natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ved risikoanalysen i forbindelse med regnskabsafslutningen og rsplanen for de forskellige r bliver der dog taget hensyn til de modtagne oplysninger. 
However, the clearance-of-accounts risk-analysis procedure and annual plan for the different years do indeed take into account the information received.
31.7.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 214/35 c) Indtil nu har systemet for anerkendelse af de nationale databaser som helt operationelle virket sledes: Efter en dybtgende gennemgang af medlemsstaternes oplysninger aflžgger GD SANCO et besżg p stedet for at f en fuldstžndig demonstration og en grundig drżftelse. 
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/35 (c) To date, the system for recognition of the fully operational character of the national databases has worked as follows. After an in-depth analysis of the information submitted by the Member States, DG SANCO carries out an on-the-spot visit with the aim of having a full demonstration and a thorough discussion.
GD SANCO undersżger for tiden, hvordan det bedst kan inddrage kontrol af, om databaserne er operationelle, i sine overordnede kontrol-og inspektionsfunktioner. d) Revisionsretten bemžrker, at GD SANCO og GD AGRI accepterede forskellige minimumskontrolsatser. 
DG SANCO is examining how best to incorporate checks on the operational character of the databases in its overall control and inspection functions. (d) The Court notes differing minimum inspection rates accepted by DG SANCO and DG AGRI.
Med hensyn til kontrol efter reglerne om identifikation og registrering af kvžg kan medlemsstater, der rder over en fuldt operationel database med effektive faciliteter for krydskontrol, nżjes med en kontrolsats p 5 %. 
However, as regards the inspections conducted in respect of the bovine identification and registration regulations, Member States with a fully operational database and effective cross-checking facilities may consider a 5 % inspection rate.
GD AGRI anvender i princippet det samme kriterium. 
DG AGRI applies the same criteria in principle.
De betydelige žndringer i IFKS-lovgivningen i form af forordning (EF) nr. 1678/98 og (EF) nr. 2801/1999 efter indfżrelsen af henholdsvis identifikation af kvžg og Agenda 2000 viser klart, at afdelingen for regnskabsafslutning bidrager til bde at udstikke en politik og udstede vejledninger, da dens aktiviteter direkte beror p et detaljeret og ajourfżrt kendskab til den nationale gennemfżrelse af IFKS. 
The Court suggests that the Commission has allocated too few resources to the general management and administration of theIACS.ThesignificantamendmentstotheIACSlegislationin the form of Regulation (EC) No 1678/98 and Regulation (EC) No 2801/1999, following developments with regard to bovine identification and Agenda 2000 respectively, clearly demonstrate the role of clearance of accounts in both policy-setting and guidance, activities directly benefiting from its detailed and up-to-date knowledge of national implementation.
Ovennžvnte betydelige žndringer i IFKS-lovgivningen kržvede desuden en hel ržkke fortolkninger og vejledninger, som Kommissionen tilsendte medlemsstaterne, og som Revisionsretten har fet forelagt. 
The abovementioned significant amendments to the IACS legislation furthermore necessitated a whole series of interpretations and guidance issued by the Commission to all Member States, whichhasbeengiventotheCourt.
Desuden blev der i brevene med revisionsbemžrkninger fremsat omfattende henstillinger bde om overholdelse af reglerne og praktisk kontrol. 
Moreover, audit observations letters sent to Member States systematically make extensive recommendations both on regulatory compliance and on practical control.
44. a) Kommissionen anmodede alle medlemsstater om at fremlžgge oplysninger om tolerancerne for hver af de metoder, der blev anvendt i 2000. 
44. (a) The Commission requested all Member States to provide information on the tolerances for each of the methods used in 2000.
Der arbejdes hen imod en endnu mere homogen praksis, s der kan tages hensyn til fremskridtene i moderne teknologi c) Ifżlge Kommissionens forordning (EŻF) nr. 3887/92 s vel som Rdets forordning (EF) nr 1258/1999 har medlemsstaterne en meget klar forpligtelse til at inddrive uretmžssige belżb, inklusive dem, der blev udbetalt for tidligere regnskabsr. 
An even more homogeneous approach is being developed to take account of progress made in modern technology. (c) CommissionRegulation(EEC)No3887/92andCouncilRegu-lation (EC) No 1258/1999 establish very clear obligations on Member States to recover undue payments, including those paid for earlier claim years.
Kommissionen vil yderligere sżge at opn en mere konsekvent og ensartet praksis i medlemsstaterne. 
The Commission will further see to a more consequent and uniform application by Member States.
De svagheder, som Revisionsretten nžvnte i litra a), b), og c), blev behandlet under regnskabsafslutningen og gav i nogle tilfžlde anledning til finansielle korrektioner, mens andre tilfžlde stadig er til behandling. 
The weaknesses mentioned by the Court under points (a), (b) and (c) have been subject to a clearance-of-accounts procedure and in some cases given rise to financial corrections, whereas the other cases are still under an ongoing procedure.
Det er meningen under revisionen af forordning (EŻF) nr. 3887/92 at drżfte behovet for en mere specifik bestemmelse om gensidig bistand med medlemsstaterne. 
It is planned that the review of Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 will involve discussing with the Member States the need for a more specific provision on mutual assistance.
Det er muligt at efterprżve overholdelsen af denne betingelse ved kontrol af udvalgte satellitbilleder fra perioden 1986-1991, der fastslr markanvendelsen pr. 31. december 1991. 
It is possible to verify compliance with this condition by checking selected satellite images from the period 1986 to 1991, which identify land use on 31 December 1991.
I forbindelse med prispakken 1998/99 havde Kommissionen lovet at ophžve kravet om, at udtagne jorder skal have vžret i bedriftens eje i to r, for at forenkle reglerne. 
With a view to simplifying the rules, the Commission promised, in the framework of the 1998/99 price package, to withdraw the requirement that set-aside land must have been part of the holding for two years.
Kommissionen offentliggjorde bevidst den pgžldende forordning efter afslutningen af perioden for jordudtagningen med henblik p dens anvendelse fra det fżlgende produktionsr for at undg at favorisere producenter, der havde indgivet urigtige ansżgninger. 
The Commission deliberately published the Regulation after the end of the period of set-aside, with a view to its application from the following crop year, to avoid favourable treatment for producers who did not fulfil the earlier requirements.
Forordning (EF) nr 2490/98 var, som det siges i dens begrundelse, kun en pržcisering. 
As the explanatory memorandum states, Regulation (EC) No 2490/98 was merely intended for clarification.
Hvis det er rigtigt, at uhensigtsmžssig krydskontrol forżger risikoen for uretmžssige udbetalinger, er det ogs klart, at der kan ansżges for en ko flere gange om ret, s lžnge koen udskiftes med en anden. 
While agreeing that inadequate cross-checking increases the risk of overpayment, we would point out that an individual cow may be covered by several applications, provided it is suitably replaced.
Under disse forhold er det udskiftningen, der skal kontrolleres, da en gentaget ansżgning ikke i sig selv er ulovlig. 
In the circumstances, it is the replacement that must be checked, since multiple application is not in itself irregular.
Kommissionen vžrdsžtter dog Revisionsrettens bemžrkning i s henseende og bekržfter, at den rent faktisk rettede opmžrksomheden mod dette aspekt i medlemsstaterne, inklusive de nžvnte medlemsstater. 
However, the Commission appreciates the CourtŐs remark, and confirms that is has indeed paid attention to this aspect in the Member States, including those mentioned.
C 214/36 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 31.7.2001 52. 
C 214/36 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 52.
Efter artikel 9, stk. 2, i forordning (EŻF) nr. 
According to Article 9(2), reductions are applicable only at crop group level.
Kommissionen deler ikke Revisionsrettens mening om, at EF-bestemmelserne minimi-serer afvigelser. 
The Commission does not share the CourtŐs view that the Community provisions minimise anomalies.
I artikel 6 i forordning (EŻF) nr. 3887/92 er det fastsat, at hvis der findes fejl i den kontrollerede stikprżve, skal stikprżven udvides. 
Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 states that where errors are found in the sample checked, the sample shall be extended.
Medlemsstaterne blev i et arbejdsdokument opfordret til at opmle alle marker inden for samme afgrżde-gruppe, s snart der afslżres afvigelser. 
Member States have been recommended in a working document to measure all the parcels within the same crop group, as soon as discrepancies are revealed.
Kommissionen er klar over forsżget p at undg de fulde sanktioner og undersżger, om den skal fastsžtte bestemmelser, nr den kodificerer IFKS-forordningen. 
The Commission is aware of this problem of avoiding the full effect of sanctions, and is examining the need for relevant provisions in the forthcoming consolidated Commission Regulation on the IACS.
Fżlgende skal tages i betragtning: Ń Kommissionens vurdering af tilfžlde, som medlemsstaterne klassificerer som forsžtligt urigtige anmeldelser, viser, at de ofte vedrżrer ansżgere, der anmelder et areal, der slet ikke findes. 
The following has to be taken into account: Ń theCommissionhasfound,whenassessingcasesclassifiedby Member States as false declarations made intentionally, that they often involve applicants declaring an area when there is no area at all.
Det nžste rs sanktion er derfor uden virkning, og at fastsžtte en klausul om, at et areal lig med det, der blev afvist det fżrste r, ogs vil blive afvist i det nžste r, ville ganske enkelt ikke vžre muligt. 
Therefore, the second yearŐs sanction is without effect and it is not feasible simply to exclude an area equal to that which was rejected in the first year.
Hvis den jord, der ansżges om stżtte for, og som afvises, er leaset i det pgžldende r, og leasingkontrakten udlżber ved rets udgang, vil ejeren (eller den person, der har retten) blive direkte berżrt af sanktionen. 
If the rejected aid application related to land that was leased in the current year, on a contract terminating at the end of the year, the sanction would be imposed on the owner (or person then entitled).
Dette rejser en ržkke juridiske problemer. 
This raises a number of legal problems.
Kommissionen har allerede vedtaget forordninger og udstukket vejledninger for at n sit ml med bedre forvaltning og kontrol. b) Revisionsretten har ret i sin pstand om, at lofterne for oksekżdspržmier endnu ikke er blevet tjekket definitivt. 
The Commission has already taken regulatory and guidance steps to meet its objectives of better management and control. (b) The Court is correct to say that ceilings on bovine premiums have not yet been definitively checked.
Disse tjek kan i kraft af deres art (udbetalinger kan foretages helt op til to r efter ansżgningsperioden) fżrst foretages ifżlge den kržvede revisionsstandard i ansżgningsr + 2. c) Selv om statistikkerne over dyrepržmier ikke figurerer i nogen formel sammenfattende rapport, vurderes de og underkastes streng kontrol p stedet hvert r, hvilket fżrer til talrige finansielle korrektioner for de fleste medlemsstater under regnskabsafslutningen. 
By their nature (pay-mentscanbemadeuptotwoyearsaftertheclaimperiod) these checks can only be carried out to the required audit standard in claim year + 2. (c) Although not appearing in any formal summary report, ani-malpremiumstatisticsareevaluatedandsubjectedtorigor- ous on-the-spot audit every year, leading to numerous financial corrections under the clearance-of-accounts procedure in most Member States.
At nogle medlemsstater undlader at fremlžgge statistikker trods anmodning, er beklageligt, men denne undladelse blev korrigeret via žndringen af forordning (EF) nr. 2801/1999. d) Revisionsretten bemžrker, at de nationale attesterende organer kan anvendes til at analysere IFKS-gennmfżrelsen. 
It is regrettable that some Member States failtosupplystatisticsonrequest,butthisfailinghasbeen corrected via the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 2801/ 1999. (d) The Court observes that national certifying bodies could be usedtoanalysetheIACSimplementation.
De attesterende organer rapporterer om procedurer for at sikre overholdelse af forordningerne. 
Certifying bodies report on procedures to ensure compliance with Regulations.
I forordning (EF) nr. 1663/95 stilles der hverken krav om rapportering af den generelle gennemfżrelse af IFKS eller om sžrlige statistikker, da forordningen ikke direkte berżrer regnskabsafslutningen, hvor det attesterende organs arbejde udnyttes. 
However, Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 does not specifically require reporting either of the general implementation of the IACS, or of statistics in particular, because it is not directly concerned with the accounting clearance, for which the certifying bodyŐs work is used.
Revisionsrettens bemžrkning om, at de attesterende organer kan vurdere IFKS-gennmfżrelsen, tages dog i betragtning for en kommende aktion. 
However, the CourtŐs observation that certifying bodies might evaluate the IACS implementation is noted for future action.
55-59. 
55 to 59.
Revisionsrettens bemžrkninger er baseret p statistikker, som Kommissionens tjenestegrene har tilsendt den, og ligner generelt meget dem, der fremsžttes under regnskabsafslutningen. 
The CourtŐs observations are based on statistics supplied to it by Commission departments, and are generally very similar to those formulated under the clearance of accounts.
Nr en medlemsstat ikke fremlžgger de żnskede statistikker eller gżr det ufyldestgżrende, tages der systematisk hensyn hertil under regnskabsafslutningen. 
Where Member States fail to supply some or all of the required statistics, this failing is systematically taken into account under clearance-of-accounts procedures.
56. b) Nogle medlemsstater havde en fejlrate p 0 %, da alle tilfžlde af afvigelser efter administrativ kontrol blev efterfulgt af kontrol p stedet. c) Dette afspejler korrekt virkeligheden, og hovedrsagen er forskelle mellem medlemsstaterne og standarden af det kortma-teriale, de har til rdighed. d) I lighed med c) ovenfor skyldes forskellene mellem medlemsstaterne ved afslżring af og rapportering om alvorlige fejl ofte forskelle i de indfżrte kontrolsystemer. 
56. (b) Some Member States had an error rate of 0 %, as all cases with discrepancies after administrative controls are followed up by field inspections. (c) This reflects correctly the situation in reality and the main reason is differences among Member States and the standard of the map material they have at their disposal. (d) Similarly to point (c), differences between Member States in the detection and reporting of serious errors are often due to the varying control systems put in place.
For bde markafgrżder og dyrepržmier undersżges sdanne forskelle i forbindelse med regnskabsafslutningen. 
For both the arable crops and animal premium sectors, such differences are investigated in the context of the clearance of accounts procedure.
58-59. 
58 and 59.
Alle medlemsstater blev systematisk anmodet om statistikker over kontrolresultater (administrativ kontrol og kontrol p stedet). 
Statistics on control results (administrative and on-the-spot checks) were systematically requested from all Member States.
Den erfaring, der blev indvundet, efterhnden som flere ordninger blev omfattet af IFKS, betżd, at de tabeller, der oprindeligt blev benyttet til at indsamle oplysninger, mtte opdateres. 
Experience gained as more schemes were covered by the IACS meant that the tables initially used to collect information had to be updated.
For arealstżtte blev der for at undg en stor spredning i de rapporterede statistikker udarbejdet et fortrykt spżrgeskema med detaljerede forklaringer, som medlemsstaterne har skulle udfylde siden 1995. 
In order to avoid very wide variations in the statistics reported for area aid, a special pre-printed questionnaire was created with detailed explanations, which the Member States have been asked to complete since 1995.
Det har derfor vžret muligt at analysere og sammenligne alle medlemsstaters kontrolresultater og konkludere, at den administrative kontrol og kontrollen p stedet rapporteres ensartet. 
It has therefore been possible to analyse and compare the results of all Member States and to conclude that administrative controls and field inspections are being reported uniformly.
Behovet for at rette mere opmžrksomhed mod nogle oksekżds-pržmiers sžrlige art blev allerede ptalt i 1999 og betones yderligere i 2000. 
The need for more attention to be paid to the specific nature of some bovine premium schemes was already addressed in 1999 andisbeingfurtherdevelopedfor2000.
31.7.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 214/37 60. 
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/37 60.
Der er modtaget rapporter om kontrol i 1998 fra de fleste medlemsstater (Danmark, Spanien, Frankrig, Italien, Nederlandene, Żstrig, Portugal, Finland, Sverige og Det Forenede Kongerige). 
The report on controls carried out in 1998 has been received from most Member States (Denmark, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom).
Graden af rapporternes fuldstžndighed varierede dog meget. 
However, the degree of completeness was very varied.
Rapporten om kontrol i 1999 er blevet modtaget fra alle medlemsstater undtagen Gržkenland. 
The report on controls carried out in 1999 has been received from all Member States except Greece.
Som fastsat i forordning (EF) nr. 2630/97 har Kommissionen udstukket en model for medlemsstaternes rsrapport om resultaterne af kontrollen i oksekżdssektoren med hensyn til EF-bestemmelserne om identifikation og registrering af kvžg i Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 
As provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2630/97 the Commission has laid down the model for the annual reports from Member States on the results of controls made in the bovine sector regarding Community provisions for identification and registration in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1898/2000 of 7 September 2000.
Evaluering af IFKS og tilsynet med gennemfżrelsen 61. 
Evaluation of the IACS and enforcing implementation 61.
Kommissionen er enig i betydningen af plidelige og rettidige oplysninger fra medlemsstaterne, og den tager hensyn til deres effektivitet, nr den vurderer forhold i forbindelse med regnskabsafslutningen. 
The Commission agrees on the importance of reliable and timely information from the Member States and it takes their performance in this matter into account when assessing situations in the framework of the clearance of accounts.
Det skal endvidere understreges, at regnskaber fżrst afsluttes, nr de statistiske oplysninger er modtaget og undersżgt for mangler 62. 
Furthermore, accounts are not cleared until statistical information has been received and scrutinised for any shortcomings. 62.
Kommissionen har hidtil ikke foretaget nogen form for detaljeret costbenefitanalyse for gennemfżrelsen af IFKS. 
The Commission has not so far carried out any kind of detailed cost/benefit analyses concerning implementation of the IACS.
I betragtning af det yderst store antal udgifter, der skal kontrolleres, har Kommissionen vžret mere optaget af at f IFKS til at virke end at vurdere dets costbenefit. 
In view of the extremely high proportion of expenditure to be controlled, the Commission has been more concerned with making the IACS work, rather than with evaluating its cost-effectiveness.
Af sžrlig betydning er den afskržkkende virkning af IFKS-reglerne om sanktioner, en virkning, der er vanskelig at sžtte tal p. 
Of particular importance is the dissuasive/deterrent effect of the IACS rules on sanctions, which is difficult to quantify.
Ydermere er IFKSŐ rolle ved afslżring og afvisning af stżtteansżgninger i begyndelsesfasen (dvs. fżr de indtržder i selve systemet) nžsten usynlig, selv om den er meget effektiv. 
Furthermore, the IACS plays a very low-key but highly effective role in the detection of aid claims for rejection in the initial stages (i.e. before they enter the system proper).
Kun at anskue kontrollens costbenefit ud fra et finansielt aspekt, er for snžvert et perspektiv. 
Viewing the cost-effectiveness of checks solely in financial terms is too narrow a perspective.
Kontrollen har en bredere betydning ved, at den sikrer, at udgifterne er afholdt efter EF-reglerne, og derfor hjžlper til at sżrge for, at de żkonomiske ml for de fžlles markedsordninger ns. 
Checks have a wider importance, in making sure that expenditure is incurred in conformity with Community legislation, thereby helping to ensure that the economic objectives of the common market organisations are achieved.
Revisionsretten hžvder, at Kommissionen ikke systematisk rapporterer om IFKS-gennemfżrelsen. 
The Court states that the Commission does not routinely report on the IACS implementation.
Det skal nžvnes, at der ikke er nogen forpligtelse til at fremlžgge en sdan rapport, selv om en rapport om IFKS-gennemfżrelsen rent faktisk blev forelagt Europa-Parlamentet i 1998 og indeholder opdateringer med henblik p dechargeproceduren. 
It must be mentioned that there is no obligation to do so, although a report on the IACS implementation was indeed sent to the European Parliament in 1998, with subsequent updates on discharge procedures.
Af stżrre betydning er Kommissionens lżbende kontrol og rapportering af IFKS-situationen. 
Of greater significance is the CommissionŐs ongoing monitoring and reporting of the IACS situation.
Kommissionen tager hensyn til den kržvede kontrols gennemfżrelse og effektivitet, og i sine breve med bemžrkninger foreslr den regelmžssigt de kontrollerede medlemsstater forbedringer. 
The Commission takes into account the effectiveness and efficiency of the required controls, and in its observation letters regularly suggests improvements to the audited Member States.
Desuden vurderes IFKS-gennemfżrelsen i de fleste af de revisionsrapporter, som Kommissionens tjenestegrene udarbejder, enten delvist eller mere fuldstžndigt, og der redegżres detaljeret for alle afslżringer af svagheder og/overtrždelser af reglerne i den sammenfattende rapport om regnskabsafslutningen, der udkommer flere gange om ret, og derved ikke blot ppeges de konstaterede problemer, men ogs Kommissionens opfżlgning af problemerne. 
Furthermore, most audit reports drafted by the CommissionŐs departments evaluate the IACS implementation, either partially or more completely, and all findings of weaknesses and/or non-compliance are illustrated in great detail in the clearance-of-accounts summary reports that appear several times each year, providing a source of information not only on problems noted but also on follow-up action taken by the Commission.
Kommissionen er enig i, at selv i de medlemsstater, hvor IFKS er blevet gennemfżrt p tilfredsstillende vis, bestr der stadig svagheder, der behandles i forbindelse med regnskabsafslutningen. 
The Commission agrees that, even for those Member States where the IACS has been satisfactorily implemented, weaknesses still exist and are dealt with in the context of the clearance-of-accounts procedure.
Nr dette er sagt, skal det erindres om, at regnskabsafslutningen er en lovhjemlet procedure, der skal beskytte bde EF-budgettets og medlemsstaternes interesser. 
This said, it must be recalled that the clearance-of-accounts procedure is a regulatory procedure, designed to protect the interests of both Community budget and Member States.
Ved kun at fokusere p 1998 tillžgger Revisionsretten ikke regnskabsafslutningens fortlżbende karakter behżrig vžgt. 
In focusing on 1998 alone, the Court does not give due weight to the ongoing nature of the clearance of accounts.