natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dette skal efterprżves ved efterfżlgende kontrol p grundlag af stikprżver, jf. artikel 52 i forordning (EU) nr. 809/2014. 
This is to be verified with ex post checks on a sample basis as provided by Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 809/2014.
Kommissionens fžlles svar p punkt 79 og 81 I programmeringsperioden 2007-2013 var den fžlles overvgnings-og evalueringsramme (CMEF) et nyt element. 
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 79 and 81 In the 2007-2013 programming period, the CMEF was a new feature.
En ržkke medlemsstater havde brug for en indlžringsperiode til at sžtte sig ind i metoden for dataindsamling, behandling eller anvendelse af evalueringsresultaterne. 
Some Member States required a learning curve regarding the methodology of data collection, processing and the use of the evaluation results.
Oplysningerne via overvgnings-og evalueringssystemet var, selv om de var ufuldstžndige og muligvis ikke altid helt plidelige, nemmest tilgžngelige i denne fase under hensyntagen til finansielle og praktiske begržnsninger. 
Information available through the monitoring and evaluation system, while incomplete and possibly not always fully reliable, was the best available at this stage, taking into account financial and practical limitations.
Kommissionen har foreslet lżsninger p en ržkke problemer forbundet med overvgnings-og evalueringssystemet for programmeringsperioden 2014-2020, men der vil imidlertid altid vžre behov for at finde en balance mellem fordelene ved overvgning og evaluering og de hermed forbundne omkostninger og administrative byrder. 
The Commission has proposed solutions for a number of problems related to the monitoring and evaluation system for the programming period 2014-2020 but there will always be the need to find a balance between the benefits of monitoring and evaluation and the costs and administrative burden related to it.
80 I sine revisionsskrivelser til medlemsstaterne vedrżrende de rlige statusrapporter har Kommissionen opfordret myndighederne til at fremskynde kvantificeringen af indikatorerne. 
80 In its observation letters addressed to the Member States concerning the annual progress reports, the Commission has invited the authorities to speed up the process of quantification of the indicators.
Tekstboks 15 Det forhold, at der kun bor nogle f hundrede mennesker i en landsby, hvor der bygges en vej, siger ikke noget om, hvor mange der rent faktisk bruger eller kan bruge vejen. 
Box 15 The fact that only a few hundred of persons live in a village in which a road is built does not give information on how many actually use it or might use it.
Det er ikke kun befolkningen i landdistrikter, der modtager bedre tjenesteydelser. 
Not only the rural population benefits from improved services in rural areas.
Dobbelttžllingen af befolkningen i landdistrikter i forbindelse med foranstaltning 321 (landsbyforny-else) var tilsigtet og er et resultat af den anvendte metode. 
The double counting of the rural population for the aims of measure 322 (village renewal) was intended and is a result of the adopted methodology.
83 Der er ikke noget lovkrav om fastlžggelse af kvantificerede ml for de enkelte projekter. 
83 There is no legal requirement for setting quantified targets for each individual projects.
I henhold til CMEF skal forvaltningsmyndigheden fastsžtte LDP-ml. 
The CMEF foresees target setting at RDP level by the managing authority.
Som anfżrt i bilag II til beretningen havde fire ud af fem polske projekter kvantificerbare resultater, og den eneste undtagelse vedrżrte kultur-og sportsinfrastruktur. 
As shown in Annex II to the report, four out of five Polish projects had quantifiable results, while the only exception related to the cultural/sport infrastructure.
85 I det fžlles overvgnings-og evalueringssystem (CMES) for 2014-2020 vil den nye resultatindikator ČŽndring i landbrugsproduktionen p stżttede bedrifter/rsarbejdsenhederÇ blive vurderet af eksterne evaluatorer i 2017, 2019 og i de efterfżlgende evalueringer. 
85 For 2014-2020 CMES, the new result indicator 'Change in agricultural output on supported farms/ annual work unit’ will be assessed by external evaluators in 2017 and 2019 and in the ex post evaluations.
Efter Kommissionens opfattelse er denne hyppighed passende under hensyntagen til cost-benefit-forholdet for sdanne evalueringer. 
The Commission considers that this frequency is appropriate taking into account the cost/benefit ratio of such evaluations.
86 De to indikatorer i CMES for 2014-2020 (output-og resultatindikatorerne ČIndbyggere, som nyder godt af forbedrede tjenesteydelser eller forbedret infra-strukturÇ) supplerer hinanden. 
86 The two 2014-2020 CMES indicators (the output and result indicators 'population benefiting from improved services/infrastructure') will complement each other.
De mler brutto-og nettoantallet af indbyggere, som nyder godt af operationerne. 
They will measure respectively the gross and the net number of population benefiting for the operations.
87 Der vil blive foretaget en vurdering af virkningerne af foranstaltningerne i forhold til de programml, de bidrager til. 
87 The assessment of the effects of measures will be carried out against the programmes' objectives to which they contribute.
Programmernes fremskridt i retning af at n disse ml overvges regelmžssigt. 
The progress of the programmes against these targets is regularly monitored.
Denne tilgang afspejler en resultatorienteret strategi og giver bedre mulighed for at hndtere de kombinerede virkninger af foranstaltningerne i forhold til relevante ml. 
This approach reflects a result orientation of the policy and enables the combined effects of measures against relevant objectives to be better assessed.
Kommissionens svar 63 Medlemsstaterne kan opstille yderligere programspecifikke indikatorer for en ržkke centrale foranstaltninger. 
Reply of the Commission 63 The Member States can define additional programme-specific indicators in relation to a set of key measures.
Dette bżr imidlertid ikke kržves systematisk for alle foranstaltninger af hensyn til nżdvendigheden af at holde overvgnings-og evalueringsomkostninger p et rimeligt niveau. 
However, this should not be requested systematically for all measures for reasons of keeping the costs of monitoring and evaluation reasonable.
De indikatorer, der er fastlagt i lovgivningen eller af medlemsstaterne, er desuden kun udgangspunktet for en evaluering. Evaluatorerne kan indsamle yderligere oplysninger, f.eks. gennem casestudier. 
Moreover, the indicators as defined in the legislation or by the Member States are only the starting point for an evaluation, The evaluators can collect additional information, for example through case studies.
88 Midtvejsevalueringen gav ikke et godt overblik over gennemfżrelsen af LDPŐerne. 
88 The mid-term evaluation did provide a good overview of the implementation of RDPs.
For flerrige programmer ssom LDPŐerne kan visse resultater (f.eks. bruttovžrditilvžkst) og virkninger imidlertid fżrst vurderes behżrigt og mles et godt stykke tid efter gennemfżrelsen. 
However, for multiannual programmes such as RDPs certain results (e.g. gross value added) and impacts can only be properly assessed and measured after sufficient time since implementation has passed.
89 Overvgnings-og evalueringssystemet for 2014-2020 indeholder en ržkke forbedringer sammenholdt med den fžlles overvgnings-og evalueringsramme (CMEF) for 2007-2013: Đ Midtvejsevalueringerne erstattes af udvidede rlige gennemfżrelsesrapporter med evalueringsresultater. I den fżrste udvidede rlige gennemfżrelsesrapport i 2017 vil der vžre fokus p spżrgsml vedrżrende programstyring, og den anden rapport i 2019 vil indeholde en forelżbig vurdering af LDPŐets virkninger. Đ Medlemsstaterne skal udżve evalueringsaktiviteter i hele programmeringsperioden i overensstemmelse med evalueringsplanen i LDPŐet. 
89 The 2014-2020 monitoring and evaluation system incorporates a number of improvements in comparison with the 2007-2013 CMEF: — Enhanced annual implementation reports (AIRs) incorporating evaluation findings will replace mid-term evaluations. The first AIR in 2017 will concentrate on elements related to programme steering, while the second AIR in 2019 will provide an initial assessment of the impact of the RDPs. — The Member States will be required to carry out evaluation activities throughout the programming period in accordance with the evaluation plan included in the RDPs. — The assessment and reporting of the results and impacts of the policy will be linked more appropriately to the stage of implementation of the RDPs.
Konklusioner og anbefalinger 93 Medlemsstaterne blev opfordret til at medtage de vigtigste landdistrikter, som skulle udvikles, i deres (LDPŐer). 
Conclusions and recommendations 93 The Member States were encouraged to include in their RDPs the most important rural areas to be developed.
ELFUL har gjort det muligt at finansiere investeringer, der i modsat fald muligvis ikke var blevet finansieret. 
The EAFRD has permitted the funding of investments which otherwise might not have been funded.
94 Det er mest hensigtsmžssige at udveksle bedste praksis efterfżlgende, da infrastrukturinvesteringer er mere langsigtede, og da fordelene fżrst vil vise sig p et senere tidspunkt. 
94 Sharing best practices can best be done ex post, since infrastructure investments are of a longer-term nature and their benefits will be shown at a later stage.
Erfaringerne fra den tidligere programmeringsperiode er imidlertid afspejlet i den retlige ramme for 2014-2020. 
However, lessons learnt from the previous programming period are reflected in the legislative framework for 2014-2020.
Det europžiske netvžrk for landdistriktsudvikling fremmer udvekslingen af god praksis blandt medlemsstater og regioner. 
The European Network for Rural Development promotes the sharing of good practices among Member States and regions.
96 Koordineringen skulle sikres p nationalt og/eller regionalt plan. 
96 Coordination was to be ensured at national and/or regional level.
Der er ofte blevet anvendt en integreret tilgang p regionalt og lokalt plan for at optimere EU-medfinansieringen. 
Often integrated approaches at regional and local level have been followed, aiming at optimising the EU co-funding.
97 Interventionerne under LDPŐerne medfinansieres af Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne. 
97 The interventions under the RDPs are co-financed by the Commission and the Member States.
Kommissionens svar 64 98 I programmeringsperioden 2007-2013 blev medlemsstaterne anmodet om at begrunde deres investeringsprioriteter p baggrund af en SWOT-analyse og afdžkning af behov. 
Reply of the Commission 64 98 In the 2007-2013 programming period, the Member States were requested to justify their investment priorities based on a SWOT analysis of needs.
I programmeringsperioden 2014-2020 er bestemmelserne om strategisk programmering og en effektiv koordinering af anvendelsen af forskellige fonde blevet styrket. 
Provisions concerning strategic programming and an effective coordination of the use of different funds have been strengthened in the 2014-2020 programming period.
Risikoen for dżdvžgt skal vurderes fra sag til sag, afhžngigt af den pgžldende investeringstype og de lokale investeringsvilkr. 
The risk of deadweight has to be considered on a case-by-case basis, depending on the type of investments concerned and local investment conditions.
Kommissionens fžlles svar p punkt 99 og 100 Afgržnsningen og komplementariteten er blevet nžrmere beskrevet i programdokumenterne for 2007-2013. 
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 99 and 100 The demarcation and complementarities were detailed in the 2007-2013 programming documents.
Selv om stżtte fra forskellige fonde til den samme interventionstype ikke nżdvendigvis kompromitterer bidragenes mervžrdi, blev dobbeltfinansiering af den samme investering forhindret gennem fastlžggelse af afgržnsningslinjer. 
While the support by different funds to the same type of interventions does not necessarily compromise the added value of the contributions, double funding of the same investment was excluded through the establishment of demarcation lines.
Synergier er blevet fremmet ved at tillade fžlles interventioner finansieret gennem forskellige fonde p visse omrder, og afgržnsningen blev sikret gennem anvendelsen af kriterier ssom finansielle lofter eller fysiske parametre. 
Synergies have been encouraged by allowing joint interventions by different funds in certain areas, while demarcation was ensured through the use of criteria such as financial ceilings or physical parameters.
I programmeringsperioden 2014-2020 var der fokus p komplementaritet og afgržnsning i LDPŐerne. 
For the 2014-2020 programming period, the issue of complementarity and demarcation was raised in the RDPs.
De skaldte Čpositionspapirer fra Kommissionens tje-nestegreneÇ, der udarbejdes for hver medlemsstat, indeholdt ligeledes vejledning om ESI-fondenes koordinerede interventioner. 
Also, the so-called ‘Commission services’ position papers’ drawn up for each Member State provided guidance on the coordinated interventions of the ESIF.
Medlemsstaterne skal sikre komplementaritet, sammenhžng og overensstemmelse med andre EU-instrumenter. 
The Member States have to ensure the complementarity, consistency and conformity with other EU instruments.
Anbefaling 1 a) Denne anbefaling er rettet til medlemsstaterne. 
Recommendation 1 (a) This recommendation is for the Member States.
Anbefaling 1 b) Kommissionen accepterer denne anbefaling og er begyndt at gennemfżre den. 
Recommendation 1 (b) The Commission accepts the recommendation and has started to implement it.
Udveksling af bedste praksis til mindskelse af risikoen for dżdvžgt vil blive fremmet inden for rammerne af det europžiske netvžrk for landdistriktsudvikling. 
Exchange of best practices concerning the mitigation of the risk of deadweight will be promoted through the activities of the European Rural Development Network.
Mekanismer til at sikre bedre komplementaritet og koordinering mellem fonde skal styrkes i programmeringsperioden 2014-2020 gennem partner-skabsaftalerne, hvor medlemsstaterne skal beskrive anvendelsen af ESI-fondene for at sikre komplementaritet og synergier mellem aktiviteterne. 
Mechanisms to ensure better complementarities and coordination between funds have been reinforced in the 2014-2020 programming period through the partnership agreements, where the Member States have to describe the use of ESIF in order to ensure complementarity and synergies of activities.
Spżrgsmlet om komplementaritet og afgržnsning blev ogs taget op i LDPŐerne. 
The issue of complementarity and demarcation was also raised in the RDPs.
Selv om der er blevet taget hensyn til princippet om LDP-ressourcernes additionalitet til nationale midler p programniveau ved at anvende de relevante medfinansieringssatser, vil Kommissionen fortsat fremme effektiviteten af FoU-udgifterne. 
While the principle of additionality of RDP resources to national funds is addressed at programme level by applying the relevant co-financing rates, the Commission will continue to promote efficiency in rural development spending.
Kommissionens svar 65 Anbefaling 1 c) Denne anbefaling er rettet til medlemsstaterne. 
Reply of the Commission 65 Recommendation 1 (c) This recommendation is for the Member States.
Anbefaling 1 d) Kommissionen accepterer denne anbefaling og er begyndt at gennemfżre den. 
Recommendation 1 (d) The Commission accepts this recommendation and has started to implement it.
I Kommissionens forskellige tjenestegrene er der fokus p koordineringen af og komplementariteten mellem EU-fondene p strategisk nationalt og regionalt niveau. 
Coordination and complementarity of EU funds at the level of national/regional strategies is addressed by the different services of the Commission.
Det er imidlertid de nationale og regionale myndigheders opgave at sikre denne koordinering og komplementaritet p foranstaltnings-og projektniveau i forbindelse med gennemfżrelsen af programmerne. 
It is however for national/regional authorities to enforce such coordination/complementarity at measure/ project levels when implementing the programmes.
Kommissionen vil regelmžssigt overvge og vurdere gennemfżrelsen i medlemsstaterne inden for den fastsatte ramme for overvgning og rapportering. 
The Commission will regularly monitor and assess implementation in the Member States within the established framework for monitoring and reporting.
103 Kommissionen har under sine revisioner ligeledes fundet svagheder i medlemsstaternes systemer til vurdering af projektomkostningernes rimelighed. 
103 The Commission's audits have also identified weaknesses in the systems put in place in the Member States to assess the reasonableness of costs.
I nogle tilfžlde er der blevet plagt finansielle korrektioner. 
In some cases, financial corrections have been imposed.
Forbedringen af kontrollen af omkostningernes rimelighed og anvendelsen af offentlige udbud er en prioritet for Kommissionen. 
The improvement of checks on the reasonableness of costs and public procurement is a priority for the Commission.
Der er blevet afholdt kurser om disse emner for forvaltningsmyndighederne og betalingsorganerne, og der er blevet udstedt specifik vejledning. 
Training related to these issues has been delivered for the managing authorities and paying agencies and specific guidance has been issued.
Med hensyn til offentlige udbud er der ved at blive udarbejdet en handlingsplan for alle ESI-fonde og specifik vejledning for aktżrer, kurser og sžrlige websteder. 
As regards public procurement, an action plan for all ESI funds and specific guidance for practitioners, training courses and dedicated webpages are being developed.
Offentlige udbud er en forhndsbetingelse for alle ESI-fonde, og hvis der ikke er tilstržkkelig sikkerhed for, at de eksisterende procedurer og institutioner kan forvalte EU-midler effektivt under overholdelse af transaktionernes lovlighed, kan betalinger til medlemsstaterne suspenderes. 
Public procurement is an ex ante conditionality for all ESI funds and where there is not enough assurance that procedures and institutions in place can manage EU funds in an effective and efficient way, respecting the legality of the transactions, payments to the Member States might be suspended.
104 Selv om indfżrelse af krav om indsendelse af en vedligeholdelsesplan kan anses for at vžre god praksis i forbindelse med visse investeringer, er det ikke et retskrav. 
104 While requiring the submission of a maintenance plan may be considered as a good practice for certain investments, there is no legal obligation to do so.
105 Selv om fastsžttelse af administrative frister kan anses for at vžre god praksis, er der ingen retlige bestemmelser, som bemyndiger Kommissionen til at tvinge medlemsstaterne til at fastsžtte sdanne frister. 
105 While setting administrative deadlines may be considered as a good practice, there are no legal provisions that empower the Commission to force Member States to set such deadlines.
Anbefaling 2 a) Denne anbefaling er rettet til medlemsstaterne. 
Recommendation 2 (a) This recommendation is for the Member States.
Anbefaling 2 b) Kommissionen accepterer denne anbefaling. 
Recommendation 2 (b) The Commission accepts this recommendation.
Kommissionen er ved at gennemfżre de anbefalinger, der blev fremsat i sžrberetning nr. 22/2014, ved at afholde specifikke kurser for forvaltningsmyndighederne og betalingsorganerne, foretage forbedret vurdering af foranstaltningernes verificerbarhed og kontrollerbarhed og fremme brugen af forenklede omkostningsscenarier. 
The Commission is implementing the recommendations made in Special Report No 22/2014 by delivering specific training for the managing authorities and paying agencies, enhanced assessment of the verifiability and controllability of the measures and promotion of the use of simplified cost options.
Endvidere vil de systemer, der er indfżrt for at sikre, at omkostningerne i forbindelse med projekterne er rimelige, blive vurderet ved overensstemmelsesrevisioner. 
Furthermore, the systems in place for ensuring that the costs of the projects are reasonable will be assessed in the framework of conformity audits.
Der vil blive anvendt finansielle korrektioner i tilfžlde af manglende overholdelse. 
Financial corrections will be applied in cases of non-compliance.
Kommissionens svar 66 Anbefaling 2 c) Denne anbefaling er rettet til medlemsstaterne. 
Reply of the Commission 66 Recommendation 2 (c) This recommendation is for the Member States.
Anbefaling 2 d) Denne anbefaling er rettet til medlemsstaterne. 
Recommendation 2 (d) This recommendation is for the Member States.
Kommissionens fžlles svar p punkt 107 og 108 Oplysningerne via overvgnings-og evalueringssystemet var nemmest tilgžngelige i denne fase p grund af finansielle og praktiske begržnsninger. 
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 107 and 108 Information available through the monitoring and evaluation system was the best available at this stage, taking into account financial and practical limitations.
Kommissionen har foreslet en ržkke forbedringer af overvgnings-og evalueringssystemet for programmeringsperioden 2014-2020 under hensyntagen til behovet for at finde en balance mellem fordelene ved overvgning og evaluering og de hermed forbundne omkostninger og administrative byrder. 
The Commission has proposed a number of improvements to the monitoring and evaluation system for the 2014-2020 programming period, while considering the need to find a balance between the benefits of monitoring and evaluation and the costs and administrative burden related to it.
109 Overvgnings-og evalueringssystemet for 2014-2020 indeholder en ržkke forbedringer. 
109 The 2014-2020 monitoring and evaluation system incorporates a number of improvements.
Der vil blive udstedt udvidede rlige gennemfżrelsesrapporter i 2017 og 2019 med evalueringsresultater. 
Enhanced annual implementation reports (AIRs) will be issued in 2017 and 2019, which will incorporate evaluation findings.
I den fżrste rapport vil der vžre fokus p programstyring og i den anden p vurderingen af virkningerne af LDPŐerne. 
The first report will concentrate on the programme steering and the second one on the assessment of the impact of the RDPs.
Medlemsstaterne skal udżve evalueringsaktiviteter i hele programmeringsperioden i overensstemmelse med evalueringsplanen i LDPŐet. 
The Member States will be required to carry out evaluation activities throughout the programming period in accordance with the evaluation plan included in the RDPs.
Vurderingen og rapporteringen af politikkens resultater og virkninger vil blive mere hensigtsmžssigt knyttet til gennemfżrelsesfasen. 
The assessment and reporting on the results and impacts of the policy will be linked more appropriately to the stage of implementation.
Med det forml at underbygge den resultatorienterede politik vil politikken i hżjere grad blive holdt op mod relevante politiske ml. 
To further underpin the result orientation of the policy, its assessment against relevant policy objectives will be strengthened.
Anbefaling 3 a) Kommissionen accepterer denne anbefaling, men i lyset af den begržnsede vžrdi af at vurdere foranstaltninger isoleret mener Kommissionen, at denne vurdering bżr foretages p de fokusomrder, som afspejler politiske ml. 
Recommendation 3 (a) The Commission accepts this recommendation. However, given the limited value of assessing measures in isolation, the Commission is of the opinion that evaluation should be carried out at the level of the focus areas, which reflect policy objectives.
Anbefaling 3 b) Denne anbefaling er rettet til medlemsstaterne. 
Recommendation 3 (b) This recommendation is for the Member States.