natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Som følge af den stigende efterspørgsel steg det samlede beløb til faste afregningspriser betydeligt, og de fleste medlemsstater nedjusterede de eksisterende ordninger med faste afregningspriser bl.a. for at undgå en stigning i elomkostningerne.
As a consequence of the increased demand, the total amount of FITs paid increased significantly and most Member States revised the existing FIT schemes downwards to avoid inter alia an increase of electricity costs.
Dette viser, at nedskæringer i de faste afregningspriser også kan have været resultatet af de faldende priser og ikke omvendt.
This shows that FIT cutbacks may also have been the result of the decreasing prices and not vice versa.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse af oplysninger hævdede en part, at der var et modsætningsforhold mellem betragtning 246 ovenfor om, at en vurdering af efterspørgslen for Unionen som helhed er vanskelig, og betragtning 223 ovenfor, hvoraf det fremgår, at en analyse af årsagssammenhængen pr. medlemsstat ikke ville føre til brugbare resultater.
After final disclosure one party claimed that there was a contradiction between the recital (246) above, that an assessment of the demand for the Union as a whole is difficult, and the recital (223) above stating that a causation analysis per Member State would not lead to meaningful results.
Det skal i den forbindelse præciseres, at i den vurdering, der foretages i betragtning 246 ovenfor, henvises der til vanskeligheden ved at tegne et samlet billede af udviklingen i de faste afregningspriser for Unionen som helhed og ikke til EU-efterspørgslen som hævdet af den interesserede part.
In this respect, it is clarified that in the assessment made in recital (246) above, reference is made to the difficulty to draw a general picture of the FIT developments for the entire Union and not to the Union demand as claimed by the interested party.
Som følge heraf kan det konkluderes, at der ikke er noget modsætningsforhold mellem de to betragtninger, og påstanden blev derfor afvist.
As a consequence, it follows that no contradiction exists between the two recitals and therefore the claim was rejected.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse af oplysninger hævdede en part, at selv i en situation med høje faste afregningspriser kan modulpriserne falde betydeligt som følge af den teknologiske udvikling, stordriftsfordele, omkostningsbesparelser og stigende global produktionskapacitet.
After final disclosure, one party claimed that even in the context of high FIT rates, the module price may decrease significantly due to technological development, economies of scale, cost reductions and growing global production capacity.
Med hensyn til denne påstand skal det bemærkes, at den indsamlede dokumentation viser, at de italienske producenter måtte sænke deres priser til et niveau under produktionsomkostningerne, selv da de faste afregningspriser var høje.
In respect of this claim, it is noted that the evidence collected shows that the Italian producers had to reduce their prices below the cost of production even when FIT rates were high.
Mens ovennævnte faktorer ganske vist kan have haft en indvirkning på de gennemsnitlige omkostninger, kan de ikke forklare, hvorfor EU-producenter måtte sænke deres priser til et niveau under deres produktionsomkostninger.
While the factors mentioned above may indeed have had an impact on the average costs they cannot explain why Union producers had to reduce their prices below their cost of production.
Det konkluderes derfor, at det hovedsagelig var dumpingimporten fra Kina, der pressede priserne til et uholdbart niveau, og påstanden blev afvist.
Therefore, it is concluded that it was mainly the dumped imports from the PRC that pushed the prices to unsustainable levels and this claim was rejected.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse af oplysninger hævdede en part, at der ikke er dokumentation for konklusionen i betragtning 247 ovenfor om, at nedskæringer i de faste afregningspriser også kan have været et resultat af faldende priser og ikke omvendt.
After final disclosure, one party claimed that the conclusion drawn in recital (247) above, that FIT cutbacks may have also been the result of the decreasing prices and not vice versa, is not supported by any evidence.
Det bemærkes, at konklusionerne i betragtning 247 ovenfor byggede på de oplysninger, der var tilgængelige i forbindelse med undersøgelsen, og det beskrevne scenario blev faktisk anset for rimeligt i betragtning af omstændighederne på dette specifikke marked.
It is noted that the conclusions drawn in recital (247) above were based on the information available during the investigation and the scenario described was indeed considered as reasonable given the circumstances in this specific market.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse af oplysninger gjorde en part atter opmærksom på sin uenighed i den konklusion, at det nedadgående prispres på EU-producenterne navnlig kom fra dumpingimporten, og hævdede, at det tværtimod var nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser, der tvang EU-producenterne til at sænke deres priser.
After final disclosure, one party reiterated that it disagreed with the conclusion that the downward price pressure on Union producers was mainly exerted by the dumped imports and claimed that, to the contrary, it was the FIT cutbacks that forced the Union producers to reduce their prices.
Den samme part gentog, at når der blev skåret ned i de faste afregningspriser, faldt priserne på solcelleanlæg i takt med nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser, således at omkostningerne for projektudviklere ikke steg, hvilket i sidste ende forårsagede prispresset på EU-producenterne.
The same party reiterated that when FITs were reduced, the PV system prices decreased in line with the decrease in FITs so that costs for project developers do not increase, which ultimately caused the price pressure on the Union producers.
Da der ikke blev fremlagt afgørende beviser til støtte for disse påstande, fastholdt Kommissionen sin analyse og konklusionerne i betragtning 246-247 ovenfor.
Since no conclusive evidence was brought in support of these claims, the Commission maintained its analysis and conclusions as stated in recitals (246) to (247) above.
Den samme part hævdede, at markederne er drevet af udviklingen i de faste afregningspriser, og fremlagde oplysninger, der viser antallet af solcelleanlæg for 2012 og 2013 i Det Forenede Kongerige.
The same party claimed that markets are driven by the development of FITs and provided information showing the number of PV installations for the years 2012 and 2013 in the UK.
De oplysninger, som denne part fremlagde, var en publikation fra den britiske regering baseret på ugentlige registreringer i det centrale britiske register for faste afregningspriser (Central FiT Register — CFR).
The information provided by this party was a publication of the UK government based on the weekly registrations in the UK Central FiT Register (CFR).
Det bemærkes, at disse oplysninger hovedsagelig vedrørte en periode uden for UP og kun omhandlede én medlemsstat, mens denne undersøgelse vedrørte situationen på EU-markedet som helhed.
It is noted that this information related mostly to a period outside the IP and referred only to one Member State, while the current investigation focused on the situation of the Union market as a whole.
Under alle omstændigheder anfægtes det ikke, at niveauet for de faste afregningspriser påvirker efterspørgslen, da rentabiliteten af investeringerne i områder med mindre soleksponering afhænger af niveauet for de faste afregningspriser.
In any event, it is not contested that FIT levels influence demand, as the profitability of investments in locations with less solar radiation depends on the FIT level.
For at påvise, at det niveau, som de faste afregningspriser blev fastsat på i UP, forvoldte skaden, ville de interesserede parter imidlertid have skullet påvise, at en prisstigning hos EU-producenterne til det ikke skadevoldende niveau ville have betydet, at EU-producenterne ikke ville have været i stand til at sælge den pågældende vare, fordi investeringer i solcellesystemer ikke ville have været rentable på disse prisniveauer.
However, in order to show that the level at which FIT were set during the IP has caused the injury, interested parties would have had to show that a price increase of the Union producers to the non-injurious level would have meant that the Union producers would not have been able to sell the product concerned because investments into PV systems would not have been viable at those price levels.
Der er ikke fremlagt sådanne beviser.
No such evidence has been provided.
Derfor blev påstanden om, at nedskæringer i de faste afregningspriser brød årsagssammenhængen mellem dumpingimporten og den væsentlige skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen blev påført, afvist.
Therefore, the argument that the reductions in FITs broke the causal link between the dumped imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry was rejected.
Efter den foreløbige fremlæggelse af oplysninger gentog en part, at udviklingen i de faste afregningspriser gjorde solcelleinvesteringsmulighederne uattraktive for investorer og dermed mindskede efterspørgslen efter varen.
Following the provisional disclosure one party reiterated that FIT developments rendered the solar investment opportunities unattractive for investors and thus lowered the demand for the product.
En anden part hævdede, at konklusionerne i betragtning 173 i forordningen om midlertidig told om, at der stadig foretages investeringer i Spanien på trods af suspensionen af ordningerne om faste afregningspriser, var ukorrekte.
Another party claimed that the findings set out in recital (173) to the provisional Regulation that investments are still being made in Spain despite the suspension of the FIT schemes was incorrect.
Virkningen af faste afregningspriser på efterspørgslen blev behandlet i betragtning 173 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The impact of FITs on demand was addressed in recital (173) to the provisional Regulation.
Da der ikke blev fremført nye argumenter i den forbindelse, blev ovenstående påstand om, at efterspørgslen faldt på grund af udviklingen i de faste afregningspriser, afvist.
As no new arguments were brought forward in this respect, the above claim that demand decreased due to the FIT developments was rejected.
For så vidt angår investeringer i Spanien, præciseres det, at konklusionerne i betragtning 177 i forordningen om midlertidig told bygger på oplysninger indhentet i forbindelse med undersøgelsen og efterprøvet under et kontrolbesøg på stedet.
Regarding the investments in Spain, it is clarified that the findings in recital (177) to the provisional Regulation are based on information obtained during the investigation and verified during an on-spot investigation.
Da den berørte part ikke fremlagde nye oplysninger eller dokumentation i denne forbindelse, måtte påstanden afvises.
As the party concerned did not provide any new information or evidence in this respect, this claim had to be rejected.
Efter den foreløbige fremlæggelse af oplysninger hævdede flere parter, at i forbindelse med de lave faste afregningspriser var investeringer i solcelleprojekter kun økonomisk levedygtige, hvis der blev investeret i solpaneler til en lavere pris importeret fra Kina.
Following the provisional disclosure several parties claimed that in the context of the low FIT rates, investments in PV projects were economically viable only when supplied with the lower priced solar panels imported from the PRC.
Derfor blev det fremført, at nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser forvoldte EU-erhvervsgrenen væsentlig skade.
Therefore, it was argued that the FIT cutbacks caused the material injury to the Union industry.
En anden part hævdede, at niveauet for den faste afregningspris påvirker prisfastsættelsesmekanismen for moduler.
Another party argued that the level of the FIT rate influences the price setting mechanism for modules.
Det bør bemærkes, at omkostningerne for et modul, hvor et projekt stadig ville være økonomisk levedygtigt, varierer fra medlemsstat til medlemsstat eller fra region til region afhængigt af en lang række faktorer som f.eks. faste afregningspriser, andre lovgivningsmæssige incitamenter, soleksponering, konventionelle elpriser osv.
It should be noted that the cost of a module at which a project would still be economically viable varies by Member State or by region in function of numerous factors such as FITs, other regulatory incentives, solar exposure, conventional electricity prices, etc.
Desuden viste undersøgelsen, at nuværende anlæg er mindre og mindre afhængige af de faste afregningspriser, da der sandsynligvis vil være opnået netparitet for solceller for visse typer anlæg i flere regioner i Europa som f.eks. store dele af Italien, Spanien, Portugal, Sydfrankrig og Grækenland.
In addition, the investigation showed that current installations depend less and less on the FITs as PV grid parity is likely to have been reached for certain types of installations in several regions in Europe, such as a large portion of Italy, Spain, Portugal, southern France and Greece.
Af ovennævnte grunde blev påstande i den forbindelse afvist.
On the above grounds, the claims made in this regard were rejected.
En interesseret part hævdede, at Kommissionen ikke undersøgte, om EU-erhvervsgrenen havde undladt at tage højde for, at de offentlige støtteordninger pludselig ville blive afviklet eller mindre favorable.
One interested party claimed that the Commission did not investigate whether the Union industry failed to anticipate that government support schemes would be abruptly withdrawn or decreased.
Der blev ikke fremført argumenter til støtte for påstanden.
No arguments were brought in support of this claim.
Det bør dog bemærkes, at der ud fra den indsamlede dokumentation ikke er nogen oplysninger, der tyder på, at EU-erhvervsgrenen reagerede på markedssignalerne (dvs. udvikling i forbruget) og andre tilgængelige oplysninger (dvs. nedskæringer i støtteordninger) på en urimelig måde.
However, it should be noted that, based on the evidence collected, there is no information indicating that the Union industry responded to the market signals (i.e. development in consumption) and other available information (i.e. reduction in support schemes) in an unreasonable way.
En interesseret part fremførte, at nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser forårsagede faldet i EU-erhvervsgrenens salg, fordi investeringerne kun havde været levedygtige til de overkommelige kinesiske priser.
One interested party argued that the FIT cutbacks caused the Union industry's sales decline because investments had been viable only at the affordable Chinese prices.
De beviser, der blev indsamlet, viser faktisk kun et mindre fald i EU-erhvervsgrenens salg i UP i modsætning til, hvad der kunne forventes, hvis solenergiprojekter kun havde været gennemførlige med kinesiske moduler.
The evidence collected in fact shows only a slight decrease in the sales of the Union industry during the IP, in contrast to what it would be expected had the PV projects been feasible only with Chinese modules.
Tværtimod steg EU-erhvervsgrenens salg af moduler indtil 2011 og faldt derefter lidt i UP og fulgte samme tendens som forbruget.
On the contrary, the sales of modules of the Union industry increased until 2011 and then slightly decreased in the IP, following the same trend as of the consumption.
En anden interesseret part hævdede, at konklusionerne i betragtning 174 og 175 i forordningen om midlertidig told, om at ændringer i de faste afregningspriser ikke brød årsagssammenhængen, ikke bygger på noget faktisk eller retligt grundlag og ikke er i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 7, fordi Kommissionen undlod at vurderede omfanget af den skade, der er forårsaget af nedskæringerne i de faste afregningspriser, og fordi den var af den opfattelse, at det betydelige fald i EU-erhvervsgrenens priser kun var en konsekvens af den kinesiske dumpingimport.
Another interested party argued that the findings as set out in recitals (174) and (175) to the provisional Regulation that the FIT changes did not break the causal link has no factual or legal basis and is inconsistent with Article 3(7) of the basic Regulation because the Commission failed to assess the level of injury caused by the FIT reductions and because it considered that the significant drop in the Union industry's price had been a consequence only of the dumped Chinese imports.
Den samme part hævdede, at nedgangen i prisen på moduler, celler og wafere var et globalt fænomen og ikke skyldtes presset fra den kinesiske import.
The same party argued that the decrease in the price of modules, cells and wafers was a global phenomenon and not due to the pressure of the Chinese imports.
For så vidt angår påstanden om, at Kommissionen undlod at vurdere omfanget af den skade, der er forårsaget af nedskæringer i de faste afregningspriser, henvises der til betragtning 174, 175 og 182 i forordningen om midlertidig told og til betragtning 245-263 ovenfor, hvor Kommissionen konkluderede, at hverken faldende efterspørgsel eller de faste afregningsprisers indvirkning på Unionens priser kunne bryde årsagssammenhængen mellem den skade, som er forvoldt EU-erhvervsgrenen, og dumpingimporten fra Kina, uanset om og i hvilket omfang de sandsynligvis blev forårsaget af nedskæringer i de faste afregningspriser.
In respect of the claim that the Commission failed to assess the level of injury caused by the FIT cutbacks, reference is made to recitals (174), (175) and (182) to the provisional Regulation and recitals (245) to (263) above, where the Commission concluded that neither the decrease in demand nor the impact of FITs on Union prices were as such as to break the causal link between the injury suffered by the Union industry and the dumped imports from the PRC, irrespective of whether and to which extent they were possibly caused by the FIT cutbacks.
Derfor blev påstanden om, at Kommissionens konklusioner ikke bygger på noget faktisk grundlag, afvist.
Therefore, the claim that the Commission's findings have no factual basis was rejected.
For så vidt angår påstanden om, at faldet i prisen på moduler og celler var et globalt fænomen, henvises der til betragtning 164-167 i forordningen om midlertidig told, hvor mængder og priser ved import fra andre lande end Kina til Unionen vurderes.
As regards the claim that the decrease in the price of modules and cells was a global phenomenon, reference is made to the recitals (164) to (167) to the provisional Regulation where import volumes and prices from other countries than the PRC into the Union are assessed.
Der var ganske vist en global nedadgående tendens i priserne på moduler og celler, men priserne på dumpingimporten fra Kina har forværret den nedadgående tendens til tabsgivende niveauer.
While indeed there was a global downward trend in the prices of modules and cells, the dumped import prices from the PRC have exacerbated the downward trend to loss making levels.
På grundlag af ovenstående blev påstanden afvist.
On the basis of the above, this claim was rejected.
Da der ikke blev fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende andre finansielle støtteordninger til EU-erhvervsgrenen, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 184 og 185 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any comments concerning other financial support schemes granted to the Union industry, the findings in recitals (184) and (185) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
En interesseret part genfremsatte den påstand, at overkapaciteten på det globale marked såvel som på EU-markedet forvoldte den væsentlige skade snarere end importen fra Kina.
One interested party reiterated the claim that the overcapacity in the global as well as in the Union market caused the material injury rather than the imports from the PRC.
I den forbindelse blev det fremført, at EU-erhvervsgrenen udvidede sin kapacitet for meget, som det fremgår af den lave kapacitetsudnyttelsesgrad, og at enhver skade derfor var selvforskyldt.
In this regard it was argued that the Union industry over-expanded its capacities as evidenced by the low capacity utilisation rate and that therefore any injury was self-inflicted.
De påståede virkninger af overkapaciteten i EU og på verdensplan blev allerede behandlet i betragtning 185-190 i forordningen om midlertidig told, og da der ikke fremkom noget nyt element, måtte påstanden afvises.
The alleged impact of the overcapacity in the Union and world-wide was already addressed in recitals (185) to (190) to the provisional Regulation and therefore in the absence of any new element the claim had to be rejected.
En anden interesseret part hævdede, at overkapaciteten førte til prisrationalisering.
Another interested party claimed that the overcapacity led to price rationalization.
I den forbindelse skal det bemærkes, at på den ene side førte overkapaciteten rent faktisk til et »kapløb mod bunden« og pristryk for EU-erhvervsgrenen, som i gennemsnit oversteg nedskæringen i produktionsomkostningerne.
In this regard, it should be noted, on the one hand, that the overcapacity led in fact to a ‘race to the bottom’ and the suppression of the prices of Union industry, which on average exceeded the reduction of the costs of production.
Den berørte part fremlagde ingen nye oplysninger eller ny dokumentation i denne forbindelse, og påstandene måtte derfor afvises.
The party concerned did not submit any new information or evidence in this respect and the claims in this regard had therefore to be rejected.
En anden interesseret part hævdede, at den skade, der påførtes EU-erhvervsgrenen, skyldes, at EU-erhvervsgrenen udelukkende fokuserede på specialiserede investeringer, og at den ikke havde foretaget de nødvendige investeringer i kapacitetsforøgelser og nedbringelse af omkostninger.
Another interested party claimed that the injury suffered by the Union industry is due to the Union industry's focus only on specialized investments and its failure to make the necessary investments in capacity additions and cost reductions.
Denne påstand kunne heller ikke bekræftes af konklusionerne af undersøgelsen, som viste, at EU-erhvervsgrenen øgede sin produktionskapacitet og effektivitet i den betragtede periode, jf. betragtning 124 og 187 i forordningen om midlertidig told. Påstanden blev derfor afvist.
Likewise, this claim could not be confirmed by the findings of the investigation which showed that the Union industry increased its production capacity and efficiency during the period considered (recitals (124) and (187) to the provisional Regulation. This claim was therefore rejected.
Desuden hævdede en interesseret part, at EU-erhvervsgrenen øgede sin produktionskapacitet på trods af den allerede lave kapacitetsudnyttelsesgrad og derved påførte sig selv skade.
Moreover, an interested party claimed that the Union industry increased its production capacity in spite of already low capacity utilisation rates, thus resulting in self-inflicted injury.
Denne påstand byggede på en sammenligning af investeringstendensen hos de stikprøveudtagne EU-producenter og kapacitetsudnyttelsestendensen i hele EU-erhvervsgrenen, hvilket ikke er et egnet sammenligningsgrundlag.
This claim was based on the comparison between the trend of investments of the sampled Union producers and the trend of the capacity utilisation of the whole Union industry, which is not an appropriate basis for comparison.
Endvidere viste undersøgelsen, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke havde udvidet sin produktionskapacitet i et omfang, som oversteg udviklingen i EU-forbruget; derfor blev dette argument afvist.
Furthermore, the investigation showed that the Union industry had not expanded its production capacities on a scale which exceeded the development of Union consumption, therefore this argument was rejected.
Hertil kommer, at den indsamlede dokumentation viser, at EU-erhvervsgrenen gennem investeringer i nye maskiner kunne nedbringe sine produktionsomkostninger og blive mere omkostningseffektiv.
Moreover, the evidence collected indicates that through investments in new machinery, the Union industry could reduce its cost of production and become more cost competitive.