natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regionalise-ringsplanen skulle i hvert enkelt tilfžlde sikre, at medlemsstatens gennemsnitsudbytte for perioden ikke blev overskredet. 
In every case the regionalisation plan was to ensure that the average yield for the period for the Member State in question was respected.
Kommissionen skulle gennemg medlemsstaternes regionaliseringsplaner og sikre sig, at hver enkelt plan var baseret p relevante, objektive kriterier og var i overensstemmelse med de foreliggende oplysninger om tidligere r (4). 
The Commission was to examine the regionalisation plans presented by the Member States and ensure that each plan was based on appropriate objective criteria and was consistent with available historical data (4).
Kommissionen kunne rejse indvendinger mod planer, der ikke opfyldte kriterierne, isžr med hensyn til medlemsstaternes gennemsnitsudbytter. 
The Commission could object to plans which were not consistent with the aforementioned criteria, especially as regards the average yield in the Member State in question.
Der er tre typer regionaliseringsplaner: Otte medlemsstater (Danmark, Tyskland, Gržkenland, Irland, Luxembourg, Żstrig, Finland og Det Forenede Kongerige) valgte at anvende oliefrżudbyttet. Fire medlemsstater (Spanien, Frankrig, Nederlandene og Portugal) valgte at anvende kornudbyttet. Og tre medlemsstater (Belgien, Italien og Sverige) forelagde regionaliseringsplaner med en kombination af oliefrż-og kornudbytter. 
There are three types of regionalisation plan: eight Member States (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom) elected to use the historical yields for oilseeds; four Member States (France, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain) opted to take the historical yields for cereals as their base; three Member States (Belgium, Italy and Sweden) presented regionalisation plans which contained a mixture of historical yields for oilseeds and for cereals.
Antallet af produk-tionsomrder i de forskellige medlemsstater varierer fra et enkelt til 255. 
The number of production areas in a single Member State varies from one to 255.
Rdet var klar over, at der var risici forbundet med denne store handlefrihed i forbindelse med regionaliseringen, og indfżrte en bestemmelse om, at betalingerne til en medlemsstat kunne nedsžttes (5). 
Aware of the risks intrinsic to the considerable room for manoeuvre created by regionalisation, the Council has limited the payments per Member State (5).
Ulige behandling af landbrugerne i de forskellige medlemsstater 25. 
Unequal treatment of farmers in different Member States 25.
Den mulighed, som Rdets forordning giver medlemsstaterne for at vžlge mellem kornudbyttet og oliefrżudbyttet (jf. punkt 21), har medfżrt ulige behandling af landbrugerne i de forskellige medlemsstater. 
The possibility given by the Council Regulation to Member States of choosing between historical cereal or historical oilseed yields (see paragraph 21) has created unequal treatment of farmers in different Member States.
I Frankrig og Spanien, hvor kornudbyttet blev anvendt, var hektarstżtten henholdsvis 21,8 % og 25,1 % hżjere, end den ville have vžret, hvis den var blevet beregnet p grundlag af oliefrżudbyttet. 
In France and Spain, where historical cereal yields were used, the hectare aid was respectively 21,8 % and 25,1 % higher compared to the hectare aid based on historical oilseed yields.
Retten skżnner, at indvirkningen p EU-budgettet i perioden fra 1992/1993 til 1999/2000 belżber sig til 1 245 millioner euro for Frankrigs vedkommende og 729 millioner euro for Spaniens vedkommende (6). 
The impact on the EU budget for the period 1992/93 to 1999/2000 is estimated by the Court at 1 245 million euro for France and 729 million euro for Spain (6).
(3) Artikel 3, stk. 2, i Rdets forordning (EŻF) nr. 
(3) Article 3(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92.
1765/92. (4) Artikel 3, stk. 4, i Rdets forordning (EŻF) nr. 
(4) Article 3(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92.
(5) Artikel 1, stk. 4, i Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 231/94 af 24. januar 1994 om žndring af forordning (EŻF) nr. 
(5) Article 1(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 231/94 of 24 January 1994 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 (OJ L 30, 3.2.1994, 6 p.
2). () Den skżnnede indvirkning er beregnet ved at sammenholde de faktiske udgifter med de udgifter, som ville vžre blevet afholdt, hvis hektarstżtten i Frankrig og Spanien havde vžret baseret p oliefrżudbyttet. 
2). () The impact is estimated by comparing the actual expenditure with the theoretical expenditure if the hectare aid in France and Spain were based on historical oilseed yields.
22.10.2002 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 254/9 Regionale referencebelżb fżrte til yderligere budgetudgifter 26. 
22.10.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 254/9 Regional reference amounts leading to additional budgetary expenditure 26.
I Rdets forordning (EŻF) nr. 1765/92 (1) er det fastsat, hvordan Kommissionen skal beregne de regionale referencebelżb p grundlag af EF-referencebelżbet: a) Den fremskrevne referencepris erstattes med den konstaterede referencepris. Der tages ikke hensyn til prisudsving inden for 8 % af den fremskrevne referencepris. b) For hver produktionsregion justeres stżtten p grundlag af regionaliseringsplanens oplysninger om kornudbyttet eller oliefrżudbyttet for den pgžldende region. c) Ved beregningen skal der tages hżjde for eventuelle overskridelser af de maksimale garantiarealer i det pgžldende eller i det foregende r. 
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 (1) provides for the Commission to calculate the regional reference amounts on the basis of the Community reference amount as follows: (a) the observed reference price is substituted for the projected reference price; no account shall be taken of price variations within 8 % of the projected reference price; (b) for each production region the aid is adjusted according to the historical yields for oilseeds or cereals indicated in the regionalisation plan; (c) where appropriate, the calculation takes into account any reductions applied as a result of the maximum guaranteed area being exceeded during the current or the previous year.
Det er fastsat i EU-bestemmelserne, at Kommissionen skal beregne den konstaterede referencepris. 
EU regulations stipulate that the Commission shall calculate the observed reference price.
Denne pris skal baseres p priser og bud fra Fžllesskabets repržsentative markeder. 
This price has to be based on prices and offers on representative Community markets.
Syv medlemsstater meddeler regelmžssigt Kommissionen priserne fra deres markeder for rybs-og rapsfrż, solsikkefrż og sojabżnner i lżs afladning. 
Seven Member States periodically report to the Commission the prices on their markets for colza and rape seed, sunflower seed and bulk soya beans.
Eftersom de priser, medlemsstaterne indsamler, i nogle tilfžlde oplyses af virksomheder, som har fordel af stżtteordningen, f.eks. forarbejdningsvirksomheder, er det ikke sikkert, at disse data er plidelige. Rettens revision af beregningen af den konstaterede referencepris og de regionale referencebelżb giver anledning til fżlgende bemžrkninger om forhold, som Kommissionen var opmžrksom p, men ikke tog skridt til at žndre: a) Det endelige regionale referencebelżb skulle fastsžttes af Kommissionen inden den 30. januar i hvert produktionsr. 
As prices collected by the Member States are in some cases provided by interested parties such as crushing companies, the reliability of such data is questionable. The CourtŐs audit of the calculation of the observed reference prices and the regional reference amounts leads to the following observations, of which the Commission was aware, though it did not take any steps to change things. (a) The final regional reference amount was to be determined by the Commission before 30 January in each marketing year.
Alts blev priserne fra februar til juni ikke taget i betragtning ved beregningen af den konstaterede referencepris og vžgtnings-koefficienterne, selv om der indgs kontrakter om forarbejdning af 30 til 40 % af hżsten i den periode. 
Consequently, the calculation of the observed reference price and the weighting coefficients did not take into account the prices of February to June although 30 % to 40 % of the harvest is contracted in that period.
Priserne i disse mneder blev ikke engang taget i betragtning ved beregningen af den konstaterede referencepris for det fżlgende produktionsr (2). 
The prices of these months were not even taken into account for the calculation of the observed reference price of the following marketing year (2).
I produktionsrene fra 1993/1994 til 1998/1999 var den gennemsnitlige markedspris i Frankrig for eksempel 1,91 % hżjere i disse mneder end i rets żvrige mneder p grund af lageromkostninger. 
For France for example, the average market price for the marketing years 1993/94 until 1998/99 in those months was 1,91 % higher than in the other months due to storage costs.
1, i Rdets forordning (EŻF) nr. 1765/92. () I en dom afsagt den 7. marts 2002 (C-328/00) bekržfter Domstolen, at Kommissionen har ret til at anvende beregningsmetoden p en referenceperiode p syv mneder. 
The Court estimates the resulting additional costs to the EU bud-1 (2) Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92. () A ruling by the Court of Justice of 7 March 2002 (C-328/00) confirms the CommissionŐs discretionary powers in applying the calculation method to a reference period of seven months.
Domstolen udtaler sig i denne dom kun om lovligheden af Kommissionens beslutning. Den tager ikke stilling til aspektet forsvarlig żkonomisk forvaltning. ekstraomkostninger for EU belżb sig til i alt 130 millioner euro i produktionsrene fra 1993/1994 til 1999/2000 (3). b) Nr Kommissionen foretog sin beregning med henblik p den rlige justering af stżtten, rundede den forskellen mellem den konstaterede referencepris og den fremskrevne referencepris af til det laveste procentpoint, selv om det ikke var fastsat i forordningen (1). 
This ruling concerns only the legality of the CommissionŐs decision; it does not cover the sound financial management aspect. get at a total of 130 million euro for the marketing years 1993/94 to 1999/2000 (3). (b) In its annual aid adjustment calculation, the Commission rounded the difference between the observed reference price and the projected reference price to the lower percentage point, although this was not provided for by the regulation (1).
Afrundingen medfżrte en stigning i Fžllesskabets udgifter p 95 millioner euro fra 1992/1993 til 1999/ 2000 (4). c) Ved sin rlige beregning af stżtten anvendte Kommissionen desuden systematisk en anden formel end den formel, der er angivet i Rdets forordning fra 1992 om indfżrelsen af den nye ordning. 
This rounding increased Community expenditure by 95 million euro between 1992/93 and 1999/2000 (4). (c) Additionally, in its annual aid calculation, the Commission systematically used a formula that was different from the formula in the Council regulation adopting the new regime in 1992.
Anvendelsen af denne anden formel fżrte til en forhżjelse af stżtten. 
The use of a different formula increased the aid.
Udgifterne til stżtteordningen fra 1992/ 1993 til 1999/2000 żgedes med 90 millioner euro, som blev betalt over EU-budgettet (5). d) Kommissionen kunne ikke fremlžgge bevis p, at medlemsstaterne eller Kommissionen selv i forbindelse med tjenesterejser til medlemsstaterne p noget tidspunkt kontrollerede, om de meddelte priser var faktiske priser for levering til et efterspżrgselscenter ssom en forarbejdningsvirksomhed. 
The additional cost to the EU budget between 1992/93 and 1999/ 2000 amounts to 90 million euro (5). (d) The Commission could not produce evidence to show that, during missions to Member States, either itself or the Member States, at any time, checked price quotations to verify if they represented real prices for delivery to a centre of demand, e.g. a crusher.
For eksempel var de priser, som Italien meddelte Kommissionen, priser noteret p de fire store varebżrser. 
In Italy for instance, the prices sent to the Commission were prices quoted on the four major commodity exchanges.
De priser, der noteres p de italienske varebżrser, er priser betalt til landbrugere. 
The prices quoted on the Italian commodity exchanges are prices paid to farmers.
De indbefatter ikke de yderligere omkostninger ved transport og indsamling, som bžres af forarbejdningsindustrien. 
They do not include additional costs for transport and collection borne by the crushing industry.
Efter en tjenesterejse til Italien besluttede Kommissionen at foretage en korrektion for transportomkostningerne. 
Following a mission to Italy the Commission decided to make a correction for the transport costs.
Der blev ikke foretaget nogen korrektion for indsamlingsomkostningerne, som svinger mellem 10 og 13 euro pr. ton. 
No correction was made for the collection costs, which vary between 10 euro and 13 euro per tonne.
Det forklarer de konstaterede forskelle mellem de italienske priser og priserne fra de andre medlemsstater. 
This amount explains the differences observed between prices communicated by Italy and the other Member States.
Kommissionen vžgtede de italienske priser med 19 % ved fastsžttelsen af den konstaterede referencepris. 
The Italian prices have a weighting of 19 % for determining the observed reference price as calculated by the Commission.
Det betyder, at den konstaterede referencepris blev fastsat for lavt. 
Consequently, the observed reference price as calculated by the Commission was too low.
Retten skżnner, at ekstraudgifterne p EU-budgettet i 1997/1998 og 1998/1999 belżber sig til 51,8 millioner euro (6). 
The additional charge to the EU budget for 1997/98 and 1998/99 can be estimated at 51,8 million euro (6).
(3) Overkompenseringen er beregnet ved at sammenholde de faktiske udgifter med de udgifter, som ville vžre blevet afholdt, hvis den konstaterede referencepris havde vžret beregnet p grundlag af 12 mneder, dvs. fra juli til juni. 
(3) The overcompensation is estimated by comparing the actual expenditure with the theoretical expenditure if the observed reference price was calculated on the basis of 12 months, i.e. from July to June.
I ordningens fżrste r (1992/1993) forel der 4 ikke data for 12 mneder. () Stigningen i udgifterne er beregnet ved at sammenholde de faktiske udgifter med de udgifter, der ville vžre blevet afholdt, hvis den procentuelle forskel mellem den konstaterede og den fremskrevne refe-5 rencepris ikke var blevet afrundet. () De żgede udgifter er beregnet ved at sammenholde de faktiske udgifter med de udgifter, der ville vžre blevet afholdt, hvis den konstaterede referencepris var blevet anvendt ved den oprindelige beregning af EF-referencebelżbet i stedet for den fremskrevne referencepris. 
For the first year of application (1992/93), data for a 12-month period 4 were not available. () The increase of expenditure is calculated by comparing the actual expenditure with the theoretical expenditure if the difference expressed as a percentage between the observed and the projected reference 5 price was not rounded. () The additional cost is calculated by comparing the actual expenditure with the theoretical expenditure if the observed reference price was substituted in the initial calculation of the Community reference amount.
Kommissionen korrigerede hektarstżtten med den procentuelle for-6 skel mellem den konstaterede og den historiske referencepris. () Ekstraudgifterne er beregnet ved at sammenholde de faktiske udgifter med de udgifter, der ville vžre blevet afholdt, hvis indsamlingsom-kostningerne havde vžret indregnet i de markedspriser, som Italien indberettede. 
The calculation made by the Commission corrected the hectare aid for the difference expressed as a percentage between the 6 observed and the historical reference price. () The additional charge is estimated by comparing the actual expenditure with the theoretical expenditure if the collection costs were added to the market prices communicated by Italy.
C 254/10 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 22.10.2002 28. 
C 254/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22.10.2002 28.
Fordi grundlaget for de yderligere udgifter, som er omtalt i punkt 27, var Kommissionens egne beslutninger, er det under hensyntagen til retsprincipperne om beskyttelse af den berettigede forventning og retssikkerheden ikke lžngere muligt at tilbagesżge midlerne fra medlemsstaterne eller stżttemodtagerne. 
As the additional expenditure mentioned in paragraph 27 is the result of decisions by the Commission, recovering funds from the Member States or from beneficiaries is no longer possible, given the legal principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty.
Regionaliseringsplaner med for hżje udbytter 29. 
Regionalisation plans containing overstated historical yields 29.
I rsberetningen for regnskabsret 1996 (1) redegjorde Retten for en undersżgelse af de udbytter, som var angivet i forskellige regionaliseringsplaner. 
Initsannualreportconcerningthefinancialyear1996(1), the Court examined the yields mentioned in some of the regionalisation plans.
Retten konstaterede dengang, at der i nogle planer var angivet gennemsnitlige udbytter, som var hżjere, end fžllesskabsforordningen tillod, blandt andet i den tyske regionaliseringsplan for oliefrż (2) og i de franske og spanske regionaliseringsplaner for korn (3). 
It had observed overstated average yields in the German regionalisation plan for oilseeds (2) and in the French and Spanish regionalisation plans for cereals (3). The Commission did not require the Member States concerned to correct their regionalisation plans.
De gennemsnitlige udbytter er angivet for hżjt i to andre regionaliseringsplaner: a) Med hensyn til udarbejdelsen af den portugisiske regionaliseringsplan henvises der i Rdets forordning (EŻF) nr. 1765/92 til data meddelt af Portugal i henhold til forordning (EŻF) nr. 3653/90 (4). 
Historical average yields were overstated in two other regionalisation plans: (a) for the establishment of the Portuguese regionalisation plan, Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 refers to the data provided by Portugal under Regulation (EEC) No 3653/90 (4).
En analyse af disse data giver et vžgtet gennemsnitligt udbytte p 2,5 ton pr. hektar. 
Analysis of these data gives a weighted average yield of 2,5 t/ha.
Kommissionen gav Portugal tilladelse til at anvende et vžgtet gennemsnitligt udbytte p 2,9 ton pr. hektar, hvilket svarer til en forhżjelse p 16 % i forhold til det udbytte, som er defineret i forordningen. b) I den italienske regionaliseringsplan er der ogs angivet for hżje udbytter. 
The Commission authorised Portugal to use a weighted average yield of 2,9 t/ha, which is equivalent to an increase of 16%overtheyielddefinedbytheregulations; (b) the Italian regionalisation plan also contains overstated yields.
I referenceperioden 1986-1990 kom ca. 20 % af de italiensk producerede oliefrż fra arealer, der blev hżstet to gange om ret: fżrst korn og derefter sojabżnner. 
Over the reference period 1986 to 1990 approximately 20 % of the oilseed produced in Italy was, in fact, from areas of land that produced two crops per year, first cereals and then soya beans.
Ved beregningen af det gennemsnitlige oliefrżudbytte medregnede de italienske myndigheder den samlede produktion af oliefrż, ogs oliefrż fra de arealer, der blev hżstet to gange om ret. 
For the purpose of calculating historical average oilseed yields, the Italian authorities took account of total oilseed production, including production from areas yielding two crops a year.
Men myndighederne sammenholdt denne samlede produktion med et samlet areal, som ikke omfattede de arealer, der blev hżstet to gange om ret. 
However, total oilseed production was then expressed as a ratio of the total area less the area that produced two crops per year.
De italienske myndigheder meddelte p dette grundlag Kommissionen et vžgtet gennemsnitligt oliefrżudbytte p 3,74 ton pr. hektar. 
On that basis, the Italian authorities reported to the Commission a weighted average yield of 3,74 tonnes per hectare for oilseed.
Men i virkeligheden var det gennemsnitlige oliefrżudbytte i perioden 1986-1990 kun 3,07 ton pr. hektar (5). 
However, the real average yieldforoilseedsintheperiod1986to1990wasonly3,07t/ ha (5).
Da Kommissionen blev bekendt med denne beregningsmetode, meddelte den de italienske myndigheder, at den ikke ville gżre indvendinger imod metoden og heller ikke imod resultaterne. 
When informed of this method of calculation, the Commission told the Italian authorities that it would challenge neither the method itself nor the results produced by it.
1 (2) EFT C 348 af 18.11.1997, s. 
1 (2) OJ C 348,18.11.1997, p.
(3) Punkt 3.23 i rsberetningen for regnskabsret 1996. (4) Punkt 3.22 i rsberetningen for regnskabsret 1996. () Rdets forordning (EŻF) nr. 3653/90 af 11. december 1990 om overgangsbestemmelser for den fžlles markedsordning for korn og ris i 5 Portugal (EFT L 362 af 27.12.1990, s. 
70. () Paragraph 3.23 of the annual report concerning the financial year 3 1996. () Paragraph 3.22 of the annual report concerning the financial year 4 1996. () Council Regulation (EEC) No 3650/90 of 11 December 1990 on measures to strengthen the application of the common quality standards 5 for fruit and vegetables in Portugal (OJ L 362, 27.12.1990, p.
22). () Kilde: Eurostat Ń ČNew CronosÇ. 
22). () Source: Eurostat Ń ÔNew CronosŐ statistics.
Retten anslr, at den samlede finansielle effekt af de forhold, som er omtalt i punkt 29 og 30, kan opgżres til 729,3 millioner euro, der blev džkket over fžllesskabsbudgettet i perioden 1993-1999, heraf 474,7 millioner euro til oliefrż og 254,6 millioner euro til korn (6). 
The Court estimates that the total financial impact of the observations set out in paragraphs 29 and 30 was a charge to the Community budget of 729,3 million euro of expenditure over the period 1993 to 1999, i.e. 474,7 million euro for oilseeds and 254,6 million euro for cereals (6).
Fordi disse udgifter blev afholdt p grundlag af regionaliseringsplaner, som Kommissionen havde godkendt, er det under hensyntagen til de retsprincipper, som er omtalt i punkt 28, ikke lžngere muligt at tilbagesżge midlerne fra medlemsstaterne eller stżttemodtagerne. 
As this expenditure is the result of regionalisation plans accepted by the Commission, it can no longer be recovered from the Member States or from beneficiaries in view of the legal principles cited in paragraph 28.
Til sammenligning var de faktiske kornudbytter 2,513 og 3,78 ton pr. hektar. Rdet forhżjede sledes ex decreto de faktiske gennemsnitsudbytter med henholdsvis 15,4 % og 3,2 %. b) For Portugals vedkommende (8) gav Kommissionen igen denne medlemsstat tilladelse til at anvende et gennemsnitligt udbytte p 2,9 ton pr. hektar i stedet for 2,5 ton pr. hektar (jf. punkt 30, litra a)). 
The CouncilŐs decision thereby had the effect of increasing the real historical average yields by 15,4 % and 3,2 %; (b) in PortugalŐs case (8), the Commission re-authorised the average yield of 2,9 tonnes/hectare, instead of 2,5 tonnes/hectare (see paragraph 30(a)).
9Det skal desuden ppeges, at Rettens tidligere bemžrkninger ( ) om den tyske regionaliseringsplan for korn ogs er relevante for oliefrż fra produktionsret 2002/2003, og at bemžrkningerne vedrżrende den franske regionaliseringsplan stadig er aktuelle med hensyn til samtlige markafgrżder (jf. punkt 29). 
Furthermore, the CourtŐs previous observations (9) about the regionalisation plan for cereals in Germany will also be applicable to oilseeds from the 2002/03 year onwards, and those concerning FranceŐs regionalisation plan continue to apply for all arable crops (see paragraph 29).
Disse forhold fżrer til betalinger, som er hżjere, end fžllesskabsreglerne tillader. 
The resulting increased payments are greater than those specified in the Community regulations.
PRODUKTION AF INDUSTRIAFGRŻDER P BRAKLAGT JORD Udtagning af agerjord 34. 
PRODUCTION OF INDUSTRIAL CROPS ON SET-ASIDE LAND The obligation to set aside arable land 34.