natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Asia Pulp & Paper Italia SRL, Padova, Italien
Asia Pulp & Paper Italia SRL, Padova, Italy.
Importører i EU:
Importers in the Union
Cartaria Subalpina, Torino, Italien
Cartaria Subalpina, Turin, Italy,
Middleton Paper, Walsall, Det Forenede Kongerige
Middleton Paper, Walsall, UK,
Paperlinx, Northampton, Det Forenede Kongerige.
Paperlinx, Northampton, UK.
Da det var nødvendigt at fastsætte en normal værdi for den eksporterende producent i Kina, for hvilken der ikke blev anvendt markedsøkonomisk behandling, blev der aflagt kontrolbesøg hos følgende virksomhed med henblik på fastsættelse af en normal værdi på grundlag af oplysningerne fra et referenceland, i dette tilfælde USA:
In view of the need to establish a normal value for the exporting producer in the PRC in the absence of MET, a verification visit to establish normal value on the basis of data from an analogue country, the USA in this case, took place at the premises of the following company:
Undersøgelsen af dumping og skade omfattede perioden fra 1. januar 2009 til 31. december 2009 (»undersøgelsesperioden« eller »UP«).
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009 (the ‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Undersøgelsen af udviklingstendenser af relevans for vurderingen af skade omfattede perioden fra 1. januar 2006 til udgangen af undersøgelsesperioden (»den betragtede periode«).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2006 to the end of the IP (the period considered).
Den pågældende vare er coated finpapir, som er papir eller pap, der er coated på den ene side eller begge sider (undtagen kraftpapir eller kraftpap), i enten ark eller ruller og med en vægt på 70 g/m2 eller derover, dog højst 400 g/m2, og med en glans på mere end 84 (målt i henhold til ISO 2470-1), med oprindelse i Kina (»den pågældende vare«), som i øjeblikket hører under KN-kode ex48101320, ex48101380, ex48101420, ex48101480, ex48101910, ex48101990, ex48102210, ex48102290, ex48102930, ex48102980, ex48109910, ex48109930 og ex48109990.
The product concerned is coated fine paper which is paper or paperboard coated on one or both sides (excluding kraft paper or kraft paperboard), in either sheets or rolls, and with a weight of 70 g/m2 or more but not exceeding 400 g/m2 and brightness of more than 84 (measured according to ISO 2470-1), originating in the PRC (‘the product concerned’ or ‘CFP’) currently falling within CN codes ex48101320, ex48101380, ex48101420, ex48101480, ex48101910, ex48101990, ex48102210, ex48102290, ex48102930, ex48102980, ex48109910, ex48109930 and ex48109990.
Den pågældende vare er papir og karton af høj kvalitet, der normalt anvendes til trykning af læsestof som f.eks. tidsskrifter, kataloger, årsberetninger og årbøger.
CFP is high quality paper and paperboard generally used for printing of reading material such as magazines, catalogues, annual reports, yearbooks.
Den pågældende vare omfatter både ark og ruller, som er egnet til brug i fladtrykspresser.
The product concerned includes both sheets and rolls suitable for use in sheet-fed (cut star) printing machines.
Ruller, der er egnet til brug i fladtrykspresser (»arkruller«), er beregnet til at blive skåret op inden trykningen og anses derfor for substituerbare og i direkte konkurrence med ark.
Rolls suitable for use in sheet-fed presses (cutter rolls) are designed to be cut into pieces before printing, and are thus considered to be substitutable and directly competitive with sheets.
Den pågældende vare omfatter ikke ruller, der kan anvendes i rotationspresser.
The product concerned does not include rolls suitable for use in web-fed presses.
Ruller, der kan anvendes i rotationspresser, defineres som ruller, der, når de testes i henhold til ISO-testen ISO-standard 3783:2006 om fastlæggelse af papirets rivefasthed — en metode med accelereret hastighed med anvendelse af IGT-testeren (elektronisk model), giver et resultat på under 30 N/m ved måling i papirets tværsnit og et resultat på under 50 N/m ved måling i løberetningen.
Rolls suitable for use in web-fed presses are defined as those rolls which, if tested according to the ISO test standard ISO 3783:2006 concerning the determination of resistance to picking – accelerated speed method using the IGT tester (electric model), give a result of less than 30 N/m when measuring in the cross-direction of the paper (CD) and a result of less than 50 N/m when measuring in the machine direction (MD).
I modsætning til ruller, der anvendes i fladtrykspresser, fødes ruller til rotationspresser normalt direkte ind i trykkemaskinerne og skæres ikke op på forhånd.
Also, in contrast to rolls used in sheet-fed printing machines, rolls for use in web-fed presses are normally directly fed into the printing machines and are not cut beforehand.
En part hævdede, at det undersøgte produktområde var for snævert defineret, og at ruller af coated finpapir, som er egnet til rotationstryk, skulle have været medtaget.
One party claimed that the product scope of the investigation was too narrowly defined and that rolls of CFP suitable for web-fed printing should have been included.
Man hævdede, at ruller til rotationstryk og rullerne, der er omfattet af denne undersøgelse (arkruller og ark), har de samme grundlæggende tekniske og fysiske egenskaber og kan ikke skelnes fra hinanden.
It was claimed that web-fed rolls and the ones included in the scope of the present investigation (cutter rolls and sheets) shared the same basic technical and physical characteristics and were not distinguishable from one another.
Man hævdede desuden, at begge anvendes til trykning af høj kvalitet, og at de derfor i et vist omfang er substituerbare.
Furthermore it was claimed that both were used for high quality printing and that they were therefore to some extent interchangeable.
Men i modsætning til ovenstående påstand bekræftede undersøgelsen, at der er klare tekniske og fysiske forskelle, f.eks. på vandindhold og stivhed, mellem papir til rullerotationstryk og ruller til fladtrykspresser.
However, in contrast to the above claim the investigation confirmed that there are indeed distinct technical and physical characteristics such as humidity and stiffness between paper used in web-fed and the one used in sheet-fed printing.
Undersøgelsen bekræftede endvidere, at de tekniske egenskaber under betragtning 16 ovenfor er specielle for ruller, der egner sig til brug i rullerotationspresser.
The investigation further confirmed that the technical characteristics listed in recital 16 above are unique to rolls suitable for use in web-fed presses.
Som følge af disse forskelle kan papir, der bruges i rullerotationspresser og papir til fladtrykspresser, ikke bruges i samme type trykpresse, og derfor er de ikke substituerbare.
Due to these differences paper used in web-fed or the one used in sheet-fed printing cannot be used in the same type of printing machine and they are therefore not interchangeable.
Det bemærkes, at alle parter var enige om, at de to typer papir er forskellige for så vidt angår overfladestyrke og trækstyrke.
It is noted that all parties agreed that the two types of paper are distinct as regards their surface strength and tensile strength.
Desuden hævdede den pågældende part, at kunderne betragter coated finpapir i form af ark, arkruller og ruller til rotationstryk som ét marked, og derfor er distributionskanalerne de samme.
Furthermore, the party in question claimed that customers view CFP in the form of sheets, cutter rolls and web rolls as a single market and thus distribution channels are the same.
De forskellige tekniske egenskaber afspejler sig kun i mindre prisforskelle mellem disse varegrupper.
The different technical characteristics are only reflected in minor price differences among these product groups.
Undersøgelsen viste dog, at de to typer af ruller heller ikke er substituerbare ud fra et økonomisk synspunkt, idet ruller til rotationstryk bruges til trykopgaver med stor volumen og normalt laves efter ordre og kræver »just-in-time«-levering, og derfor ligger disse produkter ikke på lager hos mellemmænd, men sendes direkte til slutbrugerne, dvs. de sælges også gennem en anden distributionskanal end ruller, der bruges til fladtrykspresser.
However, the investigation revealed that the two types of rolls are also non-interchangeable from an economic point of view because rolls for web-fed printing are used for mass-volume printing jobs and are generally made to order and require just-in-time delivery therefore these products are not stocked by intermediaries but are shipped directly to the final users, i.e. they are also sold through a different distribution channel than rolls used in sheet-fed printing.
Den anderledes produktionsproces og den anderledes stordriftsfordel ved trykningsprocessen afspejler sig i tydelige prisforskelle.
The different production process and the different economies of scale in the printing process are reflected in distinct price differences.
På dette grundlag blev disse påstande afvist.
On this basis, these claims were rejected.
Den samme part hævdede, at rivefastheden ikke var en egnet teknisk egenskab til at skelne mellem varerne, for testen ville være af generel art, og endvidere kan testresultaterne blive påvirket af det testede papirs vandindhold.
The same party claimed that the resistance to picking was not a suitable technical characteristic for differentiating between products as this test would be of a general nature and test results may moreover be affected by the moisture content of the paper tested.
Parten hævdede endvidere, at det af visse andre test af en stikprøve af coated finpapir til rotationstryk (herunder varer produceret af EU-erhvervsgrenen) fremgår, at varerne ikke ville svare til den nuværende varedefinition, hvilket ville vise, at kriteriet »rivefasthed« ikke er egnet til at skelne mellem coated finpapir til brug i henholdsvis rotationspresser og fladtrykspresser.
The party further claimed that on the basis of some other tests undertaken for a sample of CFP for web-fed printing (including products produced by the Union industry) it can be seen that these products would not fall into the current product definition which would show that the criterion of ‘resistance to picking’ for distinguishing CFP used in web-fed and sheet-fed printing is unsuitable.
For det første blev der ikke fremlagt dokumentation for påstanden om, at papirets vandindhold kan gøre testresultaterne for ISO-testen ISO-standard 3783:2006 upålidelige.
Firstly, no evidence was submitted with regard to the claim that the moisture content of the paper may render test results for ISO test standard ISO 3783:2006 unreliable.
For det andet blev testningen af stikprøver af coated finpapir til rotationstryk ikke foretaget af en uafhængig ekspert, og derfor blev testene ikke anset for tilstrækkeligt pålidelige og objektive til at drage konklusioner på grundlag heraf.
Secondly, as far as the testing of samples of CFP for web-fed printing is concerned, such tests were not made by an independent expert and the reliability and objectivity of such tests were therefore considered insufficient to base any conclusions thereon.
Derfor blev rivefasthed foreløbigt anset for at være en troværdig teknisk egenskab til at skelne mellem coated finpapir til brug i henholdsvis rotationspresser og fladtrykspresser.
Therefore, the resistance to picking was provisionally found to be a reliable technical characteristic to distinguish between CFP used in web-fed and the one used in sheet-fed printing.
I løbet af undersøgelsen hævdede visse parter også, at multiplekspapir og multiplekskarton (som defineret i næste betragtning) bør holdes uden for undersøgelsens dækningsområde.
During the course of the investigation, certain parties also claimed that multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard (as defined in the next recital) should be excluded from the scope of the investigation.
De hævdede, at multiplekspapir og multiplekskarton har andre fysiske kendetegn som f.eks. flere lag, større stivhed og lavere massefylde, og at den endelige anvendelse for disse produkter er anderledes, eftersom de normalt bruges til foldepap og emballage.
They claimed that multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard had different physical characteristics such as multiple plies, higher stiffness and lower density and that the final use of these products was different as these are usually used for folding carton and packaging applications.
Endelig hævdede disse parter, at enkeltlags- og multiplekspapir og -karton er let at kende på det fysiske udseende.
These parties finally claimed that single-ply and multi-ply paper and paperboard would be easily distinguished by their physical appearance.
Multiplekspapir og multiplekskarton, som defineret i de forklarende bemærkninger til HS, pos. 4805, er varer, som fremstilles ved at sammenpresse to eller flere lag fugtig papirmasse, hvor mindst en egenskab er forskellig fra de andre.
Multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard, as defined in the Harmonised System Explanatory Notes to subheading 4805, are products obtained by pressing together two or more layers of moist pulps of which at least one characteristics different from the others.
Forskellene kan skyldes de anvendte massers art (f.eks. genbrugsaffald), fremstillingsmetoden (f.eks. mekanisk eller kemisk) eller, hvis masserne er af samme art og er fremstillet ved den samme metode, forarbejdningsgraden (f.eks. ubleget, bleget eller farvet).
These differences may arise from the nature of pulps used (e.g. recycled waste), the method of production (e.g. mechanical or chemical) or, if the pulps are of the same nature and have been produced by the same method, the degree of processing (e.g. unbleached, bleached or coloured).
Undersøgelsen viste, at multiplekspapir og -karton rent faktisk har en række andre fysiske og tekniske egenskaber. Det har nærmere bestemt flere lag papirmasse, hvilket giver det større stivhed.
The investigation showed that multi-ply paper and paperboard has indeed some different physical and technical characteristics; more specifically it has several layers of pulp giving it an increased rigidity.
Multiplekspapir og -karton fremstilles ved en anden fremstillingsproces, der kræver en anden papirmaskine end den, der bruges til fremstilling af coated finpapir, eftersom flere lag papirmasse laves til et enkelt produkt under fremstillingsprocessen. Endelig bruges multiplekspapir og -karton til andre formål (især emballage) end coated finpapir, der bruges til højkvalitetstrykning af reklamemateriale, tidsskrifter osv.
Multi-ply paper and paperboard is produced by a different production method requiring a different paper machine than the one used for the production of CFP, as in the production process several layers of pulp are layered into a single product.
Multiplekspapir og –karton som defineret i betragtning 24 betragtes derfor midlertidigt ikke som den pågældende vare.
Finally, multi-ply paper and paperboard serves different purposes (mainly packaging) compared to CFP that is used for high quality printing of promotional material, magazines, etc. Multi-ply paper and paperboard as defined in recital 24 is therefore provisionally considered as not being the product concerned.
Derfor er de nævnte KN-koder, der vedrører import af multiplekspapir og multiplekskarton, midlertidigt udelukket fra undersøgelsen.
Consequently, the CN codes mentioned covering imports of multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard are provisionally excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Endelig hævdede en kinesisk producent, at såkaldt »pap« skulle holdes uden for undersøgelsen, eftersom det ikke falder ind under definitionen af finpapir (både coated og ikke-coated) på grund af påståede forskelle i vægt, tykkelse og stivhed.
Finally, one Chinese producer claimed that so called ‘paperboard’ should be excluded from the scope of the investigation as it does not fall under the definition of fine paper (whether coated or not) because of alleged differences in its weight, thickness and rigidity.
Man fandt, at betegnelsen »pap« generelt bruges om papir med stor massefylde, hvilket generelt gør papiret tungere, dvs. »pap« defineres normalt som papir med en basisvægt over 224 g/m2.
It was found that the term ‘paperboard’ is generally used for paper with high substances making the paper in general heavier, i.e. ‘paperboard’ is commonly defined as paper with a basis weight of above 224 g/m2.
Men undersøgelsen viste, at forskellen i vægt ikke har nogen betydende indvirkning på de øvrige fysiske og tekniske egenskaber og endelige anvendelsesformål, der kan gøre det muligt at skelne det fra den pågældende vare.
However, the investigation revealed that the difference in weight does not have a significant impact on the remaining physical and technical characteristic and end uses which would it make distinguishable from the product concerned.
Det bemærkes ligeledes, at som beskrevet i betragtning 14 blev alt coated finpapir med en vægt på 70 g/m2 eller derover, dog højst 400 g/m2, eksplicit medtaget i definitionen af den pågældende vare.
It is also noted that, as outlined in recital 14, all CFP with a weight of 70 g/m2 or more but not exceeding 400 g/m2 were explicitly included in the definition of the product concerned.
Derfor anses pap midlertidigt som værende den berørte vare.
Therefore paperboard is provisionally considered as being the product concerned.
Det blev konstateret, at den pågældende vare, der fremstilles og sælges på hjemmemarkedet i Kina og på hjemmemarkedet i USA, der blev valgt som midlertidigt referenceland, samt varen, der fremstilles og sælges i EU af EU-producenter, havde de samme grundlæggende fysiske og tekniske egenskaber og anvendelsesformål.
The product concerned, the product produced and sold on the domestic market of the PRC, and on the domestic market of USA, which served provisionally as the analogue country, as well as the product manufactured and sold in the Union by the Union producers were found to have the same basic physical and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses.
Kun to eksporterende producenter i Kina gav sig til kende og reagerede på anmodningen om stikprøvedata i indledningsmeddelelsen.
Only two exporting producers groups in the PRC came forward and replied to the request for sampling data in the Notice of initiation.
En koncern (Chenming) repræsenterer to forretningsmæssigt forbundne eksporterende producenter, mens den anden gruppe (APP) repræsenterer fire forretningsmæssigt forbundne eksporterende producenter.
One group (Chenming) represents 2 related exporting producers while the other group (APP) represents 4 related exporting producers.
De samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter står for den samlede eksport af den pågældende vare fra Kina til EU.
The cooperating exporting producers represent the total exports of the product concerned from the PRC to the Union.
I betragtning af det potentielt store antal EU-producenter påtænktes det i indledningsmeddelelsen at anvende stikprøver i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 17, stk. 1.
In view of the potentially large number of Union producers sampling was envisaged in the Notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Men efter gennemgang af de indkomne oplysninger, og eftersom kun fire EU-producenter gav sig til kende inden for fristerne i indledningsmeddelelsen, besluttede man, at der ikke var behov for stikprøver.
However, after examination of the information submitted and given that only four Union producers came forward within the deadlines set in the Notice of initiation, it was decided that sampling was not necessary.
De fire samarbejdsvillige producenter blev anset for at være repræsentative (tegnede sig for 61 % af den samlede produktion) for EU-erhvervsgrenen som defineret i betragtning 77 nedenfor.
The four cooperating producers were considered to be representative (covering 61 % of total production) of the Union industry as defined in recital 77 below.
Oplysningerne fra de samarbejdsvillige virksomheder blev kontrolleret på stedet og anvendt i forbindelse med mikroindikatorerne som beskrevet i betragtning 90.
The information provided by the cooperating companies was verified on-spot and was used for the micro indicators as explained in recital 90.
I betragtning af det potentielt store antal importører påtænktes det i indledningsmeddelelsen at anvende stikprøver i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 17, stk. 1.
In view of the potentially large number of importers, sampling was envisaged for importers in the Notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Den generelle metode, der er beskrevet nedenfor, er blevet anvendt for de samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter i Kina.
The general methodology set out below has been applied to the cooperating exporting producers in the PRC.
I henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra b), skal den normale værdi i antidumpingundersøgelser vedrørende import fra Kina fastsættes i overensstemmelse med samme artikels stk. 1-6 for de eksporterende producenter, som viste sig at opfylde kriterierne i grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra c).
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those exporting producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Virksomhedernes beslutninger og udgifter afspejler markedsvilkårene uden nogen væsentlig statslig indgriben, og udgifterne afspejler markedsværdierne.
business decisions and costs are made in response to market conditions, without significant state interference, and costs reflect market values;
Virksomheder skal have ét klart sæt regnskaber, som revideres uafhængigt i henhold til internationale regnskabsstandarder (i det følgende benævnt »IAS«) og anvendes til alle formål
firms have one clear set of accounting records which are independently audited, in line with international accounting standards (IAS) and applied for all purposes;
Kun en enkelt eksporterende producentgruppe i Kina ansøgte om markedsøkonomisk behandling i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra b).
Only one exporting producers group (i.e. APP) in the PRC requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Parten fremlagde 33 formularer med anmodning om markedsøkonomisk behandling vedrørende dens fire forretningsmæssigt forbundne eksporterende producenter og en række andre forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomheder, der arbejder med den pågældende vare, f.eks. papirmøller, kemiske virksomheder, skovbrugsselskaber (leverandørindustrier) og indenlandske handelsselskaber.
The party submitted 33 MET claim forms referring to its four related exporting producers and a series of other related companies involved in the product concerned i.e. pulp mills, chemical companies, forestry companies (upstream producers) and domestic trading companies.
I lyset af det store antal ansøgninger om markedsøkonomisk behandling anså man det for formålstjenligt ved den foreløbige undersøgelse at begrænse kontrolbesøgene på stedet til de fire eksporterende medlemmer af gruppen.
Account taken of the high number of MET claims, it was considered appropriate, for the purpose of the preliminary investigation, to limit the on-spot verification visits to the four exporting producers of the group.
Kommissionen indhentede alle oplysninger, som den fandt nødvendige, og efterprøvede oplysningerne i ansøgningerne om markedsøkonomisk behandling hos de fire forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomheder.
The Commission sought all the information deemed necessary and verified all the information submitted in the MET claims at the premises of the four related exporting producers.
Man fandt ikke, at det var muligt at indrømme markedsøkonomisk behandling, eftersom ingen af dem opfyldte det første, andet og tredje kriterium i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra c).
It was considered that MET should not be granted because none of them met the first, second and third criteria as laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.