natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
er opmærksom på, at det faktiske omfang af momsunddragelse og -svig er svært at vurdere, da mange medlemsstater enten ikke indsamler eller ikke offentliggør data; bemærker, at tab af momsindtægter ifølge Revisionsrettens skøn beløb sig til 17 mia. EUR i Tyskland i 2005 og 18,2 mia. EUR i Det Forenede Kongerige for skatteåret 2005-2006; bemærker endvidere, at omfanget af momssvig kan overstige Fællesskabets samlede årlige budget;
Is aware of the fact that the actual volume of VAT evasion and fraud is difficult to assess, as many Member States either do not collect or do not publish data; notes that according to estimates quoted by the Court of Auditors, VAT revenue losses amounted to EUR 17 billion in Germany for 2005 and EUR 18,2 billion in the UK for the tax year 2005-2006; notes that the volume of VAT fraud could exceed the volume of the Community's total annual budget;
ser positivt på Kommissionens initiativ om at indlede en undersøgelse for at få et pålideligt skøn over omfanget af skattesvig, herunder momssvig, i de forskellige medlemsstater; opfordrer Kommissionen til at informere Parlamentets kompetente udvalg om resultatet af undersøgelsen, så snart det foreligger;
Welcomes the Commission's initiative to launch a study to obtain solid estimates of the amount of tax fraud, including VAT fraud, in the different Member States; invites the Commission to inform Parliament's competent committees of the findings of the study as soon as they are available;
opfordrer indtrængende Rådet og Kommissionen til i højere grad at prioritere udviklingen af en fælles fremgangsmåde til at kvantificere og analysere momssvig, som også skal gøre det muligt at vurdere, om de skridt, medlemsstaterne tager til bekæmpelse af momsunddragelse og -svig, har nogen positiv effekt, eller om de blot medfører en forskydning af momssvig til andre økonomiske sektorer eller medlemslande;
Urges the Council and the Commission to give a higher priority to the development of a common approach in order to quantify and analyse VAT fraud, which should allow assessment as to whether measures taken by Member States against VAT evasion and fraud are successful, or whether they just trigger a displacement of VAT fraud to other economic sectors or Member States;
anmoder Rådet, Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne om helt og fuldt at tage højde for anbefalingerne fra Kontaktkomitéen for de Overordnede Revisionsorganer i Den Europæiske Union fra december 2007, som indeholder forslag til, hvordan medlemsstaterne ville kunne forbedre deres beregninger, og hvordan der ville kunne skabes én enkelt model for beregning af momssvig;
Requests the Council, the Commission and the Member States to fully take into account the recommendations of the Contact Committee of the Supreme Audit Institutions of the European Union of December 2007, which include proposals as to how Member States could improve their estimates and how a single model for the estimation of VAT fraud could be established;
er bekymret over de mangler, Revisionsretten har fundet, for så vidt angår medlemsstaternes administrative samarbejde vedrørende moms;
Is concerned about the shortcomings identified by the Court of Auditors as regards administrative cooperation between Member States in the field of VAT;
er bekymret over, at Revisionsretten i nogle medlemsstater fandt, at der manglede grundlæggende krav til effektivt samarbejde; bemærker navnlig følgende mangler:
Is worried at the Court of Auditors' observation that in some Member States basic requirements for effective cooperation were missing; notes the following deficiencies in particular:
næsten halvdelen af anmodningerne om oplysninger fra en medlemsstat til en anden blev ikke besvaret inden for den nuværende tidsfrist på tre måneder
almost half of the requests for information from one Member State to another were not answered within the current three-month deadline,
den organisatoriske indretning af de centrale forbindelseskontorer, dvs. de vigtigste kanaler til udveksling af oplysninger, bidrog til forsinkelser; Italien og Nederlandene delte deres centrale forbindelseskontorer mellem flere afdelinger uden at koordinere dem effektivt, og Tyskland opdelte sit centrale forbindelseskontor i flere tjenester uden at informere de andre medlemsstater ordentligt herom
the organisational set up of the central liaison offices (CLO), i.e. the main channels for information exchange, contributed to delays; Italy and the Netherlands split their CLOs between several departments without coordinating them effectively and Germany split its CLO into several services without informing the other Member States properly,
der er betydelige forskelle i antallet af anmodninger om oplysninger, som en medlemsstat hævder at have modtaget, og antallet af anmodninger, som andre medlemsstater hævder at have sendt til denne; Italien hævdede at have modtaget 54 % anmodninger færre og Tyskland 32 % anmodninger flere, end andre medlemsstater hævdede at have fremsendt til dem i 2005;
there are significant differences between the number of requests for information which a Member State claims to have received and the number of requests other Member States claim to have sent to it; Italy claimed to have received 54 % requests less and Germany 32 % requests more than other Member States claimed to have sent to them in 2005;
og til forordning (EF) nr. 1798/2003, og som har til hensigt at stramme tidsfristerne for indsamlingen og udvekslingen af oplysninger, kun vil opnå fuld virkning, hvis de medlemsstater, der endnu ikke har gjort det, opretter overvågningsmekanismer, der skal sikre rettidige svar på anmodninger; anmoder Kommissionen om at informere Parlamentet om, hvilke fremskridt der er gjort i de enkelte medlemsstater med hensyn til at etablere overvågningsmekanismer, og vurdere deres effektivitet;
and to Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 aiming at shortening the deadlines for the collection and the exchange of information will only produce their full effects if Member States which have not yet done so set up monitoring mechanisms to ensure timely answers to requests; requests the Commission to inform it about the progress made by individual Member States in setting up the monitoring mechanisms and to assess their effectiveness;
opfordrer Rådet til at tage fat på det problem, at der er forskel på det antal anmodninger om oplysninger, som en medlemsstat hævder at have modtaget, og det antal anmodninger, andre medlemsstater hævder at have indsendt, og prioritere en hurtig løsning;
Calls on the Council to address the discrepancy between the number of requests for information which a Member State claims to have received and the number of requests other Member States claim to have sent to it, and to solve this problem as a matter of urgency;
anbefaler Kommissionen, at medlemsstaterne inden for rammerne af deres nationale reformprogrammer under Lissabonstrategien rapporterer om gennemførelsen af datakrav over for andre medlemsstater; mener, at det, i de tilfælde hvor tilvejebringelse af data fra en medlemsstat til en anden systematisk er forsinket, er vigtigt, at Kommissionen indleder overtrædelsesprocedurer over for den medlemsstat, som forsinker tilvejebringelsen af data;
Recommends to the Commission that, within their national reform programmes under the Lisbon strategy, Member States report on the implementation of data requirements towards other Member States; considers it important, where data provision from one Member State to another is subject to systematic delay, that infringement procedures be initiated by the Commission against the Member State that delays the provision of data;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at fremme yderligere udveksling af bedste praksis og samarbejde mellem medlemsstaterne vedrørende de organisatoriske ordninger for det administrative samarbejde;
Calls on the Commission to facilitate further exchange of best practices and coordination between Member States as regards the organisational arrangements for administrative cooperation;
opfordrer medlemsstaterne til fuldt ud at udnytte muligheden for at uddelegere ansvaret for udveksling af oplysninger til lokale skattekontorer for at fremskynde og forbedre samarbejdets kvalitet; bemærker, at Kommissionen stillede en sikret elektronisk informationskanal mellem lokale kontorer i de forskellige medlemsstater til rådighed i 2007;
Invites Member States to fully exploit the possibility of delegating competences as regards information exchange to local tax offices in order to speed up and improve the quality of cooperation; notes that a secured electronic information channel between local offices in different Member States was made available by the Commission in 2007;
anerkender, at det administrative samarbejde på EU-plan er et væsentligt redskab i bekæmpelsen af skatteunddragelse; opfordrer medlemsstaterne til fuldt ud at udnytte muligheden for at etablere et effektivt administrativt samarbejde mellem lokale skattekontorer, bl.a. gennem anvendelse af elektroniske kommunikationsmidler;
Recognises that administrative cooperation at EU level is an essential tool for combating tax fraud; encourages Member States to exploit fully the possibility of setting up effective administrative cooperation between local tax offices, including by means of electronic communication;
bemærker, at Belgien iværksatte Eurocanet (Det Europæiske Karruselnetværk) for at forbedre den spontane udveksling af oplysninger; bemærker endvidere, at 24 medlemsstater deltager i denne udveksling af oplysninger om virksomheder, der mistænkes for "missing trader"-svig (stråmandsselskab);
Notes that Belgium founded the Eurocanet (European Carousel Network) in order to improve the spontaneous exchange of information; notes that, meanwhile, 24 Member States participate in this exchange of information on companies suspected of being involved in missing trader fraud;
bemærker, at Eurocanet ifølge eksperter sætter skattemyndighederne i stand til hurtigere at opdage momssvig, da det giver mulighed for en omfattende udveksling af oplysninger, bruger de belgiske myndigheder som et centralt koordineringspunkt og muliggør inddragelse af de operationelle administrative tjenester til bekæmpelse af svig;
Notes that, according to experts, Eurocanet enables tax administrations to detect VAT fraud quicker as it provides for a comprehensive information exchange, uses the Belgian authorities as a central coordinating point and provides for the involvement of operational administrative anti-fraud services;
bemærker dog, at Eurocanets effektivitet er mindsket som følge af, at tre store medlemsstater, Tyskland, Italien og Det Forenede Kongerige, ikke deltager; opfordrer Tyskland, Italien og Det Forenede Kongerige til at tilslutte sig Eurocanet;
Observes however that the efficiency of Eurocanet is reduced by the fact that three big Member States, Germany, Italy and the UK, do not participate; calls on Germany, Italy and the UK to join Eurocanet;
er bekymret over, at Revisionsretten fandt alvorlige svagheder i momsinformationsudvekslingssystemet, VIES, på grund af forsinkelser i indsamlingen og indlæsningen af oplysninger og problemer med at rette forkerte oplysninger; anmoder medlemsstaterne og Kommissionen om at afhjælpe disse svagheder hurtigst muligt og inden udgangen af 2008;
Is worried at the Court of Auditors' detection of serious weaknesses in the VAT Information Exchange System (VIES) due to delays in collecting and capturing data and problems in correcting wrong data; requests Member States and the Commission to remedy these weaknesses as a matter of urgency by the end of 2008;
forstår ikke, hvorfor medlemsstaterne, på trods af Kommissionens indsats for at fremme en aftale endnu ikke har aftalt fælles kriterier for annullering af momsregistreringsnumre, selv om muligheden for en hurtig inddragelse af et momsregistreringsnummer er et afgørende element i forbindelse med at stoppe og forhindre momssvig;
Fails to understand why Member States, despite the Commission's efforts to facilitate an agreement, still have not agreed on common criteria for the cancellation of VAT numbers, although the possibility for a quick withdrawal of a VAT number is an essential element in stopping and preventing VAT fraud;
beklager, at medlemsstaterne ikke i tilstrækkeligt omfang anvender parallelle, multilaterale kontroller, til trods for at Fællesskabet stiller midler til rådighed hertil, og at der ifølge Revisionsretten kan opnås gode resultater;
Regrets that simultaneous, multilateral controls are not sufficiently used by Member States, although the Community provides for their funding and the Court of Auditors reports that good results can be achieved;
beklager, navnlig på baggrund af ovennævnte mangler i Tyskland, som Revisionsretten har påpeget, at Tyskland ikke imødekom en anmodning fra Revisionsretten om at måtte foretage revision; støtter Revisionsrettens holdning, nemlig at Tysklands afslag er en overtrædelse af dets forpligtelser i henhold til EF-traktaten; konstaterer, at Kommissionen har indledt en overtrædelsesprocedure mod Tyskland ved Domstolen; opfordrer Revisionsretten til at udføre den planlagte revision i Tyskland, hvis Domstolen fastslår, at der er tale om en overtrædelse;
Regrets, particularly in the light of the above-mentioned shortcomings observed by the Court of Auditors with regard to Germany, that Germany did not comply with the Court of Auditors' audit request; supports the Court of Auditors' view that Germany's refusal constitutes a breach of its obligations under the EC Treaty; notes that the Commission has started infringement proceedings before the Court of Justice against Germany; invites the Court of Auditors to carry out the planned audit in Germany in the case of a finding of infringement by the Court of Justice;
bemærker, at Rådets Fiskalgruppe drøftede Revisionsrettens særberetning; opfordrer Rådet til inden december 2008 at vedtage formelle konklusioner vedrørende resultaterne af Revisionsrettens undersøgelser, som tilfældet er i forbindelse med de andre særberetninger under Kommissionens dechargeprocedure;
Notes that the Council's working party on tax questions discussed the Court of Auditors" Special Report; invites the Council to adopt formal conclusions regarding the Court of Auditors" findings, as it is done for the other Special Reports during the Commission discharge procedure, before December 2008;
Opfølgning af resultaterne af Revisionsrettens undersøgelser, for så vidt angår ny fællesskabslovgivning
Follow-up to the Court of Auditors' findings in terms of new Community legislation
glæder sig over Kommissionens forslag til ændring af momsdirektivet Direktiv 2006/112/EF.
Welcomes the Commission's proposals for amendment of the VAT Directive Directive 2006/112/EC.
og forordningen om administrativt samarbejde vedrørende merværdiafgift Forordning (EF) nr. 1798/2003.
and of the VAT Administrative Cooperation Regulation Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003.
, der skal fremme indsamling og udveksling af oplysninger om transaktioner inden for Fællesskabet fra 2010, og opfordrer indtrængende Rådet til hurtigt at vedtage de foreslåede foranstaltninger;
designed to speed up the collection and exchange of information on intra-Community transactions from 2010 onwards, and urges the Council to adopt the proposed measures quickly;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at forelægge yderligere forslag med henblik på at styrke medlemsstaternes evne til at inddrive ikke-betalt moms ved at indføre regler om, at handlende hæfter solidarisk for tab af skatteindtægter, i tilfælde hvor deres manglende overholdelse af indberetningspligten har åbnet mulighed for svig;
Invites the Commission to submit further proposals aimed at reinforcing Member States' ability to collect non-paid VAT by making traders jointly and severally liable for tax losses in cases where their non-compliance with reporting obligations facilitated the fraud;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at forelægge yderligere forslag om automatisk adgang for alle øvrige medlemsstater til visse ikke-følsomme oplysninger, som medlemsstaterne ligger inde med om egne afgiftspligtige personer, og om harmonisering af procedurerne for registrering og afregistrering af momspligtige personer for at sikre, at falske afgiftspligtige personer hurtigt opdages og afregistreres;
Invites the Commission to submit further proposals on automated access by all other Member States to certain non-sensitive data held by Member States on their own taxable persons and on the harmonisation of procedures for the registration and de-registration of persons liable for VAT to ensure the swift detection and de-registration of counterfeit taxable persons;
bemærker, at Kommissionen i henhold til forordning (EF) nr. 1798/2003 evaluerer det administrative samarbejde og samler medlemsstaternes erfaringer; bemærker endvidere, at Kommissionen har til hensigt at oprette et overvågningssystem med kvantificerbare indikatorer for at vurdere, om de enkelte medlemsstater er i stand til at yde hinanden effektiv bistand og rent faktisk også gør det; anmoder Kommissionen om at få forelagt en situationsrapport, inden den forestående dechargeprocedure påbegyndes;
Notes that, under Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003, the Commission evaluates the functioning of administrative cooperation and pools Member States' experience; notes the Commission's intention to set up a monitoring system with quantifiable indicators in order to assess whether Member States are able and actually do provide efficient assistance to each other; requests the Commission to inform Parliament of the state of play before the start of the forthcoming discharge procedure;
bemærker, at Kommissionen ikke har adgang til de oplysninger, der udveksles i henhold til forordning (EF) nr. 1798/2003, men at dens rolle er begrænset til vedligeholdelse og udvikling af kommunikationsnetværket; er enig med Revisionsretten i, at dette hæmmer Kommissionens mulighed for at finde årsagerne til problemerne og foreslå løsninger;
Notes that the Commission has no access to the content of information exchanged under Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003, but that its role is limited to the maintenance and development of the communication network; agrees with the Court of Auditors that this hampers the Commission's ability to detect the reasons for problems and to put forward solutions;
bemærker, at medlemsstaterne nægter at give Kommissionen (OLAF) adgang til de data, der udveksles i henhold til forordning (EF) nr. 1798/2003, og til data, der udveksles inden for Eurocanet; noterer sig endvidere Kommissionens (OLAF) holdning, nemlig at den, hvis den fik adgang til oplysningerne, ville tilføre en betydelig merværdi i form af analyser af tendenser og nyligt afslørede tilfælde af svig ud fra et EU-perspektiv;
Notes that Member States refuse to grant the Commission (OLAF) access to the content of the data exchanged under Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 and to data exchanged in the framework of Eurocanet; notes the position of the Commission (OLAF) that, if it was granted access to the data, it would generate significant added value by providing analysis on trends and newly detected fraudulent schemes from a Community perspective;
bemærker, at Europol oprettede en analysedatabase om "missing trader"-svig inden for Fællesskabet i april 2008, der har til formål at identificere svindlere, afdække deres kriminelle netværk og analysere de mest almindelige former for "missing trader"-svig inden for Fællesskabet;
Notes that Europol opened an analytical work file on missing trader intra-Community fraud in April 2008, which aims at identifying the organisers of fraud, uncovering their criminal networks and analysing the most common forms of missing trader intra-Community fraud;
noterer sig konklusionerne fra Rådets (økofin) møde den 7. oktober 2008, hvor man blev enige om at oprette en ny mekanisme for at forbedre samarbejdet mellem medlemsstaterne med henblik på at bekæmpe momssvig, den såkaldte Eurofisc; noterer sig, at Eurofisc skulle bygge på Eurocanet; noterer sig endvidere, at Eurofisc ifølge retningslinjerne fra Rådet (økofin) skulle være et decentraliseret netværk for udveksling af oplysninger mellem medlemsstater, skulle inddrage alle medlemsstater på frivillig basis og skulle organiseres efter aftale mellem de deltagende medlemsstater med støtte fra Kommissionen;
Notes the conclusions of the ECOFIN Council of 7 October 2008, which agreed to establish a new mechanism to improve cooperation between Member States in order to combat VAT fraud, the so-called "Eurofisc"; notes that Eurofisc would build on Eurocanet; further notes that, according to the guidelines adopted by the ECOFIN Council, Eurofisc would be a decentralised network for the exchange of information between Member States, would involve all Member States on a voluntary basis and would be organised by agreement of the participating Member States, with the support of the Commission;
er enig i, at der er behov for kraftige politiske impulser for at opnå væsentlige forbedringer i samarbejdet om bekæmpelse af momssvig; er imidlertid overbevist om, at indførelsen af Eurofisc kun kan tilføre en merværdi, hvis det er obligatorisk for alle medlemsstater at deltage, så man undgår de samme vanskeligheder som i forbindelse med Eurocanet, og hvis Kommissionen deltager helt og fuldt i Eurofisc's aktiviteter og spiller en koordinerende rolle;
Agrees that a strong political impetus is needed in order to achieve substantial improvements in cooperation in the fight against VAT fraud; is, however, convinced that the introduction of Eurofisc can only provide added value if participation in it is compulsory for all Member States in order to avoid the problems encountered by Eurocanet and if the Commission fully participates in the activities of Eurofisc and plays a coordinating role;
anmoder Rådet om at fortsætte forhandlingerne om forslaget til en forordning om gensidig administrativ bistand til bekæmpelse af svig, der rammer Det Europæiske Fællesskabs økonomiske interesser, herunder momssvig, som vil udstikke detaljerede rammer for tværfagligt administrativt samarbejde om bekæmpelse af svig;
Asks the Council to continue negotiations on the proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance in the fight against fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Community, including VAT fraud, which would provide a detailed framework for multidisciplinary administrative anti-fraud cooperation;
opfordrer Kommissionens ansvarlige tjenestegrene, GD Beskatning og Toldunion og Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) til at oprette en task force, der skal undersøge følgende:
Invites the Commission's responsible services, DG Taxation and Customs Union and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), to create a task force in order to examine the following questions:
Hvordan kan Kommissionen opnå en synergieffekt mellem de forskellige tjenester, der arbejder med bekæmpelse af momssvig, for at undgå dobbeltarbejde og konkurrence mellem de forskellige tjenester?
how can the Commission achieve synergies between the different services working on the fight against VAT fraud in order to avoid duplication of work and competition between different services?
I hvilket omfang bør Kommissionen have adgang til de oplysninger, der udveksles mellem medlemsstaterne?
to what extent should the Commission be granted access to the content of information exchanged between Member States?
Kan Kommissionen blive et centralt koordineringsorgan for administrativt samarbejde mellem medlemsstaterne og i bekræftende fald hvordan?
could the Commission become a central coordinating body for administrative cooperation between Member States, and if so how?
Hvordan bør Kommissionens aktiviteter til bekæmpelse af momssvig kædes sammen med Europols og Eurojusts aktiviteter?
how should the Commission's activities in fighting VAT fraud relate to the activities of Europol and Eurojust?
Øget samarbejde mellem de retlige myndigheder
Stepping up cooperation between judicial authorities