natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
er alvorligt bekymret over, at Kommissionen ikke på passende vis har vurderet alle de økonomiske virkninger af præferentielle handelsaftaler (PTA'er), og at det ikke er sikret, at indtægterne indkasseres med det fulde beløb;
Emphasises in this context the significance of introducing national declarations, signed at the appropriate, preferably political, level, and building on annual management declarations (Article 59(5) of the Financial Regulation);
minder om, at det er en topprioritet at oplyse de politiske beslutningstagere, de forskellige aktører og Unionens skattebetalere om de vigtigste former for merværdi og ulemper ved de forskellige handelspolitiske valg og scenarier;
Welcomes the fact that since 2009 the Commission has carried out extensive audits on the spot to review the work of audit authorities; notes that it carried out 269 audit missions and reviewed 47 and 84 Audit Authorities for ERDF and ESF, respectively; notes that the missions covered approximately 96 % and 99 % of the total allocations, respectively; is of the opinion that during a financing period the Commission should audit all operational programmes (OP) at least once;
finder det uacceptabelt, at bæredygtighedsvurderinger (SIA'er) i nogle tilfælde mangler, er ufuldstændige, baseret på gamle eller forældede oplysninger og i andre tilfælde (Chile) først er blevet tilgængelige, efter at aftalen er undertegnet;
Welcomes the Commission's use of payment interruptions and suspensions when errors exceed the 2 % materiality threshold; considers that these are useful instruments to protect the Union's financial interests and is convinced that the Commission should concentrate their own audit efforts on ‘bad performers’;
insisterer derfor på, at den underliggende SIA-undersøgelse skal være udarbejdet og offentliggjort, inden der indgås nogen ny aftale;
Is of the opinion that Member States should supply the Commission with sufficiently detailed information about their audits;
beklager, at parterne under den generelle præferenceordning (GSP-ordning) ikke i alle tilfælde har undertegnet de internationale konventioner om menneskerettigheder og arbejdstagerrettigheder; opfordrer Kommissionen til at lægge større vægt på miljø og god regeringsførelse i PTA'er;
Supports the Court of Auditors' recommendation that the Commission should take appropriate measures so that audit authorities can draw on a stable and binding methodological framework which ensures that Union spending in all Member States is checked according to the same standards and that the results are reported accurately;
ønsker at blive underrettet om foranstaltninger, der træffes af Kommissionen på grundlag af Parlamentets og Revisionsrettens anbefalinger, henstillinger og bemærkninger, inden oktober 2015;
Notes with satisfaction that the Commission presented on 13 December 2013 a communication on the application of net financial corrections on Member States for Agriculture and Cohesion Policy (COM(2013) 934); emphasises however that it will depend on many factors whether the new instrument will lead to more net corrections and hence to a lower error rate in cohesion policy;
mener, at Kommissionen med henblik på at forbedre vurderingen af de økonomiske virkninger af PTA'erne bør:
Calls on the Court of Auditors and the Commission to develop an audit instrument which, on the one hand, records annually errors and irregularities while, on the other hand, also takes into consideration financial correction during the programming period;
gennemføre en konsekvensanalyse og en SIA for hver enkel PTA for at få en dybdegående, dækkende og kvantificeret analyse af de forventede økonomiske virkninger, herunder et præcist skøn over udeblevne indtægter;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has updated the roadmap for the implementation and monitoring of the correct implementation of the ‘single audit’ principle in September 2013, compliance with which should put national authorities in a position to obtain the ‘single audit status’; requests a copy of this document;
rutinemæssigt inddrage Eurostat i kvalitetsvurderingen af de statistiske datakilder, der anvendes i SIA'er, og sikre, at der rettidigt gennemføres analyser til brug for de personer, der skal forhandle aftalerne;
Is sensitive to the idea that control of expenditure could represent an administrative burden; considers that the obligation of accountability must not discourage potential beneficiaries from applying for financial assistance;
gennemføre interimsevalueringer og efterfølgende evalueringer af alle PTA'er for at vurdere, i hvilket omfang PTA'er med væsentlige virkninger opfylder politikmålene, og hvordan deres resultater kan forbedres i centrale sektorer, herunder et skøn over udeblevne indtægter;
Part V
opfordrer Kommissionen med henblik på at øge beskyttelsen af Unionens finansielle interesser til at:
Special Report No 17/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU Climate Finance in the context of External Aid’
opstille EU-risikoprofiler for PTA'er, så medlemsstaterne har en fælles tilgang til risikoanalyse med henblik på at reducere tabene for Unionens budget
Welcomes the special report examining Union climate finance in the context of external aid as an important contribution to the overall political and financial debate about the Union's climate policy and diplomacy; takes note of the findings, conclusions and recommendations and sets out its observations and recommendations below;
kontrollere, at medlemsstaterne gør deres risikoforvaltningssystemer og kontrolstrategi mere effektive for at reducere tabene for Unionens budget
Welcomes the findings of the report which show that the Commission has managed Union climate-related spending from the Union budget and the European Development Funds (EDF) well;
tilskynde medlemsstaterne til at vedtage hensigtsmæssige retsbevarende foranstaltninger, når de modtager en meddelelse om gensidig bistand
Welcomes also the work begun by the Commission and Member States on a common Union standard for monitoring, reporting and verification of public climate finance;
evaluere og foretage risikobaserede overvågningsbesøg til lande, som er berettigede til præferencebehandling, navnlig for så vidt angår reglerne vedrørende oprindelse og kumulation
Reiterates Parliament's position, of which the Court of Auditors took note in its special report, which insists that climate finance should be additional to the 0,7 % target; regrets the failure to confirm Parliament's concept of additionality in the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) negotiations;
forpligte medlemsstaterne til at forbedre kvaliteten af de oplysninger, som de forelægger i forbindelse med administrativt samarbejde
Points out however that there is a need for the Commission to exercise sufficient leadership to maximise its international impact and to consolidate the tools for shaping conditions for the Union's climate/green diplomacy in future years, in particular to deliver the climate-related benchmarks within the DCI as adopted in December 2013, stating that it ‘should contribute to the overall objective of addressing at least 20 % of the Union budget to low carbon and climate resilient society, and that GPGC should use at least 25 % of its funds to cover climate change and environment (Recital 20 of the DCI)’; points out that Annex IV to the DCI also specifies that under the Global Public Goods and Challenges (GPGC) programme, 27 % of the funds are allocated to Environment and Climate Change and at least 50 % of the GPGC programme will serve for climate related action and environment-related objectives;
forbedre den finansielle opfølgning af undersøgelserne, der foretages af Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) for at forhindre tab for Unionens budget på grund af forældelse
Welcomes the fact that a commitment to improving EU Joint Programming since 2011 has been made in some 40 countries; points out however that coordination between the Commission and Member States in climate finance for developing countries still needs to be improved considerably to not only meet the 2020 commitment but to also allow the Union to stay a frontrunner in terms of climate actions and to combat corruption in developing countries;
styrke Unionens position i de gensidige PTA'er og i højere grad at gøre brug af retsbevarende foranstaltninger og sikkerhedsforanstaltninger ved at inkludere dem i alle fremtidige handelsaftaler
Reiterates Parliament's support for joint programming and its recognition of the significant progress made on this; looks forward to being re-consulted, as promised by the Commission, if such programming leads to changes in the DCI programming;
forelægge en oversigt over efteropkrævninger, der er foretaget i perioden 2010-2014 snarest muligt
Notes the explanations about the difficulties in tracking and reporting due to the divergent reporting practices of Member States given in the Accountability Report from the Commission on Financing for Development, published on 3 July 2014 in the form of a Staff Working Paper, including a section in Volume I on Climate Finance which provides information on Union climate financing; notes that the report repeats the figure of EUR 7,3 billion of Fast Start Finance made available by the Union and Member States, and urges further improvements in reporting on the impact and results of development aid;
informere Parlamentet om resultaterne af Compact-initiativet i Bangladesh;
Future developments
Del IX
Calls for more earmarking of funds to specific sectors, including climate finance when channelled via Budget Support, and more transparency over the use of funds overall;
Revisionsrettens særberetning nr. 3/2014 med titlen »Erfaringer fra Kommissionens udvikling af anden generation af Schengeninformationssystemet (SIS II)«
Considers that the Commission and the EEAS should strengthen their communication policy, both on the support provided globally or to individual recipient countries and to project the Union's values;
påskønner Den Europæiske Revisionsrets konklusioner og anbefalinger i særberetning nr. 3/2014;
Recognises that corruption remains a significant barrier to effective climate finance and urges the Commission to step up its efforts in regards to working with development partners on anti-corruption issues;
finder det kritisabelt, at Kommissionen ikke fra starten afsatte tilstrækkeligt med ekspertpersonale til projektet, hverken hvad angik den tekniske implementering eller i forbindelse med kvalitetsevalueringen af SIS II-projektet;
Requests that the Commission propose a road map to the Council for the scaling-up of climate finance towards the Copenhagen Accord 2020 target, including a definition of private finance;
henstiller, at alle større IT-projekter integreres i IT-forvaltningsproceduren, og at man ud over ekstern ekspertise også inddrager eksperter fra såvel Kommissionens Generaldirektoratet for Informationsteknologi som andre generaldirektorater for i højere grad at udnytte den interne ekspertviden;
Requests that the Commission make an independent evaluation of the Global Climate Change Alliance, including an examination of why most Member States did not choose to co-finance it;
henstiller, at der i forbindelse med ethvert større projekt nedsættes et ekspertpanel bestående af repræsentanter for de medlemsstater, der står for projektet, således at Kommissionen lige fra projektets begyndelse får gavn af medlemsstaternes ekspertise; mener, at panelets opgaver og dets medlemmers beføjelser bør defineres klart;
Asks the Commission and the EEAS to report on the extent to which the target of spending 20 % of the Union budget and the EDF over 2014 to 2020 on climate related action is implemented in development aid, specifying what has been committed and disbursed;
finder det kritisabelt, at hverken Kommissionen, som bl.a. skulle repræsentere SIS II-slutbrugernes interesser, eller hovedaktørerne overhovedet var bekendt med de tekniske krav og slutbrugernes krav ved projektets begyndelse;
Calls on the Commission and Member States, in the framework of Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [11] (Monitoring Mechanism Regulation), to agree common standards for monitoring, reporting and verification, in particular with respect to the definition of ‘new and additional’, the application of the Rio Markers and reporting on the disbursement of climate finance;
forventer, at Kommissionen i forbindelse med fremtidige projekter i samarbejde med medlemsstaterne fra projektets begyndelse fastlægger en nøjagtig profil af de tekniske krav og slutbrugerkrav, som skal opfyldes;
Invites the Commission and Member States to intensify their cooperation to implement the EU Code of Conduct on Division of Labour in the field of climate finance, notably with respect to the exchange of information on allocations by countries, joint programming and preventing and combatting corruption in climate finance;
anser det for spild af skatteydernes penge, at Kommissionen offentliggjorde en general indkaldelse af forslag til projektet uden at have præciseret de krav, der skulle opfyldes i forbindelse hermed;
Part VI
henstiller, at Kommissionen udarbejder en realistisk arbejds- og tidsplan for fremtidige IT-projekter baseret på veldefinerede krav til form og indhold og en klar analyse af omkostninger og tidsforbrug under hensyntagen til projektets risici og kompleksitet;
Special Report No 18/2013 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The reliability of the results of the Member States' checks of the agricultural expenditure’
finder det kritisabelt, at Kommissionen flere gange har forsøgt at dække over forsinkelserne og de øgede omkostninger;
Acknowledges that the systems examined in the Special Report No 18/2013 have been changed by the new CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) regulations, with increased responsibilities given to the certification bodies in the Member States in the field of the verification of legality and regularity of expenditure and the verification of control results communicated to the Commission;
kræver størst mulig gennemsigtighed i fremtidige IT-projekter i form af en løbende informationsudveksling med Parlamentets relevante kompetente udvalg, især når det drejer sig om afgørende beslutninger, der udløser fortløbende projektfaser eller medfører uforudsete ændringer i omkostninger eller tidsplan eller alternative løsninger;
Welcomes the ongoing efforts of the Commission for the simplification of CAP; expects that the simplification of eligibility criteria leads to the simplification of control rules and can contribute towards a lower error rate;
er af den opfattelse, at muligheden for at gøre erstatningskrav gældende ikke burde have været begrænset i kontrakten med hovedkontrahenten; mener, at fremtidige kontrakter bør have en effektiv bødemekanisme for at sikre rettidig levering i henhold til de krævede standarder;
Reminds the Commission to ensure that the problems encountered are not repeated; recalls that the Court of Auditors' findings in its 2012 Annual Report were as follows:
finder det kritisabelt, at Kommissionen ikke opsagde kontrakten med hovedkontrahenten på trods af de dårlige resultater, der blev leveret i den første projektfase;
that the supervisory and control systems of the Member States for expense payments and for rural development were partially effective and that for a significant number of transactions affected by error, the national authorities had enough information to detect and correct the errors concerned;
finder det kritisabelt, at Kommissionen ikke har insisteret på et komponentbaseret udviklingssystem til implementering af SIS II; mener, at hvis udviklingsarbejdet havde været opdelt i sammenkoblelige blokke, kunne hele elementer være blevet overdraget til en anden kontrahent, hvorved bindingen til en bestemt kontrahent ville være undgået;
that the effectiveness of the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) is adversely affected, mainly by inaccurate databases used for cross-checks;
finder det kritisabelt, at Kommissionen har overskredet værdien af den oprindelige kontrakt med 800 % ved at genforhandle den, selv om artikel 126, stk. 1, litra e), i Kommissionens forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 2342/2002 [13], foreskriver, at værdien af en kontrakt ikke må overskride sin oprindelige værdi med mere end 50 %;
Stresses that on 3 April 2014, Parliament endorsed the reservation of the Director-General of DG AGRI in its Annual Activity Report for 2012 as regards the deficiencies found by the Commission and the Court of Auditors in the eligibility of land; reiterates that Parliament asked, in particular, that permanent pasture should be properly recorded in the land parcel identification system (LPIS) and that it should be informed by the Commission on a 6-month basis on progress made;
bemærker i den forbindelse, at artikel 134, stk. 1, litra b), i Kommissionens delegerede forordning (EU) nr. 1268/2012 [14] muligvis bør revideres, idet de tekniske eller kunstneriske årsager, der binder de ordregivende myndigheder til en bestemt kontrahent eller agent, ikke bør bruges til at omgå beskyttelsesbestemmelsen i litra e), i det samme stykke og gøre det muligt at mangedoble hovedkontraktens oprindelige værdi i urimeligt omfang;
Asks the Commission and the Member States to take immediate remedial action when administrative and control systems, and/or IACS databases, are found to be deficient or out of date;
bemærker, at der i tilfælde af en væsentlig mangedobling af et projekts oprindelige omkostninger eller større ændringer hvad angår de forventede fordele, risici eller alternative løsninger bør være et krav om forhåndsgodkendelse fra budgetmyndighedens side;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that payments are based on inspection results and that those inspections are of the necessary quality to determine eligible areas in a reliable and consistent manner;
beklager, at budgetmidler i flere tilfælde er blevet omfordelt uden budgetmyndighedens godkendelse;
Urges the Commission to ensure that the design and quality of the work performed by the paying agencies and the certification bodies provide a reliable basis for the assessment of the legality and regularity of underlying transactions; maintains that in order to achieve this, the Commission should work towards the goal of a single audit strategy for the CAP control system;
påskønner retningslinjerne for projektstyring, som Kommissionens Generaldirektorat for Informationsteknologi har anbefalet siden 2011; mener, at projektstyringsudvalget i henhold til disse retningslinjer skal godkende iværksættelsen af de næste projektfaser gennem såkaldte godkendelsesporte (»approval gates«);
Welcomes the change in the approach used by DG AGRI to calculate the residual error rate for decoupled area aid in 2012, as it takes into account the fact that the inspection statistics, the declarations of the directors of paying agencies and the work carried out by the certification bodies can be affected by deficiencies impacting their reliability; calls for this new approach to extend to all CAP expenditure in DG AGRI's Annual Activity Reports in the new funding period;
fremhæver nødvendigheden af at se fremad, eftersom SIS II ved udgangen af indeværende årti kan være udtjent, og der vil blive behov for et SIS III; håber i den forbindelse, at forberedelserne til SIS III vil blive væsentlig bedre udført;
Reminds the Commission that it has endorsed the reservation contained in DG AGRI's annual activity report for the total EAFRD expenditure for 2012 and that this reservation is due to concerns about the quality of controls in some Member States, as well as the error rate reported by the Court of Auditors;
Del X
Calls on the Member States to carry out their existing administrative checks in an efficient way by using all relevant information available to the paying agencies, as this has the potential to detect and correct the majority of the errors;
Revisionsrettens særberetning nr. 4/2014 med titlen »Integrationen af EU's vandpolitiske mål i den fælles landbrugspolitik: en delvis succes«
Calls on the Commission and Member States to focus on the cost-efficiency of controls as an area of importance, specifically by further developing the use of risk-based controls;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at foreslå EU-lovgiveren de nødvendige ændringer af de nuværende instrumenter (krydsoverensstemmelse og udvikling af landdistrikterne) med henblik på at sikre overholdelse af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2000/60/EF [15] (vandrammedirektivet, VRD) eller, i givet fald, nye instrumenter, der kan opfylde de mere ambitiøse mål med hensyn til integration af vandpolitiske mål i den fælles landbrugspolitik;
Calls on the Commission to ensure in the area of rural development that uniform standards and procedures are being equally applied and observed, both by its approving and auditing bodies;
opfordrer medlemsstaterne til i overensstemmelse med VRD at:
Part VII
afhjælpe de svagheder i udførelsen af krydsoverensstemmelseskontroller, som blev identificeret ved revisionen
Special Report No 1/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Effectiveness of EU-supported public urban transport projects’
pålægge systematisk passende sanktioner i tilfælde af overtrædelse
Emphasises that the European Structural and Investment Funds (‘ESI funds’) are the single most important source for Union funding for urban mobility projects and that such projects are not only crucial for the accessibility of urban areas in the Union's less developed regions but that they also have important social and environmental aspects for the quality of life of Union citizens;
lægge mere vægt på at identificere og behandle vandrelaterede problemer via deres programmer for udvikling af landdistrikter og at sikre, at de er i overensstemmelse med vandområdeplanerne
Stresses the increasing importance of continued Union financial assistance, considering in particular the negative consequences of growing urban sprawl and the prospect of the further steady growth of the urban population;
etablere beskyttelsesordninger og sørge for, at de overholdes strengt, så man undgår, at aktiviteter finansieret med midler til udvikling af landdistrikterne har negative virkninger for vandressourcerne
Stresses the need to ensure that the delivery of urban mobility projects both by the Commission and Member States must therefore be responsible, effective and efficient, pursuing concrete results rather than the absorption of the available funds;
aktivt overveje, hvordan midler, der er øremærket til vandrelaterede spørgsmål, bedst kan anvendes og fremme hensigtsmæssig anvendelse af sådanne midler, i overensstemmelse med principperne for forsvarlig økonomisk forvaltning;
Reiterates, while mindful of the principle of subsidiarity, the call on Member States made in the Commission's communication of 17 December 2013 entitled ‘Together towards competitive and resource-efficient urban mobility’ (COM(2013) 913):
forventer, at Kommissionen foreslår hensigtsmæssige mekanismer, der effektivt kan påvirke kvaliteten af medlemsstaternes programmeringsdokumenter i forbindelse med VRD i en meget positiv retning og hindre, at den tidsplan, der er fastsat i VRD, fraviges; mener, at der for eksempel bør fastsættes minimumsbetingelser med hensyn til gennemførelsen af VRD, som skal være opfyldt, før der afsættes midler til udvikling af landdistrikterne;
to ensure the detailed assessments of the present and future performance, the coordination and the integration of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) into wider urban and territorial strategies, amending, where necessary, technical and other tools at the disposal of planning authorities;
opfordrer medlemsstaterne til hurtigst muligt at fremskynde gennemførelsesprocessen for VRD og forbedre deres vandområdeplaner for den næste forvaltningscyklus (2015) ved at beskrive de enkelte foranstaltninger (f.eks. med hensyn til omfang, tidsplan, mål og omkostninger) og sikre, at de er tilstrækkeligt klare og konkrete på operationelt og ned til lokalt plan/bedriftsplan;
to focus on appropriate vehicles in addition to infrastructure as a tool to deliver sustainable urban mobility in urban logistics;