natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Men i lyset af den utilstrækkelige repræsentativitet af hjemmemarkedssalget i de andre foreslåede lande og ligeledes i lyset af den begrænsede bredde af deres produktion kan man med rimelighed gå ud fra, at deres normale værdi ville skulle konstrueres, og at der ville have været behov for flere justeringer for at gøre modeller fra Thailand, Indonesien eller Indien sammenlignelige med modeller fremstillet i de berørte lande, end det var tilfældet for salgspriserne på det brasilianske hjemmemarked.
However, given the insufficient representativeness of the domestic sales of the other countries proposed and given also the likely thin range of their production, it can reasonably be assumed that their normal value would have to be constructed and that more adjustments would have been necessary to make Thai, Indonesian or Indian models comparable to those produced in the countries concerned than it was the case with the Brazilian domestic sales prices.
Selv om den økonomiske udvikling og indkomst pr. indbygger normalt anses for irrelevante, erindres der som nævnt i betragtning 115 i den midlertidige forordning om, at på grundlag af Verdensbankens hovedkriterier for klassificering af økonomier, som er bruttonationalindkomst pr. indbygger, klassificeres Brasilien i samme kategori som Kina, Thailand og Indonesien.
As regards the economic development and the income per capita, while they are normally deemed irrelevant, it is recalled as mentioned in recital 115 of the provisional Regulation that on the basis of the World Bank's main criteria for classifying economies is gross national income per capita, Brazil is classified in the same category as the PRC, Thailand and Indonesia.
Desuden var hverken arbejdskraftomkostninger for de eksporterende producenter i stikprøven i Kina eller Vietnam af en sådan karakter, sammenlignet med forholdene hos producenterne i stikprøven for Brasilien, at dette ville have begrundet en justering.
Moreover, neither labour costs concerning the sampled exporting producers in the PRC nor in Vietnam were as such, compared to the conditions of the sampled producers in Brazil, that this could have warranted an adjustment.
Der bemærkes desuden, at nominelle forskelle i omkostninger mellem referencelandet og det pågældende eksportland ikke som sådan er relevante.
It is also noted that nominal differences in costs between the analogue country and the exporting country concerned are not as such relevant.
Eftersom omkostninger og priser generelt ikke anses for et holdbart grundlag for fastsættelsen af den normale værdi for lande, der hører under grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, er en sådan sammenligning i virkeligheden ødelæggende for formålet med at anvende metoderne i grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 7, litra a).
Indeed, as costs and prices are in general not considered as a viable basis for determining normal value in countries falling under Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, such comparison in fact defeats the purpose of resorting to the methods set out in Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Nogle parter fremførte, at Brasilien ikke er et egnet referenceland på grund af de påståede subsidier til fodtøjsproducenter i de nordlige territorier.
Some parties argued that Brazil is not an appropriate analogue country due to the alleged subsidies given to the footwear producers in the northern territories.
Ifølge disse parter er formålet med disse subsidier at tiltrække fodtøjsproduktion til den nordlige del af Brasilien, hvorved man påvirker markedets konkurrenceevne.
According to these parties, these subsidies aimed at attracting footwear production to the northern part of Brazil thus affecting the competitiveness of the market.
For det først skal det bemærkes, at denne påstand ikke blev underbygget med nogen form for dokumentation.
First, it should be noted that this allegation was not supported by any evidence.
Desuden var de virksomheder, der blev anvendt til fastsættelse af den normale værdi, ikke beliggende i de nordlige territorier, men i de sydlige, og kunne således ikke være berørt af de påståede subsidier.
In addition, the companies used for the determination of the normal value were not located in the Northern territories but in the South and could therefore not be affected by these alleged subsidies.
Skulle disse statstilskud findes som beskrevet af eksportørerne, ville en sådan mekanisme blot forhindre andre virksomheder i at etablere fabrikker i samme område, men ikke i at sælge deres produkter på visse dele af det brasilianske marked.
Finally, should these State interventions exist as described by the exporters, that mechanism would only prevent other companies from setting up a factory in the same area but not to sell their product in certain parts of the Brazilian market.
Skomarkedet er bestemt hverken et lokalt eller regionalt marked, men snarere et nationalt og sågar internationalt marked.
The shoe market is certainly neither a local nor a regional market but rather a national and even worldwide market.
Det forhold, at en virksomhed måtte modtage støtte til at etablere en fabrik i et fjerntliggende område, hæmmer således ikke konkurrencen, navnlig ikke på et marked med 7000 producenter.
Therefore, the fact that a company may receive subsidies to set up a factory in a remote area does not prevent competition especially on a market of 7000 producers.
Selv om omkostningerne efterhånden kan blive påvirket af den påståede statsstøtte, burde det efter al sandsynlighed blot have en trykkende virkning på salgspriserne, hvilket vil føre til en lavere normal værdi og dermed lavere dumpingmargener.
Even though costs might eventually be affected by the alleged state subsidies, these should in all likelihood only have a downward effect on sales prices which would tend to reduce normal value and thus any dumping margins.
I lyset af begrundelserne i betragtning 109 i den midlertidige forordning og navnlig det forhold, at der findes mere end 7000 producenter i Brasilien, blev konkurrencesituationen på det brasilianske marked ikke vurderet som så uhensigtsmæssig, at Brasilien skulle afvises som referenceland.
In addition, in view of the reasons provided for in recital 109 of the provisional Regulation and particularly the fact that there are more than 7000 producers in Brazil, the competition on the Brazilian market was not deemed inappropriate to reject Brazil as an analogue country.
På grundlag af ovenstående, og eftersom påstanden ikke blev begrundet yderligere, blev påstanden afvist.
On the basis of the above and since the claim was not further substantiated, the claim was therefore rejected.
Man konkluderede derfor, at Brasilien var et egnet referenceland med henblik på fastsættelsen af den normale værdi som allerede konkluderet i betragtning 124 i den midlertidige forordning.
It was therefore concluded that Brazil was an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing the normal value as already concluded in recital 124 of the provisional Regulation.
I mangel af bemærkninger fra de interesserede parter bekræftes metoden, der beskrives i betragtning 128-130 i den midlertidige forordning, hermed.
In the absence of any comments by interested parties the methodology set out in recitals 128 to 130 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Nogle parter fremførte, at resultaterne ikke burde have været baseret på eksportpriser hos de stikprøveudvalgte virksomheder ved beregning af den landsdækkende dumpingmargen.
Some parties argued that the findings should not have been based on export prices of companies in the samples when calculating the country-wide dumping margin.
Resultaterne burde snarere have været baseret på den landsdækkende eksportmængde (f.eks. oplysninger fra Eurostat).
Findings should have rather been based on the country wide export volume (e.g. Eurostat data).
Der erindres om, at bestemmelserne vedrørende stikprøveudtagning i grundforordningens artikel 17 blev anvendt til denne procedure.
It is recalled that the sampling provisions stipulated under Article 17 of the basic Regulation were applied in this particular proceeding.
Derfor anvendtes kun eksportpriser fra virksomheder i stikprøven.
Therefore only export prices of the sampled companies were used.
For stikprøveudvalgte virksomheder, der ikke opfyldte kriterierne for markedsøkonomisk behandling/individuel behandling, beregnedes en vejet gennemsnitlig dumpingmargen.
For sampled companies that did not meet the MET/IT criteria one weighted average dumping margin was calculated.
Som forklaret i betragtning 135 i den midlertidige forordning finder denne vejede gennemsnitlige dumpingmargen desuden anvendelse på samarbejdsvillige virksomheder uden for stikprøven i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 6.
Furthermore, as explained under recital 135 of the provisional Regulation, this weighted average dumping margin applies to cooperating non-sampled companies in accordance with Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Eftersom der var tale om en høj grad af samarbejde blev den samme dumpingmargen ligeledes anvendt på alle andre eksporterende producenter i Kina.
In addition, as cooperation was high the same dumping margin was applied to all other Chinese exporting producers as well.
Nogle parter hævdede, at ikke alle de relevante oplysninger til brug ved sammenligning af eksportpriserne var kommet frem.
Some parties claimed that not all details relevant to conduct the comparison of export prices had been disclosed.
Navnlig var justeringerne af de normale værdier, som skete på grundlag af brasilianske oplysninger, ifølge disse parter ikke blevet kvantificeret.
In particular, the adjustments made to the normal values determined on the basis of Brazilian data had not been quantified according to these parties.
Efter en nøje gennemgang af alle bemærkninger fra de interesserede parter og en grundig gennemgang af dokumentationen besluttede man, at det var hensigtsmæssigt at foretage en korrektion af justeringerne af udgifterne til læder som omtalt i betragtning 132 i den midlertidige forordning.
Having duly considered all comments received by interested parties and duly revised the files, it was found appropriate to make a correction to the adjustments made on leather costs, as addressed in recital 132 of the provisional Regulation.
Man fandt, at producenterne i eksportlandene, navnlig i Kina, solgte læderfodtøj af højere kvalitet, end de brasilianske producenter gjorde på deres hjemmemarked.
It was found that the producers in the exporting countries, particularly those in China, were selling leather footwear of higher quality than Brazilian producers did on their domestic market.
Forskellen på skoenes kvalitet skyldtes hovedsagelig en bedre kvalitet af det anvendte læder.
The difference in the quality of shoes was essentially due to a higher quality of the leather used.
Kvalitetsforskellen afspejlede sig også i købsprisen for det anvendte læder: Læderet i fodtøj eksporteret fra Kina og Vietnam var dyrere end det, der anvendes i Brasilien til fremstilling af sko til hjemmemarkedet.
The quality difference was also mirrored in the purchase price of the leather used: the leather of the footwear exported from China and Vietnam was more expensive than that used in Brazil to manufacture domestically-sold shoes.
Med henblik på dette blev værdien af det indkøbte læder hos referencelandets producenter sammenlignet med den tilsvarende værdi af det indkøbte læder hos de kinesiske og vietnamesiske producenter i stikprøven.
For this purpose, the value of leather inputs of analogue country producers were compared to the corresponding values of leather inputs used by Chinese and Vietnamese producers that were part of the sample.
Man fandt frem til, at det meste af læderet, som anvendes af kinesiske og vietnamesiske producenter, var importeret fra lande med markedsøkonomi.
It was found that most of the leather used by Chinese and Vietnamese producers had been imported from market economy countries.
Derfor blev der anvendt et gennemsnit omfattende verdensmarkedspriserne til at foretage justeringen.
Therefore, an average including world market prices was used to determine the adjustment.
Den relevante beregning blev foretaget separat for de to eksportlande.
The relevant calculation was made separately for the two exporting countries.
Værdiforskellen for det indkøbte læder blev ganget med læderets andel af de samlede produktionsomkostninger.
The value difference of leather inputs was multiplied by the share of leather in the total cost of production.
De efterfølgende justeringer af den normale værdi i opadgående retning udgjorde 21,6 % (Kina) og 16,4 % (Vietnam).
The subsequent adjustments upwards to the normal value amounted to 21,6 % (PRC) and 16,4 % (Vietnam).
Nogle parter fremførte, at det ikke var rimeligt at foretage justeringer for læderkvaliteten, når man konstaterede, at produktionsomkostningerne i eksportlandene blev forvredet, fordi alle eksportører i disse lande på nær én ikke var blevet indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling.
Some parties argued that it was not appropriate to make adjustments on the leather quality where it was found that the cost of production in the export countries was distorted due to the fact that all but one of the exporters in those countries had not been granted MET.
Det er korrekt, at markedsøkonomisk behandling også blev afvist, fordi man fandt, at staten udøvede indflydelse på omkostninger/priser.
It is true that MET was rejected also because state influence was found that impacted on costs/prices.
Men som bemærket ovenfor konstaterede man, at læderet var importeret fra lande med markedsøkonomi.
However, as noted above, it was found that leather had been imported from market economy countries.
Nogle parter anførte, at Kommissionen ikke fremlagde de præcise tal, som dannede grundlag for beregningen af justeringen, og som var årsagen til, at læderjusteringen måtte revideres efter den midlertidige fastsættelse.
Some parties argued that the Commission did not disclose the exact figures on which basis the adjustment was calculated and why the leather adjustment had to be revised after the provisional determination.
Men revisionen af læderjusteringen forklares ovenfor.
However, the revision on the leather adjustment is explained above.
Desuden fremlagde Kommissionen alle nødvendige oplysninger, som dannede grundlag for de væsentlige fakta og overvejelser, for alle virksomheder, som er berørt af denne procedure. Disse oplysninger udgjorde grundlaget for den planlagte gennemførelse af endelige foranstaltninger.
Furthermore, the Commission disclosed to all companies concerned by this proceeding the necessary details underlying the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it is intended to recommend the imposition of definitive measures.
Nogle interesserede parter hævdede, at der ikke skulle have været anvendt nogen justering for forskning og udvikling (FoU) på den normale værdi, eftersom de kinesiske og vietnamesiske producenter brugte tilsvarende beløb på FoU.
Some interested parties claimed that no research and development (‘R&D’) adjustment should have been applied on the normal value, because similar amounts of R&D were incurred by the Chinese and Vietnamese producers.
Man konstaterede imidlertid, at FoU-omkostningerne hos producenterne i stikprøven fra de berørte lande kun vedrørte produktions-FoU, mens den brasilianske FoU omfattede design og prøver på nye skomodeller, dvs. at denne form for FoU er anderledes, og derfor anses det for nødvendigt at fastholde denne justering.
However, it was found that R&D costs incurred by the sampled producers from the countries concerned related only to production R&D, whereas the Brazilian R&D covered design and samples of new footwear models, i.e. such type of R&D is different and therefore it is considered necessary to keep this adjustment.
En anden part hævdede ligeledes, at der burde foretages en justering for at tage hensyn til, at overskuddet på salg til producenter af originalt udstyr (OEM) genererer et mindre overskud end andre former for salg.
One other party also claimed that an adjustment should be made to take into account that the profit made with sales to original equipment manufacturers (‘OEM’) generates less profit than other sales.
Men denne påstand blev ikke understøttet af resultaterne af undersøgelserne af de brasilianske virksomheder, hvor der ikke var tale om sådanne forskelle.
However, this allegation was not supported by the findings of the investigation in the Brazilian companies where such difference did not exist.
Desuden tages der allerede højde for forskellen mellem salg til OEM og salg under egne mærker i den foretagne justering med henblik på at tage højde for forskelle i FoU-omkostninger.
Moreover, any difference between sales to OEM and own brand sales, is already taken into account in the adjustment made to allow for the R&D cost difference.
Det bemærkes endvidere, at det var nødvendigt med en justering vedrørende børnesko.
It is further noted that an adjustment with regard to children's shoes was necessary.
Ingen af de brasilianske producenter fremstillede børnesko.
None of the Brazilian producers manufactured children's shoes.
Ud fra f.eks. Eurostats importdata ses det, at børnesko generelt er billigere end voksensko.
It can be observed, e.g. by Eurostat import data, that children's shoes are in general cheaper than adults' shoes.
Dette kan tilskrives børneskoenes mindre størrelse, hvilket betyder, at der medgår mindre materialemængder ved fremstillingen.
This can be ascribed to the smaller size of children's shoes and consequently smaller quantity of raw material required for their production.
Dermed blev der foretaget en justering på grundlag af de forholdsmæssige prisforskelle mellem børnesko og voksensko, der sælges af Fællesskabets erhvervsgren.
Consequently, an adjustment was applied on the basis of the proportional price differences between children's and adult's shoes sold by the Community industry.
Justeringen udgør 33,2 % af den normale værdi.
The adjustment amounts to 33,2 % on the normal value.
Nogle parter hævdede, at denne justering ikke var blevet forklaret tilstrækkeligt.
Some parties claimed that this adjustment has not been adequately explained.
Det blev desuden anført, at den eneste faktor, der kan begrunde prisforskellen, er forskellen i størrelse og dermed mængden af anvendte råmaterialer.
Furthermore, it was stated that the only factor justifying the price difference is the difference in sizes and subsequently the amount of raw materials used.
De pågældende parter mente, at en sådan antagelse var fejlagtig.
Such an assumption was erroneous according to those parties.
I den henseende skal det bemærkes, at justeringen med hensyn til børnesko blev forelagt parterne i sin helhed og beskrives ovenfor.
In this respect it is noted that the adjustment made with regard to children's shoes was fully disclosed to the parties and is set out above.
Desuden fremlagde de parter, der anså denne justering for fejlagtig, ikke nogen bedre alternativ metode, der kunne anvendes til at sikre sammenligningen af eksportpriser og normale værdier på et retfærdigt grundlag.
Furthermore, parties that regarded this adjustment erroneous failed to provide any better alternative method that could be used and ensure comparison of export prices and normal values on a fair basis.
I mangel af yderligere bemærkninger bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 131-133 i den midlertidige forordning hermed.
In the absence of further comments the findings in recitals 131 to 133 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Nogle parter anførte, at ordningen med produktkontrolnumre ikke gav mulighed for en retfærdig sammenligning.
Some parties argued that the PCN scheme did not allow for a fair comparison.
Parterne hævdede navnlig, at den anvendte ordning med produktkontrolnumre var for bred og ikke var baseret på produktspecifikke, fysiske karakteristika.
In particular, parties claimed that the PCN scheme used was too broad and not based on product-specific physical characteristics.
Ifølge disse parter udgjorde dette angiveligt en overtrædelse af artikel 2, stk. 4, i antidumpingaftalen.
According to those parties this allegedly constituted a violation of Article 2(4) of the ADA.
Man hævdede desuden, at generelle justeringer (for læderkvaliteten) ikke i tilstrækkelig grad kompenserede for denne påståede mangel.
It was further argued that general adjustments (on the leather quality) did not provide sufficient compensation for this alleged flaw.
I artikel 2, stk. 4, i antidumpingaftalen og i grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, stilles der ganske rigtig krav om en retfærdig sammenligning.
Indeed Article 2(4) of the ADA, as well as Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, mandates a fair comparison.
Men disse bestemmelser indeholder ingen nærmere oplysninger vedrørende udformningen af produktkontrolnumre.
However, these provisions do not provide any details with regard to the design of PCNs.
Der erindres om, at EF længe har anvendt en praksis med at lette sammenligneligheden mellem den pågældende vare og den samme vare ved at benytte produktkontrolnumre, hvorved varen opdeles i typer/modeller i henhold til bestemte træk eller tekniske specifikationer.
It is recalled that it is the long-standing practice of the EC to facilitate the comparability between the product concerned and the like product by using PCNs which subdivide the product into types/models according to certain features or technical specifications.
I dette tilfælde har man taget hensyn til fem sådanne elementer, nemlig fodtøjets stil, forbrugertypen, typen af fodtøj, ydersålens materiale og for.
In the present case five such elements have been taken into consideration, i.e. style of footwear, type of consumer, type of footwear, material of the outer sole and lining.
Disse elementer afspejler i tilstrækkelig grad de væsentlige karakteristika ved den pågældende vare.
These elements sufficiently reflect the essential characteristics of the product concerned.
Det bemærkes endvidere, at der hverken i grundforordningen eller i antidumpingaftalen findes noget juridisk krav om at anvende produktkontrolnumre ved antidumpingundersøgelser.
Furthermore, it is noted that no legal obligation is set neither by the basic Regulation nor by the ADA to make use of any PCNs in anti-dumping investigations.
I nærværende tilfælde har man i henhold til princippet om retfærdig sammenligning konsekvent anvendt den samme ordning med produktkontrolnumre til at klassificere modeller af den pågældende vare, der fremstilles og sælges af producenter i Fællesskabet, eksportlandene og referencelandet, med henblik på at kunne sammenligne priserne i Fællesskabet, eksportpriser og normale værdier på en retfærdig måde.
In the present case, in line with the principle of a fair comparison, one and the same PCN scheme has been consistently used to classify models of the product concerned manufactured and sold by producers in the Community, the export countries and the analogue country, for the sake of comparing Community prices, export prices and normal values on a fair basis.
Man fandt desuden, at spørgsmålet om læderkvalitet, som ikke var omfattet af ordningen med produktkontrolnumre, påvirkede priserne og prissammenligneligheden for den pågældende vare.
Furthermore, it was found that indeed the leather quality issue, which was not covered by the PCN scheme affected the prices and price comparability of the product concerned.
Læder udgør normalt 50 % eller mere af den samlede produktionsomkostning ved en lædersko.
Leather usually makes up for 50 % or more of a leather shoe's total cost of production.
Afhængig af typen, kvaliteten og mængden af det anvendte læder kan udgifterne til læder variere betydeligt, men omkostningsforskellene kan tilsvarende aflæses i salgspriserne.
Depending on the type, quality and quantity of leather used, the leather cost may vary to a significant degree but the cost differences were found to be reflected accordingly in sales prices.