natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Indgives der en indsigelse inden for den frist, der er fastsat i artikel 16, stk. 2, fortsætter sagen ved de kompetente retter i udstedelsesstaten, medmindre fordringshaveren udtrykkeligt har anmodet om, at sagen i så fald hæves.
If a statement of opposition is lodged within the time limit laid down in Article 16(2), the proceedings shall continue before the competent courts of the Member State of origin unless the claimant has explicitly requested that the proceedings be terminated in that event.
Sagen fortsætter i overensstemmelse med reglerne for:
The proceedings shall continue in accordance with the rules of:
den europæiske småkravsprocedure i forordning (EF) nr. 861/2007, hvis det er relevant, eller
the European Small Claims Procedure laid down in Regulation (EC) No 861/2007, if applicable; or
en passende national civilretlig procedure.
any appropriate national civil procedure.
Har fordringshaveren ikke meddelt, hvilken af procedurerne i stk. 1, litra a) og b), vedkommende anmoder om anvendelse af i forbindelse med kravet i den retssag, der følger i tilfælde af indsigelse, eller har fordringshaveren anmodet om, at den europæiske småkravsprocedure i forordning (EF) nr. 861/2007 anvendes i forbindelse med et krav, der ikke falder ind under nævnte forordnings anvendelsesområde, overgår retssagen til en passende national civilretlig procedure, medmindre fordringshaveren udtrykkeligt har anmodet om, at en sådan overgang ikke foretages.
Where the claimant has not indicated which of the procedures listed in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 he requests to be applied to his claim in the proceedings that ensue in the event of a statement of opposition or where the claimant has requested that the European Small Claims Procedure as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 be applied to a claim that does not fall within the scope of that Regulation, the proceedings shall be transferred to the appropriate national civil procedure, unless the claimant has explicitly requested that such transfer not be made.
Har fordringshaveren forfulgt sit krav gennem den europæiske betalingspåkravsprocedure, er der intet i national lov, der berører hans stilling i en efterfølgende civil retssag.
Where the claimant has pursued his claim through the European order for payment procedure, nothing under national law shall prejudice his position in subsequent civil proceedings.
Overgangen til civil retssag som omhandlet i stk. 1, litra a) og b), er underlagt loven i udstedelsesstaten.
The transfer to civil proceedings within the meaning of points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 shall be governed by the law of the Member State of origin.
Fordringshaveren underrettes om, hvorvidt skyldneren har indgivet en indsigelse, og om en eventuel overgang til civil retssag i henhold til stk. 1.«
The claimant shall be informed of whether the defendant has lodged a statement of opposition and of any transfer to civil proceedings within the meaning of paragraph 1.’.
Artikel 25, stk. 1, affattes således:
In Article 25, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
Hvis retsafgifterne i forbindelse med en civil retssag som omhandlet i artikel 17, stk. 1, litra a) eller b), alt efter hvad der er relevant, i en medlemsstat svarer til eller er højere end dem, som finder anvendelse i forbindelse med den europæiske betalingspåkravsprocedure, må de samlede retsafgifter i forbindelse med en europæisk betalingspåkravsprocedure og den civile retssag, der følger i tilfælde af en indsigelse i overensstemmelse med artikel 17, stk. 1, ikke overstige disse retsafgifter uden en forudgående europæisk betalingspåkravsprocedure i den pågældende medlemsstat.
Where, in a Member State, the court fees for civil proceedings within the meaning of point (a) or point (b) of Article 17(1), as applicable, are equivalent to or higher than those of the European order for payment procedure, the total of the court fees for a European order for payment procedure and for the civil proceedings that ensue in the event of a statement of opposition in accordance with Article 17(1) shall not exceed the fees for those proceedings without a preceding European order for payment procedure in that Member State.
Der må ikke opkræves yderligere retsafgifter i en medlemsstat i forbindelse med den civile retssag, der følger i tilfælde af en indsigelse i overensstemmelse med artikel 17, stk. 1, litra a) eller b), alt efter hvad der er relevant, hvis retsafgifterne i forbindelse med sådanne retssager i den pågældende medlemsstat er lavere end dem, som finder anvendelse i forbindelse med den europæiske betalingspåkravsprocedure.«
No additional court fees may be charged in a Member State for the civil proceedings that ensue in the event of a statement of opposition in accordance with point (a) or point (b) of Article 17(1), as applicable, if the court fees for such proceedings in that Member State are lower than those for the European order for payment procedure.’.
Kommissionen tillægges beføjelse til at vedtage delegerede retsakter i overensstemmelse med artikel 31 vedrørende ændring af bilag I-VII.«
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 31 concerning the amendment of Annexes I to VII.’.
Beføjelsen til at vedtage delegerede retsakter, jf. artikel 30, tillægges Kommissionen for en ubegrænset periode fra den 13. januar 2016.
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 30 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from 13 January 2016.
Den i artikel 30 omhandlede delegation af beføjelser kan til enhver tid tilbagekaldes af Europa-Parlamentet eller Rådet.
The delegation of power referred to in Article 30 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
En delegeret retsakt vedtaget i henhold til artikel 30 træder kun i kraft, hvis hverken Europa-Parlamentet eller Rådet har gjort indsigelse inden for en frist på to måneder fra meddelelsen af den pågældende retsakt til Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet, eller hvis Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet inden udløbet af denne frist begge har informeret Kommissionen om, at de ikke agter at gøre indsigelse.
A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 30 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object.
Den anvendes fra den 14. juli 2017 med undtagelse af artikel 1, nr. 16), om ændring af artikel 25 i forordning (EF) nr. 861/2007, som anvendes fra den 14. januar 2017.
It shall apply from 14 July 2017 with the exception of point (16) of Article 1, amending Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 861/2007, which shall apply from 14 January 2017.
EUT C 226 af 16.7.2014, s. 43.
OJ C 226, 16.7.2014, p. 43.
Europa-Parlamentets holdning af 7.10.2015 (endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT) og Rådets afgørelse af 3.12.2015.
Position of the European Parliament of 7 October 2015 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 3 December 2015.
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 861/2007 af 11. juli 2007 om indførelse af en europæisk småkravsprocedure (EUT L 199 af 31.7.2007, s. 1).
Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p. 1).
Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1206/2001 af 28. maj 2001 om samarbejde mellem medlemsstaternes retter om bevisoptagelse på det civil- og handelsretlige område (EFT L 174 af 27.6.2001, s. 1).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (OJ L 174, 27.6.2001, p. 1).
Rådets direktiv 2003/8/EF af 27. januar 2003 om forbedret adgang til domstolene i grænseoverskridende tvister gennem fastsættelse af fælles mindsteregler for retshjælp i forbindelse med tvister af denne art (EFT L 26 af 31.1.2003, s. 41).
Council Directive 2003/8/EC of 27 January 2003 to improve access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing minimum common rules relating to legal aid for such disputes (OJ L 26, 31.1.2003, p. 41).
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1896/2006 af 12. december 2006 om indførelse af en europæisk betalingspåkravsprocedure (EUT L 399 af 30.12.2006, s. 1).
Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure (OJ L 399, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 1215/2012 af 12. december 2012 om retternes kompetence og om anerkendelse og fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser på det civil- og handelsretlige område (EUT L 351 af 20.12.2012, s. 1).«
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1).’.
Formand
This Regulation shall apply, in cross-border cases as defined in Article 3, to civil and commercial matters, whatever the nature of the court or tribunal, where the value of a claim does not exceed EUR 5000 at the time when the claim form is received by the court or tribunal with jurisdiction, excluding all interest, expenses and disbursements.
Formand
It shall not extend, in particular, to revenue, customs or administrative matters or to the liability of the State for acts and omissions in the exercise of State authority (acta jure imperii).
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 of the European Parliament and of the Council
om ændring af protokol nr. 3 vedrørende statutten for Den Europæiske Unions Domstol
amending Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union
under henvisning til traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde, særlig artikel 254, stk. 1, og artikel 281, stk. 2,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 254 and the second paragraph of Article 281 thereof,
under henvisning til udtalelser fra Europa-Kommissionen [1],
Having regard to the opinions of the European Commission [1],
Som følge af den gradvise udvidelse af Rettens kompetence siden dens oprettelse er Retten i dag stillet over for et konstant stigende antal sager.
As a consequence of the progressive expansion of its jurisdiction since its creation, the number of cases before the General Court is now constantly increasing.
Sagsbehandlingstiden synes på nuværende tidspunkt ikke at være acceptabel fra procesparternes synsvinkel, navnlig set i lyset af de krav, som er fastsat i artikel 47 i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder og i artikel 6 i den europæiske konvention til beskyttelse af menneskerettigheder og grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder.
At present, the duration of proceedings does not appear to be acceptable from the point of view of litigants, particularly in the light of the requirements set out in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Den situation, som Retten befinder sig i, skyldes bl.a. stigningen i antallet og forskelligartetheden af Unionens institutioners, organers, kontorers og agenturers retsakter samt omfanget og kompleksiteten af de sager, som indbringes for Retten, navnlig inden for områderne konkurrence, statsstøtte og intellektuel ejendomsret.
The situation in which the General Court finds itself has causes relating, inter alia, to the increase in the number and variety of legal acts of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, as well as to the volume and complexity of the cases brought before the General Court, particularly in the areas of competition, State aid and intellectual property.
Muligheden af at oprette specialretter som omhandlet i artikel 257 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde (TEUF) er ikke blevet taget op.
The option of setting up specialised courts as provided for in Article 257 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) has not been taken up.
Der bør følgelig træffes passende foranstaltninger af organisatorisk, strukturel og proceduremæssig art, herunder navnlig en forøgelse af antallet af dommere, for at søge at løse denne situation.
Consequently, suitable measures of an organisational, structural and procedural nature, including, in particular, an increase in the number of Judges, should be taken to address this situation.
Anvendelse af den mulighed, der er fastsat i traktaterne, for at øge antallet af dommere i Retten, ville muliggøre en reduktion inden for kort tid både af antallet af verserende sager og af den uforholdsmæssigt langvarige sagsbehandlingstid ved Retten.
Making use of the possibility provided for by the Treaties of increasing the number of Judges of the General Court would allow for a reduction within a short time of both the volume of pending cases and the excessive duration of proceedings before the General Court.
Under hensyntagen til udviklingen i Rettens arbejdsbyrde bør antallet af dommere fastsættes til 56 efter gennemførelsen af en trefaset procedure, hvorved der udnævnes to dommere efter forslag fra hver enkelt medlemsstat, idet der på intet tidspunkt må være mere end to dommere ved Retten, som er udnævnt efter forslag fra samme medlemsstat.
Taking into account the evolution of the workload of the General Court, the number of Judges should be fixed at 56 at the end of a three-stage process, two Judges being appointed upon a proposal by each of the Member States, it being understood that at no point of time can there be more than two Judges sitting at the General Court appointed upon a proposal by the same Member State.
Det i artikel 255 i TEUF omhandlede udvalg tager navnlig hensyn til kandidaternes uafhængighed, upartiskhed, fagkundskab og faglige og personlige egnethed.
The panel provided for in Article 255 TFEU takes into account, in particular, independence, impartiality, expertise and the professional and personal suitability of the candidates.
Med henblik på hurtigt at mindske ophobningen af verserende sager bør yderligere 12 dommere tiltræde ved denne forordnings ikrafttræden.
In order to rapidly reduce the backlog of pending cases, twelve additional Judges should take office upon entry into force of this Regulation.
I september 2016 bør beføjelserne til at træffe afgørelse i første instans i EU-personalesager og de syv dommerembeder ved Retten for EU-personalesager (»Personaleretten«) overføres til Retten på grundlag af den allerede bebudede lovgivningsmæssige anmodning fra Domstolen.
In September 2016, first instance jurisdiction in European Union civil service cases and the seven posts of the Judges sitting at the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (‘Civil Service Tribunal’) should be transferred to the General Court, on the basis of the legislative request already announced by the Court of Justice.
I denne anmodning vil man behandle de nærmere ordninger vedrørende overførslen af Personalerettens syv dommerembeder, herunder personale og ressourcer.
That request will consider the modalities of the transfer of the seven posts of Judges of the Civil Service Tribunal, including staff and resources.
I september 2019 bør de resterende ni dommere tiltræde.
In September 2019, the remaining nine Judges should take office.
For at sikre omkostningseffektivitet bør dette ikke medføre ansættelse af yderligere referendarer eller andet assisterende personale.
In order to ensure cost-effectiveness, this should not entail the recruitment of additional legal secretaries or other support staff.
Tiltag til intern omorganisering inden for institutionen bør sikre en effektiv anvendelse af det eksisterende personale, som bør være det samme for alle dommere, medmindre Retten bestemmer andet i afgørelserne vedrørende sin interne organisation.
Internal re-organisation measures within the institution should make sure that efficient use is made of existing human resources, which should be equal for all Judges, without prejudice to the decisions taken by the General Court concerning its internal organisation.
Det er meget vigtigt at sikre, at mænd og kvinder er ligeligt repræsenteret ved Retten.
It is of high importance to ensure gender balance within the General Court.
Med henblik på at nå dette mål bør delvise nybesættelser af dommerembederne ved Retten tilrettelægges på en sådan måde, at medlemsstaternes regeringer gradvist begynder at foreslå to dommere til den samme delvise nybesættelse og derfor bestræber sig på at vælge en kvinde og en mand, forudsat at de betingelser og procedurer, der er fastlagt i traktaterne, er overholdt.
In order to achieve that objective, partial replacements in that Court should be organised in such a way that the governments of Member States gradually begin to nominate two Judges for the same partial replacement with the aim therefore of choosing one woman and one man, provided that the conditions and procedures laid down by the Treaties are respected.
Det er nødvendigt at tilpasse bestemmelserne i statutten for Den Europæiske Unions Domstol om den delvise nybesættelse af dommerembederne og generaladvokaternes embeder, der finder sted hvert tredje år, i overensstemmelse hermed.
It is necessary to adapt accordingly the provisions of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the partial replacement of Judges and Advocates-General that takes place every three years.
Som Den Europæiske Unions Domstol allerede har bebudet, vil den som opfølgning på reformen af Retten forelægge årlige tal om sin judicielle virksomhed og om nødvendigt foreslå passende foranstaltninger.
As the Court of Justice of the European Union has already announced, it will, as a follow-up to the reform of the General Court, present yearly figures on its judicial activity and, if necessary, suggest appropriate measures.
I anden og tredje fase af Rettens udvidelse vil der blive foretaget en vurdering af Rettens situation, hvilket eventuelt kan føre til visse tilpasninger, navnlig med hensyn til Domstolens administrative udgifter.
At the second and third stages of the enlargement of the General Court, an assessment of the situation of the General Court will take place which, if necessary, could lead to certain adjustments, notably in terms of administrative expenditure of the Court.
Protokol nr. 3 vedrørende statutten for Den Europæiske Unions Domstol bør derfor ændres i overensstemmelse hermed —
Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union should therefore be amended accordingly,
Ved den delvise nybesættelse af dommerembederne, der finder sted hvert tredje år, afgår halvdelen af dommerne.
When, every three years, the Judges are partially replaced, one half of the number of Judges shall be replaced.
Hvis antallet af dommere er et ulige antal, er det antal af dommere, der afgår, skiftevis det antal, der er lige over halvdelen af antallet af dommere, og det antal, der er lige under halvdelen.
If the number of Judges is an uneven number, the number of Judges who shall be replaced shall alternately be the number which is the next above one half of the number of Judges and the number which is next below one half.
Stk. 1 finder ligeledes anvendelse ved den delvise nybesættelse af generaladvokaternes embeder, der finder sted hvert tredje år.«.
The first paragraph shall also apply when the Advocates-General are partially replaced, every three years.’.
Retten består af:
The General Court shall consist of:
40 dommere pr. 25. december 2015
40 Judges as from 25 December 2015;
47 dommere pr. 1. september 2016
47 Judges as from 1 September 2016;
to dommere pr. medlemsstat pr. 1. september 2019.«.
two Judges per Member State as from 1 September 2019.’.
Embedsperioden for de yderligere dommere ved Retten, som skal udnævnes i henhold til artikel 48 i protokol nr. 3 vedrørende statutten for Den Europæiske Unions Domstol, er som følger:
The term of office of the additional Judges of the General Court to be appointed pursuant to Article 48 of Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union shall be as follows:
Domstolen forelægger om fornødent lovgivningsmæssige anmodninger til ændring af dens statut i overensstemmelse hermed.
The term of office of three of the seven additional Judges to be appointed as from 1 September 2016 shall end on 31 August 2019.
Senest 26. december 2017 udarbejder Domstolen en rapport til Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet og Kommissionen om mulige ændringer af kompetencefordelingen for præjudicielle afgørelser i henhold til artikel 267 i TEUF.
Those three Judges shall be chosen in such a way that the governments of three Member States nominate two Judges for the partial replacement of the General Court in 2019.
Rapporten ledsages om fornødent af lovgivningsforslag.
The term of office of the other four Judges shall end on 31 August 2022;
Artikel 4
The term of office of four of the nine additional Judges to be appointed as from 1 September 2019 shall end on 31 August 2022.
Denne forordning træder i kraft dagen efter offentliggørelsen i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende.
Those four Judges shall be chosen in such a way that the governments of four Member States nominate two Judges for the partial replacement of the General Court in 2022.
Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i hver medlemsstat.
The term of office of the other five Judges shall end on 31 August 2025.
Udfærdiget i Strasbourg, den 16. december 2015.
Article 3
På Europa-Parlamentets vegne
By 26 December 2020, the Court of Justice shall draw up a report, using an external consultant, for the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the functioning of the General Court.
N. Schmit
In particular, that report shall focus on the efficiency of the General Court, the necessity and effectiveness of the increase to 56 Judges, the use and effectiveness of resources and the further establishment of specialised chambers and/or other structural changes.
På Rådets vegne
Where appropriate, the Court of Justice shall make legislative requests to amend its Statute accordingly.
Udtalelse af 30.9.2011 (EUT C 335, 16.11.2011, s. 20) og udtalelse af 12.11.2015 (endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT).
By 26 December 2017, the Court of Justice shall draw up a report for the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on possible changes to the distribution of competence for preliminary rulings under Article 267 TFEU.
Europa-Parlamentets holdning af 15.4.2014 (endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT) og Rådets førstebehandlingsholdning af 23.6.2015 (EUT C 239 af 21.7.2015, s. 14).
The report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by legislative requests.
Europa-Parlamentets holdning af 28.10.2015 (endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT) og Rådets afgørelse af 3.12.2015.
Article 4
Embedsperioden for seks af de 12 yderligere dommere, der skal udnævnes pr. 25. december 2015, udløber den 31. august 2016.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Disse seks dommere udvælges ved, at seks medlemsstaters regeringer indstiller to dommere med henblik på den delvise nybesættelse af Rettens dommerembeder i 2016.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Embedsperioden for de seks andre dommere udløber den 31. august 2019.
Done at Strasbourg, 16 December 2015.
Embedsperioden for tre af de syv yderligere dommere, der skal udnævnes pr. 1. september 2016, udløber den 31. august 2019.
For the European Parliament
Disse tre dommere udvælges ved, at tre medlemsstaters regeringer indstiller to dommere med henblik på den delvise nybesættelse af Rettens dommerembeder i 2019.
The President
Embedsperioden for de fire andre dommere udløber den 31. august 2022.
For the Council