natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Medlemmer af præsidiet i det congolesiske parlament blev bestukket til at fjerne den tidligere parlamentsformand.
Members of the Bureau of the Congolese Parliament were bribed to oust the former speaker of parliament.
Da dette ikke hjalp, blev andre parlamentsmedlemmer bearbejdet.
When that did not help, other MPs were worked on.
I mellemtiden har den congolesiske præsident ændret de forfatningsmæssige bestemmelser til, at der kun skal gennemføres én valgrunde ved næste præsidentvalg, så han er sikker på at blive genvalgt.
In the meantime, the Congolese President has made constitutional changes which mean that there will only be one round in the forthcoming presidential elections and he will undoubtedly be re-elected.
Demokrati i Congo er én stor afledningsmanøvre.
Democracy in Congo is one big sham.
Hvor stort et beløb ydede Kommissionen til finansiering af det forrige præsidentvalg i Congo?
What sum did the Commission provide to finance the previous presidential elections in Congo?
Hvor mange penge vil Kommissionen pumpe i det kommende præsidentvalg i 2012?
How much money will the Commission be pumping into the forthcoming presidential elections in 2012?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med ovennævnte artikler?
Is the Commission aware of the above reports?
Er disse udemokratiske fremgangsmåder, som udspringer direkte fra den congolesiske præsidents nærmeste omgivelser, i strid med samfundspagten med Congo?
Do these undemocratic practices, which emanate from the immediate entourage of the Congolese President, constitute a violation of the governance contract with Congo?
I bekræftende fald, hvilke konsekvenser har dette for EU's udviklingsbistand?
If so, what consequences will this have for European development aid?
Hvordan falder en finansiering af præsidentvalget i 2012 i tråd med den nævnte ændring i de forfatningsmæssige bestemmelser?
How can the financing of the presidential elections in 2012 be reconciled with constitutional changes of this kind?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003073/2011
Question for written answer E-003073/2011
Om: EU‑bistand til de palæstinensiske områder
Subject: European aid for the Palestinian territories
Kan Kommissionen oplyse mig om, hvor stor europæisk finansiel støtte der er ydet til Palæstina i 2010?
Could the Commission inform me of how much European financial assistance went to the Palestinian territories in 2010?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003074/2011
Question for written answer E-003074/2011
Siden 2005 har Etiopien tydeligvis langsomt udviklet sig til et diktatur.
Since at least 2005, Ethiopia has degenerated into a full-blown dictatorship.
Under en stor demonstration mod regeringen i november 2005 blev mere end 200 personer skudt ned og dræbt, og 30 000 havnede bag lås og slå.
During a large anti-government demonstration in November 2005, more than 200 people were shot dead and 30 000 imprisoned.
Men trods denne alvorlige forværring af menneskerettighedssituationen forøges udviklingsbistanden til landet yderligere.
Yet despite this dramatic deterioration in the human rights situation, development aid to the country has repeatedly been increased.
I perioden 2004‑2008 blev bistanden minsandten fordoblet.
In the period 2004‑08, the volume of aid actually doubled.
I 2008 fik Etiopien mindst 3,3 mia. USD i udviklingsbistand, hvoraf USA hostede op med ca. 800 mio. USD og EU i omegnen af 400 mio. USD.
In 2008 Ethiopia received the princely sum of USD 3.3 billion in development aid, with the USA coughing up some USD 800 m and the EU approximately USD 400 m.
Da jeg i en tidligere skriftlig forespørgsel af 17. september 2007 spurgte, hvordan alle disse EU‑midler kontrolleres, svarede den tidligere kommissær for udviklingsbistand, at der er indført diverse tilsynsmekanismer, som sikrer, at bistanden anvendes til det påtænkte formål (E‑4007/07).
When I inquired in a previous parliamentary question dated 17 September 2007 how the use made of all this European money was monitored, the former Commissioner for Development replied that all manner of strict monitoring systems were in place to ensure the proper use of funds (E‑4007/07).
Intet er imidlertid mindre rigtigt.
However, nothing could be further from the truth.
I oktober 2010 oplyste menneskerettighedsorganisationen Human Rights Watch, at den etiopiske regering i stort omfang og helt systematisk anvender udviklingsbistand til at bekæmpe politiske afvigere ved at gøre adgang til bistandsprogrammerne afhængig af støtte til det regerende parti.
In October 2010 the organisation Human Rights Watch stated that the Ethiopian Government was using development aid on a large scale and systematically to repress political dissidence by making access to these programmes conditional on support for the ruling party.
Rapporten er én lang liste med fakta, der tyder på et systematisk misbrug af udviklingsmidler (Human Rights Watch, »Development without freedom: how aid underwrites repression in Ethiopia« (Hvordan bistand garanterer undertrykkelse i Etiopien), 18. oktober 2010).
The report is one long catalogue of facts indicating systematic abuse of development funding (Human Rights Watch, ‘Development without freedom: how aid underwrites repression in Ethiopia’, 18 October 2010).
Er Kommissionen enig i resultaterne i ovennævnte rapport?
Can the Commission endorse the findings of this report?
I bekræftende fald, agter Kommissionen da at standse udviklingsbistanden til Etiopien eller i det mindste (for en dels vedkommende) suspendere den?
If so, will the Commission terminate development aid to Ethiopia or at least suspend all or part of it?
Står Kommissionen stadig bag den hypotese, som den tidligere kommissær for udviklingsbistand fremførte om, at der er indført strenge tilsynsmekanismer?
Does the Commission still uphold the statement by the former Commissioner for Development that strict monitoring systems are in place?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003075/2011
Question for written answer E-003075/2011
Om: Korruption i Verdenssundhedsfonden
Subject: Corruption affecting the Global Health Fund
End ikke de finansielle midler i Verdenssundhedsfonden synes sikre mod korruption.
Even funding provided under the Global Health Fund is proving not to be safe from corruption.
Denne donordarling blev etableret i 2002 som reaktion på det uhåndterlige FN‑bureaukrati og er en slags finansieringsinstrument, der hurtigt skal kunne yde støtte til sundhedsprogrammer til bekæmpelse af aids, malaria og tuberkulose i udviklingslande.
This fund, which is the darling of donors, was set up in 2002 in response to complaints about cumbersome UN bureaucracy, and is a form of funding mechanism designed to enable money to be channelled swiftly into health programmes to combat AIDS, malaria and TB in developing countries.
Fonden skal råde over næsten 22 mia. USD.
The fund apparently has almost USD 22 billion at its disposal.
Forskere har opdaget, at to tredjedele af disse penge er gået op i røg på grund af korruption.
Researchers have discovered that two-thirds of this money has vanished into thin air as a result of corruption.
Årsagen skal findes i ikkeeksisterende eller mangelfuld finanskontrol hos støttemodtagerne, nærmere bestemt hos afrikanske ministerier for folkesundhed, hvis budgetter kraftigt understøttes af fonden.
The reason this is the absence of, or gaps in, financial controls on the part of recipients of aid, in particular African health ministries, which receive significant budget support from the fund.
Således blev det i slutningen af december 2010 oplyst, at der på ulovlig vis er forsvundet 4 mio. USD i Mali.
At the end of December 2010 it came to light that USD 4 million had been misappropriated in Mali.
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte rigtigheden af ovennævnte artikel?
Can the Commission confirm that this report is correct?
I bekræftende fald, hvor mange penge har Kommissionen allerede pumpet ind i denne fond?
If so, how much money has the Commission already pumped into this fund?
Agter Kommissionen at standse betalingerne til denne fond eller i det mindste suspendere dem?
Does the Commission intend to stop, or at least suspend, payments to this fund?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003076/2011
Question for written answer E-003076/2011
Om: Tvangsudsættelser af flygtninge i Ingusjetien
Subject: Forcible evictions of refugees in Ingushetia
Den 28. februar 2011 besluttede myndighederne i Republikken Ingusjetien, at størstedelen af de flygtningelejre, der eksisterer i republikken, skulle nedlægges her til foråret.
On 28 February 2011, the authorities in Ingushetia took a decision to close, by this spring, most of the refugee camps situated within the Republic.
På nuværende tidspunkt er der 29 lejre, mens kun fire får lov at blive.
There are currently 29 camps, but only 4 will remain after the closures.
I henhold til myndighedernes forordning fik indbyggerne i en af disse lejre, som ligger på et kaserneområde i Gamurzievskidistriktet, den 3. marts ordre til at forlade deres huse i løbet af 10 dage.
In line with the authorities’ decision, the residents of one camp situated in barracks in the district of Gamurziev were told to leave their homes within 10 days.
Myndighederne har imidlertid ikke stillet de lovede barakker til rådighed for flygtningene, og de har heller ikke fået tilbudt nogen alternative erstatningsboliger.
The authorities, however, had failed to make available the barracks the refugees had been promised, nor was any alternative housing proposed.
De har derimod fået en advarsel om, at hvis de ikke frivilligt efterlever myndighedernes ordre, vil politiet blive tilkaldt.
The refugees were warned that if they did not acquiesce to the authorities’ demands, the police would be called.
Ofrene for tvangsudsættelserne er ingusjetiske familier, som under den ossetisk-ingusjetiske konflikt i 1992 blev tvunget til at forlade deres landsbyer i egnen omkring Prigorodnyj.
The victims of these forced evictions will be Ingush families who had to leave their villages during the Ossetian-Ingush conflict in the Prigorodny district in 1992.
Siden da er der gået mere end 18 år, men flygtningene bor stadig i lejrene og kan ikke vende tilbage til Prigorodnyj.
Now, 18 years on, the refugees are still living in camps and are unable to return to Prigorodny.
Deres hjem er blevet revet ned, og de har endnu ikke modtaget nogen form for kompensation for deres tabte ejendom.
Their homes have been destroyed and they have so far received no compensation for the loss of their property.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003078/2011
Question for written answer E-003078/2011
Om: »Hul« i de offentlige finanser i Portugal
Subject: Discovery of a ‘hole’ in Portugal's public finances
Ifølge oplysninger i den tyske avis Financial Times Deutschland har Kommissionen og Den Europæiske Centralbank (ECB) i forbindelse med en teknisk delegation i Lissabon for to uger siden fundet et hul i de portugisiske offentlige finanser.
The German newspaper Financial Times Deutschland has reported that during the course of a technical mission to Lisbon two weeks ago, the Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) found a ‘hole’ in Portugal's public finances.
Er det muligt at sætte tal på det omtalte »hul« i de portugisiske offentlige regnskaber?
Is it possible to quantify the size of the hole in Portugal's public accounts?
Ved den, hvad der kan have forårsaget denne situation i betragtning af, at den portugisiske regering for nylig oplyste, at budgetgennemførelsen forløb glat?
Does the Commission know what has given rise to this situation, given that the Portuguese Government only recently claimed that budgetary implementation was running smoothly?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003079/2011
Question for written answer E-003079/2011
Ifølge Center for Rights and Freedom forekom der en række uregelmæssigheder uden fortilfælde under præsidentvalget i 2008 i Armenien, herunder krænkelse af menneskerettighederne og de grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder samt overdreven magtudøvelse fra myndighedernes side.
According to the organisation Centre for Rights and Freedom, the 2008 presidential elections in Armenia were characterised by a number of unprecedented irregularities, including violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms and excessive use of force by the authorities.
Den 1. marts det år bekræfter organisationen, at et angreb mod den armenske befolkning dekreteret af myndighederne og med ulovlig deltagelse af hæren førte til mindst 10 dødsfald.
On 1 March 2011 this centre reported that an attack on the Armenian people, decided by the authorities and with the illegal participation of the army, had resulted in at least ten deaths.
Hvad er Kommissionens holdning hertil, og hvilke foranstaltninger har den truffet, eller agter den at træffe, i forbindelse med de nævnte forhold?
If so, what is its position and what action has been or will be taken by it on the matter?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003080/2011
Question for written answer E-003080/2011
Om: Sikkerheden på spanske atomkraftværker
Subject: Safety at Spanish nuclear power stations
En række miljøorganisationer i Spanien, såsom Greenpeace, Ecologistas en Acción og WWF/Adena, modsætter sig foranstaltningerne bebudet af den spanske industriminister, Miguel Sebastián, som efter atomkatastrofen i Japan nu foreskriver en revision af sikkerhedssystemerne på atomkraftværker i hele landet.
A number of Spanish environmental associations, including Greenpeace, Ecologists in Action and WWF/Adena, have expressed their opposition to the measures announced by the Spanish Minister for Industry, Miguel Sebastián, who has proposed, in the wake of the nuclear disaster in Japan, a review of the safety systems at all the nuclear power stations in Spain.
Har den kendskab til muligheden for sådanne huller i sikkerheden i de reaktorer, der anvendes i Spanien?
Is the Commission aware of these deficiencies in the safety systems used for Spain's reactors?
I betragtning af at det efter hændelserne i Fukushima står klart, at reaktorerne har en lav modstandskraft over for problemer i kølesystemet, ville det da ikke være oplagt at stressteste de spanske reaktorer?
In view of the low resistance of the reactors to cooling problems evidenced by the Fukushima events, does the Commission not believe it is obviously necessary to carry out resistance tests on Spain's reactors?
I betragtning af, at de spanske atomkraftværker ligger tæt på grænsen til Portugal, har Kommissionen da kendskab til en fælles plan de to lande imellem for så vidt angår foranstaltninger til civilbeskyttelse i tilfælde af en atomulykke i Spanien?
Given the proximity of Spanish nuclear reactors to the border with Portugal, is the Commission aware of the existence of any joint plan involving the two countries for civil protection measures in the event of a nuclear accident in Spain?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003081/2011
Question for written answer E-003081/2011
Om: Kronisk syges adgang til lægemidler
Subject: Availability of medicines for the chronically ill
Eftersom adgangen til lægemidler er livsvigtig for patienter med kroniske sygdomme, agter Kommissionen så at udarbejde europæiske bestemmelser om disse patienters adgang til lægemidler og lægetjenester?
Given that access to these medicines is vital for the chronically ill, does the Commission intend to draw up a European regulation concerning access to medicines and treatments?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003082/2011
Question for written answer E-003082/2011
Om: Vådområdet »Huerta de las Pilas« i Cortijo San Bernabé, ALGECIRAS — CÁDIZ
Subject: The ‘Huerta de la Pilas’ wetlands, San Bernabé, Algeciras, Cadiz
Hidtil er dokumentationen ønsket af ornitologkollektivet den sorte stork (COCN) i maj og juli 2010 fra det andalusiske vandagentur og miljømyndigheden i forbindelse med miljøovervågningsprogrammet på et projekt, hvor Albero de la Bahía S.A. skulle drive minearbejde under åben himmel i »Cortijo de San Bernabé« i 2003, ikke blevet udleveret.
To date, the COCN, an association for the protection of the black stork in Spain, has still not received the information it requested from the Andalusian Water Agency and the Regional Department of the Environment about the implementation of an environmental monitoring plan for an open-cast mining project in the San Bernabé area drawn up 2003 by the company Albero de la Bahía S.A.
COCN mener, at det er en overtrædelse af otte punkter i DIA.
The COCN believes that eight points of the environmental impact statement have been breached.
Det er derfor muligt at gennemføre en restaureringsplan, således at lagunen beholder de egenskaber, der gør, den kan huse flora og fauna som normalt findes i denne type økosystemer.
This would open up the possibility of drawing up a restoration plan with a view to maintaining the lagoon so that it retains the features that wetland flora and fauna require.
Området huser en attraktion af kulturel interesse (Abrigo de Huerta de las Pilas) og en arkæologisk forekomst, som skal beskyttes, indtil det bliver en del af den historiske arv (Cortijo San Bernabé).
The area contains a site of cultural interest (Abrigo de Huerta de las Pilas) and an archaeological site that is protected, pending the granting of historical heritage status (Cortijo San Bernabé).
I juli 2010 begyndte myndighederne i Algeciras arbejdet med at omklassificere jord, der ikke var inddelt i sektorer, i Cortijo til byområde, idet man ville omdanne vådområdet til losseplads.
In July 2010, Algeciras city council began the process to reclassify the non-sectored land designated for development in the area as urban land with a view to converting the wetlands into a dump.
Forundersøgelsen er lavet af den virksomhed, der ikke overholdt restaureringsplan af 2003, og som vil komme uden om problemet her otte år efter.
The blueprints for this project were drawn up by the company that failed to comply with the restoration plan of 2003 and that is trying to settle the issue eight years down the line.
Mener Kommissionen, at den slags holdninger beskytter de europæiske borgeres ret til miljøinformation, til miljøet generelt, til den kulturelle arv og til at bevare borgernes sundhed?
Does the Commission take the view that such attitudes uphold the rights of European citizens to obtain environmental information, as well as their rights to the environment in general, to cultural heritage and to public health?
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe for at undgå dette magtmisbrug og denne manglende koordinering mellem myndighederne i EU's medlemslande?
What steps does the Commission intend to take to counter this abuse of power and lack of administrative coordination in EU Member States?
Hvilke foranstaltninger kan Kommissionen træffe for andre lignende tilfælde af kunstige vådområder i samme situation?
What steps is the Commission intending to take to address similar cases of artificial wetlands in which the same conditions apply?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003083/2011
Question for written answer E-003083/2011
Om: Nedgradering af de græske bankers kreditværdighed
Subject: Downgrading of the creditworthiness of Greek banks
Kreditvurderingsbureauet »Moody's« foretog den 9. marts 2011 en nedvurdering af kreditværdigheden hos seks græske banker, heriblandt den græske nationalbank og Alpha Bank.
On 9 March 2011, Moody's, the credit rating agency, downgraded the credit rating of six Greek banks, including the National Bank of Greece and Alpha Bank.
Denne beslutning truffet af Moody's blev offentliggjort to dage efter agenturets nedvurdering af de græske statsobligationer.
This decision of Moody's was announced two days after it had downgraded Greek Treasury bonds.
Alpha Bank meddelte i en pressemeddelelse den 14. marts 2011 forøgelsen af den amerikanske banks deltagelsesprocent i bankens aktiekapital, som nu beløber sig til 5,1 %.
On 14 March 2011, Alpha Bank issued a press release announcing an increase in the U.S. bank Morgan Stanley's share of its equity capital, which now stands at 5.1 %.
Det fremgår endvidere af meddelelsen fra Alpha Bank, at »Morgan Stanley har handlet både som ledende rådgiver for den græske nationalbank (ETE) i forbindelse med det uopfordrede fusionsforslag fra ETE til Alpha Bank, hvilket ETE karakteriserede som venligt stemt, og ligeledes som en medadministrator af de forskellige tilbud i forbindelse med forøgelsen af ETE's aktiekapital fra september 2010«.
As Alpha Bank states elsewhere: ‘Morgan Stanley has acted, inter alia , both as principal adviser to the National Bank of Greece (NBG) in respect of the unsolicited merger proposal from the NBG to Alpha Bank of 18 January 2011, which the NBG described as friendly, and also as co-managers of the book-built offerings for increasing NBG's share capital in September 2010’.
Rejser der sig ifølge Kommissionens vurdering et spørgsmål om misbrug af den amerikanske banks status som rådgiver for den græske nationalbank på grundlag af de interne oplysninger denne lå inde med under forhandlingerne? —
Does it consider that there is an issue of abuse of position by the U.S. bank, as adviser to the National Bank, on the basis of insider information to which it became privy during negotiations? —
Hvad er Kommissionens vurdering af, at det amerikanske kreditvurderingsbureau Moody's meddelte sin beslutning om nedgradering af bl.a. den græske nationalbank og Alpha Bank kun få dage efter, at forhandlingerne om fusionen strandede, og at den ledende rådgiver for nationalbanken og aktionær med en øget andel er Morgan Stanley, ligeledes en bank med amerikanske interesser?
How does it view the fact that the U.S. rating agency Moody's announced its decision to downgrade the National Bank of Greece and Alpha Bank, among others, only a few days after merger negotiations had failed, bearing in mind that Morgan Stanley is the chief adviser to the NBG and a shareholder with an increased share in Alpha Bank, and also represents US interests?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003084/2011
Question for written answer E-003084/2011
Om: Foderkrise i svinekødssektoren
Subject: Feed crisis in the pigmeat sector
Set i lyset af den ekstremt omfattende og hurtige anvendelse af EU's Forvaltningskomité for Korns ordning for hjælp til privat oplagring inden for svinekødssektoren, som lukkede den 22. februar, og dens EU‑kvote, som er blevet opbrugt på blot 21 dage, har Kommissionen da overvejet at genåbne ordningen?
Given the extremely large and rapid uptake of the EU Cereals Management Committee’s scheme for aid to private storage for the pigmeat sector, which closed on 22 February, its EU‑wide quota having filled in just 21 days, has the Commission considered re-opening the scheme?
Omkostningerne til produktion af færdigt svinekød er steget markant siden juni 2010.
The cost of production of the finished pig has risen substantially since June 2010.
Prisen på kompositfoder er steget fra 233 EUR pr. ton i juni til 304 EUR i januar 2011.
Composite feed prices have spiralled from EUR 233 per tonne in June to EUR 304 in January 2011.
Dette svarer til en stigning i omkostningerne til foder pr. solgt svin på ca. 20,60 EUR eller 26 cents pr. kilo slagtekrop.
This equates to a rise in the cost of feed per pig sold of circa EUR 20.60 or 26 cents per kg carcass.
Men i Irland ligger udbyttet for januar 2011 2‑3 cents under junipriserne på 141 cents.
Yet in Ireland the price return for January 2011 is 2-3 cents below June prices of 141 cents.
Stigningen i foderpriserne skyldes en markant reduktion i verdens produktion af kornafgrøder i 2010, navnlig i store hvedeeksporterende lande som Rusland, Ukraine og Kasakhstan.
The feed price increase is due to a severe reduction in the world’s cereal crop output in 2010, especially in major wheat exporting countries such as Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan.
Hvilke skridt agter Kommissionen at tage set i lyset af ovenstående med henblik på at afhjælpe den aktuelle foderkrise inden for svineproduktionen?
With reference to the above, what steps will the Commission take to alleviate the current feed crisis in pig production?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-003085/2011
Question for written answer E-003085/2011
Om: Plejere i Progress-programmet
Subject: Carers in the Progress programme