natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Fødselsdato: 1952
POB: Shahr Kord-Isfahan
Tidligere justitsminister (2009-2013), tidligere generalguvernør for Isfahan og direktør for statsfængselsorganisationen (indtil juni 2004)
DOB: 1959
Ved Teherans anklagers indsats vil to afdelinger i førsteinstans- og appelretterne og flere afdelinger i byretterne blive udpeget til at behandle spørgsmål vedrørende eksiliranere
In his capacity as governor and head of Tehran provincial Public Security Council, he was bearing overall responsibility for all repressive activities, including cracking down on political protests in June 2009.
HOSSEINI, dr. Mohammad (alias HOSSEYNI, dr. Seyyed Mohammad; Seyed, Sayyed og Sayyid)
He is known for being personally involved in the harassing of opposition leaders Karroubi and Moussavi.
Fødested: Rafsanjan, Kerman
POB: Mashad (Iran)
Fødselsdato: 1961
DOB: 1952
Tidligere minister for kultur og islamisk vejledning (2009-2013)
Former Minister of Justice (2009-2013), former Isfahan governor-general and director of the State Prisons Organisation (until June 2004).
Han var tidligere i IRGC og var medvirkende i undertrykkelsen af journalister
As Minister of Justice, he played a key role in threatening and harassing the Iranian diaspora by announcing the establishment of a special court to deal specifically with Iranians who live outside the country.
MOSLEHI Heydar (alias MOSLEHI Heidar; MOSLEHI Haidar)
With the Tehran Prosecutor's assistance, two branches of the courts of first instance and appeal courts and several branches of the magistrate courts will be assigned to deal with expatriate affairs.
Fødested: Isfahan (Iran)
HOSSEINI Dr Mohammad (Aka: HOSSEYNI, Dr Seyyed Mohammad; Seyed, Sayyed and Sayyid)
Fødselsdato: 1956
POB: Rafsanjan, Kerman
Tidligere efterretningsminister (2009-2013)
DOB: 1961
Under hans ledelse har Efterretningsministeriet fortsat praksissen med udbredte vilkårlige tilbageholdelser og forfølgelse af protesterende og systemkritikere.
Former Minister of Culture and Islamic Guidance (2009-2013).
Efterretningsministeriet driver fortsat Evinfængslets afdeling 209, hvor mange aktivister holdes indespærret på grund af deres fredelige aktiviteter i opposition til den siddende regering.
Ex-IRGC, he was complicit in the repression of journalists.
Forhørsledere fra Efterretningsministeriet har udsat fanger i afdeling 209 for prygl samt psykisk og seksuel mishandling.
MOSLEHI Heydar (Aka: MOSLEHI Heidar; MOSLEHI Haidar)
Som tidligere efterretningsminister er Moslehi ansvarlig for de overgreb, der har fundet sted i hans embedsperiode
POB: Isfahan (Iran)
Fødested: Maragheh (Iran)
DOB: 1956
Fødselsdato: 1957
Former Minister of Intelligence (2009-2013).
Medlem af Teherans byråd.
Under his leadership, the Ministry of Intelligence has continued the practices of widespread arbitrary detention and persecution of protesters and dissidents.
Tidligere minister for information og kommunikation (2009-2012)
The Ministry of Intelligence continues to run Ward 209 of Evin Prison, where many activists are being held on account of their peaceful activities in opposition to the government in power.
Var som minister for information en af de øverste ansvarlige for censur og kontrol med internetaktiviteter og alle andre former for kommunikation (navnlig mobiltelefoner).
Interrogators from the Ministry of Intelligence have subjected prisoners in Ward 209 to beatings and mental and sexual abuse.
Forhørsledere benytter under forhør af politiske fanger disses personlige oplysninger, mails og meddelelser.
As former Minister of Intelligence, Moslehi bears responsibility for abuse during his time in office.
Ved flere lejligheder siden det seneste præsidentvalg og i forbindelse med gadedemonstrationer er mobiltelefonlinjer og afsendelse af SMS'er blevet afbrudt, satellit-TV-kanaler er blevet blokeret, og internetforbindelsen er blevet afbrudt lokalt eller i det mindste gjort langsommere
POB: Maragheh (Iran)
Fødested: Hamedan
DOB: 1957
Bopæl: Teheran
Member of the City Council of Teheran.
Arbejdsplads: Press TV's hovedkvarter, Teheran
Former Minister for Information and Communications (2009-2012).
Nyhedsdirektør på Press TV.
As Minister for Information, he was one of the top officials in charge of censorship and control of internet activities and also all types of communications (in particular mobile phones).
Den uafhængige radio- og TV-tilsynsmyndighed OFCOM idømte Press TV i Det Forenede Kongerige en bøde på 100000 GBP for at have transmitteret den iransk-canadiske journalist og filmskaber Maziar Baharis tvungne tilståelse i 2011, som blev optaget i fængslet, mens Bahari var ulovligt tilbageholdt.
EMADI, Hamid Reza (aka: Hamidreza Emadi)
NGO'er har rapporteret om yderligere tilfælde af tvungne TV-transmitterede tilståelser på Press TV.
Date of Birth: appr.
Emadi forbindes derfor med krænkelse af retten til en retfærdig procedure og rettergang
Place of Birth: Hamedan
Denne afgørelse finder anvendelse indtil den 13. april 2015.
Place of residence: Tehran
Den gennemgås løbende.
Place of work: Press TV HQ, Tehran
I sin egenskab af guvernør og chef for Teheranprovinsens offentlige sikkerhedsråd havde han det overordnede ansvar for alle undertrykkelsesaktiviteterne, herunder indgrebene over for de politiske protester i juni 2009.
Press TV Newsroom Director.
Han er kendt for at være personligt inddraget i chikanen af oppositionslederne Karroubi og Moussavi
Former Press TV Senior Producer.
EMADI, Hamid Reza (alias Hamidreza Emadi)
Responsible for producing and broadcasting the forced confessions of detainees, including journalists, political activists, persons belonging to Kurdish and Arab minorities, violating internationally recognised rights to a fair trial and due process.
Formand
Independent broadcast regulator OFCOM fined Press TV in the UK GBP 100000 for broadcasting the forced confession of Iranian-Canadian journalist and film-maker Maziar Bahari in 2011, which was filmed in prison whilst Bahari was under duress.
om Tysklands foranstaltninger til fordel for HoKaWe Eberswalde GmbH SA.34721 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN)
on the measures implemented by Germany in favour of HoKaWe Eberswalde GmbH SA.34721 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN)
(meddelt under nummer C(2013) 7058)
(notified under document C(2013) 7058)
under henvisning til traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde, særlig artikel 108, stk. 2,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
efter at have opfordret interesserede parter til at fremsætte bemærkninger i henhold til ovennævnte bestemmelser [1], under hensyntagen til disse bemærkninger, og
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1], and having regard to their comments,
Den 30. april 2012 modtog Kommissionen en klage fra en træforarbejdende virksomhed, som driver et kraftværk i delstaten Brandenburg, vedrørende en 15-årig rammeaftale, som var blevet indgået mellem delstaten Brandenburg og HoKaWe Eberswalde GmbH (herefter »HoKaWe«), og som ifølge klageren udgør statsstøtte i henhold til artikel 107, stk. 1, i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde.
On 30 April 2012, the Commission received a complaint by a wood-processing undertaking established in the Land Brandenburg alleging that a 15-year-framework agreement concluded between the German Land of Brandenburg and HoKaWe Eberswalde GmbH (HoKaWe) constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Den 11. maj 2012 tilsendte Kommissionen Tyskland et ikke-fortroligt resumé af klagen og anmodede om yderligere oplysninger.
On 11 May 2012 the Commission submitted a non-confidential version of the complaint to Germany and requested additional information.
Ved brev af 6. juni 2012 tog Tyskland stilling til klagen og fremsendte de ønskede oplysninger.
By letter dated 6 June 2012 Germany provided comments on the complaint and submitted the additional information requested.
Den 27. august 2012 videresendte Kommissionen en ikke-fortrolig udgave af dette svar til klageren og spurgte, om klageren ville gå videre i sagen.
On 27 August 2012 the Commission sent a non-confidential version of the reply to the complainant, inquiring if the complainant wanted to pursue the matter further.
Klageren meddelte den 4. september 2012, at han ikke vil trække klagen tilbage.
The complainant replied on 4 September 2012 that the complaint would be upheld.
Ved brev af 19. december 2013 underrettede Kommissionen Tyskland om sin beslutning om at indlede den formelle undersøgelsesprocedure efter artikel 108, stk. 2, i TEUF vedrørende den pågældende støtte.
By letter of 19 December 2013, the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU in respect of the aid.
Kommissionens beslutning om at indlede en procedure blev offentliggjort i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende [2].
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Ved brev af 28. februar 2013 tog Tyskland stilling til beslutningen.
By letter of 28 February 2013 Germany provided comments on the decision.
Derudover modtog Kommissionen den 30. april 2013 bemærkninger fra to interesserede parter og den 3. maj 2013 en reaktion fra klageren.
The Commission received observations from two interested third parties on 30 April 2013 and from the complainant on 3 May 2013.
De ikke-fortrolige udgaver af disse bemærkninger blev videresendt til Tyskland den 17. maj 2013.
On 17 May 2013 non-confidential versions of these observations were sent to Germany.
Tyskland fremsatte bemærkninger hertil den 11. juni 2013 og supplerede disse bemærkninger ved brev af 13. juni 2013.
Germany commented on these observations on 11 June 2013 and completed these comments by letter of 13 June 2013.
Ved brev af 2. august 2013, 17. september 2013 og 23. september 2013 udbad Kommissionen sig nærmere oplysninger, som Tyskland besvarede ved brev af 15. august 2013, 20. september 2013 og 1. oktober 2013.
The Commission sent further requests for information to Germany by letters of 2 August 2013, 17 September 2013 and 23 September 2013 to which Germany replied by letters of 15 August 2013, 20 September 2013 and 1 October 2013 respectively.
BESKRIVELSE AF FORANSTALTNINGEN
DESCRIPTION OF THE AID
HoKaWe er et anpartsselskab, som driver et træfyret biomassekraftværk i Eberswalde i delstaten Brandenburg.
HoKaWe is a limited liability company that operates a wood-fired biomass power plant in Eberswalde in the Land Brandenburg.
Landkreis Barnim var interesseret i at erhverve HoKaWes aktiver med henblik på at fortsætte driften.
In June 2011 the county court of Frankfurt/Oder opened insolvency proceedings against HoKaWe.
I maj 2012 blev kontrakten vedrørende salget af HoKaWes aktiver vedtaget på skiftesamlingen, og salget blev optaget i en notarialakt.
However, the company is still economically active.
Da delstaten Brandenburg ikke har accepteret overdragelsen af rammeaftalen om levering af træ fra Brandenburgs statsskov (rammeaftalen er genstand for den foreliggende afgørelse) til den nye ejer, har Landkreis Barnim opsagt købskontrakten.
The Landkreis Barnim (district of Barnim) was interested in purchasing HoKaWe's assets in order to continue operating the power plant; in May 2012 the asset transaction was approved in a meeting of HoKaWe's creditors and the sale was notarised.
Beskrivelse af foranstaltningen
However, since the Land Brandenburg did not agree to transfer the framework agreement governing deliveries of wood from the Brandenburg State Forest (which is the subject of the present decision) to the new owner, the district of Barnim withdrew from the transaction.
I juni 2005 indgik delstaten Brandenburg og HoKaWe en rammeaftale om levering af træ fra Brandenburgs statsskov.
Description of the measure
Aftalen fastsætter mængderne, betingelserne og vilkårene for levering af træ [3] til HoKaWe i en periode på 15 år (fra den 1. juni 2006 til den 1. juni 2021).
In June 2005 the Land Brandenburg and HoKaWe concluded a framework agreement for the delivery of wood from the Brandenburg State Forest.
Der blev givet tilsagn om 150000 rummeter (rm) om året fra nærområdet (leveringsradius på maks. 70 km) omkring kraftværket i Eberswalde.
The agreement at stake stipulates the quantity and the terms and conditions of wood [3] deliveries to HoKaWe for a period of 15 years, from 1 June 2006 to 1 June 2021.
Følgelig skal der sondres mellem prisjusteringsklausulen efter aftalens ordlyd og prisjusteringsformelen.
In the agreement an initial reference price for the year 2004 of EUR 15,50/cubic meter was fixed.
Ifølge Tyskland afspejler prisjusteringsklausulen parternes hensigter.
In addition, the text of the agreement foresaw that yearly price adjustments would be agreed between the parties on the basis of the development of the industrial wood price index of the German Federal Statistical Office [4]; changes of the wood price compared to the initial reference price were to be borne 50 % by the seller and 50 % by the buyer (hereinafter: the ‘price adjustment clause’).
Dette baseres på et internt notat fra Brandenburgs ministerium for landbrug, miljøbeskyttelse og fysisk planlægning af 1. oktober 2003 vedrørende et møde mellem repræsentanter for delstaten Brandenburg og repræsentanter for HoKaWe, hvoraf det klart fremgår, at den af parterne under forhandlingerne tilstræbte prisjustering er i overensstemmelse med prisjusteringsklausulen.
For the purpose of the calculation of the corresponding price adjustment, the agreement furthermore laid down the following formula (hereinafter: the ‘price adjustment formula’ or ‘formula’):
Dette underbygges yderligere af et notat fra Brandenburgs ministerium for økonomi og europæiske anliggender af 5. januar 2011, hvori det anbefales at henholdsvis tilpasse og fortolke rammeaftalen således, at dens ordlyd følges, for på denne måde at afspejle parternes egentlige hensigter.
It is therefore necessary to distinguish between the price adjustment clause as laid down in the text of the agreement and the price adjustment formula.
Formelen var på sin side fejlagtig, hvilket bekræftes i en udtalelse fra Tyskland og i to udtalelser udarbejdet på delstaten Brandenburgs foranledning [5] i 2010, og førte ikke til et resultat, som ville have været i overensstemmelse med de hensigter, parterne definerede i prisjusteringsklausulen.
According to the submissions by Germany, on the one hand, the price adjustment clause must be seen as the representation of the intentions of the parties to the agreement.
Efter aftalens ikrafttræden blev prisen justeret på grundlag af formelen.
This is supported by an internal note of the Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Regional Planning of the Land Brandenburg of 1 October 2003 concerning a meeting between representatives of the Land Brandenburg and HoKaWe, which clearly shows that the price adjustment envisaged by the parties during the negotiations corresponded to the price adjustment clause.
I modsætning til de i aftalens ordlyd udtrykte hensigter svarede de efter formelen beregnede prisjusteringer ikke til den faktiske udvikling i industritræprisindekset, men lå derimod væsentligt under gennemsnitsprisen for træ fra statsskoven i Brandenburg.
It is also supported by a note from the Ministry of Economic and European Affairs of the Land Brandenburg of 5 January 2011, which recommended to adjust or interpret the framework agreement in a way that would respect the text of the agreement in order to reflect the true intentions of the parties.
Derudover førte formelen ikke til den af parterne tilstræbte ligelige fordeling af risikoen for prisudsving mellem delstaten og HoKaWe.
The formula on the other hand was flawed, as confirmed by Germany and by two expert opinions prepared in 2010 for the Land Brandenburg [5], and did not lead to a result that corresponded to the intentions of the parties as expressed in the price adjustment clause.
Årsagen hertil er, som det er nævnt i betragtning 16, det fejlagtige ved formelen, idet den ikke gengav de i prisjusteringsklausulen fastlagte hensigter hos parterne matematisk korrekt [6].
After the agreement entered into force, the price was adjusted on the basis of the formula.
Desuden fremgår det af Tysklands brev af 28. februar 2013, at parterne med hensyn til parametrene for beregningen af prisjusteringen i henhold til formelen har anlagt en vurdering flere gange i aftaleperioden [7].
Contrary to the intentions expressed in the text of the agreement, the price adjustments calculated in accordance with the formula did not follow the actual development of the industrial wood price index and led to prices that were significantly lower than the average price for wood from the Brandenburg State forests.
Tyskland meddelte Kommissionen, at årsagerne hertil ikke længere fremgår af dokumenterne.
Moreover, the formula did not lead to the envisioned result of sharing the risk of price fluctuations evenly between the State and HoKaWe.
I de to udtalelser, der blev udarbejdet på foranledning af delstaten Brandenburg i 2010 (jf. betragtning 16), blev der henvist til aftalens mulige statsstøtteretlige relevans, og det blev anbefalet at tilpasse aftalen gennem en ændring af formelen.
This was due to fact that, as pointed out above in recital (16), the formula was flawed and did not mathematically reflect the intentions of the parties as laid down in the price adjustment clause [6].
Fra denne dato var formelen altså ikke længere en bestanddel af aftalen og kunne således ikke længere finde anvendelse.
In addition, the submission by Germany of 28 February 2013 shows that, during the course of the agreement the parties repeatedly exercised their discretion as regards the parameters actually used for the calculation of the price adjustment pursuant to the formula [7].
Begrundelse for indledning af proceduren
The two expert opinions carried out for the Land Brandenburg in 2010 (see paragraph (16)) pointed to possible State aid problems and recommended to amend the agreement by changing the formula.
Den 19. december 2012 besluttede Kommissionen at indlede en formel undersøgelsesprocedure i henhold til artikel 108, stk. 2, i TEUF (herefter »indledningsbeslutningen«).
Following negotiations between HoKaWe and the Land Brandenburg, the parties therefore signed a modified version of the agreement on 26 August 2011, with effect from 1 July 2011.
Heri fandt Kommissionen foreløbig, at gennemførelsen af den mellem delstaten Brandenburg og HoKaWe indgåede rammeaftale omfatter et støttelement.
This modified version remedied the problems outlined in recitals (12) to (19) by laying down that from 1 July 2011 onwards prices had to be adjusted in accordance with the price adjustment clause and, thereby, in accordance with the original intentions of the parties.
Kommissionen satte spørgsmålstegn ved, om en privat sælger på markedet på forhånd ville have accepteret en afregningspris som den, der blev resultatet af anvendelsen af den beskrevne prisjusteringsformel.
Thus, from that date onwards the formula ceased to be part of the agreement and could, therefore, not be applied anymore.
Selv om man antager, at aftaleparterne ikke var klar over den fejlagtige formel, tvivler Kommissionen stadig meget på, at de tyske myndigheder handlede i overensstemmelse med markedet i forbindelse med en senere gennemførelse af aftalen.
Furthermore, the Land Brandenburg decided not to continue the contract with future investors taking over HoKaWe's assets.
Årsagen hertil var udviklingen i prisen på træ solgt i henhold til aftalen, for den efter formelen beregnede pris lå væsentligt lavere end gennemsnitsprisen på træ i delstaten Brandenburg.
Grounds for initiating the procedure
En fornuftig privat sælger i samme situation ville straks have brugt alle muligheder for at ændre prisjusteringsmetoden.
On 19 December 2012 the Commission decided to open a formal investigation procedure in accordance with Article 108(2) TFEU (‘the opening decision’).
Men de tyske myndigheder fortsatte med at anvende formelen indtil 2011.
In the opening decision the Commission preliminarily considered that the implementation of the framework agreement entered into between the Land Brandenburg and HoKaWe involved State aid.
Kommissionen nåede under hensyntagen til disse betragtninger til den konklusion, at det på nuværende tidspunkt ikke kan udelukkes, at HoKaWe har fået en fordel af aftalen, og at den derfor har udgjort statsstøtte i perioden fra aftalens ikrafttrædelsesdato (den 1.6.2006), til kontrakten blev ændret (den 30.6.2011).
The Commission questioned whether, from an ex ante perspective, a private vendor on the market would have accepted a remuneration as that resulting from the application of the described price adjustment formula.
Eftersom der hverken er noget åbenbart retsgrundlag for statsstøttens forenelighed, eller Tyskland har gjort et sådant gældende, tvivler Kommissionen på, at foranstaltningen kan anses for forenelig med det indre marked.
Moreover, even if the contracting parties would have been unaware of the flaws of the formula, the Commission expressed serious doubts as to whether Germany had acted in a market-conform manner during the implementation of the agreement.
BEMÆRKNINGER FRA INTERESSEREDE PARTER
This followed from the price development for wood sold under the agreement, which showed that the price calculated on the basis of the formula led to significantly lower prices than the average wood price in the Land Brandenburg.
I løbet af den formelle undersøgelsesprocedure modtog Kommissionen en bemærkning fra klageren samt to bemærkninger fra andre interesserede parter.
A prudent private vendor placed in a similar situation would have immediately used all possibilities to modify the adjustment method.
Ligeledes blev der i det interne notat fra marts 2004 henvist til, at prisjusteringsmetoden ville medføre urimelige prisindrømmelser fra delstaten Brandenburgs side.
In contrast, Germany continued using the formula until 2011.
Det blev derfor udtrykkeligt anbefalet at nytænke aftalen eller genforhandle enkelte punkter heri.
On the basis of these considerations the Commission came to the preliminary conclusion that an advantage in favour of HoKaWe and therefore the existence of State aid could not be excluded for the period from the date of coming into effect of the agreement (1 June 2006) until the amendment of the agreement (30 June 2011).
Desuden hævdede klageren, for så vidt angår prisjusteringen, at de aftalte priser ikke havde afspejlet den faktiske udvikling på træmarkedet, men snarere havde indbragt HoKaWe en uberettiget fordel.
COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES
Størrelsen af den i perioden fra 2006 til 2011 ydede støtte skønnes af klageren til 7,3 mio. EUR (til grund for dette skøn lægges den mellem klageren og andre leverandører aftalte gennemsnitspris på træ).
In the course of the formal investigation procedure the Commission received observations from two interested third parties as well as from the complainant.
Derudover har Kommissionen modtaget bemærkninger fra to træforarbejdende virksomheder i delstaten Brandenburg.
The complainant submitted internal notes of the Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Regional Planning of the Land Brandenburg dated December 2003 and March 2004.
Ifølge disse virksomheder havnede en væsentlig del af det træ, som kom fra statsskoven i Brandenburg, på grund af den langsigtede aftale i første omgang slet ikke på det regionale træmarked, hvilket har forårsaget uforholdsmæssige konkurrencefordrejninger og truet små træforarbejdende virksomheder på deres eksistens.
According to the complainant, these notes expressed, already prior to the conclusion of the agreement, concerns regarding several aspects of the agreement: Assessing the consequences of an agreement at the time, the note from December 2003 observed that, already for the year 2004, it would lead to a price well below the price for industrial wood at the time.
BEMÆRKNINGER FRA TYSKLAND
Likewise, the internal note from March 2004 pointed out that the price adaptation method would lead to inappropriate price concessions by the Land Brandenburg and explicitly recommended reconsidering or renegotiating the agreement.