natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Navnlig er »Public Health Department (PHD) under the Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)« i stand til effektivt at føre kontrol med, om de gældende bestemmelser overholdes.
In particular, the ‘Public Health Department (PHD) under the Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)’ is capable of effectively verifying the implementation of the rules in force.
PHD-MHE har officielt forsikret, at standarderne for sundhedskontrol og overvågning af fiskevarer som fastsat i kapitel V i bilaget til direktiv 91/493/EØF vil blive overholdt, og at hygiejnekrav svarende til dem, der er fastsat i nævnte direktiv, vil blive opfyldt.
The PHD-MHE has provided official assurances on compliance with the standards for health controls and monitoring of fishery products as set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and on the fulfilment of hygienic requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive.
Der bør fastsættes nærmere bestemmelser for fiskevarer, der importeres til Fællesskabet fra Grenada, i overensstemmelse med direktiv 91/493/EØF.
It is appropriate to lay down detailed provisions concerning fishery products imported into the Community from Grenada, in accordance with Directive 91/493/EEC.
Disse lister bør opstilles på grundlag af en meddelelse fra PHD-MHE til Kommissionen.
Those lists should be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the PHD-MHE to the Commission.
»Public Health Department (PHD) under the Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)« er den ansvarlige myndighed i Grenada for kontrol og attestering af, at fiskevarer opfylder kravene i direktiv 91/493/EØF.
The ‘Public Health Department (PHD) under the Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)’shall be the competent authority in Grenada identified for the purposes of verifying and certifying compliance of fishery products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
Fiskevarer, der indføres til Fællesskabet fra Grenada, skal opfylde artikel 3, 4 og 5.
Fishery products imported into the Community from Grenada shall meet the requirements set out in Articles 3, 4 and 5.
Sundhedscertifikatet indeholder PHD-MHE-repræsentantens navn, stilling og underskrift samt PHD-MHE's officielle stempel i en anden farve end de øvrige angivelser i certifikatet.
The health certificate shall bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the PHD-MHE, and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of the endorsements.
Alle pakninger er med uudslettelig skrift forsynet med ordet »GRENADA« og oprindelsesvirksomhedens, -fabriksfartøjets, -kølehusets eller -fryseskibets autorisations-/registreringsnummer, medmindre der er tale om frosne fiskevarer i løs afladning til konservesfremstilling.
All packages shall bear the word ‘GRENADA’ and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin in indelible letters, except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods.
Senest ændret ved forordning (EU) nr. 806/2003 (EUT L 122 af 16.5.2003, s. 1).
Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).
for fiskevarer fra Grenada, der er bestemt til eksport til Det Europæiske Fællesskab, bortset fra alle former for toskallede bløddyr, pighuder, sækdyr og havsnegle
for fishery products from Grenada and intended for export to the European Community, excluding bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in whatever form
Public Health Department (PHD) under Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)
Public Health Department (PHD) under the Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)
Navn og officielt autorisations-/registreringsnummer på den eller de virksomheder eller det eller de fabriksfartøjer, kølehuse eller fryseskibe, som PHD-MHE har autoriseret/registreret til eksport til Det Europæiske Fællesskab:
Name(s) and official approval/registration number(s) of establishment(s), factory vessel(s), or cold store(s) approved or freezer vessel(s) registered by PHD-MHE for export to the EC:
(Afsendelsessted)
(place of dispatch)
(Bestemmelsesland og -sted)
(country and place of destination)
Undertegnede officielle inspektør erklærer at være bekendt med bestemmelserne i direktiv 91/493/EØF, direktiv 92/48/EØF og beslutning 2005/500/EF.
The undersigned official inspector hereby declares that he is aware of the provisions of Directives 91/493/EEC and 92/48/EEC and Decision 2005/500/EC.
(Navn med blokbogstaver, titel og stilling)
(Name in capital letters, capacity and qualifications of person signing)
ZV Fryseskib
PP Processing plant
PP Forarbejdningsvirksomhed
ZV Freezer vessel
A Kun kølehuse
A Cold store only
St. George's
St George's
Autorisations-nr.
Approval No Name
By/Region
Region
om ændring af beslutning 97/296/EF om listen over tredjelande, hvorfra det er tilladt at indføre fiskerivarer til konsum, for så vidt angår Algeriet, Bahamas og Grenada
amending Decision 97/296/EC drawing up the list of third countries from which the import of fishery products is authorised for human consumption, with respect to Algeria, the Bahamas and Grenada
(meddelt under nummer K(2005) 2551)
(notified under document number C(2005) 2551)
under henvisning til Rådets beslutning 95/408/EF af 22. juni 1995 om betingelserne for opstilling i en overgangsperiode af midlertidige lister over tredjelandsvirksomheder, hvorfra medlemsstaterne kan indføre visse animalske produkter, fiskerivarer og levende toskallede bløddyr [1], særlig artikel 2, stk. 2, og
Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs [1], and in particular Article 2(2) thereof,
Ved Kommissionens beslutning 97/296/EF af 22. april 1997 om listen over tredjelande, hvorfra det er tilladt at indføre fiskerivarer til konsum [2] er der opstillet en liste over lande og områder, hvorfra det er tilladt at importere fiskevarer til konsum.
Commission Decision 97/296/EC of 22 April 1997 drawing up the list of third countries from which the import of fishery products is authorised for human consumption [2], lists the countries and territories from which import of fishery products for human consumption is authorised.
I Kommissionens beslutning 2005/498/EF [4], 2005/499/EF [5] og 2005/500/EF [6] er der fastsat særlige betingelser for import af fiskevarer fra Algeriet, Bahamas og Grenada.
Commission Decisions 2005/498/EC [4], 2005/499/EC [5] and 2005/500/EC [6], set specific import conditions for fishery products from Algeria, the Bahamas and Grenada.
Disse lande bør derfor optages på listen i del I i bilaget til beslutning 97/296/EF.
Those countries should therefore be included in the list in part I of the Annex to Decision 97/296/EC.
Nærværende beslutning bør anvendes fra samme dato som beslutning 2005/498/EF, 2005/499/EF og 2005/500/EF, for så vidt angår import af fiskevarer fra Algeriet, Bahamas og Grenada.
This Decision should apply from the same day as Decisions 2005/498/EC, 2005/499/EC and 2005/500/EC as regards the import of fishery products from Algeria, the Bahamas and Grenada.
Senest ændret ved Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2004/41/EF (EUT L 157 af 30.4.2004, s. 33. Berigtiget i EUT L 195 af 2.6.2004, s. 12).
Decision as last amended by Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 33) (corrected version in OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 12).
Senest ændret ved beslutning 2005/219/EF (EUT L 69 af 16.3.2005, s. 55).
Decision as last amended by Decision 2005/219/EC (OJ L 69, 16.3.2005, p. 55).
Se side 92 i denne EUT.
See page 92 of this Official Journal.
Se side 99 i denne EUT.
See page 99 of this Official Journal.
Se side 104 i denne EUT.
See page 104 of this Official Journal.
Liste over lande og områder, hvorfra det er tilladt at indføre fiskevarer til konsum, uanset under hvilken form
list of countries and territories from which importation of fishery products in any form intended for human consumption is authorised
I. Lande og områder, der er omfattet af en særlig beslutning i henhold til direktiv 91/493/EØF
I. Countries and territories covered by a specific decision pursuant to Council Directive 91/493/EEC
BS — Bahamas
BS — The Bahamas
CI — Côte d'Ivoire
CI — Ivory Coast
CN — Kina
CN — China
CS — Serbien og Montenegro [1]CU — Cuba
CS — Serbia and Montenegro [1]CU — Cuba
CV — Kap Verde
CV — Cape Verde
EG — Egypten
EG — Egypt
GN — Guinea
GN — Guinea Conakry
ID — Indonesien
ID — Indonesia
KR — Sydkorea
KR — South Korea
KZ — Kasakhstan
KZ — Kazakhstan
MR — Mauretanien
MR — Mauritania
MV — Maldiverne
MV — Maldives
PG — Papua Ny Guinea
PG — Papua New Guinea
PH — Filippinerne
PH — Philippines
PM — Saint Pierre og Miquelon
PM — St Pierre and Miquelon
RU — Rusland
RU — Russia
SA — Saudi-Arabien
SA — Singapore
SC — Seychellerne
SC — Seychelles
SG — Singapore
SG — Saudi Arabia
SR — Surinam
SR — Suriname
Lande og områder, der opfylder betingelserne i artikel 2, stk. 2, i beslutning 95/408/EF
Countries and territories meeting the terms of Article 2(2) of Council Decision 95/408/EC
AM — Armenien [2]AO — Angola
AM — Armenia [2]AO — Angola
AZ — Aserbajdsjan [3]
AZ — Azerbaijan [3]
CG — Republikken Congo [4]CM — Cameroun
CG — Republic of Congo [4]CM — Cameroon
SB — Salomonøerne
SB — Solomon Islands
SH — Saint Helena
SH — St Helena
Kun godkendt i forbindelse med import af fiskevarer, der er fanget, frosset og indpakket i den endelige emballage til havs.«
Authorised only for imports of fishery products caught, frozen and packed in their final packaging at sea.’
om en procedure efter EF-traktatens artikel 81 (Sag COMP/C.37.750/B2 — Brasseries Kronenbourg — Brasseries Heineken)
relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/C.37.750/B2 — Brasseries Kronenbourg — Brasseries Heineken)
(meddelt under nummer K(2004) 3597)
(notified under document number C(2004) 3597)
Den 29. september 2004 vedtog Kommissionen en beslutning i forbindelse med en procedure efter EF-traktatens artikel 81.
On 29 September 2004, the Commission adopted a decision relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty.
I overensstemmelse med artikel 30 i Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1/2003 [1] offentliggør Kommissionen hermed parternes navne og beslutningens hovedindhold, herunder de pålagte sanktioner, under hensyntagen til virksomhedernes berettigede interesse i, at deres forretningshemmeligheder ikke afsløres.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 30 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 [1], the Commission herewith publishes the names of the parties and the main content of the decision, including any penalties imposed, having regard to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business interests.
En ikke-fortrolig udgave af beslutningens fulde ordlyd kan findes på sagens autentiske sprog og på Kommissionens arbejdssprog på webstedet for Generaldirektoratet for Konkurrence: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_da.htmlI.
A non-confidential version of the full text of the decision can be found in the authentic languages of the case and in the Commission’s working languages at DG COMP web-site at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.htmlI.
Beslutningen vedrører en »våbenhvileaftale« i forbindelse med øl, der sælges i Frankrig til konsum uden for hjemmet (»udskænkningsmarkedet«).
The decision relates to an ‘armistice’ agreement regarding the sale of beer in France for consumption away from home (on-trade sector).
Kommissionen har samlet beviser for, at de to største bryggerikoncerner i Frankrig, Brasseries Kronenbourg SA og Heineken France SA (tidligere »Sogebra«), og deres respektive moderselskaber, som på tidspunktet for de faktiske omstændigheder var Groupe Danone og Heineken NV, den 21. marts 1996 indgik en aftale som følge af »krigen om drikkevaregrossisterne«.
The Commission has gathered evidence showing that on 21 March 1996, the two main brewery groups in France, Brasseries Kronenbourg SA and Heineken France SA (previously: Sogebra) and their respective mother companies at the time of the facts, Groupe Danone and Heineken NV, have concluded this agreement, following an ‘acquisition war’ regarding drinks wholesalers.
Aftalen vedrører på den ene hånd kampen om drikkevaregrossister og på den anden en afbalancering af de berørte parters integrerede distributionsnet.
The agreement concerns, on the one hand, the acquisition of drinks wholesalers, with the aim of bringing a rapid end to the rising costs of acquiring these companies, and on the other hand, the balancing of the integrated distribution networks of the parties concerned.
»Våbenhvileaftalen« er imidlertid aldrig blevet gennemført.
The ‘armistice’ agreement has, however, never been implemented.
RESUMÉ AF SAGEN
SUMMARY OF THE CASE
Sagens baggrund og etaper
Origin of the case and procedural steps
Sagen blev indledt på grundlag af oplysninger fra Interbrew NV (nu »Inbev NV«) i forbindelse med en belgisk bryggerikartelsag (Kommissionens beslutning 2003/569/EF af 5. december 2001 om en procedure i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 81 (Sag IV/37.614/F3 — PO/Interbrew og Alken-Maes), EUT L 200 af 7.8.2003, s. 1).
The case started on the basis of information provided by Interbrew NV (now Inbev NV) in the framework of the Belgian brewery cartel case (Commission Decision 2003/569/EC of 5 December 2001 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty, (Case IV/37.614/F3 PO/Interbrew and Alken-Maes) (OJ L 200, 7.8.2003, p. 1)).
På grundlag af disse oplysninger foretog Kommissionen flere undersøgelser i løbet af 2000 og anmodede om yderligere oplysninger.
On the basis of this information, the Commission conducted several inspections in the year 2000 and has completed its investigation by requests for information.
Den 4. februar 2004 indledte Kommissionen proceduren og vedtog en klagepunktsmeddelelse mod Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, Heineken France SA, Groupe Danone og Heineken NV.
On February 4, 2004 the Commission opened the proceedings and adopted a statement of objections against Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, Heineken France SA, Groupe Danone and Heineken NV.
Alle har svaret Kommissionen skriftligt.
All parties have submitted a written reply to the Commission.
De har imidlertid givet afkald på deres ret til at blive hørt.
They have, however, renounced their right to a hearing.
Den berørte sektor
The sector concerned
Sagen vedrører salg af øl på udskænkningsmarkedet i Frankrig.
This case concerns the sales of beer in France in the on-trade sector.
De virksomheder, der deltog i aftalen, sad tilsammen på ca. tre fjerdedele af den mængde øl, der blev konsumeret i Frankrig i 1999.
Together, the companies participating in the agreement represented approximately three quarters of the volume of beer consumed in France in 1999.
Kommissionen noterede sig følgende overtrædelse: Den 12. februar 1996 meddelte Heineken NV og Heineken France SA Groupe Danone og Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, at de havde til hensigt at overtage Fischer-koncernen og Saint Arnould-koncernen.
The Commission withheld the following infringement: on 12 February 1996, Heineken NV and Heineken France SA announced their intention to acquire the groups Fischer and Saint Arnould to Groupe Danone and Brasseries Kronenbourg SA.
Da Fischer-koncernen og Saint Arnould-koncernen forestod distributionen af en væsentlig mængde Kronenbourg-øl, udløste dette en sand krig om drikkevaregrossisterne.
Since the groups Fischer and Saint Arnould distributed an important volume of Kronenbourg beer, this triggered a genuine acquisition war.
Hver bryggerikoncern kæmpede således om og fik en lang række drikkevaregrossister, hvilket medførte en stærk stigning i omkostningerne ved at skaffe grossister.
Each brewery group thus acquired a large number of drinks wholesalers, leading to a strong inflation of the acquisition price of such wholesalers.
Den 21. marts 1996 indgik Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, Heineken France SA og deres respektive moderselskaber, Groupe Danone og Heineken NV, en »våbenhvileaftale« vedrørende kampen om grossisterne og afbalanceringen af deres integrerede net.
On 21 March 1996, Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, Heineken France SA and their respective mother companies, Groupe Danone and Heineken NV, therefore concluded an ‘armistice’ agreement regarding the acquisition of wholesalers and the balancing of their integrated distribution networks.
De enedes navnlig om følgende:
In particular, they agreed on:
et midlertidigt stop i kampen om grossisterne (forbud mod at forsøge at få grossister, der ikke var opført på en aftalt liste)
a temporary acquisition stop (prohibition to proceed with acquisitions of wholesalers outside an agreed list),
afbalancering af den samlede mængde øl, der blev distribueret gennem hver parts net
the balancing of the total volume of beer distributed through the network of each party, and
afbalancering af antallet af ølmærker, der markedsføres af hver part, og som bør fordeles af den anden part.
the balancing of the volume of beer brands commercialised by each party which should be distributed by the other party.
Det fremgår tydeligt af et internt notat i Heineken-koncernen, at der findes en sådan aftale.
The agreement is made clear from an internal note of the group Heineken.
Groupe Danone og Brasseries Kronenbourg SA har desuden ikke bestridt det.
Groupe Danone and Brasseries Kronenbourg SA have moreover not contested the existence of the armistice agreement.
Det skal imidlertid bemærkes, at Kommissionen ikke har bevis for, at aftalen er blevet gennemført.
It should however be noted that the Commission does not have any proof of implementation of the agreement.
Tværtimod blev visse grossister på den aftalte liste, der var tildelt den ene part, til sidst overtaget af den anden part, og parterne fortsatte med at kæmpe om grossister, der ikke var anført på den aftalte liste.
On the contrary, certain wholesalers indicated on the agreed list as attributed to one party have finally been acquired by the other party and the parties continued to acquire wholesalers outside the agreed list.
I perioden 1996-2002 havde parterne desuden tendens til at fortrænge deres konkurrenters øl ved hjælp af deres egen øl inden for det distributionsnet, der var under deres kontrol.
Moreover, in the period from 1996 to 2002, the parties tended to supplant their competitors’ beer by their own beer within the distribution network under their control.
En aftale, der skulle sikre balance mellem mærkerne, blev således meningsløs.
An agreement intended to ensure equilibrium between brands thus became pointless.
RETLIG VURDERING
LEGAL ASSESSMENT
Konkurrencebegrænsende formål
Restriction by subject
Formålet med »våbenhvileaftalen« af 21. marts 1996 var først og fremmest at kontrollere Heineken og Danone-koncernernes investeringer, da det var hensigten hurtigt at sætte en stopper for de stigende omkostninger ved kampen om grossisterne.
The ‘armistice’ agreement of 21 March 1996 was first intended to control investment by the Heineken and Danone groups, since its purpose was to bring about a rapid end to the rising cost of acquiring wholesalers.
Endvidere ligner aftalen en aftale, der havde til formål at dele udskænkningsmarkedet mellem de to koncerner.
Moreover, the agreement is akin to one whose purpose was to share the on trade-markets between the two groups.
Ved at etablere den dobbelte balance, der er omhandlet under punkt II ovenfor, ville parterne sikre, at den ene part ikke dominerede den anden på dette marked.
Indeed, by establishing the dual equilibrium mentioned in point 2.3 above, the parties were aiming to ensure that one party did not dominate the other on this market.
Det er fast retspraksis, at med henblik på anvendelsen af traktatens artikel 81, stk. 1, er det ikke nødvendigt at tage hensyn til de faktiske virkninger af en aftale, når det fremgår, at formålet hermed er at forebygge, begrænse eller fordreje konkurrencen på det fælles marked.
It is settled case-law that, for the purpose of applying Article 81(1), of the Treaty, there is no need to take account of the actual effects of an agreement once it appears that its aim is to prevent, restrict or distort competition within the common market.
Da den aftale, det drejer sig om i denne sag, havde til formål at begrænse konkurrencen ved at kræve et stop i kampen om grossister og skabe balance mellem partnernes integrerede net, konkluderer Kommissionen, at der er sket en overtrædelse i den betydning, der anvendes i traktatens artikel 81, selv om aftalen ikke havde den tilstræbte virkning.
Since the agreement at issue in this case had as its object the restriction of competition by requiring a freeze on acquisitions and by establishing equilibrium between the parties’ integrated distribution networks, the Commission concludes that there is an infringement within the meaning of article 81 of the Treaty even if the agreement did not produce any effects.
Væsentlige virkninger for handelen mellem medlemsstaterne
Appreciable effect on trade between Member States
Det er fast retspraksis, at for at en aftale mellem virksomheder kan påvirke handelen mellem medlemsstater, skal det være muligt på grundlag af en række objektive retlige eller faktuelle faktorer med en tilstrækkelig grad af sandsynlighed at forudse, at den direkte eller indirekte, reelt eller potentielt kan påvirke handelsmønstret mellem medlemsstater.
It is settled case-law that, in order that an agreement between undertakings may affect trade between Member States, it must be possible to envisage, with a sufficient degree of probability on the basis of a set of objective factors of law or fact that it may have an influence, direct or indirect, actual or potential, the pattern of trade between Member states.
Det er tilfældet her.
This is the case here.
De franske bryggeriers distributionsnet udgør en af de hovedmuligheder, udenlandske bryggerier, der ikke har sådanne net i Frankrig, har for at komme ind på markedet.
The distribution networks of the French breweries constitute one of the main means of access to the market for foreign breweries that do not have such networks in France.
Under disse forhold kan våbenhvileaftalen, der tager sigte på at skabe ligevægt på nationalt plan mellem Heineken NV/Heineken France SA's og Groupe Danone/Brasseries Kronenbourg SA's integrerede distributionsnet, påvirke udenlandske bryggeriers muligheder for at komme ind på udskænkningsmarkedet og derved importens størrelse.
Under these circumstances, the armistice agreement, which aims at establishing equilibrium at national level between the integrated distribution networks of Heineken NV/Heineken France SA and Groupe Danone/Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, could influence the conditions of access to the on-trade market for foreign breweries and thus the volume of importations.
Interbrew France, der er den største importør af øl i Frankrig, afhang og afhænger desuden stadig af Heineken France SA's og Brasseries Kronenbourg SA's distributionsnet for at distribuere store mængder af sin vare på udskænkningsmarkedet i Frankrig.
Moreover, Interbrew France, main importer of beer in France, depended and still depends on the distribution networks of Heineken France SA and Brasseries Kronenbourg SA to distribute an important volume of its product on the on-trade market in France.
En aftale, der tager sigte på at begrænse konkurrencen mellem sidstnævnte virksomheders distributionsnet, kan således påvirke de handelsvilkår, disse virksomheder tilbyder Interbrew France for at distribuere dets produkter.
An agreement that aims at restricting competition between the distribution networks of the latter companies could influence the commercial conditions which these companies propose to Interbrew France for the distribution of its products.
Kommissionen tager hensyn til i) overtrædelsens art, ii) den reelle virkning for markedet, når dette kan måles, og iii) størrelsen af det relevante geografiske marked.
The Commission takes into account: (i) the nature of the infringement; (ii) its actual impact on the market when this can be measured, and (iii) the size of the relevant geographic market.