natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Som følge heraf kunne man ikke længere sikre en fuldstændig kølevandsforsyning af reaktoren, og indikatorer og regulatorer svigtede.
As a consequence there was a shortfall in the supply of water coolant to the reactor, and a number of display units and regulators failed.
Det tekniske mandskab havde i mere end 20 minutter ikke fuldstændig kontrol over reaktoren.
For more than 20 minutes the operating team did not have the reactor fully under control.
Hvis situation omkring uheldet havde udviklet sig i negativ retning, kunne der være indtrådt en kernesmeltning.
If the incident had continued to worsen, a core meltdown might have occurred.
Hvorledes udviklede situationen omkring uheldet sig helt nøjagtig ifølge Kommissionen?
What, to the Commission’s knowledge, exactly happened during this incident?
Mener den, at årsagerne til uheldets opståen og forløb er blevet tilstrækkeligt klarlagt?
Does it consider that the causes for the incident and the sequence of events have been adequately cleared up?
Kender Kommissionen grundene til, at to ud af fire redundanssystemer for nødforsyningen holder op med at fungere samtidigt, og hvorfor de to andre ikke også holdt op med at fungere?
Does the Commission know why two of the four redundant emergency power supply systems failed simultaneously for the same reason, and why the other two did not also fail?
Hvilke ville have været de mest vidtrækkende følger ifølge Kommissionen, hvis en eller to af de øvrige systemer var holdt op med at fungere?
What, in the Commission’s opinion, could have been the most serious consequence if one or both of the other two systems had failed?
Kan man på grund af de forskellige reaktortypers sikkerhedssystemer og konstruktion i medlemsstaterne efter Kommissionens opfattelse principielt udelukke de såkaldte »common cause failures« (dvs. at flere komponenter holder op med at fungere af samme årsag) ved nødforsyningen?
Does the Commission consider it possible, by means of safety systems and the configuration of the various reactor types in the Member States, for common cause failures (failure of several components for the same cause) in emergency power supply to be completely ruled out?
I benægtende fald, hvilke skridt foreslår Kommissionen med henblik på at forbedre sikkerhedsniveauet?
If not, what steps does the Commission propose to improve the safety level?
Hvad er efter Kommissionens opfattelse grundene til, at de to endnu operative redundanssystemer i Forsmark ikke var tilstrækkelige til at sørge for nødforsyningen og sikre en fuldstændig afkøling af reaktorerne, selv om de egentlig er konstrueret til at dække behovet 100 %?
To the Commission’s knowledge, why were the two redundant emergency power and reactor cooling systems which remained operational in Forsmark not sufficient, even though they are intended to provide 100 % backup?
Har Kommissionen kendskab til, hvilke sikkerhedstekniske grunde der i Forsmark I har ligget til grund for operatørernes valg i 1992 af konstruktionsmåden for nødforsyningssystemet (f.eks. forsyning via vekselrettere), og hvilke atomkraftværker i EU's medlemsstater der råder over et tilsvarende nødforsyningssystem (for så vidt angår jævn/­vekselstrømsforsyning, batteri- og dieselgeneratorkobling og komponenttyper)?
Is the Commission aware what reasons of a safety technology nature led the operator in 1992 to opt for the configuration of the emergency power system in Forsmark I (e.g. supply through inverters) and what nuclear power plants in EU Member States possess a similar emergency power system (as regards DC/AC power supply, interconnection of batteries and diesel generators and component types)?
Er Kommissionen i besiddelse af informationer om nødforsynings- og nødkølingssystemets tilstand i atomkraftværket Brunsbüttel i Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland?
Does the Commission have any information on the state of the emergency power and emergency cooling system in the nuclear power plant at Brunsbüttel in Germany?
Deler Kommissionen (det tyske forbundsmiljøministeriums) opfattelse, at uheldets forløb i Forsmark, som hidtil ikke har været genstand for sikkerhedsanalyser, viser, at det ikke i tilstrækkelig grad er muligt for mennesker at forstå de komplekse forhold forbundet med atomenergiudnyttelse, og også tydeliggør de systembetingede risici?
Does the Commission agree with the statement (by the German Ministry of the Environment) that the sequence of events in the incident in Forsmark, which has not yet been fully clarified by safety investigations, highlights the degree to which human understanding is unable to adequately grasp the complexity and inherent risks of nuclear energy?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4114/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4114/06
Ifølge oplysninger, som jeg har modtaget fra Christian Solidarity Worldwide, er der blevet indberettet 30 tilfælde af vold mod kristne i Sri Lanka i de første fem måneder i år.
According to information received by Christian Solidarity Worldwide there were 30 reported incidents of violence against Christians in Sri Lanka in the first five months of this year.
Disse episoder omfatter brandstiftelse, overfald og ødelæggelse af hjem og kirker.
These incidents included arson, assault and the destruction of homes and church buildings.
Religionsfriheden trues også af en lovgivning mod konvertering, der i øjeblikket bliver behandlet i det srilankanske parlament, og som tidligere er blevet erklæret forfatningsstridig af Sri Lankas øverste retsinstans.
Religious freedom is also being threatened by an anti-conversion bill currently passing through the Sri Lankan Parliament, which had previously been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka.
Har Kommissionen haft generelle drøftelser med de srilankanske myndigheder, og er disse spørgsmål blevet rejst?
Has the Commission had general discussions with the Sri Lankan authorities recently and have these matters been raised?
Er der nogen planer om at drøfte disse spørgsmål I fremtiden?
Are there plans to discuss these matters in the future?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4115/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4115/06
Om: Børn i Rumænien
Subject: Children in Romania
En nyhedsudsendelse udsendt af ITV i Det Forenede Kongerige i begyndelsen af september har skabt bekymring blandt mine vælgere.
A news report aired by ITV News in the UK at the beginning of September has caused concern among a number of my constituents.
Udsendelsen omhandler den påståede mishandling af forladte børn på hospitaler og børnehjem i Rumænien.
The report focuses on the alleged maltreatment of abandoned children in hospitals and orphanages in Romania.
Kan Kommissionen venligst oplyse, hvor udbredt denne situation er, og hvad der gøres for at afhjælpe dette problem inden Rumæniens planlagte tiltrædelse af EU til januar næste år.
Would the Commission please clarify how common this situation is and what is being done to rectify this situation ahead of Romania’s planned accession to the EU in January next year?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4132/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4132/06
Den britiske regering har endnu ikke besluttet, om britiske brevdueejere vil få tilladelse til at konkurrere i et internationalt brevdueløb i Frankrig.
The UK Government has yet to decide whether or not British pigeon fanciers will be allowed to compete in an international pigeon racing event in France.
Alle andre medlemsstaters regeringer i Den Europæiske Union har givet tilladelse.
All other Member States of the European Union have been given permission by their respective governments.
Finder Kommissionen, at der er nogen grund til, navnlig hvad angår risikoen for spredning af fugleinfluenza, at britiske deltagere i brevdueløb ikke bør have tilladelse til at deltage i denne internationale begivenhed?
Does the Commission believe that there is any reason, in particular relating to fears of spreading avian flu, for the UK's pigeon racers not to be permitted to participate in this international event?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4138/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4138/06
Om: Bogen »We feed the world«
Subject: The book We Feed The World
Filmen og bogen »We feed the world« udløser i øjeblikket hos mange mennesker irritation over den europæiske landbrugspolitik.
The film and book We Feed The World is currently provoking annoyance among many people regarding Europe's agricultural policy.
Hvilken generel holdning har Den Europæiske Union til påstandene i filmen og bogen »We feed the world«, og mere konkret til initiativet »Keine Chicken schicken« fra organisationen »Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst«?
What is the Union's overall view of the claims made in the film and book We Feed The World and what is its specific view of the ‘Keine Chicken schicken’ initiative of the German church organisation, the EED (Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst)?
Baggrundsinformation til bogen findes på Google med titlen »We Feed The World« in Google eller på www.eed.de.
Background information can be found by entering ‘We Feed The World’ in Google or by consulting the site www.eed.de.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4139/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4139/06
Om: Oprettelse af et europæisk sportsagentur
Subject: Establishment of a European Agency for Sport
Den nuværende generelle uheldige udvikling inden for sport — navnlig inden for fodbold — går ud over de nationale grænser og kræver derfor løsninger på europæisk plan.
Current abuses in sport in general — and football in particular — go beyond national boundaries and therefore call for European solutions.
Traktaten om en forfatning for Europa blev ikke vedtaget, og det er ikke tilstrækkeligt med en erklæring i Nice-traktaten for at kunne handle.
The European Constitution has not been adopted, and the Nice Declaration does not provide a sufficient basis for action.
I mellemtiden hober affærerne sig op.
Meanwhile, the number of scandals is on the increase.
Hvilke nuværende og mulige mekanismer findes der for at opnå en bedre kontrol med de finansielle og kommercielle aktiviteter, som finder sted inden for sporten i Den Europæiske Union?
What arrangements currently exist and might possibly be used to improve the monitoring of sport-related financial and commercial activities in the European Union?
I hvilket omfang vil det være muligt at oprette et europæisk sportsagentur, som bygger på modellen for andre agenturer for bedre at kontrollere den nuværende uheldige udvikling inden for sport — og navnlig inden for fodbold — på vort kontinent?
To what extent would it be possible to establish a European Agency for Sport along the lines of other agencies, so that the abuses we are seeing today in sport — and especially football — can be better monitored in Europe?
Ville indførelsen af en europæisk juridisk status for sportssammenslutninger være et tilstrækkeligt retsgrundlag for at oprette et sådant agentur?
Could establishing a European legal status for sports associations provide an adequate legal basis for the creation of such an agency?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4140/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4140/06
af Zsolt Becsey (PPE-DE)
by Zsolt Becsey (PPE‑DE)
Om: Kommissær Almunias rolle i bedømmelsen af Ungarns konvergenssituation
Subject: Role of Commissioner Almunia in the evaluation of Hungary's convergence situation
I forbindelse med den ungarske indenrigspolitiske skandale, der var udbrudt den 17. september, bekendtgjordes følgende erklæring fra finansminister János Veres:»… på de internationale finansmarkeder har det siden sidste sommer heddet sig, at det ved at lægge politisk pres på forskellige instanser havde været muligt ved en telefonopringning fra Feri (Ferenz Gyurcsány), at sikre, at Almunia og hans kolleger til trods for, hvad vi beklageligvis har fået at vide adskillige gange, ville give os mulighed for at fuldende konvergensprogrammet inden 1. september …«.
Commissioner, the following statement by János Veres, the Hungarian Finance Minister, was made public in connection with the internal political scandal which broke out in Hungary on 17 September 2006: ‘… on the international financial markets, basically since last summer, we were given to understand that by putting political pressure here and there it had been possible to arrange, by a phone call from Feri [PM Ferenc Gyurcsány], that Mr Almunia and his colleagues, in spite of what we have regrettably heard and been told many times, that in spite of this they would give us the chance to complete the convergence programme by 1 September …’.
Mener De i lyset af ovenstående, at det vil være foreneligt med Deres mandat som Kommissær, at De på baggrund af den interne ungarske politiske tidsplan (valget i foråret 2006) har givet efter for politisk pres fra en medlemsstats regering (i dette tilfælde det socialliberale ungarske kabinet) ved, at De og Deres kolleger i modstrid med Deres negative ekspertbedømmelse, som de gentagne gange — dog ikke officielt — har givet udtryk for, gav Gyurcsány-regeringen en forlænget frist på 8 måneder til på acceptabel vis at føre det ungarske konvergensprogram ajour, og at De derved udover den fire måneders periode, der ellers er almindelig ved denne procedure, har gjort denne regering en politisk tjeneste på bekostning af Fællesskabets økonomiske interesser og således undergravet troværdigheden af de konvergensbestræbelser, som De officielt er ansvarlig for?
In the light of the above, do you consider it compatible with your mandate as Commissioner that, taking account of the Hungarian internal political timetable (the spring 2006 general elections), you bowed to political pressure from a Member State government (in this case the Social-Liberal Hungarian cabinet) in that you and your colleagues, contrary to your repeatedly, but not publicly expressed negative expert opinion, gave the Gyurcsány government an eight-month extension to bring about an acceptable update to the Hungarian convergence programme, and that departing from the four-month period customary for such procedures you did a political favour to that government at the expense of the Community’s economic interests, thus undermining the credibility of that convergence effort for which you are officially responsible?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4146/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4146/06
Om: Evaluering af fremskridtene i forhold til anvendelsen af GSP plus-arrangementet
Subject: Assessment of progress and implementation of GSP-Plus
Det er netop blevet meddelt, at EL Salvador den 6. september 2006 deponerede ratifikationsdokumenterne vedrørende konvention 87 og 98 hos ILO i Genève.
We have recently been informed that, on 6 September 2006, El Salvador deposited the instruments of ratification in respect of Conventions 87 and 98 with the ILO in Geneva.
Hvad mener Kommissionen om dette forhold?
What assessment can be made of this?
Hvorledes påtænker Kommissionen at fortsætte med at støtte den reelle gennemførelse af disse konventioner i El Salvador og i de øvrige lande, der er omfattet af GSP plus-arrangementet?
How does the Commission intend to continue supporting the effective implementation of these conventions in El Salvador and other GSP-Plus beneficiary countries?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4152/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4152/06
Om: Betaling af de sidste rater i forbindelse med projektet Intemigra under INTERREG II C,
Subject: Final payment for Interreg II C, Intemigra project
Projektet Intemigra, som er en del af programmet INTERREG II C, blev afsluttet den 30. september 2001.
The Intemigra project — which is part of the Interreg II C programme — finished on 30.9.2001.
Kommissionen har ikke udbetalt det fulde beløb til det tyske forbundsministerium i forbindelse med projektet.
The Commission has not paid the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs in Germany the full amounts owed for the Intemigra project.
De tyske partnere i projektet har i fire år siden projektets afslutning ventet på betaling af de sidste rater fra Generaldirektoratet for Regionalpolitik.
So, four years after the lifetime of the project, German project partners are still waiting for the final payments from the Directorate-General for Regional Policy.
Hvad er grundene til, at Kommissionen ikke har udbetalt de sidste rater i forbindelse med projektet Intemigra til de berettigede betalingsmodtagere i Tyskland?
What are the reasons for the final instalments for the Intemigra projects not being paid by the Commission to the project partners who are entitled to them in Germany?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4153/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4153/06
Om: Konkurrenceforvridning i den græske banksektor
Subject: Distortion of competition in the Greek banking sector
Låneomkostningerne i Grækenland er højere end gennemsnittet i euro-området (forskellen er på mellem 0,3 % og 2,63 %).
The cost of loans in Greece exceeds the eurozone average (interest rates being between 0.3 % and 2.63 % higher).
Hvad mener Kommissionen om dette spørgsmål?
What view does the Commission take of this?
Mener Kommissionen, at konkurrencen inden for den græske banksektor fungerer problemløst?
Does it consider that competition rules are being properly applied in the Greek banking sector?
Og hvis ikke: Hvilke muligheder har Kommissionen for at intervenere for at normalisere det græske bankmarked?
If not, what measures can it take to remedy this situation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4154/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4154/06
Om: Renteforskelle i euroområdet og i Grækenland
Subject: Difference in interest rates between the eurozone and Greece
Grækenland er det næstdyreste land, hvad angår personlige lån og forbrugslån (9,33 % i Grækenland sammenlignet med 6,83 % i euroområdet) samt boliglån (fast rente for et år: 4,25 % i Grækenland; 3,59 % i euroområdet).
On the whole, Greece is the second most expensive country regarding the cost of personal and consumer loans (9.33 % in Greece, compared with 6.83 % in the eurozone) and for mortgages (one-year fixed interest of 4.25 % in Greece, compared with a eurozone figure of 3.59 %).
Samtidig har de seks største græske banker, som dækker over 80 % af det græske bankmarked, noteret en fortjeneste på 1,6 mia. EUR i første halvår af 2006.
At the same time, the six largest Greek banks, accounting for over 80 % of the Greek banking sector, recorded net profits of EUR 1.6 billion in the first half of 2006.
Den Europæiske Centralbank forklarer disse forskelle under henvisning til forretningspraksis, de regulerende og finansielle bestemmelser samt de græske markedsstrukturer.
The European Central Bank attributes these disparities to business practices, regulatory and financial provisions and Greek market structures.
Hvilke skridt kan Kommissionen tage for i størst mulig udstrækning at beskytte de græske forbrugere?
What action can the Commission take to provide maximum protection for Greek consumers?
Råder Kommissionen over oplysninger om kreditinstitutternes driftsudgifter i de forskellige medlemsstater, der hører til euroområdet?
Does the Commission have information concerning the operating expenses of the various eurozone financial institutions?
Er der så stor forskel mellem euroområdets og Grækenlands gennemsnit, at det berettiger til, at renterne i Grækenland skal være så meget højere?
Is the difference between the eurozone average and the figures for Greece large enough to justify the fact that Greek interest rates are so much higher?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4173/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4173/06
af Jacek Protasiewicz (PPE-DE)
by Jacek Protasiewicz (PPE‑DE)
Om: Overtrædelse af EF-­traktatens artikel 49 til skade for en entreprenør, der arbejder i det indre marked
Subject: Breach of Article 49 of the EC Treaty in respect of a firm operating in the EU common market
Kommissionen modtog i midten af juli 2006 en klage over de tyske toldmyndigheders uretfærdige og diskriminerende behandling af den polske virksomhed Westbud.
During the first half of July 2006, a complaint was lodged with the Commission concerning the unwarranted and discriminatory treatment suffered by a Polish firm, Westbud, at the hands of the German customs services.
Klagerne mener, at der i det foreliggende tilfælde efter al sandsynlighed har været tale om en overtrædelse af EF-­traktatens artikel 49, hvilket forhindrede dem i at levere de ydelser, de havde aftalt med deres tyske ordregiver.
The complainants believe that, in all likelihood, this action represented a breach of Article 49 of the EC Treaty, as a result of which the Polish firm was unable to perform the work it was required to under the agreement it had concluded with a German contractor.
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet i det foreliggende tilfælde?
What action has the Commission taken in this matter and what progress has been made in investigating it?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4191/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4191/06
Ifølge en nylig Eurostat-undersøgelse er antallet af uheld konstant faldende, selvom antallet af privatbiler er steget betragteligt i de senere år.
According to recent Eurostat research, the number of road accidents is steadily declining, despite the dramatic rise in the number of private cars over the last few years.
Ikke desto mindre mistede over 43000 mennesker livet ved trafikulykker i 2004 i de 25 medlemsstater.
Nevertheless in 2004 over 43000 persons died on the roads in the 25 Member States.
Hvad mener Kommissionen om denne kendsgerning?
How does the Commission view this fact?
Hvilke midler stiller den til rådighed for medlemsstaterne til forbedring af deres vejnet, og hvilke beløb har hver enkelt af de 25 medlemsstater brugt til dette formål?
How much funding does it provide to Member States to improve their road networks and what sums has each of the 25 used for this purpose?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4192/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4192/06
Om: Indstilling af betalinger som et led i CADSES — Interreg III B — Naboskabsprogrammet
Subject: Suspension of payments under the Cadses Interreg IIIB neighbourhood programme
Ifølge forlydender har Kommissionen vedtaget indtil videre at indstille alle betalinger som et led i CADSES — Interreg III B — Naboskabsprogrammet.
I have heard that the Commission has decided to suspend all payments under the Cadses Interreg IIIB neighbourhood programme until further notice.
På trods heraf opfordres alle parter til at arbejde videre med projekterne som planlagt, da der ellers er risiko for at miste støttemidlerne.
Nevertheless, all partners are being requested to proceed with work on the projects as planned, or face the prospect of funding being withdrawn.
Er denne situation korrekt?
Is this actually the case?
I bekræftende fald er det netop smv'er, der som følge af indstillingen af betalinger forfordeles, og som jo egentlig skulle fremmes via dette program.
If so, the suspension of payments will be detrimental to SMEs, the very firms which this programme was intended to assist.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4193/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4193/06
Om: Punkter af interesse for topmødet mellem EU og Indien
Subject: Points of interest for the EU‑India Summit
Hvad vil Kommissionen gøre for at fremme lige muligheder for Indiens »kasteløse« (dalitter), den oprindelige befolkning (adivasier) og andre minoriteter i forbindelse med EU-­baserede firmaers og investorers virksomhed?
How does the Commission intend to promote equal opportunities for India’s ‘outcastes’ (Dalits), indigenous people (Adivasi) and other minorities in the context of the operations of EU‑based companies and investors?
Er Kommissionen, med henvisning til OECD's retningslinjer, ifølge hvilke ikke-forskelsbehandling er et vigtigt princip, villig til på topmødet mellem EU og Indien at henlede opmærksomheden på Ambedkar-principperne, som ngo'er har foreslået, og til at anbefale, at de drøftes på erhvervstopmødet mellem EU og Indien?
With reference to the OECD guidelines in which non-discrimination is a crucial principle, is the Commission willing to draw attention at the EU‑India Summit to the Ambedkar Principles proposed by NGOs and to recommend discussion on them at the EU‑India Business Summit?
(For flere oplysninger om Ambedkar-principperne se: http://indianet.nl/ambedkarprinciples.html)
(For Ambedkar principles see: http://www.indianet.nl/ambedkarprinciples.html)
Ngo'er vurderer, at mere end halvdelen af alle indiske børn mellem 6 og 14 år ikke går i skole, og at dalitter og adivasier udgør et uforholdsmæssigt stort antal.
NGOs assess that more than half of India's children between the age of 6 and 14 do not go to school, and a disproportionate number of them are Dalits and Adivasi.