natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Da den eneste kendte eksporterende producent i Rusland har indvilget i at samarbejde i denne undersøgelse, er det sandsynlige scenario i tilfælde af, at foranstaltningerne får lov at udløbe, baseret på oplysninger leveret i forbindelse med den eksporterende producents kontrollerede besvarelse af spørgeskemaet.
As the only known exporting producer in Russia has cooperated in this investigation, the likely scenario of what would happen if measures were allowed to lapse has been mainly based on information supplied by the exporting producer's verified reply to the questionnaire.
Forholdet mellem priser i Fællesskabet og i Rusland
Relationship between prices in the Community and prices within Russia
Først bør det nævnes, at det fremherskende prisniveau i Fællesskabet allerede i betydeligt omfang er under indflydelse af importen fra Rusland i medfør af Ruslands gældende kvantitative tilsagn, idet den russiske eksportør allerede dækker 10 % af Fællesskabets forbrug.
It should first be mentioned that the prevailing price level within the Community is already subject to a significant influence from imports from Russia given the QT in place, as the Russian exporter is already satisfying around 10 % of Community consumption.
Ved en sammenligning mellem det fremherskende prisniveau på det russiske hjemmemarked med det fremherskende prisniveau i Fællesskabet er prisniveauet i Rusland generelt lavere.
When comparing the prevailing price level on the domestic market in Russia with the prevailing price level in the Community, the price level in Russia is generally lower.
I betragtning af at den russiske producent har kunnet eksportere faste mængder i henhold til Ruslands kvantitative tilsagn uden pålæg af antidumpingtold, har han imidlertid haft et incitament til at eksportere krystallinsk siliciumcarbid (som giver højere priser pr. ton) til Fællesskabet, og beholde metallurgisk siliciumcarbid til hjemmemarkedet og andre markeder.
However, given that the quantities that the Russian producer has been able to export free from antidumping duties under the QT were pre-set, the Russian producer has had an incentive to export the crystalline grades (triggering higher prices per tonne) to the Community, leaving metallurgical grades for its domestic market and for other destinations).
Derfor vil den eventuelle reelle prisforskel mellem samme grader være mindre end den, der fremgår af en sammenligning mellem de gennemsnitlige prisniveauer.
Therefore the real price differential between the same grades, if any, would be smaller than what a comparison between average price levels suggests.
Det kan konkluderes, at det generelt højere prisniveau i Fællesskabet under normale omstændigheder ville have udløst en forøgelse af eksporten til Fællesskabet, hvis foranstaltningerne fik lov at udløbe, men at dette scenario ikke er sandsynligt i det foreliggende tilfælde.
To conclude, while the generally higher price level in the Community would normally trigger an increase in exports to the Community should measures be allowed to lapse, this scenario does not appear to be likely in the present case.
På grund af Ruslands kvantitative tilsagn bør den mulige forøgelse af importen af især siliciumcarbid af høj kvalitetsgrad ikke overvurderes, da den russiske eksportør allerede har haft mulighed for at eksportere betragtelige mængder af siliciumcarbid og har haft et incitament til at eksportere siliciumcarbid af høj kvalitetsgrad.
Indeed, given the existence of the QT, the potential increase of imports of especially high-grade SiC should not be overestimated as the Russian exporter already has had the opportunity to export significant quantities of SiC and has had the incentive to export high-grade SiC.
Derfor er sandsynligheden for en forøgelse af importen af siliciumcarbid sandsynligvis begrænset såvel med hensyn til kvantitet som kvalitet (metallurgiske grader), og den ville under alle omstændigheder ikke finde sted til dumpede priser.
Thus, an increase of imports of SiC is likely to be limited both in quantities and in types of SiC (metallurgical grades) and would in any event in all likelihood not be at dumped prices.
Forholdet mellem priserne ved eksport til tredjelande og priserne i Rusland
Relationship between export prices to third countries and prices within Russia
Mere end 75 % af russiske producenters eksport til tredjelande går til USA.
More than 75 % of the exports to third countries by the Russian producers are destined for the United States of America.
Ved sammenligning af hjemmemarkedspriserne og priserne ved eksport til USA kan det konstateres, at prisniveauet for eksporten til USA generelt er højere.
When comparing the domestic prices and the export prices to the United States of America, the price levels of the exports to the United States of America are, on average, higher.
Det bør imidlertid noteres, at mikset af grader for henholdsvis de varer, der er solgt på eksportmarkeder og for dem, der er solgt på hjemmemarkedet, sandsynligvis er forskellige (det er sandsynligt, at eksportvarerne indeholder grader af højere værdi i betragtning af de involverede transportomkostninger), hvilket gør det svært at drage konklusioner af en sådan sammenligning.
It should be recognised, however, that the mix of grades of the products sold for export and those sold on the domestic market are probably different (likelihood of exports containing higher value-per-tonne grades to cover the transport costs involved), which makes it difficult to draw conclusions from such a comparison.
Ikke desto mindre bør det bemærkes, at denne eksport ikke pålægges antidumpingforanstaltninger, og at der ikke er indikationer for, at en sådan eksport ville blive dumpet.
Nevertheless, it is noted that these exports are not subject to antidumping measures and that there are no indications that such exports would be dumped.
Forholdet mellem priserne ved eksport til tredjelande og prisniveauet i Fællesskabet
Relationship between export price to third countries and the price level in the Community
Ved sammenligning af den russiske eksportørs priser ved eksport til eksportørens vigtigste tredjelandsmarked, USA, med eksportørens priser ved eksport til Fællesskabet er det vigtigt at tage Ruslands kvantitative tilsagn i betragtning.
When comparing the Russian exporter's export prices to its main third country market, the United States of America, with the Russian exporter's export prices to the Community market, it is important to recall the QT in place.
Som beskrevet ovenfor har den russiske eksportør i kraft af de forudbestemte mængder, han har kunnet eksportere til Fællesskabet, haft et incitament til at eksportere kvalitetsgrader af høj værdi pr. ton til Fællesskabet.
As explained above, given the pre-set quantities that the Russian exporter has been able to export to the EC, it has had an incentive to export high value-per-tonne grades to the Community market.
Som beskrevet i betragtning 62 kan det på samme måde antages, at eksporten til USA på grund af de høje transportomkostninger hovedsagelig består af grader af høj værdi pr. ton.
Similarly and as explained in recital 62, it can be assumed that also the exports to the United States of America, given the transport costs involved, contain mainly high value-per-tonne grades.
Dette bevirker, at den gennemsnitlige salgspris i Fællesskabet og i USA bliver forholdsvis sammenlignelige.
Thus, this puts the average selling price to the Community market and to the United States market on a reasonably comparable basis.
Ved en sammenligning mellem den gennemsnitlige salgspris på fællesskabsmarkedet og den gennemsnitlige salgspris på markedet i USA, konstateredes det, at priserne i USA gennemsnitligt var højere.
Having compared the average selling price to the Community market with the average selling price to the market of the United States of America, the prices to the United States market have been found to be, on average, higher.
Det kan konkluderes, at der tilsyneladende ikke foreligger noget incitament for den russiske producent til at omdirigere de mængder, der for tiden sælges på producentens vigtigste eksportmarked, USA, til fællesskabsmarkedet, hvis foranstaltningerne ophæves.
To conclude, there seems to be no apparent incentive for the Russian producer to divert its quantities presently sold on its main export market, the United States, to the Community market, should measures be repealed.
Den russiske eksporterende producent har en kapacitet, der er begrænset til 62000 ton.
The capacity of the exporting producer in Russia is limited to 62000 tonnes.
I undersøgelsesperioden konstateredes det, at producenten opererede for næsten fuld kapacitet efter at have øget sin kapacitetsudnyttelse i løbet af denne periode.
During the IP, it was found to work close to full capacity, having increased its utilisation rate during the reference period.
Lagersituationen var normal for erhvervet.
The stocks were found to be normal for this kind of business.
I betragtning af den teknologi, den russiske producent anvender (forarbejdning i »togvogne«, der rangeres mellem elektriske installationer og losning/sortering), er det ikke sandsynligt, at den eksporterende producent vil kunne udvide i nær fremtid.
Given the technology used by the Russian producer (a technology using train cars as places of processing, which are marshalled between electricity installations and places for unloading/sorting), it is unlikely that the exporting producer would be able to expand in the near future.
Det kan konkluderes, at der ikke er indikationer for, at den russiske producent vil kunne udvide sin produktion med henblik på øget eksport til Fællesskabet, hvis foranstaltningerne får lov at udløbe.
To conclude, should measures be allowed to lapse, there are no indications that the Russian producer would be able to increase its production in order to increase its exports to the Community.
Da den eneste kendte eksporterende producent i Ukraine har indvilget i at samarbejde i denne undersøgelse, er det sandsynlige scenario i tilfælde af, at foranstaltningerne får lov at udløbe, baseret på oplysninger leveret i forbindelse med den eksporterende producents kontrollerede besvarelse af spørgeskemaet.
As the only known exporting producer in the Ukraine has cooperated in this investigation, the likely scenario of what would happen if measures were allowed to lapse has been mainly based on information supplied by the exporting producer's verified reply to the questionnaire.
Den ukrainske eksporterende producent har en kapacitet, der er begrænset til 23000 ton.
The capacity of the exporting producer in Ukraine is limited to 23000 tonnes.
I betragtning af den teknologi, den ukrainske producent anvender (identisk med den teknologi, der anvendes af den russiske producent, og beskrevet i betragtning 68), er det ikke sandsynligt, at den eksporterende producent vil kunne udvide i nær fremtid.
Given the technology used by the Ukrainian producer (same as the Russian producer which is explained in recital 68), it is unlikely that that the exporting producer would be able to expand in the near future.
CEFIC hævdede, at den eksporterende producents kapacitet var så høj som 32000 ton.
CEFIC claimed that the capacity of the exporting producer would be as high as 32000 tonnes.
Denne påstand var imidlertid baseret på hypotetiske oplysninger, hvori der ikke var taget hensyn til perioder med driftstop med henblik på vedligeholdelse og reparation, eller de særlige forhold, der gælder for en fremstillingsvirksomhed som denne, der er lokaliseret i et byområde og dermed underlagt miljøkrav.
However, this argument was based on hypothetical information without taking into considerations standstill periods for maintenance and repair, nor taking into account the specificities of the producing company concerned which is located in an urban area and submitted to environmental constraints.
Af disse grunde bekræftedes kapaciteten som fastsat i betragtning 71, og CEFIC's påstand måtte afvises.
On these grounds, the capacity as established in recital 71 was confirmed and the claim by CEFIC had to be rejected.
Det kan konkluderes, at der ikke er indikationer for, at den ukrainske producent vil kunne udvide sin produktion med henblik på øget eksport til Fællesskabet, hvis foranstaltningerne får lov at udløbe.
To conclude, should measures be allowed to lapse, there are no indications that the Ukrainian producer would be able to increase its production in order to increase its exports to the Community.
Forholdet mellem priser i Fællesskabet, i Ukraine og i tredjelande
Relationship between prices in the Community and prices within the Ukraine and third countries
Ved sammenligning mellem det fremherskende prisniveau på det ukrainske hjemmemarked med det fremherskende prisniveau i Fællesskabet og i tredjelandene er prisniveauet i Ukraine og i tredjelandene gennemsnitligt lavere.
When comparing the prevailing price level on the domestic market in the Ukraine with the prevailing price level in the Community, and prices to third countries, the price level in the Ukraine and to third countries are, on average, lower.
Det var imidlertid ikke muligt at foretage en anvendelig sammenligning mellem det ukrainske marked, tredjelandsmarkeder og fællesskabsmarkedet, da produktmiksene på disse markeder er yderst forskellige, og gennemsnitspriserne derfor ikke er sammenlignelige.
However, a meaningful comparison between the Ukrainian market, third country markets and the Community market was not possible because the product mix is very different and average prices are therefore not comparable.
Desuden er det ukrainske hjemmemarked af begrænset størrelse, og den ukrainske producent er ikke som Fællesskabets producenter i stand til at producere alle (de højere) grader.
Moreover, the domestic market in the Ukraine is limited in size and the Ukrainian producer is not able to produce all the various (high-value) grades as the Community producers.
Det kunne derfor ikke fastslås, om den ukrainske eksportør ville have et incitament til at omdirigere mængder fra sit hjemmemarked eller sine eksportmarkeder til fællesskabsmarkedet, hvis foranstaltningerne fik lov at udløbe.
It could therefore not be established whether, should measures be allowed to lapse, the Ukrainian exporter would have an incentive to divert volumes from its domestic market or from its export markets to the Community market.
I betragtning af undersøgelsesresultaterne vedrørende dumping og i lyset af det generelt højere prisniveau i Fællesskabet konkluderes det, at der, selv hvis eksporten til fællesskabsmarkedet skulle stige, ville være stor sandsynlighed for, at denne eksport ikke ville finde sted til dumpingpriser.
However, in view of the findings on dumping, and in the light of the overall higher price level prevailing in the Community, it is concluded that, even if exports to the Community market increased, these exports would in all likelihood not be made at dumped prices.
Denne stigning ville under alle omstændigheder være begrænset (den anslås til mindre end 10000 ton) i betragtning af den ukrainske eksportørs begrænsede kapacitet.
Moreover, the increase would in any event be limited (estimated at less than 10000 tonnes), given the limited capacity of the Ukrainian exporter.
Konklusioner om sandsynligheden for fortsat eller fornyet dumping
Conclusions on likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping
Det bør nævnes, at ingen eksporterende producenter i Kina har samarbejdet i forbindelse med undersøgelsen.
It is recalled that no exporting producers in the PRC have cooperated in the investigation.
På grundlag af de foreliggende oplysninger konkluderedes det, at kinesiske eksportører stadig foretager dumping, og at de sandsynligvis ville fortsætte denne dumping på fællesskabsmarkedet, hvis foranstaltningerne fik lov at udløbe.
On the basis of facts available, it was found that Chinese exporters are still dumping and would be likely to continue their dumping practices towards the Community market should measures be allowed to lapse.
Det konkluderedes derfor, at der er sandsynlighed for fortsat dumping fra de kinesiske eksporterende producenters side, hvis foranstaltningerne får lov at udløbe.
Therefore, it was found that there is a likelihood of continuation of dumping by exporting producers in the PRC should measures be allowed to lapse.
Det skal nævnes, at den ukrainske eksportør ifølge undersøgelsen ikke har dumpet sine priser i undersøgelsesperioden, og at der ikke er indikationer for, at denne situation ville ændre sig, hvis foranstaltningerne fik lov at udløbe.
It is recalled that the Ukrainian exporter has been found not to export at dumped prices during the investigation period and there are no indications that such situation would change if measures were allowed to lapse.
Desuden fandtes det, at selv om eksporten fra Ukraine skulle stige, såfremt foranstaltningerne blev ophævet, vil denne stigning formodes at være begrænset.
Furthermore, it was found that, although exports from the Ukraine to the Community may increase, should measures be repealed, such increase is expected to be limited.
I betragtning af den ukrainske producents begrænsede kapacitet formodes en sådan stigning af eksporten til Fællesskabet at være på mindre end 10000 ton, og den ville under alle omstændigheder næppe finde sted til dumpingpriser.
Indeed, given the limited capacity that the Ukrainian producer holds, this increase of exports to the Community is assumed to be less than 10000 tonnes and would in all likelihood not be made at dumped prices.
Det konkluderes derfor, at der ikke er sandsynlighed for fornyet dumping af importen med oprindelse i Ukraine.
Therefore, it is considered that there is no likelihood of recurrence of dumping of imports originating in the Ukraine.
Rusland
Russian federation
Det skal nævnes, at den russiske eksportør ifølge undersøgelsen ikke har dumpet sine eksportpriser i undersøgelsesperioden, og at der ikke er indikationer for, at denne situation ville ændre sig, hvis foranstaltningerne fik lov at udløbe.
It is recalled that during the investigation period, the Russian producer has been found not to export at dumped prices and there are no indications that such situation would change if measures were allowed to lapse.
Desuden skal det nævnes, at den russiske eksporterende producent i kraft af Ruslands kvantitative tilsagn i mange år har kunnet levere en fast mængde siliciumcarbid til fællesskabsmarkedet.
Furthermore, it is recalled that the Russian exporting producer has been able to supply the Community market with a fixed quantity of SiC through a QT for many years.
De mængder, der er eksporteret i dette regi, har i undersøgelsesperioden udgjort ca. 17 % af den russiske producents samlede kapacitet.
The quantities exported through this channel have amounted to, during the IP, around 17 % of the Russian producer's total capacity.
Den russiske eksporterende producent er i forvejen veletableret på markedet, og en pludselig stigning i importen fra Rusland vil derfor være højst usandsynlig.
Thus, the Russian exporting producer is already well established on the market, i.e. a sudden increase of imports originating in Russia is therefore highly unlikely.
Da de priser, den russiske eksporterende producent har anvendt ved salg til tredjelande, er konstateret højere end dem, der er anvendt ved salg på fællesskabsmarkedet i henhold til det kvantitative tilsagn, er risikoen for omdirigering af handelen med større mængder til fællesskabsmarkedet tilsyneladende relativt lille.
Moreover, since the prices at which the Russian exporting producer has sold to third countries were found to be higher than those at which quantities were sold to the Community, the risk for trade diversion of significant quantities to the Community market appears to be relatively small.
Endelig konkluderedes det, at den russiske eksporterende producent opererede tæt på sin fulde kapacitet og kun i begrænset omfang kan øge denne.
Finally, it was found that the Russian exporting producer was working close to full capacity and has a limited ability to increase its capacity.
Det konkluderes derfor, at der ikke er sandsynlighed for fornyet dumping af importen med oprindelse i Rusland.
For these reasons, it is considered that there is no risk of recurrence of dumping of imports originating in the Russian Federation.
På baggrund af disse resultater vedrørende Ukraine og Rusland bør proceduren vedrørende disse lande afsluttes.
Given the findings for Ukraine and Russia, the proceeding should be terminated against these countries.
EF-erhvervsgrenens struktur har ændret sig siden den seneste udløbsundersøgelse, idet den tidligere tyske producent, Elektroschmelzwerk Kempten GmbH, München, er blevet opdelt i to forretningsmæssigt forbundne selskaber, hvoraf det ene befinder sig i Nederlandene, det andet i Tyskland.
The structure of the Community industry changed since the last expiry review, i.e. the former German producer Elektroschmelzwerk Kempten GmbH, München, split in two related companies, one located in the Netherlands and the other in Germany.
Kun førstnævnte selskab producerer og forarbejder rå siliciumcarbid, mens sidstnævnte forarbejder siliciumcarbid fremstillet af Kollo Silicon carbide BV. Den færdige vare er imidlertid stadig samme vare.
Only the former is producing and processing the crude SiC, the latter one further processes SiC produced by Kollo Silicon carbide BV but the final product remains the like product.
Desuden sælger ESK-SIC GmbH foruden sin egen siliciumcarbid også siliciumcarbid produceret af Kollo Silicon carbide BV. De to selskaber betragtes derfor som én og samme selskabsgruppe.
Moreover, ESK-SIC GmbH sells its own SiC but also SiC produced by Kollo Silicon carbide BV Therefore both companies are considered as forming one group.
Producenter i Fællesskabet
Community production
I Fællesskabet fremstilles samme vare af to producenter, der tegner sig for den samlede produktion i Fællesskabet, jf. grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 1.
Within the Community, the like product is manufactured by two producers which constitute the total Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Følgende producenter i Fællesskabet støtter anmodningen:
The following European Community producers have supported the request:
Kollo Silicon carbide BV (Nederlandene) og dets forretningsmæssigt forbundne selskab ESK-SIC GmbH (Tyskland)
Kollo Silicon carbide BV (Netherlands), with its related company ESK-SIC GmbH (Germany),
Navarro SiC, SA (Spanien).
Navarro SiC, SA (Spain).
Da disse producenter i Fællesskabet tegner sig for 100 % af produktionen i Fællesskabet af samme vare, konkluderes det, at de udgør EF-erhvervsgrenen, jf. grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 1, og artikel 5, stk. 4.
As above Community producers represent 100 % of the Community production of the like product, it is concluded that the complainant producers constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Undersøgelsen af virkningerne af den pågældende import for EF-erhvervsgrenen omfattede en vurdering af økonomiske faktorer og forhold, der i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 5, kan have indvirkning på denne erhvervsgrens situation.
The examination of the impact of the imports concerned on the Community industry included an evaluation of the economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the industry as listed in Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Det åbenbare forbrug på fællesskabsmarkedet blev fastlagt på grundlag af importmængderne for den pågældende vare fra de pågældende lande og alle andre tredjelande og EF-erhvervsgrenens salgsmængder på fællesskabsmarkedet.
The apparent Community consumption was established on the basis of the volume of imports of the product concerned from the countries concerned and all other third countries and the volumes of sales in the Community market of the Community industry.
Importmængden blev fastlagt på grundlag af Eurostats oplysninger for de tilsvarende KN-koder i den betragtede periode.
The volume of imports was determined on the basis of Eurostat figures corresponding to the relevant CN code during the period considered.