natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Som det fremgår af denne forordning, ville omstruktureringsprogrammet fra maj 2001 dog under ingen omstændigheder blive udlignet, da størstedelen af den fordel, det indebar, ville være blevet modregnet i foranstaltningerne fra oktober 2001.
However, as noted in this Regulation, the May 2001 restructuring programme would not in any event be countervailed, given that the largest proportion of the benefit would have been accounted for in the October 2001 measures.
Navnlig af den grund har Kommissionen besluttet ikke at tage disse spørgsmål op igen i denne gennemførelsesforordning.
Mainly for this reason, the Commission has decided not to return to these issues in this implementing Regulation.
Alle de bemærkninger, der blev fremsat af de berørte parter, blev således vurderet og taget i betragtning, i det omfang det var relevant.
Thus, all comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
En række af de fremsatte bemærkninger faldt dog uden for denne forordnings anvendelsesområde, som alene er begrænset til gennemførelsen af Tvistbilæggelsesorganets henstillinger.
However, certain comments were outside the scope of this Regulation which is only intended to implement the DSB recommendations.
Disse bemærkninger har derfor ikke resulteret i nogen ændring af denne forordning —
Thus, such comments have not resulted in any changes to this Regulation,
Artikel 1, stk. 2 og 3, affattes således:
Article 1(2) and (3) shall be replaced by the following:
Den endelige udligningstold fastsættes til følgende af nettoprisen, frit Fællesskabets grænse, ufortoldet:
The rate of the definitive countervailing duty applicable to the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, shall be as follows:
Sydkoreanske producenter
Korean producers
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd(»Samsung«)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (Samsung)
Ved fremlæggelse for medlemsstatens toldmyndigheder af toldangivelsen om overgang til fri omsætning af multikombinerbare former af DRAMs skal klarereren i rubrik 44 på det administrative enhedsdokument angive det referencenummer, der svarer til nedenstående vare-/oprindelsesbeskrivelse som angivet i følgende skema.
Upon presentation to the Member State’s customs authorities of the customs declaration for release into free circulation of multi-combinational forms of DRAMs, the declarant shall indicate in box 44 of the Single Administrative Document (SAD) the reference number corresponding to the below product/origin descriptions indicated in the following table.
Artikel 1, stk. 5, affattes således:
Article 1(5) shall be replaced by the following:
Hvis der ikke er opført noget referencenummer på det administrative enhedsdokument som omhandlet i stk. 3, eller hvis toldangivelsen i de i stk. 4 omhandlede tilfælde ikke er ledsaget af en erklæring, anses det, at den multikombinerbare form af DRAM — medmindre der foreligger bevis for det modsatte — har oprindelse i Republikken Korea og er fremstillet af alle andre selskaber end Samsung, og udligningstoldsatsen på 32,9 % finder derfor anvendelse.
In the case of no indication of any reference number in the SAD, as foreseen in paragraph 3, or if the customs declaration is not accompanied by any statement in the cases required in paragraph 4, the multi-combinational form of DRAM shall — unless the contrary is proved — be considered as originating in the Republic of Korea and as having been manufactured by all companies other than Samsung, and the countervailing duty rate of 32,9 % shall apply.
I tilfælde, hvor nogle af de DRAM-chips og/eller monterede DRAMs, der indgår i multikombinerbare former af DRAMs, ikke er tydeligt mærket, og det af den i stk. 4 omhandlede erklæring ikke er muligt klart at identificere varens fabrikant, betragtes sådanne DRAM-chips og/eller monterede DRAMs — medmindre der foreligger bevis for det modsatte — at have oprindelse i Republikken Korea og er blevet fremstillet af selskaber, som er omfattet af udligningstolden.
In cases where some of the DRAM chips and/or mounted DRAMs incorporated in multi-combinational forms of DRAMs are not clearly marked and their manufacturers are not clearly identifiable from the statement required in paragraph 4, such DRAM chips and/or mounted DRAMs shall — unless the contrary is proved — be considered as originating in the Republic of Korea and as having been manufactured by companies subject to the countervailing duty.
I sådanne tilfælde beregnes udligningstoldsatsen for multikombinerbare former af DRAMs på grundlag af den procent, som nettoprisen, frit Fællesskabets grænse, for DRAM-chips og/eller monterede DRAMs med oprindelse i Republikken Korea udgør af nettoprisen, frit Fællesskabets grænse, for multikombinerbare former af DRAMs som fastsat i nr. 2-7 i skemaet i stk. 3.
In such cases, the countervailing duty rate applicable to multi-combinational forms of DRAMs shall be calculated on the basis of the percentage represented by the net free-at-Community-frontier price of the DRAM chips and/or mounted DRAMs originating in the Republic of Korea out of the net free-at-Community-frontier price of the multi-combinational forms of DRAM, as established in the table contained in paragraph 3, numbers 2 to 7.
Skulle værdien af de nævnte DRAM-chips og/eller monterede DRAMs imidlertid blive sådan, at det fastslås, at de multikombinerbare former af DRAMs, i hvilke de er indarbejdet, får sydkoreansk oprindelse, finder udligningstolden på 32,9 % anvendelse for de multikombinerbare former af DRAMs.«
Should, however, the value of the aforementioned DRAM chips and/or mounted DRAMs be such to determine that the multi-combinational forms of DRAMs in which they are incorporated becomes of Korean origin, the countervailing duty rate of 32,9 % shall apply to the multi-combinational forms of DRAMs.’.
EFT L 201 af 26.7.2001, s. 10.
OJ L 201, 26.7.2001, p. 10.
EUT L 102 af 24.4.2003, s. 7.
OJ L 102, 24.4.2003, p. 7.
EFT L 336 af 23.12.1994, s. 156.
OJ L 336, 23.12.1994, p. 156.
Ved forordning (EF) nr. 2116/2005 blev forordningen om endelig udligningstold ændret med henblik på at vedtage særlige bestemmelser for at sikre, at udligningstolden opkræves korrekt i forbindelse med den pågældende vare.
Regulation (EC) No 2116/2005 amended the definitive Regulation for the purpose of adopting special provisions in order to ensure that the countervailing duty is properly levied on the product concerned.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.110.
Panel report, paragraph 7.110.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.109.
Panel report, paragraph 7.109.
Ifølge panelets konklusioner må det anses for udligningsberettigede subsidier, at de offentlige organer, der deltog i omstruktureringsprogrammet fra maj 2001, købte konvertible obligationer.
Based on the Panel's findings, the purchase of CBs by the public bodies involved in the May 2001 restructuring programme remains a countervailable subsidy.
Der er dog ikke behov for yderligere foranstaltninger desangående, da der allerede blev taget hensyn til eventuelle fordele i forbindelse med de subsidier, der blev ydet med omstruktureringsprogrammet fra oktober 2001 (se betragtning 65 f.).
However, no further action is required on this point, as any benefit has already been accounted for in the subsidy found to be conferred by the October 2001 restructuring programme (see recital 65 et seq.).
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.69.
Panel report, paragraph 7.69.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.186.
Panel report, paragraph 7.186.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.184.
Panel report, paragraph 7.184.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.184.
Panel report paragraph 7.184.
Se også fodnote 171, hvor panelet nævner, at det er vigtigt at undersøge andre deltagere, men samtidig understreger, at man ikke ønsker at antyde, at undersøgelsen dermed er afsluttet, da det vil skulle fastslås, om disse markedsdeltageres adfærd fordrejes af det statslige indgreb på en sådan måde, at de ikke længere kan anvendes som sammenligningsgrundlag for at opgøre den påståede forvridning fra statens side.
See also footnote 171, where the Panel states that the examination of other participants is important, but that ‘we emphasise that we do not wish to imply that it is necessarily the end-point of such an analysis, as it will need to be determined whether the behaviour of these market players is so distorted by the government's intervention that they can no longer serve as the benchmark against which to measure the alleged government distortion’.
Betragtning 19 til den endelige forordning.
Definitive Regulation, recital 19.
»Kookmin Bank Prospectus, Offering of American Depositary Shares« ( 18. juni 2002) (bilag 67 til Micron Technology Italias bemærkninger af 14. maj 2003 til den midlertidige forordning) (fremhævet her).
Kookmin Bank Prospectus, Offering of American Depositary Shares (18 June 2002) (attachment 67 to Micron Technology Italia’s 14 May 2003 submission on the provisional Regulation) (emphasis added).
Kookmin Banks årsberetning for 2001, s. 58.
Kookmin Bank, Annual Report (2001), page 58.
»Banks Under Fire for Reducing Export Credit Ceilings for HEI«, Korea Herald, 27. januar 2001.
‘Banks Under Fire for Reducing Export Credit Ceilings for HEI’, Korea Herald, 27 January 2001.
»KorAm Reluctantly Continues Financial Support for Hynix«, Korea Times, 21. juni 2001.
‘KorAm Reluctantly Continues Financial Support for Hynix’, Korea Times, 21 June 2001.
Idem.
See footnote 1.
Se »Koran Bks Complete Purchase of KRW1T Hynix Conn Bond«, Dow Jones International News, 20. juni 2001, hvori det nævnes, at den kovending, KorAm Bank foretog ved at omstøde bestyrelsens beslutning, kom, efter at FSS havde advaret banken om faren for en eventuel sanktion over for KorAm, fordi banken havde truet med at bryde den hidtidige redningsaftale for Hynix.
See ‘Koran Bks Complete Purchase of KRW1T Hynix Conn Bond,’ Dow Jones International News, 20 June 2001 (‘KorAm Bank's reversal of its board's decision comes after the Financial Supervisory Service warned of a possible sanction for KorAm for threatening to break the earlier rescue pact for Hynix.’).
Kookmin/H&CB Prospectus, 10. september 2001 (bilag 9 til Micron Italias bemærkninger af 14. februar 2003 efter høringen).
Kookmin/H&CB Prospectus, 10 September 2001 (Micron Italia post hearing submission, 14 February 2003 at Exhibit 9).
»Pusan, Kyongnam Banks Receive Conditional Approval from FSS«, Korea Herald, 18. januar 1999.
‘Pusan, Kyongnam Banks Receive Conditional Approval from FSS’, Korea Herald 18 January 1999.
»Officials of NFLC, Pusan Bank Punished for Mismanagement«, Korea Herald, 29. april 2000.
‘Officials of NFLC, Pusan Bank Punished for Mismanagement’, Korea Herald, 29 April 2000.
Betragtning 87 til den midlertidige forordning.
Provisional Regulation, recital 87.
Panelet nævner i panelrapporten (fodnote 185), at det er korrekt, at Citibank og datterselskabet SSB ikke er statsejede på nogen måde. Panelet mener dog alligevel, at Fællesskabet har fremlagt tilstrækkelige beviser for, at det nære forhold til staten og den særlige rolle som finansiel rådgiver for Hynix under hele omstruktureringen gør Citibank særlig uegnet som et passende markedsbestemt sammenligningsgrundlag til at vurdere, om statens finansielle bidrag var i overensstemmelse med de normale markedsvilkår, eller om Hynix tværtimod opnåede en fordel som følge heraf.
Panel report, footnote 185:‘While it is certainly true that Citibank, and its subsidiary SSB, are not government owned at all, we consider that the EC sufficiently demonstrated that the close relationship with the government and the specific role as financial advisor to Hynix throughout the restructuring make Citibank particularly inapt to serve as an appropriate market benchmark for assessing whether the government’s financial contribution was in line with the normal market conditions, or whether it, on the contrary, conferred a benefit to Hynix.
Retningslinjer for beregningen af subsidiebeløbet i forbindelse med undersøgelser vedrørende udligningstold (EFT C 394 af 17.12.1998, s. 6) (i det følgende benævnt »retningslinjerne«).
Guidelines for the calculation of the amount of subsidy in countervailing duty investigations (Official Journal of the European Communities C 394, 17.12.1998, p. 6) (the Guidelines).
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.211 og 7.212.
Panel report, paragraphs 7.211 and 7.212.
Panelrapporten, punkt 186.
Panel report, footnote 186.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.213.
Panel report, paragraph 7.213.
Panelet nævner omkostningerne for »the provider of the financial contribution« (den finansielle bidragyder), dvs. den sydkoreanske stat og de privatbanker, der kan modtage pålæg fra den.
The Panel refers to the cost to the ‘provider of the financial contribution’, that is, the Government of Korea and the private banks which it directs.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.85.
Panel report, paragraph 7.85.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.189-7.192.
Panel report, paragraphs 7.189 to 7.192.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.189.
Panel report, paragraph 7.189.
Betragtning 87 og 101-112 til den endelige forordning.
Definitive Regulation, recitals 87 and 101 to 112.
Sunde selskaber bør have et nøgletal på 2,0 eller derover, og et nøgletal på under 1,0 er udtryk for, at det pågældende selskab er i »alvorlige finansielle vanskeligheder« (Anthony Saunders ' ekspertrapport, s. 12).
The ‘target ratio’ for healthy firms is 2 or better, and a ratio below 1 ‘signals a firm in extreme financial distress.’ Expert report of Anthony Saunders, p. 12.
Kommissionen påpeger, at der ganske vist var en vis forbedring i Hynix ' balancelikviditet i 2001, nemlig til 0,65, men at denne forbedring alene skyldtes omstruktureringen i oktober 2001, som gjorde det muligt for Hynix at reducere den gældende andel af selskabets langfristede gæld markant og dermed sin kortfristede gæld.
The Commission notes that although Hynix ' s current ratio improved somewhat to 0,65 in 2001, this improvement was solely attributable to the October 2001 restructuring, which enabled Hynix to drastically reduce the current portion of its long-term debt and, thus, its current liabilities.
Idem.
See footnote 2.
Saunders' rapport, s. 18.
Saunders Report, p. 18.
»Korea Daily Comment: Hyundai Electronics«, UBS Warburg, 4. januar 2001, s. 2 (bilag 64 til Micron Italias bemærkninger af 14. februar 2003 efter høringen).
‘Korea Daily Comment: Hyundai Electronics,’ UBS Warburg, 4 January 2001, p. 2 (Micron Italia, 14 February 2003, post-hearing submission, Exhibit 64).
»Hyundai Electronics«, UBS Warburg, 8. januar 2001, s. 7 (bilag 19 til Micron Italias bemærkninger af 14. februar 2003 efter høringen).
‘Hyundai Electronics,’ UBS Warburg, 8 January 2001, p. 7 (Micron Italia, 14 February 2003, post-hearing submission, Exhibit 19).
»Hyundai Electronics Inc. Digging a Deeper Hole«, Deutsche Bank, 23. februar 2001, s. 8 (bilag 66 til Micron Italias bemærkninger af 14. februar 2003 efter høringen).
‘Hyundai Electronics Inc. Digging a Deeper Hole,’ Deutsche Bank, 23 February 2001, p. 8 (Micron Italia, 14 February 2003, post-hearing submission, Exhibit 66).
Korea Herald, 15. februar 2001.
The Korea Herald, 15 February 2001.
Reuters Nyheder, 21. juni 2001.
Reuters News, 21 June 2001.
Korea Herald, 13. juni 2001.
The Korea Herald, 13 June 2001.
CBO'er og CLO'er er værdipapirer, der understøttes af aktiver, og som sælges til investeringsselskaber.
The CBO’s and CLO’s are asset-backed securities that are sold to investment trusts.
Den foreløbige afgørelse, punkt 47-48.
Preliminary Determination, paragraphs 47 and 48.
Idem, punkt 49.
Preliminary Determination, paragraph 49.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.88 og 7.89.
Panel report, paragraphs 7.88 and 7.89.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.194-7.199.
Panel report, paragraphs 7.194 to 7.199.
Se »Direct Intervention by the Government in Supporting Hynix«, Korea Economic Daily, 28. august 2001 (artikel, ifølge hvilken den sydkoreanske nationalforsamling havde erfaret, at KEIC i en brevveksling med Økonomiministeriet var blevet pålagt at støtte Hynix) (bilag 1 til Micron Italias bemærkninger af 14. maj 2003 til den midlertidige forordning).
See ‘Direct Intervention by the Government in Supporting Hynix,’ Korea Economic Daily, 28 August 2001 (reporting on the discovery by the Korean National Assembly of correspondence between the Korean Economic Ministers and the KEIC directing the KEIC to provide assistance to Hynix) (Attachment 1 to Micron Italia’s 14 May 2003 submission on the provisional Regulation).
Som det fremgår af betragtning 53 til den endelige forordning, havde Hynix oprindeligt anmodet om et syndikeret lån på 1000 mia. KRW, men fik kun 800 mia. KRW.
As stated in recital 53 of the definitive Regulation, Hynix had originally requested a syndicated loan of KRW 1 trillion, but was only able to raise KRW 800 billion.
Hvis de tre banker, der stod for 300 mia. af de i alt 800 mia. KRW, ikke kunne have deltaget, fordi den sydkoreanske stat ikke havde givet dem en særlig tilladelse, er det højst usikkert, om de øvrige banker ville have ydet lånet.
If the three banks which accounted for KRW 300 billion of the KRW 800 billion total were unable to participate without the GOK’s specific permission, it is highly speculative that the remaining banks would have gone forward with the loan.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.104.
Panel report, paragraph 7.104.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.97.
Panel report, paragraph 7.97.
Betragtning 17-22, 56 og 57.
Recitals 17 to 22, 56 and 57.
Punkt 77 i den foreløbige afgørelse.
Preliminary Determination, paragraph 77.
KDB deltog ikke i det nye lån på 658 mia. KRW.
The KDB did not participate in the new loan of KRW 658 billion.
Idem., punkt 69-71.«
Preliminary Determination, paragraphs 69 to 71.’
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.204-7.210.
Panel report, paragraphs 7.204 to 7.210.
Se panelrapporten, punkt 7.212 og 7.213, hvor der redegøres for panelets opfattelse, at hele det beløb, der blev ombyttet fra gæld til aktier, ikke nødvendigvis afspejler hele det ombyttede beløb, eftersom Hynix skulle give ejerandele fra sig, eller de eksisterende aktionærers aktier blev udvandet.
See Panel report paragraphs 7.212 and 7.213 which discuss the Panel’s opinion that the full amount of the debt-to-equity swap may not reflect the full amount swapped because of the obligation placed on Hynix, in the form of surrendering ownership shares or in dilution of the shares to existing shareholders.
Betragtning 17-22 og 57-59.
Recitals 17 to 22 and 57 to 59.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.360.
Panel report, paragraph 7.360.
Panelrapporten, punkt 7.362.
Panel report, paragraph 7.362.
Kilde: de fortrolige spørgeskemasvar og fællesskabsproducenternes regnskaber.
Data obtained from the confidential version of the questionnaire responses and the financial statements of the Community producers.
I perioden mellem 1998 og 2001 var der en stigning på 10,5 % i de samlede lønomkostninger pr. time i euroområdet i alle sektorer (bortset fra landbrug, den offentlige administration, uddannelsessektoren, sundhedsvæsenet og andre tjenesteydelser) (se Den Europæiske Centralbanks månedsoversigt for december 2001 og maj 2002).
The total hourly labour costs in the euro area for the whole economy (excluding agriculture, public administration, education, health and other services) increased between 1998 and 2001 by 10,5 % (see ECB Monthly Bulletin for December 2001 and May 2002).
Der var dog mindst én DRAM-producent i Fællesskabet, nemlig Micron, som mærkede til negative indvirkninger, for så vidt angår lønninger og goder, på grund af de finansielle tab, der opstod, da der blev solgt enorme mængder af subsidierede Hynix-indførsler til priser, der lagde kraftigt pres på DRAM-priserne.
However, there were adverse wage and benefit effects suffered by at least one Community DRAM manufacturer, Micron, due to financial losses caused by substantial volumes of subsidised Hynix imports sold at prices that caused substantial DRAM price depression.
I oktober 2001 suspenderede Micron alle lønstigninger og dyrtidsreguleringer.
In October 2001, Micron suspended all wage and cost-of-living increases.
Desuden gik Microns ledelse 20 % ned i løn.
In addition, Micron executives took a 20 % reduction in pay.
Microns overskudsdelingsprogram for ansatte, hvor 10 % af hvert kvartalsoverskud blev delt blandt de ansatte, blev suspenderet, og de ledende medarbejdere gik 10 % ned i løn.
Micron's employee profit sharing programme, whereby 10 % of each quarterly profit is shared with Micron employees, was suspended, and senior staff took a 10 % reduction in pay.
I december 2001 blev alle ansatte desuden sendt på to til tre ugers tvungen ferie, som var ubetalt for ansatte, der allerede havde opbrugt deres årlige ferierettigheder (Microns bemærkninger efter høringen, 18. februar 2003, s. 62).
In addition, in December 2001 all employees were placed on mandatory leave for two to three weeks which, for employees who had already exhausted their annual vacation allowance, was unpaid (Micron post-hearing submission, 18 February 2003, p. 62).
Ud over disse nedgange i løn og goder blev Micron i februar 2003 nødt til at afskedige 10 % (over 1850) af selskabets ansatte (idem), og Infineon var nødt til at reducere antallet af ansatte i fjerde kvartal af 2001 som følge af tabene i forbindelse med de subsidierede indførsler fra Sydkorea (Infineons bemærkninger efter høringen, 14. marts 2003, s. 36).
In addition to these wage and benefit reductions, in February 2003 Micron was compelled to lay off 10 % (more than 1850) of its company-wide workforce (see Micron post-hearing submission), and Infineon ‘was obliged to reduce the number of employees in the fourth quarter of 2001 as a result of the losses related to subsidised imports from Korea.’ (Infineon post-hearing submission, 14 March 2003, p. 36).
Sidste punktum i grundforordningens artikel 8, stk. 5, bestemmer som følger: »Denne opregning [af de relevante økonomiske faktorer, der har indflydelse på erhvervsgrenens situation] er ikke udtømmende, og hverken en eller flere af disse faktorer er nødvendigvis udslagsgivende for afgørelsen.«
Article 8(5) of the basic Regulation states that ‘[t]his list [of relevant economic factors having a bearing on the state of the industry] is not exhaustive, nor can one or several of these factors necessarily give decisive guidance.’
Panelrapport, United States — Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products, WT/DS248/R, WT/DS249/R, WT/DS251/R, WT/DS252/R, WT/DS253/R, WT/DS254/R, WT/DS258/R, WT/DS259/R, vedtaget den 10. december 2003, ændret (af andre årsager) ved Appelinstansens rapport, punkt 10.440 og 10.443.
Report of the Panel, United States — Definitive safeguard measures on imports of certain steel products, WT/DS248/R, WT/DS249/R, WT/DS251/R, WT/DS252/R, WT/DS253/R, WT/DS254/R, WT/DS258/R, WT/DS259/R, adopted December 10, 2003, as modified by the Appellate Body report (on other grounds), paragraphs 10.440 and 10.443.
Panelet konstaterede bl.a., at selv om det nødigt ville foreskrive, hvordan en velbegrundet og passende forklaring kunne se ud, fandt det dog, at USITC f.eks. kunne have påvist, at der ikke var nogen sammenhæng mellem nedgangen i efterspørgslen i undersøgelsesperioden og den forvoldte skade i den konkrete sag.
In particular, the Panel stated: ‘While … reluctant to prescribe what may amount to a reasoned and adequate explanation, the Panel considers that the USITC could have, for example, demonstrated that there was no linkage between demand declines during the period of investigation and injury suffered in this particular case.
USITC kunne nærmere bestemt have forklaret, at overskudsgraden, som muligvis er den mest relevante skadesfaktor i denne forbindelse, aftog uafhængigt af udviklingen i efterspørgslen.
More particularly, the USITC could have explained that operating margin, perhaps the most relevant injury factor in this regard, declined irrespective of demand trends.
Denne analyse kunne være blevet underbygget med en forklaring om, at der samtidig med nedgangen i afkastningsgraden var en stigning i indførslen snarere end en nedgang i efterspørgslen.
This analysis could have been bolstered by an explanation that declines in operating margin coincided with increases in imports rather than declines in demand’ (emphasis added).