natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Analysen af EF-erhvervsgrenens situation begrænses derfor ikke til EF-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet, men skal tillige omfatte alle de faktorer, der er anført i nævnte artikel.
The analysis of the situation of the Community industry is therefore not limited to the profitability of the Community industry alone, but must include all factors listed in that Article.
Som nævnt i betragtning 131 i forordningen om midlertidig told faldt rentabiliteten betragteligt i den betragtede periode, dvs. med 80 %, og som følge heraf forværredes EF-erhvervsgrenens finansielle situation dramatisk.
Furthermore, as outlined in recital 131 of the provisional Regulation, profitability dropped substantially during the period considered, i.e. by 80 %, and as a result the Community industry's financial situation deteriorated dramatically.
Det blev i den forbindelse ikke anset for relevant, om EF-erhvervsgrenen virkelig led tab i undersøgelsesperioden.
In this context, it was considered that it was irrelevant whether the Community industry did indeed realise losses during the IP.
Det bemærkes også, at den fortjenstmargen, som EF-erhvervsgrenen med rimelighed kunne forventes at opnå uden dumpingimport, blev i betragtning 169 i forordningen om midlertidig told fastsat til 12 %, hvilket bekræftes i betragtning 154, dvs. betydeligt højere end fortjenstmargenen i undersøgelsesperioden.
It is also noted that the profit margin that the Community industry could reasonably expect to achieve in the absence of dumped imports was determined in recital 169 of the provisional Regulation and confirmed in recital 154 with 12 %, i.e. significantly higher than the profit margin realised during the IP.
Hvad angår påstanden om, at de høje fortjenstmargener i 2003 var et tegn på, at EF-erhvervsgrenen ikke led væsentlig skade, bemærkes det, at selv hvis man ser bort fra fortjenstmargenerne det pågældende år, ville tendensen stadig være negativ.
With reference to the claim that the high profit margins realised in 2003 would be an indication that the Community industry did not suffer any material injury, it is noted that even if disregarding the profit margins realised in that year, the trend would still be significantly negative.
Fortjenesten faldt således med næsten 60 % mellem 2004 og undersøgelsesperioden.
Thus, profits fell between 2004 and the IP by almost 60 %.
Dette ændrer således ikke den overordnede konklusion, at EF-erhvervsgrenen led væsentlig skade i undersøgelsesperioden.
This would thus not change the overall conclusions that the Community industry suffered material injury during the IP.
En amerikansk eksporterende producent fremførte, at faldet i EF-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet kunne skyldes en afskrivning på 830 mio. EUR af immaterielle aktiver i forbindelse med købet af Laporte i 2005.
One exporting producer in the USA alleged that the profitability of Community industry may have decreased because of a EUR 830 million write-off of intangible assets linked to the acquisition of Laporte in 2005.
Det bør dog bemærkes, at den nedadgående tendens i rentabiliteten, jf. forordningen om midlertidig told, er konstant i den betragtede periode og ikke knyttet til et specifikt år.
It should be however noted that the downward trend of the profitability as set out in the provisional Regulation is constant over the period considered and not linked to a specific year.
Hertil kommer, at det af undersøgelsen fremgik, at omkostningerne i forbindelse med købet af Laporte blev båret af holdingselskabet og ikke af Degussa Initiators Co. Ltd. Dette forhold havde derfor ingen indflydelse på rentabilitetstendenserne som nævnt i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In addition, the investigation revealed that the cost for the acquisition of Laporte was taken by the holding company, not by Degussa Initiators Co. Ltd. This factor did therefore not have any impact on the profitability trends as shown in the provisional Regulation.
Endelige hævdede en af de amerikanske eksporterende producenter, at skadesanalysen var baseret på forkerte forventninger fra EF-erhvervsgrenens side om at opnå fortjenstmargener, som ligger over gennemsnittet for denne erhvervsgren.
Finally, one of the exporting producers in the USA claimed that the injury analysis was based on wrong expectations of the Community industry to obtain profit margins which are above the average of this industry.
Med hensyn til dette argument skal det for det først bemærkes, at det af betragtning 120-139 i forordningen om midlertidig told fremgår, at skadesanalysen var baseret på udviklingen i alle skadesindikatorer i den betragtede periode og således på EF-erhvervsgrenens faktiske situation i denne periode, hvilket gav et objektivt billede, der var baseret på kontrollerede faktiske data.
With regard to this argument, it should first be noted that, as it becomes apparent from recitals 120 to 139 of the provisional Regulation, the injury analysis was based on the developments of all injury indicators during the period considered and thus on the actual situation of the Community industry during that period, which gave an objective picture based on verified actual data.
Med andre ord blev Fællesskabets forventninger som sådan ikke anvendt som grundlag for en skadesanalyse, og dette argument blev derfor afvist.
In other words, the Community expectations as such did not serve as a basis in the injury analysis and this argument was therefore rejected.
En bruger fremførte, at der ikke var noget prisfald på EF-markedet, men fremlagde ingen beviser til støtte for denne påstand.
One user alleged that there was no price depression on the Community market, but did not submit any evidence to support this claim.
Eftersom de verificerede oplysninger fremlagt af de pågældende eksporterende producenter og EF-erhvervsgrenen tydeligt viste en nedadgående tendens i de gennemsnitlige salgspriser i den betragtede periode, måtte denne påstand afvises.
Since the verified information submitted by the exporting producers concerned and the Community industry clearly showed a downward trend in average selling prices during the period considered, this claim had to be rejected.
Da der ikke blev fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende EF-erhvervsgrenens situation, bekræftes betragtning 120-139 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the situation of the Community industry, recitals 120 to 139 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Dumpingimportens virkninger
Effects of dumped imports
I mangel af andre bemærkninger vedrørende dumpingimportens virkninger bekræftes hermed undersøgelsesresultaterne i betragtning 141-143 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
In the absence of any comments concerning the effects of dumped imports, the findings in recitals 141 to 143 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Import med oprindelse i andre tredjelande end Kina, USA og Taiwan
Imports originating in third countries other than the PRC, USA and Taiwan
Begge eksporterende producenter i USA fremførte, at import fra andre lande, navnlig Tyrkiet, kan have forvoldt EF-erhvervsgrenen skade, fordi priserne angiveligt var lavere end de amerikanske priser.
Both exporting producers in the USA alleged that imports from other countries, and in particular from Turkey, may have caused injury to the Community industry particularly in view of their prices which are allegedly lower than the prices from the USA.
Der skulle navnlig have været en betydelig import til dumpingpriser, der lå langt under EF-erhvervsgrenens priser.
In particular, it was claimed that these imports were made in significant quantities and at dumped prices which undercut significantly the Community industry prices.
Begge eksporterende producenter hævdede, at importen fra Tyrkiet havde skadet EF-erhvervsgrenen mindst lige så meget som importen fra USA, hvis ikke mere.
Both exporting producers claimed that imports from Turkey had injured the Community industry at least to the same degree as imports from the USA, if not to a larger extent.
For det første bør det noteres, at Tyrkiet ikke var omfattet af klagen, fordi klagerne ikke havde fundet nogen dokumentation for skadelig dumping fra Tyrkiet.
First, it should be noted that Turkey was not included in the complaint because the complainants had not found any evidence of injurious dumping from Turkey.
På det tidspunkt, da proceduren blev indledt, havde Kommissionen ingen dokumentation, der modsagde klagernes påstand.
At the time of the initiation of this proceeding, the Commission did not have any evidence at its disposal that contradicted the complainants' statement.
For det andet kan det forhold, at de tyrkiske eksportpriser synes at ligge under de amerikanske priser, hvis man ser på gennemsnitspriserne i Eurostats handelsstatistikker, skyldes, at de to lande eksporterer forskellige varesortimenter.
Secondly, the fact that Turkish export prices may appear to be lower than the prices from the USA when looking at average prices emanating from Eurostat trade statistics may be the result of a different product mix exported by the two countries.
Det fremgår af de foreliggende oplysninger, at den amerikanske eksport i stort omfang består af kaliummonopersulfat, hvorimod der hverken på det indledende stadium eller i forbindelse med undersøgelsen forelå nogen dokumentation for, at den tyrkiske eksport til Fællesskabet udgøres af samme varesortiment.
Indeed, on the basis of available information, the exports from the USA consist to a large extent of KMPS whereas, neither at initiation stage nor during the investigation, was any evidence available that Turkish exports to the Community show a similar product mix.
Der kan derfor ikke drages nogen anvendelig konklusion ud fra forskelle i de gennemsnitlige Eurostat-priser.
Therefore, no meaningful conclusion could be drawn from differences in average Eurostat prices.
Endelig bør det erindres, at de pågældende eksporterende producenter heller ikke fremlagde nogen sådan dokumentation.
Finally, it should be recalled that neither was any such evidence provided by the exporting producers concerned.
Af de årsager, der er anført i betragtning 48-55 blev virkningerne af alle tre eksporterende landes dumpingimport vurderet kumulativt i analysen af EF-erhvervsgrenens situation.
When analysing the situation of the Community industry, the effects of the dumped imports from all three exporting countries concerned were assessed cumulatively for the reasons set out in recitals 48 to 55.
Man fandt det derfor ikke hensigtsmæssigt, at analysen vedrørende årsagssammenhæng skulle tage udgangspunkt i hvert enkelt land for sig.
On this basis, it was considered inappropriate to base the analysis with regard to causation on each country concerned separately.
Men selv hvis man betragter den amerikanske eksport separat, er tendensen i importen fra USA og Tyrkiet forskellig.
However, even if considering imports from the USA separately, import trends from the USA and Turkey are different.
Medens importmængderne fra Tyrkiet faldt betydeligt i den betragtede periode (med 42 %), steg den amerikanske importmængde og markedsandel.
While import volumes of Turkey significantly decreased during the period considered (i.e. by 42 %), import volume and market share from the USA increased.
Med hensyn til priser fremlagde den eksporterende producent ingen dokumentation for dumping fra Tyrkiets side, og en sådan dokumentation var heller ikke på anden vis tilgængelig.
As far as prices are concerned no evidence of dumping from Turkey was submitted by the exporting producer or was otherwise available.
Hvad angår underbud, fremgår det af den foreliggende dokumentation, at varesortimentet, som eksporteredes fra Tyrkiet, var forskelligt fra varesortimentet fra USA, navnlig var der ingen produktion af kaliummonopersulfat i Tyrkiet.
Likewise, as far as undercutting is concerned, on the basis of the evidence available, the product mix exported from Turkey was different from that from the USA; in particular in Turkey there was no production of KMPS.
Ved sammenligning af gennemsnitspriser fra USA eksklusive eksport af kaliummonopersulfat og gennemsnitspriser fra Tyrkiet blev det konstateret, at de tyrkiske priser var højere end de amerikanske.
When comparing average prices from the USA excluding exports of KMPS and average export prices from Turkey, it was found that Turkish prices were higher than the prices from the USA.
På dette grundlag bekræftes konklusionerne i betragtning 144-148 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
On the basis of the above, the conclusions as set out in recitals 144 to 148 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Flere af de interesserede parter fremførte på ny, at en EF-producents import af den pågældende vare fra dennes forretningsmæssigt forbundne selskab i Kina blev dumpet og underbød EF-erhvervsgrenens priser, hvilket var årsag til prisfald på EF-markedet.
It was reiterated by several interested Parties that the imports of one Community producer of the product concerned from its related company in PRC were dumped and undercut the Community industry sales prices causing the price depression on the Community market.
En eventuel skade ville derfor være forårsaget af denne import og således selvforskyldt.
Any injury would therefore be a consequence of these imports and thus self-inflicted.
EF-erhvervsgrenens import fra sin forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomhed i Kina tegnede sig kun for en mindre del af forbruget i Fællesskabet (under 4 %) og under 8 % af den pågældende EF-producents salg, og den gennemførtes kun for at beholde globale kunder, som ellers ville have købt den pågældende vare fra kinesiske leverandører til dumpingpriser.
Imports of the Community industry from its related company in the PRC only represented a minor part of the Community consumption (less than 4 %) and less than 8 % of the sales of the Community producer in question and were only made to maintain the custom of global customers who would otherwise have purchased the product concerned from the Chinese suppliers at dumped prices.
Ingen af de ovennævnte interesserede parter fremlagde nogen dokumentation eller forklarede, hvordan disse relativt små mængder (sammenlignet med dumpingimporten til ikke-forretningsmæssigt forbundne kunder i Fællesskabet) kunne være hovedårsagen til prisfaldet på EF-markedet, og denne påstand måtte derfor afvises.
None of the abovementioned interested Parties submitted any evidence or explained how these relatively small quantities (in comparison to the dumped imports made to unrelated customers in the Community) could have been the main factor for the price depression in the Community market and this claim had therefore to be rejected.
EF-erhvervsgrenens investeringer i Kina
Investments of the Community industry in the PRC
En af de amerikanske eksporterende producenter hævdede, at den nedadgående tendens i EF-erhvervsgrenens investeringer, jf. tabel 8 i forordningen om midlertidig told, skyldtes, at en af EF-producenterne øgede sine investeringer i sin forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomhed i Kina, og således ikke skyldtes dumpingimport.
One of the exporting producers in the USA claimed that the downward trend of the investment activities of the Community industry shown in Table 8 of the provisional Regulation was due to an increased investment activity of one of the Community producers in its related company in the PRC and thus not due to the dumped imports.
Det bemærkes at EF-erhvervsgrenens uudnyttede kapacitet var høj og nåede næsten op på 30 % i undersøgelsesperioden.
It is noted that the spare capacity of the Community industry was high, i.e. reached almost 30 % during the IP.
Under disse omstændigheder og i betragtning af, at dumpingimporten steg betydeligt i den betragtede periode og overtog en del af EF-erhvervsgrenens markedsandele, var det opfattelsen, at det ikke ville have været rimeligt at investere i en øget produktionskapacitet på EF-markedet.
Under these circumstances, and taking into account that dumped imports increased significantly during the period considered and took over part of the Community industry's market shares, it was considered that it would have been unreasonable to invest in an increase of production capacity on the Community market.
Som nævnt i betragtning 129 i forordningen om midlertidig told havde investeringerne til formål at opretholde eksisterende produktionskapacitet.
However, as mentioned in recital 129 of the provisional Regulation, investments were made to maintain existing production capacities.
Under de givne omstændigheder blev dette anset for en rimelig erhvervsmæssig beslutning på baggrund af dumpingimporten.
Under the given circumstances, this was considered as a reasonable business decision against the background of the dumped imports.
Det konkluderedes derfor, at de faldende investeringer på EF-markedet ikke havde forbindelse til denne producents investeringer på det kinesiske marked og derfor ikke indikerede, at den lidte skade var selvforskyldt.
It was therefore concluded that the decrease in investments in the Community market was not connected to the investment activities of this producer in the Chinese market and did therefore not indicate that the injury suffered was self-inflicted.
EF-erhvervsgrenens øvrige aktiviteter i Kina
Other activities of the Community industry in the PRC
En ikke-forretningsmæssigt forbundet importør hævdede, at produktionen, produktionskapaciteten og udnyttelsen faldt som følge af en af EF-producenternes forbindelse til en af de eksporterende producenter i Kina.
One unrelated importer claimed that the production, production capacity and utilisation decreased due to the relationship of one of the Community producers with one of the exporting producers in the PRC.
Denne importør fremførte, at den forretningsmæssigt forbundne kinesiske producent ville forsyne det sydasiatiske marked med persulfat til en lavere pris, som var produceret af den forretningsmæssigt forbundne virksomhed i Kina, og at EF-producenten derfor mindskede sin eksport til dette område betydeligt, hvilket var grunden til faldet i produktionsmængden i Fællesskabet.
This importer claimed that the related Chinese producer would serve the South Asian market with the lower priced persulphate produced by the related company in the PRC and as a consequence the Community producer decreased significantly its exports to this area, which would be the reason for the decrease of the production volume in the Community.
Det bør noteres, at udviklingen for produktionsmængde, kapacitet og kapacitetsudnyttelse som nævnt i betragtning 120 i forordningen om midlertidig told (tabel 5) hænger sammen med produktionsmængden for varer, der solgtes i Fællesskabet.
It should be noted that the trends with regard to production volume, capacity and capacity utilisation as shown in recital 120 of the provisional Regulation (Table 5) are related to the production volume for products sold in the Community.
Det påståede fald i en af EF-producenternes eksport havde derfor ingen indvirkning, og importørens påstand måtte derfor afvises.
The alleged decrease in exports of one of the Community producer had therefore no impact and the importer's claim had to be rejected.
En af de amerikanske eksporterende producenter påstod, at der i forordningen om midlertidig told ikke blev taget hensyn til, at stigende produktionsomkostninger kunne være en plausibel grund til den skade, som EF-erhvervsgrenen havde lidt.
One of the exporting producers in the USA claimed that the increase in production cost as a plausible cause of the injury suffered by the Community industry was not addressed in the provisional Regulation.
Denne påstand måtte afvises.
This claim had to be rejected.
Årsagen til stigningen i EF-erhvervsgrenens enhedsomkostninger er beskrevet i betragtning 125 i forordningen om midlertidig told.
The reason for the Community industry's increase in the unit cost is outlined in recital 125 of the provisional Regulation.
Den er et resultat af faldet i produktionsmængden som følge af dumpingimporten, samtidig med at kapaciteten var stabil.
Thus, it is the result of the decrease in production volume due to the dumped imports at stable capacities.
Som et resultat blev SA&G-omkostninger fordelt på mindre produktionsmængder, hvilket fik enhedsomkostningerne til at stige.
As a result, overhead costs were allocated to lower production volumes which increased the unit costs.
Eftersom der er en direkte forbindelse til dumpingimporten, måtte den pågældende eksporterende producents argument afvises.
Since there is a direct link to the dumped imports, the argument of the exporting producer concerned had to be rejected.
EF-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet i 2003
Profitability levels of the Community industry in 2003
Den samme amerikanske eksporterende producent hævdede, at grundene til den høje rentabilitet i 2003 burde have været yderligere analyseret og taget i betragtning i årsagssammenhængsanalysen.
The same exporting producer in the USA claimed also that the reasons for the high levels in profitability in 2003 should have been analysed further and taken into consideration in the causality analysis.
Denne eksporterende producent kunne heller ikke forklare eller dokumentere, hvordan rentabiliteten i 2003 kunne have brudt årsagssammenhængen mellem dumpingimporten og den skade, som EF-erhvervsgrenen havde lidt.
This exporting producer also failed to provide any explanation or evidence as to how the profit levels in 2003 could have broken the causal link between the dumped imports and the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt fortjenstmargenerne i 2003 kunne indikere, at EF-erhvervsgrenen ikke led væsentlig skade i undersøgelsesperioden, er behandlet i betragtning 63.
The question whether the profit margins realised in 2003 would indicate that the Community industry did not suffer material injury during the IP is addressed in recital 63.
En af EF-producenternes fusionsomkostninger
Cost of the merger of one of the Community producers
Den anden eksporterende producent i USA hævdede, at omkostningsstigningen og dermed faldet i EF-erhvervsgrenens rentabilitet i undersøgelsesperioden skyldtes, at en af EF-producenterne købte en virksomhed, og at dette medførte en betydelig afskrivning af immaterielle aktiver i deres regnskaber.
The other exporting producer in the USA claimed that the cost increase and consequently the decrease in the Community industry's profitability during the IP were due to the acquisition of a company by one of the Community producers and the consequent significant write-off of intangible assets in their accounting.
Den nedadgående tendens i rentabiliteten, som anført i tabel 9 i betragtning 130 i forordningen om midlertidig told, er konstant og ikke knyttet til et specifikt år i den betragtede periode.
However, the downward trend of the profitability as set out in Table 9 of recital 130 of the provisional Regulation is constant and not linked to a specific year during the period considered.
Hertil kommer, at det af undersøgelsen fremgik, at omkostningerne i forbindelse med købet ikke blev båret af EF-producenten, men af dennes holdingselskab.
In addition, the investigation revealed that the cost of the acquisition was not borne by the Community producer but by its holding company.
Konkurrencefjendtlig adfærd hos EF-erhvervsgrenen
Uncompetitive behaviour of the Community industry
En bruger hævdede, at de kinesiske producenter, der var forretningsmæssigt forbundne med EF-erhvervsgrenen, tilbød den pågældende vare på EF-markedet til priser, der lå langt over markedspriserne, medens de samme producenter var i stand til at tilbyde varen til meget lavere priser på et hvilket som helst andet marked, ja endog til priser, der lå under deres konkurrenters priser på disse tredjelandsmarkeder.
One user claimed that the Chinese producers related to the Community industry offered the product concerned on the Community market at levels that were largely above the market prices, while the same producers were able to offer the product at much lower prices in any other given market, and even below the price levels of their competitors in these third markets.