natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ikke desto mindre fremgr det klart af dokumenterne fra Stresa-konferencen, at Čdet rimeligeÇ skal defineres ved sammenligning med andre sektorer. 
Nevertheless, it is clear from the work at the Stresa Conference that ÔfairnessŐ is to be defined in comparison with other sectors.
(3) Hans-Broder Krohn, og Jacques van Lierde: Proposed Criteria for Fixing the Prices of Agricultural Products in the European Economic Community. International Journal of Agrarian Affairs, vol. 
(3) Hans-Broder Krohn and Jacques van Lierde, Proposed Criteria for Fixing the Prices of Agricultural Products in the European Economic Community, International Journal of Agrarian Affairs, Vol.
111 (1963), s. 
111 (1963), p.
246. 
246.
(4) EŻF-medlemsstaternes landbrugskonference fra 3. til 11. juli 1959, citeret efter Gottsmann: Der Gemeinsame Agrarmarkt. Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Loseblattsammlung, Stand 1.8.1998, I A 1, s. 2 ff. 
(4) Agriculture conference of the Member States of the European Economic Community from 3 to 11 July 1959, quoted from: Gottsmann, Der Gemeinsame Agrarmarkt, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft Baden-Baden, 5 Loseblattsammlung, Stand 1.8.1998, I A 1, p.
(5) P Messina-konferencen i 1955 nedsatte udenrigsministrene for EKSFŐs medlemsstater en arbejdsgruppe under forsžde af Paul-Henri Spaak, som fik til opgave at undersżge mulighederne for en dybere żkonomisk integration. 
2 ff. () At the Messina conference in 1955, the Foreign Ministers of the Member States of the ECSC set up a working party, chaired by Paul-Henri Spaak, to study the possibilities for increasing economic integration.
Spaak-rapporten (april 1956) indeholdt de fżrste udkast til fžllesskabstraktater om oprettelse af EŻF og Euratom. 
The Spaak Report (April 1956) contained the first drafts of the Community Treaties providing for the creation of the EEC and Euratom.
(7) European Economic Community Commission: Proposals for the Working-Out and Putting into Effect of the Common Agricultural Policy in Application of Article 43 of the Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community. Bruxelles, 30. juni 1960, VI/COM(60) 105, II/13 og 14. 
(7) European Economic Community Commission, Proposals for the Working-Out and Putting Into Effect of the Common Agricultural Policy in Application of Article 43 of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Brussels, 30 June 1960, VI/COM(60) 105, II/13 and 14.
(8) Berkeley Hill: Farm Incomes, Wealth and Agricultural Policy, 3. udgave. Hants, 2000, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, s. 
(8) Berkeley Hill, Farm incomes, wealth and agricultural policy, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 3rd edition, Hants 2000, p.
20.2.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 45/15 Udviklingen hen imod et bredere og mere komplekst begreb 58. 
20.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/15 The move towards a broader and more complex concept 58.
I grżnbogen om perspektiver (1985) undersżgte Kommissionen behovet for indkomststżtte til landbrugere med lav eller faldende indkomst. 
In the 1985 Perspectives Green Paper, the Commission examined the need for income support for farmers with low or falling incomes.
Den grundlžggende tanke bag denne sociale tilgang til spżrgsmlet var, at den strukturelle žndring p landbrugsomrdet skulle gennemfżres gradvist, og at landbrugerne skulle beskyttes mod den voldsomme effekt, en strukturomlžgning ville f, samtidig med at der blev lagt pres p dem for at f dem til at tilpasse deres bedrifter til markedets behov. 
The basic idea underlying the social approach was that structural change in agriculture should be gradually implemented in a way that would cushion farmers from the shock of structural adjustment, while still maintaining pressure on farmers to adapt their holdings to market needs.
Det vil sige, at s lžnge der ikke er noget indkomst-eller beskžftigelsesalter-nativ, skal indkomststżtteordningerne for landbrugere bidrage til at undg vanskelige sociale situationer (1). 
Thus, as long as no alternative income and employment solutions are available to farmers, any income aid scheme for farmers should help avoid social hardship (1).
Denne nye tilgang vakte ikke begejstring hos landbrugerne, som var mistroiske over for direkte indkomststżtte, som de betragtede som socialhjžlp, og som frygtede, at en sdan ordning ville forhindre dem i at udżve flere forskellige aktiviteter(2). 
This new approach was received by farmers with little enthusiasm. They distrusted direct income aid as ÔwelfareŐ and were afraid such income support would preclude them from having multiple activities (2).
Mac Sharry-reformen i 1992 nżjedes med delvist at erstatte prisstżtten med indkomststżtte til landbrugsproducenter (3). 
This is why, in 1992, the Mac Sharry reform limited itself to replacing price maintenance only partially by revenue support for agricultural producers (3).
Grundlžggende drejede det sig om tre foranstaltninger: nedsžttelse af produktionspriserne, kompensation for dette indkomsttab ved direkte betalinger til producenterne og begržnsning af produktionen, for eksempel ved udtagning af dyrkede arealer (4). 
This essentially involved three measures: a fall in production prices, compensation for this fall in income by direct payments to producers and measures to limit output, such as the set-aside of arable land (4).
Med Agenda 2000 tages der endnu et skridt fra prisstżtte hen imod indkomststżtte, idet interventionspriserne for korn, oksekżd og mžlkeprodukter nedsžttes, samtidig med at Čareal-stżttenÇ og dyrepržmierne forhżjes, og deres anvendelsesomrde udvides for at kompensere for eventuelle indkomsttab. 
Agenda 2000 shifts further away from price support to income support by lowering intervention prices for cereals, beef and dairy products, and by increasing the level and scope of ÔareaŐ aid and animal premiums in order to compensate for potential income losses.
To af de fem store ml for Agenda 2000-reformen af den fžlles landbrugspolitik vedrżrer landbrugernes indkomst: Reformen skal sikre landbrugsbefolkningen en rimelig levestandard og sikre stabilitet i landbrugsindkomsterne, og den skal skabe nye arbejdspladser eller supplerende kilder til beskžftigelse og indkomst i landdistrikterne for p den mde at bidrage til den żkonomiske samhżrighed i EU (5). 
Two of the five major objectives of the Agenda 2000 CAP reform refer to farmersŐ incomes: to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community and the stability of farm incomes; and to promote supplementary or alternative sources of employment and income in rural areas and thus contribute to economic cohesion within the EU (5).
(1) Kommissionen for De Europžiske Fžllesskaber: KOM(85) 333 endelig, s. 
(1) Commission of the European Communities, COM(85) 333 final, p.
(2) Nigel Robson: The Changing Role of Part Time Farming in the Structure of Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 
(2) Nigel Robson, The Changing Role of Part-Time Farming in the Structure of Agriculture, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.
XXXVIII, nr. 2, maj 1987, s. 
XXXVIII No 2, May 1987, p.
169. 
169.
(3) Meddelelse fra Kommissionen til Rdet Ń Den fžlles landbrugspolitiks udvikling og fremtid (KOM(91) 100 endelig udg., s. 
(3) Communication of the Commission to the Council Ń the development and future of the CAP Ń reflections paper of the Commission, COM(91) 100 final, p.
12). 
12.
(4) Meddelelse fra Kommissionen til Rdet Ń Den fžlles landbrugspolitiks udvikling og fremtid (KOM(91) 100 endelig udg., s. 13 og 14). 
(4) Commission of the European Communities, Communication of the Commission to the Council Ń the development and future of the CAP Ń reflections paper of the Commission, COM(91) 100 final, p.13andp.14.
(5) Kommissionen for De Europžiske Fžllesskaber: Forslag til Rdets forordning (EF) om reformen af den fžlles landbrugspolitik. Bruxelles, 18. marts 1998 (KOM(1998) 158 endelig (nr. 
(5) Commission of the European Communities, Proposals for Council Regulations (EC) concerning the reform of the common agricultural policy, Brussels, 18 March 1998, COM(1998) 158 final, p.
2.1)). 
5 (No 2.1).
I midtvejsrevisionen understregede Kommissionen, at de grundlžggende ml for den fžlles landbrugspolitik fortsat er at sikre landbrugsbefolkningen en rimelig levestandard og bidrage til at stabilisere landbrugsindkomsterne. 
In the mid-term review, the Commission emphasised that ensuring a fair standard of living for the agricultural community and contributing to the stability of farm incomes remained key objectives for the CAP.
I det samme dokument konstateres det, at forżgelsen af den gennemsnitlige bedriftsstżr-relse, bedrifternes specialisering i dyrkning af bestemte afgrżder og den geografiske koncentration af produktionen har bevirket, at metoderne inden for traditionel produktion og blandet landbrug er kommet under pres. 
In this same document, it was noted that the growth of the average farm size, the specialisation in certain crops and the concentration of production in certain regions had put pressure on traditional farming methods and mixed farming.
Det anfżres herefter, at mange af denne type bedrifter har brug for en mere mlrettet stżtte for bedre at kunne tilpasse sig til de muligheder, der ligger i mere bne markeder og forbrugernes efterspżrgsel efter kvalitetsprodukter. 
It also stated that many of these farms would need more targeted support to adapt to the opportunities offered by more open markets and consumer demand for quality products.
Kommissionen bemžrker desuden, at stżrstedelen af de direkte betalinger gr til et mindretal af landbrugere, og spżrgsmlet rejses, om fordelingen af den direkte stżtte er optimal (6). 
Moreover, the Commission observed that a minority of farmers benefit from most of the direct payments and questioned whether the distribution of direct support was optimal (6).
En sammenligning af programmerne viser klart, at kravene til oplysninger om landbrugsbefolkningens żkonomiske situation har žndret sig: I begyndelsen drejede det sig om at kompensere for indkomsttab ved hjžlp af direkte betalinger, men fra og med Agenda 2000 har Kommissionen ogs interesseret sig for ikke-landbrugsmžssige indkomstkilder. 
A comparison of the programmes clearly shows that the requirements as regards information on the financial situation of the agricultural community have changed: whereas, at the outset, it was a matter of compensating for the loss of income via direct payments, since Agenda 2000, the Commission has also been interested in non-agricultural sources of income.
Dokumentet om midtvejsrevision omhandler desuden indkomstfordelingen og spżrgsmlet om, hvorvidt modtage.rne af direkte betalinger befinder sig i en uholdbar situation. 
Moreover, the mid-term review document also deals with the distribution of incomes and the question of knowing whether the final beneficiaries of direct payments are in a precarious position.
Det er imidlertid kun muligt at besvare disse spżrgsml om andre indkomstkilder og indkomstfordelin-gen, hvis de forskellige bedrifters samlede disponible indkomst er kendt. 
However, these questions (concerning other sources of income and the distribution of incomes) can only be answered if the overall disposable income of the various holdings is known.
Kommissionen er ogs opmžrksom p de žndrede krav til oplysninger om landbrugsbefolkningens żkonomiske situation, navnlig hvad angr strukturpolitikken: ČDen integrerede udvikling i landdistrikterne fr stadig stżrre betydning inden for sektorpo-litikkerne, herunder landbrugspolitikken... 
The Commission is also aware of the changed demands as regards information on the farmersŐ financial situation, in particular for the structural policies: ÔThe integrated development of rural areas is becoming an ever greater concern of sectoral policy, including agricultural policy (...).
Dette medfżrer nye behov for viden, navnlig i form af disponible statistiske oplysnin-ger... 
This generates new needs in terms of statistical data, and particularly the availability of information (...).
Disse nye behov vedrżrer en mere detaljeret omrdeopde-ling af [oplysningerne]... 
These new requirements are for more detail in terms of the territorial breakdown of data.
Der er desuden behov for oplysninger om bedrifternes og husstandenes indkomst fra anden virksomhed end landbrugsvirksomhed, navnlig fra virksomhed, der supplerer landbrugsvirksomheden, og om landbrugernes tjenesteydelser til samfundetÇ (7). 
Moreover, these requirements also extend to information on the non-farming component of the income of holdings and families, particularly activities that supplement farming activity and the community services provided by farmersŐ (7).
(6) Kommissionen for De Europžiske Fžllesskaber: Meddelelse fra Kommissionen til Rdet og Europa-Parlamentet Ń Midtvejsrevision af den fžlles landbrugspolitik. Bruxelles, 10. juli 2002 (KOM(2002) 394, s. 
(6) Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Mid-Term Review of the Common Agricultural Policy, Brussels, 10 July 2002, COM(2002) 394, pp. 2, 7 ff.
(7) Anden beretning fra Kommissionen til Rdet og Europa-Parlamentet om gennemfżrelsen af Rdets beslutning 96/411/EF om forbedring af Fžllesskabets landbrugsstatistik, punkt 5.9, s. 
(7) Second Commission report to the European Parliament and the Council on the state of progress of the implementation of Council Decision 96/411/EC relating to the improvement of Community agricultural statistics, paragraph 5.9, p.
C 45/16 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 20.2.2004 Den foreslede fortolkning af begreberne i EF-traktatens artikel 33 64. 
C 45/16 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 Proposed interpretation of the concepts contained in Article 33 of the EC Treaty 64.
Som nžvnt har Det Europžiske Fžllesskab hidtil ikke fortolket den meget generelle mlsžtning Čen rimelig levestandardÇ og opdelt den i specifikke, pržcise og mlelige delml. 
In short, the European Community has hitherto failed to interpret the very generic objective of a Ôfair standard of livingŐ and subdivide it into specific, precise and measurable objectives.
Begrebet ČlandbrugsbefolkningenÇ er heller ikke blevet defineret (1). 
Moreover, there is also no definition of the Ôagricultural communityŐ concept either (1).
P baggrund af de Čvžsentlige begivenhederÇ i udviklingen af den fžlles landbrugspolitik er det ikke desto mindre muligt at aflžse, hvilke aspekter ved landbrugsbefolkningens levestandard Det Europžiske Fžllesskab interesserer sig for, herunder navnlig tilstedevžrelsen og omfanget af ikke-landbrugsmžssige indkomster samt landbrugshusholdningernes indkomstfordeling. 
However, the Ômajor stagesŐ in the development of the CAP can provide us with information regarding the aspects of the standard of living of the agricultural community that interest the European Community, i.e., in particular, the existence and scale of non-agricultural earnings and the distribution of incomes.
Da der ikke findes en klar definition af begreberne ČlandbrugsbefolkningenÇ og Čen rimelig levestandardÇ, har Retten anmodet en ekspert (2) om at klarlžgge betydningen af disse begreber, som er meget vžsentlige for vurderingen af Kommissionens statistiske redskaber. 
In the absence of a clear definition of the concepts of Ôagricultural communityŐ and Ôfair standard of livingŐ, the Court commissioned an expert (2) with a view to clarifying the meaning of these concepts, which are important for an evaluation of the CommissionŐs statistical tools.
I bilaget gives et resum af ekspertens resultater. 
The results of the expertŐs appraisal are summarised in the Annex.
Fortolkningen af artikel 33 og dens indvirkning p Kommissionens statistiske redskaber 66. 
Impact of the interpretation of Article 33 on the CommissionŐs statistical tools 66.
For at kunne tage stilling til, om landbrugsindkomsterne er rimelige, skal Kommissionen have relevante oplysninger om de enkelte landbrugshusholdningers samlede disponible indkomst og om sammenlignelige virksomhedslederes husstandsindkomst. 
In order to give an opinion on the question of the fairness of agricultural incomes, the Commission must therefore have relevant information on the overall disposable income of individual agricultural households and the households of comparable entrepreneurs.
Kommissionen er ogs nżdt til at have disse oplysninger for at kunne undersżge landbrugernes andre indkomstkilder og indkomstfordelingen i landbrugssektoren. 
It also needs this information to be able to study the other sources of farmersŐ incomes or the distribution of incomes within the farming sector.
(1) Hill, op. cit., s. 
(1) Hill, loc.cit. p.
(2) Professor Stephan von Cramon, Gttingen Universitet. 
(2) Professor Stephan von Cramon of the University of Gttingen.
Vurdering af relevansen af Fžllesskabets statistiske redskaber 67. 
Evaluation of the pertinence of the CommunityŐs statistical tools 67.
Retten undersżgte de statistiske redskaber, der anvendes af Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne, navnlig for at kontrollere, om redskaberne gżr det muligt at konkludere, om landbrugsbefolkningens levestandard er rimelig. 
The Court examined the statistical tools applied by the Commission and in the Member States in order to verify, in particular, whether these tools allow conclusions to be drawn in respect of the fairness of the standard of living of the agricultural community.
Informationsnettet for landżkonomisk bogfżring (INLB) 68. 
The Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) 68.
Den stżrste fordel ved INLB er den harmoniserede mikrożkonomiske database. 
The FADNŐs strength lies in its microeconomic database.
Bedrifterne er inddelt efter stżrrelse, region og aktivitet i overensstemmelse med den europžiske klassifika-tion, s det ogs er muligt at foretage en differentieret analyse. 
As agricultural holdings are classified, under the European typology, according to their size, region and activity, a differentiated analysis is also possible.
Det omfattende program for kontrol af bedriftsskemaer, som har kunnet fs p internettet siden 2002 (dataene for regnskabsret 2000), og som sikrer nżje datakontrol, er et andet positivt element. 
The extensive farm returns control programme, which has been accessible on the Internet since 2002 (data for the financial year 2000) and guarantees a precise control over the data, is another positive aspect.
INLB er imidlertid baseret p bedrifterne og ikke p de enkelte husholdninger. 
The FADN is based, however, on holdings and not on households.
Der tages derfor kun hżjde for landbrugerens indkomst og ikke for de andre husstandsmedlemmers eller andre personers indkomster. 
The incomes of the members of the agricultural household other than the farmer and the incomes of other persons are therefore not taken into account.
Desuden registreres der kun indkomster fra landbrugsvirksomhed i INLB. 
Moreover, only income from agricultural activities is entered in the FADN accounts.
Der ses helt bort fra andre indkomstkilder. 
Other sources of income are ignored completely.
Figur 4 viser, at i 12 af de 15 medlemstater repržsenterer indkomsten fra den egentlige landbrugsaktivitet mindst halvdelen af den samlede indkomst for landbrugshusholdningerne taget i den snžvre betydning. 
Figure 4 shows that, in 12 Member States out of 15, income generated by agricultural activity as such accounts for at least half the total income of agricultural households in the narrow sense of the term.
Men i ni medlemsstater fr landbrugshusholdningerne kun mellem 25 og 60 % af deres indkomst fra landbrugsaktiviteter. 
However, in nine Member States agricultural households only draw between 25 % and 60 % of their income from agricultural activity.
De disponible data angiver, at andelen er endnu mindre, hvis landbrugshusholdningerne tages i den brede betydning. 
The data available indicate that the percentage is very much lower if the population of agricultural households in the broad sense of the term is taken.
20.2.2004 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende Figur 4 Landbrugsindkomstens andel i % af landbrugshusholdningernes samlede indkomst C 45/17 Kilde til den snžvre definition: Eurostat, Revenu du secteur des mnages agricoles Ń Rapport 2001, Luxembourg 2002. 
20.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union Figure 4 Farm income as a percentage of total income of farm households C 45/17 Source of narrow definition: Eurostat, Income of the agricultural households sector - 2001 Report, Luxembourg 2002.
Tallene for Sverige, Spanien og Portugal omfatter bde indkomsten fra selvstžndig landbrugsmžssig aktivitet og ikke-landbrugsmžssig aktivitet. 
The figures for Sweden, Spain and Portugal include income from independent agricultural and non-agricultural activities.
Kilde til den brede definition: Organisationen for Żkonomisk Samarbejde og Udvikling, arbejdsgruppe vedrżrende landbrugspolitik og landbrugsmarkeder: Rapport de synthse sur les questions de revenu des mnages agricoles dans les pays de lŐOCDE (AGR/CA/ API(2002)11/Final) af 29. oktober 2002, s. 
Source of broad definition: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Working Party on Agricultural Policies and Markets: Synthesis report on farm household income issues in OECD countries (AGR/CA/API(2002)11/Final), 29.10.2002, p.
For at skelne mellem landbrugshusholdninger og andre husholdninger anvender OECD Eurostats definitioner: I snžver betydning er en landbrugshusholdning en husholdning, hvor referencepersonen Ń normalt familieforsżrgeren Ń fr hovedparten af sin indkomst fra landbrug. 
In order to distinguish between agricultural households and other households, the OECD uses the definitions adopted by Eurostat: in the narrow sense of the term, an agricultural household is a household where agriculture is the main source of income of the reference person Ń as a general rule, the head of the household.
I bred betydning derimod betragtes alle husholdninger, hvor mindst et medlem har en vis indkomst fra selvstžndig landbrugsaktivitet, som landbrugshusholdninger (Commission europenne, ČRevenu du secteur des mnages agricolesÇ, rapport 1999, Luxembourg, s. 
In the broad sense of the term, on the other hand, all households are considered to be agricultural households where at least one member draws some income from an independent agricultural activity (European Commission, ÔIncome of the Agricultural Households SectorŐ, 1999 report, Luxembourg, p.
Det betyder i praksis, at INLB kun džkker 65 % af alle landbrugere i Fžllesskabet. 
In practice, this means that the FADN only covers 65 % of all farmers in the Community.
Fordi minimumstžrsklen for bedrifternes żkonomiske stżrrelse ikke altid er den samme, varierer denne procentdel betydeligt fra medlemsstat til medlemsstat: I Żstrig omfatter INLB kun 41,9 % af landbrugerne, mens džk-ningsgraden i Irland er 87,9 % (1). 
As the economic size threshold for the holdings is not always the same, this rate varies considerably from one Member State to another: while the FADN only covers 41,9 % of Austrian farmers, the rate covered in Ireland comes to 87,9 % (1).
(1) http: //europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/rica/methodology2_en.cfm. 
(1) http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/rica/methodology2_en.cfm.
Under revisionen, som blev gennemfżrt i en ržkke medlemsstater, blev det konstateret, at mens bedriftsskemaerne i hżj grad er harmoniserede, er der forskelle mellem medlemsstaterne, for s vidt angr fastlžggelsen af populationens stżrrelse, procedurerne for udtagelse af en repržsentativ stikprżve og udvžlgelsen af nye bedrifter, og det begržnser mulighederne for at foretage sammenligninger. 
As the audit, which was carried out in a number of Member States, revealed, in contrast to the high degree of standardisation displayed by the farm returns, discrepancies still exist between the Member States with regard to population size, the procedures for selecting representative samples and the selection of new holdings for inclusion. This limits opportunities for drawing comparisons.
Generelt kan det siges, at INLB giver et plideligt billede af den disponible indkomst for landbrugere, der bor alene og ikke har andre indkomstkilder end landbrug. 
In general, it can therefore be said that the FADN gives a largely reliable picture of the disposable incomes of individual farmers living alone and with no other income other than