natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Derfor er det i mange tilfžlde sdan, at Kommissionens foranstaltninger korrigerer/forebygger fejl vedrżrende en bestemt del af et OP og relaterer til bestemte fejltyper. 
Therefore, the Commission’s measures in many cases correct/prevent errors related to a part of an OP and are related to certain specific types of errors.
Kommissionen bestržbte sig p at żge virkningen af sine forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner ved at udvide dem til at omfatte andre programmer, hvor der var konstateret lignende svagheder. 
The Commission made efforts to increase the effect of its preventive measures and financial corrections by extending these measures to other programmes where similar weaknesses have been noted.
Dette fżrte til en żget effekt (jf. tekstboks 4). 
This led to an increased impact (see Box 4).
Kommissionens rapportering om forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner gjorde det svžrt at f et omfattende og analytisk overblik Oplysningerne om forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner gives i forskellige rapporter og dokumenter 112. 
The Commission’s reporting on preventive measures and financial corrections made it difficult to get a comprehensive and analytical overview Information on preventive measures and financial corrections is presented in several reports and documents 112.
Kommissionen rapporterede oplysninger om sine foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af EU-budgettet i flere forskellige publikationer. De vigtigste var de rlige aktivitetsrapporter fra de 58 Tekstboks 4 - Kommissionens gode praksis med hensyn til at żge effekten af sine foranstaltninger: Ungarn I efterret 2012 foretog Kommissionen en udbudsrelateret revision vedrżrende de ungarske OP'er for miljż og offentlig forvaltning. 
The Commission should report on preventive measures and financial corrections in a comprehensive and coherent way to ensure that relevant information is accessible and easy 57 Box 4 – Commission good practice in increasing the impact of its measures: Hungary In autumn 2012 the Commission carried out an audit on public procurement related to the Hungarian OPs for the Environment and for Public Administration.
Revisionen afslżrede, at et af de anvendte udvžlgelseskriterier (obligatorisk krav om registrering hos den ungarske ingeniżrsammenslutning ved budafgivelsen) var diskriminerende, og de reviderede programmer blev pržsuspenderet i forret 2013. 
This audit revealed that one of the selection criteria used (compulsory requirement for registration with the Hungarian Chamber of Engineers at the tender submission stage) was discriminatory and the audited programmes were pre‐ suspended in spring 2013.
Kommissionen mente, at manglerne var systematiske og rakte ud over de reviderede OP'er. 
The Commission considered these shortcomings to be systematic and to go beyond the remit of the OPs audited.
Derfor afbrżd den ogs betalingsfristen for Ungarns betalingsanmodninger vedrżrende to andre programmer (OP'erne for transport og social infrastruktur). 
This is why the Commission also interrupted payment claims introduced by Hungary for two additional programmes (OPs for Transport and Social Infrastructure).
Forvaltningsmyndighederne for disse programmer blev bedt om at analysere, om de regelstridige praksis ogs var forekommet i deres programmer. 
The managing authorities of these programmes were asked to analyse if the same erroneous practices had occurred in these programmes as well.
Som fżlge af den kontrol, de nationale myndigheder udfżrte, plagde Kommissionen finansielle korrektioner vedrżrende alle fire programmer. 
As a result of these verifications by the national authorities, the Commission imposed financial corrections on all four programmes.
ansvarlige generaldirektorater, EU's konsoliderede rsregnskab og den rlige meddelelse om beskyttelse af EU-budgettet. 
The main ones were the annual activity reports of the operational directorates‐general, the consolidated annual accounts of the EU, and the yearly “Communication on the protection of the EU budget”.
Disse blev suppleret af kvartalsrapporterne om finansielle korrektioner og den rlige forvaltnings-og effektivitetsrapport (indtil 2014 den rlige sammenfattende rapport om Kommissionens resultater p forvaltningsomrdet) (jf. tabel 5). 
These were complemented by the quarterly reports on financial corrections and the “Annual Management and Performance Report” (until 2014 the “Annual Synthesis Report on the Commission’s management achievements”) (see Table 5). 58
Tabel 5 - Kommissionens publikationer om forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner Titel Modtager(e) Forelžgges senest Džkning Indhold Offentliggjort siden rlige aktivitetsrapporter Europa-Parlamentet og Rdet 1 31. marts Specifikt politikomrde Den rlige aktivitetsrapport redegżr for rets resultater og initiativer som fastsat i forvaltningsplanen samt for anvendelsen af ressourcer. 
Table 5 ‐ Commission publications in relation to preventive measures and financial corrections Title To whom Presented by Coverage Content Published since Annual activity reports European Parliament and the Council 31 March1 specific policy area The annual activity report details the achievements and initiatives taken during the year and provided for in the management plan, as well as the resources used.
Den indeholder ogs detaljerede oplysninger om Kommissionens kontrolaktiviteter og de dermed forbundne forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner vedrżrende de enkelte medlemsstater. 
It also contains detailed Member State level information concerning the Commission's control activities and related preventive measures and financial corrections.
2007 rsregnskabet Europa-Parlamentet, Rdet og Revisionsretten 31. juli Hele budgettet EU's rsregnskab bestr af regnskabet (samt bemžrkningerne til det) og de konsoliderede beretninger om budgetgennemfżrelsen. 
The EU's annual accounts consist of the financial statements (and its notes) and the consolidated reports on the implementation of the budget.
Det indeholder samlede oplysninger om de finansielle korrektioner vedrżrende de enkelte fonde. 
It contains aggregate information per fund on financial corrections.
Til og med 2012 blev der om forebyggende foranstaltninger givet oplysninger for hver enkelt medlemsstat, men siden 2013 er der kun blevet offentliggjort samlede tal. 
Concerning preventive measures till 2012 (incl.) the information was provided per Member State, from 2013 however, only aggregated figures per fund are published.
Fra og med 2015 rapporteres oplysningerne om forebyggende foranstaltninger ikke i rsregnskabet, men kun i meddelelsen om beskyttelse af EU-budgettet Meddelelsen beskriver funktionen af de forebyggende og korrigerende mekanismer, der anvendes til at beskytte EU-budgettet mod ulovlige eller regelstridige udgifter, og angiver skżnnede tal for resultaterne af anvendelsen. 
As of 2015 the information on preventive measures is no longer reported in the annual accounts, but only in the Communication. 2007 Annual accounts European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors 31 July whole budget 2007 Communication European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors 31 October2 whole budget The Communication describes the functioning of the preventive and corrective mechanisms used to protect the EU budget from illegal or irregular expenditure, and to provide a best estimate of the figures resulting from their use.
Den indeholder samlede oplysninger om forebyggende foranstaltninger og samlede oplysninger svel som oplysninger for de enkelte medlemsstater om finansielle korrektioner. 
On preventive measures it contains aggregated information and on financial corrections it contains aggregated information as well as information at Member State level.
Kvartalsrapporterne giver regelmžssige oplysninger om de finansielle korrektioner vedrżrende de enkelte fonde under samhżrighedspolitikken. 
2012 Quarterly report European Parliament End of each quarter specific policy area The quarterly reports provide regular information on the financial corrections per fund under the cohesion policy.
Den sammenfattende rapport beskriver det foregende rs resultater p forvaltningsomrdet baseret p de forskellige generaldirektżrers rlige aktivitetsrapporter. 
The synthesis reports detail the previous year's management achievements based on the annual activity reports presented by the different Directors‐General.
2 Fra og med regnskabsret 2015 forelžgges meddelelsen som en del af den skaldte "integrerede regnskabsaflžggelsespakke" sammen med det konsoliderede rsregnskab senest den 31. juli. 
2 As of financial year 2015 the Communication document is presented as part of the so‐called ‘integrated financial reporting package’ together with the consolidated annual accounts by 31 July.
3 Fra og med regnskabsret 2015 indgr den sammenfattende rapport i den rlige forvaltnings-og effektivitetsrapport. 
3 From financial year 2015 the Synthesis Report is part of the Annual Management and Performance Report.
Samtlige rapporter undtagen de rlige aktivitetsrapporter var udarbejdet af Kommissionens Generaldirektorat for Budget p grundlag af oplysninger, som Generaldirektoratet for Regionalpolitik og Bypolitik og Generaldirektoratet for Beskžftigelse, Sociale Anliggender, Arbejdsmarkedsforhold og Inklusion havde fremlagt i overensstemmelse med instrukser eller retningslinjer (for generaldirektoraternes rlige aktivitetsrapporter) fra Generaldirektoratet for Budget. 
All reports, except for the annual activity reports, were compiled by the Commission’s Directorate‐General for Budget, based on the information provided by the Directorate‐ General for Regional and Urban Policy and the Directorate‐General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion according to the instructions or guidelines (for the annual activity reports of the Directorates‐General) issued by the Directorate‐General for Budget.
Indtil videre har ingen af Kommissionens rapporter givet et analytisk overblik over forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner i programperioden 2007-2013 115. 
So far, none of the Commission reports have provided an analytical overview of preventive measures and financial corrections for the 2007‐2013 programme period 115.
Samhżrighedsudgifterne er baseret p flerrig programmering. 
Cohesion spending is based on multi‐annual programming.
Vi mener derfor, at Kommissionen bżr forelžgge Europa-Parlamentet og Rdet en konsolideret rapport med aktuelle nżgleoplysninger om de forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner vedrżrende programperioden40. 
We consider therefore that the Commission should provide the European Parliament and the Council with a consolidated report containing key information on preventive measures and financial corrections relating to the programme period to date40.
Vores analyse af de relevante rapporter i tabel 5 viste imidlertid, at de tilsammen kun džkker forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner vedrżrende et antal r. 
The analysis of the relevant reports listed in Table 5, however, showed that collectively they present preventive measures and financial corrections in relation to a number of years.
Der var ingen planer om en sžrlig rapport, der kunne give et analytisk overblik over programperioden som helhed. 
However, no specific report providing an analytical overview was envisaged for the programme period as a whole.
Med hensyn til perioden 2000-2006 noterer vi, at Kommissionen i 2013 udsendte en ad hoc-rapport om de finansielle korrektioner og afslutningsstatus for EFRU-programmer, ESF-programmer og samhżrighedsfondsprojekter. 
As regards the 2000‐2006 period, we note that the Commission issued an ad hoc report on the financial corrections and status of closure of the ERDF and ESF programmes and CF projects in 2013.
Kommissionens rapporter indeholdt ikke tilstržkkelig mange sammenligninger mellem medlemsstaterne og eksempler p god praksis med hensyn til at forebygge, opdage og korrigere tilbagevendende problemer 118. 
Commission reports did not provide enough Member State comparisons and “good practice” examples on how to prevent, detect or correct recurrent problems 118.
Kommissionens rapporter bżr indeholde relevante oplysninger, som giver en bedre forstelse af situationen med hensyn til forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle 40 61 Sžrberetning nr. 
The Commission reports should provide relevant information which improves understanding of the situation regarding preventive measures and financial corrections, so that appropriate action can be taken to improve management and control systems.
36/2016 om vurdering af ordningen for afslutning af samhżrighedsprogrammerne og programmerne for udvikling af landdistrikter 2007-2013 (punkt 56) (http://eca.europa.eu). korrektioner, s forvaltnings-og kontrolsystemerne kan forbedres p en hensigtsmžssig mde. 
We therefore asked members of the European Parliament’s Budgetary Control and Regional Development committees and representatives of Member States of the Council of the 40 60 Special Report No 36/2016 on the assessment of the arrangements for closure of the 2007‐2013 cohesion and rural development programmes (paragraph 56) (http://eca.europa.eu).
De fleste af de adspurgte mente, at oplysningerne fra Kommissionen var tilstržkkelige eller endda for omfattende. 
Most of the interviewees found the information provided by the Commission to be sufficient, or even too much, in volume.
De adspurgte repržsentanter for medlemsstaterne syntes, at de rlige aktivitetsrapporter var den mest nyttige informationskilde, da de indeholder oplysninger, som de kan bruge til at benchmarke deres egne programmer i forhold til andre medlemsstaters programmer. 
Interviewees from Member States found the annual activity reports the most useful source of information as they contain information which can be used to benchmark their own programmes against those of other Member States.
Endelig skal det bemžrkes, at kun meget f af de adspurgte kendte til kvartalsrapporterne. 
Finally, very few of the interviewees were aware of the quarterly reports.
De fleste af de adspurgte mente, at Kommissionen kommunikerer klart om systemet for foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af EU-budgettet, men halvdelen ville gerne have flere oplysninger om den faktiske anvendelse af foranstaltningerne og deres praktiske konsekvenser. 
While most of the interviewees considered that the Commission clearly communicates the system and set‐up of the measures to protect the EU budget, half of them would like to have more information on the actual application of the measures and their practical implications.
Under vores samtaler blev fżlgende elementer efterlyst: forklaringer p tilbagevendende problemer vedrżrende anmeldelse af regelstridige udgifter, oplysninger om rsager til typiske eller gentagne fejl og anvisninger p bedste praksis med hensyn til at forebygge, opdage og korrigere dem. 
During our interviews the following issues were raised: explanations of recurrent problems in relation to declaring irregular expenditure, causes of typical or repetitive errors and “best practices” on how to prevent, detect or correct them.
Sdanne oplysninger kunne hjžlpe medlemsstaterne til at forbedre deres egne forvaltnings-og kontrolsystemer. 
Such information would help Member States to improve their own management and control systems.
Kommissionens informationssystemer giver ikke et konsolideret overblik over forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner 121. 
The Commission’s information systems do not provide a consolidated overview of preventive measures and financial corrections 121.
Kommissionens generaldirektorater registrerer de oplysninger, der er nżdvendige med henblik p overvgning af og rapportering om forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner, i deres regnskabssystem og i forskellige elektroniske regneark. 
The Commission’s Directorates‐General record the information necessary for monitoring and reporting on preventive measures and financial corrections in its accounting system and in different electronic spreadsheets.
Vi konstaterede, at der i disse regneark var forskellige mangler, som gjorde det svžrt at f et overblik og foretage dybtgende analyser: a) De forskellige systemer er ikke integreret, og data skal indfżres manuelt 62 b) Der er i forbindelse med de enkelte sager ikke noget overblik over alle Kommissionens foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af EU-budgettet. 
We found that the latter suffered from various shortcomings which made it difficult to get an easy overview and to perform in‐ depth analyses: (a) the different systems are not integrated and data needs to be entered manually; (b) there is no overview for individual cases of all measures taken by the Commission to protect the EU budget.
I stedet opbevares oplysningerne om henholdsvis forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner sžrskilt. 
Instead, information is kept separately for preventive measures and financial corrections.
Da der ikke er nogen forbindelse mellem de to, er det vanskeligt at fżlge, hvordan en sag udvikler sig fra den udlżsende begivenhed til ophžvelsen af de forebyggende foranstaltninger eller gennemfżrelsen af de finansielle korrektioner c) Databaserne indeholder ikke altid de oplysninger, som er nżdvendige for en sammenlignende analyse af sager. 
As there is no link between the two, it is difficult to see how cases evolve from the triggering event to the lifting of preventive measures or the implementation of financial corrections; and 61 (c) the databases do not always contain the necessary information for a comparative analysis between cases.
Det ville gżre det lettere for ISFCC at sikre, at ensartede sager behandles p en ensartet mde. 
This would facilitate the work of the ISFC Committee to ensure that similar cases are treated in a similar way.
De lovgivningsmžssige bestemmelser vedrżrende perioden 2014-2020 har i vžsentlig grad styrket Kommissionens muligheder for at beskytte EU-budgettet mod regelstridige udgifter 122. 
Regulatory provisions for the 2014‐2020 period significantly strengthened the Commission’s position in protecting the EU budget from irregular expenditure 122.
Nr Kommissionen med henblik p en ny programperiode etablerer og udformer systemet for forebyggende foranstaltninger og finansielle korrektioner, bżr den bygge p de indhżstede erfaringer og afhjžlpe de svagheder, der blev konstateret under gennemfżrelsen af programmer i de foregende perioder. 
When setting up and designing the system of preventive measures and financial corrections for a new programme period the Commission should build on the lessons learnt and should mitigate the weaknesses identified during the implementation of the programmes in previous periods.
Vi gennemgik derfor den relevante EU-lovgivning og sammenholdt den med de konstaterede mangler for at vurdere, i hvilket omfang dette var gjort med henblik p programperioden 2014-2020. 
We therefore reviewed relevant EU legislation and compared it with the shortcomings found, to assess to what extent this has been done for the 2014‐2020 programme period.
Rapporteringen om finansielle korrektioner er integreret i den rlige kontrolpakke og undersżges af revisionsmyndigheden 123. 
Reporting on financial corrections integrated in the annual assurance package and examined by the audit authority 123.
Med hensyn til programperioden 2007-2013 konstaterede Kommissionen selv mangler vedrżrende rigtigheden og fuldstžndigheden af oplysningerne i artikel 20-rapporterne, og vores revisioner viste, at der var risici forbundet med de finansielle korrektioner, som medlemsstaterne rapporterede, og som Kommissionen brugte til at beregne den kumulerede restrisiko (jf. punkt 103-106). 
For 2007‐2013 programme period, the Commission itself identified shortcomings in relation to the correctness and completeness of information provided in the Article 20 reports and our own audits also identified risks in relation to the Member States’ reported financial corrections that were used by the Commission to calculate the CRR (see paragraphs 103 to 106).
Med forordningerne for perioden 2014-2020 blev det indfżrt, at Kommissionen hvert r skal gennemg og godkende regnskaberne. 
The regulations for the 2014‐2020 period introduced an annual examination and acceptance of accounts by the Commission.
Hver medlemsstat skal indsende en kontrolpakke som led i den rlige regnskabsafslutning af hvert OP (eller hver gruppe af OP'er). 
Each year Member States need to submit an assurance package as part of the annual clearance procedure for each OP (or group of OPs).
Denne pakke indeholder rsregnskabet med oplysninger om de belżb, der er trukket tilbage eller 63 inddrevet41, forvaltningserklžringen og den rlige sammenfatning af udfżrte kontroller. 
This package consists of the annual accounts, including information on amounts withdrawn and recovered41; the management declaration and annual summary of the controls carried out.
Revisionsmyndigheden afgiver en revisionserklžring og forelžgger en rlig kontrolrapport. 
The audit authorities issue an audit opinion and provide an annual control report.
De fżrste kontrolpakker blev udarbejdet i fżrste halvdel af 2016. 
The first assurance packages were produced in the first half of 2016.
I modsžtning til i de foregende perioder skal oplysningerne om de belżb, der er trukket tilbage eller inddrevet, nu rapporteres i rsregnskabet og indg i medlemsstatens beregning af den kumulerede restrisiko for hvert OP (eller hver gruppe af OP'er). 
Unlike in previous periods, the information on withdrawn and recovered amounts is now required to be reported in the annual accounts and included in the Member State’s calculation of the CRR for the OP (or group of OPs).
Endvidere skal medlemsstatens revisionsmyndighed nu kontrollere fuldstžndigheden og plideligheden af disse oplysninger42. 
The completeness and reliability of this information is now also subject to verifications by the Member State’s audit authorities42.
P grundlag af disse dokumenter skal Kommissionen foretage en rlig undersżgelse af det operationelle program og i den forbindelse fastlžgge de stżtteberettigede udgifter for det pgžldende r. 
On the basis of these documents the Commission is required to perform an annual examination of the operational programme, in the course of which it determines the amount of expenditure eligible for the given year.
Medlemsstaterne vil blive anmodet om at korrigere alle uregelmžssigheder fżr den rlige regnskabsafslutning (dvs. tilbagetržkke eller inddrive regelstridige udgifter med mulighed for at erstatte dem med nye udgifter). 
Member States will be required to correct all irregularities before the annual clearance procedure (i.e. withdraw or recover irregular expenditure with the possibility of replacing it with new expenditure).
Hvis dette ikke sker, kan Kommissionen ivžrksžtte en procedure for finansiel korrektion. 
If this is not done the Commission can launch a financial correction procedure.
De lovgivningsmžssige bestemmelser vedrżrende perioden 2014-2020 giver Kommissionen flere befżjelser til at beskytte EU-budgettet Tilbageholdelse af 10 % fra alle mellemliggende betalinger i perioden 2014-2020 127. 
Legal provisions introduced for the 2014‐2020 period give more power to the Commission to protect the EU budget 10 % retention from all interim payments during the 2014‐2020 period 127.
Det betyder, at Kommissionen i lżbet af regnskabsret kun betaler 90 % af de anmeldte mellemliggende udgifter. 
This means that during the accounting year the Commission pays only 90 % of the declared interim expenditure.
De resterende 10 % afregnes efter indsendelsen og godkendelsen af kontrolpakken. 
The remaining 10 % is cleared after the submission and acceptance of the assurance package.
Denne tilbageholdelse af 10 % kan sammenlignes med en almindelig betingelsesbaseret sikkerhedsforanstaltning, idet pengene kan udbetales til medlemsstaten, hvis alt viser sig at vžre i orden i forbindelse med den rlige regnskabsafslutning. 
This 10 % retention by the Commission can be compared to a general conditional precautionary measure, which can be paid to the Member State if everything is found to be in order at the annual clearance.