natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
John Little kommenterede sit, Alfons De Vadders og Rainer Franz's forslag om at udelade punkt 4.3 med den begrundelse, at forslaget vedrører et internt ØSU-anliggende, som ikke hører hjemme i en udtalelse.
On behalf of himself, Mr De Vadder and Mr Franz, Mr Little proposed that the whole of point 4.3 be deleted, on the grounds that the proposal made in this paragraph was an internal matter for the ESC and was out of place in an opinion.
John Little kommenterede sit, Alfons De Vadders og Rainer Franz's forslag:
Mr Little presented the following amendment on behalf of himself, Mr De Vadder and Mr Franz:
John LITTLE konstaterede en generel tendens til, at markedskræfterne ignorerer det regionale niveau.
Mr Little noted that market forces tended to overlook the regional level.
John Little konstaterede, at trods de uundgåelige meningsforskelle, som var kommet for dagens lys under det forberedende arbejde, var det i vid udstrækning lykkedes ordføreren at forlige de forskellige meningstilkendegivelser og han havde haft held til at udarbejde en udtalelse, som stort set var både velafbalanceret og realistisk.
Mr Little commented that in spite of the inevitable differences of opinion emerging during the preparatory discussions, the rapporteur had largely been able to reconcile the different points of view and had drawn up an opinion which was on the whole balanced and realistic.
John Little lykønskede endvidere Beatrice Rangoni Machiavelli med at have modtaget prisen "Woman who makes a difference".
Mr Little congratulated Mrs Rangoni Machiavelli who had received the "Woman who makes a difference" prize.
John LITTLE mente, at de central- og østeuropæiske lande ved deres EU‑tiltrædelse bør vide, hvorledes den fælles landbrugspolitik vil blive videreudviklet.
Mr Little said that when the CEEC join the European Union they should know how the CAP will evolve.
John Little mente, at debatten i sektionen var mundet ud i en udtalelse, som ikke var helt velafbalanceret, hvilket man imidlertid nemt kunne rette op på ved at godkende ændringsforslaget fra Renate Hornung-Draus og Rainer Franz.
Mr Little thought that the section discussion had resulted in a slightly unbalanced opinion but that this could be put right if the amendment from Mrs Hornung-Draus and Mr Franz was accepted.
John Little mente, at formuleringen ikke talte til EØSU's fordel, og at anden del af sætningen ikke vedrørte konventet.
Mr Little felt that the paragraph did not refer to the Committee in a sufficiently positive light and that the second part of the sentence did not concern the Convention.
John Little mindede om, at dette arbejde var startet med en ophedet debat i præsidiet om bidragets titel.
Mr Little reminded the Assembly that this work had started with a heated debate in the Bureau about the title.
John Little mindede om, at Rådet havde sat 30. april som frist for ØSU's udtalelse, og at der derfor kun ville blive afholdt ét studiegruppemøde, nemlig den 17. marts.
Mr Little recalled that since the Council had set 30 April as a deadline for the Committee's opinion, only one study group meeting would take place, on 17 March.
John Little mindede om, at Rådet nu havde anmodet ØSU om udtalelse.
Mr Little recalled that the Committee had now been consulted by the Council.
John LITTLE mindede om, at strukturfondenes målsætning er at skabe gode vilkår for en selvbærende økonomisk udvikling.
Mr LITTLE pointed out that the aim of the Structural Funds was to promote the conditions required for self-sustaining economic development.
John Little mindede om, at underudvalget havde indgået en aftale om den opgave, som redaktørerne skulle fuldføre, og om det dokument, der skulle udarbejdes til konventet, dvs. et dokument, der indeholdt EØSU's synspunkter om en række nøglespørgsmål, der var vigtige for konventet.
Mr Little pointed out that the sub-committee had come to an agreement about the draftsmen's task and on the document to be produced for the Convention, which was to be a document, based on past opinions, which set out the Committee's viewpoints on a number of key issues of interest to the Convention.
John Little nævnte nogle eksempler og forklarede, hvorfor man i udtalelsen foreslog at indføre et yderligere kriterium for støtteberettigelse med hensyn til mål 2; dette kriterium byggede på BNP.
Providing several examples, Mr Little explained why the opinion proposed adding a further Objective 2 eligibility criterion based on GDP.
John Little og Kenneth Walker udtrykte forbehold over for proceduren.
Mr Little and Mr Walker expressed reservations on procedural grounds.
John LITTLE og Liam CONNELLAN deltog i den generelle debat.
Mr LITTLE and Mr CONNELLAN spoke.
John LITTLE og ORDFØREREN modsatte sig forslaget.
Mr Little and the rapporteur opposed this proposal.
John Little pegede på det velbegrundede i sigtet med ændringsforslaget, men delte Kenneth Walkers bange anelser; for at undgå den nævnte ulempe foreslog han at føje følgende til litra a):
Mr Little stressed the soundness of the amendment's aims but shared Mr Walker's concern, and in order to avoid the disadvantage mentioned by him, he proposed adding the following to point a):
John LITTLE præsenterede et ændringsforslag til punkt 7.11., som accepteredes af ordføreren.
Mr LITTLE presented his amendment to Point 7.11.
John Little påpegede i den efterfølgende generelle debat, at det pga. af den begrænsede taletid, som den enkelte observatør ville blive tildelt, var vigtigt at være præcis og selektiv.
In the course of the ensuing general discussion, Mr Little argued that precision and selectivity on what the Committee wanted to say were vital, given the short speaking time allocated to each of the observers.
John LITTLE påpegede, at spørgsmålet om den perifere beliggenhed også er relevant for Nordeuropa.
Mr LITTLE pointed out that the north of Europe was also on the periphery.
John Little roste også redaktørerne for deres arbejde.
Mr Little also congratulated the drafters on their work.
John Little roste ordføreren og underudvalget for det udførte arbejde, men understregede, at medlemmerne af Gruppe I, som han er formand for, har to vigtige forbehold over for udtalelsen.
Mr Little congratulated the rapporteur and the sub-committee on the work that they had done, but stated that the members of Group I, which he chaired, had two major reservations about the opinion.
John LITTLE sagde følgende:
Mr LITTLE commented as follows:
John Little sagde, at Kommissionen fremlægger forslag for Rådet i efteråret 1999 eller foråret 2000, hvilket betyder, at rapportens forslag tages alvorligt på EU-plan.
The Commission would submit proposals to the Council in autumn 1999 or the following spring: this meant that the report's proposals would be taken seriously at Community level.
John Little slog til lyd for, at man opretholdt teksten om ØSU's sammensætning, da den var et resultat af meget vanskelige drøftelser.
Mr Little spoke in favour of preserving the text on Committee membership, as it was the outcome of extremely hard negotiations.
John Little spurgte, om resultattavlen for det indre marked ville blive den eneste større rapport, som Kommissionen udarbejdede til Rådet i dette halvår.
Mr Little asked whether the Single Market Scoreboard was to be the sole comprehensive report the Commission would be making to the Council during the current semester.
John Little stillede to ændringsforslag:
Mr Little presented the following two amendments:
John Little støttede ligeledes Anne‑Marie Sigmunds intention om at opfordre konventet til at nedsætte en arbejdsgruppe om den civile dialog på baggrund af den manglende entydige definition af begrebet.
He also agreed that Ms Sigmund should propose that the Convention set up a working group on civil dialogue, given the lack of a clear definition of the concept.
John Little syntes, at udtalelsen behandler grundlæggende spørgsmål, og at der var tale om en udmærket udtalelse.
Mr Little thought that the opinion tackled fundamental issues.
John LITTLE takkede ordføreren for hans indsats.
Mr LITTLE thanked the RAPPORTEUR for his work.
John Little trak sit ændringsforslag tilbage.
Mr Little withdrew his amendment as a result.
John Little udtalte sig imod ændringsforslaget.
Mr Little spoke against the amendment.
John LITTLE udtrykte sin støtte til ordførerens udtalelse.
Mr LITTLE endorsed the Opinion prepared by the Rapporteur.
John Little udtrykte tilfredshed med den foreslåede forenkling af de prioriterede mål og med Kommissionens ønske om at koncentrere indsatsen, bl.a. ved at nedbringe den samlede andel af befolkningen, som skulle kunne modtage støtte.
Mr Little therefore welcomed the proposed simplification of the priority objectives and the Commission's concern for concentrating assistance, in particular by reducing the total percentage of the population receiving assistance.
John Little understregede allerførst den betydning, som ØSU gennem længere tid har tillagt regionalpolitikken og strukturpolitikkerne, og erklærede, at han personligt var et vidne på, at disse politikker gjorde stor gavn, både på nationalt og europæisk plan.
Mr Little first of all stressed the importance that the Committee had long placed on regional and structural policies, and felt that he could personally vouch for the advantages of such policies at both national and European level.
John Little understregede, at de vigtige spørgsmål udestår, f.eks. spørgsmålet om repræsentativiteten af civilsamfundets organisationer eller om styrkelse af båndene mellem ØSU og disse organisationer, herunder specielt organisationer, der ikke er repræsenteret i ØSU.
They included for instance the representativeness of civil society organisations and the strengthening of links between the Committee and those organisations, especially the ones not represented within its ranks.
John Little understregede, at forslaget i udkastet til resolution, ud over de store følgevirkninger, var kontroversielt og ikke var blevet diskuteret tilbundsgående i udvalget.
Mr Little stressed that the proposal made in the draft resolution, besides its major financial implications, was controversial and had not yet been the subject of full debate by the Committee.
John Little var ikke enig i denne fortolkning, men foreslog at lade parentesen udgå.
Mr Little accepted this explanation, but proposed the deletion of the text in brackets.
John LITTLE var ikke enig med ordføreren  på visse punkter, hvortil han i øvrigt havde indgivet ændringsforslag.
Mr LITTLE disagreed with the Rapporteur on a number of points, and he would be submitting amendments to the Assembly.
John Little var imod en bibeholdelse af punktet i sin nuværende udformning.
Mr Little was in favour of leaving the paragraph as it stood.
John Little vendte sig mod forslaget.
Mr Little spoke against.
John Little, formand for Gruppe I
Mr Little, Group I President
John LITTLE, formand for Sektionen for Industri, Handel, Håndværk og Tjenesteydelser, meddelte forsamlingen, at sektionen havde måttet udarbejde sin udtalelse inden for meget snævre tidsrammer, således at det kun havde været muligt at afholde ét enkelt studiegruppemøde.
The president of the Section for Industry, Commerce, Crafts and Services, Mr Little, informed the Assembly that as the deadline for the opinion was very short, only one study group meeting had been possible.
John Little, formand for ØSU's Sektion for Industri, Handel, Håndværk og Tjenesteydelser, oplyste, at studiegruppen havde afholdt tre møder, og at en direktør fra Det Europæiske Rumagentur havde deltaget i et af møderne.
The president of the Section for Industry, Commerce, Crafts and Services, Mr Little, said that the study group had met three times and that a director of the European Space Agency had attended one meeting.
John Little, medordfører, erklærede sig enig i retningslinjerne i det udkast, som hovedordføreren havde forelagt;  dog ønskede han at understrege:
The co-rapporteur, Mr Little, said he agreed with the points contained in the draft submitted by the rapporteur-general, but wished to draw attention to:
John LITTLE, studiegruppens formand, bekræftede, at ordførerens tekst er et kompromis og en balancegang mellem ofte meget modstridende synspunkter, der kom frem på møderne.
Mr LITTLE, who had chaired the Study Group, made it clear that the Rapporteur's text was a compromise between the sometimes very disparate views expressed at the meetings.
John Little, Ursula Konitzer, A.M. Huntjens, Clare Carroll og Christa Schweng tog ordet under den detaljerede gennemgang.
The following members spoke during the point-by-point discussion: Mr Little, Ms Konitzer, Mr Huntjens, Ms Carroll and Ms Schweng.
John Littles dokument "ØSU's prioriteringer på mellemlang sigt"    (CES 1145/2000 fin)
Draft opinion by Mr Little "The medium-term priorities of the European ESC (CES 1145/2000 fin)
John Littles skriftlige ændringsforslag til punkterne 3.9 og 4.8 resulterede i kompromisløsninger.
Written amendments, submitted by Mr Little to points 3.9.
John LOTHIAN (for Gruppe III)
Mr John Lothian (for Group III)
John Lyons
Lyons
John LYONS
Mr LYONS
John Lyons (UK-II)
Mr Lyons (UK-II)
John Lyons bad om, at Kommissionens resultattavle blev sendt til alle sektionens medlemmer.
Mr Lyons asked that the Commission Scoreboard be sent to all section members.
John LYONS foreslog at indføje følgende:
Mr LYONS had proposed adding the following amendment:
John Lyons foreslog at ændre artikel 36, pkt. F, således:
Mr Lyons proposed modifying Rule 36 F as follows:
John LYONS fremlagde et ændringsforslag (CES 1291/94 fin ændr.
Mr LYONS presented an amendment (CES 1291/94 fin Am.
John LYONS gik imod dette ændringsforslag.
Mr LYONS opposed the amendment.
John LYONS gik imod forslaget og erindrede om, at meddelelsen om den nye variant af Creutzfeldt-Jakobs sygdom havde skabt panik i Europa, samt at han fandt det skandaløst, at den britiske regering i sådan situation gjorde brug af sin vetoret.
Mr LYONS opposed the amendment, pointing out that the announcement of the new strain of CJD had caused panic in Europe; it was scandalous that in such a situation the British Government had resorted to its veto.
John Lyons gik imod sektionens udtalelse.
Mr Lyons spoke against the section opinion.
John Lyons kunne ikke acceptere dette forslag og ønskede, at forsamlingen skulle tage stilling til ændringsforslaget som helhed.
Mr Lyons could not accept that proposal and asked the assembly to vote on the amendment as a whole.
John LYONS mente, at der var tale om en politisk fælde: der blev fremført løse påstande af mangel på et konkret analysegrundlag, således som formanden for studiegruppen, Peter MORGAN, allerede havde påpeget.
Mr Lyons thought that the weakness of the Opinion was that it made assertions without providing any supporting evidence - as the study group president, Mr Morgan, had already pointed out.
John LYONS pointerede, at der uanset ØMU‑projektet og de dertil knyttede konvergenskrav er behov for en budgetkonsolidering i medlemsstaterne.
Mr Lyons said that budgetary consolidation was essential in the Member States even without the prospect of monetary union and the convergence criteria related to it.
John LYONS rejste et procedurespørgsmål, idet han krævede, at fremgangsmåden for fremlæggelse af ændringsforslag blev respekteret.
Mr LYONS raised a point of order, and asked that the procedure for submitting amendments be respected.
John LYONS spurgte, om man skal forvente en stabil pengepolitik og stabile rammebetingelser også efter indførelsen af euroen, samt om stabilitets- og vækstpagten er tilstrækkelig til at garantere disse betingelser.
Mr Lyons asked about the prospects for a stable monetary policy and stable general economic conditions in the period following the introduction of the euro; he also wished to know whether the pact for stability and growth could guarantee such conditions.
John Lyons understregede, at det indre marked ikke var "et abstrakt intellektuelt begreb", men tværtimod hovedkilden til vækst og jobskabelse i EU.
Mr Lyons underlined that the single market was not "an intellectual abstraction" but the main source of growth and creation of employment in the EU.
John LYONS var endvidere interesseret i spørgsmålet om fleksibilitet i løndannelsen efter indførelsen af euroen.
The speaker was also interested in the question of whether there would be flexibility as regards the determination of wage levels following the introduction of the euro.
John LYONS ønskede at give udtryk for sine betænkeligheder ved og indvendinger mod indfaldsvinkelen i udtalelsen.
Mr LYONS expressed concern and disagreement with the line taken by the Opinion.
John Lyons' ændringsforslag til punkt 1.5, 2.1.3 og 2.2.6 blev godkendt af ordføreren og derpå af sektionen.
Mr Lyon's amendments to points 1.5, 2.1.3 and 2.2.6 were accepted by the rapporteur and then by the section.
John Lyons' ændringsforslag til punkt 2.3.1.1 blev godkendt i en let ændret udgave.
Mr Lyon's amendment to point 2.3.1.1 was accepted in a slightly modified version.
John M. LITTLE
The President
John Martin, direktør for beskæftigelse, arbejde og sociale anliggender i OECD
John Martin, Director for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs at the OECD
John Martin, direktør for beskæftigelse, arbejde og sociale anliggender i OECD
Mr John Martin, Director for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs at the OECD
John MAUNDER (for Gruppe I)
Mr John Maunder (for Group I)
John MORLEY, GD V
John Morley, DG V
John O'SULLIVAN (for Gruppe I)
Mr John O'SULLIVAN (for Group I)
John Panapoulos
Mr John Panapoulos
John Panopoulos
Mr John Panopoulos
John Panopoulos   (for ordføreren)
John Panopoulos (for the rapporteur)
John PANOPOULOS (for Gruppe I)
Captain John PANOPOULOS (for Group I)
John Panopoulos (for Gruppe I)
Mr John Panopoulos (for Group I)
John Panopoulos (for medordføreren)
John Panopoulos (for the co-rapporteur)
John Panopoulos (for ordføreren)
John Panopoulos (for the rapporteur)
John Panopoulos (for ordføreren)
Mr John Panopoulos  (for the rapporteur)
John Panopoulos (for ordføreren)
Mr John Panopoulos (for the rapporteur)
John POULSEN (for Gruppe II)
Mr John POULSEN (Group II)
John Prescott, vicepremierminister, lægger vægt på de store fremskridt, der har fundet sted takket være de offentlige serviceydelser, mens Tony Blair benytter enhver lejlighed til at understrege nødvendigheden af at ændre dem.
While John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, stresses the huge advances made as a result of the public services, Tony Blair misses no opportunity to emphasise the need for changes to them.
John ROGERS (for ordføreren)
Mr John ROGERS (Rapporteur's expert)
John Simpson
Brussels, ...
John SIMPSON
Mr John Simpson
John Simpson
Mr Simpson
John Simpson
Mr Simpson John
John Simpson
Simpson
John SIMPSON
The President
John Simpson  erklærede sig uenig i ændringsforslaget i såvel den oprindelige som den nye form.
Mr Simpson opposed both the amendment in its original and new form.
John Simpson (art.62 - Leif E. Nielsen) (UK-III)
Simpson (Rule 62 - Nielsen) (UK-III)
John Simpson (Gr.
Co‑rapporteur: Mr Simpson (Gr.
John Simpson (Gr.
J. Simpson (Gr.
John Simpson (Gr.
Mr Simpson (Gr.
John Simpson (III-UK)
Mr Simpson (III-UK)
John Simpson (III-UK)
Mr Simpson (UK-III)
John Simpson (III-UK)
Simpson (UK-III)
John Simpson (UK - III)
Mr Simpson (UK-III)
John Simpson (UK – III)
Mr John Simpson (UK-III)
John Simpson (UK)
SIMPSON (UK)
John Simpson (UK-III)
John Simpson (III-UK)
John Simpson (UK-III)
Mr Simpson (III-UK)
John Simpson (UK-III)
Mr Simpson (UK-III)
John Simpson (UK-III)
Mr Simpson (UK-III)
John Simpson (UK-III)
Simpson (UK-III)
John Simpson (UK-III) (art. 62 Rose D'Sa)
Simpson (UK-III) (Rule 62 – D'Sa)
John Simpson (UK-III) (artikel 62 - Jan Olsson)
Mr Simpson (UK-III) (Rule 62, Mr Olsson)
John Simpson (UK‑III)
Mr Simpson (UK-III)
John Simpson accepterede dette kompromisforslag.
Mr Simpson accepted this compromise proposal.
John Simpson accepterede ordførerens forslag.
Mr Simpson accepted the rapporteur's proposals.
John SIMPSON begrundede sit ændringsforslag med, at en sådan fond ikke var omtalt i direktivforslaget.
Mr SIMPSON argued that the draft directive made no mention whatsoever of such a fund.
John SIMPSON begrundede sit ændringsforslag med, at Kommissionen dermed kunne undgå problemerne med at definere forskellige kanalkategorier i forbindelse med forskellige former for kvoter, som det kunne vise sig vanskeligt at anvende.
He argued that this amendment offered a possible formula for avoiding the problems of defining different types of channel with different types of quota, which might prove difficult to implement.
John Simpson beklagede først og fremmest, at man på grund af tidsbegrænsningerne havde været nødt til at udpege en hovedordfører, selv om der var tale om et vigtigt emne.
Mr Simpson above all regretted that, despite the importance of the subject, time constraints had led to the appointment of a rapporteur-general.
John Simpson beklagede, at han på grund af den hurtige elektroniske afstemning, som formanden havde pålagt, ikke havde nået at stemme fór sidstnævnte ændringsforslag.
Mr Simpson complained that the president had conducted the electronic vote so quickly that he had not had a chance to vote for this last amendment.
John Simpson er interesseret i at deltage i konferencen.
Mr Simpson was also interested in attending.
John Simpson erkendte, at sektionens udtalelse var afbalanceret, men udtrykte de samme forbehold som Peter Coldrik.
Mr Simpson acknowledged that the section opinion was balanced but shared Mr Coldrick’s reservations.
John SIMPSON foreslog, at andet afsnit i dette punkt skulle slettes.
Mr Simpson proposed that the second paragraph be deleted.
John SIMPSON foreslog, at følgende blev tilføjet efter punkt 3.39.:
Mr SIMPSON proposed inserting the following new paragraph after 3.39.:
John SIMPSON foreslog, at følgende nye punktum tilføjes i forlængelse af det første afsnit:
Mr Simpson proposed that a new sentence be added at the end of the first paragraph:
John Simpson foreslog, at ordlyden af underpunkt 4) i punkt 11 affattes som følger:
In point 11(4), Mr Simpson proposed that the text be reworded as follows:
John SIMPSON foreslog, at samtlige ord efter "helt nye skatteformer" (en Internet‑afgift, en bit-skat og en Tobin-skat i sammenhæng med de internationale finansielle markeder) i andet punktum slettes.
Mr Simpson proposed that in the second sentence the words "... such as, for example, an Internet tax, a Tobin tax applicable to the international financial markets or a bit tax" be deleted.
John SIMPSON foreslog, at sidste punktum affattes som følger:
Mr Simpson suggested adding the following at the end of the final sentence:
John SIMPSON forklarede, at den britiske økonomi stort set var baseret på oksekød, og at EU-foranstaltninger derfor snarest muligt måtte vise resultater.
Mr SIMPSON explained that the UK economy was largely based around beef and there was a need for any EU measures to be successful as soon as possible.
John Simpson gav udtryk for, at udtalelsen ikke konkret imødekommer Europa-Parlamentets anmodning.
Mr Simpson expressed the view that the opinion did not really fulfil the European Parliament’s request.
John Simpson gjorde det klart, at hans ændringsforslag netop var møntet på disse to forhold.
Mr Simpson pointed out that the amendments that he had tabled aimed precisely to reply to this twofold concern.
John SIMPSON hilste det ligeledes velkommen, at man havde mulighed for at diskutere udtalelsen på plenum.
Mr SIMPSON also welcomed the chance to hold a Plenary Session debate.
John Simpson pegede på nogle ting, der kan vække en vis bekymring på kort sigt.
Mr Simpson underlined that some medium-term concerns should be given increased attention.
John Simpson repræsenterede Michael Smyth i henhold til artikel 18
John Simpson represented Michael Smyth under Rule 18
John Simpson repræsenterede ØSU
Mr Simpson had represented the ESC.
John Simpson repræsenterer ØSU
Mr Simpson will represent the Committee
John Simpson repræsenterer ØSU.
Mr Simpson would represent the Committee.
John Simpson roste ligeledes ordføreren for udtalelsen.
Mr Simpson also congratulated the rapporteur on her text.