natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Herefter fulgte en debat med indlæg fra Simons, Adamczyk, Stechova, Nielsen, Van Oorschot, Verboven, Voles, Manoliou, Alleweldt, Ekdahl og Hellam, der kom ind på en række spørgsmål, herunder:
In the ensuing discussion, interventions were made by Mr Simons, Mr Adamczyk, Ms Stechova, Mr Nielsen, Mr Van Oorschot, Mr Verboven, Mr Voles, Mr Manoliou, Ms Alleweldt, Mr Ekdahl and Ms Hellam on a number of issues, notably:
Herefter fulgte en debat med indlæg fra Simons, Bouis, Adamczyk, Fornea, Dillon, Verboven, Callanan, Boyle, Voleš, Morkis, Hellam, Cappellini og Barabás, der kom ind på en række spørgsmål, herunder:
In the ensuing discussion, interventions were made by Mr Simons, Mr Bouis, Mr Adamczyk, Mr Fornea, Mr Dillon, Mr Verboven, Mr Callanan, Mr Boyle, Mr Voleš, Mr Morkis, Ms Hellam, Mr Cappellini and Mr Barabás on a number of issues, notably:
Herefter fulgte en debat med præsidiets medlemmer.
The presentation was followed by an exchange of views with members of the Bureau.
Herefter fulgte en debat mellem præsidiemedlemmerne om denne anmodning om et besøg i Kina.
The proposed visit was then debated.
Herefter fulgte en debat om anmodningen om EØSU's civilsamfundspris 201 (GB‑CES289/2011), som der ikke var blevet opnået enstemmighed om i budgetgruppen.
A debate then followed on the request concerning the EESC Civil Society Prize for 2011 (GB CESE 289/2011) on which the budget group had been unable to reach a unanimous position.
Herefter fulgte en debat om de foreslåede retningslinjer i bilaget til dokumentet.
A discussion then took place on the guidelines suggested in the appendix to the document.
Herefter fulgte en debat om kvindernes underrepræsentation i EØSU's administrative instanser, under hvilken Thomas Etty, aldersformanden, og Maud Jansson tog ordet.
A discussion then followed on the under-representation of women in the EESC's administrative bodies during which Mr Etty, the interim president and Ms Jansson spoke.
Herefter fulgte en debat om tildelingen af de høringer, der er anført under punkterne 6, 7 og 12 i det vedlagte dokument, hvor Bryan Cassidy gentager forslaget om at inddrage INT‑sektionen i udarbejdelsen af udtalelserne under punkterne 7 og 12.
There was a discussion on the allocation of the referrals mentioned at points 6, 7 and 12 of the document set out in the appendix.
Herefter fulgte en debat om, hvordan man bedst kan tackle terrortrusler og religiøs fanatisme, med deltagelse af Buffetaut, Almeida Freire, van Iersel, Dassis, Cedrone, Attard, Jahier, Krawczyk og formanden.
The reading of this text was followed by a discussion on the appropriate reaction to the threat of terrorism and religious fundamentalism, in which the following members spoke: Mr Buffetaut, Mr Almeida Freire, Mr van Iersel, Mr Dassis, Mr Cedrone, Ms Attard, Mr Jahier, Mr Krawczyk and the president.
Herefter fulgte en debat på grundlag af ændringsforslagene fra Frederic Adrian Osborn, Eduardo Chagas og Lars Nyberg.
A discussion then took place on the basis of the amendments tabled by Mr Osborn, Mr Chagas and Mr Nyberg.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvor Benedicte Federspiel på den danske delegations vegne bad om, at afstemningen om forretningsordenen blev taget af dagsordenen for plenarforsamlingen, idet hun beklagede, at medlemmerne ikke havde fået en længere frist til at gennemgå de forslag, der var blevet vedtaget af forretningsordensudvalget, navnlig forslaget om en ændring af artikel 3.
The Bureau then held a discussion, in which Ms Federspiel, on behalf of the Danish delegation, requested that the vote on the Rules of Procedure be withdrawn from the Plenary Session's agenda, expressing her disappointment that members had not been given more time to consider the proposals that had been made by the Rules of Procedure Panel, in particular concerning the revision of Rule 3.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvor formanden fremlagde en anmodning fra José Isaías Rodríguez García‑Caro, som er ordfører for SOC/478, om at udsætte behandlingen af denne udtalelse til næste plenarforsamling.
A discussion then followed in which the president passed on to the Bureau a request from Mr Rodríguez García-Caro, rapporteur for the opinion SOC/478, that the examination of this opinion be postponed to the next plenary session.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvor Jacek Krawczyk gav udtryk for, at det nok ville blive nødvendigt at nedsætte en lille gruppe af medlemmer, som kunne deltage i udarbejdelsen af gennemførelsesbestemmelserne for medlemmernes kommende finansielle vilkår.
In the ensuing discussion, Mr Krawczyk said that he thought it would be necessary to set up a small group of members to take part in drawing up the implementing rules for the future Members' Financial Statute.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvor Janos Toth fremhævede den vellykkede konference, som var blevet afholdt i Budapest i samarbejde med det ungarske nationale økonomiske og sociale råd.
A discussion then followed on the subject, during which Mr Toth spoke of the success of the Budapest conference, which had been organised jointly with the Hungarian ESC.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvor Joost van Iersel tog ordet for at spørge, om det kommende nederlandske formandskab af egen drift havde formuleret disse forslag, som efter hans mening snarere lignede anmodninger om initiativudtalelser.
A discussion followed, during which Mr van Iersel took the floor to question whether the incoming Dutch presidency had spontaneously drawn up these proposals, which, in his view, were more akin to requests for own-initiative opinions.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvor Malgorzata Niepokulczycka, Göke Frerichs, Roger Briesch, Jan Simons, Leif E. Nielsen, Clare Carroll, Staffan Nilsson, Andrzej Adamczyk, Karin Alleweldt, David Stulik, Peter Boldt, Eva Belabed, Erika Koller, Ludvik Jírovec, Ivan Voles og Jean‑Paul Bastian tog ordet.
The introduction was followed by a debate that Ms Niepokulczycka, Mr Frerichs, Mr Briesch, Mr Simons, Mr Nielsen, Ms Carroll, Mr Nilsson, Mr Adamczyk, Ms Alleweldt, Mr Stulik, Mr Boldt, Ms Belabed, Ms Koller, Mr Jirovec, Mr Voles and Mr Bastian participated in.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvor Pierre-Jean Coulon spurgte, hvordan EØSU var placeret i Huset for Europæisk Historie, som næstformanden lige havde meddelt skulle indvies i november 2016.
A debate ensued in which Mr Coulon asked about the place given to the EESC in the House of European History which the vice-president had just said would be inaugurated in November 2016.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvori deltog Joost van Iersel, Filip Hamro-Drotz, Paul Barros Vale og Panayotis Anastopoulos, som redegjorde nærmere for Kommissionens lovgivnings- og arbejdsprogram, og generalsekretæren, der besvarede talernes anmodninger om nærmere forklaringer.
This was followed by a debate in which Mr Van Iersel, Mr Hamro Drotz and Mr Barros Vale took part; in addition, Mr Anastopoulos clarified some aspects of the Commission's legislative and work programme, and the Secretary-General responded to the speakers' requests for information.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvori Göran Lagerholm, Henrik Fallesen, Edgardo Maria Iozia, Henriks Danusevics, Bruno Vever, Jan Oravec, Joost van Iersel, Ernst Erik Ehnmark, Olivier Derruine, Dick Westendorp og Bryan Cassidy deltog.
Mr Lagerholm, Mr Fallesen, Mr Iozia, Mr Danusēvičs, Mr Vever, Mr Oravec, Mr van Iersel, Mr Ehnmark, Mr Derruine, Mr Westendorp and Mr Cassidy took part in the ensuing debate.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvorunder Georgios Dassis undrede sig over den måde, hvorpå budgetgruppen havde truffet afgørelse om definition af kategorien "institutionelle forpligtelser" (dokument R/CESE 27/2012 pkt. 6 a.1), s. 3), og foreslog, at sekretariatet får til opgave at udarbejde et diskussionspapir herom.
A debate then followed, during which Mr Dassis expressed his surprise at the way in which the budget group had taken over a decision on the definition of the "institutional obligations" category (Document R/CESE 27/2012 item 6.a.1), p. 3), and proposed that the secretariat be instructed to prepare a discussion paper on this subject.
Herefter fulgte en debat, hvorunder Joost van Iersel, Evelyne Pichenot, og Agnes Cser tog ordet.
A debate followed, involving Mr Van Iersel, Ms Pichenot and Ms Cser.
Herefter fulgte en debat, som Carmelo Cedrone, Grace Attard og Maureen O'Neill deltog i.
A discussion ensued, involving Mr Cedrone, Ms Attard and Ms O'Neill.
Herefter fulgte en debat.
A debate ensued.
Herefter fulgte en debat.
A debate followed.
Herefter fulgte en debat.
A discussion followed.
Herefter fulgte en debat.
There was then a debate on the subject.
Herefter fulgte en debat.
There was then a discussion.
Herefter fulgte en detaljeret gennemgang af udtalelsen med udgangspunkt i Krzystof Kamienieckis ændringsforslag.
The opinion was then examined page by page on the basis of the amendment proposed by Mr Kamieniecki.
Herefter fulgte en diskussion hvor Georgios Dassis satte spørgsmålstegn ved den i dokumentet indeholdte begrænsning på en ekspert pr. initiativudtalelse.
A discussion ensued during which Mr Dassis questioned the limit of one expert per own-initiative opinion mentioned in the document.
Herefter fulgte en general debat med deltagelse af Bryan Cassidy, Jean-Michel Bloch-Lainé, Janos Tóth, Sergio Santillan, Lars Nyberg, Gérard Dantin, Edgardo Maria Iozia og Luis Miguel Pariza Castaños.
This was followed by a general discussion in which the following members took part: Mr Cassidy, Mr Bloch-Lainé, Mr Toth, Mr Santillan, Mr Nyberg, Mr Dantin, Mr Iozia and Mr Pariza.
Herefter fulgte en general debat med deltagelse af Bryan Cassidy, Sergio Santillán, Edwin Calleja, Viliam Páleník, Lisbeth Baastrup Sørensen og Laure Batut.
A general discussion followed, in which the following took part: Mr Cassidy, Mr Santillan, Mr Calleja, Mr Palenik, Ms Baastrup Sørensen and Ms Batut.
Herefter fulgte en general debat med deltagelse af følgende medlemmer: Carlos Manuel Trindade, Carmelo Cedrone, An Le Nouail Marlière, Pedro Augusto Almeida Freire, Thomas Palmgren, Dumitru Fornea, Gintaras Morkis, Pierre-Jean Coulon, Stefano Palmieri, Ágnes Cser, Jonathan Peel, Filip Hamro-Drotz, Seppo Kallio, Andris Gobiņš, Benedicte Federspiel og Frank van Oorschot.
A general debate followed in which the following members took part: Mr Trindade, Mr Cedrone, Ms le Nouail Marlière, Mr Almeida Freire, Mr Palmgren, Mr Fornea, Mr Morkis, Mr Coulon, Mr Palmieri, Ms Cser, Mr Peel, Mr Hamro Drotz, Mr Kallio, Mr Gobiņš, Ms Federspiel and Mr van Oorschot.
Herefter fulgte en general debat med deltagelse af følgende medlemmer: Christoph Lechner, Pirkko Raunemaa, Liina Carr, Ionuţ Sibian, Arno Metzler, Cveto Stantič, Filip Hamro-Drotz, Pierre-Jean Coulon, Andris Gobiņš, Johannes Kleemann, Seppo Kallio og Jonathan Peel.
A debate followed in which the following members took part: Mr Lechner, Ms Raunemaa, Ms Carr, Mr Sibian, Mr Metzler, Mr Stantič, Mr Hamro-Drotz, Mr Coulon, Mr Gobins, Mr Kleeman, Mr Kallio, and Mr Peel.
Herefter fulgte en general debat med deltagelse af Johannes Kleemann, Joost van Iersel, Marek Komorowski og Viliam Páleník.
A general debate followed, to which Mr Kleeman, Mr van Iersel, Mr Komorowski and Mr Palenik contributed.
Herefter fulgte en general debat med deltagelse af L. F. Van Muiswinkel, Gérard Dantin, Sergio Santillán, Göke Frerichs, Viliam Páleník, Susanna Florio, Harri Koulumies og José Sartorius.
The presentation was followed by a general discussion, in which the following members took part: Mr Van Muiswinkel, Mr Dantin, Mr Santillán, Mr Frerichs, Mr Páleník, Ms Florio, Mr Koulumies and Mr Sartorius.
Herefter fulgte en general debat med deltagelse af Renate Hornung-Draus, Thomas Janson, Emile van Elsen og Johannes Kleemann .
Mrs Hornung-Draus, Mr Thomas Janson, Mr Van Velsen and Mr Kleemann took part in the general discussion which followed.
Herefter fulgte en general debat med deltagelse af Richard Adams, Alfons de Vadder, Arthur Ladrille, Clare Carroll, Dana Stechova, Edwin Calleja, Laure Batut, Peter Boldt, Christer Jansson, Christoforos Koryfidis og Georgios Dassis.
Mr Adams, Mr De Vadder, Mr Ladrille, Ms Carroll, Ms Stechova, Mr Calleja, Ms Batut, Mr Boldt, Ms Janssen, Mr Koryfidis and Mr Dassis spoke in the general discussion.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Batut, Vever, Frerichs og Kommissionens repræsentant, Bougas.
Ms Batut, Mr Vever, Mr Frerichs and Mr Bougas (Commission representative) took part in the general discussion that followed.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Bruno Vever, Laure Batut, Jan Oravec, Marian Krzaklewski, Janos Toth, Joost van Iersel, José Custódio Leirião, Nikolaos Liolios og Manthos Mavrommatis.
The following members took part in the discussion which followed Mr Maystadt's statement: Mr Vever, Ms Batut, Mr Oravec, Mr Krzaklewski, Mr Toth, Mr van Iersel, Mr Leirião, Mr Liolios and Mr Mavrommatis.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Christer Jansson, Grace Attard, Wolfgang Greif, Richard Adams, José Correia, Edwin Calleja, Clare Carroll, Agnes Cser og Dana Stechova, som kom ind på den sociale dialogs rolle, nødvendigheden af, at Kommissionen reviderer alle kønsrelaterede direktiver med henblik på at styrke den sociale beskyttelse af kvinder, og forskellen mellem det at være "selvstændig" og "iværksætter".
Ms Jansson, Ms Attard, Mr Greif, Mr Adams, Mr Correia, Mr Calleja, Ms Carroll, Ms Cser and Ms Stechova spoke in the general discussion, raising points concerning the emphasis to be put on social dialogue, the need for the Commission to review all gender‑related directives in order to strengthen the social protection of women, and the difference between being "self-employed" and "entrepreneur".
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af følgende medlemmer: Dana Štechová, Thomas Janson, Jonathan Peel, Grace Attard, Peder Munch Hansen, Juraj Stern, Göke Frerichs, Lutz Ribbe og Nils Juhl Andreasen.
A general debate followed in which the following members took part: Ms Stechová, Mr Janson, Mr Peel, Ms Attard, Mr Hansen, Mr Stern, Mr Frerichs, Mr Ribbe and Mr Andreasen.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af følgende medlemmer: Smyth, Florio, Burani, Morgan, Cedrone, Sartorius, Nyberg, Nurm, Gendre og Grasso.
A general discussion followed, in which the following members participated: Mr Smyth, Ms Florio, Mr Burani, Mr Morgan, Mr Cedrone, Mr Sartorius, Mr Nyberg, Mr Nurm, Mr Gendre, and Mr Grasso.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Georgios Dassis, Michel Nollet, Thomas Delapina, Harri Koulumies, Joost van Iersel, Wolfgang Greif, Jorge Hay og Göke Frerichs.
A general discussion followed in which the following members took part: Mr Dassis, Mr Nollet, Mr Delapina, Mr Koulumies, Mr van Iersel, Mr Greif, Mr Hay and Mr Frerichs.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Jan Olsson, Harry Byrne, Maud Jansson, Claude Cambus, Algirdas Aleksandras Kvedaravicius, Lucien Bouis, Agnes Cser, Maurizio Angelo, Tatjana Greif og Georgios Dassis, som kom ind på følgende emner:
The following members spoke in the ensuing discussion: Mr Olsson, Mr Byrne, Ms Jansson, Mr Cambus, Mr Kvedaravicius, Mr Bouis, Ms Cser, Mr Angelo, Ms Greif and Mr Dassis.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Kommissionens repræsentant, Bougas, Komorowski, Iozia, Palenik, Frerichs, Mavrommatis og Krzaklewski.
Mr Mendoza’s presentation was followed by a general discussion, in which Mr Bougas (Commission representative), Mr Komorowski, Mr Iozia, Mr Páleník, Mr Frerichs, Mr Mavrommatis and Mr Krzaklewski took part.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Margarita López Almendáriz, Bruno Vever, Juan Mendoza, Arno Metzler, José Custódio Leirião, Bryan Cassidy, Georgios Dassis, Umberto Burani og Hervé Coupeau.
This was followed by a general debate, during which the following members spoke: Ms López Almendáriz, Mr Vever, Mr Mendoza, Mr Metzler, Mr Leirião, Mr Cassidy, Mr Dassis, Mr Burani and Mr Coupeau.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Sergio Santillán Cabeza, Mário Soares, Claude Cambus, Johannes Kleemann, David Sears og Aldona Balsiene.
Mr Santillan, Mr Soares, Mr Cambus, Mr Kleeman, Mr Sears and Ms Balsiene took part in the general discussion that followed.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Thomas Delapina, Harri Koulumies, Francisco João Silva, An Le Nouail og John Donnelly.
That was followed by a general discussion involving Mr Delapina, Mr Koulumies, Mr Silva, Ms Le Nouail and Mr Donnelly.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med indlæg fra Agnes Cser, Daniel le Scornet, Dana Stechova, David Sears, Mário Soares, Wolfgang Greif, Peter Boldt og Georgios Dassis, som bl.a. kom ind på de økonomiske betingelser, jobkvaliteten, social- og arbejdsmarkedspolitikken som et instrument til at opnå økonomisk vækst, behovet for politikker, som sigter mod bekæmpelse af fattigdom, og for integrerede migrations- og flygtningepolitikker, budgetneutralitet samt den holdning, at den social- og arbejdsmarkedspolitiske dagsorden for 2006-2010 er den svageste af Kommissionens meddelelser om social- og arbejdsmarkedspolitikken.
A general discussion then took place, involving Ms Cser, Mr Le Scornet, Ms Stechova, Mr Sears, Mr Soares, Mr Greif, Mr Boldt and Mr Dassis, who spoke of economic conditions, quality of employment, social policy as an instrument to manage economic growth, the need for anti-poverty policies and integrated policies on migration and refugees, budgetary neutrality, and the view that the Social Agenda for 2006-2010 was the weakest of the Commission communications on social policy.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med indlæg fra Herczog, Cser, Pegado Liz, Carroll og Huntjens, der kom ind på følgende punkter: muligheden for anvendelse af udenretslige procedurer og hensigtsmæssigheden af en lovgivning på området.
A general discussion then took place, involving Ms Herczog, Ms Cser, Mr Pegado Liz, Ms Carroll, Mr Huntjens who mentioned the following points: the possible use of out-of-court procedures, and the opportunity for legislation on the subject.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med indlæg fra Hunter, Wahrolin, Viees, Herzog, Hahr, Stechova, Sears, Le Scornet, Jerneck, Bedossa, Carroll og Attard, der var enige om, at fedme var et yderst komplekst problem, som udgjorde en væsentlig udfordring for folkesundheden.
A general discussion then took place, involving Mr Hunter, Ms Wahrolin, Ms Viies, Ms Herczog, Mr Hahr, Ms Stechova, Mr Sears, Mr Le Scornet, Ms Jerneck, Mr Bedossa, Ms Carroll, and Ms Attard who agreed that obesity was an extremely complex problem, which posed a major public health challenge.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med indlæg fra Pichenot, Drbalova, Attard, Greif, Bedossa, Jasinski, Cser og Carroll, der roste ordføreren for dennes arbejde med forslaget til udtalelse.
A general discussion then took place, involving Ms Pichenot, Ms Drbalova, Ms Attard, Mr Greif, Mr Bedossa, Mr Jasinski, Ms Cser and Ms Carroll, who complimented the rapporteur’s work on the draft opinion.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat med indlæg fra Ton Huntjens, Frank Stöhr, Bruno Vever, Paolo Braghin, Paulo Jorge Angelo, José Custódio Leirião, Karin Benz-Overhage, Brenda King, Wilfried Beirnaert, Gérard Dantin, Derek Hunter, Luis Miguel Pariza Castaños og Christoforos Koryfidis.
A general discussion followed, in which the following spoke: Mr Huntjens, Mr Stöhr, Mr Vever, Mr Braghin, Mr Angelo, Mr Leirião, Ms Benz-Overhage, Ms King, Mr Beirnaert, Mr Dantin, Mr Hunter, Mr Pariza and Mr Koryfidis.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat om indholdet af ændringsforslagene fra Gruppe 1, som Irini Pari redegjorde for, og om ændringsforslagene fra Byrne.
A discussion then took place on the subject of the amendments tabled by Group I, which Ms Pari presented, as well as the amendments tabled by Mr Byrne.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat, hvor følgende medlemmer deltog: Cassidy, Burani, Nyberg, Krzaklewski, Toth, Cedrone og Callanan.
A general discussion followed, in which the following members participated: Mr Cassidy, Mr Burani, Mr Nyberg, Mr Krzaklewski, Mr Toth, Mr Cedrone and Mr Callanan.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat, hvor følgende medlemmer deltog: Georgios Dassis, José Sartorius Álvarez de Bohorques, Umberto Burani, Margarita López Almendáriz, Marian Krzaklewski, Susanna Florio, Jan Olsson, Joost van Iersel, Carmelo Cedrone, Göke Frerichs og Carlos Alberto Pereira Martins.
A general discussion followed in which the following members participated: Mr Dassis, Mr Sartorius, Mr Burani, Ms Lopez Almendariz, Mr Krzaklewski, Ms Florio, Mr Olsson, Mr Van Iersel, Mr Cedrone, Mr Frerichs, and Mr Pereira Martins.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat, hvor følgende medlemmer tog ordet: Giuseppe PRICOLO, Wilfred ASPINALL, Rudolf STRASSER, Seppo KALLIO, Joël DECAILLON og Maria Luísa SANTIAGO.
A general debate followed with participation of Mr Pricolo, Mr Aspinall, Mr Strasser, Mr Kallio, Mr Decaillon and Mrs Santiago.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat, hvori deltog Antonello Pezzini, Luis Miguel Pariza Castaños, Thomas Janson, Georgios Dassis, som alle roste udtalelsen og navnlig fremhævede dens humanistiske ånd, dens ligevægt og åbenhed over for studiegruppens holdninger.
The ensuing general discussion saw contributions from Mr Pezzini, Mr Pariza Castaños, Mr Janson and Mr Dassis, all of whom welcomed the opinion, pointing out, for example, its humanist approach, its even-handedness and its inclusion of various positions within the study group.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat, hvori følgende tog ordet: Umberto Burani, William A. Attley, José Sartorius, Edgardo Maria Iozia, Carmelo Cedrone, Peter Morgan og Georgios Dassis.
A general debate followed with the participation of Mr Burani, Mr Attley, Mr Sartorius, Mr Iozia, Mr Cedrone, Mr Morgan and Mr Dassis .
Herefter fulgte en generel debat, hvorunder følgende medlemmer tog ordet:
In the general debate Mr Barabás, Ms Bischoff, Mr Siecker and Mr Pegado Liz took the floor.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat, som P.L.H. Geraads og Rudolf Strasser deltog i.
A general discussion ensued, in which Mr Geraads and Mr Strasser spoke.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat, under hvilken Johannes Kleemann og Dumitru Fornea tog ordet.
A general discussion ensued, in which Mr Kleemann and Mr Fornea spoke.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat, under hvilken Le An Le Nouail Marlière, Vladimíra Drbalová, Luca Jahier, Nicholas Crook, Mário Soares, Filip Hamro-Drotz og Wolfgang Greif tog ordet for at give deres støtte til udtalelsen.
This was followed by a general discussion in which Ms Le Nouail-Marlière, Ms Drbalová, Mr Jahier, Mr Crook, Mr Soares, Mr Hamro-Drotz, and Mr Greif took part.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat.
A general debate followed in which Mr Wolf participated.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat.
A general debate followed.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat.
A general debate then followed:
Herefter fulgte en generel debat.
A general discussion then followed.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat.
Then followed a general debate.
Herefter fulgte en generel debat.
Then followed a general debate:
Herefter fulgte en gennemgang af udtalelsen punkt for punkt.
There then followed a point-by-point discussion of the opinion.
Herefter fulgte en indledende debat i præsidiet om undergruppens foreløbige forslag til informationsrapport om udarbejdelsen af budgettet for 2013.
The Bureau then held a preliminary discussion on the draft information report presented by the Budget Group subgroup.
Herefter fulgte en kort debat med deltagelse af Joost van Iersel og Anastopoulos, Kommissionens repræsentant, der ville undersøge, hvorledes opfølgningsdokumentet kunne forbedres.
A brief discussion ensued during which Mr van Iersel took the floor.
Herefter fulgte en kort debat med deltagelse af Joost Van Iersel og Frederic Adrian Osborn.
There was then a short discussion, in which Mr van Iersel and Mr Osborn spoke.
Herefter fulgte en kort debat om spørgsmål af relevans for konventet.
There was a brief debate on Convention-related issues.
Herefter fulgte en kort debat om ændringsforslaget til punkt 1.1.12, der ligeledes var blevet fremsat af Krzysztof Kamieniecki, men som ikke blev vedtaget:
There followed a short discussion on the amendment to point 1.1.12, which had also been tabled by Mr Kamieniecki but had not been accepted by the rapporteur.