natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvis standardafvigelsen for de resterende Cd-værdier er mindre end eller lig med 0,3 % af gennemsnittet af den resterende Cd, anvendes denne gennemsnitlige Cd i ligningen (7-120), og kun CFV-værdier ned til det laveste r forbundet med de resterende Cd anvendes.
‘3.9.5.
Hvis standardafvigelsen for de resterende Cd stadig overstiger 0,3 % af gennemsnittet af de resterende Cd-værdier, gentages trinnene i dette punkts litra d) til g).«
CFV calibration
I tillæg 6 affattes ligning (7-180) således:
Some CFV flow meters consist of a single venturi and some consist of multiple venturis, where different combinations of venturis are used to meter different flow rates.
»cNH3 = (0,1 × cNH3,cold) + (0,9 × cNH3,hot)
For CFV flow meters that consist of multiple venturis, either calibration of each venturi independently to determine a separate discharge coefficient, Cd, for each venturi, or calibration of each combination of venturis as one venturi may be performed.
(7-180)«.
In the case where a combination of venturis is calibrated, the sum of the active venturi throat areas is used as At, the square root of the sum of the squares of the active venturi throat diameters as dt, and the ratio of the venturi throat to inlet diameters is the ratio of the square root of the sum of the active venturi throat diameters (dt) to the diameter of the common entrance to all of the venturis (D).
BILAG XVIII
To determine the Cd for a single venturi or a single combination of venturis, the following steps shall be performed:
I bilag VIII til delegeret forordning (EU) 2017/654 foretages følgende berigtigelser:
With the data collected at each calibration set point an individual Cd for each point shall be calculated using equation (7-140);
I punkt 4.6 [vedrører ikke den danske udgave].
The mean and standard deviation of all the Cd values shall be calculated in accordance with equations (7-155) and (7-156);
I tillæg 2, punkt 4, tredje afsnit, affattes sidste punktum således:
If the standard deviation of all the Cd values is less than or equal to 0,3 % of the mean Cd, then the mean Cd shall be used in equation (7-120), and the CFV shall be used only down to the lowest r measured during calibration;
Konditioner motor
If the number of remaining Cd values is seven or greater, the mean and standard deviation of the remaining Cd values shall be recalculated;
Hvis transient cyklus og stationær cyklus anvendes
If the standard deviation of the remaining Cd values is less than or equal to 0,3 % of the mean of the remaining Cd, that mean Cd shall be used in equation (7-120) and the CFV values only down to the lowest r associated with the remaining Cd shall be used;
LSI-NRTC
‘cNH3 = (0,1 × cNH3,cold) + (0,9 × cNH3,hot)
Henstand ved fordampning
(7-180)’.
Formand
in Appendix 2, in point 4., in the third paragraph below the heading, the last sentence is replaced by the following:
Følgende indsættes som punkt 3.1:
‘This shall be compensated via one of the methods described in point 7’.
er MTS = ni
In the absence of either a standard from the European Committee for Standardization (“CEN standard”) for non-road gas-oil or a table of fuel properties for non-road gas-oil in Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the diesel (non-road gas-oil) reference fuel in Annex IX shall represent market non-road gas-oils with a sulphur content not greater than 10 mg/kg, cetane number not less than 45 and a fatty-acid methyl ester ( “FAME”) content not greater than 8,0 % v/v. Except where otherwise permitted in accordance with points 1.2.2.1, 1.2.3 and 1.2.4, the manufacturer shall make a corresponding declaration to the end-users in accordance with the requirements in Annex XV that operation of the engine on non-road gas-oil is limited to those fuels with a sulphur content not greater than 10 mg/kg (20 mg/kg at point of final distribution) cetane number not less than 45 and a FAME content not greater than 8,0 % v/v. The manufacturer may optionally specify other parameters (e.g. for lubricity).
Konditionering og opvarmning af motor
PCD engine family 1
q mf2
Pre-condition engine
er brændstoffets oxygenindhold, massebrøk [g/g] eller [% massefylde]
If transient cycle and steady state cycle are applied
idet der henvises til brændstoffet CΗαΟεΝδSγ«.
Run one or more practice cycle as necessary to check engine/test Define steady-state test cycle
Kommissionens delegerede forordning (EU) 2018/990
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/990
om ændring af og supplerende regler til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) 2017/1131 for så vidt angår simple, transparente og standardiserede (STS) securitiseringer og gældsbreve med sikkerhed i konkrete aktiver (ABCP'er), krav til aktiver, der modtages som led i omvendte genkøbsaftaler, og kreditkvalitetsvurderingsmetoder
amending and supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1131 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to simple, transparent and standardised (STS) securitisations and asset-backed commercial papers (ABCPs), requirements for assets received as part of reverse repurchase agreements and credit quality assessment methodologies
under henvisning til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) 2017/1131 af 14. juni 2017 om pengemarkedsforeninger, særlig artikel 11, stk. 4, artikel 15, stk. 7, og artikel 22, og
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/1131 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on money market funds, and in particular Articles 11(4), 15(7) and 22 thereof,
Artikel 11, stk. 1, i forordning (EU) 2017/1131 giver pengemarkedsforeninger mulighed for at investere i securitiseringer eller gældsbreve med sikkerhed i konkrete aktiver (i det følgende benævnt »ABCP'er«).
Article 11(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1131 allows MMFs to invest in securitisations or asset-backed commercial papers (ABCPs).
Der findes et særligt incitament til at investere i simple, transparente og standardiserede (STS) securitiseringer eller ABCP'er.
A specific incentive is in place to invest in simple, transparent and standardised (STS) securitisations or ABCPs.
Eftersom Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) 2017/2402 allerede indeholder krav til STS-securitiseringer og STS-ABCP'er, er det nødvendigt at ændre forordning (EU) 2017/1131, således at der kan krydshenvises til de bestemmelser i forordning (EU) 2017/2402, der indeholder disse krav.
Since Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council already contains requirements for STS securitisations and ABCPs, Regulation (EU) 2017/1131 needs to be amended to cross-refer to the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 that contain those requirements.
Omvendte genkøbsaftaler gør det muligt for pengemarkedsforeninger at gennemføre deres investeringsstrategi og mål i henhold til bestemmelserne i forordning (EU) 2017/1131.
Reverse repurchase agreements enable MMFs to implement their investment strategy and objectives according to the terms of Regulation (EU) 2017/1131.
I henhold til nævnte forordning skal modparten i en omvendt genkøbsaftale være kreditværdig, og aktiver, der er modtaget som sikkerhedsstillelse, skal være tilstrækkelig likvide og af så høj kvalitet, at pengemarkedsforeninger kan nå deres mål og opfylde deres forpligtelser, hvis det skulle blive nødvendigt at realisere disse aktiver.
That Regulation requires that the counterparty to a reverse repurchase agreement be creditworthy and that the assets received as collateral be of sufficient liquidity and quality to enable MMFs to achieve their objectives and fulfil their obligations should such assets need to be liquidated.
Standardaftaler, der anvendes til omvendte genkøbsaftaler, kan bidrage til målet om at styre modpartsrisiko.
The standard agreements used for reverse repurchase agreements may contribute to the goal of managing counterparty risk.
Dog kan visse bestemmelser gøre de aktiver, der ligger til grund for omvendte genkøbsaftaler, utilgængelige for forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger og dermed illikvide.
However, certain clauses may make the assets underlying reverse repurchase agreements unavailable to managers of MMFs and therefore illiquid.
Det er derfor nødvendigt at sikre, at aktiverne er tilgængelige for forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger i tilfælde af misligholdelse eller i tilfælde af opsigelse før tid af omvendte genkøbsaftaler, og at modparten ikke begrænser salget af aktiverne ved at kræve forudgående varsel eller godkendelse.
It is therefore necessary to ensure that the assets are available to managers of MMFs in case of default or in case of early termination of reverse repurchase agreements, and that the counterparty does not limit the sale of the assets by requiring prior notice or approval.
Forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger bør ikke være forpligtet til at anvende en særlig justering af værdien af et aktiv (haircut), hvis modparten i en omvendt genkøbsaftale er underkastet tilsynsregler i henhold til EU-retten.
Managers of MMFs should not be obliged to apply a specific adjustment to the value of an asset (a haircut) if the counterparty to a reverse repurchase agreement is subject to prudential rules under Union law.
For at sikre, at sikkerhedsstillelsen i forbindelse med omvendte genkøbsaftaler er af høj kvalitet, skal forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger anvende yderligere krav, hvis modparten i en aftale ikke er reguleret i henhold til EU-retten eller ikke er anerkendt som ækvivalent.
To ensure that the collateral provided under reverse repurchase agreements is of high quality, managers of MMFs shall apply additional requirements when the counterparty to an agreement is not regulated under Union law or is not recognised as equivalent.
For at sikre konsistens i EU-retten bør minimumskravene til haircuts være de samme som de tilsvarende krav i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 575/2013.
To ensure consistency across Union law, the minimum requirements for haircuts should be the same as the corresponding requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger bør kunne anvende et større haircut end det minimum, der er fastsat i forordning (EU) nr. 575/2013, hvis de finder det nødvendigt at sikre, at den sikkerhedsstillelse, der er modtaget som led i omvendte genkøbsaftaler, er tilstrækkelig likvid, hvis markedsbetingelserne kræver det.
Managers of MMFs should be able to apply a higher haircut than the minimum laid down in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 where they consider it necessary to ensure that the collateral received as part of reverse repurchase agreements is sufficiently liquid, if the market conditions so require.
De bør også overvåge og revidere størrelsen af det haircut, der kræves for at sikre et passende likviditetsniveau, navnlig når størrelsen af det haircut, der er fastsat i artikel 224, stk. 1, i forordning (EU) nr. 575/2013 revideres, eller restløbetiden for aktiver eller andre faktorer i relation til modpartens levedygtighed har ændret sig.
They should also monitor and revise the amount of the haircut requested to ensure an appropriate level of liquidity, in particular when the amount of the haircut stipulated in Article 224(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 is revised, or the remaining maturity of assets or other factors related to the viability of the counterparty have changed.
De kreditkvalitetsvurderingsmetoder, der er omhandlet i artikel 19, stk. 3, bør være forsigtige nok til at sikre, at alle kvalitative og kvantitative kriterier til støtte for kreditkvalitetsvurderinger er pålidelige og hensigtsmæssige til korrekt vurdering af kreditkvaliteten af investerbare instrumenter.
The credit quality assessment methodologies referred to in Article 19(3) should be prudent enough to ensure that all qualitative and quantitative criteria supporting credit quality assessments are reliable and appropriate for properly assessing the credit quality of instruments eligible for investment.
Derudover bør det sikres, at de makro- og mikroøkonomiske faktorer, som forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger tager hensyn til i en kreditkvalitetsvurdering, er relevante for bedømmelse af kreditkvaliteten af en emittent eller et investerbart instrument.
In addition, it should be ensured that the macroeconomic and microeconomic factors managers of MMFs take into consideration in a credit quality assessment are relevant for determining the credit quality of an issuer or of an instrument eligible for investment.
For at sikre, at de instrumenter, som forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger har til hensigt at investere i, er af tilstrækkelig god kvalitet, bør disse forvaltere foretage en kreditkvalitetsvurdering, hver gang de har til hensigt at foretage en investering.
To ensure that the instruments managers of MMFs intend to invest in are of sufficient quality, the managers of MMFs should carry out a credit quality assessment every time they intend to make an investment.
For at undgå omgåelse af kravet i forordning (EU) 2017/1131 om, at forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger kun må investere i instrumenter, der har fået en positiv kreditkvalitetsvurdering, bør forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger som led i kreditkvalitetsvurderingsmetoden klart fastsætte kriterierne for en positiv vurdering af instrumenter, som er investerbare for pengemarkedsforeninger, inden de foretager den faktiske kreditkvalitetsvurdering.
To avoid circumvention of the requirement in Regulation (EU) 2017/1131 that the managers of MMFs only invest in instruments that have received a favourable credit quality assessment, managers of MMF should clearly establish, as part of the credit quality methodology, the criteria for a favourable assessment of instruments eligible for MMF investment, before carrying out the actual credit quality assessment.
Den metode og de kriterier, der anvendes til kreditkvalitetsvurderinger, bør være ensartede, medmindre der er en objektiv grund til at afvige fra denne metode eller disse kriterier.
The methodology and criteria used for credit quality assessments should be consistent, except where there is an objective reason for diverging from the methodology or the criteria.
Der bør udvikles kriterier og metoder, der kan anvendes gentagne gange, og ikke kun til en bestemt sag på et bestemt tidspunkt.
The criteria and the methodology should be developed for recurrent use, not solely for a particular case at a specific moment in time.
Den ensartede brug af kriterierne og metoden bør gøre det lettere at overvåge kreditkvalitetsvurderingen.
The consistent use of the criteria and of the methodology should make it easier to monitor the credit quality assessment.
For at sikre korrekt kvantificering af emittentens kreditrisiko og den relative risiko for misligholdelse fra emittentens eller instrumentet side, jf. artikel 20, stk. 2, litra a), i forordning (EU) 2017/1131, bør forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger anvende de relevante kvantitative kriterier, der er tilgængelige på markedet.
To ensure the correct quantification of the credit risk of the issuer, and the relative risk of default of the issuer and of the instrument, as required under Article 20(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1131, managers of MMFs should use the relevant quantitative criteria that are available on the market.
Dog bør de ikke forhindres i at anvende supplerende faktorer, hvis det er relevant.
However, they should not be prevented from using additional factors, if relevant.
Kreditkvalitetsvurderingen af emittenten er en af de vigtigste vurderinger, da den udgør det første lag i garantien for aktivers kvalitet.
The credit quality assessment of the issuer is one of the most important assessments to carry out, as it provides the first layer of guarantee of the quality of assets.
Forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger bør derfor så vidt muligt tage hensyn til alle de faktorer, der er relevante for en vurdering af de kvalitative og kvantitative kreditrisikokriterier for en emittent af et instrument.
Insofar as is possible, managers of MMFs should therefore take into account all factors that are relevant for assessing qualitative and quantitative credit risk criteria for an issuer of an instrument.
Under særlige omstændigheder, navnlig under pressede markedsforhold, bør forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger kunne træffe investeringsbeslutninger, der tilsidesætter resultatet af en kreditkvalitetsvurdering, hvis sådanne investeringsbeslutninger er i investorernes interesse, og forudsat at disse beslutninger er begrundede og behørigt dokumenterede.
In exceptional circumstances, in particular under stressed market conditions, managers of MMFs should be able to take investment decisions that override the result of a credit quality assessment if such investment decisions are in the interests of investors, provided those decisions are justified and properly documented.
Da instrumenternes kvalitet kan variere over tid, bør kreditkvalitetsvurderingen ikke være en engangsrisikovurdering, men bør snarere foretages løbende.
As the quality of instruments may vary over time, the credit quality assessment should not be a once-off assessment, rather it should be carried out continually.
Den bør desuden revideres, navnlig hvis der er sket en væsentlig ændring, som omhandlet i artikel 19, stk. 4, litra d), i forordning (EU) 2017/1131, i det makro- og mikroøkonomiske miljø, der kan påvirke den eksisterende kreditkvalitetsvurdering af instrumentet.
In addition, it should be revised, in particular, when there is a material change, as referred to in Article 19(4)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1131, in the macroeconomic or microeconomic environment that could have an impact on the existing credit quality assessment of the instrument.
Forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger bør ikke mekanisk forlade sig for meget på eksterne kreditvurderinger.
Managers of MMFs should not mechanistically over-rely on external credit ratings.
Et kreditvurderingsbureaus nedjustering af kreditvurderingen eller vurderingsforventningen for en emittent eller et instrument bør derfor kun betragtes som en væsentlig ændring, hvis den er blevet vurderet og vejet op mod andre kriterier.
The downgrading by a credit rating agency of the credit rating or rating outlook given to an issuer or an the instrument should therefore only be considered a material change if it has been assessed and put in the balance with other criteria.
Derfor bør forvaltere fortsat være forpligtet til at foretage deres egen vurdering, også selv om der finder en sådan nedjustering sted.
For this reason, managers should still be required to carry out their own assessment even where such downgrading takes place.
Sikkerhedsstillelsen i forbindelse med omvendte genkøbsaftaler bør være af høj kvalitet og ikke vise en høj grad af korrelation med modpartens resultater.
The collateral provided as part of reverse repurchase agreements should be of high quality and not display a high correlation with the performance of the counterparty.
Kreditkvalitetsvurderingen bør derfor være positiv.
Its credit quality assessment should therefore be favourable.
Da der ikke er nogen grund til at sondre mellem de vurderinger, som forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger foretager, når de investerer direkte i investerbare aktiver, og den vurdering, de foretager, når de modtager et aktiv som sikkerhed, bør kreditkvalitetsvurderingen i begge tilfælde være baseret på de samme kriterier.
As there is no reason to differentiate between the assessments managers of MMFs carry out when investing directly in eligible assets and the assessment they carry out when they receive an asset as collateral, the credit quality assessment should be based on the same criteria in both cases.
Ved forordning (EU) 2017/1131 tillægges Kommissionen tre beføjelser til at præcisere og ændre visse bestemmelser i nævnte forordning.
Regulation (EU) 2017/1131 contains three empowerments for the Commission to specify and amend certain provisions laid down in that Regulation.
Disse beføjelser forfølger samme mål om at sikre, at pengemarkedsforeninger investerer i investerbare aktiver.
Those empowerments have the same aim of ensuring that MMFs are invested in appropriate eligible assets.
For at sikre konsekvens og sammenhæng i disse krav og give de personer, som er underlagt kravene, et overblik over og et enkelt adgangspunkt til dem, bør disse krav samles i en enkelt forordning.
To ensure the coherence and consistency of those requirements and to give the people subject to them an overview and a single point of access to them, those requirements should be put in a single regulation.
Denne delegerede forordning bør anvendes fra samme dato som forordning (EU) 2017/1131 for at sikre, at alle gældende regler og krav til pengemarkedsforeninger anvendes fra samme dato.
The date of application of this delegated Regulation should be aligned with the date of application of Regulation (EU) 2017/1131 to ensure that all rules and requirements apply to MMFs from the same date.
Den ændrede bestemmelse, der krydshenviser til kriterierne for STS-securitiseringer og STS-ABCP'er, bør anvendes fra samme dato som forordning (EU) 2017/2402 —
The date of application of the amending provision cross-referring to the criteria for STS securitisations and ABCPS should be the same as the date of application of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402,
KRITERIER FOR OPRETTELSE AF STS-SECURITISERING ELLER STS-ABCP
CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING A SIMPLE, TRANSPARENT AND STANDARDISED (STS) SECURITISATION OR ASSET-BACKED COMMERCIAL PAPER (ABCP)
(artikel 15, stk. 7, i forordning (EU) 2017/1131)
(Article 15(7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1131)
Ændring af forordning (EU) 2017/1131
Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2017/1131
Artikel 11, stk. 1, litra c), i forordning (EU) 2017/1131 affattes således:
In Article 11(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1131, point (c) is replaced by the following:
en simpel, transparent og standardiseret (STS) securitisering i overensstemmelse med de kriterier og betingelser, der er fastsat i artikel 20, 21 og 22 i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) 2017/2402, eller et STS-ABCP i overensstemmelse med de kriterier og betingelser, der er fastsat i artikel 24, 25 og 26 i nævnte forordning.
a simple, transparent and standardised (STS) securitisation, as determined in accordance with the criteria and conditions laid down in Articles 20, 21 and 22 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council, or an STS ABCP, as determined in accordance with the criteria and conditions laid down in Articles 24, 25 and 26 of that Regulation.
KVANTITATIVE OG KVALITATIVE KREDITKVALITETSKRAV TIL AKTIVER, DER MODTAGES SOM LED I OMVENDTE GENKØBSAFTALER
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE CREDIT QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR ASSETS RECEIVED AS PART OF REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Kvantitative og kvalitative likviditetskrav til aktiver, jf. artikel 15, stk. 6, i forordning (EU) 2017/1131
Quantitative and qualitative liquidity requirements for the assets referred to in Article 15(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1131
Omvendte genkøbsaftaler som omhandlet i artikel 15, stk. 6, i forordning (EU) 2017/1131 skal opfylde fastlagte markedsstandarder, og deres vilkår og betingelser skal gøre det muligt for forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger at håndhæve deres rettigheder fuldt ud i tilfælde af modpartens misligholdelse af sådanne aftaler eller deres opsigelse før tid og give forvaltere af pengemarkedsforeninger ubegrænset ret til at sælge alle aktiver, der er modtaget som sikkerhed.
Reverse repurchase agreements as referred to in Article 15(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1131 shall meet established market standards and their terms and conditions shall enable managers of MMFs to fully enforce their rights in case of default of the counterparty to such agreements, or their early termination and give managers of MMFs the unrestricted right to sell any assets received as collateral,