natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den pågældende part begrundede desuden heller ikke sin påstand om, at brugerne havde akkumuleret lagerbeholdninger i tiden inden den betragtede periode, og at de havde solgt disse lagerbeholdninger i større mængder, da importen fra Indonesien steg.
The assumption that imports from Vietnam were replaced by imports from Indonesia is therefore not confirmed by the findings.
Disse påstande kunne heller ikke bekræftes i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
Moreover, the party concerned did not substantiate its claim that users had accumulated stocks prior to the period considered and that they sold these in increased quantities when imports from Indonesia increased.
Den interesserede parts påstande i denne henseende bør derfor afvises.
These allegations could also not be confirmed during the investigation.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende EU-forbruget, bekræftes konklusionerne som anført i betragtning 52-55 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The interested party's claims in this respect should therefore be rejected.
Import fra det pågældende land
In the absence of any other comments with respect to Union consumption, the conclusions set out in recitals 52 to 55 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Da der ikke blev fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende importen fra det pågældende land, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 56-66 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Imports from the country concerned
EU-erhvervsgrenens økonomiske situation
In the absence of any comments concerning the imports from the country concerned, the conclusions set out in recitals 56 to 66 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Selv om produktionsmængden og kapacitetsudnyttelsen faldt i den betragtede periode, påstod en interesseret part, at dette blot skyldtes en væsentlig stigning før denne periode.
Economic situation of the Union industry
Parten påstod, at faldet i den betragtede periode derfor ikke kunne betragtes som en negativ udvikling og ikke var tegn på skade.
One interested party claimed that although production volume and capacity utilisation decreased during the period considered this was only a consequence of a substantial increase before that period.
Når udviklingen i skadesindikatorerne evalueres, tages der dog normalt kun højde for tendenserne i den betragtede periode.
This party claimed that, therefore, the decrease in the period considered was not to be considered as a negative development and would not show injury.
I den foreliggende sag var der ingen gyldig grund til at afvige fra denne praksis og evaluere udviklingen i skadesindikatorerne over en længere periode.
However, only trends established during the period considered are normally taken into account when assessing the development of the injury indicators.
Dette argument bør derfor afvises.
In the present case there was no valid reason to deviate from this practice and to assess the developments of the injury indicators over an extended period.
Den samme interesserede part påstod, at den mulige inkludering af biprodukter kan have forøget EU-erhvervsgrenens produktionsomkostninger, hvilket også ville have haft en indvirkning på rentabiliteten.
This argument should therefore be rejected.
Denne påstand er ikke korrekt.
The same interested party alleged that the possible inclusion of by-products may have inflated the costs of production of the Union industry which would also have had an impact on profitability.
EU-erhvervsgrenens produktionsomkostninger inklusive biprodukter blev kontrolleret, og det blev fastslået, at omkostningerne var fuldstændige og korrekte.
This allegation was incorrect.
Denne påstand bør derfor afvises.
The Union industry's cost of production, including by-products were subject to verification and the completeness and correctness of costs have been satisfactorily established.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende udviklingen i skadesindikatorerne, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 67-93 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
This claim should therefore be rejected.
Konklusion vedrørende skade
In the absence of any other comments concerning the development of the injury indicators, the conclusions set out in recitals 67 to 93 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
En interesseret part påstod, at ikke alle skadesindikatorer viste en negativ tendens, og at en negativ tendens i kun nogle få skadesindikatorer ikke er tilstrækkeligt grundlag til at konkludere, at EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt væsentlig skade.
Conclusion on injury
I henhold til grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 5, behøver ikke alle skadesindikatorerne at vise en negativ tendens for, at det kan konkluderes, at der er forvoldt skade.
One interested party claimed that not all injury indicators showed a negative trend and that the existence of a negative trend in only a few injury indicators is not sufficient to conclude that the Union industry suffered material injury.
Desuden var påstanden ukorrekt, da undersøgelsen har vist, at næsten alle skadesindikatorer viste en negativ tendens i den betragtede periode.
Under Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation not all injury indicators must have a negative trend to conclude on the existence of injury.
Påstandene bør derfor afvises.
In addition, the claim was incorrect as the investigation has shown that almost all injury indicators showed a negative trend during the period considered.
På baggrund af ovenstående, og da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 94-96 i forordningen om midlertidig told, nemlig at EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt væsentlig skade, jf. grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 5.
The claims should therefore be rejected.
E. ÅRSAGSSAMMENHÆNG
On the basis of the above and in the absence of any other comments, the conclusions set out in recitals 94 to 96 of the provisional Regulation that the Union industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation were confirmed.
Dumpingimportens virkninger
E. CAUSATION
På grundlag af konklusionerne i betragtning 66 i forordningen om midlertidig told, dvs. at den vejede gennemsnitlige underbudsmargen for den indonesiske import var på mellem 0 % og 5 % i undersøgelsesperioden, påstod en part, at denne import ikke kunne have forvoldt EU-erhvervsgrenen skade, da den ikke kunne have udøvet et prispres på EU-markedet.
Effect of the dumped imports
Denne påstand blev ikke understøttet af kendsgerninger fra undersøgelsen.
One party claimed that given the findings set out in recital 66 of the provisional Regulation, that is that the weighted average undercutting margin of Indonesian imports was between 0 % and 5 % during the investigation period, these imports could not have caused the injury suffered by the Union industry as they could not have exerted any price pressure on the Union market.
Som det fremgår af betragtning 99 og 100 i forordningen om midlertidig told, steg dumpingimporten fra Indonesien markant i den betragtede periode både i absolutte tal og i markedsandele.
This allegation was not supported by the facts of the investigation.
Denne stigning faldt sammen med et fald i EU-erhvervsgrenens salgsmængde og markedsandel.
As outlined in recitals 99 and 100 of the provisional Regulation, dumped imports from Indonesia increased substantially during the period considered, both in absolute terms and in terms of market share.
De væsentlige importmængder tvang EU-erhvervsgrenen til at sænke sine salgspriser og bringe dem på linje med prisniveauet for den indonesiske import.
This increase coincided with a decrease in sales volume and market share from the Union industry.
Som et resultat heraf var underbudsmargenerne meget lave.
The imports in such substantial quantities forced the Union industry to lower its sales prices in order to align them with the price levels of the Indonesian imports.
Samtidig var EU-erhvervsgrenen imidlertid ikke i stand til at fastsætte sine priser på niveau med omkostningsstigningerne, hvilket førte til et markant fald i rentabiliteten i den betragtede periode.
As a consequence the undercutting margins found were indeed low.
Dette bekræftes af størrelsen på skadesmargenerne, som varierer mellem 24,9 % og 47,0 %, jf. betragtning 125.
However, at the same time the Union industry was not able to set their prices in line with the cost increase which lead to a significant decrease of its profitability during the period considered.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende dumpingimportens virkninger, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 98-101 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
This is confirmed by the magnitude of the injury margins found which range between 24,9 % and 47,0 % as mentioned below in recital 125.
Andre faktorers indvirkning
In the absence of any other comments as regard the effects of the dumped imports, the conclusions set out in recitals 98 to 101 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Virkningerne af importen fra Kina
Effect of other factors
To interesserede parter påstod, at den kinesiske import i modsætning til konklusionerne i betragtning 103 i forordningen om midlertidig told havde en negativ virkning på EU-erhvervsgrenens salgspriser og dermed bidrog til den væsentlige skade.
Effect of imports from China
I absolutte tal var mængden af import fra Kina lav i hele den betragtede periode, hvilket fremgår af betragtning 102 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Two interested parties alleged that, contrary to the conclusions reached in recital 103 of the provisional Regulation, Chinese imports had a negative effect on the Union industry's sales prices and contributed therefore to the material injury.
Når man tager antidumpingtolden i betragtning var importpriserne desuden højere end EU-erhvervsgrenens salgspriser og også højere end de indonesiske importpriser.
In absolute terms, the volume of Chinese imports remained at low levels during the period considered as mentioned in recital 102 of the provisional Regulation.
I betragtning af mængden og priserne for importen fra Kina blev påstanden om, at den kinesiske import bidrog til EU-erhvervsgrenens væsentlige skade, afvist.
Furthermore, when taking into consideration the anti-dumping duties, import prices were at higher levels than the Union industry's sales prices and also higher than the Indonesian import prices.
Konklusionerne i betragtning 102-103 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes derfor.
The allegation that Chinese imports contributed to the material injury suffered by the Union industry was, in view of the import volumes and import prices levels from China, rejected.
Importen fra andre tredjelande
The conclusions reached in recitals 102 and 103 of the provisional Regulation were therefore confirmed.
Da der ikke blev fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende virkningen af importen fra andre tredjelande, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 104-108 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Imports from other third countries
Udviklingen i EU-forbruget
In the absence of any comments with regard to the effect of imports from other third countries, the conclusions reached in recitals 104 to 108 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de foreløbige konklusioner påstod en interesseret part, at faldet i EU-erhvervsgrenens salg faldt sammen med faldet i EU-forbruget, som derfor var den vigtigste årsag til den væsentlige skade, der forvoldtes EU-erhvervsgrenen.
Development of Union consumption
Som det fremgår af betragtning 109 i forordningen om midlertidig told, var faldet i forbruget kun på 2 %, mens faldet i EU-erhvervsgrenens salg var på 17 % i den betragtede periode.
Following the provisional disclosure, one interested party claimed that the decrease in sales of the Union industry coincided with the decrease in Union consumption which was therefore the main cause of the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Faldet i forbruget kan derfor ikke forklare det meget større fald i salgsmængden.
As set out in recital 109 of the provisional Regulation, the decrease in consumption was only 2 % while the decrease in sales of the Union industry was 17 % during the period considered.
Desuden steg importen fra Indonesien til trods for det faldende forbrug.
Therefore, the decrease in consumption cannot explain the much higher decrease in sales volume.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger om dette aspekt, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 109 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In addition, imports from Indonesia increased despite the decreasing consumption.
EU-erhvervsgrenens eksportresultater
In the absence of any other comment in this regard, the conclusions reached in recital 109 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Da der ikke blev fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende virkningen af EU-erhvervsgrenens eksportresultater, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 110-112.
Export performance of the Union industry
EU-erhvervsgrenens påståede ineffektivitet
In the absence of any comments regarding the effect of the Union industry's export performance, the conclusions reached in recitals 110 to 112 were confirmed.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de foreløbige konklusioner gentog to parter deres påstand om, at EU-erhvervsgrenes skade skyldtes en påstået ineffektivitet i EU-erhvervsgrenens produktionsproces, herunder EU-erhvervsgrenens ineffektive anvendelse af ressourcerne.
Alleged inefficiencies of the Union industry
Parterne kunne dog ikke specificere arten af den påståede ineffektivitet.
Following provisional disclosure, two parties reiterated that the injury suffered by the Union industry was due to the alleged inefficiencies inherent to the Union industry's production process including the inefficient use of resources by the Union industry.
Som det fremgår af betragtning 113 i forordningen om midlertidig told, viste undersøgelsen ingen eventuel ineffektivitet i EU-erhvervsgrenen, og påstandene herom blev derfor afvist.
These parties failed to specify the nature of the alleged inefficiencies.
Efter fremlæggelsen af konklusionerne gentog en interesseret part sine påstande vedrørende EU-erhvervsgrenens ineffektivitet.
As laid down in recital 113 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation did not bring into light any potential inefficiency of the Union industry and the claims in this regard were rejected.
Den pågældende part påstod i den forbindelse, at produktionsstoppene i forbindelse med vedligeholdelsesarbejde, integration af en tidligere tilknyttet virksomhed, stigningen i arbejdskraftomkostningerne og forestående omfattende investeringer og deres indvirkning på EU-erhvervsgrenens situation ikke var blevet undersøgt.
Following disclosure, an interested party reiterated its claims regarding the inefficiencies of the Union Industry.
I modsætning til partens påstand blev ovennævnte faktorer blev analyseret af Kommissionen, hvilket fremgår af betragtning 94-96 (produktionsstop i forbindelse med vedligeholdelsesarbejde), 89 og 90 (integration af en tidligere tilknyttet virksomhed), 91 (arbejdskraftomkostninger) samt 82 og 83 (investeringer) nedenfor, men undersøgelsen påviste ingen potentiel ineffektivitet i EU-erhvervsgrenen.
In this respect the party concerned alleged that the maintenance shutdowns, the integration of its former affiliated company, the increase in labour cost and upcoming important investments and its effect on the situation of the Union industry were not investigated.
Påstanden blev derfor afvist.
In contrast to what was claimed, the abovementioned factors were indeed analysed by the Commission as set out in recitals 94 to 96 (maintenance shutdowns), recitals 89 and 90 (integration of the former affiliated company), recital 91 (labour costs) and recitals 82 and 83 (investments) below but did not point to any potential inefficiency of the Union industry.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger om ovenstående, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 113 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
This claim was therefore rejected.
Finanskrisen
In the absence of any other comments concerning the above, the conclusions reached in recital 113 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Da der ikke blev fremsat bemærkninger om virkningerne af finanskrisen, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 114 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The financial crisis
Investeringer og EU's gældende sikkerhedsforskrifter
In the absence of any comments regarding the effect of the financial crisis, the conclusions reached in recital 114 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de foreløbige konklusioner gentog en interesseret part sin påstand om, at EU-erhvervsgrenens store investeringer havde forårsaget skaden.
Investments and EU regulatory safety requirements
Parten påstod, at det var irrelevant, om investeringerne var nødvendige, da kun deres virkning for EU-erhvervsgrenens situation skulle analyseres og især deres virkning for EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet.
Following provisional disclosure, one interested party claimed that the high level of investments made by the Union industry caused the injury.
Parten uddybede ikke, i hvilket omfang EU-erhvervsgrenens investeringer kunne have haft en virkning på rentabiliteten.
This party argued that it would be irrelevant whether investments were necessary, as only their effect on the situation of the Union industry should be analysed and in particular their effects on the profitability of the Union industry.
EU-erhvervsgrenens investeringer var, jf. betragtning 116 i forordningen om midlertidig told, baseret på rimelige forretningsmæssige beslutninger og kan derfor ikke betragtes som unødvendige.
This party did not explain to what extent the investments made by the Union industry could have had an impact on their profitability.
Desuden afskrives investeringsudgifter over længere tid og havde således ingen væsentlige virkninger for EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet.
As described in recital 116 of the provisional Regulation the investment made by the Union industry were based on reasonable business decisions and could not be considered as undue.
Den interesserede parts påstande i den henseende bør derfor afvises.
Moreover, investment costs are depreciated over time and as such did not have any significant impact on the Union industry's profitability.
Efter fremlæggelsen af konklusionerne gentog denne interesserede part sine påstande om, at skaden forvoldtes af de gældende sikkerhedsforskrifter og de omfattende investeringer, som EU-erhvervsgrenen har foretaget for at opfylde disse forskrifter.
The interested party's claims in this regard were therefore rejected.
Parten gentog også, at det var irrelevant, om disse beslutninger var rimelige forretningsmæssige beslutninger, og at analysen kun burde have vurderet virkningen på rentabiliteten.
Following disclosure, this interested party reiterated its claims that the injury was caused by the regulatory safety requirements and the high level of investments made by the Union industry to address such requirements.
Det blev i den forbindelse endelig påstået, at det var irrelevant, om investeringsomkostningerne afskrives over længere tid.
They also reiterated that it would be irrelevant that these decisions were reasonable business decisions and that the analysis should only have taken into consideration the effect on the profitability.
Vurderingen tog i modsætning til påstanden hensyn til investeringernes indvirkning på EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet.
In this regard it was finally claimed that the fact that investment costs were depreciated over time was irrelevant.
Afskrivningen af investeringsomkostningerne er en omkostningsfaktor, som er relevant for fastlæggelsen af rentabiliteten, og blev derfor taget i betragtning.
In contrast to what was claimed, the assessment took into consideration the effect of the investments made on the Union industry's profitability.
Denne påstand blev derfor afvist.
The depreciation of investment costs is a cost factor which is relevant in the establishment of profitability and had to be therefore taken into consideration.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende virkningerne af investeringerne og EU's gældende sikkerhedsforskrifter, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 115 og 116 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
This argument was therefore rejected.
Råvareomkostninger og andre omkostninger
In the absence of any other comments with regard to the effects of investments and EU regulatory safety requirements, the conclusions in recitals 115 and 116 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Produktionsomkostninger
Costs of raw materials and other costs
En interesseret part påstod, at faldet i rentabiliteten skyldtes den samtidige stigning i produktionsomkostningerne generelt.
Cost of production
Skaden skyldes derfor snarere denne stigning i produktionsomkostningerne end importen fra Indonesien.
One interested party claimed that the profitability decreased due to the parallel increase in the cost of production in general.
Stigningen i produktionsomkostningerne kunne, jf. betragtning 100 i forordningen om midlertidig told, ikke afspejles i salgsprisen som følge af prispresset fra den indonesiske import af MNG.
Therefore the injury is caused by this increase in cost of production rather than by the imports from Indonesia.
Den faldende rentabilitet skyldes derfor hovedsagelig stigningen i dumpingimporten, og påstanden bør afvises.
As set out in recital 100 of the provisional Regulation, the cost of production increase could not be reflected in the sales price due to the price pressure exerted by Indonesian imports of MSG.
Integration af en tidligere tilknyttet virksomhed
The decreasing profitability was therefore mainly due to the increase in dumped imports and this argument should be rejected.
Samme interesserede part påstod, at man ikke i tilstrækkelig grad havde analyseret virkningerne for EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet som følge af integrationen af en tidligere tilknyttet virksomhed.
Integration of a former affiliated company
Parten påstand, at denne integration havde en negativ indvirkning på rentabiliteten og dermed forvoldte EU-erhvervsgrenen skade.
The same interested party claimed that the effects of the integration of a former affiliated company on the profitability of the Union industry was insufficiently analysed.
Kommissionen foretog en yderligere undersøgelse af virkningerne for de relevante skadesindikatorer såsom produktionsomkostninger, beskæftigelse, investeringer og rentabilitet som følge af integrationen af en tidligere tilknyttet virksomhed.
This party alleged that this integration had a negative impact on profitability and therefore caused the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Det skal bemærkes, at den pågældende tilknyttede virksomhed kun var beskæftiget med salg af den pågældende vare.
The Commission further investigated the effects of the integration of a former affiliated company on the relevant injury indicators such as cost of production, employment, investment and profitability.
Det blev konkluderet, at EU-erhvervsgrenen var rentabel i det regnskabsår, hvor integrationen fandt sted (2011/12).
It is noted that the affiliated company in question was only involved in selling the product concerned.
Det efterfølgende regnskabsår (2012/13) var rentabiliteten negativ.
It was found that the Union industry was profitable during the financial year in which the integration took place (FY2011/2012).
En række parter påstod, at stigningen i arbejdskraftomkostningerne forvoldte EU-erhvervsgrenen skade.
On this basis, the analysis did not confirm that the integration of the former affiliated company had a significant negative impact on profitability and the claims made in this regard should therefore be rejected.
Selv om stigningen i de samlede omkostninger også skyldtes stigningen i arbejdskraftomkostningerne i den betragtede periode, viste undersøgelsen, at virkningen af stigningen i arbejdskraftomkostningerne for de samlede produktionsomkostninger ikke var markant (der kan af fortrolighedshensyn ikke gives præcise tal).
Labour costs
På dette grundlag kunne det ikke antages, at stigningen i arbejdskraftomkostningerne havde forårsaget EU-erhvervsgrenen væsentlig skade, og påstandene bør afvises.
Several parties claimed that the increase in labour costs caused the injury suffered by the Union industry.