natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jorge Pegado Liz (III–PT)
Pegado Liz (III–PT)
Jorge Pegado Liz (Ordfører)
Mr Pegado Liz (rapporteur)
Jorge Pegado Liz (P-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT - III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT – III)
Mr Pegado Liz (III-PT)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT – III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT – III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT – III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-Gr.
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-Gr.
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-Gr.
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-GRIII)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-Gr.
Pegado Liz (PT – Gr.
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (III-PT)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (III-PT)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (III–PT)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT - III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT -III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT – III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-GRIII)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT–III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (III-PT)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Pegado Liz (III–PT)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III) (artikel 62 – Wolf (DE-III))
Mr Pegado Liz (Rule 62 – Wolf) (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT/III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT‑III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT‑III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT-III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT‑III)
Pegado Liz (PT‑III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (PT–III)
Mr Pegado Liz (PT–III)
Jorge Pegado Liz (P–III)
Mr Pegado Liz
Jorge Pegado Liz - pt
Mr Pegado Liz - PT
Jorge Pegado Liz anførte, at udvalget på grund af de 10 måneder, der er gået fra hans anmodning om at udarbejde en initiativudtalelse om "kollektive søgsmål" til nedsættelsen af studiegruppen, er gået glip af en glimrende lejlighed til at gøre sig synlig og gå forud på dette område, da kommissær Meglena Kuneva lige har bebudet, at hun agter at behandle dette spørgsmål.
Mr Pegado Liz said that the ten-month delay between his request to draw up an own-initiative opinion on collective actions and the setting-up of the study group had caused the Committee to lose an excellent opportunity to raise the profile of its work and to anticipate policy in this area, since Commissioner Kuneva had just announced that she intended to take up this issue.
Jorge Pegado Liz anså borgerinitiativet for Lissabontraktatens største fornyelse.
Mr Pegado Liz considered the citizens' initiative the most important innovation of the Lisbon Treaty.
Jorge Pegado Liz begrundede sit ønske om en omskrivning af punkt 3 og lagde vægt på det forhold, at Kommissionens fremgangsmåde var juridisk konsekvent.
Mr PEGADO LIZ explained his reasons for wanting point 3 to be reworded and stressed that the Commission's methodology was based on a legal approach;
Jorge Pegado Liz beklagede, at de gode intensioner i Kommissionens forslag ikke afspejlede sagens kerne.
Mr Pegado Liz  regretted that the good intentions of the Commission proposal did not reflect the essence of the subject.
Jorge Pegado Liz forsikrede Viviane Reding om, at Kommissionen kan regne med EØSU's opbakning, især hvad angår udarbejdelse af sonderende udtalelser.
He assured her that the Commission could count on the Committee, particularly when it came to drawing up exploratory opinions.
Jorge Pegado Liz fremhævede det ansvar, som tilkom medlemsstaterne for gennemførelsen af et indre marked for borgerne.
Mr Pegado Liz emphasised the responsibilities of the Member States with regard to the implementation of the Single Market for citizens.
Jorge Pegado Liz fremlagde arbejdsprogrammet for Den Rådgivende Kommission for Industrielle Ændringer (CCMI) for 2013.
Mr Pegado Liz presented the 2013 work programme of the Consultative Committee on Industrial Change (CCMI) to the Bureau.
Jorge Pegado Liz fremlagde arbejdsprogrammet for Den Rådgivende Kommission for Industrielle Ændringer (CCMI) for 2013.
Mr Pegado Liz presented the Consultative Commission on Industrial Change (CCMI) 2013 work programme to the Bureau.
Jorge Pegado Liz fremlagde forslag til tilføjelser til teksten (nyt punkt 3.5, 3.6 og 3.7) med omnummereringer, hvilke blev godkendt af sektionens ordfører; han foreslog en ændring til punkt 4, hvilken blev godkendt i en kompromisversion efter indsigelse af Göran Lagerholm.
Mr Pegado Liz presented proposed additions to the text (new points 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7), with renumbering, which was accepted by the rapporteur and the section; he proposed an amendment to point 4, which was accepted in a compromise version, following the opposition of Mr Lagerholm.
Jorge Pegado Liz fremlagde sit ændringsforslag, som gik ud på at ændre formandens beføjelser (stk. 1) samt karakteren af de opgaver, som han kan overdrage til generalsekretæren (stk. 3).
Mr Pegado Liz presented his amendment, which was intended to change the definition of the Committee president's powers (para. 1) and the nature of the tasks that he could entrust to the secretary-general (para. 3).
Jorge Pegado Liz fremlagde udtalelsen.
Mr Pegado Liz presented the opinion.
Jorge Pegado Liz fremsatte følgende ændringsforslag (ændringsforslag 1):
Mr Pegado Liz proposed the following amendment (amendment 1):
Jorge Pegado Liz fremsatte følgende ændringsforslag (ændringsforslag 2):
Mr Pegado Liz proposed the following amendment (amendment 2):
Jorge Pegado Liz fremsatte følgende ændringsforslag:
Mr Pegado Liz submitted the following amendments:
Jorge Pegado Liz gav udtryk for sin tilfredshed og kom ind på reklamens påvirkning af unge og børn, hvilket var emnet for hans egen initiativudtalelse og en offentlig høring den 1. december 2011.
Mr Pegado Liz expressed his satisfaction and referred to the influence of advertising on young people and children, which is the subject of his own-initiative opinion and a public hearing organised on 1 December 2011.
Jorge Pegado Liz havde fremsat to ændringsforslag til ændring af punkt 1.1 og punkt 1.3 som følger:
Mr Pegado Liz had tabled two amendments to modify points 1.1 and 3.1 as follows:
Jorge Pegado Liz havde spørgsmål til Kommissionens planlagte initiativer i forbindelse med problemet med kollektive søgsmål inden for forbrugerbeskyttelsen samt til den innoverende karakter ved begrebet "intelligent regulering".
Mr Pegado Liz enquired as to what measures were planned by the Commission on the issue of collective redress in the area of consumer protection, and wondered about the innovative nature of smart regulation.
Jorge Pegado Liz henvendte sig til formanden og bad på baggrund af de ønsker, der for nylig var blevet fremsat af budgetgruppen, om, at CCMI's aktiviteter gøres til genstand for en politisk debat på et af de kommende præsidiemøder.
Mr Pegado Liz asked the president if, following the wishes expressed recently by the budget group, the activity of the CCMI would be the subject of a policy debate at one of the Bureau's forthcoming meetings.
Jorge Pegado Liz lykønskede ordførerne og var enig med Joost van Iersel i, at udvalgets hjælpestrukturer bør udnyttes.
Mr Pegado Liz congratulated the rapporteurs and concurred with Mr van Iersel’s comments regarding the use of support structures of the Committee.
Jorge Pegado Liz medgav, at hans udlægning af teksten dog er temmelig kompleks som følge af traktatens komplicerede karakter.
Mr Pegado Liz recognised that his interpretation was still complex in view of the treaty's extreme degree of sophistication.
Jorge Pegado Liz mente, at de seks anmodninger om sonderende udtalelser kunne have været behandlet anderledes, eftersom EØSU allerede har afgivet adskillige udtalelser om de pågældende emner.
Mr Pegado Liz considered that the six exploratory referrals could have been handled differently given that the EESC had already adopted several opinions on the subjects concerned.
Jorge Pegado Liz mente, at der efter 25 år med et indre marked var behov for at foretage en revision.
Mr Pegado Liz felt it was essential to do this work at a time when the single market was 25 years old.
Jorge Pegado Liz og André Mordant udtrykte derefter deres oprigtige anerkendelse af ordførerens arbejde og opfordrede medlemmerne til at stemme massivt for denne udtalelse.
The floor was then taken by Mr Pegado Liz and Mr Mordant who both warmly congratulated the rapporteur and invited the members to vote "en masse" in favour of this opinion.
Jorge Pegado Liz og Armin Duttine tog derpå ordet og kom ind på følgende spørgsmål:
Mr Pegado Liz and Mr Duttine took the floor to raise the following points:
Jorge Pegado Liz og Dumitru Fornea talte under den generelle debat.
Mr Pegado Liz and Mr Fornea spoke in the general discussion.
Jorge Pegado Liz og Poul Lüneborg tog ordet under den efterfølgende generelle debat.
During the general debate that followed, Mr Pegado Liz and Mr Lüneborg intervened.
Jorge Pegado Liz omtalte de positive erfaringer og resultaterne i de to et halvt år, han har været formand.
Mr Pegado Liz discussed the positive experiences and achievements of his two and a half years of chairing the CCMI.
Jorge Pegado Liz omtalte hindringerne i det indre marked og bemærkede, at hindringerne var taget til i antal i de seneste år.
Mr Pegado Liz mentioned the barriers in the single market and said that they had only grown in number in recent years.
Jorge Pegado Liz præsenterede informationsrapporten og takkede for de gode bidrag fra medlemmerne af Markedsobservatoriet samt hans ekspert, Veronique Chappelarts eksemplariske engagement.
Mr Pegado Liz presented his information report and thanked the members of the Single Market Observatory for their enlightened contributions and his expert, Ms Véronique Chappelart, for her exemplary commitment.
Jorge Pegado Liz præsenterede udtalelsen og understregede betydningen af den offentlige høring, studiegruppen havde afholdt, og de mange svar fra de berørte organisationer på de tilsendte spørgeskemaer.
Mr Pegado Liz presented the draft opinion, emphasising the importance of the public hearing held by the study group and of the numerous responses by the organisations concerned to the questionnaires sent out.
Jorge Pegado Liz rejste spørgsmålet om samarbejde med TEN-sektionen, som nu hører under direktorat B.
Mr Pegado Liz raised the issue of cooperation with the TEN section, which was now part of Directorate B.
Jorge Pegado Liz roste ordføreren og Kommissionen for det udførte arbejde.
Mr Pegado Liz congratulated the rapporteur, and also the Commission, for their work.
Jorge Pegado Liz sagde, at han havde stemt imod udtalelsen for at protestere mod sektionens tilrettelæggelse af arbejdet, som ikke havde givet tid til at analysere dokumenterne.
Mr Pegado Liz declared that he had voted against the opinion in protest at the organisation of section work, which did not allow sufficient time to analyse the documents for discussion.
Jorge Pegado Liz sagde, at hans ændringsforslag havde til formål at tydeliggøre formuleringen.
Mr Pegado Liz explained that his amendments were intended to improve the clarity of the text.
Jorge Pegado Liz støttede forslaget til udtalelse.
Mr Pegado Liz supported the draft opinion.
Jorge Pegado Liz støttede ordføreren i hans betænkelighed ved Kommissionens forslag og mente, at det ændringsforslag, han havde stillet, ville gøre udtalelsen mere afbalanceret.
Mr Pegado Liz endorsed the rapporteur's concerns over the Commission's proposals and thought that the proposed amendment would make for a more balanced opinion.
Jorge Pegado Liz støttede ordførerens dokument, men havde gerne set, at han var gået endnu længere.
Mr Pegado Liz supported the rapporteur's document, but would have liked it to go further.
Jorge Pegado Liz støttede udtalelsen.
Mr Pegado Liz expressed his support to the opinion.
Jorge Pegado Liz takkede ordføreren for det kompromis, man var nået frem til, og påpegede farerne ved reklamers manipulation af børn.
Mr Pegado Liz thanked the rapporteur for the compromises that had been reached and pointed out the dangers of children being manipulated by advertising.
Jorge Pegado Liz tilføjede, at sektionens vedtagelse af ændringsforslagene havde fjernet en del af sammenhængen i teksten og bad om, at der blev rettet op herpå.
Mr Pegado Liz added that the amendments adopted by the section had made the text partially inconsistent and asked for this to be corrected.
Jorge Pegado Liz tog derefter ordet og understregede, at det er vigtigt, at forbrugerne bliver hørt.
Mr Pegado Liz then took the floor to stress that it is important for consumers' voice to be heard.
Jorge Pegado Liz tog ordet om arbejdets rækkefølge.
Mr Pegado Liz commented on the order of business.
Jorge Pegado Liz tog ordet under den efterfølgende debat for at bemærke, at Kommissionens forslag ikke levner borgerne nogen mulighed for at deltage direkte i det europæiske retlige netværk.
Mr Pegado Liz participated in the ensuing debate to comment the fact that, in the Commission's proposal, the citizen's direct participation in the European Judicial Network is excluded.
Jorge Pegado Liz tog ordet under den generelle debat for at udtrykke sin støtte til den velafbalancerede udtalelse.
Mr Pegado Liz took the floor in the ensuing general debate to express his support for this well-balanced opinion.
Jorge Pegado Liz tog ordet, og derefter Etele Baráth, som mente, at teksten burde foretage et klarere valg mellem udvalgets forskellige indsatsområder for at maksimere den merværdi, som arbejdet tilfører.
Following comments by Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Baráth stated that the text should have prioritised the Committee's areas of action more clearly in order to highlight the added value of its work.
Jorge Pegado Liz trak sit skriftligt fremlagte ændringsforslag tilbage.
Mr Pegado Liz withdrew his written amendment.
Jorge Pegado Liz var imod kompromisændringsforslaget, der blev sat under afstemning og vedtaget af forsamlingen med 82 stemmer for, 44 imod og 10 hverken for eller imod.
As Mr Pegado Liz objected to the proposed compromise, it was put to the vote and adopted by the Assembly by 82 votes to 44, with 10 abstentions.
Jorge Pegado Liz var ligeledes fortaler for, at EØSU indtager en neutral holdning, og advarede om bivirkningerne ved at have unuancerede synspunkter om de negative folkeafstemninger.
Mr Pegado Liz defended the Committee’s decision to take a neutral position, and highlighted the harm that the adoption of a categorical stance could bring to a referendum.
Jorge Pegado Liz var principielt enig i ordførerens holdning, men mente, at en ændring af formuleringen af Nederlandenes forslag kunne gøre initiativet acceptabelt.
Mr Pegado Liz agreed, in principle, with the rapporteur's position, but felt that the Netherland's initiative could be acceptable if the proposal's wording were changed.
Jorge Pegado Liz, Armin Duttiné, Andrzej Adamczyk, Thomas McDonogh og Thomas Janson deltog i den efterfølgende generelle debat.
Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Duttine, Mr Adamczyk, Mr McDonogh and Mr Janson took part in the general debate that followed.
Jorge Pegado Liz, Arno Metzler, Henri Malosse, Thomas Delapina, Etele Baráth, Joost van Iersel og Ullrich Schröder deltog i den generelle debat.
Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Metzler, Mr Malosse, Mr Delapina, Mr Barath, Mr van Iersel and Mr Schröder spoke in the general discussion.
Jorge Pegado Liz, Bryan Cassidy and Evangelia Kekeleki tog ordet i den efterfølgende generelle debat og rejste følgende spørgsmål:
Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Cassidy and Ms Kekeleki spoke in the ensuing general discussion and raised the following points:
Jorge Pegado Liz, Christoph Lechner og Bryan Cassidy tog derefter ordet for at rejse følgende spørgsmål:
Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Lechner and Mr Cassidy then spoke on the following questions:
Jorge Pegado Liz, Georgios Dassis og Bryan Cassidy udtalte sig om arbejdets rækkefølge.
Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Dassis and Mr Cassidy spoke on the order of work.
Jorge Pegado Liz, Giuseppe Guerini, Bryan Cassidy, Peter Morgan, Bernard Huvelin, Johannes Kleemann, Armin Duttine og Thomas Palmgren tog ordet for at rejse følgende punkter:
Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Guerini, Mr Cassidy, Mr Morgan, Mr Huvelin, Mr Kleemann, Mr Duttine and Mr Palmgren took the floor to raise the following points:
Jorge Pegado Liz, Ivan Voleš og Ulla Sirkeinen tog ordet under den generelle debat angående følgende punkter:
During the general debate which followed, Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Voles and Mrs Sirkeinen stressed the following points.
Jorge Pegado Liz, Josef Zbořil, Jacques Lemercier og Gerd Wolf tog ordet under den generelle debat.
Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Zboril, Mr Lemercier, and Mr Wolf spoke in the general discussion.
Jorge Pegado Liz, ordfører
Pegado Liz   rapp.
Jorge Pegado Liz, Veselin Mitov, Nils Juhl Andreasen, Mario Campli, Viliam Páleník og Carlos Trias Pintó tog ordet under den generelle debat.
Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Mitov, Mr Andreasen, Mr Campli, Mr Palenik and Mr Trias Pinto spoke in the general discussion.
Jorge Pegado Liz: Samarbejde med det tjekkiske formandskab; Det indre marked er stadig under udvikling, og der opstår nye forhindringer; Udtalelsen vil blive fremlagt i Prag i forbindelse med en SMV-høring om juridiske hindringer.
Mr Pegado Liz: cooperation with the Czech Presidency; the Single Market is still in progress and new obstacles arise; the opinion will be presented in Prague at an SMO hearing on legal barriers.
Jorge Stecher Navarra
Mr Stecher Navarra
Jorge Stecher Navarra
Stecher Navarra
Jorge Stecher Navarra (E - I)
Mr Stecher Navarra (E-I)
Jorge Stecher Navarra (E - I)
Mr Stecher Navarra (ES-I)
Jorge Stecher Navarra (E-I)
Mr Stecher Navarra (E-I)
Jorge Stecher Navarra (E-I)
Mr Stecher Navarra (E-I)
Jorge Stecher Navarra (I - ES)
Mr Stecher Navarra (E-I)
Jorge Stecher Navarra (I-E)
Mr Stecher Navarra (I-E)
Jorge Stecher Navarra (I-E)
Mr Stecher Navarra (I-ESP)
Jorge Stecher Navarra beklagede, at finansmarkederne i så ringe grad havde støttet euroen.
Mr Stecher Navarra regretted the lack of support for the euro on financial markets.
Jorge Stecher Navarra gav ligeledes de forudgående talere sin fulde tilslutning, idet han understregede kvaliteten af det udførte arbejde.
Mr Stecher Navarra also agreed with previous speakers on the quality of the work accomplished.
Jorge Stecher Navarra konstaterede, at ordførerens forslag lå helt på linje med ØSU's tidligere udtalelse.
Mr Stecher Navarra stressed that the draft text was consistent with previous ESC opinions.
Jorge Stecher Navarra mente, at EØSU's bidrag til konventets arbejde bør være koncentreret om emner, der direkte berører civilsamfundet.
Mr Stecher Navarra considered that the Committee's contribution to the Convention should focus on themes of direct concern to civil society.
Jorge Stecher Navarra påpegede, at den indgående diskussion i studiegrupperne, og de konklusioner, man havde draget, vidner om ØSU's effektivitet.
Mr Stecher Navarra said that the in-depth discussion in the study groups and the conclusions reached demonstrated the efficiency of the ESC.
Jorge Stecher Navarra roste ordføreren for hans sagkundskab og professionelle håndtering af emnet, men var til gengæld mindre enig i en række kritiske bemærkninger vedrørende overgangen til euroen.
Mr Stecher Navarra congratulated the rapporteur on his technical knowledge and mastery of the subject but was less happy with certain criticisms of the transition to the euro.
Jorge STECHER NAVARRA var modstander af, at bankerne i den monetære union skal have pligt til at ligge inde med en vis mindstereserve.
Mr Stecher Navarra was opposed to moves to require banks in the monetary union area to hold a minimum level of reserves.
Jorge Stecher Navarra – I
Mr J. Stecher Navarra - I
Jorge Stecher Navarra, formand, opfordrede til at stemme for udtalelsen.
The president, Mr Stecher Navarra, recommended that members vote for the opinion.
Jorge Stecher Navarra, næstformand i ØSU, åbnede høringen og forklarede, at målet med den var at få kendskab til de latinamerikanske delegeredes holdning til det forslag til udtalelse, der var under forberedelse.
The event was opened by Mr Jorge Stecher Navarra, Vice-Chairman of the ESC, who explained the objectives of the hearing, principally to get to know the views of the Latin American representatives on the Draft Opinion under preparation.
Jorge Stecher Navarra, Pedro Barato Triguero, Juana Borrego Izquierdo, José María Espuny Moyano, J. Ignacio Gafo Fernández, Gabriel García Alonso, Margarita López Almendáriz, Angel Panero Flórez og José Isaías Rodríguez García Caro fremlagde følgende ændringsforslag:
The following amendment was tabled by Mr Stecher Navarra, Mr Barato Triguero, Ms Borrego, Mr Espuny, Mr Gafo Fernández, Mr García Alonso, Ms Lopez Almendariz, Mr Panero and Mr Rodríguez García Caro:
Jorge Stecher Navarra, Pedro Barato Triguero, Juana Borrego Izquierdo, José María Espuny Moyano, J. Ignacio Gafo Fernández, Gabriel García Alonso, Margarita López Almendáriz, Angel Panero Flórez og José Isaías Rodríguez García Caro fremlagde følgende ændringsforslag:
Mr Stecher Navarra, Mr Barato Triguero, Ms Borrego, Mr Espuny, Mr Gafo Fernández, Mr García Alonso, Ms Lopez Almendariz, Mr Panero, Mr Rodríguez Caro tabled the following amendment:
Jorge Stecher Navarra, som havde været medlem af studiegruppen, roste ordføreren, fordi det var lykkedes ham at nedfælde studiegruppens synspunkter i forslaget til udtalelse.
Mr Stecher Navarra, who had been a member of the study group, praised the rapporteur for successfully distilling the views of the study group in his draft opinion.
Jorge Sà Borges
Sa Borges
Jorge Sà Borges
Sá Borges
Jorge Sá Borges
Sá Borges
Jorge Hay (E-I)
Mr Hay (E-I)
Jorge Hay mente derimod, at det er vanskeligt at føre skattepolitik på europæisk plan.
For Mr Hay, on the other hand, tax policy was difficult to implement at European level.
Jorge Pegado Liz
Jorge Pegado Liz
Jorge Pegado Liz følte, at det var korrekt at henvise denne udtalelse til CCMI.
Mr Pegado Liz felt that it was correct to attribute this opinion to the CCMI.
Jorge Pegado Liz rejste to spørgsmål om EU's 2020-strategien i arbejdsprogrammet og gennemførelsen af det indre marked.
Mr Pegado Liz asked two questions: what was being done about the EU 2020 strategy and the completion of the internal market.
Jorge Pegado Liz støttede forslaget til udtalelse og gik imod at ændre forordningen gennem fortolkende meddelelser.
Mr Pegado Liz backed the draft opinion and opposed any changes being made to the rules by interpretative communications.
Jorio Dauster, Brasiliens ambassadør, kunne heller ikke gå ind for, at der stilles politiske betingelser i handels- og samarbejdsforbindelserne mellem EF og de latinamerikanske lande.
Mr Jorio Dauster, Brazilian Ambassador, also opposed the application of political conditions to trade and cooperation relations between the EC and the Latin American countries.
JORIS (GD IV)
Kobia (DG IV)
Jorma Karppinen
Mr Karppinen
Jorma Karppinen fremlagde instituttets arbejdsprogram for 2006 og prioriteterne for 2007 med vægten på aktiviteterne i relation til beskæftigelse, arbejdstageres mobilitet, den aldrende arbejdsstyrke, balancen mellem arbejde og privatliv, arbejdsmarkedsrelationer, social samhørighed, omstruktureringer og håndteringen af forandringer.
Mr Karppinen presented the Foundation's Programme of Work 2006 and the priorities for 2007, highlighting work on employment, workers' mobility, the ageing workforce, work-life balance, industrial relations, social cohesion, restructuring and management of change.
Jorma Karppinen, direktør for Det Europæiske Institut til Forbedring af Leve- og Arbejdsvilkårene (Eurofound)
Jorma Karppinen, Director of Eurofound
Jorma Karppinen, direktør for Det Europæiske Institut til Forbedring af Leve- og Arbejdsvilkårene (Eurofound)
Mr Jorma Karppinen, Director of Eurofound
Jorma Kontio
Kontio
Jorma Kontio
Mr Kontio
Jorma Kontio (FIN-I)
Mr Kontio (FIN-I)
Jorma Kontio (FIN-I) (art. 54 - Ulla Sirkeinen)
Kontio (I-FIN) (Rule 54 - Sirkeinen)
Jorma Kontio (FIN-I) (Ulla Sirkeinen - FO art. 54)
Mr Kontio (FIN-I) (Mrs Sirkeinen - Rule 54 RP)
Jorma Kontio fandt det interessant at se, hvordan andre vurderede Finlands nabo, eftersom de to lande rent strukturelt havde meget til fælles.
Mr Kontio said that it was interesting to see how outsiders assess Finland's neighbour, since the two countries were structurally very similar.