natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Støtteberettigede projekter omfatter projekter iværksat af eksportvirksomheder og sigter bl.a. mod at forbedre deres eksportgrundlags konkurrenceevne og afsøge internationale markeder.
Eligible projects include those undertaken by exporting enterprises inter alia to improve the competitiveness of their export base and to explore international markets.
Fordi disse tilskud er betinget af eksportresultater, er dette program specifikt efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 4, litra a).
Because these grants are contingent upon export performance, this programme is specific according to Article 4(4)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Med hensyn til ii) momsrefusioner udgør de ved køb af anlægsaktiver subsidier i form af indtægt, som staten giver afkald på, jf. grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1, litra a), nr. ii).
With regard to (ii) VAT refunds, for the purchase of fixed assets, they constitute a subsidy in the form of revenue forgone by the State according to Article 3(1)(a)(ii) of the basic Regulation.
I henhold til dette program kan visse momspligtige erhvervsgrene fratrække moms af køb af anlægsaktier fra moms af salg af færdigvarer.
This programme provides that VAT taxpayers of certain industries may deduct VAT for purchases of fixed assets from the VAT for sales of finished goods.
Dette momsfradrag er begrænset til virksomheder beliggende i den nordøstlige region og er derfor regionalt specifikt efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 3.
This VAT deduction is limited to firms located in the northeast region and is therefore regionally specific within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the basic Regulation.
Eftersom der ikke forelå nogen nøjagtig kvantificering andetsteds, var den mest hensigtsmæssige informationskilde med henblik på vurderingen af fordelen for de eksporterende producenter de amerikanske myndigheders sammenlignelige afgørelse (baseret på ligheder i programmernes art).
In the absence of precise quantification elsewhere, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been a comparable decision (based on similarity in the nature of the programme) by the US authorities.
Den samlede subsidiesats for genopretningsprogrammet for den nordøstlige region under UP for alle ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder er således fastsat til 0,18 %, hvilket svarer til den akkumulerede sats for tilskuddene og momsrefusionerne modtaget under Foreign Trade Development Fund Program som fastslået i US Decision Memorandum of 17 November 2008 on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe (Line Pipe) (side 21 og 22) (Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 227, side 70961 / 24. november 2008).
The total subsidy rate thus established for the Northeast Revitalization Programme during the IP for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,18 % which corresponds to the accumulated rate for the grants and VAT refunds received under the Foreign Trade Development Fund Program as established in the US Decision Memorandum of 17 November 2008 on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe (Line Pipe) (Pages 21 and 22) (Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 227, page 70961 / 24 November 2008).
Med hensyn til de amerikanske myndigheders undersøgelser bemærkes det, at den metode, der er anvendt til at beregne fordelen ved tilsvarende programmer, i alt væsentligt er den samme som den, der anvendes af Unionen [84].
With regard to investigations conducted by the US authorities, it is noted that the methodology used for calculating the amount of benefit from similar programmes is substantially the same as that employed by the Union [84].
Rentetilskud i forbindelse med eksport
Export interest subsidies
Retsgrundlaget er provinsforvaltningen i Liaonings foranstaltninger vedrørende rentetilskud i forbindelse med eksport af højteknologiske produkter og udstyr til produktfremstilling, indført den 16. december 2004.
The legal basis is the Provisional Administration Measures on High Tech Products and Equipment Manufacturing Products Export Financial interest Assistance of Liaoning Province, established on 16 December 2004.
Det blev hævdet i klagen, at der under programmet ydes bistand til virksomheder til at udvide eksporten af højteknologiske produkter og subsidier til udviklingen af virksomheder beliggende i Liaoning-provinsen.
The complaint alleged that this programme provides assistance to companies to expand the export of high-tech products and supports the development of enterprises located in the Liaoning Province.
Programmet forvaltes af Liaoning-provinsens kontor for udenrigshandel og økonomisk samarbejde og finansdepartementet i Liaoning og økonomiudvalget i Liaoning-provinsen.
The programme is managed by the Liaoning Provincial Bureau of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation, the Liaoning Department of Finance, and the Economic Commission of Liaoning province.
Dette program er udligningsberettiget i henhold til de amerikanske myndigheders afgørelse om Line Pipe (jf. betragtning 359).
The US authorities have found this programme countervailable in the above-mentioned decision concerning Line Pipe (see recital (359).
Støtteberettigede virksomheder skal have en årlig eksportværdi på over 1 mio. USD og have eksporteret produkter henhørende under Kinas katalog over højteknologisk produkteksport eller produkter til fremstilling af udstyr.
Eligible enterprises must have an annual export value above $ 1 million and have exported products falling in the scope of the "China High-Tech Product Export Catalogue" or the scope of equipment manufacturing products.
Programmet er derfor specifikt efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 2, fordi det er begrænset til virksomheder, der opfylder disse kriterier.
This programme is therefore specific under Article 4(2) of the basic Regulation because it is limited to enterprises fulfilling these criteria.
Dette program er betinget af eksportresultater ifølge grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 4, litra a).
This programme is also contingent upon export performance according to Article 4(4)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Programmet er også regionalt specifikt efter artikel 4, stk. 3, da det er begrænset til virksomheder beliggende i et afgrænset geografisk område i det nordøstlige Kina.
The programme is also regionally specific within the terms of Article 4(3) as it is limited to enterprises located within the designated geographical region in the Northeast of China.
Den således fastsatte subsidiesats i UP for alle ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder er 0,43 %, hvilket svarer til satsen i ordningen for rentetilskud i forbindelse med eksport fastsat i US Decision Memorandum of 17 November 2008 on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe (Line Pipe) (side 23) (Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 227, side 70961 / 24. november 2008).
The subsidy rate thus established during the IP for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,43 % which corresponds to the rate for the export interest subsidies scheme as established in the US Decision Memorandum of 17 November 2008 on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe (Line Pipe) (Page No 23) (Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 227, page 70961 / 24 November 2008).
Med hensyn til de amerikanske myndigheders undersøgelser bemærkes det, at den metode, der er anvendt til at beregne fordelen ved tilsvarende programmer, i alt væsentligt er den samme som den, der anvendes af Unionen [85].
With regard to investigations conducted by the US authorities, it is noted that the methodology used for calculating the amount of benefit from similar programmes is substantially the same as that employed by the Union [85].
Eksportlån
Export loans
I klagen henvises der til det foregående program om rentetilskud i forbindelse med eksport, der alene er berettiget i forbindelse med udestående "eksportlån".
The complaint refers to the previous programme of export interest subsidies, which is eligible only in connection with outstanding "export loans".
De amerikanske myndigheder fastslog også i afgørelsen om Line Pipe, at dette program er udligningsberettiget.
The US authorities have found also this programme countervailable in the decision concerning Line Pipe.
Retsgrundlaget er provinsforvaltningen i Liaonings foranstaltninger vedrørende rentetilskud i forbindelse med eksport af højteknologiske produkter og produkter til fremstilling af udstyr, indført den 16. december 2004.
The legal basis is the "Provisional Administration Measures on High Tech Products and Equipment Manufacturing Products Export Financial interest Assistance of Liaoning Province", established on 16 December 2004.
Programmet giver en fordel i form af direkte overførsel af midler fra den kinesiske regering efter grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1, litra a), nr. i).
This programme constitutes a benefit in the form of direct transfer of funds from the GOC in the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Subsidierne giver en fordel under grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 2, og artikel 6, litra b), svarende til forskellen mellem det, modtagerne har betalt, og det beløb, de skulle have betalt for et sammenligneligt lån på kommercielle vilkår, hvis programmet ikke havde eksisteret.
The subsidy confers a benefit under Article 3(2) and 6(b) of the basic Regulation equal to the difference between what the recipients paid, and the amount they would have paid for a comparable commercial loan in the absence of the programme.
Lånene ydes af regeringen via dennes politisk styrede banker og statsejede banker (jf. analysen i betragtning 157-180).
These loans are provided by the government through its policy banks and its SOCBs (see analysis in recitals (157) - (180) above).
Disse eksportlån er specifikke efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 4, litra a), fordi de er betinget af eksportresultater, og ligeledes under artikel 4, stk. 3, da de er begrænset til virksomheder beliggende i et afgrænset geografisk område i Kina.
These export loans are specific under Article 4(4)(a) of the basic Regulation because they are contingent upon export performance and also under Article 4(3) as they are limited to enterprises located within a designated geographical region in China.
Den således fastsatte subsidiesats i UP for alle ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder er 1,05 %, hvilket svarer til det matematiske gennemsnit af satserne i ordningen for rentetilskud i forbindelse med eksport fastsat i US Decision Memorandum of 17 November 2008 on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe (Line Pipe) (side 23) (Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 227, side 70961 / 24. november 2008).
The subsidy rate thus established during the IP for all non-cooperating companies is set at 1,05 % which corresponds to arithmetical average of the rates for the export loans scheme as established in the US Decision Memorandum of 17 November 2008 on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe (Line Pipe) (Page No 23) (Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 227, page 70961 / 24 November 2008).
Med hensyn til de amerikanske myndigheders undersøgelser bemærkes det, at den metode, der er anvendt til at beregne fordelen ved tilsvarende programmer, i alt væsentligt er den samme som den, der anvendes af Unionen [86].
With regard to investigations conducted by the US authorities, it is noted that the methodology used for calculating the amount of benefit from similar programmes is substantially the same as that employed by the Union [86].
Liaoning-provinsens tilskud – programmet "Five Points, One Line Coastal Belt"
Liaoning Province Grants- Five Point One Line Programme
Det fremgik af klagen, at provinsregeringen i Liaoning indførte programmet "Five Points, One Line Coastal Belt" den 21. januar 2006.
The complaint states that the "Five Points, One Line Coastal Belt" programme was introduced on 21 January 2006 by the Liaoning Provincial Government.
Regeringen i Liaoning yder subsidier til bestemte virksomheder i området.
The Liaoning government provides subsidies for certain enterprises located in the area.
Førsteprioritet har virksomheder, der er etableret som eksportproduktionsbaser i de fem nøgleområder.
The first priority is given to enterprises set up in the five key areas as export manufacture bases.
Dette program er udligningsberettiget i henhold til de amerikanske myndigheders afgørelse om Line Pipe.
The US authorities have found this programme countervailable in the above-mentioned decision concerning Line Pipe.
Programmets retsgrundlag er en erklæring om provinsens tilskyndelse til udvikling i nøgleudviklingsområder ved kysten ("Opinion of Liaoning Provincial Encouraging the Expansion of Opening-Up in Coastal Key Developing Areas").
The legal basis of this programme is the "Opinion of Liaoning Provincial Encouraging the Expansion of Opening-Up in Coastal Key Developing Areas."
Liaonings udviklings- og reformudvalg og Liaonings finansmyndighed forvalter rentestøtten, og myndigheden for Huludao Beigangs industripark, erhvervsliv og handel administrerer gebyrfritagelser, der ydes under dette program.
The Liaoning Development and reform Commission and the Liaoning Finance Bureau manage the interest subsidies, and the Huludao Beigang Industrial Park, Industry, and Commerce Authority administer the fee exemptions provided under this programme.
Under programmet tilbydes der finansielle fordele i form af direkte overførsel af midler fra den kinesiske regering efter grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1, litra a), nr. i) og/eller indtægt, som staten giver afkald på, eller som ikke opkræves, efter grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1 litra a), nr. ii).
This programme provides financial advantages in the form of direct transfer of funds from the GOC in the terms of Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation and/or revenue forgone or not collected in the terms of Article 3(1)(a)(ii) of the basic Regulation.
Disse subsidier udgør en fordel efter grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 2, der svarer til subsidiebeløbet og/eller skatte-/afgiftsfritagelserne.
These subsidies constitute a benefit under Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation equal to the amount of the grant and/or to the tax/fee exemptions.
Subsidierne er specifikke efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 3, da de er begrænset til bestemte virksomheder i et nærmere bestemt geografisk område inden for den subsidieydende myndigheds jurisdiktion, nemlig provinsmyndigheden i Liaoning.
These subsidies are specific within the terms of Article 4(3) of the basic Regulation as they are limited to certain enterprises located within the designated jurisdiction of the Liaoning Provincial authority.
Førsteprioritet med hensyn til modtagelse af disse subsidier har virksomheder, der er etableret i fem nøgleområder som eksportproduktionsbaser, og den er derfor også specifik efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 4, litra a), for så vidt som den er betinget af eksportresultater.
The first priority for the granting of these subsidies is given to enterprises set up in the five key areas as export manufacture bases, and therefore they are also specific according to Article 4(4)(a) of the basic regulation insofar as they are contingent upon export performance.
Den således fastsatte subsidiesats i UP for alle ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder er 0,30 %, hvilket svarer til satsen i denne ordning fastsat i US Decision Memorandum of 17 November 2008 on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe (Line Pipe) (side 23) (Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 227, side 70961 / 24. november 2008).
The subsidy rate thus established during the IP for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,30 % which corresponds to the rate established for this scheme in the US Decision Memorandum of 17 November 2008 on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe (Line Pipe) (Page No 23) (Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 227, page 70961 / 24 November 2008).
Med hensyn til de amerikanske myndigheders undersøgelser bemærkes det, at den metode, der er anvendt til at beregne fordelen ved tilskudsprogrammer, i alt væsentligt er den samme som den, der anvendes af Unionen [87].
With regard to investigations conducted by the US authorities, it is noted that the methodology used for calculating the amount of benefit from grant programmes is substantially the same as that employed by the Union [87].
Retsgrundlaget for dette program er de administrative bestemmelser om Jiangsus public service-platform for forskning og teknologi (Sukeji (2006), nr. 102, Sucaijiao (2006) nr. 22).
The legal basis of this programme is the Administrative Measures on Jiangsu Sci-Tech Public Service Platform (Sukeji (2006) No 102; Sucaijiao (2006) No 22).
Det fremgår af klagen, at programmet bl.a. yder subsidier til bestemte virksomheder.
The complaint states that this programme provides, among others, grants to certain enterprises.
Den kinesiske regering anførte i sin besvarelse af spørgeskemaet, at ingen af virksomhederne i stikprøven anvendte eller havde fordel af programmet.
The Government of China stated in its questionnaire reply that no sampled company used or benefited under this programme.
Kommissionen henviser til sine argumenter om, at den kinesiske regering forventedes at afgive fuldstændige svar, også vedrørende virksomheder, der ikke indgik i stikprøven (betragtning 34-35 ovenfor).
The Commission refers to its arguments that the GOC was expected to provide complete replies also to questions concerning non-sampled companies (recitals (34) - (35) above).
Endvidere bemærker Kommissionen, at både virksomheder i stikprøven og andre producenter af stålprodukter, der er overtrukket med organisk materiale, der ikke indgik i stikprøven, men som var beliggende i det relevante område, var opført på listen over potentielle modtagere i klagen.
Furthermore, the Commission notes that the complaint lists as potential beneficiaries both companies that were sampled and other non-sampled OCS producers located in the relevant area of application.
Kommissionen baserer derfor i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 28 sine konklusioner på de bedste tilgængelige oplysninger i klagen og navnlig oplysningerne i klagen og de amerikanske myndigheders konklusion om, at programmet er udligningsberettiget, i afgørelsen om stålwirestrenge til forspændt beton med oprindelse i Kina [88].
The Commission therefore bases its findings on the facts available on record in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation, and in particular the information contained in the complaint and the findings by the US authorities that have countervailed this programme in the decision concerning Pre-Stressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the People's Republic of China [88].
Disse finansielle fordele i form af subsidier udgør et bidrag efter grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1, litra a), nr. i).
The financial advantages granted in the form of grants provide a contribution within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Subsidierne er specifikke efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 2, litra c), da der ikke ser ud til at være objektive kriterier eller betingelser vedrørende berettigelsen til fordelene ved denne ordning (jf. grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 2, litra b), og på grundlag af de foreliggende oplysninger ser det ikke ud til, at departementet for forskning og teknologi i Jiangsu udøver sine skønsbeføjelser på en objektiv måde.
These subsidies are specific within the terms of Article 4(2)(c) of the basic Regulation because, there seem to be no objective criteria or conditions governing the eligibility for the benefits from this scheme (as provided for in Article 4(2)(b) of the basic Regulation) and, on the basis of the facts available, discretion does not seem to be exercised by the Jiangsu Department of Science and Technology is an objective manner.
Den således fastsatte subsidiesats i UP for alle ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder er 0,01 %, hvilket svarer til satsen i denne ordning fastsat i US Decision Memorandum of 14 May 2010 on Pre-Stressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (side 35) (Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 98, side 28557 / 21. maj 2010).
The subsidy rate thus established during the IP for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,01 % which corresponds to the rate established for this scheme in the US Decision Memorandum of 14 May 2010 on Pre-Stressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (Page No 35) (Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 98, page 28557 / 21 May 2010).
Med hensyn til de amerikanske myndigheders undersøgelser bemærkes det, at den metode, der er anvendt til at beregne fordelen ved tilskudsprogrammer, i alt væsentligt er den samme som den, der anvendes af Unionen [89].
With regard to investigations conducted by the US authorities, it is noted that the methodology used for calculating the amount of benefit from grant programmes is substantially the same as that employed by the Union [89].
I klagen henvises der til to tilskud tildelt i 2009 under Hebei-provinsens forsknings- og teknologiprogram til en producent af stålprodukter, der er overtrukket med organisk materiale, på hhv. 700000 RMB og 2080000 RMB.
The complaint refers to two grants provided under the Science and Technology programme of Hebei province to an OCS producer in 2009 under this programme for an amount of RMB 700.000 and RMB 2.080.000.
Den kinesiske regering anførte i svaret på spørgeskemaet, at virksomheden i stikprøven ikke var etableret i Hebei, og at de ønskede oplysninger derfor ikke var af relevans for undersøgelsen.
The Government of China stated in its questionnaire reply that none of the sampled company was established in Hebei and therefore the requested information was irrelevant for the investigation.
Kommissionen henviser til sine argumenter om, at den kinesiske regering forventedes at afgive fuldstændige svar, også vedrørende virksomheder, der ikke indgik i stikprøven (betragtning 34-35 ovenfor).
The Commission refers to its arguments that the GOC should have provided complete replies also to questions concerning non-sampled companies (recitals (34) - (35) above).
Kommissionen baserer derfor i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 28 sine konklusioner på de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger (i denne sag klagen).
The Commission findings are therefore based on the facts available on record (in this case the complaint) in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
De finansielle fordele, der blev tildelt under dette program i form af tilskud, udgør subsidier, da de udgør et finansielt bidrag efter grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1, litra a), nr. i).
The financial advantages provided under this programme in the form of grants constitute subsidies given that they provide a financial contribution in the terms of Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation.
De udgør en fordel efter grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 2, der svarer til subsidiebeløbet.
They constitute a benefit under Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation equal to the amount of the grants.
De er specifikke efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 3, da de alene tildeles virksomheder beliggende i Hebei-provinsen.
These subsidies are specific according to Article 4(3) of the basic Regulation as they are provided only for companies located in the Hebei province.
Den således fastsatte subsidiesats for alle ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder er ubetydelig (under 0,01 %).
The subsidy rate thus established for all non-cooperating companies is negligible (less than 0,01 %).
AD HOC-SUBSIDIER
AD HOC SUBSIDIES
I klagen var anført en række tilfælde af ad hoc-subsidier, som angiveligt var tildelt visse producenter af stålprodukter, der er overtrukket med organisk materiale, både statsejede virksomheder og private virksomheder.
The complaint listed a number of ad hoc subsidies allegedly granted to certain OCS producers, both SOEs and private companies.
Disse subsidier tog enten form af tilskud eller andre skattefritagelser eller -lempelser og havde til formål at finansiere bestemte projekter eller aktiver.
These subsidies were either grants or other tax exemptions or reductions inter alia in order to finance particular projects or assets.
De blev tildelt inden for rammerne af den overordnede strategiske politik om modernisering af stålindustrien.
They were granted in the context of the general strategic policy to upgrade the steel industry.
Kommissionen bad den kinesiske regering afgive oplysninger om disse ad hoc-subsidier.
The Commission asked the GOC to provide information on these ad hoc subsidies.