natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen traf afgżrelse om at anvende finansielle korrektioner i syv medlemsstater med hensyn til EFRU (Belgien, Gržkenland, Spanien, Frankrig, Tyskland, Italien og Det Forenede Kongerige), i seks medlemsstater med hensyn til Samhżrighedsfonden (Spanien, Gržkenland, Irland, Litauen, Portugal og Slovakiet) og i n medlemsstat med hensyn til ESF (Frankrig). 
Financial corrections were decided by the Commission in seven Member States for the ERDF (Belgium, Greece, Spain, France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom), six Member States for the CF (Spain, Greece, Ireland, Lithuania, Portugal and Slovakia) and one Member State for the ESF (France).
De korrektioner, Kommissionen traf afgżrelse om, belżb sig til 1 037 millioner euro eller ca. 
The corrections decided by the Commission amount to 1 037 million euro or around 0.5 % of the total ERDF, CF, ESF budget (see Figure 3).
31 Figur 3 - Fordeling p medlemsstaterne af finansielle korrektioner plagt ved kommissionsafgżrelser: programmeringsperioden 2000-2006 (millioner euro) Portugal FK 6 Noter: Spanien FK 112 Forklaring Irland FK 22 Luxembourg Tyskland FK 0,1 Italien FK Malta FK 0 0 0,2 0,3 Den Tjekkiske Republik FK 0 Det Forenede Kongerige Finland FK 0 Estland FK 0 Letland FK 0 Litauen FK Żstrig FK Slovakiet FK Ungarn FK 26 Danmark FK 0 Nederlandene FK 0 Sverige FK 0 Polen FK Slovenien FK 0 83 FK 0 FK 0,3 Belgien 0 Frankrig FK 23 FK 0 Gržkenland FK 763 Tallene ovenfor vedrżrer programmer gennemfżrt i de enkelte medlemsstater. 
Figure 3 ‐ Distribution of financial corrections imposed through Commission decisions: 2000‐2006 programming period (in million euro) Portugal FC 6 Notes: Legend Ireland FC 22 Sweden FC 0 Poland FC Slovenia FC 0 83 Luxemburg Belgium FC 0 FC 0 United Kingdom Finland FC 0 Estonia FC 0 Latvia FC 0 Lithuania FC 0,2 Austria FC 26 Denmark FC 0 Netherlands FC 0 FC 0 FC 0,3 FC 0,1 Spain FC 112 Italy FC Financial corrections imposedthrough Commissiondecision (11) No financial correction decisions (14) 763 Cyprus FC 0 France Slovakia FC 0,3 Hungary FC 0 Greece FC FC 23 Germany 0 Czech Rep. Malta FC 0 The figures provided above relate to programmes implemented within one Member State.
Hertil kommer interregionale programmer. 
Interregional programmes are in addition to these.
For disse programmer var den tildelte finansieringsramme og de besluttede finansielle korrektioner p henholdsvis 6 036 millioner euro og 1 million euro. Kilde: Den Europžiske Revisionsret p grundlag af oplysninger fra Kommissionen. 
The related allocated envelope and decided financial correction amount to 6 036 million euro and 1 million euro, respectively. Source: European Court of Auditors based on information provided by the Commission.
I forbindelse med de bekržftede finansielle korrektioner konstaterede vi med hensyn til EFRU, at fem af de 25 medlemsstater (Irland, Letland, Litauen, Luxembourg og Ungarn) var i stand til at erstatte hele den bekržftede finansielle korrektion med nye udgifter (angivet med grżnt i figur 4). 
As for confirmed financial corrections, we found that, for the ERDF, five of the 25 Member States (Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg and Hungary) were able to replace the whole amount of the confirmed financial correction with new expenditure (indicated in green on Figure 4).
Det samme gjaldt med hensyn til ESF for fem af de 25 medlemsstater (Irland, Letland, Litauen, Portugal og Slovakiet) og med hensyn til Samhżrighedsfonden for fire ud af 16 medlemsstater (Letland, Litauen, Ungarn og Slovenien) (angivet med grżnt i figur 5 og 6). 
This was also the case for the ESF in five of the 25 Member States (Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal and Slovakia) and for CF in four of 16 Member States (Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary and Slovenia) (indicated in green on Figures 5 and 6).
Tilsammen tegnede disse medlemsstater sig for 3 % af EFRU-budgettet, 10 % af ESF-budgettet og 10 % af samhżrighedsfondsbudgettet. 
Taken together, these Member States accounted for 3 % of the ERDF, 10 % of the ESF and 10 % of 30 the CF budget.
Disse medlemsstater var i stand til at anmelde tilstržkkelige yderligere udgifter til at kompensere for effekten af de bekržftede finansielle korrektioner, s de bekržftede finansielle korrektioner ikke havde nogen effekt p udnyttelsen af deres budgetramme. 
These Member States were able to declare enough additional expenditure to compensate for the effect of confirmed financial corrections, so the confirmed financial corrections had no impact on the use of their budget envelope.
Tallene ovenfor vedrżrer programmer gennemfżrt i de enkelte medlemsstater. 
The figures provided above relate to programmes implemented within one Member State.
For disse programmer var den tildelte finansieringsramme og de bekržftede finansielle korrektioner p henholdsvis 6 036 millioner euro og 68 millioner euro. Kilde: Den Europžiske Revisionsret p grundlag af oplysninger fra Kommissionen. 
The related allocated envelope and confirmed financial correction amount to 6 036 million euro and 68 million euro, respectively. Source: European Court of Auditors based on information provided by the Commission.
De bekržftede finansielle korrektioner havde en effekt p udnyttelsen af den tildelte budgetramme for 17 medlemsstater med hensyn til EFRU, for 16 medlemsstater med hensyn til ESF og for ti medlemsstater med hensyn til Samhżrighedsfonden (angivet med rżdt i figur 4, 5 og 6). 
In the case of 17 Member States for the ERDF, 16 Member States for the ESF and ten Member States for CF confirmed financial corrections had an impact on the use of the allocated budget envelope (indicated in red on Figures 4, 5 and 6).
Tilsammen tegnede disse medlemsstater sig for 96 % af EFRU-midlerne, 88 % af ESF-midlerne og 89 % af samhżrighedsfondsmidlerne. 
Taken together, these Member States accounted for 96 % of the ERDF, 88 % of the ESF and 89 % of the CF funding. ENV.
Disse medlemsstater var ikke i stand til at erstatte udgifter fuldt ud, og dermed blev de bekržftede finansielle korrektioner i det mindste delvis til finansielle nettokorrektioner. 
These Member States were not able to use replacement in full and the confirmed financial correction thus became at least in part a net financial correction.
Vi beregnede, at disse finansielle nettokorrektioner belżb sig til 1 386 millioner euro. 
We calculated that this net financial correction amounts to 1 386 million euro.
0,6 % af de 25 medlemsstaters samlede budget for EFRU, Samhżrighedsfonden og ESF. 
This corresponds to around 0.6 % of the total ERDF, CF and ESF budget for all 25 Member States.
Figur 5 - De bekržftede finansielle korrektioners effekt p medlemsstaterne: programperioden 2000-2006 - ESF (millioner euro) Portugal Bekržf tede f inansielle korrektioner uden ef f ekt (5) Bekržf tede f inansielle korrektioner med ef f ekt (16) Ingen f inansielle korrektioner plagt (4) FR FK 4 900 6 Spanien FR FK Irland FR 1 051 FK 3 Luxembourg FR FK Belgien 1 724 Polen 44 Tyskland FR 2042 Den Tjekkiske Republik FR 457 FK 0 12 210 864 Italien FR FK Det Forenede Kongerige Finland FR 908 FK 0 Estland FR 73 FK 1 Letland FR 135 FK 3 Litauen FR 188 FK 0,004 Żstrig FR 761 FK 3 Slovakiet FR 344 FK 3 Ungarn FR 469 FK 8 Gržkenland FR 4 878 FK20 FR24 FK 0 FR FK 7 942 164 Danmark FR 461 FK 0,02 Nederlandene Sverige FR 1 086 FK 11 FR 36 FK 2 FK 11 11 813 26 FR 1 113 Frankrig FR FK 6 954 360 Forklaring FR FK Malta FK Slovenien FR FK 8 859 396 51 82 2 FR FK 0 11 Note: FR = tildelt finansieringsramme. 
Figure 5 ‐Impact of confirmed financial corrections on Members States: 2000‐2006 programme period – ESF (in million euro) Portugal Confirmed financial corrections without impact (5) Confirmed financial corrections with impact (16) No financialcorrectionsimposed (4) Cyprus ENV. 24 FC 0 ENV. FC 6 4 900 Ireland ENV.
Med hensyn til EFRU var der tre medlemsstater (Cypern, Malta og Slovenien), med hensyn til ESF fire medlemsstater (Den Tjekkiske Republik, Cypern, Malta og Finland), og med hensyn til Samhżrighedsfonden to medlemsstater (Cypern og Malta), hvor der ikke blev anvendt bekržftede finansielle korrektioner i programperioden 2000-2006. 
For the ERDF there were three Member States (Cyprus, Malta and Slovenia), for the ESF there were four (Czech Republic, Cyprus, Malta and Finland) and for the CF there were two (Cyprus and Malta) where no confirmed financial corrections were applied in the 2000‐2006 programme period.
EU-Domstolen har i det vžsentlige bekržftet Kommissionens vurderinger af svagheder og dens finansielle korrektioner 52. 
The Commission’s assessment of weaknesses and financial corrections were in substance confirmed by the European Court of Justice 52.
Nr Kommissionen vedtager suspensioner eller finansielle korrektioner ved afgżrelser, har medlemsstaterne ret til at indbringe disse afgżrelser for EU-Domstolen. 
Where the Commission enforces suspensions or financial corrections by way of a Commission decision, the Member State is entitled to challenge this decision before the European Court of Justice (ECJ).
Vi undersżgte derfor, om EU-Domstolen i det vžsentlige har stadfžstet Kommissionens afgżrelser vedrżrende de tidligere programperioder. 
We therefore looked at whether the Commission decisions for previous programme periods were upheld in substance by the ECJ. 34
2000-2006 1994-1999 Tabel 2 - Kommissionens afgżrelser om finansielle korrektioner i programperioderne 1994-1999 og 2000-2006 Programperiode Medlemsstat Sager indbragt Domstolen Afsluttet rende Kommissionens afgżrelse IALT: 115 22 137 137 41 37 4 28 41 9 37 Belgien Nederlandene 3 Żstrig 3 Portugal 5 Finland 1 Det Forenede Kongerige 7 Interreg1 4 4 4 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 Subtotal for 1994-1999: 77 19 96 26 26 0 20 6 Belgien 1 Tyskland 1 Irland 1 Gržkenland 2 Spanien 21 1 1 1 2 Frankrig Italien Litauen 1 Portugal 4 Slovakiet 1 Det Forenede Kongerige 1 Interreg1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 Subtotal for 2000-2006: 38 3 41 15 11 4 8 3 1 Interregionale programmer gennemfżres af mere end n medlemsstat. 
2000‐2006 1994‐1999 Table 2 ‐ Commission decisions on financial corrections (1994‐1999 and 2000‐2006 programme periods) Programme period Member state Commission decision Belgium Germany 16 Ireland 5 Greece 7 Spain 14 France 4 Italy 7 Luxembourg Netherlands 3 Austria 3 Portugal 5 Finland 1 United Kingdom 7 Interreg1 4 Subtotal for 1994‐1999: 77 19 96 26 26 0 20 6 Lithuania 1 Portugal 4 Slovakia 1 United Kingdom 1 Interreg1 1 1 411 1 1 1 1 Subtotal for 2000‐2006: 38 3 41 15 11 4 8 3 TOTAL: 115 22 137 41 37 4 28 9 41 37 1 Interregional programmes are implemented by more than one Member State.
Kilde: Oplysninger fra Kommissionen. 
Source: Information provided by the Commission.
DA.docx 8.3.2017 Afgżrelser om finansielle korrektioner Status for EU-Verse Dom (afsluttede sager) GD REGIO GD EMPL I alt 134 Tyskland 16 1 17 Irland 516 11 11 10 1 4 Gržkenland 7 Spanien 14 Frankrig 4 Italien 7 Luxembourg 7 16 4 8 7 5 5 3 3 5 1 2 2 9 4 2 2 5 5 2 1 2 21 123 314 11836 11 1 2111 2 1 1 1 stadfžstet annulleret 36 
DG REGIO Total Financial correction decisions DG EMPL Number of cases challenged in front of ECJ Status Closed Open Judgement (for the closed cases) 134 1 17 11 11 10 1 4 137 1 6 7 2 2 2 5 1 2 16 5 4 8 7 4 5 5 4 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 9 Belgium 1 Germany 1 Ireland 1 Greece 2 Spain 21 France 1 2 3 1 1 1 Italy 3142111 3 1 3 5 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 21118362 confirmed annulled 35
Vedrżrende perioderne 2000-2006 og 1994-1999, hvor Kommissionen i alt havde truffet 137 afgżrelser om finansielle korrektioner, var der pr. udgangen af 2015 indbragt 41 sager for EU-Domstolen (jf. tabel 2). 
Up to the end of 2015, from a total of 137 financial correction decisions, 41 cases were brought to the ECJ in relation to the 2000‐2006 and the 1994‐1999 periods (see Table 2).
Af disse 41 sager var 37 afsluttet ved udgangen af 2016. 
Of the 41 cases, 37 were closed by the end of 2016.
Andre spżrgsml vedrżrte anmeldelse af udgifter afholdt uden for stżtteberettigelsesperioden, flytning af midler mellem operationelle programmer og identificering af svagheder i forvaltnings-og kontrolsystemer. 
Some other issues include submission of costs incurred outside the eligibility period, switching of funds between operational programmes and identification of weaknesses in management and control procedures.
I ni af de 37 afsluttede sager annullerede EU-Domstolen Kommissionens afgżrelse om finansiel korrektion. 
In nine of the 37 closed cases, the ECJ annulled the Commission’s financial correction decision.
I alle ni sager var annullationen baseret p formalitetsspżrgsml, og der blev ikke taget stilling til realiteten i sagen. 
In all nine cases the annulment was due to procedural issues without any conclusions on the substance of the case.
Tre af de fire verserende sager omhandler de samme spżrgsml og er under appelbehandling. 
Three of the four open cases with the same issues are under appeal.
I alle andre tilfžlde bekržftede EU-Domstolen Kommissionens afgżrelse med hensyn til bde formaliteten og realiteten. 
In all other cases, the Commission decision was confirmed by the ECJ both on form and on substance.
Dette tyder p, at Kommissionen i perioderne 1994-1999 og 2000-2006 generelt fortolkede artiklerne om anvendelse af finansielle korrektioner fornuftigt og anvendte rimelige finansielle korrektioner. 
This suggests that the Commission has generally made robust interpretations of the articles governing the application of financial corrections and had applied proportionate financial corrections during the 1994‐1999 and 2000‐2006 periods.
Kommissionen havde endnu ikke truffet afgżrelser om finansielle korrektioner vedrżrende programperioden 2007-2013. 
So far there were no Commission decisions on financial correction for the 2007‐2013 programme period.
Der var en enkelt sag, hvor en medlemsstat havde anfžgtet en kommissionsafgżrelse om suspension af en betaling vedrżrende perioden 2007-2013, men den verserede stadig og indgik derfor ikke i vores analyse. 
There was only one case where a Member State challenged a Commission decision in relation to a payment suspension for the 2007‐2013 period, but this case is still on‐going and thus not covered by our analysis.
Kommissionen gjorde i stigende grad brug af forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner i perioden 2007-2013 58. 
The Commission makes increasing use of preventive measures and financial corrections during the 2007‐2013 period 58.
Det er endnu ikke muligt at foretage en endelig vurdering med hensyn til perioden 2007-2013, eftersom afslutningen af OP'erne under EFRU/Samhżrighedsfonden og ESF fżrst begynder i 2017. 
For the 2007‐2013 period no final assessment is possible at this stage since the closure process for ERDF/CF and ESF OPs will be initiated only in 2017.
Vi s derfor p, hvordan Kommissionen havde gjort brug af de lovgivningsmžssige bestemmelser, der giver mulighed for at beskytte EU-budgettet mod regelstridige udgifter i denne periode. 
We therefore looked at the way in which the Commission has made use of the regulatory provisions which were available during this period to protect the EU budget from irregular spending.
Hvor det var relevant, sammenlignede vi ogs med perioden 2000-2006. 37 
Where appropriate, we also made a comparison with the 2000‐2006 period. 36
I perioden 2007-2013 brugte Kommissionen de disponible foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af EU-budgettet i stżrre omfang end tidligere 59. 
During the 2007‐2013 period the Commission used the measures at its disposal to protect the EU budget more extensively than in the past 59.
Kommissionen bżr gżre brug af de foranstaltninger til at beskytte EU-budgettet, der er fastsat i forordningerne, s snart der konstateres vžsentlige svagheder i forvaltnings-og kontrolsystemet, og disse kan medfżre, at medlemsstaterne anmelder regelstridige udgifter. 
The Commission should make use of the measures to protect the EU budget set out in the regulations as soon as significant weaknesses are detected in the management and control system and these may result in irregular expenditure being claimed by Member States.
Dette er nżdvendigt for, at medlemsstaterne kan forbedre deres systemer og undg at anmelde yderligere regelstridige udgifter til godtgżrelse over EU-budgettet. 
This is necessary so that Member States can improve their systems and avoid claiming additional irregular expenditure from the EU budget.
Vi har derfor sammenlignet Kommissionens anvendelse af forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner i perioden 2007-2013 og i den foregende periode. 
We have therefore compared the use made by the Commission of preventive measures and financial corrections for the 2007‐2013 period with that for the previous period.
Med hensyn til perioden 2007-2013 var der ved udgangen af 2015 blevet plagt finansielle korrektioner p i alt ca. 3 326 millioner euro (jf. tabel 1). 
For the 2007‐2013 period, financial corrections of around 3 326 million euro had been imposed by the end of 2015 (see Table 1).
Det svarer til 1,0 % af den samlede budgetramme. 
This corresponds to 1.0 % of the total budget envelope.
Derudover var betalinger p i alt ca. 28 446 millioner euro blevet afbrudt (8 % af den samlede tildelte finansieringsramme). 
In addition, payments for around 28 446 million euro had been interrupted (8 % of the total allocated envelope).
I perioden 2007-2013 brugte Kommissionen forebyggende foranstaltninger tidligere og i stżrre omfang end i den foregende periode 61. 
Preventive measures were applied earlier and more extensively in the 2007‐2013 programme period than in the previous period 61.
Vores analyse viser, at Kommissionen begyndte at bruge forebyggende foranstaltninger i 2010, dvs. det fjerde r i programperioden 2007-2013. 
Our analysis shows that the Commission started to use preventive measures in 2010, i.e. the 4th year of the 2007‐2013 programme period.
Det var to r tidligere end i programperioden 2000-2006 og fem r fżr stżtteberettigelsesperiodens udgang (jf. figur 7 og tabel 1). 
This was two years earlier than for the 2000‐2006 programme period and five years before the eligibility period finished (see Figure 7 and Table 1).
Desuden džkkede de forebyggende foranstaltninger en stżrre del af OP'erne tidligere, og Kommissionen traf ogs alvorligere foranstaltninger tidligere. 
Moreover, the preventive measures covered a larger share of the OPs earlier and the Commission also imposed more serious measures earlier.
F.eks. blev de fżrste suspensioner af betalinger til OP'er i perioden 2000-2006 foretaget i 2007 (det ottende r i perioden 2000-2006). 
For example, for the 2000‐2006 period, payment suspensions were applied to the first OPs in 2007 (the 8th year of the 2000‐ 2006 period).
I perioden 2007-2013 skete det allerede i 2010 (det fjerde r i perioden 2007-2013). 
For the 2007‐2013 period, this was already the case in 2010 (the 4th year of the 2007‐2013 period.
20 % af OP'erne med suspenderede betalinger i den foregende periode havde fet dem suspenderet i 2007 (det ottende r i perioden), havde 68 % af OP'erne med suspenderede betalinger i perioden 2007-2013 fet dem suspenderet i det tilsvarende r. 
In addition, while for the previous programme period around 20 % of all OPs with a payment suspension had been suspended in year 2007 (the 8th year of the period), for the 2007‐2013 period this was the case for 68 % of such OPs.
Kommissionens tidligere, mere omfattende og strengere anvendelse af forebyggende foranstaltninger gżr det muligt at foretage mere rettidige forbedringer af mange forvaltnings-og kontrolsystemer og styrker ogs medlemsstaternes incitament til at foretage de nżdvendige forbedringer. 
This earlier, more comprehensive and stricter application of preventive measures by the Commission allows for more timely improvements to a larger number of management and 37 control systems, and also increases the incentives for Member States to make the necessary improvements.
I perioden 2007-2013 steg de finansielle korrektioner set i forhold til de konstaterede regelstridige udgifter 64. 
Relative increase in financial corrections during the 2007‐2013 period when compared to the level of irregular spending detected 64.
Vores analyse viser, at de finansielle korrektioners omfang og gennemfżrelsesgrad var omtrent ens i perioden 2007-2013 og i den foregende periode, 2000-2006 (jf. figur 8). 
Our analysis also shows that in the 2007‐2013 period the level of financial corrections and the implementation rate of the imposed financial corrections were similar to those observed during the previous 2000‐2006 period (see Figure 8).
De to perioders finansielle korrektioner skal imidlertid sžttes i perspektiv og sammenholdes med omfanget af de underliggende regelstridige udgifter. 
The levels of financial corrections in the two periods need, however, to be put into perspective and must be compared with the underlying level of irregular expenditure.
Vores revisioner siden 2009 har vist, at fejlforekomsten for programperioden 2007-2013 er vžsentlig lavere end fejlforekomsten for programperioden 2000-200629. 
Our audits since 2009 have shown that the level of error for the 2007‐2013 period is significantly lower than for the 2000‐2006 programme period29.
Det betyder, at omfanget af regelstridige udgifter var vžsentlig stżrre i perioden 2000-2006 end i perioden 2007-2013. Og det vil sige, at der er tale om en relativ stigning i de finansielle korrektioner. 
This means that there was significantly more irregular expenditure during the 2000‐2006 than during the 2007‐2013 period. In turn, this implies that the level of financial corrections has increased in relative terms.
39 29 rsberetningen for regnskabsret 2015, punkt 6.74 (EUT C 375 af 13.10.2016). 
38 29 Annual Report concerning financial year 2015, paragraph 6.74 (OJ C 375, 13.10.2016).
Kilde: Den Europžiske Revisionsret p grundlag af oplysninger fra Kommissionen. Den endelige effekt af de finansielle korrektioner vedrżrende perioden 2007-2013 kan fżrst fastsls ved afslutningen 65. 
Source: European Court of Auditors based on information provided by the Commission. Final impact of financial corrections for the 2007‐2013 period can be determined only at closure 65.
Fżrst nr de endelige betalingsanmodninger er indgivet af medlemsstaterne og vurderet af Kommissionen, vil det vžre muligt at fastsl den finansielle effekt af de bekržftede 2007-2013 2000-2006 finansielle korrektioner vedrżrende OP'erne for 2007-2013 (dvs. om de finansielle korrektioner fżrte til tab af midler). 
The final impact of the confirmed financial corrections on the 2007‐2013 OPs (i.e. whether the financial corrections lead to loss of funds) can however be assessed only once the final payment claim has been submitted by the Member State and assessed by the Commission. As for the 2007‐2013 programme period, submission of final payment claims 40
De endelige betalingsanmodninger vedrżrende programperioden 2007-2013 skal indgives senest den 31. marts 201730, s p tidspunktet for udarbejdelsen af denne beretning var det endnu for tidligt at vurdere effekten p medlemsstaterne af de finansielle korrektioner vedrżrende programperioden 2007-2013. 
must be done by 31 March 201730, so it is too early to assess at the time of drafting this report the impact on Member States of financial corrections for the 2007‐2013 programme period.
Bilag IV giver mere detaljerede oplysninger pr. udgangen af 2015 om gennemfżrelsen af Kommissionens foranstaltninger for perioden 2007-2013 vedrżrende de enkelte medlemsstater. 
Annex IV provides more detailed information per Member State related to the implementation by the end of 2015 of the Commission’s measures for the 2007‐2013 period.
I perioden 2007-2013 anvendte Kommissionen forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner i overensstemmelse med proportionalitetsprincippet Kommissionens foranstaltninger i perioden 2007-2013 fokuserede p de medlemsstater, der havde de mest risikobehžftede programmer 67. 
The Commission applied its preventive measures and financial corrections in a proportionate manner in the 2007‐2013 period The Commission’s measures in the 2007‐2013 period focussed on the Member States with the riskiest programmes 67.