natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
På denne måde vil EFSF og dermed også eurolandene få ubegrænset adgang til friske penge fra euroseddelbanken.
In this way the EFSF and therefore also the Euro area countries would obtain unlimited access to fresh money from the ECB
Hvordan forholder Kommissionen sig til den problematik, at ethvert underskud dermed kan dækkes, og at presset for spareforanstaltninger forsvinder?
How does the Commission view the problem that in this way every deficit can be covered and consequently the pressure for austerity measures is lost?
Hvordan forholder Kommissionen sig til den deraf følgende krænkelse af forbuddet mod direkte statsfinansiering fra ECB's side?
What is the Commission's opinion of the resulting infringement of the ban on direct state funding by the ECB?
Hvilke andre varianter er endnu under drøftelse?
What other options are still under discussion?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008974/2011
Question for written answer E-008974/2011
Om: Aftaleret inden for Fællesskabet
Subject: Intra-Community contract law
Jeg har en vælger, der er genbrugskonsulent og leverer og udlejer genbrugsmaskiner i Det Forenede Kongerige.
I have a constituent who is a recycling consultant and who supplies and hires out recycling machinery in the UK.
De maskiner, han opererer med, er fremstillet i Tyskland.
The machines he operates are manufactured in Germany.
Der er en virksomhed i Det Forenede Kongerige, som har en salgs- og marketingaftale/kontrakt med producenten.
There is a company in the UK which has a sales and marketing agreement/contract with the manufacturer.
Min vælger har forsøgt at købe nye maskiner og reservedele fra andre forhandlere i Europa, og de nægter at sælge ham maskiner og dele på grund af denne kontrakt.
My constituent has tried to buy new machines and spare parts from other dealers in Europe and they refuse to sell him machines and parts due to this contract.
Det er hans opfattelse, at han er berettiget til at henvende sig til en forhandler i Europa og købe nye maskiner og reservedele, hvis han ønsker dette.
His understanding is that he is entitled to go to a dealer in Europe and buy new machines and spare parts if he so wishes.
Kan Kommissionen redegøre for, om hans opfattelse er korrekt? —
Could the Commission please clarify whether his understanding is correct? —
Hvilken information kan Kommissionen give som støtte for hans sag og for at gøre det muligt for ham at købe maskiner og reservedele fra producenter i Europa?
What information can you provide to allow him to support his case and to enable him to buy machines and spare parts from manufacturers in Europe?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008975/2011
Question for written answer E-008975/2011
Om: Dyremishandling i Tordesillas: »El Toro de la Vega« (tyren fra sletten)
Subject: Animal abuse in Tordesillas: El Toro de Vega
I år blev der kastet spyd mod den i næsten en halv time.
This year, the bull was stabbed for almost half an hour.
I år, da tyren var faldet om, forsøgte man først at dræbe den med en skruetrækker og et par minutter efter, mens den endnu var levende og led, forsøgte man at dræbe den med kniv.
Having fallen to the ground, participants first tried to kill it with a screwdriver before attempting, a few minutes later, to kill it with a knife, at which point the poor animal was still alive.
Aktivisterne, der forsøgte at fotografere og filme eller at vise deres modstand mod denne grusomme begivenhed, blev truet.
The activists who tried to take photos or demonstrate their opposition to such an act of cruelty were intimidated.
En kvinde på 46 år blev anholdt, efter at en større gruppe af deltagerne havde forsøgt at lynche hende.
A 46- year-old woman was detained after suffering an attempted lynching, carried out by a significant part of the crowd.
Vi ved, at Kommissionen forsvarer og fremmer dyremishandling, idet den mener, at mishandling i forbindelse med kultur- og sportsbegivenheder bør være beskyttet, hvilket den giver udtryk for i flere af sine svar, som f.eks. P-5603/09 .
We know that the Commission defends and promotes the torturing of animals, as indicated in its various responses, for example in answer P‑5603/09, as it is considered that in cultural or sporting events, such torture should be protected.
Forventer Kommissionen på et tidspunkt at ændre sin nuværende holdning, hvor den forsvarer tortur og mishandling af dyr i begivenheder som »El Toro de la Vega«?
Does the Commission anticipate at some point changing its current position of defending the torture and abuse of animals at events such as El Toro de Vega?
Kan Kommissionen konkretisere, hvorfor den anser »El Toro de la Vega« for en kultur- og sportsbegivenhed?
Can the Commission specify why it considers El Toro de Vega a sporting or cultural event?
Personerne, der forsøger at fotografere og filme, plejer også at blive udsat for overgreb og vold.
People who try to take photos are also often intimidated or victimised.
Agter Kommissionen heller ikke at garantere retten til informationsfrihed, og vil den fortsat forsvare begivenheder, hvor de personer, der forsøger at opnå billedmateriale som vidnesbyrd af hvilken som helst slags, bliver forfulgt, bortvist og pint?
Does the Commission also not aspire to protect the right to freedom of information, and will it carry on defending an event where people trying to gather graphic evidence of whatever kind are persecuted, removed or even hurt?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008976/2011
Question for written answer E-008976/2011
Om: Arbejdsfri dag den 3. juni 2011
Subject: 3 June 2011 as a bridging day
Den 3. juni 2011, dagen efter den kristne helligdag Kristi himmelfartsdag, blev der kun opretholdt en slags vagttjeneste i diverse EU‑institutioner.
On 3 June 2011, the day after the Christian feast of the Ascension, several EU institutions operated on an on-call basis only.
I Parlamentets årlige mødekalender (se http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdf/general/cal2011.pdf) var den 3. juni 2011 planlagt som en normal arbejdsdag.
On Parliament’s annual calendar of meetings, however, 3 June 2011 is marked as a normal working day (see http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdf/general/cal2011.pdf).
I lyset af at den 3. juni 2011 blev erklæret for arbejdsfri for forskellige EU‑institutioner, var Rådet og dets arbejde da også berørt heraf? 2.
Given that 3 June 2011 was treated as an office closing day at various EU institutions, to what extent were the Council and the Council’s work affected?
Er der for årene 2011‑2015 bekendtgjort andre dage, der er erklæret for arbejdsfrie for Rådet?
Are there any more bridging days between now and 2015 which have been declared office closing days for the Council?
Det er korrekt, at den 3. juni 2011 var en arbejdsfri dag for medarbejderne i Den Europæiske Unions institutioner, herunder Rådet, som det fremgår af listen over fridage i 2011, som blev offentliggjort i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende af 24. september 2009 EUT C 230 af 24.9.2009, s. 10.
The 3rd of June 2011 was indeed an office closing day for the staff of the European Union institutions, including the Council, as stated in the Public Holidays Schedule for 2011, published in the Official Journal of the European Union of 24 September 2009 OJ C 230, 24.9.2009, p.
Listen er vedlagt til det ærede medlems orientering. .
10, attached for the information of the Honourable Member. .
I henhold til artikel 61 i personalevedtægterne udarbejder kollegiet af administrationschefer for institutionerne efter høring af Vedtægtsudvalget hvert år en liste over fridage, herunder helligdage.
On the basis of Article 61 of the Staff Regulations, a list of office closing days including public holidays is drawn up each year by the college of the heads of administration of the institutions, after consultation of the Staff Regulations Committee.
Rådets aktiviteter tilrettelægges i overensstemmelse med denne liste.
The activities of the Council are scheduled in line with this list.
I mødekalenderen, som findes på Rådets websted, kan det ærede medlem se, at der ikke var planlagt møder den 3. juni.
The Honourable Member will see that in the calendar of meetings, accessible on the Council's Internet website, no meetings were scheduled for 3 June.
I aktivitetskalenderen for det ungarske formandskab, som også findes på Rådets websted, fremgår det ligeledes, at fredag den 3. juni var en fridag.
Moreover, in the calendar of activities of the Hungarian Presidency, equally accessible via the Council's Internet website, Friday 3 June is marked as a non-working day.
Medarbejdere med eksempelvis sikkerhedsrelaterede opgaver, som arbejder på skiftehold, eller medarbejdere, som er på vagt i weekenden, var naturligvis på arbejde eller på tilkaldevagt ifølge planen og ifølge almindelig praksis for alle weekender og helligdage.
Staff with e.g. security-related tasks working in shifts or staff on call during weekends were of course on duty/on call as planned and as on every weekend or holiday.
Kollegiet af administrationschefer har godkendt listerne over fridage for Den Europæiske Unions institutioner for 2012 og 2013.
The college of the heads of administration has approved the public holidays schedule for the European Union institutions for 2012 and 2013.
Begge lister er vedlagt til det ærede medlems orientering. .
Both schedules are attached for the information of the Honourable Member. respectively.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008977/2011
Question for written answer E-008977/2011
Om: Gennemførelse af EU's asylret i Italien
Subject: Transposition of EU asylum law in Italy
Migranterne bliver til dels ikke tilbudt de minimumsydelser som indkvartering og mad, der er fastlagt af EU.
Some of the migrants are not even provided with the minimum benefits laid down in EC law, such as food and accommodation.
Siden foråret 2011 har adskillige tyske forvaltningsdomstole udskudt tilbagesendelsen af asylansøgere til Italien i henhold til Dublinreglerne på grund af landets tilsidesættelse af EU's minimumsstandarder og menneskerettighederne (jf. bl.a. VG Freiburg 1 A 1 K 117/11, VG Bremen 6 V 368/11.A, VG Gießen 1 L 198/11.GI.A, VG Darmstadt 4 L 1889/10.DA.A, VG Gelsenkirchen 5a L 576/11.A, VG Augsburg Au 6 S 11.30264, VG Düsseldorf 5 L 1096/11.A, VG Düsseldorf 21 L 1127/11.A, VG Magdeburg 9 A 346/10).
Since spring 2011 a number of administrative courts in Germany have deferred the return of asylum‑seekers to Italy in accordance with the Dublin regulations, as a result of the country’s failure to comply with minimum EU standards and human rights (see, inter alia , the following administrative court cases: Freiburg 1 A 1 K 117/11, Bremen 6 V 368/11.A, Gießen 1 L 198/11.GI.A, Darmstadt 4 L 1889/10.DA.A, Gelsenkirchen 5a L 576/11.A, Augsburg Au 6 S 11.30264, Düsseldorf 5 L 1096/11.A, Düsseldorf 21 L 1127/11.A, Magdeburg 9 A 346/10).
Hvordan vil Kommissionen sikre gennemførelse af eksisterende lovgivning, overholdelse af EU's minimumsstandarder og udstedelse af visa i overensstemmelse med Schengenaftalens ånd i Italien?
How does the Commission intend to ensure the implementation of existing law, compliance with minimum EU standards and the visa issue in the spirit of the Schengen Agreement in Italy?
Har Kommissionen planer om at indlede en traktatbrudssag mod Italien?
Does the Commission intend to open infringement proceedings against Italy?
Hvorfor har Kommissionen endnu ikke truffet foranstaltninger mod den manglende gennemførelse og derved tolereret dette retsbrud?
Why has the Commission taken no action so far against non-implementation, thereby accepting the infringement?
Hvordan retfærdiggør Kommissionen den omfattende udvidelse af minimumsgarantierne for asylansøgere, som den har planer om og som der forhandles om i øjeblikket, i lyset af at nogle medlemsstater ikke er i stand til at overholde de aktuelle minimumsstandarder?
How does the Commission justify the considerable increase in minimum guarantees for asylum‑seekers which it is planning and which is currently being negotiated, given that some Member States are not able to comply with the current minimum standards?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008978/2011
Question for written answer E-008978/2011
Om: Schengeninformationssystemet II
Subject: Second-generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
Som led i rådsmødet (justitsministrene og ministrene for indre anliggender) den 22./23. september 2011 erklærede Kommissionen, at der nu også var tekniske og personalemæssige ressourceflaskehalse i det centrale system (C.SIS), hvorfor den såkaldte etapemålstest 2 ligeledes kunne blive forsinket.
At the Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting of 22-23 September 2011 the Commission stated that the central system (C.SIS) was being hampered by a dearth of technical and human resources and the second milestone test might consequently be held up.
Derudover var der forsinkelser forårsaget af de nationale systemer.
Furthermore, delays were occurring as far as national systems were concerned.
Hvordan begrunder Kommissionen sine repræsentanters udtalelser af 31. maj 2011 om, at der i særdeleshed ikke var flaskehalsproblemer på personalesiden, og at SIS II-personale ikke ville blive fjernet eller indsat andetsteds?
Can the Commission explain why its representatives, speaking on 31 May 2011, maintained that there were no staff shortages and no SIS II personnel had left or been deployed elsewhere?
Hvilke indvirkninger har disse forsinkelser på den globale tidsplan for SIS II i lyset af den stramme tidsplan, manglen på bufferperioder og den gensidige tekniske afhængighed af udviklinger?
What effect are these delays having on the SIS II global schedule, bearing in mind that the schedule is tight, there is little in the way of buffer time, and, from the technical point of view, developments are mutually dependent?
Hvilke indvirkninger har disse forsinkelser på de nødvendige midler til SIS II i indeværende regnskabsår og i 2012?
What effects are these delays having on the appropriations required for SIS II in the current financial year and in the year 2012?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008979/2011
Question for written answer E-008979/2011
Om: Mærkning af fødevarer — dybfrosset fersk kød
Subject: Labelling of food — frozen meat
Ifølge supermarkedskæden Lidl er man hverken i henhold til EU‑lovgivningen eller østrigsk lovgivning forpligtet til at mærke kødvarer, som har været dybfrosset før bearbejdning.
According to the company ‘Lidl’, there is neither an obligation on an EU level, nor according to Austrian law, to label meat products that were frozen before being processed as such.
I østrigske kølediske kan man således undertiden finde henvisningen »fremstillet af optøet kød« trykt med småt på bagsiden af emballagen.
Thus products found on supermarket shelves in Austria are sometimes found to contain the information ‘made from fresh meat’ in small print on the back of the packet.
Det, som forbrugerne i første omgang opfatter som fersk kød, er de facto slet ikke så friskt.
What the consumer then takes at a first glance to be fresh meat is in fact not so fresh.
Optøede fødevarer kan ganske vist tilberedes og fryses ned igen bagefter, men det går det ud over kvaliteten, hver gang de bliver tøet op.
Indeed defrosted food products can be prepared and then refrozen, however every time they are defrosted, some of the quality is lost.
Desuden kan de kim, som findes i alt kød, formere sig igen efter optøning, og de bliver først dræbt fuldstændigt under den stærke opvarmning ved tilberedningen.
As well as this, the bacteria that are present in all meat multiply again once the meat has been defrosted and are only completely killed off after being heated at a high temperature.
Eksperter anbefaler under alle omstændigheder at gennemstege eller gennemvarme kødet helt, før det fryses ned igen.
Experts recommend cooking meat through properly before freezing it again.
Er det korrekt, at der på EU‑plan virkelig ikke er pligt til at mærke optøet kød?
Is there really no obligation on an EU level to label meat that has already been defrosted?
Hvis ja, har Kommissionen da ingen betænkeligheder med hensyn til kimbelastningen, når kødprodukter solgt som fersk kød i virkeligheden består af optøet kød og bliver frosset ned igen af intetanende forbrugere?
If yes, does the Commission not have concerns about germ levels in meat products that are sold as fresh meat, that in actual fact consist of defrosted meat, and that are then refrozen by unsuspecting customers?
Er der planer om en bedre mærkning af kødprodukterne?
Are there plans for a more precise labelling system for meat products?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008980/2011
Question for written answer E-008980/2011
Om: Skadedyrs immunitet over for genmajs
Subject: Pest immunity to genetically modified maize
I starten af september 2011 fik verdens største producent af genetisk modificeret såsæd, Monsanto, ophævet Frankrigs forbud mod genmajs i en sag ved EU‑Domstolen.
At the beginning of September 2011 the world’s largest producer of genetically engineered seed, Monsanto, overturned the French ban on genetically modified maize by bringing an action before the Court of Justice.
I den forbindelse kritiserer eksperter gang på gang, at genetisk modificerede sorter generelt godkendes som ufarlige, men at der efterfølgende ofte bliver påvist sundhedsskadelige virkninger.
Experts repeatedly criticise the fact that genetically modified varieties are authorised, because they are generally considered to be safe, but are often shown after the event to be damaging to health.
I tvivlstilfælde går godkendelsesprocedurerne koncernens vej.
In authorisation procedures the manufacturer is given the benefit of the doubt.
Det viser sig igen og igen, at de angiveligt immune planter bestemt er sårbare over for skadedyrsangreb.
Time and time again it turns out that allegedly resistant plants are most definitely vulnerable to pest attacks.
Det viste sig f.eks. at være tilfældet med Monsanto-bomuld i Indien.
One example of such a case was Monsanto cotton in India.
Også i forhold til den majssort, som blev markedsført i 2003 og skulle være immun over for biller af arten Chrysomela, har skadedyrene tilsyneladende udviklet en resistens over for plantens toksiner i løbet af seks år.
In another case, involving a maize variety first marketed in 2003, which was supposed to be resistant to beetles of the genus Chrysomela , the pests apparently developed resistance to the plant toxins within six years.
På trods af de dyre genetisk modificerede frø må landmændene nu også anvende pesticider.
This means that, for all the expensive biotech seeds, farmers have to use pesticides as well.
Hvordan forholder Kommissionen sig til beskyldningen om, at vurderingerne fra Den Europæiske Fødevaresikkerhedsautoritet (EFSA) er irrelevante, når dens sagkyndige har tætte forbindelser til gmo-industrien?
How does the Commission respond to the accusation that opinions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) are worthless when the authority’s experts have close links to the genetic engineering industry?
Hvilke konsekvenser drages der på EU‑plan af, at skadedyr er immune over for genetisk modificerede planter, og af de dermed forbundne merbelastninger som følge af den ekstra pesticidanvendelse?
What action is being taken at EU level in view of pest immunity to genetically engineered plants and the resulting higher costs incurred in the additional use of pesticides?
Findes der undersøgelser af de sundhedsmæssige følger af kombinationen af genetisk modificeret såsæd og pesticider?
Do any studies exist on the possible health effects of genetically modified seed and pesticides in combination?
Hvis nej, er der da planer om sådanne undersøgelser?
If not, are there plans to conduct studies on that subject?
I hvilken udstrækning bliver der taget hensyn til eksisterende toksiner i genetisk modificerede planter ved beregningen af pesticidgrænseværdier?
When pesticide limit values are calculated, to what extent are toxins in genetically modified plants factored in?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008981/2011
Question for written answer E-008981/2011
I EU kan man stadigvæk finde løbebokse inden for svineavl.
There are still parts of the European Union where stalls are used in pig rearing.
Ifølge EU‑lovgivningen er løbebokse fortsat tilladt i de første fire uger efter bedækning og den sidste uge før forventet faringstidspunkt.
EC law continues to allow pig farmers to keep sows in individual stalls in the first four weeks after covering and the final week before the expected date of farrowing.
Dvs. at ca. 100 kg tunge søer frister en tilværelse i 70 cm brede og 1,90 m lange metalbure.
Animals that weigh approximately 100 kg are thus spending their days in metal cages measuring 0.7 x 1.9 m.
Nogle EU‑lande har nu sat en stopper for løbebokse, mens andre, herunder Østrig, fortsat påberåber sig gældende EU‑lovgivning.
Some EU Member States have already prohibited the use of stall housing but others, including Austria, have not — basing their stance on the applicable EC law.
Har EU planer om at stramme EU‑lovgivningen på området?
Are there plans for the introduction of stricter EU rules in this regard?
Overvejes det fra EU's side at udarbejde en almengyldig dyrevelfærdslovgivning i EU?
Is the EU considering drawing up Union-wide rules on animal welfare?
Hvis ja, hvordan ser tidsplanen herfor ud?
If so, what is the likely timescale?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008982/2011
Question for written answer E-008982/2011
Frem til udgangen af 2010 havde Tyskland således opbygget tilgodehavender hos eurosystemet på 326 mia. EUR, og Grækenlands, Irlands, Portugals og Spaniens samlede forpligtelser over for eurosystemet udgjorde 340 mia. EUR.
Thus, by the end of 2010 Germany had accumulated claims worth EUR 326 billion against the euro system, while the aggregate liabilities of the GIPS countries — Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain — towards the system totalled EUR 340 billion.
Da Europas centralbanker fortsat tilhører nationalstaterne, og de kun har overflyttet visse aktiviteter til Den Europæiske Centralbank, som de har oprettet i fællesskab, er Target-tilgodehavenderne samtidig udtryk for de respektive nationalstaters tilgodehavender og forpligtelser.
Because the central banks of the EU countries still belong to the respective Member States and have transferred only some of their activities to the European Central Bank, which they jointly established, the Target balances constitute both claims and liabilities for the respective states.
De forrentes med ECB's refinansieringssats, som forretningsbankerne kan erhverve kreditter fra ECB til i form af nye midler.
The rate of interest they carry is the main ECB refinancing rate, at which commercial banks can obtain credit in the form of newly issued money from the ECB.
Target-tilgodehavenderne har været ukendte længe, fordi de ikke er opført i ECB's regnskab.
The Target balances went unrecognised for quite some time because they do not appear on the ECB’s balance sheet.
Omfanget af de kreditter, som Tyskland (og andre lande med positive Target-tilgodehavender) har ydet Grækenland, Irland, Portugal og Spanien via Target-systemet, overstiger langt de officielle støttemidler, som EU's lande har udbetalt til kriselandene hidtil.«
The volume of lending by Germany (and the other countries with plus balances in the Target system) to the GIPS countries far exceeds the total to date of the officially declared EU support for countries hit by the debt crisis.
Kan Target2‑tilgodehavenderne sammenlignes med kortfristede eurobonds?
Are the Target2 balances comparable to short-term Eurobonds?
Mener Kommissionen, at »de støttekreditter, som EU officielt har vedtaget, kun er halvt så store som de kreditter, der stilles til rådighed via centralbankernes betalingssystem«?
Does the Commission agree that the volume of the financial support officially earmarked by the EU governments for the GIPS countries is only half that of the credit already extended to them via the central banks’ payment system?