natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Priserne skal ses i lyset af ovenstående udvikling i importmængder og ligeledes i lyset af, at de faldt mindre end priserne i de berørte lande, men navnlig forblev deres absolutte prisniveau i hele den pågældende periode med én undtagelse i gennemsnit langt højere end prisniveauet for dumpingimporten.
As to prices, they should be seen in the light of the above evolution of import volume, and also with the fact that they decreased to a lesser extent as compared to the prices of the countries concerned, but especially their absolute price level during the overall period considered remained, with one exception, on average far above the price level of the dumped imports.
Af ovenstående grunde konkluderes det endeligt, at importen fra andre tredjelande ikke havde nogen væsentlig indvirkning på EF-erhvervsgrenens situation.
For the above reasons, it is definitively concluded that the imports from other third countries did not materially affect the situation of the Community industry.
Forskellige eksporterende producenter og importører gentog deres påstande om, at skaden, der var forvoldt på EF-erhvervsgrenen, skyldtes euroens opskrivning i forhold til den amerikanske dollar, hvilket førte til et betydeligt fald i importpriser.
Various exporting producers and importers reiterated their claims that the injury suffered by the Community industry was caused by the appreciation of the euro against the USD which led to significant import price decreases.
Det fremkom ingen nye oplysninger, og der henvises derfor til betragtning 220-225 i den midlertidige forordning.
No new elements were given, and it is therefore referred to recitals 220 to 225 of the provisional Regulation.
Det bemærkes også, at selv om man medgiver, at svingninger i valutakurser havde en indvirkning på importpriserne, ville alene omfanget af den pågældende import betyde, at EF-erhvervsgrenen ville lide væsentlig skade.
It is also to be noted that, even if one were to accept that exchange rate fluctuations had an effect on import prices, the volume alone of the imports concerned were of such a magnitude as to cause material injury to the Community industry.
Der er ikke fremkommet nye oplysninger om dette.
No new elements have been put forward in that respect.
Det skal imidlertid bemærkes, at i lyset af den stigende import i sidste kvartal af undersøgelsesperioden, kan dette have forstærket dumpingimportens skadevirkninger.
It should however be noted that given the acceleration of the imports during the last quarter of the IP, this may indeed have exacerbated the injurious effects of those dumped imports.
Klagerne har ikke moderniseret, er stærkt fragmenterede og har høje arbejdskraftomkostninger
Complainants have failed to modernise, are highly fragmented and have high labour costs
Det skal også bemærkes, at dumpingmargenerne er forholdsvis høje (dvs. endnu højere end underbudsmargenerne).
It should also be noted that the dumping margins are comparatively high (i.e. even higher than the undercutting margins).
Den pågældende dumpingeksport konkurrerer med andre ord ikke med EF-erhvervsgrenen med hensyn til naturlige fordele, men på grundlag af en praksis, der indklages i henhold til de internationale handelsregler.
In other words, the dumped exports concerned compete with the Community industry not on the level of natural advantages, but on the basis of a practice which is actionable under international trade rules.
Uden dumping ville priserne på den pågældende import have været langt højere, og EF-erhvervsgrenen ville have stået i en langt stærkere konkurrencesituation over for denne import.
On a non-dumped level, prices of the imports concerned would have been much higher and the Community industry would have been in a much stronger competitive situation vis-à-vis these imports.
EF-erhvervsgrenens produktionsudflytning
EC footwear industries re-location of production
Forskellige eksporterende producenter og en sammenslutning af importører hævdede, at virkningen af EF-producenternes udflytning på EF-erhvervsgrenens situation ikke var behandlet tilstrækkeligt grundigt i den midlertidige forordning.
Various exporting producers and an association of importers claimed that the effect of the re-location of EC producers on the situation of the Community industry had not been sufficiently addressed in the provisional Regulation.
De kritiserede navnlig tallene i betragtning 171 i den midlertidige forordning vedrørende Fællesskabets fodtøjssektor overordnet set, eftersom disse tal indeholder oplysninger vedrørende EF-producenter, der har udflyttet deres produktion.
They criticised in particular the figures provided in the recital 171 of the provisional Regulation, related to the overall Community footwear sector, on the grounds that those figures include data related to Community producers that have delocalised production.
I denne henseende henvises der til ovenstående afsnit, hvor det bekræftes, at betragtning 169-173 i den midlertidige forordning kun er af vejledende karakter og dermed ikke juridisk relevant for de endelige konklusioner om skade.
In this respect, reference is made to the above paragraph confirming that the recitals 169 to 173 of the provisional Regulation were given for information only, thus not legally relevant in the context of the definitive conclusions on injury.
Det bekræftes derfor ligeledes, at producenter, der har udflyttet hele deres produktion fra Fællesskabet, ikke er medtaget i definitionen af EF-erhvervsgrenen, og muligheden af, at disse virksomheder har kunnet forårsage skade på EF-erhvervsgrenen, analyseres sammen med virkningerne af import fra andre tredjelande.
It is therefore also confirmed that those producers that fully delocalised their production outside the Community are not included in the definition of Community industry, and therefore the extent to which those companies would have also caused injury to the Community industry is analysed together with the impact of the imports from other third countries.
Hvad angår de virksomheder, der har udflyttet dele af deres produktion, dvs. ved også at købe fodtøj fra kilder uden for Fællesskabet, erindres der om, at skadesanalysen udelukkende er foretaget for oplysninger om deres egenproduktion inden for Fællesskabet.
As concerns the case of those companies that partly delocalised their production, i.e. by also purchasing footwear from non-Community sources, it is recalled that the injury analysis has been made exclusively with respect to data pertaining to their own production in the Community.
Hvorvidt sådanne indkøb har forvoldt dem skade, skal også ses i sammenhæng med analysen af import fra andre tredjelande.
Therefore, the extent to which such purchases may as well have caused them any injury should also be seen in the light of the analysis of the imports from other third countries.
Endelig for virksomheder, der har forøget eller påbegyndt import af dele af fodtøj (f.eks. overdele) til Fællesskabet, kan denne import ikke anses for at have haft negative virkninger på de fleste af skadesindikatorerne som produktion, salg, rentabilitet osv., af de samme årsager som ovenfor.
Finally, for those companies who increased or commenced imports of parts of footwear (e.g. uppers) in the Community, those imports can not be deemed to have negatively affected most of the injury indicators such as production, sales, profitability etc. for the reasons explained above.
Det er korrekt, som nogle af de interesserede parter har påpeget, at dette kan have ført til faldende beskæftigelse i Fællesskabet, men dette skal også ses som en handling i selvforsvar fra virksomheder, der står over for kraftigt stigende import til dumpingpriser på Fællesskabets marked, og det skyldes snarere forekomsten af dumping end skade, som de har påført sig selv.
It is true, as pointed out by some interested parties, that this may have led to a decrease of employment in the Community, but this should also be seen as an act of self defence by companies facing vastly increasing imports at dumped prices on the Community market, thus related to the existence of dumping rather than any self-inflicted injury.
De interesserede parters påstande blev derfor afvist, og resultaterne og konklusionerne i den midlertidige forordning bekræftes.
The claims of the interested parties were therefore rejected, and the findings and conclusions of the provisional Regulation confirmed.
Det konkluderes derfor endeligt, at dumpingimporten med oprindelse i de berørte lande har forårsaget væsentlig skade på EF-erhvervsgrenen, jf. grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 6, og at på grundlag af analysen, hvor der omhyggeligt sondres mellem alle kendte faktorers virkning på EF-erhvervsgrenens situation og dumpingimportens skadelige virkning, bekræftes det hermed, at de øvrige faktorer ikke i sig selv ændrer det forhold, at den konstaterede skade må tilskrives dumpingimporten.
It is therefore definitively concluded that the dumped imports originating in the countries concerned have caused material injury to the Community industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation, and that given the analysis which has properly distinguished and separated the effects of all the known factors on the situation of the Community industry from the injurious effects of the dumped imports, these other factors as such did not reverse the fact that the material injury assessed must be attributed to the dumped imports.
Det er blevet undersøgt, om den midlertidige konklusion om, at der af hensyn til Fællesskabets interesser skal gribes ind for at forhindre den skadevoldende dumping, bør ændres i lyset af bemærkningerne og/eller supplerende oplysninger, som de interesserede parter er fremkommet med efter den midlertidige forordning.
It has been analysed whether in light of the comments and/or additional elements provided by the interested parties following the imposition of the provisional Regulation, the provisional conclusion that the Community interest called for intervention to prevent the injurious dumping should be modified.
Nogle importører og eksporterende producenter anførte, at indførelsen af foranstaltninger ikke ville være i EF-erhvervsgrenens interesse.
Certain importers and exporting producers argued that the imposition of measures would not be in the interest of the Community industry.
Dette er hovedsagelig baseret på påstande om, at klagernes produktion supplerer importen fra de berørte lande, at indførelsen af antidumpingforanstaltninger ville forårsage en omfattende flytning af importen fra de berørte lande til andre tredjelande, og at den skade, der er forvoldt på EF-erhvervsgrenen, ikke skyldes dumping, samt at klagerne har mistet markedsandele gennem mange år angiveligt på grund af andre faktorer end dumping.
This is mainly based on the claims that the production of the complainants complement the imports from the countries concerned, that the imposition of anti-dumping measures would cause a major displacement of imports from countries concerned to other third countries, and that finally the injury suffered by the Community industry was not be caused by dumping and that the complainants have lost market shares over many years allegedly due to factors other than dumping.
Det skal først bemærkes, at det i den midlertidige forordning og ovenstående analyse klart slås fast, at der forekommer dumping, der skader EF-erhvervsgrenen, og at denne skade fra og med 2004 må betegnes som væsentlig på grund af dumpingpraksis fra de berørte landes side.
It should firstly be noted that the provisional Regulation and the above analysis clearly established the existence of dumping causing injury to the Community industry, which qualifies as of 2004 as material injury sustained due to dumping practices from the countries concerned.
Derfor forventes det i princippet, at fjernelsen af den væsentlige skade, der skyldes dumping, er i EF-erhvervsgrenens interesse.
It is therefore in principle expected that the removal of the material injury caused by dumping is in the interest of the Community industry.
Påstanden om, at klagernes produktion blot supplerer importen, blev afvist i lyset af ovenstående konklusioner om, at den pågældende vare konkurrerer med det samme produkt, der fremstilles og sælges i Fællesskabet.
The allegation that the production of the complainants merely complements the imports was rejected given the above conclusions that the product concerned competes with the like product produced and sold in the Community.
Det forhold, at EF-erhvervsgrenen har indgivet en klage imod import af den pågældende vare, antyder også, at der er tale om konkurrence mellem produkter fremstillet i Fællesskabet og produkter importeret fra de berørte lande.
The fact that the Community industry lodged a complaint against imports of the product concerned also suggests that competition take place between Community manufactured products and those imported from the countries concerned.
Påstanden om, at der er sket en flytning af importen, er fremført tidligere, og der henvises til betragtning 241 i den midlertidige forordning, hvor det konkluderes, at det forhold, at importører kan gå over til andre leverandørlande, ikke er nogen gyldig grund til ikke at skride ind over for dumping, der forårsager væsentlig skade, og at det under alle omstændigheder er umuligt at forudse, hvor omfattende et sådant skift vil være og heller ikke omstændighederne vedrørende denne import, dvs. om den dumpes eller ej.
The claim concerning any displacement of the imports was already made earlier, and reference is made to the recital 241 of the provisional Regulation where it was concluded that the fact that importers may shift to other supplier countries is certainly not a valid reason for not taking actions against materially injurious dumping, and that it is in any event impossible to anticipate the extent to which such a shift would take place, nor the conditions of those imports, i.e. whether they are dumped or not.
Hvad angår den sidste påstand henvises der til ovenstående analyse af årsagssammenhængen, hvor virkningen af andre faktorer end dumping gennemgås.
As regards the last claim, reference is made to the causation analysis above where the impact of the factors other than dumping was examined.
Det ligger under alle omstændigheder fast, at den faldende produktion hos Fællesskabets fodtøjsbranche og den dermed faldende markedsandel, er blevet fremskyndet som følge af dumpingimporten.
In any event it is clear that the decrease of the production volume of the Community footwear industry, thus decline in market share, was accelerated by the emergence of the dumped imports.
Dette må nødvendigvis være tilfældet i en situation med et stabilt forbrug inden for Fællesskabet.
This obviously has to be the case in the situation of a stable Community consumption.
I mangel af yderligere begrundede bemærkninger bekræftes de midlertidige resultater, og det konkluderes endeligt, at indførelsen af antidumpingforanstaltninger vil gøre det muligt for EF-erhvervsgrenen at rejse sig efter virkningerne af den konstaterede skadevoldende dumping.
In the absence of further substantiated comments, the provisional findings are confirmed, and it is definitively concluded that the imposition of anti-dumping measures would allow the Community industry to recover from the effects of materially injurious dumping found.
ANDRE ØKONOMISKE OPERATØRERS INTERESSER
INTEREST OF THE OTHER ECONOMIC OPERATORS
I den midlertidige fase er der ikke modtaget bemærkninger fra forbrugerorganisationer efter offentliggørelsen af meddelelsen om indførelse af midlertidige foranstaltninger.
As at the provisional stage, no representations were received from consumers' organisations following the publication of the imposition of provisional measures.
Den midlertidige konklusion om, at forbrugerpriserne på læderfodtøj kun vil blive marginalt påvirket af indførelsen af endelige foranstaltninger, blev derfor ikke anfægtet af nogen af de organisationer, der repræsenterer forbrugernes interesser.
The provisional conclusion that consumer leather footwear prices would only be marginally affected by the imposition of definitive measures was therefore not challenged by any association representing the interest of the consumers.
Nogle eksporterende producenter hævdede, at de ikke var enige i konklusionerne vedrørende foranstaltningers begrænsede indvirkning på forbrugerne, og at disse foranstaltninger ville medføre en betydelig stigning i husholdningernes udgifter.
Certain exporting producers claimed that they did not agree with the findings concerning the limited impact of measures on consumers, and that those measures would result in a major increase in household costs.
Importørerne fremførte ligeledes, at forbrugerpriserne ville stige som følge af de endelige foranstaltninger, og at denne prisstigning endda procentuelt kunne være lige så stor som en eventuel værditold.
Importers also argued that consumer prices would increase as a result of definitive measures, and that this price increase may even reach the percentage of any ad valorem duty.
Denne påstand er baseret på en antagelse om, at importører normalt lægger deres avance oven i importprisen, inklusive afgifter, og at de derfor også vil få en avance på bl.a. antidumpingtolden.
This claim is based on the allegation that importers usually apply their mark-up to the landed import price, including any duties, and thus they would therefore apply a margin also on the anti-dumping duties, amongst other elements.
På den anden side har nogle importører hævdet, at de ikke vil kunne skubbe tolden over på forbrugerne med den begrundelse, at det er forbrugerne, der fastsætter prisniveauet, og at forbrugerne derfor ikke vil købe bestemte sko, hvis de overstiger en givet pris.
On the other hand, certain importers have however claimed that they would not be in a position to pass on any duties to consumers, on the grounds that it is the consumers that set the level of prices, and that consumers would therefore not purchase certain footwear if it would exceed a given price.
For det første har eksporterende producenter ikke nogen status med hensyn til Fællesskabets interesser under de nuværende bestemmelser.
First of all, exporting producers do not have standing on Community interest under current rules.
For god ordens skyld er deres argumenter alligevel blevet undersøgt.
Their points have nevertheless been analysed for the sake of argument.
Det understreges, at disse parter ikke var enige i Kommissionens konklusioner vedrørende foranstaltningernes indvirkning på forbrugerne, men alligevel fremlagde de ikke specifikke data eller oplysninger til støtte for deres påstande.
It should be underlined that those parties that did not agree with the Commission's findings concerning the impact of the measures on consumers, did however not submit any specific data or information that could support their claims.
I stedet fremførte de som nævnt ovenfor modstridende udtalelser om, at tolden enten ville blive skubbet videre til forbrugerne (og endda endnu mere på grund af avancer på tolden), eller at det slet ikke ville være muligt at skubbe virkningerne af tolden over på forbrugerne.
Instead, as reported above, they even provided contradictory statements claiming that duties would be either fully passed on to consumers (and even more by applying mark-ups also on the duty) or that it would not be possible at all to pass on any effect of duties.
Deres påstande blev derfor ikke anset for tilstrækkelig grund til at ændre de midlertidige konklusioner.
Their claims were therefore not considered sufficient to alter the provisional findings.
Desuden hævdede nogle eksporterende producenter, at indførelsen af foranstaltninger ville begrænse forbrugernes valgmuligheder i betydelig grad.
In addition certain exporting producers claimed that the imposition of measures would significantly limit consumers' choice.
Dette er baseret på en påstand om, at visse typer af læderfodtøj kun fremstilles i Kina og Vietnam, at antidumpingtold angiveligt ville føre til en beslutning om ikke at fremstille visse typer af fodtøj, og at Fællesskabets producenter ikke ville have kapacitet til at forsyne Fællesskabets marked med disse typer.
This is based on the allegation that certain types of leather footwear are only produced in China and Vietnam, that anti-dumping duties would allegedly result in a decision not to produce certain types of footwear and that the Community producers would not have the capacity to supply the Community market with those types.
Disse påstande om et reduceret udvalg af fodtøj er allerede fremført tidligere og behandles i betragtning 246 i den midlertidige forordning.
These allegations of a reduced choice of footwear were already made earlier and addressed in the recital 246 of the provisional Regulation.
Desuden er påstanden om at visse typer fodtøj ikke længere vil blive fremstillet, og at Fællesskabets producenter ikke ville have tilstrækkelig kapacitet til at udfylde den påståede mangel, ikke underbygget med objektive oplysninger eller beviser og blev derfor afvist.
In addition, the claim that certain types of footwear would no longer be produced and that the Community producers would not have enough capacity to substitute the alleged shortages is a simple allegation that was not supported by any objective facts or evidence, and was therefore rejected.
Endelig blev udelukkelsen af børnefodtøj taget op til fornyet overvejelse i lyset af argumenterne fra EF-erhvervsgrenen.
Finally, the exclusion of children's footwear was reconsidered given the arguments given by the Community industry.
Selv om de eksporterende producenter og importører generelt hilste denne udelukkelse velkommen, blev der ikke fremlagt yderligere oplysninger eller bekræftelse på, at virkningen af at indføre foranstaltninger over for børnefodtøj ville være anderledes end for voksenfodtøj.
Even though this exclusion was generally welcomed by exporting producers and importers, in the absence of reaction from any consumer organisation, no further evidence or confirmation was received showing that the effect of imposing measures on children's footwear would be different than the effect it would have on adult footwear.
EF-erhvervsgrenen anfægtede på den anden side udelukkelsen af børnesko fra de midlertidige antidumpingforanstaltninger og henviste til, at der har været en produktion af børnefodtøj i Fællesskabet, og at der er konstateret skadelig dumping for børnefodtøj.
The Community industry, on the other side, challenged the exclusion of children's shoes from the scope of provisional anti-dumping measures and referred to the fact that there has been production of children's footwear in the Community and that injurious dumping has been established for children's footwear.
De endelige konklusioner vedrørende status for børnesko i denne procedure fører til følgende konklusion.
The definitive findings with regard to the status of children's shoes in the present proceeding lead to the following conclusion.
For det første har en videre analyse, der har ført frem til de endelige konklusioner, vist, at børnefodtøj bør medtages i definitionen af den pågældende vare, dvs. at alle typer af den pågældende vare bør betragtes som en og samme vare, og at antidumpingforanstaltningerne derfor i princippet skal indføres for alle typer af den pågældende vare.
Firstly, further analysis that lead to the definitive findings demonstrated that children's footwear should be included in the definition of the product concerned, i.e. that all types of the product concerned should be regarded as forming one single product, and that therefore in principle anti-dumping measures should apply to the totality of the product concerned.