natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der blev allerede i betragtning 337 ovenfor givet en begrundelse for fastsættelsen af de makroøkonomiske indikatorer, og en yderligere uddybning er derfor ikke nødvendig.
The justification for the establishment of the macro indicators were already explained above in recital 337 and would therefore require no further assessment.
En interesseret part påstod, at de makroøkonomiske indikatorer alligevel ikke var pålidelige.
One interested party indicated that the macro indicators in any event were not reliable.
En stigning i beskæftigelsen på 359 % siden den oprindelige undersøgelse blev givet som eksempel på, hvorfor indikatorerne skulle betragtes som urimelige.
The fact that an increase of employment of 359 % had been seen since the original investigation was given as an example of why the figures had to be considered unreasonable.
Påstanden blev underbygget af en bemærkning om, at de makroøkonomiske indikatorer i flere tilfælde adskilte sig fra indikatorerne i stikprøven.
This claim was supported by the observation showing that the macro indicators on several occasions were different from those observed in the sample.
En række interesserede parter påstod, at de fremlagte forbrugstendenser var usammenhængende, da en del af dokumentet nævnte et fald på 7 %, mens der omtales et fald på 14 % i en anden del af dokumentet.
Several interested parties indicated that the consumption trends disclosed were incoherent as one part of the document mentioned a decrease of 7 % while a 14 % decrease is mentioned in another part of the document.
Ligeledes blev oplysningerne om produktionskapaciteten og beskæftigelsen betragtet som usammenhængende, da de viste forskellige tendenser, selv om det i fremlæggelsesdokumentet blev angivet, at de to var forbundet.
Similarly, the data on production capacity and the data on employment were considered inconsistent as these showed different trends even if the disclosure document concluded that the two were linked.
Hvad angår kilderne, indhentede Kommissionen fra de nationale sammenslutninger de oplysninger, som de kunne forventes at råde over, jf. betragtning 225-226.
As to the sources and as explained above in recital 225-226, the Commission requested and obtained from national associations the information that was reasonably at their disposal.
Det er ikke usædvanligt, at disse oplysninger ikke omfatter alle skadesindikatorer, og det viser blot, at disse sammenslutninger ikke har adgang til oplysninger vedrørende visse specifikke indikatorer.
The fact that this does not cover all injury indicators is in no way an anomaly, but rather a reflection that such bodies simply do not have access to data pertaining to some specific indicators.
Derfor indhenter de undersøgende myndigheder disse oplysninger fra en repræsentativ stikprøve af virksomheder.
This is why the investigating authority obtains such data from a representative sample of companies.
De ni besvarelser fra de nationale sammenslutninger, tegner sig for en væsentlig del af produktionen (over 80 % af EU-produktionen) og blev suppleret med statistiske oplysninger og andre data fra de interesserede parter.
The nine replies obtained from the national associations account for a large majority of production (above 80 % of total Union production) and were further complemented from available statistical information and other data provided by interested parties.
Hvad angår beskæftigelsesniveauet, skal det erindres, at tallet i den oprindelige undersøgelse, 57000 ansatte, var baseret på oplysninger fra klagerne.
Concerning the level of employment it is recalled that in the original investigation, the figure of 57000 workers was based on the complainants’ figures.
De nuværende tal for beskæftigelsen på 262000 er en makroøkonomisk indikator og vedrører hele EU-erhvervsgrenen, jf. ovenfor.
The current employment figure of 262000 is a macro indicator and pertains to the Union industry as defined above.
Vedrørende forskelle mellem indikatorerne for stikprøven og for hele EU-erhvervsgrenen skal det erindres, at disse indikatorer ikke behøver at afspejle hinanden fuldstændigt for at være repræsentative.
As for the differences between the indicators for the sample and for the whole Union Industry, it is recalled that those indicators do not need to perfectly mirror each other to be representative.
Deres repræsentativitet er sikret, idet de følger de samme tendenser.
The fact that they followed the same trends further attest to their representativeness.
Hvad angår de påståede uoverensstemmelser vedrørende forbruget, henviste faldet på 7 % til perioden 2006-UP, mens faldet på 14 % henviste til perioden 2005-UP.
As to the alleged inconsistency for the consumption, the 7 % decrease referred to the period 2006 — RIP while the 14 % decrease referred to the period 2005 — RIP.
Ud fra ovenstående afvises bemærkningerne om sammensætningen og analysen af de makroøkonomiske indikatorer.
In view of the above, the comments with regard to the composition and the analysis of the macro indicators must be rejected.
Virkningen af de mikroøkonomiske indikatorer
Impact of micro indicators
En interesseret part påstod, at EU-erhvervsgrenens fortjeneste på 3 % skulle betragtes som et godt resultat især i betragtning af, at markedet er vigende.
One interested party indicated that the 3 % profit reached by the Union industry should be considered as a good result, in particular when considering that the market is contracting.
Det blev desuden anført, at påstanden om, at EU-erhvervsgrenen er udsat for et pristryk fra importen fra Kina og Vietnam, ikke var dokumenteret af resultaterne, idet EU-erhvervsgrenen var i stand til at hæve priserne med 30 % i den betragtede periode.
It was also indicated that the claim that the Union industry is facing price pressure from the Chinese and Vietnamese imports was not supported by the findings that the Union industry managed to raise prices by 30 % in the period considered.
Som det fremgår af den oprindelige undersøgelse, er den forventede fortjeneste uden skadevoldende dumping på 6 %, altså langt over de ca. 3 %, som EU-erhvervsgrenen opnåede, hvilket desuden ikke er nok til at sikre erhvervsgrenens overlevelse på mellemlang sigt og finansiere den igangværende omstruktureringsproces. Dette skal desuden sammenlignes med importørernes høje fortjenester.
As established in the original investigation, the profit level expected in the absence of injurious dumping is 6 %, well above the ca. 3 % level achieved by the Union industry, which is furthermore not high enough to assure the viability in the medium term and to finance the ongoing restructuring process This is also to be compared with the very healthy profit level of importers.
Hvad angår EU-erhvervsgrenens salgspriser, hindrede stigningen ikke direkte konkurrence mellem varerne, hvilket påvirkede underbuddet.
As for the Union Industry's sales prices, their increase did not prevent direct competition between the products and therefore undercutting and underselling have been affected.
De lave fortjenstmargener er et bevis på, at der udøves et pristryk, da EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke kan få en højere avance.
The low profit margin proves the price pressure, as the Union industry cannot apply a higher mark-up.
Ud fra ovenstående afvises påstandene om analysen af de mikroøkonomiske indikatorer.
In view of the above, the arguments with regard to the analysis of the micro indicators must be rejected.
Underbudsanalysen
Undercutting analysis
En række interesserede parter satte spørgsmålstegn ved Kommissionens underbudsanalyse.
Several interested parties indicated concerns as to the undercutting analysis carried out by the Commission.
Det blev i den forbindelse påstået, at Kommissionen kunstigt havde skabt et større match mellem varekontrolnumrene ved at omklassificere visse skotyper fra varegruppe E til A.
In this context it was held that the Commission had artificially increased the matching of product control numbers, PCN's by a reclassification of certain shoes from product group E to A.
Andre interesserede parter mente, at Kommissionen havde undladt at meddele, hvorfor det niveau for justeringen for FoU, som var fastsat i den oprindelige undersøgelse, nu var lavere.
Several interested parties considered that the Commission had failed to disclose why the level of adjustment for R&D as established in the original investigation had now been decreased.
Det blev ligeledes fremført, at Kommissionen ikke havde meddelt, i hvilket omfang der var foretaget justeringer for salg til ikke-forretningsmæssigt forbundne handelsvirksomheder.
Similarly, it was considered that the Commission had not disclosed to which extent adjustments had been made for sales to unrelated trading companies..
Påstanden om, at der blev skabt et kunstigt match ved hjælp af en omklassificering af varekontrolnumrene, er ikke korrekt.
The claim that an artificial matching was obtained through a reclassification to the PCN's is not correct.
Der blev ikke foretaget nogen omklassificering, jf. betragtning 57 ff., men der blev, hvor det var nødvendigt, foretaget en korrektion, hvor parterne havde placeret varerne i en forkert kategori.
As detailed in recital 57 and onwards there was no re-classification however, where appropriate, a correction had to be done when parties had declared the shoes in the wrong category.
Hvad angår påstanden om, at der ikke blev givet en begrundelse for ændringen i justeringen for FoU, skal det bemærkes, at der anvendtes den samme metode som i den oprindelige undersøgelse til at beregne justeringen, som altså blev baseret på efterprøvede oplysninger fra de samarbejdsvillige parter vedrørende undersøgelsesperioden.
In respect of the claim that no justification was given for the change in the R&D adjustment, it should be noted that this was established using the same method as in the original investigation, i.e. on the basis of verified information supplied by the cooperating parties which refers to the RIP.
Eksportørernes cif-pris blev fastlagt på grundlag af virksomhedernes egne data, som eventuelt blev korrigeret.
The CIF price of the exporters was established based on data provided by the companies themselves and corrected where necessary.
Ud fra ovenstående afvises påstandene om en mangelfuld underbudsanalyse.
In view of the above, the claims that the undercutting analysis was deficient must be rejected.
Konklusion om fortsat skade
Conclusion of continuation of injury
En række interesserede parter påstod, at de overordnede skadesindikatorer var positive og at Kommissionen havde baseret sin konklusion om fortsat skade udelukkende på rentabiliteten.
Several interested parties claimed that the overall injury indicators were all positive and that the Commission had based the conclusion of continuation of injury solely on the profitability.
Da rentabiliteten i undersøgelsesperioden var på sit højeste siden 2001, burde denne indikator også fortolkes således, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke længere forvoldes skade.
Moreover, considering the fact that the profitability in the RIP was the highest since 2001, also this indicator should have to be interpreted as indicating that the Union industry is no longer suffering injury.
En række interesserede parter fremlagde desuden specifikke eksempler på virksomheder, der klarede sig godt, som dokumentation for deres påstand om, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke forvoldes skade.
Several interested parties did furthermore name and provide specific examples of companies that were doing well in support of their claim that Union industry was not injured.
En anden interesseret part mente, at Kommissionen ikke havde taget virkningen af den ændrede forretningsmodel i betragtning i forbindelse med vurderingen af produktion og salg samt i skadesanalysen generelt.
Another interested party considered that the Commission had failed to take into account the impact of change in the business model when assessing the production and sales as well as the injury picture in general.
Det blev ligeledes påstået, at virkningerne af udliciteringen ikke var blevet taget i betragtning, og stikprøvens gennemsnitlige fortjeneste ville iflg. denne part have været meget højere, hvis de udliciterede aktiviteter var blevet taget i betragtning.
It was similarly claimed that the effects of outsourcing had not been taken into account and according to this party the average profit of the sample would have been much higher had the outsourced activities been taken into account.
Det skal i den forbindelse understreges, at analysen af skadesindikatorerne i sagens natur er overordnet, og at der kan konstateres skade, selv om ikke alle indikatorerne viser en forværring.
In this context, it is underlined that the analysis of injury indicators is global by nature and not all indicators have to show deterioration in order for injury to be found.
Det skal også bemærkes, at foranstaltningerne fandt anvendelse i den analyserede periode, og at der derfor logisk set kan forventes en vis nedbringelse af skaden.
It should also be taken into consideration that measures were in force during the period analysed, and that therefore a certain mitigation of the injury is to be logically expected.
Til trods for dette og som allerede angivet i betragtning 257 ff. forværredes forbruget, produktionen, salget og kapacitetsudnyttelsen i løbet af perioden, underbuddet var fortsat var betydeligt, og rentabiliteten var meget lav og lå langt under det normale niveau for den fortjeneste, der kan forventes i en situation uden skadevoldende dumping.
This notwithstanding and as already established in recital 257 and onwards, consumption, production, sales,capacity utilisation showed a deterioration over the period, undercutting and underselling continued at significant levels, and profitability remained at very low levels, substantially below the normal profit to be expected in the absence of injurious dumping.
Generelt set viste analysen en delvis afhjælpning af skaden på grund af foranstaltningerne — men på ingen måde, at skaden er ophørt.
Together, the picture showed a partial removal of injury by the measures — but by no means its disappearance.
I en erhvervsgren med over 18000 virksomheder vil der helt naturligt være en spredning i de enkelte virksomheders resultater, men dette betyder dog ikke, at erhvervsgrenen som helhed ikke påføres skade.
In an industry with over 18000 companies, it is natural that there will be a spread in the performance of individual companies however, his does not imply that injury does not exist for the industry as a whole.
Det skal erindres, at analysen af de makroøkonomiske indikatorer for hele erhvervsgrenen og de mikroøkonomiske indikatorer for en repræsentativ stikprøve af producenter (begge jf. grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 1, viste, at der fortsat forvoldtes skade.
It is recalled that the analysis of macro indicators for the whole industry and micro indicators for a representative sample of producers (both as per Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation), showed that injury had continued.
Hvad angår virkningerne af den ændrede forretningsmodel, vedrører den beregnede gennemsnitlige fortjeneste til EU-producenterne i stikprøven.
As concern the impact of the change in business model, the calculated average profit refers to the sampled Union producers.
Alle ændringer (i bl.a. forretningsmodel, handelsled) blev indarbejdet i analysen.
All the changes (i.a. business model, level of trade) were included in the analysis.
En virksomheds aktivitet som importør kan ifølge lovens krav ikke tilskrives virksomhedens situation som producent.
As per the requirements of the law, an operator's activity as an importer can not be ascribed to its situation as producer.
Ud fra ovenstående foretages der ingen ændringer i konklusionerne om skade i betragtning 257-260.
In view of the foregoing, the conclusions on injury as established in recitals 257-260 remain unchanged.
BEMÆRKNINGER VEDRØRENDE ÅRSAGSSAMMENHÆNGEN MELLEM EU-ERHVERVSGRENENS SKADE OG DUMPINGIMPORTEN
COMMENTS RECEIVED PERTAINING TO THE CAUSAL LINK BETWEEN THE INJURY SUSTAINED BY UNION INDUSTRY AND THE DUMPED IMPORTS
En række interesserede parter mente, at Kommissionen havde undladt at tage hele virkningen af andre faktorer for EU-producenternes økonomiske levedygtighed i betragtning.
Several interested parties considered that the Commission had failed to consider the full impact of other causes on the financial viability of the Union producers.
Det blev generelt påstået, at Kommissionen havde anvendt en snæver indgangsvinkel i forbindelse med virkningen af andre faktorer.
In general it was claimed that the Commission had taken an isolationist approach to the impact of other causes.
Det blev i den henseende påstået, at analysen af hver faktor isoleret set havde betydet, at alle virkninger med undtagelse af den, der var genstand for analysen, blev tilskrevet dumpingimporten.
In this context it was held that the assessment of each issue in isolation had meant that all effects except the one assessed at the time, were attributed to the dumped imports.
En række interesserede parter mente, at Kommissionen havde undervurderet virkningen af importen fra tredjelande.
Several interested parties considered that the Commission had under-estimated the impact of imports from third countries.
Parterne anførte, at den vejede gennemsnitspris på importen fra tredjelande kun var 0,39 EUR højere end prisen på importen fra Folkerepublikken Kina og Vietnam og derfor havde en betydelig indvirkning på EU-erhvervsgrenen.
According to these parties the weighted average price of imports from third countries was only EUR 0,39 higher than those of the PRC and Vietnam and would therefore have a significant impact on Union industry.
Det blev desuden anført, at hvis sammenligningen havde været baseret på hjemtagningspriser og ikke cif-priser, ville priserne på import fra især Indien og Indonesien have været lavere end priserne for de pågældende lande.
It was also indicated that had the comparison been based on landed values, rather than the CIF values, the prices of imports from in particular India and Indonesia would be lower than those of the countries concerned.
En række parter påstod, at Kommissionen ikke havde begrundet sin konklusion om, at der var konkurrence mellem den pågældende vare importeret fra Kina og Vietnam og den samme vare, der produceres i Unionen.
Several parties claimed that the Commission had failed to justify the conclusion that there was competition between the product concerned and the like product produced in the Union.
Det blev endvidere påstået, at denne konklusion var i modstrid med en række afsnit i fremlæggelsesdokumentet, hvoraf det fremgik, hvorledes EU-erhvervsgrenen er koncentreret i det mellemste og højeste segment.
It was also claimed that this conclusion would be contradictory as several sections in the disclosure document had described how the Union industry is concentrated to the mid to high end segment.
Det blev vurderet, at dette resultat var i modstrid med konklusionen om, at EU-erhvervsgrenen konkurrerer med varer fra Kina og Vietnam i det billigste varesegment.
This finding was considered difficult to reconcile with the conclusion that the Union industry competes with the Chinese and Vietnamese low end products.
En interesseret part mente, at Kommissionen havde undladt at give en definition af varerne i det højeste, mellemste og laveste segment, og påstod, at der ikke forelå bevis for, at EU-erhvervsgrenen reelt ændrede strategi til et højere segment.
One interested party considered that the Commission had failed to provide a definition of what was to be considered as high, mid and low end products and claimed that no evidence had been provided showing that the Union industry was actually moving upmarket.
En interesseret part mente, at Kommissionen havde undladt at tage indvirkningen af det ændrede forbrug og krisen på EU-erhvervsgrenen i betragtning.
One interested party considered that the Commission had failed to take into account the impact of the change in consumption and crisis on Union industry.
Det blev navnlig anført, at Kommissionen fejlagtigt havde konkluderet, at importpriserne ville falde som følge af krisen, for den faktiske udvikling i de 6 måneder efter undersøgelsesperioden viste et fald i mængderne og en stigning i priserne.
In particular it was considered that the Commission had wrongly concluded that import prices would decrease as a consequence of the crisis when the actual developments in the 6 months following the RIP showed a decrease in volumes and an increase in price.
En interesseret part mente, at Kommissionen ikke havde fremlagt tilstrækkelige beviser for, at erhvervsgrenens problemer ikke skyldtes strukturelle mangler.
One interested party considered that the Commission had not provided sufficient evidence demonstrating that structural deficiencies would not be the reason for the problems facing industry.
Denne part mente, at påstanden om, at de virksomheder, der havde ændret forretningsmodel, også påførtes skade, burde afvises, idet parten mente, at en ændring i forretningsmodel i sig selv ikke i tilstrækkeligt omfang antydede, at virksomhederne ikke havde strukturelle problemer.
According to this party, the argument that injury was at hand also for the companies that had changed business model had to be rejected as it was considered that a change in business model as such would not necessarily indicate that there were no structural problems at hand.
I tillæg til de andre faktorer ovenfor påstod en interesseret part, at Kommissionen i den overordnede analyse af andre faktorer havde undladt at vurdere virkningerne af en omstrukturering af forretningsmodellen for EU-producenternes fortjeneste, virkningen af EU-erhvervsgrenens udlicitering og virkningen af manglen på faglærte arbejdstagere.
In addition to the other causes mentioned above, one interested party claimed that the Commission had failed to assess in the overall analysis of other causes, the effects of remodelling of the business model on the profit of the Union producers and the effect of the outsourcing with Union industry as well as the effect of lack of skilled workers.
Det erindres i den forbindelse, at der blev udført en meget grundig og omfattende analyse af de øvrige faktorer som led i denne undersøgelse.
In this context it is recalled that a most careful and comprehensive analysis of other factors has been made in the context of the review.
Det erindres desuden, jf. betragtning 285, at disse faktorer blev analyseret samlet og individuelt, og påstanden om, at Kommissionen antog en isolationistisk indgangsvinkel, kan derfor ikke godtages.
It is also recalled, as concluded in recital 285, that these factors were analysed taken together as well as individually and the claim that the Commission was using an isolationist approach can therefore not be upheld.
Vedrørende virkningen af importen fra tredjelande blev det i undersøgelsen fastslået, at der var betydelige forskelle i prisen mellem de pågældende lande og andre tredjelande, hvis gennemsnitlige priser generelt ligger betydeligt højere end Folkerepublikken Kinas og Vietnams.
In relation to the impact of imports from third countries the investigation had established that there are considerable differences in import price between the countries concerned and other third countries, most of which have average prices significantly higher than the PRC's and Vietnam's.
Det fremgår desuden af betragtning 277, at disse forskelle også gælder Indien og Indonesien, når der sammenlignes med Folkerepublikken Kina.
It is recalled from recital 277 that these differences apply also, to India and in when compared to the PRC also to Indonesia.
Selv om der ses bort fra forskellene i importpriserne, er markedsandelen for Indien og Indonesien kun på 8 % og 5 % i forhold til en markedsandel på 29 % for Folkerepublikken Kina og Vietnam.
Furthermore, even if one were to set aside the difference in import prices the market share of India and Indonesia is only 8 % and 5 % respectively, as compared to the 29 % market share of the PRC and Vietnam.
Hvad angår importmængden, kan virkningen af importen derfor ikke bryde årsagssammenhængen.
In terms of volumes, the impact of imports does therefore not break the causal link.