natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For de undersøgte eksporterende producenter udgør de udligningsberettigede subsidiebeløb, der blev fastsat i overensstemmelse med grundforordningen, mellem 7,5 % og 12,4 %, udtrykt i værdi.
The amount of countervailable subsidies determined in accordance with the provisions of the basic Regulation, expressed ad valorem, for the investigated exporting producers range between 7,5 % and 12,4 %.
Disse subsidiebeløb overstiger den bagatelgrænse, der er omhandlet i grundforordningens artikel 14, stk. 5.
These amounts of subsidisation exceed the de minimis threshold mentioned under Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
I denne forbindelse skal det erindres, at kun to kendte eksporterende producenter af den pågældende vare udviste samarbejdsvilje.
In this respect, it is recalled that only two known exporting producers of the product concerned cooperated.
Disse eksportørers andel af det samlede salg i Unionen af den pågældende vare fra de indiske eksporterende producenter kan ikke fastslås ud fra tilgængelige statistiske oplysninger i Indien eller Unionen.
From the available Indian and Union statistical information the share of these exporters in the total Union sales of Indian exporting producers of the product concerned cannot be established.
Disse statistiske data tyder dog på, at der findes andre producenter, som kunne sælge den pågældende vare til Unionen.
However, those statistical data would suggest that there are other producers which could sell the product concerned to the Union.
Det blev fastslået, at de samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter i NUP fortsat opnåede fordele af udligningsberettigede subsidier fra den indiske regering.
It was established that during the RIP, the cooperating exporting producers continued to benefit from countervailable subsidisation by the Indian government.
Ovennævnte undersøgte subsidieringsordninger medfører tilbagevendende fordele, og der er ingen tegn på, at de vil blive afviklet eller ændret i overskuelig fremtid, eller at de samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter vil ophøre med at drage fordel af disse ordninger.
The subsidy schemes analysed above give recurring benefits and there are no indications that these programmes would be phased out or modified in the foreseeable future or that the cooperating exporting producers would stop obtaining benefits under these schemes.
Der foreligger ingen oplysninger, som tyder på, at de øvrige eksporterende producenter ikke ville fortsætte med at drage fordel af de ovenfor undersøgte subsidieordninger.
There is no information available which would indicate that the other exporting producers would not continue to benefit from the subsidy schemes analysed above.
Det konkluderes derfor, at subsidieringen fortsætter på landsdækkende plan.
It is therefore concluded that the subsidisation at the country-wide level continued.
På baggrund af ovennævnte resultater konkluderes det, at subsidieringen er fortsat i NUP, og at den sandsynligvis vil fortsætte i fremtiden.
In view of the findings described above it is concluded that subsidisation continued during the RIP and would be likely to continue in the future.
EU-PRODUKTIONEN
UNION PRODUCTION
I den fornyede undersøgelsesperiode blev samme vare fremstillet i Unionen af følgende producenter: Sandoz, DSM, Deretil, ACS Dobfar SpA og Antibioticos S.A.. Ansøgerne anmodede om en udløbsundersøgelse af de gældende antisubsidieforanstaltninger.
During the review investigation period, the like product was manufactured in the Union by the following Union producers: Sandoz, DSM, Deretil, ACS Dobfar SpA and Antibioticos S.A.. The applicants requested an expiry review of the anti-subsidy measures in force.
Alle tilgængelige oplysninger om EU-producenterne, herunder oplysninger anført i anmodningen og oplysninger indsamlet fra EU-producenterne før og efter undersøgelsens indledning, blev anvendt til at fastsætte den samlede EU-produktion.
All available information concerning Union producers, including information provided in the request and data collected from Union producers before and after the initiation of the review investigation, was used in order to establish the total Union production.
På dette grundlag blev den samlede EU-produktion i NUP anslået til 7093 tons.
On that basis, the estimated total Union production during the RIP was 7093 tonnes.
De EU-producenter, der tegner sig for den samlede produktion i Unionen, udgør EU-erhvervsgrenen, jf. grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 1, i det følgende benævnt »EU-erhvervsgrenen«.
The Union producers accounting for the total Union production constitute the Union industry within the meaning of Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation and are hereafter referred to as the ‘Union industry’.
Da samme vare fremstillet af de tre EU-producenter, der besvarede et spørgeskema, i undersøgelsesperioden tegnede sig for op til 95 % af den samlede EU-produktion af samme vare, anses disse producenters oplysninger for at være repræsentative for hele EU-erhvervsgrenen.
Since the like product produced by the three Union producers who submitted a questionnaire response during the RIP represented up to 95 % of the total Union production of the like product, these producers’ data are considered to be representative of the entire Union industry.
Med henblik på en analyse af importmængder og –priser i den betragtede periode, anvendtes Eurostats importstatistikker for Taric-kode 2941101010, 2941102010 og 2941900030 for 2007 og 2008 og Taric-kode 2941100010 og 2941900030 for året 2009 og fremefter.
To analyse the import volumes and price trends, the Eurostat import statistics for TARIC codes 2941101010, 2941102010 and 2941900030 for the years 2007 and 2008 and TARIC codes 2941100010 and 2941900030 for the year 2009 and onwards, as applicable during the period considered, were used.
I betragtning af antallet af producenter i Unionen og det forhold, at en EU-producent fremstillede samme vare under en forarbejdningsaftale med en anden producent, er oplysningerne vedrørende EU-erhvervsgrenen af hensyn til fortrolighed kun fremstillet som indekstal eller intervaller.
Taking into account the number of Union producers and the fact that one Union producer was producing the like product under a tolling agreement with another one, the information concerning the Union industry, where necessary, has been shown in indices or in ranges only, in order to protect confidentiality of data.
Forbruget på EU-markedet
Consumption in the Union market
Samme vare sælges af EU-erhvervsgrenen til ikke forretningsmæssigt forbundne kunder og sælges/overføres til forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomheder med henblik på yderligere forarbejdning.
The like product is sold by the Union industry to unrelated customers and sold/transferred to related companies for further downstream processing.
Kommissionen beregnede det åbenbare forbrug i Unionen af den pågældende vare og samme vare som summen af:
In calculating the apparent Union consumption of the product concerned and the like product, the Commission added:
den samlede importmængde af den undersøgte vare i Unionen som rapporteret af Eurostat
the volume of total imports of the product under investigation into the Union as reported by Eurostat,
salgsmængden i Unionen af samme vare fremstillet af EU-erhvervsgrenen
the volume of sales of the like product in the Union produced by the Union industry,
EU-erhvervsgrenens afsætning på bundne markeder af samme vare og
the volume of captive use of the like product by the Union industry, and
andre kendte EU-producenters anslåede salg af samme vare i Unionen.
the estimated sales of the like product in the Union by other known Union producers.
Det bør bemærkes, at salg i henhold til forarbejdningsaftaler mellem to EU-producenter for at undgå dobbelttælling af salgsmængden blev udelukket fra ovennævnte beregning.
It should be noted that, in order to avoid double-counting of sales volumes, the sales made under a tolling agreement between two Union producers were excluded from the above calculation.
På ovennævnte grundlag steg EU-forbruget af den pågældende vare og samme vare gradvist med 28 % i den betragtede periode:
On the above basis, the Union consumption of the product concerned and the like product gradually increased by 28 % during the period considered:
Forbrug (tons)
Consumption (in tonnes)
Importen fra Indien
Imports from India
Import (tons)
Imports (in tonnes)
Import af den pågældende vare med henblik på fri omsætning
Product concerned imports for free circulation
Import af den pågældende vare under ordningen for aktiv forædling
Product concerned imports under inward processing regime
Ifølge oplysninger fra Eurostat er mængden af importen af den pågældende vare fra Indien med henblik på fri omsætning faldet med 96 % i den betragtede periode.
According to Eurostat data, the volume of imports of the product concerned from India for free circulation has decreased by 96 % during the period considered.
I 2008 observeredes et betydeligt fald på 51 procentpoint, som blev efterfulgt af en yderligere nedgang på 43 procentpoint i 2009 og 2 procentpoint i NUP.
A considerable drop by 51 percentage points has been observed in 2008 then followed by a further decrease by 43 percentage points in 2009 and two percentage points in the RIP.
En lidt anden tendens kunne iagttages for importen under ordningen for aktiv forædling, der er fri for udligningstold og told.
A slightly different trend could be observed for imports under inward processing regime which are free from countervailing and custom duties.
Efter et første fald i importen på 92 % mellem 2007 og 2008 steg importen i 2009 og forblev forholdsvis stabil i NUP.
After an initial fall in imports by 92 % between 2007 and 2008, imports increased in 2009 and remained relatively stable in the RIP.
Gennemsnitlig importpris (EUR/ton)
Average import price (EUR/tonne)
De forskellige pristendenser for de to importordninger kan forklares ved, at den type pågældende vare, som primært blev importeret — cefalexin — var forholdsmæssigt dyrere end andre typer.
The different price trends between the two import regimes can be explained by the different type of the product concerned that was mainly imported, i.e. cefalexin, which is comparatively more expensive than other types.
Markedsandel for importen fra Indien
Market share of imports from India
Import af den pågældende vare med henblik på fri omsætning
Product concerned, imports for free circulation
Markedsandelen for importen fra Indien til fri omsætning eller under ordningen for aktiv forædling, var meget lav i den betragtede periode og faldt i begge tilfælde.
The market share of imports from India for free circulation or made under inward processing regime was very low over the period considered and decreased in both cases.
Én EU-producent tilkendegav, at importen fra Indien, der var baseret på Eurostat-data, var blevet forkert beregnet, idet indiske eksportstatistikker angiver højere eksportmængder end Eurostat.
One Union producer indicated that Indian imports, which were based on Eurostat data, had been wrongly estimated as Indian export statistics show higher export volumes than those stated by Eurostat.
I denne forbindelse bør det bemærkes, at det er Kommissionens faste praksis at anvende Eurostat som grundlag for importstatistikker.
In this regard, it should be noted that it is the Commission’s standard practice to use Eurostat as a basis for import statistics.
Det skal desuden bemærkes, at de indiske eksportstatistikker ikke angiver den endelige destination for eksporten, samt hvorvidt denne rent faktisk er kommet ind i Unionen.
It is further noted that Indian export statistics do not indicate the final destination of the exports and whether they will actually enter the Union.
Som følge af den ekstremt lave importmængde fra Indien til fri omsætning på EU-markedet kunne der ikke drages anvendelige konklusioner med hensyn til prisunderbud.
In view of the extremely low quantity of imports from India that entered the Union market for free circulation, no meaningful conclusion could be drawn in regard to price undercutting.
Med hensyn til importen under ordningen for aktiv forædling var underbudsmargenen negativ.
In regard to the imports under the inward processing regime, the undercutting margin found was negative.
Denne import udgjorde mindre end 10 tons og vedrørte kun én produkttype (cefalexin), som også er den dyreste, og som er en mindre udbredt varetype på markedet.
However, these imports amounted to less than 10 tonnes and concerned only one product type (cefalexin), which is also the most expensive and less represented product type on the market.
Det blev derfor konkluderet, at transaktionsoplysningerne om importen under ordningen for aktiv forædling ikke var repræsentative med henblik på en anvendelig beregning af underbud og ikke egnede sig til nærmere analyse.
Therefore, it was concluded that the transaction data concerning imports under the inward processing regime were not representative for the purpose of a meaningful undercutting calculation and not suitable for further analysis.
Én EU-producent fremførte, at en separat analyse af de to kategorier af import, henholdsvis til fri omsætning og under ordningen for aktiv forædling, ikke var i overensstemmelse med fremgangsmåden i den tidligere fornyede undersøgelse og desuden i strid med Kommissionens faste praksis.
One Union producer indicated that a segregated analysis of the two categories of imports, i.e. for free circulation and under the inward processing regime, was not in line with the approach of the previous review proceeding and was also contrary to consistent Commission practice.
I denne forbindelse skal det bemærkes, at den mængde, der importeres enten under ordningen for aktiv forædling eller til fri omsætning som konkluderet i betragtning 115 ikke var tilstrækkelig til, at der kunne drages anvendelige konklusioner.
In this regard, it should be noted that as concluded in recital 115, quantities imported either under the inward processing regime or for free circulation were not sufficient to allow meaningful conclusions to be drawn.
I betragtning af den lave kumulerede mængde gælder denne konklusion ligeledes for denne mængde.
Considering the low level of the aggregated volume, this conclusion equally applies to that volume.
Importen af den vare, der er omfattet af undersøgelsen, fra andre lande end Indien steg med 62 % i den betragtede periode, og markedsandelen steg kraftigt med mere end 10 procentpoint fra 37,6 % til 47,7 %, hvilket faldt sammen med det øgede forbrug på EU-markedet.
Imports of the product under review from countries other than India increased by 62 % during the period considered, with market share surging by more than 10 percentage points from 37,6 % to 47,7 %, which coincided with the increased consumption on the Union market.
Blandt de eksporterende lande har Singapore, Kina og Oman har været de største leverandører på EU-markedet.
Among exporting countries, Singapore, China and Oman have been the major suppliers on the Union market.
Gennemsnitlig importpris pr. ton (EUR)
Average import price per tonne (EUR)
De gennemsnitlige importpriser fra tredjelande er faldet betydeligt, nemlig med 43 % i løbet af den betragtede periode.
Average import prices from third countries have decreased significantly by 43 % over the period considered.
Selv om priserne på varerne fra de vigtigste eksportlande (Singapore, Kina og Oman) underbød EU-priserne med ca. 20 % i NUP fra vare til vare, og importmængderne kan betragtes som betydelige, påvirkede denne lavprisimport tilsyneladende ikke EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet.
Although the prices of the main exporting countries (Singapore, China and Oman) undercut the Union prices by around 20 % in the RIP on a product per product basis and the import volumes can be regarded as significant, such low priced imports did apparently not affect the profitability of the Union industry.
Én EU-producent fremførte, at analysen af udviklingen af den gennemsnitlige importpris burde have taget hensyn til de forskellige varetyper.
One Union producer claimed that the analysis of the average import price trends should have taken account of the various product types.
I denne forbindelse bør det bemærkes, at analysen af bl.a. prisudviklingen i overensstemmelse med fast praksis bør foretages på grundlag af den pågældende vare, uanset hver enkelt varetypes andel.
In this regard, it should be noted that, in line with standard practice, the analysis of, inter alia, price trends has to be made on the basis of the product concerned regardless of the share of each product type.
Det bemærkes endvidere, at der i denne sag ikke blev draget nogen konklusion på basis af udviklingen i priserne på importen fra tredjelande i den betragtede periode.
It is further noted that, in this case, no conclusion was drawn from the trend in import prices from third countries over the period considered.
Ovennævnte påstand måtte derfor afvises.
The above claim therefore had to be rejected.
Alle EU-producenter fremførte, at importen fra bl.a. Kina og Oman hovedsagelig består af amoxicillin trihydrat til veterinær brug, og at dette burde have været taget i betragtning i analysen af ovennævnte priser.
All Union producers claimed that imports from, inter alia, China and Oman are mainly of amoxicillin trihydrate for veterinary use and this should have been taken into account in the analysis of the above prices.
I denne forbindelse bemærkes det, at den undersøgte vare omfatter antibiotika til både mennesker og dyr.
In this regard, it is noted that the product under review covers antibiotics for both human and veterinary consumption.
Oplysningerne til støtte for denne påstand blev ikke dokumenteret.
Furthermore, the information provided in support of this allegation was not substantiated.
Én EU-producent stillede spørgsmålstegn ved det grundlag, hvorpå prissammenligninger for amoxicillin trihydrat og ampicillin trihydrat blev foretaget i NUP, i betragtning af at der i Eurostats data ikke skelnes mellem disse to varetyper.
One Union producer questioned the basis on which price comparisons for amoxicillin trihydrate and ampicillin trihydrate were made in the RIP given the fact that Eurostat data does not distinguish between these two product types.
Da det i denne forbindelse blev konstateret, at EU-erhvervsgrenens priser for disse to varetyper var sammenlignelige, var det ikke urimeligt at foretage en aggregeret prissammenligning.
In this regard, as it was found that the Union industry’s prices of these two product types were similar, it was not unreasonable to make an aggregate price comparison.
For så vidt angår importen fra Singapore hævdede alle EU-producenter, at denne fandt sted til overførselspris mellem forretningsmæssigt forbundne parter.
As far as imports from Singapore are concerned, all Union producers claimed that they were made at transfer price between related parties.
Under disse omstændigheder ville inddragelsen af denne import fordreje de gennemsnitlige priser fra andre tredjelande.
In these circumstances, to include these imports would distort the average prices from other third countries.
Det bemærkes, at ovennævnte konklusion med hensyn til underbudsmargenen ikke ville ændres væsentligt, hvis denne import blev udelukket fra prissammenligningen, og at den konklusion, at lavprisimporten ikke påvirkede EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet fortsat ville være gyldig.
It is noted that, if these imports were to be excluded from the price comparison, the above mentioned finding with regard to the undercutting margin would not change significantly and the conclusion that the low priced imports did not affect the profitability of the Union industry would remain valid.
For følgende økonomiske indikatorer for EU-erhvervsgrenen fandtes det, at en anvendelig analyse og evaluering måtte koncentreres om situationen på det frie marked: salgsmængde og salgspriser på EU-markedet, markedsandel og rentabilitet.
For the following economic indicators relating to the Union industry, it was found that a meaningful analysis and evaluation had to focus on the situation prevailing on the free market: sales volume and sales prices on the Union market, market share and profitability.
Når det var muligt og berettiget, blev resultaterne efterfølgende sammenlignet med oplysningerne for det bundne marked for at tilvejebringe et fuldstændigt billede af EU-erhvervsgrenens situation.
Where possible and justified, these findings were subsequently compared with the data for the captive market, in order to provide a full picture of the situation of the Union industry.
For så vidt angår andre økonomiske indikatorer fremgik det imidlertid af undersøgelsen, at disse kun med rimelighed kunne undersøges med henvisning til den samlede aktivitet.
As regards other economic indicators, however, it was found on the basis of the investigation, that they could reasonably be examined only by referring to the whole activity.
Produktionen (til såvel det bundne som det frie marked), kapaciteten, kapacitetsudnyttelsen, lagerbeholdningerne, investeringerne, beskæftigelsen, produktiviteten, lønningerne, væksten samt evnen til at tilvejebringe kapital afhænger af den samlede aktivitet, uanset om produktionen er bundet eller sælges på det frie marked.
Indeed, production (for both the captive and the free market), capacity, capacity utilisation, inventories, investments, stocks, employment, productivity, wages, growth, ability to raise capital depend upon the whole activity, whether the production is captive or sold on the free market.
Som følge af bemærkninger modtaget fra en EU-producent om den endelige fremlæggelse af de kendsgerninger og betragtninger, på grundlag af hvilke det påtænktes at afslutte proceduren, er nogle af de økonomiske indikatorer i nedenstående betragtninger blevet korrigeret.
Following comments received from one Union producer on the final disclosure of the facts and considerations on the basis of which it was proposed to terminate the proceeding, some of the economic indicators in the following recitals have been corrected.
Disse ændringer var ikke af en sådan art, at de kunne ændre konklusionen med hensyn til EU-erhvervsgrenens situation.
These changes were not of a nature to change the conclusion with regard to the situation of the Union industry.
EU-erhvervsgrenens produktionskapacitet var stabil mellem 2007 og 2008, inden den steg med 4 % fra 2008 til 2009 og med yderligere 3 procentpoint i NUP.
The Union industry’s production capacity was stable between 2007 and 2008 before increasing by 4 % from 2008 to 2009 and by a further 3 percentage points in the RIP.
Produktionsmængden fulgte imidlertid ikke denne stigning på grund af en EU-producents uforudsete tekniske vanskeligheder i 2008, hvor produktionsmængden faldt med 5 % og gradvist igen steg frem til NUP.
However, the production volume did not follow this increase due to unforeseen technical difficulties of one Union producer in 2008, when production volume dropped by 5 % and recovered gradually until the RIP.
Som følge af stigningen i produktionskapaciteten kombineret med et lille fald i produktionen, faldt kapacitetsudnyttelsen støt i den betragtede periode og nåede i NUP et niveau, der var 9 % lavere end i 2007.
As a result of the increase in production capacity combined with a small fall in production, the capacity utilisation rate continually dropped in the period considered and reached a level in the RIP that was 9 % below that in 2007.
Salgsmængde, salgspris og markedsandel
Sales volume, sales price, market share
Salg til ikke forretningsmæssigt forbundne parter i Unionen
Sales to unrelated parties in the Union
EU-erhvervsgrenens salgsmængde til ikke forretningsmæssigt forbundne parter i NUP var lidt lavere end i 2007, faldt med 7 % i 2009 og steg derefter med 6 procentpoint i NUP.
The Union industry’s sales volume to unrelated parties in the RIP was slightly below the level of 2007, dropping by 7 % in 2009 and then increasing by six percentage points during the RIP.
EU-erhvervsgrenens gennemsnitlige salgspris på EU-markedet steg med 4 % i løbet af den betragtede periode.
The average sales price of the Union industry on the Union market increased by 4 % over the period considered.