natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
IMO's Komité til Beskyttelse af Havmiljøet (MEPC) vedtog på sin 66. samling ændringer af protokollen fra 1978 til Marpolkonventionen, jf. resolution MEPC.246(66) af 4. april 2014, og af protokollen fra 1997 til Marpolkonventionen som ændret ved protokollen fra 1978 i den henseende, jf. resolution MEPC.247(66) af 4. april 2014, med henblik på at gøre III-koden obligatorisk sammen med en dertil hørende flagstatsauditordning.
The IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) at its 66th session adopted amendments to the Protocol of 1978 relating to the MARPOL Convention, as set out in resolution MEPC.246(66) of 4 April 2014, and to the Protocol of 1997 relating to the MARPOL Convention, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, as set out in resolution MEPC.247(66) of 4 April 2014, with a view to rendering the III Code mandatory, together with an associated flag State audit scheme.
IMO's Komité for Sikkerhed på Søen (MSC) vedtog på sin 93. samling ændringer til Solaskonventionen, jf. resolution MSC.366(93) af 22. maj 2014, og af protokollen fra 1988 til lastelinjekonventionen, jf. resolution MSC.375(93) af 22. maj 2014, med henblik på at gøre III-koden obligatorisk sammen med en dertil hørende flagstatsauditordning.
The IMO Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) at its 93rd session adopted amendments to the SOLAS Convention, as set out in resolution MSC.366(93) of 22 May 2014, and to the Protocol of 1988 relating to the Load Lines Convention, as set out in resolution MSC.375(93) of 22 May 2014, with a view to rendering the III Code mandatory, together with an associated flag State audit scheme.
På MEPC's 65. samling og MSC's 92. samling blev der vedtaget en IMO-kode for anerkendte organisationer (RO-kode), jf. resolution MSC.349(92) af 21. juni 2013.
The MEPC at its 65th session and the MSC at its 92nd session adopted an IMO Code for Recognized Organizations (RO Code), as set out in resolution MSC.349(92) of 21 June 2013.
MEPC vedtog på sin 65. samling ændringer af protokollen fra 1978 til Marpolkonventionen med henblik på at gøre RO-koden obligatorisk, jf. resolution MEPC.238(65) af 17. maj 2013.
The MEPC at its 65th session adopted amendments to the Protocol of 1978 relating to the MARPOL Convention with a view to rendering the RO Code mandatory, as set out in resolution MEPC.238(65) of 17 May 2013.
MSC vedtog på sin 92. samling ændringer af Solaskonventionen og af protokollen fra 1988 om lastelinjekonventionen med henblik på at gøre RO-koden obligatorisk, jf. resolution MSC.350(92) og MSC.356(92) af 21. juni 2013.
The MSC at its 92nd session adopted amendments to the SOLAS Convention and to the Protocol of 1988 relating to the Load Lines Convention with a view to rendering the RO Code mandatory, as set in resolutions MSC.350(92) and MSC.356(92) of 21 June 2013.
III-koden og RO-koden forventes derfor at træde i kraft i perioden mellem den 1. januar 2015 og den 1. januar 2018 i overensstemmelse med gældende regler for vedtagelse, ratifikation og ikrafttrædelse af ændringer for hver enkelt berørt konvention.
The III and RO Codes are therefore expected to enter into force during the period between 1 January 2015 until 1 January 2018 in accordance with the applicable rules for the adoption, ratification and entry into force of amendments under each of the IMO conventions concerned.
Den 13. maj 2013 vedtog Rådet Rådets afgørelse 2013/268/EU om den holdning, der skal indtages på vegne af Den Europæiske Union i den Internationale Søfartsorganisation (IMO) til vedtagelsen af bestemte koder og dertil knyttede ændringer af visse konventioner og protokoller [4].
On 13 May 2013, the Council adopted Council Decision 2013/268/EU on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the International Maritime Organization (IMO) with regard to the adoption of certain Codes and related amendments to certain conventions and protocols [4].
I henhold til artikel 5 i denne afgørelse bemyndigede Rådet medlemsstaterne til at give deres samtykke til i Unionens interesse og under hensyntagen til erklæringen i bilaget til afgørelsen at lade sig binde af de ændringer, der er omhandlet i betragtning 4-9 i dette direktiv.
Pursuant to Article 5 of that Decision, the Council authorised the Member States to give their consent to be bound, in the interest of the Union and subject to the declaration set in the Annex of that Decision, by the amendments referred to in recitals (4) to (9) of this Directive.
Det anføres i den erklæring, der er vedlagt som bilag til Rådets afgørelse 2013/268/EU, at medlemsstaterne har den holdning, at III-koden og RO-koden indeholder en række minimumskrav, som staterne efter behov kan videreudvikle og forbedre med henblik på at forbedre sikkerheden til søs og beskytte miljøet.
The declaration annexed to Council Decision 2013/268/EU states that Member States consider that the III Code and the RO Code contain a set of minimum requirements on which States can elaborate and improve as appropriate for the enhancement of maritime safety and the protection of the environment.
Det anføres ligeledes, at III-koden og RO-koden ikke kan udlægges således, at den på nogen måde begrænser opfyldelsen af medlemsstaternes forpligtelser i henhold til EU-retten i forbindelse med definitionen af »myndighedscertifikater« og »klassecertifikater«, omfanget af forpligtelser og kriterier, der er fastlagt for anerkendte organisationer, og Europa-Kommissionens pligter med hensyn til anerkendelse og vurdering og eventuel pålæggelse af korrigerende foranstaltninger eller sanktioner for anerkendte organisationer.
It also states that nothing in the III Code or RO Code shall be construed to restrict or limit in any way the fulfilment of Member States' obligations under the law of the Union in relation to the definition of ‘statutory certificates’ and ‘class certificates’, the scope of the obligations and criteria laid down for recognised organisations, and the duties of the European Commission as regards the recognition, assessment and, where appropriate, the imposition of corrective measures or sanctions on recognised organisations.
Det hedder i samme erklæring, at i tilfælde af en IMO-audit vil medlemsstaterne erklære, at kun overholdelsen af de bestemmelser i de relevante internationale konventioner, som medlemsstaterne har accepteret, også under betingelserne i denne erklæring, kontrolleres.
The same declaration states that, in the case of an IMO audit, Member States will state that only compliance with those provisions of the relevant international conventions which Member States have accepted, including in the terms of this declaration, shall be verified.
I Unionens retsorden omfatter anvendelsesområdet for direktiv 2009/15/EF og forordning (EF) nr. 391/2009 henvisninger til »internationale konventioner« som beskrives i betragtning 3.
In the legal order of the Union, the scope of Directive 2009/15/EC as well as that of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 includes references to the ‘international conventions’ as described in recital (3).
I den henseende indføres ændringer af IMO-konventioner samtidig automatisk i EU-lovgivningen, når de træder i kraft på internationalt niveau, herunder de dertil knyttede koder af bindende karakter, som f.eks. III-koden og RO-koden, som derfor udgør en del af de IMO-instrumenter, der er relevante for anvendelsen af direktiv 2009/15/EF.
In this framework, amendments to IMO conventions are automatically brought into Union law at the same time when they enter into force at the international level, including the related codes of mandatory status such as the III and RO codes, which therefore form part of the IMO instruments relevant for the application of Directive 2009/15/EC.
Ændringer til internationale konventioner kan imidlertid udelukkes fra anvendelsesområdet for Unionens søtransportlovgivning i overensstemmelse med proceduren for overensstemmelseskontrol, hvis de opfylder mindst et af de to kriterier, der er fastsat i artikel 5, stk. 2, i forordning (EF) nr. 2099/2002.
Amendments to international conventions may however be excluded from the scope of Union maritime legislation in accordance with the conformity checking procedure if they meet at least one of the two criteria set out in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002.
Kommissionen har evalueret ændringerne af IMO-konventionerne i henhold til artikel 5 i forordning (EF) nr. 2099/2002 og fastslået, at der findes en række uoverensstemmelser mellem på den ene side III-koden og RO-koden og på den anden side direktiv 2009/15/EF og forordning (EF) nr. 391/2009.
The Commission evaluated the amendments to the IMO conventions in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 and determined that a number of discrepancies exist between, on the one hand, the III Code and the RO Code, and, on the other hand, Directive 2009/15/EC and Regulation (EC) No 391/2009.
For det første fastlægger III-kodens punkt 16.1 i del 2, en minimumsliste over ressourcer og processer, som flagstaterne skal stille til rådighed, herunder tilvejebringelse af administrative instrukser bl.a. vedrørende klassecertifikater, som flagstaten skal fremlægge som bevis for overholdelse af strukturelle, mekaniske, elektriske og/eller andre krav i en international konvention, som flagstaten er part i, eller overholdelse af et krav i flagstatens nationale lovgivning.
First, paragraph 16.1 of part 2 of the III Code provides for a minimum list of resources and processes which flag States have to establish, including the provision of administrative instructions pertaining inter alia to ship class certificates required by the flag State to demonstrate compliance with structural, mechanical, electrical, and/or other requirements of an international convention to which the flag State is a party or compliance with a requirement of the flag State's national regulation.
Som beskrevet i betragtning 21 nedenfor sondrer Unionens lovgivning imidlertid mellem myndighedscertifikater og klassecertifikater.
As detailed in recital (21) below however, Union law draws a distinction between statutory certificates and class certificates.
Sidstnævnte er dokumenter af privat karakter og er hverken udstedt af en flagstat eller på en flagstats vegne.
The latter are documents of a private nature and are neither acts of a flag State nor issued on any flag State's behalf.
Denne bestemmelse i III-koden henviser til Solas, kapitel II-1, del A-1, regel 3-1, der foreskriver, at skibe skal konstrueres, bygges og vedligeholdes i overensstemmelse med de strukturelle, mekaniske og elektriske krav, der er fastsat af et klassifikationsselskab, der er anerkendt af myndighederne i henhold til bestemmelserne i regel XI-1/1.
This provision of the III Code in fact refers to SOLAS Chapter II-1, Part A-1, Regulation 3-1, which provides that ships shall be designed, constructed and maintained in compliance with the structural, mechanical and electrical requirements of a classification society which is recognized by the Administration in accordance with the provisions of regulation XI-1/1.
Når en anerkendt organisation handler i sin egenskab af klassifikationsselskab udsteder den endvidere klassecertifikater i overensstemmelse med sine egne regler, procedurer, betingelser og private kontraktlige aftaler, som flagstaten ikke er part i. Derfor er bestemmelserne i III-koden i modstrid med sondringen mellem klassifikations- og myndighedsaktiviteter som fastsat i den eksisterende EU-lovgivning.
Furthermore, when acting in its capacity as class society, a recognised organisation issues ship class certificates in accordance with its own rules, procedures, conditions and private contractual arrangements, to which the flag State is not a party.
For det andet kræves det i III-kodens punkt 18.1 i del 2, at flagstaten “udelukkende for skibe under statens eget flag” sikrer, at en anerkendt organisation har tilstrækkelige tekniske ressourcer samt ledelses- og forskningsressourcer til at udføre de opgaver, den får pålagt.
Therefore, this provision of the III Code contradicts the delineation of class and statutory activities as set out in the existing EU legislation.
Dette aspekt behandles derimod i EU-lovgivningen som et krav for anerkendelse, jf. kriterie A.3 i bilag I til forordning (EF) nr. 391/2009, og finder anvendelse på hele flåden i den anerkendte organisations klasse, uanset hvilket flag skibene fører.
Second, paragraph 18.1 of part 2 of the III Code requires the flag State to determine, ”with regard only to ships entitled to fly its flag”, that a recognised organisation has adequate resources in terms of technical, managerial and research capabilities to accomplish the duties entrusted to it.
Hvis ovennævnte bestemmelse i III-koden indarbejdes i EU-lovgivningen, vil den begrænse anvendelsen af kriterie A.3 i bilag I i forordning (EF) nr. 391/2009 til udelukkende at omfatte den virksomhed, der udføres af den anerkendte organisation med hensyn til skibe, der fører en medlemsstats flag, hvilket er i modstrid med de nugældende krav.
In contrast, this aspect is addressed under Union law as a requirement for the purpose of the recognition as reflected in criterion A.3 in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, and with regard to the entire fleet in the class of the organisation concerned, without distinction based on flag.
For det tredje indfører III-kodens punkt 19 i del 2, et forbud mod, at en flagstat kræver af sine anerkendte organisationer, at de for andre skibe end dem, der fører dens flag, anvender krav bl.a. vedrørende deres klassifikationsregler og andre krav eller procedurer.
Should the above provision of the III Code be incorporated into Union law, it would restrict the application of criterion A.3 in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 to the recognised organisation's performance with regard only to ships flying the flag of Member States, in contradiction with the requirements currently in force.
I henhold til direktiv 2009/15/EF kan medlemsstaterne kun bemyndige en organisation til på deres vegne at udstede myndighedscertifikater for deres respektive flåder, hvis den pågældende organisation er blevet godkendt og kontrolleres i den henseende i henhold til forordning (EF) nr. 391/2009.
Third, paragraph 19 of part 2 of the III Code introduces a prohibition for a flag State to mandate its recognised organisations to apply to ships, other than those entitled to fly its flag, any requirements pertaining to inter alia their classification rules, requirements or procedures.
Inden for denne ramme skal de anerkendte organisationers relevante aktiviteter som sådan opfylde visse krav vedrørende hele flåden i deres klasse, uanset hvilket flag skibene fører.
Pursuant to Directive 2009/15/EC, Member States can only authorise an organisation to act on their behalf for the statutory certification of their respective fleet if that organisation has been recognised and is being monitored for this purpose in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 391/2009.
Det gælder de fleste af de kriterier, der fremgår af bilag I til forordning (EF) nr. 391/2009 samt andre forpligtelser, navnlig forordningens artikel 10, stk. 4.
In this framework, the recognised organisations as such have to comply with certain requirements in their relevant activities across their classed fleet, irrespective of the flag.
Hvis ovennævnte bestemmelse i III-koden indarbejdes i EU-lovgivningen, vil den begrænse anvendelsen af de eksisterende krav til anerkendelse i forordning (EF) nr. 391/2009, bl.a. hvis der er tale om regler, krav og procedurer, til udelukkende at omfatte den anerkendte organisations virksomhed vedrørende skibe, der fører en medlemsstats flag.
This relates to most of the criteria set out in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, as well as to other obligations, in particular Article 10(4) of that Regulation.
Baseret på Kommissionens vurdering som nævnt i betragtning 21, 22 og 23 forekommer det, at flere bestemmelser i del 2 i RO-koden er uforenelige med forordning (EF) nr. 391/2009.
Should the above provision of the III Code be incorporated into Union law, it would restrict the application of the existing recognition requirements in Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 inter alia if they qualify as rules, requirements and procedures to the recognised organisation's performance with regard only to ships flying the flag of Member States.
På grund af den forbindelse, der eksisterer mellem de to instrumenter, jf. betragtning 2, er denne risiko også relevant for direktiv 2009/15/EF.
Based on the Commission's evaluation set out in recitals (21) to (23), it appears that several provisions in part 2 of the RO Code are incompatible with Regulation (EC) No 391/2009.
For det sjette foreskrives der i afsnit 3.9.3.1 i del 2 i RO-koden en mekanisme for samarbejde mellem anerkendte organisationer udelukkende inden for de af flagstaten fastsatte rammer med henblik på eventuelt at standardisere procedurerne for myndighedscertificering og myndighedstjenester for flagstaten.
Consequently, a recognised organisation as defined in the RO Code would not fulfil all the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 and could therefore not meet the definition of a recognised organisation as set out in Union law.
Hverken III-koden eller RO-koden bør kunne begrænse Unionens muligheder for i overensstemmelse med traktaterne og international ret at fastlægge passende betingelser for udstedelse af anerkendelse til organisationer, der ønsker at blive anerkendt af medlemsstaterne til at udføre skibssyn og certificering af skibe på deres vegne med henblik på at opnå Unionens mål, herunder især for at forbedre sikkerheden på søen og beskytte miljøet.
Notwithstanding this contradiction, this provision of the RO Code, if accepted as a norm in the Union legal order, entails a manifest risk that the recognition requirements contained in Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 which pertain to the entire activity of the organisation, irrespective of flag, could no longer be enforced within the EU.
Ordningen for gensidig anerkendelse af klassecertifikater for materialer, udstyr og komponenter, jf. artikel 10, stk. 1, i forordning (EF) nr. 391/2009 gælder kun i Unionen for skibe, der fører en medlemsstats flag.
Due to the link between the two instruments as explained in recital (2), this risk is also relevant to Directive 2009/15/EC.
Hvad angår udenlandske skibe, træffer de relevante tredjelandsflagstater selv beslutning om godkendelse af de relevante certifikater under udøvelse af deres eksklusive kompetence, navnlig inden for rammerne af De Forenede Nationers havretskonvention (UNCLOS).
Sixth, section 3.9.3.1 of part 2 of the RO Code provides for a mechanism of co-operation between recognised organisations under the sole framework established by the flag State with the view to standardising processes concerning statutory certification and services for the flag State, as appropriate;
På grundlag af sin vurdering har Kommissionen fastlagt, at bestemmelserne i III-koden og i RO-koden som anført i de foregående betragtninger er uforenelige med direktiv 2009/15/EF, eller med forordning (EF) nr. 391/2009 og dermed også direktiv 2009/15/EF på grund af forbindelsen mellem de to instrumenter, jf. betragtning 2, og bør udelukkes fra direktivets anvendelsesområde.
whereas section 3.9.3.2 of part 2 of the same Code establishes a framework ”by a flag State or a group of flag States” to regulate co-operation among their recognised organisations on technical and safety-related aspects of ”statutory certification and services of ships […] on behalf of the said flag State(s)”.
Artikel 2, litra d), i direktiv 2009/15/EF bør derfor ændres i overensstemmelse hermed.
In contrast, co-operation between recognised organisations under Union law is governed by Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, which requires recognised organisations to consult with each other with a view to maintaining equivalence and aiming for harmonisation of their rules and procedures and the implementation thereof, and sets out a framework for the mutual recognition, in appropriate cases, of class certificates for materials, equipment and components.
Da RO-koden træder i kraft den 1. januar 2015, bør dette direktiv træde i kraft så hurtigt som muligt efter datoen for offentliggørelse.
Those two co-operation processes under Article 10(1) pertain to the private activities of the recognised organisations, in their capacity as classification societies, and therefore apply without distinction based on flag.
Udvalget for Sikkerhed til Søs og Forebyggelse af Forurening fra Skibe (USS) har ikke afgivet udtalelse om foranstaltningerne i dette direktiv.
The co-operation mechanisms provided for in the RO Code, if incorporated into Union law, would therefore limit the scope of the co-operation framework established by Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 to the recognised organisations' activities with regard only to ships flying the flag of Member States, in contradiction with the requirements currently in force.
Det blev anset for at være nødvendigt med en gennemførelsesretsakt, og formanden forelagde udkastet til en gennemførelsesretsakt for appeludvalget til yderligere drøftelse.
Seventh, section 3.9.3.3 of part 2 of the RO Code is identical to paragraph 19 of part 2 of the III Code;
Foranstaltningerne i dette direktiv er i overensstemmelse med udtalelse fra appeludvalget —
therefore the considerations made in recital (19) are equally relevant to this provision of the RO Code.
VEDTAGET DETTE DIREKTIV:
Nothing in either the III Code or the RO Code should place any restrictions on the Union's capacity to lay down, in accordance with the Treaties and international law, appropriate conditions for the granting of recognition to organisations wishing to be authorised by the Member States to carry out ship survey and certification activities on their behalf, with a view to achieving the Union's objectives and in particular to enhance maritime safety and the protection of the environment.
Artikel 1
The scheme for the mutual recognition of class certificates for materials, equipment and components laid down by Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 is only enforceable within the Union in respect of ships flying the flag of a Member State.
Artikel 2, litra d), i direktiv 2009/15/EF affattes således:
As far as foreign vessels are concerned, the acceptance of relevant certificates remains at the discretion of relevant non-EU flag States in the exercise of their exclusive jurisdiction, notably under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
den internationale konvention om sikkerhed for menneskeliv på søen af 1. november 1974 (Solas 74), bortset fra kapitel XI-2 i bilaget dertil, den internationale konvention om lastelinjer af 5. april 1966 og den internationale konvention om forebyggelse af forurening fra skibe af 2. november 1973 (Marpol), tillige med protokoller hertil og ændringer heraf, samt de dertil hørende koder af bindende karakter i alle medlemsstater, bortset fra punkt 16.1, 18.1 og 19 i del 2 i koden til gennemførelse af IMO-instrumenter, og afsnit 1.1, 1.3, 3.9.3.1, 3.9.3.2 og 3.9.3.3 i del 2 i IMO-koden for anerkendte organisationer, i den gældende affattelse.«
Based on its evaluation, the Commission determined that the provisions of the III Code and of the RO Code referred to in the preceding recitals are incompatible with Directive 2009/15/EC, or with Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 and consequently with Directive 2009/15/EC due to the link between the two instruments as explained in recital (2), and should be excluded from the scope of that Directive.
Artikel 2
Therefore Article 2(d) of Directive 2009/15/EC should be amended accordingly.
Medlemsstaterne vedtager og offentliggør senest den 31. december 2015 de love og administrative bestemmelser, der er nødvendige for at efterkomme dette direktiv.
As the RO Code enters into force on 1 January 2015, this Directive should enter into force as soon as possible after its date of publication.
De tilsender straks Kommissionen disse love og bestemmelser.
The Committee on Safe Seas and the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (COSS) did not deliver an opinion on the measures provided for in this Directive.
De anvender disse bestemmelser fra den 1. januar 2016.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.