natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Denne hævdede, at der, eftersom importen fra Indonesien ikke var bæredygtighedscertificeret, og den pris, der forlanges for certificeret biodiesel, var højere, burde foretages en justering.
It claimed that as imports from Indonesia were not RED certified, and that the price quoted for RED certified biodiesel was higher, an adjustment should be made.
Den påstand blev afvist.
That claim was rejected.
Næsten hele importen fra Indonesien i UP var bæredygtighedscertificeret.
Almost all imports from Indonesia during the IP were RED certified.
Under alle omstændigheder havde medlemsstaterne først gennemført bæredygtighedskriterierne i henhold til direktivet om vedvarende energi i deres nationale lovgivning i løbet af 2012, hvilket betyder, at det i det meste af UP ikke havde nogen betydning, om biodiesel var bæredygtighedscertificeret eller ej.
In any case, Member States implemented the sustainability criteria set out in the RED into their national legislation only during the course of 2012, so during most of the IP whether biodiesel was RED certified or not had no effect.
Efter den endelige fremlæggelse fremsatte en indonesisk eksporterende producent bemærkninger om prisunderbudsberegningerne og hævdede, at PME-importen fra Indonesien bør sammenlignes med EU-erhvervsgrenens samlede salg.
Following definitive disclosure, one Indonesian exporting producer commented on the price undercutting calculations and claimed that PME imports from Indonesia should be compared to all sales of the Union industry.
Faktisk har underbudsberegningen været at sammenligne salget af PME fra Indonesien med EU-erhvervsgrenens samlede salg af varer med koldfilterpunkt 0 gennem en forhøjelse af prisen på den indonesiske PME-import med en prisfaktor, som er beregnet ved at sammenligne EU-erhvervsgrenens salg af varer med koldfilterpunkt 0 med EU-erhvervsgrenens salg af varer med koldfilterpunkt 13.
In fact the undercutting calculation has been to compare sales of PME from Indonesia with all sales of the Union industry at CFPP 0, by increasing the price of Indonesian PME imports by a price factor calculated by comparing the CFPP 0 sales of the Union industry with the CFPP 13 sales of the Union industry.
Påstanden fra den samme interesserede part om, at beregningerne af skade omfattede importerede varer, er faktuelt forkert og afvises derfor.
The claim of the same interested party that the injury calculations included imported product is factually incorrect and is therefore rejected.
Under alle omstændigheder blev importeret biodiesel og EU-produceret biodiesel blandet sammen og solgt til samme pris som blandinger, der ikke omfattede importeret biodiesel.
In any case, imported biodiesel and Union-produced biodiesel were blended together and sold at the same price as blends that did not include any imported biodiesel.
En indonesisk eksporterende producent anfægtede også beregningen af omkostninger påløbet efter importen.
One Indonesian exporting producer also challenged the calculation of post-importation costs.
Men disse omkostninger blev kontrolleret som de faktiske omkostninger ved import af biodiesel fratrukket omkostninger til levering til det endelige bestemmelsessted, og ingen ændringer er nødvendige.
However, those costs were verified as the actual costs of importation of biodiesel minus delivery costs to the final destination and no change is necessary.
Som nævnt i betragtning 101 i forordningen om midlertidig told blev følgende makronøkonomiske indikatorer analyseret ud fra indberettede oplysninger for hele EU-erhvervsgrenen: produktion, produktionskapacitet, kapacitetsudnyttelse, salgsmængde, markedsandel, vækst, beskæftigelse, produktivitet, størrelse af dumpingmargenen og genrejsning efter tidligere dumping.
As set out in recital 101 of the provisional Regulation, the following macroeconomic indicators were analysed, based on data received covering the entire Union industry: production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, sales volume, market share, growth, employment, productivity, magnitude of the dumping margin and recovery from past dumping.
Efter den foreløbige fremlæggelse bemærkede EU-erhvervsgrenen, at de kapacitetsoplysninger, som var blevet anvendt i tabel 4 i forordningen om midlertidig told, omfattede kapacitet, der ikke var blevet nedlagt, men som ikke var i en sådan stand, at den ville have været tilgængelig til brug i UP eller i de tidligere år til fremstilling af biodiesel.
Following provisional disclosure the Union industry noted that the capacity data that had been used in Table 4 of the provisional Regulation included capacity that had not been dismantled, but was not in such a state that it would have been available for use during the IP, or previous years, to manufacture biodiesel.
Denne kapacitet blev separat identificeret som »uudnyttet kapacitet«, hvilket ikke bør medregnes som disponibel kapacitet.
They separately identified this capacity as ‘idle capacity’ which should not be counted as capacity available for use.
Tallene for kapacitetsudnyttelse i tabel 4 var derfor undervurderet.
The capacity utilisation figures in Table 4 were therefore understated.
Efter en grundig gennemgang af de genfremsendte oplysninger blev disse godtaget, og tabel 4 er gengivet på ny nedenfor.
After close scrutiny of this resubmitted data, it was accepted and Table 4 is restated below.
Kapacitetsudnyttelsesgraden, som havde været mellem 43 % og 41 % i forordningen om midlertidig told, lå nu mellem 46 % og 55 %.
The capacity utilisation rate, which had been from 43 % to 41 % in the provisional Regulation, was now 46 % to 55 %.
EU-erhvervsgrenen korrigerede også produktionsoplysninger for 2009 til fremstilling af nedenstående tabel:
The Union industry also corrected the production data for 2009 to produce the table below:
I betragtning 103 i den midlertidige forordning analyseredes den tidligere kapacitetsudnyttelse, og det konstateredes, at produktionen steg, mens kapaciteten forblev stabil.
Recital 103 of the provisional Regulation analysed the previous capacity utilisation data, noting that production increased while capacity remained stable.
Med de reviderede oplysninger stiger produktionen fortsat, mens den brugbare kapacitet faldt i samme periode.
With the revised data production still increases, but useable capacity decreased during the same period.
Dette viser, at EU-erhvervsgrenen mindskede den disponible kapacitet på baggrund af den øgede import fra Argentina og Indonesien og dermed reagerede på markedssignalerne.
This shows that the Union industry was reducing available capacity in face of increased imports from Argentina and Indonesia and thereby reacting to market signals.
Disse reviderede oplysninger er nu mere på linje med de offentlige udtalelser fra EU-erhvervsgrenen og EU-producenterne om, at produktionen blev standset i flere anlæg i den betragtede periode, og at kapaciteten, der var installeret, ikke var umiddelbart tilgængelig til brug eller kun kunne anvendes med betydelige reinvesteringer.
This revised data is now more in line with the public statements of the Union industry and Union producers, stating that during the period under consideration production was stopped in several plants and that the capacity that had been installed was not immediately available for use, or only available for use with significant reinvestment.
Flere interesserede parter anfægtede den reviderede kapacitet og kapacitetsudnyttelsesoplysningerne.
Several interested parties questioned the revised capacity and capacity utilisation data.
Men ingen af de interesserede parter foreslog nogen alternativer.
However, no alternatives were provided by any interested party.
Revisionen er baseret på de reviderede kapacitetsoplysninger fra klageren, som dækker hele EU-erhvervsgrenen.
The revision is based on the revised capacity data provided by the complainant, covering the entire Union industry.
De reviderede oplysninger blev krydsrefereret med offentligt tilgængelige oplysninger vedrørende især uudnyttet kapacitet samt kapacitet hos producenter, som indstillede driften på grund af finansielle vanskeligheder.
The revised data was cross-referenced to publicly available data concerning in particular idle capacity as well as capacity of producers that ceased operations due to financial difficulties.
Som forklaret ovenfor i afsnit 6, »Makroøkonomiske indikatorer«, giver de reviderede oplysninger mere nøjagtige data vedrørende den ledige kapacitet til produktion af biodiesel i den betragtede periode end de oprindeligt fremsendte data, som er offentliggjort i forordningen om midlertidig told.
As explained above in Section 6, ‘Macroeconomic indicators’, the revised data provide a more accurate dataset of capacity available to produce biodiesel during the period under consideration than the dataset originally provided and published in the provisional Regulation.
En af de interesserede parter gjorde gældende, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke forvoldtes skade, da produktionsmængderne steg i takt med forbruget.
One interested party stated that the Union industry was not injured, as production volumes rose in line with consumption.
Dette argument afvises, da andre vigtige skadesindikatorer tydeligt viser, at der forekommer skade, navnlig tabet af markedsandel til importen fra de pågældende lande og tendensen til nedsat fortjeneste, hvilket førte til tab.
This argument is rejected, as other important injury indicators clearly point to the existence of injury, in particular the loss of market share to imports from the countries concerned and the reduced profitability trend leading to losses.
En anden interesseret part fremførte, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke forvoldtes skade ved sammenligning alene af udviklingen mellem 2011 og UP i modsætning til en sammenligning af udviklingen i perioden fra 1. januar 2009 til udgangen af UP (»den betragtede periode«).
Another interested party argued that the Union industry was not injured if comparing trends only between 2011 and the IP as opposed to comparing the trends during the period from 1 January 2009 to the end of the IP (‘the period considered’).
Da UP omfatter halvdelen af 2011, er en sammenligning mellem 2011 og UP ikke korrekt.
Given that the IP covers half of 2011, a comparison between 2011 and IP is not accurate.
For at en sammenligning skal give mening, er det desuden nødvendigt at undersøge tendenser med relevans for skadesvurderingen i en tilstrækkelig lang periode, hvilket fandt sted i det foreliggende tilfælde.
Besides, for a comparison to be meaningful it is necessary to examine the trends relevant for the injury assessment during a period which is long enough as it was done in the present case.
Den samme interesserede part bemærkede, at Kommissionen ikke havde offentliggjort den samlede salgsværdi for EU-erhvervsgrenen i forordningen om midlertidig told, og anmodede om, at dette tal blev offentliggjort.
The same interested party noted that the Commission had not published the total sales value of the Union industry in the provisional Regulation and requested that this figure be published.
Alle relevante faktorer, som er nævnt i grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 5, blev imidlertid undersøgt, så der kunne foretages en fuldstændig skadesvurdering.
However, all relevant factors mentioned in Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation were examined, allowing a full assessment of injury.
Oplysninger om salgsværdien blev indsamlet (og verificeret) fra virksomheder i stikprøven, som var repræsentative for EU-erhvervsgrenen som helhed.
Sales value was collected, and verified, from sampled companies, who were representative of the Union industry as a whole.
Den samme part bemærkede også, at EU-erhvervsgrenen var i stand til at øge beskæftigelsen, og at der derfor ikke var nogen negativ indvirkning på EU-erhvervsgrenen i undersøgelsesperioden.
The same party also noted that the Union industry was able to increase employment and therefore there was no negative effect on the Union industry during the period of investigation.
Men som beskrevet i betragtning 106 i forordningen om midlertidig told, er beskæftigelsen i denne kapitalintensive industri forholdsvis lav.
However, as explained in recital 106 of the provisional Regulation, employment in this capital intensive industry is relatively low.
Derfor kan små udsving i tallene medføre store ændringer i de indekserede data.
Therefore, small variations in the numbers can cause a large movement in the indexed data.
Stigningen i den samlede beskæftigelse opvejer ikke den skade, EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt, som det fremgår af andre indikatorer.
The increase in overall employment does not negate the injury suffered by the Union industry as shown by other indicators.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 103-110 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any further comments, recitals 103 to 110 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Som beskrevet i betragtning 102 i forordningen om midlertidig told blev følgende mikroøkonomiske indikatorer analyseret ud fra kontrollerede oplysninger fra de stikprøveudtagne EU-producenter: gennemsnitlige enhedspriser, enhedsomkostninger, lønomkostninger, lagerbeholdninger, rentabilitet, likviditet, investeringer, investeringsafkast og evne til at rejse kapital.
As set out in recital 102 of the provisional Regulation, the following microeconomic indicators were analysed, based on data verified at the sampled Union producers: average unit prices, unit cost, labour costs, inventories, profitability, cash flow, investments, return on investments and ability to raise capital.
Da der ikke er fremsat relevante bemærkninger hertil, bekræftes betragtning 111-117 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any relevant comments, recitals 111 to 117 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Flere parter gjorde indsigelse mod konklusionen om skade, som blev fremsat i forordningen om midlertidig told, med den begrundelse, at en række indikatorer tilsyneladende var forbedret mellem 2011 og UP.
Several parties contested the conclusion on injury put forward in the provisional Regulation on the basis that between the year 2011 and the IP some indicators appeared to have improved.
Selv om det er rigtigt, at udviklingen for en række indikatorer gik i positiv retning mellem 2011 og UP (f.eks. produktion og salg), var erhvervsgrenen ikke i stand til at overføre omkostningsstigningerne i denne periode, som anført i betragtning 111 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
While it is true that some indicators showed an upward trend between 2011 and the IP (e.g., production and sales), the industry was not in a position to pass on cost increases during this period as noted in recital 111 of the provisional Regulation.
Dette resulterede i en yderligere forværring af EF-erhvervsgrenens situation fra tab på 0,2 % i 2011 til tab på 2,5 % i UP.
This resulted in a further worsening of the industry’s position from losses of 0,2 % in 2011 to losses of 2,5 % in the IP.
Det konkluderes derfor, at selv om skadesanalysen blev begrænset til perioden 2011-UP, ville erhvervsgrenen stadig blive anset for at have lidt væsentlig skade.
Therefore, it is considered that, even if the injury analysis were to be limited to the period 2011-IP, the industry would still be found to have suffered material injury.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 118-120 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of other comments, recitals 118 to 120 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
En interesseret part hævdede, at importen fra Argentina ikke kunne være årsag til skade, da importmængden havde været stabil fra 2010 til udgangen af UP og let faldende fra 2011 til udgangen af UP.
One interested party claimed that imports from Argentina could not be a cause of injury, as import volumes have remained stable from 2010 to the end of the IP, decreasing slightly from 2011 to the end of the IP.
Disse oplysninger stammer fra tabel 2 i forordningen om midlertidig told og er korrekte.
This data was taken from Table 2 of the provisional Regulation and is accurate.
Kommissionens analyse løber imidlertid fra begyndelsen af den betragtede periode til udgangen af UP, og på dette grundlag er importen steget med 48 %, hvilket er en stigning på 41 % i markedsandel.
However the Commission’s analysis runs from the start of the period considered to the end of the IP and on that basis imports have risen by 48 %, with an increase of 41 % in market share.
Desuden blev ikke blot importen fra Argentina, men også importen fra Indonesien taget i betragtning, jf. betragtning 90 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In addition, as explained in recital 90 of the provisional Regulation, not only imports from Argentina but also imports from Indonesia were taken into account.
I forbindelse med en år til år-prissammenligning anførte den samme interesserede part, at prisen på importen fra Argentina steg i et hurtigere tempo end EU-erhvervsgrenens salgspriser.
Taking a year-on-year price comparison, the same interested party noted that prices of imports from Argentina rose at a faster pace than the sales prices of the Union industry.
Priserne på importen fra Argentina ligger dog stadig under EU-erhvervsgrenens priser, hvilket kan forklare, hvorfor Unionens priser ikke kunne stige lige så hurtigt.
However, imports from Argentina still undercut those of the Union industry, which would explain why the Union prices could not rise as quickly.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger til dumpingimportens virkninger, bekræftes betragtning 123-128 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any other comments as regards the effect of the dumped imports, recitals 123 to 128 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Import fra andre tredjelande end de pågældende lande
Imports from third countries other than the countries concerned
Da der ikke er fremsat bemærkninger, bekræftes konklusionen om, at importen fra andre lande ikke forårsagede skade, som anført i betragtning 129 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of comments, the conclusion that imports from other countries did not cause injury, as set out in recital 129 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Efter anvendelse af artikel 2, stk. 5, som nævnt i betragtning 38 og 70 ovenfor, blev der ikke konstateret nogen import, der ikke var dumpet, fra de pågældende lande.
Following the application of Article 2(5) as mentioned in recitals 38 and 70 above, no non-dumped imports from the countries concerned were found.
Derfor bekræftes betragtning 130 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
Therefore, recital 130 of the provisional Regulation is revised accordingly.
Da der ikke er fremsat bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 131 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any comments recital 131 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Som anført i betragtning 132-136 i forordningen om midlertidig told importerede EU-erhvervsgrenen biodiesel fra de pågældende lande i den betragtede periode i betydelige mængder på op til 60 % af den samlede import i UP fra disse lande.
As set out in recitals 132 to 136 of the provisional Regulation, the Union industry imported significant quantities of biodiesel from the countries concerned during the period considered, up to 60 % of all imports in the IP from those countries.
En interesseret part hævdede, at denne import, der slet ikke var selvforsvar, var en del af en omhyggeligt forberedt langsigtet strategi fra EU-erhvervsgrenens side med henblik på at investere og hente biodiesel i Argentina.
One interested party alleged that these imports, far from being in self-defence, were part of a ‘carefully matured long-term strategy’ by the Union industry to invest in, and source biodiesel from, Argentina.
De påstår desuden, at der aldrig har været nogen økonomisk begrundelse for at importere sojabønneolie til Unionen og forarbejde den til biodiesel i Unionen, og at det kun er økonomisk muligt at forarbejde sojabønneolien i Argentina og eksportere den fremkomne biodiesel.
They also allege that there has never been an economic rationale to import soya bean oil into the Union and process it into biodiesel within the Union, and that it is only economically feasible to process the soya bean oil in Argentina and export the resulting biodiesel.
Disse påstande må afvises.
These claims should be rejected.
Der er ikke fremlagt nogen dokumentation for en sådan langsigtet strategi, som også er blevet afvist af EU-erhvervsgrenen.
No evidence of such a ‘long-term strategy’ has been provided and this has been denied by the Union industry.
Hvis EU-erhvervsgrenens strategi var at supplere deres biodieselproduktion ved at producere i Argentina og importere den færdige vare, ville det tydeligvis være meningsløst og ulogisk efterfølgende at indgive en klage over denne import.
Clearly if the strategy of the Union industry was to supplement their biodiesel production by producing in Argentina and importing the finished product, it would be nonsensical and illogical to then launch a complaint against such imports.
En interesseret part gentog, at EU-erhvervsgrenens import af biodiesel, der blev foretaget som selvforsvar, i virkeligheden blev foretaget som led i en langsigtet handelsstrategi.
One interested party repeated that the imports of biodiesel by the Union industry, that were made in self-defence, were in fact made as part of a long-term commercial strategy.
Denne påstand, som ikke var underbygget, afvises.
This allegation, which was not substantiated, is rejected.
Der er ikke fremlagt nogen dokumentation ud over rene påstande for en sådan strategi.
No evidence beyond mere allegations has been provided of such a strategy.
Det ville også forekomme ulogisk for de berørte EU-producenter at støtte klagen, og i visse tilfælde have øget deres kapacitet i Unionen, og samtidig have en strategi, der har til formål at opfylde produktionsbehovet gennem import.
Also, it would seem illogical for the concerned Union producers to support the complaint and, in some cases, to have increased its capacity in the Union while at the same time have a strategy to fulfil production needs by imports.
Den samme interesserede part hævdede også, at EU-erhvervsgrenens markedsandel bør beregnes ved at medtage importen, der er foretaget som forsvar.
The same interested party also argued that the market share of the Union industry should be calculated by including their imports made in self-defence.
Dette argument blev afvist, da markedsandelsberegninger skal afspejle EU-erhvervsgrenens salg af varer, de selv har produceret, og ikke deres handelsaktiviteter i forbindelse med den færdige vare på baggrund af de stigende mængder af dumpingimport.
This submission was rejected as market share calculations have to reflect the sales of the Union industry of goods they produced themselves and not their trading activities in the finished product made in the face of increasing volumes of dumped imports.
EU-erhvervsgrenen har også vist, at det inden for de seneste år har været økonomisk rentabelt at importere sojabønneolie — og palmeolie — med henblik på forarbejdning til biodiesel.
The Union industry has also shown that in previous years the importation of soya bean oil — and palm oil — for processing into biodiesel was economically viable.
Den interesserede part fremlagde ikke dokumentation for det modsatte.
No evidence of the contrary was provided by the interested party.
Kun med den fordrejende virkning af den differentierede eksportafgiftsordning, som gør eksport af biodiesel billigere end råmaterialerne, bliver importen af den færdige vare økonomisk rentabel.
Only with the distortive effect of the differential export tax which makes the export of biodiesel cheaper than the raw materials does import of the finished product become economically sensible.