natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ifżlge forordningen m der alene tages hensyn til de af projekterne genererede indtžgter, sfremt disse skaber vžsentlige nettofortjenester for initiativtagerne til projekterne. 
The Regulation requires revenue from projects to be taken into account only if substantial net revenue is generated for the promoters.
Medlemsstaterne har fet anvist metoder, som de har anvendt under hensyntagen til projekternes art. 
The Member States were given guidance on the method and applied it according to the particular nature of the projects submitted.
I forordningen om Samhżrighedsfonden henvises der til en stżtteberettigelsesdato for udgifterne, mens begrebet Čnye projekterÇ ikke er nžvnt. 
The Cohesion Fund Regulation mentions an eligibility date for expenditure but does not contain the concept of Ônew projectsŐ.
Forordningen tillader finansiering af projekter, der er under gennemfżrelse. 
It permits funding of projects which are already under way.
Den grundlžggende betingelse for stżtte er fastlagt i forordningens artikel 6 under henvisning til Maastricht-traktatens artikel 104 C. Samhżrighedsfonden har netop til forml gennem en mindskelse af finansieringsbyrden for de nationale budgetter at sikre, at de offentlige investeringer, der er nżdvendige for at indhente udvik-lingsefterslžbet, ikke modvirker den budgetmžssige konvergens. 
The linkage is set out in Article 6 of the Regulation in accordance with Article 104c of the Maastricht Treaty.
2.10.2000 2.10.2000 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 279/31 Ved de enkelte mżder i overvgningsudvalgene har Kommissionen regelmžssigt kontrolleret gennemfżrelsen af hvert enkelt projekt og om fornżdent fastlagt korrigerende foranstaltninger. 
2.10.2000 2.10.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 279/31 At every monitoring committee meeting, the Commission routinely monitored the status of each project and specified remedial action when necessary.
Overvgningsudvalgets indsats har gjort det muligt forholdsvis nżje at fżlge afviklingen af projekterne, herunder med hensyn til den żkonomiske forvaltning. 
This committee allowed a fairly close watch to be kept on the progress of projects, including their financial management.
Sfremt Kommissionens overvgningsopgaver skal udvides, kržver dette en vžsentlig forżgelse af det personale, der skal forvalte og overvge Samhżrighedsfondens projekter. 
Extending the CommissionŐs monitoring role would require a large increase in the staff assigned to managing and monitoring CF projects.
Samhżrighedsfondens virkninger er klart positive, og en gennemgang af tendenserne i de fire samhżrigheds-lande har vist lovende resultater for perioden 1994-1999. Forskellene mellem samhżrighedslandene og resten af Unionen er endvidere blevet vžsentligt formindsket. Endelig vil Kommissionen under hensyntagen til de tżjerne. 
The Cohesion Fund has had a clearly positive impact, trends in the four cohesion countries in the period 1994 to 1999 are encouraging and there has been appreciable progress in catching up with the rest of the Union. The Commission will make every effort to refine the assessment tools in the light of experience.
BUDGETGENNEMFŻRELSEN Udviklingen i finansiel henseende 9. 
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUDGET Financial development 9.
Koncentrationen af forpligtelser i slutningen af regnskabsret hžnger primžrt sammen med tidspunktet for medlemsstaternes indgivelse af stżtteansżgninger, der ofte ligger i slutningen af fżrste halvr. 
Commitments are concentrated at the end of the financial year largely because of the dates on which the Member States submit their applications Ń usually towards the end of the first six months of the year.
Ogs koncentrationen af betalingsbevillinger i slutningen af regnskabsret er en fżlge af tidspunktet for medlemsstaternes indgivelse af betalingsanmodninger. 
Similarly, payments are concentrated at the end of the year because of the dates on which Member States apply for payment.
For at žndre denne praksis er det i artikel C, stk. 2, i bilag II til den nye žndrede forordning fastsat, at forpligtelserne for de rlige trancher for projekterne generelt skal indgs inden den 30. april. 
In order to correct this situation, Article C(2) of Annex II to the new amended Regulation stipulates that the annual instalments for projects should generally be committed no later than 30 April.
4a, bestemt, at betalingsanmodningerne skal forelžgges tre gange om ret, senest den 1. marts, den 1. juli og den 1. november. 
Article C(4a) requires applications for payment to be submitted three times per year, at the latest on 1 March, 1 July and 1 November.
Faldet i antallet af nye projekter, der er blevet vedtaget i de seneste regnskabsr, skyldes det voksende antal forpligtelser vedrżrende beslutninger vedtaget de forudgende r, der er indget i form af rlige trancher. 
There have been fewer new project approvals in recent years because of the increasing number of commitments under decisions taken in previous years which involve the payment of annual instalments.
Dette er en fżlge af den hżjere prioritet, der er givet de store infrastrukturprojekter. 
This reflects the priority given to large infrastructure projects.
De uindfriede forpligtelser er forrsaget af finansieringsplanerne for projekterne, som gr lžngere end til den 31. december 1999. 
The amount awaiting settlement arises from the project financing plans, which cover a period extending beyond 31 December 1999.
De uindfriede forpligtelser er ikke tegn p en forsinket gennemfżrelse, men skyldes, som angivet i punkt 10, at projekterne stržkker sig over flere r. 
It does not reflect delays in execution but results, as already mentioned in the previous paragraph, from the fact that the projects cover several years.
Den usikkerhed, Revisionsretten henviser til, har sammenhžng med muligheden for variationer i ovennžvnte finansieringspla-opnede erfaringer sżrge for at forbedre evalueringsvžrk-ner. 
The uncertainty to which the Court refers is linked to possible variations in these financing plans.
Kommissionen har endnu ikke vžret i en situation med manglende betalingsbevillinger. 
The Commission has never found itself short of payment appropriations.
Under alle omstžndigheder tager Kommissionen hensyn til de uindfriede forpligtelser i budgetpro-grammeringen for hvert enkelt r. 
The Commission in any case allows for the outstanding amounts in the budgetary planning for each year.
Finansiel fordeling p sektorer 13. 
Distribution of finance by sector 13.
5, vurdere projekterne ud fra de bidrag, de kan yde til gennemfżrelsen af Fžllesskabets politik p miljżomrdet. 
Article 10(5) requires the Commission to assess projects on the basis of the contribution they can make to Community policies on the environment.
Kommissionen har ved anvendelsen af denne bestemmelse og under hensyntagen til nżdvendigheden af at undg en spredning af stżtten valgt at give prioritet til investeringerne vedrżrende spildevandsbehandling, drikkevandsforsyning og affaldshndte-ring. 
In applying this provision, and being mindful of the need to avoid dissipating its efforts, the Commission decided to give priority to investment in waste-water treatment, drinking-water supply and waste management.
5, som er anlagt af Kommissionen, fremgr allerede af den fżrste rapport om det finansielle samhżrighedsinstrument og om Samhżrighedsfonden, der blev udarbejdet i 1995. 
The CommissionŐs interpretation of the Article was already clearly enunciated in the first report on the Cohesion Financial Instrument and the CF produced in 1995.
Den hżjere prioritering af disse omrder fremgr endvidere af Kommissionens meddelelse af 22. november 1995 til Det Żkonomiske og Sociale Udvalg, Regionsudvalget, Europa-Parlamentet og Rdet om samhżrighedspolitikken og miljżet. 
The Communication of 22 November 1995 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on cohesion policy and the environment also stated that these were priority sectors.
Denne prioritering, der har medfżrt store fremskridt i samhżrighedslandene, blev for perioden 2000-2006 bekržftet i Kommissionens meddelelse af 1. juli 1999 om koordineringen mellem strukturfondene og Samhżrighedsfonden hvad angr programmerne for perioden 2000-2006. 
This priority allowed substantial progress to be made in the beneficiary Member States and was reaffirmed for the period 2000 to 2006 in the Commission Communication of 1 July 1999 on the Structural Funds and their coordination with the Cohesion Fund for programmes in the period 2000 to 2006.
Samhżrighedsfonden har dog trods alt ydet stżtte til bekžmpelse af erosion. 
However, the Cohesion Fund has also played a part, for example, in combating erosion.
Erfaringerne viser imidlertid, at der kržves en betydelig administrativ indsats fra EF-forvaltningerne og de nationale forvaltninger for at ivžrksžtte sdanne projekter, hvilket bekržfter, at denne form for stżtte egner sig bedre til programmer af den type, der finansieres af EFRU. 
Experience shows that, since such projects make considerable administrative demands on the Community and national authorities, this kind of operation is more appropriate to programmes of the type financed by the ERDF.
C 279/32 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 2.10.2000 Hvad angr jernbanesektoren skal Kommissionen fremhžve den stigning, der er registreret i de sidste r af perioden, hvor bidraget til sdanne projekter er steget kraftigt. 
C 279/32 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 2.10.2000 Commitments for rail transport showed an upward trend in the last years of the period, when there was a substantial increase in support for projects of this kind.
For s vidt angr havinfrastrukturer giver Kommissionen hżj prioritet til sżtransport, der er mindre forurenende. 
As regards maritime infrastructures, the Commission considers that maritime transport is a priority since it is less polluting.
Finansieringen af havneprojekter bżr derimod kun ske efter en grundig analyse af de konkrete tilfžlde. Ved denne analyse skal der tages hensyn til, at havneinvesteringerne ofte genererer vžsentlige indtžgter. 
On the other hand, detailed case studies have to be made for the financing of port development projects, bearing in mind that investment in ports often generates substantial revenue.
I analyserne skal der ligeledes tages hensyn til konkurrencepro-blemerne og problemerne med overkapaciteten i de żvrige trans-portsektorer. 
These studies must also address problems of competition and overcapacity affecting the other means of transport.
FORVALTNINGEN AF SAMHŻRIGHEDSFONDEN Programmering af projekterne Mangler ved vejledningen i udformningen af stżtteansżgninger 16. 
OBSERVATIONS ON THE MANAGEMENT OF THE COHESION FUND Programming the projects Deficiencies in the guidelines relating to applications for assistance 16.
Det er i forordning (EF) nr. 1164/94 ikke bestemt, at Kommissionen skal undersżge alternativerne til et projekt. 
Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 did not require the Commission to consider the alternatives to a project.
I żvrigt havde Kommissionen i sit forslag til forordningen medtaget et forslag om en sdan undersżgelse, men dette blev afvist af Rdet i 1994. 
Moreover, this had been suggested in the CommissionŐs proposal for a regulation but had been rejected by the Council in 1994.
Ved den seneste revision af nžvnte forordning er det imidlertid bestemt, at medlemsstaterne skal fremlžgge oplysninger om de undersżgte alternativer. 
However, the recent revision of this Regulation requires the Member States to provide information on the alternatives considered.
Kommissionen har som regel fet forelagt costbenefitanalyser eller andre analyser af de żkonomiske virkninger, men disse har vžret af en meget svingende kvalitet. 
The Commission has usually received cost-benefit analyses or other analyses of economic impact, albeit of uneven quality.
Endvidere er der afholdt flere seminarer i medlemsstaterne for at sikre, at de berżrte forvaltninger modtager de nżdvendige oplysninger. 
Several workshops were held in the Member States to brief the administrations concerned.
For grupper af projekter rder Kommissionen normalt altid over oplysninger om projekternes art, geografiske placering og omkostninger. 
Generally, the Commission always has available information on the nature, location and cost of groups of projects.
Overvgningsudvalgene fr forelagt datablade for hver gruppe af projekter, som for de enkelte projekter indeholder oplysninger om geografisk placering, omkostninger samt udnyttelsen af betalingsbevillingerne. 
The forms drawn up for each group of projects are placed before the monitoring committees, with information on location, cost and status of expenditure for each project.
Hvad angr de fire grupper af projekter, der er nžvnt af Revisionsretten, er oplysningerne om geografisk placering og omkostninger for visse mindre undergruppers vedkommende blevet forelagt samlet af medlemsstaten. 
The location and amounts for some small subprojects within the four project groups mentioned by the Court were submitted in summary form by the Member State concerned.
Ved vedtagelsen af forordning (EF) nr. 
When Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 was adopted, it included specific provisions for taking account of receipts.
Ved stżrstedelen af de mindre miljżprojekter, der medfinansieres i Gržkenland, har Kommissionen i de fleste tilfžlde anvendt satsen 80 % i stedet for 85 %, da de finansierede aktioner har medfżrt potentielle indtžgter, der overstiger driftsomkostningerne. 
For most small environmental projects co-financed in Greece, the Commission generally applied a rate of 80 % and not 85 %, since the operations funded could potentially generate revenue exceeding the operating costs.
Costbenefitanalyserne gennemfżres af konsulenter efter anmodning fra initiativtagerne til projekterne. 
Cost-benefit analyses are commissioned from consultants by the project promoters.
De anvendte metoder kan variere (se svar p punkt 91-94), bl.a. hvad angr behandlingen af driftsomkostninger og finansielle omkostninger. 
The methods used may vary (see reply to paragraphs 91 to 94), especially as regards handling of operating costs and financial charges.
Kommissionen har imidlertid altid żnsket, at medlemsstaterne fremlžgger flere projekter, end der er bevillinger til, for derved at kunne foretage en bedre projektud-vžlgelse. 
However, the Commission has always asked the Member States to submit more projects than can be funded so that a better selection can be made.
Nr Kommissionen finder, at et projekt ikke opfylder forordningens stżtteberettigelses-og prioritetskriterier, underretter den medlemsstaten om rsagerne til denne holdning. 
When the Commission considers that a project does not satisfy the RegulationŐs eligibility and priority criteria, it informs the Member State of its reasons.
Men igen indeholder forordningen ingen bestemmelser om formelle afvisningsbeslutninger. 
However, the Regulation makes no provision for formal rejection decisions.
Koordineringen af Samhżrighedsfonden og EFRU 23. 
Coordination between the Cohesion Fund and the ERDF 23.
For perioden 2000-2006 forventes den referenceramme, der er fastsat for transport-og miljżomrdet, at gżre det muligt yderligere at styrke denne synergi og sikre sammenhžn-gen. 
For the period 2000 to 2006, the reference framework drawn up for the transport and environment sectors should make it possible to enhance such synergy and ensure coherence.
Kommissionen finder ikke, at der er konflikt mellem den tilstržbte optimering af de bevillinger, der tildeles de finansielle instrumenter og EFRU, og sammenhžngen i strukturpolitikkerne under t. 
The Commission does not believe that the aim of optimising appropriations allocated to the Financial Instruments and the ERDF conflicts with the overall coherence of structural policies.
Kommissionen er af den opfattelse, at det med samhż-righedsfondsstżttens koncentration p sektorer og korridorer er muligt samtidigt at opn en optimering af bevillingsudnyttelsen og en sammenhžngende politik. 
Its view is that the concentration of Cohesion Fund operations on specific sectors and corridors makes it possible both to optimise the use of funds and to ensure that policies are coherent.
Budgethensyn og sektorbestemte hensyn 26. 
Budgetary and sectoral constraints 26.
Sammenlignelighed er ikke et krav i forordningen om Samhżrighedsfonden. 
Comparability is not required by the CF Regulation.
2.10.2000 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 279/33 28. 
2.10.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 279/33 28.
Kommissionen skal blot sżrge for en passende fordeling mellem omrderne, hvilket den ogs har gjort. 
The Commission is required to ensure that resources are suitably allocated between the fields, and this has been fully achieved.
En stor del af Samhżrighedsfondens midler gr til infrastrukturprojekter i de pgžldende lande. 
The Cohesion FundŐs resources are to a large extent devoted to big projects which play a pivotal role in the economies of the countries concerned.
Disse projekter indgr i en planlžgning og kržver lang tids forberedelse. 
These form part of a planning process and require lengthy preparation.
Andre projekter gennemfżres p grundlag af sektorplaner, der udarbejdes p det mest velegnede niveau (nationalt, regionalt eller niveauet for de enkelte afvandingsomrder). 
Other projects are covered by sectoral plans drawn up at the appropriate territorial level (national, regional, by catchment area).
De kriterier, ud fra hvilke kvaliteten af projektudarbejdelsen og projekternes ČmodningsgradÇ mles, er meget vigtige for projektudvžlgelsen bde p nationalt plan og p EF-plan. 
The standards of project preparation and project maturity are very important criteria for selection at both national and Community level.
Kommissionen finder, at sammenhžngen mellem projekter er sikret gennem koncentrationen af stżtten p sektorer og transportkorridorer. 
The Commission believes that inter-project coherence has been ensured by concentrating operations on specific sectors and transport corridors.
Denne sammenhžng er et resultat af et partnerskab med medlemsstaten under planlžgningen og forberedelsen af projekterne. 
This was achieved through partnership with the Member State, covering programming and project preparation.
Kommissionen żnsker ligeledes at gżre opmžrksom p den funktionelle forbindelse, der i mange tilfžlde er mellem de finansierede projekter. 
The Commission also draws attention to the functional links between many of the projects funded.
Projekternes geografiske fordeling 32. 
Geographical distribution of the projects 32.
Alle de af Samhżrighedsfonden finansierede projekter behandles, vedtages og overvges af Kommissionen efter samme fremgangsmde og ud fra samme kriterier. 
The Commission applies the same procedure and criteria in preparing, adopting and monitoring all the projects financed from the Cohesion Fund.
Hvad angr stżttesatsen fastlžgges denne i henhold til artikel 7, stk. 1, under hensyntagen til den stżtte, medlemsstaten har ansżgt om. 
At Commission level, there are thus no differences in treatment. The co-financing rate is determined on the basis of Article 7(1), taking account of the assistance requested by the Member State.
Langsommelige godkendelsesprocedurer 33-37. 
Slowness of the approval procedures 33-37.
I henhold til forordningen skal Kommissionen i almindelighed tržffe beslutning inden tre mneder, forudsat at medlemsstaten har fremlagt alle de i forordningen kržvede oplysninger. 
The Regulation stipulates that the Commission should generally decide within three months, provided the Member State has supplied all the information which the Regulation requires.
De forsinkede godkendelser skyldes bl.a.: Ń en ufuldstžndig udfyldning af ansżgningsformularerne, som har bevirket, at Samhżrighedsfonden har mttet udbede sig yderligere oplysninger Ń utilstržkkelige forpligtelsesbevillinger, idet antallet af projekter overstiger de disponible bevillinger (se ogs svarene p punkt 10 og 20, stk. 1) Ń manglende oplysninger om overholdelsen af fžllesskabspoli-tikkerne, bl.a. med hensyn til miljż og tildeling af offentlige kontrakter. 
Delays in approval may be caused by: Ń incompleteapplicationforms,leadingtorequestsfromtheCF for further information, Ń insufficient commitment appropriations, with too many projects for the resources available (see also replies to paragraphs 10 and 20-a), Ń lack of information on compliance with Community policies, especially as regards the environment and the award of public contracts.
Som hovedregel indeholder beslutningerne om individuelle projekter samt stżtteansżgningerne nżjagtige oplysninger om geografisk placering (se svar p punkt 17). 
As a general rule, applications for individual projects state the location precisely (see reply to paragraph 17).
Medlemsstaten forelžgger overvgningsudvalget detaljerede oplysninger om gennemfżrelsen af det enkelte projekt i gruppen. 
In the monitoring committee, the Member State provides detailed information on the execution of each project within the group.
Som led i strukturfondenes indsats i Irland var der fżr indfżrelsen af Samhżrighedsfonden allerede ydet stżtte til en ržkke projektafsnit. 
In the framework of the Structural Funds in Ireland, elements of a number of projects had been funded prior to the introduction of the Cohesion Fund.
Kommissionen finder, at de afsnit, der er stżttet af Samhżrighedsfonden, er klart specificeret og kan betragtes som projektfaser (se svar p punkt 40-41). 
The Commission considers that the elements covered under the Cohesion Fund were clearly identified and constituted project stages (see reply to paragraphs 40 and 41).
De fire projektansżgninger vedrżrende Belview Port i Waterford indebar anlžg af en ny tilkżrselsvej til havnen, en ny bevogtet jernbaneoverskžring, udvidelse af havnekajen og oprensning af tilsejlingen til havnen. 
The four project applications concerning Belview port, Waterford, involved a new port access road, a new controlled rail crossing, the extension of the port quay and the dredging of the harbour approaches.
De irske myndigheder indgav sžrskilte ansżgninger p forskellige tidspunkter mellem juni 1993 og februar 1994. 
The applications were submitted separately by the Irish authorities on various dates between June 1993 and February 1994.
Samhżrighedsfondens stżtte til hvert enkelt projekt blev godkendt ved beslutninger truffet mellem november 1993 og juli 1996. 
CF assistance to each project was approved by decisions on dates between November 1993 and July 1996.
Kommissionen accepterede af isžr fżlgende rsager, at der blev indgivet sžrskilte projektansżgninger for disse fire forbedrings-projekter: Ń Kommissionen betragtede det som en fordel, at gennemsigtigheden af Samhżrighedsfondens stżtte til de forskellige trans-portsektorer (vej, jernbane, havn osv.) ville blive sikret ved en behandling af sžrskilte ansżgninger. 
The Commission accepted separate project applications in respect of these four improvement projects principally for the following reasons. Ń The Commission saw an advantage in the treatment of separate applications on grounds of ensuring transparency of CF assistance between the various transport sectors (road, rail, port, etc.)
Ń Som fżlge af disse projekters art (vej-, jernbane-og havnefor-bedringer) og kompetencefordelingen i transportanliggender hos den irske forvaltning havde tre forskellige myndigheder ansvaret for fremlžggelsen af projekterne. 
Ń There were three separate implementing authorities responsible for delivering these projects in view of their nature (road, rail and port improvements) and the division of responsibility for such transport issue in the Irish administrative system.
Ń De sžrskilte ansżgninger gjorde det muligt hurtigt at tržffe beslutninger i sager, hvor Kommissionen umiddelbart kunne indvillige i at stżtte projektet (f.eks. tilkżrselsvejen til havnen og jernbaneoverskžringen). 
Ń Separate applications allowed the early adoption of decisions in cases where the Commission could quickly agree to assist the project (e.g. the port access and rail crossing projects).