natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En eksporterende producent, der blev indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling, og som deltog i stikprøven, hævdede, at de justeringer, der efter grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra i), blev foretaget af selskabets salg til Fællesskabet via dets datterselskab etableret i et tredjeland, ikke var berettigede, da det pågældende datterselskab blot fungerede som en eksportsalgsafdeling.
One sampled exporting producer which was granted MET claimed that the adjustments made pursuant to Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation with respect to its sales to the Community via its subsidiary established in a third country was not warranted since the subsidiary in question merely performed the functions of an export sales department.
Den pågældende producent hævdede også, at, hvis der alligevel blev foretaget en justering, burde den under alle omstændigheder være begrænset til, hvad der ville være en normal provision betalt til ikke-forbundne agenter.
It further claimed that if nevertheless an adjustment is made, it should in any event be limited to a normal commission rate paid to unrelated agents.
To andre eksporterende producenter hævdede også, at justeringen burde begrænses til de direkte salgsudgifter.
Two other exporting producers also claimed that the adjustment should be limited to direct selling expenses.
I den henseende viste undersøgelsen, at de funktioner, det pågældende salgsdatterselskab varetog, var mere vidtgående end dem, som en eksportørs eksportsalgsafdeling typisk varetager, og at de snarere burde sammenlignes med dem, der varetages af en agent, der arbejder på provisionsbasis, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra i).
In this respect, the investigation revealed that the functions discharged by the sales subsidiary concerned were going beyond those typically assumed by an exporter’s export sales department, and should rather be compared to those left to an agent working on a commission basis, in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Den forbundne part anses derfor for at have haft omkostninger, som faktisk reducerer de beløb, eksportørerne modtager, og som således bør trækkes fra den pris, den første uafhængige køber i Fællesskabet betaler.
It is therefore considered that the related party incurred costs which effectively reduce the amounts received by the exporters, and which should thus be deducted from the price paid by the first independent buyer in the Community.
Det skal bemærkes, at de to andre eksporterende producenter, der befinder sig i samme situation som ovennævnte producent, delte Kommissionens synspunkt om, at der burde foretages en justering efter grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra i), for at få en rimelig sammenligning (jf. betragtning (51)).
It is noted that the two other exporting producers who are in the same situation as the exporting producer above shared the Commission’s view that an adjustment should be made pursuant to Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation for the purpose of a fair comparison (see recital (51) above).
Desuden anses justeringsbeløbet for at være behørigt beregnet i overensstemmelse med artikel 2, stk. 10, litra i), dvs. på grundlag af den avance, det forbundne selskab modtager.
Finally, it is considered that the amount of the adjustment was duly calculated in conformity with the provisions of Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of the mark-up received by the related company.
Avancen blev i dette tilfælde beregnet som de forbundne selskabers faktiske SGA-omkostninger plus en rimelig fortjeneste og bør ikke begrænses udelukkende til de direkte salgsudgifter.
The mark-up in this case was calculated as being the actual selling, general and administrative costs of the related companies and a reasonable amount of profit, and should not be limited to only direct selling expenses.
De eksporterende producenters påstande blev derfor afvist.
The claims made by the exporting producers concerned were therefore rejected.
Flere af de interesserede parter hævdede, at justeringen for ikke-refunderet moms var uberettiget og baseret på en fejlagtig forståelse af systemet.
Various interested parties claimed that the adjustment related to the non-refunded VAT was unwarranted and based on an erroneous understanding of the system.
Andre eksporterende producenter, herunder en, der var enig i justeringsprincippet, bestred den metode, der var anvendt til at beregne justeringen, og forlangte, at justeringen skulle baseres på det faktiske ikke-refunderede momsbeløb.
Some other exporting producers, including one which agreed with the principle of the adjustment, contested the methodology used to compute the adjustment and requested that the adjustment be based on the actual amount of non-refundable VAT.
Den første påstand afvistes, fordi den ikke var behørigt begrundet, og der ikke blev fremlagt andre oplysninger, der kunne bekræfte, at justeringen er baseret på en fejlagtig forståelse.
The first claim was rejected because it was not substantiated and no further elements were provided that would confirm the fact that the adjustment is based on an erroneous understanding.
Hvad angår påstanden om, at de faktiske beløb burde anvendes, blev disse i mange tilfælde ikke oplyst af de berørte eksporterende producenter eller ikke underbygget med tilstrækkelige beviser, og de kunne derfor ikke tages i betragtning.
As regards the claim that the actual amounts should be used, those were in many instances either not submitted by the exporting producers concerned or not adequately supported by evidence and could therefore not be taken into consideration.
Efter bemærkninger fra en række parter præciseres det, at de priser for samme produkttyper solgt på hjemmemarkedet i Tyrkiet, som blev anvendt til at fastsætte den normale værdi, om nødvendigt blev justeret for at sikre en rimelig sammenligning med de produkttyper, som de berørte kinesiske producenter eksporterede til Fællesskabet, jf. grundforordningens artikel 2, stk. 10, litra a).
Following comments made by several parties, it is hereby clarified that, where necessary, the prices for the like product types sold on the domestic market in Turkey, which were used for the determination of the normal value, were adjusted so as to ensure a fair comparison with those product types exported to the Community by the Chinese producers concerned, in accordance with Article 2(10)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Disse justeringer blev foretaget på grundlag af et rimeligt skøn over forskellenes markedsværdi.
Those adjustments were made on the basis of a reasonable estimate of the market value of the differences.
For to selskaber måtte den justering, der blev foretaget i den midlertidige fase, revideres, så den bedre kom til at afspejle deres individuelle situation, og de relevante margener revideredes tilsvarende.
In the case of two companies, the adjustment made at provisional stage had to be revised so as to better reflect their individual situation and the relevant margins were revised accordingly.
To af de tre selskaber, der blev indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling, hævdede, at den forbindelse, der blev konstateret mellem dem i undersøgelsesperioden, ikke længere afspejler den reelle situation, da aktionærforbindelsen mellem alle tre selskaber kort efter undersøgelsesperioden ophævedes, fordi alle de pågældende aktier blev solgt til uafhængige personer.
Two of the three companies which were granted MET claimed that their established relationship during the IP no longer reflects reality, on the grounds that, shortly after the IP, the shareholders link between all three companies has been removed since all shares concerned have been sold to independent persons.
Selskaberne hævdede derfor, at der burde tages hensyn til denne nye situation, og at hvert af selskaberne, da de ikke længere kan betragtes som forbundne, bør tildeles en individuel dumpingmargen, der afspejler dets egen situation.
The companies therefore claimed that this new situation should be taken into consideration and that, since they can no longer be considered as related, each company should be attributed an individual dumping margin reflecting its own situation.
Undersøgelsen viste imidlertid, at forbindelsen mellem de pågældende selskaber i undersøgelsesperioden faktisk bestod af mere end blot en aktionærforbindelse.
The investigation revealed, however, that the relationship between the companies concerned during the IP actually consisted of more than just a shareholding link.
Det konstateredes, at de tre selskaber ud over denne forbindelse også havde fælles bestyrelsesmedlemmer.
It was indeed established that in addition to that link, the three companies also shared members of their respective board of directors.
Dette forhold forstærkede den forbindelse, der bestod i kraft af aktionærforbindelsen.
The presence of shared directors between the companies therefore reinforced the relationship that existed through the shareholding link.
Det konstateredes derfor, at selskaberne måtte betragtes som forbundne i undersøgelsesperioden.
For those reasons, it was found that the companies had to be considered as being related during the IP.
Selv om situationen angiveligt ændredes kort efter undersøgelsesperioden, ville det under alle omstændigheder være for tidligt at konkludere, at disse ændringer er af varig karakter.
Even if the situation has allegedly changed shortly after the IP, it would in any event be too early to conclude that these changes are of a lasting nature.
I betragtning af arten af den forbindelse, der konstateredes i undersøgelsesperioden, kan det ikke udelukkes, at der er risiko for omgåelse gennem det selskab, der pålægges den laveste told.
In view of the nature of the established relationship during the IP, the risk of circumvention through the company with the lowest duty imposed cannot be excluded.
Det skal også bemærkes, at mens forbindelsen kan have påvirket resultaterne for undersøgelsesperioden, kan eventuelle ændringer i forbindelsen efter undersøgelsesperioden ikke betragtes som relevante.
Moreover, it is also noted that since this relationship may have affected the findings for the IP, any changes in the relationship after the IP cannot be considered as relevant.
Det konkluderes derfor, at selskabernes påstande bør afvises.
It is therefore concluded that the claims made by the companies should be rejected.
Forskellige interesserede parter bestred også, at bestemmelserne om stikprøver var anvendt korrekt.
Furthermore, various interested parties contested the correct use of the provisions on sampling.
Da de tre selskaber, som blev indrømmet markedsøkonomisk behandling, og som deltog i stikprøven, konstateredes at være forbundne, hævdes det, at de udgør en enkelt enhed, og at deres dumpingmargen derfor ikke kan lægges til grund for et gyldigt gennemsnit efter grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 6.
Since the three sampled companies granted MET were found to be related, it is claimed that they form one single entity and that therefore their dumping margin cannot constitute a valid average in view of the wording of Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Det skyldes, at denne artikel omhandler den vejede gennemsnitlige dumpingmargen, der er fastsat for parterne i stikprøven, hvorfor dumpingmargenen nødvendigvis må baseres på resultaterne for mere end ét selskab.
This is based on the fact that this Article refers to the weighted average margin of dumping established for the parties in the sample, thus the dumping margin should necessarily be based on the findings for more than one company.
Der blev henvist til WTO-appelinstansens rapport i forbindelse med EF-Indien-sengelinnedsagen [3], hvori det konkluderedes, at det vejede gennemsnit nødvendigvis måtte referere til mere end ét selskab.
Reference was made to the WTO Appellate Body report, in the framework of the EC-India bed linen case [3], where it was concluded that the weighted average should necessarily refer to more than one company.
Hertil skal det bemærkes, at appelinstansens konklusioner, der blev fremsat i en anden sammenhæng, nemlig i forbindelse med antidumpingaftalens (ADA) artikel 2.2.2 (ii), og en anden sag, ikke kan anvendes direkte i den foreliggende specifikke sag.
In this respect, it should be noted that the conclusions of the Appellate Body, which were made in a different context, namely that of Article 2.2.2 (ii) of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, and a different case, are not directly applicable in this specific case.
For det andet bør argumentet afvises, fordi det vejede gennemsnit af stikprøven i denne sag er baseret på hvert selskabs egen normale værdi og eksportpriser, og disse selskaber ikke udgør en enkelt enhed.
Secondly, the argument should be rejected because in the present case, the weighted average of the sample is based on each company’s own normal value and export prices, and those companies do not constitute one single entity.
Først da de tre individuelle margener var fastsat, blev der beregnet et vejet gennemsnit af disse margener for de forbundne selskaber for at undgå, at selskaberne i betragtning af deres indbyrdes forbindelse kanaliserer al deres eksport gennem det selskab, som der blev fastsat den laveste dumpingmargen for.
It is only after establishing the three individual margins that a weighted average of those margins was calculated for the related companies in order to avoid that, in view of their relationship, the companies channel all their exports via the company for which the lowest dumping margin was established.
Det skal også bemærkes, at grundforordningens artikel 9, stk. 6, ikke specifikt udelukker anvendelse af dumpingmargener, der er fastsat for forbundne parter i stikprøven.
It is further noted that Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation does not specifically exclude the use of margins of dumping established for related parties in the sample.
Da der ikke er fremsat bemærkninger hertil, bekræftes den metode, der blev anvendt til fastsættelse af dumpingmargenerne for de selskaber, der blev indrømmet individuel behandling, jf. betragtning (57) i den midlertidige forordning.
In the absence of comments, the methodology used to establish the dumping margins with respect to the companies that were granted IT, as laid down in recital (57) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
På grundlag af ovenstående udgør de endelige dumpingmargener følgende i procent af cif-prisen, Fællesskabets grænse, ufortoldet:
On the basis of the above, the definitive dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are:
Endelig dumpingmargen
Definitive dumping margin
Da der ikke er fremsat nogen bemærkninger hertil, bekræftes resultaterne i betragtning (59)-(61) i den midlertidige forordning.
In the absence of any comments, the findings of the recitals (59) to (61) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat nogen bemærkninger hertil, bekræftes de foreløbige resultater vedrørende den samlede produktion i Fællesskabet, jf. betragtning (62) og (63) i den midlertidige forordning.
In the absence of any comments submitted, the provisional findings concerning the total Community production as set out in recitals (62) to (63) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
En af de interesserede parter hævdede, at der ikke var tilstrækkelig støtte fra en betydelig del af producenterne i Fællesskabet.
One interested party claimed that there was not enough support from a major proportion of the Community production.
Den pågældende part anførte, at ét selskab var gået konkurs under undersøgelsen og derfor ikke burde tages i betragtning ved definitionen af erhvervsgrenen i Fællesskabet.
They argued that one company had gone bankrupt during the investigation and should, therefore, not be taken into account for the definition of the Community industry.
Parten hævdede desuden, at én af producenterne importerede det pågældende produkt i den betragtede periode og burde udelukkes fra erhvervsgrenen i Fællesskabet i henhold til grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 1, litra a).
Furthermore, they claimed that one producer imported the product concerned during the period considered and should be excluded from Community industry according to Article 4(1)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Det skal bemærkes, at en producent i Fællesskabet er i betalingsstandsning, men havde en produktion i gang i undersøgelsesperioden og i øjeblikket fortsætter sin produktion.
It has to be noted that one Community producer is under judicial administration, but was producing during the investigation period and is currently still operating its production.
Dette selskab blev derfor medtaget i definitionen af erhvervsgrenen i Fællesskabet.
Therefore, this company was included in the definition of the Community industry.
Undersøgelsen bekræftede, at intet selskab, der blev medregnet til erhvervsgrenen i Fællesskabet, importerede det pågældende produkt i undersøgelsesperioden.
The investigation confirmed that no company included in the Community industry imported the product concerned in the IP.
Nogle importerede imidlertid det grå produkt, dvs. råvaren til FSEP.
They did, however import the grey product, i.e. the raw material for the FPFF.
Disse argumenter bør derfor afvises.
These arguments should, therefore, be dismissed.
Da der ikke er fremsat yderligere bemærkninger hertil, bekræftes definitionen af erhvervsgrenen i Fællesskabet, jf. betragtning (64) i den midlertidige forordning.
In the absence of any further comments, the definition of Community industry as set out in recital (64) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat nogen bemærkninger hertil, bekræftes beregningen af forbruget i Fællesskabet, jf. betragtning (65) og (66) i den midlertidige forordning.
In the absence of any comments, the calculation of Community consumption as set out in recitals (65) to (66) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat nogen bemærkninger hertil, bekræftes beregningen af den pågældende imports omfang og markedsandel, jf. betragtning (67) og (68) i den midlertidige forordning.
In the absence of any comments, the calculation of volume and market share of the imports concerned as set out in recitals (67) and (68) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat nogen bemærkninger hertil, bekræftes beregningen af prisen og underbuddet for den pågældende import, jf. betragtning (69)-(71) i den midlertidige forordning.
In the absence of any comments, the calculation of prices and undercutting of the imports concerned as set out in recitals (69) to (71) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
EF-erhvervsgrenens situation
Situation of the Community Industry
I betragtning (98) i den midlertidige forordning konkluderede Kommissionen foreløbigt, at EF-erhvervsgrenen havde lidt væsentlig skade, jf. artikel 3 i grundforordningen.
It is recalled that in recital (98) of the provisional Regulation, the Commission provisionally concluded that the Community industry had suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3 of the basic Regulation.
Ingen af de interesserede parter satte spørgsmålstegn ved de tal vedrørende EF-erhvervsgrenens situation eller den fortolkning af dem, der var anført i betragtning (72)-(98) i den midlertidige forordning.
No interested party questioned the figures or their interpretation relating to the situation of the Community industry as presented in recitals (72) to (98) of the provisional Regulation.
Resultaterne som anført i disse betragtninger i den midlertidige forordning bekræftes derfor, og det konkluderes, at EF-erhvervsgrenen har lidt væsentlig skade, jf. artikel 3 i grundforordningen.
Therefore, the findings as set out in these recitals of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed and it is concluded that the Community industry has suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3 of the basic Regulation.
Foruden de andre faktorer, der blev undersøgt i den midlertidige forordning, undersøgtes også EF-erhvervsgrenens eksportresultater.
In addition to the other factors examined in the provisional Regulation, the export performance of the Community industry was also examined.
Det konstateredes, at EF-erhvervsgrenens eksportsalg i hele perioden holdt sig stabilt på ca. 25 mio. løbende meter.
In this respect, it was found that exports sales of the Community industry remained stable for the whole period at around 25 million running metres.
Det skal bemærkes, at denne eksport gælder den vare, der anvendes til for, og som sælges til en betydeligt lavere pris.
It is to be noted that these exports refer to the product used for lining, sold at a notably lower price.
Samtidig blev det produktsortiment, som hele EU-25-erhvervsgrenen eksporterede, i undersøgelsesperioden solgt til en pris, der var ca. 270 % højere end for importen fra Kina.
In parallel, the product mix exported by the whole EU-25 industry was sold, during the IP at a price 270 % higher than imports from China.
Under alle omstændigheder blev kun salget på fællesskabsmarkedet taget i betragtning ved beregningen af tal for fortjenesten, således at disse ikke er påvirket af eksportresultaterne.
In any event, only the sales made on the Community market were taken into consideration for the establishment of profitability data, so that these data are not influenced by export performance.
Af ovennævnte grunde kan det konkluderes, at Fællesskabets eksport ikke påførte EF-erhvervsgrenen skade.
For the reasons set out above, it can be concluded that the Community exports did not cause injury to the Community industry.
For importen fra alle andre tredjelande tilsammen var priserne desuden gennemsnitligt set konstant højere end de kinesiske priser.
Furthermore, concerning imports from all other third countries taken together, prices were constantly, on average, higher than prices from PRC.
På grundlag af ovenstående, og da der ikke er fremsat bemærkninger til årsagssammenhængen, bekræftes konklusionen i betragtning (99)-(111) i den midlertidige forordning.
On the basis of the above, and in the absence of any comments in respect to causation, the conclusion drawn in (99) to (111) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Da der ikke er fremsat bemærkninger vedrørende EF-erhvervsgrenens og andre EF-producenters interesser, bekræftes resultaterne som anført i betragtning (112)-(118) i den midlertidige forordning.
In the absence of any comments with respect to the interest of the Community industry and to other Community producers, the findings as set out in recitals (112) to (118) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Der indkom en række bemærkninger fra uafhængige importører og importører/brugere.
Several submissions from unrelated importers and importers/users were received.
Der fandt også en høring sted af de parter, der anmodede om en sådan.
Hearings were also granted to those parties who so requested.
Importørernes argumenter var sammenfaldende med brugernes og omtales i betragtning (87)-(90).
The arguments of the importers coincided with those of the users and are discussed under recitals (87) to (90) below.
Det skal bemærkes, at den samlede mængde, som de importører, der gav sig til kende, importerede fra Kina, er ubetydelig og kun tegner sig for ca. 2 % af den samlede import fra Kina i undersøgelsesperioden.
It is to be noted that the overall quantities imported from China by the importers who made themselves known are negligible and account only for around 2 % of the total imports from China during the IP.
De resterende 98 % reagerede ikke på foranstaltningerne.
The remainder 98 % did not react to the measures.
Da der ikke er fremsat andre bemærkninger vedrørende uafhængige importørers interesser, bekræftes resultaterne som anført i betragtning (119)-(121) i den midlertidige forordning.
In the absence of any other comments with respect to the interest of the unrelated importers, the findings as set out in recitals (119) to (121) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.