natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Da der var blevet godtaget tilsagn, blev det i denne sag navnlig undersøgt, om disse tilsagn havde påvirket de tidligere eksportpriser i en sådan grad, at det gjorde dem upålidelige til en beregning af fremtidig eksportadfærd.
In this case, and in view of the fact that undertakings were accepted, it was examined in particular whether the existence of such undertakings has influenced the past export prices, so as to make them unreliable for the establishment of future export behaviour.
For at undersøge, om priserne ved eksport til Fællesskabet var pålidelige, blev eksportpriserne til Fællesskabet på grund af de eksisterende tilsagn undersøgt i forhold til mindsteimportpriserne i tilsagnene.
In order to examine whether export prices to the Community were reliable and given the existence of undertakings, export prices to the Community were analysed in relation to the minimum import prices (MIPs) of the undertakings.
Det var faktisk nødvendigt at kontrollere, om priserne ved eksport til Fællesskabet var fastsat på et bestemt niveau som følge af virkningerne af mindsteimportpriserne i tilsagnene, og således, om de var bæredygtige.
It was in fact necessary to ascertain whether export prices to the Community were set at a certain level mainly as the effect of the existence of the MIPs established by the undertakings and therefore whether they were sustainable or not.
Det blev derfor på et vejet gennemsnitligt grundlag for hver enkelt selskab undersøgt, om priserne ved salg til EF-markedet var meget højere end mindsteimportpriserne, under hensyntagen til de særlige forhold ved den pågældende vare og de markeder, hvor den var blevet solgt i undersøgelsesperioden, og hvordan disse priser var forbundet med priserne ved eksport til tredjelande.
It was therefore considered, on a weighted average basis at the level of each company, whether the prices practised for sales to the Community market were substantially above the MIPs or not, taking into consideration the particularities of the product concerned and the markets on which it was being sold during the IP, and how these prices related to prices for exports to third countries.
I tilfælde, hvor priserne ved eksport til Fællesskabet i gennemsnit lå pænt over mindsteimportpriserne på selskabsniveau, blev det anset, at disse eksportpriser var fastsat tilstrækkeligt uafhængigt af tilsagnene og derfor var pålidelige som en angivelse af den prisfastsættelsesadfærd, som eksportørerne sandsynligvis ville udvise i fremtiden.
When export prices to the Community were on average well above the MIPs at company level, it was considered that these export prices were set sufficiently independently from the undertakings, and therefore reliable as an indication of the price-setting behaviour which exporters would be likely to show in the future.
Lå priserne ved eksport til Fællesskabet i gennemsnit ikke tilstrækkeligt over mindsteimportpriserne, men samtidig langt over priserne ved eksport til tredjelande, blev førstnævnte til gengæld anset for at være påvirket af tilsagnene og således for ikke at være pålidelige nok til at blive anvendt til dumpingberegningen i forbindelse med en interimsundersøgelse, jf. artikel 2, stk. 8, i grundforordningen.
On the contrary, when export prices to the Community were on average not sufficiently above the MIPs and in addition significantly above export prices to third countries, the former were considered to be influenced by the undertakings and therefore not reliable enough to be used for the dumping calculation, pursuant to Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, in the context of an interim review.
For to indiske eksportører, Flex og Polyplex, konstateredes det, at deres priser ved eksport til Fællesskabet lå betydeligt over mindsteimportpriserne.
For two Indian exporters, Flex and Polyplex, it was found that their export prices to the Community were substantially above the MIPs.
Disse priser blev derfor anset for at være pålidelige og blev anvendt i dumpingberegningerne.
Therefore, these export prices to the Community were considered as reliable and were used in the dumping calculations.
For de tre andre eksporterende producenter, Ester, Garware og MTZ, konstateredes det, at priserne ved eksport til Fællesskabet lå meget tæt på mindsteimportpriserne.
For the other three exporting producers, Ester, Garware and MTZ, it was found that the export prices to the Community were very close to the MIPs.
De tre selskabers priser ved eksport til andre tredjelande lå også betydeligt under priserne til Fællesskabet, hvis de blev betragtet for hver enkelt type, hvilket gjorde det sandsynligt, at disse salgspriser til Fællesskabet i en situation uden tilsagn ville blive fastsat på linje med priserne for samme type ved salg til andre tredjelande.
Moreover, it was also found that the export prices of these three companies to other third countries were, when considered on a type by type basis, considerably below the prices to the Community, thus making it likely that, in the absence of undertakings such prices to the Community would be aligned to the prices made for the same types to other third countries.
Konklusionen var derfor, at de tre selskabers priser ved eksport til Fællesskabet ikke kunne anvendes til fastsættelse af pålidelige eksportpriser i forbindelse med nærværende interimsundersøgelse, jf. artikel 2, stk. 8, i grundforordningen.
It was therefore concluded that the export prices of these three companies to the Community could not be used to establish reliable export prices in the meaning of Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, in the context of the present interim review.
Det blev imidlertid fastslået, at mangelen på en pålidelig pris for disse tre indiske eksportører på grund af de eksisterende tilsagn i denne sag ikke burde føre til en afslutning af den fornyede undersøgelse for de pågældende eksportørers vedkommende, hvis det på anden måde var muligt at fastslå, at der var sket en vedvarende ændring i omstændighederne vedrørende deres dumpingadfærd, navnlig i forbindelse med eksportpriser.
It was considered, however, that the absence of a reliable price for these three Indian exporters, due to the existence of the undertakings in this case, should not lead to the termination of the review for these exporters, if a lasting change in circumstances regarding their dumping behaviour, in particular regarding export prices, could nevertheless be otherwise established.
Da de eksporterende producenter solgte den pågældende vare på verdensmarkedet, blev det besluttet at fastlægge eksportprisen for de modeller, der solgtes til Fællesskabet, på grundlag af de priser, der faktisk var betalt eller skulle betales ved salg til alle tredjelande.
To this end and, given that the exporting producers were selling the product concerned on the world market, it was decided to establish the export price on the basis of prices actually paid or payable to all third countries for those models sold to the Community.
Efter offentliggørelse af de vigtigste kendsgerninger og betragtninger, på grundlag af hvilke det var hensigten at foreslå en ændring af forordning (EF) nr. 1676/2001, fremsatte flere parter bemærkninger.
Following disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to propose an amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001, a number of parties came forward with comments.
Flere indiske eksporterende producenter og den indiske regering hævdede, at artikel 2, stk. 8, eller artikel 2, stk. 9, i grundforordningen ikke gav noget retsgrundlag for at basere eksportpriserne på priserne ved eksport til tredjelande.
A number of Indian exporting producers and the Indian Government maintained that no legal basis existed under Articles 2(8) or 2(9) of the basic Regulation for basing export prices on those to third countries.
De hævdede, at der fandtes eksportpriser til Fællesskabet, og at det ikke på nogen tilfredsstillende måde var blevet påvist, at der var et tilstrækkeligt grundlag for at afvise de pågældende eksportpriser.
They argued that export prices to the Community existed and that it was not satisfactorily demonstrated that there was a sufficient basis to reject the use of those export prices.
De fastholdt, at eksportpriserne til Fællesskabet var pålidelige, og at de burde anvendes i stedet for priserne til tredjelande.
They maintained that the export prices to the Community were reliable and that they should be used instead of prices to third countries.
Hvad angår brugen af priserne ved eksport til tredjelande, er det nødvendigt at påpege, at formålet med denne fornyede undersøgelse i henhold til artikel 11, stk. 3, i grundforordningen er at fastslå, om det fortsat er nødvendigt med foranstaltninger til at opveje dumping.
In respect of the use of export prices to third countries, it must be stated that the purpose of this review under Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation is to determine whether the continued imposition of the measures is still necessary to offset dumping.
Ved en gennemgang af dumpingniveauet for de berørte eksportører er det nødvendigt at undersøge de ændringer, der er sket i dumpingniveauet i forhold til de oprindelige resultater angående dumping.
In examining the level of dumping of the exporters concerned, it is necessary to examine the change in the level of dumping compared to the original findings on dumping.
Det skal bemærkes, at brugen af priserne til tredjelande i stedet for priserne til Fællesskabet i tre indiske eksporterende producenters tilfælde ikke er baseret på artikel 2, stk. 8, og artikel 2, stk. 9, i grundforordningen.
It should be noted that the use of the prices to third countries rather than those to the Community in the case of three Indian exporting producers is not based on the application of Articles 2(8) and 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Som angivet i betragtning 27 og 28 er det berettiget, idet det er nødvendigt at vurdere sandsynligheden for, om priserne til Fællesskabet vil blive opretholdt i fremtiden, og følgelig, om der igen vil forekomme dumping.
As explained in recitals (27) and (28), this is justified by the need to assess the likelihood of those prices to the Community being maintained in the future and, consequently, the likelihood of recurrence of dumping.
Konklusionen af vurderingen var, at de tre indiske eksporterende producenters priser til Fællesskabet havde været påvirket af mindsteimportpriserne, da de var blevet fastsat meget tæt på mindsteimportpriserne.
The conclusion drawn from this assessment was that, in the case of three Indian exporting producers, their prices to the Community had been influenced by the existence of the MIPs, since they were set very close to the MIPs.
De var således ikke kun et resultat af markedskræfterne, og det var usandsynligt, at de ville blive fastholdt på samme niveau i fremtiden.
Thus, they were not a result of only market forces and were unlikely to be maintained at the same level into the future.
Det blev derfor fastslået, at der ikke var nogen priser til Fællesskabet, som kunne anvendes til beregningen af dumping.
Consequently, it was considered that there were no prices to the Community which could be used for the calculation of dumping.
I mangel af en eksportpris til Fællesskabet blev det anset, at priserne til tredjelande udgjorde et nøjagtigt og rimeligt alternativt grundlag for fastsættelsen af eksportpriser i undersøgelsesperioden og for beregningen af dumping.
In the absence of an export price to the Community, it was considered that prices to third countries formed an accurate and reasonable alternative basis for the establishment of export prices during the investigation period and for the calculation of dumping.
En indisk eksporterende producent hævdede, at der var tale om forskelsbehandling, når man afviste at anvende vedkommendes priser ved salg til Fællesskabet og i stedet anvendte selskabets priser til tredjelande, idet det således blev behandlet anderledes end de eksportører, i forbindelse med hvilke man anvendte de pågældendes priser ved salg til Fællesskabet.
One Indian exporting producer argued that the rejection of its sales prices to the Community and the use of its prices to third countries constituted discrimination in that it was treated differently from those exporters for which their actual sales prices to the Community were used.
Det skal i den forbindelse bemærkes, at der ikke var tale om forskelsbehandling i forbindelse med fastsættelsen af eksportpriser, da samme fremgangsmåde blev anvendt over for alle indiske eksportører.
In this respect, it should be noted that no discrimination occurred in establishing export prices since the same approach was taken in respect of all Indian exporters.
For hver eksportør blev det vurderet, om der fandtes egnede priser ved eksport til Fællesskabet med henblik på beregningen af dumping.
In respect of each exporting producer, the existence of suitable export prices to the Community for the purpose of the calculation of dumping was assessed.
Dette foregik ved, at hver enkelt eksporterende producents priser ved eksport til Fællesskabet blev sammenlignet med mindsteimportpriserne, så det var muligt at fastslå, om de kunne anses for at være blevet fastsat uafhængigt af de pågældende mindsteimportpriser.
This was carried out by comparing each exporting producer’s export prices to the Community with the MIPs in order to establish whether or not they could be considered as having been set independently of those MIPs.
Som beskrevet i betragtning 28 var konklusionen i de tilfælde, hvor priserne lå tilstrækkeligt over mindsteimportpriserne, at de ikke var påvirket af mindsteimportpriserne, og at priserne derfor kunne anvendes til dumpingberegningen, da de var pålidelige som en angivelse af, hvilken prisadfærd den eksporterende producent sandsynligvis ville udvise i fremtiden.
As explained in recital (28), in cases where those prices were sufficiently above the MIPs it was concluded that they had not been influenced by the MIPs and that the prices could be used for the dumping calculation as they were reliable as an indication of the price-setting behaviour which the exporting producer would be likely to show in the future.
I de tilfælde, hvor det blev anset, at priserne til Fællesskabet var påvirket af mindstepriserne, blev de ikke anset for at være en pålidelig angivelse af, hvilken prisadfærd den eksporterende producent sandsynligvis ville udvise i fremtiden, og de blev ikke anvendt til dumpingberegningen, og priserne til tredjelande blev anvendt som alternativ.
Where it was considered that the prices to the Community had been influenced by the existence of the MIPs, then those prices were not considered reliable as an indication of the price-setting behaviour which the exporter would be likely to show in the future and were not used for the dumping calculation, prices to third countries being used as an alternative.
Det forhold, at nogle eksportørers eksportpriser til Fællesskabet blev anvendt, medens der for andre eksportørers vedkommende blev gjort brug af de pågældendes priser ved eksport til tredjelande, er således ikke tegn på nogen forskelsbehandling mellem eksportørerne.
The fact therefore that actual export prices of some exporters were used, while for other exporters their export prices to third countries were used, is not a discrimination of treatment between exporters.
Flere indiske eksporterende producenter var ikke enige i konklusionen om, at deres priser ved eksport til Fællesskabet lå meget tæt på mindsteimportpriserne og derfor ikke kunne anvendes til dumpingberegningen.
A number of Indian exporting producers disagreed with the conclusion that their export prices to the Community were very close to the MIPs and therefore could not be used for the calculation of dumping.
De fandt, at deres priser lå tilstrækkeligt over mindsteimportpriserne, og fremførte, at der i henhold til pristilsagnet kun var krav om, at de ikke solgte under mindsteimportpriserne.
They considered that their prices were sufficiently above the MIPs and pointed out that under the price undertaking they were merely required not to sell below the MIPs.
En eksportør hævdede, at sammenligningen med mindsteimportpriserne ikke var et tilfredsstillende grundlag til at fastslå, om priserne ved salg til Fællesskabet var rimelige og pålidelige, men at en sammenligning med andre indiske eksporterende producenters eller EF-erhvervsgrenens priser ville være mere passende.
One exporter argued that comparison against the MIPs was not a satisfactory basis to determine whether or not prices to the Community were reasonable and reliable, but that a comparison with the prices of other Indian exporting producers or of the Community industry would be more suitable.
Som beskrevet i betragtning 30 konstaterede EF's institutioner, at tre eksporterende producenters priser ikke lå tilstrækkeligt langt over mindsteimportpriserne til, at det var muligt at påvise, at de var blevet fastsat uafhængigt af mindsteimportpriserne.
In this respect, as explained in recital (30), the Community institutions found that the prices of three exporting producers were not sufficiently above the level of the MIPs so as to demonstrate that they had been set independently of the MIPs.
Disse priser udgjorde derfor ikke noget passende grundlag for dumpingberegningen.
Therefore, such prices did not form a suitable basis for the dumping calculation.
Det forhold, at der i henhold til pristilsagnene kun var krav om, at de eksporterende producenter ikke solgte under mindsteimportpriserne, blev således ikke anfægtet, men det blev anset for ikke at være relevant for denne form for analyse.
The fact that, under the price undertakings, the exporting producers were merely required not to sell below the MIPs was therefore not only not contested but irrelevant for this type of analysis.
Til undersøgelsen af, om priserne til Fællesskabet var blevet påvirket af de gældende mindsteimportpriser, skal det bemærkes, at det i forbindelse med tilsagn er nødvendigt at fastslå, om eksportpriserne er pålidelige og udgør det korrekte grundlag for beregningen af dumpingmargener.
In the context of considering whether or not the prices to the Community had been influenced by the existence of the MIPs, it should be noted that when undertakings are present it is necessary to consider whether or not export prices are reliable and form a proper basis for the calculation of dumping margins.
Når priserne til Fællesskabet påvirkes af andre faktorer end markedskræfterne såsom mindsteimportpriser i tilsagn, anses de pågældende priser for ikke at være rimelige eller pålidelige.
When prices to the Community are influenced by factors other than market forces, such as the undertaking MIPs, then these prices are considered as not reasonable or reliable.
Det skal understreges, at en sammenligning med hver enkelt eksporterende producents priser til andre tredjelande som angivet i betragtning 28 blev anset for at være en bedre metode til at fastslå en bestemt eksporterende producents prisadfærd end en sammenligning med andre indiske eksporterende producenters eller EF-erhvervsgrenens priser, da det gav bedre indsigt i den enkelte eksporterende producents forretningsmæssige adfærd.
In this case, it must be pointed out that a comparison with the prices of each exporting producer to other third countries, as mentioned in recital (28), was considered more appropriate to determine the price-setting behaviour of a particular exporting producer, than a comparison with the prices of other Indian exporting producers or the Community industry, since it provided a better insight into the individual exporting producer's business behaviour.
EF-erhvervsgrenen hævdede, at der på baggrund af tilsagnsprisernes forvridende virkninger ikke burde have været gjort brug af priserne ved salg til Fællesskabet, og at der i stedet burde have været gjort brug af priserne til tredjelande for alle indiske eksporterende producenter.
The Community industry argued that in view of the distorting effect of the undertaking MIPs, actual sales prices to the Community should have been rejected and use made instead of prices to third countries in the case of all the Indian exporting producers.
De udtrykte også bekymring for, at de pågældende indiske producenter med lave dumpingmargener, som var beregnet ved anvendelse af priserne ved eksport til Fællesskabet, ikke ville fortsætte med at holde deres priser på samme niveau i fremtiden.
They also expressed concern that those Indian exporting producers with low dumping margins calculated using export prices to the Community, would not continue to maintain their prices at the same level in the future.
Hvad dette argument angår, blev der som angivet i betragtning 32 anvendt samme fremgangsmåde over for alle indiske eksporterende producenter.
As concerns this argument, and as explained at recital (32), the same approach was adopted in respect of all Indian exporting producers.
Om der blev gjort brug af den enkelte eksportørs priser til Fællesskabet eller ej, blev bestemt på grundlag af vurderingen af, om de pågældende priser var påvirket af de gældende mindsteimportpriser, og på grundlag af forskellen mellem deres priser ved eksport til Fællesskabet og ved eksport til tredjelande, som beskrevet i betragtning 28.
The use or non-use of each exporter's prices to the Community was based on the result of the assessment of whether or not those prices were influenced by the existence of the MIPs and on the difference between their price to the Community and export prices to third countries, as explained in recital (28).
EF-erhvervsgrenen hævdede også, at den sammenligning, der blev foretaget på et vejet gennemsnitligt grundlag af eksportpriserne og mindsteimportpriserne med henblik på at fastslå, om priserne til Fællesskabet var repræsentative for fremtidig adfærd og pålidelige for vurderingen af dumping, var i strid med resultaterne af den fornyede undersøgelse af foranstaltningernes form, nemlig at mindsteimportpriser ikke længere var egnede.
The Community industry also maintained that the comparison on a weighted average basis of export prices with the MIPs, in order to determine whether prices to the Community were representative of future behaviour and reliable for the assessment of dumping, was contradictory to the findings of the review of the form of the measures that the MIPs were no longer appropriate.
Det skal bemærkes, at spørgsmålet i den fornyede undersøgelse af foranstaltningernes form var, om pristilsagn stadig var egnede og relevante (i den betydning, at de ville få samme virkning som antidumpingtold) for de varer, der blev eksporteret i henhold til tilsagnene (se betragtning 8 i forordning (EF) nr. 365/2006).
In this regard it is to be noted that the question under the review of the form of the anti-dumping measures was whether or not the price undertakings were still appropriate or relevant (in the sense that they would have the same effect as the imposition of an anti-dumping duty) to the products being exported under them (see recital (8) of Council Regulation (EC) No 365/2006).
I den pågældende undersøgelse konstateredes det, at udvalget af priser til EF havde ændret sig betydeligt for nogle varegrupper (det var enten blevet større eller mindre) i forhold til den oprindelige undersøgelse, og konklusionen var, at de specifikke mindsteimportpriser, som var baseret på de oprindelige priser, ikke var egnet til at opveje de skadelige virkninger af dumping i forbindelse med det nuværende salg.
In that review it was found that for some product groupings the range of actual prices to the Community had changed (either widened or narrowed) significantly from the original investigation and it was concluded that the specific MIPs based on the original prices were inappropriate to counteract the injurious effect of dumping in respect of current sales.
I nærværende fornyede undersøgelse var spørgsmålet, om priserne til EF var påvirket af de gældende mindsteimportpriser i tilsagnene, dvs. om de ville blive opretholdt eller ej.
Under the present review, the question was whether or not the prices to the Community were influenced by the existence of the undertaking MIPs, i.e. whether or not they are lasting.