natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I henhold til civillovens artikel 1307 gælder det, at hvis genstanden for en ugyldig kontrakt ikke kan returneres, fordi den er gået tabt, skal den pågældende part returnere værdien af genstanden på det tidspunkt, hvor den gik tabt.
The Commission doubted that there was an objective of common interest which could justify selective support to a very strong actor in a highly competitive economic sector.
Formålet er at genoprette situationen som om, at kontrakten aldrig var blevet indgået.
Accordingly, the Commission invited Spain and interested parties to provide relevant information on whether the transfer of plot B-32 to Real Madrid under the 1998 implementation agreement was indeed legally impossible for the Madrid City Council and on the possible consequences under Spanish law thereof.
Spanien gør gældende, at en kontrakt, der omfatter flere genstande og forpligtelser, bør betragtes som ugyldig i sin helhed, medmindre det kan antages, at det ville have været parternes hensigt at opretholde den resterende del af kontrakten.
The Commission also invited comments on the value of the plots of land involved in the 2011 settlement agreement and the 2011 urban development agreement.
Dette afhænger af parternes hypotetiske hensigt.
COMMENTS FROM SPAIN
Spanien mener ikke, at der er noget, der berettiger den antagelse, at Madrids kommunalbestyrelse og Real Madrid ville have videreført resten af gennemførelsesaftalen fra 1998, hvis de havde vidst, at det var juridisk umuligt at overføre jordlod B-32 i henhold til aftalen.
Comments regarding the impossibility to transfer plot B-32
Med andre ord er Madrids kommunalbestyrelse forpligtet til at betale Real Madrid værdien af de 15000 m2 af grunden i Ciudad Deportiva, da den blev solgt, som ifølge Spanien var 53578623 EUR.
Spain confirmed that the transfer of plot B-32 was and is legally impossible.
En sådan fremgangsmåde ville være meget mere gunstig for Real Madrid og meget mere ufordelagtig for Madrids kommunalbestyrelse end det, der blev aftalt i forligsaftalen fra 2011.
Spain argues that the legal situation regarding the transferability of the plot was at least unclear when the 1998 Agreement was concluded.
Dette krav afhænger ikke af kreditors hensigt eller skyld.
Spain is of the opinion that that judgment concerned legislation already in force in 1998, when the 1998 implementation agreement between the Madrid City Council and Real Madrid was concluded.
Derfor opfyldt Madrids kommunalbestyrelse med forligsaftalen fra 2011 sine eksisterende retlige forpligtelser over for Real Madrid i henhold til gennemførelsesaftalen fra 1998.
According to Spain, the consequence of that legal impossibility would be, in accordance with Article 1303 of the Civil Code, that the contracting parties return what they received mutually.
Hvad angår den mulige ændring af den foreskrevne anvendelse af jordlod B-32 i PGOU, bekræfter Spanien, at det i princippet ligger inden for Madrids kommunalbestyrelses beføjelser at foreslå de regionale myndigheder at ændre PGOU.
In accordance with Article 1307 of the Civil Code, where the thing subject of the void contract cannot be returned, because it has been lost, the party must return the value of the thing at the time it has been lost.
Spanien gør imidlertid gældende, at sådanne ændringer skal tjene den almene interesse.
The objective would be to re-establish the situation as if the contract never existed.
Der henvises til det retlige princip om opretholdelse af offentlige arealer, hvorefter det er forbudt at sælge offentligt ejet jord uden at købe nye jord med tilsvarende karakteristika.
Spain argues that a contract covering several objects and obligations should be considered void in its entirety except if one can assume that it would have been the will of the parties to maintain the rest of the contract.
At undgå et stort erstatningskrav vil ikke være grund nok til at ændre arealanvendelsen i denne sag, fordi en sådan ændring ville være vilkårlig.
This depends on the hypothetical will of the parties.
Artikel 67, stk. 2, i lov nr. 9/2001 giver ikke mulighed for at tilbagetrække jord, der er klassificeret til offentlig anvendelse, uden kompenserende foranstaltninger i det samme område.
Spain is of the opinion that nothing seems to justify the assumption that the Madrid City Council and Real Madrid would have continued with the rest of the 1998 implementation agreement, had they known of the legal impossibility to transfer plot B-32 under that agreement.
Endelig bemærkede Spanien, at hvis Real Madrid havde overtaget grunden i 2011, ville der ikke være tale om statsstøtte, så den kompensation, den modtog i henhold til forligsaftalen fra 2011 fra Madrids kommunalbestyrelse for manglende overførsel af grunden, kan ikke udgøre statsstøtte, fordi kompensationen svarer til værdien af grunden i 2011.
In that context, Spain assumes that the 1998 Agreement is void in its entirety and concludes that Real Madrid and the Madrid City Council would also have to return the other pieces of land covered by the 1996 swap agreement and the 1998 implementation agreement.
Bemærkninger vedrørende vurderingen af jordlod B-32
However, since those plots of land have been sold in the meantime and cannot be returned in kind, the Madrid City Council would have to return the values of those plots at the time they were sold.
Hvad angår vurderingen af grunden, forklarer Spanien, at vurderingen blev foretaget af den tekniske afdeling i Madrid kommune på grundlag af fastlagte kriterier, som blev anvendt for al kommunalt ejet jord.
In other words, the Madrid City Council is obliged to pay Real Madrid the value of the 15000 square metres of the land in ‘Ciudad Deportiva’ when it was sold which, according to Spain, amounted to EUR 53578623.
De eksperter, som denne afdeling anvender, er bundet af principperne om objektivitet, professionalisme og upartiskhed.
Such an outcome would be much more beneficial for Real Madrid and much more onerous for the Madrid City Council than what was agreed to under the 2011 settlement agreement.
Offentlige forvaltninger skal i henhold til lovgivningen i første omgang få ejendomsværdien vurderet af deres egne ansatte og tjenester.
Spain furthermore refers to case-law that supports its view that the Madrid City Council would have to compensate Real Madrid for the non-fulfilment of its obligations under the 1998 implementation agreement.
På grundlag af en beregningsmodel (Módulo básico de repercusión de suelo, »MBR«) fastsættes der en kvadratmeterpris for Madrid.
It refers to judgments which concern impossibility ex post, intentionally or by negligence caused by one of the parties.
Værdien af jordlod B-32 blev i 2011 vurderet som følger:
According to Spain, that case-law is based on the continuing validity of the contract and the non-fulfilment of it by one of the parties; the party which fulfils its part is entitled to the present value of what it did not receive because normally it should be in possession of it.
Areal: 70815 m2, heraf 35407 m2 med tilladelse til bebyggelse
That claim would exist independently from the intentions or the fault of the creditor.
MBR ifølge anordning fra økonomi- og erhvervsministeriet EHA/1213/2005: 588 EUR pr. m2
Spain refers to Article 1124 of the Civil Code, according to which a party may request compensation from its counterpart because of non-fulfilment of a valid bilateral contract, in case specific performance is no longer possible.
Indekskoefficient: 1,09.
Therefore, by the 2011 settlement agreement the Madrid City Council settled its existing legal obligations towards Real Madrid under the 1998 implementation agreement.
Resultatet af 35407 × 588 × 1,09 er 22693054,44 EUR.
Concerning the possible change of the designated use of plot B-32 in the PGOU, Spain confirms that it is, in principle, within the powers of the Madrid City Council to propose to the Community of Madrid an amendment of the PGOU.
Spanien henviser også til en rapport fra finansministeriet fra 2011, hvor værdien af jordlod B-32 blev anslået til 25776296 EUR.
However, Spain claims that such changes need to serve the general interest.
Spanien understreger, at det ville være juridisk forpligtet til med henblik på at opgøre sine samlede aktiver at vurdere alle de grunde, det ejer, uanset om de i juridisk forstand er offentligt eller privat område.
It refers to a legal principle of maintenance of public domain land that forbids the sale of publicly owned land without the acquisition of new land of similar characteristics.
Spanien kritiserer den undersøgelse, som CEIAM udførte for Kommissionen, fordi den i et af scenarierne tager udgangspunkt i, at grunden anvendes til socialt boligbyggeri.
The aim of avoiding a high compensation claim would not justify a change of the land zoning in the present case, since such a change would be arbitrary.
En sådan anvendelse ville ikke følge kriteriet om den højeste og bedste udnyttelse af grunden.
Article 67(2) of law 9/2001 does not allow re-affectation of land designated for public use without compensatory measures in the same area.
Derfor var den værdi, man kom frem til i undersøgelsen, 50 % lavere end ved anvendelse til offentlige formål (uso lucrativo de interés general, equipamiento singular: uddannelse, kulturelle tjenester og institutioner, hospitaler, kirker), hvilket er den højeste og bedste udnyttelse af jord afsat til offentlige formål.
Finally, Spain remarked that if Real Madrid would have obtained the ownership of the plot in 2011 no State aid would be present, so that the compensation it receives under the 2011 settlement agreement from Madrid City Council for its failure to transfer that plot of land cannot constitute State aid since that compensation is equal to the value of that plot of land in 2011.
Værdien i scenariet med anvendelse til private formål, som f.eks. boliger eller kontorer, ville igen være 30 % højere.
Comments regarding the valuation of plot B-32
Baseret på anvendelse af jorden til offentlige formål foreslår Spanien, at grundværdien beregnes ved hjælp af den simple kapitaliseringsmetode.
Regarding the valuation of the land, Spain explains that the valuation was made by the technical services of the municipality of Madrid on the basis of established criteria used for all the land in the ownership of the municipality.
Den tager udgangspunkt i den forventede salgspris pr. kvadratmeter, som er baseret på sammenlignelige projekter i 2011 i den del af Madrid.
The experts employed by those services are bound by the principles of objectivity, professionalism and impartiality.
Efter fradrag af anlægsomkostningerne, vurderet efter en standardmodel, som Madrid kommune anvender, ender Spanien på en værdi på 22708633,52 EUR.
Public administrations are required by law to establish land value in the first place by their own officials and services.
Denne vurdering er imidlertid baseret på den antagelse, at klassificeringen af grunden er »forskellige offentlige formål«, og Spanien indrømmer, at den nuværende klassificering af grunden ikke er »forskellige offentlige formål«, men »offentlig sportsbrug«, og at anvendelse til andre aktiviteter end sport ville kræve en formel ændring af den kommunale arealanvendelsesplan.
On the basis of a calculation model (Módulo básico de repercusión de suelo, hereinafter: ‘MBR’) a price per square metre is set for Madrid.
Spanien foreslår også at sammenligne med en anden grund, som er klassificeret til hospitalsbrug.
The value of plot B-32 in 2011 was determined as follows:
Den grund blev i en uafhængig vurdering vurderet til 900 EUR pr. kvadratmeter bebygget areal.
Area: 70815 square metres, of which 35407 square metres allowed for construction;
Grunden skulle stadig købes af Madrids kommunalbestyrelse og byggemodnes.
MBR according to the Order of the Ministry of Economy and Industry EHA/1213/2005: EUR 588 per square metre;
Bemærkninger vedrørende værdien af arealet omkring Bernabéu stadion
The result of 35407 × 588 × 1,09 is EUR 22693054,44.
Hvad angår ejendomsplanerne i byudviklingsaftalen fra 2011, mente Spanien, at dom nr. 77/2015 fra Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid af 2. februar 2015 annullerede ændringen af PGOU med hensyn til arealet rundt om Bernabéu og medfører, at byudviklingsaftalen fra 2011 ikke kan træde i kraft.
Spain also refers to the report of the Ministry of Finance of 2011, where the value of plot B-32 was estimated at EUR 25776296.
Efter offentliggørelsen af åbningsafgørelsen modtog Kommissionen bemærkninger fra Real Madrid, foreningen Ecologistas en Acción, Asociación para la Defensa del Estado de Derecho samt fra de borgere, der havde underrettet Kommissionen om den pågældende ejendomshandel.
Regarding the study prepared for the Commission by CEIAM, Spain criticises that study since it bases one of the scenarios of the valuation on the use of the plot for social housing.
Bemærkninger fra Real Madrid
Such a use would not follow the assumption of highest and best use of the ground.
Bemærkninger vedrørende konsekvenserne af Madrids kommunalbestyrelses undladelse af at overføre jordlod B-32
Therefore the study arrived at a value that was 50 % below the value of a use for public services (uso lucrativo de interés general, equipamiento singular: education, cultural services and institutions, hospitals, churches) which represents the highest and best use of land devoted for public purposes.
Med hensyn til baggrunden for gennemførelsesaftalen fra 1998 forklarer Real Madrid, at Madrids kommunalbestyrelse havde en interesse i Ciudad Deportiva, fordi den planlagde at bygge på dette centralt beliggende område, og Real Madrid havde brug for at afhænde anlægsaktiver for at tilbagebetale gæld.
The value in the scenario of use for private purposes, like housing or offices, would be another 30 % higher.
I 1998 kunne denne ændring af den eksisterende klassificering være blevet gennemført uden nogen specifikke lovmæssige forhindringer.
On the basis of land use for public services, Spain proposes a calculation of the land value by the method of simple capitalisation.
Situationen ændrede sig imidlertid i 2001, da lov nr. 9/2001 trådte i kraft.
It starts from the expected sales price per building square metre which is based on comparable projects in 2011 in that part of Madrid.
I henhold til artikel 67.2 i lov nr. 9/2001 skal beslutningen om at afklassificere jord til offentlige formål (desafecte el suelo de un destino público) ledsages af kompenserende foranstaltninger med henblik på at opretholde kvaliteten og mængden af sådanne offentlige ressourcer i det berørte område [6].
After deduction of the construction costs, determined according to a standard model applied by the municipality of Madrid, Spain arrives at a value of EUR 22708633,52.
Hvis Madrids kommunalbestyrelse skulle have opfyldt sin kontraktlige forpligtelse til at overføre jordlod B-32 til Real Madrid i 2011, ville det have betydet, at Real Madrid ville have fået overført jord med en markedsværdi på 22693054,44 EUR.
Thus several years would have passed until it was possible to build something on the land.
Derfor svarede den økonomiske værdi af Real Madrids ret til at kræve fuldbyrdelse af kontrakten til markedsværdien af jordlod B-32 i 2011.
That situation had completely changed in 2011.
Real Madrid antyder, at det ikke ville have givet mening, hvis den havde accepteret et forlig, som vurderede værdien af dens kontraktlige ret til jordlod B-32 til at være lavere end den aktuelle markedsværdi.
In both cases the valuation followed the usual standards applied by the Madrid City Council for land valuation.
Alternativet til forligsaftalen fra 2011 ville have været, at Real Madrid fastholdt sine rettigheder.
Comments regarding the value of the land around the Bernabéu stadium
Parterne havde for mange år siden solgt grundene til tredjeparter, som havde købt dem i god tro.
Comments by Real Madrid
I sådanne tilfælde skal parterne i stedet ifølge spansk ret give den anden part den nuværende værdi af den jord, der skulle have været tilbageleveret, på tidspunktet for domsafsigelsen.
Comments regarding the consequences of the failure of the Madrid City Council to transfer plot B-32
På grundlag af juridisk rådgivning og en vurderingsrapport fra ejendomsrådgivningsfirmaet Aguirre Newman (»Aguirre Newman-rapporten«), som den modtog i april 2014, forklarer Real Madrid de bestemmelser i spansk privatret, der ville have været gældende for tilbagelevering i 2011, og hvad de økonomiske konsekvenser af tilbagelevering ville have været.
Regarding the background of the 1998 implementation agreement, Real Madrid explains that the Madrid City Council had an interest in the Ciudad Deportiva, because it planned to develop that centrally located area, and Real Madrid needed to divest fixed assets to repay debts.
Ifølge Real Madrid ville tilbagelevering have udløst følgende betalinger mellem Madrids kommunalbestyrelse og Real Madrid: Madrids kommunalbestyrelse ville skulle betale den aktuelle værdi (i 2011) af de 15000 m2 i Ciudad Deportiva, vurderet af Aguirre Newman til 65,346 mio. EUR [8], til Real Madrid, Real Madrid ville skulle betale værdien af jordlod 33 og 34 i 2011, vurderet af Aguirre Newman til 32,246 mio. EUR [9], til Madrids kommunalbestyrelse.
Real Madrid states that it had repeatedly requested the Madrid City Council to transfer plot B-32.
Endelig gør Real Madrid gældende, at den kunne have krævet erstatning for den skade, den måtte have lidt som følge af Madrids kommunalbestyrelses kontraktbrud.
Real Madrid agrees that the classification of the plot as for ‘basic sport use’ (deportivo de carácter básico) constitutes a legal obstacle for its sale to private parties.
I henhold til civillovens artikel 1124 og fast retspraksis er ophævelse og erstatning i kontraktforhold indbyrdes forenelige retsmidler.
It considers, however, that the transfer of the plot could be made possible.
Formålet med denne erstatning var at stille kreditor som om, debitor havde opfyldt sine forpligtelser i henhold til kontrakten.
The urban planning classification was neither inalterable nor beyond the control of the Madrid City Council.
I henhold til civillovens artikel 1307 gælder det, at hvis en genstand ikke kan tilbageleveres, fordi den er gået tabt, er det genstandens værdi på det tidspunkt, hvor den gik tabt, plus renter, der skal tilbageleveres.
Such a step would have shifted the land from the ‘public domain’ into the ‘private domain’, with a view to enabling compliance with the contractual obligation to transfer the plot to Real Madrid.
Salg til en tredjepart i god tro sidestilles med tab [10], hvilket betyder, at de jordlod, der var blevet solgt, efter at gennemførelsesaftalen fra 1998 blev indgået, i princippet ikke kunne tilskrives deres aktuelle værdi, men den værdi, de havde, da de blev solgt til tredjepart.
In 1998, such a change to the existing classification could have been implemented without facing any specific statutory obstacles.
Real Madrid skulle betale provenuet fra salget af jordlod 33 og 34 i 1999 på omkring 12,9 mio. EUR plus renter til Madrids kommunalbestyrelse.
Article 67.2 of law 9/2001 provides that the decision to declassify land intended for public use (desafecte el suelo de un destino público) must be accompanied by compensatory measures with a view to maintain the quality and quantity of such public resources in the affected area [6].
De grundværdier, der blev lagt til grund i 1998, blev bestemt af erfarne medarbejdere i Madrids kommunalbestyrelses byplanlægningsafdeling (»Gerencia Municipal de Urbanismo«) under anvendelse af vurderingsmetoden i spansk ret.
In consequence, the Madrid City Council would have had to acquire land at Las Tablas that was similar in size to plot B-32 and classify it as for ‘basic sport use’.
Ifølge disse vurderinger havde de jordlod, der skulle overføres til klubben, samme samlede værdi som de 15000 m2, der skulle overføres til Madrids kommunalbestyrelse.
To have done so would have been very expensive, since any available land in that area was classified, in 2011, as ‘residential’ or ‘commercial’.
Tabel 1
Land with those classifications commanded a much higher market price than land classified as for ‘basic sport use’.
Vurderinger i gennemførelsesaftalen fra 1998
In fact, a study submitted by Real Madrid estimates the cost for the Madrid City Council for such compensatory measures to be between EUR 58 million and EUR 240 million, i.e. much more than the EUR 22693054,44 compensation agreed to under the 2011 settlement agreement [7].
Madrids kommunalbestyrelse
Therefore, from a legal point of view, the Madrid City Council could have overcome the obstacles to contractual performance had it wanted to.
Grunde, der skulle overføres til Madrids kommunalbestyrelse
The Madrid City Council could only have avoided liability if the obstacles to performance were insuperable and wholly beyond its control.
Jordlod B-32
For the Madrid City Council to have complied with its contractual obligation to transfer plot B-32 to Real Madrid in 2011 would have implied that Real Madrid would have obtained land with a market value of EUR 22693054,44.
15000 m2 i Ciudad Deportiva
Therefore, the economic value of Real Madrid's right to require performance of the contract was identical to the market value of plot B-32 in 2011.
Jordlod B-33 og B-34
Real Madrid suggests that it would not have made any sense for it to accept a settlement that assigned a value to its contractual right to plot B-32 that was lower than the plot's current market value.
I alt
Real Madrid would not have been willing to accept a settlement that valued its right to plot B-32 at the market value of that plot in 1998 or in 2003.
Dermed fremgik det ikke af de vurderinger, som Madrids kommunalbestyrelse i 1998 anvendte som grundlag for overførslen af jordlod B-32, 33 og 34, at dette ville overkompensere Real Madrid.
Real Madrid would have brought court proceedings to protect the full value of its right to require performance of the 1998 implementation agreement.
Den vurderingsmetode, der blev anvendt til at vurdere værdien af grundene i aftalen fra 1998, er den metode, som de offentlige myndigheder i hele Spanien anvender til grundvurdering [12].
The alternative to the 2011 settlement agreement would have been that Real Madrid would have insisted on its contractual rights.
De embedsmænd, der udarbejder vurderingsrapporter, er eksperter på området og har en personlig pligt til at handle i overensstemmelse med gældende lovgivning og procedurer samt overholde principperne om objektivitet, neutralitet og upartiskhed.
That could have been compensation for breach of contract if the breach is caused intentionally or by negligence on the basis of Article 1101 of the Civil Code.
Det ville være ulovligt i henhold til spansk lovgivning bevidst at op- eller nedjustere en vurdering til fordel for en privat aktør på bekostning af det offentlige.
Real Madrid could also have terminated the contract pursuant to Article 1124 of the Civil Code, with the consequence of the right to restitution of what has already been performed according to Article 1123 of the Civil Code and a claim for damages.
Af disse grunde mener Real Madrid, at de vurderinger, der blev foretaget i 1998 til gennemførelsesaftalen fra 1998, var foretaget af uafhængige eksperter som anført i meddelelsen om salg af jord.
Real Madrid underlines that the 2011 settlement agreement is more advantageous for the Madrid City Council than full restitution.
Endvidere vurderes markedsværdien i 1998 af jordlod B-32 og de 15000 m2 i Ciudad Deportiva i Aguirre Newman-rapporten.
Restitution would have entailed a return to the situation existing before the 1998 implementation agreement.
Tabel 2
In principle, the Madrid City Council would be compelled to return the 15000 square metres it received at Ciudad Deportiva to Real Madrid and Real Madrid would have had to return to the Madrid City Council plots 33 and 34.
Vurderinger i gennemførelsesaftalen fra 1998 sammenlignet med Aguirre Newman-rapporten
However, to return the plots as such would not be feasible.
Værdi (Aguirre Newman)
The parties sold the land many years ago to third parties that acquired the land in good faith.
Værdi (aftalen fra 1998)
In such cases, the parties must instead, according to Spanish law, return to the other party the current value of the land that is subject to restitution at the time the judgment is handed down.