natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
De beslutninger, der er truffet (for rene 2001-2003) omfatter for begge pržmieordningers vedkommende en gradvis reduktion af belžgningsgraden fra 2 SK/ha til 1,8 SK/ha, for den sžrlige oksekżdspržmies vedkommende en betydelig reduktion af de nationale lofter og for ammekopržmiens vedkommende en ny betingelse om et obligatorisk minimumsantal kvier samt midlertidig ophžvelse af muligheden for at omfordele nationale reserverettigheder. 
The decisions taken (covering the period 2001 to 2003) include, for both premium schemes, a progressive reduction of the stocking density from 2 LU/ha to 1,8 LU/ha, for the special beef premium a substantial reduction of the national ceilings and, with regard to the suckler cow scheme, the introduction of a compulsory minimum number of heifers to be kept under this scheme and a suspension of reallocating premiumsŐ rights from the national reserves.
Kommissionen betragter generelt beretningen som en velaf-vejet og objektiv analyse af de tiltag, der er indfżrt og gennemfżrt til bekžmpelse af BSE siden 1998. 
The Commission considers the report in general a fair objective analysis of the BSE measures introduced and implemented since 1998.
Kommissionens tjenestegrene er generelt enige i beretningens konklusioner og anbefalinger, navnlig at ČKommissionens strategi er rigtig, men at der er problemer med medlemsstaternes gennemfżrelse af denÇ (punkt 47). 
The Commission services endorse in general the reportŐs conclusions and recommendations notably that the Commissions strategy is basically sound, but that the implementation is problematic (point 47).
KOMMISSIONENS BSE-STRATEGI 14. 
THE COMMISSIONŐS BSE STRATEGY 14.
Som Retten korrekt ppeger, resulterede kždereaktionen i kżlvandet p de BSE-tilfžlde, der blev konstateret i flere medlemsstater, i et kraftigere fald end nogensinde i forbruget i EU. 
As the Court points out correctly the knock-on effect of the BSE cases detected in several Member States resulted in a never-before-experienced drop in consumption in the Community.
Mange importlande indfżrte forbud mod import fra EU af levende kvžg og kvžgprodukter. 
Numerous importing countries imposed bans on EU imports of live cattle and bovine products.
Situationen forvžrredes dramatisk i februar 2001, hvor sektoren blev ramt af mund-og klovesyge. 
The situation worsened dramatically in February 2001 as the sector was hit by foot-and-mouth disease.
C 324/34 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 20.11.2001 Den centrale mlsžtning med opkżbsordningen med henblik p destruktion var umiddelbart at gengive forbrugerne tilliden til oksekżd ved at indfżre obligatorisk BSE-undersżgelse af kvžg, som blev slagtet i den mellemliggende periode inden ikrafttrždelsen af beslutning 2000/764/EF, samt s vidt muligt at fjerne det markedspres, som forrsagedes af den store ubalance mellem kvžgbestandene p bedrifterne og efterspżrgselen efter kżd. 
C 324/34 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20.11.2001 The major objective of the purchase-for-destruction scheme was to contribute immediately to a restoration of the consumerŐs confidence in beef, by bringing into force the compulsory BSE testing on cattle slaughtered during the intermediate period before the entry into force of Decision 2000/764/EC, as well as to take pressure away, as much as possible, from the market, due to the very significant imbalance between the cattle kept on farm and the demand for meat.
Resultatet af denne politik gav, i forening med aktive interventionsopkżb af oksekżd, s positive resultater, at markedstabet ved udgangen af maj 2001 allerede kunne ansžttes til ca. 10 %. 
The result of this policy, combined with an active purchase into intervention of beef, yielded significant positive results to such an extent that by the end of May 2001 the market loss could already be assessed as some 10 %.
Det er korrekt, at de finansielle omkostninger ved denne ordning er lavere end interventionsopkżb af oksekżd. 
It is true to say that the financial cost of this scheme is lower than the purchase of beef into intervention.
Men det er ogs vigtigt at understrege, at interventionsopkżb kun gžlder oksekżd fra handyr, og at der derfor ikke er andre muligheder for s vidt angr oksekżd fra hundyr. 
It is however also important to underline that intervention is limited to beef originating from male animals and, therefore, for beef originating from female animals there is no optional approach possible.
Frem til juni 2001 blev der reelt opkżbt 769 632 han-og hundyr til destruktionsordningen (opgjort pr. 30.6.2001). 
The number of male and female animals that effectively entered the purchase-for-destruction scheme ending in June 2001 is 769 632 (situation as at 30 June 2001).
Man bżr huske, at pržmierne har til forml at yde landbrugerne kompensation for prisnedsžttelser, som fastlžgges som led i markedsstżtteord-ningerne. 
It is worthwhile to remember that premiums aim to compensate farmers partially for price reductions decided in the context of the market support mechanisms.
Kriterierne i pržmieordningerne omfatter ikke incitamenter til at żge produktionen. 
The criteria of the premium schemes do not contain incentives for increasing production.
Rettens overvejelser om omlžgning af stżtte og tilskyndelse til ekstensivering er i hżjeste grad i overensstemmelse med Kommissionens beslutningsforslag, som landbrugsministerrdet vedtog den 20. juni 2001. 
In addition, the reflections of the Court on reorienting subsidies and encouraging extensification constitute the major part of the decision proposed by the Commission and adopted by the Agriculture Council of 20 June 2001.
Alle EU-forarbejdningsanlžg er nu udstyret, s de kan overholde de fastlagte forarbejdningsstandarder (133 ĄC, 3 bar, 20 minutter). 
All EU rendering plants are now equipped to operate appropriate processing standards (133 Ą, 3 bars, 20 minutes).
Den Videnskabelige Styringskomit har ikke i forbindelse med BSE ppeget en generel fare ved at bruge animalsk protein i foder: under forudsžtning af at visse betingelser overholdes, har Den Videnskabelige Styringskomit ikke frardet brugen af dyre-protein i foder til ikke-drżvtyggere. 
The Scientific Steering Committee has not pointed at a general danger in using animal-based protein in animal feed in the context of BSE: provided certain conditions are fulfilled, the Scientific Steering Committee has not advised against using animal protein in feed for non-ruminant species.
Ligeledes menes visse animalske proteiner, f.eks. fiskemel eller mžlkebaseret protein, heller ikke at udgżre en BSE-risiko for husdyr af nogen art, herunder drżvtyggere. 
Likewise, certain animal-based proteins, such as fish meal or milk-based protein, are not considered to present a BSE risk in feed for any species, including ruminants.
Det gžldende forbud mod at fodre husdyr med dyre-protein blev vedtaget som et sygdomsbekžmpende tiltag, da man ikke havde en test, der kunne skelne mellem protein fra forskellige arter, og da forordningsudkastet om animalske biprodukter endnu ikke var blevet vedtaget og gennemfżrt. 
The current total ban on feeding animal protein to farm animals was adopted as a control measure in the absence of a test capable of differentiating between protein of different species and pending the adoption and enforcement of the draft regulation on animal by-producs.
Efter den internationale videnskabelige konference om kżd-og benmel besluttede Kommissionen sig for at anmode om en videnskabelig udtalelse om sikkerheden ved kżd-og benmelsprodukter. 
After the International Scientific Conference on MBM, the Commission decided to seek a scientific opinion on the safety of MBM.
Denne udtalelse blev afgivet i juni 1999 og revideret i juli 1999. 
This opinion was delivered in June 1999 and re-edited in July 1999.
Anbefalingerne i udtalelsen er medtaget i den foreslede forordning om animalske biprodukter og Kommissionens beslutning 2001/25/EF. 
The recommendations of that opinion have been included in the proposed regulation on animal by-products and Commission Decision 2001/25/EC.
Det omtales, at direktivet om identifikation og registrering af dyr fra 1992 er blevet erstattet af en ny rdsforordning, men dette gžlder kun for s vidt angr reglerne om kvžg. 
It should be noted that the mentioned replacement of the existing 1992 Directive on animal identification and registration with a new Council regulation only concerns the provisions for bovine animals.
Kommissionen er desuden ved at behandle et forordningsforslag med henblik p at styrke de eksisterende bestemmelser om identifikation og registrering af fr. 
Furthermore, the Commission is considering a proposal for a regulation with the aim of reinforcement of the existing provisions for identification and registration of sheep.
Rdets regler tillader ikke ČsammenkždningÇ, som man f.eks. kan gżre med hormonlovgivningen. 
Council legislation does not allow Ôcross complianceŐ as is the case for hormone legislation, for example.
ANBEFALINGER 55. a) Efter Kommissionens opfattelse bżr disse forslag overvejes (se oversigten). 
RECOMMENDATIONS 55. (a) The Commission considers that these proposals merit consideration (see general overview).
Spżrgsmlet om, hvorvidt Kommissionen bżr have yderligere befżjelse til at tržffe hastetiltag i sdanne situationer, er et żmfindtligt punkt, eftersom medlemsstaterne er betžnkelige ved at afgive sdanne befżjelser, uden at et forskriftsudvalg fungerer som sikkerhedsnet. 
The question of whether the Commission should have specific additional emergency powers is a very delicate issue as Member States are reluctant to cede such powers without the safeguard of clearance though a regulatory committee.
I mellemtiden er der fra politisk side forżget opmžrksomhed om, at man ikke bżr Čskyde genvejÇ, nr det gžlder beskyttelse af den offentlige sundhed. Kommissionen overvejer aktivt, hvad man ellers kan gżre for at styrke overholdelsen, og sžtter i denne forbindelse stor pris p Rettens beretning. b) Rettens forslag om mulighederne for at tilbageholde finansiel stżtte vil medlemsstaterne nok finde noget kontroversielt. 
In the interim, there is a heightened political awareness of the need to take no short cuts in relation to public health protection. The Commission is actively reflecting on what more could be done to improve compliance and the CourtŐs report is very welcome in this respect. (b) The link made by the Court to the possibility of withholding financial support is likely to be controversial with the Member States.
Det m vžre den sidste udvej i tilfžlde af vedvarende mangelfuld gennemfżrelse af EU-lovgivning eller manglende gennemfżrelse af videnskabeligt underbyggede sikringstiltag jf. beretningen. 
Such action would only be a last resort in the context of persistent poor application of Community legislation or failure to implement scientifically justified safeguard measures as envisaged in the report.
20.11.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 324/35 d) og e) Rettens overvejelser om omlžgning af stżtte og tilskyndelse til ekstensivering er i hżjeste grad i overensstemmelse med Kommissionens beslutningsforslag, som landbrugsministerrdet vedtog den 20. juni 2001. 
20.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 324/35 (d) and (e) The reflections of the Court on reorienting subsidies and encouraging extensification constitute the major part of the Decision proposed by the Commission and adopted by the Agriculture Council of 20 June 2001.
4, andet afsnit, EF) (2002/C 121/01) INDHOLD RESUM ................................................................... Oversigtoverprogrammerne ................................................ 
23.5.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 121/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 1/2002 concerningmacrofinancialassistance(MFA)tothirdcountriesandstructuraladjustmentfacilities (SAF)intheMediterraneancountries,togetherwiththeCommissionŐsreplies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) (2002/C 121/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................. Programmeoverview....................................................... Frameworkandlegalbasis...................................................
Rammebetingelserogretsgrundlag ............................................ 
THECOURTŐSAUDIT.........................................................
Udformningafdenmakrofinansiellebistand .................................... 
Background ...........................................................
Konklusioneroganbefalinger ................................................ 
Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FINANSIELOGBUDGETMŽSSIGBETYDNING .................................... 
RationaleofFinancingAgreements .........................................
PROGRAMMERNESUDFORMNING ............................................. 
Conditionality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Politiskeforhndsbetingelser .............................................. Komplementaritet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Principle of exceptional character . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Politicalpreconditions ...................................................
Punkt I-VIII I II III IV V VI VII VIII 1-7 8-10 8 9-10 11-14 15-46 15-27 15-16 17-19 20-21 22-27 28-46 28-29 30-33 34-35 36-41 Side 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 9 9 9 
Paragraph Page I-VIII 3 I 3 II 3 III 3 IV 3 V 4 VI 4 VII 4 VIII 4 1-7 5 8-10 6 8 6 9-10 6 11-14 6 15-46 6 15-27 6 15-16 6 17-19 7 20-21 7 22-27 7 28-46 8 28-29 8 30-33 9 34-35 9 36-41 9
C 121/2 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 23.5.2002 Punkt Side Konditionalitet ......................................................... 
C 121/2 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23.5.2002 Paragraph Page Conditionality..........................................................
42-45 10 Finansieldisciplin....................................................... 
46 11 ASSESSMENT OF PARTNER GOVERNMENTŐS BUDGETARY AND ACCOUNTING PROCESSES.................................................................
51-60 11 Generellebemžrkninger .................................................... 
51-60 11 Generalobservations .......................................................
69-70 14 Udformning,betingelserogkontrolafaftaler .................................... 
61-65 12 SAFintheMediterraneancountries............................................
71-74 14 Vurdering af partnerregeringernes budgetforvaltning og regnskabsfżrelse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
61-62 12 MFAtothirdcountries .....................................................
75-76 14 Evalueringer . . . . . ......................................................... 
69-70 14 Design,conditionsandmonitoringofagreements ................................
77-78 15 BILAG ............ ......................................................... ........... 
75-76 14 Evaluations .............................................................. 77-78 15 ANNEXES .................................................................. ...........
16 Kommissionenssvar ........................................................ ........... 
16 TheCommissionŐsreplies .................................................... ...........
20 AVS BWI GD GD ECFIN GD RELEX Żkofin-Rdet EU EUF FYROM BNI IMF MFA EFT SAF moms FORKORTELSER Stater i Afrika, Vestindien og Stillehavet Bretton Woods-institutionerne (Den Internationale Valutafond og Verdensbanken) Generaldirektorat Generaldirektoratet for Żkonomiske og Finansielle Anliggender Generaldirektoratet for Eksterne Forbindelser Rdet (żkonomi og finans) Den Europžiske Union De Europžiske Udviklingsfonde Den tidligere jugoslaviske republik Makedonien Bruttonationalindkomst Den Internationale Valutafond Makrofinansiel bistand De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende Strukturtilpasningsfacilitet Mervžrdiafgift 
20 ACP BWI DG DG ECFIN DG RELEX Ecofin Council EU EDF FYROM GNP IMF MFA OJ SAF VAT ABBREVIATIONS African, Caribbean and Pacific States the Bretton Woods Institutions (the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank) Directorate-General Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Directorate-General for External Relations Council Economic and Financial Affairs European Union European Development Funds former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia gross national product International Monetary Fund macrofinancial assistance Official Journal of the European Communities structural adjustment facility value added taxation
23.5.2002 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende RESUM Oversigt over programmerne I. Den Europžiske Unions bistand til tredjelande ydes ikke blot i form af stżtte til specifikke programmer og projekter, men Unionen stżtter ogs den generelle żkonomiske omstillings-og strukturreformproces ved at yde makrożkonomisk bistand. 
23.5.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities SUMMARY Programme overview I. The European Union helps third countries not only through specific programme and project assistance but also by supporting general economic transition and structural reform processes with assistance at a macroeconomic level.
Denne form for stżtte kaldes ČMakrofinansiel bistandÇ (MFA) til tredjelande ssom EU-tiltrždelseslande, Det Vestlige Balkan og De Nye Uafhžngige Stater (1) og ČStrukturtilpasningsfacilitetÇ (SAF) (2) for tredjelande i Middelhavsomrdet (Meda). 
Such assistance is called Ômacrofinancial assistanceŐ (MFA) for third countries such as the EU accession countries, the western Balkans and the new independent States (1) and Ôstructural adjustment facilitiesŐ (SAF) (2) for the Mediterranean (MEDA) non-member countries.
Rammebetingelser og retsgrundlag II. 
Framework and legal basis II.
Der er ikke nogen rammeforordning p omrdet, og MFA-interventionerne er derfor baseret p sžrskilte rdsafgżrelser. 
In the absence of a framework regulation, the MFA interventions are based on individual Council decisions.
MFA ydes hovedsagelig i form af ln. 
MFA is mainly given as loans.
MFA anses for at vžre et ekstraordinžrt instrument og forvaltes af GD ECFIN. 
It is considered to be an exceptional instrument and is managed by DG ECFIN.
Meda-forordningen fra 1996 udgżr retsgrundlaget for SAF-aktionerne. 
The legal basis for SAF actions is the 1996 MEDA Regulation.
Faciliteten anses ikke for at vžre et ekstraordinžrt instrument og blev forvaltet af GD RELEX indtil 2001, hvor EuropeAid overtog forvaltningen af den (jf. punkt 1-5). 
SAF are given as grants, are not considered to be an exceptional instrument and were managed by DG RELEX, until 2001, when EuropeAid took over the management of SAF (see paragraphs 1 to 5).
Udformning af strukturtilpasningsfaciliteten III. 
Design of structural adjustment facilities III.
Kommissionen redegżr ikke for, p hvilket grundlag beslutningerne vedrżrende det samlede belżb til det enkelte SAF-program er truffet, og der er heller ingen dokumentation for forfaldsplanen eller for, hvordan belżbet er fordelt p de enkelte rater. 
In relation to SAF, the Commission does not document the basis for decisions on the global amount of the programme nor the timing and amount of instalments.
Grundlaget for disse beslutninger er derfor uklart. 
Therefore, the rationale for these decisions is not clear.
Stżttebelżbet er som hovedregel ikke baseret p de faktiske udgifter i forbindelse med det dertil relaterede reformprogram (jf. punkt 20). 
In general, the amount of the support is not based on the specific cost of the associated reform programme (see paragraph 20).
I betingelserne for programmerne har der isžr vžret lagt vžgt p fremlžggelse af lovforslag, handlingsplaner mv., alts om hensigter snarere end resultater. 
The programmesŐ conditions have focused on the presentation of legislation, action plans etc, which represent intentions rather than being based on results.
Generelt fremgr det ikke klart af finansieringsaftalerne, hvilke betingelser der er de samme som dem, Bretton Woods-Institutionerne (BWI) (3) stiller, og hvilke betingelser der udelukkende er Kommissionens. 
Generally, the Financing Agreements do not clearly indicate which conditions are shared with the Bretton Woods Institutions (BWI) (3), and which are the CommissionŐs alone.
Mange af de specifikke betingelser vedrżrer den sociale sektor. 
Many of the specific conditions relate to the social sector.
Men strukturtilpasningsspecialister har mske ikke altid et samlet overblik over de sociale sektorer, og man konsulterer ikke systematisk tekniske eksperter (jf. punkt 23-27). 
However, structural adjustment specialists may lack a comprehensive view of social sectors and technical experts are not systematically consulted (see paragraphs 23 to 27).
Udformning af den makrofinansielle bistand IV. 
Design of macrofinancial assistance IV.
EUŐs MFA overholder ikke altid de fem principper (4), som Żkofin-Rdet vedtog i 1995, og som skulle gžlde for MFA-politikken over for tredjelande. 
EU MFA does not always respect the five principles (4) that the Ecofin Council agreed in 1995, which should govern the policy of MFA to third countries.
F.eks. er bistanden i nogle tilfžlde ordinžr og kontinuerlig og ikke ekstraordinžr. 
For example, the assistance is in some cases regular and continuous rather than exceptional.
De politiske forhndsbetingelser (5) er ikke altid opfyldt. 
The political preconditions (5) are not always fulfilled.
C 121/3 (1) Disse regioner modtager MFA. 
So far, MFA has C 121/3 (1) These regions are receiving MFA.
Tidligere var ogs Israel (1991) og Algeriet (1991 og 1994) modtagerlande. 
In the past, Israel (1991) and Algeria (1991 and 1994) were also beneficiary countries.
(2) EU yder ogs strukturtilpasningsbistand til lande i Afrika, Vestindien og Stillehavet (AVS-landene) (jf. punkt 7). 
(2) The EU also provides structural adjustment assistance to the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP) (see para-3 graph 7).
(3) Den Internationale Valutafond (IMF) og Verdensbanken. 
(4) The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.
(4) Ekstraordinžr karakter, politiske forhndsbetingelser, komplementaritet, konditionalitet og finansiel disciplin. 
(5) Exceptional character, political preconditions, complementarity, conditionality and financial discipline. () Geographical proximity to EU, full respect of human rights and rule of law.
C 121/4 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 23.5.2002 Princippet om, at der skal opstilles betingelser i tilknytning til politiske og żkonomiske reformer, overholdes altid, men mange af disse betingelser indeholder ikke klare og mlelige resultatkriterier, og det kan ikke uden videre efterprżves, om de er overholdt. 
The examination of complementarity between EU MFA and other EU assistance revealed problems of coordination within the Commission (see paragraphs 36 to 41). Although the principle of including conditions relating to political and economic reforms is always respected, many of these do not define clear and measurable performance criteria, and are not easily verifiable.
Endvidere er princippet om makrożkonomisk konditionalitet blevet udvandet, nr der i forbindelse med en beslutning om at foretage betalinger er blevet taget hensyn til hastesi-tuationer og sžrlige politiske bindinger (jf. punkt 42-45). 
Furthermore the principle of macroeconomic conditionality has been watered down when urgent and political constraints have been taken into account for a payment decision (see paragraphs 42 to 45).