natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I fransk ret er administrativt tilsyn en form for magt, der udøves af en offentligretlig juridisk person over en anden.
For all these reasons, the measures in favour of Ryanair and AMS should be assessed jointly in order to determine whether there was an economic advantage, as Ryanair and AMS in fact form a single beneficiary of the measures in question [84].
Tilsynet med de regionale handels- og industrikamre og de territoriale handels- og industrikamre varetages af regionens præfekt bistået af finansministeriets regionale ansvarlige.
The Commission also notes that the only advantage potentially gained by airport operators from the marketing services offered by AMS on the Ryanair website would be an increase in the number of passengers using Ryanair.
I overensstemmelse med forfatningen og loven vedrører administrativt tilsyn kun lovligheden af de beslutninger, som træffes af den juridiske person, der er underlagt dette tilsyn.
Traffic and load factor estimates therefore constitute an essential component of the analysis of the profitability of entering into a relationship with Ryanair [85].
Artikel R.712-2 til R.712-11-1 i Code de commerce (handelsloven).
The Commission therefore considers that, for the purposes of applying the market economy operator test, the assessment of the advisability of entering into a commercial relationship with Ryanair [86] cannot ignore the consequences of the parallel conclusion of marketing agreements, and particularly their costs.
Cf. http://www.ccimp.com/ccimp/nous_connaitre/une_structure_publique.
Market economy operator test
Dekret af 22.7.1987 om koncession til indretning, vedligeholdelse og drift af lufthavnen Marseille-Marginane givet til Chambre de commerce et d'industrie de Marseille, Journal officiel de la République française af 29.7.1987, s. 8487.
On 19 May 2006 the CCIMP concluded, for a term of five years renewable once for the same period, without prior publicity or competitive tendering, an agreement to purchase advertising space with the company AMS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the airline Ryanair.
Fortrolig oplysning.
It was indicated in the Cocoéco decision of 18 February 2009 on the charges that were set in the decision of 25 May 2009 that the cost of the AMS agreement over the agreed term, i.e. October 2006-October 2011, was EUR […]*, i.e. EUR […]* per year.
Kommissionen forstår det således, at Conseil d'États afgørelse indebærer, at afgiftssatserne er ophævet med tilbagevirkende kraft, dvs. fra deres ikrafttrædelsesdato.
France's main argument is that the payments made under this agreement were in line with the market price for online marketing services, from which it concludes that the CCIMP acted as a market economy operator by signing the agreement with AMS.
Efter ophævelsen anses disse satser således for aldrig at have eksisteret.
However, as stated in Section 7.2.2.5, the Commission considers that any advantages received by AMS and Ryanair must be assessed jointly, given the indissociable nature of the services provided by the airline and its subsidiary.
Kommissionen forstår det således, at det i mangel af nye godkendte satser bestemmes i artikel 224-4-1-II i Code de l'aviation civile, at de tidligere fastlagte satser (som var gældende før den 1.6.2006) i stedet finder anvendelse.
The Commission therefore considers that the potential value of the marketing services provided by AMS lies in an increase in Ryanair traffic.
Lufthavnsafgifternes gennemsnitlige dækning [50-80]* % i 2007-2012 i begge tilfælde og en samlet gennemsnitlig dækning på [100-150]* % (mp1) og [100-150]* % (terminal mp2) (inklusive indtægter fra andet end luftfart, f.eks. parkeringspladser, butikker og udlejningsfirmaer).
France's response seems to suggest that it agrees with this analysis.
CE, 27.7.2011, Air France m.fl., nr. 329818, 340540.
In fact, France maintains that a prudent operator would have jointly analysed the charging framework applicable to Ryanair and the cost of the marketing services purchased from AMS in order to determine the profitability of a flight operated by Ryanair, which is the reasoning that the CCIMP would have followed in its decision to sign the agreement of 19 May 2006.
Ifølge artikel L.224-2 i Code de l'aviation civile må det samlede provenu af disse afgifter ikke overstige omkostningerne ved de tjenesteydelser, der leveres i lufthavnen.
As the marketing services provided by AMS were indissociable from the relationship between Marseille Provence Airport and the airline Ryanair, the advantages granted to these two entities should therefore be studied jointly.
Indtil 31.12.2007 var der forskellige afgiftssatser i terminal mp1 på nationale flyvninger, flyvninger inden for EU og internationale flyvninger.
As a result, the CCIMP's conduct at the time when the agreement of 19 May 2006 was signed with AMS cannot be assessed in relation to the offers of other online advertisers, which do not provide a comparable service.
Der blev ikke skelnet mellem destinationerne i terminal mp2.
In the alternative, France maintains that the agreement concluded by the CCIMP with AMS represented a profitable purchase for Marseille Provence Airport, particularly with regard to the activity of Terminal mp2.
Fra 1. januar 2008 (og for de tilbagevirkende afgifter for 2006 og 2007) blev der skelnet mellem EU Schengen, EU uden for Schengen og internationale ruter i terminal mp1 og mellem nationale ruter + EU og internationale ruter i terminal mp2.
It should be recalled that the profitability study on investment in the construction of Terminal mp2 (September 2005 business plan updated in May 2006) did not take into account the costs of the agreement concluded with AMS, but rather the costs of the previous scheme for participating in marketing costs.
Air Frances repræsentant i Cocoéco stemte ikke imod indførelsen af startstøtten, jf. klage fra Air France af 27.3.2007, s. 14.
In the end, this scheme was not applied, as explained in Section 7.2.2.3.
Air France fremsendte et eksemplar af betingelserne til Kommissionen.
France has produced a profitability study on the financial margins generated by Ryanair flights over the 2007-2021 period, conducted in September 2005 and updated in May 2006 before the agreement was concluded with AMS, which the CCIMP apparently used to make the decision on the agreement of 19 May 2006.
CE, 27.7.2011, Air France m.fl., nr. 329818, 340540.
This study is based on the following information (for 2007):
Meddelelse fra Kommissionen — EF-retningslinjer for finansiering af lufthavne og statslig startstøtte til luftfartsselskaber, som opererer fra regionale lufthavne (EUT C 312 af 9.12.2005, s. 1).
the financial margin per flight, ignoring the cost of the AMS agreement, for a B737 aircraft at Terminal mp2 is EUR […]*;
Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 659/1999 af 22. marts 1999 om fastlæggelse af regler for anvendelsen af EF-traktatens artikel 93, EFT L 83 af 27.3.1999.
the fact that Ryanair traffic accounts for 85 % of the low-cost traffic assumptions;
Meddelelse fra Kommissionen, »Handlingsplan for kapacitet, effektivitet og sikkerhed i Europas lufthavne«, KOM(2006) 819 endelig, ikke offentliggjort i EUT.
the fact that Ryanair traffic accounts for 2694 flights (corresponding to an aircraft with 189 seats and a load factor of 75 %).
Kommissionen påpeger en uoverensstemmelse i Frankrigs svar, hvori Frankrig først hævder, at støttebeløbet, der skal underkastets en forenelighedsanalyse, er på 932649 EUR (s. 26) og dernæst 980 EUR.
This study reveals that the presence of Ryanair at Marseille Provence Airport, under the charging conditions that it was offered, in particular the reductions for new routes and also for overnight parking, and given the purchase of marketing services from its subsidiary, leads to the airport making a loss in the first three years, with a profit being generated for the airport only from the fourth year of operation [87].
Frankrig præciserer, at en konsekvensanalyse, som CCIMP foretog, viste, at lufthavnens fragtforretning rummede 582 stillinger i 2000 og 614 i 2009.
It is apparent from the business plan that, over 15 years (2007-2021), the average profit margin for all flights is high enough to meet the profitability expectations of a market economy operator.
Frankrig præciserer, at fragttrafikken steg med 20,86 % fra 2005 til 2010 og nåede op på 52179 tons i 2010.
The agreement of 19 May 2006 was concluded with a view to the medium-term development of the airport's traffic.
I den indgåede aftale mellem CCIMP og MPM bestemmes det, at den offentlige forvaltningsmyndigheds deltagelse er fastsat efter de investeringsprogrammer, som lufthavnen i Marseille har fremlagt, og som MPM har valgt, at midlerne alene har til formål at dække de udgifter, der således er godkendt, at den offentlige årlige deltagelse er begrænset til de udgifter, som lufthavnen faktisk har afholdt i regnskabsåret, at hver anmodning om udbetaling af midler ledsages af en udgiftsoversigt, og at CCIMP stiller samtlige fakturaer vedrørende operationerne til rådighed for MPM.
The AMS agreement replaced the marketing measures originally included in the business plan for the Terminal mp2 construction project.
I sine beslutninger henviser Frankrigs rådgivende kommission for luftfart (Commission consultative aéroportuaire — Cocoaéro) i forbindelse med Aéroports de Paris (ADP) til en WACC på 5,8-6,5 % i perioden 2006-2010 og 6,2-6,8 % i perioden 2011-2015 og i forbindelse med lufthavnen i Toulouse til en WACC på 6-6,5 % i perioden 2009-2013.
The average cost of the agreement with AMS per Ryanair passenger therefore allowed the Terminal mp2 construction project to be profitable as a whole.
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2009/12/EF af 11. marts 2009 om lufthavnsafgifter (EUT L 70 af 14.3.2009, s. 11).
Table 14
Beslutning af 14.6.1999 i statsstøttesag NN 109/98, Det Forenede Kongerige — Manchester Airport.
Simulation of the profitability of the AMS agreement in relation to Ryanair traffic (including the effects of the modulated charges)
Kommissionens beslutning 2004/393/EF af 12. februar 2004 om de fordele, som regionen Vallonien og Brussels South Charleroi Airport har indrømmet luftfartsselskabet Ryanair ved selskabets etablering i Charleroi (EUT L 137 af 30.4.2004).
Total traffic assumption
Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1998/2006 af 15. december 2006 om anvendelse af traktatens artikel 87 og 88 på de minimis-støtte (EUT L 379 af 28.12.2006, s. 5).
Ryanair outbound passengers ([…]* %)
Kommissionens beslutning 98/337/EF af 21. januar 1998 om den flamske regions støtte til luftfartsselskabet Air Belgium og til rejsebureauet Sunair med henblik på benyttelse af lufthavnen i Oostende (EFT L 148 af 19.5.1998, s. 36).
Number of Ryanair outbound flights
Kommissionens afgørelse 2011/60/EU af 27. januar 2010 om statsstøtte C-12/08 (ex NN 74/07) — Slovakisk — Aftale mellem Bratislava lufthavn og Ryanair (meddelt under nummer K(2010) 183) (EUT L 27 af 1.2.2011, s. 24).
AMS advertising purchases (EUR)
Lufthavnsudvalget, 15.11.2005.
Price of agreement per pax
Kommissionens afgørelse af 28.1.2009, støtte E4/2007, K(2009) 184 endelig.
Margin on traffic after AMS
Domstolens dom af 16. april 2002, Frankrig mod Kommissionen, C-482/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294.
Average price per pax of AMS agreement calculated over 5 years
Til støtte for dette argument citerer Ryanair Conseil d'États udtalelse af 16.6.1992 nr. 351654.
Average price per pax of AMS agreement calculated over 10 years
Ryanair henviser til dette emne i indledningsafgørelsens afsnit om CCIMP's manglende inddrivelse af den refusion, der hidrører fra anvendelsen af satser med tilbagevirkende kraft, Frankrigs gentagne krav om, at der skulle sættes en stopper for nedsatte afgifter for nationale flyvninger, og CCIMP's indførelse af en markedsføringsstøtte uden forudgående tilladelse fra Frankrig.
Income (EUR)
Ryanair henviser til Rettens dom af 17. december 2008, Ryanair mod Kommissionen, T-196/04, ECLI:EU:T:2008:585.
Costs (EUR)
Ryanair minder om, at terminal mp2 ikke har dyr marmorbelægning, forsænkede lofter, skærme over indcheckningsskrankerne, transportanordninger til bagage over til hovedterminalen, bagagevogne, ventesale, informationsskranker, rulletrapper, rullende fortove eller jetways.
Margin (EUR)
Ryanair citerer til støtte for dette udsagn den afgørelse, som CAA UK traf den 27.5.2011 om den klage, som Ryanair havde indgivet over en afgift, der blev opkrævet på diskriminerende vis i lufthavnen i Gatwick.
Net margin (EUR)
Se fodnote 18.
NPV at […]* % (EUR)
Domstolens dom af 15. maj 2002, Frankrig mod Kommissionen, C-482/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294, præmis 52 og 58.
As a result, the charges applied to the airlines, taking into account the various reductions and the costs of the agreement with AMS, always cover at least the additional costs associated with each airline's use of the airport.
Afgørelse 2011/60/EU, betragtning 114.
Before any subsequent changes to the charges and before the signature of the marketing agreement with AMS, the airport produced plausible estimates showing that the measures would positively contribute to the airport's profitability.
TA de Marseille, kendelse afsagt af dommeren (i sager om foreløbige forholdsregler) den 17.3.2011, nr. 1101332, ifølge hvilken domstolen finder, at situationen ikke er kendetegnende for en så tilstrækkeligt alvorlig og umiddelbar skade på en samfundsinteresse, at de kan betragtes som en hastesag; afviser anmodning om suspendering; realitetsbehandlingen af klagen er ikke afgjort og verserer fortsat.
The assumptions made and other scenarios envisaged in the original business plan and its updates, just like the financial calculations associated with subsequent measures, seemed realistic at the time that they were produced.
Se Kommissionens meddelelse om anvendelsen af Den Europæiske Unions statsstøtteregler på kompensation for levering af tjenesteydelser af almindelig økonomisk interesse (EUT C 8 af 11.1.2012, s. 4, præmis 2.1), og dertil knyttet retspraksis, navnlig Domstolens dom af 12. september 2000, Pavlov m.fl., forenede sager C-180/98 til C-184/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:428.
Subsequent developments have in fact shown that they were rather conservative.
Domstolens dom af 16. juni 1987, Kommissionen mod Italien, 118/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:283, præmis 7;, Domstolens dom af 18. juni 1998, Kommissionen mod Italien, C-35/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303, præmis 36; Pavlov m.fl., ECLI:EU:C:2000:428, præmis 75.
Moreover, they have been regularly updated and revised and the charges have been regularly adapted to guarantee the airport's profitability in the long term and changes to the charges in the short term.
Domstolens dom af 29. oktober 1980, Van Landewyck mod Kommissionen, forenede sager 209/78-215/78 og 218/78, ECLI:EU:C:1980:248, præmis 88; Domstolens dom af 16. november 1995, Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurance m.fl. C-244/94, ECLI:EU:C:1995:392, præmis 21 og Domstolens dom af 1. juli 2008, MOTOE, C-49/07, ECLI:EU:C:2008:376, præmis 27 og 28.
Conclusion on the existence of aid
Domstolens dom af 19. januar 1994, SAT Fluggesellschaft mod Eurocontrol, C-364/92, ECLI:EU:C:1994:7.
It is clear from Section 6.3 that Marseille Provence Airport has benefited from investment aid that is compatible with the internal market.
Kommissionens beslutning N309/2002 af 19.3.2003 om sikkerhed i luften — kompensation for omkostninger som følge af attentaterne den 11.9.2001.
The Commission considers that, where an airport operator has benefited from compatible aid, the advantage resulting from such aid cannot be passed on to a specific airline, particularly if the following conditions are met:
Kommissionens beslutning N 438/02 af 16.10.2002, subsidier til havnemyndighederne for udøvelse af beføjelser som offentlig myndighed.
the infrastructure is open to all airlines (including infrastructure that is more likely to be used by certain categories, such as low-cost airlines or charter airlines) and is not reserved for a particular airline, and
Rettens dom af 12. maj 2011, Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais, forenede sager T-267/08 og T-279/08, ECLI:EU:T:2011:209, præmis 108.
the airlines pay charges covering at least the incremental costs.
Hvad angår kategoriseringen af midlerne fra EFRU som statsstøtte, henvises til Kommissionens afgørelse i statsstøttesag N 514/2006, South Yorkshire digital region broadband project, betragtning 29, og Kommissionens afgørelse i statsstøttesag N 44/2010, Development of infrastructure on Krievu Sala for relocation of port activities out of the city center, betragtning 69-70.
In the present case, the Commission firstly notes that Terminal mp2 and its adjacent aircraft parking area are not reserved for a particular airline.
Domstolens dom af 14. februar 1990, Frankrig mod Kommissionen, C-301/87, ECLI: EU:C:1990:67, præmis 41.
Terminal mp2 is open to all airlines wishing to use it, on the understanding that it offers a limited level of service.
Rettens dom af 24. marts 2011, Freistaat Sachsen m.fl. mod Kommissionen, forenede sager T-443/08 og T-445/08, ECLI:EU:T:2011:117, præmis 107.
To ensure that the terminal was open to all interested operators, the airport launched a call for expressions of interest in using the infrastructure.
Domstolens dom af 16. maj 2002, Frankrig mod Kommissionen, C-482/99, ECLI: EU:C:2002:294, præmis 69.
However, as it is not being operated to full capacity, the terminal is available to any interested airline.
Frankrig hævder subsidiært, at tilskuddet fra Conseil général til finansieringen af terminal mp2 udgør støtte, der er forenelig med traktatens bestemmelser.
Secondly, according to the assessment set out above (see Sections 7.2.2.1-7.2.2.5), the airlines also pay charges covering at least the incremental costs generated by each agreement.
Dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans af 12.12.2000, Alitalia mod Kommissionen, T-296/97, ECLI: EU:T:2000:289, præmis 84; dom i sag C-305/89 (nævnt ovenfor), præmis 20.
The Commission notes that the agreements under investigation form part of the airport's overall strategy leading to profitability, at least in the long term.
Se i den forbindelse 2005-retningslinjerne, punkt 46.
To assess the effect of agreements between the airport and an airline on the airport's profitability, the Commission takes account of the factual evidence available, as also the developments that could reasonably have been expected at the time when the agreements were concluded.
Dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans af 21.1.1999, Neue Maxhütte Stahlwerke og Lech Stahlwerke mod Kommissionen, forenede sager T-129/95, T-2/96 og T-97/96, ECLI: EU:T:1999:7, præmis 120.
It takes into account in particular:
Se også Domstolens dom af 10. juli 1986, Belgien mod Kommissionen, C-40/85, ECLI:EU:C:1986:305, præmis 13.
the market conditions prevailing at the time, in particular changes occurring following liberalisation of the air transport market, the arrival on the market and development of low-cost airlines [88] and other ‘point-to-point’ carriers, changes to the organisational and economic structure of the airport sector [89]. the degree of diversification and the complexity of the functions performed by airports, the reinforcement of competition between airlines and between airports, the uncertain economic context due to changes in market conditions, or any other uncertainty existing in the economic context;
De tjenesteydelser, som handels- og industrikammerets hovedafdeling leverede til lufthavnsafdelingen, bestod ifølge Frankrig i administrative og organisatoriske opgaver, personaleledelse og juridisk ekspertise.
the expected long-term effects on the airport's profitability.
Kommissionen henviser til betragtning 218-222 i sin indledningsafgørelse med hensyn til anvendelsen af 2005-retningslinjerne ratione temporis.
The Commission points out that, according to the information provided by France, the airport expected, in the original business plan that led to the decision to construct Terminal mp2, to achieve a positive NPV in the long term.
Kommissionens afgørelse af 18.2.2011 i statsstøttesag NN 26/2009 — Grækenland — Udvidelse af lufthavnen i Ioannina, præmis 69 og 70.
According to France, the financial results of Terminal mp2 have confirmed these optimistic expectations.
Handlingsplan, punkt 7 og boksen s. 3.
Likewise, the reductions granted on the charges, which were applicable to the entire airport including Terminal mp1, were based on sound financial calculations according to which the airport could expect to achieve profitability by adopting these measures.
Scenariet uden opførelse af den nye terminal har et samlet kumuleret cashflow i perioden på […]* EUR, mens scenariet med opførelse af terminal mp2 har et samlet kumuleret cashflow i perioden på […]* EUR.
The Commission takes the view that the forecasts of the profitability and use of Terminal mp2 were reasonable and sound.
Forskellen mellem de to scenarier giver en TRI på […]* %.
Most of the time they have proved to be conservative.
Den begrænsede trafik i 2006 skyldes en sen åbning (oktober 2006) af terminal mp2.
Consequently, the Commission considers that the charges applied, the reductions granted and the marketing agreement concluded with AMS form part of the airport's overall strategy leading to profitability, at least in the long term.
Samlet kapacitet: 3,8 mio. passagerer.
It is therefore of the opinion that the agreements concluded between Marseille Provence Airport and the user airlines do not constitute State aid.
Samlet kapacitet: 8,6 mio. passagerer.
Furthermore, it considers that, under these circumstances, even if State aid had been granted to the airlines, this would in any event have been compatible with the internal market for the same reasons proving the compatibility of the aid granted to the airport.
Kommissionen anvender det samme forenelighedskriterium for fragttransporten, se Kommissionens afgørelse i sag SA.30743 (C/2011) (ex N 138/2010) — Tyskland — Finansiering af infrastrukturforanstaltninger i Leipzig-Halle lufthavn (EUT C 284 af 28.9.2011, s. 6), præmis 128.
As one of the cumulative criteria pursuant to Article 107(1) TFEU is not fulfilled, the Commission considers that the measures under investigation are free of State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1260/1999 af 21.6.1999 om vedtagelse af generelle bestemmelser for strukturfondene (EFT L 161 af 26.6.1999, s. 1), artikel 1.
CONCLUSION
I partnerskabsaftalen mellem lufthavnen Marseille Provence og MPM af 14. maj 2004 tages der højde for en stigning i den nationale trafik på 5 % om året og den internationale trafik på henved 10 % om året mellem 2003 og 2006.
MEASURES IN FAVOUR OF THE AIRPORT
Vægtet gennemsnit.
The Commission finds that France unlawfully granted investment aid to Marseille Provence Airport in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
Se fodnote 31.
However, it must be stated that this aid is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Kommissionens direktiv 2000/52/EF af 26.7.2000 om ændring af direktiv 80/723/EØF om gennemskueligheden af de økonomiske forbindelser mellem medlemsstaterne og de offentlige virksomheder (EFT L 193 af 29.7.2000, s. 75).
The airport tax and the transfers between the airport and the CCIMP do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2004/18/EF af 31.3.2004 om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved indgåelse af offentlige vareindkøbskontrakter, offentlige tjenesteydelseskontrakter og offentlige bygge- og anlægskontrakter (EUT L 134 af 30.4.2004, s. 114).
MEASURES IN FAVOUR OF AIRLINES USING THE AIRPORT
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2004/17/EF af 31.3.2004 om samordning af fremgangsmåderne ved indgåelse af kontrakter inden for vand- og energiforsyning, transport samt posttjenester (EUT L 134 af 30.4.2004, s. 1).
The Commission finds that the airport acted as a market economy operator in its financial relations with the airlines using the airport.
Dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans af 12. december 1996, Air France mod Kommissionen, T-358/94, ECLI:EU:T:1996:194, præmis 62.
The various modulated charges and the marketing agreement with AMS do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU,
Aftaler indgået med Conseil général den 3.10.2002, den 5.9.2003 og den 19.5.2005 og med MPM den 14.5.2004.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: