natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(1) Det Forenede Kongerige forbżd anvendelse af kżd-og benmel fra drżvtyggere i kvžgfoder i 1988. 
(1) The United Kingdom banned ruminant derived MBM for cattle in 1988.
Andre medlemsstater indfżrte forbud senere: Żstrig (proteiner fra pattedyr i drżvtyggerfoder, december 1990); Danmark (proteiner fra drżvtyggere i drżvtyggerfoder, juni 1990); Finland (proteiner fra pattedyr i drżvtyggerfoder, marts 1995); Frankrig (proteiner fra pattedyr i kvžgfoder, juli 1990, proteiner fra pattedyr i foder til alle drżvtyggere, august 1994, og alle animalske proteiner undtagen mžlk og fisk i drżvtyggerfoder, juli 1996); Irland (proteiner fra drżvtyggere i drżvtyggerfoder, august 1990); Nederlandene (proteiner fra drżvtyggere i drżvtyggerfoder, august 1989); Sverige (kżd-og benmel fra drżvtyggere i drżvtyggerfoder, december 1990, og proteiner fra drżvtyggere i foder til alle dyr, december 1997). Fżlgende medlemsstater havde ikke indfżrt forbud, fżr det fžlles EU-forbud mod proteiner fra pattedyr i drżvtyggerfoder blev indfżrt i 1994: Belgien, Tyskland, Gržkenland, Italien, Luxembourg og Spanien. Kilde: GD VI-kontrolrapporter fra 1996. 
Other Member States introduced their feed bans in: Austria (mammalian protein for ruminants in December 1990); Denmark (ruminant proteins for ruminants in June 1990); Finland (mammalian proteins for ruminants in March 1995); France (mammalian proteins for bovines in July 1990; mammalian proteins for all ruminants in December 1994 and all animal proteins except milk and fish for ruminants in July 1996); Ireland (ruminant protein for ruminants in August 1990); Netherlands (ruminant proteins for ruminants in August 1989); Sweden (ruminant MBM for ruminants in December 1990, and ruminants proteins for all animals in December 1997); Member States that had no feed ban in place until the EU-wide ban on mammalian proteins for ruminants in 1994: Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lux-2 embourg and Spain.
Kommissionens beslutning 94/381/EF af 27. juni 1994 om forbud mod anvendelse af pattedyrvžv i foder til drżvtyggere, som žndret, med virkning fra 4. juli 1994 (EFT L 172 af 7.7.1994, s. 
Source: DG VI mission reports in 1996. () Commission Decision 94/381/EC of 27 June 1994 on the ban on use of proteins derived from mammalian tissue for feeding ruminants, as 3 amended, with effect from 4 July 1994 (OJ L 172, 7.7.1994, p.
23) Det Forenede Kongerige havde forbud mod at eksportere kżd-og benmel fremstillet af pattedyr fżr 1. januar 1995 og mtte kun eksportere kżd-og benmel fremstillet efter den dato, hvis de anbefalede normer for forarbejdning var overholdt. 
23). () The United Kingdom was banned from exporting mammalian MBM produced before 1 January 1995, and was allowed to export MBM produced after that date only if the recommended processing standards had been complied with.
2 ( ) 3 () 4 () 5 () 6 () 7 () Belgien, Tyskland, Spanien, Frankrig, Irland, Italien, Luxembourg, Por-8 tugal (indtil juli 1999) og Finland. () Kommissionens tjenesters arbejdsdokument af april 2001, ref. 
7 () Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Portu-8 gal (up to July 1999) and Finland. () Source: working document of the Commission services, April 2001, ref.
SANCO/ 9 1531/2001 rev.1 ČUse of Processed Animal Proteins in Animal FeedÇ. () VSKŐs udtalelse af 27.-28. november 2000 om det videnskabelige grundlag for at forbyde animalsk protein i foder til alle husdyr, her-10 under svin, fjerkrž, fisk og kžledyr. () Rdets beslutning 2000/766/EF af 4. december 2000 om en ržkke beskyttelsesforanstaltninger over for overfżrbare spongiforme encephalopatier og fodring med animalsk protein, midlertidigt forbud fra 1. januar til 30. juni 2001 (EFT L 306, 7.12.2000, s. 
SANCO/1531/2001 Rev.1 ÔUse of processed animal proteins in 9 animal feedŐ. () SSC opinion of 27/28 November 2000 on the scientific basis for banning animal protein from the feed for all farmed animals, includ-10 ing pigs, poultry, fish and pet animals. () Council Decision 2000/766/EC of 4 December 2000 concerning certain protection measures with regard to transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and the feeding of animal protein, temporary ban from 1 January to 30 June 2001 (OJ L 306, 7.12.2000, p.
20.11.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 324/15 33. 
20.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 324/15 33.
Medlemsstaterne hndhžvede ikke foderforbuddet strengt nok, og hertil kom, at Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontorets inspektioner tyder p, at foderindustrien (herunder udsmeltnings-virksomheder og foderstoffabrikker) ikke gjorde nok for at forhindre kontaminering af kvžgfoder med kżd-og benmel, og at foder med kżd-og benmel ikke altid var mžrket korrekt (i Tyskland, Gržkenland, Spanien, Frankrig, Italien, Żstrig, Portugal, Finland og Sverige). 
In addition to the failure of Member States to implement the feed ban, there is evidence from the FVO inspections that the agro-feed industry (including renderers and feed mills) did not do enough to avoid contamination of cattle feed by MBM, and that feed containing MBM was not always correctly labelled (in Germany, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Portugal, Finland and Sweden).
Disse mangler var medvirkende til, at landbrugere uden at vide det gav deres kvžg foder, som kunne indeholde BSE-agens. 
These failures contributed to farmers inadvertently using potentially infective feed for their cattle.
Det midlertidige forbud mod anvendelse af kżd-og benmel i foder til alle husdyr, ordningen for opkżb til destruktion og forbuddet mod anvendelse af bestemte vžvstyper fra dyr (SRM) medfżrer, at animalsk affald skal bortskaffes p en sikker mde, uden at det skader miljżet. 
The temporary ban on the use of MBM for all farm animals, the purchase for destruction scheme and prohibition of the use of certain animal tissues (SRMs) will create animal waste that has to be disposed of safely and without a negative impact on the environment.
Det skżnnes, at der i EU hvert r blev anvendt 16 millioner ton animalsk affald til dyrefoder, fżr det nuvžrende foderforbud blev indfżrt (1). 
Before the current feed ban (1), an estimated 16 million tonnes of animal waste was recycled for animal feed every year in the EU.
Kommissionen mener, at det p kort og mellemlang sigt vil vžre mest almindeligt at bortskaffe dette affald ved at forarbejde det til kżd-og benmel, som derefter for-bržndes eller nedgraves, hvilket uundgeligt vil f konsekvenser for miljżet (2). 
In the short to medium term, the Commission considers the most common way of disposing of this waste will be to convert it into MBM for incineration or landfill, with unavoidable environmental consequences (2).
I EU er der imidlertid ikke umiddelbart kapacitet til forbržnding i s stort omfang. 
However, the incineration capacity required for this is not immediately available in the EU.
Udgifterne til bortskaffelse skżnnes at ville vžre 3 000 millioner euro, og producenterne og udsmeltningsindustrien vil miste yderligere 1 300 millioner euro i indtžgter (fra affaldet) (3). 
The cost of such disposal is estimated to be 3 000 million euro, and another 1 300 million euro will be lost in revenue (from the waste) to producers and the rendering industry (3).
Det midlertidige forbud mod anvendelse af kżd-og benmel i foder til husdyr gżr det nżdvendigt af finde plantebaserede alternativer til forarbejdet animalsk protein til anvendelse i dyrefoder. 
The temporary ban on using MBM in feed for farmed animals, creates a need to find plant-based alternatives to processed animal protein for use in animal feed.
I EU udgjorde animalsk protein Ń hovedsagelig kżd-og benmel Ń kun 2,4 % af proteinindholdet i dyrefoder (4) (men BSE kan spredes, selv om kontamineringen med inficeret kżd-og benmel er minimal Ń jf. punkt 6), og det kan let erstattes med foderaf-grżder, korn og oliefrżprodukter. 
Animal derived proteins Ń mostly MBM Ń provided only 2,4 % of the protein element in animal feed in the EU (4) (and if there is even minimal contamination by infected MBM, then BSE can be spread (see paragraph 6)) and can be readily substituted by forage crops, cereals, and oilseed products.
Et af de aktuelle spżrgsml er nu, om det er rigtigt at give planteždende dyr foder, som indeholder animalsk materiale, og i Kommissionens nylige forslag indgr foranstaltninger, der skal fremme mere ekstensivt landbrug. 
The issue of whether it is appropriate to feed animals which are naturally herbivores with feed which includes animal parts has become more topical, and the CommissionŐs recent proposals include measures to encourage more extensive farming.
Transport og identifikation af dyr 36. 
Animal movement and identification 36.
Der foregr en omfattende transport af dyr og kżdprodukter (herunder kżd-og benmel) inden for og mellem medlemsstaterne. 
The transport of animals and meat products (including MBM) within and between the Member States is significant.
En af konsekvenserne er, at risikoen for spredning af BSE og andre dyresygdomme stiger. 
One of the side effects, however, is that the risk of spreading BSE and other animal diseases is increased by trade.
Ifżlge VSK var det eksporten af inficerede dyr og inficeret foder (fra Det Forenede Kongerige), der bragte BSE-agenset til andre lande, hvor det blev spredt videre gennem foderkžden (5). 
According to the SSC, Ôthe export of infected animals and infected feed (from the United Kingdom) provided the means for the spread of the BSE agent to other countries, where it was again recycled and propagated via the feed chainŐ (5).
BSE-krisen i 1996 understregede behovet for at f indfżrt et effektivt system til identifikation og registrering af kvžg og bragte ogs manglerne i de gžldende systemer til sporing af kvžg, som var udsat for BSE-risiko, frem i lyset. 
The 1996 BSE crisis reinforced the need for an efficient system for bovine identification and registration, and highlighted the deficiencies of the current systems for tracing cattle potentially at risk of BSE.
I april 1997 erstattede Rdet det gžldende direktiv fra 1992 om identifikation og registrering af dyr med en ny forordning (6), som indeholdt žndrede regler for żremžrkning (7) og besžtningsregistre samt nye krav om en elektronisk database (8) og dyrepas. 
In April 1997, the Council replaced the existing 1992 Directive on animal identification and registration with a new Council Regulation (6), which adapted the rules for eartagging (7) and herd registers, and introduced requirements for a computerised database (8) and animal passports.
I december 1997 blev der indfżrt detaljerede regler for kontrolbesżg, hvor det skal efterprżves, om foranstaltningerne gennemfżres korrekt (9). 
Detailed rules for inspections to verify compliance with these measures were introduced in December 1997 (9).
Totalforbuddet mod eksport af levende dyr og kżdprodukter fra Det Forenede Kongerige, som blev indfżrt i marts 1996, blev gradvist ophžvet, s det blev tilladt at eksportere oksekżd 1 () Kommissionens forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rdets forordning om sundhedsbestemmelser for animalske biprodukter, som ikke er 2 bestemt til konsum (KOM(2000) 574 endelig af 19. oktober 2000). () Kommissionens arbejdsdokument SEC(2001) 631 af 10. april 2001. 
The total export ban of March 1996 on live animals and bovine meat or meat products from the United Kingdom was lifted gradually to allow exports of beef produced under restricted 1 () Source: Commission proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption COM(2000) 574 2 final of 19 October 2000. () Source: Commission working document SEC(2001) 631 of 10 April 2001.
I rapporten fra den fżrste samling af den internationale videnskabelige konference om kżd-og benmel, som fandt sted i Bruxelles den 1.-2. juli 1997 under Den Videnskabelige Styringskomits auspicier, blev fżlgende muligheder for bortskaffelse af kżd-og benmel foreslet, hvis det blev forbudt som dyrefoder: tilfżrsel til jorden som gżd-3 ning, forbržnding eller nedgravning. () Kommissionens notat om den żkonomiske effekt af et totalforbud 4 mod kżd-og benmel (udateret). () Kommissionens tjenesters arbejdsdokument ČOffre et demande de plantes riches en proteins dans lŐUE  la suite de la crise de lŐESBÇ (SEC(2001) 431 af 16. marts 2001). 
In addition, the report of the first session of the International Scientific Conference on meat and bonemeal organised under the aegis of the Scientific Steering Committee of the EU, Brussels 1 and 2 July 1997, considered the following options for waste disposal if MBM was banned as animal feed Ń by application to land as fertil-3 ised, by incineration or by landfill. () Source: Commission note on economic impact of a total ban on an-4 imal meal (undated). () Source: document de travail des services de la Commission ÔOffre et demande de plantes riches en proteins dans lŐUE  la suite de la crise de lŐESBŐ SEC(2001) 431 of 16 March 2001.
(5) 6 () 7 () 8 ( ) 9 () Kapitel 2.2 i Den Videnskabelige Styringskomits endelige udtalelse af 6. juli 2000 om den geografiske BSE-risiko. 
(5) 6 () 7 ( ) 8 () 9 () Chapter 2.2 final opinion of 6 July 2000 of the Scientific Steering Committee on the geographical risk of BSE.
820/97 (EFT L 117 af 7.5.1997, s. 
Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 (OJ L 117, 7.5.1997, p.
Denne forordning omhandler svel bestemmelserne vedrżrende IFKS som bestemmelser om mžrkning af oksekżd og oksekżdsprodukter. 
This Regulation deals with the provisions directly applicable to the integrated administration and control system as well as labelling of beef and beef products.
Alle dyr p en bedrift, som er fżdt efter 1. januar 1998, eller som efter 1. januar 1998 er bestemt til handel inden for Fžllesskabet, identificeres ved hjžlp af et żremžrke i hvert żre. 
Eartags are to be applied to each ear to identify all animals on the holding born after 1 January 1998 or intended for intra-Community trade after that date.
Den elektroniske database skulle have vžret fuldt operationel pr. 31. december 1999. 
The computerised database should be fully operational by 31 December 1999.
Rdets direktiv 97/12/EF (EFT L 109 af 25.4.1997, s. 
Council Directive 97/12/EC (OJ L 109, 25.4.1997, p.
1) omhandler veterinžre foranstaltninger i forbindelse med handel inden for Fžllesskabet, men ligesom i Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 820/97 er kravene til den elektroniske database ogs defineret. 
1) concerns veterinary measures for intra-Community trade, but also specifies the requirements for the computerised database as stipulated by Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 (OJ L 117, 7.5.1997 p.
I henhold til direktivets artikel 14 skal databasen indeholde fżlgende oplysninger om hvert dyr: identifikationskode, fżdselsdato, kżn, race eller farve, moderens identifikationskode, identifikationskode for den bedrift, hvor dyret er fżdt, identifikationsnumre for alle de bedrifter, hvor dyret har vžret, datoer for hver enkelt transport, dato for dżd eller slagtning. 
Article 14 of the Directive refers to the information which should be available in the computer system: the identification code, date of birth, sex, breed or colour of coat, ID code of the mother cow (dam), the ID number of the holdings where born, ID numbers of all holdings where the animal has been kept, the dates of each change of holding, date of death or slaughter.
Hvis disse krav overholdes, kan man finde fuldstžndig dokumentation om alle kreaturer i databasen. 
If these requirements are respected the database could provide complete documentation on each bovine animal.
2630/97 (EFT L 354 af 30.12.1997, s. 
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2630/97 (OJ L 354, 30.12.1997, p.
I risikoanalysen skal der tages hensyn til antallet af dyr p bedriften, folke-og dyresundhedsforhold og tidligere sygdomsudbrud, det belżb, som bedriften gżr krav p og/eller fr udbetalt i oksekżdspržmier, sammenholdt med det belżb, der blev udbetalt det foregende r, andre vžsentlige žndringer og resultaterne af tidligere rs kontrol (f.eks. om besžtningsregistrene har vžret fżrt korrekt, og om passene har vžret i orden). 
The risk analysis must take into account the number of animals on the holdings; public and animal health considerations and any previous existence or outbreak of disease, the amount of bovine premium claimed/paid in comparison to previous years, other significant changes and the results of checks conducted in earlier years (e.g. the proper keeping of holding register and passports).
C 324/16 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 20.11.2001 fremstillet under sžrlige forhold (1). 
C 324/16 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20.11.2001 conditions (1).
Forbuddet blev ophžvet for Nordirland pr. 1. juni 1998 og for Storbritannien pr. 
The ban in Northern Ireland was lifted as of 1 June 1998 and for mainland Britain from 1 August 1999.
Den Stende Veterinžrkomit besluttede i marts 2001, at det eksportforbud, som blev plagt Portugal i november 1998 (2), kunne ophžves, men at der ikke kunne fastsžttes en dato, fżr der forel en positiv inspektionsrapport fra Levnedsmiddel-og Vete-rinžrkontoret. 
The Standing Veterinary Committee decided in March 2001 that the export ban of November 1998 on Portugal (2) could be lifted, but that the date would depend on a positive inspection report by the FVO.
Retten konstaterede i sžrberetning nr. 4/2001 (3) om det integrerede forvaltnings-og kontrolsystem, at selv om fristen for oprettelse af den elektroniske database til identifikation og registrering af kvžg var 1. januar 2000, var databaserne i otte medlemsstater ikke anerkendt af Kommissionens tjenester som fuldt operationelle (4); og desuden var der svagheder ved anerkendelses-og kontrolprocedurerne, og databaserne var ikke fuldstžndige. 
The CourtŐs Special Report No 4/2001 (3) on the integrated administration and control system found that although the deadline for implementation of the computerised database was 1 January 2000, eight Member States had databases which had not been approved by the Commission services as fully operational (4); and that there were weaknesses in the approval, monitoring, and content of bovine identification and registration databases.
Bde Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret under Generaldirektoratet for Sundhed og Forbrugerbeskyttelse og Generaldirektoratet for Landbrugs afdeling for regnskabsafslutning beretter om forsinkelser og problemer i forbindelse med medlemsstaternes gennemfżrelse af lovgivningen om identifikation og registrering af dyr. 
Inspections carried out by both the FVO of DG SANCO and by the Clearance of Accounts unit of DG AGRI, consistently report delays and problems with the implementation of the animal identification and registration legislation by Member States.
Tilsyn og hndhžvelse Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontorets inspektioner 40. 
Monitoring and enforcement Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) inspections 40.
Efter omorganiseringen af Kommissionens tjenester er Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontorets arbejdsmetoder blevet forbedret, og der er udarbejdet et workflowprogram. 
Since the reorganisation of the Commission services, the working methods of the FVO have been improved, and a work flow programme has been developed.
Der udarbejdes rs-og halvrsprogrammer, og rapporterne er nu bedre opbygget. 
There is sixĐmonthly and annual planning, and reports are better structured, giving clear conclusions and recommendations to the Member States and to other Commission services.
Alle resultater og anbefalinger indlžses i en database. 
A record of all findings and recommendations is maintained in a database.
Selv om antallet af ansatte er steget, er der ikke personale nok til at foretage BSE-inspektionerne. 
Although staff numbers have been increased, there are not enough staff to carry out the BSE inspections.
Den gruppe, der (blandt andet) tager sig af BSE-sager, bestr normalt af seks inspektżrer, og den er blevet forstžrket med yderligere seks inspektżrer. 
The team that deals with BSE related matters (amongst other issues) normally consists of six inspectors, and has currently been reinforced by another six inspectors.
Personaleomsžtningen er hżj Ń i januar 2001 havde 65 % af kontorets inspektżrer vžret ansat i under to r, hvilket gjorde det vanskeligt for kontoret at tilrettelžgge inspektionerne, s de alle blev ledet af tilstržkkeligt erfarne inspektżrer. 
Staff turnover is high Ń 65 % of the FVO inspectors in January 2001 had been there for less than two years, making it difficult for the FVO to have sufficiently experienced inspection team leaders.
Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret foretog 96 BSE-relaterede inspektioner (5) fra krisens udbrud i 1996 til udgangen af 2000. 
The FVO carried out 96 BSE-related inspections (5) between the crisis of 1996 and the end of 2000.
10 % af kontorets samlede inspektioner og gennemsnitligt n BSE-relateret inspektion om ret i hver medlemsstat (bortset fra Det Forenede Kongerige, hvor inspektionerne var hyppigere). 
This represents about 10 % of total FVO inspection activity, and an average of one BSE-related inspection per year to each Member State (apart from the United Kingdom, which was inspected more frequently).
Vurdering af medlemsstaternes gennemfżrelse af BSE-strategien 43. 
Assessment of implementation of BSE strategy by Member States 43.
Siden 1996 har Kommissionen gennem Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontorets inspektionsrapporter berettet om udbredte og vedvarende problemer med gennemfżrelsen af BSE-foranstaltningerne i alle medlemsstaterne. 
The Commission (FVO) inspections since 1996 have reported widespread and continuing problems with the implementation of the BSE measures in all the Member States.
De vžsentligste problemer er omtalt i punkt 21-39. 
The main problems found are referred to in paragraphs 21 to 39.
Bilag 2 er en oversigt over de forhold, som Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret rapporterede fra 1998 til 2000, og figur 6 viser de vžsentlige svagheder, som Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret konstaterede fra 1998 til 2000. 
See Annex 2 for an overview of issues reported by the FVO between 1998 and 2000, and Figure 6 for an indication of the main weaknesses identified by the FVO between 1998 and 2000.
Den kendsgerning, at mange af problemerne blev omtalt gentagne gange i inspektionsrapporter mellem 1998 og 2000, tyder p, at de fleste medlemsstater (6) ikke har fżrt tilstržkkelig streng kontrol med, at BSE-foranstaltningerne blev gennemfżrt, som de skulle. 
The fact that many of the problems continued to be reported in inspections from 1998 to 2000, suggests that most Member States (6) have not been rigorous enough in ensuring that BSE measures have been adequately implemented in their territories.
Foranstaltninger til hndhžvelse af EUŐs BSE-strategi 44. 
Measures available for enforcement of the EUŐs BSE strategy 44.
Nr Levnedsmiddel-og Veterinžrkontoret ppeger bestemte problemer i en inspektionsrapport, kan Kommissionen indlede bilaterale drżftelser med de berżrte medlemsstater og p grundlag af lovgivningen for det indre marked indfżre handelsforbud for at beskytte menneskers og dyrs sundhed. 
Where an FVO inspection highlights problems, the Commission can undertake bilateral discussions with the Member States concerned and use single market legislation to impose trade bans to protect human or animal health.
Men den eneste konkrete mde, hvorp Kommissionen kan hndhžve den relevante lovgivning (for eksempel vedrżrende kontrol af dyrefoder), er ved at indlede overtrždelsesprocedurer. 
But the only concrete measure open to the Commission to enforce the application of relevant legislation (for example, the control of animal feed) is to institute infringement procedures.
Det tager meget lang tid at gennemfżre disse procedurer, og i de fleste tilfžlde er man ikke net s langt som til at indbringe sagerne for EF-Domstolen (jf. punkt 46). 
These procedures are slow and to date, most cases have not been taken forward to the European Court of Justice (see paragraph 46).
Kun nr det vurderes, at der er stor fare for menneskers eller dyrs sundhed, indfżres der handelsforbud, sdan som det var tilfžldet med Det Forenede Kongerige og Portugal. 
Only in cases of perceived high risk to human or animal health are trade bans on exports used, as was the case for the United Kingdom and Portugal.