natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Selv om undersøgelsen har bekræftet, at forbrugerne er gået en anelse væk fra den pågældende vare — på grundlag af et beskedent fald i forbruget af lædersko, som blev observeret i den betragtede periode og den øgede efterspørgsel efter tekstilsko — kan dette dog tilskrives ændrede modetendenser snarere end et begrænset udvalg af lædersko.
Even if the investigation has confirmed that the choice of consumers has slightly shifted away from the product in question, given the modest decrease of consumption of leather shoes observed during the period considered and the increased demand for textile shoes, this can however be attributed to changing fashion trends rather than to a reduced choice of leather footwear.
KONKLUSION VEDRØRENDE UNIONENS INTERESSER
CONCLUSION ON UNION INTEREST
Af ovenstående fremgår det, at en væsentlig del af producenterne i EU-erhvervsgrenen har forbedret deres situation efter indførelsen af antidumpingforanstaltningerne og har bevist deres levedygtighed ved at tilpasse deres forretningsmodeller til udfordringerne på det globale marked.
It follows from the above that a significant part of the Union industry producers has improved its situation since the imposition of anti-dumping measures and has proven its viability by adapting their business models to the challenges of the globalised market.
Hvis foranstaltningerne opretholdes, vil de give mere tid til at videreføre denne proces.
Should measures be maintained, they will allow for more time to continue this process.
Hvis foranstaltningerne udløber, vil pristrykket fra dumpingimporten i det mellemste og laveste segment sandsynligvis også indvirke på de dyrere varer og dermed påvirke alle former for læderfodtøj.
Should measures lapse, the price pressure of the dumped imports on the mid to low end products will likely impact also on the higher end products and eventually affect all leather footwear.
Med dette scenario er det sandsynligt, at flere EU-producenter vil gå konkurs, da disse overvejende små og mellemstore virksomheder er økonomisk mere følsomme.
In this scenario, it is likely that more Union producers will go into bankruptcy given that due to their predominant small to medium size, they are financially more vulnerable.
På den anden side var følgevirkninger af antidumpingtolden fra 2006 til UP for importører, detailhandlere/distributører og forbrugere ikke uforholdsmæssige.
On the other hand, the impact of the anti-dumping duties from 2006 until the RIP on importers, retailers/distributors and consumers was not disproportionate.
Hvis foranstaltningerne opretholdes og det antages, at forbrugernes efterspørgsel fortsat svækkes i kølvandet på den økonomiske krise, vil antidumpingtoldens følgevirkninger for alle aktører sandsynligvis blive større end tidligere.
Should measures continue and assuming that consumer demand will further weaken in the wake of the economic crisis, the impact of the anti-dumping duties on all players will in all likelihood be higher than in the past.
Grundet den generelle sunde økonomi og beviste fleksibilitet blandt importørerne og detailhandlernes/distributørernes generelt stærke markedsposition, der i høj grad gør det muligt at diversificere deres produktmiks, kan det antages, at disse erhvervsdrivende ikke vil påføres uforholdsmæssig stor skade på kort og mellemlang sigt.
However, given the generally healthy state and proven flexibility of the importers and the general strong market position of retailers/distributors that can diversify their product mix considerably, it can be assumed that those operators will not disproportionately suffer in the short to medium term.
Hvad angår forbrugerne, skete der ingen bemærkelsesværdige prisstigninger i tiden efter indførelsen af antidumpingtolden, og hvis der tages hensyn til resultaterne af analysen for tiden efter UP, tyder intet på, at forbrugerpriserne vil stige uforholdsmæssigt i fremtiden.
As regards consumers, there was no noticeable price-increase following the imposition of the anti-dumping duties and, also taking into account the results of the post-RIP analysis, there are no indications that consumer prices will increase disproportionately in the future.
Det konkluderes, at undersøgelsen ikke afdækkede nogen tvingende grunde til ikke at opretholde antidumpingforanstaltningerne.
To conclude, the review investigation did not bring to light any compelling reasons why the anti-dumping measures should not be maintained.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de endelige resultater hævdede en af de interesserede parter, at det ikke var antidumpingforanstaltningerne, som havde hjulpet EU-erhvervsgrenen, men derimod udelukkende omstruktureringsindsatsen.
After disclosure of the definitive findings, one interested party claimed that it were not the anti-dumping measures that helped the Union industry, but the restructuring efforts only.
Ikke alene var der ingen yderligere dokumentation for denne påstand, der blev heller ikke taget hensyn til de objektive resultater af denne fornyede undersøgelse.
This claim was not only without further substantiation, but it also ignores the objective findings of this review investigation.
Navnlig tages der ikke hensyn til det tidsmæssige sammenfald mellem indførelsen af antidumpingforanstaltninger og EU-erhvervsgrenens stabiliseringsproces.
Notably, it ignores the coincidence in time between the imposition of the anti-dumping measures and the stabilisation process of the Union industry.
Efter indførelsen af foranstaltningerne stoppede den kraftige stigning i billig dumpingimport rent faktisk, og den kombinerede imports markedsandel faldt fra 35,5 % til 28,7 %.
Indeed, since the imposition of the measures, the massive increase of low priced, dumped imports stopped and combined imports fell from a market share of 35,5 % to 28,7 %.
Dette fald i dumpingimporten på markedet i Unionen mindskede prispresset fra dette billige fodtøj og bidrog til, at EU-erhvervsgrenen kunne fortsætte sin omstruktureringsindsats.
This decrease of dumped imports on the Union market alleviated the price pressure exerted by those low priced footwear and helped the Union industry to continue with its restructuring efforts.
Det blev også gentaget, at Unionen ikke kan masseproducere og således opnå de stordriftsfordele, som gør det muligt at imødekomme den store efterspørgsel efter billigere sko i Unionen.
It was also reiterated that the Union cannot mass produce and due to the consequent missing economies of scale it would not be able to satisfy the strong demand in the Union of cheaper shoes.
For det første skal det påpeges, at der ikke blev fremlagt dokumentation for denne påstand.
Firstly, it is pointed out that this claim was not substantiated.
For det andet findes der også blandt EU-producenterne en række større producenter af sko i det laveste segment med de laveste priser, og nogle af disse er blevet analyseret i forbindelse med stikprøven.
Secondly, amongst the Union producers, there are also a number of bigger producers of lower segment shoes with lower sales prices, some of them having been analysed in the sample.
Hvad angår påstanden om, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke vil kunne levere de ønskede mængder, skal det desuden bemærkes, at undersøgelsen viste, at de fleste af de større importører, der blev udvalgt til stikprøven, ikke udelukkende bestiller hos en enkelt leverandør, men også køber relativt små mængder hos en række forskellige leverandører.
Moreover, with regard to the claim that the Union industry would not be in a position to deliver the required volumes, it is noted that the investigation showed that most of the larger importers selected in the sample do not only order from one single supplier, but also source relatively smaller volumes from several suppliers.
Sammen med virkningerne af den i afsnit E.2 omhandlede »klyngemodel«, som indebærer, at en række mindre virksomheders arbejdsstyrker kombineres, bør dette logisk set også sætte EU-erhvervsgrenen i stand til at fremstille større mængder.
This, together with the effects of the ‘clustering model’ as set out in section E.2., whereby work forces of several smaller companies are combined, should logically also enable the Union industry to produce bigger volumes.
To af de interesserede parter hævdede, at situationen med EU-producenter, der foretager global udlicitering, ikke var genstand for en lige så detaljeret analyse, som det var tilfældet for EU-producenterne i stikprøven.
Two interested parties claimed that the situation of globally outsourcing Union producers was not analysed in the same detail as was done for the sampled Union producers.
Det skal dog bemærkes, at analysen omfattede en vurdering af alle interesserede parter, for så vidt at de samarbejdede i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
It is however noted that the analysis included an assessment of all interested parties to the extent that they cooperated in the investigation.
F.eks. blev interesserne hos en stor EU-producent, som blev udelukket fra definitionen af EU-erhvervsgrenen på grund af importmængderne — jf. betragtning 402 ff. — undersøgt ret nøje.
For example, the interest of a large Union producer who was excluded from the definition of the Union industry because of its import volumes, see recitals 402 et seqq, was examined in quite some detail.
Det bør også bemærkes, at virksomheder i Unionen, som har udliciteret størstedelen af deres produktion til tredjelande, teknisk set skal betragtes som importører i forbindelse med antidumpingundersøgelser, og importørernes situation er fuldt ud blevet taget i betragtning og analyseret i betragtning 409 ff.
It should also be noted that companies in the Union which have outsourced the majority of their production to third countries are to be technically considered in anti-dumping investigations as importers and the situation of importers has fully been taken into account and analysed in recitals 409 et seqq.
En af parterne påpegede, at der var blevet foretaget en forkert vurdering af interesserne hos de EU-producenter, der tidligere indgik i stikprøven, da nogle af dem angiveligt var imod opretholdelse af foranstaltningerne.
One party pointed out that there was a wrong assessment of the interests of formerly sampled Union producers as some of them were allegedly against the continuation of measures.
Dette er dog ikke korrekt, da selv den virksomhed, som ikke kunne se nogen fordel for sig selv, hævdede, at foranstaltninger bidrog til at begrænse dumpingimporten.
This is however not correct, as even the company that did not see the benefit for itself claimed that measures helped to curb dumped imports.
En anden virksomhed fremførte blot, at det under den økonomiske krise er vanskeligt at forudse de præcise, fremtidige virkninger af antidumpingtold, men denne virksomhed gav ikke udtryk for, at tolden ikke havde en berettigelse.
One other company only mentioned that it is difficult for them in the economic crisis to foresee the exact effect of anti-dumping duties in the future, but this company did not mention that the duties were without merit.
Selv de parter, som ikke eksplicit nævner, at de har direkte fordel af foranstaltningerne, har påpeget, at den indirekte fordel ved foranstaltningerne har været en begrænsning af importen fra Folkerepublikken Kina og Vietnam.
Thus, even the parties that did not explicitly mention that they directly benefited from measures have pointed out that measures have brought the indirect benefit of curbing imports from the PRC and Vietnam.
Det bekræftes derfor, at EU-producenterne overordnet set kunne drage fordel af foranstaltningerne og viste deres evne til at forbedre deres situation, efter at foranstaltningerne havde afbødet virkningerne af skadevoldende dumping.
It is therefore definitely confirmed that overall the Union producers benefited from the measures and showed their capacity to improve their situation once measures mitigated the effects of injurious dumping.
En lang række interesserede parter fremsatte en generel kritik af, at anonyme klageres interesser ville blive beskyttet, mens importørers, andre erhvervsdrivendes og forbrugernes interesser stort set ikke blev taget i betragtning.
Several interested parties criticised in general that the interests of anonymous complainants would be protected whereas the interests of importers, other economic operators as well as consumers would have been largely disregarded.
Det skal bemærkes, at indførelsen af antidumpingtold overordnet set blev betragtet som en fordel for EU-producenterne og ikke som et tiltag, der var urimeligt negativt for de øvrige, relevante erhvervsdrivende.
It is noted that the imposition of the anti-dumping duties was overall found to be beneficial for the Union producers and not found to be disproportionately negative for the other relevant operators.
Påstanden om forskelsbehandling mellem disse parter må dog afvises kategorisk, da alle parter i undersøgelsen fik tilbudt samme behandling, og alle interesser hos samarbejdsvillige erhvervsdrivende som f.eks. importører, detailhandlere, EU-producenter, der foretager udlicitering, og forbrugere blev nøje gennemgået og analyseret i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
The allegation of discrimination between those parties is however strongly rejected as the same treatment was offered to all parties in the investigation and all interests of cooperating economic operators such as importers, retailers, outsourcing Union producers and consumers were carefully considered and analysed in the investigation.
En lang række parter hævdede, at importørernes fortjeneste ikke ville være stor nok til at dække de øgede importomkostninger, udviklingen i valutakurserne, omkostningerne ved at skifte til andre forsyningskilder og antidumpingtolden.
Several parties claimed that the importers’ profits would not be high enough to shoulder increased import costs, exchange rate developments, cost of switching to other sources of supply and anti-dumping duties.
Denne påstand var dog ikke begrundet i tilstrækkeligt omfang.
This claim has however not been sufficiently substantiated.
Som det fremgår af tabel 22 er importørernes fortjeneste af en sådan størrelse — dvs. ca. 20 % — at det fremgår, at de stadig kan dække førnævnte omkostninger.
As shown in table 22, the order of magnitude of the profit of importers, i.e. around 20 %, is such that it appears that they still have room to shoulder the aforementioned costs.
En række parter har hævdet, at argumentet om, at importørerne let kan skifte forsyningskilder, er faktuelt forkert og forsimplet.
Some parties have claimed that the argument that importers could easily switch sources of supply is factually incorrect and simplistic.
En af de interesserede parter hævdede, at der ikke fandtes alternative forsyningskilder.
One interested party claimed that there were no alternative sources of supply.
Det skal i den forbindelse nævnes, at det aldrig er blevet hævdet, at det vil være let at skifte forsyningskilde.
In this respect, it is noted that it was never stated that switching sources of supply would be easy.
Kommissionen benægter ikke, at det vil indebære ekstra omkostninger og kræve tid at skifte leverandør, og at visse importører har langvarige forretningsforbindelser med deres leverandører.
The Commission does not deny that switching suppliers might entail extra costs and requires time and that some importers have long terms relationships with their suppliers.
På grundlag af oplysningerne fra importørerne i stikprøven og en importør, der ikke indgik i stikprøven, kunne det dog i forordningens betragtning 452 konkluderes, at der findes en betydelig grad af fleksibilitet, og at de erhvervsdrivende, der ønsker det, har mulighed for at skifte leverandør.
Based on the information gathered from the sampled importers and another non-sampled importer, it could however be concluded in recital 452 of the Regulation that a significant degree of flexibility existed and that any additional efforts to switch sources were not such as to prevent those operators from doing so.
Disse importører øgede faktisk deres forsyninger fra tredjelande betydeligt, således som det fremgår af tabel 19.
Indeed, those importers significantly increased their supply from third countries as shown in table 19.
Den samme tendens kunne konstateres for importører, der ikke indgik i stikprøven, idet Eurostat har kunnet konstatere en stigning på fire procentpoint for import fra tredjelande (tabel 7).
The same trend was observed for non-sampled importers, given that Eurostat shows an increase of 4 percentage points as regards imports from third countries (table 7).
En række interesserede parter hævdede, at opretholdelsen af foranstaltninger vil intensivere nedgangen i beskæftigelsen i Unionen, navnlig for så vidt angår importører og detailhandlere.
Some interested parties argued that the continuation of measures will intensify job decline in the Union, certainly with regard to importers and retailers.
De interesserede parter underbyggede ikke denne påstand med dokumentation.
This claim was not substantiated by the interested parties.
Desuden viser oplysningerne i sagen, at den beskæftigelse, der er relateret til den pågældende vare, steg med 6 % fra 2005 til UP, for så vidt angår importørerne i stikprøven.
Moreover, the file shows that, as concerns the sampled importers, employment related to the product concerned increased by 6 % from 2005 to the RIP.
Det blev hævdet, at der manglede en analyse af de potentielle fordele for importørerne ved ikke at opretholde foranstaltningerne.
It was claimed that an analysis of potential benefits of discontinuation of measures to importers was missing.
I den forbindelse skal det bemærkes, at i henhold til antidumpinggrundforordningens artikel 21 skal det undersøges, om der er tvingende grunde til ikke at indføre antidumpingforanstaltninger.
In this regard, it is noted that based on the wording of Article 21 of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, it has to be analysed if there are compelling reasons not to impose anti-dumping measures.
I forbindelse med en udløbsundersøgelse betyder det, at det skal undersøges, om der findes tvingende grunde til ikke at opretholde foranstaltningerne, dvs. der skal findes negative virkninger forbundet med en forlængelse af foranstaltningerne, og disse virkninger skal afvejes i forhold til fordelene for EU-erhvervsgrenen for at vurdere, om de negative virkninger er uforholdsmæssigt store.
In the framework of an expiry review this means that it has to be analysed if there exist compelling reasons not to maintain the measures, i.e. negative effects of a prolongation of those measures have to be identified and those effects have to be balanced against the benefits of the Union industry in order to assess if those negative effects are disproportionate.
Fra et juridisk synspunkt skal det modsatte tilfælde, hvor foranstaltningerne får lov at udløbe, kun analyseres yderligere, hvis der i sagen er specifikke tegn på, at dette vil medføre en uforholdsmæssigt stor byrde for importører, detailhandlere eller forbrugerne.
Thus, from a legal point of view, the opposite scenario, i.e. letting measures expire, would only need to be further analysed if there are specific indications in the case that this would constitute a disproportionate burden for importers, retailers or consumers.
Der blev ikke konstateret sådanne tegn.
No such indications were found.
For god ordens skyld skal følgende dog nævnes om de sandsynlige virkninger for importører, detailhandlere og forbrugere, hvis foranstaltningerne udløber.
However, and for the sake of the argument only, the following could be said about the likely effects on importers, retailers and consumers if measures would lapse.
For så vidt angår importørerne, viste undersøgelsen, at en vis del af den nedgang i fortjenesten, som de har oplevet fra 2005 og indtil UP, kunne tilskrives den antidumpingtold, som de har betalt.
As regards importers, the investigation showed that a certain part of their loss of profitability from 2005 until the RIP could be attributed to the anti-dumping duties paid.
Får foranstaltningerne lov at udløbe, og forbliver alle andre omkostninger stabile, forsvinder disse omkostninger, og fortjenstniveauet kunne i så fald stige til et niveau, der er højere end de ca. 20 %, der blev konstateret i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
Should measures lapse and all other costs remain stable, these costs would disappear and in that respect, the profit levels might increase to a level higher than the roughly 20 % found during the investigation.
For detailhandlernes vedkommende er det på grundlag af de foreliggende oplysninger uklart, om de vil opnå en fordel, hvis foranstaltningerne udløber, fordi importørerne i stikprøven ikke i alle tilfælde justerer deres videresalgspris, hvis importpriserne falder, hvilket fremgår af en sammenligning af den aritmetiske gennemsnitlige importpris og den aritmetiske gennemsnitlige videresalgspris fra 2007 og indtil UP.
For retailers, it is unclear from the information on file whether they would benefit from an expiry of the measures, because the sampled importers did not always adapt their resale prices in case the import prices dropped, as it can be seen by a comparison of the arithmetic average import price and arithmetic average resales price from 2007 to the RIP.
Hvad angår virkningerne for forbrugerne, er det endnu mere usandsynligt, at udløb af foranstaltningerne vil medføre faldende priser, da detailpriserne forblev stort set stabile på trods af bevægelserne i importpriserne fra 2005 og indtil UP.
As regards the effect on consumers, it is even more unlikely that an expiry of the measures would lead to decreasing prices, given that retail prices remained largely stable despite the price movements at import level from 2005 until the RIP.
Desuden er det ligeledes usandsynligt, at forbrugerne vil opnå fordele i form af et øget udvalg, da der ikke foreligger beviser for, at forbrugernes udvalg blev påvirket af indførelsen af antidumpingtold.
Moreover, it is unlikely as well that consumers would benefit via an increased choice given that there is no evidence on file demonstrating that the choice for the consumers was affected by the imposition of anti-dumping duties.
Alt dette kan under alle omstændigheder ikke ændre de overordnede konklusioner om, at der ikke er tvingende grunde til ikke at opretholde foranstaltningerne.
In any event, all this cannot alter the overall conclusions that there are no compelling reasons not to maintain the measures.
En række importører og deres sammenslutninger hævdede, at virkningerne af krisen blev undervurderet, og at de negative virkninger af den økonomiske afmatning vil blive større og større.
Some importers and their associations claimed that the impact of the crisis was underestimated and that the effects of the downturn will continue to worsen.
For det første er der ikke forelagt tilstrækkelig dokumentation for disse påstande, da der ikke blev forelagt konkrete data vedrørende den pågældende vare.
Firstly, these claims have been insufficiently substantiated as not concrete data relating to the product concerned was submitted.
Som anført i forordningens betragtning 436 ff. er virkningerne af krisen indtil juni 2009 blevet analyseret på grundlag af de bedste foreliggende data, dvs. der blev udsendt endnu et spørgeskema for at undersøge dette specifikke emne.
As stated in recitals 436 et seqq. of the Regulation, the impact of the crisis has been analysed until June 2009 on the basis of best data available i.e. an additional questionnaire was sent out in order to have a look specifically at this issue.
På grundlag af de oplysninger, som blev indhentet, blev der gennemført en nøje analyse af de foreliggende data, og det er klart, at denne analyse hovedsageligt er baseret på data fra perioden indtil juni 2009.
On the basis of the information collected, a prudent analysis of the data obtained was done and it is clear that this analysis is mainly based on data until June 2009.