natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For det andet foretog man en ny vurdering af argumenterne for midlertidigt at udelukke børnesko fra foranstaltningernes dækningsområde under henvisning til Fællesskabets interesser som anført i betragtning 250-252 i den midlertidige forordning, dvs. betydeligt hyppigere udskiftning af børnesko og dermed større økonomiske konsekvenser af antidumpingforanstaltningerne på den gennemsnitlige europæiske families økonomi.
Secondly, the arguments to provisionally exclude children's shoes from the scope of measures on the grounds of Community interest as set out in recitals 250 to 252 of the provisional Regulation, i.e. notably more frequent replacement of children's shoes and, thus, a higher financial impact of anti-dumping measures on the financial situation of an average European family, were reassessed.
I denne henseende blev det fastslået, at importpriserne på børnesko ifølge Eurostats statistikker i gennemsnit er betydeligt lavere end importpriserne på voksensko (over 33 %).
In this respect, it was established that on average children's shoes import prices are according to Eurostat statistics in general substantially lower than adults' shoes import prices (more than 33 %).
Derfor vil virkningerne af en værditold på børnesko være forholdsmæssigt lavere.
Consequently, the impact of an ad valorem anti-dumping duty on children's shoes would be proportionally lower.
Desuden fører de endelige konklusioner generelt til lavere endelige toldsatser end de midlertidige foranstaltninger.
In addition, the definitive findings lead overall to lower definitive duty levels than the measures at provisional stage.
Dette fører igen til, at foranstaltningerne har en ringere økonomisk indvirkning.
This, again, results in a lower financial impact of measures.
Som allerede beskrevet i betragtning 249 i den midlertidige forordning, anses det desuden for usandsynligt, at forbrugerne kommer til at bære hele byrden af eventuelle foranstaltninger.
Moreover, as already set out in recital 249 of the provisional Regulation it is not considered likely that consumers would bear the full brunt of any measures.
Ingen af de interesserede parter har fremlagt dokumenterede beviser til støtte for et anderledes synspunkt.
No interested party has provided any substantiated evidence which could support a different view.
I denne forbindelse bemærkes det, at forbrugerorganisationerne slet ikke har fremsat bemærkninger, hvilket tyder på, at foranstaltningernes virkninger — uanset om der er tale om børne- eller voksenfodtøj — rent faktisk ikke udgør et reelt problem for deres medlemmer.
In this context, it is duly noted that consumers' organisations did not comment at all, which suggests that the impact of measures — regardless whether it concerns children's or adults' footwear — are effectively not a real concern for the interests of their constituency.
Med udgangspunkt i ovenstående analyse er det klart, at det ikke er begrundet at undtage børnesko fra de endelige foranstaltninger.
Taking account of the above analysis, it is evident that the definitive exclusion of children's shoes from measures could not be warranted.
Dermed findes der ingen endelige beviser for, at forbrugernes interesser er større end EF-erhvervsgrenens interesser i spørgsmålet om indførelse af endelige foranstaltninger til afskaffelse af væsentlig skade forårsaget af dumping.
As a result there is no compelling evidence to prove, when addressing the imposition of definitive measures which remove materially injury caused by dumping practices, that consumer's interests outweigh the interests of the Community industry.
Derfor godtages denne påstand, og det bekræftes hermed, at i lyset af ovenstående vil indførelsen af endelige foranstaltninger over for den pågældende vare, inklusive børnefodtøj, ikke stride mod forbrugernes overordnede interesser.
For those reasons, the claim was accepted and it is hereby confirmed that, given the above, the imposition of definitive measures on the product concerned, including children's footwear, would not be against the overall interest of consumers.
Der erindres om, at der i den midlertidige fase kun indkom et begrænset antal bemærkninger fra distributører/detailhandlende eller organisationer for distributører/detailhandlende: Der indkom en bemærkning fra et konsortium af detailhandlende i en medlemsstat, og der indkom spørgeskemasvar fra tre importører, som også har deres eget distributionsnetværk, inklusive to supermarkedskæder.
It is recalled that at provisional stage, only a limited number of representations were received from distributors/retailers or organisations of distributors/retailers: one submission was received from a consortium of retailers from one Member State, and questionnaire replies were received from three importers who also have their own distribution network, including two supermarket chains.
Kun en af de fire parter fremlagde bemærkninger efter indførelsen af midlertidige foranstaltninger, og ingen andre distributører eller detailhandlende indsendte bemærkninger.
Only one of those four parties submitted comments following the imposition of provisional measures, and no additional individual distributor or retailer submitted any comment.
En sammenslutning af importører, der deltog i undersøgelsen fra starten af proceduren, anfægtede konklusionen om, at der kun var indkommet et begrænset antal bemærkninger, idet denne sammenslutning repræsenterer virksomheder, der også er distributører og detailhandlende ud over deres funktion som importører.
An association of importer that did cooperate in the investigation since the beginning of the procedure challenged the conclusion that only a limited number of representations were received, on the grounds that this association represents companies that are also distributors and retailers in addition to their function of importers.
Den hævdede ligeledes, at mindst to af dens medlemmer i to forskellige medlemsstater havde indsendt detaljerede oplysninger til Kommissionen.
It also claimed that at least two of its members, located in two different Member States have supplied detailed information to the Commission.
Kommissionen anerkender, at denne sammenslutning repræsenterer virksomheder, der undertiden også har deres eget distributionsnet, og konklusionen vedrørende antallet af kommentarer bør præciseres i den henseende.
The Commission recognises that this association represents companies that sometimes also have their own distribution network, and the conclusion regarding the number of representations should indeed be nuanced in that respect.
Ikke desto mindre er disse virksomheders primære aktivitet at importere fodtøj.
Nevertheless, the primary function of those companies is to import footwear.
Det centrale er imidlertid, at distributørerne og de detailhandlende ikke har fremlagt præcise og kontrollerbare oplysninger til Kommissionen ud over fra de tre ovennævnte virksomheder, således at der er mulighed for at vurdere deres økonomiske situation, samt hvorvidt de vil blive påvirket økonomisk af eventuelle foranstaltninger.
Essentially, however, no precise and verifiable data, other than provided by the three above mentioned companies, was provided by distributors and retailers to the Commission, in order to assess their economic situation and to what extent they would be financially affected by any measures.
Og det er især på grundlag af sådanne oplysninger, at Kommissionen er i stand til at foretage en detaljeret analyse.
And it is mainly only on the basis of such information that the Commission is in a position to carry out a detailed analysis.
Hvad angår det påståede samarbejde fra to af medlemmernes side, skal det præciseres, at en af disse ikke fremsendte svar på spørgeskemaet inden for fristerne, hvorfor det ikke kunne bruges.
As concerns the alleged cooperation of its two members, is should be clarified that one of them failed to provide a questionnaire reply within the deadlines, and could therefore not be used.
I sit bidrag fremlagde sammenslutningen tal og eksempler, der viste konsekvenserne af indførelsen af foranstaltninger på importører, der også driver detailhandel.
In its submission, the association provided figures and examples showing what would be the impact of the measures on importers that also have retail activities.
Disse tal blev imidlertid fremsendt langt efter fristerne for indsendelse af sådanne oplysninger og vedrører tilsyneladende kun en enkelt virksomhed — hvis navn ikke nævnes — som tilsyneladende ikke har medvirket i undersøgelsen.
Those figures were however made available far beyond the granted deadlines to provide such data, and seems to refer to only one company — the name of which is not mentioned — which did apparently not cooperate to the investigation.
Disse tal, som ikke kunne kontrolleres, kunne derfor ikke tages i betragtning.
Those figures, that could therefore not be validated, could therefore not be considered.
Sammenslutningen hævder endvidere, at importører med detailhandelsaktiviteter som følge af deres økonomiske situation ikke vil være i stand til, ikke en gang delvis, at skubbe prisstigninger over på forbrugerne, og at nogle detailhandlende, navnlig dem, der udelukkende fører produkter fra de berørte lande, ikke ville overleve indførelsen af foranstaltninger.
The association further claims that due to their financial situation, importers with retail activities will not be in a position to pass on, even partially, any price increase to consumers, and that some retailers, especially those exclusively sourcing from the countries concerned, would not survive the imposition of measures.
Argumentet om, at virksomheder ikke vil være i stand til at skubbe i det mindste en del af omkostningsstigningerne over på forbrugerne er i klar modstrid med påstande fra forskellige parter, herunder kommentarerne fra sammenslutningen af importører, om, at forbrugerpriserne vil stige som følge af indførelsen af antidumpingforanstaltninger.
The argument that companies would not be in a position to pass on, at least, partially any cost increase to consumers clearly conflicts with the claims made by various parties, including the submission made by the association of importers, that consumer prices will increase as a result of the imposition of anti-dumping measures.
På grundlag af oplysninger indsamlet ved undersøgelsen og som bekræftet af disse modstridende udtalelser, er det meget sandsynligt, at alle følger af foranstaltningerne på importprisen i gennemsnit i det mindste delvis vil blive skubbet over på forbrugerne.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation, and as confirmed by those contradictory statements, it is very likely that, on average, any impact of measures on the import price would at least be partially passed on to consumers.
Det kan naturligvis ikke udelukkes, at nogle detailhandlende, der udelukkende importerer direkte fra de berørte lande, ville blive påvirket negativt af eventuelle foranstaltninger.
It can naturally not be excluded that certain retailers directly and exclusively importing from the countries concerned would indeed be negatively affected by any measures.
Der erindres imidlertid om, at analysen af Fællesskabets interesser foretages på et overordnet grundlag, dvs. baseret på den gennemsnitlige situation for de parter i Fællesskabet, der er berørt af proceduren, og man kan derfor aldrig udelukke, at enkelte parter vil blive påvirket anderledes end flertallet.
It should however be recalled that the Community interest analysis is made on an overall basis, i.e. based on the average situation of the parties in the Community concerned by the proceeding, and it can therefore never be excluded that some individual parties will be indeed be affected differently than the majority.
I denne forbindelse henvises der til betragtning 275 i den midlertidige forordning, hvor det erkendes, at foranstaltningerne kan få negative virkninger på visse importørers økonomiske situation.
In this respect, reference is made to the recital 275 of the provisional Regulation, where it was recognised that measures may indeed have a possible negative effect on the financial situation of certain importers.
Endelig hævdede sammenslutningen, at Kommissionen har en fejlagtig opfattelse af forskellene mellem detailhandelskanaler.
Finally, the association claimed that the Commission is mistaken in its understanding of the differences between retail channels.
I denne forbindelse hævdede man, at uafhængige detailhandlende ikke blot modtager leverancer fra grossister i Fællesskabet, men undertiden også importerer selv.
In this respect, it claimed that independent retailers are supplied not only by wholesalers in the Community, but also sometimes import themselves.
Man hævdede, at de detailhandlende i Kommissionens stikprøve alle var detailforhandlere af mærkevarer, og at Kommissionens analyse derfor ikke var hensigtsmæssig.
It claimed that retailers in the, Commission sample were all brand retailers and that therefore the Commission's analysis was not appropriate.
I mangel af detaljerede oplysninger vedrørende de detailhandlendes og distributørernes økonomiske situation foretog Kommissionen en generel analyse af sektoren.
In the absence of detailed information concerning the financial situation of retailers and distributors, the Commission carried out an overall analysis of the sector.
Formålet med denne analyse var blot at identificere de vigtigste distributionskanaler og strukturen for disse distributører og detailhandlende med henblik på at undersøge, hvordan de vil blive påvirket af foranstaltningerne.
The purpose of this analysis was merely to identify the main distribution channels, the structure of those distributors and retailers, in order to examine how they would be affected by measures.
Det kan ikke udelukkes, at den specifikke situation for de individuelle distributører ikke afspejles præcist i denne generelle analyse.
It can not be excluded that the specific situation of individual distributors is not exactly reflected in this overall analysis.
Til oplysning bemærkes det ligeledes, at beskrivelsen og konklusionerne inden for rammerne af undersøgelsen også svarer til konklusionerne af Kommissionens tidligere antidumpingundersøgelse af fodtøj [6], og der er ingen tegn på, at situationen inden for sektoren for distribution af fodtøj har ændret sig siden da.
For information, it is also noted that the description and conclusions drawn within the framework of this investigation also correspond to the findings of the Commission's previous anti-dumping investigation on footwear [6], and no indications were given that the situation of the footwear distribution sector changed since then.
Mere specifikt siges det i den midlertidige forordning i betragtning 260, at uafhængige detailhandlende normalt får deres leverancer fra grossister i Fællesskabet.
More specifically, the provisional Regulation stated in its recital 260 that independent retailers are usually supplied by wholesalers in the Community.
På grundlag heraf udelukkes det således ikke, at disse detailhandlende også har andre leverandører.
From this, it was therefore not excluded that those retailers also have other sources of supply.
Hvad angår påstanden om detailhandlende af mærkevarer har Kommissionen ikke anvendt en stikprøve, men har i stedet analyseret alle de oplysninger, der blev stillet til rådighed af de samarbejdsvillige parter.
As concerns the allegation on brand retailers, the Commission did not make use of any sample, but instead analysed all the information that was made available by cooperating parties.
I den henseende skal det bemærkes, at der i den midlertidige forordning henvises til manglende samarbejdsvilje fra detailhandelskæder med mærkevarer, dvs. detailhandelskæder med et varemærke, hvilket er noget andet end detailforhandlere af mærkevarefodtøj, hvoraf en rent faktisk var samarbejdsvillig.
In this respect, it should be noted that reference was made in the provisional Regulation to the absence of cooperation by branded retail chain, i.e. retail chains with a brand name, which is different from retailers of branded footwear, of which indeed one cooperated.
Der blev ikke fremført yderligere påstande, der kan ændre konklusionerne i den midlertidige forordning.
No further claims was made that would alter the conclusions of the provisional Regulation.
Konklusionen om, at virkningerne af de endelige foranstaltninger på importører og distributører sandsynligvis vil være begrænset som beskrevet i betragtning 264 i den midlertidige forordning, bekræftes hermed.
The conclusion that the impact of the definitive measures on the importers and distributors is likely to remain limited, as set out in recital 264 of the provisional Regulation, is therefore confirmed.
Bemærkningerne fra de forskellige interesserede parter er blevet analyseret omhyggeligt i det omfang, de er tilstrækkeligt dokumenteret, og behandles nedenfor.
The comments received by the various interested parties have been carefully analysed to the extent they were duly substantiated, and have been addressed below.
Nogle importører hævdede, at i lyset af deres fortjenstmargen, som er mindre end niveauet af antidumpingtolden, ville de være ude af stand til at overleve antidumpingtolden, medmindre de kan dele denne supplerende byrde med grossister og detailhandlende.
Certain importers claimed that given their profit margin, which is less than the level of the anti-dumping duty, they would be unable to survive anti-dumping duties, unless they are able to share that additional burden with wholesalers and retailers.
Man hævdede endvidere, at dette ikke ville være muligt, fordi grossister og detailhandlende ikke ville acceptere prisstigninger, men snarere skifte til leverandører, der kan levere uden antidumpingtold.
It is further claimed that this would not be possible because wholesalers and retailers would not accept any price increase, but rather switch to suppliers that can deliver without anti-dumping duties.
Det forhold, at fortjenstmargenen er lavere end antidumpingtolden er ikke relevant.
The fact that the profit margin is lower than the level of the anti-dumping duty is not relevant.
Mens niveauet af antidumpingforanstaltningerne udtrykkes som en procentdel af importprisen, udtrykkes fortjenstmargenen som en procentdel af omsætningen, dvs. salgsprisen.
Indeed, while the level of the anti-dumping measures is expressed as a percentage of the import price, the profit margin is expressed as a percentage of the turnover, i.e. the selling price.
I lyset af de betydelige avancer, der pålægges mellem indkøb og videresalg, er det klart, at de to procentsatser ganske enkelt ikke kan sammenlignes.
In view of the significant margins applied between purchase and resales, it is evident that the two percentages simply cannot be compared.
Med hensyn til påstanden om, at grossister og detailhandlende ikke vil acceptere nogen prisforhøjelser, understreges det igen, at dette strider mod påstanden fra mange importører om, at hele prisstigningen vil blive skubbet over på forbrugerne, dermed også distributørerne, og den kan derfor ikke godtages.
Concerning the claim that wholesalers and retailers would not accept any price increase, it is again stressed that this is conflicting with the claim by many importers that price increases will be passed on fully to the consumers, thus also distributors, and could therefore not be accepted.
Under alle omstændigheder er det korrekt, at grossister og detailhandlende kan skifte til leverandører, der kan levere uden antidumpingtold, inklusive EF-erhvervsgrenen, der således vil få gavn af foranstaltningerne.
In any event, it is indeed true that wholesalers and retailers may indeed switch to suppliers than can deliver without anti-dumping duties, including the Community industry that would thus benefit from measures.
En sammenslutning af importører anfægtede Kommissionens beskrivelse af de to kategorier af importører og hævdede, at det ikke afspejler situationen på markedet, og at det er produktmikset og salgskanalerne, der er relevante for sondringen mellem importørerne.
An association of importers contested the Commission's description of the two categories of importers, submitting that it does not reflect the market reality and that it is the product-mix, sales channels that are relevant for differentiating importers.
Det hævdes endvidere, at det er nettomargenen og ikke avancen, der er relevant ved vurderingen af foranstaltningernes indvirkning.
It further claimed that it is the net margin, and not the mark-up that is relevant when assessing the effect of measures.
I den henseende skal det bemærkes, at der ikke foregik nogen stikprøveudtagning, at importørernes samarbejdsvilje var betydelig, og at Kommissionen derfor var i stand til at udlede sin konklusion på et meget detaljeret og faktuelt grundlag.
In this respect it should be noted that no sampling was applied, that cooperation from importers was significant and that therefore the Commission was in a position to draw its conclusion on a very detailed factual basis.
Det erkendes, at produktmikset og salgskanalerne rent faktisk er relevante for kategoriseringen af importørerne.
It is conceded that product-mix and sales channels are indeed relevant for the categorisation of importers.
I den henseende blev der også taget behørigt hensyn til disse oplysninger ved analysen.
In this respect those elements were also duly taken into consideration in the analysis.
Rent faktisk skelnede Kommissionen mellem virksomheder, der var aktive i højprissegmentet, og importører, der var aktive i lavprissegmentet, og konstaterede rent faktisk, at disse to kategorier af importører har forskellige produktmiks og salgskanaler.
As a matter of fact, the Commission differentiated between companies active in the high end of the market and the importers active in the lower end of the market, and indeed considered that those two categories of importers have different product mix and sales channels.
Desuden var ingen af bemærkningerne fra sammenslutningen af importører af en sådan karakter, at det ændrer konklusionerne om, at en værditold vil have en begrænset indvirkning på importører i højprissegmentet sammenlignet med den langt højere salgspris (og dermed overskud), og at værditolden for lavprissegmentet blot ville resultere i en begrænset absolut prisstigning, og at de i lyset af deres gennemsnitlige fortjenstmargen ikke vil blive påvirket af foranstaltningerne i væsentlig grad.
Furthermore, none of the comments given by the association of importers was such as to alter the conclusions that in the case of the importers active on the higher end of the market any ad valorem duty has a moderate impact as compared to the much higher selling price (thus profit), and that for those active on the lower end of the market the ad valorem duty would result only in a moderate absolute price increase and that given the level of their average margin of profit they would not be significantly affected by measures.
Konklusionerne i betragtning 265-275 i den midlertidige forordning bekræftes hermed.
The conclusions set out in the recitals 265 to 275 of the provisional Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Det bekræftes derfor endeligt, at indførelsen af foranstaltninger sandsynligvis ikke vil have nogen betydelig negativ indvirkning på situationen for importører i Fællesskabet i almindelighed, men også at indførelsen af foranstaltninger ikke desto mindre kan have nogle negative virkninger for visse individuelle importørers økonomiske situation.
It is therefore definitively confirmed that the imposition of measures is unlikely to have a significant negative impact on the situation of the importers in the Community in general, but also that such imposition may nevertheless have some negative effects on the financial situation of certain individual importers.
Samlet set ventes disse negative virkninger imidlertid ikke at have nogen betydelig indvirkning på importørernes samlede økonomiske situation.
On balance, however, those negative effects are not expected to have a significant impact on the overall financial situation of the importers.