natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Denne bruger fremførte, at de pågældende producenter burde have vidst, at sådanne pristilbud ville være uacceptable for enhver potentiel kunde, og hævdede, at EF-erhvervsgrenen gennem sine forbindelser til disse producenter forsætligt afholdt sig fra at sælge varen til visse kunder i Fællesskabet.
This user claimed that the producers concerned should have known that such price offers would be unacceptable for any potential customer and alleged that the Community industry through their links to these producers intentionally refrained to sell the product to certain customers in the Community.
Derfor skyldtes de faldende salgsmængder og markedsandele på EF-markedet denne konkurrencefjendtlige adfærd og ikke dumpingimporten.
Therefore, the decrease in sales volume and market share on the Community market was due to this uncompetitive behaviour rather than the dumped imports.
Det konstateredes, at kun en af de ovennævnte producenter eksporterede den pågældende vare til Fællesskabet i undersøgelsesperioden.
It was found that only one of the abovementioned producers was exporting the product concerned to the Community during the IP.
Argumenterne vedrørende den anden producent blev derfor fundet irrelevante og afvist.
The arguments with regard to the other producer were therefore considered irrelevant and rejected.
For så vidt angår producenten i Kina, eksporterede denne rent faktisk den pågældende vare i undersøgelsesperioden (jf. også betragtning 74).
As far as the producer in the PRC is concerned, it did indeed export the product concerned during the IP (see also recital 74).
Man fandt dog, at de erhvervsmæssige beslutninger blev truffet helt uafhængigt af den pågældende EF-producent, og især var der ikke aftalt en prisstrategi på EF-markedet.
However, it was found that business decisions were taken completely independently from the Community producer concerned and in particular, price strategy in the Community market was not agreed.
Den pågældende bruger fremlagde ingen dokumentation til støtte for sin påstand om, at EF-erhvervsgrenen skulle gøres ansvarlig for erhvervsmæssige beslutninger truffet af dens forretningsmæssigt forbundne producent i Kina.
The user concerned did not submit any evidence to support its claim that the Community industry should be held responsible for business decisions of its related exporting producer in the PRC.
Denne påstand blev på grundlag af de foreliggende oplysninger derfor afvist.
Therefore, on the basis of the information available, this claim was rejected.
Det bør endvidere bemærkes, at den dokumentation vedrørende priser, som denne bruger fremlagde, var rent opspind og ikke kunne verificeres, da den ikke var fremlagt inden for de krævede frister og i en meget sen fase af proceduren.
It should also be noted that the evidence submitted with regard to prices by this user was anecdotal and could not be verified, given that it was submitted outside the deadlines required and at a very late stage of the proceeding.
Under alle omstændigheder var de pristilbud, som blev forelagt, tilbud før forhandling og derfor ikke endelige.
In any case, the price offers shown were offers before negotiation and were therefore not final.
De vedrørte heller ikke undersøgelsesperioden.
They also did not relate to the IP.
Desuden lå EF-erhvervsgrenens faktiske verificerede gennemsnitlige salgspriser en del under ovennævnte tilbud.
Moreover, the actual verified average sales price of the Community industry was well below the levels of the offers shown.
Det noteres også, at i betragtning 117-119 i forordningen om midlertidig told blev det gennemsnitlige underbudsniveau anset for betydeligt.
It is also noted that as in recitals 117 to 119 of the provisional Regulation, average undercutting levels were found to be significant.
Dumpingimporten udløste et prisfald på EF-markedet, og under disse omstændigheder dannes »markedsprisen« på urimelige vilkår og kan ikke nødvendigvis anvendes som benchmark.
The dumped imports caused a price depression on the Community market and under these circumstances the ‘market price’ is built under unfair conditions and cannot necessarily be used as a benchmark.
Dette er under alle omstændigheder irrelevant, fordi dumping er defineret i artikel 1, stk. 2, i grundforordningen, hvor der ikke henvises til »rimelige« eller »markedspriser«.
In any case, this is irrelevant because dumping is defined in Article 1(2) of the basic Regulation, which does not make reference to a ‘reasonable’ or ‘market price’.
Med hensyn til denne eksporterende producents prisniveauer på andre tredjelandsmarkeder var den fremlagte dokumentation rent opspind og kunne heller ikke verificeres.
As far as the price levels of this exporting producer to other third markets are concerned, the evidence submitted in this regard was anecdotal and also could not be verified.
Desuden havde disse priser ingen relation til situationen på EF-markedet og var derfor ikke relevante for årsagssammenhængsanalysen.
In addition, these prices were unrelated to the situation in the Community market and therefore irrelevant in the causality analysis.
Der forelå ingen tilgængelig dokumentation eller information om de forskellige markedsvilkår på disse markeder.
In any case, no evidence or information was available regarding the different market conditions in these markets.
Man fandt, at der på grundlag af den fremlagte dokumentation ikke kunne drages nogen anvendelige konklusioner om sammenligneligheden af priserne på de forskellige markeder.
It was considered that, on the basis of the evidence submitted, no meaningful conclusions could be drawn as to the comparability of the prices charged in the different markets.
Vilkårene for produktion og prisfastsættelse i Kina, hvor en af EF-producenternes forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomheder lå, kan heller ikke nødvendigvis sammenlignes med vilkårene på EF-markedet, som imidlertid kan begrunde forskelle i prisniveauerne.
Likewise, the conditions of production and price setting in the PRC, where the related company of one of the Community producer was located, cannot necessarily be compared to the one in the Community market, which, however, may justify difference in price levels.
En af de eksporterende producenter i USA hævdede derimod, at EF-erhvervsgrenen var ansvarlig for prisfaldet på EF-markedet, da den førte en underbudspolitik i forhold til konkurrenterne på EF-markedet.
In contrast, one of the exporting producers in the USA claimed that the Community industry was responsible for the price depression on the Community market since it pursued a policy of price undercutting with regard to its competitors on the Community market.
Den eksporterende producent underbyggede dette argument ved at give flere eksempler på, hvordan han havde været nødt til at sænke prisen for at komme på niveau med EF-erhvervsgrenens pristilbud.
The exporting producer supported this argument by submitting several examples where it had to lower its price in order to meet the level of the Community industry's price offer.
Den fremlagte dokumentation blev anset for rent opspind, og der kunne ikke drages nogen generelle beslutninger på grundlag heraf.
The evidence submitted was considered anecdotal and no general conclusions could be drawn therefrom.
Som nævnt i betragtning 85 og 89 er der givet andre eksempler på den modsatte situation.
As recitals 85 and 89 show, other examples of the opposite situation have been provided.
Af de tilgængelige oplysninger fremgår det, at konkurrencen på EF-markedet er stor, men det kan ikke konkluderes, at EF-erhvervsgrenen drev priserne ned på EF-markedet, og dette argument måtte derfor afvises.
While it shows that there is high degree of competition on the Community market, on the basis of the information available it could not be concluded that the Community industry was driving down the prices on the Community market and this argument had therefore to be rejected.
Situationen på verdensmarkedet
Situation on the world market
En importør fremførte, at EF-erhvervsgrenens salgsnedgang var en følge af situationen på verdensmarkedet, hvor internationale kunder centraliserede deres indkøbsstrategier.
One importer claimed that the loss of sales of the Community industry is due to the situation in the world market where international customers centralised their purchase strategies.
Denne importør kunne dog ikke vise, hvordan denne ændrede strategi kunne have en indvirkning på EF-erhvervsgrenens forbrug og på årsagssammenhængen mellem dumpingimport og den væsentlige skade, og dette argument måtte derfor afvises.
This importer did, however, not show how this change in strategies could have an impact on the Community industry consumption and on the causal link between the dumped imports and the material injury suffered and this argument had therefore to be rejected.
Stigning i EF-erhvervsgrenens produktionsomkostninger
Increase in costs of production of the Community industry
En kinesisk eksporterende producent hævdede, at det skulle have været undersøgt, om EF-erhvervsgrenens omkostningsstigning kunne have forårsaget den væsentlige skade, som EF-erhvervsgrenen led.
One Chinese exporting producer claimed that it should have been considered whether the cost increase of the Community industry could have caused the material injury suffered by the Community industry.
Udviklingen i enhedsomkostninger i den betragtede periode er ikke anført i grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 5, og tages derfor ikke systematisk i betragtning, når EF-erhvervsgrenens situation skal vurderes.
The development of unit costs during the period considered are not listed in Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation and therefore not systematically mentioned when assessing the situation of the Community industry.
Men som led i analysen af den væsentlige skade bliver salgspriser og rentabilitet systematisk behandlet, hvilket indebærer, at produktionsomkostningerne også tages i betragtning.
However, as part of the analysis of material injury, sales prices and profitability are systematically addressed, which implies that cost of production is also considered.
Som anført i betragtning 125 i forordningen om midlertidig told blev der taget hensyn til enhedsomkostninger i de midlertidige bestemmelser.
In any case, as set out in recital 125 of the provisional Regulation, unit costs were considered in the provisional determinations.
I betragtning 125 i forordningen om midlertidig told forklares det, at EF-erhvervsgrenens enhedsomkostninger steg med 5 % som følge af fald i produktionen, samtidig med at kapaciteten var stabil.
Thus, recital 125 of the provisional Regulation explains that unit costs of the Community industry increased by 5 % due to a decrease in production volume by stable capacities.
Produktionen faldt som følge af faldende salgsmængder og tab af markedsandele, hvilket var en konsekvens af pristrykket fra dumpingimporten.
The production volume decreased due to the loss of sales volume and market share as a consequence of the price pressure from the dumped imports.
Det konkluderedes derfor, at EF-erhvervsgrenens stigende produktionsomkostninger kun havde begrænset (hvis overhovedet nogen) betydning for EF-erhvervsgrenens negative udvikling.
It was therefore concluded that the impact of the increase of production cost of the Community industry on the Community industry's negative developments was, if existent at all, only limited.
Det bekræftes, at den væsentlige skade, som EF-erhvervsgrenen har lidt, jf. betragtning 137 i forordningen om midlertidig told, og som var kendetegnet af en negativ udvikling i alle skadesindikatorer, var forårsaget af den pågældende dumpingimport.
In conclusion, it is confirmed that the material injury of the Community industry, which is as mentioned in recital 137 of the provisional Regulation characterised by a downward trend of all injury indicators, was caused by the dumped imports concerned.
Ikke-dumpingimporten fra andre tredjelande, navnlig fra Tyrkiet, EF-erhvervsgrenens investeringer og andre aktiviteter i Kina, omkostninger i forbindelse med købet af en tredje virksomhed, stigningen i enhedsomkostningerne, EF-erhvervsgrenens påstående mangel på effektivitet og dens konkurrencefjendtlige adfærd samt situationen på verdensmarkedet havde kun begrænset (hvis overhovedet nogen) betydning for EF-erhvervsgrenens negative udvikling.
Indeed, the effect of the non-dumped imports from other third countries, in particular, from Turkey, the Community industry's investments as well as other activities in the PRC, the acquisition cost of a third company, the increase in unit costs, the alleged non-efficiency and uncompetitive behaviour of the Community industry and the situation on the world market, on the Community industry's negative developments was, if existent at all, only limited.
På baggrund af ovenstående analyse, hvor der er gjort behørigt rede for virkningerne af alle kendte faktorer for EF-erhvervsgrenens situation og sondret mellem disse virkninger og dumpingimportens skadevoldende virkninger, bekræftes det, at disse andre faktorer ikke i sig selv ændrer det forhold, at den konstaterede skade må tilskrives dumpingimporten.
Given the above analysis which has properly distinguished and separated the effects of all the known factors on the situation of the Community industry from the injurious effects of the dumped imports, it is hereby confirmed that these other factors as such do not reverse the fact that the injury assessed must be attributed to the dumped imports.
På baggrund af ovenstående konkluderes det, at dumpingimporten af persulfat fra Kina, USA og Taiwan har forvoldt væsentlig skade, jf. grundforordningens artikel 3, stk. 6.
Given the above, it is concluded that the dumped imports of persulphates from the PRC, USA and Taiwan have caused material injury within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
I mangel af andre bemærkninger hertil bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 140-153 i forordningen om midlertidig told hermed.
In the absence of any other comments in this respect, the conclusions in recitals 140 to 153 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
En af brugerne, som ikke besvarede spørgeskemaet, men indsendte kommentarer efter den foreløbige fremlæggelse af oplysninger, hævdede, at EF-erhvervsgrenen var ved at overvinde virkningerne af dumpingimporten, og at priserne på persulfat i Fællesskabet var steget efter undersøgelsesperioden og inden indførelsen af de midlertidige foranstaltninger.
One of the users who did not fill in the questionnaire reply, but submitted comments further to the provisional disclosure, claimed that the Community industry was recovering from the dumped imports and that prices of persulphates in the Community had increased after the IP and prior to the imposition of provisional measures.
Der ville derfor ikke være noget behov for at indføre antidumpingforanstaltninger for at forbedre EF-erhvervsgrenens situation.
Therefore, there would be no need to impose anti-dumping measures to improve the situation of the Community industry.
Denne bruger anfægtede også konklusionerne i betragtning 158 i forordningen om midlertidig told, hvori det hedder, at indførelsen af antidumpingtold ville give EF-erhvervsgrenen mulighed for bl.a. at genvinde markedsandele og derved udnytte fordelene ved stordrift bedre.
This user also contested the conclusions in recital 158 of the provisional Regulation that the imposition of anti-dumping duties would allow the Community industry to, inter alia, regain market share and thereby generate better economies of scale.
Det fremførtes, at undersøgelsesresultaterne vedrørende EF-erhvervsgrenens markedsandele viser, at den er en af de største aktører i og uden for Fællesskabet, og at der derfor ikke var yderligere muligheder for væsentlige stordriftsfordele.
It was claimed that based on the findings of the Community industry's market shares it is one of the largest players in and outside the Community and there would therefore not be any further scope for substantial economies of scale.
Den samme bruger anfægtede EF-erhvervsgrenens planer om at investere i sine produktionsfaciliteter i Fællesskabet og fremførte, at konklusionerne i betragtning 158 i forordningen om midlertidig told var spekulative.
The same user questioned the Community industry's intention to invest in its production facilities in the Community and argued that the conclusions in recital 158 of the provisional Regulation in this respect were speculative.
Den samme bruger hævdede, at virkningerne af antidumpingtold ikke ville genskabe redelige konkurrencevilkår, således som det konkluderes i betragtning 158 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The same user claimed that anti-dumping duties would not result in restoring fair competition as concluded in recital 158 of the provisional Regulation.
Antidumpingforanstaltninger ville snarere styrke EF-erhvervsgrenens allerede dominerende position og dermed mindske konkurrencen på EF-markedet.
Rather, anti-dumping measures would enforce the already dominant position of the Community industry and therefore decrease competition on the Community market.
Med hensyn til argumentet, at EF-erhvervsgrenen allerede var ved at overvinde virkningerne af dumpingimporten, bør det bemærkes, at de oplysninger, som brugeren indsendte, var anekdotiske og vedrørte begivenheder efter undersøgelsesperioden.
As to the argument that the Community industry was already recovering, it should be noted that the information submitted by the user in this respect was anecdotal and related to events after the IP.
De kunne ikke verificeres, da de blev fremlagt i en meget sen fase af proceduren, dvs. efter indførelsen af midlertidige foranstaltninger.
It could not be verified given that it was submitted at a very late stage of the investigation, i.e. after the imposition of provisional measures.
Den fremlagte dokumentation blev derfor anset for utilstrækkelig.
The evidence submitted was therefore considered insufficient.
Det bemærkes, at det ikke er usædvanligt med bevægelser på markedet og navnlig prisstigninger i løbet af en undersøgelsesperiode.
It is noted that movements in the market and in particular price increases during an anti-dumping investigation are not unusual.
Som nævnt nedenfor i betragtning 126 er prisstigninger faktisk en forventet virkning af en antidumpingtold.
Indeed, as mentioned below in recital 126, price increases on the Community market are an expected affect of an anti-dumping duty.
Desuden kan der også have været andre grunde til den påståede prisstigning, f.eks. stigende omkostninger.
Furthermore, the alleged price increase may also have had other reasons such as an increase in cost.
Dette anses ikke i sig selv som en grund til at afholde sig fra indførelsen af endelige foranstaltninger, hvis betingelserne i grundforordningen er opfyldt.
It is not per se considered as a reason to refrain from the imposition of definitive measures, if the conditions of the basic Regulation are fulfilled.
For så vidt angår EF-erhvervsgrenens evne til at udnytte stordriftsfordele, ansås den fremlagte dokumentation heller ikke for tilstrækkelig.
As far as the ability of the Community industry to realise economies of scale is concerned, likewise, the evidence submitted was considered insufficient.
Som bekendt blev det på basis af de verificerede data, som EF-erhvervsgrenen havde indsendt som svar på spørgeskemaet, fastslået, at produktionen faldt, samtidig med at produktionskapaciteten var stabil, og at enhedsomkostningerne derfor steg.
It will be recalled that it was established, on the basis of verified data submitted by the Community industry in their reply to the questionnaire, that the production volume decreased with a stable production capacity and that, as a consequence, unit costs increased.
Ved at øge produktionsmængden er der derfor mulighed for stordriftsfordele i det mindste med henblik på at nå enhedsomkostningsniveauet fra før dumpingimporten.
In view of this, by increasing production volume there is indeed room for economies of scale, at least in order to reach the unit cost level before the dumped imports.
EF-erhvervsgrenens markedsandel i eller uden for Fællesskabet blev anset for irrelevant i denne forbindelse.
The market share of the Community industry inside or outside the Community was considered irrelevant in this context.
Med hensyn til påstandene om, at EF-erhvervsgrenen ikke ville investere i sine produktionsfaciliteter i Fællesskabet, også selv om dens finansielle situation blev forbedret, fremførte brugeren, at dette kan konkluderes ud fra EF-erhvervsgrenens adfærd før indførelsen af endelig antidumpingtold på import af persulfat med oprindelse i Kina i 1995 ved forordning (EF) nr. 2961/95 (jf. betragtning 10).
As far as the allegations are concerned that the Community industry would not invest in its production facilities in the Community, even if its financial situation improved, the user argued that this conclusion can be drawn on the basis of the Community industry's behaviour further to the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of peroxodisulphates originating in the PRC in 1995 by Regulation (EC) No 2961/95 (see recital 10).
Denne bruger hævdede således, at EF-erhvervsgrenen ikke investerede i sine produktionsfaciliteter, selv om der var indført antidumpingforanstaltninger, ellers ville EF-erhvervsgrenen ifølge denne bruger ikke have lidt nogen skade i undersøgelsesperioden.
Thus, this user alleged, the Community industry did not invest in its production facilities even when anti-dumping measures were in place, otherwise, this user claimed further, the Community industry would not have suffered any injury during the IP.
Det bør i den forbindelse bemærkes, at den pågældende bruger ikke fremlagde nogen dokumentation til støtte for disse påstande.
In this regard, it is noted that the user concerned did not submit any evidence to support these allegations.
Han kunne navnlig ikke fremlægge nogen oplysninger, der kunne tyde på manglende investeringer efter indførelsen af endelig antidumpingtold i 1995, eller som viste, at der var en forbindelse mellem denne påståede mangel på investeringer og den skade, der blev forvoldt i den aktuelle undersøgelsesperiode.
In particular, he could not provide any information to indicate a lack of investments after imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties in 1995 or that there was a link between this alleged lack of investments and the injury suffered during the IP of the current investigation.
På den anden side — og som understreget i betragtning 140-153 i forordningen om midlertidig told og bekræftet i betragtning 68-99 — var den væsentlige skade, som var forvoldt EF-erhvervsgrenen, rent faktisk forårsaget af dumpingimporten fra de pågældende lande.
On the other hand, as outlined in the provisional Regulation in recitals 140 to 153 and as confirmed in recitals 68 to 99, the material injury suffered by the Community industry was indeed caused by the dumped imports from the countries concerned.
Navnlig på baggrund af konklusionerne i betragtning 75 og 76 var det ikke urimeligt at antage, at EF-erhvervsgrenen er engageret i EF-markedet, og at den vil fortsætte sine investeringer, hvis situationen på EF-markedet tillader det.
Given in particular the conclusions in recitals 75 and 76, it was not unreasonable to assume that the Community industry is committed to the Community market and that it will continue its investment activities should the situation in the Community market allow to do so.
Ingen af de fremførte argumenter kunne svække disse konklusioner, og påstandene måtte derfor afvises.
None of the arguments brought forward could invalidate these conclusions and the claims in this respect had therefore to be rejected.