natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ECU, som skulle betales i henhold til samme beslutning, džkket over 1999-budgettet. 
Due to shortage of appropriations a further ECU 11 million payable under the same Decision was paid from the 1999 budget.
Den 2. oktober 1997 indsendte Spanien en forelżbig liste over betalinger som dokumentation for sin ansżgning om tilskud til veterinžrforanstaltninger i henhold til det forslag, der senere blev Kommissionens beslutning 98/63/EF af 9. december 1997 (3). 
On 2 October 1997, Spain submitted a provisional list of payments in support of its claim for financial aid for veterinary measures under the proposal that later became Commission Decision 98/63/EC of 9 December 1997 (3).
Ansżgningen džkkede de fżrste 57 udbrud i Catalonien, Castilien-Leon, Murcia og Andalusien. 
This covered the first 57 outbreaks in Catalonia, Castilla y Len, Murcia and Andaluca.
For at f udbetalt tilskuddet skulle Spanien i henhold til beslutningen forelžgge en epidemiologisk rapport om hvert udbrud og hver kontaktbedrift samt en finan-sieringsrapport. 
According to the Decision, in order to receive the advance, Spain had to submit an epidemiological report for each and every outbreak and contact holding and a financial report.
Den 16. juni 1998 indsendte Spanien en ČendeligÇ liste sammen med żvrige dokumenter, der kržves i henhold til beslutningen. 
On 16 June 1998, a ÔfinalŐ list was submitted together with other documents required under the terms of the Decision.
I stedet for at vente til al dokumentationen forel, mente Kommissionen, at den havde tilstržkkeligt grundlag til at udbetale et forskud p 4 mio. ECU i januar 1998, som blev konteret 1997-budgettet. 
Rather than wait until all the supporting documentation had been submitted, the Commission considered it had sufficient grounds to pay a ECU 4 million advance in January 1998 which was charged to the 1997 budget.
Kommissionen kan eventuelt nžgte at betale op til 6,6 mio. ECU vedrżrende bestemte foranstaltninger, som den ikke mener er stżtteberettigede (jf. punkt 51). 
The Commission may refuse up to ECU 6,6 million in connection with certain measures it regards as ineligible (see paragraph 51).
(1) EFT L 224 af 18.8.1990, s. 
(1) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p.
(2) Kommissionens beslutning 1999/18/EF af 22. december 1998, EFT L 6 af 12.1.1999, s. 
(2) Commission Decision 1999/18/EC of 22 December 1998 (OJ L 6, 12.1.1999, p.
(3) EFT L 16 af 21.1.1998, s. 
(3) OJ L 16, 21.1.1998, p.
23.3.2000 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 85/15 42. 
23.3.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 85/15 42.
76/97 af 17. januar 1997 (1). I perioden fra december 1993 til marts 1994 blev der slagtet 90 106 svin i regionen omkring Damme i Tyskland. Denne foranstaltning blev oprindeligt anmeldt som en veterinžrforan-staltning, men Fžllesskabet afviste at finansiere den, fordi ikke alle kriterierne for en sdan foranstaltning var overholdt. 
The Guarantee Fund expenditure includes a charge of ECU 6,8 million to the 1997 budget as a result of Commission Regulation (EC) No 76/97 of 17 January 1997 (1). Initially the slaughter of 90 106 pigs in the Damme region of Germany between December 1993 and March 1994 was presented as a veterinary measure but was rejected for Community financing because not all of the criteria for such measures had been met.
I henhold til forordningen behandles opkżbet af 63 074 af disse svin (70 %) som Čundtagelsesforanstaltninger til stżtte for markedetÇ, som skal finansieres over fžllesskabsbudgettet, dvs. 2 mio. ECU mere, end det ville have kostet, hvis opkżbet var blevet godkendt som en veterinžrforanstaltning. 
Under this Regulation the purchase of 63 074 of these pigs (70 %) is treated as Ôexceptional market support measuresŐ to be borne by the Community budget, i.e. ECU 2 million more than it would have cost had it been accepted as a veterinary measure.
Lignende praksis blev anvendt i Belgien i januar 1996 (2) i forbindelse med godtgżrelse for opkżb af 40 633 svin i december 1993. Retten kritiserede denne fremgangsmde i rsberetningen for regnskabsret 1995 (punkt 3.26). 
A similar practice had been adopted in respect of Belgium in January 1996 (2) for compensation paid for the purchase of 40 633 pigs in December 1993: the Court criticised this procedure in its 1995 Annual Report (paragraph 3.26).
Det er ikke klart, hvorfor der gik endnu et r, fżr man nede frem til samme konklusion for Tysklands vedkommende. 
It is not clear why it took a further year to reach the same conclusion for Germany.
Kommissionen henviste i sit svar til den grzone, der eksisterer mellem veterinžr-og mar-kedsstżtteslagtning. 
The reply given by the Commission referred to the grey area between veterinary and market support slaughtering.
Problemet med grzonen er endnu ikke lżst, og det har givet anledning til megen debat mellem Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne. 
The problem of the grey area remains and is the cause of much debate between the Commission and the Member States.
MEDLEMSSTATERNES GENNEMFŻRELSE AF FORANSTALTNINGERNE Veterinžrforanstaltninger 1997/98-epidemiens oprindelse 43. 
IMPLEMENTATION BY MEMBER STATES Veterinary measures Origin of the 1997 to 1998 epidemic 43.
Epidemien startede i 1996 i Paderborn i Tyskland. 
The epidemic started in 1996 in Paderborn in Germany.
Den berżrte producent havde licens til at behandle kżkkenaffald, men for at spare penge varmede han ikke affaldet op til sdanne grader, at virus blev żdelagt. 
The producer concerned had a swill licence, but in order to save money he did not heat the swill sufficiently to kill off the virus.
Der er rejst tiltale mod de to parter, der mistžnkes for at vžre ansvarlige for udbruddet af klassisk svinepest. 
Charges have been brought against the two parties suspected of being responsible for the outbreak of CSF.
Desuden ivžrksatte anklagemyndigheden i Paderborn undersżgelser af en dyrlžge, som blev beskyldt for at sprede svinefeber-virus, fordi han ikke havde truffet tilstržkkelige forholdsregler ved behandlingen af svin p forskellige bedrifter. 
In addition, the Paderborn Public ProsecutorŐs Office opened preliminary criminal proceedings against a veterinary surgeon who was accused of spreading the swine fever virus due to inadequate precautions in the course of treatment of pigs on various farms.
Fra Tyskland spredte virus sig til Nederlandene (der findes ingen beviser p, hvordan dette skete) og derfra til Belgien og Spanien p grund af transport af smittede dyr (3). 
From Germany the virus spread to the Netherlands (no proof of method) and thence to Belgium and Spain via the movement of infected animals (3).
I Spanien var der indtil februar 1997 ikke registreret tilfžlde af klassisk svinepest i nžsten ti r. I perioden 1.Đ 24. februar 1997 importerede Spanien ca. 220 000 smgrise og 19 000 voksne svin fra Nederlandene. 
In Spain no cases of CSF had been recorded for almost 10 years until February 1997. During the period 1 to 24 February 1997, some 220 000 piglets and 19 000 adult pigs were imported (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 76/97 of 17 January 1997 (OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p.
(2) Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 151/96 af 29. januar 1996, EFT L 23 af 30.1.1996, s. 
74). (2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 151/96 of 29 January 1996 (OJ L 23, 30.1.1996, p.
9. (3) Ifżlge oplysninger fra Fžllesskabets referencelaboratorium for klassisk svinepest i Hannover. de smitteramte regioner i Nederlandene (134 000 svin). 
(3) Information from Community CSF Reference Laboratory. from the Netherlands. Of the 354 consignments concerned, 212 originated in affected regions of the Netherlands (134 000 pigs).
Animo-nettet fungerede ikke i perioden 1. januar 1997 til 17. februar 1997. Mange af de importerede dyr kunne derfor ikke spores af de spanske myndigheder (jf. punkt 26). 
The Animo system did not work during the period 1 January 1997 to 17 February 1997, it was therefore not possible for the Spanish authorities to trace a large number of the animals imported (see paragraph 26).
Man identificerede imidlertid to bedrifter, som havde modtaget sdanne svin, og besžtningerne blev slet ned som en forebyggende foranstaltning. P den ene af bedrifterne fandt nedslagningen sted den 24. februar, men der foreligger ingen dokumentation herfor. 
Two farms were however identified as having received such animals and the herds were killed as a precautionary measure, although there is no documentary evidence to support the action taken on 24 February on one of the farms.
Der blev fżrste gang anmeldt mistanke om svinepest den 14. april 1997, men Kommissionen antager, at den klassiske svinepestvirus var aktiv i Spanien fra februar til april 1997, uden at det blev opdaget. 
Although the first suspicion was recorded on 14 April 1997, the Commission concludes that the CSF virus was active in Spain from February to April 1997 without being detected.
De fżrste to udbrud fandt sted p bedrifter ejet af samme selskab som den ene af de to bedrifter, hvor der blev foretaget forebyggende nedslagning i februar. 
The first two outbreaks occurred on holdings belonging to the same group as one of the two farms cleared in February.
Dette selskab bżr efter Kommissionens mening i vidt omfang drages til ansvar for spredningen af klassisk svinepest i Spanien. 
This group, according to the Commission, must be held responsible to a large extent for the spread of CSF in Spain.
Der forekom udbrud p fem af dette selskabs bedrifter, og 13 gange blev der foretaget forebyggende nedslagninger p sel-skabets bedrifter. Selskabet har fet udbetalt i alt 9,2 mio. 
The group experienced five outbreaks and 13 preventive slaughter operations and received a total of ECU 9,2 million from Community funds.
Det fżrste udbrud i Belgien blev bekržftet den 30. juni 1997. 
The first Belgian outbreak was confirmed on 30 June 1997.
Da der er mistanke om, at producenten har anmeldt sygdommen for sent, har myndighederne af forsigtighedsgrunde besluttet at halvere godtgżrelserne, og der er indledt disciplinžr-sag mod producentens dyrlžge. Producenten har anlagt sag. 
Because the farmer is suspected of late notification of the disease, the authorities prudently decided to impose a 50 % cut on the compensation paid and disciplinary procedures have been started against the farmerŐs veterinarian. The farmer has taken legal action.
Forebyggende nedslagning 46. 
Preventive killing 46.
Der er ikke fastsat noget krav om, at medlemsstaterne skal foretage forebyggende nedslagning, men hvis de gżr det, skal foranstaltningen bde teknisk og videnskabeligt set vžre velbegrundet. 
Member States are not required to use preventive killing but if they do so, the policy should be soundly based from both the technical and scientific points of view.
Belgien og Tyskland gjorde brug af forebyggende nedslagning under en tidligere epidemi, og det viste sig at vžre en temmelig effektiv metode i omrder med hżj koncentration af svinebesžt-ninger. 
Belgium and Germany made use of preventive killing during an earlier epidemic and it was found to be one of the more effective ways of tackling the problem in high-density areas.
Under 1997/98-epidemien valgte Spanien og Nederlandene at foretage forebyggende nedslagning af denne grund. I Tyskland mente man ikke, at denne metode var praktisk gennemfżrlig. Belgien anvendte artikel 6 i Rdets beslutning 90/424/EŻF og ivžrksatte nedslagningen p grund af faren for smitte fra svine-pestramte bedrifter i tilgržnsende omrder i Nederlandene. 
With regard to the 1997 to 1998 epidemic, Spain and the Netherlands chose to make use of preventive killing for this reason; in Germany it was not considered as practicable, whereas Belgium applied it in the context of Article 6 of Council Decision 90/424/EEC to deal with the threat posed by CSF on neighbouring farms in the Netherlands.
Myndighederne sżgte hermed at begržnse risikoen for spredning af sygdommen til omkringliggende bedrifter. I februar blev svinene p 26 bedrifter slet ned (26 000 svin), og det blev senere konstateret, at tre af disse bedrifter havde vžret ramt af svinepest (to af disse udbrud skyldtes kontakt med nabobedrifter). 
From the beginning of the CSF epidemic the Dutch authorities adopted a policy of preventive clearing of farms within one kilometre of the first two confirmed outbreaks in order to reduce the risk of the disease spreading to surrounding farms. In February 26 farms were cleared (26 000 pigs) three of which were later found to have been outbreaks (two classified as neighbourhood contacts).
De sagkyndige havde delte meninger, nogle gik ind for forebyggende nedslagning, og andre var imod. 
Scientific opinion was divided at the time, some supported the policy of preventive killing, others were against it.
Den 14. februar besluttede de nederlandske myndigheder efter rd fra nationale sagkyndige at indstille den forebyggende nedslagning med den begrundelse, at den hindrede indsamling af vigtige epidemiologiske oplysninger. Forebyggende nedslagning blev genoptaget to mneder senere. 
On 14 February, on the basis of advice given by national experts, the Dutch authorities decided to suspend preventive killing on the grounds that it was obstructing the collection of important epidemiological information; preventive killing was resumed two months later.
I denne periode blev der gennemfżrt foranstaltninger til stżtte for markedet, hvorunder der blev opkżbt 690 000 dyr. 
During this period market support measures were in operation, under which 690 000 animals were bought up.
C 85/16 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 23.3.2000 48. 
C 85/16 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23.3.2000 48.
I marts 1997 vidste man, at 39 bedrifter mtte vžre blevet inficeret allerede i begyndelsen af februar (konklusionen af en epidemiologisk undersżgelse). 
By March 1997, it was known that 39 farms must already have been infected in early February (conclusion of epidemiological investigation).
Af de 1 182 bedrifter, hvis besžtninger blev slet ned, blev 67 senere klassificeret som smit-teramt. 
Of the 1 182 farms preventively cleared 67 were later classified as outbreaks.
Fżrst den 12. maj 1997 blev foranstaltningen udvidet til den żnskede radius p 1 km. 
It was not extended to the desired one kilometre radius until 12 May 1997.
En million svin blev slet ned under denne foranstaltning. 
A million pigs were killed under the preventive killing measure.
En simulering foretaget af Landbouwuniversiteit i Wageningen (1) viser, at hvis den forebyggende nedslagning var blevet opretholdt fuldt ud, ville man have kunnet begržnse nedslagningen af besžtninger til langt fžrre bedrifter, og antallet af udbrud ville sandsynligvis have ligget p omkring 70. 
According to a simulation carried out by the Landbouwuniversiteit in Wageningen (1), had a policy of preventive killing been rigorously maintained, far fewer farms would have had to be preventively cleared and the number of outbreaks would probably have been around 70.
P dette grundlag ville de samlede godtgżrelsesomkostninger ved denne foranstaltning have vžret 135 mio. 
On this basis the total associated compensation costs would have been ECU 135 million lower and subsequent market support costs would have been lower.
Kommissionen og Retten deler den opfattelse, at nr der fżrst er truffet afgżrelse om at anvende forebyggende nedslagning, bżr foranstaltningen gennemfżres konsekvent, og at de nederlandske myndigheders beslutning om at indstille den har haft konsekvenser for sygdommens udvikling og fżlgelig ogs żget udgifterne. 
The Commission and the Court share the view that once a policy of preventive killing has been adopted, it should be consistently applied and that the Dutch decision to suspend it has had an impact on the development of the disease and has consequently increased expenditure.
I Spanien vedtog lokale eksperter p svinepestomrdet p et mżde den 7. maj 1997, at samtlige svin bortset fra avlsdyr (sżer og orner) p alle bedrifter inden for en radius p 250 m omkring et smitteramt omrde skulle sls ned. 
In Spain a decision was taken on 7 May 1997 at a local ÔCSF expertsŐ meeting whereby all farms within a radius of 250 metres of an outbreak were to be cleared of all pigs except reproductive animals (sows and boars).
Hver uge skulle avlsdyrenes temperatur kontrolleres af en dyrlžge, men det fremgik af Kommissionens kontrol, at denne dyrlžgekontrol ikke var gennemfżrt systematisk. 
Weekly veterinary checks on the animalsŐ temperature were required, but the CommissionŐs inspection revealed that this was not systematically carried out.
Ca. 20 % (6,6 mio. ECU) af de samlede godtgżrelser for veterinžrudgifter, som Spanien har anmeldt, vedrżrer forebyggende nedslagninger af dele af besžtningerne. 
Some 20 % (ECU 6,6 million) of the total veterinary compensation claimed by Spain relates to ÔpartialŐ preventive killing, approximately half of this was paid to producers who later received compensation under market support measures.
Manglende destruktionskapacitet betżd, at myndighederne ikke kunne efterkomme producenternes żnske om at sžlge dyrene under markedsstżtteforanstaltningerne, og der blev derfor bnet 11 kommunale grave til nedgravning af kroppene (i alt 140 000 svin blev nedgravet i disse grave). 
Due to a lack of rendering capacity the authorities were unable to meet the demand from producers to sell animals under the market support measure, so they decided to open 11 municipal pits in which to bury the carcases (in all some 140 000 pigs were buried in these pits).
Dette betżd, at det, der skulle have vžret en markedsstżtteforanstaltning, ikke kunne behandles som sdan, og at den blev finansieret som en ČforebyggendeÇ veterinžrforanstaltning. 
This meant that what would have been a market measure could not be treated as such and was financed as a veterinary measure and labelled ÔpreventiveŐ.
Producenterne fik udbetalt mere under sidstnžvnte foranstaltning. 
Producers were paid more under the latter system.
Desuden blev nedslagningerne klassificeret forskelligt, dvs. som veterinžrforanstaltninger den ene dag og som markeds-(1) Bilag 8 til universitetets endelige evalueringsrapport (marts 1998). foranstaltninger den anden. 
Moreover operations on successive days were treated differently Ń veterinary one day, market the (1) Annex 8 to Final Evaluation Report by LNV (March 1998). next.
De spanske myndigheder hžvder, at antallet af udbrud faldt hurtigt som fżlge af nedslagningen af dele af besžtningerne, men antallet af udbrud var allerede stžrkt faldende, fżr foranstaltningen blev indfżrt. 
The Spanish authorities claim that the number of outbreaks declined rapidly as a result of the introduction of the partial slaughter policy, but the number of outbreaks was already in steep decline before the measure was introduced.
Forebyggende nedslagning af dele af besžtningerne har vist sig at vžre dyrere, i mange tilfžlde ville det have vžret langt billigere at slagte hele besžtningen som en forebyggende foranstaltning i stedet for at slagte en del af besžtningen og senere opkżbe dyrene under markedsstżtteforanstaltninger. 
Partial preventive killing has proved more expensive, in many cases it would have been far cheaper to slaughter the entire herd as a preventive measure rather than to partially clear the farm and later to buy up animals under market measures Ń saving ECU 300 per sow.
Retten deler Kommissionens alvorlige tvivl om, hvorvidt de udgifter, der er ansżgt om stżtte til, er stżtteberettigede. 
The Court shares the CommissionŐs serious doubts about the eligibility of expenditure claimed under this measure.
I Belgien anses forebyggende nedslagning for at vžre en effektiv metode til at reducere risikoen for smittespredning, og denne metode anvendes nu altid. 
In Belgium, preventive killing is considered to be an effective way of reducing the risk of the disease spreading and has become standard policy.
Alle svin p bedrifter inden for en radius p 1 km omkring et udbrud sls ned. Besžtningerne p seks bedrifter tžt ved gržnsen til Nederlandene blev slet ned som en forebyggende foranstaltning (3 647 svin). 
All pigs on farms within a radius of one kilometre of an outbreak are killed: six farms (3 647 pigs) close to the Dutch border were preventively cleared.
Denne type foranstaltning gennemfżres i henhold til artikel 6 i Rdets beslutning 90/424/EŻF. 
This type of measure is foreseen under Article 6 of Council Decision 90/424/EEC.
Belgien har imidlertid ogs foretaget ČdelviseÇ, forebyggende nedslagninger i henhold til artikel 6 i Rdets direktiv 80/217/EŻF, hvor der ikke udtrykkeligt henvises til denne form for forebyggende nedslagning. 
However, Belgium has also made use of partial preventive killing under Article 6 of Council Directive 80/217/EEC which does not explicitly refer to partial preventive killing.
Partier af svin, der muligvis var smittede, blev slet ned Ń nemlig alle svin importeret fra Nederlandene (16 000) og sżer (100) insemineret med sžd, der var importeret fra Nederlandene, og som muligvis var inficeret. 
Batches of risk animals Ń those imported from the Netherlands (16 000) and sows (100) inseminated with suspect semen imported from the Netherlands Ń were killed.
P grundlag af en formodning om, at pestvirus fżrst havde bredt sig til Nederlandene efter den 15. januar 1997, blev det besluttet, at dyr, der var importeret efter denne dato, skulle behandles som muligvis smittede dyr. 
Based on the assumption that the virus had not spread in the Netherlands before 15 January 1997, it was decided that imports after this date should be treated as risk animals.
Imidlertid blev kun de partier svin slet ned, der stammede fra omrder, hvor der var mistanke om svinepest. Andre partier, der blev transporteret i samme lastvogn, men som stammede fra svinepestfrie omrder i Nederlandene, blev ikke slet ned. 
However, only the batches of pigs originating in suspect areas were killed other batches that were transported on the same lorry but originating from a CSF-free area in the Netherlands were not killed.
Godtgżrelse 53. 
Compensation 53.
I Nederlandene indfżrte myndighederne faste godtgżrelses-satser for nogle svinekategorier, men almindeligvis fulgte vurderingsmžndene ikke disse satser. 
In the Netherlands standard compensation rates were set by the authorities for some categories of pig but these were generally overridden by the valuer.
For visse kategorier af bedrifter havde de nederlandske myndigheder fastsat stżttesatsen for sżer p grundlag af en bestemt sats pr. so plus et formodet antal smgrise (4, 73). 
For certain categories of farms, the rate of aid payable for sows fixed by the Dutch authorities was based on a rate per sow plus an assumed number of 4,73 piglets.
Dermed fik nogle producenter udbetalt godtgżrelse for mange flere smgrise, end der var p bedriften p det tidspunkt, hvor dyrene blev slet ned. 
This led to some producers being paid compensation for many more piglets than were on farm at the time of killing.
I et tilfžlde konstaterede Retten, at en producent fik udbetalt godtgżrelse for 1 272 flere smgrise, end han var i besiddelse af. 
In one of the cases examined by the Court, one producer was effectively paid for 1 272 piglets more than he had.
Kommissionen har beregnet, at der blev udbetalt uberettiget godtgżrelse for i alt 175 000 smgrise. Finansielt ville det have betydet en merudgift p fžllesskabsbudgettet p 10,7 mio. 
The Commission has calculated that producers were unduly paid for 175 000 piglets the financial consequences of which would have been an additional charge to the Community budget of ECU 10,7million had not this expenditure been rejected by the Commission.
Kommissionen har ogs bevis for, at nogle af disse ČmanglendeÇ smgrise kan vžre blevet solgt under foranstaltninger til stżtte for markedet, kort tid fżr sżerne blev slet ned i forbindelse med forebyggende nedslagning. 
The Commission also has evidence that some of these ÔmissingŐ piglets may have been sold under market measures shortly before the sows were eliminated under preventive killing.
I disse tilfžlde har producenterne i realiteten fet godtgżrelse to gange for de samme smgrise. 
In such cases the producers concerned were effectively compensated twice for the same piglets.
23.3.2000 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 85/17 55. 
23.3.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 85/17 55.