natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med et stort flertal af stemmer for og 2 stemmer hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by a large majority with two abstentions and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med et stort flertal af stemmer for og 3 hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 43, stk. 3 (E), og artikel 49, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by a large majority with three abstentions and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 43(E) and 49(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med et stort flertal af stemmer for og ingen imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by a large majority and no votes against, and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med et stort flertal af stemmer for og uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 43, stk. 3 (E), og artikel 49, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by a large majority and with no dissenting votes, and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 43(E) and 49(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med et stort flertal af stemmer for, 1 imod og ingen hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 43 E, og artikel 49, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by a large majority, one abstention and with no dissenting votes, and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 43(E) and 49(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med et stort flertal stemmer for og 1 stemme hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by a large majority with one abstention and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3), third paragraph).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med flertal og 1 stemme hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 43, stk. 3 (E), og artikel 49, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by a majority, with no dissenting votes and one abstention and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 43(E) and 49(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med færre end 5 stemmer imod den 27. juni 2012, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with less than five votes against on 27 June 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med færre end 5 stemmer imod den 28. juni 2012, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion on 28 June 2012 with fewer than five votes against and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med færre end 5 stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with fewer than five votes against and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med kun 1 stemme imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with only 1 vote against and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end 5 stemmer imod den 26. februar 2013, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with less than five votes against on 26 February 2013 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end 5 stemmer imod den 4. april 2013, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with fewer than five votes against on 4 April 2013 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end 5 stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with fewer than 5 votes against and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end 5 stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the Section had adopted its opinion with less than 5 votes against and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end 5 stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
Since the section had adopted its opinion with less than 5 votes against and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end 5 stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with fewer than 5 votes against and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end fem stemmer imod den 29. april 2013, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with fewer than five votes against on 29 April 2013 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med stort flertal af stemmer for og 1 stemme hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt ikke at indlede en generel debat, men at gå direkte over til afstemningen (forretningsordenens artikel 43, litra E, og artikel 49, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by a large majority with one abstention and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 43(E) and 49(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med stort flertal for og 1 stemme hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt ikke at indlede en general debat, men at gå direkte over til afstemningen (forretningsordenens artikel 43, litra E, og artikel 49, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by a large majority with one abstention and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 43(E) and 49(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden nogen stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 43 (E), og artikel 49, stk. 3).
As the Section had adopted its opinion with no dissenting votes and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 43(E) and 49(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod (7 hverken for eller imod), og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 43 E og 49, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by a majority vote, with 7 abstentions, and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 43(e) and 49(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 1. februar 2010, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 1 February 2010 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 1. juni 2010, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the Section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 1 June 2010 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 1. juni 2010, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 1 June 2010 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 1. september 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 1 September 2009 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 1. september 2010, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 1 September 2010 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 10. november 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 10 November 2009 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 11. april 2012, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 11 April 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 11. juli 2006, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 11 July 2006 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 11. marts 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion nem con and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 11. september 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 11 September 2009, and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 12. juli 2006, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 12 July 2006 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 12. november 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4 og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 12 November 2009 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 12. november 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 12 November 2009 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 12. november 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 12 November 2009 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 13. juli 2006, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion without any votes against on 13 July 2006 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3) of the Rules of Procedure).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 13. oktober 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
Since the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 13 October 2009 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 14. marts 2012, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 14 March 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 15. april 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 15 April 2009 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 15. december 2010, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
Since the section had adopted its opinion on 15 December 2010 with no votes against and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 15. februar 2000, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 43, stk. 3 (E), og artikel 49, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion without any votes against on 15 February 2000 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 43(E) and 49(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 15. juli 2008, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion unanimously on 15 July 2008 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 15. juni 2010, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 15 June 2010 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 15. juni 2010, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 15 June 2010, and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 15. oktober 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on  15 October 2009 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod den 15. oktober 2009, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 15 October 2009 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).