natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
18 Kommissionen er i gang med at se p forvaltningen af ITF og de begržnsninger, som Revisionsretten peger p, ssom restriktionerne for regionale programmer (f.eks. bning over for nationale programmer, samme stemmerettigheder for forskellige sektorer, forvaltning varetaget af Kommissionen). 
18 The Commission is addressing the governance of ITF and the limitation identified by the Court such as the restrictions to regional programmes (e.g. opening to national programmes, different sectors‐same voting rights, management by the Commission).
20 Identifikationen af projekter er resultatet af samspil og drżftelser mellem forskellige parter, herunder partnerlandene eller relevante regionale organisationer, Kommissionen og EU-delegationerne, andre donorer, de finansielle institutioner og i visse tilfžlde repržsentanter for den private sektor og civilsamfundet. 
20 The identification of projects is a result of interac‐ tions and discussions between different stakehold‐ ers, including the partner countries or relevant regional organisations, the Commission and EU delegations, other donors, the financial institutions and in some cases, private sector as well as civil society representatives.
Identifikationen af projekter bygger p programmeringsprocessen og p de politiske prioriteter, som er godkendt af Kommissionen, EU-Udenrigstjenesten og partnerlandene. 
The identification of projects builds on the pro‐ gramming process and on the approved policy pri‐ orities by the Commission, EEAS and partner coun‐ tries.
Identifikationen af projekter bygger desuden p de strategiske drżftelser, som afholdes inden for hver enkelt blandingsfacilitet inden for rammerne af strategirdet/styringskomi-ten, og p drżftelserne om analysen af portefżljen af godkendte projekter og projektpipelinen. 
The identification of projects further builds on the strategic discussions held within each blending facility in the context of the strategic board/steer‐ ing committee and on the discussions held on the analysis of the portfolio of approved projects and on the pipeline of projects.
Kommissionens svar 38 Systematisk at Čtage initiativetÇ er ikke et operationelt ml i sig selv for Kommissionen. 
Reply of the Commission 38 Being systematically ‘at the initiative’ is not an operational objective in itself for the Commission.
Kommissionen bestržber sig snarere p at skabe stżrst mulig effektivitet og arbejdsdeling under identifi-kationsprocessen og p at bygge p alle parternes operationelt stžrke sider. 
The Commission rather strives to maximise effi‐ ciency and division of labour in the identification process and build on all stakeholders operationals strengths.
Dette vil blive yderligere strżmlinet gennem reformen af blanding, som er i godkendelsesfasen. 
This will be further streamlined by the reform of the blending in its approval phase.
21 Kommissionen har planer om at revidere den mde, hvorp faciliteterne for den afrikanske region er opbygget. 
21 The Commission envisages reviewing the set‐up of the facilities for the Africa region.
Se Kommissionens svar p punkt 18. 
Please see Com‐ mission’s reply to paragraph 18.
Fžlles svar fra Kommissionen p punkt 22-31 22 P grund af faciliteternes fleksibilitet og store sektordžkning er processen med fastsžttelse af en fžlles indikator for mervžrdi for alle projekter nżdvendigvis kompleks og nžsten umulig. 
Common reply to paragraphs 22 to 31 22 Due to the flexible nature and extensive sector cov‐ erage of the facilities, the process for establishing a common indicator for value added for all the pro‐ jects is necessarily complex and almost impossible.
Tilskuddets mervžrdi vurderes altid, og denne vurdering er blevet styrket i tidens lżb, navnlig i forbindelse med det arbejde, som EU-platformen har udfżrt. 
Added value of the grant is always assessed and this assessment has been strengthened over time, in particular, in the context of the work undertaken by the EU Platform.
23 Kommissionen mener, at den rdede over de relevante oplysninger, som var nżdvendige i de forskellige faser af godkendelsen (forelżbig og endelig). 
23 The Commission considers that relevant data required at different stages of approval (provisional and final) were at the disposal of the Commission.
Disse oplysninger vurderes imidlertid ved den endelige godkendelse. 
However, at a final approval stage this information is assessed.
Desuden kan visse lnebetingelser žndre sig mellem ansżgningen og den endelige godkendelse p grund af żkonomiske svingninger. 
Additionally, certain loan conditions might change between the request and the final approval due to economic fluctuations.
De finansielle institutioner kan derfor afslutte forhandlingerne om de pržcise betingelser for deres ln (rentesats, lżbetid osv.), efter at bestyrelsen for faciliteten har givet sin godkendelse. 
Therefore, the FIs can finalise negotiations regarding the exact conditions of their loan (interest rate, tenor years, etc.) after the Facility Board’s approval.
Det er de finansielle institutioners ansvar at foretage de nżdvendige beregninger i overensstemmelse med internationale standarder, princippet om rettidig omhu og de godkendte metoder inden for rammerne af partnerskab og en effektiv arbejdsdeling. 
It is the responsibility of the financiers to carry out the necessary calculations according to interna‐ tional standards, the principle of due diligence and agreed methods in a context of partnership and efficient division of labour.
De finansielle institutioners specialiserede teams foretager en tilbundsgende projektvurdering i overensstemmelse med principperne om rettidig omhu. 
In‐depth project appraisal is made by specialised teams of the FIs in accordance with the principles of due diligence.
De tilgrundliggende undersżgelser foretages isžr af den ledende europžiske finansielle institution og er til rdighed, nr der er bekymring over projekternes egnethed, eller nr der anmodes om yderligere oplysninger ud over de oplysninger, som indgr i ansżgningen. 
The underlying studies are primarily carried out by the lead European Financier and are available whenever there are concerns regarding the suitabil‐ ity of the projects or whenever additional informa‐ tion is requested over and above the information contained in the application.
Kommissionen mener ikke, at det er nżdvendigt, at de finansielle institutioner systematisk fremlžgger undersżgelserne, da det i de fleste tilfžlde blot vil żge den administrative byrde uden at give en reel mervžrdi. 
The Commission does not consider it necessary for financiers to provide the studies in a systematic way as this will only increase the administrative burden without real added value in most of the cases.
24 Kommissionen vil gerne understrege, at EUŐs bidrag fżrst er blevet godkendt, nr de nżdvendige oplysninger, som viser, at de vžsentligste krav i de strategiske retningslinjer er overholdt, foreligger. 
24 The Commission underlines that EU contributions have been approved only when the necessary information underlying compliance with the main requirements set out in the Strategic Orientations has been obtained.
Alle de oplysninger, som er nżdvendige for, at der kan tržffes en beslutning, er blevet fremlagt og medtaget i beslutningstagningsprocessen. 
All the information needed for taking a decision has been produced and factored in the decision‐making process.
Kommissionen kan ifżlge finansforordningen i forbindelse med indirekte forvaltning benytte sig af det arbejde, som allerede er blevet udfżrt af den bemyndigede enhed i overensstemmelse med principperne om rettidig omhu og arbejdsdeling, som har en central plads i vores partnerskab med de finansielle institutioner. 
In accordance with the Financial Regula‐ tion and in the context of indirect management, the Commission can rely on the work already done by the entrusted entity, in line with the principles of due diligence and division of labour at the core of our partnership with the financial institutions.
Det er kun tilstržkkeligt modne projekter, der kan godkendes. 
Only sufficiently mature projects are considered for approval.
Der er stadig mulighed for senere at gennemfżre feasibilityundersżgelser for at styrke projektets struktur yderligere i overensstemmelse med tilskudsmodtagernes behov, sledes at projektets kvalitet żges. 
Subsequent feasibility studies aimed at further strengthening project set‐up in line with beneficiaries’ needs can still be done, thereby enhancing the quality of the project.
Kommissionens svar 39 Tekstboks 2 Som anfżrt i referatet af det 9. mżde i ITFŐs forretningsudvalg fik medlemmerne yderligere oplysninger om dette projekt efter at have anmodet om det. 
Box 2 As recorded in the minutes of the 9th ITF Executive Committee meeting, additional information on this project was provided to its members upon prior request.
Projektet blev godkendt i 2009. 
This project was approved in 2009.
Siden da er ansżgningsformularen blevet forbedret betydeligt for at supplere de oplysninger, som de finansielle institutioner giver. 
Since then, the grant application form has considerably improved in order to complement the information provided by the financial institutions.
25 Alle de projekter, der finansieres via faciliteterne, analyseres bde ud fra et żkonomisk perspektiv og med hensyn til gžldsbžredygtighed. 
25 All projects financed under the facilities are ana‐ lysed both from an economic and debt sustainabil‐ ity perspective.
Et af Kommissionens og de finansielle institutioners vigtigste ml er at sikre den ptžnkte investering og dens levedygtighed og udviklingsmžssige virkninger p lžngere sigt. 
One of the main objectives of the Commission and of the financiers is to preserve the envisaged investment and its long term sustainabil‐ ity and development impact.
Men der kan ikke fastsžttes ensartede kriterier, ssom mindstegržnser, for vurdering af den żkonomiske levedygtighed. 
Still, uniform criteria, such as minimum thresholds, cannot be established for assessing economic viability.
Arbejdsgruppen for stżttead-ditionalitet i forbindelse med blandingsmekanismer konkluderede i 2009, at selve blandingsoperationer-nes egenart kržver, at man ser p hver enkelt sag, nr man skal vurdere stżrrelsen, formen og arten af den nżdvendige stżtte. 
The Working Group on the additionality of grants in the framework of blending mecha‐ nisms concluded in 2009 that the very nature of the blending operations calls for a case by case approach in terms of assessment of the amount, form and nature of support needed.
Denne tilgang er for nylig blevet bekržftet i forbindelse med det arbejde, som EU-platformen for blanding i eksternt samarbejde har udfżrt. 
This approach has been confirmed in the context of the more recent work of the EU Platform for Blending in External Cooperation (EUBEC).
Projekternes interne żkonomiske afkast vurderes altid som led i rettidig omhu. 
The EIRR (Economic Internal Rate of Return) for projects is always assessed as part of due diligence.
Beslutningerne om tildeling af tilskud foretages p grundlag af den żkonomiske og finansielle analyse af projekterne og de forventede sociale fordele (overkommelige priser, indvirkninger p sundheden, den sociale situation). 
Grant allocation decisions are made based on the economic and financial analysis of the projects, as well as the expected social benefits (affordability, impact on health, social situation).
Denne gennemgang er baseret p de oplysninger, som er givet i ansżgningsskemaet, og yderligere oplysninger, som stammer fra kontakter mellem forskellige tjenestegrene i Kommissionen og dens delegationer, de finansielle institutioner og alle relevante parter fżr, under og efter de tekniske mżder. 
This review is based on the information provided in the grant application form, as well as additional information stemming from exchanges between different Commission services and its delegations, the FI and any relevant stakeholder, before, during and after the technical meetings.
Beviset for, at procedurens lžngde er passende og rimelig, er, at der hidtil ikke har vžret noget, der har tydet p, at relevante projekter ikke blev gennemfżrt p grund af forsinkelser i godkendelsesproceduren. 
Reply of the Commission 40 The proof that the length of the procedure is appropriate and reasonable is that there has been no evidence so far that any relevant project was not implemented due to delays in the approval pro‐ cedure.
Tvžrtimod er godkendelsesprocessen tilstržkkeligt fleksibel til, at der kan tages hensyn til partnernes behov, sledes at processen om nżdvendigt kan fremskyndes. 
On the contrary, the approval process has sufficient flexibility to take into account the need of partners allowing speeding up the process, if necessary.
29 Kommissionen vil gerne pržcisere, at det i lyset af problemer i forbindelse med de enkelte projekter mske nok er nżdvendigt, men ikke tilstržkkeligt, at n op p IMFŐs subventionsniveau. 
29 The Commission would like to clarify that achiev‐ ing IMF concessionality levels may be necessary, but not sufficient, in the light of project‐specific issues.
Overholdelsen af gržnsen p 35 % kan betragtes som en fżrste nżdvendig forudsžtning for, at finansieringspakken kan accepteres af en tilskudsmodtager, som er underlagt IMF-begržnsninger. 
Meeting the 35 % threshold can be consid‐ ered a first, necessary precondition for the financ‐ ing package to be accepted by a beneficiary under IMF restrictions.
Det er imidlertid ikke automatisk en tilstržkkelig betingelse i sig selv. 
However, it is not automatically sufficient condition in itself.
Visse projekter kržver et stżrre element af gavebistand i finansieringspakken end 35 %, uden at der sžttes spżrgsmlstegn ved den vžsentlige udvik-lingseffekt, de har. 
Certain projects might require a higher grant element of the financing package than 35 % without putting into doubt the significant development impact they provide.
30 Begrundelsen for de tilskudsbelżb, som der anmodes om, kan variere betydeligt alt efter den specifikke markedshindring, det drejer sig om, overkommelige priser for mlgruppen, projektets modenhed, de lokale markedsvilkr, muligheden for at skaffe midler fra andre finansieringskilder, projektledernes kapacitet og risikovillighed og andre betingelser. 
30 The justification for grant amounts requested can vary considerably according to the specific market barrier being addressed, target group affordability, project maturity, local market conditions, availabil‐ ity of funds from other financiers and the capac‐ ity and risk appetite of the project implementers, among other conditions.
Denne variation gżr det sammen med manglen p plidelige markedsoplysninger i partnerlandene til noget af en udfordring at udstikke kriterier for fastsžttelsen af tilskudsbelżb, der omfatter alle tžnkelige interventioner i alle tžnkelige dynamiske markedssammenhžnge. 
This variance, coupled with the dearth of reliable market information in partner countries, makes it challenging to establish criteria for setting the amounts of grants cover‐ ing every possible intervention in every possible dynamic market context.
I sidste ende er Kommissionen i et vist omfang afhžngig af de finansielle partnerinstitutioners evne til at forhandle sig til den bedste aftale, dvs. det mindste mulige tilskudsbelżb, for at katalysere et bestemt projekt. 
Ultimately the Commis‐ sion has to rely to some extent on the ability of partner finance institutions to negotiate the best deal, i.e. the minimum grant amount, to catalyse a specific project.
Der er ikke nogen brugbare alternativer til denne prisfastsžttelsesproces for visse projekter. 
There are no viable alternatives to this ‘pricing’ process for some projects.
For eksempel bestemmes stżrrelsen af en Čfirst lossÇ-garanti i forbindelse med ln til sm og mellemstore virksomheder som regel ikke af tidligere erfaringer (hvis sdanne findes), men snarere af lngivernes oplevede risiko Ń et subjektivt parameter, som kun kan fastlžgges gennem effektiv forhandling. 
For exam‐ ple, the size of a first loss guarantee for lending to SMEs is not generally determined by historical experience (if there is any) but rather by the lenders’ perceived risk — a subjective parameter that can only be determined through skilled negotiation.
Kommissionens svar 41 Tekstboks 3 Kommissionen overholdt de gžldende regler og bestemmelser fuldt ud. 
Reply of the Commission 41 Box 3 The Commission proceeded in full compliance with the applicable rules and regulations.
Den udbetaling, som omtales i tekstboks 3, blev foretaget i 2010. 
The disbursement arrangement explained in Box 3 was done in 2010.
For NIF žndrede Kommissionen denne udbetalingspolitik i 2012 (jf. punkt 32). 
For the NIF, the Commission has changed this disbursement policy in 2012. (cf. para‐ graph 32).
Desuden skal der ved vurderingen af dette NIF-projekt tages hensyn til de usždvanlige forhold og de begivenheder, som fandt sted i partnerlandet fra januar 2011, og som har pvirket gennemfżrelsen af projektet. 
In addition, the assessment of this NIF project shall dully take into account the exceptional situation and events that took place in the partner country from January 2011 and that have had an impact on the implementaion of the project.
33 Der er planer om at revidere systemet for forskudsbetalinger for ITF. 
33 It is envisaged to review the system of advance pay‐ ments for the ITF.
34 Projekterne under disse faciliteter godkendes og udvžlges direkte af de europžiske finansielle institutioner i fuld overensstemmelse med de ml, aktiviteter og kriterier, der er fastsat for projektet. 
34 Projects under these facilities are approved and selected directly by the European financial institu‐ tions in full compliance with the objectives, activi‐ ties and criteria established for the project.
Udvžlgelsen af underln og garantier bestemmes af de projektrelaterede parametre (som er specificeret i databladet), navnlig dem, der fastsžtter de ml, som projektet sigter mod. 
The selection of the sub‐loans and guarantees is deter‐ mined by the project‐related parameters (detailed in the fiche), in particular those spelling out the goals pursued by the project.
De finansielle institutioners standarder for rettidig omhu anvendes under godkendelses-og udvžlgelsesprocedu-rerne. 
Due diligence stand‐ ards of the financial institutions are applied during the approval and selection procedures.
Disse procedurer fżlger en vedtaget, omkostningseffektiv arbejdsdeling mellem partnerne, som omfatter regler for udvžlgelse af underordnede foranstaltninger. 
These pro‐ cedures follow an agreed and cost‐efficient division of labour among partners which include arrange‐ ments for the selection of the subordinated actions.
De berettigede finansielle institutioner aflžgger detaljeret rapport om de projekter, der indgr i faciliteten, bde regelmžssigt og p ad hoc-basis eller nr Kommissionen anmoder om det. 
The eligible financial institutions report in detail on the projects included in the facility on a regular as well as on ad hoc basis or when requested by the Commission.
Tekstboks 4 Efter Kommissionens mening fremgik alle de nżdvendige oplysninger af ansżgningsformularerne for NIF-projektet under finansieringsfaciliteten for SMVŐer. 
Box 4 The Commission considers that all necessary ele‐ ments were apparent in the grant application form of the NIF project of the SME Finance Facility.
35 Efter godkendelsen af projektet sżrger EU-delegationerne og/eller Kommissionens hovedkvarter (alt efter projektets omfang) for en passende opfżlgning. 
35 Following the project approval, the Union del‐ egations and/or the Commission Headquarters (depending on the scope of the project) secure adequate follow‐up.
Kommissionens tjenestegrene er jžvnligt i kontrakt med bankens nationale kontorer i de relevante lande, og der afholdes mżder med delegationen og de lokale projektkoordinatorer i de ledende finansielle institutioner. 
Commission services are in regular contact with the Bank’s national offices in the relevant countries, meetings take place with the delegation and the local project coordinators of the lead financial insti‐ tutions.
De ledende finansielle institutioner har en kontraktlig forpligtelse til hvert r at indsende rapporter til delegationen. 
The lead financial institutions have the con‐ tractual obligation to submit reports annually to the delegation.
Som fastsat i de kontrakter, der indgs som led i delegeret samarbejde, bliver Kommissionen desuden inddraget i, informeret om og inviteret til at deltage i de observatżrmissioner, som den ledende finansielle institution gennemfżrer i marken. 
Furthermore, as foreseen in contracts signed within delegated cooperation, the Commis‐ sion is involved, informed and invited to monitoring missions carried out by the lead financial Institution on the ground.
De kontraktlige ordninger er tilstržkkeligt klare til, at der kan foretages en passende overvgning. 
The contractual arrangements are sufficiently clear for adequate monitoring.
Anvisningerne til delegationerne vil blive opdateret med henblik herp. 
Instructions to delegations will be updated to this effect.
36 Kommissionen anerkender henvisningen til det igangvžrende arbejde med resultatorienterede indikatorer, som de finansielle institutioner skal bruge til overvgning og rapportering, og understreger, at den ledende finansielle institution foretager resultatovervgning. 
36 The Commission acknowledges the reference to the ongoing work on results‐based indicators to be used by the finance institutions for monitoring and reporting purposes and stresses that perfor‐ mance monitoring is carried out by the lead finance institution.
37 Alle projekterne underkastes overvgning og evaluering(er). 
37 All the projects are submitted to monitoring and evaluation(s).
Nogle midtvejsevalueringer er blevet afsluttet, som det er tilfžldet med NIF, eller vil snart blive ivžrksat, som det er tilfžldet med LAIF. 
Some mid‐term evaluations have been finalised, like in the case of NIF, or will be launched shortly, like in the case of LAIF.
Kommissionens svar 42 42 a) For den mulige finansiering uden ITF-bidrag under IMF-programmet var der rent faktisk et loft for ln, som ikke blev ydet p lempelige vilkr (se tabel 1 i IMFŐs landerapporter for 2009 og 2010), og alle yderligere ln skulle derfor ydes p lempelige vilkr. 
Reply of the Commission 42 42 (a) The possible financing without ITF contribution under the IMF programme had indeed a ceiling for non‐concessional lending (see Table 1 of the IMF Country Reports for 2009 and 2010), therefore any additional lending had to be concessional.
Beslutningen om, hvorvidt et givet projekt kommer i betragtning for ln p lempelige vilkr eller ej, er en suveržn beslutning, som tržffes af Zambia efter drżftelser med det internationale samfund, afhžngigt af de żkonomiske forhold i forbindelse med det enkelte projekt. 
The decision of any given project being considered for concessional or not lending is a sovereign decision of Zambia, after discussion with the international community depending on the economics of each project.
42 b) EUF-tilskuddet alene havde vist sig at vžre utilstržkkeligt til at sikre en tilstržkkelig finansiering af projekterne. 
42 (b) The EDF grant alone had proven insufficient to close the financing of the projects.
De yderligere midler, som var nżdvendige for at sl bro over finansieringsklżften, blev kun stillet til rdighed, fordi de finansielle institutioners midler blev mobiliseret gennem ITF-bidraget. 
The additional funding, necessary to close the funding gap, was made possible only by the mobilisation of financial institutions resources through the ITF contribution.
42 c) Tilskud kan have en hżj mervžrdi, selv om de er sm, f.eks. ved at sl bro over finansieringsklżften, forbedre projektets kvalitet osv. 
42 (c) Grants may have high added value even if small in size, for example in completing a financing gap, in improving the project quality, etc.