natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Derfor måtte påstanden afvises, og der blev foretaget justeringer af eksportprisen for forskelle i provision i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra i), og for forskelle i forsendelsesomkostninger i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra e).
Therefore, the claim had to be dismissed and adjustments to the export price for a commission in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation and for transport in accordance with Article 2(10)(e) of the basic Regulation were made.
I denne sammenhæng blev der ved beregningen af provisionen taget hensyn til ENRC's SA&G-omkostninger ved salg af den pågældende vare produceret af Kazchrome og til ENRC's fortjenstmargen, som i dette tilfælde var baseret på oplysninger fra en ikke-forbundet importør, der samarbejdede med undersøgelsen.
In this context, in the calculation of the commission, the SG&A expenses incurred by ENRC to sell the product concerned produced by Kazchrome were taken into account, as well as a profit margin for ENRC, based, in this case, on that reported by an unrelated importer cooperating in the investigation.
For den ukrainske producent, der i sidste led solgte via en forretningsmæssigt forbundet forhandler i et tredjeland (jf. betragtning 69) blev der i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra i), foretaget en justering af eksportprisen for forskelle i provisioner i tilfælde, hvor der solgtes gennem denne forretningsmæssigt forbundne forhandler, idet forhandleren havde samme funktioner som en handelsagent på provisionsbasis.
For the Ukrainian producer ultimately selling via a related trader in a third country (see recital 69), an adjustment to the export price for a commission was made in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation, in the cases where sales were made through this related trader, as this trader had functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Kommissionen fandt, at den pågældende virksomhed, NFP, og den pågældende forretningsmæssigt forbundne forhandler, Steelex SA, var særskilte retlige enheder, som direkte og indirekte samarbejdede på køber/sælger-basis.
The company concerned, NFP, and the related trader in question, Steelex SA, were found to be separate legal entities and, directly or indirectly, to work on the basis of a buyer-seller relationship.
I denne sammenhæng blev der taget hensyn til Steelex's SA&G-omkostninger ved salg af den pågældende vare produceret af NFP og til en fortjenstmargen i henhold til oplysninger fra en ikke forbundet importør, der samarbejdede i undersøgelsen.
In this context, the SG&A expenses incurred by Steelex SA to sell the product concerned produced by NFP were taken into account, as well as a profit margin reported by an unrelated importer cooperating in the investigation.
Desuden lod NFP en del af sine salg til Fællesskabet ved Steelex SA gå gennem en ikke forbundet forhandler i et andet tredjeland.
Furthermore, NFP made part of its sales to the Community by Steelex SA through an unrelated trader located in another third country.
For disse salg blev det fundet hensigtsmæssigt foruden justeringer for provisionen til Steelex SA at foretage justeringer for provision til den ikke forbundne forhandler i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra i), idet også denne forhandler havde samme funktioner som en handelsagent på provisionsbasis.
For these sales, in addition to the commission for Steelex SA, it was found reasonable to make an adjustment for a commission for the unrelated trader in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation as this trader also had functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Provisionen blev beregnet på basis af den avance, der beregnedes af de pågældende salg.
This commission was established on the basis of its calculated mark-up on the sales in question.
En ukrainsk eksporterende producent ønskede en justering for valutaomregning, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra j).
One Ukrainian exporting producer claimed an adjustment for currency conversions, pursuant to Article 2(10)(j) of the basic Regulation.
Dette krav var baseret på forskellen i vekselkursen på fakturadatoen og betalingsdatoen.
This claim was based on the fluctuation between the exchange rate on the date of invoice and the exchange rate on the date of payment.
I denne henseende er det vigtigt at understrege, at fakturadatoen i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra j), betragtes som salgsdatoen, og den vekselkurs, der anvendes, bør derfor være den vekselkurs, der gælder på salgsdatoen.
In this respect, it is important to underline that the date of invoice is, in accordance with Article 2(10)(j) of the basic Regulation, considered to be the date of sale and the exchange rate to be applied should, thus, be the exchange rate prevailing at the date of sale.
Da ingen af de samarbejdende kinesiske eksporterende producenter blev indrømmet markedsøkonomisk eller individuel behandling, blev der fastsat en dumpingmargen for hele Kina ved anvendelse af en vægtningsfaktor for cif-prisen for hver gruppe eksporterende producenter, dvs. samarbejdsvillige producenter og ikke-samarbejdsvillige producenter.
In the absence of MET or IT being granted to any of the cooperating Chinese exporting producers, a countrywide dumping margin was calculated for the whole of the PRC using a weighting factor for the cif value of each group of exporters, i.e. cooperators and non-cooperators.
Således beregnedes først dumpingmargenen for de samarbejdsvillige kinesiske eksporterende producenter i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 11 og 12, på basis af en sammenligning mellem det vejede gennemsnit af den normale værdi for referencelandet efter varetype med det vejede gennemsnit af eksportpriserne efter varetype i henhold til ovenstående.
To this end, the dumping margin was firstly calculated for the cooperating Chinese exporting producers pursuant to Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value of the analogue country by product type with a weighted average export price by product type as established above.
Det skal bemærkes, at importen fra Kina bestod af såvel siliciummangan med normalt kulstofindhold og siliciummangan med lavt kulstofindhold.
It should be noted that the imports from the PRC consisted both of SiMn with normal carbon content and low-carbon SiMn.
Den samarbejdsvillige producent i referencelandet producerede imidlertid kun siliciummangan med normalt kulstofindhold.
However, the cooperating producer in the analogue country produced only the normal carbon content SiMn.
Derfor blev der kun anvendt data om denne almindelige varetype ved sammenligningen.
Therefore, only data concerning this common product type was used in the comparison.
Dernæst beregnedes dumpingmargenen for alle ikke-samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 18, stk. 1, på grundlag af de faktiske foreliggende oplysninger.
Secondly, the dumping margin was established for all non-cooperating exporting producers on the basis of the facts available, in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation.
Med henblik herpå blev den eksportmængde til Fællesskabet, som de samarbejdsvillige kinesiske eksporterende producenter havde opgivet, sammenlignet med den samlede importmængde med oprindelse i Kina, således som den fremgik af Eurostats importstatistikker.
To this end, the volume of exports to the Community reported by the cooperating Chinese exporting producers was compared with the total volume of imports originating in the PRC, as based on Eurostat import statistics.
Af denne sammenligning fremgik det, at den udviste samarbejdsvilje var lav, da de samarbejdsvillige producenters eksport repræsenterede mindre end 29 % af Fællesskabets samlede import af varer med oprindelse i Kina i undersøgelsesperioden.
This comparison indicated that the level of cooperation was low, since the exports by the cooperating producers represented less than 29 % of total Community imports from the PRC during the IP.
Derfor blev dumpingmargenen i forbindelse med eksporten fra ikke-samarbejdsvillige kinesiske eksporterende producenter beregnet på basis af den højeste konstaterede dumpingmargen for samarbejdende eksporterende producenter af siliciummangan med normalt kulstofindhold.
Therefore, the level of dumping for the export volumes of non-cooperating Chinese exporting producers was determined on the basis of the highest dumping margin established for the cooperating exporting producers for the normal carbon content SiMn.
Denne fremgangsmåde blev fundet hensigtsmæssig, eftersom der ikke var noget, der tydede på, at nogen ikke-samarbejdsvillig producent foretog dumping på et lavere niveau end den samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producent.
This approach was deemed appropriate since there were no indications that any non-cooperating producer was dumping at a lower level than the cooperating exporting producers.
Derfor blev der beregnet en gennemsnitlig dumpingmargen for landet som helhed, hvor cif-værdien for hver gruppe eksportører (samarbejdsvillige og ikke-samarbejdsvillige) blev benyttet som faktor ved vægtningen.
Therefore, a countrywide average dumping margin was calculated using as a weighting factor the cif value of each group of exporters, i.e. cooperating exporters and non-cooperating exporters.
På dette grundlag udgør den landsdækkende dumpingmargen udtrykt i procent af cif-importprisen, Fællesskabets grænse, ufortoldet, 60,1 %.
On this basis, the countrywide dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, is 60,1 %.
Af klagen og oplysningerne fra den eksporterende producent, der meldte sig, samt andre statistiske data fremgik det, at OJSC Kazchrome er den eneste kasakhiske eksporterende producent af siliciummangan.
Based on the complaint, the information available from the exporting producer which came forward and other statistical data it appeared that OJSC Kazchrome is the sole Kazakh exporting producer of silico-manganese.
Da der ikke var indikation for, at nogen eksporterende producenter med føje havde afstået fra at samarbejde, blev det fundet hensigtsmæssigt at fastsætte restdumpingmargenen på det niveau, der var fastsat for OJSC Kazchrome.
As no indications were found that any exporting producer deliberately abstained from cooperating it was considered appropriate to set the residual dumping margin at the same level as the level established for OJSC Kazchrome.
De fastsatte dumpingmargener udgør derfor følgende udtrykt i procent af cif-importprisen, Fællesskabets grænse, ufortoldet:
The dumping margins established, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, are therefore the following:
Alle andre virksomheder: 6,5 %.
All other companies: 6,5 %.
Ud fra klagen og oplysningerne fra de eksporterende producenter, der meldte sig, samt andre statistiske data, konkluderedes det, at graden af samarbejdsvilje var over 80 % for Ukraines vedkommende.
Based on the complaint, the information available from the exporting producers which came forward and other statistical data, it was concluded that the level of cooperation was above 80 % in the case of Ukraine.
Det blev derfor fundet hensigtsmæssigt at fastsætte restdumpingmargenen til niveauet for den højeste dumpingmargen, der var fastsat for en samarbejdsvillig eksporterende producent i det pågældende land.
Therefore, it was considered appropriate to set the residual dumping margin at the level of the highest dumping margin established for a cooperating exporting producer in the country concerned.
På dette grundlag udgør dumpingmargenerne udtrykt i procent af cif-importprisen, Fællesskabets grænse, ufortoldet, følgende:
On this basis, the dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, are the following:
alle andre virksomheder: 56,7 %.
All other companies: 56,7 %.
I 1998 indførtes der antidumpingforanstaltninger over for importen af siliciummangan med oprindelse i Kina og Ukraine (Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 495/98 [3].
In 1998, anti-dumping measures were imposed on imports of SiMn originating in the PRC and in Ukraine (Regulation (EC) No 495/98 [3]).
Disse foranstaltninger udløb i begyndelsen af marts 2003.
Those measures expired in early March 2003.
I begyndelsen af den betragtede periode var der således foranstaltninger i kraft over for importen fra to af de berørte lande.
Therefore, during the early part of the period considered there were measures in place on imports from two of the countries concerned.
Dette blev taget i betragtning i forbindelse med skadesanalysen.
This fact was taken into consideration when conducting the injury analysis.
Som angivet i betragtning 118 fremgår det klart af udviklingen i rentabiliteten, at ophævelsen af antidumpingforanstaltningerne i marts 2003 ikke i væsentlig grad indvirkede på EF-erhvervsgrenens situation i den følgende periode.
As indicated in recital 118 below, the evolution in respect of profitability clearly indicates that the removal of the anti-dumping measures in March 2003 did not influence significantly the situation of the Community industry during the following period.
Det konkluderes derfor, at året 2002 — i modsætning til påstandene fra visse interesserede parter — kan anvendes som grundlag for beregningen af de i betragtning 93-141 nævnte indekser.
It is therefore concluded that, contrary to the claim by some interested parties, the year 2002 can be considered as the basis for the calculation of the indices mentioned in recitals 93 to 141.
Der var en betragtelig stigning i efterspørgslen af stål på verdensplan, især i Asien, som begyndte i slutningen af 2003 og fortsatte i første halvdel af 2004.
There was a significant increase in demand for steel worldwide, but primarily in Asia, which began towards the end of 2003 and continued during the first half of 2004.
Dette i kombination med manglende produktionskapacitet for siliciummangan i Asien har resulteret i en øget efterspørgsel af siliciummangan på verdensplan og har ført til en hidtil uset prisstigning i løbet af 2004.
This, combined with production shortages of SiMn in Asia resulted in increased worldwide demand for SiMn, and led to an unprecedented increase in price during 2004.
I skadesanalysen er der taget hensyn til disse usædvanlige omstændigheder med henblik på at hindre, at de ikke får usaglig indflydelse på skadesbilledet.
In carrying out the injury analysis, account has been taken of these unusual circumstances, in order to ensure that they do not unduly affect the injury picture.
Inden for Fællesskabet fremstilles samme vare af fem producenter.
Within the Community, the like product is manufactured by five producers.
Af disse fem producenter erklærede i alt fire, som tilhører den klagende organisation, at de var interesseret i at samarbejde i proceduren inden for tidsfristen i indledningsmeddelelsen, og de samarbejdede korrekt i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
Of these five producers, a total of four, being members of the complaining association, declared their interest in cooperating in the proceeding within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation and properly cooperated with the investigation.
Det konstateredes, at disse fire producenter tegnede sig for en større del af EF-produktionen — i dette tilfælde ca. 88 % — af samme vare.
These four producers were found to account for a major proportion, in this case around 88 %, of the total Community production of the like product.
De fire samarbejdende producenter anses derfor for at udgøre erhvervsgrenen i Fællesskabet (i det følgende benævnt »EF-erhvervsgrenen«), jf. grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 1, og artikel 5, stk. 4.
The four cooperating producers therefore constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation and will be hereafter referred to as the ‘Community industry’.
Den resterende EF-producent vil herefter blive omtalt som »den resterende EF-producent«.
The remaining Community producer will be hereafter referred to as the ‘other Community producer’.
Den resterende EF-producent modsatte sig ikke klagen.
This other Community producer did not oppose the complaint.
EF-forbruget blev beregnet på basis af data indhentet fra Eurostat om EF-erhvervsgrenens produktionsmængde under hensyntagen til skiftende lagersituationer samt import- og eksportdata for EF-markedet, og for den resterende EF-producents vedkommende på basis af skøn foretaget af EF-erhvervsgrenens producenter.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the volumes of the Community industry's own production taking into account changes in stock levels, the import and export volumes data for the Community market obtained from Eurostat and, concerning the other Community producer, from estimations made by the Community industry producers.
Samlet EF-forbrug (t)
Total EC consumption (tonnes)
Indeks (2002 = 100)
Index (2002=100)
De dumpingmargener, der blev konstateret for importen fra hvert af de berørte lande, ligger over bagatelgrænsen; de importerede mængder fra hvert af disse lande er ikke ubetydelige, og det blev anset for hensigtsmæssigt at foretage en kumulativ vurdering på baggrund af konkurrencevilkårene mellem importen fra de berørte lande og den i Fællesskabet fremstillede samme vare.
The dumping margin found for each of the countries concerned was more than de minimis, the volume of imports from each of these countries was not negligible and the cumulative assessment could be considered appropriate in view of the conditions of competition between the imports from the countries concerned and the like Community product.
Lignende konkurrencevilkår fremgik af den omstændighed, at den pågældende vare, der blev importeret fra de berørte lande, og samme vare, der blev fremstillet og solgt af EF-erhvervsgrenen på EF-markedet, var sammenlignelige og blev distribueret via samme handelskanaler.
These similar conditions of competition were evidenced by the fact that the product concerned imported from the countries concerned and the like product produced and sold by the Community industry within the Community market were alike and distributed via the same trade channels.
Desuden var alle importmængder af en betydelig størrelse og medførte betydelige markedsandele.
Moreover, all import volumes were substantial and resulted in significant market shares.
I betragtning af, at der som nævnt i betragtning 104 ikke foreligger underbud i forbindelse med importen fra Ukraine, finder Kommissionen, at virkningerne af importen fra Ukraine bør vurderes særskilt.
However, in view of the absence of undercutting by imports from Ukraine as stated at recital 104, it is considered that the effect of imports from Ukraine should be assessed separately.
Den eksporterende producent i Kasakhstan fastholdt, at Kasakhstan ikke ved skadesvurderingen burde slås sammen med Kina på grund af sin diametralt forskellige markedsadfærd.
The exporting producer in Kazakhstan maintained that Kazakhstan should not be cumulated with the PRC for the purpose of the injury assessment, because of its diametrically different market behaviour.
Denne eksporterende producent hævdede blandt andet, at udviklingen i importen fra Kasakhstan, værdien heraf og markedsandelene i Fællesskabet var forskellige fra situationen for importen fra de andre berørte lande, og at produktmikset var anderledes.
This exporting producer argued inter alia that the evolution of Kazakh import volumes, values and market share for the Community was different from the other countries concerned and that there was a difference in product mix.
I denne forbindelse anerkendes det, at der i den betragtede periode kunne noteres et fald i importmængde og markedsandele for Kasakhstan (sidstnævnte var 5,8 % i 2002 og 4,6 % i undersøgelsesperioden).
In respect of this, it is acknowledged that there was during the period considered an overall decrease in the volume of imports and in market share in respect of Kazakhstan (the latter was 5,8 % in 2002 and 4,6 % during the IP).
Imidlertid var både mængde og markedsandel for importen fra Kasakhstan i de betragtede periode relativt stabil og befandt sig på et niveau, der ikke kan betegnes som ubetydeligt.
However, both the volume and market share of Kazakh imports during the period considered were relatively stable and were at levels which cannot be considered as insignificant.
Desuden har undersøgelsen vist, at prisudviklingen for importen fra Kasakhstan ikke adskiller sig betragteligt fra den, der kan noteres for importen fra de andre berørte lande.
In addition, the investigation has shown that the evolution of prices for Kazakh imports is not significantly different from that for imports from the other countries concerned.
Derfor — og også i lyset af overvejelserne i betragtning 73-75 — kan det ikke konkluderes, at der er tale om diametralt forskellig markedsadfærd, når det gælder importen fra Kina og Kasakhstan, og påstanden måtte derfor afvises.
Therefore, also in light of the considerations in recitals 73 to 75 it cannot be concluded that there is a diametrically different market behaviour between imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan and consequently the claim should be rejected.
Kommissionen fandt derfor på ovenstående baggrund, at alle kriterierne i grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 4, var opfyldt for Kinas og Kasakhstans vedkommende.
In the light of the above, it was considered that all the criteria set out in Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation were met in respect of the PRC and Kazakhstan.
Importen fra disse to berørte lande blev derfor undersøgt under et, mens importen fra Ukraine blev undersøgt særskilt.
The imports from those two countries concerned were therefore examined cumulatively, while imports from Ukraine were assessed separately.
Importmængden for den pågældende vare med oprindelse i Kina og Kasakhstan til Fællesskabet steg støt fra ca. 48000 t i løbet af 2002 til ca. 162000 t i løbet af 2004, før den atter faldt til ca. 96000 t i løbet af undersøgelsesperioden.
The volume of imports of the product concerned from the PRC and Kazakhstan into the Community increased steadily from around 48000 tonnes during 2002 to around 162000 tonnes during 2004, before decreasing to around 96000 tonnes during the IP.
Mellem 2002 og undersøgelsesperioden steg importmængden for varer fra disse lande med 99 %.
Between 2002 and the IP, the volume of imports from these countries increased by 99 %.
Importmængde fra Kina og Kasakhstan (t)
Volume of imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan (tonnes)
Markedsandel for importen fra Kina og Kasakhstan
Market share of imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan
Prisen på import fra Kina og Kasakhstan (EUR/t)
Price of imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan (EUR/tonne)
Importmængden for den pågældende vare fra Ukraine til Fællesskabet faldt en smule fra ca. 154000 t i løbet af 2002 til ca. 138000 t fra 2003 til 2004, før den atter steg til ca. 180000 t i løbet af 2005 og til 210000 t i undersøgelsesperioden.
The volume of imports of the product concerned from Ukraine into the Community decreased slightly from around 154000 tonnes during 2002 to around 138000 tonnes during 2003 and 2004, before increasing to around 180000 tonnes during 2005 and to around 210000 tonnes during the IP.
Mellem 2002 og undersøgelsesperioden steg importmængden for varer fra disse lande med 36 %.
Between 2002 and the IP, the volume of imports from these countries increased by 36 %.
Importmængde fra Ukraine (t)
Volume of imports from Ukraine (tonnes)
Prisen på import fra Ukraine (EUR/t)
Price of imports from Ukraine (EUR/tonne)
Markedsandelen for varer importeret fra Kina og Kasakhstan var i 2002 på 5,8 %.
The market share held by imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan stood at 5,8 % during 2002.
Den steg i 2003 og igen i 2004 og nåede dette år op på 17,0 %.
This increased in 2003 and again in 2004, reaching 17,0 % in that year.
I løbet af 2005 faldt markedsandelen lidt til 15,5 %, og den steg igen i undersøgelsesperioden til 10,4 %.
During 2005 the market share decreased slightly to 15,5 % and decreased again during the IP to 10,4 %.