natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I denne erklžring betragtede Europa-Parlamentet fżdevarehjžlpen som et bidrag til fattigdomsbekžmpelsen og opfordrede Kommissionen og Rdet til at opretholde og żge stżtten og foretage visse tilpasninger af programgennemfżrelsen (jf. tekstboks 8). 
In its declaration, the European Parliament regarded the measure as a part of the aim of reducing poverty, and invited the Commission and the Council to maintain and increase the aid with certain implementing adaptations (see Box 8).
17 18 Forordning (EF) nr. 1234/2007, TEKSTBOKS 8 DE VIGTIGSTE PUNKTER I EUROPA-PARLAMENTETS ERKLŽRING Ľ at erkende, at der er mennesker i EU, der lider af underernžring, og at bekržfte, at det er nżdvendigt at opfylde deres ernžringsmžssige behov Ľ at gżre EUŐs fżdevarehjžlpeprogram permanent og tildele en flerrig bevillingsramme Ľ at udvide foranstaltningen til at omfatte nye produkter som f.eks. svinekżd, fjerkrž og žg Ľ at lade programmet omfatte innovative foranstaltninger, der sigter mod ligelig fordeling af fżdevarerationer Ľ at betragte fżdevarehjžlpen som et bidrag til fattigdomsbekžmpelsen Ľ at žndre bestemmelserne, sledes at det bliver muligt: Ľ at opbygge lagre, der er forbeholdt programmet, dvs. beregnet til de drligst stillede Ľ at udvide kompensationsaftalen Ľ at kżbe de produkter p fžllesskabsmarkedet, der ikke findes p interventionslagrene. 
17 18 Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, BOX 8 EP’S DECLARATION MAIN POINTS • recognise the fact that there are undernourished people in the European Union and acknowledge the need to meet their food requirements, • place the European food aid programme on a permanent footing and provide a global multiannual budget allocation, • open the measure up to new sectors such as pork, poultry and eggs, • include in the programme innovative measures to ensure the distribution of balanced food rations, • regard food aid as part of the aim of reducing poverty, • modify the rules so as to allow: • for the stocks reserved for the programme to be build up, i.e. set aside for and allocated to the most deprived, • for the bartering procedure to be extended, • for products that are not available as part of intervention stocks to be bought on the Community market.
SAMORDNINGEN MED ANDRE SOCIALPOLITISKE FORANSTALTNINGER SKAL FORBEDRES 32. 
COORDINATION WITH OTHER SOCIAL POLICY MEASURES SHOULD BE IMPROVED 32.
Lovgiver fastslog klart, at fżdevareprogrammet skulle betragtes som en endog vžsentlig hjžlp til de socialt drligst stillede19 (jf. tekstboks 6). 
The legislator clearly established that the food aid programme should be regarded as a contribution, albeit significant, towards the well-being of its most deprived citizens19 (see Box 6).
Denne hjžlpeforanstaltning bżr derfor koordineres og skabe synergi med andre politikker, ordninger og foranstaltninger, der etableres p bde fžllesskabs-og medlemsstatsniveau, s de socialt drligst stilledes behov opfyldes mere effektivt. 
Hence, this contribution should be coordinated and create synergies with the other policies, schemes and actions set up at both Community and Member States levels to meet better the needs of the most deprived persons.
I de reviderede medlemsstater er forvaltningsmyndighederne de betalingsorganer, der er ansvarlige for landbrugsudgifter. 
At the level of the Member States audited, the managing authorities are the paying agencies for agricultural expenditure.
Bortset fra i Frankrig var der i de reviderede medlemsstater intet bevis for, at der var et nžrt samarbejde mellem betalingsorganet og andre nżgleaktżrer p socialomrdet ssom socialministerierne. 
With the exception of France, in the Member States audited there was no evidence of close cooperation between the paying agency and other key actors for social actions such as the ministries of social affairs.
Et sdant samarbejde er nżdvendigt for en bedre forstelse og imżdekommelse af de velgżrende organisationers og de socialt drligt stilledes behov. 
Such cooperation is necessary for better understanding and meeting the needs of the charitable organisations and of the deprived persons.
DE ANVENDTE MIDLER OG METODER: STR MIDLERNE I ET RIMELIGT FORHOLD TIL DE TILSIGTEDE ML, OG ANVENDES DE EFFEKTIVT? 
THE MEANS AND METHODS EMPLOYED: ARE THE MEANS COMMENSURATE WITH THE OBJECTIVES SOUGHT AND ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENTED?
Det store antal af potentielle stżttemodtagere og det relativt lave niveau af disponible ressourcer betyder, at stżtten skal mlrettes mod modtagerne, hvis foranstaltningen skal have en vžsentlig effekt p mlgruppen. 
The large number of potential beneficiaries and the relatively low level of available resources mean that beneficiaries need to be targeted to allow the measure to have any significant impact on the target population.
Som det fremgr af bilag II, andrager budgetbevillingerne pr. potentiel modtager ca. seks euro pr. person pr. r. 
As shown in table in Annex II the budgetary appropriations per potential beneficiary amounts to about six euro per person per year.
P den anden side anfżrer Kommissionen i sin konsekvensanalyse, at mere end 13 millioner mennesker i 15 medlemsstater modtog stżtte under programmet i 2006, og den skżnner, at omkostningerne til et enkelt mltid uddelt af de velgżrende organisationer belżber sig til mindst to euro. 
On the other hand the Commission, in its impact assessment, indicates that in 2006 more than 13 million people in 15 Member States benefited from the programme and estimates that the cost of a single meal offered by charities is at least two euro.
Det betyder, at programmet bidrager til uddeling af hżjst tre mltider pr. r til hver enkelt potentielt socialt drligt stillet person, eller i gennemsnit til 12 mltider pr. r til de enkelte faktiske stżttemodtagere. 
This implies that the programme contributes to the distribution of a maximum of three meals per year for each potential deprived person, or an average of 12 meals per year for each actual beneficiary of the aid.
19 Forordning (EŻF) nr. 3730/87. 
19 Regulation (EEC) No 3730/87.
I visse medlemsstater tegner EU-programmet sig for mere end 50 % af den mad, der uddeles til drligt stillede personer (jf. tekstboks 5), men Retten mener, at det er usandsynligt, at et program, der hżjst giver, hvad der svarer til t mltid pr. mned i gennemsnit til sine modtagere, vil opfylde lovgivers ml, navnlig mlet om Čat hjžlpe de socialt drligst stilledeÇ20. 
While the EU programme in certain Member States accounts for more than 50 % of the food distributed to deprived citizens (see Box 5), the Court considers that a programme which offers, as a maximum, the equivalent of one meal per month to its beneficiaries on average is unlikely to meet the objectives of the legislator, namely that of making a ‘significant contribution towards the well-being of its most deprived citizens’20.
I denne forbindelse ville det ideelt set vžre nżdvendigt at forbedre udvžlgelseskriterierne og/eller prioriteterne blandt potentielle stżttemodtagere, som det anbefales i konsekvensanalysen21; ellers vil programmets hjžlp til de drligst stilledes velbefindende uundgeligt vžre ubetydelig. 
In this respect, it would ideally be necessary to improve selection criteria and or priorities amongst potential beneficiaries as recommended by the impact assessment21; otherwise the contribution of the programme to the well-being of the most deprived persons will inevitably be negligible.
Det er imidlertid vigtigt at erkende, at velgżrende organisationer, alene som fżlge af deres art, muligvis ikke vil vžre i stand til eller villige til at gennemfżre en restriktiv uddelingspolitik. 
It is important to recognise, however, that charitable organisations, by their very nature, may not be able or willing to adopt restrictive distribution policies.
STŻTTEBERETTIGELSES-OG UDVŽLGELSESKRITERIERNE ER UKLARE 38. 
UNCLEAR ELIGIBILITY AND SELECTION CRITERIA 38.
For at maksimere stżttens effekt er det nżdvendigt at definere anvendelige prioriteter bde med hensyn til udvžlgelse af de velgżrende organisationer, der skal kanalisere stżtten, og med hensyn til de kategorier og/eller befolkningsgrupper, der skal modtage fżdevarehjžlpen. 
In order to maximise the impact of the aid it is necessary to define workable priorities, both in view of selecting the charitable organisations which will channel the aid, and regarding categories and/or groups of the population who will receive the food aid.
Revisorerne konstaterede, at medlemsstaterne i praksis ofte uden formaliserede procedurer har udpeget et lille antal organisationer, der opererer p nationalt plan, og som organisationer p lavere niveau deltager i. 
The auditors found that in practice Member States have often without formalised procedures designated a small number of organisations operating nationwide, in which lower level organisations participate.
Der foreligger ikke pržcise oplysninger om, hvor mange udpegede velgżrende organisationer myndighederne i medlemsstaterne samarbejder med ved gennemfżrelsen af rsplanerne. 
Precise data on the number of the designated charitable organisations with which the authorities of the Member States cooperate for the implementation of the annual plans are not available.
De velgżrende organisationer p regionalt niveau deltager automatisk i EU-programmet som medlemmer af den overordnede velgżrende organisation. 
The charitable organisations at regional level automatically participate in the EU programme as being members of the main charitable organisations.
De kan rimeligt uafhžngigt opstille de kriterier, de anvender ved godkendelse af organisationer p lavere niveau til uddeling af fżdevarehjžlp. 
They have certain independence in establishing the criteria they apply for accepting lower level organisations for the distribution of food aid.
20 Forordning (EF) nr. 1234/2007, betragtning 18. 
20 Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, recital 18.
1290/2005 om finansiering af den fžlles landbrugspolitik og forordning (EF) nr. 
21 Points 4 and 6.5 of Commission staff working document SEC(2008) 2436/2 accompanying the Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy and Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) as regards food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community (COM(2008) 563 final).
I henhold til retsbestemmelserne skal stżtteberettigelseskriterierne for modtagerne endvidere baseres p Čen ringe social og finansiel situation, der er konstateret og erkendtÇ. 
Furthermore, according to the legal provisions, the beneficiaries’ eligibility criteria should be based on ‘recorded or recognised social and financial dependence’.
De nationale myndigheder bżr derfor fastsžtte sdanne kriterier eller godkende de kriterier, de velgżrende organisationer anvender. 
Accordingly, national authorities should adopt such criteria or to approve criteria used by charitable organisations.
Medlemsstaterne skal ogs hvert r meddele Kommissionen de stżtteberettigelseskriterier, som modtagerne skal opfylde. 
Member States are also required to notify the Commission annually of the eligibility criteria to be met by recipients.
Retten konstaterede, at medlemsstaterne ikke havde fastsat sdanne pržcise stżtteberettigelseskriterier. 
The Court found that no such precise eligibility criteria were fixed by the Member States.
De kriterier, der hvert r meddeles Kommissionen22, er snarere en typologi over de personer, der modtager stżtte, end kvantitative eller kvalitative udvžlgelseskriterier (jf. tekstboks 9). 
The criteria communicated annually to the Commission22 are rather a typology of the persons assisted rather than quantitative or qualitative selection criteria (see Box 9).
Endelig konstaterede Retten, at der var stor forskel p, hvor tit der blev modtaget hjžlp (nogle personer fik lejlighedsvise mltider sammenlignet med mennesker p sociale institutioner eller de familier, der regelmžssigt modtog fżdevarehjžlp eller -pakker). 
Finally the Court found that there were significant differences in the frequency of reception of the aid (some persons having occasional meals provided compared to people in social institutes or to families receiving food aid or parcels on a regular basis).
22 I henhold til artikel 1, stk. 
22 Pursuant to Article 1(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92.
3149/92. Kilde: velgżrende organisationer TEKSTBOKS 9 20 EKSEMPLER P STŻTTEBERETTIGELSESKRITERIER, DER ANVENDES AF VELGŻRENDE ORGANISATIONER Ľ Żkonomiske kriterier: hjemlżshed, fattigdom, arbejdslżshed Ľ Sociale kriterier: immigranter, žldre, storfamilier Ľ Helbredskriterier: sygdomme, handicap. 
Source: Charitable Organisations. BOX 9 20 EXAMPLES OF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA USED BY CHARITABLE ORGANISATIONS • Economic criteria: homelessness, poverty, unemployment ... • Social criteria: immigrants, elderly people, large families ... • Health criteria: illnesses, handicapped.
6/2009 Ń Den Europžiske Unions fżdevarehjžlp til socialt drligt stillede personer: en vurdering af mlene og de anvendte midler og metoder VARIATIONEN AF DEN MAD, DER STILLES TIL RDIGHED, BEGRŽNSES AF SAMMENKOBLINGEN TIL INTERVENTIONSLAGRENE, OG DISTRIBUTIONSMETODERNE VARIERER MEGET 42. 
Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed THE VARIETY OF FOOD MADE AVAILABLE IS CONSTRAINED BY THE INTERVENTION STORAGE LINK, AND DISTRIBUTION VARIES WIDELY 42.
De velgżrende organisationers metoder til uddeling af levnedsmidler til drligt stillede personer kan variere, alt afhžngig af den velgżrende organisations specifikke aktiviteter (mltider uddelt i offentlige kantiner, mltider uddelt i vuggestuer og hospicer, fżdevarepakker uddelt til enkeltpersoner og familier etc.). 
The distribution of the foodstuffs by the charitable organisations to deprived persons may take different forms depending on the specific activities of the charitable organisation (meals offered in public canteens, meals offered in nurseries and hospices, packages of food delivered to individuals and families, etc.).
Foranstaltningens oprindelse og dens sammenkobling til uddeling af levnedsmidler, som tidligere har vžret til rdighed p fžllesskabs-lagre, har ogs resulteret i regler, som begržnser variationen af de endelige produkter, der kan opkżbes og uddeles til drligt stillede personer under programmet. 
The origin of the measure and its link with the distribution of foodstuff historically available from Community stocks also led to rules governing the programme which impose constraints on the variety of final products that may be acquired and distributed to the deprived persons.
I henhold til bestemmelserne23 skal de produkter, der er tilvejebragt p EF-markedet, tilhżre den samme produktgruppe som det produkt, der midlertidigt ikke er disponibelt p interventionslagrene. 
The legal provisions23 stipulate that the supply of products mobilised on the Community market must belong to the same product group as the product temporarily unavailable in the intervention stocks.
Frem til september 2007 skulle produkter fra interventionslagre repržsentere mindst 40 % af nettovžgten af de fżdevareprodukter, der skulle leveres. 
Up to September 2007 products from intervention stocks had to represent at least 40 % of the net weight of the food product to be supplied.
Eftersom en ržkke produkter ikke lžngere bringes til intervention (f.eks. oksekżd, olivenolie), er valget af de produkter, der er til rdighed til uddeling til drligt stillede personer, begržnset. 
Given the fact that in the course of the years some products have no longer been taken into intervention (e.g. beef, olive oil), the choice of products available for distribution to deprived persons has become limited.
Retten konstaterede, at flere velgżrende institutioner, der deltager i gennemfżrelsen af programmet, ans det for en prioritet at żge variationen af produkterne for at gżre det muligt at tilberede afbalancerede mltider24. 
The Court found that several charitable organisations participating in the implementation of the programme considered it a priority to enlarge the variety of the products offered to allow the preparation of balanced meals24.
1, litra b), og stk. 2, litra a), i forordning (EŻF) nr. 
23 Article 4(1)(b) and 4(2a) of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92.
24 De understregede navnlig behovet for fżdevareprodukter som olie, tomatpasta, kżd og frosne grżnsager. 21 Sžrberetning nr. 6/2009 Ń Den Europžiske Unions fżdevarehjžlp til socialt drligt stillede personer: en vurdering af mlene og de anvendte midler og metoder 
24 In particular they expressed the need for food products such as oil, tomato pasta, meat, frozen vegetables. 21 Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed
Revisorerne konstaterede ogs, at der blev anvendt mange forskellige systemer og metoder til fordeling af levnedsmidler fra forvaltningsmyndighederne til de udpegede organisationer, fra disse organisationer til de velgżrende organisationer p lavere niveau og endelig til de socialt drligt stillede personer (jf. tekstboks 10). 
The auditors also found that a wide variety of systems and methodologies are used to distribute foodstuffs from the managing authorities to designated organisations, from there to lower level charitable organisations and finally to deprived persons (see Box 10).
22 TEKSTBOKS 10 BESTEMMELSER VEDRŻRENDE DISTRIBUTION I medlemsstater med to eller flere udpegede organisationer fordeles fżdevarerne mellem dem p basis af en forud fastsat standardprocentsats, som ikke er blevet taget op til revision i mange r (Frankrig og Polen). 
22 BOX 10 DISTRIBUTION MODALITIES In Member States where more than one designated organisations are operating, the allocation of the foodstuffs among them is based on predetermined standard percentages applied and un-revised for many years (France, Poland).
I Italien anvendes der ikke udpegede organisationer, og fordelingen af de endelige produkter sker direkte til organisationer p regionalt niveau p basis af fastsatte parametre (antallet af aktioner og ansżgninger). 
In Italy designated organisations are not involved and the distribution of the final products is made directly to regional level organisations on the basis on specified parameters (number of interventions and applications).
I forbindelse med distributionen af mad fra de udpegede nationale organisationer til organisationerne p lavere niveau anvendes der igen en lang ržkke forskellige systemer og i nogle tilfžlde faktorer. 
For the distribution of the food from the designated national organisations to the lower level organisations again a multiplicity of systems and in some cases factors are used.
I Spanien er distributionen baseret p en ržkke koefficienter, der er fastsat af den udpegede organisation. 
In Spain the distribution is based on certain coefficients set by the designated organisation.
I Polen anvender de besżgte organisationer deres egne systemer. 
In Poland the organisations visited apply their own systems.
En organisation har for eksempel opstillet et kvantitativt ml p 35 kg mad pr. person pr. r. 
For example one organisation has set a quantitative target, which is 35 kg of food per person per year.
I Frankrig anvender hver enkelt udpeget organisation sit eget system. n organisation fordeler for eksempel ressourcer til 79 organisationer p 2. niveau p basis af en faktor kaldet Čkoefficient KÇ, som er fastsat p basis af en ržkke kriterier: departementets befolkning, antallet af arbejdssżgende, antallet af langtidsledige, antallet af personer, der modtager den laveste overfżrselsindkomst. 
In France each designated organisation applies its own system. For example one organisation allocates the resources to 79 second level organisations on the basis of a factor called ‘coefficients K’ which is determined ‘according to certain criteria: population of the department, number of jobseekers, number of long-term jobseekers, number of recipients of minimum welfare income for the unemployed’.
En anden organisation fordeler mad til 98 sammenslutninger p basis af antallet af anmeldte modtagere. 
Another organisation distributes the food to 98 federations proportionally to the number of beneficiaries declared.
De velgżrende organisationers distribution af levnedsmidler til de endelige modtagere og leveringsfre-kvensen er baseret p organisationernes egne kriterier og logistiske kapacitet. 
The distribution of the foodstuffs to the final recipients by the charitable organisations and the frequency of deliveries are based on their own criteria and logistical capacities.
I nogle tilfžlde foreslr de velgżrende organisationer visse kriterier. 
In some cases charitable organisations suggest certain criteria.
For eksempel har en organisation i Polen foreslet en ržkke standarder for de enkelte leveringer til privatpersoner, f.eks. mžlk: mindst 15 liter pr. person og pr. levering, mel: mindst 5 kg pr. person og pr. levering. 
For example in Poland one organisation has proposed some standards for each delivery to an individual, e.g. milk at least 15 l per person and delivery, flour at least 5 kg per person and delivery.
I de fleste tilfžlde fordeler de velgżrende organisationer det, de har modtaget, p basis af deres egne kriterier og i nogle tilfžlde p basis af princippet om ligebehandling af de tržngende personer, dvs. at kvantiteten af de disponible produkter fordeles i lige dele til de personer, der er medlemmer af organisationen, eller som anmoder om hjžlp. Sžrberetning nr. 6/2009 Ń Den Europžiske Unions fżdevarehjžlp til socialt drligt stillede personer: en vurdering af mlene og de anvendte midler og metoder 
In most of the cases the charitable organisations distribute whatever they have received on the basis of their own criteria and in some cases on the principle of equal treatment of the persons in need, i.e. the quantity of the available products is distributed in equal parts to each person adhered to the organisation or requesting the aid. Special Report No 6/2009 — European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed
Kort sagt er der i hele distributionskžden ikke nogen fžlles standarder, retningslinjer eller indikationer p fžllesskabsniveau eller p nationalt niveau vedrżrende kvantiteten eller variationen af de produkter, der skal uddeles pr. person. 
Specifically, in the entire distribution chain there are no common standards, guidelines or indications at Community or national level concerning the quantity and the variety of products to be distributed per person.
Retten konstaterede, at der er stor forskel p de mžngder, der blev uddelt pr. person i de enkelte medlemsstater og blandt velgżrende organisationer i samme medlemsstat. 
The Court found that the quantities distributed per person in each Member State and among the charitable organisations of the same Member State, differ considerably.
En sdan uensartet tilgang żger risikoen for, at der kun opns en begržnset effekt, og fżrer til ulige behandling af de endelige stżttemodtagere (jf. tekstboks 11). 
Such a diverse approach increases the risk of negligible impact and leads to unequal treatment between final recipients of the aid (see Box 11).
Bilag III viser de produkter og mžngder, som er tildelt pr. medlemsstat og pr. endelig modtager for 2005-rsplanen, for hvilken der forel data om endelige modtagere. 
Annex III shows the products and quantities allocated by Member State and per final recipient for the annual plan 2005, for which data on final recipients are available.