natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvordan ønsker Kommissionen at løse problemet med AAU'er i forbindelse med en 2. forpligtelsesperiode for Kyotoprotokollen?
How does the Commission intend to resolve the problem of AAUs in connection with the Kyoto Protocol’s second commitment period?
Håndteringen af overskuddet på emissionsbudgetter eller overskydende tildelte enheder (AAU) skal besluttes af deltagerne ved den internationale klimakonference i Qatar til december.
The handling of surplus emission budgets, or surplus Assigned Amount Units (AAUs), remains open for resolution by Parties at the international climate conference in Qatar in December.
Fuldstændig overførsel af overskydende AAU’er til Kyoto-protokollens næste forpligtelsesperiode vil bringe afbødningsindsatsens miljømæssige integritet i Kyoto-protokollens anden forpligtelsesperiode i fare.
Full carry-over of surplus AAUs into the next commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol would seriously jeopardise the environmental integrity of the mitigation efforts in the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol.
EU har på et tidligt tidspunkt truffet afgørelser, som isolerer EU‑emissionshandelsordningen og den senere beslutning om indsatsfordelingen fra de overskydende AAU’er.
The EU took early decisions to insulate our EU ETS and later our Effort Sharing Decision from these surplus AAUs.
Derfor vil de regler, som skal fastlægges for overførsel til Kyoto-protokollens anden forpligtelsesperiode, ikke få nogen indflydelse på klimaindsatsens miljømæssige integritet som fastsat i klima- og energipakken.
Hence, the rules to be decided on carry-over in the context of the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol will not affect the environmental integrity of EU climate action under the climate and energy package.
Ikke desto mindre vil EU fortsætte sine bestræbelser på at få et positivt resultat af forhandlingerne i Doha.
Nonetheless, the EU will continue to strive for a good outcome of the negotiations in Doha.
I den forbindelse vil Kommissionen fortsætte sin dialog med medlemsstaterne.
To this end, the Commission will continue the dialogue with EU Member States.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012231/2011
Question for written answer E-012231/2011
En af de vigtige dele af den aftale, som blev indgået i Durban til COP17, er aftalen om den grønne klimafond, der skal øremærke støtte til klimatilpasning og vedvarende energi i udviklingslandende.
One important element of the agreement concluded at COP17 in Durban is the agreement on the Green Climate Fund intended to earmark aid for climate adaptation and sustainable energy in developing countries.
Imidlertid er forholdene omkring denne grønne fond uvis.
However, the position of this green fund is uncertain.
Hvor meget ønsker EU at bidrage med til den grønne klimafond, og hvordan sikrer man, at det bliver nye og additionelle midler, man bidrager med?
How much does the EU intend to contribute as its share to the Green Climate Fund, and how can it be made sure that the money contributed constitutes new and additional funding?
Aftalen om den Den Grønne Klimafond er et af hovedresultaterne af Durbankonferencen om klimaændringer.
The agreement on the Green Climate Fund (GCF) is one of the key outcomes of the Durban Climate Change Conference.
I partskonferencens (COP's) beslutning er det bestemt, at Den Grønne Klimafonds bestyrelse mødes den 30. april 2012, og der henstilles til, at bestyrelsen så hurtigt som muligt sørger for etablering af fondens drift, og at den igangsætter de nødvendige foranstaltninger og procedurer med henblik på en rettidig og passende proces for supplering af fondens midler.
The decision by the Conference of the Parties (COP) foresees that the GCF Board will meet by 30 April 2012 and requests the GCF Board to ‘operationalize the Fund in an expedited manner’ and to ‘establish necessary policies and procedures, which will enable an early and adequate replenishment process’.
EU vil i de kommende måneder arbejde hen imod en formalisering af de aftaler, der er indgået i Durban.
The EU will work in the coming months with a view to formalising what was agreed in Durban.
Ved Durbankonferencen gav en række lande tilsagn om bidrag til finansiering af opstarten af Den Grønne Klimafond, herunder Tyskland og Danmark.
At the Durban Conference, a number of countries including Germany and Denmark pledged funding for the start-up of the GCF.
Der forventes flere tilsagn i løbet af 2012.
More pledges can be expected in the course of 2012.
EU‑medlemsstater giver disse tilsagn på frivillig basis og har forskellige definitioner af »nye og additionelle midler« til klimafinansiering.
EU Member States are pledging on a voluntary basis and have different definitions of ‘new and additional’ climate funding.
På nuværende tidspunkt har man ikke kunnet enes om en fælles EU‑definition.
At this stage, it has not been possible to agree on an EU‑wide definition.
EU ønsker at gøre sin del i den globale klimaindsats.
The EU is committed to doing its share in the global efforts.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012232/2011
Question for written answer E-012232/2011
Om: Fødevareskandale — økologiske producenter — Italien
Subject: Food scandal — organic producers — Italy
Italienske fødevareproducenter har ifølge medierne i et vist omfang købt råvarer fra traditionelt landbrug i Rumænien og så »forædlet« dem til økologiske produkter under videreforarbejdningen.
According to media reports, Italian food producers have been buying some of their raw materials from conventional producers in Romania and then ‘refining’ them into organic products during processing.
For landmændene og forbrugerne i mange lande er det alarmerende og frem for alt foruroligende meldinger.
These reports are creating concern and great uncertainty among farmers and consumers in many different countries.
Af hensyn til de europæiske forbrugere og landmænd kræver eksperter fælles kvalitetsmærker udstedt af en offentlig myndighed.
Experts are calling for uniform and sovereign seals of approval in the interests of European consumers and farmers.
Hvis ja, hvad er Kommissionens holdning til dette? 3.
If so, what is its position?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012233/2011
Question for written answer E-012233/2011
Om: Opfølgning på vedtagelsen af EU's handlingsplan for havfugle
Subject: Follow-up to adoption of EU Seabird Action Plan
Kommissionen udtalte i sit svar på min parlamentariske forespørgsel (E‑008118/2011) af 5. september 2011, at den som et første skridt til at sikre beskyttelsen af havfugle i forbindelse med gennemførelsen af en økosystembaseret tilgang til fiskeriforvaltningen vil vedtage en meddelelse i december 2011, dvs. inden udgangen af denne måned.
In the answer to a Parliamentary Question (E‑008118/2011) I submitted on 5 September 2011, the Commission stated that as a first step towards ensuring the protection of seabirds, in the context of the implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries management, it intends to adopt a communication in December 2011, i.e. by the end of this month.
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at denne tidsplan stadig gælder?
Can the Commission confirm that this timetable still applies?
I sit svar på min parlamentariske forespørgsel udtaler Kommissionen endvidere, at meddelelsen »vil sigte mod at reducere utilsigtede fangster af havfugle til så lavt et niveau, som det er praktisk muligt«.
In its answer to my Parliamentary Question, the Commission further states that the communication ‘will aim to reduce the incidental catches of seabirds to as low a level as is practically possible’.
Praksis fra nogle fiskerier (f.eks. i Det Sydlige Ishav under CCAMLR) viser, at hvis man anvender og kontrollerer den rette serie af afhjælpningstiltag, kan bifangsten af havfugle næsten elimineres fuldstændigt.
Practice from some fisheries (e.g. in the Southern Ocean under CCAMLR) shows that if the right suite of mitigation measures is applied and monitored, the bycatch of seabirds can be almost entirely eliminated.
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at den i sin kommende meddelelse vil sigte mod at eliminere bifangsten af havfugle, hvor det er muligt, og i øvrigt minimere den?
Can the Commission confirm that in its forthcoming communication it will be aiming for elimination, where possible, of seabird bycatch and otherwise for its minimisation?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012234/2011
Question for written answer E-012234/2011
Om: Burma — situationen for Khun Bedu, Khun Kawrio og Khun Dee De
Subject: Burma — the case of Khun Bedu, Khun Kawrio and Khun Dee De
Ifølge Amnesty International er de karenske aktivister Khun Bedu, Khun Kawrio og Khun Dee De hver blevet idømt mellem 35 og 37 års fængsel for fredelige protester.
According to Amnesty International, ethnic Karenni activists Khun Bedu, Khun Kawrio and Khun Dee De have each been sentenced to between 35 and 37 years in prison for peaceful protest.
De er alle tre ledende medlemmer af en aktivistisk ungdomsgruppe, Kayan New Generation Youth (KNGY), som udfører menneskerettighedsarbejde i det østlige Burma og i eksil.
All three are leading members of an activist youth group, the Kayan New Generation Youth (KNGY), which carries out human rights work in eastern Burma and in exile.
I 2008 førte aktivister fra KNGY en kampagne mod en ny forfatning, som regeringen havde udarbejdet uden at høre Burmas store befolkning af etniske mindretal behørigt.
In 2008, KNGY activists campaigned against a new constitution which had been drafted by the government without properly consulting Burma’s large ethnic minority population.
Khun Bedu, Khun Kawrio og Khun Dee De organiserede dissidenter, som opsendte balloner, afsendte papirbåde og spraymalede vægge med deres fredelige politiske budskaber.
Khun Bedu, Khun Kawrio and Khun Dee De organised dissidents to release balloons, launch paper boats and spray-paint walls with their peaceful political messages.
De blev efterfølgende anholdt, torteret og dømt af militæret, uden retssag, dommer eller forsvar.
They were subsequently arrested, tortured and sentenced by the military, without trial, judge or defence.
De bliver nu alle tilbageholdt i fængsler langt fra deres hjem.
They are all now being held in prisons far from their homes.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012235/2011
Question for written answer E-012235/2011
Om: Hviderusland: Heorhij Stankevitj-sagen
Subject: Belarus: the case of Heorhiy Stankevich
Ifølge Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty har Heorhij Stankevitj, som er lærer og kendt i Hviderusland som skjald og digter, udgivet sin avis »Kryvinka« i byen Besjankovitj siden 2007.
According to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Heorhiy Stankevich, who is a teacher and known in Belarus as a bard and poet, has been issuing his newspaper Kryvinka in the town of Beshankovichy since 2007.
Publikationen — som fortrinsvis dækker det sociale og kulturelle område — udkommer ikke regelmæssigt, men kun når Stankevitj kan skaffe penge nok til at trykke et oplag på et lokalt forlag.
The publication — which covers primarily social and cultural issues — is not regular and appears only when Stankevich raises enough money to print an issue in a local publishing house.
Stankevitj trykker aldrig mere end 290 kopier, da tilladelse til trykning af dette antal ikke kræver officiel registrering.
Stankevich never prints more than 290 copies, as that quantity does not require official registration to obtain permission to print it.
To lokale kvinder har hver især sagsøgt Stankevitj, fordi de bliver ved med at finde hans avis i deres postkasser, selv om de ikke abonnerer på den.
Two local women filed separate lawsuits against Stankevich on the grounds that they keep finding his newspaper in their mailboxes, although they have not subscribed to it.
Stankevitj mødte behørigt op i retten i Besjankovitj den 1. december tiltalt for »illegal mediedistribution«.
Stankevich duly appeared in Beshankovichy district court on December 1 on a charge of ‘illegal distribution of media’.
Han sagde, at politiet arresterede ham den 5. november, efter at han havde distribueret sin avis i sin bydel.
He said police arrested him on November 5 after he distributed his newspaper in his neighbourhood.
Politiet fortalte ham derefter, at de var blevet underrettet om hans avis, og derfor ville han blive indkaldt til en administrativ høring.
Police told him then that they had been notified about his newspaper, and therefore he would face an administrative hearing.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med Heorhij Stankevitj-sagen?
Is the Commission aware of the case of Heorhiy Stankevich?
Hvad er status for EU's pres på myndighederne i Minsk med henblik på respekt for menneskerettigheder og mediefrihed i Hviderusland?
What is the current state of play in terms of the EU’s pressure on the authorities in Minsk to respect human rights and media freedom in Belarus?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012236/2011
Question for written answer E-012236/2011
Om: Aserbajdsjan — Rafiq Tagis død
Subject: Azerbaijan — the death of Rafiq Tagi
Den aserbajdsjanske skribent og journalist Rafiq Tagi, kritiker af den aserbajdsjanske regering, Iran og politisk islam, døde den 23. november 2011, fire dage efter at han var blevet stukket gentagne gange under et natligt overfald i Baku.
Azerbaijani writer and journalist Rafiq Tagi, a critic of the Azerbaijani government, Iran, and political Islam, died on 23 November 2011, four days after he was stabbed multiple times in a late-night attack in Baku.
Tagi lå på operationsbordet i fire timer efter angrebet og fik fjernet milten, men det blev meddelt, at hans tilstand var tilfredsstillende.
Tagi underwent four hours of surgery after the attack and had his spleen removed, but he had been reported to be in satisfactory condition.
Han havde talt med Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty omkring en time før sin død og havde fortalt, at han var i bedring.
He had spoken with Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty about an hour before his death and said that he was recovering well.
I betragtning af, at Rafiq Tagis tilstand var stabil på dette tidspunkt, er omstændighederne omkring hans død uklare.
Considering that he was stable at that time, the circumstances of Mr Tagi’s death are not clear.
Europa-Parlamentets delegation for det sydlige Kaukasus mødte Rafiq Tagi i 2007 under et besøg i det fængsel uden for Baku, hvor han på daværende tidspunkt blev tilbageholdt.
The EP South Caucasus Delegation met Rafiq Tagi in 2007 during a visit to the prison outside Baku where he was being held at the time.
En søn af den iranske ayatollah, som i 2006 udstedte en fatwa, som opfordrede til at myrde Rafiq Tagi, har udsendt en erklæring på sin hjemmeside, hvor han roser Tagis mordere.
The son of the Iranian Ayatollah who issued the 2006 fatwa calling for the assassination of Rafiq Tagi has issued a statement on his website praising Tagi’s murderers.
Sheik Mohammed Fazel Lankarani, der ligesom sin far er en fremtrædende ayatollah, skriver på sin webside, at »den mand, som udførte dommen og behagede muslimerne, uden tvivl vil modtage en stor gave fra den almægtige«.
Sheikh Mohammed Fazel Lankarani, a prominent Ayatollah like his late father, has written on his site that ‘Without a doubt, the man who performed the sentence and pleased the Muslims, will receive a great gift from the Almighty’.
Den amerikanske ambassade i Baku har udsendt en erklæring om mordet på Tagi, som man kalder en »grufuld forbrydelse«, hvor man opfordrer den aserbajdsjanske regering til »afsætte alle nødvendige ressourcer for at få forbryderne« bragt for en domstol.
The US Embassy in Baku issued a statement on Tagi’s murder, referring to it as a ‘heinous crime’ and calling on the Azerbaijani government to ‘devote all necessary resources to bring the perpetrators’ to justice.
Vil den meddele de aserbajdsjanske myndigheder, at EU beklager denne barbariske handling, og at det er bydende nødvendigt, at der bliver gennemført en ordentlig undersøgelse?
Will it communicate to the Azerbaijani authorities that the EU deplores this barbarous act and that it is imperative that a proper investigation be conducted?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012237/2011
Question for written answer E-012237/2011
Om: Indonesien — situationen for Johan Teterissa
Subject: Indonesia — the case of Johan Teterissa
Ifølge Amnesty International blev skolelæreren Johan Teterissa sammen med 21 andre aktivister anholdt i 2007 under en regeringsorganiseret begivenhed i Ambon, hovedstaden i Malukuprovinsen, som blev overværet af Indonesiens præsident.
According to Amnesty International, Johan Teterissa, a primary school teacher, was arrested with 21 activists in 2007 during a government-organised event in Ambon, the capital of Maluku province, attended by the President of Indonesia.
De protesterende opførte en traditionel krigsdans og viste Benang Rajaflaget, som regeringsmyndighederne opfatter som et symbol for uafhængighedsbevægelsen i republikken Sydmaluku.
The protestors performed a traditional war dance and unfurled the Benang Raja flag, perceived by government authorities to be a symbol of the Republic of South Maluku independence movement.
Johan Teterissa blev angiveligt torteret af politiet under anholdelsen og de første uger af fængslingen.
During this arrest, and the first few weeks of detention, Johan Teterissa was supposedly tortured by police.
Myndighederne har undladt at give ham passende medicinsk pleje fra fængslets læger.
The authorities have failed to provide him with adequate medical care from prison doctors.
Den 15. juli 2010 besøgte en uafhængig læge fængslet for at se Teterissa, men han blev afvist.
On 15 July 2010, an independent doctor visited the prison to try to see Teterissa but was turned away.
Teterissa lider fortsat af indre kvæstelser efter torturen og anden mishandling under hans anholdelse og fængsling i 2007, og man er bekymret for, om han modtager passende medicinsk behandling i fængslet.
Teterissa continues to suffer from internal injuries as a result of the torture and other ill-treatment during his arrest and detention in 2007 and there are concerns that he may not be receiving adequate medical treatment in prison.
EU betragter Indonesien som et prioriteret land på grund af landets størrelse, dets geopolitiske betydning og dets rolle i kampen mod virkningerne af klimaændringen.
The EU considers Indonesia a priority country, given its size, its geo-political importance and its role in the fight against the effects of climate change.
Gennem de seneste år har EU og Indonesien intensiveret deres partnerskab gennem årlige ministermøder og regelmæssige embedsmandsmøder på højt niveau.
Over the past few years, the EU and Indonesia have intensified their partnership through annual Ministerial meetings and through regular Senior Officials Meetings.
EU er desuden Indonesiens største handelspartner og tegner sig for over 10 % af landets samlede udenrigshandel.
Furthermore, the EU is Indonesia’s fourth largest trading partner, representing more than 10 % of its total external trade.
Hvordan behandles menneskerettighedsspørgsmål i EU's relationer med Indonesien på denne baggrund?
Bearing all these points in mind, how are human rights addressed in the EU’s relations with Indonesia?
Er Kommissionen opmærksom på Johan Teterissas situation, og hvordan behandler man den i givet fald?
Is the Commission aware of the case of Johan Teterissa and, if so, how is his case being addressed?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012238/2011
Question for written answer E-012238/2011
Om: Gambia — situationen for Ebrima B. Manneh
Subject: Gambia — the case of Ebrima B. Manneh
Ifølge Amnesty International blev Ebrima B. Manneh anholdt at civilklædte betjente på den prodemokratiske avis Daily Observer's kontor.
According to Amnesty International, Ebrima B. Manneh was arrested by plainclothes police officers at the offices of the pro-democracy Daily Observer newspaper.
Man antog, at betjentene kom fra den nationale efterretningstjeneste, men den har efterfølgende afvist at have været involveret i anholdelsen.
The police officers were thought to be from the National Intelligence Agency, although that agency has since denied any involvement in his arrest.
Efter at Ebrima B. Mannehs familie og mange journalistkolleger gentagne gange havde forsøgt at finde ud af, hvad der var sket med ham, udsendte regeringen den 21. februar 2007 en officiel erklæring, hvori man benægtede at have noget at gøre med hans anholdelse eller vide, hvor han befandt sig.
After repeated attempts by Ebrima B. Manneh’s family and many fellow journalists to find out what happened to him, the government issued an official statement on 21 February 2007 denying any involvement in his arrest and any knowledge of his whereabouts.
Ikke desto mindre blev han i juli 2007, et år efter anholdelsen, behandlet for højt blodtryk på et hospital, med eskorte fra politiet.
Nevertheless, in July 2007, a year after his arrest, he was reportedly treated for high blood pressure at a hospital, with an escort from the Police Intervention Unit.
Hans familie har ikke haft kontakt med ham efter anholdelsen, og det er aldrig blevet bekræftet, hvor han opholder sig, selv om aktuelle rapporter tyder på, at han tilbageholdes et hemmeligt sted i Banjulområdet.
His family have had no contact with him since the arrest and his whereabouts have never been confirmed, although current reports suggest that he is being held at a secret location in the Banjul area.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med denne sag, og hvilket pres kan den lægge på myndighederne i Gambia for at tage anholdelsen af Ebrima B. Manneh op?
Is the Commission aware of this case and what pressure can it exert on the authorities in Gambia to address the arrest of Ebrima B. Manneh?
Hvilke er de vigtigste uafklarede spørgsmål i EU's forhold til Gambia, og hvorledes ser EU's økonomiske engagement ud med hensyn til bistandshjælp til landet?
What are the greatest outstanding issues in the EU’s relations with Gambia and what is the EU’s financial involvement in terms of development aid given to the country?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012239/2011
Question for written answer E-012239/2011
Om: Eurostats indsamling af statistiske data om skatteunddragelse
Subject: The collection of statistics on tax avoidance by Eurostat
Kommissionen har anerkendt den afgørende betydning af objektive og omfattende statistiske data som grundlag for analyse af medlemsstaternes økonomier og udarbejdelsen af anbefalinger til medlemsstaterne vedrørende styring af deres økonomier og nationale budgetter.
The Commission has acknowledged the vital importance of unbiased and thorough statistics as a basis for analysis of Member States’ economies and the drafting of recommendations to Member States regarding the management of their economy and their national budgets.
De seneste økonomiske og finansielle problemer i euroområdet har tydeliggjort alvoren af skatteunddragelse og skattesvig i visse medlemsstater.
Recent economic and fiscal problems in the euro area have made clear the critical role played by tax avoidance and evasion in some Member States.
Det er derfor, som et led i arbejdet med svagheder i de økonomiske og budgetmæssige rammer i EU's medlemsstater, af største vigtighed, at betydningen af skatteunddragelse og skattesvig bliver analyseret grundigt, og at der efterfølgende træffes relevante foranstaltninger.
It is therefore essential, as part of addressing weaknesses in the economic and budgetary frameworks of the EU Member States, that the role of tax avoidance and evasion is fully analysed and acted upon.
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen i lyset heraf træffe for at sikre, at Eurostat indsamler og kontrollerer statistiske data om skatteunddragelse og skattesvig i hele EU?
In light of this, what action will the Commission take to ensure Eurostat collects and verifies statistics on tax avoidance and evasion across the EU?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012242/2011
Question for written answer E-012242/2011
Om: FLEGT — frivillige partnerskabsaftaler — og EU's kapacitet
Subject: FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreements and EC capacity