natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I forbindelse med beregningen af den normale værdi, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 3, bygger salgs-, general- og administrationsomkostninger og fortjeneste på de faktiske beløb, som påløber hos den eksporterende producent, som undersøgelsen vedrører, i forbindelse med produktion og salg i normal handel af samme vare, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 6.
When constructing normal value pursuant to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, the amounts for selling, general and administrative costs and for profits have been based, pursuant to Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation, on the actual data pertaining to the production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product, by the exporting producer under investigation.
Da der ikke er modtaget andre bemærkninger end dem, der er nævnt i betragtning 20 og 21, bekræftes den metode, der er beskrevet i betragtning 39 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any comments other than those already mentioned in the above recitals 20 and 21, the methodology explained in recital 39 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Da der ikke er modtaget andre bemærkninger end dem, der er nævnt i betragtning 20 og 21, bekræftes den metode, der er beskrevet i betragtning 40 og 41 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any comments other than those already mentioned in the above recitals 20 and 21, the methodology explained in recitals 40 to 41 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Da der ikke er modtaget andre bemærkninger end dem, der er nævnt i betragtning 20 og 21, bekræftes den metode, der er beskrevet i betragtning 42 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any comments other than those already mentioned in the above recitals 20 and 21, the methodology explained in recital 42 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Den endelige dumpingmargen for den eneste eksporterende producent i De Forenede Arabiske Emirater, JBF RAK LLC, udtrykt i procent af cif-prisen, Unionens grænse, ufortoldet, er fastsat til 0,6 %, dvs. under bagatelgrænsen, jf. grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 3.
The definitive dumping margin for the sole UAE exporting producer, JBF RAK LLC, expressed as a percentage of the cif Union frontier price, duty unpaid, is 0,6 %, i.e. below de minimis in the sense of Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation.
Da der ikke er andre producenter af den pågældende vare i De Forenede Arabiske Emirater, bør der ikke indføres endelige foranstaltninger.
Since there are no other producers of the product concerned in the UAE, no definitive measures should be imposed.
EU-produktionen, EU-erhvervsgrenen og EU-forbruget
Union production, Union industry and Union consumption
Der er ikke modtaget bemærkninger vedrørende EU-produktionen, EU-erhvervsgrenen og EU-forbruget.
No comments have been received with regard to Union production, Union industry and Union consumption.
Hermed bekræftes betragtning 45-50 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Consequently, the recitals 45 to 50 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Det skal gentages, at det i betragtning 52 i forordningen om midlertidig told blev konstateret, at dumpingmargenen for Pakistan var under bagatelgrænsen, hvorfor virkningerne af denne import ikke kunne vurderes sammen med den konstaterede dumpingimport fra Iran og De Forende Arabiske Emirater.
It is reiterated that in recital 52 of the provisional Regulation, it was considered that as the dumping margin found for Pakistan was de minimis, the effect of those imports could not be assessed together with imports provisionally found to be dumped from Iran and the UAE.
Da den videre undersøgelse viste, at dumpingmargenen for De Forenede Arabiske Emirater ligeledes er under bagatelgrænsen, anses det, at virkningerne af denne import ikke kan vurderes sammen med dumpingimporten fra Iran.
Given that the further investigation showed that the dumping margin for the UAE is also de minimis, it is considered that the effect of those imports cannot be assessed together with dumped imports from Iran.
Derfor foretages der ingen kumulativ vurdering af importen.
Consequently, no cumulative assessment of the imports is made.
Den pågældende imports mængde
Volume of the imports concerned
Mængdemæssigt lå dumpingimporten af den pågældende vare til EU på et relativt lavt niveau i 2006, hvorefter den steg gradvist frem til UP og nåede op på 55500 ton i UP.
The volume of dumped imports of the product concerned into the EU started from a relatively low level in 2006, but increased gradually until the IP, reaching 55500 tonnes in the IP.
Nærmere bestemt mere end fordobledes importen fra Iran mellem 2006 og 2007 for herefter at stige yderligere med over 100 procentpoint i 2008 sammenholdt med 2007 og med yderligere næsten 130 procentpoint mellem 2008 og UP.
More specifically, imports from Iran more than doubled between 2006 and 2007, before further increasing by over 100 percentage points in 2008 compared to 2007 and almost another 130 percentage points between 2008 and the IP.
Dumpingimportmængde fra Iran (ton)
Volume of dumped imports from Iran (tonnes)
Indeks (2006 = 100)
Index (2006 = 100)
Markedsandelen for dumpingimporten fra Iran
Market share of dumped imports from Iran
Markedsandelen for dumpingimporten fra Iran var på 0,4 % i 2006 og voksede støt med 1,5 procentpoint i den betragtede periode.
The market share held by dumped imports from Iran stood at 0,4 % during 2006 and increased steadily by 1,5 percentage points throughout the period considered.
Mere specifikt steg den med 0,5 procentpoint mellem 2006 og 2007, med yderligere 0,5 procentpoint mellem 2007 og 2008 og med 0,5 procentpoint mellem 2008 og UP.
More specifically, it rose by 0,5 percentage points between 2006 and 2007, by further 0,5 percentage points between 2007 and 2008 and by 0,5 percentage points between 2008 and the IP.
I løbet af UP var markedsandelen for dumpingimporten fra Iran på 1,9 %.
In the IP, the market share of dumped imports from Iran was 1,9 %.
Den gennemsnitlige importpris faldt med 11 % i den betragtede periode, og det mest markante fald indtraf mellem 2008 og UP.
The average import price decreased by 11 % in the period considered with the sharpest decline between 2008 and the IP.
Mere specifikt forblev gennemsnitsprisen stabil i 2007 og faldt med 2 procentpoint 2008, hvorefter den faldt med yderligere 9 procentpoint i UP.
More specifically, the average price remained stable in 2007 and decreased by 2 percentage points in 2008, before dropping by further 9 percentage points in the IP.
Pris på importen fra Iran (EUR/ton)
Price of imports from the Iran (EUR/tonne)
Efter den foreløbige fremlæggelse bemærkede den iranske eksportør, at dens skadesmargen var overvurderet, eftersom den fastsatte vejede gennemsnitlige enhedssalgspris var undervurderet, fordi beløbet til justering for forskelle i handelsled ikke var beregnet korrekt. Der blev dog ikke foreslået nogen alternativ kvantificering af justeringen for forskelle i handelsled.
Following the provisional disclosure, the Iranian exporter commented that its injury margin was overstated since the weighted average unit sales price established was understated, incorrectly calculating the amount of level of trade adjustment; however, no alternative quantification of the level of trade adjustment was proposed.
Den foreløbige beregning af forskelle i handelsled beregnes på basis af et fast beløb pr. ton, nemlig den provision, som den samarbejdsvillige importagent forlangte, svarende til ca. 1 % af den gennemsnitlige cif-pris.
Indeed, the basis for the level of trade used for the provisional calculation was a fixed amount per tonne that is a commission charged by the cooperating importing agent and represent around 1 % of the average cif price.
Der foreligger ikke andre oplysninger til brug for en sådan justering, og påstanden blev derfor afvist.
No other information is available for such adjustment and the claim is thus rejected.
Den samme part påstod også, at den for omkostninger efter import fastsatte sats på 2 % forekom undervurderet.
The same party also claimed that the 2 % rate taken for post-importation costs appeared to be understated.
I den forbindelse skal det endnu engang påpeges, at ingen importører samarbejdede i forbindelse med denne undersøgelse, og at det derfor ikke var muligt at verificere de faktiske omkostninger efter import.
It is reiterated in this regard that no importer cooperated in this investigation and it was not possible to verify the actual post-importation cost.
Da der ikke forelå andre oplysninger, gjorde man brug af den i forbindelse med tidligere procedurer anvendte sats.
Thus, in absence of any other information available, the rate used in previous proceedings was applied.
Det bekræftes derfor endeligt, at EU-erhvervsgrenens priser blev underbudt med 3,2 % ved salg i Unionen af dumpingvarer med oprindelse i Iran.
Given the above, it is definitively confirmed that the dumped products originating in Iran sold in the Union undercut the prices of the Union industry by 3,2 %.
EU-erhvervsgrenens situation
Situation of the Union industry
Nogle af de interesserede parter hævdede, at der ikke var forvoldt nogen skade, da stikprøven var forkert udtaget og resultaterne derfor ikke kunne ekstrapoleres til hele EU-erhvervsgrenen.
Some interested parties claimed that injury did not exist as given the alleged wrong sample no results could be extrapolated for the total Union industry.
Det blev eksempelvis påstået, at eftersom en enkelt virksomhed (der ikke indgik i stikprøven) havde oplyst, at den udnyttede sin kapacitet mere end 100 %, kunne der tydeligvis ikke være tale om skade.
As an example it was claimed that since one company (not in the sample) had indicated that it was using over 100 % of its capacity it would be a clear sign of no injury.
Det bemærkes, at den oplysning, der her henvises til, er taget fra den pågældende virksomheds indberetning til børsmyndighederne, og at den ikke er verificeret.
It is noted that the information submitted is an extract of this company’s submission to the stock exchange authorities and not verified.
Den stemmer i øvrigt ikke overens med de oplysninger, der foreligger i nærværende sag.
This information does not square with the information on the file.
Desuden kan en enkelt EU-producents kapacitetsudnyttelse under ingen omstændigheder ændre ved konklusionerne om skade vedrørende næsten alle andre skadesindikatorer for de EU-producenter, der indgik i stikprøven, og de øvrige EU-producenter.
Moreover, and in any event, the capacity utilisation of one EU producer alone cannot alter the findings of injury concerning almost all other injury indicators for the sampled EU producers and the other EU producers.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre påstande eller bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 63-82 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any other claims or comments, recitals 63 to 82 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat nogen specifikke bemærkninger, bekræftes konklusionen om skade i betragtning 83-85 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any specific comments, the conclusion on injury laid down in recitals 83 to 85 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Virkninger af dumpingimporten
Effect of the dumped imports
Stigningen i mængden af dumpingimport fra Iran, som næsten femdobledes mellem 2006 og UP, og forøgelsen af den tilsvarende markedsandel på EU-markedet, nemlig med omkring 1,5 procentpoint, og det konstaterede underbud (3,2 % i UP) faldt overvejende sammen med forværringen af EU-erhvervsgrenens økonomiske situation.
The increase in the volume of the dumped imports from Iran by almost five times between 2006 and the IP, and of its corresponding share of the Union market, i.e. by 1,5 percentage points, as well as the undercutting found (3,2 % during the IP) generally coincided with the deterioration of the economic situation of the Union industry.
Derfor kan det konkluderes, at dumpingimporten fra Iran havde indvirkning på den skade, der er forvoldt EU-erhvervsgrenen.
Therefore, it can be concluded that dumped imports from Iran had an impact on the injury found to the Union industry.
Det er vigtigt at understrege, at det i den sideløbende antisubsidieprocedure blev konstateret, at den samlede subsidierede import fra Pakistan, De Forenede Arabiske Emirater og Iran forvolder EU-erhvervsgrenen skade.
It is important to stress that in the parallel anti-subsidy proceeding, the cumulated subsidised imports from Pakistan, the UAE and Iran were found to cause material injury to the Union industry.
Som følge af det betydelige omfang af importen fra Korea og Pakistan og de lave priser på denne import bekræftes det dog også, som nævnt i betragtning 94 og 96 i forordningen om midlertidig told, at denne import i et vist omfang bidrog til den skade, der var blevet påført EU-erhvervsgrenen.
On the other hand, given the considerable volumes and the low prices of imports from Korea and Pakistan, it is also confirmed, as stated in recitals 94 and 96 of the provisional Regulation, that those imports contributed to a certain extent to the injury suffered by the Union industry.
I forbindelse med denne procedure underbød den betydelige import fra De Forenede Arabiske Emirater (ca. 150000 ton) desuden EU-erhvervsgrenens priser.
Additionally, in this proceeding, considerable imports from the UAE (around 150000 t) were also undercutting the Union industry prices.
Samtidig tegnede den iranske import sig for en markedsandel på under 1 % i 2006 og i 2007, og i UP var den på ca. 2 %, svarende til 55000 ton.
At the same time, the market share of the Iranian imports was below 1 % in 2006 and in 2007 and in the IP it was only close to 2 %, corresponding to 55000 t.
Det skal også bemærkes, at det underbud, der konstateredes for den iranske producent, var lavere end for ikke-dumpet import fra De Forenede Arabiske Emirater.
It also has to be noted that the undercutting established for the Iranian producer was lower than in the case of non-dumped imports from the UAE.
Det kan konkluderes, at selv om ovennævnte analyse viste, at dumpingimport med oprindelse i Iran har haft negative følgevirkninger for EU-erhvervsgrenens situation, var disse følgevirkninger isoleret set ikke væsentlige, som fastsat i grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 6.
In conclusion, while the above analysis showed that dumped imports originating in Iran have had some negative impact on the situation of the Union industry, this impact, taken in isolation, did not exist to a degree that could be considered material as required by Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Undersøgelsen har vist, at den pågældende vare, importeret fra Pakistan og De Forenede Arabiske Emirater, ikke blev solgt til dumpingpriser.
The investigation has shown that imports of the product concerned from Pakistan and from the UAE were not sold at dumped prices.
Følgelig afsluttes proceduren vedrørende Pakistan og De Forenede Arabiske Emirater, uden at der er blevet indført foranstaltninger.
Consequently the proceeding with regard to Pakistan and the UAE shall be terminated without the imposition of measures.
Undersøgelsen har vist, at den pågældende vare blev importeret fra Iran til dumpingpriser, hvilket i et vist omfang bidrog til den skade, som EF-erhvervsgrenen har lidt.
The investigation has shown that imports of the product concerned from Iran were made at dumped prices and contributed to some extent to the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Som nævnt i betragtning 59 blev det imidlertid konstateret, at de negative følgevirkninger, som importen fra Iran har haft for EU-erhvervsgrenens situation, ikke var væsentlige.
However, as indicated in recital 59, it was established that the negative impact of the Iranian imports on the situation of the Union industry did not exist to a degree that would enable it to be classified as material.
Ud fra ovenstående, og eftersom der ikke er lidt væsentlig skade som følge af dumpingimporten med oprindelse i Iran, konkluderes det, at proceduren bør afsluttes uden indførelse af foranstaltninger, også vedrørende Iran.
In light of the above, considering the lack of material injury caused by the dumped imports originating in Iran, it is concluded that the proceeding should be terminated without the imposition of measures also with regard to Iran.
De beløb, der er stillet som sikkerhed i form af midlertidig antidumpingtold i henhold til forordning (EU) nr. 472/2010, frigives —
The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty imposed pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 472/2010 should be released,
Antidumpingproceduren vedrørende importen af polyethylenterephthalat med viskositetsindeks på 78 ml/g og derover ifølge ISO-standard 1628-5, som henhører under KN-kode 39076020 og med oprindelse i Iran, Pakistan og De Forenede Arabiske Emirater, afsluttes hermed.
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, currently falling within CN code 39076020 and originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates is hereby terminated.
Forordning (EU) nr. 472/2010 ophæves.
Regulation (EU) No 472/2010 is hereby repealed.
Beløb, der er stillet som sikkerhed i form af midlertidig antidumpingtold, der blev indført ved forordning (EU) nr. 472/2010 på importen af polyethylenterephthalat med viskositetsindeks på 78 ml/g og derover ifølge ISO-standard 1628-5, i øjeblikket henhørende under KN-kode 39076020 og med oprindelse i Iran og De Forenede Arabiske Emirater, frigives.
The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty imposed pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 472/2010 on imports of polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, currently falling within CN code 39076020 and originating in Iran and the United Arab Emirates shall be released.
Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 28. september 2010.
Done at Brussels, 28 September 2010.
EUT C 208 af 3.9.2009, s. 12.
OJ C 208, 3.9.2009, p. 12.
EUT L 134 af 1.6.2010, s. 4.
OJ L 134, 1.6.2010, p. 4.
EUT L 134 af 1.6.2010, s. 25.
OJ L 134, 1.6.2010, p. 25.
om anerkendelse af, at Japans retlige og tilsynsmæssige rammer er ækvivalente med kravene i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1060/2009 om kreditvurderingsbureauer
on the recognition of the legal and supervisory framework of Japan as equivalent to the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on credit rating agencies
(meddelt under nummer K(2010) 6418)
(notified under document C(2010) 6418)
under henvisning til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1060/2009 af 16. september 2009 om kreditvurderingsbureauer [1], særlig artikel 5, stk. 6, og
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies [1], and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,
Den 12. juni 2009 gav Kommissionen Det Europæiske Værdipapirtilsynsudvalg (CESR) et mandat og anmodede om teknisk rådgivning med hensyn til den tekniske evaluering af Japans retlige og tilsynsmæssige rammer vedrørende kreditvurderingsbureauer.
On 12 June 2009 the Commission granted a mandate to the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) requesting their technical advice with regard to the technical assessment of the legal and supervisory framework of Japan in respect of credit rating agencies.
I sin udtalelse af 21. maj 2010 foreslog CESR, at de japanske retlige og tilsynsmæssige rammer vedrørende kreditvurderingsbureauer betragtes som ækvivalente med forordningen.
In its advice delivered on 21 May 2010, CESR suggested that the Japanese legal and supervisory framework in respect of credit rating agencies be considered equivalent to the Regulation.
Ifølge artikel 5, stk. 6, andet afsnit, i forordning (EF) nr. 1060/2009 skal opfyldelsen af tre betingelser undersøges, for at et tredjelands retlige og tilsynsmæssige rammer kan anses for at være ækvivalente med forordning (EF) nr. 1060/2009.
Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 5(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009, the fulfilment of three conditions needs to be assessed in order to consider a third country legal and supervisory framework equivalent to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
I henhold til den første betingelse skal kreditvurderingsbureauer i det pågældende tredjeland være underlagt krav om godkendelse eller registrering og effektivt løbende tilsyn og håndhævelse.
According to the first condition, credit rating agencies in the third country must be subject to authorisation or registration and are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an ongoing basis.
De japanske retlige og tilsynsmæssige rammer for kreditvurderingsbureauer udgøres af The Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (akt nr. 25 af 1948), som er relateret til The Regulation of Credit Ratings Agencies, The Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Business (forordning nr. 52 af 2007), som er relateret til The Regulation of Credit Rating Agencies, The Cabinet Office Ordinance on Definitions under Article 2 of the and Exchange Act (finansministeriel forordning nr. 14 af 1993), som er relateret til The Regulation of Credit Rating Agencies, samt The Comprehensive Guidelines for Supervision of Financial Instruments Business Operators (tillæg) og The Guidelines for Supervision of Credit Rating Agencies.
The Japanese legal and supervisory framework for credit rating agencies consists of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No 25 of 1948) related to the Regulation of Credit Ratings Agencies; the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Business (Ordinance No 52 of 2007) related to the Regulation of Credit Rating Agencies; the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Definitions under Article 2 of the and Exchange Act (Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance No 14 of 1993) related to the Regulation of Credit Rating Agencies, as well as the Comprehensive Guidelines for Supervision of Financial Instruments Business Operators (Supplement) and the Guidelines for Supervision of Credit Rating Agencies.
I juni 2009 vedtog det japanske parlament (Diet) et nyt sæt lovgivningsmæssige bestemmelser for kreditvurderingsbureauer, som blev fulgt op af bekendtgørelser og forordninger fra regeringen i december 2009, der fremsætter retningslinjerne og betingelserne for disse rammer.
In June 2009, the Japanese Parliament (the Diet) passed legislation introducing a new regulatory framework for credit rating agencies, which was followed by the release in December 2009 of Cabinet Orders and Cabinet Office Ordinances laying out the details of the terms and conditions of this framework.
De retlige rammer, som trådte i kraft i april 2010, fremsætter, at et kreditvurderingsbureau skal registreres ved The Financial Services Agency of Japan (JFSA), for at dets kreditvurderinger kan bruges i reguleringsøjemed i Japan, og pålægger retligt bindende forpligtelser for kreditvurderingsbureauer og løbende tilsyn hermed.
The framework, which became effective in April 2010, requires a credit rating agency to be registered with the Financial Services Agency of Japan (JFSA) in order for its credit ratings to be used for regulatory purposes in Japan and imposes legally binding obligations on credit rating agencies and their supervision on an ongoing basis.
JFSA har en bred og omfattende række beføjelser og er i stand til at vedtage forskellige foranstaltninger, herunder sanktioner, over for kreditvurderingsbureauer for overtrædelse af bestemmelser fra The Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, som er relateret til The Regulation of Credit Ratings Agencies.
The JFSA is endowed with a wide and comprehensive range of powers and is able to take a number of measures, including sanctions, against credit rating agencies for breach of the provisions of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act related to the Regulation of Credit Ratings Agencies.