natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I konsekvensanalysen med henblik på revision af slamdirektivet skal der tages stilling til miljømæssige, økonomiske og sociale risici i forbindelse med spredning af slam på jorden. 
The impact assessment for the revision of the Sewage Sludge Directive has to examine the environmental, economic and social risks connected with the land spreading of sewage sludge.
En stramning af grænseværdierne for tungmetaller og indførelse af yderligere grænseværdier for organiske og andre forurenende stoffer er blandt de emner, som vil blive overvejet. 
The tightening of existing limit values for heavy metals and the introduction of further limit values for organic and other contaminants are among the main options that will be considered.
Kommissionen henviser til sine svar på punkt 8, 9 og 12. 
The Commission refers to its replies given on points 8, 9 and 12.
Kommissionen har opstillet en tjekliste for perioden 2007-2013 til intern brug ved vurderingen af større vand-og spildevandsprojek-ter til at analysere deres sammenhæng med reglerne og politikken på miljøområdet. 
For the period 2007–13, the Commission has developed a checklist for internal use during major water and waste water projects appraisal, for assessing consistency with the environmental acquis and policy.
En vejledning og en tjekliste for større projekter er ikke bindende men blot vejledende for medlemsstaterne. 
A guide as well as a checklist for major projects is not binding for Member States but only indicative.
I perioden 2007-2013 tilrettelægger Kommissionen med regelmæssige mellemrum uddannelseskurser i vurdering af vand-og spildevandsprojekter. 
For the period 2007–13, the Commission organises regular internal training sessions on appraisal of water and waste water projects.
43. a) I perioden 2007-2013 forventer projekt-modtagerne at redegøre for den endelige bestemmelse for slammet i ansøgningen, hvilket indebærer, at der skal foretages et indledende skøn over slammets kvalitet og mængde. 
43. (a) For the period 2007–13, project beneficiaries are expected to present the final destination of sludge in the application, which implies a preliminary estimation of the sludge quality and quantity.
43 b) I revisionsperioden (1994-2006) fandtes der på EU-plan kun resultatindikatorer for vandkvalitet for visse typer vand (dvs. drik-kevandsindvinding, badevand). 
43 (b) For the audited period (1994–2006), water quality performance indicators existed at EU level only for certain waters (i.e. drinking water abstraction, bathing waters).
Indikatorerne i samhørighedsfondsvejledningen 2000-2006 kunne derfor ikke anvendes på alle projekter. 
Hence the indicators contained in the Guide to Cohesion Fund 2000–06 could not be applied for all projects.
Der blev først introduceret resultatindikatorer med vandrammedirektivet med mål, der skal fastsættes inden december 2009 og generelt være realiseret inden december 2015. 
Comprehensive performance indicators have only been introduced through the Water Framework Directive, with objectives to be defined by December 2009 and to be achieved, as a rule, by December 2015.
Hvordan det samfinansierede rensningsanlæg siden fungerer, skal ikke vurderes som led i samhørighedspolitikken. 
The proper subsequent operation of the co-funded treatment plant is not in the scope of the evaluation of cohesion policy.
Der stilles endvidere ikke noget retligt krav til medlemsstaterne om rutinemæssigt at levere oplysninger om kvaliteten af det udledte vand, af recipientvandet og om kvaliteten af kloakslammet og den måde, hvorpå det bortskaffes. 
Furthermore, there is no legal requirement for Member States to routinely provide information regarding quality of the discharged water, of the receiving waters and the quality and the nature of the disposal of the sewage sludge.
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 48. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 48.
Med det it-redskab, som for nylig er blevet introduceret, burde den forestående afslutningsprocedure blive lettere og mere gennemsigtig. 
A recently introduced IT tool should make the upcoming closure procedure easier and more transparent.
Der foretages kontrol fra sag til sag, særlig når der har været problemer med projektet. 
A check is done on a case-by-case basis, especially when a project has experienced difficulties.
Der kan forekomme suspension eller annullering af restbetalingen efter, at Kommissionen har modtaget og analyseret slutrapporten. 
Suspension or cancellation of the balance of payment may also occur following the reception and analysis of the final report by the Commission.
Kommissionen henviser til sine svar på punkt 43 b) og 55. 
The Commission refers to its comments on points 43(b) and 55.
Kommissionen er i færd med at vurdere, om der er behov for en revision af lovgivningen om vaske-og rengøringsmidler på baggrund af en alsidig konsekvensanalyse af valgmuligheder og de dermed forbundne omkostninger og fordele. 
The Commission is currently assessing the need for a revision of the detergents legislation, based on the development of a comprehensive impact assessment of options and their costs and benefits.
I perioden 2000-2006 arbejdede Kommissionen for fremme af princippet om, at »forureneren betaler«, bl.a. i et uforbindende dokument om anvendelsen af princippet og en vejledning i cost-benefit-analyse (2002). 
During 2000–06, the Commission made efforts in promoting the ‘polluter pays’ principle, by issuing an indicative paper on the application of the principle and a guide on cost–benefit analysis (2002).
Fra og med 2010 bliver disse principper bindende i medfør af bestemmelserne i vandrammedirektivet. 
From 2010 onwards, these principles will become operational, under the provisions of the Water Framework Directive.
Særberetning nr. 3/2009 — Strukturfondsmidlernes anvendelse til spildevandsrensning i programperioderne 1994-1999 og 2000-2006 
Special Report No 3/2009 — The effectiveness of Structural Measures spending on waste water treatment for the 1994–99 and 2000–06 programme periods
I sådanne tilfælde kan en fremtidsorienteret udformning af anlægget være rentabel, men kan midlertidigt betyde, at rensningsanlæggets kapacitet ikke udnyttes fuldt ud. 
In such cases, a future-oriented design of the treatment plant can be cost-effective, but it might lead temporarily to the treatment plants operating below capacity. (b) The Commission underlines that Member States are responsible for the operation of the treatment plants and their compliance with Community legislation.
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 62. a) Genanvendelse af kloakslam er i mange tilfælde begrænset på grund af slammets beskaffenhed, geografiske omstændigheder og økonomiske betragtninger. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 62. (a) Reuse of sewage sludge is in many cases limited by the quality of the sludge, geographical conditions or economic considerations.
63. a) Kommissionen accepterer, at der i forbindelse med projekter i denne sektor skal foreligge en strategi for forvaltning af kloakslam. 
63. (a) The Commission agrees that projects in this sector should indicate the strategy for the sewage sludge management.
Det sker for projekter, der indgives i perioden 2007-2013. b) I 2007 blev medlemsstaterne anmodet om at fremlægge oplysninger om kloakslampro-duktion med henblik på 5. implementerings-rapport vedrørende direktivet for rensning af byspildevand. Indberetningskravet har ansporet medlemsstaterne til at oprette nationale databaser. c) Kommissionen arbejder på en revision af slamdirektivet på baggrund af en alsidig konsekvensanalyse af valgmuligheder og de dermed forbundne omkostninger og fordele. 
For new projects, submitted during 2007–13, this element is being checked. (b) In 2007, Member States were asked to provide data related to the sewage sludge production, for the preparation of the fifth Implementation Report of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. The requirement to report has encouraged Member States to establish national databases. (c) The Commission is working on a revision of the Sewage Sludge Directive, based on the development of a comprehensive impact assessment of options and their costs and benefits.
Kommissionen skal minde om, at medlemsstaterne har det primære ansvar for at udvælge, implementere og overvåge projekterne. a) Kommissionen har hverken et retsgrundlag eller de nødvendige ressourcer til at foretage en nærmere vurdering. 
The Commission recalls that Member States have the primary responsibility for the selection, implementation and monitoring of the projects. (a) The Commission has neither the legal basis nor the necessary resources to undertake a detailed assessment.
For perioden 2007-2013 er vurderingen af større projekter dog blevet strømlinet, og hvis projekterne ikke opfylder visse minimumskrav, kan de ikke samfinansieres (oplysninger om en strategi for forvaltning af slam). 
However, for the period 2007–13, the appraisal of major projects has been streamlined, and without fulfilling minimum requirements, projects cannot be co-financed (i.e. information on sludge management strategy).
45 b) I perioden 2007-2013 vil Kommissionen i forbindelse med Samhørighedsfonden og EFRU kun skulle træffe afgørelse om større projekter for rensning af byspildevand. 
45 (b) In relation to the period 2007–13, under both the Cohesion Fund and the ERDF, only major urban waste water treatment projects will be subject to individual Commission decisions.
Kommissionen vil generelt ikke have adgang til samme detailoplysninger om gennemførelsen og færdiggørelsen af større projekter som tidligere. 
The Commission will not, in general, have the same level of detail in relation to the implementation and finalisation of major projects as in the past.
65. b) I perioden 2000-2006 arbejdede Kommissionen for at fremme princippet om, at »forureneren betaler«, bl.a. i et uforbindende dokument om anvendelsen af princippet og for at understrege dets betydning i vejledningen for samhørighedspolitikken. 
65. (b) During 2000–06, the Commission made efforts in promoting the ‘polluter pays’ principle, by issuing an indicative paper on the application of the principle and underlining its importance in the Guide to Cohesion Policy.
Vejledning i cost-benefit-analyse (2002) kan også hjælpe medlemsstaterne til at få dækket omkostningerne ind. 
The guide to cost–benefit analysis (2002) provided also Member States with relevant guidance to progress on cost recovery.
Men da disse vejledninger ikke er retligt bindende, kan den kun bede medlemsstaterne om at engagere sig i en strengere anvendelse af princippet. 
However, since those guidances were not legally binding, it could only ask Member States to commit themselves to a strengthened application of the principle.
66. a) Kommissionen har opstillet en tjekliste for perioden 2007-2013 til intern brug ved vurderingen af større vand-og spildevandspro-jekter til at analysere deres sammenhæng med reglerne og politikken på miljøområdet, bl.a. hvad angår kvaliteten af det udledte vand og forvaltning af slam. 
66. (a) For the period 2007–13, the Commission has developed a checklist for internal use during major water and waste water projects appraisal, for assessing consistency with the environmental acquis and policy, including among others the quality of the waters discharged, and sludge management.
Der findes også en række outputindikatorer i de individuelle forslag til kommissionsafgørelser (f.eks. rensningsniveau, anlæggets kapacitet). 
Also, a number of output indicators are included in the individual project Commission’s decisions (i.e. level of treatment, capacity of the plant).
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR c) Kommissionen er i færd med at vurdere, om der er behov for en revision af lovgivningen om vaske-og rengøringsmidler på baggrund af en alsidig konsekvensanalyse af valgmuligheder og de dermed forbundne omkostninger og fordele. d) Den nye vejledning i cost-benefit-analyse af investeringsprojekter (juni 2008) fremhæver den centrale rolle som princippet om, at forureneren betaler, spiller, såvel som princippet om total omkostningsdækning i forbindelse med spildevandsprojekter. 
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION (c) The Commission is currently assessing the need for a revision of detergents legislation, based on the development of a comprehensive impact assessment of options and their costs and benefits. (d) The new guide to cost–benefit analysis of investment projects (June 2008) highlights the central role of the ‘polluter pays’ principle as well as the total cost recovery for waste water projects.
Det er nu et retligt krav i vandrammedirektivet og det vil føre til en bedre fastsættelse af vandpriser på basis af omkostningsdækning fra og med 2010. 
It is now supported by the legal requirements of the Water Framework Directive and will lead to a better water pricing based on cost recovery by 2010.
Den Europæiske Revisionsret Særberetning nr. 3/2009 Strukturfondsmidlernes anvendelse til spildevandsrensning i programperioderne 1994-1999 og 2000-2006 Luxembourg: Kontoret for De Europæiske Fællesskabers Officielle Publikationer 2009 — 45 s. — 21 x 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-246-9 KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 47 Særberetning nr. 
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 3/2009 The effectiveness of Structural Measures spending on waste water treatment for the 1994–99 and 2000–06 programme periods Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2009 — 45 pp. — 21 x 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-250-6 REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 47 Special Report No 3/2009 — The effectiveness of Structural Measures spending on waste water treatment for the 1994–99 and 2000–06 programme periods
SPILDEVAND OG KLOAKSLAM FRA BYOMRÅDER KAN SKADE KVALITETEN AF EUROPAS SØER, FLODER, KYSTVANDE, GRUNDVAND OG JORD. 
THE WASTE WATER AND SEWAGE SLUDGE FROM URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS CAN AFFECT THE QUALITY OF EUROPE’S LAKES, RIVERS, COSTAL WATERS, GROUNDWATERS AND SOILS.
EU HAR DERFOR VEDTAGET EN RÆKKE DIREKTIVER OG HAR OGSÅ MEDFINANSIERET OPFØRELSEN AF RENSNINGSANLÆG FOR BYSPILDEVAND. 
AS A RESULT, THE EU HAS ADOPTED A SERIES OF DIRECTIVES AND HAS ALSO CO FINANCED THE BUILDING OF URBAN WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS.
KOMMISSIONENS ROLLE GENNEMGÅS OGSÅ. 
THE ROLE OF THE COMMISSION IS ALSO EXAMINED.
DEN EUROPÆISKE REVISIONSRET ISBN 978-92-9207-246-9 QJ-AB-09-003-DA-C 
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS ISBN 978-92-9207-250-6 QJ-AB-09-003-EN-C
DEN EUROPŽISKE REVISIONSRET DA DEN EUROPŽISKE UNIONS FŻDEVAREHJŽLP TIL SOCIALT DRLIGT STILLEDE PERSONER: EN VURDERING AF MLENE OG DE ANVENDTE MIDLER OG METODER Sžrberetning nr. 6 2009 ISSN 1831-0796 
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS EN EUROPEAN UNION FOOD AID FOR DEPRIVED PERSONS: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE OBJECTIVES, THE MEANS AND THE METHODS EMPLOYED Special Report No 6 2009 ISSN 1831-0834
Sžrberetning nr. 6 2009 DEN EUROPŽISKE UNIONS FŻDEVAREHJŽLP TIL SOCIALT DRLIGT STILLEDE PERSONER: EN VURDERING AF MLENE OG DE ANVENDTE MIDLER OG METODER (artikel 248, stk. 
Special Report No 6 2009 EUROPEAN UNION FOOD AID FOR DEPRIVED PERSONS: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE OBJECTIVES, THE MEANS AND THE METHODS EMPLOYED (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS
4, andet afsnit, EF) DEN EUROPŽISKE REVISIONSRET 2 DEN EUROPŽISKE REVISIONSRET 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tlf. +352 4398-45410 Fax +352 4398-46410 E-post: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Sžrberetning nr. 
2 EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-45410 Fax +352 4398-46410 E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Special Report No 6 2009 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu).
6 2009 Yderligere oplysninger om EU fs p internet via Europaserveren (http://europa.eu) Bibliografiske data findes bagest i denne publikation Luxembourg: Den Europžiske Unions Publikationskontor, 2009 ISBN 978-92-9207-336-7 doi: 10.2865/23673 Š De Europžiske Fžllesskaber, 2009 Eftertryk tilladt med kildeangivelse Printed in Belgium Sžrberetning nr. 
Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2009 ISBN 978-92-9207-340-4 doi: 10.2865/2420 © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
PROGRAMMLENES DIKOTOMI NR INTERVENTIONSLAGRENE ER LAVE, ER FORBINDELSEN TIL LANDBRUGSUDGIFTERNE SPINKEL FORANSTALTNINGENS SOCIALE ML ER DET DOMINERENDE SAMORDNINGEN MED ANDRE SOCIALPOLITISKE FORANSTALTNINGER SKAL FORBEDRES DE ANVENDTE MIDLER OG METODER: STR MIDLERNE I ET RIMELIGT FORHOLD TIL DE TILSIGTEDE ML, OG ANVENDES DE EFFEKTIVT? 
THE DICHOTOMY OF THE PROGRAMME’S OBJECTIVES WHEN INTERVENTION STOCKS ARE LOW THE LINK WITH AGRICULTURAL EXPENDITURE IS TENUOUS THE SOCIAL OBJECTIVE OF THE MEASURE IS PREDOMINANT COORDINATION WITH OTHER SOCIAL POLICY MEASURES SHOULD BE IMPROVED THE MEANS AND METHODS EMPLOYED: ARE THE MEANS COMMENSURATE WITH THE OBJECTIVES SOUGHT AND ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENTED?
4 I. Fżdevareprogrammet for socialt drligt stillede personer blev indfżrt i 1987. 
4 I. The programme of food aid for deprived persons was first introduced in 1987.
Formlet var, at der skulle frigives produkter fra Fžllesskabets interventionslagre til fordel for velgżrende organisationer til gratis udlevering blandt tržngende personer. 
It was designed to release products that were available in Community intervention stocks to charitable organisations for free distribution to persons in need.
Foranstaltningen har to hovedml: et socialt (at yde vžsentlig stżtte til socialt drligt stillede) og et markedsrelateret (regulering af markederne for landbrugsprodukter gennem en reduktion af interventionslagrene). 
The measure has two main objectives: a social one (to make a significant contribution to the well-being of deprived persons) and a market one (stabilisation of the markets of agricultural products through the reduction of intervention stocks).
Programmets budget var 307 millioner euro i 2008 (for 19 medlemsstater), og det steg til 500 millioner euro for 2009. 
The budget for the programme was 307 million euro in 2008 (for 19 Member States) and is increased to 500 million euro for 2009.
Betalingsorganerne, som var ansvarlige for interventionslagrene i medlemsstaterne, fik ansvaret for at forvalte programmet. 
The paying agencies, responsible for intervention stocks in the Member States, were given responsibility for managing the programme.
P operationelt plan forvaltes programmet af velgżrende organisationer, som modtager og uddeler levnedsmidler til socialt drligt stillede. 
At operational level, the programme is managed by charitable organisations, which receive and distribute the foodstuffs to deprived persons.
Det vžsentlige fald i interventionslagrene i de senere r betyder, at hovedparten af de produkter, der uddeles, skulle opkżbes p markedet (85 % i 2008). 
The significant decline in intervention stocks in recent years means that the bulk of the products for distribution had to be purchased on the market (85 % in 2008).
Revisionen fokuserede navnlig p, om mlene for programmet stadig var gyldige i lyset af den udvikling, som markedet og den sociale situation har gennemget, og p om de midler, der blev stillet til rdighed, var hensigtsmžssige, og p programmets effekt og de administrative og forvaltningsmžssige procedurer. 
The audit focused on the validity of the intended aims in the context of an evolving market and social situation, the adequacy of the means made available, the programme’s impact, and the administrative and management procedures.
V. I begyndelsen var det berettiget, at programmet blev finansieret over udgifterne til den fžlles landbrugspolitik, fordi der blev anvendt produkter fra interventionslagre. 
V. The financing of the programme under CAP expenditure was initially justified because of the use of intervention stocks.
I de senere r, hvor der nžsten ikke har vžret nogen produkter p interventionslagrene, er programmets tilknytning til landbrugsudgifterne imidlertid blevet spinkel. 
However, when intervention stocks were reduced to almost zero in recent years the link of the programme with agricultural expenditure became tenuous.
Deltagelsen i programmet er frivillig, og nogle medlemsstater mener ikke, at foranstaltningen skal finansieres over EGFLŐs budget. 
Participation in the programme is voluntary with some Member States considering that the measure should not be financed from the EAGF budget.
Formlet med foranstaltningen er at afbżde fattigdom, ikke at afskaffe den. 
The measure was designed to alleviate poverty but not to eliminate it.
I denne henseende kan de ressourcer, der stilles til rdighed, kun have en begržnset effekt p den enkelte socialt drligt stilledes situation, idet stżttemodtagerne kun fr, hvad der svarer til et mltid mad om mneden. 
In this regard the resources made available can only have a limited impact on the situation of individual deprived persons, offering on average the equivalent of one meal per month to its beneficiaries.
For at żge foranstaltningens effektivitet er det derfor nżdvendigt at mlrette stżtten mere og sikre, at den koordineres bedre med socialpolitiske tiltag. 
Therefore, in order to enhance its effectiveness, it is necessary to better target the aid and to ensure better coordination with social policy.
De gžldende bestemmelser indskržnker endvidere udvalget af de produkter, der uddeles, samtidig med at de procedurer, der anvendes i hele distribu-tionskžden, resulterer i, at de endelige modtagere behandles forskelligt med hensyn til den mžngde mad, der uddeles pr. person. 
Furthermore, the existing provisions constrain the variety of the products to be distributed, while the procedures applied in the entire distribution chain result in different treatment of final beneficiaries in terms of the quantity of food provided per person.
Sžrberetning nr. 6/2009 Ń Den Europžiske Unions fżdevarehjžlp til socialt drligt stillede personer: en vurdering af mlene og de anvendte midler og metoder RK OE SMU M M I S S I O N E N S SVAR 
Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed ER XE PE CL YU OT I FV ET H E SC UO M M M M AI S R S Y I O N
5 VII. 
5 VII.
P operationelt plan forvaltes programmet af flere tusinde velgżrende organisationer, der primžrt er bemandet af frivillige, og som arbejder med en ustabil mlgruppe, der ikke er let at overvge. Dette forhold frembyder vžsentlige udfordringer i forbindelse med forvaltningen af ordningen. 
The fact that the programme is managed at operational level by thousands of charitable organisations, mainly staffed by volunteers and dealing with an unstable and not easily monitored target population, poses particular challenges for the administration of the scheme.
Overvgnings-og rapporteringssystemerne i Kommissionen og p medlemsstatsniveau skal forbedres, og det samme gžlder metoden for fordeling af de finansielle ressourcer blandt medlemsstaterne. 
Monitoring and reporting systems at Commission and Member States levels have to be improved, as well as the methodology for allocating the financial resources between the Member States.
Endelig er der stor forskel p de udbudsprocedurer, der anvendes i medlemsstaterne, og procedurerne sikrer ikke lige adgang for alle forretningsdrivende i EU og den bredest mulige konkurrence. 
Finally, the tendering procedures employed by the Member States differ considerably and do not ensure equal access to all EU operators and the broadest competition.
Der er derfor en risiko for, at der ikke altid opns de mest fordelagtige betingelser for produkter, der er frigivet fra interventionslagre, eller for de produkter, der er opkżbt p det bne marked. 
Thus there is the risk that best conditions are not achieved always for products withdrawn from intervention stocks or for those purchased on the open market.
Retten vurderer ogs, at den anvendte kompensationsordning er tung og vanskelig at kontrollere. 
It is also considered that the bartering arrangements used are cumbersome and difficult to control.