natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For at fremme etableringen af net med meget høj kapacitet, navnlig i økonomisk mindre levedygtige områder som f.eks. i områder med lav befolkningstæthed eller landdistrikter, har Kommissionen allerede foreslået, at der i de reviderede EU-telekommunikationsregler, som der for øjeblikket forhandles om mellem EU's medlovgivere, medtages en særlig artikel om rene engrosvirksomheder. 
In order to incentivize the deployment of very high capacity networks, in particular in economically less viable areas such as low population density/rural areas, the Commission has already proposed to introduce in the revised EU telecom rules, currently being negotiated between the EU co-legislators - a specific article dealing with wholesale-only undertakings.
Dette forslag har til formål at tilskynde til investeringer gennem fastlæggelse af en forenklet tilsynsmodel for rene engrosnet med en betydelig markedsposition, der er begrænset til fair, rimelige og ikkediskriminerende adgangsregler. 
This proposal aims to incentivise investment through the definition of a simplified regulatory model proposed for wholesale-only networks with a significant market position, limited to fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory access rules.
Kommissionen vil overvåge gennemførelsen af denne foranstaltning. 
The Commission will monitor the transposition of this measure.
Statsstøtte kræver således allerede effektiv engrosadgang til subsidieret infrastruktur i alle områder (hvide, grå eller sorte). 
Indeed, State Aid rules already require effective wholesale access to subsidized infrastructure in all areas (white, grey or black).
Endvidere betragtes rene engrosprojekter allerede som særligt konkurrencefremmende og behandles gunstigt i statsstøttereglerne. 
Moreover wholesale only projects are already considered especially pro-competitive and treated favourably under State aid rules.
For eksempel kan der i forbindelse med konkurrencebaserede procedurer for tildeling af statsstøtte tildeles ekstra point til rene engrosprojekter. 
For instance, competitive procedures to award State aid can award additional points to wholesale only projects.
Den kommende vejledning om investeringer i bredbånd vil indeholde supplerende vejledning (navnlig ajourføring af afsnittet om forretningsmodeller, der allerede findes i vejledningen om investeringer i højhastighedsbredbånd) og fremhæve disse aspekter. 
The forthcoming Guide on Broadband investment will provide additional guidance (notably updating the section on business models already provided in the Guide to High-speed Broadband investment) and highlight these aspects.
7) Kommissionen accepterer anbefalingen. 
(7) The Commission accepts the recommendation.
Kommissionen vil yde vejledning og formidle bedste praksis vedrørende det spørgsmål, som Revisionsretten har anbefalet, samt andre relevante investeringsspørgsmål gennem netværket af kompetencekontorer vedrørende bredbånd og dens gennemgang af vejledningen om investeringer i bredbånd. 
The Commission will provide guidance and disseminate best practices on the matter recommended by the ECA as well as on other relevant investment issues through the activity of the Broadband Competence Offices Network and its review of it Broadband Investment Guide.
Kommissionen vil navnlig præcisere de risici og muligheder, der er knyttet til projekternes forskellige størrelse, forskellige teknologier og investeringer, modeller med henblik på at forbedre investeringernes levedygtighed, fremme konkurrencen, lette indtrængningen på markedet og lette adgangen til langfristet finansiering. 
The Commission will in particular clarify the risks and opportunities attached to the different size of projects, different technologies and investment, models with a view to improve the viability of investment, promote competition, facilitate penetration and ease access to long-term financing.
8) EIB mener, at der er størst behov for offentlig støtte i form af tilskud i forbindelse med projekter, som ingen privat investor er rede til at støtte på grund af manglende økonomisk levedygtighed. 
(8) The EIB considers that grant-type public sector support is most needed for projects that no private investor is ready to support because of their lack of economic viability.
1, litra a), i EFSI-forordningen (forordning 2015/1017) bør EFSI målrette sin finansiering mod projekter, der er økonomisk levedygtige som bekræftet af en cost-benefit-analyse. 
According to Article 6(1)(a) of the EFSI Regulation 2015/1017, EFSI should target projects that are economically viable, as confirmed by a cost-benefit analysis.
Kommissionen bemærker, at det allerede indgår i CEBF's udkast til investeringsretningslinjer, at fonden bør yde støtte på op til 30 mio. EUR til en enkelt virksomhed og generelt til nye bredbåndsprojekter, overvejende i hvide og grå områder. 
The Commission notes that the draft CEBF investment guidelines already foresee that the Fund should provide support for up to EUR30 million to one single company and generally to greenfield broadband projects, predominantly in white and grey areas.
Endvidere har Kommissionen allerede taget skridt til at indgå aftale med CEBF's fondsforvalter om passende rapporteringsforpligtelser, der skal fastlægges nærmere i en tillægsskrivelse. 
Furthermore, the Commission has already taken steps to agree with the CEBF Fund Manager on appropriate reporting obligations, which are to be still defined in a Side Letter.
Profilen af de projekter, der støttes af CEBF (nye projekter, der gennemføres af mindre projektledere), er forenelig med vores interesse i at etablere bredbånd i underforsynede områder (grå og hvide områder). 
The profile of the projects supported by the CEBF (greenfield projects undertaken by smaller project promoters) is in line with our interest to deploy in underserved (grey and white) areas.
Bredbånd, dvs. hurtigere og bedre adgang til internettet, bliver stadig vigtigere, og det gælder ikke blot for virksomhedernes konkurrenceevne, men også for fremme af social inklusion. 
Broadband, meaning faster, better quality access to the internet, is becoming increasingly important not only for business competitiveness, but also for helping social inclusion.
EU har som en del af sin Europa 2020-strategi fastsat mål for bredbåndsdækningen, herunder at alle europæere skal have adgang til hurtigt bredbånd i 2020. 
As part of its Europe 2020 strategy, the EU has set targets for broadband, including fast broadband availability for all Europeans by 2020.
Med henblik på at støtte disse mål har EU stillet ca. 15 milliarder euro til rådighed for medlemsstaterne i perioden 2014-2020. 
To support these objectives, the EU has made some 15 billion euro available to Member States in the period 2014-2020.
Vi konstaterede, at bredbåndsdækningen generelt er blevet forbedret i EU, men at Europa 2020-målene ikke alle vil kunne nås. 
We found that broadband coverage has generally been improving across the EU, but that the Europe 2020 targets will not all be achieved.
I landdistrikterne, hvor der er færre incitamenter for den private sektor til at investere, er forbindelsen stadig ikke så god som i byerne, og udnyttelsen af ultrahurtigt bredbånd ligger langt under målet DEN EUROPÆISKE REVISIONSRET 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tlf. +352 4398-1 Kontakt: eca.europa.eu/da/Pages/ContactForm.aspx Websted: eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditors ©Den Europæiske Union, 2018. 
Rural areas, where there is less incentive for the private sector to invest, remain less well connected than cities, and take up of ultra-fast broadband is significantly behind target.
DA 2018 Sžrberetning nr. 13 Bekžmpelse af radikalisering, der fżrer til terrorisme: Kommissionen adresserede medlemsstaternes behov, men der var nogle mangler i koordineringen og evalueringen (artikel 287, stk. 
EN 2018 Special Report NO 13 Tackling radicalisation that leads to terrorism: the Commission addressed the needs of Member States, but with some shortfalls in coordination and evaluation (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU)
REVISIONSHOLDET Revisionsrettens sžrberetninger pržsenterer resultaterne af dens revisioner vedrżrende EU-politikker og -programmer eller forvaltningsspżrgsml i forbindelse med specifikke budgetomrder. 
AUDIT TEAM The ECAŐs special reports set out the results of its audits of EU policies and programmes, or of management-related topics from specific budgetary areas.
Denne forvaltningsrevision blev udfżrt af Afdeling V - der ledes af Lazaros S. Lazarou, medlem af Revisionsretten - hvis speciale er finansiering og forvaltning af EU. 
This performance audit was carried out by Audit Chamber V Financing and administration of the EU, headed by ECA Member Lazaros S. Lazarou.
Revisionsarbejdet blev ledet af Jan Gregor, medlem af Revisionsretten, med stżtte fra kabinetschef Werner Vlasselaer og attach Bernard Moya, ledende administrator Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, opgaveansvarlig Mark Marshall samt revisorerne Alexandre-Kim Hug og Pascale Pucheux-Lallemand. 
The audit was led by ECA Member Jan Gregor, supported by Werner Vlasselaer, Head of Private Office and Bernard Moya Private Office Attach; Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, Principal Manager; Mark Marshall, Head of Task; Alexandre-Kim Hug and Pascale Pucheux-Lallemand, Auditors.
Fra venstre til hżjre: Werner Vlasselaer, Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, Mark Marshall, Bernard Moya, Pascale Pucheux-Lallemand, Jan Gregor. 
From left to right: Werner Vlasselaer, Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, Mark Marshall, Bernard Moya, Pascale Pucheux-Lallemand, Jan Gregor.
Glossar Resum Indledning Punkt I-VIII 1-10 1-3 4-10 11-14 11-13 14 15-36 15-21 16-19 20-21 22-28 23-25 26-27 28 29-36 30-31 32-36 37-42 INDHOLD EU stżtter medlemsstaterne i deres bestržbelser p at bekžmpe terrorisme Kommissionen anvender en bred vifte af aktioner til at hjžlpe medlemsstaterne med at bekžmpe radikalisering Revisionens omfang og revisionsmetoden Revisionens omfang Revisionsmetoden Bemžrkninger Stżtten er relevant og veludformet Kommissionen adresserede medlemsstaternes behov, med f undtagelser Stżtten er udformet sdan, at medlemsstaterne har fordel af, at der gżres en indsats p europžisk niveau Kommissionen fremmer synergier, men koordineringen kan forbedres Kommissionen fremmer synergier Der er nogle mangler i koordineringen RAN's potentiale udnyttes ikke fuldt ud Kommissionens ramme for resultatvurdering er ikke tilstržkkelig udviklet Kommissionen evaluerer ikke sin samlede succes med hensyn til at opfylde politikmlene Kommissionen kan ikke dokumentere, hvor effektive dens enkelte aktioner faktisk er Konklusioner og anbefalinger Bilag - Eksempler p EU-finansierede aktioner til bekžmpelse af radikalisering Kommissionens svar 2 
Glossary Executive summary Introduction Paragraph I - VIII CONTENTS The EU supports Member States in their efforts to combat terrorism The Commission deploys a wide range of actions to help Member States address radicalisation Audit scope and approach Audit scope Audit approach Observations Support is relevant and well designed The Commission addressed the needs of Member States, with few exceptions Support is designed to bring benefits to Member States from acting at European level The Commission fosters synergies, but coordination could be improved The Commission fosters synergies There are some coordination shortfalls The RAN is not used to its full potential The CommissionŐs framework for assessing results is insufficiently developed The Commission does not evaluate its overall success in achieving policy goals The Commission cannot demonstrate how effective its individual actions actually are Conclusions and recommendations Annex - Examples of EU-funded actions addressing radicalisation Replies of the Commission 1 - 1 4 - 11 - 11 - 15 - 15 - 16 - 20 - 22 - 23 - 26 - 29 - 30 - 32 - 37 - 10 - 3 10 14 13 14 36 21 19 21 28 25 27 28 36 31 36 42 2
4 RESUM I. EU-medlemsstaterne har ansvaret for deres nationale sikkerhed, herunder for at bekžmpe terrorisme. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. European Union (EU) Member States are responsible for national security, including the fight against terrorism.
De er ansvarlige for at udforme og gennemfżre nationale foranstaltninger til bekžmpelse af radikalisering, som er det fžnomen, at personer tilslutter sig ekstremistiske ideologier og adfžrdsformer, der kan f dem til at beg terrorhandlinger. 
They are in charge of designing and implementing measures at national level that aim to tackle radicalisation, i.e. the phenomenon of people embracing extremist ideologies and behaviours which could lead them to commit acts of terrorism.
Eftersom radikalisering skyldes flere faktorer, anvendes der generelt en bred vifte af forebyggende foranstaltninger til at adressere problemet. 
As radicalisation is caused by several factors, a wide range of preventive actions are generally deployed to address the problem.
Kommissionens rolle er at stżtte medlemsstaternes bestržbelser og medvirke til at sikre, at gode praksis bliver udvekslet. 
The CommissionŐs role is to support Member States in their efforts and help to ensure that good practices are exchanged.
Til det forml tržkker Kommissionen p en stadig bredere vifte af EU-fonde. 
To do so, the Commission draws on an increasingly wide range of EU funds.
Formlet med vores revision var at undersżge, om Kommissionen forvalter denne tvžrgende stżtte godt. 
Our audit examined whether the Commission manages this cross-cutting support well.
Vi vurderede navnlig: a) om Kommissionen giver medlemsstaterne relevant stżtte b) om de aktioner, der finansieres af de forskellige EU-fonde, bliver koordineret med henblik p at udnytte eventuelle synergier bedst muligt c) om Kommissionen har indfżrt en ramme til at vurdere, om dens stżtte er effektiv og giver valuta for pengene. III. 
In particular, we assessed whether: the Commission provides Member States with relevant support; the actions financed by the different EU funds are coordinated to make the most of any synergies; the Commission has put in place a framework to assess the effectiveness and value for money of its support. 4 III. there were some shortfalls in coordination and evaluation.
Samlet set konstaterede vi, at Kommissionen adresserede medlemsstaternes behov, men at der var nogle mangler i koordineringen og evalueringen. 
Overall, we found that the Commission addressed the needs of Member States, but IV.
Kommissionen fremmede samarbejde mellem medlemsstaterne gennem relevante initiativer ssom netvžrket til bevidstgżrelse omkring radikalisering (RAN), EU's internetforum og det europžiske strategiske kommunikationsnet. 
The Commission promoted cooperation between Member States through relevant initiatives such as the Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN), the EU Internet Forum and the European Strategic Communications Network.
V. Kommissionen koordinerede sin tvžrgende stżtte, f.eks. ved hjžlp af tvžrtjenstlige hżringer mellem generaldirektoraterne i forbindelse med godkendelse af arbejdsprogrammer. 
V. The Commission coordinated its cross-cutting support, for example, by means of consultation between directorates-general when approving work programmes.
Dette har resulteret i synergier mellem dens aktioner. 
This has resulted in synergies between its actions.
Trods nylige forbedringer er der imidlertid stadig muligheder for at forbedre koordineringen af aktionerne. 
However, despite recent improvements, there is still scope to improve the coordination of Commission actions.
F.eks. omfatter Kommissionens overblik over de EU-finansierede aktioner p dette omrde ikke dem, der forvaltes af medlemsstaterne, selv om dette ville vžre nyttigt 5 med henblik p at udnytte potentielle synergier optimalt. 
For example, the CommissionŐs overview of EU-funded actions in this area does not include those managed by Member States, which would be useful to make the most of potential synergies. We also
Vi konstaterede ogs, at RAN, som er et af Kommissionens vigtigste initiativer, ikke blev udnyttet fuldt ud til at formidle resultaterne af vellykkede EU-finansierede projekter. 
found that the RAN, one of the CommissionŐs main initiatives, was not used to its full potential to disseminate the results of successful EU-funded projects.
Kommissionen har ikke i tilstržkkelig grad udviklet sin ramme for vurdering af, om dens stżtte er effektiv og giver valuta for pengene. 
The Commission has not sufficiently developed its framework for assessing whether its support is effective and offers value for money.
F.eks. har den ikke opdelt de overordnede politikml i mere specifikke og mlbare ml, og de midler, den har anvendt, er ikke ledsaget af indikatorer og mlsžtninger, der kan bruges til at mle fremskridtene med hensyn til at bekžmpe radikalisering. 
For example, it has not broken down the overall policy objectives into more specific and measurable objectives, and the funds that the Commission has used are not accompanied by indicators and targets designed to measure success in addressing radicalisation.
Der er derfor en risiko for, at nyttige erfaringer ikke bliver formidlet eller taget i betragtning, nr Kommissionen udformer andre aktioner eller videreudvikler sin politik. 
As a result, there is a risk that useful lessons might not be disseminated or taken into account when the Commission designs actions or develops its policy further.
P grundlag af sine bemžrkninger anbefaler Revisionsretten, at Kommissionen: forbedrer rammen for den overordnede koordinering af aktioner til bekžmpelse af radikalisering styrker den praktiske stżtte til fagfolk og politiske beslutningstagere i medlemsstaterne forbedrer rammen for resultatvurdering. 6 
On the basis of its findings, the ECA recommends that the Commission should: improve the framework for overall coordination of actions addressing radicalisation; increase practical support to practitioners and policymakers in Member States; and improve the framework for assessing results. 5
INDLEDNING EU stżtter medlemsstaterne i deres bestržbelser p at bekžmpe terrorisme 1. 
INTRODUCTION The EU supports Member States in their efforts to combat terrorism 1.
Medlemsstaterne har ansvaret for deres nationale sikkerhed1. 
Member States are responsible for their national security1.
De har udviklet forskellige tilgange til terrorbekžmpelse baseret p deres evaluering af risiciene. 
They have developed different approaches to counter-terrorism according to their evaluation of the risks.
EU's rolle er at bestržbe sig p at sikre et hżjt sikkerhedsniveau2 ved at fremme udveksling af oplysninger, operationelt samarbejde og udveksling af viden og erfaringer. 
The EUŐs role is to endeavour to ensure a high level of security2 by facilitating exchanges of information, operational cooperation and sharing of knowledge and experiences.
I 2015 beskrev den europžiske dagsorden om sikkerhed4, hvordan EU kunne stżtte medlemsstaterne i terrorbekžmpelsen. 
The 2015 European Agenda on Security4 set out how the EU could support Member States in countering terrorism.
Den fokuserede p forebyggelse af radikalisering og p den trussel, der udgżres af udenlandske terrorkrigere (som vender tilbage til Europa efter at have sluttet sig til terrorgrupper i konfliktomrder). 
It focused on the prevention of radicalisation and the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters (those returning to Europe after having joined terrorist groups in conflict zones).
Den understregede behovet for at beskytte borgere og kritiske infrastrukturer bedre og for at adressere terrorbekžmpelse Artikel 4, stk. 
It emphasised the need to protect citizens and critical infrastructure better, and to address the fight against terrorism outside the EU.
2, i traktaten om Den Europžiske Union fastsžtter, at den nationale sikkerhed forbliver den enkelte medlemsstats eneansvar. 
It underlined Article 4.2 of the Treaty on European Union states that national security remains the sole responsibility of each Member State.
Artikel 67 i traktaten om Den Europžiske Unions funktionsmde fastsžtter, at Unionen skal bestržbe sig p at sikre et hżjt sikkerhedsniveau. 
Article 67 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union states that the Union shall endeavour to ensure a high level of security.
Artikel 82-89 giver mulighed for politisamarbejde og retligt samarbejde. 
Articles 82 to 89 provide for police and judicial cooperation.
Den Europžiske Unions terrorbekžmpelsesstrategi af 30. november 2005, 14469/4/05, vedtaget den 15. december 2005. 
The European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy, 30 November 2005, 14469/4/05, adopted on 15 December 2005.
7 1 2 3 4 COM(2015) 185 final af 28. april 2015 "Den europžiske dagsorden om sikkerhed". 
6 1 2 3 4 COM(2015) 185 final of 28 April 2015 ŇThe European Agenda on SecurityÓ.
Den understregede betydningen af at straffe terrorister og deres stżtter og at afskžre deres adgang til finansiering, skydevben og spržngstoffer. 
the importance of penalising terrorists and their backers, and of cutting their access to funds, firearms and explosives.
Og den understregede ogs behovet for bedre informationsudveksling med henblik p sporing af de personer, der deltager i terroraktiviteter. 
It also highlighted the need for better exchanges of information in order to track those engaged in terrorist activities.
Flere forskellige EU-institutioner og -organer er involveret i EU's terrorbekžmpelse. 
Various EU institutions and bodies are involved in EU counter-terrorism.
Gennem sine meddelelser bidrager Kommissionen til den EU-strategi, som Rdet vedtager i form af rdskonklusioner. 
Through its communications, the Commission contributes to the EU strategy adopted by the Council in the form of Council conclusions.
Den tager ogs initiativ til retsakter om terrorbekžmpelse, som drżftes og vedtages af Europa-Parlamentet og Rdet5. 
It also initiates legislative acts on combating terrorism for negotiation and adoption by the European Parliament and the Council5.
Den er ansvarlig for at sikre en forsvarlig żkonomisk forvaltning af EU's midler og for at koordinere sine forskellige generaldirektorater og overvge sine agenturer ved ydelsen af stżtte til medlemsstaterne. 
It is responsible for the sound financial management of EU funds and for coordinating its various directorates-general and monitoring its agencies in providing support for Member States.
Kommissžren med ansvar for sikkerhedsunionen arbejder under ledelse af den fżrste nžstformand og stżtter det arbejde, som kommissžren med ansvar for migration, indre anliggender og medborgerskab udfżrer i forbindelse med Kommissionens sikkerhedsmžssige reaktion p terrorisme. 
The Commissioner for the Security Union works under the guidance of the First Vice-President and supports the work of the Commissioner for Migration, Home Affairs and Citizenship in ensuring the CommissionŐs security response to terrorism.
Rdets antiterrorkoordinator har til opgave at fżlge op p den samlede gennemfżrelse af EU's terrorbekžmpelsesstrategi og sikre, at EU spiller en aktiv rolle i terrorbekžmpelsen. 
The role of the CouncilŐs Counter-Terrorism Coordinator is to follow up the overall implementation of the EUŐs counter-terrorism strategy and to ensure the EU plays an active role in the fight against terrorism.
Kommissionen anvender en bred vifte af aktioner til at hjžlpe medlemsstaterne med at bekžmpe radikalisering 4. 
The Commission deploys a wide range of actions to help Member States address radicalisation 4.
Bekžmpelse af radikalisering er en central komponent i kampen mod terrorisme. 
Addressing radicalisation is a key component of the fight against terrorism.
Hovedparten af de mistžnkte i forbindelse med de seneste terrorangreb i Europa var europžiske borgere, som var blevet radikaliseret6. 
The majority of suspects involved in the recent terrorist attacks in Europe were European citizens who had been radicalised6.
I sine meddelelser om stżtte til medlemsstaternes bekžmpelse af radikalisering, der fżrer til terrorisme7, har Kommissionen F.eks. 
In its Communications on supporting Member States in addressing radicalisation that leads to terrorism7, the Commission takes the view that radicalisation is usually the result of a combination of factors.