natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Denne forordning bør indeholde regler med henblik på fastlæggelse af beliggenheden af skyldnerens aktiver, som bør finde anvendelse i forbindelse med fastlæggelsen af, hvilke aktiver der henhører under hovedinsolvensbehandlingen eller den sekundære insolvensbehandling, eller i situationer, der involverer tredjeparters tinglige rettigheder.
This Regulation should provide for rules to determine the location of the debtor's assets, which should apply when determining which assets belong to the main or secondary insolvency proceedings, or to situations involving third parties' rights in rem.
Navnlig bør det i denne forordning fastsættes, at europæiske patenter med ensartet retsvirkning, et EF-varemærke eller enhver anden tilsvarende rettighed såsom EF-sortsbeskyttelse eller EF-design, kun bør indgå i hovedinsolvensbehandlingen.
In particular, this Regulation should provide that European patents with unitary effect, a Community trade mark or any other similar rights, such as Community plant variety rights or Community designs, should only be included in the main insolvency proceedings.
Sekundære insolvensbehandlinger kan tjene forskellige formål ud over at beskytte lokale interesser.
Secondary insolvency proceedings can serve different purposes, besides the protection of local interests.
Der kan være tilfælde, hvor skyldnerens bo, der er under insolvensbehandling, er for kompliceret til at blive administreret under ét, eller hvor forskellene i de berørte retssystemer er så store, at der kan opstå vanskeligheder i forbindelse med udvidelsen af virkningerne efter lovgivningen i den medlemsstat, hvor insolvensbehandlingen er indledt, til de øvrige medlemsstater, hvor aktiverne befinder sig.
Cases may arise in which the insolvency estate of the debtor is too complex to administer as a unit, or the differences in the legal systems concerned are so great that difficulties may arise from the extension of effects deriving from the law of the State of the opening of proceedings to the other Member States where the assets are located.
Insolvensbehandleren for hovedinsolvensbehandlingen kan derfor indgive begæring om indledning af sekundære insolvensbehandlinger, når en effektiv forvaltning af boet, der er under insolvensbehandling, gør det påkrævet.
For that reason, the insolvency practitioner in the main insolvency proceedings may request the opening of secondary insolvency proceedings where the efficient administration of the insolvency estate so requires.
Sekundære insolvensbehandlinger kan imidlertid også lægge hindringer i vejen for en effektiv forvaltning af boet, der er under insolvensbehandling.
Secondary insolvency proceedings may also hamper the efficient administration of the insolvency estate.
Derfor fastsætter denne forordning to særlige situationer, hvor den ret, der har modtaget en begæring om indledning af en sekundær insolvensbehandling, på begæring af insolvensbehandleren for hovedinsolvensbehandlingen bør kunne udsætte eller afvise at indlede en sådan insolvensbehandling.
Therefore, this Regulation sets out two specific situations in which the court seised of a request to open secondary insolvency proceedings should be able, at the request of the insolvency practitioner in the main insolvency proceedings, to postpone or refuse the opening of such proceedings.
For det første giver denne forordning insolvensbehandleren for hovedinsolvensbehandlingen mulighed for at give lokale kreditorer tilsagn om, at de vil blive behandlet på samme måde, som hvis der var blevet indledt sekundær insolvensbehandling.
First, this Regulation confers on the insolvency practitioner in main insolvency proceedings the possibility of giving an undertaking to local creditors that they will be treated as if secondary insolvency proceedings had been opened.
Dette tilsagn skal opfylde en række betingelser, der er fastsat i denne forordning, navnlig at det godkendes med kvalificeret flertal af de lokale kreditorer.
That undertaking has to meet a number of conditions set out in this Regulation, in particular that it be approved by a qualified majority of local creditors.
Når der er givet et sådant tilsagn, bør den ret, der har modtaget en begæring om indledning af en sekundær insolvensbehandling, kunne afvise denne begæring, hvis den finder det godtgjort, at tilsagnet i tilstrækkelig grad beskytter lokale kreditorers generelle interesser.
Where such an undertaking has been given, the court seised of a request to open secondary insolvency proceedings should be able to refuse that request if it is satisfied that the undertaking adequately protects the general interests of local creditors.
Når den vurderer disse interesser, bør retten tage hensyn til, at tilsagnet er blevet godkendt med kvalificeret flertal af de lokale kreditorer.
When assessing those interests, the court should take into account the fact that the undertaking has been approved by a qualified majority of local creditors.
Med henblik på at give lokale kreditorer et tilsagn bør de aktiver og rettigheder i den medlemsstat, hvor skyldneren har et forretningssted, udgøre en underkategori af boet, der er under insolvensbehandling, og insolvensbehandleren for hovedinsolvensbehandlingen i forbindelse med udlodning af disse eller af provenuet fra realisationen af disse bør respektere den forrang, kreditorerne ville have haft, hvis en sekundær insolvensbehandling var blevet indledt i denne medlemsstat.
For the purposes of giving an undertaking to local creditors, the assets and rights located in the Member State where the debtor has an establishment should form a sub-category of the insolvency estate, and, when distributing them or the proceeds resulting from their realisation, the insolvency practitioner in the main insolvency proceedings should respect the priority rights that creditors would have had if secondary insolvency proceedings had been opened in that Member State.
National lovgivning bør, hvis det er relevant, finde anvendelse i forbindelse med godkendelse af et tilsagn.
National law should be applicable, as appropriate, in relation to the approval of an undertaking.
Nærmere bestemt bør disse fordringer, hvis afstemningsreglerne for vedtagelsen af en rekonstruktionsplan i henhold til national lovgivning kræver, at kreditorernes fordringer forhåndsgodkendes, anses for at være godkendt med henblik på afstemningen om tilsagnet.
In particular, where under national law the voting rules for adopting a restructuring plan require the prior approval of creditors' claims, those claims should be deemed to be approved for the purpose of voting on the undertaking.
Hvis der findes forskellige procedurer for vedtagelsen af rekonstruktionsplaner i henhold til national lovgivning, bør medlemsstaterne udpege den specifikke procedure, der bør være relevant i denne forbindelse.
Where there are different procedures for the adoption of restructuring plans under national law, Member States should designate the specific procedure which should be relevant in this context.
For det andet bør denne forordning give mulighed for, at retten midlertidigt kan udsætte indledningen af en sekundær insolvensbehandling, når der er bevilget en midlertidig udsættelse for individuelle fuldbyrdelsesprocedurer i hovedinsolvensbehandlingen, for at sikre effektiviteten af udsættelsen bevilget i hovedinsolvensbehandlingen.
Second, this Regulation should provide for the possibility that the court temporarily stays the opening of secondary insolvency proceedings, when a temporary stay of individual enforcement proceedings has been granted in the main insolvency proceedings, in order to preserve the efficiency of the stay granted in the main insolvency proceedings.
Retten bør kunne bevilge en midlertidig udsættelse, hvis den finder det godtgjort, at der er truffet passende foranstaltninger for at beskytte de lokale kreditorers generelle interesser.
The court should be able to grant the temporary stay if it is satisfied that suitable measures are in place to protect the general interest of local creditors.
I så fald bør alle de kreditorer, der kan blive berørt af resultatet af forhandlingerne om en rekonstruktionsplan, underrettes om forhandlingerne og have mulighed for at deltage i dem.
In such a case, all creditors that could be affected by the outcome of the negotiations on a restructuring plan should be informed of the negotiations and be allowed to participate in them.
Af hensyn til effektiv beskyttelse af lokale kreditorers interesser bør insolvensbehandleren i hovedinsolvensbehandlingen ikke uretmæssigt kunne realisere eller flytte aktiver, der befinder sig i den medlemsstat, hvor et forretningssted er beliggende, navnlig ikke, hvis formålet hermed er at forhindre, at disse kreditorer kan fyldestgøres effektivt, hvis der efterfølgende indledes en sekundær insolvensbehandling.
In order to ensure effective protection of local interests, the insolvency practitioner in the main insolvency proceedings should not be able to realise or re-locate, in an abusive manner, assets situated in the Member State where an establishment is located, in particular, with the purpose of frustrating the possibility that such interests can be effectively satisfied if secondary insolvency proceedings are opened subsequently.
Denne forordning bør ikke være til hinder for, at retterne i den medlemsstat, hvor der er indledt en sekundær insolvensbehandling, pålægger en skyldners virksomhedsledere sanktioner for overtrædelser af deres beføjelser, forudsat at disse retter har kompetence til at behandle sådanne tvister i henhold til deres nationale lovgivning.
This Regulation should not prevent the courts of a Member State in which secondary insolvency proceedings have been opened from sanctioning a debtor's directors for violation of their duties, provided that those courts have jurisdiction to address such disputes under their national law.
Hovedinsolvensbehandlingen og den sekundære insolvensbehandling kan medvirke til en effektiv behandling af skyldners bo, der er under insolvensbehandling, eller en effektiv realisation af de samlede aktiver, hvis der er et passende samarbejde mellem de aktører, der er impliceret i alle de indledte insolvensbehandlinger.
Main insolvency proceedings and secondary insolvency proceedings can contribute to the efficient administration of the debtor's insolvency estate or to the effective realisation of the total assets if there is proper cooperation between the actors involved in all the concurrent proceedings.
Et passende samarbejde indebærer et tæt samarbejde mellem de forskellige insolvensbehandlere og de implicerede retter, navnlig med fyldestgørende udveksling af oplysninger.
Proper cooperation implies the various insolvency practitioners and the courts involved cooperating closely, in particular by exchanging a sufficient amount of information.
For at sikre hovedinsolvensbehandlingens forrang bør insolvensbehandleren for denne insolvensbehandling have flere muligheder for at øve indflydelse på alle samtidige sekundære insolvensbehandlinger.
In order to ensure the dominant role of the main insolvency proceedings, the insolvency practitioner in such proceedings should be given several possibilities for intervening in secondary insolvency proceedings which are pending at the same time.
Insolvensbehandleren bør især kunne fremsætte forslag om en rekonstruktionsplan eller en tvangsakkord eller anmode om, at realisationen af aktiverne i den sekundære insolvensbehandling stilles i bero.
In particular, the insolvency practitioner should be able to propose a restructuring plan or composition or apply for a suspension of the realisation of the assets in the secondary insolvency proceedings.
Når de samarbejder, bør insolvensbehandlere og retter følge den bedste praksis for samarbejde i grænseoverskridende insolvenssager, som er opstillet i principper og retningslinjer for kommunikation og samarbejde udarbejdet af europæiske og internationale organisationer, der beskæftiger sig med konkursretlige spørgsmål, og navnlig relevante retningslinjer udarbejdet af De Forenede Nationers Kommission for International Handelsret (UNCITRAL).
When cooperating, insolvency practitioners and courts should take into account best practices for cooperation in cross-border insolvency cases, as set out in principles and guidelines on communication and cooperation adopted by European and international organisations active in the area of insolvency law, and in particular the relevant guidelines prepared by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (Uncitral).
I lyset af et sådant samarbejde bør insolvensbehandlere og retter kunne indgå aftaler og protokoller for at lette grænseoverskridende samarbejde i forbindelse med flere insolvensbehandlinger i forskellige medlemsstater vedrørende samme skyldner eller medlemmer af samme koncern, hvis dette er foreneligt med de regler, der finder anvendelse på hver af insolvensbehandlingerne.
In light of such cooperation, insolvency practitioners and courts should be able to enter into agreements and protocols for the purpose of facilitating cross-border cooperation of multiple insolvency proceedings in different Member States concerning the same debtor or members of the same group of companies, where this is compatible with the rules applicable to each of the proceedings.
Sådanne aftaler og protokoller kan have forskellig form, idet de kan være skriftlige eller mundtlige, og forskelligt anvendelsesområde, idet de kan spænde fra generiske til specifikke, og kan indgås af forskellige parter.
Such agreements and protocols may vary in form, in that they may be written or oral, and in scope, in that they may range from generic to specific, and may be entered into by different parties.
Enkle generiske aftaler kan understrege behovet for tæt samarbejde mellem parterne uden at tage specifikke spørgsmål op, mens mere detaljerede specifikke aftaler kan fastlægge en ramme af principper til regulering af flere insolvensbehandlinger, og disse aftaler kan godkendes af de involverede retter, såfremt den nationale lovgivning kræver det.
Simple generic agreements may emphasise the need for close cooperation between the parties, without addressing specific issues, while more detailed, specific agreements may establish a framework of principles to govern multiple insolvency proceedings and may be approved by the courts involved, where the national law so requires.
De kan udmønte en aftale mellem parterne om at tage eller undlade at tage visse skridt eller foranstaltninger.
They may reflect an agreement between the parties to take, or to refrain from taking, certain steps or actions.
Retterne i forskellige medlemsstater kan ligeledes samarbejde ved at koordinere udpegelsen af insolvensbehandlere.
Similarly, the courts of different Member States may cooperate by coordinating the appointment of insolvency practitioners.
I den forbindelse kan de udpege én insolvensbehandler til flere insolvensbehandlinger vedrørende samme skyldner eller til forskellige medlemmer af en koncern, forudsat at dette er foreneligt med de regler, der finder anvendelse på hver af insolvensbehandlingerne, navnlig med eventuelle krav med hensyn til insolvensbehandlerens kvalifikationer og godkendelse.
In that context, they may appoint a single insolvency practitioner for several insolvency proceedings concerning the same debtor or for different members of a group of companies, provided that this is compatible with the rules applicable to each of the proceedings, in particular with any requirements concerning the qualification and licensing of the insolvency practitioner.
Denne forordning bør sikre en effektiv administration af insolvensbehandlinger af koncernforbundne selskaber.
This Regulation should ensure the efficient administration of insolvency proceedings relating to different companies forming part of a group of companies.
Er der indledt insolvensbehandlinger angående flere selskaber i samme koncern, bør der være et passende samarbejde mellem de aktører, der er impliceret i disse insolvensbehandlinger.
Where insolvency proceedings have been opened for several companies of the same group, there should be proper cooperation between the actors involved in those proceedings.
De forskellige insolvensbehandlere og de implicerede retter bør derfor have en tilsvarende pligt til at samarbejde og kommunikere med hinanden som de insolvensbehandlere og retter, der er impliceret i hovedinsolvensbehandling og sekundære insolvensbehandlinger angående den samme skyldner.
The various insolvency practitioners and the courts involved should therefore be under a similar obligation to cooperate and communicate with each other as those involved in main and secondary insolvency proceedings relating to the same debtor.
Samarbejdet mellem insolvensbehandlerne bør ikke gå imod kreditorernes interesser i hver af insolvensbehandlingerne, og et sådant samarbejde bør sigte mod at finde en løsning, der kan skabe synergi inden for koncernen.
Cooperation between the insolvency practitioners should not run counter to the interests of the creditors in each of the proceedings, and such cooperation should be aimed at finding a solution that would leverage synergies across the group.
Indførelsen af regler om insolvensbehandling af koncerner bør ikke indskrænke en rets adgang til at indlede insolvensbehandling af flere selskaber tilhørende samme koncern i en og samme jurisdiktion, hvis retten finder, at centret for disse selskabers hovedinteresser befinder sig i en enkelt medlemsstat.
The introduction of rules on the insolvency proceedings of groups of companies should not limit the possibility for a court to open insolvency proceedings for several companies belonging to the same group in a single jurisdiction if the court finds that the centre of main interests of those companies is located in a single Member State.
I sådanne tilfælde bør retten også, hvis det er relevant, kunne udpege den samme insolvensbehandler til at forestå alle insolvensbehandlingerne, forudsat at dette ikke er uforeneligt med de regler, der finder anvendelse på dem.
In such cases, the court should also be able to appoint, if appropriate, the same insolvency practitioner in all proceedings concerned, provided that this is not incompatible with the rules applicable to them.
Med henblik på yderligere at forbedre koordineringen af insolvensbehandling af medlemmer af en koncern og for at åbne mulighed for en samordnet rekonstruktion af koncernen bør denne forordning indføre procedureregler om koordinering af insolvensbehandling af medlemmer af en koncern.
With a view to further improving the coordination of the insolvency proceedings of members of a group of companies, and to allow for a coordinated restructuring of the group, this Regulation should introduce procedural rules on the coordination of the insolvency proceedings of members of a group of companies.
En sådan koordinering bør tilstræbe at sikre en effektiv koordinering, samtidig med at hvert koncernmedlems status som særskilt juridisk person respekteres.
Such coordination should strive to ensure the efficiency of the coordination, whilst at the same time respecting each group member's separate legal personality.
En insolvensbehandler, som er udpeget til insolvensbehandling, der er indledt vedrørende et medlem af en koncern, bør kunne indgive begæring om indledning af en koordineret behandling af koncernen.
An insolvency practitioner appointed in insolvency proceedings opened in relation to a member of a group of companies should be able to request the opening of group coordination proceedings.
Hvis den lovgivning, der finder anvendelse på insolvens, kræver det, bør denne insolvensbehandler dog have opnået den nødvendige tilladelse, inden begæringen indgives.
However, where the law applicable to the insolvency so requires, that insolvency practitioner should obtain the necessary authorisation before making such a request.
Begæringen bør præcisere de vigtigste elementer af koordineringen, særlig en oversigt over koordineringsplanen, et forslag til, hvem der bør udpeges til koordinator, og en oversigt over de anslåede omkostninger ved koordineringen.
The request should specify the essential elements of the coordination, in particular an outline of the coordination plan, a proposal as to whom should be appointed as coordinator and an outline of the estimated costs of the coordination.
For at sikre, at den koordinerede behandling af koncernen er frivillig, bør de implicerede insolvensbehandlere kunne gøre indsigelse mod deres deltagelse i sagen inden for en nærmere fastsat tidsfrist.
In order to ensure the voluntary nature of group coordination proceedings, the insolvency practitioners involved should be able to object to their participation in the proceedings within a specified time period.
For at de implicerede insolvensbehandlere kan træffe en informeret beslutning om deltagelsen i den koordinerede behandling af koncernen, bør de på et tidligt tidspunkt underrettes om de vigtigste elementer af koordineringen.
In order to allow the insolvency practitioners involved to take an informed decision on participation in the group coordination proceedings, they should be informed at an early stage of the essential elements of the coordination.
Enhver insolvensbehandler, som indledningsvis gør indsigelse mod medtagelsen i den koordinerede behandling af koncernen, bør dog efterfølgende kunne anmode om at deltage i den.
However, any insolvency practitioner who initially objects to inclusion in the group coordination proceedings should be able to subsequently request to participate in them.
I så fald bør koordinatoren træffe beslutning om anmodningens antagelighed.
In such a case, the coordinator should take a decision on the admissibility of the request.
Alle insolvensbehandlere, herunder den anmodende insolvensbehandler, bør underrettes om koordinatorens beslutning og bør have mulighed for at gøre indsigelse mod denne beslutning ved den ret, som har indledt den koordinerede behandling af koncernen.
All insolvency practitioners, including the requesting insolvency practitioner, should be informed of the coordinator's decision and should have the opportunity of challenging that decision before the court which has opened the group coordination proceedings.
En koordineret behandling af en koncern bør altid tilstræbe at lette den faktiske administration af insolvensbehandlingen af koncernmedlemmerne og at have en generelt positiv virkning på kreditorerne.
Group coordination proceedings should always strive to facilitate the effective administration of the insolvency proceedings of the group members, and to have a generally positive impact for the creditors.
Denne forordning bør derfor sikre, at den ret, hvor der er indgivet begæring om koordineret behandling af en koncern, foretager en vurdering af disse kriterier, inden der indledes koordineret insolvensbehandling af koncernen.
This Regulation should therefore ensure that the court with which a request for group coordination proceedings has been filed makes an assessment of those criteria prior to opening group coordination proceedings.
Fordelene ved koordineret behandling af en koncern bør ikke overskygges af omkostningerne ved denne behandling.
The advantages of group coordination proceedings should not be outweighed by the costs of those proceedings.
Det er derfor nødvendigt at sikre, at omkostningerne ved koordineringen og den andel af disse omkostninger, der skal bæres af hvert koncernmedlem, er tilstrækkelige, forholdsmæssige og rimelige og fastsættes i overensstemmelse med den nationale lovgivning i den medlemsstat, hvor den koordinerede behandling af koncernen er indledt.
Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that the costs of the coordination, and the share of those costs that each group member will bear, are adequate, proportionate and reasonable, and are determined in accordance with the national law of the Member State in which group coordination proceedings have been opened.
De involverede insolvensbehandlere bør også på et tidligt tidspunkt i sagen have mulighed for at kontrollere disse omkostninger.
The insolvency practitioners involved should also have the possibility of controlling those costs from an early stage of the proceedings.