natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Derefter fulgte der en debat med deltagelse af Georgios Dassis, som ønskede at aftalen snarest står klar, og formanden, som efter at have bebudet, at han snart skal mødes med sin modpart i Regionsudvalget, understregede behovet for at styrke EØSU's synlighed i tråd med Regionsudvalgets strategi på området.
This was followed by a discussion involving Mr Dassis, who hoped that the agreement would be concluded in good time, and the President, who said that he had an upcoming meeting with his counterpart at the CoR, and stressed the need to improve the visibility of the EESC, following the example of the strategy implemented by the CoR in this field.
Derefter fulgte der en debat, hvori følgende tog ordet: Jacek Krawczyk, Maureen O'Neill, Grace Attard, Anne-Marie Sigmund, Georgios Dassis, Luca Jahier, Carmelo Cedrone, Arno Metzler og Stéphane Buffetaut.
This was followed by a discussion involving Mr Krawczyk, Ms O'Neill, Ms Attard, Ms Sigmund, Mr Dassis, Mr Jahier, Mr Cedrone, Mr Metzler and Mr Buffetaut.
Derefter fulgte der en generel debat, hvori Maria Luísa Santiago roste den afbalancerede fremstilling i udtalelsen og mindede forsamlingen om, at udtalelsen var vedtaget enstemmigt i NAT-sektionen.
There followed a general discussion, in which Mrs Santiago praised the balance which had been achieved in the opinion under discussion; she reminded the Committee that the opinion had been adopted unanimously by the Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment.
Derefter fulgte en bred drøftelse om at udvide de krav, der skal foreslås præsidiet.
There followed a broad debate on the extent of the demands to be submitted to the Bureau.
Derefter fulgte en bred høring af alle interesserede parter i EU om forskellige muligheder for en fælles strategi for visse nummereringsaspekter med henblik på at nå frem til et konkurrencedygtigt, liberaliseret indre marked for telekommunikation.
This resulted in wide ranging consultation with all interested parties within the EU on a variety of options for a common approach towards certain numbering issues in order to reach the agreed goals of a competitive and liberalized telecommunications market.
Derefter fulgte en debat med deltagelse af An Le Nouail, Henri Malosse, Paulo Andrade, José Bento Gonçalves og Jan Olsson.
Mrs Le Nouail, Mr Malosse, Mr Andrade, Mr Bento Gonçalves and Mr Olsson spoke during the subsequent discussion.
Derefter fulgte en debat med deltagelse af Burani, Bedossa og Carroll om følgende aspekter:
There followed a discussion in which Mr Burani, Mr Bedossa and Mr Carroll made contributions on the following aspects:
Derefter fulgte en debat med deltagelse af EØSU-medlemmerne Pichenot, Pesci, Soares, Geraads og Nielsen om følgende punkter:
A general debate followed, in which Ms Pichenot, Mr Pesci, Mr Soares, Mr Geraads and Mr Nielsen spoke on the following points:
Derefter fulgte en debat med deltagelse af følgende medlemmer: Renate Heinisch, Thomas Janson, Richard Adams, Wolfgang Greif, Elżbieta Szadzińska, Laure Batut, Raymond Hencks, Meelis Joost, Lüneborg og Ágnes Cser.
The following members took part in the ensuing discussion: Mr Heinisch, Mr Thomas Janson, Mr Adams, Mr Greif, Ms Szadzińska, Ms Batut, Mr Hencks, Mr Joost, Mr Lüneborg and Ms Cser.
Derefter fulgte en debat med deltagelse af MOBBS, WALKER, PELLARINI og MORGAN.
A debate ensued, in which Mr Mobbs, Mr Walker, Mr Pellarini and Mr Morgan spoke.
Derefter fulgte en debat med deltagelse af Moreno, Zufiaur, Westendorp, Koryfidis, Nyberg, Pesci, Boldt, Pichenot, Carroll, Stern, Ketzmayr, Danusevics, Niepokuczylska, Le Nouail, Stollenberger og Jerneck, som tog følgende punkter op:
The following took part in the ensuing discussion: Mr Moreno, Mr Zufiaur, Mr Westendorp, Mr Koryfidis, Mr Nyberg, Mr Pesci, Mr Boldt, Ms Pichenot, Ms Carroll, Mr Stern, Mr Kletzmayr, Mr Danusevics, Ms Niepokulczycka, Ms Le Nouail, Mr Stöllnberger and Ms Jerneck.
Derefter fulgte en debat med deltagelse af Vasco CAL, SIMPSON, SEPI, PELLETIER, VEVER, KRITZ, OLSSON  og SANCHEZ.
Mr Cal, Mr Simpson, Mr Sepi, Mr Pelletier, Mr Vever, Mr Kritz, Mr Olsson and Mrs Sánchez spoke in the general discussion that followed.
Derefter fulgte en debat med deltagelse af Williams, Wolf og Little.
In the general debate that followed, Mrs Williams, Mr Wolf and Mr Little spoke.
Derefter fulgte en debat med følgende indlæg:
The following discussion ensued:
Derefter fulgte en debat med indlæg af Jacques PE, Lars KRITZ, Peter MORGAN, Manuel ATAÍDE FERREIRA, Bernd RUPP, Johannes JASCHICK, Ulla SIRKEINEN, Bent NIELSEN, John LYONS, Vasco CAL, Camille GIACOMELLI, Leif NIELSEN og José BENTO GONÇALVES.
Mr Pé, Mr Kritz, Mr Morgan, Mr Ataíde Ferreira, Mr Rupp, Mr Jaschick, Mrs Sirkeinen, Mr Neilsen, Mr Lyons, Mr Cal, Mr Giacomelli, Mr  Nielsen and Mr Bento Gonçalves spoke during the ensuing discussion.
Derefter fulgte en debat med indlæg ved Bernd Dittmann, Maureen O'Neill, Grace Attard og Georgios Dassis, og sidstnævnte fastholdt, at dokumentet, som var blevet forelagt præsidiet, var subjektivt og ufuldstændigt.
Mr Dittmann, Ms O'Neill, Ms Attard and Mr Dassis spoke in the discussion which followed.
Derefter fulgte en debat med indlæg ved SEPI, GREEN, LUSTENHOUWER, GAUDER, VEVER, KRITZ og BURANI.
A discussion followed in which Mr Sepi, Mr Green, Mr Lustenhouwer, Mr Gauder, Mr Vever, Mr Kritz and Mr Burani spoke.
Derefter fulgte en debat om budgetpolitikkens prioriteter, navnlig om det hensigtsmæssige i at iværksætte en evaluering af budgetudarbejdelsen.
A discussion ensued on budget policy priorities and, in particular, on the expediency of assessing how budgets were drawn up.
Derefter fulgte en debat om de budgetpolitiske prioriteter med deltagelse af formanden – som understregede, at Europa-Parlamentet med sin holdning til decharge har belønnet EØSU for dets bestræbelser de seneste måneder med at rydde op i budgetforvaltningen – Henri Malosse, som bifaldt de opnåede fremskridt i forbindelse med budgettets gennemsigtighed og godkendelse fra medlemmerne, men understregede, hvor vigtigt det var, at budgettet for 2010 markerede et brud med fortiden, Dassis, som anmodede om en præcisering af henvisningen til en "erklæring om finansielle interesser" i Europa-Parlamentets rapport om dechargeproceduren for budgettet for 2007, Jacek Krawczyk, Dirk Westendorp, Joost van Iersel og Staffan Nilsson, som understregede, at evalueringen af det arbejde, som det havde været muligt at udføre i 2008, trods vanskeligheder ikke måtte betragtes som negativ, og vurderede, at et langt mere grundlæggende problem er manglen på incitamenter i den generelle opstilling af EU's budget for at sikre en rationel og stram udnyttelse af de tilgængelige resurser.
A debate followed on the priorities of budget policy, in which the following members participated: the President, who emphasised that the European Parliament's position on the subject of discharge bore out the Committee's efforts over the previous month to ensure sound budget management; Mr Malosse, who welcomed the progress which had been made towards transparency and ownership of the budget by members, but emphasised the need for a new beginning in the 2010 budget; Mr Dassis, who called for a clarification of the reference to a "declaration of financial interest" in the European Parliament's report on the discharge of the 2007 budget; Mr Krawczyk, Mr Westendorp, Mr van Iersel and Mr Nilsson, who, in spite of the difficulties, emphasised that the activities carried out in 2008 should not be seen in a negative light, and felt that a fundamental problem was the lack of incentives in the general structure of the EU budget to encourage rational and economic use of the available resources.
Derefter fulgte en debat om forberedelsen af dechargeproceduren for udvalgets budget.
A debate followed on the preparation of the procedure for the Committee budget discharge.
Derefter fulgte en debat om gennemgang af udtalelsen om ”Tjenesteydelser i det indre marked” (INT/228), hvor formanden mindede om, at Kommissionens formand har påtaget sig at fastholde dette direktivforslag til trods for, at flere medlemsstater har givet udtryk for forbehold, og at der i Europa-Parlamentet er blevet indgivet et stort antal ændringsforslag.
A discussion then took place regarding the opinion on Services in the Internal Market (INT/228), during which the president said that despite the reservations expressed by several Member States and the numerous amendments tabled by the European Parliament, the president of the Commission was committed to the draft directive.
Derefter fulgte en debat om kommunikationsgruppens forskellige prioriteter med deltagelse af formanden og Westendorp, Kurki, Tóth og Dassis, Kvedaraité og Pari, som svarede på de kommentarer, de havde modtaget fra medlemmerne.
A debate followed on the various priorities of the Communication Group involving the President, Mr Westendorp, Ms Kurki, Mr Tóth, Mr Dassis, Ms Kvedaraité and Ms Pari, who responded to the members' comments.
Derefter fulgte en debat om kommunikationspolitikken med deltagelse af Gustav Zöhrer, Filip Hamro-Drotz, Roman Haken, formanden et Irini Ivoni Pari, som svarede på de forskellige debattørers kommentarer.
A debate ensued on communication policy, involving Mr Zöhrer, Mr Hamro-Drotz, Mr Haken, the president and Ms Pari; Ms Pari responded to the comments made.
Derefter fulgte en debat om programmets indhold med deltagelse af Staffan Nilsson, som forklarede, at den udgave af programmet, som var blevet forelagt præsidiets medlemmer, ikke var en endelig udgave, og at der endnu kunne blive foretaget tilføjelser.
Mr Nilsson explained that the version submitted to Bureau members was not a definitive version of the programme, to which additions might still be made.
Derefter fulgte en debat om situationen i Kosovo, hvor følgende deltog: Jarosław Mulewicz, Carmelo Cedrone, Miklós Barabás, Göke Frerichs, Eva Belabed og An Le Nouail Marlière.
A discussion on the situation in Kosovo followed in which Mr Mulewicz, Mr Cedrone, Mr Barabas, Mr Frerichs, Ms Belabed and Ms Le Nouail Marlière participated.
Derefter fulgte en debat om, hvorvidt det var hensigtsmæssigt at reagere over for Den Europæiske Ombudsmand, og om hvilken instans der er bedst placeret til at gøre det.
A discussion then followed on the usefulness of responding to the European Ombudsman and on the issue of which authority was most qualified to deal with this matter.
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvor følgende personer tog ordet: Carlos Trias Pintó, der mindede om vigtigheden af en klar kompetencefordeling mellem CCMI og sektionerne, Dilyana Slavova og Luca Jahier – der takkede udvalgets formand og generalsekretæren for at have udnyttet alle muligheder for at fremskynde udarbejdelsen af sonderende udtalelser på anmodning fra det italienske rådsformandskab.
The following members took part in the debate which followed: Mr Trias Pintó, who emphasised the importance of a clear division of responsibilities between the CCMI and the sections; Ms Slavova; and Mr Jahier, who thanked the Committee president and secretary-general for having looked at all possible options for speeding up the drafting of exploratory opinions requested by the Italian Council Presidency.
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvor Georgios Dassis udtrykte ønske om, at blokeringerne fra visse nationale delegationer i Rådet, der går imod det nye forslag til medlemmernes mandatvilkår endelig overvindes, i og med at de tilpasninger, EØSU har indført, nøjagtigt svarer til de anbefalinger, Europa-Parlamentet har fremsat.
A discussion followed during which Mr Dassis took the floor to express the hope that it would finally be possible to overcome the stalemate imposed by a number of national delegations at the Council who were opposed to the new proposal for the members' financial statute since the modifications introduced by the EESC corresponded exactly to the recommendations put forward by the European Parliament.
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvor Georgios Dassis, Henri Malosse og Dimitris Kittenis tog ordet.
Mr Dassis, Mr Malosse and Mr Kittenis then spoke.
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvor Joost van Iersel tog ordet for at lykønske ordføreren og spørge, om dette direktiv skulle opfattes som et incitament til at relancere atomkraften i Europa eller som et rent teknisk forslag.
In the following debate, Mr Van Iersel took the floor in order to congratulate the Rapporteur and asked if this directive should be considered as an incentive for "re-launching" the nuclear energy in Europe or as a purely technical proposal.
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvor Robert Moreland tog ordet for at sige, at han beklagede, at todækkerkøretøjerne er omfattet af undtagelsesbestemmelserne.
A discussion followed involving Mr Moreland, who regretted the use of derogations for double decker buses.
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvori Drotz, Sánchez Miguel, King, van Iersel, Nilsson, Darmanin og Turnhout deltog.
A debate was then held and the following spoke: Mr Hamro-Drotz, Ms Sánchez Miguel, Ms King, Mr van Iersel, Mr Nilsson; Ms Darmanin and Ms van Turnhout.
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvori følgende deltog: Jacek Krawczyk, som anførte behovet for en strategisk og politisk debat, navnlig hvad angår oprettelsen af strukturer under REX-sektionen, José Maria Zufiaur Narvaiza, som tilføjede nogle flere oplysninger, samtidig med at han bekræftede behovet for en dybtgående debat i sektionen om de strategiske behov knyttet til de nye organer, Georgios Dassis, som mente, at præsidiet straks kunne træffe afgørelse uden at dette er til hinder for eventuelle senere ændringer, Carmelo Cedrone, som gik ind for en eventuel oprettelse af en struktur helliget ØMU'en, Maureen O'Neill og Grace Attard.
A debate ensued in which Mr Krawczyk argued that a strategic and political debate was needed, particularly with regard to the establishment of structures under REX auspices, Mr Zufiaur provided additional information, while confirming that an in-depth debate was needed within the section on the strategic requirements relating to new bodies, Mr Dassis felt that the Bureau could take a decision immediately without prejudice to possible subsequent amendments, Mr Cedrone discussed the possible creation of a body focusing on EMU, and Ms O'Neill and Ms Attard also spoke.
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvori følgende medlemmer deltog:
This was followed by a discussion:
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvori Henri Malosse, Paulo Barros Vale, Staffan Nilsson, Mario Sepi, Luca Jahier og Seppo Kallio deltog, og hvorpå præsidiet accepterede forslaget.
After a discussion involving Mr Malosse, Mr Barros Vale, Mr Nilsson, Mr Sepi, Mr Jahier and Mr Kallio, the Bureau welcomed this proposal.
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvorunder Georgios Dassis foreslog vedtagelse af dokumentets første og andet afsnit og at drøfte det tredje afsnit for at nå til enighed om en fremgangsmåde.
There followed a debate, during which Mr Dassis suggested adopting the first and second chapters of the document and submitting the third to discussion, in order to find an agreement on the procedure to be followed.
Derefter fulgte en debat, hvorunder Jacek Krawczyk efterlyste en evaluering af, hvordan fordelingen af EØSU-ansatte i lønklasser er i forhold til fordelingen i sammenlignelige institutioner.
This was followed by a discussion involving Mr Krawczyk, who called for an assessment of how the breakdown of EESC staff by grade corresponded to that in other comparable institutions.
Derefter fulgte en debat, som Malgorzata Niepokulczycka deltog i.
Ms Niepokulczycka took part in the general discussion which followed.
Derefter fulgte en debat, under hvilken Sukhdev Sharma, Paulo Jorge Andrade, Stéphane Buffetaut, Joost van Iersel, Johannes Kleemann og Gerd Wolf stillede spørgsmål til følgende emner:
Ms Sharma, Mr Andrade, Mr Buffetaut, Mr van Iersel, Mr Kleemann and Mr Wolf raised the following points in the ensuing general discussion:
Derefter fulgte en debat.
The presentation was followed by a discussion.
Derefter fulgte en detaljeret gennemgang af rapporten.
There followed a detailed examination of the report.
Derefter fulgte en detaljeret gennemgang af teksten, hvorunder José María Espuny Moyano præsenterede Pedro Barato Trigueros ændringsforslag.
The opinion was then examined point by point: Mr Espuny Moyano presented the amendments tabled by Mr Barato Triguero.
Derefter fulgte en diskussion af kravene til forvaltningen af EØSU's budget med deltagelse af Henri Malosse - som nævnte, at det var nødvendigt at underkaste de senere års mangler en ekstern revision – og Georgios Dassis, som understregede, at den afgående formand for budgetgruppen ikke bør holdes ansvarlig for disse mangler, som strækker sig over flere år - Staffan Nilsson, som påpegede, at omfanget af de senere måneders budgetproblemer ikke burde overvurderes, selv i det tilfælde at præsidiet i fremtiden skulle vælge at føre skærpet tilsyn med udviklingen i udgifterne, Jacek Krawczyk, Gustav Zöhrer, Leila Kurki, Bernardo Hernández Bataller, Andréas Louroutziatis og Joost van Iersel.
A discussion ensued on the overriding considerations of the management of the Committee's budget, involving the following members: Mr Malosse who said that the dysfunctions of recent years should be subjected to an external audit, Mr Dassis who said that the outgoing budget group president should not be held responsible for these dysfunctions which went back several years, Mr Nilsson who said that the scope of the budgetary problems of the last months should not be overestimated, although in future the Bureau should monitor expenditure more carefully, Mr Krawczyk, Mr Zöhrer, Ms Kurki, Mr Hernández Bataller, Mr Louroutziatis and Mr van Iersel.
Derefter fulgte en diskussion med andre interesserede delegationer.
A discussion followed with other interested delegations.
Derefter fulgte en diskussion med deltagelse af følgende medlemmer: Florio, Pichenot, Jahier, Callanan, Etty, Cedrone, Kallio, Frerichs, Le Nouail og Cappellini.
A general discussion ensued in which Ms Florio, Ms Pichenot, Mr Jahier, Mr Callanan, Mr Etty, Mr Cedrone, Mr Kallio, Mr Frerichs, Ms Le Nouail and Mr Cappellini spoke.
Derefter fulgte en drøftelse af ændringsforslaget, hvor Michael MOBBS, Jöel DECAILLON og ordføreren tog ordet.
A discussion of the proposed amendment followed in which Mr MOBBS, Mr DECAILLON and the RAPPORTEUR spoke.
Derefter fulgte en drøftelse med forsamlingen.
A discussion with the Assembly then ensued.
Derefter fulgte en fremadrettet evaluering1 af de sandsynlige økonomiske, sociale og miljømæssige virkninger tillige med spørgsmålet om relevans, effektivitet, sammenhæng og accept af de forskellige definerede politiske løsningsmodeller.
It was followed by a prospective evaluation1 of the likely economic, social and environmental impacts as well as the effectiveness, efficiency, coherence and acceptability of different defined policy options.
Derefter fulgte en general debat med deltagelse af Harri Koulumies, Gérard Dantin, Peter Coldrick, Lars Nyberg, Joost van Iersel, Wolfgang Greif, Michel Nollet og Bruno Vever.
This was followed by a general debate, in which the following members spoke: Mr Koulumies, Mr Dantin, Mr Coldrick, Mr Nyberg, Mr Van Iersel, Mr Greif, Mr Nollet and Mr Vever.
Derefter fulgte en general debat med deltagelse af Peter Coldrick, Göran Lagerholm, Jaroslaw Mulewicz, Bruno Vever, Lars Nyberg, Laure Batut, John Simpson, Edgardo Maria Iozia, William Attley, Joseph Ewert, Gérard Dantin, Edwin Calleja og Jean-Michel Bloch-Lainé.
This was followed by a general debate, during which the following people spoke: Mr Coldrick, Mr Lagerholm, Mr Mulewicz, Mr Vever, Mr Nyberg, Mrs Batut, Mr Simpson, Mr Iozia, Mr Attley, Mr Ewert, Mr Dantin, Mr Calleja and Mr Bloch-Laine.
Derefter fulgte en general debat, hvorunder Vítor Melícias mindede om den udtalelse om erstatning til ofre for kriminalitet fra 2002, han havde været ordfører på, og om sit arbejde for ofre.
A discussion ensued, during which Mr Melícias referred to the 2002 opinion on compensation for crime victims, for which he had been rapporteur, as well as his commitment to victim support.
Derefter fulgte en general debat, med deltagelse af: Renate Heinisch, Vladimíra Drbalová, Luca Jahier, Jonathan Peel, Irini Ivoni Pari, Evelyne Pichenot, Laure Batut, Teresa Costa Macedo, Soscha zu Eulenburg, Christa Schweng og Waltraud Klasnic, som kom ind på spørgsmål om familiepolitik, samspillet mellem økonomisk politik og socialpolitik, den ny sociale dagsorden, udenrigshandel, den tværgående sociale klausul i Lissabontraktaten, social integration og behovet for en deltagende socialpolitik i trit med markedsudviklingen.
Ms Heinisch, Ms Drbalová, Mr Jahier, Mr Peel, Ms Pari, Ms Pichenot, Ms Batut, Ms Costa Macedo, Ms zu Eulenburg, Ms Schweng and Ms Klasnic spoke in the general debate raising issues concerning family policy, economic and social policy interdependence, the new social agenda, external trade, the transversal social clause in the Lisbon Treaty and social inclusion, the need for a participatory social policy in pace with market developments.
Derefter fulgte en general debat.
A general discussion then followed.
Derefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af  Leif Nielsen, Staffan Nilsson, María Sánchez Miguel, Maria Luisa Santiago, A.A. Jaarsma, Adalbert Kienle, Giuseppe Pricolo, Ann Davison, Giorgio Liverani, José Bento Gonçalves, Niall Meghen, Daniel Retureau, Joseph Ballé, Seppo Kallio og Rudolf Strasser.
The explanation of the text by the rapporteur, Mr Gardner, was followed by a general discussion in which Mr L. Nielsen, Mr Nilsson, Mrs Sanchez, Mrs Santiago, Mr Jaarsma, Mr Kienle, Mr Pricolo, Mrs Davison, Mr Liverani, Mr Bento Gonçalves, Mr Meghen, Mr Retureau, Mr Balle, Mr Kallio and Mr Strasser participated.
Derefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Adrien Bedossa, Clare Carroll, An Le Nouail, Jorge Pegado Liz, Laure Batut, Ton Huntjens, Luca Jahier, Edwin Calleja, Brenda King, som bakkede op om udtalelsen.
There followed a general debate, during which the following members spoke: Mr Bedossa, Ms Carroll, Ms Le Nouail, Mr Pegado Liz, Ms Batut, Mr Huntjens, Mr Jahier, Mr Calleja, and Ms King.
Derefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af An Le Nouail Marlière, Jorge Pegado Liz, Edwin Calleja, Luis Miguel Pariza Castaños og Evelyn Regner, der berørte følgende emner: vigtigheden af at bekæmpe enhver form for ulovligt arbejde uanset arbejdstagerens nationalitet, sammenhængen mellem hhv. udtalelsen og direktivforslaget og udvalgets holdning til immigration, støtte til Kommissionens forslag til trods for visse betænkeligheder.
The ensuing general discussion saw contributions from Ms Le Nouail-Marlière, Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Calleja, Mr Pariza Castaños and Ms Regner, who raised the following points: the importance of dealing with all undeclared work, whatever the nationality of the worker, consistency of the opinion and the proposal for a directive with the Committee's positions on immigration, support for the Commission proposal, although with some reservations.
Derefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af BENTO GONÇALVES, SCHMITZ, FRERICHS, MEGHEN og SIMPSON.
The presentation was followed by a general discussion in which the following participated: Mr Bento Goncalves, Mr Schmitz, Mr Frerichs, Mr Meghen and Mr Simpson.
Derefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Bernard Boussat, José Bento Gonçalves, Filip Hamro-Drotz, Giacomina Cassina, Göke Frerichs, Dario Mengozzi, Eva Belabed, John Little, Klaus Schmitz, Niall Meghen, John Svenningsen og Soscha zu Eulenburg.
A general discussion followed in which the speakers were Mr Boussat, Mr Bento Gonçalves, Mr Hamro-Drotz, Mrs Cassina, Mr Frerichs, Mr Mengozzi, Mrs Belabed, Mr Little, Mr Schmitz, Mr Meghen, Mr Svenningsen and Mrs zu Eulenberg.
Derefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Brenda King, Grace Attard, Dana Štechová, Corrado Rossitto, Susanna Florio, An Le Nouail Marlière, som fremhævede udtalelsens værdi og balance.
The ensuing general discussion saw contributions from Ms King, Ms Attard, Ms Štechová, Mr Rossitto, Ms Florio and Ms Le Nouail-Marlière who expressed their appreciation for the opinion, highlighting its balanced nature.
Derefter fulgte en generel debat med deltagelse af Bruno Vever.
This was followed by a general debate, during which Mr Vever spoke.