natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I Figur 4 sammenlignes de anslede fejlforekomster p de forskellige udgiftsomrder mellem 2016 og 2018. 
Figure 4 compares the estimated levels of error in the various spending areas between 2016 and 2018.
Der gives flere oplysninger om resultaterne vedrżrende indtžgterne og de enkelte udgiftsomrder p side 21-42 og i de relevante kapitler i rsberetningen for 2018. 
Further information on results in revenue and each spending area is given on pages 21 to 42 and in the relevant chapters of the 2018 annual report.
Figur 4 Đ Sammenligning af de anslede fejlforekomster p EUŐs udgiftsomrder (2016-2018) 13 Note: Den anslede fejlforekomst er beregnet p grundlag af de kvantificerbare fejl, som vi konstaterede under vores arbejde, navnlig ved test af en stikprżve af transaktioner. 
Figure 4 Đ Comparison between estimated levels of error for EU spending areas (2016-2018) 13 Estimated level of error (%) 4.8 4.1 4.2 2.0 Competitiveness forgrowth and jobs 5.0 2016 2017 2018 3.0 2.5 2.4 2.4 Spending area Economic, social and territorial cohesion Natural resources Free from material error Administration Note: The estimated level of error is based on quantifiable errors, which we identified through our work, notably the testing of a sample of transactions.
Vi anvender statistiske standardteknikker til at ansl fejlforekomsten (jf. bilag 1.1 til kapitel 1 i rsberetningen for 2018). 
We use standard statistical techniques to draw this sample and to estimate the level of error (see Chapter 1, Annex 1.1 to the 2018 annual report).
Sammenligning mellem Kommissionens skżn over risikobelżbet ved betalingen og vores skżn over fejlforekomsten Som led i attestationstilgangen med henblik p vores revisionserklžring sammenlignede vi vores skżn over fejlforekomsten med Kommissionens skżn over risikobelżbet ved betalingen, som er et skżn over omfanget af de betalinger, der p betalingstidspunktet ikke var i overensstemmelse med de gžldende regler. 
Comparison between the CommissionŐs estimate of the amount at risk at payment and our estimated level of error In the context of the attestation approach for our statement of assurance, we compared our estimated level of error with the CommissionŐs estimate of the amount at risk at payment, which represents its estimate of the amount, at the moment of payment, that has not been paid in accordance with the applicable rules.
Hvert generaldirektorat (GD) i Kommissionen udarbejder en rlig aktivitetsrapport. 
Each Commission Directorate-General (DG) produces an annual activity report.
Den indeholder en erklžring, hvor generaldirektżren erklžrer, at han/hun har sikkerhed for, at rapporten pržsenterer de finansielle oplysninger korrekt, og at transaktionerne under hans/hendes ansvar er lovlige og formelt rigtige. 
This includes a declaration in which the Director-General provides assurance that the report properly presents financial information and that transactions under his/her responsibility are legal and regular.
Alle GDŐerne foretog skżn over fejlforekomsten, som ligger tžt p vores p omrderne ČKonkurrenceevneÇ og ČNaturressourcerÇ, men er lavere end vores p omrdet ČSamhżrighedÇ. 
All Directorates-General provided estimates of their levels of error, which are close to our estimated level of error for ÔCompetitivenessŐ and ÔNatural resourcesŐ and lower than ours for ÔCohesionŐ.
Samlet set er Kommissionens skżn over risikobelżbet ved betalingen for 2018 p 1,7 %. 
Overall, the CommissionŐs estimate of the amount at risk at payment for 2018 is 1.7 %.
Dette ligger under vores skżn over fejlforekomsten, der ligger i et interval mellem 1,8 % og 3,4 %. 
This is below our error estimate which is in a range between 1.8 % and 3.4 %.
Vores skżn over fejlforekomsten i EU-budgettet er derfor ikke en mling af svig, ineffektivitet eller spild. 
Our estimate of the level of error in the EU budget is therefore neither a measure of fraud nor of inefficiency or waste.
Det er et skżn over, hvor mange af midlerne der ikke burde have vžret udbetalt, fordi de ikke blev anvendt i overensstemmelse med de gžldende regler og bestemmelser. 
Rather, it is an estimate of the money that should not have been paid out because it was not used in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations.
Nr vi under vores revisionsarbejde stżder p tilfžlde af formodet svig, indberetter vi de pgžldende sager til OLAF, som herefter afgżr, om det vil efterforske og fżlge op p disse sager, i relevante tilfžlde i samarbejde med de nationale retsmyndigheder. 
We report all suspected fraud cases detected during our audit work to the EUŐs anti-fraud office OLAF, which then decides whether it will investigate and follow up these cases, where appropriate in co-operation with national judicial authorities.
I lżbet af 2018 sendte vi OLAF ni sager med mistanke om svig (2017: 13). 
During 2018, we communicated to OLAF nine cases of suspected fraud (2017: 13).
Mistankerne om svig vedrżrte kunstigt skabte betingelser for at modtage EU-finansiering, anmeldelse af omkostninger, som ikke opfyldte stżttekriterierne, og uregelmžssigheder i forbindelse med udbud. 
The instances of suspected fraud concerned the artificial creation of the necessary conditions for EU financing, the declaration of costs not meeting the eligibility criteria and procurement irregularities.
Nogle af disse sager med mistanke om svig omfattede adskillige uregelmžssigheder. Vil du vide mere? 
Some of these suspected fraud cases involved several irregularities. Want to know more?
Alle oplysninger om de vžsentligste revisionsresultater kan findes i kapitel 1 i vores rsberetning for 2018. rsberetningen i sin helhed kan findes p vores websted (eca.europa.eu). 
Full information on the main findings can be found in Chapter 1 of our 2018 annual report.
14 Udfordringer for den budgetmžssige og żkonomiske forvaltning Betydelig stigning i betalingsanmodningerne vedrżrende ESI-fondene I 2018 udnyttede EU nžsten alle forpligtelses-og betalingsbevillingerne fuldt ud. 
14 Budgetary and financial management faces challenges Significant increase in claims for the ESI funds In 2018, the EU used both commitment and payment appropriations almost entirely.
Af det disponible forpligtelsesbelżb p 160,7 milliarder euro blev 159,9 milliarder euro (99,5 %) anvendt, og af det disponible betalingsbelżb p 144,8 milliarder euro blev 142,7 milliarder euro (98,6 %) anvendt. 
Out of Ű160.7 billion available for commitments, Ű159.9 billion were used (99.5 %) and of the Ű144.8 billion available for payments, Ű142.7 billion were made (98.6 %).
Antallet af betalingsanmodninger vedrżrende ESI-fondene i 2018, som tegner sig for ca. 43 % af FFR for 2014-2020, er steget betydeligt. 
The number of ESI funds claims in 2018, which account for around 43 % of the 2014-2020 MFF, has significantly increased.
Dette skyldes primžrt, at niveauet for medlemsstaternes betalingsanmodninger vedrżrende ESI-fondene i de fżrste r af programmerne for 2014-2020 var relativt lavt. 
This is mainly because of the relatively low level of ESI fund payment claims by Member States in the early years of the 2014-2020 programmes.
Gennemfżrelsen af FFRŐen er pvirket af forsinkelser i gennemfżrelsen af ESI-fondene Forsinkelser i gennemfżrelsen af ESI-fondene pvirker fortsat de sidste r af denne FFR. 
Implementation of the MFF affected by delays in the implementation of ESI funds Delays in the implementation of the ESI fundsŐ continue to affect the final years of this MFF.
Betalingsanmodninger vedrżrende et stort belżb er blevet forsinket og vil blive indgivet i de kommende r. 
Payment claims for a substantial value have been delayed and will be submitted in future years.
Dette har pvirket anvendelsen af forfinansiering og de uindfriede forpligtelser og vil pvirke behovet for betalingsbevillinger i begyndelsen af den nžste FFR. 
This has affected the use of pre-financing and outstanding commitments, and will affect payment appropriation needs at the start of the next MFF.
Vi anbefaler Kommissionen at tržffe foranstaltninger til at undg unżdigt pres p niveauet for betalingsbevillinger i de fżrste r af FFR for 2021-2027. 
We recommend that the Commission takes measures to avoid undue pressure on the level of payment appropriations in the first years of the 2021-2027 MFF.
Absorptionen af ESI-fondenes midler tog fart i 2018, det femte r i den nuvžrende FFR. 
The absorption of ESI funds gained momentum in 2018, the fifth year of the current MFF.
Ved udgangen af ret var der dog i gennemsnit kun blevet betalt 27,3 % af de samlede tildelinger for hele FFRŐen til medlemsstaterne, mens der ved udgangen af 2011, dvs. det tilsvarende r i den foregende FFR, var blevet betalt 33,4 %. 
By the end of the year, on average only 27.3 % of total allocations for the whole MFF had been paid to the Member States, compared with 33.4 % by the end of 2011, the corresponding year of the previous MFF.
Den lave absorption af ESI-fondenes midler har bidraget til at żge ESI-fondenes uindfriede forpligtelser. 
The low absorption of ESI Funds has contributed to increasing ESI funds outstanding commitments.
Figur 5 viser de uindfriede forpligtelser vedrżrende ESI-fondene pr. medlemsstat, bde som et belżb i euro og som en procentdel af medlemsstatens offentlige udgifter i 2018. 
Figure 5 shows each Member StateŐs ESI funds outstanding commitments, both as an amount in euros and as a percentage of its 2018 general government expenditure.
I vores kortfattede sagsgennemgang om uindfriede forpligtelser i EU-budgettet fremhžver vi de betydelige risici, som et hżjt niveau af uindfriede forpligtelser kan skabe for EU-budgettet. 15 
In our rapid case review on outstanding commitments in the EU budget, we highlight the significant risks that a high level of outstanding commitments can create for the EU budget and present possible solutions. 15
Stigningen i garantier żger EU-budgettets risikoeksponering Omfanget af garantier med stżtte fra EU-budgettet er steget i de seneste r, hvilket hovedsagelig skyldes oprettelsen af garantien under Den Europžiske Fond for Strategiske Investeringer (EFSI) og garantien under Den Europžiske Fond for Bžredygtig Udvikling (EFSD). 
The increase in guarantees adds to the EU budgetŐs exposure to risk Guarantees supported by the EU budget have increased in recent years, mainly due to the addition of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) guarantee and the European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) guarantee.
Ved udgangen af 2018 udgjorde den faktiske garantieksponering 92,8 milliarder euro. 
In total, the actual guarantee exposure at the end of 2018 was Ű92.8 billion.
De tab, som Kommissionen forventer, er džkket af garantifondene, som den nye FFR vil samle i en fžlles hensžttelsesfond. 
The level of losses expected by the Commission is covered by guarantee funds, which the new MFF will pool into a common provisioning fund.
Vi anbefaler, at Kommissionen, s snart den fžlles hensžttelsesfond er oprettet, sikrer effektiv forvaltning og ajourfżrt overvgning af EU-budgettets eksponering for de dermed forbundne garantier og baserer sin beregning af den effektive tilfżrselssats p en forsigtig metode, der bygger p anerkendt god praksis. 
We recommend that the Commission, as soon as the common provisioning fund is established, ensures the effective management and up-to-date monitoring of the EU budgetŐs exposure to the related guarantees, and bases its calculation of the effective provisioning rate on a prudent methodology based on recognised good practice.
Den Europžiske Investeringsbank - En integrerende del af EUŐs struktur, som dog har sine egne ansvarlighedsordninger Den Europžiske Investeringsbank (EIB-Gruppen) yder ln, garantier og andre former for stżtte uden fortjeneste for żje med henblik p at fremme EUŐs politiske ml. 
The European Investment Bank Đ an integral part of the EUŐs architecture, but different accountability arrangements The European Investment Bank Group (the EIB Group) grants loans, guarantees and other kinds of support on a non-profit-making basis in order to serve EU policy objectives.
Ved udgangen af 2018 udgjorde de samlede udestende ln ydet af EIB-Gruppen 536 milliarder euro (2017: 548 milliarder euro). 
At the end of 2018, the aggregate total of outstanding loans granted by the EIB Group was Ű536 billion (2017: Ű548 billion).
EIB-Gruppen er ikke en EU-institution. 
The EIB Group is not an EU institution.
For at tage hensyn til dens sžrlige art har den andre ledelses-og forvaltningsordninger end dem, der gžlder for EU-budgettet. 
In order to take account of its special nature, it has different management and governance arrangements compared to the rest of the EU budget.
I de seneste r har EU i stigende grad gjort brug af finansielle instrumenter og budgetgarantier stillet til EIB-Gruppen. 
In recent years, the EU has increasingly made use of financial instruments and budgetary guarantees provided to the EIB Group.
Denne tendens forventes at fortsžtte under den nžste FFR. 
This trend is expected to continue during the next MFF.
P nuvžrende tidspunkt džkker vores revisionsmandat ikke de af EIB-Gruppens operationer, som ikke finansieres over EU-budgettet, men tjener de samme EU-ml. 
At present, our audit mandate does not cover EIB Group operations that are not financed by the EU budget but serve the same EU objectives.
Dette betyder, at Revisionsretten ikke er i stand til at give et fuldstžndigt billede af forbindelsen mellem EIB-Gruppens operationer og EU-budgettet. 
This means that the ECA is unable to provide a full picture of the link between EIB Group operations and the EU budget.
I vores briefingpapir om fremtiden for EUŐs finanser foreslog vi, at vi ogs bżr f til opgave at revidere de EIB-operationer, der ikke er relateret til EU-budgettet. 
In our briefing paper on the future of EU finances, we proposed that we should also be invited to audit the EIBŐs non-EU-budget-related operations.
Europa-Parlamentet stżttede vores forslag i sin beslutning om den rlige rapport om kontrol med EIBŐs finansielle aktiviteter for 2017. 
The European Parliament supported our proposal in its resolution on the Annual Report on the control of the financial activities of the EIB for 2017.
Vi anbefaler Kommissionen at give budgetmyndigheden relevante oplysninger til stżtte for dens arbejde med kontrol af EIB-Gruppen og dens operationer og samtidig żge gennemsigtigheden af disse operationer. Vil du vide mere? 
We recommend that the Commission provides the budgetary authority with relevant information to support its work on the scrutiny of the EIB Group and its operations while also increasing the transparency of such operations. Want to know more?
Alle oplysninger om de vžsentligste revisionsresultater vedrżrende den budgetmžssige og żkonomiske forvaltning kan findes i kapitel 2 i vores rsberetning for 2018. 17 
Full information on the main findings on budgetary and financial management can be found in Chapter 2 of our 2018 annual report. 17
Behov for yderligere vžgt p EU-udgifternes performance Hvert r analyserer vi en ržkke aspekter vedrżrende performance: De resultater, der er opnet med EU-budgettet, som gennemfżres af Kommissionen i samarbejde med medlemsstaterne. 
Further emphasis on performance of the EU spending needed Each year we analyse a number of aspects relating to performance, the results achieved by the EU budget, which is implemented by the Commission in cooperation with the Member States.
I r har vi specifikt set p EU-budgettets resultatindikatorer, de vigtigste resultater fra vores sžrberetninger om performance i 2018 og gennemfżrelsen af de anbefalinger, vi fremsatte i vores sžrberetninger i 2015. 
This year we have looked specifically at the EU budget performance indicators, the main results from our 2018 special reports on performance and the implementation of the recommendations we made in the special reports we published in 2015.
Resultatindikatorerne viser betydelig variation i resultaterne og antyder moderate fremskridt generelt Vi gennemgik de kvantitative oplysninger, der fremgr af resultatindikatorerne. 
Performance indicators show significant variation in achievements and suggest moderate progress overall We reviewed the quantitative information provided by performance indicators.
Til vores analyse udvalgte vi 22 af de 60 udgiftsprogrammer, idet vi valgte de fire programmer, som havde de stżrste planlagte udgifter for hvert af udgiftsomrderne i den flerrige finansielle ramme (FFR) for 2014-2020, plus to programmer for sžrlige instrumenter. 
For our analysis, we selected 22 out of the 60 spending programmes, choosing the four programmes with the highest planned expenditure for each 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) heading, plus two programmes for special instruments.
De 22 udvalgte programmer džkkede 97 % af den finansielle programmering for syvrsperioden. 
The 22 selected programmes covered 97 % of the financial programming for the seven-year period.
Vi konstaterede, at indikatorerne viser betydelig variation i resultaterne og moderate fremskridt generelt. 
We found that the indicators show significant variation in achievements and moderate progress overall.
Den sene og langsomme start for bde samhżrighedsprogrammet og programmet for udvikling af landdistrikterne var en vigtig begržnsende faktor. 
The late, slow start for both the cohesion and rural development programmes was an important limiting factor.
Indikatorerne gav ikke altid et godt billede af de faktiske fremskridt Vores analyse afslżrede svagheder i EU-budgettets resultatindikatorer. 
Indicators did not always provide a good picture of actual progress Our analysis revealed weaknesses in the framework of EU budget performance indicators.
Mange indikatorer var ikke godt valgt, f.eks. fordi de ikke mlte EU-budgettets resultater, eller fordi de hovedsagelig fokuserede p input og output frem for resultater og effekt. 
Many indicators were not well chosen for instance because they did not measure the achievements of the EU budget or because they were mostly focused on inputs and outputs rather than results and impacts.
Det var endvidere ikke muligt at beregne fremskridt vedrżrende mange indikatorer, og nr det var muligt, var dataene undertiden ikke af tilstržkkelig kvalitet. 
Furthermore, progress could not be calculated for many indicators and when it could, the data available was sometimes of insufficient quality.
For s vidt angr mlene bemžrkede vi, at mange af dem ikke er ambitiżse nok. 
As regards the targets we noted that a number of them are not sufficiently ambitious.
Vi fremsatte anbefalinger til Kommissionen vedrżrende udvžlgelsen af indikatorer, fastsžttelsen af ml, opnelsen af rettidige oplysninger og rapporteringen om resultater. 
We made recommendations to the Commission in relation to the selection of indicators, the setting of targets, obtaining timely information and the reporting on achievements.
35 sžrberetninger om forskellige omrder af EUŐs udgifter offentliggjort i 2018 I overensstemmelse med vores strategi for 2018-2020 har vi sat stżrre fokus p at vurdere performance i forbindelse med EUŐs indsats. 
Thirty-five special reports across the different areas of EU spending published in 2018 In line with our 2018-2020 strategy, we have been increasing our focus on assessing performance in EU action.
I vores sžrberetninger undersżger vi, om mlene for udvalgte EU-politikker og -programmer er opfyldt, om resultaterne er opnet p en effektiv og produktiv mde, og om EU-finansieringen har tilfżrt mervžrdi - dvs. om den har leveret mere, end der kunne vžre opnet udelukkende med foranstaltninger p nationalt niveau. 
In our special reports, we examine whether the objectives of selected EU policies and programmes have been met, whether results have been achieved effectively and efficiently and whether the EU funding has added value Đ i.e. whether it has delivered more than could be achieved with actions at the national level alone.
Figur 6 viser alle de 35 sžrberetninger, der blev offentliggjort i 2018. 18 
Figure 6 presents all 35 special reports published in 2018. 18
Kommissionen gennemfżrer en stor del af vores anbefalinger Vi undersżger hvert r, i hvilken udstržkning Kommissionen har truffet korrigerende foranstaltninger med relation til vores anbefalinger. 
The Commission implements a high proportion of our recommendations We review annually the extent to which the Commission has taken corrective action related to our recommendations.
I overensstemmelse med vores strategi for 2018-2020 vil vi fżlge op p alle de forvaltningsrevisionsbaserede anbefalinger, som vi rettede til Kommissionen tre r tidligere. 
In line with our strategy for 2018-2020, we will be following up all performance audit recommendations we made to the Commission three years earlier.
Dette rs opfżlgningsanalyse omhandlede 184 anbefalinger, som vi fremsatte i de 25 sžrberetninger, vi offentliggjorde i 2015. 
This yearŐs analysis of follow-up covered 184 recommendations issued in the 25 special reports published in 2015.
Kommissionen har gennemfżrt 76 % af anbefalingerne fuldt ud eller i de fleste henseender. 
The Commission has implemented 76 % of the recommendations fully or in most respects.
Vi konstaterede, at 11 anbefalinger ikke var blevet gennemfżrt (jf. figur 7). 
We found that 11 recommendations had not been implemented at all (see Figure 7).
Figur 7 Đ Tre fjerdedele af de anbefalinger, vi fremsatte i 2015, er blevet gennemfżrt fuldt ud eller i de fleste henseender. 
Figure 7 Đ Three quarters of our recommendation issued in 2015 have been implemented fully or in most respect 20 Want to know more?
Alle oplysninger om de vžsentligste revisionsresultater vedrżrende EU-budgettets performance kan findes i kapitel 3 i vores rsberetning for 2018. 
Full information on the main findings on the performance of the EU budget can be found in Chapter 3 of our 2018 annual report.
Nžrmere oplysninger om indtžgterne og udgiftsomrderne Indtžgter 159,3 milliarder euro Hvad vi reviderede Revisionen omfattede EU-budgettets indtžgter, som finansierer EUŐs udgifter. 
A closer look at revenue and spending areas Revenue Ű159.3 billion What we audited Our audit covered the revenue side of the EU budget, which finances the EUŐs expenditure.
Vi undersżgte en ržkke centrale kontrolsystemer vedrżrende forvaltning af egne indtžgter og en stikprżve af indtžgtstransaktioner. 
We examined certain key control systems for managing own resources, and a sample of revenue transactions.
De bidrag fra medlemsstaterne, der er baseret p deres bruttonationalindkomst (BNI), udgjorde 66 % af EUŐs samlede indtžgter i 2018, mens indtžgter fra moms udgjorde 11 %. 
Contributions from Member States based on their gross national income (GNI) accounted for 66 % of the EUŐs total revenue in 2018, while revenue from value added tax (VAT) accounted for 11 %.
Disse bidrag beregnes p grundlag af makrożkonomiske statistikker og overslag fra medlemsstaterne. 
These contributions are calculated using macroeconomic statistics and estimates provided by Member States.
De traditionelle egne indtžgter, hovedsagelig told p importerede varer, som medlemsstaternes myndigheder opkržver p vegne af EU, udgjorde yderligere 13 % af EUŐs indtžgter. 
Traditional own resources (TOR), consisting mainly of customs duties on imports collected by Member State administrations on the EUŐs behalf, provided a further 13 % of EU revenue.
De resterende 10 % kom fra andre kilder (f.eks. bidrag og tilbagebetalinger i forbindelse med EU-aftaler og - programmer, morarenter og bżder samt andre indtžgter). 
The remaining 10 % came from other sources (e.g. contributions and refunds arising from EU agreements and programmes, interest on late payments and fines, and other revenue).
Hvad vi konstaterede Forebyggende og korrigerende foranstaltninger De indtžgtsrelaterede systemer, vi undersżgte, var generelt effektive, mens de centrale interne kontroller vedrżrende traditionelle egne indtžgter, som vi vurderede i Kommissionen og i visse medlemsstater, var delvis effektive. 
What we found Preventive and corrective measures Overall, the revenue-related systems we examined were effective, while the key internal TOR controls we assessed at the Commission and in certain Member States were partially effective.