natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Da sektionen allerede havde afholdt en generel debat om spørgsmålet på sidste møde, foreslog Thomas Etty at gennemgå dokumentet side for side.
As the section had already held a general discussion on the subject at its previous meeting, Mr Etty proposed opening the page-by-page discussion of the document.
Da sektionen den 1. februar 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end 5 stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
Since the section had adopted its opinion with less than 5 votes against on 1 February 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 10. april 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med 34 stemmer for og 2 imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with 34 votes to 2 on 10 April 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 10. april 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 10 April 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 10. maj 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 10 May 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 10. maj 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
Since the section had adopted its opinion on 10 May 2012 with no votes against, and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 10. november 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the Section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 10 November 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 10. november 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 10 November 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 11. maj 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 11 May 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 11. maj 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 11 May 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 11. maj 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 11 May 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 12. juni 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 12 June 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 13. marts 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the Section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 13 March 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 13. marts 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
Since the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 13 March 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 16. december 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end fem stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion on 16 December 2011 with fewer than five votes against, and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 17. april 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end fem stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with fewer than 5 votes against on 17 April 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 17. april 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end fem stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with less than five votes against on 17 April 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 17. april 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 17 April 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 19. december 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 19 December 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 2. februar 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med 57 stemmer for, 1 imod og 1 hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by 57 votes to 1, with 1 abstention on 2 February 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 2. februar 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the Section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 2 February 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 2. februar 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 2 February 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 2. oktober 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end 5 stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion on 2 October 2012 with less than 5 votes against and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)) of the EESC Rules of procedure.
Da sektionen den 20. december 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 20 December 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 21. december 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 21 December 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 21. november 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 21 November 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 22. marts 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 22 March 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 22. november 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med 60 stemmer for og 1 hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with 60 votes with 1 abstention on 22 November 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 22. november 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med 62 stemmer for og 1 hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with 62 votes and 1 abstention on 22 November 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 22. november 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 22 November 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 23. april 2013 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end 5 stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with less than five votes against on 23 April 2013 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 23. januar 2013 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 23 January 2013 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 23. januar 2013 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
Since the section had adopted its opinion on 23 January 2013 with no votes against, and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 23. juni 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end fem stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with less than five votes against on 23 June 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 23. juni 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 23 June 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 23. juni 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
Since the section had adopted its opinion on 23 June 2011 with no votes against and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 23. november 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med 1 stemme imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
Since the section had adopted its opinion with one vote against on 23 November 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 23. oktober 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 23 October 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 24. februar 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 24 February 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 24. maj 2011 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med 2 stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with 2 votes against on 24 May 2011 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 25. juni 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med 2 stemmer hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with 2 abstentions on 25 June 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 25. juni 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the Section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 25 June 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 25. marts 2013 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med 40 stemmer for og 1 hverken for eller imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion by 40 votes with one abstention on 25 March 2013 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 25. november 1999 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 43 E og 49, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion without any votes against on 25 November 1999 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion to an immediate vote (Rules 43(E) and 49(3)).
Da sektionen den 25. oktober 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 25 October 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 26. februar 2013 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse med mindre end 5 stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with less than five votes against on 26 February 2013 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Da sektionen den 26. juni 2012 havde vedtaget sin udtalelse uden stemmer imod, og da der ikke var indgivet ændringsforslag, besluttede forsamlingen enstemmigt at gå direkte over til afstemning (forretningsordenens artikel 50, stk. 4, og artikel 56, stk. 3).
As the section had adopted its opinion with no votes against on 26 June 2012 and no amendments had been tabled, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).