natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
påpeger, at Domstolen i en række afgørelser har accepteret, at tildeling af eksklusive rettigheder til en enkelt operatør under tæt myndighedskontrol kan være et middel til at forbedre beskyttelsen af forbrugerne mod svig og bekæmpe kriminalitet inden for onlinespillesektoren mere effektivt;
Points out that the European Court of Justice has accepted in a number of rulings that granting exclusive rights to a single operator subject to tight public-authority control may be a means of improving protection of consumers against fraud and combating crime in the online gambling sector more effectively;
påpeger, at der ved onlinespil er tale om en økonomisk virksomhed af særlig art, som ikke ubetinget kan være omfattet af reglerne om det indre marked, navnlig om fri etableringsret og fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser; anerkender imidlertid Domstolens faste praksis, der understreger, at nationale kontroller bør vedtages og anvendes på en konsistent, forholdsmæssig og ikke-diskriminerende måde;
Points out that online gambling is a special kind of economic activity, to which internal market rules, namely freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, cannot fully apply; recognises, however, the consistent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union which emphasises that national controls should be enacted and applied in a consistent, proportionate and non-discriminatory manner;
understreger dels, at udbydere af onlinespil til enhver tid skal efterleve den nationale lovgivning i de lande, hvor de pågældende spil udbydes, og dels, at medlemsstaterne bevarer retten til at træffe foranstaltninger for at kunne gribe ind over for ulovlige onlinespil med det formål at håndhæve national lovgivning og spærre adgangen til markedet for ulovlige spil;
Stresses, on the one hand, that providers of online gambling should in all cases respect the national laws of the countries in which those games operate and, on the other hand, that Member States should retain the right to impose measures to address illegal online gambling in order to implement national legislation and exclude illegal providers from market access;
mener, at princippet om gensidig anerkendelse af licenser ikke finder anvendelse i spillesektoren, men kræver i overensstemmelse med principperne for det indre marked dog, at medlemsstater, der åbner sektoren for onlinespil for konkurrence for alle eller visse typer af spil, sikrer gennemskuelighed og muliggør ikke-diskriminatorisk konkurrence; foreslår i denne forbindelse, at medlemsstaterne indfører en licensmodel, der gør det muligt for de europæiske udbydere af spil, der opfylder værtsmedlemsstatens betingelser, at ansøge om en licens; mener, at procedurer til ansøgning om licens, der reducerer de administrative byrder ved at undgå den unødvendige duplikering af krav og kontroller udført i andre medlemsstater, kan gennemføres i de medlemsstater, der har indført et licenssystem, idet det sikres, at tilsynsmyndighederne i den medlemsstat, hvor ansøgningen er indgivet, spiller en styrende rolle; mener derfor, at den gensidige tillid blandt de nationale tilsynsmyndigheder skal forbedres gennem et tættere administrativt samarbejde; respekterer medlemsstaternes afgørelse om at fastlægge antallet af udbydere samt af typer og mængder af spil, der udbydes for at beskytte forbrugerne og hindre kriminalitet, forudsat at disse begrænsninger er proportionale og afspejler et ønske om at begrænse aktiviteterne i denne sektor på konsistens og systematisk vis;
Is of the opinion that the principle of mutual recognition of licences in the gambling sector does not apply, but nevertheless, in keeping with internal market principles, insists, that Member States which open up the online gambling sector to competition for all or certain types of online gambling must ensure transparency and make non-discriminatory competition possible; suggests, in this instance, that Member States introduce a licensing model which makes it possible for European gambling providers meeting the conditions imposed by the host Member State to apply for a licence; licence application procedures, which reduce administrative burdens by avoiding the unnecessary duplication of requirements and controls carried out in other Member States, could be set up in those Member States that have implemented a licensing system, while ensuring the pre-eminent role of the regulator in the Member State in which the application has been submitted; takes the view, therefore, that mutual confidence among national regulators needs to be enhanced through closer administrative cooperation; respects, furthermore, the decision of some Member States to determine the number of operators, types and quantities of games on offer, in order to protect consumers and prevent crime, on condition that those restrictions are proportionate and reflect a concern to limit activities in that sector in a consistent and systematic manner;
opfordrer – i overensstemmelse med princippet om »aktiv subsidiaritet« – Kommissionen til at undersøge alle mulige redskaber og foranstaltninger, der på EU-plan sigter mod at beskytte sårbare forbrugere, hindre ludomani og bekæmpe ulovlige udbydere af spil, herunder et formaliseret samarbejde mellem de nationale regulerende myndigheder, fælles standarder for udbydere og et rammedirektiv; mener, at en fælles europæisk adfærdskodeks for onlinespil, aftalt mellem regulerende myndigheder og udbyderne, vil kunne være et første skridt;
Calls on the Commission to explore – in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ – all possible tools or measures at the EU level designed to protect vulnerable consumers, prevent addiction and combat illegal operators in the field of gambling, including formalised cooperation between national regulators, common standards for operators or a framework directive; is of the opinion that a pan-European code of conduct for online gambling agreed between regulators and operators could be a first step;
mener, at en fælles europæisk adfærdskodeks for onlinespil bør omhandle både udbydernes og forbrugernes rettigheder og forpligtelser; mener, at denne adfærdskodeks bør bidrage til at sikre ansvarlige spil, et højt beskyttelsesniveau for spillerne, navnlig for mindreårige og andre sårbare personer, støtte mekanismer til bekæmpelse af internetkriminalitet, svig og vildledende reklame både på EU-niveau og nationalt og i sidste ende skabe en ramme af principper og regler, som sikrer, at forbrugerne er ens beskyttet i hele EU;
Takes the view that a pan-European code of conduct for online gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer; considers that this code of conduct should help to ensure responsible gaming, a high level of protection for players, particularly in the case of minors and other vulnerable persons, support mechanisms both at EU and national level that fight cyber crime, fraud and misleading advertisement and ultimately provide a framework of principles and rules which ensures that consumers are protected evenly across the EU;
understreger, at medlemsstaterne bør gøre mere for at hindre ulovlige spiludbydere i at tilbyde deres tjenester online, f.eks. ved at sortliste ulovlige spiludbydere; opfordrer Kommissionen til at undersøge muligheden for at forelægge retligt bindende instrumenter, der forpligter banker, kreditkortselskaber og andre udbydere af betalingssystemer i EU til, på grundlag af nationale sorte lister, at blokere transaktioner mellem deres kunder og spiludbydere, der ikke har licens på deres retsområde, men uden at hindre lovlige transaktioner;
Stresses that more action should be taken by Member States to prevent illegal gambling providers from offering their services online, for example by blacklisting illegal gambling providers; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of proposing a legally binding instruments obliging banks, credit card issuers and other payment system participants in the EU to block, on the basis of national black lists, transactions between their clients and gambling providers that are not licensed in their jurisdiction, without hindering legitimate transactions;
respekterer medlemsstaternes ret til at anvende en bred vifte af repressive foranstaltninger mod ulovlige onlinespilletilbud; støtter, at der for at gøre bekæmpelsen af disse ulovlige udbud mere effektiv indføres et reguleringsprincip, hvorefter en spiloperatør kun kan virke (eller søge om den obligatoriske statslige licens) i en medlemsstat, hvis den pågældende ikke virker i strid med loven i nogen medlemsstat;
Respects the right of the Member States to draw on a wide variety of repressive measures against illegal online gambling offers; supports, in order to increase the efficiency of the fight against illegal online gambling offers, the introduction of a regulatory principle whereby a gambling company can only operate (or bid for the required national licence) in one Member State if it does not operate in contravention of the law in any other EU Member State;
opfordrer Kommissionen, som »traktaternes vogter«, og medlemsstaterne til fortsat at udføre effektive at kontroller af, at EU-retten overholdes;
Calls on the Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, and the Member States to continue to carry out effective checks on compliance with EU law;
konstaterer, at der kunne være gjort større fremskridt i de traktatbrudssager, der har været under behandling, siden 2008, og at ingen medlemsstater hidtil er blevet indbragt for EU-Domstolen; opfordrer indtrængende Kommissionen til at fortsætte undersøgelsen af eventuelle uoverensstemmelser mellem medlemsstaternes lovgivning om spil (offline og online) og TEUF og om nødvendigt fortsætte de traktatbrudsprocedurer, der har verseret siden 2008, for at sikre sådan overensstemmelse; minder Kommissionen om, at den som »traktaternes vogter« har pligt til at handle hurtigt, når den modtager klager over overtrædelser af frihedsrettighederne i traktaterne;;
Notes the fact that more progress could have been made on pending infringement cases since 2008 and that no Member State has ever been referred to the European Court of Justice; urges the Commission to continue its investigation of the possible inconsistencies of Member States gambling legislation (offline and online) with the TFEU and – if necessary – to pursue those infringement proceedings that have been pending since 2008 in order to ensure such consistency; reminds the Commission, as ‘guardian of the Treaties’, of its duty to act swiftly upon receipt of complaints about violations of the freedoms enshrined in the Treaties;
Samarbejde mellem de regulerende myndigheder
Cooperation among regulatory bodies
mener, at samarbejdet mellem de nationale reguleringsmyndigheder skal udvides betragteligt, idet disse tildeles tilstrækkelige beføjelser og med Kommissionen som koordinator, med henblik på at udvikle fælles standarder og gennemføre fælles aktioner mod udbydere af onlinespil, som virker uden den krævede nationale licens; fastslår, at rent nationale løsninger ikke er tilstrækkelige til at identificere sortlistede spillere og bekæmpe hvidvaskning af penge, svindel og andre, ofte organiserede kriminalitetsformer; i denne forbindelse: mener, at det vil være nødvendigt at etablere en regulerende myndighed med passende beføjelser i hver medlemsstat for at opnå et mere effektivt reguleringsmæssigt samarbejde; mener, at informationssystemet for det indre marked vil kunne tjene som grundlag for et mere effektivt samarbejde mellem de nationale reguleringsmyndigheder; noterer sig de nationale reguleringsmyndigheders initiativer med sigte på et tættere samarbejde, f.eks. GREF-netværket (Gaming Regulators European Forum) og »European Regulatory Platform«; opfordrer til tættere samarbejde og bedre koordination mellem EU's medlemsstater, Europol og Eurojust i bekæmpelsen af ulovligt spil, svig, hvidvaskning af penge og andre finansielle forbrydelser I forbindelse med onlinespil;
Calls for cooperation among national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, giving them a sufficient remit, with the Commission as coordinator, to develop common standards and take joint action against online gambling operators which operate without the required national licence; states that, in particular as a means of identifying blacklisted gamblers and combating money laundering, betting fraud and other organised crime, national standalone solutions are not successful; in this context; considers the establishment of a regulator with suitable powers in each Member State to be a necessary step towards more effective regulatory cooperation; states that the Internal Market Information System could serve as the basis for more effective cooperation among national regulatory bodies; takes note of initiatives by national regulators to work together more closely, such as the Gaming Regulators European Forum (GREF) network and the European Regulatory Platform; calls for closer cooperation and better coordination among EU Member States, Europol and Eurojust in the fight against illegal gambling, fraud, money laundering and other financial crimes in the area of online gambling;
mener, at forskellige former for onlinespil - f.eks. hurtige interaktive hasardspil, som afvikles med sekundfrekvens, væddemål og lottospil med ugentlige trækninger - er meget forskellige fra hinanden og derfor kræver forskellige løsninger, eftersom mulighederne for svindel er større inden for nogle spilformer end andre; bemærker navnlig, at mulighederne for hvidvaskning af penge afhænger af identifikationens pålidelighed, spiltypen og de anvendte betalingsformer, hvorfor det for nogle spilformer er nødvendigt at overvåge spilafviklingen i realtid og at føre en skrappere kontrol end det er tilfældet med andre spilformer;
Takes the view that the various forms of online gambling – such as rapid interactive games of chance which have to be played at a frequency of seconds, betting, and lotteries involving a weekly draw – differ from one another and require different solutions insofar as some forms of gambling afford greater opportunities for abuse than others; notes in particular that the opportunity for money laundering depends on the strength of identification, the type of game and the methods of payment used, which makes it necessary, in respect of some forms of game, to monitor play in real time and exercise stricter control than is the case with other forms of game;
understreger, at det er nødvendigt at overveje beskyttelse af de konti, som kunderne åbner for at kunne spille online, for det tilfælde, at tjenesteudbyderen bliver insolvent; foreslår derfor, at enhver fremtidig lovgivning skal tilstræbe at beskytte indsatserne i tilfælde, hvor spillewebsteder pålægges bøder, eller der indledes retsforfølgelse af dem;
Emphasises the need to address the protection of customer accounts opened in connection with online gambling in the event of the service provider becoming insolvent; suggests, therefore, that any future legislation aim to protect deposits in the event that fines are imposed on the websites in question, or legal proceedings brought against them;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at hjælpe forbrugere, der er ofre for ulovlige metoder, og tilbyde dem juridisk bistand;
Asks the Commission to support consumers if they have been affected by illegal practices and to offer them legal support;
anbefaler indførelse af fælles europæiske mindstestandarder for elektronisk identifikation; mener, at registreringen bør gennemføres på en sådan måde, at spillernes identitet fastslås, og det samtidig sikres, at spillerne råder over højst en spillekonto pr. spilleselskab; understreger, at solide registrerings- og verifikationssystemer er centrale redskaber til at forhindre svindel med onlinespil, f.eks. pengehvidvaskning;
Recommends the introduction of pan-European uniform minimum standards of electronic identification; considers that registration should be performed in such a way that the player's identity is established and at the same time it is ensured that the player has at his disposal a maximum of one gambling account per gambling company; emphasises that robust registration and verification systems are key tools in preventing any misuse of online gambling, such as money laundering;
opfordrer til, at der anvendes effektive metoder til at håndtere problematisk spilleadfærd, bl.a. ved hjælp af spilleforbud og obligatoriske grænser for udgifterne i en vis periode, om end fastsat af spilleren selv; understreger, at det, hvis en udgiftsgrænse kan hæves, skal ske med en tidsforsinkelse, før det kan træde i kraft;
Calls for effective methods to be used to tackle problem gambling, inter alia by means of gambling bans and compulsory limits on expenditure over a particular period, albeit set by the customer himself; stresses that, in addition, if an expenditure limit can be raised, a time lag should apply before this takes effect;
understreger, at afhængighed af hasardspil er en patologisk spilleadfærd, hvis udbredelse menes at nå op på 2 % af befolkningen i nogle lande; ønsker derfor, at der foretages en undersøgelse af udbredelsen af spilleafhængighed i EU's medlemsstater som grundlag for en samlet strategi til beskyttelse af forbrugerne mod denne form for afhængighed; mener, at der, så snart der er åbnet en spillerkonto, bør tilbydes udtømmende og sandfærdig information om hasardspil, ansvarlig spilleadfærd og mulighederne for behandling mod spilafhængighed;
Stresses that compulsive gambling is in fact a behavioural disorder which may affect up to 2% of the population in some countries; calls, therefore, for a survey of the extent of the problem in each EU Member State as a basis for an integrated strategy designed to protect consumers from this form of addiction; takes the view that as soon as a gambling account is created, comprehensive and accurate information must be made available with regard to gambling games, responsible gambling and opportunities for treatment of dependence on gambling;
opfordrer Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne til at være opmærksomme på allerede gennemførte undersøgelser på dette område, at fokusere på forskning i forekomst, udvikling og behandling af ludomani og indsamle og offentliggøre statistiske data om alle (online- og offline-) spillemarkederne og om ludomani med henblik på at samle omfattende data om hele spillemarkedet i EU; understreger behovet for statistikker fra uafhængige kilder navnlig vedrørende ludomani;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take note of studies already conducted in this field, to focus on research examining the incidence, formation and treatment of gambling addiction and to collect and publish statistics on all channels (online and offline) of gambling sectors and gambling addiction in order to produce comprehensive data on the entire gambling sector of the EU; underlines the need for statistics from independent sources, particularly concerning gambling addiction;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at fremme oprettelsen af et netværk af nationale organisationer, som beskæftiger sig med ludomaner, for at muliggøre en udveksling af erfaringer og bedste praksis;
Calls on the Commission to prompt the formation of a network of national organisations taking care of gambling addicts, so that experience and best practices can be exchanged;
konstaterer, at spillesektoren ifølge en for nylig offentliggjort undersøgelse Study on »Cross-Border Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union«, 2011, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies/download.do?language=en&file=41671.
Observes that, according to a recently published study Study on ‘Cross-Border Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union’, 2011, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies/download.do?language=en&file=41671.
blev udpeget som den sektor, hvor der hyppigst savnes en mekanisme til alternativ tvistbilæggelse; foreslår derfor, at de nationale reguleringsinstanser skal kunne oprette mekanismer til alternativ tvistbilæggelse i onlinespillesektoren;
, the gambling sector was identified as the sector where the lack of an alternative dispute resolution system most frequently makes itself felt; suggests, therefore, that national regulatory agencies could establish alternative dispute resolution systems for the online gambling sector;
Spil og sport: nødvendigheden af at sikre integritet
Gambling and sport: the need to ensure integrity
konstaterer, at risikoen for svindel i sportskampe - selv om den har været til stede fra begyndelsen - er øget efter at onlinespilsektoren er kommet til og derfor udgør en risiko for sportens integritet; mener derfor, at der bør udvikles en fælles definition af svindel og snyd i forbindelse med sportskampe og at svindel i forbindelse med væddemål bør gøres strafbart i hele Europa;
Notes that the risk of fraud in sports competitions – although present since the outset – has been exacerbated since the emergence of the online sports betting sector and represents a risk to the integrity of sport; is therefore of the opinion that a common definition of sport fraud and cheating should be developed and that betting fraud should be penalised as a criminal offence throughout Europe;
ønsker instrumenter, som kan øge det grænseoverskridende politi- og retssamarbejde, og som omfatter alle medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder for forebyggelse, opdagelse og efterforskning af aftalt spil i forbindelse med sportsvæddemål; opfordrer i denne forbindelse medlemsstaterne til at overveje særlige retsforfølgningstjenester med særligt ansvar for at efterforske tilfælde af aftalt spil; ønsker en ramme for samarbejdet med arrangører af sportskonkurrencer med henblik på at lette udveksling af oplysninger mellem sportens disciplinære organer og staternes efterforsknings- og påtalemyndigheder, f.eks. ved at oprette særlige nationale netværk og kontaktpunkter til at tage sig at tilfælde af aftalt spil; dette bør, hvor det er hensigtsmæssigt, ske i samarbejde med spiludbyderne;
Calls for instruments to increase cross-border police and judicial cooperation, involving all Member States' competent authorities for the prevention, detection and investigation of match-fixing in connection with sport betting; in this respect, invites Member States to consider dedicated prosecution services with primary responsibility for investigating match-fixing cases; calls for a framework for cooperation with organisers of sports competitions to be considered with a view to facilitating the exchange of information between sports disciplinary bodies and state investigation and prosecution agencies, by setting up, for example, dedicated national networks and contact points to deal with cases of match-fixing; this should happen, where appropriate, in cooperation with the gambling operators;
mener derfor, at der bør indføres en fælles definition af svindel i forbindelse med sport på europæisk niveau, som bør inkluderes i alle medlemsstaternes straffelove;
Considers, therefore, that a uniform definition of sports fraud should be set at European level and included in the criminal law of all Member States;
udtrykker sin bekymring over forbindelserne mellem kriminelle organisationer og udviklingen af aftalt spil i forbindelse med onlinevæddemål, hvor overskuddet anvendes til andre kriminelle aktiviteter;
Expresses its concerns over the links between criminal organisations and the development of match-fixing in relation to online betting, the profits from which feed other criminal activities;
konstaterer, at flere europæiske lande allerede har vedtaget streng lovgivning mod hvidvaskning af penge gennem sportsvæddemål, svig inden for sport (som klassificeres som en specifik straffelovsovertrædelse) og interessekonflikter mellem væddemålsoperatører og sportsklubber, hold eller aktive atleter;
Notes that several European countries have already adopted strict legislation against money laundering through sport betting, sport fraud (classifying it as a specific and criminal offence) and conflicts of interests between betting operators and sport clubs, teams or active athletes;