natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Retten fandt nemlig, at ikke-integrerede fabrikanter som Schneider og Legrand var udsat for direkte priskonkurrence fra integrerede fabrikanter, når de bød på store anlægsprojekter.
The Court considered that the prices of non-integrated manufacturers such as Schneider and Legrand were subject to direct competitive pressure from integrated manufacturers when it came to carrying out large construction projects following an invitation to tender.
Retten fandt også, at det klart fremgik af den indklagede beslutning, at den oprindelige aftale og den nye aftale udgjorde én og samme støttetildeling, indført og iværksat i 1992 i forbindelse med indgåelsen af den oprindelige aftale uden forudgående anmeldelse til Kommissionen.
It found it also apparent from the contested decision that the original agreement and the new agreement constituted a single grant of aid, instituted and implemented in 1992 in the context of the original agreement's conclusion without prior notification to the Commission.
Retten fandt også, at Kommissionen havde handlet korrekt, da den udvidede licensen på Moulinex-varemærket til at omfatte alle kategorier af små husholdningsapparater, selv om der kun var påvist alvorlige problemer inden for en enkelt produktkategori.
The CFI also held the Commission was correct to extend the licence for the Moulinex trademark to all categories of small electrical appliances even though serious doubts were raised in respect of only one category of product.
Retten fandt, at beslutningen om at afvise fusionsparternes forslag om købere ændrede disse køberes retsstilling.
The CFI held that the decision to reject a proposal of the merging parties for a set of buyers modifies the legal position of those buyers.
Retten fandt, at bøder bør forhøjes betydeligt, når der er tale om gentagne overtrædelser.
The CFI considered that recidivism justifies a very significant increase in the fine.
Retten fandt, at bøderne i betragtning af overtrædelsens grove karakter og varighed var berettigede og korrekt udmålte.
The CFI considered that, in view of the gravity and duration of the infringement, the fines were justified and were calculated in an appropriate manner.
Retten fandt, at da beslutningen om fusionens uforenelighed var blevet annulleret, havde beslutningen om fusionens opløsning ikke længere noget retsgrundlag.
The Court held that, since the decision finding that the merger operation was incompatible with the common market had been annulled, the demerger decision had no basis in law.
Retten fandt, at de interne dokumenter angående GE's vertikale integration på det finansielle område gav afgørende bevis for en styrkelse af den dominerende stilling, GE før fusionen havde på markedet for jetmotorer, men at kommissionsbeslutningen ikke indeholdt tilstrækkeligt belæg for, at den fusionerede enhed ville udnytte sin finansielle styrke til at sikre, at aftagerne altid ville vælge Honeywells produkter.
Whilst the Court considered the internal documents on GE’s financial vertical integration conclusive for proving the reinforcement of GE’s pre‑merger dominance in jet engines, it concluded that the decision did not provide sufficient evidence that the new entity will use its financial leverage/strength to obtain selection of Honeywell products.
Retten fandt, at denne tilsidesættelse af Schneiders ret til at blive hørt havde påvirket sagens udfald i to henseender.
The CFI took the view that this infringement of Schneider’s rights of defence had affected the outcome of the proceedings in two respects.
Retten fandt, at det ville være i strid med det krav om hurtig sagsbehandling, der er indbygget i fusionsforordningen.
The CFI found that such an approach would conflict with the requirement of speed that characterises the general structure of the Merger Regulation.
Retten fandt, at eftersom de spanske myndigheder havde en særlig lovgivning til behandling af den pågældende fusion, var det rimeligt, at Kommissionen gik ud fra, at en henvisning til Spanien ville sikre den effektive konkurrence.
The CFI considered that, given that the Spanish authorities had specific legislation for dealing with the concentration concerned, the Commission acted reasonably in considering that the referral to Spain would preserve and not threaten effective competition.
Retten fandt, at forordningen skabte konflikter for medlemslandene i forhold til deres tidligere forpligtelser over for andre Warszawa-pagtlande, men nægtede at henvise sagen til EF-Domstolen.
The latter found that the Regulation created conflicts for Member States in relation to their prior obligations to other Warsaw Treaty States, but declined to refer the matter to the European Court of Justice.
Retten fandt, at gennemførelsen af en sådan fusion til fordel for virksomheder, der er konkurrenter til de klagende virksomheder, kan medføre en øjeblikkelig ændring af de sidstnævnte virksomheders stilling på det eller de berørte markeder.
It considered that the implementation of such a transaction for the benefit of undertakings in competition with the complainants is likely to bring about an immediate change in the complainants' situation in the market or markets concerned.
Retten fandt, at Kommissionen havde undladt at handle, idet den ikke havde afhjulpet de procedurefejl og materielle uregelmæssigheder, der havde påvirket indefrysningen af sagsøgerens midler.
The General Court ruled that the Commission had failed to act as it had not remedied procedural deficiencies and substantive irregularities affecting the freezing of Mr Yusef’s funds.
Retten fandt, at Kommissionen ikke havde godtgjort, at detailforhandlerne ville reagere på den måde i stedet for blot at vælte prisforhøjelserne over på de endelige forbrugere.
The CFI found that the Commission had not established that retailers would behave in the manner described and not simply pass on the price increases to end-consumers.
Retten fandt, at parternes udtalelser af 27. juni 2000 kun kunne fortolkes sådan, at de opgav den fusionsaftale, der var blevet anmeldt efter fusionsforordningen.
The Court considers that the parties’ statement of 27 June 2000 could only be interpreted as entailing the lapsing of the merger agreement notified under the Merger Regulation.
Retten fandt, at sagsøgers interesse i at anlægge passivitetssøgsmål var bortfaldet, fordi Kommissionen ved det sidste brevs fremsendelse havde taget endelig stilling til klagen, og passivitetssøgsmålet kunne derfor ikke tages til behandling.
The CFI had found that the applicants' interest in bringing an action for failure to act had ceased, on the basis that the Commission had by the last letter adopted its final position on the complaint and thus the action for failure to act was inadmissible.
Retten fandt, at støtten under den nye aftale ikke var tildelt i overensstemmelse med proceduren i EF-traktatens artikel 88, stk. 3, og derfor var ulovlig.
The Court of Justice found in this instance that the aid instituted by the new agreement was not granted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty and therefore was unlawful.
Retten fandt, at sådanne negative beløb ikke blot bidrager til manglende gennemsigtighed i budgetprocessen, men at de også krænker bruttoprincippet.
The Court considered that such negative amounts not only contribute to a lack of transparency in the budget process but also infringe the principle of universality.
Retten fandt, at «det således tilkom Kommissionen, for hver af de offentlige organer og under hensyn til ovennævnte faktorer, at afgøre, om gældseftergivelsen var klart mere omfattende end den, som en tænkt privat kreditor, der i videst muligt omfang antages at indtage den samme stilling i forhold til sagsøgeren som det pågældende offentlige organ, og som søger at inddrive de beløb, han har til gode, ville være gået med til».
The Court considers that it was incumbent on the Commission to determine, for each of the public bodies concerned and taking into account the above‑mentioned factors, whether the debt remission it had granted was manifestly more substantial than that which would have been granted by a hypothetical private creditor placed, vis‑à‑vis the applicant, in a situation comparable to that of the public body concerned and trying to recover sums due to it.
Retten fastholdt, at Rådet havde foretaget et forkert skøn, da det nægtede at give aktindsigt i et af de forhandlingsdirektiver, det havde vedtaget.
The Court held that the Council made an error of assessment in refusing access to one of the negotiating directives it had adopted.
Retten fastlægger selv, hvordan den finder det rimeligt, at sagen skal foregå.
The court may adopt any method of proceeding that it considers to be fair, and limit cross-examination.
Retten fastslog endelig, at Kommissionen ikke havde levet op til de krav, der stilles til beviset for, at de efterfølgende nedjusteringer var i strid med de traktatfæstede mål, og annullerede denne del af kommissionsbeslutningen.
The Court finally concluded that the Commission had not proved to the requisite legal standard that the downwards ex-post adjustments were contrary to the objectives of the Treaty and annulled the relevant part of the decision.
Retten fastslog, at for så vidt som direktiv 2004/37/EF ikke henviser til andre stoffer ud over benzen, vinylchloridmonomer eller støv fra løvtræer, for hvilke det fastlægger grænseværdier for erhvervsmæssig eksponering, kan det hverken anses for at være "specifikt" eller for at fastsætte "mindstekrav" i henhold til artikel 58, stk. 2, i REACH-forordningen.
The General Court held that in so far as Directive 2004/37/EC does not refer to any substance other than benzene, vinyl chloride monomer or hardwood dusts, for which it lays down maximum values for occupational exposure, it cannot be considered either ‘specific’ or to impose ‘minimum requirements’, within the meaning of Article 58 (2) of REACH.
Retten fastslog, at Kommissionen burde have foretaget en samlet undersøgelse af de foranstaltninger, der var truffet af regionen Vallonien og lufthavnen Charleroi Bruxelles Sud, og have anvendt det private investorprincip på Valloniens foranstaltninger, da der var nære økonomiske forbindelser mellem disse to myndigheder.
The Court held that the Commission should have examined the measures granted by the Walloon Region and by Brussels South Charleroi Airport together and should have applied the private investor principle to the measures adopted by the Walloon Region, since there were close economic links binding these two entities.
Retten fastslog, at Kommissionen havde sikret, i) at der var oprettet veldefinerede systemer med centrale kontroller, inden der kunne udbetales midler, ii) at procedurerne var godt dokumenteret, iii) at systemerne generelt fungerede i praksis, og iv) at kontrolprocedurerne for de fleste dossierers vedkommende var blevet fulgt.
It stated that it had ensured that (i) well defined systems with key controls were in place before any funds could be spent; (ii) the procedures were well documented; (iii) the systems were generally working in practice, and (iv) for most files reviewed the checking procedures were followed.
Retten fastsætter en skala, i henhold til hvilken de forskellige skader kan vurderes, og som den instans, hvem opgaven med at fordele beløbet er pålagt, herefter er forpligtet til at lægge til grund for fordelingen.
The judge shall set out an assessment grid for the different categories of damages and it will be up to the body responsible for distributing the sums involved to base its calculations on this grid.
Retten fastsætter i sin kendelse en dato for, hvornår strafspørgsmålet vil blive afgjort.
In its decision the court sets the date for sentencing.
Retten finder anvendelse på dokumentationsmateriale og sagens forberedelse.
The right applies to documentary material and the pre-trial proceedings.
Retten for alle erhvervskunder på gasmarkedet til frit at vælge leverandør, senest fra den 1. juli 2004, og for alle andre kunder fra den 1. juli 2007.
The right for all non-household gas customers to freely choose their supplier no later than 1 July 2004 with all customer to have this right by 1 July 2007.
Retten for alle medlemsstater til at anvende nedsatte satser udvides kun til de kategorier af varer og ydelser, som der er særlige undtagelsesforanstaltninger eller andre bestemmelser for, der allerede tillader en række medlemsstater at anvende nedsatte satser eller fritagelser, når man ikke har kunnet konstatere, at det var til skade for det indre markeds funktion.
extending the option for Member States to apply reduced rates only to the categories of goods and services for which specific derogations or other provisions already authorise a certain number of Member States to apply reduced rates or exemptions and where this has not been found to hinder the proper functioning of the internal market.
Retten for alle unionsborgere til at færdes og opholde sig frit på medlemsstaternes område er nedfældet i artikel 18 i traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab.
The right of all Union citizens to live and travel freely within the territory of the Member States is enshrined in Article 18 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Retten for personer, som i lang tid har opholdt sig i en medlemsstat, til at tage ophold i en anden medlemsstat kunne være en vigtig mobilitetsfaktor på arbejdsmarkedet i EU.
The right of abode in another Member State for long-term residents could be an important factor of mobility within the labour market of the Union.
Retten forkastede således sagsøgernes argument og bekræftede sin retspraksis vedrørende dette spørgsmål25.
The General Court thus rejected the applicants’ argument, confirming its case-law on the issue.25
Retten fremhævede dog, at der ved vurderingen af eventuelle porteføljeeffekter også skal tages hensyn til markeder uden større overlapninger, hvis parterne forud for fusionen allerede har høje markedsandele.
However, the CFI emphasised that markets with non-significant overlaps, but where the parties already have high market shares before the merger, should also be taken into account in the assessment of any portfolio effects.
Retten fremhævede, at en konkurrent skal kunne bevise, at han individuelt berøres af Kommissionens beslutning for at kunne anfægte beslutningen.
The CFI emphasized that a competitor, in order to challenge a decision by the Commission, has to show that it is individually concerned by the decision.
Retten gav af disse grunde de italienske myndigheder medhold i deres klage over indledningen af proceduren.
For these reasons, the Court declared the action by the Italian government against the initiation of the procedure admissible.
Retten gav Kommissionen medhold med hensyn til afgrænsningen af produktmarkedet og det geografiske marked for varmvalsede bredplader og konkluderede, at Kommissionen ikke havde begået nogen åbenlys fejl i sin vurdering af fusionens virkninger på markedet for rør med stor diameter.
The CFI upheld the Commission's conclusions as to the product and geographic scope of the market for hot rolled wide strip and concluded that the Commission did not commit any manifest error in assessing the effects of the concentration on the market for large diameter pipes.
Retten gjorde det imidlertid klart, at der på det relevante tidspunkt endnu ikke var blevet vedtaget procedureregler på grundlag af EF-traktatens artikel 89.
The Court made it clear, however, that, at the relevant time, no rules of procedure had yet been adopted on the basis of Article 89 of the EC Treaty.
Retten godtog ingen af de forskellige argumenter, som parterne havde fremført for at påvise, at der ikke var tale om en overtrædelse, og at deres adfærd ikke kunne påvirke samhandelen mellem medlemsstaterne.
The Court did not accept any of the various arguments by which the parties sought to show that there had been no infringement and that their behaviour had not been capable of affecting trade between Member States.
Retten har anerkendt muligheden for at begrænse grundlæggende friheder begrundet med et tvingende alment hensyn, som i dette tilfælde er offentlighedens ret til information som et element i ytringsfriheden og retten til information5.
The General Court has recognised the possibility of restricting fundamental freedoms for overriding reasons of public interest, which in this case is the public's right to information as an element of freedom of expression and information5.
Retten har derimod afvist alle sagsøgers øvrige indsigelser, især indsigelsen vedrørende den manglende anvendelse af princippet om regional disciplin for ad hoc-sektorstøtte og indsigelsen vedrørende påvirkning af samhandelen på grundlag af globale oplysninger uden nogen konkret analytisk påvisning.
On the other hand, the Court dismissed all the other complaints formulated by the applicant, in particular that concerning the non‑application of the regional discipline principle to an ad hoc sectoral aid and that concerning the effect on trade based on global data without any concrete analytical demonstration.
Retten har ofte betydelige skønsbeføjelser til inden for disse to yderpunkter at fastsætte bødens størrelse.
Between the two extremes, the court commonly has a considerable discretion to set the fine.
Retten har pålagt …
The court has ordered
Retten har udstedt kendelse om, at indestående på følgende bankkonto tilhørende sagsøgte skal sikres op til det i punkt 6.5. angivne beløb:
The court has ordered, that following bank account of the defendant has to be preserved up to amount noted in point 6.5:
Retten havde statueret, at i sager angående konglomeratfusioner, hvor den fremtidige skabelse af en dominerende stilling afhænger af, om den fusionerede enhed har incitament til at bruge konglomerateffekten som løftestang eller ej, burde Kommissionen også overveje, om den ulovlige karakter af visse former for løftestangsudnyttelse efter EF-traktatens artikel 82 og sandsynligheden for at blive afsløret og straffet kan afholde fra at anlægge en sådan adfærd.
The CFI had held that in conglomerate cases, where the future creation of a dominant position depends on the incentives and disincentives for the merged entity to engage in leveraging behaviour, the Commission should also consider whether the illegality of certain leveraging behaviour under Article 82 EC and the likelihood of detection and punishment might deter the merged entity from such a line of conduct.
Retten i domsstaten udsteder den i stk. 1 omhandlede attest på begæring af en indehaver af samværsretten og med anvendelse af standardformularen i bilag VI (attest vedrørende samværsret).
The certificate is issued by the court of origin at the request of a holder of rights of access and using the standard form in Annex VI (certificate concerning rights of access).
Retten i domsstaten udsteder denne attest på eget initiativ og med anvendelse af standardformularen i bilag VII (attest vedrørende tilbagegivelse).
The court of origin shall issue that certificate at its own initiative and using the standard form in Annex VII (certificate concerning return).
Retten i domsstaten udsteder kun den attest, der er knyttet til afgørelsen om tilbagegivelse, hvis visse processuelle garantier har været iagttaget under sagen, navnlig at parterne og barnet har haft mulighed for at blive hørt 64.
The court of origin will only issue the certificate accompanying the return order if certain procedural safeguards have been applied during the procedure before it, in particular if the parties and the child were given an opportunity to be heard64.
Retten i domsstaten udsteder kun den i stk. 1 omhandlede attest, hvis barnet har haft mulighed for at blive hørt, medmindre en høring er fundet uhensigtsmæssig på grund af barnets alder eller modenhed.
The court of origin shall issue the certificate referred to in paragraph 1 only if the child was given an opportunity to be heard, unless a hearing was considered inappropriate having regard to his or her age or degree of maturity.
Retten i domsstaten udsteder kun den i stk. 1 omhandlede attest, hvis:
The court of origin shall issue the certificate referred to in paragraph 1 only if:
Retten i en anden medlemsstat, end den hvori centret for skyldnerens hovedinteresser befinder sig, har ikke kompetence til at indlede en insolvensbehandling, med mindre skyldneren har et forretningssted i medlemsstaten.
The courts of a Member State other than that in which the centre of main interests is located are empowered to open insolvency proceedings only if the debtor possesses an establishment within that state.
Retten i Første Instans afsagde den 6. marts en dom i WestLB-sagen345 vedrørende overdragelse af Wohnungsbauförderungsanstalt (Wfa) til WestLB og impliceringen af statsstøtte i transaktionen.
On 6 March, the Court of First Instance (CFI) gave judgment in the WestLB case345 concerning the transfer of the Wohnungsbauförderungsanstalt (Wfa) to WestLB and the involvement of state aid in this transaction.
Retten i Første Instans afviste det argument, at kun støtte godkendt efter fuldstændig liberalisering kan betragtes som ny støtte.
The Court of First Instance rejected the argument that only aid granted after full liberalisation can be classified as new aid.
Retten i Første Instans annullerede den beslutning, hvorved Kommissionen i 2004 pålagde Belgien at tilbagesøge uforenelig støtte til Ryanair i forbindelse med selskabets etablering i Charleroi lufthavn144.
The Court of First Instance annulled a Commission decision of 2004 ordering Belgium to recover incompatible aid extended to Ryanair linked to its establishment at Charleroi airport144.
Retten i Første Instans annullerede ved sin dom af 19. oktober til dels Kommissionens beslutning om Tysklands statsstøtte til CDA Compact Disc Albrechts GmbH (Thüringen), for så vidt som Tyskland fik pålagt at tilbagesøge støtten til andre virksomheder end den oprindelige modtager.
By its judgment of 19 October in this case, the CFI partly annulled the Commission decision concerning state aid granted by Germany to CDA Compact Disc Albrechts GmbH (Thuringia) in so far as it ordered Germany to recover aid to undertakings other than the initial recipient.
Retten i Første Instans er generelt anden og sidste instans i tvister om EF-patenter.
In principle Community patent disputes are heard by the Court of First Instance in second and last resort.
Retten i Første Instans fastslog det princip, at tilvejebringelse af oplysninger, der ikke kan betragtes som samarbejde, der falder ind under samarbejdsmeddelelsen, men som ikke desto mindre bidrager til Kommissionens undersøgelse, kan betragtes som samarbejde uden for samarbejdsmeddelelsens rammer (ifølge afsnit 3, punkt 6 i retningslinjerne).
The CFI also set out the principle that the provision of information which cannot be regarded as cooperation falling within the scope of the Leniency Notice, but which nevertheless assists the Commission in its investigation, constitutes effective cooperation outside the scope of the notice (within the meaning of the sixth indent of Section 3 of the guidelines).
Retten i Første Instans fastsætter ved retspraksis, under hvilke omstændigheder en part ikke med rimelighed kunne forventes at have fremført faktiske omstændigheder og beviser under sagen i første instans, hvilket giver Retten den fornødne fleksibilitet til at tage hensyn til alle de situationer, der kan forekomme i praksis.
It is left to the Court of First Instance to establish through jurisprudence under what circumstances the submission of facts and evidence could not have been reasonably expected at first instance leaving the necessary flexibility to take account of all the possible situations that may occur in practise.
Retten i Første Instans har afsagt kendelse om, at når oprindelsesmedlemsstaten har anmodet om, at et dokument ikke videregives, er det de relevante nationale bestemmelser og ikke forordningen, der bestemmer, hvordan aktindsigt i dette dokument behandles21.
The Court of First Instance held that, where the originating Member State has requested that a document not be disclosed, the application for access to that document is governed by the relevant national provisions and not by the Regulation21.