natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den anden kontrakt, Kommissionen underskrev, kom i stand, efter at samme konsulent havde foreslet, at de modeller, der var udviklet i forbindelse med den fżrste kontrakt, skulle anvendes p alle Fondens foranstaltninger, sledes at konsulenten kunne vurdere projekternes effekt p kort, mellemlang og lang sigt p żkonomiske nżglevariabler, ssom indkomster, regional vžkst, private investeringer og beskžftigelsen. 
The second contract signed by the Commission was in response to a proposal from the same consultant, suggesting that the use of the models created under the first contract should be extended to all the CF measures, so that the consultant would be able to estimate the short, medium and long-term impact of projects on key economic variables such as income, regional growth, private investment and employment.
Denne kontraktudvidelse burde ikke have vžret nżdvendig, eftersom det allerede i den fżrste kontrakt var fastsat, at Kommissionen selv skulle have et velegnet og operationelt vžrktżj (model-ler og database) til mling af Fondens effekt. 
This extension to the contract ought not to have been necessary, since the first contract had already provided that the Commission was to be supplied with an adequate, operational tool (models and database), so that it could ascertain the impact of the CF for itself.
Det str udtrykkeligt i begge kontrakter, at alle kontrahentens resultater samt programmellet og databasen, der er etableret til formlet, er Kommissionens ejendom. 
In fact, the contracts specify on each occasion that all the results obtained by the contractor, as well as the software needed for the application and the database created for that purpose, are the property of the Commission.
Udgifterne i forbindelse med den fżrste kontrakt belżb sig til 674 403,98 euro. 
The expenditure associated with the first contract amounted to EUR 674 403,98.
Retten har ved gennemgang af tjenesteyderens rejseudgifter konstateret, at Kommissionen i mange tilfžlde har refunderet flyrejser p business class, selv om det i artikel 1a i bilag IV til kontrakten er fastsat, at flyrejser godtgżres med prisen for billetter p żkonomiklasse. 
Examination of the service providersŐ travel expenses showed that in many cases the Commission refunded the cost of travel by air in business class, whereas Annex IV to the contract stipulated in Article 1(a) that travel expenses would be refunded up to the price of economy-class tickets.
Hvad angr den anden kontrakt, der blev underskrevet den 1. april 1997, og som skulle vžre opfyldt senest den 31. marts 2000, var der frem til den 31. januar 2000 ikke foretaget nogen betalinger. 
In the case of thesecondcontract,whichwassignedon1April1997andseta time limit of 31 March 2000 for performance, there were no payments until 31 January 2000.
Overensstemmelse med evalueringsformlet 77. 
Conformity with the evaluation objectives 77.
Med det forml at foretage en ensartet analyse af fondsstżt-tenseffektidefireberżrtelandefulgtedenipunkt72nžvnte konsulent en nyskabende fremgangsmde. Han brugte tre indbyrdes supplerende modeller: autoregressive vektormodeller, generelle ligevžgtsmodeller, som kan beregnes p regionalt plan, og 
C 279/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 2.10.2000 approach, using three complementary methods vector autore-gression models (VAR), regional computable general equilibrium models (CGE) and models of explicit distribution dynamics (MEDD).
Modellerne er nžrmere beskrevet i bilaget. 
The models are described in more detail in the Annex.
Hvilken indflydelse har denne effekt p de omgivende żkonomier og p EU generelt? Hvilken indvirkning har projekterne p den żkonomiske og sociale samhżrighed i EU? 
What effectdoesthishaveonadjacenteconomiesandontheCommu-nity in general? What is the impact of the measures on the economic and social cohesion of the Union?
Fordelingsmodellerne blev i realiteten ikke anvendt til en direkte evaluering af projekternes effekt. 
The MDRF models were not, in fact, used to evaluate the impact of CF projects directly.
De tager sigte p vžkst-og konvergensdynamikken i samtlige regioner i de fire stżtteberettigede lande samt i visse andre lande Ń i dette tilfžlde Frankrig, Det Forenede Kongerige og Italien Ń og anvendes bl.a., nr man vil undersżge, om indkomstudviklingen p regionalt plan konver-gerer eller divergerer i en bestemt periode, og hvordan indkomstfordelingen udvikler sig p regionalt plan. 
They are concerned with the dynamics of growth and convergence of all the regions of the four cohesion countries, as well as of other countries like France, the United Kingdom and Italy, and are used to examine questions such as the tendency of regional incomes to converge or diverge over time and the dynamic in the regional distribution of income.
Analyserne vedrżrer perioden 1980-1990. 
The analyses apply to the period 1980 to 1990.
De viser, at den voksende ulighed skyldes, at vžksten i nogle grupper af naboregioner ikke er den samme som vžksten i andre grupper af naboregioner, og at resultaterne i en region afhžnger af naboregionerne. 
They show that the increasing inequality can be explained by the fact that the growth achieved by groups of neighbouring regions is different from that of other adjacent groups and that the performance of one region can be explained by neighbouring regions.
Desuden vil resultaterne af analysen af de offentlige og private investeringers afsmittende effekt kunne anvendes ved en vurdering af de projekter, der er gennemfżrt i perioden 1993-1999. 
Furthermore, the results concerning spillover from public and private investmentcouldbetakenintoaccountforanappraisaloftheCF projects carried out in the period 1993 to 1999.
Vektormodellerne og balancemodellerne skulle anvendes til evaluering af hvert projekts effekt i forskellige henseender, navnlig virkningerne i den direkte berżrte region, de afsmittende virkninger i andre regioner og den samlede żkonomi og effekten p samhżrigheden og konvergensen. 
The aim of the VAR and CGE models was to evaluate the impacts of individual projects from a number of viewpoints, including the effects on the region directly concerned, the spill-over onto other regions and the whole economy and the impact on cohesion and convergence.
Ved hjžlp af disse modeller kan der udarbejdes mere udtżmmende svar, og deres respektive resultater er - nr de er sammenlignelige - som hovedregel kohžrente. 
These models can provide additional answers and the results which they give, when they are comparable, are usually consistent.
Disse modeller burde have vžret anvendt mere konsekvent. 
A more complete application of these models might have been useful.
Vektormodel 2, hvis modelkonstruktion er mere fuldstžndig end vektormodel 1, blev kun anvendt p de spanske regioner, fordi der hervaradgangtilmereomfattendeogdetaljeredeoplysningerom historiske tendenser. 
For example, VAR2, which is more complete than VAR1 from the modelling viewpoint, was applied only to the Spanish regions, because they were able to provide more, detailed information in terms of historical series.
Og balancemodellen, som bygger p en klar regional opdeling, kunne have vžret anvendt til en analyse af Fondens effekt p de regionale skžvheder i de stżtteberettigede lande. 
Likewise, the CGE model, which takes a large regional breakdown into account, could be used to analyse the implications of the CF for regional inequality in the cohesion countries.
Disse modeller egner sig ikke s godt til evaluering af effekten af miljżprojekter, de er mere velegnede til transportinfrastrukturprojekter. 
These models have their limitations as regards evaluating the impact of environmental projects and are more suitable for transport infrastructure projects.
I żvrigt har man ved udvžlgelsen af de projekter, der blev analyseret med modellerne, tilsyneladende foretrukket transportinfrastrukturprojekter. 
Furthermore, the selection of projects analysed by means of these models gave preference to transport infrastructure projects.
Disse modeller (vektormodellerne, balancemodellerne og for-delingsmodellerne) giver nogle interessante og nyttige analyseresultater vedrżrende projekternes potentielle effekt p mellemlang eller lang sigt, og de hjžlper dermed til en bedre forstelse af de direkte virkninger, men de anvendte modeller samordnes ikke. 
Even though these models (VAR, CGE and MEDD) provide useful and interesting results about the potential impact of CF intervention and thus help towards a better understanding of the related effects, there is no real coordination between the models used.
I żvrigt viser ingen af disse modeller, hvor stor unżjagtighed resultaterne er forbundet med, fordi de indsamlede data er af drlig kvalitet, eller fordi der ikke foreligger tilstržkkelige data, eller fordi de anvendte ekstrapoleringsmetoder har visse begržnsninger. 
Furthermore, none of the models specifies, for the results obtained, the level of imprecision that is due to the poor quality or availability of the data collected or to the limits of the extrapolation methods used.
Kommissionen har ikke sammenholdt eller harmoniseret analyseresultaterne for p dette grundlag at kunne uddrage mere generelle konklusioner om Fondens effekt p de fire stżtteberettigede landes żkonomier. 
The Commission did not carry out any reconciliation of the results obtained from these models and did not carry out the necessary harmonisation of them in order to establish overall conclusions in terms of the CFŐs impact on the economies of the four cohesion countries.
De sžrskilte resultater af hver enkelt model er som helhed positive. 
The results produced by each model separately are generally positive.
Kommissionen burde sżrge for at videreudvikle dette makrożkonomiske projektevalueringsredskab og gżre mere omfattende brug af det. 
It is recommended that the Commission refine this resource for evaluating projects mac-roeconomically and that it apply it more fully.
Modeller udviklet p initiativ af medlemsstaterne 83. 
Models developed on Member StatesŐ initiative 83.
Kun Spanien har med żkonomisk stżtte fra Fonden foretaget en undersżgelse af Fondens samlede makrożkonomiske effekt p landets żkonomi. 
Only Spain has used CF financial support to carry out a study of the overall macroeconomic impact of the CF on the national economy.
Denne undersżgelse, som blev forelagt i november 1995, var baseret p tre modeller (input/output, Moisees og Hermin) (jf. bilaget). 84. 
The approach that was adopted for this study, which was presented in November 1995, was to use three models (Input/output, Moisees and Hermin) (see the Annex).
Portugal har for enkelte stżrre projekters vedkommende, f.eks. den nye bro over Tejo, evalueret projektets effekt. Evalueringen var primžrt baseret p en input/output-model. 
84.Portugalcarriedoutspecificimpactassessmentsforsome major projects, such as the new bridge over the Tagus, using what is essentially an input/output model.
De żvrige stżtteberettigede lande har hverken p nationalt eller regionalt plan foretaget specifikke undersżgelser af projekternes eller af selve Fondens makrożkonomiske effekt. 
The other cohesion countries have not produced any special studies at national or regional level on the macroeconomic impact of projects, or of the CF itself.
Costbenefitanalyse 85. 
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) 85.
Den costbenefitanalyse, som de stżtteberettigede medlemsstater skal forelžgge sammen med projektforslagene, er et af de vigtigste kriterier for beslutningen om, hvorvidt der kan ydes stżtte fra Fonden. 
When the projects submitted by the Member States concerned are being examined, cost-benefit analysis is one of the main criteria for the decision on whether to grant Community assistance.
Kommissionen kan efter behov f bistand fra EIB til evalueringen af projekterne (jf. punkt 15). 
The Commission can, if necessary, call on the European Investment Bank to assist in the project evaluation (see paragraph 15).
P transportinfrastrukturomrdet er costbenefitanalyserne som hovedregel baseret p langvarige erfaringer og gennemprżvede metoder, der bl.a. gżrdetmuligtatsžttetalpalledenżdvendigeparametre. 
In the field of transport infrastructure the CBAs are usually based on long experience and a well-established methodology which allows, amongst other things, quantification of all the necessary parameters.
P miljżomrdet har problemerne med at sžtte tal p de forventede fordele derimod i mange tilfžlde foranlediget medlemsstaterne til i stedet for kvantitative analyser at gżre brug af metoder af mere kvalitativ karakter. 
In the environment field, on the other hand, the difficulty of quantifying the expected benefits has often led Member States to use methods of a more qualitative and less quantitative nature.
2.10.2000 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 279/21 87. 
2.10.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 279/21 87.
Sfremt Kommissionen finder costbenefitanalysen utilstržkkelig eller ikke sžrlig overbevisende, kan den anmode medlemsstaterne om at fremsende yderligere oplysninger eller udbygge analysen, eventuelt med henblik p at f omdefineret de pgžldende projekter, og for visse projekters vedkommende kan resultatet blive, at de ikke godkendes til EF-stżtte. 
If the Commission finds the CBA insufficient or unconvinc-ing it may ask the Member States to provide additional information or to extend the analysis, and this may lead to a redefinition of the projects in question or, even, ultimately to a refusal of Community funding for certain projects.
Drikkevandsforsy-ningsprojektet i Grand Porto og džmningsprojektet i Enxo (Portugal) blev sledes žndret betydeligt i omfang efter mere indgende costbenefitanalyser. 
For example, projects such as the Gran Porto drinking water supply or the Enxo (Portugal) dam were rescaled following the extension of the CBA.
Trods Kommissionens bestržbelser p dette felt, navnlig udsendelsen i juni 1997 af en vejledning i costbenefitanalyse af stżrre projekter i forbindelse med EFŐs regionalpolitik, har Retten ved gennemgang af costbenefitanalyserne konstateret, at forslagsstillerne behandler og beregner de sociożkonomiske variabler inden for samme sektor og inden for samme medlemsstat meget forskelligt. 
Examination of the CBAs showed that despite the CommissionŐs efforts in the matter (notably the publication in June 1997 of a guide to the analysis of the costs and benefits of large-scale projects within the Community regional framework), the treatment and calculation of socioeconomic variables can differ widely between promoters within the same sectoral field and the same Member State.
De grundlžggende begreber i relation til costbenefitanalyser (aktualiseret nettovžrdi, intern rente, diskonteringssats, faste eller lżbende priser, fiskale aspekter, fżlsomhedsanalyse (1) osv.) forsts ikke altid p samme mde. 
Basic CBA concepts (net present value, internal rate of return, discountrate,constantorcurrentprices,taxaspects,sensitivity analysis (1), etc.) are not always understood in the same way by the parties concerned.
Ofte er de eksterne faktorer ikke evalueret og kvantificeret i tilstržkkeligt omfang. 
External factors are often insufficiently evaluated and quantified.
Der tages kun sjžldent hensyn til evalueringen af projektets gennemfżrlighed, risici og alternative muligheder. 
Evaluating the feasibility, risks or alternative options is rarely considered.
Oplysningerne om de sociożkonomiske omkostninger og fordele er i visse tilfžlde ufuldstžndige, og ofte tages der kun hensyn til de finansielle aspekter. 
The socioeconomic costs or benefits are sometimes incomplete and sometimes only the financial aspects are taken into account.
I forbindelse med vandforsyningsprojektet i Lissabon var det sledes ikke muligt at se sammenhžngen mellem de indtžgter, den endelige modtager ville f fra hele forsyningsnettet, og den investering, der skulle finansieres af Fonden. 
Thus in the case of the Lisbon water-distribution network project it was not possible to establish any link between the revenue received by the final beneficiary over all the networks and the investment financed by the CF.
I forbindelse med et projekt, der gik ud p bygning af rensningsanlžg til fremstilling af drikkevand og et afsaltningsanlžg p Ibiza, blev vandprisen i 1994 beregnet til 95 ESP/m3 (ca. 
For the drinking-water treatment plants, the Ibiza-desalination plant project, the price of water was calculated in 1994 as 95 ESP/m3 (approximately 0,48 EUR/m3) in the CBA, whereas the real price was, for 1997, 213,84 ESP/m3 (approximately 1,07 EUR/m3).
0,48 euro/m3) i costbenefitanalysen, mens den faktiske pris i 1997 var 213,84 ESP/m3 (ca. 1,07 euro/m3). I forbindelse med projektet ČLimerick City Water SupplyÇ tages der i costbenefitanalysen ikke hensyn til indtžgter fra den private sektor p ca. 
The CBA for the Limerick City Water Supply Project did not take into account private-sector revenue, which amounted to around IEP 1,2 million (approximately EUR 1,6 million) in 1997.
I forbindelse med samme projekt er den interne rente beregnet p grundlag af en afskrivningsperiode p 25 r, men anlžgsarbejdernes levetid er fastsat til 50 r. 
For the same project the IRT was calculated on the basis of a 25-year period, whereas the lifetime of the associated buildings was assumed to be 50 years.
I forbindelse med projektet ČTralee landfill siteÇ er det kun de finansielle aspekter, der er medtaget i costbenefitanalysen, der ses helt bort fra de sociożkonomiske aspekter. 
Only the financial aspects were considered in the CBA of the Tralee landfill site project, which ignored the socioeconomic aspects.
I forbindelse med projektet ČBelview Rail CrossingÇ er der ikke foretaget nogen beregning af den interne rente, men kun angivet, at der forventes żkonomiske fordele af projektet i form af tidsbesparelser, uden at de er nžrmere kvantificeret. 
The Belview rail crossing project does not contain an IRT calculation and states only that economic benefits are expected in terms of time saving, without quantifying them.
(1) Fżlsomhedsanalysen er en undersżgelse af, hvilken indvirkning en žndring af de afgżrende skżn over omkostninger og fordele vil f p et projekts rentabilitet eller aktualiserede vžrdi. 
(1) Sensitivity analysis: study of the possible effect of a change in crucial estimates relating to costs and benefits on the profitability or actual value of a project.
I forbindelse med projektet ČMotorvejen Pathe-F-broenÇ blev investeringsomkostningerne i costbenefitanalysen anslet til ca. 4 millioner euro, mens den anlžgskontrakt, der blev undertegnet, lżd p ca. 
The CBA for the Autoroute Pathe-F-Pont project estimated an investment cost of around EUR 4 million, whereas the construction contract signed was for an amount of some EUR 2,3 million.
Nr costbenefitanalyserne bygger p s forskellige begreber og fortolkninger, giver det meget forskelligartede resultater, afhžngigt af de valgte hypoteser, og det kan igen fżre til en fejlagtig vurdering af fordele og ulemper ved et givet projekt i forhold til andre. 
This disparity between design and interpretation in relation to the application of CBAs tends to produce results which differ according to the hypotheses adopted and may distort the appraisal of the benefits or drawbacks of a given project relative to others.
Kommissionen bżr sżrge for at udarbejde mere pržcise retningslinjer p dette felt, s der anvendes mere ensartede metoder navnlig med hensyn til, hvilke oplysninger der m forlanges sammen med costbenefitanalyserne, s den kan kontrollere analysernes plidelighed og sikre den nżdvendige sammenlignelighed. 
The Commission should be careful to draw up more precise guidelines on this point in order to harmonise the methods applied, particularly as regards the essential information that must be submitted with CBAs so that their reliability can be verified and they are comparable.
Indikatorer 93. 
Indicators 93.
De indikatorer, de nationale myndigheder angiver for de projekter, der żnskes finansieret af Fonden, er meget ofte de samme som dem, der anvendes i forbindelse med EFRU. 
The indicators submitted in support of CF projects by national authorities are very often the same ones that are used for the ERDF.
Nogle af disse indikatorer, der er overtaget fra EFRU, indgr i en generel stżttestrategi baseret p programmeringskonceptet og en kontekst, der tager specifikt sigte p et bestemt overordnet ml, der er opdelt i en ržkke klart definerede delml. Ved gennemfżrelsen af flerrige foranstaltninger bliver disse delml til operationelle ml, som indpasses i et sammenhžngende sžt prioriterede indsatsomrder. 
Some of these indicators from the ERDF are part of a general system of measures that are programme-based, located in a specific context relative to an overall objective and are determined by a number of specific objectives that give rise to operational objectives within a cohesive set of priorities as part of the implementation of multiannual measures.
Sdanne indikatorer er ikke i alle tilfžlde blevet udbygget og forbedret, s de kan anvendes p de sžrlige forhold, der gżr sig gžldende for Fondens projekter, specielt inden for de to berżrte sektoromrder (transportinfrastruktur og miljż). 
The indicators were not always improved and made more detailed in order to adapt them to the particular nature of CF projects, especially in the context of the two sectoral fields in question (transport infrastructure and environment).
De indikatorer, der er blevet anvendt i forbindelse med Fonden, er sledes i visse tilfžlde alt for generelle eller ikke detaljerede nok til, at et projekts forlżb kan kontrolleres ordentligt, og der kan sžttes tal p dets effekt og resultater. Nogle af de stżtteberettigede medlemsstater Ń f.eks. Portugal Ń har p eget initiativ indfżrt et system, hvor der hvert kvartal eller hvert halve r skal udfyldes et kontrolskema. 
Furthermore, the indicators that are used in the CF framework are sometimes too general, or lack the detail required for proper verification of a projectŐs progress, or the quantification of its impact and performance. Some of the cohesion Member States, Portugal, for example, have, on their own initiative, developed and introduced quarterly or six-monthly monitoring forms setting out the data that is to be collected in order to provide the requisite information on progress, physical implementation and impact, together with the corresponding indicators.
Kun nogle f ansvarlige myndigheder har taget sdanne initiativer til at forbedre de indikatorer, der anvendes i forbindelse med Fonden p nationalt plan, og de er ikke blevet harmoniseret, og heller ikke anvendt konsekvent i de stżtteberettigede lande. 
These attempts to improve the indicators within the CF framework at national level are the work of a few responsible authorities and are not harmonised, nor are they generally used in the cohesion countries.
Kommissionen burde sżrge for at udarbejde mere relevante indikatorer, der tager specifikt sigte p sektorprojekterne under Fonden, eller forbedre de eksisterende indikatorer uden at gżre tilsynsmetoderne unżdigt komplicerede. Mlet m vžre at kunne sžtte tal p de forbedringer, der er sket inden for den pgžldende sektor, og at bidrage til en bžredygtig udvikling og at foretage sammenligninger inden for samme sektor. 
The Commission should develop more relevant indicators that specifically apply to CF sectoral projects or it should improve them, without making the monitoring method unnecessarily cumbersome, so that it is possible to represent the improvement of the sector concerned quantitatively, to promote sustainable development and to make sector-wide comparisons.
C 279/22 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 2.10.2000 Evaluering af afsluttede projekter Kommissionen 96. 
C 279/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 2.10.2000 Evaluation of closed projects Commission 96.