natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvis det var sandt, at udviklingen i importen fra Kina hang sammen med stigningen i efterspørgslen på EF-markedet, som CISA hævder, ville denne imports markedsandel have været stort set stabil og ikke været steget fra 1 % til 17 % i den betragtede periode.
If it were true that the development of Chinese imports was correlated to the increase in demand in the EC market as claimed by CISA, the market share of such imports would have remained substantially stable, and would not have increased from 1 % to 17 % during the period considered.
Den betydelige stigning i markedsandelen for importen fra Kina og denne imports udvikling, som fuldstændig adskiller sig fra udviklingen i markedsandelen for EF-erhvervsgrenen og alle andre importkilder, er et tydeligt tegn på, at andre elementer har bidraget til stigningen i importen fra Kina.
The substantial increase in the market share of the Chinese imports and its completely different evolution from the evolution of the market shares of the Community industry and any other import source, clearly point to the fact that other elements have underpinned the increase in Chinese imports.
Denne konklusion underbygges også af, at de kinesiske importpriser konsekvent har været meget lave og dumpede, jf. betragtning 63-65 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
This conclusion is further supported by the fact that Chinese imports have consistently taken place at very low dumped prices, as it had been explained in recitals 63 to 65 of the provisional Regulation.
Desuden behøver eksportørerne ikke have en koordineret strategi for at bevæge sig i retning af samme adfærd.
Moreover, there is no need for exporters to coordinate a strategy in order to converge towards a similar behaviour.
Når det står klart, at priser på et vist meget lavt niveau kan sikre markedsindtrængning, vil eksportørerne sandsynligvis vælge samme vellykkede markedsstrategi, uden at der er behov for nogen form for koordinering.
Once it becomes clear that to penetrate a market a certain very low level of prices is successful, a convergence towards such successful market strategy would probably take place without any need for exporters to coordinate.
Derfor afvises de i betragtning 66 omhandlede påstande, og konklusionerne i betragtning 114 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes hermed.
Therefore, the claims in recital 66 above are rejected and the findings in recital 114 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Det bør under alle omstændigheder bemærkes, at importen fra Kina af de grunde, der er omhandlet i betragtning 134, vil kunne betragtes som en truende skade, selv hvis mængden af import fra Kina skulle begynde at falde forholdsmæssigt mere end forbrugsnedgangen, da tilstedeværelsen af store mængder af kinesiske lavprisvarer i en situation med faldende forbrug vil udøve et kraftigt pres i nedadgående retning på det generelle prisniveau på markedet.
It is in any case worth noting that, for the reasons mentioned in recital 134 of the provisional Regulation, the level of Chinese imports might be considered as an element of threat of injury even in the case that volumes would start to decrease proportionally more than the decrease in consumption, since the presence itself of substantial volumes of low-priced Chinese goods in a context of decreasing consumption will exert an important downward pressure on the general level of prices in the market.
Ingen enkelt af de faktorer, der er omhandlet i grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 9, er nødvendigvis udslagsgivende ved vurderingen af, om der foreligger en trussel om skade.
In any case, no single factor mentioned in Article 3(9) of the basic Regulation can necessarily give decisive guidance on the existence of a threat of injury.
Alle faktorerne må derimod tages i betragtning samlet.
Rather, all the factors must be considered in their totality.
Påstanden afvises derfor, og konklusionerne i betragtning 115 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes hermed.
The claim is therefore rejected and the findings in recital 115 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Fri kapacitet hos eksportørerne
Availability of free capacity of the exporters
CISA hævdede, at analysen i betragtning 118 i forordningen om midlertidig told var baseret på oplysninger fra de eksportører i stikprøven, som var de mest eksportorienterede virksomheder, hvilket betyder, at deres oplysninger ikke afspejlede den generelle situation med hensyn til eksport fra Kina korrekt.
CISA claimed that the analysis in recital 118 of the provisional Regulation was based on data from the sampled exporters, which were the most export-oriented companies, so that their data would not reflect correctly the overall situation concerning exports from the PRC.
I stedet hævdes det, at andelen af den kinesiske eksport til EF set i forhold til den samlede kinesiske eksport, jf. betragtning 119 i forordningen om midlertidig told, var præget af en ny tendens i 2008, idet den faldt fra 15 % til 11 %.
Instead, it is claimed that the share of Chinese exports to the EC out of the total Chinese exports indicated in recital 119 of the provisional Regulation changed trend in 2008, decreasing from 15 % to 11 %.
Sluttelig blev der i analysen i betragtning 117-119 i forordningen om midlertidig told set bort fra udviklingen i efterspørgslen på hjemmemarkedet i Kina, som forventedes at kunne absorbere en betydelig del af de varer, der kan fremstilles ved hjælp af den eksisterende overkapacitet.
Finally, the analysis in recitals 117 to 119 of the provisional Regulation ignored the evolution in demand for the Chinese domestic market, which was forecast to absorb a significant part of the output generated by the existing overcapacity.
I den forbindelse blev der henvist til en række af den kinesiske regerings projekter og planer, som skal opretholde efterspørgslen på hjemmemarkedet.
In this respect, reference was made to a number of projects and plans by the Chinese government to sustain internal demand.
MOFCOM hævdede også, at udviklingen i efterspørgslen på hjemmemarkedet i Kina ikke var blevet undersøgt i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Mofcom also claimed that the development of the demand in the Chinese domestic market had not been examined in the provisional Regulation.
Konklusionerne vedrørende virksomhederne i stikprøven i betragtning 118 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes helt klart af de i betragtning 119 i forordningen om midlertidig told omhandlede tendenser for de generelle eksportdata, som viste en endnu mere markant stigning i eksporten til EF i den betragtede periode.
The findings relating to the sampled companies in recital 118 of the provisional Regulation are clearly confirmed by the trends in the general export data referred to in recital 119 of the provisional Regulation, which showed an even more significant increase in the trend of exports to the EC for the period considered.
Hvad angår den forventede ændring af den stigende tendens i andelen af eksport til EF, set i forhold til den samlede kinesiske eksport af den pågældende vare i 2008, forelagde CISA ikke afgørende beviser til støtte for denne påstand.
As for the supposed reversal of the increasing trend in exports to the EC as regards the total Chinese exports of the product concerned in 2008, CISA failed to submit any decisive supporting evidence of its claim.
I den forbindelse skal det bemærkes, at dataene fra de kinesiske statistikker klart vedrører en varegruppe, der afviger væsentligt fra den pågældende vare. Dette fremgår klart af det faktum, at eksporten til Europa ifølge disse statistikker ikke blot er meget større end den import, der registreres af Eurostat for den pågældende vare, men udviklingen i den er også helt anderledes.
In this respect, it should be noted that the data resulting from Chinese statistics clearly refer to a product scope significantly different from the product concerned; this clearly appears from the fact that exports to Europe, as shown in these statistics, are not only much more than the imports registered in Eurostat for the product concerned, but their evolution also shows a completely different trend.
Den forelagte dokumentation kunne derfor ikke accepteres.
The evidence provided could therefore not be accepted.
Hvad angår de tiltag, som den kinesiske regering planlægger for at stimulere efterspørgslen på hjemmemarkedet, kan de forelagte beviser ikke ændre analysen, da virkningerne for efterspørgslen ikke kan fastslås med sikkerhed.
As for the projected actions by the Chinese government to stimulate internal demand, the evidence submitted cannot alter the analysis since the effects on demand cannot be established reliably.
Desuden er det for størstedelen af de nævnte projekters vedkommende usikkert, om de vil blive gennemført.
Moreover, it is unclear for most of the projects mentioned that they will be completed.
Sluttelig synes en række af de store rørledningsprojekter, som CISA henviser til, at være projekter, hvor der anvendes svejsede rør og ikke de sømløse rør, som er genstand for nærværende procedure.
Finally, some large pipeline projects referred to by CISA seem to be projects built with large welded pipes and not with the seamless pipes that are the subject of the present proceeding.
Påstandene i betragtning 69 afvises derfor.
The claims in recital 69 above are therefore rejected.
CISA var også af den opfattelse, at scenariet for omdirigering i betragtning 119 i forordningen om midlertidig told var misforstået, fordi den kinesiske eksport til USA hovedsageligt vil bestå af varer (OCTG-rør), som ikke importeres til EF i stort omfang.
CISA also considered that the re-direction scenario indicated in recital 119 of the provisional Regulation was misplaced because the Chinese exports to the USA would mainly consist of products (OCTG) not widely imported in the EC.
CISA hævdede også, at priserne ved salg til EF ikke nødvendigvis var lavere end ved salg til andre lande, men at EF derimod har været et attraktivt marked for den kinesiske eksport hidtil.
CISA also claimed that prices to the EC were not necessarily lower than in other countries but, on the contrary, the EC has been an attractive market for Chinese exports so far.
Over for denne påstand må det anføres, at analysen i betragtning 119 i forordningen om midlertidig told var baseret på statistiske oplysninger, som ikke er opdelt efter specifikke varetyper.
As regards this claim, it must be stated that the analysis carried out in recital 119 of the provisional Regulation was based on statistical data which does not contain detailed reference to specific product types.
Det bør under alle omstændigheder bemærkes, at det produktionsudstyr, der er nødvendigt for fremstilling af den pågældende vare, i vidt omfang kan anvendes til fremstilling af forskellige typer sømløse rør.
In any case, it should be noted that the production equipment necessary to manufacture the product concerned can, to a very large extent, be used for the production of various product types of seamless pipes and tubes.
Selv hvis specifikke rørtyper som f.eks. OCTG-rør ikke importeres til EF i stort omfang, er dette således ikke relevant for overvejelserne vedrørende eventuel ledig kapacitet, da det udstyr, der anvendes til fremstilling af denne rørtype, let kan omstilles til fremstilling af andre typer af den pågældende vare, som importeres til EF-markedet i langt større mængder.
Therefore, even if a specific type of tube like OCTG is not extensively imported in the EC, this fact is not relevant for the consideration of potentially available free capacities since the equipment used for manufacturing this type of tube can easily be switched to produce other types of the product concerned, which are imported in much more substantial quantities into the EC market.
Derfor afvises de i betragtning 66 omhandlede påstande, og konklusionerne i betragtning 117-119 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes hermed.
Therefore, the claims in recital 66 above are rejected and the findings in recitals 117 to 119 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
CISA hævdede, at priserne på importen fra Kina er steget betragteligt efter UP, mens EF-erhvervsgrenens priser ikke har fulgt samme tendens, hvilket skulle indebære, at det underbud, der fandt sted i UP, var blevet mindsket betragteligt eller endog bragt til ophør i perioden efter UP.
CISA claimed that, after the IP, prices of Chinese imports have increased substantially whilst prices of the Community industry have not followed the same trend, so that the undercutting existing during the IP would have been substantially reduced or even eliminated in the period after the IP.
Som anført i betragtning 98 og 122 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes det, at priserne på import fra forskellige kilder, herunder fra Kina, i lighed med EF-erhvervsgrenens priser steg betragteligt efter UP.
As already indicated in recitals 98 and 122 of the provisional Regulation, it is confirmed that after the IP the prices of imports from various sources, including from the PRC, increased substantially, as did the prices of the Community industry.
Der er blevet gennemført en analyse af EF-erhvervsgrenens prislister efter UP og af priserne for sammenlignelige varer importeret fra Kina, og denne viser, at prisudsvingene følger samme mønster.
An analysis of the price lists of Community industry after the IP and of the prices of comparable products imported from the PRC has been carried out, and has shown that there has been a parallelism in price movements.
Det kan konkluderes, at der ikke blev fundet beviser til støtte for påstanden om, at det underbud, der blev konstateret i UP, er blevet mindsket betragteligt eller endog bragt til ophør.
In conclusion, no evidence was found to support the allegation that the undercutting found during the IP would have been substantially reduced or even be eliminated.
Konklusionerne i betragtning 120-123 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes derfor hermed.
The findings in recitals 120 to 123 of the provisional Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Lagerbeholdningernes størrelse
Level of inventories
Da der ikke blev fremsat bemærkninger om dette punkt, bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 124 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any comments on this point, the findings in recital 124 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Dette støtter helt klart konklusionerne i betragtning 125 i forordningen om midlertidig told, og påstanden afvises derfor.
This fact clearly supports the finding in recital 125 of the provisional Regulation and the claim is therefore rejected.
Det skal først og fremmest bemærkes, at konklusionen om trussel om skade er blevet truffet under hensyntagen til bl.a. de forskellige faktorer i deres helhed, der er omhandlet i grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 5 og 9.
It is first of all noted that the finding of threat of injury has been made after taking into consideration, inter alia, the totality of the various factors referred to in Article 3(5) and 3(9) of the basic Regulation.
CISA hævdede, at konklusionerne i forordningen om midlertidig told ikke var i overensstemmelse med de standarder, som WTO har fastlagt for denne undersøgelsestype, dvs. at konklusionerne skal baseres på beviser og ikke blot påstande, formodninger og fjerne muligheder, og at prognoser og antagelser skal have en høj grad af sandsynlighed, samt at alternative forklaringer vedrørende en given konklusion skal undersøges.
CISA claimed that the findings in the provisional Regulation had not complied with the standards required by the WTO for this type of investigation, i.e., that the findings should be supported by evidence and not be the result of allegation, conjecture or remote possibility; that the projections and assumptions should show a high degree of likelihood; and that alternative explanations in arriving to a given conclusion should be examined.
Grundlaget for konklusionerne vedrørende undersøgelsens forskellige elementer fremgår klart af forordningen om midlertidig told.
The provisional Regulation indicates clearly on which basis the findings relating to the various elements of the investigation have been established.
Dette blev dokumenteret ved hjælp af bl.a.: statistiske oplysninger fra Eurostat, besvarelser af spørgeskemaet fra de samarbejdsvillige virksomheder, oplysninger fra klageren om virksomheder, der ikke indgår i stikprøven, oplysninger, som var indeholdt i de berørte parters bemærkninger, og andre oplysninger, som er fundet på internettet i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
This was supported by the evidence indicated, such as: statistical data sourced from Eurostat, questionnaire replies by cooperating companies, information on non-sampled companies provided by the complainant, information contained in submissions made by interested parties, other information found on the Internet in the course of the investigation.
De berørte parter har haft adgang til alle disse oplysninger, for så vidt at de ikke var fortrolige.
All this information, where non-confidential, has been open to consultation by interested parties.
Elementerne vedrørende undersøgelsen af trussel om skade er blevet behandlet separat og meget nøje i forordningen om midlertidig told, og nøjagtigheden af antagelserne og prognoserne fra den foreløbige fase blev i videst muligt omfang genundersøgt og efterprøvet i undersøgelsens endelige fase, jf. konklusionerne i denne forordning.
The elements relating to the threat of injury examination have been considered separately and in detail in the provisional Regulation and the degree of materialisation of the assumptions and forecasts made at the provisional stage was re-examined and verified — to the extent possible — at the definitive stage of the investigation, as set out in the findings in this Regulation.
Der blev ikke fundet kendsgerninger, beviser eller indikationer, som er i modstrid med konklusionerne i forordningen om midlertidig told.
No facts, evidence or indication was found that would contradict the findings contained in the provisional Regulation.
Prognoserne og antagelserne i forordningen om midlertidig told var derfor ikke formodninger eller påstande, men resultatet af en grundig analyse af situationen.
Therefore, the projections and assumptions contained in the provisional Regulation were not conjectures or allegations, but the result of a thorough analysis of the situation.
De i betragtning 78 omhandlede alternative forklaringer og fortolkninger — herunder også de alternative forklaringer og fortolkninger, der fremgik af de berørte parters bemærkninger — er blevet behørigt undersøgt i forbindelse med undersøgelsen og blevet behandlet i denne forordning samt i forordningen om midlertidig told.
As for the alternative explanations and interpretations referred to in recital 78 above, including those presented by interested parties in their submissions, they have been duly examined during the investigation and addressed in this Regulation as well as in the provisional Regulation.
Da der ikke er fremsat nogen specifikke bemærkninger, bekræftes betragtning 128-135 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any specific comments, recitals 128 to 135 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
CISA hævdede, at EF-erhvervsgrenens import af den pågældende vare fra Kina og andre lande viste, at den ikke havde kapacitet til at imødekomme efterspørgslen på EF-markedet.
CISA claimed that the fact that Community industry imported the product concerned from the PRC and other countries demonstrated they did not have the capacity to meet the demand in the Community market.
Dette skyldtes, at EF-erhvervsgrenen ikke havde investeret i ny produktionskapacitet og i stor stil havde fokuseret på varer i den højere prisklasse.
This was because the Community industry had not invested in new production capacity and concentrated heavily on the higher value segments of the market.
I den forbindelse bør der mindes om, at det i betragtning 136 i forordningen om midlertidig told blev forklaret, at det skønnes, at denne import udgør mindre end 2 % af den samlede import fra Kina, og der blev ikke forelagt dokumentation for, at denne andel var højere.
In this respect, it should be recalled that it was explained in recital 136 of the provisional Regulation that such imports were estimated to be less than 2 % of the total imports from the PRC, and no evidence was provided to prove that this amount was higher.
CISA satte også spørgsmålstegn ved de nøjagtige årsager til, at den i betragtning 138 i forordningen om midlertidig told omhandlede virksomhedsgruppe var nødt til at foretage nævnte import.
CISA also questioned the exact reasons why the company group mentioned in recital 138 of the provisional Regulation had to carry out the mentioned imports.
Emnet blev undersøgt yderligere, og det bekræftes, at af hensyn til omkostningseffektiviteten havde andre ikke-europæiske enheder i gruppen stået for produktionen af visse varetyper.
The issue was further examined and it is confirmed that for reasons of cost efficiency, the production of certain product types had been carried out by other non-European entities of the group.
Som nævnt i betragtning 138 i forordningen om midlertidig told blev det verificeret, at denne import ikke var blevet foretaget til priser, der underbød priserne for samme varetyper i Fællesskabet.
As already mentioned in recital 138 of the provisional Regulation however, it was verified that such imports had not been at prices undercutting the Community price for the same product types.
Endelig påpegede CISA, at der tilsyneladende var uoverensstemmelse mellem den relativt positive prognose for EF-erhvervsgrenens fremtidige eksportsalg og de overordnede økonomiske tendenser for markeder i tredjelande, som derimod skulle blive præget af tilbagegang ifølge prognoserne.
CISA finally pointed to an apparent inconsistency between the relatively positive estimation of the Community industry concerning their future export sales and the general economic trends for third country markets, which were instead forecasted to decline.
I den forbindelse skal det bemærkes, at analysen af EF-erhvervsgrenens eksportaktivitet ikke har virkninger for fastsættelsen af skade eller trussel om skade, da denne udelukkende vedrører EF-erhvervsgrenens aktiviteter, for så vidt angår samme vare, på EF-markedet.
In this respect, it is to be noted that the analysis of the export activity of the Community industry does not have any effect on the determinations relating to injury or threat of injury, which exclusively concern the activity of the Community industry for the like product in the EC market.
Hvis nogle af EF-producenterne har set optimistisk på deres eksportaktiviteter, kan dette kun have medført en overvurdering af deres forventede overordnede økonomiske resultater, men ikke af deres resultater på hjemmemarkedet, da disse behandles separat i analysen.
If some of the Community producers have optimistic views about their export activities this may only have resulted in the overstatement of their forecasted general economic performance but not in their performance in the domestic market, which is kept separate in the analysis.
Påstandene i betragtning 83-85 ovenfor afvises derfor, og konklusionerne i betragtning 136-141 i forordningen om midlertidig told bekræftes hermed.
Therefore, the claims referred to in recitals 83 to 85 above are rejected and the findings contained in recitals 136 to 141 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
CISA hævdede desuden, at det ikke er tilstrækkeligt at undersøge gennemsnitspriserne for importen fra andre tredjelande uden for EU, og at disse varers nøjagtige karakter derimod også bør tages i betragtning.
Moreover, CISA claimed that it is not sufficient to examine the average price of imports from other non-EU third countries, but that the exact nature of these products should also be considered.
Det bekræftes, at der er blevet foretaget en detaljeret analyse i alle de tilfælde, hvor importørerne forelagde tilstrækkeligt detaljerede oplysninger om priserne.
It is confirmed that a detailed analysis has been carried out in all instances where sufficiently detailed information on prices was made available by importers.