natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Direktivet specificerer eller definerer imidlertid på ingen måde, hvad der forstås ved et lille eller mellemstort forsikringsselskab.
The directive does not specify or give any definition of what is meant by a small or medium-sized insurance undertaking.
For selskaber, som traditionelt har en lille kundekreds, udfører mindre transaktioner og har en lavere risikoprofil, er den konkrete gennemførelse af proportionalitetsprincippet af stor betydning.
For companies which traditionally have a smaller client base, perform smaller transactions and have a lower risk profile, the precise way in which the proportionality principle is to be implemented in practice is very important.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvordan den præcist vil gennemføre proportionalitetsprincippet, og hvordan den vil undtage små og mellemstore forsikringsselskaber fra uforholdsmæssigt tilsyn, når den ved, at de nye bestemmelser kan føre til en reduktion af antallet af markedsaktører og dermed til en svækkelse af markedet?
Could the Commission therefore clarify how, precisely, it intends to implement the proportionality principle and how it intends to prevent small and medium-sized insurance companies from being subject to disproportionate supervision, bearing in mind that the new rules could lead to a smaller number of market players and therefore a shrinking of the market?
Hvordan skal EIOPA og de nationale tilsynsorganer fordele tilsynsopgaven mellem sig?
How is the task of supervision to be shared between EIOPA and the national supervisory authorities?
Hvordan vil Kommissionen sikre lige konkurrencevilkår, hvad angår tilsyn med forsikringsselskaber, hvis den ene aktør er underkastet tilsyn af den medlemsstat, på hvis marked han er aktiv, og den anden aktør på det samme marked er underkastet tilsyn af en anden medlemsstat?
How does the Commission intend to ensure a ‘level playing field’ in terms of supervision of insurers, if one market player is subject to supervision by the Member State in whose market it operates and another market player operating within the same market is subject to supervision by a different Member State?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008048/2011
Question for written answer E-008048/2011
Om: Spørgsmål vedrørende bistand til Sydafrika
Subject: Granting of aid to South Africa
Den amerikanske ambassade i Sydafrika har opfordret sine statsborgere til at lade sig registrere, så de kan holdes informeret om den aktuelle voldstrussel i landet, navnlig i forbindelse med den offentlige retsproces mod ANC ungdomslederen Malema http://southafrica.usembassy.gov/acs_warden_20111030.html. .
The American embassy in South Africa has urged US citizens to register with it in order to be kept informed about the current threat of violence in the country, specifically in connection with the trial of the head of the ANC Youth League, Malema, which is being held in public http://southafrica.usembassy.gov/acs_warden_20111030.html .
Ambassaden konstaterer, at der finder en hastig forværring af det politiske klima sted i Sydafrika, navnlig over for hvide.
The embassy notes that the political climate in South Africa is rapidly deteriorating, particularly in relation to whites.
Samtidig bliver navnlig hvide journalister ofte i alvorlig grad forhindret i at udøve deres funktion som repræsentanter for den frie presse http://www.beeld.com/Suid-Afrika/Nuus/Joernalis-dien-klag-in-na-polisielede-haar-glo-aanrand-20110822. .
White journalists in particular are also regularly being seriously hindered from performing their role as representatives of a free press http://www.beeld.com/Suid-Afrika/Nuus/Joernalis-dien-klag-in-na-polisielede-haar-glo-aanrand-20110822 .
EU har sammen med Sydafrika underskrevet et »landestrategidokument« om udviklingshjælp for perioden 2007‑2013, hvor opretholdelse af social stabilitet er en vigtig bestanddel.
The EU has drawn up with South Africa a ‘country strategy paper’ for development cooperation over the period 2007‑13, an important aspect of which is maintaining social stability.
Der er også øremærket et samlet beløb på 980 mio. EUR til »social samhørighed«.
A total of EUR 980 million has been allotted for social cohesion http://eeas.europa.eu/south_africa/index_en.htm .
Agter Kommissionen at standse denne »udviklingsbistand«?
Does the Commission intend to stop this ‘development aid’?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008051/2011
Question for written answer E-008051/2011
Resultaterne af forskningsprogrammet SAL (støttet af Kommissionen med 1 394 998 EUR) blev sammenfattet i publikationen »Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe«.
The results of the SAL research programme (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 1 394 998) are summarised in the brochure entitled ‘Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe’.
Gav forskningen ny indsigt, der var nyttig og relevant for politikken på området?
Has this research provided any new, relevant insights which can be used in policy making?
I bekræftende fald hvilken?
If so, what are they?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008052/2011
Question for written answer E-008052/2011
Om: »Accept Pluralism«
Subject: Accept Pluralism
I forskningsprogrammet »Accept Pluralism« (støttet af Kommissionen med 2 601 430 EUR) undersøgte man bl.a. sprogbrugen i forbindelse med homoseksualitet og antisemitisme.
The research programme ‘Accept Pluralism’ (which receives support from the Commission to the tune of EUR 2 601 430) conducts studies on topics including the use of language to discuss homosexuality and anti-Semitism.
Udgør muslimer i den forbindelse en særlig undersøgelsesgruppe?
Do Muslims constitute a specific group for study in this field?
Inden for rammerne af dette program undersøgt man også »groups or individuals or political parties that are against democracy, express illiberal values, supporting violence or racism«.
Research is also carried out under this programme on ‘groups or individuals or political parties that are against democracy, express illiberal values, supporting violence or racism’.
Hvilke konkrete grupper, enkeltpersoner og partier drejer det sig om, i hvert af de undersøgte lande?
Which are the specific groups, individuals and parties in question in each of the countries studied?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008053/2011
Question for written answer E-008053/2011
Resultaterne af forskningsprogrammet EDUMIGROM (støttet af Kommissionen med 1 291 892 EUR) blev sammenfattet i publikationen »Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe«.
The results of the Edumigrom research programme (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 1 291 892) are summarised in the brochure entitled ‘Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe’.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008054/2011
Question for written answer E-008054/2011
Resultaterne af forskningsprogrammet EMILIE (støttet af Kommissionen med 1 294 800 EUR) blev sammenfattet i publikationen »Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe«.
The results of the Emilie research programme (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 1 294 800) are summarised in the brochure entitled ‘Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe’.
I den omtalte publikation anvendes udtrykket »multicultural demos«.
In this brochure we encounter the term ‘multicultural demos’.
Hvad forstås ved denne faktiske selvmodsigelse?
What is this contradiction in terms intended to mean?
Tilslutter Kommissionen sig det argument (formuleret i punkt 4 i afsnittet »Political rights and naturalisation«), at indvandrere, der ikke stammer fra Den Europæiske Union, skal have almindelig stemmeret i den medlemsstat, hvor de opholder sig?
Does the Commission support the argument (stated in point 4 of the section entitled ‘Political rights and naturalisation’) that non-EU foreign nationals should have the right to vote in municipal elections in their Member State of residence?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008055/2011
Question for written answer E-008055/2011
Resultaterne af forskningsprogrammet EUROETHOS (støttet af Kommissionen med 639 399 EUR) blev sammenfattet i publikationen »Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe«.
The results of the Euroethos research programme (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 639 399) are summarised in the brochure entitled ‘Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe’.
Hvilken ny indsigt gav forskningsarbejdet?
What new, relevant insights has this research yielded?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008056/2011
Question for written answer E-008056/2011
Resultaterne af forskningsprogrammet REDCO (støttet af Kommissionen med 1 188 492 EUR) blev sammenfattet i publikationen »Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe«.
The results of the REDCO research programme (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 1 188 492) are summarised in the brochure entitled ‘Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe’.
Gav forskningen ny indsigt, der var nyttig og relevant for politikken på området?
Has this research yielded any new, relevant insights which can be used in policy making?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008057/2011
Question for written answer E-008057/2011
Et af målene med forskningsprogrammet RELIGARE (støttet af Kommissionen med 2 699 943 EUR) er bekæmpelse af negationisme.
One of the objectives of the Religare research programme (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 2 699 943) is to combat denialism.
Tyrkiet var et af de lande, der blev behandlet.
Turkey is among the countries covered by this research programme.
Er bekæmpelsen af den tyrkiske stats negationisme vedrørende det armenske folkemord også et af målene med forskningsarbejdet?
Is combating the Turkish state’s denialism regarding the Armenian genocide also one of the programme’s objectives?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008058/2011
Question for written answer E-008058/2011
Resultaterne af forskningsprogrammet REVACERN (støttet af Kommissionen med 800 000 EUR) blev sammenfattet i publikationen »Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe«.
The results of the Revacern research programme (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 800 000) are summarised in the brochure entitled ‘Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe’.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008059/2011
Question for written answer E-008059/2011
Resultaterne af forskningsprogrammet REMC (støttet af Kommissionen med 828 842 EUR) blev sammenfattet i publikationen »Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe«.
The results of the REMC research programme (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 828 842) are summarised in the brochure entitled ‘Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe’.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008060/2011
Question for written answer E-008060/2011
Resultaterne af forskningsprogrammet WAVE (støttet af Kommissionen med 1 295 000 EUR) blev sammenfattet i publikationen »Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe«.
The results of the WAVE research programme (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 1 295 000) are summarised in the brochure entitled ‘Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe’.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008061/2011
Question for written answer E-008061/2011
Resultaterne af forskningsprogrammet VEIL (støttet af Kommissionen med 1 204 440 EUR) blev sammenfattet i publikationen »Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe«.
The results of the VEIL research programme (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 1 204 440) are summarised in the brochure entitled ‘Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe’.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008062/2011
Question for written answer E-008062/2011
Om: MUSOMED, FACIT og IMISCOE
Subject: Musomed, FACIT and Imiscoe
Resultaterne af forskningsprogrammet MUSOMED (støttet af Kommissionen med 1 291 892 EUR), FACIT (1 495 980 EUR) og IMISCOE (4 600 000 EUR) blev sammenfattet i publikationen »Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe«.
The results of the research programmes Musomed (which receives funding from the Commission to the tune of EUR 353 201), FACIT (EUR 1 495 980) and Imiscoe (EUR 4 600 000) are summarised in the brochure entitled ‘Pluralism and religious diversity, social cohesion and integration in Europe’.
Gav forskningen ny indsigt, der var nyttig og relevant for politikken på området?
Have these research programmes yielded any new, relevant insights which can be used in policy making?
I bekræftende fald, hvilken er der tale om, for hver forskningsdel?
If so, what are they (please state for each programme)?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008063/2011
Question for written answer E-008063/2011
Om: Losseplads til affald, der indeholder asbest, i lokaliteten Retorto (provinsen Cremona)
Subject: Landfill site containing asbestos in Retorto (Cremona)
Regionen Lombardiet, der er indehaver af de fornødne tilladelser, har aldrig taget højde for de moderne og billige teknologier baseret på termisk neutralisering af asbest.
The Lombardy Region, which holds the necessary licences, has never taken into consideration the modern, economical technologies relating to the thermal inertisation of asbestos.
Den koncessionshavende virksomhed, som har købt området til den abnorme pris af 3 mio. EUR uden ophævelsesklausul, har været involveret i flere undersøgelser vedrørende underleverancer, der i det skjulte blev tildelt til virksomheder af tvivlsom oprindelse.
The concessionary company, which bought the area for the abnormal figure of three million euro, without any get-out clause, has been involved in a number of investigations concerning surreptitious subcontracting to companies of dubious origin.
Er lossepladsen i det pågældende tilfælde det mest bæredygtige system for området ud fra en videnskabelig, teknologisk og økonomisk synsvinkel? —
whether, in this case, the landfill site is the most sustainable system for the area from a scientific, technological, economic and environmental point of view; —
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008069/2011
Question for written answer E-008069/2011
Om: Et netværk af nationale antidopingorganisationer
Subject: Network of national anti-doping bodies
I hvidbogen om idræt (KOM/2007/0391) noterede Kommissionen behovet for og intentionen om at fremme en koordineret indsats fra EU's side i kampen mod doping, f.eks. ved at støtte et netværk af nationale antidopingorganisationer.
In its White Paper on sport (COM(2007)391) the Commission indicated that it was necessary to seek a coordinated EU approach to the prevention of doping, for example by supporting a network of national anti-doping bodies and announced its intention of adopting this policy.
På hvilke andre måder, foruden den nævnte, agter Kommissionen at bistå medlemsstaterne eller at tage nye initiativer på baggrund af artikel 165 i TEUF om bekæmpelse af doping?
In what ways, apart from the above, will it assist Member States or take new initiatives under Article 165 TFEE to combat doping?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008070/2011
Question for written answer E-008070/2011
Om: Produktionsskoler og finansieringsmuligheder
Subject: Production schools and possible funding
Et af de midler Østrig har taget i brug til at bekæmpe ungdomsarbejdsløsheden er produktionsskoler, som har til formål at bringe de unge, der har forladt skolen eller har forladt deres læreplads, eller som har særlige vanskeligheder, der kræver særlig støtte, tilbage i uddannelsessystemet.
One of the measures that Austria is taking to combat youth unemployment involves production schools, which are targeted at young people who have dropped out of school or apprenticeships, or who have specific problems requiring specific support, with the aim of reintegrating them into the education and training system.
Kan Kommissionen give flere oplysninger om disse skoler?
Can the Commission provide further information on these production schools?
(Henvender de sig f.eks. til alle aldersgrupper eller kun til unge voksne?
For example, do they cater for all ages or only for young people over 18?
Afsluttes de med en eksamen på studentereksamensniveau, som giver adgang til de videregående uddannelser?). —
Do they lead to the acquisition of a higher certificate of secondary education giving access to higher education? —
I hvilken udstrækning er Den Europæiske Socialfond med til at finansiere driften af skoler i Grækenland?
To what extent does the ESF co-finance the running of schools in Greece?
Kan de specialskoler, som findes i landet, opnå yderligere støtte fra det eksisterende finanspolitiske program (2007‑2013)?
What further support can be provided for second-chance schools in Greece over and above the existing budgetary programme 2007‑13?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008071/2011
Question for written answer E-008071/2011
Om: EU's indsats i forhold til spilleragenternes virksomhed
Subject: EU action with regard to the activities of players' agents
Ifølge hvidbogen om idræt (KOM/2007/0391) havde Kommisionen til hensigt at gennemføre en evaluering for at skabe klarhed over spilleragenternes virksomhed i EU og for at kunne vurdere, om der er behov for en indsats på EU‑plan.
According to the White Paper on Sport (COM(2007)391), the Commission planned to carry out an assessment designed to provide a clear overview of the activities of players' agents in the EU and an evaluation of whether action needed to be taken at EU level.
Hvad agter Kommissionen efter evalueringen at gøre på EU‑plan for at sikre, at spilleragenternes virksomhed i EU er i overensstemmelse med loven? —
Following that assessment, what action will the Commission take at EU level to monitor the legality of the activities of players’ agents in the EU? —
I betragtning af, at medlemsstaterne har forskellige lovgivninger, som regulerer agenternes funktion og arbejdsforhold, hvordan påtænker EU da at bistå medlemsstaterne med at sikre gennemsigtighed i agenternes forretninger og i transferen af spillere?
Given the different legal frameworks governing the operation and employment status of agents in the different Member States, how will the Commission help Member States to ensure transparency in the dealings of agents and in player transfers?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008072/2011
Question for written answer E-008072/2011
Om: Foranstaltninger mod utilsigtet forurening af produkter fra genetisk modificerede organismer
Subject: Measures to prevent unintended contamination of products by genetically modified organisms
Økologisk honning i Bayern endte med at blive en mutant som følge af forurening af genetisk modificeret majs.
Organic honey in Bavaria underwent alteration following contamination by genetically modified corn.
Et tilstødende jordstykke, hvor der blev dyrket genetisk modificeret maj af typen ΜΟΝ810 til forskningsformål, viste sig at ligge til årsag for forureningen.
The cause of the contamination was traced to a nearby plot of land, where genetically modified corn of the type MON810 was being cultivated for research purposes.
Producenten har ført et søgsmål mod delstaten Bayern.
The producer brought proceedings against the State of Bavaria.
I betragtning af at Kommissionen i juli 2010 har udsendt en simpel henstilling til medlemsstaterne med henblik på at træffe nationale foranstaltninger til at undgå en utilsigtet forekomst af genetisk modificerede organismer i konventionelle og økologiske afgrøder, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
Bearing in mind that in July 2010 the Commission issued a recommendation to the Member States on national measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMO in conventional and organic crops, will it answer the following: 1.
Hvordan vil Kommissionen kommentere den tyske domstols afgørelse?
What view does the Commission take of the ruling of the German court?
Er Kommissionen enig i, at denne afgørelse skaber nye retlige standarder for dyrkningen af genetisk modificerede organismer i de lande inden for EU, hvor dette er tilladt? 2.
Does it agree that the decision creates a new legal situation as regards the cultivation of genetically modified organisms, where these are allowed in the EU Member States? 2.
Har forbrugerorganisationer i tilsvarende tilfælde ret til at gøre en kollektiv indsats for at beskytte kvaliteten af produkter mod en potentiel forurening med genetisk modificerede produkter? 3.
In such cases, do consumer associations have a right to bring collective action in order to safeguard the quality of products which may have been contaminated by GMO? 3.
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen til hensigt at træffe med henblik på effektivt at håndtere risikoen for utilsigtet forurening af produkter fra genetisk modificerede organismer?
What measures will the Commission take to effectively tackle the risk of unintended contamination of products by GMO?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008073/2011
Question for written answer E-008073/2011
Om: Støtte til små og mellemstore virksomheder og til privatpersoner til tilbagebetaling af lån
Subject: Subsidies for small and medium-sized enterprises and private individuals for the repayment of loans
De enorme hjælpepakker på mange mia. euro i form af garantier og lignende, som de græske banker har modtaget, har ikke formået at skabe tilstrækkelig likviditet til at sætte nyt liv i økonomien.
The extensive package of aid amounting to tens of billions of euros in the form of guarantees and other support given to Greek banks have not succeeded in providing sufficient liquidity with which to revitalise economic activity.
De lån, som bankerne yder til den græske økonomi, står ikke i forhold til den hjælp, de modtager, og det er en givet kendsgerning, at de ikke er tilstrækkelige til at udvikle den økonomiske aktivitet.
The loans granted by banks to the Greek economy do not match the assistance they have received, and at all events it is quite certain that they are not sufficient to ensure the development of the economy.
På baggrund af dette problem bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
In view of this problem, can the Commission answer the following questions: 1.
Hvorfor bliver en del af den likviditet, som tilflyder bankerne i form af incitamenter såsom tilskud, ikke kanaliseret direkte til små og mellemstore virksomheder og til private låntagere, så de kan tilbagebetale en del af eller hele det lån, de har optaget? 2.
Why is part of the liquidity provision for banks not channelled directly to small and medium-sized enterprises and private borrowers in the form of incentives, such as subsidies, to enable them to repay part or all of the loans that they have taken out? 2.
Ville en sådan handling over for de små og mellemstore virksomheder og de private låntagere ikke mangedoble bankernes likviditet — ud over den lettelse, det ville bringe låntagerne?
Would such a measure targeted at SMEs and private borrowers not boost bank liquidity, as well as providing relief for borrowers?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008074/2011
Question for written answer E-008074/2011
Om: Kommissionens sagsanlæg i forbindelse med offentligt støtte til lufthavne i Tyskland
Subject: Commission's aid procedures in connection with publicly funded airfields in Germany
Tilskud fra delstaterne til udbygning eller vedligeholdelse af lufthavne kan betragtes som statsstøtte i medfør af EF‑traktatens artikel 87ff.
Funding from German Länder for the development or maintenance of airfields can be classed as state aid pursuant to Article 87 ff of the EC Treaty.