natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I sag C-215/1113 fastsatte Domstolen, at en fordringshaver i en anmodning skal kunne kræve renter, der er påløbet indtil datoen for betalingen af hovedkravet.
In Case C-215/11,13 the Court of Justice clarified that in an application a claimant should be able to demand interest accrued up to the date of payment of the principal.
I sag C-225/98 fandt EF-Domstolen, at59 de ordregivende myndigheder kan stille betingelser i forbindelse med bekæmpelse af arbejdsløshed, forudsat at de tilgodeser alle fællesskabsrettens grundlæggende principper, og kun i det omfang, hvor disse myndigheder står over for to eller flere prismæssigt ækvivalente tilbud.
In Case C-225/98, the Court of Justice held59 that contracting authorities can base the award of a contract on a condition related to the combating of unemployment, provided that this condition was in line with all the fundamental principles of Community law, but only where the said authorities had to consider two or more economically equivalent tenders.
I sag C-324/1224 fastslog Domstolen, at den manglende overholdelse af fristen for at indgive indsigelse mod et europæisk betalingspåkrav på grund af skyldnerens repræsentants fejl ikke begrunder en prøvelse af dette betalingspåkrav i medfør af artikel 20, idet en sådan manglende overholdelse ikke henhører under ekstraordinære omstændigheder som omhandlet i samme artikel.
In Case C-324/12,24 the Court of Justice ruled that a failure to observe the time-limit for lodging a statement of opposition to a European order for payment, by reason of the negligence of the defendant’s representative, does not justify a review of that order for payment pursuant to Article 20, since such a failure to observe the time-limit does not constitute extraordinary or exceptional circumstances within the meaning of that Article.
I sag C-408/03 mod Belgien, der blev indbragt for Domstolen den 30.3.2003, anmodede Kommissionen Domstolen om at erklære, at Belgien ikke havde opfyldt sine forpligtelser, bl.a. i henhold til direktiv 90/364, idet landet giver mulighed for automatisk notifikation af udsendelsesforanstaltninger for unionsborgere, som ikke har forelagt de nødvendige dokumenter for opnåelse af opholdstilladelse inden for en nærmere fastsat frist.
In the action against Belgium brought before the Court of Justice on 30.3.2003 in case C-408/03, the Commission asked the Court to declare that Belgium had failed to fulfil its obligations, inter alia, under Directive 90/364 by providing for the possibility to give automatic notification of an order to leave the country to Union citizens who have not produced the documents necessary to obtain a residence permit within a prescribed period.
I sag C-409/95 (Marschall/Land Nordrhein-Westfalen) konkluderede EF-Domstolen63, at en national lov, som giver kvinder fortrinsret til forfremmelse i den offentlige sektor i tilfælde, hvor der er mandlige og kvindelige kandidater, som er lige kvalificerede til den pågældende post, ikke er i strid med fællesskabslovgivningen, forudsat at visse betingelser er opfyldt, og at for­fremmelsen af en mandlig kandidat ikke på forhånd er udelukket.
In case C 409/95 (Marschall/Land Nordrhein-Westfalen), the European Court of Justice63 concluded that a national law which gives priority to women in promotions in the public sector in cases where there are male and female candidates who are equally qualified for the post in question does not conflict with Community law provided that certain conditions are satisfied and the promotion of a male candidate is not excluded from the outset.
I sag C-482/99 Frankrig mod Kommissionen fastslog Domstolen i sin dom55, at en offentlig virksomheds midler udgør statsmidler i medfør af traktatens artikel 107, da de offentlige myndigheder kan kontrollere disse midler.
In its judgment in Case C-482/99 France v Commission55, the Court of Justice also confirmed that the resources of a public undertaking constitute State resources within the meaning of Article 107 of the Treaty because the public authorities are capable of controlling these resources.
I sag C-549/07, Wallentin-Herrman8, præciserede Domstolen, at en teknisk fejl ved et luftfartøj ikke er omfattet af begrebet "usædvanlige omstændigheder".
In case C-549/07 Wallentin-Herrman8 the Court clarified when a technical problem in an aircraft cannot be regarded as an ‘extraordinary circumstance’.
I sag C-648/11 tages der ikke stilling til det tilfælde, hvor en mindreårig beslutter ikke at indgive en ny ansøgning i den medlemsstat, hvor vedkommende befinder sig.
The case of a minor who decides not to lodge a new application in the Member State where he/she is present is not addressed by case C-648/11.
I sag FI/2004/0082205 vedrørende markedet for adgang og opkaldsoprindelse i offentlige mobilnet i Finland konkluderede Kommissionen, at den påtænkte foranstaltning, som Ficora havde anmeldt, ikke kunne understøtte den konklusion, at TeliaSonera havde en stærk markedsposition på det finske marked for adgang og opkaldsoprindelse i offentlige mobilnet.
In case FI/2004/0082205, concerning the market for access and call origination on public mobile telephone networks in Finland, the Commission concluded that the draft measure notified by Ficora lacked the evidence to support the conclusion that TeliaSonera had significant market power in the Finnish market for access and call origination on public mobile telephone networks.
I sag T-526/10 Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami m.fl. mod Kommissionen nedlagde sagsøgerne påstand om annullation af grundforordningen, der fastsætter detaljerede regler om handel med sælprodukter26 af grunde, som omfatter overtrædelse af nærhedsprincippet.
In Case T-526/10, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Commission, the applicants requested the annulment of a Commission Regulation laying down detailed rules on trade in seal products,26 on grounds including a breach of the principle of subsidiarity.
I sag to kunne de afskedigede arbejdstagere også deltage i to ESF-projekter i ikt-sektoren6.
Regarding the second case, the redundant workers could also participate in two ESF projects in the ICT sector6.
I sagen Arco Chemie bemærkede Domstolen, at opfattelsen af materialet som affald kunne indikere, at det pågældende materiale var affald.
In Arco Chemie the Court has noted that the perception of the material as waste could be a factor that could indicate that the material concerned was waste.
I sagen Chacon Navas78 definerede EU-Domstolen begrebet handicap og afgjorde, at sygdom som sådan ikke er omfattet af dette begreb.
In Chacon Navas78, the CJEU defined the concept of disability and ruled that sickness as such did not fall within the concept.
I sagen CIA Security International havde Domstolen allerede fastslået, at manglende overholdelse af meddelelsespligten medfører, at den tekniske forskrift ikke kan gøres gældende.
In the case CIA Security International, the Court had already stated that failure to observe the notification obligation made the technical regulation unenforceable.
I sagen CICRA mod Renault2 fastslog Domstolen bl.a., at en rettighedsindehaver til et ornamentalt mønster tilknyttet en reservedel altid kan påberåbe sig sin rettighed over for en tredjemand, der fremstiller eller sælger sådanne dele, og at tilkendelsen og udøvelsen af sådanne rettigheder (patenter) ikke var i modstrid med principperne om fri bevægelighed for varer eller i sig selv bidrog til misbrug af dominerende stilling.
Renault case2, one of the Court’s rulings was that a right holder for an ornamental design relating to spare parts could always exercise their right against third parties manufacturing or selling such parts, and that obtaining and exercising such rights (patents) did not infringe the principles of free movement of goods or by itself constitute an abuse of a dominant position.
I sagen Comité d’entreprises de la Société française de production mod Kommissionen253 afviste Domstolen appellen fra personalerepræsentationen og sektorens fagforening mod en kommissionsbeslutning om, at eftersom de var andre personer end en beslutnings adressater, var de ikke individuelt berørt som omhandlet i EF-traktatens artikel 173, stk. 4.
In Comité d’entreprises de la Société francaise de production v Commission,253 the Court rejected an appeal by a works council and a trade union representing the sector in question against a Commission decision that, being persons other than those to whom the decision was addressed, they were not individually concerned within the meaning of the fourth paragraph of Article 173 of the EC Treaty.
I sagen Declan O'Byrne mod Sanofi7 udtaler Domstolen sig om begrebet "at bringe et produkt i omsætning" som omhandlet i direktivets artikel 11, og som er udgangspunktet for forældelsesfristen for anlæggelse af en sag om produktansvar.
In Declan O’Byrne v Sanofi7, the Court ruled on the notion of the “putting into circulation” of the product within the meaning of Article 11 of the Directive and when the limitation period of the liability action for defective products starts to run.
I sagen Den franske regering mod Kommissionen264 påpegede Domstolen, at EF-traktatens artikel 88, stk. 3, ikke indeholder en simpel anmeldelsesforpligtelse, men en pligt til forudgående anmeldelse.
In France v Commission264 the Court pointed out that Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty does not contain a simple notification obligation but the obligation to notify prior to implementation.
I sagen Deutsche Post fandt Kommissionen dog, at en del af støtten også blev anvendt til subsidiering af aktiviteter inden for den konkurrenceudsatte sektor for forretningspakker og til den offentlige posttjeneste, og den krævede derfor den pågældende del af støtten tilbagebetalt.
However, in the Deutsche Post case the Commission found that part of the aid was also being used to subsidise activities in the competitive business parcels sector as well as for public postal services and it therefore ordered the recovery of the corresponding part of the aid.
I sagen Elevators and Escalators pålagde Kommissionen den hidtil højeste bøde for et kartel (992 mio. EUR) samt den højeste bøde pr. virksomhed for overtrædelser af kartelreglerne (477 mio. EUR 8).
In Elevators and Escalators the Commission imposed the highest fine per cartel case to date (EUR 992 million) as well as the highest fine per undertaking for a cartel violation (EUR 477 million8).
I sagen European Night Services Ltd37 afgjorde Retten i Første Instans (præmis 182 i Rettens afgørelse), at definitionen af en international sammenslutning i artikel 3 i direktiv 91/440/EØF
In European Night Services Ltd37, the Court found (paragraph 182 of the decision) that the definition of international grouping in Article 3 of Directive 91/440:
I sagen Fondo Speciale Rotativo per la Ricerca Technologica151 fandt Kommissionen, at den industrielle forskning og udvikling var støtteberettiget i henhold til ramme­bestemmelserne på den betingelse, at aktiviteterne understøtter forskningens førkonkurrencestadium.
As to the compatibility of industrial research and development with the Treaty, the Commission found in the case Fondo Speciale Rotativo per la Ricerca Technologica151 that it may be eligible under the framework on condition that it is ancillary to the pre-competitive stage of research.
I sagen Ganzliner Beschichtungspulver GmbH134 vurderede Kommissionen, at de offentlige bankers afkald på tilbagebetaling af en del af lånene var i overensstem­melse med det private kreditorprincip, da forligsaftalen gav mulighed for en forholdsmæssig nettofortjeneste for samtlige kreditorer sammenlignet med udsigten til konkurs.
In Ganzliner Beschichtungspulver GmbH,134 the Commission considered that the waiver of repayment of part of loans by public banks complied with the private creditor principle, as the settlement agreement produced a proportionate net gain for all creditors compared to the alternative of liquidation.
I sagen Garcia Avello29 statuerede EF-Domstolen, at de nationale myndigheder i henhold til artikel 12 og 17 i EF-traktaten ikke har mulighed for at nægte at godkende en ansøgning om ændring af efternavn, der er indgivet af mindreårige unionsborgere med dobbelt statsborgerskab, der ville sætte dem i stand til at bære det efternavn, som de er berettiget til ifølge lovgivning og traditioner i den anden medlemsstat, hvis statsborgerskab de besidder.
In the Garcia Avello case29 the ECJ ruled that Articles 12 and 17 EC preclude national authorities from refusing to grant an application for a change of surname made on behalf of minor Union citizens with double nationality that would enable them to bear the surname to which they are entitled according to the law and tradition of their second Member State of nationality.
I sagen Gaz de France198 bekræftede Kommissionen ved en formel beslutning, at territoriale begrænsningsklausuler er i strid med EF-traktatens artikel 81.
In the Gaz de France case198 the Commission confirmed by formal decision that territorial restriction clauses infringe Article 81 EC.
I sagen Georgsmarienhütte (GMH) und Gröditzer128 indledte Kommissionen den formelle undersøgelsesprocedure, da der var tvivl om, hvorvidt en privat investor ville have accepteret at erlægge en betaling, da Gröditzer var ved at gå konkurs.
In Georgsmarienhütte und Gröditzer,128 the Commission opened the formal investigation procedure owing to its doubts whether a private investor would have agreed to the payment of a holding service fee, since Gröditzer was on the brink of insolvency.
I sagen Infront mod Kommissionen12 fastslog Retten i Første Instans den 15. december 2005, at skrivelsen fra Generaldirektoratet for Uddannelse og Kultur, hvor dette meddelte de britiske myndigheder, at Kommissionen ikke havde nogen indvendinger mod foranstaltningerne vedrørende tv-dækningen af begivenheder af væsentlig interesse i dette land, udgjorde en afgørelse i EF-traktatens artikel 249’s forstand.
On 15 December 2005, in the case Infront v Commission,12 the Court of First Instance ruled that the letter of the Director-General for Education and Culture informing the UK authorities that the Commission had no objections to the measures relating to television coverage of events of major importance in that country constituted a decision within the meaning of Article 249 EC.
I sagen Kamasinski mod Østrig12 blev det fastslået, at tolkningen skulle være af så tilstrækkelig høj kvalitet, at tiltalte kan få kendskab til sagen imod ham, og at han kan forsvare sig selv.
Austria12, it was established that the interpretation provided should be of a high enough standard to enable the defendant to have knowledge of the case against him and to defend himself.
I sagen Kamasinski mod Østrig17 fastslog Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol, at retten til tolkning gælder "dokumentationsmateriale", og at tiltalte skal have tilstrækkeligt kendskab til sagen mod ham for at sætte ham i stand til at forsvare sig selv18.
Austria17, the ECtHR stated that the right to interpretation applied to "documentary material" and that the accused should have sufficient knowledge of the case against him to enable him to defend himself18.
I sagen Kinderkanal og Phoenix160 konstaterede Kommissionen, at de licensafgifter, der blev opkrævet i Tyskland hos tv-seere skulle betragtes som statsmidler.
In Kinderkanal and Phoenix160 the Commission found that the receiver fees collected in Germany from each owner of a television set had to be classed as state funds.
I sagen KLM/NorthWest blev det ikke skønnet nødvendigt med forpligtelser.
In the case of KLM/NorthWest no commitments were held necessary.
I sagen Kommissionen mod Spanien statuerede EF-Domstolen, at de artikler, hvori traktaten hjemler mulighed for undtagelse (herunder artikel 296), angår "usædvanlige, klart afgrænsede tilfælde.
In Commission v Spain, the Court ruled that articles in which the Treaty provides for such derogations (including Article 296 TEC) "deal with exceptional and clearly defined cases.
I sagen Leger42 tog Domstolen stilling til et fransk dekret, som kontraindicerede bloddonation fra mænd, der havde haft seksuel kontakt med andre mænd.
In Leger,41 the Court assessed a French decree that contraindicated blood donation by men who had had sexual relations with other men.
I sagen Magefesa283 besluttede Kommissionen således den 13. oktober at indbringe spørgsmålet om de spanske myndigheders manglende overholdelse af tilbagesøgningskravet for Domstolen.
In the Magefesa case283 the Commission therefore decided on 13 October to refer to the Court of Justice the matter of non‑compliance of the Spanish authorities with the recovery order.
I sagen Manufacture Corrézienne de Vêtements256, indledte Kommissionen i embeds medfør en procedure vedrørende økonomisk støtte til en kriseramt virksomhed.
In the Manufacture Corrézienne de Vêtements case,256 the Commission started an ex officio proceeding with regard to aid intended to support a company in difficulty.
I sagen Moteurs Leroy Somer mod Dalkia France9 kendte Domstolen for ret, at direktivet skal fortolkes således, at det ikke er til hinder for en fortolkning af national ret eller anvendelse af en fast national retspraksis, hvorefter skadelidte kan gøre krav på erstatning for skade på en ting beregnet til erhvervsmæssig brug og anvendt til denne brug, hvis denne skadelidte alene fører bevis for skaden, defekten i produktet og årsagsforbindelsen mellem denne defekt og skaden.
In Moteurs Leroy Somerc v Dalkia France9, the Court of Justice ruled that the Directive must not be interpreted to mean that it does not preclude the interpretation of domestic law or the application of settled domestic case-law according to which the injured party may seek compensation for damage to an item of property intended for professional use and employed for that purpose where that injured party simply proves the damage, the defect in the product and the causal link between that defect and the damage.
I sagen Nordea/Postgirot godkendte Kommissionen på visse betingelser, at den skandinaviske bankkoncern Nordea overtog hele kontrollen med den svenske Postgirot Bank AB.
In the Nordea/Postgirot case, the Commission approved the acquisition by the Scandinavian banking group Nordea of sole control of Sweden's Postgirot Bank AB, subject to conditions.
I sagen om ABN Amro Bank13 skyldtes behovet for statsstøtte fortrinsvis den særlige adskillelsessituation, nemlig adskillelsen af de nederlandske bankaktiviteter fra den nødlidende Fortis-koncern og fra den tidligere ABN Amro Group.
In the case of ABN Amro Bank13, the need for State aid stemmed primarily from the specific separation context: separation of the Dutch bank activities from the ailing Fortis group and from the previously existing ABN Amro Group.
I sagen om Automobile Craoiva, en rumænsk bilfabrik (tidligere Daewoo Craoiva), indledte Kommissionen den formelle undersøgelsesprocedure i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 88, stk. 2, da de med privatiseringen forbundne betingelser syntes at ville medføre en fordel for den privatiserede virksomhed 98.
In the case of Automobile Craoiva, a Romanian car plant (formerly Daewoo Craoiva), the Commission opened the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC as the conditions attached to the privatisation appeared liable to confer an advantage on the undertaking undergoing privatisation98.
I sagen om Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena (MPS) stillede den italienske regering 2 mia. EUR til rådighed for at dække kapitalunderskuddet i forbindelse med Den Europæiske Banktilsynsmyndigheds stresstest i december 2011.
In the case of Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena (MPS), the Italian government provided €2 billion to cover a capital shortfall coming from the December 2011 European Banking Authority stress test.
I sagen om Bradford & Bingley30 sørgede Kommissionen for, at støttemodtagerne blev bankens private indskydere.
In Bradford&Bingley30, the Commission ensured that the beneficiaries of the aid will be the retail depositors of the bank.
I sagen om British Business Bank (BBB) godkendte Kommissionen f.eks. en integreret enhed til forvaltning af SMV'ers adgang til finansieringsprogrammer i Det Forenede Kongerige28.
For instance, in the case of the British Business Bank (BBB), the Commission approved an integrated entity for managing SME access to finance programmes in the United Kingdom28.
I sagen om Bundesligaen, der vedrører fælles markedsføring af rettighederne til medieudnyttelse af kampe i de to bedste tyske fodboldrækker for mænd, fandt Kommissionen, at fodboldforbundets eksklusive salg af de kommercielle transmissionsrettigheder kunne begrænse konkurrencen mellem klubber og virksomheder i de to bedste rækker.
In the Bundesliga case, which concerns joint marketing of the media exploitation rights in respect of matches in the German first and second national football divisions for men, the Commission considered that the exclusive selling of the commercial broadcasting rights by the league association could restrict competition between the clubs and companies in the first and second divisions.
I sagen om de italienske forsyningsværker377 skulle Kommissionen vurdere visse fordele tildelt virksomheder oprettet under italiensk lovgivning om oprettelse af aktieselskaber med offentlig majoritets- eller endog minoritetsdeltagelse.
In the Italian utilities case377 the Commission had to assess certain benefits granted to companies established under Italian legislation pertaining to the possible creation of joint stock companies with a majority or even minority public shareholding.
I sagen om den belgiske arkitektforening betød risikoen for repressalier, at høringskonsulenten afslog aktindsigt, da parterne herved ville have kunnet identificere den person, der havde givet oplysningerne.
In the Belgian Architects Association case, the danger of retaliation led the Hearing Officers to refuse access to a document in the file which would have allowed the parties to identify the informant.
I sagen om DHL Leipzig/Halle30 indledte Kommissionen undersøgelsesproceduren, fordi den nærede tvivl om, hvorvidt DHL ikke under alle omstændigheder ville skulle stille uddannelse til rådighed for de ansatte.
In the DHL Leipzig/Halle case30 the Commission initiated the investigation because it had doubts whether DHL would not anyway have to provide the training to its employees.
I sagen om dopede svømmere133 besluttede Førsteinstansretten den 30. september134, at Den Internationale Olympiske Komités dopingregler er rent sportslige regler, som ikke har noget med økonomisk virksomhed at gøre.
In the doped swimmers case133, the CFI decided on 30 September134 that the anti-doping rules of the International Olympic Committee are pure sporting rules without economic considerations.
I sagen om Ferriere Nord SpA nærede Kommissionen alvorlig tvivl om, hvorvidt miljøbeskyttelse er den reelle målsætning for de investeringer, der hævdes støtteberettigede, og den indledte derfor en procedure200.
In the Ferriere Nord SpA case, the Commission had serious doubts about whether the environmental protection concern was the primary goal of the alleged eligible investments and opened proceedings.200
I sagen om GM Antwerp27 fandt Kommissionen, at en del af den anmeldte statsstøtte var uforenelig, idet den ville have tjent til at finansiere uddannelsestiltag, som støttemodtageren skulle have finansieret under alle omstændigheder, selv uden støtte.
In the GM Antwerp27 case, the Commission found part of the notified State aid incompatible as it would have served to finance training activities which the beneficiary would have carried out anyway, even without aid.
I sagen om Hypo Alpe Adria Group (HGAA) godkendte Kommissionen i august 2013 en plan om, at bankens operative dele i Østrig og Sydøsteuropa skal sælges senest i midten af 2015, mens de resterende urentable dele gennemgår en velordnet afvikling.
In the case of Hypo Alpe Adria Group (HGAA) the Commission approved in August 2013 a plan according to which the operative parts of the bank in Austria and South-Eastern Europe will be sold by mid-2015, at the latest, while the non-viable remainder is put into an orderly wind-down process.