natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ifølge de amerikanske embedsmænd og offentligt tilgængelige data [7] vil produktionen af denne type bioethanol nå op på ca. 4 mia. liter i 2014 og over 50 mia. liter inden 2021.
According to US officials and publicly available data [7], the production of this type of bioethanol will reach around 4 billion litres in 2014 and more than 50 billion litres by 2021.
En forhandler/blandingsproducent hævdede, at virksomheden ikke havde modtaget støtte ved salg på hjemmemarkedet.
One trader/blender claimed that it had not received a subsidy for its domestic sales.
Virksomheden har dog ikke fremlagt dokumentation for denne påstand;
However, it fails to provide proof for this claim;
Men det bør for det første tages i betragtning, at de ønskede oplysninger indeholder forretningshemmeligheder og derfor ikke kan videregives til andre end den berørte part.
However, it should be considered on the one hand that the information requested contains business secret information and cannot therefore be disclosed to other parties than the party concerned.
For det andet er det almindelig praksis i institutionerne at oplyse om den generelle metode, som anvendes til at fastlægge dumping for alle parter, hvor individuelle oplysninger ikke indgår i beregningerne.
On the other, it is constant practice of the institutions to disclose the general method used to establish dumping to all parties for which no individual data was used in the calculations.
Den mængde bioethanol, der anvendes som brændstof i Unionen, udgjorde 54 % i 2008, 66 % i 2009 og 68 % i 2010.
The percentage of bioethanol used for fuel in the Union was 54 % in 2008, 66 % in 2009, and 68 % in 2010.
For så vidt angår UP blev procentsatsen for 2010 anvendt til at anslå den relevante import i UP.
For the IP, the percentage of 2010 was used for the purpose of estimating the relevant imports made during the IP.
Det medførte en positiv udvikling, navnlig for så vidt angår skadesfaktorerne, især i perioden indtil 2010.
This led to positive developments in particular for the above injury factors especially in the period up to 2010.
Men situationen på EU-markedet ændrede sig i takt med den kraftige stigning i dumpingimporten fra USA i 2010, og den forventede vækst i aktiviteten i UP fandt ikke sted.
But the situation in the Union market changed in coincidence with the surge of US dumped imports in 2010 and the growth in activity expected during the IP did not materialise.
Likviditeten var negativ i 2008, men forbedredes i 2009 og 2010.
Cash flow was negative in 2008 and improved in 2009 and 2010.
I UP begyndte likviditeten dog at falde igen og afspejlede dermed en forringelse af EU-erhvervsgrenens evne til selv at finansiere sine aktiviteter.
During the IP, however, cash flow started to decrease again, reflecting a worsening in the Union industry’s ability to self-finance its activities.
Det bør dog påpeges, at det fremgik af undersøgelsen, at ethvert påstået lavt niveau med hensyn til EU-produktionen hovedsageligt var berettiget på grund af et lavt niveau for salgspriserne på EU-markedet, der generelt var påvirket af den kraftige stigning i lavprisimporten fra USA, som underbød EU-producenternes priser, især i UP.
Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that the investigation showed that any alleged low level of the Union production was mainly justified by a low level of sales prices in the Union market which was largely affected by the surge of low-priced US dumped imports undercutting the Union producers’ prices, in particular during the IP.
Tilsyneladende havde EU-producenterne ikke andet valg end at stoppe produktionen, da priserne ikke engang kunne dække omkostningerne til råmaterialer især i UP.
It appeared that EU producers had no other choice than stopping production as prices did not even allow them to cover the cost of the raw material in particular during the IP.
Se US Internal Revenue Code (IRC) — sec.
See US Internal Revenue Code (IRC) — sec.
F.eks. a) oplysninger offentliggjort af American Coalition for Ethanol (ACE) på internettet, b) Energy Policy Act (EPA) fra 2005, især P.L.
For instance: (a) the information published by the American Coalition for Ethanol (ACE) on the web; (b) the Energy Policy Act (EPA) of 2005, in particular P.L.
110-58, c) Energy Independence and Security Act fra 2007 (P.L. 110-140, H.R.6) om ændring og udvidelse af Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS), som kræver et forbrug på 9 mia. gallons fornyelige brændstoffer i 2008 og 13,9 mia. gallons i 2011, d) faktablade udstedt af US Department of Energy i henhold til Clean cities actions, osv.
109-58; (c) the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (P.L. 110-140, H.R.6) which amended and increased the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) requiring 9 billion gallons of renewable fuels use in 2008 and 13,9 billion gallons in 2011; (d) fact sheets issued by the US Department of Energy under the Clean cities actions etc.
Rådets gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 158/2013
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 158/2013
om genindførelse af en endelig antidumpingtold på importen af visse typer tilberedte eller konserverede citrusfrugter (mandariner osv.) med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina
reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China
Europa-Kommissionen (»Kommissionen«) offentliggjorde den 20. oktober 2007 en meddelelse i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende om indledning af en antidumpingprocedure vedrørende importen til Fællesskabet af visse typer tilberedte eller konserverede citrusfrugter (mandariner osv.) med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina (»Kina«) [2].
On 20 October 2007 the European Commission (‘the Commission’) announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Community of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’) [2].
Den 4. juli 2008 indførte Kommissionen ved forordning (EF) nr. 642/2008 [3] (»forordningen om midlertidig told«) en midlertidig antidumpingtold på importen af visse typer tilberedte eller konserverede citrusfrugter med oprindelse i Kina.
On 4 July 2008, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 642/2008 [3] (‘the provisional Regulation’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in the PRC.
Proceduren blev indledt som følge af en klage indgivet den 6. september 2007 af den spanske nationale føderation af sammenslutninger for forarbejdningsindustrien for frugt- og grøntsager (»FENAVAL« tidligere kaldet »FNACV«) (»klageren«) på vegne af producenter, der udgør 100 % af EU-produktionen af visse typer tilberedte eller konserverede citrusfrugter (mandariner osv.).
The proceeding was initiated as a result of a complaint lodged on 6 September 2007 by the Spanish National Federation of Associations of Processed Fruit and Vegetables (‘FENAVAL’, previously named ‘FNACV’) (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing 100 % of the total Community production of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins etc.).
Som anført i betragtning 12 i forordningen om midlertidig told omfattede undersøgelsen af dumping og skade perioden fra 1. oktober 2006 til 30. september 2007 (»undersøgelsesperioden« eller »UP«).
As set out in recital 12 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Undersøgelsen af udviklingstendenser af relevans for vurderingen af skade omfattede perioden fra den 1. oktober 2002 til udgangen af undersøgelsesperioden (»den betragtede periode«).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 October 2002 to the end of the investigation period (‘period considered’).
Den 9. november 2007 gjorde Kommissionen gennem forordning (EF) nr. 1295/2007 af 5. november 2007 om indførelse af registrering af importen af visse tilberedte eller konserverede citrusfrugter (mandariner osv.) med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina [4] (»registreringsforordningen«) importen af samme vare med oprindelse i Kina til genstand for registrering.
On 9 November 2007, the Commission made imports of the same product originating in the PRC subject to registration by Regulation (EC) No 1295/2007 of 5 November 2007 making imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China subject to registration [4] (‘Registration Regulation’).
De endelige beskyttelsesforanstaltninger blev vedtaget ved forordning (EF) nr. 658/2004 [6] (»forordningen om beskyttelsesforanstaltninger«).
Definitive safeguard measures followed by Regulation (EC) No 658/2004 [6] (‘the safeguard Regulation’).
Ved forordning (EF) nr. 1355/2008 [7] (»den oprindelige forordning«) indførte Rådet en endelig antidumpingtold på importen af visse typer tilberedte eller konserverede citrusfrugter (mandariner osv.) med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina.
By Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 [7] (‘the original Regulation’) the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Den endelige antidumpingtold var på mellem 361,4 og 531,2 EUR pr. ton af varens nettovægt.
The range of the definitive anti-dumping duty was between 361,4 and 531,2 EUR/tonne net product weight.
Xinshiji-dommen
Xinshiji judgment
Retten annullerede ved dommen af 17. februar 2011 i sag T-122/09 — Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd. og Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd. mod Rådet for Den Europæiske Union med støtte af Europa-Kommissionen [8] — (»Xinshiji-dommen«) den oprindelige forordning, for så vidt angår ansøgerne Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co., Ltd. og Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd.
By judgment of 17 February 2011 in Case T-122/09 — Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd and Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union supported by European Commission [8] — (‘the Xinshiji judgment’) the General Court annulled the original Regulation in so far as it concerns the applicants Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co., Ltd and Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd
Rettens dom var baseret på, at Kommissionen overtrådte retten til forsvar ved ikke at give de oplysninger, der i lyset af markedets struktur var nødvendige for at fastsætte, om justeringen af eksportprisen til importørens niveau ab fabrik var passende, således at det var muligt at sammenligne eksportprisen og EU-erhvervsgrenens pris i samme handelsled.
The General Court’s judgment was based on the grounds that the Commission breached the rights of defence by not providing the information necessary for the applicants to determine whether, in the light of the structure of the market, the adjustment of export price to the ex-works level of the importer was appropriate in that it made it possible to compare the export price and the Union industry price at the same level of trade.
Retten var også af den opfattelse, at Kommissionen overtrådte forpligtelsen til at anføre begrundelsen, da begrundelserne for en foranstaltning skal være indeholdt i selve foranstaltningen og ikke må angives i skriftlige eller mundtlige forklaringer, der afgives efterfølgende, når foranstaltningen allerede er genstand for søgsmål ved Den Europæiske Unions Domstol.
The General Court also considered that the Commission infringed the duty to state reasons as the reasons for a measure must appear in the actual body of the measure and may not be stated in written or oral explanations given subsequently when the measure is already the subject of proceeding brought before the European Union Courts.
I april 2011 appellerede Kommissionen sagen (C-195/11P) og søgte at få Xinshiji-dommen omstødt.
In April 2011 the Commission lodged an appeal (C-195/11 P) seeking to set aside the Xinshiji judgment.
Efter at Den Europæiske Unions Domstol (»Domstolen«) den 22. marts 2012 erklærede den oprindelige forordning for ugyldig (jf. betragtning 16), trak Kommissionen sin appelsag tilbage, da den var overflødig.
Following the declaration of invalidity of the original Regulation by the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Court’) on 22 March 2012 (see recital 16 below), the Commission withdrew its appeal as it became without object.
Den 3. december 2011 offentliggjorde Kommissionen en meddelelse [9] om en delvis genoptagelse af antidumpingundersøgelsen (»meddelelse om den første genoptagelse«) med henblik på at gennemføre Rettens Xinshiji-dom.
On 3 December 2011 the Commission published a notice [9] partially reopening the anti-dumping investigation (‘the first reopening Notice’) in order to implement the General Court’s Xinshiji judgment.
Genoptagelsen var begrænset til at fastslå, om justeringen af eksportprisen til importørens niveau ab fabrik var passende i lyset af markedets struktur, således at det var muligt at sammenligne eksportprisen og EU-erhvervsgrenens pris i samme handelsled.
The reopening was limited to determine whether, in the light of the structure of the market, the adjustment of export price to the ex-work level of the importer was appropriate in that it made it possible to compare the export price and the Union industry price at the same level of trade.
På samme måde modtog alle interesserede parter et oplysningsdokument, hvis bilag indeholdt forklaringer på justeringen af omkostningerne efter importen, som var blevet taget i betragtning ved beregningen af prisen på varer med oprindelse i Kina.
Simultaneously, all interested parties received a disclosure document with its enclosures explaining the reasons behind the adjustment of the post-importation costs which had been taken into account in calculating the price of products originating in the PRC.
Alle parter, som anmodede herom inden for ovennævnte frist, og som påviste, at der var særlige grunde til, at de burde høres, fik lejlighed til at blive hørt.
All parties which so requested within the above time limit and which demonstrated that there were particular reasons why they should be heard were granted the opportunity to be heard.
De to ansøgende eksportører, otte importører, to sammenslutninger af importører og en sammenslutning af producenter gav sig tilkende som interesserede parter.
The two applicant exporters, eight importers, two associations of importers and one association of producers came forward as interested parties.
Referencelandsdom
Analogue country judgment
Den 22. marts 2012 erklærede Domstolen i sag C-338/10, Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) mod Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (»referencelandsdom«), den oprindelige forordning for ugyldig [10].
On 22 March 2012, in Case C-338/10 — Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (‘the analogue country judgment’) — the Court declared the original Regulation invalid [10].
Domstolen var af den opfattelse, at eftersom Kommissionen og Rådet havde fastlagt den normale værdi for den pågældende vare på grundlag af de priser, der faktisk er betalt eller skal betales i Den Europæiske Union for samme vare uden at have udvist den nødvendige omhu for at fastsætte denne værdi på grundlag af priser, der betales for samme vare i et tredjeland med markedsøkonomi, havde de overtrådt kravene i grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra a).
The Court held that since the Commission and the Council had determined the normal value of the product concerned on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable in the European Union for a like product, without taking all due care to determine that value on the basis of the prices paid for that same product in a market economy third country, they had infringed the requirements of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Ved meddelelsen blev den relevante antidumpingundersøgelse også delvis genoptaget for så vidt angår importen af visse typer tilberedte eller konserverede citrusfrugter (mandariner osv.) med oprindelse i Kina for at gennemføre ovennævnte dom afsagt af Domstolen.
The notice also partially reopened the relevant anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the PRC in order to implement the above judgment of the Court.
I meddelelsen anføres det, at genoptagelsen var begrænset til udvælgelsen af et eventuelt referenceland og til fastsættelsen af den normale værdi, der skal anvendes ved beregningen af en eventuel dumpingmargin, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra a).
The notice set out that the reopening was limited in scope to the selection of an analogue country, if any, and the determination of the normal value pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation to be used for the calculation of any margin of dumping.
Alle interesserede parter opfordredes desuden ved samme meddelelse til at tilkendegive deres synspunkter, indsende oplysninger og forelægge dokumentation for, om der findes tredjelande med markedsøkonomi, som kan vælges med henblik på at fastsætte den normale værdi, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra a), herunder også Israel, Swaziland, Thailand og Tyrkiet.
Moreover, by the same notice, interested parties were invited to make their views known, submit information and provide supporting evidence regarding the availability of market economy third countries which could be selected to determine normal value pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, including with regard to Israel, Swaziland, Thailand and Turkey.
Kommissionen underrettede direkte EU-erhvervsgrenen og dennes sammenslutning, de eksporterende producenter, leverandører og importører og deres sammenslutninger, som man vidste var berørt, og myndighederne i de berørte tredjelande.
The Commission directly informed the Union industry and their association, the exporting producers, suppliers and importers and their associations known to be concerned, and the authorities of the third countries concerned.
Otte importører og en sammenslutning af importører gav sig tilkende som interesserede parter.
Eight importers and one association of importers came forward as interested parties.
PROCEDURE EFTER FREMLÆGGELSE AF MIDLERTIDIGE FORANSTALTNINGER
PROCEDURE AFTER DISCLOSURE OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES
Efter indførelsen af en midlertidig antidumpingtold på importen af den pågældende vare med oprindelse i Kina indsendte en række interesserede parter skriftlige bemærkninger.
Following the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC, several interested parties submitted comments in writing.
Parter, der anmodede herom, fik også lejlighed til at blive hørt.
The parties who so requested were also granted the opportunity to be heard.
Kommissionen fuldendte navnlig sin undersøgelse vedrørende Unionens interesser.
In particular, the Commission completed the investigation with regard to Union (‘Community’) interest aspects.
Der blev i den forbindelse aflagt kontrolbesøg hos følgende ikke forretningsmæssigt forbundne importører i Unionen:
In this respect, verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following unrelated importers in the Union:
Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International (GmbH & Co KG), Hamborg, Tyskland
Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International (GmbH & Co KG), Hamburg, Germany,
Hüpeden & Co (GmbH & Co) KG, Hamborg, Tyskland
Hüpeden & Co (GmbH & Co) KG, Hamburg, Germany,
(GmbH & Co), Hamborg, Tyskland
(GmbH & Co), Hamburg, Germany,
Gaston spol. s r.o., Zlin, Tjekkiet.
Gaston spol. s r.o., Zlín, Czech Republic.
De fik også en frist, inden for hvilken de kunne fremsætte bemærkninger til fremlæggelsen af disse oplysninger.
They were also granted a period of time within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Efter indførelsen af de midlertidige foranstaltninger fremførte to ikke forretningsmæssigt forbundne EU-importører, at visse typer mandariner burde udelukkes fra definitionen af den pågældende vare enten på grund af deres sødmeniveau eller deres emballering i forbindelse med eksport.
Subsequent to the imposition of provisional measures, two unrelated Union importers argued that certain types of mandarins should be excluded from the definition of the product concerned either because of their sweetness level or because of their packing when exported.
Det skal bemærkes, at disse påstande ikke var ledsaget af verificerbare oplysninger og data, der kunne dokumentere, at disse typer mandariner har egenskaber, der adskiller dem fra den pågældende vare.
In this respect, it is noted that these claims were not accompanied with any type of verifiable information and data proving that these types have characteristics that differentiate them from the product concerned.
Det bemærkes også, at forskelle i emballering ikke kan betragtes som et kritisk element, når den pågældende vare defineres, især da emballeringsformatet allerede er taget i betragtning ved definitionen af den pågældende vare, jf. betragtning 16 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
It is also noted that differences in packing cannot be considered as a critical element when defining product concerned, especially when formats of packing were already taken into account when defining the product concerned as set out in recital 16 of the provisional Regulation.
Foranstaltningerne blev indført på den vare, der er defineret i den oprindelige forordning, som følger:
The measures were imposed on the product defined in the original Regulation as follows:
tilberedte eller konserverede mandariner (herunder tangeriner og satsumas), klementiner, wilkings og andre lignende krydsninger af citrusfrugter, ikke tilsat alkohol, også tilsat sukker eller andre sødemidler, og som defineret i KN-position 2008, i øjeblikket henhørende under KN-kode 20083055, 20083075 og ex20083090 (Taric-kode 2008309061, 2008309063, 2008309065, 2008309067 og 2008309069), med oprindelse i Kina.
prepared or preserved mandarins (including tangerines and satsumas), clementines, wilkings and other similar citrus hybrids, not containing added spirit, whether or not containing added sugar or other sweetening matter, and as defined under CN heading 2008, currently falling within CN codes 20083055, 20083075 and ex20083090 (TARIC codes 2008309061, 2008309063, 2008309065, 2008309067 and 2008309069) and originating in the PRC.
I den forbindelse fortolkede Domstolen i sin referencelandsdom de statistikker, som Kommissionen meddelte Domstolen den 27. juli 2011, som data, der kun vedrører den pågældende vare.
In this regard, in the analogue country judgement the Court interpreted the statistics communicated by the Commission to the Court on 27 July 2011 as data relative solely to the product concerned.
Kommissionen har imidlertid undersøgt den fulde rækkevidde af hver KN-kode indholdt i disse statistikker og det bør bemærkes, at de har et bredere anvendelsesområde end den vare, der er underlagt foranstaltninger, da de omfatter de fulde KN-koder 20083055, 20083075 og 20083090.
However, the Commission has re-examined the full extent of each CN code included in those statistics and it should be noted that they have a broader scope than the product under measures, since they included full CN codes 20083055, 20083075 and 20083090.
De statistiske oplysninger, der kun omfattende den pågældende vare eller samme vare (KN-kode 20083055 og 20083075), er for ovennævnte lande i undersøgelsesperioden følgende:
The statistical data only covering the product concerned or like product for CN codes 20083055 and 20083075, for the abovementioned countries during the investigation period are as follows:
Derfor kan det ikke afledes af statistikkerne, at samme vare blev importeret i betydelige mængder i undersøgelsesperioden fra Israel eller Swaziland
Therefore, it cannot be derived from the statistics that the like product was imported during the investigation period in significant quantities from either Israel or Swaziland.