natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Programmet er også specifikt efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 3, da det er begrænset til bestemte geografiske områder, dvs. byer i det gamle industriområde i den centrale region.
This programme is also specific under Article 4(3) of the basic Regulation given that it is limited to certain designated areas, i.e. the cities of the old industrial bases of the Central region.
Den fordel, som modtagerne opnår, betragtes som den momsbesparelse, de får ved at fratrække moms ved køb af anlægsaktiver.
The benefit conferred on the recipients is considered to be the amount of VAT savings generated by the deduction on the purchase of fixed assets.
Eftersom der ikke forelå oplysninger med henblik på vurderingen af fordelen, og eftersom et tilsvarende momsprogram allerede er blevet vurderet i denne sag, er den mest hensigtsmæssige informationskilde med henblik på vurderingen af fordelen for de eksporterende producenter vurderingen i betragtning 297 og 298.
In the absence of information for the assessment of this benefit and since a comparable VAT programme has already been examined in this proceeding, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been the assessment made in recitals (297) and (298).
Den således fastsatte subsidiesats for alle ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder udgør 0,89 %.
The subsidy rate thus established for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,89 %.
I klagen opføres en række andre skattefordele, der blev givet i perioden 2008-2010 til producenter af stålprodukter, der er overtrukket med organisk materiale, beliggende i Ma'anshan og Wuhan, såsom fritagelse for afgift til vedligeholdelse af og byggeri i byen samt ekstra afgifter til uddannelsesfonde.
The complaint listed miscellaneous tax privileges from 2008 to 2010 enjoyed by OCS producers located in Ma'anshan and Wuhan, including exemptions from city maintenance and construction tax, and extra charges on education funds.
Kommissionen bad den kinesiske regering afgive oplysninger om disse skattefordele.
The Commission asked the GOC to provide information on these tax benefits.
Den kinesiske regering svarede, at de ønskede oplysninger var irrelevante for undersøgelsen, da ingen af de eksporterende producenter var beliggende i Ma'anshan.
The GOC replied that the requested information were irrelevant for the investigation because none of the sampled exporting producers was located in Ma'anshan.
Kommissionen henviser til sin redegørelse for, at den kinesiske regering blev anmodet om at fremsende oplysninger vedrørende påstandene om subsidier til virksomheder, der ikke indgik i stikprøven (ovenstående betragtning 34-35).
The Commission refers to its explanation that the GOC was requested to submit information also with regard to the subsidy allegations concerning the non-sampled companies (recitals (34) - (35) above).
Eftersom den kinesiske regering ikke har fremsendt oplysninger, konkluderer Kommissionen, at skattefordelene i Ma'anshan og Wuhan skal betragtes som subsidier i form af indtægter, som den kinesiske stat giver afkald på, jf. artikel 3, stk. 1, litra a), nr. ii).
In the absence of information provided by the GOC, the Commission concludes that the tax privileges available in Ma'anshan and Wuhan are to be considered a subsidy in the form of revenue forgone by the GOC in accordance with Article 3(1)(a)(ii).
De giver de modtagende virksomheder, jf. grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 2, en fordel, idet de opnår en skattebesparelse svarende til forskellen mellem den skat, der betales, og det skattebeløb, der normalt skulle betales, hvis programmet ikke fandtes.
They confer a benefit to the recipient companies in the meaning of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation in that they provide a tax saving equal to the difference between the tax paid and the amount of tax normally payable in the absence of this programme.
Programmet er specifikt efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 3, da det er begrænset til virksomheder beliggende i bestemte udpegede regioner eller kommuner i Ma'anshan.
The programme is specific within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the basic Regulation given that it is limited to the enterprises established in certain designated regions or municipalities in Ma'anshan.
Eftersom der ikke findes andre oplysninger med henblik på vurderingen af denne fordel, baserer Kommissionen sin afgørelse på oplysningerne i klagen.
In the absence of other information for the assessment of this benefit the Commission based its findings on information contained in the complaint.
Den således fastsatte subsidiesats for alle ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder udgør 0,08 %.
The subsidy rate thus established for all non-cooperating companies amounts to 0,08 %.
Klagen indeholder en påstand om, at virksomheder, der producerer den pågældende vare, fra og med 2005 og indtil for nylig (herunder også i 2009) opnåede fordele under forskellige tilskudsprogrammer og underprogrammer.
The complaint alleged that as from the year 2005 until recently (including the year 2009) the companies producing the product concerned received benefits under several grant programmes and sub-programmes.
Det kan ikke udelukkes, at betalingerne under dette program enten stadig pågår eller er udbetalt på et ikke tilbagevendende grundlag i forbindelse med kapitalinvesteringer, og der forefindes således stadig fordele, som ikke er fuldt tilbagebetalt i den valgte 15-årige tilbagebetalingsperiode.
It cannot be ruled out that payments under this programme either are still on-going or have been effected on a non-recurring basis in connection with capital investment and thus there are still on-going benefits not fully amortised during the chosen 15-year amortisation period.
Den kinesiske regering blev anmodet om at fremsende oplysninger om disse programmer, men har ikke fremsendt et fyldestgørende svar vedrørende disse programmer.
The GOC was requested to submit information on these programmes but has failed to provide a meaningful reply on any of these programmes.
Eftersom den kinesiske regering ikke har afgivet noget svar vedrørende disse aspekter, baserer Kommissionen sine konklusioner på de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 28.
Therefore, in the absence of replies by the GOC on all these aspects, the Commission is basing its findings on the best evidence available in compliance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation
Programmet har følgende retsgrundlag, jf. klagen:
The legal bases of this programme as reported in the complaint are the following:
cirkulære om gennemførelse af evaluering af produkter, der skal betegnes China World Top Brand, GZJH [2005] nr. 95
Circular on Carrying out Evaluation of Products to be Recognised as China World Top Brand, GZJH [2005] No 95
meddelelse nr. 5, 2005 fra Kinas fremstødskomité for Top Brand-strategien, offentliggørelse af listen over China Top Brand-produkter
Announcement No 5, 2005 of China Promotion Committee for Top Brand Strategy, Promulgating the List of China Top Brand Products
cirkulære om anvendelse af China World Top Brands i 2006, ZJZH [2006] nr. 11
Circular on application of China World Top Brands in 2006, ZJZH [2006] No 11;
meddelelse nr. 6, 2006, fra Kinas fremstødskomité for Top Brand-strategien, offentliggørelse af listen over China Top Brand-produkter
Announcement No 6, 2006 of China Promotion Committee for Top Brand Strategy, Promulgating the List of China Top Brand Products;
meddelelse nr. 6, 2007, fra Kinas fremstødskomité for Top Brand-strategien, offentliggørelse af listen over China Top Brand-produkter
Announcement No 6, 2007 of China Promotion Committee for Top Brand Strategy, Promulgating the List of China Top Brand Products;
cirkulære om anvendelse af China World Top Brands i 2008, ZJZH [2008] nr. 23
Circular on application of China World Top Brands in 2008, ZJZH [2008] No 23;
foranstaltninger til forvaltning af kinesiske Top Brand-produkter udstedt af Kinas regering.
Measures for the Administration of Chinese Top-Brand Products issued by the GOC
Kun producenter, der har fået tildelt betegnelsen "China World Top Brand", har ret til fordelene under dette program.
Only producers granted the designation of "China World Top Brand" are entitled to the benefits of this programme.
I klagen er nævnt en række stålprodukter, som har fået denne betegnelse og er produceret af stålvirksomheder, der er omfattet af denne undersøgelse.
The complaint reports a number of steel products produced by the steel companies subject to this investigation as being granted this designation.
På grund af den manglende samarbejdsvilje fra den kinesiske regerings side er konklusionerne i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 28 baseret på de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger.
Given the lack of cooperation of the GOC, the findings are based on the information present on the file in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
Under dette program ydes der økonomiske bidrag i form af tilskud, lån til under markedsrente og andre incitamenter, der udgør en direkte overførsel af midler, som giver modtagerne en fordel efter grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1, litra a) nr. i) og artikel 3, stk. 2.
This programme provides financial contributions in the form of grants, below-market loans and other incentives, which constitute a direct transfer of funds conferring a benefit upon the recipients within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(i) and Article 3(2) of the basic regulation.
Disse subsidier er specifikke efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 2, litra a), da loven begrænser adgangen til bestemte virksomheder, dvs. virksomheder, som har fået betegnelsen "China World Top Brand" til deres produkter.
This subsidy is specific within the meaning of Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation because the legislation limits access to certain enterprises only, that is the enterprises that have received the designation "China World Top Brand" for their products.
Endvidere har den subsidieydende myndighed ikke fastsat objektive kriterier for, hvem der er berettiget til ordningen, idet berettigelsen til subsidier ikke er automatisk efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 2, litra b).
Furthermore, there are no objective criteria established by the granting authority with regard to the eligibility of the scheme, which is not automatic under Article 4(2)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Da der ikke forelå nogen nøjagtig kvantificering andetsteds, var den mest hensigtsmæssige informationskilde med henblik på vurderingen af fordelen for de eksporterende producenter sammenlignelige afgørelser truffet af de amerikanske myndigheder.
In the absence of precise quantification elsewhere, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been comparable decisions by the US authorities.
Som tidligere bemærket tager Kommissionen, når den baserer sine konklusioner vedrørende subsidiebeløb på andre undersøgelser, bl.a. hensyn til, om der er foretaget betydelige ændringer i den pågældende ordning, og om subsidiebeløbet er blevet mindre over tid.
As mentioned before, when basing subsidy amounts on findings in other investigations, account is taken throughout this regulation of, inter alia, whether there have been any significant changes in the scheme in question and whether the subsidy amount may have diminished over time.
Den således fastsatte subsidiesats med hensyn til denne ordning under UP for alle ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder udgør 0,13 %, dvs. den matematiske gennemsnitssats for tilsvarende programmer, jf. US Decision Memorandum of 6 April 2009 on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts (side 6) (Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 69, side 16836 / 13. april 2009), US Decision Memorandum of 14 May 2010 on Pre-Stressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (side 29) (Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 98, side 28557 / 21. maj 2010), US Decision Memorandum of 28 May 2010 on Certain Steel Grating (side 18) (Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 109, side 32362 / 8. juni 2010), US Decision Memorandum of 28 March 2011 on Aluminium Extrusions (side 19) (Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 64, side 18521 / 4. april 2011) og US Decision Memorandum of 11 October 2011 on Multi-layered Wood Flooring (side 17) (Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 201, side 64313 / 18. oktober 2011).
The subsidy rate thus established with regard to this scheme during the IP for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,13 % which is the arithmetical average rate for similar programmes as established in the US Decision Memorandum of 6 April 2009 on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts (Page No. 6) (Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 69, page 16836 / 13 April 2009), the US Decision Memorandum of 14 May 2010 on Pre-Stressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (Page No. 29) (Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 98, page 28557 / 21 May 2010), the US Decision Memorandum of 28 May 2010 on Certain Steel Grating (Page No. 18) (Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 109, page 32362 / 8 June 2010), the US Decision Memorandum of 28 March 2011 on Aluminium Extrusions (Page No. 19) (Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 64, page 18521 / 4 April 2011) and the US Decision Memorandum of 11 October 2011 on Multi-layered Wood Flooring (Page No. 17) (Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 201, page 64313 / 18 October 2011).
Med hensyn til de amerikanske myndigheders undersøgelser bemærkes det, at den metode, der er anvendt til at beregne fordelen ved tilskudsprogrammer, i alt væsentligt er den samme som den, der anvendes af Unionen [76].
With regard to investigations conducted by the US authorities, it is noted that the methodology used for calculating the amount of benefit from grant programmes is substantially the same as that employed by the Union [76].
Famous Brands-programmet og underprogrammer (Chongqing Famous Brands, Hubei Province Famous Brands, Ma'anshan Famous Brands, Shandong Province Top Brands og Wuhan Famous Brands)
Famous Brands programme and sub-programmes (Chongqing Famous Brands, Hubei Province Famous Brands, Ma'anshan Famous Brands, Shandong Province Top Brands, Wuhan Famous Brands)
Dette program har, jf. klagen med hensyn til Shandong-underprogrammet, følgende retsgrundlag:
The legal bases of this programme as reported in the complaint with regard to the Shandong sub-programme are the following:
notat om trykning og distribution af 2003-politikker om tilskyndelse til udvidelse af udenrigshandelseksporten for Shandong, LWJMJCZ, [2003] nr. 180
Notice on Printing and Distribution of 2003 Policies for Encouraging and expanding Foreign Trade Export to Shandong, LWJMJCZ, [2003] No 180;
olitikker for tilskyndelse til udvikling af udenrigshandel og økonomisk samarbejde i Shandong, LWJMJCZ, [2003] nr. 1037
2004 Policies for Encouraging the Development of Foreign Trade & Economic Cooperation in Shandong, LWJMJCZ, [2003] No 1037;
olitikker for tilskyndelse til udvikling af udenrigshandel og økonomisk samarbejde i Shandong
2005 Policies for Encouraging the Development of Foreign Trade & Economic Cooperation in Shandong;
notat om trykning og distribution af 2006-politikker om tilskyndelse til udvidelse af udenrigshandlen og økonomisk samarbejde i Shandong, LCQ [2006] nr. 5.
Notice on Printing and Distribution of 2006 Policies for Encouraging the Development of Foreign Trade & Economic Cooperation in Shandong, LCQ [2006] No 5.
særbudget for tildeling af midler til udvikling af selveksporterende varemærker, Lucaiqizhi, 2008, nr. 75.
Special Award Fund Budget for the Development of Self-Exporting Brands, Lucaiqizhi, 2008, No 75.
Under dette program gives der fordele til producenter af produkter, der er udpeget som "Famous Brands" og beregnet til eksportmarkeder.
This programme confers benefits to producers of products designated as "Famous Brands" and meant for export markets.
I klagen nævnes en række producenter af den undersøgte vare, der har haft fordel af dette program indtil mindst 2009.
The complaint refers to a number of producers of the product concerned having benefited from this programme until at least 2009.
Det hævdes i klagen, at programmet havde til formål at fremme nationalt støttede erhvervsgrene og tilskynde til eksport af deres produkter til verdensmarkedet.
The complaint asserts that this programme was designed to promote domestic advanced industries and encourage exports of their products to the world markets.
Rammerne for programmet er et centralt program, og myndighederne i provinserne og kommunerne udvikler deres egne programmer for berømte mærker i overensstemmelse med det centrale program for at fremme eksporten af lokale produkter.
The main framework of this programme is set in the central programme, and provincial and local governments develop their own famous brands programmes consistently with the central programme to promote the export of local products.
USA har indbragt dette subsidieprogram for WTO (DS 387).
The USA have challenged this grant programme at the WTO (DS 387).
Desuden har de amerikanske myndigheder erklæret dette program udligningsberettiget i flere sager, som er nævnt i klagen.
In addition, the US authorities have countervailed this programme in several proceedings referred to in the complaint.
Endvidere har Kommissionen erklæret, at fordelene under dette program er udligningsberettigede i sagen om coated finpapir [77].
The Commission has also countervailed the benefits under this programme in the Coated fine paper case [77].
Under programmet "Famous Brands" ydes der finansielle bidrag i form af lån med rentegodtgørelse, finansiering af F&U og kontante tilskud til eksport.
The 'famous brands' programme provides financial contributions in the form of subsidised interest loans, R&D funding, and cash grant rewards for exporting.
Disse incitamenter udgør en direkte overførsel af midler, som giver modtagerne en fordel, jf. grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1, litra a), nr. i) og artikel 3, stk. 2.
These incentives constitute a direct transfer of funds conferring a benefit upon the recipients within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(i) and Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation.
Disse subsidier er specifikke efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 2, litra a), da loven begrænser adgangen til virksomheder, der eksporterer produkter, som har fået betegnelsen "Famous Brands".
This subsidy is specific under Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation because the legislation limits access only to those enterprises recognised to export products designated as 'famous brands'.
Eftersom den støttetildelende myndighed angiveligt ikke har indført objektive kriterier og betingelser for programmets anvendelse, foreligger der også specificitet efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 2, litra b).
Furthermore, given the apparent absence of objective criteria and conditions for the application of this programme by the granting authority, specificity is also found under Article 4(2)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Den favorable behandling under dette program er også specifik efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 4, litra a), fordi fordelene er betinget af eksportresultater for de relevante "Famous Brands"-produkter.
The preferential treatment under this programme is also specific according to Article 4(4)(a) of the basic Regulation because its benefits are contingent upon export performance of the relevant 'famous brand' products.
Eftersom der ikke forelå nogen nøjagtig kvantificering andetsteds, var den mest hensigtsmæssige informationskilde med henblik på vurderingen af fordelen for de eksporterende producenter de amerikanske myndigheders sammenlignelige afgørelser (baseret på ligheder i programmernes art).
In the absence of precise quantification elsewhere, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been comparable decisions (based on similarity in the nature of the programme) by the US authorities.
Med hensyn til de amerikanske myndigheders undersøgelser bemærkes det, at den metode, der er anvendt til at beregne fordelen ved tilskudsprogrammer, i alt væsentligt er den samme som den, der anvendes af Unionen [78].
With regard to investigations conducted by the US authorities, it is noted that the methodology used for calculating the amount of benefit from grant programmes is substantially the same as that employed by the Union [78].
Den kinesiske regerings manglende samarbejdsvilje
Non-cooperation by the Government of China
Den kinesiske regering anfører kun i spørgeskemaet, at programmet blev afsluttet i 2003, og at ingen af virksomhederne i stikprøven har været omfattet af det.
In its questionnaire reply GOC only stated that this programme has been terminated in 2003 and that none of the sampled exporters has benefited from it.
Da den kinesiske regering ikke har suppleret svaret med uddybende dokumentation eller yderligere præciseringer, analyserer Kommissionen dette program på grundlag af de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger, jf. grundforordningens artikel 28.
As the GOC has not supplemented this reply with any underlying evidence or further clarification, the Commission analyses this programme on the basis of facts available pursuant to Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
Dette program har, jf. klagen med hensyn til Shandong-underprogrammet, følgende retsgrundlag:
The legal bases of this programme referred to in the complaint are the following:
følgende statslige cirkulærer:
State Circulars:
Guojingmao Touzi nr. 886 fra 1999, Guojingmao Touzi nr. 122 fra 1999, Guojingmao Touzi nr. 1038 fra 1999 og Guojingmao Touzi nr. 822 fra 2000
Guojingmao Touzi No 886 of 1999, Guojingmao Touzi No 122 of 1999, Guojingmao Touzi No 1038 of 1999, Guojingmao Touzi No 822 of 2000 and
foranstaltninger til forvaltning af den særlige nationale fond for gæld vedrørende nationale nøgleteknologiprojekter
Measures for the Administration of National Debt Special Fund for National Key Technology Renovation Projects
På grund af det manglende samarbejde med den kinesiske regering har Kommissionen baseret sine konklusioner på oplysninger i klagen og/eller andre heri nævnte kilder [79].
Given the lack of cooperation of the GOC, the Commission relies on the elements included in the complaint and/or on the other sources mentioned in the complaint [79].
Ifølge klagen har fonden ydet i alt 75 mia. RMB i investeringsstøtte til 47 jern- og stålvirksomheder.
According to the complaint, the fund has supported 47 iron and steel enterprises with respect to investments totalling RMB 75 billion.
De amerikanske myndigheder har i mindst to sager kendt dette program udligningsberettiget.
The US authorities have countervailed this programme in at least two proceedings.
Programmet udgør subsidier, da der ydes finansielle bidrag i form af tilskud til erhvervelse af anlægsaktiver, jf. grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1, litra a), nr. i), hvilket giver modtageren en fordel.
The programme constitutes a subsidy as it provides financial contributions in the form of grants for the acquisition of fixed assets in accordance with Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation, which confers a benefit to the recipient.
Eftersom subsidierne er knyttet til anlægsaktiver og er tildelt over tid, er konklusionen i henhold til de foreliggende oplysninger, at fordelen er fortsat ind i UP.
Since the subsidy is linked to fixed assets and is allocated over time, it is concluded, on the basis of facts available, that this benefit continues into the IP.
Subsidierne er specifikke efter grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 2, litra a), da støtten er begrænset til bestemte store statsejede virksomheder og virksomheder, som staten er aktionær i, blandt de 512 nøglevirksomheder og 120 pilotvirksomhedsgrupper.
This subsidy is specific in the meaning of Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation as the support is limited to certain large-sized state-owned enterprises and state-holding enterprises among 512 key enterprises and 120 pilot enterprise groups.