natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Men hvis Kommissionen ikke kan bevise, at koncentrationen af udbuddet i producentorganisationer har givet virkelige fordele, bżr den tage denne mekanisme til stżtte af producenterne af frugt og grżntsager i EU op til fornyet overvejelse. 
If, on the other hand, the Commission cannot demonstrate that the concentration of supply in producer organisations delivers real benefits, it should reconsider this mechanism for supporting the EUŐs fruit and vegetable growers. C 282/33
C 282/34 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 20.11.2006 INDLEDNING Formlet med stżtteordningen: at producenterne kan tilpasse sig en ny markedssituation 1. 
C 282/34 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 INTRODUCTION Objective of the aid scheme: adapting to the changing market situation 1.
Da situationen p markedet for frugt og grżntsager žndrede sig i 1990Őerne, og der blev stillet krav om andre produkter og om stżrre garantier for kvalitet og striksere miljżnor-mer, indfżrte EU en ny ordning for at stżtte producenterne, s de kunne tilpasse sig denne situation. 
Faced in the 1990s with a changing market for fruit and vegetables, requiring different products and increased guarantees of quality and environmental standards, the EU introduced a new aid scheme to support growers in adapting to this demand.
Denne stżtte til Čdriftspro-grammerÇ beskrives nedenfor. 
This was the aid for Ôoperational programmesŐ, which is described below.
Samtidig blev der skret ned p stżtten til tilbagekżb (1), som man havde ydet i mange r, og dermed gav man producenterne i EU et yderligere incitament til at producere det, som markedet żnskede. 2. 
At the same time, cuts were made in the long-standing aid for withdrawals (1), providing a further incentive for the EUŐs growers to produce what the market wanted. 2.
Markedssituationen forandrede sig ogs med stigende indflydelse fra f, men store koncerner inden for detailhandel og distribution. 
The market situation was also changing with the increasing dominance of a few large retail and distribution groups.
EU reagerede ved at styrke den politik, man havde fulgt siden 1960Őerne, og opmuntrede til dannelse af sammenslutninger af producenter kendt som ČproducentorganisationerÇ for at opn stordriftsbesparelser og en stżrre markedstilstedevžrelse. 
In response, the EU strengthened the policy followed since the 1960s encouraging the formation of groups of growers known as Ôproducer organisationsŐ with a view to obtaining economies of scale and a stronger market presence.
Denne koncentration af udbuddet blev fremmet ved, at medlemskab af en producentorganisation blev gjort til en forudsžtning for, at producenterne kunne modtage den nye stżtte til driftsprogrammer. 
This grouping of supply (or ÔconcentrationŐ) was encouraged by making membership of a producer organisation a condition for receiving the new aid for operational programmes.
Frugt-og grżntsagsproducenter, der ikke var medlem af en producentorganisation, var ikke berettigede til at modtage denne EU-stżtte. 
Fruit and vegetable growers not in producer organisations were not eligible for the EU aid.
Producenterne blev sledes opmuntret til at danne eller blive medlem af producentorganisationer. 
This created an incentive for growers to form or join producer organisations.
Samtidig strammede EU op p de betingelser, som producentorganisationerne skulle opfylde for at sikre, at de ville kunne koncentrere udbuddet effektivt. 
At the same time, the EU set stricter conditions to be met by the producer organisations to ensure that they would be effective in concentrating the supply.
Retten gjorde rede for resultaterne af sin foregende revision af stżtten til frugt-og grżntsagssektoren i rsberetningen for 2000 (2). 
The Court reported the results of its previous audit of the aids for the fruit and vegetable sector in the Annual Report for 2000 (2).
P det tidspunkt var kun f driftsprogrammer blevet afsluttet, s det var ikke klart, om stżtten ville vžre effektiv p lžngere sigt. 
At that time, few operational programmes had been completed, so the longer-term effectiveness of the aid was not apparent.
Men i beretningen blev der peget p svagheder i medlemsstaternes forvaltning af ordningen, hvilket havde gjort stżtten mindre effektiv. 
However, the report identified weaknesses in the Member StatesŐ management of the scheme, which had reduced the effectiveness of the aid.
Derfor blev mlet for denne revision at vurdere effektiviteten af ordningen med stżtte til driftsprogrammer. 
In the light of this, the objective set for this audit was to assess the effectiveness of the aid scheme for operational programmes.
Effektivitet defineres i EUŐs finansforordning (3) p fżlgende mde: ČPrincippet om effektivitet drejer sig om at n de opstillede specifikke ml og de forventede resultaterÇ. 
Effectiveness is defined in the EUŐs Financial Regulation (3) as Ôattaining the specific objectives set and achieving the intended resultsŐ.
Da de fastsatte ml for ordningen med stżtte til driftsprogrammer hverken er klare eller kvantificerede, skal Čdet at vžre effektivÇ i denne revision forsts som, at stżtten bidrager til opfyldelsen af disse ml. 6. Ved revisionen sżgte vi at besvare fżlgende spżrgsml: i) Er stżtteordningen blevet gennemfżrt p en sdan mde, at det sikres, at driftsprogrammerne sandsynligvis vil vžre effektive? ii) Har de foranstaltninger, der er finansieret i driftsprogrammerne, vžret effektive? iii) Har producentorganisationerne gjort fremskridt med hensyn til at opfylde de ml, der er fastsat for stżtteordningen? 
As the objectives set for the operational programme aid scheme are not definite or quantified, in this audit, effectiveness is considered as making progress towards those objectives. 6. (i) (ii) (iii) 7. (i) (ii) (iii) The questions set for this audit were: Has the aid scheme been implemented in a way to ensure that operational programmes are likely to be effective?
Revisionen bestod i: i) en vurdering af de procedurer, Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne har etableret til at gennemfżre politikken ii) en test af effektiviteten af en stikprżve af aktioner i driftsprogrammerne og iii) en undersżgelse af en stikprżve af producentorganisationer og af Kommissionens data p EU-niveau med henblik p at finde beviser for, at producentorganisationerne har gjort fremskridt med hensyn til at opfylde politikmlene. 
Have the measures financed in operational programmes been effective? Haveproducerorganisationsmadeprogresstowardsachiev-ing the objectives set for the aid scheme? The audit approach consisted of: assessing the procedures established by the Commission and the Member States for implementing the policy; testing the effectiveness of a sample of operational programme actions; and examiningasampleofproducerorganisations,andCommis-sion data at EU level, for evidence of progress made by producer organisations towards the policy objectives.
Revisionen p stedet blev gennemfżrt i 2005 og var baseret p en tilfžldigt udvalgt stikprżve p 30 driftsprogrammer, der blev afsluttet i 2003 og 2004, i otte medlemsstater: Gržkenland, Spanien, Frankrig, Irland, Italien, Nederlandene, Portugal og Det Forenede Kongerige. 
8. random sample of 30 operational programmes completed in 2003 and 2004 in eight Member States: Greece, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, and the United Kingdom.
Der var ikke medtaget producentorganisationer fra de nye medlemsstater, da disse ikke havde afsluttede driftsprogrammer, da revisionen fandt sted. 
Producer organisations in the new Member States were not included as they had not completed operational programmes at the time of the audit.
(2) Revisionsrettens rsberetning for regnskabsret 2000 (EFT C 359 af 15.12.2001). 
(2) Court of Auditors Ń Annual Report concerning the financial year 2000 (OJ C 359, 15.12.2001).
1605/2002 af 25. juni 2002 (EFT L 248 af 16.9.2002, s.1). 
(3) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1).
(1) Producenter, der ČtržkkerÇ overskydende frugt og grżntsager ČtilbageÇ fra markedet for at stżtte priserne (normalt ved at destruere produk-terne), fr udbetalt en godtgżrelse over EU-budgettet. 
The audit fieldwork was undertaken in 2005, based on a (1) Growers who ÔwithdrawŐ surplus fruit and vegetables from the market to support prices (usually by destroying the produce) are paid compensation from the EU budget.
20.11.2006 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende C 282/35 Producentorganisationerne 9. 
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/35 Producer organisations 9.
En producentorganisation er en sammenslutning af producenter, der optržder sammen for at styrke deres markedsposi-tion. 
A producer organisation is a group of growers who act together to strengthen their position in the market.
Mange producentorganisationer er kooperativer, men det kan ogs vžre grupper af enkeltpersoner eller virksomheder. 
Many are cooperatives, but they can be groups of individuals or groups of companies.
I henhold til EU-forordningerne (1) skal en producentorganisation mindst have fem medlemmer og en omsžtning p 100 000 euro. 
The conditions to be met, set out in the EU regulations (1), are to have at least five members and a minimum turnover of 100 000 euro.
Producentorganisationerne stiller de faciliteter til rdighed, som er nżdvendige til oplagring, emballering og afsžtning af deres medlemmers produkter. 
Producer organisations have to provide the means for storing, packaging and marketing their membersŐ produce.
De skal kunne planlžgge og tilpasse deres produktion og fremme miljżvenlige dyrkningsformer og affaldshndteringer. 
They have to be able to plan and adapt their production, and promote environmentally sound cultivation and waste-management practices.
Nye producentorganisationer kan modtage startstżtte i en femrsperiode, sledes at de kan etablere sig og kżbe de faciliteter, de har brug for for at opfylde betingelserne i forordningen. 
A start-up aid is available over a five-year period for new producer organisations to set up and acquire the facilities they need to meet the EUŐs conditions.
Nr producentorganisationerne er etableret, kontrollerer medlemsstaterne, at de fortsat opfylder disse betingelser, selv om der ikke kan ydes yderligere stżtte til dette forml. 
Once established, Member States check that producer organisations continue to meet these conditions, although no further aid is available for this.
I princippet yder EU ikke stżtte til producentorganisationernes administrations-, drifts-og produktionsomkostninger (2). 
In principle, the EU does not support producer organisationsŐ administrative, operating or production costs (2).
Der er ca. 1 500 producentorganisationer i de 14 medlemsstater (3) (diagram 1). 
There are some 1 500 producer organisations in the 14 Member States (3) (Diagram 1).
Der er stor forskel p producentorganisationernes stżrrelse og art (diagram 2). 
There is a great diversity in the sizes and nature of producer organisations (Diagram 2).
Som led i revisionen besżgte Retten figenproducenter i Gržkenland, svampeproducen-ter i Irland, et citrusfrugtkooperativ i Portugal og tomatproducen-ter i Spanien og Nederlandene. 
In the course of this audit, the Court visited fig growers in Greece and mushroom growers in Ireland, a citrus fruit cooperative in Portugal and tomato growers from Spain to the Netherlands.
Nogle organisationer havde under 10 medlemmer, en organisation i Italien, der var specialiseret i žbler, havde 5 800 medlemmer. n producentorganisation bestod af 14 virksomheder, der hver isžr havde en omsžtning p 2,6 millioner euro i gennemsnit, en anden organisation var et kooperativ med 800 deltidsproducenter, der i gennemsnit kun producerede for 600 euro hver. 
Some had fewer than 10 members, one in Italy specialising in apples had 5 800 members. One producer organisation was made up of 14 companies, each with turnover averaging 2,6 million euro, another was a cooperative of 800 part-time growers averaging just 600 euro of produce each.
I 2003 havde en producentorganisation i EU i gennemsnit en omsžtning p 9 millioner euro og over 300 medlemmer. 
The average EU producer organisation in 2003 had a turnover of 9 million euro and over 300 members.
Frugt og grżntsager er den stżrste landbrugssektor i EU-15 mlt i produktionsvžrdi. 
Fruit and vegetables is the largest agricultural sector by value of output in the EU-15.
Den er sžrlig vigtig for landbrug-sżkonomien i Gržkenland, Spanien, Italien og Portugal, hvor sektoren udgżr over 25 % af landbrugsproduktionens vžrdi. 
It is particularly important to the agricultural economies of Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal, where the sector represents over 25 % of the value of agricultural output.
Spanien, Frankrig og Italien str tilsammen for 70 % af vžrdien af EUŐs produktion af frugt og grżntsager. 
Spain, France and Italy together account for 70 % of EU fruit and vegetable production by value.
Omkring en tredjedel af deres produktion blev afsat af producentorganisationer i 2004. 
About a third of their production was marketed by producer organisations in 2004.
I Nederlandene, Belgien og Irland var den andel af frugt-og grżnt-sagsproduktionen, der blev afsat af producentorganisationer, meget hżjere, nemlig omkring 80 %, mens den i Gržkenland var 13 % og i Portugal 6 % (diagram 3). 
In the Netherlands, Belgium and Ireland, the proportion of fruit and vegetable output marketed by producer organisations was much higher, at around 80 %, whereas in Greece it was 13 % and in Portugal 6 % (Diagram 3).
2200/96 af 28. oktober 1996 om den fžlles markedsordning for frugt og grżntsager (EFT L 297 af 21.11.1996, s. 1) og Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p.
1432/2003 af 11. august 2003 om gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser til Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 2200/96 for s vidt angr anerkendelse af producentorganisationer og forelżbig anerkendelse af producentsammenslutninger (EUT L 203 af 12.8.2003, s. 
1). and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1432/2003 of 11 August 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 regarding the conditions for recognition of producer organisations and preliminary recognition of producer groups (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p.
(2) Nogle undtagelser er tilladt i producentorganisationernes driftsprogrammer, jf. punkt 42. 
(2) Some exceptions are allowed in producer organisationsŐ operational programmes. See paragraph 42.
(3) Luxembourg har ingen producentorganisationer. 
(3) Luxembourg has no producer organisations.
Diagram 1 Antal producentorganisationer i 2004 Diagram 2 Den afsatte produktions gennemsnitlige vžrdi pr. producentorganisation i 2004 (millioner euro) Stżtten til driftsprogrammer 13. 
Diagram 1 Number of producer organisations in 2004 Diagram 2 Average value of marketed production per producer organisation 2004 (Mio EUR) The aid for operational programmes 13.
De producentorganisationer, der opfylder betingelserne i punkt 9, kan ansżge om stżtte til et ČdriftsprogramÇ. 
Producer organisations that meet the conditions in paragraph 9 can apply for aid for an Ôoperational programmeŐ.
Det bestr af foranstaltninger, som producentorganisationen tržffer for at tilpasse sine medlemmers produktion til efterspżrgslen og for at styrke deres stilling p markedet (tekstboks 3). 
This is a programme of measures that a producer organisation undertakes to adapt its membersŐ production to market demand and strengthen its position in the marketplace (Text box 3).
De specifikke ml, som skal opfyldes ved hjžlp af foranstaltningerne, er fastsat i 
The specific objectives that the measures should aim to achieve are set in
C 282/36 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 20.11.2006 Diagram 3 Rdets forordning (1) (tekstboks 4). 
C 282/36 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 Diagram 3 the Council regulation (1) (Text box 4).
Programmet udformes af producentorganisationen og godkendes af medlemsstaten, der hvert r udbetaler EU-stżtten, som udgżr 50 % af de udgifter, som producentorganisationen har haft til at gennemfżre programmet. 
The programme is drawn up by the producer organisation and approved by the Member State, which pays EU aid annually of 50 % of the costs incurred by the producer organisation in implementing the programme.
Et driftsprogram lżber over tre til fem r, og ved periodens afslutning kan producentorganisationen ansżge om et nyt program. 
The duration of an operational programme is between three and five years, and at the end of the period a producer organisation may apply for a new programme.
Der er et rligt loft over stżtten, som er fastsat til 4,1 % af producentorganisationens omsžtning. 
There is an annual ceiling on the aid, set at 4,1 % of the producer organisationŐs turnover.
Over 70 % af producentorganisationerne har et driftsprogram, og stżtten belżb sig til 500 millioner euro i 2004. 
Over 70 % of producer organisations have an operational programme and the aid amounted to 500 million euro in 2004.
Det svarede til 3 % af producentorganisationernes omsžtning og ca. 1 % af den samlede vžrdi af EUŐs frugt-og grżntsagsproduktion. 
This represented 3 % of producer organisationsŐ turnover and approximately 1 % of the total value of EU fruit and vegetable output.
Udbetalingen af stżtten er steget vžsentligt, siden den blev indfżrt i 1997, samtidig med at stżtten til tilbagekżb af overskudsproduktion er reduceret (diagram 4). 
Take-up of the aid has increased greatly since it was introduced in 1997, at the same time as the aid for the withdrawal of surplus production has decreased (Diagram 4).
Diagrammet viser ogs den stżtte, der er betalt gennem producentorganisationerne til producenter af tomater og frugt til forarbejdning, og som er baseret p produktionsmžngden. 
The diagram also shows the aid paid through producer organisations to growers of tomatoes and fruit for processing, which is based on the volume of production.
Tekstboks 3 Typisk indhold af et driftsprogram Ń kżb af sorterings-og emballeringsmaskiner Ń ansžttelse af personale til kvalitetskontrol og markedsfżring Ń investeringer i vandingsanlžg og drivhuse Ń stżtte til producenter til genplantning af frugttržer Ń omkostninger ved naturlig bekžmpelse af skadedyr og sygdomme (1) Forordning (EF) nr. 2200/96. 
Text box 3 Typical contents of an operational programme Ń purchase of sorting and packing machinery Ń employment of quality control staff and marketing staff Ń investments in irrigation facilities and greenhouses Ń subsidies to growers for replanting fruit trees Ń costs of natural pest and disease control approaches (1) Regulation (EC) No 2200/96.
Tekstboks 4 Driftsprogrammerne har 11 ml Ń at sikre planlžgning af produktionen og tilpasning til efterspżrgslen, navnlig hvad angr mžngde og kvalitet Ń at fremme koncentrationen af udbuddet og markedsfżringen af medlemmernes produktion Ń at reducere produktionsomkostningerne Ń at regulere produktionspriserne Ń at fremme dyrkningsformer, produktionsmetoder og affalds-hndteringer, der er miljżvenlige Ń at forbedre produkternes kvalitet Ń at żge produkternes handelsvžrdi Ń at ivžrksžtte salgsfremmende foranstaltninger over for forbrugerne Ń at etablere driftsgrene med żkologiske produkter Ń at fremme integreret produktion eller andre miljżvenlige produktionsmetoder Ń at nedbringe tilbagekżbene. 15. 
Text box 4 The 11 operational programme objectives Ń ensuring that production is planned and adjusted to demand, particularly in terms of quality and quantity Ń promoting the concentration of supply and the placing on the market of the products produced by its members Ń reducing production costs and Ń stabilising producer prices Ń promoting the use of environmentally-sound cultivation practices, production techniques and waste-management practices Ń improvement of product quality Ń boosting productsŐ commercial value Ń promotion of the products targeted at consumers Ń creation of organic product lines Ń the promotion of integrated production or other methods of production respecting the environment Ń the reduction of withdrawals 15.
Stżtteordningen gennemfżres normalt med delt forvaltning, hvor medlemsstaterne fżlger detaljerede regler, som Kommissionen har fastsat inden for rammerne af Rdets forordning. 
Implementation of the aid scheme is on the usual shared management basis whereby Member States follow detailed rules, set by the Commission, within the framework of the Council Regulation.
De skal samarbejde med Kommissionen for at sikre, at stżtten ydes i overensstemmelse med princippet om forsvarlig żkonomisk forvaltning: sparsommelighed, produktivitet og effektivitet. 
They are required to cooperate with the Commission to ensure that the aid is granted according to the principles of sound financial management: economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
Vžrdien af den afsatte produktion i 2004 
Value of marketed production in 2004
411/1997 af 3. marts 1997 (EFT L 62 af 4.3.1997, s. 
(1) CommissionRegulation(EC)No411/1997of3March1997(OJL62, 4.3.1997, p.
9), der er blevet erstattet af Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1433/2003 af 11. august 2003 om gennemfżrelsesbestemmelser til Rdets forordning (EF) nr. 
9), replaced by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1433/2003 of 11 August 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards operational funds, operational programmes and financial assistance (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p.
Det er dog et krav, at programmerne skal vžre rettet mod flere af de ml, der er anfżrt i Rdets forordning (jf. tekstboks 4). 
Producer organisations have the freedom to propose operational programme measures that suit their particular situation, with the proviso that the programmes must target ÔseveralŐ of the objectives set out in the Council regulation (see Text Box 4).
Som afslutning p feedbackkredslżbet skal producentorganisationerne rapportere til medlemsstaten ved afslutningen af programmet og gżre rede for, i hvilken udstržkning de har net deres ml, og for de erfaringer, de har indhżstet, og som vil kunne bruges i forbindelse med det nžste program. 
To complete the feedback circuit, producer organisations are required to report to the Member State at the end of the programme on the extent to which they have achieved their objectives, and the lessons to be learnt for their next programme.
Denne ČprogrammeringsmodelÇ, som producentorganisationerne skal fżlge, er illustreret i diagram 5. 
This Ôprogramming modelŐ to be followed by producer organisations is illustrated in Diagram 5.
C 282/38 DA Den Europžiske Unions Tidende 20.11.2006 Ń kontrollere, at det foreslede driftsprogram hžnger sammen żkonomisk og har den fornżdne tekniske kvalitet, og at overslagene er fornuftige. 
C 282/38 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 Ń verify the economic consistency and technical quality of the proposed operational programme, and the soundness of the estimates.
Forordningen fastsžtter, at medlemsstaterne derefter skal godkende programmet, kržve, at det žndres, eller afvise det. 
The regulation provided that the Member States should then approve the programme, require changes, or reject it.
DEL I: DRIFTSPROGRAMMERNES EFFEKTIVITET 19. 
PART I: EFFECTIVENESS OF OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES 19.
Som beskrevet ovenfor deler medlemsstaterne og Kommissionen ansvaret for at sikre, at stżtteordningen er effektiv, dvs. at stżtten bidrager til at opfylde de 11 ml, som Rdet har fastsat for driftsprogrammerne. 
As described above, Member States and the Commission share the responsibility to ensure that the aid scheme is effective: that the aid is used to achieve progress towards the 11 objectives the Council set for operational programmes.
I denne del af beretningen undersżges det, om Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne har gennemfżrt stżtteordningen p en sdan mde, at man fremmede effektivitet, og navnlig, om den programmeringsmodel, der er beskrevet ovenfor, fungerede efter hensigten. 
This part of the report first looks at whether the aid scheme was implemented by the Commission and Member States in a way to encourage effectiveness, and in particular, if the Ôprogramming modelŐ operated as intended.