natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vurderingsmžndene havde ikke fet pržcise retningslinjer, og de ikke sžrlig klare instrukser vedrżrende indregning af endnu ikke udbetalte dyrepržmier i godtgżrelsen gav anledning til forskellige praksis. 
Valuers were not given precise guidelines, and instructions on including outstanding animal premiums in the compensation figure were imprecise, leading to variations in the practices followed.
I Irland udarbejdede den kompetente myndighed en mnedlig liste med nżjagtige priser for alle kategorier af kvžg, hvorimod den prisoversigt, som den kompetente myndighed udarbejdede for fr, var ufuldstžndig, og der var ikke angivet noget maksimumsbelżb. 
In Ireland the responsible authority produced a monthly list of precise prices for all categories of cattle. In the case of sheep, on the other hand, the price grid established by the responsible authority was incomplete and provided no upper limits.
I Nederlandene havde den kompetente myndighed p forhnd udarbejdet en oversigt over referencepriser, og de procedurer, der skulle fżlges ved vurderingen, var allerede fastsat i beredskabsplanen. 
In the Netherlands the reference price grid was set in advance by the responsible authority and the valuation procedures to be followed had already been laid down in the contingency plan.
Det medvirkede til en mere nżjagtig og ensartet vurdering af dyrenes vžrdi. 
This was a contributory factor in achieving more precise and uniform assessments of animal value.
I Frankrig var der blevet beregnet en standardsats for fr, men for de andre kategorier af dyr var de nationale regler utilstržkkelige, og det gav de enkelte pržfekturer mulighed for at vžlge forskellige ordninger. 
In France a flat-rate scale had been set for sheep, but for other categories of animal the inadequacy of the national framework allowed prefectures to opt for various systems.
(73) Systemet til identifikation og registrering af kvžg omfatter żremžrker og pas til individuel identifikation af kvžg, individuelle registre, som fżres p hver enkelt bedrift, og databaser oprettet af medlemsstaterne. 
(73) The cattle registration and identification system comprises ear tags and passports identifying cattle individually, individual registers kept on every farm, and computer databases set up by the Member States.
Databaserne skal gżre det muligt p et hvilket som helst tidspunkt at f oplyst identifikationsnumrene p alle de dyr, der befinder sig p bedriften, samt at f kendskab til samtlige flytninger af alle dyr siden deres fżdsel. 
The database must provide at any time the identity numbers of all the cattle present on a holding, together with all movements of all cattle from birth.
6/2004 om systemet til identifikation og registrering af kvžg) kunne man have udskrevet lister over de dyr, der befandt sig p bedrifterne, s dyrlžgerne og vurderingsmžndene kunne have anvendt disse lister til kontrol af antallet af dyr, til at sikre, at dyrene blev slet ned, og til vurdering af deres vžrdi. 
Despite the weaknesses detected in the application of the system (see Special Report No 6/2004 on the cattle identification and registration system), it would have been possible for lists of cattle present on farms to be printed and used by vets and valuers to verify animalsŐ history, slaughter them and establish their value.
Da der ikke forel pržcise fžllesskabsregler, medfżrte medlemsstaternes ordninger, at godtgżrelserne til producenterne ikke blev ensartede. 
In the absence of detailed Community regulations the systems introduced in the Member States resulted in lack of uniformity in the compensation to farmers.
I Det Forenede Kongerige konstaterede bde NAO og Kommissionen og Retten, at dyrenes vžrdi var blevet vurderet hżjt i forhold til deres vžrdi ved begyndelsen af krisen. 
In the United Kingdom the NAO, like the Commission and the Court, detected animal values that were higher than the values at the beginning of the crisis.
Nogle producenter havde fet udbetalt et tillžg, i alt 4,2 millioner euro, i forhold til den oprindelige vurdering af deres dyr (Frankrig, Irland og Det Forenede Kongerige). 
Additional payments totalling 4,2 million euro relative to the initial valuation of the animals were granted to some farmers (France, Ireland, United Kingdom).
I andre tilfžlde var godtgżrelserne blevet sat ned (Nederlandene). 
In other cases the compensation was reduced (Netherlands).
De gennemsnitlige godtgżrelser udbetalt til producenterne af kvžg og fr var betydeligt hżjere i Det Forenede Kongerige end i de andre medlemsstater, hvorimod godtgżrelserne for svin var hżjere i Frankrig (jf. indrammet tekst nr. 6 og figur 3). 
The average compensation paid to farmers was noticeably higher in the United Kingdom for cattle and sheep than in the other Member States, while in France it was higher for pigs (see Box 6 and Diagram 3).
6 De godtgżrelser, medlemsstaterne udbetalte I Det Forenede Kongerige var godtgżrelserne store: National Audit Office konstaterede, at den standardiserede prisoversigt, der under en del af krisen var blevet anvendt til vurdering af dyrene, var baseret p de hżjeste priser, der var gžldende umiddelbart fżr krisen. 
Box 6 Compensation paid by Member States In the United Kingdom the compensation paid was high: the National Audit Office reported that the standard rate card used to value animals during part of the crisis was based on the highest prices prevailing just before the crisis.
I kontrakten med vurderingsmžndene var disses vederlag kždet sammen med vurderingen af dyrenes vžrdi, og der var derfor en iboende risiko for, at vurderingsbelżbet og dermed den udbetalte godtgżrelse ville stige uberettiget. 
The contracts that were concluded with the valuers tied their remuneration to the estimated value of the animals, with the inherent risk that the estimated value (and, therefore, the compensation paid) would be unduly increased.
Kommissionen har beregnet, at godtgżrelserne for kvžg i gennemsnit udgjorde mere en det dobbelte af dyrenes vžrdi, godtgżrelserne for fr mere end to og en halv gange dyrenes vžrdi og godtgżrelserne for svin nžsten to gange deres vžrdi, hvilket resulterede i at den kompetente myndighed anmeldte et belżb, som var ansat 811,7 millioner euro for hżjt. 
The Commission has calculated that the average compensation paid for cattle was more than twice their value, more than 2,5 times value for sheep and almost twice value for pigs, resulting in an over-valuation (811,7 million euro) of the amount declared by the responsible authority.
For Frankrigs vedkommende har Kommissionen vurderet, at den anmeldte vžrdi af dyrene er ansat 1,1 million euro for hżjt, hvilket fżrst og fremmest skyldes, at der i godtgżrelserne var indregnet driftstab, og at svinenes vžrdi var vurderet for hżjt. 
In the case of France the Commission estimated that 1,1 million euro of the amount declared was attributable to the over-valuation of animals, mainly because the compensation included indirect losses and the valuations for pigs were too high.
I Irland (0,5 millioner euro) og i Det Forenede Kongerige (1,7 millioner euro) fik de landbrugere, som appellerede vurderingerne, udbetalt tillžg, men i de tilfžlde, hvor den kompetente myndighed havde fundet vurderingerne meget hżje, medfżrte dette ikke en reduktion i de belżb, der blev udbetalt. 
In Ireland and the United Kingdom additional amounts (0,5 million euro and 1,7 million euro respectively) were paid to farmers who disputed valuations, but the amount of compensation paid was not cut in cases where the responsible authority found the valuation too high.
I Frankrig blev den faste sats for fr hžvet, hvilket sammen med erstatningen for destruktion af dyrekroppe medfżrte et tillžg p nžsten 2 millioner euro. 
In France the flat-rate scale for sheep was revised upwards, adding almost two million euro to the compensation for destroying carcasses.
I Nederlandene besluttede ministeriet at nedsžtte godtgżrelsen for smittede dyr med 50 % af deres vžrdi. 
In the Netherlands the ministry decided to reduce the compensation for infected animals by 50 % of their value.
Det betżd, at en producent p den samme bedrift for nogle af de smittede dyr fik udbetalt en godtgżrelse p 50 % af dyrenes vžrdi, mens han for andre fik godtgjort 100 % af deres vžrdi. 
As a consequence farmers received 50 % of the value of infected animals and 100 % of the value of other animals, all on the same farm.
Der blev udarbejdet en oversigt med forudfastsatte priser, som blev anvendt som vejledning ved vurderingen. 
A price grid was drawn up in advance and used as a valuation guide.
C 54/20 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende Figur 3 Gennemsnitsgodtgżrelser pr. aflivet dyr i de forskellige dyrekategorier udbetalt i 2001 3.3.2005 Kurs: 1 euro = 0,62380 pund sterling (pr. 3.12.2001). Kilde: FR/anmodninger om tilskud (5.10.2001 og 6.12.2002). 
C 54/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union Diagram 3 Average compensation paid per head for different categories of animals slaughtered in 2001 3.3.2005 Exchange rate: 1 euro = 0,62380 pound sterling (on 3 December 2001) Source: FR/ Claims for reimbursement (5 October 2001 and 6 December 2002).
IRL/anmodning om tilskud (6.2.2002). 
IRL/ Claim for reimbursement (6 February 2002).
NL/anmodning om tilskud (april 2002). 
NL/ Claim for reimbursement (April 2002).
UK/anmodninger om tilskud (december 2001 og 26.2.2003) og anmodning om tilskud til Nordirland. 
UK/ Claims for reimbursement (December 2001 and 26 February 2003) plus Northern Ireland claim for reimbursement.
Fem mneder efter mund-og klovesygekrisens begyndelse, da medlemsstaterne allerede havde ydet kompensation, udarbejdede Kommissionen en undtagelsesforordning (74) vedrżrende medlemsstaternes udbetaling af dyre-og slagtepržmier (75) under markedsstżtteforanstaltningerne. 
Five months after the start of the FMD crisis, when Member States had already begun to award compensation, the Commission drew up a regulation of derogation (74) concerning Member StatesŐ payment of the Community per capita animal and slaughter premiums under market support measures (75).
Denne forordning gav medlemsstaterne tilladelse til at udbetale disse pržmier til producenterne oven i godtgżrelsen i forbindelse med mund-og klovesyge, uden at disse behżvede at overholde betingelserne for, hvor lžnge dyrene under normale forhold skal holdes p bedrifterne af hensyn til kontrollen (identifikation og tžlling af dyr). 
The Regulation authorised Member States to pay the premiums to farmers, in addition to the FMD compensation, without their having to comply with the conditions governing retention of animals on the farm which are necessary for control purposes under normal circumstances (identification and counting of the animals).
(74) Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1458/2001 (EFT L 194 af 18.7.2001, s. 
(74) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1458/2001 (OJ L 194,18.7.2001, p. 4).
Denne forordning blev udarbejdet af Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug. 
This Regulation was drawn up by the Directorate-General for Agriculture.
(75) Forordningerne vedrżrende dyrepržmier (Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 1254/1999 (EFT L 160 af 26.6.1999, s. 
(75) The regulations on animal premiums (Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p.
21) og Kommissionens gennemfżrelsesforordning (EF) nr. 2342/1999 (EFT L 281 af 4.11.1999, s. 
21) and the Commission implementing Regulation (EC) No 2342/1999 (OJ L 281, 4.11.1999, p.
30) for kvžg og Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 2467/98 (EFT L 312 af 20.11.1998, s. 
30) for cattle and Council Regulation (EC) No 2467/98 (OJ L 312, 20.11.1998, p.
1) for fr), som er markedsstżtteforanstaltninger, er udarbejdet og forvaltet af Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug. 
1) for sheep), which are market support measures, were drafted by the Directorate-General for Agriculture and administered by them.
Pržmierne betales til producenter, som holder kvžg og fr, p betingelse af, at dyrene holdes p bedriften i bestemte perioder. 
The premiums are granted to farmers holding cattle and sheep, provided that certain retention periods are observed.
Under udarbejdelsen af undtagelsesforordningen havde Kommissionen imidlertid ikke taget hżjde for den salgspraksis, der gžlder under normale forhold, sžrlig i Irland og Det Forenede Kongerige, og som bestr i, at belżbet for dyrepržmier, som endnu ikke er kommet til udbetaling, men som den nye ejer vil f udbetalt, indregnes i salgsprisen. 
However, when it drafted the derogation Regulation the Commission did not take into account the selling practices that normally apply, particularly in Ireland and the United Kingdom, whereby the sale price of animals includes the amount of any animal premiums still outstanding from which the next buyer might benefit.
Vurderingsmžndene i Irland og Det Forenede Kongerige fulgte derfor den sždvanlige salgspraksis og mente, at Čen passende godtgżrelseÇ til dyreejerne burde tage hensyn til de pržmier, producenterne endnu ikke havde fet udbetalt, og indregnede belżbet i vurderingen af dyrenes vžrdi, som kompensationen for mund-og klovesyge blev baseret p. 
In actual fact, valuers in Ireland and the United Kingdom followed the usual practice and, taking the view that adequate compensation for farmers ought to include any premiums still due to the farmers, they included them in the livestock valuations for FMD compensation purposes.
Men da Kommissionen ikke havde taget denne praksis i betragtning, forbżd den ikke, at medlemsstaterne efterfżlgende udbetalte dyrepržmierne i de tilfžlde, hvor de forinden var indregnet i kompensationen for mund-og klovesyge. 
The Commission, however, omitted to take this practice into consideration and did not instruct Member States to refrain from paying animal premiums subsequently if they had already been included in the FMD compensation.
Eftersom Irland og Det Forenede Kongerige allerede havde indregnet belżbet for nogle af disse pržmier i den godtgżrelse for mund-og klovesyge, som producenterne tidligere havde fet udbetalt, betżd det, at nogle af dem fik udbetalt pržmiebelżbet to gange. 
Given that Ireland and the United Kingdom had already included the amount of some of these premiums in the FMD compensation previously paid to farmers, this meant that some farmers were able to collect the amount of premium twice.
3.3.2005 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 54/21 70. 
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/21 70.
I praksis var der p vurderingskortene kun anfżrt et samlet belżb, og pržmierne var ikke holdt uden for den specifikke vžrdi af dyrene. Nr der blev foretaget kontrol, var det derfor vanskeligt at vurdere nżjagtigt, hvor mange pržmier der var blevet udbetalt to gange. Men nr man gr ud fra, at vurderingsmžndene var blevet instrueret om at indregne pržmiebelżbet i vurderingen af dyrene, hvilket nogle af dem bekržftede direkte, anslr Retten, at der i Det Forenede Kongerige er udbetalt dyrepržmier (76), som allerede var indregnet i godtgżrelsen for mund-og klovesyge, til et belżb p ca. 
In practice the animal valuation forms only gave an overall amount, without distinguishing between the premiums and the intrinsic value of the animals, so that it was difficult for an auditor to set a precise figure on the extent of double payments. However, given that valuers had been instructed to include the amount of the premiums in the livestock valuations and that some of them had given direct confirmation of the inclusion, the Court was able to estimate that the total for animal premiums (76) paid to the United Kingdom in duplication of those included in the FMD compensation could be of the order of 10 million pounds sterling (more than 16 million euro) (77).
I Irland konstaterede Retten ogs tilfžlde, hvor der i tillžg til godtgżrelserne var udbetalt oksekżdspržmier; dog var der tale om mindre belżb (78). 
In Ireland as well, the Court identified cattle premiums that had been paid in addition to compensation, but the amounts were smaller (78).
I Frankrig havde nogle pržfekturer indregnet oksekżdspržmierne i godtgżrelserne, andre ikke. 
In France some prefectures included bovine premiums in the compensation, others did not.
Til gengžld gjorde det nederlandske landbrugsministerium Retten opmžrksom p, at det ikke havde indregnet nogen pržmier i godtgżrelserne for mund-og klovesyge. 
The agriculture ministry in the Netherlands, on the other hand, told the Court that it had not included any premiums in the FMD compensation.
Inden for rammerne af markedsstżtteforanstaltningerne er det ogs fastsat i en rdsforordning (79), at der kan udbetales slagtepržmier p betingelse af, at der foreligger en attest fra slagteriet, som bekržfter, at dyret er slagtet. 
Still in the context of market support measures, provision for payment of a slaughtering premium for cattle is included in a Council Regulation (79) requiring an abattoir certificate to confirm that the animal has been slaughtered.
Forordningen angiver imidlertid ikke nžrmere, hvad der menes hermed, dvs. om der skal vžre tale om slagtning med henblik p konsum (EUGFL, Garantisektionen Ń markedsstżtte) eller nedslagning (EUGFL, Garantisektionen Ń veterinžrspżrgsml). 
This Regulation, however, does not specify the nature of the slaughtering, i.e. whether it is for purposes of human consumption (EAGGF Guarantee Section - market support) or on health grounds (EAGGF Guarantee Section - veterinary).
Ifżlge fortolkningerne var det muligt at udbetale slagtepržmier som tillžg til kompensationen i forbindelse med mund-og klovesyge, men kun til den lille gruppe af producenter, hvis smittede dyr var blevet aflivet p et slagteri. 
Depending on the interpretation it was possible for the slaughter premium to be paid in addition to the FMD compensation, but only to a small minority of farmers whose contaminated animals were slaughtered at an abattoir.
Da en af medlemsstaterne spurgte Kommissionen herom, afgjorde den ikke sagen og gav ikke noget svar p, hvordan bestemmelsen skulle fortolkes, inden udlżbet af fristen for, hvornr der skulle udbetales slagtepržmier for 2001, som var fastsat til den 30. juni 2002. 
When questioned on the subject by one of the Member States the Commission did not resolve the matter, and did not give a reply on the interpretation to be adopted before the deadline of 30 June 2002 set by the regulations for payment of the 2001 slaughter premiums.
Medlemsstaterne traf derfor ikke de samme beslutninger, og det medfżrte, at producenterne blev forskelsbe-handlet. I Nederlandene, hvor en vžsentlig del af dyrene var (76) Oksekżdspržmier og moderfrspržmier. 
On the other hand, in Ireland, where part of the culling was also carried out in abattoirs, the premiums were paid; they were recovered, (76) Cattle and ewe premiums.
(77) Vekselkursen er Kommissionens (en euro = 0,62380 pund sterling) pr. december 2001, den dato, hvor Det Forenede Kongerige forelagde sin anmodning om tilskud. 
(77) The official rate used by the Commission (1 euro = 0,62380 pounds sterling) is the rate for December 2001, the date when the United Kingdom submitted its request for reimbursement.
(78) I alt ca. 800 dyr svarende til et samlet belżb p 38 000 euro. 
(78) A total of around 800 animals, corresponding to a sum total of 38 000 euro.
(79) Forordning (EF) nr. 
(79) Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999. however, after the CourtŐs audit visit.
I Det Forenede Kongerige blev pržmierne ikke udbetalt, da man ville undg risikoen for, at de samme pržmier blev udbetalt to gange, da de allerede kunne vžre indregnet i kompensationen for mund-og klovesyge. 
In the United Kingdom the premiums were not paid, in order to avoid possible duplication with the FMD compensation, which already included them.
I henhold til Rdets beslutning 90/424/EŻF fastlžgger Kommissionen med bistand fra Den Stende Veterinžrkomit (80) de gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser, der skal anvendes i forbindelse med Fžllesskabets tilskud til medlemsstaternes udgifter. 
Rules and procedures governing eligibility of Member StatesŐ expenditure for Community reimbursement were defined late 74. Under Decision 90/424/EEC the Commission, with the help of the Standing Veterinary Committee (80), is responsible for laying down procedures for implementing the Community financial contribution to Member StatesŐ expenditure.
Endvidere skal Kommissionen ligeledes med bistand fra denne komit definere arten af de supplerende foranstaltninger, der er nżdvendige for at udrydde en epizooti, og Fžllesskabets finansielle tilskud til disse foranstaltninger. 
The Commission, again with the CommitteeŐs help, is also responsible for defining the nature of any additional measures that might be needed to eradicate an outbreak of disease, and the nature of the resultant Community financial contribution.
Kommissionen havde ikke foreslet gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser for Fžllesskabets finansielle tilskud inden krisen p trods af, at den tidligere i sit svar til opfżlgningen af Rettens rsberetning for 1995 havde forpligtet sig til bde at Čgive medlemsstaterne retningslinjer bde for godtgżrelsesprocedurerne og beregningen med henblik p EUŐs medfinansiering af veterinžr-foranstaltningerneÇ (jf. indrammet tekst nr. 
Before the crisis, the Commission had not made any proposals for procedures for implementing the Community financial contribution, despite the undertaking it had given earlier in response to the follow-up of the CourtŐs 1995 Annual Report, Ôto issue guidelines to the Member States concerning both procedures and the calculation of compensation with regard to Community co-financing of veterinary measuresŐ (see Box 4).
Seks mneder efter krisens udbrud informerede Kommissionen medlemsstaterne om (81), at den kun ville yde tilskud til erstatninger Čsvarende til den vžrdi, som dyrene havde, umiddelbart fżr de blev inficeretÇ. Men p det tidspunkt havde alle de berżrte medlemsstater allerede udbetalt en stor del af erstatningerne til producenterne efter forskellige metoder (jf. punkt 62-66). 
Six months after the start of the crisis it informed the Member States (81) that it would only reimburse compensation for animals Ôat the value the animals had immediately before they became affectedŐ, whereas all the Member States concerned had already paid a substantial part of the compensation to farmers, using different methods (see paragraphs 62 to 66).
(80) Komiteen, som blev oprettet ved Rdets afgżrelse 68/361/EŻF (EFT L 255 af 18.10.1968, s. 
(80) The Committee was set up by Council Decision 68/361/EEC (OJ L 255, 18.10.1968, p.
23), afgiver udtalelse om Kommissionens udkast til de foranstaltninger, der skal tržffes. 
23) and gives an opinion on the CommissionŐs draft proposals on action to be taken.
(81) Medlemsstaterne blev fżrst underrettet, da epidemien var s godt som afsluttet: Ń Irland: beslutning 2001/646/EF Ń Frankrig: beslutning 2001/653/EF Ń Nederlandene: beslutning 2001/652/EF Ń Det Forenede Kongerige: beslutning 2001/654/EF. 
(81) The Member States were notified virtually at the end of the epidemic, namely: Ń for Ireland: Decision 2001/646/EC, Ń for France: Decision 2001/653/EC, Ń for the Netherlands: Decision 2001/652/EC, Ń for the United Kingdom: Decision 2001/654/EC.
C 54/22 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 3.3.2005 77. 
C 54/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 77.
P grund af de manglende instrukser fra Kommissionen har medlemsstaterne i deres anmodninger om tilskud da ogs medregnet de erstatninger, de havde udbetalt til producenter, som ikke havde overholdt de nationale gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser til fžllesskabsdirektiverne for s vidt angr anmeldelse af sygdommen og restriktionerne med hensyn til flytning af dyr (ca. 972 876 euro i Det Forenede Kongerige og 58 769 euro i Frankrig Ń jf. punkt 56). 
Similarly, in the absence of Commission instructions, the Member StatesŐ requests for reimbursement included compensation paid to farmers who had not complied with national provisions implementing the Community directives on notification and movement restrictions (some 972 876 euro in the United Kingdom and 58 769 euro in France, see paragraph 56).