natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Peter Horrocks mindede om EU's ledende rolle inden for bekæmpelse af klimaændringer og understregede betydningen af at opretholde EU's troværdighed på den internationale scene og vise, at EU og dets medlemsstater så seriøst på overholdelse af indgåede forpligtelser.
Mr Horrocks recalled the EU's leadership role in combating climate change and stressed the importance of maintaining its credibility in the international arena by showing that the EU and its Member States are serious about respecting its commitments.
Peter J. M. Boldt (Gr.
Mr Peter J.M. Boldt (Gr.
Peter J. M. Boldt påpegede, at udtalelsen var meget prisværdig og mindre radikal end, hvad nogen havde givet udtryk for.
Mr Boldt argued that the opinion was highly commendable and less radical than some had inferred.
Peter J.M. Boldt (Gr.
Mr Peter J.M. Boldt (Gr.
Peter Johansson (for Gruppe I)
Mr Peter Johansson (for Group I)
Peter JOHN (for medordføreren)
Mr Peter JOHN (for the Co-Rapporteur)
Peter Kendall, formand for landbrugernes verdensorganisation
Peter Kendall, chair of the World Farmers' Organisation
Peter Kendall, formand for landbrugernes verdensorganisation (WFO)
Peter Kendall, Chair of the World Farmers' Organisation
Peter KORN
Mr Peter Korn
Peter Korn (DE-I)
Mr Korn (DE-I)
Peter Korn (DE-I) (art. 62 - Jörg Rusche)
Korn (DE-I) (Rule 62 Rusche)
Peter Korn (DE-I) (art. 62 – Dittmann)
Mr Korn (DE-I) (Rule 62 - Dittmann)
Peter Korn (DE-I) (for Bernd Dittmann, art. 62)
Mr Korn (DE-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Dittmann)
Peter Korn (GR.
Mr Korn (Gr.
Peter Korn (Gr.
Mr Peter Korn (Gr.
Peter Korn (I – DE)
Mr Korn (I-DE)
Peter Lindvald-Nielsen
Mr Lindvald-Nielsen
Peter Lindvald-Nielsen, chef for Kommunikationsafdelingen
Mr Lindvald-Nielsen, Head of Communication
Peter Lindvald-Nielsen, chef for Kommunikationsafdelingen
Mr Lindvald-Nielsen, Head of the Communication department
Peter M.W. Elsenaar
Mr Peter M.W. Elsenaar
Peter Mandelsen holdt en tale den 23. januar i Berlin, hvor han opridsede udsigterne og strategien for at afslutte Doha-runden.
Mr Mandelson had given a speech on 23 January in Berlin outlining the prospects and strategy for concluding the Doha round.
Peter Mandelson, EU's kommissær for Handel
Mr Peter Mandelson, EU Trade Commissioner
Peter Marshall
Marshall Peter
Peter MEDHURST (for Gruppe II)
Mr Peter Medhurst (for Group II)
Peter Mihok
Mr Peter Mihok
Peter Mihok (GR.
Mr Mihok (GR.
Peter Mihók (art. 62 – Jan Oravec) (SK-I)
Mr Mihók (Rule 62 Oravec) (SK-I)
Peter Morgan
Drilleaud
Peter Morgan
Morgan
Peter Morgan
Mr Morgan
Peter Morgan
Mr Morgen
Peter Morgan
Mr Morgan
Peter Morgan
Piette
Peter Morgan
The rapporteur-general
Peter Morgan (art. 54 - Mobbs)
Morgan (Rule 54 - Mobbs)
Peter Morgan (art. 62 – Brendan Burns)
Mr Morgan (Rule 62 – Mr Burns)
Peter Morgan (art. 62 – Burns) (UK-I)
Mr Peter Morgan (Rule 62 - Mr Burns) (UK-I)
Peter Morgan (art. 62 – Cassidy) (UK-I)
Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Cassidy)
Peter Morgan (EN-Gr.
Mr Morgan (UK-Gr.
Peter Morgan (EN-I)
Mr Morgan (EN-GRI)
Peter Morgan (for medordføreren)
Mr Morgan (for the co-rapporteur)
Peter Morgan (for ordføreren)
Günther Bachmann (for the rapporteur)
Peter Morgan (for ordføreren)
Peter Morgan (for the rapporteur)
Peter Morgan (forlader kategorien"SMV, Håndværk og Liberale Erhverv")
Peter Morgan (has left the SMEs, crafts and professions category)
Peter Morgan (Gr.
Morgan (Gr.
Peter Morgan (I-UK)
Mr Morgan (I-UK)
Peter Morgan (I-UK) (art. 62 - Burns)
Mr Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62, Burns)
Peter Morgan (ordfører)
Mr Morgan (rapporteur)
Peter Morgan (UK - I)
Mr Morgan (UK – I)
Peter Morgan (UK – I)
Mr Morgan (UK – I)
Peter Morgan (UK) (art. 62 – David Sears)
Mr Morgan (UK-I) (rule 62 –Mr Sears)
Peter Morgan (UK-Gr.
Mr Morgan (UK-Gr.
Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Morgan (UK-I)
Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Morgan Peter (UK-I)
Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Mr  Morgan (UK-I)
Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Mr Morgan (I - UK)
Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Mr Morgan (UK-I)
Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Mr Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Mr Peter Morgan (UK–I)
Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Peter Morgan (UK-I )
Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Peter Morgan (UK–I)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art. 54 - Kenneth Walker)
(Rule 54 for Mr Walker)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art. 62 - Cassidy)
Mr Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Cassidy)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art. 62 - Sears)
Mr Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 - Mr Sears)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art. 62 – Angelova)
Mr Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Angelova)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art. 62 – Brendan Burns)
Mr Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 - Burns)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art. 62 – Cassidy)
Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Cassidy)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art. 62 – Cassidy)
Mr Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Cassidy)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art. 62 – Croughan)
Mr Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Croughan)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art.62 – Cassidy)
Mr Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Cassidy)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art.62 – Croughan)
Mr Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Croughan)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (art.62 – Henri Brichart)
Mr Morgan (GRI-UK) (Rule 62 Mr Brichart)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) (artikel 62 – Sears)
Mr Morgan (Rule 62 – Sears) (UK-I)
Peter Morgan (UK-I) – (art. 62 – McDonogh)
Morgan (UK-I) (Rule 62 – McDonogh)
Peter Morgan betragtede det som en mangel, at det i udtalelsen ikke erkendes, at virksomhedernes primære ansvar er af økonomisk karakter.
Mr Morgan argued that the opinion failed to recognize that the basic responsibility of corporate activity was economic.
Peter MORGAN erkendte, at de omvæltninger, informationssamfundet medfører, er sammenlignelige med omvæltningerne under den industrielle revolution; for at undgå negative sociale følger må man være med på fronten i den nye teknologiske revolution.
Mr MORGAN accepted that the changes brought about by the information society could be likened to those resulting from the industrial revolution; it was essential to be in the vanguard of the new technological revolution in order to avert the negative social consequences.
Peter Morgan erklærede afslutningsvis, at han tilsluttede sig Rose D'Sas holdning og med andre ord ikke ville stemme for resolutionen, om end han præciserede, at han forstod og respekterede ordførerens tankegang i forbindelse med udarbejdelsen.
Mr Morgan concluded by stating that he supported Ms D'Sa's position and would not vote in favour of the resolution, even though he understood and respected the line of reasoning taken by the rapporteur when drafting the resolution.
Peter Morgan erklærede sig enig i de synspunkter, som Rose D'Sa og Krzysztof Pater havde fremført.
Mr Morgan agreed with Ms D'Sa and Mr Pater.
Peter Morgan forelagde sin udtalelse, som handlede om revision af direktiv 95/46/EF.
Mr Morgan presented his opinion, which dealt with the revision of Directive 95/46 EC.
Peter Morgan forelagde udtalelsen, hvorefter der fulgte en generel debat, under hvilken Christoph Lechner tog ordet.
Mr Morgan presented the opinion and this was followed by a general debate in which Mr Lechner spoke.
Peter Morgan foreslog følgende fire ændringsforslag indføjet forud for de generelle bemærkninger:
Mr Morgan proposed to insert the following four amendments before the general comments:
Peter Morgan forklarede kort, hvad Kommissionens meddelelse drejede sig om.
Mr Morgan briefly explained what the Commission Communication dealt with.
Peter Morgan fremsatte forslag om at slette pkt. 7.2.
Mr Morgan, with Mr Wolf's backing, presented an amendment proposing the deletion of 7.2.
Peter Morgan fremsatte følgende ændringsforslag (ændringsforslag 3):
Mr Morgan proposed the following amendment (amendment 3):
Peter Morgan gik imod udtalelsen, som han fandt overflødig, fordi den ikke tager reelle problemer op.
Mr Morgan opposed the opinion, which he felt was superfluous since it did not tackle the real issue.
Peter Morgan kritiserede, at udtalelsen var blevet udarbejdet under tidspres, og påpegede, at mange operatører ikke var blevet hørt.
Mr Morgan criticised the urgency of the referral and emphasised that many operators had not been consulted.
Peter Morgan mente ikke, at der var noget i vejen for, at ØSU ved eventuelt at vedtage Lars Nybergs modudtalelse indtager en anden holdning end Europa-Parlamentet.
Mr Morgan felt that it would not be a problem if the Committee were to take up a different position to the one expressed by the European Parliament should it adopt Mr Nyberg's counter-opinion.
Peter Morgan og Wilfried Beirnaert foreslog at behandle temaet sundhed og sikkerhed på arbejdspladsen med særlig vægt på betingelserne for effektiv gennemførelse af arbejderbeskyttelsesreglerne og på de nye risici.
Mr Morgan and Mr Beirnaert brought up the subject of health and safety at work, the focus of which should be on the conditions for the efficient implementation of work safety rules and on the new risks.
Peter Morgan opfordrede ordføreren til i udtalelsen at nævne de dybe forbindelser, der var mellem visse EU-medlemsstater og Japan.
Mr Morgan asked the rapporteur to make reference to the highly developed nature of relations between certain EU Member States and Japan.
Peter MORGAN påpegede, at problematikken omkring den fælles markedsordning for sukker nøje hænger sammen med risikoen for flytning af produktionen og forædlingsindustrien.
Mr MORGAN drew the Committee's attention to the fact that the problem of the COM/Sugar was closely linked to the danger of a relocation of sugar production and processing.
Peter Morgan redegjorde for udtalelsens indhold og understregede, at ØSU nødvendigvis skulle nå til enighed om emnet.
Mr Morgan outlined the content of the opinion and pointed out that it was necessary for the Committee to reach a consensus on the subject.
Peter Morgan rejste et generelt spørgsmål om, hvorvidt den foreslåede lovgivning er på højde med den reelle alvorlige sundhedsfare.
A general question was raised by Mr Morgan on whether the proposed legislation is proportionate to the gravity of the health risk involved.
Peter MORGAN sagde under henvisning til en fremtrædende britisk politikers nylige besøg i Singapore, at de europæiske lande også kan lære meget af visse asiatiske modeller.
Referring to a recent visit by a UK political figure to Singapore, Mr MORGAN felt that European countries too could take a tip from certain Asian models.
Peter Morgan sagde, at beskæftigelseskrisen egentlig var en virksomhedskrise.
Mr Morgan emphasised that the job crisis was in fact a business crisis.
Peter Morgan sagde, at det var vigtigt, at debatten om EU's egne indtægter indebærer en forståelse af de problemer, som øremærkning medfører.
Mr Morgan explained that it is important to introduce into the "own-resources" debate an understanding of the problems created by hypothecation.
Peter Morgan sagde, at hans oprindelige ændringsforslag havde været for vidtgående.
Mr Morgan stated that his initial amendment had gone too far.
Peter Morgan støttede Jonathan Peels synspunkter og kom ind på tre punkter:
Mr Morgan supported Mr Peel's view and raised three points:
Peter MORGAN støttede solidaritetsprincippet, men beklagede at udtalelsen ikke beskæftiger sig med de "moralske risici" der er forbundet med de former for social beskyttelse der ikke baner vej for samhørighed og fællesskab, men derimod for arbejdsløshed, undergravning af initiativlysten og ugunstige vilkår for virksomhederne.
Mr Morgan, whilst supportive of the solidarity principle, expressed regret that the opinion avoided dealing with the "moral hazard" arising from forms of social protection which did not act as a source of cohesion and community, but instead of unemployment, the sapping of initiative and of damage to enterprise.
Peter Morgan så to hovedproblemer i udtalelsen: Dels var visse arbejdsretslige spørgsmål uafklarede, dels kom det ikke tilstrækkelig tydeligt frem, at en styrkelse af den sociale dimension forudsætter højere skatteindtægter og dermed også flere beskæftigede.
Mr Morgan felt there were two major difficulties with the opinion: 1) certain employment law issues were left unresolved; and 2) the opinion failed make sufficiently clear that strengthening the social dimension would require higher tax revenue and thus more people in work.
Peter Morgan takkede studiegruppen for det frugtbare samarbejde og sagde afslutningsvis, at hovedbudskabet i denne udtalelse er, at vi alle skal spørge os selv, hvor sikre vores pc'er og personlige oplysninger på internettet er.
In turn, Mr Morgan thanked the Study Group for the productive collaboration and concluded that the key message from this opinion is that we should all ask ourselves how secure are our PCs and personal information on the internet.
Peter Morgan talte om begrebet om pensionsordningers "flytbarhed".
Mr Morgan spoke on the concept of "portability" of pensions.
Peter Morgan tog udgangspunkt i sine egne erfaringer som ansvarlig for VSA i en multinational virksomhed.
Mr Morgan spoke from his own experience as the person responsible for CSR in a multinational.
Peter Morgan udtrykte sig anerkendende om ordførerens arbejde, men havde også forståelse for An Le Nouails ændringsforslag, som han fandt logiske i et Europa, der gennem Schengen-aftalen har afskaffet grænsekontrol.
Mr Morgan congratulated the Rapporteur, but also expressed his sensitivity towards Mrs Le Nouail's amendments, arguing that they were logical in the context of a Europe which through the Schengen Agreement had abandoned border checks.
Peter Morgan udtrykte stor tilfredshed med såvel rapporten som initiativet til at etablere rundbordsdialogen, som kan bane vejen for en reel samtale mellem lige parter.
That would make it possible to establish a real dialogue between equal partners.
Peter Morgan understregede betydningen af de sprog, som kun tales i bestemte regioner, samt den rigdom, som Europas mange forskellige sprog udgør.
Mr Morgan stressed the importance of the languages peculiar to particular regions and the rich variety of languages spoken in Europe.
Peter Morgan var ordfører på EØSU's udtalelse.
The rapporteur of the EESC opinion was Mr Morgan.
Peter Morgan vendte tilbage til Schuman-planens succes.
Mr Morgan referred back to the success of the Schuman plan.
Peter Morgan ønskede en anmodning om direkte støtte til SMV'er, der beskæftiger sig med produktion af sjældne lægemidler.
Mr Morgan wanted to include a petition for direct aid for SMEs involved in the production of orphan drugs.
Peter MORGAN, der havde ledet to møder i studiegruppen, oplyste, at Gruppe II selv havde besluttet at lade Gruppe II's ekspert deltage i redaktionsgruppens møde i stedet for et medlem.
Mr Morgan, who had chaired two study group meetings, pointed out that the decision to send the Group II expert in place of a member to the drafting group meeting had been taken by Group II alone.
Peter Morgan, ordfører
Mr Morgan, rapporteur
Peter Morgans forslag blev forkastet med et flertal af stemmer imod, 9 stemmer for og 13 hverken for eller imod.
Mr Morgan's proposal was rejected by a majority against, nine votes in favour and 13 abstentions.
Peter Mortensen
Mr Peter MORTENSEN
Peter Mortensen (for Gruppe II)
Mr Peter Mortensen (for Group II)
Peter Ondko (for ordføreren)
Mr Peter Ondko (for the rapporteur)
Peter Ondruska
Mr Peter Ondruska
Peter P. Balas oplyste, at der forhandles om en særlig beskyttelsesklausul for udviklingslande med EU’s støtte.
Mr Balas explained that a special safeguard clause was being negotiated for the developing countries, with EU support.
Peter P. Balas roste EØSU’s udtalelse om forberedelserne til den sjette ministerkonference i WTO – den var aldeles klar og helt på linje med Kommissionens tanker.
Mr Balas complimented the EESC on its opinion on the preparations for the 6th WTO Ministerial Conference, noting that it was quite clear and very much in line with the EC thinking.
Peter Pascher (for ordføreren)
Mr Peter Pascher (for the rapporteur)
Peter Poulsen (for Gruppe III)
Mr Peter Poulsen (for Group III)
Peter Rakšányi
Mr Peter Rakšányi
Peter Rottner (for Gruppe III)
Mr Peter Rottner (for Group III)
Peter Rottner (for Gruppe III)
Peter Rottner (for Group III)
Peter Sand MORTENSEN (for Gruppe II)
Mr Peter Sand Mortensen (for Group II)
Peter Sand Mortensen (for gruppe II)
Peter Sand Mortensen (for Group II)
Peter SAND MORTENSEN (for ordføreren)
Mr Peter Sand Mortensen (for the rapporteur)
Peter Sarosi (for Gruppe III)
Mr Peter Sarosi (for Group III)
Peter Scherrer
Mr Peter Scherrer
Peter Scherrer
Mr Scherrer
Peter Scherrer (DE - Kat.
Scherrer (DE-Cat.2)
Peter Schmidt (Arbejdstagergruppen – DE)
Peter SCHMIDT (Workers – DE)
Peter Schmidt (DE-II)
Mr Peter Schmidt (DE-II)
Peter Schmidt gjorde indsigelse mod kompromiset vedrørende ændringsforslaget til punkt 4.3.5.4, der var fremsat af Tellervo Kylä-Harakka-Ruonala.
The compromise on the amendment to point 4.3.5.4 tabled by Ms Kylä-Harakka-Ruonala was objected to by Mr Schmidt.
Peter Schmidt understregede desuden, at det største problem i fødevareforsyningskæden er den ulige magtfordeling, som oftest er til fordel for supermarkederne og visse multinationale selskaber og til ulempe for landbrugere, arbejdstagere og SMV'er.
Mr Schmidt also stressed that the main problem in the food supply chain is the imbalance of power, mostly to the advantage of the retail sector and some transnational companies and to the detriment of farmers, workers and SMEs.
Peter Schonewille fra Kommissionens GD for Beskatning og Toldunion understregede betydningen af EF-Domstolens rolle og erkendte, at formuleringen af punkt 4.9 var vanskelig.
Mr SCHONEWILLE of the Commission DG for Taxation and the Customs Union emphasised the important role of the Court of Justice and acknowledged the difficulties arising from the formulation of point 4.9.
Peter Schäfer (for Gruppe I)
Mr Peter Schäfer (for Group I)
Peter Seideneck
Mr Seideneck
Peter Seideneck (for Gruppe II)
Mr Peter Seideneck (for Group II)
Peter Seideneck (for Gruppe II)
Mr Peter Seideneck (Group II)
Peter Seideneck (for ordføreren I)
Mr Peter SEIDENECK, (for Group I)
Peter Skyte
Mr Peter Skyte
Peter SLAUGHTER (for ordføreren)
Mr Peter Slaughter (for the rapporteur)
Peter Slominski (for Gruppe III)
Mr Peter Slominski (for Group III)
Peter Smith (for Gruppe II)
Mr Peter Smith (for Group II)
Peter Thiele
Mr Peter Thiele
Peter Tindemans, medlem af styringsgruppen for Initiativet vedrørende videnskab i Europa, fremlagde Initiativets resultater i relation til det europæiske forskningsrum for sektionen.
Mr Peter Tindemans, member of the ISE steering committee (Initiative of Science in Europe) presented the ISE findings on the European Research Area.
Peter Trillingsgaard (for Gruppe I)
Mr Peter Trillingsgaard (for Group I)
Peter VADÁSZ
Mr Peter Vadász
Peter VADÁSZ
Ms Ellen Nygren
Peter Vadász
Mr Peter Vadász
Peter Vadász
Mr Péter Vadász
Peter Vadász
Mr VADÁSZ
Peter Vadász (GR.
Mr Vadász (Gr.
Peter Wiesner (for Gruppe I)
Mr Peter Wiesner (for Group I)
Peteris Krigers
Mr Peteris Krigers
Petermanns-opløsning
Petermann’s solution.
Peters (stedfortræder for Dittmann)
Peters (alternate Dittmann)
Peters, T., GD II/B/1
Peters T., DG II/B/1
PETERSBORG
PETERSBURG
PETERSEN
DOUVIS
PETERSEN
Korfiatis
PETERSEN
Mr  Petersen
PETERSEN
Mrs
PETERSEN
Rangoni Machiavelli
PETERSEN
REA
PETERSEN
THYS
PETERSEN
TIXIER
PETERSEN (*)
Petersen
PETERSEN (D-I)
Mr Gauder (B-I)
Petersen (DE-I)
Mr Petersen (DE-I)
Petersen (DE-I)
Petersen   DE-I
Petersen (DE-I)
Petersen DE-I
Petersen (DE–I)
Mr Petersen (DE–I)
PETERSEN (fuldmagt fra CONNELLAN)
Petersen (voting rights of
PETERSEN (fuldmagt fra GIESECKE)
Petersen (voting rights of Mr Giesecke)
PETERSEN (fuldmagt fra LEHNHOFF)
Petersen (voting rights for Mr Lehnhoff)
PETERSEN (fuldmagt fra LEHNHOFF)
Petersen (voting rights of Lehnhoff)
PETERSEN (fuldmagt fra LEHNHOFF)
Petersen (voting rights of Mr Lehnhoff)
PETERSEN (fuldmagt fra LEHNHOFF)
Petersen (voting rights of Mr Lehnoff)
PETERSEN (fuldmagt fra REGNELL)
Petersen (voting rights of Mrs Regnell)
PETERSEN (GD XI)
Petersen (DG XI)
Petersen (Gr.
Mr Petersen (Gr.
PETERSEN (overdragelse af stemmeret fra LEHNOFF)
Petersen (voting rights of
PETERSEN (stemmefuldmagt fra LEHNHOFF)
Petersen (voting rights of Mr Lehnhoff)
PETERSEN *
Petersen
PETERSEN foreslog en omformulering af tredje punktum i pkt. 2.2.5.3.
Mr PETERSEN proposed re-drafting the third sentence of point 2.2.5.3.
PETERSEN Jens Peter, valgt med 123 stemmer for, 9 stemmer imod og 7 hverken for
Petersen Jens Peter, elected by 123 votes to 9, with 7 abstentions
PETERSEN slog til lyd for, at der blev holdt et tredje møde i studiegruppen.
Mr Petersen called for a third study group meeting.
Peter Boldt (FIN-II) (art. 62 – Markus Penttinen)
Mr Boldt (FIN-II) (Rule 62 – Penttinen)
Peter Boldt tog ordet under den generelle debat.
Mr Boldt spoke in the following general discussion.
Peter Coldrick understregede, at der bør være en klar forbindelse mellem Cancun-udtalelsen og den nye studiegruppes arbejde.
Mr Coldrick underlined that there needs to be a clear link between the Cancun opinion and work of the new study group.
Peter Mihók oplyste, at den liste over de slovakiske medlemmer, Rådet oprindeligt havde vedtaget, kan undergå mindre ændringer.
Mr Mihók informed the Bureau that slight amendments were likely to be made to the list of Slovak members originally adopted by the Council.
Peter Morgan (art. 54)
Mr Morgan (Rule 54)
Peter Morgan (formand)
Morgan (Pres.)
Peter Morgan (UK - I)
Mr Morgan (UK-I)
Peter Morgan (UK-I)
Mr Morgan (UK-I)
Peter Morgan, ordfører på Lissabon-processen, efterlyste en omtale af formålet med udtalelsen og kritiserede, at man af tidnød ikke havde mulighed for forbedre teksten.
Mr Morgan, the rapporteur on the Lisbon process, missed a reference to the purpose of the opinion and criticised the lack of time to improve the text.
Peter Schmidt
Peter Schmidt
PETIT
Mr Petit
Petit (for ordføreren)
Mr Petit
Petne (GD XI)
Ms PETNE (DG XI)
Petos undersøgelser fokuserede på seks lande: Tyskland, Storbritannien, Frankrig, Italien, Holland og Schweiz3.
Peto's study focused on six countries: Germany, Great Britain, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Switzerland.3.
Petr Mazzolini (for ordføreren)
Mr Petr Mazzolini (for the rapporteur)
Petr ZAHRADNÍK (CZ-I)
Petr ZAHRADNIK (CZ-I)
Petr ZAHRADNÍK (CZ-I)
ZAHRADNÍK (CZ-I)
Petr Zahradník (Arbejdsgivergruppen – CZ)
Petr ZAHRADNÍK (Employers - CZ)
Petr Zahradník (Arbejdsgivergruppen – CZ)
Petr Zahradník (Employers – CZ)
Petr Zahradník (CZ-I)
Mr Zahradník (CZ – I)
Petr Zahradník (CZ-I)
Mr Zahradník (CZ-I)
Petr Zahradník (CZ-I)
Mr Zahradník (CZ–I)
Petr Zahradník (CZ-I)
Zahradník (CZ-I)
Petra Neamt, Rumænien
Petra Neamt, Romania
Petra Völkerer (for Gruppe II)
Ms Petra Völkerer (for Group II)
Petraitienė (LT-II)
Ms Petraitienė (LT–II)
Petraitienė (LT–II)
Ms Petraitienė (LT–II)
Petraitienė, Irena
Koller, Erika
Petranov, for medordføreren
Mr Petranov, for the co-rapporteur
Petri (GD JLS)
Petri (DG JLS)
Petri HEINIMAA (for ordføreren)
Mr Petri Heinimaa (for the rapporteur)
Petringa
Mr Petringa
PETRINGA  (*)  (for Donnelly, art. 62)
Petringa (*) (Rule 62 for Mr Donnelly)
PETRINGA (art. 61 for Lardin)
PETRINGA (Rule 61 – Mr Lardin)
PETRINGA (art. 62)
Mr Petringa (Rule 62)
PETRINGA (for Lardin, art. 61)
PETRINGA (Rule 61 – Mr Lardin)
PETRINGA (for Mathgen, art. 61)
PETRINGA (Rule 61 – Mr Mathgen)
PETRINGA (IT - III)
Mr Petringa (IT-III)
Petringa (IT-III)
Mr      Petringa (IT-III)
Petringa (IT-III)
Mr Petringa (IT-III)
Petringa (IT-III)
Mr Petringa (IT-III)
Petringa (Ordfører)
PETRINGA (Rapporteur)
Petringa Francesco
Petringa   Francesco
Petriskåle af porcelæn med en diameter på 5-7 cm og en kanthøjde på ikke over 5 cm
Porcelain petri dishes, five to seven centimeters in diameter, not exceeding five centimeters in height
Petriskåle.
Petri dishes.
petrokemiske anlæg og raffinaderier
petrochemical plants and refineries
Petrolessence SA, Société de gestion de restauration routière SA mod Kommissionen170
Petrolessence SA, Société de gestion de restauration routière SA v Commission170
Petroleum (EUR/1 000 l)
Kerosene (€/1000 l.)
petroleum anvendt som motorbrændstof2
Kerosene used as a propellant2
Petroleum Dry Cleaners – 40 C.F.R. del 60, afsnit JJJ
Petroleum Dry Cleaners — 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart JJJ;
Petroleum Refineries – 40 C.F.R. del 60, afsnit J
Petroleum Refineries — 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart J;
Petroleum Refineries – 40 C.F.R. del 60, afsnit J og Ja
Petroleum Refineries — 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart J and Subpart Ja;
Petroleum Refineries – 40 C.F.R. del 60, afsnit J og Ja
Petroleum Refineries — 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart J, and Subpart Ja;