natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
der henviser til, at medlemsstaterne er ansvarlige for organisation, forvaltning, levering og finansiering af sundhedssystemerne, der er forskellige fra medlemsstat til medlemsstat,
whereas the Member States are responsible for organising, managing, delivering and financing health care systems, which are different in every Member State,
der henviser til, at Domstolen har afsagt en række domme, bl.a. om adgang til medicinsk behandling, om fastsættelse af kriterier for forhåndsgodkendelsesprocedurer eller for refusion af udgifter samt om EU-borgernes frie bevægelighed med hensyn til medicinsk behandling i en anden medlemsstat,
whereas the Court of Justice has handed down a number of judgments, on issues such as access to health care and the settlement of criteria for prior authorisation procedures or for reimbursement of costs, which authorise EU citizens to move freely in order to find health care in another Member State,
der henviser til, at Rådet i sine ovennævnte konklusioner om fælles værdier og principper i Den Europæiske Unions sundhedssystemer vedtog en erklæring fra Den Europæiske Unions 25 sundhedsministre om de fælles værdier og principper, der ligger til grund for Europas sundhedssystemer,
whereas, in its above mentioned Conclusions on Common values and principles in European Union Health Systems, the Council adopted a statement by the 25 health Ministers of the European Union about the common values and principles that underpin Europe's health systems,
mener, at patientmobiliteten og mobiliteten for fagfolk i sundhedssektoren på tværs af grænserne vil stige i de kommende år, således at patienterne får flere valgmuligheder; mener, at alle europæiske borgere, uanset indtægtsniveau og bopæl, skal sikres lige adgang til økonomisk overkommelig og rettidig sundhedspleje under overholdelse af principperne om almengyldighed, kvalitet, sikkerhed, kontinuitet og solidaritet, hvilket bidrager til den sociale og territoriale samhørighed i EU og samtidig sikrer de nationale sundhedssystemers økonomiske bæreevne; mener, at patienters og fagfolks mobilitet i overensstemmelse med disse principper kan bidrage til at forbedre adgangen til og kvaliteten af sundhedspleje;
Considers that cross-border mobility of patients and health professionals will increase in future, thus giving patients more choice; considers that, whatever their level of income or place of residence, all European citizens should be guaranteed equal and affordable access to health care in due time, in accordance with the principles of universality, quality, safety, continuity and solidarity, thus contributing to the social and territorial cohesion of the Union while ensuring the financial sustainability of national health care systems; considers that, in accordance with those principles, the mobility of patients and professionals may contribute to improving accessibility to and quality of health care;
bemærker, at sundhedspleje ikke fremmes tilstrækkeligt af medlemsstaterne, og at patienters rettigheder dermed indskrænkes;
Notes that the Member States do not sufficiently promote health care, as a result of which patients" rights are restricted;
minder om, at medlemsstater, der har gennemført Domstolens eksisterende praksis, ikke har mærket nogen større stigning i sundhedsplejebudgetterne som følge af patientmobilitet;
Recalls that the Member States that have implemented the existing case law of the Court of Justice have not experienced any major increase in health care budgets as a result of patients" increased mobility;
tager hensyn til, at medlemsstaterne kun kan indføre et system med forhåndsgodkendelse, når det er blevet bevist, at grænseoverskridende patientmobilitet har en negativ indvirkning på det nationale sundhedsbudgets finansielle balance; opfordrer indtrængende medlemsstaterne til at overveje muligheden for at gennemføre en testperiode, hvor der ikke bruges nogen forhåndsgodkendelse;
Takes into account that Member States may only introduce a system of prior authorisation once it has been proven that cross-border movement of patients has a negative effect on the financial balance of the national health budget; urges Member States to take note of the possibility of making use of a test period during which no prior authorisation is required;
understreger, at patienters og fagfolks mobilitet ikke må anvendes af medlemsstaterne som undskyldning for ikke at investere i deres egne sundhedssystemer;
Stresses that patient mobility and professional mobility should not be an excuse for a Member State's failure to invest in its own health care system;
understreger, at der kræves adgang til grænseoverskridende pleje for at opnå borgernes fri bevægelighed i Fællesskabet, og at det er med til at styrke beskæftigelses- og konkurrenceevneniveauerne i medlemsstaterne;
Stresses that access to cross-border care is required in order to ensure the free movement of citizens within the Community and that it helps to raise employment and competitiveness levels in Member States;
understreger behovet for at skære ned på bureaukrati i forbindelse med både brugen og forsyningen af grænseoverskridende sundhedstjenester;
Stresses the need for cutting red tape connected with both the use and provision of cross-border health services;
bemærker, at det for at skære ned på bureaukratiet i forbindelse med grænseoverskridende sundhedstjenester er nødvendigt at forbedre de elektroniske systemer, der anvendes til at identificere patienter og behandle patienternes anmodninger om refusion;
Notes that, in order to cut the red tape relating to the use of cross-border health services, it is necessary to improve the electronic systems of patient identification and patient claims for reimbursement;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at fremme og medlemsstaterne til aktivt at støtte indførelsen af e-sundhed og telemedicin;
Invites the Commission to encourage the Member States to actively support the introduction of e-health and telemedicine;
understreger, at medlemsstaterne i overensstemmelse med traktatens bestemmelser har hovedansvaret for at yde borgerne effektiv sundhedspleje af høj kvalitet; fremhæver, at de med dette mål for øje bør være i stand til at anvende passende reguleringsinstrumenter på EU-plan samt på multilateralt og bilateralt plan for at forvalte deres nationale sundhedssystemer og sundhedsmyndigheder, og at de ved udøvelsen af disse beføjelser altid bør respektere traktaternes bestemmelser og subsidiaritetsprincippet;
Points out that, in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty, the Member States retain primary responsibility for providing efficient and high quality health care to their citizens; stresses that, to this end, they should be able to use the appropriate regulatory tools, at EU level as well as at multilateral and bilateral levels, to manage their national health care systems and health authorities and, in exercising that power, that they must always respect the provisions of the Treaties and the principle of subsidiarity;
understreger, at traktatbestemmelserne, herunder de særlige bestemmelser om tjenesteydelser af almen økonomisk interesse og Domstolens praksis, finder anvendelse på sundhedstjenester, og understreger, at udbydere af sundhedstjenester frit har ret til at etablere sig og levere tjenester i en hvilken som helst medlemsstat efter de nationale regler og EU-reglerne; understreger ligeledes, at patienter frit har ret til at søge adgang til sundhedspleje i en hvilken som helst medlemsstat;
Emphasises that Treaty rules, including the specific provisions on services of general economic interest, as well as the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice, apply to health services and stresses that health service providers are fully entitled to establish themselves and to provide services in any Member State, following national and EU rules; equally emphasises that patients are fully entitled to seek health care in any Member State;
bemærker, at sundhedssystemerne ikke ligger inden for Fællesskabets kompetence, og at spørgsmål vedrørende sundhedssystemer såsom adgang til lægemidler og behandling, patientoplysning og bevægelighed for forsikringsselskaber og fagfolk inden for sundhedssektoren er af grænseoverskridende karakter; bemærker, at EU må tage fat på disse spørgsmål;
Notes that, whilst health care systems are not a competence of the Community, issues relating to health care systems, such as access to medicines and treatments, patient information, and the movement of insurance companies and health professionals, have a cross-border character; notes that those issues need to be addressed by the Union;
skal anvendes bedre, således at lægemidler kommer hurtigere ud på markedet, lægemidlers innovation og sikkerhed fremmes og brugen af en centraliseret procedure for markedsføringstilladelser fremmes stærkere;
should be better applied, so that medicines are placed on the market more quickly, innovation in and safety of medicines is promoted and use of a centralised procedure for marketing authorisations is more strongly promoted;
understreger, at medlemsstater skal behandle indbyggere fra andre medlemsstater lige i forbindelse med sundhedstjenester, uanset om de er private eller offentlige patienter;
Stresses that Member States should treat residents of another Member State on an equal basis with regard to access to health services, regardless of whether they are private or public patients;
påpeger, at patienter skal have adgang til information om, hvilke sundhedsplejeudbydere der har fået international godkendelse, og at de godkendte udbydere af sundhedsplejen, uanset hvor de befinder sig i EU, skal sikre, at sundhedsplejen er sikker og baseret på målelige internationale kvalitetsindikatorer;
Points out that patients should have access to information for which the health care provider has obtained international accreditation and that the accredited providers of health care should, regardless of where they are situated in the EU, ensure that health care is safe, based on measurable international indicators of quality;
mener ikke, at patienters sikkerhed og rettigheder for øjeblikket er sikret i forbindelse med grænseoverskridende sundhedstjenester, og er af den opfattelse, at den juridiske situation for privatpatienter er usikker med hensyn til refusionsordninger, de nationale myndigheders forpligtelse til at udveksle oplysninger om regulering, diligenspligt både for indledende og opfølgende behandling og bestemmelser om risikostyring;
Is of the opinion that patients" safety and rights are not ensured in the cross-border provision of health care at present and that legal uncertainty exists regarding reimbursement mechanisms, obligations for national authorities to share regulatory information, the duty of care for both the initial and the follow-up treatment and risk management provisions for private patients;
anmoder om en klar definition af sundhedstjenester, således at anvendelsesområdet for fremtidig lovgivning præciseres og afgrænses klart; anmoder desuden om at få klargjort hvilke elementer af et sundhedssystem, der er relevante i denne forbindelse;
Requests a clear definition of health services, so as to clarify and clearly demarcate the scope of application of future legislation in this field; requests a clarification of the elements of a health care system which are relevant in this context;
bemærker, at sundhedstjenester forfølger mål, der svarer til målene for andre sociale tjenesteydelser af almen interesse, i den forstand, at de hviler på solidaritetsprincippet, ofte er forankrede i nationale socialsikringssystemer, er personrelaterede, sikrer, at borgerne kan nyde deres grundlæggende rettigheder og en høj grad af social sikring, og styrker den samfundsmæssige og territoriale samhørighed;
Notes that health care services pursue objectives comparable to other social services of general interest in the sense that they are based on the principle of solidarity, are often embedded in national social protection systems, are person-centred, ensure that citizens can benefit from their fundamental rights, ensure a high level of social protection, and strengthen social and territorial cohesion;
er af den opfattelse, at fællesskabsforanstaltninger vedrørende sundhedstjenester bør harmonere med fællesskabsforanstaltninger vedrørende sociale tjenesteydelser af almen interesse;
Is of the opinion that any Community action relating to health care services should be consistent with Community action relating to social services of general interest;
opfordrer til, at enhver yderligere præcisering af begreber, der er brugt i Domstolens praksis, ikke ændrer den balance, der er skabt af Domstolen mellem medlemsstaternes prærogativer på området folkesundhed og den enkelte patients rettigheder; minder i denne henseende, for så vidt angår begrebet "rimelig ventetid", om, at Domstolen klart har påpeget, at dette alene skal defineres i lyset af en vurdering af hver enkelt patients sundhedsmæssige situation, og at økonomiske overvejelser ikke må spille nogen rolle i den vurdering;
Requests that any further clarification of concepts used in the case law of the Court of Justice not alter the balance struck by the Court of Justice between Member States" prerogatives in the field of public health and the rights of the individual patient; in this respect recalls that, as regards the concept of "reasonable waiting time", the Court of Justice has clearly indicated that it should be defined exclusively in the light of an assessment of each patient's medical situation and that economic considerations should not play any role in that assessment;
ønsker, at begrebet "rimelig tidsfrist" og definitionen af hospitalsydelser og andre ydelser klarlægges;
Requests further clarification of concepts such as "reasonable waiting times" and definitions of in-patient and out-patient treatment;
påpeger, at proceduren for udstedelse af tilladelse til hospitalstjenester i en anden medlemsstat skal garantere patienter, at de er beskyttet mod vilkårlige beslutninger, der træffes af deres nationale myndigheder; påpeger, at hospitalsbehandling, for at lette patienternes fri bevægelighed uden at skade medlemsstaternes planlagte mål, og i lyset af Domstolens praksis, skal defineres snævert som behandling, der kun kan finde sted inden for hospitalsinfrastrukturen, og som f.eks. ikke kan finde sted i en læges konsultation eller i en patients hjem; påpeger navnlig, at enhver afvisning af at give tilladelse skal kunne anfægtes ved en domstol og en domstolslignende instans, og at der skal søges upartisk råd fra uafhængige eksperter, når hver patients helbredssituation skal vurderes;
Points out that, as regards hospital services in another Member State, the procedure for granting authorisation must provide a guarantee for patients protecting them from arbitrary decisions taken by their national authorities; points out that, in order to facilitate the free movement of patients without prejudicing Member States" planning objectives, in the light of the case law of the Court of Justice, hospital treatment should be defined narrowly as treatment which can only be provided within hospital infrastructure and may not be provided, for example, in a practitioner's surgery or at the patient's home; points out, in particular, that any refusal to grant an authorisation must be open to challenge in judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings and that, for the purpose of assessing the medical situation of each patient, entirely objective and impartial advice from independent experts should be sought;
bemærker de mange former for mobilitet og de forskellige begrundelser for mobilitet blandt patienter, der sendes til udlandet af deres nationale sundhedsvæsen, samt patienter, der søger lægebehandling i udlandet af egen fri vilje, turister, der bliver syge, vandrende arbejdstagere, studerende, pensionister og alle, der bor i en anden medlemsstat end deres oprindelsesland, eller som bor i grænseområder, og understreger, at der må tages hensyn til disse forskelle ved udformningen af den relevante politik;
Notes the great diversity in mobility and the different reasons for mobility among patients sent abroad by their national health system and among patients looking for medical treatment abroad of their own volition – tourists who fall ill, migrant workers, students, retired people and anyone living in a Member State other than their country of origin, or living in border regions – and stresses that those differences should be taken into account when formulating policy;
understreger, at der må skelnes mellem på den ene side grænseoverskridende sundhedstjenester, dvs. dem, der ligger på begge sider af en fælles grænse mellem to medlemsstater, og hvormed formålet er at opretholde og tilbyde patienter adgang og pleje af høj kvalitet, og på den anden internationale sundhedstjenester i EU, der skal tilbyde sundhedspleje til behandling af sjældne eller usædvanlige sygdomme, og/eller sygdomme, som kræver sjældne eller meget kostbare teknologier (plejereferencecentre), eller give adgang til pleje, som patienternes medlemsstat eller bopælsstat ikke for øjeblikket kan tilbyde dem;
Stresses that it is desirable to distinguish between, on the one hand, cross-border health services, meaning those which are situated on either side of a border common to two Member States, in order to maintain and offer patients a high standard of access and care, and, on the other hand, international health services within the European Union, which offer health care for the treatment of rare or orphan diseases or diseases which require rare and very expensive technologies (care reference centres) or provide access to care which the Member State or state of residence cannot at present offer patients;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at forelægge årlige statistikker for hver medlemsstat om patientmobilitet og om antallet af refusionssager, der afvises, samt grundene til afvisning;
Calls on the Commission to provide annual statistics for each Member State on patient mobility and on the number of cases of reimbursements being refused, and the reasons therefor;
erkender, at sundhedspolitik primært henhører under medlemsstaternes kompetence, og understreger behovet for sundhedspleje af høj kvalitet i patientens oprindelsesland, men glæder sig ikke desto mindre over Kommissionens initiativ til at iværksætte en høring om den bedste form for fællesskabsaktion med henblik på at lette patienters adgang til en sikker og effektiv ramme af høj kvalitet for grænseoverskridende aspekter af sundhedspleje inden for en rimelig tidsfrist og opfordrer Kommissionen til at udarbejde konkrete forslag til fremme og overvågning af udviklingen på området;
Whilst recognising that health care policy is primarily a competence of the Member States and emphasising the need for high-quality health care provision in the country of origin of the patient, nevertheless welcomes the Commission's initiative to launch a consultation on the best form of Community action with a view to improving the access of patients, within a reasonable timeframe, to a safe, high-quality and efficient framework for cross-border aspects of health care, and calls on the Commission to come up with concrete proposals to encourage and monitor progress in this area;
noterer sig, at et betydeligt antal patienter fra flere medlemsstater ikke er i stand til at modtage den nødvendige lægebehandling i deres eget land inden for en rimelig tidsfrist på grund af ventelisternes længde, og bemærker, at disse patienter derfor er afhængige af lægebehandling i udlandet;
Notes that considerable numbers of patients from several Member States are not able to receive the necessary medical treatment in their own country within a reasonable timeframe because of the length of waiting lists and notes that these patients are, therefore, dependent on medical treatment abroad;
konstaterer, at patienterne har vanskeligt ved at få adgang til klare og nøjagtige oplysninger om sundhedsydelser, navnlig i forbindelse med grænseoverskridende sundhedsydelser, og at procedurerne herfor er komplicerede; bemærker, at dette problem, der ikke kun skyldes sprogbarrierer, potentielt øger risikoen for patientens sikkerhed;
Notes how difficult it is for patients to obtain clear and precise information on health care, especially on cross-border health care, and the complexity of the procedures that have to be followed; notes that this difficulty, which is not created only by language barriers, potentially increases risks to patient safety;
mener, at EU har en vigtig rolle at spille, når det drejer sig om at forbedre patienters adgang til information om adgang til grænseoverskridende sundhedspleje;
Considers that the EU has an important role to play when it comes to improving patients" access to information on access to cross-border health care;
noterer sig, at effektiv og transparent deling og udveksling af information om sundhed er et afgørende krav for at sikre overensstemmelse og opretholde en høj kvalitet i sundhedsplejen, når der bruges sundhedstjenester i forskellige medlemsstater;
Notes that effective and transparent sharing and exchange of information on health is a vital requirement in ensuring consistency and maintaining a high quality of health care between health care services across different Member States;
ønsker at få vedtaget et europæisk charter for patientrettigheder med udgangspunkt i medlemsstaternes forskellige eksisterende chartre og de ikke-statslige organisationers arbejde;
Calls for the adoption of a European charter of patients' rights on the basis of existing charters in the Member States and of work carried out by non-governmental organisations;
anerkender de eksisterende forskelle mellem sundhedstjenestesystemerne i medlemsstaterne og de indviklede regelsæt, som regulerer refusion; opfordrer til kodificering af eksisterende retspraksis om refusion af grænseoverskridende sundhedsbehandling for at sikre en rigtig anvendelse af retspraksis i alle medlemsstater og for at forbedre den information, der er tilgængelig for patienter, nationale sygesikringsordninger og udbyderne af sundhedsydelser, uden at skabe yderligere tunge bureaukratiske byrder for medlemsstaterne;
Acknowledges the existing differences between health care systems in Member States and the complex legal frameworks which regulate reimbursements; calls for a codification of existing case law on the reimbursement of cross-border health care in order to ensure the proper application of that case law by all Member States and to improve the information available to patients, national insurance schemes and health care providers without creating additional cumbersome bureaucratic burdens for Member States;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at anspore alle medlemsstater til at anvende de eksisterende procedurer med hensyn til refusion af grænseoverskridende sundhedspleje; mener, at det bør være muligt for Kommissionen at sagsøge medlemsstater, der undlader at gøre dette;
Calls on the Commission to encourage all Member States to apply the existing procedures for reimbursement of cross-border health care; considers that it should be possible for the Commission to start proceedings against Member States that fail to do so;
opfordrer til udarbejdelse af en europæisk referenceordning vedrørende refusion for at gøre det muligt for borgerne at foretage en sammenligning og træffe det mest passende behandlingsvalg for sig selv;
Calls for a European reference scheme to be put in place concerning reimbursement in order to allow citizens to make comparisons and to make a choice as to which treatment is most suitable for them;