natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dette skal imidlertid ses i sammenhæng med den antidumping- og udligningstold, der gælder for GIL (15,7 % i alt) i forhold til HEG (7 % i alt).
In the absence of any other more reliable source to establish export volumes from India to other third country markets, the United Nations Database was used.
De vigtigste eksportmarkeder for den indiske eksport i 2015 var USA, Saudi-Arabien, Iran, Tyrkiet og De Forenede Arabiske Emirater, Republikken Korea og Egypten.
Export volume overall decreased between 2012 and the RIP (by 10 %).
I perioden 2012-2015 steg den indiske eksport til nogle af disse markeder (f.eks. Saudi-Arabien, De Forenede Emirater og USA), hvorimod eksporten til en række andre lande (Iran, Tyrkiet, Republikken Korea og Egypten) faldt samlet med 9 %.
The main destinations for the Indian exports in 2015 were USA, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey and United Arab Emirates, Republic of Korea, Egypt.
Rusland var i 2012 de indiske producenters tredjestørste eksportmarked målt i mængde, men efter Ruslands indførelse af en værditold på importen af GES fra Indien på mellem 16,04 % og 32,83 % i december 2012 [20] faldt eksporten fra Indien til Rusland fra 4415 ton til 638 ton i 2015, hvilket er et fald på 86 %.
Between 2012 and 2015 Indian exports to some of these destinations increased (such as Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, USA) while to some others (Iran, Turkey, Republic of Korea, Egypt) they decreased, with and overall decrease of 9 %.
Oplysningerne om eksportmængder i FN's database kunne kontrolleres ved at sammenligne dem med oplysningerne fra de indiske myndigheder fremlagt i den sideløbende antisubsidieundersøgelse, dvs. eksportstatistikker fra Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics (»DGCIS«), der viste samme tendens som i FN's database.
While in 2012 Russia was the third export market for the Indian producers in terms of volume, after Russia imposed an ad valorem duty on imports of GES from India ranging from 16,04 % to 32,83 % in December 2012 [20] the exports from India to Russia dropped from 4415 tonnes to 638 tonnes in 2015, a decrease of 86 %.
Den samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producent HEG's eksportmængde til andre tredjelande viste derudover ligeledes samme tendens, dvs. en stigning i eksportmængden til andre tredjelande fra 2012 til 2013 og et fald fra 2014 til NUP med en generelt faldende tendens i den betragtede periode.
The information on export volumes in the United Nations Database could be counter-checked with the information provided by the GOI in the parallel anti-subsidy investigation, i.e. export statistics of the Directorate-General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics (‘DGCIS’), which showed similar trends as the ones observed in the United Nations Database.
Det skal bemærkes, at den samlede eksportmængde i NUP fortsat var betydelig og udgjorde mellem 20000 og 30000 ton på trods af dette fald i eksportmængden.
In addition, export volumes to other third countries of the cooperating exporting producer HEG also followed similar trends, i.e. an increase of export volumes to other third countries from 2012 to 2013 and a decrease from 2014 to the RIP with an overall decreasing trend during the period considered.
Med hensyn til prisniveauerne ved eksport viste undersøgelsen baseret på FN's database, at de indiske eksportpriser til visse lande såsom USA og Republikken Korea, der i gennemsnit normalt var lavere end priserne i EU mellem 2012 og 2014, er steget i 2015 til omkring samme niveau som priserne i EU.
To be noted that despite this decrease of export volumes, the overall level in the RIP remained significant, between 20000 tonnes and 30000 tonnes.
De indiske priser ved eksport til andre lande såsom Saudi-Arabien, som var lavere end priserne i EU mellem 2012 og 2014, steg desuden stærkere end EU-priserne i 2015.
Regarding export price levels, based on the United Nations Database the investigation revealed that Indian export prices to certain countries like the USA and the Republic of Korea that used to be on average lower than the prices in EU between 2012 and 2014 have increased in 2015 at around the same level as the prices in the EU.
De indiske eksportpriser til visse andre lande såsom Tyrkiet var desuden fortsat lavere end EU-priserne i hele den betragtede periode.
In addition, Indian export prices to other countries, like Saudi Arabia for instance, that were lower than the prices in EU between 2012 and 2014, increased at a higher level than the EU prices in 2015.
Det skal imidlertid bemærkes, at der i priserne i denne database ikke skelnes mellem forskellige varetyper, og pålideligheden af denne prissammenligning er derfor begrænset.
Moreover, Indian exports to certain other countries, like Turkey for instance, continued to be lower than the EU prices during the whole period considered.
Analysen af oplysningerne om den samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producents priser ved eksport til andre tredjelandsmarkeder viste, at gennemsnitspriserne på EU-markedet i 2012 og 2014 var højere end HEG's gennemsnitspriser på andre tredjelandsmarkeder (justeret for kalenderår, da dataene blev fremlagt på regnskabsårsbasis), hvorimod gennemsnitspriserne på EU-markedet var lavere end HEG's gennemsnitspriser på andre tredjelandsmarkeder i NUP.
To be noted however that the prices in this database do not distinguish between different product types and therefore the reliability of such a price comparison on this basis is limited.
Der forelå ingen andre oplysninger, der kunne bruges til at fastsætte præcise niveauer for de indiske eksporterende producenters priser ved eksport til andre tredjelandsmarkeder.
The analysis of the information on export prices to other third country markets of the cooperating exporting producer showed that during 2012 and 2014 the average prices in the Union market were higher than the average prices of HEG on other third markets (adjusted on a calendar year basis as data were provided on a financial year basis) while during the RIP the average prices in the Union market were lower than the average prices of HEG on other third markets.
EU-markedets tiltrækningskraft
No other data were available to establish accurate price levels of the Indian exporting producers to other third country markets.
EU-markedets tiltrækningskraft blev påvist derved, at GES fra Indien fortsat blev indført på EU-markedet på trods af den gældende antidumping- og udligningstold.
Attractiveness of the Union market
I den betragtede periode var Indien fortsat den næststørste eksportør til Unionen efter Folkerepublikken Kina (»Kina«).
The attractiveness of the Union market was demonstrated by the fact that despite the anti-dumping and countervailing duties in force, Indian GES continued to enter the Union market.
På trods af et fald mellem 2012 og NUP var Indiens eksport til Unionen i mængde og markedsandele fortsat betydelig, jf. betragtning 100 nedenfor.
During the period considered, India continued to be the second largest exporting country to the Union after the People's Republic of China (‘China’).
Undersøgelsen viste navnlig, at den indiske eksport til nogle eksportmarkeder (f.eks. Saudi-Arabien, De Forenede Emirater og USA) steg i 2015, hvorimod den samlede eksport fra Indien til andre tredjelandsmarkeder faldt.
The possible development of export sales to the Union should measures be allowed to lapse has to be seen against the background of the overall decrease in consumption of GES in India and worldwide in combination with the spare capacity in India.
Dette viser, at visse tredjelande tilsyneladende har begrænset kapacitet til at absorbere yderligere eksportmængder.
This will in all likelihood increase the pressure on the Indian exporting producers to explore further export markets, in particular when considering their export-oriented business model.
Som anført i betragtning 66 har Rusland desuden indført antidumpingforanstaltninger over for importen af GES fra Indien.
Therefore, should measures in the Union be repealed and the access to the Union market be free of anti-dumping and countervailing duties it is indeed likely that a large part of the available spare capacity will be used for export to the Union market.
Indiske eksporterende producenter har således begrænset adgang til dette marked og kan ikke øge eller omdirigere deres eksportmængder til Rusland, hvilket faldet i eksporten til dette land fra 2012 vidner om.
In particular since the investigation showed that while in some exporting markets (such as Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, USA) Indian exports increased in 2015, overall exports from India to other third country markets followed a decreasing trend.
På denne baggrund er det sandsynligt, at de indiske eksporterende producenter fortsat vil eksportere betydelige mængder til Unionen, hvis foranstaltningerne fik lov til at udløbe, og endog øge deres nuværende eksportmængder i betragtning af deres betydelige uudnyttede kapacitet.
This indicates that on certain third countries there appears to be a limited capacity to absorb additional exports quantities.
Dette er rent faktisk sandsynligt for den samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producent, som vil have et incitament til at øge sin allerede betydelige tilstedeværelse på EU-markedet, og endog endnu mere sandsynligt for den ikke-samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producent, der betaler højere toldsatser i forhold til den samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producent, og som næsten har indstillet sin eksport til EU-markedet.
In addition, as mentioned in recital (66), Russia has imposed anti-dumping duties on imports of GES from India.
Konklusion vedrørende sandsynligheden for fortsat dumping
Indian exporting producers thus have limited access to this market and cannot increase or re-direct their export volumes to Russia, as showed by the drop in exports to this destination as of 2012.
Ovenstående undersøgelse viser, i) at importen fra Indien til EU-markedet fortsat foregik til betydelige dumpingpriser og i betydelige mængder, ii) at de to indiske producenter begge er eksportorienterede og har en uudnyttet kapacitet, som kan anvendes til at øge eksportmængden til Unionen til dumpingpriser, iii) at det globale forbrug er faldende, hvilket begrænser mulighederne for eksport til visse andre tredjelandsmarkeder, og iv) at de gældende antidumpingforanstaltninger i Rusland over for GES fra Indien yderligere begrænser de indiske eksporterende producenters muligheder for eksport.
On this basis, it is likely that the Indian exporting producers will continue to export significant quantities to the Union should measures be allowed to lapse and even increase their current export volumes taking into account their significant spare capacity.
Ud fra ovenstående konkluderedes det, at der er sandsynlighed for fortsat dumping, hvis foranstaltningerne ophæves.
Indeed, this is likely for the cooperating exporting producer that will have an incentive to further increase its already significant presence in the Union market, and even more for the non-cooperating exporting producer, whose duty levels are higher as compared to the cooperating exporting producer and which almost stopped exporting to the Union market.
Efter fremlæggelsen af oplysninger påstod den eneste samarbejdsvillige indiske eksporterende producent, HEG, at Kommissionen ikke har taget højde for de faktiske omstændigheder vedrørende perioden efter NUP i sin vurdering af sandsynligheden for fortsat dumping.
Conclusion on the likelihood of continuation of dumping
Den samarbejdsvillige indiske eksporterende producent fremførte i den forbindelse, at Kommissionen ved anvendelsen af grundforordningens artikel 18 ikke har taget hensyn til, at den anden indiske producent af GES, GIL, har investeret i et produktionsanlæg i EU, nemlig Graphite Cova GmbH (»GIL Cova«).
The foregoing analysis shows that (i) Indian imports continued to enter the Union market at significant dumped prices and in significant quantities; (ii) both Indian producers are export-oriented and have spare capacity which could be used to increase export volumes to the Union at dumped prices; (iii) consumption worldwide is following a decreasing trend, thus reducing the export possibilities to certain other third markets; (iv) the existence of anti-dumping measures in Russia against Indian GES further restricts export possibilities to the Indian exporting producers.
HEG gjorde endvidere gældende, at GIL har en strategisk langfristet kontrakt vedrørende salg af sintrede grønne elektroder — baked green electrodes — (der er et halvfabrikata) til sit grafitiseringsanlæg GIL Cova.
In view of the above, it was concluded that there is a likelihood of continuation of dumping should the measures be repealed.
HEG fremførte endvidere, at Kommissionens konklusion om, at eksporten fra Indien til EU vil stige, er forkert på grund af GIL's strategiske investering, og at konklusionen om, at begge indiske producenter har en uudnyttet eksportkapacitet, er baseret på rene antagelser.
After disclosure, the sole cooperating Indian exporting producer, HEG, claimed that the Commission has not considered the facts pertaining to the period after the RIP in its assessment of likelihood of continuation of dumping.
HEG gjorde også gældende, at foranstaltningernes udløb ikke vil øge importmængden til EU på grund af den faldende eksport fra Indien til EU (herunder HEG's eksport til EU) efter NUP.
In this regard, the cooperating Indian exporting producer claimed that when applying Article 18 of the basic Regulation, the Commission has not taken into account the fact that GIL, the other Indian producer of GES, has made an investment in a manufacturing facility in the Union, that is Graphite Cova GmbH (‘GIL Cova’).
HEG hævdede desuden, at HEG's planer om at øge produktionskapaciteten kun var formandens vision i lyset af det gunstige økonomiske scenario i 2010.
HEG further argued that GIL has a strategic long term contract to sell baked green electrodes (which is a semi-finished product) to its graphitisation facility of GIL Cova.
HEG's årsberetning for det regnskabsår, der blev afsluttet den 31. marts 2016, indeholder således ikke længere nye forslag om kapacitetsudvidelse, som drøftes af bestyrelsen.
HEG also claimed that because of the strategic investment of GIL, the Commission's conclusion that exports from India to the Union will increase is incorrect and that the finding that both Indian producers have spare capacity available for exports is based on mere assumptions.
For så vidt angår Kommissionens prissammenligning i betragtning 69 og 70 vedrørende eksporten til andre tredjelandsmarkeder, fremlagde HEG en analyse af sine gennemsnitlige CIF/CFR-priser til fire andre tredjelande i forhold til de gennemsnitlige CIF-priser til EU og konkluderede, at gennemsnitspriserne til de fire andre tredjelandsmarkeder generelt var højere end HEG's priser til EU.
HEG also argued that the expiry of measures is not going to increase the volume of imports to the Union based on the decreasing trend of exports from India to the Union (including HEG's export to the Union) post RIP.
HEG gjorde derfor gældende, at EU-markedet med lavere prisniveauer til sammenligning ville være mindre attraktivt.
In addition, HEG claimed that the HEG's plans to increase production capacity was only the vision of its Chairman considering the favourable economic scenario of 2010 Thus, in the annual report of HEG for the year ended 31 March 2016 there are no new proposals being discussed by the board of directors for expansion of capacities anymore.
For så vidt angår HEG's påstand vedrørende GIL's investering i GIL Cova i den betragtede periode, eksporterede GIL en meget lille mængde til EU-markedet.
In relation to the comparison of prices carried out by the Commission in recitals (69) and (70) with regard to exports to other third country markets, HEG submitted an analysis of its average CIF/CFR prices to four other third countries as compared to its average CIF prices to the Union and concluded that, in general, its average prices to the four other third countries were higher than its prices to the Union.
Det er imidlertid opfattelsen, at dette ikke kun skyldes GIL's investering i GIL Cova, men primært den høje antidumping- og udligningstold på den indiske producent GIL's eksport til EU (15,7 % i alt).
Therefore, HEG claimed that the Union market with lower price levels would be in comparison less attractive.
Hvis antidumping- og/eller udligningsforanstaltningerne ophæves, er det derfor sandsynligt, at GIL vil genoptage sin eksport til Unionen på trods af sin investering i GIL Cova, også under hensyntagen til GIL's uudnyttede kapacitet og EU-markedets tiltrækningskraft, jf. betragtning 72-75 ovenfor.
As regards HEG's claim concerning the investment of GIL in GIL Cova during the period considered GIL exported a very small volume to the Union market.
For så vidt angår HEG's påstand vedrørende eksportudviklingen efter NUP, understreges det, at denne eksport fandt sted på et tidspunkt, hvor antidumping- og udligningsforanstaltningerne var gældende.
It is however considered that this is not only due to GIL's investment in GIL Cova, but mainly to the high anti-dumping and countervailing duties that apply to the exports of GIL India to Union (15,7 % in total).
Selv om HEG's eksportmængde efter NUP var faldende, er det derfor sandsynligt, at HEG's eksport til EU vil stige, hvis antidumping- og/eller udligningsforanstaltningerne ophæves, da HEG på trods af de indførte foranstaltninger fortsatte med at eksportere til EU-markedet til betydelige dumpingpriser og henset til HEG's eksportorienterede forretningsmodel og uudnyttede kapacitet, som kan forøges i fremtiden, hvis efterspørgslen efter virksomhedens produkter stiger, jf. betragtning 59-75.
In the scenario that the anti-dumping and/or countervailing measures are repealed, it is therefore likely that GIL will resume its exports to the Union, despite its investment in GIL Cova, also taking into account its available spare capacity and the attractiveness of the Union market as described in recitals (72) to (75) above.
For så vidt angår HEG's hensigt om at øge kapaciteten, understreges det endvidere, at HEG under kontrolbesøget i 2016 viste de besøgende en kort film, der gav et overblik over HEG-koncernen.
As concerns HEG's claim regarding the trend of exports after the RIP, it is highlighted that these exports were made while the anti-dumping and countervailing measures were in force.
Et af de elementer, der blev præsenteret i denne film, var virksomhedens fremtidige planer om at øge sin produktionskapacitet.
Therefore, even if the volume of exports of HEG's after the RIP showed a decreasing trend, it is likely that HEG's exports to Union will increase if the anti-dumping and/or countervailing measures are repealed taking into account that despite the measures in place, HEG continued to export to the Union market at significantly dumped prices, its export-oriented business model and its spare capacity which is not excluded to increase in the future if the demand for its products increases, as described in recitals (59)to (75) above.
Virksomhedens repræsentanter forklarede desuden under kontrolbesøget, at disse planer var stillet i bero i øjeblikket, da virksomheden ikke udnyttede sin kapacitet fuldt ud og henset til faldet i den globale efterspørgsel.
Furthermore, regarding HEG's intention to increase capacity, it is highlighted that during the on-spot verification visit in 2016, HEG showed to the case team a short movie providing an overview of HEG's group.
Hvis antidumping- og/eller udligningsforanstaltningerne ophæves, er det derfor sandsynligt, at efterspørgslen efter GES fra Indien på EU-markedet sandsynligvis vil stige, og at HEG derfor vil have et incitament til at øge sin kapacitet for at dække efterspørgslen.
One of the elements presented in this movie were the future plans of the company to increase its production capacity.
For så vidt angår HEG's påstand vedrørende prisforskellene mellem EU-markedet og andre tredjelandsmarkeder, understreges det, at Kommissionens sammenligning i betragtning 69 og 70 foretages mellem de indiske eksporterende producenters gennemsnitspriser på andre tredjelandsmarkeder og EU-producenternes gennemsnitspriser på EU-markedet og ikke de indiske producenters gennemsnitspriser på EU-markedet.
Moreover, the company's representatives explained during the on-spot verification that such plans were currently on hold taking into account that the company was not fully using its capacity and the decrease in the global demand.
Det erindres, at HEG's gennemsnitspris på EU-markedet er stærkt dumpet og underbyder EU-producenternes gennemsnitspris og derfor ikke er egnet til at indgå i den pågældende sammenligning.
Therefore, in the event that the anti-dumping and/or the countervailing measures are repealed, it is likely that the demand for Indian GES in the Union market will likely increase and that HEG therefore, will have an incentive to increase its capacity to meet the demand.
I lyset af ovenstående afvises HEG's påstande.
As concerns HEG's claim referring to the price differences between the Union market and other third country markets, it is highlighted that the comparison carried out by the Commission in recitals (69) and (70) is made between average prices of the Indian exporting producers on other third markets and average prices of Union producers in the Union market and not the average prices of the Indian producers in the Union market.
En anden interesseret part hævdede, at de indiske producenter som følge af det lavere energiforbrug som den vigtigste omkostningsfaktor og lavere arbejdskraftomkostninger har klare komparative fordele i form af omkostningseffektivitet.
It is recalled that the HEG's average price in the Union market is at a significantly dumped level that undercuts the Union producers' average price and is therefore not suitable for the comparison in question.
Det bør imidlertid bemærkes, at undersøgelsen viste, at den vigtigste omkostningsfaktor i fremstillingen af GES i Indien faktisk er koks og ikke energi eller arbejdskraft.
In view of the above, HEG's claims are rejected.
Selv om der var en komparativ fordel for de indiske producenter, bør dette under alle omstændigheder have samme indvirkning på eksportprisen og på den normale værdi og derfor ingen indvirkning på dumpingmargenen.
One other interested party claimed that due to the lower energy consumption, as main cost factor, and lower labour costs, the Indian producers have clear comparative advantages in terms of cost efficiency.
Denne påstand er derfor faktuelt forkert og afvises derfor.
However, it should be noted that the investigation revealed that the main cost driver in the manufacturing process of GES in India is actually the coke and not the energy or the labour.
Kommissionens konklusion om, at der er sandsynlighed for fortsat dumping, hvis foranstaltningerne ophæves, bekræftes således.
In any event, even if there would be a comparative advantage for the Indian producers, this should have a similar effect on the export price and on the normal value and therefore no impact on the dumping margin.
D. SANDSYNLIGHEDEN FOR FORTSAT ELLER FORNYET SKADE
This claim is thus factually wrong and it is therefore rejected.
Definition af EU-erhvervsgrenen og EU-produktionen
The Commission's conclusion that there is a likelihood of continuation of dumping should the measures be repealed is therefore confirmed.
Samme vare blev i den nuværende undersøgelsesperiode fremstillet af otte producenter (to individuelle virksomheder og to virksomhedsgrupper).
D. LIKELIHOOD OF A CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF INJURY
Som anført i betragtning 61 er udviklingen i GES-industrien tæt forbundet med udviklingen i elektrostålindustrien, hvor GES anvendes i elektriske stålovne til smeltning af stålskrot.
During the review investigation period, the like product was manufactured by eight producers (two individual companies and two groups).
I denne forbindelse var markedsvilkårene i elektrostålindustrien negative i den betragtede periode, hvor forbruget faldt, hvilket også afspejles i forbruget af GES.
They constitute the ‘Union industry’ within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.