natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvad angår rapporten om overholdelse for 2013, indsendte Sri Lanka ikke visse af de oplysninger, der kræves om statistik, og om visse bevarelses- og forvaltningsforanstaltninger.
The Commission therefore considers that the sanctioning system introduced by Sri Lanka is manifestly inadequate and is clearly not proportionate to the seriousness of possible infringements, to the potential impact of the infringements on the resources and to the potential benefit that could derive from such illegal actions.
Hvad angår IOTC-resolution 10/08 [10] vedrørende listen over aktive fartøjer, fremlagde Sri Lanka f.eks. ikke oplysninger om det internationale radiokaldesignal for de enkelte fartøjer.
Consequently, the actions undertaken by Sri Lanka in light of its duties as a flag State are insufficient to comply with the provisions of Articles 118 of the UNCLOS and Articles 18, 19 and 20 of the UNFSA.
Hvad angår IOTC-resolution 06/03 [11] om indførelse af fartøjsovervågningssystemer (FOS), har Sri Lanka hverken fået udstyret sine fartøjer med en længde overalt på mere end 15 meter med FOS eller opført et fartøjsovervågningscenter (FOC).
In view of recitals 292 to 299 of the Decision of 15 November 2012 and the developments after 15 November 2012, the Commission takes the view, pursuant to Article 31(3) and 31(4)(a) of the IUU Regulation, that Sri Lanka has failed to discharge its duties under international law as a flag State in respect of IUU vessels and IUU fishing carried out or supported by fishing vessels flying its flag or by its nationals and has not taken sufficient action to counter documented and recurring IUU fishing by vessels previously flying its flag.
Sri Lanka har heller ikke indsendt den obligatoriske FOS-statusrapport.
Failure to cooperate and to enforce (Article 31(5)(b), (c) and (d) of the IUU Regulation)
Hvad angår IOTC-resolution 10/02 [12] om obligatoriske statistikkrav, har Sri Lanka hverken indberettet data om størrelsesfrekvens for kystfiskeri eller om fangster, indsats og størrelsesfrekvens i overensstemmelse med den standard, der kræves i resolutionen for kystfiskeri, overfladefiskeri og langlinefiskeri.
As described in recitals 302 to 311 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, the Commission analysed whether Sri Lanka cooperated effectively with the Commission on investigations and associated activities.
Sri Lanka har kun delvist overholdt IOTC-resolution 05/05 [13] om indberetning af data om hajer, eftersom fangstdataene for garn og langline er indberettet samlet.
Concerning the vessels referred to in recital 293 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, Sri Lanka was, as indicated in recital 296 of that Decision, obliged to report on a monthly basis on actions taken against those vessels.
Med hensyn til IOTC-resolution 12/05 [14] om omladninger til søs har Sri Lanka ikke indgivet den krævede rapport.
That reporting only materialised for 9 out of 12 months in 2013 and 2 out of 4 months in 2014.
Hvad angår IOTC-resolution 11/04 om observatørordningen [15], har Sri Lanka ikke gennemført det regionale observatørprogram, som det kræves i henhold til resolutionen.
In contravention with the provisions of Article 20 of the UNFSA which sets out obligations of States to investigate, cooperate either directly or through RFMO's to ensure compliance with and enforcement of RFMO conservation and management measures, Sri Lanka has therefore failed to fulfil its obligations under international law with respect to international cooperation and enforcement.
Sri Lanka har navnlig ikke oprettet observatørordningen for de obligatoriske 5 % til søs for fartøjer med en længde på over 24 m og overholder derfor ikke rapporteringsforpligtelsen for observatører.
As described in recital 302 of the Decision of 15 November 2012 as well as recital 45 above, Sri Lanka did not fulfil its monthly reporting obligations towards the IOTC for the 13 Sri Lankan vessels presumed to be involved in IUU activities but not listed by the IOTC.
Hvad angår rapporten om overholdelse for 2014, indsendte Sri Lanka ikke visse af de oplysninger, der kræves om statistik, og om visse bevarelses- og forvaltningsforanstaltninger.
Thus, Sri Lanka failed to demonstrate that it fulfils the conditions of Article 94(2)(b) of the UNCLOS which stipulates that a flag State assumes jurisdiction under its internal law over each ship flying its flag and its master, officers and crew.
Hvad angår IOTC-resolution 13/02 [16], har Sri Lanka ikke vedtaget lovgivning, der gør mærkning af udstyr obligatorisk.
Additionally, as described in recitals 306 to 307 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, the Commission analysed whether Sri Lanka took effective enforcement measures in respect to operators responsible for IUU fishing and whether sanctions of sufficient severity to deprive the offenders of the benefits accruing from IUU fishing were applied.
Hvad angår IOTC-resolution 13/08 [17], har Sri Lanka ikke indsendt en forvaltningsplan for anordninger, der tiltrækker fisk (FAD'er), og der er heller ikke truffet retlige eller administrative foranstaltninger for de 8 notfartøjer som krævet i IOTC-resolution 12/13 [18].
As explained in recital 41, following the adoption of the Decision of 15 November 2012, Sri Lanka did not put in place a deterrent sanctioning system for the segment of large vessels in its fleet.
Også for så vidt angår 2014 og IOTC-resolution 06/03 [19] har Sri Lanka ikke udstyret sine fartøjer med en samlet længde på over 15 meter med FOS og heller ikke bygget et FOC, og endelig er den obligatoriske statusrapport om FOS heller ikke blevet indsendt.
The current catalogue of sanctions is not in line with Article 19(2) of the UNFSA which stipulates, inter alia, that sanctions should be adequate in severity and deprive offenders of the benefits accruing from their illegal activities.
Hvad angår IOTC-resolution 10/02 om de obligatoriske statistikkrav, levede oplysningerne fra Sri Lanka om fangster, indsats og størrelsesfrekvens ikke op til den standard, der kræves i henhold til resolutionen.
Available evidence still confirms that Sri Lanka has not fulfilled its obligations under international law with respect to effective enforcement measures.
Hvad angår IOTC-resolution 13/06 [20] og 12/04 [21], har Sri Lanka hverken gennemført forbuddet om hvidtippet haj eller opfyldt forpligtelserne for notfartøjer til at have ketsjere om bord og for langlinefartøjerne til at have linekappeanordninger og redskaber til at fjerne kroge.
In this respect, as explained in recitals 36 to 38 the continued existence of vessels fishing in breach of conservation and management measures of the IOTC highlights Sri Lanka's failure to honour its responsibilities vis-à-vis its vessels operating on the high seas as set out in Article 18(1) and (2) of the UNFSA.
Hvad angår resolution 11/04 [22], har Sri Lanka heller ikke i 2014 indført observatørordningen som krævet.
As highlighted in recital 309 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, the level of development of Sri Lanka cannot be considered as a factor undermining the capacity of the competent authorities to cooperate with other countries and pursue enforcement actions.
Sri Lanka har navnlig ikke oprettet observatørordningen for de obligatoriske 5 % til søs for fartøjer med en længde på over 24 meter og overholder derfor ikke rapporteringsforpligtelsen for observatører.
The evaluation of the specific constraints on the development is further described in recitals 65 to 67.
Hvad angår IOTC-resolution 10/10 [23], har Sri Lanka ikke indsendt rapporten om import, landing og omladning af tun og tunlignende fisk i havnene.
Consequently, the actions taken by Sri Lanka in light of its duties as flag State are insufficient to comply with Articles 94(2)(b) of the UNCLOS and Article 18 and 19 of the UNFSA.
Det forhold, at Sri Lanka hverken indsendte de krævede oplysninger til IOTC eller opfyldte IOTC-forpligtelserne som omhandlet i betragtning 56 og 58 viser, at landet ikke har været i stand til at opfylde sine forpligtelser som flagstat, der er fastsat i UNCLOS og UNFSA.
In view of recitals 302 to 311 of the Decision of 15 November 2012 and the developments after 15 November 2012, the Commission takes the view, pursuant to Article 31(3) and 31(5)(b), (c) and (d) of the IUU Regulation, that Sri Lanka has failed to discharge the duties incumbent upon it under international law as flag State in respect of cooperation and enforcement efforts.
Navnlig den manglende rettidige indsendelse af oplysninger om statistikker, FOS, fangster, indsats, omladning i havne og observatørprogrammer underminerer Sri Lankas evne til at opfylde sine forpligtelser i henhold til artikel 117 og 118 i UNCLOS.
Failure to implement international rules (Article 31(6) of the IUU Regulation)
Disse artikler fastsætter en stats forpligtelse til at vedtage foranstaltninger for deres statsborgere til bevarelse af levende ressourcer på det åbne hav og samarbejde om bevarelses- og forvaltningsforanstaltninger for levende ressourcer på det åbne hav.
As described in recitals 314 to 334 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, the Commission analysed any information deemed relevant with respect to Sri Lanka's status as Contracting Party to the IOTC.
Som omhandlet i betragtning 322 i afgørelsen af 15. november 2012 blev der påvist en række forhold under Kommissionens besøg i Sri Lanka i 2010, navnlig med hensyn til det manglende FOS og den manglende lovgivning om indberetning af fangster.
The Commission has therefore analysed any information deemed relevant with respect to Sri Lanka's agreement to apply conservation and management measures adopted by the IOTC following the Decision of 15 November 2012.
Andre bekymrende forhold, f.eks. den manglende ordning for observatører og den ringe indberetning om fartøjer og statsborgere, der har deltaget i IUU-fiskeri, blev understreget i betragtning 319 og 321 i afgørelsen af 15. november 2012 som følge af IOTC-rapporterne om overholdelse for 2011 og 2012.
It is recalled that since the Decision of 15 November 2012, the IOTC issued annual Compliance Reports for respectively 2013 [8] and 2014 [9], which show that Sri Lanka is still not compliant or only partially compliant in the years 2012 and 2013.
De oplysninger, der i den forbindelse blev indsendt af Sri Lankas myndigheder om lovgivning om fiskeri på det åbne hav, etablering af et fungerende FOS, en pålidelig observatørordning og fangstregistrering- og indberetning viste, at myndighederne ikke har sikret effektfuld og effektiv kontrol og overvågning af fartøjer, der fører Sri Lankas flag, i overensstemmelse med de internationale forpligtelser.
With respect to the Compliance Report for 2013, Sri Lanka failed to submit some of the information required on statistics and on some conservation and management measures.
Hvad angår den regionale observatørordning, afslørede Sri Lankas myndigheder, at en stor del af flåden på trods af udvælgelse og ansættelse af visse inspektører ikke vil være dækket på grund af det begrænsede antal inspektører (45) i forhold til det store antal fartøjer (1758 i IOTC-registeret over fartøjer).
In particular, as regards the IOTC Resolution 10/08 [10] for the list of active vessels, Sri Lanka did not provide information on the international radio call sign for each vessel.
Sri Lanka har imidlertid ikke fremlagt forslag til at afhjælpe dette alvorlige problem inden for rammerne af IOTC, hvilket betyder at der ikke findes en tilstrækkelig dækning af fartøjer, der fører Sri Lankas flag, og som driver fiskeri på åbent hav, fordi inspektionsforanstaltningerne er utilstrækkelige.
As regards the IOTC Resolution 06/03 [11] on the adoption of a vessel monitoring systems (VMS), Sri Lanka failed to equip its vessels above 15 meters in overall length with VMS and to construct a Fisheries Monitoring Centre (FMC).
Der mindes i denne forbindelse om, at Sri Lanka har store problemer med at indberette data til IOTC, hvilket svækker landets kapacitet til at varetage sine forpligtelser som flagstat.
Nor has Sri Lanka submitted the mandatory VMS progress report.
For så vidt angår FOS erindrer Kommissionen som omhandlet i betragtning 316, 321 og 322 i afgørelsen af 15. november 2012 og betragtning 60 i nærværende afgørelse om de mange forskellige problemer, som IOTC har påpeget.
Regarding the IOTC Resolution 10/02 [12] on the mandatory statistical requirements, Sri Lanka has not reported the size frequency data for coastal fisheries and has not reported nominal catch, catch and effort data and size frequency at the standard required by that Resolution for the coastal fisheries, surface fisheries and longline fishery.
Efter afgørelsen af 15. november 2012 erklærede Sri Lanka, at landet var i færd med at indføre FOS.
As regards the IOTC Resolution 05/05 [13] on the submission of data regarding sharks, Sri Lanka is only partly compliant, as catch data for gillnet and longline are reported combined.As regards the IOTC Resolution 12/05 [14] on transhipments in port, Sri Lanka has not provided the mandatory report.As regards the IOTC Resolution 11/04 on the observers [15], Sri Lanka has not implemented the regional observer scheme as required by this Resolution.
Det fremlagde lovgivning for Kommissionen, hvoraf det fremgik, at der var fra 1. november 2011 var indført et krav til fartøjerne om at have en transponder om bord, og de oplyste, at der allerede var udvalgt en tjenesteudbyder.
In particular, Sri Lanka has not established the observer scheme for the mandatory 5 % at sea for the vessels longer than 24 m and is not in compliance with the observer reporting obligation.
Finansieringen var imidlertid ikke på plads, og der har været forhandlinger i gang mellem Sri Lankas myndigheder og en finansiel institution i mere end 18 måneder.
With respect to the Compliance Report for 2014, Sri Lanka did not submit some required information on statistics, nor on some conservation and management measures.
Forhandlingerne vedrører vilkårene og betingelserne for et lån til køb og etablering af et FOC og finansiel bistand til erhvervsdrivende til installering og drift inden for en rimelig frist af et FOS for hele højsøflåden.
In particular, as regards the IOTC Resolution 13/02 [16], Sri Lanka has not adopted legislation making gear marking mandatory.
Som følge heraf råder Sri Lanka ikke over et FOC.
Regarding IOTC Resolution 13/08 [17], Sri Lanka has not submitted a Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) management plan, nor have any legal and administrative measures been taken for the 8 purse seiners as required under IOTC Resolution 12/13 [18].
Kommissionen konstaterede under sit besøg i januar 2014 — således som det også er blevet bekræftet ved senere meddelelser og IOTC's rapporter om overholdelse for 2013 og 2014 — at Sri Lankas fiskerfartøjer stadig ikke er udstyret med FOS.
Also repeated in 2014, as regards the Resolution 11/04 [22], Sri Lanka has not implemented the observer scheme as required.In particular, Sri Lanka has not established the observer scheme for the mandatory 5 % at sea for the vessels longer than 24 meters and is not in compliance with the observer reporting obligation.
Hvad angår opfyldelse af IOTC's FOS-krav, er der uoverensstemmelse mellem IOTC's rapporter om overholdelse for 2013 og 2014 og Sri Lankas forholdsregler.
Regarding IOTC Resolution 10/10 [23], Sri Lanka has not provided the report on import, landing, transhipment of tuna and tuna-like fish products in ports.
Ifølge rapporterne om overholdelse er der tale om delvis overholdelse, mens de oplysninger, der er indsendt af Sri Lanka, tydeligt viser, at der ikke er sket nogen egentlig etablering af et FOS.
Sri Lanka's failure to provide the IOTC with the required information and to fulfil the IOTC obligations as referred to in recitals 56 and 58 demonstrates its failure to fulfil its obligations as flag State laid down in the UNCLOS and the UNFSA.
På baggrund af de oplysninger, der er indhentet om Sri Lankas myndigheders kontrol- og overvågningskapacitet, især om kapaciteten til at forvalte flåden og udviklingen og etableringen af et fungerende FOS, kan det konstateres, at Sri Lanka ikke opfylder kravene i UNFSA's artikel 18, stk. 3, litra g).
In particular, the failure to provide timely information on statistics, VMS, catch and effort, transhipment in port, observer programme undermines Sri Lanka's ability to fulfil its obligations under Articles 117 and 118 of the UNCLOS.
De forhold, der er omhandlet i afsnit 3.3 viser, at Sri Lanka overtræder artikel 18, stk. 3, i UNFSA.
Those articles stipulate a State's duties to adopt measures for their nationals for the conservation of living resources of the high seas and to cooperate on conservation and management measures for living resources in the areas of the high seas.
I betragtning af Sri Lankas forpligtelser som flagstat har landet derfor ikke i tilstrækkelig grad efterlevet artikel 117 og 118 i UNCLOS og artikel 18, stk. 3 i UNFSA.
As described in recital 322 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, a number of elements were revealed during the Commission's visit to Sri Lanka in November 2010, in particular regarding the lack of VMS and the lack of legislation for catch reporting.
I lyset af betragtning 314 til 334 i afgørelsen af 15. november 2012 og udviklingen efter nævnte dato finder Kommissionen med henvisning til IUU-forordningens artikel 31, stk. 3 og 6, ikke, at Sri Lanka har opfyldt sine forpligtelser i henhold til international ret, når det gælder overholdelsen af internationale regler og bevarelses- og forvaltningsforanstaltninger.
Other elements of concern, such as lack of observer scheme and the poor reporting on vessels and nationals identified as involved in IUU fishing were highlighted in recitals 319 and 321 of the Decision of 15 November 2012 as a result of the IOTC Compliance Reports for 2011 and 2012.In that regard, the information submitted by the Sri Lankan authorities in relation to the high seas fishing legislation, creation of a functional VMS, a reliable observer scheme and catch registration and reporting revealed that the authorities have not ensured effective and efficient control and monitoring of the Sri Lankan flagged vessels in line with international obligations.
Specifikke begrænsninger i udviklingslande
In particular as indicated in recitals 36, 40 and 41, Sri Lanka was invited to develop a thorough legal framework for allowing fishing in high seas accompanied by high seas fishing licences and the fulfilment of the IOTC resolutions, in particular with respect to monitoring, control and surveillance of its own fleet, including a VMS, logbook and catch reporting system and an observer scheme.With regards to the high seas fishing legislation, the Fisheries Act was amended to allow for fishing in the high seas and the implementing regulation for issuance licence was drafted and finally adopted in September 2014.
Det skal erindres, at Sri Lanka i henhold til De Forenede Nationers indeks over menneskelig udvikling [24] anses for at være et land med et mellemhøjt niveau af menneskelig udvikling (nr. 92 ud af 186 lande).
However, as the implementing regulation was only adopted in September 2014 and no information exists on how it would be implemented, only administrative licences are being issued while Sri Lankan vessels operate with no VMS.
Dette bekræftes også af bilag II til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1905/2006 [25], hvor Sri Lanka står opført i kategorien for mellemindkomstlande i nederste halvdel.
As for the regional observer scheme, the documents provided by Sri Lankan authorities revealed that despite the selection and recruitment of some inspectors, a large part of the fleet will not be covered due to the small number of inspectors (45) compared to the large number of the vessels (1758 in IOTC register of vessels).
Der er som nævnt i betragtning 337 i afgørelsen af 15. november 2012 ikke fundet belæg for, at Sri Lankas manglende opfyldelse af sine internationale retlige forpligtelser skyldes manglende udvikling.
Sri Lanka has nevertheless not made any proposals to address this serious problem in the context of the IOTC which means that there is no proper coverage of the Sri Lankan flagged fleet operating in the high seas because of inadequate means of inspection.In that respect, it is also recalled that Sri Lanka has serious problems in reporting data to the IOTC which undermines the country's capacity to exercise its obligations as flag State.
Der er heller ikke efter den 15. november 2012 fremlagt yderligere konkret dokumentation for, at de konstaterede mangler er en følge af manglende kapacitet og administrativ infrastruktur.
In relation to the VMS, as described in recitals 316, 321 and 322 of the Decision of 15 November 2012 and recital 60 of this Decision, the Commission recalls various problems highlighted by the IOTC.
Under hensyn til betragtning 336 og 337 i afgørelsen af 15. november 2012 og udviklingen efter nævnte dato finder Kommissionen med henvisning til IUU-forordningens artikel 31, stk. 7, ikke, at Sri Lankas udviklingsstatus og overordnede forvaltning af fiskeriet er påvirket af dets udviklingsniveau.
Following the Decision of 15 November 2012, Sri Lanka stated that it was in the process of introducing VMS.
KONKLUSIONER OM IDENTIFIKATION AF ET IKKESAMARBEJDENDE TREDJELAND
It submitted to the Commission the legislation demonstrating the requirement of a transponder on board as of 1 November 2011 and indicated that a service provider had already been selected.
På baggrund af ovenstående konklusioner om Sri Lankas manglende opfyldelse af de forpligtelser, der påhviler landet i henhold til international ret som flag-, havne-, kyst- eller afsætningsstat, til at træffe foranstaltninger til at forebygge, afværge og standse IUU-fiskeri bør dette land i henhold til IUU-forordningens artikel 31 identificeres som et land som Kommissionen betragter som et ikkesamarbejdende tredjeland, når det gælder bekæmpelsen af IUU-fiskeriet.
However, the funding was not in place and negotiations between the Sri Lankan authorities and the relevant financial institution have been on-going for more than 18 months.
Medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder skal i henhold til IUU-forordningens artikel 18, stk. 1, litra g), afvise import til EU af fiskevarer, uden at de behøver at anmode om yderligere dokumentation eller sende en anmodning om bistand til flagstaten, hvis de opdager, at fangstattesten er valideret af myndighederne i en flagstat, der er identificeret som en ikkesamarbejdende stat i henhold til artikel 31 i nævnte forordning.
The negotiations concern the terms and conditions of a loan to purchase and install an FMC and provide financial assistance to operators to install and operate within a reasonable time period VMS for the entire high seas fleet.
Der bør i videst muligt omfang gradvist tages højde for de negative konsekvenser for handelen i perioden mellem ikrafttrædelsen af nærværende gennemførelsesafgørelse og de eventuelle foranstaltninger, der træffes af Rådet, for at lette parternes tilpasning til den nye situation og give de erhvervsdrivende passende tid til at tilpasse sig på grund af de særlige karakteristika for fiskevarerne fra Sri Lanka og for Sri Lankas forsyningsvirksomheder, bl.a. de små og mellemstore virksomheder.
As a result, Sri Lanka does not have an FMC.
Anvendelsen af denne afgørelse bør derfor udskydes i tre måneder.
In addition, the VMS is still under development and has never become operational.
En sådan udskydelse bør ikke få indflydelse på behovet for, at Rådet hurtigt træffer foranstaltninger for at afhjælpe situationen i Sri Lanka for så vidt angår IUU-fiskeri.
The Commission established during its visit in January 2014, as confirmed by Sri Lanka's subsequent submissions and the IOTC Compliance Reports 2013 and 2014, that Sri Lankan fishing vessels are still not fitted with VMS.
Det skal bemærkes, at identifikationen i denne afgørelse af Sri Lanka som et land, som Kommissionen betragter som ikkesamarbejdende, ikke udelukker, at Kommissionen eller Rådet senere kan træffe foranstaltninger til at oprette en liste over ikkesamarbejdende tredjelande.
As for compliance with the IOTC's VMS requirements, there are discrepancies between the IOTC Compliance Reports for 2013 and 2014 and Sri Lanka's actions.