natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det blev derfor fastsat, at de medlemsstater, der endnu ikke var i stand til at udveksle visse typer af oplysninger (f.eks. fordi en bestemt database endnu ikke var etab-leret), ville ptage sig forpligtelsen til at udveksle sdanne oplysninger, s snart det var muligt (jf. artikel 5, stk. 2, i forordning (EF) nr. 1925/2004 om de efterfżlgende žndringer af de (under)kategorier af oplysninger, som medlemsstaterne udveksler, og om den efterfżlgende žndring af den mde, hvorp oplysningerne udveksles). 
Accordingly, it was foreseen that those Member States which were not yet in a position to exchange certain types of information (e.g. because a specific database was still to be developed), would take up the obligation to exchange that information as soon as it was possible (see Article 5, paragraph 2, of Regulation (EC) No 1925/2004, about the subsequent modifications of (sub)categories of information which Member States exchange, and about the subsequent modification of the way in which the information is exchanged).
Formlet, som det udtrykkes i artikel 17 i forordning (EF) nr. 
The aim, expressed in Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 and Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1925/2004, was to come to an exchange of information as complete as possible.
C 20/22 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 25.1.2008 53. 
C 20/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 25.1.2008 53.
Udvekslingen af oplysninger uden forudgende anmodning bżr forbedres. 
The functioning of the exchange of information without prior request should be improved.
Der bżr overvejes mere effektive metoder til udveksling af oplysninger, hvor der tages hżjde for den seneste teknologiske udvikling og til det udstyr, der anvendes af de erhvervsdrivende. 
More efficient methods of exchanging information, taking account of recent technological developments and the equipment used by traders, should be envisaged.
Det bżr ogs overvejes at sikre hyppigere og mere detaljerede automatiserede overfżrsler af oplysninger mellem medlemsstaterne, eller endog direkte adgang til nationale databaser (1). 
More frequent and more detailed automated exchanges between Member States, or even direct access to national databases, should also be considered (1).
Drżftelser om, hvorledes anvendelsen af denne metode kan forbedres, foregr lżbende i strategigruppen vedrżrende bekžmpelse af skattesvig. 
The discussions on possible ways to improve the use of this tool are currently ongoing within the Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group.
Diskussionen om anvendelse af Eurocanet er et typisk eksempel p medlemsstaternes anvendelse af denne metode. 
The discussion on the use of Eurocanet is a typical example of the use Member States make of this tool.
Desuden viser resultaterne af det arbejde, der er udfżrt af en ržkke Fiscalis-projektgrupper (FPGŐer) og de lżbende drżftelser med disse grupper, at medlemsstaterne żnsker at forbedre anvendelsen af denne metode og at anvende denne form for udveksling af oplysninger p en mere struktureret mde, f.eks. i forbindelse med brugte biler og import. 
Furthermore, conclusions of the work carried out by several Fiscalis Project Groups (FPGs) and ongoing discussions within these groups reflect Member StatesŐ desires to improve the use of this tool and to set up a more structured use of this type of exchange of information, e.g. with regard to second hand cars and importations.
Hvad angr statistikker har medlemsstaterne godkendt en ržkke detaljerede retningslinjer og instrukser, som skal sikre, at der meddeles mere pržcise statistikker om de kategorier af oplysninger, der udveksles uden forudgende anmodning. 
As far as statistics are concerned, the Member States have agreed with detailed guidelines and instructions, providing for the communication of more precise statistics on the categories of information that are exchanged without prior request.
Disse nye retningslinjer bżr anvendes fra 2007 (for s vidt angr meddelelse af statistiske oplysninger vedrżrende anmodninger og svar, der er fremsendt og modtaget i 2006). 
These new guidelines should be applied as from 2007 (for the communication of statistical data concerning the requests and replies that are sent and received in 2006).
Eurocanet-projektet (European Carousel network), hvori 22 af de 27 medlemsstater deltager, fremmer en operationel strategi, der gżr det muligt at involvere de nationale enheder for bekžmpelse af svig. 
The Eurocanet (European Carousel network) project, in which 22 of 27 Member States participate, has promoted an operational approach enabling the national anti-fraud units to be involved.
Dataforvaltning og Đanalyse phviler udelukkende medlemsstaterne. 
The data management and the analysis remain with the Member States only.
Kommissionen har i żjeblikket ikke nogen adgang til oplysningerne og kan derfor ikke foretage nogen analyse. 
The Commission has currently no access to the data and therefore cannot provide any analysis.
Fżlgelig kan Kommissionen kun tilbyde finansiel og administrativ stżtte for at fremme udvekslingen af data mellem medlemsstaterne. 
As a consequence, the Commission is only able to offer financial and administrative support to enhance the exchange of data between Member States.
Kommissionen vil imidlertid vžre villig til at tilbyde mere konkret stżtte, som f.eks. analyse af tendenser og kommende initiativer p EU-plan, hvis medlemmerne mtte żnske det. 
However, the Commission would be willing to offer more concrete support, such as e.g. analysis on trends and up-coming schemes at Community level if Member States would ask for it.
Oplysninger om leverancer af varer inden for Fžllesskabet bżr formidles hurtigt til andre medlemsstater. 
Information concerning intra-Community supplies of goods should be communicated rapidly to other Member States.
De oplysninger, der i żjeblikket udveksles mellem medlemsstaterne, skal overholde den tre mneders periode, der er fastsat i artikel 25 i forordning (EF) nr. 1798/2003. 
The data currently exchanged between the Member States have to respect the three months period set in Article 25 of Regulation 1798/2003.
Som fżlge heraf er en hurtigere udveksling af oplysninger om leverancer af varer inden for Fžllesskabet et af de vigtigste spżrgsml i forbindelse med de drżftelser med medlemsstaterne, som blev igangsat med Kommissionens meddelelse fra maj 2006. 
Accordingly, the issue of a quicker exchange of data on intra-Community supplies is one of the major elements in the discussions with Member States which have been launched by the CommissionŐs Communication of May 2006.
Spżrgsmlet blev senere drżftet i strategigruppen vedrżrende bekžmpelse af skattesvig. 
The issue was afterwards discussed in the Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group.
(1) KOM(2006) 254 af 31.5.2006, punkt 5.2. 
(1) COM(2006) 254 of 31.5.2006, point 5.2.
Som et resultat af disse drżftelser opfordrede Żkofin-Rdet i juni 2007 Kommissionen til at fremsžtte lovgivningsforslag med henblik p at nedsžtte tidsfristerne for at fremsende oversigter og for udveksling af disse oplysninger mellem medlemsstaterne. 
As a result of these discussions, the ECOFIN Council of June 2007 invited the Commisison to come forward with legislative proposals with a view of reducing the timeframes for submitting the recapitualtive statement as well as for exchanging this information between the Member States.
Rdet mente, at disse forslag mtte ledsages af en konsekvensanalyse. 
The Council indicated these proposals need to be accompanied by an impact assessment.
Kommissionen er i żjeblikket i fžrd med at foretage denne analyse for at vurdere, hvilken indvirkning p virksomhedernes omkostninger en sdan žndring vil f. 
The Commission is currently carrying out this assessment, in order to evaluate the impact in terms of costs for businesses of such a change.
Der er i żjeblikket drżftelser i gang med medlemsstaterne om automatiseret adgang for de kompetente myndigheder til oplysninger i andre medlemsstaters databaser (en af aktiviteterne i strategigruppen vedrżrende bekžmpelse af skattesvig). 
Discussions are currently ongoing with the Member States on automated access for competent authorities to data contained in the databases of other Member States (part of the activities of the Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group).
Adgang til nationale databaser blev allerede omtalt i Kommissionens meddelelse fra maj 2006 som et af de elementer, der kan forbedre informationsudvekslingen (1). 
The access to national databases was already suggested in the CommissionŐs Communication of May 2006, as one of the elements to improve the exchange of information (1).
Fordelen ved en multilateral strategi fremgr af eksemplet med Eurocanet-projektet, som Retten omtaler i punkt 54, og som giver medlemsstaternes tjenester for skattekontrol et bedre indblik i eller endog et fuldstžndigt billede af en mulig bedragerikžde. 
The advantage of a multilateral approach is shown by the example of the Eurocanet project, mentioned by the Court in paragraph 54, which offers Member States tax investigation services a better insight or even the full picture of a suspected fraud chain.
Alle deltagende medlemsstater har adgang til alle oplysninger uden begržnsninger. 
All Member States participating have access to all data exchanged without limitation.
Spżrgsmlet om, hvorvidt rapportering af oversigter over erhvervelser inden for Fžllesskabet skal vžre obligatorisk, er blevet drżftet p Fiscalis-seminarer og i FiscalisĐprojektgrupper. 
The issue of imposing reporting obligations for recapitulative statements on intra-Community acquisitions has been discussed in several Fiscalis seminars and project groups.
P grund af problemerne med oplysningernes kvalitet og de hyppige fejlagtige rapporteringer fra de erhvervsdrivende selv, er fordelene ved en sdan forpligtelse ikke blevet pvist. 
In view of the problems of quality of data and frequent misreporting by traders themselves, the benefits of such an obligation are not demonstrated.
Desuden ville en forpligtelse til rapportering af erhvervelser inden for Fžllesskabet medfżre en betydelig yderligere administrativ byrde for de erhvervsdrivende. 
In addition, imposing a reporting of intra-Community acquisitions would constitute a serious additional administrative burden for traders.
Siden 2002 har Kommissionen stillet et valideringsvžrk-tżj for momsregistreringsnumre til rdighed p sit netsted, (ČVIES VAT number validationÇ). 
Since 2002, the Commission has made a VIES VAT number validation tool available on its website.
Siden 2005 har der vžret adgang til et interface, som gżr det muligt for datasystemer automatisk at kontrollere momsregistreringsnumres gyldighed. 
An open interface is available since 2005, allowing the automatic verification of VAT numbers by computer systems.
Den mulighed, som 11 medlemsstater giver for at krydstjekke momsregistreringsnumre med navne p skattepligtige personer, er et nyttigt vžrktżj til at forebygge misbrug af momsregistreringsnumre. 
The option given by 11 Member States to cross-check VAT ID numbers with names of taxable persons is a useful tool to prevent the abuse of VAT ID numbers.
P mżdet i det stende udvalg vedrżrende informationsteknologi (SCIT) i juni 2007 blev der opnet enighed om at pržcisere, hvorledes startdato og ophżrsdato for skattepligtige personers żkonomiske aktiviteter skal vžre defineret i VIES. 
At the Standing Committee on Information Technology (SCIT) meeting of June 2007, an agreement was reached to clarify the understanding of the start date and cessation date of taxable personsŐ economic activities in VIES.
69-70. 
69-70.
Kommissionen arbejder p en modernisering af VIES-systemet. 
The Commission is working on a modernisation of the VIES system.
Dette giver mulighed for at gennemfżre forbedringer, nr det gžlder det administrative samarbejde med henblik p bekžmpelse af momssvig. 
This presents an opportunity for implementing improvements with regard to the administrative cooperation to fight VAT fraud.
25.1.2008 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 20/23 I gennemfżrlighedsundersżgelsen af VIES II, som blev forelagt p SCAC-mżdet i marts 2004, blev der foreslet en tidsplan for denne modernisering. 
25.1.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 20/23 The VIES 2 Feasability study, announced at the SCAC meeting of March 2004, proposed a planning for this modernisation.
Tidsplanen blev dog ikke godkendt af medlemsstaterne. 
This planning was however not approved by the Member States.
Et sžrligt problem var det manglende retsgrundlag. 
A particular problem was raised by the lack of legal base.
Dette blev klart i forbindelse med arbejdet vedrżrende indarbejdelse af tjenesteydelser i VIES (B2B). 
This was made clear in the work undertaken to include services in VIES (B2B).
Disse aktiviteter blev indledt ud fra den antagelse, at retsgrundlaget ville vžre vedtaget inden 1. januar 2007. 
These activities started under the assumption that the legal base would be approved by 1.1.2007.
Det manglende retsgrundlag, som stadig ikke er godkendt, har fżrt til, at kun halvdelen af medlemsstaterne har gennemfżrt det. 
Lack of this legal base, which has still not been approved, led to only half of the Member States having implemented it.
P grund af det meget begržnsede operationelle udbytte, mange medlemsstater har fet af deres investering, er de meget tilbageholdende med at gentage denne strategi. 
As so far very limited operational progress has resulted from their investment, many Member States are very reluctant to consider repeating this approach.
Retsgrundlaget for One Stop Shop er, siden gennemfżrlighedsundersżgelsen blev drżftet, blevet žndret, hvilket har medfżrt tre nye underprojekter, som stadig er under behandling i Rdet. 
As for One Stop Shop, since the Feasibility Study was discussed, this legal base has changed and has led to three new subprojects, which are still being discussed in the Council.
Det var sledes fżrst p SCIT-mżdet i juni 2007, at det blev besluttet, at aftalen var tilstržkkelig stabil til, at man kunne begynde at arbejde p ordningen. 
Thus, only at the SCIT meeting of June 2007, it was considered that the agreement was stable enough in order to start working on it.
Med hensyn til e-Forms arbejdes der kun med de (tre) formularer, som blev betragtet som tilstržkkelig stabile. 
As for e-Forms, work is progressing only on the forms which were considered stable enough (three).
Hvad angr de żvrige formularer, er det nżdvendigt med drżftelser i bde SCAC og i arbejdsgrupper om formularernes indhold og om, hvorvidt det er hensigtsmžssigt at bruge ressourcer p at konvertere dem til XML-format. 
For the other forms, discussions are needed both in SCAC and in working groups, on the contents of the forms themselves, as well as the usefulness of the work needed to translate them into the XML format.
Hvad angr dataenes kvalitet er arbejdet i gang med at begržnse tidsrammer og forbedre behandlingen af historiske momsregistre-ringsdata. 
As for quality of data, work has started on the reduction of time-frames and the improvement of treatment of historical VAT registration records.
Imidlertid kržver bde begržnsningen af tidsrammerne og andre datakvalitetsprojekter, at der afholdes drżftelser i SCAC, inden arbejdet kan pbegyndes. 
However, both reduction of timeframes and other quality of data projects need discussion in SCAC before work can start.
Med hensyn til spżrgsmlet om forsinkelser i forbindelse med indsamling og indlžsning af data er der indledt drżftelser med medlemsstaterne med henblik p at nedsžtte fristen for fremsendelse af momsoversigterne til n mned og at nedsžtte fristen for fremsendelse af data til andre medlemsstater til ogs n mned. 
With regard to the issue of delays in collecting and capturing the data, discussions with Member States are ongoing, in order to speed up the periods for submitting the VAT recapitulative statements to 1 month and to speed up the transmission of the data to other Member States to also 1 month.
71-72. 
71-72.
Muligheden for at skatteembedsmžnd kan vžre til stede i andre medlemsstater, er et fleksibelt instrument til administrativt samarbejde. 
The possibility to have a presence of tax officials in other Member States is a flexible instrument for administrative cooperation.
Medlemsstaterne er ved flere lejligheder (Fiscalis-seminarer, mżder i strategigruppen vedrżrende bekžmpelse af skattesvig) blevet opfordret til at gżre mere brug af dette instrument. 
On several occasions (Fiscalis seminars, meetings of the Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group), Member States have been encouraged to make more use of it.
Kommissionen stżtter den nu stigende anvendelse af dette vžrktżj gennem etablering af platformen for multilateral kontrol (MLC), som er et permanent forum for fremme og evaluering af MLC, og gennem udveksling af god praksis vedrżrende MLC. 
The Commission supports the current increased use of this tool through the setting up of the multilateral controls (MLC) platform, a permanent forum for promoting and evaluating MLCs and assuring the exchange of best practices relating to MLCs.
De tekniske muligheder for samarbejde om MLC er ogs blevet forbedret. 
The technical possibilities to cooperate in MLCs are also improved.
Siden slutningen af 2006 har medlemsstaterne med den nye version af Common Communication Network (CCN) haft mulighed for at fremsende sikre e-mails (f.eks. CLO-anmodninger) til deres lokale kontorer. 
Since end 2006, the new version of the Common Communication Network (CCN) allows the Member States to forward mails (e.g. CLO requests) securely to their local offices.
Ved slutningen af 2007 vil direkte elektronisk kontrakt mellem deltagerne i en MLC vžre mulig gennem en sikker kanal. 
By end 2007, direct electronic contact between the participants in a MLC through a secured channel will be possible.
I 2006 blev der foretaget 16 nye multilaterale kontroller, og der blev afholdt i alt 58 multilaterale kontrolmżder og 5 multilaterale kontroludvžlgelsesmżder. 
In 2006, 16 new multilateral controls were launched and in total there were 58 multilateral control meetings and 5 multilateral control selection meetings organised.
Siden Fiscalis-seminaret i juni 2006 har flere medlemsstater ivžrksat multilaterale kontroller. 
Since the Fiscalis seminar in June 2006, more Member States have initialised multilateral controls.
I betragtning af vanskelighederne med at opn enighed inden for SCAC (hvis aktiviteter mest er af teknisk art) bliver en ržkke spżrgsml nu drżftet inden for den politisk orienterede strategigruppe vedrżrende bekžmpelse af skattesvig, p grundlag af de konklusioner, der blev vedtaget af Rdet (Żkofin-mżderne i november 2006 og juni 2007). 
Taking into account the difficulty to obtain an agreement within the SCAC (whose activities are more of a technical nature), certain issues are now discussed within the policy oriented Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group, based on the conclusions adopted by the Council (ECOFIN Council meetings of November 2006 and June 2007).
Den skaldte ČTrend formÇ blev vedtaget for at lette meddelelsen af oplysninger vedrżrende nye tendenser i forbindelse med svig. 
A ÔTrend formŐ was adopted to facilitate the communication of information with regard to new fraud trends.
P nžsten alle SCAC-mżder benytter Kommissionen lejligheden til at tilskynde medlemsstaterne til at udveksle oplysninger med anvendelse af denne formular. 
In almost all SCAC meetings, the Commission takes the opportunity to encourage Member States to share information, using this form.
Som Retten bemžrker, er disse formularer ikke blevet benyttet fżr nu. 
As noted by the Court, these trend forms have not been used until now.
Ikke desto mindre fżlger Eurocanet-projektet denne id op, da dets forml ogs er at udveksle erfaringer og god praksis. 
Nevertheless, the Eurocanet project follows this idea as its purpose also is to share experiences and best practices.
Der har endnu ikke vžret en udveksling af informationer om nye udviklinger og tendenser mellem medlemsstaterne, men de anvender Eurocanet-gruppen til drżftelser af nye tendenser og nye svigordninger. 
An exchange of information on new trends and tendencies has not yet taken place between the Member States, they however use the Eurocanet Group for discussions on new trends and new up-coming fraudulent schemes.
Overvgningssystemet er et af de emner, som den nuvžrende strategigruppe vedrżrende bekžmpelse af skattesvig drżfter med medlemsstaterne. 
The monitoring system is one of the discussion topics of the present Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group with the Member States.
I sin meddelelse fra maj 2006 (1) foretog Kommissionen en evaluering af den nuvžrende lovgivningsmžssige ramme og af, hvordan det administrative samarbejde fungerer (herunder samarbejdet p momsomrdet). 
The Commission in its Communication of May 2006 (1) made an assessment of the existing legal framework and the practice concerning administrative cooperation (including the cooperation in the field of VAT).
Meddelelsen omfattede en ržkke forslag til forbedring af samarbejdet. 
It indicated ways to explore how to improve this cooperation.
Efterfżlgende har Rdet drżftet det administrative samarbejde som et redskab til bekžmpelse af svig (Rdets mżder (Żkofin) i november 2006 og juni 2007) og opfordret Kommissionen til at arbejde videre, specielt p momsomrdet. 
Since then, the Council has discussed the functioning of the administrative cooperation as a tool to fight fraud (ECOFIN Council meetings of November 2006 and June 2007), and invited the Commission to carry out further work, in particular in the field of VAT.
Kommissionen har nu sat mange ressourcer ind p opfżlgningen af disse drżftelser. 
The Commission has now put many resources into the follow-up of these discussions.
Stra-tegigruppen vedrżrende bekžmpelse af skattesvig er blevet oprettet, og gruppen har allerede haft seks mżder. 
The Anti Tax Fraud Strategy-Group was created and this group has already had 6 meetings.
(1) KOM(2006) 254 af 31.5.2006. 
(1) COM(2006) 254 of 31.5.2006.
C 20/24 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 25.1.2008 I mellemtiden har medlemsstaterne kunnet opn mere erfaring med organisationsstrukturen for det administrative samarbejde og med eventuelle samarbejdsproblemer i forbindelse med de kompetente myndigheders administrative struktur i medlemsstaterne. 
C 20/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 25.1.2008 In the meantime, the Member States have been able to gain more experience with the organisational set-up for the administrative cooperation, and with possible cooperation problems that may be linked to the administrative organisation of the competent authorities within the Member States.
Dette specifikke emne vil indg i den kommende evaluering, der vil blive offentliggjort i 2008. 
This specific issue will be part of the forthcoming evaluation, to be published in 2008.
Den administrative struktur i medlemsstaterne henhżrer under disses kompetence, og det er vanskeligt at give generelle retningslinjer, eftersom den ideelle struktur afhžnger af faktorer, der kan variere fra medlemsstat til medlemsstat (territoriets stżrrelse, antallet af skattepligtige personer, myndighedernes generelle struktur m.v.). 
The administrative organisation within the Member States falls under their competence, and it is difficult to provide general guidelines, as the ideal organisation depends on factors that can differ from Member State to Member State (size of the territory, number of taxable persons, general structure of the authorities, etc.).
Kommissionen (OLAF) har gentagne gange anmodet om adgang til de udvekslede oplysninger, men uden succes. 
Access to the content of the information exhanged has been requested several times by the Commission (OLAF) without success.
Hvis Kommissionen (OLAF) havde adgang til de udvekslede oplysninger, ville den kunne forbedre sin funktion som serviceplatform for medlemsstaternes tjenester. 
If the Commission (OLAF) had access to the information exchanged it could improve its role as a service platform for Member StatesŐ services.