natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bruno Vever fandt det indlysende, at denne bemærkelsesværdige udtalelse vil være en ledetråd for EØSU's arbejde mange år frem.
For Mr Vever it was evident that this landmark opinion would guide the Committee's work in the years to come.
Bruno Vever fandt, at ØSU kunne være stolt af teksten.
Mr Vever congratulated the ESC on the text.
Bruno Vever foreslog følgende tilføjelse sidst i punktet:
Mr Vever proposed to add at the end of the sentence:
Bruno Vever foreslog følgende tilføjelse sidst i punktet:
Mr Vever proposed to add at the end:
Bruno Vever foreslog, at man altid vedtog en udtalelse til forårstopmødet, og han beklagede den foruroligende situation i medlemsstaterne med hensyn til fremskridt hen imod Lissabon‑målene.
Mr Vever proposed to always adopt an opinion for the spring Summit and he deplored the alarming situation in the member states regarding progress towards the Lisbon targets.
Bruno Vever foreslog, at man indføjede en henvisning til behovet for at undersøge muligheden for et samarbejde med tværgående data og informationstjenester så som EU's PRISMA-projekt.
Mr Vever suggested including a reference to the need of exploring cooperation with cross-cutting data and information services such as the EU's PRISMA project.
Bruno Vever foreslog, at udtalelsens konklusioner anførte nogle eksempler på avanceret teknologi, der bør udvikles.
Mr Vever proposed that some examples be given in the opinion conclusions of advanced technologies that had to be developed.
Bruno Vever fremlagde nogle nøgletal om Senegal og henstillede til sektionen, at man især koncentrerede sig om åbningen af landet for handel og dets økonomiske og handelsmæssige udvikling.
Mr Vever presented some basic facts about Senegal and recommended that where that country was concerned, the section focus on the issues of trade liberalisation and economic and commercial development.
Bruno Vever fremlagde sin udtalelse, idet han bl.a. mindede om de forskellige juridiske etaper i ansøgerlandenes optagelse i ØMU'en.
Mr Vever presented the opinion, referring, among other things, to the various legal stages which the applicant countries had to complete before they could accede to EMU.
Bruno Vever fremlagde ændringsforslaget, hvorefter der skulle indsættes et punktum i punkt 2.
Mr Vever presented the amendment, which suggested adding a sentence to point 2.
Bruno Vever gjorde opmærksom på, at man på mødet i Det Europæiske Råd den 21.‑22. marts 2003 havde besluttet, at Kommissionen skulle oprette en europæisk taskforce for beskæftigelse.
Mr Vever pointed out that the Commission was to establish a European Employment Taskforce, following a decision of the Brussels European Council of 20-21 March.
Bruno Vever havde følgende kommentarer:
Mr Vever made the following comments:
Bruno VEVER havde indgivet et ændringsforslag om tilføjelse af et nyt punkt 5:
Mr Vever had proposed the following amendment as a new point 5.
Bruno Vever henledte opmærksomheden på, at en statut for SMV'er er en løsning på et problem, der stadig er til stede i det indre marked.
Mr Vever noted that a statute for SMEs would close a loophole remaining in the internal market.
Bruno Vever henviste til de meget interessante resultater fra den ekspertrunde, der blev afholdt hos Den Europæiske Patentmyndighed i München.
Mr Vever pointed to the very interesting results of the round of expert discussions held in Munich at the European Patent Office.
Bruno Vever henviste til sine ændringsforslag, som har til formål at etablere en balance i udtalelsen hvad angår den generelle analyse, de planlagte foranstaltninger og de anvendte sprog.
Mr Vever referred to his proposed amendments, designed to restore the Opinion's balance in areas such as the general analysis, the measures foreseen, and the language used.
Bruno Vever hilste henstillingen om supplerende finansielle ressourcer til udvikling velkommen, men understregede, at regional integration og en bedre balance i WTO-regelsættet er nødvendige forudsætninger for udvikling.
Mr Vever welcomed the recommendation for additional financial resources for development, but stressed that regional integration and more balanced WTO rules are also necessary conditions for development.
Bruno Vever insisterede på, at ØSU skal bidrage til de årlige forårstopmøder om økonomiske og sociale anliggender.
Mr Vever insisted that the Committee should contribute every year to the spring summit on economic and social issues.
Bruno Vever kommenterede behovet for integrering af ligestillingsaspektet, men advarede mod at fastsætte kønskvoter for de internationale organisationers udpegning af repræsentanter.
Mr Vever commented on the necessity for gender mainstreaming, but warned against imposing gender quotas on the international organisations which nominate the delegates.
Bruno VEVER kommenterede de to indlæg.
Mr VEVER replied to both statements.
Bruno Vever konstaterede således, at EU er blevet en skueplads for stridigheder mellem medlemsstaterne og opfordrede derfor til at bekæmpe alle forsøg på at ødelægge det, han kaldte de europæiske borgerprojekter.
Mr Vever thus noted that the European Union was becoming a battleground for disputes between Member States and called for any attempt to break up what he called European citizens' agendas to be fought.
Bruno Vever krævede, at udtalelsen klart skulle sige ja eller nej til indledning af forhandlinger.
Mr Vever asked that the opinion should come out clearly either for or against the start of negotiations.
Bruno VEVER kunne følge Wilfred ASPINALL så vidt, at også han ønskede en analyse af konsekvenserne i tilfælde af, at kun nogle medlemsstater tiltrådte ØMU.
Mr VEVER agreed with Mr ASPINALL's call for an analysis of what would happen if only a few Member States joined economic and monetary union.
Bruno Vever lykønskede ordføreren med den fortræffelige udtalelse.
Mr Vever congratulated the rapporteur on the excellent opinion.
Bruno VEVER mente heller ikke, at Amsterdam-traktatens reform af EU‑institutionernes organisation er tilstrækkeligt omfattende til at kunne sikre, at et udvidet EU kan fungere.
Mr Vever also felt that the institutional reforms ushered in by the Amsterdam Treaty were inadequate for the operation of an enlarged European Union.
Bruno Vever mente, at det sjette rammeprogram rent faktisk fremkom på det rigtige tidspunkt, nemlig i forbindelse med tilsagnene fra Lissabon, og at det burde udgøre et nøgleværktøj i den forbindelse.
Mr Vever considered that the VI framework programme had indeed come at the right moment, with the Lisbon commitments and that therefore it should be a key tool.
Bruno Vever mente, at direktivforslaget var kontroversielt og skulle ændres.
Mr Vever felt that the proposed directive was too controversial and should be amended.
Bruno Vever mente, at forslaget i den nuværende formulering var en blanding af interventioner på forskellige samfundsniveauer: medlemsstaten, arbejdsmarkedets parter og enkeltpersoner.
Mr Vever felt that the proposal as it stood was a mix of intervention at different levels of society: the Member State, the social partners and the individual.
Bruno Vever mente, at ideen om "det organiserede civilsamfund" kunne give ØSU mulighed for at genvinde sin rolle som den institution, der er bedst placeret til at mindske afstanden mellem EU og borgerne og derigennem give begrebet et reelt indhold.
Mr Vever felt that the concept of "civil society organisations" could help boost the Committee's legitimacy, as the ESC was ideally placed to bring the European institutions and citizens closer together and give shape to the concept.
Bruno Vever mente, at medlemsstaterne er nødt til at sænke de høje arbejdsgiverafgifter for at forbedre deres konkurrenceevne på markederne.
In the view of Mr Vever there was a need to reduce the high level of taxation in the Member States in order to achieve improved competitiveness in markets.
Bruno Vever mente, at teksten i højere grad burde bygge på europæiske værdier, som er åbne over for andre.
Mr Vever felt that the text should be underpinned to a greater extent by European values, open to all.
Bruno Vever mente, at WTO-kontaktgruppen opretholdes tillige med deltagelsen i høringsgrupperne i generaldirektoratet for handel.
Mr Vever gave his view that the ESC WTO contact group should continue as should the Committee's participation in DG Trade consultation groups.
Bruno Vever mindede om konkurrencepolitikkens afgørende rolle i det indre marked og kom ind på spørgsmålet om offentlig støtte, herunder fra EU, især i forbindelse med EU's udvidelse.
Mr Vever recalled the fundamental role of competition policy in the running of the single market, as well as the question of public aid, including Community aid, especially in the context of EU enlargement.
Bruno Vever mindede om, at det indre marked endnu ikke er en realitet, og at arbejdet derhen imod ikke er tilstrækkeligt effektivt.
Mr Vever recalled that the internal market had not yet been completed and its integration was not very efficient.
Bruno Vever mindede ordføreren om, at den tekst, der var blevet vedtaget af sektionen, burde have omhandlet fastboende udlændinge med lovlig opholdstilladelse.
Mr Vever reminded the rapporteur that the text adopted in section should have referred to legal long-term residents.
Bruno Vever nævnte det vigtige i at nå frem til en balance mellem de forskellige interesser og udtrykte håb om, at de nye regler i Amsterdam-traktaten, som gav medlemsstaterne større fleksibilitet på visse felter, ville blive benyttet på ansvarlig vis.
Mr Vever recalled the importance of striking a balance between the different interests, expressing the hope that the new rules in the Amsterdam Treaty, giving the Member States more flexibility within certain areas, would be used in the most responsible way.
Bruno Vever nævnte, at kodeksen om forenkling, sam- og selvregulering, som var af fundamental betydning for Kommissionens arbejde, var blevet vedtaget den 16. december 2003.
Mr Vever pointed out that the code on simplification, co-regulation and self-regulation had been adopted on 16 December 2003 and was fundamental for the Commission's legislative work.
Bruno Vever og Daniel Retureau bemærkede, at denne vigtige og meget aktuelle udtalelse supplerer de to udtalelser om udvidelsen, som tidligere er blevet vedtaget.
Mr Vever and Mr Retureau noted the value and timeliness of this opinion, which complemented the two opinions on enlargement that had previously been adopted.
Bruno VEVER og John LYONS var imod forslaget med henvisning til deres tidligere indvendinger.
Mr VEVER and Mr LYONS said that they were against the amendment, recalling their previous objections.
Bruno Vever og José Bento Gonçalves gjorde rede for, hvorfor de havde stemt, som de gjorde.
Mr Vever and Mr Bento Gonçalves explained their reasons for voting against.
Bruno Vever om den nødvendige støtte til ILO's centrale rolle og den støtte, der bør ydes udviklingslandene for at få dem til at acceptere en udvidelse af dagsordenen for forhandlingerne.
Mr Vever spoke on the necessary support for the central role played by the ILO and the support to be given to developing countries to persuade them to accept a broadening of the agenda for the negotiations.
Bruno Vever opridsede herefter nogle hovedkonklusioner: nye medlemsstater skulle forpligtes til at deltage i den europæiske valutakursmekanisme (ERM2) ved deres tiltrædelse af EU.
Mr Vever went on to outline some key conclusions: New Member States should be required join the ERM2, the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, on entering the EU.
Bruno Vever præsenterede hovedpunkterne i udtalelsen og nævnte især følgende henstillinger:
Mr Vever presented the main lines of his opinion.
Bruno Vever påpegede, at debatten om nye styreformer drejer sig om kravet om, at institutionernes praksis er bedre tilpasset borgerens behov, og at der skal tages hensyn til udvidelsesperspektivet.
Mr Vever noted that the debate on governance was to be seen against the need to  better adapt institutional practices to the ordinary citizen, bearing in mind forthcoming enlargement.
Bruno Vever påpegede, at der var tale om noget faktuelt, som han fandt af stor strategisk betydning.
Mr Vever explained that this was a fact that in his view was of major strategic importance.
Bruno Vever påpegede, at Europa manglede den form for lederskab, det havde haft i tidligere tider, og havde brug for at finde en vej fremad.
Mr Vever pointed out that Europe lacked the leadership it had had in the past and needed to find a way forward.
Bruno Vever påpegede, at Lissabonstrategien, hvis mål det var at gøre EU til den mest konkurrencedygtige økonomi i verden, var en total fiasko, og at Kommissionen ikke havde påtaget sig ansvaret for at udarbejde en rapport på området.
Mr Vever pointed out that the Lisbon strategy, whose aim was to make the EU the most competitive economy in the world, was a complete failure and the European Commission had not taken the responsibility of producing a report on the matter.
Bruno Vever redegjorde for hovedlinjerne i sin udtalelse.
Mr Vever outlined his opinion.
Bruno Vever redegjorde for hovedlinjerne i sit forslag til udtalelse, herunder især:
Mr Vever outlined the main points of his opinion.
Bruno Vever redegjorde også i hovedtræk for målene for det kommende 8. regionale seminar mellem arbejdsmarkedsorganisationerne i AVS og EU, som afholdes af EØSU i Bamako, Mali den 22.-24. maj 2006 med blandt andet følgende punkter:
Mr Vever also outlined the objectives of the forthcoming 8th Regional Seminar of ACP-EU Economic and Social Interest Groups, to be organised by the EESC in Bamako, Mali on 22 to 24 May 2006, which include:
Bruno Vever roste ordføreren, som havde udarbejdet en udtalelse, der supplerede andet arbejde vedrørende den fri bevægelighed og det indre marked.
Mr Vever congratulated the rapporteur on an opinion which complemented others dealing with free movement and the Single Market.
Bruno Vever sagde, at det havde været et stort og kompliceret emne at behandle.
Mr Vever stated that it had been a vast and complex subject to deal with.
Bruno VEVER sagde, at han delte nogle af de bekymringer, som var kommet til udtryk, selv om han kunne tilslutte sig hensigten med de foreslåede foranstaltninger.
Mr VEVER echoed some of the concerns of the previous speakers, although he accepted the Commission's objectives.
Bruno Vever sagde, at meningsforskellene mellem arbejdsmarkedsparterne og de respektive regeringer vedrørende den sociale dialogs effektivitet i ansøgerlandene demonstrerer behovet for at tage styreformerne op til revision i forbindelse med udvidelsen.
Mr Vever said the discrepancies between the views of the social partners and their respective governments as to the effectiveness of social dialogue in the candidate countries demonstrated the urgency of rethinking governance in the context of enlargement.
Bruno Vever spurgte, hvad Karolus-programmet nøjagtigt dækker, og om det er hensigten at forlænge Mattheus-programmet (vedrørende toldsamarbejde) på tilsvarende måde for at tilpasse det til de associerede lande.
Mr Vever asked what the Karolus programme covers exactly and whether it is intended to extend the Mattheus programme - which deals with customs cooperation - in the same way as Karolus, in order for it to apply to the associated countries.
Bruno Vever stillede følgende ændringsforslag:
Mr Vever tabled the following amendment:
Bruno Vever støttede ligeledes udtalelsen og understregede, at civilsamfundets aktører må bakke charteret op med vilje til dialog og ansvarlighed.
Mr Vever also supported the Opinion, stressing the need for the Charter to be accompanied  by a spirit of dialogue and responsibility by civil society players.
Bruno Vever syntes også det var vigtigt, at der kommer et udspil fra ØSU.
Mr Vever likewise felt it was important for the ESC to contribute.
Bruno Vever syntes, at skattetrykket i Den Europæiske Union generelt er for højt og på forhånd lægger en dæmper på ethvert muligt opsving.
Mr Vever thought the tax burden in the EU was generally too high, and a drag on any upturn in the economy.
Bruno Vever så gerne, at udvidelsen styrkede tilliden til EU.
Mr Vever, hoped enlargement would boost confidence in the European Union.
Bruno Vever så årsagen hertil i, at EØSU blev hørt samtidig med de besluttende institutioner, Rådet og Europa-Parlamentet - med andre ord for sent, så udvalgets udtalelser, uanset deres eventuelle kvaliteter, fik mindre indflydelse.
Mr Vever thought this was due to the fact that the Committee was notified at the same time as the decision-making bodies – the European Parliament and the Council – i.e. too late, which reduced the impact of its opinions, regardless of their quality.
Bruno Vever takkede for de forskellige indlæg og foreslog plenarforsamlingen, at man i udtalelsen også nævner behovet for tvistbilæggelse samt spørgsmålet om de negative konsekvenser, som sanktioner kan have for virksomheder.
Mr Vever thanked the various speakers and suggested that mention of the need for conflict settlement be inserted in the opinion together with a reference to the detrimental effects that sanctions might have on businesses.
Bruno Vever takkede for indlæggene og var rede til at imødekomme visse af de udtrykte synspunkter.
Mr Vever thanked the speakers and promised to accommodate the various points of view expressed.
Bruno Vever tilsluttede sig den forrige taler.
Mr Vever endorsed the observations made by the previous speaker.
Bruno Vever understregede behovet for en løbende opfølgning af forenklingsprocessen  - herunder en strengere håndhævelse af ØSU's egen adfærdskodeks – og lagde navnlig vægt på med- og selvregulering med inddragelse af det organiserede civilsamfund.
Mr Vever underlined the need for an ongoing follow-up to the simplification process - including a more rigorous enforcement of the Committee's own Code of Conduct - and placed particular emphasis on co- and self-regulation, with the involvement of organized civil society.
Bruno Vever understregede de private investeringers betydning for væksten og fremgangen i beskæftigelsen i relation til Lissabon-strategien.
Mr Vever spoke of the importance of private investment for growth and employment in view of the Lisbon Strategy.
Bruno Vever understregede den store betydning, som euroens indførelse ville få for det industrielle samarbejde i Europa og for forøgelsen af våbeneksporten.
Mr Vever underlined the importance of the introduction of the euro to industrial cooperation in Europe and to the increase in arms exports.
Bruno Vever understregede, at det var umuligt at vurdere nøjagtigt, hvilken retning forhandlingerne ville tage.
Mr Vever stressed that it was impossible to make a precise assessment of the progress of the negotiations.
Bruno Vever understregede, at dokumentet var en ægte fornyelsesplan og langt mere end en informationsrapport.
Mr Vever stressed that, more than an information report, the document was an innovation plan in its own right.
Bruno Vever understregede, at eftersom Amsterdam-traktaten har givet Europa‑Parlamentet ret til at høre ØSU, ville det være ønskeligt, om ØSU arbejdede tæt sammen med denne institution.
Mr Vever stressed that since the Treaty of Amsterdam had given the Committee a consultative role in relation to the Parliament, it would be preferable to work in close collaboration with that institution.
Bruno Vever understregede, at meningsmålinger tydede på, at borgerne var utilfredse med visse af den europæiske integrations teknokratiske sider, men at de ikke var utilfredse med integrationen i sig selv.
Mr Vever pointed out that opinion polls showed there was discontent about certain technocratic aspects of European integration and not vis-à-vis the integration process itself.
Bruno Vever understregede, at risikofaktorerne i forbindelse med ratificeringen af forfatningstraktaten ikke bør forhindre EU-institutionerne i at skride til handling og tage initiativer på de områder, der direkte påvirker borgerne, og som beviser merværdien ved EU’s arbejde.
Mr Vever emphasised that the ups and downs of the process of ratifying the Constitution should not stop the European institutions from acting and taking initiatives in areas that have a direct impact on the public and demonstrate the added value of Community action.
Bruno Vever undrede sig over, hvorfor Kommissionen havde ventet med at fremlægge meddelelsen om de strategiske retningslinjer til et år efter meddelsen om samhørighedspolitikken 2007-2013, og hvorfor de tre strategiske prioriteter ikke svarede til de tre målsætninger, som var blevet opstillet for samhørighedspolitikken.
Mr Vever enquired into the reasons which had led the Commission to present the document on the strategic guidelines one year after the document on cohesion policy 2007–2013 and into why the three strategic priorities did not correspond with the three objectives set by cohesion policy.
Bruno Vever var bange for, at Lissabon-strategien snarere var et udtryk for retorik snarere end hensyntagen til de reelle forhold i de nationale politikker.
Mr Vever feared that the Lisbon Strategy was becoming more a matter of rhetoric and  less a reality underpinned by national policy.
Bruno Vever var enig i sine kollegers bemærkninger om, at Colin Lustenhouwer havde gjort et stort stykke arbejde for FTM.
Mr Vever echoed his colleagues' comments regarding Mr Lustenhouwer's hard work on behalf of the AFM.
Bruno Vever var overrasket over, at tvangsarbejde og børnearbejde ikke er nævnt i udtalelsen.
Mr Vever expressed his surprise that the practices of forced and child labour in China had not been mentioned in the opinion.
Bruno Vever var tilfreds med udtalelsen og lykønskede ordføreren med det opnåede resultat.
Mr Vever was satisfied with the document and congratulated the rapporteur on his work.
Bruno Vever – I
Mr Bruno Vever - I
Bruno Vever, Christa Schweng og Johannes Kleemann havde indgivet ændringsforslag.
Amendments had been tabled by Mr Vever and by Mrs Schweng and Mr Kleemann.
Bruno Vever, formand for Markedsobservatoriet, og ordfører for udtalelsen om forenkling, som også indeholder adfærdskodeksen, forklarede indledningsvis, at der er tale om institutionernes funktion i lyset af Kommissionens hvidbog om nye styreformer.
Mr Vever, president of the Single Market Observatory and rapporteur for the opinion on simplification containing the code of conduct, began by explaining that the question related to how the institutions worked, and should be seen in the context of the Commission's White Paper on European Governance.
Bruno Vever, Kenneth Walker og Aina Margareta Regnell forelagde deres ændringsforslag til punkt 1.1.7:
Mr Vever, Mr Walker and Mrs Regnell presented their amendment to point 1.1.7.
Bruno Vever, Kenneth Walker og Aina Margareta Regnell forelagde deres ændringsforslag til punkt 4.1.4.1:
Mr Vever, Mr Walker and Mrs Regnell presented their amendment to point 4.1.4.1.
Bruno Vever, Sergio Santillán Cabeza og Lars Nyberg fremsatte over for Servaas Deroose en række bemærkninger vedrørende enkelte punkter i EØSU's udtalelse.
Mr Vever, Mr Santillan and Mr Nyberg made a number of comments to Mr Deroose on certain points already mentioned in the EESC opinion.
Bruno Vever, stedfortræder for sektionens formand, orienterede om sektionens sagsbehandling.
The vice-president of the Section for the Single Market, Production and Consumption, Mr Vever, explained the progress of discussions in the section.
Bruno Vever:
Mr Vever
Bruno Vever: sammenligningen mellem EU's indre marked og det amerikanske marked samt denne aftales konsekvenser for de central- og østeuropæiske lande og EFTA.
Mr Vever on the comparison between the EU's single market and the American market and on the effects of this agreement on the CEEC and NAFTA.
Bruno Vevers rejse til Botswana, hvor han repræsenterede EØSU på mødet om "Fremme af forbrugerpolitik i Afrika".
The mission of Mr Vever to Botswana where he represented the EESC in the meeting on “Promoting consuming policy in Africa”.