natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Institutionerne skal derfor tage hensyn ikke kun til den dispositive del af dommen, men også til de præmisser, der førte til dommen, og som udgør dens grundlag, i det omfang de er nødvendige for at fastslå den nøjagtige betydning af den dispositive del [14].
The institutions are therefore required to have regard not only to the operative part of the judgment but also to the grounds which led to the judgment and constitute its essential basis, in so far as they are necessary to determine the exact meaning of what is stated in the operative part [14].
Proceduren for erstatning af en ulovlig foranstaltning kan derfor genoptages [15].
The procedure for replacing an illegal measure may thus be resumed [15].
Påstanden er derfor uberettiget.
Hence, this claim is also considered to be unwarranted.
Retten fandt — som også konstateret af Stepan og Huntman (jf. betragtning 19) — at institutionerne i løbet af den undersøgelse, der førte til vedtagelsen af den tredje udløbsundersøgelsesforordning, ikke kunne være kommet til den konklusion, at dumpingen var fortsat i NUP, eller at der var sandsynlighed for fortsat dumping.
The General Court, as also noted by Stepan and Hunstman (see recital 19), found that, during the investigation that resulted in the adoption of the third expiry review Regulation, the institutions could not have come to the conclusion that dumping had continued during the RIP, nor that there was a likelihood of continuation of dumping.
Størstedelen af importen fra USA — hvoraf mere end 85 % som bemærket af Retten var fra Dow Chemical — var kommet ind på EU-markedet til ikke-dumpingpriser.
The vast majority of imports from the USA namely, as the Court noted, more than 85 % from Dow Chemical, had entered the Union at non-dumped prices.
Desuden burde denne situation have resulteret i en konstatering af, at den vejede gennemsnitlige margen for importen af den pågældende vare med oprindelse i USA, var negativ.
Moreover, that situation should have resulted in a finding that the weighted average margin for imports of the product at issue originating in the USA was negative.
Retten konkluderede derfor, at institutionerne var forpligtet til at påvise, at der var sandsynlighed for fornyet dumping [16].
The Court concluded that the institutions were therefore obliged to demonstrate that there was a likelihood of a recurrence of dumping [16].
Analysen af sandsynligheden for fornyet dumping er i dette tilfælde, som anerkendt udtrykkeligt eller stiltiende af alle interesserede parter, knyttet til beregningen af den ledige produktionskapacitet i USA.
The analysis of the likelihood of the recurrence of dumping is in this case, as all interested parties recognise explicitly or implicitly, linked to the calculation of the spare production capacity in the USA.
Nogle interesserede parter har gjort gældende, at Retten har bekræftet, at der ikke var nogen ledig kapacitet af betydning i USA i NUP.
Some interested parties contend that the General Court confirmed that there was no significant spare capacity in the USA during the RIP.
Retten konstaterede, at den beregningsmetode, som resulterer i en ledig produktionskapacitet for ethanolamin på 60000 tons i NUP var forvirrende, og at den deraf følgende mængde på 60000 tons var i strid med det bevismateriale, som var blevet anvendt i sagen [17].
The Court found that the calculation methodology resulting in a spare production capacity of ethanolamines of 60000 tonnes during the RIP was confusing and that the resulting number of 60000 tonnes was in conflict with the evidence relied on in the case [17].
Som nævnt i betragtning 15 har EU-erhvervsgrenen gjort gældende, at der baseret på PCI-data landsdækkende ville være en ledig kapacitet på over 60000 tons i 2008.
As mentioned in recital 15, the Union industry has submitted that, based on PCI data, there would be a country-wide spare capacity in 2008 exceeding 60000 tonnes.
Det skal dog bemærkes, at USA's samlede produktionskapacitet — dvs. ikke justeret ned til 90 % heraf — var blevet anvendt i den beregning, som EU-erhvervsgrenen indgav.
It is however noted that, in the calculation submitted by the Union industry, the total US production capacity had been used, i.e. no downwards adjustment to 90 % thereof had been done.
Hvad angår påstandene vedrørende beregningen af den ledige kapacitet i NUP skal det bemærkes, at to eksporterende producenter udviste samarbejdsvilje i forbindelse med den tredje udløbsundersøgelse.
As regards the allegations regarding the calculation of the spare capacity during the RIP, it is noted that two exporting producers cooperated with the third expiry review investigation.
I løbet af denne undersøgelse blev det fastslået, at INEOS Oxide LLC (»INEOS«) ikke havde nogen ledig kapacitet i NUP, mens Dow Chemical havde nogen ledig kapacitet.
During that investigation, it was established that INEOS Oxide LLC (‘INEOS’) did not have any spare capacity during the RIP, whereas Dow Chemical had some.
De efterprøvede oplysninger viser, at Dow Chemical ikke udnyttede denne ledige kapacitet til lavpriseksport i NUP, selv om virksomheden kunne have gjort dette i betragtning af foranstaltningernes lave niveau udtrykt som ad valorem-ækvivalenter.
The verified information shows that Dow Chemical did not use its spare capacity to engage in low-price exports during the RIP although it could have done so given the low level of the measures when expressed at an ad valorem equivalent.
Desuden tegnede de samarbejdsvillige selskaber, Dow Chemical og INEOS, i NUP sig tilsammen for 91,6 % af eksporten fra USA til Unionen.
Moreover, the cooperating companies, Dow Chemical and INEOS, represented during the RIP together 91,6 % of exports from the US into the Union.
Den samlede eksport fra Dow Chemical og INEOS udgjorde 30000-35000 tons;
The total exports of Dow Chemical and INEOS amounted to 30000-35000 tonnes;
eksporten fra ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder oversteg ikke 3000-4000 tons.
exports from non-cooperating companies were not more than 3000-4000 tonnes.
Den landsdækkende dumpingmargen i NUP var på bagatelniveau, og importen fra ikke-samarbejdsvillige selskaber udgjorde mindre end 1 % af EU-markedet.
The country-wide dumping margin during the RIP was de minimis and imports from non-cooperating companies represented less than 1 % of the Union market.
Af fortrolighedshensyn har ovenstående tal form af intervaller, eller der er ikke tale om nøjagtige tal.
For confidentiality reasons the above figures have either been given in the form of ranges or are not exact.
Disse omstændigheder anerkendes også af EU-erhvervsgrenen.
Those circumstances are also acknowledged by the Union industry.
Det bør imidlertid bemærkes, at der som nævnt i betragtning 30 og 31, i betragtning af foranstaltningernes lave niveau og den manglende ledige kapacitet hos INEOS samt fraværet af dumping for Dow Chemical, intet er, der tyder på, at en ophævelse af foranstaltningen vil ændre situationen.
However, it should be noted that as mentioned in recitals 30 and 31, given the low level of the measures and the lack of spare capacity from INEOS as well as the absence of dumping from Dow Chemical, there is no indication that the repeal of the measure would be likely to change the situation.
En eksporterende producent fremførte, at den tredje udløbsundersøgelse ikke burde have udmundet i, at der med gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 54/2010 indførtes foranstaltninger.
An exporting producer commented that the third expiry review should not have concluded with Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 imposing measures.
Den eksporterende producent anmodede om, at foranstaltningerne ophæves med tilbagevirkende kraft, således at al told, der er betalt siden datoen for ikrafttrædelsen af gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 54/2010 tilbagebetales til alle de importører, der behørigt har betalt den.
The exporting producer requested that measures be repealed with retroactive effect so that all duties paid since the date of entry into force of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 be reimbursed to all importers who duly paid them.
Denne påstand afvises, da andre eksporterende producenter end Dow Chemical også kunne have anlagt sag med påstand om annullation af den forordning, som kun blev annulleret for så vidt angik ansøgeren Dow Chemical.
That claim is rejected, as exporting producers other than Dow Chemical could also have brought an action for annulment against the Regulation — which was annulled only in so far as it concerned the applicant, Dow Chemical.
Ifølge princippet om retssikkerhed og efter Domstolens praksis [18] blev forordningen endelig for så vidt angår andre eksporterende producenter.
Therefore, according to the principle of legal certainty and following the case-law of the Court [18], the Regulation became definitive as regards the other exporting producers.
I betragtning af de bemærkninger, der blev fremsat af parter, og analyserne heraf, konkluderedes det, at gennemførelsen af dommen betyder, at institutionerne i forbindelse med den undersøgelse, der førte til vedtagelsen af gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 54/2010, ikke kunne være kommet til den konklusion, at dumpingen var fortsat i NUP, eller at der var sandsynlighed for fortsat dumping.
Taking account of the comments made by parties and the analysis thereof, it was concluded that the implementation of the Judgment implies that during the investigation that resulted in the adoption of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010, the institutions could not have come to the conclusion that dumping had continued during the RIP, nor that there was a likelihood of continuation of dumping.
Endvidere burde institutionerne også have konkluderet, at det ikke var sandsynligt, at der igen ville forekomme dumping.
Moreover, the institutions should also have concluded that there was no likelihood of recurrence of dumping.
På grundlag af ovenstående burde antidumpingtolden på ethanolamin ikke være blevet genindført.
On the basis of the above, the anti-dumping duty on ethanolamines should not have been reintroduced.
Med hensyn til Dow Chemical skal det erindres, at gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 54/2010 allerede er blevet annulleret, for så vidt angår Dow Chemical, ved Rettens dom i sag T-158/10.
With respect to Dow Chemical, it should be recalled that Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 has already been annulled in so far as Dow Chemical is concerned by the judgment of the General Court in case T-158/10.
Af klarhedshensyn skal det derfor bemærkes, at antidumpingtolden for så vidt angår importen af ethanolamin fra Dow Chemical ikke er i kraft fra datoen for ikrafttrædelsen af gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 54/2010 (den 23. januar 2010).
Therefore, for the sake of clarity, it should be pointed out that, with regard to imports of ethanolamines from Dow Chemical, the anti-dumping duties are no longer in force as of the date of entry into force of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 (23 January 2010).
FJERDE UDLØBSUNDERSØGELSE
FOURTH EXPIRY REVIEW
I lyset af ovenstående og navnlig betragtning 35 konkluderes det, at den fjerde udløbsundersøgelse, bør afsluttes uden at genindføre told.
In light of the above, and recital 35 in particular, it is considered that the fourth expiry review should be terminated without reimposing a duty.
Med hensyn til Dow Chemical bortfaldt den fjerde udløbsundersøgelses formål med dommen, og der er fra den 23. januar 2010 intet retsgrundlag for opkrævning af antidumpingtold på importen fra Dow Chemical.
With regard to Dow Chemical, the fourth expiry review was deprived of its object by the Judgment and no legal basis exists for the collection of anti-dumping duties on imports from Dow Chemical as of 23 January 2010.
DELVIS INTERIMSUNDERSØGELSE
PARTIAL INTERIM REVIEW
I betragtning af de undersøgelsesresultater, der er opsummeret i betragtning 35, konkluderes det, at den fornyede undersøgelse burde afsluttes, da grundlaget for foranstaltninger, dvs. en konklusion om sandsynlighed for, at der fortsat eller igen vil finde skadevoldende dumping sted, mangler.
Taking account of the findings summarised in recital 35 above, it is considered that the review should be terminated, since the basis for the very existence of the measures, i.e., a finding of a likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping, is missing.
MODTAGNE BEMÆRKNINGER
COMMENTS RECEIVED
De fik også en frist, inden for hvilken de kunne fremsætte bemærkninger til fremlæggelsen af oplysninger.
They were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to that disclosure.
Deres bemærkninger blev behørigt taget i betragtning, men var ikke af en sådan karakter, at de kunne ændre ved ovennævnte konklusioner.
Their comments were duly considered, but were not such as to change the conclusions.
Det følger af ovenstående, at den delvist genoptagne undersøgelse bør afsluttes, og at antidumpingforanstaltningerne på importen af ethanolamin med oprindelse i USA bør ophæves.
It follows from the above that the partial reopening investigation should be terminated and that the anti-dumping measures on imports of ethanolamines originating in the USA should be repealed.
Da gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 54/2010 allerede var blevet annulleret for så vidt angår Dow Chemical, er foranstaltningerne ikke i kraft på datoen for ikrafttrædelsen af gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 54/2010 (den 23. januar 2010).
With respect to imports of ethanolamines from Dow Chemical, since Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 had already been annulled in so far as Dow Chemical is concerned, the measures are not in force as of the date of entry into force of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 (23 January 2010).
Den fjerde udløbsundersøgelse vedrørende gældende antidumpingtold på importen af ethanolamin med oprindelse i USA bør afsluttes uden at genindføre told.
The fourth expiry investigation concerning anti-dumping duties in force on imports of ethanolamines originating in the USA should also be terminated without reimposing a duty.
Med hensyn til importen fra Dow Chemical er den udløbsundersøgelses formål bortfaldet.
With respect to imports from Dow Chemical, that expiry review has been deprived of its object.
Den delvise interimsundersøgelse, der var begrænset til en undersøgelse af dumping, bør afsluttes, da de gældende foranstaltninger er blevet ophævet —
The partial interim review limited in scope to the examination of dumping should be terminated on the basis of the repeal of the existing measures,
Den delvist genoptagne antidumpingundersøgelse vedrørende importen af ethanolamin, i øjeblikket henhørende under KN-kode ex29221100 (monoethanolamin) (Taric-kode 2922110010), ex29221200 (diethanolamin) (Taric-kode 2922120010) og 29221310 (triethanolamin) med oprindelse i Amerikas Forenede Stater afsluttes uden at genindføre told, og foranstaltningerne ophæves.
The partial reopening of the anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of ethanolamines currently falling within CN codes ex29221100 (monoethanolamine) (TARIC code 2922110010), ex29221200 (diethanolamine) (TARIC code 2922120010) and 29221310 (triethanolamine), originating in the United States of America is hereby terminated without reimposing the duties, and measures are repealed.
Med hensyn til importen fra Dow Chemical Company er der fra den 23. januar 2010 intet retsgrundlag for opkrævning af antidumpingtold på importen fra Dow Chemical Company.
With respect to imports from The Dow Chemical Company, no legal basis exists for the collection of anti-dumping duties on imports from The Dow Chemical Company as of 23 January 2010.
Udløbsundersøgelsen af antidumpingundersøgelsen vedrørende importen af ethanolamin fra alle eksporterende producenter, i øjeblikket henhørende under KN-kode ex29221100 (monoethanolamin) (Taric-kode 2922110010), ex29221200 (diethanolamin) (Taric-kode 2922120010) og 29221310 (triethanolamin), med oprindelse i Amerikas Forenede Stater, der blev indledt den 21. januar 2012, afsluttes, uden at der indføres foranstaltninger.
The expiry review investigation of the anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of ethanolamines from all exporting producers, currently falling within CN codes ex29221100 (monoethanolamine) (TARIC code 2922110010), ex29221200 (diethanolamine) (TARIC code 2922120010) and 29221310 (triethanolamine), originating in the United States of America, initiated on 21 January 2012, is hereby terminated without imposition of measures.
Med hensyn til importen fra Dow Chemical er den udløbsundersøgelses formål bortfaldet.
With respect to imports from The Dow Chemical Company, that expiry review has been deprived of its object.
Den delvise interimsundersøgelse, der er afgrænset til en undersøgelse af dumping for så vidt angår importen af ethanolamin fra Dow Chemical Company, i øjeblikket henhørende under KN-kode ex29221100 (monoethanolamin) (Taric-kode 2922110010), ex29221200 (diethanolamin) (Taric-kode 2922120010) og 29221310 (triethanolamin), med oprindelse i Amerikas Forenede Stater, afsluttes.
The partial interim review limited in scope to the examination of dumping concerning imports of ethanolamines from The Dow Chemical Company currently falling within CN codes ex29221100 (monoethanolamine) (TARIC code 2922110010), ex29221200 (diethanolamine) (TARIC code 2922120010) and 29221310 (triethanolamine), originating in the United States of America is hereby terminated.
EUT L 17 af 22.1.2010, s. 1.
OJ L 17, 22.1.2010, p. 1.
EUT C 79 af 12.3.2011, s. 20.
OJ C 79, 12.3.2011, p. 20.
EUT C 18 af 21.1.2012, s. 16.
OJ C 18, 21.1.2012, p. 16.
EUT C 103 af 11.4.2012, s. 8.
OJ C 103, 11.4.2012, p. 8.
EUT C 161 af 9.4.2010, s. 44.
OJ C 161, 9.4.2010, p. 44.
Sag T-158/10, The Dow Chemical Company mod Rådet, Sml. 2012 II.
Case T-158/10 The Dow Chemical Company v Council [2012] ECR II.
EUT C 314 af 18.10.2012, s. 12.
OJ C 314, 18.10.2012, p. 12.
Sag C-458/98 P, Industrie des Poudres Sphériques (IPS) mod Rådet, præmis 81.
Case C-458/98 P Industrie des Poudres Sphériques v Council, paragraph 81.
Sag C-458/98 P, Industrie des Poudres Sphériques (IPS) mod Rådet, præmis 82.
Case C-458/98 P Industrie des Poudres Sphériques v Council, paragraph 82.
Sag T-158/10, The Dow Chemical Company mod Rådet, præmis 45.
Case T-158/10 The Dow Chemical Company v Council, paragraph 45.
Sag T-158/10, The Dow Chemical Company mod Rådet, præmis 54.
Case T-158/10 The Dow Chemical Company v Council, paragraph 54.
Sag C-239/99, Nachi Europe GmbH mod Hauptzollamt Krefeld, Sml. 2001 I, s. 1197.
Case C-239/99 Nachi Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld [2001] ECR I-1220.
Som nævnt i betragtning 16 henviste EU-erhvervsgrenen til forskellige faktorer, der tydede på, at der stadig var sandsynlighed for fornyet dumping efter 2008.
As mentioned in recital 16, the Union industry referred to various factors which would indicate that, according to them, there was still a likelihood of a recurrence of dumping after 2008.
Men markedsvilkårene har ikke ændret sig væsentligt siden offentliggørelsen af den tredje udløbsundersøgelsesforordning.
However, market conditions have not changed materially since the publication of the third expiry review Regulation.
Chemical Economics Handbook Product Review, »Ethanolamin«, SRI Consulting.
Chemical Economics Handbook Product Review, ‘Ethanolamines’, SRI Consulting.
Den 2. februar 1994 indførte Rådet ved forordning (EF) nr. 229/94 [2] (»den oprindelige forordning«) en endelig antidumpingtold på importen af ethanolamin (»den pågældende vare«) med oprindelse i Amerikas Forenede Stater (»USA«). Den 20. juli 2000 og efter en udløbsundersøgelse blev disse foranstaltninger forlænget med fem år ved Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1603/2000 [3] (»den første udløbsundersøgelsesforordning«).
On 2 February 1994, the Council imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 229/94 [2] (‘the original Regulation’), definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of ethanolamines (‘product concerned’) originating in the United States of America (‘USA’). On 20 July 2000 and following an expiry review investigation, these measures were extended for five years by Council Regulation (EC) No 1603/2000 [3] (the ‘first expiry review Regulation’).
ved at konstatere fortsat dumping i NUP og derfor på dette grundlag at konstatere sandsynlighed for fortsat dumping og ii) at det fastslås, at den overskydende kapacitet til produktion af ethanolamin i USA beløb sig til 60000 tons.
a finding of continued dumping during RIP and, therefore, on that basis, a finding of a likelihood of continuation of dumping; and (ii) the determination that the spare production capacity of ethanolamines in the United States amounted to 60000 tonnes.
En bruger i Unionen, Stepan Europa (»Stepan«), fremførte, at den retlige konsekvens af dommen kun kunne være, at de foranstaltninger, der er indført ved den tredje udløbsundersøgelsesforordning bør inddrages, da de blev indført på grundlag af en fejlagtig analyse. Den eksporterende producent Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation LLC (»Huntsman«) gav udtryk for samme holdning. Stepan og Huntsman fremførte, at Domstolen havde fastslået, at den landsdækkende dumpingmargen i NUP var negativ, og at der derfor ikke kunne konstateres fortsat dumping. Stepan fandt derfor, at institutionerne burde have undersøgt, om der var en sandsynlighed for fornyet dumping, men den tredje udløbsundersøgelsesforordning indeholdt intet herom.
A user in the Union, Stepan Europe (‘Stepan’), submitted that the legal consequence of the judgment could only be that the measures imposed by the third expiry review Regulation should be withdrawn as they had been imposed on the basis of an erroneous analysis. Similar views were expressed by the exporting producer Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation LLC (‘Huntsman’). Indeed, Stepan and Huntsman argued that the Court held that, during the RIP, the country-wide dumping margin was negative and therefore no continuation of dumping could be established. Stepan considered that the institutions should hence have examined if there was a likelihood of recurrence of dumping; yet the third expiry review Regulation had been silent on this.
Kommissionens gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 286/2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 286/2013
om overgangsforanstaltninger for samhandelen med landbrugsprodukter som følge af Kroatiens tiltrædelse
on transitional measures to be adopted in respect of trade in agricultural products on the occasion of the accession of Croatia
under henvisning til akten om Kroatiens tiltrædelse, særlig artikel 41, og
Having regard to the Act of Accession of Croatia, and in particular Article 41 thereof,
Der bør vedtages overgangsforanstaltninger for at forebygge omlægning af samhandelen i forbindelse med de fælles markedsordninger for landbrugsprodukter som følge af Kroatiens tiltrædelse af Den Europæiske Union den 1. juli 2013.
Transitional measures should be adopted in order to avoid the risk of deflection of trade, affecting the common organisation of agricultural markets due to the accession of Croatia to the European Union on 1 July 2013.
Handelsomlægninger, der vil kunne forstyrre markedsordningerne, omfatter ofte produkter, der kunstigt flyttes med henblik på at udnytte udvidelsen af Den Europæiske Union og ikke indgår i den pågældende tiltrædende stats normale lagre.
Trade deflections liable to disrupt the market organisations often involve products moved artificially with a view to benefit from enlargement of the Union and do not form part of the normal stocks of the acceding State concerned.
Ophobningen af sådanne overskudsmængder kan også resultere i en fordrejning af konkurrencen til skade for en velfungerende fælles markedsordning.
Accumulation of such surplus quantities can also give rise to distortion of competition likely to affect the proper functioning of the common organisation of the markets.