natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1907/2006 af 18. december 2006 om registrering, vurdering og godkendelse af samt begrænsninger for kemikalier (REACH), om oprettelse af et europæisk kemikalieagentur og om ændring af direktiv 1999/45/EF og ophævelse af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 793/93 og Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1488/94 samt Rådets direktiv 76/769/EØF og Kommissionens direktiv 91/155/EØF, 93/67/EØF, 93/105/EF og 2000/21/EF (EUT L 396 af 30.12.2006, s. 1).
Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ L 183, 29.6.1989, p. 1).
BILAG
Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (OJ L 131, 5.5.1998, p. 11).
»BILAG III
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353, 31.12.2008, p. 1).
Grænseværdier og andre direkte relevante bestemmelser (artikel 16)
Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (OJ L 348, 28.11.1992, p. 1).
A. GRÆNSEVÆRDIER FOR ERHVERVSMÆSSIG EKSPONERING
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Agensens navn
ANNEX
EF-nr.
‘ANNEX III
[1]
Limit values and other directly related provisions (Article 16)
CAS-nr.
A. LIMIT VALUES FOR OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
[2]
Name of agent
Grænseværdier [3]
EC No [1]
Anmærkning
CAS No [2]
Overgangsforanstaltninger
Limit values [3]
Støv fra løvtræ
Notation
Grænseværdi 3 mg/m3 indtil den 17. januar 2023
Transitional measures
Chrom (VI)-forbindelser, der er kræftfremkaldende, som omhandlet i artikel 2, litra a), nr. i)
Hardwood dusts
(som chrom)
Limit value 3 mg/m3 until 17 January 2023
Grænseværdi 0,010 mg/m3 indtil 17. januar 2025
Chromium (VI) compounds which are carcinogens within the meaning of point (i) of Article 2(a)
Grænseværdi: 0,025 mg/m3 for svejsnings- eller plasmaskæreprocesser eller lignende arbejdsprocesser, der frembringer røg, indtil den 17. januar 2025
(as chromium)
Ildfaste keramiske fibre,
Limit value 0,010 mg/m3 until 17 January 2025
der er kræftfremkaldende, som omhandlet i artikel 2, litra a), nr. i)
Limit value: 0,025 mg/m3 for welding or plasma cutting processes or similar work processes that generate fume until 17 January 2025
Respirabelt støv fra krystallinsk siliciumdioxid
Refractory ceramic fibres
Benzen
which are carcinogens within the meaning of point (i) of Article 2(a)
Hud [9]
Respirable crystalline silica dust
Vinylchloridmonomer
Benzene
Ethylenoxid
skin [9]
1,2-epoxypropan
Vinyl chloride monomer
Acrylamid
Ethylene oxide
itropropan
1,2-Epoxypropane
o-toluidin
Acrylamide
1,3-butadien
itropropane
Hydrazin
o-Toluidine
Bromethylen
1,3-Butadiene
B. ANDRE DIREKTE RELEVANTE BESTEMMELSER
Hydrazine
p.m.«
Bromoethylene
EF-nr., dvs. EINECS-, ELINCS- eller NLP-nummer, er det officielle nummer på stoffet i Den Europæiske Union som defineret i forordning (EF) nr. 1272/2008, bilag VI, del 1, punkt 1.1.1.2.
B. OTHER DIRECTLY RELATED PROVISIONS
CAS-nr.: Chemical Abstracts Service-registreringsnummer.
p.m.’
Målt over eller beregnet for en referenceperiode på otte timer.
EC No, i.e. Einecs, ELINCS or NLP, is the official number of the substance within the European Union, as defined in Section 1.1.1.2 in Annex VI, Part 1, to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
mg/m3 = milligram pr. kubikmeter luft ved 20 °C og 101,3 KPa (760 mm kviksølv).
CAS No: Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number.
ppm = parts per million (dele pr. million) udtrykt i luftvolumen (ml/m3).
Measured or calculated in relation to a reference period of eight hours.
f/ml = fibre pr. milliliter.
mg/m3 = milligrams per cubic metre of air at 20 °C and 101,3 kPa (760 mm mercury pressure).
Inhalerbar fraktion: Hvis støv fra løvtræ blandes med andet træstøv, finder grænseværdien anvendelse for alle slags træstøv i denne blanding.
ppm = parts per million by volume in air (ml/m3).
Respirabel fraktion.
f/ml = fibres per millilitre.
Mulighed for et væsentligt bidrag til kroppens samlede belastning ved eksponering via huden.
Inhalable fraction: if hardwood dusts are mixed with other wood dusts, the limit value shall apply to all wood dusts present in that mixture.
Medlemsstaterne sætter de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft for at efterkomme dette direktiv senest den 17. januar 2020.
Respirable fraction.
De meddeler straks Kommissionen teksten til disse love og bestemmelser.
Substantial contribution to the total body burden via dermal exposure possible.
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2004/37/EF [3] har til formål at beskytte arbejdstagere mod risici for deres sundhed og sikkerhed som følge af at være udsat for kræftfremkaldende stoffer eller mutagener under arbejdet.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 17 January 2020.
Formand
Refractory ceramic fibres which are carcinogens within the meaning of point (i) of Article 2(a)
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv (EU) 2017/2399
Directive (EU) 2017/2399 of the European Parliament and of the Council
om ændring af direktiv 2014/59/EU for så vidt angår usikrede gældsinstrumenters prioritetsrækkefølge ved insolvens
amending Directive 2014/59/EU as regards the ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy
efter den almindelige lovgivningsprocedure [3], og ud fra følgende betragtninger:
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure [3],
Da TLAC og MREL har samme mål om at sikre, at institutter i Unionen har en tilstrækkelig tabsabsorberings- og rekapitaliseringskapacitet, bør de to krav være komplementære elementer i et fælles regelsæt.
The objective of the TLAC standard is to ensure that global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), referred to in the Union framework as global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs), have the loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity necessary to help ensure that, in and immediately following a resolution, critical functions can be continued without taxpayers’ funds (public funds) or financial stability being put at risk.
Konkret foreslog Kommissionen, at det harmoniserede minimumsniveau for TLAC-standarden for G-SII'er (»TLAC-minimumskravet«) og kriterierne for passiver, der anvendes til at efterkomme den pågældende standard, bør indføres i EU-retten gennem ændringer til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 575/2013 [5], mens det institutspecifikke tillæg for G-SII'er og det institutspecifikke krav til ikke-G-SII'er samt relevante kriterier bør indføres gennem målrettede ændringer til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2014/59/EU og til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 806/2014 [6].
In its communication of 24 November 2015 entitled ‘Towards the completion of the Banking Union’, the Commission committed itself to bringing forward, by the end of 2016, a legislative proposal that would enable the TLAC standard to be implemented into Union law by the internationally agreed deadline of 2019.
Dette direktiv, der vedrører usikrede gældsinstrumenters prioritetsrækkefølge ved insolvens, supplerer ovennævnte retsakter, som foreslået ændret, og Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2013/36/EU [7].(3) På baggrund af disse forslag og for at sikre retssikkerhed for markederne og for de enheder, der er omfattet af MREL og TLAC, er det vigtigt at sikre rettidig klarhed om kriterierne for de passiver, der anvendes for at efterleve MREL-kravet og den EU-ret, der gennemfører TLAC, og at indføre passende overgangsbestemmelser for nedskrivningsrelevansen af passiver udstedt inden det reviderede kriterium træder i kraft.
The implementation of the TLAC standard into Union law needs to take into account the existing institution-specific minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) applicable to all Union institutions as laid down in Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Medlemsstaterne bør sikre, at institutter har en tilstrækkelig tabsabsorberings- og rekapitaliseringskapacitet til at sikre en smidig og hurtig tabsabsorbering og rekapitalisering med minimal indvirkning på den finansielle stabilitet, samtidig med at en indvirkning på skatteyderne søges undgået.
As TLAC and MREL pursue the same objective of ensuring that Union institutions have sufficient loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity, the two requirements should be complementary elements of a common framework.
Dette bør opnås, ved at institutterne til stadighed overholder et TLAC-minimumskrav, der skal gennemføres i EU-retten ved en ændring af forordning (EU) nr. 575/2013, og med et krav om kapitalgrundlag og nedskrivningsrelevante passiver, jf. direktiv 2014/59/EU.
Concretely, the Commission proposed that the harmonised minimum level of the TLAC standard for G-SIIs (‘the TLAC minimum requirement’) and the eligibility criteria for liabilities used to comply with that standard should be introduced in Union law through amendments to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], while the institution-specific add-on for G-SIIs and the institution-specific requirement for non-G-SIIs as well as relevant eligibility criteria should be addressed through targeted amendments to Directive 2014/59/EU and to Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6].
I henhold til TLAC-standarden skal G-SII'er med visse undtagelser opfylde TLAC-minimumskravet med efterstillede forpligtelser, der ved insolvens er efterstillet forpligtelser, som er udelukket fra TLAC (»krav om efterstillelse«).
This Directive, which concerns the ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy, is complementary to the aforementioned legislative acts, as proposed to be amended, and to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].(3) In view of those proposals and in order to ensure legal certainty for markets and for entities subject to MREL and TLAC, it is important to ensure timely clarity about the eligibility criteria of liabilities used for compliance with MREL and with Union law implementing TLAC, and to introduce appropriate grandfathering provisions for the eligibility of liabilities issued before the revised eligibility criteria come into effect.
Ifølge TLAC-standarden skal efterstillelse opnås gennem retsvirkningerne af en kontrakt (kendt som kontraktmæssig efterstillelse), lovgivningen i en given jurisdiktion (kendt som lovbestemt efterstillelse) eller en given selskabsstruktur (kendt som strukturel efterstillelse).
Member States should ensure that institutions have sufficient loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity to ensure smooth and fast absorption of losses and recapitalisation with a minimum impact on financial stability and while aiming to avoid an impact on taxpayers.
Når det kræves i henhold til direktiv 2014/59/EU, bør institutter, der falder inden for nævnte direktivs anvendelsesområde, opfylde deres selskabsspecifikke krav med efterstillede forpligtelser for at minimere risikoen for et sagsanlæg fra kreditorer, fordi kreditorernes tab ved afvikling er større end de tab, de ville have lidt ved almindelig insolvensbehandling (princippet om, at ingen kreditorer må stilles ringere).
That should be achieved through constant compliance by institutions with the TLAC minimum requirement, which is to be implemented in Union law through an amendment of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, and with a requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities as provided for in Directive 2014/59/EU.
En række medlemsstater har ændret eller er i gang med at ændre prioritetsrækkefølgen ved insolvens for usikret ikke-efterstillet gæld i deres nationale insolvensret, således at deres institutter på en mere effektiv måde kan opfylde kravet om efterstillelse og dermed lette afvikling.
The TLAC standard requires G-SIIs to meet the TLAC minimum requirement, with certain exceptions, with subordinated liabilities that rank in insolvency below liabilities excluded from TLAC (‘subordination requirement’).
De nationale regler, som er blevet vedtaget indtil videre, er meget forskellige.
Under the TLAC standard, subordination is to be achieved through the legal effects of a contract (known as contractual subordination), the laws of a given jurisdiction (known as statutory subordination) or a given corporate structure (known as structural subordination).
Det forhold, at der ikke er nogen ensartede EU-regler, skaber usikkerhed for både udstedende institutter og investorer og vil sandsynligvis gøre det vanskeligere at anvende bail-in-værktøjet for grænseoverskridende institutter.
Where required by Directive 2014/59/EU, institutions falling within the scope of that Directive should meet their firm-specific requirement with subordinated liabilities so as to minimise the risk of legal challenge by creditors, on the basis that the creditors’ losses in resolution are greater than the losses that they would have incurred under normal insolvency proceedings (the no-creditor-worse-off principle).
Fraværet af harmoniserede EU lovgivning vil sandsynligvis ligeledes fordreje konkurrencevilkårene på det indre marked, da institutternes omkostninger ved at opfylde kravet om efterstillelse og investorernes omkostninger, når de køber gældsinstrumenter udstedt af institutter, kan være meget forskellige i Unionen.
A number of Member States have amended or are in the process of amending the rules on insolvency ranking of unsecured senior debt under their national insolvency law to allow their institutions to comply with the subordination requirement in a more efficient manner, thereby facilitating resolution.
Det er derfor nødvendigt at fjerne væsentlige hindringer for det indre markeds funktion og undgå konkurrencefordrejninger som følge af manglende harmonisering af reglerne i EU om bankkreditorrækkefølgen og for at undgå sådanne hindringer og fordrejninger i fremtiden.
The national rules adopted so far diverge significantly.
Det passende retsgrundlag for dette direktiv er derfor artikel 114 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde.
The absence of harmonised Union rules creates uncertainty for issuing institutions and investors alike and is likely to make the application of the bail-in tool for cross-border institutions more difficult.
Målene for dette direktiv, nemlig at fastsætte harmoniserede regler om prioritetsrækkefølgen ved insolvens for usikrede gældsinstrumenter i EU's regelsæt for genopretning og afvikling og navnlig at øge bail-in-ordningens effektivitet, kan ikke i tilstrækkelig grad opfyldes af medlemsstaterne, men kan på grund af foranstaltningens omfang bedre nås på EU-plan; Unionen kan derfor vedtage foranstaltninger i overensstemmelse med nærhedsprincippet, jf. artikel 5 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union.
It is, therefore, necessary to remove the significant obstacles in the functioning of the internal market and avoid distortions of competition resulting from the absence of harmonised Union rules on bank creditors’ hierarchy and to prevent such obstacles and distortions from arising in the future.
I overensstemmelse med proportionalitetsprincippet, jf. nævnte artikel, går dette direktiv ikke videre, end hvad der er nødvendigt for at nå disse mål.
Consequently, the appropriate legal basis for this Directive is Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Dette direktiv harmoniserer prioritet ved almindelig insolvensbehandling for usikrede fordringer vedrørende gældsinstrumenter og omfatter ikke prioritetsrækkefølgen ved insolvens for indskud ud over de eksisterende gældende bestemmelser i direktiv 2014/59/EU.
To ensure that the new non-preferred senior class of debt instruments meets the eligibility criteria as described in the TLAC standard and as set out in Directive 2014/59/EU, thereby enhancing legal certainty, Member States should ensure that those debt instruments have an original contractual maturity of at least one year, do not contain embedded derivatives and are not derivatives themselves, and that the relevant contractual documentation related to their issuance and, where applicable, the prospectus explicitly refer to their lower ranking under normal insolvency proceedings.
Dette direktiv berører derfor ikke medlemsstaternes nuværende eller fremtidige nationale lovgivning vedrørende almindelig insolvensbehandling, som omfatter prioritetsrækkefølgen ved insolvens for indskud, for så vidt at denne prioritetsrækkefølge ikke er harmoniseret ved direktiv 2014/59/EU, uanset hvornår indskuddene er foretaget.
Debt instruments with variable interest derived from a broadly used reference rate, such as Euribor or Libor, and debt instruments not denominated in the domestic currency of the issuer, provided that principal, repayment and interest are denominated in the same currency, should not be considered to be debt instruments containing embedded derivatives solely because of those features.
VEDTAGET DETTE DIREKTIV:
Member States should also ensure that the new non-preferred senior class of debt instruments has a higher priority ranking than the priority ranking of own funds instruments and the priority ranking of any subordinated liabilities that do not qualify as own funds.
Artikel 1
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely to lay down harmonised rules for the insolvency ranking of unsecured debt instruments for the purposes of the Union recovery and resolution framework and, in particular, to improve the effectiveness of the bail-in regime, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ændring af direktiv 2014/59/EU
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
I direktiv 2014/59/EU foretages følgende ændringer:
In particular, this Directive should be without prejudice to other options and exemptions provided for in the TLAC standard to comply with the subordination requirement.
Artikel 2, stk. 1, nr. 48), affattes således:
It is appropriate for the amendments to Directive 2014/59/EU provided for in this Directive to apply to unsecured claims resulting from debt instruments issued on or after the date of application of this Directive.
med henblik på anvendelsen af artikel 63, stk. 1, litra g) og j), obligationer og andre former for omsættelig gæld, instrumenter, der skaber eller anerkender en gæld, og instrumenter, der giver ret til at erhverve gældsinstrumenter, og
Member States should therefore ensure that the insolvency ranking of all outstanding unsecured claims resulting from debt instruments that institutions have issued before that date is governed by the laws of the Member States as adopted at 31 December 2016.
med henblik på anvendelsen af artikel 108 obligationer og andre former for omsættelig gæld og instrumenter, der skaber eller anerkender en gæld.«
To the extent that certain national laws as adopted at 31 December 2016 already address the objective of allowing institutions to issue subordinated liabilities, part or all of the outstanding unsecured claims resulting from debt instruments issued prior to the date of application of this Directive should be able to have the same insolvency ranking as the non-preferred senior debt instruments issued under the conditions of this Directive.
Artikel 108 affattes således:
In addition, after 31 December 2016 and before the date of entry into force of this Directive, Member States should be able to adapt their national laws governing the ranking in normal insolvency proceedings of unsecured claims resulting from debt instruments issued after the date of application of such laws in order to comply with the conditions laid down in this Directive.
»Artikel 108
In that case, only the unsecured claims resulting from the debt instruments issued before the application of that new national law should continue to be governed by the laws of the Member States as adopted at 31 December 2016.
Prioritetsrækkefølge ved insolvens
This Directive should not prevent Member States from providing that this Directive should continue to apply when the issuing entities are no longer subject to the Union recovery and resolution framework because of, in particular, the divestment of their credit or investment activities to a third party.
Medlemsstaterne sikrer i deres nationale lovgivning vedrørende almindelig insolvensbehandling:
This Directive harmonises the ranking under normal insolvency proceedings of unsecured claims resulting from debt instruments and does not cover the insolvency ranking of deposits beyond the existing applicable provisions of Directive 2014/59/EU.
at følgende har den samme prioritet, som er højere end prioriteten for almindelige usikrede kreditorers fordringer:
This Directive is therefore without prejudice to any existing or future national laws of Member States governing normal insolvency proceedings that cover the insolvency ranking of deposits, to the extent that such ranking is not harmonised by Directive 2014/59/EU, irrespective of the date on which the deposits were made.
den del af berettigede indskud fra fysiske personer og mikrovirksomheder, små og mellemstore virksomheder, som overskrider dækningsniveauet i artikel 6 i direktiv 2014/49/EU
By 29 December 2020, the Commission should review the application of Directive 2014/59/EU with regard to the ranking of deposits in insolvency and assess in particular the need for any further amendments thereto.
indskud, der ville være berettigede indskud fra fysiske personer og mikrovirksomheder, små eller mellemstore virksomheder, hvis ikke de var foretaget gennem filialer beliggende uden for Unionen af institutter, der er etableret inden for Unionen
To ensure legal certainty for markets and individual institutions and to facilitate the effective application of the bail-in tool, this Directive should enter into force on the day following that of its publication,
at følgende har den samme prioritet, som er højere end prioriteten efter litra a):
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
dækkede indskud
Article 1
indskudsgarantiordninger, der indtræder i dækkede indskyderes rettigheder og forpligtelser ved insolvens.
Amendments to Directive 2014/59/EU
Medlemsstaterne sikrer, at almindelige usikrede fordringer for enheder som omhandlet i artikel 1, stk. 1, første afsnit, litra a)-d), i henhold til de nationale bestemmelser om almindelig insolvensbehandling har en højere prioritet end usikrede fordringer vedrørende gældsinstrumenter, der opfylder følgende betingelser:
Directive 2014/59/EU is amended as follows:
gældsinstrumenternes oprindelige kontraktmæssige løbetid er mindst et år
in Article 2(1), point (48) is replaced by the following:
gældsinstrumenterne indeholder ikke indbyggede derivater og er ikke selv derivater
“debt instruments”: