natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nr der ikke er juridisk vished, underrettes inspektżrerne ikke systematisk, hvis de tjenester, der er ansvarlige for databehandlingen, konstaterer afvigelser, der er stżrre end tolerancemargenen. 
Also, in the absence of legal certainty, inspectors are not systematically notified when deviations in excess of the tolerance margin are detected by the departments responsible for processing catch data.
(1) Kun salg fra auktioner tages i betragtning, selv om en meget stor del af fangsterne (over 20 % af de landede mžngder) ikke sžlges p auk-tion. 
(1) Only auction sale figures taken into account, although a very substantial proportion of sales (more than 20 % of quantities landed) were not auction sales.
(2) Dataene fra auktioner indbefatter salg af varer, der er landet i en anden medlemsstat, og som derfor bżr indberettes til Kommissionen af denne medlemsstat og ikke af Frankrig. 
(2) The auction data include sales of produce landed in another Member State which must therefore be reported to the Commission by that Member State, and not by France.
Afslutningsvis har Retten i alle de besżgte medlemsstater kunnet identificere usždvanlige forhold i forbindelse med opgżrelserne (3) p grund af de mangler ved valideringssystemerne, som ikke var opdaget, eller som der ikke var gjort noget ved. 
Finally, in all the Member States visited, shortcomings in the validation systems made it possible for the Court to discover declaration anomalies (3) that had not been detected or dealt with.
Manglende integration og harmonisering p fžllesskabsplan De forskellige medlemsstaters systemer fungerer kun i meget begržnset omfang sammen, og det gżr kontrollerne ufuldstžndige 37. 
Lack of integration and harmonisation at Community level Very limited inter-operability between the systems of the different Member States adversely affects the completeness of controls. 37.
De forskellige nationale systemer til indsamling af fangstdata fungerer ikke sammen og er ikke indbyrdes forbundne, og det mindsker mulighederne for kontrol og begržnser dermed valideringssystemernes effektivitet. 
The lack of inter-operability and inter-connection between the different national systems for collecting catch data reduces the opportunities for checking, and thus limits the extent of the validation systemsŐ effectiveness.
Nr fżrste salg foregr i et andet land end flagstaten eller det land, hvor fisken blev landet, er det f.eks. ikke muligt automatisk at sammenholde dataene i salgsnotaen med dataene i logbogen og landingsopgżrelsen (4). 
For example, in the case of first sale in a country other than the flag state or country of landing, it is not possible to perform an automatic control by cross-checking the sales note data, on the one hand, against the data in the logbook and the landing declaration on the other hand (4).
De nationale tilpasningskoefficienter er upržcise og inkonsekvente 38. 
National conversion factors imprecise and inconsistent 38.
TAC og kvoter fastsžttes i ton udtrykt i levende vžgt, dvs. som hele fisk og p fangsttidspunktet. 
TAC and quotas are set in tonnes expressed as live-weight equivalent (LWE), i.e. whole fish at the time of catch.
Til gengžld anvendes der nettovžgt i de opgżrelser, der bruges til kontrol af fangsten (5). 
On the other hand, in the declaration documents used as reference material for monitoring catches (5), it is the net weight that is used.
Differencen mellem de to mžngdeangivelser skyldes isžr, at fisken skžres ud om bord p fiskerfartżjet. 
The difference between the two units is mainly due to the fish being cut up on board ship.
De bygger p tidligere praksis (6), og dataene er aldrig blevet valideret omhyggeligt, men er ofte forskellige fra medlemsstat til medlemsstat. 
They are based on long established data (6) which were never rigorously validated, and often differed from one Member State to another.
Det medfżrer, at de validerede fangsttal er upržcise og med ubegrundede og undertiden vžsentlige differencer mellem de tonnager, der tages i betragtning ved overvgningen af kvoterne, alt efter om landingen har fundet sted i en medlemsstat eller i en anden (7). 
The result is lack of precision in validated catch figures and unjustified, and sometimes significant, differences between the tonnages used to monitor quotas, depending on whether landing took place in one country rather than another (7).
(3) Navnlig at der er afvigelser mellem mžngderne angivet i landingsopgżrelserne og/eller salgsnotaerne og mžngderne angivet i logbżgerne, der overstiger den tolerancemargen, der er fastsat i forordningen. 
(3) In particular, the existence of differences in excess of the tolerance laid down in the regulations between the quantities mentioned in the landing declarations and/or sales notes and those shown in the logbooks.
2847/93 skal der indgives logbog og landingsopgżrelse bde til de kompetente myndigheder i den medlemsstat, hvor landingen finder sted, og til myndighederne i flagsta-ten, men salgsnotaen skal kun indgives til de kompetente myndigheder i den medlemsstat, p hvis omrde den fżrste markedsfżring foretages. 
(4) Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 provides that copies of the logbook and landing declaration are to be sent both to the authorities of the State where landing takes place and to the flag state, but the sales note is to be sent only to the competent authorities of the Member State in whose territory the first marketing takes place.
(5) Landingsopgżrelser og salgsnotaer. 
(5) Landing declarations and sales notes.
(6) Inden indfżrelsen af fžllesskabsordningen med TAC og kvoter. 
(6) Before the Community TAC and quota system was put in place.
(7) 100 kg frisk, renset torsk vil svare til en kvoteudnyttelse p 124 kg, hvis fisken landes i Frankrig, og til 111 kg, hvis den landes i Litauen. 100 kg frisk havtaske renset/uden hoved vil svare til en kvoteudnyttelse p 250 kg i Sverige og til 325 kg i Tyskland. 
(7) 100 kg of gutted fresh cod will correspond to quota uptake of 124 kg if landed in France, and 111 kg in Lithuania; 100 kg of gutted/headed fresh anglerfish will correspond to a quota uptake of 250 kg if landed in Sweden and 325 kg in Germany.
28.12.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 317/11 Alvorlige problemer med sporbarhed i to af de besżgte medlemsstater 39. 
28.12.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 317/11 Serious traceability problems 39.
I to af de besżgte medlemsstater er dataenes sporbarhed ikke sikret, dvs. at det ikke har vžret muligt at kontrollere, at de samlede data, der er fremsendt til Kommissionen, svarer til summen af alle validerede data. 
The traceability of data was not assured in two of the countries visited, that is to say, it was not possible to verify whether the consolidated data forwarded to the Commission actually corresponded to the sum of the individual validated data.
I to af de syv fangstopgżrelser vedrżrende de landede mžngder var der angivet en havn i en anden region. 
Of the seven catch declarations that provided evidence of the quantities landed, two showed a port in another region.
Det var ikke muligt ved analyse af FOS-signalerne at finde frem til fartżjernes pržcise position p den anfżrte landingsdato (2). 
Analysis of VMS signals did not provide any information about the exact location of the vessels in question on the landing date shown (2).
(1) 262,9 mod 431,9 tusinde tons, eller en afvigelse p 169,0 tusinde tons. 
(1) 262,9 thousand tonnes against 431,9 thousand tonnes, a difference of 169,0 thousand tonnes.
(2) To af fartżjerne var ikke udstyret med FOS, og der var ikke modtaget noget signal fra de fem andre p den dato, landingen fandt sted (i et tilfžlde havde fartżjet ikke udsendt signaler i mere end tre r inden den anfżrte landingsdato, og i et andet tilfžlde i over to r). 
(2) In fact, two of the vessels were not equipped with this system, and in the case of the five others no signal was received on the day of the landing (in one case the vessel had not emitted any signals for more than three years before the landing date shown, and in another case for more than two years).
Ingen af de besżgte medlemsstater har gennemfżrt en samlet revision af systemerne til indsamling og validering af fangstdata med henblik p at evaluere kvaliteten af edb-applikationerne. 
40. None of the Member States visited had carried out a comprehensive audit of the catch data collection and validation systems to evaluate the quality of the IT applications.
Dertil kommer, at de data, der stammer fra disse systemer, og som er blevet fremsendt til Kommissionen, aldrig er blevet attesteret af et uafhžngigt organ. 
Similarly, the data produced by the systems and forwarded to the Commission had never been subject to a procedure involving certification by an independent body.
I den oprindelige udgave af kontrolforordningen (3) var det dog fastsat, at hver medlemsstat inden et r efter ikrafttrždelsen af forordningen skulle forelžgge en rapport for Kommissionen, hvori det blev beskrevet, hvordan oplysningerne indsamledes og efterprżvedes, og hvor plidelige de var. 
In the original version of the Regulation on control (3), however, it was stipulated that in the year following the entry into force of the Regulation, each Member State was to submit to the Commission a report describing the way in which data are collected and verified, and specifying the reliability of such data.
Denne forpligtelse er ikke blevet bibeholdt i senere udgaver af forordningen (4). 
This obligation was not retained in later versions of the text (4).
(3) Forordning (EŻF) nr. 2847/93, artikel 19, stk. 
(3) Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93, Article 19(5).
5. (4) Forordning (EF) nr. 2846/98, artikel 1, nr. 
(4) Regulation (EC) No 2846/98, Article 1(13)(c).
C 317/12 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 28.12.2007 Kommissionen er bevidst om denne situation 42. 
C 317/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 28.12.2007 The Commission is aware of this situation.
Kommissionen ved godt, at nogle af de data, den modtager, er usikre og har allerede offentligt udtalt sig herom (1). 
42. The Commission is aware of the unreliable quality of the data that it receives (1), and it has already said so publicly.
Ikke desto mindre er det disse usikre data, Kommissionen bruger i sine bestržbelser for at forebygge kvoteoverskridelser og, nr det ikke lykkes, udstede sanktioner. 
Nevertheless it is these data of unreliable quality that are being used by the Commission in trying to prevent and, where appropriate, penalise quota overruns.
Kommissionens overvgning er ikke tilstržkkelig 44. 
Insufficient Commission monitoring 44.
Medlemsstaterne er hovedansvarlige for forvaltningen og overvgningen af deres kvoter. De skal tržffe de nżdvendige foranstaltninger for at undg, at kvoterne overskrides, f.eks. ved om nżdvendigt at lukke for fiskeri af de berżrte arter. 
As the Member States have primary responsibility for managing and monitoring their quotas, it is they who must take the necessary steps to avoid quota overruns, if necessary by closing the fisheries concerned.
Det er Kommissionens opgave at sikre sig, at medlemsstaterne overholder deres forpligtelser. 
It is for the Commission, for its part, to verify that the Member States fulfil their obligations.
Med henblik herp har den mulighed for p eget initiativ at indfżre et fiskeristop (2). 
For this purpose it has the possibility of halting fishing for a particular stock on its own initiative (2).
Et utilstržkkeligt informationssystem 45. 
Information system unsatisfactory 45.
Det informationssystem, som hver mned forsyner Kommissionen med fangstdata fra medlemsstaterne, er p flere mder mangelfuldt. 
There are a number of shortcomings in the information system through which the Commission receives monthly the catch data prepared by the Member States.
For det fżrste er de fremsendte oplysninger, som anfżrt ovenfor, usikre. 
Firstly, as stated above, the quality of the information forwarded is unreliable.
For det andet overholder ikke alle medlemsstater systematisk tidsfristen for fremsendelse af rapporter, hvilket begržnser Kommissionens reaktionsevne. 
Secondly, not all Member States systematically forward their reports within the specified deadlines, thereby reducing the CommissionŐs scope for reaction.
Og fordi oplysningerne kumuleres i rets lżb, er det ikke muligt at foretage over-ensstemmelsestest og sammenligne bestemte perioder fra et r til det nžste eller identificere forsinkelser i behandlingen. Da visse simple logiske test ikke foretages, er det endelig ikke muligt med det samme at identificere visse, selv grove, usždvanlige forhold i forbindelse med opgżrelserne (3). 
Moreover, since the information is cumulative over the year, it is possible neither to test the consistency of data from one year to the next over specified periods, nor to identify processing delays. Lastly, in the absence of some simple logical tests it is not possible to identify even gross misstatements in declarations immediately (3).
Kommissionen sammenholder ikke de data, GD FISH fr tilsendt inden for rammerne af gennemfżrelsen af fiskeripolitik-ken, med data af samme art, som Eurostat (4) har modtaget, og som i nogle tilfžlde er meget forskellige fra GD FISHŐs data. 
Absence of data quality evaluation 46. Data are forwarded to DG Fish as part of fisheries policy implementation, but the Commission does not cross-check them against similar data received through Eurostat (4), which in some cases are significantly different.
Kommissionen har siden 1999 haft adgang til kopier af de nationale edb-filer (5). 
Since 1999 the Commission has had a right of access to duplicates of national IT files (5).
Den burde sledes kunne vurdere kvaliteten af de oplysninger, den modtager. 
This facility should enable it to evaluate the quality of the data forwarded to it.
Den har imidlertid fżrst i 2007 rettet en fżrste henvendelse til medlemsstaterne om at f adgang til fangstdata. 
It was not until 2007, however, that it sent its first request on the subject of catch data to the Member States.
Kommissionen forklarer, at den har brugt denne mulighed meget lidt, fordi dens kontrol-og inspektionsenheder ikke havde tilstržkkeligt personale med egentlig knowhow om dataanalyse, -behandling og -kontrol. 
The Commission attributes the low utilisation of this facility to the fact that its control and inspection units do not have sufficient staff with real data analysis, processing and control skills.
2005 almindelig tun (BFT) Medlemsstat Frankrig Italien Spanien (i ton) Tabel 2 Eksempler p differencer mellem GD FISH-data og Eurostat-data Kvote 6 983 4 888 5 857 GD FISH-data Eurostat-data 8 936 4 879 5 850 tons 9 726 Đ 791 4 272 607 5 650 200 % Đ 8,8 % 12,4 % 3,4 % Difference (1) I Compliance Scoreboard 2005 (resultatliste), s. 
2005 bluefin tuna (BFT) Member State France Italy Spain Difference (tonnes) % Đ 8,8 % 12,4 % 3,4 % Table 2 Examples of differences between DG Fish data and Eurostat data Quota 6 983 4 888 5 857 DG FISH data 8 936 4 879 5 850 Eurostat Data tonnes 9 726 Đ 791 4 272 607 5 650 200 (1) The Compliance Scoreboard 2005, p.
12, skriver Kommissionen, at de data, medlemsstaterne har fremsendt til Kommissionen, bygger p fartżjsejernes eller deres agenters angivelser af fangster og landinger. 
12, states, ÔThe data forwarded by Member States to the Commission is based on the declarations of catches and landings made by vessel owners or agents.
Kommissionen er af den opfattelse, at disse data muligvis ikke altid afspejler virkeligheden. 
The Commission believes that this data may not always reflect reality.
Det er allerede gentagne gange blevet understreget i videnskabelige rapporter, at forkerte eller under-drevne angivelser af fangster eller landinger kan gżre de meget vigtige vurderinger af bestandene forkerte, og denne mistanke stżttes af de bemžrkninger, Kommissionens inspektżrer har fremsat i en rržkke. http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/control_enforcement/scoreboard/ar-chives/scoreboard2005/management_en.htm (2) Forordning (EŻF) nr. 2847/93, artikel 21, stk. 
Scientific reports have repeatedly emphasised the possibility that misreporting or underreporting of catches or landings may negatively impact the accuracy of vital stock assessments, and this suspicion is supported by the observations made by Commission inspectors over a number of years.Ő http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/control_enforcement/score-board/archives/scoreboard2005/management_en.htm (2) Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93, Article 21(3).
(3) I 2005 kunne de italienske myndigheder sledes angive fangst af almindelig tun, der er underlagt en kvote, i en rubrik for fiskearter, der ikke er underlagt en kvote. 
(3) In 2005 the Italian authorities were thus able to declare catches of bluefin tuna, a quota species, under the heading of non-quota species.
1382/91 af 21.5.1991 om fremsendelse af data vedrżrende landinger af fiskerivarer i medlemsstaterne (EFT L 133 af 28.5.1991, s. 
(4) Council Regulation (EEC) No 1382/91 of 21 May 1991 on the submission of data on the landings of fishery products in Member States (OJ L 133, 28.5.1991, p.
2846/98 af 17.12.1998 om žndring af forordning (EŻF) nr. 
(5) Council Regulation (EC) No 2846/98 of 17 December 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p.
28.12.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 317/13 Begržnset overvgning 48. 
28.12.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 317/13 Limited monitoring 48.
Det alarm-og overvgningssystem, Kommissionen har indfżrt, gr ud p, at kvotemžngden for kvoterede bestande (1) automatisk sammenlignes med de indberettede fangster. 
For each of the stocks subject to quota (1) the early warning and monitoring system established by the Commission consists of automatic comparison of quota totals and reported catches.
Nr kvoteudnyttelsen nžrmer sig en bestemt tžrskel, sendes der en alarm-meddelelse til medlemsstaten, der anmodes om at meddele Kommissionen, hvilke foranstaltninger den agter at tržffe. 
When the uptake level reaches a predefined limit, a warning notice is sent to the Member State concerned, inviting it to forward information about the action that it intends to take.
Forsinkelserne i forbindelse med fangstopgżrelserne og i overvgningen af udvekslingen af kvoter medlemsstaterne imellem, de sžrlige betingelser (2), som gżr processen endnu mere kompliceret, mulighederne for kompensation, overfżrsel af kvoter til det fżlgende r eller vejet nedsžttelse af nžste rs kvote samtidig med, at der kun er afsat f menneskelige ressourcer, bevirker alt sammen, at denne procedure bliver mindre effektiv, end den kunne have vžret. 
The delays affecting catch declarations and the monitoring of quota trading between Member States, together with the complexity engendered by the existence of special conditions (2), possibilities for compensation, carryovers or proportionate deductions the following year and under various conditions, as well as the low volume of human resources assigned to this procedure, all combine to weaken the effectiveness of this procedure.
I 2005 har det ikke vžret muligt ved hjžlp af systemet at undg officiel overskridelse af 26 kvoter, og heraf var 11 overskridelser vžsentlige (3). 
In 2005, the system did not prevent 26 quotas from being officially exceeded, 11 of them significantly so (3).
Begržnsede aktionsmuligheder 50. 
Limited scope for action 50.
Kommissionen kan p eget initiativ standse en fiskeriak-tivitet (4). 
The Commission has the right to close a fishery on its own initiative (4).
Den skal dog have indsamlet tilstržkkelige beviser for at vžre sikker p, at en kvote er opbrugt, og det begržnser i praksis anvendelsen af denne bestemmelse til de bestande, der kun fanges af et begržnset antal fartżjer, og hvoraf der kun landes begržnsede mžngder. 
In practice, because of the necessity of assembling sufficient evidence to provide assurance that a quota has been used up, the scope of this provision is confined to stocks involving a small number of ships and landings.
Żnsket om at undg enhver risiko af juridisk art medfżrer, at Kommissionen vil have et meget hżjt sikkerhedsniveau, inden den reagerer, hvilket udsžtter datoen for beslutningstagningen endnu mere og dermed nedsžtter foranstaltningens effektivitet. 
In addition, because of the desire to avoid any legal risk, the Commission sets a very high confidence level as a preliminary to action, thereby deferring the date of its decision and hence reducing the effectiveness of the measure.
Retten konkluderer, at overvgningen af kvoter er utilstržkkelig, fordi den er baseret p data af tvivlsom kvalitet, der kun i begržnset omfang kontrolleres af Kommissionen, og der er ikke nogen reel mulighed for at hndhžve reglerne. 
In conclusion, quota monitoring is deficient because the data on which it is based are of doubtful quality, subject only to limited checks by the Commission and without any real possibility of coercive action.
Endvidere garanterer selv grundige administrative kontroller ikke i alle tilfžlde, at oplysningerne i opgżrelserne er korrekte. 
Furthermore, administrative checks, even if they are efficient, do not always guarantee the substance of the information in declarations.
De skal suppleres af fysiske inspektioner. 
They must be supplemented by physical inspections.
(1) 229 i 2005. 
(1) 229 in 2005.
(2) Det er f.eks. undertiden muligt at fżre visse kvoter ind under fangster i en anden zone i en vis periode af et r og i et vist omfang, eller bifangster af visse arter kan for bestemte kvoters vedkommende til dels integreres i de autoriserede mžngder for mlarten. 
(2) For example, it is sometimes possible to charge to certain quotas catches taken in a different zone during a certain period of the year and within a particular limit, or for some species additional catches of certain species are in part incorporated in the authorised quantities of the target species.
(3) En vžsentlig overskridelse: over 5 % af kvoten og/eller 10 % af TAC og/eller over 100 tons. Efter overskridelserne er blevet konstateret, har samtlige 26 overskridelser givet anledning til en nedsžttelse af den tilsvarende kvote for 2006, jf. forordning (EF) nr. 742/2006. 
(3) Significant excess: higher than 5 % of the quota and/or 10 % of the TAC and/or over 100 tonnes; once found each of these 26 excess amounts was deducted from the corresponding 2006 quotas; Regulation (EC) No 742/2006.
(4) Forordning (EŻF) nr. 2847/93, artikel 21, stk. 3, og forordning (EF) nr. 
(4) Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93, Article 21(3) and Regulation (EC) 2371/2002, Article 26(4).
De nationale inspektioners effektivitet er begržnset 52. 
Limited effectiveness of national inspections 52.
En vellykket politik med bžredygtig forvaltning af fiskeressourcerne kržver, at de forskellige bestemmelser reelt fżlges. 
The success of the policy on the sustainable management of fisheries resources depends on effective application of the various regulatory provisions.
Der skal vžre effektive kontrol-og inspektionssystemer, der kan forebygge og opdage overtrždelser. 
That presupposes the existence of effective control and inspection systems capable of preventing and detecting infringements.
Det er nżdvendigt med generelle referencestandarder, et tilstržkkeligt kontrolpres og en optimering af inspektionsaktiviteterne, men Retten kunne ikke verificere, at dette fandtes. 
This requires general reference standards, adequate inspection pressure, and optimisation of inspection activities. None of these three conditions could be substantiated.
Der er ingen generelle standarder Nr der ikke er generelle standarder ... 
Absence of general control standards The absence of general standards ...
I henhold til fžllesskabsbestemmelserne skal medlemsstaterne tržffe de nżdvendige foranstaltninger for effektiv kontrol og inspektion af overholdelsen af de regler, der gžlder for den fžlles fiskeripolitik (5). 
Community legislation places an obligation on Member States to take the necessary measures to implement effective control and inspection of CFP rules (5).
Der er imidlertid ingen retningslinje, der definerer disse begreber. 
However, no guideline as yet defines these concepts.