natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Påstanden om, at disse lande skulle have været omfattet af undersøgelsen, anses derfor ikke for begrundet og bør afvises.
The claim that these countries should have been included in the scope of the investigation is therefore not founded and should be rejected.
På baggrund af ovenstående konkluderes det, at eksporten fra tredjelande ikke havde bidraget væsentligt til den skade, EU-erhvervsgrenen havde lidt.
On the basis of above, it is concluded that exports from third countries did not contribute significantly to the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Ud fra dette kan det konkluderes, at EU-erhvervsgrenens eksportaktivitet ikke kunne udgøre en potentiel årsag til den væsentlige skade.
Based on this, it can be concluded that the export activity of the Union industry could not be a potential cause of material injury.
Den økonomiske krise og priserne på råvarer
The economic crisis and prices of raw materials
Som omhandlet i betragtning 68 var forbruget i 2009 særligt lavt på grund af det usædvanligt høje prisniveau på nikkel og virkningerne af den økonomiske krise.
As mentioned in recital 68 above, consumption in 2009 was particularly low due to the exceptional high price level of nickel and the effects of the economic crisis.
Det fremgik af undersøgelsen, at selv ikke under det generelle økonomiske genopsving var EU-erhvervsgrenen i stand at drage fordel af det stigende forbrug og tabte markedsandele i den betragtede periode, hvorimod dumpingimporten fra Indien øgede sin markedsandel.
The investigation showed that even during the general economic recovery, the Union industry was unable to benefit from the growing consumption and was losing market share throughout the period considered, whereas the dumped Indian exports gained more market share.
Selv om den økonomiske krise og prisstigningerne på råvarerne generelt kan have bidraget til EU-erhvervsgrenens dårlige resultater, kan den derfor ikke anses for at have en sådan virkning, at den kan bryde årsagssammenhængen mellem dumpingimporten og den væsentlige skade, som forvoldtes EU-erhvervsgrenen i UP.
Therefore, although the economic crisis and the increase in the prices of the raw materials may have contributed to the Union industry’s poor performance, overall, it cannot be considered to have an impact such as to break the causal link between the dumped imports and the material injury that the Union industry suffered during the IP.
Det er blevet påvist, at der var en markant stigning i mængden af og markedsandelen for dumpingimporten med oprindelse i Indien i den betragtede periode (henholdsvis 110 % og 40 %).
It has been demonstrated that there was a substantial increase in the volume and market share of the dumped imports originating in India in the period considered (by 110 % and by 40 % respectively).
Desuden blev det konkluderet, at denne import konstant underbød EU-erhvervsgrenens priser på EU-markedet og navnlig i UP (gennemsnitligt med 15 %).
In addition, it was found that these imports were constantly undercutting the prices charged by the Union industry on the Union market and in particular during the IP (on average by 15 %).
Undersøgelsen af de andre kendte faktorer, som kunne have forårsaget skade for EU-erhvervsgrenen, afslørede, at disse faktorer ikke var af en sådan beskaffenhed, at de kunne bryde årsagssammenhængen mellem dumpingimporten fra Indien og den skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt.
The examination of the other known factors which could have caused injury to the Union industry revealed that these factors were not such as to break the causal link established between the dumped imports from India and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
På baggrund af ovenstående analyse, hvor der blev behørigt skelnet mellem alle de kendte faktorer, der har betydning for EU-erhvervsgrenens situation, og de skadevoldende virkninger af dumpingimporten, konkluderes det foreløbigt, at dumpingimporten fra Indien har forvoldt EU-erhvervsgrenen væsentlig skade, jf. grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 6.
Based on the above analysis, which had distinguished and separated the effects of all known factors on the situation of the Union in industry from the injurious effects of the dumped exports, it is provisionally concluded that the dumped imports from India have caused material injury to the Union industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
I overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 21 er det blevet undersøgt, om der er tvingende årsager til at konkludere, at det i dette tilfælde ikke er i Unionens interesse at indføre foranstaltninger til trods for den foreløbige konklusion om, at der er tale om skadevoldende dumping.
In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation it has been examined whether, despite the provisional finding of injurious dumping, compelling reasons exist for concluding that it is not in the Union interest to adopt measures in this particular case.
Analysen af Unionens interesser var baseret på en vurdering af alle de forskellige involverede parters interesser, dvs. EU-erhvervsgrenens, importørernes og brugernes interesser.
The analysis of the Union interest was based on an appreciation of all the various interests involved, including those of the Union industry, importers, and users.
EU-erhvervsgrenen består af 27 kendte producenter, der tegner sig for hele EU- produktionen af samme vare.
The Union industry is composed of 27 known producers representing all of the Union production of the like product.
Producenterne er beliggende i forskellige EU-medlemsstater og beskæftigede direkte mere end 1747 personer i forbindelse med samme vare i UP.
The producers are located in different Member States of the Union, employing directly 1747 people in relation to the like product during the IP.
En EU-producent, der tegnede sig for en relativt lille del af EU-produktionen, og som har en forretningsmæssigt forbunden virksomhed i Indien, gjorde indsigelse mod indledningen af undersøgelsen.
One Union producer, representing a relatively small share of the Union production and having a related company in India opposed the initiation of the investigation.
Som anført i betragtning 22 indvendte den pågældende, at de højteknologiske varer ikke burde være omfattet, og at det ikke var i Unionens interesse at indføre de samme foranstaltninger på denne varetype.
As mentioned in recital 22, it also argued that the highly technical products should not be covered and that it was not in the Union interest to impose the same measures on this product type.
Som omhandlet i betragtning 72 blev denne problematik behandlet i spørgeskemaet ved at udvide varekontrolnummeret, som klart identificerede disse typer i undersøgelsen.
As mentioned in recital 72 this concern was addressed in the questionnaire by enlarging the PCNs which clearly identified these types in the investigation.
Imidlertid fremgik det på dette tidspunkt af undersøgelsen, at de højteknologiske varer var omfattet af undersøgelsen, og at indiske eksporterende producenter kun eksporterede begrænsede mængder af disse varetyper.
However, at this stage, the investigation revealed that highly technical products were covered by the investigation and that Indian exporting producers only exported limited quantities of these product types.
Heraf følger, at de betænkeligheder, som denne producent havde givet udtryk for, ikke blev anset for berettiget, og dennes påstand blev afvist.
Hence, the concerns expressed by this producer were not considered to be founded and its claim was rejected.
Det er blevet fastslået, at EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt væsentlig skade som følge af dumpingimporten fra Indien.
It has been established that the Union industry suffered material injury caused by the dumped imports from India.
Der mindes om, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke fuldt ud kunne drage fordel af det stigende forbrug, og EU-erhvervsgrenens økonomiske situation forblev sårbar.
It is recalled that the Union industry could not fully benefit from the growing consumption and the financial situation of the Union industry remained fragile.
Det forventes, at indførelsen af antidumpingtold vil genoprette rimelige handelsvilkår på EU-markedet, således at EU-erhvervsgrenens priser på samme vare kan tilpasses til produktionsomkostningerne.
It is expected that the imposition of anti-dumping duties will restore fair trade conditions on the Union market, allowing the Union industry to align its prices of the like product to the costs of production.
Det kan forventes, at indførelsen af foranstaltninger vil betyde, at EU-erhvervsgrenen kan genvinde i det mindste en del af den markedsandel, der blev tabt i den betragtede periode, med en positiv indvirkning på dens rentabilitet og generelle økonomiske situation.
It can also be expected that the imposition of measures will enable the Union industry to regain at least part of the market share lost during the period considered, with a positive impact on its profitability and overall financial situation.
Indførelsen af foranstaltninger vil gøre det muligt for erhvervsgrenen at opretholde og yderligere udvide sine bestræbelser og således blive omkostningseffektiv.
The imposition of measures would enable the industry to maintain and further develop its efforts to be cost efficient.
Hvis der ikke indføres foranstaltninger, kan der forventes yderligere tab af markedsandele, og EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet vil sandsynligvis forværres.
Should measures not be imposed, further losses in market share could be expected and the Union industry’s profitability would deteriorate.
Det konkluderes derfor foreløbigt, at det vil være i EU-erhvervsgrenens interesse, at der indføres en antidumpingtold på importen med oprindelse i Indien.
It is, therefore, provisionally concluded that the imposition of anti-dumping measures on imports originating in India would be in the interest of the Union industry.
Der blev udsendt spørgeskemaer til ni brugere i Unionen.
Questionnaires were sent to nine users in the Union.
Gennemsnitligt udgjorde indkøbene fra Indien ca. 67 % af deres samlede indkøb af den pågældende vare, og Indien var den eneste importkilde for kun en bruger.
On average, purchases from India constituted around 67 % of their total purchases of the product concerned, and India represented the exclusive source of supply only for one user.
I UP udgjorde den gennemsnitlige procentdel af omsætningen, hvor den pågældende vare indgår, 54 % af deres samlede omsætning.
During the IP, the average percentage of the turnover incorporating the product concerned represented 54 % of their total turnover.
Undersøgelsen viste, at den gennemsnitlige rentabilitet for alle samarbejdsvillige brugere i UP i de sektorer, hvor den pågældende vare anvendes, var på over 9 % af omsætningen.
The investigation showed that, during the IP, the average profitability of all cooperating users in the sectors which use the product concerned was above 9 % on turnover.
Den sandsynlige virkning af de foreslåede foranstaltninger blev vurderet ud fra brugernes spørgeskemabesvarelser, det samlede EU-marked for den pågældende vare og for den samme vare.
The likely effect of the proposed measures was assessed on the basis of questionnaire replies received from the users and the total Union market for the product concerned and the like product.
Selv hvis man går ud fra det værst tænkelige scenarie for EU-markedet, dvs. at der ikke kan videregives prisstigninger til distributionskæden, og brugerne fortsætter med at købe de hidtidige mængder fra Indien, vil virkningen af tolden på brugernes rentabilitet betyde et fald på ca. 1,2 procentpoint.
Assuming the worst case scenario for the Union market, i.e. that no price increase could be passed on to the distribution chain and that the users would continue purchasing from India in previous volumes, the impact of the duty on the users’ profitability would mean a decrease of around 1,2 percentage points.
Det skal bemærkes, at en bruger indtog en neutral position med hensyn til undersøgelsen, da denne var af den opfattelse, at indførelsen af foranstaltninger ikke ville få en væsentlig betydning på markedspriserne, da den potentielle prisstigning ville blive absorberet af distributørerne.
It has to be noted that one user had a neutral position regarding the investigation because it considers that the imposition of measures will have no significant effect on the market prices as the potential price increase would be absorbed by the distributors.
En anden bruger udtrykte betænkeligheder ved, at foranstaltningerne, hvis de indførtes, også ville ramme visse varetyper, som ikke længere produceres i Unionen.
Another user expressed concerns that, if imposed, measures would hit also certain product types that are no longer produced in the Union.
Det fremgik imidlertid af undersøgelsen, at den varetype, som den pågældende bruger henviste til, stadig produceres i Unionen, og at efterspørgslen efter disse former for rustfri stålsorter ikke er af betydning.
The investigation showed, however that the product types referred to by the said user are still produced in the Union and that the demand of those types of stainless steel grades is not significant.
Det bør desuden bemærkes, at EU-producenterne ikke producerede med fuld kapacitet i den betragtede periode, og derfor vil produktionen kunne følge med, hvis efterspørgselen skulle stige.
Moreover, it should be noted that the Union producers did not produce at full capacity during the period considered, and therefore if demand increases the production could follow accordingly.
Det bør påpeges, at eftersom den pågældende vare er standardiseret med hensyn til sektor og brug, kan brugerne relativt nemt skifte leverandør, for så vidt angår produktkvaliteten eller prisen.
It should be pointed out that since the product concerned is standardised in terms of sector and use, users could easily change their sources of supply as far as the product quality, or price is concerned.
Indførelsen af foranstaltninger bør ikke udelukke muligheden for at importere den pågældende vare fra andre lande, heller ikke fra Indien, når de handelsfordrejende virkninger som følge af dumping er blevet fjernet.
The imposition of measures should not preclude the possibility for importing the product concerned from other countries and even from India once trade distorting effects due to dumping have been removed.
Under hensyntagen til ovennævnte anses den generelle virkning på brugerne for begrænset, selv om visse brugere sandsynligvis vil blive mere negativt berørt end andre af foranstaltningerne på indisk import.
Taken the above into consideration, even if certain users are likely to be impacted more negatively than others by the measures on Indian imports, the overall impact on users is considered limited.
Der blev kun opnået begrænset samarbejde fra de ikke forretningsmæssigt forbundne importører.
Limited cooperation was obtained from unrelated importers.
Ni importører indsendte stikprøveoplysninger, men kun en samarbejdede.
Nine importers provided sampling information, but only one cooperated.
Selv om indførelsen af foranstaltninger vil få en negativ virkning på dennes rentabilitet på grund af de højere omkostninger, bør den importerende virksomhed være i stand til at overvælte i det mindste en del af de øgede omkostninger på sine kunder.
Although the imposition of measures would have a negative impact on its profitability due to the higher costs to be incurred, the importing company should be in a position to pass on at least part of the increased cost to its customers.
Endvidere vil importørerne kunne skifte til andre kilder, herunder EU-erhvervsgrenen, og til andre eksporterende lande.
Furthermore, importers could shift to other sources including the Union industry and other exporting countries.
På det grundlag konkluderes det foreløbigt, at det ikke vil have væsentlige negative virkninger for importørernes interesser, hvis der indføres midlertidige foranstaltninger.
On this basis, it is provisionally concluded that the imposition of anti-dumping measures will not have substantially negative effects on the interest of importers.
Ud fra ovenstående blev det på grundlag af oplysningerne om Unionens interesser foreløbigt konkluderet, at der ikke er tvingende grunde til ikke at indføre foranstaltninger over for importen af den pågældende vare fra Indien.
In view of the above, it is provisionally concluded that overall, based on the information concerning the Union interest, there are no compelling reasons against the imposition of measures on imports of the product concerned from India.
Hvis man betragter den samlede indvirkning af antidumpingforanstaltningerne på EU-markedet, lader de positive virkninger navnlig på EU-erhvervsgrenen desuden til klart at opveje de mulige negative virkninger på de andre mere begrænsede interessegrupper.
Moreover, when considering the overall impact of the anti-dumping measures on the Union market, the positive effects, in particular on the Union industry, appear to outweigh the potential negative impacts on the other more limited interest groups.
For at fastlægge omfanget af disse foranstaltninger blev der taget hensyn til de konstaterede dumpingmargener og den told, som er nødvendig for at afhjælpe den skade, der er forvoldt EU-erhvervsgrenen.
For the purpose of determining the level of these measures, account was taken of the dumping margins found and the amount of duty necessary to eliminate the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Ved beregningen af den told, som er nødvendig for at afhjælpe virkningerne af skadevoldende dumping, blev det fastslået, at enhver foranstaltning bør give EU-erhvervsgrenen mulighed for at dække sine produktionsomkostninger og opnå en fortjeneste før skat på salget af samme vare i Unionen, som det med rimelighed kan forventes for en erhvervsgren af denne type i sektoren under normale konkurrencevilkår, dvs. en situation uden dumpingimport.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measure should allow the Union industry to cover its costs of production and obtain a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved by an industry of this type in the sector under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports, on sales of the like product in the Union.
Derfor blev skadestærsklen beregnet på grundlag af en sammenligning mellem den vejede gennemsnitlige importpris som fastsat med henblik på beregningen af underbud, jf. betragtning 77, og EU-erhvervsgrenens ikke skadevoldende pris for samme vare.
Therefore, the injury elimination level was calculated on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average price of the dumped imports, as established for the price undercutting calculations in recital 77 above, and the non-injurious price of the Union industry for the like product.
Den ikke-skadevoldende pris blev fastsat ved, at en rimelig fortjenstmargen blev lagt til produktionsomkostningerne.
The non-injurious price was established by adding to the cost of production a reasonable profit level.
Målfortjenstmargenen blev midlertidigt sat til 5 % som anført i betragtning 95.
The target profit margin was provisionally set at 5 % as stated in recital 95.
Forskelle som følge af denne sammenligning blev dernæst udtrykt som en procentdel af den gennemsnitlige cif-importpris, jf. betragtning 154.
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the average total CIF import price, see recital 154.
Ud fra ovenstående bør der i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 7, stk. 2, indføres en midlertidig antidumpingtold på importen af visse former for tråd af rustfrit stål med oprindelse i Indien svarende til enten dumping- eller skadesmargenen, afhængigt af hvad der er lavest, i henhold til reglen om den lavest mulige told.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that, in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, provisional anti-dumping duties should be imposed in respect of imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India at the level of the lower of the dumping and the injury margins, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Hvad angår den parallelle antisubsidieprocedure, jf. grundforordningens artikel 14, stk. 1, og artikel 24, stk. 1, andet afsnit, i Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 597/2009 af 11. juni 2009 om beskyttelse mod subsidieret indførsel fra lande, der ikke er medlemmer af Det Europæiske Fællesskab [5], må ingen vare pålægges både antidumping- og udligningstold med det formål at afhjælpe en og samme situation, der er opstået som følge af dumping eller eksportsubsidiering.
As concerns the parallel anti-subsidy investigation, pursuant to Article 14(1), of the basic Regulation and Article 24(1) second subparagraph of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [5] no product shall be subject to both anti-dumping and countervailing duties for the purpose of dealing with the one and the same situation arising from dumping and from export subsidisation.
Alle subsidieordninger, der er behandlet i forordningen om midlertidige antisubsidier [6], henviser til eksportsubsidier.
All subsidy schemes addressed in the provisional anti-subsidy regulation [6] refer to export subsidisation.
De relevante foreløbige antidumpingtoldsatser for de samarbejdsvillige producenter er derfor justeret i overensstemmelse hermed.
The relevant provisional anti-dumping duty rates of the cooperating producers concerned are therefore adjusted accordingly.
Den midlertidige antidumpingtold blev således fastlagt ved at sammenligne skadestærsklerne, dumpingmargenerne og udligningstoldsatserne.
On the basis of the above, the provisional anti-dumping duty rates have been established by comparing the injury margins, dumping margins and the countervailing duty rates.
Midlertidig antidumpingtoldsats
Provisional anti-dumping duty rate
De antidumpingtoldsatser for de enkelte virksomheder, der er anført i denne forordning, blev fastsat ud fra konklusionerne i denne undersøgelse.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
Alle anmodninger om anvendelse af disse individuelle toldsatser (f.eks. efter ændring af den pågældende virksomheds navn eller efter oprettelse af nye produktions- eller salgsenheder) fremsendes straks til Kommissionen [7] sammen med alle relevante oplysninger, især om ændringer af virksomhedens aktiviteter i forbindelse med fremstilling og hjemmemarkeds- og eksportsalg i tilknytning til f.eks. den pågældende navneændring eller ændring vedrørende produktions- og salgsenheder.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [7] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Desuden bør det fremføres, at de konklusioner, der ligger til grund for indførelsen af antidumpingtold i denne forordning, er foreløbige og kan tages op til fornyet overvejelse i lyset af de endelige konklusioner —
Furthermore, it should be stated that the findings concerning the imposition of anti-dumping duties made for the purposes of this Regulation are provisional and may have to be reconsidered for the purposes of any definitive findings,
Der indføres en midlertidig antidumpingtold på importen af visse former for tråd af rustfrit stål med en vægtprocent på:
A provisional anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of wire of stainless steel containing by weight:
Den midlertidige antidumpingtold på nettoprisen, frit Unionens grænse, ufortoldet, for den i stk. 1 omhandlede vare fremstillet af nedenstående virksomheder fastsættes til følgende:
The rates of the provisional anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the product described in paragraph 1 and produced by the companies below shall be: