natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Endelig hævdede ansøgeren, at priserne på SWR afsendt fra Republikken Korea og Malaysia var dumpingpriser i forhold til den normale værdi, der var blevet fastsat for samme vare i den oprindelige undersøgelse.
Finally, the applicant alleged that the prices of SWR consigned from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia were dumped in relation to the normal value established for the like product during the original investigation.
Efter at have hørt det rådgivende udvalg fastslog Kommissionen, at der forelå tilstrækkelige umiddelbare beviser til at indlede en undersøgelse i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 13, og den iværksatte derfor ved forordning (EF) nr. 734/2009 [6] (»indledningsforordningen«) en undersøgelse.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation, the Commission initiated an investigation by Regulation (EC) No 734/2009 [6] (the ‘initiating Regulation’).
I henhold til grundforordningens artikel 13, stk. 3, og artikel 14, stk. 5, pålagde Kommissionen ved indledningsforordningen desuden toldmyndighederne at registrere importen af SWR afsendt fra Republikken Korea og Malaysia.
Pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission, by the initiating Regulation, also directed the customs authorities to register imports of SWR consigned from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia.
Kommissionen underrettede officielt myndighederne i Kina, Republikken Korea og Malaysia, producenter/eksportører og forhandlere i disse lande samt importører i Unionen, som den vidste var berørt af sagen, samt EU-erhvervsgrenen som ansøger om indledningen af undersøgelsen.
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia, the producers/exporters and the traders in those countries, as well as the importers in the Union known to be concerned and the applicant Union industry of the initiation of the investigation.
Der blev sendt spørgeskemaer til de producenter/eksportører i Kina, Republikken Korea og Malaysia, som Kommissionen kendte fra anmodningen eller gennem Republikken Koreas og Malaysias mission ved Den Europæiske Union, eller som gav sig selv til kende inden for de frister, der var fastsat i indledningsforordningens artikel 3, stk. 1.
Questionnaires were sent to the known producers/exporters in the PRC, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia known to the Commission from the request or through the Missions of the Republic of Korea and Malaysia to the European Union or which made themselves known within the deadlines specified in Article 3(1) of the initiating Regulation.
Der blev også sendt spørgeskemaer til forhandlere i Republikken Korea og Malaysia og til de importører i Unionen, der var nævnt i anmodningen.
Questionnaires were also sent to traders in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia and to the importers in the Union named in the request.
De interesserede parter fik mulighed for at give deres mening til kende skriftligt og anmode om at blive hørt mundtligt inden for den frist, der var fastsat i indledningsforordningen.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the initiating Regulation.
Femten producenter/eksportører og to forhandlere i Republikken Korea, to producenter/eksportører i Malaysia, fem producenter/eksportører i Kina, to forretningsmæssigt forbundne importører, ti ikke-forretningsmæssigt forbundne importører i Unionen og European Wire Rope Importers Association gav sig til kende.
Fifteen producers/exporters and two traders in the Republic of Korea, two producers/exporters in Malaysia, five producers/exporters in China, two related importers, ten unrelated importers in the Union and the European Wire Rope Importers Association made themselves known.
En række andre virksomheder hævdede, at de ikke er involveret i fremstilling eller eksport af den undersøgte vare.
Several other companies claimed that they are not involved in the production or export of the product under investigation.
Følgende virksomheder besvarede spørgeskemaet, og der blev efterfølgende aflagt kontrolbesøg hos dem:
The following companies submitted replies to the questionnaires and verification visits were subsequently carried out at their premises:
Producenter/eksportører i Republikken Korea:
Producers/exporters in the Republic of Korea:
Bosung Wire Rope Co., Ltd, Kimhae-Si
Bosung Wire Rope Co., Ltd, Kimhae-Si,
Chung Woo Rope Co., Ltd, Busan
Chung Woo Rope Co., Ltd, Busan,
Cosmo Wire Ltd, Ulsan
Cosmo Wire Ltd, Ulsan,
Dae Heung Industrial Co., Ltd, Haman — Gun
Dae Heung Industrial Co., Ltd, Haman – Gun,
DSR Wire Corp., Suncheon-City og dens forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomhed DSR Corp., Busan
DSR Wire Corp., Suncheon-City and its related company DSR Corp., Busan,
Goodwire Mfg., Co., Ltd, Yangsan-city
Goodwire Mfg., Co., Ltd, Yangsan-city,
Kiswire Ltd, Seoul
Kiswire Ltd, Seoul,
Line Metal Co., Ltd, Changnyoung-Gun
Line Metal Co., Ltd, Changnyoung-Gun,
Manho Rope & Wire Ltd, Busan
Manho Rope & Wire Ltd, Busan,
Shin Han Rope Co., Ltd, Incheon
Shin Han Rope Co., Ltd, Incheon,
Forhandler i Republikken Korea:
Trader in the Republic of Korea:
Trion Co Ltd, Busan
Trion Co. Ltd, Busan
Producenter/eksportører i Malaysia:
Producers/exporters in Malaysia:
Producenter/eksportører i Kina:
Producers/exporters in the PRC:
Kiswire Qingdao Ltd, Qingdao
Kiswire Qingdao Ltd, Qingdao,
Kiswire Europe, Nederlandene
Kiswire Europe, the Netherlands,
Verope AG, Schweiz.
Verope AG, Switzerland.
Undersøgelsesperioden dækkede perioden fra 1. juli 2008 til 30. juni 2009 (»UP«).
The investigation period covered the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009 (the ‘IP’).
Der blev indsamlet oplysninger for perioden fra 1999 til udgangen af UP med henblik på at undersøge den angivelige ændring i handelsmønstret.
Data was collected for the period from 1999 up to the end of the IP to investigate the alleged change in the pattern of trade.
I overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 13, stk. 1, blev vurderingen af, om der forekom omgåelse, foretaget ved at analysere, om der var sket en ændring i mønstret for handelen mellem tredjelande og Unionen, om denne ændring skyldtes en praksis, forarbejdning eller bearbejdning, for hvilken der ikke forelå nogen tilstrækkelig gyldig grund eller økonomisk begrundelse ud over indførelsen af tolden, om der forelå beviser for skade eller for, at virkningerne af tolden undergraves i henseende til priserne på og/eller mængderne af samme vare, og om der var bevis for dumping i forhold til de tidligere fastslåede normale værdier for samme vare, om fornødent i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i grundforordningens artikel 2.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the assessment of the existence of circumvention was made by analysing successively whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between third countries and the Union, if this change stemmed from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty, if there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the like product, and whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the like product, if necessary in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
Den pågældende vare og samme vare
Product concerned and the like product
Den pågældende vare, som fastlagt i den oprindelige undersøgelse, er tovværk og kabler af stål, herunder lukkede tove, undtagen tovværk og kabler af rustfrit stål, med største tværmål over 3 mm (af erhvervsgrenen ofte betegnet SWR), med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina, i øjeblikket henhørende under KN-kode ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 og ex73121098 (»den pågældende vare«).
The product concerned is, as defined in the original investigation, steel ropes and cables, including locked coil ropes, excluding ropes and cables of stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm (in industry terminology often referred to as SWR), originating in the People’s Republic of China, currently falling within CN codes ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 and ex73121098 (the product concerned).
Den vare, der er genstand for undersøgelsen, er tovværk og kabler af stål, herunder lukkede tove, undtagen tovværk og kabler af rustfrit stål, med største tværmål over 3 mm, afsendt fra Republikken Korea og Malaysia, uanset om varen er angivet med oprindelse i Republikken Korea og Malaysia eller ej (»den undersøgte vare«), i øjeblikket henhørende under de samme KN-koder som den pågældende vare.
The product under investigation is steel ropes and cables including locked coil ropes, excluding ropes and cables of stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm, consigned from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia or not (the product under investigation), currently falling within the same CN codes as the product concerned.
Det fremgik af undersøgelsen, at de SWR, der blev eksporteret til Unionen fra Kina, og de SWR, der blev afsendt fra Republikken Korea og Malaysia til Unionen, har samme grundlæggende fysiske og tekniske egenskaber og samme anvendelsesformål, og de bør derfor anses for at være samme vare, jf. grundforordningens artikel 1, stk. 4.
The investigation showed that the SWR exported to the Union from the PRC and those consigned from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia to the Union have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same uses, and are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Samarbejdsvilje og handelsmængde
Degree of cooperation and determination of the trade volumes
Som nævnt i betragtning 11 var der 14 eksportører/producenter i Republikken Korea, en koreansk forhandler, to eksporterende producenter i Malaysia og tre eksporterende producenter i Kina, som samarbejdede ved at indsende spørgeskemabesvarelser.
As stated above in recital 11, fourteen exporters/producers in the Republic of Korea, one Korean trader, two exporting producers in Malaysia and three exporting producers in China cooperated by submitting questionnaire replies.
En koreansk virksomhed underrettede efter at have indsendt sin spørgeskemabesvarelse Kommissionen om, at den var gået konkurs, og at den derfor trak sig ud af samarbejdet.
After the submission of its questionnaire reply, one Korean company notified the Commission that it went bankrupt and therefore it withdrew its cooperation.
I forbindelse med en anden koreansk virksomhed fandtes anvendelse af artikel 18, stk. 1, at være berettiget af de i betragtning 47 anførte grunde.
In the case of another Korean company the application of Article 18(1) was found to be warranted for the reasons set out in recital 47.
De samarbejdsvillige koreanske eksporterende producenter dækkede 81 % af den samlede koreanske eksport til Unionen i UP, jf. Comext.
The cooperating Korean exporting producers covered 81 % of the total Korean exports to the Union in the IP as reported in Comext.
Så selv om samarbejdsviljen var stor, dækkede de samarbejdsvillige producenter/eksportører ikke helt den samlede eksportmængde af SWR fra Republikken Korea.
Therefore, even though cooperation was high, the cooperating producers/exporters did not completely cover the overall export volume of SWR from the Republic of Korea.
De samlede eksportmængder blev derfor baseret på Comext.
The overall export volumes were thus based on Comext.
Der er to kendte producenter i Malaysia.
There are two known producers in Malaysia.
De samlede eksportmængder for de to samarbejdsvillige virksomheder i Malaysia oversteg importmængden af den undersøgte vare, jf. Comext.
The total export quantities of the two cooperating companies in Malaysia exceeded the import volume of the product under investigation recorded in Comext.
Derfor ansås de eksporterende producenter for at afspejle den samlede eksport af SWR fra Malaysia til Unionen.
Therefore the exporting producers were considered to be reflecting the total exports of SWR from Malaysia to the Union.
Ansøgeren hævdede, at Comext-data er upålidelige, og at de samlede eksportmængder fra Malaysia til Unionen ikke burde fastslås på dette grundlag.
The applicant claimed that Comext data were unreliable and therefore total export volumes from Malaysia to the Union should not be determined on this basis.
Men i forbindelse med undersøgelsen blev importdata krydstjekket med officielle malaysiske statistikker og med de efterprøvede spørgeskemabesvarelser.
However, during the investigation, import data were counter checked with Malaysian official statistics and with the verified questionnaire replies.
Undersøgelsen viste ikke, at den faktiske eksport fra Malaysia oversteg den import, som de samarbejdsvillige malaysiske virksomheder havde indberettet.
This analysis did not reveal that actual exports from Malaysia exceeded the exports reported by the cooperating Malaysian companies.
Derfor måtte ansøgerens påstand afvises.
The applicant’s argument had therefore to be rejected.
Samarbejdsviljen blandt producenter/eksportører i Kina var lille, og der var kun tre eksportører/producenter, som indsendte en spørgeskemabesvarelse.
There was a low level of cooperation by producers/exporters in the PRC, with only three exporters/producers submitting a questionnaire reply.
Endvidere var der ingen af disse virksomheder, som eksporterede den pågældende vare til Unionen og kun i meget små mængder til Malaysia.
Moreover, none of those companies exported the product concerned to the Union and only in very minor quantities to Malaysia.
Eksporten fra de samarbejdsvillige virksomheder dækkede 41 % af den samlede kinesiske eksport til Republikken Korea.
The exports of the cooperating companies covered 41 % of the total Chinese exports to the Republic of Korea.
Der kunne derfor ikke på grundlag af de oplysninger, som de samarbejdsvillige parter fremkom med, foretages nogen rimelig vurdering af størrelsen af eksporten af SWR fra Kina.
Therefore, on the basis of the information submitted by the cooperating parties no reasonable determination could be made as to export volumes of SWR from the PRC.
I betragtning af ovenstående måtte konklusionerne vedrørende importen af SWR til Unionen og eksporten af SWR fra Kina til Republikken Korea og Malaysia delvist baseres på de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger, jf. grundforordningens artikel 18.
Given the above, findings in respect of imports of SWR into the Union and exports of SWR from the PRC to the Republic of Korea and Malaysia had to be made partially on the basis of facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Der blev benyttet Comext-data til at fastslå den samlede importmængde fra Kina til Unionen.
Comext data was used to determine overall import volumes from the PRC to the Union.
Der blev benyttet kinesiske, koreanske og malaysiske nationale statistikker til at fastslå den samlede import til Republikken Korea og Malaysia fra Kina.
Chinese, Korean and Malaysian national statistics were used for the determination of the overall imports to the Republic of Korea and Malaysia from the PRC.
Dataene blev krydstjekket de forskellige statistiske kilder imellem og bekræftet af andre statistiske databaser som f.eks. Global Trade Atlas, China Export Database og data fra toldmyndighederne i Republikken Korea og Malaysia.
Data were cross-checked among the different statistical sources and confirmed by other statistical databases such as the Global Trade Atlas, China Export Database and the data provided by the customs authorities of the Republic of Korea and Malaysia.
Den importmængde, der er registreret i koreanske, malaysiske og kinesiske statistikker, dækkede en større varegruppe end den pågældende vare eller den undersøgte vare.
The import volume recorded in Korean, Malaysian and Chinese statistics covered a larger product group than the product concerned or the product under investigation.
Derfor blev statistikkerne justeret tilsvarende ud fra konklusionerne i denne undersøgelse.
Therefore, the statistics were adjusted accordingly based on the findings of the present investigation.
Importen af SWR til Unionen
Imports of SWR into the Union
På den anden side er den samlede import af SWR fra Korea til Unionen vokset betydeligt mellem 1999 og 2008 fra omkring 11123 tons til 48214 tons.
On the other hand, total imports of Korean SWR to the Union have increased significantly between 1999 and 2008 from approximately 11123 tonnes to 48214 tonnes.
Den årlige forøgelse i absolutte tal var mest markant i årene 2002 og 2003 samt i de senere år i 2006 og 2007.
The yearly increase in absolute terms was the most significant in the years 2002 and 2003 and more recently in 2006 and 2007.
Ud fra oplysninger i klagen og fra Republikken Koreas mission ved Den Europæiske Union anses den nuværende undersøgelse for at have dækket langt størstedelen af de egentlige producenter i Korea af den undersøgte vare, hvis ikke alle.
Based on information in the complaint and that provided by the Mission of the Republic of Korea to the European Union, the present investigation is considered to have covered the vast majority, if not all, of the genuine producers of the product under investigation in Korea.
Derfor var det opfattelsen, at ikke-samarbejdsvillige koreanske virksomheders eksport til Unionen, som udgjorde omkring 19 % af den samlede eksportmængde fra Republikken Korea, hovedsagelig eksporteres af forhandlere, bortset fra de i betragtning 18 og 47 nævnte producenter.
Therefore it was considered that the exports by non-cooperating Korean companies to the Union, which represented approximately 19 % of the total exports in terms of quantity from the Republic of Korea, are, apart from the producers mentioned in recitals 18 and 47, mainly exported by traders.
Eksporten fra ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder er dalet fra 2008, hvilket skal ses i lyset af de koreanske myndigheders undersøgelse i denne periode, jf. betragtning 52.
Exports of the non-cooperating companies have been diminishing as from 2008 which is to be seen in light of the investigation of the Korean authorities in this period as described in recital 52.
For så vidt angår Malaysia, viser både Comext-data og de samarbejdsvillige virksomheders samlede eksport, at eksporten fra Malaysia til Unionen også tidligere har været støt stigende.
As far as Malaysia is concerned, both Comext data and the total export of the cooperating companies show that exports from Malaysia to the Union have also been continuously increasing in the past.
Stigningen var størst og mest støt mellem 2005 og UP, hvor Malaysias eksport til Unionen fordobledes.
The increase was the most significant and steady between 2005 and the IP when Malaysian exports to the Union doubled.
Tabel 1 viser importmængder af SWR fra ovennævnte lande til Unionen efter indførelsen af foranstaltningerne i 1999 og frem til UP.
Table 1 shows import quantities of SWR from the abovementioned countries into the Union since the imposition of the measures in 1999 until the IP:
Udviklingen i importen af SWR til Unionen siden indførelsen af foranstaltningerne
Evolution of imports of SWR to the Union since the imposition of the measures
Kilde: Comext, koreanske statistikker (KITA).
Source: Comext, Korean statistics (KITA)
Importmængde i tons
Import volumes given in tonnes
Andel af samlet import
Share of total imports
Ikke-samarbejdsvillige koreanske virksomheder
Korean non-cooperating companies
Malaysiske samarbejdsvillige virksomheder (indeks, 2006 = 100)
Malaysian cooperating companies (index, 2006 = 100)
Hvis man iagttager mønstret i ovennævnte tre handelsstrømme, bemærker man, at navnlig siden 2005 har koreanske eksportører og delvis malaysiske eksportører ligget betydeligt over og i et vist omfang erstattet kinesiske eksportører på EU-markedet mængdemæssigt.
Looking at the pattern of the above three trade flows, it can be observed that particularly since 2005, Korean exporters and partly Malaysian exporters have significantly outsold and to some extent replaced Chinese exporters on the Union market in terms of volume.
På grund af den globale økonomiske afmatning, der falder sammen med UP, er handelsmængderne af SWR dalet, eller stigningen er taget af i alle de berørte lande.
Due to the global economic slowdown which coincides with the IP, traded volumes of SWR have decreased or the increase has slowed down between all countries concerned.
Faldet var dog mest markant for import fra Kina til Unionen (-27 %).
The decrease was however the most significant in the case of imports from the PRC to the Union (– 27 %).
Kinesisk eksport til Republikken Korea og Malaysia
Chinese exports to the Republic of Korea and Malaysia
Import af kinesiske varer til Republikken Korea mellem 1999 og UP
Import of Chinese products into the Republic of Korea between 1999 and the IP
Kilde: Koreanske statistikker (KITA), data fra de koreanske toldmyndigheder, efterprøvede oplysninger fra de samarbejdsvillige producenter.
Source: Korean statistics (KITA), data provided by the Korean Customs Services, verified information provided by the cooperating producers
Import (tons, alle diametre)
Import (tonnes, all diameters)
Ændring fra foregående år
Yearly change (%)
Ikke-samarbejdsvillige koreanske virksomheders import (tons, udelukkende den pågældende vare)
Imports by Korean non-cooperating companies (tonnes, product concerned only)
For at fastslå tendensen i handelsstrømmen af SWR fra Kina til Malaysia blev både statistikker fra Malaysia og Kina inddraget.
To establish the trend of the China to Malaysia trade flow of SWR, both Malaysian and Chinese statistics were considered.
Disse data er i begge tilfælde kun tilgængelige på niveauet for en højere varegruppe end den pågældende vare.
Both of these data are only available at a higher product group level than the product concerned.
Endvidere udviste de betydelige forskelle.
Furthermore they showed considerable differences.
Derfor kunne der ikke opstilles pålidelige data.
Therefore, no reliable data could be established in this regard.
Ansøgeren hævdede, at det forhold, at der ikke kunne opstilles pålidelige data, ikke var tilstrækkeligt til at konkludere, at der ikke foregik omgåelse.
The applicant claimed that the fact that no reliable data could be established would not be sufficient to conclude that no circumvention took place.
Dokumentationen i forbindelse med den nuværende undersøgelse, dvs. navnlig de samarbejdsvillige malaysiske eksporterende producenters produktionsmængde samt deres eksportsalg til Unionen, viste, at eksporten af SWR fra Malaysia var af egentlig malaysisk oprindelse og derfor ikke udgjorde omgåelse, jf. betragtning 38 og 55.
As outlined in recitals 38 and 55, the evidence available in the current investigation, i.e. in particular production volume of the cooperating Malaysian exporting producers as well as their export sales to the Union showed that exports of SWR from Malaysia were of genuine Malaysian origin and therefore did not constitute circumvention.
I dette tilfælde var det derfor irrelevant, om der var import fra Kina til Malaysia eller ej.
In this case, it was therefore irrelevant whether or not there were imports from China to Malaysia.
Ansøgerens påstand blev derfor afvist.
The applicant’s claim was therefore rejected.
Produktionsmængder i Republikken Korea og Malaysia
Production volumes in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia
Udviklingen i Republikken Koreas samarbejdsvillige producenters samlede produktionsmængde forblev stabil mellem 2006 og UP.
The evolution of the total production volume of cooperating producers in the Republic of Korea had remained stable between 2006 and the IP.
Malaysiske producenter øgede imidlertid deres produktionsmængde betydeligt i samme periode.
Malaysian producers however have considerably increased their output during the same period.