natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En samarbejdsvillig ikke forretningsmæssigt forbundet importør hævdede, at produktionsmængden, produktionskapaciteten og kapacitetsudnyttelsen burde have været beregnet på grundlag af data fra de stikprøveudvalgte EU-producenter alene.
One cooperating unrelated importer argued that production volume, production capacity and capacity utilisation should have been established on the basis of the data of the sampled Union producers only.
Da der er tale om makroøkonomiske indikatorer, bør de fastsættes for alle EU-producenterne for at fastlægge et hensigtsmæssigt og fuldstændigt billede af EU-erhvervsgrenens situation.
However as these are macroeconomic indicators they should be established at the level of all Union producers in order to establish a meaningful and complete picture of the situation of the Union industry.
En anden part anmodede Kommissionen om at uddybe forklaringerne vedrørende afstemningen af de forskellige foreliggende data vedrørende Unionens samlede produktionskapacitet.
Another party requested the Commission to give further explanations concerning the reconciliation of the different data available related to the total Union production capacity.
En anden part mente, at Unionens samlede produktion og produktionskapacitet skulle have været indsamlet fra EU-producenterne i stikprøven, da dette ville have givet et mere pålideligt resultat.
Another party suggested that the total Union production and production capacity should have been obtained from the Union producers selected in the sample as this would have given a more reliable result.
I den forbindelse blev det hævdet, at offentligt tilgængelige data var upræcise på grund af den fortrolige karakter af disse data, og at alle forskningscentre eller konsulenter måtte basere deres analyser på en række beregninger og antagelser.
In this regard, it was alleged that publicly available data were imprecise due to the confidential character of these data and that any research centre or consultant had to base its analysis on a number of estimations and assumptions.
Det præciseres, at den årlige EU-produktion blev beregnet på grundlag af de tal, som EU-producenterne indberettede til konsulenten.
It is clarified that the annual Union production was calculated on the basis of the figures reported by the Union producers to the consultant.
Når den årlige produktion for en bestemt EU-producent ikke kunne opnås for et specifikt år, blev den anslået ved at anvende kapacitetsudnyttelsen fra det foregående år på den nye produktionskapacitet for det pågældende år.
When the annual production of a certain Union producer could not be obtained for a specific year, this was estimated by applying the capacity utilisation rate from the previous year to the new production capacity of that year.
Institutionerne har også sammenlignet konsulentens tal med de tal, som EU-erhvervsgrenen oplyste i besvarelserne af spørgeskemaet om den økonomiske situation forud for indledningen.
The Institutions have also compared the figure obtained by the consultant with the figures reported in the replies of the Union industry to the standing questionnaires prior to initiation.
Tallene er ens.
Both figures are similar.
For så vidt angår anmodningen om at uddybe forklaringerne vedrørende afstemningen af de forskellige foreliggende data vedrørende EU-produktionskapaciteten skal det bemærkes, at disse oplysninger allerede blev fremlagt i det åbne dossier, som er til rådighed for de interesserede parter.
As regards the request to provide further explanations concerning the reconciliation of the different data available for Union production capacity, it is noted that this information had already been provided in the open file open for inspection to the interested parties.
Endelig er EU-produktionen og EU-produktionskapaciteten makroøkonomiske indikatorer og skal derfor fastsættes for hele EU-erhvervsgrenen, og ikke kun for de EU-producenter, der indgik i stikprøven.
Finally, the Union production and production capacity are macroeconomic indicators and therefore have to be established at the level of the entire Union industry rather than on the level of the sampled Union producers.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse af oplysninger påstod en part, at den anvendte metode til indsamling af produktionsdata (hovedsagelig interviews og besøg på produktionsanlæg) ikke gav pålidelige data på grund af den fortrolige karakter af disse oplysninger, og at virksomhederne derfor ikke var tilbøjelige til at fremlægge dem.
After final disclosure, one party argued that the methodology used to collect production data (mainly interviews and visits of production sites) did not allow for reliable results due to the confidential character of these data and as a consequence the reluctance of companies to disclose them.
En sådan metode kan således ikke betragtes som hensigtsmæssig.
Such methodology cannot therefore be considered as adequate.
Dette blev angiveligt bekræftet af, at selv om konsulenten anvendte et meget højere antal EU-producenter end det antal, som blev taget i betragtning af Kommissionen ved gennemgangen af den økonomiske situation ved indledningen af undersøgelsen, er den samlede produktionsmængde, der er etableret af konsulenten lavere end den samlede produktionsmængde, som Kommissionen har fastsat for undersøgelsen af den økonomiske situation.
This was allegedly confirmed by the fact that although a much higher number of Union producers was used by the consultant than the one taken into account by the Commission during the examination of standing at initiation stage, the total production volume established by the consultant is lower than the total production volume established by the Commission for the purpose of the examination of the standing.
Denne part påstod yderligere, at oplysningerne vedrørende denne skadesindikator derfor ikke kan betragtes som positivt bevismateriale, jf. grundforordningens artikel 8, stk. 1.
This party further claimed that consequently the information related to this injury indicator cannot be considered as positive evidence within the meaning of Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Det skal først præciseres, at antallet af producenter taget i betragtning af konsulenten på den ene side og Kommissionen på den anden side var stort set det samme, og argumentet om, at resultaterne var inkonsekvente, måtte derfor afvises.
It is first clarified that the number of producers taken into consideration by the consultant on the one hand and the Commission on the other hand was largely the same and that the argument that results were inconsistent had therefore to be rejected.
Det skal endvidere erindres, at de data, som blev indsamlet af konsulenten, blev krydstjekket med andre kilder, hvor dette var muligt, og det blev konkluderet, at estimationerne var tilstrækkeligt pålidelige.
It is further recalled that the data collected by the consultant were cross checked with other sources wherever possible and it was found that the estimations were sufficiently reliable.
Det bekræftes derfor, at konsulentens produktionsdata blev betragtet som positivt bevismateriale, jf. grundforordningens artikel 8, stk. 1.
It is therefore confirmed that the information on production data provided by the consultant was considered as positive evidence within the meaning of Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
EU-erhvervsgrenens salgsmængde og markedsandel udviklede sig således i den betragtede periode:
The Union industry's sales volume and market share developed as follows over the period considered:
I en situation med en stigning i forbruget på 221 % gav dette sig imidlertid udslag i et fald i EU-erhvervsgrenens markedsandel fra 19 % i 2009 til 13 % i UP.
However, in the context of an increase in consumption of 221 %, this was translated into a decrease of the Union industry's market share from 19 % in 2009 to 13 % during the IP.
Hvad angår celler, steg EU-erhvervsgrenens salg kun marginalt med 5 %, mens forbruget steg med 87 %, hvilket resulterede i et fald i markedsandelen fra 68 % i 2009 til 38 % i UP.
As regards cells, the Union industry's sales increased only marginally by 5 % while consumption increased by 87 % resulting in a market share reduction from 68 % in 2009 to 38 % in the IP.
I en situation med stigende forbrug steg EU-erhvervsgrenens salg af moduler og celler meget mindre end importen fra det pågældende land.
In response to a growing consumption, the Union industry's sales of modules and cells grew much less than the imports from the country concerned.
Markedsandelene for moduler og celler faldt således i den betragtede periode.
As a consequence, the market shares for modules and cells decreased over the period considered.
En interesseret part påstod, at EU-erhvervsgrenens markedsandel for moduler allerede kun var på 19 % i 2009, og at et fald på 6 procentpoint i den betragtede periode ikke kan betragtes som skade.
One interested party claimed that the market share of the Union industry for modules was already only 19 % in 2009 and that a decrease by 6 percentage points during the period considered cannot be considered as injury.
Faldet i markedsandelen på 6 procentpoint i den betragtede periode skal ses på baggrund af en stigning i EU-forbruget af moduler på over 200 % i den samme periode.
The decrease in market share by 6 percentage points over the period considered has to be seen against the background of an increase of the Union consumption for modules by over 200 % over the same period.
Selv i en situation med et øget forbrug som omtalt ovenfor kunne EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke øge sine salgsmængder tilsvarende og tabte markedsandele.
As mentioned above, even under the scenario of an increased consumption it could not increase its sales volume accordingly and suffered losses in market share.
En part påstod, at den anvendte metode til indsamling af salgsdata (hovedsagelig interviews og besøg på produktionsanlæg) ikke gav pålidelige data på grund af den fortrolige karakter af disse oplysninger, og at virksomhederne derfor ikke var tilbøjelige til at fremlægge dem.
One party argued that the methodology used to collect sales data (mainly interviews and visits of production sites) did not allow for reliable results due to the confidential character of these data and as a consequence the reluctance of companies to disclose them.
De kan ligeledes ikke anses for at være positivt bevismateriale, jf. grundforordningens artikel 8, stk. 1.
Likewise, they cannot be considered as positive evidence within the meaning of Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Som nævnt i betragtning 482 blev de data, som blev indsamlet af konsulenten, krydstjekket med andre kilder, hvor dette var muligt, og det blev konkluderet, at estimationerne var tilstrækkeligt pålidelige.
As mentioned above in recital (482) above the data collected by the consultant were cross checked with other sources wherever possible and it was found that the estimations were sufficiently reliable.
Det bekræftes derfor, at konsulentens oplysninger om salgsdata blev betragtet som positivt bevismateriale, jf. grundforordningens artikel 8, stk. 1.
It is therefore confirmed that the information on sales data provided by the consultant was considered as positive evidence within the meaning of Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Moduler — beskæftigelse og produktivitet
Modules –employment and productivity
(kW/ansat)
(kW/employee)
Beskæftigelsen for moduler steg mellem 2009 og UP med 39 %, hvorimod den faldt med 9 % for celler.
Employment for modules increased between 2009 and the IP by 39 %, while it decreased by 9 % for cells.
Det skal dog bemærkes, at beskæftigelsen steg indtil 2011, hvorefter den faldt i UP for moduler.
However, it is noted that employment increased until 2011 and then decreased during the IP for modules.
For celler steg beskæftigelsen indtil 2010, hvorefter den faldt i 2011 og UP.
For cells, employment increased until 2010 and then decreased during 2011 and IP.
Den samlede produktivitet viste positive tendenser for moduler og celler, idet den steg med hhv. 34 % og 33 %.
The total productivity showed positive trends for modules and cells increasing by 34 % and 33 %.
Dette skyldes delvist EU-erhvervsgrenens indsats for at modvirke presset fra den subsidierede import fra Kina.
This is partly due to the efforts of the Union industry to respond to the pressure of the subsidised imports from the PRC.
I lighed med faldet i EU-produktionen af moduler mellem 2011 og UP faldt også beskæftigelsen for moduler i samme periode.
Therefore, in line with the decrease in Union production of modules between 2011 and the IP, employment for modules also decreased during the same period.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse af oplysninger hævdede en part, at metoden til fastsættelse af den samlede beskæftigelse i Unionen i den betragtede periode var ukorrekt.
Following final disclosure, one party claimed that the methodology to establish total employment in the Union during the period considered was incorrect.
Denne part hævdede, at i tilfælde hvor beskæftigelsestallet for en specifik EU-producent ikke forelå, blev der i stedet taget hensyn til den gennemsnitlige beskæftigelse for de EU-producenter, for hvilke disse oplysninger var til rådighed.
This party alleged that wherever the employment rate of a specific Union producer was not available, the average employment of those Union producers for which this information was available was taken into consideration instead.
Dette måtte afvises, da metoden til at fastlægge den samlede beskæftigelse var anderledes, dvs. i tilfælde, hvor beskæftigelsestallet for en bestemt EU-producent ikke forelå, blev dette tal anslået på grundlag af data fra samme virksomhed for de(t) tidligere år.
This had to be rejected as the methodology to establish total employment was different, i.e. in case employment data for a certain Union producer was not available, this figure was estimated on the basis of data of that same company from the previous year(s).
Som nævnt i betragtning 482 blev denne metode verificeret og fundet hensigtsmæssig.
As mentioned above in recital (482) this methodology was verified and found reasonable.
De udligningsberettigede subsidiers størrelse og genrejsningen efter tidligere subsidiering eller dumping
Magnitude of the amount of the countervailable subsidies and recovery from past subsidisation or dumping
Subsidiemargenerne ligger alle væsentligt over bagatelgrænsen.
All subsidy margins are significantly above the de minimis level.
Virkningen af de faktiske udligningsberettigede subsidiers størrelse for EU-erhvervsgrenen kan i betragtning af mængde og priser for importen fra det pågældende land betragtes som væsentlig.
As regards the impact of the magnitude of the amount of the countervailable subsidies on the Union industry, given the volume and prices of imports from the country concerned, the impact can be considered substantial.
Gennemsnitlig salgspris i Unionen på det frie marked
Average sales price in the Union on free market
Celler — gennemsnitlige salgspriser i Unionen
Cells- average sales prices in the Union
Salgspriserne faldt markant med 53 % for moduler og med 69 % for celler i den betragtede periode.
Sales prices fell sharply i.e. by 53 % for modules and by 69 % for cells during the period considered.
Dette skyldes især det stigende prispres fra den subsidierede import, som havde en negativ virkning på EU-erhvervsgrenens salgspriser, der faldt endnu mere end effektivitetsgevinsten.
This was mainly due to the increasing price pressure of the subsidised imports which had a negative effect on the sales prices of the Union industry which decreased even more than efficiency gains.
Dette kan ses af den negative tendens i EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet, jf. betragtning 579.
This can be seen in the negative trend of the Union industry's profitability as described in recital (579) below.
Alt i alt var der et væsentligt fald i de gennemsnitlige salgspriser og produktionsomkostningerne for den samme vare med en ødelæggende virkning på EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet.
Overall there was a significant decrease of the average sales price and the cost of production of the like product with devastating effect on Union industry's profitability.
En interesseret part anfægtede konklusionen om, at faldet i de gennemsnitlige salgspriser havde haft en ødelæggende virkning på EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet.
One interested party contested the findings that the decrease of the average sales prices had a devastating effect on the profitability of the Union industry.
Det blev påstået, at de gennemsnitlige produktionsomkostninger ligeledes faldt, og at et prisfald derfor er naturligt.
It claimed that the average cost of the Union industry decreased equally and that therefore a decrease in price is natural.
Det fremgik imidlertid, jf. betragtning 565, af undersøgelsen, at EU-erhvervsgrenens salgspriser faldt endnu mere end de gennemsnitlige produktionsomkostninger, og dette fald i omkostningerne var derfor ikke afspejlet i EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet.
However, as described in recital (565) above, the investigation established that Union industry sales price decreased even more than its average cost of production and therefore such decrease in costs was not reflected in the Union industry' profitability.
Det bekræftes derfor, at faldet i EU-erhvervsgrenens salgspriser havde en ødelæggende virkning på EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet, og påstandene blev afvist.
It is therefore confirmed that the decrease in sales price of the Union industry had a devastating effect on the profitability of the Union industry and the claims in this regard were rejected.
Begge disse konklusioner støttes af beviserne i betragtning 138 i forordningen om midlertidig antidumpingtold.
Both those statements are backed up with evidence in recital (138) to the provisional anti-dumping Regulation.
Den samlede stigning i lønomkostningerne kan delvis forklares ved den samtidige stigning i produktiviteten (moduler og celler) og udviklingen i inflationen.
The overall increase of labour cost can be partly explained by the simultaneous increase in productivity (modules and cells) and the evolution of inflation.
En interesseret part påstod, at der ikke var nogen inflation i den betragtede periode, og at den samlede stigning i arbejdskraftomkostningerne derfor ikke kunne have været forårsaget af denne faktor.
One interested party claimed that there has not been any inflation during the period considered and that therefore the overall increase of labour costs could not have been caused by this factor.
I modsætning til, hvad der blev påstået af parten, viste undersøgelsen, at der har været inflation i den betragtede periode, og at den samlede stigning i arbejdskraftomkostningerne, begrænset til moduler, kan forklares af inflationen og stigningen i produktiviteten.
In contrast to what was claimed by the party concerned, the investigation revealed that there has been inflation during the period considered and that the increase in labour cost, limited to modules, can be explained by the inflation and the increase in productivity.
En interesseret part påstod, at den væsentlige skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen havde lidt, skyldtes stigningen i arbejdskraftomkostningerne og det samtidige fald i produktiviteten.
One interested party claimed that the injurious situation of the Union industry was caused by the increase in labour costs and the parallel decrease in productivity.
Det skal imidlertid først bemærkes, at arbejdskraftomkostningerne var stabile for så vidt angår celler, hvorimod produktiviteten steg for både celler og moduler.
However, first it should be noted that labour cost remained stable in case of cells, while productivity increased both for cells and modules.
Stigningen for moduler kan derfor forklares ved stigningen i produktiviteten.
Therefore, the increase of the latter can be explained by increased productivity.
Desuden har undersøgelsen vist, at arbejdskraftomkostningerne ikke udgør en væsentlig del af produktionsomkostningerne, som allerede nævnt i betragtning 203 i forordningen om midlertidig antidumpingtold.
Moreover the investigation has shown that labour costs do not represent a significant part of the cost of production, as already cited in recital (203) to the provisional anti-dumping Regulation.
Lagerbeholdningerne steg markant med 129 % for moduler og med 302 % for celler i den betragtede periode.
Stocks increased significantly i.e. by 129 % for modules and by 302 % for cells over the period considered.
Vedrørende moduler steg lagerbeholdningerne støt og nåede meget høje niveauer i 2011 (stigning på 160 %), hvorimod de faldt i UP, men lå dog stadig på meget høje niveauer i forhold til begyndelsen af den betragtede periode.
Concerning modules, stocks increased continuously reaching very high levels in 2011 (by 160 %), while it decreased in the IP but still remaining at very high levels in comparison with the beginning of the period considered.
Undersøgelsen viste, at EU-producenterne i den aktuelle vanskelige periode har tendens til at have begrænsede lagre af samme vare og basere deres produktion på ordrer.
The investigation showed that given the adverse current situation, Union producers would tend to hold limited stocks for the like product, basing their production on orders.
Stigningen i lagerbeholdningerne for samme vare i den betragtede periode er derfor ikke en relevant faktor for at fastslå, om EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt væsentlig skade.
Therefore, the increase in stocks for the like product over the period considered is not a relevant factor in establishing if the Union industry suffered material injury.
En part fremførte, at præsentationen af lagerværdierne i betragtning 141 i forordningen om midlertidig antidumpingtold var misvisende, da lagerbeholdningerne blev udtrykt i kW i stedet for MW i modsætning til EU-erhvervsgrenens produktionsmængde.
One party argued that the presentation of the stock values in recital (141) to the provisional anti-dumping Regulation was misleading as stocks were expressed in kW rather than MW unlike the Union industry's production volume.
Uanset om lagrene udtrykkes i kW eller i MW, blev dette anset for irrelevant i afgørelsen af, om EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt væsentlig skade.
Whether stocks are expressed in kW or in MW as such was considered irrelevant in the determination whether or not the Union industry suffered material injury.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de endelige resultater påstod flere parter, at lagrene burde have været fastsat for hele EU-erhvervsgrenen, og at tallene for kun ti EU-producenter ikke var repræsentative.
After final disclosure, several parties claimed that stocks should have been determined for the whole Union industry and that the figures of only ten Union producers were not representative.
Det præciseres, at lagrene blev betragtet som en mikroøkonomisk indikator og derfor bør fastlægges på grundlag af de oplysninger, der er indsamlet på virksomhedsniveau, i dette tilfælde fra stikprøven af EU-producenter, som anses for at være repræsentativ for hele EU-erhvervsgrenen.
It is clarified that the stocks were considered as a microeconomic indicator and should therefore be established on the basis of the information collected on a per company basis, in this case from the sample of Union producers considered as representative for the whole Union industry.
Tabel 10–a:
Table 10–a
Rentabiliteten faldt med 11 procentpoint for moduler og 49 procentpoint for celler.
The profitability dropped by 11 percentage points for modules and by 49 percentage points for cells.
Rentabiliteten for samme vare steg mellem 2009 og 2010, hvorefter den faldt markant i 2011, hvor EU-erhvervsgrenen havde tab, og faldt yderligere markant i UP.
Profitability for the like product increased between 2009 and 2010 but then decreased significantly in 2011 where Union industry realized losses and further decreased significantly in the IP.
Tabet var særlig højt for celler.
Losses were particularly high for cells.
Tendensen for nettolikviditeten, som er de stikprøveudvalgte EU-producenters evne til at selvfinansiere deres aktiviteter, fulgte ligeledes en negativ tendens mellem 2009 og UP.
The trend of net cash flow, which is the ability of the sampled Union producers to self-finance their activities, likewise followed a negative trend between 2009 and the IP.