natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(1) Danmark, Det Forenede Kongerige (England og Wales), Frankrig, Italien, Nederlandene og Spanien. 28.12.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende Ń Fžllesskabslovgiver bżr angive nžrmere i forordningerne de forskellige elementer, der er afgżrende for et effektivt inspektions-og sanktionssystem. 
28.12.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union Ń the Community legislator should specify in the regulations the various elements essential to an effective inspection and sanction system, Ń the Community legislator should reinforce the CommissionŐs ability to put pressure on defaulting Member States, Ń the Commission and Member States should adopt active measures to reduce structural overcapacity in the fishing industry.
C 317/5 INDLEDNING Ml for og vigtigste karakteristikker af forvaltningen af Fžllesskabets fiskeressourcer 1. 
C 317/5 INTRODUCTION Objective and main characteristics of the management of the Community fisheries resources 1.
Hvert r landes der over 4,4 millioner tons fisk og skaldyr til en samlet vžrdi af 6 100 millioner euro i EF-havne (1). 
Each year more than 4,4 million tonnes of fish and crustaceans with a total value of EUR 6 100 million are landed in Community ports (1).
Fiske-industrien beskžftiger 230 000 personer i Den Europžiske Union (EU), og erhvervet spiller en afgżrende rolle i visse kystomrder, hvor det vanskeligt kan erstattes af andre erhverv. 
The fishing industry accounts for 230 000 jobs in the European Union (EU) and in certain coastal regions plays a major role for which there is no easy substitute.
Fžllesskabets fiskeressourcer (2) er en del af de fžlles rig-domskilder. 
The Community fishery resources (2) are part of our common heritage.
Mlet for den fžlles fiskeripolitik er at sikre Čat de levende akvatiske ressourcer udnyttes p en żkonomisk, miljżmžssigt og socialt bžredygtig mdeÇ (3). 
The objective of the common fisheries policy (CFP) is to Ôensure exploitation of living aquatic resources that provides sustainable economic, environmental and social conditionsŐ (3).
Iden om et bžredygtigt fiskeri fandtes allerede, da fiskeripolitikken blev indledt i 1983 (4), selv om den dengang blev formuleret anderledes. 
Even though the formulation was different, the concept of sustainable fishing has existed since the CFP was instituted in 1983 (4).
Nžsten 20 r efter har Kommissionen gjort status over den fžlles fiskeripolitik. Den m konstatere, at resultatet er negativt, og erkende, at politikken Čikke har fżrt til nogen bžredygtig udnyttelse af fiskeressourcerneÇ (5). 
Almost twenty years later the Commission could not avoid a negative assessment of the CFP, recognising that the policy had not attained its target and had Ônot delivered sustainable exploitation of fisheries resourcesŐ (5).
Kommissionen pržciserede, at politikken er slet fejl, svel for s vidt angr miljżet: ČMange fiskebestande [befinder] sig i dag langt uden for sikre biologiske gržnserÇ, som p det żkonomiske og sociale plan: ČFiskerisekto-ren er żkonomisk skrżbelig som fżlge af overinvestering, hurtigt stigende omkostninger og vigende fiskeressourcer. Dette afspejler sig i ringe rentabilitet og en stadigt faldende beskžftigelseÇ. 
It stated that the failure was environmental, Ômany stocks are at present outside safe biological limitsŐ, as well as economic and social, Ôthe fisheries sector is characterised by economic fragility resulting from over-investment, rapidly rising costs and a shrinking resource base: this is reflected in poor profitability and steadily declining employmentŐ.
(1) Kilde: Eurostat: ČFakta og nżgletal om den fžlles fiskeripolitikÇ, udgave 2006. 
(1) Source: Eurostat, Facts and figures on the FCP, 2006 edition.
(2) I henhold til international ret har kyststaterne suveržne rettigheder over alle naturressourcer i deres Čeksklusive żkonomiske zoneÇ (EŻZ), dvs. i alle de farvande, der ligger inden for en afstand af 200 sżmil fra deres kyster. 
(2) Underinternationallawcoastalstateshavesovereignrightstoallnatu-ral resources in their Ôexclusive economic zoneŐ (EEZ), i.e. in the waters inside a 200 nautical mile limit of their shores.
I Middelhavet findes der dog ingen EŻZ, og kun territo-rialfarvandene, dvs. en zone p 12 sżmil fra kysten er under national suveržnitet. 
In the Mediterranean, however, there are no exclusive economic zones and the waters under national sovereignty are limited to the territorial sea, i.e. the 12 nautical mile zone.
P fžllesskabsniveau er forvaltningen af fiskeressourcerne i hver enkelt medlemsstats territorialfarvande eller EŻZ udelukkende Den Europžiske Unions ansvar. 
At Community level management of the fishery resources contained within each Member StateŐs territorial waters or EEZ is the exclusive responsibility of the European Union.
Uden for disse farvande forvaltes ressourcerne gennem internationale aftaler. 
Resources outside these waters are governed by international agreements.
2371/2002 af 20.12.2002 om bevarelse og bžredygtig udnyttelse af fiskeressourcerne som led i den fžlles fiskeripolitik, artikel 2, stk. 1 (EFT L 358 af 31.12.2002, s. 
(3) Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy, Article 2(1) (OJ L 358, 31.12.2002).
170/83 af 25.1.1983 om en fžllesskabs-ordning for bevarelse og forvaltning af fiskeressourcerne, artikel 1 (EFT L 24 af 27.1.1983, s. 1). 
(4) Council Regulation (EEC) No 170/83 of 25 January 1983 establishing a Community system for the conservation and management of fishery resources, Article 1 (OJ L 24, 27.1.1983).
(5) Grżnbog om den fžlles fiskeripolitiks fremtid (KOM(2001) 135 endelig af 20.3.2001). 
(5) Green paper on the future of the common fisheries policy, COM(2001) 135 final, 20.3.2001.
Denne diagnose bekržftes af de seneste disponible data. 
This diagnosis is confirmed by the latest figures available.
Forskere fra Det Internationale Havundersżgelsesrd (ICES), der foretager biologiske vurderinger, har analyseret udnyttelsesgraden for en ržkke bestande i det nordżstlige Atlanterhav, der er det omrde, hvor stżrsteparten af EF-fiskeressourcerne er koncentreret (6). 
Scientists at the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), which is responsible for biological appraisal, have studied the exploitation rate for a number of stocks in the north-eastern Atlantic, the area where most of the Community fisheries resources are concentrated (6).
Det fremgr heraf, at 81 % af bestandene overfiskes (7). 
Their work showed that 81 % of the stocks evaluated were over-exploited (7).
Fra et żkonomisk synspunkt understreger Eurostats tal den diagnose, at politikken er forfejlet, idet de viser den fortsatte nedgang i EF-fangstmžngden i det nordżstlige Atlanterhav. 
From the economic viewpoint, the diagnosis of failure is supported by the Eurostat figures which showed a steady decrease in the volume of Community catches in the north-eastern Atlantic.
I perioden 1995-2005 var denne nedgang p i alt 30 %. 
Over the period 1995-2005 the overall decrease was 30 %.
P verdenstopmżdet om bžredygtig udvikling i Johannesburg i 2002 undertegnede Den Europžiske Union en handlingsplan, hvor et af mlene er at genoprette fiskebestande til niveauer, som kan yde det maksimale bžredygtige udbytte, ikke senere end i 2015. 
Moreover at the Johannesburg Earth Summit on sustainable development in 2002 the European Union subscribed to an action plan whose objectives included restoring all fish stocks to levels that can produce the maximum sustainable yield by 2015 at the latest.
Vigtigste politikker og foranstaltninger 6. 
Main policies and measures 6.
Fisk er en fornyelig naturressource, der er vanskelig at opgżre, og hvor faktorer som f.eks. reproduktion og migration ikke kan styres direkte. 
Fish is a renewable natural resource that is not easily quantifiable, and the reproduction and movement factors are not directly controllable.
I den forbindelse spiller aktiviteten Čbevarelse, kontrol og hndhžvelseÇ en central rolle, fordi den har til forml dels at definere ordninger for bevarelse og forvaltning af ressourcerne, dels at sikre, at bestemmelserne anvendes korrekt. 
Catch limitation is therefore the only way of influencing stocks and Ôconservation, control and enforcementŐ activity thus plays a key role in that its aim is, firstly, to define the arrangements for conserving and managing resources and, secondly, to ensure that the corresponding regulations are properly implemented.
I Den Europžiske Union er den vigtigste foranstaltning til forvaltning af ressourcen begržnsning af fangstmžngden ved fastsžttelse af en samlet tilladt fangstmžngde (TAC) for de vigtigste fiskearter, der fordeles mellem de forskellige medlemsstater i form af kvoter. 
The European UnionŐs main resource management measure is limiting catch volumes by setting total allowable catches (TAC) for the main species and dividing them between the various Member States in the form of quotas.
TAC vedtages hvert r af Rdet p forslag af Kommissionen, og disse forslag bygger p videnskabelige udtalelser (8). 
The TAC are adopted annually by the Council on the basis of Commission proposals which, in turn, are based on scientific opinions (8).
I disse udtalelser angives de mžnger fisk, som kan fanges (6) I 2005 blev 76 % af de 5,6 millioner tons fisk, der blev fanget af EF-flden i alle egne af verden, fanget i det nordżstlige Atlanterhav. 
The latter (6) In 2005 the north-eastern Atlantic accounted for 76 % of the 5,6 million tonnes caught in all regions of the world by the Community fleet.
Kilde: Eurostat, statistiques en bref 10/2007 af 15.1.2007. 
Source: Eurostat, Statistics in focus 10/2007, 15.1.2007.
(7) Kommissionen, Memo/06/268 af 5.7.2006. 
(7) Commission, Memo/06/268, 5 July 2006.
(8) Videnskabelige udtalelser fra Det Internationale Havundersżgelsesrd (ICES), som Kommissionen forelžgger for Den Videnskabelige, Tekniske og Żkonomiske Komit for Fiskeri (STECF), der bestr af nationale eksperter, repržsentanter for fiskerisektoren og andre involverede, f.eks. ngoŐer, der beskžftiger sig med miljżbeskyttelse. C 317/6 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 28.12.2007 uden at bringe bestandenes fornyelse i fare. 
(8) Scientific opinions delivered by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), and submitted by the Commission to the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), comprising national experts, representatives of the fisheries sector and other stakeholders, including environmental NGOs. C 317/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 28.12.2007 provide an indication of the quantity of fish that can be taken without jeopardising the renewal of stocks.
Forskerne bruger data fra deres egne undersżgelser, men de bruger ogs de data om fangstmžngder, som fiskerne har anmeldt. 
The data used by the scientists are the results of their own work, together with the catch quantities declared by the fishing industry.
Tidligere blev begržnsningen af tilladte fangster ledsaget af en politik for obligatorisk reduktion af fiskerikapaciteten. 
In the past, limitation of authorised catches was accompanied by a compulsory policy of reducing fishing fleet capacity.
I dag nżjes fžllesskabsforanstaltningerne med at lžgge loft over kapaciteterne og fokusere p fiskeriindsatsen, dvs. fiskerfldens aktivitet. 
TodayŐs Community measures simply set an upper limit on capacity and influence the fishing effort, i.e. the activity of the fishing fleet.
De bestr navnlig i bestemmelser for fiskeredskaber og/eller fastsžtter mindsteml for visse fiskearter. 
Basically, these ÔmeasuresŐ specify the characteristics of fishing gear and/or set minimum sizes for particular species.
De forskellige politikker fastsžttes p fžllesskabsniveau, men det er medlemsstaterne (1), der har det overordnede ansvar for, at der foretages effektiv kontrol og inspektion, og for, at reglerne i den fžlles fiskeripolitik hndhžves effektivt (2). 
Although the various policies are defined at Community level, it is the Member States (1) who have general responsibility for ensuring effective control, inspection and enforcement of the CFP rules (2).
Det str dem helt frit, hvordan de vil forvalte deres kvoter og organisere inspektioner, og hvilke sanktioner de vil plžgge ved overtrždelser. 
This means they have total freedom with regard to arrangements for administering their quotas, organising inspections and the nature of sanctions to be applied in cases of infringement.
Kommissionen har til gengžld ansvaret for at evaluere og kontrollere, hvordan medlemsstaterne anvender bestemmelserne om den fžlles fiskeripolitik, og for at lette koordineringen og samarbejdet medlemsstaterne imellem. 
For its part, the Commission is responsible for evaluating and controlling the application of CFP rules by the Member States and for facilitating coordination and cooperation between them.
Finansiel betydning 10. 
Volume of finance involved 10.
Hvis man udelukkende ser p de direkte tildelte bevillinger (3), er Fžllesskabets bidrag til aktiviteten Čkontrol og hndhžvelseÇ kun p 46 millioner euro. 
The Community contribution to Ôcontrol and enforcementŐ activity is limited to 46 million euro if only the appropriations directly allocated (3) to it are considered.
Men der er tale om et langt stżrre belżb, hvis man tager de samlede aktiviteter i betragtning, der har til forml i det mindste til dels at behandle konsekvenserne af, at ressourceforvaltningspolitikken er slet fejl, navnlig strukturstżt-ten til fiskeri (837 millioner euro) og de internationale fiskeriaftaler (156 millioner euro). 
The financial issues are far more substantial if one takes into account all the activities designed to deal, if only partially, with the consequences of the serious shortcomings of the resource management policy, especially the structural assistance for fisheries (837 million euro) and the international fisheries agreements (156 million euro).
Fiskeressourcen er endvidere et aktiv, der direkte vedrżrer Den Europžiske Union, eftersom Den Europžiske Union er ansvarlig for forvaltningen. 
Moreover fish stocks are an asset which is the direct concern of the European Union in that the EU is responsible for managing them.
De vanskeligheder, der er forbundet med at gżre dette aktiv op i penge, bżr ikke slżre, hvor reelt og hvor vigtigt aktivet er. 
The difficulties of evaluating that asset in monetary terms must not obscure the reality and significance of it.
(1) Den enkelte medlemsstat kontrollerer de aktiviteter, der udżves p dens omrde eller i farvande under dens hżjhedsomrde eller jurisdik-tion. 
(1) Each Member State controls the activities carried out in its territory or in waters under its sovereignty or jurisdiction.
(2) Forordning (EF) nr. 2371/2002, artikel 23, stk. 
(2) Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, Article 23(1).
(3) Alle tal vedrżrende bevillingerne er 2007-betalingsbevillinger. 
(3) All figures relating to appropriations are 2007 payment appropriations.
Vigtigste forordninger 12. 
Main regulations 12.
Grundforordningen er Rdets forordning om bevarelse og bžredygtig udnyttelse af fiskeressourcerne som led i den fžlles fiskeripolitik (4). 
The base regulation is the Council Regulation on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy (4).
Mlene og Fžllesskabets forskellige aktionsmidler til at n disse ml defineres i forordningens kapitel V. 13. 
Chapter V specifies the objectives and the different Community means of action for achieving them. 13.
Bestemmelserne om kontrolsystemet (5) og om indsamling af fangstdata (6) er nedfžldet i žldre, specifikke forordninger. 
The provisions on the control system (5), on the one hand, and the collection of catch data (6), on the other hand, form part of older specific regulations.
Andre forpligtelser p kontrolomrdet er medtaget i bilaget til de rlige forordninger kaldet ČTAC og kvoterÇ (7) og i forordningerne om indfżrelse af foranstaltninger til genopretning eller om en flerrig plan for bžredygtig udnyttelse af specifikke fiskearter (8). 
Other obligations relating to control are included in annexes to the annual ÔTAC and quotaŐ regulations (7) and in the regulations establishing recovery measures or multiannual plans for the sustainable exploitation of specific stocks (8). AUDIT CHARACTERISTICS Audit subject and questions 14.
BESKRIVELSE AF REVISIONEN Revisionsemne og -spżrgsml 14. Begržnsning af fangstmžngderne ved fastsžttelse af TAC og kvoter er hjżrnestenen i den fžlles politik for forvaltning af fiskeressourcerne. 
Limitation of catch volumes, by setting TAC and quotas, is the cornerstone of the Community policy for the management of the fisheries resources.
For at der kan opns et positivt resultat med en sdan metode, er det nżdvendigt, at der findes plidelige og fuldstžndige data, og at der indfżres effektive inspektions-og sanktionssystemer. 
The existence of complete and reliable data and the application of effective inspection and penalty systems are essential to the success of such an approach.
Retten har derfor fundet det hensigtsmžssigt at gennemfżre en revision for at besvare fżlgende spżrgsml: ČUdfżrer Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne de handlinger, der er nżdvendige for et effektivt kontrol-, inspektions-og sanktionssystem med henblik p bevarelse af fiskeressourcerne?Ç (4) Forordning (EF) nr. 2371/2002. (5) Rdets forordning (EŻF) nr. 
The Court therefore deemed it appropriate to perform an audit that aimed to answer the following question: ÔAre the Commission and the Member States taking the necessary steps for an effective system of control, inspection and sanctions for the conservation of fisheries resources?Ő (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002.
2847/93 af 12.10.1993 om indfżrelse af en kontrolordning under den fžlles fiskeripolitik (EFT L 261 af 20.10.1993, s. 1). 
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (OJ L 261, 20.10.1993).
2807/83 af 22.9.1983 om nžrmere bestemmelser for registrering af oplysninger om medlemsstaternes fangster (EFT L 276 af 10.10.1983, s. 1). 
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2807/83 of 22 September 1983 laying down detailed rules for recording information on Member StatesŐ catches of fish (OJ L 276, 10.10.1983).
(7) Rdetsforordning(EF)nr.27/2005af22.12.2004omfastsžttelsefor 2005 af fiskerimuligheder og dertil knyttede betingelser for visse fiskebestande og grupper af fiskebestande gžldende for EF-farvande og for EF-fartżjer i andre farvande, som er omfattet af fangstbegržnsninger (EUT L 12 af 14.1.2005, s. 
CouncilRegulation(EC)No27/2005of22December2004fixingfor 2005 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required (OJ L 12, 14.1.2005).
28.12.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 317/7 Fire specifikke revisionsml er blevet undersżgt: a) Er fangstdataene plidelige, og fżlges der effektivt op p dem? (Retten skal ikke udtale sig om kvaliteten af de enkelte opgżrelser) b) Er inspektionssystemerne s effektive som muligt? c) Er systemerne til opfżlgning af overtrždelser tilpassede og effektive? d) Hvad gżres der konkret ved den iboende risiko, som fiskerfldens overskydende kapacitet udgżr? 
28.12.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 317/7 Four specific audit objectives were investigated: (a) Are catch data reliable and monitored effectively? (without stating an opinion as to the quality of individual declarations) (b) Are the inspection systems as effective as possible? (c) Are the systems for following up infringements appropriate and effective? (d) How far is the inherent risk constituted by overcapacity in the fishing industry dealt with in reality?
Revisionsstrategi og -metode 15. 
Audit approach and methodology 15.
Revisionsarbejdet gik navnlig ud p at analysere systemerne til indsamling af data, inspektionssystemerne og sanktionssystemerne centralt i Kommissionen og i medlemsstaterne. 
The audit work focused mainly on analysis of data collection, inspection and sanction systems, and was carried out at Commission headquarters and in the Member States.
Beviserne blev indsamlet og undersżgt gennem interview og analyse af dokumenter og data. 
Audit evidence was collected and examined by means of interviews and analysis of documents and data.
Revisorerne gennemfżrte en ržkke kontroltest for at supplere, teste og validere deres kendskab til systemet. Kontroltestene vedrżrte registreringen af fangsterne og inspektionsrapporterne. 
In order to supplement, test and cross-check their knowledge of the system the auditors carried out a series of tests of control on catch records, on the one hand, and inspection reports on the other.
Da der mangler specifik lovgivning, var de valgte kriterier de vigtigste generelle standarder p omrdet, som anerkendes af internationale organisationer (1). 
In the absence of specific regulatory requirements the criteria adopted were the standards recognised by international organisations and generally applicable to this area (1).
De seks reviderede medlemsstater blev udvalgt p grund af deres fangstmžngder og vžrdien af landingerne. 
The basis on which these six Member States were selected for the audit was the size of catch volumes and the value of their landings.
Det drejer sig om Danmark, Det Forenede Kongerige, Frankrig, Italien, Nederlandene og Spanien, der tilsammen tegner sig for ca. 70 % af fangstmžngden og over 80 % af vžrdien af de landede fisk (2). 
The Member States in question were Denmark, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, which together account for almost 70 % of catch volumes and more than 80 % of the value of landings (2).
Der blev aflagt revisionsbesżg i perioden april-november 2006. 
On-the-spot visits took place between April and November 2006.
Denne beretning offentliggżres nžsten fem r efter offentliggżrelsen af den seneste generelle forordning om den fžlles fiskeripolitik, p et tidspunkt, hvor Kommissionen forbereder en omarbejdelse af ČkontrolforordningenÇ med henblik p at forelžgge et forslag til forordning for Rdet i 2008. 
This report is being published almost five years after the publication of the last general regulation on the CFP, at a time when the Commission is preparing to begin the recasting of the ÔcontrolŐ regulation with a view to presenting the text of a proposal to the Council in 2008.
(1) Kilderne til sdanne standarder var: generelle kriterier for forskellige organisationer, der foretager inspektion (ISO/IEC 17 020:1998), COSO Enterprise Risk Management integrated framework (2004), en undersżgelse af forvaltningen af fiskeressourcer fra Riksrevisjonen i Norge, Udtalelse fra Revisionsretten om indfżrelse af Čn enkelt revi-sionsmodelÇ (EUT C 107 af 30.4.2004, s. 1), KOM(2003) 130 endelig: Meddelelse fra Kommissionen til Rdet og Europa-Parlamentet Ń Vejen til en ensartet og effektiv gennemfżrelse af den fžlles fiskeripolitik, Kommissionens standarder for intern kontrol: standard 11: ČRisi-koanalyse og -styringÇ, standard 17: ČOvervgningÇ, standard 7: ČMlfastsžttelseÇ, standard 10: ČResultatkontrolÇ og standard 9: ČDen rlige forvaltningsplanÇ. 
(1) The sources of such standards were: General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection (ISO/IEC 17 020: 1998); COSO Enterprise Risk Management Ń integrated framework (2004); Office of the Auditor General Norway ÔStudy on the management of the fisheries resourcesŐ; ECA Opinion on the single audit model (OJ C 107, 30.4.2004); COM(2003)130 final: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament Ń Towards uniform and effective implementation of the CFP; EU Commission Internal Control Standards numbers 11, Risk analysis and management, 17, Supervision, 7, Objective setting, 10, Monitoring performance and 9, Annual management plan.
(2) Fangsttal for 2003 og tal vedrżrende landinger for 2002 offentliggjort af Eurostat. 
(2) 2003 catch figures and 2002 landing figures published by Eurostat.
BEMŽRKNINGER Usikre data om kvoteudnyttelsen og utilstržkkelig overvgning 18. 
OBSERVATIONS Quota uptake data unreliable and monitoring rudimentary 18.