natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bilag Bilag I - Kommissionens og INEA's ansvar vedrżrende CEF-forvaltning 42 Andre parter, som INEA indgr kontrakt med INEA-foranstaltninger Bidrag til udarbejdelse af a rbe j ds prog ra m Arbejdsprogram Fastlžggelse af udvžlgelses-og tildelingskriterier Udnyttelse af synergier Fastlžggelse og vedtagelse af a rbe j ds prog ra m CEF-udvalg Udarbejdelse af indkaldelsestekst Kommunikations-foranstaltninger (Info Day) Helpdesk Indkaldelser af forslag Samarbejde om Info Days Feedback om indkaldelses-teksten Eksterne eksperter, obs ervatżrer Stżtteberettigelses-og antagelighedskontrol Udvžlgelse af evaluatorer Tilrettelžggelse af evalueringer Information til ansżgere Projektudvžlgelse Endelig udvžlgelse af projekter Rapportering til medlemsstaterne Andre GD'er, CEF-udvalg Kontaktpunkt for ansżgere Underskrivelse af tilskudsaftaler Kommunikations-foranstaltninger Tilskuds-aftale Standardtilskuds aftaler Andre GD'er, Juridisk Tjeneste Revisionsfirmaer Kommunikations-foranstaltninger Betalinger og inddrivelser Teknisk og finansielt tilsyn med projekter Revisioner Projekt-opfżlgning Synergier mellem Horisont 2020 og CEF Gennemgang af projektportefżljer Skržddersyede rapporter (ogs til korridorkoordinat orer) Statistik Feedback til interessenter Overvgning af forvaltningsorganet Hżringer af interessenter Formidling af arbejdsprogram-resultater Projektlivs-cyklus Foranstaltninger truffet af de overordnede GD'er Andre parter p anmodning af de overordnede GD'er Kilde: Revisionsretten. 
Annexes Annex I — Commission and INEA responsibilities in the area of CEF management 42 Other parties contracted by INEA INEA actions Contribution to preparation of work programme Work programme Definition of selection and award criteria Exploitation of synergies Definition & adoption of Work Programme (WP) CEF committees Preparation of call text Communication actions (Info Day) Helpdesk Calls for proposals Collaboration on Info Days Feed-back on the text of calls External experts, obs ervers Eligibility and admissibility checks Selection of evaluators Organisation of evaluations Information to applicants Project selection Final selection of projects Reporting to Member States Other DGs, CEF committees Single contact point for applicants Signature of grant agreements Communication actions Grant agreement Model grant agreements Other DGs, Legal Service Audit firms Communication actions Payments & recoveries Technical and financial supervision of projects Audits Project follow-up Synergies between H2020 & CEF Project portfolio reviews Tailored reports (incl. to Corridor coordinators) Statistics Feedback to stakeholders Monitoring of the Agency Stakeholder consultations Dissemination of WP results Project lifecycle Action by parent DGs Other parties at request of parent DGs Source: ECA.
Glossar og forkortelser Aktionsstatusrapport: Et dokument, som stżttemodtagerne bruger til at rapportere om deres projekters tekniske fremskridt i forhold til den oprindelige plan og den hermed forbundne budgetudnyttelse. 
Glossary and abbreviations ASR - action status report: a document used by beneficiaries to report on the technical progress of their projects compared to the initial plan and the associated use of the budget.
Det er det vigtigste dokument, som INEA bruger til at fżlge og gennemg projektfremskridt. 
It is the main document used by INEA to follow and review the progress of a project.
CEF - Connecting Europe-faciliteten: En facilitet, der siden 2014 har ydet finansiel stżtte til tre sektorer: energi (CEF-E), transport (CEF-T) og informations-og kommunikationsteknologi (CEF-IKT). 
CEF - Connecting Europe Facility: a facility, which, since 2014, has provided financial aid to three sectors: energy (CEF-E), transport (CEF-T), and information and communication technology (CEF-ICT).
P disse tre omrder identificerer CEF investeringsprioriteter, f.eks. el-og gaskorridorer, anvendelse af vedvarende energi, sammenkoblede transportkorridorer og renere transportformer, hżjhastighedsbredbnd og digitale net. 
In these three sectors, CEF identifies priority investments, including electricity and gas corridors, the use of renewable energy, interconnected transport corridors and cleaner modes of transport, high-speed broadband connections, and digital networks.
CEF-E: Connecting Europe-faciliteten - Energi CEF-IKT: Connecting Europe-faciliteten - Telekommunikation CEF-T: Connecting Europe-faciliteten - Transport CHAFEA - Forvaltningsorganet for Forbrugere, Sundhed, Landbrug og Fżdevarer: Et organ oprettet af Kommissionen til p dens vegne at forvalte fire EU-programmer: sundhedsprogrammet, forbrugerprogrammet, initiativet "Bedre uddannelse - stżrre fżdevaresikkerhed" (BTSF) og programmet til fremme af landbrugsprodukter. 
CEF-ICT: Connecting Europe Facility – Telecommunications. CEF-T: Connecting Europe Facility – Transport. CHAFEA - Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency: the body set up by the European Commission to manage four EU programmes on its behalf: Health Programme; Consumer Programme; Better Training for Safer Food initiative – BTSF; Promotion of Agricultural Products Programme.
GD: Generaldirektorat. 
DG: Directorate-General.
GD CNECT - Generaldirektoratet for Kommunikationsnet, Indhold og Teknologi: Den af Kommissionens tjenestegrene, der er ansvarlig for at udvikle et digitalt indre marked med henblik p at skabe intelligent, bžredygtig og inklusiv vžkst i Europa. 
DG CNECT - Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology: the Commission department responsible for developing a digital single market to generate smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe.
GD ENER - Generaldirektoratet for Energi: Den af Kommissionens tjenestegrene, der er ansvarlig for EU's energipolitik: sikker og bžredygtig energi til konkurrencedygtige priser i Europa. 
DG ENER - Directorate-General for Energy: the Commission department responsible for the EU's energy policy: secure, sustainable, and competitively priced energy for Europe.
GD MOVE - Generaldirektoratet for Mobilitet og Transport: Den af Kommissionens tjenestegrene, der er ansvarlig for EU's politik for mobilitet og transport. 
DG MOVE - Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport: the Commission department responsible for EU policy on mobility and transport.
GD RTD - Generaldirektoratet for Forskning og Innovation: Den af Kommissionens tjenestegrene, der er ansvarlig for EU's politik for forskning, videnskab og innovation, som sigter mod at bidrage til at skabe vžkst og beskžftigelse og tackle de mest presserende samfundsmžssige udfordringer. 
DG RTD - Directorate-General for Research and Innovation: the Directorate-General for Research and Innovation is responsible for EU policy on research, science and 43 innovation, with a view to helping create growth and jobs and tackling the most pressing societal challenges.
Horisont 2020: EU's forsknings-og innovationsprogram for 2014-2020 med nžsten 80 milliarder euro i finansiering stillet til rdighed over syv r. 
H2020 - Horizon 2020: the EU’s research and innovation programme for 2014-2020, with nearly €80 billion of funding available over seven years.
INEA - Forvaltningsorganet for Innovation og Netvžrk: Efterfżlgeren til Forvaltningsorganet for det Transeuropžiske Transportnet (TEN-T EA), som i 2006 blev oprettet af Kommissionen til at forvalte den tekniske og finansielle gennemfżrelse af TEN-T-programmet. 
INEA - Innovation and Networks Executive Agency: the successor to the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency (TEN-T EA), which was created by the Commission in 2006 to manage the technical and financial implementation of the TEN-T programme.
INEA, der har hovedkontor i Bruxelles, begyndte officielt at gennemfżre dele af CEF, Horisont 2020 og resterende dele af tidligere programmer (TEN-T og Marco Polo for 2007-2013) den 1. januar 2014. 
INEA, headquartered in Brussels, officially commenced its activities of implementing parts of the CEF, H2020, and legacy programmes (TEN-T and Marco Polo 2007-2013) on 1 January 2014.
KPI: Nżgleresultatindikator. 
KPI: key performance indicator.
Midtvejsgennemgang: I 2018 foretog INEA en midtvejsgennemgang af de igangvžrende foranstaltninger fra 2014-og 2015-indkaldelserne under sit flerrige arbejdsprogram med henblik p at sikre en produktiv og effektiv anvendelse af EU-midlerne. 
MTR - mid-term review: in 2018, INEA carried out a mid-term review of ongoing actions from the 2014 and 2015 calls under its multiannual work programme, with the aim of ensuring the efficient and effective use of EU funds.
Afhžngigt af deres CEF-bidrag var foranstaltningerne genstand for enten en "omfattende gennemgang" eller en "skrivebordsgennemgang". 
Depending on their CEF contributions, the actions were subject to either a 'comprehensive' or a 'desktop' review.
Projekter af fžlles interesse: Centrale infrastrukturprojekter, navnlig gržnseoverskridende projekter, som forbinder EU-landes energisystemer. 
PCIs - Projects of common interest: key infrastructure projects, especially cross-border projects that link the energy systems of EU countries.
De er omfattet af hurtigere og mere effektive godkendelsesprocedurer og en fordelagtig reguleringsmžssig behandling (idet omkostningerne fordeles efter nettofordelene). 
They benefit from faster and more efficient permit-granting procedures and improved regulatory treatment (by allocating costs according to the net benefits).
De kan ogs stżttes under CEF. 44 
They can also be supported under the CEF. 44
REA - Forvaltningsorganet for Forskning: Et organ oprettet af Kommissionen i 2007 til at gennemfżre dele af det syvende rammeprogram for forskning og innovation (RP7). 
REA - Research Executive Agency: a body set up by the Commission in 2007 to implement parts of the 7th Framework Programme for Research & Innovation (FP7).
I 2013 blev dets ansvarsomrde udvidet til at omfatte forvaltning af en stor del af Horisont 2020. 
In 2013 its remit expanded to include managing much of Horizon 2020.
S2R - Fžllesforetagendet Shift2Rail: Et europžisk jernbaneinitiativ oprettet til at fremme fokuseret forskning og innovation samt markedsdrevne lżsninger ved at fremskynde integrering af nye og avancerede teknologier i innovative lżsninger til jernbaneprodukter. 
S2R - Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking: a European rail initiative establish to seek focused research and innovation and market-driven solutions by accelerating the integration of new and advanced technologies into innovative rail product solutions.
TEN-T - Transeuropžiske transportnet: En serie planlagte udbygninger af infrastruktur til vej-, jernbane-, luft-og vandtransport med henblik p gennemfżrelse af det transeuropžiske transportnet. TEN-T-nettene indgr i et stżrre system af transeuropžiske net, herunder et telekommunikationsnet (eTEN) og et foreslet energinet (TEN-E). 
TEN-T - Trans-European Transport Network: a set of planned road, rail, air and water infrastructure developments in implementation of the trans-European transport network policy The TEN-T networks are part of a wider system of Trans-European Networks (TENs), including a telecommunications network (eTEN) and a proposed energy network (TEN-E).
Infrastrukturudviklingen inden for TEN-T er tžt forbundet med gennemfżrelsen og videreudviklingen af EU's transportpolitik. 45 
The development of the TEN-T infrastructure is closely linked to the implementation and further advancement of EU transport policy. 45
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR P DEN EUROPŽISKE REVISIONSRETS SŽRBERETNING "INEA: ORGANISATORISKE BEGRŽNSNINGER PVIRKER FORVALTNINGEN AF CEF-PROGRAMMET" RESUM III. 
REPLIES OF THE COMMISSION TO THE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS “INEA: BENEFITS DELIVERED BUT CEF SHORTCOMINGS TO BE ADDRESSED” EXECUTIVE SUMMARY III.
Andet led: Kommissionen er af den opfattelse, at INEA's resultatindikatorer er tilstržkkelige til at mle INEA's resultater i overensstemmelse med det mandat, som det har fet fra Kommissionen. 
Second indent: The Commission believes that INEA’s performance indicators are adequate for the measurement of the performance of INEA in accordance with the mandate that it has received from the Commission.
Kommissionen mener derfor, at der bżr skelnes mellem INEA's resultatindikatorer og evalueringen af programmernes resultater. 
The Commission therefore considers that INEA’s performance indicators should be distinguished from the evaluation of the results of the programmes themselves.
INEA's resultatindikatorer indeholder oplysninger om de rlige resultater med hensyn til det budget, som er vedtaget af budgetmyndigheden (dvs. absorption af midler). 
INEA’s performance indicators provide information on the yearly results in relation to the budget voted by the Budgetary Authority (i.e. absorption of funds).
Fjerde led: I renes lżb har CEF-generaldirektoraterne żget koordineringen af deres indkaldelser med henblik p at lette INEA's arbejdsbyrde. 
Fourth indent: Over the years, the CEF DGs have increased the coordination of their calls so as to ease the work-load of INEA.
Under CEF 2 vil det fżrste flerrige arbejdsprogram omfatte tidsplanen for indkaldelserne af forslag i de tre fżrste r af programmet, deres emner og vejledende budget samt en fremtidig ramme for hele programmeringsperioden. 
Under CEF 2, the first multiannual work programme will include the timetable of the calls for proposals for the first three years of the programme, their topics and indicative budget as well as a prospective framework covering the entire programming period.
Fżrste led: CEF-generaldirektoraterne har allerede gennemget deres individuelle evaluerings-og udvžlgelsesprocedurer og er ved at forberede en fžlles tilgang med henblik p CEF 2. 
First indent: The CEF DGs have already reviewed their individual evaluation and selection procedures and are preparing a common approach in view of CEF 2.
Dette vil navnlig gennemfżre evalueringselementerne i artikel 13 i udkastet til CEF 2-forordningen i tildelingskriterierne. 
This will notably transpose the evaluation elements in article 13 of the draft CEF 2 Regulation into the award criteria.
En sdan fžlles tilgang vil ogs lette overgangen af CEF-programmet til IT-modulet eGrants. 
Such common approach will also facilitate the migration of the CEF programme towards the eGrants IT module.
De 14 CEF-T-projekter, som Revisionsretten nžvner, udgżr kun 1,9 % af de udvalgte projekter og 3 % af den samlede finansiering. 
The 14 CEF-T projects mentioned by the ECA represent only 1,9% of the selected projects and 3% of total funding.
Udvžlgelsen af projekter er som standard i overensstemmelse med eksperternes anbefaling om at bevare projekter til finansiering. 
As a norm, the selection of projects is aligned with the experts’ recommendation to retain projects for funding.
Tredje led: Kommissionen understreger, at gennemfżrelsen af EU's udgiftsprogrammer til infrastruktur navnlig indebžrer en vis risiko. 
Third indent: The Commission underlines that the implementation of EU spending programmes for infrastructure in particular carries a certain degree of risk.
Kommissionen mener, at den iboende risiko for, at CEF-programmer ikke gennemfżres fuldt ud, lżbende styres af Kommissionen og INEA. 
The Commission considers that the inherent risk that CEF programmes may not be fully implemented is being continuously managed by the Commission and INEA.
Fjerde led: Fremrykningen af budgettet for CEF-T var en klar politisk tilgang, der havde til forml at lette den żkonomiske genopretning, stżtte meget betydelige gržnseoverskridende infrastrukturprojekter, som allerede delvis var finansieret under TEN-T 2007-2013-programmet, og som kunne optimere udnyttelsen af budgettet og opfylde forpligtelsen til at sikre fuld gennemfżrelse af midlerne fra samhżrighedsfondene (11,3 mia. EUR) indtil udgangen af 2016, som var fristen for de nationale rammebelżb (artikel 11, stk. 
Fourth indent: The front-loading of the CEF-T budget was a clear policy approach aimed at facilitating the economic recovery, supporting very significant cross-border infrastructure projects partly already funded under the TEN-T 2007-2013 programe, optimising budget absorption, and meeting the commitment to provide for the full execution of the Cohesion envelope budget (€ 11.3 billion) until end 2016 which was the deadline for the national envelopes (article 11(2) of the CEF Regulation).
Femte led: En aktiv portefżljeforvaltning bżr sikre, at EU-midlerne anvendes effektivt, og dette kan om nżdvendigt omfatte forlžngelse og žndring af projekter. 
Fifth indent: Active portfolio management should ensure the effective use of EU funds and this may include, where appropriate, extensions and rescoping of projects.
V. Se Kommissionens svar til henstilling 1-5. 
V. See Commission’s replies to Recommendations 1 to 5.
BEMŽRKNINGER 29. 
OBSERVATIONS 29.
Kommissionen erkender, at koordineringen mellem forvaltningsorganer og fžllesforetagender kunne żges med henblik p at udvikle strukturerede foranstaltninger yderligere. 
The Commission acknowledges that coordination between executive agencies and joint undertakings (JU) could be increased in view of further developing structured measures.
Der gżres en indsats p dette omrde. I forbindelse med fžllesforetagendet Shift2Rail (S2R) er INEA f.eks. medlem af ERTMS Policy Board, hvor ERTMS og tekniske spżrgsml i tilknytning hertil koordineres. 
EN EN Efforts in this regard are being deployed; in relation to Shift2Rail (S2R) JU, for instance, INEA is a member of the ERTMS Policy Board, where ERTMS and related technical matters are being coordinated.
S snart resultaterne af de forskningsprojekter, som fžllesforetagendet S2R forvalter, bliver klar til ibrugtagning, og s vidt de er stżtteberettigede under CEF, vil der opst et stżrre samarbejde. 
As soon as results from research projects managed by the S2R JU become available for deployment and as far as eligible under CEF, more cooperation will emerge.
Dette er tilfžldet for lufttrafikstyring, hvor CEF gennemfżrer resultaterne af forskningsmžssige SESAR-projekter, der stżttes af SESAR-fžllesforetagendet. 
This is the case for Air Traffic Management, where CEF implements the results of research SESAR projects supported by the SESAR JU.
Desuden blev mindst t nżgleprojekt (udvalgt i forbindelse med CEF-transportindkaldelsen i 2015) stżttet af INEA og fžllesforetagendet for bržndselsceller og brint i henhold til de respektive kompetencer. 
Furthermore, at least one key project (selected during the 2015 CEF Transport call) was jointly supported by INEA and the Fuel Cell Hydrogen Joint Undertaking according to the respective competencies.
Endelig anvender INEA ogs ekspertise fra reguleringsorganer som ERA, EMSA og EASA i forbindelse med evalueringen af projektforslag. 
Finally, INEA is also using expertise from regulatory agencies like ERA, EMSA and EASA during the evaluations of project proposals.
Horisont 2020 er det stżrste program, der er blevet uddelegeret til forvaltningsorganer med hensyn til belżb og forskellige indsatsomrder. 
Horizon 2020 is the biggest programme that has been delegated to Executive Agencies in terms of amount and various strands.
Ikke blot forvaltningsorganerne, men ogs flere generaldirektorater og fžllesforetagender er ansvarlige for gennemfżrelsen af dele af Horisont 2020. 
Not only Executive Agencies but also several DGs and Joint Undertakings are responsible for implementing parts of Horizon 2020.
P tidspunktet for uddelegeringen af Horisont 2020 Energi til INEA og EASME forventedes der synergier mellem indsatsomrdet Horisont 2020 Energi i INEA og CEF Energi og mellem indsatsomrdet Horisont 2020 Energi i EASME og Horisont 2020 Đ miljż og ressourcer, LIFE og CIP-żkoinnovation. 
At the time of the delegation of Horizon 2020 Energy to INEA and EASME, synergies were rather expected between the Horizon 2020 Energy strand in INEA with CEF Energy and between the Horizon 2020 Energy strand in EASME with Horizon 2020 Envirnoment and resources, LIFE and CIP Eco-innovation.
Kommissionen ivžrksatte i september 2018 en cost-benefit-analyse der undersżger forskellige scenarier for fordelingen af fremtidige EU-programmer (eller dele af programmer), der skal uddelegeres til de forskellige forvaltningsorganer for perioden 2021-2027. 
The Commission launched in September 2018 a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) that is studying various scenarios regarding the breakdown of future EU programmes (or strands of programmes) to be delegated to the various Executive Agencies 2021-2027.
I cost-benefit-analysen vil der blive taget hensyn til en ržkke faktorer, bl.a. besparelser, at holde agenturerne p en hndterbar stżrrelse og s vidt muligt begržnse antallet af generaldirektorater, ligesom der skal vžre konsekvens i forhold til de tiltžnkte stżttemodtagere. 
The CBA will take into account several factors among which yielding savings, keeping agencies at a manageable size, limiting as far as possible the number of parent DGs and consistency in terms of targeted beneficiaries.
Kommissionen er af den opfattelse, at INEA's KPI'er er tilstržkkelige til at mle INEA's resultater i overensstemmelse med det mandat, som det har fet fra Kommissionen. 
The Commission believes that INEA’s KPIs are adequate for measuring the performance of INEA in accordance with the mandate that it has received from the Commission.
INEA's resultatindikatorer bżr derfor adskilles fra de indikatorer, som mler resultaterne af de programmer, som medlovgiverne har fastlagt inden for den retlige ramme for programmerne. 
INEA’s performance indicators should therefore be distinguished from the indicators measuring the results of the programmes themselves, set by the co-legislators in the legal framework of the programmes.
INEA's KPI'er indeholder oplysninger om de rlige resultater vedrżrende det budget, der er vedtaget af budgetmyndigheden (dvs. absorption af midler). 
INEA’s KPIs provide information on the yearly results in relation to the budget voted by the Budgetary Authority (i.e. absorption of funds).
INEA's nuvžrende sžt af nżgleresultatindikatorer blev udformet med henblik p at afspejle agenturets specifikke rolle, men svarer til de nżgleresultatindikatorer, der anvendes af de andre forvaltningsorganer. 
INEA’s current set of key performance indicators were designed to reflect the agency’s specific role but are similar to the KPIs used by the other executive agencies.
Kommissionen bemžrker imidlertid, at der er betydelige forskelle mellem de programmer, der forvaltes af forskellige forvaltningsorganer, hvilket kan forklare brugen af forskellige indikatorer. 
However, the Commission notes that there are significant differences between the programmes managed by different executive agencies that might explain use of different indicators.
Kommissionen vil ikke desto mindre vurdere mulighederne for yderligere forbedring af indikatorerne, samtidig med at det samlede antal KPI'er begržnses. 
The Commission will, nevertheless, assess the scope for further improvement of indicators while keeping the total number of KPIs limited.
Kommissionen er i żjeblikket i gang med at vurdere mulighederne for at indfżre yderligere fleksibilitetsmekanismer for personalefordeling mellem programmer i et givet forvaltningsorgan for at opn żget effektivitet i forvaltningen. 
The Commission is currently assessing the possibilities to introduce additional flexibility mechanisms for staff allocation between programmes within a given executive agency in order to reach increased efficiency in its management.
Kommissionen er imidlertid bundet af overholdelsen af de budgetprincipper, der er fastsat i finansforordningen, herunder navnlig princippet om specificering. En sdan fleksibilitet skal derfor udformes korrekt for at sikre, at dette princip overholdes. 
However, the Commission is bound by the respect of the budgetary principles set out in the Financial Regulation, and in particular the specification principle; any such flexibility will therefore need to be properly framed to ensure the respect of this principle.