natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bortset fra udgifter i tilknytning til dækningsdifferencen.
Excluding the cost associated with the coverage differential.
Stk. 1 og 3 i klausul 19 i den nye public service-aftale.
Clause 19(1) and (3) of the New Public Service Contract.
Den nye public service-aftale fastlægger, at udgifter til drift af RTP 2 vil kunne kompenseres med tilbagevirkende kraft fra den 1.1.1996.
The New Public Service Contract provided that the operating costs of RTP 2 could be compensated for retroactively from 1 January 1996.
Selv om Sport TV ikke er en public service-aktivitet, der er berettiget til kompensationsbetaling, trak RTP overskuddet fra Sport TV fra udgifterne i forbindelse med public service.
Although Sport TV is not a public service activity eligible for compensation, RTP deducted the profits of Sport TV from the public service cost.
Grundlaget herfor er artikel 47, stk. 3, i lov nr. 32-A/98 af 14. juli 1998, som fastlægger, at RTP's overskud fra drift eller deltagelse i andre kanaler skal tjene til finansiering af public service-aktiviteter.
The basis for this is Article 47(3) of Law No 31-A/98 of 14 July 1998, which provides that profits made by RTP from participation in other channels are to be used for the financing of public service initiatives.
Sag T-46/97, SIC mod Kommissionen, Sml. 2000 II, s. 2125.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 May 2000 in Case T-46/97 SIC v Commission [2000] ECR II-2125.
NN 141/95, Finansiering af Radiotelevisão Portuguesa (EFT C 67 af 4.3.1997, s. 10).
NN 141/95 Financing of the Portuguese public television service (OJ C 67, 4.3.1997, p. 10).
Lovdekret nr. 91/A/77 trak RTP's vedtægter fra 1976 tilbage og fastlagde, at RTP skulle overgå til at blive forvaltet af en administrativ kommission.
Decree-Law No 91/A/77 annulled the 1976 Statutes of RTP and stipulated that RTP would be governed by an Administrative Council.
Med henvisning til sag C-53/00, Ferring, Sml 2001 I, s. 9067.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2001 in Case C-53/00 Ferring SA v Agence centrale des organismes de sécurité sociale (ACOSS), [2001] ECR I-9067.
Klausul 3 og 4 i public service-aftalen af 31.12.1996.
Clauses 3 and 4 of the New Public Service Contract.
I henhold til klausul 14 i public service-aftalen fra 1993 og klausul 21, stk. 3, i public service-aftalen fra 1996: »deltagelse i nævnte investeringer sker fortrinsvis fra førstekontrahentens side i dennes egenskab af aktionær i form af kapitalforhøjelse.«
According to Clause 14 of the Old Public Service Contract and Clause 21(3) of the New Public Service Contract, ‘Participation in the above-mentioned investments shall be covered preferably by the first contracting party and as shareholder in the form of an increase in capital’.
Punkt 10 i meddelelse fra Kommissionen om anvendelsen af statsstøttereglerne på foranstaltninger vedrørende direkte beskatning af virksomhederne (EFT C 384 af 10.12.1998, s. 3).
Point 10 of the Commission notice on the application of the state aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation (OJ C 384, 10.12.1998, p. 3).
I denne henseende henvises til definitionen på en offentlig virksomhed i henhold til artikel 2, stk. 1, litra b), i Kommissionens direktiv 2000/52/EF af 26. juli 2000 om gennemskueligheden af de økonomiske forbindelser mellem medlemsstaterne og de offentlige virksomheder (EFT L 193 af 29.7.2000, s. 75).
See in this respect the definition of a public undertaking given in Article 2(1)(b) of Commission Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 amending Directive 80/72 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings (OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 75).
Se sag T-358/94, Compagnie nationale Air France mod Kommissionen, Sml. 1996 II, s. 2109.
See judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 December 1996 in Case T-358/94 Compagnie Nationale Air France v Commission.
Se sag C-342/96, Spanien mod Kommissionen, Sml. 1999 I, s. 2459, præmis 46.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 29 April 1999 in Case C-342/96 Kingdom of Spain v Commission [1999] ECR I-0000, paragraph 46.
Sag C-342/96, præmis 48.
Ibidem, paragraph 48.
Se sag C-482/99, Frankrig mod Kommissionen, Sml. 2002 II, s. 4397.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 16 May 2002 in Case C-482/99 Republic of France v Commission.
Kommissionen anmodede om specifikke oplysninger om de indikatorer, som Domstolen fastlagde i sag nr. 482/99 i brev af 16.6.2003.
By letter of 16 June 2003, the Commission specifically requested information on the indicators given by the Court of Justice in Case C-482/99.
Se sag 70/85, Van Der Kooy mod Kommissionen, Sml. 1985, s. 219, præmis 37.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 2 February 1988 in joined cases 67, 68, and 70/85 Kwekerij Gebroeders van Der Kooy v Commission [1988] ECR 219, paragraph 37.
Domstolens dom i forenede sager C-159/91 og C 160/91, Poucet mod Assurances générales de France et Caisse mutuelle régionale du Languedoc-Roussillon, Sml. 1993 I, s. 637.
Judgment by the Court of Justice of 17 February 1993 in Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Christian Poucet v Assurances Générales de France and Caisse Mutuelle Régionale du Languedoc-Roussillon [[1993] ECR I-637.
Se sag C-295/97, Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio SpA mod International Factors Italia SpA (Ifitalia), Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH et Ministero della Difesa, Sml. 1999 I, s. 3735, præmis 35.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 June 1999 in Case C-295/97 Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio SpA v International Factors Italia SpA (Ifitalia), Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH and Ministero della Difesa [1999] ECR I-3735, paragraph 35.
Se punkt 1.2 i meddelelse fra Kommissionen om anvendelsen af EF-traktatens artikel 87 og 88 angående statsstøtte i form af garantier (EFT C 71 af 11.3.2000, s. 14).
See point 1.2 of the Commission notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to state aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 71, 11.3.2000, p. 14).
Som også anført i artikel 4, stk. 3, litra l), i lov nr. 21/92, i klausul 5, stk. 1, litra j), i public service-aftalen fra 1993 og klausul 7, stk. 1, litra m), i public service-aftalen fra 1996.
As laid down in Article 4(3)(l) of Law No 21/92, in Clause 5(1)(j) of the Old Public Service Contract and in Clause 7(1)(m) of the New Public Service Contract.
Artikel 5 i lov nr. 21/92.
Article 5 of Law No 21/92.
Brev fra de portugisiske myndigheder af 14.12.1995.
Letter from the Portuguese authorities of 14 December 1995.
Lovdekret nr. 91-A/77 fastlagde, at RTP skulle forvaltes af en administrativ kommission på grund af den strukturelle krise.
Law 91/A/77 stipulated that an Administrative Council should govern RTP on account of its structural crisis.
Se sag C-342/96.
Case C-342/96.
NN 141/95, Finansiering af Radiotelevisão Portuguesa (EFT C 67 af 4.3.1997, s. 10).
NN 141/95, Financing of the Portuguese public television service (OJ C 67, 4.3.1997, p. 10).
Sag T-46/97, præmis 50.
Case T-46/97, paragraph 50.
Meddelelse til medlemsstaterne fra Kommissionen — Anvendelse af EØF-traktatens artikel 92 og 93 og af artikel 5 i Kommissionens direktiv 80/723/EØF på offentlige virksomheder i fremstillingssektoren (EFT C 307 af 13.11.1993, s. 3).
Commission communication on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EEC Treaty and of Article 5 of Commission Directive 80/723/EEC to public undertakings in the manufacturing sector (OJ C 307, 13.11.1993, p. 3).
Denne referencesats ville basere sig på interbankrenten for swaps over fem år, forhøjet med en præmie (EFT C 273 af 9.9.1997, s. 3).
The reference rate is based on the five-year interbank swap rate plus a premium (OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3).
Portugals referencesatser siden 1.1.1997 findes på følgende internetadresse: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html
The reference rates for Portugal since 1 January 1997 can be found at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html.
Se forenede sager T-85/00, T-216/00, T-299/00 og T-300/00, Métropole Télevision SA (M6) (T-185/00), Antena 3 de Televisión, SA (T-216/00), Gestevisión Telecinco, SA (T-299/00) og SIC — Sociedade Independente de Communicação, SA (T-300/00) mod Kommissionen, Sml. 2002 II, s. 3805.
See judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2002 in joined Cases T-185/00, T-216/00, T-299/00 and T-300/00 Métropole Télévision SA (M6) (T-185/00), Antena 3 de Televisión, SA (T-216/00), Gestevisión Telecinco, SA (T-299/00) and SIC - Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, SA (T-300/00) v Commission of the European Communities [2002] p. II-3805.
I henhold til Domstolens retspraksis må det antages, at samhandelen påvirkes af støtten, når en finansiel støtte, som ydes af en stat, styrker en virksomheds position i forhold til andre virksomheder, som den konkurrerer med i samhandelen inden for Fællesskabet.
According to the case law of the Court of Justice, when aid strengthens the position of an undertaking compared with other undertakings competing in intra-Community trade, the latter must be regarded as affected by that aid.
Sag 730/79, Philip Morris Holland mod Kommissionen, Sml. 1980, s. 2671, præmis 11. C-303/88, Italien mod Kommissionen, Sml. 1991 I, s. 1433, præmis 17, C-156/98, Tyskland mod Kommissionen, Sml. 2000 I, s. 6857, præmis 33.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 September 1980 in Cases 730/79 Philip Morris Holland v Commission of the European Communities [1980] ECR 671, paragraph 11; judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 March 1991 in Case C-303/88 Republic of Italy v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 17; judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 September 2000 in Case C-156/98 Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities [2000] p. I-6857, paragraph 33.
Domstolens dom af 24.7.2003 i sag C-280/00, Altmark Trans og Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg mod Nahverkehrgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, Sml. 2003 I, s. 7747.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 July 2003 in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH et Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [2003] p. I-7747.
Præmis 101 til 109 i Altmark-dommen.
Ibidem, paragraphs 101 to 109.
Domstolen undersøgte her spørgsmålet, om visse statslige betalinger til transportvirksomheder og som udgjorde statsstøtte kunne betragtes som forenelige med fællesmarkedet i henhold til traktatens artikel 77 i deres egenskab af betaling for udførelsen af tjenesteydelser af offentlig interesse.
In those paragraphs the Court examined the question of whether some state payments to transport undertakings classified as state aid could be found to be compatible with the common market under Article 77 of the Treaty as reimbursement for the discharge of public service obligations.
Domstolen udelukkede ikke denne mulighed, når visse betingelser fastlagt i afledt ret vedrørende transportsektoren er opfyldt.
It did not rule out this possibility, provided that the binding conditions laid down by the secondary legislation for the transport sector were met.
Dette ræsonnement bør finde tilsvarende anvendelse på virksomheder, der har fået pålagt udførelsen af tjenesteydelser af almindelig økonomisk interesse, og med udgangspunkt i artikel 86, stk. 2.
This reasoning must apply mutatis mutandis to undertaking entrusted with an SGEI outside the transport sector and in relation to Article 86(2).
Se punkt 29 i meddelelsen.
See paragraph 29 of the communication on broadcasting.
I protokollen hedder det, at offentlig radio- og tv-virksomhed hænger direkte sammen med de demokratiske, sociale og kulturelle behov i de enkelte samfund og med nødvendigheden af at bevare mediepluralisme.
The Protocol considers that the system of public broadcasting is directly related to the democratic, social and cultural needs of each society and to the need to preserve media pluralism.
Mere specifikt hedder det, at medlemsstaterne har »kompetence til (…) at finansiere public service radio- og tv-virksomhed, for så vidt finansieringen ydes til radio- og fjernsynsforetagender, så disse kan opfylde deres public service-opgaver som pålagt dem, defineret og tilrettelagt af de enkelte medlemsstater, og denne finansiering ikke ændrer handels- og konkurrencevilkårene i Fællesskabet i et omfang, der strider mod de fælles interesser, idet der tages hensyn til opfyldelsen af disse public service-opgaver«.
More specifically, Member States have ‘the competence […] to provide for the funding of public service broadcasting insofar as such funding is granted to broadcasting organisations for the fulfilment of the public service remit as conferred, defined and organised by each Member State, and in so far as such funding does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Community to an extent which would be contrary to the common interest, while the realisation of the remit of that public service shall be taken into account’.
Se punkt 33 i meddelelsen.
See paragraph 33 of the communication.
Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØF af 3. oktober 1989 om samordning af visse love og administrative bestemmelser i medlemsstaterne vedrørende udøvelse af tv- radiospredningsvirksomhed (EFT L 298 af 17.10.1989, s. 23).
Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ L 298, 17.10.1989, p. 23).
Det hedder i direktivets artikel 5, at »medlemsstaterne skal (…) drage omsorg for, at tv-radiospredningsorganerne afsætter mindst 10 % af sendetiden (…) eller alternativt (…) mindst 10 % af deres programbudget til europæiske programmer, der er fremstillet af producenter, som er uafhængige af disse organer«. I overensstemmelse med betragtning 45 i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 97/36/EF af 30. juni 1997 om ændring af Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØF om samordning af visse love og administrative bestemmelser i medlemsstaterne vedrørende udøvelse af tv-spredningsvirksomhed (EFT L 202 af 30.7.1997, s. 60) hedder det endvidere, at »målsætningen om at støtte den europæiske programindustri kan opfyldes i medlemsstaterne (…) ved at de pålægger visse tv-spredningsorganisationer en pligt til at varetage offentlige interesser, herunder pligt til i væsentligt omfang at investere i europæiske produktioner«.
According to Article 5, ‘Member States shall ensure […] that broadcasters reserve at least 10 % of their transmission time […], or alternately, […], at least 10 % of their programming budget, for European works created by producers who are independent of broadcasters.’Furthermore, according to recital 45 to Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, ‘the objective of supporting audiovisual production in Europe can be pursued within the Member State through the definition of a public interest mission for certain broadcasting organisations, […] including the obligation to contribute substantially to investment in European production’ ( OJ L 202, 30.7.1997, p. 60).
Klausul 13 i den tidligere og klausul 7, stk. 1, litra a), i den nye public service-aftale.
Clause 13 of the Old Public Service Contract and Clause 7(1)(a) of the New Public Service Contract.
Brev fra de portugisiske myndigheder af 30.6.1999.
Letter of the Portuguese authorities of 30 June 1999.
Punkt 40 i meddelelsen.
Communication on broadcasting, paragraph 40.
Punkt 57 og 58 i meddelelsen.
Communication on broadcasting, paragraphs 57 and 58.
De driftsudgifter for kanal 1 og 2, som i overensstemmelse med den tidligere public service-aftale svarede til finansieringsudgifter og til korrespondentudgifter, som ligeledes påløber andre operatører.
The operating costs of the first and second channel under the Old Public Service Contract correspond to the financing costs and the costs of correspondence where other operators were also set up.
Punkt 58 i meddelelsen.
Communication on broadcasting, paragraph 58.
Punkt 91 i åbningsskrivelsen.
Paragraph 91 of the decision initiating the procedure.
Det skal understreges, at klageren, SIC, i 1993 ligeledes påstod overtrædelse af EF-traktatens artikel 86, stk. 1 (tidl. artikel 90), i forbindelse med en juridisk enhed oprettet af den portugisiske stat på markedet for reklame og i forbindelse med RTP's programerhvervelsespolitik (se også Kommissionens beslutning 89/536/EØF (EFT L 284 af 3.10.1989, s. 36).
It should be pointed out that in 1993 the complainant SIC also alleged a violation of Article 86(1) of the EC Treaty (formerly Article 90) as regards the legal structure put in place by the Portuguese State on the advertising market and RTP's programme acquisition policy (see also Commission Decision 89/536CEE of 17 September 1989).
Kommissionen vurderede efterfølgende påstandene i lyset af artikel 86, stk. 1.
Subsequently, the Commission assessed these allegations under Article 86(1).
Mellem 1991 og 1994 tilhørte det portugisiske tv-net den offentlige virksomhed, TDP SA. Fra 1994 tilhørte nettet Portugal Telecom, en virksomhed dannet ved fusion mellem Telecom Portugal SA, Telefones de Lisboa e Porto SA og TDP SA. Efter oprettelsen af Portugal Telecom reducerede staten gradvis sin deltagelse i selskabet.
Between 1991 and 1994 the television broadcasting network was owned by the public company TDP SA. After 1994 the network was owned by Portugal Telecom, a company created from the combination of Telecom Portugal SA, Telefones de Lisboa e Porto SA and TDP SA. After the creation of Portugal Telecom, the State periodically decreased its holding in the company.
Teletekst
Teletext
Ifølge de portugisiske myndigheder viste den valgte model for finansiering af RTP's udgifter fra public service-tv sig uegnet og førte til kommercielle tab. For det første blev kompensationsbetalingerne altid beregnet til under det reelt nødvendige beløb til finansiering af public service-tv.
According to the Portuguese authorities, the financing model chosen to compensate RTP for its public service costs proved inadequate and led to trading deficits. Firstly, the compensatory allowances were always calculated at below the real needs of public service television financing.
Enhver form for tab af indtægter som følge af accepten af betalingsforsinkelserne i perioden forud for medio 1997 bør således betragtes som »statsmidler« [53].
Therefore, any loss of income resulting from the acceptance of late payments from the period before mid-1997 should be regarded as public resources [53].
Dog synes staten ikke at have betalt RTP i kontanter, men gjorde sig til debitor for RTP for et beløb på 5400 mio. PTE.
However, it appears that the State did not pay RTP in cash but became a debtor of RTP for the amount of PTE 5400 million. Eventually, RTP adjusted its claims against retained losses.
om den statsstøtte, som Det Forenede Kongerige vil give British Energy plc
on the State aid which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for British Energy plc
(meddelt under nummer K(2004) 3474)
(notified under document number C(2004)3474)
Den 9. september 2002 iværksatte regeringen i Det Forenede Kongerige (»UK«) en redningspakke for det britiske el-selskab British Energy plc (»BE«).
On 9 September 2002, the United Kingdom (UK) Government put in place a rescue aid package for the UK electricity company British Energy plc (BE).
Kommissionen traf beslutning om at undlade at gøre indsigelse i sagen den 27. november 2002 [2].
The Commission took a decision not to raise objection in this case on 27 November 2002 [2].
I henhold til beslutningen havde de britiske myndigheder en frist indtil den 9. marts 2003 til at forelægge en omstrukturerings- eller likvidationsplan eller til at dokumentere, at støtten var blevet tilbagebetalt.
Under that decision, the UK authorities had until 9 March 2003 to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan for BE, or to demonstrate that the aid had been repaid.
Den 7. marts 2003 gav de britiske myndigheder Kommissionen meddelelse om en omstruktureringsplan.
On 7 March 2003, the UK authorities notified a restructuring plan to the Commission.
Den britiske regerings meddelelse blev registreret under statsstøttesag NN 45/03, da visse omstruktureringsforanstaltninger, som muligvis omfattede støtte, allerede var trådt i kraft.
The submission by the UK Government was registered under State aid case number NN 45/2003 since certain restructuring measures possibly containing aid had already entered into force.
Der blev indsendt yderligere oplysninger den 13. marts 2003.
Further information was submitted on 13 March 2003.
Der blev holdt møde mellem repræsentanter fra henholdsvis Kommissionen og de britiske myndigheder den 28. marts 2003.
A meeting between representatives of the Commission and of the UK authorities took place on 28 March 2003.
Kommissionen anmodede de britiske myndigheder om oplysninger den 21. april 2003, og de britiske myndigheder svarede den 2. maj 2003.
The Commission sent the UK authorities a request for information on 21 April 2003, to which the UK authorities replied on 2 May 2003.
Ved brev af 23. juli 2003 meddelte Kommissionen Det Forenede Kongerige, at den havde besluttet at indlede den i EF-traktatens artikel 88, stk. 2, fastsatte procedure, for så vidt angik støtten.
By letter dated 23 July 2003, the Commission informed the United Kingdom that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
De britiske myndigheder fremsatte deres bemærkninger vedrørende indledningen af proceduren for Kommissionen ved brev af 22. august 2003, der indgik til Kommissionen samme dag.
The UK authorities provided the Commission with their comments on the opening of the procedure by letter dated 22 August 2003, registered by the Commission on the same day.
Kommissionen har modtaget bemærkninger fra interesserede parter.
The Commission received comments from interested parties.
Den fremsendte dem til Det Forenede Kongerige, der fik lejlighed til at reagere; Det Forenede Kongeriges bemærkninger blev modtaget ved brev af 29. oktober 2003, der indgik til Kommissionen den 30. oktober 2003.
It forwarded them to the United Kingdom, which was given the opportunity to react; its comments were received by letter dated 29 October 2003, registered by the Commission on 30 October 2003.
Kommissionen mødtes med de britiske myndigheder den 7. oktober 2003.
The Commission met the United Kingdom authorities on 7 October 2003.
Efter dette møde forelagde Det Forenede Kongerige oplysninger ved brev af 5. november 2003, som indgik den 10. november 2003.
Following that meeting, the United Kingdom submitted information in a letter dated 5 November 2003, registered on 10 November 2003.
Endnu et møde fandt sted den 28. november 2003.
Another meeting took place on 28 November 2003.
Kommissionen anmodede Det Forenede Kongerige om oplysninger den 5. december 2003, og de britiske myndigheder svarede den 22. december 2003.
The Commission sent a request for information to the United Kingdom on 5 December 2003 to which the United Kingdom replied on 22 December 2003.
Endnu et møde fandt sted den 2. februar 2004.
Another meeting took place on 2 February 2004.
Det Forenede Kongerige forelagde oplysninger den 4. februar 2004.
The United Kingdom submitted information on 4 February 2004.
Det Forenede Kongerige forelagde nye oplysninger den 10. marts 2004.
New information was submitted by the United Kingdom on 10 March 2004.
Et møde fandt sted den 22. marts 2004.
A meeting took place on 22 March 2004.
Kommissionen fremsendte en ny anmodning den 19. april 2004, og Det Forenede Kongerige svarede den 11. maj 2004.
The Commission sent a new request on 19 April 2004 to which the United Kingdom replied on 11 May 2004.
Et møde fandt sted den 7. juni 2004.
A meeting took place on 7 June 2004.
Der blev forelagt nye oplysninger den 1. juli 2004, og der blev holdt et møde den 29. juli 2004.
New information was submitted on 1 July 2004 and a meeting was held on 29 July 2004.
Det Forenede Kongerige forelagde yderligere oplysninger den 23. august 2004.
The United Kingdom submitted further information on 23 August 2004
Støttemodtager
Beneficiary of the aid