natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Cascade‑ekspertnetværket Chemicals as contaminants in the food chain: a Network of Excellence for research, risk assessment and education - http://www.cascadenet.org/projectweb/portalproject/Index.html. analyserede BPA på grund af de østrogene egenskaber og risikoen for forurening af fødevarer og vand og udarbejdede en risikovurderingsmodel og nye analysemetoder.
The CASCADE network of excellence Chemicals as contaminants in the food chain: a Network of Excellence for research, risk assessment and education; http://www.cascadenet.org/projectweb/portalproject/Index.html analysed BPA because of its oestrogenic properties and potential of contaminating food and water providing a risk assessment model and new analytical methods.
Newgeneris-projektet Development and application of biomarkers of dietary exposure to genotoxic and immunotoxic chemicals and of biomarkers of early effects, using mother-child birth cohorts and biobanks - http://www.newgeneris.org/. vedrørende nyfødte og risiciene forbundet med genotoksisk eksponering analyserer moderkagetransport af BPA, blandt andre forurenende stoffer, for at vurdere de eventuelle virkninger for udvikling af sygdom, herunder navnlig cancer hos børn.
The project NEWGENERIS Development and application of biomarkers of dietary exposure to genotoxic and immunotoxic chemicals and of biomarkers of early effects, using mother-child birth cohorts and biobanks; http://www.newgeneris.org/ on newborns and genotoxic exposure risks analyses the placental transport of BPA, among other contaminants, in order to assess its possible influence on disease development, especially cancer in children.
Contamed-projektet http://www.contamed.eu/. undersøger forbindelsen mellem kombineret eksponering for hormonforstyrrende kemiske stoffer på fosterstadiet og forsinkede uønskede virkninger for reproduktionen.
The project CONTAMED http://www.contamed.eu/ examines the link between combined exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals in foetal life and delayed adverse effects on human reproductive health.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007862/2011
Question for written answer E-007862/2011
Om: Arrangerede ægteskaber i Etiopien
Subject: Arranged marriages in Ethiopia
Bekymrer det Kommissionen, at piger helt ned til niårsalderen er ofre for arrangerede ægteskaber med mænd på op til 50 og derover i Etiopien?
Is the Commission concerned about the fact that girls as young as 9 years old are the victims of arranged marriages to men as old as 50 and older in Ethiopia?
Føler Kommissionen, at der kan gøres noget for at standse denne forfærdelige praksis?
Does the Commission feel that any action could be taken to stop this appalling practice?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007863/2011
Question for written answer E-007863/2011
Om: ISDA og »credit event«
Subject: ISDA and credit events
Hvordan afgøres det ifølge Kommissionen, hvorvidt der er tale om en »credit event« i forbindelse med køb af græske statsobligationer?
In the Commission's opinion, how is it decided whether the rollover of Greek Government bonds constitutes a credit event?
Kan en »default rating« fra et kreditvurderingsinstitut ifølge Kommissionen føre til en »credit event«?
In the Commission's opinion, will a default rating by one of the credit rating agencies lead to a credit event?
Eksisterer der, ifølge Kommissionen, hos organet ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives Association) en klarere beskrivelse af begrebet »credit event«?
Does the Commission think that the ISDA, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, has a clear and unambiguous definition of the concept of ‘credit event’?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at hedgefondene D.E. Shaw, Citadel og Blue Mountain Capital sidder i ISDA's udvalg, og at de derved er med til at afgøre, om der skal udløses en CDS Financial Times: »Greek crisis puts future of CDS in doubt«, 23.6.2011. ?
Is the Commission aware that the hedge funds D.E. Shaw, Citadel and Blue Mountain Capital sit on an ISDA Committee and that they can thereby determine whether a credit default swap (CDS) will be triggered Financial Times : ‘Greek crisis puts future of CDS in doubt’, 23.6.2011. ?
Betyder det i denne henseende noget for Kommissionen, at disse parter ikke er transparente og ikke skal stå til ansvar over for nogen?
In the Commission's opinion, is it relevant in this issue that these parties are neither transparent nor accountable to anyone?
Finder Kommissionen det ønskværdigt, at parter, som deltager i ISDA's udvalg selv har en direkte interesse i udfaldet af beslutningen om, hvorvidt der er tale om en »credit event«?
Does the Commission regard it as desirable that parties with representatives on an ISDA Committee themselves have a direct interest in the outcome of the decision on whether there is a credit event?
Ved Kommissionen, i hvilket omfang ovennævnte hedgefonde ejer »credit default swaps« på den græske statsgæld?
Does the Commission know to what extent the abovementioned hedge funds are in possession of credit default swaps on the Greek Government debt?
Ved Kommissionen, hvilke parter der har udstedt »credit default swaps« på den græske statsgæld og ejer dem?
Does the Commission have any information about which parties have issued and possess credit default swaps on the Greek Government debt?
I bekræftende fald, har Kommissionen da i sinde at dele denne viden med os?
If so, is the Commission prepared to share that information with us?
I benægtende fald, mener Kommissionen da, at det er nødvendigt at finde ud af det?
If not, does the Commission not consider it necessary to find this out?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007864/2011
Question for written answer E-007864/2011
Om: Facebook Phonebook
Subject: Facebook Phonebook
Med en funktion i Facebooks mobilapplikation kan brugere af Facebook nu synkronisere telefonbogen i deres smartphone med deres venneliste på det sociale netværkssted i Facebook Phonebook.
With a feature on Facebook's mobile application, Facebook allows users to synchronise their smartphone contacts with their contacts on the social networking site in Facebook Phonebook.
Numrene på Facebook Phonebook-siden hentes fra a) venner, som har valgt at dele deres telefonnummer på deres profil, og b) telefonnumre, der allerede ligger i din telefon.
The numbers on the Facebook Phonebook page are compiled from (a) friends that decided to share their phone number on their profile and (b) phone numbers already in your phone.
Brugeren kan kun slå synkroniseringen fra ved at ændre indstillingerne på Facebook.
A user can disable the synchronisation only after changing the settings on Facebook.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med denne nye funktion i Facebooks mobilapplikation?
Is the Commission aware of this new feature on Facebook's mobile application?
Er Kommissionen klar over, at Facebook via denne nye funktion får adgang til telefonnumre til brugere, som aldrig selv har givet deres telefonnummer til Facebook?
Does the Commission realise that with this new feature Facebook gains access to phone numbers of users who never gave their phone number to Facebook themselves?
Mener Kommissionen, at denne nye applikation er i overensstemmelse med EU's lovgivning om databeskyttelse, nærmere bestemt med direktiv 95/46/EF og direktivet om databeskyttelse inden for elektronisk kommunikation?
Does the Commission consider this new application to be in line with EU data protection laws, more specifically with Directive 95/46/EC and the e-Privacy Directive?
Hvad agter Kommissionen at gøre for at sikre, at EU's lovgivning om databeskyttelse overholdes fuldt ud?
What will the Commission do to ensure that EU data protection laws are fully respected?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007865/2011
Question for written answer E-007865/2011
Marietje Schaake (ALDE) , Barbara Lochbihler (Verts/ALE) , Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE) , Johannes Cornelis van Baalen (ALDE) , Tunne Kelam (PPE) og Ivo Vajgl (ALDE)
Marietje Schaake (ALDE) , Barbara Lochbihler (Verts/ALE) , Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE) , Johannes Cornelis van Baalen (ALDE) , Tunne Kelam (PPE) and Ivo Vajgl (ALDE)
Om: VP/HR — Undersøgelse af europæiske firmaers rolle ved krænkelser af menneskerettighederne (anden del) og eksport af teknologier med dobbelt anvendelse
Subject: VP/HR — Inquiry into role of European companies in human rights violations (part II) and the export of dual-use technologies
Vi henviser til Kommissionens svar af 20. maj 2011 på forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E‑002212/2011 —»Undersøgelse af europæiske firmaers rolle ved krænkelser af menneskerettighederne«, som blev indgivet den 9. marts 2011, samt Kommissionens skrivelse af 1. juni 2011.
We refer to your answer of 20 May 2011 to Written Question E‑002212/2011 —‘Inquiry into role of European companies in violation of human rights’, tabled on 9 March 2011, and your letter of 1 June 2011.
Det er ubestrideligt, at teknologier importeret fra EU og designet af europæiske virksomheder http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/news-events/press-room/statement-to-the-public-hearing-on-new-information-technologies-and-human-rights. anvendes af undertrykkende regimer.
It is undisputed that technologies imported from the EU and designed by European companies http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/news-events/press-room/statement-to-the-public-hearing-on-new-information-technologies-and-human-rights are being used by repressive regimes.
I Egyptens tilfælde har aviserne ofte skrevet http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703652104576122044234987416.html;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-03/vodafone-ordered-to-send-egyptian-government-messages-update1-.html. om det europæiske telefonselskab Vodafone, hvis aktiviteter var direkte kontrolleret af det tidligere Mubarakregime, og at det nedlagde sine tjenester, mens det udsendte regeringsvenlige sms-beskeder.
Concerning the case of Egypt, newspapers have extensively reported http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703652104576122044234987416.html;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-03/vodafone-ordered-to-send-egyptian-government-messages-update1-.html about the European telephone company Vodafone conducting its business under the direct control of the former Mubarak regime, in shutting down its services whilst sending pro-government text messages.
Endvidere er der i Bloombergs undersøgende journalistik sat fokus på de finsk-tyske Nokia Siemens-net i Bahrain http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2011-08-22/torture-in-bahrain-becomes-routine-with-help-from-nokia-siemens-networking.html. .
Additionally, investigative journalism by Bloomberg has highlighted the role of Finnish/German Nokia Siemens Networks in Bahrain http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2011-08-22/torture-in-bahrain-becomes-routine-with-help-from-nokia-siemens-networking.html .
Kan den højtstående repræsentant forklare, hvorvidt hun og/eller Kommissionen har beføjelse til — og i givet fald er parat til — at indlede en undersøgelse af, hvorvidt forretningsaktiviteterne og adfærden hos europæiske ikt- sikkerheds- og telekomvirksomheder og disses datterselskaber, dvs. virksomheder, som har juridisk hjemsted i Europa, kan have bidraget til krænkelser af menneskerettighederne, særlig i Tunesien, Egypten, Syrien, Bahrain og Iran, eller risikerer at gøre det fremover?
Can the High Representative explain whether she and/or the Commission has the power, and if so, is willing, to start an inquiry into whether the business operations and conduct of European ICT, security and telecom companies and their subsidiaries, i.e. those with a legally registered office in the EU, might have contributed to human rights violations, in particular in Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Bahrain and Iran, or might do so in the future?
Er den højtstående repræsentant enig i, at eksport af ikt samt andre enheder og software med dobbelt anvendelse til stater og statsejede virksomheder med undertrykkende regeringer er blevet medvirkende til krænkelse af menneskerettighederne?
Does the High Representative agree that the export of ICT, as well as other technological dual-use items and software, to states and state-owned companies with repressive governments has become instrumental in the violation of human rights?
Er den højtstående repræsentant enig i, at en mere omfattende mekanisme for EU‑eksport og -tilladelser for teknologier med dobbelt anvendelse bør fastlægges og vedtages som EU‑lovgivning med henblik på at forhindre, at europæiske virksomheder og europæisk teknologi bliver middel og medvirkende til krænkelse af menneskerettighederne?
Does the High Representative agree that a more comprehensive EU export and licensing mechanism for dual-use technologies should be established, and laid down in EC law, in order to prevent European companies and technologies from becoming an accessory to and instrumental in human rights violations?
Er den højtstående repræsentant i givet fald parat til at presse på for, at Kommissionen og/eller Rådet fremsætter nye lovgivningsmæssige forslag, herunder fortsat reviderede og ajourførte »lister« over potentielt skadelige teknologier og en (global) mekanisme til tidlig varsling, som omfatter meddelelse om begrænsning af ytringsfriheden, pressefriheden, internetfriheden og misbrug af europæisk ikt-teknologi til krænkelse af folks universelle menneskerettigheder?
If so, is the High Representative willing to press for new legislative initiatives by the Commission and/or the Council, including continuously reviewed and updated ‘lists’ of potential harmful technologies, and a (global) early warning mechanism that includes the notification of the deterioration of freedom of expression, freedom of the press, Internet freedom and the misuse of European ICT technology in violating people's universal human rights?
Er den højtstående repræsentant enig i, at der skal stilles krav til de europæiske virksomheder om at indføre interne foranstaltninger og efterlevelsesordninger med henblik på at overholde EU's eksportrestriktioner vedrørende teknologier med dobbelt anvendelse, og at der skal være konsekvenser for ikke at overholde bestemmelserne?
Does the High Representative agree that European companies should be required to implement internal measures and compliance mechanisms to comply with EU export restrictions on dual-use technologies, and should face the consequences in case of breach of those provisions?
Er den højtstående repræsentant enig i, at både EU og de europæiske virksomheder skal gøre en indsats for at øge opmærksomheden, både i og uden for EU, omkring det tveæggede sværd, som teknologier kan udgøre, og hvordan slutbrugerne kan beskytte sig mod misbrug, herunder ved at udarbejde en EU‑adfærdskodeks for ikt og telekom?
Does the High Representative agree that both the EU and European companies should make efforts to raise awareness, both inside and outside the EU, of the double-edged sword technologies can represent and of how end-users can protect themselves against misuse, including the drafting of an EU code of conduct for ICTs and telcos?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007866/2011
Question for written answer E-007866/2011
Om: Spareforanstaltninger inden for visse EU‑politikker
Subject: Austerity measures in certain EU policies
Kan Kommissionen oplyse mig om, hvilken type spareforanstaltninger der er blevet indført inden for følgende områder: 1.
Can the Commission inform me what kind of austerity measures have been introduced in the following areas: 1.
EU's udviklingspolitik 2.
EU development policy; 2.
EU's nordlige dimension 3.
The EU Northern Dimension policy; 3.
Ploteus — portalen om europæiske læringsmuligheder 4.
Ploteus — Portal on Learning Opportunities throughout the European Space; 4.
EU's politik for Middelhavsområdet og Mellemøsten 5.
The EU Mediterranean and Middle East policy; 5.
EU's Marco Polo-program 6.
The EU Marco Polo programme; 6.
EU's internationale kulturelle samarbejde 7.
EU international cultural cooperation; 7.
EU's politik om interkulturel læring 8.
The EU intercultural learning policy; 8.
EU's Strukturpolitiske Førtiltrædelsesinstrument 9.
The EU Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA) policy; 9.
EU's instrument til førtiltrædelsesbistand 10.
The EU Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA); 10.
EU's Galileoprogrammidler 11.
The EU Galileo programme funds; 11.
Det europæiske instrument for demokrati og menneskerettigheder (EIDHR) 12.
The European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR); 12.
EU's valgobservationsmissioner?
The EU election observation missions policy?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007867/2011
Question for written answer E-007867/2011
EU's postkonfliktoperationer 2.
EU post-conflict operations; 2.
EU's miljøpolitik 3.
EU environmental policy; 3.
EU's politik om grøn og vedvarende energi 4.
the EU green energy and renewable energy policy; 4.
Den europæiske naboskabspolitik 5.
the EU neighbourhood policy; 5.
EU's udenrigspolitik 6.
the EU foreign affairs policy; 6.
EU's Udenrigstjenestes politik 7.
the European external service policy; 7.
Den Europæiske Udviklingsfonds aktiviteter 8.
the activity of the European Development Fund; 8.
EU's politik om klimaændringer 9.
EU climate change policy; 9.
EU's udvidelsespolitik 10.
EU enlargement policy; 10.
EU's bistands- og udviklingspolitik 11.
EU Aid and Development policy; 11.
Euro-Middelhavs-partnerskabet (EUROMED) og 12.
the Euro-Mediterranean partnership (EUROMED); 12.
EU's nødhjælpsoperationer, som håndteres af ECHO?
the European Union’s relief operations, as handled by ECHO?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007868/2011
Question for written answer E-007868/2011
En flamsk passager hos Ryanair blev i sommer afkrævet ikke mindre end 372 EUR, fordi han havde bestilt en billet i sit kaldenavn »Jules« i stedet for i sit rigtige navn, »Julien«.
Last summer a Flemish Ryanair passenger had to pay no less than EUR 372 because he had booked a ticket under his familiar name of ‘Jules’ instead of his official name of ‘Julien’.
Ifølge webstedet tager Ryanair et beløb for navneændring på højst 150 EUR, men manden blev tvunget til at bestille en ny billet (256 EUR) og fik derudover en bøde på 116 EUR, mens den oprindelige billet kostede 82,49 EUR.
According to its website Ryanair charges a maximum fee of EUR 150 for a name change, but the man was obliged to book a new flight (EUR 256) and in addition was fined EUR 116, while his original flight cost EUR 82.49.
Da han kom hjem igen, indsendte manden en klage, men fik at vide, at han ikke havde ret til tilbagebetaling, eftersom han med bestillingen havde accepteret situationen, og at sagen derfor var lukket.
On returning home, the man subsequently submitted a complaint, but was informed that he was not entitled to a refund since he had accepted all the conditions at the time of booking and that therefore the matter was now closed.
Mener Kommissionen, at denne situation er i overensstemmelse med europæisk lovgivning?
Does the Commission consider this situation to be in accordance with European legislation?
Hvilke skridt agter Kommissionen at tage, hvis det viser sig, at Ryanair ikke overholder de europæiske bestemmelser i denne forbindelse, og med hvilken tidshorisont?
What measures does it intend to undertake, should it emerge that Ryanair is in breach of the relevant European legislation, and by what date?
Hvilke andre instanser kan den ramte passager henvende sig til?
Which other authorities can the affected passenger contact for help?
Hvilke forholdsregler eller initiativer tager Kommissionen for at undgå, at sådanne situationer opstår i fremtiden?
What steps or initiatives is the Commission taking to prevent similar situations in the future?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007869/2011
Question for written answer E-007869/2011
Om: Appel imod nedlæggelse af EU's støtte til den britiske ngo FAIR (Families Acting for Innocent Relatives)
Subject: Appeal against the termination of EU funding to a British NGO FAIR (Families Acting for Innocent Relatives)
Organisation Docklands Victims' Association (DVA) i min valgkreds i London har henledt min opmærksomhed på en anden organisation i Det Forenede Kongerige ved navn FAIR (Families Acting for Innocent Relatives), som er i økonomiske vanskeligheder, fordi den har mistet sin EU‑støtte.
An organisation in my London constituency, called Docklands Victims’ Association (DVA), has drawn to my attention the financial hardship caused by the withdrawal of EU funding to another UK organisation called FAIR (Families Acting for Innocent Relatives).
DVA hævder, at nedlæggelsen af EU's støtte til FAIR skyldtes en administrativ fejl i Kommissionen, som nu undersøges.
It is claimed by DVA that termination of EU funding for FAIR was an administrative error by the Commission which is now being investigated.
Stedet er efterfølgende blevet en tværreligiøs mindeplads for ofrene for terrorangrebet.
The site has subsequently become a multi-faith memorial to the victims of the terrorist atrocity.
Kan Kommissionen revidere sagen om støtte til FAIR og, hvis det er korrekt, at den har valgt at ikke længere at støtte organisationen, forklare årsagerne hertil?
Can the Commission review the case of its funding of FAIR and explain why, if it is true that it has decided to discontinue supporting it?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007870/2011
Question for written answer E-007870/2011
Om: Uoverensstemmelser mellem Spaniens og Det Forenede Kongeriges bestemmelser om genregistrering og import af motorkøretøjer
Subject: The inconsistency in regulations between Spain and the United Kingdom in the re-registration and importation of motor vehicles
Jeg har modtaget en klage fra en brite, som nu er bosiddende i Barcelona, Spanien, men tidligere boede i min valgkreds, London, over, at det britiske køretøjsregister, DVLA (Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency), har givet hende en bøde på 80 GBP, fordi hun ikke havde indsendt bilens britiske V5‑registreringsbevis og meddelt, at køretøjet var eksporteret fra Det Forenede Kongerige permanent.
A British resident of Barcelona, Spain, who previously resided in my UK constituency of London, has complained to me that the UK DVLA (Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency) has imposed a GBP 80 fine for failing to surrender her UK V5 car registration document and declare the car as permanently exported from the UK.
Vælgeren hævder, at hun var forpligtet til at overdrage V5‑beviset til de spanske myndigheder for lovligt at kunne importere bilen til Spanien og få spansk nummerplade og registrering.
The constituent claims she was required by the Spanish authorities to hand over the V5 document to them in order to legally import the car to Spain and acquire Spanish number plates and registration.
Hvad foreskriver eventuelle EU‑love om eksport og import af motorkøretøjer fra en medlemsstat til en anden, og hvordan kan begge stater kræve at få tilsendt det samme dokument?
What are the EC laws, if any, regulating the exporting and importing of a motor vehicle from one Member State to another and how can both States require the same document to be in their possession?
Mener Kommissionen, at bøden fra DVLA er rimelig og i overensstemmelse med EU's lovgivning?
Does the Commission consider the DVLA fine imposed reasonable or consistent with EU regulations?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007871/2011
Question for written answer E-007871/2011
Om: Behandling af affald fra Napoli i nederlandske affaldsbehandlingsanlæg
Subject: Processing of waste from Naples by Dutch waste management companies
Er det Kommissionen bekendt, at nederlandske affaldsbehandlingsanlæg, herunder virksomheden AVR i Gansewinkel, skal behandle 248 000 t brændbart affald fra Napoli?
Is the Commission aware that Dutch waste disposal companies, including the firm AVR-Van Gansewinkel, are going to process 248 000 tonnes of combustible waste from Naples?
Det er velkendt, at der er problemer med behandlingen af affald i Italien, nærmere betegnet i Napoli, og at den italienske mafia spiller en rolle i den forbindelse.
There are well-known problems with the disposal of waste in Italy, and specifically in Naples, and with the role in this respect of the Italian mafia.
Hvordan ser Kommissionen i betragtning heraf denne udlicitering af det italienske affaldsproblem?
In the light of this, how does the Commission view the outsourcing of the Italian waste problem?