natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For det første bemærkes det, at da godstykkelsen ikke er anvendt i definitionen af, hvad undersøgelsen omfatter, forbliver den udvendige diameter og kulstofværdigrænsen de bedst egnede elementer til identificering af den pågældende vare.
First of all, it must be noted that since the wall thickness is not used in the definition of the scope of the investigation, the external diameter and the CEV threshold remain the most appropriate elements to identify the product concerned.
Den udvendige diameter er også et element, der anvendes i forbindelse med statistik og told for at skelne varen fra andre varer.
The external diameter is also an element used in distinguishing the product for statistical and customs purposes.
Kulstofværdigrænsen angiver det niveau, ved hvilket varen kan smedes, og er fastsat til 0,86 for at sondre mellem varer, der let kan smedes, og varer, der ikke kan.
As regards the CEV threshold, it defines the level at which a product can be welded and the threshold is set at 0,86 in order to separate products which can easily be welded from those which can not.
For det andet viser de oplysninger, som EF-industrien er fremkommet med, at OCTG-rør i lighed med andre typer rør kan have både høj og lav modstandsdygtighed over for korrosion og tryk.
Secondly, information provided by the Community industry shows that OCTG, as other types of tubes, may have both high and low corrosion/pressure resistance.
Hverken modstandsdygtigheden over for korrosion eller tryk kan derfor bruges som kriterium ved definitionen af den pågældende vare.
Thus neither the corrosion nor the pressure resistance could be used as a criterion in defining the product concerned.
For det tredje findes de særlige standarder fra API for OCTG-rør, fordi de anvendes i oliesektoren.
Thirdly, the special API standards exist as regards OCTG and line pipes because they are used in the petroleum sector.
Der findes imidlertid lignende standarder for rør, der anvendes i andre sektorer, men de er udstedt af andre organisationer (f.eks. ASTM).
However, tubes used in other sectors are also subject to similar standards, although issued by other organisations (e.g. ASTM).
At den ene eller anden organisation har udstedt standarder, kan derfor ikke indgå som element ved fastlæggelsen af, hvilke varer der skal være omfattet af en antidumpingundersøgelse.
As a result, the fact that standards are issued by one or the other organisation cannot be an element to define the product scope of an anti-dumping investigation.
Hverken CISA eller MOFCOM har følgelig indgivet gyldige alternative elementer til en bedre definition af området for undersøgelsen eller foreslået kriterier, der vil være mere egnede til at definere den pågældende vare, bortset fra ovennævnte høje modstandsdygtighed over for korrosion og tryk.
In conclusion, neither CISA nor Mofcom has submitted valid alternative elements to better define the product scope, nor have they ever proposed criteria that would be more appropriate to define the product concerned, apart from the high corrosion/pressure resistance mentioned above.
Dertil kommer, at ingen af parterne har foreslået en anden kulstofgrænseværdi som mere egnet.
In addition, neither party proposed a different CEV level as a more appropriate threshold.
Påstandene vedrørende definitionen af varen afvises derfor.
Therefore, the claims on the definition of the product concerned are rejected.
Under henvisning til ovenstående konkluderes det endeligt, at den pågældende vare bl.a. omfatter OCTG-rør, der bruges som bore-, forings- og transportrør i olieindustrien, og betragtning 14-19 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes hermed endeligt.
In view of the above, it is definitively concluded that the product concerned incorporates, inter alia, OCTG used for drilling, casing and tubing in the oil industry, and recitals 14 to 19 of the provisional Regulation are hereby definitively confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat bemærkninger om markedsøkonomisk behandling, bekræftes indholdet af betragtning 20-27 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed endeligt.
In the absence of any comments, the content of recitals 20 to 27 of the provisional Regulation concerning MET findings is hereby definitively confirmed.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de foreløbige konklusioner påstod klageren, at en af de eksporterende producenter, som midlertidigt var blevet indrømmet individuel behandling, ikke burde have været indrømmet individuel behandling, da den angiveligt hovedsageligt var statsejet.
Further to provisional disclosure, the complainant claimed that one exporting producer provisionally granted IT should not have received IT, as among other things, it was allegedly majority state owned.
Yderligere undersøgelser viste, at den kinesiske stat ganske vist (indirekte) havde en vis andel i den pågældende virksomhed, men at staten var mindretalsaktionær i UP.
Further investigation showed that the Chinese state did (indirectly) have some stake in the said company, but during the IP the state was a minority shareholder.
Aktieandelen ændredes dog betragteligt hen imod slutningen af 2008 (efter UP), hvor den kinesiske stat købte flere aktier i holdingselskabet, og staten således blev majoritetsaktionær.
However, the shareholding changed significantly at the end of 2008 (post-IP) when the Chinese state acquired more shares of the holding company and the state thus became a majority shareholder.
Kommissionen fandt derfor, at den pågældende eksporterende producent ikke ville opfylde kravene i grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 5, og ikke burde indrømmes individuel behandling.
Consequently, the Commission considered that the exporting producer in question would not fulfil the requirements of Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation and should not be granted IT.
Det nævnte virksomhed anførte særlig, at den øgede aktieandel ikke havde betydning for ledelsesstrukturen, bestyrelsens sammensætning eller handelsaktiviteterne.
In particular, the said company claimed that the increased shareholding had no impact on the management structure, the composition of the Board of Directors and the commercial activities.
Den hævdede også, at den ændrede aktieandel ikke have indflydelse på virksomhedens beslutninger med hensyn til eksportaktiviteter, og at disse fortsat træffes uafhængigt af staten.
It also claimed that the change in shareholding had no effect on the company’s decisions regarding export activities that remain to be made independently from the state.
Virksomheden anførte derudover, at der ikke er ført bevis for, at statens indflydelse i denne sag ville være af en sådan art, at det ville være muligt at omgå foranstaltninger, hvis virksomheden fik en individuel toldsats.
The company also submitted that no evidence has been shown that in this case state influence would be such as to permit circumvention of measures if the company would be given an individual rate of duty.
For at få individuel behandling skal eksporterende producenter dokumentere, at de opfylder alle de kriterier, der er nævnt i grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 5.
In order to be granted IT, exporting producers must demonstrate that they fulfil all the criteria enumerated in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Et af disse kriterier er, at størstedelen af aktierne skal tilhøre private.
One of these criteria is that the majority of shares belong to private persons.
For den nævnte virksomhed har dette kriterium imidlertid ikke været opfyldt siden udgangen af 2008.
However, as regards the said company, this criterion has not been met since the end of 2008.
På trods af at ændringerne i ejerforholdene først indtraf efter UP (men dog før undersøgelsens afslutning), og i betragtning af at konklusionerne vedrørende individuel behandling har et fremadrettet perspektiv, konkluderes det derfor, at denne virksomhed ikke bør indrømmes individuel behandling, da den ikke opfyldte kravene i grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 5.
Consequently, despite the fact that the change of ownership happened only after the IP (but still before the conclusion of the investigation) and considering the prospective nature of the findings with regard to IT, it is concluded that this company should not be granted IT, as it did not fulfil the requirements of Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger om individuel behandling, bekræftes indholdet af betragtning 28-32 i forordningen om midlertidig told, med undtagelse af oplysningerne vedrørende den virksomhed, der er omhandlet i betragtning 19-23, hermed endeligt.
In the absence of any other comments concerning IT, the content of recitals 28 to 32 of the provisional Regulation, other than those concerning the company mentioned in recitals 19 to 23 above, is hereby definitively confirmed.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de foreløbige konklusioner hævdede tre parter, at USA ikke var egnet som referenceland, da markedsforholdene i henholdsvis USA og Kina er meget forskellige.
Following the provisional disclosure, three parties submitted that the USA was not an appropriate analogue country since the market conditions in the USA and in the PRC are significantly different.
Det blev også anført, at beregningen af den normale værdi var baseret på oplysninger fra en enkelt producent, som var forretningsmæssigt forbundet med en EF-producent, og at oplysningerne således ikke var repræsentative.
It was also submitted that the normal value calculation was based on the data of only one producer, related to a producer in the Community, and thus were not representative.
Det skal bemærkes, at grundforordningen bestemmer, at referencelandet skal udvælges på en ikke urimelig måde.
It is noted that the basic Regulation requires that the analogue country be selected in a not unreasonable manner.
Ovennævnte parter forelagde ikke dokumentation for, at valget af USA var urimeligt.
The parties mentioned above failed to provide substantiated evidence that the choice of the USA was unreasonable.
Navnlig satte de ikke spørgsmålstegn ved det amerikanske markeds konkurrenceevne, og manglende konkurrenceevne kunne f.eks. have betydning for det prisniveau, der fastsættes.
In particular, they did not question the competitiveness of the US market, the lack of which for example could have an impact on the level of prices established.
Det skal også bemærkes, at ingen af de pågældende parter foreslog et alternativt valg af referenceland.
It is also noted that none of the parties in question suggested any alternative choice for the analogue country.
På baggrund af ovenstående konkluderes det endeligt, at USA er et passende valg af referenceland, og betragtning 33-38 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes hermed.
In view of the above, it is definitively concluded that the USA is an appropriate analogue country and recitals 33 to 38 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke fremsat bemærkninger om fastsættelsen af den normale værdi, bekræftes de foreløbige resultater i betragtning 39-44 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any comments concerning the determination of normal value, the provisional findings in recitals 39 to 44 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende fastsættelse af eksportprisen, bekræftes indholdet af betragtning 45 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any comments concerning the determination of export price, the content of recital 45 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de foreløbige konklusioner påpegede en af de eksporterende producenter, at den forenkling, der var anvendt i forbindelse med varekontrolnumrene (for at forbedre sammenligneligheden mellem den pågældende vare og samme vare fra referencelandet), medførte en urimelig sammenligning, da en række forskellige typer af sømløse rør blev behandlet som en og samme varekategori.
Following provisional disclosure, one exporting producer pointed out that the simplification applied to the product control number (in order to increase the level of comparability between the product concerned and the like product from the analogue country) resulted in an unfair comparison as it treated several types of the seamless pipes and tubes as one product category.
På grundlag af denne bemærkning blev det besluttet, at der kunne anvendes en anden opdeling af varekontrolnumrene, som tager udgangspunkt i rørets diameter og godstykkelse, og som giver samme grad af sammenlignelighed.
Following this comment, it was decided that a different regrouping of the product control numbers that would allow for a similar level of comparability can be applied — namely with regard to pipe diameter and wall thickness.
Efter fremlæggelsen af de foreløbige konklusioner er de kinesiske eksportpriser, ab fabrik, blevet justeret i nedadgående retning for at tage hensyn til alle transportomkostninger.
Following provisional disclosure, Chinese export prices at ex-works level have been revised downwards in order to take into account all transport costs.
Samtidig blev den normale værdi justeret i opadgående retning på grund af en række ændringer, der vedrører justeringer for transport og rabatter.
At the same time, normal value was revised upwards due to some corrections concerning allowances for transport and discounts.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende sammenligning, bekræftes indholdet af betragtning 46 og 47 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any other comments in respect of comparison, the content of recitals 46 and 47 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende beregningen af dumpingmargenen og under hensyntagen til de i betragtning 30 og 31 omhandlede ændringer bekræftes indholdet af betragtning 48-51 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any comments concerning the dumping margin calculation, and subject to the changes mentioned at recitals 30 and 31, the content of recitals 48 to 51 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Udtrykt i procent af nettoprisen cif, frit Fællesskabets grænse, ufortoldet, fastsættes den endelige dumpingmargen til følgende:
The amount of dumping finally determined, expressed as a percentage of the cif net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, is as follows:
De resterende virksomheder
Residual
EF-produktionen, EF-erhvervsgrenen og EF-forbruget
Community production, Community industry and Community consumption
CISA hævdede, at ifølge oplysninger fra et specialagentur (Steel Business Briefing) var der i 2007 mindst 40 EF-producenter af samme vare i EU-27, som havde en produktion på ca. 5,8 mio. tons, hvilket er i modstrid med de relevante oplysninger i forordningen om midlertidig told.
CISA claimed that, according to information released by a specialised agency (Steel Business Briefing), there were at least 40 Community producers in 2007 of the like product in the EU-27 with a production of around 5,8 million tonnes and this would contradict the relevant data contained in the provisional Regulation.
CISA hævdede også, at ifølge oplysninger offentliggjort af World Steel Association var EF-forbruget på ca. 4,6 mio. tons i 2007, dvs. langt større end angivet i betragtning 57 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
CISA also claimed that, according to information released by the World Steel Association, Community consumption was of around 4,6 million tonnes in 2007, i.e. far higher than what was reported in recital 57 of the provisional Regulation.
En kinesisk eksporterende producent fremsatte tilsvarende påstande.
A Chinese exporting producer also made similar claims.
Undersøgelsen af de forelagte oplysninger viste, at de anførte tal vedrører alle sømløse rør og ikke samme vare som defineret i forordningen om midlertidig told og i betragtning 10-17 og omfatter andre varer som f.eks. store rør (dvs. med en diameter på over 406,4 mm) og rør af rustfrit stål.
The examination of the information provided showed that the figures reported refer to all seamless pipes and tubes and not to the like product as defined in the provisional Regulation and in recitals 10 to 17 above, and include other products such as large pipes and tubes (i.e. with a diameter exceeding 406,4 mm) and stainless steel pipes and tubes.
Dette forklarer uoverensstemmelsen mellem oplysningerne i betragtning 35 og oplysningerne i forordningen om midlertidig told.
This explains the discrepancy between the information mentioned in recital 35 above and that contained in the provisional Regulation.
Det bør også bemærkes, at navn og adresse på alle kendte EF-producenter af samme vare kunne findes i den ikke-fortrolige version af klagen.
It should also be noted that names and locations of all known Community producers of the product concerned were contained in the non-confidential version of the complaint.
Hvis CISA var af den opfattelse, at der var andre producenter af den pågældende vare i EU, skulle virksomheden rettidigt have forelagt beviser, der gjorde det muligt at udpege dem, således at sådanne virksomheder også kunne være blevet taget i betragtning.
If CISA had considered that there were any other producers of the product concerned in the EU, it should have provided in due course sufficient evidence to identify them, so that any such company would also have been considered.
Påstandene ovenfor afvises derfor, og indholdet af betragtning 53-58 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes hermed.
The claims mentioned above are therefore dismissed and the content of recitals 53 to 58 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Mængde, den pågældende imports markedsandel og importpriser
Volume, market share of the imports concerned and import prices
På grundlag af en række bemærkninger forelagt af CISA skal det præciseres, at det i betragtning 60 i forordningen om midlertidig told er hensigten at henvise til, at markedssegmenterne for henholdsvis OCTG-rør og kraftproduktion hver især tegner sig for mindre end 5 % af den samlede import fra Kina.
Following comments submitted by CISA, it is clarified that recital 60 of the provisional Regulation should be intended as meaning that the OCTG and power generation market segments each represented less than 5 % of total imports from the PRC.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre påstande eller bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 59-63 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any claims or other comments, recitals 59 to 63 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
En eksporterende producent, tre EF-producenter og klageren fremsatte bemærkninger til beregningen af prisunderbuddet og skadesmargenerne.
An exporting producer, three Community producers and the complainant submitted comments relating to the calculation of the undercutting and injury margins.
Disse bemærkninger blev analyseret, og beregningerne blev ændret, hvor det var relevant.
These comments were analysed and, where appropriate, the calculations were amended.
En af de eksporterende producenter hævdede, at de justeringer, der var blevet foretaget for at sikre en rimelig sammenligning af priserne på de kinesiske importvarer og priserne på de tilsvarende varetyper, der sælges af EF-erhvervsgrenen, ikke var tilstrækkelige, da de ikke omfattede justering for en uafhængig importørs salgs- og administrationsomkostninger, andre generalomkostninger samt fortjeneste.
One exporting producer claimed that the adjustments made to compare on a fair basis the prices of the Chinese imports and the prices of the corresponding product types sold by the Community industry were not adequate, since they did not include an amount for the selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and profit of an independent importer.
Klageren hævdede derimod, at disse justeringer var ekstremt store.
On the contrary, the complainant claimed that the level of these adjustments was excessively high.
Vedrørende den eksporterende producents påstand blev det konstateret, at kinesiske eksporterende producenter og EF-producenter ofte sælger til de samme kunder.
As for the claim of the exporting producer, it was found that often Chinese exporting producers and Community producers were selling to the same customers.
Der var derfor ikke grundlag for en yderligere justering af importpriserne.
Thus, a further adjustment to import prices was not justified.
Efter en undersøgelse af de forelagte beviser blev det konkluderet, at disse påstande burde afvises, og de to parter blev underrettet om årsagerne hertil.
After examination of the evidence provided, it was concluded that the claims should be dismissed and the two parties were informed of the reasons therefor.
Klageren anførte, at beregningen af forskellene i handelsled var forkert, da de kinesiske eksporterende producenter også sælger direkte til brugerne, og at der for et sådant salg ikke bør finde nogen justering for handelsleddet sted.
The complainant claimed that the calculation of the differences in level of trade was incorrect since Chinese exporting producers also directly sold to users and that for such sales no level of trade adjustment is warranted.
Denne påstand blev fundet korrekt for nogle kinesiske eksporterende producenters vedkommende, og justeringen for handelsleddet blev ændret i overensstemmelse hermed.
This claim was found to be correct for some Chinese exporting producers and the level of trade adjustment was accordingly revised.
Den eksporterende producent, der er nævnt i betragtning 40, anførte desuden, at på grund af væsentlige forskelle i de solgte mængder mellem importen fra denne producent og EF-erhvervsgrenens salg burde justeringen for handelsleddet ikke ske blot ved at sammenligne den respektive procentdel af salget til brugerne, og foreslog en anden metode for beregningen af den korrigerede justering for handelsleddet.
Furthermore, the exporting producer mentioned in recital 40 above argued that, because of significant differences in sales volumes between its own imports and the sales of the Community industry, the difference in level of trade should not be established by simply comparing the respective percentage of sales to users and suggested another formula for the calculation of the revised level of trade adjustment.
Den foreslåede metode blev imidlertid ikke fundet egnet, da den ville forvanske resultatet.
However, the suggested formula was not considered appropriate since it would distort the result.
På grundlag af ovenstående bekræftes den i betragtning 64 i forordningen om midlertidig told omhandlede metode hermed, og den beregnede underbudsmargen, jf. betragtning 65 i forordningen om midlertidig told, fastsættes til 29 %.
On the basis of the above, the methodology described in recital 64 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed and the undercutting margin calculated as explained in recital 65 of the provisional Regulation is established at 29 %.
CISA hævdede, at en række af EF-producenterne i stikprøven ikke havde besvaret hele spørgeskemaet, og at stikprøven dermed ikke var tilstrækkeligt repræsentativ på grund af det lave samarbejdsniveau.
CISA claimed that a number of sampled Community producers had not submitted completed replies, so that the representativeness of the sample would be impaired because of the low level of cooperation.
Det bør understreges, at bortset fra den i nr. ii) i betragtning 66 i forordningen om midlertidig told omhandlede virksomhed, som kun besvarede spørgeskemaet delvist, havde alle andre virksomheder i stikprøven forelagt alle de ønskede oplysninger i undersøgelsens afsluttende fase.
It should be pointed out that, apart from the company indicated at point (ii) of recital 66 of the provisional Regulation, which only submitted partial information, all other companies in the sample have provided by the definitive stage of the investigation all the information requested.
Selv hvis der ses bort fra den ene virksomhed, som kun havde besvaret spørgeskemaet delvist, vil stikprøven stadig være repræsentativ for ca. 60 % af den samlede EF-produktion.
Even when excluding the sole company that had only provided partial information, the representativeness of the sample would in any case remain at about 60 % of the total Community production.