natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den forsvandt næsten i 2011, 2012 og 2013 og tegnede sig kun for ca. 5 % af den samlede import i rapporteringsperioden 2014.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 871/2013 of 2 September 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 on imports of molybdenum wire, containing by weight at least 99,95 % of molybdenum, of which the maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeds 1,35 mm but does not exceed 4,0 mm, originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of molybdenum wire, containing by weight at least 97 % of molybdenum, of which the maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeds 1,35 mm but does not exceed 4,0 mm, originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 243, 12.9.2013, p. 2).
Den blev erstattet af den omgåelsesimport, der var blevet fastlagt i den anden antiomgåelsesundersøgelse i årene 2010 til 2012.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/395 of 10 March 2015 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People's Republic of China by imports of certain slightly modified molybdenum wires, and making such imports subject to registration (OJ L 66, 11.3.2015, p. 4).
Generaldirektoratet for Handel
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1247/2009 of 17 December 2009 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 336, 18.12.2009, p. 16).
Europa-Kommissionen
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1236/2012 of 19 December 2012 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People's Republic of China by imports of certain slightly modified molybdenum wires, containing by weight 97 % or more but less than 99,95 % of molybdenum, originating in the People's Republic of China, and making such imports subject to registration (OJ L 350, 20.12.2012, p. 51).
Direktorat H
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 871/2013 of 2 September 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 on imports of molybdenum wire, containing by weight at least 99,95 % of molybdenum, of which the maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeds 1,35 mm but does not exceed 4,0 mm, originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of molybdenum wire, containing by weight at least 97 % of molybdenum, of which the maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeds 1,35 mm but does not exceed 4,0 mm, originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 243, 12.9.2013, p. 2), recital 36.
Kontor: CHAR 04/039
CM Chemiemetall GmbH, Niels-Bohr-Str.
Formand
The investigation period covered the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014.
Kommissionens gennemførelsesforordning (EU) 2015/1953
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1953
om indførelse af en endelig antidumpingtold på importen af visse kornorienterede fladvalsede produkter af silicium-elektrisk stål med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina, Japan, Republikken Korea, Den Russiske Føderation og Amerikas Forenede Stater
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel originating in the People's Republic of China, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the United States of America
under henvisning til Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1225/2009 af 30. november 2009 om beskyttelse mod dumpingimport fra lande, der ikke er medlemmer af Det Europæiske Fællesskab (»grundforordningen«) [1], særlig artikel 9, stk. 4, og
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (‘basic Regulation’) [1], and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
Den 13. maj 2015 indførte Europa-Kommissionen (»Kommissionen«) en midlertidig antidumpingtold på importen til Unionen af kornorienterede fladvalsede produkter af silicium-elektrisk stål (grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel, i det følgende forkortet »GOES«) med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina (»Kina«), Japan, Republikken Korea (»Korea«), Den Russiske Føderation (»Rusland«) og Amerikas Forenede Stater (»USA«) (samlet benævnt »de pågældende lande«) ved forordning (EU) nr. 2015/763 (»forordningen om midlertidig told«) [2].
On 13 May 2015, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel (‘GOES’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’), Japan, the Republic of Korea (‘Korea’), the Russian Federation (‘Russia’) and the United States of America (‘USA’) (together, referred to as ‘the countries concerned’) by Regulation (EU) No 2015/763 (‘the provisional Regulation’) [2].
Proceduren blev indledt den 14. august 2014 på grundlag af en klage indgivet den 30. juni 2014 af European Steel Association (»EUROFER« eller »klageren«) på vegne af producenter, der tegner sig for mere end 25 % af den samlede produktion af GOES i Unionen.
The proceeding was initiated on 14 August 2014 following a complaint lodged on 30 June 2014 by the European Steel Association (‘Eurofer’ or ‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union producers of GOES.
Som anført i betragtning 15 i forordningen om midlertidig told omfattede undersøgelsen af dumping og skade perioden fra den 1. juli 2013 til den 30. juni 2014 (»undersøgelsesperioden« eller »UP«).
As set out in recital (15) of the provisional Regulation the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 (‘the investigation period or IP’).
Der blev afholdt høringer mellem høringskonsulenten og de japanske eksporterende producenter JFE Steel Corporation og Nippon Steel & Sumitoma Metal Corporation.
Hearings with the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings were held with the Japanese exporting producers JFE Steel Corporation and Nippon Steel & Sumitoma Metal Corporation.
Som det fremgår af betragtning 27, 224 og 239 i forordningen om midlertidig told, fortsatte Kommissionen med at søge og verificere alle de oplysninger, den anså for nødvendige med henblik på de endelige konklusioner.
As set out in recitals (27), (224) and (239) of the provisional Regulation, the Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Der blev aflagt fem nye kontrolbesøg efter indførelsen af de midlertidige foranstaltninger hos følgende brugere i Den Europæiske Union:
Five additional verification visits were carried out after the imposition of the provisional measures at the premises of the following users in the European Union:
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, München, Tyskland
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, München, Germany
ABB AB, Bruxelles, Belgien
ABB AB, Brussels, Belgium
Schneider Electric S.A., Metz, Frankrig.
Schneider Electric S.A., Metz, France
Der blev desuden aflagt kontrolbesøg hos følgende EU-producenter:
In addition, three verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following Union producers:
Tata Steel UK Limited (Orb Electrical Steels), Newport, Det Forenede Kongerige.
Tata Steel UK Limited (Orb Electrical Steels), Newport, United Kingdom
Alle parter blev underrettet om de vigtigste kendsgerninger og betragtninger, på grundlag af hvilke Kommissionen påtænkte at indføre endelige antidumpingforanstaltninger.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission intended to impose definitive anti-dumping measures.
Der blev afholdt en høring mellem høringskonsulenten i handelsprocedurer og en brugersammenslutning.
A hearing with the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings was held with a user association.
Kommissionen tog stilling til de mundtlige og skriftlige bemærkninger fra de interesserede parter, og konklusionerne blev, hvor det var relevant, ændret i overensstemmelse hermed.
The Commission considered the oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties and, where appropriate, modified the findings accordingly.
Som det fremgår af betragtning 16 i forordningen om midlertidig told er den pågældende vare kornorienterede fladvalsede produkter af silicium-elektrisk stål af tykkelse over 0,16 mm med oprindelse i Kina, Japan, Korea, Rusland og USA, som i øjeblikket henhører under KN-kode ex72251100 og ex72261100 (»den pågældende vare«).
As set out in recital (16) of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned is grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel, of a thickness of more than 0,16 mm originating in the PRC, Japan, Korea, Russia and the USA, currently falling within CN codes ex72251100 and ex72261100 (‘the product concerned’).
Flere interesserede parter hævdede, at den pågældende vare, jf. betragtning 16 i forordningen om midlertidig told, og samme vare ikke er en og samme vare som påstået i betragtning 22 i forordningen om midlertidig told, fordi de hverken har samme fysiske og kemiske egenskaber eller samme anvendelsesformål.
Some interested parties argued that the product concerned, as set out in recital (16) of the provisional Regulation, and the like product are not alike as stated in recital (22) of the provisional Regulation since they do not share the same physical and chemical characteristics and are not used for the same purposes.
Tre eksporterende producenter, en brugersammenslutning og to individuelle brugere påstod, at typer med høj permeabilitet og/eller områderaffinerede typer af den pågældende vare burde udelukkes fra undersøgelsens anvendelsesområde, da disse typer enten ikke produceres i tilstrækkelige mængder eller overhovedet ikke produceres i Unionen.
Three exporting producers, a user association and two individual users claimed that high permeability and/or domain refined types of the product concerned should be excluded from the scope of the investigation since these types are either not produced in sufficient quantities or not produced at all in the Union.
En af disse eksporterende producenter præciserede, at der var tale om typer af den pågældende vare med et maksimalt kernetab på 0,90 W/kg og derunder med en magnetisk polarisation på over 1,88 T. En anden eksporterende producent anmodede om en udelukkelse af typer med et maksimalt kernetab på 0,95 W/kg og derunder som følge af en begrænset konkurrencemæssig overlapning med de typer, som EU-erhvervsgrenen fremstiller.
One of these exporting producers specified that this should be types of the product concerned with a maximum core loss of 0,90 W/kg and below with a magnetic polarisation of more than 1,88 T. Another exporting producer requested the exclusion of types with a maximum core loss of 0,95 W/kg and below due to the limited competitive overlap with products offered by the Union industry.
Da Kommissionen fastsatte separate minimumsimportpriser for tre forskellige kategorier af GOES, påstod en bruger, at dette viste, at det var relevant at betragte de forskellige kategorier separat, hvilket derfor ville berettige en udelukkelse.
Some of them also argued that the product types with the lowest core losses have significantly different properties, end-uses, and therefore are not bought by the same customers and do not compete with other types of the product concerned.
Kommissionen fandt, at den pågældende vare, uanset kernetab og støjniveau, uanset om der er tale om konventionelle produkter eller produkter med høj permeabilitet, er fladvalsede produkter af legeret stål med en kornorienteret struktur, hvorved produktet kan lede et magnetfelt.
Furthermore, another user argued that two separate injury, causal link and Union interest analyses should be carried out.
Den kornorienterede struktur begrænser stålets tekniske og fysiske egenskaber til et unikt produkt med en ekstraordinært stor kornstruktur.
Finally, another user asked for the withdrawal of the provisional measures, and, if this would not be possible, that at least the high permeability types (i.e. types with a maximum core loss of 0,90 W/kg and lower) should be excluded from the product scope.
Varedækningen omfatter således et veldefineret produkt.
Following final disclosure, several interested parties reiterated the same request.
Det blev også konstateret, at alle typer af den pågældende vare har samme kemiske egenskaber og ét overordnet anvendelsesformål, nemlig produktion af transformatorer.
One user argued that the fact that the Commission established separate minimum import prices for three different categories of GOES showed the relevance of considering the different categories separately and would therefore justify an exclusion.
Desuden er de forskellige typer af den pågældende vare til en vis grad indbyrdes udskiftelige.
The Commission considered that the product concerned, irrespective of core loss or noise levels, whether conventional or high-permeability products, are flat-rolled alloy steel products having a grain-oriented structure that permits the product to conduct a magnetic field.
Hvad angår påstanden om, at en udelukkelse skulle være berettiget som følge af EU-producenternes utilstrækkelige produktion af visse særlige typer af den pågældende vare, skal det først bemærkes, at det ikke kræves i grundforordningen, at EU-erhvervsgrenen producerer alle typer af den pågældende vare i erhvervsmæssigt omfang.
The grain orientation narrows the technical and physical characteristics of the steel to a unique product having an extraordinarily large grain structure.
Desuden producerede EU-erhvervsgrenen flere varetyper med høj permeabilitet i UP.
Accordingly, the product definition comprises a well-defined product.
Som det fremgår af betragtning 131, viste gennemgangen også, at EU-producenterne har investeret i produktion af typer af den pågældende vare med høj permeabilitet, hvilket vil give dem mulighed for at øge produktionen af GOES med høj permeabilitet.
It was also found that all types of the product concerned share common chemistry and have one principal use, i.e. in the production of transformers.
Varedækningen for den undersøgte vare bestemmes desuden, jf. betragtning 12, af de tekniske egenskaber ved GOES.
In addition, there is some degree of interchangeability among the different types of the product concerned.
Den ønskede udelukkelse kunne reducere beskyttelsesniveauet over for yderligere skadevoldende dumping, hvad angår typer med særlig høj permeabilitet, og dermed opretholde EU-erhvervsgrenens nuværende produktionstal.
Concerning the argument that exclusion would be justified due to the insufficient production of some particular types of the product concerned by Union producers, it should firstly be recalled that nothing in the basic Regulation requires that all types of the product concerned are produced by the Union industry at commercial scale.
Den kendsgerning, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke producerer visse varetyper af GOES med høj permeabilitet, er under disse omstændigheder ikke en tilstrækkelig årsag til at udelukke dem fra varedækningen.
In addition, several high permeability product types were produced by the Union industry in the IP.
Vedrørende påstanden om, at brugen af de tre forskelige kategorier af GOES (se betragtning 11) viste, at en udelukkelse var berettiget, mindes der om, at undersøgelsen omfatter den pågældende vare som defineret i betragtning 9, og der blev derfor gennemført en fyldestgørende analyse af skade, årsagssammenhæng og Unionens interesser.
As mentioned in recital (131) below, the verification also showed that Union producers have been investing in the production of high permeability types of the product concerned which will allow them to increase the production of high permeability GOES.
Selv om Kommissionen godtog visse kvalitetsforskelle mellem de forskellige varetyper, og selv om der blevet taget hensyn til disse kvalitetsforskelle i forbindelse med beslutningen om foranstaltningernes form som led i analysen af Unionens interesse, jf. betragtning 172, kan dette ikke betragtes som en årsag til at ændre anvendelsesområdet for foranstaltningerne.
Furthermore, as stated in recital (12), the definition of the scope of the product under investigation is governed by the technical characteristics of the GOES.
Ud fra ovenstående afviste Kommissionen derfor anmodningerne om at udelukke disse varetyper fra varedækningen.
The requested exclusion could reduce the level of protection against further injurious dumping with regard to the particular high permeability types and thus perpetrate their current production rates by the Union industry.
Kommissionen analyserede dog som en formssag kvalitetsforskellene (jf. betragtning 172).
In these circumstances, the fact that certain product types of high permeability GOES are not produced by the Union industry is not a sufficient reason to exclude them from the product scope.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse genfremsatte den russiske eksporterende producent sin påstand og påstod, at disse eksporterede typer af »andensortering« og »tredjesortering« kun kan bruges i transformerindustrien i begrænsede anvendelser, hvis de forarbejdes i stålservicecentre, og at de derfor bør udelukkes.
Concerning the allegation that the separation into three different categories of GOES (see recital (11)) showed that an exclusion is justified, it is recalled that the investigation covers the product concerned as defined in recital (9) and therefore, one comprehensive injury analysis, causation analysis and Union interest analysis was carried out.
Den nuværende beskrivelse og den pågældende vares KN-kode omfatter potentielt mange forskellige typer, hvad angår kvalitet.
The fact that the Commission acknowledged differences in quality between the different product types and that these differences in quality were taken into account in the decision about the form of the measures in the framework of the Union interest test, as explained below in recital (172), cannot be a reason to change the scope of the measures.
Behovet for yderligere forarbejdning er ikke usædvanligt og kan ikke være en årsag til at udelukke en varetype.
One Russian exporting producer argued that on the one hand their ‘first choice’ exported types of the product concerned (with higher flatness and fewer welding seams) and on the other hand their ‘second’ and ‘third choice’ exported types (with multiple defects, number of stitches and lack of flatness) are, as per the Russian industry practice, not interchangeable to any extent (both ways) and constitute different products.
Kommissionen afviste derfor denne anmodning.
Therefore, they argued that ‘second’ and ‘third choice’ material be excluded from the product scope.
Ud fra ovenstående konkluderede Kommissionen, at den pågældende vare produceret og solgt i de pågældende lande og den vare, der produceres og sælges af EU-erhvervsgrenen er identiske, jf. grundforordningens artikel 1, stk. 4.
Following final disclosure, the Russian exporting producer repeated its claim and alleged that these ‘second’ and ‘third choice’ exported types can only be used in the transformer industry in some limited applications if they are further processed in steel service centres and should therefore be excluded.
Konklusionerne i betragtning 16-21 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes derfor.
The current description and the CN code of the product concerned potentially include a wide variety of types from a quality perspective.
Generel metode
However, production of a lower quality product by both the Union and exporting producers is inherent to the production process and lower quality types are made from the same basic material and on the same production equipment.
Da der ikke blev fremsat nye bemærkninger vedrørende Kommissionens generelle metode i forbindelse med dumpingberegningerne, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 33-45 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The so-called ‘second’ and ‘third choice’ exported types are also sold for use in the transformer business, and fully meet the definition of the product concerned.
Korea
The fact that further processing is needed is not unusual and cannot be a reason to exclude a product type.
Normal værdi
Therefore, the Commission rejected this request.
Desuden skulle omkostningerne ved omregning fra hele ruller til rullestansede bredbånd justeres let.
Recitals (16) to (21) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
I henhold til den generelle metode, som blev fastsat i betragtning 56 i forordningen om midlertidig told, blev denne påstand accepteret, og beregningerne blev ændret tilsvarende.
C. DUMPING
Konklusionerne i betragtning 46 i forordningen om midlertidig ændres derfor, for så vidt angår den eksporterende producent.
General methodology
Eksportpris
In the absence of any further comments on the Commission's general methodology used for the dumping calculations, recitals (33) to (45) of the Provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Den eksporterende producent påstod, at den udgjorde en enkelt økonomisk enhed sammen med sine handelsvirksomheder og forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomheder i Unionen, og at man derfor ikke burde have foretaget en justering i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 9, for at fastsætte eksportprisen.
Republic of Korea
Det er uomtvisteligt, at de eksporterende producenter og de forretningsmæssigt forbundne importører hører til den samme virksomhedsgruppe.
Normal value
Det konkluderes derfor, at der består en forbindelse mellem dem.
Following provisional disclosure, the sole exporting producer pointed out that the company's inland freight and handling charges should have been deducted from the normal value.
I sådanne tilfælde må Kommissionen beregne eksportprisen i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 9.
Moreover, the conversion cost from full coils to slit coils had to be slightly adjusted.
Påstanden blev derfor afvist, og betragtning 50-54 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes.
In line with the general methodology as set out in recital (56) of the provisional Regulation, this claim was accepted and the calculations were amended accordingly.
Sammenligning
Consequently, the findings in recital (46) of the Provisional Regulation are amended with regard to the exporting producer.
Den eksporterende producent anmodede også om en justering for handelsled i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, og påstod, at hjemmemarkedssalget blev foretaget af forretningsmæssigt forbundne forhandlere til slutbrugerne, hvorimod eksportsalget i praksis blev beregnet som en pris til distributørerne, idet Kommissionen fratrak de forretningsmæssigt forbundne forhandleres SG&A og fortjenstmargen i Unionen, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 9.
Export price
Selv om eksportprisen blev beregnet i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 9, betyder dette ikke en ændring af det handelsled, hvori eksportprisen blev fastlagt.
The exporting producer claimed that it formed a single economic entity with its trading companies and its related companies in the Union and that therefore no adjustment under Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation to determine the export price should have been done.
Grundlaget for den beregnede eksportpris er stadig den pris, som slutbrugerne skal betale.
It is undisputed that the exporting producer and the related importers belong to the same group of companies.
En justering for handelsled er ikke berettiget i denne sag, da den eksporterende producent solgte i samme handelsled på både hjemmemarkedet og EU-markedet.
Therefore, an association is deemed to exist between them.
Under alle omstændigheder fremlagde den eksporterende producent ingen beviser for, at den påståede forskel i handelsled skulle havde påvirket prissammenligneligheden som påvist ved vedvarende og omfattende forskelle i sælgerens funktioner og priser for forskellige handelsled på hjemmemarkedet i eksportlandet.
In such circumstances, the Commission has to construct the export price under Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.