natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
»Aktuel status«-oplysninger for denne tjenesteangivelse med oplysninger om:
The ‘current status’ information for this service entry providing information on:
hvorvidt det er en overvåget eller akkrediteret tjeneste, og
Whether it is a supervised or accredited service, and
selve overvågnings-/akkrediteringsstatussen.
The supervision/accreditation status itself.
Retningslinjer vedrørende redigering og brug af CSPQC-tjenesteangivelser
Editing and usage guidelines for CSPQC services entries
Hvis det i forbindelse med en angivet tjeneste, som er identificeret af en »Sdi«, sikres (garanteret af CSPQC og overvåget/akkrediteret af et overvågningsorgan (SB)/akkrediteringsorgan (AB)), at et QC, som er understøttet af et SSCD, faktisk indeholder den ETSI-definerede erklæring om QcCompliance og faktisk indeholder QcSSCD-erklæringen og/eller QCP + Object Identifier (OID), er anvendelsen af en passende »Sdi« tilstrækkelig, og »Sie«-feltet kan anvendes valgfrit og behøver ikke indeholde oplysninger om SSCD-støtte.
If it is ensured (guarantee provided by CSPQC and supervised/accredited by Supervisory Body (SB)/Accreditation Body (AB)) that, for a listed service identified by a ‘Sdi’, any QC supported by an SSCD does contain the ETSI defined QcCompliance statement, and does contain the QcSSCD statement and/or QCP+ Object Identifier (OID), then the use of an appropriate ‘Sdi’ is sufficient and the ‘Sie’ field can be used as an option and will not need to contain the SSCD support information.
Hvis det i forbindelse med en angivet tjeneste, som er identificeret af en »Sdi«, sikres (garanteret af CSPQC og overvåget/akkrediteret af SB/AB), at et QC, som ikke er understøttet af et SSCD, faktisk indeholder erklæringen om QcCompliance og/eller QCP OID og ikke indeholder QcSSCD-erklæringen eller QCP + OID, er anvendelsen af en passende »Sdi« tilstrækkelig og »Sie«-feltet kan anvendes valgfrit og behøver ikke indeholde oplysninger om SSCD-støtte (hvilket vil sige, at det ikke er understøttet af et SSCD).
If it is ensured (guarantee provided by CSPQC and supervised/accredited by SB/AB) that, for a listed service identified by a ‘Sdi’, any QC not supported by an SSCD does contain the QcCompliance statement and/or the QCP OID, and does not contain the QcSSCD statement or QCP+ OID, then the use of an appropriate ‘Sdi’ is sufficient and the ‘Sie’ field can be used as an option and does not have to contain the SSCD support information (meaning it is not supported by an SSCD).
Som et generelt princip skal der for en CSP, som er angivet i positivlisten, være én tjenesteindgang for hvert enkelt offentlig nøgle for en certificerende tjeneste af CA/QC-typen, dvs. pr. certificeringsmyndighed, som (direkte) udsteder QC'er.
As a general default principle, for a listed CSP in the Trusted List there must be one service entry per single public key for a CA/QC type certification service, i.e. per Certification Authority (directly) issuing QCs.
De generelle retningslinjer for brug af elektroniske signaturapplikationer, -tjenester eller -produkter, som afhænger af en positivliste i overensstemmelse med de nuværende tekniske forskrifter, er som følger:
Moreover, when using this authorised exception to the default principle, the Member State must provide the necessary documentation to facilitate certification path building and verification.
En »CA/QC«»Sti«-angivelse (eller tilsvarende en CA/QC-angivelse yderligere kvalificeret som værende en »RootCA/QC« gennem anvendelse af »Sie« additionalServiceInformation Extension)
As an example, in the context of a CSPQC using one Root CA under which several CAs are issuing QCs and non-QCs, but for which the QCs do contain only the QcCompliance statement and no indication of whether it is supported by an SSCD, listing the Root CA ‘Sdi’ only would mean, under the rules explained above, that none of the QC issued under this Root CA is supported by an SSCD.
angiver, at alle udstedte slutenhedscertifikater fra den »Sdi«-identificerede CA (tilsvarende inden for CA-hierarkiet begyndende med det »Sdi«-identificerede RootCA) er QC'er forudsat, at det i certifikatet hævdes at være dette gennem anvendelse af et passende maskinprocesserbart QcStatement (dvs. QcCompliance) or/eller ETSI definerede QCP(+) OIDs (og dette sikres af overvågnings-/akkrediteringsorganet, jf. ovenstående »generelle redigeringsretningslinjer«).
If there are QCs that are actually supported by an SSCD but with no machine processable statement indicating such support included in the certificates, it would be strongly recommended to make use of the QcSSCD statement in the QCs issued in the future.
Bemærk: Hvis der ikke findes nogen oplysninger om »Sie«»Qualifications Extension«, eller hvis et slutenhedscertifikat, som hævdes at være et QC, ikke er »yderligere identificeret« gennem en tilknyttet »Sie«»Qualifications Extension«, overvåges/akkrediteres de maskinprocesserbare oplysninger, som findes i QC'et, for nøjagtighed.
In the meantime (until the last QC not containing this information has expired), the Trusted List should make use of the ‘Sie’ field and associated ‘Qualifications Extension’, e.g. providing filtering information to identify set(s) of certificates through use of specific CSPQC defined OID(s) potentially used by the CSPQC to distinguish between different types of QCs (some supported by an SSCD and some not) and associating explicit ‘SSCD support information’ to those identified (filtered) set(s) of certificates through the use of ‘Qualifiers’.
at angive kvalificeret status: »QCStatement«, der betyder, at de(t) angivne certifikat(er) er kvalificeret OG/ELLER
That means that the usage (or not) of the appropriate QcStatements (i.e. QcCompliance, QcSSCD) and/or ETSI defined QCP(+) OIDs is ensured to be in accordance with what it is claimed by the CSPQC.
to indicate the qualified status: »QCStatement« meaning the identified certificate(s) is(are) qualified;
to indicate the qualified status: ‘QCStatement’ meaning the identified certificate(s) is(are) qualified,
»QCWithSSCD« qualifier value meaning »QC supported by an SSCD«, or
‘QCWithSSCD’ qualifier value meaning ‘QC supported by an SSCD’, or
»QCNoSSCD« qualifier value meaning »QC not supported by an SSCD«, or
‘QCNoSSCD’ qualifier value meaning ‘QC not supported by an SSCD’, or
»QCSSCDStatusAsInCert« qualifier value meaning that the SSCD support information is ensured to be contained in any QC under the »Sdi«-»Sie« provided information in this CA/QC entry;
‘QCSSCDStatusAsInCert’ qualifier value meaning that the SSCD support information is ensured to be contained in any QC under the ‘Sdi’-‘Sie’ provided information in this CA/QC entry,
»QCForLegalPerson« — en kvalifikatorværdi, der betyder »certifikat udstedt til juridisk person«.
‘QCForLegalPerson’ qualifier value meaning ‘Certificate issued to a Legal Person’
En lignende bestemmelse kan anvendes for certificeringstjenester, der udsteder ikke-kvalificerede certifikater (af en »CA/PKC« tjenestetype).
A similar provision can apply to certification services issuing non-qualified certificates (of a ‘CA/PKC’ service type).
Positivlisten skal indeholde certifikatgyldighedsstatustjenester, hvis der ikke findes relaterede placeringsoplysninger for sådanne tjenester i de slutenhedscertifikater, for hvilke certifikatgyldighedsstatustjenesterne anvendes.
The Trusted List shall include certificate validity status services when related location information for such services is not present in the end-entity certificates to which the certificate validity status services apply.
Som defineret i artikel 2, stk. 11, i direktiv 1999/93/EF.
As defined in Article 2(11) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Certificeringsmyndighed (Certification Authority)
Certification Authority
en certificeringstjenesteudbyder, der generer og tildeler offentlige nøglecertifikater eller
a certification service provider that creates and assigns public key certificates; or
en teknisk certifikatgenereringstjeneste, der bruges af en certificeringstjenesteudbyder, der genererer og tildeler offentlige nøglecertifikater.
a technical certificate generation service that is used by a certification service provider that creates and assign public key certificates.
BEMÆRK: Se punkt 4 i EN 319 411-2 [11] for yderligere forklaring af konceptet certificeringsmyndighed.
NOTE: See clause 4 of EN 319 411-2 [11] for further explanation of the concept of certification authority.
Certificeringsmyndighed, der udsteder kvalificerede certifikater (Certification Authority issuing Qualified Certificates)
Certification Authority issuing Qualified Certificates
Som defineret i artikel 2, stk. 9, i direktiv 1999/93/EF.
As defined in Article 2(9) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kvalificeret certifikat (Qualified Certificate)
Qualified Certificate
Som defineret i artikel 2, stk. 10, i direktiv 1999/93/EF.
As defined in Article 2(10) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Som defineret i artikel 2, stk. 3, i direktiv 1999/93/EF.
As defined in Article 2(3) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Henviser til den overvågning, der er fastsat i artikel 3, stk. 3, i direktiv 1999/93/EF.
Refers to supervision provided for in Article 3(3) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
I henhold til direktiv 1999/93/EF skal medlemsstaterne oprette et passende system, der muliggør overvågning af CSP'er, som er etableret på deres område og udsteder kvalificerede certifikater til offentligheden, og sikrer overvågning og opfyldelse af direktivets bestemmelser.
Directive 1999/93/EC requires Member States to establish an appropriate system allowing the supervision of CSPs which are established on their territory and issue qualified certificates to the public, ensuring the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in that Directive.
Som defineret i artikel 2, stk. 13, i direktiv 1999/93/EF.
As defined in Article 2(13) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Betegner den liste, der angiver overvågnings-/akkrediteringsstatus for certificeringstjenester fra certificeringstjenesteudbydere, som overvåges/akkrediteres af den pågældende medlemsstat for overholdelse af bestemmelserne i direktiv 1999/93/EF.
Designates the list indicating the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Services Providers who are supervised/accredited by the referenced Member State for compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC.
En form for underskrevet liste, der anvendes som grundlag for angivelse af statusoplysninger for Trust services, jf. forskrifterne i ETSI TS 119612.
Form of a signed list used as the basis for presentation of trust service status information according to the specifications laid down in the ETSI TS 119 612.
Tjeneste, som øger pålideligheden af og tilliden til elektroniske transaktioner (typisk, men ikke nødvendigvis, ved brug af krypteringsteknikker eller ved anvendelse af fortroligt materiale) (ETSI TS 119612).
Service which enhances trust and confidence in electronic transactions (typically, but not necessarily, using cryptographic techniques or involving confidential material) (ETSI TS 119 612).
BEMÆRK: Dette udtryk har en bredere betydning end certificeringstjenester, der udsteder certifikater eller udbyder andre tjenester i forbindelse med elektroniske signaturer.
NOTE: This term is used with a broader application than certification service issuing certificates or providing other services related to electronic signatures.
Som eksempler på binære TrST'er kan nævnes certifikater, certifikatophævelseslister (CRL'er), tidsstemplingstokens (TST'er) og onlinecertifikatstatusprotokolsvar (OCSP-svar).
Examples of binary TrSTs are certificates, Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs), Time Stamp Tokens (TSTs) and Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) responses.
En AdES, der understøttes af et QC, og som genereres af et sikkert signaturgenereringssystem (SSCD), jf. definitionen i artikel 2 i direktiv 1999/93/EF.
An AdES supported by a QC and which is created by a secure signature creation device as defined in Article 2 of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Avanceret elektronisk signatur (Advanced Electronic Signature)
Advanced Electronic Signature
Som defineret i artikel 2, stk. 2, i direktiv 1999/93/EF.
As defined in Article 2(2) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Sikkert signaturgenereringssystem (Secure Signature Creation Device)
Secure Signature Creation Device
Som defineret i artikel 2, stk. 6, i direktiv 1999/93/EF.
As defined in Article 2(6) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
I den følgende del af dokumentet skal nøgleordene »SKAL«, »MÅ IKKE«, »PÅKRÆVET«, »BØR«, »BØR IKKE«, »ANBEFALET«, »KAN« og »VALGFRI« tolkes som beskrevet i RFC 2119 [12].
Within the following chapters, the key words ‘MUST’, ‘MUST NOT’, ‘REQUIRED’, ‘SHALL’, ‘SHALL NOT’, ‘SHOULD’, ‘SHOULD NOT’, ‘RECOMMENDED’, ‘MAY’, and ‘OPTIONAL’ are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [12].
Nærværende forskrifter bygger på de forskrifter og krav, som er angivet i ETSI TS 119612 v1.1.1 (herefter kaldet ETSI TS 119612).
The present specifications are relying on the specifications and requirements stated in ETSI TS 119 612 v1.1.1 (here after referred to as ETSI TS 119 612).
Hvis der ikke er angivet noget specifikt krav i nærværende forskrifter, SKAL kravene i punkt 5 og 6 i ETSI TS 119612 finde fuld anvendelse.
When no specific requirement is stated in the present specifications, requirements from ETSI TS 119 612 clauses 5 and 6 SHALL apply entirely.
Når der er angivet specifikke krav i nærværende forskrifter, SKAL de have forrang over de tilsvarende krav fra ETSI TS 119612.
When specific requirements are stated in the present specifications, they SHALL prevail over the corresponding requirements from ETSI TS 119 612.
I tilfælde af uoverensstemmelser mellem nærværende forskrifter og forskrifterne i ETSI TS 119612, SKAL nærværende forskrifter betragtes som de normative.
In case of discrepancies between the present specifications and specifications from ETSI TS 119 612, the present specifications SHALL be the normative ones.
Dette felt er PÅKRÆVET og SKAL være i overensstemmelse med specifikationerne fra TS 119612 punkt 5.3.4.
This field SHALL be present and SHALL comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.4.
Et land KAN have separate overvågnings- og akkrediteringsorganer og endda yderligere organer til andre operationelle relaterede aktiviteter.
A country MAY have separate Supervisory and Accreditation Bodies and even additional bodies for whatever operational related activities.
Det er op til den enkelte medlemsstat at udpege en operatør (Scheme operator) for medlemsstatens positivliste.
It is up to each Member State to designate the Scheme operator of the Member State Trusted List.
Det forventes, at overvågningsorganet, akkrediteringsorganet og operatøren (når disse er separate organer) får hver sit ansvarsområde og hver sine forpligtelser.
It is expected that the Supervisory Body, the Accreditation Body and the Scheme Operator (when they appear to be separate bodies) will each of them have their own responsibility and liability.
En eventuel situation, hvor flere organer er ansvarlige for overvågning, akkreditering eller de operationelle aspekter, SKAL konsekvent afspejles og angives som sådan i oplysningerne om ordningen, der indgår i positivlisten, herunder de oplysninger, der er specifikke for ordningen, og som er angivet i »Scheme information URI« (punkt 5.3.7).
Any situation in which several bodies are responsible for supervision, accreditation or operational aspects SHALL be consistently reflected and identified as such in the Scheme information as part of the Trusted List, including in the scheme-specific information indicated by the ‘Scheme information URI’ (clause 5.3.7).
Dette felt er PÅKRÆVET og SKAL være i overensstemmelse med specifikationerne fra TS 119612 punkt 5.3.6, hvori det følgende navn SKAL anvendes for ordningen:
This field SHALL be present and SHALL comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.6 where the following name SHALL be used for the scheme:
»den liste, der angiver overvågnings-/akkrediteringsstatus for certificeringstjenester fra certificeringstjenesteudbydere, som af den pågældende medlemsstat bag ordningen overvåges/akkrediteres for overholdelse af de relevante bestemmelser i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 1999/93/EF af 13. december 1999 om en fællesskabsramme for elektroniske signaturer«.
‘Supervision/Accreditation Status List of certification services from Certification Service Providers, which are supervised/accredited by the referenced Scheme Operator’s Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.’
Dette felt er PÅKRÆVET og SKAL være i overensstemmelse med specifikationerne fra TS 119612, punkt 5.3.7, hvori de »passende oplysninger om ordningen« mindst SKAL omfatte:
This field SHALL be present and SHALL comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.7 where the ‘appropriate information about the scheme’ SHALL include as a minimum:
Indledende oplysninger, som er fælles for alle medlemsstater, vedrørende positivlistens anvendelsesområde og kontekst og den/de pågældende overvågnings-/akkrediteringsordning(er).
Introductory information common to all Member States with regard to the scope and context of the Trusted List, and the underlying supervision/accreditation scheme(s).
Den nedenstående tekst er den fælles tekst, der bruges, hvori tekststrengen »[name of the relevant Member State]« SKAL erstattes med navnet på den pågældende medlemsstat:
The common text to be used is the text below, in which the character string ‘[name of the relevant Member State]’ SHALL be replaced by the name of the relevant Member State:
»The present list is the »Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers« providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
‘The present list is the ‘Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers’ providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
listing and providing reliable information on the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers, who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC;
listing and providing reliable information on the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers, who are supervised/accredited by [name of the relevant Member State] for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC,
The applicable »supervision« system (respectively »voluntary accreditation« system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Article 3(3), Article 8(1), Article 11 (respectively, Article 2(13), Article 3(2), Article 7(1)(a), Article 8(1), Article 11).
The applicable ‘supervision’ system (respectively ‘voluntary accreditation’ system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Article 3(3), Article 8(1), Article 11 (respectively, Article 2(13), Article 3(2), Article 7(1)(a), Article 8(1), Article 11).
Additional information on other supervised/accredited CSPs not issuing QCs but providing services related to electronic signatures (e.g. CSP providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSP issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) are included in the Trusted List at a national level on a voluntary basis.«
Additional information on other supervised/accredited CSPs not issuing QCs but providing services related to electronic signatures (e.g. CSP providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSP issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) are included in the Trusted List at a national level on a voluntary basis.’
Specifikke oplysninger om den/de pågældende overvågnings-/akkrediteringsordning(er), herunder især [13]: oplysninger om det overvågningssystem, som finder anvendelse på CSPQC
Specific information on the underlying supervision/accreditation scheme(s), in particular [13]: Information on the supervision system applicable to any CSPQC,
eventuelle oplysninger om den nationale frivillige akkrediteringsordning, der finder anvendelse på CSPQC
Information, when applicable, on the national voluntary accreditation scheme applicable to any CSPQC,
eventuelle oplysninger om den nationale frivillige akkrediteringsordning, der finder anvendelse på CSP'er, der ikke udsteder QC'er.
Information, when applicable, on the national voluntary accreditation scheme applicable to any CSP not issuing QCs.
Disse særlige oplysninger SKAL for hver af de pågældende ovenfor angivne ordninger mindst omfatte:
This specific information SHALL include, at least, for each underlying scheme listed above:
en generel beskrivelse
General description,
oplysninger om den proces, som overvågnings-/akkrediteringsorganet følger med henblik på overvågning/akkreditering af CSP'er, og som CSP'er følger i forbindelse med overvågningen/akkrediteringen
Information about the process followed by the Supervisory/Accreditation Body to supervise/accredit CSPs and by the CSPs for being supervised/accredited,
Eventuelle særlige oplysninger om specifikke »kvalifikationer«, som nogle af de fysiske eller binære (logiske) genstande, der er genereret eller udstedt som følge af den leverede certificeringstjeneste, kan være berettiget til at modtage, fordi de overholder nationalt fastsatte bestemmelser og krav, herunder betydningen af en sådan »kvalifikation« og de hermed forbundne nationale bestemmelser og krav.
Specific information, when applicable, on the specific ‘qualifications’ some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level including the meaning of such a ‘qualification’ and the associated national provisions and requirements.
Yderligere oplysninger om ordningen, som er specifikke for medlemsstaten, KAN afgives på frivillig basis såsom:
Additional Member State specific information about the scheme MAY be provided on a voluntary basis such as:
oplysninger om de kriterier og bestemmelser, som anvendes til at udvælge tilsynsførende/revisorer og definere, hvordan CSP'er overvåges (kontrolleres)/akkrediteres (revideres)
Information about the criteria and rules used to select supervisors/auditors and defining how CSPs are supervised (controlled)/accredited (audited) by them,
Dette felt er PÅKRÆVET og SKAL være i overensstemmelse med specifikationerne fra TS 119612 punkt 5.3.9 og SKAL indeholde mindst to URI'er:
This field SHALL be present and SHALL comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.9 and SHALL include at least two URIs:
En URI, som er fælles for alle medlemsstaters positivlister, der peger mod en beskrivende tekst, som SKAL gælde for alle positivlister:
A URI common to all Member States’ Trusted Lists pointing towards a descriptive text that SHALL be applicable to all Trusted Lists, as follows:
»Participation in a scheme
‘Participation in a scheme