natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Undersøgelsen viste ydermere, at faldet i priserne på polysilicium i den betragtede periode var afspejlet i de stikprøveudvalgte EU-producenters gennemsnitlige produktionsomkostninger for celler og moduler, som faldt i samme takt som polysiliciumpriserne.
Moreover, the investigation showed that the decrease of polysilicon prices over the period considered was reflected in the average cost of production of cells and modules of the sampled Union industry which decreased to a similar degree than the polysilicon prices.
En interesseret part rejste tvivl om virkningen af de påståede sanktioner, som EU-erhvervsgrenen måtte betale som følge af genforhandling af leverandørkontrakterne.
One interested party questioned the impact of alleged penalties that the Union industry had to pay due to the re-negotiation of the supplier contracts.
Det kan i den forbindelse ikke udelukkes, at visse producenter skulle betale sanktioner for annullering af leverandørkontrakter vedrørende wafere i den betragtede periode.
In this regard, it cannot be excluded that some producers may have had to pay penalties for the cancellation of wafers supply contracts during the period considered.
Kommissionen fandt dog ingen beviser for, at disse sanktioner kunne have haft en virkning på EU-erhvervsgrenens situation som helhed eller kunne være repræsentative.
However, the Commission did not find any evidence that these penalties could have had an effect on the situation of the Union industry as a whole or would be representative.
Mens det kan derfor ikke helt udelukkes, at sanktioner kunne have haft en vis negativ virkning på et begrænset antal EU-producenter, er den samlede indvirkning på EU-erhvervsgrenen i bedste fald marginal og kunne derfor ikke bryde årsagssammenhængen mellem den subsidierede import og den væsentlige skade, der er påført hele EU-erhvervsgrenen.
While it can therefore not be completely excluded that penalties could have had a certain negative impact on limited number of Union producers, the overall impact on the Union industry is at best marginal and hence could not break the causal link between the subsidised imports and the material injury suffered by the whole Union industry.
En anden interesseret part påstod, at faldet i salgspriserne på den undersøgte vare i Unionen til dels skyldtes faldet i priserne på polysilicium.
Another interested party claimed that the decrease of sales prices of the product under investigation in the Union is partly due to the reduction in the price of polysilicon.
Det skal dog i den forbindelse bemærkes, at undersøgelsen viste, at importen fra Kina var subsidieret og i væsentlig grad underbød EU-erhvervsgrenens priser.
However, in this regard, it should be noted that the investigation showed that the imports from the PRC were subsidised and substantially undercutting the prices of the Union industry.
Prisfaldet er derfor større end den besparelse i produktionsomkostningerne, der kan forklares ved et fald i råvarepriserne.
The price decrease therefore goes beyond the reduction in production costs that can be explained by the decrease in the raw material prices.
Hvis prisfaldet udelukkende skyldtes virkningen af faldet i råvarepriserne, ville EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke have været tvunget til at sænke sine salgspriser til et niveau under produktionsomkostningerne.
If the price decrease was merely the effect of the decrease of the raw material prices, the Union industry would not have been forced to decrease their sales prices below their cost of production.
Denne påstand afvises derfor.
Therefore, this claim has to be rejected.
En anden interesseret part gentog, at en af EU-producenternes tvister efter UP kan have påvirket situationen i hvert fald for denne EU-producent allerede i UP.
Another interested party reiterated that the litigation of one Union producer after the IP may has affected the situation of at least this Union producer already during the IP.
Parten uddybede imidlertid ikke, hvordan og i hvilket omfang denne begivenhed efter UP egentlig kunne have haft en virkning på denne producents situation i UP.
This party did not explain however how and to what extend such event that occurred after the IP could indeed have had an effect on this producer's situation during the IP.
Der blev som led i undersøgelsen heller ikke fundet beviser for disse virkninger.
Likewise, the investigation did not reveal any evidence showing such effects.
Samme interesserede part rejste desuden tvivl om ovennævnte konklusioner, da der angiveligt ikke var fremlagt beviser herfor.
Moreover, the same interested party questioned the above mentioned findings, as allegedly no evidence was shown.
Konklusionerne i undersøgelsen var imidlertid baseret på faktiske oplysninger og positivt bevismateriale, hvoraf der er fremlagt ikkefortrolige versioner for alle interesserede parter.
However, the findings of the investigation were based on facts and positive evidence, non-confidential versions of which were available to all interested parties.
Ud fra ovenstående konkluderes det, at EU-erhvervsgrenen generelt ikke led skade af disse langtidskontrakter og var i stand til fuldt ud at udnytte prisfaldet i råvarepriserne, selv om visse specifikke EU-producenter kan have været påvirket af langtidskontrakter om leverance af polysilicium.
On the basis of the above, it is concluded that even if some specific Union producers may have been affected by long term contracts, the Union industry, overall, did not suffer from these long term contracts and was able to fully benefit from the price decrease in raw material prices.
Det blev derfor konkluderet, at langtidskontrakterne ikke var af et sådant omfang, at de kunne bryde årsagssammenhængen mellem den subsidierede import og den væsentlige skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen blev påført.
The long term contracts were therefore not found to break the causal link between the subsisdised imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Selvforskyldt skade: indvirkning af EU-erhvervsgrenens automatisering, størrelse, stordriftsfordele, konsolidering, innovation, omkostningseffektivitet og import
Self-inflicted injury: impact of automation, size, economies of scale, consolidation, innovation, cost efficiency, imports of the Union industry
Det blev påstået, at mindre producenter var dårligere stillet end store vertikalt integrerede producenter, og at disse mindre producenters eventuelle skade derfor ikke kunne tilskrives den subsidierede import.
It was claimed that the small-scale producers had a disadvantage compared to the larger vertically integrated producers and therefore any injury suffered by the small scale producers cannot be attributed to the subsidised imports.
De fleste EU-producenter har specialiseret sig i en del af produktionsprocessen (celler eller moduler), hvorved de øgede deres konkurrenceevne for den specifikke varetype, som de producerer.
Most Union producers have specialised in one part of the production process (cells or modules), which, through specialisation, increased their competitiveness with regard to the specific product type they were producing.
En række interesserede parter påstod, at prispresset resulterede i en konsolidering af EU-erhvervsgrenen og den kinesiske erhvervsgren, hvilket var årsagen til, at EU-erhvervsgrenen forvoldtes væsentlig skade.
Some interested parties claimed that the price pressure resulted in the consolidation of the Union industry and the Chinese industry, the latter being the cause of the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Undersøgelsen viste dog, at konsolideringen snarere var en konsekvens af den subsidierede import og af urimelig handelspraksis.
However, the investigation showed that the consolidation was rather a consequence of the subsidised imports and the unfair trade practices.
Under normale markedsforhold har vertikalt integrerede producenter generelt større sikkerhed i forhold til deres forsyningskæde.
In general the vertically integrated producers in normal market conditions should have more security over their supply chain.
Det fremgik dog af undersøgelsen, at fordelen ved vertikal integration for den del af EU-erhvervsgrenen, der var vertikalt integreret, ikke kunne udnyttes fuldt ud, idet prispresset fra den subsidierede import var ekstremt stort.
However, the investigation showed that the advantage of vertical integration by part of the Union industry that was vertically integrated could not be fully exploited as the price pressure from subsidised imports was extremely high.
Som følge af den subsidierede import var EU-erhvervsgrenen og selv de vertikalt integrerede EU-producenter ikke i stand til fuldt ud at drage fordel af den høje kapacitetsudnyttelse til at opnå stordriftsfordele.
Moreover, the Union industry, even the vertically integrated Union producers, due to the subsidized imports could not fully benefit from high capacity utilisation rates to achieve economies of scale.
Desuden viste undersøgelsen intet sammenfald mellem vertikal integration og bedre rentabilitet, idet det høje prispres havde fordrejet dette sammenfald.
Furthermore, the investigation did not reveal any correlation between vertical integration and better profitability rates, as the high price pressure has altered this correlation.
Derimod viste undersøgelsen, at hovedparten af EU-erhvervsgrenens investeringer var beregnet til nye maskiner og FoU, og at der ikke er nogen relevante forskelle i teknologi mellem varerne på verdensplan.
To the contrary, the investigation showed that the majority of the investments made by the Union industry were dedicated to new machinery and R&D and that there are no meaningful differences in technology between the products world-wide.
Det skal i den forbindelse bemærkes, at dette argument ikke blev dokumenteret.
In this respect, it should be noted that the argument was not substantiated.
Desuden kunne et mislykket projekt snarere betragtes som en følge af den subsidierede import.
In addition, any failed project could rather be considered as a consequence of the subsidised imports.
En række interesserede parter påstod, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke var i stand til at rationalisere sine omkostninger i tide for at imødegå udviklingerne på verdensmarkedet.
Several interested parties claimed that the Union industry was not able to rationalize its costs in time to respond to the developments in the world market.
Andre parter påstod, at arbejdskraftomkostningerne og de generelle omkostninger er højere i Unionen end i Kina.
Other parties claimed that labour and overhead costs are higher in the Union than in the PRC.
Undersøgelsen viste, at EU-erhvervsgrenens produktionsomkostninger var konstant faldende i den betragtede periode.
The investigation showed that the cost of production of the Union industry was steadily decreasing during the period considered.
Produktiviteten steg for moduler og celler.
Productivity increased for modules and cells.
Som nævnt ovenfor var EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke i stand til at udnytte de lavere omkostninger på grund af stigningen i den subsidierede import fra Kina og det deraf følgende voldsomme prispres på EU-markedet.
As mentioned above, due to the surge of subsidised imports from the PRC and the consequent significant price pressure on the Union market, the Union industry was not able to benefit from the reductions in cost.
Det skal bemærkes, at de eksporterende producenter i Kina ikke har sammenlignelige fordele hvad angår råvarer (polysilicium) og de maskiner, der anvendes, da begge dele i overvejende grad importeredes fra Unionen.
It is noted that the exporting producers in the PRC do not enjoy any comparative advantage with regard to raw materials (polysilicon) and the machinery used as both were mostly imported from the Union.
Hvad angår arbejdskraftomkostningerne og generalomkostningerne, herunder afskrivninger, udgjorde de i gennemsnit mindre end 10 % af de samlede omkostninger for et modul i UP, og det konkluderes, at de ikke spillede en væsentlig rolle.
As far as labour and overhead costs, including depreciation are concerned, they represented on average less than 10 % of the total cost of a module in the IP and are not considered to have played any significant role.
Hvad angår elektricitetsomkostningerne, udgjorde de i gennemsnit mindre end 1 % af de samlede omkostninger for et modul i UP, og det konkluderes, at de ikke spillede en væsentlig rolle.
As far as electricity costs are concerned, they represented on average less than 1 % of the total cost of a module in the IP and are not considered to have played any significant role.
Det blev endvidere påstået, at visse EU-producenter købte celler og/eller moduler fra det pågældende land og videresolgte disse varer på EU-markedet som deres egne varer.
Moreover, it was claimed that some Union producers sourced cells and/or modules from the country concerned, and re-sold those products on the Union market as their own.
Skaden som følge af disse transaktioner bør ikke tilskrives den subsidierede import.
Injury resulting from these transactions should not be attributed to the subsidized imports.
Undersøgelsen viste imidlertid, at EU-erhvervsgrenens import af den pågældende vare var komplementær, hvad angår typer, og begrænset i mængde i forhold til den samlede EU-produktion, og derfor ville den eventuelle virkning heraf kun være marginal, og det kan ikke antages, at den bryder årsagssammenhængen mellem den subsidierede import og den skade, der forvoldtes EU-erhvervsgrenen.
However, the investigation revealed that imports from the Union industry of the product concerned were complementary in nature as well as limited in terms of volume when compared to the total Union production and therefore their effect, if any would only be marginal and could not be considered breaking the causal link between the subsidized imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
For at modsvare den faldende pristendens i importen fra Kina måtte EU-erhvervsgrenen derfor gøre sig store bestræbelser for at rationalisere produktionsomkostningerne.
Therefore, in order to match the decreasing price trend of the imports from the PRC, the Union industry had to make considerable efforts to rationalize its cost of production.
Til trods for EU-erhvervsgrenens bestræbelser kunne denne omkostningsrationalisering ikke afspejles i salgspriserne som følge af det markante underbud fra den subsidierede import.
Despite the efforts of the Union industry, this cost rationalization could not be reflected in the sales price due to the significant undercutting exerted by the subsidised imports.
Visse interesserede parter påstod, at den skade, EU-erhvervsgrenen forvoldtes, skyldtes EU-erhvervsgrenens mangel på tilstrækkelige stordriftsfordele.
Certain interested party claimed that the injury suffered by the Union industry was due to the Union industry's lack of sufficient economies of scale.
Det blev påstået, at mindre producenter var dårligere stillet end store vertikalt integrerede producenter, og at disse producenters eventuelle skade derfor ikke kunne tilskrives den subsidierede import.
It was argued that small-scale producers had a disadvantage compared to larger vertically integrated producers and therefore any injury suffered by these producers cannot be attributed to the subsidised imports.
En anden interesseret part fremførte, at automatisering af produktionsprocessen er omkostningskrævende, og at stordriftsfordele derfor er endnu vigtigere for at kunne reducere produktionsomkostningerne.
Another interested party argued that the automation of the production process is costly and that therefore economies of scale are even more important to reduce the cost of production.
Undersøgelsen viste, at som følge af den subsidierede import var EU-erhvervsgrenen og selv de store og vertikalt integrerede EU-producenter ikke i stand til fuldt ud at drage fordel af den høje kapacitetsudnyttelse til at opnå stordriftsfordele.
The investigation showed that the Union industry, even the larger and vertically integrated ones, due to the subsidised imports, could not fully benefit from high capacity utilization rates to achieve economies of scale.
Under alle omstændigheder viste undersøgelsen intet sammenfald mellem størrelsen, vertikal integration og bedre rentabilitet, idet det høje prispres fra den subsidierede import fordrejede dette sammenfald.
In any event, the investigation did not reveal any correlation between size, vertical integration and better profitability rates, as the high price pressure from subsidised imports has altered this correlation.
Undersøgelsen har vist, at fordelen ved stordriftsfordele ikke længere eksisterede på et marked, hvor udnyttelsesgraden var lav, hvilket også var tilfældet for de kinesiske producenter.
The investigation has showed that the benefit of economies of scale no longer existed in a market where the utilization rates were low, which was also true for the Chinese producers.
Endvidere hævdede en interesseret part, at investorer og banker ikke vil finansiere projekter, hvis modulfabrikanten er for lille, idet større producenter giver bedre garantier og er mere solide (»bankable«).
Furthermore, one interested party claimed that investors and banks would not finance projects if the module manufacturer is too small, as larger producers provide better guarantees and are more ‘bankable’.
Med andre ord er investorer og banker tilbageholdende med at finansiere solenergiprojekter med moduler, der er produceret i Unionen.
In other terms, investors and banks are reluctant to finance PV related projects using modules produced in the Union.
Undersøgelsen viste dog, at eventuelle præferencer blandt investorer og banker til at finansiere kinesiske producenter med større produktionskapacitet skyldes den fordrejning, som den subsidierede import har skabt på EU-markedet.
However, the investigation showed that any possible preference of investors and banks to finance Chinese producers which have larger production capacities is the result of the distortion that subsidised imports have created on the Union market.
Som nævnt ovenfor er størrelsen af produktionslinjerne ikke afgørende, hvis udnyttelsesgraden fortsat er lav.
As mentioned above, the size of the production lines does not play a role if utilisation rates remain low.
Dette argument blev derfor afvist.
Therefore, this argument was dismissed
En interesseret part påstod, at EU-erhvervsgrenen havde en negativ omkostningsstruktur sammenlignet med de kinesiske konkurrenters, da sidstnævnte havde lavere arbejdskraftomkostninger, elektricitets- og afskrivningsomkostninger, og desuden havde det nyeste udstyr.
One interested party claimed that the Union industry had an unfavourable cost structure compared to its Chinese competitors, as the latter enjoyed lower labour, electricity and depreciation costs, and in addition had the newest equipment.
Den pågældende part var ikke i stand til at fremlægge nye oplysninger eller dokumentation, som kunne ændre undersøgelsens konklusioner i denne henseende.
However, the party concerned was unable to provide new information or supporting evidence that could reverse the findings of this investigation in this regard.
Påstanden om, at de kinesiske producenter bruger det nyeste udstyr, blev behandlet i konklusionerne i betragtning 203 i forordningen om midlertidig told, hvori det hedder, at de eksporterende producenter i Kina ikke havde nogen komparativ fordel, navnlig fordi maskiner og udstyr blev importeret fra Den Europæiske Union.
In particular, the claim that the Chinese producers were using the newest equipment was addressed by the findings in recital (203) to the Provisional anti-dumping Regulation, stating that the exporting producers in the PRC did not enjoy any comparative advantage, in particular because machinery and equipment was imported from the European Union.
En anden part hævdede, at de kinesiske producenter har en komparativ fordel med hensyn til polysiliciumpriser og stordriftsfordele, som resulterede i lavere omkostninger til maskiner.
Another party claimed that the Chinese enjoyed a comparative advantage with regard to polysilicon prices and to economies of scales which resulted in lower cost of the machinery.
Parten fremlagde dog ingen nye oplysninger eller dokumentation i denne henseende.
This party did not provide any new information or supporting evidence in this regard.
Partens påstand måtte derfor afvises.
The claim of this party had therefore to be rejected.
Desuden påstod en interesseret part, at visse EU-producenter købte celler og/eller moduler i det pågældende land og videresolgte disse varer på EU-markedet som deres egne varer.
Moreover, one interested party claimed that some Union producers sourced cells and/or modules from the country concerned, and re-sold those products on the Union market as their own.
Parten krævede, at skaden som følge af disse transaktioner ikke burde tilskrives den subsidierede import.
It requested that injury resulting from these transactions is not attributed to the subsidised imports.
Undersøgelsen viste imidlertid, at EU-erhvervsgrenens import af den pågældende vare var komplementær, hvad angår typer, og begrænset i mængde i forhold til den samlede EU-produktion, og derfor ville den eventuelle virkning heraf kun være marginal, og det kan ikke antages, at den bryder årsagssammenhængen mellem den subsidierede import og den skade, der forvoldtes EU-erhvervsgrenen.
However, the investigation revealed that imports from the Union industry of the product concerned were complementary in nature as well as limited in terms of volume when compared to the total Union production and therefore their effect, if any, would only be marginal and could not be considered as breaking the causal link between the subsidised imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
En ikke forretningsmæssigt forbundet importør påstod, at det faktum, at antallet af ansatte steg, burde inddrages i analysen.
One unrelated importer argued that the fact that the number of employees increased should be considered in the analysis.
Vedrørende denne påstand skal det bemærkes, at beskæftigelsen steg mellem 2009 og 2011 for moduler og derefter faldt i UP.
In respect of this claim, it is noted that employment increased between 2009 and 2011 for modules and then decreased during the IP.
For celler steg beskæftigelsen indtil 2010, hvorefter den faldt i 2011 og yderligere faldt i UP.
For cells, the employment increased until 2010 and then decreased in 2011 and further decreased in the IP.
Det bemærkes yderligere, at for moduler fulgte beskæftigelsen udviklingen i EU-produktionen.
It is further noted that for modules, employment followed the trend of the Union production.
Da den kinesiske imports markedsandel for celler steg i hele perioden til skade for EU-erhvervsgrenen, kunne EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke drage fordel af det stigende forbrug som forventet.
For cells, as the Chinese imports increased their market share during the entire period to the detriment of the Union industry, the Union industry could not benefit from the growing consumption as expected.
Faldet i beskæftigelsen i 2011 og i UP svarer derfor til de virksomheder, som enten var blevet insolvente eller havde indstillet deres solcelleproduktion.
Therefore, the employment decrease in 2011 and in the IP corresponds to companies that either had become insolvent or stopped their cell production.
Som allerede forklaret i betragtning 682 i denne forordning og i betragtning 195–196 i forordningen om midlertidig antidumpingtold kan størrelse og dermed stordriftsfordele selv på det globale marked ikke længere opnås, når kapacitetsudnyttelsen er lav, og når der findes enorm overkapacitet på verdensplan.
As already explained in the recital (682) above and in recitals (195) and –(196) to the provisional anti-dumping Regulation, even in the global market, the size and therefore the benefit of economies of scale cannot longer exist where the utilization rates were generally low, and where enormous overcapacities existed world-wide.
Samme part gentog desuden, at skaden på EU-erhvervsgrenen skyldtes, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke var i stand til at realisere omkostningsfordele.
Moreover, the same party reiterated that the injury suffered by the Union industry was due to the inability of the Union industry to realize any cost advantage.