natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen har nøje drøftet anvendelse af »den sorte liste« i arbejdsgruppen vedrørende uregelmæssigheder og gensidig bistand — landbrugsprodukter — og skal fremlægge anden rapport for Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet med en omfattende vurdering af forordningen om denne sorte liste og med forslag til handlemuligheder. 
The Commission has extensively discussed the application of the Black List in the framework of the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing a comprehensive assessment of the black list Regulation and suggested options for action.
Kommissionen noterer sig Revisionsrettens anbefalinger og mener, at en del af dem hovedsagelig er rettet til medlemsstaterne. 
The Commission takes note of the recommendations of the Court and considers that some of these recommendations of the Court address primarily Member States.
C 269/26 DA Den Europæiske Unions Tidende 4.11.2004 koncentrere sig om en vurdering af de vedtagne og gennemførte foranstaltningers effektivitet og hensigtsmæssighed. 
C 269/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 Commission estimates that, in undertaking its tasks, it should primarily focus on the appraisal of the efficiency and adequacy of adopted and executed measures.
76. — — — — Kommissionen har opfordret medlemsstaterne til forsøgsvis at sammenholde OLAF ECR/595-data og dataene i debitorbogen. 
Ń Ń Ń Ń The Commission has invited Member States to proceed to a tentative reconciliation of OLAF ECR/595 data and the debtorsŐ ledgers data.
Kommissionen vil fremsætte et forslag om ændring af forordning (EF) nr. 1258/1999 med henblik på at effektivisere inddrivelsesprocessen. 
The Commission has undertaken to bring forward a proposal of modification to Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 which aims at enhancing the efficiency of the recovery process.
Modregning af uretmæssig betaling i andre EUGFL-betalinger er lovlig og almindelig i mange medlemsstater. 
The offset of irregular payments against other EAGGF payments is legal and common in many Member States.
Kommissionen vil søge at fremme denne praksis i alle betalingsorganer. 
The Commission will seek to promote this practice in all paying agencies.
Kommissionen minder om sidestillingsprincippet som omhandlet i traktatens artikel 280. 
The Commission would like to recall the principle of assimilation enshrined in Article 280 of the Treaty.
Den vil i denne sammenhæng gerne påpege EU-domstolens retspraksis, hvorefter regler, der gælder for sager med overtrædelser af fællesskabsretten, ikke kan være mindre strenge end regler for sager med overtrædelser af medlemsstaternes ret. 
In this context, it wishes to add that there is a constant caselaw of the ECJ which stipulates that the rules applicable in cases where there are violations to Community law cannot be less favourable than the rules applicable in cases where there are violations to national law.
Dette betyder imidlertid ikke, at fordringer i forbindelse med den præferencestatus. fælles landbrugspolitik får 77. per og en række proceduremæssige kriterier som dokumenteret i juli 2002. Der er nærmere redegjort herfor i punkt 44. 
Ń Efforts have been made to tackle the problem of discrepancies between Member State data and the ECR database. 77. number of procedural criteria documented in July 2002. They are detailed in answer to point 44.
Kommissionen har planlagt at tage initiativer på dette område. 
The Commission has foreseen to take action in this field.
Kommissionen har indledt denne proces. 
The Commission has started this process.
Kommissionens beretning fra 2002 om bedrageribekæmpelse kan betragtes som den første beretning, hvor de første skridt på grundlag af indvundne erfaringer blev taget. 
The Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud can be considered as the first report in which first steps were made on lessons learned.
Kommissionen har udførligt drøftet anvendelse af »den sorte liste« i arbejdsgruppen om uregelmæssigheder og gensidig bistand — landbrugsprodukter — og skal fremlægge anden beretning for Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet med en omfattende vurdering af forordningen om denne liste og forslag til handling (se også svaret i afsnit IX). 
The Commission has extensively discussed the application of the Black List in the framework of the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing comprehensive assessment of the black list Regulation and suggested options for action (see also answer in paragraph IX).
Kommissionen har anvendt fire grundlæggende princip- 
The Commission applied four guiding principles and a
Devžsentligstekendetegnvedinitiativetiperioden2000-2006 ................... 
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 4/2004 on the programming of the Community Initiative concerning trans-European cooperation Đ Interreg III, together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph of the EC Treaty) (2004/C 303/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................
KOMMISSIONENSRETNINGSLINJER ........................................... 
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................
Mlogindikatorer .................................................. 
Context ............................................................... MainfeaturesoftheInitiativefortheperiod2000to2006.......................
Mlretningafforanstaltningerne ........................................ 
TheCourtŐsaudit........................................................
Har medlemsstaterne fet retningslinjerne og metodebeskrivelserne stillet til rdighed i tide?................................................................ .. KOMMISSIONENS GENNEMGANG AF FORSLAGENE TIL EF-INITIATIV-PROGRAMMER .. Har forundersżgelsen bidraget til at hżjne kvaliteten af EF-initiativ-programmerne? . . .. 
THECOMMISSIONGUIDELINES ............................................... Do the guidelines contain an adequate definition of trans-European projects? . . . . . . . . .
Godkendte Kommissionen EF-initiativ-programmerne inden for de fastsatte frister? . . .. SAMARBEJDETOMFORBEREDELSENOGGENNEMFŻRELSEN ...................... 
Dotheguidelinesincludespecificimplementingrules? .......................... Do the guidelines include specific measurable objectives and targeted measures? . . . . . . Objectivesandindicators .............................................
Indgik der en hżringsproces i forberedelsen af EF-initiativ-programmerne? . . . . . . . . . . . 
Targetingofmeasures................................................
Var forhndsevalueringen en hjžlp ved udarbejdelsen af programmerne? . . . . . . . . .... 
Aretheeligibleareasclearlydefined? ........................................
C 303/2 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 7.12.2004 Var der blevet udfżrt samordnede analyser af forholdene i regionerne? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Erdeproblemer,dersigtestil,gržnserelaterede? ............................... 
Were the guidelines and methodology documents made available to the Member States at theappropriatetime? .................................................... THECOMMISSIONŐSPROCEDUREFOREXAMININGCIPPROPOSALS ................ DidexaminationhelptoenhanceCIPquality? .................................
Svarerprogrammernesprioritetertildeidentificeredebehov? ..................... 
CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE INITIAL ANALYSIS AND CHOICE OF MEASURES AND THE ADDEDVALUEOFTHEFIRSTPROJECTSTOBEADOPTED.........................
Er EF-initiativ-programmerne under Interreg III og EFRUŐs traditionelle interventioner komplementžre?........................................................ 
Is there complementarity between the Interreg III CIPs and traditional ERDF interven-tions?.................................................................
KONKLUSIONOGANBEFALINGER ............................................ 
Conclusion ............................................................
Retningslinjerne vedrżrer de operative procedurer, men de blev offentliggjort for sent,ogmleneidemerforgenerelle ................................... 
The guidelines focus on operational procedures but were made available too late and containover-generalisedobjectives......................................
Kommissionens undersżgelse af forslagene til EF-initiativ-programmer bżr forbed-res............................................................... 
TheprocedureforexaminingCIPproposalsmustbeimproved................ Preparation and the start of implementation are generally characterised by coopera-tion..............................................................
Analyserne var generelt samordnede, men ikke sžrlig nyttige; ingen sammenhžng mellem analyserne og definitionen af foranstaltningerne under programmerne og projekterne,somburdehavestżrremervžrdieffekt ......................... 
Analyses are generally integrated but of little use; no connection exists between analyses and the definition of programme measures; the added value of projects needstobeenhanced ................................................
De eksisterende redskaber er ikke egnede til mling af effekten af EF-initiativ-programmerneiforholdtilmlene...................................... 
The available tools are inadequate to the task of measuring the impact of CIPs in rela-tiontotheirobjectives ...............................................
En af strukturfondenes interventionsformer ved siden af operationelle programmer, faglig bistand og innovative aktioner. 
One form of Structural Fund intervention, alongside operational programmes, technical assistance and innovative actions.
Der findes fire EF-initiativer: Interreg, Urban, Leader og Equal. 
There are four CIs: Interreg, Urban, Leader and Equal.
Den Europžiske Fond for Regionaludvikling Europžisk żkonomisk firmagruppe. 
European Economic Interest Grouping.
2137/85 af 25. juli 1985 (EFT L 199 af 31.7.1985, s. 1). 
EEIGs are legal instruments established under Council Regulation (EEC) No 2137/85 of 25 July 1985 (OJ L 199, 31.7.1985, p.
Juridiske personer og fysiske personer hjemmehżrende i forskellige medlemsstater kan slutte sig sammen juridisk i en EŻFG. 
1) to permit legal entities and natural persons from different Member States to form legal groupings.
Myndighed eller organ, der er udpeget til at forvalte et interventionsprogram. 
An authority or body designated to manage an intervention programme.
Forvaltningsmyndigheden er ansvarlig for dels, at interventionerne forvaltes effektivt og korrekt, dels for deres gennemfżrelse (modtagelse, undersżgelse og evaluering af forslagene til foranstaltninger, indsamling af oplysninger, den rlige rapport, tilrettelžggelse af midtvejsevalueringen mv.). 
It is responsible, on the one hand, for the efficiency and correctness of management and, on the other hand, for implementation (receiving, examining and evaluating proposed operations, gathering data, drawing up the annual report, organising the mid-term evaluation, etc.).
Et af de tre prioriterede strukturfondsml. 
One of the three priority objectives of the Structural Funds.
Fremme af udviklingen og strukturtilpasningen i regioner med udviklingsefterslžb. 
It seeks to promote the development and structural adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind.
Normalt bidrager alle fondene til de programmer, som gennemfżres i disse regioner. 
As a rule, all the Funds contribute to programmes targeting these regions.
Stżtte til żkonomisk og social omstilling i omrder med strukturproblemer. 
It seeks to support the economic and social conversion of areas facing structural difficulties.
Inventionerne under dette ml finansieres udelukkende af Den Europžiske Fond for Regionaludvikling (EFRU) og Den Europžiske Socialfond (ESF). 
Only the ERDF and the European Social Fund (ESF) contribute under this objective.
SF Strukturfondene 
SFs Structural Funds
C 303/4 DA Styringsudvalg SWOT Tvžreuropžisk Den Europžiske Unions Tidende Udvalg, der varetager den fžlles udvžlgelse af tiltag og det samordnede tilsyn med gennemfżrelsen af dem. 
C 303/4 EN Steering committee SWOT Trans-European Official Journal of the European Union Committee responsible for the joint selection of projects and for the coordinated monitoring of project implementation.
Det er sammensat af repržsentanter for de forskellige lande. 
It is composed of representatives from each country.
Dets opgaver kan eventuelt varetages af overvgningsudvalget. 
Where appropriate, its duties may be discharged by the monitoring committee.
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (stžrke punkter, svage punkter, muligheder og farer). 
Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
SWOT-analysen er en metode til fastlžggelse af en strategi. 
SWOT analysis is a strategy definition tool.
Term, der anvendes som fžlles betegnelse for alle initiativets tre linjer: gržnseoverskridende samarbejde (linje A), tvžrnationalt samarbejde (linje B) og tvžrregionalt samarbejde (linje C). 7.12.2004 
Generic term used for the three strands of the Initiative: cross-border cooperation (Strand A), transnational cooperation (Strand B) and interregional cooperation (Strand C). 7.12.2004
7.12.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende RESUM I. EF-initiativet Interreg blev oprettet i 1990, fordi man havde konstateret, at gržnseregionerne var isolerede. 
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. The Interreg Community Initiative (CI) was launched in 1990 in an attempt to tackle the isolation of border areas.
Initiativet blev viderefżrt i perioden 1994-1999 (Interreg II) og i perioden 2000-2006 (Interreg III). 
It was renewed for the periods 1994 to 1999 (Interreg II) and 2000 to 2006 (Interreg III).
Med 4 875 millioner euro i forpligtelsesbevillinger er Interreg III det vigtigste EF-initiativ. 
With commitment appropriations of 4 875 million euro, Interreg III is the most substantial CI.
Rettens revision af Interreg III džkkede perioden, fra Kommissionen udarbejdede retningslinjerne, til den traf de fżrste beslutninger om at godkende stżttemodtagernes projekter. 
The CourtŐs audit of Interreg III covered the period from the preparation of the Commission guidelines to the first decisions to adopt beneficiariesŐ projects.
Retningslinjerne for Interreg III vedrżrer fżrst og fremmest bestemmelserne for gennemfżrelsen af programmerne, der skal styrke samarbejdet. 
The Interreg III guidelines focus on the procedures for implementing programmes that seek to enhance cooperation.
De blev imidlertid offentliggjort p et tidspunkt, hvor forberedelsen af forslagene til EF-initiativ-programmer var begyndt mindst et r tidligere. 
However, they were not made available until preparation of the CIP proposals had been under way for at least a year.
Der er ingen indikatorer, som de samlede fremskridt kan mles med. 
There are no indicators with which to assess how much overall progress has been made.
Vurderingskriterierne blev imidlertid ikke forberedt godt nok, og selv om der var konstateret nogle alvorlige svagheder i forslagene, var der ikke foretaget de nżdvendige forbedringer. 
However, the assessment criteria were under-prepared and insufficient improvements had been made in response to the significant shortcomings identified in the proposals.
Programmerne blev vedtaget efter fristens udlżb, hvilket gav et afbržk i samarbejdet mellem de stżtteberettigede regioner. Det bevirkede ogs, at de disponible bevillinger ikke blev udnyttet fuldt ud. 
The adoption of the programmes was delayed, with the result that the process of cooperation between eligible regions was interrupted and the available appropriations were under-utilised.
V. Programmerne blev som anbefalet i retningslinjerne forberedt inden for rammerne af en hżringspro-ces. 
V. As advocated by the guidelines, the programmes were prepared in the context of a consultation process.
Partnerne i de forskellige medlemsstater havde generelt gjort en indsats for, at forberedelsen skete i samarbejde. 
The partners from the various Member States generally contribute to implementation in a spirit of cooperation.
Der er imidlertid stadig hindringer i vejen for oprettelsen af strukturer, der virkelig er fžlles, til gennemfżrelse af EF-initiativ-programmerne, og for allokeringen af de finansielle midler fra EFRU. 
However, there remain some obstacles to setting up CIP implementation structures that are genuinely shared and to allocating the financial resources of the ERDF.
Der ligger nemlig andre hensyn, som ikke forklares i programmerne, til grund for prioriteterne og mlingerne. 
This is because the priorities and measures were established on the basis of other concerns which are not elucidated in the programmes.
Desuden tržffes der ikke valg med henblik p at lżse specifikke gržnserelaterede problemer, og analyserne bruges ikke, nr man skal beskrive regionens udgangssituation, som fremskridtene skal mles i forhold til. 
Neither were decisions made concerning the resolution of problems caused by the presence of a border, and the analyses do not help to fix the starting points in terms of which progress is to be measured.
De fżrste projekter, der blev godkendt, blev forberedt og vil blive gennemfżrt i samarbejde mellem de forskellige involverede partnere. 
The first projects to be adopted were prepared and will be implemented in the context of cooperation between the different partners concerned.
De bidrager imidlertid ikke i alle tilfžlde sžrlig meget til at lżse de gržnserelaterede problemer, for nogle projekter gr ikke ud p andet end erfaringsudveksling. 
However, because some projects are limited to the sharing of experience, they do not always contribute significantly to the resolution of problems specific to border areas.
Indikatorerne er ikke et tilstržkkeligt grundlag for den efterfżlgende evaluering af de fremskridt, der er gjort. 
The indicators are inadequate to the task of ex post evaluation of the progress made.
Med henblik p indevžrende periode anbefaler Retten, at de indikatorsystemer, der er fastsat for hvert enkelt EF-initiativ-program, forenkles og forbedres, s effekten af programmerne virkelig kan mles. 
For the current period, the Court recommends that the systems of indicators applied to each CIP be simplified and improved in order to give a more valid measure of impact.
Kriterierne for udvžlgelse af projekter bżr strammes op, s projekterne fr mere mervžrdieffekt, dvs. s de bidrager mere til lżsning af de gržnserelaterede problemer. 
The project selection criteria should be strengthened so as to enhance the added value of projects, i.e., the degree to which they contribute to the resolution of border-related problems.
C 303/6 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 7.12.2004 IX. 
C 303/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 IX.
Sfremt initiativet fornyes efter 2006, bżr Kommissionen ivžrksžtte en analyse for at f fastslet, hvilke gržnserelaterede problemer der stadig er. 
If the Initiative is renewed after 2006, the Commission should launch a study to ascertain which problems are caused by the existence of a border.
Derfor bżr der fastsžttes indikatorer for hver enkelt linje. 
Indicators therefore need to be defined for each strand.
Derefter bżr Kommissionen fastsžtte detaljerede kriterier for vurderingen af forslagene til EF-initiativ-programmer. Sdanne kriterier skulle gżre det muligt at fżre en proaktiv politik over for medlemsstaterne. 
Subsequently, setting detailed criteria for the CommissionŐs assessment of CIP proposals would make it possible to adopt a proactive approach towards the Member States.
De analyser, der skal foretages i forbindelse med hvert enkelt EF-initiativ-program, bżr tjene som grundlag for fastsžttelsen af de specifikke ml og for resultatmlingen. 
The analyses requested at the level of each CIP should be used to set specific objectives and measure progress at that level.
X. Retningslinjerne og metodebeskrivelserne bżr foreligge, fżr forberedelsen af EF-initiativ-programmerne starter, og svel den funktion, den myndighed har, der skal udfżre forhndsevalueringen, som indholdet af programtillžgget bżr pržciseres. 
X. The guidelines and methodology documents should be made available before work starts on preparing CIPs, and the ex ante assessorŐs role and the content of the programme complement need to be clarified.
Endelig bżr i samarbejdets interesse de finansielle midler til initiativet ikke mere fordeles p medlemsstaterne. Arbejdet med at f fastlagt juridiske instrumenter fżres ud i livet. INDLEDNING Baggrund 1. 
Finally, in order to encourage cooperation the financial resources allocated to the Initiative should no longer be assigned by Member State, and the work begun on legal cooperation instruments should be completed and the recommendations put into effect.
EF-initiativet Interreg blev oprettet i 1990, fordi man havde konstateret, at gržnseregionerne var isolerede. De nationale gržnser hindrer en afbalanceret udvikling og integration inden for det europžiske territorium, dels fordi de adskiller samfundene i gržnseregionerne żkonomisk, socialt og kulturelt og sledes hindrer en sammenhžngende forvaltning (1) af dem, dels fordi der er tendens til, at de nationale politikker ikke tager hensyn til gržnseregionerne, s de har fet perifer betydning i den nationale sammenhžng. 
The Interreg Community Initiative (CI) was launched in 1990 in an attempt to tackle the isolation of border areas. National frontiers are obstacles to the balanced development and integration of the European territory. Firstly, they separate border communities economically, socially and culturally, thereby hindering collaborative management (1).
Initiativet blev viderefżrt i perioden 1994-1999 (Interreg II) og i perioden 2000-2006 (Interreg III). 
The CI was renewed for the period 1994 to 1999 (Interreg II) and again for 2000 to 2006 (Interreg III).
Initiativet tager navnlig sigte p at fremme samarbejdet mellem regioner i forskellige medlemsstater og er dermed et centralt element i opbygningen af Europa. 2. 
It seeks in particular to promote cooperation between regions in different Member States and is therefore at the heart of European integration. 2.
Interreg nžvnes eksplicit i grundforordningen om strukturfondene (SF) (2). 
There is an explicit reference to Interreg in the basic instrument establishing the Structural Funds (SFs) (2).
Interreg gennemfżres p initiativ af Kommissionen, som vedtager retningslinjer, hvor ml, anvendelsesomrde og gennemfżrelsesbetingelser for det er beskrevet. 
It is carried out at the initiative of the Commission, which adopts guidelines defining its aims, scope and method of implementation.
Tabel 1 viser sammenhžngen mellem grundforordningen og hele forlżbet, indtil stżttemodtagerne gennemfżrer projekterne. 
The process linking the basic legislation to the end projects to be implemented by the beneficiaries of aid is shown in Table 1.
Til perioden 2000-2006 fik initiativet tildelt 4 875 millioner euro i forpligtelsesbevillinger af bevillingerne til interventioner under Den Europžiske Fond for Regionaludvikling (EFRU), den ene af de fire strukturfonde. 
For the period 2000 to 2006, out of a total of 10 432,5 million euro assigned to the four CIs (3), 4 875 million euro in commitment appropriations were allocated to Interreg III for interventions under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), one of the four SFs.
Tabel 2 er en oversigt over udnyttelsen siden periodens begyndelse af de disponible bevillinger. 
An overview of the utilisation of the available appropriations since the start of the period is given in Table 2.
Retten har allerede revideret EF-initiativet Interreg ved udgangen af dets fżrste gennemfżrelsesperiode (Interreg I) (4). 
The Court previously examined the Interreg CI at the end of its first implementation period (Interreg I) (4).