natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Artiklen rejser tvivl om, hvorvidt de europæiske investeringsmidler anvendes hensigtsmæssigt.
This article raises doubts as to whether European funding is being used effectively.
I benægtende fald, påtænker Kommissionen da at forfølge sagen og undersøge, om de europæiske midler anvendes korrekt?
If not, does the Commission intend to look into this matter and examine the appropriate use of European funding?
Agter Kommissionen at trække midler tilbage i denne forbindelse?
Does the Commission intend to withdraw funding in this connection?
Hvordan vil Kommissionen sikre en korrekt anvendelse af midler ved fremtidige investeringer på dette område?
How does the Commission intend to ensure the proper use of European funding in future investments?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011183/2011
Question for written answer E-011183/2011
Om: Udgifter til EEEF
Subject: Costs of EEEF
I 2009 lancerede EU et program til støtte for den økonomiske genopretning i form af fællesskabsstøtte til projekter på energiområdet.
In 2009 the EU launched a programme to aid economic recovery by granting Community financial assistance to projects in the field of energy.
Dengang blev alle midler ikke rekvireret.
Not all the funds were contracted then, leaving EUR 146 million, around 3.7 % of the total envelope.
Midlerne er primært tænkt til kommuner og lokalsamfund, som vil investere i energieffektivitet og på den måde bidrage til at nå EU's klima- og energimål (20 %-mål).
The funds are primarily intended for municipal and local authorities which wish to invest in energy efficiency and in this way to contribute to attaining the EU’s climate and energy objectives (20 % objectives).
I forhandlingerne mellem Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet har man bl.a. debatteret gebyrerne/administrationsudgifterne.
The subject of taxes and administrative costs was one of the issues discussed in the negotiations between the European Parliament and the Council.
Ved Kommissionen, i hvilke medlemsstater der ligeledes findes mere fordelagtige finansieringsinstrumenter?
Does the Commission know in which other Member States more favourable financial instruments are available?
Og omvendt, i hvilke medlemsstater ville denne fond være det mest fordelagtige instrument?
And conversely: in which Member States would this fund constitute the most favourable instrument?
Vidste Kommissionen allerede før, at aftalerne med Deutsche Bank blev indgået, at denne fond ikke ville være et attraktivt tilbud for tyske kommuner og lokalsamfund (og i givet fald heller ikke for sådanne i andre medlemsstater)?
Was the Commission already aware before the agreements with the Deutsche Bank were concluded that this fund was not an attractive option for the municipal and local authorities in Germany (and possibly also for the other Member States)?
Hvordan vurderer Kommissionen det forhold, at der er blevet skabt et EU‑instrument, som målgruppen i flere medlemsstater slet ikke kan benytte, fordi der findes mere fordelagtige instrumenter, der skal foretrækkes på grund af den økonomiske og retlige situation?
What comments does the Commission have to make on this situation whereby an EU instrument was created which cannot be utilised at all by the target group in some Member States because there are more favourable instruments available which, for financial and legal reasons, must be given preference?
Ser Kommissionen her et behov for ændringer af EEEF eller sågar muligheder for at gennemføre tilpasninger?
Does the Commission see here the need for changes to the EEEF or even the opportunity to make adjustments?
Hvad skyldes det mere præcist, at vilkårene er så lidet attraktive?
Why is it exactly that the terms and conditions are so unattractive?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011184/2011
Question for written answer E-011184/2011
Om: Flotille til Gaza — Saoirse og Tahrir
Subject: Flotilla to Gaza — the Saoirse and Tahrir
Israel fortsætter flådeblokaden ud for Gaza.
Israel continues to operate a naval blockade of Gaza.
I november 2011 blev fartøjet Saoirse (gælisk for frihed), som sejler under det irske flag, og Tahrir (arabisk for befrielse), som sejler under det canadiske flag, bordet af israelske styrker.
In November 2011 the Irish-flagged Saoirse (Gaelic for freedom) and the Canadian-flagged Tahrir (Arabic for liberation) were boarded by Israeli forces.
Fartøjerne havde statsborgere fra ca. ni forskellige lande om bord.
The vessels had nationals from around nine different countries aboard.
Hvordan har Kommissionen forholdt sig over for de israelske myndigheder med hensyn til deres aktioner og tilbageholdelse af EU‑borgere?
What representations has the Commission made to the Israeli authorities regarding its actions and holding of EU citizens?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011185/2011
Question for written answer E-011185/2011
Om: Analyse af resultaterne i det indre markeds resultattavle fra september 2011
Subject: Analysis of results of Internal Market Scoreboard of September 2011
En effektiv, korrekt og hurtig gennemførelse af de europæiske direktiver i national lovgivning er en stor udfordring for det indre markeds funktion i EU.
The effective, correct and prompt transposition of European directives into national law is vital for the proper functioning of the EU internal market.
Det indre markeds resultattavle er et strategisk analyseværktøj, idet den gør status over situationen generelt med hensyn til de europæiske direktivers gennemførelse i national lovgivning og giver mulighed for at evaluere opdelingen af det indre marked.
In this regard, the internal market Scoreboard is a strategic analytical tool because it shows the current overall state of play as regards the transposition of European directives into national law and thus enables the fragmentation of the internal market to be assessed.
Af resultattavlen fra september 2011 fremgår det, at medlemsstaterne for første gang siden 2007 ikke når målet, som i 2007 blev fastsat af stats- og regeringscheferne, om, at der højst må være 1 % tekster, som ikke er gennemført på nationalt plan.
The September 2011 edition of this scoreboard shows that, for the first time since 2007, Member States have not met the national 1 % transposition deficit target agreed by Heads of State and Government in 2007.
Gennemsnittet ligger i øjeblikket på 1,2 %.
The current average is 1.2 %.
Tallene viser, at 14 medlemsstater udviser dårligere resultater i år end i 2007 trods de forskellige værktøjer, som Kommissionen i mellemtiden har indført, f.eks. »EU‑Pilot«-initiativet.
The figures show that 14 Member States have worsened their performance this year compared to 2007, despite the various tools that have been developed by the Commission since then, such as the ‘EU Pilot’ initiative.
Hvordan forklarer Kommissionen de seneste måneders forværring?
How does the Commission explain the deterioration of the past few months?
I øvrigt viser resultattavlen, at situationen har forbedret sig på området offentlige indkøb i perioden december 2010 til september 2011, mens den er blevet forværret med hensyn til den europæiske lovgivning, navnlig på luftfartsområdet.
In addition, the scoreboard shows that between December 2010 and September 2011, the situation improved in the area of public procurement, while it worsened for EU legislation, such as that on air transport.
Al europæisk lovgivning har således ikke samme indvirkning på borgernes og virksomhedernes hverdag og på det indre markeds funktion.
However, all EC laws do not have the same impact on the daily lives of citizens and businesses and on the functioning of the internal market.
På baggrund af ovennævnte vil det være hensigtsmæssigt at tilføje en kvalitativ analyse, der fremhæver direktiver, hvis manglende gennemførelse i særlig grad skaber problemer, i resultattavlen.
It would therefore be useful to include a qualitative analysis in the scoreboard highlighting the directives for which the transposition deficit is proving to be particularly problematic.
Hvad mener Kommissionen om dette?
What is the Commission's view on this matter?
Kan den forestille sig at tilføje en klassificering af de tekster, hvis dårlige eller manglende gennemførelse i hele EU skader det indre marked mest?
Would it consider it feasible to include in the scoreboard a classification of texts which have been incorrectly transposed, or not transposed at all across the EU, and are having the most adverse effect on the single market?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011186/2011
Question for written answer E-011186/2011
Om: Malmström: »EU har brug for flere indvandrere« (1/2)
Subject: Malmström: ‘Europe needs more migrants’ (1/2)
EU-kommissær Cecilia Malmström har fremlagt et program, der skal gøre det nemmere for indvandrere at komme ind i EU.
European Commissioner Cecilia Malmström has presented a programme intended to make it easier for migrants to enter the European Union.
Hun mener nemlig, at EU har behov for (endnu) flere indvandrere, som i fremtiden kan tage alle typer arbejdspladser.
She believes that the European Union needs (even) more migrants in order to be able to fill all the vacancies which will exist in the future.
For at opmuntre personer i tredjelande til at flytte til EU har hun endog lanceret en sand »reklamewebside«: ec.europa.eu/immigration.
To encourage people in third countries to move to the European Union in particular, she has even gone to the trouble of launching a ‘promotional website’: ec.europa.eu/immigration
Er Kommissionen bekendt med artiklen: »Malmström: EU har brug for flere indvandrere http://www.trouw.nl/tr/nl/4324/Nieuws/article/detail/3041205/2011/11/18/Malmstrom-EU‑heeft-meer-migranten-nodig.dhtml. «
Is the Commission aware of the report, ‘Malmström: EU heeft meer migranten nodig’ http://www.trouw.nl/tr/nl/4324/Nieuws/article/detail/3041205/2011/11/18/Malmstrom-EU‑heeft-meer-migranten-nodig.dhtml ?
Er Kommissionen enig med PVV i, at EU ikke har brug flere, men nærmere færre, indvandrere?
Does the Commission agree with the PVV that what the European Union needs is not more migrants but, on the contrary, fewer?
Er Kommissionen enig med PVV i, at det først og fremmest er de arbejdsløse EU-borgere, der skal have arbejde, før indvandrerne kan tage de resterende arbejdspladser?
Does the Commission agree with the PVV that unemployed EU citizens should first take jobs before migrants fill the available vacancies?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med arbejdsløshedsstatistikken i EU?
Is the Commission aware of the unemployment figures in the European Union?
Ved Kommissionen, at Spanien kæmper med en ungdomsarbejdsløshed på 44% http://www.nu.nl/economie/2551936/nederland-heeft-laagste‑jeugdwerkloosheid‑eu.html. ?
Does the Commission know that in Spain youth unemployment is running at 44 % http://www.nu.nl/economie/2551936/nederland-heeft-laagste-jeugdwerkloosheid-eu.html ?
Er Kommissionen enig med PVV i, at disse arbejdsløse vil stå uden en fremtid som følge af Malmströms foreslåede program?
Does the Commission agree with the PVV that these unemployed people are being robbed of their future because of Malmström’s proposed programme?
Er Kommissionen enig med PVV i, at Malmströms foreslåede program vil føre til øget arbejdsløshed blandt EU-borgerne?
Does the Commission agree with the PVV that Malmström’s proposed programme will increase unemployment among EU citizens?
Er Kommissionen enig med PVV i, at Malmströms »præferencepolitik« for indvandrere vil føre til forskelsbehandling i forhold til EU's borgere?
Does the Commission agree with the PVV that Malmström’s ‘preferential policy’ in favour of migrants will result in discrimination against EU citizens?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011187/2011
Question for written answer E-011187/2011
Om: Malmström: »EU har brug for flere indvandrere« (2/2)
Subject: Malmström: ‘Europe needs more migrants’ (2/2)
Kommissær Cecilia Malmström har fremlagt et program, der skal gøre det nemmere for indvandrere at komme ind i EU.
European Commissioner Cecilia Malmström has presented a programme intended to make it easier for migrants to enter the European Union.
Hun mener nemlig, at EU har behov for (endnu) flere indvandrere, som i fremtiden kan tage alle arbejdspladser.
She believes that the European Union needs (even) more migrants in order to be able to fill all the vacancies which will exist in the future.
Er Kommissionen enig med PVV i, at det er aldeles upassende at lancere en »reklamewebside«, på hvilken personer i tredjelande opmuntres til at flytte til Europa og her har mulighed for at sammenligne medlemsstaterne, hvad angår konkrete asyl- og indvandringsprocedurer, og derefter vælge »den nemmeste vej til EU«?
Does the Commission agree with the PVV that it is completely inappropriate to launch a ‘promotional website’ encouraging people from third countries to move to Europe and providing them with an opportunity to compare EU Member States in terms of their specific asylum and immigration procedures in order to be able to opt for the easiest route into the European Union?
Er Kommissionen enig med PVV i, at det er aldeles uønsket, at Malmström hovedsageligt henvender sig til indvandrere fra muslimske lande, såsom Marokko og Tunesien?
Does the Commission agree with the PVV that it is completely undesirable for Ms Malmström to mainly target migrants from Islamic countries such as Morocco and Tunisia?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvilke egenskaber hos indvandrere fra muslimske lande der er så enestående og derfor skulle være uundværlige og berigende for EU?
Could the Commission indicate what characteristics migrants from Islamic countries have that are so unique and indispensable and capable of enriching the European Union?
Er Kommissionen enig med PVV i, at medlemsstaterne, henset til den store forskel i demografisk udvikling, selv skal kunne tage beslutning med hensyn til deres asyl- og indvandringspolitik og deres arbejdsmarked?
Does the Commission agree with the PVV that, in view of the significant differences between Member States in terms of their demographic development, the latter should be allowed to take their own decisions on their asylum and immigration policy and their labour markets?
Er Kommissionen indstillet på at smide Malmströms foreslåede program, inklusive den tilhørende webside, i skraldespanden?
Is the Commission prepared to consign Ms Malmström's proposed programme, including the website, to the wastepaper basket?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011189/2011
Question for written answer E-011189/2011
Om: Beslaglæggelse af lastbiler i Italien
Subject: Seizure of trucks in Italy
Den 15. november offentliggjordes TISPOL Bulletin nr. 23/2011, der bl.a. indeholdt rapporten om det såkaldte TEN-T-program, et program under hvilket diverse inspektionstjenester i Italien håndhæver vejtransportlovgivningen.
On 15 November, TISPOL Bulletin No 23/2011 was published, containing a report on the so-called TEN‑T-programme, a programme under which various inspectorates in Italy enforce road transport legislation.
I rapporten oplyses det, at der er foretaget mere end 9 000 kontroller.
The report indicates that more than 9 000 inspections have been performed.
Halvdelen af kontrollerne vedrører lastbiler, der ikke er hjemmehørende i Italien.
Half of them related to non-Italian trucks.
Samlet blev der udskrevet mere end 1 000 bøder, og godt 120 lastbiler bliver beslaglagt.
Altogether, more than 1 000 fines were imposed, and no fewer than 120 trucks were seized.
Desuden blev en nederlandsk chauffør fredag den 14. oktober standset af italienske inspektionstjenester i nærheden af Vipiteno.
In addition, on Friday, 14 October a Dutch driver was stopped by Italian inspectors near Vipiteno.
Lastvognen mentes at være 2,5 m for lang.
His truck was found to be 2.5 metres too long.
Derefter blev chaufførens kørekort inddraget, og lastvognen blev beslaglagt.
Thereupon the driver was compelled to surrender his driving licence and the truck was seized.
Den nederlandske chauffør har stadig hverken fået lastbilen eller sit kørekort tilbage.
The Dutch driver still has not recovered either his truck or his driving licence.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med TISPOL Bulletin nr. 23/2011?
Is the Commission aware of TISPOL Bulletin No 23/2011?
Mener Kommissionen, at der ved den store italienske vejtransportkontrol bliver kontrolleret uforholdsmæssigt mange udenlandske chauffører sammenlignet med markedsandelen af udenlandske chauffører på det italienske vejtransportmarked?
Does the Commission consider that an above-average number of foreign drivers have been checked during this major Italian road transport inspection campaign in comparison with the market share of foreign drivers on Italy’s roads?
Finder Kommissionen det påfaldende, at godt 120 lastbiler ud af i alt 9 000 lastbiler blev beslaglagt?
Does the Commission consider it curious that, out of a total of 9 000 trucks, no fewer than 120 should be seized?
Mener Kommissionen, at beslaglæggelse af lastbiler og inddragelse af kørekort er alt for hårde sanktioner for en forseelse, der drejer sig om en lastbil, der er 2,5 m for lang?
Does the Commission consider seizing a truck and a driving licence to be far too swingeing a penalty for the offence of having a truck which is 2.5 m too long?
Havde det ikke været muligt at regulere lastbilens længde og afslutte sagen med en bøde?
Could not the matter have been more appropriately dealt with by altering the length of the truck and imposing a fine?
Mener Kommissionen, at det er uacceptabelt, at tilbagesendelse af et pas og udlevering af en lastbil i Italien tilsyneladende skal tage over en måned, også henset til de finansielle konsekvenser af dette?
Does the Commission consider it unacceptable that, in Italy, it apparently takes more than a month to return a passport and a truck, with all the ensuing financial consequences?
Mener Kommissionen, at gennemførelse af en harmoniseret fortolkning af anvendelsen og håndhævelsen af vejtransportlovgivningen ville være et fornuftigt skridt frem mod at hindre uregelmæssigheder som disse i Italien?
Does the Commission consider that devising a harmonised interpretation of how road transport legislation should be applied and enforced would be a desirable measure to combat abuses such as those in Italy?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011190/2011
Question for written answer E-011190/2011
Om: Genindvinding af lavenergipærer
Subject: Recycling of energy-saving light bulbs
Den 21. november skrev Svenska Dagbladet, at ca. 200 000 lavenergipærer indeholdende kviksølv uretmæssigt smides ud via den almindelige glasgenvinding.
On 21 November, the Svenska Dagbladet newspaper reported that an estimated 200 000 energy-saving light bulbs containing mercury are wrongly disposed of in standard glass recycling containers.
Hvor mange der smides ud via det almindelige husholdningsaffald er uklart.
It is unclear how many are thrown out with normal household waste.
Dette er forbundet med store risici for menneskers sundhed og for miljøet.
This poses a great risk to human health and the environment.
Ved Kommissionen, hvor stor en procentdel af lavenergipærerne der genindvindes korrekt i EU's forskellige medlemslande.
Does the Commission know the percentage figure for energy-saving light bulbs recycled properly in the various EU Member States?
I benægtende fald, hvordan påtænker Kommissionen at finde ud af det?
If not, how will it obtain this information?
Hvilke foranstaltninger påtænker Kommissionen at træffe i forbindelse med denne skandaløse håndtering af bl.a. et så farligt stof som kviksølv for at forsikre sig om, at lavenergipærerne indsamles korrekt?
What measures does the Commission intend to take regarding the scandalous handling of such a hazardous substance as mercury, with a view to ensuring that the collection of energy-saving light bulbs is carried out properly?
Svenska Dagbladets beretning peger på en skræmmende dårlig viden hos både forbrugere og ansvarlige virksomheder om, hvordan man skal håndtere lavenergipærerne.
The Svenska Dagbladet report indicates that both consumers and the companies involved have an alarmingly poor knowledge of how to handle energy-saving light bulbs.
Hvordan agter Kommissionen at følge op på, om den information, der gives til forbrugerne, rent faktisk når frem?
What follow-up action will the Commission take so that the information given to consumers actually sinks in?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011191/2011
Question for written answer E-011191/2011
Om: Emissionsreduktion og gratis emissionskvoter — Kommissionens svar
Subject: Reduction in emissions and free emissions allowances — answer from the Commission
Hvor høje er de bøder, som Østrig kan forvente i 2012 for ikke at overholde Kyotomålene? 7.
How high are the penalties that Austria faces as a result of non-compliance with the 2010 Kyoto targets?
Forventer EU, at der bliver sparet på støtten i EU‑landene, fordi man i forvejen indkasserer midler gennem emissionskvoterne?
Does the EU expect that Member States will make savings on support funding due to the revenue created by the sale of emissions allowances?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011192/2011
Question for written answer E-011192/2011
Om: Forvandling af kirken Agia Sofia i Nikaia (Tyrkiet) til muslimsk moské
Subject: Conversion of the temple of Saint Sophia in Nicaea (Turkey) into a mosque
Efter afgørelse fra det statslige generaldirektorat for vakiffer i Tyrkiet og efter det efterfølgende kontroversielle renoveringsarbejde begyndte kirken Agia Sofia i Nikaia (Iznik) den 6. november 2011 at fungere som moské.
On 6 November 2011, by decision of the Directorate-General for the ‘Wakfs’ (Turkish non-Muslim religious communities), and following controversial restoration works, the temple of Saint Sophia in Nicaea (Iznik) entered into service as a mosque.
Kirken, som er ældre end Agia Sofia i Istanbul, har en vigtig historisk betydning, idet det var her, det syvende økumeniske koncil blev afholdt i 787.
The temple, which is older than the Saint Sophia temple in Constantinople, is of particular historical significance, since it was there that the seventh Ecumenical Synod of 787 was convened.
Den fungerede som moské fra 1331 indtil 1920'erne, hvor den blev karakteriseret som museum.
It was used as a mosque from 1331 until 1920, when it became a museum.
Den administrerende direktør for vakiffer, dr. Adnan Ertem, betvivler, som et forsøg på at forsvare deres afgørelse, moskéens virkes ophør.
However, Doctor Adnan Ertem, Director-General of the non-Muslim religious communities, defending the recent decision, denied that the church had ever ceased to be a mosque, an affirmation contradicted on the website of the Turkish Ministry for Culture and belied by the actual facts.
Men det modsatte bekræftes på det tyrkiske kulturministeriums hjemmeside og af en række hændelser: I 1987, 1200 år efter det syvende økumeniske koncil, blev der i kirken afholdt et arrangement af den nu afdøde patriark Dimitrios, og den 26. oktober 2000 en gudstjeneste af den økumeniske patriark Bartholomæus, den øverste leder af de ortodokse kirker.
In 1987, 1 200 years after the seventh Ecumenical Synod, a ceremony was held at the church in the presence of the late Patriarch Dimitrios and, on 26 December 2000, a service was celebrated there by Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomeos and other Orthodox Church leaders.
Desuden har det tyrkiske kulturministerium med en ekstraordinær skrivelse af den 20. oktober 2010 oplyst, at kirken vil indgå som en af de kirker i Lilleasien, der vil have tilladelse til at afholde gudstjenester.
In an urgent communication of 20 October 2010, the Turkish Cultural Ministry announced that the temple would be one of the churches of Asia Minor authorised to celebrate Holy Mass.
Den materielle (delvise) og åndelige (fulde) ændring af det hellige sted for tilbedelse og den deraf følgende fratagelse af retten til kirkegang for de kristne i området samt andet er en direkte modsætning til principperne og værdierne i EU og FN.
The (partial) material and (total) spiritual corruption of this holy place of worship and the resulting infringement of the right of Christians from this area and elsewhere to worship there is only one example of the way in which the principles and values of the EU and United Nations are being flouted.