natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I forbindelse med flerrige programmer kan visse resultater, f.eks. bruttovžrditilvžkst og virkninger, fżrst vurderes korrekt godt inde i programmeringsperioden og efterfżlgende. 
However, for multiannual programmes certain results, such as gross value added, and impacts can only be properly assessed well into the programming period and afterwards.
For de fleste interventioners vedkommende var dette endnu ikke tilfžldet p tidspunktet for gennemfżrelsen af midtvejsevalueringen. 
For most interventions, this was not yet the case at the moment of the mid-term evaluation.
Visse af programmernes resultater og virkninger kunne derfor endnu ikke mles i modsžtning til udgifter eller output. 
Consequently, certain results and impacts of the programmes could not yet be measured, unlike the expenditure or outputs.
IV Kommissionen har udstedt grundlžggende vejledning for programmeringsperioden 2007-2013 for at bist medlemsstaterne med at udarbejde deres LDPŐer. 
IV The Commission issued basic guidance for the 2007-2013 programming period to help the Member States to prepare their RDPs.
For programmeringsperioden 2014-2020 har Kommissionen udstedt en mere omfattende vejledning om betingelser for stżtteberettigelse, udvžlgelseskriterier og investeringer. 
As regards the 2014-2020 programming period, the Commission has issued more extensive guidance providing information on eligibility conditions, selection criteria and investments.
V a) Denne anbefaling er rettet til medlemsstaterne. 
V (a) This recommendation is for the Member States.
V b) Kommissionen accepterer denne anbefaling og er begyndt at gennemfżre den. 
V (b) The Commission accepts this recommendation and has started to implement it.
Kommissionens svar 57 Bemžrkninger Kommissionens fžlles svar p punkt 20-22 I programmeringsperioden 2007-2013 blev medlemsstaterne anmodet om at begrunde deres investeringsprioriteter p baggrund af en SWOT-analyse og afdžkning af behov. 
Reply of the Commission 57 Observations Common Commission reply to paragraphs 20-22 In the 2007-2013 programming period, the Member States were requested to justify their investment priorities based on a SWOT analysis of needs.
Koordineringen skulle sikres p nationalt og/eller regionalt plan. 
Coordination was to be ensured at national and/or regional level.
Medlemsstaterne og/eller regionerne har i fžllesskab vurderet behovet for komplementaritet p grundlag af afgržnsningen. 
The Member States and/or regions have been considering together the need for complementarities on the basis of demarcation.
Der er ofte blevet anvendt en integreret tilgang p regionalt og lokalt plan for at optimere EU-medfinansieringen. 
Often integrated approaches at regional and local level have been followed aiming at optimising the EU co-funding.
23 Baseret p erfaringerne fra programmeringsperioden 2007-2013 styrker den retlige ramme for programmeringsperioden 2014-2020 en strategisk tilgang til programmering og żger komplementariteten mellem EU-midler og nationale midler. 
23 Based on lessons learnt during the 2007-2013 programming period, the legal framework for the 2014-2020 programming period reinforces a strategic approach to programming and enhances complementarity among EU and national funds.
24 Interventionerne under LDPŐerne medfinansieres af Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne. 
24 The interventions under the RDPs are co-financed by the Commission and the Member States.
I lyset af knapheden p nationale finansielle ressourcer har ELFUL givet medlemsstaterne og regionerne mulighed for at finansiere interventioner i landdistrikter, der i modsat fald muligvis ikke var blevet finansieret, til gavn for lokalbefolkningen. 
In the context of scarcity of national financial resources, the EAFRD has allowed the Member States and regions to fund interventions in rural areas, which otherwise may have not been financed, to the benefit of local populations.
Tekstboks 2 - Italien (Sicilien) Ifżlge de sicilianske myndigheder havde regionen ingen nationale eller regionale ressourcer til at finansiere strukturinvesteringer. 
Box 2 — Italy (Sicily) According to the Sicilian authorities, the region experienced a lack of national or regional resources to fund structural investments.
I lyset heraf har ELFUL givet regionen mulighed for at finansiere interventioner i landdistrikter, der i modsat fald muligvis ikke var blevet finansieret. 
In this context, the EAFRD has allowed the region to fund interventions in rural areas, which otherwise may have not been financed.
Ved etableringen af den retlige ramme for programmeringsperioden 2014-2020 har Kommissionen truffet de nżdvendige foranstaltninger for at forbedre koordineringen mellem forskellige fonde af stżtte til infrastruktur i landdistrikterne. 
When establishing the legal framework for the 2014-2020 programming period, the Commission has taken the necessary steps to improve coordination between different funds as regards the support to rural infrastructures.
I Kommissionens forskellige tjenestegrene er der fokus p koordineringen af og komplementariteten mellem EU-fondene p strategisk nationalt og regionalt niveau. 
Coordination and complementarity of EU funds at the level of national/ regional strategies is addressed by the different services of the Commission.
Det er imidlertid de nationale og regionale myndigheders opgave at sikre denne koordinering og komplementaritet p foranstaltnings-og projektniveau i forbindelse med gennemfżrelsen af programmerne. 
It is however for national/ regional authorities to enforce such coordination/ complementarity at measure/project levels when implementing the programmes.
Kommissionen vil regelmžssigt overvge og vurdere gennemfżrelsen i medlemsstaterne inden for den fastsatte ramme for overvgning og rapportering. 
The Commission will regularly monitor and assess implementation in the Member States within the established framework for performance monitoring and reporting.
V c) Denne anbefaling er rettet til medlemsstaterne. 
V (c) This recommendation is for the Member States.
V d) Kommissionen accepterer denne anbefaling, men i lyset af den begržnsede vžrdi af at vurdere foranstaltninger isoleret mener Kommissionen, at denne vurdering bżr foretages p de fokusomrder, som afspejler politiske ml. 
V (d) The Commission accepts this recommendation. However, given the limited value of assessing measures in isolation, the Commission is of the opinion that evaluation should be carried out at the level of the focus areas, which reflect policy objectives.
Kommissionen understreger desuden evalueringens betydning for fortolkningen og analysen af de indsamlede data med henblik p at drage konklusioner om produktivitet og effektivitet. 
Moreover, the Commission stresses the importance of evaluation to interpret and analyse the data collected in order to draw conclusions on effectiveness or efficiency.
V e) Denne anbefaling er rettet til medlemsstaterne. 
V (e) This recommendation is for the Member States.
Tekstboks 2 - Tyskland (Sachsen) Erstatningen af offentlige midler, f.eks. i Sachsen, skyldes, at budgetudgifterne i Tyskland er baseret p princippet om etrige budgetter, og at LDP er et flerrigt program (syv r), der gennemfżres i overensstemmelse med Čn+2Ç-reglen. 
Reply of the Commission 58 Box 2 — Germany (Saxony) The substitution of public funds illustrated by the case of Saxony is a consequence of the annuality of budget spending in Germany, while the RDP is a multiannual programme (7 years) for the implementation of which the rule ‘n+ 2’ applies.
25 Erstatningen af offentlige midler med ELFUL-midler p projektniveau betyder ikke nżdvendigvis, at der ikke er nogen ekstra effekt p resultatet. 
25 The substitution of public funds by the EAFRD at project level does not necessarily entail the absence of additional effects on the outcome.
Det er ikke pvist p grundlag af de reviderede projekter, at ELFUL-foranstaltningerne ikke har stżttet investeringer, der ikke opnende et tilstržkkeligt afkast til at berettige de samlede investeringsomkostninger. 
It is not demonstrated, based on the audited projects, that the EAFRD measures have not supported investments for which the financial returns were insufficient to justify the full costs of the investment.
26 Det er ikke et lovkrav, at stżttesatser skal fastsžttes p grundlag af en żkonomisk analyse. En ržkke medlemsstater begrundede imidlertid behovet for LDP-intervention og foretog makrożkonomiske analyser: Đ Det sicilianske LDP indeholder en analyse af landbrug, skovbrug og landdistrikter og identificerer relevante behov. 
However, several Member States justified the need for RDP intervention and conducted macroeconomic analyses. For example: — the Sicily RDP does include an analysis of agriculture, forestry and rural areas and provide for an identification of relevant needs; — the Romania RDP includes a description of the need for infrastructure investments including some quantification of needs.
Medfinansieringssatserne blev fastsat p akseniveau under hensyntagen til makrożkonomiske kriterier. 
The co-financing rates were set up at axis level taking into account macroeconomic criteria.
Se Kommissionens fžlles svar p punkt 20-22. 
See also common Commission reply to paragraphs 20-22.
29 Projekter kan finansieres via ELFUL-stżtte og/eller nationale midler. 
29 Projects can be funded through EAFRD support and/or national resources.
Dette betyder ikke, at nogle projekter ville vžre blevet gennemfżrt, selv uden LDP-midlerne. 
This does not mean that projects would have been implemented even in the absence of the RDP funds.
Efter Kommissionens opfattelse er passende udvžlgelseskriterier et afgżrende middel til at sikre en effektiv mlretning af stżtte. 
The Commission is of the opinion that appropriate selection criteria represent an essential means to ensure an effective targeting of support.
Kontrollen af de enkelte ansżgeres finansielle kapacitet bżr ikke plžgge forvaltningsmyndighederne en uforholdsmžssig stor administrativ byrde. 
The checking of the financial capacity of individual applicants should not lead to a disproportionate administrative burden for the managing authorities.
Kommissionens svar 59 32 I artikel 60 i forordning (EF) nr. 
31 First bullet According to Article 56 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the EAFRD finances only ‘small infrastructure’ in the measure ‘basic services’.
1698/2005 henvises kun til forpligtelsen til at opstille kriterier for afgržnsning af operationer, der stżttes via EU-stżt-teinstrumenter. 
Reply of the Commission 59 32 Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 refers to the obligation of establishing demarcation criteria only in relation to EU support instruments.
Forvaltningen af nationale fonde og etableringen af nationale/regionale koordineringsstrukturer henhżrer under medlemsstaternes ansvar. 
The management of national funds and the setting up of national/regional coordination structures are the responsibility of the Member States.
Overlapningen mellem EU-midler og nationale midler p et givent omrde bringer ikke komplementariteten i fare, s lžnge dobbeltfinansiering af den samme operation undgs. 
The overlapping between the EU and national funds in a given area does not jeopardise complementarity as long as double funding of the same operation is avoided.
33 Flere medlemsstater traf foranstaltninger til at sikre komplementaritet mellem fondene: Đ Rumžnien har etableret en mekanisme til fremme af komplementaritet. 
33 Several Member States took actions to ensure complementarity between the funds.
Đ Italien har fastlagt en ramme, inden for hvilken alle EU-stżttede regionale programmer kan operere i synergi for at opn fžlles ml. 
For example: — Romania set up a mechanism aimed at promoting complementarity; — Italy has set up a framework within which all EU-supported regional programmes can operate in synergy to achieve common objectives.
35 Koordineringen skulle sikres p nationalt og/eller regionalt plan. 
35 Coordination was to be ensured at national and/or regional level.
36 For Rumžniens vedkommende betyder dette enkelte eksempel ikke, at der ikke er komplementaritet mellem fondene. 
36 As regards Romania, this single example does not mean that there is no complementarity between the funds.
For Siciliens vedkommende har Kommissionen anmodet regionen om at pržcisere i udkastet til LDP for 2014-2020, at der ikke kan ydes stżtte til genetablering af veje, som er forfaldet p grund af manglende regelmžssig vedligeholdelse, eller til nye veje i omrder, hvor de eksisterende veje er forfaldet p grund af manglende vedligeholdelse. 
As regards Sicily, the region has been requested by the Commission to clarify in the draft 2014-2020 RDP that no support can be granted for the restructuring of roads which have fallen into disrepair because of a lack of regular maintenance or for new roads in areas already served by roads which have fallen into disrepair because of a lack of maintenance.
38 I perioden 2007-2013 kunne programmer kun godkendes p grundlag af behovsanalyser, der p tilfredsstillende vis understżttede medlemsstaternes strategiske valg. 
38 In 2007-2013, programmes could only be approved in the presence of needs analyses backing satisfactorily the Member States’ strategic choices.
Der kan kun accepteres overlapninger af midler for samme type operationer, sfremt det ikke indebžrer dobbeltfinansiering af de samme foranstaltninger. 
Only overlaps between funds for the same type of operations can be accepted, provided this does not lead to double funding of the same undertakings.
I perioden 2007-2013 blev der opstillet afgržnsningskriterier for at sikre komplementaritet mellem Fžllesskabsstżtteinstrumenter. 
In 2007-2013, complementarity between Community support instruments was sought by the establishment of demarcation criteria.
Se ogs Kommissionens svar p punkt 20-22. 
See also Commission common reply to paragraphs 20-22.
40 Erstatning betyder ikke nżdvendigvis, at de forskellige fonde ikke tilfżrer nogen mervžrdi. 
40 Substitution does not necessarily entail the absence of added value from the different funds.
Erstatning var nżdvendig i nogle tilfžlde p grund af knappe offentlige ressourcer i mange medlemsstater og regioner. 
Substitution was necessary in some cases due to a difficult situation in the public finances of many Member States and regions.
41 Der tages hżjde for komplementariteten mellem de forskellige fondes intervention i partnerskabsaftalerne og i de operationelle programmer og i programmerne for udvikling af landdistrikterne. 
41 Complementarity in the intervention by different funds is considered in the partnership agreements and at the level of operational and rural development programmes.
Den rumžnske partnerskabsaftale indeholder oplysninger om synergier mellem forskellige fonde og nžrmere oplysninger om koordineringsmekanis-mer. 
The Romanian partnership agreement contains information on synergies between different funds and details of coordination mechanisms.
I faktabladene for de enkelte foranstaltninger har Rumžnien angivet mulig komplementaritet og koordinering med andre fonde. 
Moreover, at the level of individual measure fiches, Romania has indicated possible complementarity and coordination with other funds.
Spżrgsmlet om komplementaritet er blevet drżftet indgende med medlemsstaterne under forhandlingerne om LDPŐerne for 2014-2020. 
The issue of complementarity was extensively discussed with the Member States during the negotiations regarding the 2014-2020 RDPs.
Kommissionen har givet medlemsstaterne passende vejledning om disse spżrgsml. 
The Commission has provided appropriate guidance to the Member States on these issues.
Kommissionens svar 60 I udkastet til LDP for 2014-2020 for Sicilien, som var i godkendelsesfasen p tidspunktet for revisionen, redegżres for mekanismerne til fremme af komplementaritet mellem de forskellige EU-fonde. 
The draft 2014-2020 RDP for Sicily, the approval of which was ongoing at the time of the audit, does provide a description of the mechanisms to promote the complementarity between the different EU funds.
Tekstboks 7 Đ Italien (Sicilien) De gžldende betingelser for stżtteberettigelse og udvžlgelseskriterier er defineret i det sicilianske LDP, der er godkendt af Kommissionen. 
Box 7 — Italy (Sicily) The applicable eligibility conditions and selection criteria are only those defined in the Sicily RDP, as approved by the Commission.
Der bżr ikke stilles stżtteberettigelsesbetingelser i indkaldelsen af forslag, der ržkker ud over de betingelser, som er defineret i LDPŐet. 
The call for proposals should not set eligibility conditions in addition to or alternative to those defined in the RDP.
Regionen bżr heller ikke gennemfżre LDP-foranstaltninger p grundlag af kriterier, der ikke er opstillet i faktabladet for den pgžldende foranstaltning som beskrevet i LDPŐet. 
Nor should the region implement RDP measures according to criteria which are not foreseen by the relevant measure fiche as described in the RDP.
Det henhżrer under forvaltningsmyndighedens ansvar at sikre en korrekt gennemfżrelse af programmet. 
It is the responsibility of the managing authority to ensure the correct implementation of the programme.
45 Det forventes, at de identificerede svagheder afhjžlpes i LDPŐerne for 2014-2020. 
45 The weaknesses identified are expected to be addressed in the 2014-2020 RDPs.
I henhold til artikel 49 i forordning (EU) nr. 
Article 49 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 requires that selection criteria are applied according to a transparent and well-evidenced procedure.
Det anfżres udtrykkeligt i Kommissionens vejledning om stżtteberettigelses- og udvžlgelseskriterier for LDPŐerne for 2014-2020, at udvžlgelseskriterierne bżr anvendes, selv om forvaltningsmyndigheden er den eneste stżttemodtager. 
In addition, the Commission's guidance on eligibility and selection criteria for the 2014-2020 RDPs specifically mentions that selection criteria should be applied even when the managing authority is the sole beneficiary.
47 I Polen var stżttemodtagerne af denne foranstaltning regionale organer med ansvar for vandinfrastruktur, der bl.a. er ansvarlige for en korrekt udvžlgelse af projekter. 
47 In Poland, the beneficiaries of this measure were regional bodies responsible for water infrastructure, which are, inter alia, responsible for the proper selection of projects.
Kommissionens svar 61 56 Selv om indfżrelse af krav om indsendelse af en vedligeholdelsesplan kan anses for at vžre god praksis i forbindelse med visse investeringer, er det ikke et retskrav. 
Reply of the Commission 61 56 While requiring the submission of a maintenance plan may be considered as a good practice for certain investments, there is no legal obligation to do so.
57 Kommissionen har ligeledes identificeret denne risiko, og p baggrund af rettens specifikke konklusioner om dette spżrgsml er der blevet taget hżjde for risikoen i den rumžnske handlingsplan for fejlprocenter. 
57 The Commission has also identified this risk, and following the Court’s specific findings on this issue, it has been included in the Romanian error rate action plan.
58 LDPŐet for 2014-2020 for Sicilien var ikke godkendt p tidspunktet for revisionen. 
58 The 2014-2020 RDP for Sicily had not been approved at the time of the audit.
Efter forhandlingerne med de regionale myndigheder er det blevet besluttet, at omkostningerne til disse projekter ikke vil blive stżttet under LDPŐet for 2014-2020. 
Following negotiations with the regional authorities, it has been decided that the costs of these projects will not be supported under the 2014-2020 RDP.
60 I henhold til artikel 71 i forordning (EU) nr. 1303/2013 indledes perioden p fem r i programmeringsperioden 2014-2020 ikke p tidspunktet for godkendelse af ansżgningen, men fżrst p tidspunktet for den endelige betaling til stżttemodtageren. 
60 According to Article 71 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, in the 2014-2020 programming period the 5-year period cannot start at the time of approval of the application but will start with the last payment to the beneficiary.
61 Under forhandlingerne om programmeringsperioden for 2014-2020 opfordrede Kommissionen medlemsstaterne til at fremskynde de administrative processer, sledes at stżttemodtagerne kan gennemfżre operationerne fra begyndelsen af programmeringsperioden. 
61 During the 2014-2020 programming period negotiations the Commission encouraged the Member States to speed up the administrative processes so that beneficiaries can implement the operations from the beginning of the programming period.
62 Selv om fastsžttelse af administrative frister kan anses for at vžre god praksis, er der ingen retlige bestemmelser, som bemyndiger Kommissionen til at tvinge medlemsstaterne til at fastsžtte sdanne frister. 
62 While setting administrative deadlines may be considered as a good practice, there are no legal provisions that empower the Commission to force Member States to set such deadlines.
63 Medlemsstaterne er blevet gjort opmžrksom p betydningen af en rettidig gennemfżrelse af foranstaltningerne for at sikre en vellykket gennemfżrelse af programmerne og en effektiv anvendelse af EU-midler under de rlige statusmżder og mżderne i overvgningsudvalget. 
63 The Member States have been reminded of the importance of a timely implementation of the measures to ensure a successful execution of the programmes and an efficient use of EU funds during the annual review meetings and the meetings of the monitoring committees.
67 Under sine revisioner har Kommissionen identificeret svagheder, der minder om dem, Retten har konstateret, ssom uoverensstemmelser i forbindelse med udvžlgelse af projekter, omkostningernes rimelighed eller manglende overholdelse af bestemmelser om offentlige udbud. 
67 The Commission's audits found similar weaknesses to those identified by the Court, such as non-conformities with regard to the selection of projects, the reasonableness of the costs or non-compliances with public procurement provisions.
P baggrund af resultaterne af disse revisioner forpligtede de reviderede medlemsstater sig til at tržffe korrigerende foranstaltninger for at forbedre resultaterne p ovennžvnte omrder. 
Based on the findings of these audits, the audited Member States undertook to take corrective measures in order to improve the performance of the abovementioned areas.
70 Den eneste udestende žndring af den (nationale) lovgivning om offentlige udbud i Polen trdte i kraft den 19. oktober 2014. 
70 The only outstanding modification of the (national) public procurement law in Poland entered into force on 19 October 2014.
Kommissionen vurderer lovgivningen i żjeblikket. 
Assessment by the Commission is ongoing.
Rumžnien udarbejdede en styrket handlingsplan for disse forhndsbetingelser i 2015 i samarbejde med Kommissionens tjenestegrene. 
Romania did develop during 2015, in conjunction with the Commission services, a reinforced action plan for this ex ante conditionality.
Denne blev vedtaget af de rumžnske myndigheder den 9. juli 2015 og gennemfżres i żjeblikket i alle programmerne for ESI-fondene. 
This was adopted by the Romanian authorities on 9 July 2015 and is now being implemented for all ESIF programmes.
71 Vurderingen af omkostningernes rimelighed er i vidt omfang omhandlet i vejledningen om kontrol og sanktioner i forbindelse med udvikling af landdistrikterne, der ligeledes omfatter oplysninger om anvendelsen af referencepriser. 
71 The assessment of reasonableness of costs has been largely covered in the guidance on controls and penalties for rural development, which also includes information on the use of reference prices.
Kommissionens svar 62 72 Infrastrukturprojekterne skal sikre, at der i de fżrste fem r efter den endelige betaling ikke sker en vžsentlig žndring, der berżrer projekternes art, ml eller gennemfżrelsesvilkr, som ville fżre til underminering af deres oprindelige ml. 
Reply of the Commission 62 72 Infrastructure projects must ensure that during the 5 years following the final payment, there is no substantial change of the projects affecting their nature, objectives or implementation conditions which would result in undermining of their original objectives.