natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
glæder sig over, at Parlamentets krav om, at medlemsstater, der har eller mistænkes for at have gjort sig skyldige i forsømmelser vedrørende beskyttelse af EU's finansielle interesser, skal identificeres offentligt, er slået igennem i årsberetningen for 2000 og i særberetningerne offentliggjort i årets løb, idet disse allerede indeholder henvisninger til konkrete medlemsstater; beklager, at Retten Svar på spørgeskema, punkt 6.1.
Welcomes the fact that as regards Parliament's demand for "naming" specific Member States found or suspected to be deficient in protecting the financial interests of the Union, the annual report for 2000 and the special reports published during the year already contain references to individual Member States; regrets that the Court Replies to questionnaire, paragraph 6.1.
ikke finder det hensigtsmæssigt i et bilag til årsberetningen at opføre de forsømmelser, som de enkelte medlemsstater har gjort sig skyldige i, på en let læselig måde;
does not consider it appropriate to list in an annex to the annual report the individual errors identified in each Member State in an easily readable way;
påskønner, at Retten tillægger det stor betydning at forbedre præsentationen af sine revisionsbemærkninger i de forskellige beretninger med henblik på at gøre dem mere brugervenlige gennem anvendelse af mere informative overskrifter og fremhævelse af anbefalingerne, men afventer den videre udvikling inden det udtaler sig om resultatet;
Welcomes the priority being given by the Court to improving the presentation of its audit observations in its reports so as to make them more consumer-friendly by the use of more informative headings and more clearly identified recommendations but waits for action on this before making a judgment on its success;
Anmodninger til Revisionsretten
Requests made to the Court of Auditors
; opfordrer Retten i dens nye sammensætning efter de udnævnelser, der trådte i kraft pr. 1. januar 2002, til at træffe formel afgørelse om dette spørgsmål og skriftligt meddele Budgetkontroludvalget resultatet heraf inden den 1. juli 2002;
; invites the Court as recomposed following the new appointments made with effect from 1 January 2002 to take a formal decision on this issue and communicate it in writing to the Committee on Budgetary Control by 1 July 2002;
anmoder Retten om i sit arbejdsprogram for 2003 at indføje en oversigt over, hvornår Rettens særberetninger forventes færdiggjort;
Asks the Court to include in its work programme for 2003 a timetable indicating anticipated completion of the Court's special reports;
henviser til punkt 19 i ovennævnte beslutning af 4. april 2001, hvori det anmoder Retten om at udvide sine revisioner til også at omfatte Rådet, således at Parlamentet i givet fald får mulighed for at fremsætte bemærkninger til gennemførelsen af denne institutions budget som led i decharge-proceduren;
Recalls paragraph 19 of its abovementioned decision of 4 April 2001 requesting the Court to extend its auditing activities to the Council, thus enabling Parliament, if appropriate, to make observations on the implementation of that institution's budget in the framework of the discharge procedure;
bemærker med glæde, at årsberetningen for 2000 indeholder bemærkninger vedrørende Rådet (udgifter til tjenesterejser, opførelse af afskrivning af bygninger), som Rådet venligt har svaret på;
Notes with satisfaction that the annual report for 2000 contains remarks concerning the Council (mission expenses, entry of depreciation of buildings in the balance sheet) to which the Council has consented to reply (paragraphs 7.2 and 7.12);
understreger, at det påhviler Parlamentet at sikre, at de europæiske skatteydere betjenes godt, samt at det har pligt til at sørge for, at de får valuta for pengene;
Emphasises that the Parliament has a responsibility to ensure that the European taxpayer is well served and that it has a duty to ensure value for money;
påpeger, at holdningerne hos nogle af organisationerne repræsenteret i ØSU i stigende grad er blevet kanaliseret gennem Parlamentet i de senere år;
Points out that in recent years the views of some of the organisations represented in the ESC have been increasingly channelled through the European Parliament;
henviser til, at den sociale protokol, der blev omtalt første gang i Maastricht-traktaten og senere medtaget i kapitlet om sociale bestemmelser i Amsterdam-traktaten (artikel 138) danner grundlag for konsultation af arbejdsmarkedets parter i forbindelse med fastlæggelse af de relevante politikker;
Notes that the Social Protocol first referred to in the Maastricht Treaty, and later incorporated into the Social Chapter of the EC Treaty (Article 138) makes provision for the social partners to be consulted in the formulation of policy;
påpeger, at ØSU kun kan høres om fastlæggelse af de forskellige politikker samt kan komme med anbefalinger, hvorimod dialogen med arbejdsmarkedets parter kan føre til bindende lovgivning;
Points out that the ESC can only be consulted on the formulation of policy and can make recommendations but that the social dialogue by contrast can lead to binding legislation;
er på den ene side foruroliget over, at arbejdsmarkedets parter er utilfredse med de få ressourcer, de har til rådighed til den sociale dialog; fastslår på den anden side, at ØSU's endelige budget i 2000 androg EUR 80.976.436; henviser til, at udvidelsen forventes at bringe de årlige udgifter op på EUR 99,6 mio. inden 2004 ØSU's beretning til budgetmyndigheden, oktober 2001.
Is concerned on the one hand that the social partners are critical about the lack of resources available to them for the social dialogue and on the other hand notes that in 2000 the ESC's final budget was EUR 80 976 436; enlargement is expected to bring its annual expenditure up to EUR 99.6 million ESC report to the budgetary authorities, October 2001.
(selv om dette delvis omfatter fælles udgifter med Regionsudvalget);
by 2004 (although some of this includes joint costs with the CoR);
henviser til, at det er første gang, siden Amsterdam-traktaten trådte i kraft og den sociale dialog blev indført, at Parlamentet har haft mulighed for at tage stilling til, i hvilket omfang ØSU giver valuta for pengene;
Points out that this is the first time the Parliament has had the opportunity to assess the value for money of the ESC since the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty and since the social dialogue has been set up;
erkender, at ØSU kan være forum for interessegrupper, der ellers ikke ville kunne blive hørt i EU-sammenhæng;
Recognises that the ESC can act as a forum for interest groups which would not otherwise be able to make their voices heard in the EU context;
mener, at der reelt set kan stilles spørgsmålstegn ved, hvorvidt det giver valuta for pengene at opretholde både ØSU og den sociale dialog;
Believes that there is a real question as to the value for money of running both the ESC and the social dialogue;
understreger, at det er medlemsstaternes ansvar at udpege medlemmerne af ØSU; henstiller til medlemsstaterne nøje at undersøge deres repræsentation i ØSU i forbindelse med den kommende fornyelse af medlemskabet;
Points out that responsibility for nominating Members of the ESC lies with the Member States; urges the Member States to examine carefully their representation within the ESC in the context of the forthcoming renewal of its membership;
er af den opfattelse, at ØSU's medlemmer må gøre sig større anstrengelser for at sikre, at information om ØSU's aktiviteter når frem til græsrødderne, dvs. fagforeningsmedlemmer i medlemsstaterne;
Takes the view that ESC Members must improve their efforts to ensure that information about the ESC's activities reaches the grass roots, e.g. trade unionists in the Member States;
henstiller til ØSU at fortsætte sine moderniseringsbestræbelser;
Urges the ESC to continue its efforts on the path towards modernisation;
opfordrer ØSU til at øge bestræbelserne på at høre et så bredt netværk af nationale kontakter som muligt for at øge sin synlighed;
Invites the ESC to redouble its efforts to consult as wide a network as possible of national contacts in order to increase the visibility of the ESC;
opfordrer Kommissionen til at overveje ØSU's effektivitet og relation til de ca. 300 rådgivende organer og udvalg, der er grupperet omkring Kommissionen, for at undgå overlapninger og dobbeltarbejde;
Calls on the Commission to think again about the efficiency and significance of the ESC in the context of the some 300 existing consultative bodies and committees configured around the Commission, so as to avoid overlapping and duplication of effort;
henviser til, at Parlamentet i forbindelse med de foregående års dechargeprocedurer vedtog at udsætte meddelelsen af decharge for ØSU for regnskabsårene 1996, 1997, 1998 og 1999, indtil der forelå en afklaring på uregelmæssigheder vedrørende udbetaling af medlemmernes rejsegodtgørelser for perioden 1995-1996;
Recalls that in previous years' discharge procedures Parliament decided to postpone its decision in respect of the ESC for the financial years 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999 pending clarification of irregularities concerning the payment of Members' travel allowances in 1995-1996;
henleder opmærksomheden på punkt 2 i sin beslutning af 7. oktober 1998 EFT C 328 af 26.10.1998, s. 115.
Draws attention to paragraph 2 of its resolution of 7 October 1998 informing the Economic and Social Committee of the reasons for the postponement of the decision concerning the discharge of the general budget of the European Union for the 1996 financial year - Section VI - Part A - Economic and Social Committee OJ C 328, 26.10.1998, p.
med henblik på at kontrollere pålideligheden af den nye godtgørelsesordning, som Revisionsretten anbefaler, og vilkårene for inddrivelse af uretmæssigt udbetalte beløb; og
to enable the reliability of the new reimbursement system recommended by the Court of Auditors and the conditions for the recovery of incorrectly paid expenditure to be checked; and
for at konstatere enhver form for medvirken i eller administrativt ansvar for kontering, forpligtelse, anvisning og betaling af udgifter;
to enable the extent of administrative involvement or responsibility to be fully determined as regards the entry into the accounts, the commitment, the authorisation and the payment of expenditure;
fastslår på baggrund af Parlamentets ovennævnte beslutning af 7. oktober 1998, at:
Notes that following Parliament's abovementioned resolution of 7 October 1998:
Revisionsretten i årsberetningen for 1999 bekræftede, at ØSU i perioden fra udgangen af 1998 og frem til begyndelsen af 2000 gradvis har efterkommet anbefalingerne i udtalelse nr. 7/98 Udtalelse nr. 7/98 om effektiviteten af ØSU's metoder til inkassering af uretmæssigt udbetalte beløb og det nye system til forvaltning og godtgørelse af rejseudgifter.
the Court of Auditors confirmed in its annual report for 1999 that between the end of 1998 and the beginning of 2000 the ESC had gradually implemented the measures recommended in its opinion No 7/98 Opinion n° 7/98 on the effectiveness of the methods of recovery applied by the ESC and on the new system introduced in the ESC for the administration and reimbursement of travel expenses.
, for så vidt angår reformen af ØSU's bestemmelser og det nye system for udbetaling af godtgørelser til medlemmerne;
with regard to the reform of its rules and arrangements for the payment of allowances to its Members;
OLAF Det undersøgelsesorgan, som erstattede UCLAF pr. 1. juli 1999 (http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/olaf/mission/en.htm).
on 30 July 2001 OLAF The investigative unit which replaced UCLAF with effect from 1 July 1999 (http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/olaf/mission/en.htm).
den 30. juli 2001 færdiggjorde sin endelige rapport med konklusioner og anbefalinger vedrørende godtgørelse af ØSU-medlemmernes rejseudgifter i 1995 og 1996;
completed the final report containing its conclusions and recommendations with respect to the reimbursement of the travel expenses of Members of the ESC in 1995 and 1996;
beklager imidlertid, at OLAF ikke var særlig villig til at udlevere den endelige rapport til Budgetkontroludvalgets formand;
Regrets, however, that OLAF was unwilling to supply a copy of the final report to the Chairman of the Committee on Budgetary Control;
bemærker, at OLAF i overensstemmelse med normal praksis afleverede sin rapport til ØSU ud fra den betragtning, at det var ØSU's ansvar at videregive den til Europa-Parlamentet;
Notes that according to its standard practice OLAF delivered its report to the ESC on the understanding that it was the responsibility of the ESC to pass it on to the European Parliament;
tager OLAF-Overvågningsudvalgets konstateringer (protokol fra OLAF-Overvågningsudvalgets møde den 15. og 16. januar 2002) til efterretning, hvori det påpeges, at OLAF ikke havde været i stand til at behandle denne sag på behørig vis og at hele denne undersøgelse havde været en eklatant fiasko;
Notes the finding by the OLAF Supervisory Committee (minutes of the Supervisory Committee meeting of 15 and 16 January 2002) that OLAF had not been in a position to handle that case appropriately and that its investigation had been a failure in every respect;
tilslutter sig Overvågningsudvalgets krav om, at grundene til denne fiasko skal klarlægges totalt, og konstaterer, at der hidtil ikke er fremkommet nogen troværdig forklaring på, at
Endorses the call by the OLAF Supervisory Committee for no-holds-barred disclosure of the reasons for that failure and notes that, to date, no credible explanation has been given as to why:
undersøgerne åbenbart af deres foresatte er blevet hindret i at sende et spørgeskema til alle berørte medlemmer af ØSU
the investigators were evidently prevented by their superiors from sending a questionnaire to all the ESC Members concerned,
selv de 60 mest implicerede medlemmer af ØSU ikke er blevet afhørt af OLAF
even the 60 ESC Members most affected were not questioned by OLAF,
heller ikke de på det pågældende tidspunkt ansvarlige generaldirektører og generalsekretærer for ØSU er blevet afhørt af OLAF, selv om det blev hævdet, at de i årevis havde dækket over bedrageriet i forbindelse med godtgørelsen af rejseudgifter
the ESC Directors-General and Secretaries-General responsible at the time in question were not questioned by OLAF either although it had been alleged that they had covered up and hushed up the travel expenses refund fraud which had been committed for years;
de belgiske justitsmyndigheder ikke rettidigt var blevet inddraget, mens OLAF-undersøgerne vidste, at justitsmyndighederne ikke ville have andet valg end at henlægge sagen som forældet;
the Belgian judicial authorities had not been involved in time: the OLAF investigators knew that the courts would have no option but to take no further action because the matter had become time-barred;
anmoder OLAF-Overvågningsudvalget om at underrette Budgetkontroludvalget om resultatet af de videre undersøgelser; forventer, at der indledes disciplinærprocedurer, såfremt mistanken om, at hierarkiet i OLAF har handlet groft uagtsomt i denne sag, og at visse tjenestemænd ved deres handlinger har sat spørgsmålstegn ved deres kompetence som undersøgere, bliver bekræftet;
Requests the OLAF Supervisory Committee to notify the Committee on Budgetary Control of the outcome of its further investigations into this matter; expects disciplinary proceedings to be instituted if suspicions are confirmed that, in this case, there was gross negligence on the part of OLAF's senior management and that the actions of a number of officials called into question their competence as investigators;
finder, at der må fastlægges procedurer, som giver Parlamentets kompetente udvalg, via OLAF, adgang til beretninger, som direkte vedrører dechargeproceduren; erkender, at sådanne oplysninger skal behandles fortroligt i de tilfælde, hvor eventuelle retslige eller tilsvarende undersøgelser endnu ikke er afsluttet; opfordrer OLAF til at forelægge forslag til, hvordan sådanne oplysninger fremover kan videreformidles under forudsætning af, at der - om nødvendigt - træffes hensigtsmæssige sikkerhedsforanstaltninger;
Considers that procedures must be devised to allow Parliament's competent committee to be given access by OLAF to reports directly concerning the discharge procedure; acknowledges the need for such information to be dealt with on a confidential basis where judicial or analogous investigations are still pending; invites OLAF to submit proposals for the sharing of such information in future cases, subject if necessary to appropriate safeguards;
påskønner, at ØSU's nuværende formand og generalsekretær har været villige til at forelægge et eksemplar af OLAF's beretning - om end konfidentielt - samt al anden dokumentation, som Budgetkontroludvalgets formand og ordfører har anmodet om;
Commends the current Chairman and Secretary-General of the ESC for their willingness to provide a copy of the OLAF report, albeit on a confidential basis, and all other documentation requested by the Chairman of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the rapporteur;
beklager, at OLAF-rapporten var så forsinket, og at det, fordi den forelå alt for sent, nu ikke er muligt at gennemføre henstillingerne heri, og dette gælder både inddrivelse af yderligere beløb fra medlemmerne og disciplinærsager mod tjenestemænd;
Regrets that the OLAF report has been so long delayed and that its late arrival now obviates implementation of its recommendations either for the recovery of further sums from its Members or for disciplinary proceedings against officials;
henviser til, at de belgiske retlige myndigheder i august 2001 besluttede at henlægge sagen, bl.a. med den begrundelse, at de afslørede forhold nu lå så langt tilbage i tiden, at de faldt for forældelsesfristen i henhold til belgisk lovgivning;
Notes that the Belgian judicial authorities decided in August 2001 to file the matter without further action on the ground inter alia that the facts disclosed were now so old as to be time-barred under the Belgian statute of limitations;
konstaterer alvorlige mangler i beretningen, f.eks. at OLAF i sin egenskab af anvisningsberettiget har undladt at afhøre ØSU's siddende generalsekretærer på tidspunkterne for de pågældende forhold, og umiddelbart herefter; beklager, at beretningen, for så vidt angår de dokumenterede forhold, ikke gør det muligt fuldt ud at fastslå omfanget af det administrative ansvar;
Notes serious worries in the report, such as OLAF's failure to interview in their capacity as authorising officers the Secretaries-General of the ESC in office at the time of the events in question and immediately thereafter; regrets that as regards its substantive findings, the report does not enable the extent of administrative responsibility to be fully determined;
påpeger, at det ville have været muligt for ØSU selv at henvise sagen til UCLAF eller de belgiske retlige myndigheder, da udvalget i første omgang blev informeret om resultaterne af finansinspektørens undersøgelser i 1996, men at det undlod at gøre dette;
Points out that it would have been open to the ESC itself to refer the matter to UCLAF or the Belgian judicial authorities when it was first informed of the results of its Financial Controller's inquiries in 1996 but that it did not do so;
beklager, at der fik lov at gå så lang tid, og at de ansvarlige i ØSU tilsyneladende ikke gjorde reelle forsøg på at træffe modforholdsregler på det pågældende tidspunkt, selv om de var velunderrettede om de alvorlige uregelmæssigheder i forbindelse med godtgørelsen af rejseudgifter i 1995-1996;
Regrets that so much time was allowed to pass and the apparent lack of any real effort on the part of those in positions of responsibility at the ESC at the relevant time to take early remedial action despite clear knowledge of the seriousness of the irregularities affecting the reimbursement of travel expenses in 1995-1996;
beklager endvidere, at OLAF's undersøgelser blev vanskeliggjort af, at visse luftfartsselskaber var tilbageholdende med at bekræfte, at bestemte rejser, som ØSU-medlemmer havde påstået at have foretaget, rent faktisk havde fundet sted; finder det uacceptabelt, at der på denne måde lægges hindringer i vejen for OLAF's legitime efterforskning; opfordrer OLAF til at forelægge forslag til, hvorledes sådanne situationer kan løses på en mere stringent måde i fremtiden, hvis sådanne måtte opstå;
Regrets that OLAF was impeded in the conduct of its inquiries by the reluctance of certain airlines to confirm that specific journeys claimed for by ESC Members had actually been made; believes that it is not acceptable for OLAF's legitimate inquiries to be thwarted in this way; invites OLAF to submit proposals for dealing with such situations more vigorously should they arise in the future;
erkender, at medlemmerne af ØSU ikke modtager vederlag fra denne institution for det arbejde, de udfører på dennes vegne, ud over godtgørelse af rejseudgifter og dagpenge;
Recognises that the members of the ESC receive no remuneration from that institution for their activities on its behalf other than the reimbursement of travel and subsistence expenses;
konstaterer, at ØSU, for så vidt angår regnskabsåret 2000 og perioden frem til i dag, har påbegyndt et betydeligt moderniseringsprogram ØSU på moderniseringens vej, oktober 2000.
Notes as regards the financial year 2000 and the period to date that the ESC has embarked on a substantial programme of modernisation "The ESC on the road to modernisation", October 2000
omstrukturering af de beslutningstagende organer, herunder nedsættelse af antallet af præsidiemedlemmer;
reorganisation of its decision-making bodies including a reduction in the number of Bureau Members;
flere administrative check i forbindelse med godtgørelse af medlemmernes udgifter;
increasing the number of administrative checks on the reimbursement of Members' expenses;
udbetaling ved bankoverførsler som generel regel;
generalised payments by bank transfer;
forberedelse af udkast til en medlemsstatut;
preparatory work on the drafting of a Members' statute;
og forventer af ØSU, at det fortsætter dette arbejde i de kommende år;
expects the ESC to continue to pursue the same course of action over the coming years;
fastslår, at ØSU har undladt at gøre sit yderste for at begrænse og så vidt muligt råde bod på de tab, skatteyderne er blevet påført; henviser i den forbindelse til,
Notes that the ESC failed to make every effort to limit the loss to the taxpayer or make good that loss as far as possible; points out in this connection that:
at ØSU i betragtning af de mange år, bedragerierne har stået på, lige fra begyndelsen vurderede disse skader alt for lavt, og at der burde have været krævet et beløb på EUR 830.185,77 tilbagebetalt alene for 1995 og 1996,
right from the outset, given that there had been fraud over many years, the ESC's estimate of the loss was far too low and, for 1995 and 1996 alone, an amount of EUR 830 185.77 ought to have been claimed back,
at der rent faktisk kun er blevet tilbagebetalt et beløb på EUR 167.432,39, og at ØSU tilsyneladende har opgivet at kræve det resterende beløb tilbagebetalt;
only EUR 167 432.39 was actually repaid and the ESC has evidently dispensed with recovering the remainder;
konstaterer på baggrund af Regionsudvalgets svar på Revisionsrettens årsberetning (punkt 7.22), at udvalget ofte er ude af stand til at gøre brug af resultaterne af de andre institutioners udbud, enten af formelle grunde, eller fordi der ikke er taget hensyn til Regionsudvalgets specifikke behov;
Notes from the Committee of the Regions' replies to the Court of Auditors' Annual Report (paragraph 7.22) that the CoR is often unable to use the results of tenders organised by other institutions either for official reasons or because they do not take account of the Committee's specific needs;