natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen foretager systematiske midtvejsevalueringer og efterfżlgende evalueringer af anvendelsen af EU-midler. 
The Commission carries out systematic mid-term and ex-post evaluations for EU funds.
I forbindelse med midtvejsevalueringerne stżtter resultaterne af evalueringerne styringen af midlerne, hvilket gżr det muligt at tilpasse dem til en žndret situation inden for rammerne af retsgrundlaget. 
At mid-term, the outcomes of evaluations support the steering of the funds, allowing adapting the funds to a changing context in the boundaries of the legal basis.
I forbindelse med de efterfżlgende evalueringer indgr evalueringerne i politikudvikling. 
Ex-post, the outcomes of evaluations feed the policy development.
I betragtning af at trusselsbilledet og medlemsstaternes behov hurtigt kan žndre sig, er der behov for en hurtig politisk reaktion, uden at dybtgende evalueringer af tidligere foranstaltninger nżdvendigvis er tilgžngelige p dette tidspunkt. 
However, given that the threat picture and Member StatesŐ needs can change quickly swift policy responses are required without in depth evaluations of previous actions necessarily being available at that moment.
Endvidere blev Kommissionens samlede stżtte taget op til fornyet gennemgang i forbindelse med den omfattende vurdering af sikkerhedspolitikkerne, der blev offentliggjort i juli 2017, hvormed Kommissionen besvarede anmodningen fra Europa-Parlamentet. 
Furthermore, its overall support was reviewed in the comprehensive assessment of security policies published in July 2017 with which the Commission responded to the request by the European Parliament.
30. a) Mlene for Kommissionens politik for forebyggelse og bekžmpelse af radikalisering er fastlagt i de relevante politikdokumenter. 
30. (a) The objectives of the Commission's policy on preventing and countering radicalisation are set out in the relevant policy documents.
Disse er nżdvendigvis af mere generel karakter, mens de mere konkrete ml er fastlagt under de relevante initiativer. b) Selv om de EU-midler, der anvendes, ikke er knyttet til specifikke indikatorer og ml vedrżrende radikalisering, evalueres effektiviteten og rentabiliteten af projekter vedrżrende radikalisering gennem programindikatorer og specifikke indikatorer, der afspejler omfanget af og mlene for de forskellige finansieringsprogrammer/fonde. 
These are necessarily of a more general nature with more concrete objectives being set out under the relevant initiatives. (b) Even if EU funds used do not have specific indicators and targets relating to radicalisation, the effectiveness and value for money of projects addressing radicalisation are evaluated through programme and specific indicators that reflect the scope and goals of the different funding programmes/funds.
En sdan evaluering udfżres systematisk for hver fond. 
Such evaluation is carried out systematically under each fund.
F.eks. mles programmer ssom Erasmus +, der stżtter kvalitetsbetonet inklusiv uddannelse og fremme af fžlles vžrdier, p baggrund af deres effektivitet gennem program-og sektorspecifikke ml og indikatorer. 
For instance programmes such as Erasmus+ supporting quality inclusive education and the promotion of common values, are measured for their effectiveness through programme and sector-specific objectives and indicators.
3 c) En omfattende vurdering af EU's sikkerhedspolitik i juli 2017, der omfattede oplysninger om fonde og omkostninger, gav en samlet oversigt over alle foranstaltninger til bekžmpelse af radikalisering bortset fra EU-aktioner, der forvaltes af medlemsstaterne (se svaret p punkt 26). d) Det ville vžre meget vanskeligt at give et fuldstžndigt billede af omkostningerne til bekžmpelse af radikalisering, navnlig for s vidt angr foranstaltninger, der forfżlger flere ml, samt aktioner med forskellige tidshorisonter. 
Costing estimates are usually related to such broader, education-related objectives rather than to radicalisation as such given their indirect contribution to preventing radicalisation. (c) A comprehensive overview of all counter-radicalisation actions, with the exception of EU actions managed by the Member States, was provided in the framework of the July 2017 comprehensive assessment of EU security policy providing information about funds and costs (see reply to paragraph 26). (d) It would be extremely challenging to fully set out the costs of addressing radicalisation, in particular for actions pursuing multiple purposes and for actions having different timelines.
Kommissionen ppeger, at politikdokumenter ssom de forskellige meddelelser om radikalisering ikke skal omfatte specifikke og udtżmmende henvisninger til de finansielle midler, der stilles til rdighed for bestemte foranstaltninger. 
Commission points out that policy documents such as the different Communications on radicalisation shall not include specific and exhaustive references to the financial means made available for certain actions.
Kommissionens meddelelser er ikke dokumenter, i hvilke der indgs eller bebudes specifikke finansielle forpligtelser. 
Commission Communications are not the documents in which specific financial engagements are recorded or announced.
Mling af effektiviteten af forebyggende foranstaltninger er i sagens natur vanskelig og kržver et tžt samarbejde mellem Kommissionen, medlemsstaterne, de enkelte interessenter og forskere. 
Measuring the effectiveness of preventive actions is intrinsically difficult and requires close cooperation between the Commission, Member States, individual stakeholders and researchers.
Det er en lżbende proces med evalueringsteknikker, der undersżges og anvendes gradvist. 
It is a gradual process with evaluation techniques being progressively explored and applied.
Som ppeget i Kommissionens samlede vurdering af sikkerhedspolitikkerne er der behov for bedre at evaluere resultaterne og effektiviteten og for, at Kommissionen lżbende undersżger mulighederne for bedre at pvise effektiviteten af sine foranstaltninger. 
As pointed out in the CommissionŐs comprehensive assessment of security policies, there is a need to better evaluate results and effectiveness and for the Commission to continue to explore ways to better demonstrate effectiveness of its actions.
Kommissionen mener, at vurderingen af de resultater, som RAN-ekspertisecentret (CoE) har opnet, er mere omfattende end en simpel liste over arrangementer og aktiviteter, men indeholder en vurdering af hver enkelt opgave, sdan som det klart fremgr af RAN's rlige situationsrapport for 2016 (april 2016). 
The Commission considers that the appraisal of the performance of the RAN CoE goes beyond a mere listing of events and activities but contains an evaluation of each task, as the RAN Annual progress report for 2016 (APR 2016) clearly demonstrates.
Udvžlgelsesproceduren i forbindelse med EU's finansieringsinstrumenter omfatter en vurdering af robustheden af den evaluerings-og overvgningsstrategi, som ansżgerne har foreslet, og indgr i analysen af styrker og svagheder ved de forskellige projekter. 
The selection process under EU funding instruments includes an assessment of the robustness of the evaluation and monitoring strategy proposed by the applicants and is part of the analysis of the strength and weaknesses of the different projects.
Denne vurdering deles med ansżgerne for at tilskynde dem til at forbedre opbygningen af deres projekt. 
This assessment is shared with the applicants in order to encourage them to improve their project's construction.
Den indgr ogs i Kommissionens strategi for overvgning af projektet indtil dets afslutning. 
It also feeds into the Commission's monitoring strategy of the project when it is ongoing.
Kvaliteten af den evaluerings-og overvgningsstrategi, der indgr i et projekt, er dog ikke det eneste element, der lžgges til grund for dets udvžlgelse. 
However, the quality of the evaluation and monitoring strategy embedded in a project is not the only element to decide for its selection.
Projekter udvžlges fżrst og fremmest p grundlag af deres relevans for det politikml, der er fastsat i indkaldelserne af forslag, og deres EU-mervžrdi (f.eks. om de involverer eller pvirker flere medlemsstater). 
Indeed, projects are firstly selected based on their relevance to the policy objective set in the calls for proposals and their EU added value (e.g. whether they involve or impact on several Member States).
Endvidere betyder manglen p effektivitetsindikatorer ikke, at effektiviteten ikke kan vurderes, da projekterne skal omfatte en detaljeret beskrivelse, der gżr det muligt for Kommissionen at vurdere, om projektet har ydet et effektivt bidrag til opfyldelsen af politikmlet. 
In addition, the absence of effectiveness indicators does not imply that the effectiveness cannot be assessed, since projects are required to provide a detailed narrative report which allows the Commission to assess whether the project made an effective contribution to the achievement of the policy goal.
Betalinger for projekter, der medfinansieres af EU, er baseret p, om projektet blev gennemfżrt i overensstemmelse med dets oprindelige ml. 
Payments for EU co-funded projects are based on whether the project was implemented in compliance with its initial objectives.
Som led i denne endelige vurdering evaluerer Kommissionen en ržkke elementer, herunder resultaternes kvalitet, nyttevžrdi, og hvorvidt de kan overfżres. 
As part of this final assessment, the Commission evaluates a number of elements, including quality, usefulness and transferability of the results.
Evalueringerne af de enkelte projekter indgr i den generelle evaluering af det finansielle program, der udfżres med bistand fra eksterne evalueringseksperter. 
Evaluations of individual projects feed then in the general evaluation of the financial programme, which is carried out with the help of external evaluators.
For eksempel opfattes det overordnede ISEC-program, de individuelle indkaldelser og projektresultaterne generelt meget positivt af medlemsstaterne og interessenterne, sdan som det fremgr af den efterfżlgende evaluering af ISEC-programmet for forebyggelse og bekžmpelse af kriminalitet 2007-2013. 
For example, the ISEC programme overall, the individual calls and the project results are generally very positively perceived by Member States and stakeholders as stated in the ex-post evaluation of "Prevention and fight against crime" 2007-2013 Programme ISEC.
Endelig suppleres evalueringerne af andre vžrktżjer, gennem hvilke Kommissionen styrker evidensgrundlaget for de enkelte tiltag. 
Finally, the evaluations are complemented by other tools through which the Commission strengthens the evidence base for individual interventions.
For eksempel bidrager de vžrktżjer, der er udviklet af det EU-finansierede projekt IMPACT, til, at projektlederne kan foretage bedre evalueringer af effektiviteten af deres foranstaltninger. 
For instance through the tools developed by the EU funded project IMPACT, project managers are helped to carry out better evaluations of the effectiveness of their actions.
Endvidere foreslr Kommissionen f.eks. med hensyn til specifikke EU-finansierede projekter (ssom dem, der skal finansieres under programmet om styrkelse af civilsamfundet) en efterfżlgende evaluering af programmet p grund af den innovative karakter af alternative fortžllinger og modfortžllinger. 
Furthermore, for instance for specific EU funded projects (such as those to be funded under the Civil Society Empowerment Programme) the Commission foresees an ex-post evaluation of the programme given the innovative nature of alternative and counter narratives.
Desuden vil Kommissionen som led i 4 opfżlgningen af den forelżbige rapport fra HLCEG-R sammen med medlemsstaterne undersżge, hvordan man bedre kan evaluere relevante programmer og tiltag. 
And as part of the follow up on the interim report of the HLCEG-R, the Commission will explore together with Member States how to better evaluate relevant programmes and interventions.
Kommissionen har sammen med Europol anmodet internetvirksomhederne om oplysninger om fjernelse af terrorrelateret indhold, men kun modtaget begržnset feedback. 
The Commission has, along with Europol, been requesting data on the removal of terrorist content from the internet companies with only limited feedback.
Desuden vil den applikation til administration af internetformidling, som Europol har udviklet, bidrage til at sikre koordinering med medlemsstaterne og dermed mindske risikoen for overlapning. 
Furthermore, the Internet Referral Management Application which Europol has developed will help ensure co-ordination with Member States, thereby reducing the likelihood of duplication. With regard to addressing the 4
Med hensyn til hndtering af "whack-a-mole"-effekten hber Kommissionen, at den database over hashtags, som virksomhederne selv har udviklet, vil bidrage til at forhindre, at terrorrelateret indhold genuploades og videreformidles. 
whack-a-mole effect, the Commission hopes that the Database of Hashes, developed by the companies themselves, will help prevent the re-uploading of terrorist content and its dissemination.
I den forbindelse har Europol inden for rammerne af forummet tilbudt sin stżtte med henblik p at sikre optimeringen af dette vžrktżj. 
In that respect, under the Forum, Europol has offered its support in ensuring the optimisation of this tool.
EU IRU (EU's internetindberetningsenhed) har indfżrt en skaldt konfliktafvžrgelsesprocedure for at sikre, at medlemsstaterne har indflydelse p, hvilket indhold EU IRU indberetter til virksomhederne, s man undgr negative virkninger af indberetninger og efterfżlgende fjernelser, som kunne bringe undersżgelserne i fare. 
The EU IRU (Internet Referral Unit) has a so-called de-confliction procedure in place to ensure that Member States have a say in what content is referred by the EU IRU to companies, thus avoiding any negative effects of referrals and subsequent removals which could jeopardise investigations.
Endvidere fokuserer EU IRU p propaganda p internettet, som terroristerne żnsker at bruge til at tiltržkke s mange tilhžngere som muligt. 
Furthermore, the EU IRU is focusing on online propaganda which the terrorists want to use to attract as many followers as possible.
Den hemmelige n-til-n-kommunikation finder normalt sted senere i processen. 
The one-to-one clandestine communication tends to happen later in the process.
Hvis disse forebyggelsesmetoder skal vžre helt effektive, kunne det faktisk mindske de operationelle partneres byrde p lžngere sigt, da der ville vžre fžrre undersżgelser. 
If these prevention methods are to be fully effective, it could actually decrease the burden on operational partners in the longer term, as there would be fewer investigations.
Ovennžvnte foranstaltninger er i trd med den handlingsplan for EU's internetforum, der blev vedtaget i juli 2017. Foranstaltninger omfatter ogs rapporteringsordninger baseret p en ržkke indikatorer. 
The above actions are in line with the EU Internet Forum Action Plan agreed in July 2017; the actions also include reporting arrangements based on a number of indicators.
Kommissionens henstilling vedrżrende ulovligt indhold p internettet bygger p de fremskridt, der er gjort inden for rammerne af EU's internetforum, og omfatter rapporteringsordninger 36. 
The Commission's recommendation on illegal content online builds on the progress under the EU Internet Forum and establishes reporting arrangements. 36.
Kommissionen har plagt RAN's ekspertisecenter (RAN CoE) at aflžgge rapport om effektiviteten af sine foranstaltninger. 
The Commission has tasked the RAN Center of Excellence (RAN CoE) to report on the effectiveness of its actions.
I henhold til rammekontrakten anmodes RAN CoE om i sin kvartalsvise statusrapport og navnlig i de rlige statusrapporter at aflžgge rapport om, hvordan dets foranstaltninger bidrager til at n de tilstržbte politikml. 
Under the framework contract, the RAN CoE is asked to report in its Quarterly Progress Reports and in particular the Annual Progress Reports (APR) on how its actions contribute to achieving policy objectives pursued.
Fra april 2017 indeholder statusrapporten derfor en sdan evaluering for hver opgave. 
From 2017, the APR therefore contains under each task such an evaluation.
Disse rapporter opregner ikke "kun aktiviteter". 
These reports do not list Ňonly activitiesÓ.
Derudover udfżrer RAN spżrgeundersżgelser (selv om det ikke sker systematisk), navnlig i forbindelse med visse (centrale) arrangementer. 
In addition, the RAN carries out surveys (even if not in a systematic manner) in particular in relation to some (key) events.
Endvidere vurderer Kommissionen sammen med medlemmerne af RAN CoE's styringsgruppe fremskridt, udfordringer og muligheder for forbedringer p grundlag af en evaluering af det arbejde, der udfżres af RAN CoE (f.eks. med hensyn til at n ud til de relevante interessenter og mulighederne for bedre formidling og for at overfżre erfaringer). 
Furthermore, the Commission assesses together with the members of the RAN CoE Steering Committee progress, challenges and scope for improvement based on an evaluation of the work of the RAN CoE (e.g. in terms of outreach to the relevant stakeholders, scope for improving dissemination and transferability of learnings).
Disse mżder finder sted kvartalsvist. 
These Steering Committee meetings take place on a quarterly basis.
KONKLUSIONER OG ANBEFALINGER 40. 
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 40.
Siden 2017 har Kommissionen inden for rammerne af taskforcen vedrżrende sikkerhedsunionen og dens sžrlige undergruppe om radikalisering forbedret sin oversigt over EU-finansierede foranstaltninger og er nu i stand til at identificere synergier mellem forskellige fonde og aktioner. 
Since 2017, within the framework of the Security Union Task Force and its dedicated subgroup on radicalisation, the Commission has improved its overview of EU funded actions and is able to identify synergies between different funds and actions.
Der er blevet udarbejdet en forelżbig oversigt over finansieringsmuligheder og projekter som led i arbejdet i undergruppen om radikalisering under taskforcen for sikkerhedsunionen, som anvendes af tjenesterne med henblik p at identificere synergier og samle relevant viden og relevante erfaringer. 
A first overview of funding possibilities and projects has been established as part of the work of the Security Union Task Force subgroup on radicalisation and is used by the services to identify synergies and pool relevant knowledge and experiences.
Kommissionen vil gerne understrege, at et tžttere samarbejde med medlemsstaterne er en af de konklusioner, som HLCEG-R er net frem til, og som 5 allerede fżlges op af konkrete tiltag (der er f.eks. allerede planlagt politik-og praksisorienterede arrangementer mellem politiske beslutningstagere og fagfolk i 2018). 
The Commission would like to highlight that a closer engagement with Member States is one of the findings of the HLCEG-R, which is already being followed up with concrete steps (e.g. policy and practice events between policymakers and practitioners already scheduled in 2018).
Mlene for Kommissionens politik om forebyggelse og bekžmpelse af radikalisering er fastlagt i de relevante politikdokumenter. 
The objectives of the Commission's policy on preventing and countering radicalisation are set out in the relevant policy documents.
Se Kommissionens svar p punkt 29 og 30. 
Please see Commission replies to paragraphs 29 and 30.
Dette indgr i den generelle evaluering af fondene og programmerne. 
This feeds into the general evaluation of the funds and programmes.
Se Kommissionens svar p punkt 32-36. 
Please see Commission replies to paragraphs 32 to 36.
Anbefaling 3 Kommissionen accepterer anbefaling 3. 
Recommendation 3 The Commission accepts recommendation 3.
Radikalisering er det fžnomen, at personer tilslutter sig ider, der kan f dem til at beg terrorhandlinger. 
Radicalisation is the phenomenon of people embracing ideas which could lead them to commit acts of terrorism.
Kommissionen stżtter medlemsstaternes bestržbelser p at bekžmpe radikalisering, f.eks. gennem udveksling af gode praksis. 
The Commission supports Member States in their efforts to tackle radicalisation, for example through the exchange of good practices.
Til det forml tržkker den p en bred vifte af EU-fonde. 
In doing so it draws on a wide range of EU funds.
Vi undersżgte, om Kommissionen forvaltede sin stżtte godt. 
We examined whether the Commission managed its support well.
Vi konstaterede, at Kommissionen adresserede medlemsstaternes behov og fremmede samarbejde gennem relevante initiativer ssom netvžrket til bevidstgżrelse omkring radikalisering. 
We found that the Commission addressed the needs of Member States and promoted cooperation through relevant initiatives such as the Radicalisation Awareness Network.
Der var imidlertid nogle mangler i Kommissionens overordnede koordinering af aktioner til bekžmpelse af radikalisering og i dens ramme til vurdering af, om dens stżtte er effektiv. 
However, there were some shortfalls in the CommissionŐs overall coordination of actions addressing radicalisation and in its framework for evaluating the effectiveness of its support.
Vi fremsžtter derfor en ržkke anbefalinger om at forbedre Kommissionens koordinering, s den kan udnytte potentielle synergier optimalt, samt at forbedre rammen for resultatvurdering. 
We therefore make a number of recommendations to improve the CommissionŐs coordination so that it can make the most of potential synergies, and to improve the framework for assessing results.
DEN EUROPŽISKE REVISIONSRET 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tlf. +352 4398-1 Kontakt: eca.europa.eu/da/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Websted: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors ŠDen Europžiske Union, 2018. Tilladelse til at anvende eller gengive fotos eller andet materiale, hvortil Den Europžiske Union ikke har ophavsretten, skal indhentes direkte hos indehaveren af ophavsretten. 
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 Enquiries: eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Website: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors Š European Union, 2018 For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the European Union copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders.
DA 2018 Sžrberetning nr. 15 Styrkelse af kapaciteten hos de indre sikkerhedsstyrker i Niger og Mali: Kun begržnsede og langsomme fremskridt (artikel 287, stk. 
EN 2018 Special Report NO 15 Strengthening the capacity of the internal security forces in Niger and Mali: only limited and slow progress (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU)
Denne forvaltningsrevision blev udfżrt af Afdeling III - Foranstaltninger udadtil/Sikkerhed og retfžrdighed, der ledes af Karel Pinxten, medlem af Revisionsretten. 
This performance audit was carried out by Audit Chamber III External actions/Security and justice, headed by ECA Member Karel Pinxten.
Revisionsarbejdet blev ledet af Bettina Jakobsen, medlem af Revisionsretten, med stżtte fra kabinetschef Katja Mattfolk og attach Kim Storup, ledende administrator Beatrix Lesiewicz, opgaveansvarlig Kim Hubl samt revisor Torielle Perreur-Lloyd. 
The audit was led by ECA Member Bettina Jakobsen, supported by Katja Mattfolk, Head of Private Office and Kim Storup, Private Office Attach; Beatrix Lesiewicz, Principal Manager; Kim Hubl, Head of Task and Torielle Perreur-Lloyd, Auditor.
Fra venstre til hżjre: Torielle Perreur-Lloyd, Kim Hubl, Bettina Jakobsen og Katja Mattfolk. 
From left to right: Torielle Perreur-Lloyd, Kim Hubl, Bettina Jakobsen, Katja Mattfolk.