natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
På grundlag af de foreliggende oplysninger, herunder de oplysninger der blev fremlagt af FATA ved det tekniske samrådsmøde den 17. marts 2017, vurderes det, at FATA på nuværende tidspunkt hverken mangler evne eller vilje til at afhjælpe sikkerhedsmangler.
Air carriers from Russia
Af denne grund konkluderede Kommissionen, at der ikke er behov for en høring i Kommissionen og Udvalget for Luftfartssikkerhed af de russiske luftfartsmyndigheder eller af nogen luftfartsselskaber, der er certificeret i Rusland.
The Commission, EASA and the competent authorities of the Member States have over the past six months continued to closely monitor the safety performance of air carriers certified in Russia and operating within the Union, including through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on certain Russian air carriers in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Ifølge de fælles kriterier, der er fastsat i bilaget til forordning (EF) nr. 2111/2005, finder Kommissionen derfor, at der på nuværende tidspunkt ikke er nogen grund til at ændre listen over luftfartsselskaber med driftsforbud i Unionen ved at optage luftfartsselskaber fra Rusland på denne.
On 17 March 2017, representatives of the Commission, EASA and a Member State met with representatives of the Russian Federal Air Transport Agency (‘FATA’).
Medlemsstaterne skal fortsat kontrollere den faktiske overholdelse af relevante sikkerhedsstandarder ved hjælp af prioritering af rampeinspektioner, som udføres hos luftfartsselskaber, der er certificeret i Rusland, i overensstemmelse med forordning (EU) nr. 965/2012.
The purpose of the meeting was to review the safety performance of air carriers certified in Russia on the basis of ramp inspection reports for the period between 11 March 2016 and 10 March 2017 and to identify cases where oversight activities by the FATA have to be strengthened.
Hvis disse inspektioner peger i retning af en umiddelbar sikkerhedsrisiko som følge af manglende overholdelse af de relevante sikkerhedsstandarder, kan Kommissionen se sig nødsaget til at træffe foranstaltninger mod luftfartsselskaber fra Rusland i overensstemmelse med forordning (EF) nr. 2111/2005.
During that meeting, the Commission reviewed the SAFA ramp inspection results of six air carriers certified in Russia in more detail.
Luftfartsselskaber fra Saint Vincent og Grenadinerne
While no safety concerns were identified, the FATA informed the Commission that, because of the limited number of inspections carried out on some air carriers, additional inspections will be performed during the next quarter on two of those air carriers.
Den 16. april 2015 ansøgte Mustique Airways, der er registreret i Saint Vincent og Grenadinerne, EASA om en TCO-godkendelse.
Based on the information currently available, including the information provided by the FATA at the technical consultation meeting of 17 March 2017, it is assessed that there is currently no lack of ability nor a lack of willingness on the part of the FATA to address safety deficiencies.
EASA vurderede ansøgningen i overensstemmelse med kravene i forordning (EU) nr. 452/2014 og fremsatte grundlæggende betænkeligheder angående Mustique Airways' manglende påvisning af overholdelse af kravene i artikel 3 i forordning (EU) nr. 452/2014.
On those grounds, the Commission concluded that a hearing before the Commission and the Air Safety Committee of the Russian aviation authorities or of any air carriers certified in Russia was not necessary.
EASA har derfor konkluderet, at en yderligere vurdering ikke vil føre til, at der udstedes en TCO-godkendelse til Mustique Airways, fordi det ikke opfyldte disse krav.
In accordance with the common criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, the Commission therefore considers that, at this time, there are no grounds for amending the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union to include air carriers from Russia.
Den 4. oktober 2016 afviste EASA derfor ansøgningen af sikkerhedsmæssige årsager.
Member States are to continue to verify effective compliance with relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on air carriers certified in Russia, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Den 30. januar 2017 anmodede Kommissionen den kompetente myndighed for Saint Vincent og Grenadinerne, Østcaribiens civile luftfartsmyndighed (ECCAA), om oplysninger angående de foranstaltninger, der er truffet efter EASA's afvisning af TCO-ansøgningen indgivet af Mustique Airways.
Should those inspections point to an imminent safety risk as a consequence of non-compliance with the relevant safety standards, the Commission may be obliged to take action against air carriers from Russia, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Den 24. februar 2017 meddelte ECCAA Kommissionen, at Mustique Airways den 2. februar 2017 havde indgivet en fornyet ansøgning om TCO-godkendelse til EASA med den begrundelse, at de sikkerhedsmæssige betænkeligheder, der førte til afvisning af EASA, ifølge Mustique Airways var blevet afhjulpet på tilfredsstillende vis.
Air carriers from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Da hverken Mustique Airways eller ECCAA kunne fremlægge dokumentation for, at de sikkerhedsmæssige betænkeligheder, der fulgte af EASA's TCO-sikkerhedsvurdering, var blevet afhjulpet, fik både ECCAA og Mustique Airways den 26. april 2017 mulighed for at blive hørt af Kommissionen og Udvalget for Luftfartssikkerhed i henhold til artikel 7 i forordning (EF) nr. 2111/2005.
On 16 April 2015, the air carrier Mustique Airways, registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, applied to EASA for a TCO authorisation.
Myndigheden reagerede ikke på opfordringen om at blive hørt og deltog ikke i høringen.
EASA assessed that application in accordance with the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 452/2014 and raised fundamental concerns regarding the failure by Mustique Airways to demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements laid down in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 452/2014.
ECCAA fremlagde heller ikke oplysninger om de foranstaltninger, der på baggrund af TCO-anmærkningerne er truffet over for Mustique Airways, eller om sine tilsynsaktiviteter.
EASA therefore concluded that further assessment would not result in the issuing of a TCO authorisation to Mustique Airways because it did not meet those requirements.
Den 24. april 2017 afholdt EASA et teknisk møde med Mustique Airways for at drøfte dets fornyede ansøgning.
Therefore, on 4 October 2016, EASA rejected the application on safety grounds.
I betragtning af det korte tidsrum mellem dette møde og høringen var det ikke muligt for EASA at foretage en fuldstændig vurdering af den fornyede ansøgning.
On 30 January 2017, the Commission requested information from the competent authority of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, the Eastern Caribbean Civil Aviation Authority (‘ECCAA’), on the measures taken following EASA's rejection of the TCO application made by Mustique Airways.
EASA var imidlertid i stand til at bekræfte over for Kommissionen og Udvalget for Luftfartssikkerhed, at de vigtigste underliggende årsager, der førte til de alvorlige og gentagne sikkerhedsmangler, som EASA havde konstateret ved den første TCO-vurdering, fortsat er til stede.
On 24 February 2017, the ECCAA informed the Commission that Mustique Airways had re-applied to EASA for a TCO authorisation on 2 February 2017, on the grounds that, according to Mustique Airways, the safety concerns that led to the rejection by EASA would have been resolved in a satisfactory manner.
Ved høringen den 26. april 2017 forelagde Mustique Airways oplysninger om selskabets aktiviteter og faciliteter, men kom kun i begrænset omfang ind på sikkerhedsrelaterede aspekter.
Since neither Mustique Airways nor the ECCAA provided any evidence that the safety concerns resulting from the TCO safety assessment by EASA had indeed been resolved, both the ECCAA and Mustique Airways were given the opportunity to be heard on 26 April 2017 by the Commission and the Air Safety Committee in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Ud fra oplysningerne fra Mustique Airways om de fremskridt, selskabet har gjort for så vidt angår udviklingen af dets sikkerheds- og kvalitetsstyringssystemer, fremgår det, at de ikke er tilstrækkeligt udviklet.
The authority did not respond to the invitation to be heard and did not participate in the hearing.
Mustique Airways' villighed til at indgå i en mere effektiv dialog med EASA vedrørende Mustique Airways' fornyede ansøgning om en TCO-godkendelse er glædelig, men det blev konstateret, at væsentlige sikkerhedsmæssige elementer, f.eks. et grundlæggende sikkerhedsstyringssystem, ikke er til stede.
Equally, the ECCAA did not provide information on the measures taken on the TCO findings with regard to Mustique Airways or on its oversight activities.
Desuden viste Mustique Airways en mangel på bevidsthed om og forståelse for, hvor alvorlige de af EASA fremsatte anmærkninger er.
On 24 April 2017 EASA held a technical meeting with Mustique Airways to discuss its re-application.
Endelig stod det klart, at sikkerhedskulturen hos luftfartsselskabet snarere er reaktiv end proaktiv.
In view of the short time span between this meeting and the hearing, it was not possible for EASA to conduct a full assessment of the re-application.
Det fremgår af de foreliggende oplysninger, herunder de oplysninger, der blev forelagt af EASA inden for rammerne af Mustique Airways' afviste TCO-ansøgning og inden for rammerne af den igangværende fornyede ansøgning, samt alle de oplysninger, som Mustique Airways har forelagt, at der er dokumentation for alvorlige sikkerhedsmangler hos Mustique Airways.
However, EASA was in a position to confirm to the Commission and the Air Safety Committee that the main root causes that led to the serious and repetitive safety deficiencies which EASA had identified during the first TCO assessment, remain present.
Mustique Airways er på nuværende tidspunkt ikke i tilstrækkelig grad i stand til at afhjælpe sine sikkerhedsmangler.
During the hearing on 26 April 2017, Mustique Airways provided information on the company's business and facilities, and only to a limited extent on safety-related aspects.
Faktisk er dets igangværende sikkerhedsforanstaltninger i vid udstrækning i udviklingsfasen, og den korrigerende handlingsplan, som Mustique Airways fremlagde som opfølgning på de påpegede anmærkninger i forbindelse med TCO-sikkerhedsvurderingen, er ikke tilstrækkelig solid, navnlig med hensyn til den nødvendige årsagsanalyse.
The information provided by Mustique Airways on the progress it has made in relation to the development of its safety and quality management systems indicated that these are insufficiently developed.
Ifølge de fælles kriterier, der er fastsat i bilaget til forordning (EF) nr. 2111/2005, finder Kommissionen derfor, at listen over luftfartsselskaber med driftsforbud i Unionen bør ændres for at opføre Mustique Airways i bilag A til forordning (EF) nr. 474/2006.
While welcoming the readiness of Mustique Airways to engage in a more effective dialogue with EASA on the re-application by Mustique Airways for a TCO authorisation, it was found that essential safety elements, such as a basic safety management system, are not present.
Medlemsstaterne skal fortsat kontrollere den faktiske overholdelse af de relevante sikkerhedsstandarder ved hjælp af prioritering af rampeinspektioner, som udføres hos luftfartsselskaber, der er certificeret i Saint Vincent og Grenadinerne, i overensstemmelse med forordning (EU) nr. 965/2012.
Moreover, Mustique Airways showed a lack of awareness and comprehension of the seriousness of the findings raised by EASA.
Luftfartsselskaber fra Thailand
Finally, it became clear that the safety culture at the air carrier is of a re-active nature rather than of a pro-active nature.
Den 17. marts 2017 blev der afholdt et teknisk samrådsmøde med deltagelse af Kommissionen, EASA og Thailands civile luftfartsmyndighed (CAAT).
The information available at present, including the information provided by EASA in the framework of the rejected TCO application of Mustique Airways, and in the framework of the on-going re-application, as well as all information provided by the air carrier Mustique Airways, shows that there is evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Mustique Airways.
På dette møde oplyste CAAT Kommissionen om de fremskridt, der er gjort siden september 2016, især for så vidt angår lufttransportsystemet i Thailand, CAAT's køreplan for overholdelse og den aktuelle status for gennemførelsen af den korrigerende handlingsplan.
Mustique Airways is at present not sufficiently able to address its safety deficiencies.
Fremskridtene vedrører først og fremmest Thailands nye lov om civil luftfart, som forventes at træde i kraft i sidste kvartal af 2017, ændringen af forskrifterne for CAAT, dens ajourførte organisationsstruktur, bæredygtige finansieringsmekanismer og det forbedrede rekrutterings- og uddannelsesprogram for inspektørerne.
In fact, its ongoing safety actions are largely in the development stage, and the corrective action plan which Mustique Airways presented in response to the findings identified during the TCO safety assessment is not robust enough, in particular with regard to the necessary root cause analysis.
CAAT's inspektionsprocedurer, håndbøger og værktøjer, herunder IT-systemet, er blevet forbedret og dens sikkerhedstilsynsprogram er blevet ajourført for at sikre et fuldstændigt og løbende tilsyn med luftfartsselskaber, der er certificeret i Thailand.
In accordance with the common criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, the Commission therefore considers that the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union should be amended to include the air carrier Mustique Airways in Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 474/2006.
CAAT har endvidere oprettet en kvalitetssikringsafdeling, der har til opgave at overvåge, om CAAT overholder de internationale og nationale luftfartssikkerhedsstandarder.
Member States are to continue to verify the effective compliance with relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on air carriers certified in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Desuden fremlagde CAAT oplysninger om udviklingen af dens statslige sikkerhedsprogram og om situationen med hensyn til de anmærkninger, der blev fremsat i forbindelse med ICAO's audit i januar 2015, herunder den betydelige sikkerhedsmæssige betænkelighed vedrørende certificeringen af luftfartsselskaber, der var baseret på disse anmærkninger.
Air carriers from Thailand
Endelig fremlagde CAAT oplysninger om de fremskridt, som myndigheden har gjort med hensyn til sin bæredygtighedsplan, og det internationale samarbejde, som CAAT deltager i.
On 17 March 2017, a technical consultation meeting was held between the Commission, EASA and the Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand (‘CAAT’).
Et vigtigt element i CAAT's korrigerende handlingsplan er den fornyede certificering af luftfartsselskaber i Thailand efter ICAO's strukturerede procedure i fem faser til certificering af luftfartsselskaber.
During that meeting, the CAAT updated the Commission on the progress made since September 2016, in particular as regards the air transport system in Thailand, the CAAT's roadmap towards compliance and the current status of the implementation of its corrective action plan.
I februar 2017 opnåede det første af de luftfartsselskaber, der opererer internationalt, fornyet certificering, og frem til udgangen af juni 2017 forventer CAAT at foretage en fornyet certificering af 12 andre luftfartsselskaber, der beskæftiger sig med international lufttransport.
The main elements of progress are Thailand's new Civil Aviation Act that is expected to enter into force in the last quarter of 2017, the amendment of the CAAT's regulations, its updated organisation, sustainable funding mechanisms and the improved staffing and training programme for its inspectors.
I forbindelse med den fornyede certificering har CAAT iværksat håndhævelsesforanstaltninger over for visse luftfartsselskaber, der har ansøgt om fornyet certificering.
The CAAT's inspection processes, manuals and tools, including the IT system, have been improved and its safety oversight programme has been updated in order to ensure complete and continuous oversight of air carriers certified in Thailand.
Thailands regering og CAAT har udvist en klar vilje til at forbedre sikkerhedstilsynssystemet i Thailand.
The CAAT has also created a quality assurance department, charged with monitoring the compliance of CAAT with international and national aviation safety standards.
CAAT har fremlagt dokumentation for, at der er sket relevante fremskridt i løbet af de seneste seks måneder.
The CAAT also provided information on the development of its State Safety Programme and the situation with respect to the findings raised during the ICAO audit of January 2015, including the Significant Safety Concern on the certification of air operators based on those findings.
De foreliggende sikkerhedsoplysninger vedrørende luftfartsselskaber, der er certificeret i Thailand, giver ikke anledning til at støtte en afgørelse om at indføre et driftsforbud eller driftsmæssige begrænsninger.
Furthermore, the CAAT provided information on the progress made regarding its sustainability plan and the international cooperation that the CAAT is engaged in.
For at kunne overvåge situationen nøje skal samrådene med de thailandske myndigheder fortsætte i henhold til artikel 3, stk. 2, i forordning (EF) nr. 473/2006.
An important element of the corrective action plan of the CAAT is the recertification of the air carriers in Thailand, following the ICAO structured five phase approach for certication of air carriers.
Ifølge de fælles kriterier, der er fastsat i bilaget til forordning (EF) nr. 2111/2005, finder Kommissionen derfor, at der på nuværende tidspunkt ikke er nogen grund til at ændre listen over luftfartsselskaber med driftsforbud i Unionen for så vidt angår luftfartsselskaber fra Thailand.
In February 2017 the first of those air carriers which operates internationally was recertified and until the end of June 2017 the CAAT expects to recertify 12 other air carriers engaged in international air transport.
Medlemsstaterne skal fortsat kontrollere den faktiske overholdelse af de relevante sikkerhedsstandarder ved hjælp af prioritering af rampeinspektioner, som udføres hos luftfartsselskaber, der er certificeret i Thailand, i overensstemmelse med forordning (EU) nr. 965/2012.
During the recertification process, the CAAT has taken enforcement measures in respect of certain applicants for recertification.
Luftfartsselskaber fra Ukraine
The government of Thailand and the CAAT demonstrated a clear commitment to improving the safety oversight system in Thailand.
Den 15. september 2016 afviste EASA derfor ansøgningen af sikkerhedsmæssige årsager.
The CAAT has provided evidence that relevant progress has been achieved over the past six months.
Den 13. oktober 2016 afviste EASA derfor ansøgningen af sikkerhedsmæssige årsager.
The safety information available at present, with regard to air carriers certified in Thailand, does not support a decision to impose a ban or operational restrictions.
Den 3. april 2017 tilbagekaldte SAAU Air Company »Black Sea Airlines« LLC's luftfartscertifikat.
In order to monitor the situation closely, consultations with the authorities from Thailand are to continue, in accordance with Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 473/2006.
Med denne afgørelse afsluttedes det formelle samråd vedrørende det pågældende luftfartsselskab, der var indledt den 6. marts 2017.
In accordance with the common criteria set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, the Commission therefore considers that, at this time, there are no grounds for amending the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union with respect to air carriers from Thailand.
SAAU fremlagde også oplysninger om vedtagelsen af mulige tiltag på kort sigt, f.eks. suspendering, begrænsning eller tilbagekaldelse af luftfartscertifikatet for luftfartsselskaber, hvis ansøgning om TCO-godkendelse er blevet afvist af EASA.
Member States are to continue to verify the effective compliance with relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on air carriers certified in Thailand, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012.
Denne audit bekræftede de mangler i luftfartsselskabets eksisterende dokumentationssystem, der tidligere var konstateret af EASA.
EASA therefore concluded that further assessment would not result in the issuing of a TCO authorisation to International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’ because it did not meet those requirements.
Det fremgår desuden af disse oplysninger, at luftfartsselskabet i øjeblikket ikke er i stand til selv at fastslå manglende overholdelse i alle sine procedurer og aktiviteter.
EASA therefore concluded that further assessment would not result in the issuing of a TCO authorisation to Air Company ‘Black Sea Airlines’ LLC because it did not meet those requirements.
Den 12. april 2016 ansøgte Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd, der er registreret i Zimbabwe, EASA om en TCO-godkendelse.
Since the safety concerns resulting from the TCO safety assessment by EASA had not been resolved, the SAAU, International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’ and Air Company ‘Black Sea Airlines’ LLC were given the opportunity to be heard on 25 April 2017 by the Commission and the Air Safety Committee in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
EASA vurderede ansøgningen i overensstemmelse med kravene i forordning (EU) nr. 452/2014 og fremsatte grundlæggende betænkeligheder angående Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltds manglende påvisning af overholdelse af kravene i artikel 3 i forordning (EU) nr. 452/2014.
On 3 April 2017, the SAAU revoked the air operator certificate of Air Company ‘Black Sea Airlines’ LLC.
Den 7. november 2016 afviste EASA derfor ansøgningen af sikkerhedsmæssige årsager.
The SAAU and International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’ were heard by the Commission and the Air Safety Committee on 25 April 2017.
Den 3. marts 2017 anmodede Kommissionen Zimbabwes civile luftfartsmyndighed (CAAZ) om oplysninger angående de foranstaltninger, myndigheden har truffet efter EASA's afvisning af TCO-ansøgningen indgivet af Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd.
Among other elements, the SAAU reported that the oversight activities on air carriers certified in Ukraine are adjusted with SAFA records as well as with any information stemming from the TCO authorisation process.
Med dette brev blev der indledt formelle samråd med CAAZ i henhold til bestemmelserne i artikel 3, stk. 2, i forordning (EF) nr. 473/2006.
The SAAU also provided information on the adoption of possible short-term actions such as suspension, limitation or revocation of the air operator certificate of air carriers in response to a rejection of an application for a TCO authorisation by EASA.
Da de sikkerhedsmæssige betænkeligheder, der fulgte af EASA's TCO-sikkerhedsvurdering af Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd, ikke var afhjulpet, fik både CAAZ og Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd den 26. april 2017 mulighed for at blive hørt af Kommissionen og Udvalget for Luftfartssikkerhed i henhold til artikel 7 i forordning (EF) nr. 2111/2005.
In addition, the SAAU provided information on long-term actions aiming at improving its internal processes related to its certification and oversight activities in respect of air carriers certified in Ukraine.
Ved høringen forelagde CAAZ bl.a. oplysninger om sine opgaver som sikkerhedstilsynsmyndighed for Air Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd.
During that hearing, elaborating on the information provided previously, International Joint-Stock Aviation Company ‘URGA’ provided additional information on the corrective measures it had taken to address the serious concerns identified by EASA as part of the TCO safety assessment, such as the continuing airworthiness management and the execution of maintenance activities.