natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
David Doninotti repræsenterede Claudio Rotti i henhold til artikel 18
David Doninotti represented Claudio Rotti under Rule 18
David Doninotti repræsenterede Claudio Rotti i henhold til artikel 18
Doninotti, David represented Rotti, Claudio under Rule 18.
David Doninotti repræsenterede Claudio Rotti i henhold til artikel 18.
David Doninotti represented Claudio Rotti under Rule 18
David Doninotti repræsenterede Claudio Rotti iht. art. 18.
David Doninotti represented Claudio Rotti under Rule 18.
David Doninotti repræsenterede Claudio Rotti iht. art. 18.
Doninotti David represented Rotti Claudio under Rule 18.
David Evans
Evans
David Evans
Mr Evans
David Evans (EN) (for Gruppe I)
Mr David Evans (for Group I)
David Evans (for Gruppe I)
Mr David Evans (for Group I)
David Evans (Gr.
Mr David Evans (Gr.
David Evans (UK - I)
Mr Evans (UK-I)
David Evans (UK-I)
Mr Evans
David Evans (UK-I)
Mr Evans (UK - I)
David Evans (UK-I)
Mr Evans (UK-I)
David Evans fremhævede husdyravlernes problemer og konsekvenserne for eksporten.
Mr Evans pointed to the problems faced by farmers and to the implications for exporters.
David Evans nævnte behovet for at undersøge denne markedsforanstaltning inden for rammerne af midtvejsrevisionen af den fælles landbrugspolitik.
Mr Evans mentioned the need to re-examine this market measure within the framework of the mid-term review of the CAP.
David Evans spurgte, hvorledes Fødevaremyndigheden vil opretholde sin troværdighed over for offentligheden, hvilket samarbejde, der planlægges med de respektive nationale organer, og hvordan tidsplanen er for Fødevaremyndighedens oprettelse.
Mr Evans asked how the EFA would maintain its credibility towards the general public, what level of interaction was foreseen with the respective national bodies and what was the timetable linked to EFA's creation.
David Evans ville gerne have en diskussion om de problemer, som franske pensionerede landbrugere står over for.
Mrs Evans hoped to be able to hold a debate on the fundamental problems facing retired French farmers.
David Feickert
FEICKERT David
David Feickert (F) (for Gruppe II)
Mr David Feickert (F) (for Group II)
David FEICKERT (for Gruppe II)
Mr D. David FEICKERT (for Group II)
David FEICKERT (for Gruppe II)
Mr David FEICKERT (for Group II)
David FEICKERT (for Gruppe II)
Mr. David FEICKERT  (for Group II)
David FEICKERT (for ordføreren)
Mr David FEICKERT (for the Rapporteur)
David Feickert (Gr.
Mr David Feickert (Gr.
David FEICKERT (Gruppe II)
Mr David Feickert (Group II expert)
David FODEN (for Gruppe II)
Mr David Foden (for  Group II)
David FODEN (for Gruppe II)
Mr David Foden (for Group II)
David Foden (for Gruppe II)
Mr David Foden (Group II expert)
David Foden (for Gruppe II)
Mr David Foden (for Group II)
David Foden (for Gruppe II) (E)
David Foden (for Group II) (UK)
David Foden (for Gruppe II) (EN)
Mr David Foden (for Group II) (UK)
David FODEN (for ordføreren)
Mr David Foden (for the rapporteur)
David Hawkins
Hawkins David
David LIPMAN
Mr David LIPMAN
David O'Sullivan indledte med at minde om, at EU fortsat var interesseret i bevarelsen af det multilaterale system, fordi multilateralisme fremmer handelsliberalisering.
Mr O'Sullivan began by saying that the EU was still interested in maintaining the multilateral system because multilateralism promoted free trade.
David O'Sullivan, generaldirektør, GD for Handel
Mr O'Sullivan, Director General, DG TRADE
David O'Sullivan, teknisk direktør, Tjenesten for EU's Optræden Udadtil.
Mr David O'Sullivan, Chief Operating Officer, European External Action Service.
David Praill (for Gruppe I)
Mr David Praill (for Group I)
David RICHARDSON (for Gruppe I)
Mr David Richardson (for Group I)
David Robert (for Gruppe III)
Mr David Robert (Group III)
David Sears
Mr Sears
David Sears
Mr Sears (UK–I)
David Sears (Arbejdsgivergruppen – UK)
David Sears (Employers – UK)
David Sears (art. 62 - Green)
Mr Sears (Rule 62, Green)
David Sears (art. 62 – Brendan Burns)
Mr Sears (Rule 62 – Mr Burns)
David Sears (art. 62 – Fraser) (UK-I)
Mr Sears (Rule 62: Fraser) (UK-I)
David Sears (for Green, art. 62)
Mr Sears (rule 62, Green)
David Sears (Gr.
Mr SEARS (Gr.
David Sears (UK - I)
Mr Sears (UK-I)
David Sears (UK-gr.
Mr Sears (UK-Gr.
David Sears (UK-I)
David Sears (UK-GRI)
David Sears (UK-I)
Mr David Sears (I-UK)
David Sears (UK-I)
Mr David Sears (I‑UK)
David Sears (UK-I)
Mr David Sears (UK-I)
David Sears (UK-I)
Mr Sears (UK-I)
David Sears (UK-I)
Sears (UK- I)
David Sears (UK-I)
Sears (UK-I)
David Sears (UK-I) (art. 62 for Bryan Cassidy)
Mr Sears (UK-I) (Rule 62 - Mr Cassidy)
David Sears (UK-I) (art. 62 – Burns)
Mr David Sears (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Burns)
David Sears (UK-I) (art. 62 – Claude Cambus)
Sears (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Cambus)
David Sears (UK-I) (art. 62 – Huvelin)
Mr Sears (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Huvelin)
David Sears (UK-I) (art. 62 – Morgan)
Mr Sears (UK-I) (Rule 62 - Morgan)
David Sears (UK-I) (art. 62 – Morgan)
Mr Sears (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Morgan)
David Sears (UK-I) (art. 62 – Sally Scutt)
Sears (UK-I) (Rule 62-Ms Scutt)
David Sears (UK-I) (art.62 for Jonathan Peel)
Sears (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Peel)
David Sears (UK-I) (art.62 – Burns)
Mr Sears (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Burns)
David Sears (UK-I) (for Bryan Cassidy, art. 62)
Mr Sears (UK-I) (Rule 62 – Cassidy)
David Sears (UK‑I) – art. 62 for Ben Butters
Mr Sears (UK – I) – Art 62 - Butters
David Sears (UK‑I) – art. 62 for Ben Butters
Mr Sears (UK-I) – Rule 62 - Butters
David Sears accepterede en ændring af punkt 4.8 som følge af Paolo Braghins bemærkninger, og sektionen gik over til afstemning.
Mr Sears agreed to amend point 4.8 following observations by Mr Braghin and the opinion was then put to the vote.
David Sears fremlagde forslaget til udtalelse.
Mr Sears presented the draft opinion.
David Sears mente, at Kommissionens beslutning om at anvende engelsk som kommunikationssprog (lingua franca) kunne skabe et strukturelt problem for EØSU.
Mr Sears felt that the adoption of English as a "lingua franca" by the European Commission could pose the EESC a number of structural problems.
David Sears takkede formanden for hans ord.
Mr Sears thanked the president for his words.
David Sears udtrykte tilfredshed med udtalelsen og mindede om, at vi alle er forbrugere, og at der er et reelt behov for, at disse ordninger indgår i en langsigtet læreproces.
Mr Sears congratulated the opinion and reminded that we are all consumers and that these systems are really needed as a long term learning process.
David Sears var ordfører.
The rapporteur was Mr Sears.
David Sears' ændringsforslag til punkt 1.2 blev vedtaget uden afstemning.
The amendment tabled by Mr Sears to point 1.2 was adopted without a vote.
David Sears, Jorge Pegado Liz, Wolfgang Greif, Laure Batut, Maureen O'Neill, Agnes Cser, Vladimira Drbalova, Richard Adams, Arthur Forbes, Giogios Dassis, Grace Attard, Erika Koller, An Le Nouail-Marlière og Xavier Verboven deltog i den generelle debat, der omhandlede formålet med udtalelsen og den stramme tidsfrist, at udtalelsen er første skridt i en længere proces, behovet for at styrke den europæiske socialpolitik, den annoncerede statusopgørelses repræsentative natur, borgernes rettigheder, behovet for at tage hensyn til den offentlige mening, risikoen for overlapning, behovet for at anerkende fattigdom i EU, den demografiske udfordring, mangfoldighed og uligheder, tværnational omstrukturering og behovet for, at EU bliver mere vedkommende for arbejdstagerne.
Mr Sears, Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Greif, Ms Batut, Ms O'Neill, Ms Cser, Ms Drbalovà, Mr Adams, Mr Forbes, Mr Dassis, Ms Attard, Ms Koller, Ms Le Nouail-Marlière and Mr Verboven spoke in the general debate, raising issues concerning the scope of the opinion and tight deadline, the opinion being a first step in a longer process, the need to strengthen European social policy, the representative nature of the stock-taking envisaged, citizens' rights, the need to take account of public opinion, the risk of duplication, the need to acknowledge poverty in the EU, the demographic challenge, diversities and inequalities, trans-national restructuring and the need for the EU to become more relevant to workers.
David Sears, ordfører (art. 62 – Peter Morgan)
Sears, Rapporteur (Rule 62 – Morgan)
David Searss
David Sears
David Smejkal
Mr Smejkal
David Smejkal (CZ-III)
Mr Smejkal (CZ-III)
David Smejkal (CZ-III)
Smejkal (CZ-III)
David Smejkal (CZ/III)
Mr Smejkal (CZ-III)
David Smejkal (Gr.
Mr Smejkal (Gr.
David Smejkal spurgte til opbygningen af en sund konkurrencekultur i nogle af de nye medlemsstater, hvor de nationale strukturer selv er ved at blive oplært i denne nye strategi.
Mr Smejkal wondered how a culture of healthy competition could be developed in some of the new Member States, when the national authorities were themselves new to this approach.
David Smejkal var uenig i de direkte anbefalinger til landene i regionen.
Mr Šmejkal disagreed with the direct recommendations for the countries of the region.
David Stulik
Mr Stulik
David Stulik (CZ-III)
Mr Stulik (CZ-III)
David Stulik beklagede, at ikke-statslige organisationer, især i de nye medlemsstater, stødte på lovgivningsmæssige og bureaukratiske vanskeligheder.
Mr Stulik deplored the legislative and bureaucratic difficulties encountered by NGOs, especially those in the new member countries.
David Stulik drog en parallel til situationen i de tidligere kommunistiske lande, da EU ville etablere forbindelser med civilsamfundet i disse lande.
Mr Stulik drew a parallel to the situation in the former communist countries and when the EU wanted to establish relations with civil society there.
David Stulik fremhævede, at EU ikke skal forsøge at gennemtvinge nogen modeller i AVS-landene.
Mr Stulik highlighted that the EU should not try to impose models on ACP countries.
David Stulik rejste spørgsmålet om, hvor man skulle indføje referencen til Tjetjenien, som aftalt i forbindelse med behandlingen af punkt 1.2.
Mr Stulik asked where the reference to Chechnya would be inserted, as decided during the discussion of point 1.2.
David Stulik understregede i sin præsentation af udtalelsen den alvorlige mangel på respekt for menneskerettighederne i Belarus især foreningsfriheden.
Mr Stulík presented the opinion, underlining the serious lack of respect for human rights in Belarus, particularly for the right of association.
David Stulik ønskede en debat om Hviderusland og slog til lyd for at udarbejde en initiativudtalelse om landet.
Mr Stulik called for a debate on Belarus, a matter on which he suggested an own-initiative opinion be drawn up.
David Stulik, Ivana Plechata og Tomasz Czajkowski fremsatte følgende ændringsforslag:
Mr Stulík, Ms Plechata and Mr Czajkowski presented the following amendment:
David Stulík
Mr Stulík
David Stulík præsenterede ændringsforslaget.
Mr Stulík presented the amendment.
David Stulík trak sit ændringsforslag til punkt 4.7 tilbage.
Mr Stulík withdrew his amendment to point 4.7.
David Tarren (for medordføreren) (UK)
Mr David Tarren (for the co-rapporteur) (UK)
David Tompkins
Mr David Tompkins
David WHITEHEAD (for medordføreren WHITWORTH - havne)
Mr David WHITEHEAD (for the Co-Rapporteur, Mr WHITWORTH - Ports)
David Whitehead (for ordføreren)
David Whitehead (for the rapporteur)
David Wilkins, MA MRCVS (for ordføreren)
Mr David Wilkins, MA MRCVS (for the rapporteur)
David Williams
Mr David Williams
David WOOD (for Gruppe I)
Mr David WOOD (for Group I)
David YOUNG (for ordføreren)
Mr David YOUNG (for the Rapporteur)
David Šmejkal
Mr David Šmejkal
David Šmejkal
Smejkal
David Šmejkal (CZ-III)
Mr Smejkal (CZ-III)
Davide Scelzo (for ordføreren)
Mr Davide Scelzo (for the rapporteur)
David Sears (UK-I)
Mr Sears (UK-I)
David Sears mente, at tiden med billige energikilder var en saga blott, at energipriserne var steget kraftigt, men at økonomien og forbrugernes tilværelse ikke havde ændret sig synderligt.
Mr Sears was of the view that the era of cheap energy supplies was over, that energy prices had risen steeply, but that the life of the economy and consumers had hardly changed.
David Yeandle
David Yeandle
DAVIES (Oil Company Executive - konsulent for Gruppe I)
Davies (Oil Company Executive - Assistant Group I)
Davies-rapporten påviste en mangel på arbejdskraft i Det Forenede Kongerige, som kan udbedres ved at engagere to millioner kvalificerede arbejdstagere i løbet af de næste 10 år, hvoraf de fleste bør være højtkvalificerede kvinder5.
The Davies report identified a gap in the UK workforce which could be compensated for by the recruitment of 2 million qualified workers over the next 10 years, most of which would need to be highly qualified women5.
Davignon-rapporten blev offentliggjort i juli 2000.
The Davignon Report was issued in July 2000.
Davignon-rapporten har givet inspiration til det luxembourgske kompromisforslag.
The Davignon report had provided a basis for a compromise proposal from the Luxembourg presidency.
Davignon-rapporten udkom i juli 2000.
The Davignon Report was issued in July 2000.
Davis Rodwell (for Gruppe III)
Mr Davis Rodwell   (for Group III)
DAVISON
Mrs
DAVISON
Mrs Davison
Davison
Ms Davison
DAVISON (*)
Davison
Davison (*) (fuldmagt til Williams)
DAVISON (*) (proxy : WILLIAMS)
DAVISON (art. 53 - WILLIAMS)
Davison (Rule 53, Williams)
Davison (art. 54 - Mengozzi)
Davison (Rule 54 - Mr Mengozzi)
Davison (art. 54 - Nilsson)
DAVISON (Rule 54 - NILSSON)
Davison (art. 54 - Persson)
Davison (Rule 54, Mrs Persson)
DAVISON (art. 54 stk. 1 og 2 for zu EULENBURG)
Davison (Rule 54(1 and 2) - Mrs zu Eulenburg)
Davison (art. 54)
Davison (Rule 54)
Davison (art. 54, Nilsson)
Davison (Nilsson, Rule 54 RP)
Davison (art. 54, Nilsson)
DAVISON, R 54 NILSSON
DAVISON (art. 61 for ADAMS)
Davison (Rule 61, Mr Adams)
DAVISON (art. 62 – Olsson)
Davison (Rule 62 – Olsson)
DAVISON (art. 62)
Davison (Rule 62)
Davison (artikel 54 - Hassett)
Davison (Rule 54 - Mrs Hassett)
Davison (artikel 54 - Sigmund)
Davison (Rule 54 - Mrs Sigmund)
DAVISON (artikel 62 for Sigmund)
DAVISON (Rule 62 – Mrs Sigmund)
Davison (fuldmagt for Glatz)
Davison (proxy for Glatz)
Davison (fuldmagt fra Costa Macedo)
Davison  (voting rights of Mrs Costa Macedo)
DAVISON (fuldmagt fra ELSTNER)
Davison (voting rights of Elstner)
Davison (fuldmagt fra Glatz)
DAVISON (voting rights of GLATZ)
Davison (fuldmagt fra Jaschick)
Davison (proxy for Jaschick)
Davison (fuldmagt fra Jaschick)
Davison (voting rights of Mr Jaschick)
DAVISON (fuldmagt fra STRÖM)
Davison (voting rights of Ström)
Davison (fuldmagt fra Williams)
DAVISON (voting rights of WILLIAMS)
Davison (fuldmagt til Jaschick)
Davison (voting rights to Jaschick)
Davison (fuldmagt til Williams)
Davison (voting rights to Williams)
DAVISON (Medordfører)
Davison (co-rapporteur)
DAVISON (Medordfører)
Mrs Davison (Co-Rapporteur)
DAVISON (ordfører) (art. 54 – Olsson)
Davison (Rapporteur) (Rule 54 – Olsson)
DAVISON (Ordfører) (art. 62 – Olsson)
Davison (rapporteur) (Rule 62 – Olsson)
Davison (ordfører) (art. 54 - Williams)
Ms Davison (Rapporteur) (Rule 54 - Ms Williams)
Davison (UK)
Ms Davison (UK)
Davison (UK-III)
Mrs Davison (UK-III)
Davison (UK-III)
Ms Davison (UK-III)
Davison (UK-III) (art. 54 - Inger Persson)
Mrs Davison (Rule 54 - Mrs Persson) (UK-III)
Davison (UK‑III)
Caball i Subirana (ES-III)
Davison Ann
Davison   Ann
Davison bad Koryfídis om kort at redegøre for sit arbejde vedrørende civilsamfundets rolle i EU's eksterne forbindelser.
Ms  Davison asked Mr Koryfídis to make a short presentation of his work on the role of civil society in the EU's external relations.
Davison beklagede den forsinkede procedure for udnævnelse af en ny direktør for EØSU’s direktorat A.
Ms Davison expressed regret at the delay in the appointment procedure for a new director of EESC Directorate A.
Davison benyttede lejligheden til at takke alle for at have bidraget til at gøre arrangementet til en stor succes.
Ms Davison took the opportunity to congratulate everyone for the huge success of the event.
DAVISON erklærede sig parat til at støtte KOOPMAN's kompromisforslag om subsidieringsspørgsmålet.
Mrs Davison expressed her readiness to support the compromise proposal regarding subsidies put forward by Mr Koopman.
DAVISON fandt nok udtalelsen god, men mente dog, at nogle af forslagene deri gik for langt.
Mrs DAVISON considered that, although it was a good Opinion, some of its proposals went too far.
Davison fandt, at teksten tog afsæt i en protektionistisk grundholdning, som hun ikke delte, og som ville være skadelig for udviklingslandene.
Mrs Davison took the view that the text reflected a protectionist approach which she did not favour and which would be harmful to developing countries.
DAVISON foreslog at affatte punkt 3.2.2. således:
Mrs Davison proposed replacing point 3.2.2 with the following:
DAVISON foreslog at der i punkt 3.1.6.6., andet punktum efter "mærkebaserede programmer for kød" blev tilføjet følgende: "opfedningsmetoder, f.eks. på græsmarker".
In point 3.1.6.6, after "brand-based schemes", Mrs Davison proposed adding "feeding methods e.g. grass fed".
DAVISON foreslog at lade andet punktum i punkt 2.2.5. udgå til fordel for følgende:
Mrs Davison proposed deleting the second sentence of point 2.2.5 and replacing it with the following:
DAVISON foreslog at lade pkt. 3.6.3. udgå.
Mrs DAVISON proposed deleting point 3.6.3.
DAVISON foreslog at tilføje følgende i sidste led i punkt 3.5.1.3.:
Mrs Davison proposed that the words "consumer representation" be added to the list in the last indent of point 3.5.3.3.
DAVISON foreslog, at man i punkt 3.1.2. i anden linje slettede ordene "og leverer hele deres produktion".
Mrs DAVISON proposed deleting the words "and to deliver all their production to them" in point 3.1.2.
DAVISON foreslog, at man i punkt 3.2.3. i tredje linje indføjede ordene "(... samme krav) om mærkning".
Mrs DAVISON proposed replacing the words "the same requirements" in the third line of point 3.2.3 by "the same labelling requirements".
DAVISON foreslog, at man i punkt 3.4.2., første linje, indføjede ordet "... (forudfastsat) maksimal (tilbagekøbssats) ..."
In the first line of point 3.4.2., Mrs DAVISON proposed replacing the word "percentages" by "maximum percentages".
Davison foreslog, at man ændrede ordlyden, således at formandens rolle fremstod mere klart.
Ms Davison proposed amending the text by specifying the role of the president.
DAVISON forslog at slette punkt 2.2.8.
Mrs Davison proposed deleting point 2.2.8.
DAVISON forsvarede forbrugernes interesser og miljøet og glædede sig over, at ordføreren havde accepteret de pågældende ændringsforslag.
Mrs Davison spoke in defence of consumers' and environmental interests: she was satisfied with the rapporteur's agreement on the relevant amendments.
DAVISON fremhævede de områder, hvor EU og Canada er tæt på hinanden, samt at de har samme holdning til udviklingshjælp og miljøspørgsmål.
Mrs Davison stressed the factors bringing Canada and the European Union closer together, and their shared views on development aid and the environment.
Davison fremlagde sit ændringsforslag, der sigtede på at ændre slutningen af stk. 1 som følger:
Ms Davison submitted her amendment seeking to amend the end of this paragraph to read as follows:
DAVISON godkendte forslaget, og det således ændrede ændringsforslag blev enstemmigt vedtaget.
Mrs DAVISON accepted this, and the modified amendment was adopted unanimously.
DAVISON godkendte ordførerens forslag.
Mrs DAVISON accepted this.
DAVISON havde undladt at stemme, fordi der ikke var blevet taget hensyn til hendes ændringsforslag om antibiotika.
Mrs Davison said that she had abstained because her amendment had not been adopted.
Davison indledte en foreløbig, generel debat om sektionens prioriteter, idet hun bemærkede, at REX-sektionens indsats med hensyn til Euromed, AVS, Latinamerika og Indien er forudbestemt af Kommissionen og Rådets interesser.
Ms Davison opened a preliminary general discussion on the section priorities, noting that our commitment to Euromed, ACP, Latin Amercia and India are pre-determined by the Commission and the Council's interests.
Davison indledte en generel debat, og heri deltog Hamro-Drotz, Nilsson, D'sa, López Almendáriz, St. Hill, Dimitriádis, Soares, Ehnmark, Le Nouail og Donnelly.
Ms Davison opened a general discussion in which Mr Hamro-Drotz, Mr Nilsson, Ms D’Sa, Ms López Almendáriz, Ms St Hill, Mr Dimitriádis, Mr Soares, Mr Ehnmark, Ms Le Nouail and Mr Donnelly spoke.
Davison mente, at udtalelsen burde henvises til REX-sektionen på grund af ordet "global", mens Sigmund og Beirnaert var tilbøjelige til at mene, at sagen burde henvises til SOC-sektionen på baggrund af dennes tidligere arbejde med virksomhedernes sociale ansvar.
Whereas Ms Davison felt that the opinion should be allocated to the REX section, since it addressed the issue of globalisation, Ms Sigmund and Mr Beirnaert felt that it should be given to the SOC section, in view of the latter’s previous work on corporate responsibility.
Davison og Espuny forbeholdt sig imidlertid ret til at forelægge andre forslag til initiativudtalelser for deres respektive sektioner på næste præsidiemøde.
However, Ms Davison and Mr Espuny reserved the right to submit other proposals for own-initiative opinions for their respective sections at the next Bureau meeting.
DAVISON om de ikke-statslige organisationers store betydning for en god forvaltningspraksis og det  decentrale arbejde.
Mrs Davison, on the crucial role played by NGOs in good governance and decentralized cooperation;
Davison opfordrede Secke-Poucka, national koordinator for SOS Women, til kort at fortælle om organisationens aktiviteter.
Ms Davison invited Ms Secke-Poucka, National coordinator for SOS Women, to briefly explain the activities of her organisation.
DAVISON påpegede endvidere, at den fælles landbrugspolitiks store andel af EU's samlede budget gør landbruget upopulært i medlemsstaterne.
Ms Davison also drew attention to the Cap's large share of the EU budget, which was the reason for agriculture's unpopularity in Member States.
Davison refererede ligeledes til mødet med medformændene for Rundbordsdialogen EU-Indien, seminaret om kulturel og religiøs pluralisme i demokratiske samfund og det fjerde møde i Kontaktgruppen for Det vestlige Balkan.
Ms Davison also referred to the meeting of the co-chairpersons of the India-EU Round Table and the Seminar on "cultural and religious pluralism in democratic societies" as well as the 4th meeting of the Contact Group on Western Balkans.
Davison sagde, at det var en fremragende udtalelse og fremhævede problemerne med at håndhæve forbrugerbeskyttelseslovgivningen.
Mrs Davison thought that the opinion was excellent.
DAVISON sagde, at hun ville fremsætte ændringsforslag på plenarforsamlingen.
Mrs Davison said that she intended to table amendments at the plenary session.
DAVISON stillede tre spørgsmål til hr. HUEBEL: 1.
Mrs Davison posed three questions for Mr Huebel: 1.
DAVISON udtrykte tilfredshed med Kommissionens initiativ og med den mulighed, som her blev givet forbrugerne for at få adgang til oplysninger.
Mrs Davison welcomed the Commission's initiative and the chance for consumers to have access to data.
Davison understregede vigtigheden af koordinering mellem kontrolmyndighederne og nævnte et initiativ, som Storbritannien havde taget under sit formandskab, og som burde støttes for at gøre koordineringen permanent.
Mrs Davison stressed the importance of coordination between the supervisory and executive authorities and referred to the steps taken by the UK presidency to put such coordination on a permanent footing.
Davison ønskede også mere vidtgående reformer på andre områder, f.eks. sukker.
Mrs Davison sought more far-reaching reforms, in other areas too, such as sugar.
DAVISON's og KOOPMAN's ændringsforslag til punkt 2.1.2 (betydningen af videnskabelige komiteers kompetence, uafhængighed og åbenhed) i del II (om Kommissionens meddelelse) stødte på modstand fra REITERER.
The amendment to point 2.1.2 in part II of the draft opinion, tabled by Mrs Davison and Mr Koopman (importance of expertise, independence and transparency of scientific committees) was opposed by Mr Reiterer.
Davison's ændringsforslag blev sat til afstemning og vedtaget med 90 stemmer for, 41 imod og 2 hverken for eller imod.
When put to the vote, the amendment of Ms Davison was adopted by 90 votes to 41, with 2 abstentions.
DAVISON*
Davison (*)
Davison*
Guillaume