natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I Kommissionens arbejdsdokument om integration af miljżet understreges det, at sdanne landemiljżprofiler (LMP) er et vigtigt vžrktżj til mainstreaming i programmeringsfasen. Men af Kommissionens gennemgang af en stikprżve p 60 LMP i 2002 fremgik det, at der kun var udarbejdet seks LMP p trods af, at sdanne landemiljżanalyser har vžret bedste praksis siden 1992, da OECDŐs Komit for Udviklingsbistand (DAC) udsendte retningslinjer om dette spżrgsml (4). 
Although the Commission Staff Working Paper on Mainstreaming the Environment stated that such Country Environment Profiles (CEPs) were an important tool for mainstreaming at the programming stage, a Commission review in 2002 covering a sample of 60 CSPs found that only six such CEPs had been drawn up. This is despite the fact that such country environmental analysis has been best practice since 1992 when the OECD Development Assistance Committee issued guidelines on the subject (4).
Som led i forberedelsen af den nžste generation af LSP for perioden 2007-2013 udarbejdede Kommissionen i 2005 LMP for Asien, Latinamerika og de lande i Middelhavsomrdet, som modtager bistand, og tog dermed et vigtigt skridt til at f lżst dette problem. 
The Commission took an important step in 2005 to address this issue by establishing CEPs for Asian, Latin American and Mediterranean aid beneficiary countries as part of the process of preparing the next generation of Country Strategy Papers for the period 2007 to 2013.
Samme fremgangsmde fżlges i forbindelse med AVS-staterne. 
A similar approach is being followed for the ACP States.
Da revisionen var afsluttet, var LSP stadig under udarbejdelse, og det var derfor for tidligt at vurdere, i hvilken udstržkning LMP havde medvirket til at sikre bedre mainstraming i LSP. 
As the CSPs were still under preparation at the time the audit was completed, it was still too early to assess how far the CEPs had improved mainstreaming in the CSPs.
Det vil i sidste ende afhžnge af, hvor hżjt modtagerlandene og Kommissionens tjenestegrene prioriterer behandling i LSP af de miljżspżrgsml, der rejses i LMP. 
This ultimately depends on how high a priority both the beneficiary countries and Commission services attach to addressing in the CSP the environmental issues raised by the CEPs.
(2) Siden slutningen af 1990Őerne har udviklingslandene udarbejdet stra-tegioplžg til nedbringelse af fattigdom: Med fattigdomsbekžmpelse som overordnet ml skal disse oplžg bde tjene som en ramme for landets egne politikker og programmer og for den udenlandske bistand. 
(2) Sincetheendofthe1990sdevelopingcountrieshaveestablishedPov-erty Reduction Strategy Papers to provide a framework for domestic policies and programmes, as well as for foreign assistance, with the overall aim of reducing poverty.
(3) Status and evolution of environmental priorities in the poverty reduction strategies: an assessment of fifty poverty reduction papers. 
(3) Status and evolution of environmental priorities in the poverty reduction strategies: an assessment of fifty poverty reduction papers.
Environment department papers, World Bank, November 2003. 
Environment department papers, World Bank, November 2003.
(4) OECDŐs Komit for Udviklingsbistand (DAC). 
(4) OECD Development Assistance Committee.
Regler for Bistand og miljż. 
Guidelines on Aid and Environment.
Nr. 2: ČGood Practices for Country Environmental Surveys and StrategiesÇ. 
No. 2: ÔGood Practices for Country Environmental Surveys and StrategiesŐ.
Den tilsvarende term i Kommissionen er landemiljżprofil (LMP). 
The equivalent term used by the Commission is Country Environmental Profile (CEP).
29.9.2006 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 235/11 34. 
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/11 34.
Her har Kommissionen ikke gjort store fremskridt med hensyn til at styrke miljżbevidstheden og opbygge modtagerlandenes egen kapacitet til at integrere miljżet, siden den vedtog sin egen mainstreamingstrategi. 
In this respect the Commission has made only limited progress in building up environmental awareness and mainstreaming capacity in beneficiary countries since the adoption of its own mainstreaming strategy.
Forordning (EF) nr. 2493/2000 (1), som har et budget p 93 millioner euro til perioden 2000-2006, er et specifikt instrument, som Kommissionen kunne bruge til fremme af integration af miljżet i udviklingssamarbejdet, men som imidlertid kun har haft begržnset effekt. 
A specific instrument available to the Commission for promoting the integration of the environment into its development cooperation is Regulation (EC) No 2493/2000, which has a budget of 93 million euro over the period 2000 to 2006 (1).
Dette instrument vil kunne bidrage vžsentligt til opbygning af miljżkapacitet i udviklingslandene. 
This instrument could significantly help environmental capacity building in developing countries.
Men Kommissionen har endnu ikke lagt sig fast p en generel tilgang til kapacitetsopbygning og har kun udviklet enkeltprojekter p ad hoc-basis. 
But the Commission has not established an overall approach to capacity building, and has only developed individual projects on an ad hoc basis.
Det er bekymrende, at de tjestemžnd i Kommissionen, som er ansvarlige for udarbejdelsen af LSP, kun i begržnset omfang har udnyttet muligheden for at fżlge uddannelseskurser i miljżintegrering (jf. tekstboks 4). 
On the Commission side, it is of concern that only limited use was made in 2005 by officials responsible for CSP preparation of the opportunities for training in environmental mainstreaming (see Box 4).
Bde GD for Udvikling, GD for Miljż og EuropeAid har specialiserede enheder, som gennemgr miljżaspektet i forbindelse med LSP, men deres gennemgang er normalt ikke baseret p et detaljeret kendskab til det berżrte land, og de begržnsede personaleressourcer er spredt ud p disse tre GDŐer, hvilket ogs betyder, at den kontrol, der udfżres, ofte er overfladisk. 
While DG Development, DG Environment and Europeaid all have specialised units reviewing the environmental aspects of CSPs, these reviews are not generally based on the detailed knowledge of the country concerned, while the spreading of limited staff resources across these three DGs also means that checks are often superficial.
Der er kun blevet gjort lidt for at integrere miljżet i budgetstżtteprogrammerne 36. 
Little has been done to mainstream the environment into budgetary support programmes 36.
Det er Kommissionens og de andre donorers politik, at en stigende procentdel af den samlede bistand skal gives i form af budgetstżtte. 
It is Commission and wider donor policy for budgetary support to make up an increasing percentage of overall aid.
25 % af EUF-bistanden til AVS-landene i henhold til de gžldende LSP er sledes afsat til denne form for stżtte. 
Thus, approximately 25 % of EDF funding allocated to ACP countries under the current CSPs has been allocated to such support.
Kommissionen har imidlertid ikke gjort meget for at integrere miljżet i denne nyere form for bistand, selv om Rdet udtalte fżlgende i sine konklusioner af 31. maj 2001 om Kommissionens strategi for integration af miljżhensyn: ČMiljżhensyn bżr systematisk indg i udarbejdelsen af alle (...) strukturtilpasningsprogrammer samt reform-og stżtteprogrammer for hele sektorerÇ (2). 
However, the Commission has done little to mainstream the environment into this newer form of aid although the Council stated in its conclusions of 31 May 2001 on the CommissionŐs environmental integration strategy that: Ôenvironmental considerations should be systematically incorporated into the preparation of all ... structural adjustment programmes and sector-wide reform and support programmesŐ (2).
Strategisk miljżvurdering (SMV) er det vigtigste miljżvur-deringsvžrktżj til brug i forbindelse med budgetstżtteprogrammer. 
The main environmental appraisal tool to be used in the context of budgetary support programmes is the Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA).
Med dette vžrktżj undersżges miljżaspekterne i de politikker, planer og programmer, som finansieres ved hjžlp af budgetstżtten i de modtagende lande, isžr strategioplžggene til nedbringelse af fattigdom. 
This examines the environmental aspects of the beneficiary countries policies, plans and programmes financed by the budgetary support, notably the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers.
Rdet anfżrte i sine konklusioner, at Č(for) at opn mainstreaming bżr strategisk miljżvurdering (...) benyttes systematisk, isžr under forberedelsen af strukturelle og sektorspecifikke programmer samt i forbindelse med nye (1) Europa-Parlamentets og Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 2493/2000 af 7. november 2000 om foranstaltninger til fremme af fuld integrering af miljżaspektet i udviklingslandenes udviklingsproces (EFT L 288 af 15.11.2000, s. 
The Council conclusions noted that Ôto achieve mainstreaming, Strategic Environment Assessement (SEA) should be used systematically particularly during the preparation of structural and sectoral programmes and for new (1) Regulation(EC)No2493/2000oftheEuropeanParliamentandofthe Council of 7 November 2000 on measures to promote the full integration of the environmental dimension in the development process of developing countries (OJ L 288, 15.11.2000, p.
(2) Rdets konklusioner om en strategi for integration af miljżhensyn i Det Europžiske Fžllesskabs żkonomiske samarbejde og udviklingssamarbejde til fremme af bžredygtig udvikling, punkt 3.6 (8971/01). stżrre infrastrukturerÇ (3). 
(2) Council conclusions on a strategy on the integration of environmental concerns into EC economic and development cooperation to promote sustainable development paragraph 3.6 (8971/01). infrastructuresŐ (3).
Kommissionen erkender ogs SMVŐs betydning i sin mainstreamingstrategi. 
The importance of SEA is also recognised in the CommissionŐs mainstreaming strategy.
Indtil videre har Kommissionen kun brugt dette vžrktżj ganske lidt, til dels fordi det i modsžtning til LMP og miljżkonsekvensvurderingerne (MKV) er et relativt nyt vžrktżj, som donorsamfundet som helhed stadig er i gang med at lžre sig brugen af (4). 
The Commission has made very little use of it so far, partly because, in contrast to CEPs and Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), it is a relatively new tool which the donor community as a whole is still mastering (4).
Kommissionen kunne dog have anvendt sine omfattende hndbżger om budget-og sektorstżtte til at understrege miljżaspektet i forbindelse med denne form for stżtte, men de indeholder s godt som ingen referencer til miljż. 
Nevertheless, the Commission could have used its extensive manuals on budgetary and sectoral support to stress the environmental aspects of such aid, but they contain virtually no reference to the environment.
Kommissionens ansatte har sledes ikke haft nogen retningslinjer for, hvornr og hvordan de skal anvende SMV, og hvordan de skal foretage mere begržnsede miljżvurderinger, nr SMV ikke anses for hensigtsmžssig. 
Thus, Commission staff has had no guidelines either on when and how to use SEAs and on how to carry out more limited environmental appraisals where SEAs are not considered appropriate.
Denne mangel p vurderingsprocedurer afspejles i udarbejdelsen af budgetstżtteprogrammerne: a) Kommissionen havde ikke i noget land vurderet den mulige effekt p miljżet af de statslige politikker og programmer, som der blev ydet budgetstżtte til. b) I 2005 havde 20 AVS-lande modtaget generel budgetstżtte under niende EUF, men kun i et land, Tanzania, var der tilknyttet betingelser udformet med henblik p beskyttelse af miljżet. 
This lack of environmental appraisal procedures is reflected in the preparation of budgetary support programmes: (a) In no country was an appraisal made by the Commission of the possible environmental impact of the government policies and programmes supported by budgetary aid. (b) Out of 20 ACP countries which had received general budget support under the ninth EDF by 2005) in only one country, Tanzania, were conditions attached designed to support the environment.
Tekstboks 5 Et eksempel p integration af miljżet i budgetstżtteprogrammer Under budgetstżtteprogrammet til nedbringelse af fattigdom for 2003-2006 i Tanzania (114 millioner euro) havde donorerne og Tanzanias regering gjort vedtagelsen af en miljżlovgivning til et af de strategiske ml med hensyn til nedbringelse af fattigdom. 
Box 5 An example of mainstreaming the environment into budgetary support programmes In Tanzania under the Poverty Reduction Budget Support Programme 2003-2006 (114 million euro), donors and the Government of Tanzania had made the passing of environmental legislation one of the six poverty reduction strategy objectives.
(3) Rdets konklusioner om en strategi for integration af miljżhensyn i Det Europžiske Fžllesskabs żkonomiske samarbejde og udviklingssamarbejde til fremme af bžredygtig udvikling, punkt 3.14 (8971/01). 
(3) Council conclusions on a strategy on the integration of environmental concerns into EC economic and development cooperation to promote sustainable development paragraph 3.14 (8971/01).
(4) P tidspunktet for revisionen var en arbejdsgruppe under OECD DAC i fžrd med at undersżge anvendelsen af SMV i udviklingssamarbejdet. 
(4) At the time of the audit the OECD DAC had a working party on the use of SEAs in the context of development cooperation.
C 235/12 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 29.9.2006 Procedurerne for miljżintegrering p projektniveau har ikke vžret systematiske nok 39. 
C 235/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.9.2006 Procedures for environmental mainstreaming at project level have not been sufficiently systematic 39.
P trods af at en stigende procentdel af bistanden kanaliseres igennem budgetstżtteprogrammer, s er det stadig mest almindeligt at finansiere enkeltprojekter. 
Despite the increasing proportion of aid channelled through budgetary support, the funding of projects is still the main aid delivery mechanism.
Fżrste trin i miljżvurde-ringen af et projekt er at screene det med henblik p at vurdere potentielle miljżrisici og miljżmuligheder. 
A first step in the environmental appraisal of projects is to screen them in order to assess potential environmental risks and opportunities.
Udkastet til en hndbog i miljżintegrering fra 2001 fastslog princippet om en sdan screening i form af et skema, ČEnvironmental Integration FormÇ, som skulle udfyldes for hvert projekt under overholdelse af retningslinjerne i hndbogen. 
The 2001 draft Environment Integration Manual established the principle of such screening in the form of an ÔEnvironmental Integration FormŐ to be completed for each project and following guidelines in the manual.
Hndbogen er stadig kun et udkast (jf. punkt 21), og denne procedure er derfor ikke blevet indfżrt systematisk. 
Since the Manual has remained only a draft (see paragraph 21), this procedure has not been systematically introduced.
Fżlgelig anvendte mange af delegationerne andre procedurer, eller de havde slet ingen procedurer for miljżscreening. 
As a result many Delegations used other procedures or did not follow any environmental screening procedures at all.
Disse mangler skyldes til dels, at der ikke er involveret miljżeksperter i screeningen af projekter, som ikke er miljżprojekter. 
These deficiencies are partly due to the fact that environmental experts are not involved in screening non-environmental projects.
I delegationerne er miljżekspertisen i vid udstržkning koncentreret om lande, hvor miljż er et prioriteret omrde, og under alle omstžndigheder anvendes der ikke sdan ekspertise til kontrol af miljżaspektet i projektidentifikationer i forbindelse med projekter, som ikke er miljżprojekter. 
In the Delegations, environmental expertise is largely focused on countries where the environment is a priority field, and in any case such expertise is not used to check the environmental aspects of project identification fiches for non-environmental projects.
Tilsvarende er antallet af miljżeksperter i EuropeAid kun tilstržkkeligt til, at de kan vurdere kvaliteten af miljżprojekter og projekter til beskyttelse af naturressourcer, men ikke til, at de kan vurdere, om miljżet er blevet integreret i projekter, som ikke er miljżprojekter. 
At Europeaid, the number of environmental experts is similarly only sufficient to assess the quality of environment and natural resource projects but not whether the environment has been mainstreamed into non-environment projects.
Manglerne i screeningsprocessen var med til at skabe problemer med hensyn til at bestemme, hvornr der skulle foretages en vurdering af virkningerne p miljżet (VVM). 
Shortcomings in the screening process contributed to problems in identifying when Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) should be carried out.
VVM har lžnge vžret et veletableret vžrktżj til forudgende at bestemme et projekts sandsynlige virkning p miljżet og til anbefaling af afbżdende foranstaltninger i udformnings-og gennemfżrelsesfasen. 
EIAs are long-established tools for identifying ex-ante the likely impact of a project on the environment and recommending mitigating measures for the design and implementation phase.
Siden 1985 har VVM vžret en del af Den Europžiske Unions lovgivning for omrdet interne politikker (2). 
The European Union has had EIA legislation for internal policies since 1985 (2).
I den fjerde Lomkonvention fra 1990 er det fastsat, at der i forbindelse med omfattende projekter og projekter, der indebžrer en betydelig risiko for miljżet, kan foretages undersżgelser af miljżvirknin-gerne (3). 
The 1990 Lom IV Convention required EIAs to be carried out for large-scale projects and those posing a significant threat to the environment (3).
I 1992 udsendte OECDŐs Komit for Udviklingsbistand (DAC) retningslinjer for bedste praksis med hensyn til VVM for udviklingsprojekter, som skal fżlges af alle organisationens medlemmer (4). 
In 1992 the OECD DAC issued best practice guidelines on ElAs for development projects to be followed by all its members (4).
VVM er sžrlig relevante i forbindelse med infrastruktur-og mineprojekter, eftersom disse generelt har stor indvirkning p miljżet. 
EIAs are particularly relevant for infrastructure and mining projects, since these generally have a high environmental impact.
I de nugžldende landestrategipapirer (LSP) er op til 35 % af midlerne fra niende EUF udelukkende afsat til vejprojekter. 
Up to 35 % of ninth EDF financing under the current Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) is allocated for road projects alone.
Rettens revision viste imidlertid, at der for flere af sdanne projekter ikke var udarbejdet nogen VVM. 
However, the CourtŐs audit identified several such projects where no EIA had been drawn up.
I en evaluering af EFŐs interventioner i transportsektoren i tredjelande fra 2004 konstaterer Kommissionen, at der for fire af de 15 evaluerede projekters vedkommende ikke var foretaget nogen VVM. 
A Commission evaluation in 2004 of ÔEC interventions in the transport sector in third countriesŐ found that no EIA had been carried out for four of the fifteen projects evaluated.
Selv i de tilfžlde, hvor der var foretaget en mere omfattende VVM, var denne generelt koncentreret omkring selve vejprojektet, og det var ikke blevet undersżgt, hvilken virkning p miljżet de nye żkonomiske aktiviteter som fżlge af de forbedrede adgangsforhold ville f. 
Even where more substantial EIAs had been completed, their focus was generally on the direct impact of the road project itself on the environment rather than the impact on the environment of the new economic activities brought about by the improved access.
Denne mangel er sžrlig alvorlig, nr der er tale om veje, som gr gennem fżlsomme omrder som f.eks. tropiske skove, hvor der er en direkte forbindelse mellem de forbedrede adgangsforhold og problemet med stigende afskovning og ulovlig jagt. 
This weakness is especially important for roads crossing sensitive areas such as tropical forests, where there is a direct link between the improved access and increasing deforestation and illegal hunting.
(2) Rdets direktiv 85/337/EŻF af 27. juni 1985 om vurdering af visse offentlige og private projekters indvirkning p miljżet (EFT L 175 af 5.7.1985, s. 
(2) Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.
40), som žndret ved direktiv 97/11/EF (EFT L 73 af 14.3.1997, s. 5). 
40), amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 (OJ L 73, 14.3.1997, p.
(3) Artikel 37 i den fjerde AVS/EŻF-konvention undertegnet den 15.12.1989 i Lom (EFT L 229 af 17.8.1991). 
(3) Article 37 of Fourth ACP-EEC Convention signed at Lom on 15 December 1989 (OJ L 229, 17.8.1991).
(4) OECD Development Assistance Committee Guidelines on Aid and Environment No. 1: ČGood practices for Environment Impact Assessment of Development ProjectsÇ, Paris 1992. 
(4) OECD Development Assistance Committee Guidelines on Aid and Environment No. 1 ÔGood Practices for Environmental Impact Assessment of Development ProjectsŐ, Paris 1992.
Tekstboks 6 Miljżscreening i Kommissionens delegation i Nicaragua Den regionale delegation i Nicaragua beskžftiger sig med seks lande og har over 140 ansatte. 
Box 6 Environmental screening in the CommissionŐs delegation in Nicaragua The CommissionŐs Regional Delegation in Nicaragua deals with six countries and has over 140 staff.
Revisionen viste, at delegationen ikke anvender nogen retningslinjer for miljżscreening, og der var ikke udfżrt nogen miljżscreening, som havde medfżrt en mere detaljeret vurdering af projekterne og programmerne i LSP for 2002-2006. 
The audit found that no guidelines for environmental screening are used by the Delegation and no environmental screening leading to further detailed assessment had been carried out for projects and programmes in the 2002 to 2006 CSP.
Endvidere havde delegationen ingen miljżekspert, selv om en sdan ekspert ville have kunnet overvge og stżtte indfżrelsen af miljżscreeningsprocedurer. 
Moreover, the Delegation did not have an environmental expert although such an expert could have supervised and provided support to environmental screening procedures.
Kommissionens vigtigste procedure til kontrol af miljżscreening er i praksis de projektidentifikationer, som delegationerne udarbejder ved begyndelsen af projektcyklussen og indsender til EuropeAids kvalitetsstżttegruppe (oQSG). 
In practice, the main procedure used by the Commission for checking environmental screening is in the context of preparing project identification fiches, which are drawn up by Delegations at the beginning of the project cycle and submitted to the Europeaid Office Quality Support Group (OQSG).
Miljż er imidlertid kun et af en hel ržkke spżrgsml, der undersżges, og den revision af 20 projektidentifikationer, som oQSG foretog i 2005, viste, at miljżspżrgsmlet ikke var blevet behandlet korrekt: a) Selv om projektet skal klassificeres i overensstemmelse med dets indvirkning p miljżet (1), var dette ikke sket i nogen af de 20 sager. b) Selv om der skulle vžre en beskrivelse af, hvordan miljżet skulle integreres i projektets design, var det ikke sket i 16 af sagerne. 
The environment is, however, only one of a whole series of issues to be addressed by these fiches and the audit of 20 project identification fiches reviewed by the OQSG in 2005 found that environmental issues had not been adequately addressed in them: (a) although it was required to classify the project according to its environmental impact (1), in none of the 20 cases had this been done; (b) although it was required to explain how the environment was to be mainstreamed into the project design, in 16 cases this had not been done.
(1) De tre kategorier er: A Ń Stor indvirkning p miljżet, B Ń Vžsentlige potentielle miljżrisici og miljżmuligheder, C Ń Lille indvirkning p miljżet. 
(1) The three categories foreseen are: A Ń High Environmental Impact, B Ń Significant possible environmental risks and opportunities, C Ń Low Environmental Impact.