natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Rapporteringen var ufuldstžndig og gav ikke tilstržkkelige oplysninger om resultater. 
Reporting was incomplete and did not provide sufficient information about results.
Vi bemžrkede visse forbedringer i disse henseender fra 2015 (punkt 56-60). 
We noted some improvements in these respects from 2015 (paragraphs 56 to 60).
34 Anbefaling 2 Interventionerne bżr vžre konsekvent resultatorienterede Kommissionen bżr: Ľ yderligere reducere forsinkelserne i forbindelse med indgelse af kontrakter og undg anvendelse af finansiering med tilbagevirkende kraft Ľ basere kontraktovervgningen og -rapporteringen p specifikke og mlbare resultater med indikatorer, der gżr det muligt at mle de opnede fremskridt Ľ żge den "resultatorienterede overvgning" af APSA's kapacitetsopbygningsprogrammer og evaluere dem oftere, og Ľ foretage en sammenlignende analyse af de tilgžngelige finansieringsinstrumenter p omrdet fred og sikkerhed og bruge dem p en konsekvent mde. 
34 Recommendation 1 Foster AU ownership of the APSA and refocus EU support The EEAS and Commission should jointly develop a clear, long-term vision of EU support for the APSA, in order to: Ľ progressively decrease and eventually phase out EU support to APSAŐs basic operational costs in favour of well-targeted capacity-building programmes, and Ľ link capacity-building support for the APSA to improvements in the way in which the AU and the SROs operate, and closely monitor the implementation of the AUs commitment to achieve financial independence. Timeframe: end 2020.
Tidsramme: udgangen af 2019. Vedtaget af Afdeling III, der ledes af Bettina Jakobsen, medlem af Revisionsretten, i Luxembourg p mżdet den 26. juni 2018. 
This Report was adopted by Chamber III, headed by Mrs Bettina JAKOBSEN, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 26 June 2018.
EU-FINANSIERINGENS FORDELING P DE STŻTTEDE ORGANISATIONER 1 BILAG I (euro) Stżttet organisation/kontrakt C3IS APF-kontrakt vedrżrende tjenesteydelser JFA-lżnninger II JFA AU-forbindelses- kontorer II JFA AU-forbindelses- kontorer III JFA AU-forbindelses- kontorer IV JFA-lżnninger III APSA SP II APSA SP III ECOWAS-EU Small Arms-projekt Teknisk bistand ECOWAS (gennemfżrelses-stżtte) ECOWAS-tilskud I ECOWAS-tilskud II ECCAS Devis-program nr. 4 I alt AU Forbindelseskontorer 6 000 000 3 000 000 7 000 000 16 000 000 Freds-og sikkerhedsafdelingen 12 500 000 10 000 000 5 000 000 1 384 238 4 455 516 33 339 754 CEN-SAD - - 0 COMESA 595 562 3 019 999 3 615 561 EAC 337 564 2 833 320 3 170 884 EASFSEC 525 379 3 383 092 3 908 471 ECCAS 465 795 3 428 102 1 865 674 5 759 571 ECOWAS 617 014 3 550 000 5 560 000 4 896 500 6 724 594 2 757 182 24 105 291 IGAD 279 152 1 700 000 1 979 152 NARC 511 218 1 899 971 2 411 189 SADC 509 413 4 500 000 5 009 413 Tvžrgende/ikke tildelt 3 235 400 2 000 0 3 237 400 I alt 12 500 000 3 235 400 10 000 000 6 000 000 3 000 000 7 000 000 5 000 000 5 227 335 28 770 000 5 560 000 4 896 500 6 724 594 2 757 182 1 865 674 102 536 686 Kilde: Den Europžiske Revisionsret p grundlag af de reviderede kontrakter 
BREAKDOWN OF THE EU FUNDING PROVIDED TO EACH ORGANISATION SUPPORTED 1 ANNEX I (euro) Organisation supported / Contract C3IS APF Service Contract JFA Salaries II JFA AU Liaison Offices II JFA AU Liaison Offices III JFA AU Liaison Offices IV JFA Salaries III APSA SP II APSA SP III ECOWAS-EU Small Arms Project TA ECOWAS (implementation support) ECOWAS Grant I ECOWAS Grant II ECCAS Devis Programme nĄ4 Total AU Liaison Offices 6 000 000 3 000 000 7 000 000 16 000 000 Peace and Security Department 12 500 000 10 000 000 5 000 000 1 384 238 4 455 516 33 339 754 CEN-SAD - - 0 COMESA 595 562 3 019 999 3 615 561 EAC 337 564 2 833 320 3 170 884 EASFSEC 525 379 3 383 092 3 908 471 ECCAS 465 795 3 428 102 1 865 674 5 759 571 ECOWAS 617 014 3 550 000 5 560 000 4 896 500 6 724 594 2 757 182 24 105 291 IGAD 279 152 1 700 000 1 979 152 NARC 511 218 1 899 971 2 411 189 SADC 509 413 4 500 000 5 009 413 Transversal / not allocated 3 235 400 2 000 0 3 237 400 Total 12 500 000 3 235 400 10 000 000 6 000 000 3 000 000 7 000 000 5 000 000 5 227 335 28 770 000 5 560 000 4 896 500 6 724 594 2 757 182 1 865 674 102 536 686 Source: European Court of Auditors based on contracts audited.
BESLUTNINGSPROCEDURER I FREDSFACILITETEN FOR AFRIKA Beslutningsprocedurer i fredsfaciliteten for Afrika Anmodning fremsat af AU eller fremsat af en subregional organisation (REC/RM) og stżttet af AU 1 BILAG II Standardproces (fredsstżttende operation, APSA) 1. 
DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES OF THE AFRICAN PEACE FACILITY Decision making procedures of the African Peace Facility Request submitted by the AU or a sub-regional organisation (REC/RM) and endorsed by the AU 1 ANNEX II Standard process (PSO, APSA) 1.
EU-Udenrigstjenesten og Kommissionen fremlžgger et fžlles notat for de relevante arbejdsgrupper i Rdet (f.eks. COAFR) 2. 
The EEAS and Commission present a joint information note to the relevant Council working groups (e.g. COAFR) 2.
Rdets Udenrigs-og Sikkerhedspolitiske Komit godkender anmodningen 3. Intern beslutningsproces i Kommissionen - kommissionsafgżrelse (DEC) pkržvet i tilfžlde af en ny fredsstżttende operation Den tidlige reaktionsmekanisme* 1. 
The Political and Security Committee of the Council of the EU approves the request Early Response Mechanism* (ERM) 1.
EU-Udenrigstjenesten og Kommissionen vurderer anmodningen og beslutter i fžllesskab, om det er hensigtsmžssigt at finansiere den 2. 
The EEAS and Commission assess the request and decide jointly on the appropriateness of funding the request 2.
Den Udenrigs-og Sikkerhedspolitiske Komit og de relevante arbejdsgrupper i Rdet informeres * For en periode p op til 12 mneder i forbindelse med interventioner, som p grund af deres art kržver umiddelbar stżtte. -> 2 uger -> 2-3 mneder Kilde: Den Europžiske Revisionsret p grundlag af APF-handlingsprogrammet for 2014-2016, bilag 1. 
The Political and Security Committee and relevant Council working groups are informed * for a period of up to 12 months for interventions which by their nature, require immediate support -> 2 weeks 3. Commission internal decision making process with Commission Decision (DEC) needed in case of new PSO -> 2 Đ 3 months Source: European Court of Auditors based on the APF action programme 2014-2016, Appendix 1.
C3IS er en nżglefaktor for gennemfżrelsen af AMANI AFRICA II-żvelsen, operationaliseringen af den afrikanske beredskabsstyrke og forvaltningen af afrikanskledede fredsstżttende operationer. 
The C3IS is a key enabler to conduct the AMANI AFRICA II exercise, to operationalize the ASF and to manage African-led peace support operations.
At give AUC og REC'er/RM'er rettidig ekstern ekspertise af hżj kvalitet for at fremme gennemfżrelsen af programmer vedrżrende handlingsplanen for freds-og sikkerhedspartnerskabet. 
To provide the AUC and RECs/RMs with high quality and timely external expertise for facilitating the implementation of programmes related to the Action Plan of the Peace and Security Partnership.
Der vil navnlig vžre fokus p udviklingen af APSA via individuelle langsigtede opgaver samt via kortsigtet teknisk bistand inden for en lang ržkke kriseforebyggelses-/-lżsningsaktiviteter samt aktiviteter efter kriser, herunder politikformulering. 
A particular focus will be the development of the APSA, via individual long-term assignments, as well as via short-term technical assistance in a wide range of crisis prevention/resolution and post crisis activities, including policy formulation.
Om nżdvendigt kunne denne tekniske bistand ogs stżtte en styrket sammenhžng mellem APF og RVP'er inden for fred og sikkerhed. 
When needed, this technical assistance could also support strengthening the coherence between the APF and RIPs in the peace and security area.
At sikre, at AU-Kommissionens freds-og sikkerhedsafdeling fortsat er drivkraften bag AU's freds-og sikkerhedsdagsorden p kontinentet, gennem styrkelse af dens kapacitet og organisation i overensstemmelse med dens ambitioner. Den Afrikanske Unions forbindelseskontorer er ikkepermanente strukturer under Den Afrikanske Union, som er til stede i de mest sikkerheds-og fredsrelevante regioner i Afrika. 
To see the AUC Peace and Security Department continue to be the driving force of the AU Peace and Security Agenda on the continent, through an enhanced capacity and organisation in line with its ambitions African Union Liaison offices (AU LO) are non-permanent structures of the African Union present in the most security and peace relevant regions in Africa.
Deres rolle er at stżtte Freds-og Sikkerhedsrdet (PSC) og AU-Kommissionen, deltage i opfżlgningsmekanismer oprettet i fredsaftaler og stżtte gennemfżrelsen af disse. 
Their role is to support the Peace and Security Council (PSC) and the AU Commission, to participate in follow up mechanisms provided by peace agreements and to support their implementation.
Programmet er en multidonoraktivitet, der džkker AU-forbindelseskontorernes personale-og driftsomkostninger. 
The programme is a multi donor activity, taking into charge staff and operational costs of the AU LO.
Den Afrikanske Unions forbindelseskontorer er ikkepermanente strukturer under Den Afrikanske Union, som er til stede i de mest sikkerheds-og fredsrelevante regioner i Afrika. 
African Union Liaison offices (AU LO) are non-permanent structures of the African Union present in the most security and peace relevant regions in Africa.
At sikre, at AU-Kommissionens freds-og sikkerhedsafdeling fortsat er drivkraften bag AU's freds-og sikkerhedsdagsorden p kontinentet gennem styrkelse af dens kapacitet og organisation i overensstemmelse med dens ambitioner. 
To ensure that the AUC Peace and Security Department continue to be the driving force of the AU Peace and Security Agenda on the continent, through an enhanced capacity and organization in line with its ambitions.
Mlet med interventionen er at styrke AU-Kommissionens, REC'ernes og RM'ernes kapacitet og effektivitet med hensyn til at forebygge og/eller reagere p kriser i Afrika. 
The objective of the intervention is to strengthen the capacity and efficiency of the AUC, RECs and RMs to prevent and/or respond to crises in Africa.
Aktionen fokuserede p aktiviteter, som var nżdvendige for at sžtte AU-Kommissionen og REC'erne/RM'erne i stand til at gennemfżre deres aktiviteter og fžrdiggżre og politisk godkende de afrikanske freds-og sikkerhedsstrategier ssom APSA-kżreplanen. 
The action focused on activities required to enable the AUC and the RECs/RMs to sustain their activities and to finalise and politically endorse the key African peace and security strategies, such as the APSA Roadmap.
At bidrage til fred og sikkerhed i Afrika og dermed tilvejebringe de nżdvendige betingelser og forudsžtninger for udvikling i overensstemmelse med AU's ml om nedlžggelse af vbnene senest i 2020. 
To contribute to peace and security in Africa, thus providing the necessary conditions and pre-requisite for development, in line with the AU's objective to 'Silence the Guns by 2020'.
At reducere virkningerne af konflikter og vold gennem institutionaliseret, koordineret forebyggelse og styring og etablering af en fredsarkitektur, der skaber robuste samfund. 
To reduce effects of conlicts and violence through institutionalised, coordinated prevention and management and establishment of peace architecture for resilient communities.
Forvaltning af hndvben og lette vben i Nigeria (supplerer ECOWAS-EU Small Arms-projektet, tegner sig for det meste af budgettet), 2. 
Management of Small Arms and light weapons in Nigeria (complementing the ECOWAS EU Small Arms project, most of budget), 2.
Studietur til Lyon vedrżrende det vestafrikanske politiinformationssystem (WAPIS), 3. 
Study tour to Lyon for West African Police Information Systems initiative (WAPIS), 3.
Styrkelse af ECOWAS' operationelle kapacitet til at integrere kżnsaspektet i ECOWAS' freds-og sikkerhedsarkitektur Aktionen "Devis-program nr. 4" er det sidste programestimat i programmet "Programme d'appui  la CEEAC en matire de Paix et de Securit" (PAPS II) og har til forml at fortsžtte stżtten til ECCAS med henblik p at underbygge kapaciteten inden for fred og sikkerhed. 
Strengthening ECOWAS operational capacity to integrate gender in the ECOWAS Peace and Security Architecture The action ŇDevis programme 4Ó is the last programme estimate of the program ŇProgramme dŐappui  la CEEAC en matire de Paix et de SecuritÓ (PAPS II) and is aiming at continuing the support to the ECCAS in order to sustain capacities in the area of peace and security 359795 ECCAS - Devis Programme nĄ4 de croisire et de clture Colour legend: In all significant respects, standards have been met Some standards are not met Significant deviation from the standards Too early to assess or sufficient information not available
KOMMISSIONENS OG EU-UDENRIGSTJENESTENS SVAR P DEN EUROPŽISKE REVISIONSRETS SŽRBERETNING "DEN AFRIKANSKE FREDS-OG SIKKERHEDSARKITEKTUR: EU-STŻTTEN BŻR HAVE NYT FOKUS" RESUM III. 
REPLIES OF THE COMMISSION AND THE EEAS TO THE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS "THE AFRICAN PEACE AND SECURITY ARCHITECTURE: NEED TO REFOCUS EU SUPPORT" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY III.
EU-stżtten til den afrikanske freds-og sikkerhedsarkitektur (APSA), bde for s vidt angr kompetencer og finansielt ejerskab, har vžret et vigtigt bidrag til udviklingen af denne arkitektur, omend de forventede resultater ikke er opnet p systematisk vis. 
EU support to the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) both in terms of capacities as well as of financial ownership, has been instrumental in contributing to the development of this architecture Đ although expected results have not systematically been reached.
Bidrag til lżn eller andre driftsomkostninger er ikke et problem i sig selv, s lžnge det er forbundet med opnelse af resultater og udgżr en del af en bredere stżttestrategi med en klar exitstrategi. 
Contributing to salaries or other operational costs is not an issue in itself as long as it is linked to achieving results and is part of a wider support strategy with a clear exit strategy.
EU fastsatte specifikke prioriteter for sin stżtte til APSA. 
The EU did set specific priorities for its support to APSA.
Det er i EU's specifikke interesse at stżtte afrikanske lżsninger p freds-og sikkerhedsproblemer for at skabe mere stabilitet i Afrika. 
It is in the EU's specific interest to support African solutions to African peace and security problems in order to stabilise Africa.
Dette er den centrale mlsžtning for EU's stżtte til den afrikanske freds-og sikkerhedsarkitektur (APSA). 
This is the core objective of the EU's support to the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA).
Det er en langsigtet indsats, hvor resultaterne ikke kan mles med det samme. 
It is a long term endeavour, for which results cannot be measured immediately.
I praksis skal EU's mlsžtning opns gennem en klart formuleret strategi: 2016-2020 APSA-kżreplanen1. 
Operationally, the EU objective is to be reached through a clearly formulated strategy: the 2016-2020 APSA Roadmap1.
Gennemfżrelsen af denne kżreplan stżttes direkte gennem en ržkke programmer, navnlig den igangvžrende tredje fase af APSA-stżtteprogrammet ("APSA III")2. 
The implementation of this Roadmap is directly supported through a set of programmes, especially the ongoing third phase of the APSA Support Programme ('APSA III')2.
Aktiviteterne under APSA III er mere detaljeret beskrevet i rlige arbejdsplaner, der giver mulighed for at prioritere EU's stżtte og benchmarke konkrete resultater i forhold til konkrete ml. 
The activities under APSA III are further detailed through annual work plans, which allow for a prioritisation of EU's support and for benchmarking of concrete results against concrete objectives.
For at kunne skabe disse resultater džkker Kommissionen en ržkke aktiviteter, hvis gennemfżrelse kržver stżtte til driftsomkostninger, ssom oplžring, rejser og lżn til personalet i freds-og sikkerhedsafdelingen i Den Afrikanske Unions Kommission (AUC). 
In order to deliver on those results, the Commission covers a set of activities, the implementation of which requires supporting operational costs such as trainings, travels, and salaries of the African Union Commission (AUC) Peace and Security Department staff.
Finansieringen af disse omkostninger har haft afgżrende betydning for opfyldelsen af hovedmlsžtningen for EU's stżtte. 
Financing these costs has been essential to achieve the main objective of the EU support.
V. Den manglende information om resultaterne betyder ikke, at der mangler resultater. 
V. The lack of information on results does not mean that there is a lack of results.
Den manglende information alene kan derfor ikke siges at vžre en hindring for leveringen af EU-stżtte. 
Consequently, it cannot in itself be considered to be hampering the delivery of the EU's support.
Den sene undertegnelse af kontrakter og finansiering med tilbagevirkende kraft skyldes ofte forsinkede anmodninger og utilstržkkelig relevant information fra de organisationer, der gennemfżrer EU-stżtten. 
The late signature of contracts and retroactive financing is very often due to belated requests and insufficient adequate information from the Organisations implementing EUŐs aid.
For s vidt angr sammenhžngen understreger Kommissionen, at der er sket betydelige fremskridt med hensyn til at gżre mere sammenhžngende brug af finansieringsinstrumenterne. 
On coherence, the Commission stresses that significant progress has been made with regards to making a more coherent use of financing instruments.
Navnlig har Kommissionen etableret et uformelt netvžrk af APSA-fokuspunkter. 
In particular, the Commission has put in place an informal network of APSA focal points.
Netvžrket gennemfżrer hżringer inden for Kommissionen i forbindelse med fastlžggelse og formulering af bde APSA-stżtteprogrammer inden for rammerne af APF (fredsfaciliteten for Afrika) og regionale vejledende programmer (RVP'er). 
The network facilitates consultations within the Commission during the identification and formulation of both APF (African Peace Facility) APSA support programmes and Regional Indicative Programmes (RIPs).
Endvidere deltager alle relevante tjenestegrene fra Kommissionen/EU-Udenrigstjenesten i interne kvalitetsstżttegrupper, hvor freds-og sikkerhedsprogrammerne drżftes, og komplementariteten mellem instrumenterne gennemgs. 
In addition all relevant Commission Services /EEAS participate in internal Quality Support Groups during which peace and security programmes are discussed and complementarity between instruments is reviewed.
VI. i) Kommissionen og EU-Udenrigstjenesten accepterer anbefalingen. 
VI. (i) The Commission and the EEAS accept the recommendation.
Ad hoc-stżtte til driftsomkostninger kan imidlertid stadig vžre relevant under visse forhold. ii) Kommissionen accepterer anbefalingen. 
However, ad hoc support to operational costs may still be appropriate under certain conditions. (ii) The Commission accepts the recommendation.
INDLEDNING Tekstboks 2 Đ Et eksempel p indgreb inden for rammerne af APSA Denne case er et eksempel p god praksis vedrżrende sammenhžngende brug af EU's vžrktżjer til at stżtte APSA's positive indgriben i Gambia gennem ECOWAS (Det Żkonomiske Fžllesskab af Vestafrikanske Stater): Langsigtet kapacitetsopbygning i ECOWAS inden for fred og sikkerhed gennem fredsfaciliteten for Afrika og det regionale vejledende program kombineret med egen stżtte fra fredsfaciliteten for Afrika til ECOWAS-missionen i Gambia (ECOMIG) (fżrst gennem mekanismen for tidlig indsats, derefter gennem fredsstżtteoperationens bevillingsramme3). 
INTRODUCTION Box 2: An example of intervention under the APSA This case is a good practice example of coherent use of the EU's tools to support the APSA's positive intervention in the Gambia through ECOWAS (Economic Community of the West African States): long-term capacity building of ECOWAS in the area of peace and security through the African Peace Facility and the Regional Indicative Programme combined with an African Peace Facility support to the ECOWAS Mission in the Gambia (ECOMIG) itself (first through the Early Response Mechanism, then through the Peace Support Operation envelope3).
Den aktuelle status for AU-medlemsstaternes finansielle bidrag til fredsfonden er 42,4 mio. 
The current status of AU member states financial contributions to the Peace Fund is USD 42.4 million.
USD blev indsamlet i 2017 alene, hvilket var det stżrste belżb givet af medlemsstater i Den Afrikanske Union, siden den blev etableret i 1993. 
USD 39.9 million was collected for the year 2017 alone Đ the most important amount contributed by African Union member states since its establishment in 1993.
Udarbejdelsen af APSA-kżreplaner har vžret en afrikansk ejet proces, men den er blevet understżttet af EU gennem teknisk bistand og afholdelse af mżder og seminarer som en del af APSA-stżtteprogram II. 
The development of APSA roadmaps has indeed been an African owned process, but one which has been supported by the EU through the provision of technical assistance and the facilitation of meetings and seminars as part of the APSA Support Programme II.
BEMŽRKNINGER 23. 
OBSERVATIONS 23.
For s vidt angr finansielt ejerskab og bžredygtighed anerkender Kommissionen og EU-Udenrigstjenesten vigtigheden af, at Den Afrikanske Union og de afrikanske selvregulerende organisationer gradvist żger deres andel af de pkržvede midler. 
On this issue of financial ownership and sustainability, the Commission and the EEAS acknowledge the importance for the African Union and the African SROs to gradually increase their share of the funds needed.
2, i TEU), navnlig Kaberuka-processen og indfżrelsen af en afgift p 0,2 % p importerede varer. 
41.2 TEU), in particular the Kaberuka process and the implementation of the 0.2% levy on imported goods.
Som resultat heraf żges AU's finansielle ejerskab af APSA allerede. 
As a consequence, the financial ownership of the APSA by the AU is already increasing.
Eksempelvis bliver 57 % af lżnnen til midlertidigt ansatte i AUC, der arbejder p freds-og sikkerhedsprogrammer, džkket af AU-medlemsstaternes bidrag i 2018, og kun 15 % džkkes af EU (sammenlignet med 34 % i de seneste 16 mneder). 
For example, in 2018, 57% of the salaries of AUC short-term personnel working on peace and security programmes will be covered by AU Member States contributions, and only 15% by the EU (against 34% in the previous 16 months).
Overordnet har denne indsats allerede betydet, at AU overtager en stżrre del af budgettet for 2018: 41,3 % i 2018 (318 mio. USD ud af 770 mio. USD) sammenlignet med 26,2 % i 2017 (205 mio. 
Overall, these efforts have already resulted in the AU assuming a larger part of its 2018 budget: 41,3 % in 2018 (USD 318 million out of 770 million) instead of 26,2 % in 2017 (USD 205 million out of 783 million).
Andre donorer, der aktivt stżtter APSA, er Norge, Det Forenede Kongerige, Danmark, Tyskland og Nederlandene. 
Other donors that are active in supporting APSA are Norway, the UK, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands.
Den del af APSA's driftsomkostninger, der finansieres af AU-medlemsstater, żges derfor gradvist. 
The part of the APSA operational costs being funded by the AU Member States is therefore progressively increasing.
Frem for żget afhžngighed viser tallene, at udviklingen gr i retning af mindre afhžngighed af donorstżtte. 
Rather than more dependency, the figures show a path towards less dependency on donor support.
Donorstżtte til EU's afrikanske partnere inden for APSA kan ikke med rimelighed forventes at stoppe inden for den nžrmeste fremtid. 
Donor support to EU African partners in the area of the APSA cannot reasonably be expected to fully come to an end in the near future.
Endvidere er der med hensyn til finansielt ejerskab og bžredygtighed tale om muligheder og politiske valg. 
Moreover, the issue of financial ownership and sustainability is one of opportunity and political choice.