natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dana Štechová understregede i sit svar til Colddrick, at den af forretningsordensudvalget udarbejdede tekst åbnede op for både interne og eksterne kandidater som bekræftet af den juridiske tjeneste.
Ms Štechová replied that, as the legal service had confirmed, the text drawn up by the RP panel opened the door to internal and external candidates.
Dana Štechová understregede, at de foranstaltninger, der træffes for at støtte familierne samtidig kan føre til kvalitetsarbejdspladser med den passende finansiering.
Ms Štechová stressed that measures taken to support families could also lead to the creation of properly remunerated, good quality jobs.
Dana Štechová understregede, at EØSU's udtalelse kom på det rigtige tidspunkt og derfor kunne komme til at spille en vigtig rolle.
Ms Štechová stressed that the EESC opinion came at the right moment and could therefore play an important role.
Dana Štechová var af den opfattelse, at den eksisterende tekst var tilstrækkeligt klar, og at det ville være kontraproduktivt at nævne "aldersgrænser".
Ms Štechová believed that the existing paragraph is sufficiently clear and that it is counterproductive to mention "age limits".
Dana Štechová var bange for, at til trods for mange erklæringer og diskussioner havde de unges situation ikke ændret sig væsentligt.
Ms Štechová feared that despite many declarations and discussions, the situation of youth had not changed substantially.
Dana Štechová, Carlos Alberto Pereira Martins, Pirkko Raunemaa, Seamus Boland, Johannes Kleemann, Christa Schweng og Georgios Dassis samt Xavier Verboven tog ordet under den generelle debat.
Ms Štechová, Mr Pereira Martins, Ms Raunemaa, Mr Boland, Mr Kleemann, Ms Schweng and Mr Dassis and Mr Verboven spoke in the general discussion.
Dana Štechová, hovedordfører, tog herefter ordet for at minde om forretningsordensudvalgets mandat, årsagerne til dets beslutning om at foreslå en ændring af forretningsordenens artikel 72 og de praktiske konsekvenser heraf.
The panel's rapporteur-general, Ms Štechová, then took the floor to outline the mandate of the Rules of Procedure Panel, the reasons for the changes it had decided to propose to Rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure and the practical implications of the changes.
Dana Štechová, Teresa Costa Macedo og Nicole Prud'homme lykønskede ordføreren og kom ind på følgende punkter: uddannelsesmulighedernes betydning for imødegåelsen af frustration og oprørstrang hos unge, den forventet positive modtagelse af udtalelsen hos de uddannelsesansvarlige, følgerne af marginaliseringen på boligområdet, de ulige vilkår for adgang til velrenommerede uddannelsesinstitutioner og de positive følger af førskoleuddannelse i familien.
D. Štechová, T. Costa Macedo and N. Prud'homme congratulated the rapporteur on his work and drew attention to aspects such as: the role of education in preventing young people's feelings of frustration and rebelliousness; the hope that this paper would be well received by those working in education; the repercussions of housing segregation and unequal access to prestigious educational bodies; and the positive features of pre-school education in a family environment.
Danco, Berlin
Dr. Danco, Berlin
Dandea
Mr Dandea
DANDEA
PLOSCEANU
Dandea (RO)
Mr Dandea (RO)
Dandea (RO-II)
Dandea (II-RO)
Dandea (RO-II)
Mr Dandea (RO-II)
Dandea (RO-II)
Mr Dandea (RO–II)
Dandea (RO-II)
Mr Dandea Petru Sorin (RO-II)
Dandea (RO-II)
Petru Sorin Dandea (RO-II)
Dandea (RO-II)
Santillán (ES-II)
DANDEA Petru Sorin
Dandea, Petru Sorin
Danemark
5,798
Danemark
8,305
Danes (suppleant)
Danes (Alternate)
DANEV
FRERICHS
Danev
Mr Danev
Danev (art. 62 – Angelova)
DANEV (Rule 62 – Angelova)
DANEV (art. 62 – Behar)
DANEV (Rule 62 – Behar)
Danev (art. 62 – Bontea) (BG)
Mr Danev (Rule 62 – Bontea) (BG)
Danev (art. 62 – Roussenova)
DANEV (Rule 62 – Roussenova)
DANEV (artikel 62 – Bontea)
DANEV (rule 62 – Bontea)
Danev (BG – I)
Mr Danev (BG – I)
Danev (BG)
Mr Danev (BG)
Danev (BG-Gr.
Mr Danev (BG-I)
Danev (BG-I)
Bojidar Danev (BG-I)
Danev (BG-I)
Danev
Danev (BG-I)
Danev (BG  I)
Danev (BG-I)
I - BG)
Danev (BG-I)
I-BG)
Danev (BG-I)
Lopez Almendariz
Danev (BG-I)
Mr Danev (BG-I)
Danev (BG-I)
Mr Danev (BG–I)
Danev (BG-I)
Mr Danev (I–BG)
Danev (BG-I)
Rebolj
Danev (BG-I) (art. 62 - Roussenova)
Danev (BG-I) (Rule 62 – Roussenova)
Danev (BG-I) (art. 62 – Behar)
DANEV (BG-I) (Rule 62 – Behar)
Danev (BG-I) (art. 62 – Behar)
Mr Danev (BG-I) (Rule 62 – Behar)
Danev (BG-I) (art. 62 – Behar)
Mr Danev (BG-I) (Rule 62 – Mr Behar)
Danev (BG-I) (for Angelova – art. 62 FO)
Danev (BG-I) (Rule 62 – Ms Angelova)
Danev (BG-I) (for Angelova, art. 62)
Mr Danev (BG-I) (Ms Angelova, Rule 62)
Danev (BG–I)
Mr/Ms
Danev (Gr.
Mr Danev (Gr.
Danev (I-BG)
Mr Danev (I-BG)
Danev, Bojidar
Ardhe, Christian
Danev, Bojidar – art. 62
Danev, Bojidar – Rule 62
Daneš (Suppleant for Haken)
Daneš (alternate for Mr Haken)
Daneš Brzica   (ordfører for Gruppe III)
Mr Daneš Brzica (rapporteur for Group III)
Daneš Brzica (for Gruppe III)
Mr Daneš Brzica (for Group III)
Daniel Aucouturier
Mr Daniel Aucouturier
Daniel Aucouturier (for ordføreren)
Daniel Aucouturier (for the rapporteur)
Daniel Aucouturier (for ordføreren)
Mr Daniel Aucouturier  (for the rapporteur)
Daniel Aucouturier (for ordføreren)
Mr Daniel Aucouturier (for the rapporteur)
Daniel Bunch, GD ENTR
Daniel Bunch, DG ENTR
Daniel Cloquet (for Gruppe I)
Daniel Cloquet (for Group I)
Daniel Cloquet (for Gruppe I)
Mr Daniel Cloquet (for Group I)
Daniel DATTEE (for ordføreren)
Mr Daniel DATTÉE (for the Rapporteur)
Daniel De Norre
De Norre
Daniel De Norre
De Norre (Rule 53 - Gauder)
Daniel de Norre
Konitzer
Daniel De Norre
Mr de Norre
Daniel De Norre (fuldmagt fra Paul Verhaeghe)
De Norre (voting rights of Mr Verhaeghe)
Daniel De Norre (fuldmagt fra Paul Verhaeghe)
De Norre (voting rights of Verhaeghe)
Daniel De Norre (fuldmagt fra Verhaeghe)
De Norre (voting rights of Verhaeghe)
Daniel De Norre foreslog at erstatte sidste punktum ("For så vidt finder det Kommissionens forslag logisk.") med følgende:
Mr de Norre proposed that the last sentence ("In this respect ... consistent approach") be replaced by the following:
Daniel De Norre foreslog at erstatte sidste punktum med følgende:
Mr de Norre proposed that the last sentence be replaced by the following:
Daniel De Norre foreslog at lade dette punkt udgå.
Mr de Norre proposed the deletion of this point.
Daniel DE NORRE foreslog at slette 2. og 3. afsnit i punkt 3.2., der risikerer at skade retssikkerheden, da der foreslås en udvidelse af anvendelsesområdet.
Another amendment by Mr de Norre sought to delete the second and third paragraphs of point 3.2, which proposed expanding the field of application and hence could undermine legal certainty.
Daniel DE NORRE foreslog punktet slettet.
Mr de Norre proposed to delete this paragraph.
Daniel DE NORRE forslog at slette disse punkter.
Mr de Norre proposed to delete these points.
Daniel DE NORRE havde fremsat to ændringsforslag; han foreslog, at man under "generelle bemærkninger" tilføjede et nyt punkt om visse former for beskyttelse af selskaber mod fjendtlige operationer; han foreslog endvidere at ændre fristen for accept af tilbudet.
Mr de Norre had tabled two amendments with a view to adding, under "General comments", a paragraph on methods of protecting companies against hostile bids and amending the period for acceptance of a bid.
Daniel De Norre påpegede, at Kommissionen ikke havde gennemført den undersøgelse af direktivets anvendelighed på træstøv, som Rådet havde anmodet om.
Mr de Norre stressed that the Commission had not carried out the study requested by the Council into the Directive's applicability to wood dusts.
Daniel De Norre trak forslaget om at erstatte "5-7" med "6 og 7" tilbage.
Mr de Norre withdrew his proposal that "5 to 7" be replaced by "6 and 7".
Daniel de Norre var æresdirektør for Den Belgiske Industrisammenslutning (FEB).
Mr De Norre had been the honorary director of the Federation of Enterprises in Belgium.
Daniel De Norre, Aina Margareta Regnell, Uno Westerlund, Kenneth Walker, Daniel Giron og Renate Hornung-Draus deltog i den generelle debat med indlæg om behovet for en regelmæssig EUROPASS-evalueringsrapport, virksomhedernes - specielt de små og mellemstore virksomheders - potentielle rolle i tilfælde af forenklede ansøgningsprocedurer, lærlingeordningernes centrale stilling og hensynet til traktatens artikel 127.
Mr de Norre, Mrs Regnell, Mr Westerlund, Mr Walker, Mr Giron and Mrs Hornung-Draus spoke in the general debate on points concerning the need for a regular EUROPASS appraisal report, the potential role of enterprises - especially SMEs - with simple application procedures, the key role of apprenticeship schemes, and the need to respect Article 127 of the Treaty.
Daniel DE NORRE, der fra tid til anden havde ledet studiegruppen, roste ordføreren og hans kolleger for deres lydhørhed og for kvaliteten af deres arbejde.
Mr de Norre, who had at times chaired the study group, paid homage to the rapporteur and his colleagues for the quality and sensitivity of the work accomplished.
Daniel De Norre, der har indgivet alle ændringsforslag sammen med Filip Hamro‑Drotz, foreslog at tilføje følgende i slutningen af punktet:
Mr de Norre, whose amendments had all been tabled jointly with Mr Hamro-Drotz, proposed the insertion of a new paragraph as follows:
Daniel de NORRE, som havde deltaget i studiegruppens arbejde, fremhævede, at man på trods af  vanskelighederne havde fået udarbejdet en afbalanceret tekst af stor politisk rækkevidde.
Mr de Norre, a member of the study group, stressed that despite the difficulties, the Section had produced a balanced text with a wide political scope.
Daniel de Norre, tidligere medlem af EØSU (Gr.
Daniel De Norre, former Committee member (Gr.
Daniel Deak
Deak, Daniel
Daniel Debatisse (for ordføreren)
Mr Daniel Debatisse (for the rapporteur)
Daniel Debatisse (ordførerens ekspert)
Daniel Debatisse (for the rapporteur)
Daniel Flore, Conseiller général - B
M. Daniel Flore, Conseiller général - B
Daniel Giron
Giron
Daniel Giron
Lehti
Daniel Giron
Mr Giron
Daniel Giron
Wilms
Daniel Giron (art. 54 - Dario Mengozzi)
Mr Giron (Rule 54 - Mr Mengozzi)
Daniel Giron (art. 54 - Jean-Paul Bastian)
Mr Giron (Rule 54 - Mr Bastian)
Daniel Giron (art. 54 - Kris Peeters) (F-III)
Mr Giron (Rule 54 - Mr Peeters) (F-III)
Daniel Giron (art. 54 - Leif E. Nielsen)
Mr  Giron (Rule 54 - Nielsen)
Daniel Giron (art. 54 - Roger Burnel)
Mr Giron (Rule 54 - Mr Burnel)
Daniel Giron (F - III) (art. 54 - Flavio Pasotti)
Mr Giron (F-III) (Rule 54 - Mr Pasotti)
Daniel Giron (F-III)
Giron (F-III)
Daniel Giron (F-III)
Mr Giron (F-III)
Daniel Giron (F-III)
Mr Giron (F-III)
Daniel Giron (F-III) (art. 54 - Flavio Pasotti)
Mr Giron (Rule 54 - Mr Pasotti) (F-III)
Daniel Giron (for Etienne de Paul de Barchifontaine, art. 54) - III
Mr Giron (Rule 54 for Mr de Paul de Barchifontaine) - III
Daniel Giron (fuldmagt fra Christina Lundh)
Giron (voting rights of Lundh)
Daniel Giron (fuldmagt fra Nikolaos Vassilaras)
Giron (proxy for Vassilaras)
Daniel Giron (Gr.
D. Giron (Gr.
Daniel Giron (III-F)
Mr Giron (III-F)
Daniel Giron anså det for ulogisk, at man på den ene side roser kvaliteten af ØSU's udtalelser og på  den anden begrænser dets budget.
Mr Giron felt that it was illogical on the one hand to praise the quality of ESC opinions and on the other hand to cut its budget.
Daniel Giron foreslog sidst i punktet at tilføje følgende afsnit:
Mr Giron proposed adding the following new paragraph:
Daniel Giron godkendte ligeledes forslagene, som lå helt på linje med de hidtidige overvejelser.
Mr Giron also welcomed the proposals which were fully in line with previous discussions.
Daniel Giron kom ind på socialøkonomien set i forhold til de privatøkonomiske små og mellemstore virksomheder.
Mr Giron looked at the social economy in relation to private-sector SMEs.
Daniel Giron kom ind på spørgsmålet om forskud.
Mr Giron brought up the matter of cash advances.
Daniel Giron mente ligeledes, at sektionerne burde være rimelige på dette område.
Mr Giron too felt that the sections should show restraint in this area.
Daniel Giron mente, at det skulle præciseres i formandens brev til de andre institutioner om ØSU's godkendelse af aftalen, at OLAF skal respektere såvel medlemmernes mandatvilkår som traktaterne.
Mr Giron felt that the president's letter to the other institutions giving notice of the ESC's agreement should specify that OLAF's activities should respect the members' Statute and the Treaties.
Daniel Giron mente, at Europa-Parlamentet ikke respekterede ØSU tilstrækkeligt, hverken som institution, eller hvad dets individuelle medlemmer angik.
Mr Giron thought the European Parliament did not sufficiently respect either the Committee as an institution or its members.
Daniel Giron og Manuel Ataíde Ferreira påpegede, at det især var den manglende mødedeltagelse i studiegrupperne, som skabte problemerne i forbindelse med de budgetmæssige overslag.
Mr Giron and Mr Ataíde Ferreira said that absenteeism at study groups would create particular difficulties for budgetary forecasting.
Daniel Giron plæderede for at anvende euro i figurer og tabeller.
Mr Giron wanted the figures in tables to be presented in euros.
Daniel Giron rejste spørgsmålet om de fremtidige kvæstorer og deres eventuelle godtgørelser.
Mr Giron raised the issue of the future quaestors and possible allowances for them.
Daniel Giron sagde, at han var indforstået med en omformulering af ændringsforslaget, når blot hovedindholdet blev bevaret.
Mr Giron said that he would accept a rewording of this amendment provided that its thrust was preserved.
Daniel Giron spurgte, om medlemmer, der allerede har en løbende konto, hvortil godtgørelsen af deres rejse- og opholdsudgifter overføres, ligeledes bør udfylde den vedlagte blanket.
Mr Giron asked if members who already had their expenses and allowances paid into a current account were also required to complete the form appended to the letter.
Daniel Giron støttede dette forslag.
Mr Giron supported this position.
Daniel Giron ønskede nærmere oplysninger om Den Fælles Tolketjeneste, dens arbejdsmetoder og forholdet mellem Den Fælles Tolketjeneste og ØSU.
Mr Giron requested further information on the SCIC, its working methods and its relations with the Committee.
Daniel Giron ønskede, at man i forslaget ligeledes afsætter et beløb til de kvæstorer, der skal indsættes.
Mr Giron asked that the proposed allocation should provide for funds for the Quaestors who were to be appointed.
Daniel Giron, Colin Lustenhouwer og Henri Malosse foreslog, at der efter punkt 3.1 blev tilføjet følgende nye punkt:
Mr Giron, Mr Lustenhouwer and Mr Malosse proposed adding a new point 3.2 reading as follows:
Daniel Giron, Colin Lustenhouwer og Henri Malosse foreslog, at der efter punkt 3.4 blev tilføjet et nyt punkt 3.4.1:
Mr Giron, Mr Lustenhouwer and Mr Malosse proposed adding a new point 3.4.1 reading as follows:
Daniel Giron, Colin Lustenhouwer og Henri Malosse foreslog, at der efter punkt 3.9 blev tilføjet et nyt punkt:
Mr Giron, Mr Lustenhouwer and Mr Malosse proposed adding the following new point after point 3.9:
Daniel Giron, Colin Lustenhouwer og Henri Malosse foreslog, at der i punkt 3.10, Linje A, punkt 2, efter første led blev indføjet et nyt led med følgende ordlyd:
Mr Giron, Mr Lustenhouwer and Mr Malosse proposed adding the following new indent in point 3.10 (Strand A):
Daniel Giron, Colin Lustenhouwer og Henri Malosse foreslog, at følgende punktum skulle tilføjes i slutningen af punkt 2.5:
Mr Giron, Mr Lustenhouwer and Mr Malosse proposed adding the following at the end of 2.5:
Daniel Giron, Colin Lustenhouwer og Henri Malosse foreslog, at ordene "arbejdsmarkedets parter" i punkt 2.2 blev ændret til: "arbejdsmarkedet og erhvervslivet".
Mr Giron, Mr Lustenhouwer and Mr Malosse proposed replacing the words "social partners" in 2.2 by "economic and social partners".
Daniel Giron/Henri Malosse
Giron/Malosse
Daniel Girons ændringsforslag fandt han alt i alt udmærket, men første del var noget vag.
He regarded the amendment tabled by Mr Giron as partly satisfactory , though the first part was rather vague.
Daniel Guiraud
Daniel Guiraud (for the rapporteur)
Daniel Guiraud
Mr Daniel Guiraud
Daniel Guiraud (for Gruppe I)
(for Group I)
Daniel Guiraud (for Gruppe I)
Mr Daniel Guiraud (for Group I)
Daniel GUIRAUD (for Gruppe I)
Mr Daniel Guiraud (for Group I)
Daniel GUIRAUD (for ordføreren)
Daniel Guiraud (for the rapporteur)
Daniel GUIRAUD (for ordføreren)
Mr Daniel Guiraud (for the rapporteur)
Daniel Kraus
Mr Daniel Kraus
Daniel Le Scornet
Le Scornet
Daniel Le Scornet
Mr Le Scornet
Daniel Le Scornet  accepterede kompromisforslaget.
Mr Le Scornet accepted the proposed compromise.
Daniel Le Scornet  forslog at ændre formuleringen af overskriften ved at slette ordet ”organisée” i den franske version (vedrører ikke den danske version).
Mr Le Scornet proposed to amend the title of the point by deleting the word "organised".
Daniel Le Scornet (F - III)
Mr Le Scornet (F-III)
Daniel Le Scornet (for Strasser, art. 62)  (FR-III)
Mr Le Scornet (Rule 62 Mr Strasser) (FR-III)
Daniel Le Scornet (FR-III)
Le Scornet (FR-III)
Daniel Le Scornet (FR-III)
Mr Le Scornet (FR - III)
Daniel Le Scornet (FR-III)
Mr Le Scornet (FR-III)
Daniel Le Scornet (FR-III)
Mr Le Scornet (FR/III)
Daniel Le Scornet (Gr.
Mr Le Scornet (Gr.
Daniel Le Scornet erkendte, at man ikke konstant bør kritisere Rusland, men man skal heller ikke give de russiske myndigheder carte blanche.
Mr Le Scornet acknowledged that although Russia should not be constantly criticised, carte blanche should not be given to the Russian authorities.
Daniel Le Scornet foreslog at erstatte sidste sætning med:
Mr Le Scornet proposed that the last sentence be replaced as follows:
Daniel Le Scornet foreslog at tilføje følgende sætning efter tredje punktum:
Mr Le Scornet proposed that the following text be added after the third sentence:
Daniel Le Scornet foreslog følgende ændring:
Mr Le Scornet proposed the following amendment:
Daniel Le Scornet foreslog, at man fjernede følgende formulering fra sidste del af anden halvdel.
Mr Le Scornet proposed deleting the following at the end of the second paragraph:
Daniel Le Scornet foreslog, at sidste led stryges:
Mr Le Scornet proposed deleting the final section:
Daniel Le Scornet forklarede, at man ikke burde opstille prioriteringer, da de kunne ændres.
Mr Le Scornet explained that priorities should not be set, because they were subject to change.
Daniel Le Scornet fortalte om sin studietur til Tyrkiet.
Mr Le Scornet reported on his working visit to Turkey.
Daniel Le Scornet orienterede medlemmerne om præsidie-ad-hoc gruppens arbejde med Kommissionens beslutning om tilbagetrækning af forslag, bl.a. forslaget om en europæisk statut for foreninger.
Mr Le Scornet informed members on the work of the Bureau ad hoc group regarding the Commission's decision to withdraw proposals, inter-alia, on the European Statute for associations.
Daniel Le Scornet præsenterede forslaget:
Mr Le Scornet presented the amendment:
Daniel Le Scornet præsenterede ændringsforslaget.
Mr Le Scornet presented the proposed amendment.
Daniel Le Scornet præsenterede ændringsforslaget.
Mr Scornet presented the amendment.
Daniel Le Scornet præsenterede ændringsforslaget:
Mr Le Scornet presented the amendment:
Daniel Le Scornet støttede udtalelsen og forklarede, at formålet med hans ændringer var at bidrage med visse nuancer samt understrege betydningen af de kulturelle forandringer, der var nødvendige for at opnå bæredygtig udvikling.
Mr Le Scornet supported the opinion and explained that his amendments were intended to contribute certain nuances as well as to underline the importance of the cultural shift needed to achieve sustainable development.
Daniel Le Scornet takkede ordføreren og støttede navnlig den europæiske statut for henholdsvis foreninger og gensidige selskaber, ligesom han mindede medlemmerne om det tilsagn, der allerede var afgivet om at arrangere et symposium om unionsborgerskab.
Mr Le Scornet congratulated the rapporteur, expressed particular support for the European Statute for associations and mutual societies, and reminded members of the commitment already made to organise a citizenship symposium.
Daniel Le Scornet tilføjede, at Tyrkiet skal bedømmes objektivt.
Mr Le Scornet added that Turkey has to be assessed in an objective manner.
Daniel Le Scornet trak dette ændringsforslag tilbage.
Mr Le Scornet withdrew the amendment.
Daniel Le Scornet trak ændringsforslaget tilbage.
Mr Le Scornet withdrew the amendment.
Daniel Le Scornet understregede, at anvendelsen af andre kriterier over for Tyrkiet end over for de øvrige lande ville ryste samfundet.
Mr Le Scornet emphasised the social conflict which would be caused by the adoption of different criteria for Turkey than for other countries.
Daniel le Scornet understregede, at der i EU var behov for mere information om Tyrkiet og omvendt, idet der fortsat fandtes for mange fordomme og stereotyper.
Mr Le Scornet highlighted the need to have more information on Turkey in the EU and the other way round, as there are still too many prejudices and stereotypes.
Daniel Le Scornet ønskede at omformulere punktet:
Mr Le Scornet wished to amend the point as follows:
Daniel Le Scornet, Art.
Le Scornet
Daniel le Scornet, Christina Wahrolin, Wilfried Beirnaert, Maud Jansson, Sukhdev Sharma, Christa Schweng og Miguel Angel Cabra De Luna deltog i den generelle debat.
Mr Le Scornet, Mrs Wahrolin, Mr Beirnaert, Mrs Jansson, Mr Sharma, Mrs Schweng and Mr Cabra de Luna spoke in the general debate.
Daniel Le Scornet, Friedrich Dinkhauser, Christer Jansson, Emile van Velsen, Frank Stöhr, Francesco Petringa, Wolfgang Greif og Jacques Voisin deltog i den generelle debat.
Mr Le Scornet, Mr Dinkhauser, Mrs Jansson, Mr van Velsen, Mr Stöhr, Mr Petringa,  Mr Greif and Mr Voisin spoke in the ensuing general discussion.
Daniel Le Scornet, Gustav Zöhrer, Christer Jansson, Adrien Bedossa, José Correia, Maurizio Angelo, Wolfgang Greif og Wilfried Beirnaert deltog i den generelle debat.
Mr Le Scornet, Mr Zöhrer, Ms Jansson, Mr Bedossa, Mr Correia, Mr Angelo, Mr Greif and MrBeirnaert took part in the general discussion.
Daniel Le Scornet, Laure Batut, Jorge Pegado Liz, hr. Tremblay og Kommissionen deltog i debatten om etsprogedes rettigheder, flersprogethed og borgerskab, kulturel mangfoldighed og bilaget til udtalelsen om Forslag til Charter om Flersprogethed.
Mr Le Scornet, Ms Batut, Mr Pegado Liz, Mr Tremblay and the Commission spoke in the debate about the rights of mono-linguists, multilingualism and citizenship, multiculturalism and the annex to the opinion concerning the Draft Charter on Plurilingualism.
Daniel Le Scornet, Leila Kurki, David Sears, Maureen O'Neill, Ursula Engelen-Kefer, Ingrid Jerneck, Christa Schweng, Wolfgang Greif, Christer Jansson og Marzena Mendza‑Drozd deltog i den generelle debat, hvor de kom ind på spørgsmål vedrørende demokrati og folkesundhed, solidaritet generationerne imellem, mobilitet og tværfaglighed, det stadig svage traktatgrundlag for folkesundhed, kvalitetsbehandling og sundhedskonsekvensvurderinger, supplerende aspekter af offentlig sundhedsbehandling og sundhed på arbejdspladsen samt forebyggende tjenester, behovet for saglig oplysning og kommunikationskanaler, behovet for bedre databaser vedrørende patientmobilitet, mulighederne for kvalitetsjob inden for fremtidige sundhedstjenester, anvendelse af strukturfonde til at støtte sundhedsbeskyttelse i mindre udviklede områder.
Mr Le Scornet, Mrs Kurki, Mr Sears, Mrs O'Neill, Mrs Engelen-Kefer, Mrs Jerneck, Mrs Schweng, Mr Greif, Mrs Jansson and Mrs Mendza-Drozd spoke in the joint general discussion, raising points concerning health, democracy, inter-generational solidarity, mobility and multi-professionalism, the Treaty base for public health which is still weak, quality treatment and health impact assessments, the complementary aspects of public and occupational health care and preventive services, the need for proper information and communication channels, the need for better data bases concerning patient mobility, the quality job potential of emerging health care services, the use of structural funds in helping to sustain health care in deprived regions.
Daniel Mareels (Arbejdsgivergruppen – BE)
Daniel Mareels (Employers – BE)