natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Markedskržfterne sžtter alle producenter under pres med hensyn til at opfylde hżjere mil-jżstandarder, forbedre produktkvaliteten og begržnse omkostningerne. 
Market forces put pressure on all producers to meet higher environmental standards, improve product quality and control costs.
Selv om der ydes EU-stżtte til medlemmer af producentorganisationer, vžlger flertallet af producenterne i de stżrste frugt-og grżntsagsproducerende medlemsstater ikke at tilslutte sig en producentorganisation. 
Despite the availability of EU aids to members of producer organisations, the majority of growers in the main fruit and vegetable producing Member States choose not to participate.
I de fleste medlemsstater er det endnu ikke lykkedes at koncentrere udbuddet. 
The policy has so far not succeeded in concentrating supply in most Member States.
Da Retten rapporterede om frugt-og grżntsagssektoren i 2000, blev ca. 40 % af EUŐs frugt-og grżntsagsproduktion markedsfżrt af producentorganisationer. 
When the Court reported on the fruit and vegetable sector in 2000, around 40 % of the EUŐs fruit and vegetable production was marketed by producer organisations.
Ifżlge Kommissionens seneste data er dette tal faldet til omkring en tredjedel. 
The CommissionŐs latest data shows that this has fallen to about one-third.
Kommissionen har ikke vurderet rsagerne til den manglende deltagelse i producentorganisationer, herunder om medlemsstaternes procedurer har vžret gode nok til at sikre, at midlerne til udvikling af landdistrikterne ikke har undermineret producenternes incitament til at deltage. 
The Commission has not assessed the reasons for this lack of participation in producer organisations, including whether Member StatesŐ procedures have been sufficient to ensure that Rural Development funding has not undermined the incentive for growers to join.
ANBEFALINGER 94. 
RECOMMENDATIONS 94.
Det fremgr af konklusionerne, at det generelle politikml, nemlig at koncentrere udbuddet i producentorganisationer, i de fleste medlemsstater ikke er blevet opfyldt, og at Kommissionen mangler de oplysninger om rsagerne hertil, der ville vžre nżdvendige for at kunne tage politikken op til revision. 
The conclusions presented above show that the overall policy objective of concentrating supply in producer organisations has not been achieved in most Member States, and the Commission lacks the information on the reasons for this that would be necessary for reviewing the policy.
Indtil der er foretaget en sdan revision, som bżr tage hensyn til resultaterne af den evaluering af producentorganisationerne, der skal foreligge i 2009, bżr Kommissionen fremsžtte forslag til at gżre ordningen for stżtte til driftsprogrammer enklere og mere effektiv. 
Pending a review of this, which should take account of the results of the evaluation of producer organisations due in 2009, the Commission should bring forward proposals to make the aid scheme for operational programmes simpler and more effective.
Stżtten til driftsprogrammer bżr gżres enklere og mere effektiv 95. 
Make the aid for operational programmes simpler and more effective 95.
For at forbedre ordningen med stżtte til driftsprogrammer bżr Kommissionen overveje, om man med fordel kunne anvende fżlgende alternative metoder: i) forenkle og reducere omkostningerne ved ordningen ved at gżre kriterierne for stżtteberettigede omkostninger klarere, og ved at fjerne programmeringskravene ii) forenkle stżtteordningen og forbedre dens effektivitet ved at tage de ml, der er fastsat for driftsprogrammerne, og stżtteberettigelseslisterne op til fornyet overvejelse, sledes at medlemsstaterne opmuntres til at anvende effektivitetskrite-rier ved godkendelsen af driftsprogrammer iii) forbedre sammenhžngen, forenkle administrationen og reducere omkostningerne ved at rette ordningens procedurer og regler for udgifternes stżtteberettigelse ind efter de regler, der gžlder for investeringsforanstaltninger til udvikling af landdistrikter. 
The Commission should consider the merits of the following alternative approaches to improve the operational programme aid scheme: (i) simplify and reduce the costs of the scheme by clarifying the criteria for eligible expenditure and removing the programming requirements; (ii) simplify and improve the effectiveness of the aid by reviewing the objectives set for operational programmes and the eligibility lists to encourage Member States to approve operational programmes based on effectiveness criteria; (iii) improvecoherence,simplifyadministrationandreducecosts by aligning the schemeŐs procedures and rules for the eligibility of expenditure with those of the Rural Development investment measures.
Kommissionen bżr forbedre sin indsamling af data om driftsprogrammerne og producentorganisationerne og fokusere p nogle f centrale indikatorer, som vil gżre det muligt for den at overvge stżtteordningens effektivitet og give nyttige oplysninger med henblik p periodisk evaluering. 
The Commission should improve its data collection on operational programmes and producer organisations, focusing on a few key indicators that will allow it to monitor the effectiveness of the aid scheme and provide useful information for periodic evaluation.
20.11.2006 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 282/51 Politikken bżr gżres mere mlrettet for at n de generelle ml om koncentration og tilpasning 97. 
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/51 Better target the policy to achieve the overall objectives of concentration and adaptation 97.
Kommissionen bżr bruge den evaluering, som er planlagt i 2009, til at f en bedre forstelse af rsagerne til, at der ikke er sket fremskridt med hensyn til koncentration af udbuddet i producentorganisationer. 
The Commission should use the evaluation planned for 2009 to obtain a better understanding of the reasons for the lack of progress in the concentration of supply in producer organisations.
Den bżr vurdere, om producentorganisationerne har forbedret situationen for deres medlemmer i forhold til andre producenter, og hvordan politikken fungerer sammen med politikken for udvikling af landdistrikter. 
It should assess whether producer organisations have improved the situation of their members in relation to other growers, and how the policy coexists with rural development.
Hvis disse undersżgelser bekržfter, at producentorganisationer er en effektiv mekanisme, der kan styrke producenternes stilling, bżr politikken gżres mere mlrettet med henblik herp. 
If these studies confirm that producer organisations are an effective mechanism for strengthening the position of growers, the policy should be better targeted to achieve this.
Kommissionen bżr foresl žndringer, som opmuntrer producenterne til at tilslutte sig en producentorganisation, navnlig i de medlemsstater, der har den stżrste produktion af frugt og grżntsager. 
The Commission should propose changes to encourage membership of producer organisations, particularly in the main fruit and vegetable producing Member States.
Kommissionen bżr ogs overveje, om politikkens ml om at tilpasse produktionen til den žndrede efterspżrgsel nemmere ville kunne ns, hvis der ud over omsžtningen, som er grundlaget for at yde stżtte til producentorganisationerne, ogs blev anvendt andre kriterier, s man sikrede, at stżtten kom de producenter til gode, som har stżrst behov for at tilpasse sig. 
The Commission should also consider if the policy aim of adapting production to the changing market demands could be better achieved if the aid was targeted at those who have the most need of adaptation by introducing new criteria, in addition to turnover, for allocating funding to producer organisations.
Der bżr sžttes spżrgsmlstegn ved den politik, der gr ud p at opmuntre til dannelse af producentorganisationer 99. 
Question the policy of encouraging producer organisations 99.
Kommissionen bżr ogs bruge den planlagte evaluering til at vurdere, om fordelene ved den koncentration af udbuddet, der er opnet ved markedsordningen, er tilstržkkelige til at opveje den mangel p effektivitet, der skyldes, at stżtten kun kan ydes til en specifik form for producenter af frugt og grżntsager, nemlig producentorganisationerne. 
The Commission should also use the planned evaluation to establish whether the benefits of concentration of supply achieved by the policy are sufficient to compensate for the inequality caused by limiting the aid to one particular structure of fruit and vegetable growers: producer organisations.
I 1996 blev der truffet et politisk valg, der gik ud p, at producenter, der ikke er medlem af en producentorganisation, ikke kan modtage denne form for EU-stżtte. 
A policy choice was made in 1996 to exclude growers who are not in producer organisations from the benefits of the EU aid.
Hvis Kommissionen ikke kan bevise, at stżtten til producentorganisationerne giver virkelige resultater med hensyn til at styrke producenternes position p markedet, bżr der sžttes spżrgsmlstegn ved logikken i at udelukke andre producenter, og Kommissionen bżr tage denne mekanisme til stżtte af EUŐs frugt-og grżntsagsproducenter op til fornyet overvejelse. 
If the Commission cannot demonstrate that the support for producer organisations produces real gains in terms of strengthening their position in the market place, the rationale for excluding other producers from the EU aid should be questioned and the Commission should reconsider this mechanism for supporting the EUŐs fruit and vegetable growers.
Vedtaget af Revisionsretten i Luxembourg p mżdet den 28. juni 2006. 
This Report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 28 June 2006.
C 282/52 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 20.11.2006 BILAG REVISIONSKRITERIER FOR GODKENDELSE AF EFFEKTIVE DRIFTSPROGRAMMER Overensstemmelse med forordningen Yderligere kriterier Ń forvaltningsrevision Producentorganisationens udgangssituation 1. 
C 282/52 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 ANNEX AUDIT CRITERIA FOR THE APPROVAL OF EFFECTIVE OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES Compliance with the Regulation Additional performance audit criteria Producer organisationŐs initial situation 1.
Driftsprogrammet skal indeholde en beskrivelse af udgangssituationen, navnlig med hensyn til produktion, afsžtning og udstyr. 1. 
The operational programme should contain a description of the initial situation, in particular concerning production, marketing and equipment. 1.
Beskrivelsen bżr vise udgangssituationen for hvert enkelt af driftsprogrammets ml. 2. 
The description should show the starting situation in relation to each of the operational programmesŐ objectives. 2.
Beskrivelsen bżr omfatte et benchmark, der gżr det muligt at vurdere de fremskridt, der er gjort med hensyn til at opfylde mlene. 
The description should set a benchmark against which progress towards the objectives can be assessed. Operational programme objectives 1.
Driftsprogrammerne skal omfatte flere af de 11 EU-ml (miljżmlet er obligatorisk). 2. 
Operational programmes should include several of the 11 EU objectives (the environment objective is compulsory). 2.
I driftsprogrammet beskrives programmlene under hensyntagen til produktions-og afsžtnings-mulighederne. 
The operational programme should describe the objectives of the programme, bearing in mind the outlook for production and markets.
Medlemsstaten kontrollerer, at mlene er i overensstemmelse med forordningen. 1. 
The Member State should check the compliance of the objectives with the regulation. 1.
Mlene bżr vžre SMART: specifikke, s der ikke er tvivl om, hvad producentorganisationen żnsker at opn; mlelige (og tidsrelaterede), s deres opfyldelse kan overvges; opnelige, hvis de aktioner, der foresls i programmerne, gennemfżres, og relevante: De bżr hžnge sammen med producentorganisationens situation og markedssituation og med EUŐs 11 ml. 2. 
The objectives should be SMART: specific so that there is no doubt about what the producer organisation aims to achieve; measurable (and timed) so that their achievement can be monitored; achievable through implementing the actions proposed in the programmes; and relevant: coherent with the producer organisationŐs situation and market outlook, and with the EUŐs 11 objectives. 2.
Der bżr isžr fastsžttes ml og indikatorer eller kvantificerede ml, sledes at resultaterne kan vurderes, og sledes at det er muligt at vise medlemsstaterne, hvilken effekt programmet forventes at f med hensyn til mlopfyldelse. Aktionerne i driftsprogrammerne 1. 
In particular, targets, indicators or quantified objectives should be given to allow the achievements of the programme to be monitored and to demonstrate to the Member States the expected impact of the programme on its objectives. Operational programme actions 1.
Driftsprogrammerne skal indeholde en detaljeret beskrivelse af aktionerne. 
Operational programmes should include a detailed description of the actions.
Medlemsstaten kontrollerer programmets tekniske kvalitet, og om overslagene er velbegrundede. 
The Member State should check the technical quality of the programme and the soundness of its estimates.
Endelige rapporter (producentorganisationens evaluering ved programafslutningen) 1. 
Final reports (end-of-programme evaluations by the producer organisation) 1.
Producentorganisationerne forbereder rsrapporter, hvori de beskriver programgennemfżrelsen, og i den Čendelige rapportÇ medtages en vurdering af, i hvilket omfang programmlene er blevet opfyldt. 
Producer organisations should prepare annual reports describing implementation of the programme, and in the Ôfinal reportŐ include an assessment of the extent to which the programmesŐ objectives have been achieved.
Medlemsstaterne bżr tage de endelige rapporter i betragtning, nr de skal godkende nye programmer eller foretage žndringer, sledes at de undgr at medtage aktioner, som der er sandsynlighed for vil vžre ineffektive (bde for den pgžldende producentorganisation og for andre producentorganisationer). 
Member States should take account of final reports when approving new programmes or amendments in order to avoid inclusion of actions likely to be ineffective (for that and for other producer organisations).
Medlemsstaterne og Kommissionen bżr anvende oplysningerne i de endelige rapporter til at overvge ordningens effektivitet (i hvilket omfang producentorganisationerne opfylder mlene for driftsprogrammerne). 
Member States and the Commission should use the final report information to monitor the effectiveness of the policy (the extent to which producer organisations are achieving the operational programme objectives).
Godkendelse af driftsprogrammer 1. 
Approval of operational programmes 1.
Medlemsstaterne bżr, ud over at opfylde ovenstende krav, kontrollere, at programmet hžnger sammen żkonomisk. 2. ... og at de foreslede aktioner er stżtteberettigede. 
In addition to the above requirements, the Member State should check the economic consistency of the programme; 2. ...and the eligibility of the proposed expenditure.
Medlemsstaten godkender, afviser eller kržver žndringer til programmet. 
The Member State should approve, reject, or require amendments to the programme.
Medlemsstaterne forvisser sig om, at stżtten ydes i overensstemmelse med princippet om forsvarlig żkonomisk forvaltning: sparsommelighed, produktivitet og effektivitet. 
Member States should ensure that aid is granted in accordance with the principles of sound financial management: economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
Afgżrelser om at godkende driftsprogrammer bżr vžre tilstržkkeligt dokumenteret til at bevise, at de er truffet under overholdelse af princippet om forsvarlig żkonomisk forvaltning. 
Decisions to approve operational programmes should be sufficiently documented to demonstrate that they were taken according to the principles of sound financial management.
20.11.2006 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 282/53 KOMMISSIONENS SVAR RESUME I. Under denne ordning ydes der żkonomisk stżtte til de driftsprogrammer for frugt-og grżnsagsproducenter, som sžlger deres produkter via producentorganisationer. 
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/53 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The scheme provides financial support for the operational programmes of fruit and vegetable growers who market their products via producer organisations.
Ordningen blev indfżrt for at hjžlpe en opsplittet sektor med at forbedre sin position p et marked, der var domineret af et relativt lille antal store opkżbere. 
It was introduced to help a fragmented sector improve its position in a market dominated by a relatively small number of large purchasers.
I over 70 % af de sager, som Revisionsretten har gennemget, har man dog kunnet konstatere eller antage, at der er gjort et vist fremskridt mod at n de forskellige mlsžtninger (se punkt 54). 
The Commission recognises the CourtŐs concerns. However, some progress towards the related objectives could either be clearly seen or assumed in over 70 % of cases the Court audited (see paragraph 54).
Det er de nationale myndigheders ansvar at sikre, at de programmer, de godkender, ikke kun stemmer overens med disse retningslinjer, men ogs med de overordnede mlsžtninger i forordningerne. Medlemsstaterne fastsžtter selv deres egne detaljerede administrative ordninger, og Kommissionen kontrollerer, at de stemmer overens med forordningerne. 
It is for the national authorities to ensure that the programmes they approve harmonise not only with these guidelines, but also with the overall objectives set by the regulations. Member States decide on their own detailed administrative arrangements and the Commission verifies that these are in compliance with the regulations.
Under Kommissionens forskellige regnskabsafslutningsbesżg og skrivebordskontroller har den vžret sžrligt opmžrksom p at sikre, at medlemsstaternes forvaltnings-og kontrolsystemer giver tilstržkkelig stor sikkerhed for, at de anmeldte udgifter stemmer overens med kravene i lovgivningen. 
During its various Clearance of Accounts missions and desk audits, the Commission paid particular attention to ensuring that Member StatesŐ systems of management and control offer reasonable assurance that expenditure declared conforms to the regulatory requirements.
Hvor der var behov derfor, fżrte dette til, at der blev foretaget overensstemmelsesvurderinger af procedurerne for godkendelse og overvgning af driftsprogrammerne. 
This led, where appropriate, to assessments of compliance of the procedures for approving and monitoring operational programmes.
Der fżlges op p svagheder via regnskabsafslutningsprocessen, og der foretages, hvor dette mtte vžre nżdvendigt, finansielle korrektioner over for den pgžldende medlemsstat. 
Weaknesses are followed up via the Clearance of Accounts process and give rise, where necessary, to financial corrections against the Member State concerned.
Under det fžlles forvaltningssystem er medlemsstaterne primžrt ansvarlige for at evaluere og kontrollere, at enhver given foranstaltning er effektiv. 
Under the shared management system, Member States are primarily responsible for evaluating and controlling the effectiveness of any given action.
P mżder med medlemsstaterne i forvaltningsudvalget og bilateralt drżfter Kommissionen regelmžssigt stżtteordningens funktion, herunder spżrgsml vedrżrende effektivitet. 
The Commission regularly discusses the functioning of the aid scheme, including issues related to effectiveness, with Member States in the Management Committee meetings and bilaterally.
Spżrgsmlet om effektivitet vil blive drżftet yderligere i forbindelse med konsekvensanalyser og den kommende evaluering, hvor der vil blive taget hensyn til Revisionsrettens bemžrkninger. 
The issue of effectiveness will be addressed further in the impact assessment and the forthcoming evaluation, where the CourtŐs observations will be taken into account.
Desuden vil der i den kommende reform blive lagt stżrre vžgt p at gżre kravene til medlemsstaternes rapportering og overvgning til mere effektive redskaber, som de kan bruge i deres vurdering af politikkens effektivitet. 
Moreover, more attention will be paid in the forthcoming reform to making the requirements on reporting and monitoring by Member States more effective tools for them in their assessment of the effectiveness of the policy.
V. Kommissionen noterer med tilfredshed, at Revisionsrettens resultater alt i alt giver et positivt billede af de fremskridt, som producentorganisationerne har gjort takket vžre Fžllesskabets stżtte. 
V. The Commission is pleased to note that the CourtŐs findings give a positive global picture of progress made by producer organisations thanks to Community support.
Den er dog enig i, at stżtten kan blive mere effektiv, hvis den mlrettes bedre, og den vil sżge at lżse dette problem i den lżbende konsekvensanalyse. 
However, it does agree that the aid can be more effective if better targeted, and it will address this issue in the on-going impact assessment.
Ud over de informationskilder, som Revisionsretten nžvner, findes der indirekte indikatorer, for s vidt angr mlsžtningen for at forbedre kvaliteten (det stigende antal geografiske indikatorer og kvalitetsmžrker i forbindelse med frugt-og grżnsagsprodukter), om end disse dog ikke specifikt viser de fremskridt, som producentorganisationerne har gjort. 
In addition to the sources of information cited by the Court, indirect indicators exist as far as the objective of improving quality (the increasing number of geographic indicators and quality labels related to fruit and vegetable products) is concerned, although these do not show specifically the progress made by producer organisations.
Kommissionen tilslutter sig Revisionsrettens bekymring i henseende til at n mlet p de 60 %. 
The Commission shares the CourtŐs concerns regarding achievement of the 60 % target.
Den mener dog, at billedet er mere komplekst end som s. 
However, it considers that the picture is more complex.
Instrumentet er blevet brugt p meget forskellige mder i medlemsstaterne, og resultaterne er ikke alle negative. 
The instrument has been used in very different ways in different Member States, and results are not uniformly negative.
Andre mere opmuntrende data bżr ogs understreges, isžr oprettelsen af sammenslutninger af producentorganisationer og etableringen af store producentorganisationer i nogle medlemsstater siden reformen af politikken i 1996 (navnlig i Belgien, Nederlandene og Italien), hvoraf nogle allerede nu danner modvžgt til de store grossisters stžrke forhandlingsposition. 
Other more encouraging data should be highlighted, in particular the formation of Associations of Producer Organisations (APOs) and the emergence of big producer organisations in some Member States since the reform of the policy in 1996 (in particular BE, NL and IT), some of which are already able to counterbalance the bargaining power of big retailers.
I lyset af den żgede markedsnedgang, som er en del af Doha-udviklingsdagsordenen og den żgede koncentration p efter-spżrgselssiden, er denne politiske tilgang stadig det instrument, der er mest velegnet til at sikre en bedre balance i kžden (mellem producenter og forbrugere). 
This policy approach, having in mind the increased market access implied by the Doha Development Agenda and the increasing concentration of the demand side, is still the best instrument to try to achieve a better balanced chain (between producers and consumers).
Et af mlene med den kommende reform er at rette op p svaghederne og styrke de eksisterende instrumenter, navnlig ved at tilskynde til sammenlžgninger mellem producentorganisationer, sammenslutninger af producentorganisationer, samarbejde mellem producentorganisationer og producentorganisationer med en tvžrnational dimension. 
One of the aims of the forthcoming reform is to address the weaknesses and to reinforce the available instruments, in particular by favouring mergers between producer organisations, Associations of producer organisations, cooperation between producer organisations, and producer organisations with a transnational dimension.