natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Især hævdede en part, at mangler i svaret fra producenten i referencelandet burde diskvalificere Brasilien som referenceland, og at undersøgelsen burde afsluttes, da Kommissionen ikke kan fastsætte den normale værdi.
In particular, one party claimed that deficiencies in the reply of the analogue country producer should disqualify Brazil as an analogue country and the investigation should be terminated since the Commission cannot establish the normal value.
I denne forbindelse skal det bemærkes, at Kommissionen i den aktuelle undersøgelse havde alle de nødvendige oplysninger til at foretage en dumpingberegning.
In this respect it is noted that in the current investigation the Commission did have all the necessary information to perform a dumping calculation.
Derfor kunne påstandene vedrørende egnetheden af Brasilien som referenceland ikke accepteres.
Consequently, the claims concerning the suitability of Brazil as an analogue country could not be accepted.
Med hensyn til kravene om justeringer, kan det konstateres, at der er taget hensyn til forskellene i handelsled mellem den brasilianske producent og den eksporterende kinesiske producent ved hjælp af en justering for handelsled (jf. betragtning 59 nedenfor).
With regard to the claims for adjustments, it is noted that the level of trade differences between the Brazilian producer and the Chinese exporting producer has been accounted for by means of a level of trade adjustment (see recital 59 below).
Endelig hævdede en part, at der burde foretages en justering for at tage hensyn til en angiveligt fordrejende virkning af referencelandets importtold på 14 %.
Finally, one party claimed that an adjustment should be made to account for an allegedly distorting effect of the 14 % import duty in the analogue country.
Denne påstand kan ikke accepteres, da der ikke kan konstateres nogen forbindelse mellem importtolden som sådan og prisniveauet på hjemmemarkedet.
This claim cannot be accepted as no link can be established between an import duty as such and the price level on the domestic market.
Brasilien anses derfor for et egnet referenceland, fordi der hersker tilstrækkelig konkurrence med mindst to producenter og en betydelig import.
Consequently, Brazil is considered an appropriate analogue country since there is sufficient competition with at least two producers and a significant level of imports.
I henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 2, undersøgte Kommissionen først, om Paletrans' salg af samme vare til uafhængige kunder var repræsentativt.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether Paletrans’ domestic sales of the like product to independent customers were representative.
I denne forbindelse konstateredes det, at den samlede mængde af dette salg udgjorde mindst 5 % af den samlede mængde af Noblelifts eksportsalg til Unionen.
In this respect, it was found that the total volume of such sales was equal to at least 5 % of the total volume of Noblelift’s export sales to the Union.
Kommissionen undersøgte efterfølgende, om der findes typer af samme vare, som blev solgt på hjemmemarkedet af Paletrans, der var tilstrækkeligt sammenlignelige, i funktioner og de materialer, der er anvendt, til de typer, der solgtes af Noblelift til eksport til Unionen.
The Commission subsequently examined whether there are types of the like product sold domestically by Paletrans that were sufficiently comparable in terms of functions and materials used to the types sold by Noblelift for export to the Union.
Undersøgelsen viste, at en række typer, der solgtes på hjemmemarkedet af Paletrans var tilstrækkeligt sammenlignelige med de typer, der eksporteres af Noblelift til Unionen.
The investigation established that a number of types sold domestically by Paletrans were sufficiently comparable with the types exported by Noblelift to the Union.
Kommissionen undersøgte dernæst for producenten i referencelandet, om hver type af samme vare, som blev solgt på hjemmemarkedet, kunne anses for at være solgt i normal handel.
The Commission subsequently examined for the analogue country producer whether each comparable type of the like product sold domestically could be considered as being sold in the ordinary course of trade.
Dette blev gjort ved at fastsætte andelen af fortjenstgivende salg for hver varetype til uafhængige kunder på hjemmemarkedet i NUP.
This was done by establishing for each product type the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market during the RIP.
Dette var tilfældet for alle de sammenlignelige typer, og den normale værdi blev beregnet som et vejet gennemsnit af priserne på alt salg på hjemmemarkedet af hver tilsvarende varetype i NUP.
This was the case for all comparable types and the normal value was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of each comparable type made during the RIP.
For ikke-sammenlignelige typer kunne den normale værdi fastsættes i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 3, ved at lægge produktionsomkostningerne, om nødvendigt med justeringer, sammen med en rimelig procentdel for salgs- og administrationsomkostninger og andre generalomkostninger og en rimelig margen for fortjeneste på hjemmemarkedet.
For non-comparable types the normal value could be constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation by adding to the manufacturing cost, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable percentage for domestic selling, general and administrative expenses and a reasonable margin for domestic profit.
Salgs-, general- og administrationsomkostninger og fortjeneste blev fastsat på grundlag af faktiske oplysninger i forbindelse med produktion og salg i normal handel af samme vare fra producenten i referencelandet.
The selling, general and administrative expenses and the profit were based on actual data pertaining to production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, for the like product, by the producer in the analogue country.
Det bør bemærkes, at prisen, der blev udregnet på dette grundlag, var underlagt de justeringer, som er beskrevet i betragtning 59, navnlig for at tage hensyn til forskellen i handelsled mellem Noblelifts eksportsalg og salget på hjemmemarkedet hos producenten i referencelandet.
It should be noted that the price constructed on that basis was subject to the adjustments described in recital 59, in particular to take account of the difference in level of trade between export sales by Noblelift and the domestic sales of the analogue country producer.
Den eneste samarbejdende eksporterende producent hævdede, at Kommissionen har foretaget dumpingberegninger på grundlag af »afkortede varekontrolnumre«, og at der ikke blev givet nogen forklaringer vedrørende de parametre, der anvendtes til at foretage sammenligningen.
The sole cooperating exporting producer claimed that the Commission performed dumping calculations on the basis of ‘truncated PCNs’ and that no explanations were provided concerning the parameters used for conducting the comparison.
I overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 11, fastslås dumpingmargenen normalt på grundlag af en sammenligning af det vejede gennemsnit af den normale værdi og det vejede gennemsnit af priserne for alle eksporttransaktioner i henhold til de relevante bestemmelser om en rimelig sammenligning.
According to Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation the dumping margin is normally established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average of prices of all export transactions subject to the relevant provisions governing fair comparison.
Hvad angår en rimelig sammenligning skal det bemærkes, at varekontrolnummeret er et redskab, der anvendes i undersøgelsen til at strukturere og organisere den væsentlige mængde af yderst detaljerede oplysninger, som virksomhederne fremsender.
With regard to the fair comparison, it has to be noted that the product control number is a tool used in the investigation in order to structure and organise the substantial amounts of very detailed data submitted by the companies.
Det bidrager til at foretage en mere detaljeret analyse af forskellige produktegenskaber inden for kategorien af den pågældende vare og den samme vare.
It is an aid to conduct a more detailed analysis of different product characteristics within the category of the product concerned and the like product.
Kommissionen har indsamlet oplysninger i forbindelse med en række parametre (chassismateriale, malet stel, løftekapacitet, typen af hydraulisk system, arbejdslængde, gaffel, gaffelbredde, styrehjulsmateriale, gaffelhjulsmateriale, gaffelhjulstype og bremsetype), men for at tage hensyn til alle eksporttransaktionerne blev det anset for rimeligt, og det var muligt at basere sammenligningen i dette tilfælde på visse af disse parametre, der udgør de mest relevante egenskaber (chassismateriale, malet stel, styrehjulsmateriale, gaffelhjulsmateriale, gaffelhjulstype).
The Commission has collected information in relation to a number of parameters (chassis material, chassis painted, lift capacity, type of hydraulic system, working length, fork, width over forks, steering wheel material, load wheel material, load wheel type, brake type) but in order to take into consideration all export transactions it was considered reasonable and it was found possible to base the comparison in this case on certain of those parameters that constitute the most pertinent characteristics (chassis material, chassis painted, steering wheel material, load wheel material, load wheel type).
Derfor var sammenligningen baseret på de mest relevante egenskaber for at øge overensstemmelsen og for at sikre en rimelig sammenligning.
Therefore, the comparison was based on the most pertinent characteristics in order to increase the matching and to ensure a fair comparison.
Det skal understreges, at Kommissionen ikke så bort fra nogen oplysninger.
It has to be stressed that the Commission did not disregard any information.
Det er dog ikke ualmindeligt, at nogle af de parametre, der anvendes i varekontrolnummeret, er mindre væsentlige, og at nogle specifikke parametre danner et bedre sammenligningsgrundlag end andre.
However, it is not uncommon that certain parameters used in the product control number have a lesser weight and that specific parameters more than others form a better basis for fair comparison.
Der er i sammenligningen ikke set bort fra produkter på grundlag af fysiske forskelle eller af andre grunde, og der er heller ikke skabt nye varetyper.
No products have been disregarded from the comparison on the basis of physical differences or for any other reasons, nor have any new product types been created.
Tværtimod omfattede sammenligningen alle former for salg.
On the contrary, all sales were included in the comparison.
Selv om det erkendtes, at andre parametre havde en vis indvirkning på priserne, blev det anset for mere hensigtsmæssigt at basere beregningerne på de fem mest relevante parametre, da det førte til den største grad af overensstemmelse.
While it was acknowledged that other parameters had some impact on prices, it was found more appropriate that the calculations should be based on the five most relevant parameters as this led to the highest level of matching.
Med hensyn til de proceduremæssige aspekter af sammenligningen skal det bemærkes, at den eksporterende producent fik fuld lejlighed til at kommentere de foretagne beregninger i denne sag.
As far as procedural aspects of the comparison are concerned, it has to be noted that the exporting producer was provided with full opportunity to comment on the calculations performed in this case.
Fuldstændige oplysninger om beregningerne blev fremlagt og genfremlagt.
Full details of the calculations have been disclosed and redisclosed.
Påstandene måtte derfor afvises.
Consequently, the foregoing claims had to be rejected.
Hele eksportsalget til EU fra den kinesiske eksporterende producent fandt sted direkte til uafhængige kunder i Unionen.
All export sales to the Union of the Chinese exporting producer were made directly to independent customers in the Union.
Derfor blev eksportprisen fastsat på grundlag af de priser, der faktisk blev betalt eller skulle betales for den pågældende vare, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 8.
Therefore, the export price was established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
En part hævdede, at eksportsalg af chassis og hydraulisk anordninger skulle have været medtaget i beregningen.
One party claimed that the export sales of chassis and hydraulics should have been included in the calculation.
Denne påstand er blevet godtaget.
That claim has been accepted.
Til dette formål blev der foretaget justeringer, hvor dette var relevant og berettiget, for forskelle i handelsled (den anslåede prisforskel for salg til forskellige typer kunder på hjemmemarkedet i referencelandet), transport (omfattende indenlandsk fragt i eksportlandet og søtransport med henblik på transport til Unionen), forsikringsomkostninger (søforsikringsomkostninger), håndtering, lastning og dermed forbundne omkostninger, kommission (betalt for eksportsalget), bankgebyrer (betalt for eksportsalget), kreditomkostninger (baseret på de aftalte betalingsbetingelser, og den gældende rente) og emballeringsomkostninger (omkostninger ved emballagematerialer).
For this purpose, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made, where applicable and justified, for differences in level of trade (estimated price difference for sales to different type of customers in the domestic market of the analogue country), transport (comprising inland freight cost in the exporting country and ocean freight for transportation to the Union), insurance (ocean insurance cost), handling, loading and ancillary costs, commissions (paid for export sales), bank charges (paid for export sales), credit costs (based on the agreed payment terms and the prevailing interest rate) and packing costs (cost of packing materials used).
Efter et krav fra den eneste samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producent, blev en justering foretaget for den normale værdi, da det ansås for rimeligt, for forskellene i tykkelse af det stål, der anvendtes af producenten i referencelandet, og det der anvendtes af den eksporterende producent fra det pågældende land.
Following a claim from the sole cooperating exporting producer, an adjustment for the differences in thickness of steel used by the producer in the analogue country and the exporting producer in the country concerned was made to the normal value, as it was found reasonable.
Justeringen blev baseret på forskellen i tykkelse i forhold til stålets virkning på den samme vares pris solgt i Brasilien af producenten i referencelandet.
The adjustment was based on the difference in thickness in proportion to the contribution of steel to the price of the like product sold in Brazil by the analogue country producer.
Dette førte til en ændring af dumpingmargenen (jf. betragtning 73 nedenfor).
This led to a change in the dumping margin (see recital 73 below).
Efter yderligere en fremlæggelse af oplysninger (hvorved der opfordredes til afgivelse af bemærkninger vedrørende justeringen for ståls tykkelse), anfægtede en part denne justering som manglende et faktuelt grundlag.
Following an additional disclosure (inviting comments on the steel thickness adjustment), one party contested that adjustment as lacking factual basis.
Parten påpegede endvidere, at den eksporterende producents ikke-fortrolige bemærkninger om justeringen, var mangelfulde, således at de krænkede andre parters ret til at forsvare sig.
It also pointed out that the exporting producer’s non-confidential submissions seeking the adjustment were deficient thereby violating other parties’ rights of defence.
Kommissionen efterprøvede oplysningerne i sagen, hvorpå justeringen for stålets tykkelse var baseret, og bekræftede, at den var berettiget.
The Commission verified the data on file on which the steel thickness adjustment was based and confirmed that it was warranted.
Den eneste samarbejdsvillige eksportør fremlagde krav om flere andre justeringer som følge af forskelle i effektivitet og produktivitet og hævdede bl.a., at producenten i referencelandet var mindre produktiv (havde et lavere output pr. arbejdstager) og havde et højere forbrug af råstoffer pr. enhed.
The sole cooperating exporter presented claims for several other adjustments due to differences in efficiency and productivity, claiming, inter alia, that the producer in the analogue country was less productive (has a lower output per worker) and had higher consumption of raw materials per unit.
Det bemærkes indledningsvis, at mens forskelle i effektivitet eller produktivitet kan findes mellem virksomheder, er det vejledende princip at sikre sammenlignelighed mellem eksportpriserne og den normale værdi, hvilket ikke kræver, at de nærmere omstændigheder, i forbindelse med en producent i et referenceland og en eksporterende producent i et land uden markedsøkonomi, er helt på linje med hinanden.
It has to be noted at the outset that while differences in efficiency or productivity might exist between companies, the guiding principle is to ensure comparability between export prices and normal value, which does not require that the circumstances of an analogue country producer and an exporting producer in a non-market economy country are completely aligned.
Faktisk er det kun forskelle i faktorer, der påvirker priserne og prissammenligneligheden mellem en producent i et referenceland og en eksporterende producent i et land uden markedsøkonomi, der berettiger til at foretage en justering.
Indeed, only differences for factors affecting prices and price comparability between an analogue country producer and an exporting producer in a non-market economy country warrant an adjustment.
Ikke desto mindre skal det bemærkes, at undersøgelsen ikke afslørede nogen omstændigheder, der tyder på, at producenten i referencelandet ikke havde en rimelig effektiv produktionsproces.
Nevertheless, it has to be pointed out that the investigation did not reveal any circumstances which would suggest that the producer in the analogue country did not have a reasonably efficient production process.
En lavere brug af arbejdskraft er ofte et resultat af en øget automatisering, hvilket igen fører til højere omkostninger i andre områder (afskrivning, kapital, finansiering, faste fremstillingsomkostninger).
Indeed, a lower use of labour is often the result of a higher level of automation, which in turn leads to higher costs in other areas (depreciation, capital, financing, manufacturing overheads).
Kun en omfattende analyse kunne afdække alle forskellene i omkostningsfaktorer og påvise, om priserne og prisernes sammenlignelighed er berørt, hvorved en justering kan være berettiget.
Only a comprehensive analysis could reveal all differences in cost factors and demonstrate whether prices and price comparability are affected, thereby justifying an adjustment.
Påstandene kan derfor ikke godtages.
The claims cannot therefore be accepted.
Ud over ovenstående var kravene ubegrundede, hvad angår justering for forskel pr. energienhed og justering for værdiforringelse og forskelle i fremstillingsomkostninger pr. enhed.
In addition to the foregoing, the claims for adjustment for a per-unit energy difference and for a per-unit depreciation and manufacturing overheads difference were unsubstantiated.
Navnlig, hvad angår energieffektivitet blev der ikke redegjort for, hvilke elementer i produktionsprocessen der gør den brasilianske producent ineffektiv sammenlignet med den eneste samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producent.
In particular, in relation to energy efficiency it was not explained what elements in the production process make the Brazilian producer inefficient as compared to the sole cooperating exporting producer.
Størrelsen af justeringen blev baseret på en ratio af forskelle i arbejdskraftomkostninger pr. enhed (baseret på produktivitetsforskelle) i forhold til andelen af arbejdskraftomkostninger sat i forhold til de samlede omkostninger.
The amount of the adjustment was based on a ratio of labour cost difference per unit (based on productivity difference) related to the share of labour cost in total cost.
Forbindelsen mellem disse forhold og forskelle i energieffektivitet og afskrivninger og fremstillingsomkostninger var ikke forklaret og var uforståelig.
The link between such ratio and energy efficiency and depreciation and manufacturing overheads difference had not been explained and was not understandable.
Påstandene afvises derfor.
The claims are thus rejected.
En part hævdede også, at der burde justeres for andre parametre, som for eksempel løftekapacitet og gaffel.
One party also claimed that adjustments should be made for parameters, inter alia, such as lift capacity and fork.
Der henvises i denne henseende til bemærkninger om parametrene for sammenligning (jf. betragtning 50 ovenfor), hvor det konstateredes, at sammenligningen er baseret på de mest relevante parametre for at sikre den største grad af overensstemmelse.
In this respect, reference is made to comments concerning the parameters of comparison (see recital 50 above) where it is noted that a comparison is based on the most relevant parameters to ensure the highest level of matching.
Under alle omstændigheder var kravene ikke dokumenterede.
In any case the claims were not substantiated.
En anden påstand var, at der burde foretages justeringer, fordi den eksporterende producent bruger patenteret teknologi.
Another claim was that adjustment should be made due to the fact that the exporting producer uses patented technology.
Denne påstand er ikke blevet yderligere uddybet.
This claim has not been further substantiated.
Det skal bemærkes, at den eksporterende producent ikke har kunnet kvantificere justeringen.
Notably, the exporting producer failed to quantify the adjustment.
Den eneste oplysning, der blev forelagt, var et dokument, der erklæredes at være patentet.
The only piece of information provided was a document which was stated to be the patent.
I et senere brev blev justeringen delvis kvantificeret, men uden nogen dokumentation herfor.
In a later submission the adjustment was partially quantified but without any supporting evidence.
Dette krav kunne derfor ikke accepteres.
Therefore, the claim could not be accepted.
Desuden blev kravet om justering for forskelle ved effektiv brug af råstoffer dækket af justeringen for tykkelse af stål (jf. betragtning 60 ovenfor), eftersom brugen af forskellige tykkelser stål kan føre til et lavere samlet forbrug af stål.
Furthermore, the claim for adjustment for difference in efficiency in use of raw materials has been covered by the adjustment for thickness of steel (see recital 60 above), as the use of different steel thickness might lead to a lower overall consumption of steel.
Endelig har den eksporterende producent fremført, at den solgte gennem salgskanaler, navnlig ikke-mærkevarer på grundlag af at være originaludstyrsfabrikant (OEM), der er forskellige fra producenten i referencelandets salgskanaler.
Finally, the exporting producer stated that it sold via a sales channel, in particular non-branded products on an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) basis, different from that of the producer in the analogue country.
Derfor blev et krav om en justering svarende til denne forskel fremsat.
Accordingly, a claim for an adjustment reflecting this difference was put forward.
Som nævnt ovenfor (betragtning 59) blev der foretaget en justering for handelsled.
As specified above (recital 59), a level of trade adjustment was made.
Den var baseret på en anslået prisforskel for salg til forskellige typer kunder, herunder OEM-salg, på hjemmemarkedet i referencelandet.
It was based on an estimated price difference for sales to different types of customers, including OEM sales, in the domestic market of the analogue country.