natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Om: Økonomisk støtte til EU‑borgere
Subject: Financial support for EU citizens
Findes der programmer, som yder økonomisk støtte til EU‑borgere, der ønsker at starte egen virksomhed, specifikt på området for træning med personlig træner?
Are there any programmes which offer financial support for EU citizens who wish to start up their own businesses, specifically in the area of personal fitness training?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007218/2011
Question for written answer E-007218/2011
Om: Græsk misligholdelse
Subject: Greek default
Kan Kommissionen fremlægge de seneste oplysninger om den uønskede risiko for finansiel misligholdelse fra Grækenlands side?
Could the Commission please provide the latest information on the unwanted possibility of a Greek financial default?
Hvis det værste skulle ske, er der så fastlagt forebyggende beredskabsplaner for at afbøde virkningerne af en sådan misligholdelse?
Should the worst happen, have any precautionary contingency plans been drawn up to mitigate the effects of a default?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007219/2011
Question for written answer E-007219/2011
Om: Brintoverilte og tandblegning
Subject: Hydrogen peroxide and teeth whitening
Hvilken koncentration af brintoverilte kan anvendes sikkert i kosmetiske produkter til tandblegning?
What percentage concentration of hydrogen peroxide can safely be used in cosmetic products for the whitening of teeth?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007220/2011
Question for written answer E-007220/2011
Om: Grænseoverskridende bortførelse af børn iværksat af en forælder
Subject: Cross-border abduction of children by a parent
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet eller planlagt at træffe for at hjælpe forældre, hvis barn/børn er bortført af en medforælder til et tredjeland (uden for EU)?
What has the Commission done, or is it planning to do, to help a parent who has had their child(ren) abducted by a fellow parent to a third non-EU country?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007222/2011
Question for written answer E-007222/2011
Om: Den overvurderede euro
Subject: Overvalued euro
Formanden for Eurogruppen, Jean-Claude Juncker, anser euroen for »overvurderet« i udtalelser efter en høring i Europa-Parlamentets økonomiudvalg i Strasbourg.
The Eurogroup President, Jean-Claude Juncker, referred to the euro as ‘overvalued’ when addressing a meeting of Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs in Strasbourg.
Den europæiske valuta steg i foregående uge fra 1,41 USD til 1,46 USD, og mandag nåede den det højeste niveau i en måned, da den blev noteret for en stigning til 1,47 USD.
Last week, the euro rose from 1:1.42 against the dollar to 1:1.46, and on Monday it reached its highest rate over the last month, at 1.47 dollars to the euro.
I en tid med en international økonomisk krise og, i Portugals tilfælde, med manglen på egne energiressourcer, er overvurderingen af euroen endnu værre.
Coming at a time of international economic crisis, this overvaluing of the euro is even more damaging in the case of Portugal, which lacks its own energy resources.
Lande som Angola og Mozambique, som traditionelt har privilegerede handelsforbindelser med Portugal, er fristede til at købe produkter med USD for derved at kunne få billigere produkter og dermed højere avancer.
Countries such as Mozambique and Angola, which traditionally have privileged trading relations with Portugal, are tempted to buy products in dollars in order to pay less and thereby make more profit.
Hvilken eller hvilke grunde er skyld i dette fænomen?
What are the reasons behind this phenomenon?
Hvilke skridt vil blive taget for at vende denne udvikling?
What steps are being taken or planned to reverse this trend?
Er det muligt, at den omtalte overvurdering af euroen kommer til at forsinke det økonomiske opsving i lande som Portugal?
Will this overvaluation of the euro be allowed to delay the economic recovery of countries such as Portugal?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007223/2011
Question for written answer E-007223/2011
Kommissionen er gennem sin kommissær for konkurrence i færd med at undersøge den såkaldte tax lease‑ordning og har som forebyggende foranstaltning valgt at indstille ordningen, indtil det påvises, om den er i strid med EU’s konkurrenceregler.
The Commission, via its Competition Committee, is conducting a preventive audit of the tax-lease financing system, leaving it paralysed pending the results of investigations to determine whether it is in breach of EU competition rules.
Dette finansieringssystem har de seneste år fungeret som et alternativ til de tidligere støtteordninger og er afgørende for at kunne udvikle industrien for skibsbygning og -reparation.
This financing system, which has provided an alternative to old-fashioned state aid in the shipbuilding sector in recent years, has been an indispensable factor in the development of the shipbuilding and repairing industry.
Det har gennem denne ordning været muligt at skabe over 8 000 direkte job og flere tusinde indirekte job i byen Vigo, som netop er præget af stor arbejdsløshed inden for andre sektorer såsom bygningsindustrien og servicesektoren.
This financing has thus directly led to the creation of over 8 000 jobs and indirectly created thousands more in the municipality of Vigo, in a context of strongly rising unemployment in other sectors such as construction or services.
Skibsbygningssektoren har de seneste år lagt stor vægt på specialiseret arbejdskraft, innovation og teknologi for at få adgang til nye markeder og opnå kontrakter inden for skibsbygning.
In recent years, the shipbuilding sector has made herculean efforts in terms of labour specialisation, innovation and technological development to open itself up to new markets and obtain shipbuilding contracts.
Indstillingen af den nuværende tax lease‑ordning udgør imidlertid en alvorlig trussel for denne sektor, eftersom det i praksis bliver umuligt for spanske skibsværfter at indgå aftaler om bygning af nye skibe, hvilket især vil berøre den civile skibsbygning i Vigo.
However, the fact that the tax-lease system has been put on ice could well undo all this work since it is currently impossible, in practice, to grant contracts for new ships in Spanish shipyards, particularly civilian shipyards in the Vigo estuary building civilian ships.
Indstillingen af ordningen sker på et kritisk tidspunkt, eftersom indgåelsen af nye aftaler kunne afhjælpe den nuværende arbejdsløshed og gøre det muligt at beskæftige de tusindvis af arbejdstagere, som de seneste år er blevet afskediget fra skibsværfterne på grund af mangel på arbejde.
What is more, this threat comes at a critical time, as the signing of new contracts would alleviate the situation of widespread unemployment and enable the thousands of shipbuilders and auxiliary workers who were laid off because there was not enough work to return to work at the shipyards.
Nogle skibsværfter, herunder Barreras de Vigo, som har eksisteret i over 100 år, har været nødsaget til at indgive konkursbegæring, da virksomheden har mistet sine fremtidige ordrer som følge af indstillingen af tax lease‑ordningen.
Certain shipyards, however, including historical yards such as Barreras de Vigo, which has been operating for over 100 years, have been forced to begin insolvency proceedings because their future orders are on hold owing to the freezing of the tax-lease system.
Har den spanske regering anmodet Kommissionen om at bevare tax lease‑ordningen?
Has the Spanish Government appealed to the Commission to keep the tax-lease system?
Har den spanske regering foreslået Kommissionen et alternativ til det nuværende finansieringssystem?
Has the Spanish Government made a proposal to the Commission concerning an alternative to the current financing system?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007224/2011
Question for written answer E-007224/2011
Om: Forholdene på KEPEP i Lechaina, Ileia, og udviklingen i psykiatrireformen i Grækenland
Subject: Living conditions in the care centre for children with severe physical and mental disabilities in Lechaina and progress of the reform of psychiatric healthcare in Greece
Det fremgår af nye anklager og artikler, at der på KEPEP i Lechaina, Ileia (institution for børn med alvorlige fysiske og psykiske handicap) anvendes uacceptable metoder med fiksering af børnene i sengen ved brug af særlige remme.
New complaints and press reports indicate that, at the care centre for children with severe physical and mental disabilities (KEPEP) in Lechaina (Ilia prefecture), the unacceptable practice of violently restraining children using beds with special straps is still used.
Det er en metode, som også Kommissionen betegner som umenneskelig, uhensigtsmæssig og ydmygende behandling.
The Commission has described the practice as inhumane and inappropriate, and considers that it constitutes degrading treatment.
Overholder de græske myndigheder deres forsikring om, at finansieringen af sundhedstjenester for psykisk syge ikke vil blive yderligere forsinket, og at alle fremtidige betalinger vil ske rettidigt?
Are the Greek authorities following up their assurances that there would be no further delays in the financing of mental health services and that all future payments would be made in a timely manner?
Er Kommissionen tilfreds med udviklingen i psykiatrireformen i Grækenland?
Is the Commission satisfied with the progress of the reform of the Greek psychiatric healthcare system?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007225/2011
Question for written answer E-007225/2011
Om: Omlægning af de nationale energipolitikker og konsekvenser for klimamålene
Subject: Reorientation of national energy policies and effects on climate objectives
IEA reviderer for øjeblikket sine scenarier og udvikler især et »Lower-Nuclear Case«-scenario for det nye »World Energy Outlook«, som skal fremkomme i fjerde kvartal.
The IEA is currently revising its scenarios and in particular is developing a ‘Lower-nuclear case’ scenario for the new ‘World Energy Outlook’ that will appear in the fourth quarter.
Der vil være færre forlængelser af de eksisterende atomkraftværkers levetid.
There will be fewer extensions of the operational lives of existing nuclear power stations.
Et stigende antal eksisterende reaktorer kan blive lukket før tiden som følge af øgede sikkerhedskrav eller politiske beslutninger (Tyskland).
A growing number of existing reactors could be closed down earlier than planned because of more stringent safety requirements or political decisions, as in Germany.
Udgifterne til nye atomkraftværker vil kunne stige.
The costs of new nuclear power stations could rise.
IEA går altså ud fra, at de globale klimamål økonomisk set ikke kan opfyldes, hvis udbygningen af atomkraften udskydes, og der sker en delvis udfasning.
The IEA considers therefore that it will be economically impossible to achieve global climate objectives if the extension of nuclear power is delayed and some installations are shut down.
Dette giver anledning til at spørge, hvordan Kommissionen vurderer de seneste måneders nationale beslutninger, ikke mindst i den tyske regering.
The question then arises as to how the Commission views the national decisions of recent months — not least that of the German Government.
Hvilken indflydelse har disse beslutninger eksempelvis på efterspørgslen efter CO 2 ‑certifikater og dermed på priserne?
What is the impact of these decisions, for instance on demand for carbon certificates, and on prices?
Har Kommissionen planer om at revurdere sine gamle scenarier, som jo allerede danner grundlag for beslutninger?
Does the Commission plan to review its old scenarios, on which decisions have already been based?
Vil Kommissionen med henblik på klimaforhandlingerne i Durban ændre sin holdning og strategi i forhold til sidste gang?
With regard to the climate negotiations in Durban, will the Commission’s position and strategy be different from those it recently espoused?
Hvilke konsekvenser vil disse nationale beslutninger og ikke mindst de beslutninger, som klart fremskynder udbygningen af vedvarende energiformer, få for målet om at gennemføre det indre marked for energi inden 2014?
How will these national decisions, particularly those on considerably speeding up the development of renewable forms of energy, affect the objective of completing the internal energy market by 2014?
Hvordan vil Kommissionen i fremtiden sikre en bedre koordinering af den nationale energipolitik, navnlig forud for nationale beslutninger med vidtrækkende konsekvenser for andre medlemsstater?
How does the Commission intend in future to ensure better coordination of national energy policies, particularly ahead of national decisions with far-reaching implications for other Member States?
Mener Kommissionen, at de stigende energipriser i Tysklands nabolande efter meddelelsen om, at otte atomkraftværker skulle lukkes, er et bevis på, at det indre marked for elektricitet fungerer?
Does the Commission see the rising energy prices in Germany’s neighbouring countries after the announcement that eight nuclear power stations were to be shut down as evidence that the internal market in energy is functioning?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007226/2011
Question for written answer E-007226/2011
Undertegnede fremsendte for noget tid siden skriftlig forespørgsel E‑1589/2010 om bekymrende støjgener fra motorcykler.
The Commission informed me that controlling noise levels fell under the competence of the national authorities (Question E‑1589/2010).
Tiden går, og problemet er endnu ikke løst.
Some time has passed, and the problem remains.
Hvorfor accepterer Kommissionen denne situation, når den tekniske udvikling gør det muligt at bekæmpe forurening, hvilket netop er en af målsætningerne med fællesskabslovgivningen?
Why is this state of affairs tolerated?
(Det kunne tyde på, at der er en interesse i at beskytte motorcykelfabrikanternes nuværende status).
Why is the principle of technological progress — mentioned on many occasions in European anti-pollution rules — not used as a basis for action against noise pollution? (it even appears as if there is a desire to protect the current status of moped manufacturers).
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007227/2011
Question for written answer E-007227/2011
Da situationen vedrørende medlemsstaternes offentlige gæld endnu ikke var alarmerende, gjorde undertegnede opmærksom på de risici, der var forbundet med de tre førende kreditvurderingsbureauer.
Before the public debt situation in the Member States had reached its current tragic proportions, I drew the Commission's attention to the risks posed by the three most powerful credit-rating agencies.
Kommissionens svar på skriftlig forespørgsel P‑2093/2010 betragtes dog som rent skrivebordsarbejde.
The answer I received was, if I may say so, nothing short of bureaucratic (P‑2093/2010).
Der er nu gået over et år, og den værste frygt for, at de amerikanske kreditvurderingsbureauer ville nedgradere medlemsstaternes offentlige gæld er efterhånden overstået.
Over a year has passed and the worst fears regarding the downgrading by these US agencies of EU Member States' public debt issuances have been more than fulfilled.
Den offentlige gæld i Portugal og Irland vurderes nu at svare til de såkaldte »junk bonds«, selv om disse landes regeringer har betalt store summer til kreditvurderingsbureauerne.
For example, Portugal and Ireland have already had their sovereign debt downgraded to ‘junk bonds’, despite their governments having paid large sums of money to these agencies in order to obtain credit ratings.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at medlemsstaternes regeringer bør opfordres til ikke at betale private virksomheder for en kreditvurdering?
Does the Commission consider it necessary to insist that the Governments of Member States should not be required to pay private firms in order to obtain a credit rating?
Er det ikke på tide at indføre et uafhængigt europæisk kreditvurderingsbureau?
Is it not time to set up an independent European credit-rating service?
Agter Kommissionen at indlede en undersøgelse af de tre kreditvurderingsbureauers dominerende position og konkurrenceforvridende praksisser?
Does the Commission intend to launch some form of procedure to assess the dominant position and anti-competitive practices used by these three credit-rating agencies?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007228/2011
Question for written answer E-007228/2011
Om: EU‑institutionernes anvendelse af private sociale netværk
Subject: Use of private social networks by the European institutions
Kommissionens svar på skriftlig forespørgsel E‑4558/2011 om EU‑institutionernes anvendelse af sociale netværk har skabt tvivl og givet anledning til yderligere spørgsmål.
The Commission’s answer to my recent question on the European institutions’ use of social networks (E‑004558/2011) raises further doubts and questions.
Der findes mange sociale netværk, som fungerer som kommunikationsmedie.
As we know, many social networks have become widely accepted as means of communication.
EU‑myndighedernes anvendelse af Twitter vakte imidlertid undren, hvilket gav anledning til skriftlig forespørgsel E‑2427/2011, som følgelig blev besvaret af Kommissionen.
I was therefore surprised to learn that the EU authorities preferred to use Twitter over all other communication channels, and I asked a question on the subject (E‑002427/2011) to which the Commission has recently replied.
Såfremt Kommissionen har kendskab til andre sociale netværk end Twitter, bedes følgende spørgsmål besvaret: 1.
Therefore, since the Commission is aware of the existence of social networks other than Twitter, I would like to ask: 1.
Finder Kommissionen det fortsat hensigtsmæssigt at anvende dette sociale netværk som det foretrukne offentlige kommunikationsmedie? 2.
Does the Commission still think that this social network should be used in preference to public communication channels? 2.
Mener Kommissionen fortsat, at embedsmænd bør offentliggøre meddelelser fra EU‑institutionerne via Twitter? 3.
Does the Commission still think that the institutions should communicate via Twitter when there is to be advertising on it, as its directors have announced? 3.
Hvorledes forholder Kommissionen sig til anvendelsen af dette sociale netværk, når den amerikanske handelskommission har indledt en undersøgelse af netværkets monopollignende praksisser?
What is the Commission’s view of the continuing use of this social network when it is under investigation by the US Federal Trade Commission for alleged abuse of a dominant market position?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007229/2011
Question for written answer E-007229/2011
I forbindelse med Kommissionens svar på skriftlig forespørgsel E‑3927/2011 om beskyttelse af kunder og brugere af finansielle tjenesteydelser var undertegnede bekendt med, at rapporten fra den spanske centralbank (Banco de España) udelukkende vedrørte det finansielle marked i Spanien, eftersom denne institution, som er en del af Det Europæiske System af Centralbanker, ikke kun analyserer det finansielle marked i Ungarn og Irland.
With reference to the reply given to my question on the necessary protection of customers and users of financial services (E‑003927/2011), in quoting a report from the Banco de España I was aware that the scope of its analysis was limited to the Spanish financial services market.
Rapportens indhold er imidlertid også relevant for det finansielle marked i Europa.
After all, this institution — although a member of the European System of Central Banks — is not in the habit of conducting studies solely concerning the Hungarian or Irish markets.
EU‑Domstolen har gentagne gange mindet om behovet for at analysere virkningen af priserne på EU‑plan og ikke kun i de enkelte medlemsstater.
Nonetheless, the data in the report is indeed relevant for the European market as a whole, since, as the Court of Justice of the European Union has noted on many occasions, the effect and repercussions of prices in a given country must be analysed both on its market and in the wider European context.
Dette skal netop ses i lyset af konsolideringen af det indre marked.
This is the precisely what consolidation of the single market means.
Kommissionen bedes derfor besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
I therefore insist in asking the Commission: 1.
Agter Kommissionen ikke at undersøge, om de omtalte gebyrtakster er i overensstemmelse med princippet om lige store gebyrer som fastsat i forordning (EF) nr. 924/2009 af 16. september 2009 om regulering af grænseoverskridende betalinger? 2.
Does it not intend to take steps to verify whether these commission charges are in accordance with the principle of equal treatment enshrined in Regulation (EC) No 924/2009 of 16 September 2009 on cross-border payments in the Community? 2.
Hvorledes forholder Kommissionen sig til bankernes praksis med at øge gebyrtaksterne?
What is its view of this case of banks unilaterally raising charges?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-007230/2011
Question for written answer E-007230/2011
Kommissionens svar på skriftlig forespørgsel P‑2093/2010 betragtes dog som rent skrivebordsarbejde.
The answer I received from the Commission was, if I may say so, nothing short of bureaucratic (P‑2093/2010).
Agter Rådet i den forbindelse at opfordre medlemsstaterne til at afholde sig fra at anvende de bureauer, der har et sagsanlæg ved den amerikanske domstol, og som ifølge en rapport udarbejdet af den amerikanske kongres sidste år har spillet en afgørende rolle i forbindelse med det økonomiske sammenbrud og det finansielle kaos?
Does the Council intend to instruct the Member States not to employ agencies which are currently facing legal proceedings in the US and which even the US Congress has referred to, in a report published last year, as ‘essential cogs in the wheel of financial destruction’ and key tools of financial chaos?
Mener Rådet ikke, at det af forsigtighedshensyn er nødvendigt, at medlemsstaterne ikke indgår aftaler med disse bureauer, før de igangværende retssager er afsluttet?
Does the Council consider it necessarily prudent for Member States to refrain from engaging said firms until these legal proceedings are concluded?
Agter Rådet at opfordre medlemsstaternes offentlige organer til at tilbageholde oplysninger om vurderingen af de offentlige gældsudstedelser, som er udarbejdet af de tre amerikanske kreditvurderingsbureauer?
Does the Council intend to instruct the public authorities of the Member States to refrain from announcing or publicising the ratings received from these three US credit-rating agencies when offering sovereign debt instruments for sale?
Den 21. juli 2011 erklærede stats- og regeringscheferne i euroområdet og EU‑institutionerne, at »afhængigheden af ekstern kreditvurdering i EU's lovgivningsmæssige bestemmelser bør reduceres under hensyn til de nylige forslag fra Kommissionen i den henseende« http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ecofin/123979.pdf , herunder det forventede forslag om kreditvurderingsbureauer.
On 21 July 2011 the Heads of State or Government of the Euro Area and EU institutions stated that ‘reliance on external credit ratings in the EU regulatory framework should be reduced, taking into account the Commission's recent proposals in that direction’ http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ecofin/123979.pdf , including the expected proposal on credit rating agencies.
På denne baggrund har Rådet allerede modtaget Kommissionens lovgivningsforslag til forordning om tilsynsregler for kreditinstitutter og investeringsselskaber 13284/11. samt et forslag til direktiv om adgang til at udøve virksomhed som kreditinstitut og om tilsyn med kreditinstitutter og investeringsselskaber 13285/11. (»KKD IV«-pakken).
Against this background, the Council has already received the Commission legislative proposal for a regulation on Prudential Requirements for credit institutions and investment firms 13284/11. as well as a proposal for a directive on the access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms 13285/11. (the ‘CRD IV’ package).