natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I klausul 1 i den nye public service-aftale fastlægges det, at RTP er eneste leverandør af public service-tv i henhold til artikel 5 i lov nr. 58/90 og til artikel 4 i lov nr. 21/92.
Clause 1 of the new public service contract states that RTP is the sole provider of public service broadcasting within the meaning of Article 5 of Law No 58/90 and of Article 4 of Law No 21/92.
Klausul 9 i den tidligere og klausul 23 i den nye public service-aftale.
Clause 9 of the old public service contract and Clause 23 of the new public service contract.
Klausul 15, 16, 18 og 19 i den tidligere og klausul 18 og 25 i den nye public service-aftale.
Clauses 15, 16, 18 and 19 of the old public service contract and Clauses 18 and 25 of the new public service contract.
Klausul 19 i den tidligere og klausul 25 i den nye public service-aftale samt artikel 47, stk. 2, i lov nr. 31 A/98.
Clause 19 of the old public service contract, Clause 25 of the new public service contract and Article 47(2) of Law No 31-A/98.
Revisors fulde navn er: »Pedro Roque SROC, Revisores Oficias de Contas, inscrita na Lista das SROC/s com no 125«, Lissabon.
The full name of the auditor is: ‘Pedro Roque SROC, Revisores Oficias de Contas, inscrita na Lista das SROC/s com no 125’, Lisbon.
Der er tale om en godkendt revisor, der er registreret i den officielle fortegnelse over revisorer i Portugal, hvilket indebærer, at revisoren skal overholde visse revisionsstandarder og afgive en uafhængig revisionspåtegning.
It is a statutory auditor registered in the official list of auditors in Portugal, which means the auditor has to adhere to certain auditing standards and give an independent audit view.
BDO Binder&Co. Auditoria, Impostos e Consultoria, Lissabon, Portugal.
BDO Binder & Co. Auditoria, Impostos e Consultoria, Lisbon, Portugal.
Klausul 13 i den tidligere og klausul 20 i den nye public service-aftale.
Clause 13 of the old public service contract and Clause 20 of the new public service contract.
Klausul 14 i den tidligere og klausul 21 i den nye public service-aftale.
Clause 14 of the old public service contract and Clause 21 of the new public service contract.
Klausul 12 i den tidligere public service-aftale fastlægger nærmere de udgifter, der kan kompenseres, og beregningsmetoden herfor: dækningsdifferencen (forskellen mellem RTP 1's udgifter og udgifter afholdt af den største private tv-operatør), driftstab for de selvstyrende regioner, driftstab for de audiovisuelle arkiver, driftsudgifter for RTP-Internacional, driftsudgifter for det internationale samarbejde med portugisisksprogede afrikanske lande, udgifter fra gratis sendetid til bestemte enheder, udgifter til afdelinger og korrespondenter samt udgifter til Fundação do Teatro de São Carlos.
Clause 12 of the old public service contract lays down in detail which costs may be compensated for and how they are to be calculated: the coverage differential (the difference in costs borne by RTP Channel 1 and the costs borne by the largest private television operator), the operating deficit in the Autonomous Regions, the deficit in running the audiovisual library, the operational cost of RTP-International, the cost of operating the structure for cooperation with the Portuguese-speaking African countries (PALOPs), the cost of allowing viewing time for certain entities, the cost of delegations and correspondents, and the costs of the S. Carlos National Theatre Foundation.
Klausul 15 i den nye public service-aftale fastlægger nærmere de udgifter, der skal kompenseres, og beregningsmetoden herfor.
Clause 15 of the new public service contract lays down in detail which costs can be compensated for and how they are to be calculated.
De udgifter, der skal omfattes, er: 1) driftsudgifter for RTP 1 og RTP 2, 2) forpligtelser til særlige tjenesteydelser som omhandlet i klausul 7, stk. 1, litra a)-l), og 3) dækningsdifferencen.
The items to be covered are: (1) the operating costs of RTP 1 and RTP 2; (2) specific services referred to in Clause 7(a) to (l); and (3) the coverage differential.
Oplysninger fra Portugal i brev af 31. marts 1999.
Information provided by Portugal by letter of 31 March 1999.
Klausul 14, stk. 2, i den nye public service-aftale.
Clause 14(2) of the new public service contract.
Stk. 1 og 3 i klausul 19 i den nye public service-aftale.
Clause 19(1) and (3) of the new public service contract.
Den nye public service-aftale fastlægger, at udgifter til drift af RTP2 vil kunne kompenseres med tilbagevirkende kraft fra den 1. januar 1996.
The new public service contract provided that the operating costs of RTP 2 could be compensated for retroactively from 1 January 1996.
Selv om sports-tv ikke er en kompensationsberettiget public service, trak RTP overskuddet fra sports-tv fra udgifterne i forbindelse med public service.
Although Sport TV is not a public service activity eligible for compensation, RTP deducted the profits of Sport TV from the public service cost.
Grundlaget herfor er artikel 47, stk. 3, i lov nr. 31-A/98 af 14. juli 1998, som fastlægger, at RTP's overskud fra drift eller deltagelse i andre kanaler skal tjene til finansiering af public service-aktiviteter.
The basis for this deduction is Article 47(3) of Law No 31-A/98 of 14 July 1998, which provides that profits made by RTP from participation in other channels are to be used for the financing of public service initiatives.
Bemærkninger fra andre interesserede parter om andre foranstaltninger findes i betragtning 74 til 84 i beslutning 2005/406/EF.
Comments from interested parties on other measures can be found in recitals 74 to 84 of Decision 2005/406/EC.
Se, f.eks., Rui Gerra da Fonseca: Når retskarakteren af en offentlig virksomheds vedtægter er fastlagt på grundlag af et lovdekret, er det forfatningsstridigt at ændre dem ved et andet retsinstrument end et lovdekret, lige som regler, der tillader ændring heraf gennem et privatretligt instrument, er forfatningsstridige, Autonomia Estatutária das Empresas Publicas e Descentralização Administrativa, Coimbra 2005.
See, for instance, Rui Gerra da Fonseca: Having established the legislative nature of the statutes of a public undertaking based on a decree law, it is unconstitutional for them to be amended by any instrument other than a decree law, just as rules permitting their amendment by a mere instrument of private law are also unconstitutional, Autonomia Estatutária das Empresas Publicas e Descentralização Administrativa, Coimbra 2005.
Dom nr. 224/95 af 26. april 1995 og dom nr. 576/96 af 16. april 1996.
Judgment No 224/95 of 26 April 1995 and Judgment No 576/96 of 16 April 1996.
Portugals brev af 8. juni 2010.
Submission by Portugal of 8 June 2010.
Portugals brev af 17. juni 2011.
Submission by Portugal 17 June 2011.
Lovdekret nr. 91/A/77 trak RTP's vedtægter fra 1976 tilbage og fastlagde, at RTP skulle overgå til at blive forvaltet af en administrativ kommission.
Law No 91/A/77 annulled the 1976 Statutes of RTP and it provided that RTP would be governed by an Administrative Commission.
Domstolens dom af 22. november 2001 i sag C-53/00 Ferring SA mod Agence centrale des organismes de sécurité sociale (ACOSS), Sml. 2001 I, s. 9067.
See Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2001 in Case C-53/00 Ferring SA v Agence centrale des organismes de sécurité sociale (ACOSS) [2001] ECR I-9067.
Klausul 3 og 4 i den nye public service-aftale.
Clauses 3 and 4 of the new public service contract.
I henhold til klausul 14 i den tidligere og klausul 21, stk. 3, i den nye public service-aftale: »Deltagelse i nævnte investeringer sker fortrinsvis fra førstekontrahentens side i dennes egenskab af aktionær i form af kapitalforhøjelse.«
Clause 14 of the old public service contract and Clause 21(3) of the new public service contract stipulate that: ‘Participation in the abovementioned investments shall be covered preferably by the first contracting party and as shareholder in the form of an increase in capital.’.
Se punkt 108 i brevet af 7. september 2009 fra Portugal.
See paragraph 108 of the letter from Portugal of 7 September 2009.
Se fodnote 36 i denne afgørelse.
See footnote 36 of this Decision.
Punkt 10 i meddelelse fra Kommissionen om anvendelsen af statsstøttereglerne på foranstaltninger vedrørende direkte beskatning af virksomhederne (EFT C 384 af 10.12.1998, s. 3).
Point 10 of the Commission notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation (OJ C 384, 10.12.1998, p. 3).
Domstolens dom af 17. februar 1993 i forenede sager C-159/91 og C-160/91 Christian Poucet mod Assurances Générales de France og Caisse Mutuelle Régionale du Languedoc-Roussillon, Sml. 1993 I, s. 637.
Judgment by the Court of Justice of 17 February 1993 in Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Christian Poucet v Assurances Générales de France and Caisse Mutuelle Régionale du Languedoc-Roussillon [1993] ECR I-637.
Domstolens dom af 17. juni 1999 i sag C-295/97, Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio SpA mod International Factors Italia SpA (Ifitalia), Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH et Ministero della Difesa, Sml. 1999 I, s. 3735, præmis 35.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 June 1999 in Case C-295/97 Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio SpA v International Factors Italia SpA (Ifitalia), Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH and Ministero della Difesa [1999] ECR I-3735, paragraph 35.
Se præmis 64 i dommen i sag T-442/03.
See paragraph 64 of Judgment in Case T-442/03,
Se præmis 51 i dommen i sag T-442/03.
See paragraph 51 of Judgment in Case T-442/03.
Se punkt 214-221 i Portugals brev af 8. juni 2010.
See paragraphs 214 to 221 of the submission by Portugal of 8 June 2010.
Se præmis 75-77 i dommen i sag T-442/03.
See paragraphs 75 to 77 of Judgment in Case T-442/03.
Se også Domstolens dom af 8. november 2001 i sag C-14/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline GmbH og Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke GmbH mod Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten, Sml. 2001 I, s. 8365.
See also judgment of the Court of 8 November 2001 in C-14/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline GmbH and Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke GmbH v Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten [2001] ECR I-8365.
Lovdekret nr. 91-A/77 fastlagde, at RTP skulle forvaltes af en administrativ kommission på grund af den strukturelle krise.
Law No 91/A/77 stipulated that an Administrative Council should govern RTP on account of its structural crisis.
Se Domstolens dom i sag C-342/96, Kongeriget Spanien mod Kommissionen, Sml. 1999 I, s. 2459.
See Judgment of the Court in Case C-342/96, Kingdom of Spain v Commission [1999] ECR I-02459.
Kommissionens meddelelse til medlemsstaterne om anvendelse af EØF-traktatens artikel 92 og 93 og af artikel 5 i Kommissionens direktiv 80/723/EØF på offentlige virksomheder i fremstillingssektoren (EFT C 307 af 13.11.1993, s. 3).
Commission communication to the Member States — Application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EEC Treaty and of Article 5 of Commission Directive 80/723/EEC to public undertakings in the manufacturing sector (OJ C 307, 13.11.1993, p. 3).
Denne referencesats er baseret på den 5-årige interbankrente for swaps, forhøjet med en præmie (Se Kommissionens meddelelse om metoden for fastsættelse af referencesatsen og kalkulationsrenten, EFT C 273 af 9.9.1997, s. 3). Portugals referencesatser siden 1. januar 1997 findes på følgende internetadresse: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html.
The reference rate is based on the five-year interbank swap rate plus a premium (see Commission notice on the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3). The reference rates for Portugal since 1 January 1997 can be found at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html
Se Dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans af 8. oktober 2002 i forenede sager Métropole Télévision SA (M6) (T-185/00), Antena 3 de Televisión, SA (T-216/00), Gestevisión Telecinco, SA (T-299/00) og SIC — Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, SA (T-300/00) mod Kommissionen, Sml. 2002 II, s. 3805.
See judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2002 in joined Cases Métropole Télévision SA (M6) (T-185/00), Antena 3 de Televisión SA (T-216/00), Gestevisión Telecinco SA (T-299/00) and SIC — Sociedade Independente de Comunicação SA (T-300/00) v Commission [2002] ECR II-3805.
I henhold til Domstolens retspraksis må det antages, at samhandelen påvirkes af statsstøtten, når en finansiel støtte, som ydes af en stat, styrker en virksomheds position i forhold til andre virksomheder, som den konkurrerer med i samhandelen mellem medlemsstater.
In accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice, when State aid strengthens the position of an undertaking compared with other undertakings competing in intra-Union trade, the latter must be regarded as affected by that State aid.
Se Domstolens dom af 17. september 1980 i sag 730/79 Philip Morris Holland mod Kommissionen, Sml. 1980, s. 671, præmis 11; Domstolens dom af 21. marts 1991 i sag C-303/88 Republikken Italien mod Kommissionen, Sml. 1991 I, s. 1433, præmis 17; Domstolens dom af 19. september 2000 i sag C-156/98 Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland mod Kommissionen, Sml. 2000 I, s. 6857, præmis 33.
See Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 September 1980 in Cases 730/79 Philip Morris Holland v Commission [1980] ECR 671, paragraph 11; judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 March 1991 in Case C-303/88 Italian Republic v Commission [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 17; judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 September 2000 in Case C-156/98 Federal Republic of Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 33.
Domstolens dom af 24. juli 2003 i sag C-280/00, Altmark Trans og Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg mod Nahverkehrgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, Sml. 2003 I, s. 7747.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 July 2003 in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH et Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747.
Ibid., præmis 101-109.
Ibidem, paragraphs 101 to 109.
I disse præmisser undersøgte Domstolen spørgsmålet, om visse statslige betalinger til transportvirksomheder, og som udgjorde statsstøtte, kunne betragtes som forenelige med fællesmarkedet i henhold til traktatens artikel 77 (nu artikel 93 i TEUF) i deres egenskab af betaling for udførelsen af tjenesteydelser af offentlig interesse.
In those paragraphs the Court examined the question of whether some state payments to transport undertakings classified as State aid could be found to be compatible with the common market under Article 77 of the EC Treaty [now Article 93 TFEU] as reimbursement for the discharge of public service obligations.
Dette ræsonnement bør finde tilsvarende anvendelse på virksomheder, der har fået pålagt udførelsen af tjenesteydelser af almindelig økonomisk interesse, og med udgangspunkt i EF-traktatens artikel 86, stk. 2 (nu artikel 106, stk. 2, i TEUF).
This reasoning must apply mutatis mutandis to undertaking entrusted with an SGEI outside the transport sector and in relation to Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty [now 106 (2) TFEU].
Det er fortsat meddelelsen fra 2001, der finder anvendelse i denne sag af ratione temporis-årsager.
It is still the 2001 Communication which applies to this case for reasons of ratione temporis.
Se punkt 29 i meddelelsen om radio- og tv-virksomhed.
See paragraph 29 of the Broadcasting communication.
I Amsterdamprotokollen hedder det, at offentlig radio- og tv-virksomhed hænger direkte sammen med de demokratiske, sociale og kulturelle behov i de enkelte samfund og med nødvendigheden af at bevare mediepluralisme.
The Amsterdam Protocol considers that the system of public broadcasting is directly related to the democratic, social and cultural needs of each society and to the need to preserve media pluralism.
Se punkt 33 i meddelelsen om radio- og tv-virksomhed.
See paragraph 33 of the Broadcasting Communication.
Se præmis 81 i dom afsagt af Retten i Første Instans i sag T-442/03.
See paragraph 81 of the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-442/03.
Kommissionens udtalelse om, at omdannelsen ikke var nødvendig, blev ikke fremsat inden for rammerne af vurderingen af forenelighed i medfør af EF-traktatens artikel 86, stk. 2, nu artikel 106, stk. 2, i TEUF.
The Commission’s statement that the transformation was not necessary was not made in the context of the compatibility assessment under Article 86(2) EC Treaty, now Article 106(2) TFEU.
Se præmis 139 i Rettens dom i forenede sager T-568/08 og T-573/08, Métropole télévision (M6) og Télévision française 1 SA (TFI), endnu ikke offentliggjort i Rettens samling af afgørelser.
See paragraph 139 of the Judgment of the General Court in Joined Case T-568/08 and T-573/08, Métropole télévision (M6) and Télévision française 1 SA (TFI), not yet published in the Court reports.
Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØF af 3. oktober 1989 om samordning af visse love og administrative bestemmelser i medlemsstaterne vedrørende udøvelse af tv-radiospredningsvirksomhed (EFT L 298 af 17.10.1989, s. 23).
Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ L 298, 17.10.1989, p. 23).
Det hedder i direktivets artikel 5, at »medlemsstaterne skal (…) drage omsorg for, at tv-radiospredningsorganerne afsætter mindst 10 % af sendetiden (…) eller alternativt (…) mindst 10 % af deres programbudget til europæiske programmer, der er fremstillet af producenter, som er uafhængige af disse organer«. I betragtning 45 i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 97/36/EF af 30. juni 1997 om ændring af Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØF om samordning af visse love og administrative bestemmelser i medlemsstaterne vedrørende udøvelse af tv-spredningsvirksomhed hedder det endvidere, at »målsætningen om at støtte den europæiske programindustri kan opfyldes i medlemsstaterne (…) ved at de pålægger visse tv-spredningsorganisationer en pligt til at varetage offentlige interesser, herunder pligt til i væsentligt omfang at investere i europæiske produktioner« ( EFT L 202 af 30.7.1997, s. 60), ophævet ved Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2010/13/EU af 10. marts 2010 om samordning af visse love og administrative bestemmelser i medlemsstaterne om udbud af audiovisuelle medietjenester (direktiv om audiovisuelle medietjenester) (EUT L 95 af 15.4.2010, s. 1).
According to Article 5, ‘Member States shall ensure […] that broadcasters reserve at least 10 % of their transmission time […], or alternately, […], at least 10 % of their programming budget, for European works created by producers who are independent of broadcasters. Furthermore, according to recital 45 to Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, the objective of supporting audiovisual production in Europe can be pursued within the Member State through the definition of a public interest mission for certain broadcasting organisations, […] including the obligation to contribute substantially to investment in European production’ ( OJ L 202, 30.7.1997, p. 60), repealed by Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p. 1).
Klausul 13 i den tidligere public service-aftale og klausul 7, stk. 1, litra a), i den nye public service-aftale.
Clause 13 of the old public service contract and Clause 7(1)(a) of the new public service contract.
Brev fra Portugal af 30. juni 1999.
Letter from Portugal of 30 June 1999.
Meddelelsen om radio- og tv-virksomhed, punkt 40.
Broadcasting Communication, paragraph 40.
Der forelå ingen public service-rapport for 1992, men det var heller ikke noget juridisk krav, da det kun var den tidligere public service-aftale, der indeholdt dette krav.
For 1992, a public service report was not available, but also not legally required, as it was only the old public service contract which stipulated that requirement.
For 1992 kom revisorerne imidlertid til den konklusion, at der ikke forelå nogen overtrædelse af den på daværende tidspunkt gældende lovgivning.
However, also for the year 1992 the auditors come to the conclusion that there was no infringement of the legislation valid at the time.
De finder heller ikke noget tilfælde af overkompensation.
Neither do they find any overcompensation.
Sammenfattende rapport vedrørende de eksterne revisioner, punkt 1.4 b.
Synthesis report of the external audits, point 1.4(b).
Oversættelsen afspejler den portugisiske original, der taler om »koncessionsaftaler«.
The translation reflects the Portuguese original, which speaks of ‘concession contracts’.
Koncessionsaftalerne er identiske med public service-aftalerne, dvs. den tidligere og den nye public service-aftale, som omtalt i hele afgørelsen, se også fodnote 26 i denne afgørelse.
The concession contracts are identical with the public service contracts, i.e. the old and the new public service contract as referred to throughout the decision, see also footnote 26 of this Decision.
For 1994 blev der fundet en værdi på 14034734000 PTE, som ansås at overstige det beløb, som regeringen havde tildelt, men i henhold til klausul 15.4 kunne der ikke kræves yderligere kompensation end de 7145 mio. PTE som vist i tabel 1 i denne afgørelse.
For 1994, a value of PTE 14034734000 was found which was found to exceed the amount allocated by the Government, but according to clause 15.4 no further compensation could be claimed than the PTE 7145 million granted, as shown in Table 1 of this Decision.
For 1996 blev der fundet et beløb af 14594568000 PTE, der lå over det tildelte beløb på 14500 mio. PTE.
For 1996, an amount of PTE 14594568000 was found, which was above the amount allocated of PTE 14500 million.
For 1997 fandtes en værdi af 11752261000 PTE, sammenholdt med 10350 mio. PTE for den faktiske tildeling.
For the year 1997 a value of 11752261000 was found which compares to PTE 10350 million of actual allocation.
Side 23 i den sammenfattende rapport for alle revisionerne.
Page 23 of the synthesis report on all the audits.
Portugals brev af 25. august 2011.
Submission from Portugal of 25 August 2011.
Se ligeledes betragtning 27 og 116 i Kommissionens beslutning i sag NN 31/06.
See also recitals 27 and 116 of the Commission Decision in Case NN 31/06.
Det skal bemærkes, at ifølge Portugal er omfanget af denne kritik meget mindre, idet kun 4 mio. EUR af de 53 mio. EUR var tabt.
It should be noted that according to Portugal, the dimension of this criticism is much smaller as of the amount of EUR 53 million, only 4 million were lost.
Se præmis 194 ff. og navnlig præmis 201 og 203 i dommen i sag T-442/03.
See paragraphs 194 et seq. and in particular paragraphs 201 and 203 of the Judgment in Case T-442/03.
Meddelelsen om radio- og tv-virksomhed, punkt 57 og 58.
Broadcasting Communication, paragraphs 57 and 58.
De driftsudgifter for kanal 1 og 2, som i overensstemmelse med den tidligere public service-aftale svarede til finansieringsudgifter og til korrespondentudgifter, som ligeledes påløber andre operatører.
The operating costs of the first and second channel under the old public service contract correspond to the financing costs and the costs of correspondence where other operators were also set up.
For 1992 vil registreringsgebyrerne på 11000000 PTE skulle tages i betragtning, se betragtning 210 i denne afgørelse nedenfor.
For 1992, the registration charges of PTE 11000000 will have to be taken into account, see recital 210 of this Decision below.
Meddelelsen om radio- og tv-virksomhed, punkt 58.
Broadcasting Communication, paragraph 58.
Punkt 91 i åbningsskrivelsen.
Recital 91 of the decision initiating the procedure in this case.