natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I oktober 2009 opfordrede Rådet de af EU's medlemsstater, der er medlemmer af IMO (Den Internationale Søfartsorganisation), til om at prioritere ratificeringen af Hongkongkonventionen, idet denne for at kunne træde i kraft skal være ratificeret af 15 individuelle lande, der repræsenterer 40 % af den globale tonnage og mindst 3 % af skibsophugningskapaciteten.
In October 2009 the Council of Ministers called on the EU Member States that were members of the IMO (International Maritime Organisation) to ratify the Hong Kong Convention as a matter of priority in view of the fact that in order for it to enter into force, the Convention had to be signed by 15 individual countries accounting for 40% of world tonnage and a minimum of 3% of ship-recycling capacity.
Kan Rådet oplyse, hvilke af de EU‑medlemsstater, der er medlemmer af OMI, der har ratificeret konventionen?
I would like to ask the Council: how many EU Member States that are members of the IMO have signed and ratified the Convention?
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Rådet at træffe for at sikre, at de af EU‑medlemsstaterne, der er medlemmer af IMO, underskriver og ratificerer Hongkongkonventionen?
What measures does the Council envisage to ensure that the Hong Kong Convention is signed and ratified by the EU Member States that are members of the IMO?
Som det ærede medlem også påpeger det i sin forespørgsel, tilskyndede Rådet i sine konklusioner af 21. oktober 2009 kraftigt EU‑medlemsstaterne til at ratificere Hongkongkonventionen som en prioritet for at lette dens ikrafttræden så hurtigt som muligt og skabe en virkelig og effektiv ændring af praksis 14890/09. .
As stated by the Honourable Member in her question, in its conclusions of 21 October 2009, the Council strongly encouraged EU Member States to ratify the Hong Kong Convention as a matter of priority so as to facilitate its entry into force as early as possible and to generate real and effective change on the ground 14890/09. .
Hongkongkonventionen om sikker og miljømæssigt forsvarlig ophugning af skibe er for øjeblikket åben for enkeltstaters undertegnelse og ratifikation.
The Hong Kong Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships is currently open for signature and ratification by individual states.
Indtil videre har kun fem lande undertegnet den: tre EU‑medlemsstater (Frankrig, Nederlandene og Italien), en skibsophugningsstat (Tyrkiet) og en flagstat (Saint Kitts og Nevis), alle med forbehold af ratifikation eller accept.
Only five countries have signed so far: three EU Member States (France, the Netherlands, Italy), one ship recycling state (Turkey) and one flag state (Saint Kitts and Nevis), all subject to ratification or acceptance.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002093/2011
Question for written answer E-002093/2011
Om: Koordineret indsats i forbindelse med ophugning af skibe
Subject: Coordinated action on ship dismantling
Konventionen tager hensyn til befolkningernes ønske om en sikker og miljømæssigt forsvarlig ophugning, uden at skibsrederne og regeringerne pålægges unødvendigt store udgifter.
The Convention thus satisfies public demand for safe and environmentally sound recycling without placing an undue burden on ship owners and administrations.
I oktober 2009 opfordrede Rådet de af EU's medlemsstater, der er medlemmer af IMO (Den Internationale Søfartsorganisation), til at prioritere ratificeringen af Hongkongkonventionen, idet denne for at kunne træde i kraft skal være ratificeret af 15 individuelle lande, der repræsenterer 40 % af den globale tonnage og mindst 3 % af skibsophugningskapaciteten.
In October 2009 the Council of Ministers called on the EU Member States that were members of the IMO (International Maritime Organisation) to ratify the Hong Kong Convention as a matter of priority in view of the fact that in order for it to enter into force, the Convention had to be signed by 15 individual countries accounting for 40% of world tonnage and a minimum of 3% of ship-recycling capacity.
Ratificeringen af Hongkongkonventionen i de EU-medlemsstater, der er medlemmer af IMO, ville gøre det muligt at koordinere skibsophugningen.
Ratification of the Hong Kong Convention by the EU Member States that are members of the IMO would lead to coordinated action on ship dismantling.
Agter Kommissionen at genbehandle den europæiske lovgivning om skibsophugning for at samordne den med bestemmelserne i Hongkongkonventionen?
I would like to ask the Commission whether it intends to revise European legislation in the field of ship recycling with a view to its harmonisation with the provisions of the Hong Kong Convention.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002094/2011
Question for written answer E-002094/2011
Om: Forlængelse af atomkraftværkers levetid i Spanien
Subject: Extending the working life of nuclear power stations in Spain
Den nyligt vedtagne lov om bæredygtig økonomi i Spanien gør det muligt at udvide levetiden for atomkraftværker uendeligt.
Spain’s recently adopted ‘Sustainable Economy Law’ allows the working life of nuclear power stations to be extended indefinitely.
Regeringen har netop annonceret en tidsplan for lukning af atomkraftværker, idet de skønnes at kunne fungere mere end 40 år, og har fortsat ikke sat nogen begrænsninger for deres drift.
The government has gone from announcing a timetable for closing down the power stations to accepting that they will remain operational for more than 40 years, continuing to place no limit whatever on their operation.
Det skal understreges, at størstedelen af de spanske atomkraftværker har haft adskillige ulykker med forskellige grader af alvor, og disse gentages jævnligt.
It needs to be borne in mind that most Spanish nuclear power stations have a record of incidents of differing degrees of seriousness and that these continue to occur on a cyclical basis.
Mener Kommissionen, at atomkraftværker kan drives på ubestemt tid uden fare for offentligheden?
Does the Commission think that nuclear power stations can operate indefinitely without endangering the population?
Mener Kommissionen, at man bør tilskynde til øget anvendelse af nuklear energi på bekostning af vedvarende energi, som det er tilfældet i Spanien?
Does the Commission think that the use of nuclear energy, to the detriment of renewable energies, should be encouraged, as is happening in Spain?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002096/2011
Question for written answer E-002096/2011
Om: Voldelig undertrykkelse i Libyen
Subject: Violent repression in Libya
Ifølge oplysninger fra ngo'en Human Rights Watch er over 100 personer blevet dræbt siden sidste tirsdag som følge af den voldelige undertrykkelse i forbindelse med demonstrationerne mod regeringen i Libyen.
According to information published by the NGO Human Rights Watch, over a hundred people have died since last Tuesday in the violent repression of anti-government demonstrations in Libya.
Andre kilder hævder, at over 200 personer er blevet dræbt, og de beskriver, hvordan hærens snigskytter vilkårligt affyrede skud mod demonstranterne.
Other reports put this figure at over 200 and describe army snipers firing indiscriminately at demonstrators.
Internetadgangen er under kontrol, og internationale medier kan ikke frit og sikkert videregive oplysninger om de voldelige episoder.
Access to the Internet is severely restricted and the international media are unable to report freely and safely on the violent events taking place.
I lyset af den alvorlige undertrykkelse i Libyen bedes Kommissionen oplyse, hvilke foranstaltninger den agter at træffe for at presse Muammar al Gaddafis regering til at bringe den voldelige undertrykkelse til ophør?
In view of the scale of the repression in Libya, how does the Commission intend to exert pressure on the government of Muammar Gaddafi to end its violently repressive behaviour?
Vil EU i sin institutionelle erklæring kræve, at Gaddafi forlader den libyske regering?
Does the EU intend to request in its institutional declaration that Gaddafi step down from power in Libya?
Agter Kommissionen at støtte demokratiseringsprocessen i Libyen, eller vil Kommissionen fortsat støtte diktator Muammar al Gaddafi?
Will the Commission support the democratisation of Libya or will it continue to support the dictator Muammar Gaddafi?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002097/2011
Question for written answer E-002097/2011
Om: Seksuelle voldshandlinger mod kvinder i Egypten
Subject: Sexual assaults on women in Egypt
Samtidig med de nylige hændelser i Egypten har der været talrige rapporter om seksuelle overgreb mod kvinder, og den sag, der har fået størst medieomtale, er den om den nordamerikanske journalist Lara Logan fra tv‑kanalen CBS.
Against the backdrop of the recent events in Egypt there have been innumerable reports of sexual assaults on women; the most highly publicised case involved Lara Logan, a South African-born journalist working for the American television channel CBS.
En undersøgelse foretaget i 2008 af Egyptian Center for Women's Rights konstaterede, at 83 % af de egyptiske kvinder har været udsat for seksuelle overgreb.
A survey carried out in 2008 by the Egyptian Center for Women’s Rights revealed that 83 % of Egyptian women had been sexually assaulted.
Desuden er der stadig ikke en eneste artikel i den egyptiske straffelov, der omhandler seksuelle voldshandlinger.
But in the Egyptian Penal Code there is still not a single article dealing with the offence of sexual assault.
Har den adspurgt de egyptiske myndigheder om, hvilke foranstaltninger der vil blive truffet for at forhindre dem og for at garantere de egyptiske kvinders sikkerhed og ytringsfrihed? —
Has it asked the Egyptian authorities about what they have done to prevent these crimes and guarantee the security of Egyptian women as well as their freedom of expression? —
Vil EU nu udøve en stærk politik, der sikrer, at menneskerettighederne overholdes i Egypten, navnlig kvindernes, samt de demokratiske værdier og social retfærdighed?
Will the EU now exert strong political pressure to ensure that human rights in Egypt, and women’s rights in particular, are protected and respected in the same way as democracy and social justice?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002098/2011
Question for written answer E-002098/2011
Om: VP/HR — Iranske militærskibe i Suezkanalen
Subject: VP/HR — Iranian military vessels in the Suez Canal
I forbindelse med præsident Hosni Mubaraks fratræden, hvor Egypten har været styret af en midlertidig regering til at administrerer den daglige ledelse, har hæren siden den 10. februar i år overtaget kontrollen med landet.
Since President Hosni Mubarak resigned on 10 February 2011, Egypt has been governed by a provisional interim government to administer day-to-day affairs, and the military have taken control of the country.
Det øverste råd for Egyptens væbnede styrker garanterer, at alle regionale og international traktater vil blive respekteret, hvilket implicit bekræfter opretholdelsen af fredstraktaten med Israel uden nogen ændringer.
The Supreme Council of the Egyptian Armed Forces guaranteed, furthermore, that all regional and international treaties will be respected, thus implicitly confirming the upholding, without emendation of any kind, of the Peace Treaty with Israel.
Den 18. februar afslørede flere kilder, at Iran havde afgivet en formel anmodning til Egypten, for at to af dets krigsskibe kunne få tilladelse til at komme ind i Suezkanalen.
On 18 February, various sources revealed that Iran had made a formal request to that two Iranian worships be authorised to enter the Suez Canal.
Officielle egyptiske kilder bekræfter også, at tilladelsen vil blive givet til den iranske regering, hvilket sætter spørgsmålstegn ved fredstraktaten med Israel og skaber politiske spændinger i Mellemøsten.
Egyptian official sources have furthermore confirmed that this authorisation would be granted, thus calling into question the peace treaty with Israel and creating political tension in the Middle East.
I fald en sådan tilladelse gives, vil det desuden være første gang siden 1979, at et iransk skib sejler ind i Suezkanalen.
If the authorisation is indeed granted, this will be the first time since 1979 that an Iranian vessel has entered the Suez Canal.
Har den kendskab til denne situation? —
Is the Commission aware of this sitaution? —
Har Kommissionen allerede rettet de fornødne administrative henvendelser til den egyptiske regering for at forstå begrundelsen for en sådan beslutning? —
Has it already made the requisite approaches to the Egyptian Government in order to ascertain the reason for the decision? —
Hvilke tiltag vil Kommissionen træffe for at undgå potentiel politisk spænding i Mellemøsten og sikre opretholdelsen af freden mellem Egypten og Israel?
What action is the Union going to take to prevent possible political tension in the Middle East and guarantee the upholding of the Peace Treaty between Egypt and Israel?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002099/2011
Question for written answer E-002099/2011
Om: De portugisiske fiskeres rettigheder i Frankrig
Subject: Rights of Portuguese fishermen in France
Vi er blevet informeret om, at 18 portugisiske fiskere, som i flere år har arbejdet for virksomheden St. Malo i Frankrig, bliver truet med afskedigelse med et argument om tab af kvoten for blåhvilling.
We have been informed that 18 Portuguese fishermen who have been working for the St Malo undertaking in France for many years are now facing the threat of redundancy because the firm has lost its blue whiting quota.
I deres arbejde for virksomheden har disse arbejdere i årenes løb altid opfyldt deres betingelser for sociale sikringsordninger og betalt skat.
In all their years of service for the firm, these workers have always paid their social security contributions and taxes.
Hvordan kan disse arbejderes rettigheder sikres med henvisning til, at den pågældende virksomhed ikke ønsker at sikre dem de samme rettigheder som franske arbejdere, navnlig med hensyn til social sikring og økonomisk kompensation i tilfælde af afskedigelse? 2.
How can the rights of these workers be guaranteed, bearing in mind that the firm in question is unwilling to grant them the same rights as French workers, particularly as regards social security and redundancy payments? 2.
Hvordan forholder det sig med kvoten for blåhvilling?
What is the situation with regard to the blue whiting quota?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002100/2011
Question for written answer E-002100/2011
Om: Ahmadinejad er en perverteret krigsophidser; »udryddelse af Israel« målet for »Freedom Flotilla«
Subject: Ahmadinejad a perverse warmonger: ‘destruction of Israel’ the aim of the ‘Freedom Flotilla’
Den såkaldte »Mavi Marmara«-delegation fra Tyrkiet, der med sit skib indgik i den »Freedom Flotilla«, der sejlede til Gaza i maj 2010, har aflagt Irans præsident Ahmadinejad et besøg med henblik på »fejring« af den islamiske revolution.
The so-called ‘Mavi Marmara’ delegation from Turkey who, with their ship, formed part of the ‘Freedom Flotilla’ which sailed for Gaza in May 2010, has visited Iran’s President Ahmadinejad to ‘celebrate’ the Islamic Revolution; the nine Turkish Islamists who died on board the Mavi Marmara were also honoured.
Samtidig ærede man de ni tyrkiske islamister, der mistede livet ombord på »Mavi Marmara«.
The ‘celebration’ was dominated by bellicose exclamations such as ‘Allahu akbar, it is time to destroy Israel!’
»Fejringen blev domineret af krigslystne erklæringer, såsom: »Allahu akbar, tiden er kommet til Israels udryddelse!« Ahmadinejad udtalte desuden, at »et Mellemøsten uden Israel og Amerika« snart ville være en realitet.
Moreover, Ahmadinejad said that ‘a Middle East without Israel and America’ was close at hand.
Udryddelsen af Israel var ifølge »Mavi Marmara«-delegationen det endelige mål for »Freedom Flotilla«.
According to the Mavi Marmara delegation, the destruction of Israel had been the ultimate aim of the Freedom Flotilla.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med artiklen »Turkish Mavi Marmara Delegation in Iran: We Are Here Today With the Longing and the Determination to Build a Middle East Without Israel and America«?
Is the Commission aware of the report ‘Turkish Mavi Marmara delegation in Iran: We are here today with the longing and the determination to build a Middle East without Israel and America’?
Fordømmer Kommissionen den tyrkiske »Mavi Marmara«-delegation og den iranske præsident Ahmadinejad, som utilsløret har talt for udryddelsen af Israel?
Does the Commission condemn the Turkish Mavi Marmara delegation and Iranian President Ahmadinejad, who openly called for the destruction of Israel?
Er Kommissionen også af den opfattelse, at den tyrkiske »Mavi Marmara«-delegation og den iranske præsident Ahmadinejad er perverterede krigsophidsere?
Does the Commission agree that the Turkish Mavi Marmara delegation and Iranian President Ahmadinejad are perverse warmongers?
Er Kommissionen indstillet på fremover at kalde »Freedom Flotilla« for »War Flotilla«, da det nu er bekræftet, at flåden af skibe ikke havde noget som helst fredeligt formål, men kun var en krigslysten opvisning, der var infiltreret af islamiske terrorister, der ønsker Israel udryddet?
Will the Commission in future call the ‘Freedom Flotilla’ the ‘War Flotilla’, as it has now been confirmed that the fleet which sailed for Gaza could not have served any peaceful purpose but was motivated by purely warlike intentions due to the infiltration of Islamic terrorists seeking the destruction of Israel?
Er Kommissionen indstillet på klart at udtale sig imod en eventuel fremtidig anden »flotilla«?
Will the Commission clearly reject any future second ‘flotilla’?
Er Kommissionen indstillet på i sådanne udtalelser at udtale sig konkret til fordel for Israel og på enhver mulig måde at bistå Israel i kampen mod den hellige islamiske krig?
Will the Commission explicitly adopt a pro-Israeli policy in this connection and assist Israel in the fight against the Islamic jihad wherever feasible?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002101/2011
Question for written answer E-002101/2011
Om: Udgifter til Kommissionens publikationer
Subject: Spending on Commission publications
I 2010 offentliggjorde Kommissionen en tegneserie med titlen »En ny start« på initiativ af Den Europæiske Socialfond.
In 2010 the Commission published a comic book entitled Take two , on the initiative of the European Social Fund.
Hvor meget kostede det at udgive denne indbundne bog på alle 23 officielle EU‑sprog?
How much did it cost to publish this hardback book in all 23 official languages of the European Union?
Er dette virkelig en omkostningseffektiv måde at nå Den Europæiske Socialfonds mål på?
Is this really a cost-efficient way of achieving the aims of the European Social Fund?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002102/2011
Question for written answer E-002102/2011
Om: Nødvendigt udstyr i små regionallufthavne i Irland som reaktion på den delvise afskaffelse af forbuddet mod at medbringe væsker
Subject: Equipment required by small regional airports in Ireland to respond to the partial removal of the liquids ban
Kan Kommissionen i forbindelse med den delvise afskaffelse af forbuddet mod at medbringe væsker præcisere, hvorvidt mindre regionallufthavne i Irland og over hele EU, der kun har begrænset eller slet ingen transfertrafik, vil skulle investere i udstyr for at opfylde kravene som følge af den delvise afskaffelse af forbuddet, der gælder for transfertrafik?
With regard to the partial removal of the liquids ban, can the Commission clarify whether or not small regional airports in Ireland and secondly across the EU which have little or no transfer traffic will be required to invest in equipment in order to meet the requirements arising from the partial removal of the ban which applies to transfer traffic?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002103/2011
Question for written answer E-002103/2011
Om: Yderligere spørgsmål vedrørende tekniske krav til pitotrør
Subject: Supplementary questions about technical requirements for pitot tubes
Er der en sammenhæng mellem resultaterne af den foreløbige undersøgelse efter flyulykken med en Airbus fra Air France og ændringen af godkendelseskravene for pitotrør fra den 31. januar 2010?
Is there a relationship between the findings of the provisional inquiry into the accident involving the Air France Airbus and the amendment of the licensing requirements for pitot tubes on 31 January 2010?
I benægtende fald, hvad var så årsagen til ændringen af lovgivningen?
If not, what was the reason for amending this legislation?
Er EASA involveret i undersøgelsen efter ulykken med Air Frances Airbus, flyvning 447, fra Rio de Janeiro til Paris i maj 2009?
Is EASA involved in the inquiry into the accident involving the Air France Airbus (Flight 447 from Rio de Janeiro to Paris) in May 2009?
Er Kommissionen indstillet på at besvare disse spørgsmål hurtigere, end den besvarede de foregående spørgsmål, hvor jeg måtte vente ni måneder på svar?
Will the Commission reply to these questions more quickly than it did to my previous question, when it took nine months?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-002104/2011
Question for written answer E-002104/2011
Om: Forordning (EF) nr. 1107/2009 — Pesticidprodukter i fire forskellige zoner
Subject: Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — pesticide products in four different zones
I henhold til forordning (EF) nr. 1107/2009 vil fremtidige godkendelser af pesticidprodukter blive givet i fire forskellige zoner.
Under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, future authorisations of pesticide products will be given in four different zones.
Dette vil sandsynligvis medføre, at de kompetente myndigheder i de enkelte medlemsstater vil konkurrere om at foretage en evaluering, der skal hjælpe med at holde deres nationale »erhverv« i live.
This is likely to lead to the competent bodies and institutes of the individual Member States competing to do an evaluation which helps to keep their national ‘business’ alive.
Flere nationale myndigheder har udtrykt bekymring vedrørende et eventuelt kapløb om at sænke niveauet (»race to the bottom«) eller en tendentiøs evalueringsproces styret af nationale interesser.
Several national authorities have expressed their concern regarding a potential ‘race to the bottom’ or a biased evaluation process guided by national interests.
Er Kommissionen bevidst om dette kapløb om at sænke niveauet mellem nationale myndigheder.
Is the Commission aware of this ‘race to the bottom’ between national authorities?
Hvordan påtænker Kommissionen at sikre, at vi ikke kommer til at opleve et kapløb om at sænke niveauet mellem de nationale myndigheder?
How is the Commission intending to ensure that we will not experience a ‘race to the bottom’ between national authorities?
Hvordan vil Kommissionen sikre, at der opnås det »høje beskyttelsesniveau«, som forordningen kræver?
How will the Commission make sure that a ‘high level of protection’ is provided, as required by the regulation?
Forordning (EF) nr. 1107/2009 EUT L 309 af 24.11.2009. indeholder bestemmelser om et system for obligatorisk gensidig anerkendelse af godkendelser af plantebeskyttelsesmidler inden for bestemte zoner.
Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 OJ L 309, 24.11.2009. provides for a system of obligatory mutual recognition of authorisations of plant protection products within zones.
Med henblik herpå er EU opdelt i tre zoner for udendørs brug (stort set) og betragtes som en enkelt zone for de fleste former for indendørs brug.
To this end, the EU is divided into three zones for (roughly) uses outdoors or considered as being one zone for most of the indoor uses.
Systemet for obligatorisk gensidig anerkendelse omfatter bl.a. en fase med intensivt samarbejde mellem medlemsstaterne i den berørte zone under vurderingen af en ansøgning om godkendelse af et plantebeskyttelsesmiddel.
The system of obligatory mutual recognition includes a phase of intensive cooperation between the Member States of the zone concerned during the assessment of an application for the authorisation of every plant protection product.