natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
glæder sig over det tætte samarbejde mellem Udvalget for Andragender, Kommissionens tjenestegrene og Ombudsmanden og over det samarbejdsklima, der eksisterer mellem de institutioner, der søger at håndtere EU-borgernes bekymringer; mener dog bestemt, at der bør fokuseres på at gøre Udvalget for Andragender i stand til selv yderligere at øge sine egne uafhængige undersøgelsesfaciliteter, navnlig ved at styrke dets sekretariat og dets juridiske ekspertise; forpligter sig til yderligere at strømline de interne procedurer i Udvalget for Andragender med henblik på at lette processen for andragender yderligere, navnlig med hensyn til den tidsramme, inden for hvilken behandlingen af andragenderne afsluttes, deres opfyldelse af betingelserne for behandling, undersøgelse og opfølgning, afholdelsen af udvalgsmøder, samarbejde med andre parlamentariske udvalg, som måtte have interesse i eller kompetence i forbindelse med visse andragender, og udvalgsinitiativer, som f.eks. undersøgelsesrejser;
Welcomes the close collaboration between the Committee on Petitions and the services of the Commission and the Ombudsman and the climate of cooperation that exists between the institutions which seek to respond to the concerns of EU citizens; firmly believes, however, that priority should be accorded to enabling the Committee on Petitions itself to further enhance its own independent investigatory facilities, notably through the reinforcement of its secretariat and its legal expertise; undertakes to further streamline internal procedures of the Committee on Petitions in order to facilitate the petitions process further, notably with respect to the time frame within which petitions are determined, their admissibility, investigation and follow-up, the organisation of committee meetings, cooperation with other parliamentary committees which may have an interest or competence with regard to certain petitions, and committee initiatives such as fact-finding missions;
understreger, at chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder vil få retsvirkning, hvis Lissabontraktaten ratificeres fuldt ud, og at dette formelt vil knæsætte dets selvstændige bindende karakter, og påpeger nødvendigheden af at overveje konkrete foranstaltninger med henblik på at fastslå, hvilken indflydelse dette vil have på borgernes rettigheder og dermed på Udvalget for Andragenders arbejde og kompetence;
Stresses that the legal scope of the Charter of Fundamental Rights will be recognised if the Lisbon Treaty is fully ratified, and that this will formally enshrine its independent binding character, and points out that specific measures will have to be envisaged to determine what effect this will have on citizens' rights and, as a consequence, on the work and competences of the Committee on Petitions;
gentager sin anmodning til generalsekretæren om hurtigst muligt at foretage en evaluering af "Borgernes Portal" på Parlamentets websted med henblik på at styrke portalens synlighed hvad angår retten til at indgive andragender og sikre, at borgerne kan sætte deres elektroniske underskrift for at tilslutte sig andragender som fastsat i forretningsordenens artikel 192, stk. 2; henstiller kraftigt til, at "Borgernes Portal" sikrer kompatibilitet med alle former for software til internetbrowsing for at give borgerne lige rettigheder i denne henseende;
Reiterates its requests to its Secretary-General to conduct an urgent review of the "Citizens Portal" on Parliament's website with the objective of enhancing the visibility of the portal as regards the right of petition and to ensure that citizens are provided with the means to append their signatures electronically in support of petitions, as provided for in Rule 192(2) of the Rules of Procedure; urges that the Citizen's Portal must ensure web-browsing software interoperability in order to provide citizens with equal rights of access in this respect;
mener, at den nuværende procedure for registrering af andragender uretmæssigt forsinker deres undersøgelse, og er bekymret for, at dette kan opfattes som tegn på en vis mangel på sensibilitet over for andragere; henstiller derfor kraftigt til generalsekretæren om at træffe de nødvendige foranstaltninger til at overføre registreringen af andragender fra Generaldirektoratet for Ledelsestjenesterne til det korresponderende udvalgs sekretariat;
Considers that the present procedure for registration of petitions unduly delays their examination, and is concerned that this may be perceived as displaying a certain lack of sensitivity towards petitioners; urges its Secretary-General, therefore, to take the necessary measures to transfer the registration of petitions from the Directorate-General of the Presidency to the secretariat of the committee responsible;
opfordrer til, at der indledes forhandlinger mellem Parlamentet og Kommissionen med henblik på at sikre en bedre koordinering af deres arbejde med klager på en måde, der letter, forenkler og strømliner klageprocedurerne og gør dem mere gennemsigtige og effektive; opfordrer generalsekretæren til at melde tilbage til Udvalget for Andragender inden for seks måneder;
Calls for the initiation of negotiations between Parliament and the Commission with a view to better coordinating their work on complaints in a way that facilitates, simplifies and streamlines the complaint procedures and makes them more transparent and expeditious; calls on the Secretary-General to report back to the Committee on Petitions within six months;
støtter formaliseringen af en procedure, hvorefter andragender vedrørende det indre marked kan overføres til SOLVIT-nettet, med henblik på i betydelig grad at forkorte processen for andragender vedrørende spørgsmål om det indre marked, såsom afgifter på biler, anerkendelse af faglige kvalifikationer, opholdstilladelser, grænsekontrol og adgang til uddannelse, idet Parlamentets ret til at undersøge spørgsmålet, hvis SOLVIT ikke finder en tilfredsstillende løsning, bevares;
Supports the formalisation of a procedure whereby petitions in the field of the internal market are transferred to the SOLVIT network with a view to significantly shortening the petitions process in the field of internal market issues such as car taxes, recognition of professional qualifications, residence permits, border controls and access to education, while preserving Parliament's right to examine the issue should a satisfactory solution not be found through SOLVIT;
understreger behovet for, at Rådet og medlemsstaternes faste repræsentationer i højere grad involverer sig i Udvalget for Andragenders arbejde, og opfordrer dem til at øge deres tilstedeværelse og deltagelse i borgernes interesser;
Reiterates the need for greater involvement on the part of the Council and the Member States' Permanent Representations in the activities of the Committee on Petitions, and urges them to increase their presence and participation in the interests of the citizens;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at tage fuldt hensyn til Udvalget for Andragenders henstillinger, når den træffer afgørelse vedrørende indledningen af overtrædelsesprocedurer mod medlemsstater, og gentager sit krav om, at Kommissionen underretter Udvalget for Andragender direkte og officielt, når der indledes en overtrædelsesprocedure, der har forbindelse til et andragende, der er under behandling i udvalget;
Calls on the Commission to take full account of the recommendations of the Committee on Petitions when reaching decisions regarding the initiation of infringement proceedings against Member States, and reiterates its demand that the Committee on Petitions be directly and officially notified by the Commission when an infringement procedure is launched which is related to a petition under consideration by the Committee;
gentager i denne forbindelse Udvalget for Andragenders repræsentative art og den institutionelle rolle og pligt, som det har over for EU's borgere og indbyggere;
Reiterates in this connection the representative nature of the Committee on Petitions as well as the institutional role and duty that it performs vis-à-vis EU citizens and residents;
udtrykker bekymring over den overdrevent lange tid, det tager for Kommissionen og Domstolen, hvis og når Domstolen er indblandet, at afslutte overtrædelsessager, og opfordrer - idet det anerkender, at dette ofte skyldes langsomme og ofte bevidste hindringer i de pågældende medlemsstaters administrationer - til at indføre strammere tidsfrister; udtrykker sin tvivl om effektiviteten af de såkaldte "horisontale overtrædelsesprocedurer", som tager længere til at afslutte; opfordrer til en evaluering af overtrædelsesproceduren med henblik på at sikre en større respekt for gennemførelsen af Fællesskabets retsakter;
Expresses concern about the excessive length of time taken to conclude infringement cases by the Commission services and the Court of Justice, if and when the Court is involved, and – recognising that this is frequently the result of slow and often deliberate obstruction within the Member State administrations involved – calls for the introduction of more stringent timescales; expresses its doubts about the efficiency of the so-called 'horizontal infringement procedures', which take longer to conclude; calls for a review of the infringement procedure aimed at ensuring greater respect for the application of EC legislative acts;
opfordrer de pågældende institutioner til at gøre bedre brug af denne procedure som et middel til at sikre fuld respekt for fællesskabslovgivningen og beklager dybt, at langsommeligheden af de anvendte procedurer og den hyppige uklarhed om, hvad der står på spil, fører til, at medlemsstaterne begår de facto-brud på fællesskabslovgivningen og derved ustraffet handler imod interesserne for direkte berørte lokale samfund, som har indgivet andragende til Parlamentet;
Calls on the institutions concerned to make better use of this procedure as a means of ensuring full respect for Community law, and deeply regrets that too often the slowness of the procedures used and the frequent obfuscation of what is at stake lead to de facto breaches of Community law by Member States, who thus act with impunity against the interests of directly affected local communities who have petitioned Parliament;
anser det for problematisk, at det nuværende system for kontrol med fællesskabslovgivningen giver medlemsstaterne mulighed for at udskyde overholdelsen, indtil en økonomisk sanktion er overhængende, og stadig undgå ansvaret for tidligere forsætlige krænkelser, og at borgerne tilsyneladende ofte savner passende adgang til retssystemet og instrumenter på nationalt niveau, selv når Domstolen har afgjort, at en medlemsstat ikke har overholdt borgernes rettigheder i henhold til fællesskabslovgivningen;
Considers it problematic that the present system for the monitoring of Community law allows Member States to delay compliance until a pecuniary sanction is actually imminent and still avoid responsibility for past intentional violations, and that citizens often appear to lack adequate access to justice and remedies at national level even when the Court of Justice has ruled that a Member State has failed to respect citizens' rights under Community law;
anbefaler, at det prioriteres at sikre, at Udvalg for Andragender er effektivt og virkningsfuldt i alle aspekter af dets virksomhed fra start til slut, da dette udgør en reel og konkret forpligtelse over for EU's borgere og viser, at EU er villig og i stand til at tage hånd om deres legitime bekymringer;
Recommends that priority be given to ensuring that the Committee on Petitions is effective and efficient in all aspects of its operations from start to finish, as this represents a real and tangible commitment to its citizens indicating that the EU is willing and able to respond to their legitimate concerns;
udtrykker sin bekymring og rystelse over beretninger fra andragere om, at de, selv når de har opnået støtte fra Udvalget for Andragender hvad angår indholdet af deres andragende, alt for ofte oplever stort besvær med at opnå kompensation fra de involverede myndigheder og nationale domstole; mener, at en sådan systematisk svaghed må undersøges yderligere, navnlig for så vidt de angår sektoren for finansielle tjenesteydelser, som i tilfældet med Undersøgelsesudvalgets resultater i forbindelse med krisen i Equitable Life, der var baseret på andragender modtaget af Parlamentet, og som der blev udarbejdet en beretning om i 2007;
Expresses its concern and dismay at reports by petitioners that, even when they have obtained the support of the Committee on Petitions on the substance of their petition, they too often experience great difficulty in obtaining any compensation from the authorities and national courts involved; believes that such systemic weaknesses need to be further investigated, notably in so far as they apply to the financial services sector, as in the case of the findings of the Committee of Inquiry into the Equitable Life Crisis, which were based on petitions received by Parliament and on which a report was produced in 2007;
glæder sig over, at Kommissionen og Domstolen i 2007 handlede hurtigt, herunder ved hjælp af et forbud, for at forhindre den truende ødelæggelse af et område i Rospuda-dalen, der er beskyttet under habitatdirektivet, på grund af Via Baltica-vejkorridoren, med hensyn til hvilken Udvalget for Andragender havde gennemført sin egen uafhængige undersøgelse og undersøgelsesrejse og givet specifikke anbefalinger; beklager, at der ikke var flere af den slags eksempler;
Welcomes the fact that in 2007 the Commission and the Court of Justice acted swiftly, including by means of an injunction, to prevent the imminent destruction of an area protected under the Habitats Directive in the Rospuda Valley by the Via Baltica road corridor, in respect of which the Committee on Petitions had conducted its own independent investigation and fact-finding visit and made specific recommendations; laments the fact that there were not more examples of this kind;
opfordrer indtrængende Kommissionen til, når den behandler andragender og klager vedrørende miljøpolitik - som er en af de mest udbredte bekymringer hos andragerne i EU - til i højere grad at være parat til at handle for at undgå brud på fællesskabslovgivningen; bemærker, at "forsigtighedsprincippet" ikke har tilstrækkelig praktisk retsvirkning og alt for ofte ignoreres af ansvarlige myndigheder i medlemsstater, som ikke desto mindre er forpligtet til at gennemføre EF-traktaten;
Urges the Commission, when dealing with petitions and complaints related to environmental policy – which is one of the predominant concerns of petitioners in the EU – to be more ready to act to prevent breaches of Community law; notes that the "precautionary principle" has insufficient practical legal force and is too often ignored by responsible authorities in Member States who are nevertheless under an obligation to apply the EC Treaty;
beklager Kommissionens manglende støtte til Udvalget for Andragender, når der som et resultat af især undersøgelsesrejser opnås overbevisende dokumentation om manglende respekt for borgernes rettigheder som fastlagt i EF-traktaten eller manglende gennemførelse af lovgivningen, og opfordrer til, at der indføres nye procedurer, der giver Parlamentet mulighed for at bringe sådanne sager direkte for Domstolen;
Regrets the lack of support given to the Committee on Petitions by the Commission when, as a result of fact-finding visits in particular, compelling evidence is obtained concerning failure to respect citizen's rights as enshrined in the Treaty or failure to apply legislation, and calls for new procedures to be established which allow Parliament to bring such cases directly before the Court of Justice;
anerkender fuldt ud, at proceduren for andragender som anerkendt i traktaten imidlertid primært beskæftiger sig med opnåelsen af udenretlige midler og løsninger med hensyn til de problemer, som EU's borgere fremkommer med gennem den politiske proces, og glæder sig i denne forbindelse over, at der i mange tilfælde er opnået tilfredsstillende resultater;
Fully recognises that the petitions process, as recognised in the Treaty, is nevertheless primarily concerned with obtaining non-judicial remedies and solutions with regard to the problems raised by EU citizens through the political process and, in this context, welcomes the fact that in many instances satisfactory outcomes are achieved;
erkender også, at der i mange tilfælde ikke kan findes tilfredsstillende løsninger for andragere på grund af svagheden i selve den gældende fællesskabslovgivning;
Recognises also that in many instances satisfactory solutions cannot be found for petitioners because of the weaknesses in the applicable Community legislation itself;
opfordrer det korresponderende lovgivende udvalg til, når det forbereder sig på og forhandler om nye eller reviderede retsakter, at tage nøje hensyn til de problemer, som indberettes gennem proceduren for andragender;
Calls on the responsible legislative committees, when preparing and negotiating new or revised legislative acts, to pay close attention to the problems reported through the petitions process;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at beskæftige sig mere med anvendelsen af samhørighedsfonde i områder af EU, hvor infrastrukturprojekter har stor indvirkning på miljøet, og opfordrer medlemsstaterne til at sikre, at EU's midler rettes mod bæredygtig udvikling til gavn for lokalsamfund, hvoraf stadig flere indgiver andragender til Parlamentet for at protestere over, at sådanne prioriteter ikke altid respekteres af regionale og lokale myndigheder; glæder sig over det arbejde, som Budgetkontroludvalget og Revisionsretten udfører i denne forbindelse;
Calls on the Commission to be more concerned about the use of Cohesion Funds in areas of the EU where large infrastructure projects have a major impact on the environment, and urges Member States to ensure that EU funds are directed towards sustainable development in the interests of local communities, a growing number of which are petitioning Parliament to protest that such priorities are not always respected by regional and local authorities; welcomes the work being undertaken by the Committee on Budgetary Control and the Court of Auditors in this respect;
bemærker, at et stigende antal af modtagne andragender, navnlig fra borgere fra de nye medlemsstater, omhandler spørgsmål om tilbagelevering af ejendom, selv om disse emner fortsat i væsentlig grad henhører under national kompetence; opfordrer indtrængende de berørte medlemsstater til at sikre, at deres love vedrørende ejendomsrettigheder, der er blevet til som følge af et ændret styre, er fuldt ud i overensstemmelse med EF-traktatens krav og med den europæiske menneskerettighedskonventions bestemmelser, som det også kræves ifølge EU-traktatens artikel 6 som ændret ved Lissabontraktaten; understreger, at modtagne andragender om dette emne ikke vedrører de ejendomsretlige ordninger, men retten til lovligt erhvervet ejendom; opfordrer i denne forbindelse indtrængende Kommissionen til at være særlig årvågen, ikke blot i dens samarbejde med nuværende medlemsstater, men også i dens forhandlinger med kandidatlande;
Notes that a growing number of petitions received, notably from citizens from the new Member States, concern the question of the restitution of property, even though this subject remains essentially one of national competence; urges the Member States involved to ensure that their laws concerning property rights resulting from regime change are fully in accordance with Treaty requirements and the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights, as required also by Article 6 of the EU Treaty as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon; emphasises that petitions received on this subject do not concern the system of property ownership but the right to legitimately acquired property; in this context, urges the Commission to be particularly vigilant not only in its dealings with existing Member States but also in its negotiations with candidate countries;
bekræfter sin forpligtelse til at opretholde anerkendelsen af EU-borgernes rettigheder til deres lovligt erhvervede private ejendom og fordømmer alle forsøg på at fratage familier deres ejendom uden retfærdig rettergang, rimelig godtgørelse eller respekt for deres personlige integritet; bemærker en stigning i antallet af modtagne andragender om dette spørgsmål, navnlig vedrørende Spanien i 2007, og bemærker også beretningen og henstillingerne fra den undersøgelsesrejse, som Udvalget for Andragender foretog med henblik på at undersøge problemet for tredje gang; bemærker, at igangværende procedurer vedrørende direktiverne om offentlige udbud stadig er åbne;
Reaffirms its commitment to upholding the recognition of rights of EU citizens to their private property which has been legally obtained, and condemns all attempts to divest families of their property without due process, proper compensation or respect for their personal integrity; notes an increase in the numbers of petitions received on this issue, especially regarding Spain in 2007, and notes also the report and recommendations of the fact-finding visit conducted by the Committee on Petitions to investigate the problem for the third time; notes that, as regards the Public Procurement Directives, ongoing infringement procedures are still open;
bemærker også den kritik, som Udvalget for Andragender rejste efter sin undersøgelsesrejse til Loiret i Frankrig i 2007, og anmoder især indtrængende de franske myndigheder til at handle beslutsomt for at sikre overholdelse af EU-direktiver, som risikerer at blive brudt, hvis visse planlagte projekter om etablering af broer over Loirefloden får lov til at blive gennemført, idet Loirefloddalen ikke kun er beskyttet under habitatdirektivets og fugledirektivets bestemmelser, men også er verdenskulturarv under UNESCO og en af Europas sidste tilbageværende systemer af vilde floder;
Notes also the criticisms raised by the Committee on Petitions following its fact-finding visit to the Loiret, in France, in 2007, and in particular requests the French authorities to act decisively to ensure compliance with EU directives which risk being infringed should certain planned projects for the construction of bridges over the River Loire be allowed to go ahead, bearing in mind that the Loire Valley is not only protected under the terms of the Habitats Directive and the Birds Directive but is also a UNESCO World Heritage Site and one of Europe's last remaining wild river systems;
udtrykker sin fortsatte bekymring over den manglende gennemførelse af drikkevandsdirektivets bestemmelser i Irland, den manglende vurdering forud for en beslutning fra 2007 om at fjerne et nationalt monument i Lismullen på ruten for M3-motorvejsprojektet i nærheden af Tara i County Meath, som medførte, at Kommissionen anlagde sag mod Irland ved Domstolen med den begrundelse, at Irlands bredere tilgang til fjernelse af nationale monumenter under forhold som i f.eks. Lismullen, ikke overholder kravene i direktiv 85/337/EØF Rådets direktiv 85/337/EØF af 27. juni 1985 om vurdering af visse offentlige og private projekters indvirkning på miljøet (EFT L 175 af 5.7.1985, s. 40).
Expresses its ongoing concern about the lack of implementation of the provisions of the Drinking Water Directive in Ireland, the absence of any assessment in advance of a 2007 decision to remove a national monument situated at Lismullin in the path of the M3 motorway project near Tara in County Meath – leading to the Commission's decision to bring an action against Ireland before the Court of Justice on the grounds that Ireland's wider approach to the removal of national monuments in circumstances such as those at Lismullin does not fully respect the requirements of Directive 85/337/EEC Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.