natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Revisionen viste, at der var forskellige fortolkninger af hjemsendelsesforanstaltningerne, som i henhold til beslutningen kunne best i Čoplysning og rdgivning om programmer for frivillig hjemsendelse og om situationen i hjemlandetÇ. 
The audit revealed differences as regards the interpretation of the repatriation measure, which is indicatively described as providing Ôinformation and advice about voluntary return programmes and the situation in the country of originŐ.
Der kan ogs vžre tale om Čgenerelle eller erhvervsfaglige uddannelsesforanstaltninger samt hjžlp til genetableringÇ (1). 
It may also include Ôgeneral or vocational training and help with resettle-mentŐ (1).
Rdet erkendte, at Čder er behov for konkret stżtte for at sikre, at flygtninge og fordrevne personer ud fra kendskab til forholdene kan beslutte at forlade en medlemsstats omrde og vende tilbage til deres hjemland, hvis de żnsker detÇ (2). 
The Council recognised that Ôpractical support is needed to create or improve conditions enabling refugees and displaced persons to take an informed decision to leave the territory of the Member State and return home, should they so wishŐ (2).
I nogle medlemsstater blev hjemsendelsesforanstaltningerne i stor udstržkning anvendt til at betale asylansżgernes flybilletter til hjemlandet. 
In some Member States the repatriation measure was to a large extent used to pay asylum seekersŐ return air fares.
Reglerne for, hvilke personer der kunne ansżge om hjem-sendelsesstżtte, blev fortolket meget forskelligt i medlemsstaterne. 
Major interpretation differences existed in the Member States over who could apply for repatriation assistance.
Fonden medfinansierede stżtte til asylansżgere, som havde fet afslag p deres ansżgning, ogs selv om beslutningen om at vende hjem ikke var frivillig (3). 
The funding of failed asylum seeke rs was co-financed by the Fund, even when the decision to return home was not a voluntary one (3).
Det frivillige aspekt (1) fremhžves i ERF-reglerne og er blevet styrket i ERF II (4). 
This voluntary element (1) is highlighted in the ERF rules and has been reinforced in ERF II (4).
Definitionen af hvilke personer, som kunne modtage stżtte til at vende tilbage til deres oprindelsesland, var heller ikke džkkende, jf. nedenfor. 
Likewise, the definition of eligible persons whose return to their country of origin might be funded is inadequate, as illustrated below.
De enkelte medlemsstater kan anvende en praksis, hvor det er de individuelle omstžndigheder og ikke oprindelseslandet, som er afgżrende for, om der gives asyl. 
Individual Member States may apply policies on the individual merits of asylum claims, that is, not based on the country of origin.
Eksempler p en effektiv forvaltning af ERF 37. 
Positive examples of ERF management 37.
P trods af problemer ved ivžrksžttelsen og forvaltningen af ERF var der mange eksempler p effektive forvaltningssystemer. 
Despite problems in the set-up and management of the ERF, there were numerous examples of good management systems.
Resultaterne af Kommissionens overvgning og korrigerende foranstaltninger var utilstržkkelige 38. 
Monitoring and remedial action by the Commission had insufficient results 38.
Medlemsstaterne er ansvarlige for udvžlgelsen, den finansielle forvaltning og administrationen af projekterne. 
The Member States are responsible for the selection, financial management and administration of projects.
Rdets beslutning sigter mod at give medlemsstaterne den fornżdne frihed til at implementere programmerne i overensstemmelse med deres behov. 
The Council Decision is intended to provide Member States with the necessary freedom to implement the programme according to their needs.
I fżrste ržkke er det medlemsstaterne, der er ansvarlige for den finansielle kontrol med foranstaltningerne. 
In the first instance, Member States are required to take responsibility for the financial control of an action.
De skal fżrst og fremmest sikre sig, at midlerne anvendes i overensstemmelse med princippet om forsvarlig żkonomisk forvaltning. 
In particular, they must ensure that the funds are used in accordance with the principle of sound financial management.
Kommissionen skal imidlertid sżrge for, at der i medlemsstaterne findes velfungerende forvaltnings-og kontrolsystemer, s det sikres, at fžllesskabsmidlerne anvendes produktivt og i overensstemmelse med reglerne. 
In spite of that, the Commission itself is charged with ensuring that Member States have smoothly functioning management and control systems so as to make certain that Community funds are efficiently and correctly used.
(3) Det Europžiske Rd for Flygtninge og Personer i Eksil sondrer mellem frivillig, obligatorisk og tvungen hjemsendelse, og p samlingen i Rdet (retlige og indre anliggender) den 12.-13. oktober 2005 udtalte det, at det er vigtigt at sondre mellem frivillig hjemsendelse af personer, som frit vžlger at udżve deres ret til at vende tilbage til deres oprindelsesland eller sždvanlige opholdssted, og personer, som ikke har juridisk grundlag for at blive, og som indvilliger i at vende hjem (erklžring fra Det Europžiske Rd for Flygtninge og Personer i Eksil, s. 
(3) The European Council on Refugees and Exiles distinguishes between voluntary, mandatory and forced return: Ôit is important to distinguish between voluntary repatriation of persons who freely choose to exercise their right to return to their country of origin or habitual residence and those who do not have a legal basis for remaining and consent to returnŐ. European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Statement on Justice and Home Affairs Council 12Đ13 October 2005, p.
4). 
4.
(4) Artikel 4, stk. 1, i beslutning 2004/904/EF. 
(4) Article 4(1) of Decision 2004/904/EC.
I Det Forenede Kongerige tegnede asylansżgere fra de central-europžiske lande, f.eks. Den Tjekkiske Republik og Polen, som havde ansżgt om asyl inden EU-udvidelsen, og som havde fet afslag p deres ansżgning, sig for stżrstedelen af de personer, som havde fet deres returbilletter betalt over ERF i 2003 (332 tjekkiske og 125 polske statsborgere). 
In the United Kingdom, failed asylum seekers from Central European countries such as the Czech Republic and Poland, who had sought asylum before EU accession, accounted for the highest numbers of persons whose return flights were funded by the ERF in 2003 (i.e. 332 Czech nationals and 125 Polish nationals).
Tyskland og Sverige etablerede et godt organiseret forvaltningssystem med procedurer, formularer og beretninger, som gjorde det muligt for den nationale myndighed at hndtere et stort antal projekter. 
Germany and Sweden introduced a well thought-out management system, including procedures, forms and reports, which allowed the national authority to handle a large number of projects.
Tyskland og Sverige fortolkede bestemmelserne om stżtteberettigede grupper restriktivt og ydede kun stżtte til anerkendte flygtninge, som havde tilladelse til at opholde sig i en af medlemsstaterne, men som havde besluttet at vende tilbage til deres hjemlande. 
Germany and Sweden applied the stricter interpretation of eligible groups, and only funded recognised refugees who were permitted to reside in one of the Member States but who had decided to return to their home countries.
Det Forenede Kongerige og Italien anvendte derimod primžrt hjemsendelsesforanstaltningen til at yde stżtte til afviste asylansżgere og asylansżgere, som havde fet afslag p deres ansżgning, og ikke til personer som havde opnet tidsubegržnset opholdstilladelse eller flygtningestatus. 
In contrast, the United Kingdom and Italy mainly used the repatriation measure to fund failed and rejected asylum seekers, excluding those who had been granted indefinite leave to remain or refugee status.
(1) Artikel 4, stk. 4, i beslutning 2000/596/EF. 
(1) Article 4(4) of Decision 2000/596/EC.
(2) Betragtning 7 i beslutning 2000/596/EF. 
(2) Preamble 7 of Decision 2000/596/EC.
31.7.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 178/9 39. 
31.7.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 178/9 39.
Kommissionen har gennemfżrt kontrolbesżg med henblik p at overvge gennemfżrelsen af ERF I, men generelt er det ikke altid lykkedes den at sikre, at der anvendes forsvarlige forvaltningspraksis i alle medlemsstater. 
Overall, the Commission carried out monitoring visits for ERF I but could not always ensure sound management practices in all Member States.
I henhold til ERF II (1) skal Kommissionen regelmžssigt overvge fonden i samarbejde med medlemsstaterne og ogs evaluere foranstaltningernes virkning og deres komplementaritet med andre fžllesskabsinstrumenter. 
According to ERF II (1), the Commission is to carry out regular monitoring in co-operation with the Member States, including evaluating the impact of actions and their complementarity with other Community instruments.
Ud fra de projekter, den besżgte, kan Retten konstatere, at ERF har resulteret i en ržkke positive žndringer i medlemsstaternes indsats, primžrt med hensyn til afprżvning af nyskabende projekter og integration af resultaterne af sdanne projekter i de nationale strategier. 
In the light of the projects it visited, the Court can state that the ERF produced some positive changes in national efforts, mainly with regard to testing innovatory projects and integrating their results into national strategies.
Et vellykket projekt i Det Forenede Kongerige var en n til n-mentorordning for flygtninge, hvor frivillige mentorer, som er statsborgere i modtagerlandet, hjžlper flygtninge med at tilpasse sig og blive integreret i samfundet i det land, der har givet dem asyl. 
One successful United Kingdom project concerned a one-to-one refugee mentoring scheme, whereby volunteer mentors, who are nationals of the host country assist refugees to adapt and integrate into the society of the country granting them asylum.
Der blev udarbejdet en personlig integrations-plan, som omfattede sprogundervisning, aktiviteter, som skulle fremme flygtningenes kendskab til den by, som de bor i, og kontakt til personer uden for flygtningesamfundet, lžre dem, hvordan man klarer administrative spżrgsml, og hjžlpe dem med at finde et arbejde. 
A personal integration scheme was designed which included language training, getting to know the city of residence and persons outside the refugee community, learning how to handle administrative issues and assistance with finding employment.
Projektet finansieres nu med nationale midler. Retten konstaterede en ržkke alvorlige svagheder i Det Forenede Kongerige (f.eks. utilstržkkeligt revisionsspor i forbindelse med projektudvžlgelse og utilstržkkelig overvgning af projekterne). 
The project is now being financed with national funds In the United Kingdom the Court detected serious shortcomings (e.g. an inadequate audit trail on project selection, insufficient monitoring of projects).
Inden Retten gennemfżrte sin revision i begyndelsen af 2005, havde Kommissionen gennemfżrt et kontrolbesżg i 2002 og en efterfżlgende revision i 2003. 
Prior to the CourtŐs audit in early 2005, the Commission had carried out one monitoring visit in 2002 and one ex post audit in 2003.
Alligevel var flere af de konstaterede svagheder stadig ikke blevet afhjulpet. 
Nonetheless, several shortcomings observed have not yet been resolved.
Som Kommissionen allerede havde konstateret under et kontrolbesżg i Żstrig, havde de nationale myndigheder delegeret en ržkke nżgleopgaver i forbindelse med forvaltningen af ERF-foranstaltninger til et privat firma. 
As already discovered by the Commission during a monitoring visit to Austria, certain core tasks of the management of the ERF actions had been delegated by the national authority to a private company.
Det er ikke i overensstemmelse med finansforordningens bestemmelser om delegering af opgaver til tredjemand. 
This is not in conformity with the Financial Regulation as regards delegation of tasks to third parties.
Der gik lang tid, fżr de korrigerende foranstaltninger, Kommissionen havde anbefalet, blev ivžrksat. 
The corrective action recommended by the Commission was implemented late.
P fire r ivžrksatte Italien n offentlig indkaldelse af forslag. 
Italy launched one public call for proposals in four years.
Desuden var indkaldelsen kun ben for offentlige myndigheder, hvorved andre potentielle ansżgere blev udelukket fra at deltage i ERF. 
Furthermore it was restricted to municipalities, thus excluding other potential applicants from taking part in the ERF.
Sigtet med Rettens revision var at undersżge, om oprettelsen af ERF havde resulteret i en žndring i de nationale udgifter p asylomrdet. 
The CourtŐs aim was to analyse whether the creation of the ERF had resulted in a change in national spending in the area of asylum.
Der var imidlertid kun f tilgžngelige oplysninger bde i medlemsstaterne og i Kommissionen. 
However, information was limited, both in the Member States and at the Commission.
Det skyldtes til dels, at de fleste medlemsstater ikke havde sžrskilte budgetposter for udgifter til flygtninge eller asylansżgere p deres budgetter. 
This was partly due to the fact that most Member States did not have specific budget lines for expenditure on refugees or asylum seekers in their national budgets.
Det var derfor ikke muligt at drage en endelig konklusion om dette spżrgsml. 
It was thus not possible to draw a final conclusion on this point.
Midtvejsevalueringen (2) omhandlede ikke fondens additionalitet, men fokuserede i stedet p, hvorvidt medlemsstaterne havde medfinansieret de enkelte ERF-projekter. 
The mid-term evaluation (2) did not examine the additionality of the Fund, but focused instead on how far Member States had co-financed the individual ERF projects.
Retten har ikke gennemget den endelige rapport, eftersom den ikke var blevet vedtaget p det tidspunkt, hvor revisionen blev gennemfżrt. 
The final report has not been examined as it had not been adopted at the time the audit was carried out.
Der var opstillet en ržkke indikatorer vedrżrende foranstaltningernes virkning for s vidt angr de personer, der var omfattet af de tre foranstaltninger, men indikatorerne blev ikke systematisk overvget. 
Some indicators of the impact of actions with regard to persons concerned by the three measures were available, but they were not monitored systematically.
Kommissionen anvendte ogs Eurostats data om flygtninge til analyser, men sammenlignede dem ikke systematisk med de data, den modtog fra medlemsstaterne. 
Similarly, the Commission used Eurostat data on refugees for analysis purposes, but did not systematically compare them with data received from the Member States.
(1) Artikel 27 i beslutning 2004/904/EF. 
(1) Article 27 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
(2) Generaldirektoratet for Retlige og Indre Anliggender: Mid-term Evaluation of the European Refugee Fund, endelig rapport, december 2003. 
(2) Justice and Home Affairs DG, Mid-term Evaluation of the European Refugee Fund, Final Report, December 2003.
I andre tilfžlde havde ERF en positiv effekt p den nationale asylpolitik, fordi den satte gang i, at der ex novo blev ivžrksat nationale programmer. 
In other cases the ERF had a positive effect on national asylum policy, as it triggered the creation ex novo of national programmes.
KONKLUSION 45. 
CONCLUSION 45.
Midlerne fra Den Europžiske Flygtningefond blev tildelt p basis af statistiske data. 
The European Refugee Fund allocated its resources according to statistical data.
Retten konstaterede, at disse data ikke var fyldestgżrende, ensartede, sammenlignelige og plidelige. 
The Court found that these data were not complete, consistent, comparable and reliable.
Fżrst i 2005 efter flere rs forberedelser fremsatte Kommissionen forslag til en forordning om harmonisering af statistikkerne (jf. punkt 20, 21 og 22). 
It took the Commission until 2005, after several years of preparatory actions, to propose a regulation on the harmonisation of statistics (see paragraphs 20 to 22).
Kommissionen offentliggjorde nogle af gennemfżrelsesbestemmelserne sent, og medlemsstaterne havde derfor ikke klare retningslinjer i ERFŐs opstartsfase. 
Certain implementing rules were published late by the Commission, leaving the Member States without clear instructions in the start-up phase of the ERF.
Den administrative procedure for tildeling af midler var tung, og det fżrte til betalingsforsinkelser i medlemsstaterne (jf. punkt 26-33). 
The cumbersome administrative process for the allocation of funds led to payment delays in the Member States (see paragraphs 26 to 33).
Centrale ERF-begreber (f.eks mlgrupper og stżtteberettigede foranstaltninger, jf. punkt 34, 35 og 36) var ikke klart defineret i Rdets beslutning. 
The Council Decision lacked clarity in defining the ERF key terms (e.g. eligible target groups or fundable measures, see paragraphs 34 to 36).
Kommissionen vejledte ikke altid medlemsstaterne, s det kunne undgs, at bestemmelserne blev fortolket forskelligt. 
The Commission did not always guide Member States to help them avoid ambiguities in the interpretation of the rules.
Retten konstaterede ingen tilfžlde, hvor bestemmelserne systematisk blev misbrugt, men de blev ikke anvendt p samme mde i medlemsstaterne. 
Although no systematic misuse of the rules was observed, they were not applied in an equal way by the Member States.
Kommissionen kunne ikke altid sikre, at der blev anvendt forsvarlige forvaltningspraksis i medlemsstaterne (jf. punkt 39). 
The Commission could not always ensure sound management practices in the Member States (see paragraph 39).
Der forel kun f data om ERFŐs virkning p medlemsstaternes indsats p asylomrdet (jf. punkt 40, 41 og 42). 
There were limited data available on the impact of the ERF on national efforts in the area of asylum (see paragraphs 40 to 42).
Det italienske asylprogram blev gennemfżrt takket vžret medfinansiering fra ERF og har til sigte at modtage og bist asylansżgere og flygtninge p hele det nationale territorium. 
The Italian National Asylum Programme was made possible thanks to ERF co-funding, and aims to receive and assist asylum seekers and refugees throughout the national territory.
Programmet blev ivžrksat p initiativ af indenrigsministeriet, UNHCR og sammenslutningen af italienske kommunale myndigheder (ANCI). 
It was initiated by the Ministry of the Interior, UNHCR and the National Association of Italian Municipalities (ANCI).
C 178/10 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 31.7.2007 50. 
C 178/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 31.7.2007 50.
Resultaterne af den endelige rapport kunne ikke tages i betragtning, fordi den ikke var blevet vedtaget p det tidspunkt, hvor revisionen blev gennemfżrt (jf. punkt 16 og 41). 
The result of the final report could not be taken into consideration as it had not been adopted at the time the audit was carried out (see paragraphs 16 and 41).
ANBEFALINGER 51. 
RECOMMENDATIONS 51.
Kommissionen bżr fortsžtte arbejdet med at harmonisere de statistiske data. 
The Commission should continue its efforts to harmonise the statistical data.
Sidelżbende med harmoniseringen af de statistiske data bżr Kommissionen fastlžgge foranstaltninger, der gżr det muligt at verificere dataene. 
Whilst harmonising the statistical data, the Commission should lay down measures to allow the verification of data.
Kommissionen har žndret en ržkke statistiske data. 
The Commission has revised the statistical data.
Nr Kommissionen efterfżlgende žndrer statistiske data, bżr den ved fordelingen af midlerne tage de žndrede oplysninger i betragtning. 
When the Commission revises the statistics ex post, it should take account of the revised information when distributing funds.
Hvis Kommissionen ikke kan garantere, at statistikkerne er plidelige, og at midlerne tildeles i forhold til antallet af modtagne flygtninge og asylansżgere, bżr den overveje andre mder at tildele midlerne p, f.eks faste belżb. 
If the Commission cannot guarantee that the statistics are reliable and that the allocation of funds is in proportion to the number of refugees and asylum seekers received, other ways of allocating the funds, such as fixed amounts, should be considered.
Rettens revision viste, at nogle af bestemmelserne i ERF I, navnlig stżtteberettigelsereglerne, kunne fortolkes meget forskelligt. 
The CourtŐs audit has shown that some of the provisions of ERF I, in particular the eligibility rules, were open to significant differences of interpretation.
Retten anbefaler, at Kommissionen, Parlamentet og Rdet Ń under hensyntagen til Rettens revisionsresultater og de žndringer, der allerede er foretaget i ERF II Ń overvejer, om de żnsker, at ERF fremover skal have en klarere og mere pržcis mlretning. 
The Court recommends that the Commission, the Parliament and the Council should consider, in the light of the CourtŐs findings and the changes already made in ERF II, whether they wish the ERF to be more clearly and precisely targeted for the future.
Vedtaget af Revisionsretten i Luxembourg p mżdet den 21. marts 2007. 
This Report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 21 March 2007.
31.7.2007 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende BILAG I Sammenligning af fžllesskabsbestemmelserne om Den Europžiske Flygtningefond for perioden 2000-2004 (ERF I) og for perioden 2005-2010 (ERF II) INDLEDNING Denne sammenligning er baseret p fżlgende dokumenter: Ń Rdets beslutning 2000/596/EF af 28. september 2000 Ń Kommissionens beslutning 2001/275/EF af 20. marts 2001 Ń Kommissionens beslutning 2002/307/EF af 18. december 2001 Ń Rdets beslutning 2004/904/EF af 2. december 2004 Ń Begrundelse og forslag til Rdets beslutning SEK(2004)161 om Den Europžiske Flygtningefond for perioden 2005-2010 Ń Extended Impact Assessment. 
31.7.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union ANNEX I Comparison of Community regulations for the 2000 to 2004 European Refugee Fund period (ERF I) and the 2005 to 2010 period (ERF II) INTRODUCTION This comparison is based on the following documents: Ń Council Decision 2000/596/EC of 28 September 2000, Ń Commission Decision 2001/275/EC of 20 March 2001, Ń Commission Decision 2002/307/EC of 18 December 2001, Ń Council Decision 2004/904/EC of 2 December 2004, Ń Explanatory Memorandum and proposal for a Council Decision SEC 2004/161 establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2005 to 2010, Ń Extended Impact Assessment.
Arbejdsdokument fra Kommissionens tjenestegrene, SEC(2004)161 af 12.2.2004. 
Commission Staff Working paper, SEC (2004) 161, 12.2.2004.
Sammenligningen fremhžver kun de vžsentligste forskelle mellem ERF I og ERF II. 
The following comparison highlights only the main differences between ERF I and ERF II.
Der foretages hverken en analyse eller en vurdering af disse žndringer. 
It is neither an analysis nor an evaluation of those changes.
C 178/11 I. ML OG OPGAVER Ml Periode Mlgrupper Programmet for perioden 2000-2004 Programmet for perioden 2005-2010 Den Europžiske Flygtningefond er et finansielt instrument, som primžrt har til sigte at stżtte og fremme medlemsstaternes indsats med hensyn til modtagelse af flygtninge og fordrevne og fżlgerne heraf. 
C 178/11 I. OBJECTIVES AND TASKS Objective Time period Target groups Programming The 2000 to 2004 programme The 2005 to 2010 programme The European Refugee Fund is a financial instrument, the prime objective of which is to support and encourage the efforts made by the Member States in receiving and bearing the consequences of receiving refugees and displaced persons.
5 r, fra den 1. januar 2000 til den 31. december 2004. 
5 years, from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2004.
Fem mlgrupper: 1. 
Five target groups: 1.
Genve-konventionen 2. international beskyttelse, der ydes af en medlemsstat 3. personer, som har ansżgt om en af de former for beskyttelse, der er nžvnt i punkt 1 eller 2 4. midlertidig beskyttelse i en medlemsstat 5. personer, hvis ret til midlertidig beskyttelse er ved at blive behandlet i en medlemsstat. 
Geneva convention 2. international protection granted by a MS 3. persons who have applied for protection cf. points 1 or 2 4. temporary protection in a MS 5. persons whose right to temporary protection is being examined in a MS.
(Artikel 3, beslutning 2000/596/EF) Ingen flerrige programmer, rlige bevillinger. 
(Article 3, 2000/596/EC) No multiannual programmes, annual appropriations.