natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Denne forordning bør give alle notarer, der har adgang til at behandle arvesager i medlemsstaterne, mulighed for at udøve en sådan adgang.
This Regulation should allow all notaries who have competence in matters of succession in the Member States to exercise such competence.
Hvorvidt notarerne i en given medlemsstat er bundet af kompetencereglerne i denne forordning bør afhænge af, om de falder ind under definitionen af »ret« i denne forordning.
Whether or not the notaries in a given Member State are bound by the rules of jurisdiction set out in this Regulation should depend on whether or not they are covered by the term ‘court’ for the purposes of this Regulation.
Akter udstedt af notarer i arvesager i medlemsstaterne bør udbredes i henhold til denne forordning.
Acts issued by notaries in matters of succession in the Member States should circulate under this Regulation.
Når notarer udøver en retslig funktion, er de bundet af kompetencereglerne, og de afgørelser, som de udsteder, bør udbredes efter bestemmelserne om anerkendelse, eksigibilitet og fuldbyrdelse af retsafgørelser.
When notaries exercise judicial functions they are bound by the rules of jurisdiction, and the decisions they give should circulate in accordance with the provisions on recognition, enforceability and enforcement of decisions.
Når notarer ikke udøver en retslig funktion, er de ikke bundet af kompetencereglerne, og de officielt bekræftede dokumenter, som de udsteder, bør udbredes efter bestemmelserne om officielt bekræftede dokumenter.
When notaries do not exercise judicial functions they are not bound by the rules of jurisdiction, and the authentic instruments they issue should circulate in accordance with the provisions on authentic instruments.
I betragtning af de europæiske borgeres stigende mobilitet og for at sikre korrekt retspleje i Unionen og sikre en reel tilknytning mellem arven og den medlemsstat, hvori kompetencen udøves, bør denne forordning bestemme, at det generelle tilknytningskriterium for fastlæggelsen af såvel kompetence som lovvalg bør være afdødes sædvanlige opholdssted på dødstidspunktet.
In view of the increasing mobility of citizens and in order to ensure the proper administration of justice within the Union and to ensure that a genuine connecting factor exists between the succession and the Member State in which jurisdiction is exercised, this Regulation should provide that the general connecting factor for the purposes of determining both jurisdiction and the applicable law should be the habitual residence of the deceased at the time of death.
For at fastlægge det sædvanlige opholdssted bør den myndighed, der behandler arvesagen, foretage en samlet vurdering af afdødes livsomstændigheder i årene forud for dødsfaldet og på dødstidspunktet under hensyn til alle relevante, faktiske forhold, især varigheden og lovligheden af afdødes tilstedeværelse i den pågældende stat samt vilkårene og baggrunden for denne tilstedeværelse.
In order to determine the habitual residence, the authority dealing with the succession should make an overall assessment of the circumstances of the life of the deceased during the years preceding his death and at the time of his death, taking account of all relevant factual elements, in particular the duration and regularity of the deceased’s presence in the State concerned and the conditions and reasons for that presence.
I visse tilfælde kan det vise sig at være komplekst at fastlægge afdødes sædvanlige opholdssted.
In certain cases, determining the deceased’s habitual residence may prove complex.
Hvis afdøde var statsborger i et af disse lande eller havde alle sine vigtigste ejendele i et af disse lande, kunne den pågældendes nationalitet eller disse ejendeles placering være en særlig faktor i forbindelse med den samlede vurdering af alle de faktiske omstændigheder.
If the deceased was a national of one of those States or had all his main assets in one of those States, his nationality or the location of those assets could be a special factor in the overall assessment of all the factual circumstances.
Med hensyn til fastlæggelse af den lov, der finder anvendelse på arven, kan den myndighed, som behandler arven, i undtagelsestilfælde — når den afdøde f.eks. var flyttet til den stat, hvor vedkommende havde sit sædvanlige opholdssted, temmelig kort tid inden sin død, og alle sagens omstændigheder viser, at han var klart tættere tilknyttet en anden stat — konkludere, at den lov, som skal finde anvendelse på sagen, ikke bør være loven i den stat, hvor den afdøde havde sit sædvanlige opholdssted, men derimod loven i den stat, som den afdøde havde en klart tættere tilknytning til.
With regard to the determination of the law applicable to the succession the authority dealing with the succession may in exceptional cases – where, for instance, the deceased had moved to the State of his habitual residence fairly recently before his death and all the circumstances of the case indicate that he was manifestly more closely connected with another State – arrive at the conclusion that the law applicable to the succession should not be the law of the State of the habitual residence of the deceased but rather the law of the State with which the deceased was manifestly more closely connected.
Intet i denne forordning bør forhindre en ret i at anvende mekanismer, der har til formål at bekæmpe omgåelse af loven som f.eks. fraude à la loi inden for international privatret.
Nothing in this Regulation should prevent a court from applying mechanisms designed to tackle the evasion of the law, such as fraude à la loi in the context of private international law.
Denne forordning fastlægger derfor en række mekanismer, der finder anvendelse, når den afdøde har valgt, at det er loven i en medlemsstat, hvor den pågældende var statsborger, der skal anvendes på arven efter vedkommende.
This Regulation therefore provides for a series of mechanisms which would come into play where the deceased had chosen as the law to govern his succession the law of a Member State of which he was a national.
En af disse mekanismer bør gøre det muligt for de berørte parter at indgå en værnetingsaftale til fordel for retterne i den medlemsstat, hvis lov er valgt.
One such mechanism should be to allow the parties concerned to conclude a choice-of-court agreement in favour of the courts of the Member State of the chosen law.
Det bør afgøres i det enkelte tilfælde, alt efter især det spørgsmål, der er omfattet af værnetingsaftalen, om aftalen skal indgås mellem alle de parter, der berørt af arvesagen, eller om nogle af dem kan aftale at indbringe et specifikt spørgsmål for den valgte ret i en situation, hvor denne rets afgørelse om spørgsmålet ikke vil berøre de øvrige parters arverettigheder.
It would have to be determined on a case-by-case basis, depending in particular on the issue covered by the choice-of-court agreement, whether the agreement would have to be concluded between all parties concerned by the succession or whether some of them could agree to bring a specific issue before the chosen court in a situation where the decision by that court on that issue would not affect the rights of the other parties to the succession.
Hvis en ret af egen drift indleder en arvesag, hvilket er tilfældet i visse medlemsstater, bør den pågældende ret afslutte behandlingen, hvis parterne er enige om at afgøre arvesagen udenretsligt ved forlig i den medlemsstat, hvis lov er valgt.
If succession proceedings are opened by a court of its own motion, as is the case in certain Member States, that court should close the proceedings if the parties agree to settle the succession amicably out of court in the Member State of the chosen law.
Hvis en ret ikke af egen drift indleder arvesagen, bør denne forordning ikke hindre parterne i at afgøre arvesagen udenretsligt ved forlig f.eks. for en notar i en medlemsstat efter eget valg, såfremt dette er muligt i henhold til denne medlemsstats lov.
Where succession proceedings are not opened by a court of its own motion, this Regulation should not prevent the parties from settling the succession amicably out of court, for instance before a notary, in a Member State of their choice where this is possible under the law of that Member State.
For at sikre, at retterne i alle medlemsstater kan udøve kompetence på samme grundlag for så vidt angår arven efter personer, der på dødstidspunktet ikke havde deres sædvanlige opholdssted i en medlemsstat, bør denne forordning på udtømmende vis i hierarkisk rækkefølge angive, på hvilke grundlag en sådan subsidiær kompetence kan udøves.
In order to ensure that the courts of all Member States may, on the same grounds, exercise jurisdiction in relation to the succession of persons not habitually resident in a Member State at the time of death, this Regulation should list exhaustively, in a hierarchical order, the grounds on which such subsidiary jurisdiction may be exercised.
Navnlig med henblik på at afhjælpe situationer, hvor der ikke er adgang til domstolsprøvelse, bør der i denne forordning åbnes mulighed for forum necessitatis, således at retten i en medlemsstat i undtagelsestilfælde kan træffe afgørelse i en arvesag, der er nært knyttet til et tredjeland.
In order to remedy, in particular, situations of denial of justice, this Regulation should provide a forum necessitatis allowing a court of a Member State, on an exceptional basis, to rule on a succession which is closely connected with a third State.
Af hensyn til arvinger og legatarer, der har deres sædvanlige opholdssted i en anden medlemsstat end den, hvor arvesagen behandles eller vil blive behandlet, bør denne forordning gøre det muligt for personer, der i henhold til den lov, der finder anvendelse på arven har ret til at fremsætte erklæringer om, hvorvidt de vedgår eller giver afkald på arven, legatet eller tvangsarven, eller erklæringer om begrænsning af deres hæftelse for gælden i boet, at fremsætte sådanne erklæringer i den form, som er fastsat i loven i den medlemsstat, hvor de har deres sædvanlige opholdssted, over for retterne i den pågældende medlemsstat.
In order to simplify the lives of heirs and legatees habitually resident in a Member State other than that in which the succession is being or will be dealt with, this Regulation should allow any person entitled under the law applicable to the succession to make declarations concerning the acceptance or waiver of the succession, of a legacy or of a reserved share, or concerning the limitation of his liability for the debts under the succession, to make such declarations in the form provided for by the law of the Member State of his habitual residence before the courts of that Member State.
De, der vælger at benytte sig af denne mulighed for at fremsætte erklæringer i den medlemsstat, hvor de har deres sædvanlige opholdssted, bør selv underrette den ret eller myndighed, der behandler eller vil behandle arvesagen, om, at der findes sådanne erklæringer, inden for den frist, der er fastsat i den lov, der finder anvendelse på arven.
Persons choosing to avail themselves of the possibility to make declarations in the Member State of their habitual residence should themselves inform the court or authority which is or will be dealing with the succession of the existence of such declarations within any time limit set by the law applicable to the succession.
Det bør ikke være muligt for en person, der ønsker at begrænse sin hæftelse for gælden i boet, at gøre dette blot med en erklæring herom over for retterne eller andre kompetente myndigheder i den medlemsstat, hvor han har sit sædvanlige opholdssted, såfremt den lov, der finder anvendelse på arven, kræver, at han anlægger en specifik sag, f.eks. en opgørelse af boet, ved den kompetente ret.
It should not be possible for a person who wishes to limit his liability for the debts under the succession to do so by a mere declaration to that effect before the courts or other competent authorities of the Member State of his habitual residence where the law applicable to the succession requires him to initiate specific legal proceedings, for instance inventory proceedings, before the competent court.
Af hensyn til en harmonisk retspleje bør det undgås, at der træffes uforenelige retsafgørelser i forskellige medlemsstater.
In the interests of the harmonious functioning of justice, the giving of irreconcilable decisions in different Member States should be avoided.
Med dette for øje bør denne forordning fastlægge almindelige retsplejeregler, der svarer til dem, der findes i andre EU-instrumenter vedrørende samarbejde på det civilretlige område.
To that end, this Regulation should provide for general procedural rules similar to those of other Union instruments in the area of judicial cooperation in civil matters.
Eftersom arvesager i nogle medlemsstater kan behandles af ikkejudicielle myndigheder, f.eks. notarer, som ikke er bundet af kompetencereglerne i denne forordning, kan det ikke udelukkes, at et udenretsligt forlig og en retssag vedrørende den samme arv eller at to udenretslige forlig vedrørende den samme arv indledes parallelt i forskellige medlemsstater.
Given that succession matters in some Member States may be dealt with by non-judicial authorities, such as notaries, who are not bound by the rules of jurisdiction under this Regulation, it cannot be excluded that an amicable out-of-court settlement and court proceedings relating to the same succession, or two amicable out-of-court settlements relating to the same succession, may be initiated in parallel in different Member States.
For at borgerne med fuld retssikkerhed kan nyde godt af de fordele, som det indre marked indebærer, bør denne forordning give dem mulighed for på forhånd at vide, hvilken lov der vil finde anvendelse på arven efter dem.
In order to allow citizens to avail themselves, with all legal certainty, of the benefits offered by the internal market, this Regulation should enable them to know in advance which law will apply to their succession.
Der bør indføres harmoniserede lovvalgsregler for at undgå modstridende resultater.
Harmonised conflict-of-laws rules should be introduced in order to avoid contradictory results.
Hovedregelen bør sikre, at boet behandles efter en lov, der kan forudsiges, og som er nært tilknyttet boet.
The main rule should ensure that the succession is governed by a predictable law with which it is closely connected.
Af hensyn til retssikkerheden og for at undgå opdeling af arven bør denne lov omfatte hele arven, dvs. alle de ejendele, der udgør boet, uanset godernes art, og uanset om de befinder sig i en anden medlemsstat eller i et tredjeland.
For reasons of legal certainty and in order to avoid the fragmentation of the succession, that law should govern the succession as a whole, that is to say, all of the property forming part of the estate, irrespective of the nature of the assets and regardless of whether the assets are located in another Member State or in a third State.
Denne forordning bør sætte borgerne i stand til på forhånd at tilrettelægge arven efter sig ved at vælge den lov, der skal anvendes på arven.
This Regulation should enable citizens to organise their succession in advance by choosing the law applicable to their succession.
Dette valg bør begrænses til loven i et land, hvor de er statsborgere, for at sikre en tilknytning mellem afdøde og den valgte lov og for at undgå, at der vælges en lov med henblik på at lægge hindringer i vejen for berettigede forventninger hos personer, der er berettiget til tvangsarv.
That choice should be limited to the law of a State of their nationality in order to ensure a connection between the deceased and the law chosen and to avoid a law being chosen with the intention of frustrating the legitimate expectations of persons entitled to a reserved share.
Lovvalget bør være udtrykkeligt indeholdt i en erklæring i form af en dødsdisposition eller fremgå af en sådan dispositions bestemmelser.
A choice of law should be made expressly in a declaration in the form of a disposition of property upon death or be demonstrated by the terms of such a disposition.
Et lovvalg kan anses for at fremgå af en sådan dødsdisposition, når den afdøde f.eks. i sin disposition har henvist til specifikke bestemmelser i loven i det land, hvor vedkommende var statsborger, eller på anden vis har nævnt denne lov.
A choice of law could be regarded as demonstrated by a disposition of property upon death where, for instance, the deceased had referred in his disposition to specific provisions of the law of the State of his nationality or where he had otherwise mentioned that law.
Et lovvalg i henhold til denne forordning bør være gyldigt, selv om den valgte lov ikke indeholder bestemmelser om lovvalg i arvesager.
A choice of law under this Regulation should be valid even if the chosen law does not provide for a choice of law in matters of succession.
Med henblik på anvendelsen af denne forordning bør fastlæggelsen af en persons statsborgerskab eller flere statsborgerskaber løses som et præjudicielt spørgsmål.
For the purposes of the application of this Regulation, the determination of the nationality or the multiple nationalities of a person should be resolved as a preliminary question.
Den lov, der udpeges som den lov, der finder anvendelse på arven, bør anvendes på arven fra arvefaldet til overdragelsen af ejendomsretten til de goder, der udgør boet, til de arveberettigede i henhold til den udpegede lov.
The law determined as the law applicable to the succession should govern the succession from the opening of the succession to the transfer of ownership of the assets forming part of the estate to the beneficiaries as determined by that law.
Denne lov bør omfatte spørgsmål i forbindelse med bobehandlingen og hæftelse for gælden i boet.
It should include questions relating to the administration of the estate and to liability for the debts under the succession.
Når den situation opstår i en medlemsstat, ifølge hvis lov det er obligatorisk at udpege en bobestyrer, bør denne forordning gøre det muligt for en ret, som en sag indbringes for, i den pågældende medlemsstat at udpege en eller flere sådanne bobestyrere i henhold til sin egen lov.
When that situation occurs in a Member State whose law provides for the mandatory appointment of an administrator of the estate, this Regulation should allow the courts of that Member State, when seised, to appoint one or more such administrators under their own law.
For at sikre problemfri koordinering mellem den lov, der finder anvendelse på arvesagen, og loven i den medlemsstat, hvor den udpegende ret befinder sig, bør retten udpege den eller de personer, der ville være berettiget til at optræde som bobestyrer i henhold til den lov, der finder anvendelse på arvesagen, såsom f.eks. den testamentsindsatte bobestyrer eller arvingerne selv eller, hvis den lov, der finder anvendelse på arvesagen, foreskriver det, en tredjepart som bobestyrer.
In order to ensure a smooth coordination between the law applicable to the succession and the law of the Member State of the appointing court, the court should appoint the person(s) who would be entitled to administer the estate under the law applicable to the succession, such as for instance the executor of the will of the deceased or the heirs themselves or, if the law applicable to the succession so requires, a third-party administrator.
Retterne kan dog i særlige tilfælde, hvor loven kræver det, udpege en tredjepart som bobestyrer, selv om dette ikke er foreskrevet i den lov, der finder anvendelse på arvesagen.
The courts may, however, in specific cases where their law so requires, appoint a third party as administrator even if this is not provided for in the law applicable to the succession.
Såfremt afdøde havde indsat en bobestyrer i sit testamente, kan denne person ikke fratages sine beføjelser, medmindre den lov, der finder anvendelse på arvesagen, tillader, at mandatet ophører.
If the deceased had appointed an executor of the will, that person may not be deprived of his powers unless the law applicable to the succession allows for the termination of his mandate.
De beføjelser, som udøves af bobestyrere, der er udpeget i den medlemsstat, hvor sagen anlægges, bør være de beføjelser, de kan udøve i henhold til den lov, der finder anvendelse på arvesagen.
The powers exercised by the administrators appointed in the Member State of the court seised should be the powers of administration which they may exercise under the law applicable to the succession.
Hvis f.eks. arvingen udpeges til bobestyrer, bør denne således have de beføjelser til at forvalte boet, som en arving har i henhold til den pågældende lov.
Thus, if, for instance, the heir is appointed as administrator he should have the powers to administer the estate which an heir would have under that law.
Såfremt de bobestyrerbeføjelser, som kan udøves i medfør af den lov, der finder anvendelse på arven, ikke er tilstrækkelige til at bevare boets goder eller beskytte kreditorernes rettigheder eller de rettigheder, som andre personer, der har stillet garanti for den afdødes gæld, har, kan den eller de bobestyrere, der er udpeget i den medlemsstat, hvor sagen er anlagt, på et residuelt grundlag udøve de bobestyrerbeføjelser, som loven i den pågældende medlemsstat giver mulighed for til det formål.
Where the powers of administration which may be exercised under the law applicable to the succession are not sufficient to preserve the assets of the estate or to protect the rights of the creditors or of other persons having guaranteed the debts of the deceased, the administrator(s) appointed in the Member State of the court seised may, on a residual basis, exercise powers of administration to that end provided for by the law of that Member State.
Sådanne residuelle beføjelser kunne f.eks. omfatte det at opstille en liste over boets goder og gæld i boet, underrette kreditorerne om arvefaldet og opfordre dem til at fremsætte deres krav samt at træffe foreløbige, herunder sikrende, retsmidler, med det formål at bevare boets goder.
Such residual powers could include, for instance, establishing a list of the assets of the estate and the debts under the succession, informing creditors of the opening of the succession and inviting them to make their claims known, and taking any provisional, including protective, measures intended to preserve the assets of the estate.
De handlinger, som en bobestyrer foretager i kraft af disse residuelle beføjelser, bør være i overensstemmelse med den lov, der finder anvendelse på arven, for så vidt angår overdragelsen af ejendomsretten til de goder, der udgør arven, herunder transaktioner foretaget af de arveberettigede før udpegelsen af bobestyreren, hæftelsen for boets gæld samt de arveberettigedes rettigheder, herunder i givet fald retten til at vedgå sig eller give afkald på arven.
The acts performed by an administrator in exercise of the residual powers should respect the law applicable to the succession as regards the transfer of ownership of succession property, including any transaction entered into by the beneficiaries prior to the appointment of the administrator, liability for the debts under the succession and the rights of the beneficiaries, including, where applicable, the right to accept or to waive the succession.
Såfremt udpegelsen af en tredjepart som bobestyrer i medfør af den lov, der finder anvendelse på arven, medfører ændringer i arvingernes hæftelse, bør en sådan ændring i hæftelsen respekteres.
Where under the law applicable to the succession the appointment of a third-party administrator changes the liability of the heirs, such a change of liability should be respected.
Denne forordning bør ikke være til hinder for, at kreditorer, f.eks. via en repræsentant, kan træffe yderligere foranstaltninger, som eventuelt er til rådighed i medfør af national lov, i givet fald, i overensstemmelse med de relevante EU-instrumenter med henblik på at sikre deres rettigheder.
This Regulation should not preclude creditors, for instance through a representative, from taking such further steps as may be available under national law, where applicable, in accordance with the relevant Union instruments, in order to safeguard their rights.