natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Med henblik på at sammenligne den normale værdi med eksportpriserne og til beregningerne af underbud blev der foretaget en hensigtsmæssig justering for forskelle i de fysiske karakteristika i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra a).
For the purposes of comparing normal value with the export prices and for the undercutting/underselling calculations, an appropriate adjustment for differences in the physical characteristics was made in line with Article 2(10)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Andre parter bemærkede store prisforskelle inden for bestemte produktkontrolnumre, hvilket efter deres mening tydede på mangler ved ordningen med produktkontrolnumre.
Other parties observed huge price differences within certain PCNs, which in their view indicated a flaw in the PCN scheme.
Prisforskellene kan skyldes forskellige omstændigheder som markedsfluktuationer, et specifikt prispres i en situation med et stort udbud på markedet osv. samt vilje til at dumpe osv. Det vigtige i forbindelse med anvendelsen af ordningen med produktkontrolnumre er imidlertid, at den anvendes konsekvent for alle de berørte parter.
The price differences could be due to various circumstances like market fluctuations, specific price pressure in case of oversupply etc. and willingness to dump etc. In any event, what matters with regard to the application of the PCN scheme is that is consistently applied for all parties concerned by the case.
Prisforskelle kan skyldes en række forskellige faktorer såsom mode og markedspsykologi, som ikke nødvendigvis hæmmer sammenligneligheden af produkter inden for de samme produktkontrolnumre.
Price differences can be due to a number of factors, such as fashion trends and market psychology, which do not necessarily put into question the comparability of products within the same PCN.
Vigtigere er det, at parterne ikke kunne påvise nogen bedre anvendelig metodologi, der kan lette sammenligneligheden.
More importantly, the parties failed to identify any better and yet practical methodology to facilitate the comparability.
Som allerede bemærket er der taget hensyn til prisforskelle på grund forskellig læderkvalitet i form af hensigtsmæssige justeringer.
As already noted any price differences due to different leather qualities have been taken into account by making appropriate adjustments.
Denne påstand måtte derfor afvises.
The claim had therefore to be rejected.
Andre parter anførte, at eftersom man havde besluttet at udelukke STAF fra definitionen af den pågældende vare, skulle denne type fodtøj have været identificeret separat gennem ordningen med produktkontrolnumre.
Other parties argued that since it was decided to exclude STAF from the scope of the product concerned this footwear type should have been identified separately by the PCN scheme.
Da behovet for at udelukke STAF fra definitionen af den pågældende vare ved denne procedure opstod, anvendte man en rimelig og konsekvent metodologi over for alle eksporterende producenter for at udelukke deres respektive STAF-salg fra undersøgelsen.
When in the present case the need arose to exclude STAF from the product concerned scope, a reasonable and consistent methodology was applied vis-à-vis all exporting producers to exclude their respective STAF sales from the scope of the investigation.
Hensigten om at udelukke STAF fra definitionen af den pågældende vare blev meddelt alle berørte parter længe før offentliggørelsen af de midlertidige konklusioner.
The intention to exclude STAF from the scope of the product concerned was communicated to all parties concerned long before the provisional disclosure took place.
Ingen af de eksporterende producenter har efter denne meddelelse eller efter offentliggørelsen af de midlertidige konklusioner fremlagt reviderede data, der kunne give mulighed for en mere korrekt identificering af den pågældende producents STAF-salg på transaktionslisterne.
Neither after that communication nor upon disclosure of the provisional findings has any exporting producer submitted revised data which would have allowed a better identification of its STAF sales in its transaction listings.
Under disse omstændigheder anses metoden med produktkontrolnumre, som anvendes til at udelukke STAF-salg, for at være rimelig og hensigtsmæssig.
Under these circumstances, the PCN methodology used in order to exclude STAF sales is deemed reasonable and appropriate.
Nogle interesserede parter hævdede, at en manglende sondring mellem samarbejdsvillige og ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder giver de ikke-samarbejdsvillige virksomheder en fordel.
Some interested parties claimed that not distinguishing between cooperating companies and non-cooperating companies gives a bonus for non-cooperation.
Men som forklaret i betragtning 139 i den midlertidige forordning var graden af samarbejdsvilje høj, og dermed blev det i overensstemmelse med normal praksis anset for passende at fastsætte dumpingmargenen for ikke-samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter til niveauet for den vejede gennemsnitlige dumpingmargen, der blev fastsat for de samarbejdsvillige eksporterende producenter i de berørte lande.
However, as explained in recital 139 of the provisional Regulation, the level of cooperation was high and consequently, consistent with standard practice, it was considered appropriate to set the dumping margin for any non-cooperating exporting producers at the level of the weighted average dumping margin established for cooperating exporting producers in the sample in the countries concerned.
I mangel af bemærkninger bekræftes den generelle metode, der blev anvendt til at fastsætte dumpingmargener som beskrevet i betragtning 134-143 i den midlertidige forordning hermed.
In the absence of comments the general methodology used to establish the dumping margins as described in recitals 134 to 143 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Dumpingmargenen for GS er 9,7 % udtrykt som en procentdel af cif-importprisen, Fællesskabets grænse.
the dumping margin for GS is 9,7 %, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community border;
Den endelige landsdækkende dumpingmargen udtrykt som en procentdel af cif-importprisen, Fællesskabets grænse, er 28,9 %.
the definitive country wide dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community border is 28,9 %.
Den endelige landsdækkende dumpingmargen udtrykt som en procentdel af cif-importprisen, Fællesskabets grænse, er 70,1 %.
the definitive country wide dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community border is 70,1 %.
Som i den midlertidige fase og i lyset af ovenstående endelige konklusioner vedrørende produktdefinitionen er alle tal vedrørende STAF ikke en del af de oplysninger, der analyseres nedenfor.
As at the provisional stage, and in view of the above definitive conclusions concerning the product scope, all figures related to STAF have been excluded from the data analysed below.
Efter anmodning fra nogle af de eksporterende producenter bekræftes det hermed, at denne udelukkelse også anvendes for såvel importen fra de berørte lande og fra andre tredjelande som for oplysninger vedrørende Fællesskabets erhvervsgren.
Following the request of certain exporting producers, it is hereby confirmed that such exclusion has been equally applied to both the imports from the countries concerned and those from the other third countries as well as to the data relating to the Community industry.
Men i lyset af ovenstående endelige konklusion om, at børnefodtøj skal medtages i definitionen af den pågældende vare, er den endelige analyse af skaden foretaget for hele den pågældende vare, dvs. inklusive børnesko.
However, given the above definitive conclusion that children's footwear should be included in the scope of the product concerned, the definitive analysis of injury has been made for the totality of the product concerned, i.e. including children's shoes.
EF-PRODUKTION
COMMUNITY PRODUCTION
En sammenslutning af importører gentog sin påstand om, at hvis klagerne, som de påstår kun samler fodtøjskomponenter, der stammer fra lande uden for Fællesskabet, i Fællesskabet, betragtes som EF-producenter, bør importører, der udøver aktiviteter vedrørende design, branding, FoU, ledelse og detailhandel i Fællesskabet, ligeledes betragtes som EF-producenter.
An association of importers reiterated its claim that if the complainants, who they allege merely assemble in the Community footwear components from non-Community sources, are considered being Community producers, then the importers that maintained design, branding, R&D, management and retail activities in the Community should also be considered Community producers.
Denne påstand er allerede behandlet i betragtning 148 i den midlertidige forordning, hvor man konkluderede, at kun virksomheder med produktions-/fremstillingsaktiviteter i Fællesskabet kan betragtes som EF-producenter.
This claim was already addressed in the recital 148 of the provisional Regulation where it was concluded that only the companies active in the production/manufacturing in the Community qualify as Community producers.
De produkter, som importørerne handler med, fremstilles bl.a. i Kina og Vietnam og kan ikke betragtes som havende EF-oprindelse, og disse operatører i Fællesskabet kan derfor ikke betragtes som EF-producenter.
The products traded by the importers are, amongst others, produced in China and Vietnam and do not qualify for EC origin, are subject to import duties, and those operators in the Community therefore cannot be considered Community producers.
I mangel af nye oplysninger bekræftes disse konklusioner hermed, og det konkluderes endeligt, at producenterne, som nævnes i betragtning 146 i den midlertidige forordning, står for den samlede EF-produktion i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 1.
In the absence of new information, those conclusions are hereby confirmed, and it is definitively concluded that the producers mentioned in recital 146 of the provisional Regulation constitute the total Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Definitionen af EF-erhvervsgrenen blev anfægtet af forskellige eksporterende producenter, importører og en sammenslutning af importører med den begrundelse at virksomheder uden for stikprøven ikke samarbejdede ved undersøgelsen, f.eks. ved at besvare spørgeskemaet om stikprøveudtagning, og at de juridiske krav vedrørende klagens status ikke var opfyldt under hele undersøgelsen.
The definition of Community industry was questioned by various exporting producers, importers and an association of importers on the grounds that the non-sampled companies did not cooperate during the investigation, e.g. by providing a reply to the sampling questionnaire and that therefore the legal requirement on standing of the complaint was not fulfilled throughout the investigation.
Af disse grunde påstod de, at de 814 klagere ikke juridisk kunne udgøre EF-erhvervsgrenen.
For those reasons, they alleged that the 814 complainants could not legally constitute the Community industry.
Der blev også henvist til forskellige af Rådets forordninger, hvor klagende producenter, der ikke samarbejder, er blevet udelukket fra definitionen af EF-erhvervsgrenen.
Reference was also made to various Council Regulations whereby complainant producers who failed to cooperate properly were excluded from the definition of the Community industry.
I denne henseende bemærkes det, at i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 1, skal betegnelsen EF-erhvervsgrenen fortolkes som omfattende EF-producenter, hvis samlede produktion af de samme varer udgør en betydelig del som defineret i grundforordningens artikel 5, stk. 4.
In this respect, it should be noted that pursuant to Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation, the term Community industry shall be interpreted as referring to Community producers whose collective output of the like products constitutes a major proportion as defined in Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Artikel 5, stk. 4, indeholder en yderligere definition af denne betydelige del, dvs. at de EF-producenter, der udtrykkelig støtter klagen, skal tegne sig for mindst 25 % af den samlede EF-produktion og mere end 50 % af den samlede produktion af den samme vare, som fremstilles af den gruppe af EF-producenter, der hverken udtrykker støtte til eller modsætter sig undersøgelsen.
Article 5(4) further gives a definition of this major proportion, i.e. that those Community producers expressly supporting the complaint should account for not less than 25 % of the total Community production and more than 50 % of the total production of the like product produced by that portion of Community producers expressing either support for or opposition to the investigation.
I denne sag repræsenterede de klagende EF-producenter mere end 40 % af Fællesskabets produktion, og ifølge ovenstående juridiske krav anses de for at udgøre EF-erhvervsgrenen.
In this specific case, the complainant Community producers represented more than 40 % of the Community production, and according to the above legal requirements, they are deemed to constitute the Community industry.
Desuden har ingen producenter modsat sig klagen.
In addition no producer opposed the complaint.
(156 ) Det er korrekt, at det er normal praksis for institutionerne, at klagende EF-producenter, der ikke har samarbejdet tilfredsstillende i løbet af undersøgelsen, normalt udelukkes fra definitionen af EF-erhvervsgrenen, og at ovennævnte grænser også skal være opfyldt på det tidspunkt, hvor foranstaltningerne vedtages.
It is correct that it is the Institutions usual practice that the complainant Community producers who failed to cooperate satisfactorily during the investigation will normally be excluded from the definition of the Community industry, and that the aforementioned thresholds should also be fulfilled at the time when measures are adopted.
Men i dette tilfælde fandt man, at alle 814 EF-producenter samarbejdede tilfredsstillende ved undersøgelsen.
However, in this case, none of the 814 Community producers was found not to cooperate satisfactorily with the investigation.
Som det klart beskrives i indledningsmeddelelsen, blev der rent faktisk kun udsendt spørgeskemaer til EF-producenterne i stikprøven, og der kom svar tilbage fra alle.
As a matter of fact and as clearly outlined in the notice of initiation, questionnaires were only sent to the sampled Community producers, and replies were received from all of them.
Hvis klagende producenter uden for stikprøven ikke har besvaret spørgeskemaet for producenter i stikprøven, skyldes det ganske enkelt, at de ikke blev bedt om det.
Therefore if the non-sampled complainant producers did not submit any reply to the questionnaire for sampled producers, it is simply explained by the fact that they were not requested to do so.
Det følger af selve stikprøveudtagningens natur, at spørgeskemaer om skade kun udsendes til klagende EF-producenter i stikprøven, og i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i grundforordningens artikel 6, stk. 2, skal kun de parter, der modtager et spørgeskema, indsende svar.
It follows from the very nature of sampling that full injury questionnaires are only sent to the sampled complainant Community producers and, according to the provisions of Article 6(2) of the basic Regulation, only parties receiving a questionnaire should provide a reply.
Påstandene fra de forskellige interesserede parter blev afvist på grundlag af ovenstående, og konklusionerne i betragtning 152 i den midlertidige forordning bekræftes: De 814 klagende EF-producenter, dvs. de stikprøveudvalgte og de øvrige EF-producenter, anses på grundlag af ovenstående at udgøre EF-erhvervsgrenen, jf. grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 1, og artikel 5, stk. 4. De er i det følgende benævnt »EF-erhvervsgrenen«.
The claims made by the various interested parties were rejected on the basis of the above elements, and the conclusions set out in recital 152 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed: the 814 complainant Community producers are deemed to constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation, and they are hereinafter referred to as the ‘Community industry’.
EF-FORBRUGET
COMMUNITY CONSUMPTION
En eksportør anfægtede omfanget af EF-forbruget, idet det tilsyneladende er lavere i Europa end i udviklingslandene.
One exporter questioned the level of the Community consumption, on the basis that it appears to be lower in Europe than in developing countries.
Der blev imidlertid ikke fremlagt yderligere dokumentation for denne påstand, og den afvises hermed.
This claim was however not further substantiated, and thus rejected.
I mangel af andre påstande bekræftes hermed den metode, der anvendes til beregning af EF-forbruget.
In the absence of other claims, the methodology used for the calculation of the Community consumption is hereby confirmed.
Det anslåede EF-forbrug inklusive børnefodtøj udviklede sig som følger:
The apparent Community consumption including children's footwear developed as follows:
Forbrug (i 1000 par)
Consumption (000 pairs)
Denne udvikling er sammenlignelig med det forbrug, som blev beregnet i den midlertidige fase, dvs. eksklusive børnefodtøj.
This development is comparable to the consumption established at provisional stage, i.e. excluding children's footwear.
Nedenstående tabel viser importmængde, markedsandele og gennemsnitlige enhedspriser for begge de berørte lande hver for sig, inklusive børnefodtøj:
The table below shows the import volumes, market shares and average unit prices of both countries concerned individually, including children's footwear:
Importmængde og markedsandele
Import volume and market shares
Kina (i 1000 par)
PRC (000 pairs)
Markedsandele
market shares
Vietnam (i 1000 par)
Vietnam (000 pairs)
Kina EUR/par
PRC EUR/pair
Vietnam EUR/par
Vietnam EUR/pair
Nogle interesserede parter hævdede, at den kumulative vurdering ikke er velbegrundet.
Certain interested parties claimed that the cumulative assessment is not warranted.
Denne påstand er baseret på det forhold, at tendenserne for importmængde og priser er forskellige for Kina og Vietnam.
This allegation is based on the fact that trends in import volume and prices differ between China and Vietnam.
Man hævdede endvidere, at Vietnam er et af verdens fattigste lande og er omfattet af Det generelle toldpræferencesystem (GSP), og at landet derfor ikke bør kumuleres med Kina i forbindelse med vurderingen af skaden.
In addition it was claimed that Vietnam is one of the world's poorest countries, benefiting from the Generalised System of Preference (‘GSP’), and that it should therefore not be cumulated with China for the injury assessment.
Den første påstand er allerede fremført tidligere og behandles i den midlertidige forordning.
The first claim was already made previously and duly addressed in the provisional Regulation.
Mere specifikt vedrørende importtendenser og priser viste tabellen i betragtning 160 i den midlertidige forordning klart, at disse tendenser følger de samme mønstre.
More specifically, concerning import trends in terms of volume and prices, the table in recital 160 of the provisional Regulation clearly indicated that those trends followed similar patterns.
Det bemærkes ligeledes, at medtagelsen af børnefodtøj ikke ændrer ved disse tendenser.
It is also noted that the inclusion of children's footwear does not alter those trends.
Under alle omstændigheder, og ud over disse importtendenser, fremføres der i den midlertidige forordning forskellige årsager til, at den kumulative vurdering er hensigtsmæssig i lyset af konkurrencesituationen mellem importerede varer og de samme EF-varer.
In any event, and in addition to those import trends, the provisional Regulation set out in detail the various reasons why the cumulative assessment is appropriate in the light of the conditions of competition between imported and the like Community product.
Dette skyldes f.eks., at importprodukter er ens med hensyn til deres grundlæggende karakteristika, er substituerbare set fra forbrugerens synspunkt og distribueres via de samme distributionskanaler.
This is for example because imported products are alike in terms of their basic characteristics, interchangeable from the consumer's point of view and distributed via the same distribution channels.
For Vietnams vedkommende findes der ingen bestemmelser i grundforordningen om, at et af de lande, der samtidig er genstand for antidumpingundersøgelser, ikke skal kumuleres på grund af dets overordnede økonomiske situation.
As concerns Vietnam, there is no provision in the basic Regulation stipulating that one of the countries simultaneously subject to anti-dumping investigations should not be cumulated because of its overall economic situation.
En sådan tolkning vil nærmere bestemt heller ikke være i overensstemmelse med formålet med bestemmelserne om kumulering, hvor der fokuseres på, hvorvidt importen fra forskellige kilder konkurrerer med hinanden og med det samme EF-produkt.
More specifically, such an interpretation would also not be in line with the object and purpose of the provisions on cumulation which focus on whether the imports from the various sources compete with each other and the like Community product.
Med andre ord har de handlede produkters karakteristika betydning, men ikke situationen i det land, hvorfra importen kommer.
In other words, the characteristics of the traded products matter but not the situation of the country from which the imports originate.
Situationen i eksportlandet skal behandles i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i artikel 15 i antidumpingaftalen og grundforordningen, men ikke i sammenhæng med kumulering.
The situation of the exporting country has to be addressed in conformity with the provisions of Article 15 of the ADA and the basic Regulation but not in the context of cumulation.
En sammenslutning af importører hævdede ligeledes, at kumuleringen ikke er begrundet, fordi produktmikset for de to lande ikke er ens.
An association of importers also claimed that the cumulation is not warranted on the grounds that the product mix of the two countries concerned is different.
I den forbindelse er holdningen, at selv om der kan være tale om visse forskelle i produktmikset mellem de to lande, er der stadig en høj grad af overlapning, og dermed er holdningen, at den pågældende vare med oprindelse i Kina og i Vietnam overordnet set konkurrerer mod hinanden.
In this respect, it is considered that even though certain differences in product mix may exist between both countries, there is still a significant overlap, and thus it is considered that overall the product concerned originating in China and in Vietnam do overall compete against each other.
Der henvises ligeledes til ovenstående konklusioner om, at alle typer af den pågældende vare bør betragtes som et enkelt produkt i forbindelse med denne procedure, og at alle typer af læderfodtøj, der fremstilles og sælges af EF-erhvervsgrenen, er de samme som dem, der eksporteres fra de berørte lande til Fællesskabet.
Reference is also made to the above conclusions that all types of the product concerned should be considered as one single product for the purpose of this proceeding, and that all types of leather footwear produced and sold by the Community industry are alike to those exported from the countries concerned to the Community.
Derfor blev dette argument afvist.
This argument was therefore rejected.
På grundlag af de midlertidige resultater i betragtning 156-162 i den midlertidige forordning og ovenstående konkluderes det hermed endeligt, at alle betingelser for kumulering som anført i grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 4, er underlagt markedsøkonomisk behandling, og at virkningen af dumpingimporten med oprindelse i de berørte lande derfor bør vurderes samlet i forbindelse med skadesanalysen.
On the basis of the provisional findings set out in recitals 156 to 162 of the provisional Regulation and the above, it is hereby definitively concluded that all conditions of cumulation set out in Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation are met and that accordingly the effect of the dumped imports originating in the countries concerned should be assessed jointly for the purpose of the injury analysis.