natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
23 TEKSTBOKS 11 Organisation 2006 2007 A 1,71 kg/person 9,68 kg/person B 2,29 kg/person 14,44 kg/person EKSEMPLER P MŽNGDER AF PRODUKTER UDDELT PR. PERSON: Spanien: Distributionsstatistikkerne for 2007-planen viser, at der i gennemsnit blev uddelt 49,88 kg produkter pr. registeret modtager med et minimum p 28,24 kg/person i n fżdevarebank og et maksimum p 89,16 kg/person i en anden. 
23 BOX 11 Organisation 2006 2007 A 1,71 kg/person 9,68 kg/person B 2,29 kg/person 14,44 kg/person EXAMPLES OF QUANTITIES OF PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTED PER PERSON Spain: Distribution statistics for the 2007 plan show that on average 49,88 kg of products per registered recipient were distributed; with a minimum of 28,24 kg/person in one food bank and a maximum of 89,16 kg/person in another.
Italien: To organisationer, der var aktive i samme omrde, uddelte fżlgende mžngder pasta til deres stżttemodtagere: Polen: Den gennemsnitlige rlige fordeling pr. person (2006) var: 24,95 kg af n udpeget organisation 12,59 kg af en anden organisation. 
Italy: Two organisations active in the same area distributed the following quantities of pasta to their beneficiaries: Poland: The annual average distribution per person (2006) was: 24,95 kg by one designated organisation; 12,59 kg by another organisation.
En tredje organisation uddelte 6,72 kg pr. person i regionen Dolnoslaskie, mens der i regionen Lodzkie blev uddelt 78,03 kg pr. person. 
A third organisation distributed 6,72 kg per person in the region of Dolnoslaskie, while in the region of Lodzkie it distributed 78,03 kg per person.
DEN FAKTISKE GENNEMFŻRELSE AF PROGRAMMET: ANVENDES PROCEDURERNE EFTER HENSIGTEN? DER ER SVAGHEDER I DE ADMINISTRATIVE OG REGNSKABSMŽSSIGE PROCEDURER INGEN OPERATIONELLE DELML 48. 
THE PROGRAMME’S ACTUAL IMPLEMENTATION: ARE THE PROCEDURES BEING APPLIED AS INTENDED? SHORTCOMINGS IN ADMINISTRATIVE AND ACCOUNTABILITY PROCEDURES NO OPERATIONAL SUB-OBJECTIVES 48.
Medlemsstaterne og Kommissionen deler ansvaret for at sikre, at programmet er effektivt. 
Member States and the Commission share the responsibility to ensure that the programme is effective.
I artikel 27 i finansforordningen (EF, Euratom) nr. 1605/200225 fastsžttes det blandt andet, at der skal opstilles specifikke, mlelige, realiserbare, relevante og tidsbestemte mlsžtninger for alle de aktivitetsomrder, som EU-budgettet omfatter. 
Article 27 of the Financial Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/200225 provides among others that specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timely objectives shall be set for all sectors of activity covered by the EU budget.
Retten konstaterede, at de ml, der var fastsat i de gžldende fžllesskabs-forordninger, og som primžrt er overordnede ml p hżjt niveau, ikke er blevet udviklet yderligere og specificeret i anvendelige, mlelige ml eller delml. 
The Court found that the objectives stipulated by the governing Community regulations, which are essentially high-level global objectives, have not been further developed and detailed into workable, measurable targets or sub-objectives.
Mlene er s uklare, at det Ń trods retskravet26 Ń ikke er overraskende, at hverken Kommissionen eller medlemsstaterne har fastsat resultatindikatorer til at kontrollere mlopfyldelsen med27. 
Given this vagueness in the objectives, it is not surprising that, notwithstanding the legal obligation26, neither the Commission nor the Member States have set any performance indicators to monitor the achievement of objectives27.
LEDELSESOPLYSNINGER MEDDELT KOMMISSIONEN 51. 
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION COMMUNICATED TO THE COMMISSION 51.
I fžllesskabsbestemmelserne kržves det, at medlemsstaterne hvert r senest den 30. juni (n+1) tilsender Kommissionen en rapport om planens gennemfżrelse. 
Community regulations require that Member States transmit to the Commission a report on the implementation of the plan not later than 30 of June each year (n+1).
Rapporten skal indeholde vigtige oplysninger om gennemfżrelsen af planen og om kontrollen heraf28. 
It should provide important information on the implementation of the plan and its verification28.
25 EFT L 248 af 16.9.2002, s. 
25 OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p.
1605/2002 om finansforordningen skal det ved hjžlp af resultatindikatorer fastsat for hver enkelt aktivitet kontrolleres, om disse mlsžtninger er opfyldt, og de administrative tjenester, som afholder udgiften, skal fremsende oplysninger til budgetmyndigheden. Disse oplysninger, der er omhandlet i artikel 33, stk. 2, litra d), skal fremsendes snarest muligt hvert r og skal senest foreligge i de dokumenter, der ledsager de forelżbige budgetforslag. 
26 Article 27 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, Financial Regulation, provides that achievement of objectives shall be monitored by performance indicators for each activity and information shall be provided by the spending authorities to the budgetary authority. Such information, as referred to in Article 33(2)(d), shall be provided annually and at the latest in the documents accompanying the preliminary draft budget.
27 I nogle af de besżgte medlemsstater blev der udtrykt den holdning, at de sociale ml, der er fastsat i fžllesskabsforordningerne, snarere er Čfilosofiske mlÇ end reelle, mlelige ml. 
27 In some Member States visited the opinion was expressed that the social objectives set by the Community regulations are more of a ‘philosophical nature’ than real measurable objectives.
28 Rapporten skal angive de mžngder af produkter, der er overtaget fra interventionslagrene, arten, mžngden og vžrdien af de produkter, der er uddelt, og transport-og overfżrselsomkostninger og antallet af modtagere. 
28 The Report should indicate the amounts of products withdrawn from intervention stocks, the type, quantity and value of goods distributed, the transport and transfer costs and the number of recipients.
Rapporten skal ogs indeholde oplysninger om de kontrolforanstaltninger, der er truffet, formerne for og antallet af de foretagne kontroller, de opnede resultater og de tilfžlde, hvor der er plagt sanktioner. 
The report should also specify the verification measures applied and the type and number of checks carried out, the results obtained and any cases of penalties imposed.
Den skal ogs angive antallet af modtagere i det pgžldende regnskabsr (artikel 10 i forordning (EŻF) nr. 3149/92). 24 Sžrberetning nr. 
It should also include the number of recipients over the course of the year (Article 10 of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92). 24 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed
Retten gennemgik de rapporter, som medlemsstaterne havde indsendt for den reviderede periode, og konstaterede, at rapporterne i nogle tilfžlde var indsendt for sent eller ikke var fyldestgżrende. 
The Court examined the reports required to be sent by the Member States for the period under audit and found that reports are sometimes late or incomplete.
Dertil kommer, at der ikke var noget bevis for, at Kommissionen analyserer og anvender dem som foreskrevet. 
Additionally, there was no evidence that the Commission makes a proper analysis and use of them.
Revisorerne konstaterede ogs, at rapporternes data om endelige modtagere i mange tilfžlde er baseret p de velgżrende organisationers skżn og ikke p fžlles standarder eller definitioner af modtagere eller kriterier (modtagerne registreres, uden at det angives, hvor ofte eller hvilken type og mžngde mad de har modtaget)29. 
The auditors also found that the figures on final recipients provided in the report are in many cases estimations made by the charitable organisations and are not based on common standards or definitions of beneficiaries or criteria (recipients are recorded irrespectively of the frequency and the type and quantity of food received)29.
OVERSLAG OVER BUDGETBEVILLINGER OG FORDELING AF RESSOURCERNE MELLEM MEDLEMSSTATERNE 54. 
ESTIMATION OF BUDGETARY APPROPRIATIONS AND ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES BETWEEN MEMBER STATES 54.
Retten analyserede den procedure, som Kommissionen anvender til at fastsžtte de nżdvendige budgetbevillinger til gennemfżrelsen af programmet og fastlžgge fordelingen af ressourcerne mellem medlemsstaterne. 
The Court analysed the procedure used by the Commission to establish the budgetary appropriations necessary for the implementation of the programme and the allocation of resources amongst Member States.
Budgetbevillingerne fordeles til medlemsstaterne p basis af to kriterier: a) Det fżrste er de behov, som medlemsstaterne har meddelt, plus administrationsomkostninger (1 %) og transportomkostninger (4 % og 4,5 % fra 2008). b) Det andet er den befolkning, der anses for at vžre Čtruet af fattigdomÇ, i procent af den samlede befolkning i hver enkelt medlemsstat. 
The budgetary appropriations are allocated to the Member States based on two criteria: (a) the first is the needs communicated by the Member States plus the administrative costs (1 %) and the transport costs (4 % and 4,5 % from 2008); and (b) the second is the population considered ‘at risk of poverty’, as a percentage of the entire population of each Member State.
Under hensyntagen til begge kriterier tilpasses de endelige tildelinger til medlemsstaterne til de disponible budgetbevillinger. 
Taking into consideration both criteria the final allocations to the Member States are adjusted to the available budgetary appropriations.
Det andet kriterium resulterer imidlertid ikke nżdvendigvis i den mest effektive anvendelse af ressourcerne i EU som helhed. 
However, the second criterion does not necessarily result in the most effective use of the resources over the EU as a whole.
De personer, der klassificeres i denne kategori i lande med en relativt hżj indkomst, vil sandsynligvis have bedre forhold end mange mennesker, som ikke hżrer under denne kategori i lande med lav indkomst pr. indbygger. 
Those classified under this category in a relatively high income country are likely to be better off than many people falling outside the classification in countries with low income per capita.
29 I n medlemsstat fandt revisorerne ogs fejl i de velgżrende organisationers oplysninger om antallet af modtagere. 
29 In one Member State, the auditors also found errors in the number of recipients communicated by the charitable organisations.
Trods forordningens bestemmelser30 om, at der skal tages hensyn til medlemsstaternes rapporter om gennemfżrelsen af rsplanen ved fordelingen af ressourcerne mellem medlemsstaterne, fandt Retten bevis for, at det kun var sket i t tilfžlde. 
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Regulation30 that Member States’ reports on the execution of the annual plans are taken into consideration when allocating resources among the Member States, the Court found evidence that this had been done in only one case.
Endvidere tager de kriterier, der anvendes ved tildelingen af ressourcerne, ikke hensyn til elementer i befolkningen, som ikke er inkluderet i den statistiske definition, f.eks. ikke-registrerede immigranter og flygtninge. 
Additionally, the criteria used to allocate resources do not consider elements of the population not included in the statistical definition, e.g. non-registered immigrants and refugees.
De rlige behov, som medlemsstaterne meddeler Kommissionen, er normalt overslag, der er fastsat p hżjere niveau af forvaltningsmyndighederne, uden at disse nżdvendigvis har konsulteret de velgżrende organisationer. 
With regard to the annual needs notified to the Commission by the Member States, in general they are estimations fixed at the higher level of the managing bodies, without necessarily consulting the charitable organisations involved.
Det betyder, at de ressourcer, der anmodes om, ikke er baseret p reelle behov, og at de snarere er forventede mulige tildelinger. 
This means that the resources requested are not based on real needs and rather reflect anticipated possible allocations.
30 I henhold til artikel 2, stk. 1, i forordning (EŻF) nr. 3149/92 skal Kommissionen ved fordelingen af ressourcerne mellem medlemsstaterne tage hensyn til de bedste skżn over antallet af drligt stillede personer i de pgžldende medlemsstater og til erfaringerne med planens gennemfżrelse og de anvendte mžngder i de foregende regnskabsr, navnlig p basis af den rapport, der omhandles i denne forordnings artikel 10. 
30 Article 2(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 stipulates that for the purposes of allocating the resources among Member States, the Commission shall take account of the best estimates of the number of most deprived persons in the Member States concerned and of how operations were carried out and the uses to which resources were put in previous financial years, on the basis in particular of the reports provided for in Article 10 of the same Regulation.
26 TEKSTBOKS 12 r 2006 2007 2008 Antal deltagende medlemsstater 15 18 19 Anslede behov (millioner euro) 307,2 338,7 313,9 Tildelte finansielle midler (millioner euro) 259,4 258,9* 294,5** I% 84 % 76,4 % 93,8 % BEHOV FOR OG FORDELING AF RESSOURCER Behovene er udtrykt i mžngder af produkter i interventionslagre, og deres vžrdi er anslet af Kommissionen p basis af opkżbsprisen. 
26 BOX 12 Year 2006 2007 2008 Number of participating Member States 15 18 19 Estimated needs (million euro) 307,2 338,7 313,9 Allocated financial resources (million euro) 259,4 258,9* 294,5** Percentage 84 % 76,4 % 93,8 % NEEDS AND ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES The needs are expressed in quantities of products in intervention stocks and their value is estimated by the Commission using the buying-in price.
Nedenstende tabel viser de behov, som den deltagende medlemsstat har meddelt, udtrykt i belżb, og de samlede finansielle ressourcer, som Kommissionen har stillet til rdighed (inklusive administrations-og transportomkostninger). 
The table below shows the needs expressed by the participating Member States in financial terms and the total financial resources made available by the Commission (administrative and transport cost included).
Medlemsstaternes behov sammenholdt med de tildelte midler: * Oprindelig tildeling. ** Inden det i februar 2008 blev besluttet at żge tildelingen med 10 millioner euro. 
Needs of Member States compared to allocations: * Initial allocation. ** Before the increase of the allocation by 10 million euro decided in February 2008.
Retten sammenholdt de behov, som medlemsstaterne havde meddelt, med de finansielle tildelinger og analyserede ogs (jf. bilag IV) de mžngder af produkter fra interventionslagre, der var anmodet om til gennemfżrelse af planerne, og de mžngder, som Kommissionen havde tildelt. 
The Court compared the needs notified by the Member States with the financial allocations made and also analysed (see Annex IV) the quantities of products in intervention stocks requested, as needed for the implementation of the plans, and those allocated by the Commission.
De belżb, der var blevet tildelt i de seneste tre r, var lavere, end hvad der var blevet anmodet om (jf. tekstboks 12). 
The amounts allocated in the last 3 years were lower than requested (see Box 12).
Meget ofte fik medlemsstaterne hverken de produkter eller de mžngder, de havde anmodet om. 
In relation to products and quantities, the Member States very often did not obtain what they demanded.
Endvidere fik nogle medlemsstater tildelt produkter, som de ikke oprindelig havde anmodet om (f.eks. smżr og sukker i 2006 og 2007), og fik ikke tildelt de produkter, de havde anmodet om (f.eks. ris og smżr i 2007). 
In addition certain Member States were allocated products they initially did not request (e.g. butter and sugar in 2006 and 2007) and were not allocated products they did request (e.g. rice and butter in 2007).
Det sžtter spżrgsmlstegn ved, om programmet effektivt opfylder de forventede ml. 
This calls into question the effectiveness of the programme in meeting expected needs.
UDBUDSPROCEDURERNE SKAL FORBEDRES OG HARMONISERES 60. 
TENDERING PROCEDURES NEED IMPROVING AND HARMONISING 60.
De nationale myndigheder er forpligtede til at indhente tilbud med henblik p indgelse af offentlige indkżbsaftaler om de endelige produkter, der skal uddeles. 
For the procurement of the final products to be distributed, the competent national authorities are required to issue an invitation to tender.
Denne procedure anvendes for de to vigtigste typer af leveringer, der er nżdvendige til gennemfżrelse af planen: a) produkter, der er udtaget fra interventionslagre i uforandret stand eller efter emballering og/eller forarbejdning b) endelige produkter, der tilvejebringes p markedet, og som der betales for enten med produkter, der udtages fra interventionslagre (kompensationsaftale), eller med penge. 
This procedure is valid for the two main types of supplies necessary for the implementation of the plan: (a) products withdrawn from intervention stocks in unprocessed form or after packaging and/or processing; and (b) final products mobilised on the market and paid for either in the form of products withdrawn from intervention stocks (bartering) or in monetary value.
Retten analyserede de reviderede medlemsstaters procedurer for indgelse af aftaler om de endelige produkter, der leveres til velgżrende organisationer til uddeling, og gennemgik en stikprżve af udbud, som var afholdt i de seneste r, bde nr der skulle bruges produkter, der var tilgžngelige p interventionslagre, og nr der skulle foretages direkte opkżb af produkter p markedet. 27 Sžrberetning nr. 6/2009 Ń Den Europžiske Unions fżdevarehjžlp til socialt drligt stillede personer: en vurdering af mlene og de anvendte midler og metoder 
The Court analysed the procedures applied for the procurement of the final products to be supplied to charitable organisations for distribution in the Member States audited and examined a sample of tenders organised in the last years both for using products available in the intervention stocks and for direct purchase of products on the market. 27 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed
En ržkke lovkrav vedrżrende de udbudsprocedurer, der skal anvendes, er fastsat i Kommissionens forordning (EŻF) nr. 3149/92 (f.eks. den type produkter, der skal tilvejebringes p markedet, indholdet af udbuddet, begržnsninger etc.). 
Certain regulatory requirements concerning the tendering procedures to be applied are set in Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 (e.g. type of products to be mobilised on the market, content of the invitation to tender, restrictions, etc.).
I samme forordning fastsžttes det, at indhentningen af tilbud skal sikre lige adgang for alle forretningsdrivende i Fžllesskabet. 
The same Regulation requires that invitations to tender shall guarantee equal access to all operators established in the Community.
Europa-Parlamentets og Rdets direktiv 2004/18/EF31 samordner fremgangsmderne ved indgelse af offentlige vareindkżbskontrakter, offentlige tjenesteydelseskontrakter og offentlige bygge-og anlžgs-kontrakter. 
Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council31 establishes the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts.
Der gžlder endvidere specifikke fžllesskabsforordninger for salg af produkter fra interventionsorganerne32. 
In addition specific Community Regulations are in force for the sale of products held by intervention agencies32.
3730/87 eller forordning (EŻF) nr. 3149/92, som er žndret flere gange, indeholder imidlertid en pržcis henvisning til retsgrundlaget for de udbud, medlemsstaterne skal afholde. 
However, neither Regulation (EEC) No 3730/87 nor Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92, as regularly amended, make any precise reference to the legal basis for the tenders to be organised by the Member States.
Rettens revisorer konstaterede, at alle de reviderede medlemsstater afholdt udbud. 
The Court’s auditors found that tendering procedures are organised by all Member States audited.
Medlemsstaterne gennemfżrer udbudsprocedurerne i henhold til den nationale lovgivning og p betingelser, der ikke altid sikrer gennemsigtighed og lige adgang for alle forretningsdrivende i EU. 
Member States carry out the tendering procedures on the basis of the national legislation under conditions which do not always guarantee the transparency and equal access of operators at EU level.
DET ER ŻKONOMISK MERE FORDELAGTIGT AT KŻBE PRODUKTERNE P MARKEDET END AT ANVENDE INTERVENTIONSLAGRE 65. 
IT IS ECONOMICALLY MORE ADVANTAGEOUS TO BUY THE PRODUCTS ON THE MARKET THAN TO USE INTERVENTION STOCKS AS A PROXY FOR PAYMENTS 65.
Retten konstaterede, at der generelt opns mere fordelagtige priser, nr produkterne opkżbes direkte p markedet, end nr interventionslagrene anvendes som middel til betaling af de samme produkter p samme tid. 
The Court found that, in general, more advantageous prices are obtained in cases of direct purchase of products on the market, compared with using intervention stocks as a proxy for payment for the same products at the same time.
For eksempel i 2007 blev virksomheder i Polen under n og samme udbudsprocedure opfordret til at afgive deres tilbud for levering af et produkt a) i bytte for smżr fra interventionslagre og b) via direkte opkżb. 
For example, in 2007 in Poland, under the same tender procedure companies were invited to submit their bids for delivery of a product (a) in exchange for butter from intervention stocks and (b) via direct purchase.
Sammenligningen af resultaterne viser, at prisen ved direkte opkżb var ca. 10 % lavere33. 
The comparison of the results shows that the price for the direct purchase was lower by about 10 %33.
31 EUT L 134 af 30.4.2004, s. 
31 OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p.
32 F.eks. 
32 E.g.
2131/93 af 28.7.1993 om procedurer og betingelser for salg af korn fra interventionsorganerne (EFT L 191 af 31.7.1993, s. 
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93 of 28 July 1993 laying down the procedures and conditions for the sale of cereals held by intervention agencies (OJ L 191, 31.7.1993, p.
33 Forholdet for byttetransaktioner andrager 85 %, mens forholdet for direkte opkżb skżnnes at vžre 94 %. 28 Sžrberetning nr. 6/2009 Ń Den Europžiske Unions fżdevarehjžlp til socialt drligt stillede personer: en vurdering af mlene og de anvendte midler og metoder 
33 The ratio for exchange transactions reached 85 %, while the ratio for direct purchase is estimated at 94 %. 28 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed
Kommissionen har detaljerede oplysninger om markedsprisen for produkter inden for rammerne af interventionsmekanismen34. 
The Commission has detailed information on the market price of products in the context of the intervention mechanism34.
De regler, der gžlder for fżdevareprogrammet for socialt drligt stillede personer35, foreskriver imidlertid ikke, at Kommissionens kompetente tjenester informeres om de priser og betingelser, der opns ved udbudsprocedurer i medlemsstaterne. 
However, in the context of the food programme for deprived persons the governing rules35 do not foresee that the competent services of the Commission are informed about the prices and conditions achieved by the tendering procedures taking place in the Member States.
Kommissionen har derfor ikke nogen sikkerhed for, at man har opnet de mest fordelagtige betingelser. 
As a result the Commission has no assurance that the most advantageous terms have been obtained.
DER ER STOR FORSKEL P DE FORSKELLIGE UDBUDSPROCEDURER, SOM MEDLEMSSTATERNE ANVENDER 67. 
TENDER PROCEDURES APPLIED BY THE MEMBER STATES DIFFER CONSIDERABLY 67.
Retten konstaterede, at der snarere bliver anvendt nationale udbudsprocedurer end EU-procedurer med det resultat, at der er stor forskel p de procedurer, der bliver anvendt i medlemsstaterne, og selv inden for den samme medlemsstat, hvis mere end n tjeneste er ansvarlig for at afholde udbudsprocedurerne (Italien, Frankrig). 
The Court found that national rather than EU tendering procedures are applied, with the result that they differ considerably between Member States and even within the same Member State, where more than one service is responsible for organising the tenders (Italy, France).