natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I forbindelse med revisionsbesżg i 1999 og 2000 undersżgte Retten p kommissionsniveau og i seks medlemsstater Ń Tyskland, Spanien, Frankrig, Irland, Portugal og Det Forenede Kongerige Ń hvor langt man var kommet med gennemfżrelsen af IFKS i 1998, som var det andet r efter udlżbet af overgangsperioden (1993 til 1996; 1997 for de tre nye medlemsstater). 
During audit visits carried out in 1999 and 2000, the Court examined the level of implementation of IACS in 1998, the second year after the end of the transitional period (1993 to 1996; 1997 for the three new Member States), at the level of the Commission and in six Member States, namely Germany, Spain, France, Ireland, Portugal and the United Kingdom.
Revisionen tog specielt sigte p arealstżtteordningen og oksekżdspržmieordningerne. 
The schemes that were specifically reviewed were the area aid scheme and bovine premiums.
I de tilfžlde, hvor der forel plidelige oplysninger om de seneste r, ajourfżrte Retten sine resultater p baggrund af disse oplysninger (jf. punkt 7-8). 
Where reliable information was available for later years the Court updated its findings on the basis of this information (see paragraphs 7 and 8).
Kommissionens vžsentligste opgaver er at udforme IFKS-konceptet (samfinansieret mellem 1992 og 1997) og at fżre tilsyn med, koordinere og kontrollere gennemfżrelsen af IFKS i alle medlemsstaterne. 
The CommissionŐs main roles are to design the concept of IACS (co-financed between 1992 and 1997); and to supervise, coordinate and check the implementation of IACS in all the Member States.
Disse opgaver varetages af direktoratet for regnskabsafslutning i Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug. 
This role is performed by the Clearance-of-Accounts Directorate in the Agriculture Directorate-General.
Andre af Kommissionens tjenester er ogs involverede i forvaltningen af IFKS (for eksempel markedsenhederne i Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug og Generaldirektoratet for Sundhed og Forbrugerbeskyttelse, som har ansvaret for den veterinžre kontrol), men nogle problemer kunne muligvis vžre undget, hvis koordineringen havde vžret mere effektiv (jf. punkt 41). 
There are, moreover, other Commission services that also deal with IACS (such as the market divisions of the Agriculture Directorate-General and the Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, which is in charge of veterinary aspects) but certain problems might have been avoided if coordination had been more effective (see paragraph 41).
V. IFKS-forordningerne og de forskellige markedsforordninger er ifżlge sagens natur komplicerede og ikke s pržcist formulerede, at der er taget hżjde for alle fortolkningsmuligheder. 
V. IACS and the different market regulations are by their nature complicated and they are not precise enough to explain in detail all eventualities relating to their interpretation.
Kommissionen har derfor udarbejdet en ržkke fortolkninger og anbefalinger. 
The Commission has therefore issued a number of interpretations and recommendations.
Alligevel er praksis i medlemsstaterne stadig forskellige. 
Despite this, practices in the Member States still differ.
De vigtigste forordninger blev žndret 80 gange mellem 1992 og 1999 (jf. punkt 37-38 og 43-53). 
The main regulations were amended 80 times between 1992 and 1999 (see paragraphs 37 and 38, and 43 to 53).
Mžngden og kvaliteten af medlemsstaternes oplysninger samt Kommissionens evaluering af disse oplysninger m forbedres. 
The extent and quality of information provided by the Member States needs to be improved.
Kommissionen bżr fortsžtte bestržbelserne p at f forbedret kvaliteten af de oplysninger, som den anmoder om og modtager fra medlemsstaterne. Den bżr ogs prioritere evalueringen af oplysningerne hżjere og gżre mere brug af dem og p den mde gżre tilsynet med medlemsstaternes gennemfżrelse af IFKS mere effektivt (jf. punkt 39 og 54-66). 
The Commission should continue its efforts to improve the quality of the information it requests and receives from the Member States and to evaluate and use that information to improve its management of the Member StatesŐ implementation of IACS (see paragraphs 39 and 54 to 66).
Medlemsstaterne har ansvaret for den egentlige gennemfżrelse af IFKS. 
The Member States are responsible for the actual implementation of IACS.
Selv om den endelige frist for fuld gennemfżrelse af IFKS var den 1. januar 1997, konstaterede Retten under revisionen vedvarende svagheder i de besżgte medlemsstater. 
Although the final deadline for the full implementation of IACS was 1 January 1997 the CourtŐs audit revealed persistent weaknesses in the Member States visited.
Hovedsagelig var der tale om, at der ikke blev foretaget krydskontrol af marker og dyr Ń eller kun delvis krydskontrol Ń at mark-og kvžgdatabaserne var ufuldstžndige og ikke ajourfżrt, samt at kvaliteten af kontrollen p stedet ikke var god nok (jf. punkt 68-71). 
This concerns mainly the non or partial execution of cross-checks of surface areas and animals, the fact that the databases on surface areas and bovine animals were in some cases incomplete and out of date and the poor quality of the field inspections (see paragraphs 68 to 71).
Rettens vžsentligste anbefalinger er, at der bżr udvikles et hensigtsmžssigt ledelsesinformationssystem, og at regelsžttet for IFKS bżr forenkles og harmoniseres (jf. punkt 81). 
The CourtŐs main recommendations to the Commission concern the development of an efficient management information system and the simplification and harmonisation of the regulatory framework (see paragraph 81).
C 214/3 
C 214/3
C 214/4 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 31.7.2001 INDLEDNING Generel baggrund 1. 
C 214/4 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 INTRODUCTION General context 1.
Med det forml at sikre bedre markedsligevžgt blev der i 1992 igangsat en vidtgende reform af den fžlles landbrugspolitik, isžr i sektoren for markafgrżder (korn, oliefrż, proteinafgrżder og oliehżr) og i sektoren for kżd (oksekżd, frekżd og gedekżd). 
In order to ensure better market equilibria, the common agricultural policy (CAP) was significantly reformed in 1992, in particular in the arable crops sector (cereals, oilseeds, protein seeds and non-textile flax) and the meat sector (beef and veal, sheep and goat).
De institutionelle priser blev sat ned, og der blev indfżrt en ordning med direkte kompensation til landbrugerne. 
Institutional prices were reduced and direct compensatory payments to farmers were introduced.
Kompensationsbelż-bene er baseret p landbrugernes anmeldelser af stżtteberettigede arealer (markafgrżder) og antallet af stżtteberettigede dyr (hus-dyrpržmier) (1). 
These payments are based on the eligible area (for arable crops) and the eligible animals (for animal premiums) (1) declared by the farmers.
Fżr reformen vedrżrte udgifterne hovedsagelig intervention i form af oplagring og eksportrestitutioner. 
Before the reform, the expenditure was concentrated on intervention storage and export refunds.
Overgangen til en ordning med direkte stżtte til landbrugerne (2) betżd, at den fžlles landbrugspolitik kom til at leve bedre op til Fžllesskabets GATT/ WTO-forpligtelser, men antallet af stżttemodtagere steg betydeligt, og forvaltningen af stżtten blev meget mere kompliceret. 
While the changeover to a system of direct aid for farmers (2) made the CAP more compatible with GATT/WTO commitments, the number of recipients considerably increased and the administration of the aid became significantly more complicated.
Der var brug for et effektivt og omfattende kontrolsystem, og derfor besluttede Rdet i 1992 at oprette det integrerede forvaltnings-og kontrolsystem (IFKS) (3). 
An effective and comprehensive control system was therefore needed and so the Council decided in 1992 to create the integrated administration and control system (IACS) (3).
Hvert r behandles og kontrolleres cirka seks millioner stżtteansżgninger inden for rammerne af IFKS (ca. 3,2 millioner ansżgninger om arealstżtte og 2,8 millioner ansżgninger om hus-dyrstżtte) (4). 
Some six million aid applications are processed and checked each year by IACS (some 3,2 million area aid applications and 2,8 million aid applications for animals) (4).
Der foretages administrativ kontrol af alle stżtteansżgninger med det forml at finde frem til forkerte anmeldelser og f dem korrigeret. 
In order to detect and correct inaccurate claims, automatic administrative checks are performed on all aid applications.
Uden et system som IFKS ville det vžre umuligt at foretage tilstržkkelig kontrol, der kan sikre, at der bliver behandlet fžrrest muligt ansżgninger med fejl. 
Without a system such as IACS it would be impossible to carry out adequate checks to minimise the processing of incorrect applications.
Gennemfżrelsen af IFKS 4. 
Implementation of IACS 4.
Medlemsstaterne skulle oprette systemer, der var omfattende nok til at gennemfżre IFKS, og isžr skulle der etableres store com-putersystemer, som kunne styre databaser med flere hundrede millioner oplysninger. 
Member States were obliged to establish adequate systems to implement IACS, and in particular powerful computer systems which would allow the management of databases containing hundreds of millions of items of data.
Indfżrelsen af IFKS begyndte i 1993, og de fżrste betalinger i henhold til den nye fžlles landbrugspolitik blev foretaget i regnskabsret 1994. 
The introduction of IACS commenced in 1993, and the related payments for the new CAP started in the 1994 budget year.
Der var sat forskellige frister for gennemfżrelsen af de forskellige stadier i IFKS. 
There were different deadlines for the achievement of the various stages in IACS.
Fristen for den endelige gennemfżrelse var 1. januar 1997 (5) (undtagen for de tre nye medlemsstater Ń Żstrig, Sverige og Finland Ń som havde et r mere). 
The deadline for final implementation was 1 January 1997 (5) (except for the three new Member States Ń Austria, Finland and Sweden Ń which had an extra year).
IFKS er det vigtigste redskab til kontrol af EUGFL, Garantisektionens udgifter, og det vil f stadig stżrre betydning, efterhnden som stadig flere foranstaltninger og stadig flere udgifter forvaltes direkte eller indirekte og kontrolleres via dette system (ordninger for bžlgplanter, ris, tżrret foder, spindhżr og hamp, bomuld, humle og landbrugsmiljżforanstaltninger): 42,6 % af EUGFL, Garantisektionens udgifter i 1994 og 63,6 % i 1999 (jf. tabel 1 og figur 1). 
IACS is the key tool for the control of EAGGF-Guarantee expenditure and its importance is increasing with time as progressively more measures and expenditure are directly or indirectly managed and controlled through this system (grain-legume, rice, dried fodder, fibre flax and hemp, cotton, hops and agri-environmental schemes): 42,6 % of EAGGF-Guarantee expenditure in 1994 and 63,6 % in 1999 (see Table 1 and Illustration 1).
I regnskabsret 2004 vil mere end 80 % af EUGFL, Garantisektionens udgifter blive bearbejdet i IFKS som fżlge af Agenda2000-reformenogRdetsbeslutningom,atIFKSfra 2003 ogs skal omfatte andre ordninger, for eksempel for tobak, olivenolie, tżrrede druer, citrusfrugter, tomater til forarbejdning og vin (6). 
In the financial year 2004 more than 80 % of EAGGF-Guarantee expenditure will be processed through IACS as the result of the Agenda 2000 reform and the decision by the Council to include other schemes, such as tobacco, olive oil, dried grapes, citrus fruits and tomatoes for processing and wine from the year 2003 (6).
(1) Der er detaljerede regler for, hvornr arealer og dyr er stżtteberettigede. 
(1) There are detailed rules for determining both eligible area and eligible animals.
Berettigelse til arealstżtte er betinget af, at jorden blev anvendt til markafgrżder i 1991. 
To be eligible for area aid, the land must have been used for arable crops in 1991.
Der gžlder forskellige kvoter for husdyrstżt-ten, og det er en forudsžtning for betaling af stżtten, at der findes 2 stżtteberettigede foderarealer p bedriften. () I oksekżdssektoren blev der ogs ydet direkte stżtte fżr 1992. 
There are various quotas applicable for the ani-2 malaid,andpaymentisalsorestrictedbyeligibleforageareas. () Concerning the beef and veal sector, direct aid existed before 1992.
Med reformen blev denne stżtte mere end tredoblet mellem 1992 og 1996 3 for EU-12. () Rdets forordning (EŻF) nr. 3508/92 af 27. november 1992 (EFT L 355 af 5.12.1992, s. 
With the reform this aid was more than tripled between 1992 and 3 1996 for EU-12. () Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 of 27 November 1992 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p.
3887/92 af 23. decem-4 ber 1992 (EFT L 391 af 31.12.1992, s. 
The detailed implementation rules were established by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 (OJ L 391, 4 31.12.1992, p.
36). () Kilde: Arealstżtte Ń Kommissionens GD VI, data for 1998; Husdyr-pržmier Ń Kommissionens GD VI, data for 1998 er ufuldstžndige og omfatter et skżn baseret p tallene for 1994 (Kommissionens tjeneste har ingen ajourfżrte oplysninger). 
36). () Source: Area aid Ń Commission DG VI data for 1998; Animal premiums Ń incomplete Commission DG VI data for 1998, with an estimate based on 1994 (there is no updated information available at the Commission service).
5 () Oprindelig var fristen 1. januar 1996. 
5 () In the beginning, the deadline was 1 January 1996.
Den nye frist blev sat ved Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 2466/96 af 17. december 1996 (EFT L 335 af 6 24.12.1996, s. 
The new deadline was set by Council Regulation (EC) No 2466/96 of 17 December 6 1996 (OJ L 335, 24.12.1996, p.
1). () Det er fastsat i Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 1593/2000 af 17. juli 2000 (EFT L 182 af 21.7.2000, s. 
1). () Council Regulation (EC) No 1593/2000 of 17 July 2000 (OJ L 182, 21.7.2000, p.
3508/92, at systemer til bearbejdning af arealbaseret stżtte (f.eks. til hżr og hamp, miljżforanstaltninger og skovbrug) og systemer til bearbejdning af produktionsstżtte (f.eks. til tobak, olivenolie, bomuld, vin, tomater og citrusfrugter) skal vžre forenelige med IFKS. 
4) amending Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92, stipulates that systems for aids based on areas (such as flax and hemp, environment, forestry) and for production aids (such as tobacco, olive oil, cotton, wine, tomatoes and citrus fruits) shall be compatible with IACS.
Det forklarer faldet i IFKS-udgifter i 2000. 
This explains the decrease in IACS expenditure for year 2000.
(2) I henhold til artikel 1, stk. 1, i forordning (EŻF) nr. 
(2) According to Article 1(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92.
3508/92. (3) Foranstaltninger, som ikke skal angives i arealstżtteansżgningerne, men anmeldes sžrskilt i henhold til artikel 4, stk. 
(3) Measures to be declared separately from the area aid applications according to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92.
3887/92. (4) I 2001 indgr stżtten for spindhżr og hamp i hektarstżtten for markafgrżder. 
(4) In 2001, the aid for flax and hemp is part of per hectare aid for arable crops.
Kilder: 1994-1999: Finansberetninger om EUGFL, Garantisektionen. 
Source: 1994-1999: Financial Report concerning EAGGF, Guarantee Section.
2000: Kommissionens dokument AGRI/72bis/2000 af 18.1.2001. 
2000: Commission Document AGRI/72a/2000 of 18.1.2001.
2001: Det almindelige budget for 2001. 
2001: General Budget 2001.
C 214/6 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 31.7.2001 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Figur 1 Udviklingen i EUGFL-udgifterne, som er omfattet af IFKS, i % 66,3 % 60,6 % 63,6 % 62,9 % 51,7 % 57,7 % 57,2 % 42,6 % 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 NB: Faldet i 2000 skyldes, at stżtten for oliefrż betaltes senere, og ikke, at IFKS omfattede fžrre udgifter. 
C 214/6 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Illustration 1 Evolution of the percentage of EAGGF expenditure covered by IACS 66,3 % 60,6 % 63,6 % 62,9 % 51,7 % 57,7 % 57,2 % 42,6 % 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 NB: The decrease in 2000 is due to a change in the timing of the payment of aid for oilseeds, rather than a decrease in the coverage of IACS.
Kilde: Udviklingen i EUGFL-udgifterne, Generaldirektoratet for Landbrug (jf. tabel 1). 
Source: Evolution of EAGGF expenditure, Commission DG AGRI (see table 1).
I forbindelse med en analyse af arealstżtteordningen og oksekżdspržmieordningerne undersżgte Retten i 1995 og 1996, hvor langt man var kommet med gennemfżrelsen af dele af IFKS. 
The CourtŐs audit 7. In 1995 and 1996 the Court examined the level of implementation of some parts of IACS while analysing the area aid scheme and the beef and veal premium scheme.
Resultaterne af revisionen blev offentliggjort i rsberetningen for 1996 (1). 
The results of the audit were published in the 1996 (1) annual report.
Retten undersżgte, hvor langt man var kommet med gennemfżrelsen af IFKS i 1998 (hovedsagelig EUGFL, Garantisektionens 1999-udgifter vedrżrende stżtteansżgninger indgivet i 1998), som var det andet r, hvor systemet skulle vžre fuldt gennemfżrt. 
For the current audit the Court examined, through audit visits to the Commission and Member States in 1999 and 2000, the level of implementation of IACS in 1998 (mainly 1999 EAGGF-Guarantee expenditure for aid applications made in 1998), the second year when it was required to be fully implemented.
De vžsentligste revisionsml var at f sikkerhed for, at IFKS var operationelt og fuldt gennemfżrt, at dataene i databaserne var fuldstžndige og gyldige og ajourfżrt, samt at vurdere Kommissionens rolle i gennemfżrelsen af IFKS (indtil midten af 2000). 
The principal audit objectives were to confirm that IACS was being fully implemented and was operational, that the data collected in the databases were complete and valid and were being updated on time, and to assess the CommissionŐs role (until mid-2000) in the implementation of IACS.
Revisionen blev foretaget p grundlag af Kommissionens dokumenter, herunder resultaterne af Kommissionens kontrolbesżg i medlemsstaterne. 
The audit was based on the CommissionŐs documents, including the findings of the CommissionŐs inspections at the level of the Member States.
Desuden besżgte Retten i seks medlemsstater, nemlig Tyskland (2), Spanien (3), Frankrig (4), Irland, Portugal og Det Forenede Kongerige (5), en ržkke centrale og regionale/ lokale myndigheder, som er ansvarlige for IFKS-ordninger. 
In addition central and regional/local authorities dealing with the management of IACS schemes in six Member States, namely Germany (2), Spain (3), France (4), Ireland, Portugal, and the United Kingdom (5), were visited.
Disse medlemsstater tegner sig for 76 % af EUGFL, Garantisektionens IFKS-udgifter vedrżrende markafgrżder og kvžg (jf. figur 2). 
These Member States account for 76 % of IACS expenditure by the EAGGF-Guarantee for arable crops and bovine animals (see Illustration 2).
1 ( ) rsberetning for regnskabsret 1996, kapitel 3 og 4 (EFT C 348 af 18.11.1997). 
1 ( ) Annual Report 1996 concerning the financial year, Chapters 3 and 4 (OJ C 348, 18.11.1997).
(2) 3 () 4 ( ) 5 () Retten aflagde revisionsbesżg i Forbundslandbrugsministeriet og i delstaterne Niedersachsen og Bayern. 
(2) 3 () 4 ( ) 5 () Visits were carried out at the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and in the Lnder of Lower Saxony and Bavaria.
Retten aflagde revisionsbesżg p centralt niveau og i de selvstyrende regioner Catalonien og Navarra. 
Visits were carried out at central level and in the Autonomous Communities of Catalonia and Navarre.
Retten aflagde revisionsbesżg p centralt niveau og p regionalt niveau i departementerne Bouches-du-Rhne, Haute-Corse og Lan-des. 
Visits were carried out at central level and at regional level in the Departments of Bouches-du-Rhne, Haute Corse and Landes.
I Det Forenede Kongerige aflagde Retten revisionsbesżg p centralt niveau og i Skotland og Wales. 
In the United Kingdom, visits were carried out at central level and in Scotland and Wales.
31.7.2001 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende C 214/7 35 % 30 % 25 % 20 % 15 % 10 % 5% 0% Kilde: Basisdata fra Kommissionen Ń Generaldirektoratet for Landbrugs udgiftsrapporter. 
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/7 35 % 30 % 25 % 20 % 15 % 10 % 5% 0% Source: Basic data obtained from Commission DG AGRI expenditure reports.
DET INTEGREREDE SYSTEMS STRUKTUR Indledning 9. 
DESIGN OF THE INTEGRATED SYSTEM Introduction 9.
Det er fastsat i Rdets forordning om IFKS, at medlemsstaterne skal oprette fżlgende fem systemelementer (1): a) En database, hvori der for hver landbrugsbedrift indlžses oplysningerfrastżtteansżgningerne. b) Et system til identifikation af marker. Ved hjžlp af dette system kan anmeldte arealer lokaliseres, s de kan overvges over lžngere tid, og der kan foretages edb-krydskontrol og kontrol p stedet. c) Et system til identifikation og registrering of dyr, s anmeldelser kan krydskontrolleres og kontrolleres p stedet. d) Stżtteansżgninger med oplysninger om arealer, foderarealer og dyr. e) Et integreret kontrolsystem for administrativ kontrol og kontrol p stedet. 
The Council Regulation introducing IACS requires Member Statestoestablishthefollowingfiveelements(1): (a) acomputeriseddatabasetorecordthedataintheaidapplica-tions for each agricultural holding; (b) an identification system for agricultural parcels, i.e. a system to allow areas declared to be located so they can be monitored over time and so that computerised cross-checks and on-the-spot checks can be organised; (c) a system of identification and registration of animals, which enables claims to be cross-checked and controlled on the spot; (d) aid applications for area aid, forage areas and animals; (e) an integrated control system for administrative controls and field inspections.
Diagrammet i tabel 2 giver en oversigt over den teoretiske behandling af stżtteansżgninger i IFKS med angivelse af de vigtigste kontroller. 
Table 2 provides an overview of the theoretical processing of aid applications through IACS, with its principal controls.
Figur 3 viser antallet af modtagne ansżgninger om stżtte for markafgrżder i 1998 og det berżrte areal. 
Illustration 3 shows the number of applications received for arable crops and the area concerned in 1998.
De tilsvarende oplysninger om stżtteansżgninger vedrżrende kvžg findesi figur 4. 
The corresponding information for bovine aid applications is in Illustration 4.
Figur 2 Medlemsstaternes andel af de IFKS-relaterede udgifter i 1999 Hektarstżtte Đ markafgrżder Kvžgpržmier I alt (1) Rdets forordning (EŻF) nr. 3508/92, artikel 2. 
Illustration 2 Member StatesŐ share of IACS related expenditure in 1999 Per hectare aid for arable crops Premiums for bovine animals Total (1) Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92, Article 2.
0,9 % 2,8 % 1,3 % 4,0 % 1,2 % 3,0 % 1,3 % 0,7 % 3,2 % 14,0 % 0,1 % 0,2 % 0,1 % 0,8 % 0,6 % 0,8 % 2,2 % 2,4 % 2,3 % 1,0 % 2,2 % 1,2 % 1,4 % 1,0 % 1,4 % 2,4 % 1,9 % 2,3 % 3,5 % 9,2 % 20,9 % 18,7 % 2,6 % 4,4 % 11,1 % 9,9 % Procentdel af udgifterne i 1999 10,3 % 11,2 % 10,4 % 10,0 % 11,8 % 19,9 % 31,2 % 27,8 % 30,5 % Belgien Danmark Tyskland Gržkenland Spanien Frankrig Irland Italien Luxembourg Nederlandene Żstrig Portugal Finland Sverige Det Forenede Kongerige 
0,9 % 2,8 % 1,3 % 4,0 % 1,2 % 3,0 % 1,3 % 0,7 % 3,2 % 14,0 % 0,1 % 0,2 % 0,1 % 0,8 % 0,6 % 0,8 % 2,2 % 2,4 % 2,3 % 1,0 % 2,2 % 1,2 % 1,4 % 1,0 % 1,4 % 2,4 % 1,9 % 2,3 % 3,5 % 9,2 % 20,9 % 18,7 % 2,6 % 4,4 % 11,1 % 9,9 % Percentage share of expenditure in 1999 10,3 % 11,2 % 10,4 % 10,0 % 11,8 % 19,9 % 31,2 % 27,8 % 30,5 % Belgium Denmark Germany Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Austria Portugal Finland Sweden United Kingdom
C 214/8 DA De Europžiske Fžllesskabers Tidende 31.7.2001 Tabel 2 Oversigt over de vigtigste IFKS-kontroller Ansżgning om arealstżtte med angivelse af foderareal Ansżgning om husdyrpržmier Registrering af ansżgningen Ved modtagelsen evt. kontrol af formaliteter: er anmeldelsen udfyldt korrekt, underskrevet mv. 
C 214/8 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 Table 2 Overview of principal IACS controls Area aid and forage area applications Animal premium applications Registration of receipt Optional formality checks on receipt: is the claim complete, signed, etc.