natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
tager med anerkendelse til efterretning, at Revisionsrettens medlemmer ved tiltrædelsen skal afgive erklæringer om deres økonomiske interesser, der er væsentligt mere omfattende og detaljerede end de tilsvarende erklæringer fra Kommissionens eller Parlamentets medlemmer og endog i givet fald også omfatter oplysninger vedrørende ægtefællen; anser det for legitimt, at disse erklæringer ikke offentliggøres; forventer imidlertid, at disse erklæringer gøres tilgængelige for de kompetente instanser, såfremt der indledes undersøgelser mod et medlem af Revisionsretten;
Notes with approval that, when taking office, the Members of the Court of Auditors lodge declarations of their financial interests which are considerably more comprehensive and more detailed than the equivalent declarations by Members of the Commission or MEPs and which furthermore, where appropriate, also include details concerning spouses; regards it as proper that those declarations should not be published; expects the competent authorities to be given access to those declarations, however, if investigations need to be conducted into a Member of the Court;
noterer sig, at Revisionsretten for fremtiden i forbindelse med revision af de administrative udgifter vil evaluere de interne kontrolsystemer, den interne revisors beretninger og et repræsentativt antal transaktioner;
Notes that, when verifying administrative expenditure, the Court of Auditors will in future evaluate internal control systems, internal auditors' reports and a representative number of transactions;
er klar over, at Revisionsrettens revisionserklæring frem for alt er baseret på stikprøvekontrol og derfor ikke er et instrument, hvormed man målrettet kan opklare tilfælde af bedrageri og uregelmæssigheder, men skal give mulighed for at foretage en samlet vurdering af de reviderede organer og institutioners økonomiske forvaltning; minder om, at en sådan samlet vurdering kun er troværdig, hvis stikprøven af reviderede betalinger er tilstrækkelig omfattende;
Realises that the Court of Auditors' statement of assurance is essentially based on sample checks and is therefore not a tool for the targeted detection of fraud and irregularities, but, rather, is intended to allow an overall appraisal to be made of the financial management of the Institutions audited; points out that such an overall appraisal is reliable only if a sufficiently large sample of payments is audited;
opfordrer Revisionsretten til i forbindelse med gennemgangen af den årlige DAS-evaluering at arbejde tæt sammen med de øvrige institutioner for at opstille nogle præstationsindikatorer, der kan måle fremskridtet fra år til år;
Encourages the Court in its review of annual DAS evaluation and to work in close collaboration with the other institutions to provide some form of performance indicators that can measure progress from year to year;
forventer, at Revisionsretten i forbindelse med udarbejdelsen af årsberetningen og den årlige DAS-erklæring sikrer, at dens vurderinger er baseret på de nyeste internationale regnskabsmetoder og -principper;
Expects the Court of Auditors to ensure, in preparing its annual report and annual statement of assurance, that it bases its assessment on the latest international accounting practices and principles;
er forundret over, at Revisionsretten i sin beretning for regnskabsåret 2002 ganske vist angiver størrelsen af stikprøven af reviderede transaktioner inden for landbrug, men end ikke på opfordring ville oplyse om antallet af reviderede transaktioner i forbindelse med institutionernes administrationsudgifter;
Is taken aback that, in its annual report for 2002, the Court of Auditors supplied details of the scale of the sample of the transactions it had audited within agriculture, but, even when asked to do so, was unwilling to provide information as to the number of transactions audited by it in connection with the Institutions' administrative expenditure;
anmoder Revisionsretten om for fremtiden at oplyse om antallet af reviderede transaktioner fordelt på de enkelte institutioner;
Asks the Court of Auditors in future to give the number of transactions audited by it, broken down by Institution;
anmoder Revisionsretten om fremover at tilpasse årsberetningens struktur til finansforordningens artikel 143, stk. 3 og 4, der lyder som følger: "Årsberetningen indeholder en vurdering af, om den økonomiske forvaltning har været forsvarlig.
Asks the Court of Auditors to bring the structure of its annual report, in future, into line with Article 143(3) and (4) of the Financial Regulation, which read as follows: 'The annual report shall contain an assessment of the soundness of financial management.
Revisionsretten kan tilføje enhver form for sammendrag eller generelle bemærkninger, som den finder relevante.";
The Court of Auditors may add any summary report or general observations which it sees fit to make';
minder Retten om, at Parlamentet har brug for oplysninger om hver enkelt EU-institution, da det ellers ikke kan varetage sine opgaver i forbindelse med decharge; beklager, at Rettens årsberetning ikke tager højde for dette og ikke indeholder nogen specifikke informationer om Rådets, Domstolens, Revisionsrettens og Det Europæiske Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalgs administrationsudgifter; anser det heller ikke for berettiget, fordi Retten også hvert eneste år forelægger en særskilt beretning for hvert enkelt decentralt EU-agentur;
Reminds the Court that Parliament requires information on every Community Institution because, otherwise, it cannot perform its discharge duties; regrets the fact that the Court's annual report does not comply with this and contains no specific information whatever on the administrative expenditure of the Council, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors or the Economic and Social Committee; regards this as unwarranted, one reason being that - year in, year out - the Court submits a separate report for every single decentralised Community agency;
glæder sig over, at Revisionsretten har meddelt, at den for fremtiden vil afsætte et særskilt afsnit til hvert enkelt fællesskabsinstitution i sine årsberetninger;
Welcomes the announcement by the Court of Auditors that in its annual reports, in future, it will make provision for a separate section for each Community Institution;
tager til efterretning, at Revisionsretten hidtil gentagne gange har kritiseret enkelttransaktioner i Eurostat;
Notes that the Court of Auditors has repeatedly found fault in the past with individual Eurostat operations;
påpeger, at Eurostat som helhed imidlertid aldrig har været genstand for en dybtgående og omfattende revision fra Rettens side; er bekymret for, at dette også gælder for andre generaldirektorater i Kommissionen og kunne være medvirkende til fejludviklinger inden for Kommissionen;
Points out that to date, however, Eurostat as a whole has never been the subject of an in-depth and comprehensive audit by the Court; is concerned that that is also true of other Commission directorates-general and might be one cause of undesirable developments within the Commission;
er bekymret over, at revisionsberetningerne fra de decentrale revisionsenheder i Kommissionens generaldirektorater hidtil ikke blot er blevet ignoreret af Kommissionens medlemmer, men at heller ikke Revisionsretten har insisteret på en systematisk fremsendelse af sådanne beretninger; anmoder om, at Revisionsretten for fremtiden foretager en indgående evaluering af disse beretninger og offentliggør et sammendrag af de vigtigste begivenheder i sin årsberetning;
Is concerned that, in the past, not only were the audit reports by the decentralised audit units in Commission directorates-general ignored by the Members of the Commission, but, rather, the Court of Auditors did not insist that such reports be systematically forwarded; asks the Court of Auditors to carry out a comprehensive evaluation of those reports in future and to publish a summary of the key results in its annual report;
anmoder Revisionsretten om at udnytte udvidelsen af medlemstallet fra 15 til 25 til, at medlemmerne fremover foretager en mere tilbundsgående revision af hvert enkelt generaldirektorat i Kommissionen;
Asks the Court of Auditors to take advantage of its expansion from 15 to 25 Members to ensure that, in future, its Members carry out an in-depth audit of each and every Commission directorate-general;
ville glæde sig over senest i forbindelse med den kommende årsberetning at erfare, hvilke af Rettens medlemmer der har overtaget revisionsansvaret for hvilke generaldirektorater; anser et sådant specifikt ansvar for at være fuldstændig foreneligt med Rettens kollegiale karakter, sålænge denne får det sidste ord;
Would very much welcome being notified by the Court, at the latest when its next annual report is presented, which Members have taken on special audit responsibility for which directorate-general; regards such specific terms of reference as totally compatible with the collective nature of the Court, provided that the Court has the final say;
anmoder Revisionsretten om at tage sine interne afgørelser vedrørende samarbejdet med OLAF op til fornyet overvejelse på baggrund af bestemmelserne i den nye tjenestemandsvedtægt, især hvad angår medarbejdernes ret til at gå direkte til OLAF med oplysninger; opfordrer Revisionsretten til at fremsende en kopi af de nuværende bestemmelser og de gennemførte ændringer til Parlamentet;
Asks the Court of Auditors to review its internal decisions on cooperation with OLAF in the light of the provisions of the new Staff Regulations, in particular as regards the right of staff to approach OLAF with information directly; calls on the Court of Auditors to forward to Parliament a copy of the currently applicable provisions and the changes which have been made;
anmoder Revisionsretten om en udtalelse om, hvorvidt det i forbindelse med den udbudsprocedure, som ifølge punkt 9.23 i årsberetningen er blevet anvendt af Regionsudvalget, er nødvendigt at inddrage de ansvarlige justitsmyndigheder, fordi der her kunne være tale om en indskrænkning af friheden til at deltage i udbudsprocedurer, som er strafbar i henhold til belgisk lov (artikel 314 i den belgiske straffelov);
Asks the Court of Auditors to comment as to whether, in connection with the awarding procedure at the Committee of Regions described in paragraph 9.23 of its annual report, referral to the competent judicial authorities is necessary, since this might constitute restraint on freedom to participate in tendering procedures, which is a criminal offence under Belgian law (Article 314 of the Belgian Criminal Code);
minder om, at en tjenestemand i Revisionsretten i april 2002 offentligt fremsatte særdeles alvorlige beskyldninger mod medlemmer og ansatte i sin institution;
Points out that, in April 2002, an official of the Court of Auditors publicly made the most serious allegations against Members and officials of his Institution;
minder om, at en del af de beskyldninger, den pågældende fremsatte, allerede var bragt til OLAF's kendskab fra anden side og var genstand for en administrativ undersøgelse;
Points out that some of the allegations made by the official had previously been brought to OLAF's notice by another party or had been the subject of administrative inquiries;
konstaterer, at de resterende beskyldninger fra tjenestemandens side ifølge OLAF ikke har kunnet bekræftes; konstaterer endvidere, at Parlamentet ikke har fået adgang til fakta, der har kunnet så tvivl om OLAF's udsagn;
Notes that, according to OLAF, the other allegations made by the official could not be substantiated; notes further that Parliament has been given access to no evidence which might substantiate doubts as to OLAF's declaration;
tager til efterretning, at tjenestemanden blev afskediget i sommeren 2003 efter afslutningen af en disciplinærprocedure;
Notes that, following disciplinary proceedings, the official was dismissed in summer 2003;
betragter denne afgørelse som en hård sanktion; minder om, at der i henhold til tjenestemandsvedtægtens artikel 90 og 91 kan indgives klage, og at sagen kan indbringes for Domstolen;
Regards that decision as a harsh penalty; points out that, pursuant to Articles 90 and 91 of the Staff Regulations, a complaint may be lodged against it and an appeal may be brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities;
kræver i den forbindelse, at tjenestemandsvedtægten ændres på en sådan måde, at informanter ("whistleblowers") får mulighed for at henvende sig til en instans uden for deres institution, for at sikre, at de forbliver anonyme Vedtagne tekster af 29.1.2004, P5_TA(2004)0049.
Calls in this connection for the Community's staff regulations to be amended so as to make it possible for 'whistle blowers' to turn to a body outside their Institution so as to ensure that their anonymity remains intact Texts Adopted, 29.1.2004, P5_TA(2004)0049.
gør Revisionsretten opmærksom på, at dens adfærd over for tjenestemænd også skal vurderes i lyset af de skridt, Revisionsretten tager i forhold til et tidligere medlem, der menes i alvorlig grad at have tilsidesat sin embedspligt;
Points out to the Court of Auditors that its action against the official must also be gauged against the measures it is taking against a former Member who is alleged to have seriously breached the obligations arising from his office;
glæder sig over, at Revisionsretten anvender de samme bestemmelser i forbindelse med "whistleblowing" som Kommissionen; bemærker, at sådanne bestemmelser kun er rigtigt effektive, hvis de ansatte er opmærksomme på dem; opfordrer Revisionsretten til at sikre, at disse oplysninger gøres frit tilgængelige for personalet;
Is pleased that the Court of Auditors adheres to the same 'whistleblower's doctrine' as the Commission; notes that such a doctrine is only truly effective if staff members are aware of it; encourages the Court of Auditors to ensure that this information is freely available to its staff;
minder om, at OLAF på initiativ af et medlem af Budgetkontroludvalget i 2002 indledte en undersøgelse mod et tidligere medlem af Revisionsretten;
Points out that, on the initiative of a member of the Committee on Budgetary Control, OLAF instituted an inquiry into the former member of the Court of Auditors in 2002;
minder endvidere om, at OLAF efter afslutningen af denne undersøgelse overgav sagen til de luxembourgske justitsmyndigheder, og at denne sag endnu ikke er afsluttet; erkender, at Retten træffer foranstaltninger til at inkassere uretmæssigt anvendte midler;
Points out further that, following on from that inquiry, OLAF referred the matter to the Luxembourg judicial authorities and that those proceedings have not yet been concluded; acknowledges that the Court is pressing ahead with recovering misappropriated monies;
gør Revisionsretten opmærksom på, at sagen sideløbende med den luxembourgske retssag kunne indbringes for EU-domstolen, således som Kommissionen har gjort det med et tidligere medlem af Kommissionen; forventer, at Revisionsretten også inddrager EU-domstolen for i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 247 af få konstateret, om det tidligere medlem i alvorlig grad har tilsidesat sin embedspligt;
Points out to the Court of Auditors that, in tandem with the Luxembourg court proceedings, an application could be made to the European Court of Justice, as the Commission has done in the case of a former Commissioner; expects the Court of Auditors to refer the matter to the European Court of Justice, too, in order to have it established, pursuant to Article 247 of the EC Treaty, whether the former Member seriously breached the obligations arising from his office;
anmoder Retten om at bekræfte, at tjenestebiler, der betales over fællesskabsbudgettet, udelukkende kan benyttes til tjenstlig kørsel;
Asks the Court to confirm that official cars the cost of which is borne by the Community budget can be used exclusively for official journeys;
bemærker, at medlemmer af Revisionsretten efter sigende kan benytte tjenestebiler til private formål inden for en grænse på 40.000 km pr. år, og at åbenbart ikke en gang feriekørsel på skatteydernes regning er udelukket;
Notes that, supposedly, the Members of the Court of Auditors can use official cars for private purposes up to a limit of 40 000 km a year and that even holiday travel at taxpayers' expense is evidently not ruled out;
kræver, at Retten i givet fald inden 1. juli 2004 ændrer sine regler på en sådan måde, at medlemmerne i fuldt omfang selv må afholde udgifterne til ikke-tjenstlig benyttelse ("non-official business") af tjenestebiler;
Calls on the Court, if necessary, to amend its rules by 1 July 2004 so as to require its Members to meet in full the cost of the private use of official cars (non-official business);
gør Retten opmærksom på, at den i henhold til EF-traktatens artikel 276, stk. 3, er forpligtet til at træffe alle egnede foranstaltninger til at efterkomme disse krav;
Draws the attention of the Court to the fact that, pursuant to Article 276(3) of the EC Treaty, it is required to take all appropriate steps to comply with that demand;
konstaterer, at Revisionsrettens medlemmer siden 1. januar 2003 igen har givet sig selv mulighed for at nyde godt af væsentlige vederlagsforhøjelser ved ikke at overføre en del af vederlaget til konti på tjenestestedet Luxembourg, men til konti i andre EU-lande, så de har haft krav på såkaldte justeringskoefficienter; henviser til, at dette begrundes med en afgørelse fra den administrative komité i Domstolen;
Notes that, since 1 January 2003, the Members of the Court have again given themselves the possibility of benefiting from considerable increases in remuneration by having it transferred in part to other EU Member States, and taking advantage of "weightings" in the process, rather than receiving a transfer to accounts in their country of employment, Luxembourg; states that this is defended by citing a corresponding decision by the Administrative Committee of the European Court of Justice;
minder endvidere om, at denne afgørelse fra den administrative komité i Domstolen blev truffet den 25. september 2002, men at Parlamentet og Rådet efterfølgende på forslag af Rådet har ladet en anmærkning udgå af det foreløbige forslag til Domstolens budget for regnskabsåret 2003 (budgetpost A-1090), ifølge hvilken denne justeringskoefficient skulle anvendes på domstolens medlemmer analogt med bestemmelserne i tjenestemandsvedtægten;
Points out furthermore that that decision by the Court of Justice's Administrative Committee was taken on 25 September 2002, but that, on a proposal by the Council, Parliament and the Council subsequently deleted a remark from the Court of Justice's 2003 preliminary draft budget (Item A-1090) which provided for weightings to be applied, 'by analogy' with the provisions of the Staff Regulations of Officials, to the Members of the Court of Justice too;
minder om, at Kommissionens medlemmer ikke længere gør krav på justeringskoefficienter; opfordrer Revisionsrettens medlemmer til at følge dette eksempel;
Points out that the Members of the Commission no longer claim weightings; calls on the Members of the Court of Auditors to follow that example ;
opfordrer Budgetudvalget til at opføre en del af Revisionsrettens driftsbevillinger for 2005 i reserven, hvis der ikke reageres tilfredsstillende på de bekymringer, der gives udtryk for i denne beslutning med hensyn til benyttelse af tjenestebiler til ikke-tjenstlige formål og anvendelse af justeringskoefficienter på vederlag;
Invites its Committee on Budgets to place part of the 2005 administrative appropriations for the Court of Auditors in reserve if there is no satisfactory response to the concerns raised in this resolution over non-official car use and the system of salary weightings;
Europa-Parlamentets afgørelse om decharge for gennemførelsen af Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 2002 - Sektion VI – Det Europæiske Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg (I5-0034/2003 – C5-0088/2004 -2003/2215(DEC))
European Parliament decision concerning discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2002 financial year - Section VI - European Economic and Social Committee (I5-0034/2003 – C5-0088/2004 - 2003/2215(DEC))
meddeler decharge til Det Europæiske Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalgs generalsekretær for gennemførelsen af budgettet for regnskabsåret 2002;
Grants the Secretary-General of the European Economic and Social Committee discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the 2002 financial year;
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning med bemærkningerne til afgørelsen om decharge for gennemførelsen af Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 2002 - Sektion VI – Det Europæiske Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg (I5-0034/2003 – C5-0088/2004 -2003/2215(DEC))
European Parliament resolution containing the comments accompanying the decision concerning discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2002 financial year - Section VI - European Economic and Social Committee (I5-0034/2003 – C5-0088/2004 - 2003/2215(DEC))
der henviser til forvaltningsregnskab og balance for regnskabsåret 2002 (I5-0034/2003 – C5-0088/2004 ),
having regard to the revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet for the 2002 financial year (I5–0034/2003 – C5-0088/2004 ),
tager de svar til efterretning, Det Europæiske Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg (ØSU) sendte den 17. december 2003 som reaktion på det spørgeskema, Budgetkontroludvalget sendte den 26. november 2003;
Notes the replies given by the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) on 17 December 2003 to the questionnaire sent by the Committee on Budgetary Control on 26 November 2003;
takker ØSU for fremsendelsen af de interne bestemmelser om gennemførelsen af budgettet og beskrivelsen af den interne revisors opgaver;
Thanks the EESC for forwarding its internal rules governing budget implementation and the charter of the internal auditor;
noterer sig, at Det Europæiske Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg har forsikret, at der ikke siden er forekommet nogen form for uregelmæssigheder ved afregning af rejseudgifter;
Notes the EESC's assurance that there have been no further irregularities whatever with regard to the settlement of travel expenses;
noterer sig, at Det Europæiske Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg den 10. december 2003 vedtog en statut for medlemmerne; anmoder Revisionsretten om at udtale sig om de finansielle virkninger af de deri indeholdte bestemmelser og forelægge sin udtalelse senest i forbindelse med årsberetningen for 2003;
Notes that, on 10 December 2003, the EESC adopted a statute for its Members; asks the Court of Auditors for an opinion on the financial implications of the provisions thereof; asks the Court of Auditors to submit that opinion no later than in the context of its annual report for 2003;
; er overbevist om, at en kritisk evaluering af aktiviteterne kan være udgangspunkt for, at ØSU's arbejde bliver tydeliggjort for offentligheden;
; is convinced that a critical evaluation of activities can be the basis for better public awareness of the EESC's work;
takker ØSU for beretningen af 26. juni 2003 om fremskridt i forbindelse med istandsættelsen af Belliard-Bygningen Notat til Budgetkontroludvalget, situationsberetning om Belliard-Bygningen af 26.6.2003.
Thanks the EESC for the progress report of 26 June 2003 Note to the Committee on Budgetary Control, Belliard building progress report, 26.6.2003.
; henviser til, at Belliard-Bygningen ifølge denne beretning overdrages den 31. maj 2004; anmoder dog om en redegørelse for finansinspektørens udtalelse om budgetgennemførelsen i 2002: "svagheder i forvaltningen af Belliard-sagen, der medførte en manglende styring fra udvalgenes side af visse af sagens aspekter, er blevet konstateret og påpeget."
on renovating the Belliard Building, according to which it will be handed over on 31 May 2004; asks, however, for an explanation of the Financial Controller's comment on 2002 budget implementation that 'Shortcomings in the management of the 'Belliard' dossier, meaning that the Committees had a lack of oversight of certain aspects, were noted and pointed out.'
Svar på spørgeskema, spørgsmål 4, generel del.
Reply to questionnaire, question 4, general section.