natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Fra og med 1. februar 1995 er forskellen p 20,75 % mellem den ČgrżnneÇ ecu og budget-ecuen afskaffet, og belżbet forhżjes med denne difference. lige markedspriser i hver medlemsstat. 
From 1 February 1995 onwards the existing difference of 20,75 % between the ÔgreenŐ ecu and the budgetary ecu has been abolished by increasing the amount by the same difference.
(2) Den anslede indkomst efter reformen er kornproduktionen i hvert produktionsr multipliceret med de gennemsnitlige producentpriser i samme produktionsr (enhedsvžrdier). 
(2) The estimated revenue after the reform is the quantities of cereals for each marketing year multiplied by the average producersŐ prices of the marketing year (unit values).
(3) Udgifterne pr. produktionsr minus valutaeffekten og ensilagestżtten. 
(3) Expenditure per marketing year before currency effect and net of the special aid for silage.
(4) Agromonetžre omkostninger. 
(4) Agrimonetary cost.
Kilde: Alle basisdata stammer fra Eurostat eller Kommissionen, GD VI. priserne fżr reformen og de nye indikativpriser (jf. punkt 4.16), og derfor oversteg den arealstżtte, der i den sidste ende blev udbetalt, globalt set det faktiske indtžgtstab i kornsektoren med ca. 13 100 mio. ECU (35) (jf. tabel 8). 
Source: All basic data are from Eurostat or from the Commission, DG VI. amount of area aid finally paid was higher at a global level than the true amount of income loss in the cereals sector by about ECU 13 100 million (35) (see Table 8).
Retten har allerede ppeget dette fžnomen i rsberetningen for regnskabsret 1996 (36). 
The Court has already highlighted this phenomenon in its Annual Report concerning the financial year 1996 (36).
Dette betyder ikke, at sdanne udbetalinger ud over de faktiske indkomsttab var regelstridige, for forordningen indeholdt ikke bestemmelser om, at godtgżrelserne skulle justeres, s de afspejlede de gžldende markedspriser i stedet for den tidligere fastsatte indikativpris. 
This does not mean that such payments in excess of income losses were irregular since the Regulation had not foreseen a mechanism to adjust the amounts of compensation paid to reflect actual market prices rather than the previously set target price.
Stigningen i kornbudgettet svarer ikke desto mindre stort set til de belżb, hvormed de udbetalte godtgżrelser oversteg de faktiske indkomsttab. 
Nevertheless, the levels of compensation paid in excess of actual income losses account for the greater part of the increase in the cereal budget.
Da der kunne ses bort fra alle andre faktorer, som indvirker p landbrugernes indkomster fra korn (jf. punkt 4.32, litra b) og c)), kunne man blot ved at beregne de žndringer i landbruger-(35) Kommissionen anslr en endnu stżrre overkompensation p ca. 17 000 mio. ECU. 
As all other factors influencing farm income from cereals could be eliminated (see paragraphs 4.32(b) and (c)), a calculation to determine whether area aid compensated for the losses for (35) The Commission estimates an even higher over-compensation of about ECU 17 000 million.
Kommissionen har faktisk anslet en overkompensation p 8 500 mio. ECU for femrsperioden 1993/94-1996/97. Hertil skal lžgges effekten af afskaffelsen af medansvarsafgiften, som for firersperioden 1993/94-1997/98 svarer til yderligere 8 500 mio. 
Indeed the Commission has estimated for the four year period 1993/1994 to 1996/1997 an over-compensation of ECU 8 500 million to which it is necessary to add the abolition of the co-reponsability levy effect representing, for the five year period 1993/94 to 1997/98, another ECU 8 500 million (see replies of the Commission).
ECU (jf. Kommissionens svar). (36) Rettens rsberetning for regnskabsret 1996, EFT C 348 af 8.11.1997, kapitel 3, punkt 3.31. nes indkomster, der skyldtes prisnedsžttelser, afgżre, om arealstżtten godtgjorde de tab, den ifżlge hensigten skulle godtgżre. a) Landbrugernes indkomst fra kornproduktion blev fastsat p grundlag af en evaluering af resultatet for hvert r efter reformen i henhold til Eurostats enhedsvžrdier for hvert land og hver type korn. 
(36) The Court of AuditorsŐ Annual Report concerning the financial year 1996, Chapter 3, paragraph 3.31 (OJ C 348, 8.11.1997). which it was intended could be limited to the differences in market revenue resulting from price reductions: (a) the market returns on cereal production were obtained by valuing the output for each year after the reform according to EurostatŐs unit values for each country and each type of cereal; the use of unit values has the advantage of removing inconsistencies which would otherwise result when using directly raw national price statistics; (b) the actual market returns on cereals, calculated in this manner were compared with the market returns that would have been received had prices stayed at their pre-reform levels in each Member State; this method takes account solely of changes in market revenue due to price changes, and the aggregate differences thereby derived provide the basis for compensation within the meaning of the RegulationŐs objective; (c) the differences between market returns at pre-reform prices and at current prices were compared on a year-by-year and Member State-by-Member State basis with the amounts of area aid actually paid; increases in the aid arising from the
1765/92, som den har fremsat som et led i Agenda 2000, ikke lžngere udtrykket ČgodtgżrelseÇ, men kun arealbetalinger. 
The amendment to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 proposed in the CommissionŐs Agenda 2000 no longer uses the term Ôcompensatory paymentŐ, but merely area-aid payments.
Satsen for disse betalinger er fastsat til det halve af det belżb, hvormed interventionsprisen vil vžre nedsat efter udlżbet af den periode, hvor reformbestemmelserne anvendes fuldt ud. 
The compensation rate of these payments has been fixed at half of the value of the reduction in the intervention price once the ÔcruiseŐ period has ended.
Formelt vil det ikke lžngere vžre korrekt at anvende termen ČgodtgżrelseÇ, nr den nye stżttesats er blevet indfżrt. 
In formal terms it will no longer be correct to use the term ÔcompensationŐ, once the new aid rate has been introduced.
Indkomstfordelingen p kornproducenterne 4.37. 
Distribution of income from cereal growing 4.37.
Godtgżrelsesordningen var baseret p historiske basisarea-ler, historiske gennemsnitlige udbytter, en historisk gennemsnitlig enhedsinterventionspris og en enhedsindikativpris for alle kornsorter, som blev fastsat for den trerige overgangsperiode. 
The concept of compensation was based on historical base areas, historical average yields, a single historical average intervention price and a single target price for all cereals fixed for the three-year transitional period.
En godtgżrelsesordning, som ikke omfatter differentieret stżtte efter bedriftens stżrrelse eller udbytte, vil naturligvis ikke forbedre forholdene for de sm producenter i kornsektoren. 
It is evident that a compensation system which does not differentiate support according to farm size or yield does nothing to improve the position of smaller producers in the cereals sector.
Markedsprisernes indflydelse 4.38. 
The influence of market prices 4.38.
Eftersom markedspriserne stort set holdt sig over den nye indikativpris, fik medlemsstaterne udbetalt mere i godtgżrelse, end de var berettigede til som fżlge af det faktiske indtžgtstab p grund af prisnedsžttelser. 
As market prices stayed generally above the new target price, Member States received more compensation than was justified by the actual losses attributable to price reductions.
Jo hżjere denne difference var i en medlemsstat, jo stżrre fortjeneste opnede landbrugerne. 
The higher this difference was in a country, the more the farmers in this country benefited.
For de medlemsstater, som umiddelbart fżr reformen tegnede sig for en meget begržnset andel af udgifterne til eksportrestitutioner, oplagring og andre interventioner, betżd indfżrelsen af den nye arealstżtte, at deres andel af de samlede EU-budgetudgifter til korn żgedes (jf. tabel 9). 
For those countries which, immediately before the reform, were recipients of only small amounts of export refunds, storage and other interventions, the introduction of the new area aid resulted in an increase in their share of total EU budgetary expenditure on cereals (see Table 9).
Den ny ordning var naturligvis fordelagtig for den landbruger, som kunne vente med at sende korn ud p markedet, indtil priserne havde net det maksimale niveau. 
At the level of the individual farmer, it is clear that the new system was advantageous to farmers who were in a position to withhold their cereals from the market until prices reached their maximum.
Denne strategi giver mske ikke altid de żnskede resultater, men landbrugerne tilskyndes til at fżlge den, nr de ved med sikkerhed, at arealstżtten vil blive udbetalt i begyndelsen af perioden. 
This strategy may not always achieve its objective, but is encouraged when it is certain that area aid payments will be made at the beginning of the period.
Det er hovedsagelig de stżrre producenter med tilstržkkelige finansielle midler og private oplagringsfaciliteter, som har mulighed for at drage fordel af en sdan strategi. 
It is mainly the larger producers with sufficient financial means and private storage facilities who are in a position to benefit from such strategy.
Det foresls i Agenda 2000, at arealstżtten udbetales p et senere tidspunkt (i perioden januar-marts det fżlgende r i stedet for i perioden oktober-december i produktionsret), og at de mnedlige tillžg til interventionsprisen afskaffes. 
Agenda 2000 suggests that the area-aid payments should be made later (January to March of the following year, instead of October to December of the harvest year) and that the monthly increments to the intervention price should be abolished.
Sigtet med begge forslag er at forebygge tilbageholdelse af korn fra markedet og at skabe balance i udbuddet. 
Both suggestions are intended to counter withholding of cereals from the market and to even out market supply.
Men nr markedspriserne ligger p interventionsprisniveau, vil afskaffelsen af de mnedlige tillžg resultere i, at der vil blive foretaget stżrre interventionsopkżb ved begyndelsen af interventionsperioden (1. november). 
On the other hand, when the market operates at intervention price levels, the lack of monthly increments results in increased intervention buying at the beginning of the intervention period (1 November).
S er det kun lagerholderne, der fr fordel af efterfżlgende stigninger i markedspriserne. 
Subsequent increases in market prices then benefit storekeepers alone.
Udbytternes indflydelse 4.41. 
The influence of yields 4.41.
1765/92 bżr godtgżrelserne afspejle de specifikke strukturelle karakteristika, der influerer p udbytterne. 
According to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92, the specific structural characteristics that influence yields are to be taken into account when farmers are compensated.
Det blev sledes overladt til medlemsstaterne at anvende deres egne gennemsnitsudbytter. 
Indeed, each Member State was allowed to use its own average yields.
Ved udarbejdelsen af regionaliseringsplanerne tog medlemsstaterne hensyn til regionale karakteristika og fastsatte differentierede udbytter for de enkelte regioner (37). 
Regional characteristics were taken into account when Member States fixed their regionalisation plans, in which they established differentiated yields by region (37).
1765/92 indeholder ikke bestemmelser om, at sdan udbyttedifferentiering skal sikre, at stżttemidlerne omfordeles til ugunstigt stillede regioner eller medlemsstater. 
Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 did not require that this differentiation should lead to a redirection of funds to disadvantaged regions or States.
Det var tvžrtimod hensigten at sikre, at landbrugere i regioner eller medlemsstater med traditionelt hżjere udbytter ikke skulle underkompenseres i forhold til landbrugere i omrder med traditionelt lavere udbytter. 
On the contrary, it was intended that farmers in regions or States with traditionally higher yields should not be under-compensated by comparison with their counterparts in traditionally lower-yielding areas.
Kun Frankrig anvendte en faktor i sin regionaliseringsplan, som mindskede udbyttedifferencerne mellem de forskellige regioner . 
France alone introduced a factor which decreased yield differences between regions in its regionalisation plan.
(37) Retten kritiserede dette forhold i rsberetningen for regnskabsret 1996. 
(37) The Court expressed some criticism in this regard in its Annual Report concerning the financial year 1996.
Kilde: Kommissionens EUGFL-finansberetninger 1993 og 1997. 
Source: CommissionŐs financial reports 1993 and 1997.
Tabel 9 Udviklingen i kornudgifterne 1993-1997 i EU-12, pr. medlemsstat og pr. udgiftsart B DK D EL E F IRL I L NL P UK Ialt (mio. 
Table 9 Evolution of the expenditure for cereals from 1993 to 1997 for EU-12 by Member State and kind of expenditure B DK D EL E F IRL I L NL P UK TOTAL (million ECU)
8.7.1999 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 192/25 landbrugerne fra at żge produktiviteten globalt set. 
8.7.1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 192/25 4.43.
1992-reformen gav medlemsstaterne mulighed for at fastlžgge individuelle basisarealer. 
The 1992 reform offered Member States the option of establishing individual base areas.
Ingen af medlemsstaterne har indfżrt et sdant system, fordi det ville vžre forbundet med en s stor administrativ byrde. 
In view of the administrative burden which such a system would entail, no Member State introduced it.
Agenda 2000 giver ikke medlemsstaterne denne mulighed. 
This option has been withdrawn under Agenda 2000.
Bedriftsstżrrelsernes betydning 4.45. 
The influence of farm size 4.45.
Kommissionen konkluderede i meddelelse KOM(91) 100 endelig udg. af 1. februar 1991, at stigningen i budgetudgifterne, som i vidt omfang kom et lille mindretal af landbrugsbedrifter til gode, ikke lżste problemet med landbrugsindkomsternes ulige fordeling. 
In its communication COM(91)100 final of 1 February 1991 the Commission concluded that the rising budgetary expenditure, devoted in large part to a small minority of farms, provided no solution to the problem of uneven distribution of farm incomes.
Reformen žndrede heller ikke noget ved dette forhold. 
The reform did not change this situation either.
I 1995 blev nžsten 40 % af stżtten i form af godtgżrelser udbetalt til under 3 % af stżttemodtagerne. 
Indeed in 1995, almost 40 % of the compensatory payments were paid to less than 3 % of the beneficiaries.
Ser man p den anden ende af skalaen, tegner sm landbrugsbedrifter p under 5 ha, som udgżr 57 % af stżttemodtagerne, sig for kun 4,5 % af stżtten (jf. figur 5). 
At the other end of the scale, small farmers with less than 5 ha, who represent 57 % of beneficiaries get only 4,5 % (see Graph 5).
Bag disse tal skjuler der sig alvorlige skžvheder inden for Fžllesskabet. 
But these figures hide big disparities in the Community.
I Det Forenede Kongerige, hvor de stżrste landbrugsbedrifter findes, udgżr landbrugsbedrifter p 100 ha og derover 17 % af det samlede antal bedrifter, og de fr udbetalt 66 % af godtgżrelserne. 
In the United Kingdom, the Member State with the biggest farms, farms with 100 ha and more represent 17 % of total farms and get 66 % of the payments.
I Italien er 78 % af landbrugsbedrifterne p under 5 ha, men de fr kun 20 % af stżtten. 
In Italy, 78% of farms have less that 5 ha but get only 20% of the aid.
Man kan drage den konklusion, at systemet endda er i strid med traktatens artikel 39, stk. 1, litra a), eftersom det sandsynligvis vil afholde 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Figur 5 56,8 13,0 % af samlede belżb udbetalt i korngodtgżrelse % af samlede antal bedrifter 14,1 22,3 38,6 4,5 4,5 8,1 10,6 7,9 5,6 5,9 5,1 2,9 mindre end 5 ha 5-10 ha 10-20 ha 20-30 ha Udnyttet landbrugsareal i ha 30-50 ha 50-100 ha 100 ha og derover Kilde: Eurostat, 1995-statistikken over landbrugsbedrifternes struktur og GD VI, udgifterne i forbindelse med 1995-hżsten. 
Graph 5 Estimation of the concentration of cereals compensatory payments per holding size for EU-15 in 1995 (excluding the supplementary aid for durum wheat) 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% 56,8 13,0 % of total cereal compensatory payments % of total number of holdings 14,1 22,3 38,6 4,5 4,5 8,1 10,6 7,9 5,6 5,9 5,1 2,9 less than 5 ha 5 to 10 ha 10 to 20 ha 20 to 30 ha Utilised agricultural area in hectares (ha) 30 to 50 ha 50 to 100 ha 100 ha and more Source: Eurostat, 1995 survey of the structure of agricultural holdings and DG VI, expenditure for harvest 1995.
C 192/26 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 8.7.1999 4.46. 
C 192/26 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.7.1999 4.46.
Reformen žndrede derfor ikke grundlžggende ved det forhold, at en meget stor andel af de offentlige midler gr til de stżrste landbrugsbedrifter (38). 
The reform did not therefore fundamentally change the fact that large amounts of public money are spent on the largest farms (38).
Den eneste lżsning p dette problem m vžre, at stżtten gżres degressiv, dvs. jo stżrre bedrift, jo mindre stżtte. 
It would appear that the only solution to this problem is to make area-aid payments degressive in relation to farm size.
Der er imidlertid risiko for, at et sdant system misbruges, ved at stżrre landbrugsbedrifter splittes op i mindre alene med det forml at blive berettigede til hżjere stżttebelżb. 
It should be noted, however, that such a system would be vulnerable to abuse, if large farms were broken down into smaller ones for the sole purpose of qualifying for higher amounts of aid.
Landbrugsjordens vžrdi 4.47. 
Value of agricultural land 4.47.
En vžsentlig formuefaktor og dermed ogs levestandards-faktor er vžrdien af landbrugsjorden. 
A major determinant of wealth, and thus of standard of living, is the value of land owned by farmers.
Eftersom den forventede lżbende indkomst af denne landbrugsjord er et af de vžsentligste elementer i vurderingen af en landbrugsejendoms salgsvžrdi, vil reformen, som sikrer landbrugerne en bestemt og endelig indkomst af jorden, ganske bestemt indvirke p landbrugsjordens vžrdi. 
As the stream of income expected from this land is a principal determinant of the selling price, the reform, which attributes a fixed and definite income to the land, will certainly have an impact on land values.
Retten kunne ikke beregne denne effekt, fordi der ikke forel empiriske data. 
Owing to the lack of empirical data, the Court was unable to estimate this impact.
Kun Det Forenede Kongerige kunne forelžgge data, som indikerer, at salgsprisen for landbrugsjord vil stige. 
Only the UK was able to provide some data, which suggest there will be an increase in the sale price of farm land.
Anlžgger man en videnskabelig vurdering, kan landbrugsreformen mske resultere i, at salgsprisen for drlig landbrugsjord stiger, og at salgsprisen for god landbrugsjord falder (39). 
However, a scientific approach shows that the CAP reform may lead to an increase in the selling price of poor land and a decrease in that for good land (39).
Det skyldes, at godtgżrelserne udgżr en stżrre andel af de landbrugeres indkomst, som har jord af drlig kvalitet og svingende udbytter, og at de i relativt stżrre omfang er en hjžlp til landbrugere med usikre indkomstforhold. 
This is due to the fact that compensatory payments form a larger share of the income of farms with poor land and unreliable yields, and help farmers to overcome uncertainty concerning income to a relatively greater degree.
EU-korn var i overgangsperioden relativt mere konkurrencedygtigt p verdensmarkedet end korn af anden oprindelse og end kornsubstitutter p EU-markedet, fordi de interne priser faldt, og fordi EU-priserne nžrmede sig de internationale priser (jf. punkt 4.13). 
During the transitional period cuts in internal prices and the latterŐs convergence with international prices rendered EU cereals relatively more competitive than other cereals on the world market and cereal substitutes on the internal market (see paragraph 4.13).
I overgangsperioden l verdensmarkedspriserne imod alle forventninger ved reformens gennemfżrelse p et usždvanligt hżjt niveau p grund af forsyningsmangel p verdensmarkedet. 
Contrary to the expectations at the time of the reform, the world price level during the transitional period was exceptionally high due to supply shortages on the world market.
Det synes derfor rimeligt at antage, at denne gunstige effekt p konkurrencedygtigheden sandsynligvis skyldes historisk set temmelig usždvanlige markedsforhold i overgangsperioden. 
It therefore seems reasonable to consider this favourable effect on competitiveness as being the result of historically, a, rather exceptional market situation during the transitional period.
Fra 1996 til 1998, dvs. de fżrste r hvor reformen anvendtes fuldt ud, faldt de internationale priser temmelig meget. 
Indeed, international prices between 1996 and 1998, i.e. the first years of full application of the reform, decreased quite sharply.
Agenda 2000 omfatter forslag om yderligere sžnkninger af interventionsprisen, som kunne bevirke, at EU-markedspriserne fżlger den nedadgende tendens, som forventes for verdensmarkedspriserne. 
Agenda 2000 proposes further cuts in the intervention price which would allow internal market prices to follow the expected downward trend in world prices.
Sfremt det ikke vil vžre muligt at foretage sdanne yderligere nedsžttelser af interventionspriserne, vil EU-kornproduktionens konkurrencedygtighed vžre truet. 
If it were not possible to make these further reductions in intervention prices, the competitiveness of EU cereal production would be at risk.
Andre faktorer, ssom kvalitetsforbedringer, kan selvfżlgelig ogs spille ind, men for bulkvarer som korn vil prisen altid vžre afgżrende for konkurrencedygtigheden. 
Of course, other factors, such as quality improvements, could play a role in this regard but for bulk goods, such as cereals, the price remains the major determinant of competitiveness.
De ml, der blev fastsat for Mac Sharry-reformen, nemlig at f bragt kornkrisen ud af verden og at skabe markedsbalance, er blevet opfyldt i overgangsperioden. 
With regard to the effect of the reform on stabilising the market, within the meaning of the Mac Sharry reform, i.e. ending the cereal crisis and establishing market balance, the reform achieved its objective over the transitional period.
Produktionen blev fastholdt p niveauet fżr reformen, oplagring blev reduceret til nžsten nul, og over halvdelen af den samlede eksport blev gennemfżrt uden eksportrestitutioner. 
Production was kept at pre-reform level, storage was reduced to almost zero, and more than half of the exports were achieved without export refunds.
Man kunne mske have forventet, at jordudtagningsordningen og prisnedsžttelserne havde bragt produktionen ned p et endnu lavere niveau, end de faktisk gjorde Ń jordudtagningsordningen ved at korndyrkningsarealerne blev reduceret, og prisnedsžttelserne ved at markedsindkomsterne faldt i forhold til produktionsomkostningerne og dermed ogs, at gżdning og pesticider blev anvendt i mindre omfang. 
It might have been expected that set-aside and price cuts would reduce production to a greater extent than it actually did: the former by reducing the area under cereals and the latter by lowering market revenues in relation to production costs thus reducing inputs like fertilisers and pesticides.
Produkti-onstendensen globalt set og navnlig de divergerende tendenser i medlemsstaterne viser imidlertid, at det er temmelig vanskeligt at se, om reformen har haft en mere varig effekt p produktionen. 
However, looking at the global production trend and, in particular, at the divergent trends in Member States, it is quite difficult to ascertain any lasting effect of the reform on production.