natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
MARTITEGUI LIZASO, Jurdan, født den 10. maj 1980 i Durango (Biscaya), identitetskort nr. 45.626.584 - »ETA«-aktivist
MARTITEGUI LIZASO, Jurdan, born 10 May 1980 in Durango (Vizcaya), identity card No 45.626.584 — ‘E.T.A.’ activist
OLANO OLANO, Juan Mariá, født den 25. marts 1955 i Gainza (Guipúzcoa), identitetskort nr. 15.919.168 - »ETA«-aktivist, member of »Gestoras Pro-amnistía«/»Askatasuna«
OLANO OLANO, Juan Mariá, born 25 March 1955 in Gainza (Guipúzcoa), identity card No 15.919.168 — ‘E.T.A.’ activist, member of ‘Gestoras Pro-amnistía’/‘Askatasuna’
OLARRA AGUIRIANO, José María, født den 27. juli 1957 i Tolosa (Guipúzcoa), identitetskort nr. 72.428.996 - »ETA«-aktivist, medlem af »Xaki«
OLARRA AGUIRIANO, José María, born 27 July 1957 in Tolosa (Guipúzcoa), identity card No 72.428.996 — ‘E.T.A.’ activist, member of ‘Xaki’
RETA DE FRUTOS, José Ignacio, født den 3. juli 1959 i Elorrio (Biscaya), identitetskort nr. 72.253.056 - »ETA«-aktivist, medlem af »Gestoras Pro-amnistía«/»Askatasuna«
RETA DE FRUTOS, José Ignacio, born 3 July 1959 in Elorrio (Vizcaya), identity card No 72.253.056 — ‘E.T.A.’ activist, member of ‘Gestoras Pro-amnistía’/‘Askatasuna’
TXAPARTEGI NIEVES, Nekane, født den 8. januar 1973 i Asteasu (Guipúzcoa), identitetskort nr. 44.140.578 - »ETA«-aktivist, medlem af »Xaki«
TXAPARTEGI NIEVES, Nekane, born 8 January 1973 in Asteasu (Guipúzcoa), identity card No 44.140.578 — ‘E.T.A.’ activist, member of ‘Xaki’
URRUTICOECHEA BENGOECHEA, José Antonio, født den 24. december 1950 i Miravalles (Biscaya), identitetskort nr. 14.884.849 - »ETA«-aktivist
URRUTICOECHEA BENGOECHEA, José Antonio, born 24 December 1950 in Miravalles (Vizcaya), identity card No 14.884.849 — ‘E.T.A.’ activist
Rådets rammeafgørelse 2008/675/RIA
Council Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA
om hensyntagen til domme afsagt i medlemsstaterne i Den Europæiske Union i forbindelse med en ny straffesag
on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings
under henvisning til traktaten om Den Europæiske Union, særlig artikel 31 og artikel 34, stk. 2, litra b),
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 31 and 34(2)(b) thereof,
Dette mål forudsætter, at der skal kunne tages hensyn til oplysninger om domme afsagt i medlemsstaterne uden for domslandet for at forhindre nye overtrædelser og i forbindelse med en ny straffesag.
This objective requires that it be possible for information on convictions handed down in the Member States to be taken into account outside the convicting Member State, both in order to prevent new offences and in the course of new criminal proceedings.
Den 29. november 2000 vedtog Rådet i overensstemmelse med konklusionerne fra Det Europæiske Råds møde i Tammerfors et program for foranstaltninger med henblik på gennemførelse af princippet om gensidig anerkendelse af afgørelser i straffesager [2], hvori der foreskrives »Vedtagelse af et eller flere instrumenter, der indfører princippet om, at retten i en medlemsstat skal være i stand til at tage hensyn til endelige afgørelser i straffesager afsagt af en domstol i en anden medlemsstat, med henblik på at vurdere lovovertræderens kriminelle fortid, overveje, om der er tale om gentagelsestilfælde, og fastlægge, hvilken straf der skal pålægges, samt de nærmere vilkår for fuldbyrdelsen«.
On 29 November 2000 the Council, in accordance with the conclusions of the Tampere European Council, adopted the programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters [2], which provides for the ‘adoption of one or more instruments establishing the principle that a court in one Member State must be able to take account of final criminal judgments rendered by the courts in other Member States for the purposes of assessing the offender’s criminal record and establishing whether he has reoffended, and in order to determine the type of sentence applicable and the arrangements for enforcing it’.
Formålet med denne rammeafgørelse er at pålægge medlemsstaterne en minimumsforpligtelse til at tage hensyn til domme afsagt i andre medlemsstater.
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to establish a minimum obligation for Member States to take into account convictions handed down in other Member States.
Denne rammeafgørelse bør således ikke være til hinder for, at medlemsstaterne, når de råder over oplysninger, i overensstemmelse med national ret kan tage hensyn til f.eks. endelige afgørelser truffet af administrative myndigheder, hvis afgørelser kan indbringes for en straffedomstol, hvori en person kendes skyldig i en strafbar handling eller i en handling, der er strafbar i henhold til national ret, fordi den udgør en overtrædelse af retsreglerne.
Thus this Framework Decision should not prevent Member States from taking into account, in accordance with their law and when they have information available, for example, final decisions of administrative authorities whose decisions can be appealed against in the criminal courts establishing guilt of a criminal offence or an act punishable under national law by virtue of being an infringement of the rules of law.
Nogle medlemsstater tillægger domme afsagt i andre medlemsstater retsvirkninger, mens andre kun tager hensyn til nationale domme.
Some Member States attach effects to convictions handed down in other Member States, whereas others take account only of convictions handed down by their own courts.
Det bør fastslås som et princip, at medlemsstaterne bør tillægge domme afsagt i andre medlemsstater samme retsvirkninger som nationale domme i overensstemmelse med national ret, uanset om disse retsvirkninger ifølge national ret betragtes som spørgsmål om faktiske forhold eller som retlige spørgsmål af processuel eller materiel karakter.
The principle that the Member States should attach to a conviction handed down in other Member States effects equivalent to those attached to a conviction handed down by their own courts in accordance with national law should be affirmed, whether those effects be regarded by national law as matters of fact or of procedural or substantive law.
Denne rammeafgørelse tager imidlertid ikke sigte på at harmonisere de konsekvenser, som tidligere domme skal have ifølge de forskellige nationale lovgivninger, og forpligtelsen til at tage hensyn til tidligere domme afsagt i andre medlemsstater eksisterer kun i det omfang, der tages hensyn til tidligere nationale domme i henhold til national ret.
However, this Framework Decision does not seek to harmonise the consequences attached by the different national legislations to the existence of previous convictions, and the obligation to take into account previous convictions handed down in other Member States exists only to the extent that previous national convictions are taken into account under national law.
I modsætning til andre instrumenter tager denne rammeafgørelse ikke sigte på fuldbyrdelse i en medlemsstat af retsafgørelser, der er truffet i andre medlemsstater, men tager snarere sigte på at gøre det muligt at knytte konsekvenser til en tidligere dom afsagt i en medlemsstat i forbindelse med en ny straffesag i en anden medlemsstat i det omfang, sådanne konsekvenser er knyttet til tidligere nationale domme i henhold til lovgivningen i den anden medlemsstat.
In contrast to other instruments, this Framework Decision does not aim at the execution in one Member State of judicial decisions taken in other Member States, but rather aims at enabling consequences to be attached to a previous conviction handed down in one Member State in the course of new criminal proceedings in another Member State to the extent that such consequences are attached to previous national convictions under the law of that other Member State.
Denne rammeafgørelse indebærer derfor ingen forpligtelse til at tage hensyn til sådanne tidligere domme i f.eks. tilfælde, hvor de oplysninger, der er fremskaffet i henhold til relevante instrumenter, ikke er tilstrækkelige, hvor den handling, som udløste den tidligere dom, ikke ville have givet anledning til en national dom, eller hvor den tidligere idømte sanktion ikke kendes i det nationale retssystem.
Therefore this Framework Decision contains no obligation to take into account such previous convictions, for example, in cases where the information obtained under applicable instruments is not sufficient, where a national conviction would not have been possible regarding the act for which the previous conviction had been imposed or where the previously imposed sanction is unknown to the national legal system.
De retsvirkninger, der tillægges en dom afsagt i en anden medlemsstat, bør svare til retsvirkningerne af en national afgørelse, der træffes i fasen før retssagen, under selve retssagen og i domsfuldbyrdelsesfasen.
The effects of a conviction handed down in another Member State should be equivalent to the effects of a national decision at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings, at the trial stage and at the time of execution of the sentence.
Når der under en straffesag i en medlemsstat foreligger oplysninger om en tidligere dom afsagt i en anden medlemsstat, bør det så vidt muligt undgås, at den berørte person behandles dårligere, end hvis den tidligere dom havde været en national dom.
Where, in the course of criminal proceedings in a Member State, information is available on a previous conviction in another Member State, it should as far as possible be avoided that the person concerned is treated less favourably than if the previous conviction had been a national conviction.
Artikel 3, stk. 5, bør bl.a. fortolkes i overensstemmelse med betragtning 8 på en sådan måde, at hvis den nationale ret i den nye straffesag under hensyntagen til en tidligere straf idømt i en anden medlemsstat er af den opfattelse, at idømmelse af straf af et bestemt omfang inden for den nationale lovgivnings rammer ville være uforholdsmæssigt hårdt over for lovovertræderen i betragtning af omstændighederne, og hvis straffens formål kan opfyldes ved en lavere straf, kan den nationale ret mindske omfanget af straffen i overensstemmelse hermed, såfremt dette ville have været muligt i rent nationale sager.
Article 3(5) should be interpreted, inter alia, in line with recital 8, in such a manner that if the national court in the new criminal proceedings, when taking into account a previously imposed sentence handed down in another Member State, is of the opinion that imposing a certain level of sentence within the limits of national law would be disproportionately harsh on the offender, considering his or her circumstances, and if the purpose of the punishment can be achieved by a lower sentence, it may reduce the level of sentence accordingly, if doing so would have been possible in purely domestic cases.
Denne rammeafgørelse træder i stedet for bestemmelserne om hensyntagen til straffedomme i artikel 56 i den europæiske konvention af 28. maj 1970 om straffedommes internationale retsvirkning i forholdet mellem de medlemsstater, som er part i nævnte konvention.
This Framework Decision is to replace the provisions of Article 56 of the European Convention of 28 May 1970 on the International Validity of Criminal Judgments, concerning the taking into consideration of criminal judgments, as between the Member States parties to that Convention.
I denne rammeafgørelse respekteres subsidiaritetsprincippet, jf. artikel 2 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union og artikel 5 i traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab, eftersom den har til formål at tilnærme medlemsstaternes love og administrative bestemmelser, og dette formål ikke i tilstrækkelig grad kan opfyldes af medlemsstaterne alene og derfor kræver en samordnet indsats på EU-plan.
This Framework Decision respects the principle of subsidiarity provided for by Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community in so far as it aims to approximate the laws and regulations of the Member States, which cannot be done adequately by the Member States acting unilaterally and requires concerted action in the European Union.
I overensstemmelse med proportionalitetsprincippet, jf. artikel 5 i traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab, går denne rammeafgørelse ikke ud over, hvad der er nødvendigt for at nå disse mål.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, this Framework Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
I denne rammeafgørelse respekteres de grundlæggende rettigheder og principperne i artikel 6 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union og i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder.
This Framework Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
I denne rammeafgørelse respekteres de mange forskellige nationale løsninger og procedurer, der er nødvendige for at tage hensyn til en tidligere dom afsagt i en anden medlemsstat.
This Framework Decision respects the variety of domestic solutions and procedures required for taking into account a previous conviction handed down in another Member State.
Udelukkelse af muligheden for på ny at prøve en tidligere dom bør ikke være til hinder for, at en medlemsstat om nødvendigt kan træffe en afgørelse om at tillægge sådanne tidligere domme samme retsvirkninger.
The exclusion of a possibility to review a previous conviction should not prevent a Member State from issuing a decision, if necessary, in order to attach the equivalent legal effects to such previous conviction.
Procedurerne omkring en sådan afgørelse bør imidlertid, i betragtning af den tid og de procedurer eller formalia, der kræves, ikke gøre det umuligt at tillægge en tidligere dom fra en anden medlemsstat tilsvarende retsvirkninger
However, the procedures involved in issuing such a decision should not, in view of the time and procedures or formalities required, render it impossible to attach equivalent effects to a previous conviction handed down in another Member State.
Indgreb i en dom eller fuldbyrdelse af denne omfatter bl.a. situationer, hvor den sanktion, der er idømt ved en tidligere dom, i overensstemmelse med den anden medlemsstats nationale ret skal absorberes eller medregnes i en anden sanktion, som derefter skal fuldbyrdes rent faktisk, i det omfang den første dom ikke allerede er fuldbyrdet eller dens fuldbyrdelse ikke er overført til den anden medlemsstat —
Interference with a judgment or its execution covers, inter alia, situations where, according to the national law of the second Member State, the sanction imposed in a previous judgment is to be absorbed by or included in another sanction, which is then to be effectively executed, to the extent that the first sentence has not already been executed or its execution has not been transferred to the second Member State,
Formålet med denne rammeafgørelse er at fastsætte, på hvilke betingelser der i forbindelse med en straffesag mod en person i en medlemsstat skal tages hensyn til tidligere domme afsagt mod samme person for andre forhold i andre medlemsstater.
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to determine the conditions under which, in the course of criminal proceedings in a Member State against a person, previous convictions handed down against the same person for different facts in other Member States, are taken into account.
Denne rammeafgørelse indebærer ikke nogen ændring af forpligtelsen til at respektere de grundlæggende rettigheder og grundlæggende retsprincipper som nedfældet i traktatens artikel 6.
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of amending the obligation to respect the fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty.
I denne rammeafgørelse forstås ved »dom«: alle endelige afgørelser truffet af en straffedomstol, hvori en person kendes skyldig i en strafbar handling.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision ‘conviction’ means any final decision of a criminal court establishing guilt of a criminal offence.
Hensyntagen til domme afsagt i andre medlemsstater i forbindelse med en ny straffesag
Taking into account, in the course of new criminal proceedings, a conviction handed down in another Member State
Medlemsstaterne sikrer, at der i forbindelse med en straffesag mod en person tages hensyn til tidligere domme afsagt mod samme person for andre forhold i andre medlemsstater, om hvilke der er fremskaffet oplysninger i henhold til relevante instrumenter om gensidig retshjælp eller om udveksling af oplysninger fra strafferegistre, i det omfang der tages hensyn til tidligere nationale domme, og at sådanne domme tillægges samme retsvirkninger som tidligere nationale domme i overensstemmelse med national ret.
Each Member State shall ensure that in the course of criminal proceedings against a person, previous convictions handed down against the same person for different facts in other Member States, in respect of which information has been obtained under applicable instruments on mutual legal assistance or on the exchange of information extracted from criminal records, are taken into account to the extent previous national convictions are taken into account, and that equivalent legal effects are attached to them as to previous national convictions, in accordance with national law.
Stk. 1 finder anvendelse i fasen før retssagen, under selve retssagen og i domsfuldbyrdelsesfasen, navnlig med hensyn til de relevante procedureregler, herunder reglerne for varetægtsfængsling, kvalifikationen af overtrædelsen, straffens type og omfang og reglerne for fuldbyrdelse af afgørelsen.
Paragraph 1 shall apply at the pre-trial stage, at the trial stage itself and at the time of execution of the conviction, in particular with regard to the applicable rules of procedure, including those relating to provisional detention, the definition of the offence, the type and level of the sentence, and the rules governing the execution of the decision.
Hensyntagen til tidligere domme afsagt i andre medlemsstater, jf. stk. 1, har ikke som virkning, at den medlemsstat, der gennemfører den nye retssag, griber ind i, ophæver eller på ny prøver tidligere domme eller eventuelle afgørelser vedrørende disses fuldbyrdelse.
The taking into account of previous convictions handed down in other Member States, as provided for in paragraph 1, shall not have the effect of interfering with, revoking or reviewing previous convictions or any decision relating to their execution by the Member State conducting the new proceedings.
Stk. 1 finder ikke anvendelse, jf. stk. 3, i det omfang hensyntagen til den tidligere dom, såfremt denne havde været en national dom afsagt i den medlemsstat, der gennemfører den nye retssag, i overensstemmelse med denne medlemsstats nationale ret ville have som virkning at gribe ind i, ophæve eller på ny prøve den tidligere dom eller en eventuel afgørelse vedrørende dens fuldbyrdelse.
In accordance with paragraph 3, paragraph 1 shall not apply to the extent that, had the previous conviction been a national conviction of the Member State conducting the new proceedings, the taking into account of the previous conviction would, according to the national law of that Member State, have had the effect of interfering with, revoking or reviewing the previous conviction or any decision relating to its execution.
Hvis den overtrædelse, for hvilken den nye retssag gennemføres, er begået inden den tidligere dom er afsagt eller fuldstændig fuldbyrdet, medfører stk. 1 og 2 ikke, at medlemsstaterne skal anvende nationale bestemmelser om idømmelse af straf, hvis anvendelsen af sådanne bestemmelser på udenlandske domme vil begrænse dommerens mulighed for at idømme en straf i forbindelse med en ny straffesag.
If the offence for which the new proceedings being conducted was committed before the previous conviction had been handed down or fully executed, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to apply their national rules on imposing sentences, where the application of those rules to foreign convictions would limit the judge in imposing a sentence in the new proceedings.
Medlemsstaterne sikrer imidlertid, at deres domstole i sådanne tilfælde på anden måde kan tage hensyn til tidligere domme, der er afsagt i andre medlemsstater.
However, the Member States shall ensure that in such cases their courts can otherwise take into account previous convictions handed down in other Member States.
Forholdet til andre retlige instrumenter
Relation to other legal instruments
Denne rammeafgørelse træder i stedet for artikel 56 i den europæiske konvention af 28. maj 1970 om straffedommes internationale retsvirkning i forbindelserne mellem de medlemsstater, som er part i nævnte konvention, uden at dette berører nævnte artikels anvendelse i forbindelserne mellem medlemsstaterne og tredjelande.
This Framework Decision shall replace Article 56 of the European Convention of 28 May 1970 on the International Validity of Criminal Judgments as between the Member States parties to that Convention, without prejudice to the application of that Article in relations between the Member States and third countries.
Medlemsstaterne træffer de nødvendige foranstaltninger til at efterkomme denne rammeafgørelse senest den 15. august 2010.
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by 15 August 2010.
Medlemsstaterne meddeler Generalsekretariatet for Rådet og Kommissionen teksten til de retsforskrifter, som de udsteder for at gennemføre de forpligtelser, der følger af denne rammeafgørelse, i national ret.
Member States shall communicate to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision.
På grundlag af disse oplysninger forelægger Kommissionen senest den 15. august 2011 en rapport for Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet om anvendelsen af denne rammeafgørelse om nødvendigt ledsaget af forslag.
On the basis of that information the Commission shall, by 15 August 2011, present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Framework Decision, accompanied if necessary by legislative proposals.
Europa-Parlamentets udtalelse af 27.9.2006 (endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT).
Opinion of 27 September 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Rådets rammeafgørelse 2008/841/RIA
Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA
om bekæmpelse af organiseret kriminalitet
on the fight against organised crime
under henvisning til traktaten om Den Europæiske Union, særlig artikel 29, artikel 31, stk. 1, litra e), og artikel 34, stk. 2, litra b),
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 29, 31(1)(e) and 34(2)(b) thereof,
Formålet med Haag-programmet er at forbedre EU’s og medlemsstaternes evne til i fællesskab bl.a. at bekæmpe den grænseoverskridende organiserede kriminalitet.
The objective of the Hague Programme is to improve the common capability of the Union and the Member States for the purpose, among others, of combating transnational organised crime.
Dette mål skal specielt nås gennem indbyrdes tilnærmelse af lovgivningerne.
This objective is to be pursued by, in particular, the approximation of legislation.
De kriminelle organisationers farlighed og deres udbredelse kræver en styrkelse af samarbejdet mellem Den Europæiske Unions medlemsstater, for at borgernes forventninger og medlemsstaternes behov kan opfyldes effektivt.
Closer cooperation between the Member States of the European Union is needed in order to counter the dangers and proliferation of criminal organisations and to respond effectively to citizens’ expectations and Member States’ own requirements.