natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den normale værdi blev derfor beregnet konservativt.
As a result, the normal value has been established conservatively.
Hvad angår acceleratorer, chassistyper og energiniveauer, skal det bemærkes, at de krævede justeringer falder under grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, men de påståede forskelle mellem faktorerne har ikke vist sig at påvirke prisen og prissammenligneligheden, idet den kinesiske producent ikke fremlagde oplysninger, der kunne berettige en justering.
With respect to the accelerators, types of chassis and energy levels, it should be noted that the requested adjustments fall under Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation but the differences in factors claimed have not been demonstrated to affect price and price comparability since no information was provided by the Chinese producer that could warrant an adjustment.
Den kinesiske producent påstod, at acceleratoren er en vigtig bestanddel af den pågældende vare og burde have været inkluderet i varekontrolnummerets struktur.
The Chinese producer submitted that the accelerator is an important component of the product concerned and should have been included in the product control number structure.
Kommissionen inkluderede ikke acceleratoren i varekontrolnummerets struktur, da ingen af parterne fremlagde dokumentation, der antydede, at acceleratoren var en faktor, der gør det muligt at skelne mellem de forskellige varetyper.
The Commission did not include the accelerator in the product control number structure as none of the parties concerned presented any evidence that pointed to the fact that the accelerator was a factor distinguishing the different product types.
Den kinesiske producent anmodede også om en afgrænsning og kvantificering af de justeringer, der blev foretaget af den normale værdi med henblik på at beregne den ab fabrik.
The Chinese producer also requested identification and quantification of the adjustments made to the normal value in order to bring it back to an ex-works basis.
Der blev foretaget justeringer for garanti- og kreditomkostninger af den normale værdi på grundlag af salgsprisen på hjemmemarkedet hos den eneste amerikanske producent af den samme vare.
Adjustments for warranty and credit costs were made to the normal value determined on the basis of the domestic sales prices of the sole US producer of the like product.
Den normale værdi blev justeret for omkostninger til transport, garantier, uddannelse, dokumentation og agenter grundlag af data fra EU-erhvervsgrenen.
Adjustments for transport costs, warranty costs, training costs, documentation costs and agent fees were made to the normal value determined on the basis of data of the Union industry.
Hvad angår anmodningen om en kvantificering af disse justeringer, kan Kommissionen ikke fremlægge disse data, da de betragtes som fortrolige.
Concerning the request for quantification of these adjustments, the Commission is not able to disclose such data as this information is considered confidential by nature.
Det skal bemærkes, at de tilsvarende data ved beregningen af eksportprisen ab fabrik, på samme vis heller ikke blev fremlagt for EU-erhvervsgrenen.
It must be noted that, similarly, when calculating the ex-works export price, the corresponding data was not disclosed to the Union industry.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 47 og 48 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (47) and (48) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Den kinesiske producent kritiserede det forhold, at visse salgstransaktioner blev udelukket fra dumpingberegningen.
The Chinese producer criticised the fact that some sales were excluded from the dumping calculation.
Det skal i den forbindelse bemærkes, at salgsværdien af de pågældende transaktioner oprindeligt blev taget i betragtning ved fastsættelsen af eksportpriserne.
In this respect it is noted that the sales values of the transactions in question were originally considered for the establishment of the export prices.
Der kunne imidlertid ikke fastsættes en normal værdi for disse transaktioner.
However, the normal value for these transactions could not be established.
Der kunne derfor ikke foretages en sammenligning mellem den normale værdi og eksportprisen.
Thus, no comparison could be made between normal value and export price.
Den kinesiske producent påstod desuden, at cif-værdien af de i betragtning 50 omhandlede salgstransaktioner burde have været inkluderet i den samlede cif-værdi, der blev anvendt som nævner i dumpingberegningen.
The Chinese producer also claimed that the CIF values of the sales mentioned in recital (50) should have been included in the total CIF value which served as a denominator for the dumping calculations.
Beregningen af den samlede dumping er et resultat af en division af summen af den konstaterede dumping (hvor der kan foretages en prissammenligning) med summen af de tilsvarende cif-værdier.
The calculation of a total dumping is the result of the division of the sum of the different dumping found (where a price comparison can be made) with the sum of the corresponding CIF values.
Hvis man i beregningen inkluderede cif-værdierne for salg, hvor der ikke kunne foretages en sammenligning mellem den normale værdi og eksportprisen, idet der ikke var fastsat en normal værdi, ville dette medføre en regnefejl i beregningerne, da tælleren og nævneren ikke længere refererer til sammenlignelige transaktioner.
The inclusion in the calculations of the CIF values of sales for which no comparison between normal value and export price could be made due to a lack of an established normal value, would cause an arithmetical flaw in these calculations as the nominator and the denominator would no longer refer to comparable transactions.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 49 og 50 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (49) and (50) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ud fra ovenstående fastsættes de endelige dumpingmargener, udtrykt i procent af cif-prisen, EU's grænse, ufortoldet, til 38,8 %.
Taking into account the above, the definitive dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price duty unpaid, is 38,8 %.
Kun den kinesiske producent indsendte bemærkninger til konklusionerne om skade, hvoraf nogle var en gentagelse af bemærkninger i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Comments on the findings concerning injury were received only from the Chinese producer, some of which were a mere repetition of comments already addressed in the provisional Regulation.
Påstande med bemærkninger, der allerede blev behandlet i forordningen om midlertidig told, er ikke medtaget i denne forordning.
Arguments concerning comments already addressed in the provisional Regulation are not repeated in this Regulation.
Det erindres, at der i denne procedure er fremlagt oplysninger vedrørende to EU-producenter og en eksporterende producent, som i alt væsentligt udgør EU-markedet.
It is recalled that in this case the information presented refers to two Union producers and one exporting producer which represent essentially the Union market.
Der kan derfor ikke anføres præcise tal af hensyn til beskyttelse af virksomhedernes fortrolige oplysninger.
Account taken of the above, no precise figures can be given in order to protect business proprietary information.
Indikatorerne er således anført ved hjælp af indekstal.
Thus, indicators are given in indexed form or ranges.
I sit svar til fremlæggelsen af de foreløbige konklusioner påstod den kinesiske producent, at skadesanalysen måtte foretages på årsbasis.
In its reply to the provisional disclosure, the Chinese producer requested that the injury analysis be presented on an annualised basis.
Selv om dette ikke ændrer substansen af disse data, men kun fremstillingen, blev påstanden betragtet som berettiget, og analysen herunder er fortaget på årsbasis.
Although this does not alter the substance of the data, but only its presentation, the claim was considered warranted and thus the analysis presented hereunder is annualised throughout.
Den kinesiske producent anfægtede de data, der var anvendt i den virksomhedsspecifikke fremlæggelse af de foreløbige konklusioner om virksomhedens salgsmængder i den betragtede periode (fra 2004 til udgangen af UP).
The Chinese producer disputed the data provided in the company specific provisional disclosure document on its sales volume for the period considered (from 2004 up to the end of the IP).
Det skal bemærkes, at Kommissionen fremlagde en omfattende og fuldstændig opgørelse over de samlede data til den kinesiske producent.
It is noted that the Commission provided an exhaustive and complete break down to the Chinese producer of the compiled data.
Al feedback fra den kinesiske producent blev derfor krydstjekket med de foreliggende oplysninger fra medlemsstaternes myndigheder i deres egenskab af brugere af den pågældende vare og fra EU-producenterne.
Feed-back received by the Chinese producer was consequently cross checked with the available information provided by the authorities of Member States as users of the product concerned and the producers in the Union.
De nærmere oplysninger om den kinesiske virksomheds salg til EU og salgets virkninger var således kendt i den endelige fase af undersøgelsen.
Therefore, at the definitive stage of the investigation the details concerning the Chinese sales to the Union and its respective impact were known.
Den kinesiske producent påstod, at EU-erhvervsgrenens salg bør udelukkes fra analysen af skade og årsagssammenhæng, i de tilfælde hvor EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke afgav bud.
The Chinese producer argued that where there is no bid from the Union industry, its sales should be excluded from the injury and causation analysis.
Det skal dog bemærkes, at institutionerne ikke kan gøre gældende, at EU-erhvervsgrenen påførte sig selv skade, idet den i UP ikke afgav bud i et specifikt udbud og idet den kinesiske eksporterende producent afgav bud, i et sådant omfang, at det brød årsagssammenhængen mellem skade og dumping.
However it should be noted that the institutions cannot claim that the fact that, during the IP the Union industry did not bid in a specific tender but the Chinese exporting producer did, entailed a self-inflicted injury to such an extent that broke the causal link between injury and dumping.
Deltagelse i et udbud er desuden ikke omkostningsfrit (oversættelse, agenter, i visse tilfælde betaling for at afgive bud), så virksomhederne afgiver ikke bud, hvis de ikke er sikre på at have en chance.
Moreover, to participate in a tender does not come without a cost (translations, agent, sometimes paying for the tendering, etc.) so companies do not bid if they are not sure that they have a chance.
Det blev endvidere påstået, at hvis klageren (Smiths Detection Group Limited) afgav bud, der oversteg prisloftet i udbuddene, burde det udelukkes fra analysen af skade og årsagssammenhæng.
It was also claimed that where the complainant (Smiths Detection Group Limited) made offers exceeding the price ceiling specified in tenders, it should be excluded from the injury and causation analysis.
Undersøgelsen har dog ikke afsløret verificerbare oplysninger, der bekræfter sådanne bud.
Nevertheless, the investigation has not brought to light any verifiable information confirming that such offers existed.
Den kinesiske producent påstod, at der er en asymmetri i skadesdataene.
The Chinese producer submitted that there is an asymmetry of the injury data.
Dette skyldes, at salgsmængder, markedsandele og fortjeneste refererer til salg pr. kontraktdato, mens andre skadesfaktorer blev udledt af klagerens finansielle regnskaber og derfor ikke nødvendigvis svarer til det samme tidspunkt.
This is because sales volumes, market share and profit refer to sales by contract date while certain other injury factors were derived from the financial accounting of the complainant and therefore may not correspond in time.
Ved indledningen af denne undersøgelse satte Kommissionens tjenestegrene en nøjagtig skæringsdato for salg, som kunne anvendes for alle samarbejdsvillige virksomheder i undersøgelsen.
At the beginning of this investigation, the Commission services had to set a clear-cut reference point for sales which would be applicable to all companies cooperating with the proceeding.
Det blev besluttet, at kontraktdatoen var den bedste skæringsdato, idet der ofte er et stort tidsrum mellem datoen for indledningen af udbudsproceduren og kontraktdatoen, samt mellem kontraktdatoen og den endelige fakturadato.
It was decided that the contract date provided the best reference point because there is often a large time gap between tender initiation dates and the contract date, as well as between the contract date and the final invoice date.
Flere fakturaer indgår ofte i en kontrakt, og en kontrakt kan omfatte flere år.
In addition, several invoices often cover a contract and a contract can cover several years.
Idet kontraktdatoen blev anvendt som skæringsdato, var det ikke praktisk muligt at anmode EU-producenterne om at opstille deres spørgeskemabesvarelser på grundlag af kontraktdatoerne.
Having set the contract date as the reference point, it was not practicable to ask the Union producers to compile their entire questionnaire response on the basis of contract dates.
Dette ville have betydet, at de skulle opstille deres regnskaber på en måde, som ikke er normal praksis, og som ville have medført tvetydige oplysninger med deraf følgende negativ indvirkning på kvaliteten af sådanne oplysninger.
To do so would have meant that they should have had to completely rework their accounting in a manner which is not normal practice and which would have introduced numerous ambiguities with the consequent negative impact on the quality of such information.
Da det som sagt ikke var realistisk at anvende fakturadatoerne som skæringsdato, blev skadesdataene i dette tilfælde suppleret bedst muligt for denne vare.
Bearing in mind that it was not viable to use invoice dates as the reference point, the injury data was supplied in this case in the best manner possible for this product.
I løbet af de ti måneder, undersøgelsen har stået på, dvs. i svaret på fremlæggelsen af de foreløbige konklusioner, anfægtede den kinesiske producent også det forhold, at UP omfattede en periode på 18 måneder, og udtalte, at den burde have været begrænset til kalenderåret 2008.
In the course of month ten of the investigation i.e. in its provisional disclosure response, the Chinese producer also disputed the fact that the IP covered an 18-month period, stating that it should have been limited to the calendar year of 2008.
Denne påstand blev afvist med henvisning til begrundelsen for at anvende en periode på 18 måneder, jf. forordningen om midlertidig told, og betragtning 5–11.
This claim had to be rejected because of the reasons supporting an 18-month period as set out in the provisional Regulation and in recitals (5) to (11).
En sådan ændring ville desuden have hindret en rettidig afslutning af undersøgelsen, idet det ville betyde, at samtlige samarbejdsvillige virksomheder skulle genindsende deres spørgeskemabesvarelser på grundlag af en revideret UP.
Moreover, such change would have prevented the timely conclusion of the investigation because it would have meant asking all cooperating companies to re-submit their questionnaire responses on the basis of a revised IP.
Den kinesiske producent rejste desuden tvivl om, hvorvidt de mange EU-virksomheder, som var forretningsmæssigt forbundne med klageren, var korrekt inkluderet i Kommissionens skadesanalyse.
The Chinese producer also cast doubts as to whether the many EU companies related to the complainant were properly included in the Commission’s injury analysis.
Efterprøvningen af klagerens spørgeskemabesvarelse blev gennemført i samarbejde med hele gruppen, og Kommissionen forvissede sig om, at skadesindikatorerne og beregningerne blev analyseret korrekt for hele gruppen.
However the verification of the complainant’s questionnaire response was carried out with full cooperation of the entire group and the Commission was satisfied that the injury indicators and calculations were analysed properly for the entire group.
Som det blev indskærpet over for den kinesiske producent før indførelsen af de midlertidige foranstaltninger, spiller de EU-virksomheder, der henvises til, en ubetydelig rolle, om nogen, i fremstillingen og markedsføringen af den pågældende vare.
As was clarified to the Chinese producer before the adoption of the provisional measures, the EU companies to which it refers play an insignificant role, if any, in the manufacturing and marketing of the relevant product.
Deres rolle er nemlig begrænset til visse funktioner i forbindelse med salg af den pågældende vare (dvs. eftersyn) og salg af varer, der ikke falder under denne forordnings anvendelsesområde.
In fact, their role is limited to some functions referring to the sale of the product under investigation (e.g. servicing) and of products not falling within the scope of this Regulation.
Den eneste kinesiske producent påstod endelig, at for så vidt EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke kunne opfylde de tekniske krav i visse udbud eller slet ikke deltog i udbud, medførte disse transaktioner ikke dumping og deraf følgende skade for EU-erhvervsgrenen.
The Chinese producer finally claimed that, insofar as the Union industry could not meet the technical requirements of certain tenders or did not participate at all in the tenders, no dumping causing injury to the EU industry occurred for these transactions.
Dette krav kunne ikke godtages.
This claim could not be accepted.
Det skal først og fremmest bemærkes, at det forhold, at der for visse eksporttransaktioner ikke kan fastsættes en normal værdi, ikke rejser tvivl om konklusionerne vedrørende skadevoldende dumping, så længe grundlaget for beregningen kan betragtes som repræsentativt.
Firstly, it is noted that the fact that no normal value can be established for some export transactions does not put into question the finding of injurious dumping, as long as the basis for the calculation is considered as representative.
Dette var afgjort tilfældet her (jf. betragtning 50 ovenfor).
This was certainly the case here (see recital (50)).
For de pågældende specifikke transaktioner skal følgende bemærkes.
For the specific transactions in question the following should be noted.
Transaktionen vedrørende problemer med de tekniske krav vedrører en varetype, der sælges på grundlag af et udbud.
The transaction referring to technical requirement problems concerns one product type sold on the basis of one tender.
Den kinesiske producent og de to EU-producenter fortolkede udbuddet vidt forskelligt.
The Chinese producer, on the one hand, and the two Union producers on the other interpreted the tender quite differently.
Den kinesiske producent påstod ved udgangen af undersøgelsen, at den pågældende varetype adskilte sig fra en mobil scanner, mens EU-erhvervsgrenen var af en anden mening.
The Chinese producer claimed towards the end of the investigation that the product type in question was quite different from a mobile scanner while the Union industry was of a different opinion.
Det er derfor indlysende, at EU-erhvervsgrenen deltog i dette udbud ud fra den overbevisning, at den skulle tilbyde en bestemt varetype.
It is therefore clear that Union industry participated in this tender with the fair belief that it should offer a specific product type.
Det er endnu vigtigere at bemærke, at deltagelsen medførte omkostninger (oversættelse, agenter, betaling for at afgive bud osv.).
More importantly, its participation entailed costs (translations, agent, paying for the tendering etc.).
Den endelige konklusion i udbudsprocessen var, at EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke afgav bud på samme betingelser, hvilket dog ikke indebærer, at denne import ikke automatisk har bidraget til skaden.
Thus, the fact that the final conclusion of the tendering process was that the Union industry did not present a bid on the same terms does not imply that such imports have automatically not contributed to injury.
Hvad angår de resterende transaktioner, henviser den kinesiske producent til en transaktion, der ligger uden for UP, som, jf. betragtning 42, i virkeligheden var udførelsen af en kontrakt, der blev indgået tidligere.
As regards the remaining transactions the Chinese producer refers to a transaction not falling in the IP, which as explained in recital (42), is in fact a settlement of a contract concluded previously.
Den henviste også til en transaktion, hvor EU-erhvervsgrenen ikke deltog i udbuddet.
It also referred to a transaction in which the Union industry did not participate to the tender.
Hvad angår den første transaktion, var der ingen konklusion om skade.
With respect to the former transaction, no finding with respect to injury was made.
Hvad angår den sidste transaktion, gælder konklusionerne i betragtning 59.
With respect to the latter transaction, the conclusions of recital (59) apply.
EU-produktion og EU-erhvervsgrenen
Union production and Union industry
I den ellevte måned af undersøgelsen påstod en rumænsk virksomhed, at den var en EU-producent af visse systemer til scanning af fragt i UP.
In the course of month eleven of the investigation, a Romanian company came forward with the claim that it was an EU producer of certain cargo scanning systems during the IP.
Kommissionen indhentede og efterprøvede oplysningerne vedrørende denne virksomheds status.
The Commission sought and verified information concerning the actual status of this company.
Ifølge oplysningerne fra virksomheden og fra andre aktører i denne sektor, herunder den kinesiske producent, er virksomhedens engagement i den pågældende vare tæt forbundet med produktionsaktiviteterne i en veletableret EU-producent af systemer til scanning af fragt.
According to information submitted both by the company and by other actors in this market, including the Chinese producer, this company’s involvement in the like product is closely linked to the production activities of a well-established Union producer of cargo scanning systems.
I forbindelse med denne undersøgelse betragtes den rumænske virksomheds eneste salg i UP som salg foretaget af EU-producenten af systemer til scanning af fragt, som virksomheden har samarbejdet med.
Consequently, in the context of the current investigation, the only sale made by the Romanian company during the IP is considered to have been made by the Union producer of cargo scanning systems it has worked with.
Hvad angår de makroøkonomiske indikatorer såsom forbrug, produktion, kapacitetsudnyttelse, lagerbeholdning, salgsmængde, markedsandel, beskæftigelse, produktivitet og lønninger samt eksportsalg skal det bemærkes, at de er blevet analyseret for alle EU-producenter.
As regards macroeconomic indicators such as consumption, production, capacity utilisation, stocks, sales volume, market share, employment, productivity and wages, as well as export sales, it should be noted that they have been analysed with respect to all Union producers.
Da der ikke blev fremsat bemærkninger, bekræftes resultaterne i betragtning 52–56 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any other comments, the findings set out in recitals (52) to (56) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
EU-forbrug
Union consumption
Den kinesiske producent påstod, at det niveau for EU-forbruget, som var fastsat i forordningen om midlertidig told, ikke var nøjagtigt.
The Chinese producer argued that the level of the Union consumption as set out in the provisional Regulation was not accurate.
Kommissionen kontaktede i den forbindelse de interesserede parter, navnlig brugere, med henblik på at indsamle yderligere oplysninger om EU-forbruget i den betragtede periode.
In this respect, the Commission contacted interested parties, notably users, with a view to collect further information on EU consumption during the period considered.
På baggrund af de supplerede oplysninger fra parterne konkluderes det, at EU-forbruget udviklede sig således:
On the basis of additional input provided by parties, it is considered that the EU consumption developed as follows:
Kilde: Spørgeskemabesvarelser og efterfølgende redegørelser
Source: Questionnaire replies and subsequent submissions.