natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Et sådant rimeligt grundlag indebærer også fradrag af den forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomheds SA&G og en rimelig fortjeneste.
Such reasonable basis will also cater for a deduction of the related company's SG&A and a reasonable profit.
Også selv om man måtte mene, at disse elementer mere passende afspejles som »provision«/»avance«, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra i), hvilket ikke er tilfældet, ville dumpingmargenen være den samme.
Even if it was considered that these elements are more appropriately reflected as ‘commissions’/‘mark-ups’ in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation, quod non, the resulting dumping margin would be the same.
Da den forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomheds fortjeneste var påvirket af de betingelser, der gælder for køb mellem virksomheder, blev der beregnet en rimelig fortjeneste på grundlag af data fra uafhængige importører/forhandlere, som samarbejdede i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
Since the profit of the related company was affected by the fact that it purchased under inter-company conditions, a reasonable profit was therefore determined on the basis of data gathered from independent importers/traders cooperating with the investigation.
Efter fremlæggelsen af oplysningerne hævdede EF-erhvervsgrenen, at uden eksport til Fællesskabet kan der i henhold til grundforordningen og WTO-reglerne ikke beregnes dumpingmargener.
Following disclosure, the Community industry claimed that the Basic Regulation and WTO law do not allow the calculation of dumping margins when there are no exports made to the Community.
I betragtning af de grunde, der er anført i ovenstående betragtninger, skal det på ny anføres, at i grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 9, hedder det udtrykkeligt, at foreligger der ingen eksportpris, kan eksportprisen beregnes på ethvert rimeligt grundlag.
For the reasons stated in the previous recitals, it is reiterated that Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation explicitly mentions that when there is no export price, such price may be constructed on any reasonable basis.
Derfor afvises påstanden.
Consequently, the claim is rejected.
Sammenligningen mellem den normale værdi beregnet som beskrevet ovenfor og eksportprisen, også beregnet som beskrevet ovenfor, viste, at der forelå dumping.
The comparison between the normal value calculated as described above and the export price also calculated as described above, showed the existence of dumping.
Dumpingmargenen for den ukrainske gruppe udtrykt som procent af cif-importprisen, Fællesskabets grænse, ufortoldet, er følgende:
The dumping margin for the Ukrainian group expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, is the following:
Interpipe Group (OJSC Interpipe Novomoskovsk Pipe Production Plant og OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsk Tube Rolling Plant): 10,7 %.
Interpipe Group (OJSC Interpipe Novomoskovsk Pipe Production Plant and OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsk tube rolling plant): 10,7 %.
Konklusioner om dumping vedrørende Ukraine
Conclusions on dumping regarding Ukraine
Konklusionen er, at der for Interpipe Group’s vedkommende blev konstateret dumping på det niveau, der er beskrevet i betragtning 199.
In conclusion, dumping by the Interpipe Group was found to exist at the level described in recital 199.
For alle andre eksporterende producenter i Ukraine ændres den gældende restdumpingmargen ikke.
As regards all other exporting producers in the Ukraine, the applicable residual dumping margin will not change.
UKRAINE (ii): ASPEKTER VEDRØRENDE ARTIKEL 11, STK. 2
UKRAINE (ii): ARTICLE 11(2) ASPECTS
Det pågældende lands eksport til EU er faldet støt fra 29 KT i 2002 til 17,2 KT i 2005 og var næsten nul i undersøgelsesperioden.
The exported volumes from the country concerned to the EU have steadily decreased from 29 KT in 2002 to 17,2 KT in 2005 to nearly nil in the IP.
Kun to ukrainske producenter i samme gruppe (Interpipe Group) gav sig til kende og indsendte et udfyldt spørgeskema, dvs. OJSC Interpipe Novomoskovsk Pipe Production Plant og OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsk Tube Rolling Plant.
Only two Ukrainian producers belonging to the same group (the Interpipe Group) made themselves known and submitted a questionnaire reply, OJSC Interpipe Novomoskovsk Pipe Production Plant and OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsk Tube Rolling Plant.
Det blev konstateret, at mindst 7 andre producenter opererede i Ukraine.
It was established that there were at least another 7 producers operating in Ukraine.
Ifølge Kommissionens oplysninger tegner Interpipe Group sig for ca. 26 % af Ukraines produktion.
On the basis of the information available to the Commission, the Interpipe Group accounts for around 26 % of the Ukrainian production.
Under disse omstændigheder fandt Kommissionen, at samarbejdsniveauet var meget lavt.
Under these conditions, it is considered that the level of cooperation was very low.
Den enkeltstående ukrainske producent, der samarbejdede i forbindelse med undersøgelsen, havde en ubetydelig eksport til Fællesskabet i løbet af undersøgelsesperioden.
The single cooperating Ukrainian group producer had negligible exports to the Community during the IP.
Ukraines eksport til Fællesskabet af den pågældende vare var meget beskeden og ikke repræsentativ, og kunne derfor ikke bruges som et pålideligt og meningsfyldt grundlag til at bestemme, om dumpingen fortsatte.
The very low level of Ukrainian exports of the product concerned to the Community was not representative and thus did not provide a reliable and meaningful basis for establishing whether there was a continuation of dumping.
Det blev derfor i denne sammenhæng anset for hensigtsmæssigt at basere analysen på sandsynligheden af fornyet dumping, hvis foranstaltningerne ophæves.
It was therefore considered appropriate to base the analysis in this case on the likelihood of recurrence of dumping should measures be terminated.
Som beskrevet i betragtning 203 fremgår det af undersøgelsen, at der var mindst syv producenter af den pågældende vare i Ukraine i undersøgelsesperioden og kun en, der samarbejdede i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
As outlined in recital 203, the investigation has shown that there were at least 7 producers of the product concerned in Ukraine during the IP and only one group cooperated in the investigation.
Man undersøgte, i hvilket omfang data fra denne ene ukrainske gruppe kunne bruges til at analysere den generelle udvikling af den sandsynlige eksport fra Ukraine og mere specifikt som benchmark, dvs. som indikator for priser på hjemmemarkedet og eksportpriser, omkostninger, produktionskapacitet og kapacitetsudnyttelse.
It was examined to what extent data from the one cooperating Ukrainian group could be used for the purpose of analysing the overall development of likely exports from Ukraine as well as, more specifically, to serve as a benchmark in terms of indicators of domestic and export prices, costs, production capacities and capacity utilisation.
Virksomhedens information om lagre, produktionsniveau og -kapacitet er sammen med data fra klageren blevet brugt til at fastlægge de ukrainske producenters produktionsmængde og -kapacitet.
The information pertaining to stocks, production level and capacity that was provided by the company has been used in conjunction with data from the complaint in order to establish the production volume and capacity of Ukrainian producers.
Produktion, uudnyttet kapacitet og sandsynlighed for, at denne kapacitet vil blive rettet mod Fællesskabet
Production, unused capacities and likelihood that these capacities would be directed to the Community.
På grundlag af de oplysninger, Kommissionen har haft adgang til, blev det fastslået, at produktionskapaciteten i Ukraine for den pågældende vare er over 400 KT årligt.
Based on the information available to the Commission, it was established that production capacity of the product concerned in the Ukraine exceeds 400 KT per year.
Da der ikke foreligger dokumentation for, at denne kapacitet kan absorberes via øget salg på hjemmemarkedet, salg til andre tredjelande eller produktion af andre varer end den pågældende vare, konkluderes det, at denne betydelige uudnyttede kapacitet, hvis foranstaltningerne udløber, efter al sandsynlighed ville blive rettet mod Fællesskabet, ikke mindst på grund af, at det er et meget attraktivt eksportmarked.
In the absence of evidence showing that this capacity could be absorbed by increased domestic sales, sales to other third countries or the production of products other than the product concerned, it is concluded that should measures expire, significant spare capacities would in all likelihood be directed towards the Community, not least because of the Community's attractiveness as an export market.
Dette underbygges yderligere af den store uudnyttede kapacitet hos Interpipe Group.
This is further confirmed by the significant spare capacity existing at the Interpipe Group.
Da Fællesskabets marked er et af verdens største, er det alene derfor attraktivt for alle ukrainske eksporterende producenter af den pågældende vare.
Considering that the Community market is one of the biggest in the world, its sheer size makes it attractive to any Ukrainian exporting producer of the product concerned.
Som bekendt leverer Interpipe Group coils fra Ukraine til produktionsvirksomheden Mogilev i Belarus, som på grundlag af en forarbejdningsaftale forædler varen til den pågældende vare, som Interpipe’s schweiziske datterselskab så sælger til Fællesskabet.
It is recalled that the Interpipe Group supplies coils from Ukraine to the manufacturing company Mogilev in Belarus, which transforms the product on a toll manufacturing basis into the product concerned, which is then sold by Interpipe's Swiss subsidiary to the Community.
I hele denne proces ejer Interpipe varen.
Throughout the process, Interpipe maintains ownership of the product.
Som nævnt ovenfor er der konstateret dumping i forbindelse med denne eksport.
As mentioned above, these exports have been found to be dumped.
Navnlig da der er stillet forslag om at indføre foranstaltninger over for Belarus, kan det ikke udelukkes, at en vis del af gruppens eksport fra Belarus i stedet vil ske fra Ukraine.
Especially since it is proposed to impose measures on Belarus, it cannot be excluded that certain exports made by the group from Belarus would be sourced instead from Ukraine.
Sammen med det relativt attraktive prisniveau i Fællesskabet og de veludviklede distributionskanaler finder Kommissionen, at der uden foranstaltninger vil være et klart økonomisk incitament til at flytte eksporten fra tredjemarkeder såsom Rusland eller Belarus over til Fællesskabets marked.
Taken together with the relatively attractive price level in the Community, where well developed distribution channels exist, it is considered that, in the absence of measures, there would be a clear economic incentive for a shift of exports away from third markets such as Russia or Belarus and towards the Community.
Under disse omstændigheder finder Kommissionen, at en forøgelse af den nuværende kapacitetsudnyttelse sandsynligvis vil blive rettet mod eksport og specifikt mod Fællesskabets marked.
Overall, under these circumstances, it is considered that any increase in the current capacity utilisation is likely to be directed towards exports, and specifically to the Community market.
I en situation med lav samarbejdsvilje og i lyset af ovenstående oplysninger finder Kommissionen, at påstandene i klagen vedrørende sandsynligheden af, at der fortsat vil blive foretaget dumping, er bekræftet.
In a context of low cooperation and of the information mentioned above, it is considered that the allegations made in the complaint as to likelihood of recurrence of dumping should be confirmed.
Dette underbygges yderligere af flere andre faktorer.
This is further supported by additional factors.
Eksportpriserne til tredjelande ligger på samme niveau som de almindelige importpriser i Fællesskabet.
The export prices to other third countries are at the same level as that of the prevailing import prices in the Community.
Derfor er det sandsynligt, at eksportpriser til disse tredjelande også dumpes, hvilket peger i retning af et mere generelt adfærdsmønster baseret på dumping.
This would imply that it is likely that export prices to such other third countries are also dumped, pointing to a more general pattern of behaviour based on dumping.
For den undersøgte vare, som generelt er temmelig ensartet, ville eventuelle ukrainske sælgere sandsynligvis sælge varer til de gældende priser for anden import i Fællesskabet.
In addition for the product under consideration, which is in general rather homogeneous, would-be Ukrainian sellers would be likely to provide products at the prevailing prices of other imports in the Community.
Da de potentielle eksportpriser på ukrainske eksportvarer sandsynligvis bliver nødt til at afspejle disse lave priser, er det i betragtning af den pågældende vares omkostningsstruktur, der i høj grad er baseret på priserne på zink og coils af stål, som er steget betydeligt i hele verden, sandsynligt, at varerne sælges til eksport til dumpingpriser, ca. 10,7 % lavere som konkluderet i betragtning 199.
When considering that potential export prices of Ukrainian producing exports are likely to have to mirror these low prices and when considering the cost structure of the product concerned, which is heavily based on steel coil and zinc prices that have seen significant increases across the world, it would be likely that export prices would be dumped at around 10,7 % as concluded in recital 199.
En betydelig del af den ukrainske eksport vil derfor sandsynligvis blive solgt til dumpingpriser i Fællesskabet, hvis foranstaltningerne får lov til at udløbe.
A significant amount of Ukrainian exports would therefore be likely to be sold in the Community at dumped prices should measures be allowed to lapse.
SKADEASPEKTER (ANTIDUMPINGUNDERSØGELSE, UDLØBSUNDERSØGELSE, FORNYET UNDERSØGELSE VEDRØRENDE TYRKIET)
INJURY ASPECTS (ANTI-DUMPING INVESTIGATION, EXPIRY REVIEW, TURKEY INTERIM REVIEW)
DEFINITION AF FÆLLESSKABETS ERHVERVSGREN OG FÆLLESSKABETS PRODUKTION
DEFINITION OF THE COMMUNITY INDUSTRY AND COMMUNITY PRODUCTION
I Fællesskabet konstaterede Kommissionen, at samme produkt blev fremstillet af 17 virksomheder, som samarbejdede i forbindelse med undersøgelsen og understøttede klageren, og to fællesskabsproducenter, som ikke samarbejdede i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
Within the Community, it was found that the like product was manufactured by 17 companies which cooperated with the investigation and supported the complaint and 2 Community producers that did not cooperate with the investigation.
Ingen producenter i Fællesskabet gav sig til kende eller modsatte sig undersøgelsen.
No Community producer came forward and opposed the investigation.
Da to producenter i Fællesskabet ikke samarbejdede, blev Fællesskabets produktion fastlagt på grundlag af information fra klageren og oplysninger indhentet i forbindelse med undersøgelsen fra de samarbejdsvillige producenter.
In the absence of the cooperation of 2 producers in the Community, the Community production was established on information submitted in the complaint and the information collected during the investigation from the cooperating producers.
De 17 samarbejdsvillige EF-producenter tegnede sig for 95 % af den samlede produktion af den pågældende vare i Fællesskabet.
The 17 cooperating Community producers accounted for 95 % of the total production in the Community of the product concerned.
De blev betragtet som udgørende Fællesskabets erhvervsgren som omhandlet i grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 1.
They were deemed to constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
De udtagne producenter i Fællesskabet tegnede sig for ca. 67 % af Fællesskabets erhvervsgrens produktion af samme vare i undersøgelsesperioden.
The sampled Community producers in the investigation accounted for around 67 % of the production of the like product of the Community industry during the investigation period.
Forbruget af den pågældende vare blev fastlagt på grundlag af den mængde på Fællesskabets marked, der blev solgt af alle producenter i Fællesskabet, plus import fra de pågældende lande og tredjelande.
The consumption of the product concerned on the Community market was established on the basis of the volume of sales on the Community market of all producers within the Community plus imports from the countries concerned as well as third countries.
For Fællesskabets producenter blev salgsmængden fastlagt ved hjælp af oplysninger fra Fællesskabets erhvervsgren sammen med oplysninger i klagen om de to ikke-samarbejdsvillige producenters salg i Fællesskabet.
In respect of the Community producers, the sales volumes were ascertained by using the information from the responses of the Community industry together with the information available in the complaint for the Community sales of the two non-cooperating producers.
Importmængden fra de berørte lande og tredjelande blev fastlagt ud fra følgende informationskilder:
As to the volumes of imports from countries concerned and third countries, the following sources of information were examined:
fuldstændige KN-kodedata fra Eurostat
full CN code data from Eurostat,
andre fortrolige statistiske data fra Kommissionen
other statistical information of a confidential nature available to the Commission,
information om import fra interesserede parter.
information on imports available from interested parties.
Ifølge klageren bør der desuden ikke foretages fradrag i KN-kodedata for varer, som ikke var den pågældende vare, fordi der ikke er importeret særlige mængder af andre varer under disse KN-koder.
In addition, according to the complaint, no deduction should be made to the CN Code data, to cover products which were not the product concerned because no significant quantities of other products have been imported under these CN codes
På dette grundlag blev det konkluderet, at den mest hensigtsmæssige kilde til fastlæggelse af udviklingen i mængder og priser for hele den undersøgte periode var fuldstændige KN-koder.
On this basis, it was concluded that, for the purposes of establishing volume and price trends for the whole period under consideration, full CN Codes were the most adequate source.
Følgende bemærkninger er relevante i denne sammenhæng.
The following comments are useful in this context.
For Belarus: Da der ikke findes andre oplysninger vedrørende priser, som dækker hele den undersøgte periode, finder Kommissionen efter analysen af prisniveauer ud fra data fra Eurostat og den ovenfor nævnte tyske erhvervsdrivende, at Eurostats statistik er den mest nøjagtige kilde til at afdække tendenser for priser.
For Belarus, in the absence of other information regarding prices and covering the full period under consideration and after analysing the price levels emanating from Eurostat and those from the German operator mentioned above, it is considered that Eurostat statistics are the most accurate source for the trends in prices.
For Kina fastslog undersøgelsen, at importen til EU fra de samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter var større, end det fremgik af importstatistikken som nævnt i tabel 2 (nedenfor).
For China the investigation established that imports to the EU market from the cooperating exporting producers were higher than the import statistics as mentioned in table 2 (below).
Da prisniveauerne i de to datasæt svarede til hinanden, blev det, for at sikre, at tallene ikke er ansat for højt, besluttet at bruge officielle statistikker, ikke mindst fordi dette ikke havde nogen betydelig indvirkning på analysen af skaden og årsagssammenhængen i forhold til at bruge data fra de samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter.
Given that price levels were similar between the two sets of data, and in order to ensure that the figures are not overstated, it was decided that official statistics would be used, not least because this approach had no material impact on the analysis of injury and causation, when compared to using the data obtained from the cooperating exporting producers.
Eftersom de tyrkiske samarbejdsvillige eksportørers eksport var større, end det fremgik af Eurostats data, er situationen den samme for Tyrkiet.
Considering that Turkish imports from the cooperating exporters were higher than shown by Eurostat data, a similar reasoning applies to Turkey.
Heller ikke her havde denne metode en større indvirkning på analysen af skade og årsagssammenhæng i forhold til at bruge data fra de samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter.
Again, this approach had no material impact on the analysis of injury and causation, when compared to using the data obtained from the cooperating exporting producers.
Forbruget som fastsat ovenfor (»EF-forbruget«) steg med 9 % i den undersøgte periode, dvs. fra 1234 KT i 2004 til 1342 KT i undersøgelsesperioden.
The consumption established as outlined above (‘Community consumption’) increased by 9 % during the period under consideration, i.e. from 1234KT tonnes in 2004 to 1342KT tonnes during the IP.
Mere specifikt faldt EF-forbruget 12 % i 2005, men steg så igen i 2006 og i undersøgelsesperioden.
More specifically, the Community consumption shows a decrease by 12 % in 2005 before increasing again in 2006 and during the IP.
Faldet i forbrug i 2005 kan tilskrives (grossisternes) nedbringelse af lagre (og derfor reducerede indkøb) i 2005 efter øgede indkøb i 2004.
The drop in consumption for the year 2005 is attributable to destocking (and therefore decreased purchasing) by the stockists in 2005 after increased purchases in 2004.
EU’s forbrug (ton)
EU Consumption (Tonnes)
IMPORT FRA DE PÅGÆLDENDE LANDE OG FRA TREDJELANDE
IMPORTS FROM THE COUNTRIES CONCERNED AND FROM THE THIRD COUNTRIES
For de lande, der var omfattet af antidumpingundersøgelsen, dvs. Belarus, Folkerepublikken Kina og Rusland, blev det undersøgt, om det var muligt at foretage en kumulativ analyse af hele importen.
For the anti-dumping investigation countries, i.e. Belarus, the People's Republic of China and Russia it was examined whether the conditions were such so as to allow for an analysis of all imports to be cumulated.
På grund af minimaldumping blev eksporten fra Bosnien-Hercegovina i stedet taget i betragtning under anden eksport i afsnit 3.4 og under andre årsager i afsnit 4.
With below de minimis dumping, exports from Bosnia and Herzegovina were instead considered under other exports in section 3.4 as well as under other causes below in section 4.
Importen fra de lande, der er omfattet af udløbsundersøgelsen, og fra Tyrkiet (i forbindelse med den fornyede undersøgelse vedrørende Tyrkiet) blev analyseret særskilt.
The imports from the expiry review countries and from Turkey (in the context of the Turkey interim review) were analysed separately.
I den forbindelse skal der mindes om, at dumpingniveauerne for Tyrkiet var under bagatelgrænsen, og at importmængderne for Thailand og Ukraine samlet og enkeltvis også var under bagatelgrænsen.
In this context it is recalled that dumping levels for Turkey were below the de minimis threshold and that the imports volumes as concern Thailand and Ukraine together and separately also were de minimis.
Men for sidstnævnte to lande er der konstateret sandsynlighed for fornyet skadevoldende dumping, jf. afsnit F.
However, for the latter two countries a likelihood of recurrence of injurious dumping has been found, as is set out in section F below.
Kommissionen undersøgte, om import til dumpingpriser af den pågældende vare med oprindelse i Belarus, Kina og Rusland burde vurderes kumulativt i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 4.
The Commission examined whether dumped imports of the product concerned originating in Belarus, the People's Republic of China and Russia, should be assessed cumulatively in accordance with Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation.