natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Domstolen fastslog, at det er uforeneligt med fri bevægelighed for kapital, når en bestemmelse om gaveafgift (og arveafgift) indebærer, at fradraget for gavegivers børn, i et tilfælde, hvor alle parter er ikke-bosiddende, er lavere, end hvis en af dem er bosiddende.
The Court declared incompatible with free movement of capital a gift (and inheritance) tax provision according to which the tax allowance for children of the donor, in a case where all parties are non-resident, is lower than where one of them is resident.
Domstolen fastslog, at det var forkert af Kommissionen at sammenligne den rentesats på 9%, der rent faktisk blev betalt, med den normale markedsrente for banklån i stedet for at se på de rentesatser, en privat kreditor i en sammenlignelig situation ville forlange og som sandsynligvis ville være lavere end disse markedssatser.
The Commission, the Court held, was wrong in comparing the interest rate of 9%, which was actually paid, with normal market rates for bank loans instead of looking at the rates a private creditor in a comparable situation would ask for, which presumably would be lower than those market rates.
Domstolen fastslog, at dette ikke kan sammenlignes med tildeling af lån til kriseramte virksomheder.
The Court held that this cannot be compared with the granting of loans to undertakings in difficulties.
Domstolen fastslog, at direktivets artikel 7 ikke tillader medlemsstaterne at udvide de tjenester, der er reserveret for den befordringspligtige virksomhed ved at gøre ekspedition af egen post121 afhængig af en eller flere af følgende betingelser:
The ECJ clarified that Article 7 of the Directive does not permit Member States to extend the services reserved for the universal service provider by making self-provision121 subject to any of the following conditions:
Domstolen fastslog, at eftersom Kommissionen ikke havde fremlagt oplysninger eller beviser, der underbyggede påstandene om, at Yassin Abdullah Kadi var involveret i aktiviteter i tilknytning til international terrorisme (påstande, som han på det stærkeste tilbageviste), berettigede disse påstande ikke, at der på EU-plan blev vedtaget restriktive foranstaltninger mod ham.
The Court stated that, since no information or evidence had been produced by the Commission to substantiate the allegations that Mr Kadi was involved in activities linked to international terrorism (allegations he strongly denied), those allegations did not justify the adoption, at EU level, of restrictive measures against him.
Domstolen fastslog, at en afgørelse om tilstrækkeligt beskyttelsesniveau er betinget af, at Kommissionen finder, at der i det berørte tredjeland er et beskyttelsesniveau for personoplysninger, som "i det væsentlige svarer til" det niveau, der er sikret inden for EU i medfør af direktivet, sammenholdt med chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder, omend det ikke nødvendigvis er identisk med dette niveau.
The Court held that an adequacy decision was conditional on a Commission finding that — in the non-EU country concerned — there is a level of protection of personal data that, while not necessarily identical, is ‘essentially equivalent’ to that guaranteed in the EU by virtue of the Directive, as read in the light of the Charter.
Domstolen fastslog, at en sådan lovgivning er i strid med bestemmelserne om fri bevægelighed for kapital, fordi anvendelsen af en længere forældelsesfrist for arvinger, der har aktier i et selskab, hvis faktiske ledelse befinder sig i udlandet, kan afholde personer, der er bosiddende i beskatningsmedlemsstaten, fra at investere eller bevare investeringer i aktiver, der befinder sig uden for den pågældende medlemsstat.
The Court stated that such legislation is contrary to the provisions on free movement of capital, because the application of a longer limitation period to heirs holding shares in a company which has centre of effective management abroad may have the effect of deterring residents of the taxing Member State from investing or maintaining investments in assets situated outside that Member State.
Domstolen fastslog, at en sådan lovgivning var i strid med artikel 86, stk. 1, sammenholdt med artikel 82, hvis den påvirkede samhandelen mellem medlemsstaterne, da der blev skabt en situation, hvor den etablerede virksomhed, der havde eneret, ikke kunne undgå at misbruge sin dominerende stilling ved at modtage betaling for tjenester, som den ikke selv havde udført.
The Court stated that, in so far as trade between Member States may be affected, such legislation was contrary to Article 86(1) in conjunction with Article 82 since it created a situation in which the incumbent undertaking enjoying the exclusive right could not avoid abusing its dominant position by receiving payment for services which it had not supplied.
Domstolen fastslog, at forordning (EF) nr. 1896/2006 skal fortolkes således, at procedurerne i forordningens artikel 16-20 ikke finder anvendelse, når det viser sig, at et europæisk betalingspåkrav ikke er blevet forkyndt i overensstemmelse med de mindstestandarder, der er fastsat i forordningens artikel 13-15.
The Court ruled that Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 must be interpreted as meaning that the procedures laid down in Articles 16 to 20 of the Regulation are not applicable where it appears that a European order for payment has not been served in a manner consistent with the minimum standards laid down in Articles 13 to 15 of the Regulation.
Domstolen fastslog, at Gena Ivanova Cholakova ikke havde vist tegn på, at hun havde til hensigt at forlade bulgarsk område, så sagen var udelukkende af national karakter.
The Court held that, as Mrs Cholakova had not shown an intention to leave Bulgarian territory, the case was of a purely national nature.
Domstolen fastslog, at ikke-erhvervsaktive unionsborgere, der har lovligt ophold i en anden medlemsstat, på grund af deres unionsborgerskab har ret til ligebehandling med medlemsstatens egne statsborgere.
It affirmed that economically inactive Union citizens who are legally resident in another Member State are entitled, by virtue of their status as Union citizens, to equal treatment with nationals.
Domstolen fastslog, at med en andel af denne størrelse får disse personer en sådan indflydelse på beslutningerne i det omhandlede selskab, at de har kunnet træffe afgørelse om dets drift.
The Court found that a share of this size gave those persons influence over the decisions of the company concerned and made it possible for them to decide upon its activities.
Domstolen fastslog, at medlemsstaterne handlede ulovligt ved at indgå bilaterale aftaler, der indebærer forskelsbehandling mellem Fællesskabets luftfartsselskaber på grundlag af deres ejeres nationalitet.
The Court found that Member States acted illegally in agreeing bilateral agreements that discriminate between Community air carriers on the basis of the nationality of their owners.
Domstolen fastslog, at medlemsstaterne ifølge bestemmelserne om fri bevægelighed for kapital ikke må anvende en lovgivning, som har et specielt favorabelt værdiansættelsessystem og delvis fritagelse for aktiver, som er beliggende i den pågældende medlemsstat, i modsætning til aktiver, som er beliggende i andre medlemsstater, som bliver evalueret efter normale handelsværdiregler.
The Court ruled that the free movement of capital provisions prohibited Member States' legislation whereby a specially favourable valuation system and partial exemption is applicable to assets located in that Member State, as opposed to assets situated in other Member States, which are evaluated according to normal fair market value rules.
Domstolen fastslog, at når en internettjeneste eller værtsudbyder forpligtes til at installere et filter for at forhindre en overtrædelse af intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder, krænker det udbyderens frihed til at drive sin virksomhed og kundernes ret til beskyttelse af deres personoplysninger og friheden til at modtage eller meddele oplysninger.
The Court declared that obliging an internet service or hosting provider to install a filtering system in order to prevent an infringement of intellectual property rights would infringe the freedom of the provider to conduct its business, as well as its customers' rights to the protection of their personal data and to receive or impart information.
Domstolen fastslog, at når Kommissionen havde truffet en negativ endelig beslutning om statsstøtte, har medlemsstaten ikke længere ret til at indbringe sagen for Rådet; Rådet har heller ikke længere beføjelser til at godkende denne støtte.
The ECJ held that once the Commission has taken a negative final decision on state aid, the Member State no longer has the right to bring the matter before the Council; nor does the Council have the power anymore to approve this aid.
Domstolen fastslog, at traktatens forbud mod "al forskelsbehandling, der udøves på grundlag af nationalitet", indebærer, at personer i en situation, der er omfattet af EF-retten, skal placeres på fuldstændigt lige fod med statsborgere i den pågældende medlemsstat.
The Court stated that by prohibiting “any discrimination on grounds of nationality” the Treaty requires that persons in a situation governed by Community law must be placed on a completely equal footing with nationals of the Member State.
Domstolen fastslog, at under visse betingelser skal medlemsstater tillade delvis udøvelse af erhvervet efter anmodning fra erhvervsudøveren.
The Court held that Member States must, under certain conditions, allow the partial taking-up of the profession on request of the professional.
Domstolen fastslår i udkastet, at hasteproceduren bl.a. skal finde anvendelse på sager vedrørende anvendelsen af forordningen, hvor det er påkrævet, at der træffes en hurtig afgørelse af, om der foreligger en hindring for varernes frie bevægelighed i en medlemsstat.
The Court recognises that this expedited procedure applies only to disputes involving the application of the Regulation in which a swift decision on the existence of an obstacle to the free movement of goods in a Member State is required.
Domstolen fastslår, at den omstændighed, at en automobilproducent sælger reservedele til højere priser end dem, uafhængige producenter fastsætter for de samme dele, ikke nødvendigvis udgør et misbrug af en dominerende stilling, idet indehaveren af en mønsterret med rette kan gøre krav på et vederlag for de udgifter, han har afholdt med henblik på at udarbejde det registrerede mønster (Domstolen, samme sag).
The more specific case of higher prices being charged by a manufacturer for components than by independent manufacturers does not, according to Court case law, necessarily constitute an abuse, since the proprietor of protective rights may lawfully call for a return on the amounts which he has invested in order to perfect the protected design (Court of Justice, as above).
Domstolen fik forelagt to annullationssøgsmål mod Kommissionens beslutning nr. 2000/237/EF364 og nr. 2000/0240/EF365 af 22. december 1999 og erklærede to spanske støtteordninger (1) til fordel for produktion af grønsager til industriel forarbejdning i første tilfælde samt (2) vedrørende finansiering af driftskapital i andet tilfælde uforenelige med traktaten.
The Court of Justice heard two actions for annulment brought against Commission Decisions 2000/237/EC364 and 2000/240/EC365 of 22 December 1999 declaring incompatible with the Treaty two Spanish aid schemes, one in favour of horticultural products intended for industrial processing, and the other to finance operating capital.
Domstolen finder, at det forhold, at medlemsstaterne kan opretholde en tidsubegrænset undtagelse fra unisex-reglen i artikel 5, stk. 1, betyder, at artikel 5, stk. 2, strider mod gennemførelsen af målsætningen om ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder i forbindelse med beregning af forsikringspræmier og ydelser, hvilket er formålet med direktivet som defineret af lovgiveren på forsikringsområdet, og dermed er det uforeneligt med artikel 21 og 23 i EU's charter om grundlæggende rettigheder.
The Court of Justice considers that by enabling Member States to maintain without temporal limitation an exemption from the unisex rule laid down in Article 5(1), Article 5(2) runs counter to achievement of the objective of equal treatment between men and women in relation to the calculation of insurance premiums and benefits, which is the purpose of the Directive as defined by the legislature in the insurance field, and is therefore incompatible with Articles 21 and 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Domstolen finder, at en effektiv beskyttelse af arbejdstagerne i byggebranchen kan forudsætte, at visse dokumenter holdes til rådighed på byggepladsen eller i det mindste på et sted i værtsmedlemsstaten, der er tilgængeligt og klart defineret for denne stats kontrolmyndigheder, navnlig i mangel af et organiseret system med samarbejde eller udveksling af oplysninger mellem medlemsstaterne, som foreskrevet i artikel 4 i direktiv 96/71.
The Court held that the effective protection of workers in the construction industry may require that certain documents are kept on site, or at least in an accessible and clearly identified place in the territory of the host Member State, so that they are available to the authorities of that State responsible for carrying out checks, particularly where there exists no organised system for cooperation or exchanges of information between Member States as provided for in Article 4 of Directive 96/71.
Domstolen fokuserede på spørgsmålet om på hvilken baggrund Kommissionen vurderer, om der er tale om støtte.
The Court focused on the question of the background against which the Commission had to assess the presence of aid.
Domstolen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber har kompetence til at træffe afgørelse i henhold til voldgiftsklausuler i de aftaler, asylstøttekontoret indgår.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities shall have jurisdiction to give judgment pursuant to any arbitration clause contained in a contract concluded by the Office.
Domstolen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber har præciseret, at denne bestemmelse ikke gælder, når aftalens virkning for handelen mellem medlemsstater eller for konkurrencen ikke er mærkbar.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities has clarified that this provision is not applicable where the impact of the agreement on intra-community trade or on competition is not appreciable.
Domstolen for Den Europæiske Union har lige siden 1997 vist, hvilken vej der skal følges.
In 1997, the European Union Court of Justice indicated the path that should be followed.
Domstolen forkastede Det Forenede Kongeriges argumenter (dom af 12. november 1996).
The Court rejected the UK arguments (judgment of 12 november 1996).
Domstolen forkastede Estlands anbringende vedrørende en tilsidesættelse af proportionalitetsprincippet og fandt, at Estland ikke havde godtgjort, at de forskellige valg, der er truffet af EU-lovgiver, åbenbart har overskredet grænserne for dennes skønsbeføjelser (præmis 32-38).
The Court rejected Estonia’s plea based on a breach of the principle of proportionality, considering that Estonia had not established that the various choices made by the EU legislature manifestly exceeded the limits of its discretion (paragraphs 32 to 38).
Domstolen forkastede også de argumenter, der blev fremført for at anfægte gyldigheden af direktivet under hensyn til princippet om ligebehandling og om forbud mod forskelsbehandling.
Also, the Court turned down the arguments submitted to contest the validity of the Directive in the light of the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination.
Domstolen forklarede i sin dom i Gibraltarsagen, at EU-retten ikke forhindrer, at en medlemsstat udvider valgretten fra ikke blot at omfatte landets egne borgere og andre unionsborgere, der bor på dets område, til også at omfatte andre definerede grupper af personer, der har tæt tilknytning til det.
In its judgment in the Gibraltar case, the Court explained that EU law does not prevent a Member State from extending franchise, beyond its own citizens and EU citizens living on its territory, to other defined categories of persons having close links with it.
Domstolen fortolkede på grundlag af artikel 21 begrebet direkte forskelsbehandling på grund af race eller etnisk oprindelse.
Finally, the Court referred to Article 21 to interpret the concept of direct discrimination based on race or ethnic origin.
Domstolen fortolker fællesskabslovgivningen og udvikler på naturlig vis de ufuldstændige retsbegreber i den forholdsvis nye fællesskabsret til et sammenhængende retssystem13.
The Court interprets Community Law and naturally develops the incomplete legal concepts of relatively young Community Law to a coherent system of law13.
Domstolen fortolker fællesskabslovgivningen og udvikler på naturlig vis de ufuldstændige retsbegreber i den forholdsvis nye fællesskabsret til et sammenhængende retssystem14.
The Court interprets Community Law and naturally develops the incomplete legal concepts of relatively young Community Law to a coherent system of law14.
Domstolen fortsatte med at præcisere, at arbejdsgiverbidragene i en bidragsdefineret erhvervs­tilknyttet social sikringsordning skal være de samme for begge køn.
The Court has gone on to point out that employees' contributions, in a contributory occupational scheme, must be the same for both sexes.
Domstolen fremførte i sin dom om klassificering af et telefonprogram udsendt af det offentlige østrigske tv-selskab ÖRF14, at vurdering af "teleshopping" og "tv-reklame" bør ske på nationalt plan, men den opstillede retningslinjer for fortolkning af de to begreber og anvendelsen af dem.
In its ruling regarding the classification of a phone-in programme broadcast by national public Austrian broadcaster ÖRF14, the Court explained that ‘teleshopping’ or ‘television advertising' should be assessed at national level but it provided guidelines to assist with the interpretation of both concepts and their application.
Domstolen fremhævede også, at forbrugerne er i en sårbar situation, da de risikerer at miste deres hjem.
The CJEU also emphasised the vulnerability of consumers exposed to the risk of losing their home.
Domstolen gav fuldt ud Kommissionen medhold, idet den mente, at den franske ordning ikke overholdt de principper om proportionalitet, objektivitet og gennemsigtighed, som er fastsat i direktiverne, og at Frankrig ligeledes havde overtrådt sine forpligtelser med hensyn til udligning af taksterne.
The Court found entirely in the Commission's favour, holding that the French mechanism did not respect the principles of proportionality, objectivity and transparency required by the directives, and that France had also failed to fulfil its obligations in respect of the rebalancing of tariffs.
Domstolen gav i sin efterfølgende kendelse Kommissionen ret3, og én medlemsstat har nu efterlevet domstolskendelsen.
The European Court of Justice eventually ruled accordingly3 and one Member State has now complied with the Court ruling.
Domstolen gav Kommissionen fuldstændig medhold, idet den fastslog, at det franske system for finansiering af forsyningspligtydelserne ikke overholdt principperne for proportionalitet, objektivitet og gennemsigtighed, der er krævet i direktiverne, og at Frankrig endvidere havde tilsidesat sine forpligtelser til igen at bringe sine tariffer i ligevægt.
The Court ruled entirely in the Commission’s favour, finding that the French legislation on the financing of the universal service did not comply with the principles of proportionality, objectivity and transparency required by the directives, and that France had failed to meet its obligations as regards re‑balancing tariffs.
Domstolen gentog disse principper i en dom af 3. juli 2001, hvori det blev fastslået, at de belgiske myndigheder havde undladt at vedtage de foranstaltninger, der var nødvendige til at inddrive støtten ydet under Maribel a/b-ordningerne354.
On 3 July, the Court reiterated these principles in a judgment declaring that the Belgian authorities had failed to adopt the measures necessary to recover the aid provided for under the Maribel bis/ter schemes.354
Domstolen gentog, at de betingelser, der kan kræves opfyldt ved udstedelse af en opholdstilladelse, er fastsat i de pågældende direktiver, og at disse betingelser er udtømmende.
The Court repeated that the conditions which may be required for the issue of a residence permit are laid down in the respective Directives and are exhaustive in nature.
Domstolen gik imidlertid ikke ind i diskussionen om, hvorvidt en sådan forpligtelse kan henføres under artikel 81, stk. 3.
The Court, however, did not enter the discussion concerning the applicability of Article 81(3) to such an obligation.
Domstolen gik imod den holdning, den tidligere havde indtaget i dommene Lair (39/86) og Brown (197/86) og konkluderede, at studiestøtte til dækning af leveomkostninger er omfattet af traktatens anvendelsesområde for så vidt angår EF-traktatens artikel 12.
The Court reversed the position it had held previously in the Lair (39/86) and Brown (197/86) judgments and concluded that assistance to students to cover their maintenance costs falls within the scope of application of the Treaty for the purposes of Article 12 EC.
Domstolen gjorde det dog klart, at lovgiveren, især i forbindelse med roamingregler, skal basere dennes valg på objektive kriterier.
However, the Court clarified, in particular with regard to rules on roaming, that the legislator must base its choices on objective criteria.
Domstolen gjorde det i sin dom i sag C-106/98 klart, at alle budgetposter skal have et passende retsgrundlag, og at nye budgetdispositioner skal suspenderes, hvis der ikke foreligger et sådant (med undtagelse af nogle begrænsede udgiftskategorier).
The Judgement by the European Court of Justice in case C-106/98 has made it clear that all budget lines must have an appropriate legal base and that in the absence of one, new budgetary commitments must to all intents and purposes be suspended (with the exception of some limited categories of expenditure).
Domstolen gjorde det imidlertid klart i en anden dom51, at finansielle ydelser, der skal lette adgangen til arbejdsmarkedet, ikke kan anses for at være "sociale ydelser", som fastlagt i denne artikel.
However, the CJ made it clear in a further decision51 that financial benefits to facilitate access to the labour market cannot be regarded as constituting ‘social assistance’ within the meaning of that Article.
Domstolen gjorde det også klart, at det ved vurderingen af, om indenlandsk lovgivning om arveafgift er forenelig med EU-retten, ikke er relevant, om der ensidigt er blevet givet en afgiftsfordel af en anden medlemsstat end bopælsmedlemsstaten.
The Court also made clear that, for the purposes of assessing the compatibility with EU law of domestic inheritance tax legislation, the existence of a tax advantage granted unilaterally by a Member State other than the State of residence is not relevant.
Domstolen gjorde opmærksom på, at det ud fra traktatens generelle ordning er klart, at proceduren efter EF-traktatens artikel 88 aldrig må føre til et resultat, der er i strid med traktatens specifikke bestemmelser.
The Court recalled that it was clear from the general scheme of the Treaty that proceedings under Article 88 of the EC Treaty must never produce a result that is contrary to the Treaty’s specific provisions.
Domstolen har accepteret, at der med henvisning til almene hensyn indføres bestemmelser, som sikrer et sammenhængende skattesystem, forudsat at de pågældende bestemmelser ikke er diskriminerende32.
The Court of Justice has accepted this, on the grounds of the general good involved in the cohesion of the tax system, provided these rules are not discriminatory32.
Domstolen har adskillige gange truffet afgørelse om, at en EU-borgers manglende overholdelse af de administrative procedurer vedrørende ophold kun kan straffes på en forholdsmæssig og ikke-diskriminerende måde.
The Court of Justice has ruled several times that the failure by an EU citizen to comply with administrative procedures concerning residence can only be sanctioned in a proportionate and non discriminatory way.