natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Posten Norges markedsandel var stabil i perioden 2011-2013, og det samme gjaldt dets største konkurrenter [57].
This reasoning appears to be in line with a Commission merger decision where a further segmentation within freight forwarding by road transport was made according to the categories ‘less than truck load or groupage’, ‘semi-truck load or part load’ and ‘full-truck load’.
Derudover er mange store internationale operatører aktive på dette marked og lægger et stort konkurrencemæssigt pres på Posten Norge.
‘Less than truck load or groupage’ was defined as everything bigger than a parcel but less than 2 tonnes whereas ‘semi-truck load or part load’ was defined as freight above 2 tonnes up to a full-truck load.
I lyset af disse faktorer og i overensstemmelse med den norske konkurrencemyndigheds vurdering og konklusion [58] konkluderer Tilsynsmyndigheden, at markedet for spedition — generelt gods er direkte eksponeret for konkurrence.
‘Full-truck load’ includes any freight that fills a whole truck.
Spedition via land — dellast
The Commission stated that the different handling requirements suggested separate product markets as the infrastructure and market participants were different.
I lighed med argumenterne i afsnit 1.5.1 har ansøgeren anført, at der findes et særskilt marked for spedition — dellast med henvisning til distribution af varer med en vægt på over 2 til 2,5 ton, som ikke håndteres i terminaler, men snarere transporteres på vej eller jernbane fra afsenderen til modtageren.
Ultimately, the Commission found it unnecessary to exactly delineate the markets as even on the narrowest possible market definition, there were no indications that the parties would become dominant [55].
Også her anfører ansøgeren, at termo- og massetransport ikke bør medtages i denne markedsafgrænsning [59].
Although the Commission has considered a further sub-segmentation of freight-forwarding services, according to the type of operations, into domestic and international freight forwarding, as well as according to the type of forwarding means into freight forwarding by air, land and sea [56], the Authority finds it unnecessary in the present case to delineate the relevant product markets beyond the definition outlined above.
Uanset om det relevante produktmarked har en snæver eller bred afgrænsning, påvirker det ikke den endelige vurdering.
Similarly, whether bulk and thermo are considered separately or as part of the freight forwarding — general cargo market will also not affect the final assessment so no further distinction will be made for the purpose of this Decision and the precise definition of the relevant market can thus be left open.
Tilsynsmyndigheden finder det derfor unødvendigt at afgrænse de relevante produktmarkeder yderligere i forhold til ovenstående afgrænsning og vil vurdere, om Posten Norge er direkte eksponeret for konkurrence på markedet for spedition — dellast uden termo- og massetransport.
On the market for freight forwarding — general cargo, Norway Post had a market share by value in 2013 of 10 % whereas Schenker had 13 % and PostNord 12 %.
På markedet for spedition — dellast har Posten Norge haft en markedsandel efter værdi i 2013 på 16 %, mens Schenker havde 11 %, og PostNord havde 9 %.
Norway Post's market share was stable in the period 2011-2013 and the same applied to its main competitors [57].
Posten Norges markedsandel er faldet let siden 2011.
In addition, many large international operators are active on this market and exert significant competitive pressure on Norway Post.
Derudover er mange store internationale operatører aktive på dette marked og lægger et stort konkurrencemæssigt pres på Posten Norge [60].
Given these factors, and in line with the Norwegian Competition Authority's assessment and conclusion [58], the Authority concludes that the market for freight forwarding — general cargo is directly exposed to competition.
I overensstemmelse med den norske konkurrencemyndigheds vurdering og konklusion [61] finder Tilsynsmyndigheden, at disse faktorer skal ses som et tegn på, at markedet for spedition — dellast er direkte eksponeret for konkurrence.
Freight forwarding by land — Part load
KONKLUSIONER
In line with the arguments put forward under Section 1.5.1, the applicant argues that there is a separate market for freight forwarding — part load, referring to the distribution of goods exceeding 2 to 2,5 tonnes, not processed in terminals but rather transported by road or rail directly from the sender to the recipient.
Henset til ovenstående indikatorer er betingelsen om direkte eksponering for konkurrence i artikel 30, stk. 1, i direktiv 2004/17/EF opfyldt med hensyn til følgende tjenester, som udbydes i Norge:
Here again, the applicant argues that thermo and bulk transport should be excluded from this market definition [59].
standardlevering af B2B-pakker (national)
Regardless of whether or not the relevant product market is defined narrowly or broadly, the final assessment will not be affected.
standardlevering af B2B-pakker (international udgående)
Therefore, the Authority finds it unnecessary to further delineate the relevant product markets beyond the definition outlined above and will assess whether Norway Post is directly exposed to competition on the market for freight forwarding — part load, excluding thermo and bulk transport.
eksprespakkelevering dag 1/om natten (national)
On the market for freight forwarding — part load, Norway Post had a market share by value in 2013 of 16 % whereas Schenker had 11 % and PostNord 9 %.
eksprespakkelevering (international, herunder indgående og udgående)
Norway Post's market share had been decreasing slightly since 2011.
spedition via land (generelt gods/samlegods)
In addition, many large international operators are active on this market and exert significant competitive pressure on Norway Post [60].
spedition via land (dellast)
In line with the Norwegian Competition Authority's assessment and conclusion [61], the Authority finds that these factors should be taken as an indication that the market for freight forwarding — part load is directly exposed to competition.
Eftersom betingelsen om ubegrænset adgang til markedet synes at være opfyldt, finder direktiv 2004/17/EF ikke anvendelse, når ordregiverne tildeler kontrakter om levering af de i litra a)-f) i betragtning 54 nævnte tjenester i Norge, eller når der arrangeres designkonkurrencer om udførelse af sådanne aktiviteter i Norge.
CONCLUSIONS
Denne beslutning er baseret på de oplysninger, som Tilsynsmyndigheden har modtaget.
In view of the abovementioned indicators, the condition of direct exposure to competition laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC is met in respect of the following services provided in Norway:
Den kan revideres, hvis betydelige ændringer i retlige eller faktiske forhold betyder, at betingelserne om anvendelsen af artikel 30, stk. 1, i direktiv 2004/17/EF ikke længere er opfyldt.
standard B2B parcel delivery (national);
Denne beslutning udelukker ikke anvendelsen af EØS-reglerne om offentlige udbud på områder, som ikke er omfattet af afgørelsen.
standard B2B parcel delivery (international outbound);
Endvidere bør det erindres, at indkøbskontrakter, der omfatter flere aktiviteter, bør behandles i overensstemmelse med artikel 9 i direktiv 2004/17/EF.
express Day 1/in-night parcel delivery (national);
Det betyder, at såfremt en ordregiver deltager i en »blandet« indkøbskontrakt, det vil sige indkøb, som skal støtte udførelsen af begge aktiviteter, som er undtaget fra anvendelsen af direktiv 2004/17/EF, og aktiviteter, som ikke er undtaget, skal der tages højde for de aktiviteter, som kontrakten principielt er rettet mod.
express parcel delivery (international, including inbound and outbound);
I tilfælde af sådanne blandede indkøbskontrakter, hvor formålet principielt er at støtte aktiviteter, som ikke var undtaget, finder bestemmelserne i direktiv 2004/17/EF anvendelse.
freight forwarding by land (general cargo/groupage);
Hvis det er objektivt umuligt at fastslå, hvilken aktivitet kontrakten principielt er rettet mod, tildeles kontrakten i overensstemmelse med reglerne i artikel 9, stk. 2 og 3, i direktiv 2004/17/EF.
freight forwarding by land (part load).
Foranstaltningerne i denne beslutning er i overensstemmelse med udtalelse fra Det Rådgivende Udvalg for Offentlige Aftaler —
Since the condition of unrestricted access to the market is deemed to be met, Directive 2004/17/EC shall not apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable the provision of services listed in points (a) to (f) of recital 54 in Norway, nor when design contests are organised for the pursuit of such activity in Norway.
VEDTAGET DENNE BESLUTNING:
This Decision is based on the information submitted before the Authority.
Artikel 1
It may be revised, should significant changes in the legal or factual situation mean that the conditions for the applicability of Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC are no longer met.
Retsakten i punkt 4 i bilag XVI til EØS-aftalen om fastlæggelse af fremgangsmåderne ved indgåelse af offentlige kontrakter i forsyningssektoren (direktiv 2004/17/EF) finder ikke anvendelse på kontrakter, som tildeles af ordregivere, og som skal gøre det muligt at tilbyde følgende tjenesteydelser i Norge:
This Decision does not preclude the applicability of EEA rules on public procurement in areas not covered by its scope.
Artikel 2
Furthermore, it is recalled that procurement contracts covering several activities should be treated in accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Denne beslutning er rettet til Kongeriget Norge.
This means that, where a contracting entity is engaged in ‘mixed’ procurement, that is procurement used to support the performance of both activities exempted from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC and activities not exempted, regard must be had to the activities for which the contract is principally intended.
Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, 6. juli 2015.
In the event of such mixed procurement, where the purpose is principally to support activities which were not exempted, the provisions of Directive 2004/17/EC are to be applied.
På EFTA-Tilsynsmyndighedens vegne
Where it is objectively impossible to determine for which activity the contract is principally intended, the contract is to be awarded in accordance with the rules referred to in Article 9(2) and (3) of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Medlem af kollegiet
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the EFTA Public Procurement Committee,
Fungerende direktør
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
EUT L 134 af 30.4.2004, s. 1.
Article 1
Modtaget af Tilsynsmyndigheden den 23. marts 2015 — Se dokument nr. 752259.
The Act referred to at point 4 of Annex XVI to the Agreement on the European Economic Area laying down the procedures for the award of public contracts in the utilities sector Directive 2004/17/EC shall not apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable the following services to be carried out in Norway:
Dokument nr. 760094, 757507, 758208.
Article 2
Dokument nr. 758924.
This decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Norway.
Dokument nr. 758020, 759785, 759788.
Done at Brussels, 6 July 2015.
Dokument nr. 762175.
For the EFTA Surveillance Authority
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 97/67/EF af 15. december 1997 om fælles regler for udvikling af Fællesskabets indre marked for posttjenester og forbedring af disse tjenesters kvalitet (EFT L 15 af 21.1.1998, s. 14).
College Member
Retsakt, som der henvises til i punkt 5d i bilag XI til EØS-aftalen.
Acting Director
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2002/39/EF af 10. juni 2002 om ændring af direktiv 97/67/EF for så vidt angår yderligere åbning af Fællesskabets marked for posttjenester (EFT L 176 af 5.7.2002, s. 21).
OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p.
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2008/6/EF af 20. februar 2008 om ændring af direktiv 97/67/EF med henblik på fuld realisering af det indre marked for posttjenester i Fællesskabet (EUT L 52 af 27.2.2008, s. 3).
1.
Artikel 30, stk. 2, i direktiv 2004/17/EF.
Received by the Authority on 23 March 2015 — See Document No 752259.
Se også Tilsynsmyndighedens beslutning nr. 189/12/KOL af 22. maj 2012 om undtagelse af produktion og engrossalg af elektricitet i Norge fra anvendelsen af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2004/17/EF om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved indgåelse af kontrakter inden for vand- og energiforsyning, transport samt posttjenester (EUT L 287 af 18.10.2012, s. 21, og EØS-tillæg nr. 58 af 18.10.2012, s. 14).
Document Nos 760094, 757507, 758208.
Kommissionens afgørelse IV/M.1549 af 8. juli 1999 Deutsche Post/ASG, betragtning 10; Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.3155 af 19. juni 2003 Deutsche Post/Securicor, betragtning 8; Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.5152 af 21. april 2009 Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, betragtning 49 til 63, og Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.6570 af 30. januar 2013 UPS/TNT Express, betragtning 156 og 164.
Document No 758924.
Kommissionens gennemførelsesafgørelse 2013/154/EU af 22. marts 2013 om undtagelse af visse tjenester i postsektoren i Ungarn fra anvendelsen af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2004/17/EF om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved indgåelse af kontrakter inden for vand- og energiforsyning, transport samt posttjenester (EUT L 86 af 26.3.2013, s. 22), betragtning 9 og 18; Kommissionens afgørelse 2010/142/EU om undtagelse af visse tjenester i postsektoren i Østrig fra anvendelsen af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2004/17/EF (EUT L 56 af 6.3.2010, s. 8), betragtning 9-14; Kommissionens beslutning 2009/46/EF af 19. december 2008 om undtagelse af visse tjenester i postsektoren i Sverige fra anvendelsen af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2004/17/EF om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved indgåelse af kontrakter inden for vand- og energiforsyning, transport samt posttjenester (EUT L 19 af 23.1.2009, s. 50), betragtning 16-24, og Kommissionens beslutning 2007/564/EF af 6. august 2007 om undtagelse af visse tjenester i postsektoren i Finland, undtagen Ålandsøerne, fra anvendelsen af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2004/17/EF om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved indgåelse af kontrakter inden for vand- og energiforsyning, transport samt posttjenester (EUT L 215 af 18.8.2007, s. 21), betragtning 17-23.
Document Nos 758020, 759785, 759788.
Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.1347 af 23. februar 1999 Deutsche Post/Securicor, betragtning 32-34; Kommissionens afgørelse IV/M.1405 af 15. februar 1999 TNT Post Group/Jet Services, betragtning 29-31; Kommissionens afgørelse IV/M.1513 af 1. juli 1999 Deutsche Post/Danzas/Nedlloyd, betragtning 15-19; Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.1549 af 8. juli 1999 Deutsche Post/ASG, betragtning 15-18; Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.2908 af 21. oktober 2002 Deutsche Post/DHL (II), betragtning 19 og 20; Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.3155 af 19. juni 2003 Deutsche Post/Securicor, betragtning 11; Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.3971 af 24. november 2005 Deutsche Post/Exel, betragtning 31-32; Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.5152 af 21. april 2009, Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, betragtning 64-74; Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.6503 af 4. juli 2012 La Poste/Swiss Post/JV, betragtning 53-56, og Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.6570 af 30. januar 2013 UPS/TNT Express, betragtning 241-243.
Document No 762175.
Kommissionens afgørelse 2013/154/EU, betragtning 19.
Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service (OJ L 15, 21.1.1998, p.
Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.3971 af 24. november 2005 Deutsche Post/Exel, betragtning 25-27.
14).
Se den norske konkurrencemyndigheds holdning af 29. januar 2015 (dokument nr. 746121), s. 4.
Act referred to at point 5d of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement.
Se Posten Norges ansøgning, s. 23.
Directive 2002/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the further opening to competition of Community postal services (OJ L 176, 5.7.2002, p.
EFTA-Tilsynsmyndighedens beslutning nr. 322/10/KOL af 14. juli 2010, Posten Norge/Privpak.
21).
EFTA-Tilsynsmyndighedens beslutning nr. 322/10/KOL af 14. juli 2010, Posten Norge/Privpak, afsnit 12.1.2, betragtning 360.
Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services (OJ L 52, 27.2.2008, p. 3).
Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.5152 af 21. april 2009 Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, betragtning 58-63; Kommissionens beslutning 2009/46/EF, betragtning 17 og 18; samt Kommissionens beslutning 2007/564/EF, betragtning 17 og 18.
Article 30(2) of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Se Posten Norges ansøgning, s. 26.
See also the Authority's Decision No 189/12/COL of 22 May 2012 exempting the production and wholesale of electricity in Norway from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ L 287, 18.10.2012, p. 21 and EEA Supplement No 58, 18.10.2012, p. 14).
Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.6570 af 30. januar 2013 UPS/TNT Express, betragtning 159-164, og Kommissionens afgørelse IV/M.1513 af 1. juli 1999 Deutsche Post/Danzas/Nedlloyd, betragtning 10.
Commission Decision No IV/M.1549 of 8 July 1999 Deutsche Post/ASG, paragraph 10; Commission Decision COMP/M.3155 of 19 June 2003 Deutsche Post/Securicor, paragraph 8; Commission Decision COMP/M.5152 of 21 April 2009 Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, paragraphs 49 to 63; and Commission Decision COMP/M.6570 of 30 January 2013 UPS/TNT Express, paragraphs 156 and 164.
Se Posten Norges ansøgning, s. 25.
Commission Implementing Decision 2013/154/EU of 22 March 2013 exempting certain services in the postal sector in Hungary from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 86, 26.3.2013, p. 22), paragraphs 9 and 18; Commission Decision 2010/142/EU of 3 March 2010 exempting certain services in the postal sector in Austria from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services (OJ L 56, 6.3.2010, p. 8), paragraphs 9 to 14; Commission Decision 2009/46/EC of 19 December 2008 exempting certain services in the postal sector in Sweden from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p.
Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.6570 af 30. januar 2013 UPS/TNT Express, betragtning 165-182, og Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.5152 af 21. april 2009 Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, betragtning 54-74.
50), paragraphs 16 to 24; and Commission Decision 2007/564/EC of 6 August 2007 exempting certain services in the postal sector in Finland from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ L 215, 18.8.2007, p.
Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.5152 af 21. april 2009 Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, betragtning 54-57.
21), paragraphs 17 to 23.
Se også Kommissionens afgørelse 2010/142/EU, betragtning 10 og 11, og Kommissionens gennemførelsesafgørelse 2014/184/EU af 2. april 2014 om undtagelse af visse tjenester i postsektoren i Østrig fra anvendelsen af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2004/17/EF om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved indgåelse af kontrakter inden for vand- og energiforsyning, transport samt posttjenester (EUT L 101 af 4.4.2014, s. 4), betragtning 29, 44 og 45 (om levering af post).
Commission Decision COMP/M.1347 of 23 February 1999 Deutsche Post/Securicor, paragraphs 32 to 34; Commission Decision IV/M.1405 of 15 February 1999 TNT Post Group/Jet Services, paragraphs 29 to 31; Commission Decision IV/M.1513 of 1 July 1999 Deutsche Post/Danzas/Nedlloyd, paragraphs 15 to 19; Commission Decision COMP/M.1549 of 8 July 1999 Deutsche Post/ASG, paragraphs 15 to 18; Commission Decision COMP/M.2908 of 21 October 2002 Deutsche Post/DHL (II), paragraphs 19 and 20; Commission Decision COMP/M.3155 of 19 June 2003 Deutsche Post/Securicor, paragraph 11; Commission Decision COMP/M.3971 of 24 November 2005 Deutsche Post/Exel, paragraphs 31 to 32; Commission Decision COMP/M.5152 of 21 April 2009, Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, paragraphs 64 to 74; Commission Decision COMP/M.6503 of 4 July 2012 La Poste/Swiss Post/JV, paragraphs 53 to 56; and Commission Decision COMP/M.6570 of 30 January 2013 UPS/TNT Express, paragraphs 241 to 243.
Se Posten Norges ansøgning, s. 102-105.
Commission Decision 2013/154/EU, paragraph 19.
Se Posten Norges ansøgning, s. 107 og 115.
Commission Decision COMP/M.3971 of 24 November 2005 Deutsche Post/Exel, paragraphs 25 to 27.
Se den norske konkurrencemyndigheds holdning af 29. januar 2015 (dokument nr. 746121), s. 6.
See the Position of the Norwegian Competition Authority dated 29 January 2015 (Document No 746121), page 4.
Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.5152 af 21. april 2009 Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, betragtning 54-74, og Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.6570 af 30. januar 2013 UPS/TNT Express, betragtning 165-182.
See Norway Post's application, page 23.
Se betragtning 26 ovenfor.
EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 322/10/COL of 14 July 2010, Norway Post/Privpak.
Se Posten Norges ansøgning, s. 119 og 121.
EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 322/10/COL of 14 July 2010, Norway Post/Privpak, section 12.1.2, paragraph 360.
Se Posten Norges ansøgning, s. 53-54.
Commission Decision COMP/M.5152 of 21 April 2009 Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, paragraphs 58 to 63; Commission Decision 2009/46/EC, paragraphs 17 and 18; and Commission Decision No 2007/564/EC, paragraphs 17 and 18.
Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.3971 af 24. november 2005 Deutsche Post/Exel, betragtning 21 og 22; Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.5152 af 21. april 2009 Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, betragtning 50-53; Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.6570 af 30. januar 2013 UPS/TNT Express, betragtning 188-219.
See Norway Post's application, page 26.
Se også Kommissionens gennemførelsesafgørelse 2013/154/EU, betragtning 9; Kommissionens afgørelse 2010/142/EU, betragtning 11; Kommissionens beslutning 2009/46/EF, betragtning 19; og Kommissionens beslutning 2007/564/EF, betragtning 19.
Commission Decision COMP/M.6570 of 30 January 2013 UPS/TNT Express, paragraphs 159 to 164 and Commission Decision IV/M.1513 of 1 July 1999 Deutsche Post/Danzas/Nedlloyd, paragraph 10.
Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.3971 af 24. november 2005 Deutsche Post/Exel, betragtning 21.
See Norway Post's application, page 25.
Kommissionens afgørelse COMP/M.6570 af 30. januar 2013 UPS/TNT Express, betragtning 220-226.
Commission Decision COMP/M.6570 of 30 January 2013 UPS/TNT Express, paragraphs 165 to 182 and Commission Decision COMP/M.5152 of 21 April 2009 Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, paragraphs 54 to 74.
Se Posten Norges ansøgning, s. 134-147.
Commission Decision COMP/M.5152 of 21 April 2009 Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, paragraph 54 to 57.
Se Posten Norges ansøgning, s. 23 og 148.
See also Commission Decision 2010/142/EU, paragraphs 10 and 11 and Implementing Commission Decision 2014/184/EU of 2 April 2014 exempting certain services in the postal sector in Austria from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ L 101, 4.4.2014, p.