natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dette ml blev bekržftet p verdenstopmżdet om fżdevarer i Rom den 10.2 13. juli 2002. () Alle tal hidrżrer fra FAOŐs ČAssessment of the World Food Security SituationÇ, der blev offentliggjort af Komiten for Verdensfżdevaresik-kerhed efter dennes mżde i Rom fra den 28.5.2001 til den 1.6.2001. 
It was confirmed by the World Food Summit in Rome on 10 2 to 13 July 2002. () All figures are taken from the FAOŐs ÔAssessment of the world food security situationŐ published by the Committee on World Food Security after its Rome session of 28 May 2001 to 1 June 2001.
17.4.2003 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 93/5 udarbejdet p topmżdet, er der tale om fżdevaresikkerhed, nr alle mennesker til enhver tid har fysisk og żkonomisk adgang til nžringsrigtige og sikre fżdevarer i tilstržkkelige mžngder til at sikre dem et aktivt og sundt liv (1). 
17.4.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 93/5 exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, nutritionally adequate and safe food to meet their needs for an active and healthy life (1).
Dette betyder, at der samtidig med en stigning i den indenlandske fżdevareproduktion (kombineret med fżdevareimport) skal ske en stigning i husstandenes indkomster, s de fr rd til at kżbe fżdevarer. 
In this context, increased domestic food production (in combination with food imports) must go hand in hand with an increase in household incomes needed to purchase food.
I mellemtiden har Fžllesskabet ogs žndret sin politik betydeligt, idet fokus er flyttet fra kortsigtet fżdevarehjžlp i naturalier til langsigtede aktioner til stżtte for fżdevaresikkerheden med henblik p bžredygtig udvikling, żkonomisk vžkst og fattigdomsbekžmpelse. 
The CommunityŐs policy has also changed considerably in the meantime: the focus has shifted from short-term food aid in kind to seeking long-term food security supporting sustainable development, economic growth and poverty reduction.
Dette holdningsskift er afspejlet i Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 1292/96 om fżdevaresikkerhed, hvori det understregedes, at fżdevarehjžlp kun delvis og kun p kort sigt kan afhjžlpe fżdevareusikkerheden, og at den generelle fattigdomsbekžmpelse bżr omfatte en langsigtet politik til fremme af fżdevaresikkerheden. 
This shift in global thinking was reflected in the Council Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 on food security which stressed that food aid can only provide a partial and short-term solution to food insecurity and that long-term policies on food security should be a part of the overall fight against poverty.
I praksis har dette betydet et skift fra stżtte i naturalier til żkonomisk og teknisk bistand. 
In practical terms this has meant a move from aid in kind to financial and technical aid.
1292/96 erstatter fem tidligere sžrskilte forordninger (2). 
Council Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 replaces five former separate Regulations (2).
Hovedformlene med forordningen, som integrerer fżdevarehjžlp i en bredere strategi for fżdevaresikkerhed, kan sammenfattes sledes: a) at fremme fżdevaresikkerheden med sžrligt sigte p at lindre fattigdommen i modtagerlandene b) at mindske modtagerlandenes afhžngighed af fżdevarehjžlp c) at bidrage til en harmonisk żkonomisk og social udvikling i modtagerlandene. 
It integrates food aid into a broader food security strategy. The main objectives of the Regulation can be summarised as follows: (a) enhancing food security geared to alleviating poverty in the recipient countries; (b) reducing the recipient countriesŐ dependence on food aid; (c) contributing to the countriesŐ balanced economic and social development.
For at mlrette sin indsats mod de mest udsatte lande har Kommissionen fżr gennemfżrelsen udvalgt 21 hżjtprioriterede lande(3), der skal modtage strukturstżtte, og yderligere 11 lande (4) samt Det Palžstinensiske Omrde, der anses for at befinde sig i en krise-eller Čpost-kriseÇ-situation. 
To focus its interventions on the most vulnerable countries, prior to implementation, the Commission has selected 21 priority countries (3) for structural interventions and a further 11 countries (4) and the territory of Palestine which are regarded as beinginacrisisorpost-crisissituation.
I september 2001 vedtog Kommissionen en meddelelse, der var baseret p en ekstern evaluering af gennemfżrelsen af Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 1292/96. 
Following an external evaluation of the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 the Commission in September 2001 adopted a communication to be submitted to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Denne meddelelse (KOM(2001) 473), som skulle forelžgges for Europa-Parlamentet og Rdet, og de relevante rdskonklusioner 15390/01 var yderligere tiltag til fuldt ud at integrere mlene og instrumenterne for fżdevarehjžlp og fżdevaresikkerhed i Kommissionens udviklingspolitik og -samarbejde. 
This communication (COM(2001) 473) and the relevant Council conclusions (15390/ 01) were further steps to fully integrate food aid and food security objectives and instruments into the CommissionŐs development policy and cooperation. THE COURTŐS AUDIT Previous audits 10.
Retten har allerede vedtaget fire sžrberetninger (5) om fżdevarehjžlp, hvoraf de sidste to blev offentliggjort i 1988. 
The Court has already adopted four special reports (5) on food aid, the last two of which were published in 1988.
Retten har ogs behandlet fżdevarehjžlpen i sine rsberetninger (6). 
The Court has also devoted parts of its Annual Reports to food aid (6).
Denne beretning er den fżrste, der vedrżrer fżdevaresikkerhed. 
This report is the first concerned with food security aspects.
Revisionsml 11. 
The audit objectives 11.
Det overordnede ml for Rettens revision var at undersżge, om Kommissionen har gjort, hvad der med rimelighed kan forventes for at opn de fżdevaresikkerhedsml, der er opstillet i forordning (EF) nr. 1292/96. 
The overall objective of the CourtŐs audit was to determine whether the Commission has taken all reasonable steps to achieve the food security objectives set out in Regulation (EC) No 1292/96.
C 93/6 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 17.4.2003 b) Hvordan identificeres, gennemfżres, overvges og evalueres aktioner? Hvordan sikres disse aktioners sammenhžng med andre programmer, projekter eller aktioner vedrżrende udvik-lingsbistand? c) Er informationerne p centralt og lokalt forvaltningsniveau fyldestgżrende? (Er de fuldstžndige, relevante og plidelige, og foreligger de rettidigt?) d) Hvordan sikres sammenhžngen, komplementariteten og samordningen mellem EU og andre donorer, isžr EU-medlemsstaterne? 
C 93/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.4.2003 (b) the identification, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of actions and the consistency with other development aid programmes, projects or actions; (c) the adequacy of information (completeness, relevancy, reliability and timeliness) at the level of central and local management; (d) consistency, complementarity and coordination between the EU and other donors, in particular EU Member States.
Revisionsmetode 12. 
Audit approach 12.
Revisionen omfattede primžrt en undersżgelse af, hvordan fžllesskabspolitikken vedrżrende fżdevaresikkerhed i henhold til forordning (EF) nr. 1292/96, der finansieres over EUŐs almindelige budget, kapitelB7-20, var blevet gennemfżrt i perioden 1997-2001. 
The audit focused primarily on the implementation during the period 1997 to 2001 of the CommunityŐs food security policy under Regulation (EC) No 1292/96, as financed by Chapter B7-2 0 of the general budget of the European Union.
Retten undersżgte sammenhžngen og komplementariteten med aktioner, der har andre finansieringskilder (eksterne aktioner finansieret over andre EU-budgetkonti og De Europžiske Udviklingsfonde (EUFŐer)). 
The consistency and complementarity with actions financed from other sources (external actions financed by other EU budget headings and the European Development Funds (EDFs)) was examined.
Revisionen begyndte med en undersżgelse af Kommissionens forvaltning p centralt og lokalt plan, herunder en undersżgelse af, hvorledes Kommissionen hndterer strategiske spżrgsml om fżdevaresikkerhed, og hvorledes den tilrettelžgger gennemfżrelsen af denne politik. 
The starting point for the audit was the CommissionŐs management at central and local level involving the examination of how the Commission dealt with issues of food security strategy and how it organised itself to implement its policy.
En ržkke modtagerlande (1) blev besżgt med henblik p at fastsl, hvorledes projekterne var blevet identificeret, vurderet, gennemfżrt og overvget. 
A number of beneficiary countries (1) were visited to establish how projects had been identified, assessed, implemented and monitored.
Retten udvalgte en ržkke projekter for at undersżge, om de var sammenhžngende og koordinerede, og hvad der var gjort for at sikre en bžredygtig forbedring af fżdevaresikkerheden. 
For this purpose, a number of projects were selected to assess the extent to which they were consistent and coordinated and which steps have been taken to ensure that food security could be improved in a sustainable way.
Retten undersżgte isžr, i hvor hżj grad de centrale og lokale myndigheder og lokalsamfundene var blevet inddraget i hele processen. 
In particular, the Court examined the extent to which the central and local authorities and the local communities had been involved in the whole process.
Bilag 1 viser underernžringssituationen i disse lande. 
Annex 1 shows the situation of undernourishment in these countries.
Retten undersżgte ogs, hvordan EU og andre donorer, isžr medlemsstaterne, koordinerer deres indsats bde p centralt og p lokalt plan. 
The extent of coordination between the EU and other donors, in particular Member States, was examined at both central and local level.
Ogs FAO, Rdets Komit for Fżdevaresikkerhed og Fżdevarehjžlp (FSFAC) samt den organisation, der er ansvarlig for det europžiske net for fżdevaresikkerhed (RESAL), blev besżgt. 
Furthermore, visits were made to the FAO, the Food Security and Food Aid Committee of the Council (FSFAC) and the organisation responsible for the European network on food security (RESAL).
(1) Bolivia, Etiopien, Georgien, Madagaskar, Niger og Yemen, der blev udvalgt p grundlag af stżrrelsen af den modtagne EU-stżtte til fremme af fżdevaresikkerheden; undersżgelsen džkkede mindst t land pr. geografisk omrde. 
(1) Bolivia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Madagascar, Niger and Yemen, selected on the basis of the importance of the amounts of support for food security given by the EU budget, including at least one of each of the geographical areas.
BEMŽRKNINGER Retsgrundlaget og begrebet fżdevaresikkerhed 17. 
OBSERVATIONS The legal framework and the concept of food security 17.
Som noget nyt indpassede forordning (EF) nr. 1292/96 fżdevarehjžlp i en udviklingspolitik med en flerrig strategi til fremme af fżdevaresikkerheden og fattigdomslindringen, der skal bidrage til en harmonisk żkonomisk og social udvikling i modtagerlandene. 
The innovative aspect of Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 was that it integrated food aid into a development policy with a multiannual approach to food security and poverty alleviation, contributing to a balanced economic and social development of the recipient countries.
En vigtig nyskabelse i denne forordning er indfżrelsen af en efterspżrgselsbaseret politik, der kan forbedre de udsatte befolkningsgruppers kżbekraft, som et supplement til den eksisterende udbudsbaserede politik, hvis forml er at forżge den lokale fżdevareproduktion (eller -import). 
One of the key elements of this regulation was to add a new demand-based approach of increasing the purchasing power of the vulnerable groups of the population to the existing supply-based approach of increasing local food production (or imports).
Fżdevaresikkerhed er et bredt begreb. Fżdevareusikker-hed (mangel p fżdevarer eller manglende adgang hertil) opstr af mange grunde, hvoraf de fleste er strukturbetingede. 
The concept of food security is broad. Food insecurity, whether in the sense of non-availability of food or inaccessibility of food, is caused by a great number of factors, most of them being structural.
Kortsigtede aktioner omfatter normalt fżdevarehjžlp, og derfor fokuseres der i forbindelse med fżdevaresikkerhed normalt p de rsager, der p lžngere sigt fżrer til fżdevareusikkerhed. 
Short-term actions are usually in the form of food aid and the focus of food security is thus normally on structural long-term causes.
Der kan f.eks. vžre tale om ugunstige klimaforhold, utilstržkkelig infrastruktur, utilstržkkelige uddannelses-og sundhedsfaciliteter, drlige udsigter til generel żkonomisk vžkst, drlig administration og svag regeringsfż-relse. 
These can be, for example, unfavourable climatic conditions, inadequate infrastructure, inadequate educational and health facilities, weak prospects of overall economic growth, inadequate administration and weak governance.
Fżdevareusikkerhed, fattigdom og manglende udvikling hžnger sammen, og situationen kan kun forbedres gennem en bred vifte af udviklingstiltag. 
The factors underlying food insecurity are all causes of poverty and lack of development.
Rettens gennemgang af en ržkke landes fżdevaresikkerhedsprojekter i henhold til forordning (EF) nr. 
Such a variety was found in the CourtŐs examination of food security projects of a number of countries financed from Chapter B7-2 0 in the 1997 to 2001 general budgets under Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 (see Annex 2).
1292/96 er indfżrt en politik vedrżrende fżdevaresikkerhed og fżdevarehjžlp, finder den ikke anvendelse p de udviklingsaktioner, der finansieres dels over det almindelige budgets kapitler for Asien, Latinamerika og middelhavslandene, dels af EUFŐerne for AVS-landene (Afrika, Vestindien og Stillehavet). 
On the other hand, although Council Regulation (EC) No 1292/96 laid down a policy on food security and food aid it does not govern development actions financed by the general budget chapters for Asia, Latin America and the Mediterranean countries and by the EDFs for the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States.
Den nuvžrende situation resulterer i, at udviklingsprogrammer ikke integreres sžrligt godt i de mainstreamprogrammer, der finansieres dels over det almindelige budgets kapitler for Asien, Latinamerika og middelhavslandene, dels af EUFŐerne, og som har samme ml: lindring af fattigdom, forbedring af levevilkr og fremme af fżdevaresikkerhed. 
The current situation leads to development programmes not well integrated with the mainstream programmes financed by the general budget chapters for Asia, Latin America and the Mediterranean countries and by the EDFs with the same objectives of poverty alleviation, improving living conditions and food security.
17.4.2003 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 93/7 21. 
17.4.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 93/7 21.
Ifżlge forordningen skal fžllesskabsbistanden integreres i modtagerlandenes udviklingspolitik og fżdevarestrategier og stżtte modtagerlandenes egen politik for fattigdomsbekžmpelse (1). 
The Regulation states that EC intervention must be integrated into the development policies and food strategies of the recipient countries and must back up those countriesŐ own policies on poverty reduction (1).
Men den tilstržbte integrering af fżdevaresikkerhedsaspektet i udviklingslandenes udviklingspolitik og fżdevarestrategier var kun opnet i to af de besżgte lande (Madagaskar og Bolivia), mens programmerne vedrżrende fżdevaresikkerhed i de żvrige lande blev gennemfżrt som sžrskilte udviklingsprogrammer (jf. ogs punkt 25). 
However, the aim of integrating food security into the development policies and food strategies of the developing countries was only achieved in two of the countries visited (Madagascar, Bolivia) whereas in the others the food security programmes were implemented as separate development programmes (see also paragraph 25).
Modtagerlandenes strategier 22. 
Recipient countriesŐ strategies 22.
Ideelt set skal denne politik for hvert enkelt modtagerland vžre nedfžldet i t overordnet udviklingsstrategisk dokument, som džkker alle relevante aspekter som f.eks. lindring af fattigdom, fżdevaresikkerhed, udvikling af landdistrikter og udvikling af de sociale sektorer. 
Ideally, this policy should be embedded for each recipient country in a single overall development strategy paper, in which all relevant aspects, like poverty alleviation, food security, rural development, development of the social sectors, should be covered.
I overensstemmelse hermed bżr fżdevaresikker-hedsaspekterne indarbejdes i de strategidokumenter vedrżrende fattigdomsbekžmpelse, der udarbejdes af udviklingslandene under Verdensbankens og Den Internationale Valutafonds (IMFŐs) vejledning. 
In the same spirit the aspects of food security should be incorporated in the poverty reduction strategy papers established by the developing countries under the guidance of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
I Madagaskar supplerer handlingsplanen for udvikling af landdistrikter og det forelżbige dokument vedrżrende strategien for fattigdomsbekžmpelse hinanden p en god mde. 
In Madagascar, the action plan for rural development and the interim document on the poverty reduction strategy are complementary and well integrated.
Dokumenterne lžgger op til, at lokalsamfundene skal inddrages i indsatsen, og de udgżr et godt bidrag til bekžmpelsen af fattigdommen. 
They are characterised by a participatory approach and are well integrated into the fight against poverty.
Desuden er der overensstemmelse mellem dokumenterne og regeringens overordnede strategier og ogs med mlene for forordning (EF) nr. 1292/96. 
In addition, they are consistent with both the general policy strategies of the Government and with the aims and objectives of Regulation (EC) No 1292/96.
Der er ogs god overensstemmelse mellem p den ene side Bolivias nationale program vedrżrende fżdevaresikkerhed og p den anden side landets overordnede program for żkonomisk og social udvikling og programmet for landbrugsudvikling samt strategien for fattigdomsbekžmpelse (med hensyn til ml og prioriterede indsatsomrder). 
BoliviaŐs national programme for food security is also well integrated with its general economic and social development programme, closely linked with the agricultural development programme and consistent with the poverty reduction strategy in terms of objectives and priority interventions domains.
I Etiopien, Georgien, Niger og Yemen var fżdevaresikkerhedspolitikken derimod ikke integreret i landenes overordnede udviklingsstrategier. 
In Ethiopia, Georgia, Niger and Yemen, however, the food security policies were not integrated into beneficiary countriesŐ overall development strategies.
I stedet var der i disse lande udarbejdet f.eks. n strategi for landbruget, n strategi for udvikling af landdistrikter og n strategi vedrżrende fżdevaresikkerhed, hvilket skabte (1) Artikel 1, stk. 4, samt betragtning 2 og 23 i pržamblen. 
Instead, a number of stand-alone strategies existed on, for example, agriculture, rural development and food security, which caused confusion at the level of the recipient countries as to the differences or similarities between the (1) Article 1(4) and preamble, recitals 2 and 23.
(2) Betragtning 2 i pržamblen, artikel 1, stk. 4, og artikel 2, stk. 
(2) Recital 2 of the preamble, Article 1(4) and Article 2(2), last indent. various strategies.
Ingen af strategidokumenterne behandlede jord-besiddelsessystemer, jordreformer eller miljż, der ellers er vigtige aspekter i forbindelse med fżdevaresikkerhed. 
Despite its importance in the context for food security, none of the strategy documents dealt with land tenure systems and land reform or environmental aspects.
I strid med rdfor-ordningens artikel 5 synes dokumenterne heller ikke at tage hensyn til kżnsdimensionen. 
Equally, no evidence was found that gender issues were taken into account, contrary to Article 5 of the Council Regulation.
I Etiopiens strategidokument om fżdevaresikkerhed fra 1996 tillžgges de vžsentligste strategispżrgsml og den manglende kżbekraft ganske vist en vis betydning, men hovedvžgten er lagt p vžksten i landbrugsproduktionen, og det viser, at fżdevareusikkerheden i Etiopien isžr er et forsyningsproblem. 
In Ethiopia, the 1996 food security strategy document, although giving a certain attention to key policy issues and to the lack of purchasing power, puts much emphasis on agricultural growth, implying that food insecurity in this country is mainly a supply problem.
Den etiopiske regering fżlger da ogs fortsat det traditionelle nżd-hjžlpsorienterede mżnster med massiv fżdevarehjžlp i naturalier (som toppede med 1,4 millioner tons i 2000). 
In fact, the Ethiopian Government continued with its traditional relief-oriented pattern of massive food aid in kind (reaching a peak of 1,4 million tonnes in 2000).
Bortset fra, at fżdevarehjžlp ikke lżser problemet med strukturbetinget fżdevare-usikkerhed, har sdanne naturalydelser en negativ effekt p priserne p det lokale fżdevaremarked og dermed p den lokale produktion og indkomstudvikling. 
Apart from not being an answer to structural food insecurity, it has negative effects on prices on the local food market, and thereby on local production and income.
Det forelżbige strategidokument for fattigdomsbekžmpelse i Etiopien lžgger ikke tilstržkkelig vžgt p strukturspżrgsmlene, som er den dybereliggende rsag til fżdevareusikkerheden, men anfżrer i stedet konsekvent fżdevarehjžlp som lżsning p problemerne. 
The interim poverty reduction strategy paper for Ethiopia does not sufficiently deal with the structural issues which are at the root of food insecurity and keeps insisting on the need for continued food aid.
Georgiens og Yemens dokumenter om fżdevaresikkerhed indeholder ikke nogen prioritering. 
In Georgia and Yemen, the national food security documents do not formulate priorities.
Selv om det i Yemens strategidokument med rette ppeges, at landet ikke kan blive selvforsynende med fżdevarer, indeholder dokumentet ikke forslag til, hvorledes kżbekraften og den fysiske adgang til fżdevarer kan forbedres. 
Whereas YemenŐs strategy paper rightly points out that it cannot become self-sufficient in food production, the strategy does not indicate ways to improve purchasing power and physical accessibility to food.
I Niger er strategidokumentet vedrżrende fżdevaresikkerhed en god handlingsplan, men ikke et strategidokument, eftersom det ikke indeholder overordnede ml. 
In Niger, the food security strategy paper is a good action plan rather than a strategy document because it does not set out broad objectives.
Regeringen godkendte dette dokument i august 2000, men da Retten aflagde revisionsbesżg i Niger i juni 2001, var det endnu ikke gennemfżrt i praksis. 
Although the Government approved this paper in August 2000, it was still awaiting its practical implementation at the moment of the CourtŐs visit to this country in June 2001.
Basisoplysninger 29. 
Baseline information 29.
Det var og er fortsat vanskeligt at formulere ml for fżdevaresikkerheden, fordi der ikke foreligger plidelige oplysninger om situationen med hensyn til fżdevaresikkerhed i modtagerlandene, isžr ikke p husstandsniveau. 
The formulation of targets concerning food security was, and remains, constrained by the lack of reliable information on the food security situation in the recipient countries, in particular at household level.
Det er derfor stort set umuligt at afgržnse de fattigste befolkningssegmenter og bestemme, hvilke foranstaltninger der er de mest egnede. 
As a result, it is virtually impossible to determine the poorest segments of the population and to define the most appropriate actions to be undertaken.
Derfor er det ogs nžsten umuligt at vurdere, om rdsforordningens krav (3) om, at aktionerne til fremme af fżdevaresikkerhed skal bidrage til at forbedre levevilkrene for de fattigste befolkningsgrupper i modtagerlandene, bliver opfyldt. 
It is, therefore, also impossible to assess whether the stipulation (3) of the Council Regulation that food security operations must improve the living conditions of the poorest sections of the population in the recipient countries is being achieved.
3 ( ) Artikel 3, stk. 
(3) Articles 3(3) and 6(3).