natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evalueringen viser også, at forordningen ikke i tilstrækkelig grad afspejler EU's aktuelle prioriteringer og den nationale praksis på området for insolvenslovgivning, navnlig når det handler om at redde virksomheder i vanskeligheder.
It also shows that the Regulation does not sufficiently reflect current EU priorities and national practices in insolvency law, in particular in promoting the rescue of firms in difficulties.
Evalueringen viser også, at virkningen af eEurope går begge veje, idet eEurope - defineret som den konsoliderede europæiske politik - somme tider påvirkes direkte af medlemsstater, der udnytter handlingsplanens gennemførelsesmekanismer.
The evaluation has also showed that the impact of eEurope goes two-way – where eEurope, defined as the consolidated European policy, is sometimes directly influenced by Member States utilising its delivery mechanisms.
Evalueringen viser sig kritisk over for mangelen på struktureret koordinering i de regioner, hvor budgetpost B7-6002 bringes i anvendelse, mellem interventioner i henhold til programmer, der er i overensstemmelse med de samme principper som det decentraliserede samarbejde, og interventioner, der finansieres via DS-budgetposten.
The assessment criticises the lack of structured coordination, in the regions eligible for heading B7‑6002, between operations under programmes governed by the same principles as decentralised cooperation and operations financed under the decentralised cooperation heading.
Evalueringen viser ‑ foruden en tydelig konvergens hen imod aktive arbejdsmarkedsprincipper i strategiens tidlige år ‑ at også andre politikker i betydelig grad blev påvirket af EBS (især politikker vedrørende ligestilling og bekæmpelse af social udstødelse).
Beyond the clear convergence towards the active labour market principles of the EES in the earlier years of the strategy, the evaluation shows that other policies were also significantly influenced by the EES (notably gender equality and social inclusion policies).
Evalueringen viser, at de finansierede projekter med sandsynlighed vil kunne bidrage betydeligt til at nå de mål, der er opstillet for dette program.
The findings of the evaluation indicate that the projects funded are likely to contribute significantly to the objectives of the DPIP.
Evalueringen viser, at de nationale programmer ikke tager hensyn til bestemte sårbare grupper, f.eks. falske selvstændige.
Evaluation shows that national programmes fail to take into account certain vulnerable groups for example false self-employed.
Evalueringen viser, at de strukturer, der er oprettet i forbindelse med opfølgningen på meddelelsen af 30. juli 1996 og resolutionen af 20. december 1996, såsom ekspertgruppen og det europæiske handicapforum samt det planlagte observationscenter for handicapspørgsmål, udgør vigtige skridt i retning af en formalisering af kommunikationskanalerne.
The evaluation underlines that structures established in the framework of the follow-up to the Communication of 30 July 1996 and of the Resolution of 20 December 1996, such as the High-level Group and the European Disability Forum represent significant efforts towards the formalisation of communication channels.
Evalueringen viser, at den generelle opbygning af direktivet, som kombinerer minimumskrav og certificering, fungerer, navnlig for nye bygninger.
The evaluation shows that the overall architecture of the Directive, combining minimum requirements and certification, is working, in particular for new buildings.
Evalueringen viser, at denne aktion også fungerer tilfredsstillende.
The evaluation shows that this action is also functioning satisfactorily.
Evalueringen viser, at der er et stærkt behov for programmet, og at programmets budget har et niveau, der ligger under den faktiske efterspørgsel.
The evaluation shows that the demand for the programme is strong and that the programme budget is below levels of actual demand.
Evalueringen viser, at der er meget forskellig praksis, når det gælder den praktiske gennemførelse af direktivets krav.
The review results indicate variable practices in the practical implementation of the Directive requirements.
Evalueringen viser, at der er ved at blive iværksat strukturreformer i medlemsstaterne, og dette førte til dalende ledighed og voksende beskæftigelse i EU i 2007.
The assessment shows that structural reforms are ongoing in the Member States, and this contributed to a decrease in unemployment and an increase in employment in the EU in 2007.
Evalueringen viser, at der fortsat er en stærk efterspørgsel efter programmet, og bedømt ud fra antallet af indsendte ansøgninger og andelen af godkendte ansøgninger er programmets budget for lille i forhold til niveauet i den aktuelle efterspørgsel.
The evaluation shows that the demand for the programme remains strong and judged on the numbers of submitted applications and the approval rate the programme budget is below levels of actual demand.
Evalueringen viser, at der ikke på nuværende tidspunkt er behov for at revidere direktivet, men at dets anvendelse kan forbedres yderligere:
The evaluation shows that there is no need at this time to revise the Directive but that its application can be further improved:
Evalueringen viser, at direktivet generelt har givet en merværdi på EU-plan.
The evaluation shows that overall, the Directive has provided EU added value.
Evalueringen viser, at direktivet i begrænset omfang har bidraget til at forbedre miljøbeskyttelsesniveauet i EU.
The evaluation shows that the Directive has helped improve the level of environmental protection in the EU to a limited degree.
Evalueringen viser, at EU-lovgivningen for færdigpakning er egnet til formålet, og at direktiverne er effektive, relevante, i overensstemmelse med andre EU-politikker og skaber merværdi i EU.
The evaluation has demonstrated that the EU legal framework for pre-packaging is fit for purpose and that the Directives are effective, efficient, relevant, coherent with other EU policies and have EU added value.
Evalueringen viser, at især de nationale programmer ikke tager hensyn til bestemte sårbare grupper, f.eks. kvinder, personer, som er ansat under nye kontraktforhold, og selvstændige iværksættere.
Evaluation shows that national programmes particularly fail to take into account certain vulnerable groups, such as women, those employed under new contractual arrangements and individual entrepreneurs.
Evalueringen viser, at målene for programmet er nået på dette område, og at denne aktion formår at skabe et miljø, der fremmer udviklingen af aktiviteter for unge i almindelighed og af programmet i særdeleshed.
The evaluation shows that the programme’s objectives in this field have been achieved and that this action is relevant to the creation of a favourable environment for the development of youth activities in general and the programme in particular.
Evalueringen viser, at programmet fungerer særdeles effektivitet og virkningsfuldt og har en klar merværdi på EU-plan.
The evaluation shows that the programme operates at very high levels of efficiency and effectiveness, and it clearly identifies its EU added value.
evalueringen viser, at programmet har nået sine vigtigste mål.
The evaluation shows that the Programme has been successful in achieving its main objectives.
Evalueringen viser, at programmet i høj grad er relevant for støttemodtagernes behov og problemer.
The evaluation shows that the programme is closely aligned with the needs and problems of the beneficiaries.
Evalueringen viser, at programmet trods dets begrænsninger har ydet et væsentligt bidrag til visse fremskridt på handicapområdet, selv om der kan gå nogen tid, inden disse fremskridt realiseres.
The evaluation indicates that in spite of its limitations, the programme has made an important contribution to certain developments in the disability field, although many of these developments may take some time to come to fruition.
Evalueringen viser, at regeringerne ofte er tilbøjelige til at betragte faldet i de kønsbestemte beskæftigelses- og arbejdsløshedsforskelle som et resultat af den økonomiske vækst og de forbedrede vilkår for kvindernes deltagelse på arbejdsmarkedet, og at de ikke i fornødent omfang overvåger konsekvenserne af deres foranstaltninger, som det ellers kræves i retningslinjerne.
The evaluation shows that too often governments tend to see the reduction of the gender gap in employment and unemployment as a result of economic growth and improved framework conditions for women's participation in the labour market, and do not sufficiently monitor the impact of their measures as required by the Guidelines.
Evalueringen viser, at støtte fra programmet har givet de modtagende organisationer mulighed for at styrke det europæiske fokus på deres aktiviteter, udvikle partnerskaber og netværk i hele EU og at nå den europæiske offentlighed.
The evaluation shows that funding provided by the Programme enabled supported organisations to increase European focus of their activities, develop partnerships and networks across the EU and to reach out to European audience.
Evalueringen viser, at to af de tre finansielle instrumenter, SMV-garantifaciliteten og ETF-iværksætterfaciliteten3, kan betragtes som en succes.
The evaluation indicates that two of the three financial instruments – the SME Guarantee Facility and the ETF Start-up Facility3 – can be considered a success.
Evalueringen viser, hvilke mangler og lakuner der er i det aktuelle mandat og foreslår, hvordan de kan afhjælpes på kort/mellemlang sigt.
The evaluation identifies shortcomings and gaps in the current mandate and proposes recommendations to address these in the short/medium term.
Evalueringen viste dog også, at Europass bør forenkles, blive mere målrettet og ajourføres.
However, the evaluation also suggested that Europass should be simplified, become more target-oriented and up-to-date.
Evalueringen viste dog, at en alt for stor grad af målretning af Fællesskabets finansielle instrumenter for SMV mod bestemte erhvervssektorer eller bestemte politikmål kan begrænse muligheden for at opnå markedets accept af dem.
However, evaluations have shown that excessive targeting of Community financial instruments for SMEs at special sectors of the economy or at certain policy goals can limit their acceptance in the market place.
Evalueringen viste imidlertid, at der var stor forskel på, hvordan disse aktører udfyldte deres rolle i de forskellige lande, og at der var behov for forbedringer.
The evaluation however showed that the way in which these actors fulfilled their respective roles varied considerably in the different countries and left room for improvement.
Evalueringen viste også, at ingen andre ansøgere har reageret på de årlige indkaldelser af forslag siden 2012, hvilket synes at vise, at ingen andre organisationer i øjeblikket er i stand til at udføre lignende EU-dækkende aktiviteter.
The evaluation also showed that no other applicant responded to the successive yearly calls for proposal since 2012, which tends to show that no other organisation is currently able to carry out similar Union-wide activities.
Evalueringen viste også, at it-systemer ofte blev taget "for givet" af deltagerlandene, og at der ikke var megen anerkendelse af forbindelsen til Fiscalis, hvilket burde undersøges (anbefaling 1).
The evaluation also showed that IT systems were often taken “for granted” by the participating countries, and that there was little acknowledgement of the connection to Fiscalis, which ought to be looked into (recommendation 1).
Evalueringen viste også, at partnerskaber, der er etableret og konsolideret inden for rammerne af narkotikasærprogrammet, med sandsynlighed vil blive videreført efter indstilling af Kommissionens finansiering og kan resultere i nye aktiviteter i den nærmeste fremtid.
The findings of the evaluation also show that partnerships established and consolidated in the framework of the DPIP are likely to continue after the Commission’s funding has ceased and might result in new activities in the near future.
Evalueringen viste visse mangler med hensyn til udnyttelse af resultaterne fra de projekter, der finansieres under programmet.
The evaluation identified certain deficits in relation to the exploitation of the result of the projects financed under the DPIP.
Evalueringen viste, at alle tre direktiver forbliver relevante og generelt anses for at være effektive med en betydelig merværdi for alle interessentgrupper (forbrugere, industrien og nationale myndigheder).
The evaluation showed that all three Directives continue to be relevant and are generally considered efficient and effective, with significant added value for all stakeholder groups (consumers, industry and national authorities).
Evalueringen viste, at de enkelte støttemodtagere anser udviklingen af nøglekompetencer for at have den mest positive virkning på deltagelsen i programmet for livslang læring.
The evaluation revealed that the development of key competences is considered the most positive impact of participation in LLP by its individual beneficiaries.
Evalueringen viste, at den samlede EU-merværdi ved projekterne var ret begrænset.
The evaluation showed that the overall EU added value of these projects was rather limited.
Evalueringen viste, at der bør udvikles SMART-mål, -indikatorer og -målsætninger – dvs. ("specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-bound") specifikke, målelige, opnåelige, realistiske og tidsbundne mål, eftersom næsten alle programmerne havde meget brede mål, der ikke passede til SMART-målestokken.
The evaluation showed that SMART – i.e. specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-bound – objectives, indicators and targets should be developed, as almost all the programmes had very broad objectives which did not measure up well against the SMART yardstick.
Evalueringen viste, at der er aspekter af den nationale gennemførelse og anvendelse, som kunne videreudvikles gennem bedre håndhævelse, overvågning af overholdelsen og evaluering.
The evaluation identifies aspects of the national transposition and implementation that could be further developed through better enforcement, compliance monitoring and evaluation.
Evalueringen viste, at der ikke er større hindringer for en succesfuld gennemførelse af programmet.
The findings of the evaluation confirmed that there are no major difficulties hindering the successful implementation of the programme.
Evalueringen viste, at disse EU-programmer var relevante for de pågældende sektorers behov, og at mange af aktiviteterne ikke ville være blevet gennemført uden den finansielle støtte fra programmerne.
The evaluation demonstrated that these EU programmes were relevant to the needs of the sectors concerned and that many of the activities would not have taken place without their financial support.
Evalueringen viste, at disse mekanismer har lettet clearingen af ophavsrettigheder og beslægtede rettigheder i forbindelse med grænseoverskridende satellitudsendelser samt simultane kabelretransmissioner af udsendelser fra andre medlemsstater.
The evaluation showed that these mechanisms have facilitated the clearance of copyright and related rights for cross-border satellite broadcasts and for the simultaneous retransmissions by cable of broadcasts from other Member States.
Evalueringen viste, at industrien anser kvaliteten af markedsovervågningen for at være et vigtigt element, og at det er et område, hvor de fleste myndigheder erkender, at deres indsats indtil for nylig har været begrænset.
The evaluation showed that the quality of market surveillance appears as an important concern of industry and it is an area where most authorities recognise that their effort until recently has been limited.
Evalueringen viste, at IPA gav gode og meningsfulde resultater.
The evaluation found that IPA produced good and meaningful results.
Evalueringen viste, at kendskabet til Told 2013 var forholdsvis udbredt blandt toldembedsmændene: 52 % af de embedsmænd, der deltog i undersøgelsen, kendte til programmet9.
According to the evaluation findings, Customs 2013 was relatively well known among customs officials: 52% of the surveyed officials knew of the programme9.
Evalueringen viste, at mekanismerne for donorkoordination og harmonisering af bistand var veletablerede, og at en afgørende faktor for at opnå virkning og holdbarhed var modtagerlandenes ejerskab til reformdagsordenen og deres forvaltningskapacitet, som skal styrkes.
The evaluation found that the mechanisms for donor coordination and harmonisation of assistance were well established and that a determining factor in terms of achieving impact and sustainability was the beneficiary countries' ownership of the reform agenda and the capacity of their administration, which need to be strengthened.
Evalueringen viste, at projekterne er stærkt afhængige af EU-finansiering til gennemførelse af aktiviteter og for at opnå en effekt lokalt.
The evaluation indicated that projects heavily rely on EU funding to implement the activities and to impact on the ground.
Evalueringen viste, at systemet var en væsentlig del af medlemsstaternes skatteforvaltningers værktøjskasse, idet mange embedsmænd brugte det dagligt til at foretage momsrisikoanalyse.
The evaluation showed that the system was an essential part of the Member States’ tax administrations’ toolbox in conducting VAT risk analysis, with many officials using it on a daily basis.
Evalueringen vurderede relevans, effektivitet, produktivitet, sammenhæng og EU-merværdi i forbindelse med den hidtidige gennemførelse af ESD.
The evaluation assessed the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, coherence and EU value added with respect of ESD implementation so far.
Evalueringen vurderer, at "Marseille-Provence 2013" hovedsageligt var en kulturel begivenhed ledsaget af en mere generel udvikling af områdets kulturelle infrastruktur, særligt i Marseille.
The evaluation considers that Marseille-Provence ECOC was primarily a cultural event which was accompanied by a broader development of the cultural infrastructure of the territory, particularly in Marseille.
Evalueringen vurderer, at de to ECOC gennemførte kulturelle projekter og aktiviteter, der var i overensstemmelse med ånden i deres ansøgninger og derfor også i overensstemmelse med de strategiske og operationelle formål med kulturhovedstadsaktionen.
It considers that the two ECOC implemented cultural projects and activities that were consistent with the essence of their applications and therefore in line with the strategic and operational objectives of the ECOC action.
Evalueringen vurderer, at positiv opbakning fra alle forvaltningsniveauer (nationale, regionale og lokale) og på tværs af politiske partier har været en vigtig succesfaktor for "Košice 2013".
The evaluation considers that positive support from all levels of government (national, regional and local), and cutting across political parties, has been an important factor in the success of Košice 2013.
Evalueringen, der blev afsluttet i december 20143, indeholder en omfattende analyse af direktivets gennemførelse samt en analyse af lovgivningens virkning ud fra fem vigtige evalueringskriterier.
The evaluation study, concluded in December 20143, contains an extensive analysis on the Directive's implementation as well as an analysis of the performance of the legislation according to five key evaluation criteria.
Evalueringen, der blev foretaget fra maj 2007 til maj 2008, opfylder kravene i finansforordningen2, dens gennemførelsesbestemmelser3 og bestemmelserne om evaluering med henblik på det syvende rammeprogram4.
The evaluation, carried out from May 2007 to May 2008, responds to the requirements of the Financial Regulation2, its Implementing Rules3, and the provisions for evaluation for the Seventh Framework Programme4.
Evalueringen1 førte til en konklusion om, at der ikke var behov for en umiddelbar revision, men at direktivet tages op til revision igen sammen med revisionen af direktivet om energimærkning, da virkningerne af gennemførelsesforordninger for miljøvenligt design og delegerede forordninger for energimærkning, der gælder for de samme energirelaterede produkter, ofte hænger sammen og supplerer hinanden.
That review1 concluded that no immediate revision was necessary, but that the Directive could be reviewed again along with the review of the Energy Labelling Directive, since the effects of ecodesign implementing regulations and energy labelling delegated regulations applicable to the same energy-related products are often linked and complementary.
Evalueringens anbefalinger vedrører en forbedring af sammenhængen, kvaliteten i forslagene og resultaterne, budgetpostens specificitet og forholdet mellem omkostninger og effektivitet.
The assessment's recommendations concern improving the consistency and quality of proposals and results, the specific nature of the line and cost‑effectiveness.
Evalueringens anvendelsesområde og metode
Scope and method of the evaluation
Evalueringens baggrund
Background for the review
evalueringens egnethed (metode og kvalitetskriterier)
The soundness of evaluation (methodology and quality criteria);
Evalueringens endelige konklusioner blev sammen med en række anbefalinger forelagt Kommissionen i 2006 og dannede grundlag for en meddelelse fra Kommissionen til Rådet og Europa-Parlamentet, som blev vedtaget den 19. december 20065.
The evaluation's final conclusions, together with a series of recommendations, were presented to the Commission in 2006, and were the subject of a Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament adopted on 19 December 20065.
evalueringens feedbackrolle som støtte for omprogrammeringsbeslutninger samt til foregribelse af centrale spørgsmål.
The feedback role of evaluation in supporting reprogramming decisions as well as anticipating key issues.
Evalueringens fokus var rettet mod såvel kvalitative som kvantitative aspekter:
The evaluation focused on both qualitative and quantitative aspects:
EVALUERINGENS FORMÅL
EVALUATION OBJECTIVES
Evalueringens formål
Objectives of the evaluation
Evalueringens formål og omfang
Purpose and scope of evaluation
Evalueringens gennemførelse
Implementing evaluation
Evalueringens hovedbudskab er behovet for kontinuitet og resultater
The Review’s main message is the need for continuity and results
Evalueringens konklusioner
Conclusions of the evaluation
Evalueringens konklusioner
The evaluation conclusions
Evalueringens konklusioner bør af samme grund kun betragtes som vejledende konklusioner, der skal bekræftes i de kommende år.
The conclusions of the evaluation should be considered indicative and to be confirmed in the coming years.
Evalueringens konklusioner og anbefalinger
EVALUATION CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Evalueringens kontekst
Context of evaluation
Evalueringens metode
Methodology for the evaluation
Evalueringens omfang
Scope of the evaluation
Evalueringens omfang dækker ikke spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt energibesparelser er mere eller mindre omkostningseffektive i andre sektorer.
The scope of the evaluation does not go into the question of whether energy savings are more or less cost-effectively achieved in other sectors.
EVALUERINGENS OMFANG OG MÅL
SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
Evalueringens overordnede mål var, at:
The overall objectives of the evaluation were:
Evalueringens overordnede mål var:
The overall aims and objectives of the evaluation were:
Evalueringens overordnede mål var:
The overall objectives of the evaluation were agreed as:
Evalueringens primære fokus vil være en vurdering af direktivets, som ændret, i den indledende fase..
The main focus of this evaluation will be to assess the initial effectiveness of the Directive as modified.
Evalueringens resultater er hovedsagelig baseret på primære informationskilder, som er dem, der forsyner evalueringseksperten med oplysninger direkte, nemlig interview, spørgeskemaer med svar fra respondenter og evalueringsskemaer fra seminarer1.
The evaluation findings are predominantly based on primary information sources, those providing information directly to the evaluator: interviews, questionnaires collecting the views of respondents, seminar evaluation forms.1
Evalueringens resultater og anbefalinger
The evaluation results and recommendations