natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen har til hensigt snarest muligt at forelægge et forslag til retsakt som, samtidig med at det er på linje med resolution A33/7, etablerer en ramme til indførelse af driftsrestriktioner i EF-lufthavne, der i fuldt mål benytter sig af den fleksibilitet, denne resolution giver mulighed for og byder på tilstrækkelige og nødvendige garantier for beskyttelse mod stigende støjgener fra fly for de mennesker, der bor rundt om lufthavnene.
The Commission will submit as soon as possible a legislative Proposal which, whilst being in line with Resolution A 33/7, will establish a framework for the introduction of operating restrictions at Community airports that takes full advantage of the flexibility offered by the said Resolution and offers sufficient and necessary guarantees of protection against an increase in noise nuisance from aircraft for people living around airports.
2002/C 205 E/019
2002/C 205 E/019
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2997/01
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2997/01
Om: Fodbold: uønskede virkninger af den nye transferordning
Subject: Football: undesirable effects of the new transfer system
Bosman-dommen har som bekendt gjort en ende på den gamle transferordning for professionelle fodboldspillere, fordi det var i modstrid med den frie bevægelighed på det indre marked.
The former transfer system for professional footballers was, as is well known, abolished following the ruling in the Bosman case on the grounds that it contravened the right to freedom of movement within the internal market.
Det har siden vist sig vanskeligt at finde et acceptabelt alternativ for at få en ordning på den finansielle kompensation for den dyre træning af spillerne.
It has since proved difficult to find an acceptable alternative solution to the matter of financial compensation for the high costs of training players.
Siden september har FIFA i samråd med Kommissionen indført nye betingelser for transfer af spillere, som allerede nu viser sig har uønskede og utilsigtede virkninger.
As from September 2001, FIFA, in agreement with the Commission, has introduced new conditions for the transfer of players, which are already giving rise to unintended and undesirable effects.
En spiller kan nu i mange tilfælde ved kontraktens udløb skifte klub, uden at der skal betales transferbeløb, bortset fra en mindre godtgørelse til optræningen.
In many cases players may now, when their contract expires, change employer without their club receiving any financial compensation apart from a small reimbursement for training.
Dette betyder, at den klub, der investerer i optræning af unge talenter, risikerer, at den trænede spiller flytter over til en anden klub, og at førstnævnte næppe modtager finansiel kompensation herfor.
For clubs investing in training to develop young talent, that means they run the risk that the player, once trained, may move to another club and that they will receive very little financial compensation.
Investering i optræning af spillere og spillernes forbedring for at øge deres markedsværdi er blevet af væsentlig betydning for klubber for at kunne overleve finansielt.
Investment in training players and improving their skills in order to increase their market value has become essential to the financial survival of clubs.
Navnlig for klubber i små lande, der på grund af UEFA-bestemmelserne er nødt til at spille i nationale konkurrencer, er medieindtægterne uforholdsmæssigt meget lavere end i store lande, og de kan derfor af finansielle grunde ikke længere klare sportskonkurrencen over for andre europæiske klubber.
Particularly for clubs in small countries which, under UEFA rules, are required to play in their national leagues, revenues from the media are much lower — disproportionately so — than in big countries, and they can therefore no longer compete with other European clubs for financial reasons.
Den nye transferordning har allerede nu bevirket en uheldig situation i forskellige lande.
The new transfer system has already led to abuses in a number of countries.
I Nederlandene har det bl.a. bevirket, at den nederlandske klub Ajax har sat sin spiller Arveladze på listen over ikke-aktive spillere et år inden udløbet af kontrakten for at presse denne spiller til at forlænge sin kontrakt.
In the Netherlands, for example, it led to football club Ajax suspending Arveladze a year before his contract was due to expire in order to in order to put pressure on the player to extend his contract.
I kontraktens løbetid er transferbeløbet til en klub betydeligt højere.
During the term of a contract the financial compensation required to be paid to a club is significantly higher.
Denne foranstaltning er ud fra Ajax' synspunkt forståelig, fordi nævnte spiller ved afslutningen af kontraktens ophør kan forlade klubben uden at der skal betales transferbeløb, mens Ajax ikke får nogen kompensation for de investeringer, den har foretaget.
From Ajax' point of view, this measure is quite understandable as the player in question would be in a position to leave without compensation being paid upon expiry of his contract, meaning that Ajax would receive no compensation for the investment it had made.
Ud fra både et menneskeligt og arbejdsretligt synspunkt er dette en meget uønsket udvikling.
Both in human terms and from the point of view of labour law, however, this is a very undesirable development.
Efter min opfattelse kan dette dog ikke være meningen med de nye bestemmelser, der netop er etableret for at beskytte spillere og klubber?
To my mind, this cannot have been the intention of the new rules, which were created precisely in order to protect players and clubs?
Er den rede til på kort sigt at undersøge, om forbedringer er mulige i den nye transferordning og, i bekræftende fald, også at gennemføre disse?
Is it prepared to examine as soon as possible whether improvements can be made to the new transfer system and, if so, to implement them?
Vil det være en god ide, hvis man benyttede en rangliste over europæiske fodboldklubber som udgangspunkt for størrelsen af det transferbeløb de betaler for spillere, der indtræder i deres klub?
Would it be an appropriate starting point to take a European ranking of clubs as a basis for the level of compensation paid by clubs for players joining them?
(22. november 2001)
(22 November 2001)
Den 5. marts 2001 forpligtede det internationale fodboldforbund, FIFA, efter aftale med den europæiske fodboldsammenslutning, UEFA, sig til at ændre reglerne for spillernes status og transferreglerne fra 1997, efter principper, der er fastlagt med hjælp fra Kommissionen og offentliggjort.
On 5 March 2001, the International Federation of Football Association (FIFA), in agreement with the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), undertook to amend its 1997 rules governing the status and transfer of players based on a set up principles worked out with the Commission and made public.
Den 5. juli 2001 vedtog FIFA's eksekutivkomite i Buenos Aires nye internationale transferregler.
On 5 July 2001, the FIFA executive committee, meeting in Buenos Aires, adopted the new rules on international transfers of players.
Den 31. august 2001 blev det i et fælles kommuniké fra FIFA og den internationale sammenslutning af spillerforeninger (FIFPro) bekræftet, at spillerforeningen vil deltage i gennemførelsen af de nye regler samt i FIFA's voldgiftsorganer og fodboldens internationale voldgiftsret.
On 31 August 2001, a joint press release by FIFA and the International Federation of Professional Footballer Associations (FIFPro) confirmed the latter's participation in the establishment of new rules as well as in the FIFA dispute settlement bodies and the Arbitration Tribunal for Football.
Bosman-dommen gjorde ikke en ende på hele transfersystemet.
The Bosman ruling had not put an end to the transfer system as a whole.
Den forbød udbetaling af erstatning ved kontraktens udløb i forbindelse med internationale spillerhandler inden for Det Europæiske Økonomiske Samarbejdsområde (EØS).
It had criticised the payment of allowances at the end of contracts for international transfers within the European Economic Area (EEA).
Indgåelse af længere og længere kontrakter og FIFA's forbud mod transfer, hvis en spiller ensidigt opsiger kontrakten, har betydet, at man forhindrer transfer ved kontraktens udløb og dermed omgår Bosman-dommen.
The practice of signing longer and longer contracts together with the FIFA ban on transfers in the event of the unilateral termination of contracts by players made it possible to avoid end-of-contract transfers and thus circumvent the Bosman ruling.
De principper, FIFA har baseret de nye transferregler på, som trådte i kraft den 1. september 2001, gør det muligt at komme denne situation til livs.
The principles on which FIFA based its new rules, in force since 1 September 2001, put an end to that situation.
Kommissionen mener, at de skaber ligevægt mellem på den ene side garantien for en styrkelse af uddannelsen, især i de små klubber, og på den anden side overholdelse af EU-retten.
In the Commission's opinion, they strike an even balance between the guarantee to encourage training, especially in small clubs, and compliance with Community law.
Kontrakter kan nu maksimalt indgås for en femårig periode.
Contracts now run for a maximum of five years.
Erstatning kan fortsat gives for uddannelse af spillere, hvis den står i forhold til de reelle uddannelsesomkostninger, selv hvis der er tale om transfer efter kontraktens udløb.
Training compensation can still be paid provided it is proportionate to the actual training costs incurred even in the case if end-of-contract transfers.
Det nye system, der indeholder bestemmelser om fordeling af erstatningen for spilleruddannelsen, skal især være til fordel for de små klubber, herunder amatørklubberne.
Small clubs, including amateur clubs, should be the main beneficiaries of the new system whereby part of the compensation is passed on (cascade system).
Ensidig opsigelse af kontrakter er mulig ved sæsonafslutningen.
Unilateral termination of contracts is now possible at the end of season.
Det kan medføre en rimelig økonomisk erstatning samt kortvarige sanktioner i kontraktperioden, som skal være afstemt efter målsætningen om at sikre holdenes stabilitet og en regelmæssig afvikling af turneringerne.
It can give rise to objective financial compensation and during protected periods, short-term sanctions proportionate to the objectives of ensuring the stability of teams and the regularity of competitions.
Det er altid muligt at opsige en kontrakt med gyldig grund eller med gyldig sportslig begrundelse.
Termination of a contract for a just cause or just sporting reasons is always possible.
Voldgift er frivillig og voldgiftsorganerne er paritære.
Arbitration is voluntary and dispute settlement bodies have joint membership.
Kommissionen finder, at hvis disse principper anvendes korrekt, bør de være tilstrækkelige til at undgå omgåelser af den type, det ærede medlem nævner, og som synes at have været udbredte inden vedtagelsen af de nye FIFA-regler.
The Commission believes that, if properly applied, these principles should be enough to end the type of practice referred to by the Honourable Member, which appears to have been frequent before FIFA adopted new rules.
Kommissionen mener, at forbundene er bedst i stand til at kategorisere klubberne efter objektive kriterier med henblik på at sikre, at de principper, der blev vedtaget på mødet den 5. marts 2001, overholdes nøje.
The Commission feels that sporting organisations are in the best position to establish a ranking of clubs in accordance with objective criteria designed to ensure strict compliance with the principles evolved at the meeting on 5 march 2001.
Kommissionen mener, at ændringen af de internationale transferregler på grundlag af på forhånd fastlagte principper har beskyttet den almene interesse og de individuelle frihedsrettigheder og samtidig taget hensyn til sportens særlige kendetegn.
The Commission is of the opinion that by amending the rules on international transfers of players on the basis of principles agreed beforehand has safeguarded general interest as well as individual freedom while having due regard for the specific features of the sport.
Almindelige domstole kan behandle enhver form for misbrug eller omgåelse af det nye system i de enkelte tilfælde.
Individual cases of abuse or circumvention of the new system can be referred to the ordinary courts.
2002/C 205 E/034
2002/C 205 E/034
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-3408/01
WRITTEN QUESTION P-3408/01
(5. december 2001)
(5 December 2001)
Om: Badger med antisemitiske paroler
Subject: Anti-semitic badges
Under en ferie på Kreta gik en borger fra min valgkreds, South West, ind i en forretning, hvor der solgtes forskellige badger med antisemitiske paroler.
During a holiday in Crete, one of my South-West constituents walked into a shop which had a range of anti-semitic badges on sale.
Er Kommissionen klar over, at der sælges sådanne badger med stødende paroler på Kreta?
Is the Commission aware that such offensive badges were being sold in Crete?
Agter Kommissionen i bekræftende fald at rette henvendelse til den græske regering for at rejse dette spørgsmål?
If so, will the Commission make representations to the Greek Government about this issue?
Race- og fremmedhad udgør en direkte overtrædelse af de principper om frihed, demokrati, respekt for menneskerettighederne og de grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder samt retsstatsprincippet, som Unionen bygger på, og som er fælles for medlemsstaterne som omhandlet i artikel 6 i traktaten om oprettelse af Den Europæiske Union.
Racism and xenophobia are a direct violation of the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the rule of law, principles upon which the Union is founded and which are common to the Member States as stated in Article 6 of the Treaty on the European Union.
Kommissionen har for nylig fremsat et forslag til en rammeafgørelse KOM(2001) 664 endelig udg. , et retligt instrument på det strafferetlige område.
The Commission has recently presented a proposal for a Framework Decision COM(2001) 664 final. , a legislative instrument in the field of penal law.
Formålet med rammeafgørelsen er dobbelt: for det første gælder det om at sikre, at den samme race- og fremmedhadsbetonede adfærd straffes ens i alle medlemsstater, og for det andet gælder det om at forbedre og fremme det retlige samarbejde ved at fjerne mulige hindringer.
The purpose of the Framework Decision is twofold: firstly, to ensure that the same racist and xenophobic conducts are punishable by the same penalties in all Member States and secondly, to improve and encourage judicial cooperation by removing potential obstacles.
Offentlige race- og fremmedhadsbetonede fornærmelser af enkeltpersoner eller grupper samt offentlig udbredelse af racistisk materiale af enhver art henhører under de former for adfærd, der vil være strafbare som kriminelle krænkelser i alle medlemsstater.
Public insults towards individuals or groups for a racist or xenophobic purpose, as well as public dissemination of racist material by any means are included among the behaviours to be punishable as criminal offences in all Member States.
2002/C 205 E/045
2002/C 205 E/045
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-3556/01
WRITTEN QUESTION P-3556/01
af Arlette Laguiller (GUE/NGL) til Kommissionen
by Arlette Laguiller (GUE/NGL) to the Commission
(4. januar 2002)
(4 January 2002)
Om: Eksplosion i en fyrværkerifabrik den 2. juni 2000 i Lanhelas i Portugal
Subject: Firework explosion in Lanhelas (Portugal) on 2 June 2000
Under spørgetiden den 5. juli 2000 lovede Wallström på Kommissionens vegne at behandle spørgsmålet om fyrværkerifabrikker og transport af farlige stoffer i Europa, og hun præciserede følgende: Et forslag til ændring af Seveso II-direktivet bør være parat i begyndelsen af næste år, det vil sige 2001.
At Question Time on 5 July 2000, Commissioner Wallström undertook, on behalf of the Commission, to examine the problem of fireworks and the transport of hazardous substances in the Community, and stated: A proposal for amendments to the Seveso II directive should be ready by the beginning of next year, that is 2001.
Det kan først gøres, når vi har evalueret erfaringerne efter ulykken i Enschede såvel som ulykken i Rumænien.
This can only be done when we have evaluated the experiences following the accident in Enschede as well as the accident in Romania.
Denne proces vil blive udført i snævert samarbejde med medlemsstaterne, Europa-Parlamentet og andre interesserede parter (svar på spørgsmål H-0548/00 ).
This process will be carried out in close cooperation with the Member States, the European Parliament and other interested parties. (answer to question H-0548/00 , tabled by the author of the present question).
Efter dette tidspunkt er der sket andre eksplosioner andre steder i Portugal: —
Since then, several other accidents have occurred in other localities in Portugal: —
forkert håndtering af fyrværkeri medførte den 16. april, påskedag, i nærheden af Ponte de Lima, at en person blev dræbt og flere såret, mens der skete store materielle skader; —
on Easter Monday, 16 April 2001, near Ponte de Lima, a bungled firework display killed one person and injured several others, as well as causing significant material damage; —
i juli 2001 medførte en eksplosion i en fyrværkerifabrik i nærheden af byen Taipas, at 5 ansatte i fabrikken blev dræbt, mens flere blev alvorligt såret; —
in July 2001, an explosion in a firework production unit near the town of Taipas killed five employees and left several other people with serious injuries; —
der er desuden sket andre ulykker i fyrværkerifabrikker siden dette tidspunkt, bl.a. i sommeren 2000, hvor en lystbåd blev antændt.
other firework-related accidents have included one in summer 2000 which led to a spectacular fire on a yacht (in this case, fortunately, there were no victims).
Hvad gør Kommissionen for at fastsætte bestemmelser om og sikre denne aktivitet såvel for arbejdstagerne i sektoren som for indbyggerne i de tilgrænsende områder?
What action is the Commission taking to tighten the rules and safety standards governing this activity, for both the workers who handle fireworks and those who live in the vicinity of firework displays?
Hvad gør Kommissionen for at sikre, at ofrene får en korrekt og hurtig erstatning?
What action is it taking to ensure that the victims are swiftly and properly compensated?
(24. januar 2002)
(24 January 2002)
Kommissionen vedtog den 10. december 2001 et forslag til ændring af Seveso II-direktivet KOM(2001) 624 endelig udg. .
On 10 December 2001 the Commission adopted a proposal to amend the Seveso II Directive COM(2001) 624 final. .
Dette forslag er det konkrete resultat af en intensiv samrådsprocedure, specielt for så vidt angår ændringsforslagene vedrørende eksplosiver.
This proposal was the outcome of intense consultation, particularly concerning proposals for amendments relating to explosives.
Efter Enschede-ulykken afholdt Kommissionen to seminarer om sprængstoffer og fyrværkeri.
Following the Enschede accident, the Commission organised two seminars on explosives and pyrotechnic substances.
Det første fandt sted i Marseille den 27. september 2000, det andet i Ispra i Det Fælles Forskningscenter den 28.-29. marts 2001.
The first took place in Marseille on 27 September 2000 and the second at the Commission's Joint Research Centre at Ispra on 28 and 29 March 2001.
Rapporterne fra disse seminarer findes på Internet-adressen for Kontoret for Større Risici: (http://mahbsrv.jrc.it).
The proceedings of these seminars are available on the Internet site of the Major Accident Hazards Bureau (http://mahbsrv.jrc.it).
Kommissionen afholdt ligeledes den 31. maj 2001 en offentlig høring i Bruxelles med henblik på at indhente synspunkter og kommentarer til et foreløbigt forslag til ændring af Seveso II-direktivet.
In addition, on 31 May 2001 the Commission held a public consultation meeting in Brussels in order to gather opinions and comments on a preliminary draft proposal to amend the Seveso II Directive.
Kommissionen skal erindre om, at dette forslag hovedsagelig sigter på at imødegå ulykker som dem i Baia Mare og Enschede samt at tage hensyn til den seneste videnskabelige forskning inden for kræftfremkaldende og miljøfarlige stoffer.
The Honourable Member will recall that this proposal was basically intended as a response to the Baia Mare and Enschede accidents and to take account of scientific progress on carcinogenic and environmentally hazardous substances.
Ved denne lejlighed var det foreløbige forslag samt konklusionerne fra de forskellige seminarer og arbejdsgrupper, der havde beskæftiget sig med disse spørgsmål, genstand for en offentlig debat.
At the meeting, the preliminary draft proposal and the conclusions of the different seminars and working groups that had been looking into these matters were put to open debate.
På baggrund af denne debat forekom det hensigtsmæssigt at udvide anvendelsesområdet for Seveso II-direktivet gennem en bedre definition af begrebet fyrværkeri og sprængstoffer og fastsættelse af lavere grænseværdier for bestemmelse af disse stoffer.
Following this discussion it was seen appropriate to broaden the scope of the Seveso II Directive by offering a better definition of pyrotechnic substances and explosives while lowering the qualifying quantities for these substances.
Konkret udtrykt er sigtet med ændringsforslaget navnlig at tilpasse kriterierne for klassificering, således at der bedre kan tages hensyn til den risiko, der er forbundet med visse stoffer anvendt til fyrværkeri.
Specifically, the draft amendment essentially seeks to adapt the classification criteria so as to take better account of the danger associated with certain pyrotechnic substances.
Såfremt ændringsforslaget godkendes af Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet, vil det blive muligt at opnå en betragtelig højnelse af sikkerhedsniveauet for såvel arbejdstagere som beboere i nabolaget mod de risici, som sådanne anlæg frembyder.
If it receives the backing of Parliament and the Council it will make possible an appreciable improvement in the safety of workers and people living near such dangerous sites.
For så vidt angår betaling af erstatning til ofrene, henleder Kommissionen det ærede medlems opmærksomhed på, at dette spørgsmål henhører under den nationale straffe- og civilret.
As regards compensation for victims, the Commission would remind the Honourable Member that this is a matter for national penal and civil law.
2002/C 205 E/046
2002/C 205 E/046
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-3564/01
WRITTEN QUESTION P-3564/01
I forbindelse med import af forarbejdet frisk fisk fra tredjelande kan det konstateres, at kontrollen med de mikrobiologiske standarder ved de forskellige grænsekontrolsteder varierer enormt fra et EU-land til et andet.
In the context of imports of treated fresh fish from third countries, it appears that there are enormous variations between EU Member States in the nature of the controls operated at the border inspection posts, as regards the microbiological standards required.
Dette forhold resulterer i, at de europæiske importører systematisk vælger at importere varer via de lufthavne i EU, hvor grænsekontrolstedernes fytosanitære krav er mindst strenge, hvorfra de så transporteres over land til det endelige bestemmelsessted.
As a result, EU importers are systematically choosing as their points of entry airports located in Member States where the health standards required at the border inspection posts are lower, and are then transporting the goods by land to their final destination.
Den endelige forbruger modtager følgelig varen i dårligere stand, fordi antallet af led i logistikkæden systematisk forøges med en deraf følgende forringelse af varens mikrobiologiske tilstand.
At their end, consumers are thus receiving the goods in worse condition: the systematic increasing of the number of links in the logistic chain leads to a deterioration in the microbiological condition of the goods.
Hvilke øjeblikkelige foranstaltninger vil der blive truffet for at bringe dette forhold til ophør?
What measures will be taken to put an immediate end to this situation?