natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen bør sikre, at ansvarsfordelingen optimeres under hensyntagen til de ændringer, der er planlagt under Horisont 2020. 
The Commission should ensure that the distribution of responsibilities is optimised given the changes envisaged under Horizon 2020.
Det vil gøre det let at udveksle bedste praksis mellem tjenesterne og skabe lige vilkår, så man direkte kan sammenligne resultaterne i forskellige organisatoriske enheder, der gennemfører det samme program. 
This will allow for an easy exchange of best practices across the services and will create a level playing field, in which the performance of different organisational entities implementing the same programme can be directly compared.
Det vil også give den fordel, at kompleksiteten reduceres, og rammeprogrammet dermed kan blive mere effektivt (for eksempel vil det blive lettere at anvende elektroniske workflowværktøjer). 
It will also bring the benefit of reduced complexity, which in turn can make the framework programme more efficient (for instance, the set-up of electronic workflow tools will be easier).
Kvalitetskontrollen i forbindelse med udvælgelse og opfølgning af projekter fungerer godt. 
The quality controls applied to the selection and follow-up of the projects function well.
Kommissionens bedømmelsesmetode er i overensstemmelse med de bedste internationale praksis. 
The Commission’s evaluation approach follows best international practice.
Med hensyn til den finansielle kontrol adskiller RP7-modellen sig væsentligt fra de modeller, der anvendes i de nationale finansieringsorganer. 
As regards the financial controls, the FP7 control model differs significantly from those found in national funding agencies.
RP7-modellen anvender i højere grad kontrol efter betaling og lægger mindre vægt på risikoen for fejl. 
It places greater reliance on controls after payment and attaches less importance to the risk of errors.
De nationale finansieringsorganers risikobaserede kontrolstrategi gør det muligt for dem at fokusere deres kontrolindsats på de modtagere, der udgør en højere risiko, og lette kontrolbyrden for modtagere, der udgør en lavere risiko (jf. punkt 67-83). Særberetning nr. 2/2013 – Har Kommissionen sørget for, at syvende rammeprogram for forskning gennemføres effektivt? 
The risk-based control strategies of national funding agencies allow them to focus their control effort on those beneficiaries which constitute a higher risk and ease the burden of controls on less risky beneficiaries (see paragraphs 67 to 83). Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research?
Begge de nye instrumenter, som Retten analyserede i forbindelse med denne revision, har vist, at de har potentiale til at forbedre forsknings-støtteordningerne. 
Both new instruments analysed by the Court in this audit showed their potential to enhance the research funding landscape.
De har dækket de behov, som de blev oprettet for at dække. 
They have met the needs for which they were created.
Somme tider har de haft stort held med at tiltrække en bestemt gruppe modtagere (f.eks. SMV’er). 
Sometimes they have been very successful in attracting a specific group of beneficiaries (e.g. SMEs).
Gennemførelsen af FTI’erne har imidlertid været hæmmet af et alt for komplekst retsgrundlag (jf. punkt 84-93). 
However, the implementation of JTIs has suffered from an overly complex legal framework (see paragraphs 84 to 93).
52 ANBEFALING 5 Kommissionen bør sørge for, at dens kontrolaktiviteter bliver mere risikobaserede. 
52 RECOMMENDATION 5 The Commission should make its control activities more risk-driven.
Det endelige mål bør være at koncentrere kontrollen om de modtagere, der anses for at udgøre en højere risiko, og lette byrden for modtagere, der udgør en lavere risiko. 
The ultimate objective should be to focus its controls on those beneficiaries which are considered to constitute a higher risk and ease the burden on less risky beneficiaries.
Modtagerne bør inddeles i kategorier på grundlag af deres generelle risikoprofil og Kommissionens erfaringer med deres kontrolmiljø. 
The beneficiaries should be classified into categories based on their general risk profile and the Commission’s experience with the beneficiary’s control environment.
Samarbejde med nationale finansieringsorganer kunne give yderligere viden om risikoforhold og potentielt også føre til en mindskelse af kontrolbyrden for nogle modtagere. 
Cooperation with national funding agencies could provide further intelligence on beneficiaries’ risk and could also potentially lead to a reduction in the control burden placed on some beneficiaries.
Hvad angår efterfølgende kontrol bør Kommissionen udvide sin repræsentative stikprøve af kontroller, så den dækker alle dele af RP7. 
As regards the ex post controls, the Commission should extend its single representative sample of controls so that it covers all parts of FP7.
ANBEFALING 6 Retten anbefaler, at budgetmyndigheden og Kommissionen tilpasser restgrundlaget for FTI’erne (og eventuelle fremtidige instrumenter af samme karakter) efter disses medarbejderantal. 
RECOMMENDATION 6 The Court recommends that the budgetary authorities and the Commission bring the legal framework of JTIs (and of any future similar instruments) into line with their staff complement.
Navnlig bør krav, der ikke direkte bidrager til at sikre korrekt kontrol, rationaliseres. 
In particular, requirements which do not directly serve the purpose of ensuring proper control should be rationalised.
Den administrerende direktør, som er ansvarlig for den daglige ledelse, bør have flere beføjelser, så bestyrelsen kan koncentrere sig udelukkende om operationelle og strategiske spørgsmål. 
The powers of the executive director responsible for the day-to-day management should be increased, enabling the governing board to focus solely on operational and strategic matters.
Risikoen forbundet med RSFF og den mulige fortrængningseffekt må tages omhyggeligt i betragtning. 
The risk and possible crowding out effect of the RSFF must be carefully considered.
Kommissionen har ikke i tilstrækkelig grad dokumenteret, at RSFF-finansiering fører til investeringer ud over dem, som modtagerne alligevel ville have foretaget uden offentlig støtte (jf. punkt 94-97). Særberetning nr. 2/2013 – Har Kommissionen sørget for, at syvende rammeprogram for forskning gennemføres effektivt? 
The Commission has not sufficiently demonstrated that RSFF funding leads to investments above the level that beneficiaries would have undertaken, without public money anyway (see paragraphs 94 to 97). Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research?
53 ANBEFALING 7 For at maksimere RSFF’s effekt og minimere risikoen for fortrængning bør Kommissionen dokumentere, at instrumentet er målrettet modtagere, der ikke kan opnå lånefinansiering fra kommercielle udlånere og andre udlånere. 
53 RECOMMENDATION 7 To maximise the impact of the RSFF and minimise the risk of crowding out, the Commission needs to demonstrate that it targets those beneficiaries which are unable to secure loan financing from commercial and other lenders.
Desuden bør retsgrundlaget give en klarere beskrivelse af ordningerne for risikodeling mellem Kommissionen og EIB, sådan som det er tilfældet i forbindelse med nogle af de andre finansielle instrumenter, der forvaltes af Kommissionen. 
Furthermore, the risk-sharing arrangements between the Commission and the EIB should be more clearly set out in the legal basis as is the case for some other financial instruments managed by the Commission.
Vedtaget af Afdeling IV, der ledes af Louis GALEA, medlem af Revisionsretten, i Luxembourg på mødet den 19. marts 2013. 
This Report was adopted by Chamber IV, headed by Mr Louis GALEA, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 19 March 2013.
På Revisionsrettens vegne Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Formand Særberetning nr. 2/2013 – Har Kommissionen sørget for, at syvende rammeprogram for forskning gennemføres effektivt? 
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research?
BILAG I OVERBLIK OVER REVISIONSMETODEN 54 Retten undersøgte, om Kommissionen har sikret, at RP7 gennemføres effektivt. 
ANNEX I OVERVIEW OF THE AUDIT APPROACH 54 The audit examined whether the Commission has ensured an efficient implementation of FP7.
2/2013 – Har Kommissionen sørget for, at syvende rammeprogram for forskning gennemføres effektivt? 55 BILAG I BESKRIVELSE AF METODERNE TIL INDSAMLING AF REVISIONSBEVIS FORUNDERSØGELSE 1. 
Special Report No 2/2013 Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research? 55 ANNEX I DESCRIPTION OF THE AUDIT EVIDENCE COLLECTION METHODS PRELIMINARY STUDY 1.
Før hovedundersøgelsen blev påbegyndt, gennemførte Retten en forundersøgelse for at finde frem til de centrale risici, der spiller en rolle med hensyn til effektiv gennemførelse af RP7. 
Prior to undertaking the main research study, a preliminary study was conducted to identify the key risks related to efficient implementation of FP7.
Arbejdet byggede på skrivebordsundersøgelser og samtaler med de ansatte i Kommissionen, der beskæftiger sig med de væsentligste af RP7’s gennemførelsesområder, samt personale, der beskæftiger sig med forskningsspørgsmål i en række faste repræsentationer, personale fra de nationale forbindelseskontorer vedrørende forskning og innovation i Bruxelles og repræsentanter for centrale modtagere såsom universiteter, forskningsorganisationer og private virksomheder. 
This exploratory work was based on desk research and interviews with Commission staff involved in the main areas of FP7 implementation, staff dealing with research topics in a number of permanent representations, staff from national research and innovation liaison offices in Brussels and representatives of key beneficiaries such as universities, research organisations and private companies.
BENCHMARKINGBESØG I DE NATIONALE FINANSIERINGSORGANER 2. 
BENCHMARKING VISITS TO NATIONAL FUNDING AGENCIES 2.
For at kunne udføre en komparativ analyse udvalgte Retten på baggrund af kvaliteten af deres systemer for forskningsfinansiering fem lande for at sammenligne disses systemer med RP7-reglerne for deltagelse og Kommissionens processer. 
Five countries were selected for comparative analysis, taking into account the quality of the country’s funding system for research, with the aim of comparing to FP7 rules for participation and Commission’s processes.
I disse fem lande blev der udvalgt i alt ti organer for forskningsfinansiering ved hjælp af tre hovedkriterier: størrelsen af budgettet for de forvaltede finansieringsordninger, at finansieringsmetoderne var delvist identiske, og at ordningerne var anerkendt som værende af højeste kvalitet. 
In these five countries, a total of 10 agencies for funding research were identified using three main selection criteria: the budgetary size of the funding schemes managed, the similarity of funding approach and the recognised excellence of the schemes.
Retten besøgte følgende organer: ο i Tyskland: det tyske forskningsfællesskab (DFG), forbundsministeriet for økonomi og teknologi og Brandenburgs ministerium for økonomi og europæiske anliggender ο i Det Forenede Kongerige: forskningsråd, Technology Strategy Board og agenturer for regionaludvikling ο i Frankrig: det nationale forskningsagentur ο i USA: National Science Foundation (NSF) og energiministeriet ο i Schweiz: den schweiziske nationalfond (SNF). Særberetning nr. 2/2013 – Har Kommissionen sørget for, at syvende rammeprogram for forskning gennemføres effektivt? 
The following funding agencies were visited: ο in Germany: the German Science Foundation (DFG), the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology and the Ministry for Economics and European Affairs of Brandenburg (Managing Authority for Structural Funds); ο in the United Kingdom: research councils, the Technology Strategy Board and regional development agencies; ο in France: the French National Research Agency; ο in the United States of America: the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Department of Energy; and ο in Switzerland: the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF). Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research?
56 BILAG I SPØRGESKEMA TIL MODTAGERE 3. 
56 ANNEX I QUESTIONNAIRE TO BENEFICIARIES 3.
En stikprøve på over 300 modtagere blev bedt om i et elektronisk spørgeskema at kommentere aspekter med stor betydning for gennemførelsen af RP7. 
A sample of more than 300 beneficiaries was asked to comment on aspects important to FP7 implementation, via an electronic questionnaire.
Stikprøven blev udtaget blandt centrale RP7-modtagere fra hver kategori af modtagere (højere læreanstalter, forskningsinstitutioner, erhvervslivet, private enheder, SMV’er). 
The sample was drawn from the key beneficiaries of FP7 within each category of beneficiaries (higher education sector, research institutions, industry, private entities, SMEs).
De udvalgte modtagere tegner sig for næsten halvdelen af RP7-budgettet. 
The selected beneficiaries are recipients of almost half of the FP7 budget.
40 % af de adspurgte besvarede spørgeskemaet. 
Around 40 % of the addressees submitted their responses.
DELVIS STRUKTUREREDE SAMTALER MED DE ANSATTE I KOMMISSIONEN, DER ER INVOLVERET I GENNEMFØRELSEN AF RP7 4. 
SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS WITH THE COMMISSION STAFF INVOLVED IN FP7 IMPLEMENTATION 4.
Retten udvalgte i alt otte af Kommissionens direktorater og/eller tjenester, som blev besøgt under revisionen: ο Direktorat H — Luft-og rumfartsindustri, global miljø-og sikkerhedsovervågning, sikkerheds-og forsvarsindustri i GD for Erhvervspolitik ο Direktorat E — Digitalt indhold og kognitive systemer i GD for Informationssamfundet og Medier (nu direktorat A i GD for Kommunikationsnet, Indhold og Teknologi) ο Direktorat G — Komponenter og systemer i GD for Informationssamfundet og Medier (nu direktorat G i GD for Kommunikationsnet, Indhold og Teknologi) ο Direktorat E — Bioteknologi, Landbrug, Fødevarer i GD for Forskning og Innovation ο Direktorat F — Sundhed i GD for Forskning og Innovation ο Direktorat G — Industriteknologi i GD for Forskning og Innovation ο Direktorat I — Miljø i GD for Forskning og Innovation ο Forvaltningsorganet for Forskning — Rumforskning og sikkerhedsforskning. 
In total eight Commission directorates and/or services were selected to be visited during the audit: ο Directorate H — Aerospace, Global Monitoring for Environment and Security, Security and Defence in DG Enterprise and Industry; ο Directorate E — Digital Content and Cognitive Systems in DG Information Society and Media (now Directorate A in DG Communications Networks, Content and Technology); ο Directorate G — Components and Systems in DG Information Society and Media (now Directorate G in DG Communications Networks, Content and Technology); ο Directorate E — Biotechnologies, Agriculture, Food in DG Directorate Research and Innovation ο Directorate F — Health in DG Research and Innovation; ο Directorate G — Industrial Technologies in DG Research and Innovation; ο Directorate I — Environment in DG Research and Innovation; ο the Research Executive Agency — Space and security research.
I hvert direktorat gennemførte revisionsholdet delvis strukturerede samtaler med lederne af administrations- og finansenheden, enheden for horisontal koordinering (hvis en sådan fandtes) og to operationelle enheder med ansvar for bedømmelse og overvågning af projekternes videnskabelige fremskridt. 
In each directorate, the audit team arranged for semi-structured interviews with the managers of the administrative and financial unit, the horizontal coordination unit (if existing) and two operational units responsible for conducting the evaluation and monitoring of the scientific progress of the projects.
Endvidere gennemførte revisionsholdet en række samtaler med nøgleansatte i GD’erne/tjenesterne med henblik på at opnå revisionsbevis for, hvordan GD’erne/tjenesterne forvalter deres interne processer. Særberetning nr. 2/2013 – Har Kommissionen sørget for, at syvende rammeprogram for forskning gennemføres effektivt? 
Furthermore, the audit team conducted a set of interviews with the key personnel in each DG/service with the aim of obtaining audit evidence on how the DGs/services manage their internal processes. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research?
57 BILAG I SKRIVEBORDSGENNEMGANG AF EN STIKPRØVE AF PROJEKTER 6. 
57 ANNEX I DESK REVIEW OF A SAMPLE OF PROJECTS 6.
Retten udtog en stikprøve på 30 koordinatorer med projekter fra forskellige tjenester for at analysere Kommissionens procedurer set fra modtagernes synspunkt. 
A sample of 30 coordinators with projects from multiple services was drawn to analyse the Commission procedures from the perspective of the beneficiaries.
Analysen blev brugt til at identificere tilfælde, som kan illustrere forskelle i procedurerne set fra modtagernes synspunkt, til at klassificere almindelige årsager til forsinkelser i forhandlingen af projekter og til at vurdere, hvordan centrale kontroller til sikring af udgiftskvaliteten fungerede. 
The analysis was used to identify cases which can illustrate the variability of procedures from the beneficiaries’ perspective, to classify common causes of delays in negotiation of projects and to assess the operation of the key controls related to ensuring the quality of spending.
SPØRGESKEMA TIL MODTAGERE AF RSFF-LÅN OG REPRÆSENTANTER FOR FTI’ERNE 7. 
QUESTIONNAIRE TO BENEFICIARIES OF RSFF LOANS AND REPRESENTATIVES OF JTIs 7.
Under revisionen fik alle 26 modtagere af RSFF-lån i EU-lånevinduet tilsendt et spørgeskema. 
During the audit, all 26 beneficiaries of RSFF loans in the EU window were sent a questionnaire.
Hensigten med spørgeskemaet var at få overblik over modtagernes bevæggrunde til at bruge RSFF-instrumentet og over resultaterne af de finansierede investeringer. 
The aim of the questionnaire was to obtain an overview of the beneficiaries’ motivations for using the RSFF instrument and the results generated by the financed investment.
Det giver en svarprocent på næsten 70 %. 
This represents a response rate of almost 70 %.
Retten bad FTI-repræsentanterne og repræsentanterne for industrisammenslutningerne om at udfylde et spørgeskema, hvis formål var at give et afbalanceret billede af aspekterne ved FTI’ernes organisatoriske struktur. Særberetning nr. 2/2013 – Har Kommissionen sørget for, at syvende rammeprogram for forskning gennemføres effektivt? 
The JTI representatives and the representatives of the industry associations were asked to fill in a questionnaire in order to obtain a balanced view of the aspects relating to the organisational structures of the JTIs. Special Report No 2/2013 – Has the Commission ensured efficient implementation of the seventh framework programme for research?
1/2004 Rettens vurdering af situationen i 2011/2012 De meget komplekse regler for deltagelse vanskeliggør effektiv kontraktforvaltning under 5. RP og komplicerer tingene for modtagerne (punkt III, 15, 17, 27, 28 og 29). Kommissionen bør [...] tage de grundlæggende principper for fastsættelsen af EU’s bidrag op til fornyet overvejelse og sørge for, at ordningerne under et kommende 7. 
ANNEX II FOLLOW-UP OF THE COURT'S PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS 58 Court’s key findings in SR 1/2004, which were followed up in the audit Court’s recommendations in SR 1/2004 Commission’s replies to recommendations in SR 1/2004 Court’s assessment of the situation in 2011/2012 The complexity of the rules for participation hinders the effective contract management of FP5 and is a complication for beneficiaries. (paragraphs III, 15, 17, 27 to 29). (...) The Commission should (...) review from first principles the rules for setting the Community’s participation, aiming for significant simplification whilst allowing adequate control over expenditure in a future FP7.
Retten har tidligere anbefalet, at der kun opereres med én ordning for omkostningsgodtgørelse med tre hovedkategorier af omkostninger. En sådan forenkling bør indgå som et væsentligt element i overvejelserne (punkt 115). [Kommissionen] vil fortsætte med at udvikle modellen for forvaltning af rammeprogrammerne, herunder når den fremsætter forslag til det kommende 7. rammeprogram, hvorved den vil lægge særlig stor vægt på forenkling af procedurerne. 
The Court’s previous recommendation of a single cost reimbursement system with three main categories of costs should be one of the main elements to be considered. (paragraph 115) [The Commission] will ensure that the framework programmes’ management model continues to develop, including when the proposal is put forward for the future FP7, focusing in particular on streamlining procedures.
Nogle forenklinger er blevet foreslået i RP7. 
Some simplifications have been proposed in FP7.
Forenkling af finansieringsmodellen er et vigtigt element i Kommissionens forslag om Horisont 2020 (jf. punkt 20). 
Simplification of the funding model is an important element of the Commission’s proposal on Horizon 2020 (see paragraph 20).
Opsplitningen af programmerne, så de forvaltes af fem GD’er, resulterer i en udvanding af beføjelser, dobbeltarbejde og øget behov for koordinering og samråd (punkt V, 46-57, 63 og 116). 
The fragmentation of programmes into five DGs resulted in dilution of responsibilities, duplication of functions and increased need for coordination and consultation (paragraphs V, 46 to 57, 63, 116).
Retten anbefaler, at rammeprogrammets struktur og den organisatoriske struktur i de ansvarlige tjenester i Kommissionen tilpasses hinanden. 
The Court recommends that the structure of the framework programme and the organisation of the Commission services which manage it be brought into line.
Forskningsprogrammerne er enkeltstående programmer, og denne grundlæggende struktur bør afspejles i Kommissionens organisatoriske struktur. 
The basic design of research programmes as single programmes should be reflected in the organisational structure of the Commission.
Horisontale aspekter, såsom støtte til små og mellemstore virksomheder eller internationalt samarbejde, bør så vidt muligt integreres i de tematiske programmer (punkt 119). Retten anbefaler, at Kommissionen undersøger, om det er muligt at samle, FTU-rammeprogrammerne hos én enkelt enhed (punkt 123). [...] 
Horizontal aspects, such as support for small and medium-sized enterprises or international cooperation, should be integrated as far as possible within the thematic programmes. (paragraph 119) The Court recommends that the Commission analyses the possibility of merging the RTD framework programmes in a single entity. (paragraph 123) (...)
Kommissionen deler Revisionsrettens opfattelse, at en god koordination [...] er en uomgængelig betingelse for en effektiv forvaltning. [...] 
The Commission shares the Court’s view that effective coordination (...) is crucial to efficient management. (...)
Kommissionen mener [ikke], at den centrale forvaltningsmodel er velegnet. [...] 
The Commission considers that a centralised management model is not appropriate.
I den handlingsplan, som Kommissionen vedtog i januar 2003 [...] foreslås bl.a., at der oprettes en tværtjenstlig gruppe til sikring af bedre koordinering og kohærens mellem Kommissionens tjenestegrene. 
The action plan adopted in January 2003 by the Commission (...) includes a proposal to set up a permanent interdepartmental group to ensure better coordination and cohesion between Commission departments.
Delvis implementeret Antallet af kommissionstjenester, der er involveret i forvaltningen af RP7, er tilmed steget. 
The number of Commission services involved in the management of FP7 implementation has even increased.
Denne situation har kompliceret gennemførelsen af RP7. 
This situation has complicated the implementation of FP7.