlžgge den definition af modtagerne, som passer bedst til situationen for de socialt drligst stillede i den pgžldende medlemsstat. 
In application of the subsidiarity principle, it falls on Member States to fix the definition of beneficiaries best suited to the particular situation of its most deprived population.
Kommissionen mener derfor ikke, at fžlles standarder eller definitioner af modtagere vil gżre programmet mere effektivt. 
Therefore, the Commission is of the view that common standards or definition of beneficiaries would not bring about any improvement to the efficiency of the programme.
I den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede forslaget til en ny rdsforordning, anfżrte Kommissionen, at den har til hensigt at styrke medlemsstaternes rapporteringsfor-pligtelser. 
In the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation the Commission has expressed its intention to reinforce Member States’ reporting obligations.
Reglerne herfor skal fastlžgges i de nye gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser efter vedtagelsen af den nye rdsforordning. 
Details are to be laid down in the new implementing rules after the adoption of the new Council Regulation.
I forbindelse med planen for 2009 har Kommissionen anvendt en ny metode til beregning af de nationale tildelinger, som tager hensyn til forskellene i kżbekraften i de enkelte medlemsstater. 
For the 2009 plan the Commission has followed a new method for the calculation of national allocations that takes into account the differences in purchasing power between Member States.
Der gives nžrmere oplysninger om denne beregning i bilaget til den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede forslaget til en ny rdsforordning. 
Details about this calculation are provided in the annex to the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation.
Kommissionen tager hensyn til, at gennemfżrelsen i medlemsstaterne langtfra er fuldstžndig. 
The Commission takes account of significant under-execution by Member States.
Det forhold, at der ikke blev foretaget nogen tilpasning i den undersżgte periode (planerne for 2006-2008), skyldes det hżje gennemfżrelsesniveau i de deltagende medlemsstater. 
The fact that no adjustment was applied during the period under scrutiny (plans 2006–2008) is due to the high level of execution achieved by participant Member States.
Kommissionen skal understrege, at enhver beregningsmetode skal vžre baseret p officielle statistikker, som er til rdighed for alle medlemsstaterne. 
The Commission stresses that any calculation method has to be based on official statistics available for all Member States.
Fastlžggelsen af de nationale behov er medlemsstaternes ansvar og foregr efter deres egne procedurer, navnlig med hensyn til hżring af velgżrende organisationer. 
The definition of national needs is the responsibility of Member States following their own procedures, in particular consulting involved charities.
I den forbindelse har Kommissionen altid aktivt tilskyndet medlemsstaterne til at inddrage de velgżrende organisationer i programmet lige fra starten. 
In this sense, the Commission has always actively encouraged Member States to involve charities in the inception of the programme.
Ifżlge Kommissionens forslag til en ny rdsforordning skal medlemsstaterne samfinansiere programmet, hvilket yderligere vil tilskynde medlemsstaterne til at sżrge for den nżdvendige match mellem anmodningerne og de faktiske behov (se bilag 14 i den konsekvensanalyse, som ledsagede Kommissionens forslag). 
The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation foresees that Member States co-finance the programme, which will further encourage Member States to secure the necessary matching between requests and effective needs (see Annex 14 to the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal).
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 59. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 59.
Det er rigtigt, at medlemsstaternes behov ikke altid kan tilfredsstilles 100 %, isžr p grund af mangel p ressourcer, men Kommissionen gżr alt, hvad den kan, for at efterkomme medlemsstaternes anmodninger i videst muligt omfang. 
While it is correct that Member States needs cannot always be satisfied at 100 % mainly due to the lack of resources, the Commission makes every effort to meet Member States requests in the largest possible manner.
Medlemsstaterne meddeler Kommissionen, hvilke produkter de żnsker at modtage. 
Member States communicate to the Commission the products they wish to get.
Disse oprindelige anmodninger drżftes bde i Forvaltningskomiten og under bilaterale kontakter. 
These initial requests are discussed both in the framework of the Management Committee and in bilateral contacts.
Derefter justeres de oprindelige anmodninger. 
As a consequence the initial requests are adjusted.
For eksempel blev ris og smżr erstattet af andre produkter. 
As an example rice and butter were replaced by other products.
Man kan dog ikke slutte ud fra denne procedure, at medlemsstaterne fik tildelt produkter, som de ikke żnskede. 
However, from this procedure it cannot be concluded that the Member States were allocated products which they did not want.
Faktum er, at medlemsstaterne accepterede, at deres oprindelige anmodning ikke kunne efterkommes, og at de som erstatning modtog produkter, de ikke oprindelig havde anmodet om. 
Fact is that Member States accepted that their initial request could not be met and that, in exchange, they have received products which they initially did not demand.
Ikke desto mindre accepterede alle medlemsstaterne disse beslutninger og tog imod de produkter, de i sidste ende fik tildelt. 
Nevertheless, all Member States accepted these decisions and welcomed the products they finally received.
EU-lovgivningen og den nationale lovgivning om offentlige indkżb finder anvendelse p de udbud, der gennemfżres under denne ordning, uden at det er nżdvendigt udtrykkeligt at nžvne denne lovgivning i forordningerne. 
EU and national legislation on public procurement apply to the tenders run in the framework of this scheme, without the need of this legislation being explicitly mentioned in Regulations.
Se Kommissionens svar p punkt 63. 
See the Commission reply to paragraph 63.
Kommissionen foretog seks revisioner mellem 2006 og 2007 uden at finde nogen stżrre mangler i de procedurer, som medlemsstaterne fulgte i forbindelse med udbuddene. 
The Commission has performed 6 audits between 2006 and 2007 without finding any major shortcoming in the procedures followed by Member States to run the tenders.
Desuden har den konstateret, at forretnings-drivende, som er baseret i en anden medlemsstat, fr tildelt leveringsaftaler, hvilket viser, at der er konkurrence mellem forretningsdrivende fra forskellige medlemsstater. 
Furthermore, it has found that operators based in a different Member State are granted with supply contracts, which shows that competition between operators from various Member States occurs.
Alt i alt har den mde, hvorp medlemsstaterne gennemfżrer udbuddene, vist sig at vžre i overensstemmelse med kravene i EU-direktiv 2004/18/EF. 
Overall, the way Member States conduct the tenders has proven in compliance with the requirements laid down in the EU Directive 2004/18/EC.
Et af formlene med programmet er at afsžtte interventionslagrene. 
One of the objectives of the programme is the disposal of intervention stocks.