natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Produktion af SWR hos samarbejdsvillige virksomheder i Republikken Korea og Malaysia
Production of SWR of the cooperating companies in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia
Kilde: Efterprøvede oplysninger fra de samarbejdsvillige producenter.
Source: Verified information provided by the cooperating producers
Produktionsmængde i tons
Production volumes given in tonnes
Malaysia (indekseret)
Malaysia (indexed)
Det samlede fald i den kinesiske eksport til Unionen fra 2006 og den sideløbende stigning i eksporten fra Republikken Korea og Malaysia og i eksporten fra Kina til Republikken Korea efter indførelsen af de oprindelige foranstaltninger og i særdeleshed frem til 2008 udgjorde en ændring i handelsmønstret mellem ovennævnte lande på den ene side og Unionen på den anden side.
The overall decrease of Chinese exports to the Union as from 2006 and the parallel increase of exports from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia and of exports from the PRC to the Republic of Korea after the imposition of the original measures and in particular until 2008 constituted a change in the pattern of trade between the abovementioned countries on the one hand and the Union on the other.
For så vidt angår Republikken Korea kunne man nå til den konklusion både samlet og, for perioden mellem 2005 og 2007, også for de ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder separat.
In the case of the Republic of Korea, this conclusion could be reached both globally and, for the period between 2005 and 2007, also separately for the non-cooperating companies.
I de modtagne bemærkninger hævdedes det, at stigningen i eksporten af koreansk SWR til Unionen var stabil over årene og ikke udviste nogen pludselig forøgelse, idet en sådan forøgelse angiveligt er en forudsætning for at fastslå en ændring i handelsmønstret.
Comments were received claiming that the increase of exports of Korean SWR to the Union was stable over the years without any sudden increase; such an increase allegedly being a precondition to establishing a change in the pattern of trade.
Det hævdedes endvidere, at stigningen snarere skulle betragtes som en naturlig udvikling i den koreanske SWR-erhvervsgren.
Furthermore, it was claimed that the increase should be regarded rather as the natural development of the Korean SWR industry.
For det første defineres en ændring i handelsmønstret ikke udelukkende som en pludselig øget import i et undersøgt land, jf. grundforordningens artikel 13.
Firstly, in accordance with Article 13 of the basic Regulation, a change in the pattern in trade is not exclusively defined as a sudden increase of imports of a country under investigation.
Dernæst har undersøgelsen vist, at den koreanske eksport til Unionen voksede betydeligt i 2006 og 2007, hvorimod de koreanske producenters produktion i de år var stabil.
Secondly, the investigation has shown that while Korean exports to the Union in 2006 and 2007 increased substantially, the output by Korean producers in those years was stable.
Det kunne derfor ikke konkluderes, at udviklingen i den koreanske eksportmængde udelukkende skyldtes den naturlige udvikling i den koreanske SWR-erhvervsgren.
It thus could not be concluded that the development of the Korean export volumes was solely due to the natural development of the Korean SWR industry.
Endelig viste for det meste modstridende tendenser mellem handelsstrømme fra Kina til Unionen og handelsstrømme fra Kina til Korea og fra Korea til Unionen siden 2006 klart en ændring i handelsmønstret mellem Unionen og tredjelande.
Finally, for the most part opposite trends between the China to Union trade flows and China to Korea and Korea to Union trade flows since 2006 clearly showed a change in the pattern of trade between the Union and third countries.
Disse påstande måtte derfor afvises.
These arguments therefore had to be rejected.
Ifølge artikel 13, stk. 1, skal ændringen i mønstret for handelen skyldes praksis, forarbejdning eller bearbejdning, for hvilken der ikke foreligger nogen tilstrækkelig gyldig grund eller økonomisk begrundelse ud over indførelsen af tolden.
Article 13(1) requires that the change in the pattern of trade stems from a practice, process or work for which there is insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty.
Ovennævnte praksis, forarbejdning eller bearbejdning omfatter blandt andet forsendelse af den af foranstaltninger omfattede vare via tredjelande og samling af dele gennem en samleproces i Unionen eller et tredjeland.
The practice, process or work includes, inter alia, the consignment of the product subject to measures via third countries and the assembly of parts by an assembly operation in the Union or a third country.
Den samlede analyse af det endelige bestemmelsessted for tovværk og kabler af stål fremstillet eller importeret til og fra Korea af samarbejdsvillige og ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder — herunder import til og fra andre lande end Kina og EU-landene — viste, at visse eksportmængder fra Korea til Unionen var import med oprindelse i Kina til Korea, for importen kom ikke fra andre tredjelande, og blev ikke produceret af indenlandske producenter i Korea.
The global analysis of the final destinations of steel ropes and cables produced or imported to and from Korea by the cooperating and non-cooperating companies — including imports to and from countries other than the PRC and the Union — showed that a certain amount of exports from Korea to the Union were Chinese-origin imports into Korea, because these imports were not sourced from other third countries or produced by the domestic producers in Korea.
Endvidere viste en sammenligning af den samlede koreanske eksport af SWR, jf. de koreanske statistikker, og de samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenters efterprøvede oplysninger om deres produktion, at koreanske producenters produktion til eksport (118856 tons) var betydelig mindre end den samlede eksport fra Korea (156440 tons) i UP.
Moreover, the comparison of the total Korean export of SWR — as recorded in Korean statistics — and the verified information of the cooperating exporting producers concerning their production showed that production destined for export by Korean producers (118856 tonnes) was significantly lower than the total exports from Korea (156440 tonnes) in the IP.
I betragtning af de koreanske virksomheders udprægede samarbejdsvilje i forbindelse med denne undersøgelse, kan denne forskel ikke forklares ved producenter, som ikke har udvist samarbejdsvilje i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
Given the high cooperation of Korean companies in this investigation, this difference cannot be explained by producers that may not have been cooperating in the investigation.
Undersøgelsen afslørede også, at visse importører i Unionen modtog SWR med oprindelse i Kina fra koreanske eksportører, der ikke samarbejdede i forbindelse med denne undersøgelse.
The investigation also revealed that some importers in the Union sourced Chinese origin SWR from Korean exporters not cooperating during the present investigation.
Disse oplysninger blev krydstjekket med koreanske handelsdatabaser, som viste, at i det mindste en del af de SWR, som blev eksporteret af disse ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder, faktisk stammede fra Kina.
This information was counter-checked with Korean trade databases which showed that at least some of the SWR exported by these non-cooperating companies was indeed sourced in China.
For så vidt angår de samarbejdsvillige virksomheder, kunne det konstateres, at ingen af dem foretog omladning af den pågældende vare via Republikken Korea i UP.
As for the cooperating companies it could be established that none of them transhipped the product concerned via the Republic of Korea in the IP.
Nogle af dem importerede SWR fra Kina, men disse blev udelukkende solgt på hjemmemarkedet og andre eksportmarkeder.
Some of them imported SWR from the PRC, but these were found to be exclusively sold on the domestic and other export markets.
Det konstateredes, at der var en virksomhed, som afgav urigtige oplysninger i sin spørgeskemabesvarelse.
In the case of one company it was found that it submitted false information in its questionnaire reply.
Endvidere blev Kommissionen under sit kontrolbesøg delvis nægtet adgang til oplysninger.
Furthermore, during the verification visit access to information was partially denied.
Derfor blev konklusionerne for denne virksomhed baseret på de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger, jf. grundforordningens artikel 18, stk. 1.
Therefore in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, findings with regard to this company were based on facts available.
Virksomheden blev underrettet om hensigten om at se bort fra de oplysninger, den havde indgivet, og blev indrømmet en tidsfrist til at fremkomme med yderligere forklaringer, jf. artikel 18, stk. 4.
In accordance with Article 18(4), the company was informed of the intention to disregard the information submitted by it and was granted a time limit to provide further explanations.
Efter fremlæggelsen af resultaterne indrømmede virksomheden, at den tidligere havde omgået foranstaltningerne ved at forfalske oprindelsen af varer indkøbt i Kina.
Subsequent to disclosure, the company admitted that it had circumvented the measures in the past by falsifying the origin of products purchased from the PRC.
På den anden side hævdede virksomheden, at den havde indgivet tilstrækkelige oplysninger om produktion, salg og indkøb i løbet af UP, som blev kontrolleret på stedet.
On the other hand the company claimed that it submitted sufficient information regarding the production, sales and purchases during the IP which was verified on-spot.
Den fremførte endvidere det argument, at det skulle være tilstrækkeligt til at konstatere, at den ikke havde omgået de gældende foranstaltninger i UP.
It further argued that this should be sufficient to determine that it had not circumvented the measures in force in the IP.
Men da virksomheden indrømmede, at den havde været involveret i omgåelse, og den tilmed forsøgte at vildlede Kommissionen i forbindelse med undersøgelsen, anses det for passende at se bort fra alle de oplysninger, som virksomheden havde indgivet, og ikke at fritage virksomheden fra de udvidede foranstaltninger, jf. betragtning 77.
However, in view of the fact that circumvention by the company admitted to have engaged in circumvention practices and furthermore tried to mislead the investigation, it is considered appropriate to disregard the entirety of the company’s submission and not to exempt this company from the extended measures, as further outlined below in recital 77.
En virksomhed underrettede som nævnt i betragtning 18 Kommissionen om, at den var gået konkurs og trak sig ud af samarbejdet.
As explained in recital 18, one company notified the Commission that it went bankrupt and withdrew its cooperation.
Som ovenfor måtte konklusionerne vedrørende denne virksomhed drages på grundlag af de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger, jf. grundforordningens artikel 18, stk. 1.
As above, findings with regard to this company had to be based on the facts available within the meaning of Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation.
Ud fra disse oplysninger konkluderedes det, at skønt det ikke kunne konstateres, at nogen af de samarbejdsvillige koreanske producenter var involveret, fandt der omladning sted i UP og i de foregående år.
On the basis of these facts it was concluded that although none of the cooperating Korean producers were found to be involved, transhipment was taking place during the IP and the preceding years.
Dette bekræftes også af konklusionerne vedrørende ændringen i handelsmønstret, jf. betragtning 39.
This is also confirmed by the findings with regard to the change of the pattern in trade as described above in recital 39.
Det skal bemærkes, at i 2007 indledte OLAF en undersøgelse af omladning af samme vare via Korea.
It has to be noted that in 2007 OLAF started an investigation into transhipment of the same product through Korea.
De koreanske myndigheder har som bekendt gennemført undersøgelser af påstået omgåelse på samme tidspunkt, og de konkluderede, at en række virksomheder, især forhandlere, begik svig ved at forfalske oprindelseslandet for SWR, der blev importeret fra Kina til Korea, ved reeksport af varen.
The Korean authorities are known to have carried out investigations into alleged circumvention practices at the same time and concluded that several companies, mainly traders, committed fraud by falsifying the origin of SWR imported from the PRC to Korea when re-exporting the product.
Derfor blev det bekræftet, at der fandt omladning sted af varer med oprindelse i Kina via republikken Korea.
The existence of transhipment of Chinese-origin products via the Republic of Korea was therefore confirmed.
Samleproces
Assembly operation
Kilderne til råmaterialer og produktionsomkostningerne blev analyseret for hver af de samarbejdsvillige virksomheder for at konstatere, om der var nogen samleproces i Republikken Korea, der udgjorde en omgåelse af foranstaltningerne, jf. kriterierne i artikel 13, stk. 2.
The sources of raw materials and the cost of production was analysed for each cooperating company in order to establish whether any assembly operation in the Republic of Korea was circumventing the measures according to the criteria of Article 13(2).
I alle tilfælde udgjorde det kinesiske råmateriale (valsetråd eller halvfabrikata) ikke mindst 60 % af den samlede værdi af de dele, der indgår i den samlede vare.
In all cases the Chinese-origin raw material (wire rod or semi finished product) did not constitute 60 % or more of the total value of the parts of the final product.
Derfor var det ikke nødvendigt at undersøge, om tærsklen på 25 % for værditilvæksten var nået eller ej.
It was therefore not necessary to examine whether or not the 25 % threshold of value added was reached or not.
Undersøgelsen viste, at ingen af de samarbejdsvillige producenter i Malaysia importerede den pågældende vare fra Kina i UP.
The investigation established that none of the cooperating producers in Malaysia imported the product concerned from China during the IP.
Ud fra de samarbejdsvillige virksomheders andel af eksporten til Unionen i forhold til den samlede eksport fra Malaysia til Unionen, jf. Comext, kunne det konkluderes, at den voksende import fra Malaysia, jf. statistikkerne, fuldt ud kan forklares ved de samarbejdsvillige virksomheders øgede eksport.
Based on the share of the exports by the cooperating companies to the Union within the total exports from Malaysia to the Union as recorded in Comext, it could be concluded that the increase of imports from Malaysia shown in the statistics can be explained fully by the increase of the cooperating companies’ exports.
Denne konklusion underbygges af de egentlige malaysiske producenters samlede produktionsmængde i samme periode, jf. betragtning 38.
This conclusion is reinforced by the increase of the total production volume of the genuine Malaysian producers during the same period as described in recital 38.
Ansøgeren satte spørgsmålstegn ved disse resultater, dog uden at fremsætte yderligere begrundelser eller belæg.
The applicant questioned this finding without providing any further reason or evidence.
Kilderne til råmaterialer og produktionsomkostningerne blev analyseret for hver af de samarbejdsvillige virksomheder for at konstatere, om der er nogen samleproces i Malaysia, der udgør en omgåelse af foranstaltningerne, jf. kriterierne i artikel 13, stk. 2.
The sources of raw materials and the cost of production was analysed for each cooperating company to establish whether any assembly operation in Malaysia is circumventing the measures according to the criteria of Article 13(2).
Derfor var det ikke nødvendigt at undersøge, om tærsklen på 25 % for værditilvæksten var nået eller ej.
It was not necessary, therefore, to examine whether or not the 25 % threshold of value added was reached.
Det kunne derfor konkluderes, at den iagttagne ændring i handelsmønstret mellem Kina, Malaysia og Unionen ikke skyldtes omgåelse i Malaysia.
It could therefore be concluded that the change in the pattern of trade observed between the PRC, Malaysia and the Union did not stem from circumvention practices in Malaysia.
Derfor bør undersøgelsen vedrørende import af SWR afsendt fra Malaysia afsluttes.
Consequently, the investigation concerning imports of SWR consigned from Malaysia should be terminated.
Utilstrækkelig gyldig grund eller økonomisk begrundelse ud over indførelsen af antidumpingtolden (Republikken Korea)
Insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the anti-dumping duty (Republic of Korea)
Undersøgelsen bragte ikke nogen anden gyldig grund eller økonomisk begrundelse for omladning end unddragelse af den gældende antidumpingtold på SWR med oprindelse i Kina frem i lyset.
The investigation did not bring to light any other due cause or economic justification for the transhipment than the avoidance of the anti-dumping duty in force on SWR originating in China.
Undergravning af antidumpingtoldens afhjælpende virkninger (ikke-samarbejdsvillige koreanske virksomheder)
Undermining of the remedial effect of the anti-dumping duty (non-cooperating Korean companies)
For at vurdere, hvorvidt de importerede varer, for så vidt angår mængder og priser, havde undergravet de afhjælpende virkninger af de gældende foranstaltninger over for SWR fra Kina, blev der anvendt Comext-data som de bedste tilgængelige data vedrørende ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheders eksportmængder og -priser.
To assess whether the imported products had, in terms of quantities and prices, undermined the remedial effects of the measures in force on imports of SWR from China, Comext data was used as the best data available concerning quantities and prices of exports by non-cooperating companies.
De således fastsatte priser blev sammenlignet med den skadestærskel, der var blevet fastsat for EU-producenterne i udløbsundersøgelsen.
The prices so determined were compared to the injury elimination level established for Union producers in the expiry review.
Stigningen i importen fra Korea blev mængdemæssigt betragtet som betydelig ud fra størrelsen af markedet som fastlagt i udløbsundersøgelsen (betragtning 99 i forordning (EF) nr. 1858/2005).
The increase of imports from Korea was considered to be significant in terms of quantities bearing in mind the size of the market as determined in the expiry review (recital 99 of Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005).
Det anslåede EU-forbrug i den nuværende undersøgelsesperiode giver en lignende indikation af denne imports omfang.
The estimated Union consumption in the current investigation period gives a similar indication about the significance of these imports.
Sammenligningen af skadestærsklen som fastsat i udløbsundersøgelsen og den vejede gennemsnitlige eksportpris viste betydeligt underbud.
The comparison of the injury elimination level as established in the expiry review and the weighted average export price showed significant underselling.
Det konkluderedes derfor, at foranstaltningerne undergraves, for så vidt angår mængde og priser.
It was therefore concluded that the measures are being undermined in terms of quantities and prices.
Bevis for dumping (ikke-samarbejdsvillige koreanske virksomheder)
Evidence of dumping (non-cooperating Korean companies)
Endelig blev det i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 13, stk. 1 og 2, undersøgt, om der var bevis for dumping i forhold til den tidligere fastslåede normale værdi for samme eller lignende varer.
Finally, in accordance with Article 13(1) and (2) of the basic Regulation it was examined whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal value previously established for the like or similar products.
I udløbsundersøgelsen blev den normale værdi fastsat på grundlag af priser i Tyrkiet, der i forbindelse med den undersøgelse fandtes at være et passende markedsøkonomisk referenceland for Kina.
In the expiry review the normal value was established on the basis of prices in Turkey, which in that investigation was found to be an appropriate market economy analogue country for the PRC.
I løbet af den nuværende undersøgelse blev det konstateret, at prisen på valsetråd, som er det vigtigste input i produktionen af SWR, var vokset betydeligt siden udløbsundersøgelsen.
In the present investigation, it was established that the price of wire rod, the main input used in the production of SWR increased significantly since the expiry review.
I betragtning af, at prisudviklingen på råmaterialer afspejledes i eksportprisen i løbet af UP, blev det derfor endvidere anset for hensigtsmæssigt at opdatere den tidligere fastslåede normale værdi i overensstemmelse med prisudviklingen på råmaterialer.
In addition, considering that the price developments of the raw materials were reflected in the export price during the IP, it was therefore deemed appropriate to up date the normal value as previously established by the development of raw material prices.
Det konstateredes, at en betydelig del af den koreanske eksport var egentlig koreansk produktion.
A significant part of Korean exports were found to be genuine Korean production.
For at fastsætte eksportpriserne fra Republikken Korea, som er påvirket af omgåelse, var det derfor kun de ikke-samarbejdsvillige producenters/eksportørers eksport, der blevet taget i betragtning, som byggede på de bedste foreliggende oplysninger, dvs. på den gennemsnitlige eksportpris på SWR i UP, jf. Comext.
For this reason, in order to establish the export prices from the Republic of Korea which are affected by circumvention, only the exports of the non-cooperating producers/exporters was considered which was based on best facts available, i.e. on the average export price of SWR during the IP as reported in Comext.
For at sikre en rimelig sammenligning mellem den normale værdi og eksportprisen blev der i form af justeringer taget behørigt hensyn til forskelle, der påvirker priserne og prissammenligneligheden, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10.
For the purpose of a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance, in the form of adjustments, was made for differences which affect prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Følgelig blev der foretaget justeringer for forskelle i indirekte afgifter, transport- og forsikringsomkostninger ud fra de gennemsnitlige omkostninger for de samarbejdsvillige koreanske eksportører i UP.
Accordingly, adjustments were made for differences in indirect taxes, transport and insurance costs based on the average costs of the cooperating Korean producers/exporters in the IP.
Dumpingmargenen blev i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 11 og 12, beregnet ved at sammenligne den vejede gennemsnitlige normale værdi som fastsat i udløbsundersøgelsen og de vejede gennemsnitlige eksportpriser i denne undersøgelses UP, udtrykt i procent af cif-prisen, Unionens grænse, ufortoldet.
In accordance with Articles 2(11) and 2(12) of the basic Regulation, dumping was calculated by comparing the weighted average normal value as established in the expiry review and the weighted average export prices during this investigation’s IP, expressed as a percentage of the CIF price at the Union frontier duty unpaid.
Det fremgik af sammenligningen mellem den vejede gennemsnitlige normale værdi og den vejede gennemsnitlige eksportpris, at der fandt dumping sted.
The comparison of the weighted average normal value and the weighted average export prices so established showed dumping.
I betragtning af ovenstående konkluderedes det, at den endelige antidumpingtold på importen af SWR med oprindelse i Kina blev omgået ved omladning via Republikken Korea, jf. grundforordningens artikel 13, stk. 1.
Given the above, it was concluded that the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of SWR originating in China was circumvented by transhipment via the Republic of Korea pursuant to Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.