natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Undersøgelsen bekræftede, at 27 EU-producenter fremstillede samme vare i Unionen i UP.
The investigation confirmed that 27 Union producers were manufacturing the like product in the Union during the IP.
Påstanden afvises derfor, og betragtning 63 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes.
The claim is therefore rejected and recital 63 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 64-67 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of comments, recitals 64 to 67 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Nogle brugere hævdede, at skadeanalysen burde have set bort fra data for 2009, fordi finanskrisen, der indtraf det år, havde forvridende virkninger navnlig på EU-forbruget.
Some users claimed that the injury analysis should have disregarded the data relating to 2009 because the financial crisis which occurred that year had distorting effects, in particular on Union consumption.
Desuden blev de negative virkninger af finanskrisen anerkendt i betragtning 68 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Moreover, the negative effects of the financial crisis are recognised in recital 68 of the provisional Regulation.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 68 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In absence of other comments, recital 68 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Dumpingmargenen for den eksporterende producent, Macro Bars and Wires, ligger under bagatelgrænsen, jf. grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 3.
The dumping margin established for the exporting producer, Macro Bars and Wires, is below the de minimis threshold provided for in Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation.
Det kan derfor antages, at denne eksporterende producent ikke har foretaget dumping som omhandlet i grundforordningens artikel 1, stk. 2, i undersøgelsesperioden.
Therefore, it is deemed that this exporting producer has not dumped within the meaning of Article 1(2) of the basic Regulation during the investigation period.
Som følge heraf blev importmængderne udelukket fra den midlertidigt fastsatte mængde af dumpingimport fra det berørte land.
As a result, its import volumes were excluded from the volume of provisionally established dumped imports from the country concerned.
En anden eksporterende producent, nemlig Venus-gruppen, gjorde gældende, at visse transaktioner fejlagtigt blev talt med to gange.
Another exporting producer, namely the Venus group, submitted that certain transactions were mistakenly double-counted.
Kommissionen var enig med den eksporterende producent og justerede den samlede dumpingimportmængde ved at fjerne disse transaktioner.
The Commission agreed with the exporting producer, and adjusted the total volume of dumped imports by eliminating these transactions.
Følgelig blev mængden, markedsandelen og den gennemsnitlige pris på dumpingimporten revideret.
Accordingly the volume, market share and average price of the dumped imports were revised.
Dumpingimportens omfang og markedsandel:
Volume and market share of the dumped imports:
Kilde: Eurostat og spørgeskemabesvarelser
Source: Eurostat and questionnaire replies
Macro Bars and Wires eksporterede begrænsede mængder af den pågældende vare i undersøgelsesperioden, og Venus-gruppens transaktioner nævnt ovenfor udgjorde også begrænsede mængder, følgelig medfører fradraget af disse importmængder fra den samlede mængde af dumpingimport fra det berørte land ikke væsentlige ændringer i de tendenser, der er beskrevet i betragtning 69 og 71 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Macro Bars and Wires exported limited quantities of the product concerned during the IP and the transactions of the Venus group mentioned above also constituted limited quantities. Therefore the deduction of these import volumes from the total volume of dumped imports from the country concerned does not result in significant changes concerning the trends described in recitals 69 and 71 of the provisional Regulation.
Derfor blev disse betragtninger i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftet.
Thus these recitals to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Gennemsnitspriserne på dumpingimporten:
Average price of the dumped imports:
Justeringen af dumpingimportmængden medfører ingen væsentlige ændringer i gennemsnitspriserne på den indiske dumpingimport eller beregningerne af underbudsmargenen.
The adjustment of the volume of dumped imports does not result in any significant change of the average prices of the dumped Indian imports or the undercutting margin calculations.
Den vejede gennemsnitlige underbudsmargen er på 15 %, hvilket bekræfter konklusionerne i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The weighted average undercutting margin is 15 %, which confirms the finding in the provisional Regulation.
En eksporterende producent fra Indien påstod, at EU-salgspriserne forekom højst usandsynlige og sandsynligvis var fordrejede.
An Indian exporting producer claimed that the Union sales prices seemed highly implausible and likely to be distorted.
Det skal dog understreges, at de priser, der anvendtes til underbudsberegningen blev indsamlet og efterprøvet under kontrolbesøg hos EU-producenterne i stikprøven.
It is, however, underlined that the prices used in the undercutting calculations were the result of information collected and verified during on-the-spot investigations at the premises of the sampled Union producers.
Konklusionerne i forbindelse med undersøgelsesresultaterne i betragtning 75-77 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes hermed.
The conclusions drawn from the findings described in recitals 75 to 77 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Visse parter hævdede, at EU-erhvervsgrenens resultater burde betragtes som relativt positive i forbindelse med den globale økonomiske krise, og at med undtagelse af en skadesindikator, nemlig markedsandelen, tydede ingen af de øvrige indikatorer på, at der forekom skade.
Some parties claimed that the results obtained by the Union industry should be considered as reasonably positive in the context of the global economic crisis and that, with the exception of one injury indicator, namely market share, all other indicators did not point toward the existence of injury.
I den forbindelse skal det bemærkes, at ved begyndelsen af den betragtede periode, dvs. i 2009, solgte EU-erhvervsgrenen til priser under produktionsomkostningerne og var først i stand til at sælge over produktionsomkostningerne fra 2011 og fremefter.
In this respect it needs to be noted that at the beginning of the period considered, namely in 2009, the Union industry was selling below cost of production, and only managed to sell above cost of production from 2011 onwards.
Det fremgik af undersøgelsen, at selv om nogle skadesindikatorer, f.eks. produktionsmængde og kapacitetsudnyttelse, fulgte en positiv tendens, eller forblev stabile, f.eks. beskæftigelse, fulgte en række andre indikatorer for EU-erhvervsgrenens økonomiske situation, f.eks. rentabilitet, likviditet, investering og investeringsafkast, ikke en tilfredsstillende tendens i den betragtede periode.
The investigation showed that although some injury indicators such as production volumes and capacity utilisation followed a positive trend, or remained stable such as employment, a number of other indicators relating to the financial situation of the Union industry, namely profitability, cash flow, investment and return on investment did not follow a satisfactory trend during the period considered.
På samme måde forbedredes indikatorerne for rentabilitet og likviditet indtil 2011, og de begyndte igen at blive dårligere i UP.
Similarly indicators relating to profitability and cash flow improved until 2011 and they started again to deteriorate in the IP.
Det kan derfor konkluderes, at EU-erhvervsgrenen begyndte at genrejse sig efter 2009, men dens genrejsning blev efterfølgende bremset på grund af dumpingimporten fra det berørte land.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the Union industry started to improve after 2009, but its recovery was slowed down by the dumped imports from the country concerned subsequently.
Efter anmodning fra en interesseret part bekræftes det, at lagerbeholdningerne, der var blevet fastslået i betragtning 100 i forordningen om midlertidig told, vedrørte de stikprøveudvalgte EU-virksomheders aktivitet.
On a request by an interested party it is confirmed that the stock levels established in recital 100 of the provisional Regulation concerned the activity of the sampled Union companies.
EU-erhvervsgrenen hævdede, at målfortjenstmargenen på 5 %, der var blevet fastsat i den foreløbige fase, var for lav.
The Union industry argued that the target profit margin of 5 % set at the provisional stage was too low.
I betragtning 95 i forordningen om midlertidig told forklares baggrunden for valget af denne fortjenstmargen, og undersøgelsen afslørede ikke andre grunde til at ændre den.
Recital 95 of the provisional Regulation explains the reasons behind the choice of this profit margin and the investigation did not reveal any other reasons to change it.
Målfortjenesten på 5 % blev derfor opretholdt med henblik på de endelige konklusioner.
Therefore, the target profit of 5 % is maintained for the purpose of the definitive findings.
En eksporterende producent påstod, at EU-erhvervsgrenens vanskeligheder i vidt omfang skyldes strukturelle problemer, og at målfortjenstmargenen på 5 % derfor var urealistisk.
One exporting producer argued that the Union industry’s difficulties are largely due to structural problems and that, therefore, the target profit margin of 5 % was unrealistic.
Der mindes om, at ifølge retspraksis [8] har institutionerne behov for at fastsætte en fortjenstmargen, som EU-erhvervsgrenen med rimelighed kunne forventes at have under normale konkurrencevilkår i en situation uden subsidieret import.
It is recalled that according to the case law [8], the Institutions need to establish the profit margin which the Union industry could reasonably count on under normal conditions of competition, in the absence of the dumped imports.
I klagen blev det gjort gældende, og det fremgik af undersøgelsen, at dumpingimporten begyndte at komme til EU-markedet fra 2007, da importmængden steg fra 17727 ton i 2006 til 24811 ton.
The complaint argued, and the investigation established, that dumped imports started to arrive on the Union market as of 2007, when the volume of imports increased from 17727 tonnes in 2006 to 24811 tonnes.
Det var derfor ikke muligt at fastlægge en målfortjenstmargen ud fra den fortjeneste, der med rimelighed kunne forventes af EU-producenterne af samme vare.
Therefore, it was not possible to establish the target profit margin based on the profit which could reasonably be counted on by the Union producers of the like product.
Kommissionen konkluderede derfor, jf. artikel 95 i forordningen om midlertidig told, at det ikke var hensigtsmæssigt at anvende målfortjenesten på 5 % ud fra den reelle fortjeneste i andre dele af stålindustrien, som ikke har lidt under dumpingimport og subsidieret import, således som det er sket i andre nylige undersøgelse om lignende varer i samme sektor [9].
Consequently, as explained in recital 95 of the provisional Regulation, the Commission considered it appropriate using the profit margin of 5 % on the basis of the real profits observed in other parts of the steel industry, which have not suffered from dumped and subsidized imports, as has been done in other recent investigations into similar product in the same sector.
Det skal desuden bemærkes, at fortjenstmargenen på 3,7 % i 2007 i mange tilfælde også betragtes som for lav på grund af den stigende tilstedeværelse af dumpingimport.
Additionally, it should be noted that the 3,7 % profit margin observed in 2007 is considered in any case too low because of the presence and increase of dumped imports.
Kommissionen konkluderer derfor, at erhvervsgrenen har lidt væsentlig skade, jf. grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 5.
The Commission therefore concludes that the Union industry has suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 78-105 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of other comments, recitals 78 to 105 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Dumpingimportens virkninger
Effect of dumped imports
Som reaktion på disse argumenter skal det bemærkes, at undersøgelsen viste, at markedsandelen for den indiske dumpingimport steg i et hurtigere tempo end forbruget på EU-markedet.
In response to these arguments it needs to be noted that the investigation revealed the market share of the dumped Indian imports grew with a higher pace than the consumption in the Union market.
Mængden af den indiske dumpingimport steg med 110 %, mens forbruget steg med 50 % i samme periode.
The volume of Indian dumped imports increased by 110 % while the consumption increased by 50 % over the same period.
Det fremgik også af undersøgelsen, at de gennemsnitlige indiske priser konstant var lavere end EU-erhvervsgrenens gennemsnitlige pris i samme periode, at de underbød EU-erhvervsgrenens gennemsnitlige pris med 15 % i undersøgelsesperioden.
Furthermore the investigation also showed that the average Indian price was constantly below the average price of the Union industry during the same period and undercut the Union industry average price by 15 % during the IP.
Følgelig kunne EU-erhvervsgrenen, som faktisk til en vis grad nød godt af det øgede forbrug og også kunne øge sin salgsmængde med 40 %, ikke bevare sin markedsandel, som det kunne forventes med markedsvilkår, der var under forbedring, og i betragtning af EU-erhvervsgrenens ledige produktionskapacitet.
As a result, while the Union industry indeed benefited from the increased consumption to a certain extent and it also could increase its sales volumes by 40 %, it could not maintain its market share as it could be expected under improving market conditions and given the Union industry’s free production capacity.
I den betragtede periode var udviklingen i den ikke-dumpede import og de ikke-dumpede priser sammenligneligt med udviklingen i dumpingimporten og -priserne.
Over the period considered, the development of non-dumped imports and prices is comparable to the evolution of dumped imports and prices.
Desuden var priserne på dumpingimporten på stort set samme niveau som priserne på den ikke-dumpede import, idet de gennemsnitlige ikke-dumpede priser var 0,4 % lavere.
Moreover, prices of dumped imports were fundamentally at the same level as the prices of the non-dumped imports, in that average non-dumped import prices were lower by 0,4 %.
Derudover udgør mængden af ikke-dumpet import mindre end 6 % af den samlede import fra det berørte land og kun lidt over 1 % af markedsandelen.
In addition, the volume of non-dumped imports is less than six per cent of total imports from the country concerned and slightly more than one percent of market share.
Derfor konkluderede Kommissionen, at den skade, der er forårsaget af den ikke-dumpede import fra det berørte land, ikke bryder årsagssammenhængen mellem dumpingimporten fra det berørte land og den væsentlige skade, der er påført EU-erhvervsgrenen i UP.
Therefore, the Commission considers that the injury caused by non-dumped imports from the country concerned does not break the causal link between the dumped imports from the country concerned and the material injury suffered by the Union industry during the IP.
To indiske eksporterende producenter og de indiske myndigheder fastholdt deres påstand om, at importen af tråd af rustfrit stål fra Folkerepublikken Kina (»Kina«) burde have været omfattet af undersøgelsen, og at indvirkningen af importen fra Kina på EU-markedet og EU-erhvervsgrenen var undervurderet.
Two Indian exporting producers and the Government of India reiterated the claim that imports of stainless steel wire originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘China’) should have been included in the investigation and that the impact the imports from China had on the Union market and the Union industry was underestimated.
Importen fra Kina udviste dog en stigende tendens i den betragtede periode og nåede en markedsandel på 8,3 % i UP, jf. betragtning 113 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
However, the imports from China showed an increasing trend during the period considered and reached a market share of 8,3 % in the IP as stated in recital 113 of the provisional Regulation.
Det blev derfor også undersøgt, om importen fra Folkerepublikken Kina kunne have bidraget til den skade, EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt, og om den har brudt årsagssammenhængen mellem skaden og den indiske dumpingimport.
It was, therefore, further investigated whether the imports from People’s Republic of Chinacould have contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry and broken the causal link between that injury and the Indian dumped imports.
De foreliggende oplysninger i den midlertidige fase tydede på, at varesammensætningen for den kinesiske import var forskellig, og at de områder, hvor der fandtes kinesiske produkter, var forskellige i forhold til de varer, som EU-erhvervsgrenen solgte, eller endog i forhold til de indiske varer, der blev solgt på EU-markedet.
The information available at provisional stage suggested that the product mix represented by the Chinese imports was different and that the ranges where the Chinese products were present were different compared to the products sold by the Union industry or even those of Indian origin products sold in the Union market.
Efter offentliggørelsen af de midlertidige foranstaltninger modtog Kommissionen flere påstande om, at den kinesiske lavprisimport i UP muligvis brød årsagssammenhængen mellem den dumpede indiske import og den væsentlige skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt.
After publication of the provisional measure the Commission received several claims pointing to the possibility that Chinese low-priced imports during the IP would break the causal link between dumped Indian imports and material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Dette forklarer til dels, hvorfor de kinesiske priser i gennemsnit er lavere end EU-erhvervsgrenens og de indiske eksporterende producenters priser.
This partly explains why Chinese prices on average are lower than those of the Union industry and the Indian exporting producers’.
Statistikkerne for KN-kode 72230099 viste også, at de kinesiske producenters kunder var koncentreret i Det Forenede Kongerige, hvor EU-erhvervsgrenen grundlæggende ikke producerede.
The statistics for CN code 72230099 also showed that the customers of the Chinese producers were concentrated in the United Kingdomwhere the Union industry was basically not producing.
Gennemsnitspris (EUR pr. MT)
Average price (EUR/MT)
Hvad angår KN-kode 72230019 fremgik det af analyserne ud fra PCN, at både EU-erhvervsgrenen og de indiske producenter især konkurrerede i den øverste ende af markedet, hvor priserne kunne være op til fire gange højere end priserne i den laveste ende under samme KN-kode.
As concern CN code 72230019 the analyses carried out on PCN basis showed that both the Union industry and Indian producers were mainly competing in the higher end of the market where prices could be up to four times higher than prices in the lower end within the same CN [10].
For så vidt angår prisniveauet for importen fra Folkerepublikken Kina skal det bemærkes, at fra 2009 til UP lå gennemsnitsprisen for den kinesiske import over prisen på dumpingeksporten af den pågældende vare fra Indien, som det fremgår af følgende tabel, der viser den gennemsnitlige pris på den kinesiske eksport, der henhører under KN-kode 72230019.
As concerns the price level of imports from the People’s Republic of China, it needs to be pointed out that from 2009 until the IP the average price of Chinese imports remained above the price of the dumped exports of the product concerned from India, as can be seen from the following table showing the average price of Chinese exports falling under CN code 72230019.
I undersøgelsesperioden faldt de gennemsnitlige kinesiske importpriser for første gang til under den indiske dumpingimportpris.
In the IP for the first time the average Chinese import price dropped below that of the Indian import price of dumped imports.
Desuden viste sammenligningen mellem importmængden fra det berørte land og importmængden fra Folkerepublikken Kina, at på et hvilket som helst tidspunkt i den betragtede periode og navnlig i undersøgelsesperioden var importen fra Folkerepublikken Kina på et meget lavere niveau end importen fra Indien.
Furthermore, the comparison between the import volumes from the country concerned and People’s Republic of China showed that at any point during the period considered and particularly in the IP, imports from People’s Republic of China were at much lower levels than the imports from India.
Importmængderne for Folkerepublikken Kina udgjorde grundlæggende mindre end halvdelen af den samlede import fra Indien.
The import volumes for People’s Republic of China amounted to basically less than half of the total imports from India.
Selv hvis importen fra Folkerepublikken Kina derfor kunne have bidraget til EU-erhvervsgrenens skade, kunne den ikke have påvirket EU-erhvervsgrenens situation i det omfang, at den bryder årsagssammenhængen mellem dumpingimport fra det berørte land og den skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt.
Therefore, even if the imports from the People’s Republic of China contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry they could not have affected the situation of the Union industry to the extent to break the causal link between the dumped imports from the country concerned and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Derfor bekræftes betragtning 113 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Therefore, recital 113 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Konkurrence fra andre EU-producenter
Competition from other producers in the Union
En af parterne hævdede, at EU-producenternes ringe økonomiske resultater kunne være forvoldt af konkurrence fra andre EU-producenter, som ikke var klagere eller ikke havde givet udtryk for deres støtte til undersøgelsen ved sagens indledning.
One party argued that the Union producers’ poor financial performance might have been caused by competition from other Union producers which were not complainants or did not express their support to the investigation at the initiation of the case.
Markedsandelen for andre EU-producenter udviklede sig som følger:
The market share of other producers in the Union developed as follows:
Kilde: Eurostat Kilde: klagen og spørgeskemabesvarelser
Source: complaint and standing replies
Andre EU-producenters salg i EU (ton)
Union sales of other producers in the Union (MT)
Andre producenters markedsandel i Unionen
Market share of other producers in the Union
De EU-producenter, som ikke klagede, og som ikke specifikt gav udtryk for tilslutning til undersøgelsen, tegnede sig for 44 % af det samlede EU-salg som anført i betragtning 86 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The Union producers which were not complainants and which did not specifically express support to the investigation accounted for 44 % of total Union sales reported in recital 86 of the provisional Regulation.
Men denne vækst er relativt beskeden i forhold til væksten i dumpingimporten fra det berørte land i samme periode (+ 110 %).
However, such growth is relatively modest if compared to the growth of the dumped imports from the country concerned in the same period (+ 110 %).
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 121-124 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of comments, recitals 121 to 124 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 125 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of comments, recital 125 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 126-133 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of comments, recitals 126 to 133 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 142-144 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of comments, recitals 142 to 144 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.