natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C 303/22 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 7.12.2004 Tabel 4 Programmer, revisionen omfattede EF-interventions-program Ems-Dollart-omrdet (D og NL) Alpeomrdet (F og I) Irland-Wales (IRL og UK) Spanien-Portugal (E og P) Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein (A, D, CH og LI) Nordvesteuropa (B, D, F, IRL, L, NL og UK) Det vestlige Middelhav (E, F, I, P og UK) Nordżstlige omrde (DK, D, SF og S) Type Ń EFRU-belżb Linje A Ń 35,4 millioner euro Linje A Ń 63,3 millioner euro Linje A Ń 47,6 millioner euro Linje A Ń 806,9 millioner euro To delprogrammer er udvalgt til et EFRU-belżb p 330,2 millioner euro Linje A Ń 17,5 millioner euro Linje B Ń 329,7 millioner euro Linje B Ń 103,8 millioner euro Linje C Ń 32,8 millioner euro Sžrlige forhold lille program bjergomrde kystomrder det stżrste program Det stżtteberettigede omrdes areal i 1 000 km2 19 45 27 137 27 lille program tvžrnational linje 787 tvžrnational linje 545 tvžrregional linje ikke relevant (1) (1) EUŐs omrde er delt i fire, og hver enkelt del džkkes af et EF-initiativ-program under linje C. Den eneste betingelse, der skal vžre opfyldt, for, at alle udgifterne til et projekt konteres under et bestemt EF-initiativ-program, er, at projektlederen bor i det omrde, der er stżtteberettiget under EF-initiativ-programmet, ogs selv om de żvrige partnere eventuelt bor uden for det stżtteberettigede omrde. 
C 303/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 CIP Ems-Dollart Region (D and NL) Alps (F and I) Ireland-Wales (IRL and UK) Spain-Portugal (E and P) Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein (A, D, CH and LI) North-West Europe (NWE) (B, D, F, IRL, L, NL, UK) Western Mediterranean (MEDOCC) (E, F, I, P, UK) North zone (ZN) (DK, D, S, SF) Type Đ ERDF budget Strand A Ń 35,4 million euro Strand A Ń 63,3 million euro Strand A Ń 47,6 million euro Strand A Ń 806,9 million euro Two subprogrammes adopted with an ERDF budget of around 330,2 million euro Strand A Ń 17,5 million euro Strand B Ń 329,7 million euro Strand B Ń 103,8 million euro Strand C Ń 32,8 million euro Specific context Surface area of eligible area (in 1 000 km2) Table 4 Programmes examined as part of the audit Smaller programme 19 Mountainous region 45 Maritime region 27 Largest programme 137 Smaller programme 27 Transnational programme 787 Transnational programme 545 Interregional programme not relevant (1) (1) The territory of the Union is divided into four parts, each covered by a CIP in Strand C. If the lead manager for a project is resident in the eligible area of the CIP, all the project expenditure is booked to that CIP, even though the other partners may be resident outside that eligible area.
Det stżtteberettigede omrdes areal er sledes ikke relevant. 
The surface area of the eligible area is thus not a relevant data item.
7.12.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 303/23 Alpeomrdet (linje A) At bidrage til bžredygtig udvikling af det gržnseoverskridende omrde ved nedbrydning af hindringer, der skyldes gržnsen 1. 
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/23 Alps (Strand A) To contribute to the sustainable develop-1. ment of the cross-border area by reducing 2. the obstacles created by the presence of a border.
Forżgelse af beskžftigelsesmulighe-derne 1. 
Increase in job opportunities 1.
Fžlles fysisk forvaltning med henblik p bžredygtig udvikling Eksempelvis skal sidstnžvnte delml mles af effektindikatorerne: Irland-Wales (linje A) At opn en bžredygtig udvikling gennem gradvis integration af den lokale żkonomiske, sociale og miljżmžssige udvikling i en region, som er fremadrettet og er attraktiv, fordi den kan tilbyde livskvalitet, rimelige sociale og miljżmžssige vilkr og gode kom-munikationsnet; at opbygge en region, der er godt rustet til at klare konkurrencen i en global żkonomi. 
Joint spatial management with a view to sustainable development Fostering a sense of cross-border iden-1. tity in the context of European citizen-Ireland-Wales (Strand A) Achieving sustainable development, by a progressive integration of local economic, social and environmental development, of a region which is forward-looking and attractive in terms of its quality of life, social equity, environment and its communication links; establishing a region geared to the needs of competing in a global economy.
Mlene skal ns gennem intensivering af forbindelserne mellem den offentlige, den private og den frivillige sektor med henblik p at f skabt kvalitetsarbejds-pladser i en moderne żkonomi. 
This will be achieved by developing the relationship between the public, private and voluntary sectors to help create quality jobs in a modern economy.
Ń 1. 
Ń 1.
At fremme żkonomisk, social og teknisk udvikling i det gržnseoverskridende omrde Eksempelvis skal det fżrste delml mles af resultatindikatorerne: 1. 
To encourage the economic, social and technical development of the cross-border area For example, the first sub-objective should be measured against result indicators: 1.
Bruttoantal skabte og bevarede arbejds-De valgte indikatorer kan ikke mle, om det overordnede ml eller delmlene er opfyldt. 
Gross number of jobs created or saved 2. Number of people attending training The chosen indicators cannot be used to measure the extent to which the overall objective or the sub-objectives have been achieved.
Tabel 5 Eksempler p indikatorer, der skal mle effekten eller resultatet (1) af programmerne som helhed Tabellen viser eksempler p indikatorer for de otte reviderede EF-initiativ-programmer, der skal mle den samlede effekt eller det samlede resultat af programmerne og/eller effekten eller resultatet af delml. 
Table 5 Examples of indicators designed to measure the overall impact (1) or results of programmes The table comprises, for the eight CIPs audited, examples of the indicators that are deemed to measure their impact or results, overall and/or at the level of sub-objectives.
Der findes ogs resultatindikatorer p lavere programniveauer. 
Result indicators also exist at lower CIP levels.
De giver supplerende oplysninger, men som det nžvnes i punkt 75, beskrives det ikke, hvordan de skal aggregeres p hżjere programniveauer. 
While they will provide additional information, as mentioned in paragraph 75 there is no indication how they are to be consolidated at higher levels.
EF-initiativ-program Overordnet ml Mling af den samlede effekt eller det samlede resultat Prioriteter eller interventionsakser eller delml Mling af effekten eller resultatet Ems-Dollart-omrdet (linje A) At fremme varig żkonomisk og social integration og udviklingen Ems-Dollart-omrdet, s det menneskelige og żkonomiske potentiale samt naturrigdommene, der p grund af gržnsen ikke udnyttes i dag, udnyttes optimalt Ń 1. 
Ems-Dollart Region (Strand A) To promote sustainable economic and social integration and the development of the Ems-Dollart Region, so as to make optimum use of the human, economic and natural potential that is currently unused due to the existence of the border. Ń 1. 2.
At fremme den menneskelige kontakt Resultatindikatorer: 1. 
Promotion of qualitative growth Result indicators: 1.
Antal projekter 2. 
Number of projects 2.
Antal netvžrk 3. 
Number of networks 3.
Antal partnere 4. 
Number of partners 4.
Antal oprettede og bevarede stillinger 5. 
Number of jobs created or saved 5.
Antal personer, der har lžrt nabolandets 2. 
Number of people who have learned level 3.
Projektets holdbarhed kationspotentialet 6. 
Exploitation of IT potential 6.
At fremme mobilitet og adgangen til omrdet 2. 
Promotion of mobility and access language of neighbouring country 6.
At opn bžredygtig vžkst ved at forbedre kvaliteten generelt i det gržnseoverskridende omrde pladser 2. 
To achieve sustainable growth by enhancing the overall quality of the cross-border area courses 3.
Procentsatsen for projekter, der vedrżrer it og kommunikationsteknologi Det andet delml skal mles p: 1. 
Proportion of projects that are IT-related For the second subobjective: 1.
Antal fžlles kulturarrangementer 2. 
Number of shared cultural events 2.
Antal fžlles hav-og miljżundersżgelser 
Number of marine and environmental
C 303/24 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 7.12.2004 EF-initiativ-program Overordnet ml Mling af den samlede effekt eller det samlede resultat Prioriteter eller interventionsakser eller delml Mling af effekten eller resultatet Spanien-Portugal (linje A) At fremme en harmonisk og afbalanceret udvikling af de gržnseoverskridende omrder gennem en lang ržkke foranstaltninger, der skal give de gržnseoverskridende omrder med perifer żkonomi en bedre position i EF-medlemsstaterne Ń 15 specifikke ml samlet under fire inter-ventionsakser. 
C 303/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 Spain-Portugal (Strand A) Promoting harmonious and balanced development in border regions by means of a wide variety of opportunities for changing attitudes towards the cross-border area, with the peripheral economies, among the Member States of the European Community. Ń 15 specific objectives grouped into four priorities.
Eksempelvis er mlene for den fżrste akse: 1. 
For example, the objectives of the first priority are: 1.
At fremme den żkonomiske integra-Der var fastlagt fżlgende effektindikatorer for den fżrste akse: 1. 
To encourage economic integration In the case of the first priority the following impact indicators were adopted: 1.
Person-og varestrżmme 2. 
Flows of persons and goods 2.
Kloaknettets džkningsgrad Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein (linje A) At fremme en bžredygtig udvikling af regionen og etablere og intensivere gržnseoverskridende netvžrk Resultatindikatorer: 1. 
Result indicators: 1.
Antal stżttede projekter 2. 
Number of 2.
Antal undersżgelser af og dokumenter 1. 
Number of 1.
Żkonomisk udvikling 2. 
Economic development 2.
Sociokulturel udvikling De valgte resultatindikatorer for hver prioritet sigter mod mling af antallet af projekter p bestemte omrder, som f.eks. antallet af projekter, der sigter mod at fremme regionen, og antallet af projekter vedrżrende innovations-overfżrsel Nordvesteuropa (linje B) At bidrage til en mere sammenhžngende, afbalanceret og bžredygtig udvikling af EUŐs territorium, og isžr af Nordvesteuropa gennem innovativt og integreret tvžrnationalt samarbejde om territoriale spżrgsml Resultatindikatorer: 1. 
Environmental and spatial develop-The result indicators adopted for each priority seek to measure the number of projects in certain fields, e.g. the number of projects that aim to promote the region and the number of projects in the field of innovation transfer. The overall objective is wide and accompanied by numerous sub-objectives.
Indikatorerne er utilstržkkelige, fordi mlene er s omfattende. 
The indicators are insufficient, given the scale of the objectives.
Mlene er meget generelle og indikatorerne kan ikke mle, om de er opfyldt. om grundlžggende planlžgning 4. 
The objectives are very general and the indicators cannot be used to measure them. assisted 3. Number of documents 4.
Antal stżttede net 5. 
Number of 5.
Antal projekter vedrżrende forbedring af infrastrukturerne forvaltningen af omrdet 3. Antal permanente netvžrk af beskžfti-bindelse til den żvrige verden 2. at bidrage til omrdets samhżrighed intern) 2. 
Number of transnational spatial man-external) 2. Development of modes of transport agement documents 3. Number of permanent networks of between NWE and the rest of the employees created in the public and corridorsŐ 3.
Antal innovative metoder 5. 
Number of innovative approaches 5.
Antal tvžrnationale samarbejdsnet 6. 
Number of transnational cooperation private sectors 4.
Der er mange delml. Der er fastlagt indikatorer, men det er vanskeligt at styre dem, fordi der er s mange. tion og integrationen af markederne 2. 
Corresponding indicators have been defined, but in view of the number involved, they are difficult to handle. and market integration 2.
At żge investeringsstrżmmene og at 3. 
To increase the flow of investment, area 3.
Jernbaneforbindelser og andre forbindelser mellem de vigtigste bycentre udbygge de żkonomiske forbindelser, og de to landes gensidige turisme 3. 
Rail and other connections between economic relations and visitors main urban centres between the two countries 3.
At planlžgge udnyttelsen af omrderne med henblik p at forbedre deres konkurrenceevne 4. 
To plan the use of the territory in order to increase its competitiveness, 4.
At fremme integrationen af omrdet og udviklingen af landomrderne 
To promote territorial integration and the development of rural areas world 2.
7.12.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 303/25 EF-initiativ-program Overordnet ml Mling af den samlede effekt eller det samlede resultat Prioriteter eller interventionsakser eller delml Mling af effekten eller resultatet Det vestlige Middelhav (linje B) At żge Medoc-omrdets samlede konkurren-ceevne; at styrke samarbejdsomrdets samhżrighed ved at gżre udviklingsstrategierne for omrdet mere sammenhžngende gennem en mere omfattende interinstitutionel integration; med henblik p vedvarende udvikling at fremme og igangsžtte et mere frugtbart og mere omfattende tvžrnationalt samarbejde mellem de europžiske regioner, der er stżtteberettigede under programmet, og med tredjelande ved Middelhavets sydlige bred Resultatindikatorer: 1. 
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/25 Western Mediterranean (Strand B) To increase territorial competitiveness throughout the Mdoc area; strengthen the cohesion of the cooperational area by making land development policies more consistent through enhanced interinstitutional integration; to foster and initiate richer, more numerous, transnational cooperation initiatives with a view to sustainable development on the scale of the European regions eligible for the programme, and with the non-member countries on the southern shores of the Mediterranean.
Antal involverede organer 2. Antal gennemfżrte strategiske analyser 4 prioriterede akser: Eksempler p resultatindikatorer for akse 1: Nordżstlige omrde (linje C) At effektivisere regionaludviklings-og sam-Ń hżrighedsstrategierne og -redskaberne ved at etablere netvžrk, isžr i regioner med udviklings-og omstillingsefterslžb Ń Ń Det overordnede ml er meget bredt og kan ikke mles med de valgte indikatorer. 
Number of organisations involved in Four priorities: Examples of result indicators for priority 1: North (Strand C) Improving the effectiveness of regional Ń development and cohesion policies and tools through the creation of networks, especially for the regions whose development is lag-Ń Ń CIP Overall objective Measure of overall impact or result Priority or sub-objective Measure of impact or result The overall objective is very broad and cannot be measured by means of the indicators adopted. ging behind and the reconversion regions.
Mlene for linje C og EF-initiativ-programmerne under linje C er endnu ikke defineret godt nok. 
The Strand C objectives and CIPs have not yet been adequately defined.
(1) ČEffektenÇ er virkningerne p lang sigt, ČresultatetÇ er de direkte og umiddelbare virkninger. 
(1) The term ÔimpactŐ refers to long-term effects, while ÔresultsŐ are direct and immediate. projects 2.
Middelhavsbžkkenet Strategi for territorial udvikling og bysystemer Transportsystemer og informationssamfundet Miljż, bevarelse og fremme af kulturarven og vedvarende udvikling Ń Ń Antal finansierede planlžgningspro-grammer for Middelhavsomrdet Antal aftaler mellem samfund p de to Middelhavskyster Ń 
Mediterranean basin Regional development strategy and urban systems Transport systems and information society Environment, heritage promotion and sustainable development Ń Ń Number of projects to develop the Mediterranean area being financed Number of agreements between authorities on the two shores of the Mediterranean carried out 3.
C 303/26 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 7.12.2004 S I G o i g e R Kilde: Interreg IIIA programms (2000-2006) Canarias (E) 1. 
C 303/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 S I G o i g e R Interreg IIIA programms (2000-2006) Canarias (E) 1.
52 0 100 500km Š EuroGeographics Association for the administrative boundaries 12 8 22. 
52 0 100 500km Š EuroGeographics Association for the administrative boundaries 44 12 8 22.
7 Guadeloupe Martinique Runion 2 4 16. 
7 Guadeloupe Martinique Runion 2 4 16.
48 49 Kort 1 (F) (F) Guyane (F) (F) Madeira (P) Aores (P) 20. 
48 49 Map 1 (F) (F) Guyane (F) (F) Madeira (P) Aores (P) 20.
7.12.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende Kort 2 Interreg IIIB (2000-2006): Cooperation areas C 303/27 Northern Periphery North Sea Baltic Sea North West Europe Atlantic Area CADSES South West Europe Western Mediterranean Alpine Space Northern Periphery North West Europe South West Europe North Sea Atlantic Area Archimed Non-E.U. areas are indicative only. 
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union Map 2 Interreg IIIB (2000-2006): Cooperation areas C 303/27 Northern Periphery North Sea Baltic Sea North West Europe Atlantic Area CADSES South West Europe Western Mediterranean Alpine Space Northern Periphery North West Europe South West Europe North Sea Atlantic Area Archimed Non-E.U. areas are indicative only.
Š EuroGeographics Association for the administrative boundaries S G I R e g i o Kilde: Kommissionen, GD REGIO. 
Š EuroGeographics Association for the administrative boundaries S G I R e g i o Source: Commission, DG REGIO.
Western Mediterranean Caribbean Area Aores, Madeira, Canarias Area Indian Ocean Area Aores - Madeira - Canarias Area Caribbean Area 0 100 500 km 0 100 500 km 0 100 500 km 0 100 500 km Baltic Sea CADSES Alpine Space Archimed 0 100 500 km 0 50 250 km 0 100 500 km 0 100 500 km 0 100 500 km Indian Ocean Area 0 100 500 km 
Western Mediterranean Caribbean Area Aores, Madeira, Canarias Area Indian Ocean Area Aores - Madeira - Canarias Area Caribbean Area 0 100 500 km 0 100 500 km 0 100 500 km 0 100 500 km Baltic Sea CADSES Alpine Space Archimed 0 100 500 km 0 50 250 km 0 100 500 km 0 100 500 km 0 100 500 km Indian Ocean Area 0 100 500 km
C 303/28 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 7.12.2004 S I G R e g i o INTERREG IIIC (2000-2006) South West North East North East South West Kilde: Kommissionen, GD REGIO. 
C 303/28 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 S I G R e g i o INTERREG IIIC (2000-2006) South West North East North East South West Source: Commission, DG REGIO.
Kort 3 Canarias (E) Guadeloupe Martinique Runion (F) (F) Madeira (P) (F) Guyane (F) Aores (P) INTERREG IIIC 0 100 500km Š EuroGeographics Association for the administrative boundaries 
Map 3 Canarias (E) Guadeloupe Martinique Runion (F) (F) Madeira (P) (F) Guyane (F) Aores (P) INTERREG IIIC 0 100 500km Š EuroGeographics Association for the administrative boundaries
7.12.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 303/29 KOMMISSIONENS SVAR RESUM III. 
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/29 THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES SUMMARY III.
Kommissionen har i overensstemmelse med det prioriterede ml om at oprette gržnseoverskridende żkonomiske og sociale centre valgt at basere sine retningslinjer p et Čbottom-upÇ-princip, fordi antallet af gržnseoverskridende programmer er s stort, og de berżrte omrder s forskellige. 
In view of the large number of cross-border programmes, the many different types of area concerned and the priority objective of developing cross-border economic and social centres, the Commission opted in its guidelines for a bottom-up approach.
Dette er grunden til, at retningslinjerne for linje A og C omfatter forholdsvis brede og ikke-udtżmmende prioriterede omrder. 
This is why the guidelines for strands A and C refer to the priority areas in relatively broad and non-exhaustive terms.
Fordelen ligger i, at der udvikles forskellige former for gržnseoverskridende samarbejde med deraf fżlgende katalysatoreffekt. 
The added value is to be found in the development of cross-border cooperation and in the catalyst effect this produces.
Formlet med indikatorerne er at mle de fremskridt, der er gjort p omrdet. 
The indicators should measure progress made in this field.
Det har imidlertid vžret vanskeligt at fastlžgge mlrettede indikatorer, da mange af foranstaltningerne er af immateriel karakter. 
However, the intangible nature of a great many operations made it difficult to devise targeted indicators.
De vigtigste aktżrer havde kendskab til de generelle retningslinjer og var i regelmžssig kontakt med Kommissionen, lžnge inden retningslinjerne blev offentliggjort. 
The main actors were familiar with the general points of the guidelines, and the Commission had been in regular contact with them well before the guidelines were published.
Forsinkelserne opstod hovedsagelig, fordi det tog tid at rette op p disse svagheder, da det var nżdvendigt at indhente tilladelse fra alle de berżrte medlemsstater. 
The delays were largely due to the time taken to remedy these shortcomings given the need to secure the agreement of all the Member States concerned.
Dette har kun i begržnset omfang forsinket programmerne. 
The delays had little impact on the start-up of the programmes.
V. Det vil gżre det lettere at gennemfżre samarbejdsprogram-merne, hvis der oprettes fžlles forvaltningsstrukturer med status som juridisk person. 
V. The creation of genuine joint management structures with their own legal personality would facilitate implementation of cooperation programmes.
I sin tredje rapport om żkonomisk og social samhżrighed meddeler Kommissionen, at den vil fremlžgge et forslag for Rdet om et nyt juridisk instrument, der skal danne struktur for det europžiske samarbejde. 
In its third report on economic and social cohesion the Commission announced that it intended to propose to the Council a new legal instrument, in the form of a European cooperation structure.
Med Čbottom-upÇ-princippet kan man finde frem til problemer, der ikke kan identificeres ved ekspertanalyser, men som ppeges af de regionale og lokale myndigheder, der er med til at fastlžgge strategier og prioriteter. 
The bottom-up approach brings out concerns not identified by expert analysis but expressed by regional and local authorities which feed into the strategy and choice of priorities.
Det overordnede ml for de gržnseoverskridende EF-initiativprogrammer er at medvirke til at oprette gržnseoverskridende żkonomiske og sociale centre, og alle projekter, der fremmer samarbejdet p dette omrde, kan bidrage til at n dette ml. 
As the overall objective of the cross-border CIPs is to contribute to the development of cross-border economic and social centres, any project which facilitates cooperation on this point can participate in the objective.
Kommissionen erkender, at det er svžrt at finde passende indikatorer, fordi Interreg-initiativets mervžrdieffekt kan antage vidt forskellige former. 
The Commission recognises that there is a difficulty in finding suitable indicators due to the fact that the added value of the Interreg Initiative takes a variety of forms.
De sžt af indikatorer, der er udviklet i forbindelse med hvert enkelt Interreg III-program, er imidlertid et lovende skridt i denne retning. 
The sets of indicators in individual Interreg III programmes are, however, a promising start in this direction.
Kommissionen har opfordret medlemsstaterne til at indfżre edb-systemer til at forvalte projekterne og databaser til at indsamle oplysninger om indikatorerne. 
The Commission encouraged Member States to put in place IT project management systems and databases to compile information for use with indicators.
Kommissionen har ofte p grundlag af konklusionerne af midtvejsevalueringerne insisteret p, at programmernes forvaltningsmyndigheder forbedrer indikatorsystemerne. 
After the mid-term assessments, the Commission urged many programme management authorities to improve the systems of indicators.
Som et led i forenklingsindsatsen har Kommissionen opfordret medlemsstaterne til at forenkle og begržnse antallet af deres resultatindikatorer. 
As part of the simplification drive, the Commission called on Member States to simplify and reduce the number of their impact indicators.