natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Endelig fremsatte en eksporterende producent, som ikke var blevet indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling, to krav om ny beregning af normal værdi og eksportpriser, hvilket ikke blev anset for tilstrækkeligt til at begrunde en justering.
Finally, one exporting producer which was granted MET submitted two claims with regard to the calculation of its normal value and export prices, which were not found sufficient to justify an adjustment.
Endnu et krav fra samme eksporterende producent om, at visse logistikomkostninger, som den forretningsmæssigt forbundne importør havde haft, skulle henføres til virksomhedens samlede omsætning i stedet for den pågældende producents omsætning, fordi de vedrørte en generel omstrukturering, som fandt sted i virksomheden i undersøgelsesperioden, blev anset for tilstrækkeligt dokumenteret og blev accepteret.
One further claim by that exporting producer concerning the allocation of certain logistics expenses borne by its related importer on the total company turnover rather than on the turnover of the product concerned, on the grounds that they were linked to a general restructuring which took place in the company during the IP, was considered sufficiently substantiated and was accepted.
Under alle omstændigheder måtte denne eksporterende producents dumpingmargen beregnes på ny, efter at vedkommendes forretningsmæssigt forbundne importør i Fællesskabet havde foretaget korrektioner i listen over de enkelte transaktioner, der var fremlagt til støtte for videresalgspriserne for persulfat i Fællesskabet.
In any event, this exporting producer's dumping margin had to be recalculated, following the corrections made by its related importer in the Community to the transaction-by-transaction listing provided in support of the resale prices for persulphates within the Community.
På dette grundlag udgør dumpingmargenerne udtrykt i procent af cif-importprisen, Fællesskabets grænse, ufortoldet, følgende:
Given the above, the dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, are the following:
ABC Chemicals (Shanghai) Co, Ltd.
ABC Chemicals (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
Degussa-AJ (Shanghai) Initiators Co, Ltd.
Degussa-AJ (Shanghai) Initiators Co., Ltd
I mangel af andre bemærkninger vedrørende fastlæggelse af dumping for så vidt angår Kina bekræftes hermed betragtning 51-97 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the determination of dumping with regard to the PRC, the other provisions of recitals 51 to 97 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Efter den foreløbige fremlæggelse af oplysninger fremsatte den samarbejdende eksporterende producent på ny to krav om justering af handelsled og provision, således som anført i betragtning 101 og 102 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
Following the provisional disclosure, the cooperating exporting producer reiterated two claims for adjustments for level of trade and commissions, as already described in recitals 101 and 102 of the provisional Regulation respectively.
Den eksporterende producents forklaringer, som ikke var væsentligt forskellige fra de forklaringer, som var givet tidligere i proceduren, blev ikke fundet overbevisende.
However, the explanations provided by the exporting producer, which were not substantially different from the explanations that had been received earlier in the proceeding, were not found convincing.
Den eksporterende producent kunne navnlig ikke imødegå visse af argumenterne til støtte for beslutningen om at afvise dennes krav, som anført i forordningen om midlertidig told, og modsagde delvis tidligere erklæringer, der var fremsat under kontrolbesøget på virksomheden.
The exporting producer failed in particular to address some of the arguments supporting the decision to reject its claims as disclosed in the provisional Regulation and partly contradicted prior statements made during the verification visit at its premises.
I mangel af andre bemærkninger vedrørende fastslåelse af dumping for så vidt angår Taiwan bekræftes hermed betragtning 98-105 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the determination of dumping with regard to Taiwan, recitals 98 to 105 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
En eksporterende producent i USA fremsatte på ny et krav om, at den EF-producent, som importerede den pågældende vare fra den forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomhed i Kina, skulle udelukkes fra definitionen af EF-erhvervsgrenen.
One exporting producer in the USA reiterated that the Community producer importing the product concerned from its related company in the PRC should be excluded from the definition of the Community industry.
Det hævdedes, at den kendsgerning, at produktionen var outsourcet til et tredjeland, som er genstand for en antidumpingundersøgelse, i sig selv ville være tilstrækkeligt til at konkludere, at den pågældende producent var beskyttet mod virkningerne af dumpingimport.
It was claimed that the fact that production is outsourced to a third country concerned by an anti-dumping investigation would be in itself sufficient to conclude that the producer concerned would be shielded from the effects of the dumped imports.
Den eksporterende producent hævdede også, at den pågældende producent havde en anden adfærd end en ikke-forretningsmæssigt forbundet EF-producent, hvilket især fremgik af den pågældende producents investeringsaktiviteter i Kina.
The exporting producer also claimed that the producer concerned behaved differently from an unrelated Community producer, which is in particular shown by its investment activity in the PRC.
Det forhold, at en EF-producent har outsourcet sin produktion, anses ikke i sig selv for tilstrækkeligt til at udelukke denne producent fra definitionen af EF-erhvervsgrenen.
It is considered that the fact that a Community producer outsourced production is not per se sufficient reason to exclude this producer from the definition of the Community industry.
Det burde først undersøges, om den pågældende EF-producent var beskyttet mod virkningerne af dumpingimport.
Indeed, it should first be examined whether the Community producer concerned was shielded from the effects of the dumped imports.
Det blev i den forbindelse konstateret, jf. betragtning 106 og 151 i forordningen om midlertidig told, at de mængder, der blev importeret fra den forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomhed i Kina, ikke var særligt store, og at importen kun gennemførtes for at beholde globale kunder.
In this regard, as mentioned in recital 106 and 151 of the provisional Regulation, it was found that the quantities imported from the related company in the PRC were small and were only made to maintain global customers.
Denne import udgjorde under 7 % af denne producents samlede salg på EF-markedet.
These imports constituted less than 7 % of the total sales of this producer on the Community market.
Dette tydede på, at den pågældende producent var engageret i produktionen i Fællesskabet, og at importen snarere var en form for selvforsvar.
This indicated that the producer in question was committed to the production in the Community and that imports were rather an act of self-defence.
For så vidt angår EF-producentens investeringer i Kina forklarede den klagende eksporterende producent ikke, hvordan disse investeringer havde beskyttet EF-producenten mod virkningerne af dumpingimporten, således som det hævdedes.
As far as the investment by the Community producer in the PRC is concerned, the claimant exporting producer did not explain how these investments had indeed shielded the Community producer from the effects of the dumped imports, as claimed.
Ovennævnte argumenter måtte derfor afvises.
The above arguments had therefore to be rejected.
Samme eksporterende producent hævdede, at et af hovedkriterierne for at konkludere, at den pågældende EF-producent var en del af EF-erhvervsgrenen, var, at videresalgspriserne på EF-markedet lå på et højere niveau end importpriserne fra Kina.
The same exporting producer alleged that one of the main criteria to conclude that the Community producer in question formed part of the Community industry was that the resale prices on the Community market were at a higher level than the import prices from the PRC.
Den eksporterende producent fremførte, at videresalgspriserne burde være sammenlignet med den gennemsnitlige importpris fra alle berørte lande og ikke kun med importpriserne fra Kina.
The exporting producer claimed that resale prices should have been compared to the average import price from all countries concerned, rather than only those from the PRC.
Niveauet for videresalgspriserne var dog kun en af de supplerende faktorer, der var taget i betragtning (jf. også betragtning 106 i forordningen om midlertidig told).
However the level of the resale prices was only one additional element which had been considered (see also recital 106 of the provisional Regulation).
Videresalgsprisen viste, at EF-producenten ikke lå under de kinesiske konkurrenters priser, hvilket ville have skadet EF-erhvervsgrenen.
The resale price indicated that the Community producer did not undercut its Chinese competitors, which would have harmed the Community industry.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende EF-produktionen og EF-erhvervsgrenen, bekræftes hermed betragtning 106 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any other comments concerning Community production and Community industry, recital 106 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
En eksporterende producent i USA hævdede, at dennes eksportsalg til en forretningsmæssigt forbundet bruger i Fællesskabet burde udelukkes ved fastsættelsen af det samlede forbrug i Fællesskabet, idet dette salg ikke gik til »handelsmarkedet«.
One exporting producer in the USA claimed that its export sales to its related user in the Community should be excluded from the determination of the total consumption in the Community on the basis that these sales were not made to the ‘merchant market’.
Forbrug defineres som al import til Fællesskabet fra alle kilder og alt salg af den pågældende vare fra EF-erhvervsgrenen på EF-markedet.
Consumption is defined as the total of all imports into the Community from all sources and all sales of the product concerned from the Community industry on the Community market.
Det forhold, at import sker til forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomheder i Fællesskabet, er irrelevant og er ikke til hinder for at tage dette salg i betragtning ved beregningen af det samlede EF-forbrug.
The fact that imports are made to related companies in the Community is irrelevant and does not prevent these sales from being taken into consideration when calculating the total Community consumption.
Den eksporterende producents påstand måtte derfor afvises.
The exporting producer's claim in this respect was therefore rejected.
I mangel af bemærkninger vedrørende EF-forbruget bekræftes hermed betragtning 107, 108 og 109 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the Community consumption, recitals 107, 108 and 109 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
De to amerikanske eksportører fremførte, at importen af persulfat med oprindelse i USA ikke burde kumuleres ved vurdering af den skade, der var påført EF-erhvervsgrenen.
The two exporters in the USA claimed that for the purpose of assessing injury suffered by the Community industry, imports of persulphates originating in the USA should be decumulated.
Begge eksporterende producenter anførte, at importpriserne fra USA lå på et højere niveau og viste en anden tendens end importpriserne fra Kina og Taiwan.
Both exporting producers submitted that import prices from the USA were at a higher level and showed trends which differed from import prices from the PRC and Taiwan.
Dette skulle angiveligt vise, at varen, der var eksporteret fra USA, blev solgt under andre markedsvilkår.
This would show that the product exported from the USA was sold under different market conditions.
En af de eksporterende producenter gjorde desuden gældende, at dennes salg til en forretningsmæssigt forbundet bruger i Fællesskabet burde behandles særskilt, fordi det fandt sted på andre markedsvilkår og viste en anden tendens.
One of the exporting producers further argued that its sales made to its related user in the Community should be considered separately because they would be made under different market conditions and show different trends.
Denne eksporterende producent påstod således, at importmængden fra USA til ikke-forretningsmæssigt forbundne kunder ikke voksede eller kun voksede ubetydeligt.
Thus, this exporting producer alleged that the import volume from the USA to unrelated customers did not increase nor did so only insignificantly.
Begge eksporterende producenter krævede, at importpriserne blev oplyst for hvert enkelt land.
Both exporting producers requested that import prices per country concerned be disclosed.
Med hensyn til priser blev det som nævnt i betragtning 112 i forordningen om midlertidig told konstateret, at eksportpriserne fra Kina, Taiwan og USA viste ens tendenser (faldende) i den betragtede periode, og at EF-priserne i betragtelig grad blev underbudt.
As far as prices are concerned, and as already mentioned in recital 112 of the provisional Regulation, it was found that export prices from the PRC, Taiwan and the USA showed a similar trend (decreasing) during the period considered and were significantly undercutting the Community prices.
Det bemærkes, at de foreløbige konklusioner bygger på verificerede faktiske eksportdata, der er fremlagt af de samarbejdende eksporterende producenter.
It is noted that the provisional conclusions are based on verified actual export data supplied by the cooperating exporting producers.
Disse data blev anset for at udgøre den mest pålidelige informationskilde, der var til rådighed.
These data were considered as the most reliable source of information available.
Den gennemsnitlige importpris som oplyst af de eksporterende producenter måtte derfor afvises.
The average import price supplied by the exporting producers had therefore to be rejected.
Følgende gennemsnitlige importpriser er fastsat for hvert af de pågældende lande.
The following average import prices have been determined for each country concerned.
Nedenstående tabel viser, at importpriserne fra alle de pågældende lande havde den samme, dvs. faldende, tendens.
The table below shows that the import prices from all countries concerned had a similar, i.e. decreasing trend.
Gennemsnitlige importpriser for hvert af de pågældende lande
Average import prices per country concerned
USA EUR/ton
USA EUR/tonne
USA — indeks
USA index
Taiwan EUR/ton
Taiwan EUR/tonne
Taiwan — indeks
Taiwan index
Kina EUR/ton
PRC EUR/tonne
Kina — indeks
PRC index
De pågældende lande i alt (EUR/ton)
Total countries concerned (EUR/tonne)
De pågældende lande i alt (indeks)
Total countries concerned (index)
Med hensyn til importmængder bekræftes undersøgelsesresultaterne i betragtning 111 i forordningen om midlertidig told, dvs. at eksportmængden fra USA var betydelig i den i grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 4, anvendte betydning, og at tendensen var stigende.
As far as import volumes are concerned, the findings of recital 111 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed, i.e. the export volume from the USA was significant within the meaning of Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation and showed an increasing trend.
Eksporten fra USA blev også i betydelig grad dumpet, og der blev konstateret et betragteligt underbud.
Exports from the USA were also significantly dumped and showed substantial undercutting.
Alle varetyper blev eksporteret fra USA af de to samarbejdende eksporterende producenter, og halvdelen af eksporten af kaliummonopersulfat skete til ikke-forretningsmæssigt forbundne kunder.
All product types were exported from the USA by the two cooperating exporting producer and half of the exports of KMPS were also made to unrelated customers.
Det blev derfor konkluderet, at varen, der blev eksporteret fra USA, blev solgt gennem de samme salgskanaler og til den samme type kunder i Fællesskabet, som den vare, der produceredes og solgtes af EF-erhvervsgrenen på EF-markedet, og den vare, der importeredes fra de øvrige pågældende lande.
Thus, it was concluded that the product exported from the USA was sold through the same sales channels and to the same type of customers in the Community as the product produced and sold by the Community industry on the Community market and the product imported from the other countries concerned.
Selv hvis den pågældende eksporterende producents salg af kaliummonopersulfat til den forretningsmæssigt forbundne bruger i Fællesskabet blev udelukket fra analysen, ville dette ikke ændre ved det overordnede billede.
Nonetheless, even if KMPS sales of the exporting producer concerned made to the related user in the Community were excluded from the analysis, this would not change the overall picture.
Markedsandelene fra USA ville stadig være over bagatelgrænsen og stadig vise en stigende tendens.
Market shares from the USA would still be above the de minimis threshold and would still show an increasing trend.
Samtidig ville importpriserne stadig vise en faldende tendens.
Likewise, import prices would still show a decreasing trend.
På baggrund af ovenstående blev de to eksporterende producenters krav om ikke at kumulere importen fra USA ved vurdering af den væsentlige skade, der var påført EF-erhvervsgrenen, anset for uberettiget og afvist.
On the basis of the above, the two exporting producers' claim to decumulate imports from the USA when assessing the material injury suffered by the Community industry was not warranted and was rejected.
En importør hævdede, at importen fra leverandøren i Taiwan faldt, hvis man tog en længere periode i betragtning, end den periode, der var omfattet af denne undersøgelse.
One importer claimed that imports from its supplier in Taiwan decreased when considering a period longer than the period considered of this investigation.
Importøren fremlagde imidlertid ingen tal til støtte for sin påstand eller nogen angivelse af den tidsperiode, han refererede til.
This importer did not, however, submit any figure in support of its claim, or any indication of the time period he was referring to.
I analysen af tendenser har det længe været EF-institutionernes praksis at betragte en periode, der omfatter undersøgelsesperioden plus de foregående tre eller fire år, hvilket anses for en rimelig periode til vurdering af tendenser, og der er ingen objektiv begrundelse for at fravige denne praksis.
Furthermore, it is the Community institutions' long standing practice to consider a period including the IP plus the preceding three or four years in the trend analysis, which is considered a reasonable period to evaluate trends and there is no objective reason to deviate from this practice.
Det noteres også, at importen fra Taiwan, jf. betragtning 114 i forordningen om midlertidig told (tabel 2), steg med næsten 20 % i den betragtede periode, hvilket medførte en lille stigning i markedsandelen (jf. betragtning 115 i forordningen om midlertidig told) i den betragtede periode.
It is also noted that, as shown in recital 114 of the provisional Regulation (Table 2), imports from Taiwan increased by almost 20 % during the period considered which translated also in a slight increase of market share (see recital 115 of the provisional Regulation) over the period considered.
Importøren fremsatte ingen anden begrundelse for, at Taiwan ikke skulle kumuleres med de øvrige lande, og det fremgik heller ikke af undersøgelsen, at der skulle være grund til det.
The importer did not put forward any other reason why Taiwan should be decumulated from the remaining countries concerned, nor did the investigation reveal any reason.
Importørens påstand måtte derfor afvises.
The importer's claim in this respect has therefore to be rejected.
Da der ikke blev fremsat yderligere bemærkninger i denne forbindelse, bekræftes undersøgelsesresultaterne i betragtning 110-113 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any further comments in this particular respect, the findings in recitals 110 to 113 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Import til Fællesskabet fra de pågældende lande, markedsandele og priser
Imports into the Community from the countries concerned, market share and prices
På baggrund af undersøgelsesresultaterne i betragtning 31-34 skulle den kinesiske eksporterende producents eksportsalg, som man anså for at være dumpet, medtages i analyserne af importmængde, markedsandel og priser for Kina, og tallene i tabel 2-4 (betragtning 114-116 i forordningen om midlertidig told) tilpasses i overensstemmelse hermed:
Given the findings in recitals 31 to 34, export sales of the Chinese exporting producer which were found to be dumped had to be included in the analyses of import volume, market share and prices from the PRC and the figures in Tables 2 to 4 (recitals 114 to 116 of the provisional Regulation had therefore to be adapted accordingly, as follows:
Importen fra de pågældende lande steg med 53 % mellem 2003 og undersøgelsesperioden.
Imports from the countries concerned increased by 53 % between 2003 and the IP.
Denne import udgjorde 9839 ton i 2003, men voksede til 15065 ton i undersøgelsesperioden.
While these imports amounted to 9839 tonnes in 2003 they reached a level of 15065 tonnes during the IP.
Importstigningen var særligt markant mellem 2003 og 2004, hvor importen steg med 38 %.
The increase of imports was particularly marked between 2003 and 2004 since they rose by 38 %.
De pågældende landes markedsandele
Market shared of the countries concerned
De pågældende landes markedsandele steg mellem 2003 og undersøgelsesperioden fra 25,3 % til 36,1 %, dvs. med 10,8 procentpoint.
The market share held by the countries concerned increased between 2003 and the IP from 25,3 % to 36,1 %, i.e. by 10,8 percentage points.
Denne stigning var særligt markant mellem 2003 og 2004, hvor den var på 7 procentpoint.
The increase was particularly marked between 2003 and 2004 when it went up by 7 percentage points.
Fra 2003 til undersøgelsesperioden faldt importpriserne fra de pågældende lande med 13 %.
From 2003 to the IP, prices of the imports from the countries concerned decreased by 13 %.
De faldt således fra 902 EUR/ton i 2003 til 784 EUR/ton i undersøgelsesperioden.
Thus, they decreased from EUR 902/tonne in 2003 to EUR 784/tonne in the IP.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger i denne forbindelse, bekræftes undersøgelsesresultaterne i betragtning 114-119 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any other comments in this particular regard the findings and conclusions set out in recitals 114 to 119 of the provisional Regulation, are confirmed.
De to eksporterende producenter i USA hævdede, at EF-erhvervsgrenen havde »rimelige« fortjenstmargener i undersøgelsesperioden, og at den i hvert fald ikke led tab, og det kan derfor ikke konkluderes, at den led væsentlig skade i undersøgelsesperioden.
The two exporting producers in the USA claimed that the Community industry realised ‘reasonable’ profit margins during the IP, and in any case was not loss making, and it cannot therefore be concluded that it suffered material injury during the IP.
En af de amerikanske eksporterende producenter fremførte endvidere, at den høje fortjenstmargen i 2003 også var et tegn på, at EF-erhvervsgrenen ikke led nogen væsentlig skade.
One of the exporting producers in the USA further claimed that the high profit margins realised in 2003 would also be an indication that the Community industry did not suffer any material injury.
I overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 5, skal undersøgelsen af dumpingimportens virkninger på EF-erhvervsgrenen omfatte en vurdering af alle relevante faktorer og forhold, der har indflydelse på EF-erhvervsgrenens situation.
In accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the impact of the dumped imports must include an evaluation of all relevant factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Community industry.
I den forbindelse er ingen af faktorerne isoleret set udslagsgivende.
In this respect, none of the factors in isolation can give decisive guidance.