natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Virksomheden var for det andet ikke uenig i udviklingen i stålpriserne som sådan, men påstod dog, at de kinesiske råvarepriser lå på linje med priserne i andre lande, og at den pris, som Since Hardware havde betalt på de kinesiske marked, lå langt over priserne på en række andre stålmarkeder i lande med markedsøkonomi i resten af verden.
Second, although Since Hardware did not disagree with the evolution of steel prices as such, it claimed that the Chinese raw material prices were still in line with prices in other countries and that the price paid by Since Hardware on the Chinese market was above the prices of several steel markets in market-economy countries world-wide.
Since Hardware fremførte, at priserne på andre internationale markeder, som f.eks. de tyrkiske og ukrainske eksportpriser også var tilgængelige, og at de var lavere end hjemmemarkedspriserne i Kina.
Since Hardware stated that prices of other international markets such as the Turkish or Ukrainian export prices would also be available, and that these were lower than the domestic prices in the PRC.
For det tredje påstod Since Hardware, at en virksomhed, som er aktiv i en erhvervsgren (strygebrætter) ikke kunne nægtes markedsøkonomisk behandling som følge af en række forhold, der udelukkende vedrører en anden erhvervsgren (stål), og at Kommissionen ikke kunne udligne subsidier i leverandørindustrien ved at afslå markedsøkonomisk behandling på afsætningsmarkedet.
Third, Since Hardware argued that MET could not be denied to a company active in one industry (ironing boards) for factors relating exclusively to another industry (steel) and that the Commission could not offset subsidies in the upstream market through the rejection of a MET claim in the downstream market.
Since Hardware påstod desuden, at det for en lille strygebræt-virksomhed var en urimelig byrde at skulle fremlægge bevis for, at den kinesiske stålindustri ikke er subsidieret.
Moreover, Since Hardware claimed that it was an unreasonable burden of proof to require a small ironing boards company to provide evidence that the Chinese steel industry is not subsidised.
Hvad angår Since Hardwares første påstand, skal det bemærkes, at der i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra c), træffes afgørelse om, hvorvidt Since Hardware opfylder de fem relevante kriterier, og denne afgørelse er gyldig under hele undersøgelsesforløbet.
Concerning the first argument of Since Hardware, it is noted that pursuant to Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, a determination whether Since Hardware meets the five relevant criteria shall be made and this determination shall remain in force throughout the investigation.
Da denne undersøgelse er begrænset til én eksporterende producent, efterprøvede Kommissionen anmodningen om markedsøkonomisk behandling og antidumping-spørgeskemaet samtidig i forbindelse med det samme kontrolbesøg hos virksomheden.
As the present investigation is limited to one exporting producer, the Commission verified the MET claim and the anti-dumping questionnaire reply at the same time, in the framework of the same on-spot investigation.
Anmodningen om markedsøkonomisk behandling blev behandlet alene uafhængigt af, hvilke virkninger den måtte få for beregningen af dumpingmargenen.
The MET claim was investigated on its own merits and irrespective of the effects which it might have on the calculation of the dumping margin.
Der kunne nemlig ikke foretages detaljerede dumpingberegninger for Since Hardware, før der forelå en afgørelse om markedsøkonomisk behandling, idet der ikke forelå oplysninger fra et egnet land med markedsøkonomi.
In fact, detailed dumping calculations for Since Hardware could not be made before the MET determination in the absence of data from an appropriate market economy country.
Dette er således ikke i strid med grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra c).
Hence there was no breach of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Vedrørende Since Hardwares anden påstand bekræfter undersøgelsen, at denne udligning mellem de kinesiske priser og de internationale markedspriser også skyldtes statslig indgriben, selv om prisforskellen mindskedes i anden halvdel af UP og praktisk taget var udlignet ved udløbet af UP.
Concerning the second claim of Since Hardware, the investigation revealed that although the price difference diminished in the second half of the IP and was practically eliminated at the end of the IP, it is maintained that this alignment of Chinese prices to international market prices was also the result of State intervention.
Da priserne på de internationale stålmarkeder styrtdykkede i 2009 som følge af den finansielle og økonomiske krise, ophævede staten den eksportafgift, der var blevet indført tidligere, og gav dermed mulighed for en udligning mellem de hjemlige priser og de internationale priser uden fare for en betydelig prisstigning på disse vigtige råvarer på hjemmemarkedet.
Indeed, in 2009, when prices on international steel markets had plummeted due to the financial and economic crises, the State abolished the export taxes previously imposed, thereby allowing for an alignment of domestic prices with international prices without the danger of a significant price increase for these important raw materials on the domestic market.
Dette viser, at markedet for de råvarer, der er nødvendige til at producere den pågældende vare, fortsat også var genstand for statslig indgriben i anden halvdel af UP.
This shows that the market for the raw materials necessary to produce the product concerned continued to be the subject of State intervention also in the second half of the IP.
Det bemærkes, at de yderligere prisoplysninger, som Since Hardware fremkom med, understøttede konklusionerne om, at de vigtigste råvarer til fremstillingen af strygebrætter i første halvdel af UP i gennemsnit var væsentlig billigere på det kinesiske hjemmemarked end på andre betydelige markeder i verden.
It is noted that the additional price information submitted by Since Hardware supported the finding that the main raw materials for the production of ironing boards in the first half of the IP were on average significantly cheaper on the Chinese domestic market than on other sizeable world markets.
Der blev foretaget en sammenligning mellem stålpriserne på det kinesiske hjemmemarked og hjemmemarkedspriserne på andre markeder, som kan sammenlignes med det kinesiske marked, hvad angår størrelsen (EU, USA og Canada), da der på disse markeder er et stort forbrug af stål og en række aktive producenter.
A comparison was made between Chinese domestic steel prices and domestic prices on other markets which are comparable to the Chinese market in terms of volume (EU, USA and Canada) as they have a high consumption of steel and there are several active producers.
Andre markeder, som blev foreslået af Since Hardware, såsom Tyrkiet og Ukraine (hjemmemarked og eksportmarked) blev ikke fundet repræsentative, hvad angår størrelsen og/eller antallet af producenter af disse særlige råvarer, og kunne dermed ikke sammenlignes med det kinesiske hjemmemarked.
Other markets suggested by Since Hardware such as Turkey and Ukraine (domestic and export markets) have not been found to be representative in terms of size and/or number of producers of these particular raw materials and thus not comparable to the Chinese domestic market.
Det skal desuden erindres, at den virksomhed, der anmoder om markedsøkonomisk behandling iflg. grundforordningen har bevisbyrden og altså skal bevise, at den opfylder de relevante kriterier.
It is also recalled that the basic Regulation puts the burden of proof on the company that claims MET to demonstrate that it fulfils the relevant criteria.
Da Kommissionen konstaterede en række elementer, der peger i retning af, at udgifterne til de vigtigste input ikke afspejler markedsværdierne, skal virksomheden fremlægge oplysninger, der kan afvise dette.
As the Commission established a number of elements pointing to the cost of major inputs not reflecting market values, it is consequently for the company to come up with elements that would refute this.
Desuden gives der i grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra c), udtrykkeligt mulighed for at undersøge, om virksomheders beslutninger vedrørende bl.a. inputs træffes som reaktion på markedssignaler, der afspejler udbuds- og efterspørgselsforholdene, og uden nogen omfattende statslig indgriben, og om udgifterne til de vigtigste inputs i alt væsentligt afspejler markedsværdierne.
Furthermore, the basic Regulation in Article 2(7)(c) provides explicitly for the possibility to examine whether decisions of firms regarding, inter alia, inputs are made in response to market signals reflecting supply and demand and without significant State interference and whether costs of major inputs substantially reflect market values.
Hvis en virksomhed ikke opfylder ovennævnte betingelser, kan Kommissionen afslå markedsøkonomisk behandling.
Consequently, if a company does not fulfil these conditions, as outlined above, MET can be refused.
Det skal også bemærkes, at Since Hardware importerede sine råvarer i den første undersøgelse, men senere besluttede at købe råvarerne på det kinesiske hjemmemarked på grund af de lavere priser på det kinesiske marked.
It is also noted that Since Hardware used to import its raw materials during the first investigation but switched to Chinese sourcing due to lower prices on the Chinese market.
Hvad angår de konstaterede regnskabsspørgsmål, påstod Since Hardware, at de ikke vedrørte Since Hardwares regnskaber og i øvrigt ikke betød, at virksomheden ikke opfylder de internationale regnskabsstandarder.
With regard to the identified accounting issues, Since Hardware claimed that they did not relate to Since Hardware’s accounts and, in any event, did not mean that the company did not fully comply with international accounting standards.
Since Hardware påstod desuden, at den pågældende regnskabsfejl var uden betydning.
Since Hardware also claimed that the accounting mistake identified was immaterial.
Selv om kinesiske virksomheder i henhold til lokal lovgivning eventuelt ikke skal følge visse regnskabsstandarder, har dette ingen indflydelse på, om deres regnskaber skal gennemgås i henhold til disse standarder i forbindelse med en beslutning om markedsøkonomisk behandling.
The fact that the Chinese companies may not be subject under their domestic law to comply with certain accounting standards has no bearing on whether their accounts may be assessed in the light of those standards for the purpose of a MET determination.
Præsentation af regnskaber er et grundlæggende IAS-princip, og det er virksomhedens opgave at bevise, at eventuelle brud på disse standarder ikke udgør et brud på det andet kriterium i grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra c).
The fair presentation of financial statements is a basic IAS and it is up to the company to show that any infringement of those standards does not constitute a breach of the second criterion of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Dette er ikke sket hverken for den pågældende transaktion eller den fejlagtige bogføring.
This has not been done either for the transaction in question or the wrong booking.
Sidstnævnte kan under ingen omstændigheder betragtes som ubetydelig, da der er tale om en væsentlig procentdel af den samlede eksport til Unionen i undersøgelsesperioden.
In any event, the latter cannot be considered as immaterial as represents a sizeable percentage of total exports to the Union in the investigation period.
Det konkluderes, at ingen af Since Hardwares argumenter førte til en anden vurdering af konklusionerne.
To conclude, none of the arguments raised by Since Hardware were such as to lead to a different assessment of the findings.
På grundlag af ovenstående bekræftes resultaterne samt den konklusion, at Since Hardware ikke bør indrømmes markedsøkonomisk behandling.
On the basis of the above, the findings and the conclusion that MET should not be granted to Since Hardware were confirmed.
Det konkluderes således endeligt, at Since Hardware ikke indrømmes markedsøkonomisk behandling.
It is thus definitively concluded that MET should not be granted to Since Hardware.
Størstedelen af aktierne tilhører private; Statslige tjenestemænd i bestyrelsen eller i ledende stillinger skal være i klart mindretal, eller det skal påvises, at virksomheden er tilstrækkeligt uafhængig af statslig indgriben. Valutaomregninger foretages til markedskursen.
the majority of the shares belong to private persons; State officials appearing on the board of directors or holding key management positions shall either be in minority or it must be demonstrated that the company is nonetheless sufficiently independent from State interference;
Ud over den markedsøkonomiske behandling anmodede Since Hardware også om individuel behandling for det tilfælde, at virksomheden ikke blev indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling.
Since Hardware, as well as requesting MET, also claimed IT in the event of it not being granted MET.
Undersøgelsen viste, at Since Hardware opfyldte alle ovennævnte kriterier, og det konkluderes, at Since Hardware bør indrømmes individuel behandling.
The investigation showed that Since Hardware met all the above criteria and it is concluded that IT should be granted to Since Hardware.
I henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, skal den normale værdi i tilfælde af import fra lande uden markedsøkonomi og — i det omfang, der ikke kan indrømmes markedsøkonomisk behandling — lande som anført i grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra b), fastsættes på grundlag af prisen eller den beregnede værdi i et tredjeland med markedsøkonomi (referenceland).
According to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, in case of imports from non-market-economy countries and to the extent that MET could not be granted, for countries specified in Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, normal value has to be established on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country (analogue country).
I indledningsmeddelelsen tilkendegav Kommissionen, at den påtænkte at benytte Amerikas Forenede Stater (»USA«) som referenceland med henblik på at fastsætte den normale værdi for Kina, men ingen producenter fra USA samarbejdede i undersøgelsen.
In the notice of initiation, the Commission indicated its intention to use the United States of America (‘USA’) as an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for the PRC, but no producer from the USA cooperated in the investigation.
Derefter henvendte Kommissionen sig til tyrkiske og ukrainske virksomheder, men disse ønskede heller ikke at samarbejde.
Subsequently, Turkish and Ukrainian companies were also approached but there was no cooperation from them either.
Da ingen producenter fra tredjelande samarbejdede, henvendte Kommissionen sig på grundlag af grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra a), til EU-producenterne, og en af dem samarbejdede.
As no third country producer cooperated, Union producers were approached on the basis of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation and one of them cooperated.
Since Hardware indsendte ingen kommentarer til anvendelsen af de oplysninger, som EU-erhvervsgrenen havde afgivet med henblik på at fastsætte den normale værdi.
No comments on using the information obtained from a Union producer for establishment of normal value were received from Since Hardware.
Den normale værdi blev således fastsat i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra a), på grundlag af efterprøvede oplysninger fra den samarbejdsvillige EU-producent.
Thus, the normal value was established pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation on the basis of verified information received from the cooperating Union producer.
EU-producentens hjemmemarkedssalg af samme vare blev anset for at være repræsentativt udtrykt i mængde sammenlignet med den pågældende vare eksporteret til EU af Since Hardware.
The domestic sales of the Union producer of the like product were found to be representative in terms of volume when compared to the product concerned exported to the Union by Since Hardware.
I henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra a), blev den normale værdi for Since Hardware fastsat ud fra de efterprøvede oplysninger, som den eneste samarbejdsvillige EU-producent indsendte, dvs. på grundlag af de priser, der er betalt eller skal betales på EU-markedet for sammenlignelige varetyper, da salget blev anset for at have fundet sted i normal handel, eller på grundlag af den beregnede normale værdi, når der ikke er konstateret noget hjemmemarkedssalg i normal handel for sammenlignelige varetyper, dvs. ud fra omkostningerne ved fremstilling af strygebrætter, der er produceret af EU-producenten, plus et rimeligt beløb til dækning af salgs-, general- og administrationsomkostninger (i det følgende benævnt »SG&A-omkostninger«) og til fortjeneste.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for Since Hardware was established on the basis of verified information received from the sole cooperating Union producer, i.e. on the basis of prices paid or payable on the Union market for comparable product types, where these were found to be made in the ordinary course of trade, or on constructed values, where no domestic sales in the ordinary course of trade for comparable product types were found, i.e. on the basis of the cost of manufacturing of ironing boards manufactured by the Union producer plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses and for profit.
Den anvendte fortjenstmargen er i tråd med den, der blev anvendt i den første undersøgelse.
The profit margin used is in line with the one used in the first investigation.
Den pågældende vare blev i alle tilfælde solgt direkte til eksport til uafhængige kunder i Unionen, og derfor blev eksportprisen fastsat i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 8, nemlig på grundlag af den pris, der faktisk er betalt eller skal betales for varen, når den sælges til eksport til Unionen.
In all cases the product concerned was directly sold for export to independent customers in the Union, and therefore, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of prices actually paid or payable for the product when sold for export to the Union.
På dette grundlag blev der foretaget justeringer for transportudgifter, omkostninger til forsikring og håndtering, kreditomkostninger og indirekte skatter, når dette var relevant og berettiget.
On this basis, allowances for transport costs, insurance, handling charges, credit costs and indirect taxes were made where applicable and justified.
Det blev konstateret, at Since Hardware dumpingmargen udtrykt i procent af nettoprisen, frit Unionens grænse, var på 51,7 %.
The dumping margin of Since Hardware as a percentage of the net, free-at-Union-frontier price was found to be 51,7 %.
Særlige forhold ved denne undersøgelse
Specificities of this investigation
Undersøgelsen af den væsentlige skade, der forvoldtes EU-erhvervsgrenen, baseres normalt på den samlede dumpingimport fra et eller flere eksportlande, jf. grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 2.
The examination of material injury suffered by the Union industry is normally based on all dumped imports originating in one or more exporting countries, in accordance with Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation.
I dette tilfælde blev der dog allerede foretaget en fuldstændig skadesanalyse for så vidt angår den samlede import af strygebrætter med oprindelse i bl.a. Kina som led i den første undersøgelse.
However, in this case, a full analysis of injury in respect of all imports of ironing boards originating, inter alia, in the PRC was already carried out in the framework of the first investigation.
I den undersøgelse konstaterede Kommissionen, at dumpingimporten af strygebrætter med oprindelige i bl.a. Kina havde forvoldt EU-erhvervsgrenen væsentlig skade.
Indeed, in that investigation the Commission established that dumped imports of ironing boards originating, inter alia, in the PRC had caused material injury to the Union industry.
Disse konklusioner blev nået i henhold til bestemmelser i grundforordningens artikel 3 og var baseret på en analyse af virkningerne af den samlede dumpingimport med oprindelse i Kina og Ukraine, med undtagelse dog af importen af strygebrætter produceret af Since Hardware, som iflg. undersøgelsen ikke havde solgt til dumpingpriser.
These findings, made in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of the basic Regulation, were based on an assessment of the effects of all imports originating in the PRC and Ukraine, with the sole exclusion of imports of ironing boards produced by Since Hardware which had been found to be sold at non-dumped prices.
Importen fra de to lande i UP blev efterfølgende pålagt en antidumpingtold (kun Since Hardware blev pålagt en nultold).
As a result, during the IP, anti-dumping duties were applicable to all imports from those countries (only Since Hardware was subject to a zero duty).
Da EU-erhvervsgrenen allerede var beskyttet mod de skadelige virkninger af denne import i UP, var det ikke muligt at gennemføre en normal skadesanalyse.
As the Union industry was already protected against the harmful effects of these imports during the IP, it was impossible to perform a normal full injury analysis.
Der blev derfor anvendt en særlig tilgang, som er tilpasset de særlige forhold i denne undersøgelse, hvor institutionerne fokuserede på særlige skadesindikatorer.
Therefore, a specific approach was developed, adapted to the specificities of this investigation, in which the Institutions focused on particular injury indicators.
De oplysninger, EU-erhvervsgrenen blev anmodet om at fremlægge, vedrørte især spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt Since Hardware havde underbudt EU-erhvervsgrenens priser, og prisernes rentabilitetsniveau.
The information requested from the Union industry focused on whether Since Hardware had been undercutting its prices and on what was the profitability of those prices.
EU-erhvervsgrenen blev desuden anmodet om at fremlægge alle andre oplysninger, der kunne antyde, at Since Hardwares eksport til Unionen havde forvoldt EU-erhvervsgrenen skade.
Furthermore, the Union industry was invited to provide any other information that, in its view, indicated that Since Hardware’s exports to the Union had caused it injury.
I den forbindelse undersøgte Kommissionen i) udviklingen i dumpingimporten af strygebrætter produceret af Since Hardware; ii) om importen var foretaget til priser, der underbød EU-erhvervsgrenens salgspriser, og rentabiliteten af EU-erhvervsgrenens priser; og iii) andre oplysninger fra EU-erhvervsgrenen, der antydede, at Since Hardwares eksport til Unionen havde forvoldt erhvervsgrenen skade, f.eks. vedrørende EU-erhvervsgrenens tab af kunder og ordrer til Since Hardware og rentabiliteten af EU-erhvervsgrenens EU-salg i UP.
In this context, the Commission examined i) the development of dumped imports of ironing boards produced by Since Hardware; ii) whether those imports had been made at prices undercutting the sales prices of the Union industry and what was the profitability of the Union industry prices; and iii) any information provided by the Union industry indicating that Since Hardware’s exports to the Union had caused it injury, e.g. concerning the Union industry’s losses of customers and orders to Since Hardware and the profitability of their Union sales during the IP.
Klagen blev indgivet af tre EU-producenter, der tegner sig for en væsentlig del af den samlede EU-produktion af strygebrætter, dvs. i dette tilfælde ca. 40 % af den anslåede EU-produktion.
The complaint was lodged by three Union producers representing a major proportion of the total known Union production of ironing boards, i.e. in this case approximately 40 % of the estimated Union production.
Ingen af de andre EU-producenter modsatte sig indledningen af denne undersøgelse.
None of the other Union producers opposed the initiation of the present proceeding.