natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
De franske myndigheder hævdede desuden, at en foranstaltning, der har til formål at kompensere virksomheder for bestemte omkostninger, der påføres dem som følge af deres public service-forpligtelser, ikke kan betragtes som omstruktureringsstøtte, således som denne er defineret i rammebestemmelserne.
Moreover, the French authorities submit that a measure designed to offset the costs burdening undertakings on account of their public service obligations is not in the nature of restructuring aid as defined in the guidelines.
De franske myndigheder fandt, at selv om dette beløb var blevet anmeldt som omstruktureringsstøtte i forbindelse med en samlet rekapitaliseringsoperation, var Kommissionen ikke bundet af de betegnelser, medlemsstaterne anvendte, og at det tværtimod påhvilede Kommissionen i givet fald at ændre betegnelsen, hvis der ikke var tale om statsstøtte, eller betegne en statsstøtteforanstaltning som værende en sådan, selv om den pågældende medlemsstat ikke have præsenteret den sådan.
The French authorities submit that, even if that amount was notified in connection with the total cash injection in respect of restructuring aid, the Commission is not bound by the classifications adopted by the Member States and that, on the other hand, it is for the Commission to reclassify a measure, depending on the circumstances, as non-State aid, or, on the contrary, to classify a measure as State aid even though the Member State in question did not present it in that manner.
Vedrørende det restbeløb, der var anmeldt som omstruktureringsstøtte
The balance notified for restructuring aid
På baggrund af ovenstående fandt Frankrig, at hvis det blev vurderet, at beløbet på 53,48 mio. EUR ikke indeholdt støtteelementer eller var støtte, der var forenelig med EF-traktatens artikel 86, stk. 2, udgjorde det støttebeløb, der i anmeldelsen fra 2002 skulle betragtes som omstruktureringsstøtte, ikke 76 mio. EUR, men kun 15,81 mio. EUR.
In the light of the foregoing, France takes the view that, if the amount of EUR 53,48 is considered to be free from aid elements or if it is classified as aid compatible with Article 86(2) EC, the amount of aid which must be considered to be restructuring aid under the 2002 notification would amount, not to EUR 76 million, but to EUR 15,81 million.
Frankrig erindrede indledningsvis om, at den omfattende sociale uro i 2004-2005 og forværringen af SNCM's økonomiske og finansielle situation havde foranlediget staten til som hovedaktionær at iværksætte en procedure i januar 2005 for udvælgelse af private investorer og gennemføre hasteforanstaltninger (bl.a. salget af Asco og af aktieposten i Sud-Cargos.
France recalls, first, that the seriousness of the industrial action of 2004 to 2005 and the deterioration in the economic and financial situation of SNCM led the State shareholder to launch a procedure for selecting private investors in January 2005 and to implement urgent measures (in particular the sale of Asco and the shareholding in Sud Cargos.
Vedrørende den negative afståelsespris for SNCM
The negative transfer price of SNCM
De franske myndigheder opfordrede med henvisning til gældende retspraksis på området Kommissionen til at vurdere, at den negative afståelsespris for SNCM på 158 mio. EUR ikke indeholdt elementer, der kunne betegnes som støtte i den i EF-traktatens artikel 87, stk. 1, fastsatte betydning, eftersom den franske stat havde handlet på samme måde som en privat, markedsøkonomisk investor.
Pursuant to the relevant Community case-law, the French authorities call upon the Commission to consider that the negative sale price of SNCM of EUR 158 million does not contain any measure which may be classified as aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC in so far as the French State acted like a private investor in a market economy.
Frankrig bemærkede indledningsvis, at slutprisen på 158 mio. EUR, der var lavere i negativ pris end den negative pris, overtagerne oprindeligt forlangte efter deres gennemgang af SNCM, var resultatet af forhandlinger om afståelse af kontrol, der blev ført i forbindelse med et åbent, gennemsigtigt og ikke-diskriminatorisk udbud, og derfor måtte betragtes som en markedspris.
First of all, France observes that the final price of EUR 158 million, which is lower than the negative price which the purchasers asked for initially at the time of their audit of SNCM, is the result of a negotiation of transfer of control conducted in connection with an open, transparent and non-discriminatory competitive tendering procedure and, on that ground, does in fact constitute a market price.
Frankrig mente, at eftersom denne søgen efter en privat partner til SNCM var foregået inden for rammerne af en åben, gennemsigtig og ikke-diskriminatorisk udbudsprocedure, hvor man havde valgt det bedste bud, var afståelsesprisen en markedspris.
France takes the view that, in so far as that search for a private partner for SNCM was made in an open, transparent and non-discriminatory competitive tendering procedure, at the end of which the best bid was chosen, the sale price is a market price.
Ifølge de franske myndigheder havde salget til den negative pris på 158 mio. EUR fundet sted på de for staten mest fordelagtige betingelser i overensstemmelse med EF-retspraksis og Kommissionens beslutningspraksis og indeholdt derfor intet støtteelement.
According to the French authorities, the negative sale price of EUR 158 million took place in the most favourable conditions for the State in accordance with Community case-law and the Commission’s line of decisions and contains no aid element.
Frankrig mente således, at denne negative pris var lavere end de likvidationsomkostninger, staten skulle have dækket, hvis virksomheden var trådt i likvidation
France takes the view that that negative price is lower than the liquidation cost which the State would have to bear in the event of the liquidation of the undertaking.
Denne konklusion var ifølge de franske myndigheder en logisk følge dels af Domstolens retspraksis (herefter benævnt »Gröditzer-dommen«), dels af vurderingen af de faktiske omkostninger ved en likvidation af SNCM (ABX-beslutningen).
That is the only conclusion which can be reached irrespective of whether the approach followed is that stemming from the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (the Gröditzer case-law’) or that based on the analysis of the actual liquidation costs of SNCM (the ABX decision).
Hvad angik den første vurderingsmetode baseret på Gröditzer-dommen, hævdede Frankrig, at denne dom bekræftede Kommissionens vurdering i beslutningen af 8. juli 1999, hvorefter »det kun er likvidationsværdien […] af anlægsaktiverne […], der kan betragtes som likvidationsomkostninger«.
As regards the first method, based on the Gröditzer case-law, France states that that judgment confirmed the Commission’s assessment in its decision of 8 July 1999, to the effect that ‘the cost of liquidation comprises only the liquidation value of the asset’s.
I denne forbindelse var likvidationsværdien af anlægsaktiverne i rapporterne fra CGMF og Oddo-Hastings sat til mindst […] mio. EUR pr. 30. september 2005.
In that respect, the reports of CGMF and Oddo-Hastings estimate the liquidation value of the assets at a minimum of EUR […] million on 30 September 2005.
Eftersom staten som hovedaktionær i et selskab ikke er ansvarlig for selskabets gæld ud over værdien af dets aktiver (Hytasa-dommen), påpegede Frankrig, at likvidationsværdien af selskabets aktiver, der blev anslået til mindst […] mio. EUR, var væsentligt højere end den negative afståelsespris på 158 mio. EUR.
Accordingly, in so far as the State as the owner and shareholder of a company is responsible for its debts only up to a maximum of the liquidation value of their assets (the Hytasa case), France asserts that the liquidation value of the assets of the company estimated at EUR […] million is considerably higher than the negative sale price of EUR 158 million.
Hvad angår den anden vurderingsmetode, anførte Frankrig, at den var afledt af Kommissionens beslutning vedrørende belgisk statsstøtte til ABX Logistics. Kommissionen undersøgte en negativ afståelsespris, der i lighed med prisen i den foreliggende sag havde karakter af en markedspris, og sammenlignede den med de omkostninger, som staten i sin egenskab af aktionær reelt skulle have dækket ved en frivillig akkord eller likvidation i henhold til en sagkyndig vurdering fra en uafhængig tredjepart.
On the second method, France states that it follows from the Commission decision on the State aid implemented by Belgium for ABX Logistics, in which the Commission examined a negative sale price, having, as in this case, the character of a market price, by comparing it to the costs which the State shareholder would actually bear in the event of a voluntary liquidation or compulsory liquidation as assessed by an independent third party.
Ifølge Frankrig accepterer Kommissionen i den nævnte beslutning, at det er rimeligt at medregne visse omkostninger, der kan tilskrives, at kreditorerne anlægger sag med påstand om personlig hæftelse, eller at den pågældende koncern samtidig likviderer andre afdelinger.
According to France, the Commission recognises in particular in that decision the legality of a certain number of costs which can result from an action ‘en comblement de passif’ (to make good liabilities) by creditors or from the liquidation for other branches of the group liquidating its subsidiary.
På grundlag af de førnævnte rapporter fra CGMF og Oddo-Hastings anslog de franske myndigheder de faktiske omkostninger, som den franske stat skulle have dækket i sin egenskab af hovedaktionær til mellem […] og […] mio. EUR pr. 30. september 2005.
On the basis of the CGMF and Oddo-Hastings reports cited above, the French authorities submit that the actual costs which the French Republic would have to bear as a shareholder amounted to between EUR […] and […] million on 30 September 2005.
Ved denne beregningsmetode tages der hensyn til risikoen for, at den franske stat ville blive dømt til at »hæfte personligt«, hvis en domstol vurderede den som SNCM's reelle leder.
That method takes account, in particular, of the risk that the French State would be called upon ‘en comblement de passif’ if the court were to consider it to be managing de facto SNCM.
De franske myndigheder anslog, at en sådan risiko ikke kunne udelukkes, især ikke i lyset af Kassationsrettens kendelse i en tilsvarende sag.
The French authorities believe that the risk of an action ‘en comblement de passif’ cannot be averted, particularly in light of a precedent of the Cour de Cassation (Court of Cassation) in France.
De franske myndigheder fastholdt således i flere breve til Kommissionen, at hypotesen om, at staten af en national domstol kunne blive holdt ansvarlig for en statskontrolleret virksomhed, var særdeles realistisk, og at der burde tages hensyn til denne risiko ved beregningen af de faktiske omkostninger ved en eventuel likvidation af SNCM.
Accordingly, in several letters to the Commission, the French authorities submitted that a situation in which a national court orders the State to make good the liabilities of the undertaking which it manages is a scenario which is more than plausible and that it had to be taken into account in calculating the actual cost of a possible liquidation of SNCM.
Det var desuden de franske myndigheders opfattelse, at rederiets likvidation på grund af statens tætte forbindelse med SNCM og med henvisning til en anden fransk domstolsafgørelse ville kunne betyde, at staten blev dømt til at betale erstatning og renter til de ansatte.
Furthermore, the French authorities take the view that, because of its dependency on SNCM, and in accordance with another French case, the liquidation of the undertaking might have led the court to order the payment of damages to employees.
De franske myndigheder anså det i lyset af den pågældende afgørelse for overvejende sandsynligt, at en domstol ville fastsætte beløbet for supplerende godtgørelser til de ansatte på grundlag af de beløb, der ville være blevet udbetalt i henhold til en socialplan, der var blevet forelagt forud for likvidationen.
According to that case-law, the French authorities believe that it would be very likely that a court would fix the amount of additional compensation on the basis of the compensation which would be paid under a social plan submitted prior to the liquidation.
Med henvisning til analogien med Aspocomp-dommen mente Frankrig, at staten ville blive dømt til at betale supplerende fratrædelsesgodtgørelser på i alt mellem […] og […] mio. EUR, hvilket ville bringe statens samlede omkostninger ved en likvidation op på mellem […] og […] mio. EUR.
Applying the Aspocomp case-law to the present case, France considers that the State would have been called upon to pay additional redundancy payments for a total cost of between EUR […] and […] million, which would have led ultimately to a total liquidation cost chargeable to the State of between EUR […] and […] million.
I henhold til disse beregninger skulle de faktiske omkostninger for staten som hovedaktionær ved salget af SNCM til en negativ pris på 158 mio. EUR være mindre end dens faktiske omkostninger ved likvidation af virksomheden.
According to that approach, the analysis of actual costs which would have been paid by the State shareholder shows that the cost to the State of the sale of SNCM at a negative price of EUR 158 million is lower than the actual cost which it would have had to bear in the event of the compulsory liquidation of the undertaking.
De franske myndigheder konkluderede, at dette beløb ikke kunne betragtes som statsstøtte.
In conclusion, the French authorities consider that that amount cannot be classified as State aid.
Vedrørende den fælles kapitaltilførsel fra aktionærerne
The joint capital contribution of the shareholders
Det var Frankrigs opfattelse, at staten gennem denne erhvervelse af kapitalandele havde handlet som en fornuftig investor, dels fordi den havde interveneret som mindretalsaktionær i fællesskab med BCP og VT, dels fordi investeringen gav et fast udbytte på […] % om året, hvilket fritog staten for den risiko, der var forbundet med gennemførelsen af forretningsplanen.
France takes the view that, through that shareholding, it acted like a well-informed investor because, first, it intervened concurrently as a minority shareholder alongside BCP and VT and, secondly, that shareholding enjoys a fixed capital return of […] % per year, which exempts the State from exposure in respect of performance of the business plan.
Frankrig hævdede således, at dette afkast var særdeles tilfredsstillende for en privat investor.
France states that that rate of return is very satisfactory for a private investor.
De franske myndigheder præciserede dog, at der ikke skulle udbetales udbytte, hvis SNCM skulle have gældssanering, hvis rederiet trådte i likvidation, eller hvis overtagerne gjorde ophævelsesklausulen gældende.
It states, however, that no payment would be due in the event that SNCM is put into receivership or compulsory liquidation or the cancellation clause is exercised by the purchasers.
Vedrørende de yderligere sociale foranstaltninger (individuel støtte)
The additional social measures (aid to individuals)
Frankrig mente med henvisning til Kommissionens egen beslutningspraksis i bl.a. sagen SFP — Société française de production, at denne finansiering var en støtte til enkeltpersoner, og at virksomheden ikke havde nogen økonomisk fordel af den.
France takes the view that, by relying on the Commission’s practice in previous decisions, in particular the SFP – Société française de production file, that that financing constitutes aid to individuals which does not benefit the undertaking.
Supplerende sociale foranstaltninger med offentlige midler til fordel for de afskedigede medarbejdere, uden at det fritog arbejdsgiveren for dennes normale forpligtelser og omkostninger i den anledning, henhørte under medlemsstaternes social- og arbejdsmarkedspolitik og udgjorde således ikke statsstøtte.
Accordingly, the implementation from public funds of additional social measures for persons laid off, without those measures relieving the employer from its usual responsibilities, falls within the scope of the social policy of the Member States and is not State aid.
Hvis Kommissionen alligevel skulle betragte en del eller alle de nye foranstaltninger som statsstøtte, ville Frankrig gøre opmærksom på, at de nye foranstaltninger, ud over at sikre SNCM's tilbagevenden til rentabel drift, bidrog til opretholdelsen af konkurrencen på de berørte markeder, særlig markedet for besejling af Korsika.
If the Commission were, however, to classify part or all of the new measures as State aid, France draws the Commission’s attention to the fact that the new measures, by ensuring that SNCM becomes viable again, allows competition to be maintained on the markets in question, in particular the market in services to Corsica.
Med hensyn til fastsættelsen af eventuelle kompenserende modydelser fra SNCM's side foreslog Frankrig, at Kommissionen tog hensyn til markedsstrukturen.
As regards the determination of any compensatory measures to be imposed on SNCM, France suggests that the Commission take into account the structure of the market.
En reduktion af SNCM's kapacitet ville kunne styrke den dominerende stilling, som CFF derefter ville have på markedet for besejling af Korsika.
Accordingly, a reduction in SNCM’s capacity would be such as to strengthen the position of CFF on the market of services to Corsica as dominant from then on.
Vedrørende ophævelsen af de restriktioner, der blev pålagt ved den annullerede beslutning fra 2003
The lifting of the restrictions placed by the annulled decision of 2003
BEMÆRKNINGER FRA INTERESSEREDE PARTER
COMMENTS OF INTERESTED PARTIES
Vedrørende beslutningen fra 2002 om at indlede den formelle undersøgelsesprocedure
The decision to initiate the 2002 formal investigation procedure
Bemærkninger fra Corsica Ferries (CFF)
Comments of Corsica Ferries (CFF)
CFF anfægtede for det første, at SNCM skulle være en kriseramt virksomhed i den i rammebestemmelserne fastsatte betydning, og satte spørgsmålstegn ved SNCM's evne til at blive rentabel på de ikke-subventionerede ruter.
Disputing, first, that SNCM is an undertaking in difficulty within the meaning of the guidelines, CFF raises the question whether SNCM can become profitable on the non-subsidised routes.
CFF konstaterede desuden, at Livorno-ruten i modstrid med, hvad der blev oplyst i omstruktureringsplanen, stadig besejles.
Moreover, CFF notes that, contrary to what is stated in the restructuring plan, services are still operated to Livorno.
Med hensyn til spørgsmålet om omkostningsreduktionen beklagede CFF, at man ikke havde haft adgang til visse data i omstruktureringsplanen, som CFF's repræsentanter havde kritiseret.
On the subject of cost reduction, CFF regrets that it does not have access to particular parts of the restructuring plan about which its representatives have levelled criticism.
CFF var af den opfattelse, at de franske myndigheders beregning, der resulterede i et beløb på 76 mio. EUR, var fuldstændigt fiktiv, medens den gearing på 79 %, som de franske myndigheder nåede frem til, forekom CFF for høj.
CFF is of the view that the calculation by the French authorities resulting in the sum of EUR 76 million is purely notional while the capital to debt ratio of 79 % decided upon by the French authorities seems exaggerated.
Hvad angik SNCM's kapitalandele, bemærkede CFF, at visse af datterselskaberne ikke var relevante for rederiets aktivitet.
So far as concerns SNCM’s shareholdings, CFF notes that some of the subsidiaries are of no relevance to the activities of the shipping company’s activities.
CFF konkluderede, at støtteplanen havde til formål at omgå cabotage-forordningen og gjorde udbuddet vedrørende trafikken til Korsika fra Marseille illusorisk.
CFF concludes that the planned aid circumvents the cabotage regulation and renders the invitation to tender for Marseilles to Corsica services meaningless.
CFF insisterede på, at den planlagte støtte ikke måtte resultere i et mere aggressivt kommercielt tilbud fra SNCM.
CFF emphasises that the planned aid should not result in facilitating a more aggressive commercial bid on the part of SNCM.
CFF foreslog, at der først blev ydet omstruktureringsstøtte i 2007, og kun såfremt SNCM skulle tabe det kommende udbud i 2006, idet det ifølge CFF var den eneste situation, der virkeligt ville bringe det offentlige rederi i vanskeligheder.
It suggests that restructuring aid should not be granted until 2007 and only if SNCM loses the next tender in 2006, which would be the only scenario that would genuinely put the public shipping company in difficulty.
Bemærkninger fra koncernen Stef-TFE
Comments of the Stef-TFE group
Koncernen Stef-TFE påpegede, at SNCM's kapitalinteresser i CMN burde vurderes som rent finansielle aktiver.
According to the Stef-TFE group, SNCM’s shares in CMN should be analysed as purely financial assets.
Ifølge Stef-TFE er CMN og SNCM indbyrdes uafhængige og konkurrerer på de andre ruter end dem, der udgår fra Marseille, også selv om de begge er kontraherende parter i public service-kontrakten.
According to the Stef-TFE group, CMN and SNCM are independent and in competition with each other on routes other than those from Marseilles, even though both are co-contractors under the public service delegation contract.
Det anføres i brevet, at Stef-TFE ville forpligte sig til »helt eller delvis at tilbagekøbe alle SNCM's aktier i CMN, men fortrinsvis samtlige aktier«, der ifølge koncernen anslås til en værdi af mellem 15 og 17 mio. EUR, såfremt Kommissionen på de betingelser, den fastsætter i sin endelige beslutning, måtte finde, »at et sådant salg er nødvendigt for at sikre balancen i omstruktureringsplanen«.
The letter states that the Stef-TFE group would undertake ‘to buy back all or part, and preferably all, of SNCM’s shares in CMN’, whose value it estimates at between EUR 15 and 17 million, if the Commission were to take the view, under conditions it might impose in its final decision, that ‘such a transfer is necessary to ensure that the restructuring plan is properly balanced’.
Bemærkninger fra repræsentanter for regional- og lokalforvaltninger
Comments of representatives of local authorities
Byen Marseilles' borgmester, formanden for Conseil Général (regionsrådet) i Bouches-du-Rhône og formanden for Conseil Général i Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur understregede SNCM's økonomiske betydning for regionens økonomi.
The mayor of the city of Marseille, the president of the general council of Bouches-du-Rhône and the president of the regional council of Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur pointed out the economic importance of SNCM’s role in the regional economy.
Formanden for Conseil Général i Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur tilføjede, at forudsætningerne for, at omstruktureringsplanen for SNCM kunne sikre virksomhedens levedygtighed, forekom at være til stede.
The president of the regional council of Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur added that the conditions for SNCM’s restructuring plan to guarantee viability appear to be satisfied.
Formanden for eksekutivkomitéen for Korsikas folkevalgte forsamling (Assemblée de Corse) havde fremsendt et referat af debatten i forsamlingen den 18. december 2002, i forbindelse med hvilken forsamlingen havde afgivet »en positiv udtalelse om planen for en rekapitalisering af SNCM«.
The president of the executive council of the Assembly of Corsica submitted a resolution of that assembly of 18 December 2002 at which that assembly issued ‘a favourable opinion’ regarding SNCM’s planned recapitalisation.
Bemærkninger fra Office des Transports de Corse
Comments of the Corsica Transport Office
Office des Transports de Corse (OTC) understregede, at udbuddet om public service-kontrakten kun havde resulteret i et enkelt bud, nemlig buddet fra konsortiet CMN-SNCM.
The Corsica Transport Office (OTC) emphasised that the tender issued for the public service delegation contract had resulted in only one bid being submitted, namely that of the CMN and SNCM group.