natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
6 Det slovenske LDP indeholder en detaljeret analyse af situationen i skovbrugssektoren i lyset af sektorens stærke og svage sider (kapitel 3.1.2). Det fokuserer på særlige aspekter af den slovenske skovbrugssektor, og der foreslås en række forbedringer. 
6 as for slovenia, the rdp provides for a detailed ‘analysis of the situation in the light of strengths and weaknesses’ in respect of the forestry sector (chapter 3.1.2). it looks at specific features of the forestry sector in slovenia and suggests improvements.
Sektoren er præget af lav arbejdseffektivitet, og forholdene i skovene kan forbedres, ved at de gøres mere tilgængelige, f.eks. ved at anlægge skovveje og -stier. Forvaltningsomkostningerne er desuden høje, hvilket bl.a. skyldes en svag og utilstrækkelig infrastruktur og manglende skovbrugsudstyr. 
Low labour performance characterises the sector and the situation of forests can be improved by better accessibility of forests, e.g. providing forest roads and trails. in addition, weak and inadequate infrastructure and insufficient equipment for forestry work are mentioned as reasons for high management costs.
7 I det østrigske LDP peges der på: a) behovet for at forbedre skovenes økonomiske og miljømæssige værdi ved at introducere flere sorter (kapitel 3.1.3, s. 
7 as for austria, the rdp identifies the following needs: (a) to increase the economic and ecological value of forests by reinforcing a mixed stand composition (chapter 3.1.3, p.
34) og b) behovet for at forbedre skovbrugssektorens konkurrenceevne (kapitel 3.2.2.1, s. 
34); (b) to enhance the competitiveness of the forestry sector (chapter 3.2.2.1, p.
63). Det skal opnås ved at stille mere råtræ til rådighed og dermed forbedre energiforsyningen. Det har vist sig, at foranstaltning 122 (M 122) blev udeladt af tabellen på side 64 (SWOT) på grund af en redaktionel fejl. 
63). this shall be achieved by increasing the availability of the raw material wood and, consequently, increasing the energy supply. it has been found that M 122 in the table on page 64 (sWot) was omitted due to an editorial mistake. this will be corrected by introducing it in the frame of the next programme modification.
8 I Galicien er skovbrugssektorens specifikke behov, der blev klarlagt i SWOT-analysen, herunder skovbrugsbedrifternes ringe økonomiske betydning (s. 
8 as for Galicia, the specific needs for the forestry sector identified in the sWot analysis, such as the small economic dimension of forest holdings (p.
45 i LDP’et), direkte knyttet til og omfattet af foranstaltning 122. 
45 rdp) are directly linked with and addressed by measure 122. the need to increase the economic dimension of forests is clearly recognised within the rational for intervention of measure 122.
45 30. Kommissionen er af den opfattelse, at behov og muligheder var beskrevet tilstrækkelig klart til, at programforan-staltning 122 var passende og gennemførlig i hvert enkelt tilfælde, selv om de pågældende analyser i visse tilfælde kunne have været bedre. tekstboks 1 Med hensyn til Slovenien: LDP’et peger klart på en række svagheder i skovbrugssektoren. 
45 30. the commission takes the view that needs and opportunities were described with sufficient clarity to make programming measure 122 appropriate and possible in each case, even if the analyses in question could have been improved in some cases. box 1 With regard to slovenia: its rdp clearly identifies a number of weaknesses in the forestry sector. for example, equipment of low technical standard and poor working techniques are listed as being among the causes of a low utilisation of forests’ economic potential.
Mere åbne/tilgæn-gelige skove kan ifølge LDP’et gøre det billigere at skaffe træ og dermed bidrage til at øge indtægterne fra skovene. 
Making forests more open/accessible is described as an opportunity to lower the cost of obtaining wood and therefore to help to increase income from forests.
Der er dog intet lovkrav om en separat behovsanalyse baseret på modtagertyper, og Slovenien foretog ikke en sådan analyse. 
However, with respect to a separate analysis of needs based on types of beneficiaries this was not a legal requirement and slovenia did not provide such an analysis.
Svaghederne var ganske vist ikke nævnt udtrykkeligt i det østrigske LDP, men det drejer sig for Østrigs vedkommende om små skoves begrænsede rentabilitet og ringe adgang til biomasse. Den potentielle konkurrenceevne er som følge heraf begrænset. Forvaltningsmyndighederne forventede på grundlag af erfaringerne fra den foregående programmeringsperiode, at ca. 
While the weaknesses were not explicitly mentioned in the austrian rdp, these weaknesses were identified in the case of austria as: limited profitability of small forests and small availability of biomass. as a consequence, the potential competitiveness is reduced. the experience gained during the previous programming period led the managing authority to expect that about 50 000 ha would be covered. this omission will be corrected by including them in the next programme modification.
31. Kommissionen mener, at landdistriktsprogrammerne blev godkendt på et passende grundlag bestående af den information, der blev tilvejebragt i forbindelse med udarbejdelsen af rapporten om gennemførelsen af EU’s skov-brugsstrategi, de løbende drøftelser med repræsentanter for interessenterne (f.eks. i Den Rådgivende Gruppe for Skovbrug og Korkproduktion) og de bilaterale forhandlinger med medlemsstaterne og regionerne. 
31. the commission considers that the information gained through the Eu forestry strategy implementation report preparation, the continuous discussion with stakeholder representatives (e.g. through the advisory group on forestry and cork) and the series of bilateral negotiations with Member states and regions provided an adequate basis for approving rural development programmes. please also see reply to paragraph 30.
Kommissionens svar 32. Kommissionen gør opmærksom på, at medlemsstaterne og regionerne i henhold til subsidiaritetsprincippet har et vidt skøn på de nævnte områder, hvilket bl.a. fremgår af Europa-Parlamentets betænkning om gennemførelsen af EU’s skovbrugsstrategi (A6-0015/2006). 
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 32. the commission notes that the principle of subsidiarity hands considerable discretion to Member states and regions in respect of the points raised — in line, for example, with the European parliament’s ‘report on the implementation of a European union forestry strategy’ (a6-0015/2006).
En række særlige forhold gør sig gældende for Bulgarien9 (der faktisk har anmeldt visse udgifter), Rumænien10 og Grækenland11. 
Various points should be borne in mind with regard to the particular cases of Bulgaria9 (which had in fact declared some expenditure), romania10 and Greece11.
10 rumænien havde ganske rigtigt ikke anmeldt nogen udgifter ved udgangen af 2011. Landet er ved at gennemføre sit første LDP efter tiltrædelsen af EU og har mange nye foranstaltninger, der skal gennemføres. 
10 romania had indeed not declared any expenditure by the end of 2011. as it is implementing its first post-accession rdp there are several new measures to be implemented. it launched the first call for measure 122 in 2012.
11 Den 10. januar 2011 blev der vedtaget en ny ændring af det græske program, og Grækenland valgte ikke at benytte sig af EU-støtte til foranstaltning 122. Særberetning nr. 8/2013 – Støtte fra Den Europæiske Landbrugsfond for Udvikling af Landdistrikterne til forbedring af skovenes økonomiske værdi 
11 on 10 January 2011 a new modification of the greek programme was adopted and Greece opted for not using Eu support for measure 122. Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development
34. Det var ganske rigtigt tilfældet i Ungarn før 2010. Forvaltningsmyndigheden ændrede støttebetingelserne i 2010 for at sikre, at støtten står i forhold til størrelsen af de registrerede skovarealer, og nedsatte den maksimale støtte pr. ansøgning. 
34. indeed, this was the case in Hungary prior to 2010. the managing authority changed the eligibility requirements in 2010 to make support proportional to the size of the registered forest areas and decreased the maximum support per application.
12 Hvad angår Ungarn henvises til svaret til punkt 37. Med hensyn til Slovenien indeholder det slovenske LDP et krav om, at støtte til investeringer i anlæggelse eller udbedring af skovveje skal ydes i henhold til den gældende skovforvaltningsplan, og at støtte til investeringer i fældning og udtagning af træ og i anlæggelse af skovstier skal ydes i henhold til skovbrugsplanen. 
With regard to the particular case of slovenia: the slovenian rdp includes a requirement that the support to investments in construction or reconstruction of forest roads must comply with the applicable forest management plan and the support to investments in felling and extraction of wood and for forest tracks must comply with the silvicultural plan. in austria, beneficiaries of measure 122 are defined in the rdp as forest owners, their associations and communes. in case of support for associations of forest owners the association as such might not own any specific area of forest.
Hvert medlem af sammenslutningen skal imidlertid være skovejer som fastsat i artikel 27 i forordning (EF) nr. 
However, each member of the association must be a forest owner as stipulated in art. 27 of reg.
1698/2005. Modtagertyperne blev præciseret yderligere, og »andre modtagere« blev slettet i forbindelse med den anden programændring. Kommissionens meddelelse om godkendelse af denne programændring blev sendt til Østrig den 27. april 2009 (ARES(2009) 79362). 
(Eu) 1698/2005. the type of beneficiaries was further clarified, deleting ‘other beneficiaries’ at the occasion of the second programme modification. the coM notification on the approval of this programme amendment was sent to at on 27 april 2009 (arEs (2009) 79362.
Kommissionens svar 35. Italien (Toscana): Bemærkningen er taget til efterretning. Landdistriktsprogrammet for Toscana for 2007-2013 blev ændret i overensstemmelse hermed den 11. december 2012. 
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 35. it (tuscany): the observation has been taken into account. the rural development programme for tuscany 2007–13 has been modified accordingly on 11/12/2012.
Kommissionen påpeger, at mange maskiner både kan bruges til skovbrug og landbrug. Kommissionen mener, at det bør være muligt at yde støtte til disse maskiner, selv om de både kan anvendes til landbrugsformål og skovbrugsformål. (Investeringer i maskiner, der kun kan bruges i landbruget, bør dog ikke støttes gennem foranstaltning 122). 
47 38. the commission notes that many items of machinery can be used for both forestry and farming. the commission considers that such items should not be excluded from investment support simply because they have an agricultural application beside a silvicultural application. (on the other hand, investments in machines which can only be used for agriculture should not be supported through measure 122.)
Hvad angår Ungarn: I Ungarn besluttede myndighederne i 2010 at tilpasse listen over støtteberettigede maskiner, så den kun omfattede maskiner, der er »skovbrugsspecifikke«. 
With regard to the particular case of Hungary: in 2010 the Hungarian authorities decided to adjust the list of eligible machines, restricting them to items which are ‘forestry-specific’.
39. Kommissionen vil generelt bemærke, at der er opstået problemer med fortolkningen af reglerne med hensyn til afgrænsningen mellem foranstaltning 122 og 123. 
39. in general terms, the commission notes that difficulties of legal interpretation have arisen regarding the demarcation between measures 122 and 123. it has proposed that these two measures be merged in the post-2013 period.
41. Nogle maskiner kan både anvendes til skovbrug og landbrug. At en maskine kan anvendes til landbrug bør ikke betyde, at der ikke kan ydes støtte til anskaffelse af denne maskine under foranstaltning 122, forudsat at den også kan anvendes til skovbrug. 
41. some machinery can be used both for forestry and agriculture. the fact that a machine could also be used for agriculture should not make its purchase ineligible for support under measure 122 if it can be used in forestry work. taking this approach could force some operators to buy two machines instead of one, which would be inefficient.
Hvad angår Ungarn: I Ungarn besluttede myndighederne i 2010 at tilpasse listen over støtteberettigede maskiner, så den kun omfattede maskiner, der er »skovbrugsspecifikke«. Kommissionens svar 43. 
With regard to the particular case of Hungary: in 2010 the Hungarian authorities decided to adjust the list of eligible machines, restricting them to items which are ‘forestry-specific’.
Gennemførelsesforordningen indeholder også indikatorer (bilag VIII til forordning (EF) nr. 
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 43. the indicators are not established only through guidelines, but are included in the implementing regulation (annex Viii of regulation 1974/2006). result indicators are not set at measure level, but at axis level, reflecting the fact that it is the combined action of a range of measures which causes the result.
13 Målet for akse 1 er »forbedring af landbrugets og skovbrugets konkurrenceevne gennem støtte til omstrukturering, udvikling og innovation«. Særberetning nr. 8/2013 – Støtte fra Den Europæiske Landbrugsfond for Udvikling af Landdistrikterne til forbedring af skovenes økonomiske værdi 
13 the objective of axis 1 is ‘competitiveness of agriculture and forestry by supporting restructuring, development and innovation’. Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development
Med hensyn til de investeringer, der angiveligt vedrørte »landbrug«, mener Kommissionen, at en investering i kastanjer ikke nødvendigvis skal betragtes som »land-brugsmæssig«, og at den kan forbedre værdien af en skov, eftersom kastanjer gror på træer, og disse træer kan udgøre en del af en skov. 
With regard to investments which supposedly concerned ‘agriculture’, the commission is of the view that an investment related to chestnuts need not necessarily be considered ‘agricultural’ and may improve the value of a forest — as chestnuts grow on trees and these trees may form part of a forest.
Kommissionens svar Med hensyn til forarbejdning og afsætning bemærker Kommissionen, at det i visse tilfælde er vanskeligt at trække en klar skillelinje mellem aktiviteter i forbindelse med udtynding/fældning og aktiviteter i forbindelse med forarbejdning/afsætning. Køb og anvendelse af udstyr til flishugning kan f.eks. være med til at tilføre organisk materiale til jorden og mindske risikoen for brand og angreb af skadedyr, hvilket vil øge skovens værdi. 
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN With regard to processing and marketing, the commission notes that in some cases it is difficult to draw a clear dividing line between what activities related to thinning/fell-ing and activities related to processing/marketing. for example, the purchase and use of wood-chipping equipment can help to provide organic matter for the soil and reduce the risk of fire and pests which would increase the value of the forest. if the equipment is suited for these purposes, it is considered eligible.
Hvis udstyret er velegnet til disse formål, anses det for støtteberettiget. Der bør dog ikke ydes støtte under foranstaltning 122 til køb af udstyr, der skal anvendes til fremstilling af flis til brændsel. 
However, the purchase of equipment for the purpose of producing wood chips for fuel should not be supported under measure 122. the commission has proposed to combine the current measures 122 and 123 after 2013.
Med hensyn til driftsomkostninger og forbrugsgoder henviser Kommissionen til sit svar til punkt 35. 
With regard to operating costs and consumables, the commission refers the court to its reply to paragraph 35.
52. Beslutninger om, hvilke specifikke kategorier af private ejere der skal støttes, bør træffes i forbindelse med udarbejdelsen af/forhandlingerne om et givet LDP på grundlag af en SWOT-analyse af det pågældende programområde. samlet svar til punkt 52 og 53. 
52. decisions about which specific categories of private owners to support belongs to the process of formulating/ negotiating a given rdp, on the basis of a sWot analysis related to the programme area in question. common reply to paragraphs 52 and 53. the combination of a number of measures from the current period into one measure — as proposed by the commission — provides a clearer overview. in particular, measures 122 and 123 from the current period will be combined into a single ‘sub-measure’ with one set of maximum aid intensities rather than two.
De erfaringer, der er gjort, vil desuden blive udnyttet i den kommende periode — bl.a. ved hjælp af vejledning og under programmeringsprocessen. 
Moreover, lessons have been learned which will be applied for the coming period — especially through guidance and within the programming process.
Kommissionens svar 55. Kommissionen mener, at de problemer, der findes, i vid udstrækning vil kunne løses gennem vejledning, ved at slå den nuværende foranstaltning 122 og 123 sammen og ved at fokusere mere på visse spørgsmål under programmeringsprocessen. 
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 55. the commission considers that, where problems exist, they can be addressed primarily through guidance, through the combination of the current measures 122 and 123 and through greater attention to certain issues during the programming process.
Den vil dog undersøge i fællesskab med Rådet og Europa-Parlamentet, om visse problemer vil kunne løses, ved at begrebet »skov« defineres i de relevante retsakter, og ved at sammenhængen mellem investeringer i udstyr og forbedringer af skovenes økonomiske værdi forklares tydeligere. 
However, it will investigate with the council and the European parliament to what extent certain issues could be addressed in the relevant legal acts through a definition of ‘forest’ as well as a clearer explanation of the relationship between investments in equipment and improvements to the economic value of forests.
Kommissionen analyserede forholdene i skovbrugssektoren i 2005 i det interne arbejdsdokument, der var knyttet som bilag til meddelelsen om gennemførelsen af EU’s skovbrugsstrategi (dokument SEC(2005) 333), og som afdækkede behovene og indeholdt strategiske målsætninger. 
56. the commission analysed the situation of the forest sector in the 2005 commission staff Working document, which formed an annex to the communication on the implementation of the Eu forestry strategy (document reference sEc(2005) 333), which identified needs and strategic objectives. the commission is in the process of reviewing the 1998 Eu forestry strategy. the adoption of the ‘communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European Economic and social committee and the committee of the regions; together with our for-ests: a new Eu forest strategy’ is intended for 2013 and the communication and a staff Working document annexed to the communication will provide an Eu-level analysis of the Eu forestry sector.
8/2013 – Støtte fra Den Europæiske Landbrugsfond for Udvikling af Landdistrikterne til forbedring af skovenes økonomiske værdi 50 57. »Skovenes økonomiske værdi« er et velkendt begreb inden for skovbrugsvidenskab og -praksis, og det er også velkendt, hvilke operationer der kan forbedre denne værdi på længere sigt. 
Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development 50 57. in forest science and practice the concept of ‘economic value of forests’ is well recognised, and a set of operations leading to a likely increase in value in the long term is also well recognised.
58. Kommissionen vil lægge tilstrækkelig vægt på dette spørgsmål under forhandlinger om fremtidige LDP’er og yde den nødvendige vejledning. 
58. the commission will pay the necessary attention to this issue in the negotiation of future rdps and will provide guidance as necessary.
Kommissionens svar anbefaling 1 Kommissionen er enig i, at den bør fortsætte med at definere og vurdere behovet for at forbedre den økonomiske værdi af skovene i EU med henblik på generelt at berettige, at der afsættes den relevante støtte som led i landdistriktspolitikken. Den mener, at det fremgår af de undersøgelser, der allerede er foretaget, at der foreligger et generelt behov på EU-plan. Det drejer sig (bl.a.) om følgende undersøgelser: — »Prospects for the market supply of wood and other forest products from areas with fragmented forest-ownership structures« http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/ supply-wood/index_en.htm — »Good practice guidance on the sustainable mobilisation of wood in Europe« http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/fore/publi/ forest_brochure_en.pdf. — »Study of the Effects of Globalization on the Economic Viability of EU Forestry« http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/ viability_forestry/index_en.htm. 
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN recommendation 1 the commission accepts that it should continue to define and assess the need to improve the economic value of forests in the Eu, in such a way as to justify in general terms the inclusion of relevant support in rural development policy. it considers that studies already available indicate needs in general terms at Eu level. these studies include (among others): — ‘prospects for the market supply of wood and other forest products from areas with fragmented forest-ownership structures’; http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/supply‐ wood/index_en.htm — ‘Good practice guidance on the sustainable mobilisation of wood in Europe’; http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/fore/publi/forest_ brochure_en.pdf — ‘study of the Effects of Globalisation on the Economic Viability of Eu forestry’. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/ viability_forestry/index_en.htm the commission considers that more specific needs should continue to be assessed and defined at national and programme level by the competent national and regional authorities. the commission believes it should continue to define basic eligibility conditions at Eu level, but that more precise eligibility conditions and selection criteria should be set within individual rdps. it believes that its proposals for a rural development policy for after 2013 follow this approach.
Der er dog brug for yderligere vejledning herom. Kommissionen vil også sammen med Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet undersøge, hvordan det kan klarlægges i de relevante retsakter, at der skal være en tilknytning mellem investeringer i udstyr og forbedringer af skovenes økonomiske værdi. 
However, additional guidance in this matter should be provided. the commission will also investigate with the council and the European parliament to what extent the desired relationship between investments in equipment and improvements to the economic value of forests could be clarified in the relevant legal acts.
51 anbefaling 2 Kommissionen gør opmærksom på, at medlemsstaterne og regionerne i henhold til subsidiaritetsprincippet har et vidt skøn på de nævnte områder, hvilket bl.a. fremgår af Europa-Parlamentets betænkning om gennemførelsen af EU’s skovbrugsstrategi (A6-0015/2006). 
51 recommendation 2 the commission notes that the principle of subsidiarity hands considerable discretion to Member states and regions in respect of the points raised — in line, for example, with the European parliament’s ‘report on the implementation of a European union forestry strategy’ (a6-0015/2006).