natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sammenslutningen af EF-producenter og visse individuelle EF-producenter hævdede, at basisråmaterialerne i alle PSF-typer, herunder LMP, er de samme.
The association of Community producers and certain Community producers argued that the basic raw materials of all PSF types, including LMP, are the same.
Det skal i den forbindelse bemærkes, at alle PSF-typer, herunder LMP, er baseret på terephthalatsyre (TPA) og ethylenglycol (MEG).
In this respect, it should be noted that all PSF types, including LMP, are based on terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (MEG).
Disse råmaterialer udgør basiskomponenten, hvortil der kan tilføjes additiver eller yderligere komponenter for at sikre, at fibrene har visse særlige egenskaber, f.eks. lav smeltetemperatur som ved LMP.
These raw materials constitute the basic component, to which additives or additional components can be added in order to ensure certain specific properties of the fibre, such as low melting temperature in the case of LMP.
Derfor afvises påstanden om, at LMP er baseret på anderledes råmaterialer.
The claim that LMP is based on different raw materials is therefore rejected.
En eksporterende producent fremførte desuden, at faktoren »udseende« ikke er relevant for analysen af forskellige produkters eller produkttypers fysiske og tekniske egenskaber.
One exporting producer also argued that the factor ‘look’ is not relevant in analysing physical and technical characteristics of different products or product types.
I den forbindelse skal det bemærkes, at selve udseendet normalt ikke er et tilstrækkeligt grundlag til at definere den pågældende vare, især ikke for så vidt angår kemiske produkter.
In this respect, it is noted that the look by itself would normally not constitute sufficient basis for defining the product concerned, in particular when chemical products are concerned.
Det betyder imidlertid ikke, at der helt skal ses bort fra en sådan faktor.
However, this does not imply that such factor should be completely disregarded.
I dette tilfælde udgør det samme udseende yderligere en faktor i konstateringen af, at det er vanskeligt at sondre mellem LMP og andre typer af PSF.
In this particular case, the same look constitutes an additional element for finding that LMP and other types of PSF cannot be easily distinguished from each other.
Påstanden afvises derfor.
The claim is therefore rejected.
På grundlag af ovenstående konkluderes det, at LMP ikke kan betragtes som havende andre grundlæggende fysiske og kemiske egenskaber end andre PSF-typer, herunder især typer med tokomponentsammensætning.
In view of the above, it is concluded that LMP cannot be considered as having different basic physical and chemical characteristics than other PSF types, in particular those with bi-component composition.
Produktionsprocessen
Production process
Der mindes om, at de oprindelige undersøgelser påviste, at der i produktionsmæssig henseende generelt kan sondres mellem »virgin-PSF« baseret på nye råmaterialer og regenereret PSF baseret på genbrug af polyester.
It is recalled that the original investigations established that, from a production point of view, a general distinction can be made between virgin PSF, produced from virgin raw materials, and regenerated PSF, produced from recycled polyester.
Spindesystemer til tokomponentfibre har været anvendt i og uden for Fællesskabet i over 20 år.
Bi-component spinning systems are in operation in the Community and elsewhere for more than 20 years.
Fremstillingen ved tokomponentfibre er mere avanceret end ved monokomponentfibre; forskellen mellem de to systemer kan dog ikke betragtes som væsentlig.
The bi-component fibres' production is more sophisticated than that of mono-component fibres; however, the difference between the two systems is not such as to be considered substantial.
Nogle EF-brugere hævdede, at det ikke ville være omkostningseffektivt at omlægge produktionen til LMP.
Some Community users argued that it would not be cost-effective to switch to the production of LMP.
Det blev fremført, at selv om produktionslinjen for LMP og andre tokomponenttyper af PSF grundlæggende er den samme, ville omlægningen til fremstilling af LMP kræve visse ændringer, f.eks. udskiftning af spindedyser, og medføre betydelige driftsstop.
It was argued that although the production lines for LMP and other bi-component PSF types are basically the same, a switch to the production of LMP would require certain modifications, in particular the change of spinnerets, and would cause considerable downtimes.
På trods af, at en omlægning til fremstilling af LMP eller vice versa er teknisk mulig, er der ingen garanti for, at den vil være effektiv, hvilket kan påvirke den disponible LMP-kapacitet.
Thus, although switching to the production of LMP or vice versa is technically feasible, it may not be efficient and this may affect the available capacity for LMP.
Det blev fremført af sammenslutningen af EF-producenter og af en individuel EF-producent, at produktionsprocessen ved alle tokomponenttyper af PSF grundlæggende er den samme, og at en omlægning til LMP-fremstilling ikke er forbundet med tekniske problemer, men udelukkende afhænger af markedskræfterne, f.eks. efterspørgsel og priser.
The association of Community producers and one Community producer argued that the production process for all bi-component PSF is basically the same and switching to LMP production has no technical shortcomings, but that it purely depends on market forces such as demand and prices.
De hævdede desuden, at der er tilstrækkelig samlet kapacitet til at opfylde efterspørgslen efter LMP i Fællesskabet, hvis markedskræfterne muliggør det.
Furthermore, they argued that there is sufficient overall capacity to satisfy demand for LMP in the Community if the market conditions would allow.
For det andet kan omkostningseffektiviteten ved omlægning til fremstilling af LMP eller vice versa variere betydeligt fra producent til producent, men sådanne omlægninger foretages faktisk af nogle EF-producenter.
Secondly, the cost-effectiveness of switching to the production of LMP or vice versa may vary significantly from one producer to the other but it is in fact done by some Community producers.
Endelig afhænger en producents mulighed for at omlægge produktionen til LMP i vid udstrækning af, hvilke salgspriser der kan opnås for de forskellige PSF-typer på markedet.
Finally, whether a producer would switch to the production of LMP depends largely on the sales prices it can obtain for the different PSF types in the market.
I den forbindelse skal det også bemærkes, at der hverken i Fællesskabet eller de eksporterende lande findes nogen producenter, som udelukkende fremstiller LMP.
In this respect, it is also noted that there are no exclusive producers of LMP in the Community or the exporting countries concerned.
Derfor kan dette argument ikke ændre konklusionerne vedrørende produktionsprocessen.
Therefore, this argument cannot alter the conclusions in respect of the production process.
Produktionsprocessen, som i sig selv ikke er afgørende for definitionen af et produkt, kan således ikke anses for at være en faktor, som differentierer LMP fra andre PSF-typer.
The production process, which is as such not decisive for the definition of a product, can thus in any event not be considered as a factor differentiating LMP from other PSF types.
Typiske anvendelsesformål for LMP
Typical end-uses of LMP
På grund at sin lave smeltetemperatur anvendes LMP typisk som komponent i termisk sammenbundne ikke-vævede materialer til teknisk anvendelse og i termisk sammenbundne fyldematerialer.
LMP is because of its low melting temperature typically used as a component in thermally bonded technical non-woven applications and in thermally bonded filling applications.
De vigtigste anvendelsesformål forekommer inden for følgende varegrupper: husholdning (møbler, madrasser, puder), bilindustrien (tæpper, filtre), personlig hygiejne (bleer, absorptionsmidler), beklædning (for).
The main end-uses are in the following groups of products: household (furniture, mattresses, pillows), automotive (carpets, filters), hygienic personal care (nappies, absorbents), apparel (insulation).
Ved alle anvendelsesformål blandes og sammensmeltes LMP med andre PSF-fibre og udgør normalt omkring 15 % af sådanne blandinger.
In all its applications, LMP is mixed and melted with other PSF fibres and it usually represents around 15 % of the volume in such blends.
Nogle EF-brugere hævdede, at LMP kun i normalt termisk sammenbundet polster til anvendelsesformål som møbler og sengetøj udgør omkring 15 % af blandingen.
Some Community users argued that only in normal thermally bonded wadding for furniture and bedding end-uses LMP represents around 15 % in the blend.
Til visse andre anvendelsesformål f.eks. i absorptionslag varierer blandingen fra 35 % til 50 % af LMP, og i luftfiltre udgør LMP op til 70 % af blandingen.
In certain other applications, such as acquisition distribution layers, the blend ratio varies from 35 % to 50 % of LMP and in air filtration applications LMP represents up to 70 % in the blend.
Det skal i den forbindelse tilføjes, at LMP i nogle anvendelsesformer, f.eks. for i beklædningsgenstande, udgør mindre end 15 % af blandingen.
In this respect, it should be added that in some other applications, such as for instance apparel insulation wadding, LMP represents less than 15 % in the blend.
Den fornyede undersøgelse har vist, at LMP's relative volumen ved de forskellige anvendelsesformål ganske rigtigt varierer, men ved langt de fleste anvendelsesformål er det en minoritetskomponent (samlet gennemsnit omkring 15 %) sammenlignet med andre PSF-typer, som blandes i disse varer.
The review investigation has shown that the LMP's relative volume in its different end applications indeed varies, but it is in the vast majority of applications a minority component (overall on average around 15 %) as compared to other PSF types blended in these products.
Derfor bekræftes den i betragtning 29 omhandlede vurdering.
The assessment made in recital 29 is therefore confirmed.
De vigtigste brugere af LMP i Fællesskabet er virksomheder inden for industrien for ikke-vævede materialer.
The main users of LMP in the Community are non-woven application industries.
Disse virksomheder anvender typisk en lang række andre PSF-typer, som anvendes til ikke-vævede materialer.
These companies typically use a whole range of other PSF types belonging to the non-woven family.
Der er ingen specifikke LMP-brugere i Fællesskabet.
There are no specific users of LMP in the Community.
Det blev også konstateret, at der ikke er nogen væsentlig forskel på distributionskanalerne for LMP og andre typer af PSF.
It was also found that there is no substantial difference in distribution channels of LMP and other types of PSF.
Der mindes om, at LMP altid anvendes i blandinger med andre PSF-typer.
It is recalled that LMP is always used mixed with other PSF types.
En eksporterende producent fremførte, at den kendsgerning, at de samme brugere anvender LMP og andre typer af PSF, og at distributionskanalerne for LMP og andre typer PSF hovedsageligt er de samme, ikke betyder, at LMP og andre typer PSF er »den samme vare«.
One exporting producer argued that the fact that the same users use LMP and other types of PSF and that the distribution channels of LMP and other types of PSF are basically the same does not entail that LMP and other types of PSF are ‘like products’.
Det er korrekt, at denne kendsgerning ikke i sig selv betyder, at LMP og andre PSF-typer er at betragte som den samme vare; det viser imidlertid, at der ikke er nogen forskel på LMP og andre PSF-typer for så vidt angår distributionen af disse.
Indeed, this fact by itself does not entail that LMP and other PSF types should be considered as being one single product; however, it shows that no differences exist between LMP and other PSF types as far as their distribution is concerned.
Med andre ord er der distributionsmæssigt set ikke nogen grund til at udelukke LMP fra foranstaltningernes anvendelsesområde.
In other words, from a distribution point of view, no grounds exist for the exclusion of LMP from the scope of the measures.
Hertil kommer, at det i betragtning 29 blev påvist, at LMP har samme anvendelsesformål som andre PSF-typer, eftersom det kun kan anvendes i blandinger med disse fibre.
In addition, as it was demonstrated in recital 29, LMP has the same end-uses as other PSF types, since it can only be used in blend with these fibres.
I lyset af ovenstående konkluderes det, at LMP og andre PSF-typer har samme anvendelsesformål og distribueres via samme kanaler.
In view of the above, it is concluded that LMP and other PSF types have the same basic end-uses and they are distributed via the same channels.
Ombyttelighed
Interchangeability
Som beskrevet ovenfor besidder LMP visse særlige egenskaber, selv om dets grundlæggende fysiske og kemiske egenskaber ikke er forskellige fra andre PSF-typers.
As shown above, although LMP has no different basic physical and chemical characteristics than other PSF types, it has certain distinct properties.
Til mange anvendelsesformål kan LMP imidlertid erstattes af andre typer af PSF ved hjælp af andre bindingsteknologier, f.eks. harpiksbinding af PSF eller termobinding af PSF med anvendelse af andre smeltebindingsfibre.
However, in numerous applications LMP can be substituted by other types of PSF using different bonding technologies, such as resin bonding of PSF or thermo bonding of PSF with the use of other melt bonding fibres.
Det er derfor i høj grad ombytteligt med andre PSF-typer.
It is thus substantially interchangeable with other PSF types.
Nogle parter var uenige i den nævnte konklusion for så vidt angår muligheden for at erstatte LMP af andre PSF-typer.
Some parties challenged the aforesaid conclusion in respect of the interchangeability of LMP with other PSF types.
En eksporterende producent fremførte, at der ikke kan siges at være ombyttelighed mellem LMP og andre PSF-typer, eftersom harpiksbinding og binding med anvendelse af andre smeltebindingsfibre kræver, at LMP udskiftes med henholdsvis harpiks og bindefibre, som ikke er lavet af polyester.
One exporting producer argued that since resin bonding and bonding with the use of other melt bonding fibres requires substitution of LMP by resin and bonding fibres not made of polyesters respectively, there is no interchangeability of LMP with other PSF types.
Nogle EF-brugere hævdede, at den ovenfor omtalte brug af andre bindingsteknologier ville betyde forskellige egenskaber for visse slutprodukter, hvorfor en sådan ombytning ikke ville være mulig ved visse anvendelsesformål.
Some Community users argued that the use of other bonding technologies referred to above would result in different properties of certain end-products and, for this reason, in certain applications such substitution is not possible.
Disse argumenter blev yderligere undersøgt.
These arguments were further examined.
Undersøgelsen har vist, at selv om forskellige bindingsteknologier ikke altid kan erstatte hinanden ved alle endelige anvendelsesformål, er der en vis ombyttelighed, og således er LMP til visse anvendelsesformål i konkurrence med harpiksbundet PSF og med PSF, som er bundet med andet end kerne-kappe-bindingsfibre.
The investigation has shown that although different bonding technologies are not always interchangeable with each other in all end-applications, certain interchangeability exists and, thus, LMP is in competition with resin bonded PSF and with PSF bonded with other than core/sheath bonding fibres for certain applications.
Derfor kan det ikke generelt konkluderes, at der ikke findes erstatninger for LMP, og at LMP ikke er ombytteligt med visse andre PSF-typer.
Thus, it cannot be generally concluded that no substitutes to LMP exist and that it is not interchangeable with certain other PSF types.
En eksporterende producent bemærkede også, at hans argument om, at visse kemiske harpikstyper udgør en trussel mod miljøet og arbejdstagernes sundhed ikke var ordentligt undersøgt.
One exporting producer also noted that its argument concerning the threat to the environment and to the health of workers posed by certain chemical resins was not properly examined.
Det skal i den forbindelse bemærkes, at et sådant argument ikke er relevant i denne specifikke sag, eftersom harpiksbinding ved visse anvendelsesformål ikke kan erstattes af andre bindingsteknologier, og eftersom harpiksbinding under alle omstændigheder skal opfylde miljøforskrifterne i Fællesskabet og dets medlemsstater.
In this respect, it is noted that such argument is not relevant in this particular case, since in certain applications resin bonding cannot be substituted by other bonding technologies and, in any event, resin bonding must comply with any environmental requirements in the Community and its Member States.
Dette argument blev derfor afvist.
This argument is therefore rejected.
Sondring mellem LMP og andre typer af PSF
Distinction between LMP and other types of PSF
Der er ingen visuel og håndgribelig forskel på LMP og andre PSF-typer.
There is no visual and tangible difference between LMP and other PSF types.
Tværsnittet for LMP adskiller sig fra tværsnittet i monokomponentfibre; det adskiller sig imidlertid ikke altid fra tværsnittet i andre tokomponenttyper af PSF.
The cross-section of LMP is different from that of mono-component fibres; however, it is not always different from the cross-section of other bi-component PSF types.
Der mindes om, at LMP forekommer i talrige varianter, som bl.a. har forskellige smeltetemperaturer.
It is recalled that LMP exists in numerous variants having, for instance, different melting temperatures.
Det er derfor ikke muligt at foretage en klar sondring på grundlag af smeltetemperatur.
Thus, a clear distinction on the basis of melting temperature is not possible.
Heraf følger, at det er vanskeligt at sondre mellem LMP og andre PSF-typer, og at enhver pålidelig identifikation af denne produkttype ville kræve anvendelse af avanceret udstyr.
Therefore, it appears that LMP cannot be easily distinguished from other PSF types and that any reliable identification of this product type would require the use of sophisticated equipment.
Nogle EF-brugere var uenige i ovenstående konklusion om, at der kun vanskeligt kan sondres mellem LMP og andre PSF-typer, især for så vidt angår deres smeltetemperatur.
Some Community users disagreed with the above conclusion that LMP cannot be easily distinguished from other PSF types, in particular as far as its melting temperature is concerned.
Det blev fremført, at smeltepunktet for kappedelen i LMP, skønt det varierer mellem 110 °C og 190 °C, altid vil være betydeligt lavere end smeltepunktet for andre PSE-typer, som angiveligt er omkring 255 °C.
It was argued that the melting point of the sheath component of LMP, although varying between 110 °C and 190 °C, would always be considerably lower than the melting point of other PSF types, which is allegedly around 255 °C.
Det bemærkes, at ovenstående smeltetemperaturområde bekræfter, at LMP, i lighed med andre PSF-typer, findes i talrige varianter, og at de ikke altid let lader sig identificere.
It is noted that the above range of melting temperatures confirms that LMP, as well as other PSF types, exist in numerous variants and that their identification is not always easily feasible.
Således kan konklusionerne i betragtning 37 ikke ændres.
Thus, the conclusions drawn in recital 37 cannot be amended.
En eksporterende producent fremførte, at en beslutning om ikke at udelukke LMP fra foranstaltningernes anvendelsesområde ikke kan træffes på grundlag af selve den kendsgerning, at LMP visuelt ligner andre PSF-typer.
One exporting producer argued that the mere fact that LMP is visually similar to other PSF types cannot constitute a basis for non-excluding LMP from the scope of the measures.
Som beskrevet i betragtning 23 udgør selve »udseendet« et yderligere element i analysen, selv om det i sig selv normalt ikke er afgørende for besvarelsen af spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt forskellige varetyper skal betragtes som »en og samme vare« eller ej (jf. betragtning 16).
As explained in recital 23, although the ‘look’ by itself is normally not decisive for answering the question whether or not different product types should fall into a ‘single product’, it constitutes an additional element in the analysis (see also recital 16).
Der kan ikke ses bort fra den kendsgerning, at det er vanskeligt at sondre mellem forskellige varetyper.
The fact that different product types cannot be easily distinguished from each other cannot be ignored.
KONKLUSIONER OM VAREDÆKNINGEN
CONCLUSIONS ON THE PRODUCT SCOPE
Ovennævnte resultater viser, at LMP og andre PSF-typer har samme grundlæggende fysiske og tekniske egenskaber og har samme almindelige anvendelsesformål.
The above findings show that LMP and other PSF types share the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same basic end-uses.
Ved mange anvendelsesformål konkurrerer LMP direkte eller indirekte med andre PSF-typer på fællesskabsmarkedet.
In numerous applications, LMP directly or indirectly competes with other types of PSF on the Community market.
På det grundlag konkluderes det, at LMP og andre typer af PSF bør betragtes som en og samme vare, og at den delvise interimsundersøgelse vedrørende varedækningen for anvendelsen af de eksisterende antidumpingforanstaltninger bør afsluttes.
On this basis, it is concluded that LMP and other types of PSF should be considered as one single product and that the partial interim review concerning the product scope for the application of the existing anti-dumping measures should be terminated.
Alle de berørte parter fik oplysninger om de vigtigste kendsgerninger og betragtninger, på grundlag af hvilke de ovennævnte konklusioner blev draget.
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the above conclusions were reached.
Parterne fik en tidsfrist, inden for hvilken de kunne fremsætte bemærkninger til disse oplysninger.
Parties were granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
De mundtlige og skriftlige bemærkninger, som blev fremsendt af parterne, blev vurderet, men har ikke givet anledning til at ændre konklusionen om ikke at ændre varedækningen for de gældende antidumpingforanstaltninger på import af PSF —
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were considered, but have not changed the conclusions not to amend the product scope of the anti-dumping measures on imports of PSF in force,
Den delvise interimsundersøgelse i henhold til artikel 11, stk. 3, i forordning (EF) nr. 384/96 vedrørende varedækningen for de antidumpingforanstaltninger, der finder anvendelse på import af korte syntetiske fibre af polyester henhørende under KN-kode 55032000 med oprindelse i Folkerepublikken Kina, Saudi-Arabien, Belarus og Republikken Korea, afsluttes hermed, uden at de gældende antidumpingforanstaltninger ændres.
The partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of the product scope of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters, falling within CN code 55032000, originating in the People's Republic of China, Saudi Arabia, Belarus and the Republic of Korea is hereby terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force.
Ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 428/2005 (EUT L 71 af 17.3.2005, s. 1).
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 (OJ L 71, 17.3.2005, p. 1).
EUT C 174 af 14.7.2005, s. 15, EUT C 323 af 20.12.2005, s. 21.
OJ C 174, 14.7.2005, p. 15; OJ C 323, 20.12.2005, p. 21.
EUT C 325 af 22.12.2005, s. 20.
OJ C 325, 22.12.2005, p. 20.
Med hensyn til LMP afslørede den fornyede undersøgelse, at der ikke findes væsentlige produktionsmæssige forskelle mellem LMP og andre tokomponenttyper af PSF.
As regards LMP, this review investigation revealed that no significant difference in production of LMP and other bi-component PSF types exists.
Det blev vurderet, at en hvilken som helst producent af andre tokomponenttyper af PSF let kunne omlægge produktionen til LMP.
It was found that any producer of other bi-component PSF types could easily switch to the production of LMP.