natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I alle de reviderede programmer er den definition p det tvžreuropžiske projekt, som Kommissionen giver i retningslinjerne (jf. punkt 13 og 14), omsat til stżtteberettigelses-og udvžlgelseskriterier, som der gives point for (det gžlder dog ikke EF-initiativ-programmet for Ems-Dollart-omrdet). 
In every one of the programmes examined, the definition of a trans-European project given in the Commission guidelines (see paragraphs 13 and 14) is put into practice by means of eligibility and selection criteria to which a rating scale is applied (save in the case of the Ems-Dollart Region CIP).
Sdanne kriterier er for eksempel, at der er en effekt p begge sider af gržnsen, hvor intenst samarbejdet mellem partnerne er, og oprettelse af gržnseoverskridende net. 
Such criteria might be, for example, that there is an impact on both sides of the border, the intensity of cooperation within the partnership or the setting up of cross-border networks.
Der tilfżjes andre kriterier, som anvendes ved vurderingen af den samlede kvalitet af projektet, (2) For en given stżtteberettiget regions vedkommende er det vanskeligt at sammenligne de finansielle midler, der er stillet til rdighed under Interreg III, og dem, der er stillet til rdighed under ml 1-og ml 2-interventionsprogrammerne, eftersom de stżtteberettigede omrder ikke er nżjagtig de samme. De regioner, der er stżtteberettigede under Interreg-interventionen, er nemlig ikke nżdvendigvis stżtteberettigede under ml nr. 
Other criteria are added for (2) For a given eligible region, it is difficult to compare the financial resources made available under Interreg III with those made available under Objective 1 and Objective 2 Intervention programmes, given that the eligible regions are not exactly the same, since regions eligible under Interreg do not necessarily have to be regions eligible under Objectives 1 and 2.
For s vidt angr Interreg-programmerne under linje A, kan det imidlertid ansls, at forholdet mellem disse finansielle midler varierer mellem 1/20 og 1/50. 
It may, however, be estimated that, for Strand A Interreg programmes, the ratio of financial resources varies between 1:20 and 1:50.
7.12.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 303/15 som f.eks. dets bidrag til opfyldelsen af foranstaltningens ml, dets innovative karakter, varigheden af dets effekt og partnernes kapacitet til at gennemfżre det. 
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/15 the assessment of overall project quality and might include a measureŐs contribution towards the objectives, whether or not it is innovative, the sustainability of its results and the partnersŐ capacity to see it through to its conclusion.
Beregner man det samlede antal point for hvert projekt, kan man sammenligne projekterne, men det har man ikke gjort i alle tilfžlde (EF-initiativ-programmet for Alpeomrdet, EF-initiativ-programmet for Spanien-Portugal, EF-initiativ-programmet for Rheintal-Bodensee-Hochrhein og EF-initiativ-programmet for nordżstlige omrde). 
A total score for each project would enable it to be compared with other projects but is not always calculated (Alps, Spain-Portugal, Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein and Northern Zone).
I żvrigt var der ikke i et eneste af de reviderede programmer defineret mindste-kvalitetskrav, som projekterne skulle opfylde for at kunne forelžgges eller godkendes. Det ville ellers vžre nyttigt med sdanne mindstekrav, for bestržbelserne p at f anvendt bevillingerne kan medfżre, at der vedtages projekter af mindre god kvalitet. 
Furthermore, none of the programmes examined defines a minimum quality threshold for projects to be submitted for consideration or approved, however useful such a threshold would be, given that concerns about the utilisation of appropriations may lead to the adoption of projects of inferior quality.
Hovedparten af de reviderede projekter (1) er tvžreuropžiske, for de er udarbejdet af partnere i forskellige medlemsstater, som skal gennemfżre dem sammen. 
Most of the projects examined (1) can be termed trans-European, having been prepared by a number of Member States which were to implement them jointly.
De er kendetegnet ved samarbejde. En ržkke projekter gr imidlertid i det vžsentlige ud p, at underprojekter gennemfżres sidelżbende p begge sider af gržnserne, og deres tvžreuropžiske vžrdi er relativt begržnset (linje A: infrastrukturarbejder p begge sider af gržnsen med henblik p flodturismen, arbejder p museer, renovering af to historiske beboelsesejendomme, selv om der er planer om en senere aktion, der skal gżre disse projekter gržnseoverskridende; renovering af to veje p den ene side af gržnsen og bygning af en vej p den anden side af gržnsen, bygning af en del af et teknologisk anlžg p den ene side af gržnsen og af et erhvervscenter p den anden side af gržnsen; linje B: etablering af netvžrk mellem otte partnere i fire medlemsstater med henblik p at oprette en inter-netportal efter samme model for hver enkelt af regionerne). 
Cooperation is a salient feature. However, some projects essentially consist of bringing parallel subprojects on both sides of the border under a single roof and have relatively little trans-European interest (Strand A: work on both sides of a border to develop river tourism infrastructure and museums and renovate two historic buildings, even if there are plans to follow up by imparting a cross-border identity to these projects; the resurfacing of two roads on one side of the border while a new road is built on the other; construction of part of a technology park on one side and a business park on the other.
Projekterne bidrager ikke altid sžrlig meget til lżsning af de gržnserelaterede problemer, for nogle af dem gr stort set ikke ud p andet end erfaringsudveksling og er ikke tilstržkkeligt akti-onsorienterede (linje A: overfżrsel af knowhow p det medicinske omrde, erfaringsudveksling mellem jordbrugere, oprettelse af et net af organisationer, der tilbyder virksomheder stżtte gennem afholdelse af fžlles seminarer; linje B: erfaringsudveksling om bekžmpelse af kysterosion). 
Projects do not always make a significant contribution to the resolution of border-related problems because some of them are limited almost exclusively to the exchange of experience and are not sufficiently focused on practical action (Strand A: the transfer of medical expertise, the exchange of experience between growers and the establishment of a network of organisations offering business support by means of joint seminars. Strand B: the exchange of experience on the prevention of coastal erosion).
At dżmme ud fra de fżrste projekter, der er godkendt, ser det ud til, at definitionen p det tvžreuropžiske projekt er blevet fulgt, og at de forskellige partnere samarbejder om gennemfżrelsen af mange af projekterne. 
It appears from the first projects to have been adopted that the definition of trans-European projects has been respected and that many projects entail the cooperation of all the partners.
En ržkke af dem har imidlertid begržnset mervžrdieffekt, fordi de ikke er aktionsorienterede, eller fordi de kunne vžre blevet gennemfżrt i andre regioner. 
Nonetheless, some offer limited added value because they do not focus on practical action or could have been implemented in other regions.
Systemerne til fastlžggelse af udvžlgelseskriterier kan ganske vist forbedres, men denne svaghed skyldes fżrst og fremmest, at de ml, der forfżlges, er upržcist formuleret, og at foranstaltningerne i hvert enkelt EF-initiativ-program er for omfattende (jf. punkt 59-63). 
Although the systems of selection criteria could be improved, this weakness is largely due to the imprecise nature of the stated objectives and the broad scope of the measures within each CIP (see paragraphs 59 to 63).
(1) Revisionen omfattede en stikprżve af projekter, der var udvalgt blandt de fżrste projekter, der blev godkendt af de myndigheder, der var ansvarlige for de EF-initiativ-programmer, revisionen džkkede. 
(1) The audit focused on a sample of projects selected among the first to have been adopted by the authorities responsible for each CIP chosen for inspection.
Der var endnu ikke indsendt udgiftsanmeldelser vedrżrende disse projekter. 
No statements of expenditure had yet been made for these projects.
I medfżr af grundforordningen om strukturfondene skal interventionerne evalueres, specielt skal der foretages efterfżlgende evaluering til bedżmmelse af interventionernes effekt. 
THE FEASIBILITY OF MEASURING PROGRESS EX POST 70. The basic instrument establishing the Structural Funds provides that interventions shall be evaluated, especially ex post, in order to assess their impact.
Resultaterne af evalueringen bżr bruges til at hżjne kvaliteten af de interventioner, der skal gennemfżres i de fżlgende perioder. 
The results of evaluation should be used to improve the quality of interventions in subsequent periods.
Er mlene for programmerne velstrukturerede? 
Are the programme objectives well structured?
Som det fremgr af bemžrkningerne om processen med fastlžggelse af prioriteterne og foranstaltningerne under de reviderede EF-initiativ-programmer i linje A og B (jf. punkt 55-63), kunne mlene ikke opstilles p grundlag af analysen af udgangssituationen i den pgžldende region og p grundlag af valg, der var led i en strategi. 
As is shown by the process of defining priorities and measures for the CIPs of Strands A and B previously examined (see paragraphs 55 to 63), it was not possible to set objectives on the basis of the regional situational analysis or any strategic choices made.
De fleste programmer har et eller to meget generelle ml og nogle delml. Det gžlder dog ikke bestemte programmer, som der er opstillet mange delml for (15 for EF-initiativ-programmet for Spanien-Portugal, 21 for EF-initiativ-programmet for Nordvesteuropa og 10 for EF-initiativ-programmet for det vestlige Middelhav) (jf. tabel 5). 
Most programmes have one or two very general objectives and a few sub-objectives, although a greater number of sub-objectives were set in some cases (15 for Spain-Portugal, 21 for Europe and 10 for the Western Mediterranean Ń see Table 5).
Nr der ikke er et klart og konkret hovedml, som er opdelt i de vigtigste delml, vil der blive problemer med at evaluere effekten. 
The absence of one main, clear and concrete objective broken down into its most important sub-objectives betokens difficulties in evaluating impact.
Alle EF-initiativ-programmerne under linje C blev opbygget med udgangspunkt i t eneste ml, som Kommissionen har defineret: effektivisering af regionaludviklings-og samhżrighedspolitikker og -instrumenter. 
The Strand C CIPs were designed in response to a single Commission objective, namely, to improve the effectiveness of policies and instruments for regional development and cohesion.
Der blev ikke opstillet delml. Er mlene mlelige, og er der sat tal p dem? 
No sub-objectives were set. Are the objectives measurable and quantified?
Kommissionen insisterede p, at der skulle opstilles indikatorer i hvert enkelt program. 
The Commission insisted that all programmes should include indicators.
En undtagelse herfra var programmerne under linje C, hvor man besluttede at udskyde fastlžggelsen af indikatorerne, indtil der var godkendt et tilstržkkeligt antal projekter, s man bedre kunne bedżmme indholdet af de igangsatte aktioner. 
The only exception concerns Strand C programmes: here it was decided not to establish indicators until such time as a sufficient number of projects had been adopted, so as to give a clearer understanding of the content of the actions carried out.
Derefter blev der s fastlagt indikatorer. 
Indicators were therefore identified.
For alle de reviderede programmer gžlder det imidlertid, at effekten slet ikke er mlt, eller at mlingen er meget ufuldstžndig, dvs. at indikatorerne kun mler et aspekt af de opstillede ml, eller at de Ń nr de vedrżrer en prioritet Ń kun džkker en del af de foranstaltninger, prioriteten omfatter (jf. tabel 5). 
However, every one of the programmes examined suffers from an unclear or very incomplete assessment of impact, that is, the indicators measure just one aspect of the stated objectives or, where they address a priority, deal with only a few of the measures under that priority (see Table 5).
Det er de skaldte indikatorer for gržnseoverskridning (2) og indikatorer for samarbejdsintensitet (3) (EF-initiativ-programmet for Alpeomrdet, EF-initiativ-programmet for Rheintal-Bodensee-Hochrhein og EF-initiativ-programmet for Ems-Dollart-omrdet; det er fastsat i EF-initiativ-programmet for Spanien-Portugal, at der skal fastlžgges sdanne indikatorer, men det er ikke sket). 
Some of the Strand A programmes have indicators which are independent of the stated objectives and known as Ôcross-border contextŐ (2) and Ôcooperation intensityŐ (3) indicators (Alps, Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein and Ems-Dollart Region; the Spain-Portugal CIP provides for such indicators but has not developed them).
De er ganske vist forskellige fra program til program, men meget (2) (3) For eksempel antallet af arbejdstagere, der krydser gržnsen til og fra arbejde, antallet af virksomheder med gržnseoverskridende aktiviteter, den procentuelle andel af befolkningen, der taler nabolandets sprog. 
Although these vary from one programme to the next, they are very general in nature and of limited relevance to (2) For example, the number of cross-border workers, the number of firms engaged in cross-border activity and the percentage of the population that can speak the language of the neighbouring country.
For eksempel antallet af fžlles informationssystemer, antallet af gržnseoverskridende net. 
(3) For example, the number of shared information systems and cross-border networks.
C 303/16 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 7.12.2004 generelle og af begržnset relevans for det pgžldende program. 
C 303/16 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 the programme concerned.
De kunne imidlertid have haft en vis relevans for linje A i dens helhed, hvis de var blevet videreudviklet og anvendt ensartet p alle EF-initiativ-programmerne under denne linje. 
They could, however, have had some relevance for Strand A as a whole if they had been developed and applied as standard to all the CIPs in this strand.
Det er i mange tilfžlde umuligt at se sammenhžngen mellem indikatorerne fra laveste niveau til hżjeste niveau, dvs. fra projektniveau til EF-initiativ-programmernes overordnede ml. 
It is often impossible to establish the relationship between indicators from the lowest to the highest levels, i.e., from project level to that of global CIP objectives.
Trods de konstaterede mangler har man forsżgt at sžtte tal p mlene for en ržkke programmer, i nogle tilfžlde p de overordnede ml, i andre tilfžlde p prioriteter eller foranstaltninger. 
Lastly, despite these shortcomings, there were attempts to quantify the objectives for a number of programmes, either globally or by reference to priorities or measures.
Retten har imidlertid ikke kunnet f adgang til arbejdspapirer, som viser, hvordan disse beregninger var foretaget. 
However, the working documents that were necessary to establish how quantification was carried out were unavailable.
Ml, der er sat tal p, er kun relevante, hvis de efterfżlgende kan sammenlignes med resultaterne, s der kan drages konklusioner. 
Yet if these quantified objectives are to have any relevance, it must be possible to compare them ex post with what has been achieved so that conclusions can be drawn.
Kan man ikke rekonstruere de betingelser, mlene blev opstillet under, er de konklusioner, man kan drage af denne sammenligning, ikke sžrlig velfunderede. 
If the context in which targets were set cannot be recreated, there will be little basis on which to draw conclusions from this comparison.
Der er tendens til at udskyde mlingen af mlopfyldel-sesgraden. 
There is a tendency to put off the business of measuring the degree to which objectives have been achieved.
Det er vanskeligt at fastlžgge hensigtsmžssige og anvendelige indikatorer, fordi EF-initiativ-programmernes ml er s generelle og foranstaltningerne s forskelligartede. Spżrgsmlet om indikatorerne bżr imidlertid afklares. Der bżr tržffes et valg, og man bżr kun beholde dem, der er nżdvendige for overvgningen af, hvordan et EF-initiativ-program skrider frem, dem, der er nżdvendige for, at der kan tržffes beslutninger, og dem, der er nżdvendige til mling af programmets effekt. 
The general nature of the objectives defined for each CIP and the diversity of measures hamper the identification of relevant and workable indicators. However, it is important that the situation be clarified and a selection made with the aim of retaining only those indicators that are essential for monitoring the progress of the CIP, making decisions or measuring programme impact.
Kun to af de otte reviderede programmer (EF-initiativ-programmet for Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein og EF-initiativ-programmet for Ems-Dollart-omrdet) havde et it-system til forvaltning af projekterne og en database til oplysninger om indikatorerne. 
Just two of the eight programmes examined (Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein and Ems-Dollart Region) employed a computerised project management system and a database for compiling information to be used when setting indicators.
Forskellige regioner i medlemsstaterne havde udviklet deres egne systemer, og det kan kun żge omkostningerne og forsinke overvgningen af EF-initiativ-programmerne. 
Systems had been developed separately in different regions of the Member States, but this can only mean higher costs and delays in the implementation of programme monitoring.
KONKLUSION OG ANBEFALINGER Konklusion 79. 
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusion 79.
I forhold til de svagheder, Retten konstaterede under undersżgelsen af Interreg I, er det tvžreuropžiske element i projekterne og samarbejdet om gennemfżrelsen af EF-initiativ-programmerne blevet styrket (jf. punkt 7). 
Compared with the shortcomings noted during the CourtŐs audit of Interreg I, there have been improvements to the trans-European nature of projects and cooperation in the implementation of CIPs (see paragraph 7).
Der er dog stadig store forsinkelser, og selv om der er gjort forsżg p at finde en tilfredsstillende lżsning p spżrgsmlet om evalueringen af EF-initiativets effekt, er det ikke lykkedes, til dels fordi de forfulgte ml er s upržcist og bredt formulerede i retningslinjerne og i EF-initiativ-programmerne. 
However, there are still serious delays and, despite some efforts, a satisfactory solution is still to be found for evaluating the CIŐs impact, owing in part to the imprecision and very broad scope of the objectives set in the guidelines and at CIP level.
Retningslinjerne vedrżrer de operative procedurer, men de blev offentliggjort for sent, og mlene i dem er for generelle 80. 
The guidelines focus on operational procedures but were made available too late and contain over-generalised objectives 80.
Kommissionen definerer i retningslinjerne det tvžreuropžiske projekt, der skal gennemfżres under hvert enkelt EF-initiativ-program (jf. punkt 13 og 14), og strammer kravene til gennemfżrelsen. 
With a view to enhancing cooperation, the Commission guidelines contain a definition of the trans-European projects that are to be implemented in every CIP (see paragraphs 13 and 14) and establish stricter requirements concerning implementation.
Sdanne strukturer kan repržsentere de forskellige involverede regioner og vžre ansvarlige for aspekter af gennemfżrelsen (jf. punkt 15 og 16). 
Bodies of this sort are able to represent the various regions concerned and take on the task of implementation (see paragraphs 15 and 16).
I de nye retningslinjer fastsžttes der ikke pržcise og mlelige ml. 
The new guidelines do not contain objectives that are targeted and measurable.
Derimod ppeges mulige aktionsomrder, hvor medlemsstaternes regioner opfordres til at samarbejde om temaer, som det er op til dem selv at definere i fžllesskab. 
Instead, they outline a possible field of action in which the regions of the Member States are encouraged to work together on issues which it is up to them to define jointly.
Kommissionen har ikke defineret fžlles indikatorer til mling af resultaterne af initiativet i Fžllesskabet som helhed (jf. punkt 17-25). 
The Commission has not established common indicators which would allow the progress achieved through implementation of the Initiative to be measured globally at Community level (see paragraphs 17 to 25).
For linje AŐs vedkommende har man Ń p grund af den gžldende NUTS-nomenklatur Ń ikke kunnet finde en lżsning p det problem, at de stżtteberettigede omrder i en ržkke medlemsstater er for store til, at der kan etableres et effektivt samarbejde (jf. punkt 26). 
As regards Strand A, no solution has been found, using the present characteristics of the NUTS nomenclature, to the problem of the existence, in a number of Member States, of areas which are too large to allow effective cooperation (see paragraph 26).
Kommissionens retningslinjer og de arbejdspapirer, der skulle vžre en hjžlp for medlemsstaterne ved udarbejdelsen af deres programmer, blev offentliggjort p et sent tidspunkt, hvor medlemsstaterne allerede var begyndt at forberede forslagene til EF-initiativ-programmer. 
The Commission guidelines and the working papers produced to help the Member States with programme planning were published late, after the Member States had started work on preparing their CIP proposals.
Det forsinkede ivžrksžttelsen af EF-initiativ-programmerne, og det kan ogs have vžret medvirkende til, at nogle af programmerne ikke blev af sžrlig god kvalitet (jf. punkt 28 og 29). 
This delayed the implementation of the CIPs and may have resulted in programmes of a mediocre quality (see paragraphs 28 and 29).
Kommissionens undersżgelse af forslagene til EF-initiativ-programmer bżr forbedres 84. 
The procedure for examining CIP proposals must be improved 84.
De kriterier, der blev lagt til grund ved undersżgelsen af kvaliteten af de forslag til programmer, medlemsstaterne indsendte, blev ikke pržciseret og forberedt godt nok. 
The criteria for examining the quality of programme proposals submitted by the Member States were lacking in detail and inadequately prepared.
Kommissionens undersżgelse af forslagene til EF-initiativ-programmer resulterede ikke i alle tilfžlde i, at kvaliteten af EF-initiativ-programmerne blev forbedret s meget, som det var żnskeligt (jf. punkt 31, 32 og 33.a)). 
The procedure for examining CIP proposals did not always result in the desired improvements (see paragraphs 31 to 33(a)).
Sdanne forsinkelser bevirker, at der bliver mindre tid til udarbejdelsen af projekterne, og de giver ogs stżrre eller mindre afbržk i samarbejdet mellem stżtteberettigede regioner i medlemsstaterne. 
Delays of this nature limit the time available for developing projects and mean a more or less lengthy interruption in the process of cooperation between eligible regions in the Member States.
Som fżlge af disse forsinkelser blev forpligtelsesbevillingerne i tranchen for 2000 reallokeret, og udnyttelsesgraden for betalingsbevillingerne blev meget lav i de fżrste fire r af perioden (jf. punkt 35-39). 
As a result, commitment appropriations were reallocated in 2000 and payment appropriations were under-utilised throughout the first four years of the period (see paragraphs 35 to 39).
7.12.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 303/17 Parterne samarbejdede i det store og hele om forberedelsen og starten p gennemfżrelsen 86. 
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/17 Preparation and the start of implementation are generally characterised by cooperation 86.
Efter denne hżringsprocedure blev der imidlertid ikke truffet specifikke valg, og derfor blev nogle EF-initiativ-programmer ikke tilstržkkeligt mlrettede (jf. punkt 41 og 42). 
However, as no choices ensued, this process led to CIPs that were poorly targeted (see paragraphs 41 and 42).
Enhedsreglen for gennemfżrelsesorganerne og de finansielle elementer var fulgt ved hvert enkelt EF-initiativ-program. 
CIPs were constructed around shared implementing bodies and financial elements.