natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Virksomheden påstod derimod blot, at justeringen skulle svare til justeringen for beregning af eksportprisen, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 9.
The claim was therefore rejected and recitals (50) to (54) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Påstanden blev derfor afvist.
Comparison
Dumpingmargener
The exporting producer also claimed a level of trade adjustment under Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation arguing that domestic sales were made by the related traders to end-users whereas export sales were de facto constructed as a price to distributors because the Commission deducted the SG&A and profit margins of the related traders in the Union under Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Som følge af ændringerne til den normale værdi, jf. betragtning 21, blev de endelige dumpingmargener for Korea ændret som følger:
The fact that the export price was constructed under Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation does not imply that the level of trade at which the export price was determined changed.
Land
The basis for the constructed export price remains the price charged to end-users.
Virksomhed
A level of trade adjustment is not warranted in this case as the exporting producer was selling at the same level of trade on both the domestic market and on the Union market.
Endelig dumpingmargen
In any event, the exporting producer did not provide evidence that the alleged difference in levels of trade had affected price comparability, as demonstrated by consistent and distinct differences in functions and prices of the seller for the different levels of trade in the domestic market of the exporting country.
Alle andre virksomheder
Rather, it only claimed that the adjustment should be equal to the adjustment made under Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation for constructing the export price.
Folkerepublikken Kina
This claim was therefore rejected.
Referenceland
Dumping margins
Der blev ikke modtaget flere bemærkninger om anvendelsen af Korea som referenceland.
As a result of the amendments made to the normal value according to recital (21) above, the definitive dumping margins for Korea are amended as follows:
Kommissionen bekræfter konklusionerne i betragtning 65-71 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Country
Den normale værdi for de to eksporterende producenter i Kina blev fastsat på grundlag af prisen eller den beregnede normale værdi i referencelandet, i dette tilfælde Korea, i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra a).
Company
Den normale værdi for de kinesiske virksomheder blev ændret i overensstemmelse med ændringen af den normale værdi for Korea, jf. betragtning 21.
Definitive dumping margin
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende eksportprisen, bekræftes betragtning 73 og 74 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
All other companies
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende sammenligningen mellem den normale værdi og eksportprisen, bekræftes betragtning 75-78 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The People's Republic of China
På grundlag af deres spørgeskemabesvarelser fastslog Kommissionen i betragtning 80 i forordningen om midlertidig told, at de to samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter var forretningsmæssigt forbundet ved fælles ejerskab.
Analogue country
Der blev derfor midlertidigt fastlagt en enkelt dumpingmargen for de to virksomheder på grundlag af det vejede gennemsnit af deres individuelle dumpingmargener.
No further comments were received on the use of the Republic of Korea as an analogue country.
De to kinesiske samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter (Baosteel og WISCO) anfægtede begge Kommissionens beslutning om at behandle dem som forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomheder, som derfor er pålagt én vejet gennemsnitlig dumpingtold.
The Commission confirms the findings in recitals (65) to (71) of the Provisional Regulation.
De påstod, at de er konkurrenter både på hjemmemarkedet og på eksportmarkeder.
The normal value for the two exporting producers in the PRC was determined on the basis of the price or constructed normal value in the analogue country, in this case Korea, in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the Basic Regulation.
Kommissionen gentog, at de to samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter er forretningsmæssigt forbundet gennem fælles ejerskab.
The normal value of the Chinese companies was amended in accordance with the amendment of the normal value determined for Korea, as explained in recital (21) above.
I forbindelse med den aktuelle sag ville disse virksomheder imidlertid have ringe interesse i at koordinere deres eksportaktiviteter efter indførelsen af foranstaltningerne, idet foranstaltningerne, jf. betragtning 175 og 176, består af en variabel told baseret på den samme minimumsimportpris for alle eksporterende producenter.
In the absence of any further comments with regard to the export price, recitals (73) and (74) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
I den endelige fase fastslog Kommissionen derfor, at det ikke er nødvendigt at konkludere, om de to virksomheder bør betragtes som en enkelt enhed jf. grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 5.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the comparison of the normal value and the export prices, recitals (75) to (78) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Med henblik på den nuværende undersøgelse blev der derfor fastlagt to separate dumpingmargener.
Based on their questionnaire replies, the Commission established in recital (80) of the provisional Regulation that the two cooperating exporting producers were related through common ownership.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse påstod klageren, at de to individuelle toldsatser for de to kinesiske eksporterende producenter kunne føre til koordinerede eksportaktiviteter, når priserne kommer under minimumsimportprisen.
A single dumping margin was therefore provisionally established for the two companies on the basis of the weighted average of their individual dumping margins.
Klageren påstod, at der burde fastsættes én enkelt toldsats for begge virksomheder.
Both cooperating Chinese exporting producers (Baosteel and WISCO) contested the decision of the Commission to treat them as related companies and therefore having one weighted average dumping duty.
Under de særlige omstændigheder i denne sag har Kommissionen, jf. ovenfor, dog indikationer af, at de internationale priser sandsynligvis vil være højere end minimumsimportpriserne på mellemlang til lang sigt.
They argued that they compete both on the domestic market and on export markets.
Kommissionen mener derfor, at risikoen for koordinering mellem de to eksporterende producenter er ubetydelig, og at muligheden for en midlertidig undersøgelse i tilfælde af en ændring i omstændighederne er en mere hensigtsmæssig løsning på problemet vedrørende denne risiko.
The Commission reiterates that the two cooperating exporting producers are related through common state ownership.
Samarbejdsgraden var høj, da importen fra de to samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter udgjorde 100 % af den samlede eksport fra Kina til Unionen i UP.
However, in the circumstances of this case, these companies would have little interest to coordinate their export activities after the imposition of measures in view of the fact that, as set out in detail in recitals (175) and (176) below, the measures consist of a variable duty based on the same minimum import price for all exporting producers.
På dette grundlag besluttede Kommissionen at fastlægge den landsdækkende dumpingmargen på niveauet for den samarbejdsvillige virksomhed med den højeste dumpingmargen.
Therefore at the definitive stage the Commission considered that it is not necessary to conclude whether the two companies should be treated as a single entity under Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
På dette grundlag blev de endelige dumpingmargener for Folkerepublikken Kina ændret som følger:
For the purposes of the current investigation, two separate dumping margins were therefore established.
Folkerepublikken Kina
Following final disclosure the complainant argued that two individual duty rates for the two Chinese exporting producers could lead to coordinated export activities when prices fall below the minimum import price (MIP).
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes fastsættelsen af den normale værdi i betragtning 84 og 85 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
They claimed that one single duty rate for both should be established.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes fastsættelsen af eksportprisen i betragtning 86-88 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
However, as mentioned above, in the particular circumstances of this case the Commission has indications that international prices are likely to remain above the MIPs in the medium to long term.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende sammenligningen mellem den normale værdi og eksportprisen, bekræftes betragtning 89-92 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Accordingly, it finds the risk of coordination between the two exporting producers to be insignificant, and that the possibility of an interim review in case of a change in circumstances is a more proportionate way to address this risk.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende dumpingmargenerne, bekræftes betragtning 93 og 95 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The level of cooperating was high as the imports of the two cooperating exporting producers constituted 100 % of the total exports from the PRC to the Union during the IP.
Den Russiske Føderation
On this basis, the Commission decided to establish the country-wide dumping margin at the level of the cooperating company with the highest dumping margin.
Den russiske eksporterende producent påstod, at der burde foretages en justering af den normale værdi under hensyntagen til, at varer, der ikke er af førstesortering, blev eksporteret til EU-markedet til lavere priser end varer af førstesortering.
People's Republic of China
Kommissionen overvejede muligheden for justeringer af den normale værdi for produkter, der ikke er af førstesortering.
Japan
Det skal bemærkes, at der på den eksporterende producents anmodning blev foretaget en differentiering i den indledende fase mellem førstesorterings- og ikke-førstesorteringsvarer, hvorefter priserne og omkostningerne for hver kvalitet blev adskilt for at sikre en rimelig sammenligning.
In the absence of any comments, the determination of the normal value, as set out in recitals (84) and (85) of the provisional Regulation, is confirmed.
Differentieringen med henblik på en rimelig sammenligning mellem den normale værdi og eksportprisen skal bevares.
In the absence of any comments, the determination of the export price, as set out in recitals (86) to (88) of the provisional Regulation, is confirmed.
Der er imidlertid intet grundlag for en justering af den normale værdi som sådan i form af en reduktion af produktionsomkostningerne for ikke-førstesorteringsvarer.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the comparison of the normal value and the export prices, recitals (89) to (92) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
En sådan justering ville betyde, at en væsentlig del af omkostningerne ikke kunne allokeres til den pågældende vare, selv om de blev afholdt i relation til denne vare.
In the absence of any further comments with regard to dumping margins recitals (93) to (95) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Den normale værdi for alle varetyper blev beregnet på grundlag af de faktiske data, som blev indsendt af den eksporterende producent og kontrolleret under kontrolbesøget.
The Russian Federation
Kommissionen kontrollerede fordelingen af omkostningerne, og der er intet grundlag for en kunstig fordeling af disse omkostninger eller andre justeringer.
All production of the product concerned in Russia comprised of conventional GOES and both prime and non-prime qualities were sold on the Union market.
Der tages nødvendigvis hensyn til eventuelle forskelle i priserne mellem de forskellige varetyper, da den normale værdi fastlægges pr. varetype.
The Russian exporting producer claimed that an adjustment to the normal value should be made to take account of the fact that non-primary grades were exported to the Union market at lower prices than primary grades.
Denne påstand bør derfor afvises.
The possibility of adjustments to the normal value for non-primary grades was considered by the Commission.
Virksomheden påstod, at forskellene i dumpingmargenerne mellem førstesorteringsvarer og ikke-førstesorteringsvarer er bevis nok i sig selv.
It should be pointed out that, as requested by the exporting producer, a differentiation was made at the provisional stage between primary and non-primary grades whereby the prices and costs of each grade were separated to ensure a fair comparison.
Det er imidlertid normalt, at forskellige grupper af varetyper kan have forskellige dumpingmargener.
This differentiation for the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between normal value and export price is to be maintained.
En forskel i dumpingmargen kan ikke berettige en justering af den normale værdi.
However, an adjustment to the normal value itself in terms of a reduction to the cost of production of non-primary grades is not warranted.
Denne påstand bør derfor også afvises.
Such an adjustment would mean that a substantial proportion of costs would not be allocated to the product concerned while they were incurred in relation to that product.
EU-erhvervsgrenen påstod, at Kommissionen begik en fejl ved ikke at foretage justeringer af de russiske producenters produktionsomkostninger i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 5.
The normal value for all product types was calculated on the basis of actual data submitted by the exporting producer and verified on spot.
Den påstod desuden, at hvis Kommissionen konkluderede, at de russiske producenter opkræver de samme priser inden for gruppen som ved eksternt salg, så er spørgsmålet, om transaktionspriserne inden for gruppen med rimelighed afspejler de fulde omkostninger i forbindelse med den pågældende vare.
The Commission verified the distribution of costs and there are no grounds to justify an artificial distribution of such costs or other adjustments.
Kommissionen sammenlignede disse priser med tredjeparters priser og fastslog på dette grundlag, at købspriserne for råvarer hos de to forretningsmæssigt forbundne russiske producenter blev foretaget til markedspriser i undersøgelsesperioden og derved afspejlede normale købsomkostninger.
Any differences in prices between different product types are necessarily accounted for as normal value is determined by product type.
Desuden viste undersøgelsen ingen tegn på, at de fulde omkostninger ikke blev afspejlet i prisfastsættelsen.
This claim should therefore be rejected.
Det blev derfor ikke fundet nødvendigt at foretage justeringer.
The company claimed that differences in dumping margins between primary grades and non-primary grades prove the point.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende den normale værdi, bekræftes betragtning 98 og 99 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
However, it is quite normal for different groups of product types to have different dumping margins than others.
Den russiske eksporterende producent påstod, at eksporten af tredjesorteringsmaterialer burde udelukkes fra dumpingberegningen.
A difference in dumping margin cannot justify an adjustment of the normal value.
Da tredjesorteringsmaterialer imidlertid også er den pågældende vare, er der intet grundlag for at udelukke disse varer.
This claim should therefore be rejected as well.
Den russiske producent påstod, at justeringerne for den forretningsmæssigt forbundne importørs (Novex's) fortjeneste og SA&G ikke er berettiget og udtalte, at den ikke er enig i Kommissionens fortolkning af grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 8 og 9, i denne henseende.
The Union industry claimed that the Commission erred by making no adjustments to the Russian producers' costs of production pursuant to Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Den russiske eksporterende producent påstod, at en justering for SA&G og fortjeneste i henhold til artikel 2 stk. 9, kun er berettiget, når varen ifølge salgsbetingelserne leveres fortoldet.
It further submitted that even if the Commission concluded that the Russian producers charge similar prices within the group compared to those of external sales, the question is whether the transaction prices within the group reasonably reflect the full costs associated with the product in question.
Når varer derimod sælges ufortoldet, er der intet grundlag for at fratrække SA&G og fortjeneste, jf. artikel 2, stk. 8.
The Commission compared these prices with prices to third parties and, on this basis, established that the purchase prices for raw materials by the two related Russian producers were made at market prices in the investigation period and therefore reflected normal purchase costs.
Den eksporterende producent påstod desuden, at Novex optrådte som »eksportafdeling« for NLMK Group, at Novex ikke udførte nogen importfunktioner og ikke afholdt omkostninger, der »normalt afholdes af en importør«.
Furthermore, the investigation did not reveal any indications that the full costs were not reflected in the setting of the prices.
Som anført i forordningen om midlertidig told og i modsætning til påstandene fastslog undersøgelsen imidlertid, at Novex udførte de samme importfunktioner for alt salg af den pågældende vare i undersøgelsesperioden.
No adjustment was therefore considered necessary.
Faktisk udførte Novex disse funktioner for langt flere stålvarer end blot den pågældende vare.
In the absence of any further comments with regard to normal value recitals (98) and (99) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
De forskellige handelsbetingelser (DDP, DAP, CIF — leveret fortoldet, leveret til sted, CIF) ændrer ikke den kendsgerning, at Novex fungerede som en forretningsmæssigt forbundet importør til EU-markedet for alle transaktioner.
The Russian exporting producer claimed that exports of third grade material should be excluded from the dumping calculation.
Der blev ikke fremlagt beviser, der kunne ændre denne konklusion.
However, as third grade material is also product concerned, there is no basis to exclude these products.
Det bekræftes derfor, at der bør foretages justeringer for SA&G og fortjeneste i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 9.
The Russian producer claimed that the adjustments for the profit and SGA of the related importer (Novex) are not warranted and stated that it does not agree with the Commission's interpretation of Articles 2(8) and 2(9) of the basic Regulation in this regard.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse gentog den russiske eksporterende producent sin påstand om, at justeringen i henhold til artikel 2, stk. 9, ikke er berettiget for salg DDU/DAP (leveret ufortoldet/leveret til sted).
The Russian exporting producer argued that an adjustment for SGA and profit under Article 2(9) is only warranted where the terms of sales require that a product be delivered with duties paid.
Der blev dog ikke fremlagt nye beviser til støtte for denne påstand.
On the other hand, when products are sold duty unpaid, Article 2(8) applies, that is to say no deduction of SGA and profit is warranted.
Kommissionen fastholder, at alle salgstransaktioner bør justeres i henhold til artikel 2, stk. 9, da Novex som forklaret i forordningen om midlertidig told fungerede som importør for alle transaktioner, og da de russiske eksporterende producenters priser ved salg til Novex var upålidelige på grund af forholdet mellem dem.
The exporting producer further claimed that Novex acted as ‘an exporting arm’ of the NLMK Group, Novex did not perform any import functions and it did not incur costs ‘normally born by an importer’.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende eksportprisen, bekræftes betragtning 100 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
However, as explained in the provisional Regulation and contrary to the claims, the investigation established that Novex did perform the same import functions for all sales of the product concerned during the investigation period.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende sammenligningen, bekræftes betragtning 101 og 102 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In fact, Novex performed such functions for a much larger range of steel products than simply the product concerned.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende dumpingmargenerne, bekræftes betragtning 103-105 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The different incoterms (DDP, DAP or CIF) do not alter the fact that Novex was operating as a related importer to the Union market for all transactions.
Amerikas Forenede Stater
No evidence was provided that could invalidate this finding.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende den normale værdi i USA, bekræftes betragtning 107 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
It is therefore confirmed that adjustments for SGA and profit should be applied in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes fastsættelsen af eksportprisen i betragtning 108-111 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Following final disclosure the Russian exporting producer reiterated its claim that the adjustment under Article 2(9) is not warranted for sales made on a DDU/DAP basis.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende sammenligningen mellem den normale værdi og eksportprisen, bekræftes konklusionen i betragtning 112 og 113 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
However, no new evidence was submitted to support the claim.
Der blev ikke fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende Kommissionens midlertidige konklusioner om den samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producent.
The Commission maintains its view that all sales should be adjusted in accordance with Article 2(9) because, as explained in the provisional regulation, Novex was operating as an importer for all transactions and the prices from the Russian exporting producers to Novex were unreliable because of the relationship between them.
De dumpingmargener, der er fastsat i betragtning 114-116 i forordningen om midlertidig told, bekræftes derfor.
In the absence of any further comments with regard to export price recital (100) of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Dumpingmargener for alle de pågældende lande
In the absence of any further comments with regard to the comparison, recitals (101) and (102) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
På grundlag af ovenstående fastsættes de endelige dumpingmargener til følgende i procent af cif-prisen, Unionens grænse, ufortoldet, som følger:
In the absence of any further comments with regard to dumping margins recitals (103)-(105) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Den Russiske Føderation
The United States of America
OJSC Novolipetsk Steel, Lipetsk, VIZ Steel, Ekaterinburg
In the absence of comments with regard to the normal value in the United States of America, the findings in recital (107) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
USA
In the absence of any comments, the determination of the export price, as set out in recitals (108) to (111) of the provisional Regulation, is confirmed.
D. SKADE
In the absence of any comments with regard to the comparison of the normal value and the export prices, recitals (112) and (113) of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Definition af EU-erhvervsgrenen og EU-produktionen
No comments have been made on the Commission's provisional findings with regard to the cooperating exporting producer.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende definitionen af EU-erhvervsgrenen og EU-produktionen, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 117 og 118 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Therefore, the dumping margins, as set out in recitals (114) to (116) of the provisional Regulation, are confirmed.
EU-forbruget
Dumping margins concerning all countries concerned
En japansk eksporterende producent påstod, at det ikke er hensigtsmæssigt at anvende intervaller for EU-forbruget, da data vedrørende EU-forbruget principielt ikke bør hemmeligholdes.
On the basis of the above, the definitive dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are: