natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der blev hovedsageligt konstateret følgende mangler: mangler ved de administrative kontroller vedrørende støtteberettigelse og forpligtelser, f.eks. manglende afsløring af ikke-støtteberettigede momsudgifter eller dobbeltfinansieringer, svagheder i evalueringen af, om udgifterne er rimelige (Tyskland (Brandenburg og Berlin), Polen, Rumænien og Sverige), mangler i anvendelsen af reduktioner eller inddrivelser, mangler i udformningen og gennemførelsen af systemet til kontrol af krydsoverensstemmelse, utilstrækkelige GAEC-standarder eller ukorrekt gennemførelse af nitratdirektivet.
Is worried about the high financial indicators for opening an investigation included in the Investigative Policy Priorities of OLAF for the years 2012 and 2013 that are in the customs sector: EUR 1 million, in the agriculture sectors: EUR 100000 for Sapard and above EUR 250000 for agriculture; in the structural funds: EUR 500000 in the European Social Fund as well as in the Cohesion Fund and EUR 1 million in ERDF, in the external aid and centralised expenditure sectors: EUR 50000 and also in the Union staff sector: EUR 10000; criticises that it is in the responsibility of the managing DGs to care about possible fraud cases below these financial indicators without having qualified staff at their disposal; sees taxpayers money and the financial interest of the Union endangered;
Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1290/2005 af 21. juni 2005 om finansiering af den fælles landbrugspolitik (EUT L 209 af 11.8.2005, s. 1).
Notes that it has not received eight months after the adoption of Parliament’s resolution [42] on the protection of the financial interest 2011 in plenary, the legal analysis of the legality of recordings of private phone conversations during administrative investigations concerning members of the Union institutions and Union officials conducted by OLAF requested in paragraph 75 of that resolution;
EUT L 308 af 16.11.2013, s. 27.
Is deeply concerned about the findings of the Supervisory Committee that OLAF has not established a prior legality check for investigative measures other than those specifically listed in OLAF’s Instructions to Staff on Investigative Procedures (ISIP); notes that this endangers respect for the fundamental rights of, and procedural guarantees relating to, the persons concerned;
Den nøjagtige beskrivelse af den enkelte foranstaltning under den fælles landbrugspolitik for de hoved- og støttekontroller og det niveau af faste korrektioner, som skal anvendes på hver situation, der hidrører fra kriterierne i bilaget, bør fastsættes i Kommissionens retningslinjer baseret på de eksisterende retningslinjer, som er solidt forankret og har givet Kommissionen mulighed for at opnå positive kendelser fra EU-Domstolen i de fleste af de sager, der bestrides af medlemsstaterne.
Notes that breaches of essential procedural requirements during preparatory investigations could affect the legality of the final decision taken on the basis of investigations by OLAF; assesses this as potentially high-risk, since breaches would thus incur the legal liability of the Commission;
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 1303/2013 af 17. december 2013 om fælles bestemmelser for Den Europæiske Fond for Regionaludvikling, Den Europæiske Socialfond, Samhørighedsfonden, Den Europæiske Landbrugsfond for Udvikling af Landdistrikterne og Den Europæiske Hav- og Fiskerifond og om generelle bestemmelser for Den Europæiske Fond for Regionaludvikling, Den Europæiske Socialfond, Samhørighedsfonden og Den Europæiske Hav- og Fiskerifond og om ophævelse af Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1083/2006 (EUT L 347 af 20.12.2013, s. 320).
Deems the direct participation of OLAF’s Director-General in some investigative tasks, inter alia, interviews of witnesses, unacceptable; points out that the Director-General could be faced with a conflict of interest, since, under Article 90(a) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and Article 23(1) of the ISIP he is the authority who receives complaints against OLAF’s investigations and decides whether or not appropriate action is taken with regard to any failure to respect procedural guarantees;
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 1301/2013 af 17. december 2013 om Den Europæiske Fond for Regionaludvikling og om særlige bestemmelser vedrørende målet om investeringer i vækst og beskæftigelse og om ophævelse af forordning (EF) nr. 1080/2006 (EUT L 347 af 20.12.2013, s. 289).
Notes with concern the large number of suspected fraud cases which the Commission has reported to OLAF but which OLAF dismissed and referred back to the Commission; observes that no record is kept of the follow-up measures taken by the Commission; calls on OLAF at least to monitor the follow-up measures to these cases; calls for an analysis of the suspected fraud cases dismissed and referred back to the Commission in 2012 and 2013;
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1080/2006 af 5. juli 2006 om Den Europæiske Fond for Regionaludvikling og om ophævelse af forordning (EF) nr. 1783/1999 (EUT L 210 af 31.7.2006, s. 1).
Is alarmed by the results of two surveys among OLAF staff and the shortcomings which have become apparent in the functioning of OLAF since the reorganisations; calls on the Court of Auditors to perform a follow-up audit and to follow up its Special Report 2/2011 in order to investigate the impact of the reorganisation;
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 1304/2013 af 17. december 2013 om Den Europæiske Socialfond og om ophævelse af Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1081/2006(EUT L 347 af 20.12.2013, s. 470).
Requests that the Commission provide the Committee on Budgetary Control with a non-redacted version of the document D/000955 from the 5 February 2009 produced by OLAF on the misuse of Union funds by a high-ranking member of a Union institution;
EMPL H1/JJ/DV vgk (2013) af 13.11.2013.
Expects to be informed by the Commission about all Clearing House meetings in 2012 and 2013 in regard to the participants at these meetings and the agendas; is worried about the independence of OLAF and requests that the Supervisory Committee analyse how far the Clearing House meetings endanger the independence of OLAF;
Arbejdsdokument fra Kommissionens tjenestegrene: SWD(2013) 307 vedføjet årsrapporten for 2013 om gennemførelsen af Den Europæiske Unions politikker for udvikling og ekstern bistand i 2012 (jf. s. 161).
Tobacco smuggling
Vedtagne tekster, P7_TA(2014)0288 (se side 69 i denne EUT), henstillinger i del XVI.
Calls for an assessment of the existing agreements with the four tobacco groups (Philip Morris International Corporation Inc.
Aktivitetsrapport for 2012 fra GD for Forskning og Innovation, s. 45 og følgende.
(PMI), Japan Tobacco International Corporation, British American Tobacco Corporation and Imperial Tobacco Corporation), taking into account the new Directive on Tobacco Products [43], the ratification of the Protocol to the FCTC Convention [44] and Parliament’s view on the issue of whether and, if appropriate, how the tobacco cooperation agreement with PMI is to be extended;
Vedtagne tekster, 3. juli 2013, P7_TA(2013)0318.
Calls for decisive measures by OLAF to combat cigarette smuggling: liaison units with China, the United Arab Emirates and Ukraine and at the appropriate places where smuggling is concentrated, as well as at Europol, in order to improve cooperation; stresses the importance of access to information and relevant databases in this connection;
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2014/40/EU af 3. april 2014 om indbyrdes tilnærmelse af medlemsstaternes love og administrative bestemmelser om fremstilling, præsentation og salg af tobak og relaterede produkter og om ophævelse af direktiv 2001/37/EF (EUT L 127 af 29.4.2014, s. 1).
Calls on the Commission to describe what measures need to be taken in the Union to control the market for tobacco leaves, cut raw tobacco and mechanical equipment for the production of cigarettes, in order to combat illegal cigarette factories;
WHO's rammekonvention om tobakskontrol.
Absence of progress in Bulgaria
Punkt 1, litra af), i beslutningen af 17.4.2013 (EUT L 308 af 16.11.2013, s. 27).
Welcomes the clear statements by the Commission in the progress report of 22 January 2014 on developments in Bulgaria; is very concerned about the lack of progress under the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, which is now seven years old, and about the persistently high prevalence of corruption and the general difficulty observed there in assigning responsibilities and correcting errors; calls on the Commission to adopt a resolute attitude towards Bulgaria and to seriously examine whether it is even possible for Union funds to be deployed in accordance with the rules in such an environment;
Kommissionens meddelelse med titlen »Anvendelse af finansielle nettokorrektioner over for medlemsstater i forbindelse med landbrugspolitikken og samhørighedspolitikken« [11]9. glæder sig over, at Kommissionen som svar på skrivelsen fra Parlamentets medlemmer offentliggjorde denne meddelelse allerede i december 2013;
Slow progress in Romania
Den 26. januar 2005 præsenterede Barroso forelagde Parlamentet Kommissionens strategiske mål for 2005-2009.
Welcomes the findings in the Commission’s progress report of 22 January 2014 on developments in Romania; is very concerned about the slow progress made by Romania under the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism; draws attention to proposals to amend the Penal Code on issues regarding conflicts of interest for locally elected office-holders and an amnesty for Members of Parliament guilty of corruption; considers that it is hardly possible, in the light of this development, to deploy Union funds in accordance with the rules in such an environment;
En af prioriteterne for femårsperioden var, at Kommissionens »ansvarlighed bør forstærkes ved at tilstræbe en positiv revisionserklæring fra Den Europæiske Revisionsret«, (KOM(2005) 12, s. 6).
Roma
om Den Europæiske Revisionsrets særberetninger i forbindelse med decharge for 2012 for Kommissionen
Observes that the Commission is fundamentally unable to make any statements about measures funded by the EU budget to promote the integration of Roma people in their home countries; is critical of the fact that, despite the Roma Strategy of 2010, the Commission has not sought any way of demonstrating how measures have been taken for the benefit of Roma people; criticises the inadequate gathering of data by the Commission in the ESF, which does not make it possible to show Union citizens and tax-payers what has been achieved in terms of integration of Roma people drawing on ESF and Structural Fund appropriations; reminds the Commission that it has a duty to account for the use of Union tax revenue for the benefit of Roma people;
der henviser til Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 2012 [1],der henviser til det konsoliderede årsregnskab for Den Europæiske Union for regnskabsåret 2012 (COM(2013) 570 — C7-0237/2013) [2],der henviser til Revisionsrettens årsberetning om budgetgennemførelsen i regnskabsåret 2012 med institutionernes svar [3] og til Revisionsrettens særberetninger,der henviser til Revisionsrettens erklæring [4] om regnskabernes rigtighed og de underliggende transaktioners lovlighed og formelle rigtighed for regnskabsåret 2012, jf. artikel 287 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde,der henviser til sin afgørelse af 3. april 2014 om decharge for gennemførelsen af Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 2012, Sektion III — Kommissionen [5] og til sin beslutning med bemærkninger, der udgør en integrerende del af afgørelsen,
Notes an increase in complaints by civil-society organisations whose operations at least partially concern the Roma and which are denied access to Union funding because of an excess of red tape; calls on the Commission to support these organisations more in the overall process;
der henviser til Revisionsrettens særberetninger, der er udarbejdet i henhold til artikel 287, stk. 4, andet afsnit i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde,
IT policies
der henviser til Rådets henstillinger af 18. februar 2014 om meddelelse af decharge til Kommissionen for gennemførelsen af Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 2012 (05848/2014 — C7-0048/2014),
Calls on the Commission to explore open source, well-audited solutions for e-mail and calendaring, including end-user software; reminds the Commission that also other parts of the stack not normally visible to end-users such as firewalls, web servers etc. can be considered from an open source, secure perspective if a public tender relies on functional specifications rather than brand-name products;
der henviser til artikel 317, 318 og 319 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde samt Euratomtraktatens artikel 106 A,
Is concerned with the situation of effective captivity of the Union institutions with specific software-vendors; deplores that the Commission despite this realisation has made no steps in 2012 towards preparing open, public tenders for ICT, based on transparent criteria and functional specifications rather than brand-names;
der henviser til Rådets forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 1605/2002 af 25. juni 2002 om finansforordningen vedrørende De Europæiske Fællesskabers almindelige budget [6], særlig artikel 55, 145, 146 og 147,der henviser til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU, Euratom) nr. 966/2012 af 25. oktober 2012 om de finansielle regler vedrørende Unionens almindelige budget og om ophævelse af Rådets forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 1605/2002 [7], særlig artikel 62, 164, 165 og 166,der henviser til sine tidligere dechargeafgørelser og -beslutninger,
Recalls that the size of the SACHA II contract, and the full set of specific brand name products defined therein, was so large that only a very small number of contractors (two) could participate in the open, public tender; urges the Commission to prepare smaller open, public tenders to enable more actors to participate in such procurement and with a larger diversity of offers;
der henviser til forretningsordenens artikel 76 og bilag VI,
Urges the Commission to ensure that any consolidation endeavours in the ICT architecture goes towards well-accepted, open standards that are used by multiple vendors and which can be implemented by open source software; recalls that it is easier to ensure that e-mail storage on the premises is not accessed by foreign interests because of its geographical location;
der henviser til betænkning fra Budgetkontroludvalget (A7-0222/2014),
Studies and advice/consultation from external providers
A. der henviser til, at Kommissionen i henhold til artikel 17, stk. 1, i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union gennemfører budgettet og forvalter programmerne, og at den i henhold til artikel 317 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde gennemfører budgettet på eget ansvar i samarbejde med medlemsstaterne i overensstemmelse med princippet om forsvarlig økonomisk forvaltning;
Notes that the Commission was not able to provide Parliament with a clear, concise list in a machine readable format from the Commissions ABAC system such as an Excel table or a CSV file that includes the topics of all studies as well as the specific issue of any external advice/consultation carried out for the Commission by external providers with the names of these providers as well as the country where the respective provider has its seat while also indicating the date the authorising officers committed the budget appropriations for the studies or the external advice broken down by years starting in 2009 ending 2013; expects that list to be submitted to the Committee on Budgetary Control until 1 May 2014;
B. der henviser til, at Revisionsrettens særberetninger giver oplysninger om problematiske spørgsmål i forbindelse med afholdelsen af udgifter og derfor er nyttige for Parlamentet i dets udførelse af rollen som dechargemyndighed;
Getting results from the EU budget
C. der henviser til, at dets bemærkninger til Revisionsrettens særberetninger udgør en integrerende del af Parlamentets ovennævnte afgørelse af 3. april 2014 om decharge for gennemførelsen af Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 2012, Sektion III — Kommissionen;
Management plans and annual activity reports
Del I
Notes that the objectives stated in Article 38(3)(e) of the Financial Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 which should be measured by indicators are to a large extent used by the directors-general as objectives in their management plans, and points out that the directors-general should report in their annual activity reports on the results achieved and the extent to which the results have had the impact intended;
glæder sig over Revisionsrettens særberetning om målretning af støtten til modernisering af landbrugsbedrifter og glæder sig principielt over dens anbefalinger;
Shares the criticism expressed by the Court of Auditors (Annual Report for 2012, point 10.9) that the objectives taken directly from high-level policy or legislative documents are often not sufficiently focused and are therefore not useful for management plans and annual activity reports;
minder om, at foranstaltning 121, som støtter investeringsprojekter til modernisering af landbrugsbedrifter, beløber sig til 11,1 mia. EUR, som afholdes over Den Europæiske Landbrugsfond for Udvikling af Landdistrikterne (ELFUL) (finansielle data pr. januar 2012, inklusive 630 mio. EUR fra sundhedstjekket og EERP), hvilket svarer til ca. 11 % af EU's samlede planlagte udgifter til udvikling af landdistrikterne i EU; noterer sig, at alle medlemsstaterne har valgt at bruge foranstaltning 121;
Insists on the fact that those ‘objectives taken from high-level policy documents’ often relate to policies not fully under the responsibility of the Union; therefore calls on the directors-general to define objectives corresponding strictly to the competences of the Union and according fully with the principle of subsidiarity;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at forbedre den fælles overvågnings- og evalueringsramme (CMEF) med henblik på at skabe et effektivt redskab for medlemsstaterne og Kommissionen, som genererer relevante data til brug for overvågning af de resultater, der er opnået med de midler, der er anvendt til foranstaltning 121; insisterer på nødvendigheden af at udvikle pålidelige indikatorer, som skal gøre det muligt at foretage sammenligninger mellem medlemsstaterne (og/eller regionerne) og overvåge fremskridt med hensyn til opfyldelsen af Unionens prioriterede mål;
Regrets that evaluations have not been a useful source of evidence to substantiate reporting on policy achievements in the annual activity reports and that this is largely due to the fact that evaluations are oriented towards operational questions rather than performance or because the Commission has doubts as to the quality of information obtained from Member States’ authorities;
mener, at medlemsstaterne skal have et fælles system til overvågning og vurdering med henblik på at sikre, at Kommissionen har mulighed for at analysere omfanget af fremskridt, opfyldelsen af de definerede målsætninger, konsekvenserne heraf samt effektiviteten på EU-plan;
TFEU Article 318 evaluation report
mener, at der i de forskellige områder bør være en vis grad af homogenitet i anvendelsen af støtte til modernisering af landbrugsbedrifter, og at det derfor er nødvendigt at undgå en spredning på områderne for regulering, anvendelse og budgettering, og for at sikre, at medlemsstaterne gennemfører foranstaltningen ensartet;
Regrets the fact that, instead of focusing on the achievement of the Union’s main objectives, the Commission provided a range of evaluation summaries covering European Union programmes in all policy areas of expenditure under the Multiannual Financial Framework 2007-2013 and in accordance with the budget headings;
understreger betydningen af at styrke de strukturelle foranstaltninger på landbrugsbedrifterne, navnlig de foranstaltninger der tager sigte på modernisering, hvilket er afgørende for at opnå øget effektivitet og konkurrenceevne; mener i denne forbindelse, at det er nødvendigt at stille tilstrækkelig finansiering til rådighed i betragtning af det nuværende væsentlige underskud og under hensyntagen til den kontekst, som er karakteriseret ved en stærk konkurrenceevne i EU-landbruget og en gradvis liberalisering af verdensmarkederne og verdenshandelen;
Recalls that on 17 April 2013 Parliament urged the Commission to modify the structure of the Article 318 evaluation report ‘distinguishing the internal polices from the external ones and focussing within the section relating to internal policies on the Europe 2020 strategy, placing the emphasis on the progress made in the achievement of the flagships initiatives’ [45];
bemærker, at to af de 10 undersøgte LDP'er indeholdt klare beviser for god målretning af foranstaltning 121 (Italien (Veneto) og Ungarn); noterer sig, at seks andre LDP'er ikke indeholdt noget bevis for målretning (Belgien (Vallonien), Tyskland (Baden-Württemberg), Spanien (Catalonien), Frankrig, Rumænien (14) og Portugal); bemærker, at to LDP'er (Luxembourg og Polen) ikke indeholdt tilstrækkeligt bevis for, at foranstaltning 121 var blevet målrettet; noterer sig, at alle 10 LDP'er imidlertid blev godkendt af Kommissionen;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission plans to improve performance reporting in the annual activity reports of its directorates-general, to make a closer link between the annual management plans and annual activity reports on the one hand and the Article 318 evaluation report on the other hand and to adopt the evaluation report in parallel with the synthesis report;
noterer sig, at Kommissionen for så vidt angår den næste programmeringsperiode har foreslået, at kun udgifter, som er afholdt, efter at ansøgningen om støtte er blevet godkendt af den kompetente myndighed, skal være støtteberettigede;
Welcomes the Commission’s intention of drawing up and organising its evaluation report in accordance with the new performance framework established by the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020; stresses once again, however, that such a performance framework should encompass the following three main elements: achievement of the programme objectives (results), sound programme management by the Commission and the Member States and how programme results and sound management contribute to the Union’s main objectives;
mener, at det under hensyntagen til kompleksiteten og mangfoldigheden i de forskellige landbrugsstrukturer i Unionen er nødvendigt at opretholde en specifik støtte til modernisering af associative driftsformer i landbruget, da der foreligger objektivt påviselige kendsgerninger for, at dette kan løse problemer i forbindelse med bedrifter, som ikke har en tilstrækkelig størrelse til at være økonomisk bæredygtige og/eller problemer i forbindelse med generationsskifte;
Recalls that in order to ensure the sound financial management of Union funds, the Commission administers the Central Exclusion Database–a database of entities excluded from Union funding for reasons such as insolvency, final court judgments for fraud, corruption, decisions of a contracting authority for grave professional misconduct and conflict of interest; regrets that the Central Exclusion Database administered by the Commission is not accessible to the public or to the Members of Parliament; recalls that a similar database of debarred firms administered by the World Banks is public; calls on the Commission to make the Central Exclusion Database public.
opfordrer Den Europæiske Revisionsret til at fremlægge de cost-benefit-kriterier, som dens anbefalinger er baseret på, samt de nødvendige konkrete kriterier til måling af innovation;
OJ C 331, 14.11.2013, p.
Del II
10.
Den Europæiske Revisionsrets særberetning nr. 11/2012 med titlen »Direkte støtte for ammekøer, moderfår og geder under delvis gennemførelse af enkeltbetalingsordningen«
OJ L 11, 16.1.2003, p.