natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvis disse levnedsmidler, som er meget traditionelle og af fortræffelig kvalitet og anerkendes som sådanne på det internationale marked, ikke tildeles de beskyttede oprindelsesbetegnelser, der er ansøgt om, vil de blive efterlignet én for én, hvilket vil ødelægge deres omdømme og Ungarns positive image.
In the absence of the protected designations of origin which have been applied for, these foodstuffs, which are highly traditional and of excellent quality, and recognised on the international market as being so, are, one by one, being counterfeited, destroying their reputation and Hungary's favourable image.
Hvor langt er man nået med registreringen af disse oprindelsesbetegnelser?
What progress has been made with the registration of these designations of origin?
Hvorfor er behandlingen af ansøgningen blevet så forsinket?
Why has the assessment of the application been so delayed?
Hvordan vil Kommissionen afbøde eventuelle skader som følge af forsinkelsen?
How will the Commission mitigate any damage caused by the delay?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2006/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2006/06
Postvæsenet begrunder forhøjelsen med »øgede omkostninger på eksportområdet«.
The reason which it gave was that export costs had risen.
Postvæsenerne i andre medlemsstater har ikke foretaget nogen portoforhøjelse, og her er portoen for standardbreve til det europæiske udland i sammenligning væsentligt lavere.
Postal companies in other Member States did not increase their postage rates, and they are charging significantly less postage on standard letters to other European countries than the German post office does.
Til sammenligning anføres portoen i andre EU-­medlemsstater for et standardbrev til forsendelse inden for Europa:
By way of comparison, the charges for sending a standard letter to destinations within Europe in certain other EU Member States are as follows:
Frankrig: indtil 20 g: 0,55 EUR
France (up to 20g): EUR 0.55;
Østrig: indtil 20 g: 0,55 EUR
Austria (up to 20g): EUR 0.55;
Nederlandene indtil 20 g: 0,65 EUR (prioriteret), 0,61 EUR (ikke-prioriteret)
Netherlands (up to 20g): EUR 0.65 (1st class), EUR 0.61 (2nd class);
Belgien: indtil 50 g: 0,70 EUR (prioriteret), 0,60 EUR (ikke-prioriteret)
Belgium (up to 50g): EUR 0.70 (1st class), EUR 0.60 (2nd class);
Spanien: indtil 20 g: 0,53 EUR
Spain (up to 20g): EUR 0.53.
Mener Kommissionen, at en sådan drastisk portoforhøjelse fra Deutsche Post AG's side, som sammenlignet med portoen i andre EU-­medlemsstater ligger tydeligt over det europæiske gennemsnit, er forenelig med princippet om et fælles indre marked?
Is the drastic rise in the postage rate introduced by Deutsche Post AG, which takes the rate well above the European average (i.e. the average in other EU Member States), compatible with the idea of a single market in Europe?
Mener Kommissionen, at beskyttelsen af de europæiske forbrugere er sikret på baggrund af så drastiske forskelle inden for EU?
In the light of such stark disparities within Europe, to what extent does the Commission believe that European consumers' interests are protected?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2007/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2007/06
Om: Gennemførelse af »Plan D for demokrati, dialog og debat« og status over indsamlingen af feedback
Subject: Implementation of ‘Plan D for democracy, dialogue and debate’ and feedback received to date
Gennem en meddelelse fra den østrigske udenrigsminister Ursula Plassnick har det østrigske EU-­formandskab indkaldt til et uformelt møde den 27. og 28. maj mellem udenrigsministrene for at diskutere forfatningstraktatens fremtid.
Through a communiqué from Foreign Minister Ursula Plassnick, the Austrian Presidency of the EU has announced that an informal Foreign Ministers’ meeting will be held on 27 and 28 May to discuss the future of the Constitution.
Med offentliggørelsen af »Plan D for demokrati, dialog og debat«, i oktober 2005 meddelte Kommissionen sin strategi under »tænkepausen«, der har til formål at involvere borgerne i debatten om EU's og forfatningstraktatens fremtid.
In October 2005 the Commission announced its own line of action during the ‘reflection period’ by publishing ‘Plan D for democracy, dialogue and debate’, aimed at involving ordinary citizens in discussions on the future of the EU and the Constitution.
Medlemsstaternes sammenfatning og forelæggelse af resultaterne af de nationale debatter er yderst vigtig.
The gathering of synthesis reports by Member States, based on the presentation of the results of national debates, is a vitally important process.
De første resultater forventedes forelagt i april og skulle gøre det muligt at drage den første række af konklusioner.
The initial feedback, aimed to drawing a first set of conclusions, was scheduled for April.
Efter det negative udfald af folkeafstemningerne om ratifikation af forfatningstraktaten i Frankrig og Nederlandene er det strengt nødvendigt at genoprette offentlighedens tillid til EU og være opmærksom på de behov, som civilsamfundet, arbejdsmarkedets parter og de nationale parlamenter foruden de traditionelle parter i sagen har.
Following the ‘no’ vote in the French and Dutch ratification referendums, it is essential to restore people's trust in the European Union and to take due account of the desires of civil society, the social parties and national parliaments, in addition to those traditionally associated with such matters.
Kan Rådet oplyse, hvor mange og hvilke medlemsstater der har forelagt den første række af konklusioner fra de nationale debatter for Kommissionen og formandskabet, sådan som Plan D foreskriver?
Will the Council state how many Member States have submitted to the Commission and the Council Presidency the first set of conclusions drawn from the national debates forming part of Plan D, and will it specify which Member States have done so?
Kan Rådet oplyse, i hvilket omfang samlingen af feedback kan anvendes under det møde, som det østrigske EU-formandskab har indkaldt til den 27. og 28. maj?
Will the Council state to what extent it will be possible to use this feedback during the meeting announced by the Austrian Presidency of the EU for 27 and 28 May?
Som svar på det ærede parlamentsmedlems forespørgsel vil Rådet gerne henvise til den evalueringsrapport, som Rådet har udarbejdet om medlemsstaternes initiativer i tænkepausen som gengivet i 9701/­1/­06 REV 1 9701/1/REV 1: Rapport om medlemsstaternes informations- og kommunikationsaktiviteter i tænkepause.(http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st09/st09701-re01.en06.pdf) og del I i formandskabets konklusioner fra mødet i Det Europæiske Råd den 15.-­16. juni 2006 10633/06: Mødet i Det Europæiske Råd den 15.-­16. juni 2006 i Bruxelles — formandskabets konklusioner.(http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st10/st10633.en06.pdf) .
In reply to the question put by the Honourable Member, the Council would refer to the evaluation report by the Council on the initiatives undertaken by Member States during the reflection period as set out in 9701/1/06 REV 1 9701/1/REV 1: Report on Member States' information and communication activities during the reflection period (http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st09/st09701-re01.en06.pdf). and to Part I of the Presidency Conclusions following the European Council of 15 and 16 June 2006 10633/06: Brussels European Council 15/16 June 2006 — Presidency Conclusions (http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st10/st10633.en06.pdf). .
Rådet vil gerne påpege, at evalueringsrapporten i 9701/­1/­06 REV 1 bygger på besvarelser fra alle EU-­medlemsstater af et spørgeskema, som formandskabet udsendte den 9. februar 2006 6199/06: Evalueringsrapport om medlemsstaternes aktiviteter i tænkepausen — spørgeskema(http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st06/st06199.en06.pdf) .
The Council would point out that the evaluation report contained in 9701/1/06 REV 1 is based on replies received from all EU Member States to a questionnaire issued by the Presidency on 9 February 2006 6199/06: Evaluation report on Member States' activities during the reflection period — questionnaire (http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st06/st06199.en06.pdf). .
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2015/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2015/06
Om: Traditionelle idrætsformer og den europæiske kulturarv
Subject: Traditional sports, part of Europe's cultural heritage
År 2004 var europæisk år for uddannelse gennem idræt.
2004 was the European Year of Education through Sport.
Kommissionen understregede i alle de initiativer, som den iværksatte, idrættens social-pædagogiske værdi og påpegede den gavnlige indvirkning, som udøvelsen heraf har på den fysiske form.
In each of its initiatives to mark the occasion, the Commission stressed the great social and educational value of sport and pointed out its beneficial effects on the physical fitness of those who took part.
Kan Kommissionen set i lyset af idrætsaktiviteters opdragende betydning, deres ubestridte evne til at formidle værdier, der er nødvendige for en åben og tolerant sameksistens, regionale og traditionelle spils mulighed for at understrege Europas historiske og kulturelle forskellighed og samtidig befordre den integration, der kræves for at gennemføre det europæiske medborgerskab, oplyse: —
Given the educational value of sport, its undoubted suitability for imparting values essential for open, tolerant coexistence, and the fact that traditional regional games could be used to emphasise Europe’s historical cultural diversity as well as to achieve the integration needed to bring about European citizenship, does the Commission not believe that: —
om den ikke mener, at de regionale og traditionelle spil bør tilkendes en kulturel værdi, som er vigtigere end deres turistmæssige værdi? —
traditional regional games should be considered to have a cultural value over and above their usefulness to tourism; —
om den ikke mener, at disse underholdningsformer bør bevares, at der bør spredes information om dem, og at de bør opretholdes som en del af den fælles kulturarv? —
these forms of entertainment should be preserved, publicised, and handed down as a common heritage; —
om den ikke mener, at også forskningen i de folkelige traditioner, som ligger til grund for disse kunstneriske udtryksformer (sport, dans, musik, dragter), bør opprioriteres?
it should in some way also exploit the research into the popular traditions underlying different forms of artistic expression such as sport, dance, music, or costumes?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2027/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2027/06
Om: Trussel mod den musikalske mangfoldighed i Europa
Subject: Threat to musical diversity in Europe
To skrivelser fra Kommissionen kan betyde væsentlige ændringer af den måde, hvorpå ophavsrettigheder på musikområdet håndteres.
Two Commission documents could lead to major changes in the protection of musical copyright.
Af den første skrivelse fremgår det, at forvaltningsselskaberne bør ændre vilkårene for at opnå licens, hvad angår musik, der lægges ud på internettet.
The first states that copyright societies should reform licensing procedures in relation to the distribution of music over the Internet.
Kommissionen mener, at der højst bør være to eller tre forvaltningsselskaber for musiklicenser i hele Europa.
The Commission would prefer it if a maximum of two or three copyright societies granted licences for the whole of Europe.
Samtidig påpeges det, at selskaberne ikke bør afsætte nogen midler til at støtte deres egne landes musik.
At the same time it is stated that the societies must not earmark any funds for support of their own country's music.
Den anden skrivelse omhandler såvel digital spredning som radio/­TV og mekaniske licenser (produktion af cd'er og film).
The second document concerns both digital radio and TV broadcasting and mechanical licensing (production of disks and films).
EU ønsker nu at ændre disse aftaler, således at et selskab kan uddele musiklicenser i hele Europa.
The EU now wishes these agreements to be altered so that a society can license the use of music throughout Europe.
Selskaberne i de små lande kommer til at fungere som en form for lokale agenter for de store tyske, franske og britiske selskaber.
Small countries' societies would become a kind of local agent for the large German, French or British societies.
Der er stor frygt for at disse forslag vil underminere mangfoldigheden i fremstillingen af musik i hele Europa.
There are serious misgivings that these proposals may undermine the diversity of musical creation in the whole of Europe.
Samtidig er der voldsomme protester over, at ophavsmændene aldrig selv er blevet hørt af Kommissionen i denne proces.
At the same time, the fact is strongly criticised that the Commission has never consulted authors themselves during this process.
På baggrund af ovenstående hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen så til hensigt at træffe, hvad angår den omtalte kritik?
In view of this situation, what is the Commission's response to the criticisms and concerns expressed?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2032/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2032/06
Om: Den byggetekniske tilstand af Jean Monnet-Bygningen i Luxembourg
Subject: State of repair of the Jean Monnet building in Luxembourg
Der verserer gang på gang rygter om, at der ikke foreligger nogen gyldig ibrugtagningstilladelse for Jean Monnet-Bygningen i Luxembourg.
There are repeated rumours that the JMO building in Luxembourg has no valid building regulations approval.
Bygningen, der stammer fra begyndelsen af 70'erne, betegnes ofte som slidt og undertiden også som sundhedsfarlig.
The building, which dates from the early 1970s, is often described as shabby and as a risk to health.
Allerede i 1997 forlød det, at der var planer om snart at flytte de ansatte, fordi bygningen skulle rives ned eller renoveres fra bunden, men ifølge de nyeste planer skal flytningen først finde sted i 2012.
Back in 1997 there were plans for staff to vacate the building in the near future so that it could be demolished or renovated, but this move is now not planned until 2012.
Hovedklagepunkterne vedrører de anvendte materialer (asbest, glasuld) og brandsikringen.
The most important complaints relate to the materials used in the building (asbestos, glass fibre wool) and fire protection.
Kommissionen har ladet bygningen kontrollere for asbest, og det fremgik af undersøgelsesrapporten, at der kunne påvises asbest, men kun i bunden (ikke sundhedsskadelig) form, så længe skillevæggene forblev på plads.
The Commission has had the JMO building examined for asbestos and the expert opinion showed that, although asbestos is to be found, it is only in the form of bound asbestos which is not dangerous as long as the partition walls remain intact.
Ifølge mine oplysninger påbegyndte man imidlertid før julen 2005 en større ombygning, hvor også skillevægge blev nedrevet og til dels genopbygget, og nu forlyder det pludselig, at bygningen er fri for enhver form for asbest.
According to information that I have received, however, before Christmas 2005 work started on major conversion work which included the demolition and partial rebuilding of partition walls and suddenly the building was said to be free of any asbestos whatsoever.
Også brandsikringen skulle være problematisk.
There are apparently also problems in relation to fire protection.
I en undersøgelsesrapport af 24.7.2001 fra firmaet GESTEC påpeges forskellige mangler ved brandsikringen, som er blevet bekræftet i en anden uafhængig rapport fra diplomingeniøren, Paul Corall (2.3.2006).
A report dated 24 July 2001 setting out the findings of a study by the firm Gestec highlighted various shortcomings in fire protection, which were confirmed by a further independent opinion from the engineer Paul Corall on 2 March 2006.
Foreligger der en gyldig ibrugtagningstilladelse for Jean Monnet-Bygningen?
Does the JMO building have valid building regulations approval?
Er der anvendt asbestholdige materialer eller kræftfremkaldende glasuld i bygningen?
Were materials containing asbestos or carcinogenic glass fibre wool used in the building?
Er bygningen på grund af sin alder og tilstand og de anvendte materialer på nogen måde til fare for de deri beskæftigede personers sundhed og sikkerhed?
In view of the building's age, state of repair and the materials used, is there any risk to the health and safety of the staff working in it?
Hvornår vil de mangler, der blev påpeget i undersøgelsesrapporten fra firmaet GESTEC, blive afhjulpet?
When will the shortcomings identified in the Gestec report be dealt with?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2033/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2033/06
af Justas Paleckis (PSE)
by Justas Paleckis (PSE)
Om: Kommissionens tiltag med henblik på at sikre lige konkurrencevilkår
Subject: Action by the European Commission to ensure uniform conditions of competition
Europa-Parlamentet finder, at det grundlæggende problem med handelen med Kina er det forhold, at Kina ikke er en markedsøkonomi.
As the European Parliament has recognised, the fact that China is not a market economy poses a fundamental problem in terms of trade with that country.
Flertallet af Kinas eksportvirksomheder modtager rentefri lån og permanent eksportstøtte samt skjult statsstøtte, bl.a. i form af gratis elektricitet.
The majority of China’s export businesses receive interest-free loans from state banks and permanent export subsidies, as well as other hidden forms of state aid such as free provision of electricity.
Flertallet af de kinesiske industrivirksomheder overholder ikke internationale bestemmelser om social beskyttelse af arbejderne og miljøbeskyttelse.
Most of China’s industrial concerns do not fulfil the international requirements adopted by China on environmental protection or on workers’ social welfare.
Hvad vil Kommissionen gøre for at kræve, at EU's handelspartnere fuldt ud opfylder de forpligtelser, de navnlig har indgået inden for rammerne af WTO på områderne for internationale normer for markedsøkonomi samt miljø- og socialbeskyttelse, og for at kontrollere, at disse forpligtelser overholdes?
What action does the Commission intend to take in order to ensure that the EU’s trading partners adhere strictly to their direct obligations, and to those made in the context of WTO agreements, in the area of requirements on international standards relating to the market economy, social welfare and environmental protection, and to monitor whether these are being applied?
Hvad kan Kommissionen gøre for at forkorte og effektivisere undersøgelsesproceduren i dumpingsagerne?
What can the Commission do to speed up the procedure for investigating cases of dumping and to make this procedure more efficient?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2034/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2034/06
Mener Kommissionen, at den har opfyldt alle hovedkrav fra MEP'ernes side i det reviderede forslag om tjenesteydelser, som blev offentliggjort den 4. april 2006, eller er nogle af disse krav fortsat uafklarede?
Does the Commission believe that it has met all of the key demands from MEPs in the revised proposal on services published on 4 April 2006, or does the Commission consider that there are some key points still to be addressed?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2047/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2047/06
Når henses til, at ca. 10 % af Grækenlands befolkning og 14,5 % af de øvrige europæiske landes befolkninger er personer med handicap, er der imidlertid en klar risiko for, at der bliver skabt nye former for social isolation.
However, as approximately 10 % of the population of Greece and 14.5 % in the other European countries are people with disabilities, it is becoming clear that there is a risk of creating new forms of social exclusion.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2048/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2048/06
Om: Anlæg af to motorveje på Ibiza (Spanien)
Subject: Building of two motorways on Ibiza
Man er på øen Ibiza (Balearerne) ved at gennemføre et motorvejsprojekt, som er iværksat og finansieret af Balearernes regionalregering sammen med ørådet for Ibiza og Formentera.
On the island of Ibiza (Baleares, Spain), a motorway construction scheme developed and funded by the Government of the Balearic Islands in conjunction with the Island Council of Ibiza and Formentera is meeting with deep-felt rejection from local society, due to its unjustifiability, irrationality and entirely inappropriate scale.
Projektet indvirker direkte på to lokaliteter af fællesskabsbetydning (LAF), hvoraf en også har status af særligt fuglebeskyttelsesområde: naturreservatet Sa Serra Grossa og naturparken Ses Salines.
It directly affects two sites of Community interest, one of which is also a registered bird protection area: the Sa Serra Grossa area of particular natural interest, and the Ses Salines Natural Park and Reserve.
I disse områder omfatter projektet omledning af fire vandløb gennem store betonkanaler, der løber gennem naturparken og leder vandet ud i vådområdet ved Sal Rossa, der nyder særlig beskyttelse som Ramsarområde.
In these protected areas, the scheme involves rerouting four streams by means of large-scale concrete channels running through the natural park to bring the water into the Sal Rossa ponds within the protected area, which is a registered Ramsar area.
Også udkanten af dette område er berørt, fordi en del af motorvejsstrækningen er ved at blive anlagt her.
The outer portion of the protected area will also be affected due to the building of the section of motorway that runs along its edge.
Inden for stødpudezonen i parkens udkant bliver der smidt jord og affald fra motorvejsbyggeriet uden forudgående sortering eller behandling med henblik på at fylde et marskområde op, hvor der efter planen skal ligge en golfbane.
Within the park's outermost protected precinct, earth and other rubbish from the building work is being dumped, without being classified or treated, in order to fill in a marsh area intended for a golf course project.
Projektet berører også vandressourcerne i det beskyttede område og udgør en alvorlig trussel mod grundvandet, fordi de udgravninger, som indgår i projektet, vil medføre forurening af vandet.
The project affects the protected area’s hydrographic network, seriously changing the underground hydrological system and hitting the aquifers themselves thanks to the amount of earth moving work required by the project, resulting in the contamination of the water concerned.
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter den i sin egenskab af traktaternes vogter at træffe for at sikre overholdelsen af fællesskabsretten i denne sag?
What measures does the Commission intend to take, as the guarantor of the Treaties, to ensure that Community law is complied with?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-2049/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2049/06
Om: Festival for børne- og ungdomslitteratur i Salamiyeh (Syrien)
Subject: Salamiyeh Young People's Literary Festival (Syria)
Under den nylige festival for børne- og ungdomslitteratur i Salamiyeh (Syrien) klagede en deltager til myndighederne over, at der var blevet læst højt af et digt, som kritiserede Gud for at tillade fattigdom og undertrykkelse i verden.
During the recent Young People's Literary Festival in Salamiyeh, Syria, one of those attending complained to the authorities that a poem making God responsible for poverty and oppression throughout the world had been read.
Til almindelig overraskelse — fordi Syrien officielt er et verdsligt land — tog myndighederne klagen til følge og straffede lederne af det kulturcenter, der lagde lokaler til festivalen.
To general surprise, given that Syria claims to be a secular state, the authorities act on the complaint and punished those in charge of the cultural centre where the event was held.
Det ser ud til, at den syriske regering har allieret sig med de islamiske fundamentalister med henblik på at bremse den voksende demokratiske opposition i landet.
It seems clear that the Syrian Government is consciously allying itself with Islamic fundamentalists, in order to create barriers to the growing democratic opposition within the country.
Et vidnesbyrd herom er åbningen af et sharia-fakultet på universitetet i Alepo, tilladelsen til etablering af tre islamiske banker og åbningen af moskeerne uden for de tidspunkter, hvor der kaldes til bøn.
We can instance the opening of a Faculty of Sharia in the University of Alepo, the authorisation of three Islamic banks, and the opening of mosques outwith times of prayer.