natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I en sådan situation undersøges forekomsten af væsentlig skade for EU-erhvervsgrenen, udelukkende for så vidt angår produktion og salg af den pågældende vare.
Nevertheless, in such a situation, the possible existence of material injury to the Union industry is investigated exclusively for the production and sales of the product concerned.
I den foreliggende sag er der blevet konstateret væsentlig skade i forbindelse med salget af den pågældende vare, jf. betragtning 77-93 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the present case, material injury has been found in the business of the product concerned as explained in recitals 77 to 93 of the provisional Regulation.
Parterne fremlagde ingen dokumentation, der viste, at konklusionerne i disse betragtninger ikke er korrekte, og at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke havde lidt væsentlig skade i UP.
The parties did not provide any evidence which would show that the findings in these recitals are not correct and that the Union industry did not suffer material injury during the IP.
En række parter hævdede, at klagernes lukning af en vis produktionskapacitet gav et misvisende billede af den skade, de angiveligt har lidt.
Some parties claimed that the closure of certain production capacity by the complainants showed a misleading picture of the alleged injury they suffered.
De hævdede, at der var andre producenter i Unionen, der bidrog til kapaciteten i Unionen, og at EU-erhvervsgrenens kapacitet voksede med investeringer i ny kapacitet.
They argued that there were other producers in the Union that contributed to the capacity in the Union and that the capacity of the Union industry increased with investments in new capacity.
Dette er næppe udtryk for en industri, der har lidt skade.
This is hardly indicative of an injured industry.
Andre parter påstod, at de reducerede investeringer ikke er et udtryk for skade, men for at produktionen flyttes ud af Unionen.
Other parties claimed that the reduction of investment does not mean injury, but means relocation of production out of the Union.
Undersøgelsen fastslog i betragtning 78 i forordningen om midlertidig told, at EU-erhvervsgrenens produktionskapacitet steg med 9 % i 2008, men derefter faldt med 10 % i undersøgelsesperioden.
The investigation established in recital 78 of the provisional Regulation that the production capacity of the Union industry increased by 9 % in 2008 but that it then decreased by 10 % during the IP.
Dette var resultatet af afgørelser, der blev truffet for at imødegå konkurrencen fra de pågældende lande, og de efterfølgende midlertidige lukninger skyldtes også presset fra dumpingimporten.
This was the result of decisions undertaken in order to face the competition from the countries concerned, and the subsequent temporary closures were also due to the pressure exerted by the dumped imports.
Hvad angår investeringer, konstateredes det i betragtning 89 i forordningen om midlertidig told, at EU-erhvervsgrenens investeringer i EU faldt med 35 % i den betragtede periode.
With regard to investments, it was established in recital 89 of the provisional Regulation that investments made by the Union industry in the Union decreased by 35 % during the period considered.
Dette er en af flere faktorer, som betød, at det i betragtning 92 og 93 i forordningen om midlertidig told kunne konkluderes, at EU-erhvervsgrenen led væsentlig skade i UP.
This is one of several injury factors which allowed concluding in recitals 92 and 93 of the provisional Regulation that the Union industry suffered material injury during the IP.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende lagre, beskæftigelse, lønninger og produktivitet, rentabilitet, likviditet, investeringer, investeringsafkast og evnen til at rejse kapital, vækst samt omfanget af den faktiske dumpingmargen, bekræftes betragtning 85-91 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of other comments concerning stocks, employment, wages and productivity, profitability, cash flow, investments return on investments and ability to raise capital, growth and magnitude of the actual dumping margin, recitals 85 to 91 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Udviklingen efter UP
Post IP developments
En række parter hævdede, at der ikke var bevis for, at EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt væsentlig skade, og at den omstændighed, at den ene af de to oprindelige klagere havde trukket sin støtte til undersøgelsen tilbage, viste, at pågældende klager ikke havde lidt skade.
Some parties argued that there was no evidence of material injury suffered by the Union industry and the fact that one of the two original complainants had withdrawn its support to the investigation showed that it was not suffering injury.
Det blev også hævdet, at skadesindikatorerne for den anden klager ikke viste tegn på skade.
It was also argued that the injury indicators for the remaining complainant did not show a picture of injury.
Det bør bemærkes, at den pågældende virksomhed ikke modsatte sig undersøgelsen, men indtog en neutral holdning.
It should be noted that the company in question did not oppose to the investigation but took a neutral position.
Som forklaret i betragtning 57 blev det derfor stadig anset for hensigtsmæssigt at bevare begge EU-producenter som en del af EU-erhvervsgrenen.
Therefore, as explained in recital 57, it was still considered appropriate to keep both Union producers as part of the Union industry.
Det blev hævdet, at der har været en markant stigning i priserne i perioden efter UP, og at prisudviklingen i denne periode straks vil resultere i overskud for klagerne, som selv forelagde oplysninger om bedre resultater i deres offentlige udtalelser vedrørende perioden 2010-2011.
It was claimed that there has been a marked increase of prices in the post-IP period, and that these price developments in that period will immediately translate into profits for the complainants who themselves announced better results in their public statements for the period 2010-2011.
En række parter insisterede på, at der var en betydelig forbedring i EU-erhvervsgrenens situation i perioden efter UP og påpegede, at visse virksomheder planlægger at bygge nye anlæg i Unionen.
Some parties insisted that there was a significant improvement in the situation of the Union industry in the post-IP period pointing out that some companies were planning to build new facilities in the Union.
Det blev også hævdet, at i betragtning af den seneste stigning i importpriserne, bør foranstaltningerne suspenderes eller indføres i form af en mindsteimportpris.
It was also claimed that in view of the recent increase in import prices, measures should be suspended or imposed in the form of a minimum import price (MIP).
Begivenheder, der er indtruffet efter UP, tages normalt ikke i betragtning i en antidumpingundersøgelse.
Events that occurred after the IP shall normally not be taken into account in an anti-dumping investigation.
Desuden er der ingen beviser, der tyder på, at de nævnte begivenheder, der er indtruffet efter UP, er indlysende, uomtvistelige og vedvarende.
In addition, no evidence that suggests that the mentioned post-IP events are manifest, undisputed and lasting was provided.
Hvad angår en eventuel suspension af de endelige foranstaltninger, bør dette ses på baggrund af en udvikling efter undersøgelsesperioden, som ville være af varig karakter.
Concerning any suspension of the definitive measures, this should be seen in the light of post-IP developments which would be of a lasting nature.
Hvad angår indførelsen af mindsteimportpriser, anses det, at omstændighederne ikke berettiger sådanne mindsteimportpriser, jf. betragtning 122-126.
As to the imposition of an MIP, as explained in recitals 123 to 126 it is considered that the circumstances are not such as to warrant it.
Derfor afvises alle ovennævnte påstande.
Therefore all the above claims are dismissed.
Undersøgelsen bekræftede, at de fleste skadesindikatorer for EU-erhvervsgrenen viste en faldende tendens i den betragtede periode.
The Investigation confirmed that most of the injury indicators pertaining to the Union industry showed a declining trend during the period considered.
På grundlag af ovenstående bekræftes konklusionen om, at EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt væsentlig skade i undersøgelsesperioden, i betragtning 92 og 93 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Based on the above, the conclusion reached in recitals 92 and 93 of the provisional Regulation that the Union industry suffered material injury during the IP is confirmed.
En af parterne bemærkede, at analysen i betragtning 108 i forordningen om midlertidig told er mangelfuld, da den synes at forbinde et overordnet og vedvarende fald i forbruget med stigningen i importen, mens importen fra de pågældende lande udviklede sig i takt med forbruget ifølge den pågældende part.
One party observed that the analysis in recital 108 of the provisional Regulation is flawed, because it seems to link an overall and continuous decrease in consumption to the increase in imports, whereas, according to this party, imports from the countries concerned developed in line with consumption.
Det bør præciseres, at det overordnede forbrug som omhandlet i betragtning 64-66 i forordningen om midlertidig told rent faktisk steg med 2 % i den betragtede periode.
It should be clarified indeed that, as mentioned in recitals 64 to 66 of the provisional Regulation, consumption overall increased by 2 % during the period considered.
Dette rokker dog ikke ved, at der var en betydelig overordnet stigning i mængde og markedsandel for dumpingimporten til lave priser fra de pågældende lande i den betragtede periode (jf. betragtning 96 i forordningen om midlertidig told), hvorimod markedets størrelse var næsten uændret, og EU-erhvervsgrenen mistede betydelige markedsandele, navnlig mellem 2009 og UP.
However, this does not undermine the fact that there was an important overall increase in volume and market share of the low-priced dumped imports from the countries concerned during the period considered (see recital 96 of the provisional Regulation), whereas the market size remained nearly unchanged, and while the Union industry lost an important market share, in particular between 2009 and the IP.
Visse parter hævdede, at udviklingen i importen fra de pågældende lande ikke er knyttet til forringelsen af EU-erhvervsgrenens økonomiske situation, navnlig med hensyn til salgsmængde, salgsværdier og rentabilitet.
Some parties made the argument that the trends of imports from the countries concerned are not linked to the deterioration of economic situation of the Union industry, in particular sales volume, sales values and profitability.
De hævder, at der blev konstateret en forbedring i EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet, da importen steg i 2008, hvorefter den faldt markant, da importen forblev stabil.
They argue that there was an improvement in profitability of the Union industry when the imports increased in 2008, and then it fell significantly when imports remained stable.
I strid med ovenstående påstand viste undersøgelsen en generel sammenhæng mellem dumpingimporten til lave priser og den skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen led i hele den betragtede periode (jf. betragtning 95-98 i forordningen om midlertidig told).
Contrary to the above allegation, the investigation pointed to an overall correlation between the low-priced dumped imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry during the whole period considered (see recitals 95 to 98 of the provisional Regulation).
Undersøgelsen viste også, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke kunne genoprettes i den betragtede periode på grund af den øgede tilstedeværelse af dumpingimport til lave priser på EU-markedet.
The investigation also showed that the Union industry could not recover in the period considered due to the increased presence of low-priced dumped imports on the Union market.
Påstanden bør derfor afvises.
Hence, the claim should be rejected.
Det hævdedes også, at der var forskelle i tendenserne for importen alt afhængigt af den alkoholtype, som visse eksporterende producenter fremstiller, og at der derfor bør foretages en separat skadesundersøgelse for disse alkoholtyper.
It was also claimed that differences in trends in imports existed depending on the types of alcohol produced by some exporting producers, and that therefore, a separate injury analysis for these alcohols should be performed.
De forskellige typer, der er omfattet af varedækningen, har imidlertid de samme grundlæggende egenskaber.
However, the different types included in the product scope share the same basic characteristics.
Undersøgelsen afslørede ingen betydelige forskelle som følge af brugen af forskellige råvarer.
The investigation did not reveal any substantial difference between FOH produced from different raw materials.
Derfor er der i dette tilfælde ingen grund til foretage en separat analyse af tendenserne for hver enkelt alkoholtype.
Therefore there are no reasons in this case to establish a separate analysis of the trends per type of alcohol.
Det blev også fremført, at skaden ikke kan tilskrives Indien, fordi landets import ikke steg i den betragtede periode, navnlig når klagernes indkøb ikke tages i betragtning.
It was also argued that injury could not be attributed to India because its imports did not increase during the period considered, in particular when purchases by the Complainants are not taken into account.
Det blev dog konstateret, at importen fra Indien fandt sted til dumpingpriser på EU-markedet, og at skadesmargenen var langt over minimumsgrænsen på 2 %.
However, it was found that the imports from India were made at dumped prices in the Union market and that the injury margin was largely above the de minimis level of 2 %.
Desuden var betingelserne for en kumulativ vurdering for de pågældende lande opfyldt, jf. betragtning 63-65.
Moreover, as explained in recitals 63 to 65, the conditions for a cumulative assessment for the countries concerned were met.
Denne påstand bør derfor afvises.
This claim should thus be rejected.
Det blev også fremført, at skaden ikke kan tilskrives de virksomheder, hvis individuelle underbudsmargen var negativ, eller, af denne årsag, importen fra Indonesien som helhed.
It was also argued that injury could not be attributed to the companies whose individual undercutting margin was negative, or because of this reason, to imports from Indonesia as a whole.
Desuden var alle betingelserne for en kumulativ vurdering for den pågældende import opfyldt, jf. betragtning 63-65.
As explained in recitals 63 to 65, all the conditions of a cumulative assessment of the imports concerned were met.
Derfor blev de virkninger, som den billige dumpingimport med oprindelse i de pågældende lande havde på EU-erhvervsgrenen, vurderet samlet i forbindelse med analysen af skaden og årsagen til skaden.
Accordingly, the effects the low-priced dumped imports originating in the countries concerned had on the Union industry were assessed jointly for the purpose of the injury analysis and the cause of the injury.
At der ikke er tale om underbud, udelukker desuden ikke, at EU-erhvervsgrenen er blevet forvoldt væsentlig skade.
Furthermore, the absence of undercutting does not exclude the existence of material injury to the Union industry.
Som nævnt i betragtning 124-127 i forordningen om midlertidig told blev det rent faktisk konstateret, at den pris, som EU-erhvervsgrenen krævede, ikke var tilstrækkelig til at dække alle omkostninger og opnå en rimelig fortjenstmargen, som den kunne have opnået uden dumpingimport i UP.
Indeed, as explained in recitals 124 to 127 of the provisional Regulation it was found that the price charged by the Union industry was not sufficient to cover all production costs and achieve the reasonable margin of profit it could have achieved in the absence of dumped imports during the IP.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger til dumpingimportens virkninger, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 95-98 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any other comments regarding effects of the dumped imports, recitals 95 to 98 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
En række parter har hævdet, at den reelle årsag til den skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen eventuelt har lidt, burde tilskrives den finansielle krise, da erhvervsgrenen led størst skade på det tidspunkt, hvor importen fra de pågældende lande blev stabil.
Several parties have argued that the real cause of injury suffered by the Union industry should be attributed to the financial crisis, as the main harm to that industry occurred when imports from the countries concerned stabilised.
Det blev også nævnt, at forværringen af EU-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet svarede til den forværring, der er konstateret for andre virksomheder i den kemiske sektor.
It was also mentioned that the deterioration of the profitability of the Union industry was similar to that observed for other companies operating in the chemical sector.
Krisen havde betydning for EU-erhvervsgrenens resultater.
The crisis played a role in the performance of the Union industry.
Udviklingen i skadesindikatorer som f.eks. kapacitetsudnyttelse og salgsmængde viser, at EU-erhvervsgrenens situation blev forværret af krisen og blev noget bedre i takt med forbedringen på markedet.
Trends in injury factors such as capacity utilisation and sales volume show that the situation of the Union industry worsened with the crisis and somewhat improved with the recovery in the market.
Undersøgelsen viste dog, at forbedringen ikke tillod en genrejsning i EU-erhvervsgrenen, som befandt sig langt fra den økonomiske situation, der var fremherskende i begyndelsen af den betragtede periode.
However, the investigation showed that the improvement did not allow the recovery of the Union industry which was far from its economic situation that prevailed at the beginning of the period considered.
Som nævnt i betragtning 89 var 2008, dvs. lige før den finansielle krise begyndte, året med den største stigning i dumpingimporten fra de pågældende lande og det kraftigste fald i EU-erhvervsgrenens salgsmængder.
Furthermore, as mentioned in recital 89, 2008, just before the financial crisis started, was the year with the highest increase in dumped imports from the countries concerned and the sharpest decrease in sales volume of the Union industry.
Efter dette år genrejste EU-erhvervsgrenen sig ikke, og dumpingimporten var fortsat massivt til stede på EU-markedet.
After that year the Union industry did not recover and the dumped imports continued to be massively present in the Union market.
Af disse grunde står det klart, at uanset andre faktorer bidrog dumpingimporten i vidt omfang til den væsentlige skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen led i UP.
For these reasons it is clear that, regardless of other factors, dumped imports largely contributed to the material injury suffered by the Union industry during the IP.
En række parter hævdede også, at den reelle årsag til den påståede skade for EU-erhvervsgrenen skulle findes i importen fra andre tredjelande, faldet i efterspørgslen, stigningen i råvarepriserne og mangelfuld adgang til disse råvarer, EU-erhvervsgrenens forkerte strategiske beslutninger, konkurrencepresset i de efterfølgende omsætningsled, faldet i produktionen af den pågældende vare til bunden anvendelse, den generelle ændring i markedsvilkårene og konkurrencesituationen på EU-markedet.
Several parties also claimed that the real cause of the alleged injury of the Union industry was the imports from other third countries, the decrease in demand, the increased raw material prices and the lack of proper access to these raw materials, wrong strategic decisions taken by the Union industry, the competitive pressure in their downstream market, the decrease in the production of the product concerned destined for captive use, the general change in market conditions and the competitive situation in the Union market.
Det er værd at nævne, at ovennævnte parter ikke var i stand til at dokumentere deres påstande og påvise, at andre faktorer end dumpingimport til lave priser fra de pågældende lande, brød årsagssammenhængen mellem den skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt, og dumpingimporten.
It is worth mentioning that the above parties were not able to substantiate their claims and to demonstrate that factors other than the low-priced dumped imports from the countries concerned were breaking the causal link between the injury suffered by the Union industry and the dumped imports.
Visse parter hævdede, at Kommissionen ikke foretog en analyse af de mulige virkninger af salg af forgrenet FOH for EU-erhvervsgrenens salg af den pågældende vare og virkningerne for dens økonomiske situation.
Some parties claimed that the Commission did not analyse the possible impact the sales of branched FOH had on the sales of the product concerned made by the Union industry and the effects it had on its economic situation.
Undersøgelsen fokuserede på varen som defineret i betragtning 8-12, og ingen af parterne forelagde pålidelige oplysninger, der ville have gjort det muligt at vurdere de mulige negative virkninger, som forgrenet FOH har haft for EU-erhvervsgrenens økonomiske situation.
The investigation focused on the product as defined in recitals 8 to 12 and no party provided reliable data which would have allowed to assess the possible negative impact the branched FOH had on the economic situation of the Union industry.
Derfor afvises denne påstand.
Hence this claim is rejected.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende virkningerne af andre faktorer, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 99-106 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any comments regarding effects of other factors, recitals 99 to 106 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Undersøgelsen tydede ikke på, at der var andre faktorer end dumpingimporten til lave priser fra de pågældende lande, som brød årsagssammenhængen mellem den væsentlige skade, som EU-erhvervsgrenen har lidt, og dumpingimporten.
The investigation did not point to the fact that there were factors other than the low-priced dumped imports from the countries concerned which were breaking the causal link between the material injury suffered by the Union industry and the dumped imports.
Da der ikke er fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende årsagssammenhæng, bekræftes betragtning 107-110 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any comments regarding conclusion on causation, recitals 107 to 110 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende Unionens interesser, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 112 og 113 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the interest of the Union industry, recitals 112 and 113 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke blev fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende importører, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 115 og 116 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of comments on the interest of importers, recitals 115 and 116 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Der mindes om, at for at vurdere de eventuelle virkninger af antidumpingforanstaltningerne for EU-brugerne fokuseredes der i undersøgelsen på de aggregerede oplysninger fra fem store brugervirksomheder, som blev besøgt i den foreløbige fase.
It is recalled that in order to assess the possible impact of the anti-dumping measures on the Union users the investigation concentrated mainly on the aggregated data provided by five large user companies visited at provisional stage.
På dette grundlag blev det foreløbigt konstateret, at den pågældende vares andel af de samlede produktionsomkostninger var betydelig for denne koncern og lå på mellem 10 % og 20 % alt afhængigt af det endelige produkt.
On that basis it was provisionally found that the share of the cost of the product concerned in the total cost of production for this group was significant and ranged between 10 % and 20 % depending on the final product.
De foreliggende oplysninger blev dog revideret, og ifølge nye beregninger og korrektionen af visse tal var spændet på mellem 15 % og 25 %.
However, the data available was revised and according to new calculations and the correction of some figures, this range is found to be between 15 % and 25 %.