natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Retten har gennemget Kommissionens kompetente tjenestegrenes akter om projektansżgninger og konstateret, at de vžsentlige stżttebetingelser, der er fastsat i forordningen, og som er grundlaget for hver stżttebeslutning, ikke i alle tilfžlde var opfyldt, og at der ikke systematisk blev udarbejdet omkostnings-effektivitetsanalyser, costbenefitanalyser og konsekvensanalyser. Det var nemlig ikke angivet i ansżgningsformularen, hvilke metoder der skulle anvendes. 
Desk audits of the case files in the relevant Commission offices showed that the essential elements stipulated by the Regulation (on which the individual decisions were based) were not always on file and that the cost-effectiveness, cost/performance and impact analyses in respect of the project had not been drawn up systematically since no precise instructions concerning the methods to be followed had been included in the form provided for this purpose.
Man havde heller ikke altid undersżgt alternativer til et forelagt projekt. 
Likewise, alternatives to the project had not always been studied and taken into consideration.
Hvad angik en ržkke aktioner gennemfżrt inden for de fire grupper af projekter, revisionen omfattede i Spanien, havde Kommissionen sledes ikke nžrmere kendskab til deres geografiske placering og udgifternes stżrrelse. 
For this reason, in the case of some actions within the framework of the four groups of projects audited in Spain, the Commission was not always aware of the details (as far as the locality and the amounts involved were concerned).
I Portugal kunne man ikke mle et infrastrukturprojekts żkonomiske og sociale rentabilitet ud fra costbenefitanalysen. 
In Portugal, analysis of the costs and benefits associated with an infrastructure project did not produce any insight into the economic and social returns.
I nogle tilfžlde havde det vžret hensigtsmžssigt, hvis Kommissionen havde taget potentielle indtžgter i betragtning i sin analyse, selv om den gžldende forordning (792/93) ikke indeholder en sdan bestemmelse. 
Although there are no provisions on this in the current Regulation (792/93), on the basis of which the project was financed, in certain cases the Commission could usefully have taken potential revenue into account in its analysis.
I Gržkenland er det konsulenter, der udarbejder stżtteansżgningerne p miljżomrdet med det dertil hżrende materiale og foretager de sociożkonomiske undersżgelser (costbenefitanalyser, beregning af den interne żkonomiske eller finansielle rente og vurdering af projektets virkninger p beskžftigelsen), ofte uden at aflžgge besżg hos den pgžldende endelige modtager. 
In Greece, in the field of the environment, the consultants draw up files on applications for assistance and, in particular, compile socioeconomic studies (cost-benefit analyses, calculation of the economic and financial internal rate of return (IRR) and estimation of the projectŐs impact in terms of job creation), often without making visits to the final beneficiary concerned.
Under revisionen fandt Retten eksempler p inkonsekvens: Ń De potentielle indtžgter fra et projekt fremgik af den sociożkonomiske analyse, men var ikke medregnet ved fastsžttelsen af den maksimale stżttesats fra Fonden. Ń Icostbenefitanalyserneafsektorprojekterafsammearthavde Kommissionen accepteret forskellige former for omkostninger. 
Within the framework of the checks carried out inconsistencies were discovered, in particular: Ń the existence of potential revenue generated by a project included in the socioeconomic analysis which was not taken into account when fixing the maximum rate of CF assistance, Ńdifferenttypesofcostareconsideredtobeacceptablebythe Commission, in the CBAs, in respect of sectoral projects of the same type.
I visse tilfžlde var laste-og losseomkostninger medtaget, i andre tilfžlde ikke, uden nogen forklaring. 
Some allow for handling charges, others do not, without any explanation.
Indirekte personale-eller driftsudgifter som f.eks. elektricitet var medtaget i nogle projekter og ikke i andre. 
Indirect staff costs and operating costs such as electricity may be included in some projects but not in others.
I de fleste tilfžlde var disse belżb ansat for hżjt eller var forkerte. Ń Den sociożkonomiske undersżgelse af et projekt i Kalamata (Gržkenland) byggede p data, der hidrżrte fra et tilsvarende projekt p Rhodos, men de ansvarlige havde ikke p noget tidspunkt anfžgtet oplysningerne. 
For the most part, these data are often overestimated or incorrect, Ń for a project in Kalamata (Greece), the socio-economic study used data from a similar project in Rhodes and at no time was this queried by the parties involved, Ń job-creation estimates submitted in the project applications had sometimes been overestimated or were unrealistic.
Eftersom de oplysninger og analyser, der indgives sammen med ansżgningerne, ikke altid er fuldstžndige eller plidelige, kan Kommissionen ikke altid sikre sig inden godkendelsen, at de foreslede projekter er de bedst egnede. 
Considering the fact that the explanatory and analytical documents included with a project application are not always exhaustive and reliable, the Commission is not always in a position to ensure that the projects proposed are the most effective before authorising them.
Under revisionen af beslutningerne om at yde stżtte kunne Retten ikke se, hvilke projekter Kommissionen havde afvist, og det var heller ikke muligt at f en oversigt over de vigtigste begrundelser for at afvise projekter, som var forelagt af de stżtteberettigede medlemsstater. 
On the other hand, it was not possible, in the context of the controls carried out, to identify the projects rejected by the Commission or to draw up a list of the main motives for the rejection of projects submitted by the beneficiary Member States.
C 279/10 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 2.10.2000 Koordineringen af Samhżrighedsfonden og EFRU 21. 
C 279/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 2.10.2000 Coordination between the Cohesion Fund and the ERDF 21.
I alle de stżtteberettigede medlemsstater er den nationale struktur, der er ansvarlig for stżttemidlerne fra Fonden, fuldt integreret i den eksisterende administrative struktur for EFRU. 
In all the cohesion Member States the national system for the implementation of the CF has been fully integrated with the existing structures for the administration of the ERDF.
I mange tilfžlde er det de samme embedsmžnd - det er f.eks. tilfžldet i Portugal og Irland - der er ansvarlige bde for forvaltningen af det operationelle sektorprogram under EFRU og Fondens projekter inden for samme omrde. 
Often, as in the case of Portugal and Ireland, it is the same national administrators that are responsible both for the sectoral OP of the ERDF and the CF projects in the same field.
Nr de administrative befżjelser er samlet hos de samme embedsmžnd og ministerier, er det i praksis nemmere at koordinere Fonden og EFRU, selv om disse to stżt-teinstrumenter bygger p forskellige administrative koncepter, det ene p programmering og det andet p projektorienteret forvaltning. 
In practice, this concentration of responsibilities on the same administrators and ministries favours coordination between the CF and the ERDF, even if the two instruments obey different administrative logics, one based on programming and the other on the management of projects.
Generelt fungerer forvaltningssystemerne og organisations-strukturerne sdan, at der ikke er stor risiko for overtrždelse af bestemmelserne i fondsforordningens artikel 9 om kumulering og overlapning mellem forskellige EF-finansieringskilder, dvs. at ingen udgiftspostkanfstżttesamtidigfraFondenogfrastrukturfon-dene. 
Generally, the management and organisational systems work in such a way that there is no more than a slight risk of non-compliance with Article 9 of the CF Regulation concerning the cumulating and overlapping of sources of Community finance, i.e. no item of expenditure may benefit simultaneously from CF and Structural Fund assistance.
Det er nyttigt for Kommissionen at kende sammenhžngen mellem eller mulighederne for synergivirkninger mellem de projekter, der finansieres af henholdsvis Fonden og EFRU. 
It is useful for the Commission to know the possible links and synergies between the projects financed by the CF or the ERDF.
Derfor skal potentielle forbindelser med andre projekter, der finansieres af EF, ogs udtrykkeligt angives p ansżgningsformularerne til Fonden. 
For this reason the CF application forms explicitly provide for mention of the potential links with other projects financed by the European Community.
Denationalemyndighederhavdeimidlertidikkealtidudfyldtdisse formularer korrekt. 
It was found, however, that the forms were not always filled out correctly by the national authorities.
Forvaltningen af henholdsvis Fonden og EFRU varetages af de samme ministerier, men disse ministerier prioriterer det hżjere at f udnyttet bevillingerne til disse to instrumenter bedst muligt end at sikre den generelle sammenhžng i de strukturpolitikker, de stżtter. 
Even if the management of the CF and of the ERDF is carried out in the same ministries, priority is nevertheless given to optimising the appropriations allocated to the two instruments, rather than to the overall coherence of the structural policies which they support.
Budgethensyn og sektorbestemte hensyn 25. 
Budgetary and sectoral constraints 25.
Formlet med den projektbaserede fremgangsmde er at give Kommissionen mulighed for at definere kriterierne for udvžlgelsen af projekter mere pržcist. Den skal ogs give Kommissionen et klarere billede af de godkendte projekters indvirkning p den żkonomiske og sociale samhżrighed og efterfżlgende sikre en mere effektiv kontrol af Fondens indsats. 
The aim of the project approach was to enable the Commission to apply more rigorous project selection criteria, to gain a better understanding of the impact on economic and social cohesion of the projects approved, to improve, as a consequence, controls and to increase transparency and the quality of CF actions.
P denne mde kan Kommissionen bidrage mere aktivt til opbygningen af de transeuropžiske transportnet og beskyttelsen af miljżet. 
The Commission is thus able to play a more active role in the construction of trans-European transport networks and in the protection of the environment.
Denne projektbaserede strategi har imidlertid vžret vanskelig at gennemfżre i praksis. 
However, this project approach was difficult to implement.
Det faktum, at projekterne forelžgges individuelt p forskellige tidspunkter, gżr det vanskeligt at sammenligne dem, og medfżrer, at man ikke kan sikre, at det er de bedste af projekterne, der udvžlges til godkendelse. 
The fact that projects are submitted individually and at different times makes it difficult to compare them with each other and is not conducive to their selection for approval.
Der opereres med et flerrigt rammebelżb, og Kommissionen meddeler de ansvarlige nationale myndigheder det rlige vejledende budget med en afbalanceret fordeling mellem transportinfrastrukturer og miljż. 
Within the framework of a multiannual budget, the Commission notifies the responsible national authorities of the indicative annual budget with a balanced distribution between transport infrastructure and the environment.
Hvilke foranstaltninger der skal gennemfżres, besluttes dels p grundlag af de overordnede retningslinjer, som bl.a. er fastsat i traktaten, dels p grundlag af en national strategi med sžrlige prioriteringer inden for de to berżrte sektorer. 
The actions to be carried out are determined both on the basis of general guidelines as set out, in particular, in the Treaty, and on the basis of a national strategy with its own priorities in the two sectors concerned.
Programmeringen er som hovedregel ikke foreget i samme tempo i de to sektorer. 
The programming for the two sectors concerned was, in general, carried out at different rates.
P transportinfrastrukturomrdet har man normalt kunnet stżtte sig til mange rs erfaringer med programmering, og projektforslagene har som regel vžret velforberedte, medens erfaringerne p miljżomrdet er af langt nyere dato. 
Generally, the transport infrastructure sector can draw on long experience of programming and had sufficient well-designed projects, whereas in the environmental field the experience acquired is of more recent date.
I de fleste af de stżtteberettigede lande er miljżprojekterne da ogs fżrst blevet godkendt vžsentligt senere end transportinfrastruk-turprojekterne. 
In most cohesion countries, therefore, the environmental projects were approved late in comparison with those in the field of transport infrastructure.
P nationalt plan tages der ved udvžlgelsen af projekterne som hovedregel hensyn til, hvor godt og detaljeret projekterne er udformet, navnlig hvor hurtigt de vil kunne ivžrksžttes. Der tages ogs hensyn til den ržkkefżlge, ansżgningerne er indgivet i. 
Generally, at national level, the project selection procedure takes into account how well-developed, in terms of quantity and quality, the project plans are, in particular how far advanced the projects are; it is also influenced by the chronological order in which projects for which assistance has been requested are submitted.
Projekternes geografiske fordeling 31. 
Geographical distribution of the projects 31.
Den finansielle stżtte, EF yder via Fonden, gr til de stżtteberettigede medlemsstater og ikke til bestemte regioner. 
Community financial assistance within the CF framework is given to the beneficiary Member States and not to the regions.
Der er ikke forudset nogen regional fordeling af stżtten, og i overensstemmelse med subsidiaritetsprincippet phviler det de nationale myndigheder at udvžlge de projekter, man żnsker at gennemfżre i de pgžldende regioner. Og nr disse projekter er godkendt af Kommissionen, skal de nationale myndigheder overfżre bevillingerne til de pgžldende regioner. 
There is no provision for a regional breakdown of the assistance granted and, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, it is the responsibility of the national government to select the applications for financing the projects which are to be implemented in the regions concerned and, after their approval by the Commission, to transfer the appropriations to the said regions.
2.10.2000 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 279/11 32. 
2.10.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 279/11 32.
Det er de centrale administrative strukturer, der er ansvarlige for stżtteansżgningerne til Fonden, og det gżr det lettere at gennemfżre ansżgnings-, tilsyns-og kontrolprocedurerne. Det kan imidlertid forekomme, at projekter, der forvaltes p centralt plan, behandles anderledes end projekter, der forvaltes regionalt. 
Although the centralised administrative structures responsible for the CF files facilitate the implementation of the application, monitoring and control procedures, there may be differences between the treatment of the projects managed at central and those managed at regional level.
I Spanien har de nationale myndigheder sledes besluttet, at EF-medfinansieringssatsen for projekter, der forelžgges af centraladministrationen, er 85 %, mens den for projekter, der forvaltes af de regionale forvaltninger, kun er 80 %. 
Thus, in Spain, following a decision by the national authorities, the rate of Community co-financing for projects submitted by central government is set at 85 %, whereas those managed by the regional administrations only receive 80 %.
Langsommelige godkendelsesprocedurer 33. Kommissionen skal i henhold til fondsforordningens artikel 10 tržffe beslutning om stżtte fra Fonden inden tre mneder efter at have modtaget ansżgningen fra medlemsstaten. 
Table 4 Time taken for approval of project applications at the Commission Slowness of the approval procedures 33. In accordance with Article 10 of the Regulation, the Com-missionmusttakeadecisionconcerningthegrantingofCFassis- tance within three months of receipt of the application submitted by the Member State.
Kommissionen overholder ikke altid denne frist i praksis, jf. tabel 4, der viser de stżrste forsinkelser konstateret under revisionen. 
In practice this deadline is not always adhered to by the Commission, as shown by Table 4, which highlights the longest delays found.
Portugal Medlemsstat/projekt Projektnr. 94/10/65/001 93/10/61/007 94/10/61/028 95/10/65/002 94/07/61/010 94/07/61/013 97/07/61/002 93/07/65/016 93/09/61/020 93/09/61/023 93/09/61/044 94/09/61/011 94/09/61/021 95/11/65/007 93/11/65/025 97/11/61/051 91/11/61/053 Dato for indsendelse af ansżgningen 11.2.1994 1.1.1993 5.9.1995 7.3.1995 22.11.1994 22.11.1994 13.1.1997 1.1.1993 1.1.1993 2.7.1993 2.7.1993 1.9.1994 27.7.1994 7.4.1995 22.7.1994 25.6.1997 8.7.1997 Dato for Kommissionens godkendelse 18.11.1997 8.12.1995 15.12.1997 24.7.1997 15.12.1997 15.12.1997 21.10.1998 29.7.1996 18.3.1996 5.11.1996 12.12.1996 28.7.1997 13.7.1998 12.12.1997 10.1.1995 1.12.1998 1.12.1998 Stżttebelżb fra Fonden (EUR) Sagsbehandling (antal mneder) Integreret informationssystem i havnen i Setubal Džmning i Enxo og vandledninger Vandkraftvžrket i Alqueva Renovering og udvidelse af indsejlingen til havnen i Santa Apolonia Irland Vandforsyningsprojekt i Burren og North Clare Vandforsyningsprojekt i Waterford City og omegn Spildevandsbehandling i Dublin-regionen Udbygning af containerterminalen i Cork Gržkenland Kloakering og biologisk spildevandsbehandling i Khos Kloakering og biologisk spildevandsbehandling i Preveza Kloakering og biologisk spildevandsbehandling i Lvrion Udvidelse af kapaciteten p Mornos-akvždukten Kloakering og biologisk spildevandsbehandling i Souffli Spanien Hżjhastighedstog Madrid-Barcelona Valencia-Tarragona Spildevandsbehandling Ń Balearerne Vandledninger i Guadiana-bžkkenet Kilde: Revisionsretten. 
Project No 94/10/65/001 93/10/61/007 94/10/61/028 95/10/65/002 94/07/61/010 94/07/61/013 97/07/61/002 93/07/65/016 93/09/61/020 93/09/61/023 93/09/61/044 94/09/61/011 94/09/61/021 95/11/65/007 93/11/65/025 97/11/61/051 91/11/61/053 Date application sent 11.2.1994 1.1.1993 5.9.1995 7.3.1995 22.11.1994 22.11.1994 Date of Commission approval 18.11.1997 8.12.1995 15.12.1997 24.7.1997 15.12.1997 Cohesion Fund amount (in EUR) 1 445 850 21 698 045 64 553 443 29 892 885 9 619 099 12 637 752 5 760 000 5 364 600 4 980 000 7 420 000 4 533 360 26 484 300 2 122 910 291 765 875 24 387 730 22 674 085 17 500 041 Time in months 45 31 38 28 37 37 21 36 32 40 41 34 48 32 19 18 17 15.12.1997 13.1.1997 21.10.1998 1.1.1993 1.1.1993 2.7.1993 2.7.1993 1.9.1994 27.7.1994 7.4.1995 22.7.1994 25.6.1997 8.7.1997 29.7.1996 18.3.1996 5.11.1996 12.12.1996 28.7.1997 13.7.1998 12.12.1997 10.1.1995 1.12.1998 1.12.1998
C 279/12 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 2.10.2000 34. 
C 279/12 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 2.10.2000 34.
Det fremgr af Rettens analyse af systemet, at en projektansżgning enten fżrst skal behandles i det ministerium, der er ansvarligt for miljżomrdet, eller det ministerium, der er ansvarligt for transportinfrastruktur. Derefter sendes den til det nationale organ, der er ansvarligt for stżttemidlerne fra Fonden, og som selv sender ansżgningen videre til Kommissionen efter en sidste kontrol. 
Analysis of the system shows that a project application must be examined by the Ministry responsible for the environment or by the Ministry responsible for the transport infrastructure, as appropriate,andthensenttothenationalofficeresponsiblefor the CF, which, in turn, forwards it to the Commission after final verification, so that an individual decision of approval can be taken by the Commission.
P de forskellige stadier i de nationale myndigheders behandling af ansżgningen fżlges der ikke kriterier, som kan sikre, at alle betingelserne for stżtte fra Fonden er opfyldt. 
The various stages of the national application procedure are not subject to any intermediate decisional criteria that could be applied at an intermediate stage and so ensure that all the conditions for CF financing have been fulfilled.
Derfor kan de ansvarlige organer p nationalt og regionalt plan eller i de enkelte sektorer heller ikke p noget tidspunkt i denne procedure efterprżve de oplysninger, der er givet i ansżgningen om EF-stżtte. 
At no time during the national procedure, therefore, are the responsible national, sectoral or regional offices in a position to verify the facts submitted in the project application with regard to their possible financing by the Community.
De nationale myndigheders behandling af ansżgningerne gr forholdsvis hurtigt, og det kan navnlig tilskrives fżlgende: a) Overgangen fra den ene fase til den nžste, som beskrevet i det foregende punkt, gr hurtigere, fordi Kommissionen ikke har overdraget de pgžldende medlemsstater nogen beslutnings-befżjelser p dette omrde. Disse medlemsstater kan ikke godkende projektforslag, ikke engang delvis. b) Kontrollen p stedet af de enkelte elementer i projektet kan gennemfżres hurtigt p nationalt plan. c) Eftersom stżtteperioden starter den dato, medlemsstaten forelžgger projektansżgningen for Kommissionen, er det vigtigt for medlemsstaten at f indgivet ansżgningen s hurtigt som muligt. 
At the national level, the duration of the examination of each application is, in general, quite short on account, in particular, of the following aspects: (a) progressfromoneleveltoanother,asdescribedinthepreced-ing paragraph, is all the more rapid because no responsibility has been delegated by the Commission to the Member State concerned to enable it to approve, even partially, a project application; (b) on-the-spotverificationsoftheconstituentpartsoftheproject can be carried out rapidly within the national framework; (c) since the date on which the project application is forwarded by the Member State concerned to the Commission is taken as the mark for the beginning of the period of eligibility, it is in the Member StateŐs interest to speed up the entry of the application.
I Kommissionen bliver hver enkelt projektansżgning grundigt gennemget. Der tages her hensyn til alle vžsentlige elementer i projektet og i de fleste tilfžlde ogs til EIBŐs evaluering (jf. punkt 14-15). 
At Commission level every project application is subjected to a thorough examination which takes into account the essential elements on which the decision is to be based and the evaluation carried out, in the majority of cases, by the EIB (see paragraphs 14 and 15).
Der kan g op til tre r fra den dato, medlemsstaten fremsender projektansżgningen, og til den er godkendt af Kommissionen. I mange tilfžlde skyldes det, at der m anmodes om yderligere oplysninger. rsagen til, at behandlingen tržkker sdan i langdrag, skal somme tider ogs findes i medlemsstaterne, men det skaber under alle omstžndigheder usikkerhed hos de nationale ansvarlige organer bde i den indledende godkendelsesfase, og nr det senere kan blive nżdvendigt at foretage žndringer. 
The period of time found to have elapsed between the date on which the Member State concerned forwarded the project application and the date of its approval by the Commission may be more than three years and requests for additional information are often the explanation.
Begreberne ČprojektÇ og ČprojektfinansieringÇ 38. 
The definition of project and project financing 38.
Fonden kan bidrage til finansieringen af projekter eller projektfaser, der er teknisk og finansielt adskilte, eller grupper af projekter, der er led i en synlig strategi og danner et samlet hele. Under alle omstžndigheder skal de samlede udgifter til et projekt eller en gruppe af projekter i princippet vžre mindst 10 millioner euro. 
The CF may contribute to the financing of projects or stages of projects which are technically and financially independent or groups of projects linked to a visible strategy which form a coher-entwhole.Inanyevent,thetotalcostofaprojectorgroupof projects may not, in principle, be less than EUR 10 million.