natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Af de grunde, der allerede anføres i betragtning 64 i den midlertidige forordning, måtte disse krav imidlertid afvises.
However, for the reasons already stated in recital 64 of the provisional Regulation, these claims were rejected.
En anden eksporterende producent fremsatte en anmodning om individuel behandling efter indførelsen af midlertidige foranstaltninger.
Another exporting producer came forward to request IT after the imposition of provisional measures.
Den pågældende producent har påbegyndt sine aktiviteter efter afslutningen af den oprindelige individuelle behandling.
That producer had started operation after the end of the original IP.
Af de samme grunde som ovenfor var det ikke muligt at foretage en individuel vurdering af det velbegrundede i virksomhedens krav.
For the same reason as aforementioned, an individual assessment of the merits of this company's claim could not be made.
Man fandt i øvrigt, at dens stiftelsesoverenskomst indeholdt en eksportforpligtelse.
Moreover, it was also found that its AoA contained an export obligation.
Den nød desuden godt af skatte- og afgiftslempelser på sin eksport over en vis andel af den samlede omsætning.
In addition, it benefited from tax incentives dependent on its exports exceeding a certain proportion of its total sales.
Under disse omstændigheder ville det under alle omstændigheder ikke have været muligt at indrømme individuel behandling til denne virksomhed.
In these circumstances, it would not have been possible, in any event, to grant IT to this company.
Individuel behandling af eksporterende producenter i Vietnam
IT regarding exporting producers in Vietnam
Efter indførelsen af midlertidige foranstaltninger hævdede seks af de stikprøveudvalgte vietnamesiske eksporterende producenter, at de burde have været indrømmet individuel behandling.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, six of the Vietnamese exporting producers selected in the sample claimed that they should have been granted IT.
Virksomhederne, som ikke blev indrømmet individuel behandling på grundlag af grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 5, litra a), gentog blot deres påstand om, at deres eksportmængder blev fastsat frit.
The companies which were not granted IT on the basis of Article 9(5)(a) of the basic Regulation, merely reiterated their claim that their export quantities are freely determined.
Der erindres om, at deres eksportmængder blev fastsat i virksomhedernes investeringstilladelser og derfor ikke kunne betragtes som værende frit fastsat af virksomhederne, eftersom enhver afvigelse fra den anførte procentdel i deres investeringstilladelse ville kræve en forudgående ændring af denne, hvilket ville skulle godkendes af myndighederne.
It is recalled that their export sales quantities were fixed in the companies investment licenses and could therefore not be considered as freely determined by the companies since any deviation from the ratio stipulated in their investment license would require beforehand a modification of this latter which would need to be approved by the authorities.
Selv om disse eksportører hævdede, at procentdelen fastsættes frit af virksomheden ud fra økonomiske overvejelser, anses der ikke at være nogen begrundelse for at fastsætte en eksportprocent i en investeringstilladelse, hvorved man udtrykkeligt forbyder en virksomhed at sælge en del af sin produktion på hjemmemarkedet.
Although these exporters claimed that the ratio is freely determined by the company on the basis of economic considerations, it is considered that there is no reason for an export ratio to be stipulated in an investment license thereby explicitly forbidding a company from selling part of its production on the domestic market.
Under sådanne omstændigheder kan den pågældende virksomhed ikke længere frit bestemme, hvorvidt den på et givet tidspunkt foretrækker at sælge mere på hjemmemarkedet end den fastsatte mængde i tilladelsen, eftersom dette er underlagt myndighedernes forudgående godkendelse.
In such circumstances, the company concerned is no longer free to decide whether at any time it prefers to sell more on the domestic market than the quantity allowed by its license, since it is subject to a preliminary agreement from the authorities.
En af virksomhederne, som ikke blev indrømmet individuel behandling på grundlag af grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 5, litra c), hævdede, at Kommissionens beslutning om at afvise individuel behandling ikke var tilstrækkeligt begrundet.
One of the companies which was not granted IT on the basis of Article 9(5)(c) of the basic Regulation claimed that the Commission Decision to reject IT was not sufficiently substantiated.
Men den pågældende virksomhed er en 100 % statsejet virksomhed, og dermed tilhører størstedelen af aktierne ikke privatpersoner, men staten, som også udnævner ledelsen.
However, this company is a 100 % State-owned company and consequently the majority of shares do not belong to private persons but to the State which also nominates the management.
Desuden fandt man, at denne virksomhed var tilknyttet en virksomhed, der ikke opfylder kravene vedrørende hverken markedsøkonomisk behandling eller individuel behandling.
In addition, this company was found to be related to a company which did not fulfil the requirements for MET nor IT.
Eftersom der skulle anvendes forskellige toldsatser for disse to sammenhørende virksomheder, vil der opstå risiko for at omgå foranstaltningerne, og i lyset af den normale praksis med at undersøge, hvorvidt en gruppe af forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomheder som helhed opfylder betingelserne for markedsøkonomisk behandling eller individuel behandling, kunne man derfor ikke fastslå, hvorvidt gruppen som helhed opfylder alle betingelser for individuel behandling.
Given that if different duty rates were to be applied to these two related companies there would be a risk of circumvention of measures and given the consistent practice to examine whether a group of related companies as a whole fulfils the conditions for MET or IT, it could therefore not be established that the group as a whole fulfils all the conditions for IT.
Under disse omstændigheder bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 97 i den midlertidige forordning.
Under these circumstances, the conclusions drawn in recital 97 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
De to sidste virksomheder fremlagde ikke nye oplysninger.
The two last companies did not provide any new evidence.
Af samme grund som angives i betragtning 97 i den midlertidige forordning besluttede man derfor, at beslutningen om at afvise individuel behandling hvad angår de otte vietnamesiske virksomheder skulle fastholdes.
Consequently, for the same reason as those explained in the recital 97 of the provisional Regulation, it was considered that the decision to reject IT to the eight Vietnamese companies should be maintained.
For så vidt angår krav om individuel behandling af eksporterende producenter, der ikke er en del af stikprøven, henvises der til det relevante afsnit ovenfor.
As regards IT claims by exporting producers not part of the sample, reference is made to the relevant paragraph above.
Fastsættelse af den normale værdi for eksporterende producenter, der er indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling
Determination of the normal value for the exporting producer granted MET
Fastsættelsen af den normale værdi for den ene eksporterende producent, der blev indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling, skal baseres på de fremsendte oplysninger om indenlandsk salg og produktionsomkostninger.
The normal value determination for the sole exporting producer granted MET should be based on the data it submitted on domestic sales and cost of production.
Disse oplysninger blev kontrolleret hos den pågældende virksomhed.
These data were verified at the premises of the company concerned.
Hvad angår fastsættelsen af den normale værdi, fandt Kommissionen først, at den pågældende eksporterende producent ikke havde noget indenlandsk salg i undersøgelsesperioden.
As far as the determination of normal value is concerned, the Commission first established, that the exporting producer in question made no domestic sales during the investigation period.
Derfor kunne den normale værdi ikke fastslås på grundlag af den relevante eksporterende producents hjemmemarkedspriser som krævet i grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 1, første afsnit.
Therefore, normal value could not be established on the basis of the relevant exporting producer's domestic prices, as provided by Article 2(1), subparagraph 1, of the basic Regulation.
Derfor måtte man anvende en anden metode.
Accordingly, another method had to be applied.
Med henblik herpå undersøgte man, hvorvidt priserne hos andre sælgere eller producenter i Kina kunne bruges i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 1, andet afsnit.
To that end, it was checked whether the prices of other sellers or producers in the PRC could be used pursuant to Article 2(1), subparagraph 2, of the basic Regulation.
Men ingen andre eksporterende producenter i Kina var blevet indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling.
However, no other exporting producer in the PRC had been awarded MET.
Derfor var det ikke muligt at anvende hjemmemarkedspriser fra sådanne eksporterende producenter.
Therefore, the use of domestic prices of such exporting producers was not possible.
Eftersom der ikke kunne anvendes hjemmemarkedspriser til at fastsætte en normal værdi, måtte man beregne en konstrueret normal værdi på grundlag af omkostningerne hos den pågældende producent.
Given that no domestic prices could be used to establish normal value, a constructed normal value had to be calculated based on the costs of the producer in question.
Dermed konstruerede man i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 3, en normal værdi ved at tillægge fremstillingsomkostningerne ved den eksporterede skomodel, tilpasset, hvor det var nødvendigt, et rimeligt beløb til salg, generelle og administrative omkostninger og en rimelig overskudsmargen.
Consequently, in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed by adding to the manufacturing costs of the exported shoe model, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative (‘SG&A’) expenses and a reasonable margin of profit.
Eftersom den eksporterende producent med markedsøkonomisk behandling ikke havde noget indenlandsk salg, og eftersom ingen andre eksporterende producenter i Kina var indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling, måtte de generelle og administrative omkostninger og overskuddet fastlægges på grundlag af en anden hensigtsmæssig metode i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 6, litra c).
Since the exporting producer with MET did not perform any domestic sales and since no other Chinese exporting producer had been awarded MET, SG&A and profit had to be determined on the basis of any other reasonable method pursuant to Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Derfor anvendte Kommissionen satser for generalomkostninger og administrationsomkostning og overskud fra kinesiske eksporterende producenter, som for nylig var blevet indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling i andre undersøgelser, og som havde salg på hjemmemarkedet i forbindelse med deres normale aktiviteter som anført i grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 2.
Consequently, the Commission used SG&A and profit rates from Chinese exporting producers that recently obtained MET in other investigations and which had domestic sales in the ordinary course of trade as stipulated by Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
De gennemsnitlige satser for generalomkostninger og administrationsomkostning og overskud, som man fandt frem til ved disse undersøgelser, blev lagt til den pågældende eksporterende producents produktionsomkostninger til de eksporterede modeller.
The SG&A and profit average rates found in these investigations were compounded on the cost of manufacturing incurred by the exporting producer in question with regard to the exported models.
Fastsættelse af den normale værdi i et referenceland
Determination of the normal value established in the analogue country
Nogle parter fremførte, at det ikke var hensigtsmæssigt at vælge Brasilien som referenceland udelukkende på grundlag af repræsentativiteten af salget på hjemmemarkedet i dette land sammenlignet med andre foreslåede referencelande.
Some parties argued that it was not appropriate to have chosen Brazil as analogue country allegedly as the sole or main reason on the basis of the representativeness of the domestic sales, in this country compared to alternatively suggested analogue countries.
For det første skal det understreges, at repræsentativiteten af salget på hjemmemarkedet ikke er den eneste grund til valget af Brasilien.
First, it should be stressed that the representativeness of the domestic sales is not the sole reason for having chosen Brazil.
Der erindres om, at andre faktorer såsom konkurrencen på det brasilianske marked, forskellen i strukturerne for produktionsomkostninger, herunder adgangen til råmaterialer og de brasilianske producenters knowhow, blev analyseret i betragtning 109-123 i den midlertidige forordning og førte frem til samme konklusion.
It is recalled that other factors such as the competition on the Brazilian market, the difference in the costs of production structures including the access to raw materials and the know-how of the Brazilian producers were analysed in the recitals 109 to 123 of the provisional Regulation and led to the same conclusion.
Valget af Brasilien blev i øvrigt betragtet som endnu mere hensigtsmæssigt i lyset af beslutningen om at udelukke STAF fra de undersøgte varer, eftersom brasilianske virksomheder i modsætning til ovennævnte parter stort set ikke fremstiller STAF.
Incidentally, the choice of Brazil was found to be even more appropriate given the decision to exclude STAF from the product scope, since contrary to the other countries proposed by the above mentioned parties, the Brazilian companies hardly produce STAF.
Andre faktorer, som anføres af de interesserede parter, såsom den socioøkonomiske og kulturelle udvikling eller arbejdskraftomkostningerne, blev ikke anset for relevante for vurderingen af, hvorvidt Brasilien var velegnet som referenceland.
As regards other factors invoked by interested parties, such as the socio-economic and cultural developments or the labour costs, they were not deemed relevant for determining whether Brazil is an appropriate analogue country.
Med hensyn til økonomisk udvikling adskiller Brasilien sig ikke i særlig grad fra de andre foreslåede referencelande som Thailand og Indonesien.
Moreover, in terms of economic development Brazil is not very different from other proposed analogue countries such as Thailand and Indonesia.
Valget af Brasilien blev derfor ikke anset for urimeligt.
The choice of Brazil was therefore not deemed unreasonable.
Selv om det forhold, at hjemmemarkedssalget i referencelandet lå under minimumsniveauet på 5 %, ikke nødvendigvis betyder, at landet er uegnet, tyder et tal på under 2 % for hjemmemarkedssalg for de thailandske og indonesiske virksomheder, der blev foreslået af nogle parter, ikke desto mindre på, at disse markeder er mindre repræsentative end Brasilien.
Moreover, although the sole fact that the domestic sales of the analogue country were below the minimum level of 5 % does not necessarily signify that that country would be inappropriate, a figure of less than 2 % for domestic sales in the case of the Thai and the Indonesian companies that were proposed by some parties, nevertheless amounts to an indication that those markets are less representative than that of Brazil.
Desuden var omfanget af salg til hjemmemarkedet, selv om det ikke var den eneste grund til valget af Brasilien, særligt relevant i netop dette tilfælde i lyset af det store antal forskellige sko, der fremstilles i de berørte lande, og som skal sammenlignes med fodtøj fremstillet i det referenceland, der har den største lighed med fodtøj fremstillet i de berørte lande.
In addition, the level of the domestic sales, although not the sole reason for having chosen Brazil, was however particularly relevant in this specific case given the large number of different types of shoes which are produced in the countries concerned and which need to be compared to the footwear produced in the analogue country that most closely resembles the footwear produced in the countries concerned.
Nogle parter hævdede, at Kommissionens brug af meget sammenlignelige produktkontrolnumre til at foretage den midlertidige vurdering ikke ville give en nøjagtig og retfærdig sammenligning af eksportpriser og normale værdier.
Some parties claimed that the use of closely comparable product control numbers (‘PCN’) used by ther Commission to make its preliminary determination would not provide an accurate and fair comparison of export prices with normal values.
Det bemærkes, at alle de produktkontrolnumre, der sælges af eksportlandene, naturligvis ikke kunne findes i Brasilien.
It is noted that obviously not all PCNs sold by the exporting countries could be matched in Brazil.
I disse tilfælde anses det for den mest fornuftige metode at vælge de mest sammenlignelige produktkontrolnumre med henblik på at foretage en retfærdig sammenligning.
In these circumstances, to resort to the most closely resembling PCNs for the purpose of making a fair comparison is deemed the most reasonable approach.
Desuden blev der foretaget justeringer (f.eks. børnesko, læderkvalitet) for at afhjælpe betydelige forskelle mellem sko eksporteret fra eksportlandene og de meget lignende typer, der sælges i Brasilien.
In addition, adjustments (e.g. children's shoes, leather quality) were made to address material differences in features between the shoes exported by the exporting countries and the closely resembling types sold in Brazil.
Disse træk var enten ikke medtaget i ordningen med produktkontrolnumre, da ordningen først blev oprettet, eller ikke fuldt ud medtaget i de tilgængelige data, som de interesserede parter har indsendt.
These features were either not envisaged by the PCN scheme at the early time of its creation or were not fully embodied in the available data submitted by interested parties.
Der erindres endvidere om, at det samlede salg af læderfodtøj fra de samarbejdsvillige brasilianske producenter er højere end det samlede salg fra samarbejdsvillige producenter fra de andre foreslåede referencelande Indonesien, Indien og Thailand.
It is further recalled that all sales of leather footwear by the cooperating Brazilian producers are higher than the total sales of producers willing to cooperate from the proposed other analogue countries of Indonesia, India and Thailand.
Derfor fandt man, at det antal produkter, der fremstilles af de brasilianske virksomheder, sandsynligvis ville være højere end antallet af produkter fremstillet i de andre lande.
It was therefore considered that the range of the products manufactured by the Brazilian companies was likely to be larger than those manufactured in the other countries considered.
Derfor vurderede man, at sandsynligheden for at finde brasilianske skotyper, der var sammenlignelige med kinesisk/vietnamesiske skotyper, var større.
Consequently, the likelihood of finding Brazilian shoe types comparable with Chinese/Vietnamese shoe types was deemed to be more likely.
De seks thailandske virksomheder, de to indonesiske virksomheder og den indiske virksomhed rapporterede hver især på et samlet salg (dvs. på hjemmemarkedet og til eksport) på mindre end 8 mio. par sko (dvs. mindre end 5 % af den pågældende eksport), mens de otte samarbejdsvillige brasilianske virksomheder rapporterede om et salg på mere end 40 mio. par sko, hvoraf mere end 18 mio. par kom fra de tre virksomheder, hvis oplysninger er blevet anvendt.
Indeed the six Thai companies, the two Indonesian companies and the Indian company respectively reported total sales (i.e. domestic and exports) of less than 8 million pairs (i.e. less than 5 % of the exports concerned) while the eight Brazilian companies which cooperated reported total sales of more than 40 million pairs, from which more than 18 million pairs for the sole three companies whose data were used.
Under disse omstændigheder er det klart, at sandsynligheden for at finde modeller fremstillet af brasilianske virksomheder, der er sammenlignelige med modellerne, der sælges af de berørte lande, er større end for virksomhederne i Thailand, Indien eller Indonesien.
Under these circumstances, it is obvious that the likelihood of finding models produced by the Brazilian companies comparable to the models sold by the countries concerned is higher than with the Thai, Indian or Indonesian companies.
En part fremførte, at den brasilianske produktion ikke er så bred og diversificeret som produktionen i de berørte lande.
One party argued that the range of the Brazilian production is not as wide and diversified as the production of the countries concerned.
Men i lyset af ovenstående kan man med rimelighed gå ud fra, at produktsortimentet hos de brasilianske virksomheder, der fremlagde de nødvendige oplysninger, og hvis salg (på hjemmemarkedet og til eksport) var mellem 6 og 13 gange større end salget fra de indiske, indonesiske og thailandske virksomheder, er bredt og diversificeret.
However, in view of the above, it can be reasonably assumed that the product range of the Brazilian companies which provided the necessary information and whose sales (domestic and export) were found to be 6 to 13 times larger than those reported by the Indian, Indonesian or Thai companies, is wide and diversified.
De interesserede parter henviste ligeledes til en påstået diskrepans mellem betragtning 108 i den midlertidige forordning, hvori det hedder, at »Brasilien forekom således på grundlag af ovenstående at være det mest egnede land på grund af hjemmemarkedssalgets repræsentativitet, der gjorde det muligt at undgå en beregning af den normale værdi og eventuelle talrige justeringer« og betragtning 123 i den midlertidige forordning, hvori man konkluderede, at kvalitetsforskellen på det læder, der anvendes af virksomhederne i stikprøven og de brasilianske producenter »ikke [er] nogen grund til at afvise Brasilien som et egnet referenceland, eftersom der kan foretages en justering for en forskel i fysiske karakteristika for at tage hensyn til en eventuel forskel i læderets kvalitet«.
Interested parties also referred to an alleged contradiction between recital 108 of the provisional Regulation which stated that ‘Brazil appeared to be the most reasonable choice in view of the representativeness of its domestic sales which permitted to avoid construction of the normal value and possible numerous adjustments’ and recital 123 of the provisional Regulation which concluded that the difference in the quality of the leather used by the companies selected in the sample and the Brazilian producers ‘is not a reason to reject Brazil as a suitable analogue country as an adjustment for a difference in physical characteristics can be made to take into account any difference in the quality of the leather’.
Der er imidlertid ikke tale om noget modsætningsforhold, idet det i betragtning 108 i den midlertidige forordning blot hedder, at valget af Brasilien er mere hensigtsmæssigt, fordi der er behov for færre justeringer end for andre potentielle referencelande.
However, there is no contradiction since recital 108 of the provisional Regulation only states that the choice of Brazil is more suitable because fewer adjustments will be required than for other potential analogue countries.
Desuden er det naturligvis ikke muligt på et tidligt tidspunkt af undersøgelsen at vide, hvilke justeringer der bliver behov for hen ad vejen for at kunne foretage en hensigtsmæssig sammenligning.
Furthermore, it is obviously not possible at an early stage of the investigation to know exactly which adjustments will eventually be required in order to make an appropriate comparison.
Sådanne justeringer vil formentlig også have været nødvendige, hvis man havde valgt et andet land som referenceland.
Similarly, such adjustments would probably also have been necessary, had another country been chosen as an analogue country.