natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen m definere, hvilke oplysninger den virkelig har brug for, og den m udarbejde klare retningslinjer til brug for medlemsstaterne p dette omrde og, om nżdvendigt, nedfžlde dem i en forordning. 
The Commission must identify which information it really needs and issue clear guidance to Member States in this regard and, if necessary, put it on a regulatory basis.
Isžr bżr Kommissionen gżre en stżrre indsats for at sikre sig, at medlemsstaternes oplysninger om resultaterne af administrativ kontrol og kontrol p stedet er sammenlignelige og fuldstžndige. 
In particular, more effort should be made to ensure that information supplied by Member States on the results of administrative and on-the-spot checks is consistent and complete.
De nuvžrende begržnsninger forhindrer Kommissionen i at fżre effektivt tilsyn med medlemsstaternes gennemfżrelse af IFKS. 
The current limitations inhibit the CommissionŐs ability to effectively manage the implementation of IACS by the Member States.
81. a) b) Retten anbefaler: at reglerne for de forskellige IFKS-relaterede foranstaltninger forenkles, harmoniseres og formuleres mere pržcist, og at indbyrdes uoverensstemmelser og modsigelser fjernes at der udarbejdes en hndbog med IFKS-fortolkninger og -procedurer, som regelmžssigt ajourfżres og stilles til rdighed for medlemsstaterne. 
Recommendations 81. The Court recommends: (a) thattherulesgoverningthevariousmeasuresrelatingtoIACS should be simplified, harmonised and formulated in a more precise manner, and inconsistencies and contradictions should be eliminated from them; (b) that an IACS interpretation and procedures manual should be issued and regularly updated and made available to the Member States.
Denne hndbog bżr indeholde Vedtaget af Revisionsretten i Luxembourg p mżdet den 6. og 7. juni 2001. 
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 6 et 7 June 2001.
31.7.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende BILAG REGLER FOR PLŽGGELSE AF SANKTIONER I 1998 FOR SEN INDGIVELSE AF ANSŻGNING (artikel 8) Nedsžttelse af stżttebelżbet med 1 % pr. arbejdsdag (der ydes ingen stżtte, hvis ansżgningen indgives mere end 25 dage for sent). 
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities ANNEX RULES FOR APPLICATION OF SANCTIONS IN 1998 LATE LODGEMENT OF A CLAIM (Article 8) 1 % reduction of aid per working day of late lodgement (no aid at all if claim is lodged more than 25 days late).
Pligten til at indgive ansżgning om arealstżtte gžlder ikke for landbrugere, der kun ansżger om pržmier for kvžg, hvis de pgžldende landbrugere er fritaget for belžgningskravet og ikke sżger om ekstensiveringspržmier (mindre producenter), og pligten gžlder heller ikke landbrugere, der kun ansżger om pržmien for moderfr og geder eller sžsonpržmien. 
An area aid application need not be submitted by farmers applying for only bovine animals that are exempted from the stocking rate requirement and do not apply for extensification premiums (small producers), or only for ewe or goat premium, or deseasonalisation premium.
AREALSTŻTTE (artikel 9) Konstateres det, at det areal, der faktisk fastsls, er stżrre end det, der er angivet i ansżgningen om arealstżtte, tages det angivne areal i betragtning ved stżtteberegningen. 
AREA AID (Article 9) If the area actually determined is found to be greater than that declared in the ÔareaŐ aid application, the area declared shall be used for calculation of the aid.
Konstateres det, at det areal, som er angivet i ansżgningen om arealstżtte, er stżrre end det fastslede areal, beregnes stżttebelżbet p grundlag af det areal, der er fastslet under kontrollen. 
If the area actually determined is found to be less than that declared in an ÔareaŐ aid application, the area actually determined on inspection shall be used for calculation of the aid.
Medmindre der foreligger force majeure, nedsžttes det fastslede areal dog med to gange det overskydende areal, hvis det overskydende areal udgżr over 3 % eller 2 hektar men hżjst 20 % af det fastslede areal. 
However, except in cases of force majeure, the area actually determined on inspection shall be reduced by twice the difference found if this is more than 3 % or two hectares but not more than 20 % of the determined area.
Hvis det overskydende areal udgżr over 20 % af det fastslede areal, ydes der ingen arealstżtte. 
If the difference is more than 20 % of the determined area no area-linked aid shall be granted.
Er der imidlertid tale om urigtige angivelser, som er forsžtlige eller skyldes grov uagtsomhed: Ń udelukkes landbrugeren fra stżtteordningen i det kalenderr, der er tale om, og Ń hvisderertaleomenforsžtligurigtigangivelse,udelukkeslandbrugerenidetfżlgendekalenderrfraenhverstżtte,der er direkte omfattet af IFKS, til et areal, der svarer til det, stżtteansżgningen blev afvist for. 
However, in the case of a false declaration made intentionally or as a result of serious negligence: Ń the farmer in question shall be excluded from the aid scheme concerned for the calendar year in question, and Ń in the case of a false declaration intentionally made, from any aid scheme included directly in IACS for the following calendar year, in respect of an area equal to that for which his aid application was rejected.
I denne artikel forsts ved Čfastslet arealÇ det areal, for hvilket alle betingelser i bestemmelserne er opfyldt. 
For the purposes of this Article, Ôdetermined areaŐ means the area for which all of the conditions laid down in the rules have been met.
Der tages sžrskilt hensyn til foderarealer, til arealer i forbindelse med jordudtagningen og til arealer med de forskellige markafgrżder, for hvilke der anvendes en anden stżttesats. 
Forage areas, set-aside areas and each arable crop area for which a different aid rate is applicable shall be treated exclusively and separately.
Bemžrk: Det er ikke defineret i forordningen, hvad der skal betragtes som grov uagtsomhed og urigtige angivelser. 
Note: The Regulation does not indicate what is to be considered as serious negligence and what is to be considered as false declaration.
Sdanne afgżrelser afhžnger derfor af de involverede myndigheders skżn og de gžldende nationale regler. 
The corresponding decision is therefore based on the judgment of the administrations concerned in line with the national rules.
DYR (artikel 10) Gžlder der et individuelt loft, reduceres det antal dyr, der er anfżrt i stżtteansżgningen, til det antal, der er fastsat som loft for den pgžldende bedrift. 
ANIMALS (Article 10) Where an individual limit or individual ceiling is applicable the number of animals shown in aid applications shall be reduced to the limit or ceiling set for the farmer concerned.
Hvis det antal dyr, der er angivet i en stżtteansżgning, overstiger det antal, der fastsls under kontrollen, beregnes stżttebelżbet p grundlag af det fastslede antal dyr. 
If the number of animals declared in an aid application exceeds that found during checks the aid shall be calculated on the number of animals found.
Medmindre der foreligger force majeure, og efter fradrag af de dyr, som er dżde af naturlige rsager, nedsžttes enhedsbelżbet for stżtten: C 214/31 
However, except in cases of force majeure and after deduction of animals dead due to natural circumstances, the unit amount of the aid shall be reduced: C 214/31
C 214/32 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 31.7.2001 a) b) Hvis ansżgningen omfatter hżjst 20 dyr, sker nedsžttelsen sledes: Ń hvis overskridelsen er p to dyr eller derunder, er nedsžttelsen lig med den procent, der svarer til overskridelsen Ń hvis overskridelsen er p over to, men hżjst p fire dyr, er nedsžttelsen lig med to gange den procent, der svarer til overskridelsen. Er overskridelsen p over fire dyr, ydes der ingen stżtte. I andre tilfžlde sker nedsžttelsen sledes: Ń hvis overskridelsen er p hżjst 5 %, er nedsžttelsen lig med den procent, der svarer til overskridelsen Ń hvis overskridelsen er p over 5 %, men p hżjst 20 %, er nedsžttelsen lig med to gange den procent, der svarer til overskridelsen. 
C 214/32 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 (a) in cases where an application concerns a maximum of 20 animals: Ń by the percentage corresponding to the difference found if this is not more than two animals, Ń by twice the percentage corresponding to the difference found if this is more than two but not more than four animals. If the difference is greater than four animals, no aid shall be granted; (b) in other cases: Ń by the percentage corresponding to the difference found if this is not more than 5 %, Ń by twice the percentage if the difference found is more than 5 % but not more than 20 %.
Er overskridelsen p over 20 %, ydes der ingen stżtte. 
If the difference found is more than 20 % no aid shall be granted.
Procenterne i litra a) beregnes p grundlag af det antal, der ansżges om stżtte for, og procenterne i litra b) p grundlag af det fastslede antal. 
The percentages mentioned under (a) are calculated on the basis of the number declared, and those mentioned under (b) on the basis of the number found.
Hvis der imidlertid er tale om urigtige angivelser, som er forsžtlige eller skyldes grov uagtsomhed: Ń udelukkes landbrugeren fra den stżtteordning, der er tale om, i det pgžldende kalenderr, og Ń hvis der er tale om en forsžtlig urigtig angivelse, fra samme stżtteordning det fżlgende kalenderr. 
However, where it is found that a false declaration was made intentionally or as a result of serious negligence: Ń the farmer in question shall be excluded from the aid scheme concerned for the calendar year in question, and Ń in the case of a false declaration made intentionally, from the same aid scheme for the following calendar year.
Kilde: Kommissionens forordning (EŻF) nr. 3887/92, som žndret. 
Source: Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92, as amended.
31.7.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 214/33 RESUM I. Reformen i 1992 af den fžlles landbrugspolitik dannede en skillelinje i den mde, som EFŐs landbrugsstżtte blev forvaltet p, med et skifte fra prisstżtte til direkte betalinger til landmžndene. 
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/33 SUMMARY I. The 1992 reforms of the CAP represented a watershed in the way Community support for agriculture was managed, with a shift from price support to direct payments to farmers.
Dette forżgede antallet af stżttemodtagere, men ogs risikoen for uregelmžssigheder og svig, og derfor omfattede reformpakken ogs bestemmelser om, at hver medlemsstat skulle opbygge et integreret forvaltnings-og kontrolsystem (IFKS) for direkte betalinger. 
This increased the number of beneficiaries but also the risk of irregularity and fraud and therefore the reform package also included provisions for each Member State to set up an integrated administration and control system (IACS) for direct payments.
IFKS tager sigte p at kontrollere alle stżtteansżgninger fra individuelle producenter. 
The IACS aims to cover all aid applications from individual producers.
Dette forbedrer effektiviteten af behandlingen af stżtteansżgningerne og kontrollen af udbetalingerne. 
This improves efficiency in processing aid applications and checks on payments.
Under IFKS er medlemsstaterne forpligtet til at oprette edb-databaser for at muliggżre edb-krydskontrol og kontrol p stedet. 
Under the IACS, Member States are obliged to set up computerised databases to enable electronic cross-checks and on-the-spot checks of holdings.
For at denne type kontrol kan virke efter hensigten har det ogs vžret nżdvendigt at indfżre et nyt system for at identificere arealer og identificere og registrere dyr s vel som at indlžse oplysninger om hver stżttemodtagers stżtteansżgning. 
For this type of check to work, it has also been necessarytosetupanewsystemtoidentifylandandidentifyand register animals, as well as to record details of every beneficiaryŐs applications for aid.
Luftfotografier og satellitter anvendes til at kortlžgge arealer og kontrollere anvendelsen af arealerne. 
Aerial photographs and satellites are used to map land surfaces and verify land use.
Observationer under kontrolbesżg og p ekspertmżder har vist, at IFKS er et udmžrket instrument til at indsamle plidelige data om situationen p stedet og kontrollere stżtteansżgningerne IV. 
Observations made during inspections and in meetings of experts have shown that the IACS has proved to be an excellent instrument for gathering reliable data on the situation in the field and for conducting checks on aid applications. IV.
Efter at Kommissionen havde vedtaget lovrammen for afholdelse af udgifter til IFKS og udstukket retningslinjer for medlemsstaterne om deres IFKS, overvgede den p nžrt hold arbejdet med at opbygge systemet for at afslżre eventuelle mangler i systemet, s medlemsstaterne kunne tage skridt til at lżse de konstaterede problemer. 
Having set out the regulatory framework for incurring expenditure under the IACS and providing guidelines and advice to Member States on their IAC systems, the Commission closely monitored the work which allowed any shortcomings in the operation of the system to be identified so that the Member States could take the steps needed to remedy them.
Hvis en medlemsstats IFKS viser sig at vžre utilfredsstillende, afviser Kommissionen under regnskabsafslutningen at finansiere alle de pgžldende udgifter eller en del af dem. 
If the IAC systems put into place by a Member State prove to be unsatisfactory, the Commission refuses, under the clearance-of-accounts procedure, to finance all or part of the expenditure concerned.
Kompetencen for IFKS sorterer under GD AGRIŐs direktorat for regnskabsafslutning, der arbejder tžt sammen med GD AGRIŐs juridiske tjeneste og tjenester for markedsordninger, s vel som under GD SANCO. 
The competence for the IACS lies with DG AGRIŐs Clearance-of-Accounts Directorate, which operates in close cooperation with the DG AGRI legal and market services, as well as DG SANCO.
V. De mangfoldige markedsordninger viser IFKSŐ betydning for en harmonisering af kontrollen. 
V. The fact that there is such a diversity of market regulations emphasises the importance of the IACS in ensuring a harmonisation of controls.
Nr det erkendes, at ikke alle implementeringer er helt tilfredsstillende, skal mangfoldigheden af medlemsstaternes vaner, traditioner samt forvaltnings-og rets-systemer tages i betragtning. 
While recognising that not all implementations are totally satisfactory, the diversity of Member StatesŐ customs, traditions and existing administrative and legal systems must be taken into account.
Det er ogs vigtigt at ppege, at medlemsstaterne kan beslutte at g videre end de lovhjemlede minimumskrav. 
It is also important to point out that Member Statesmaydecidetogobeyondtheminimumlegislativerequire-ments.
Derfor vil der helt naturligt opst visse forskelle i praksis medlemsstaterne imellem. 
Therefore, certain differences in practice between Member States are bound to occur.
Mange af de žndringer, som Revisionsretten henviste til, var af mindre omfang, og stżrstedelen vedrżrte žndringer p grund af markedsforvaltningen. 
Many of the amendments referred to by the Court were minor and the great majority relate to changes made for reasons of market management.
Kommissionen er enig i, at nogle medlemsstater undlod at fremlžgge nogle oplysninger korrekt og rettidigt. 
The Commission agrees that some Member States have failed to supply some information in a correct and timely fashion.
I forbindelse med markafgrżder og dyrepržmier har Kommissionen allerede identificeret, hvilke oplysninger den behżver, og udstukket retningslinjer til medlemsstaterne i s henseende. 
In relation to the arable crops and animal premium sectors, the Commission has already identified which information it needs and issued clear guidelines to Member States in this regard.
Der blev allerede i midten af 2000 taget store skridt til at forbedre fremlžggelsen af oplysninger om dyrepržmier. 
Significant steps to improve the supply of information in the animal premium sector had been taken by mid-2000.
Nżdvendigheden af, at medlemsstaterne fremlžgger statistiske oplysninger rettidigt, blev ogs fastsat i en retsakt fra 2000. 
The need for statistical information from Member States to be supplied punctu-ally has also been stipulated on a regulatory basis as from 2000.
Revisionsretten beskriver i generelle vendinger de mangler i hovedkontrollen, der blev afslżret i nogle medlemsstater. 
The Court describes in general terms the main control deficiencies established in some Member States.
Kommissionen er enig i, at selv i de medlemsstater, hvor IFKS er indfżrt, bestr der stadig svagheder, og disse svagheder udlżser korrektioner ved regnskabsafslutningen. 
The Commission agrees that, even for those Member States where the IACS has been implemented, weaknesses still exist and are treated accordingly in the context of the clearance-of-accounts procedure.
Revisionsrettens anbefalinger om forvaltning og forenkling af reglerne mžrkes, men det skal nžvnes, at der i de fleste tilfžlde allerede er truffet passende foranstaltninger. 
The CourtŐ s recommendations on management and simplification of the rules are noted, but it must be mentioned that for the most part suitable action has already been instigated.
Af sžrlig betydning i denne forbindelse er den igangvžrende revision af den bestende IFKS-lovgivning i lyset af den erfaring, der er indhżstet siden indledningen af reformen af den fžlles landbrugspolitik i 2000. 
Of particular importance in this context is the current review of existing IACS legislation in the light of experience gained since the CAP reform introduced from 2000.
DET INTEGREREDE SYSTEMS STRUKTUR Systemet til identifikation af marker 15. 
DESIGN OF THE INTEGRATED SYSTEM The identification system for agricultural parcels 15.
Revisionsretten beskriver de forskellige systemer i de forskellige medlemsstater. 
The Court describes the different systems in place in various Member States.
C 214/34 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 31.7.2001 Medlemsstaterne har forskellige vaner, traditioner og forvaltnings-og retssystemer, der naturligvis fżrer til forskellig praksis som skitseret af Revisionsretten. 
THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES C 214/34 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 Member States have diverse customs, traditions and existing legal and administrative systems that naturally lead to the different approaches outlined by the Court.
Nr det indrżmmes, at ikke alle implementeringer er helt tilfredsstillende, m mangfoldigheden af medlemsstaternes systemer ogs erkendes og tages i betragtning, nr de vurderes under regnskabsafslutningen. 
While recognising that not all implementations are totally satisfactory, the diversity of Member StatesŐ existing systems must also be acknowledged, and taken into account when assessments are made under the clearance-of-accounts procedure.
Det ville desuden uden en sdan holdning have vžret umuligt at indfżre et effektivt kontrolinstrument s hurtigt Medlemsstaterne kan beslutte at g videre end de lovhjemlede minimumskrav. 
Moreover, without such an approach, it would have been impossible to install a quality control tool so rapidly.
Derfor vil der helt naturligt opst visse forskelle i praksis medlemsstaterne imellem. 
As Member States may decide to go beyond the minimum legislative requirements, certain differences in practice between the Member States are bound to occur.
Det integrerede forvaltnings-og kontrolsystem Sanktioner 32. 
The integrated control system Sanctions 32.
1678/98 med virkning fra den 1. januar 1999 isžr for at tage hensyn til de žndringer i identifikation og registrering af kvžg, der blev indfżrt ved Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 820/97. a) Det er ogs nżdvendigt at nžvne de ofte meget fuldstžndige oplysninger, som medlemsstaterne sender Kommissionen om deres gennemfżrelse af markedsordningerne, dvs. retningslinjer for inspektżrer og producenter, standarddokumentation osv. 
The rules on sanctions in respect of bovine premium schemes were significantly changed and clarified by amending Regulation (EC) No 1678/98 with effect from 1 January 1999, in particular totakeintoaccountthechangestobovineidentificationandreg-istration introduced by Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97. (a) It is necessary also to mention the often very complete information supplied to the Commission by Member States with regard to their implementation of market schemes, i.e. guidelines to controllers and producers, standard documentation, etc.
Disse oplysninger gennemgs systematisk. 
This information is systematically subjected to scrutiny.
Det erindres ogs om, at Revisionsretten i sin omtalte sžrberetning nr. 22/2000 var rosende i sin omtale af IFKS. 
It is also recalled that, in its Special Report No 22/2000 as referred to, the Court was complimentary in its views on the IACS.
De vžsentligste revisionsresultater p kommissionsniveau Generelle organisatoriske rammer Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug (GD AGRI) 41. 
Main findings at Commission level General organisational background The Agriculture Directorate-General (DG AGRI) 41.
Ansvaret for IFKS sorterer under GD AGRIŐs direktorat for regnskabsafslutning, der arbejder tžt sammen med GD AGRIŐs juridiske tjeneste og tjenester for markedsordninger, s vel som under GD SANCO. 
The competence for the IACS lies with DG AGRIŐs Clearance-of-Accounts Directorate, which operates in close cooperation with the DG AGRI legal and market services, as well as DG SANCO.
Generaldirektoratet for Sundhed og Forbrugerbeskyttelse (GD SANCO) 42. a) Obligatorisk udveksling af oplysninger om forhold, der afslżres under kontrolbesżg, mellem de nationale veterinžrmyndigheder og IFKS-tjenesterne er fastsat i lovgivningen (jf. forordning (EF) nr. 1678/98, der trdte i kraft i 1999). 
The Health-and-Consumer-Protection Directorate-General (DG SANCO) 42. (a) The obligatory exchange of inspection findings between the national veterinary and the IACS services is covered by legislation (see Regulation (EC) No 1678/98, which became applicable in 1999).
Effektiviteten af dette samarbejde overvges af GD AGRI. b) Revisionsretten ptaler de forskellige grader af fremskridt, som medlemsstaterne har gjort for at oprette databaser til identifikation og registrering af kvžg. 
The effectiveness of this cooperation is audited by DG AGRI. (b) The Court points out the differing progress made by Member States in setting up databases for bovine identification and registration.
Fremskridtene med hensyn til oprettelse af databaser i alle medlemsstater blev fulgt og kontrolleret af GD AGRI og GD SANCO i 1999 og 2000. 
Progress on databases in all Member States was monitored and audited by DG AGRI and DG SANCO throughout 1999 and 2000.
Europa-Parlamentets og Rdets vedtagelse af den nye forordning (EF) nr. 
The adoption of new Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 has not basically changed the situation; however the 1 January 2000 deadline set for recognition by the Commission of the fully operational character of the national database for bovine animals has been deleted.
3887/92 om det integrerede forvaltnings-og kontrolsystem synes stort, skal det bemžrkes, at mange žndringer isžr for forordning (EŻF) nr. 3508/92 var meget sm. Da markedsreglerne lżbende er blevet žndret p linje med politikken p omrdet, blev žndringerne af kontrolreglerne uundgeligt udlżst af udviklingen i markedsordningerne. 
Although there appears to be a plethora of regulations amending Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 and Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 on the integrated administration and control system, many of the amendments were very minor, particularly for Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92. Moreover, as market rules have been regularly changed in line with policy, amendments of the control rules were inevitably driven by market-scheme requirements.
Ledelsesinformation 39. 
Management information 39.
Medlemsstaterne giver ikke altid oplysningerne i fuldt omfang eller rettidigt, hvilket forhindrer planlžgning af kontrolbesżg. 
Information from Member States is not always supplied in complete or timely fashion, thus hindering mission-planning.