natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den pågældende vare er compactdiske til indspilning (CD-R-diske) med oprindelse i Kina, Hongkong og Malaysia, der i 2005 blev tariferet under KN-kode ex85239000.
The product concerned is recordable compact disks (CD-Rs) originating in the PRC, Hong Kong and Malaysia, which was classifiable in 2005 within CN code ex85239000.
Som følge af ændringer i den kombinerede nomenklatur, og da der ikke findes nogen CD-R-diske med en indspilningskapacitet på over 900 megabytes, vil den pågældende vare fra 2006 være tariferet under KN-kode ex85239010.
Due to changes in the Combined Nomenclature and as no CD/Rs exists with a recording capacity exceeding 900 megabytes, from 2006 on, the product concerned falls within CN code ex85239010.
Den pågældende vare fremstilles af polycarbonat, der belægges med et farvelag, et lag af et reflekterende materiale og et beskyttelseslag.
The product concerned is a polycarbonate disc, which is coated with a layer of dye, a layer of reflective material and a protective layer.
Selv om indspilning af sådanne diske kan foretages ad flere omgange, kan de indspillede data ikke slettes.
Although recording on such discs can be done in several steps, the recorded information can not be erased.
Compactdisken er et optisk medium til lagring af digitale data eller digital lyd.
The disc is an optical storage medium for digital data or sound.
CD-R-diske kan inddeles efter typen af de lagrede data (data-CD-R eller musik-CD-R), lagringskapacitet, det reflekterende metallag, og om der er bagsidetryk på CD-R-disken.
CD-Rs can be distinguished according to the type of data stored (data CD-Rs versus music CD-R), the storage capacity, the reflective metal layer and whether or not the CD-Rs are printed upon.
Det fremgår af undersøgelsen, at alle typer CD-R-diske har samme grundlæggende fysiske og tekniske kemiske egenskaber og samme anvendelsesformål.
The investigation has shown that all types of CD-Rs share the same basic physical and technical characteristics and are used for the same purposes.
De kan derfor anses for en og samme vare.
Therefore, they are considered to constitute one single product.
Der fandtes ingen forskelle mellem den pågældende vare og CD-R-diske fremstillet og solgt på hjemmemarkedet i Kina, Hongkong, Malaysia og Japan, der fungerede som referenceland, eller CD-R-diske fremstillet og solgt i Fællesskabet af EF-erhvervsgrenen.
No differences were found between the product concerned and the CD-Rs produced and sold on the domestic market in the PRC, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Japan, which served as an analogue country, as well as the CD-Rs produced and sold in the Community by the Community industry.
De har alle samme grundlæggende fysiske og kemiske egenskaber og anvendelsesformål.
They were all found to have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and uses.
Det konkluderes derfor, at alle typer CD-R-diske udgør én vare og anses for at være samme vare, jf. grundforordningens artikel 1, stk. 4.
It is therefore concluded that all types of CD-Rs form one product and are considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Det fremgik af undersøgelsen, at dumpingniveauet lå over minimumsgrænsen for hver samarbejdsvillig eksporterende producent fra de pågældende lande.
The investigation established a level of dumping of more than de minimis for each of co-operating exporting producers from the countries concerned.
Set i lyset af nedenstående konklusioner er en nærmere udredning af disse resultater imidlertid ikke nødvendig.
However, given the conclusions as set out below, it is not necessary to detail these findings.
EF-produktionen
Community Production
På baggrund af definitionen af EF-erhvervsgren, jf. grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 1, blev produktionen fra nedenstående EF-producenter taget i betragtning for definitionen af EF-produktion i starten af undersøgelsen:
In the light of the definition of Community industry as set out in Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation, the output of the following Community manufacturers was considered for inclusion in the definition of the Community production at the initiation of the investigation:
fem klagende EF-producenter:
Five complainant Community manufacturers:
CDA Datenträger Albrechts GmbH (»CDA«)
CDA Datenträger Albrechts GmbH (‘CDA’)
Global Digital Disc GmbH & Co KG (»GDD«)
Global Digital Disc GmbH & Co KG (‘GDD’)
Manufacturing Advanced Media S.A. (»MAM-E«)
Manufacturing Advanced Media S.A. (‘MAM-E’)
TDK Recording Media Europe S.A. (»TDK«)
TDK Recording Media Europe S.A. (‘TDK’)
To andre EF-producenter, der samarbejdede fuldt ud i undersøgelsen, og som støttede proceduren:
Two other Community producers who fully cooperated in the investigation, and who supported the proceeding:
Sony DADC Austria AG (»Sony DADC«)
Sony DADC Austria AG (‘Sony DADC’)
13 andre producenter, som er opført i klagen, og hvortil der blev fremsendt spørgeskemaer, men hvoraf ingen besvarede disse spørgeskemaer.
Thirteen other manufacturers, as listed in the complaint, to whom questionnaires were sent but none of whom replied to the questionnaire.
Udelukkelse af EF-producenter fra definitionen af EF-produktion på grund af betydelig import under eller efter undersøgelsesperiodens afslutning
Exclusion of Community manufacturers from the definition of Community production for reasons of significant imports during or after the end of the IP
Virksomhed A
Company A
Det fremgik af besvarelsen af spørgeskemaet fra virksomhed A, at denne virksomhed ud over sin egen EF-produktion også havde importeret den pågældende vare fra de pågældende lande.
In the questionnaire response by company A, it appeared that company A, in addition to its own Community manufacturing, also had imported the product concerned from the countries concerned.
Andelen af det importerede produkt, som blev solgt på EF-markedet, oversteg betydeligt den mængde af den samme vare, der blev fremstillet og solgt i Fællesskabet.
The proportion of the imported product sold on the Community market significantly exceeded the volumes of the like product manufactured and sold within the Community.
Det blev herefter overvejet, hvorvidt interessecentret for virksomhed A til trods for den betydelige importmængde fortsat var inden for Fællesskabet og/eller om denne importmængde kunne være af midlertidig karakter.
It was thereafter considered whether, despite the significant import volumes, the centre of interest for company A still was within the Community and/or whether the imported volumes could be of a temporary nature.
Det viste sig, at virksomhed A's import ikke var af midlertidig karakter, men i højere grad udsprang af en strategisk beslutning om at lade sin produktion bestå af produkter fra Original Design Manufacturers (ODM), som er virksomheder, der konstruerer og fremstiller produkter, der sælges under andre varemærker.
It appeared that the imports of company A were not of a temporary nature but rather based on a strategic decision to source its production from Original Design Manufacturers (‘ODM’) which are companies that design and manufacture products that are then sold under other brand names.
Det kan derfor ikke konkluderes, at virksomhed A's interessecentrum for fremstillingen af CD-R-diske fortsat var inden for Fællesskabet, eftersom det kunne formodes, at virksomhed A fortsat ville importere betydelige mængder af sit salg på EF-markedet fra de pågældende lande.
It could therefore not be concluded that company A’s centre of interest for the manufacturing of CD-Rs was still within the Community as it appeared likely that company A would continue to import significant volumes of its sales on the Community market from the countries concerned.
Det blev ligeledes konstateret, at virksomhed A’s salg på EF-markedet i løbet af undersøgelsesperioden i et stort omfang bestod af importerede CD-R-diske.
It was also found that, during the IP, company A’s sales on the Community market consisted to a large majority of imported CD-Rs.
Virksomhed A fremstår således mere som importør end som producent.
This casts company A more as an importer than a producer.
Det blev ligeledes bemærket, at virksomhed A’s hovedkontor og vigtigste forsknings- og udviklingscenter for CD-R-diske var uden for Fællesskabet.
It was also noted that company A’s head office and main R&D centre for CD-Rs are located outside the Community.
Det blev således konkluderet, at virksomhed A ikke skulle være omfattet af definitionen af EF-erhvervsgren, og at dens produktion derfor ikke skulle indgå i definitionen af EF-produktion.
Thus, it was concluded that company A should not be included in the definition of Community industry and that its production should therefore be excluded from the definition of Community production.
Endvidere har virksomhed A trukket sin støtte til klagen tilbage og besluttet at gøre indsigelse mod indførelsen af antidumpingforanstaltninger på import fra de pågældende lande, hvilket bekræfter ovenstående vurdering af virksomhed A’s ændrede interesser.
Furthermore, company A has meanwhile withdrawn its support for the complaint and decided to oppose the imposition of anti-dumping measures on imports from the countries concerned which confirms the above evaluation of company A’s shift of interest.
Virksomhed B
Company B
Det fremgik af besvarelsen af spørgeskemaet fra virksomhed B, at den ud over sin egen EF-produktion også havde importeret den pågældende vare i den betragtede periode.
In the questionnaire response by company B, it appeared that company B, in addition to its own Community manufacturing, had also imported the product concerned during the period considered.
Denne import er dog i løbet af undersøgelsesperioden faldet til under 1 % af virksomhedens samlede salg, hvorfor den blev anset for ubetydelig.
However, during the IP, these imports have decreased to less than 1 % of its total sales and were therefore deemed insignificant.
Kommissionen modtog ligeledes en besvarelse fra en anden virksomhed (»B-Rel«), som viste sig at have samme moderselskab (»virksomhed B-gruppen«) som virksomhed B. Virksomhed B-Rel og virksomhed B betragtes således som forretningsmæssigt forbundne, jf. grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 2.
The Commission also received a questionnaire reply from another company (‘B-Rel’) that turned out to have the same mother company (‘company B-corporation’) as company B. Company B-Rel and company B are thus considered related within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the basic Regulation.
Virksomhed B-Rel, der er virksomhed B-gruppens distributør af CD-R-diske for detailmarkedet i Fællesskabet, har indkøbt alle de CD-R-diske, der er beregnet til detailmarkedet, fra virksomhed B. Desuden har virksomhed B-Rel importeret betydelige mængder fra tredjelande, herunder de pågældende lande.
Being company B-corporation’s distributor of CD-Rs for the retail market in the Community, company B-Rel has purchased all the CD-Rs that are destined for the retail market from company B. In addition, company B-Rel has also imported significant volumes from third countries including the countries concerned.
Når man sammenligner virksomhed B-Rel's salg af CD-R-diske med oprindelse i de pågældende lande med de CD-R-diske, der fremstilles af virksomhed B (der efterfølgende enten blev solgt direkte af virksomhed B til forretningskunder eller solgt gennem virksomhed B-Rel til detailhandlere), fremgår det, at andelen af importerede produkter, der sælges på EF-markedet, for virksomhed B-gruppens vedkommende på betydelig vis oversteg de mængder af den samme vare, der blev fremstillet og solgt på EF-markedet.
When comparing company B-Rel sales of CD-Rs originating in the countries concerned with those manufactured by company B (which subsequently were either sold directly by company B to business customers or sold via company B-Rel to retailers), it appeared that for company B-corporation the proportion of the imported product sold on the Community market significantly exceeded the volumes of the like product manufactured and sold within the Community.
Det blev herefter overvejet, hvorvidt interessecentret for virksomhed B-gruppen til trods for de betydelige importmængder fortsat var inden for Fællesskabet og/eller om disse importmængder kunne være af midlertidig karakter.
It was thereafter considered whether, despite the significant import volumes, the centre of interest for company B-corporation was still within the Community and/or whether the imported volumes could be of a temporary nature.
Resultaterne af undersøgelsen viser, at importen ikke kan anses for at have fundet sted udelukkende på midlertidig basis (eftersom mængden af egenproducerede CD-R-diske ikke vil stige betydeligt i den nærmeste fremtid selv ved en mulig udvidelse af virksomhed B's produktionskapacitet).
The findings of the investigation indicate that the imports could not be considered as being done only on a temporary basis (as the volume of own manufactured CD-R would not increase considerably in the foreseeable future even taking into account possible extension of the production capacity of company B).
Det kunne således formodes, at virksomhed B-gruppen også forsat vil importere fra de pågældende lande med henblik på at dække størstedelen af sit salg på EF-markedet.
Thus, it appeared likely that company B-corporation would also continue to source major parts of its sales on the Community market from the countries concerned.
Det blev ligeledes bemærket, at virksomhed B-gruppens hovedkontor og vigtigste forsknings- og udviklingscenter for CD-R-diske var uden for Fællesskabet.
It was also noted that company B-corporation’s head office and main R&D centre for CD-Rs are located outside the Community.
Det kunne derfor ikke konkluderes, at virksomhed B-gruppens interessecenter for fremstillingen af CD-R-diske befandt sig inden for Fællesskabet.
It could therefore not be concluded that company B-corporation’s centre of interest for the manufacturing of CD-Rs is within the Community.
Det blev således konkluderet, at virksomhed B ikke skulle være omfattet af definitionen af EF-erhvervsgren, og at dens produktion derfor ikke skulle indgå i definitionen af EF-produktion.
Thus, it was concluded that company B should not be included in the definition of Community industry and that its production should therefore be excluded from the definition of Community production.
Virksomhed C
Company C
Kommissionen modtog en spørgeskemabesvarelse fra virksomhed C, der er EF-producent, og fra virksomhed C-Rel, der er distributør af CD-R-diske og etableret i Tyskland.
The Commission received a questionnaire from the Community producer company C as well as from company C-Rel, a distributor of CD-Rs located in Germany.
Det fremgik, at virksomhed C og virksomhed C-Rel er forretningsmæssigt forbundne, jf. grundforordningens artikel 4, stk. 2, da de har samme ejer.
It appeared that company C and company C-Rel are related within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the basic Regulation, as they have the same owner.
I løbet af undersøgelsesperioden distribuerede virksomhed C-Rel CD-R-diske, der blev fremstillet af virksomhed C. I slutningen af undersøgelsesperioden, dvs. fra og med juli 2005, blev det på grundlag af supplerende oplysninger fra alle EF-producenter for perioden fra juli 2005 til februar 2006 konstateret, at virksomhed C-Rel begyndte at importere betydelige (af et omfang svarende til virksomhed C's produktion i undersøgelsesperioden) mængder CD-R-diske fra tredjelande, herunder betydelige mængder fra de pågældende lande.
During the investigation period, company C-Rel was distributing CD-Rs manufactured by company C. However, after the end of the investigation period, i.e. as from July 2005 onwards, on the basis of supplementary information requested from all Community producers for the period July 2005 to February 2006, company C-Rel has been found to have started to import significant (at a level equivalent to the production of company C in the IP) quantities of CD-Rs from third countries including significant volumes from the countries concerned.
For at kontrollere, om denne import var af midlertidig karakter, fremsendte Kommissionen en yderligere anmodning om supplerende oplysninger, denne gang for perioden fra marts 2006 til maj 2006.
In order to verify whether these imports were of a temporary nature, the Commission sent an additional request for supplementary information, this time for the period March 2006 to May 2006.
Da der fortsat blev importeret betydelige mængder, blev det på dette grundlag konkluderet, at denne import ikke var af midlertidig karakter, men udsprang af en strategisk beslutning om at dække en betydelig del af sit fremtidige salg med importerede varer.
On this basis, as significant volumes of imports continued, it had to be concluded that these imports were not of a temporary nature, but rather a strategic decision to source significant parts of its future sales from imports.
Det blev i overensstemmelse med ovennævnte principper og anvendelsen af disse på virksomhed A og B, og eftersom virksomhed C-Rel/virksomhed C vil være beskyttet mod virkningerne af enhver dumpingimport i fremtiden, konkluderet, at virksomhed C ikke skulle indgå i definitionen af EF-produktionen.
In accordance with the principles presented above and applied vis-à-vis companies A and B and given that company C-Rel/company C will be shielded from the effects of any dumped imports in the future, it was concluded that company C should not be included in the definition of the Community production.
Udelukkelse af EF-producenter fra definitionen af EF-produktion på grund af ophørt produktion i løbet af eller efter undersøgelsesperioden
Exclusion of Community manufacturers from the definition of Community production for reasons of cessation of production during or after the end of the IP
Virksomhed D
Company D
Den klagende EF-producent virksomhed D indgav konkursbegæring efter undersøgelsesperioden.
After the end of the IP, the complainant Community producer company D filed for liquidation.
Adskillige parter gjorde gældende, at virksomhed D i henhold til almindelig fællesskabspraksis skulle udelukkes fra definitionen af EF-produktionen.
Several parties argued that, pursuant to Community practice, company D should be excluded from the definition of Community production.
I januar 2006 meddelte kurator, at han havde til hensigt at sælge alle virksomhed D's aktiver, herunder virksomhedens produktionsanlæg.
In January 2006, the liquidator announced its intention to sell all the assets of company D, including all of its production lines.
Klageren meddelte herefter Kommissionen, at et datterselskab til virksomhed D, den klagende EF-producent virksomhed E, ville erhverve produktionsanlæggene fra moderselskabet samt genopstille og anvende dem til fortsat produktion af CD-R-diske hos virksomhed E. Virksomhed E ville til dette formål få tilført ny kapital og blive solgt til tredjemand.
The complainant subsequently informed the Commission that a subsidiary of company D, the complainant Community producer company E, would acquire the production lines of its parent company and would re-install them and utilize them for continuous CD-Rs production at the premises of company E. For this purpose, company E would be re-capitalized and be sold to an external party.
Det kunne således ikke i forbindelse med midtvejsrapporten konkluderes, om virksomhed D skulle udelukkes fra definitionen af EF-produktion, eftersom produktionsanlæggene angiveligt skulle genopstilles og anvendes hos virksomhedens datterselskab i Fællesskabet, virksomhed E.
Thus, at the time of the Interim Report, it could not be concluded that company D should be excluded from the definition of Community production as the production lines allegedly were to be reinstalled and re-utilized at the premises of its Community subsidiary, company E.
Det fremgik af de supplerende oplysninger fra EF-producenterne for perioden fra juli 2005 til maj 2006 (dvs. efter undersøgelsesperioden), at produktionsanlæggene ikke var blevet genopstillet, eftersom produktionen og kapaciteten var på samme niveau som før købet af disse produktionsanlæg.
However, on the basis of supplementary information requested from Community producers for the period July 2005 to May 2006 (i.e. after the IP), this supplementary information showed that production lines indeed had not been reinstalled as production and capacity were in line with those before the acquisition of production lines.
Kommissionen havde desuden ikke modtaget nogen fyldestgørende forretningsplan, der dokumenterede, at virksomhed D’s produktionsanlæg var blevet installeret hos virksomhed E.
Furthermore, no valid business plan had been presented to the Commission’s services that demonstrated that company D’s production lines were being installed at the premises of company E.
Det er almindelig fællesskabspraksis, at producenter, hvis aktiviteter ophører endeligt i løbet af eller efter undersøgelsesperioden, ikke skal være omfattet af definitionen af EF-erhvervsgren, jf. grundforordningens artikel 4.
It is Community practice that manufacturers that definitively cease their production during or after the end of the IP should not be included in the definition of Community industry within the meaning of Article 4 of the basic Regulation.
Virksomhed D’s produktion skal således ikke være omfattet af definitionen af EF-produktionen, eftersom virksomhed D’s produktionsanlæg blev endeligt lukket ned efter undersøgelsesperioden og det ikke er blevet dokumenteret, at disse produktionsanlæg genanvendes andetsteds.
Consequently, company D’s production should be excluded from the definition of the Community production as company D’s production lines closed definitely after the end of IP and it has not been demonstrated that these production lines are again being utilized.
Efter offentliggørelsen af indledningsmeddelelsen meddelte to andre virksomheder, CDA og BOC SA, Kommissionen, at de havde standset deres produktion i Fællesskabet for den nærmeste fremtid.
Subsequent to the publication of the notice of initiation, two further companies, CDA and BOC SA, informed the Commission that they had ceased their production within the Community for the foreseeable future.
CDA og BOC SA blev derfor udelukket fra definitionen af EF-erhvervsgrenen, og deres produktion blev udelukket fra definitionen af EF-produktionen.
Consequently, CDA and BOC SA were excluded from the definition of the Community industry and their production was excluded from the definition of Community production.
Andre EF-producenter
Other Community producers
Klageren indgav en liste med 13 andre EF-producenter.
The complainant had provided a list of 13 other producers in the Community.
Med undtagelse af BOC SA har ingen af disse producenter samarbejdet i undersøgelsen.
With the exception of BOC SA, none of these producers have co-operated during the investigation.
De bør imidlertid tages i betragtning i forbindelse med definitionen af EF-produktionen.
Nevertheless, they should be accounted for when defining Community production.
Produktionen fra disse virksomheder blev på grundlag af oplysningerne i klagen anslået til omkring 264 mio. enheder (for kalenderåret 2004).
On the basis of information in the complaint, the production of these companies has been estimated to be around 264 Mio Units (for calendar year 2004).
Det fremgår af nyere oplysninger fra klageren, at produktionen hos mindst fire af disse andre EF-producenter ophørte i løbet af eller efter undersøgelsesperioden.
Recent information by the complainant suggests that at least four of those other Community producers ceased their production during or after the end of the IP.
Som anført ovenfor skal producenter, hvis produktion ophører endeligt i løbet af eller efter undersøgelsesperioden, ikke indgå i definitionen af EF-erhvervsgren.
As stated above, manufacturers that definitively cease their production during or after the end of the IP should not be included in the definition of the Community industry.
Produktionen fra disse fire virksomheder skal således heller ikke indgå i definitionen af EF-produktion.
Consequently, also the production of these four companies should be excluded from the definition of Community production.