natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Paul Verhaeghe henviste ligeledes til betydningen af subsidiaritetsprincippet og sagde, at det må anvendes i begge retninger for fuldt ud at garantere, at kontorets målsætninger nås.
Mr VERHAEGHE also referred to the importance of the subsidiarity principle, saying that this must be applied in both directions to fully guarantee the success of the FVO's objectives.
Paul VERHAEGHE's ændringsforslag til punkt 2.8 om et alternativ til den foreslåede EU-databank om detaljer om kliniske afprøvninger rejste en livlig debat og krævede yderligere oplysninger fra Kommissionen.
Mr Verhaeghe's amendment to point 2.8, suggesting an alternative to the proposed EU data bank on details of clinical trials, generated a heated debate and required clarification from the Commission.
Paul Verhaeghe, belgisk medlem af ØSU's Arbejdsgivergruppe, var ordfører for begge udtalelser.
In both cases the rapporteur was Mr Verhaeghe, a Belgian member of the Committee's Employers' Group.
Paul Verhaghe anmodede derefter om, at omtalen af husholdningsaffald som årsag til dioxin- og funanemissioner i tilfælde af forbrænding slettes.
With regard to point 2.5.1, Mr Verhaeghe called for the deletion of the sentence in which reference was made to the fact that the incineration of  food remains was a possible source of emissions of dioxins and furans.
Paul WEBER
Mr WEBER
Paul WEBER (regeringsrepræsentant)
Mr Paul WEBER (GOVERNMENT)
Paul WEBER / L
Paul WEBER / LUX
Paul-Henri Spaak (Europa-Parlamentet)
European Parliament – Paul Henri SPAAK building
Paul-Henri Spaak (Europa-Parlamentet)
European Parliament – Paul-Henri Spaak
Paul-Henri Spaak (Europa-Parlamentet)
Paul Henri Spaak (European Parliament)
Paul-Henri Spaak (Europa-Parlamentet)
Paul-Henri Spaak (European Parliament)
Paul-Henri Spaak (Europa-Parlamentet)
Paul-Henri Spaak Building (European Parliament)
Paul-Henri Spaak (Europa-Parlamentet) – Mødesal P3C 50
Paul Henri Spaak (European Parliament) – Room P3C 50
Paul-Henri Spaak-bygningen (Europa-Parlamentet)
Paul-Henri Spaak (European Parliament)
Paul-Henri Spaak-bygningen (Europa-Parlamentet)
Paul-Henri Spaak Building (European Parliament)
Paul-Henri Spaaks forslag om at oprette et fællesmarked kom som en overraskelse for alle deltagerne, men de bakkede op om idéen.
Paul-Henri Spaak's proposal to create a common market had come as a surprise to all participants, and the idea had won their approval.
Paula –Thiede Ufer 10
Paula–Thiede Ufer 10
Paula-Thiede-Ufer 10
Paula-Thiede-Ufer- 10
Paulette HALLEUX (for Gruppe III)
Mrs Paulette HALLEUX (for Group III)
Paulette HALLEUX (for Gruppe III)
Ms Paulette HALLEUX (for Group III)
Paulette HALLEUX (for Gruppe III)
Paulette HALLEUX (for Group III)
Pauline FAUGHAN (for Gruppe III)
Dr Pauline FAUGHNAN (for Group III)
Pauline FAUGHNAN (for Gruppe III)
Dr Pauline FAUGHNAN (for Group III)
Pauline FAUGHNAN (for Gruppe III)
Mrs Pauline FAUGHNAN  (for Group III)
Pauline FAUGHNAN (for Gruppe III)
Mrs Pauline FAUGHNAN (for Group III)
Paulis (GD for Konkurrence)
Paulis (DG COMP)
PAULIS (GD IV)
Toft (DG IV)
PAULIS forklarede, at brug af automatiske frister nødvendiggjorde særdeles stor varsomhed; hvis den ordning, som gjaldt for analyse af sammenslutninger, blev udstrakt til også at gælde andre sagsfelter, skulle hver enkelt sag behandles som et prioriteret anliggende.
Mr Paulis explained that applying automatic deadlines required considerable prudence; if the system for analysing mergers was extended to cover files on other issues, each case would have to be dealt with as a priority.
Paulis fra Kommissionens GD for Konkurrence fik derefter ordet og takkede sektionen for dens kompetente udtalelse og støtte, som Kommissionen værdsatte højt.
Mr Paulis, from the Commission's Competition DG, then spoke, thanking the Section for its competent opinion and for its support, which the Commission valued highly.
PAULIS indledte med at nævne, at GD IV ikke beskæftigede sig med mindre sager, men erklærede sig i øvrigt enig med MALOSSE; man burde nemlig tage Kommissionens indfaldsvinkel op til ny vurdering, således at man kunne lette SMV'ernes indsats (og i stedet koncentrere sig om virksomheder med større indflydelse på markedet).
Mr Paulis, having pointed out that DG IV did not deal with the minor cases, agreed with Mr Malosse; he felt indeed that the Commission's approach ought to be reviewed so as to facilitate SME action (focusing however on those firms which had the greatest influence on the market).
PAULIS sagde, at der ikke var nogen forbindelse mellem WTO's arbejdsgruppe og de sociale bestemmelser.
Mr Paulis said that there was no link between the WTO working group and the social clauses.
PAULIS svarede, at den lange sagsbehandling skyldtes, at nogle sager var særdeles komplekse; regeringskonferencen havde ikke godkendt oprettelsen af et selvstændigt organ for konkurrencepolitikken.
Mr Paulis replied that the protracted assessment deadlines were warranted by the extreme complexity of some of the cases being dealt with; the IGC had not accepted the need for setting up an independent competition agency.
PAULIS svarede, at der gjorde sig ganske særlige forhold gældende for den finansielle sektor, men at reglerne alligevel blev anvendt.
Mr Paulis replied that the financial sector was hallmarked by specific features and circumstances, but the rules were applied all the same.
Paulo Andrade
Andrade
Paulo Andrade
Attley
Paulo Andrade
Mr  Andrade
Paulo Andrade
Mr Andrade
Paulo Andrade
Mr Andrade Paulo
Paulo Andrade (formand for opfølgningsudvalget EU-Indien) nævnte, at rundbordsdialogen EU-Indien, som indledtes i begyndelsen af året, bidrager til at profilere EU i Indien.
Mr Andrade (President of the EU-India follow-up committee) reported that the EU-India round table which had been launched at the start of the year was helping to raise the profile of the EU in India.
Paulo Andrade (P - I)
Mr Andrade (P-I)
Paulo Andrade (P)
Mr Andrade (P)
Paulo Andrade (P-I)
Mr Andrade (P-I)
Paulo Andrade (P-I)
Mr Andrade (PT-I)
Paulo Andrade (P-I) (art. 54 - Manuel Cavaleiro Brandão)
(Rule 54 - Cavaleiro Brandão)
Paulo Andrade (PT-I)
Mr Andrade (PT-I)
Paulo Andrade - I
Mr Andrade - I
Paulo Andrade fremlagde følgende ændringsforslag til punkt 6.2.5.6.2:
Mr Andrade presented the following amendment to point 6.2.5.6.2:
Paulo Andrade henviste til Helmut Gieseckes generelle bemærkninger, som forelå skriftligt.
Mr Andrade mentioned the written general comments by Mr Giesecke.
Paulo Andrade kom ind på den seneste udvikling efter Rådets møde i Feira.
Mr Andrade looked at the recent developments which had taken place since the European Council in Feira.
Paulo Andrade kom særligt ind på to aspekter: forskningsudgifternes ringe andel af det samlede BNP i Middelhavspartnerlandene og det lave gennemsnitlige antal Internet-brugere i det sydlige Middelhavsområde.
He mentioned two aspects in particular:  the small proportion of GDP devoted to research in the Mediterranean partner countries and the generally low number of internet users in the southern Mediterranean.
Paulo ANDRADE læste i sin egenskab af formand for den forberedende kommission listen med kandidater til præsidiet op for forsamlingen.
Mr Andrade, president of the Election Panel, presented the list of candidatures for election to the bureau.
Paulo Andrade meddelte, at den forberedende kommission havde gennemgået kandidaturerne og konstateret, at de var i overensstemmelse med forretningsordenens bestemmelser.
Mr Andrade said that the election panel had examined the candidatures put forward and had checked that they complied with the Rules of Procedure.
Paulo ANDRADE mente, at tilsætning med sakkarose forringer produktets kvalitet, og at forbrugeren skal oplyses behørigt herom, når han køber vinen.
Mr ANDRADE felt that sucrose enrichment lowered the quality of the product and that the consumer should be informed that this method had been used when the wine was purchased.
Paulo Andrade og Bruno Vever
Mr Andrade and Mr Vever
Paulo Andrade påpegede, at de europæiske virksomheder befinder sig i et stærkt konkurrencepræget klima.
Mr Andrade pointed out that European firms were operating in a strongly competitive environment.
Paulo Andrade påpegede, at den forberedende kommission kun har til opgave at kontrollere, at kandidaturerne er i overensstemmelse med forretningsordenen, og spørgsmålet om ligebehandling er ikke nedfældet som betingelse i denne.
Mr Andrade pointed out that the election panel was only called on to check that the candidatures complied with the Rules of Procedure and that the question of gender equality was not covered by them.
Paulo Andrade stillede følgende ændringsforslag:
Mr Andrade submitted the following amendment:
Paulo Andrade takkede ordførerens for hans imødekommenhed under udarbejdelsen af udtalelsen i studiegruppen.
Mr Andrade thanked the rapporteur for the receptive spirit he had shown in drawing up the study group's opinion.
Paulo Andrade udtrykte en vis tvivl hvad angår henvisningen til lønomkostningerne pr. produceret enhed i Heinz Putzhammers udtalelse (i Irland er faldet i ledigheden blevet ledsaget af et fald i de reale lønomkostninger pr. produceret enhed).
Mr Andrade expressed some doubts concerning the reference to unit labour costs in Mr Putzhammer's opinion (in Ireland the reduction in unemployment had been accompanied by a fall in real unit labour costs).
Paulo Andrade understregede, at følgende grundlæggende problemer burde overvindes:
Mr Andrade pointed out the fundamental problems that had to be overcome:
Paulo Andrade var ikke sikker på, at CCMI havde fået tildelt tilstrækkeligt med budgetmidler til, at spørgsmål om industrielle ændringer uden for EU kunne behandles.
Mr Andrade queried whether the budget allocated to the CCIC ought to be used to deal with industrial change outside the EU.
Paulo Andrade var indforstået hermed.
Mr Andrade agreed with this.
Paulo ANDRADE var pessimistisk med hensyn til fremtidsudsigterne.
Mr Andrade was pessimistic about the outlook.
Paulo ANDRADE ønskede ordføreren tillykke med det veludførte arbejde.
Mr ANDRADE congratulated the Rapporteur on a fine piece of work.
Paulo Andrade, J. Ignacio Gafo Fernández, Johann Költringer, Peter Morgan og Paul Verhaeghe deltog i den generelle debat  om bl.a. investeringer og finansieringen af den fælles landbrugspolitik samt balancen mellem miljø og landbrug på lang sigt.
Mr Andrade, Mr Gafo Fernández, Mr Költringer, Mr Morgan and Mr Verhaeghe took part in the general discussion, which covered, inter alia, investment and CAP funding and the balance in the long term between the environment and agriculture.
Paulo Andrade, José María Espuny Moyano og Bernardo Hernández Bataller mente ikke, at de rådede over tilstrækkeligt med informationer til at kunne træffe en beslutning.
Mr Andrade, Mr Espuny Moyano and Mr Hernández Bataller considered that not enough information was available to reach a decision.
Paulo Andrade, Wilfried Beirnaert, Roy Donovan, P.L.H. Geraads, Johannes Kleemann, Peter Morgan, Irini Pari, Christa Schweng og Kenneth Walker deltog i den generelle debat.
The following members spoke in the general discussion: Mr Andrade, Mr Beirnaert, Mr Donovan, Mr Geraads, Mr Kleeman, Mr Morgan, Mrs Pari, Mrs Schweng and Mr Walker.
Paulo Andrade:
Mr Andrade
Paulo Barros Vale
Barros Vale
Paulo Barros Vale
Mr Barros Vale
Paulo Barros Vale
Mr Paulo Barros Vale
Paulo Barros Vale (Arbejdsgivergruppen – PT)
Paulo Barros Vale (Employers – PT)
Paulo Barros Vale (formand) (Art.
Mr BARROS VALE (President) (Rule 54
Paulo Barros Vale (I-P)
Mr Barros Vale (I-P)
Paulo Barros Vale (I-PT)
BARROS VALE (PT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (I-PT)
Mr Barros Vale (I-PT)
Paulo Barros Vale (Ordfører)
Barros Vale (Rapporteur)
Paulo Barros Vale (P - I)
Mr Barros Vale (P-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (P-I)
Mr Barros Vale (I-P)
Paulo Barros Vale (P-I)
Mr Barros Vale (P-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (P-I) (art. 54 – Manuel Cavaleiro Brandão)
Mr Barros Vale (P-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT-I)
Barros Vale (PT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT-I)
Mr         Barros Vale (PT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT-I)
Mr Barros Vale (IT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT-I)
Mr Barros Vale (PT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT-I)
Mr Barros Vale (PT–I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT–I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT-I) (Art.
BARROS VALE, Paulo (PT-I) (Art.
Paulo Barros Vale (PT-I) (art. 62 – Alberto Nadal)
Barros Vale, Paulo (PT-I) (Rule 62 - Nadal, Alberto)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT‑I)
Mr Barros Vale (PT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT–I)
Barros Vale (PT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT–I)
Mr Barros Vale (PT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (PT–I)
Mr Barros Vale (PT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale bekræftede det, som Jorge Pegado Liz havde fremført, og udtrykte sin støtte til ham.
Mr Barros Vale endorsed Mr Pegado Liz's comments.
Paulo Barros Vale foreslog en udtalelse, som skulle have til formål at anstille overvejelser over metoderne til tilvejebringelse af et bedre erhvervsklima i Europa.
Mr Barros Vale was in favour of drafting an opinion that would explore the means of creating a better climate for companies in Europe.
Paulo Barros Vale foreslog i egenskab af tidligere ordfører på udtalelsen om partnerskaber at tilføje repræsentanter for de nye medlemsstater i studiegrupperne om reform af strukturfondene frem for at udarbejde en ny initiativudtalelse.
Mr Barros Vale, in his capacity as the rapporteur for the previous opinion on partnership, suggested that it might be better to include representatives from the new Member States in the study groups working on the reform of the Structural Funds, rather than draft a new own-initiative opinion.
Paulo BARROS VALE foreslog, at Ettore MASUCCI og Giampaolo PELLARINI nåede til enighed.
Mr Barros Vale suggested that Mr Masucci and Mr Pellarini come to an agreement.
Paulo BARROS VALE forklarede, at han havde stemt hverken for eller imod, da han anså det for urealistisk, at man kunne gennemføre de foreslåede foranstaltninger.
Mr Barros Vale said that he had abstained because he felt that the measures proposed in the text were unrealistic.
Paulo Barros Vale fremlagde forslaget til udtalelse samt korrigendummet, hvoraf en del vil indgå som bilag.
Mr Barros Vale presented the draft opinion and of the corrigendum; part of the latter would be set out in an appendix.
Paulo Barros Vale introducerede kort udtalelsen om "Et partnerskab til gennemførelse af strukturfondene" (ECO/106), som han var ordfører på i 2003.
Mr Barros Vale gave a brief introduction to the opinion Partnership for implementing the Structural Funds (ECO 106), for which he had been rapporteur in 2003.
Paulo Barros Vale kommenterede det brev, som medlem af Kommissionen Chris Patten havde sendt ham vedrørende EU-programmet til støtte af investeringer mellem EU‑partnere og tredjelande.
Mr Barros Vale commented on the letter which Commissioner Patten had sent to him concerning the European support programme for investment between European and third country partners.
Paulo Barros Vale kunne fuldt tilslutte sig Enrico Kirschens bemærkninger.
In his reply, Mr Barros Vale fully endorsed the comments by Mr Kirschen.
Paulo Barros Vale meddelte ordføreren, at han ville afgive sine kommentarer skriftligt.
Mr Barros Vale informed the rapporteur that he would send his comments in writing.
Paulo Barros Vale mindede om, at der på mødet i juli på ny bør forelægges ØSU's præsidium en anmodning om tilladelse til udarbejdelse af en initiativudtalelse om Interreg.
Mr Barros Vale stressed the importance of resubmitting the request for an INTERREG own-initiative opinion to the ESC Bureau in July.
Paulo Barros Vale og Bruno Di Odoardo, henholdsvis ordfører og medordfører, fremlagde udtalelsen.
Mr Barros Vale and Mr di Odoardo, rapporteur and co-rapporteur, gave a presentation of the document.
Paulo Barros Vale og Georgios Dassis mente, at det var for tidligt at skride til afstemning, og at præsidiet ikke kunne udtale sig om en tekst, der ikke forelå i færdig form.
Mr Barros Vale and Mr Dassis believed that it was too early to call a vote and that the Bureau could only reach a decision on the basis of the finalised document.
Paulo Barros Vale repræsenterer ØSU
Mr Barros Vale will represent the Committee
Paulo Barros Vale satte spørgsmålstegn ved tilstedeværelsen af de øvrige institutioner ved præsidiets møder og bad om en præcisering af betingelserne for at afholde et møde for lukkede døre.
Mr Barros Vale enquired about the possibility of representatives of other institutions attending Bureau meetings, and suggested that the conditions under which closed meetings could be held should be set out more clearly.
Paulo Barros Vale stillede sig kritisk til de oplysninger, som det foreløbige forslag byggede på, og han fik opbakning fra János Vértes.
Mr Barros Vale was critical of the information which had been used to prepare the preliminary draft budget.
Paulo Barros Vale støttede Irini Paris forslag.
Mr Barros Vale supported Mrs Pari's standpoint.
Paulo BARROS VALE tvivlede på det hensigtsmæssige i at bevæge sig mod en fælles mønt, hvis det skal ske med den hast, som man er vidne til i øjeblikket.
Mr Barros Vale doubted the wisdom of proceeding towards a single currency at the pace currently being adopted.
Paulo BARROS VALE undrede sig over, at Kommissionen beskæftiger sig med emner af denne karakter og dermed koncentrerer sig om dyrenes velvære frem for menneskets sociale rettigheder.
Mr BARROS VALE expressed surprise that the Commission concerned itself with this type of issue and concentrated on animal welfare rather than giving priority to the social rights of human beings.
Paulo Barros Vale Vale (Gr.
Barros Vale (Gr.
Paulo Barros Vale var overrasket over priserne hos EØSU's rejsebureau og bad om at få gennemført en undersøgelse.
Mr Barros Vale was surprised at the high fees charged by the EESC travel agency and called for an audit.
Paulo Barros Vale ville fremlægge et forslag til initiativudtalelse om ”Evaluering af solidaritetsfondens principper og funktionsmåde og tilpasning til behovene i EU’s lande og regioner”.
Proposal to be presented by Mr Barros Vale on Assessment of the principles and operation of the Solidarity Fund and its appropriateness to the needs of the countries and regions of the European Union
Paulo Barros Vale, formand for studiegruppen, som havde udarbejdet forslaget til udtalelse, støttede ordføreren og anmodede forsamlingen om at stemme for forslaget.
Mr Barros Vale, president of the study group responsible for drawing up the draft opinion, supported the rapporteur and asked the Committee to vote in favour of the opinion.
Paulo Barros Vale, ordfører for udtalelsen om "Den Europæiske Unions Solidaritetsfond", mindede om de udtalelser, som EØSU tidligere havde afgivet om den nye generation af programmer under EU’s samhørighedspolitik efter 2007, og navnlig de klare forslag, som EØSU havde fremsat om inddragelse af arbejdsmarkedets parter på nationalt og lokalt niveau og om styrkelse af det offentlig-private partnerskab af hensyn til programmernes finansiering.
Mr Barros Vale, rapporteur for the opinion on the European Union Solidarity Fund, mentioned the content of the Committee opinions on the structure of the new-generation post-2007 cohesion policy and, in particular, the precise proposals made earlier by the EESC on the active participation of the social partners at national and local level, and on a strengthening of the public-private partnership for financing the programmes.
Paulo Barros Vale, ordfører, ECO-sektionen
Paulo Barros Vale, rapporteur, ECO Section
Paulo Braghin (IT-I) (art. 62 – Pezzini)
Mr Braghin (IT-I) (Rule 62 –Pezzini)
Paulo Fonseca (for ordføreren)
Mr Paulo Fonseca (for the rapporteur)
Paulo Fonseca (for ordføreren)
Paulo Fonseca (for the rapporteur)
Paulo Jorge Andrade
Andrade
Paulo Jorge Andrade
ANDRADE Paulo Jorge
Paulo Jorge Andrade (PT–I)
Mr ANDRADE (P-I)
Paulo Jorge Andrade (PT–I)
Mr Andrade (PT-I)
Paulo Jorge Andrade bemærkede, at henvisningen i punkt 1.1 til den forværrede situation ikke understøttes at kendsgerninger i rapporten.
Mr Andrade commented that the references in the report to the worsening situation regarding poverty had not been supported by facts in the report.
Paulo Jorge Andrade henledte opmærksomheden på, at EØSU kun delvist kunne afspejle civilsamfundet, og kom nærmere ind på fire aspekter, som var vigtige at tage stilling til, hvis EØSU skulle undgå at modsige sig selv: 1) hvordan kan EØSU favne alle disse forskellige synspunkter; 2) hvordan undgås risikoen for interessekonflikt med EFS og Unice; 3) på hvilket grundlag skal de organisationer, der skal indgå i kontaktgruppen, udvælges og 4) hvorvidt er der tale om horisontale organisationer, der samarbejder med arbejdsmarkedets parter.
Mr Andrade drew attention to the fact that the EESC could reflect civil society only partially and questioned four aspects, to avoid any risk that the Committee might contradict itself: 1) how all these points of view could be provided with a framework within the Committee; 2) how the risk of conflicts of interest with the ETUC and UNICE could be avoided; 3) what should be the criteria for selecting the organisations participating in the contact group and 4) whether these organisations were horizontal in nature and cooperated with the social partners.
Paulo Jorge Andrade talte imod denne ændring, som derefter blev sat under afstemning.
The amendment on indent 14 of the key points was put to a vote.
Paulo Jorge Andrade tilføjede, at det med henblik på at styrke beskæftigelsesmulighederne er nødvendigt først at skabe fred og stabilitet, hvilket ikke er nævnt I rapporten.
Mr Andrade added that in order to encourage employment opportunities it is necessary to first establish peace and stability, which has not be mentioned in the text.
Paulo Jorge Andrade vendte sig mod forslaget.
Mr Andrade spoke against.
Paulo Jorge Andrade, Peter Boldt, Dimitris Dimitriadis, Bernardo Hernández Bataller og Liina Carr mente, at det deltagerantallet var for højt i betragtning af hhv. 1) antallet af medlemmer, der reelt var interesserede i dette emne 2) EØSU's omkostninger i forbindelse med dette arrangement 3) det faktum, at spørgsmålet delvist var blevet behandlet i forbindelse med en høring i Barcelona, og 4) den manglende proportionalitet i forhold til andre lignende arrangementer, og præsidiet besluttede derfor at skære EØSU's deltagerantal ned fra 30 til 21.
Having considered the arguments made by Mr Andrade, Mr Boldt, Mr Dimitriadis, Mr Hernández Bataller and Ms Carr on, respectively, i) the number of members actually interested in the subject, ii) the cost of the event to the EESC, iii) the fact that the matter was partly dealt with at a hearing in Barcelona, and iv) the lack of fairness compared with similar events, the Bureau decided to reduce the number of EESC delegates from 30 to 21.
Paulo Moutinho Martins
Mr Paulo Moutinho Martins
Paulo Teixeira de Morais (for ordføreren)
Paulo Teixeira de Morais (for the rapporteur)
Paulo Teixeira de Morais (INT/593)
Teixeira de Morais, Paulo (INT/593)
Paulo Andrade gik imod ændringsforslaget.
Mr Andrade disagreed with the proposed amendment.
Paulo Barros Vale (P - I)
Mr Barros Vale (P-I)
Paulo Barros Vale (P-I)
Barros Vale (PT-I)
Paulo Barros Vale, formand
Mr Barros Vale, president
Paulo Jorge Andrade begrundede sit ændringsforslag med, at produktivitet allerede var defineret, og at en ny definition krævede, at man brugte en anden betegnelse.
Defending his amendments, Mr Andrade said that productivity was already defined and that a new definition required using a different term.
Paulo Jorge Andrade forsvarede sit forslag, da han ønskede, at der skulle tages hensyn til de økonomiske aspekter.
Defending his amendment, Mr Andrade wished to see economic aspects taken into account.
Paulo Jorge Andrade spurgte, hvorfor man behandlede et emne af økonomisk, social og miljømæssig art i Sektionen for Landbrug, Landdistrikterne og Miljø, og var uenig i anmodningen om at give sociale anliggender en mere fremtrædende plads.
Mr Andrade raised the question why a matter concerning economic, social and environmental matters was dealt with in the Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment and disagreed with the demand to give more prominence to social matters.
Paulo Jorge Andrade ville med sit ændringsforslag give udtryk for, at der lagdes for stor vægt på sociale aspekter.
Defending his amendment, Mr Andrade saw too much emphasis on social issues.