natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der er kun sket begržnsede fremskridt med hensyn til kapacitetsopbygning 68. 
Limited progress in institutional capacity building 68.
Som allerede nžvnt (jf. punkt 34) er institutionel kapacitet et afgżrende element i alle former for udviklingssamarbejde. Miljżministerier og andre miljżinstitutioner er ofte relativt nye og har derfor sžrlig behov for sdan bistand. 
While institutional capacity building is a vital element in all development cooperation, as already noted (see paragraph 34), Ministries of the Environment and other environmental institutions are often relatively new and therefore especially in need of such assistance.
Det er i endnu hżjere grad tilfžldet i lande, hvor en nylig decentralisering 
This is all the more the case in countries where
C 235/18 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 29.9.2006 Der bżr i hżjere grad sžttes fokus p bžredygtig anvendelse af naturressourcerne i lokalsamfundene 71. 
C 235/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.9.2006 The need for greater focus on the sustainable use of natural resources by local communities 71.
En central betingelse for, at mlene for miljżprojekter kan opfyldes fuldt ud, og projekterne kan blive bžredygtige, er, at lokalsamfundene deltager i udarbejdelsen og gennemfżrelsen af dem. 
A key requirement for ensuring that environment projects achieve their full objectives and become sustainable is that local communities participate in their preparation and implementation.
Kommissionen lžgger mere og mere vžgt p dette aspekt, til dels som fżlge af den udviklingspolitik, der blev fastlagt i 2000, og som fokuserede p fattigdomsbekžmpelse. 
The Commission has steadily increased the attention it gives to this aspect, partly as a result of the Development Policy established in 2000 which focused on poverty reduction.
Det er dog under alle omstžndigheder en meget stor udfordring at f lokalsamfundenes żkonomiske behov til at stemme overens med kravet om naturbevaring. 
Nevertheless, the reconciling of the economic needs of local communities with the need for nature conservation represents a major challenge.
Der er ikke blevet lagt nok vžgt i projekterne p at hjžlpe lokalsamfundene med at f en indkomst fra naturressourcerne p en bžredygtig mde. 
Insufficient attention has been given in projects to helping local communities generate income in a sustainable way from natural resources.
Lokalsamfundenes ulovlige jagt (krybskytteri) er fortsat en alvorlig trussel mod bevaringsprojekternes resultater og deres miljżmžssige bžredygtighed. 
Thus, for example, illegal hunting (ÔpoachingŐ) by local communities remains a serious threat to the results achieved by conservation projects and their environmental sustainability.
Det gžlder ogs i omrder, hvor Kommissionen har ydet stżtte over en lang periode, som f.eks. Serengeti-nationalparken i Tanzania og i de beskyttede omrder i den centralafrikanske region, som finansieres af Ecofac. 
This is true even in areas where the Commission has provided support over long periods of time, such as the Serengeti National Park in Tanzania and protected areas in the Central African region funded by ECOFAC.
Udvikling af turisme er et middel til forbedring af indkomsten bde lokalt og nationalt. 
The development of tourism is a means of improving local as well as national income.
Projektet til beskyttelse af vilde dyr og planter i Botswana, som finansieres over ottende EUF, har imidlertid kun gjort lidt for at udvikle turismen i Makgadikgadi-nationalparken, selv om en tidligere undersżgelse vedrżrende turisme i Botswana under sjette EUF havde anbefalet en sdan tilgang. 
However, in Botswana, the eighth EDF Wildlife project did little to help develop tourism in the Makgadikgadi National Park even though an earlier, sixth EDF tourism study on Botswana had recommended such an approach.
P trods af sine resultater, for s vidt angr bevaring, har Ecofac sledes kun gjort f fremskridt med hensyn til at behandle turistspżrgsml (jf. tekstboks 10). 
The ECOFAC programme, despite its conservation achievements, has made little headway in addressing tourism issues (see Box 10).
Det viser tydeligt, at Kommissionen fortsat bżr arbejde p at hjžlpe lokalsamfundene med at finde alternative indkomstkilder. 
This emphasises the need for the Commission to continue to seek ways to help establish alternative sources of income for such communities.
Projekterne indvirker ikke i tilstržkkelig grad p de politiske og de retlige rammer 73. 
Insufficient impact of projects on policy and legal framework 73.
Uden klare politiske og retlige rammer, som projektet kan stżtte sig til, er mulighederne for, at det i tilgift til de umiddelbare output og resultater ogs kan blive bžredygtigt p lang sigt og f en langtržkkende effekt, stžrkt begržnsede. 
Without a clear and supportive policy and legal framework, the prospects for a projectŐs moving beyond immediate outputs and results to achieve long-term sustainability and have a wider impact are greatly reduced.
For eksempel har ufuldstžndige retlige rammer, sžrlig i relation til projektmodtagernes ejendomsret til jorden i lokalsamfundene, hindret gennemfżrelsen af skovprojekter i Indonesien og Kina. 
Incomplete legal frameworks, particularly in relation to the land rights of project beneficiaries in local communities have, for example, hindered forestry projects in Indonesia and China.
I Botswana og Tanzania er manglende definitive love for indfżrelse af lokalsamfundsbaseret forvaltning af naturressourcer og forvaltning af omrder med vilde dyr og planter ogs en hindring for, at projekterne kan f fuld virkning. 
In Botswana and Tanzania, the lack of definitive laws to establish community-based natural resource management and wildlife management areas is also an obstacle to projects achieving their full impact.
I flere lande har manglende ressourcer eller mangel p vilje til at hndhžve anti-krybskyttelove til beskyttelse af vilde dyr og planter undermineret projekternes muligheder for at blive bžredygtige, nr de er afsluttet. 
In several countries the lack of resources or will to enforce anti-poaching laws to protect wildlife has undermined the sustainability of projects after their completion.
En mde, hvorp Kommissionen ved hjžlp af projekterne kan vžre med til at žndre de politiske og retlige rammer, er at knytte betingelser til finansieringen af dem. 
One way to use projects to bring changes to the policy and legal framework is for the Commission to attach conditions to their funding.
Denne tilgang kan imidlertid ikke anvendes, nr der er tale om projekter, som gennemfżres af ngoŐer, og som finansieres over budgetposten for miljż og skove, eftersom regeringerne i modtagerlandene ikke er stżtteberettigede. 
However, this approach is not feasible in the case of projects implemented by NGOs funded through the Environment and Forestry budget line since beneficiary country governments are not eligible.
I nogle tilfžlde forsżgte bilaterale projekter, som Kommissionen finansierede, at f modtagerregeringerne til at tržffe ČledsageforanstaltningerÇ med henblik p at indfżre passende regler. 
In some cases, bilateral projects funded by the Commission sought to require beneficiary governments to take Ôaccompanying measuresŐ to establish appropriate policies.
Kommissionen havde imidlertid ikke altid defineret disse foranstaltninger klart, og den fulgte dem heller ikke altid op. 
However, such measures were not always well defined and followed up by the Commission.
Hertil kommer, at de begržnsede belżb, der er tale om selv i forbindelse med disse relativt omfattende bilaterale projekter, gżr det endnu vanskeligere at insistere p, at der rent faktisk tržffes ledsageforanstaltninger. 
Moreover, the limited financial amounts involved in even these relatively large bilateral projects make it more difficult to insist on the accompanying measures actually being taken.
I Tanzania sżgte Kommissionen f.eks. at sikre sig, at regeringen afsatte en stżrre del af indtžgterne fra jagtkoncessioner til džkning af vildtreservaternes driftsudgifter. 
For example, in Tanzania, the Commission sought to ensure that the government allocated more of the revenue earned from hunting concessions to covering the operating costs of the game reserves.
I forbindelse med det pgžldende projekt blev et s grundlžggende spżrgsml som den uigennemsigtige mde, som kon-cessionerne blev givet p, imidlertid ikke taget op, og da der kun var tale om 2 millioner euro, blev det endnu vanskeligere for Kommissionen at gżre det. 
However, the Commission did not address the fundamental issue of the untransparent way hunting concessions were awarded, and this was made more difficult by the fact that the project concerned was only for 2 million euro.
I den henseende ville man bedre kunne bidrage til at f etableret de rammer, der er nżdvendige for, at interventionerne p projektniveau bliver bžredygtige og fr effekt, hvis man lod miljżspżrgsml og reformpakker indg som betingelse for at yde omfattende direkte budgetstżtte. 
In this respect, the inclusion of environmental policy and legal reform packages in large direct budgetary support would be a better way to help establish the necessary frameworks in which project level interventions could be sustainable and have an impact.
Udbredelse af projektresultater og indhżstede erfaringer kan ogs spille en central rolle med hensyn til at pvirke den fżrte politik. 
The dissemination of project results and lessons learned can also play a key part in influencing policy.
En klar tilgang til udbredelse af resultater indgr imidlertid normalt ikke i projekternes design. 
However, in general, project design does not set out clear approaches for dissemination.
Hertil kommer, at de alt for ambitiżse tidsrammer og deraf fżlgende forsinkelser har mindsket den tekniske bistands og ngoŐernes muligheder for at udbrede resultater inden projektets afslutning. 
Moreover, the overambitious timeframes and subsequent delays have reduced the scope for technical assistance and NGOs to disseminate results before the end of the project.
Et af de vigtigste forml med denne budgetpost er at stżtte Tekstboks 14 Et projekt, som illustrerer, hvor vigtigt det er at tage sig af lokalsamfundenes behov i forbindelse med miljżprojekter Pilotprojektet til udvikling af en model for forvaltning af vildtbestanden i skovene i Centralafrika i det nordżstlige Gabon (1,9 millioner euro) var udformet med henblik p at lżse problemet med kommercielt krybskytteri i Congoflodens bžkken. 
While one of the main objectives of the budget line is to Box 14 A project illustrating the importance of assessing the needs of local communities in environment projects The pilot project Ôdevelopment of a model for managing fauna in the forests of Central Africa in north east GabonŐ (1,9 million euro) was designed to address the problem of commercial poaching in the forests of the Congo basin.
I overensstemmelse hermed omfattede projektet flere foranstaltninger, som skulle hndhžves ved hjžlp af anti-krybskytteenheder. 
The project accordingly included several measures to be enforced by anti-poaching units.
Under udformningen af projektet var man imidlertid ikke opmžrksom p, at de fleste af lokalsamfundene ogs var involveret i jagt, og derfor undersżgte man ikke, hvordan man kunne hjžlpe dem. 
However, the project designers failed to recognise that most of the local communities were also involved in hunting. Because of this, the project had not identified ways to assist them.
Over for revisionsholdet indrżm-mede repržsentanter for de lokale fiskersamfund under et besżg p projektet, at de havde fem jagtbaser inde i skoven, som var blevet żdelagt af anti-krybskytteenhederne, og forklarede, at de stod over for et dilemma, nemlig at der var en reel nedgang i vildtbestanden, men at de ogs var nżdt til at opfylde deres behov p kort sigt. 
During a visit by the audit team, representatives of one of the local fishing communities admitted that it had five hunting bases inside the forest which were destroyed by the anti-poaching units and explained that it was faced with the dilemma of a real decline in the amount of game and the necessity to meet its short-term needs.
29.9.2006 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 235/19 pilotprojekter, som skal bidrage til udvikling af nye politiktiltag, men Kommissionen har i vid udstržkning brugt ngoŐer til at gennemfżre disse politikker og har ikke etableret nogen mekanismer til sikring af, at regeringerne i modtagerlandene systematisk informeres om resultaterne af disse projekter. 
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/19 support pilot projects in order to contribute to the development of new policy approaches, the Commission has largely used NGOs to implement these policies and the Commission has not established any mechanisms for ensuring that governments in beneficiary countries are systematically informed of the results of these projects.
De relativt sm projekter, som finansieres over budgetposten for miljż og skove, og som ofte er pilotprojekter, har mulighed for at f tilfżrt yderligere midler i form af stżrre projekter, der finansieres over budgetposten for EUF og for det pgžldende geografiske omrde. 
In the case of projects funded from the Environment and Forestry Budget Line, one option is for these relatively small, often pilot, projects to receive further funding in the form of larger projects financed from the EDF and geographical budget line.
Det er imidlertid sjžldent sket i praksis. 
However, this has rarely happened in practice.
Det skyldes til dels, at Kommissionen ikke havde en klar strategi for at fremme opfżlgningen af disse mindre pilotprojekter ved hjžlp af stżrre bilaterale projekter. 
This is partly a result of the Commission not having had a clear strategy to promote the follow-up of these smaller pilot projects by larger bilateral projects.
Bde i Kommissionen og i modtagerlandene har der sledes vžret tendens til at betragte de midler, der var til rdighed p budgetposten for miljż og skove, som en grund til ikke at tildele bilaterale midler til miljżsektoren. 
Indeed, in both the Commission and in beneficiary countries there has been a tendency to consider funding available under the Environment and Forestry budget line as a reason for not allocating bilateral funds to the environment sector.
Uden stżtte fra regeringen er mulighederne for bžredygtighed i de fleste lande under alle omstžndigheder yderst begržnsede, og i mange udviklingslande er statsbudgetterne ikke store nok til, at de kan finansiere bevaringsforanstaltninger. 
In any case the prospects for financial viability without government support are very limited in most countries, and in many developing countries government budgets are insufficient to finance conservation measures.
Kommissionen og andre donorer har mulighed for at tilskynde modtagerregeringerne til at yde flere midler til miljżbeskyttelse ved i hżjere grad at stżtte forskning og indg i en dialog med modtagerlandene om de żkonomiske fordele ved bevaring af miljżet og om det nżdvendige i at undg, at naturressourcerne anvendes p en mde, som ikke er bžredygtig. 
In order to encourage more financing of environmental protection by beneficiary governments, scope exists for the Commission and other donors to support more research and engage in more dialogue with beneficiary countries on the economic benefits of environmental conservation and the need to avoid the unsustainable depletion of natural resource assets.
For mange af modtagerlandene gžlder det imidlertid, at de i hvert fald p kort sigt kan f stżrre żkonomiske fordele ved at udnytte de naturressoucer, der er til rdighed i de beskyttede omrder. 
Nevertheless, for many beneficiary governments, greater economic benefits, at least in the short term, can be derived from exploiting the natural resources available in conservation areas.
Under revisionen konstaterede revisorerne adskillige eksempler herp, som truede med at underminere de resultater, som projekterne havde net (jf. tekstboks 16). 
Several cases of this were found during the audit which threatened to undermine the results the projects had achieved (see Box 16).
Samtidig bżr det klart erkendes, at en fortsat beskyttelse af miljżet i udviklingslandene er til fordel for Den Europžiske Union. 
At the same time, the benefits derived by the European Union from the continued protection of the environment in developing countries should be clearly recognised.
P den baggrund bżr man stille spżrgsmlstegn ved, om Kommissionens traditionelle tilgang til udviklingsprojekter, som gr ud p kun at finansiere et projekt i nogle f r, hvorefter det skal vžre finansielt levedygtigt, er hensigtsmžsig, nr der er tale om projekter i miljżsektoren. 
In these circumstances, the question should be raised whether the CommissionŐs traditional development project approach of funding a project for only a few years, after which it is required to become financially viable, is appropriate to the environment sector.
Hvis Kommissionen havde opstillet en samlet strategi for behandling af miljżspżrgsml i forbindelse med udviklingsbistand (jf. punkt 11), ville man i hżjere grad kunne overveje alternative tilgange til levering af bistand som f.eks.: a) lžngere tidsrammer for miljżprojekter b) sektorstżtteprogrammer til beskyttelse af miljżet og de naturlige ressourcer c) stżrre anvendelse af trust funds d) tžttere samarbejde med den globale miljżfacilitet (GEF), som er det stżrste enkeltinstrument, som donorerne kan anvende til behandling af miljżanliggender i udviklingslandene. 
Had the Commission established a comprehensive strategy for dealing with the environment in the context of development aid (see paragraph 11), greater consideration could have been given to alternative approaches to aid delivery such as: (a) longer timeframes for environment projects; (b) sectoral policy support programmes in the environment and natural resources sector; (c) more use of trust funds; (d) closer cooperation with the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the largest single instrument available to donors to address environmental concerns in developing countries.
Selv om Kommissionen ikke for żjeblikket er medlem af GEF og dermed ikke kan bidrage direkte til den, er der i den sammenhžng store muligheder for mere medfinansiering. 
While the Commission is not currently a member of the GEF, and so can directly contribute to it, considerable scope exists for more co-financing with it.
Tekstboks 15 Et eksempel p, at problemer med politiske og retlige rammer har mindsket et projekts effekt og bžredygtighed Gennem programmet Natural Resources Policy (NRPP) i Brasilien finansierer Kommissionen arbejdet p at definere og implementere en model for integreret miljżforvaltning og forvaltningens decentralisering fra centralregeringen til stater og kommuner i fem stater i Amazonas (16,7 millioner euro). 
Box 15 An example of project impact and sustainability reduced by problems with policy and legal framework In Brazil, the Commission, through the Natural Resources Policy Programme (NRPP), finances the definition and implementation of an integrated environmental management model and its decentralisation from central Government to the state and municipal levels in five States of the Amazon (16,7 million euro).
NRPP var det stżrste af de projekter, som blev finansieret under Rain Forest Pilot Programme (PPG7), hvis overordnede ml er at f kontrol med afskovningen i Amazonas og vende udviklingen. 
The NRPP was the main project funded under the Rain Forest Pilot Programme (PPG7), aimed at reaching the overarching objective of controlling and reversing deforestation in the Amazon.
Med hensyn til at f kontrol med afskovningen har miljżforvaltnings-modellen vžret mindre effektiv end forventet. 
The environmental management model has been less effective than anticipated for controlling deforestation.
Den afgżrende rsag hertil var manglen p politisk engagement i de enkelte stater. 
Among the reasons behind this, the lack of political commitment at State political level was deter-minant.
De uholdbare finanser i de fleste stater og kommuner og i nogle stater og kommuner elitens traditionsbetingede żkonomiske interesser bevirker, at lokalregeringerne til skade for forvaltningen af skovene kan acceptere skovningskoncessioner og udvidelse af landbrugsbedrifter, som skaber indtžgter og arbejdspladser. 
The precarious finances of most of the States and municipalities and the vested economic interests of some State and local elites make it possible for local governments to accept logging concessions and agriculture expansion, which generate revenue and employment to the detriment of forest management.
I nogle stater har modellen derfor ikke haft megen effekt p den offentlige politik, eller den er i vžrste fald blevet brugt som et rent restriktivt instrument. 
Because of these, in some States the model has had little impact on public policy or, at worst, has been applied as a purely restrictive instrument.
Hertil kommer, at den i hżjere grad er blevet brugt til kortlžgning af omrder med muligheder for yderligere żkonomisk ekspansion end til miljż-forvaltning. 
Furthermore, it has been used to identify areas of further economic expansion rather than for environmental management.
Staten Mato Grosso, hvor modellen er bedst udviklet, var imidlertid ogs den stat, som havde den vžrste skovrydningsprocent i 2004. 
The State of Mato Grosso, where the model is best developed, was, however, the state with the worst deforestation rate in 2004.
Programmet har ikke vžret i stand til at sikre, at miljżspżrgsml er blevet integreret effektivt i staterne i andre sektorer som landbrug, skovbrug, undervisning og transport. 
The programme has not been able to guarantee that environmental issues are effectively mainstreamed in other sectors like agriculture, forestry, education, transport, etc. in the States.
Det er et helt afgżrende aspekt, eftersom programmet gennemfżres i en politisk og żkonomisk sammenhžng med kortsigtede udviklingsvenlige politikker og prioriteter, som ikke falder sammen med bžredygtig udvikling. 
This is a crucial aspect as the programme operates in a political and economic context of short-term pro-development policies and priorities that do not coincide with sustainable development.
Denne pauvre mainstreamingpolitik betyder, at de enkelte staters miljżagenturer i alt for hżj grad m forlade sig p command and control-procedurer. 
The poor environmental mainstreaming policy means that State environmental agencies have to rely too much on command-and-control procedures.
Denne tilgang begržnses imidlertid stžrkt af manglen p finansielle ressourcer og uddannet personale, s der er ingen effektiv udstedelse af tilladelser og kontrol. 
However, this is heavily constrained by the lack of financial resources and trained staff to so there is no effective licensing and control.
Urealistisk tilgang til finansiel levedygtighed 78. 
Unrealistic approach to financial viability 78.
For Kommissionens projekter i miljżsektoren har det som i andre sektorer vžret en forudsžtning, at de i sidste ende skulle vžre finansielt bžredygtige. 
Commission projects in the environment sector, as in other sectors, have included the assumption that they should ultimately be financially sustainable.
Det er et realistisk ml at for-fżlge, nr der er tale om indtžgtsskabende projekter. 
In revenue-generating projects this is a goal which can be realistically pursued.
Projekterne om spildevandsrensning i Mauritius og i Tanzanias nžststżrste by, Mwanza, havde sledes gjort gode fremskridt med hensyn til at n dette ml, idet vandtarifferne stżt var ved at blive żget til et niveau, hvor de vil kunne džkke projekternes drifts-og afskriv-ningsomkostninger. 
Indeed, in wastewater treatment projects in Mauritius and TanzaniaŐs second city, Mwanza, good progress was being made towards this objective, water tariffs steadily being increased towards the level where they would cover operational and depreciation costs.