natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
John ANDREWS tilsluttede sig udtalelsen, men pegede på de modsætningsforhold mellem forskellige muligheder, der kan opstå, når det drejer sig om at forbedre livskvaliteten.
Mr ANDREWS seconded the remarks made by the previous speaker and went on to draw attention to the possible contradiction between a number of options from the point of view of improving the quality of life.
John Andrews understregede, at der i udtalelsen tages fat på en meget omfattende dagsorden.
Mr Andrews stressed that the opinion embraced a very big agenda.
John Andrews ville gerne vide, hvorfor man i punkt 3.3.1 havde valgt at tale om "haveredskaber" i stedet for at bruge et mere omfattende begreb.
Mr Andrews wanted to know why only "gardening equipment" was mentioned in point 3.3.1 and why a more comprehensive term had not been chosen.
John Andrews, som havde været medlem af studiegruppen, udtrykte tilfredshed med udtalelsen og bemærkede, at den skulle opfattes som et supplement til den næste udtalelse på dagsordenen.
Mr Andrews, who had been a member of the study group, praised the opinion and noted that it should be seen as complementary to the next opinion on the agenda.
John Atkins (for Gruppe II)
Mr John Atkins (Group II expert)
John B. SCICLUNA
Mr John B. Scicluna
John B. WALTON (for Gruppe I)
Mr John B. WALTON (for Group I)
John Baptist Scicluna, repræsentant for Maltas industrisammenslutning, kom ind på den udvikling, som havde ført hans land frem til et positivt udfald på folkeafstemningen om EU‑tiltrædelse.
Mr Scicluna, representing the federation of Maltese industries, spoke of how his country had arrived at a favourable result in the referendum on EU entry.
John Bryan (IE-III)
Mr Bryan (IE-III)
John Carr (for ordføreren)
John Carr (for the rapporteur)
John CARROLL
The Chairman
John CARROLL
The President
John CARROLL bød generaldirektør i GD I/A, Günther BURGHARDT, velkommen.
Mr Carroll welcomed Mr Burghardt, director-general of DG I/A at the European Commission.
John CARROLL gjorde rede for forhandlingerne i sektionen om denne udtalelse.
The section president, Mr Carroll, described the section's work on this matter.
John CARROLL informerede sektionens medlemmer om præsidiets drøftelser af spørgsmålet om opfølgningen af udtalelserne og ordførerens rolle samt koordineringen af sektionens og delegationernes aktiviteter.
Mr Carroll informed section members of the bureau's discussions on the follow-up to opinions and the role of the rapporteur, as well as on the coordination of section and delegation activities.
John CARROLL, Liam CONNELLAN og John FREEMAN foreslog at indføje et nyt pkt. 6, hvor det bliver påpeget, at Rådet har behandlet direktivforslaget tidligere end bebudet.
Mr CARROLL, Mr CONNELLAN and Mr FREEMAN proposed inserting a new point 6 referring to the fact that the Council had dealt with the draft Directive earlier than announced.
John Claxton gjorde kort rede for meddelelsen.
Mr Claxton gave a brief overview of the Communication.
John Corey
Mr John Corey
John Corey (IE-II)
Mr Corey (IE-II)
John Coyle
Mr John Coyle
John Dalli, kommissær med ansvar for sundhed og forbrugerpolitik: Forbrugerpolitik
John Dalli, Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy: consumer policy
John Dalli, medlem af Kommissionen med ansvar for sundhed og forbrugerpolitik
John Dalli, European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy
John Dalli, medlem af Kommissionen med ansvar for sundhed og forbrugerpolitik,
John Dalli, European Commissioner responsible for Health and Consumer Policy,
John Dalli, medlem af Kommissionen med ansvar for sundhed og forbrugerpolitik: sundheds- og forbrugerproblematikker
John Dalli, European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy: health and consumption issues
John Dennis Kuipers var medlem af ØSU fra 1962-1974, formand for ØSU fra 1970‑1972 og medlem af ØSU's præsidium fra 1964-1970.
Mr Kuipers had been a member of the Economic and Social Committee between 1962 and 1974, ESC president between 1970 and 1972, and ESC Bureau member between 1964 and 1970.
John Dillon mindede om, at mange irske landmænd faktisk var forpagtere eller lejere.
Mr Dillon pointed out that many Irish farmers were in fact leaseholders or tenants.
John Dillon understregede, at der i Europa allerede findes dyrevelfærdsnormer, og at de er de højeste i verden; problemet opstår i forholdet til tredjelande, som har lavere normer og ingen sporbarhed, og man burde derfor kræve af dem, at de hæver deres normer til samme niveau som det europæiske.
Mr Dillon underlined that in Europe animal welfare standards are already in place and are the highest in the world; the problem, he said, is with third countries, which have lower standards and no traceability, and should therefore be required to raise their standards to the same level as the European.
John Donelly præsenterede forslaget til udtalelse på Ann Davisons vegne.
Mr Donnelly presented the draft opinion on behalf of Mrs Davison.
John Donnelly
DONELLY
John Donnelly
Donnelly
John Donnelly
Donnely
John Donnelly
Mr Donnelly
John Donnelly
Mr John Donnelly
John Donnelly  (art. 62, for Carlos Ribeiro)
Donnelly (Rule 62 Ribeiro)
John Donnelly (art. 54 for Dario Mengozzi) (III - IRL)
Mr Donnelly (Rule 54 - Mr Mengozzi) (III-IRL)
John Donnelly (formand)
DONNELLY - President
John Donnelly (Gr.
J. Donnelly (Gr.
John Donnelly (IE-III)
Donnelly (IE-III)
John Donnelly (IE-III)
Donnelly (IRL-III)
John Donnelly (IE-III)
Mr Donnelly (IE – III)
John Donnelly (IE-III)
Mr Donnelly (IE-III)
John Donnelly (IE-III) (for Lucia Fusco, art. 62)
Donnelly (IE-III) (Rule 62-Fusco)
John Donnelly (IE-III) (for Lucia Fusco, art. 62)
Mr Donnelly (IE-III) (Rule 62-Fusco)
John Donnelly (IE‑III) (Art.
Donnelly (IE-III)
John Donnelly (IE‑III) (Art.
Donnelly (IE-III) (Rule 62- Ribeiro)
John Donnelly (III)
Mr DONNELLY (III)
John Donnelly (III-IE)
Mr Donnelly (III-IE)
John Donnelly (III-IRL)
Mr Donnelly (III-IRL)
John Donnelly (IRL - III)
Mr Donnelly (IRL - III)
John Donnelly (IRL - III)
Mr Donnelly (IRL-III)
John Donnelly (IRL)
Mr Donnelly (IRL)
John Donnelly (IRL-III)
Mr Donnelly (III-IRL)
John Donnelly (IRL-III)
Mr DONNELLY (IRL-III)
John Donnelly (IRL-III) (for Jan Olsson, art. 54)
Mr Donnelly (IRL-III) (Rule 54 - Mr Olsson)
John Donnelly (IRL‑III) (for Jan Olsson art.62)
Mr Donnelly (IRL-III) (Rule 62 - Olsson)
John Donnelly (ordfører)
Mr Donnelly (rapporteur)
John Donnelly - III
Mr Donnelly - III
John Donnelly beklagede, at producenterne ikke havde nogen form for videre kontrol og sikkerhed i forhold til de efterfølgende markedsaktører såsom slagterier, supermarkeder osv.
Mr Donnelly felt that it was regrettable that the producer could exercise no control over, and had no certainty with regard to, downstream market participants, such as abattoirs, supermarkets etc.
John Donnelly foreslog at omformulere pkt. 2.4 for at gøre det mere tydeligt.
Mr Donnelly suggested redrafting point 2.4 of the text for clarification purposes.
John Donnelly foreslog, at man ændrede rapportens struktur, og at man flyttede resuméet hen sidst i dokumentet.
Mr Donnelly proposed changing the structure of the report and putting the summary at the end.
John Donnelly foreslog, at udtrykket "stable to table" i de sprogversioner, hvor det var relevant, ændredes til "farm to fork".
Mr Donnelly proposed to modify the expression “stable to table” into “farm to fork”.
John Donnelly fremlagde udtalelsen og udtrykte i den forbindelse støtte til princippet om konsolidering af bestemmelserne for indførsel af levende dyr.
Mr Donnelly presented the opinion expressing his support for the concept of consolidating the rules governing the import of live animals.
John Donnelly gav udtryk for vilje til at godkende de to fremlagte ændringsforslag, da sigtet var at belyse nogle ansvarlighedsspørgsmål.
Mr Donnelly expressed his willingness to endorse the two amendments proposed as they aim to clarify certain liability questions.
John Donnelly indledte med at orientere om sektorens beskatningsmæssige problemer i Irland.
Mr Donnelly started by explaining the tax problems of this sector in Ireland.
John Donnelly mente, at der kunne være en modsigelse i punkt 3.5 (aldersgrænse).
Mr Donnelly noted some possible contradiction in point 3.5 (age limit).
John Donnelly om behovet for at lære af fortidens fejl.
Mr Donnelly on the lessons to be drawn from past mistakes.
John Donnelly roste ordføreren, fordi det var lykkedes ham at give udtryk for flertallets syn på dette komplekse og kontroversielle spørgsmål.
Mr Donnelly congratulated the rapporteur on managing to reflect the majority view on this complex and controversial issue.
John Donnelly sagde, at Polen havde brug for megen hjælp og tid til at forberede tiltrædelsen.
Mr Donnelly underlined that Poland was in need of a great deal of assistance and time in order to prepare for accession.
John Donnelly støttede Adrien Bedossas forslag og tilføjede, at det mislykkede første forsøg på at få Nice-traktaten ratificeret i Irland havde gjort irerne mere aktive i forbindelse med kommunikation om europæiske anliggender, hvilket især skyldes inddragelse af de irske samfunds bærende kræfter.
Mr Donnelly agreed with Mr Bedossa and added that the first unsuccessful attempt at ratifying the Nice Treaty in Ireland had given the Irish the opportunity to engage more actively in communicating European affairs, mainly due to the involvement of all the country’s stakeholders.
John Donnelly talte især om de unge landmænd, som måtte gives stabile rammevilkår.
Mr Donnelly spoke in particular about young farmers, who ought to be provided with stable framework conditions.
John Donnelly udtrykte bekymring for landbruget og efterlyste flere særmidler til landdistrikterne.
Mr Donnelly explained his concern as regards the agricultural sector and called for more special funds for rural areas.
John Donnelly understregede betydningen af at bevare landbruget som den bærende struktur i ethvert projekt om udvikling af landdistrikterne og komplimenterede ligeledes ordføreren for hans gode udtalelse.
Mr Donnelly stressed the need to maintain farming as the cornerstone of every rural development project and joined in congratulating the rapporteur on his excellent opinion.
John Donnelly understregede betydningen af sit ændringsforslag til punkt 2.5.4.
Mr Donnelly stressed the importance of the amendment he proposed to point 2.5.4.
John Donnelly ønskede, at man i punkt 2.4 specifikt nævnte bidraget fra mindre bedrifter - baseret på landbrugsprodukter.
Mr Donnelly wanted a specific reference of the potential contribution of small agricultural based industries in point 2.4.
John Donnelly, formand
Mr Donelly president
John Donnelly, som anså udtalelsen for fortrinlig, fremsatte betragtninger om akvakulturens indvirkning på turismen og det traditionelle fiskeri.
He made some further comments on the impact of aquaculture on tourism and on traditional fishing.
John Donnelly: finansieringen og de blandede rådgivende udvalgs uafhængighed;
Mr Donnelly: on the financing and independence of the JCCs.
John Donnellys kommentarer til punkt 2.4 og 5.4 ville ordføreren forsøge at indarbejde i teksten.
He would try to work Mr Donnelly's comments on points 2.4 and 5.4 into the opinion.
John Evans (UK-I)
Mr Evans (UK-I)
John Evans mente, at udtalelsen på nogle punkter burde være klarere og mere specifik, og at den flere steder var holdt i for generelle vendinger.
Mr Evans expressed the view that the opinion could be clearer and more specific on a number of points and that in some places it was too general.
John Evans, generalsekretær for "Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD" (TUAC)
John Evans, General Secretary of the Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD (TUAC)
John F. BACHTLER (UK) (for ordføreren LITTLE)
Mr John F. Bachtler (UK) (for the rapporteur Mr Little)
John F. CARROLL
:  Mr   CARROLL
John F. Carroll
Carroll
John F. Carroll
Gourmelon
John F. Carroll
Mr Carroll
John F. CARROLL
Mr JOHN F. CARROLL
John F. CARROLL
The Chairman
John F. CARROLL
The President
John F. CARROLL
The President,
John F. Carroll (Gr.
Mr Carroll (Gr.
John F. Carroll *
Carroll
John F. Carroll blev valgt til ny formand for sektionen.
Mr John Carroll was elected as the new section president.
John F. CARROLL gjorde rede for forløbet af arbejdet i studiegruppen og i sektionen og bad FORMANDEN give ordet til ordfører Gianni VINAY.
Mr CARROLL outlined the work done by the Section and Study Group, and invited the President to give the floor to the Rapporteur.
John F. Carroll præsenterede udtalelsen og gjorde opmærksom på, at den var blevet diskuteret indgående på sektionsmødet.
Mr Carroll introduced the opinion, and said that it had been discussed in detail at the section meeting.
John F. CARROLL redegjorde for sektionens og studiegruppens arbejde med sagen og lagde især vægt på den brede enighed, man var nået frem til.
Mr CARROLL described the work of the Section and Study Group on the subject, stressing the broad consensus that had been achieved.
John F. Carroll var ikke enig med ordføreren på dette punkt.
Mr Carroll expressed disagreement with the views of the rapporteur on this point.
John F. Carroll*
Carroll
John F. CARROLL, formand for Sektionen for EU's Eksterne Forbindelser, Handels- og Udviklingspolitik,  redegjorde for sektionens arbejde med denne vigtige sag og understregede, at formålet med udvidelsen af EU bør være en forbedring af samtlige EU-borgeres levevilkår, herunder de økonomiske, sociale og kulturelle vilkår.
The president of the Section for External Relations, Trade and Development Policy, Mr Carroll, outlined the section's work on this important dossier, and said that the aim of EU enlargement should be to improve living conditions for all European citizens from the economic, social and cultural point of view.
John F. CARROLL, formand for Socialsektionen, gennemgik kort Kommissionens forslag og understregede, at det supplerer  tidligere direktiver om fri bevægelighed for varer og direktiv 94/9/EF om eksplosionsfarlig atmosfære.
Mr CARROLL, Chairman of the Social Section, gave a brief overview of the Commission proposal and pointed out that it complemented previous Directives on the free movement of goods and of Directive 94/9/EC on explosive atmospheres.
John F. Carroll, Francis J. Whitworth og Georgios Sklavounos takkede varmt H.C.H van den Burg for hendes fremragende indsats.
Along with Mr Whitworth and Mr Sklavounos, he warmly thanked Mrs van den Burg for her sterling work.
John F. Carroll, som havde været studiegruppeformand, takkede ordføreren og eksperterne, fordi de havde anlagt en menneskelig indfaldsvinkel til dette tekniske spørgsmål.
Mr Carroll, who had been chairman of the study group, congratulated the rapporteur and the experts for maintaining a human approach to this technical subject.
John Feely House
Upper Mallow Street,
John Fish, President
Mr John Fish, President
John Freeman
Freeman
John Freeman (IRL-II)
Mr Freeman (IRL-II)
John Freeman nævnte i denne forbindelse, at det faldende pesticidforbrug dels er et succesrigt resultat af den førte politik, dels kan tilskrives den øgede bevidsthed blandt landmændene.
Mr Freeman also thought that the fall in the use of pesticides was due partly to the policy adopted and partly to farmers' growing awareness.
John GOODALL (for Gruppe I)
Mr John Goodall (Group I expert)
John Hegarty
Mr John Hegarty
John Hopkins-undersøgelsen er indtil videre den eneste, der kan danne grundlag for internationale sammenligninger; trods kritik af detaljer er den videnskabeligt anerkendt og citeres også nu og da af Kommissionen, således f.eks. i "Meddelelse fra Kommissionen om fremme af foreninger og fonde i Europa" (KOM(97) 241 endelig udg.).
The Johns Hopkins survey is the only survey carried out to date which permits comparisons to be made at international level; despite criticisms relating to detailed aspects of the survey, the fact remains that it has been scientifically recognized and has been quoted by the Commission when appropriate, such as in the communication from the Commission on the promotion of the role of non-profit associations and foundations in Europe (COM(97) 241 final).
John Hopkins-undersøgelsen er mere udtømmende og tematisk langt finere struktureret end Kommissionens undersøgelse.
By contrast, the Johns Hopkins' survey is more complete and classified by subject to a much more accurate degree.
John J. Vaughan (for Gruppe II)
Mr John J. Vaughan (for Group II)
John KENNA (for Gruppe I)
Mr John KENNA (Group I)
John Liska (Gr.
Mr Liska (Gr.
John Little
Little
John Little
Mr Little
John Little
Mr Little
John LITTLE
The President
John Little (art. 54 - Clare Carroll)
Mr Little (Rule 54 - Mrs Carroll)
John Little (art. 54 Kenneth Walker), Sergio Santillán Cabeza
Mr Little (Rule 54 - Mr Walker), Mr Santillan
John Little (fuldmagt fra Manuel Cavaleiro Brandão)
Little (proxy for Cavaleiro Brandão)
John Little (Gr.
Mr Little (Gr.
John Little (I-UK)
Little (UK-I)
John Little (UK)
Mr Little (UK)
John Little (UK-I)
I - UK)
John Little (UK-I)
John Little (I-UK)
John Little (UK-I)
Mr Little (UK-I)
John Little (UK-I)
Mr Little (UK-I)
John Little (UK-I) (art. 54 - Kenneth Walker)
Mr Little (Rule 54 for Mr Walker) (UK-I)
John Little advarede altså mod den risiko, der lå i at give dokumentet en politisk karakter, idet han mente, at EØSU stadig ville have tid nok til efter mødet den 24.-25. juni at beslutte, hvilke tiltag EØSU skulle iværksætte.
Mr Little therefore warned against producing a political document and considered that the Committee would still have enough time after the meeting on 24 and 25 June to decide what steps to take.
John Little anerkendte de bestræbelser, der var udfoldet for at nå til enighed, men fandt, at udtalelsen var selvmodsigende, når charteret både skulle være juridisk bindende og inkorporeres i traktaten, men ikke ændre ved nugældende kompetencer.
Mr Little, recognised the efforts that had been made to find common ground, but considered the Opinion to be contradictory in its inference that the Charter should be legally binding and in the Treaty without changing current competences.
John Little anførte på vegne af Arbejdsgivergruppen, at formanden havde gjort en effektiv indsats, der i betydelig grad havde styrket EØSU's image i Europa.
On behalf of the Employers' Group, Mr Little stressed how effective the president's work had been in significantly strengthening the image of the EESC in Europe.
John Little bad om, at punkt 14 på dagsordenen, nemlig udtalelsen SOC/25 om "Beskyttelse af fysiske personer i forbindelse med behandling af personoplysninger" blev taget af dagsordenen.
Mr Little asked for Item 14, relating to opinion SOC/025 on the Protection of individuals/processing of personal data, to be removed from the agenda.
John Little bad ordføreren om at tydeliggøre, om hans forslag til udtalelse støttede fastholdelsen af princippet om kontraktmæssig frihed, eller om han i punkt 4.2.1 lagde op til en maksimal betalingsfrist for alle kontrakter, hvilket kunne blive problematisk i tilfælde af kontrakter med etapevise betalinger.
Mr Little asked the rapporteur to clarify whether his draft opinion supported maintaining the principle of contractual freedom, or whether in point 4.2.1 he was suggesting a maximum payment period for all contracts, which could be problematic in the case of contracts with staged payments.
John LITTLE beklagede, at man ikke har gjort mere ud af at præsentere og strukturere teksten på et tidspunkt, hvor der bliver lagt pres på Kommissionen og Rådet, for at de skal tage større hensyn til ØSU's udtalelser.
Mr LITTLE expressed regret that at a time when the Commission and Council were being lobbied to take more account of Committee Opinions, more effort had not been made to improve the presentation and structure of the proposed text.
John LITTLE bekræftede dette, og ændringsforslagene blev vedtaget.
This was confirmed by Mr LITTLE and the amendment was accepted.
John LITTLE bifaldt Kommissionens meddelelse og fremhævede, at den havde valgt det rigtige udgangspunkt for en europæisk industripolitik.
Mr LITTLE welcomed the Commission's Communication and thought that the approach selected therein for a European industrial policy was the right one.
John Little bifaldt udtalelsens formål.
Mr Little supported the aims of the opinion.
John Little delte Anne-Marie Sigmunds bekymring.
Mr Little shared Ms Sigmund's concerns.
John Little efterlyste en definition af "budgetuligevægt" i selve punkt 5 eller i en fodnote.
Mr Little suggested adding a definition:
John LITTLE fastslog, at målet om økonomisk og social samhørighed ganske vist er indskrevet, men ikke defineret i Traktaten vedrørende Den Politiske Union.
Mr LITTLE pointed out that although the Treaty on Political Union enshrined the goal of economic and social cohesion, it gave no definition of it.
John Little foreslog andet punktum erstattet af følgende tekst:
Mr Little proposed to replace the second sentence by:
John LITTLE foreslog at affatte første punktum i pkt. 2.8. således.
Mr LITTLE proposed amending the first sentence of paragraph 2.8.
John LITTLE foreslog at lade pkt. 4.1.1. udgå.
Mr LITTLE proposed replacing point 4.1.1.
John LITTLE foreslog at lade pkt. 4.4 udgå og at tilføje et nyt pkt. 4.4.1 med følgende ordlyd:
Mr Little proposed to delete the first sentence of point 4.4 and to add a new point 4.4.1 reading as follows:
John Little foreslog følgende tilføjelse:
Mr Little suggested adding a sentence as follows:
John Little foreslog som et kompromis, at ændringsforslaget skulle henvise til direktivets artikel 8, litra c), og dette blev accepteret af ordføreren og derefter af forsamlingen.
Mr Little proposed a compromise, viz. that the proposed amendment should refer to Article 8 c) of the directive; this compromise was accepted by the rapporteur and then by the Committee.
John LITTLE foreslog, at pkt. 4.3.3. affattes således:
Mr LITTLE proposed that the following be deleted from point 4.3.3.:
John LITTLE foreslog, at punkt 11.4.4. udgår.
Mr LITTLE proposed deleting 11.4.4.
John Little fremhævede ligeledes betydningen af kommunikationspolitikken, som burde styrkes.
Mr Little also stressed the importance of the communication policy, which should be strengthened.
John Little fremsatte et ændringsforslag til pkt 5.1.
Mr Little presented an amendment to point 5.1.
John LITTLE fremsatte følgende ændringsforslag til punkt 4.8.:
Mr LITTLE proposed the following amendment to point 4.8.
John LITTLE gav en mundtlig redegørelse for udtalelsen.
The Rapporteur was Mr LITTLE.
John Little gav udtryk for den opfattelse, at information og høring af arbejdstagerne er almindeligt anerkendt og i grunden ikke noget kontroversielt emne.
Mr Little was convinced that informing and consulting workers was generally accepted and not in dispute as a principle.
John Little gav udtryk for helhjertet støtte til ordførerens fortrinlige udtalelse.
Mr Little expressed his wholehearted support for the rapporteur's excellent opinion.
John LITTLE gik imod det.
and Mr LITTLE opposed it.
John LITTLE gik imod det.
which Mr LITTLE opposed.
John Little gik imod ændringsforslag med samme begrundelse som ovennævnte.
Mr Little opposed the amendment, on the same grounds expressed before.
John Little gik imod ændringsforslaget med den begrundelse, at dette aspekt allerede var dækket andre steder i udtalelsen.
Mr Little spoke against, explaining that this concern was already covered in other points of the Opinion.
John Little gik imod ændringsforslaget.
Mr Little opposed this amendment.
John Little gjorde opmærksom på, at ingen i Socialsektionen havde stemt imod udtalelsen, selvom debatten havde været overraskende livlig.
Mr Little also pointed out that no Section members had voted against the opinion, even though the debate had been exceptionally lively.
John Little gjorde Roger Briesch opmærksom på, at han heller ikke havde haft mulighed for at møde repræsentanterne.
Mr Little informed Mr Briesch that he had experienced the same difficulty in meeting representatives.
John Little godkendte forslaget.
Mr Little accepted this proposal.