natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I mangel af nye oplysninger i denne forbindelse blev denne påstand afvist.
In the absence of any new information in this regard, this claim was rejected.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse af oplysninger påstod den kinesiske regering, at den omstændighed, at EU-erhvervsgrenens kapacitet under alle omstændigheder ikke opfyldte EU-efterspørgslen er irrelevant, da EU-erhvervsgrenens salgsmængde af moduler faldt i tråd med faldet i forbruget, og gentog, at faldet i forbruget mellem 2011 og UP var årsagen til, at EU-erhvervsgrenen blev påført væsentlig skade.
Following final disclosure, the GOC argued that the fact that the Union industry's capacity did in any event not meet the Union demand is irrelevant since the sales volume of modules of the Union industry decreased in line with the decrease in consumption and reiterated that the decrease in consumption between 2011 and the IP caused the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Selv om EU-forbruget og EU-erhvervsgrenens salgsmængde af moduler faldt i samme takt mellem 2011 og UP, skal dette ses i forhold til udviklingen i de kinesiske subsidierede priser, der underbød EU-erhvervsgrenens priser betydeligt og tvang EU-erhvervsgrenen til at sælge til tabsgivende priser.
While indeed between 2011 and the IP the Union consumption decrease and the sales volume of modules decreased with a similar trend, this has to be seen in relation to the development of the Chinese subsidised prices, significantly undercutting the Union industry prices, thus forcing the Union industry selling at losses.
Det skal i den forbindelse erindres, jf. betragtning 111 i forordningen om midlertidig antidumpingtold, at importen fra Kina enten bevarede sin markedsandel (moduler) eller øgede den (celler), mens forbruget var faldende.
In this regard it is recalled, as mentioned in recital (111) to the provisional anti-dumping Regulation that imports from the PRC either maintained their market share (modules) or increased it (cells) when the consumption was decreasing.
Flere interesserede parter har påstået, at årsagen til skaden på EU-erhvervsgrenen var nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser i medlemsstaterne.
It has been claimed by several interested parties that the cause of the injury suffered by the Union industry was linked to the reductions in the feed-in-tariffs implemented by the Member States.
Den hyppigst anvendte form for støtte til solenergi var de faste afregningspriser.
The most frequently implemented support instruments for solar energy were FITs.
Kommissionen fokuserer sin analyse på denne type støtteordninger.
The analysis of the Commission focused on this type of support scheme.
Faste afregningspriser er et finansielt instrument, som bidrager til at opnå obligatoriske nationale mål for anvendelsen af vedvarende energi, som foreskrevet i direktiv 2009/28/EF [102] om fremme af brug af energi fra vedvarende energikilder.
FITs are a financial support instrument aiming to achieve mandatory national targets for the use of renewable energy, as prescribed by the Directive 2009/28/EC [102] on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources.
Faste afregningspriser — og andre støtteordninger — er i de fleste tilfælde underlagt statsstøttekontrol i henhold til artikel 107 og 108 i TEUF, som sikrer, at elektricitetsproducenter ikke overkompenseres.
FITs, as other support schemes, are in most cases also subject to State aid control pursuant to articles 107, 108 TFEU, which ensures the absence of overcompensation for electricity producers.
Til trods for nationale forskelle kan der observeres tre fænomener, hvad angår udviklingen i de faste afregningspriser i Unionen: i) en reduktion i de faste afregningspriser, ii) ophævelse af ordningen med faste afregningspriser som helhed (Spanien) og iii) indførelse af kapacitetstærskler (»caps«) for installationer, der kan opnå støtte, og generelle tærskler for, hvor mange nye anlæg der kan modtage støtte i hver medlemsstat pr. år.
In spite of the national differences, three phenomena could be observed as regards the evolution of FITs in the Union: (i) the reduction of the FIT rates, (ii) the suspension of the FIT scheme as a whole (Spain) and (iii) the introduction of capacity thresholds (‘caps’) for the installations eligible for financing as well as overall caps on the yearly installed new supported capacity at the Member State level.
Det blev i den forbindelse konkluderet, at virkningen af udviklingen i faste afregningspriser for så vidt angår efterspørgslen efter moduler også var repræsentativ for situationen vedrørende celler.
In this regard, it was considered that the impact of the evolution of FITs with regard to the demand of modules was also representative for the situation with regard to cells.
Da celler er nødvendige elementer til at producere moduler, og da de ikke anvendes i andre produktionsprocesser, vil et fald i efterspørgslen efter moduler automatisk afføde et fald i efterspørgslen efter celler.
Indeed, as cells are indispensable for the production of modules and as they are not used in other production processes, a decrease in demand for modules triggers automatically a decrease in demand for cells.
Undersøgelsen bekræftede sammenhængen mellem udviklingen i de faste afregningspriser og forbruget, og det konkluderedes, at faldet i forbruget mellem 2011 og UP ikke brød årsagssammenhængen mellem den subsidierede import fra Kina og den væsentlige skade, der påførtes EU-erhvervsgrenen, jf. betragtning 625.
While the investigation confirmed the link between the evolution of FITs and consumption, the investigation established that the decrease in consumption between 2011 and the IP did not contribute to break the causal link between the subsidised imports from the PRC and the material injury suffered by the Union industry as described in detail in recital (625) above.
Undersøgelsen viste nemlig, at de eksporterende producenter var i stand til at opretholde deres høje markedsandele for moduler (80 %) og endda øge deres markedsandele lidt for celler (fra 20 % i 2011 til 22 % i UP), alt imens EU-erhvervsgrenens situation forværredes.
Indeed, the investigation showed that while the situation of the Union industry was deteriorating, the exporting producers were able to maintain their high market shares for modules (80 %) and even increased their market shares slightly for cells (from 20 % in 2011 to 22 % during the IP).
Det skal desuden bemærkes, at EU-erhvervsgrenens gennemsnitlige pris for moduler faldt med 53 % i den betragtede periode, hvilket især skyldes den væsentlige stigning i den subsidierede import og det heraf følgende voldsomme prispres på EU-markedet.
In addition it should be noted that the average price of modules charged by the Union industry dropped by 53 % over the period considered, mainly due to the significant increase of subsidised imports and the substantial price pressure they exerted on the Union market.
Det erkendes således, at de faste afregningspriser skabte en efterspørgsel efter solenergi, og at de nylige ophævelser (i f.eks. Spanien) og nedskæringer i andre medlemsstater reducerede forbruget af den undersøgte vare i UP, hvilket således sandsynligvis kan have bidraget til den væsentlige skade, der påførtes EU-erhvervsgrenen.
Consequently, it is acknowledged that FITs generated demand for solar energy and that recent FIT suspensions (as in Spain) and reductions in other Member States lowered the consumption for the product under investigation during the IP, thus possibly having contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Faldet i forbruget i UP var dog ikke af et sådant omfang, at det kunne bryde årsagssammenhængen mellem den subsidierede import og den skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen blev påført.
However, the decrease in consumption during the IP was not such as to break the causal link between the subsidised imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
En række parter påstod, at nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser betød, at investeringsmulighederne i solenergi ikke længere var attraktive for investorer, hvilket reducerede efterspørgslen efter den pågældende vare i Unionen.
Several parties argued that FITs cutbacks rendered the solar investment opportunities unattractive for investors and thus lowered the demand for the product concerned in the Union.
Undersøgelsen bekræftede, at der er en sammenhæng mellem de faste afregningspriser og investeringsniveauet i solenergi, men viste dog også, at investeringerne i solenergi er mindre afhængige af faste afregningspriser i regioner med høj solindstråling, hvor produktionen af solenergi er mere effektiv, og i regioner med høje elektricitetspriser.
While the investigation confirmed a link between the FIT rates and the level of investments in the solar industry, it also showed that investments in the solar energy are less dependent in regions with high sun exposure where production of solar energy is more efficient and in regions with high electricity prices.
Undersøgelsen viste nemlig, at der stadig foretages investeringer (f.eks. i Spanien) til trods for ophævelsen af støtteordningen med faste afregningspriser.
Indeed, showed that investments are still being made (e.g. in Spain) in spite of the suspension of the FIT scheme.
Undersøgelsen viste desuden, at mulighederne for at investere i solenergi stadig er attraktive selv med lave afregningspriser.
Moreover, the investigation showed that solar energy investment opportunities still remained attractive even with lower FIT rates.
På grundlag af ovenstående blev denne påstand afvist.
On the basis of the above, this claim was rejected.
En række parter hævdede, at udviklingen i de faste afregningspriser udøvede et stærkt tryk på priserne og dermed på EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet.
Several parties claimed that the FIT developments exercised a strong downward pressure on prices and therefore on the profitability of the Union industry.
En interesseret part påstod, at man kun undersøgte virkningerne af udviklingen i de faste afregningspriser for efterspørgslen, mens virkningerne for priserne også burde være blevet analyseret.
One interested party claimed that only the impact of the development of FITs on the demand was examined, while the impact on prices should also have been analysed instead.
I samme forbindelse påstod en række interesserede parter, at de fleste medlemsstater gennemførte omfattende nedskæringer allerede i 2010, hvilket pressede priserne for moduler ned.
In the same context, several interested parties argued that most of the Member States implemented major cutbacks already in 2010 thus putting a downward pressure on the prices for modules.
Hvad angår denne påstand, skal det bemærkes, at medlemsstaterne gennemførte nedskæringer på de faste afregningspriser på forskellige tidspunkter og med forskellig hastighed, og at det er vanskeligt at lave en samlet oversigt for hele Unionen.
In respect of this claim it should be noted that the Member States implemented FIT cutbacks at different moments in time and at different speeds and that drawing a general picture for the entire Union is rather difficult.
Uanset hvornår de faste afregningspriser nåede meget lave niveauer, kan det betydelige fald i EU-erhvervsgrenens priser og rentabilitet i den betragtede periode ikke udelukkende eller hovedsageligt forklares ved nedskæringer i de faste afregningspriser.
Irrespective of the moment when the FIT rates reached very low levels, the significant decrease in the Union prices and profitability during the period considered cannot be solely or mainly explained by the reduction of FITs.
På grundlag af oplysningerne om Tyskland og Italien, der tilsammen tegnede sig for ca. 75 % af EU-forbruget i 2011, var faldet i den gennemsnitlige salgspris mere udtalt end faldet i de faste afregningspriser i UP.
First, on the basis of the information collected for Germany and Italy that represented together around 75 % of the Union consumption in 2011, the drop in the average sales price was more pronounced than the decrease in the FIT rates during the IP.
Dernæst viser den indsamlede dokumentation, at EU-erhvervsgrenen i visse lande såsom Italien, selv med meget generøse faste afregningspriser, var nødt til at sænke deres priser.
Second, the evidence collected shows that, for some countries such as Italy, even in the context of very generous FIT rates, the Union industry had to decrease significantly their prices.
Endelig var EU-erhvervsgrenen i UP nødt til at sælge til priser, der lå under produktionsomkostningerne, hvilket hovedsagelig var en følge af, at de kinesiske eksporterende producenter havde 80 % af EU-forbruget og derfor styrke til at påvirke prisfastsættelsesmekanismen.
Finally, during the IP, the Union industry had to sell at prices below their cost of production, which was mainly a consequence of the fact that the Chinese exporting producers had 80 % of the Union consumption and therefore the power to influence the price-setting mechanism.
Undersøgelsen fastslog yderligere, at frem til 2011 gjorde de høje faste afregningspriser og faldet i priserne på moduler i Unionen det yderst attraktivt at investere i solenergi, idet investorerne fik meget høje afkast af deres investeringer.
The investigation further established that up to 2011 the higher FIT rates together with the decrease in the prices of modules in the Union rendered the investments in solar energy extremely attractive as investors were earning very high rates on return.
Derfor resulterede dette i et stort antal investeringer og dermed stor efterspørgsel efter solpaneler.
Therefore, this resulted in a high number of investments and consequently high demand of solar panels.
Som følge af den stigende efterspørgsel steg det i faste afregningspriser samlede udbetalte beløb betydeligt, og de fleste medlemsstater nedjusterede de eksisterende ordninger med faste afregningspriser for bl.a. at undgå en stigning i elpriserne.
As a consequence of the increased demand, the total amount of FITs paid increased significantly and most Member States revised the existing FIT schemes downwards to avoid inter alia an increase of electricity costs.
Dette viser, at nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser også kan have været et resultat af de faldende priser og ikke omvendt.
This shows that FIT cutbacks may also have been the result of the decreasing prices and not vice versa.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse af oplysninger hævdede en af parterne, at der er et modsætningsforhold mellem betragtning 640 om, at en vurdering af efterspørgslen for EU som helhed er vanskelig, og betragtning 608, hvoraf det fremgår, at en analyse af årsagssammenhængen pr. medlemsstat ikke vil føre til brugbare resultater.
After final disclosure one party claimed that there was a contradiction between the recital (640) above, that an assessment of the demand for the Union as a whole is difficult, and the recital (608) above stating that a causation analysis per Member State would not lead to meaningful results.
Det skal i den forbindelse præciseres, at vanskeligheden i en vurdering som beskrevet i betragtning 640 er at opstille et generelt billede af udviklingen i de faste afregningspriser for hele Unionen og ikke for EU-efterspørgslen, som påstået af den interesserede part.
In this respect, it is clarified that in the assessment made as described in recital (640) above, reference is made to the difficulty to draw a general picture of the FIT developments for the entire Union and not to the Union demand as claimed by the interested party.
Mens ovennævnte faktorer ganske vist kan have haft en indvirkning på de gennemsnitlige udgifter, kan de ikke begrunde, hvorfor EU-producenterne måtte sænke deres priser til et niveau under produktionsomkostningerne.
While the factors mentioned above may indeed have had an impact on the average costs they cannot explain why Union producers had to reduce their prices below their cost of production.
Det konkluderes derfor, at det hovedsagelig var den subsidierede import fra Kina, der har presset priserne til et uholdbart niveau, og påstanden blev afvist.
Therefore, it is concluded that it was mainly the subsidised imports from the PRC that pushed the prices to unsustainable levels and this claim was rejected.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse af oplysninger hævdede en part, at konklusionen i betragtning 641 om, at nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser også kan have været et resultat af de faldende priser og ikke omvendt, ikke er støttet af nogen dokumentation.
After final disclosure, one party claimed that the conclusion drawn in recital (641) above, that FIT cutbacks may have also been the result of the decreasing prices and not vice versa, is not supported by any evidence.
Det bemærkes, at konklusionerne i betragtning 641 blev baseret på de foreliggende oplysninger i forbindelse med undersøgelsen, og det beskrevne scenario blev faktisk anset for rimeligt i betragtning af omstændighederne på det specifikke marked.
It is noted that the conclusions drawn in recital (641) above were based on the information available during the investigation and the scenario described was indeed considered as reasonable given the circumstances in this specific market.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse af oplysninger var en part uenig i konklusionen om, at det nedadgående prispres på EU-producenterne hovedsagelig blev forårsaget af den subsidierede import, og påstod, at det tværtimod var nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser, der tvang EU-producenterne til at sænke deres priser.
After final disclosure, one party disagreed with the conclusion that the downward price pressure on Union producers was mainly exerted by the subsidised imports and claimed that, to the contrary, it was the FIT cutbacks that forced the Union producers to reduce their prices.
Den samme part gentog, at når der blev skåret ned i de faste afregningspriser, faldt priserne på solcelleanlæg i takt med nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser, således at projektudviklernes omkostninger ikke steg, hvilket i sidste ende forårsagede prispresset på EU-producenterne.
The same party reiterated that when FITs were reduced, the PV system prices decreased in line with the decrease in FITs so that costs for project developers do not increase, which ultimately caused the price pressure on the Union producers.
Da der ikke blev fremlagt afgørende beviser til støtte for disse påstande, fastholdt Kommissionen sin analyse og konklusionerne i betragtning 640-641.
Since no conclusive evidence was brought in support of these claims, the Commission maintained its analysis and conclusions as stated in recitals (640) to (641) above.
De oplysninger, som denne part fremlagde, var en publikation fra den britiske regering baseret på ugentlige registreringer i det centrale britiske register for faste afregningspriser (CFR).
The information provided by this party was a publication of the UK government based on the weekly registrations in the UK Central FiT Register (CFR).
Det bemærkes, at disse oplysninger hovedsagelig vedrørte en periode uden for UP og kun omhandlede én medlemsstat, mens den aktuelle undersøgelse vedrørte situationen på EU-markedet som helhed.
It is noted that this information related mostly to a period outside the IP and referred only to one Member State, while the current investigation focused on the situation of the Union market as a whole.
Under alle omstændigheder anfægtes det ikke, at de faste afregningspriser påvirker efterspørgslen, da rentabiliteten af investeringerne på steder med mindre soleksponering afhænger af de faste afregningsprisers niveau.
In any event, it is not contested that FIT levels influence demand, as the profitability of investments in locations with less solar radiation depends on the FIT level.
For at vise, at de faste afregningsprisers niveau i UP har forvoldt skaden, skulle de interesserede parter imidlertid have påvist, at en prisstigning hos EU-producenterne til det ikke-skadevoldende niveau ville have betydet, at EU-producenterne ikke ville have været i stand til at sælge den pågældende vare, fordi investeringer i solcellesystemer ikke ville have været rentable på disse prisniveauer.
However, in order to show that the level at which FIT were set during the IP has caused the injury, interested parties would have had to show that a price increase of the Union producers to the non-injurious level would have meant that the Union producers would not have been able to sell the product concerned because investments into PV systems would not have been viable at those price levels.
Der er ikke fremlagt sådanne oplysninger.
No such evidence has been provided.
En række parter påstod, at i en situation med lave faste afregningspriser var investeringer i solenergiprojekter kun økonomisk levedygtige, når der anvendes lavprissolpaneler importeret fra Kina.
Several parties claimed that in the context of the low FIT rates, investments in PV projects were economically viable only when supplied with the lower priced solar panels imported from the PRC.
Det blev derfor påstået, at nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser forvoldte EU-erhvervsgrenen væsentlig skade.
Therefore, it was argued that the FIT cutbacks caused material injury to the Union industry.
En anden part påstod, at de faste afregningsprisers niveau påvirker prisfastsættelsesmekanismen for moduler.
Another party argued that the level of the FIT rate influences the price setting mechanism for modules.
Det bør bemærkes, at de omkostninger til et modul, til hvilke et projekt stadig vil være økonomisk levedygtigt, varierer fra medlemsstat til medlemsstat eller region til region afhængigt af en lang række faktorer, såsom de faste afregningspriser, andre lovgivningsmæssige incitamenter, soleksponering, priser for konventionel elektricitet osv. Desuden viste undersøgelsen, at de nuværende anlæg er stadig mindre afhængige af de faste afregningspriser, idet der sandsynligvis vil være opnået netparitet for solceller for visse typer anlæg i flere regioner i Europa som f.eks. store dele af Italien, Spanien, Portugal, Sydfrankrig og Grækenland.
It should be noted that the cost of a module at which a project would still be economically viable varies by Member State or by region in function of numerous factors such as FITs, other regulatory incentives, sun exposure, conventional electricity prices, etc. In addition, the investigation showed that current installations depend less and less on the FITs as PV grid parity is likely to have been reached for certain types of installations in several regions in Europe, such as a large portion of Italy, Spain, Portugal, southern France and Greece.
Ud fra ovenstående blev disse påstande afvist.
On the above grounds, the claims made in this regard were rejected.
En interesseret part påstod, at Kommissionen ikke undersøgte, om EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke havde formået at tage højde for, at de offentlige støtteordninger med kort varsel ville ophøre eller blive reduceret.
One interested party claimed that the Commission did not investigate whether Union industry failed to anticipate that government support schemes would be abruptly withdrawn or decreased.
Der er ikke fremført argumenter til støtte for påstanden.
No arguments were brought in support of this claim.
Det bør dog bemærkes, at der på grundlag af det bevismateriale, der er indsamlet, ikke foreligger oplysninger om, at EU-erhvervsgrenen reagerede på markedsvilkår (dvs. udviklingen i forbruget) og andre tilgængelige oplysninger (dvs. reduktion af støtteordninger) på en urimelig måde.
However, it should be noted that, based on the evidence collected, there is no information indicating that the Union industry responded to the market signals (i.e. development in consumption) and other available information (i.e. reduction in support schemes) in an unreasonable way.
En interesseret part fremførte, at nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser forårsagede et fald i EU-erhvervsgrenens salg, da investeringerne kun havde været bæredygtige med de lave kinesiske priser.
One interested party argued that the FIT cutbacks caused Union industry sales decline because investments had been viable only at the affordable Chinese prices.