natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
bemærker, at den tekniske ekspertise i de regionale sekretariater bør forbedres for at gøre det lettere at identificere spørgsmål. som skal behandles via initiativer, og forbedre forberedelsen og gennemførelsen af de enkelte projekter;
Takes the view that despite the limitations relating to the low level of funding allocated to biodiversity and to the difficulties involved in assessing the way in which such funding is used, it is essential to maintain the funding at this stage;
glæder sig over, at partnerlande siden maj 2013 kan foreslå projekter, som øger muligheden for at reagere på nye trusler;
Emphasises the fact that protecting biodiversity is not just a noble environmental aim, but that such a policy also has significant potential to create new skills, jobs and business opportunities;
bemærker, at forsinkelsen mellem projektforslaget og den efterfølgende godkendelse og gennemførelse yderligere bør reduceres;
Emphasises the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity protection and conservation in the development, setting-up and financing of all other Union policies (including agriculture, forestry, fisheries, regional development and cohesion, energy, industry, transport, tourism, development cooperation and aid, and research and development) so as to make Union sector-specific and budget policies more consistent and to ensure that the Union honours its binding commitments to protect biodiversity; points out, in this context, that cooperation between local, regional, national and Union authorities should be stepped up;
understreger, at det er nødvendigt med et bredere strategisk samarbejde for at forbedre sammenhængen og koordineringen af de forskellige finansieringsinstrumenter på sikkerhedsområdet; understreger, at forbedret koordinering mellem de relevante aktører inden for CBRN vil øge effektiviteten af de eksisterende initiativer;
Notes that, despite the guidance and impetus provided by the Commission, it is for the Member States alone to set financing priorities in accordance with their own needs, and that the vast majority of Member States does not use the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) as an instrument with which to protect biodiversity;
mener, at det ville være fordelagtigt for initiativet, hvis der var en klarere skelnen mellem den interne og eksterne dimension af CBRN's aktioner [22];
Takes the view, therefore, that given the low take-up rate (0,79 %) there is a need to consider making it mandatory for a proportion of ERDF funding (percentage to be confirmed) to be earmarked for the promotion of biodiversity;
Del XXIV
Part XIX
Revisionsrettens særberetning nr. 19/2014 med titlen »EU's førtiltrædelsesbistand til Serbien«
Special Report No 13/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti’
opfordrer de serbiske myndigheder til at forbedre kvaliteten af og yderligere rationalisere deres nationale strategier og handlingsplaner for i tilstrækkelig grad at afklare forskellige politiske og socioøkonomiske spørgsmål; opfordrer Kommissionen om nødvendigt til at stille sig til rådighed for at yde den nødvendige tekniske bistand i denne forbindelse;
Welcomes the Special Report No 13/2014 evaluating the Union support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti as an important contribution to the overall political debate about the Union's external humanitarian and development policies; takes note of the findings and recommendations;
understreger betydningen af at udarbejde nationale strategier inden for politisk følsomme områder; opfordrer de relevante myndigheder til inden for følgende centrale områder i regeringsførelsen at udarbejde strategier og medtage en realistisk tidsplan for gennemførelsen: territorial decentralisering og en strategi til at koordinere implementeringen af reformen af forvaltningen af offentlige finanser;
Welcomes and takes note of the main conclusions and recommendations of the final report on the evaluation of the Union cooperation with the Republic of Haiti carried out by the Commission's Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development — EuropeAid at the request of the Parliament and sets out its observations and recommendations below;
opfordrer indtrængende Kommissionen og EU-delegationen i Serbien til at forebygge de problemer, som opstod i den første del af programmeringsperioden 2007-2013, dvs. udvælgelsen af underudviklede eller problematiske projekter; støtter samarbejdet mellem Kommissionen og de serbiske myndigheder for at løse de konstaterede problemer, herunder mangel på støtte fra nationale myndigheder, manglende interinstitutionelt samarbejde, dårlig projektudformning, dårligt defineret mandat, finansieringsløsninger, der ikke er bæredygtige, og manglende evne til at tage ved lære af fejltagelser i tidligere projekter;
General comments
glæder sig over, at projekter, der vedrører regeringsførelse, generelt har opnået gode resultater, men mener, at projekternes gennemførelse og kontrolsystemer var svage eller ineffektive, navnlig hvor Revisionsretten konstaterede væsentlige mangler i fire ud af de otte reviderede projekter vedrørende regeringsførelse, som vedrører instrumentet til førtiltrædelsesbistand;
Reiterates the overall satisfaction with the work and efforts carried out by the Commission's services in response to the earthquake in Haiti in 2010 and this, in an extremely critical situation for the Union delegation and its staff; welcomes in this respect the Commission's ability to withhold payments and disbursements as a consequence to unsatisfactory progress in the Government's financial management and deficiencies in national public procurement procedures;
påpeger, at der har været rapporteret om begrænsede fremskridt med reformen af retsvæsenet siden 2007;
Regrets the weaknesses identified in the coordination between donors and within the Commission's services as also elaborated by an evaluation of the Union's cooperation with the Republic of Haiti (2008-2012) [21], which was issued on behalf of the Commission; calls, in this respect, for a better articulation of the humanitarian aid and development aid with a stronger link between relief, rehabilitation and development by means of a permanent LRRD (linking of relief, rehabilitation and development) framework; considers that integrated approaches with clearly stated coordination objectives and a coherent country strategy between the Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department (ECHO) and EuropeAid, alongside the sharing of best practices, have to be set up wherever possible; welcomes, in this respect, the inclusion of the systematic integration of the LRRD approach in the funding cycle covering the period 2014-20; calls furthermore on the Commission's services to improve the transition from short-term humanitarian activities to long-term development interventions and to develop a coherent coordination, not only among different Union actors but also with national priorities through a common strategy by means of a joint humanitarian and development framework; invites the Commission to enter into a dialogue with Parliament if an effective coordination among the various financial instruments in humanitarian and development aid is hindered by the existing legal framework; believes furthermore that the involvement of local civil society non-governmental organisations can strengthen the use of the local knowledge base in order to better identify rehabilitation needs and to supervise progress achieved by national authorities;
insisterer på, at det er nødvendigt at styrke den nuværende beskyttelse for whistleblowere, der er beskrevet i den nationale antikorruptionsstrategi 2013-2018; insisterer på, at de serbiske myndigheder bør fremme udarbejdelsen af ny lovgivning om whistleblowing, og at en sådan lovgivning bør vække tillid og tilskynde potentielle whistleblowere til at træde frem;
Recalls the recommendations in the aftermath of the visit by the delegation of Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control to Haiti in February 2012 and insists, as a constant principle, on the salient issue of traceability and accountability of Union development funds, in particular by linking budget support to performance, in particular with a clear definition of obligations and duties in the national administration to ensure adequate transparency, traceability and accountability; reiterates its call for putting more emphasis on the fight against endemic corruption; points out that humanitarian aid should be based on an exit strategy and stresses that funds should be channelled through the Haitian institutions whenever possible, within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement, in order to ensure ownership and to support the strengthening of the national organs, including the Procurement Agency, which should act as a control filter; invites the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) to emphasise the conditionality matrix for sectorial budget support;
tilslutter sig Revisionsrettens anbefalinger og opfordrer Kommissionen til at være tilstrækkelig opmærksom med henblik på at fastsætte mål, vurdere behovene og tage ved lære af tidligere projekter og undgå forsinkelser og ineffektive indkøbsprocedurer; understreger betydningen af bæredygtighed, idet resultaterne gav anledning til en række spørgsmål i to tredjedele af projekterne, navnlig dem, der vedrører regeringsførelse;
Recalls that ‘State building’ is at the centre of the Union development strategy and the cornerstone of any such crisis situation, in line with the principles for intervention in fragile contexts; notes that this includes supporting institutional building, the transparency and efficiency of public financial management, budgetary allocations and effectiveness of public expenditure, with reinforced political and policy dialogues;
Del XXV
Calls for the definition of a good policy mix in the logic of the Union intervention through a comprehensive approach to state and non-state/non-governmental stakeholders and to the sectors support to be provided through rapid sectorial needs assessment and this, to the benefit of the viability, complementarity and sustainability of projects;
Revisionsrettens særberetning nr. 20/2014 med titlen »Har EFRU-støtten til SMV'er på e-handelsområdet været effektiv?«
Orientations for the future
glæder sig over Revisionsrettens særberetning nr. 20/2014 og tilslutter sig dens konklusioner og anbefalinger;
Considers that beyond the Haitian situation, measures need to be discussed and improved in order to strengthen the policy framework of intervention and disaster risk reduction with the ultimate purpose of limiting the risk for human lives and their human living conditions to a minimum; believes that investment in disaster risk reduction is crucial as a full component of sustainable development, as well as highly cost-effective, as it allows for a significantly more efficient and effective use of resources than paying the bill for disaster response;
glæder sig også over Kommissionens konstruktive reaktion på Revisionsrettens anbefalinger;
Considers that situations of crisis and fragility require the development of policies which call for new approaches, new methods and expertise, particularly concerning activities such as (i) identifying risks at different operational levels, (ii) making scenario and projections of likely consequences and (iii) designing instruments to avoid, reduce and prepare for risks and potential disaster; calls for a flexible approach in order to allow the Commission to adapt its measures and instruments for assistance adequately and rapidly to a crisis and post-crisis situation; notes in this context that in the meantime the Commission has set up a system to mobilise experts in various fields of competence in order to allow at short notice the deployment of additional staff to Union delegations or headquarter services in the case of staff shortage;
bemærker, at e-handelsteknologier er nøglen til at forbedre de små og mellemstore virksomheders (SMV'ernes) udvikling og konkurrenceevne; påpeger SMV'ernes betydning for den økonomiske udvikling og jobskabelsen i Unionen;
Encourages the Commission and the EEAS to work systematically on the four phases of the disaster management cycle namely mitigation and preparedness, response and recovery towards the definition of strategic framework for disaster risk management and resilience-building; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to inform Parliament about the developments in particular with regard to risk management and the preparedness to implement and achieve programme objectives in a post-disaster context;
glæder sig over, at Revisionsrettens særberetning understregede betydningen af resultatmålinger og europæisk merværdi;
Recalls that in the circumstances of any such crisis, due care has to be attributed to the soundness and operational effectiveness of the national governance framework for managing disaster risk reduction as a pre-condition for the success of the Union intervention; recalls that the assessment of any national governance framework should take into account, inter alia, the existing accountability frameworks for outcomes, the existing definition and decision of responsibilities at central and local levels, a clear chain of commands and controls, information channels among various actors/donors alongside with feedback mechanisms on projects;
bemærker, at selv om onlinehandel er blevet mere tilgængelig, så var de projekter, der var udvalgt til investering, svage; bemærker, at mangel på sammenligning i forbindelse med udvælgelsen af ansøgninger og på omfattende forretningsoplysninger resulterede i, at mere end en tredjedel af projekterne i ringe grad eller slet ikke gav valuta for pengene;
Supports the Court of Auditors' recommendations with regard to Union support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti and welcomes the Commission's response to also accept the recommendations;
påpeger, at ti af de 30 reviderede medfinansierede projekter ville være blevet gennemført også uden offentlig medfinansiering, at fem af disse projekter var påbegyndt, før tilskuddet blev meddelt, og at tre af dem endog var påbegyndt, inden virksomheden havde indgivet en anmodning om medfinansiering;
Part XX
mener, at det bør være obligatorisk at fremlægge en forretningsplan, der viser den europæiske merværdi, for at undgå en dødvægtseffekt;
Special Report No 14/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘How do the EU institutions and bodies calculate, reduce and offset their greenhouse gas emissions?’
understreger, at medlemsstaterne bør indføre udvælgelseskriterier og -procedurer, der sikrer, at de udvalgte projekter maksimerer merværdien med hensyn til at fremme udviklingen af e-handel i SMV'er og nå målene for den digitale dagsorden for Europa;
Believes that all Union institutions and bodies should aim at a common approach to their greenhouse gas emissions and their possible reduction; considers that in order to achieve this they need to comprehensively calculate their greenhouse gas emissions and should not refrain from publishing their results;
bemærker, at manglende overvågning fra Kommissionens side gjorde det umuligt at vurdere, i hvilket omfang støtte fra Den Europæiske Fond for Regionaludvikling (EFRU) har bidraget til opfyldelsen af målene for informationsteknologi på nationalt plan og på EU-plan samt SMV'ernes egne forretningsplaner;
Believes that the Commission, in order to maintain its reliability in environmental negotiations with third parties, should put more effort in collecting more data on its own greenhouse gas emissions;
mener, at Kommissionen bør sikre, at den modtager sammenhængende og pålidelige oplysninger fra medlemsstaterne om anvendelsen af EFRU-midler; mener, at disse oplysninger bør vise fremskridtene i de operationelle programmer, ikke kun i finansiel henseende, men også med hensyn til resultater;
Invites those Union institutions and bodies who have no Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) certificate to consider applying it promptly; emphasises, however, that EMAS should be considered as a tool to structure, inter alia, greenhouse gas emissions and should not be considered as the sole ultimate goal of the green policy of the institutions;
deler Revisionsrettens synspunkt om, at et minimumssæt solide indikatorer med tilhørende mål bør defineres i tilskudsaftalerne og måles og efterfølgende overvåges, både når projektet er gennemført og er i drift samt på et senere tidspunkt med henblik på at evaluere resultaterne;
Points out that offsetting greenhouse gas emissions can be used by the Union institutions and bodies to a greater degree to reduce their carbon footprint; agrees with the Court of Auditors that using high-quality offsets in addition to emission reduction measures (and not instead of such reduction measures) would address these issues appropriately; notes however that offsetting should come second to investing these funds to further improvement of environmental policy of the Union institutions and bodies;
Del XXVI
Welcomes the fact that some of the Union institutions have started pilot projects of green procurement; hopes that the results prove to be promising and that green procurement will become a standard procedure of the Union institutions and bodies in the future;
Revisionsrettens særberetning nr. 21/2014 med titlen »EU-finansierede lufthavnsinfrastrukturer giver ikke valuta for pengene«
Stresses that in the implementation of these policies, human factors remain a key aspect; urges therefore the management in the Union institutions and bodies responsible for these policies to train and improve further their skills and understanding of the importance of the greenhouse gas emissions of the institutions; hopes that the establishment of the new College of Commissioners in 2014 provides an opportunity of a new opening in implementation of higher standards in the Commission and its agencies;
erkender, at Kommissionen allerede har indført ændringer, som behandler mange af de spørgsmål, der er beskrevet i særberetningen, og støtter generelt den nye reguleringsramme, som Kommissionen har beskrevet; foreslår i lyset af dette, at Kommissionen bør rapportere tilbage til Parlamentets Budgetkontroludvalg senest et år efter vedtagelsen af denne beslutning om de fremskridt, der er gjort med disse henstillinger;
Part XXI
støtter Revisionsrettens anbefaling om, at medlemsstaterne har sammenhængende planer for udvikling af lufthavne, og henstiller til, at disse planer godkendes af Kommissionen, inden der ydes finansiering til specifikke projekter; henstiller endvidere til, at disse regionale, nationale eller overnationale planer ikke kun bør tage hensyn til lufttransport, men også til anden offentlig transport med lignende rejsetider i forhold til flyvetider, herunder tog og busser for at forebygge mætning af markedet og øge tjenesternes levedygtighed;
Special Report No 15/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The External Borders Fund has fostered financial solidarity but requires better measurement of results and needs to provide further EU added value’
henstiller til, at der kun ydes finansiering til økonomisk levedygtige lufthavne;
Notes with concern that the strategic objectives of the External Borders Fund (EBF) have not been clear, and that, in particular, there is tension between the general nature of the EBF as solidarity mechanism and its concentration on concrete objectives for better cooperation in the field of border controls and visas;
henstiller til Kommissionen at undersøge alle nye projekter med henblik på en analyse af oplandet for at sikre levedygtighed ved i hvert tilfælde at tage hensyn til betydningen af regionale lufthavne for tilgængeligheden og mobiliteten i Unionen;
Notes that for the Commission the successful launch of SIS II, VIS and Eurosur in all Member States indicates the contribution of the EBF; is of the opinion, however, that such a general statement can never be used as a satisfactory reply to the Court of Auditors' specific criticisms of lacking performance indicators;
mener, at Kommissionen som en prioritet nøje bør overvåge de medlemsstater, der ifølge rapporten identificeres som medlemsstater, der tidligere har haft særligt problematiske projekter;
Notes that similar problems may arise in respect of the objectives of the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund (ISF), since again this instrument serves both solidarity between Member States in respect of border controls management and the realisation of a uniform and high level of control of the external borders and the effective processing of Schengen visas, in compliance with the Union's commitment to fundamental freedoms and human rights;
pålægger sin formand at sende denne beslutning til Rådet, Kommissionen, Den Europæiske Unions Domstol og Revisionsretten og drage omsorg for, at den offentliggøres i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende (L-udgaven).
Emphasises that Member States, whilst recognising the importance of effective border controls at the common external borders as part of the Schengen acquis, regard border controls management and, to a lesser extent, the processing of visas still as essentially national competences;
EUT L 66 af 8.3.2013.
Calls on the Member States to therefore include the ISF in national strategies for border management in order to contribute to consular cooperation, to Frontex operations or to emergency actions and specific actions which are of importance to the Schengen area as a whole; urges the Commission and the Member States to improve their cooperation in this regard;
EUT C 403 af 13.11.2014, s. 1.
Requests that the Commission examine whether it may be useful to divide the border controls and visas part of the ISF into several earmarked segments: one for solidarity, one for the fulfilment of consular cooperation, Frontex operations and emergency and specific actions, and one for actions that are particularly relevant from a national perspective;
EUT C 398 af 12.11.2014, s. 1.
Recommends that Member States develop and use relevant and measurable indicators for the output, outcome and impact of the funded projects; stresses that high quality ex ante verifications should be in place to ensure that all funded projects serve concrete and measurable objectives and have added value; notes that ex post verifications would help to provide quality control mechanisms;
EUT C 403 af 13.11.2014, s. 128.
Points out that further Union added value can be achieved through additional contributions from the Member States to Frontex operations by making obligatory the entering of at least part of the ISF co-financed assets into Frontex's technical equipment pool obligatory;
Vedtagne tekster, P8_TA(2015)0118 (se side 25 i denne EUT).
Is worried about the irregularities found by the Court of Auditors in the various national procurement policies and states that the exception clause for defence and security procurements may not be used in cases where less restrictive procedures could have been used without compromising security; recommends the streamlining of the procurement procedures to ensure the timely implementation of the funding;
EFT L 248 af 16.9.2002, s. 1.
Commends the Commission for having taken corrective financial measures in the case of a project that was found in breach of fundamental freedoms and human rights, but calls upon the Commission to identify, as far as possible, ex ante any possible risks in this regard, especially when it comes to the manner in which border controls are carried out in respect of the right to seek asylum;
EUT L 298 af 26.10.2012, s. 1.
Emphasises the need to improve the standard of data collection on the funded projects at a national level in order to increase the degree of transparency;
Rådets forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 1287/2003 af 15. juli 2003 om harmonisering af bruttonationalindkomsten i markedspriser (»BNI-forordningen«) ( EUT L 181 af 19.7.2003, s. 1).
Part XXII