natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det blev medgivet, at det ikke var muligt at foretage en tilbundsgende evaluering, eftersom programmerne fżrst var blevet ivžrksat i 1996, og der kun forel forelżbige data for 1997. 
It recognised that as they had only been introduced in 1996, and only provisional data had been available for 1997, an in-depth evaluation was not possible.
Derfor er der kun foretaget en uafhžngig evaluering af de fżrste rater af den fżrste SAF under det fżrste Meda-program. 
It means, that only the first instalments of the first SAF under the first MEDA programme have been independently evaluated.
Det blev medgivet i selve evalueringsberetningen, at en ržkke af betingelserne for udbetalingen af disse fżrste rater allerede mere eller mindre var opfyldt p det tidspunkt, hvor finansieringsaftalen blev undertegnet. 
The evaluation report itself recognised for these first instalments that certain conditions had been more or less fulfilled already at the time of the signature of the Financing Agreement.
De enkelte SAF-programmer er ikke systematisk blevet evalueret uafhžngigt som fuldstžndige programmer (2). 
Systematic independent evaluations of individual SAF as complete programmes have not been carried out (2).
Finansieringsaftalerne indeholder ikke klare bestemmelser om evaluering af disse programmer. 
The Financing Agreements do not include clear provision for evaluation of these programmes.
Hertil kommer, at selv om det fremgr af finansieringsaftalerne for Middelhavslandene, at modtageren skal forelžgge en rapport, nr projektet er gennemfżrt, er dette princip aldrig blevet hndhžvet konsekvent. 
In addition, although the Financing Agreements for the Mediterranean countries state that the recipient shall submit a report on completion of the project, this has never been systematically enforced.
MFA til tredjelande 63. 
MFA to third countries 63.
Det fremgr af de forskellige rdsafgżrelser om MFA, at Kommissionen skal forelžgge Europa-Parlamentet og Rdet en beretning (sždvanligvis mindst en gang om ret, og for nogle afgżrelsers vedkommende senest den 15. september), der skal indeholde en evaluering af gennemfżrelsen af afgżrelserne. 
The various Council decisions on MFA state that the Commission shall send to the European Parliament and to the Council a report (usually at least once a year, for some decisions by 15 September), which should include an evaluation of the implementation of the decisions.
For at efterkomme dette krav har Kommissionen udarbejdet rsberetninger. 
In compliance with this requirement the Commission established annual reports.
Beretningerne for 1997 og 1998 blev begge fżrst offentliggjort i november 1999, og 1999-beretningen blev ikke offentliggjort fżr ved udgangen af oktober 2000 (3). 
The 1997 and 1998 reports were both published only in November 1999 and the 1999 report was not published until the end of October 2000 (3).
1999-beretningen indeholder en generel oversigt over MFA (baggrund, udviklingen i indevžrende r, trends og tendenser, byrdefordeling) og giver tillige en beskrivelse af situationen i hvert enkelt modtagerland. 
The 1999 report gives a general overview of MFA (back-ground, developments in the current year, trends and tendencies, burden sharing) and also contains a description of the situation in each beneficiary country.
Samlet set er beretningen omfattende, men (1) Meddelelse fra Kommissionen til Rdet og Europa-Parlamentet om EFŐs stżtte til programmer for żkonomiske reformer og strukturtilpasning: status og perspektiver, KOM(2000) 58 endelig udg. af 2 4. februar 2000. () Meda-ledelsesteamet (bestende af eksterne eksperter) har evalueret det marokkanske program. 
Overall the report is comprehensive, (1) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council: Community support for economic reform programmes and structural adjustment: review and prospects 2 (COM(2000) 58 final of 4 February 2000). () The MEDA management team (composed of external experts) carried out an evaluation of the Moroccan programme.
Det var et interessant dokument med mange relevante betragtninger, som kunne vžre af betydning for SAF 3 i andre lande. () Beretning fra Kommissionen til Europa-Parlamentet og Rdet om den makrofinansielle bistand til tredjelande i 1999, KOM(2000) 682 endelig udg. af 27. oktober 2000. redegżrelsen for de makrożkonomiske resultater og strukturreformerne ville have tjent formlet bedre, hvis det fremgik, p hvilken mde bistanden er relateret hertil, og hvilken sammenhžng den har hermed. 
This was an interesting document with many pertinent points, which could be of interest 3 for SAF in other countries. () Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of MFA to third countries in 1999 (COM(2000) 682 final of 27 October 2000). however the explanations concerning macroeconomic performance and structural reforms would have more relevance if links and causalities with the assistance were established.
Redegżrelsen for gennemfżrelsen af afgżrelserne er meget kortfattet og kan ikke betragtes som en evaluering. 
The explanatory parts on the implementation of the decisions are very short and cannot be considered as evaluations.
Kommissionen har ikke bedt om uafhžngige eksterne evalueringer, hverken for aktiviteten som helhed eller for de enkelte lande. 
The Commission did not request independent external evaluations either for the activity as a whole or for individual countries.
Der blev ikke foretaget samme form for evalueringer for MFA til EU-tiltrždelseslande, De Nye Uafhžngige Stater og Det Vestlige Balkan som for andre lande, der modtager tilsvarende stżtte (jf. punkt 61). 
The MFA given to EU accessioncountries,tothenewindependentStatesandtothe western Balkans was not subject to evaluations of the kind carried out for other countries receiving similar support (see paragraph 61).
Der er ikke foretaget evalueringer af MFA, og Kommissionen har sledes endnu ikke efterlevet sin generelle politik for evaluering af Fžllesskabets udgiftsprogrammer. 
The absence of evaluations for MFA means that the Commission has not yet followed its general policy for the evaluation of Community expenditure programmes.
Ved SEM 2000-initiativet blev der indfżrt en generel politik for evaluering af Fžllesskabets udgiftsprogrammer. 
The SEM 2000 initiative introduced a generalised policy for evaluation of Community expenditure programmes.
I henhold hertil har de berżrte GDŐer og tjenestegrene ansvaret for regelmžssigt at evaluere deres programmer og for at afsžtte de ressourcer, der er nżdvendige for at planlžgge og forest de evalueringer, der skal foretages inden for deres omrde (4). 
According to this Ôthe operational DGs and services are responsible for regular evaluation of their programmes and for organising the capacity needed for planning and managing the evaluations needed in their policy areaŐ (4).
De operationelle afdelinger bżr ogs lade planlžgningen af evalueringer indg i deres arbejdsplaner (5). 
The operational departments should also integrate the programming of evaluations into their work plans (5).
Disse krav er ikke opfyldt for s vidt angr MFA, der forvaltes af GD ECFIN. 
These requirements are not met in the field of MFA managed by DG ECFIN.
KONKLUSIONER OG ANBEFALINGER Indledning 66. 
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Introduction 66.
De to instrumenter har givet Kommissionen mulighed for at indlede en mere frugtbar dialog med regeringerne om hele reformprocessen, hvilket normalt ikke er muligt i forbindelse med isžr traditionelle udviklingsprojekter. 
The two instruments have given the Commission the opportunity to enter into more meaningful dialogue with governments over the whole reform process, something traditional development projects in particular do not usually allow.
Instrumenterne har gennem rene žndret karakter, og Kommissionen bżr inddrage alle berżrte GDŐer i de fortsatte overvejelser om, hvordan disse instrumenter bedst kan anvendes som led i den samlede politik over for modtagerlandene. 
There has been an evolution in the nature of these instruments over the years and the Commission should continue to reflect, involving all the DGs concerned, on the best way these instruments can be used as part of its overall policy towards the beneficiary countries.
Kommissionen handler ikke alene. 
The Commission does not act on its own.
Det Europžiske Rd har om MFA understreget, at Europa-Kommissionen ikke er nogen international finansieringsinstitution p linje med Verdensbanken og Den Internationale Valutafond. 
In the context of MFA, the European Council underlined the fact that the European Commission is not an international financial institution like the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund.
Det er i den sammenhžng blevet fremhžvet, at makrożkonomiske foranstaltninger bżr have 4 () Focus on results: Strengthening evaluation of Commission activites; Meddelelse til Kommissionen fra Mrs. Schleyer i forstelse med Mr. Kin-5 nock og formanden, SEC(2000) 1051 af 26. juli 2000, s. 
In that context it has been underlined that macroeconomic interventions should 4 () Focus on results: Strengthening evaluation of Commission activities; communication to the Commission from Mrs Schleyer in agreement 5 with Mr Kinnock and the President (SEC(2000) 1051, 26.7.2000, p.
3. () Spending more wisely: Implementation of the CommissionŐs evaluation policy, Meddelelse til Kommissionen fra Mrs. Gradin og Mr. Lii-kanen i forstelse med formanden, SEC(1999) 69/4. 
3). () Spending more wisely: Implementation of the CommissionŐs evaluation policy, communication to the Commission by Mrs Gradin and Mr Liikanen, in agreement with the President (SEC(1999) 69/4).
C 121/14 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 23.5.2002 ekstraordinžr karakter. 
C 121/14 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23.5.2002 be exceptional.
Den Europžiske Unions rolle som en tredje international aktżr p dette omrde er imidlertid ikke klart defineret, og det er ikke blevet gjort klart, hvilken mervžrdi EUŐs bidrag skal tilfżre (jf. punkt 30-33). 
The role of the European Union as a third international player in this area, however, has not been clearly defined and it is not made explicit what the added value of the EU contribution is supposed to be (see paragraphs 30 to 33).
Anbefaling 1 68. 
Recommendation 1 68.
Kommissionen bżr altid begrunde, hvorfor en sžrskilt EU-aktion med alle de administrative konsekvenser, som en sdan har, er pkržvet. 
The Commission should always establish the reasons why a separate EU action, with all its administrative consequences, is necessary.
Den forventede mervžrdi bżr ikke blot sammenholdes med BWIŐs eksisterende programmer. 
The expected added value should not only be indicated compared to existing programmes of the BWI.
For MFAŐs vedkommende bżr det tillige sikres, at der er komplementaritet med EUŐs traditionelle bistand til projekter og programmer. 
In the case of MFA, complementarity should also be ensured with the traditional EU project and programme assistance.
Ensartede procedurer for beslžgtede instrumenter 69. 
Consistent approach to similar instruments 69.
MFA og SAF er beslžgtede instrumenter. 
MFA and SAF are similar instruments.
I begge tilfžlde er der tale om fungible midler, som udbetales i rater, nr Kommissionen har forvisset sig om, at betingelserne, der hovedsagelig tager sigte p at stżtte strukturreformer inden for modtagerstatens żkonomi, og som er fastlagt i en aftale mellem Kommissionen og regeringen, er opfyldt. 
In both cases the funds are fungible and are disbursed in instalments once the Commission is satisfied that the conditions, mainly aimed at supporting structural reforms in the economy of the beneficiary State, set out in an agreement between the Commission and the government, have been met.
MFA for EU-tiltrždelseslande, Det Vestlige Balkan og De Nye Uafhžngige Stater betragtes som et ekstraordinžrt instrument, og bistanden ydes her normalt i form af ln, hvorimod SAF for tredjelande i Middelhavsomrdet betragtes som et traditionelt instrument, og bistanden ydes her altid i formafgavebistand(jf.punkt1-5). 
However, MFA for the EU accession countries, the western Balkans and the new independent States is considered as an exceptional instrument, given mainly as loans, whereas SAF for the Mediterranean non-member States is seen as a normal instrument, always given as grants (see paragraphs 1 to 5).
Anbefaling 2 70. 
Recommendation 2 70.
Kommissionen bżr fastlžgge en mere ensartet procedure for makrożkonomisk bistand. 
The Commission should find a more harmonised approach for assistance on a macroeconomic level.
Det bżr tages op til fornyet overvejelse, om den mde, hvorp forvaltningen af disse instrumenter er spredt ud p de forskellige tjenestegrene i Kommissionen, herunder delegationernes rolle, er den rette. 
The way the management of these instruments is divided between the different CommissionŐs services, including the role of Delegations, should be re-examined.
Udformning, betingelser og kontrol af aftaler 71. 
Design, conditions and monitoring of agreements 71.
Der findes ingen klar beskrivelse af den proces, der fżrer til, at der indgs aftaler med modtagerlandene. Hvad angr MFA, drejer det sig om betingelsernes betydning for de bredere politiske mlsžtninger, f.eks. EU-tiltrždelse (jf. punkt 44). 
The process, which results in the agreements with the beneficiary countries is not clearly documented. In the case of MFA this concerns the relevance of the conditions to broader political objectives, e.g. EU accession (see paragraph 44).
For SAFŐs vedkommende savnes der en begrundet redegżrelse for det samlede bistandsbelżb og opdelingen af det i rater (jf. punkt 20). 
In the case of SAF this relates to the justification of the global amount of the assistance and its division into instalments (see paragraph 20).
I de tilfžlde, hvor betingelserne i aftalerne er de samme som IMFŐs og Verdensbankens, er Kommissionens kontrol bl.a. baseret p arbejde udfżrt af disse institutioner. 
Where conditions in agreements are common, the CommissionŐs monitoring makes use of work carried out by the IMF and the World Bank. The CommissionŐs own monitoring is intermittent.
Den kontrollerer isžr, om betingelserne er opfyldt, s udbetalingen af midlerne kan godkendes, og der er ikke tale om en lżbende kontrol af de żkonomiske og politiske forhold i det pgžldende land (jf. punkt 52-55). 
It is focused on the need to check the fulfilment of conditions in order to approve the disbursement of the funds rather than ongoing monitoring of the economic and political conditions of the country (see paragraphs 52 to 55).
Selv om de specifikke betingelser for de enkelte programmer skal vžre opfyldt, fżr der kan udbetales midler, er det forsteligt, at Kommissionen i praksis har behov for en vis manżvremargen, nr den skal vurdere modtagerstatens reelle bestržbelser p at opfylde de makrożkonomiske ml og reformmlsžtningerne. 
Although the specific conditions of the individual programmes have to be fulfilled before payments can be made, it is understandable that, in practice, the Commission needs a certain margin of manoeuvre in judging the real efforts of the beneficiary State towards the achievement of macroeconomic policy and reform objectives.
Hertil kommer, at den nogle gange skal forholde sig til begivenheder, der ikke kan forudses. 
In addition, it may sometimes have to take into account unforeseeable events.
Men der er ikke altid blevet gjort tilstržkkeligt klart opmžrksom p, at en ržkke betingelser ikke var opfyldt, eller at der havde vžret problemer, og der var ikke altid blevet lagt tilstržkkeligt pres p modtagerlandet for at f det til at ivžrksžtte korrigerende foranstaltninger (jf. punkt 22-27 og 42-45). 
However, the non-fulfilment of some conditions and the problems encountered were not always established in a transparent enough manner and corrective action was not always asked for with sufficient persistence (see paragraphs 22 to 27 and 42 to 45).
Anbefaling 3 74. 
Recommendation 3 74.
Kommissionen bżr gżre sin beslutningstagning klarere og udarbejde skriftlige retningslinier for de forskellige faser af forvaltningen af den makrożkonomiske bistand. 
The Commission should make its decision-making clearer by establishing written guidance for the various phases of the management of macroeconomic assistance.
Den bżr ogs dokumentere sine betragtninger klarere, nr den tržffer beslutning om indholdet af finansieringsaftalerne med modtagerlandene, og nr den beslutter at udbetale midler p grundlag af en vurdering af de betingelser, der er fastsat i aftalen. 
It should also more clearly document its considerations when deciding the content of the financing agreements with the beneficiary countries, as well as when deciding the disbursements on the basis of the assessment of the conditions stipulated in the agreement.
Kommissionen bżr dokumentere sin begrundelse for at frafalde betingelser i situationer, hvor betingelserne ikke er opfyldt. 
The Commission should document its justification for waivers in situations where conditions are not fulfilled.
Vurdering af partnerregeringernes budgetforvaltning og regnskabsfżrelse 75. 
Assessment of partner governmentŐs budgetary and accounting processes 75.
En forsvarlig budgetforvaltning i modtagerlandene er af afgżrende betydning under hele reformprocessen og bżr vžre en central betingelse, nr der ydes ubunden budgetstżtte. 
The quality of the budgetary processes in the beneficiary States plays a crucial role during the whole reform process and should be a key condition when attributing untied budgetary support.
En hżj grad af gennemsigtighed, regnskabspligt og ekstern kontrol med forvaltningen af offentlige midler er af vital betydning for at sikre god regeringsfżrelse og bidrage til at bekžmpe svig og korruption (jf. punkt 50). 
A high degree of transparency, accountability and external control of the management of public resources is vital for ensuring good governance and in helping to combat fraud and corruption (see paragraph 50).
Anbefaling 4 76. 
Recommendation 4 76.
Kommissionens kontrol af den finansielle forvaltnings forsvarlighed i modtagerlandene bżr forbedres betydeligt, og alle berżrte GDŐer bżr inddrages i arbejdet. 
The CommissionŐs monitoring of the quality of financial management in beneficiary countries should be considerably improved and all relevant DGs should be involved.
Nr Kommissionen skal forlade sig p BWIŐs kontrol, bżr den tage fuldt hensyn til det arbejde, disse institutioner har udfżrt p dette omrde. 
The Commission should take fully account of any work carried out by the BWI in this respect whenever the Commission is going to rely on their work.
23.5.2002 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 121/15 Evalueringer 77. 
23.5.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 121/15 Evaluations 77.
Der er ikke foretaget evalueringer (MFA) eller de evalueringer, der er foretaget, er af begržnset omfang (SAF), og det viser, at Kommissionen endnu ikke fuldt ud har gennemfżrt sin generelle politik for evaluering af Fžllesskabets udgiftsprogrammer. 
The absence of evaluations (MFA) or their limited scope (SAF) means that the Commission has not yet fully implemented its general policy for the evaluation of Community expenditure programmes.
Kommissionen udnytter sledes ikke systematisk de muligheder for at indhżsteerfaringer,somenstruktureretprocesvillehavegivet den (jf. punkt 61-65). 
The Commission therefore does not benefit systematically from the possibilities of a structured learning process (see paragraphs 61 to 65).
Anbefaling 5 78. 
Recommendation 5 78.
Kommissionen bżr regelmžssigt foretage omfattende evalueringer for at fastsl, hvilke erfaringer der kan drages fordel af med henblik p udformningen af dens politik. Disse evalueringer bżr isžr sigte p at undersżge, om reformprogrammerne er hensigtsmžssige, hvilken betydning betingelserne har haft for reformpro-cessen,oghvordandesocialeomkostningeriforbindelsemed reformprogrammerne kan begržnses. 
The Commission should regularly carry out comprehensive evaluations in order to identify what lessons can be learned for policy-making, particularly as regards the suitability of reform programmes, the relevance of its conditions to the reform process and the alleviation of the social costs of the reform programmes.
Vedtaget af Revisionsretten i Luxembourg p mżdet den 7. marts 2002. 
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 7 March 2002.
C 121/16 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 23.5.2002 3 Jordan 4 Jordan 5 Jordan (SAF I) 6 Jordan (SAF II) 7 Marokko 8 Marokko 9 Tunesien 10 Tunesien 11 Tunesien (SAF I) 12 Tunesien (SAF II) 13 Tunisia Sant 14 Libanon 1995 30 1995 20 1996 100 1999 80 1993 80 1996 120 1992 40 1996 20 1996 100 1998 80 1999 40 1999 50 230 200 100 80 180 254 656 71 % 18 % 80 I ALT 955 50 50 355 600 600 182 1 770 470 130 35 (1) Samtlige bevillinger, herunder bde SAF-udviklingsprogrammer og ikke-SAF-udviklingsprogrammer. 
C 121/16 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23.5.2002 Country Year started Amount committed SAF 1992 to 2000 Total per country SAF from Protocols SAF from MEDA funds Total SAF from MEDA funds per country Total Funds under 1 SAF as % of MEDA funds Payments made under MEDA 1996 to 2000 Amount still open under MEDA Amount still open under Protocols 70 2 Algeria 1996 125 70 95 30 20 35 1 Algeria 1992 3 Jordan 4 Jordan 5 Jordan SAF I 6 Jordan SAF II 7 Morocco 8 Morocco 1996 120 230 200 100 80 180 120 254 656 71 % 18 % 100 80 9 Tunisia 10 Tunisia 11 Tunisia (SAF I) 12 Tunisia (SAF II) 13 Tunisia Sante 14 Lebanon 1992 40 1996 20 1996 100 1998 80 1999 40 1999 50 40 20 TOTAL 955 355 182 1 770 30 470 130 35 (1) All dotations, including SAF and non-SAF development programmes.
Kilde: Revisionsretten p basis af oplysninger fra Kommissionen. 
Source: Court of Auditors based on Commission data.
280 50 955 40 220 428 51 % 27 % 34 % 80 0 120 0 0 0 100 0 40 40 40 30 20 40 20 BILAG I FINANSIERINGSOVERSIGT SAF 1992-2000 Midler i alt Belżb, der Belżb, der endnu Fżrste Bevilget SAF-SAF i henhold SAF fra Meda-Samlet SAF-under SAF i % af Betalinger endnu ikke er ikke er truffet Land bistandsr belżb Ialtpr.land tilprotokoller midler belżbfraMeda-Meda1(1) Meda-midler underMeda truffetafgżrelse afgżrelseomi 1 Algeriet 1992 70 2 Algeriet 1996 125 70 95 30 30 30 20 35 1992-2000 midlerpr.land (1996-2000) 1996-2000 omunderMeda henholdtil protokoller 195 250 12 % 30 0 0 100 0 120 120 100 80 (mio. EUR) 
1995 30 1995 20 1996 100 1999 80 1993 80 195 30 30 250 12 % 30 0 0 0 280 50 955 220 50 600 428 51 % 27 % 34 % 80 0 0 0 0 0 ANNEX I FINANCIAL EVOLUTION SAF 1992 TO 2000 120 120 100 80 40 50 600 100 40 40 40 20 MEDA 1 ( ) (1996 to 2000) (Mio EUR)
(2) Fžlles afgżrelse vedr. Armenien og Georgien. 
(2) Common decision for Armenia and Georgia.
Kilde: Revisionsretten p basis af oplysninger fra Kommissionen. 
Source: Court of Auditors on basis of Commission data.
C 121/18 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende BILAG III OPFYLDELSE AF BETINGELSER Kosovo 1. 
C 121/18 EN Official Journal of the European Communities ANNEX III FULFILMENT OF CONDITIONS Kosovo 1.
Da Kommissionen traf beslutning om at udbetale den anden rate af gavebistanden til regionens budget (15 millioner euro), fandt den ikke, at det var nżdvendigt, at Kosovo nżje havde overholdt alle betingelser. 
In Kosovo the strict respect of all conditions was not considered necessary for the decision of the Commission to propose the disbursement of the second instalment of the grant to the RegionŐs budget (15 million euro).
UNMIK havde ikke vžret i stand til at gżre de forventede fremskridt med hensyn til at konsolidere budgettet. 
UNMIK had not been able to make the progress expected in consolidating the budget.
P indtžgtssiden var de stżrste problemer, at det ikke var lykkedes at indfżre en kildeskat p 15 % (1), og at indfżrelsen af en skat p kapitalgevinster var forsinket. 
Major problems on the revenue side included the failure to introduce a wage withholding tax of 15 % (1) and the delay in introducing a profit tax.