natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EF-Domstolen anså denne praksis for at være en hindring af den fri bevægelighed for personer og opfordrede institutionerne til at vedtage den nødvendige lovgivning på området3.
The European Court of Justice, however, deemed this practice to be an obstacle to the free movement of persons and urged the institutions to adopt the necessary legislation in that field3.
EF-Domstolen anvendte kriterierne fra ovennævnte Streekgewest/Pape-sager.
The ECJ applied the criteria set out in the Streekgewest and Pape cases discussed above.
EF-Domstolen bekræftede i sin dom12 om det europæiske andelsselskab, at artikel 352 var det korrekte retsgrundlag.
The European Court of Justice confirmed in its judgment12 on the European Cooperative Society that Article 352 was the correct legal basis.
EF-domstolen bekræftede i sin udtalelse 1/03 af 7. februar 2006 om indgåelsen af den nye Lugano-konvention, at Fællesskabet har erhvervet ekstern enekompetence til at forhandle og indgå internationale aftaler med tredjelande om en række vigtige spørgsmål, der er omhandlet i EF-traktatens Afsnit IV.
The ECJ confirmed in its Opinion 1/03 of 7 February 2006 relating to the conclusion of the new Lugano Convention, that the Community has acquired exclusive external competence to negotiate and conclude international agreements with third countries on a number of important subject matters referred to in Title IV of the EC Treaty.
EF-Domstolen bekræfter ligeledes, at de omhandlede virksomheder naturligvis har ret til et rimeligt overskud.
The Court also confirms that the undertakings in question are, of course, entitled to a reasonable profit.
EF-domstolen er blevet bedt om at udtale sig om flere enkeltsager af denne art. I mangel på EU-lovgivning på området udgør EF-domstolens domme en vigtig juridisk rettesnor for Kommissionen.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ), called on to decide on various individual cases, has returned judgments which, in the absence of Community legislation on the matter, provide useful case law as a guide.
EF-Domstolen er ved flere lejligheder blevet anmodet om at tage stilling til spørgsmål om vilkårene for arbejdstagere, der arbejder i udlandet som led i den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser i medfør af EF-traktatens artikel 49.
As regards posted workers within the context of the EC Treaty, the Court of Justice has been requested on several occasions to clarify their situation in the context of the freedom to supply services as referred to in Article 49 of the Treaty.
EF-Domstolen fastholdt, at målet om at forbedre ældre arbejdstageres adgang til arbejdsmarkedet var berettiget, men midlet var i strid med proportionalitetsprincippet, da det blev anset for at være for vidtgående, og da målet kunne være nået på en mindre diskriminerende måde.
The European Court of Justice held that the aim of increasing the employability of older workers was legitimate, but the measure did not respect the principle of proportionality, as it was deemed to be too wide in scope and the aim could have been achieved in a less discriminatory way.
EF-domstolen fastslog i de Lasteyrie og i N, at den mulige henstand med betalingen, som f.eks. sker på betingelse af, at der stilles sikkerhed, har en restriktiv virkning på den måde, at den skattepligtige fratages råderetten over de formuegoder, der er givet som sikkerhed.
The ECJ ruled in de Lasteyrie and in N that the possible suspension of payment made subject, for example, to conditions that guarantees must be provided, constitutes a restrictive effect in that the taxpayer is deprived of enjoyment of the assets given as a guarantee.
EF-Domstolen fastslog i en dom fra 1990, at børn af indvandrede arbejdstagere, som vælger at studere i en medlemsstat uden for værtslandet, har ret til samme ydelser, som de ville have haft ret til i værtslandet29.
The European Court of Justice, in its 1990 ruling stated that the children of migrant workers, if they decide to study in a Member State different from their host country, are entitled to the same benefits they would enjoy in their host country29.
EF-Domstolen fastslog, at Bremen overtræder direktivet med sin bestemmelse om, at man i dele af den offentlige sektor, hvor kvinderne er underrepræsenterede, i forbindelse med ansættelse eller forfremmelse automatisk skal foretrække en kvindelig ansøger, hvis hun har samme kvalifikationer som mandlige ansøgere.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities decided that the legal provision of Bremen was in breach of the EEC Directive by stating that, where male and female applicants had the same qualifications, preference should automatically be given to the recruitment and promotion of women in public-service sectors where women were under-represented.
EF-Domstolen fastslog, at eftersom EU-retten ikke fastsætter generelle kriterier for fordelingen af medlemsstaternes kompetence vedrørende ophævelsen af dobbeltbeskatning inden for Fællesskabet, er medlemsstaterne ikke forpligtet til at hindre den heraf følgende juridiske dobbeltbeskatning.17
The ECJ ruled that, in so far as EU law does not lay down any general criteria for the attribution of areas of competence between the MS in relation to the elimination of double taxation within the Community, MS are not obliged to prevent the resulting juridical double taxation.17
EF-Domstolen fastslog, at selv om det er medlemsstaterne, der har kompetencen for så vidt angår undervisningsindholdet og opbygningen af deres respektive uddannelsessystemer, skal medlemsstaterne ikke desto mindre udøve denne kompetence under overholdelse af fællesskabsretten og herunder specielt EF-traktatens bestemmelser i artikel 18 om borgernes ret til frit at færdes og opholde sig på medlemsstaternes område.
The European Court of Justice stated that although the Member States are competent to determine the content of teaching and the organisation of their respective education systems, that competence must be exercised in compliance with Community law and, in particular, in compliance with freedom of movement for citizens of the Union, as conferred by article 18 EC.
EF-Domstolen fastslog38, at direktivets artikel 5, fortolket i lyset af EF-traktatens artikel 49, i princippet ikke er til hinder for anvendelsen af en ordning med solidarisk hæftelse for hovedkontrahenter som passende foranstaltning i tilfælde af manglende overholdelse af direktivet.
The ECJ held38 that Article 5 of the Directive, interpreted in the light of Article 49 EC, did in principle not preclude the use of a system of joint and several liability for general or principal contractors as an appropriate measure in the event of failure to comply with the Directive.
EF-domstolen godkender imidlertid kun sådanne begrænsninger, når det er sikkert, at de tilstræbte mål ikke kan nås ved at anvende en mindre restriktiv foranstaltning (proportionalitetsprincippet).
However, the ECJ accepts such a restriction only where it is certain that the aims sought cannot be achieved using a less restrictive measure (principle of proportionality).
EF-Domstolen gør opmærksom herpå i sin berømte kendelse af 22. maj 198527.
The Court of Justice drove home the same point in its well-known judgement of 22 May 198527.
EF-Domstolen gør opmærksom herpå i sin berømte kendelse af 22. maj 198529.
The Court of Justice drove home the same point in its well-known judgement of 22 May 198529.
EF-Domstolen har afsagt en række vigtige domme om rækkevidden af traktatens artikel 296, som omhandler undtagelser, der er begrundet i medlemsstaternes væsentlige sikkerhedsinteresser.
The European Court of Justice has produced some important rulings on the scope of Article 296 of the Treaty which covers exceptions for essential security interests in Member States.
EF-domstolen har afsagt en række vigtige domme, hvor den har præciseret begrænsningerne i den lovlige anvendelse af regler til bekæmpelse af skatteunddragelse.
The ECJ has handed down a number of important judgments in which it has clarified the limitations on the lawful use of anti-avoidance rules.
EF-Domstolen har afsagt vigtige domme, der tydeliggør nogle af VVM-bestemmelserne
the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has delivered important rulings clarifying some of the EIA provisions;
EF-Domstolen har allerede afgjort, at visse nationale bestemmelser om information om lægemidler er i modstrid med artikel 28 i traktaten (sag C-143/06, Juers Pharma).
The European Court of Justice has already found certain national provisions on information on medicinal products to be contrary to Article 28 of the Treaty (case C-143/06, Juers-Pharma).
EF-Domstolen har allerede behandlet en række spørgsmål vedrørende grænseoverskridende sundhedsydelser, navnlig godtgørelse af sundhedsydelser leveret i en anden medlemsstat end den, i hvilken modtageren af sundhedsydelserne er bosat.
Some issues related to cross-border healthcare, in particular reimbursement of healthcare provided in a Member State other than that in which the recipient of the care is resident, have been already addressed by the Court of Justice.
EF-Domstolen har allerede truffet flere afgørelser om dette emne7.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has already given a series of rulings on the subject7.
EF-Domstolen har altid ydet et vigtigt bidrag til effektivt at reducere forskelsbehandlingen af kvinder i beskæftigelsessammenhæng.
The European Court of Justice has always played an important role in contributing to diminish effectively discrimination of women in employment.
EF-domstolen har anerkendt substitution mellem gærede drikkevarer (sagerne C-170/78 – Kommissionen mod Det Forenede Kongerige og C-166/98 – Socridis).
The Court of Justice has recognised (cases C-170/78 – Commission vs. United Kingdom, and C-166/98 - Socridis) that one alcoholic beverage may stand in for another.
EF-Domstolen har desuden fastslået, at når betingelserne for anvendelse af EF-traktatens artikel 95 som hjemmel er opfyldt, kan fællesskabslovgiver ikke forhindres i at anvende denne hjemmel, selv om beskyttelsen af folkesundheden er afgørende for lovgivers valg4.
The Court of Justice has also held that, where the conditions for recourse to Article 95 EC as a legal basis are fulfilled, the Community legislature cannot be prevented from relying on that legal basis on the ground that public health protection is a decisive factor in the choices to be made4.
EF-Domstolen har desuden for nylig (sag C-221/00) fortolket det eksisterende direktiv således, at alle sundhedsanprisninger vedrørende sygdomme hos mennesker er forbudt.
Furthermore, the recent Court judgement (ECJ case C-221/00) interpreted the existing Directive as banning all health claims relating to human diseases.
EF-Domstolen har endvidere bekræftet, at foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af fangstpladser, bevarelse og afbalanceret udnyttelse af ressourcerne og begrænsningen af fiskeriindsatsen i vid udstrækning kan omfatte miljøaspekter.6 De juridiske rammer for den fælles fiskeripolitik giver derfor plads til en generel integration af miljøhensyn inden for fiskerisektoren, således som der opfordres til i de relevante bestemmelser i EF-traktaten, ændret ved Amsterdam-traktaten (artikel 6) og i den såkaldte Cardiff-proces.
Moreover, the European Court of Justice has confirmed that measures designed for ensuring the protection of fishing grounds, the conservation and balanced exploitation of resources and the limitation of fishing effort can integrate environmental components to a large extent.6 The legal framework of the CFP can therefore support a broad integration of environmental concerns in the fisheries sector as called for in relevant provisions of the EC Treaty as amended by the Amsterdam Treaty (Article 6) and in the so called Cardiff process.
EF-Domstolen har endvidere fastslået, at "de ægteskabelige bånd ikke kan anses for brudt, så længe ægteskabet ikke er blevet opløst ved en afgørelse fra den dertil kompetente myndighed.
The Court of Justice has upheld that “the marital relationship cannot be regarded as dissolved so long as it has not been terminated by the competent authority.
EF-Domstolen har erklæret, at en effektiv beskyttelse af de traktatfæstede rettigheder kræver, at personer, der har lidt en skade som følge af en overtrædelse af artikel 81 og 82, skal have ret til at kræve erstatning2.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ) has ruled that effective protection of the rights granted by the Treaty requires that individuals who have suffered a loss arising from an infringement of Articles 81 or 82 have the right to claim damages.2
EF-Domstolen har f.eks. fastslået, at et organ, der kontrollerer og fører tilsyn med luftrummet og opkræver afgifter for anvendelsen af dets luftnavigationssystem10, eller et privatretligt organ, der fører forureningstilsyn i en havn11, udøver beføjelser, der typisk henhører under en offentlig myndighed og ikke er af økonomisk karakter.
The European Court of Justice has held, for example, that an organism controlling and supervising the air space and collecting charges for the use of its air navigation system10, or a private law body carrying out anti-pollution surveillance in a sea port11, exercise powers which are typically those of a public authority and which are not of an economic nature.
EF-domstolen har fastsat, at en medlemsstat i princippet har ret til at træffe foranstaltninger for klart og nøjagtigt at fastslå de omkostninger, der kan fradrages som forskningsudgifter (Baxter8, Fournier).
The ECJ has held that, in principle, a Member State has the right to apply measures to ascertain clearly and precisely the amount of costs deductible as research expenditure (Baxter8, Fournier).
EF-domstolen har fastslået, at bøden kan beregnes på grundlag af deltagernes omsætning.
The Court of Justice has found that the fine can be calculated on the basis of the turnover of the members of the association.
EF-Domstolen har fastslået, at traktatens bestemmelser om fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser omfatter frihed for modtagerne af sundhedsydelser, herunder personer, der har behov for lægebehandling, til at rejse til en anden medlemsstat for at modtage ydelserne der.
The Court of Justice has held that the Treaty provisions on the freedom to provide services includes the freedom for the recipients of healthcare, including persons in need of medical treatment, to go to another Member Sate in order to receive it there.
EF-Domstolen har fastslået13, at sådanne data bør leveres på et omkostningsbaseret grundlag.
The ECJ has held13 that such data should be provided on a cost-oriented basis.
EF-Domstolen har flere gange anerkendt dette valg af retsgrundlag34 under de omstændigheder, der gør sig gældende for patenterbarhed, især i forbindelse med det nævnte direktiv 98/44/EF i en nylig domstolsafgørelse35, hvor retsgrundlaget var genstand for en grundig gennemgang.
This choice of legal basis has been recognised under the circumstances which are present with regard to patentability by the Court of Justice on a number of occasions34 and especially with regard to the mentioned Directive 98/44/EC in a recent ruling of the Court of Justice35 where the legal basis was examined thoroughly.
EF-Domstolen har for nylig afsagt en dom, ifølge hvilken det står medlemsstaterne frit for at favorisere virksomheder inden for denne sektor i forhold til kommercielle virksomheder9.
A ruling recently handed down by the European Court of Justice states that every Member State is free to promote activities in this sector, rather than in profit-making companies9.
EF-Domstolen har for nylig defineret rækkevidden af notificeringsundtagelsen i henhold til direktivets artikel 10, nr. 1, første led, i sin dom i Canal Satellite Digital21-sagen.
In its recent Canal Satellite Digital judgement21, the Court of Justice explicitly defined the scope of the exception to the notification obligation, provided for under the first indent of Article 10(1) of the Directive.
EF-Domstolen har for nylig fastslået, at denne form for sekundær mærkning ikke er påkrævet (Béarnaise-sagen, C - 51/94).
Indeed the ECJ has recently ruled that this type of second declaration is unnecessary (Béarnaise case, C - 51/94).
EF-Domstolen har for nylig i sag C-221/00, Østrig mod Kommissionen, fortolket det eksisterende mærkningsdirektiv således, at alle sundhedsanprisninger vedrørende sygdomme hos mennesker er forbudt.
Very recently, in case C-221/00, Austria v Commission, the European Court of Justice interpreted the existing labelling Directive as banning all health claims relating to human diseases.
EF-Domstolen har for nylig slået fast, at mænd og kvinder bør have denne mulighed på lige fod under offentlige ordninger.
As recently stated by the European Court of Justice, this option should be allowed on an equal basis for men and women in public sector schemes.
EF-Domstolen har fortolket denne bestemmelse som følger: for at blive ansvarsfri skal producenten af et defekt produkt bevise, at det på grundlag af den objektive videnskabelige og tekniske viden på det mest avancerede niveau på det tidspunkt, da han bragte produktet i omsætning, ikke var muligt at opdage defekten.
The European Court of Justice interpreted the relevant provision in the following way: the producer of a defective product is absolved of liability if he can establish that the objective state of technical and scientific knowledge, at its most advanced level, at the time when he put the product into circulation was not such as to enable the existence of the defect to be discovered.
EF-Domstolen har fortolket fællesskabsreglerne anderledes end de nationale regeringer.
The European Court of Justice has interpreted Community rules in a different way compared to interpretation by national governments.
EF-Domstolen har fremhævet, at VVM-direktivet har et vidtrækkende anvendelsesområde og formål18 og tilsigter at tilse, at medlemsstaternes skønsmæssige beføjelser ikke underminerer direktivets målsætning, der er, at intet projekt, der er af en sådan beskaffenhed, at det vil kunne påvirke miljøet væsentligt i direktivets betydning, undtages fra en vurdering, medmindre det specifikke udelukkede projekt på basis en omfattende screening kan anses for ikke at kunne påvirke miljøet væsentligt.
The ECJ has emphasised that the EIA Directive is broad in both scope and purpose18 and seeks to ensure that MS' discretion does not undermine the objective of the Directive, which is that no project likely to have significant effects on the environment, within the meaning of the directive, should be exempt from assessment, unless the specific project excluded could, on the basis of a comprehensive screening, be regarded as not likely to have such effects.
EF-domstolen har gentagne gange bekræftet, at bekæmpelse af alkoholrelaterede skader er en vigtig og relevant målsætning i folkesundhedsmæssig henseende3.
The European Court of Justice has repeatedly confirmed that combating alcohol-related harm is an important and valid public health goal3.
EF-Domstolen har gentagne gange slået fast, at "det fremgår af artikel 10 EF, at medlemsstaterne er forpligtet til at medvirke loyalt til enhver undersøgelse, der iværksættes af Kommissionen i henhold til artikel 226 EF, og at meddele den alle de oplysninger, som den anmoder om i denne forbindelse".17 Dette vedrører alle undersøgelser, der udføres af Kommissionen som traktaternes vogter, herunder eventuelle kontroller af, om traktatens artikel 296 kan anvendes på forsvarskontrakter.
The Court of Justice has repeatedly stated that "Article 10 EC makes it clear that the Member States are required to cooperate in good faith with the enquiries of the Commission pursuant to Article 226 EC, and to provide the Commission with all the information requested for that purpose".17 This concerns all investigations carried out by the Commission as guardian of the Treaty, including possible verifications of the applicability of Article 296 TEC to defence contracts.
EF-Domstolen har gentagne gange understreget, at denne kontrol skal gøre det muligt i overensstemmelse med proportionalitetsprincippet at nå de fastsatte målsætninger uden at begrænse denne frihed mere end højst nødvendigt13.
The ECJ has underlined several times that these inspections must be suitable for achieving the objectives pursued without restricting this freedom any more than necessary13, in accordance with the principle of proportionality.
EF-Domstolen har i den forbindelse slået fast, at skatter, rettigheder og afgifter, der besidder momsens grundlæggende egenskaber – også selv om de ikke er identiske med moms i alle henseender16 - under alle omstændigheder skal anses for at påvirke omsætningen af varer og tjenesteydelser på samme måde som moms.
The Court has ruled in this connection that in all circumstances taxes and duties with the essential characteristics of VAT, even if not identical to it in every respect, must be considered to affect the circulation of goods and services16.
EF-Domstolen har i et tidligere tilfælde undersøgt disse særrettigheder og bekræftet, at de er i overensstemmelse med artikel 95 i EØF-traktaten.
The European Court of Justice has already examined these special rights in one case and found them to be compatible with Article 95 of the EEC Treaty.
EF-Domstolen har i flere domme fastslået, at patienter i deres egenskab af forsikrede har ret til gennem den lovpligtige socialsikringsordning at få godtgjort udgifter til sundhedsydelser afholdt i en anden medlemsstat.
The right to reimbursement of the costs of healthcare provided in another Member State from the statutory social security scheme of patients as insured persons was recognised by the Court of Justice in several judgements.
EF-Domstolen har i forbindelse med en præjudiciel afgørelse10 om et sådant anlæg i et hotel klart fastslået, at dette spørgsmål ikke er reguleret i direktiv 93/83/EØF, og at det derfor må afgøres på grundlag af national ret.
When asked to give a preliminary ruling10 concerning such an installation in a hotel, the Court of Justice clearly took the view that this question did not fall within the scope of Directive 93/83/EEC and that the case had to be decided on the basis of national law.
EF-domstolen har i princippet anerkendt, at begrænsninger af skatteinitiativers omfang under visse omstændigheder enten kan begrundes i en undtagelse, der udtrykkelig er fastsat i traktaten7, eller i andre forhold, som EF-domstolen anerkender som tvingende almene hensyn.
In principle, the ECJ has recognised that restrictions on the scope of tax incentives could, under certain specific circumstances, be justified, either by an exemption expressly provided for by the Treaty7 or on other grounds recognised by the ECJ as overriding requirements in the general interest.
EF-domstolen har i princippet anerkendt, at forebyggelse af skatteundgåelse kan retfærdiggøre begrænsninger af de grundlæggende friheder.
The ECJ has, in principle, recognised that the prevention of tax avoidance could justify restriction of the fundamental freedoms.
EF-Domstolen har i sine domme anvendt begrebet "den gennemsnitlige forbruger", som er en "almindeligt oplyst, rimeligt opmærksom og velunderrettet forbruger".
The European Court of Justice has used the concept of the ‘average consumer’ who is ‘reasonably well informed, observant and circumspect’ in its judgements.
EF-domstolen har i øvrigt udtalt, at virksomheder og privatpersoner kan bruge en manglende forudgående anmeldelse som begrundelse for ikke at anvende en national teknisk forskrift.
The European Court of Justice also considered that enterprises and individuals can use an absence of prior notification as a justification for not applying a new national technical rule.
EF-Domstolen har imidlertid fastslået, at det er vigtigt, at disse bliver respekteret2.
However, the ECJ had held that it was important that these be respected2.
EF-domstolen har imidlertid hidtil meget klart sagt, at budgetmæssige argumenter ikke kan accepteres som sådan12.
However, the ECJ has so far been very clear that budgetary arguments are not acceptable as such 12.
EF-domstolen har imidlertid så vidt konkluderet (Baxter, Futura og Singer og Fournier), at begrænsningerne i disse særlige tilfælde ikke står i et rimeligt forhold til de tilstræbte mål.
However, the ECJ has so far concluded (Baxter, Futura and Singer and Fournier) that the restrictions in these specific cases are not proportionate to the aims sought.