natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Joost van Iersel (GR I – NL) erstatter Jans Simons (GR I – NL) i Markedsobservatoriet.
Mr Joost van Iersel (GR I – NL) was replacing Mr Jan Simons (GR I – NL) in the SMO.
Joost van Iersel (GR I – NL) erstatter Jans Simons (GR I – NL) i Markedsobservatoriet.
Mr van Iersel (GR I – NL) was replacing Mr Simons (GR I – NL) in the SMO.
Joost van Iersel (Gr I–NL)
Mr van Iersel (Gr I – NL)
Joost van Iersel (Gr.
Mr Joost van Iersel (Gr.
Joost van Iersel (Gr.
Mr Van Iersel (Gr.
Joost van Iersel (Gr.
Mr van Iersel (NL-Gr.
Joost van Iersel (Gr.
Rapporteurs: Mr Van Iersel (Gr.
Joost van Iersel (I – NL)
Mr van Iersel (I – NL)
Joost van Iersel (I-NL)
Joost VAN IERSEL (GR I-NL)
Joost van Iersel (I-NL)
Mr van Iersel (I - NL)
Joost van Iersel (I-NL)
Mr van Iersel (I-NL)
Joost van Iersel (I-NL)
Mr van Iersel (I‑NL)
Joost van Iersel (I-NL)
Mr Van Iersel (I–NL)
Joost van Iersel (I-NL)
Mr van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (I-NL)
Mr van Iersel(I-NL)
Joost van Iersel (I-NL)
Mr van Iersel (I-NL)
Joost van Iersel (I–NL)
Mr van Iersel (I–NL)
Joost van Iersel (NL - I)
Mr  van Iersel (NL-Gr.
Joost van Iersel (NL - I)
Mr van Iersel (NL–I)
Joost van Iersel (NL – Gr.
Mr van Iersel (NL – Gr.
Joost van Iersel (NL – Gr.
van Iersel (NL – Gr.
Joost van Iersel (NL – I)
Mr van Iersel (NL – I)
Joost van Iersel (NL – I)
Mr Van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL –I)
Mr van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL –I)
van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-Gr.
Mr Joost van Iersel (NL-GR I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-Gr.
Mr Van Iersel (NL – Gr.
Joost van Iersel (NL-Gr.
Mr Van Iersel (NL-Gr.
Joost van Iersel (NL-Gr.
Mr Van Iersel (NL-GRI)
Joost van Iersel (NL-Gr.
Mr van Iersel Joost (NL-Gr.
Joost van Iersel (NL-Gr.
Mr Van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost VAN IERSEL (NL-I)
Joost VAN IERSEL ( NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-GR I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost Van Iersel (NL–I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Mr van Iersel (GR I-NL)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Mr van Iersel (GRI-NL)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Mr van Iersel (I-NL)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Mr Van Iersel (I–NL)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Mr Van Iersel (Netherlands-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Mr van Iersel (NL – I)
Joost van IERSEL (NL-I)
Mr van Iersel (NL)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Mr Van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Mr van Iersel (NL-II)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Mr van Iersel (NL–I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Mr van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Van Iersel (I–NL)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)
Van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I) (art. 62 – Van den Bandt-Stel)
Mr van Iersel (NL-I) (Rule 62 – Ms van den Bandt-Stel)
Joost van Iersel (NL-I)2
Mr Van Iersel (NL-I)2
Joost van Iersel (NL-I) (art. 62–Jan  Simons)
Mr Van Iersel (NL-I) (Rule 62 – Simons)
Joost van Iersel (NL‑I)
Mr van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL–Gr.
Mr van Iersel (NL – Gr.
Joost van Iersel (NL–I)
Mr van Iersel (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL–I)
Mr Van Iersel (NL–I)
Joost van Iersel (NL–I)
VAN IERSEL (NL-I)
Joost van Iersel (NL–I)1
Mr Van Iersel (NL-I)1
Joost van Iersel anså udtalelsen for et nyttigt bidrag til dels en fælles holdning til bæredygtig udvikling, som omfattede erhvervsliv og industri, der var en vigtig kilde til forurening, dels til industripolitikken.
Mr van Iersel found the opinion helpful for forming a joint view on sustainable development that included enterprises and industry, which were an important source of pollution, and as a contribution to industrial policy.
Joost van Iersel Art.
Van Iersel
Joost van Iersel bad for sit vedkommende om mere detaljerede referater af budgetgruppemøderne.
Mr van Iersel asked for the minutes of Budget Group meetings to be more exhaustive.
Joost van Iersel beklagede, at den udtalelse, som Vladimir Matousek var ordfører for, ikke kom tilstrækkeligt ind på storbyområdernes problemer.
Mr Van Iersel regretted that the opinion for which Mr Matousek was rapporteur had devoted little attention to the problems of urban areas.
Joost van Iersel beklagede, at kommunikationen fra visse af udvalgets tjenestegrene havde været fokuseret på personalets situation, som om det var det eneste potentielle mål for terroristerne og medlemmerne ikke var i risikozonen.
Mr van Iersel criticised the fact that communications from some parts of the Committee had focused on the situation of officials, as if they were the only potential target of the attacks and members were not affected by the risks.
Joost van Iersel bemærkede, at selv om klimaændringerne fortjener størst mulig opmærksomhed, har udvalget ikke udtalt sig tilstrækkeligt herom.
Mr Van Iersel commented that although climate change required the greatest attention, the Committee was not saying enough on the issue.
Joost van Iersel betonede, at et godt iværksættermiljø er af den største betydning.
Mr van Iersel emphasized that a good entrepreneurial environment was of greatest importance.
Joost van Iersel bifaldt, at EØSU udarbejder en udtalelse for Europa-Parlamentet, men advarede om risikoen ved at blande opgaverne sammen.
Mr Van Iersel, who was pleased that the Committee would be preparing an opinion on the matter for the European Parliament, warned against the risk of superimposing numerous tasks.
Joost van Iersel deltog i det uformelle ministermøde om territorial samhørighed og bypolitik i Rotterdam den 29.-30. november 2004.
29-30 November 2004 – Mr van Iersel had attended the informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion and urban policy held in Rotterdam.
Joost van Iersel erklærede, at Lissabon-strategien er katalysator for økonomisk og social fornyelse i Europa.
Mr van Iersel stated that the Lisbon Strategy is the catalyst for economic and social renewal in Europe.
Joost van Iersel fandt ligesom de tidligere talere, at de lokale og regionale myndigheder viste stor interesse for de økonomiske og sociale spørgsmål, som blev behandlet i EØSU.
Following on directly from these contributions, Mr van Iersel believed that local and regional authorities had a particularly strong interest in the economic and social issues covered by the EESC.
Joost van Iersel fastslog, at hele udvalget var enigt i, at den sociale og økonomiske situation i EU var meget alvorlig.
Joost van Iersel stated that the whole Committee agreed that the social and economic situation in the EU was very serious.
Joost van Iersel forelagde forslaget til udtalelse og påpegede, at der var lagt særlig vægt på spørgsmålene om økonomisk styring i EU og den dertil knyttede institutionelle set-up.
Mr van Iersel presented the draft opinion and pointed out that particular attention had been paid to questions of economic governance in Europe and the associated institutional set-up.
Joost van Iersel forelagde udtalelsen og nævnte det ulige styrkeforhold mellem tilbudsgivere og ordregivere i forbindelse med offentlige kontrakter.
Mr van Iersel introduced the opinion, pointing out the imbalance of power between bidders and contracting authorities with regard to public contracts.
Joost van Iersel foreslog at ændre punkt 3.2.2
Mr Van Iersel proposed amending point 3.2.2
Joost van Iersel foreslog ligeledes på egne vegne og på vegne af P.L.H. Geraads og Jan Simons, at punkt 5.3.3 affattes som følger:
Mr van Iersel also proposed, on his own behalf and that of Mr Geraads and Mr Simons, that the following be added to point 5.3.3:
Joost van Iersel foreslog på egne vegne og på vegne af P.L.H. Geraads og Jan Simons at tilføje et nyt underpunkt til punkt 4, 5. led med følgende ordlyd:
Mr van Iersel proposed, on his own behalf and that of Mr Geraads and Mr Simons, that another sub-point be added to the bullet 5 of point 4, as follows:
Joost van Iersel foreslog to mulige løsninger for at gøre fremskridt på dette område uden at røre ved spørgsmålet om afstemning med kvalificeret flertal: den åbne koordinationsmetode og den positive virkning af konkurrence på skatteområdet.
Mr Van Iersel proposed two possibilities which could be put forward in that field, without raising the question of qualified majority voting, namely use of the open method of coordination and the positive impact of competition in the field of taxation.
Joost van Iersel foreslog, at man i forbindelse med Lissabon-reformprogrammerne især så på transport-, bolig- og det skattepolitiske område.
Mr van Iersel proposed to look, in the context of the Lisbon reform programmes, in particular at the areas of transport, housing and fiscal policy.
Joost van Iersel fremhævede behovet for at samarbejde med de nationale økonomiske og sociale råd og arbejdsmarkedets parter om gennemførelsen af Europa 2020-strategien.
Mr van Iersel underlined the need to cooperate with the national economic and social councils and the social partners in the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy.
Joost van Iersel fremhævede CCMI's bestræbelser på at opnå konsensus, efter at plenarforsamlingen havde sendt udtalelsen tilbage til underudvalget pga. det store antal ændringsforslag fra Brendan Burns (som ikke havde haft mulighed for at fremføre sine synspunkter på et tidligere tidspunkt, da han ikke er medlem af CCMI).
He stressed the CCMI's efforts to achieve consensus after the opinion had been returned to him by the Assembly due to the high number of amendments tabled by Mr Burns (who, not being a member of the CCMI, had been unable to present his views at an earlier stage).
Joost van Iersel fremhævede ligeledes de kulturelle og kreative industriers strategiske betydning ved overgangen til en videnøkonomi (hvilket netop er grunden til, at CCMI besluttede at se nærmere på disse industrier).
Mr van Iersel also highlighted the strategic importance of the cultural and creative industries in the transition to a knowledge economy (which was, indeed, the reason the CCMI had decided to focus on it).
Joost van Iersel fremhævede, at rapporten meget rammende behandlede de vigtige og følsomme spørgsmål, som rejses i samfundet, når det gælder indvandring og integration.
Mr Van Iersel stressed that the report very pertinently raised the important and delicate questions that migration and integration posed for our societies.
Joost van Iersel fremhævede, at USA på ny fører en aktiv politik på Balkan og efterlyste en bedre koordinering mellem EU og USA, hvad angår landene på Vestbalkan.
Mr Van Iersel stressed that the USA was once again pursuing an active policy in the Balkans and would like to see better coordination on the Western Balkans between the European Union and the USA.
Joost van Iersel fremlagde det kompromis, der var blevet indgået med Thomas Janson og Armin Duttiné:
Mr van Iersel presented the compromise negotiated with Mr Janson and Mr Duttine:
Joost van Iersel fremlagde kompromiset:
Mr van Iersel presented the compromise:
Joost van Iersel fremlagde programmet for "Styringsgruppen for Europa 2020".
Mr van Iersel set out the Europe 2020 steering committee's programme.
Joost van Iersel fremlagde udtalelsen i sin egenskab af formand for CCMI og henviste til udvalgets tidligere arbejde om bilsektoren.
Mr van Iersel presented the opinion, as president of the CCMI, and mentioned the previous work on the automotive industry.
Joost van Iersel fremlagde udtalelsen.
Mr Van Iersel presented the opinion.
Joost van Iersel gav fuld støtte til udtalelsen, som han beskrev som EØSU's hensigtserklæring for den kommende mandatperiode.
Mr van Iersel expressed his full support for the document which he described as the EESC's mission statement for the next term of office.
Joost van Iersel gav udtryk for modstand mod de foreslåede formuleringer under punkt 3.4 og 3.7 i udtalelsen (navnlig vendingen "enormt lovgivningsmaskineri") og tilkendegav, at han ville stemme imod udtalelsen.
Mr VAN IERSEL was against the wording proposed in points 3.4 and 3.7 of the opinion (particularly the terms "enormous legislative process") and said that he would vote against the opinion.
Joost van Iersel glædede sig endvidere over, at det ser ud som om, medlemsstaterne er på rette kurs, når det gælder strukturreformer.
Mr van Iersel also expressed his pleasure in seeing that Member States are getting on the right track as far as structural reforms are concerned.
Joost van Iersel glædede sig over de beløb, der var afsat til sektionerne, og håbede, at disse midler kunne lette medlemmernes arbejde med at promovere deres udtalelser og EØSU's image.
Mr van Iersel was satisfied with the sums allocated to the sections and hoped that these funds would facilitate the members' work in promoting their opinions and raising the Committee's profile.
Joost Van Iersel glædede sig over udnævnelsen af Jean-Claude Junker til formand for Ecofin.
Mr van Iersel congratulated Mr Juncker on his appointment as president of Ecofin.
Joost van Iersel henviste til den strukturerede debat, som er uddybet i detaljer i notat 3 a), og anførte, at EØSU bør begrænse sin rolle til at analysere den nuværende situation.
Mr Van Iersel made reference to the structured debate referred to in detail in item 3 a), by stating that the role of the Committee should be limited to analysing the current situation.
Joost van Iersel Iersel (Gr.
Mr van Iersel (Gr.
Joost van Iersel indrømmede, at udtalelsen pegede på et nyt fænomen.
Mr van Iersel conceded that the opinion pinpointed the appearance of a new phenomenon.
Joost van Iersel insisterede på, at man ikke skulle reducere brugen af engelsk, og gav udtryk for optimisme med hensyn til de fremskridt, der er sket inden for undervisning i mindre udbredte sprog.
Mr van Iersel also insisted that the use of English should not be reduced and was optimistic about the progress made in the teaching of lesser known languages.
Joost van Iersel konstaterede, at de finansielle procedurer som følge af de problemer, der opstod i forbindelse med Santer-Kommissionen, var blevet skærpet og nu udgør teknokratiske hindringer for de små og mellemstore virksomheders deltagelse i Kommissionens indkaldelse af tilbud.
Mr Van Iersel noted that following the difficulties encountered with the Santer Commission, financial procedures had been reinforced and had become technocratic obstacles to the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises in bidding for Commission invitations to tender.
Joost van Iersel markerede visse forbehold med hensyn til nødvendigheden af et rammedirektiv på området.
Mr van Iersel expressed reservations as to the need for a framework directive in this field.
Joost van Iersel mente, at de forskellige tilgange i henholdsvis den amerikanske centralbank, Federal Reserve, og i ECB skyldes, at de to banker ikke står i samme situation.
Mr van Iersel expresses the view that the different approaches between the US Federal Reserve bank and the ECB is due to the difference in the situation of the two banks.
Joost van Iersel mente, at det eneste fællestræk ved resultaterne af Frankrigs og Nederlandenes folkeafstemninger var afvisningen af den politiske klasse.
Mr van Iersel believed that the only point that the referenda results in France and the Netherlands had in common was a rejection of the political classes.
Joost van Iersel mente, at det er de offentlige myndigheder, som skal tage initiativ til at inddrage civilsamfundet, hvis Lissabon-strategiens mål skal nås.
Mr van Iersel considered that public authorities' should take the initiative of involving civil society in order to achieve the goals of the Lisbon Strategy.
Joost van Iersel mente, at det vil være vanskeligt at foretage en prioritering af visse emner frem for andre, og at man i stedet skulle øge sekretariatets støtte til medlemmerne i forbindelse med opfølgningen af udtalelser.
Mr van Iersel thought that it might prove difficult to prioritise certain topics over others, and instead he defended the need for secretariats to help members more during the follow-up period to opinions.
Joost van Iersel mente, at dokumentet havde en for eftergivende og venlig tone.
Mr Van Iersel considered the document to be too mild and nicely written.
Joost van Iersel mente, at man i dokumentet ligeledes burde komme ind på praksisen med "name sponsoring".
Mr Van Iersel felt the document should also refer to the practice of "name sponsoring".
Joost van Iersel mente, at ordførerne burde have flere oplysninger om opfølgningen af de udtalelser, de havde præsenteret.
Mr van Iersel deemed it necessary for rapporteurs to have more information on the follow-up given to opinions they had submitted.
Joost van Iersel mente, at subsidiaritetsprincippet ofte blev anvendt som undskyldning for ikke at gribe ind.
Mr Van Iersel thought that the subsidiarity principle was often used as a pretext for not intervening.
Joost van Iersel mente, at udtalelsen skaber retsusikkerhed på området, navnlig i forbindelse med subsidiaritet og nationale medlemsstaters prærogativer.
Mr van Iersel considered that the opinion created more legal uncertainties than it answered, notably as regards subsidiarity and the prerogatives of national Member States.
Joost van Iersel mente, at udtalelsen var af meget høj kvalitet.
Mr van Iersel applauded the very high quality of the opinion.
Joost van Iersel nævnte det strategidokument, som ECO-sektionen anvender i forbindelse med planlægningen af sit arbejde og opfølgning herpå.
Mr van Iersel referred to the strategy document which the ECO section used to plan and follow up its work.
Joost van Iersel og Josef Zbořil tog herefter ordet.
Mr van Iersel and Mr Zbořil also spoke.
Joost van Iersel oplyste, at ordføreren havde forhandlet sig frem til et kompromis med Thomas Janson og Armin Duttiné.
Mr van Iersel announced that the rapporteur had negotiated a compromise with Mr Janson and Mr Duttine.
Joost van Iersel pointerede, at virksomheder ikke kunne forventes at pålægge sig byrdefulde procedurer, herunder at stille sig til rådighed for alle mulige eksterne eksperter med informationer om emner, som lå uden for deres normale årsberetninger.
Mr van Iersel stated that companies should not be expected to impose upon themselves burdensome procedures including access by all sorts of outside experts to information and on subjects outside their normal annual reporting.
Joost van Iersel præciserede i sit svar til Jan Simons, at i Nederlandene er diskussionerne om forbindelserne mellem staten og EU øget siden det negative udfald af folkeafstemningen om forfatningstraktaten.
In response to Mr Simon's comment, Mr Van Iersel explained that the discussion on the relationship between the State and the EU had intensified following the no vote on the draft constitutional treaty.
Joost van Iersel præsenterede kort udtalelsen.
Mr van Iersel introduced the opinion briefly.
Joost van Iersel påpegede, at store byområder fik stadig større økonomisk betydning og udtrykte håb om, at Kommissionens tjenestegrene ville sætte mere fokus på de problemer, som fandtes her.
Mr van Iersel referred to the constantly growing economic importance of the metropolitan areas and expressed the hope that the Commission departments would give greater attention to their problems.
Joost van Iersel redegjorde for udtalelsens hovedindhold og dens baggrund, navnlig det dobbelte spørgsmål om "bedre lovgivning" og "bedre håndhævelse af fællesskabslovgivningen".
Mr Van Iersel referred to the gist of the opinion and its origins, in particular the two-fold question of "Better law-making" and "Better Implementation of EU Legislation".
Joost van Iersel rejste spørgsmålet om EU’s kapacitet til at gennemføre yderligere udvidelser og om, hvordan Tyrkiets optagelse vil påvirke EU.
Mr van Iersel expressed doubt about the capacity of the EU to manage successive enlargements and about the consequences for the Union of Turkey’s accession.
Joost van Iersel rejste spørgsmålet om, hvilke trusler mod euro’ens stabilitet der kunne ligge til grund for usikkerheden omkring Lissabon-strategien.
Mr van Iersel wondered what threats to the stability of the Euro might be hidden in the uncertainties surrounding the Lisbon strategy.
Joost van Iersel slog til lyd for en strategi, der kunne styrke de to udvalgs fælles interesser.
Mr van Iersel spoke to recommend a applying strategy that would strengthen the common interests of the two Committees.
Joost van Iersel sluttede af med at bede medlemmerne om enstemmigt at bakke op om dokumentet, således at det med solid og utvetydig støtte kan videreformidles til de europæiske institutioner, medlemsstaterne og interesserede organisationer.
Mr van Iersel concluded by calling for unanimous support for the document, in order to provide it with solid and united support with a view to dissemination among the European institutions, the Member States and relevant organisations.
Joost van Iersel spurgte ordføreren, om forslagene i udtalelsen var nok til at løse miljøproblemerne som krævet i tiltrædelsestraktaterne.
Mr van Iersel asked the rapporteur whether the proposals set out in the opinion were sufficient for resolving the environmental problems, as stipulated in the accession treaties.
Joost van Iersel spurgte, hvordan EØSU's henstillinger skulle gennemføres af medlemsstaterne.
Mr van Iersel asked how the EESC recommendations should be implemented by Member States.
Joost van Iersel spurgte, om det af hensyn til konkurrenceevnen var muligt at skabe en sammenhæng mellem forsknings- og udviklingspolitikken (F&U) og skattepolitikken.
Mr van Iersel asked whether it would be possible to establish a link between research and development policy (R&D) and tax policy, in order to improve competitiveness.
Joost van Iersel spurgte, om studiegruppen havde diskuteret de store geografiske forskelle i EU, og hvordan der kunne tages hensyn til disse ved gennemførelsen af direktivet.
Mr van Iersel asked if the study group had discussed the large geographical differences in the EU and how these could be taken into consideration when applying the directive.
Joost van Iersel støttede de første to ændringsforslag og understregede, at det tredje krævede en præcisering.
Mr van Iersel expressed his agreement with first two amendments and underlined that the third would need clarification.
Joost van Iersel så gerne, at der blev truffet en beslutning om en omorganisering af EØSU's rådgivningsstruktur med flere faglige sektioner og en organisationsstruktur, der i højere grad ligner Europa-Parlamentets.
Mr van Iersel proposed that a decision be reached on reorganising the Committee's consultative structures by increasing the number of sections to bring it closer to the structure of the EP.
Joost van Iersel takkede Harlem Désir for hans ord og spurgte ham om, hvilke initiativer han ville tage for at dæmme op for den kritiske og pessimistiske opinionsbølge over for Den Europæiske Unions rolle her op til valget.
Mr van Iersel thanked Mr Désir for his remarks and asked what measures he intended to take to change the wave of critical and pessimistic opinions about the role of the European Union as the date of the elections approached.
Joost van Iersel takkede kollegerne for deres indlæg, studiegruppens medlemmer for deres tillid og positive bidrag under hele arbejdet i studiegruppen.
Mr Van Iersel thanked colleagues for their comments and study group members for their trust and positive contributions throughout the work of the study group.
Joost van Iersel takkede talerne for disse indlæg og besvarede dem i korthed.
Mr van Iersel thanked the speakers for these contributions and replied briefly to each of them.
Joost van Iersel tilsluttede sig Filip Hamro-Drotz' forslag.
Mr van Iersel spoke in support of Mr Hamro-Drotz.
Joost van Iersel tilsluttede sig sidstnævnte bemærkning.
Mr van Iersel agreed with this point.
Joost van Iersel tog derefter ordet og bad om at få afklaret strukturen for konferencen om den økonomiske krise, som afholdes i marts.
Mr van Iersel requested further information regarding the structure of the conference on the economic crisis scheduled to be held in March.
Joost van Iersel tog ordet på vegne af studiegruppens formand, Stéphane Buffetaut, for at lykønske ordføreren med udtalelsen.
Mr Van Iersel, took the floor on behalf of Mr Buffetaut, president of the study group, in order to congratulate the rapporteur on her report.
Joost van Iersel tog ordet under den generelle debat.
Mr van Iersel spoke in the general discussion.
Joost van Iersel tog som den eneste ordet.
Mr van Iersel was the only member to speak in the ensuing debate.
Joost van Iersel uddybede visse punkter i arbejdsprogrammet, som ikke fremgik af dokumentet.
Mr van Iersel mentioned some parts of the work programme that did not appear in the document.