natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Selv om der mangler klare retningslinjer, har nogle EU-delegationer taget initiativ til at medvirke til at udbrede kendskabet til de tilskud, der ydes under regionale investeringsfaciliteter. 
Although clear guide‐ lines are lacking, some EU delegations have taken the initiative to help publi‐ cise the grants of the regional invest‐ ment facilities.
Konklusioner og 25 anbefalinger Konklusioner 53 Retten konkluderer, at det generelt har vžret effektivt at blande tilskud, der ydes under regionale investeringsfaciliteter, og ln fra finansielle institutioner til at stżtte EUŐs eksterne politikker. 
Conclusions and 25 recommendations Conclusions 53 The Court concludes that blending the regional investment facility grants with loans from financial institutions to support EU external policies has been generally effective.
De regionale investeringsfaciliteter var udformet hensigtsmžssigt, men de potentielle fordele ved at blande tilskud og ln blev ikke udnyttet fuldt ud p grund af mangler ved Kommissionens forvaltning. 
The regional investment facilities were well set up but the potential benefits of blending were not fully realised due to Commis‐ sion management shortcomings.
54 Sammen med medlemsstaterne har Kommissionen med succes ivžrksat de regionale investeringsfaciliteter, og deres overordnede struktur er hensigtsmžssig. 
54 Together with the Member States, the Commission successfully launched the regional investment facilities and their overall set‐up is appropriate.
En ržkke europžiske finansielle institutioner blev tiltrukket, hvorved der blev fundet tilstržkkelige projekter til de disponible midler. 
A number of European financial institutions were attracted that identified sufficient projects for the funding available.
De reviderede projekter var relevante for udviklingsbehovene i de pgžldende regioner og lande. 
The audited projects were relevant to the development needs of the regions and countries concerned.
Tilskudstyperne var passende, men Kommissionens gennemgang af tilskudsansżgningerne var baseret p ufuldstžndige oplysninger og havde ikke tilstržkkelig fokus p tilskuddenes mervžrdi. 
Although the grant types were appropriate, the Commission’s review of grant applica‐ tions was based on incomplete infor‐ mation and has not focused enough on the added value of grants.
Nr tilskuddene fżrst var godkendt, var de udbetalte forskud unżdvendigt hżje, og Kommissionens overvgning sikrede ikke, at der i alle tilfžlde blev opnet mervžrdi af tilskuddene. 
Once grants were approved, the advance disbursements were unnecessarily high and the Commission’s monitoring did not ensure that the added value of grants was achieved in all cases.
55 De regionale investeringsfaciliteter lettede koordineringen mellem udviklingspartnerne p de forskellige niveauer, hvilket har gjort det muligt at finansiere projekter, som ville have vžret for store at finansiere for en enkelt donor eller finansiel institution. 
55 The regional investment facilities facili‐ tated coordination between develop‐ ment partners at various levels, which has made it possible to fund projects that would be too large for financing by a single donor or financial institu‐ tion.
Andre potentielle fordele ved at blande tilskud og ln er endnu ikke helt net. 
However, the other potential ben‐ efits of blending grants and loans have not yet been fully achieved.
I halvdelen af tilfžldene har blanding gjort det muligt at optage ln, for eksempel ved at gżre dem til ln p lempelige vilkr i overensstemmelse med IMFŐs krav. 
In half of the cases, blending has enabled loans to be contracted for instance by mak‐ ing them concessional, in line with IMF requirements.
I den anden halvdel af tilfžldene var der imidlertid ingen overbevisende analyse, der viste, at tilskuddene var nżdvendige for, at de finansielle institutioner kunne indg aftale om lnet. 
In the other half of the cases, however, there was no convinc‐ ing analysis to show that a grant was necessary for the financial institutions to contract the loans.
Hertil kommer, at Kommissionen ikke drog fuld fordel af muligheden for at indvirke positivt p, hvordan projekter blev udformet, eller for mere generelt at indvirke p sektorspecifikke politikker. 
Furthermore, the Commission did not fully capitalise on the potential for a positive impact on the way projects were set up or for a wider impact on sector policy.
Synligheden af EUŐs stżtte har indtil videre vžret begržnset, selv om Kommissionen er begyndt at rette op p situationen. 
The visibility of EU support has been lim‐ ited so far, although the Commission has started to address the situation.
Anbefalinger 56 Efter syv rs erfaringer med de regionale investeringsfaciliteter sżger Kommissionen at forbedre deres udformning og funktion, f.eks. ved at udarbejde retningslinjer og deltage i EUŐs platform for blanding i eksternt samarbejde. 
Recommendations 56 After 7 years experience with the regional investment facilities, the Com‐ mission is seeking to improve their set‐up and operation, for instance by preparing guidelines and participat‐ ing in the EU Platform for Blending in External Cooperation.
I denne proces opfordrer Retten Kommissionen til at tage fżlgende anbefalinger i betragtning. 
In this pro‐ cess, the Court invites the Commis‐ sion to take account of the following recommendations.
Konklusioner og anbefalinger 26 57 Kommissionen bżr sikre, at EUŐs tilskud tildeles p basis af en dokumenteret vurdering af tilskuddenes mervžrdi med hensyn til opnelse af EUŐs ml for udvikling, naboskab og udvidelse. 
Conclusions and recommendations 26 57 The Commission should ensure that the allocation of EU grants is based on a documented assessment of the added value resulting from the grants in terms of achieving EU development, neighbourhood and enlargement ob‐ jectives.
58 Kommissionen bżr kun udbetale stżtte, nr stżttemodtageren reelt har brug for det. 
58 The Commission should disburse fund‐ ing only when the funds are actually needed by the beneficiary.
59 Kommissionen bżr forbedre sin overvgning af anvendelsen af EU-tilskud. 
59 The Commission should improve its monitoring of the EU grant implemen‐ tation.
I den forbindelse bżr den: a) gennemfżre en ramme for resul-tatmling, der omfatter indikatorer for opfżlgning af virkningen af EU-tilskud b) give EU-delegationerne klare instrukser med hensyn til deres rolle i tilsynet med EUŐs stżtte til blandede projekter c) inkludere ITF i ROM-processen og tilpasse ROM-metoden til de karakteristiske tržk ved blanding. 
In doing so, the Commission should: (a) implement a results‐measurement framework that includes indicators for following up the impact of EU grants; (b) provide clear instructions to EU delegations regarding their role in monitoring EU support for blend‐ ed projects; (c) include the ITF in the ROM process and adapt ROM methodology to the specific characteristics of blending.
60 Kommissionen bżr żge sin indsats for at sikre, at EU-finansieringen bliver tilstržkkelig synlig ved at opstille klare krav til synlighed for finansielle institutioner og kržve, at EU-delegationerne deltager i synlighedsaktioner. 
60 The Commission should increase its efforts to ensure that appropriate visibility is afforded to EU funding by defining clear visibility requirements for financial institutions and requiring the EU delegations to be involved in visibility actions.
Vedtaget af Afdeling III, der ledes af Karel PINXTEN, medlem af Revisionsretten, i Luxembourg p mżdet den 8. juli 2014. 
This report was adopted by Chamber III, headed by Mr Karel PINXTEN, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 8 July 2014.
P Revisionsrettens vegne Vtor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Formand 
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President
Bilag 27 De regionale investeringsfaciliteters globale džkning Den latinamerikanske investeringsfacilitet (LAIF) Ń 2010 Tilskud i alt: 762 millioner euro Ln i alt: 4 549 millioner euro Tilskud i alt: 190 millioner euro Ln i alt: 4 515 millioner euro Den caribiske investeringsfacilitet (CIF) Ń 2012 Tilskud i alt: 35 millioner euro Ln i alt: 67 millioner euro Stillehavsomrdets investeringsfacilitet (IFP) Ń 2012 Naboskabsinvesteringsfaciliteten (NIF) Ń 2008 Tilskud i alt: 953 millioner euro Ln i alt: 9 626 millioner euro Den asiatiske investeringsfacilitet (AIF) Ń 2012 Tilskud i alt: 36 millioner euro Ln i alt: 358 millioner euro Investeringsrammen for Vestbalkan (WBIF) Ń 2008 Tilskud i alt: 302 millioner euro Ln i alt: 2 720 millioner euro Investeringsfaciliteten for Centralasien (IFCA) Ń 2010 Tilskud i alt: 64 millioner euro Ln i alt: 317 millioner euro EUŐs trustfond for infrastrukturer i Afrika (ITF) Ń 2007 Tilskud i alt: uoplyst Ln i alt: uoplyst Bilag I Kilde: Databaser forvaltet af de regionale investeringsfaciliteters sekretariater. Bilag 28 De belżb, som der er indget forpligtelser for og indget kontrakt om, og som er udbetalt af Kommissionen for de enkelte regionale investeringsfaciliteter pr. 
Annexes 27 Global coverage of regional investment facilities Latin America Investment Facility (LAIF) - 2010 Total grants: 190 million euro Total loans: 4 515 million euro Caribbean Investment Facility (CIF) - 2012 Total grants: 35 million euro Total loans: 67 million euro Total grants: 953 million euro Total loans: 9 626 million euro Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF) - 2008 Asian Investment Facility (AIF) - 2012 Total grants: 36 million euro Total loans: 358 million euro Western Balkan Investment Framework (WBIF) - 2009 Total grants: 302 million euro Total loans: 2 720 million euro Investment Facility for Central Asia (IFCA) - 2010 Total grants: 64 million euro Total loans: 317 million euro EU-Africa Infrastructure Trust fund (ITF) - 2007 Total grants: 762 million euro Total loans: 4 549 million euro Investment Facility for the Pacific (IFP) - 2012 Total grants: N/A Total loans: N/A Annex I Source: Databases held by the secretariats of the regional investment facilities.
31. december 2013 (millioner euro) Forpligtet Kontraheret Udbetalt ITF 638 638 459 WBIF 274 260 214 NIF1 789 477 422 LAIF1 179 160 78 IFCA 86 66 22 AIF 60 34 9 CIF 70 2 Ń 1 IFP 10 Ń I alt 2 106 1 637 1 205 1 Heri indgr ikke yderligere 17 millioner euro, som der i 2011 blev indget forpligtelse for til klimažndringsfaciliteten, og som skal deles mellem NIF og LAIF. 
Annexes 28 Amounts committed, contracted and paid by the Commission per regional investment facility as at 31.12.2013 (million euro) Committed Contracted Paid ITF 638 638 459 WBIF 274 260 214 NIF1 789 477 422 LAIF1 179 160 78 IFCA 86 66 22 AIF 60 34 9 CIF 70 2 1 IFP 10 - - Totals 2 106 1 637 1 205 1 This does not include an additional 17 million euro committed in 2011 for Climate Change Facility to be shared between NIF and LAIF.
Bilag II 
Annex II
Bilag 29 Antal projekter godkendt under de enkelte regionale investeringsfaciliteter for perioden 2007-2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 I alt ITF 4 4 9 13 13 11 15 69 WBIF Ń 18 47 16 42 31 24 178 NIF Ń 14 13 15 15 18 17 92 LAIF Ń Ń Ń 5 3 12 5 25 IFCA Ń Ń Ń 1 3 3 4 11 AIF Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń 3 5 8 CIF Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń 4 4 I alt 4 36 69 50 76 78 74 387 Kilde: Databaser forvaltet af de regionale investeringsfaciliteters sekretariater. 
Annexes 29 Number of projects approved by regional investment facility for the 2007–13 period 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Totals ITF 4 4 9 13 13 11 15 69 WBIF - 18 47 16 42 31 24 178 NIF - 14 13 15 15 18 17 92 LAIF - - - 5 3 12 5 25 IFCA - - - 1 3 3 4 11 AIF - - - - - 3 5 8 CIF - - - - - - 4 4 Totals 4 36 69 50 76 78 74 387 Source: Databases held by the secretariats of the regional investment facilities.
Bilag III 
Annex III
Bilag 30 Bidrag til de 387 projekter, der blev godkendt under regionale investeringsfaciliteter for perioden 2007-2013 (millioner euro) ITF1 WBIF NIF LAIF IFCA AIF CIF I alt TILSKUD Investeringsfacilitet Kommissionen 383 226 696 190 64 36 35 1 630 Andre donorer 114 Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń 114 Nationale/regionale vejledende programmer 80 Ń 200 Ń Ń Ń Ń 280 Andre donorer 185 76 57 Ń Ń Ń Ń 318 Tilskud i alt 762 302 953 190 64 36 35 2 342 LN EU Multilaterale 1 237 2 360 7 095 209 312 110 Ń 11 323 Bilaterale 1 127 360 2 531 1 992 5 248 37 6 300 Regionale 1 174 Ń Ń 2 314 Ń Ń 30 3 518 Ikke-EU Multilaterale 826 Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń 826 Bilaterale 185 Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń Ń 185 Ln i alt 4 549 2 720 9 626 4 515 317 358 67 22 152 1 Kommissionens og andre donorers bidrag til ITF beregnet som en del af betalingerne til fonden. 
Annexes 30 Contributions to the 387 projects approved by the regional investment facility for the 2007–13 period (million euro) ITF1 WBIF NIF LAIF IFCA AIF CIF Totals GRANTS Investment facility Commission 383 226 696 190 64 36 35 1 630 Other donors 114 - - - - - - 114 National/regional indicative programmes 80 - 200 - - - - 280 Other donors 185 76 57 - - - - 318 Total grants 762 302 953 190 64 36 35 2 342 LOANS EU Multilateral 1 237 2 360 7 095 209 312 110 - 11 323 Bilateral 1 127 360 2 531 1 992 5 248 37 6 300 Regional 1 174 - - 2 314 - - 30 3 518 Non-EU Multilateral 826 - - - - - - 826 Bilateral 185 - - - - - - 185 Total loans 4 549 2 720 9 626 4 515 317 358 67 22 152 1 ITF Commission and other donors’ contributions calculated as pro rata of the payments made to the Fund.
Kilde: Databaser forvaltet af de regionale investeringsfaciliteters sekretariater. 
Source: Databases held by the secretariats of the regional investment facilities.
Bilag IV 
Annex IV
Bilag 31 Ln fra finansielle institutioner ydet under de enkelte regionale investeringsfaciliteter for perioden 2007-2013 (millioner euro) EIB EBRD AFD KfW Andre finansielle institutioner I alt ITF 1 237 Ń 881 246 Ń 2 364 WBIF 1 760 600 200 160 Ń 2 720 NIF 4 498 2 588 1 100 1 429 11 9 626 LAIF 209 Ń 823 772 397 2 201 IFCA 170 142 Ń 4 1 317 AIF 110 Ń 203 45 Ń 358 CIF Ń Ń 37 Ń Ń 37 I alt 7 984 3 330 3 244 2 656 409 17 623 Kilde: Databaser forvaltet af de regionale investeringsfaciliteters sekretariater. 
Annexes 31 Financial institution loans by regional investment facility for the 2007–13 period (million euro) EIB EBRD AFD KfW Other financial institutions Total ITF 1 237 - 881 246 - 2 364 WBIF 1 760 600 200 160 - 2 720 NIF 4 498 2 588 1 100 1 429 11 9 626 LAIF 209 - 823 772 397 2 201 IFCA 170 142 - 4 1 317 AIF 110 - 203 45 - 358 CIF - - 37 - - 37 Total 7 984 3 330 3 244 2 656 409 17 623 Source: Databases held by the secretariats of the regional investment facilities.
Bilag V 
Annex V
Bilag 35 Projekter nžvnt i punkt 42 Facilitet Projekttitel Redskab Tilskudsbelżb (millioner euro) Land/region Ledende finansieringsinstitution ITF Strżmforbindelse Rentegodtgżrelser 13 Elfenbenskysten - Sierra Leone - Liberia - Guinea EIB ITF Strżmforbindelse i Caprivienklaven Rentegodtgżrelser 15 Zambia - Namibia - Sydafrika EIB ITF Rehabilitering af Great East-vejen Rentegodtgżrelser 25 Zambia - Malawi - Mozambique EIB ITF Den żstafrikanske transportkorridor Rentegodtgżrelser 17 Tanzania - Kenya - Uganda - Rwanda - Burundi - Den Demokratiske Republik Congo EIB ITF Itezhi Tezhi Rentegodtgżrelser 18 Zambia EIB NIF Program for bedre vand-og spildevandstjenester Tilskud 5 Egypten KfW NIF Sporvejssystem i Rabat Teknisk bistand 5 Marokko AFD NIF 2. fase i TunisŐ hurtige jernbanenet Tilskud 28 Tunesien AFD NIF Modernisering af vandinfrastrukturen Teknisk bistand/tilskud 8 Georgien EIB NIF SMV-finansieringsfaciliteten Teknisk bistand/tilskud 15 Armenien, Aserbajdsjan, Georgien, Moldova, Ukraine, Hviderusland EBRD NIF Strżmtransmission Teknisk bistand/tilskud 16 Egypten EIB NIF Żst-vest-motorvej Tilskud 20 Georgien EIB NIF Solcelleanlžg i Ouarzazate Tilskud 30 Marokko EIB NIF Programme for drikkevandseffektivitet Teknisk bistand/tilskud 7 Marokko KfW NIF Cairos Metros Linje 3, fase III Teknisk bistand/tilskud 40 Egypten AFD Bilag IX 
Annexes 35 Projects referred to in paragraph 42 Facility Project title Tool Grant amount (million euro) Country/region Lead finance institution ITF Power interconnector Interest rate subsidy 13 Cote d’Ivoire, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea EIB ITF Caprivi interconnector Interest rate subsidy 15 Zambia, Namibia, South Africa EIB ITF Great east road rehabilitation Interest rate subsidy 25 Zambia, Malawi, Mozambique EIB ITF Eastern Africa transport corridor Interest rate subsidy 17 Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo EIB ITF Itezhi Tezhi Interest rate subsidy 18 Zambia EIB NIF Improved water and wastewater services programme Grant 5 Egypt KfW NIF Tramway de Rabat Technical assistance 5 Morocco AFD NIF 2nd phase fast railway network of Tunis Grant 28 Tunisia AFD NIF Water infrastructure modernisation II Technical assistance/Grant 8 Georgia EIB NIF SME Finance Facility Technical Assistance/Grant 15 Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, Belarus EBRD NIF Power transmission Technical assistance/Grant 16 Egypt EIB NIF East–West highway Grant 20 Georgia EIB NIF Ouarzazate solar plant Grant 30 Morocco EIB NIF Drinking water efficiency programme Technical assistance/Grant 7 Morocco KfW NIF Cairo Metro Line 3, phase III Technical assistance/Grant 40 Egypt AFD Annex IX
Kommissionen har udviklet denne struktur under hensyntagen til de potentielle fordele ved faciliteterne og mener, at dens forvaltning har vžret tilfredsstillende. 
Reply of the 36 Commission The Commission has devised this set‐up taking full account of the potential benefits of the facili‐ ties and considers that its management has been adequate.
Kommissionen mener, at der ved vurderingen af, hvorvidt de potentielle fordele er blevet opnet, skal tages hensyn til tilskuddenes art (f.eks. teknisk bistand) og resultaterne af gennemfżrelsen af projekterne. 
The Commission considers that the realisation of the potential benefits should take into account the nature of the grants (e.g. technical assistance) and the results of the implementation of the projects.
VI Kommissionen mener, at godkendelsesprocessen var grundig: Alle de relevante parter inddrages i tilstržkkeligt omfang, og Kommissionen tilpasser hżringsprocessen til de sžrlige forhold, der pržger projekterne. 
VI The Commission considers that the approval pro‐ cess was thorough: all relevant stakeholders are adequately involved and the Commission adapts the consultation process to the specificities of the projects.
Det sikres i alle tilfžlde, at der opns en mervžrdi: Projekterne forelžgges fżrst for det kompetente administrative udvalg, nr alle projektets bestanddele er afklaret, og dets mervžrdi tydeligt fremgr. 
Sufficient and complete information is available during the decision‐making process. Added value is assured in all cases: Projects are submitted to the competent Operational Board only when all the project components have been clari‐ fied and its added value is apparent.
Reglerne for udbetaling af forskud bliver revideret i de nye kontraktmodeller for finansielle instrumenter. 
The arrangements for advance disbursements are being reviewed in the new contract templates for financial instruments.
VII Kommissionen mener, at begrundelsen for finansieringen var klar i alle disse tilfžlde. 
VII The Commission considers that justification for the financing was clear in all cases.
Disse tilfžlde beskrives i punkt 42 i denne beretning og er blevet behżrigt anfžgtet og begrundet af Kommissionen. 
These cases are described in paragraph 42 of this report and have been duly contested and justified by the Com‐ mission.
Se Kommissionens svar p punkt 42, litra a)-g). 
Please see Commission’s reply to para‐ graph 42, (a) to (g).
I alle disse tilfžlde er prioriteterne for faciliteterne blevet tilpasset til EUŐs sektorpolitikker for hver af regionerne (som klart er anfżrt i deres respektive strategiske retningslinjer). 
In all cases, the priorities of the facilities have been aligned to EU sector policies for each of the regions (clearly stated in their respective Strategic Orientations).
Kommissionen vil dog se p, hvordan man kan opn en stżrre indvirkning p sektorpolitikken, og hvordan EUŐs stżtte kan gżres mere synlig. 
Nevertheless, the Commission will look into ways for the achievement of a wider impact on sec‐ tor policy as well as for enhancing visibility of EU support.
Kommissionens svar 37 VIII Kommissionen noterer sig, at de anbefalinger, som Revisionsretten fremsžtter, stemmer helt overens med den reform af faciliteterne, som Kommissionen ivžrksatte i slutningen af 2013, og som nu er net til godkendelsesfasen. 
Reply of the Commission 37 VIII The Commission notes that the recommendations made by the Court are totally aligned with the reform of the facilities that the Commission has started at the end of 2013 and which is now enter‐ ing the approval phase.
Indledning Tekstboks 1 IMF kržver ikke lžngere, at hvert enkelt ln skal ydes p lempelige vilkr; i stedet fastsžtter den en samlet vžgtet procentsats for ln p lempelige vilkr, der gžlder for den samlede lntagning. 
Introduction Box 1 The IMF no longer sets loan‐by‐loan concessional‐ ity requirements, instead it sets an overall average weighted concessionality rate for all borrowings.
Denne mekaniske strategi vil derfor ikke automatisk blive anvendt fremover. 
Hence this mechanistic approach will not automati‐ cally apply in the future.
08 Kommissionen overvejer nu at žndre ITF, s den forvaltes ligesom de żvrige seks regionale faciliteter, sledes at det er de samme regler, der gžlder for dem alle, hvilket vil gżre processen mere gennemsigtig og forudsigelig for alle partnerne og sikre lige rettigheder for alle medlemsstaterne i de administrative udvalg. 
08 The Commission is now considering modifying the ITF in order for it to be managed like the other six regional facilities having the same rules for all and therefore increasing transparency and predictability of the process for all partners and ensuring equal rights to all Member States in operational boards.
Desuden kan de sžrlige midler, som medlemsstaterne afsžtter til blanding, stadig forvaltes af EIB, hvis de żnsker det. 
Furthermore the special funds allocated by the Member States to blending can be still managed by the EIB if they so desire.
12 Kommissionen stżtter aktivt, at flere agenturer i medlemsstaterne deltager i gennemfżrelsen af faciliteterne for at sikre lige muligheder og żget udveksling af bedste praksis. 
12 The Commission is actively promoting the involve‐ ment of more Member States agencies in the imple‐ mentation of the facilities to ensure equal opportu‐ nities and increased exchange of best practices.
Bemžrkninger 16 Kommissionen mener, at forvaltningen af de regionale investeringsfaciliteter har vžret tilfredsstillende. 
Observations 16 The Commission considers that the management of the regional investment facilities has been adequate.
Kommissionen er ansvarlig for oprettelsen af faciliteterne, som bedżmmes positivt i beretningen. 
The Commission is responsible for the set‐up of the facilities, assessed positively in the report.
Forvaltningen af projekterne gennemfżres i partnerskab. 
The management of the projects is carried out in partnership.
Kommissionen administrerer faciliteterne, mens udviklingsfinansieringsinstitutio-nerne er ansvarlige for den daglige forvaltning af projekterne. 
The Commission administers the facili‐ ties while the development finance institutions are responsible for the daily management of the pro‐ jects.
De gennemfżrer de budgetopgaver, som de har fet plagt, i overensstemmelse med reglerne for indirekte forvaltning, der er fastsat i finansforordningen. 
They implement the budget tasks that have been entrusted to them, in compliance with the rules of the indirect management mode laid down in the Financial Regulation.
Kommissionen har udviklet denne struktur under hensyntagen til de potentielle fordele ved faciliteterne. 
The Commission has devised this set‐up taking full account of the potential benefits of the facilities.