natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
bemærker, at Revisionsretten i betragtning af de muligheder, som den ny programmeringsperiode 2014-2020 og en ny handlingsplan mellem EU og Den Palæstinensiske Myndighed giver, anbefaler, at EU-Udenrigstjenesten og Kommissionen foretager en gennemgribende revision af PEGASE og tager højde for de i nedenstående punkt anførte punkter;
the more restrictive EGF conditions, in particular the trade criterion as the main intervention criterion for applications based on globalisation;
bemærker, at EU-Udenrigstjenesten og Kommissionen bør styrke programmeringen af den fremtidige direkte finansielle støtte fra PEGASE, særlig ved at:
the length of the procedure for approving EGF application;
knytte den tættere sammen med handlingsplanen mellem EU og Den Palæstinensiske Myndighed
Reiterates the fact, nevertheless, that the EGF and the ESF can be seen as complementary instruments; asks the Commission, however, to make clear the rationale for setting the EGF apart from the ESF, as the ESF turns out to be in some cases better adjusted at delivering timely results and has in some cases better co- and pre-financing rates; notes, moreover, that the ESF is more well-known among the Union public in some Member States than the EGF [27];
planlægge tildelingerne på et flerårigt grundlag
Emphasises that it is in the interest of sound financial management that the reintegration of the unemployed into the labour market following their participation in EGF measures can be reliably determined; believes that the EGF Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council [28]) should therefore encourage Member States to measure re-integration beyond the end of the implementation period and in addition, that these data should be comparable and preferably interlinked with quantitative objectives;
udvikle resultatindikatorer, særlig inden for sundhed, uddannelse og forvaltning af offentlige finanser, så resultaterne bedre kan vurderes og demonstreres
Welcomes, in the context of the new EGF Regulation for the 2014-2020 programming period (Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [29]), the fact that the Commission has proposed a re-integration objective of 50 % of the redundant workforce to have found new jobs after 12 months of implementation; asks, however, on what rationale this figure is based;
udvikle en robust intern kontrolmekanisme for at sikre udbetalingskriteriernes overholdelse og forhindre enhver ulovlig anvendelse af PEGASE DFS-midler;
Holds the firm view that EGF assistance should primarily be used for retraining and qualification and other targeted active labour market measures, and not on income support which would in any case be paid by national unemployment schemes; asks therefore for income support to be limited to 25 % per EGF measures;
bemærker, at Kommissionen bør reducere omkostningerne forbundet med at forvalte den direkte finansielle støtte fra PEGASE ved:
Underlines the fact that Union financial assistance should create European added-value; asks, therefore, that the Union added value of the EGF measures, as compared to the Union added value of the ESF measures, be considered in its quantitative and qualitative aspects in the annual discharge procedure in order to ensure the most effective policy measurements or to provide the reasons for not including these figures; shares the Court of Auditors’ view that a period of 41 weeks between submitting an application for EGF assistance and payments is unacceptably high and that such a duration discourages applicant countries in distress and in need of Union solidarity; notes, however, the information supplied by the Commission in its replies; reminds all parties concerned of the Union’s budgetary authorities’ decision not to integrate the EGF into the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), which means that all applications have to undergo a specific budgetary procedure, and notwithstanding the above explanations, calls on all the parties concerned to switch to e-applications and to limit additional information after the original application to exceptional cases, and in any case, no later than three months after the original application;
så vidt muligt at anvende konkurrencebaserede udbud i forbindelse med kontrakter med relation til forvaltning og kontrol af den direkte finansielle støtte fra PEGASE
Holds the view, however, that such an important policy instrument should be thoroughly evaluated and proposes, therefore, to link the review of the EGF 2014-2020 to the proposed mid-term review of the MFF 2014-2020;
at forenkle PEGASE-mekanismens forvaltningssystem og gøre EU's repræsentation i Palæstina ansvarlig for at administrere PEGASE-databasen og overtage en del af den kontrol, som i dag udføres af eksterne serviceleverandører;
Part XXII
pålægger sin formand at sende denne beslutning til Rådet, Kommissionen, Den Europæiske Unions Domstol og Revisionsretten og drage omsorg for, at den offentliggøres i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende (L-udgaven).
Special Report No 8/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development’
Vedtagne tekster, P7_TA(2014)0287 (se side 30 i denne EUT).
Notes that the Commission should:
Verdenssundhedsorganisationen (WHO) skønner, at 6,3 % af alle dødsfald på verdensplan (8 %, hvis man kun tager udviklingslandene i betragtning) kunne undgås med bedre vandforsyning, sanitet og hygiejne.
define and assess Union needs for improving the economic value of the forests and in that respect integrate efforts and insights of related policy fields;
Størstedelen af disse undgåelige dødsfald er blandt børn i udviklingslandene.
clearly define the key features that would ensure that Union support is targeted to address those needs, and thus create Union added value;
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 882/2004 af 29. april 2004 om offentlig kontrol med henblik på verifikation af, at foderstof- og fødevarelovgivningen samt dyresundheds- og dyrevelfærdsbestemmelserne overholdes (EUT L 165 af 30.4.2004, s. 1).
Notes that the Member States should:
EUT L 286 af 17.10.2012, s. 376.
adequately describe in their RDPs the specific economic needs and opportunities of the different types of forest areas and beneficiaries;
EUT L 286 af 17.10.2012, s. 387.
enhance forest management by providing for the elaboration of forest management plans for the bulk of forest holdings and the promotion of certification of forest areas;
Vedtagne tekster, P7_TA(2013)0187.
set adequate requirements to ensure that forestry support within the rural development policy is consistent, in line with state aid and other policy areas provisions, thus maximising its effectiveness;
COM(2013) 246 af 22.4.2013.
put in place adequate procedures to ensure that support is effective so as to actually increase the economic value of the forest areas where the investments take place;
EUT C 99 E af 3.4.2012, s. 64.
Notes that the Commission should improve its monitoring of the measure in order to ensure that the Member States implement it in line with the specific objectives set and in order to obtain short and long term sustainability; notes that in concrete terms, the Member States should require beneficiaries to provide details of the value of their forest areas both prior to and after the aided investments and managing bodies should be required to validate these values;
EUT C 169 E af 15.6.2012, s. 66.
Part XXIII
EUT L 315 af 14.11.2012, s. 1.
Special Report No 9/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU support for governance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’
KOM(2011) 751 af 15.11.2011.
In close coordination with the national authorities and other development partners, notably Member States, the Commission and the EEAS should:
KOM(2011) 752 af 15.11.2011.
with a view to programming for the 11th EDF and the design of future Union programmes, (i) pay increased attention to ensuring an appropriate balance of aid between provinces, especially the poorer ones, in order to avoid geographical disparities in the distribution of development aid while bearing in mind the importance of stabilising the Great Lakes region as a whole; (ii) combine support at a central level with programmes at the provincial level that link political and territorial decentralisation with improved natural resource management strategies and infrastructure rehabilitation and development; and (iii) reconsider Union support for improved management of natural resources on the basis of a comprehensive needs assessment;
KOM(2011) 752, artikel 50, stk. 6.
place greater emphasis, in its dialogue with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) government, on the fact that democratic elections are a key component of governance and carefully assess all risks to ensure that Union programmes in this area do not support regime entrenchment;
Skrivelse af 10. december 2010 fra Victor Caldera, formand for Revisionsretten — CPT11656EN01-10PP-OR.doc.
promote improved DRC government accountability by considering increased support to strengthen the capacity of national oversight institutions, in particular the specialised committees of the National Assembly and the supreme audit institution;
EFT L 311 af 14.11.2002, s. 3.
in all governance areas covered by the Union cooperation strategy, systematically consider the need to support the fight against fraud and corruption, as well as the reform of the judiciary;
Den Europæiske Revisionsrets pressemeddelelse ECA/13/05.
The Commission should:
Kommissionen mener, at termen »permanent« er en fejlagtig oversættelse af termen »durabile«.
at the outset of programmes and regularly during their implementation, assess the likelihood and potential impact of the main risks to the achievement of programme objectives; notes that this will involve (i) appraising the relevance and credibility of the country’s policies and action plans for improving governance in relation to the available institutional and financial resources and (ii) monitoring progress against commitments made by the DRC authorities;
Der burde have stået »varig«.
establish measures to prevent or mitigate risks and clearly define the course of action to be followed if risks become reality, bearing in mind the risks of fraud and corruption in particular;
COM(2013) 623 af 10.9.2013.
focus objectives on a limited number of priorities;
EUT C 168 E af 14.6.2013, s. 72.
set out a time frame, including mid-term evaluations, which is better adapted to the programme environment;
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 1315/2013 af 11. december 2013 om Unionens retningslinjer for udvikling af det transeuropæiske transportnet og om ophævelse af afgørelse nr. 661/2010/EU (EUT L 348 af 20.12.2013, s. 1).
provide for flexibility during programme implementation so that objectives can be reviewed promptly where appropriate;
EUT L 406 af 30.12.2006, s. 1.
The Commission and the EEAS should:
EUT L 347 af 20.12.2013, s. 855.
strengthen their structured political and policy dialogue with the country; notes that this will involve, in full respect of the provisions of the Cotonou Agreement (notably article 96) (i) setting clear, relevant, realistic and time-bound targets which are mutually agreed upon with the national authorities, (ii) periodically assessing compliance with the agreed targets as part of the regular political dialogue with the government, and (iii) if the DRC government shows insufficient commitment to compliance, consider, after careful deliberation, adapting or in exceptional cases, suspending or terminating the programme;
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 1307/2013 af 17. december 2013 om fastsættelse af regler for direkte betalinger til landbrugere under støtteordninger inden for rammerne af den fælles landsbrugspolitik og om ophævelse af Rådet forordning (EF) nr. 637/2008 og Rådet forordning (EF) nr. 73/2009 (EUT L 347 af 20.12.2013, s. 608).
urge the DRC government to adopt the necessary measures for improving, where necessary, the functioning of the thematic working groups, and monitor the implementation of those measures;
Ramme og overvågning
take a more active leadership role towards Member States to encourage coordinated policy dialogue and increase Union leverage over the DRC government;
Artikel 1.
provide Parliament by May 2014 with an overview of the state of play of the projects visited by the Court of Auditors, and
I moduli abitativi destinati ad una durevole utilizzazione di cui all'articolo 2 del decreto legge 28 aprile 2009, n. 39, convertito con modificazione alla legge 24 giugno 2009, 11.77, identificati dalle corrispondenti unita immobiliari riepilogate nell’allegato n. 1, che costituisce parte integrante e sostanziale del presente decreto, sono assegnati in proprietà a titolo gratuito al Comune di L'Aquila.
provide Parliament by June 2014 with an overview of all on-going projects in DRC and inform it on how much money will be still available and from which funds;
med bemærkningerne, der er en integrerende del af afgørelsen om decharge for gennemførelsen af Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 2012, Sektion X — Tjenesten for EU's Optræden Udadtil
Part XXIV
der henviser til Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 2012 [1],der henviser til Den Europæiske Unions årsregnskab for regnskabsåret 2012 (COM(2013) 570 — C7-0282/2013) [2],der henviser til Revisionsrettens årsberetning om budgetgennemførelsen i regnskabsåret 2012, med institutionernes svar [3],der henviser til Revisionsrettens erklæring [4] for regnskabsåret 2012 om regnskabernes rigtighed og de underliggende transaktioners lovlighed og formelle rigtighed, jf. artikel 287 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde,der henviser til artikel 314, stk. 10, og artikel 317, 318 og 319 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde,
Special Report No 10/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Common Agricultural Policy: Is the specific support provided under Article 68 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 well designed and implemented?’
der henviser til Rådets forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 1605/2002 af 25. juni 2002 om finansforordningen vedrørende De Europæiske Fællesskabers almindelige budget [5], særlig artikel 50, 86, 145, 146 og 147,der henviser til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU, Euratom) nr. 966/2012 af 25. oktober 2012 om de finansielle regler vedrørende Unionens almindelige budget og om ophævelse af Rådets forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 1605/2002 [6], særlig artikel 164, 165, 166 og 167,der henviser til sine tidligere dechargeafgørelser og -beslutninger,
Specific support for certain agricultural activities should be based on a strict understanding of the provisions of Article 68 and the new delegated acts should require that the granting of such coupled support should be adequately justified to the Commission and checked by it; notes that to be able to assume its ultimate responsibility under the system of shared management, the Commission should play a more active role in establishing the criteria governing the implementation of the measures, and in assessing measures in a comparative way to avoid unexplained and extreme variations in prices, such as those identified in the examples for goats in this Special Report; notes that the legal tools to do this should be established in the new delegated acts; notes that the Member States should be required, in the new delegated acts, to demonstrate that each specific support measure which they intend to introduce is necessary (in terms of the need for and added value of an approach based on derogations), relevant (in terms of implementation arrangements, award criteria and aid levels), and that it satisfies the criteria of sound financial management; in particular and in response to the point expressed by the Court of Auditors that ‘clearly defined cases’ were not clearly defined, implementation of the new Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [30] should overcome the problems identified, by Member States:
der henviser til betænkning fra Budgetkontroludvalget og udtalelse fra Udenrigsudvalget (A7-0199/2014),
establishing clear targets (as per Financial Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012);
bemærker, at Revisionsretten på grundlag af sin revision konkluderede, at betalingerne vedrørende institutionernes og organernes administrationsudgifter og andre udgifter for regnskabsåret, der afsluttedes den 31. december 2012, som helhed betragtet var uden væsentlig fejlforekomst;
creating systematic monitoring systems for all measures taken under the new Articles 52-55 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013;
glæder sig over, at Tjenesten for EU's Optræden Udadtil (EU-Udenrigstjenesten) i sit andet regnskabsår er fortsat med at gennemføre sit budget, uden at Revisionsretten har kunnet konstatere væsentlige fejl, og at de fleste af de problemer, der blev konstateret i Revisionsrettens årsberetning for 2011 som følge af etableringsprocessen, ikke er blevet gentaget;
respecting uniformity in application across the Union so that management and control systems can be streamlined, simple, and comparable;
understreger, at Revisionsretten i sin årsberetning for 2012 bemærkede, at man ikke havde fundet nogen væsentlige svagheder på de reviderede områder for EU-Udenrigstjenesten; bemærker, at der fortsat var visse svagheder ved forvaltningen af tillæg af social karakter, og beklager, at Revisionsretten i sin årsberetning for 2012 rapporterede de samme problemer som i 2011; opfordrer indtrængende EU-Udenrigstjenesten til at gennemføre alle de fremførte bemærkninger; ser med tilfredshed på de skridt, som EU-Udenrigstjenesten foreløbig har truffet på dette område, og opfordrer den til at fremskynde gennemførelsen af sit nye program til løsning af disse problemer;
ensuring documentation of all measures/sub-measures and the use of up to date integrated administration control system (IACS) information where relevant;
er bekymret over, at PMO-systemet endnu ikke var fuldt funktionsdygtigt i 2012, hvilket medførte forkerte betalinger af tillæg af social karakter til de ansatte;
establishing rigorous on-the-spot checks at regional and Member State level;
bemærker svarene på Revisionsrettens bemærkninger og beklager, at de udelukkende beskriver foranstaltninger, der blev truffet i 2013;
Taking account of the variety of possible measures an appropriate system of monitoring should be established to facilitate subsequent evaluation;
bemærker, at det endelige budget for EU-Udenrigstjenestens hovedkvarter i slutningen af 2012 var på 184100000 EUR med en gennemførelsesgrad for forpligtelser på 99,35 % og var på 304500000 EUR for delegationerne med en gennemførelsesgrad for forpligtelser på 99,45 %; bemærker, at delegationernes budget måtte suppleres af Kommissionen til i alt 268000000 EUR;
Once measures have been introduced, the Member States should establish suitable and comprehensive management and control systems to ensure that all the requirements of the Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 can be satisfied; notes that in order to avoid generating disproportionate costs on the limited scale of a specific support measure, the requirement for controls should already be taken into account during the measure’s design phase (simplicity of implementation, ‘controllability’ of criteria, etc.) or possibly even in the decision on whether or not to introduce a given measure;
er bekymret over fremførslen af bevillinger i 2012; foreslår, at man udvikler nøgleresultatindikatorer til at overvåge de mest kritiske områder med henblik på at forbedre budgetgennemførslen i løbet af de kommende år;
Part XXV
minder om, at EU-Udenrigstjenesten er en nyligt oprettet institution, der er resultatet af en konsolidering af en række forskellige tjenester, og at 2011 var dens første driftsår med mange tekniske udfordringer at løfte, navnlig hvad angår indkøb og ansættelse; bemærker, at den overdrevne administrative byrde som følge af nødvendige tiltag for EU-Udenrigstjenestens oprettelse er blevet reduceret i 2012; er dog bekymret over, at EU-Udenrigstjenestens administrerende direktør fortsat udtrykker forbehold, hvad angår nogle af EU-delegationernes kontrakter på sikkerhedsområdet, og at en række EU-delegationer ligeledes har udtrykt deres forbehold;
Special Report No 12/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Can the Commission and Member States show that the EU budget allocated to the rural development policy is well spent?’
glæder sig over det detaljerede svar på en lang række skriftlige og mundtlige forespørgsler fra medlemmer af Parlamentets Budgetkontroludvalg;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ Special Report entitled ‘Can the Commission and the Member States show that the EU budget allocated to the rural development policy is well spent?’, and endorses in principle its recommendations;
bemærker betydningen af den nuværende decharge for fastsættelsen af en ramme for fremtidige dechargeprocedurer og mener, at den vil styrke forventningerne til fremtidige udviklinger og forbedringer af effektiviteten af EU-Udenrigstjenesten og dens aktiviteter;
Points out that there is a need for a greener, fairer and fully legitimate common agriculture policy, which represents the principle of ‘public spending for public goods’, and which would thus represent a significant step forward in the evolution and modernisation of the CAP; recalls that Union agriculture policy has to deliver benefits for the public in general and not only for farmers;
bemærker vanskelighederne forbundet med gennemførelsen af et budget med forskellige kilder, som ikke er afbalancerede, navnlig delegationernes delte omkostninger;
Points out that the rural development programmes are important instruments to create jobs and promote growth, to make agriculture more competitive and to improve the environment; as spending on rural development covers measures supporting farms, agricultural holdings and small businesses and communities in rural areas; considers it necessary that these measures should address the needs of this variety of recipients and thus achieve a variety of objectives; points out that monitoring and evaluation are key to this and considers it important that Parliament and the public know if Union money is spent well;
mener, at den nuværende opbygning af EU-Udenrigstjenestens budget med bidrag fra Kommissionens 26 forskellige budgetposter og Den Europæiske Udviklingsfond umuliggør et klart overblik over de reelle omkostninger og udgifter for EU-Udenrigstjenestens og delegationernes arbejde; understøtter EU-Udenrigstjenestens forslag fra november 2013 om forenkling og opfordrer Kommissionen til at gennemføre de foreslåede ændringer og undersøge mulighederne for yderligere at forenkle den aktuelle finansiering af EU-Udenrigstjenesten;
Invites the Member States to set specific measurable objectives within their RDPs, focusing on what the rural development expenditure is intended to achieve; believes that the Commission should ensure — prior to their approval- that the Member States’ RDPs contain clear objectives and evaluation plans that will provide information on the results achieved by the planned actions according to the agreed objectives and in time to inform policy decisions for the next programming period;
anser det faktum, at stillinger i EU-Udenrigstjenesten nu også er åbne for Parlamentets tjenestemænd, som en positiv udvikling;
Is concerned about the fact that the Court of Auditors has found that the current monitoring and evaluation arrangements have failed to provide the information to show that measures are targeted towards achieving policy objectives in the most efficient way; asks that Parliament be clearly informed on the achieved results of the spending on rural development;