natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ændringerne i tillæg G (ATMF) sigter mod at ajourføre bestemmelserne vedrørende teknisk godkendelse af jernbanemateriel, der anvendes i international transport, klarlægge hvilke funktioner og relationer der findes mellem den kontraherende stat som defineret i nævnte tillæg, den kompetente myndighed og bedømmelsesenheden, samt harmonisere termer i overensstemmelse med EU-retten.
The amendments to Appendix G (ATMF) aim to update the provisions concerning the technical admission of railway material used in international traffic, clarify the functions of and relations between the contracting State as defined in that Appendix, the competent authority and the assessing entity as well as harmonise terms in line with Union law.
Ændringerne i tillæg F (APTU) sigter mod at bevare sammenhængen med det reviderede tillæg G (AMTF).
The amendments to Appendix F (APTU) aim to maintain consistency with the revised Appendix G (ATMF).
Ændringerne i tillæg E (CUI), som er foreslået af Den internationale komité for jernbanetransport (CIT), sigter mod at udvide anvendelsesområdet for de fælles regler vedrørende kontrakterne om brug af køretøjer i international jernbanetrafik, at skabe et juridisk grundlag for de almindelige betingelser for anvendelse af jernbaneinfrastruktur og at udvide infrastrukturforvalterens erstatningsansvar for skader eller tab forårsaget af infrastrukturen.
The amendments to Appendix E (CUI) suggested by the Internation Rail Transport Committee (CIT) aim to extend the scope of the uniform rules concerning the contract of use of infrastructure to domestic rail transport, to create a legal basis for general terms and conditions of use of railway infrastructure and to extend the liability of the infrastructure manager for damage or losses caused by the infrastructure.
OTIF's generalsekretær har foreslået også redaktionelle ændringer, så termen »De Europæiske Fællesskaber« erstattes af »Den Europæiske Union« i hele konventionen såvel som tillæggene dertil.
The Secretary-General of OTIF has also proposed editorial changes to replace the term ‘European Communities’ by ‘European Union’ throughout the COTIF Convention and the Appendices thereto.
De fleste af de foreslåede ændringer er i overensstemmelse med EU-retten og Unionens strategiske målsætninger, og Unionen bør derfor støtte dem.
Most of the proposed amendments are in line with the law and the strategic objectives of the Union, and should therefore be supported by the Union.
Visse ændringer har ingen betydning for EU-retten, og der er derfor ikke behov for at tage stilling hertil på EU-plan.
Certain amendments have no impact on EU law and do not need a position to be agreed at Union level.
Endelig har Unionen brug for yderligere at drøfte visse ændringer, hvorfor disse bør afvises på mødet i revisionsudvalget.
Finally, some amendments need more discussion within the Union and should be rejected at this meeting of the Revision Committee; should the latter amendments be approved without modification that is acceptable for the Union, the Union should formulate an objection following the procedure established in Article 35(4) of the COTIF Convention,
Hvis sidstnævnte ændringer bliver godkendt uden tilpasninger, som Unionen kan acceptere, bør Unionen gøre indsigelse efter proceduren i artikel 35, stk. 4, i COTIF-konventionen —
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Artikel 1
The position to be taken on the Union's behalf at the 25th session of the Revision Committee set up by the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail shall be in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Den holdning, som på Unionens vegne skal indtages på det 25. møde i revisionsudvalget nedsat ved konventionen om internationale jernbanebefordringer, skal være i overensstemmelse med bilaget til denne afgørelse.
Minor changes to the documents mentioned in the Annex to this Decision may be agreed by the representatives of the Union in the Revision Committee without further Decision of the Council.
Repræsentanterne for Unionen i revisionsudvalget kan uden yderligere afgørelse truffet af Rådet aftale mindre ændringer af de dokumenter, der er nævnt i bilaget til denne afgørelse.
Article 2
Artikel 2
After its adoption, the Decision of the Revision Committee shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Revisionsudvalgets afgørelse offentliggøres efter vedtagelsen i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende.
Article 3
Artikel 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.
Denne afgørelse træder i kraft på dagen for vedtagelsen.
Done at Luxembourg, 24 June 2014.
Udfærdiget i Luxembourg, den 24. juni 2014.
For the Council
E. Venizelos
Council Decision 2013/103/EU of 16 June 2011 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail on the Accession of the European Union to the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF) of 9 May 1980, as amended by the Vilnius Protocol of 3 June 1999 (OJ L 51, 23.2.2013, p. 1).
Rådets afgørelse 2013/103/EU af 16. juni 2011 om undertegnelse og indgåelse af aftalen mellem Den Europæiske Union og Den Mellemstatslige Organisation for Internationale Jernbanebefordringer (OTIF) om Den Europæiske Unions tiltrædelse af konventionen om internationale jernbanebefordringer (COTIF) af 9. maj 1980, som ændret ved Vilniusprotokollen af 3. juni 1999 (EUT L 51 af 23.2.2013, s. 1).
ANNEX
BILAG
INTRODUCTION
INDLEDNING
The Secretary-General of OTIF has convened the 25th session of the Revision Committee (RC) of COTIF Convention in Berne on 25-27 June 2014.
OTIF's generalsekretær har indkaldt til det 25. møde i revisionsudvalget under COTIF-konventionen, som skal finde sted i Bern den 25.-27. juni 2014.
REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
DOKUMENTER, SOM DER HENVISES TIL
Documents concerning the agenda items were circulated to OTIF Member States and are available on the website of OTIF at the following link: http://otif.org/en/law/revision-committee/working-documents.html
De dokumenter, der vedrører dagsordenen, blev rundsendt til OTIF's medlemsstater og kan tilgås på OTIF's websted på adressen: http://otif.org/en/law/revision-committee/working-documents.html.
COMMENTS ON EACH AGENDA ITEM
KOMMENTARER TIL HVERT PUNKT PÅ DAGSORDENEN
ITEM 1.
DAGSORDENSPUNKT 1.
OPENING THE MEETING AND ESTABLISHING THE QUORUM
ÅBNING AF MØDET OG FASTSÆTTELSE AF DET BESLUTNINGSDYGTIGE FLERTAL
Document: none.
Dokument: Intet.
Competence: shared.
Kompetence: Delt.
Exercising voting rights: not applicable.
Udøvelse af stemmeret: Ikke relevant.
Recommended coordinated position: none.
Anbefalet koordineret holdning: Ingen.
There is a quorum in the RC when the majority of the OTIF Member States enjoying the right to vote are represented there at the time of the vote.
Revisionsudvalget er beslutningsdygtigt, når flertallet af OTIF-medlemsstaterne med stemmeret er til stede på afstemningstidspunktet.
However, Article 13(3) of the COTIF Convention provides that OTIF Member States having made a declaration concerning the non-application of one or more Appendices do not have the right to vote concerning amendments to the given Appendix.
Det fastsættes imidlertid i artikel 13, stk. 3, i COTIF-konventionen, at OTIF-medlemsstater, som har afgivet erklæring om manglende anvendelse af en eller flere af tillæggene, ikke har ret til at stemme om ændringer, der vedrører pågældende tillæg.
The following OTIF Member States have not withdrawn their declarations on the non-application of certain Appendices:
Følgende OTIF-medlemsstater har ikke trukket deres erklæringer om manglende anvendelse af visse tillæg tilbage:
Pakistan, Russia (concerning Uniform Rules concerning the Contract of International Carriage of Passengers by Rail (CIV), the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Rail (RID), CUV, CUI, APTU and ATMF), Georgia (concerning CUV, CUI, APTU and ATMF), the Czech Republic, Norway, Slovakia, the United Kingdom (concerning CUI, APTU and ATMF), France (concerning ATMF).
Pakistan, Rusland (med hensyn til fælles regler om kontrakten om international befordring af passagerer med jernbane (CIV), international befordring af farligt gods med jernbane (RID), CUV, CUI, APTU og ATMF), Georgien (med hensyn til CUV, CUI, APTU og ATMF), Den Tjekkiske Republik, Norge, Slovakiet, Det Forenede Kongerige (med hensyn til CUI, APTU og ATMF) og Frankrig (med hensyn til ATMF).
When discussing amendments to the relevant Appendices, the number of OTIF Member States having made a declaration on the non-application of the Appendix in question has to be deducted from the number of active members of OTIF (46) to establish the quorum concerning the vote on the Appendix in question.
I drøftelsen af ændringer af de pågældende tillæg skal antallet af OTIF-medlemsstater, der har afgivet erklæringer om manglende anvendelse af dette tillæg, trækkes fra antallet af aktive medlemmer af OTIF (46) med henblik på at fastsætte det beslutningsdygtige flertal for den givne afstemning.
In the case of Union competence, the Union may vote for all of its members having the right to vote, without regard to the physical presence of those members at the vote; thus, the quorum may be different in the case of the Union representing its Member States and in the case of Union Member States voting for themselves.
I tilfælde, hvor Unionen har kompetence, kan Unionen stemme for alle sine medlemmer med stemmeret uden hensyntagen til disse medlemmers fysiske tilstedeværelse ved afstemningen; det beslutningsdygtige flertal kan følgelig være forskelligt i tilfælde, hvor Unionen repræsenterer sine medlemsstater, og i tilfælde, hvor EU-medlemsstaterne stemmer på egne vegne.
ITEM 2.
DAGSORDENSPUNKT 2.
ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
VALG AF FORMAND OG NÆSTFORMAND
Exercising voting rights: Member States.
Udøvelse af stemmeret: Medlemsstaterne.
ITEM 3.
DAGSORDENSPUNKT 3.
ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
VEDTAGELSE AF DAGSORDENEN
Document: CR 25/3.
Dokument: CR 25/3.
ITEM 4.
DAGSORDENSPUNKT 4.
PARTIAL REVISION OF COTIF — BASIC CONVENTION
DELVIS REVISION AF COTIF — BASISKONVENTIONEN
Documents: CR 25/4, CR 25/4 Add.
Dokumenter: CR 25/4, CR 25/4 Add.
Recommended coordinated position:
Anbefalet koordineret holdning:
Amendments to Article 3 (International cooperation) to be supported (editorial change to replace the reference to the ‘European Communities’ with a reference to the ‘European Union’).
Ændringer af artikel 3 (internationalt samarbejde) skal støttes (redaktionel ændring, hvor der i stedet for »De Europæiske Fællesskaber« henvises til »Den Europæiske Union«).
Amendments to Article 12 (Execution of judgments.
Ændringer af artikel 12 (fuldbyrdelse af afgørelser, bilag) skal støttes, da der er tale om en ændring af definitionen af »ihændehaver« i overensstemmelse med EU-retten.
Attachment) to be supported as it amends the definition of ‘keeper’ in line with Union law.
Ændringer af artikel 20 (det tekniske ekspertudvalg) skal støttes, fordi det er nødvendigt at ajourføre de fælles regler for APTU og for ATMF, så de er i overensstemmelse med EU-retten.
Amendments to Article 20 (Committee of Technical Experts) to be supported as they are necessary to update the APTU Uniform Rules and ATMF Uniform Rules in order to keep them in line with Union law.
Andre ændringer: Der er ikke behov for en EU-holdning, da disse ændringer vedrører finansiering af organisationen og revision eller omfatter administrative ændringer angående arbejdsprogrammet, årsrapporten og listerne over strækninger og tjenester, som ikke har nogen indvirkning på EU-retten.
Other amendments: no Union position necessary as these amendments relate to the financing of the organisation, auditing or include administrative changes regarding the work programme, the annual report and the lists of lines or services which have no impact on Union law.
DAGSORDENSPUNKT 5.
ITEM 5.
DELVIS REVISION AF TILLÆG B (CIM)
PARTIAL REVISION OF APPENDIX B (CIM)
Dokumenter: CR 25/5, CR 25/5 Add.
Documents: CR 25/5, CR 25/5 Add.
Udøvelse af stemmeret: Unionen hvad angår artikel 6 og 6a; medlemsstaterne hvad angår de øvrige artikler.
Exercising voting rights: Union for Articles 6 and 6a; Member States for other Articles.
Ændringer af artikel 6 og artikel 6a angår EU-retten pga. anvendelsen af fragtbreve og ledsagedokumenter i forbindelse med procedurer vedrørende told, sundhed og plantesundhed.
Amendments to Article 6 and new Article 6a concern Union law because of the use of the consignment note and its accompanying documents for customs and sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) procedures.
Unionen bifalder OTIF's hensigt om at prioritere fragtbreve i elektronisk form.
The Union agrees with the intention of OTIF to give priority to the electronic form of consignment notes.
Vedtagelsen af disse ændringer kan dog, som det ser ud nu, få utilsigtede konsekvenser.
However, at present the adoption of these amendments may lead to unintended consequences.
Den nuværende forenklede procedure for toldforsendelse med jernbane er kun mulig med papirdokumenter.
The current simplified procedure for customs transit by rail is only possible with paper documents.
Hvis jernbaner vælger det elektroniske fragtbrev, vil de derfor være nødt til at bruge standardforsendelsesproceduren og det nye EDB-baserede forsendelsessystem (NCTS).
Therefore, if railways opt for the electronic consignment note, they will have to use the standard transit procedure and the New Computerised Transit System (NCTS).
I gældende EU-ret er der imidlertid intet juridisk grundlag for at kræve, at dokumenter (f.eks. det fælles veterinærdokument og det fælles importdokument), som skal ledsage sundheds- og plantesundhedsmæssige varer, forelægges i elektronisk form, og disse skal derfor fremlægges i papirform.
That working group will have its kick-off meeting on 4-5 June 2014.
Kommissionen har udarbejdet et udkast til forordning, som tager højde for elektronisk certificering, og udkastet bliver i øjeblikket drøftet i Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet.
The Union agrees also with the intention to provide the accompanying documents in electronic format.
Det forventes, at nævnte forordning (forordningen om offentlig kontrol) vil blive vedtaget i slutningen af 2015 eller begyndelsen af 2016, men der vil dog være en overgangsperiode for dens håndhævelse.
However, under current Union law there is no legal basis to provide the documents (e.g. Common Veterinary Entry Document, Common Entry Document) which have to accompany SPS-related goods in electronic format and therefore they need to be provided on paper.
DAGSORDENSPUNKT 6.
That Regulation (Official Control Regulation) is envisaged to be adopted by end of 2015/beginning of 2016, however, there will be a transitional period for the enforcement.
ELEKTRONISKE DOKUMENTER VEDRØRENDE TRANSPORT AF FARLIGT GODS — OPLYSNINGER OM EKSPERTUDVALGET FOR RID'S ARBEJDE
Therefore, the Union suggests that no decision should be taken on these items at the present session of the RC and that OTIF continue cooperation with the Union on this issue in order to have a well-prepared solution for an upcoming revision of CIM which should ideally be synchronised with the Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and its implementing provisions which are to be in force from 1 May 2016.
Kompetence: Unionen.
Other amendments: no Union position necessary as these provisions do not interfere with Union law.
Anbefalet koordineret holdning: Oplysningerne tages til efterretning.
ITEM 6.
DAGSORDENSPUNKT 7.
ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE CARRIAGE OF DANGEROUS GOODS — INFORMATION ON THE WORK OF THE RID COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS
DELVIS REVISION AF TILLÆG D (CUV)
Document: CR 25/6.
Dokumenter: CR 25/7, CR 25/7 Add.
Competence: Union.
Udøvelse af stemmeret: Unionen.
Recommended coordinated position: to take note of the information.
Anbefalet EU-holdning: Ændringerne af artikel 2 og 9 støttes, eftersom de er med til at klarlægge, hvilken rolle ihændehaveren og den enhed, der har ansvaret for vedligeholdelse, spiller, hvilket er i overensstemmelse med EU-retten (Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2008/110/EF [2]).
ITEM 7.
Den foreslåede ændring af artikel 7, som Frankrig har fremlagt, og som betyder, at den person, der har stillet et køretøj til rådighed som transportmiddel, bærer erstatningsansvaret i tilfælde af skader som følge af defekter ved dette køretøj, skal undersøges nærmere i Unionen, før der træffes afgørelse i OTIF.
PARTIAL REVISION OF APPENDIX D (CUV)
Unionen kan derfor ikke støtte dette ændringsforslag ved revisionsudvalgets møde og foreslår at udsætte afgørelsen til næste generalforsamling med henblik på at vurdere spørgsmålet yderligere.
Documents: CR 25/7, CR 25/7 Add.
Unionen har samme holdning, dvs. at udsætte afgørelsen til næste generalforsamling med henblik på at vurdere spørgsmålet yderligere, for så vidt angår Tysklands forslag om en ny artikel 1a, der blev forelagt for OTIF i forbindelse med EU-koordineringen.Supplerende anbefalet EU-holdning: I dokument CR 25/7 Add.
Exercising voting rights: Union.
1, s. 6, stk. 8a, indsættes følgende in fine: »The amendment to Article 9, paragraph 3, first indent, does not affect the existing allocation of liabilities between ECM and the keeper of the vehicles.«
Recommended Union position: Amendments to Articles 2 and 9 to be supported as they clarify the roles of the keeper and of the entity in charge of maintenance in line with Union law (Directive 2008/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2]).However, the proposed amendment to Article 7 submitted by France concerning the liability of the person who has provided a vehicle for use as a means of transport in case of damage resulting from a defect of the vehicle needs further analysis within the Union before taking a decision in OTIF.
DAGSORDENSPUNKT 8.
Therefore, the Union is not in a position to support this amendment proposal at this RC and proposes to postpone the decision until the next General Assemblyin order to further assess this issue.
REVISION AF TILLÆG G (ATMF)
The Union takes the same position, i.e. to postpone the decision until the next General Assembly in order to further assess the issue, on the proposal of Germany for a new Article 1a presented to OTIF during Union coordination.Additional recommended Union position: In document CR 25/7 ADD 1, page 6, at the end of paragraph 8a, add: ‘The amendment to Article 9, paragraph 3, first indent, does not affect the existing allocation of liabilities between ECM and the keeper of the vehicles.’.
Dokumenter: CR 25/8, CR 25/8 Add.
ITEM 8.
For så vidt angår J.nr..
REVISION OF APPENDIX G (ATMF)
CR 25/8 Revision af tillæg G (ATMF)
Documents: CR 25/8, CR 25/8 Add.
Støttes med følgende kommentarer:
On Ref.
Følgende punktum indsættes i artikel 3a, stk. 3:
CR 25/8 Revision of Appendix G (ATMF)
»When operating in the EU, railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall only be subject to European legislation.«
To vote in favour with the following comments:
Unionen kan eventuelt acceptere følgende alternativer:
add the following sentence to Article 3a(3):
»For railway undertakings and infrastructure managers, when operating within the EU, EU legislation takes precedence over the provisions in these Uniform Rules«
‘When operating in the EU, railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall only be subject to European legislation.’
Artikel 4, stk. 1: Følgende punktum indsættes in fine [efter litra b)]:
‘For railway undertakings and infrastructure managers, when operating within the EU, EU legislation takes precedence over the provisions in these Uniform Rules.’
Artikel 5, stk. 5: Henvisningen rettes; »Article 2w1)« erstattes af »Article 2wa(1)«.
‘When operating within the European Union, railway undertakings and infrastructure managers are solely subject to European Union rules and shall therefore not apply these Uniform Rules except in so far as there is no EU rule governing the particular subject concerned.’
For så vidt angår 25/8 Add.
‘If the vehicle is admitted in a single stage, the type of construction of the vehicle is admitted at the same time.’
Begrundelsen for revisionen af tillæg G (ATMF)
Article 5(5): Correct the reference; replace ‘Article 2w1)’ with ‘Article 2wa(1)’,
Generelle begrundelser (nederst på s. 2): Punktummet ændres, som følger: »The changes which are not covered by these general justifications are explained in the rest of this document.«
Article 19: Combine Article 19(2) and (2a) by deleting (2a) and replacing (2) by the following modified text:
Artikel 2, litra t): Nyt afsnit indsættes: »When infrastructure managers operate vehicles, e.g. freight wagons to transport materials for construction or for infrastructure maintenance activities, the infrastructure managers do so in the capacity of a railway undertaking.«
‘These Uniform Rules do not affect admissions issued before 1.1.2011 for vehicles which exist as at 1.1.2011 and which are marked RIV or RIC as proof of current compliance with the technical provisions of the RIV 2000 agreement (revised edition of 1 January 2004) or the RIC agreement respectively, and for existing vehicles not marked RIV or RIC but admitted and marked according to bilateral or multilateral agreements between Contracting States notified to the Organisation.’
Artikel 4, stk. 1, litra b): Tilføj modul SH1, da designtypeattesten, der udstedes i modulets designfase, også giver mulighed for at anvende den beskrevne procedure.
On 25/8 Add.
Punktummet affattes herefter som følger:
Justification document for the Revision of Appendix G (ATMF)
»According to Article 10 § 8, the appropriate manner to demonstrate that the vehicle corresponds to the admitted type of construction is a certificate of verification, it is not really a simplified procedure.
General justifications (end of page 2): modify the sentence as follows: ‘The changes which are not covered by these general justifications are explained in the rest of this document.’,
The certificate of verification is issued according to the appropriate module defined in the UTP(s) concerned which may be module SD or module SF for type examination certificate or module SH1 for design examination certificate.«
point (t) of Article 2: add a new paragraph ‘When infrastructure managers operate vehicles, e.g. freight wagons to transport materials for construction or for infrastructure maintenance activities, the infrastructure managers do so in the capacity of a railway undertaking.’,
Artikel 7, stk. 1a: For at bringe fortolkningen af denne bestemmelse i overensstemmelse med Unionens (artikel 8, stk. 7, i Kommissionens henstilling 2011/217/EU [3]) indsættes følgende punktum:»Due to the fact that the admission procedures can take several months, it is recommended that the rules to be applied by the competent authority for a specific admission process are those that were in force at the date of the application and that no new rule is imposed during the subsequent process.«
point (b) of Article 4(1): Add module SH1 since the design type certificate issued in the design phase of this module also provides the possibility to use the procedure described.
Artikel 15, stk. 1, andet punktum: »nicht« slettes.
Article 5(2): ‘assessing entities’ is translated as ‘Bewertungsstelle’.
Artikel 15a, stk. 1, andet punktum: Indsæt et punktum efter »entsprechen«, og start et tredje punktum med »Es hat insbesondere:«.
According to the ETV GEN-E ‘the assessing entity’ is translated as ‘Prüforgan’.
I den franske udgave affattes definitionen i artikel 2, litra n), således:
In the Union the term ‘Bewertungsstelle’ is especially assigned to assessment bodies according to the common safety method for risk assessment (CSM RA).
DAGSORDENSPUNKT 9.
Therefore, the OTIF term according to Article 5(2) could be misleading.
DELVIS REVISION AF TILLÆG F (APTU)
The proposal is to use the word ‘Prüforgan’ in ATMF.
Dokumenter: J.nr.: CR 25/9, CR 25/9 Add.
See also point (cb) of Article 2, Article 5(3)-(7), Article 6(4), Article 10(3a), (4), (6)-(8),
Anbefalet koordineret holdning: De redaktionelle ændringer støttes.
Article 5(4): change the wording ‘Die Anforderungen in § 3 gelten sinngemäß für die zuständige Behörde, in Bezug auf die in § 2 genannten Aufgaben, die nicht an eine Bewertungsstelle übertragen wurden.’,
DAGSORDENSPUNKT 10.
Article 10(8): delete the brackets,