natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Domstolen tilføjer, at særlige eller eksklusive rettigheder vedrørende etablering af offentlige telekommunikationsnet og i givet fald levering af offentlige teletjenester i den i artikel 2 af direktiv 90/387/EØF anførte betydning ikke kan kendetegnes som telekommunikationsorganisationers brug af fortrinsrettigheder, herunder bemyndi-gelsen til at erhverve jordarealer ved ekspropriation, muligheden for at kræve adgang til jordarealer med henblik på at foretage undersøgelser og muligheden for at erhverve jord ved aftaler eller placere netudstyr på, over eller under offentlig vej og placere anlæg på privat grund med rettighedsindehavernes samtykke, idet domstolene kan dispensere fra dette krav, i det omfang disse fortrinsrettigheder, "som blot skal gøre det lettere for de pågældende operatører at etablere net, og som er tildelt eller kan tildeles samtlige operatører, ikke giver rettighedsindehaverne nogen væsentlig fordel i forhold til deres potentielle konkurrenter."
The Court of Justice added that exclusive or special rights for the provision of a public telecommunications network and, where applicable, public telecommunications services within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 90/387/EEC cannot be characterised by the possibility for the authorised telecommunications organisations to enjoy certain prerogatives, in particular the right to acquire land compulsorily, to enter land for exploratory purposes and to acquire land by agreement or to place network equipment in, over or under the public highway and to place apparatus on private land with the consent of the persons having an interest in that land, which consent can be dispensed with by the court, inasmuch as such rights, "which are merely intended to facilitate the provision of networks by the operators concerned and are or may be conferred upon all those operators, do not give their holders any substantial advantage over their potential competitors."
Domstolen tilsluttede sig indirekte den anskuelse, at de tre elementer i definitionen af arbejdstid er kumulative.
The Court of Justice implicitly supported the theory that the three features of the definition of working time were cumulative.
Domstolen traf i 2001 afgørelse om to sager vedrørende manglende gennemførelse af en kommissionsbeslutning.
In 2001, the Court of Justice decided on two actions for non‑implementation of a Commission decision.
Domstolen træffer afgørelse, hvis der opstår tvivl med hensyn til anvendelsen af dette stykke."
In case of doubt as to the application of this paragraph, the Court shall decide."
Domstolen træffer samtidig afgørelse om strafferetlig og civilretlig forfølgning .
The judge gives his rulings both at civil and criminal levels.
Domstolen træffer således afgørelser, som egentlig burde træffes af folkevalgte instanser.
It therefore takes decisions which should be taken by democratically elected authorities.
Domstolen uddy­bede sin holdning i dommen, idet den udelukkede de lovregulerede sociale sikringsordninger fra begrebet ”alle andre ydelser” i henhold til den tidligere artikel 119 (nu artikel 141, stk. 2).
In its judgment in that case, the Court of Justice clarified its position, excluding statutory social security schemes from the concept of "any other consideration" of ex-Article 119 (new Article 141(2)).
Domstolen udelukkede ikke, at der er pligt til at gennemføre direktivet, men fandt, at denne forpligtelse ikke var tilstrækkelig klar på tidspunktet for overtrædelsesprocedurerne.
The Court did not rule out that there is an obligation to implement the Directive but considered that the obligation was not sufficiently clear at the time of the infringement proceedings.
Domstolen udelukker desuden muligheden for, at medlemsstaterne kan bringe studerendes og andre ikke-erhvervsaktives opholdsret til ophør, når de får økonomiske vanskeligheder af midlertidig art.
In addition, the Court excludes the possibility for the Member States to end the right of residence of students and other inactive persons when they encounter temporary financial difficulties.
Domstolen udelukker således kategorisk og i alle tilfælde uden undtagelse, at tildeling af en bistandsydelse automatisk medfører, at opholdsretten bringes til ophør.
The Court of Justice thus categorically excludes in all cases, without exception, any automatic link between recourse to social assistance and end of the right of residence.
Domstolen udsatte den 26. juni 2003 den del af Kommissionens beslutning, der nedlagde forbud mod videreførelse af ordningen for de centre, hvis anerkendelse stod for at udløbe, og det indtil der var truffet afgørelse om sagens genstand257.
On 26 June, the Court of Justice suspended that part of the Commission’s decision which prohibited the renewal of the scheme with respect to centres approaching expiry, pending ajudgment on the substance257.
Domstolen udtalte endvidere, at Kommissionen ved i disse retningslinjer at have redegjort for, hvilken metode den agtede at benytte ved udmåling af bøder, havde holdt sig inden for sine retlige rammer og ikke havde overskredet den skønsbeføjelse, lovgiver tillægger den.
Moreover, the ECJ stated that in setting out in the Guidelines the method which it proposed to apply when calculating fines, the Commission remained within its legal framework and did not exceed the discretion conferred on it by the legislator.
Domstolen udtalte i sag C-205/99, at en så restriktiv procedure som en godkendelsesprocedure er acceptabel, forudsat at den er nødvendig, står i et rimeligt forhold til det tilstræbte formål, bygger på objektive kriterier, der ikke indebærer forskelsbehandling og i forvejen er de berørte virksomheder bekendt.
The Court of Justice, in Case C-205/99, stated that a procedure as restrictive as an authorisation procedure is acceptable provided that it is necessary, proportionate to the aim pursued and based on objective, non-discriminatory criteria which are known in advance to the undertakings concerned.
Domstolen udtalte navnlig i sag C-97/96 Verband Deutsche Daihatsu-Händler23, at der i artikel 50, stk. 2, litra g), i TEUF tales om at beskytte tredjemands interesser, uden at der sondres mellem eller udelukkes kategorier af tredjemænd.
As the Court of Justice held, in particular, in Case C-97/96 Verband deutscher Daihatsu-Händler23 , Article 50(2)(g) TFEU refers to the need to protect the interests of "others" generally, without distinguishing or excluding any categories falling within the ambit of that term.
Domstolen udtalte, at datalagring tjener et legitimt mål af almen interesse, herunder bekæmpelse af grov organiseret kriminalitet, og udgør et hensigtsmæssigt middel til at nå dette mål.
The CJEU ruled that data retention serves a legitimate objective of general interest, namely the fight against serious organised crime, and is an appropriate means for attaining this objective.
Domstolen udtalte, at denne betingelse ikke berører det folkeretlige princip om, at medlemsstaterne har kompetence til at fastsætte betingelserne for erhvervelse og fortabelse af statsborgerskab, men fastslår princippet – når der er tale om unionsborgere – om, at udøvelsen af denne kompetence, i det omfang den berører de rettigheder, der tildeles og beskyttes ved Unionens retssystem, kan underkastes domstolsprøvelse i forhold til EU-retten.
The Court indicated that this proviso does not compromise the principle of international law that the Member States have the power to lay down the conditions for the acquisition and loss of nationality, but rather enshrines the principle that, in respect of citizens of the Union, the exercise of that power, in so far as it affects the rights conferred and protected by the legal order of the Union, is amenable to judicial review carried out in the light of European Union law.
Domstolen udtalte, at henset til den betydning, som den primære EU-ret tillægger unionsborgerskabet, bør de nationale retter tage hensyn til de eventuelle virkninger, denne beslutning har for den berørte person og for hans familiemedlemmer, for så vidt angår fortabelsen af de rettigheder, enhver unionsborger nyder godt af.
The Court stated that, having regard to the importance which primary EU law attaches to the status of citizen of the Union, it is necessary for the national courts to take into account the consequences that the decision entails for the person concerned and for the members of his family with regard to the loss of the rights enjoyed by every citizen of the Union.
Domstolen udtalte, at opholdsretten for tredjelandsstatsborgere, der er ægtefæller til statsborgere i medlemsstaterne, følger direkte af fællesskabsrettens regler, uanset om der udstedes en opholdstilladelse af en medlemsstat.
The Court held that the right of residence for the Community citizens’ spouses who are third‑country nationals is conferred directly by Community rules and not by the issuing of a residence card by a Member State.
Domstolen udtalte, at selvom medlemsstaterne har beføjelser til at fastsætte pensionsalderen, falder anvendelsen heraf til at bringe en arbejdskontrakt til ophør inden for direktivets anvendelsesområde og skal derfor bestå "prøven" i direktivets artikel 6.
According to the Court, while Member States have competence to fix retirement age, its application through termination of the employment contract falls within the scope of the Directive and has therefore to pass the ‘test’ of Article 6 of the Directive.
Domstolen understregede nødvendigheden af at fremføre de faktiske og retlige grunde til, at Kommissionen anser en national bestemmelse for uforenelig med artikel 100 A.
The court stressed the need to justify the de facto and de jure reasons why the Commission considered a national measure to be incompatible with Article 100a.
Domstolen understregede også, at den obligatoriske tilknytning, som er kendetegnende for denne forsikringsordning, er uundværlig for dennes økonomiske balance, såvel som for gennemførelsen af solidaritetsprincippet
The ECJ also stressed that the compulsory nature of membership of the insurance scheme was essential to the scheme’s financial equilibrium and to the application of the solidarity principle.
Domstolen understregede også, at medlemsstaterne i henhold til artikel 7, stk. 4, pkt. 5 i forordning (EØF) 259/93 om overførsel af affald kan gøre indsigelse mod overførsel af affald, “hvis forholdet mellem det affald, der kan nyttiggøres, og det affald, som ikke kan nyttiggøres, den skønnede værdi af de materialer, der endelig nyttiggøres, eller udgifterne til nyttiggørelsen og udgifterne til bortskaffelse af den del, der ikke kan nyttiggøres, ikke begrunder nyttiggørelsen ud fra økonomiske og miljømæssige betragtninger”.
The Court also underlined that pursuant to Article 7(4) fifth indent of Regulation (EEC) 259/93 on shipments of waste, Member States may object to shipments of “if the ratio of the recoverable and non-recoverable waste, the estimated value of the materials to be finally recovered or the cost of recovery and the cost of the disposal of the non-recoverable fraction do not justify the recovery under economic and environmental conditions”.
Domstolen understregede, at "selv om et direktiv […] i sig selv kan skabe forpligtelser for private og derfor ikke som sådan kan påberåbes over for sådanne personer […] gælder dette ikke i en situation, hvor manglende overholdelse af artikel 8 eller artikel 9 i direktiv 83/189, hvilket udgør en væsentlig proceduremangel, medfører, at en teknisk forskrift, der er vedtaget under tilsidesættelse af en af de nævnte artikler, ikke må bringes i anvendelse".
The Court stressed that "Whilst it is true that a directive cannot of itself impose obligations on an individual and cannot therefore be relied on as such against an individual, that case-law does not apply in proceedings between individuals where non-compliance with Article 8 or Article 9 of Directive 83/189, which constitutes a substantial procedural defect, renders a technical regulation adopted in breach of either of those articles inapplicable".
Domstolen understregede, at bekendtgørelsen kun indeholdt forbud mod en markedsføringsmetode, men ikke fastlagde de krævede specifikationer for et produkt, i dette tilfælde sendeudstyr.
The Court emphasised that the decree merely prohibited a marketing method, without laying down the characteristics required of a product, in this case transmitting equipment.
Domstolen understregede, at direktiv 64/221 fastsætter, at medlemsstaten skal træffe beslutning om, hvorvidt der skal udstedes opholdstilladelse, hurtigst muligt og senest seks måneder efter ansøgningen.
The Court stressed that Directive 64/221 provides that the Member State must take a decision on whether to grant a residence permit as soon as possible and in any event not later than six months from the date on which the application was submitted.
Domstolen understregede, at medlemsstaterne er forpligtet til at overholde chartret, når de fastlægger ansvaret for behandling af en asylansøgning.
The Court stressed that Member States are under the obligation to respect the Charter when they establish the responsibility for examining an asylum application.
Domstolen understreger, at den del af kompensationen, der overstiger de nødvendige udgifter forbundet med opfyldelsen af den offentlige tjenesteforpligtelse, kan udgøre statsstøtte, hvilket ikke er tilladt i henhold til artikel 86 i traktaten.
The Court stressed that any compensation amounts over and above costs necessary in order to fulfil a public service obligation could be considered to be state aid, and thus be in breach of Article 86 of the Treaty.
Domstolen understreger, at hvert enkelt tilfælde, hvor der opstår spørgsmål om, hvorvidt en national processuel bestemmelse gør det umuligt eller uforholdsmæssigt vanskeligt at anvende EU-retten, skal bedømmes under hensyn til, hvilken stilling bestemmelsen indtager i den samlede procedure, herunder dens forløb og dens særlige kendetegn, for de forskellige nationale retsinstanser.
The Court stresses that every case in which the question arises as to whether a national procedural provision makes the application of European Union law impossible or excessively difficult must be analysed by reference to the role of that provision in the procedure, its progress and its special features, viewed as a whole, before the various national bodies.
Domstolen undersøger EU-institutionernes hensyntagen til chartret og har afsagt flere domme for at sikre, at EU-institutionerne handler i overensstemmelse med chartret.
The EU institutions’ regard to the Charter is scrutinised by the Court, which delivered several judgments to ensure that the EU institutions act in line with the Charter.
Domstolen undersøger institutionernes egen overholdelse af chartret, idet den kontrollerer, at EU's retsakter er i overensstemmelse med chartret.
The respect of the Charter by the institutions themselves is scrutinised by the Court, which checks the compliance of EU acts with the Charter.
Domstolen undersøger, når der indgives en anmodning, på basis af anmodningsformularen, om kriterierne for, at anmodningen kan antages til realitetsbehandling, er opfyldt, og om kravet synes at være berettiget.
Thus, the court upon receiving an application will examine on the basis of the application form whether the admissibility criteria are met and whether the claim appears to be founded.
Domstolen undersøgte ikke specifikt denne sag i lyset af retten til fri bevægelighed for personer, som er fastlagt i traktaten.
The Court did not specifically examine the case in the light of the right to free movement of persons enshrined in the Treaty.
Domstolen undersøgte, hvorvidt rammeafgørelsen om en europæisk arrestordre40 var forenelig med chartrets artikel 47 og 48.
The Court reviewed the compatibility of the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant40 (EAW) with Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter.
Domstolen undersøgte, om denne særlige ydelse rent faktisk opfyldte betingelserne for ikke at kunne eksporteres til et andet land, var den med andre ord virkelig "særlig" og ikke-bidragspligtig?
The Court examined whether the particular benefit actually satisfied the conditions for non-exportability, in other words was it truly "special" and non-contributory?
Domstolen var enig med Kommissionen og fandt, at Retten havde taget fejl på dette punkt.
The ECJ concurred with the Commission’s view and found that the CFI erred in law in this respect.
Domstolen ventes at begære en ændring af sin statut for at få indsat nærmere bestemmelser om en sådan procedure for fornyet prøvelse, således som der blev opfordret til i erklæring nr. 13 på regeringskonferencen i Nice.
The Court of Justice is expected to come forward with a request to change its Statute introducing further details for such a review procedure as called for in Declaration No 13 adopted by the Nice conference.
domstolen vil afsige en eksigibel afgørelse, medmindre den har modtaget et svarskrift eller en erklæring, som informerer domstolen om betaling af kravet, fra sagsøgte inden for den frist, der er anført i stk. 3.
the court will deliver an enforceable decision unless it has received a statement of defence or a statement informing the court about the payment of the claim from the defendant within the time limit specified in paragraph 3.
Domstolen vil derfor fortsat kun have fuld prøvelsesret vedrørende "klager over beslutninger, hvorved Kommissionen fastsætter en bøde eller en tvangsbøde".
Substantive review by the Court of Justice thus remains limited to "decisions whereby the Commission has fixed a fine or periodic penalty payment".
Domstolen vil fremover kunne blive anmodet om at undersøge andre situationer, der hidtil ikke er blevet behandlet, og i forbindelse med hvilke der i den gældende lovgivning sondres mellem rent nationale situationer og situationer med et grænseoverskridende element.
The Court may in the future be requested to examine other situations not so far addressed, in which the applicable legislation distinguishes between purely national situations and situations with a cross-border element.
Domstolen ville bane vejen, hvis den traf afgørelse herom.
A Court of Justice decision would open the way.
Domstolen vurderede ligeledes, at undtagelsesbestemmelser til princippet om, at sociale sikringsydelser kan eksporteres, såsom bestemmelserne til koordinering af de i artikel 10a i forordning nr. 1408/71 omhandlede særlige ikke-bidragspligtige ydelser, skal fortolkes indskrænkende.
The Court of Justice also considered that derogations from the principle of exportability of social security benefits, such as the provisions coordinating the special non-contributory benefits laid down in Article 10a of Regulation No 1408/71, needed to be interpreted strictly.
Domstolen vurderede, at den luxembourgske moderskabsydelse, der blev indført ved lov af 30. april 1980, og som udbetales til enhver gravid kvinde og enhver kvinde efter nedkomsten på betingelse af, at hun på det tidspunkt, hvor retten erhverves, har fast bopæl i Luxembourg, ikke kan betragtes som en særlig ydelse i forhold til de ydelser, der er opregnet i artikel 4, stk. 1, i forordning nr. 1408/71.
The Court judged that the Luxembourg maternity allowance laid down in the Act of 30 April 1980, being payable to every pregnant woman and every woman who has given birth on the sole condition that she is legally resident in Luxembourg when entitlement is established, cannot be regarded as having, in relation to the benefits referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation No 1408/71, the character of a special allowance.
Domstolen, der bekræf­tede sin tidligere retspraksis (sag C-170/84 Bilka) fremførte, at udelukkelsen af deltids­ansatte arbejdstagere fra medlemskab i en erhvervstilknyttet ordning kan udgøre en indirekte forskelsbehandling af kvinder, hvilket ikke er tilladt ifølge den tidligere artikel 119 i EF-traktaten, medmindre der findes en objektiv begrundelse for en sådan udelukkelse.
The Court, confirming its previous caselaw (Case C-170/84 Bilka), considered that the exclusion of part-time workers from membership of an occupational scheme may constitute indirect discrimination against women prohibited by ex-Article 119 of the EC Treaty if there is no objective justification for such exclusion.
Domstolen, der fulgte generaladvokatens konklusioner, fastslog, at begrebet løn, hvad enten den betales direkte eller indirekte i penge eller naturalier, ikke kan omfatte ydelser i forbindelse med lovregulerede sociale sikringsordninger, medmindre der findes en form for overenskomst inden for den pågældende virksomhed eller erhvervsgren, og at disse ordninger obligatorisk skal gælde for almindelige grupper af arbejdstagere.
The Court, following the conclusions of the Advocate-General, ruled that the concept of consideration paid directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, could not encompass benefits of statutory social security schemes without any element of agreement within the enterprise or the occupational branch concerned, and obligatorily applicable to general categories of workers.
Domstolen, der påbegyndte sit arbejde i juli 2005, er ansvarlig for sager, der involverer organiseret kriminalitet, grov økonomisk kriminalitet og lovovertrædelser begået af visse kategorier af embedsmænd.
The Court, which started its work in July 2005, is responsible for cases involving organised crime, serious economic crimes and crimes committed by certain categories of officials.
Domstolen, Revisionsretten, Det Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg, Regionsudvalget og Ombudsmanden kan hver udnævne en intern revisor i overensstemmelse med stk. 1.
The Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the Ombudsman may each appoint an internal auditor in accordance with paragraph 1.
Domstolen1 har udtrykkelig anerkendt Fællesskabets beføjelser til at lovgive for det nukleare sikkerhedsområde, der hører under Euratom-traktaten afsnit II, kapitel 3.
The Court of Justice1 explicitly recognised the Community’s power to legislate in the field of nuclear safety under Chapter 3 of Title II of the Euratom Treaty.
Domstolen14 fastslår:
According to the Court14
Domstolen20 anfører følgende betingelser, som skal opfyldes kumulativt:
These conditions, listed cumulatively by the Court20, are as follows:
Domstolen257 bekræftede for første gang Kommissionen i den opfattelse, at når de offentlige myndigheder tillader en debitorvirksomhed, der er ophørt med at opfylde sine forpligtelser, at videreføre sine aktiviteter, kan det under visse omstændigheder - som for eksempel i den foreliggende sag - føre til en konklusion om ulovlig statsstøtte.
For the first time the Court of Justice confirmed257 the Commission’s view that the behaviour of public authorities with respect to a debtor company having ceased to honour its obligations, consisting in allowing it to pursue its activities, may, under certain circumstances such as in the case in point, lead to the conclusion that they have illegally granted state aid.
Domstolen37 har endvidere undersøgt forbuddet mod "cold calling" inden for grænseoverskridende tjenesteydelser, der begrænser fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser.
Within the same field, the Court has analyzed37 the prohibition on cold-calling with regard to cross-border services, in its aspect as a restriction on the freedom to provide services.
Domstolen5 har kvalificeret kravet om en filial på det nationale område som "udtryk for en ophævelse af den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser".
The Court5 described the requirement to have a subsidiary on the national territory as constituting "the very negation of the free provision of services".
Domstolene arbejder meget langsomt og har tendens til at afsige milde domme.
Courts often take decisions after long delays and tend to impose low punishments.
Domstolene bør have mulighed for at udsætte en sag, hvis en parallel sag verserer i en anden medlemsstat.
The courts should have the possibility to suspend a case where a parallel case is pending in another Member State.
Domstolene bør også have mulighed for at anvende simple, gennemsigtige og ikke alt for dyre evalueringsmetoder, uden at erstatningsprincippet opgives.
It should also be possible to provide courts with simple, inexpensive and transparent evaluation methods, without abandoning the principle of compensation for damages.