natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Her har Socrates-og Ungdom for Europa-programmet (UFE) vžret centrale elementer i Den Europžiske Unions strategi for almen uddannelse og samarbejde p ungdomsomrdet i perioden 1. januar 1995-31. december 1999. 
In this respect, the Socrates and Youth for Europe (YfE) programmes were a key component of the European UnionŐs strategy for education and cooperation in the field of youth during the period from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 1999.
Begge programmer, som landene i Den Europžiske Frihandelssammenslutning (EFTA) og ogs kandidatlandene kan deltage i, indgr som et led i foranstaltningerne til fremme af Den Europžiske Unions udvidelsesproces. 
These two programmes, which are open to the countries of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and the applicant countries, form part of a corpus of measures designed to further the process of enlargement of the European Union.
De er blevet forlžnget, s de džkker perioden 1. januar 2000-31. december 2006. 
They have been extended for the period from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2006.
Der er fastlagt en vejledende finansieringsramme p 1 850 millioner euro til Socrates og p 520 millioner euro til UFE(2). 
Indicative financial allocations of 1 850 million euro and 520 million euro have been set aside for Socrates and YfE respectively (2).
Socrates-programmet og navnlig Erasmus-aktionen har ubestrideligt haft en vžsentlig betydning for de studerende som gruppe. 
The Socrates programme, and the Erasmus action in particular, have undeniably had a major impact on the student population.
819/95/EF) om ivžrksžttelse af Fžllesskabets handlingsprogram Socrates henvises der til Kommissionens grżnbog om indfżrelsen af en europžisk dimension i undervisningen i folkeskolen og ungdomsuddannelserne og til Kommissionens hvid-bog, som var grundlaget for den handlingsplan vedrżrende vžkst, konkurrenceevne og beskžftigelse, Det Europžiske Rd vedtog i 1993. 
(1) The base Decision No 819/95/EC establishing the Community action programme Socrates refers to the CommissionŐs Green Paper on introducing the European dimension of education in schools and to the CommissionŐs White Paper, in the light of which the European Council adopted in 1993 an action plan of growth, competitiveness and employment.
For UFE-programmets vedkommende: jf. afgżrelse nr. 1031/2000/EF af 13. april 2000 (EFT L 117 af 18.5.2000). 
For the Youth for Europe programme, see Decision No 1031/ 2000/EC of 13 April 2000 (OJ L 117, 18.5.2000).
Retsgrundlaget 2. 
Legal framework 2.
Fžllesskabets handlingsprogram Socrates blev oprettet ved Europa-Parlamentets og Rdets afgżrelse nr. 819/95/EF (3) af 14. marts 1995, žndret ved afgżrelse nr. 
The Community action programme Socrates was established by Decision No 819/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) of 14 March 1995 and amended by Decision No 576/98/EC (4) of 23 February 1998.
Det skal bidrage til at udvikle et hżjt uddannelsesniveau og et bent europžisk uddannelsessamarbejdsomrde og henvender sig fżrst og fremmest til de videregende uddannelser (Erasmus) og skoleuddannelserne (Comenius), men omfatter ogs tvžrgende aktioner. 
ÔIntended to contribute to the development of quality educationŐ and an open European area for cooperation in education, it is mainly aimed at higher education (Erasmus) and school education (Comenius) but also includes horizontal activities.
Fžllesskabets handlingsprogram ČUngdom for EuropaÇ (UFE), som ogs blev vedtaget den 14. marts 1995 ved Europa-Parlamentets og Rdets afgżrelse nr. 818/95/EF, er Fžllesskabets primžre instrument til fremme af samarbejdspoli-tikken p ungdomsomrdet og til at Čbidrage til unges uddannel-sesprocesÇ gennem fem aktioner, der navnlig gr ud p udveksling og samarbejdsprojekter igangsat af unge i Fžllesskabets forskellige medlemsstater og ogs i tredjelande (5). 
The Community action programme YfE, which was also adopted on 14 March 1995 by Decision No 818/ 95/EC of the European Parliament and the Council, is the CommunityŐs special instrument for encouraging cooperation policy in the youth field and contributing Ôto the educational process of young peopleŐ by means of five actions involving exchanges and cooperation projects set up by young people from various Community countries, but from third countries as well (5).
Finansieringsrammerne 3. 
Financial allocations 3.
Finansieringsrammen til gennemfżrelsen af Socrates-programmet, der oprindelig var fastsat til 850 millioner euro, blev forhżjet til 920 millioner euro ved afgżrelse nr. 576/98/EF. 
The budget for the implementation of the Socrates programme, initially set at 850 million euro, was increased to 920 million euro by Decision No 576/98/EC.
Finansieringsrammen til gennemfżrelsen af ČUngdom for EuropaÇ-programmet var p 126 millioner euro. 
The budget for the implementation of the Youth for Europe programme amounted to 126 million euro.
Budgetmidlerne til disse to programmer vil til sin tid n op p 998 millioner euro til Socratesprogrammet og 141 millioner euro til ČUngdom for EuropaÇ-programmet, isžr fordi programmerne er blevet bnet for deltagelse af de associerede lande. 
In the end, the budgetary funds allocated to these two programmes will come to 998 million euro and 141 million euro respectively, essentially because of the opening of the two programmes to associated countries.
3 (4) (5) ( ) EFT L 87 af 20.4.1995. 
3 (4) OJ L 87, 20.4.1995.
EFT L 77 af 14.3.1998. Under aktion D (Udvekslinger med tredjelande) kan der ydes stżtte til samarbejde med landene i Centraleuropa, i Samfundet af Uafhžngige Stater (SNG), i Middelhavsomrdet og i Latinamerika. 
(5) OJ L 77, 14.3.1998. () Within the framework of Action D (Exchanges with third countries), cooperation may take place with the countries of central Europe, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), the Mediterranean basin and Latin America.
Aktion B gr ud p europžisk samarbejde om uddannelse af ungdomsledere og aktion C p samarbejde mellem medlemsstaternes forskellige organer. 
Action B provides for European cooperation in the field of training youth workers and Action C cooperation between structures in the Member States.
7.6.2002 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 136/5 Revisionens omfang 4. 
7.6.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 136/5 Scope of the audit 4.
Retten har foretaget revision i Kommissionens tjenestegrene (GD for Uddannelse og Kultur), i det kontor for faglig bistand (KFB), der er ansvarligt for de to programmer, i syv medlemsstater (Tyskland, Spanien, Frankrig, Gržkenland, Italien, Luxembourg og Det Forenede Kongerige), heriblandt de fem stżrste stżttemodtagere, i 27 nationale forvaltningsstrukturer og hos en ržkke endelige modtagere. 
Audits were carried out in the CommissionŐs departments (DG Education and Culture), the TAO common to both programmes, in seven Member States (Germany, Spain, France, Greece, Italy,LuxembourgandtheUnitedKingdom)whichincludedthe five main beneficiaries, in 27 national management structures and on the premises of final beneficiaries.
Revisionen omfattede en undersżgelse af beslutningsprocedurerne i forbindelse med den żkonomiske forvaltning samt af overvgnings-og evalueringsprocedurerne. 
Emphasis was placed on examination of the decision-making procedures relating to financial management, and of monitoring and evaluation.
De udvalgte Socrates-aktioner tegner sig for 76 % af programmets budget og de udvalgte UFE-aktioner for 75 % af budgettet. 
The actions selected for Socrates represent 76 % of this programmeŐs budget, those for YfE covered 75 % of the budget.
BUDGETGENNEMFŻRELSE Socrates 6. Pr. 
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUDGET FOR THE PROGRAMMES Socrates 6.
31. december 1999 var der indget forpligtelser for 992 millioner euro af bevillingerne, dvs. en udnyttelsesgrad p 99 %. Af betalingsbevillingerne var 938 millioner euro anvendt, hvad der svarer til en udnyttelsesgrad p 92 %. 
At 31 December 1999, appropriations amounting to 992 million euro had been committed, i.e. a utilisation rate of 99 %, and payment appropriations amounting to 938 million euro had been utilised, which represents a rate of implementation of 92 %.
Tabel 1 viser udnyttelsen af forpligtelserne og betalingerne fordelt p regnskabsr. 
Table 1 summarises the budgetary implementation of commitments and payments by year.
I alt 54 millioner euro i betalingsbevillinger er bortfaldet. 
Payment appropriations amounting to 54 million euro lapsed.
Ungdom for Europa 7. 
Youth for Europe 7.
Bevillingen til UFE-programmet blev forhżjet, da de associerede lande fik adgang til det. 
Opening the YfE programme to associated countries resulted in the appropriations being increased for the same reason.
De disponible budgetbevillinger androg 141 millioner euro for forpligtelsernes og 135 millioner euro for betalingernes vedkommende. 
The budget appropriations available amounted to 141 million euro for commitments and 135 million euro for payments.
Udnyttelsen af bevillingerne var p 134 millioner euro (95 %) for forpligtelsernes og p 118 millioner euro (87 %) for betalingernes vedkommende. 
Utilisation of appropriations came to 134 million euro for commitments (95 %) and 118 million euro for payments (87 %).
Tabel 2 viser udnyttelsen af forpligtelserne og betalingerne fordelt p regnskabsr. 
Table 2 shows the budgetary implementation of commitments and payments by year.
Afvigelser mellem budgetdatakilderne 8. 
Differences between sources of budgetary information 8.
Undersżgelsen af budgetgennemfżrelsen viste, at der var afvigelser mellem de forskellige datakilder (jf. tabel 3). 
Examination of the implementation of the budget revealed a difference between the various sources of information (see Table 3).
Sledes er de samlede belżb, der er opfżrt i Den Europžiske Unions almindelige budget for gennemfżrelsen af Socrates-programmet, lavere end de belżb, der er opfżrt i forvaltningsregnskabet og balancen (en difference p 51 millioner euro). 
The overall amounts given by the general budget of the European Union in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Socrates programme are thus less than those given by the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet (difference of 51 million euro).
Differencen skyldes, at det belżb, der er opfżrt i forvaltningsregnskabet, er belżbet for de samlede udgifter vedrżrende samtlige deltagende lande, mens der i belżbet i budgettet kun indgr tallene for gennemfżrelsen af tildelingerne i Unionens 15 medlemsstater. 
The difference is explained by the fact that the amount entered in the revenue and expenditure account is for all the expenditure effected for the benefit of all the participant countries, whereas the budget only takes the figures for the part of implementation that corresponds to the allocation for 15 Member States of the Union.
Den fordeling af de finansielle midler p aktionerne, der fremgr af Kommissionens endelige beretning om gennemfżrelsen af Socrates-programmet 1995-1999 (1), omfatter kun EU-medlemsstaterne og ikke samtlige deltagende lande. 
The financial distribution presented in the CommissionŐs final report on the implementation of the Socrates programme (1) is limited to the EU Member States, rather than all the countries participating.
De udnyttede bevillingers fordeling p aktionerne 9. 
Breakdown, by action, of the appropriations used 9.
Tabel 4 viser udnyttelsen af de bevillinger, der er indget forpligtelser for, og deres fordeling p aktionerne med henblik p gennemfżrelsen af Socrates-programmet. 
Table 4 shows the utilisation of the appropriations committed, by action, for the implementation of the Socrates programme.
Tabellen viser, at bestemmelserne i basisafgżrelse nr. 819/95/EF om belżbsgržnserne for de forskellige kapitler blev overholdt, for s vidt angr forpligtelsesbevillingerne. 
It shows that as regards the thresholds applicable to the various chapters the requirements of the base Decision No 819/95/EC have been complied with at the level of the resources to be committed.
Tabel 5 er en oversigt over forpligtelsesbevillingerne til UFE fordelt p de forskellige aktioner. 
Details of the commitment appropriations for YfE by action are contained in Table 5.
I henhold til afgżrelse nr. 818/95/EF om vedtagelse af UFE-programmet skal mindst en tredjedel af bevillingerne til programmets aktion A (aktiviteter inden for Fžllesskabet, der direkte involverer unge) anvendes til gavn for drligt stillede unge. 
Due to the lack of an appropriate breakdown of the accounting classification, it was not possible for the audit to verify whether, in accordance with the terms of Decision No 818/95/EC establishing YfE, at least a third of the appropriations allocated within the framework of the programmeŐs Action A (intra-Community activities directly involving young people) had been used for the benefit of disadvantaged young people.
PROGRAMMERNES KONCEPT Socrates 10. 
THE DESIGN OF THE PROGRAMMES Socrates 10.
Medlemsstaterne er ansvarlige for uddannelsernes indhold, men i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 149 skal Fžllesskabet bidrage til at udvikle et hżjt uddannelses-og erhvervsuddannel-sesniveau og et bent europžisk uddannelsessamarbejdsomrde. 
Although education is the responsibility of the Member States, the Community, under Article 149 of the EC Treaty, must contribute to the development of quality education and training in an open European area for cooperation in education.
Sigtet med Socrates-programmet er at stżtte og, om nżdvendigt, supplere medlemsstaternes indsats og derigennem fremme samarbejdet mellem dem. 
The objective of the Socrates programme is to encourage cooperation between the Member States by supporting their activities and supplementingthemwherenecessary.
Kombinationen af en lang ržkke ml og begreber, der er formuleret for generelt, ssom undervisningens kvalitet eller begrebet EU-borger, og en alt for kompliceret opbygning med i alt 38 aktioner, underaktioner og foranstaltninger uden indbyrdes sammenhžng har resulteret i meget forskellige fortolkninger, og (1) KOM(2001) 75 endelig af 12. februar 2001. 
However, the juxtaposition of numerous objectives and concepts set out in very general terms like quality teaching or European citizenship, in combination with an over-complex structure characterised by a heterogeneous body of 38 different actions, sub-actions and measures, has resulted in interpretations which are at variance with one another and this, in turn, has made (1) COM(2001) 75 final, 12 February 2001.
C 136/6 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 7.6.2002 det har gjort det vanskeligt for medlemsstaterne at samarbejde. 
C 136/6 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 7.6.2002 cooperation between the Member States more complicated.
P omrdet undervisningens kvalitet blev der fżrst ved udarbejdelsen af en fżrste rapport, som Kommissionen forelagde ved afslutningen af Socrates-programmet, udarbejdet kriterier og indikatorer til brug ved evalueringen af niveauet i de forskellige skolefag (1). 
With regard to the quality of teaching, it was only when an initial report wasbeingdrawnupforpresentationbytheCommissionatthe close of the Socrates programme that the criteria and indicators which allow evaluation of the level reached in the various fields relating to school education were produced (1).
Det svžkker ogs det overordnede programkoncept, at man har blandet aktioner, som er defineret ud fra stżttemodtagerkate-gori, videregende uddannelse og skoleuddannelse (kapitel I og II), sammen med andre skaldte tvžrgende aktioner (kapitel III). 
The overall design of the programme also suffers from an approach which combines a presentation based on actions defined according to categories of beneficiary, i.e. higher education and school education (Chapters I and II), with other actions of a hori-zontalnature(ChapterIII).Subdividingthelatterintoascoreof different measures robs the programme of clarity.
Det er i vid udstržkning, fordi konceptet ikke er tilstržkkeligt homogent, at aktionerne indbyrdes ikke er sžrlig komple-mentžre, og at der alt for ofte kun er en teoretisk sammenhžng mellem aktionerne under kapitel I og II og aktionerne under kapitel III. 
This lack of homogeneity in the design largely explains the poor complementarity of the actions with one another and the frequentlyover-theoreticalnatureofthelinksintendedbetween the actions under Chapters I and II and those under Chapter III.
Desuden bżr det fremhžves, at selv om det i henhold til basisafgżrelsen (artikel 6) phviler Kommissionen sammen med medlemsstaterne at sikre, at der er sammenhžng med Fžllesskabets żvrige programmer, bl.a. ved at tilskynde til koordinering af aktiviteterne med rammeprogrammet for forskning, er der ikke fastlagt en procedure for, hvordan en sdan koordinering skal gennemfżres. Derfor er kun enkeltstende aktioner blevet koordineret. 
In addition, it should be emphasised that although the base Decision (Article 6) calls on the Commission, in partnership with the Member States, to ensure overall consistency between this programme and the other Community programmes and, in particular, to encourage coordination of activities with the research framework programme, no procedure was drawn up to organise suchcoordination.Forthisreason,coordinationremained restricted to individual activities.
At fremme ben undervisning og fjernundervisning. 
To encourage open and distance learning.
(1) Kommissionen forelagde den europžiske rapport om kvaliteten af skoleuddannelsen for Rdet (uddannelse og ungdom) i juni 2000. 
(1) The European Report on the quality of school education was submitted by the Commission to the EU Education Council in June 2000.
Den betragtes som et instrument, der skal gżre det nemmere at evaluere skolesystemer, og ligger p linje med konklusionerne fra Det Europžiske Rds mżde i Lissabon den 23. og 24. marts 2000, hvor det blev understreget, at der var behov for kvantitative og kvalitative indikatorer til sammenligning af de bedste praksis. 
Considered to be an instrument to facilitate the evaluation of school systems, it follows on from the conclusions of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000 which had emphasised the necessity of quantitative and qualitative indicators for comparison of best practices.
A. III.1. 
A III.1.
B. III.1. 
B III.1.
C. III.1. 
C III.1.
D. III.1. 
D III.1.
C 136/8 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 7.6.2002 Ungdom for Europa 15. 
C 136/8 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 7.6.2002 Youth for Europe 15.
I afgżrelsen om vedtagelse af UFE-programmet er det fastsat, at ČKommissionen og medlemsstaterne tržffer de foranstaltninger, der er nżdvendige for at bevare og udvikle de organer, der etableres p nationalt plan med henblik p at n mlene for programmet og sikre evaluering og overvgning af de deri fastlagte aktioner samt overholdelse af procedurerne for samrd og udvžl-gelseÇ (artikel 5). 
The Decision establishing the Youth for Europe programme lays down that Ôthe Commission and the Member States shall take the necessary measures to preserve and develop the structures set up at national level for achieving the objectives of the programme, for evaluating and monitoring the actions set out in the programme and for applying consultation and selection mechanismsŐ (Article 5).
Der er imidlertid hverken fastsat bestemmelser om, hvordan dette samarbejde skal gennemfżres i praksis, eller om de forpligtelser, der phviler Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne i den forbindelse. 
The form this cooperation was to take and the respective obligations of the Commission and the Member States were not laid down, however.
UFE-programmets tredje fase havde den styrke, at det forbandt aktioner, som ikke var forbundet i de tidligere faser. 
The Youth for Europe programme, which has now been reworked for the third time, has the advantage of linking actions which were not linked in preceding versions.
Tredje fase af programmet omfattede imidlertid stadig frivilligt arbejde, som samtidig ogs var džkket gennem ivžrksžttelsen af en pilo-taktion og af det sžrlige program Den Europžiske Volontżrtjenesteordning (EVT). 
However, it still contains voluntary service activities which are covered, in parallel, by the launching of a pilot action and the special European Voluntary Service programme.
Det medfżrte risici for overlapninger, men de er blevet afhjulpet gennem det nye program. 
This situation, which presented a risk of overlap, has been rectified with the new programme.
Et af programmets vigtigste ml var at give drligt stillede unge adgang til at deltage. 
One of the main objectives of the programme was to facilitate access to it for disadvantaged young people.
Selv om det var lovgivers udtrykkelige żnske (afgżrelsens artikel 8), blev rammerne for Kommissionens og medlemsstaternes samarbejde med de kompetente internationale organisationer, isžr Europardet, fżrst defineret i november 1998, da der blev indget en samarbejdsaftale med Europardet. 
Despite the intention shown by the legislator (Article 8 of the Decision), the arrangements for cooperation between the Commission and the Member States and the relevant international organisations, and the Council of Europe in particular, were not defined until November 1998, when a cooperation agreement was concluded with the latter.
Ungdom for Europa-programmets ml Programmets vigtigste ml er at bidrage til unges uddannelsesproces gennem fremme af udvekslinger inden for Fžllesskabet. 
Objectives of the Youth for Europe programme The main objective of the programme is to contribute to the education process of young people by developing exchange activities within the Community.
Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne sżrger for, at mindst en tredjedel af de belżb, der afsžttes til aktiviteter inden for Fžllesskabet, der direkte involverer unge, anvendes til gavn for drligt stillede unge. 
Specialattentionshallbepaidtoensuringthatdisadvantagedyoungpeoplehaveaccesstoactivitiesrunundertheprogramme.TheCommissionand the Member States shall ensure that at least one third of the appropriations made available for intra-Community activities directly involving young people are used for the benefit of disadvantaged young people.
Aktion A: Aktion A.I: Aktion A.II: Aktion B: Aktion B.I: Aktion B.II: Aktion C: Aktion D: Aktion E: Aktion E.I: Aktion E.II: Aktionerne under Ungdom for Europa-programmet Aktiviteter inden for Fžllesskabet, der direkte involverer unge Udveksling af unge og unges mobilitet (*) Unges initiativ, kreativitet og solidaritet Aktion A.II.1: Unges initiativer Aktion A.II.2: Volontżrtjeneste Ungdomsledere Stżtte til aktion A (*) Stżtte til europžisk samarbejde om uddannelse af ungdomsledere Samarbejde mellem medlemsstaternes forskellige organer Udvekslinger med tredjelande (**) Informering af unge og undersżgelser p ungdomsomrdet Informering af unge Undersżgelser p ungdomsomrdet Ledsageforanstaltninger: Teknisk bistand, overvgning og evalueringer mv. (*) Decentraliseret aktion. (**) Decentraliseret aktion fra og med 1998. 
ÔYouth for EuropeŐ actions ActionA: Intra-Communityactivitiesdirectlyinvolvingyoungpeople Action AI.: ActionAII.: Action B: Action BI.: Action BII.: Action C: Action D: ActionE: ActionEI.: Action EII.: Youth exchanges and mobility (*) Spiritofinitiative,creativityandsolidarityamongyoungpeople Action A. II.1: Youth initiatives Action A. II.2: Periods of voluntary service Youth workers Support for Action A (*) Support for European cooperation on training youth workers Cooperation between Member StatesŐ structures Exchanges with non-member countries (**) Informationforyoungpeopleandyouthresearch Informationforyoungpeople Youth research Supportingmeasures Technical assistance, monitoring and evaluation activities, etc. (*) Decentralised action. (**) Decentralised action as from 1998.
7.6.2002 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 136/9 FORSINKELSER OG ŽNDRINGER UNDER GENNEMFŻRELSEN 19. 
7.6.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 136/9 DELAYS AND AMENDMENTS TO IMPLEMENTATION 19.