natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Da ingen filippinske selskaber samarbejdede i forbindelse med den aktuelle undersøgelse, blev afgørelsen i overensstemmelse med grundforordningens artikel 18 baseret på de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger, herunder oplysninger i anmodningen.
Since no Philippine company cooperated in the present investigation, the assessment was based on information available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, including information provided in the request.
Ansøgeren fremlagde bevis for, at der både foregik videreforsendelse via og samleprocesser i Filippinerne.
The applicant provided prima facie evidence for both the existence of transhipment and of assembly operations in the Philippines.
Utilstrækkelig gyldig grund eller økonomisk begrundelse ud over indførelsen af antidumpingtolden
Insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the anti-dumping duty
Da der ikke blev udvist samarbejdsvilje, måtte Kommissionen basere sine undersøgelsesresultater på de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger, jf. grundforordningens artikel 18.
In the absence of any cooperation, the Commission had to base its findings on the facts available, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
I det aktuelle tilfælde indeholdt oplysningerne fra ansøgeren bevis for, at der forekom videreforsendelse og samleprocesser, der omgik de gældende antidumpingforanstaltninger.
In the present case, the information submitted by the applicant contained prima facie evidence of transhipment and assembly operations circumventing the anti-dumping measures in force.
Desuden er der et tidsmæssigt sammenfald mellem på den ene side indførelsen af antidumpingforanstaltningerne mod Kina og ændringen i eksporten fra Kina og på den anden side udviklingen i importen fra Filippinerne til Fællesskabet, jf. betragtning 37.
Moreover, there is a coincidence in time between the imposition of the anti-dumping measures on the PRC and the change in the export trends from China, on the one hand, and of the import trends from the Philippines to the Community, on the other hand, as mentioned in recital 37.
Da dette bekræftede de beviser, der allerede fandtes i anmodningen, konkluderedes det, at ændringen i handelsmønstret snarere skyldtes indførelsen af antidumpingforanstaltningerne end nogen anden gyldig grund eller økonomisk begrundelse, jf. grundforordningens artikel 13, stk. 1.
Since this confirmed the prima facie evidence already submitted in the request it was concluded that the change in the pattern of trade stemmed from the imposition of the anti-dumping measures rather than from any other due cause or economic justification within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Undergravning af antidumpingtoldens afhjælpende virkninger
Undermining of the remedial effect of the anti-dumping duty
Ændringen i mønstret for importen til Fællesskabet har fundet sted efter indførelsen af antidumpingforanstaltningerne mod importen af CFL-i fra Kina.
The change in the pattern of Community imports occurred after the imposition of the anti-dumping measures on imports of CFL-i from China.
Denne ændring i handelsstrømmene udmøntede sig i en væsentligt forøget import, der som nævnt i betragtning 36 steg med mere end 250 % mellem 2001 og undersøgelsesperioden.
This change in trade flows was translated in a significant increase in import volumes, i.e. as mentioned in recital 36 by over 250 % between 2001 and the IP.
Det konkluderedes derfor, at denne stigning i importmængden har undergravet de afhjælpende virkninger af antidumpingforanstaltningerne på fællesskabsmarkedet.
It was therefore concluded that this increase of imports in terms of quantities has undermined the remedial effects of the anti-dumping measures in the Community market.
Da de filippinske eksportører ikke samarbejdede, blev eksportpriserne for de varer, der afsendtes fra Filippinerne, fastsat på grundlag af Eurostats oplysninger, jf. grundforordningens artikel 18.
With regard to prices of the products consigned from the Philippines and in the absence of any cooperation from exporters in the Philippines, export prices were established on the basis of data recorded in Eurostat in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
De således fastsatte filippinske eksportpriser lå i gennemsnit under skadestærsklen for fællesskabspriserne som fastsat i den oprindelige undersøgelse.
On that basis, export prices from the Philippines were on average below the injury elimination level of Community prices as established in the original investigation.
Det konkluderedes derfor, at importen af den pågældende vare fra Filippinerne undergravede toldens afhjælpende virkninger i henseende til priser og mængder.
Therefore, it was concluded that the imports of the product concerned from the Philippines undermined the remedial effects of the duty in terms of prices and quantities.
Sammenligningen af den vejede gennemsnitlige normale værdi som fastsat i den oprindelige undersøgelse og det vejede gennemsnit af eksportpriserne som fastsat i betragtning 45 viste udtrykt i procent af cif-prisen, Fællesskabets grænse, ufortoldet, at der forekom dumping af den import af CFL-i, der afsendtes fra Filippinerne.
The comparison of the weighted average normal value as established in the original investigation and the weighted average of export prices as established under recital 45 during this IP, expressed as a percentage of the CIF price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, showed dumping for the imports of CFL-i consigned from the Philippines.
I betragtning af ovenstående konkluderedes det, at den endelige antidumpingtold på importen af CFL-i med oprindelse i Kina blev omgået ved forsendelse via Filippinerne, jf. grundforordningens artikel 13, stk. 1.
Given the above, it was concluded that the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of CFL-i originating in China was circumvented by transhipment via the Philippines pursuant to Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Det fremgik af undersøgelsen, at Ecopak Lighting havde et anlæg for produktion og samling af CFL-i i Pakistan.
The investigation revealed that Ecopak Lighting had a production/assembly facility for CFL-i in Pakistan.
Ecopak Lighting er forretningsmæssigt forbundet med et kinesisk selskab, som er omfattet af den gældende antidumpingtold, nemlig Firefly Lighting Co. Ltd.
Ecopak Lighting is related to a Chinese company subject to the definitive anti-dumping duty, namely Firefly Lighting Co. Ltd.
Ecopak Lighting blev registreret i begyndelsen af 2001 (under den oprindelige undersøgelse) og påbegyndte sin faktiske virksomhed i maj 2001 efter indførelsen af midlertidige foranstaltninger i den oprindelige undersøgelse.
Ecopak Lighting was registered at the beginning of 2001 (during the original investigation) and started actual operation in May 2001, after the imposition of provisional measures in the original investigation.
Maskiner og udstyr blev købt fra et handelsselskab i Kina.
Machinery and equipment were purchased from a trading company located in the PRC.
Overførslen af udstyr fra Kina til Pakistan begyndte i februar 2001, umiddelbart før indførelsen af midlertidige foranstaltninger i den oprindelige undersøgelse.
The transfer of equipment from the PRC to Pakistan started in February 2001, immediately prior to the imposition of provisional measures in the original investigation.
Det fremgik imidlertid af undersøgelsen, at Ecopak Lighting ikke begyndte at fremstille CFL-i i Pakistan, men kun foretog samleprocesser.
The investigation revealed, however, that Ecopak Lighting did not start the production of CFL-i in Pakistan, but only carried out assembly operations.
Der blev endda fundet bevis for, at dele til CFL-i blev fremstillet af det forretningsmæssigt forbundne selskab i Kina og importeret i delvist samlede »sæt«.
Indeed, evidence was found showing that CFL-i components were manufactured by the related company located in the PRC and imported in semi-assembled ‘kits’.
Desuden havde Ecopak Lighting ikke de nødvendige maskiner og udstyr, som ville have gjort det muligt for selskabet at producere CFL-i.
Furthermore, Ecopack Lighting did not have the necessary machinery and equipment, which would have allowed it to produce CFL-i.
På firmaets adresse i Pakistan fandtes der kun samlemaskiner.
At its premises in Pakistan, only assembly machinery was found.
Det skal bemærkes, at der under kontrolbesøget ikke foregik nogen aktiviteter (hverken produktion eller samling), der var intet personale til stede, og der var ingen lagerbeholdninger.
It should be noted that at the time of the verification visit, it was found that no activity (neither production nor assembly) was taking place, no personnel was present and no stocks existed.
Selskabet forklarede, at det — således som det især fremgik af maskinerne og en fremlagt personaleliste — havde udført samleprocesser i undersøgelsesperioden, men at det havde indstillet sine aktiviteter kort før indledningen af den aktuelle undersøgelse, og at det var endnu ikke afgjort, om aktiviteterne ville blive genoptaget.
The company explained that although they had assembly operations during the IP, as shown in particular by the machinery, and a personnel list which was provided, they had stopped the operations shortly before the initiation of the present investigation and had not decided yet whether or not they would restart the activity.
På dette grundlag kunne det ikke fastslås, at der fandtes en produktionskapacitet.
On this basis, the existence of a production capacity could not be established.
Det konstateredes endvidere, at Ecopak Lighting havde to sæt regnskaber.
Moreover, it was found that Ecopak Lighting had two sets of accounting documents.
Regnskaberne, og herunder revisionsrapporterne, var ikke i overensstemmelse med internationale standarder for regnskabsføring og ansås derfor for at være upålidelige.
The accounting records, including the reports of the auditors, were not in line with international accounting standards and were therefore considered unreliable.
Derfor kunne der ikke foretages en pålidelig ansættelse hverken af maskinernes værdi (nødvendig for beregningen af værditilvæksten), af de importerede deles nøjagtige værdi eller af værditilvæksten til disse dele.
As a result, a reliable value of the machinery (needed for the calculation of the depreciation to be included in the value added calculation) could not be assessed, nor the precise value of the imported parts or the value added to these parts.
Under alle omstændigheder afgav selskabet ingen oplysninger, der ville have gjort det muligt for institutionerne at undersøge de grænseværdier, der er omhandlet i artikel 13, stk. 2, litra b).
In any event, the company did not provide any information which would have enabled the Institutions to examine the thresholds mentioned in Article 13(2)(b).
I lyset af de foreliggende beviser (nemlig oplysningerne fra ansøgeren og det forhold, at næsten alle dele var importeret fra Kina i form af samlesæt fra et forretningsmæssigt forbundet selskab, der var omfattet af foranstaltninger) konkluderedes det, at de processer, der fandt sted i Pakistan i undersøgelsesperioden, burde betragtes som samleprocesser, der omgik den gældende endelige antidumpingtold.
In the light of the evidence available, i.e. the information submitted by the applicant and the fact that almost all parts were imported from the PRC in the form of kits from a related company subject to measures, it was concluded that the operations taking place in Pakistan during the IP should be considered as assembly operations circumventing the definitive anti–dumping duties in force.
Utilstrækkelig gyldig grund eller ingen økonomisk begrundelse ud over indførelsen af antidumpingtolden
Insufficient due cause or no economic justification other than the imposition of the anti-dumping duty
Undersøgelsen afslørede yderligere forhold, der bekræftede, at samleprocesserne i Pakistan ikke har anden grund eller økonomisk begrundelse end indførelsen af antidumpingtolden.
The investigation revealed further facts which confirmed that the assembly operations in Pakistan had no other due cause or economic justification than the imposition of the anti-dumping duty.
Den ovenfor beskrevne ændring i handelsmønstret faldt sammen med indledningen af samleprocesser for CFL-i i Pakistan.
The change described above in the pattern of trade coincided with the establishment of assembly operations of CFL-i in Pakistan.
Det konstateredes også, at mens salget af CFL-i til Fællesskabet fandt sted fra Pakistan, fortsatte det forretningsmæssigt forbundne kinesiske selskab med at levere til andre markeder direkte fra Kina.
It was also found that while sales of CFL-i to the Community were made from Pakistan, the Chinese related company continued supplying other markets directly from the PRC.
Ecopak Lightings kunder i Fællesskabet bestilte CFL-i direkte fra det forretningsmæssigt forbundne selskab i Kina.
Customers of Ecopak Lighting in the Community ordered CLF-i directly from the related company in China.
Eksportøren hævdede, at årsagen til, at der blev indledt aktiviteter i Pakistan, især var det gunstige klima for udenlandske investeringer, den forbedrede infrastruktur og de lave arbejdskraftomkostninger i Pakistan.
The exporter claimed that the reason for starting the operation in Pakistan was in particular the favourable environment for foreign investments, improved infrastructure and low labour costs in Pakistan.
Selskabet hævdede også, at fællesskabsmarkedet er anderledes end andre markeder med hensyn til efterspørgsel, varetyper og priser, som krævede en anden eksportstrategi end for andre markeder.
The company also claimed that the Community market is different from other markets with regard to demand, product types and prices which required a different export strategy than for other markets.
Ingen af disse argumenter kunne imidlertid støttes med tilstrækkelig dokumentation, og selskabet kunne ikke påvise, at der var taget hensyn til disse faktorer, da beslutningen om at starte aktiviteterne i Pakistan blev truffet.
However, none of these arguments could be supported by sufficient evidence and the company could not show that these factors were taken into consideration at the time of the decision to start the operation in Pakistan.
Resultaterne af kontrolbesøget var faktisk i kraftig modstrid med selskabets erklæringer.
Indeed the results of the on-the-spot verification strongly contradicted the company’s statements.
Selskabet kunne heller ikke give en rimelig begrundelse for, at aktiviteterne var blevet afbrudt.
Furthermore, as regards the interruption of the activity, the company was not able to provide a reasonable explanation.
Under alle omstændigheder bemærkes det, at selskabet meget let kan genoptage sine samleprocesser, hvis det måtte beslutte sig herfor.
In any event, it is noted that the company could restart its assembly operations very easily, if it decided to do so.
I betragtning af ovenstående, og da selskabet også selv indrømmede, at samleprocessen var blevet indledt som følge af antidumpingtolden i Fællesskabet, konkluderedes det, at der ikke var anden gyldig grund eller økonomisk begrundelse for ændringen i handelsmønstret end indførelsen af antidumpingtolden.
Given the above and since the company also admitted itself that the assembly operation started due to the anti-dumping duties in place in the Community, it was concluded that there was insufficient due cause and no economic justification for the change in the pattern of trade other than the imposition of the anti-dumping duty.
Analysen af handelsstrømmen på grundlag af tal fra Eurostat viser, at den ændring i mønstret for importen til Fællesskabet, der har fundet sted efter indførelsen af endelige foranstaltninger mod importen med oprindelse i Kina, har undergravet de afhjælpende virkninger af antidumpingforanstaltningerne i henseende til de mængder, der importeres til fællesskabsmarkedet.
The trade flow analysis on the basis of the Eurostat data shows that the change in the pattern of Community imports, which occurred after the imposition of definitive measures on imports originating in China, has undermined the remedial effects of the anti-dumping measures in terms of quantities imported into the Community market.
Det pakistanske selskab havde endog en væsentligt større eksport til Fællesskabet i undersøgelsesperioden i den aktuelle undersøgelse, end det forretningsmæssigt forbundne kinesiske selskab havde haft i undersøgelsesperioden i den oprindelige undersøgelse.
Indeed, the Pakistani company even exported significantly more to the Community during the IP of this investigation than its related company in China had done during the investigation period of the original investigation.
For så vidt angår priserne på den fra Pakistan afsendte vare konstateredes det, at priserne ved salg til uafhængige kunder i Fællesskabet ligger under den skadestærskel, der blev fastsat for fællesskabsproducenterne i den oprindelige undersøgelse.
With regard to the prices of the product consigned from Pakistan, it was found that the prices to unrelated customers in the Community were below the injury elimination level established for Community producers in the original investigation.
Det konkluderedes derfor, at importen af den pågældende vare fra Pakistan undergravede toldens afhjælpende virkninger i henseende til priser og mængder.
Therefore, it was concluded that the imports from Pakistan of the product concerned undermined the remedial effects of the duty in terms of prices and quantities.
Det fremgik af en sammenligning af den vejede gennemsnitlige normale værdi som fastsat i den oprindelige undersøgelse og de vejede gennemsnitlige eksportpriser i undersøgelsesperioden for den aktuelle undersøgelse, udtrykt i procent af cif-prisen, Fællesskabets grænse, ufortoldet, som blev foretaget i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 11 og 12, at der forekom dumping i forbindelse med importen af CFL-i afsendt fra Pakistan.
In accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, a comparison of the weighted average normal value as established in the original investigation and the weighted average of export prices during this investigation’s IP, expressed as a percentage of the CIF price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, showed dumping for the imports of CFL-i consigned from Pakistan.
Anmodningen indeholdt tilstrækkelige beviser for, at de gældende antidumpingforanstaltninger blev omgået ved videreforsendelse og samling af importerede varer afsendt fra Vietnam.
The request contained sufficient prima facie evidence of the existence of circumvention practices by means of transhipment and assembly of the anti-dumping measures in force by imports consigned in Vietnam.
Fire eksportører og producenter i Vietnam besvarede spørgeskemaet.
Four exporters/producers in Vietnam submitted a reply to the questionnaire.
Der blev aflagt kontrolbesøg, hos tre af disse.
On-the-spot verifications were carried out at the premises of three of them.
Det fjerde selskab (Halong Simexco) tillod ikke et kontrolbesøg, og dets besvarelse af spørgeskemaet måtte derfor anses for upålidelig.
The fourth company (Halong Simexco) did not allow for an on-the-spot verification and therefore its reply to the questionnaire had to be considered unreliable.
Konklusionerne for dette selskab blev baseret på de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger, jf. grundforordningens artikel 18.
Findings with regard to this company were based on facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
På dette grundlag konkluderedes det, at der ikke var grund til at antage, at dette selskabs aktiviteter ikke udgjorde omgåelse som defineret i grundforordningens artikel 13.
On this basis it was concluded that there was no reason to believe that the operations of this company did not constitute circumvention as defined in Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
For så vidt angår de øvrige tre selskaber havde de alle etableret samle- og produktionsanlæg for CFL-i i Vietnam.
As regards the remaining three companies, all established assembly/production lines of CFL-i in Vietnam.
Imidlertid eksporterede kun et af selskaberne (Eco Industries Vietnam) den pågældende vare til Fællesskabet i undersøgelsesperioden.
However, only one of them exported the product concerned to the Community during the IP (Eco Industries Vietnam).
Energy Research Vietnam begyndte at eksportere efter undersøgelsesperioden og anmodede derfor om at blive indrømmet fritagelse som ny eksportør på grundlag af artikel 11, stk. 4, og artikel 13, stk. 4, i grundforordningen.
Energy Research Vietnam started exporting after the IP, and therefore requested to be granted an exemption as a newcomer on the basis of Articles 11(4) and 13(4) of the basic Regulation.
Endelig havde Rang Dong Light Source and Vacuum Flask Joint Stock Company (»Ralaco«) slet ikke eksporteret den pågældende vare, hverken i undersøgelsesperioden eller senere.
Finally, Rang Dong Light Source and Vacuum Flask Joint Stock Company (Ralaco) did not export the product concerned at all during the IP or after this period.
For dette selskab kunne der derfor ikke drages nogen konklusion om, hvorvidt den endelige antidumpingtold blev omgået eller ej.
With regard to this company, no conclusions could therefore be drawn as to whether definitive anti-dumping duties were being circumvented or not.
Dette selskabs situation vil blive taget op til fornyet undersøgelse, hvis betingelserne i artikel 11, stk. 4, og artikel 13, stk. 4, opfyldes.
The situation of this company will be reviewed upon request in cases where the conditions of Articles 11(4) and 13(4) are fulfilled.
Et af de i betragtning 65 omhandlede selskaber, Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd, der ikke foretog eksport til Fællesskabet i undersøgelsesperioden, begyndte imidlertid at eksportere CFL-i efter undersøgelsesperioden og anmodede derfor om at blive behandlet som ny eksportør, jf. grundforordningens artikel 11, stk. 4, og artikel 13, stk. 4.
One of the companies mentioned in recital 65, Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd, which did not export to the Community during the IP, started, however, exporting CFL-i after the IP and therefore requested to be treated as a newcomer in accordance with Articles 13(4) and 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Det var imidlertid vanskeligt at kontrollere dette selskabs besvarelse af spørgeskemaet, bl.a. fordi der var afgivet misvisende oplysninger (f.eks. skjultes eksistensen af et lager af den pågældende vare, der var solgt til Fællesskabet), og de afgivne oplysninger måtte derfor betragtes som upålidelige.
The verification of this company’s questionnaire reply was, however, significantly impeded by, inter alia, the submission of misleading information (for instance hiding the existence of a stock of the product concerned sold to the Community), and the information submitted thus had to be considered as unreliable.
Desuden udelod Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd oplysninger om virksomhedens køb af et vietnamesisk selskab, som ansøgeren i anmodningen havde dokumenteret foretog omgåelse.
Moreover, Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd omitted information concerning its purchase of a Vietnamese company for which the applicant submitted prima facie evidence of circumvention practices in the request.
Endelig tillod Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd ikke, at der blev aflagt kontrolbesøg hos dets moderselskab i Hongkong, selv om det hævdede, at de fleste dokumenter af relevans for undersøgelsen befandt sig hos dette selskab.
Finally, Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd did not allow an on-the-spot verification visit at the premises of its parent company in Hong Kong although it claimed that most of the documents relevant for the investigation would be located at that company.
I betragtning af ovenstående blev det konkluderet, at Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd ikke udviste samarbejdsvilje, og undersøgelsesresultaterne for selskabet måtte derfor baseres på de foreliggende faktiske oplysninger.
Given the above, it was concluded that Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd could not be considered as a cooperating party, and therefore the findings related to the company had to be made on the basis of the facts available.