natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der blev dog ikke fremlagt supplerende beviser, og Kommissionen kan derfor ikke konkludere, at priserne på især coated solcelleglas er faldet væsentligt.
The users have been purchasing in increasing proportion coated solar glass rather than uncoated solar glass.
Kommissionen ser derfor ingen grund til at ændre sine tidligere konklusioner om, at en værditold er mere egnet til at fjerne de skadevoldende virkninger af dumping og subsidiering.
Consequently, coated solar glass has accounted for almost the totality of imports from the PRC into the EU in the second half of 2013 while during the IP the reverse was the case.
Hvad angår den anden bemærkning, var formålet med de pågældende betragtninger at illustrere, at Kommissionen ikke finder denne sag egnet til at indføre mindsteimportpriser, med mindre klageren uddyber sine påstande yderligere.
Anti-dumping measures may indeed take different forms.
Da dette ikke var tilfældet, ser Kommissionen ingen grund til yderligere at gøre rede for fordelen ved en eventuel mindsteimportpris for EU-erhvervsgrenens interesser.
While the Commission has a large discretion when choosing the form of the measures, the purpose remains to remove the effects of the injurious dumping.
Hvad angår den tredje bemærkning, har klageren ikke rejst tvivl om de forskellige varetyper, som Kommissionen har defineret i denne undersøgelse, og har ikke godtgjort, at der ikke ville forekomme en prisforskel.
The investigation confirmed that there is a significant difference in both costs and prices between uncoated and coated solar glass due to the difference in the technical characteristics of the two products.
De eksporterende producenters tilbud om tilsagn, som omfatter forskellige mindsteimportpriser, antyder også, at disse forskelle er reelle.
Indeed, coated solar glass, which depending on the technology used can be single or double-side coated, increases transmittance in comparison with uncoated solar glass and could have additional self-cleaning, anti-soiling or hardness properties.
Derfor afvises denne påstand.
A high quality uncoated solar glass can achieve a solar transmittance of up to 92 %.
Selv hvis Kommissionen godtog, at den pågældende vare er forholdsvis ensartet, finder den under alle omstændigheder dette spørgsmål irrelevant, da den også af de to ovennævnte årsager afviser anmodningen om en mindsteimportpris.
Coating can reduce reflection by approximately 3 % (per side) and consequently increase transmittance of single-side coated solar glass to a maximum of 95 % and double-side coated solar glass to a maximum of 98 %.
Der mindes desuden om, at Kommissionen kun i særlige tilfælde kan tage oplysninger i betragtning, hvis de vedrører perioden lige efter undersøgelsesperioden (jf. grundforordningens artikel 6, stk. 1).
During the IP 81 % of the imported, from the PRC, solar glass sold in the EU was uncoated whereas only 19 % was coated.
Klagerne har ikke bevist, at der her er tale om et sådant særligt tilfælde, og at andre foranstaltninger såsom overvågning ved hjælp af en supplerende Taric-kode ikke ville være tilstrækkelige.
Both price and cost differences found between uncoated and coated solar glass during the IP were around 30 %.
Sluttelig afviser Kommissionen derfor disse påstande.
However, the Commission considers that the evidence provided by the complainant was not sufficiently substantiated.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de endelige konklusioner gav en række producenter af solcellemoduler sig også til kende og foreslog en mindsteimportpris.
Furthermore, the Commission does not have at its disposal sufficient evidence or data from any other sources that would allow it to conclude that since the imposition of provisional anti-dumping measures demand has shifted from uncoated to coated solar glass and that prices of, in particular, coated glass have decreased significantly as alleged by the complainant.
Deres væsentligste betragtninger var følgende:
Consequently, the Commission cannot accept this claim and considers appropriate to impose ad valorem duties instead of MIPs.
Efter UP faldt produktionskapaciteten for solcelleglas markant, og mange EU-producenter trak sig uigenkaldeligt ud af markedet.
Nevertheless, in order to address the concerns raised above, two different Integrated Community Tariff codes (TARIC codes) — one for coated and one for uncoated solar glass — will be created.
De tre EU-producenter, der er tilbage på markedet, er ikke længere i stand til at dække mere end 50 % af efterspørgslen i Unionen.
They would enable the Commission to closely monitor the developments of the market and to decide in due time whether any further measures are needed.
Producenterne af solcellemoduler må således dække deres behov med indkøb fra Kina.
The Commission also recalls that in the past, it has used MIPs in specific circumstances, in particular in the following situations:
En bruger påstod, at den ville være tvunget til at placere sine ordrer hos en eller to EU-producenter, som ville være i stand til at leve op til de tekniske varespecifikationer.
A particular high export price for one product type, which meant that there was no dumping with regards to that product type [10],Considerations linked to market power and market share of Union producers, which made it necessary to ensure, for reasons of Union interest, that prices of imports do not exceed a certain level [11].(153) Furthermore, minimum import prices have been used mainly for homogenous products, and not for products like the present one, which comes in a variety of product types.
Den aktuelle told vil øge vareomkostningerne til solcellemoduler betydeligt med ca. 3 cent pr. watt, hvilket angiveligt svarer til fem procent af den mindsteimportpris, der blev fastlagt i solcellepanelsagen.
Also for those reasons, the Commission takes the view that minimum import prices are not suitable for the present file.
Mindsteimportprisen bør udformes således, at den ikke fører til højere omkostninger for producenterne af solcellemoduler i EU.
Following definitive disclosure, the complainant reiterated its request for the imposition of a MIP and commented on recitals 152 to 156 above by indicating the following.
Hvad angår det første argument, har Kommissionen ingen grund til at tro, at de EU-producenter der har reduceret eller midlertidigt indstillet deres produktion ikke vil starte igen med fuld kapacitet, når importen igen foregår til rimelige priser.
First, those recitals allegedly do not address considerations on the effectiveness of the form of the measures to remove the injurious effects of dumping and subsidisation which is also a valid reason to employ MIPs.
Som det fremgår af betragtning 106-112, har EU-erhvervsgrenen tilstrækkelig kapacitet til at imødekomme hele EU-forbruget.
Second, the Commission allegedly did not explain why these considerations are relevant in the present case and how they outweigh the EU industry’s interest.
Kommissionen afviser også brugerens påstand om, at den ville være tvunget til at placere sine ordrer hos en eller to EU-producenter.
Third, it argued that the product concerned is sufficiently homogenous to allow the practical administration of a MIP as the two main product types have clear distinctive features which allow a proper price differentiation and easy administration and monitoring, especially as nearly all imports are currently coated solar glass.
De kinesiske eksporterende producenter vil nemlig stadig kunne levere til EU-markedet.
Regarding the first claim, it appears that demand may indeed have shifted from uncoated to coated solar glass.
Antidumpingforanstaltningerne skal, uanset deres form, sikre, at importen foregår til rimelig priser, og ikke stoppe importen fra Kina helt.
However, as no additional evidence was provided, the Commission cannot conclude that prices of, in particular, coated solar glass have decreased significantly.
Hvad angår det andet argument, fremlagde brugerne ingen beviser for deres påstand.
Consequently, it has no reasons to change its previous conclusion that ad valorem duties are more appropriate to remove the injurious effects of dumping and subsidisation.
Derimod fastslog Kommissionen i betragtning 157 i forordningen om midlertidig told, at foranstaltningernes indvirkning ville være under 1 % for de samlede omkostninger til solcellemoduler for de producenter, der samarbejdede i forbindelse med denne undersøgelse.
With regard to the second comment, the purpose of the recitals in question was to illustrate that the Commission does not consider that this case is appropriate for the imposition of a MIP, unless the claims made by the complainant were further substantiated.
Påstanden afvises derfor.
As this was not done, the Commission does not deem necessary to further analyse the benefit of a possible MIP for the EU industry’s interest.
Det er derfor ikke nødvendigt at udtale sig om den tredje påstand, som blev fremsat af producenterne af solcellemoduler.
As far as the third comment is concerned, the complainant has not put into question the different product types defined by the Commission in the investigation, and has not demonstrated that there would be no price difference.
Der blev gennemført en antisubsidieundersøgelse sideløbende med antidumpingundersøgelsen.
The offer for an undertaking made by the exporting producers, which foresees different MIPs, indicates as well that these differences are real.
I betragtning af anvendelsen af reglen om den lavest mulige told og den kendsgerning, at de endelige subsidiemargener er lavere end skadestærsklen, bør Kommissionen indføre en endelig udligningstold på niveauet for de konstaterede endelige subsidiemargener og derefter pålægge en endelig antidumpingtold op til den relevante skadestærskel.
Therefore, that claim is rejected.
Ud fra ovenstående fastsættes tolden til følgende:
In any event, even if the Commission were to accept that the product concerned may be rather homogenous, it considers this issue irrelevant as it rejects the request for a MIP also for the other two reasons set out above.
Subsidiemargen
It also recalls that the Commission can take into consideration information that relates to the period subsequent to the investigation period only in exceptional cases (see Article 6(1) of the basic Regulation).
Udligningstold
The complainants have not demonstrated that the situation is such an exceptional situation, and that other available remedies, such as monitoring through the creation of an additional TARIC code, would not be sufficient.
Antidumpingtold
In conclusion, the Commission hereby rejects these claims.
De afspejler derfor den situation, der konstateredes for disse virksomheder i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
After definitive disclosure several solar modules producers also requested a MIP.
Disse toldsatser finder (i modsætning til den landsdækkende told for »alle andre virksomheder«) udelukkende anvendelse på importen af den pågældende vare med oprindelse i de pågældende lande, som er fremstillet af virksomhederne og dermed af de nævnte specifikke retlige enheder.
Their main concerns were:
Alle anmodninger om anvendelse af disse individuelle toldsatser (f.eks. efter ændring af den pågældende virksomheds navn eller efter oprettelse af nye produktions- eller salgsenheder) fremsendes til Kommissionen [12] sammen med alle relevante oplysninger, især om ændringer af virksomhedens aktiviteter i forbindelse med fremstilling og hjemmemarkeds- og eksportsalg i tilknytning til f.eks. den pågældende navneændring eller ændring vedrørende produktions- og salgsenheder.
after the IP the production capacity of solar glass declined massively and many Union manufacturers dropped irrevocably out of the market.
Om fornødent vil forordningen blive ændret ved en ajourføring af listen over virksomheder, der er omfattet af individuelle toldsatser.
The only three Union producers left on the market are no longer able to cover more than 50 % of the European demand.
Tilsagn
Thus solar modules manufacturers need to cover their needs with supplies from the PRC.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de endelige konklusioner fremsendte tre stikprøveudvalgte eksporterende producenter og Henan Yuhua pristilsagn i henhold grundforordningens artikel 8, stk. 1.
One user claimed that it would be forced to rely for its supply on only one or two Union producers which would be able to meet the required technical product specifications,
De omfatter forskellige mindsteimportpriser svarende til de forskellige varetyper.
duties, as they are now proposed, would increase product costs for solar modules significantly (by around 3 cents per watt which is allegedly five percent of the MIP established in the solar panels case),
Kommissionen bemærker, at de mindsteimportpriser, som samtlige virksomheder har foreslået, er meget lavere end de ikke-skadevoldende priser, som Kommissionen fastlagde i løbet af undersøgelsen.
the MIP should be designed in a way not to lead to higher costs for solar modules in the EU.
Kommissionen konkluderer derfor, at de ikke er fastsat på niveau med skadestærsklen, jf. grundforordningens artikel 8, stk. 1.
On the first argument, the Commission does not have any reasons to believe that those Union producers which have reduced or have temporarily ceased their production would not restart their business at full capacity once the imports are again made at fair prices.
Selv hvis de var fastsat til samme niveau som skadestærsklen, foreslår de stikprøveudvalgte virksomheder kun en kvartalsvis justering af prisen på coated solcelleglas på grundlag af ændringen i priserne på solcellemodulmarkedet.
As described in recitals 106 to 112 above, the Union industry disposes of sufficient capacity to satisfy the whole Union consumption.
Kommissionen kan ikke acceptere denne indekseringsmetode af følgende årsager.
The Commission also rejects the claim of one user that it would be forced to rely on only one or two Union producers for supplies.
For det første bør priserne på samtlige varetyper justeres regelmæssigt, da der ellers hurtigt kan skabes en kunstig forskel mellem prisniveauet for coated og ikke-coated solcelleglas.
In fact, Chinese exporting producers would still be able to supply the Union market.
For det andet finder Kommissionen det ikke hensigtsmæssigt at justere priserne på solcelleglas på grundlag de endelige brugeres priser (altså priserne på solcellemoduler).
The anti-dumping measures, irrespective of their form, should ensure that imports are made at fair prices, and are not meant to cease imports from the PRC altogether.
I denne sag blev der imidlertid ikke fundet en råvare, som udgjorde en væsentlig andel af de samlede produktionsomkostninger.
This claim is thus rejected.
Kommissionen fastslog endvidere, at priserne på solcelleglas var særdeles ustabile i UP i Kina og Tyrkiet.
It is therefore not necessary to take a view on the third point raised by the solar modules producers.
Disse faktorer gør den effektive gennemførelse af tilsagn umulig og vanskelig at overvåge.
On the basis of the above, the rate at which such duties will be imposed are set as follows:
Af ovennævnte årsager afviser Kommissionen derfor de pågældende tilbud om tilsagn.
Subsidy margin
Endelig opkrævning af midlertidig told
countervailing duty
Som følge af de konstaterede dumpingmargener og den skade, der er forvoldt EU-erhvervsgrenen, bør de beløb, for hvilke der er stillet sikkerhed i form af den midlertidige antidumpingtold, som blev indført ved forordningen om midlertidig told, opkræves endeligt.
Anti-dumping duty
Beløb, for hvilke der er stillet sikkerhed ud over den kombinerede endelige antidumpingtold og antisubsidietold, frigives.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
Foranstaltningernes gennemførlighed
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during this investigation with respect to these companies.
Hvis markedsbetingelserne ændrer sig væsentligt efter indførelsen af de endelige foranstaltninger, kan Kommissionen på eget initiativ gennemgå foranstaltningernes form for at vurdere, om foranstaltningerne fører til de ønskede resultater og eliminerer skaden, og om en ændring i foranstaltningernes form er berettiget.
These duty rates (as opposed to the country-wide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of product concerned originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
For bedst muligt at imødegå risikoen for overvæltning af foranstaltningerne, har Kommissionen til hensigt at indlede en fornyet undersøgelse i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 12, stk. 1, og vil eventuelt gøre import til genstand for registrering i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 14, stk. 5, hvis der fremlægges beviser for en sådan adfærd.
Imported product concerned produced by any other company whose name is not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, should not benefit from these rates and should be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Den indførte told kan i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 12, stk. 3, øges op til to gange den oprindeligt indførte told.
Due to the fact that there was high level of cooperation from the exporting producers (above 80 %, see recital 15 of the provisional Regulation), this duty rate is based on the highest individual injury margin established for the sampled exporting producers.
Kommissionen vil bl.a. benytte sig af oplysninger fra nationale toldmyndigheder om overvågning af importen og af oplysninger, der afgives af medlemsstaterne i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 14, stk. 6.
The duty applicable to ‘other cooperating companies’ is based on the weighted average of the sampled exporters and applies to all cooperating non-sampled companies (except for Henan Yuhua, which is subject to individually established duty following its request for individual examination (see recital 48 of the provisional Regulation)).
Det udvalg, der er nedsat ved grundforordningens artikel 15, stk. 1, har ikke afgivet udtalelse —
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (for example following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting-up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [12] with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
VEDTAGET DENNE FORORDNING:
If appropriate, the Regulation can be amended accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Artikel 1
Undertakings
Der indføres en endelig antidumpingtold på importen af solcelleglas bestående af hærdet planglas af natronkalk med et jernindhold på under 300 ppm, en soltransmission på over 88 % (målt i henhold til AM1.5 300-2500 nm), en varmebestandighed på indtil 250 °C (målt i henhold til EN 12150), en temperatursvingningsmodstand på Δ 150 K (målt i henhold til EN 12150) og en mekanisk modstandsdygtighed på 90 N/mm2 eller mere (målt i henhold til EN 1288-3), som for øjeblikket tariferes under KN-kode ex70071980, og med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina.
Following definitive disclosure, the three sampled exporting producers and Henan Yuhua offered price undertakings pursuant to Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Coated solcellegals (enkeltsidet eller dobbeltsidet) tariferes under Taric-kode 7007198019, og ikke-coated solcelleglas tariferes under Taric-kode 7007198011.
They envisage different MIPs corresponding to different groups of product types.
Den endelige antidumpingtold fastsættes til følgende af nettoprisen, frit Unionens grænse, ufortoldet, for de i stk. 1 omhandlede varer fremstillet af nedenstående virksomheder, som fremgår af følgende tabel:
The Commission notes that the proposed MIPs by all companies are much lower than the non-injurious prices which it established during the investigation.
Taric-tillægskode
Consequently, the Commission does not consider them to be set at the injury elimination level, in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Andre samarbejdsvillige virksomheder, der er anført i bilag I
Even if they were set at the injury elimination level, the sampled companies propose a quarterly adjustment only of the price of coated solar glass on the basis of the change in prices in the solar modules market.
Anvendelsen af de individuelle antidumpingtoldsatser, der er fastsat for de i stk. 2 nævnte virksomheder, er betinget af, at der over for medlemsstaternes toldmyndigheder fremlægges en gyldig handelsfaktura, der overholder kravene i bilag II.
The Commission cannot accept this method of indexation for the following reasons.
Hvis en sådan faktura ikke fremlægges, anvendes den told, der gælder for »alle andre virksomheder«.
First, the prices of all product types should be regularly adjusted, otherwise there may soon be an artificially created gap between the price levels of coated and non-coated solar glass.
De gældende bestemmelser vedrørende told finder anvendelse, medmindre andet er fastsat.
Second, the Commission does not consider appropriate to adjust the prices of solar glass on the basis of the final users’ prices (that is prices of solar modules).
Artikel 2
This could lead to an unjustified squeeze of the profit margins of the solar glass industry, if the prices of solar modules for example decrease because of the drop in prices of other solar modules components.
De beløb, for hvilke der er stillet sikkerhed i form af midlertidig antidumpingtold i henhold til Kommissionens forordning (EU) nr. 1205/2013 [13], opkræves endeligt.
In general, the Commission considers appropriate to index the MIPs with the prices of raw materials.
Beløb, for hvilke der er stillet sikkerhed ud over den kombinerede endelige antidumpingtold og antisubsidietold i artikel 1, stk. 2, og udligningstolden som vedtaget ved Kommissionens gennemførelsesforordning (EU) No 471/2014 [14] frigives.Artikel 3
However, in this particular case no raw material was found to constitute a significantly high proportion of the overall costs of manufacturing.
Hvis en ny eksporterende producent i Folkerepublikken Kina over for Kommissionen fremlægger tilstrækkelig dokumentation for, at:
The Commission also established that the prices of solar glass were significantly unstable during the IP in the PRC and Turkey.
den ikke har eksporteret den vare, der er beskrevet i artikel 1, stk. 1, til Unionen i undersøgelsesperioden (1. januar 2012 til 31. december 2012)
In addition, there is a high risk of cross compensation since some of the companies in question sell the product concerned as well as other products to the same customers.
den ikke er forretningsmæssigt forbundet med nogen af de eksportører eller producenter i Folkerepublikken Kina, som er genstand for de ved denne forordning indførte foranstaltninger
Finally, the proposed MIPs by the sampled companies do not seem to cover all product types manufactured by the respective exporting producers.
den faktisk har eksporteret den pågældende vare til Unionen efter den undersøgelsesperiode, hvorpå foranstaltningerne er baseret, eller har indgået en uigenkaldelig kontraktmæssig forpligtelse til at eksportere en væsentlig mængde til Unionen
These factors render the effective implementation of undertakings impracticable and difficult to monitor.
kan artikel 1, stk. 2, ændres ved at tilføje den nye eksporterende producent til de samarbejdsvillige virksomheder, der ikke indgik i stikprøven, og derfor er omfattet af den vejede gennemsnitlige toldsats på 24,1 %.
Consequently, for the reasons stated above, the Commission rejects the undertaking offers.
Artikel 4
Definitive collection of the provisional duties
Denne forordning træder i kraft dagen efter offentliggørelsen i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende.
In view of the dumping margins found and given the level of the injury caused to the Union industry, the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty, imposed by the provisional Regulation, should be definitively collected.