natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at den pågældende status som »valgt tilbudsgiver« er tildelt korrekt på baggrund af det økonomisk mest fordelagtige tilbud?
Can the Commission state that it is satisfied that the ‘preferred bidder’ status has been awarded correctly on the basis of the most economically advantageous tender?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008862/2011
Question for written answer E-008862/2011
(14. oktober 2011)
(14 October 2011)
Som svar på spørgsmål E‑2415/2006 om de eventuelle negative konsekvenser, som direktiverne om elektrisk og elektronisk udstyr (WEEE) og begrænsning af anvendelsen af visse farlige stoffer (RoHS) vil have for orgelindustrien, fastslog Kommissionen følgende:
In answer to Question E‑2415/2006, relating to the possible negative effect that the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and Restrictions on Hazardous Substances (RoHS) directives would have on the organ-building industry, the Commission stated:
Kommissionens holdning efter at have hørt en lang række medlemsstater er, at orgler i kirker, koncertsale osv. typisk ikke udgør »forbrugerudstyr« i henhold til definitionen i kategori 4 i WEEE-direktivet.
‘Having assessed the views of a large number of Member States, the Commission’s opinion (3) is that pipe organs installed in churches, concert halls, etc. typically do not constitute “Consumer Equipment” in the sense of Category C of the WEEE Directive.
Derfor hører de heller ikke under anvendelsesområdet for RoHS-direktivet, og det er derfor ikke nødvendigt at søge om undtagelser.
Accordingly, they are not within the scope of the RoHS Directive either and no exemptions need to be applied for.
En juridisk fortolkning af EU-lovgivningen hører i henhold til traktaten udelukkende under EU-Domstolens kompetenceområde.
A legal interpretation of Community legislation is, under the Treaty, the exclusive competence of the European Court of Justice.’ .
Trods dette svar risikerer orgelindustrien imidlertid fortsat, at direktivet vil finde anvendelse på industrien.
Yet, despite this response, organ builders still face the possibility that the directive will be applied to their industry.
Inden for min egen valgkreds beskæftiger en orgelvirksomhed, som har bygget orgler i 139 år, over 50 personer.
I have one organ factory in my constituency, which employs more than 50 people and has been proudly building organs for 139 years.
Har Kommissionen ændret holdning?
Has the Commission’s opinion altered?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008863/2011
Question for written answer E-008863/2011
Om: Dom over en aktivist fra det polske mindretal
Subject: Sentencing of a Polish activist in Belarus
Dommen betyder, at Andrzej Poczobut om to år atter skal møde op ved domstolen, der vil vurdere hans adfærd i den periode, hvor dommen er betinget.
This ruling means that in two years’ time Andrzej Poczobut will once again have to face the court, which will assess his actions during the period of the suspended sentence.
Der er ingen tvivl om, at dommen over Andrzej Poczobut er politisk motiveret.
It is quite clear that the sentencing of Andrzej Poczobut was politically motivated.
Aktivisten havde ikke ret til et effektivt forsvar, fordi retten afviste alle hans anmodninger, herunder en anmodning om at forhøre forsvarets vidner.
Poczobut was denied the right to effective defence because the court rejected all his applications, including an application for defence witnesses to be heard.
Journalister eller aktivister fra sammenslutningen af polakker i Hviderusland havde ikke adgang til retsmøderne.
Neither journalists nor activists from the Union of Poles in Belarus were permitted to attend the hearing.
I denne forbindelse vil jeg gerne spørge Kommissionen, om den har til hensigt at gribe ind over for de hviderussiske myndigheders åbenlyse undertrykkelse af Andrzej Poczobut?
Does the Commission intend to intervene on behalf of Andrzej Poczobut, who is clearly the victim of a campaign of repression by the Belarusian authorities?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008864/2011
Question for written answer E-008864/2011
Om: Indtagelse af yoghurt uden fedt
Subject: Consumption of fat-free yoghurt
Ifølge en undersøgelse, der er foretaget i Danmark af 70 000 gravide kvinder, har kvinder, som spiser frugtyoghurt hver dag, større risiko for at føde børn, som får astma.
A recent study on 70 000 pregnant women in Denmark has shown that women who ate fruit yoghurt daily were at a far greater risk of giving birth to children who suffer from asthma.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvilken strategi den agter at tage i brug for at informere de særligt udsatte personer om de risici, som denne fødevare giver?
Can the Commission indicate what its strategy is for providing food safety information to people particularly at risk?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008865/2011
Question for written answer E-008865/2011
Om: Fødevarer, der stammer fra klonede dyr
Subject: Food from cloned animals
Artiklens forfattere hævder, at otte køer, der nedstammer direkte fra de klonede køer, har yderligere 97 efterkommere.
The article goes on to indicate that eight direct offspring of cloned cows have gone on into produce a further 97 animals.
Eftersom der på nuværende tidspunkt ikke eksisterer nogen lovgivning om produkter, der stammer fra klonede dyr, kan Kommissionen så oplyse, om den har kendskab til situationen i Storbritannien eller lignende situationer i andre medlemsstater?
Given that no legislation currently exists regarding products from cloned animals, can the Commission say whether it is aware of the situation in the United Kingdom or similar situations in other Member States?
Har Kommissionen desuden stadig den samme holdning, når det gælder forbuddet mod indtagelse af produkter fra disse dyr?
Does it maintain its position regarding the ban on consumption of products from such animals?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008866/2011
Question for written answer E-008866/2011
Om: Gennemførelsen af direktiv 2006/123/EF
Subject: Compliance with Directive 2006/123/EC
Er Kommissionen klar over, at Rumænien ikke har gennemført direktiv 2006/123/EF korrekt, når det gælder afskaffelsen af godkendelser, der skal fornyes hvert femte år, for elinstallatører, som udtænker, opstiller, kontrollerer og udnytter elnettets elektriske installationer?
Is the Commission aware of the fact that Romania is failing to implement correctly Directive 2006/123/EC ending the system of five-year renewable authorisations for the activity of electricians responsible for the design, manufacture, inspection and utilisation of grid-connected electrical installations?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008867/2011
Question for written answer E-008867/2011
Om: Omledning af vand mellem floderne Júcar og Vinalopó
Subject: Júcar-Vinalopó water diversion scheme
Kommissionen fremsatte i sin beslutning KOM(2003)5311 og KOM(2006)6739 af 23. december 2003 og 13. december 2006 en række betingelser, der skal opfyldes af Spanien, for at yde medfinansiering af 120 millioner EUR til det store projekt »Omledning af vand mellem floderne Júcar og Vinalopó« med EFRU-midler.
In its Decisions C(2003)5311 of 23 December 2003 and C(2006)6739 of 13 December 2006, the Commission laid down a range of conditions for Spain to fulfil in order to receive ERDF co-financing to the tune of EUR 120 million for a major project to build a pipeline between the Júcar and Vinalopó basins.
I fjerde bestemmelse i artikel 2 til Kommissionens beslutning KOM(2003)5311 fastsættes det, at »principperne og bestemmelserne fastsat i Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2000/60/EF af 23. oktober 2000 om fastlæggelse af en ramme for Fællesskabets vandpolitiske foranstaltninger finder anvendelse på nærværende projekt«.
The fourth condition set out in Article 2 of Decision C(2003)5311 stipulates that the principles and provisions laid down in Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy apply to the project in question.
EU‑Domstolens dom af 7. maj 2009 i sag C‑516/7 dømte Kongeriget Spanien for overtrædelse af artikel 3 i direktiv 2000/60/EF.
In its judgment of 7 May 2009 in Case C‑516/07, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that Spain had failed to comply with Article 3 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Den 27. juli 2011 indgav Kommissionen en klage til EU‑Domstolen mod Kongeriget Spanien for overtrædelse af artikel 13, stk. 1, 2, 3 og 6, artikel 14, stk. 1, litra c), og artikel 15, stk. 1.
On 27 July 2011, the Commission lodged an application with the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning Spain’s failure to comply with Article 13(1), (2), (3) and (6), Article 14(1)(c) and Article 15(1).
Den manglende overholdelse påvirker blandt andet vandområdet Júcar, hvor det medfinansierede projekt er beliggende.
The directive is being breached in a number of different river basin districts, including the Júcar district, where the co-financed project is being built.
Hvilke tiltag vil Kommissionen træffe inden for rammerne af dette projekt med hensyn til denne manglende overholdelse og dens indvirkning på den korrekte gennemførelse af beslutning KOM(2003)5311?
What is the Commission going to do about this project in view of these breaches and their impact as regards the correct application of Decision C(2003)5311?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008869/2011
Question for written answer E-008869/2011
Om: Spanske bankers ansvar for salg af våben til Gaddafi
Subject: Implication of Spanish banks in arms sales to Gaddafi
Ifølge en rapport fra organisationen for etisk finansiering, SETEM, var klyngebomberne MAT-120, der blev brugt af Gaddafi i hans angreb på den libyske befolkning i Misrata, finansieret af spanske banker.
According to a report published by the ethical finance organisation SETEM, production of the MAT-120 cluster bombs used by Gaddafi to attack the population of Misrata in Libya was funded by Spanish banks.
De spanske banker Cajalón (koncernen Caja Rural), Caja España, Caja Mediterráneo, Bankinter, Ibercaja, Banco Popular, Banc Sabadell og La Caixa bidrog alle til finansieringen af den spanske virksomhed Instalaza.
Cajalón (Caja Rural group), Caja España, Caja Mediterráneo, Bankinter, Ibercaja, Banco Popular, Banc Sabadell and La Caixa all helped fund the Spanish company Instalaza.
Mange af disse banker har modtaget offentlig støtte fra FROB, der er et tiltag vedtaget af Kommissionen.
Many of these banks have received public funding from the FROB, which is a Commission-approved mechanism.
I januar 2009 bibeholdt Instalaza stadig klyngebomben MAT-120 i kataloget på sit websted, der ud over at være militært udstyr er forbudt i henhold til Dublintraktaten.
In January 2009 the MAT-120 cluster bomb was still listed in Instalaza's Internet catalogue, despite its being a type of military equipment banned by the Dublin Treaty.
I slutningen af 2009 havde virksomheden ifølge regnskabsdokumentet »Indlånskonti: 2009«, udarbejdet af Instalaza SA, selv i 2010 udestående lån udstedt af Deutsche Bank, Cajalón, Caja España, Bankinter, Barclays Bank og Banco Popular.
At the end of 2009, according to the accounting document ‘Financial statement 2009’ drawn up by Instalaza SA in 2010, the company had outstanding loans from Deutsche Bank, Cajalón, Caja España, Bankinter, Barclays Bank and Banco Popular.
Konventionen om klyngeammunition blev vedtaget i Dublin den 30. maj 2008 af 107 lande og underskrevet i december samme år.
The Convention on Cluster Munitions was adopted in Dublin on 30 May 2008 by 107 States and signed in December that year.
Fra 1. august 2010 blev denne konvention en del af international ret, der er bindende for FN‑medlemsstater.
From 1 August 2010 the convention became binding international law for UN Member States.
Ifølge forskellige undersøgelser er 98 % af ofrene for disse bomber civile.
According to various studies, 98 % of the victims of this type of weapon are civilians.
Mener Kommissionen, at det er rimeligt, at finansielle institutioner, der modtager offentlige tilskud, bidrager til finansieringen af virksomheder, der har overtrådt Dublintraktaten?
Does the Commission consider it reasonable for publicly-assisted financial bodies to provide funding for companies which have failed to comply with the Dublin Treaty?
Hvilke foranstaltninger mener Kommissionen at kunne træffe for at sikre, at Dublintraktaten overholdes effektivt i hele verden, og forhindre massakrer på civile med klyngebomber?
What steps does the Commission consider could be taken to ensure the effective worldwide application of the Dublin Treaty to prevent civilians being massacred by cluster bombs?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008870/2011
Question for written answer E-008870/2011
Om: Revision af Grækenlands statsunderskud i 2009
Subject: Revision of Greek deficit for 2009
Ifølge klager fra medlemmer af bestyrelsen i den nu uafhængige græske statistikmyndighed (ELSTAT) til økonomiudvalget i det græske parlament skete opjusteringen af det græske statsunderskud i 2009, som skyldtes den direkte inkorporering af de offentlige virksomheder og organisationer (DEKO) i den offentlige forvaltnings nationalregnskaber, bevidst, uden at der først var foretaget de nødvendige undersøgelser, og uden at myndighedens bestyrelse havde truffet beslutning herom.
According to allegations by members of the management board of the now independent Hellenic Statistical Authority (EL.STAT) to the Finance Committee of the Greek Parliament, the general government deficit for 2009 was deliberately revised upwards through inclusion of public utilities (DEKO) in the national accounts without the necessary investigations and in the absence of any decision by the management board of the Hellenic Statistical Authority.
Hvilke offentlige virksomheder og organisationer blev dengang inkorporeret?
Can the Commission say how many public utilities were included?
Vil Kommissionen venligst formidle os oplysninger for hver af de offentlige virksomheder og organisationer, som beviser, at kriterierne i EU‑forordningen ESA 95 er opfyldt, nærmere bestemt om 50 %-reglen er opfyldt?
Can the Commission provide us with information for each of the public utilities in question, indicating whether they fulfil ESA 95 criteria and in particular the 50 % rule?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008871/2011
Question for written answer E-008871/2011
Takket være de politikker, som både EU og de enkelte medlemsstater har ført for at reducere forureningen og behandle spildevand, er badevandet i Europa i dag afgjort renere end for 20 eller 40 år siden.
Thanks to the policies of the European Union and the Member States to reduce pollution and treat waste water, today's bathing water in Europe is considerably cleaner than 20 or 40 years ago.
I de seneste år har der imidlertid været en modsatrettet tendens.
However, in the last few years, this trend has been reversed.
Ifølge en rapport fra Det Europæiske Miljøagentur var procentdelen af badevand, der ikke overholder minimumsstandarderne som angivet i det nye direktiv om kvaliteten af badevand (2006/7/EF), i 2010 på 1,2 % for havkyster og 2,8 % for indre kyster.
According to a report by the European Environment Agency, 1.2 % of sea water and 2.8 % of lake water did not comply with the minimum standards required by the new directive on bathing water quality (2006/7/EC).
Kvalitetsforringelsen afspejler ikke kun de ændringer, der normalt konstateres fra år til år, men viser også, at det er nødvendigt at gøre en indsats for at sikre, at kvaliteten af badevandet forbedres og fastholdes konstant.
This drop in quality does not merely reflect the normal variations from year to year, but indicates that further efforts are needed to ensure that bathing water quality is constantly improved and maintained.
I betragtning af den forværring af kvaliteten af badevand, der blev konstateret i 2010, og den samtidige betydelige forringelse i procentdelen af de analyserede vandprøver, hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen da at iværksætte for at sikre borgerne og de europæiske turismeaktører rent og sikkert badevand?
In view of the 2010 drop in both bathing water quality and the percentage of analysed water samples, what steps does the Commission intend to take to ensure clean and safe bathing water for the benefit of citizens and operators in the European tourism sector?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008873/2011
Question for written answer E-008873/2011
Om: Konsolidering af den georgianske mafias tilstedeværelse på EU's område
Subject: Consolidation of the presence of the Georgian mafia on EU territory
Det fremgår af pressen, at de græske sikkerhedsstyrker for nylig anholdt 28 medlemmer af en mafialignende organisation fortrinsvis bestående af borgere fra Georgien, som havde igangsat en pengeafpresningsaktivitet, der gik ud over ca. 50 erhvervsvirksomheder af mindre og mellemstort omfang beliggende forskellige steder i Grækenland.
The press has reported that Greek security forces recently arrested 28 members of a mafia organisation made up primarily of Georgian citizens, who had set up an extortion business targeting around 50 small and medium-sized businesses in different parts of Greece.
Organisationen havde indtil da samlet ca. en halv mio. EUR, der for en stor dels vedkommende var til organisationens ledere i Georgien.
The organisation had hitherto obtained around half a million euro, for the most part intended for the leaders of the organisation in Georgia.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om dette er første gang, at den georgianske mafia konsoliderer sine kriminelle aktiviteter i EU?
Can the Commission say whether this is the first time that the Georgian mafia has consolidated its criminal activities within the EU?
Finder Kommissionen det muligt, at udbredelsen af forbrydelser af georgiansk oprindelse i EU i det mindste delvist skyldes den gradvise politiske tilnærmelse mellem EU og Georgien?
Does it consider it possible that the expansion of Georgian crime in the EU is due — at least in part — to the gradual political rapprochement between the EU and Georgia?
Mener Kommissionen i bekræftende fald, at regeringen i Georgien har leveret hele den nødvendige assistance til forebyggelse af kriminalitet, som partnerskabs- og samarbejdsaftalen mellem EU og Georgien tager højde for?
If so, does it believe that the government of Georgia has provided all the assistance necessary for crime prevention, as provided by the partnership and cooperation agreement between the EU and Georgia?
Mener Kommissionen, at denne organisation allerede kan have igangsat lignende pengeafpresningsaktiviteter i de andre Balkanlande og navnlig i EU‑medlemsstaterne på Balkan?
Does it believe that the organisation in question may have already set up similar extortion activities in the other Balkan states and, in particular, in the Member States located in the Balkans?
Mener Kommissionen, at disse medlemsstater råder over tilstrækkelige kompetencer og ressourcer til at tackle mulige kriminalitetsproblemer som det pågældende?
Does it believe that these states have sufficient skills and resources to deal with a possible criminal emergency such as this?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008874/2011
Question for written answer E-008874/2011
Om: Kosovos tidligere premierminister involveret i forsvinden af og drab på centrale vidner i retssagen om krigsforbrydelser mod ham
Subject: Involvement of the former Prime Minister of Kosovo in the disappearance and killing of key witnesses required to testify in his trial on suspicion of war crimes
Kosovos tidligere premierminister og tidligere kommandant for Kosovos befrielseshær (KLA), Ramush Haradinaj, har været i søgelyset hos Det Internationale Krigsforbrydertribunal vedrørende det Tidligere Jugoslavien for bl.a. voldtægt, tortur og drab begået mod civile serbere.
Ramush Haradinaj, the former Prime Minister of Kosovo and former commander of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), has been investigated by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia on suspicion of having committed war crimes, particularly rape, torture and the murder of Serb civilians.
Haradinajs sag blev henlagt i 2008 og genåbnet i 2010.
Haradinaj’s case was closed in 2008 and reopened in 2010.
I september 2011 understregede de serbiske myndigheder, at Haradinaj kan være direkte ansvarlig for forsvinden af og drab på mange centrale vidner, som kunne have bekræftet pålideligheden af anklagerne mod ham i sagen ved Det Internationale Krigsforbrydertribunal og derved gøre det muligt at drage ham til ansvar.
In September 2011, the Serbian authorities stated that Haradinaj might have been directly responsible for the disappearance and murder of many key witnesses who could otherwise have confirmed that the charges brought against him before the International Criminal Tribunal were true, thus enabling him to be brought to justice.
De serbiske myndigheder mener bl.a., at Haradinaj har givet ordre til at dræbe mindst 10 vidner, hvoraf den sidste forsvandt i de seneste uger.
In particular, the Serbian authorities believe that Haradinaj ordered the killing of at least ten witnesses, the last of whom has disappeared in recent weeks.
Har Kommissionen kendskab til de serbiske myndigheders mistanker om Haradinajs involvering i centrale vidners forsvinden?
Is the Commission aware of the suspicions of the Serbian authorities regarding the implication of Haradinaj in the disappearance of key witnesses?
Råder Kommissionen over yderligere oplysninger i denne forbindelse?
Does it have any further information about the matter?
Mener Kommissionen i betragtning af, at Kosovo er en potentiel kandidat til tiltrædelse af EU og i betragtning af den rolle, som Haradinaj i øjeblikket spiller i Kosovos politiske verden, at det er af afgørende betydning at afklare hans mulige ansvar?
As Kosovo is a potential candidate for accession to the EU and bearing in mind the role which Haradinaj is currently playing in Kosovo politics, does the Commission consider it vital to clarify his possible responsibilities?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvorvidt Kosovos myndigheder har indledt procedurer til at efterforske en mulig involvering af Haradinaj, og agter den at træffe foranstaltninger for at sikre, at disse procedurer bliver fuldstændigt gennemsigtige?
Can the Commission indicate whether the Kosovo authorities have initiated procedures to investigate Haradinaj’s possible involvement, and will it take measures to ensure the greatest possible transparency of those procedures?
Mener Kommissionen, at andre af Kosovos politikere kan være involveret i lignende forbrydelser?
Does it believe that other politicians in Kosovo might be implicated in similar crimes?
Mener Kommissionen ikke i lyset af denne udvikling, at det kan være på sin plads at stille Kosovos optagelse i EU i bero, indtil det bliver bevist, at hele den politiske klasse i Kosovo slet ikke har noget at gøre med de forbrydelser, der blev begået i krigens år?
Does it consider that, in the light of such developments, it would be desirable not to allow Kosovo to join the EU until it has been proven that the whole political class in Kosovo is entirely innocent of the crimes committed during the war years?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008875/2011
Question for written answer E-008875/2011
Om: Den egyptiske regering involveret i beskyttelsen af terrorister, der i 2011 udførte et attentat mod det koptiske samfund i Alexandria
Subject: Involvement of the Egyptian Government in protecting the terrorists responsible for the attack of January 2011 on the Coptic community in Alexandria
Det fremgår i pressen, at den egyptiske koptiske kirke den 3. september 2011 indgav anmeldelse mod Egyptens premierminister, indenrigsminister og statsanklager på grund af manglende gennemsigtighed i retssagen mod de ansvarlige for et attentat udført mod en kirke i Alexandria i januar 2011, hvor 23 egyptiske koptere mistede livet.
According to reports in the press, on 13 September the Coptic Church in Egypt filed a lawsuit against Egypt’s Prime Minister, Minister of the Interior and Public Prosecutions Department, for lack of transparency in the proceedings against those responsible for the bombing of the church in Alexandria in January 2011 which killed 23 Egyptian Copts.