natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Domstolen har af retter i Det Forenede Kongerige, Italien og Nederlandene fået forelagt en række præjudicielle spørgsmål i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 234, som i alt væsentligt vedrører gyldigheden af direktiv 2002/2/EF, særlig artikel 1, nr. 1), litra b), og artikel 1, nr. 4).
References for preliminary rulings under Article 234 of the EC Treaty were brought to the Court of Justice by courts of United Kingdom, Italy and the Netherlands, which centred essentially on the validity of Directive 2002/2/EC, in particular Article 1(1) (b) and 1(4) thereof.
Domstolen har afsagt dom i en sag om en organisations anmodning om aktindsigt i Kommissionens dokumenter vedrørende undersøgelsen af en medlemsstats eventuelle overtrædelse af EU-retten49.
The Court has handed down its judgment in a case that involved a request of an organisation to have access to Commission documents relating to the investigation of a potential infringement of EU law by a Member State.49
Domstolen har afsagt dom vedrørende princippet om forbud mod dobbelt strafforfølgning (ne bis in idem-princippet) i sagerne Gözütok/Brügge.
The Court of Justice has issued his judgment in "ne bis in idem" matters in the cases of Gözütok/Brügge.
Domstolen har afsagt en række vigtige domme på dette område, hvor den har præciseret begrænsningerne i den lovlige anvendelse af regler til bekæmpelse af skatteunddragelse.
The ECJ has handed down a number of important judgments in this area in which it has clarified the limitations on the lawful use of anti-avoidance rules.
Domstolen har afsagt en række vigtige domme, som styrker beskyttelsen af unionsborgerne i forbindelse med artikel 12, 17 og 18, i den forløbne rapporteringsperiode [15].
The Court of Justice gave a number of major judgments strengthening the protection of Union citizens in the context of Articles 12, 17 and 18 during the reporting period.
Domstolen har afsagt kendelse imod de fleste af disse medlemsstater på grund af manglende indberetning.
The Court has ruled against most of these Member States for non-communication.
Domstolen har afvist disse argumenter og f.eks. fastslået, at man ikke kan anvende et krav om bosættelse i forbindelse med en grænsearbejders børn, som derfor har ret til studiestøtte på samme vilkår som dem, der finder anvendelse på børn af statsborgere i den medlemsstat, hvor arbejdstageren er beskæftiget78.
The Court has rejected those arguments and held, for example, that no residence requirement can be applied to the child of a frontier worker, who is therefore entitled to tuition under the same conditions as those applicable to children of nationals of the Member State of employment78.
Domstolen har afvist talrige forsvar fremført af medlemsstaterne som begrundelse for begrænsninger af de grundlæggende friheder.
The Court has rejected numerous defences put forward by Member States to justify restrictions of the fundamental freedoms.
Domstolen har allerede fastlagt en række objektive kriterier for fastsættelsen af restværdien, herunder køretøjets alder, mærke, model, antal tilbagelagte kilometer, fremdriftstype, generelle stand, den mekaniske stand og vedligeholdelsesstand12.
The Court has already identified a number of objective criteria with regard to the determination of the residual value, which include the vehicle's age, make or model, mileage, method of propulsion, general condition, the mechanical state or the state of maintenance of the vehicle12.
Domstolen har allerede flere gange bestemt, at bestemmelser i national lovgivning, som forhindrer, at der tages hensyn til beskæftigelsesperioder i en anden medlemsstats offentlige sektor, udgør uberettiget indirekte forskelsbehandling, f.eks. i relation til adgang til den offentlige sektor120.
The Court has already ruled several times that provisions of national law that prevent previous periods of employment in the public service of other Member States from being taken into account, constitute unjustified indirect discrimination, for example in relation to access to the public sector120.
Domstolen har allerede givet nogle fingerpeg om, hvornår ændringer bør anses for at være afgørende.
The ECJ has already provided some pointers as to when amendments should be considered as material.
Domstolen har allerede klart givet udtryk for, at arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed også gælder for personer, der er arbejdssøgende, samt personer, der gennemfører et praktikophold10.
The Court of Justice has on earlier occasions clearly recognised that the free movement of workers also applies to persons seeking employment and to persons undergoing occupational training as trainees10.
Domstolen har allerede peget på det dobbeltarbejde og den tunge arbejdsgang, som denne kompetencefordeling har resulteret i, og anmodet om, at direkte søgsmål på visse områder udelukkende behandles af Førsteinstansretten.
The Court of Justice has already pointed out the areas of overlap and unwieldy procedures that this division generates and has asked that direct actions in certain fields be dealt with exclusively by the Court of First Instance.
Domstolen har allerede truffet afgørelse om, at traktatens artikel 87 ikke giver Kommissionen mulighed for at isolere støtten som sådan fra den fremgangsmåde, der anvendes i finansieringen, og se bort fra metoden, hvis den i forhold til støtten i snæver forstand gør systemet generelt uforeneligt med fællesmarkedet348.
The ECJ has already held that Article 87 does not allow the Commission to isolate the aid as such from the method by which it is financed and to disregard this method if, in conjunction with the aid in its narrow sense, it renders the whole incompatible with the common market348.
Domstolen har altid fastholdt, at en person skal udøve en aktivitet af økonomisk værdi, som er faktisk og reel, og har udelukket aktiviteter, der har et så ringe omfang, at de fremstår som et rent marginalt supplement24.
The CJ has consistently held that a person must pursue an activity of economic value which is effective and genuine, excluding activities on such a small scale as to be regarded as purely marginal and accessory24.
Domstolen har anerkendt3, at EF-traktatens artikel 95 vedrørende vedtagelse af foranstaltninger med henblik på indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes love og administrative bestemmelser, der vedrører det indre markeds oprettelse og virkemåde, er et passende retsgrundlag for oprettelse af et "fællesskabsorgan, der har til opgave at bidrage til gennemførelsen af en harmoniseringsproces", når der er tæt sammenhæng mellem de opgaver, et sådant organ pålægges, og emnet for de retsakter, der skaber tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes love og administrative bestemmelser.
The Court of Justice has acknowledged3 that Article 95 of the Treaty relating to the adoption of measures for the approximation of legislation for the establishment and functioning of the internal market provides an appropriate legal basis for setting up a "Community body responsible for contributing to the implementation of a process of harmonisation", when the tasks conferred on such a body are closely related to the subject-matter of the acts approximating the national legislations.
Domstolen har anerkendt9, at EF-traktatens artikel 95 vedrørende vedtagelse af foranstaltninger med henblik på indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes love og administrative bestemmelser, der vedrører det indre markeds oprettelse og funktion, er et passende retsgrundlag for oprettelse af et "fællesskabsorgan, der har til opgave at bidrage til gennemførelsen af en harmoniseringsproces", når der er sammenhæng mellem de opgaver, et sådant organ pålægges, og emnet for de retsakter, der skaber tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes love og administrative bestemmelser.
The Court of Justice has acknowledged9 that Article 95 of the EC Treaty relating to the adoption of measures for the approximation of legislation for the establishment and functioning of the internal market provides an appropriate legal basis for setting up a "Community body responsible for contributing to the implementation of a process of harmonisation", when the tasks conferred on such a body are closely linked to the subject-matter of the acts approximating the national legislations.
Domstolen har anført, at hverken sundhedsydelsers særlige karakter eller den måde, hvorpå de organiseres eller finansieres, fritager dem for princippet om fri bevægelighed16.
The European Court of Justice has stated that neither the special nature of health services nor the way in which they are organised or financed removes them from the ambit of the fundamental principle of freedom of movement16.
Domstolen har anlagt en bred fortolkning af begrebet "overførsel" i direktivet af 1977.
The European Court of Justice has given a wide interpretation to the use of the term "transfer" in the 1977 Directive.
Domstolen har bekræftet denne fortolkning bl.a. i Telaustria-dommen24.
The Court of Justice has confirmed this interpretation, notably in its judgment in the Telaustria Case.24
Domstolen har bekræftet denne prioritering 18.
The Court of Justice has confirmed that priority18.
Domstolen har bekræftet denne prioritering12.
The Court of Justice has confirmed that priority12.
Domstolen har bekræftet princippet om, at hensigten med forordningen er at modvirke børnebortførelser mellem medlemsstaterne og i tilfælde af bortførelse at opnå, at tilbagegivelsen af barnet sker uden opsættelse57.
The CJEU has upheld the principle that the Regulation seeks to deter child abduction between Member States and to obtain the child's return without delay once an abduction has taken place57.
Domstolen har bekræftet sin brede fortolkning af forbindelsen med samhandelen, dvs. at det er tilstrækkeligt, at støtte styrker støttemodtagerens konkurrencemæssige situation i forhold til konkurrenterne og dermed fordrejer konkurrencen219.
The Court of Justice confirmed its broad interpretation of the effect on trade: it is sufficient for the aid to strengthen the competitive position of the beneficiary in relation to its competitors and thereby distort competition219.
Domstolen har bekræftet, at en retsafgørelse om anbringelse af et barn skal være blevet erklæret eksigibel i værtsstaten, før den kan fuldbyrdes dér.
The CJEU has confirmed that a placement judgment must be, before it can be enforced in the host Member State, declared enforceable in that Member State.
Domstolen har bekræftet, at formålet med udbudsdirektiverne er at fjerne risikoen for, at der indrømmes indenlandske tilbudsgivere eller ansøgere en fortrinsstilling, når de ordregivende myndigheder indgår kontrakter, og for at et organ, der finansieres eller kontrolleres af staten, lokale myndigheder eller andre offentligretlige organer, lader sig lede af andre hensyn end økonomiske47.
The European Court of Justice has confirmed that the aim of the public procurement directives is to avoid the risk of preference being given to national tenderers or candidates whenever a contract is awarded by contracting authorities, and to avoid the possibility that a body financed or controlled by the State, regional or local authorities or other bodies governed by public law may choose to be guided by considerations that are not economic in nature47.
Domstolen har besluttet at behandle sagen som en hasteprocedure.
The Court has decided to handle the case in an accelerated procedure.
Domstolen har bl.a. fastslået, at når en mine fyldes op med affald, kan der være tale om nyttiggørelse, hvis affaldet bruges i stedet for en primær ressource, som ellers ville være blevet brugt til at fylde minen op med39.
The Court has notably concluded that filling a mine with waste could be a recovery operation if the waste is used in replacement of primary resources that would have otherwise been used for the purpose of filling the mine39.
Domstolen har bl.a. haft lejlighed til at finpudse kriterierne for udvælgelse af områder af fællesskabsbetydning og for anvendelsen af den strenge beskyttelsesordning, som er fastsat i direktivets artikel 12.
In particular, the Court has had the opportunity to refine the criteria for selecting proposed sites of Community importance and for the application of the system of strict protection provided for under Article 12 of the Directive.
Domstolen har da også anerkendt denne forskel ved at statuere, at tjenesteydere må være underlagt lempeligere regler end etablerede virksomheder.
The Court has recognized this difference by imposing a less restrictive and more "lightweight" legal framework for provision of services than for establishment.
Domstolen har derimod ikke haft anledning til at statuere vedrørende underholdspligt i arveforhold.
But the Court felt no need to rule on maintenance obligations in the succession context.
Domstolen har derimod ikke set sig i stand til at fastsætte størrelsen af den erstatning, der tilkommer den enkelte sagsøger.
However, the Court has said that it cannot determine the amount of compensation due to each applicant.
Domstolen har desuden behandlet flere sager om EF-traktatens artikel 28 og har gentagne gange grebet ind, når medlemsstaterne har fastsat krav til de tekniske specifikationer for og forhåndsgodkendelsen af produkter.
Moreover, when called on to give a ruling on Article 28 EC, the Court of Justice has several times come out against the requirements set by Member States concerning technical specifications and prior approval of products.
Domstolen har desuden i flere gange fundet, at direktivets krav med hensyn til maksimal arbejdstid, årlig betalt ferie og minimumshvileperioder "udgør regler af en særlig betydning inden for Unionens sociallovgivning, der gælder som et mindstekrav for enhver arbejdstager"21.
The Court of Justice, moreover, has repeatedly held that the Directive’s requirements on maximum working time, paid annual leave and minimum rest periods ‘constitute rules of Community social law of particular importance, from which every worker must benefit’21.
Domstolen har desuden udtrykkelig bekræftet, at det er helt legitimt, at skattemæssige overvejelser spiller en rolle, når det skal afgøres, hvor et datterselskab skal etableres8.
The ECJ has also expressly confirmed that it is quite legitimate for tax considerations to play a role in the decision on where to establish a subsidiary8.
Domstolen har desuden understreget, at traktaten ikke indeholder noget ”forbud mod, at en virksomhed gør brug af retten til fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser i tilfælde, hvor den ikke udbyder tjenesteydelser i den medlemsstat, hvor den er etableret”21.
The Court of Justice has also emphasised that ‘the Treaty does not prohibit an undertaking from exercising the freedom to provide services if it does not offer services in the Member State in which it is established’21.
Domstolen har dog bestemt, at pensionerede arbejdstagere kan kræve sociale fordele fra den stat, de tidligere har været beskæftiget i, såsom særlig udtrædelsesgodtgørelse, hvis den pågældende mister sit arbejde107, så længe denne godtgørelse er relateret til den foregående beskæftigelse.
However, the Court has ruled that retired workers may claim social advantages from the State where they previously worked, such as special compensation payments for losing a job107, as long as these relate to their previous employment.
Domstolen har dog endnu ikke haft mulighed for at bedømme dette aspekt af oprettelsesforordningerne.
However, the Court of Justice did not yet have opportunity to judge this particular aspect of the ESAs Regulations.
Domstolen har dog for nylig16 fastslået, at ” intet i EF-traktatens artikel 141, stk. 1 peger i retning af, at bestemmelsens anvendelsesområde skulle være begrænset til de situationer, hvor mænd og kvinder udfører deres arbejde for samme arbejdsgiver”.
More recently16, however, the Court has specified that "there is, in this connection, nothing in the wording of Article 141(1) EC to suggest that the applicability of that provision is limited to situations in which men and women work for the same employer".
Domstolen har dog fundet, at nye rettigheder, som ikke er relateret til den foregående beskæftigelse, f.eks. børnepasningsydelse, ikke skal ydes af den medlemsstat, hvor grænsearbejdere tidligere var beskæftiget 108.
However, the Court has held that new rights which are unrelated to the previous experience, such as child raising allowance, do not have to be granted by the Member State where the frontier worker was previously employed108.
Domstolen har dog i samme dom præciseret, at de kompetente myndigheder i værtsmedlemsstaten, inden en tjenesteyder pålægges dette krav, skal undersøge, om den sociale beskyttelse af arbejdstagerne ikke i tilstrækkelig grad tilgodeses ved, at der inden for en rimelig frist fremlægges dokumenter, der føres i etableringsmedlemsstaten13.
However, in the same judgment, the Court explained that, before imposing an obligation of this kind on a service provider, the competent authorities in the host country would have to verify that the social protection of the workers concerned was not sufficiently safeguarded by the production, within a reasonable time, of the documents kept in the Member State of establishment13.
Domstolen har dog i sin dom af 5. september 2012 fastlagt, hvad der må betragtes som den materielle grænse for delegerede beføjelser, nemlig spørgsmål vedrørende grundlæggende personlige rettigheder.
In its judgment of 5 September 2012, the Court of Justice did, however, lay down what can be deemed to be substantive limits to the power of delegation – matters relating to people's fundamental rights.
Domstolen har dog klart fastslået10, at adgangen til at anlægge retssager er en logisk konsekvens af de grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder på området uden indre grænser.
Yet the Court of  Justice has clearly10 established that access to justice is a corollary of the freedoms of the area without internal frontiers.
Domstolen har dog senere fastslået, at Fællesskabets konkurrenceregler fuldt ud finder anvendelse på transportsektoren1.
However, the Court of Justice has since held that the Community competition rules apply in full to the transport sector1.
Domstolen har dog sjældent gjort brug af denne mulighed for at fastsætte en dato efter domsafsigelsen12; den har under ingen omstændigheder gjort det i sager om manglende meddelelse af gennemførelsesforanstaltninger for direktiver.
The Court rarely made use of it to set a date subsequent to the date of its judgment12; in any case, it never did so in cases concerning failure to notify measures to transpose directives.
Domstolen har dog suspenderet virkningerne af annulleringen, indtil Rådet inden for en rimelig frist har udstedt nye forordninger om det samme emne.
However, the Court suspended the effects of the repeal to enable the Council to adopt two new Regulations with the same purpose within a reasonable time.
Domstolen har endnu ikke haft lejlighed til at udtale sig specifikt om kravet om, at tjenesteyderen skal indgive en erklæring med henblik på udstationering.
At this stage, the Court has not delivered any judgments relating specifically to the admissibility of an obligation to make a declaration concerning the posting of workers.
Domstolen har endnu ikke ophævet en foranstaltning på grund af manglende overholdelse af nærhedsprincippet.
So far, the Court has not annulled a measure for breach of the subsidiarity principle.
Domstolen har endnu ikke ophævet en foranstaltning på grund af manglende overholdelse af nærhedsprincippet.
The Court has yet to annul a measure for breach of subsidiarity.
Domstolen har endvidere givet fortolkninger af nogle af projektkategorierne og af, hvad 'tilladelse' betyder, og har også behandlet spørgsmålet om tilladelser, der gives for allerede gennemførte projekter.
The ECJ has also provided interpretations of some of the project categories and the concept of "development consent", and has dealt with the issue of retention permissions.
Domstolen har endvidere gjort gældende, at menneskers liv og sundhed står øverst blandt de goder og interesser, som er beskyttet ved traktaten, og at det tilkommer medlemsstaterne at træffe bestemmelse om det niveau for beskyttelse af den offentlige sundhed, som de ønsker at sikre, og hvorledes dette niveau skal nås.
The Court of Justice has also held that health and life of humans rank foremost among the assets and interests protected by the Treaty and that it is for Member States to determine the level of protection which they wish to afford to public health and the way in which that level has to be achieved.
Domstolen har enekompetence med hensyn til følgende:
The Court of Justice shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the following:
Domstolen har f.eks. afgjort, at retten til at kræve, at retssager finder sted på et bestemt sprog,76 og muligheden for en vandrende arbejdstager til at få tilladelse til, at vedkommendes ugifte partner kan bosætte sig med vedkommende77, skal betragtes som faldende ind under konceptet vedrørende sociale fordele, jf. artikel 7, stk. 2, i forordningen.
The CJ has decided, for example, that the right to require that legal proceedings take place in a specific language76 and the possibility for a migrant worker to obtain permission for his unmarried partner to reside with him77 must be regarded as falling within the concept of social advantage under Article 7(2) of the Regulation.
Domstolen har faktisk allerede udtalt at Fællesskabet kan indgå aftaler med tredjelande om alle de forhold, der er defineret af traktaten.
The Court of Justice has already stated indeed that “the Community enjoys the capacity to establish contractual links with third countries over the whole field of objectives defined by the Treaty.
Domstolen har fastsat, at begrænsninger for den fri levering af denne tjeneste kan være berettiget26.
The Court of Justice has held that restrictions to the free provision of this service may be justified26.
Domstolen har fastsat, at en medlemsstat ikke må tvinge disse vandrende arbejdstagere til at deltage i en sådan udvælgelsesprøve, men at man i stedet må fastlægge andre metoder til rekrutteringen.
The CJ decided that a Member State may not oblige those migrant workers to pass such a competition, but must provide for different methods of recruitment instead.
Domstolen har fastsat, at forvaltningsselskaber ikke må deltage i en samordnet praksis, der indebærer, at udenlandske brugere systematisk nægtes direkte adgang til deres repertoirer, medmindre det praktisk ikke er muligt at opbygge en kontrolordning på det andet lands område20.
The Court made it clear that collecting societies may not engage in a concerted action having the effect of systematically refusing to grant direct access to their repertoires by users located in foreign territories, a possible justification for such a refusal being the impracticability of setting up a monitoring system in the foreign territory20.
Domstolen har fastslået, at "foranstaltninger, som er uforenelige med overholdelsen af de ved konventionen anerkendte og sikrede menneskerettigheder, ikke er tilladte i Fællesskabet", og at enhver begrundelse for bestemmelser, der kan begrænse den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser, som er hjemlet i fællesskabsretten, skal fortolkes i lyset af de almindelige retsgrundsætninger, herunder de grundlæggende rettigheder.
The Court has therefore specified that “the Community cannot accept measures which are incompatible with observance of the human rights” and that any justification, provided for by Community law, for rules which are likely to obstruct the exercise of the freedom to provide services, must be interpreted in the light of the general principles of law and in particular of fundamental rights.
Domstolen har fastslået, at "intet i artikel 141, stk. 1, EF peger i retning af, at bestemmelsens anvendelsesområde skulle være begrænset til de situationer, hvor mænd og kvinder udfører deres arbejde for samme arbejdsgiver".
The Court has specified that "there is, in this context nothing in the wording of Article 141(1) EC to suggest that the applicability of that provision is limited to situations in which men and women work for the same employer".