natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende mundtlige ændringsforslag godkendt af ordføreren uden afstemning:
The following oral amendments were approved by the rapporteur and section without a vote in the point-by-point examination:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringer godkendt af medordførerne og sektionen:
In the course of the page-by-page examination the following amendments were accepted by the co-rapporteurs and the section.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet.
During the point-by-point discussion, the following proposed amendments were examined:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
During the detailed discussion of the Draft Opinion, the following amendments were considered:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
During the detailed examination of the Opinion the following amendment was discussed:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
During the page-by-page discussion, the following proposed amendments were considered:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
During the page-by-page examination of the opinion, the following amendments were discussed:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
During the page-by-page examination, the following amendments were discussed:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
During the point-by-point discussion, the following amendments were examined:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
During the point-by-point examination, the following amendments were discussed:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
During the point-by-point review, the following amendments were considered:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
In the course of the detailed analysis, the following proposals for amendments were discussed:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
In the point-by-point examination of the opinion, amendments were dealt with as follows:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
The following amendments were discussed during the detailed examination of the draft opinion:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
The following amendments were discussed during the page-by-page examination of the text:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
The following amendments were discussed in the course of the page-by-page examination of the Opinion:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
The following amendments were discussed in the point-by-point review:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
The following amendments were examined during the page-by-page discussion:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
The following amendments were examined during the point-by-point examination of the draft opinion:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
The following amendments were examined in the course of the point-by-point consideration of the opinion :
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
The following proposals for amendments were tabled during the detailed examination:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag behandlet:
The opinion was examined point by point, together with the following amendments:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag fra Lars Nyberg taget op til behandling:
During the page-by-page examination, the amendments tabled by Mr Nyberg were considered:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag fra Ulla SIRKEINEN vedtaget:
In the ensuing debate on the individual points of the Opinion, the following amendments submitted by Mrs SIRKEINEN were adopted:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag godkendt:
Amendments to the following points were accepted during the detailed discussion of the draft opinion:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslag sat under afstemning:
During the detailed examination of the Opinion, the following amendments were considered:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev følgende ændringsforslaglagt frem:
In the course of the page by page discussion, the following amendments were presented:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev korrigendummet og ændringsforslagene til pkt. 2.3.1 fra Clare Carroll, til pkt. 3.2 fra Harry Byrne, Daniel Retureau og Paul Verhaeghe og til pkt. 4.1 fra Alma Williams accepteret og ville blive inkorporeret i teksten af ordføreren.
During the point by point discussion, the section approved the corrigendum and the modifications to point 2.3.1 suggested by Ms Carroll, to point 3.2 suggested by Mr Byrne, Mr Retureau and Mr Verhaeghe, and to point 4.1 suggested by Ms Williams, and it was agreed that they would be incorporated into the text by the rapporteur.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev man enig om at indføje nogle af de bemærkninger, der fremsattes til pkt. 2.2.5 (videreuddannelse - efter forslag fra Rudolf Strasser); pkt. 2.3.2 (de multinationales rolle - efter forslag fra Göran Lagerholm og indlæg fra Rudolf Strasser, José Bento Gonçalves og Paul Verhaeghe); pkt. 2.3.8 (privatisering i Central- og Østeuropa, og uddannelse - efter forslag fra Göran Lagerholm og Kommer de Knegt); pkt. 4.3.2.1 (sammensætningen af Forest Stewardship Council - efter forslag fra Göran Lagerholm).
The meeting then turned to the point-by-point examination, in the course of which a number of additions were made to the text by common accord, in relation to point 2.2.5 (continuing training, at the suggestion of Mr Strasser), point 2.3.2 (role of the multinationals, at the suggestion of Mr Lagerholm and following interventions by Mr Strasser, Mr Bento Gonçalves and Mr Verhaeghe), point 2.3.8 (privatisations in central and eastern Europe and the role of training, at the suggestion of Mr Lagerholm and Mr de Knegt), point 4.3.2.1 (membership of the Forest Stewardship Council, at the suggestion of Mr Lagerholm).
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev Mendza Drozds ændringsforslag til punkt 3.3.1 (CESE 1600/2004 ændr.
In the course of a detailed examination of the draft opinion, amendments tabled by Ms Mendza-Drozd to point 3.3.1.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev MOBBS' og SCHMITZ' ændringsforslag til punkt 3.4 og 3.5 vedtaget.
During the detailed examination of the document amendments to points 3.4 and 3.5 proposed by Mr Mobbs and Mr Schmitz  were accepted.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev Rudolf GAUDER's ændringsforslag til punkt 2.1. og 2.13. godkendt.
During the page by page examination, the rewording proposed by Mr Gauder was accepted in the case of points 2.l. and 2.l3.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev udtalelsen ændret på følgende punkter:
In the course of the page-by-page discussion, the following points were amended:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev ændringsforslagene fra Gilbert Bros (nyt punkt 2.4) og Joan Caball i Subirana (nyt punkt 3.5) godkendt.
During the point-by-point examination, the amendments tabled by Mr Bros (new point 2.4) and Mr Caball i Subirana (new point 3.5) were accepted.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev ændringsforslagene fra Jean-Claude Sabin (pkt. 2.4 og 2.4.2) accepteret af P.L.H. Geraads og indføjet i udtalelsen.
In the point-by-point discussion of the opinion, the amendments tabled by Mr Sabin (points 2.4 and 2.4.2) were accepted by Mr Geraads and incorporated in the opinion.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev ændringsforslagene fra P.L.H. Geraads behandlet:
In the course of the point-by-point discussion amendments tabled by Mr Geraards were examined:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev ændringsforslagene til følgende punkter godkendt af ordføreren og sektionen:
Amendments to the following points were accepted by the rapporteur and the section during the detailed discussion:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev ændringsforslagene til følgende punkter godkendt:
Amendments to the following points were accepted during the detailed examination of the draft opinion:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev ændringsforslagene til følgende punkter godkendt:
The following amendments were accepted during the detailed examination of the draft opinion:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang blev ændringsforslagene til punkt 2.14 og 3.1 forkastet med 2 stemmer for, 25 imod og 7 hverken for eller imod.
During the detailed examination of the text the amendments to points 2.14 and 3.1 were rejected by 25 votes to two with seven abstentions.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang drøftede forsamlingen følgende ændringsforslag:
During the detailed examination of the Opinion, the following amendments were tabled:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang drøftede forsamlingen følgende ændringsforslag:
In the course of the detailed analysis, the following proposals for amendment were discussed:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang drøftede forsamlingen følgende ændringsforslag:
The following amendments were discussed during the page-by-page examination:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang drøftedes mundtlige ændringsforslag fra Giacomina Cassina.
The oral amendments tabled by Ms Cassina were discussed, point by point.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang drøftedes ændringsforslagene fra Gilbert Bros (skriftlige ændringsforslag – pkt. 4, 5, 3.1 og 7.1), Karin Alleweldt (skriftlige ændringsforslag – pkt. 9.2, 5.8 og 5.9) og Eva Belabed (skriftlige ændringsforslag - pkt. 11, 12, 5.6, 7.2, 9.3, 11.2, 11.5).
The amendments tabled by Mr Bros (written amendments - points 4, 5, 3.1, 7.1), Ms Alleweldt (written amendments - points 9.2, 5.8, 5.9), and Ms Belabed (written amendments - points 11, 12, 5.6, 7.2, 9.3, 11.2, 11.5) were discussed, point by point.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang drøftedes ændringsforslagene fra Soldeus (skriftlige ændringsforslag – pkt. 2.2, 4, 5, 6 og 7) og Elżbieta Szadzińska og Malgorzata Niepokulczycka (skriftlige ændringsforslag – pkt. 7.3 og 8.1).
The amendments tabled by Ms Soldeus (written amendments - points 2.2, 4, 5, 6 and 7) and Ms Elżbieta Szadzińska and Ms Małgorzata Niepokulczycka (written amendments - points 7.3 and 8.1), were discussed, point by point.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang erklærede Georgios Sklavounos sig rede til at acceptere Léon Druckers henstilling om NGO'ernes rolle og Ann Davisons om samarbejde mellem de etniske grupper.
During the page-by-page examination of the opinion, Mr Sklavounos said he was willing to accept Mr Drucker's recommendation on the role of NGOs and Mrs Davison's on cooperation between ethnic groups.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang foreslog Daniel Retureau en kraftigere formulering af pkt. 3.2, og John Donnelly påpegede nogle fejl i punkt 1.3.1 og 4.3.
During the point-by-point examination, Mr Retureau asked for point 3.2 to be reinforced, and Mr Donnelly pointed out a number of mistakes in points 1.3.1 and 4.3.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang foreslog Giacomina Cassina ændringer i punkterne 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.3.1 og 3.2.3.2 som følge af ovennævnte indlæg, af ændringsforslag fra Brenda King til punkt 3.2.3.2 og af specifikke bemærkninger fra Ann Le Nouail-Marlière og Luis Miguel Pariza Castaños.
During the point-by-point discussion, Ms Cassina proposed several amendments to points 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.3.1 and 3.2.3.2, following on from the earlier speakers, an amendment by Ms King to 3.2.3.2, and specific comments by Ms Le Nouail-Marlière and Mr Pariza Castaños.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang foreslog Kenneth Walker, Peter Boldt og Ann Davison visse ændringer, som ordføreren ville tage hensyn til.
The section discussed the opinion paragraph-by-paragraph, and Mr Walker, Mr Boldt and Ms Davison suggested amendments, which the rapporteur agreed to take into consideration.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang foreslog ORDFØREREN visse redaktionelle ændringer som sektionen vedtog.
In the course of the point-by-point examination a number of drafting changes suggested by the rapporteur were accepted by the Section.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang foretog ORDFØREREN to mindre redaktionelle ændringer.
During the page-by-page examination of the document the rapporteur introduced two minor amendments to the drafting.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang forkastede sektionen Staffan Nilssons forslag om at ændre første punktum i punkt 4.9.1 med 13 stemmer for, 8 imod og 5 hverken for eller imod.
During the detailed examination of the text the section rejected the proposal of Mr Nilsson to amend the first sentence of 4.9.1 by 13 to eight with five abstentions.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremkom GIESECKE, BEALE, STRAUSS, GAFO FERNANDEZ, LINDMARK og GRUSELIN med forslag til tilføjelser og yderligere præciseringer af teksten, og disse blev godkendt af ordføreren.
In the page-by-page examination Mr Giesecke, Mr Beale, Mr Strauss, Mr Gafo‑Fernandez , Mr Lindmark and Mr Gruselin offered suggestions for clarifying and completing the text and they were accepted by the rapporteur.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremlagde Maria Luísa Santiago et ændringsforslag, som tilføjede et nyt punkt om det ønskelige i en nærmere undersøgelse af, hvilke faktorer der medvirker til nedgangen i fiskeressourcerne.
In the point-by-point examination, Mrs Santiago tabled an amendment adding a new point on the need for more detailed research into other factors which also acted to reduce resources still further.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremlagde Neville BEALE et skriftligt ændringsforslag, som Kommer de KNEGT gik imod.
In the page-by-page discussion a written amendment was proposed by Mr BEALE and opposed by Mr de KNEGT.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremlagde ordføreren en række mundtlige ændringsforslag til teksten.
In the point-by-point discussion, the rapporteur introduced a number of oral amendments to the text.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremlagde Robert MORELAND modudtalelsen, idet han understregede, at hans modstand ikke var rettet mod følgeretten som sådan, men skyldtes den manglende internationale harmonisering.
In the course of the page-by-page analysis, Mr Moreland presented the counter-opinion, again stressing that he was not opposed to the principle of resale right but to the lacking international harmonization.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremsatte Frederic Adrian Osborn følgende ændringsforslag:
During the point-by-point discussion, Mr Osborne tabled the following amendment:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremsatte G. Lagerholm følgende ændringsforslag:
The following amendments were tabled by Mr Lagerholm during the detailed examination:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremsatte Harald Glatz et ændringsforslag til punkt 2.1, som blev forkastet med 28 stemmer for, 32 imod og 6 hverken for eller imod.
Mr Glatz proposed an amendment to point 2.1 which was defeated by 32 votes to 28 with six abstentions.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremsatte María Sánchez Miguel og P.L.H. Geraads nogle kommentarer til henholdsvis pkt. 3.8 og pkt. 4.1.
In the point-by-point examination Mrs Sanchez Miguel commented on point 3.8 and Mr Geraads on point 4.1.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremsatte Sergio COLOMBO, Adalbert KIENLE og Maria SÁNCHEZ redaktionelle ændringsforslag, som blev accepteret af ORDFØREREN og vedtaget af sektionen.
In the course of the point-by-point examination drafting changes suggested by Mr Colombo, Mr Kienle and Mrs Sanchez were accepted by the rapporteur and the section.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang fremsattes følgende ændringsforslag:
The following amendments were tabled during the page-by-page examination of the opinion:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang gav John F. CARROLL udtryk for, at man i punkt 3 også burde beskæftige sig med tidsgrænserne for tilbagebetaling af diverse forsikringsbeløb mellem de forskellige medlemsstater.
In the detailed discussion of the draft opinion, Mr Carroll pointed out that mention could also be made in section 3 of deadlines for the refund of various insurance benefits among the different Member States.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang gentog BENTO GONÇALVES sit spørgsmål vedrørende pkt. 3.1. i forslaget til udtalelse og foreslog en omformulering.
There followed the point-by-point discussion, during which Mr Bento Gonçalves reiterated the question he had already raised regarding point 3.1 of the draft opinion and proposed that the point be reformulated.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang godkendte ordføreren og sektionen redaktionelle ændringer foreslået af Kommer de KNEGT til punkt 3.4.1 og af Markku LEMMETTY til punkt 3.5.6.
During the detailed discussion, the rapporteur and section accepted drafting changes proposed by Mr de Knegt (point 3.4.1) and Mr Lemmetty (point 3.5.6).
Under den detaljerede gennemgang godkendte sektionen, at ændringsforslagene fra Johann Költringer (pkt. 1.1, 2.4, 3.2, 4.9, 6.1 og 6.7) og José María Espuny Moyano (pkt. 4.4), der blev godkendt af ordføreren, inkorporeres i udtalelsen.
In the point-by-point discussion, the section agreed that amendments from Mr Költringer (points 1.1, 2.4, 3.2, 4.9, 6.1 and 6.7) and Mr Espuny Moyano (point 4.4), which had been accepted by the rapporteur, could be incorporated into the opinion.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang godkendtes de uddybende bemærkninger fra Kommissionens repræsentant samt de skriftlige ændringsforslag fra Adalbert Kienle i en kompromisudgave.
During the point-by-point examination of the document, the Commission representative provided clarification, and compromise versions were submitted for Mr Kienle's written amendments.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang havde følgende medlemmer ordet: MERIANO, VOGLER (der forelagde ENGELEN-KEFER's skriftlige ændringsforslag), Vasco CAL, MENGOZZI, zu EULENBURG og LIVERANI.
During the point-by-point discussion of the opinion, the following members spoke: Mr Meriano, Mr Vogler (who presented Mrs Engelen-Kefer's written amendment), Mr Cal, Mr Mengozzi, Mrs zu Eulenburg and Mr Liverani.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang kommenterede Kenneth Walker og J. Ignacio Gafo Fernández den frie adgang til det europæiske marked (punkt 6.4).
In the ensuing point-by-point discussion of the text, Mr Walker and Mr Gafo Fernández addressed the issue of free access to the EU market (point 6.4).
Under den detaljerede gennemgang kommenterede Susanna Florio pkt. 2.3.3, idet hun foreslog at nævne, at samarbejdsprogrammerne med NGO'erne ikke er af ny dato.
The document was examined page by page and Ms Florio intervened to comment on point 2.3.3, proposing to include a reference on the fact that co-operation programmes with NGOs "go back a long way".
Under den detaljerede gennemgang nåede man til enighed om de ændringsforslag, der var blevet fremsat af Filip Hamro-Drotz og Ann Davison samt om de øvrige mundtlige ændringsforslag.
During the point-by-point examination, an agreement was reached on the amendments tabled by Mr Hamro-Drotz and Mrs Davison and on the other changes to the document proposed orally.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang præsenterede Adalbert Kienle adskillige skriftlige ændringsforslag.
In the course of the page-by-page examination, several amendments were tabled in writing by Mr KIENLE.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang punkt for punkt behandlede forsamlingen følgende ændringsforslag:
During the point-by-point examination of the section opinion, the assembly considered the following amendments:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang påpegede Kommissionens repræsentant, at den foreslåede formulering i punkt 3.10 ville volde problemer i forbindelse med koordineringen af programmerne Ungdom, Socrates og Leonardo.
During the point-by-point discussion, the Commission representative pointed out that the proposed wording of point 3.10 would lead to difficulty in coordinating the Youth, Socrates and Leonardo programmes.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang sagde Edoardo Bagliano, at andet punktum i punkt 2.7 forekom ham uheldigt som slutsætning.
In the page-by-page examination, Mr Bagliano felt that the second sentence of point 2.7 was not a particularly felicitous one to end on.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang sagde ordføreren i forbindelse med punkt 2.3, at det nævnte forslag fra Kommissionen var blevet forelagt lige før jul; det var nu vigtigt, at det blev fulgt op.
In the course of the point-by-point discussion, the rapporteur commented, in connection with point 2.3, that the relevant Commission proposal came just before Christmas and stressed that action must be taken.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang stillede Georges LINSSEN og Rudolf STRASSER spørgsmål vedrørende indholdet af punkt 1.5.2.
During page-by-page examination of the document, Mr Linssen and Mr Strasser asked for clarification of point 1.5.2.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang stillede Jean GAUTIER følgende ændringsforslag:
In the point-by-point examination of the text, the following amendment by Mr GAUTIER had been tabled:
Under den detaljerede gennemgang tog følgende medlemmer ordet: Enrico Kirschen, Armel Gourmelon, Christa Schweng og Clare Carroll.
During the page-by-page discussion, the following members spoke: Mr Kirschen, Mr Gourmelon, Ms Schweng and Ms Carroll.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang tog følgende medlemmer ordet: Vitor Melícias, Jan Olsson, Soscha zu Eulenburg, John Little og Roger Burnel.
During the point by point examination, Mr Melícias, Mr Olsson, Ms zu Eulenburg, Mr Little and Mr Burnel spoke.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang tog følgende ordet: Seppo Kallio, Staffan Nilsson, Adrien Bedossa, P.L.H. Geraads, Claude Cambus, Luca Jahier, Neilsen, Juan Moreno Preciados, Filip Hamro-Drotz, Pesci, Roberto Confalonieri, Renate Heinisch, Corrado Rossitto og Lutz Ribbe.
In the page-by-page discussion which ensued, the following members took the floor: Mr Kallio, Mr Nilsson, Mr Bedossa, Mr Geraads, Mr Cambus, Mr Jahier, Mr Neilsen, Mr Moreno Preciados, Mr Hamro-Drotz, Mr Pesci, Mr Confalonieri, Mr Heinisch, Mr Rossito and Mr Ribbe.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang tog Gilbert Bros, Joan Caball i Subirana, Adalbert Kienle, Fernando Moraleda Quilez, Staffan Nilsson, Lutz Ribbe, Yves Somville, Rudolf Strasser og Michel Van De Steene ordet.
Mr Bros, Mr Caball i Subirana, Mr Kienle, Mr Moraleda, Mr Nilsson, Mr Ribbe, Mr Somville, Mr Strasser and Mr van de Steene spoke in the point-by-point examination.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang tog Hans-Joachim Wilms og Kommissionens repræsentant, Emmanuel Jacquin (GD for Landbrug), ordet.
Mr Wilms and the Commission representative, Mr Jacquin (DG AGRI) spoke in the point-by-point examination.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang tog Nikolaos Lerios ordet, og der blev foretaget redaktionelle ændringer.
Mr Lerios also spoke during the page-by-page discussion of the opinion, and a number of stylistic changes were made to the text.
Under den detaljerede gennemgang var der indlæg fra Kommer de Knegt (pkt. 2.2) og Leif E. Nielsen (pkt. 2.3).
During the point-by-point examination, suggestions were made by Mr de Knegt (point 2.2) and Mr Nielsen (point 2.3).
Under den detaljerede gennemgang var der indlæg fra María Sánchez Miguel (pkt. 4.1) og Paolo Braghin (pkt 2.4.2).
In the point-by-point examination there were comments from Mrs Sánchez Miguel (point 4.1) and Mr Braghin (point 2.4.2).
Under den detaljerede gennemgang var der indlæg fra Paolo Braghin (pkt. 2.4, 2.8, 2.15, 2.18), Lutz Ribbe (pkt. 1.6, 2.1, 2.18, 2.19 og 2.20, nyt pkt) Leif E. Nielsen (pkt. 2.2.1) Johann Költringer (pkt. 2.19), Rudolf Strasser (pkt. 2.18 og 2.19), Kommer de Knegt (pkt. 2.18) John Donnelly (pkt. 2.18).
During the point-by-point examination of the text, comments were made by Mr Braghin (points 2.4, 2.8, 2.15, 2.18), Mr Ribbe (points 1.6, 2.1, 2.18, 2.19 and a new point 2.20), Mr Nielsen (point 2.2.1) Mr Költringer (point 2.19), Mr Strasser (points 2.18 and 2.19), Mr de Knegt (point 2.18), and Mr Donnelly (point 2.18).