natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det Europæiske Fællesskab, repræsenteret ved Kommissionen, stemmer for det udkast til UN/ECE-regulativ, der er omhandlet i artikel 1, ved afstemningen på et kommende møde i administrationsudvalget for verdensforummet for harmonisering af regulativer for motorkøretøjer under FN’s Økonomiske Kommission for Europa.
The Community, represented by the Commission, shall vote in favour of the draft UN/ECE Regulation referred to in Article 1 at a forthcoming meeting of the Administrative Committee of the UN/ECE World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations.
Regulativet fra UN/ECE om godkendelse af motorkøretøjer for så vidt angår førerens fremadrettede synsfelt integreres i systemet for EF-typegodkendelse.
The UN/ECE Regulation concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the forward field of vision of the motor vehicle driver shall become part of the Community type-approval system for motor vehicles.
UN/ECE-dokument TRANS/WP.29/2005/82.
UN/ECE Document TRANS/WP.29/2005/2082.
Senest ændret ved Kommissionens direktiv 90/630/EØF (EFT L 341 af 6.12.1990, s. 20).
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 90/630/EEC (OJ L 341, 6.12.1990, p. 20).
Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 22. februar 2007.
Done at Brussels, 22 February 2007. For the Council
Müntefering Formand
Müntefering
om Det Europæiske Fællesskabs holdning til udkast til regulativ fra De Forenede Nationers Økonomiske Kommission for Europa om godkendelse af opdelingsanordninger til beskyttelse af personerne i køretøjer mod bagageforskydning, leveret som ikke-originalt udstyr til køretøjer
on the position of the Community in relation to the draft Regulation of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the approval of partitioning systems to protect passengers against displaced luggage, supplied as non original vehicle equipment
under henvisning til Rådets afgørelse 97/836/EF af 27. november 1997 om Det Europæiske Fællesskabs tiltrædelse af overenskomsten under De Forenede Nationers (FN) Økonomiske Kommission for Europa om indførelse af ensartede tekniske forskrifter for hjulkøretøjer samt udstyr og dele, som kan monteres og/eller benyttes på hjulkøretøjer, samt vilkårene for gensidig anerkendelse af godkendelser, der er meddelt på grundlag af sådanne forskrifter [1], særlig artikel 4, stk. 2, andet led,
Having regard to Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions [1], in particular the second indent of Article 4(2) thereof,
Udkastet til regulativ fra FN’s Økonomiske Kommission for Europa (i det følgende benævnt »udkastet til UN/ECE-regulativet«) om godkendelse af opdelingsanordninger til beskyttelse af personerne i køretøjer mod bagageforskydning, leveret som ikke-originalt udstyr til køretøjer [2], tager sigte på at fjerne de tekniske hindringer for samhandelen med motorkøretøjer mellem de kontraherende parter for så vidt angår disse komponenter, samtidig med at der opnås en høj grad af sikkerhed og miljøbeskyttelse.
The draft Regulation of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (hereinafter the draft UN/ECE Regulation) concerning the approval of partitioning systems to protect passengers against displaced luggage, supplied as non-original vehicle equipment [2] provides for the abolition of technical barriers to the trade of motor vehicles between the Contracting Parties with respect to these components, while ensuring a high level of safety and environmental protection.
Fællesskabet bør fastlægge sin holdning til ovennævnte udkast til UN/ECE-regulativ og derfor gøre det muligt for Fællesskabet, repræsenteret ved Kommissionen, at stemme for udkastet.
It is appropriate to define the Community’s position in relation to the draft UN/ECE Regulation and consequently to provide for the Community, represented by the Commission, to vote in favour of that draft.
Da forslaget til regulativ omfatter levering af ikke-originalt udstyr til køretøjer, vil det ikke skulle integreres i systemet for EF-typegodkendelse af motorkøretøjer —
Since the draft UN/ECE Regulation concerns the provision of non original vehicle equipment, it should not become part of the Community system for the type-approval of motor vehicles,
Udkastet til UN/ECE-regulativet om godkendelse af opdelingsanordninger til beskyttelse af personerne i køretøjer mod bagageforskydning, leveret som ikke-originalt udstyr til køretøjer, godkendes hermed.
The draft UN/ECE Regulation on partitioning systems to protect passengers against displaced luggage, supplied as non original vehicle equipment, is hereby approved.
Fællesskabet, repræsenteret ved Kommissionen, stemmer for det udkast til UN/ECE-regulativ, der er omhandlet i artikel 1 ved afstemningen på et kommende møde i administrationsudvalget for verdensforummet for harmonisering af regulativer for motorkøretøjer under FN’s Økonomiske Kommission for Europa.
The Community, represented by the Commission, shall vote in favour of the draft UN/ECE Regulation referred to in Article 1 at a forthcoming meeting of the Administrative Committee of the UN/ECE World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations.
UN/ECE-regulativet om godkendelse af opdelingsanordninger til beskyttelse af personerne i køretøjer mod bagageforskydning, leveret som ikke-originalt udstyr til køretøjer, integreres ikke i systemet for EF-typegodkendelse af motorkøretøjer.
The UN/ECE Regulation on partitioning systems to protect passengers against displaced luggage, supplied as non original vehicle equipment, shall not become part of the Community type-approval system for motor vehicles.
(Sag nr. COMP/M.4094 — Ineos/BP Dormagen)
(Case No COMP/M.4094 — Ineos/BP Dormagen)
(meddelt under nummer K(2006) 3592)
(notified under document number C(2006) 3592)
Den 10. august 2006 vedtog Kommissionen en beslutning i en fusionssag i henhold til Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 139/2004 af 20. januar 2004 om kontrol med fusioner og virksomhedsovertagelser [1], særlig artikel 8, stk. 1, i denne forordning.
On 10 August 2006 the Commission adopted a Decision in a merger case under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings [1], and in particular Article 8(1) of that Regulation.
En ikke-fortrolig version af hele beslutningen på sagens autentiske sprog og på Kommissionens arbejdssprog findes på GD COMP’s websted på følgende adresse: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competiton/index_en.html(1) Den 24. januar 2006 meddelte INEOS Group Limited (herefter benævnt »Ineos«) Kommissionen, at Ineos gennem opkøb af aktiver havde planer om at erhverve kontrol over BP Ethylene Oxide/Ethylene Glykol Business (herefter benævnt »BP Dormagen Business«), som kontrolleres af British Petroleum Group (herefter benævnt »BP«).
A non-confidential version of the full Decision can be found in the authentic language of the case and in the working languages of the Commission on the website of the Directorate-General for Competition, at the following address: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competiton/index_en.html(1) On 24 January 2006, the Commission received a notification by which the BP Ethylene Oxide/Ethylene Glycol Business (BP Dormagen Business) controlled by British Petroleum Group (BP) by way of purchase of assets.
Ineos er et britisk aktieselskab, der har en række 100 %-ejede datterselskaber, som på verdensplan er aktive inden for produktion, distribution, salg og markedsføring af kemiske mellemprodukter og specialkemikalier.
Ineos is a United Kingdom limited company with various wholly owned subsidiaries which are active worldwide in the production, distribution, sales and marketing of intermediate and speciality chemicals.
Den 16. december 2006 overtog Ineos Innovene BP’s tidligere afdeling for olefiner, derivater og raffinering (bortset fra BP Dormagen Business, der er genstand for denne beslutning), som producerer en række petrokemikalier, bl.a. olefiner og derivater heraf samt en række raffinaderiprodukter [2].
On 16 December 2006, Ineos acquired Innovene, the former olefins, derivatives and refining business of BP (excluding the BP Dormagen Business, the acquisition of which is the subject of this decision) which manufactures a range of petrochemicals, including olefins and their derivatives and a range of refinery products [2].
Denne operation blev godkendt af Kommissionen den 9. december 2005 (sag nr. COMP/M.4005 — Ineos/Innovene, »hovedtransaktionen«).
That operation was cleared by the Commission on 9 December 2005 (Case No COMP/M.4005 — Ineos/Innovene, the main transaction).
BP Dormagen Business, som udelukkende omfatter et produktionsanlæg i Køln/Dormagen (Tyskland), kontrolleres på nuværende tidspunkt af BP og er aktiv inden for produktion af ethylenoxid (»EO«) og ethylenglycoler (»EGs eller glycoler«).
BP Dormagen Business, which consists solely of a plant located in Köln/Dormagen (Germany), is currently controlled by BP and is active in the manufacture of ethylene oxide (EO) and ethylene glycols (EGs or glycols).
På sit 143. møde den 28. juli 2006 afgav Det Rådgivende Udvalg for Kontrol med Fusioner en positiv udtalelse om et udkast til beslutning om godkendelse, der var forelagt af Kommissionen [3].
The Advisory Committee on Concentrations, at its 143rd meeting of 28 July 2006, delivered a favourable opinion on a draft Decision granting clearance submitted to it by the Commission [3].
I en rapport fra 26. juli 2006 konstaterede høringskonsulenten, at parternes ret til at blive hørt var overholdt [3] EUT C 54 af 9.3.2007.
The Hearing Officer, in a report dated 26 July 2006, took the view that the right of the parties to be heard had been respected [3] OJ C 54, 9.3.2007.
I sin analyse af hovedtransaktionen vurderede Kommissionen markederne for ethylenoxid (»EO«) og en række derivater heraf (»EODs«), især alkohol ethoxylater, glycolethere (»GEs«) og ethanolaminer (»EOAs«).
In its examination of the main transaction, the Commission assessed the markets for ethylene oxide (EO) and for a number of its derivatives (EODs), in particular, alcohol ethoxylates, glycol ethers (GEs) and ethanolamines (EOAs).
Kommissionen konkluderede, at hovedtransaktionen ikke gav anledning til alvorlig tvivl med hensyn til foreneligheden med fællesmarkedet på de horisontale og vertikale markeder.
The Commission concluded that that main transaction did not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market on the horizontally and vertically related markets.
EO er en farveløs gas, der fremstilles ved delvis oxidering af ethylen.
EO is a colourless gas, which is produced by the partial oxidation of the ethylene.
EO har et ethylenindhold på 82 % og er et farligt produkt, der er stærkt antændeligt og eksplosivt.
EO has an ethylene content of 82 % and is a hazardous product, being highly inflammable and explosive.
Det er også toksisk og kræftfremkaldende.
It is also toxic and carcinogenic.
EO i urenset tilstand anvendes til fremstilling af EGs og kan renses yderligere.
EO can be used in the non-purified state to produce EGs or be further purified.
EGs er kemiske mellemprodukter, der fortrinsvis fremstilles ved ikke-katalytisk hydratation af EO.
EGs are intermediate chemicals produced mainly by the non-catalytic hydration of EO.
EGs tegner sig for 37,5 % af EØS’ samlede forbrug af EO og produceres udelukkende af integrerede EO-producenter.
EGs account for 37,5 % of total EEA consumption of EO and are only produced by integrated EO producers.
En alternativ metode for forarbejdning af EO er yderligere rensning. Renset EO kan derefter anvendes til fremstilling af forskellige andre kemiske mellemprodukter.
An alternative route for processing EO involves its further purification: purified EO can then be used for production of various other chemical intermediates.
Størstedelen af denne rensede EO bruges internt af de integrerede EO-producenter ved senere fremstilling af EO-derivater, den resterende del sælges til tredjeparter, som konkurrerer med EO-producenter på forskellige markeder for EO-derivater.
Most of this purified EO is used captively by the integrated EO producers in downstream operations to produce EO derivatives, the remainder is sold to third parties, which compete with EO producers on the various EO derivatives markets.
Kommissionen har undersøgt ethylenoxid i tidligere sager [4].
The Commission has examined ethylene oxide in previous cases [4].
Den identificerede et særskilt produktmarked for EO, da det, især når det anvendes som direkte råmateriale i kemiske reaktioner, kun i ringe grad er substituerbart.
It identified a separate product market for EO as it is characterised by low substitutability especially when used as a direct raw material in chemical reactions.
Undersøgelsen i denne sag bekræftede denne definition af produktmarkedet.
The investigation in this case confirmed this product market definition.
Da det kun er renset EO, der sælges til tredjeparter, var den konkurrencemæssige analyse i denne sag koncentreret om markedet for renset EO.
As only purified EO is sold to third parties, the competition assessment in this case concentrated on the market for purified EO.
På et sent stadium i proceduren anførte Ineos, at renset EO kan underinddeles yderligere i high-grade EO (»HG-EO«) eller low-grade EO (»LG-EO«) alt efter indhold af urenheder (primært aldehyder).
At a late stage of the proceedings, Ineos submitted that the purified EO could be further sub-segmented into high-grade EO (HG-EO) or low-grade EO (LG-EO) depending on the level of impurities (mainly the content of aldehydes).
Markedsundersøgelsen bekræftede imidlertid, at det ikke var nødvendigt at foretage en yderligere inddeling af det relevante produktmarked efter det rensede EO's renhedsniveau, da HG-EO udelukkende solgtes til tredjeparter.
However, the market investigation confirmed that it was not necessary to further sub-divide relevant product market according to purity levels of the purified EO as only H-G EO was sold to the third parties.
Kommissionen undersøgte endvidere, om det er nødvendigt at skelne mellem langtidsaftaler for levering af EO til kunder, hvis anlæg ligger tæt ved eller i nærheden af EO-leverandørens produktionsanlæg og er forbundet via rørledninger (»on-site«) og leverancer til andre kunder (»off-site«), hvor leveringen sker pr. lastbil eller jernbane.
The Commission also investigated whether a distinction needs to be made between long term arrangements for supply of EO to customers whose plants are located on, or adjacent to, the EO supplier’s site and connected via pipe line (on-site) and supplies to other customers (off-site) which are served by other means such as truck or rail.
Kommissionen konstaterede, at der var visse forskelle med hensyn til prisniveau, kontraktvarighed og købsmængder mellem disse to leveringsformer.
The Commission found that there were some differences in price levels, contract lengths, and quantities purchased between these two supply methods.
Kommissionen skulle imidlertid ikke tage stilling til dette spørgsmål, da fusionen ikke i betydelig grad vil hindre den effektive konkurrence, uanset om on-site- og off-site-leverancer anses for at udgøre et enkelt eller to særskilte markeder.
However, the Commission did not have to make a decision on this issue, given that the transaction would not significantly impede effective competition, irrespective of whether on-site and off-site supplies are considered to constitute a single or two separate markets.
Ethylenglycoler
Ethylene glycols
Ineos hævdede, at EGs i overensstemmelse med Kommissionens tidligere beslutning [5] udgør et særskilt produktmarked.
Ineos submitted that EGs constitute a separate product market, in line with a previous Commission Decision [5].
I en senere beslutning [6] havde Kommissionen imidlertid konstateret, at det på grund af efterspørgselsrelaterede betragtninger måske kunne blive nødvendigt at skelne mellem forskellige typer EGs. Det drejer sig om mono-ethylenglycol (»MEG«), di-ethylenglycol (»DEG«) og tri-ethylenglycol (»TEG«).
However, in a subsequent decision [6], the Commission had noted that demand-side considerations might make it necessary to distinguish between the different types of EG. These are: mono-ethylene glycol (MEG), di-ethylene glycol (DEG) and tri-ethylene glycol (TEG).
MEG tegner sig for langt størstedelen af produktionen (ca. 90 %), og den resterende produktion fordeler sig mellem DEG (ca. 9 %) og TEG (ca. 1 %).
MEG accounts for the great majority of the production (about 90 %), with the remaining production divided between DEG (about 9 %) and TEG (about 1 %).
I denne sag tilkendegav hovedparten af aktørerne på markedet, at EGs bør inddeles yderligere i tre markeder for MEG, DEG og TEG, fordi de anvendes til forskellige formål og slet ikke er substituerbare.
In this case, the majority of market participants indicated that EGs should be further segmented into three markets, for MEG, DEG and TEG, because they are used in very different applications and are not substitutable to any extent.
Fra et leverandørsynspunkt bliver MEG, DEG og TEG uvægerligt produceret sammen og altid i meget lignende proportioner.
However, from the supply-side point of view, MEG, DEG, TEG are invariably manufactured together and are always produced in very similar proportions.
Den præcise markedsdefinition forbliver åben, da fusionen ikke vil få betydelig indvirkning på den effektive konkurrence hvad angår EGs, uanset hvilken alternativ markedsdefinition der vælges.
The exact market definition was left open as the transaction would not significantly impede effective competition with respect to EGs under any of the alternative product market definitions.
I tidligere beslutninger [7] har Kommissionen fastslået, at det relevante marked for EO sandsynligvis er Vesteuropa (defineret som EØS plus Schweiz), selv om den præcise markedsdefinition forblev åben.
In previous decisions [7] the Commission has considered the geographic dimension of the EO market to be probably Western Europe (defined as the EEA plus Switzerland) although the exact market definition was left open.
I det foreliggende tilfælde ligger de relevante produktionsanlæg i Antwerpen (Belgien), Lavéra (Frankrig) og Dormagen (Tyskland).
In this case the relevant production plants are located in Antwerp (Belgium), Lavera (France) and Dormagen (Germany).
Ineos hævdede, at markedet er EØS-markedet, da EO fra disse anlæg transporteres over lange afstande (ifølge Ineos’ oplysninger i visse tilfælde over 1000 km, selv om størstedelen af leverancerne ligger inden for 600 km).
Ineos submitted that the market is EEA-wide as EO from these plants is transported over long distances (according to Ineos’ data, in some cases more than 1000 km, although the majority of deliveries are within 600 km).
De fleste af kunderne og mindst halvdelen af konkurrenterne fandt imidlertid, at markedet var et regionalt marked.
However, the great majority of customers and at least half of the competitors consider the geographic market to be regional.
Transportafstandene ser ud til at ligge mellem 0 km og 800 km, størstedelen mellem 0 km og 600 km, som følge af transportomkostningerne og det forhold, at der er tale om et farligt produkt.
Shipping distances appear to be between 0 km to 800 km with the large majority between 0 to 600 km, due to transport costs and the hazardous nature of the product.
Som følge af begrænsningerne i transportafstanden identificerede Kommissionen mulige regionale markeder for EO som i) Det Forenede Kongerige og Irland, ii) de skandinaviske lande (Norge, Sverige og Finland), iii) det nordvesteuropæiske fastland (Nederlandene, Danmark, Belgien, Luxemburg, Tyskland, Østrig, det centrale og nordlige Frankrig), iv) Middelhavsområdet (Italien, Portugal, Sydfrankrig, og Spanien) og v) det centrale og østlige Europa.
According to the limitations on transport distance, the Commission identified possible regional markets for EO as: (i) United Kingdom and Ireland, (ii) Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden and Finland), (iii) Mainland North-West Europe, or MNWE (the Netherlands, Denmark, Belgium, Luxemburg, Germany, Austria, Central and Northern France), (iv) the Mediterranean basin (Italy, Portugal, Southern France, and Spain), and (v) Central and Eastern Europe.
Kommissionen konstaterede endvidere, at der var en tendens til, at denne geografiske opdeling af markedet blev bekræftet af regionale prisforskelle og begrænsede handelsstrømme.
In addition, the Commission found out that regional price differences and limited trade flows tend to confirm this geographic market segmentation.
Det var imidlertid ikke nødvendigt at drage nogen konklusion med hensyn til en præcis definition af det geografiske marked for EO, da Kommissionen fastslog, at fusionen ikke ville få nogen betydelig indvirkning på den effektive konkurrence på det mulige geografiske marked (et marked, der dækker hele EØS eller et marked, der dækker det nordvesteuropæiske fastland, det eneste regionale marked, hvor begge parter er aktive).
However, it was not necessary to conclude as to the exact geographic market definition for EO as the Commission found out that the transaction would not significantly impede effective competition on either possible geographic market (an EEA-wide geographic wide or a MNWE market, the only regional market where both parties were active).
Ineos hævdede, i overensstemmelse med hvad der er hævdet i tidligere beslutninger [8], at det relevante geografiske marked for EGs mindst er Vesteuropa og endog kan være hele verden.
Ineos submitted, in line with what has been argued in previous decisions [8], that the relevant geographic market for EGs is at least Western Europe and even global.
Dette skyldes, at EGs ikke er farlige produkter og derfor let kan transporteres.
This is because EGs are not hazardous products and, in consequence, they are easily transportable.
Priser er sammenlignelige på internationalt plan, og importen til EØS, hovedsagelig fra Mellemøsten og Rusland, repræsenterer ca. 13 % af det samlede forbrug i EØS.
Prices are comparable at a global level, and imports into the EEA, mainly from Middle East and Russia, represent around 13 % of the total EEA consumption.
Størstedelen af deltagerne i markedsundersøgelsen bekræftede, at det geografiske marked i det mindste er EØS-markedet.
The vast majority of the respondents to the market investigation confirmed that the geographic market is at least EEA-wide.
Med henblik på beslutningen blev den præcise definition af markedet stående åbent, da fusionen ikke i betydelig grad vil udgøre en hindring for den effektive konkurrence på fællesmarkedet eller en væsentlig del heraf under nogen af de alternative markedsdefinitioner.
However, for the purposes of the decision, the exact market definition was left open as the transaction would not significantly impede effective competition in the common market or a substantial part of it under any alternative geographic market definitions.
Den samlede størrelse af EO-markedet i EØS, inkl. produktion til internt brug, udgør ca. 3000 ktpa (kilotons om året).
The overall size of the EO market in the EEA, including production for captive use, is around 3000 ktpa (kilotonnes per annum).
Det kommercielle marked repræsenterer ca. 18 % af den samlede produktion eller ca. 560 ktpa fordelt med ca. 33 % på on-site-kunder og 67 % på off-site-kunder.
The merchant market represents around 18 % of the total production or about 560 ktpa, of which about 33 % by value is accounted for by on-site customers and 67 % by off-site customers.
Hvad angår markedsstrukturen er transaktionen en fusion mellem to af de tre største EO-leverandører, hvilket resulterer i samlede markedsandele på over 45 % på basis af en hvilken som helst rimelig definition af det relevante produktmarked og geografiske marked for EO.
In terms of market structure, the transaction is a merger between two of the three largest EO suppliers giving rise to combined market shares above 45 % under any reasonable definition of the relevant product and geographic markets for EO.