natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Slagteri Undersżgelse fżr slagtning Dyr uegnede til menneskefżde Slagtning Undersżgelse efter slagtning Dyr med positivt resultat af BSE-hurtigtest Figur 3 Anvendelse af kvžg slagtet til menneskefżde Dyr Collagen Hydrol. proteiner Destruktion 
Animals Slaughterhouse Ante-mortem inspection Animals unfit for human consumption Slaughter Post-mortem inspection Figure 3 Uses of bovine animals slaughtered for human consumption Animals positive to BSE rapid test Destruction
(2) Importeret tilfžlde. 
(2) Imported case.
(3) Heraf importerede tilfžlde: Irland: 5 i 1989, 1 i 1990, 2 i 1991 og 1992, 1 i 1994 og 1995 Frankrig: 1 i 1999 Ń Portugal: 1 i 2000. 
(3) Includes imported cases: Ireland: five in 1989, one in 1990, two in 1991 and 1992, one in 1994 and 1995. France: one in 1999; Portugal: one in 2000.
(4) Importerede tilfžlde registreret i 1989 (Falklandsżerne: 1; Oman: 2) og i 1993 (Canada: 1). 
(4) Imported cases recorded in 1989 (Falkland Islands: one; Oman: two) and in 1993 (Canada: one).
Kilder: Kommissionen, Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug. 
Sources: Commission, DG SANCO.
Til og med 1996: For alle lande: OIE. 
Up to 1996 inclusive, OIE for all countries.
Efter 1996: For medlemsstaterne: Systemet for anmeldelse af dyresygdomme og mnedlige BSE-rapporter for Det Forenede Kongerige og Portugal, samt testrapporter. For de żvrige lande: OIE. 
After 1996, system for the notification of animal diseases for the Member States, plus monthly BSE reports for the United Kingdom and Portugal, along with test reports; OIE for the other countries.
C 324/8 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 20.11.2001 10. 
C 324/8 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20.11.2001 10.
Pr. marts 2001 er der konstateret BSE-tilfžlde i alle medlemsstaterne undtagen fire, nemlig Żstrig, Finland og Sverige, som af Den Videnskabelige Styringskomit er klassificeret som lande, hvor BSE-forekomst er usandsynlig, men ikke udelukket, og Gržkenland, som ikke har fet foretaget en geografisk BSE-risikovurdering (jf. punkt 23 og bilag 1). 
As at March 2001, BSE had been reported in all Member States except four Ń Austria, Finland, Sweden, which have been classified by the Scientific Steering Committee as countries where BSE is unlikely, but not excluded, and Greece, for which there is no geographical BSE risk assessment (see paragraph 23 and Annex 1).
KOMMISSIONENS BSE-STRATEGI De centrale elementer i Kommissionens BSE-strategi 11. 
THE COMMISSIONŐS BSE STRATEGY Main elements of the CommissionŐs BSE strategy 11.
De hidtil gennemfżrte BSE-foranstaltninger tager sigte p at forhindre, at materiale, som muligvis er inficeret med BSE, indgr i foder-eller fżdekžden (1). 
The BSE measures implemented to date aim to eliminate possibly BSE-infected matter from entering the animal feed or the human food chain (1).
Figur 5 er en oversigt over de BSE-foranstaltninger, som er truffet eller foreslet af Kommissionen, og som skal gennemfżres af medlemsstaterne. 
The BSE measures taken or proposed by the Commission for implementation by the Member States are summarised at Figure 5.
Ud over at tržffe disse specifikke foranstaltninger til BSE-risikostyring omorgani-serede Kommissionen sine tjenester og traf fżlgende foranstaltninger: a) b) c) d) e) Ansvaret for fżdevaresikkerhed og veterinžrkontrol er blevet udskilt fra Generaldirektoratet for Landbrugs afdeling for markedsforvaltning og placeret i et sžrligt direktorat med ansvar for sundhed og forbrugerbeskyttelse. De forskellige rdgivende videnskabelige komiter er blevet samlet under Generaldirektoratet for Sundhed og Forbrugerbeskyttelse. 
In addition to these specific BSE risk management measures, the Commission reorganised its services and took the following action: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) responsibility for food safety and veterinary inspection is clearly separated from the market management division of the Agriculture Directorate-General (DG AGRI), in a separate directorate with responsibility for health and consumer protection (DG SANCO); the various consultative scientific committees have been brought together under DG SANCO.
Der er blevet oprettet en Videnskabelig Styringskomit (VSK), som skal beskžftige sig med spżrgsml om forbrugersundhed og fżdevaresikkerhed. 
A scientific steering committee (SSC) has been created to oversee matters concerning consumer health and food safety.
VSK stżttes af en ad hoc-gruppe, der arbejder med BSE. Kommissionen har afsat ca. 
The SSC is supported by an ad-hoc group dealing with BSE; theCommissionhasprovidedapproximately50millioneuro for research into transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs).
50 millioner euro til forskning i overfżrbare spongiforme encephalopatier, og desuden har medlemsstaterne forskningsprojekter i gang. Kommissionen har foreslet, at der oprettes en Europžisk Fżdevaremyndighed (2). Endvidere har den forelagt et forslag til en forordning om sundhedsbestemmelser for animalske biprodukter, som ikke er bestemt til konsum, og et forslag til en forordning, som fastlžgger rammerne for BSE-strategiens foranstaltninger (jf. punkt 18). 
This is in addition to Member StatesŐ ongoing research projects; the Commission has proposed the creation of a European food authority (2), a Regulation laying down detailed rules for dealing with animal by-products not intended for human consumption and a Regulation to provide a framework for the BSE strategy measures (see paragraph18); the Commission has followed a policy of openness by making scientific opinions and reports, and the inspection reports of the Food and Veterinary Office (after discussion with Member States) publicly available on the Internet.
(1) 2 ( ) Der gives derimod dispensation i forbindelse med anvendelse af materiale fra kvžg i lžgemidler og farmaceutiske produkter, hvor industrien er selvregulerende, idet den har en adfžrdskodeks, som anbefaler opsżgning af sikre rmaterialer. 
(1) 2 ( ) In contrast, derogations are applied for the use of bovine matter in medical/pharmaceutical products, where the industry is self regulatory, in that it has a code of good practice which recommends safe sourcing of raw materials.
Det endelige produkts art gżr det vanskeligt at kontrollere det anvendte rmateriale, og det er slet ikke fastsat, at det skal kontrolleres, om reglerne for opsżgning og forarbejdning er blevet overholdt. 
The nature of the end product makes it difficult to verify the raw material used, and indeed, there is no regulatory requirement to check that safe sourcing or processing has in fact been applied.
Hvidbog om fżdevaresikkerhed (KOM(1999) 719 endelig af 12. januar 2000). 
White Paper on Food Safety, COM(1999) 719 final of 12 January 2000.
20.11.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 324/9 Vžsentlige begivenheder BSE-overvgning 7/00: SSC fastsžtter GBR for alle MS undtagen EL. 
20.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 324/9 Source: Court of Auditors review of BSE legislation and Commission DG SANCO documents.
Udsmeltningsmetoder 7/94: Kommissionens beslutning 94/382 fastsžtter standarder for udsmeltning fra 1.1.1995. 
Dec. 94/382 sets rendering standards from 1/1/95.
7/97: Kommissionens beslutning 97/534 forbyder brug af SRM fra 1/98. 
7/97:Commission decision 534/97 prohibition of use of SRMs from 1/98.
3/98: Gennemfżrelse af 97/534 udsat til 1/98. 6/00: 97/534 ophžves og erstattes med Kommissionens beslutning 2000/418; SRM-liste udvides. 
3/98: 534/97 implementation postponed to 1/98 6/00:534/97repealed and replaced by Com.Dec.
12/00:SRM-liste udvides. 
418/00;SRM definition extended.
C 324/10 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 20.11.2001 13. 
C 324/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20.11.2001 13.
Fra 1998 til begyndelsen af den nuvžrende krise i slutningen af 2000 blev der ikke truffet nogen markedsforanstaltninger ud over dem, der er beskrevet i Rettens sžrberetning. 
No market measures other than those described in the CourtŐs Special Report were introduced between 1998 and the start of the current crisis in late 2000.
Medio 2000 var oksekżdsmarkedet, meget hurtigere end forventet, kommet p fode igen efter BSE-krisen i 1996-1997 (1). 
By mid-2000, the beef and veal market had recovered from the 1996 to 1997 BSE crisis much quicker than expected (1).
Forbruget var faktisk stżrre end fżr krisen, priserne var de hżjeste i fem r, og der var ingen interventionslagre. 
By mid 2000 consumption was actually higher than before the crisis, prices were at their highest in five years, and there were no intervention stocks.
Den anden krise begyndte i efterret 2000, fżrst og fremmest i Frankrig, hvor den konstaterede forekomst af BSE steg som fżlge af omfattende BSE-undersżgelser (jf. punkt 19). 
The second crisis started in autumn 2000, first of all in France, where the reported BSE incidence was increasing, due to wide-scale BSE testing (see paragraph 19).
Bde okse-kżdsforbruget og -priserne faldt hurtigt. 
Both consumption and prices of beef fell quickly.
Medlemsstaterne konstaterede flere tilfžlde af BSE, da det nye BSE-undersżgelsesprogram blev gennemfżrt, og forbrugernes tillid faldt yderligere, da de fżrste tilfžlde blev konstateret i nogle forarbejdningsvirksomheders egne dyrehold i Spanien, Tyskland og Italien. 
More BSE cases were reported by the Member States as the new BSE testing programme was implemented, and consumer confidence was further eroded by the first reported cases in domestic herds in Spain, Germany and Italy.
En ržkke medlemsstater indfżrte hurtigt ensidige forbud mod indfżrsel af levende kvžg og oksekżdsprodukter fra de ramte lande, og det samme gjorde et antal tredjelande og nogle af kandidatlandene. 
Individual Member States quickly imposed unilateral bans on imports of live cattle and bovine products from affected countries, and these were joined by non-member countries and some of the EU candidate countries.
Pr. januar 2001, fżr mund-og klovsygen brżd ud, var oksekżdspriserne faldet med over 25 % (2) siden oktober 2000. 
By January 2001, before the foot-and-mouth disease, beef prices had fallen by over 25 % (2) since October 2000.
Som reaktion p krisen foreslog Kommissionen veterinžre foranstaltninger, som tog sigte p at żge beskyttelsen af folkesundheden og genopbygge forbrugernes tillid (undersżgelse af dyr p over 30 mneder slagtet til menneskefżde, midlertidigt forbud mod anvendelse af kżd-og benmel til alle husdyr). 
In response to the crisis, the Commission proposed veterinary measures aimed at increasing public health protection, and restoring consumer confidence (testing of animals over 30 months intended for human consumption, temporary ban on the use of MBM for all farm animals).
Den foreslog ogs markedsforanstaltninger, som tog sigte p at nedbringe produktionen af oksekżd og yde stżtte til producenterne. 
It also proposed market measures aimed at reducing the production of beef and providing support to producers.
Gennem disse foranstaltninger skal der fjernes 1,3 millioner ton oksekżd fra markedet i 2001 ved hjžlp af interventionsoplagring og ordningerne for opkżb til destruktion eller oplagring. 
These measures envisage removing 1,3 million tonnes of beef from the market in 2001 through intervention storage and the purchase for destruction or storage schemes.
Nettoudgif-terne p EU-budgettet til disse foranstaltninger skżnnes at ville andrage 2 200 millioner euro i perioden 2001-2006 (3). 
The net cost of these measures to the EU budget is estimated at 2 200 million euro over the period 2001 to 2006 (3).
Kommissionen har beregnet, at det er mere omkostningseffektivt at destruere dyr under ordningen for opkżb til destruktion (udgifter for fžllesskabsbudgettet: 1 260 euro pr. ton), end det er at oplagre dem p interventionslagre (udgifter p fžllesskabsbudgettet: 2 860 (4) euro pr. ton). 
The Commission has calculated that it is more cost effective to destroy animals under the purchase for destruction scheme (cost to Community budget: 1 260 euro per tonne) than to put them into intervention storage (cost to Community budget 2 860 (4) euro per tonne).
Ikke desto mindre er de samlede omkostninger i forbindelse med BSE-krisen hżje. 
None the less, the total cost of the BSE crisis is high.
Den nuvžrende situation er beskrevet i rapporten ČProspects for Agricultural markets 2000-2007Ç 2 (Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug, november 2000). () Prisfald fra uge 42 (oktober) 2000 til uge 5 (udgangen af januar) 2001: ungtyre AR3 27 %, kżer DO3 28 %, kvier 16 %, stude CR3 2 %. 
Updated situation is from report ÔProspects for agricultural markets 2000 to 2007Ő, 2 Directorate-General for Agriculture, November 2000. () Drop in prices between week 42 (October) 2000 and week 5 (end of January) 2001: beefmeat young bulls AR3 27 %; cows DO3 28 %; heifers 16 %; steers CR3 2 %.
Kilde: Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug, arbejdsdokument: Markeds-3 situationen for oksekżd og levende dyr. () Skżnnede omkostninger 2001-2006: 3 500 millioner euro Skżnnede besparelser som fżlge af foranstaltninger til nedbringelse af oksekżdsproduktionen: 1 300 millioner euro 4 Skżnnet nettoudgift: 2 200 millioner euro. () Kommissionen antager i sin beregning, at det fremover vil vžre umuligt at sžlge sdant interventionsoksekżd. 
Source : DG AGRI working document Ń Market situation for bovine 3 meat and live animals. () Estimated cost from 2001 to 2006: 3 500 million euro; estimated savings from measures to reduce beef production: 1 300 million euro; 4 net estimated cost: 2 200 million euro. () The Commission calculation assumes that such beef in intervention will be impossible to sell in the future.
Dermed stiger de skżnnede udgifter pr. ton i interventionslagre med 800 euro. 1 748 000 dyr er stżtteberettigede i henhold til destruktionsord-ningen, og i adskillige r har EU gennem de forskellige oksekżds-pržmieordninger betalt stżtte for bde disse dyr og de dyr, der forarbejdes med henblik p oplagring. 
This has added 800 euro to the estimated cost per tonne of intervention storage. the destruction scheme, and the animals processed for storage, have been subsidised by the EU for several years through the various beef premium schemes.
Dyrene kan ikke sžlges, men producenten taber ikke penge p dem, da medlemsstatens godtgżrelse er baseret p dyrenes markedsvžrdi fżr krisen, og EU betaler 70 % af godtgżrelsen. 
The animal becomes unsaleable but the producer does not lose out on the animal concerned, as Member StatesŐ compensation is based on the market value of the animal before the crisis, and the EU contributes 70 % of this.
BSE-krisen giver anledning til at overveje, hvordan stżtten i oksekżdssektoren kan omlžgges, s produktionsstżtten afskaffes, samtidig med at landbrugerne sikres en rimelig levestandard. 
The BSE crisis raises the question of how to reorient subsidy payments in the beef and veal sector away from production, while at the same time respecting the need to provide a reasonable standard of living to farmers.
Retsgrundlaget for EUŐs hidtidige BSE-foranstaltninger 17. 
Legislative basis for BSE measures taken by the EU to date 17.
De vžsentligste retsakter om forebyggelse af BSE var allerede blevet vedtaget af Kommissionen, inden den fżrste BSE-krise begyndte i 1996 (5) (jf. figur 5). 
The major BSE prevention legislation had already been passed by the Commission before the start of the first BSE crisis in 1996 (5) (see Figure 5).
De gžldende BSE-foranstaltninger er alle baseret p de veterinžre sikkerhedsklausuler, som normalt bżr vžre midlertidige og bygge p videnskabelige kriterier, og Kommissionen har vedtaget dem i medfżr af de befżjelser, den har fet overdraget af Rdet. 
The current BSE measures are all based on the veterinary safeguard clauses, which should normally be temporary and based on scientific criteria, and are adopted under the powers delegated to the Commission by the Council.
Med det forml at sikre BSE-foranstaltningerne et gyldigt retsgrundlag fremsatte Kommissionen i januar 1999 et forslag til en forordning om overfżrbare spongiforme encephalopatier (TSEŐer) (6), som fastlžgger rammerne for de BSE-foranstaltninger, som er vedtaget til dato, og indfżrer regler vedrżrende handel, forarbejdede biprodukter, udryddelse af BSE og forekomsten af andre TSEŐer. 
In order to provide a proper legal basis for the BSE measures, in January 1999 the Commission submitted a proposal for a Regulation on transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) (6) which provides a framework for the BSE measures passed to date as well as rules for trade, secondary processed products, BSE eradication, and any other emerging TSEs.
Den vžsentligste forskel i forhold til den gžldende lovgivning er, at foranstaltningerne vil afhžnge af den konstaterede BSE-status i svel medlemsstater som lande, der eksporterer til EU (jf. bilag 1). 
The main difference with current legislation is that measures would depend on the BSE status of the Member States and countries exporting to the EU (see Annex 1).
Det tager imidlertid lang tid at f vedtaget forordninger efter den fžlles beslutningsprocedure p grund af de forsinkelser, der opstr i de to institutioner Ń forordningen blev fżrst undertegnet i maj 2001 (7), 27 mneder efter fremsžttelsen af forslaget. 
However, adoption of Regulations by the co-decision procedure is slow owing to delays in the institutions concerned Ń the Regulation was signed in May 2001 (7), 27 months after the proposal was first made.
Epidemiologisk overvgning 19. 
Epidemio-surveillance 19.
Overvgning (8) omfatter registrering af forekomsten af BSE og identificering af dyr, som er udsat for smittefare. Formlet er (5) De vžsentligste retsakter om forebygning af BSE var 1994-forbuddet mod opfodring af drżvtyggere med kżd-og benmel fra pattedyr og fastsžttelsen af normer for behandling af animalsk affald med det for-6 ml at reducere smittefaren (1994-1997). () KOM(1998) 623 endelig Ń 98/0323 (COD) (EFT C 45 af 19.2.1999, 7 s. 
Surveillance (8) involves identifying the incidence of BSE and animals at risk of being infected, to ensure that appropriate risk 5 () The major BSE prevention legislation was the 1994 ban on feeding mammalian derived MBM to ruminants and treatment of animal 6 waste to reduce infectiveness between 1994 and 1997. () COM(98) 623 final Ń C4-0025/1999 Ń 1998/0323 (COD) 7 (OJ C 45, 19.2.1999, p.
2). () Europa-Parlamentets og Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 999/2001 af 22. maj 2001 om fastsžttelse af regler for forebyggelse af, kontrol med og udryddelse af visse transmissible spongiforme encephalopa-8 tier (EFT L 147 af 31.5.2001, s. 
2). () Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalo-8 pathies (OJ L 147, 31.5.2001, p.
1). () Passiv overvgning er kontrol af kreaturer, som mistžnkes for at have BSE og er registreret som sdan, fordi de har kliniske symptomer, der kan skyldes BSE. 
1). () Passive surveillance is control of notified BSE suspects i.e. cattle that are notified because of clinical signs compatible with BSE.
Aktiv overvgning er test af kreaturer, som ikke er mistžnkt og registreret, men som tilhżrer delpopulationer af hżjrisi-kodyr. 
Active surveillance is testing of cattle that are not notified as BSE suspects but belong to risk sub-populations.
20.11.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 324/11 at sikre, at der ivžrksžttes egnede risikostyringsprocedurer. 
20.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 324/11 management procedures are taken.
I dag kan BSE kun bekržftes efter dyrets dżd. 
Currently, BSE can only be confirmed after the death of an animal.
Indtil Kommissionen i 1999 indfżrte tre diagnostiske hurtigtest (1), som foretages efter slagtning p dyr p over 30 mneder, kunne BSE kun bekržftes ved en forholdsvis besvžrlig laboratorieundersżgelse af hjer-nen. 
Until the introduction of three rapid post-mortem diagnostic tests (1) for animals over 30 months in 1999, BSE could only be confirmed by a relatively cumbersome laboratory analysis of the brain.
Ifżlge Kommissionen kan disse hurtigtest ikke pvise BSE tidligt i inkubationsperioden, og et negativt testresultat er ingen garanti for, at BSE-agenset ikke findes i det undersżgte dyr (2). 
According to the Commission, these rapid tests cannot identify BSE infected animals early in the incubation period nor can a negative result guarantee the absence of the BSE agent in an individual animal tested (2).
Kommissionen indfżrte fżrst obligatorisk epidemiologisk overvgning af alle animalske TSEŐer (3) i 1998. Grundlaget var de mindstekrav til overvgning, som Det Internationale Kontor for Epizootier (OIE) anbefalede. 
The Commission only introduced compulsory epidemiological surveillance for all animal TSEs (3) in 1998, based on the minimum requirements recommended by the World Organisation for Animal Health (Office International des Epizooties (OIE)).
I begyndelsen skulle der kun undersżges et forholdsvis begržnset antal hjerner. 
Initially, a relatively limited number of brains were required to be tested.
Efter godkendelsen af de diagnostiske hurtigtest i 1999 blev overvgningsprogram-merne forbedret i juni 2000, sledes at der skulle foretages omfattende undersżgelser af hżjrisikodyr (4), og det blev fastlagt, at der skulle oprettes nationale referencelaboratorier, og at undersżgel-sesprotokollerne skulle ajourfżres i overensstemmelse med OIEŐs anbefalinger (5). 
After the rapid diagnostic tests were approved in 1999, the monitoring programmes were improved in June 2000 to extensively test at-risk animals (4), to establish the national reference laboratories and strengthen protocols for testing following OIE recommendations(5).
Disse foranstaltninger skulle gennemfżres i januar 2001, men da den anden krise opstod, blev undersżgelsespro-grammet udvidet endnu engang. 
These measures were due to be implemented in January 2001, but following the start of the crisis, the testing programme was again extended.
Siden januar 2001 har alle kreaturer over 30 mneder skullet undersżges, hvis de er slagtet til menneskefżde (undtagen dyr slagtet i Żstrig, Finland og Sverige til de nationale markeder) eller nżdslagtet. 
As of January 2001, all bovines over 30 months, slaughtered for human consumption (except in Austria, Finland or Sweden and intended only for their national market), or presented for emergency slaughter must be tested.
Desuden skal der foretages stikprżveundersżgelser af kreaturer over 30 mneder, der er dżde p bedriften (6). 
In addition, dead-on-farm bovine animals over 30 months of age must be tested at random (6).
Fra januar til februar 2001 blev der foretaget over 900 000 hurtigtest i EU. 
Between January and February 2001, over 900 000 rapid tests were carried out across the EU.
Det hidtil konstaterede antal BSE-tilfžlde er sandsynligvis for lavt, for passiv overvgning (7) resulterer ikke altid i, at der pvises tilfžlde, der giver anledning til mistanke om BSE, og hvor disse kreaturer undersżges. 
The number of BSE cases in the past is likely to have been under-reported, as passive surveillance (7) may not lead to identification and testing of suspect cases.
Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret har under sine inspektioner bemžrket, at den epidemiologiske overvgning er svag i alle de besżgte medlemsstater (jf. figur 6 og bilag 2). Det konkluderede, at der sandsynligvis fandtes BSE i medlemsstater, som endnu ikke havde konstateret nogen tilfžlde (Tyskland, Italien, Spanien) (8), og at den faktiske forekomst af BSE i andre medlemsstater sandsynligvis var hżjere end den, de ansvarlige myndigheder havde angivet. 
The FVO inspections have noted weak epidemio-surveillance of BSE in all the Member States visited (see Figure 6 and Annex 2), and have concluded that BSE probably existed in Member States which had yet to report any cases (Germany, Italy, Spain) (8), and that in other Member States, the real rate of BSE was probably higher than that being reported by the competent authorities.