natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kreditvurderingsbureauets uafhængighed i forhold til den kreditvurderede enhed påvirkes også af potentielle interessekonflikter mellem dets største aktionærer og den kreditvurderede enhed.
The independence of a credit rating agency vis-à-vis a rated entity is also affected by possible conflicts of interest of any of its significant shareholders with the rated entity.
En aktionær i et kreditvurderingsbureau kan være medlem af en kreditvurderet enheds eller tilknyttet tredjeparts administrations- eller tilsynsorgan.
A shareholder of a credit rating agency could be a member of the administrative or supervisory board of a rated entity or a related third party.
Forordning (EF) nr. 1060/2009 forholder sig til denne situation for så vidt angår interessekonflikter forårsaget af vurderingsanalytikere, personer, der godkender kreditvurderinger, og andre ansatte i kreditvurderingsbureauet.
Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 addresses this type of situation only as regards the conflicts of interest caused by rating analysts, persons approving the credit ratings or other employees of the credit rating agency.
Nævnte forordning er imidlertid tavs om potentielle interessekonflikter forårsaget af aktionærer eller selskabsdeltagere i kreditvurderingsbureauer.
That Regulation is, however, silent as regards potential conflicts of interest caused by shareholders or members of credit rating agencies.
For at styrke opfattelsen af kreditvurderingsbureauerne som uafhængige af de vurderede enheder vil det være hensigtsmæssigt at udvide de eksisterende regler, der er fastsat i den nævnte forordning, vedrørende interessekonflikter forårsaget af kreditvurderingsbureauernes ansatte, til at omfatte interessekonflikter forårsaget af aktionærer eller selskabsdeltagere med betydelige aktieposter i kreditvurderingsbureauet.
With a view to enhancing the perception of independence of credit rating agencies vis-à-vis the rated entities, it is appropriate to extend the existing rules set out in that Regulation on conflicts of interest caused by employees of the credit rating agencies to those caused by shareholders or members holding a significant position within the credit rating agency.
Kreditvurderingsbureauet bør derfor afholde sig fra at udstede kreditvurderinger, eller det bør oplyse, at det kan få indflydelse på kreditvurderingen, når en aktionær eller en selskabsdeltager, der besidder 10 % af stemmerettighederne i kreditvurderingsbureauet, også er medlem af den kreditvurderede enheds administrations- eller tilsynsorgan eller har investeret i den kreditvurderede enhed, når investeringen når et vist niveau.
Hence, the credit rating agency should abstain from issuing credit ratings, or should disclose that the credit rating may be affected, where a shareholder or member holding 10 % of the voting rights of that agency is also a member of the administrative or supervisory board of the rated entity or has invested in the rated entity when the investment reaches a certain size.
Endvidere bør det forhold, at en aktionær eller selskabsdeltager, der besidder mindst 5 % af stemmerettighederne i dette kreditvurderingsbureau, har investeret i den kreditvurderede enhed eller er medlem af dens administrations- eller tilsynsorgan, offentliggøres, i det mindste hvis investeringen når op på et vist niveau.
Furthermore, the fact that a shareholder or member holding at least 5 % of the voting rights of that credit rating agency has invested in the rated entity or is a member of the administrative or supervisory board of the rated entity should be disclosed to the public, at least if the investment reaches a certain size.
Såfremt en aktionær eller en selskabsdeltager kan øve betydelig indflydelse på kreditvurderingsbureauets virksomhed, bør denne person desuden ikke yde konsulent- eller rådgivningsbistand til den kreditvurderede enhed eller en tilknyttet tredjepart vedrørende dennes selskabsstruktur eller juridiske struktur, aktiver, passiver eller aktiviteter.
Moreover, where a shareholder or member is in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activity of the credit rating agency, that person should not provide consultancy or advisory services to the rated entity or a related third party regarding its corporate or legal structure, assets, liabilities or activities.
For at sikre, at reglerne om uafhængighed og forebyggelse af interessekonflikter som fastsat i forordning (EF) nr. 1060/2009 kan anvendes i praksis, er der behov for et tilstrækkeligt højt antal kreditvurderingsbureauer, som hverken er forbundet med det hidtidige kreditvurderingsbureau i tilfælde af rotation eller med det kreditvurderingsbureau, der leverer kreditvurderingstjenester sideløbende til den samme udsteder.
In order to ensure a workable application of the rules on independence and prevention of conflicts of interest set out in Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 and to prevent them from becoming ineffective, there is a need for a sufficiently high number of credit rating agencies, unconnected with both the outgoing credit rating agency in case of rotation and the credit rating agency providing credit rating services in parallel to the same issuer.
Det er hensigtsmæssigt at kræve en skarp adskillelse mellem det hidtidige kreditvurderingsbureau og det nye bureau i tilfælde af rotation og mellem de to kreditvurderingsbureauer, der leverer kreditvurderingstjenester sideløbende til den samme udsteder.
It is appropriate to require a strict separation of the outgoing agency from the incoming credit rating agency in the case of rotation as well as of the two credit rating agencies providing credit rating services in parallel to the same issuer.
De berørte kreditvurderingsbureauer bør ikke være forbundet med hinanden ved et kontrolforhold, ved at indgå i den samme koncern af kreditvurderingsbureauer, ved at være aktionær eller selskabsdeltager eller ved at kunne udøve stemmerettigheder i et af de andre kreditvurderingsbureauer eller ved at kunne udpege medlemmer af administrations- eller tilsynsorganet i et af de andre kreditvurderingsbureauer.
The credit rating agencies concerned should not be linked to each other by control, by being part of the same group of credit rating agencies, by being a shareholder or a member of or being able to exercise voting rights in any of the other credit rating agencies, or by being able to appoint members of the administrative or supervisory boards of any of the other credit rating agencies.
Kreditvurderingsbureauer bør etablere, fastholde, håndhæve og dokumentere en effektiv intern kontrolstruktur for gennemførelse af politikker og procedurer til forebyggelse og kontrol af eventuelle interessekonflikter og for at sikre kreditvurderinger, vurderingsanalytikere og vurderingsteams, der er uafhængige i forhold til aktionærer, administrations- og ledelsesorganer og salgs- og marketingaktiviteter.
Credit rating agencies should establish, maintain, enforce and document an effective internal control structure governing the implementation of policies and procedures for the prevention and control of possible conflicts of interest and for ensuring the independence of credit ratings, rating analysts and rating teams regarding shareholders, administrative and management bodies and sales and marketing activities.
Der bør udarbejdes standardforskrifter vedrørende god virksomhedsledelse, organisation og håndtering af interessekonflikter.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) should be put in place relating to corporate governance, organisational matters, and the management of conflicts of interest.
Disse standardforskrifter bør revideres og overvåges med jævne mellemrum for at vurdere deres effektivitet, samt hvorvidt de bør ajourføres.
SOPs should be periodically reviewed and monitored to evaluate their effectiveness and whether they should be updated.
Opfattelsen af kreditvurderingsbureauer som uafhængige vil især lide skade, hvis de samme aktionærer eller selskabsdeltagere investerer i forskellige kreditvurderingsbureauer, der ikke tilhører den samme koncern af kreditvurderingsbureauer, i hvert tilfælde hvis investeringen er af et sådant niveau, at disse aktionærer eller selskabsdeltagere får mulighed for at udøve en vis indflydelse på kreditvurderingsbureauets virksomhed.
The perception of independence of credit rating agencies would be particularly affected should the same shareholders or members be investing in different credit rating agencies not belonging to the same group of credit rating agencies, at least if such investment reaches a certain size that could allow those shareholders or members to exercise a certain influence on the credit rating agency’s business.
For at sikre kreditvurderingsbureauernes uafhængighed (og opfattelsen af dem som uafhængige) bør der derfor fastsættes strengere regler for relationerne mellem kreditvurderingsbureauerne og deres aktionærer eller selskabsdeltagere.
Therefore, in order to ensure the independence (and the perception of independence) of credit rating agencies, it is appropriate to provide for stricter rules regarding the relations between the credit rating agencies and their shareholders or members.
Derfor bør ingen kunne besidde en kapitalandel på 5 % eller derover i mere end et kreditvurderingsbureau på samme tid, medmindre de pågældende kreditvurderingsbureauer tilhører den samme koncern.
For that reason, no person should simultaneously hold a participation of 5 % or more in more than one credit rating agency, unless the credit rating agencies concerned belong to the same group.
Målet om at sikre, at kreditvurderingsbureauerne er tilstrækkeligt uafhængige, kræver, at investorerne ikke har investeringer på 5 % eller derover i mere end et kreditvurderingsbureau på samme tid.
The objective of ensuring sufficient independence of credit rating agencies requires that investors not hold simultaneously investments of 5 % or more in more than one credit rating agency.
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv af 15. december 2004 om harmonisering af gennemsigtighedskrav i forbindelse med oplysninger om udstedere, hvis værdipapirer er optaget til handel på et reguleret marked [10], fastsætter, at personer, som kontrollerer mindst 5 % af stemmerettighederne i et børsnoteret selskab, oplyser dette forhold til offentligheden, bl.a. fordi investorer har interesse i at kende til ændringer i stemmeretsstrukturen i det pågældende selskab.
Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market [10] provides that those persons controlling at least 5 % of the voting rights in a listed company disclose that fact to the public, because, inter alia, the investors have an interest in knowing about changes in the voting structure of such a company.
Grænsen på 5 % anses derfor for at være en større besiddelse af andele, som vil kunne få indflydelse på stemmeretsstrukturen i et selskab.
The 5 % level is therefore considered to be a major holding capable of influencing the voting structure in a company.
Det er derfor hensigtsmæssigt at anvende grænsen på 5 % til begrænsning af samtidig investering i mere end et kreditvurderingsbureau.
It is therefore appropriate to use the 5 % level for the purposes of restricting the simultaneous investment in more than one credit rating agency.
Foranstaltningen kan ikke anses for at være uforholdsmæssig, i betragtning af at alle registrerede kreditvurderingsbureauer i Unionen er ikke-børsnoterede virksomheder og derfor ikke er underlagt de gennemsigtigheds- og procedureregler, der finder anvendelse på børsnoterede selskaber i Unionen i henhold til direktiv 2004/109/EF.
The measure cannot be considered to be disproportionate, given that all registered credit rating agencies in the Union are non-listed undertakings and, therefore, not subject to the transparency and procedural rules that apply to listed companies in the Union in accordance with Directive 2004/109/EC.
Ikke-børsnoterede virksomheder er ofte omfattet af aktionærprotokoller eller -aftaler, og der er som regel tale om få aktionærer eller selskabsdeltagere.
Often unlisted undertakings are governed by shareholders’ protocols or agreements and the number of shareholders or members is usually low.
En minoritetsandel i et ikke-børsnoteret kreditvurderingsbureau kan derfor også få betydning.
Therefore, even a minority position in an unlisted credit rating agency could be influential.
For at sikre, at det stadig er muligt at foretage rent økonomiske investeringer i kreditvurderingsbureauer, bør denne begrænsning af samtidige investeringer i mere end et kreditvurderingsbureau dog ikke gælde for investeringer, der kanaliseres gennem kollektive investeringsordninger, som forvaltes af tredjeparter, der er uafhængige af investoren og ikke kontrolleres af denne.
Nevertheless, in order to ensure that purely economic investments in credit rating agencies are still possible, this limitation to simultaneous investments in more than one credit rating agency should not be extended to investments channelled through collective investment schemes managed by third parties independent from the investor and not subject to the investor’s influence.
Denne forordnings bestemmelser om interessekonflikter med hensyn til aktionærstrukturen bør ikke kun indvirke på direkte aktieposter, men også på indirekte aktieposter, idet disse bestemmelser ellers let ville kunne omgås.
The provisions in this Regulation regarding conflicts of interest with regard to the shareholder structure should not only refer to direct but also to indirect shareholdings as otherwise those rules could be easily circumvented.
Kreditvurderingsbureauer bør gøre deres yderste for at kende deres indirekte aktionærer, så de kan undgå potentielle interessekonflikter i forbindelse hermed.
Credit rating agencies should make all efforts to know their indirect shareholders so that they can avoid any potential conflicts of interest in this respect.
Reglerne om uafhængighed og forebyggelse af interessekonflikter, der indebærer, at kreditvurderingsbureauer ikke kreditvurderer samme udsteder over en lang periode, ville kunne miste deres virkning, hvis kreditvurderingsbureauer havde ret til at være betydelige aktionærer eller selskabsdeltagere i andre kreditvurderingsbureauer.
The effectiveness of the rules on independence and prevention of conflicts of interest which require that credit rating agencies not provide credit rating services to the same issuer for a long period of time could be undermined if credit rating agencies were allowed to become significant shareholders or members of other credit rating agencies.
Det er vigtigt at sikre, at ændringer af vurderingsmetoderne ikke gør metoderne mindre stringente.
It is important to ensure that modifications to the rating methodologies do not result in less rigorous methodologies.
Udstedere, investorer og andre interesserede parter bør derfor have mulighed for at fremsætte bemærkninger til alle påtænkte ændringer af vurderingsmetoder.
For that purpose, issuers, investors and other interested parties should have the opportunity to comment on any intended change to rating methodologies.
Det vil gøre det lettere for dem at forstå baggrunden for de nye metoder og årsagerne til den pågældende ændring.
This will help them to understand the reasons behind new methodologies and for the change in question.
Udstedernes og investorernes bemærkninger til de foreslåede metoder kan være til stor nytte for kreditvurderingsbureauerne ved fastlæggelsen af disse metoder.
Comments provided by issuers and investors on the draft methodologies may provide valuable input for the credit rating agencies in defining the methodologies.
ESMA bør også underrettes om de påtænkte ændringer.
ESMA should also be notified of intended changes.
Selvom forordning (EF) nr. 1060/2009 giver ESMA beføjelse til at kontrollere, at de metoder, som anvendes af kreditvurderingsbureauer, er stringente, systematiske og kontinuerlige, og at de valideres på baggrund af den historiske erfaring, herunder nærmere efterprøvning (»backtesting«), bør denne kontrolproces ikke give ESMA beføjelse til at bedømme den foreslåede metodes egnethed eller indholdet af de kreditvurderinger, der udstedes, efter at metoderne er taget i anvendelse.
Although Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 confers on ESMA the power to verify that methodologies used by credit rating agencies are rigorous, systematic, continuous and subject to validation based on historical experience, including back-testing, that verification process should not grant ESMA any power to judge the appropriateness of the proposed methodology or of the credit ratings issued following the application of the methodologies.
Kreditvurderingsmetoderne bør i givet fald tage hensyn til de finansielle risici, der skyldes miljørisici.
Where appropriate, rating methodologies should take into account financial risks deriving from environmental hazards.
På grund af de strukturerede finansielle instrumenters kompleksitet er det ikke altid lykkedes for kreditvurderingsbureauerne at sikre, at kreditvurderingerne af disse instrumenter er af tilstrækkelig høj kvalitet.
Due to the complexity of structured finance instruments, credit rating agencies have not always succeeded in ensuring a sufficiently high quality of credit ratings issued on such instruments.
Det har svækket markedets tillid til denne type kreditvurderinger.
This has led to a loss of market confidence in this type of credit ratings.
For at genoprette tilliden vil det være hensigtsmæssigt at kræve, at udstederne eller tilknyttede tredjeparter engagerer mindst to forskellige kreditvurderingsbureauer til at kreditvurdere strukturerede finansielle instrumenter, hvilket kan betyde, at der opnås forskellige og konkurrerende vurderinger.
In order to regain confidence it would be appropriate to require issuers or related third parties to engage at least two different credit rating agencies for the provision of credit ratings on structured finance instruments, which could lead to different and competing assessments.
Det vil også kunne reducere den overdrevne afhængighed af enkeltstående kreditvurderinger.
This could also reduce the over-reliance on a single credit rating.
Forslaget til direktiv om adgang til at udøve virksomhed som kreditinstitut og om tilsyn med kreditinstitutter og investeringsselskaber og forslaget til forordning om tilsynskrav for kreditinstitutter og investeringsselskaber, der skal erstatte Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2006/48/EF af 14. juni 2006 om adgang til at optage og udøve virksomhed som kreditinstitut [11] og Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2006/49/EF af 14. juni 2006 om kravene til investeringsselskabers og kreditinstitutters kapitalgrundlag [12], indfører et krav om, at kreditinstitutter og investeringsselskaber selv skal vurdere kreditrisikoen i forbindelse med de enheder og finansielle instrumenter, de investerer i, og at de ikke udelukkende må forlade sig på kreditvurderinger.
The proposal for a directive on the access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms and the proposal for a regulation on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms, which are to replace Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions [11] and Directive 2006/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on the capital adequacy of investment firms and credit institutions [12], introduce a requirement for credit institutions and investment firms to assess the credit risk of entities and financial instruments in which they invest themselves and not simply to rely in this respect on credit ratings.
Dette krav bør også gælde for andre deltagere på det finansielle marked, der er reguleret i EU-lovgivningen, herunder investeringsforvaltere.
That requirement should be extended to other financial market participants regulated under Union law, including investment managers.
For alle deltagere på det finansielle marked bør dette krav imidlertid håndhæves på en forholdsmæssig måde under hensyntagen til arten, omfanget og kompleksiteten af den pågældende deltager.
For all financial market participants, however, that requirement should be enforced in a proportional manner taking into account the nature, scale, and complexity of the participant in question.
Medlemsstaterne bør ikke kunne fastsætte eller opretholde regler, som gør det muligt for disse investorer i højere grad at forlade sig på kreditvurderinger.
Member States should not be entitled to impose or maintain rules that allow stricter reliance by those investors on credit ratings.
Investorerne vil endvidere være i stand til bedre at foretage en kvalificeret vurdering af strukturerede finansielle instrumenters kreditværdighed, hvis investorerne modtager tilstrækkelige oplysninger om disse instrumenter.
Furthermore, the ability of investors to make an informed assessment of the creditworthiness of structured finance instruments would be improved if investors were provided with sufficient information on those instruments.
Da risikoen på strukturerede finansielle instrumenter f.eks. i vidt omfang afhænger af de underliggende aktivers kvalitet og resultater, bør investorerne gives flere oplysninger om de underliggende aktiver.
For example, as the risk on structured finance instruments to a large extent depends on the quality and performance of the underlying assets, investors should be provided with more information on the underlying assets.
Dette ville reducere investorernes afhængighed af kreditvurderinger.
This would reduce investors’ dependence on credit ratings.
Det forventes desuden, at offentliggørelsen af relevante oplysninger om strukturerede finansielle instrumenter vil øge konkurrencen mellem kreditvurderingsbureauerne, fordi det kan føre til et øget antal uopfordrede kreditvurderinger.
Moreover, disclosing relevant information on structured finance instruments is likely to reinforce the competition between credit rating agencies, because it could lead to an increase in the number of unsolicited credit ratings.
Kommissionen bør inden udgangen af januar 2016 vurdere og aflægge rapport om, hvorvidt det er relevant at udvide dette offentliggørelseskrav til andre finansielle produkter.
The Commission should, by January 2016, review and report on the appropriateness of extending the scope of that disclosure requirement to other financial products.
F.eks. er der andre finansielle produkter som f.eks. dækkede obligationer og andre former for sikret gæld, hvor risikoen i vidt omfang afhænger af den underliggende sikkerhedsstillelses karakteristika, og hvor det kunne være relevant give investorerne flere oplysninger om sikkerhedsstillelsen.
For example, there are other financial products, such as covered bonds and other secured debt, where the risk to a large extent depends on the characteristics of any underlying collateral and where it could be relevant to provide investors with more information about the collateral.
Investorer, udstedere og andre interesserede parter bør have adgang til ajourførte kreditvurderingsoplysninger på et centralt websted.
Investors, issuers and other interested parties should have access to up-to-date rating information on a central website.
En europæisk kreditvurderingsplatform bør oprettes af ESMA og bør gøre det muligt for investorerne let at sammenligne alle de kreditvurderinger, der foreligger om en bestemt vurderet enhed.
A European rating platform should be established by ESMA and should allow investors to easily compare all credit ratings that exist with regard to a specific rated entity.
Det er vigtigt, at webstedet for den europæiske kreditvurderingsplatform indeholder alle tilgængelige kreditvurderinger af hvert instrument, for at investorerne kan træffe deres investeringsbeslutning på grundlag af alle de forskellige meningstilkendegivelser.
It is important that the European rating platform website shows all available credit ratings per instrument in order to allow investors to consider the whole variety of opinions before taking their own investment decision.