natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Investeringerne derimod styrtdykkede i 2009 og er ikke siden kommet tilbage til det oprindelige niveau.
The investments, on the other hand, plummeted in 2009 and have not recovered since.
EU-erhvervsgrenens økonomiske situation er generelt forbedret.
Overall, the economic situation of the industry has improved.
Disse forbedringer er dog forholdsvis nye og i et vist omfang baseret på uforudsete og midlertidige markedsudviklinger ved årsskiftet 2010/2011 (jf. betragtning 155).
However, these improvements are relatively recent and to some extent based on unforeseen and temporary market developments at the break of 2010/2011 (see recital (155) above).
Dette understøttes tilsyneladende af de foreliggende oplysninger om udviklingen i EU-erhvervsgrenens margen i 2012 (jf. betragtning 179), som viser et fald i forhold til NUP.
This appears to be supported by the information available on the developments of the margin of the Union industry in 2012 (see recital (179) above) that show a decline as compared to RIP.
Ud fra ovenstående analyse er EU-erhvervsgrenens situation blevet forbedret, og erhvervsgrenen påføres tilsyneladende ikke væsentlig skade.
In view of the above analysis, the situation of the Union industry has improved and no material injury appears to be taking place.
Til trods for de tilsyneladende positive tendenser og de omfattende omstruktureringsbestræbelser er EU-erhvervsgrenens situation ikke desto mindre stadig sårbar.
Nevertheless, despite apparent positive trends and the significant restructuring efforts, the situation of the Union industry is still fragile.
Eksempelvis faldt både produktions- og salgsmængderne og markedsandelen.
For example, production and sales volumes as well as market share decreased.
Desuden var forbedringerne forholdsvis nye og tilsyneladende kortvarige med et fald i rentabiliteten i 2012.
Moreover, the improvements were relatively recent and with a fall of profitability in 2012 appeared short-lived.
På dette grundlag blev det konkluderet, at EU-erhvervsgrenen stadig befinder sig i en sårbar situation, selv om der ikke var bevis for skade i NUP.
On this basis it was considered that while no material injury proved to exist in RIP, the Union industry was still in a fragile state.
Efter fremlæggelsen af oplysninger anfægtede visse parter brugen af data vedrørende perioden efter NUP til analysen af EU-erhvervsgrenens økonomiske situation.
Following the disclosure some parties contested the use of data referring to period beyond RIP for the analysis of the economic situation of the Union industry.
Som svar på denne påstand bekræftes det, at EU-erhvervsgrenens situation blev analyseret for den betragtede periode, og at der på dette grundlag ikke blev konkluderet væsentlig skade.
In response to this claim it is confirmed that the situation of the Union industry was assessed for the period considered and on this basis no material injury was established.
Undersøgelsen har vist, at importen fra Indien fortsat var subsidieret og at der ikke var antydninger af, at subsidierne ville blive reduceret eller ophævet i fremtiden.
The investigation has shown that the imports from India continued to be subsidised and that there are no indications that the subsidisation would be reduced or discontinued in the future.
En analyse af den sandsynlige udvikling i importmængderne i Unionen fra Indien viste, at importen fra Indien på grund af den overskydende kapacitet, som kan eksporteres, (jf. betragtning 125), prisniveauet i Unionen og EU-markedets tiltrækningskraft sandsynligvis vil stige til et niveau, der ligger over niveauet for NUP, hvis foranstaltningerne ophæves.
A prospective analysis of the likely import volumes in the Union from India revealed that, given the excess capacity available for exports (see recital (125) above), the price levels in the Union and the attractiveness of the Union market, the imports from India are likely to increase to levels above those reached in the RIP, if the measures were repealed.
Med de planlagte kapacitetsudvidelser anslås den overskydende kapacitet, som kan eksporteres, til ca. 600000-700000 tons i den nærmeste fremtid, hvilket udgør ca. 21-25 % af det samlede EU-forbrug i NUP.
With the planned capacity expansions, the excess capacity available for exports is estimated to reach about 600000-700000 tonnes in the near future, which would represent around 21-25 % of the total Union consumption in RIP.
Med den fortsatte subsidiering forventes importpriserne fra Indien at falde yderligere, hvis foranstaltningerne over for Indien ophæves.
Given the continuation of subsidisation, the prices of imports from India are expected to further decrease, should the measures against India be lifted.
Eksportørerne vil desuden skulle konkurrere mod lavprisimport fra andre lande og vil derfor sandsynligvis sænke deres priser yderligere for at vinde flere markedsandele på EU-markedet.
Also, as the exporters will have to compete against low priced imports from other countries, they are likely to lower their prices further in order to increase market share on the Union market.
På dette grundlag vil EU-erhvervsgrenen sandsynligvis blive udsat for væsentlige mængder af import fra Indien til subsidierede priser, der ligger under EU-erhvervsgrenens gennemsnitspriser, og de vil underminere den seneste forbedring i EU-erhvervsgrenens økonomiske situation.
On this basis, the Union industry is likely to be exposed to substantial volumes of imports from India at subsidised prices below the average prices of the Union industry, undermining the recently improved economic situation of the latter.
Det er således sandsynligt, at der igen vil forekomme skade, hvis foranstaltningerne over for Indien ophæves.
As a result, the material injury is likely to recur should the measures against India be lifted.
Produktionskapacitet og overskydende kapacitet, der kan eksporteres
Production capacity and excess capacity available for exports
Som anført i betragtning 125 har de eksporterende producenter i Indien potentiale til at øge deres eksportmængde til EU-markedet.
As indicated above (see recital (125) above), the exporting producers in India have the potential to increase their export volumes to the Union market.
Produktionskapaciteten i Indien er vokset markant i den betragtede periode (jf. betragtning 125).
India had a significant growth in its production capacity over the period considered (see recital (125) above).
Ifølge de foreliggende oplysninger forventes Indien at øge kapaciteten yderligere, hvilket vil skabe en forskel mellem det hjemlige forbrug og den produktionskapacitet, der kan eksporteres, på 600000-700000 tons i den nærmeste fremtid.
According to the information available it is expected to increase its capacity further, creating a gap between domestic consumption and production capacity available for exports of 600000-700000 tonnes in the near future.
En sådan overskydende kapacitet til eksport må betragtes som væsentlig, da den udgør ca. 21-25 % af det nuværende EU-forbrug i NUP.
Such excess capacity available for exports has to be considered as significant as it represents around 21-25 % of the current Union consumption in RIP.
Selv om importen til Unionen var forholdsvis lav, blev den mere end fordoblet i den betragtede periode, og der er risiko for, at omfattende eksportmængder fra Indien kan omdirigeres til Unionen.
Therefore, although the imports to the Union were relatively low, they more than doubled over the period considered and there is a risk that significant exports from India could be diverted to the Union.
Tab af eksportmarkeder
Loss of export markets
Tyrkiet og Sydafrika har indført handelsbeskyttelsesforanstaltninger over for importen fra Indien.
Trade defence measures are currently in place against Indian imports in Turkey and South Africa.
Det deraf følgende mulige tab af disse eksportmarkeder for Indien er endnu en indikator for, at EU-markedet sandsynligvis vil blive målet, hvis foranstaltningerne får lov at udløbe.
The consequent possible loss of these export markets for India is another indicator that the Union market is likely to be targeted if the measures were allowed to lapse.
Efter fremlæggelsen af oplysninger anfægtede visse parter konklusionerne vedrørende Indiens tab af eksportmarkeder.
Following the disclosure some parties contested the conclusions regarding the loss of export markets for India.
Det blev påstået, at begge markeder var marginale eksportmarkeder, og at der derfor ikke kunne sendes væsentlige eksportmængder fra disse markeder til Unionen, hvis foranstaltningerne ophæves.
It was claimed that both markets were marginal export market, therefore no significant export volumes from these markets could be redirected to the Union if the measures were lifted.
Det skal bemærkes, at handelsbeskyttelsesforanstaltningerne på visse markeder udelukker enhver hensigtsmæssig sammenligning af markedernes relative betydning med og uden foranstaltninger for et givent land.
It is noted that only the existence of the trade defence on some markets excludes any meaningful comparison of the relative importance of the markets with and without measures for a given country.
Det blev i modsætning til påstanden ikke konkluderet, at eksportmængderne fra Indien på disse markeder ville blive sendt til EU-markedet.
In addition, contrary to the claim, it was not considered that the export volumes from India placed on these markets would be redirected to the Union market.
Det blev derimod konkluderet, at handelsbeskyttelsesforanstaltningerne på andre tredjelandsmarkeder begrænser disse markeders absorbtionskapacitet, hvad angår den forventede stigning i Indiens overskydende kapacitet til eksport.
Instead, it was considered that the existence of the trade defence measures on other third markets restricts the absorption capacity of third markets as regards the foreseen increase in excess capacities available for exports in India.
Tilstedeværelsen af handelsbeskyttelsesforanstaltninger i tredjelande er også en indikation af, at de indiske eksportørers prispolitik sandsynligvis også vil blive anvendt på EU-markedet.
The existence of trade defence measures in third countries is also an indication that the pricing behaviour of Indian exports is likely to replicate on the Union market.
EU-markedet for PET er attraktivt i form af størrelse og priser, da det er det tredjestørste marked på verdensplan med et strukturelt behov for import og højere priser i forhold til andre markeder.
The Union PET market is attractive in terms of its size and prices, being the third largest market in the world, with a structural need for imports and higher prices as compared to other markets.
I Indiens tilfælde er importpriserne i Unionen ofte højere end priserne til andre tredjelande, hvilket peger i retning af, at EU-markedet er attraktivt for den indiske eksport.
In the case of India, the import prices to the Union tend to be higher than the prices to other third countries, which points to the attractiveness of the Union market for the Indian exports.
Dette illustreres ved, at importen fra Indien er fordoblet i den betragtede periode til trods for de gældende foranstaltninger.
This is well illustrated by the fact that the imports from India have doubled over the period considered despite the measures in force.
EU-markedets tiltrækningskraft for eksportører bekræftes også ved, at EU-erhvervsgrenen fortsat tabte markedsandele til den stigende import fra lande uden foranstaltninger.
The attractiveness of the Union market for exporters is also confirmed by the fact that the Union industry continued to lose market share to the rising imports from the countries without measures.
Dette er især tilfældet for Sydkorea, der øgede sin eksport markant til EU-markedet i 2012, da foranstaltningerne over for Sydkorea var udløbet.
This is in particular true in the case of South Korea that significantly increased its exports to the Union market in 2012 after the measures against the country have expired.
Det blev konkluderet, at importen fra andre tredjelande med foranstaltninger ikke i væsentlig grad påvirkede EU-erhvervsgrenen, idet denne import var af begrænset omfang, og da markedsandelen for denne import faldt markant i NUP.
The impact of the imports from other third countries with measures on the situation of the Union industry was not considered significant, due to the relevant low import volumes and substantial decrease of their market share in the RIP.
Mængden af import fra andre tredjelande uden foranstaltninger steg i den betragtede periode, men de respektive gennemsnitlige importpriser lå dog fortsat tæt på EU-erhvervsgrenens gennemsnitspris.
The volume of imports from other third countries without any measures increased during the period considered, however, the respective average import price remained close to the Union industry average price.
Virkningen af importen fra disse lande på EU-erhvervsgrenens situation betragtes derfor som begrænset.
Therefore, the impact of the imports from these countries on the situation of the Union industry is considered limited.
Efter fremlæggelsen af oplysninger påstod enkelte parter, at en betydelig mængder af PET på grund af den vertikale integration mellem PET-producenter og konverteringsvirksomheder solgtes til bunden anvendelse, der ikke konkurrerede med importen.
Following the disclosure some parties claimed that due to the vertical integration between PET producers and converters, a considerable part of PET was sold for captive use that did not compete with imports.
Det blev desuden påstået, at andelen af det bundne marked var betydelig og påvirkede analyseresultaterne.
It was also claimed that share of captive market was significant, affecting the results of the analysis.
På grundlag af de oplysninger, der blev indhentet fra EU-producenterne i stikprøven, blev andelen af bundet salg ikke fundet væsentlig (under 10 %).
Based on the information collected at the level of sampled Union producers the proportion of captive sales was found not to be significant (below 10 %).
Det skal understreges, at de pågældende parter opgjorde PET-producenternes tilstedeværelse i emballagevirksomhederne i form af installeret PET-produktionskapacitet og ikke i form af deres markedsandel i emballagesektoren.
It has to be underlined that the parties in question expressed the presence of PET producers in the packaging business in terms of the installed production capacity of PET and not in terms of their market share in packaging.
Påstanden om, at den bundne anvendelse skulle udgøre en væsentlig andel, blev derfor fundet ubegrundet.
Therefore, the claim on significant proportion of captive use was found unsubstantiated.
Hvad angår prisniveauet, konstateredes det, at priserne ved salg til forretningsmæssigt forbundne parter og ikke forretningsmæssigt forbundne parter var ens.
As regards the price levels, the prices of related and unrelated sales were found to be within the same range.
På dette grundlag blev det konkluderet, at det ikke var nødvendigt at foretage en særskilt analyse af det bundne salgs indvirkning, og parternes påstande blev afvist.
On these grounds it was concluded that the distinctive analysis of the impact of captive sales was not necessary and the claims of the parties were rejected.
Visse parter påstod, at importen fra Indien ikke forvoldte skade i NUP, hvilket bevidnes af EU-erhvervsgrenens relativt gode økonomi og fortjeneste.
Some parties argued that the injury due to imports from India did not exist during the RIP as evidenced by the relative economic health and profits of the Union industry.
Det skal bemærkes, at der i denne procedure ikke er konstateret fortsat skade, og at parternes påstand derfor svarer overens med undersøgelsesresultaterne.
It has to be note that, indeed, no continuation of injury has been established in the present case, and therefore the claim of the parties corresponds to the investigation findings.
Visse parter påstod, at andre faktorer såsom EU-erhvervsgrenens strukturelle skævhed og manglende investeringer samt sæson- og konjunkturbestemte faktorer (f.eks. dårlige vejrforhold, økonomisk krise) kunne have påvirket EU-erhvervsgrenens situation.
Some parties claimed that other factors, such as structural inefficiencies of the Union industry and lack of investment as well as seasonal and conjunctural factors (e.g. bad weather, economic crises) could have an impact on the situation of the Union industry.
Vedrørende det første punkt skal det bemærkes, at EU-erhvervsgrenens omstrukturering allerede finder sted, og de opnåede effektivitetsstigninger antyder, at parternes påstand er ubegrundet.
Concerning the first point raised, it is to be noted that the restructuring of the Union industry is already taking place and the efficiency gains obtained suggest that the claim of the parties are unfounded.
Derudover påstod visse parter, at der sandsynligvis ikke vil opstå fornyet skade, hvis foranstaltningerne udløber, idet EU-erhvervsgrenen grundet sin struktur (koncentration og vertikal integration) er beskyttet mod virkningerne af importen.
Furthermore, some parties argued that the recurrence of injury in this case is unlikely if the measures were to expire, given that thanks to its structure (concentration and vertical integration) the Union industry is shielded from the effects of the imports.
Det blev endvidere påstået, at et skift til importeret PET hverken er ønsket eller muligt i den nærmeste fremtid, især da indkøbskontrakter og –politikker samt homologeringsprocessen for store indehavere af mærker (aftagerindustrier) gør det vanskeligt at skifte PET-leverandør.
Moreover, it has been argued that a shift to imported PET is neither desired nor possible in the near future, in particular as purchasing contracts and policies as well as homologation process of large brand owners (downstream users) makes changes of PET suppliers cumbersome.
Det skal bemærkes, at undersøgelsesresultaterne viste, EU-erhvervsgrenen fortsat tabte markedsandele til de importerede varer i den betragtede periode; dette viser, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke er beskyttet mod virkningen af importen, og samtidig at skiftet til import ikke er hypotetisk, men faktisk allerede finder sted.
It is to be noted that based on the findings of the investigation the Union industry continued to lose market share to the benefit of imports during the period considered; this shows, on the one hand, that the Union industry is not shielded from the effects of the imports and, on the other hand, that the switch to imports is not hypothetical but is actually already taking place.
Påstandene måtte derfor afvises.
The arguments had to be therefore dismissed.
Efter fremlæggelsen af oplysninger gentog visse parter deres påstand om, at EU-erhvervsgrenen som følge af sin struktur var beskyttet mod den potentielle konkurrence fra importen.
Following the disclosure some parties reiterated the claim that the Union industry was shielded from the potential competition of imports due to its structure.
Hvad angår påstanden om, at en af de producerende grupper på EU-markedet har en dominerende stilling og kontrollerer fem producenter, skal det indledningsvis bemærkes, at EU-markedet er et åbent marked med otte andre producenter, der opererer uden for denne gruppe, og stigende konkurrence fra importen fra tredjelande – med og uden foranstaltninger.
Firstly, as regards the claim on dominant position of one of the producing groups in the Union market controlling five producers, it is noted that the Union market is an open market with other eight producers operating outside this group and growing competition of imports from third countries – with and without any measures in place.
For det andet er koncentration normalt for denne type råvarebaserede virksomheder, der er afhængige af stordriftsfordele for at være konkurrencedygtige.
Secondly, concentration is typical for this type of business based on commodity product that relies on economies of scale for its competitiveness.
For det tredje er der ingen prisførende virksomheder på EU-markedet.
Thirdly, no price leader was found to exist on the Union market.
Endelig gentog parterne, at man ikke analyserede virkningen af importen fra de tre pågældende lande set i lyset af den vertikale integration mellem visse EU-producenter og emballagevirksomheder eller med producenter af PTA.
Finally, parties reiterated that the impact of the imports from the three countries concerned in the light of the vertical integration of some Union producers with the packaging industry or with producers of PTA was not analysed.
Som det fremgår af betragtning 205 blev disse aspekter analyseret og fundet udokumenterede.
As established in recital (205) above these aspects were indeed analysed and found unsubstantiated.
Desuden bekræftede efterprøvningen af virksomhederne ud fra en vertikal integration med råvareproducenter, at der ikke var nogen komparativ fordel, da transaktionerne foregår til markedspris.
Moreover, the verification of companies concerned by vertical integration with producers of raw materials confirmed there was no comparative advantage as the transfers were made at market price.
Ud fra ovenstående afvises påstanden om, at EU-erhvervsgrenen skulle være beskyttet mod konkurrence.
Based on the above, the claim that the Union industry would be shielded from the competition was rejected.
Endelig påstod nogle parter, at der ikke var belæg for konklusionen om, at den indiske eksportkapacitet vil blive dirigeret til EU-markedet til "billige priser", idet i) den hjemlige efterspørgsel i Indien er stigende og forventes fortsat at vokse; ii) der produceres mere PET, end der forbruges, på hjemmemarkedet, men konkurrencen på eksportmarkederne har ikke ført til eksport til unormalt lave priser; iii) stigningerne i produktionskapaciteten i Asien modsvarer stigningen i den efterspørgsel, der forventes på verdensplan.
Last, some parties argued that no elements support a conclusion that the Indian export capacity may target the Union market at 'cheap prices' given that (i) the domestic demand in India is growing and is expected to continue to grow; (ii) PET in excess of domestic consumption exists, yet competition in export markets has not resulted in exports at abnormally low prices; (iii) increases in production capacity in Asia responds to the increase in demand expected worldwide.
Det skal bemærkes, at konklusionerne i denne undersøgelse viser, at den projekterede vækst i kapaciteten viser en stigende overskydende produktionskapacitet i forhold til den hjemlige efterspørgsel.
It is to be noted that the findings in the present investigation demonstrate that the projected growth of capacity shows a growing excess of the production capacity over domestic demand.
Desuden var de indiske priser på tredjelandsmarkederne lavere end importpriserne i Unionen.
In addition, the Indian prices on third markets were lower as compared to the Indian imports prices to the Union.
Ud fra konklusionerne i betragtning 189-199 er det sandsynligt, at den subsidierede indiske import vil blive dirigeret til EU-markedet i væsentlige mængder og til priser under EU-erhvervsgrenens gennemsnitlige priser, hvis udligningsforanstaltningerne udløber.
Based on the findings described above in recitals (189) to (199) it is likely that the subsidised Indian imports will target the Union market at substantial volumes and below the average price of the Union industry should the countervailing measures be allowed to lapse.
Parternes påstande afvises derfor.
On these grounds the arguments of the parties are dismissed.
Konklusion vedrørende fornyet skade
Conclusion on the recurrence of injury
Ud fra ovenstående konkluderes det, at omfattende mængder af subsidieret import fra Indien med sandsynlighed vil blive dirigeret til Unionen, hvis udligningsforanstaltningerne ophæves.
On the basis of the foregoing it is concluded that it is likely that substantial volumes of subsidised import from India would be redirected to the Union should the countervailing measures be repealed.
Med den fortsatte subsidiering vil importpriserne højst sandsynligt underbyde EU-erhvervsgrenens priser.
Thanks to the continued subsidisation, the prices of the imports would most likely undercut the Union industry prices.