natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Fżr indfżrelsen af det nye undersżgelsesprogram i januar 2001 mente Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret, at adskillige medlemsstater burde forbedre deres overvgningsindsats (Belgien, Danmark, Tyskland, Gržkenland, Spanien, Irland, Italien, Luxembourg, Nederlandene, Żstrig) (9). 
Before the new testing programme was introduced in January 2001, the FVO found that several Member States needed to improve their surveillance efforts (Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Austria) (9).
Den nylige stigning i antallet af BSE-tilfžlde, der er konstateret i medlemsstaterne (jf. figur 4), skyldes til dels, at den epidemiologiske overvgning er blevet udbygget og fungerer mere effektivt. 
The recent increased number of BSE cases reported by Member States (see Figure 4) is partly due to increased and better epidemio-surveillance.
Ifżlge Kommissionen ville man uden den overvgning ikke have opdaget de tilfžlde, som for nylig blev konstateret i Tyskland, Spanien og Italien. 
The Commission considers that the recent cases reported in Germany, Spain and Italy would probably not have been detected otherwise.
Ifżlge Den Videnskabelige Styringskomits (VSK) geografiske BSE-risikovurdering (10) kan der desuden komme flere BSE-tilfžlde i Belgien, Danmark, Frankrig, Irland, Luxembourg, Nederlandene og Spanien (jf. bilag 1). 
In addition, the Scientific Steering CommitteeŐs (SSC) geographical BSE risk assessment (GBR) (10) considered that more BSE cases may occur in Belgium, Denmark, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Spain (see Annex 1).
VSK begyndte i 1998 at foretage geografiske BSE-risikovurderinger af en ržkke lande. Formlet var, at fremtidige BSE-foranstaltninger skulle afspejle landenes BSE-risikostatus (11). 
The SSC started its geographical BSE risk assessment (GBR) of certain countries in 1998, with the aim that future BSE measures applied would reflect their BSE risk status (11).
Der er foretaget vurderinger af alle medlemsstater undtagen Gržkenland (12), som ikke indsendte de relevante oplysninger, og af 32 andre lande (jf. bilag 1 og punkt 10). 
The assessment has been carried out for all Member States with the exception of Greece, (12) which did not provide the relevant information, and for 32 other countries (see Annex 1) and (see paragraph 10).
1 () De godkendte diagnostiske hurtigtest Ń Prionics, Enfer og CEA Ń kan pvise BSE-agenset i slutningen af inkubationsperioden hos dyr, der allerede er klinisk syge. 
(1) Approved rapid post-mortem diagnostic tests: Prionics, Enfer, CEA are able to prove the presence of the BSE agent close to the end of the incubation period for animals that are already clinically ill.
Disse test kan ikke pvise pržkliniske tilfžlde tidligere i inkubationsperioden. 
These tests cannot identify pre-clinical cases at earlier stages of incubation.
De er godkendt til anvendelse p dyr over 30 mneder og er muligvis ikke plidelige, hvis de anven-2 des p yngre dyr. () Betragtning 4 i pržamblen til Kommissionens beslutning 2000/ 764/EFaf29.november2000omBSE-testafkvžgogomžndring afbeslutning98/272/EFomepidemiologiskovervgningforoverfżr-3 bare spongiforme encephalopatier. ()Kommissionensbeslutning98/272/EFaf23.april1998omepide-miologisk overvgning for overfżrbare spongiforme encephalopatier og om žndring af beslutning 94/474/EF (EFT L 122 af 24.4.1998, 4 s. 
They are approved for use on animals over 30 months old, and may not be 2 reliable for animals under that age. () Source: paragraph 4 of the preamble to Commission Decision 2000/ 764/EC of 29 November 2000 on the testing of bovine animals for the presence of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and amending Decision 98/272/EC on epidemio-surveillance for transmissible 3 spongiform encephalopathies. () Commission Decision 98/272/EC of 23 April 1998 on epidemio-surveillance for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and 4 amending Decision 94/474/EC (OJ L 122, 24.4.1998, p.
59). () Selvdżde dyr, der er dżde p bedriften, nżdslagtede dyr og dyr med 5 adfžrdsmžssige eller neurologiske symptomer. () Kommissionensbeslutning2000/374/EFaf5.juni2000omžndring afbeslutning98/272/EFomepidemiologiskovervgningforoverfżr-6 bare spongiforme encephalopatier (EFT L 135 af 8.6.2000, s. 
59). () ÔFallen stockŐ dying on the farm, animals presented for emergency slaughter and those showing neurological and /or behavioural symp-5 toms. () Commission Decision 2000/374/EC of 5 June 2000 amending Decision 98/272/EC on epidemio-surveillance for transmissible spongi-6 form encephalopathies (OJ L 135, 8.6.2000 p.
27). () Kommissionens beslutning 2000/764/EF af 29. november 2000 om BSE-testafkvžgogomžndringafbeslutning98/272/EFomepide-miologisk overvgning for overfżrbare spongiforme encephalopatier (EFT L 305 af 6.12.2000, s. 
27). () Commission Decision 2000/764/EC of 29 November 2000 on the testing of bovine animals for the presence of bovine spongiform encephalopathy and amending Decision 98/272/EC (OJ L 305, 6.12.2000, p.
(7) Passiv overvgning er kontrol af kreaturer, som mistžnkes for at have BSE og er registreret som sdan, fordi de har kliniske symptomer, der kan skyldes BSE. 
7 () Passive surveillance is control of notified BSE suspects i.e. cattle that are notified because of clinical signs compatible with BSE.
Aktiv overvgning er test af kreaturer, som ikke er mistžnkt og registreret, men som tilhżrer delpopulationer af hżjrisi-8 kodyr. () Tyskland: Tjenesterejse 1129/00 fra 25. september til 29. september 2000 (udkast); Italien: Tjenesterejse 1306/00 fra 11. december 2000 til 15. december 2000 (udkast); Spanien: Tjenesterejse 1305/00 fra 9 11. december 2000 til 15. december 2000 (udkast). ()Levnedsmiddel-ogVeterinžrkontoretsdokumentref.D33459af 10 8. november 2000. ()VSKŐsendeligeudtalelseaf6.juli2000omdegeografiskeBSE-11 risikovurderinger, bilag II, afsnit 3, lande, som i dag er p niveau III. () Til dato (april 2001) har Kommissionen henvist til de geografiske BSE-risikovurderinger i forbindelse med import fra tredjelande og godkendelse af specifikke testningsprogrammer for Żstrig, Sverige og Finland samt i sit forslag til en TSE-forordning, hvori der gives mulighed for at differentiere BSE-kontrolforanstaltningerne fra medlemsstat 12 til medlemsstat. () De geografiske BSE-risikovurderinger er blevet foretaget p grundlag af oplysninger indsendt af medlemsstaterne efter Kommissionens henstilling98/447/EFaf22.juli1998.Degržskemyndighederervil-lige til at indsende disse oplysninger, nr Rdets og Parlamentets forordning om identificering og kontrol af TSEŐer er vedtaget. 
Active surveillance is testing of cattle that are not notified as BSE suspects but 8 belong to risk sub-populations. () Source: Germany: DRAFT mission 1129/00 between 25 September 2000 and 29 September 2000; Italy: DRAFT mission 1306/00 between 11 December 2000 and 15 December 2000; Spain: DRAFT mission 9 1305/00 between 11 December 2000 and 15 December 2000. ( ) Source: FVO document reference D33459 of 8 November 2000.
C 324/12 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 20.11.2001 BSE-overvgning Utilstržkkelig BSE-overvgning med betydelig risiko for, at tilfžlde ikke konstateres Utilstržkkelig BSE-overvgning eller utilstržkkeligt undersżgelsesprogram Utilstržkkelig uddannelse af overvgningspersonale Forbud mod kżd-og benmel i foder Betydelig risiko for kontaminering af kvžgfoder med kżd-og benmel fra pattedyr Utilstržkkelig kontrol af handel med kżd-og benmel Foder med kżd-og benmel ikke mžrket korrekt Utilstržkkelig undersżgelse af kvžgfoder Utilstržkkelig officiel inspektion af dyrefoder Udsmeltningsstandarder Utilstržkkelig administrativ kontrol af udsmeltning Utilstržkkelige udsmeltningsstandarder Specificeret risikomateriale Utilstržkkelig gennemfżrelse af beslutning 2000/418/EF Belgien Danmark Tyskland Gržkenland Spanien Frankrig Irland Italien Luxembourg Nederlandene Żstrig Portugal Finland Sverige Det Forenede Kongerige Bemžrk: Svaghederne markeret med rżdt er sžrlig alvorlige, fordi de indebžrer, at forekomsten af BSE er hżjere end konstateret, og at kvžg kan vžre blevet fodret med kżd-og benmel fra pattedyr. 
C 324/12 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20.11.2001 BSE surveillance Indadequate surveillance of BSE with significant risk of under-reporting Inadequate BSE monitoring or testing programme Inadequate training of surveillance staff Meat and bonemeal (MBM) feed ban Significant risk of contamination of ruminant feed by MMBM Inadequate controls over trade in MBM Feedstuffs containing MBM were not correctly labelled as such Inadequate testing of ruminant feed Inadequate official inspections of animal feed Rendering standards Inadequate administrative controls over rendering Inadequate rendering processing standards Specified risk materials Inadequate implementation of Decision 2000/418/EC Belgium Denmark Germany Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Austria Portugal Finland Sweden United Kingdom NB: The weaknesses in red are particularly serious, as they indicate that the incidence of BSE is higher than reported, and that cattle could have been fed with mammalian MBM.
Kilde: Revisionsrettens gennemgang af Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontorets inspektionsrapporter, 1998-2000. 
Source: Court of Auditors review of FVO inspection reports, 1998-2000.
Figur 6 Oversigt over de vžsentligste svagheder konstateret af Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret fra 1998 til 2000 
Figure 6 Summary of main weaknesses identified by the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) between 1998 and 2000
20.11.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 324/13 Specificeret risikomateriale (SRM) 24. 
20.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 324/13 Specified risk materials (SRMs) 24.
VSK ans, at der var forskellige grader af smittefare forbundet med forskellige vžvstyper, men at det var uklogt at udtale sig kategorisk om, hvorvidt BSE-agenset fandtes eller ikke fandtes i bestemte vžv i et inficeret dyr (1). 
The SSC considered that tissues had different grades of infectiveness but that it was unwise to consider the BSE agent as present or absent in any particular tissue of an infected animal (1).
Eftersom der er stżrre sandsynlighed for at finde BSE-agenset i nogle vžvstyper end i andre (isžr hjernevžv og centralnervevžv), er det vigtigt at holde disse vžvstyper ude af fżde-og foderkžden, og at der anvendes hensigtsmžssige slagtemetoder, s kżd ikke inficeres. 
As some tissues are more likely to harbour the infective BSE agent than others (in particular, the brain and central nervous tissue), it is important to ensure that these tissues stay out of the human food and animal feed chain, and that appropriate slaughter procedures are used to prevent the contamination of meat.
Det har taget lang tid at vedtage og gennemfżre Kommissionens forslag om at fjerne dette specificerede risikomateriale (SRM) fra fżde-og foderkžden (jf. bilag 3). 
The CommissionŐs proposals to remove these specified risk materials (SRMs) from the food and feed chains have taken a long time to be adopted and implemented (see Annex 3).
Det fżrste forslag til medlemsstaterne om at indfżre kontrol i hele EU for at f fjernet bestemte typer SRM-vžv blev afvist af Rdet i december 1996. 
Its first proposal to the Member States to introduce EU wide controls to remove certain SRM tissues was rejected by the Council in December 1996.
I juli 1997 blev forslaget p ny forelagt for medlemsstaterne, og da det ikke blev afvist i Rdet med simpelt flertal, vedtog Kommissionen en beslutning om at fjerne og udelukke SRM fra videre forarbejdning (2). 
These were proposed again to the Member States in July 1997, and in the absence of a simple majority rejecting the proposal in Council, the Commission took a decision on the removal and exclusion of SRMs from further processing (2).
Beslutningen skulle have vžret gennemfżrt i alle medlemsstater med virkning fra 1. januar 1998, men gennemfżrelsen blev udsat fire gange, indtil beslutningen i juni 2000 blev ophžvet og erstattet med en anden (3). 
The Decision was to have been implemented in all Member States from 1 January 1998, but was postponed four times until June 2000, when it was repealed and replaced (3).
P EU-niveau herskede der ikke enighed om, hvad der skulle betegnes som SRM (4). 
There was no common agreement on what constituted SRMs at the EU level (4).
Fra det fżrste forslag om fžlles EU-regler vedrżrende SRM blev fremsat p opfordring af Den Videnskabelige Veterinžrkomit, gik der nžsten fire r, fżr Kommissionens forslag om at fjerne SRM blev accepteret. 
Acceptance of the CommissionŐs proposals to remove SRMs took almost four years after EU-wide rules on SRMs were first proposed following the advice of the Scientific Committee.
Lovgivningsproceduren giver utilfredsstillende lange forsinkelser, nr medlemsstaterne ikke accepterer Kommissionens forslag, og der er behov for hurtige beslutninger. 
The legislative procedure results in inappropriate delays where Member States do not accept the CommissionŐs proposals, and timely action is required.
Det bżr overvejes, om Kommissionen skal have specifikke befżjelser, som kan anvendes i sdanne nżdsituationer. 
Consideration needs to be given to whether the Commission should have specific additional emergency powers in such situations.
Udsmeltningsmetoder og regler for dyrefoder 28. 
Rendering methods and regulation of animal feed 28.
Udsmeltning af SRM i overensstemmelse med de anerkendte normer (5) reducerer smittefaren vžsentligt, men udrydder ikke det infektiżse BSE-agens (jf. punkt 24). 
Rendering in accordance with approved standards (5) significantly reduces infectiveness but does not eradicate the infective BSE agent found in SRMs (see paragraph 24).
Kommissionen har i en ržkke beslutninger fastsat, hvilke udsmeltningsmetoder der skal anvendes for at reducere BSE-smittefaren i inficeret animalsk affald, som forarbejdes til kżd-og benmel og anvendes i foder til husdyr (6), og den har fastlagt procedurer for kontrol og godkendelse af udsmeltningsanlžg og foderproducenter. 
Commission decisions set out the rendering methods to be used in order to reduce BSE infectiveness from infected animal waste processed into MBM for use in feed for farmed animals (6), and on the inspection and authorisation of rendering plants and animal feed producers.
Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret har under sine inspektioner konstateret problemer i de fleste medlemsstater (7). Det har taget meget lang tid at f omsat fžllesskabsreglerne til national lov, og der har vžret problemer med procedurerne for godkendelse af udsmeltningsanlžg og med kontrollen af, at de foreskrevne forarbejdningsnormer overholdes (jf. figur 6 og bilag 2). 
FVO inspections have identified problems in most Member States (7) with late transposition of the Community rules into national rules, as well as approval procedures for rendering plants and ensuring that the relevant processing standards have been applied (see Figure 6 and Annex 2).
Sžrlig i de medlemsstater, hvor der ikke var indfżrt et nationalt forbud mod anvendelse af kżd-og benmel (4), er det usandsynligt, at BSE-agenset blev udryddet ved udsmeltning. 
Particularly in those Member States in which there was no national SRM ban (4), rendering is unlikely to have eliminated the BSE infective agent.
Myndighederne i Det Forenede Kongerige forbżd i 1988 anvendelse af kżd-og benmel fra drżvtyggere i foder til 1 ( ) VSKŐs udtalelse om sikkerhed og specificeret risikomateriale (decem-(5) Mindstenormerne for forarbejdning af animalsk affald fra pattedyr: partikelstżrrelse hżjst 50 mm; temperatur mindst 133 ĄC i 20 minut-6 ter uden afbrydelse ved et tryk p mindst 3 bar. () Kommissionensbeslutning94/382/EFaf27.juni1994omgodken-delse af alternative varmebehandlingssystemer til forarbejdning af animalsk affald fra drżvtyggere (EFT L 172 af 7.7.1994, s. 
The United Kingdom authorities have prohibited feeding ruminant-derived MBM to ruminants since 1988, and (5) 6 () 7 () The minimum standards for processing mammalian animal waste are: maximum particle size of 50 mm; temperature of at least 133 ĄC, for 20 minutes without interruption, at a pressure of at least 3 bar.
25); Kom-missionensbeslutning95/29/EFaf13.februar1995omžndringaf beslutning94/382/EF(EFTL38af18.2.1995,s.17);Kommissionens beslutning96/449/EFaf18.juli1996(EFTL184af24.7.1996,s.43); Kommissionensbeslutning97/735/EFaf21.oktober1997omvisse beskyttelsesforanstaltningermedhensyntilhandelmedbestemte typer af animalsk affald fra pattedyr (EFT L 294 af 28.10.1997, s. 
25); Commission Decision 95/29/EC of 13 February 1995 amending Decision 94/382/EC (OJ L 38, 18.2.1995, p. 17); Commission Decision 96/449/EC of 18 July 1996 (OJ L 184, 24.7.1996, p. 43); Commission Decision 97/735/EC of 21 October 1997 concerning certain protection measures with regard to trade in certain types of mammalian animal waste (OJ L 294, 28.10.1997, p.
7); Rdets beslutning 1999/534/EF af 19. juli 1999 om foranstaltninger for forarbejdning af visse former for animalsk affald med henblik p beskyttelse mod overfżrbare spongiforme encephalopatier og om žndring af Kommissionens beslutning 97/735/EF (EFT L 204 af 7 4.8.1999, s. 
7); Council Decision 1999/534/EC of 19 July 1999 on measures applying to the processing of certain animal waste to protect against transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and amending Commission Decision 97/735/EC (OJ L 204, 4.8.1999, p.
37). () Belgien, Danmark, Tyskland, Gržkenland, Spanien, Frankrig, Italien, Żstrig, Portugal, Finland, Sverige og Det Forenede Kongerige. ber 1997). ( ) Kommissionens beslutning 97/534/EF af 30. juli 1997 om forbud modanvendelseafrisikomaterialemedhensyntiloverfżrbarespon-3 giforme encephalopatier (EFT L 216 af 8.8.1997, s. 
37). Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Portugal, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
2 1). 
C 324/14 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20.11.2001 seven Member States also introduced similar feed bans soon after the United Kingdom (1).
2 
The EU-wide ban on feeding proteins derived from mammalian tissues to ruminants was introduced in 1994 (2).
P grund af den forholdsvis hżje forekomst af BSE forbżd myndighederne i Det Forenede Kongerige i 1996 anvendelse af kżd-og benmel fra pattedyr i alt husdyrfoder for at undg krydskontaminering (3), og Portugal indfżrte et tilsvarende forbud i 1998. 
Given their relatively high incidence of BSE and in order to avoid cross contamination, the United Kingdom authorities banned mammalian MBM from all feed for farmed animals in 1996 (3), and Portugal introduced a similar ban in 1998.
I resten af EU var det stadig tilladt at anvende kżd-og benmel fra pattedyr i foder til andre husdyr (4), s lžnge mindstenormerne for forarbejdning blev overholdt (jf. punkt 28). 
In the rest of the EU, mammalian MBM continued to be allowed for use in feed for other farm animals (4), as long as minimum processing standards were in place (see paragraph 28).
Den internationale videnskabelige konference om kżd-og benmel i 1997 overvejede, om der var behov for EU-lovgivning til at sikre, at der opsżges sikkert rmateriale til kżd-og benmel, (dvs. at dyr, som er dżde p bedriften eller under transport, samt alt kasseret materiale udelukkes fra foderkžden, s kun materiale, som er erklžret egnet til menneskefżde, kan anvendes til fremstilling af foder). 
The International Scientific Conference on MBM in 1997 considered whether there was a need for EU legislation to ensure that the raw materials for MBM are safely sourced, (i.e. to exclude animals dying on farm or in transit and all condemned materials from the animal feed chain, so that only material declared fit for human consumption could be used for the production of animal feed).
Lovgivningen om at fjerne dyrevžv, som kan udgżre en BSE-risiko, fra fżde-og foderkžden trdte fżrst i kraft i oktober 2000 (5); lovgivningen om at fjerne dyr, som er dżde p bedriften eller under transport, samt alle dżde dyr fra foderkžden trdte i kraft i marts 2001 (6). 
Relevant legislation to remove animal tissues which could present a BSE risk from the food and feed chains did not enter into force until October 2000 (5); legislation to remove animals dying on farm or in transit and all cadavers from the animal feed chain entered into force in March 2001 (6).
1996-krisen i Det Forenede Kongerige viste, at gennemfżrelsen at foderforbuddet fra 1988 ikke var blevet hndhžvet strengt nok. Det resulterede i 36 000 (konstaterede) tilfžlde af BSE hos dyr fżdt efter indfżrelsen af forbuddet (da sžrberetning nr. 
The 1996 crisis in the United Kingdom showed that the inadequate implementation of the 1988 feed ban resulted in 36 000 (reported) BSE cases in animals born after the United Kingdom ban (by the time of Special Report No 19/98).
Alle de medlemsstater, som har konstateret tilfžlde af BSE, undtagen Luxembourg, har konstateret BSE hos dyr fżdt efter EU-forbuddet fra 1994. 
All Member States having reported BSE cases except Luxembourg have now reported cases in animals born after the EU ban of 1994.
Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret har i forbindelse med sine inspektioner gentagne gange rapporteret, at foderforbuddet ikke er blevet hndhžvet strengt nok Ń det gžlder samtlige medlemsstater (jf. figur 6 og bilag 2). 
FVO inspections have repeatedly reported on inadequate implementation of the feed ban in all Member States (see Figure 6 and Annex 2).
Selv under inspektionerne foretaget mellem 1998 og 2000, op til seks r efter indfżrelsen af for-buddet, konstaterede Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret, at risikoen for kontaminering af foder til drżvtyggere med kżd-og benmel fra pattedyr var meget stor i ni medlemsstater (7). 
Even in its inspections between 1998 and 2000, up to six years after the ban was first introduced the FVO found that there was a significant risk of contamination of ruminant feed by mammalian MBM in nine Member States (7).
Hertil kommer, at en vis grad af kontaminering blev tolereret af de fleste medlemsstater (ikke Danmark, Nederlandene og Irland), selv om fžllesskabslovgivningen ikke tillader en sdan tolerance (8). 
In addition, a certain level of contamination was tolerated by most Member States (except Denmark, Netherlands and Ireland) despite the fact that Community legislation does not allow any such tolerance (8).
Under Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontorets inspektioner i 1998-2000 blev der i de fleste medlemsstater ogs konstateret svagheder i kontrollen af handelen med kżd-og benmel (jf. figur 6). 
The FVO inspections in 1998 to 2000 also found weaknesses in the control of trade in MBM in most Member States (see Figure 6).
P grund af bekymring for krydskontaminering og p anbefaling af VSK (9) forbżd Rdet i december 2000 midlertidigt anvendelse af animalske proteiner i foder til alle husdyr (10). 
In December 2000, due to concerns about cross contamination and following the opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee (9), the Council temporarily banned the use of animal proteins in feed for all farmed animals (10).
P baggrund af udviklingen i Det Forenede Kongerige erkendte Kommissionen, at der var en risiko for krydskontaminering i foderstoffabrikker, dels fordi man ikke i alle medlemsstater systematisk fjernede SRM, dels fordi det animalske affald, som blev anvendt til fremstilling af kżd-og benmel, ikke blev kontrolleret godt nok, og endelig fordi forbuddet mod anvendelse af kżd-og benmel, som udelukkende gjaldt foder til drżvtyggere, ikke kunne hndhžves effektivt. 
Following the United Kingdom experience, the Commission was aware of the risk of cross-contamination in feed mills, knowing that SRMs were not being systematically removed in all the Member States, that animal waste used for producing MBM was not safely sourced and that the MBM ban on ruminants only would not be foolproof.
I fžllesskabslovgivningen er der fastsat mind-stenormer for foderstoffabrikker. 
Community legislation deals with the minimum standards for feed mills.
Men der stilles ikke krav om etablering af sžrlige fabrikker til fremstilling af foder til drżvtyggere, selv om det ville have reduceret risikoen for krydskontaminering vžsentligt. 
However, there is no EU obligation to impose dedicated feed mills, which would have greatly reduced risks of cross-contamination.