natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Berlin‑konferencen om chartret, afholdt den 4.–5. juni i år, har ligeså forstærket skepsissen over for en alt for global tilgang til dette politikområde.
The conference on the Charter which took place in Berlin on 4 and 5 June 2007 also voiced further doubts about an unduly general approach to these policies.
Har Kommissionen tænkt sig at følge mere intensivt op på gennemførelsen af SMV‑chartret, sådan som den tidligere har gjort?
Does the Commission plan to step up the monitoring of the implementation of the Charter, as it did in the past?
Findes der nye initiativer til fordel for små virksomheder og af en sådan beskaffenhed, at små virksomheder på ny kan bibringes det indtryk, at Kommissionen tager hensyn til deres interesser?
Are new initiatives being taken in favour of small enterprises that will make such companies feel once again that they matter to the Commission?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5440/07
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5440/07
Om: Tidsplan for udbetaling af erstatning fra Den Europæiske Solidaritetsfond til brandhærgede områder i Grækenland
Subject: Schedule of European Solidarity Fund compensation payments to fire-damaged areas in Greece
Der er nu gået over to måneder siden de ødelæggende brande i sommers.
Over two months have elapsed since the disastrous fires which occurred last summer.
Indbyggerne i de græske brandramte områder lever fortsat i frygt, fordi brandfaren er efterfulgt af en trussel i form af eventuelle oversvømmelser og jordskred.
The inhabitants of the affected areas in Greece fear that their troubles are not yet over, the danger of fire having been succeeded by the threat of flooding and landslides.
På baggrund af nødvendigheden af omgående at stille de disponible midler til rådighed til udbedring af skaderne bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende: 1.
Given the need for the immediate release of available funds to offset the damage sustained, can the Commission provide the following information: 1.
Har Kommissionen fastlagt en tidsplan for udbetaling af erstatningerne fra Solidaritetsfonden til de brandramte områder i Grækenland? 2.
Has it decided on a schedule of European Solidarity Fund compensation payments for fire-damaged areas in Greece eligible for such assistance? 2.
Har den truffet beslutning om, hvilke foranstaltninger og aktioner, der i første omgang skal prioriteres ved finansieringen? 3.
Has it decided on the measures and actions to receive priority funding? 3.
Agter Kommissionen — og i givet fald hvordan — at fremskynde de tidskrævende procedurer, der er nødvendige for godkendelse og udbetaling af støtten fra EU's Solidaritetsfond?
Does it intend to expedite the time-consuming procedures necessary for approval and payment of European Solidarity Fund assistance and if so, how?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5441/07
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5441/07
Da samarbejdet ikke fungerede, tilegnede den mexicanske virksomhed sig flere dusin kraner til en værdi på 15 mio. EUR.
When their cooperation failed, the Mexican firm claimed several dozen cranes, valued at EUR 15 million.
Senere tilegnede den sig også provenuet af anvendelsen, således af gælden til Sarens‑gruppen løber op i adskillige millioner.
Since then, the Mexican firm has also appropriated the revenue from their use, as a result of which the debts of the Sarens Group now run into millions.
Sarens‑gruppen anmoder Kommissionen om politisk støtte og beskyttelse, fordi dette mexicanske eventyr trækker ud.
The Sarens Group is requesting political support and protection from the Commission because this Mexican adventure is dragging on.
Hvis Mexico fortsat vil tiltrække investorer fra Europa, må landet beskytte EU‑borgernes personlige integritet.
If Mexico wishes to continue to attract investors from Europe, it must protect the personal integrity of EU citizens.
EU agter at rejse spørgsmålet på det kommende møde i Det Blandede Udvalg EU-­Mexico.
The EU intends to raise the issue at the forthcoming EU-Mexico Joint Committee.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5452/07
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5452/07
(31. oktober 2007)
(31 October 2007)
Om: Overtrædelse af direktiv 2004/38/EF
Subject: Infringement of Directive 2004/38/EC
Direktivet skulle have været gennemført senest den 30. april 2006, så regeringen har ikke overholdt fristen for gennemførelsen og har dermed gjort sig skyldig i forsinket gennemførelse.
The directive was supposed to be transposed into domestic law by 30 April 2006, but the government failed to meet the deadline and consequently was guilty of belated transposition.
Lovdekretet er blevet kritiseret, fordi det ikke gennemfører direktivet korrekt, som således forbliver uigennemført.
The legislative decree has been criticised for failing to transpose the directive properly, and is de facto inapplicable.
Under henvisning til Domstolens afgørelser, hvorefter det for at vurdere, om en stat overtræder EU‑lovgivningen, er nødvendigt at efterprøve, om EU‑lovgivningen og ikke blot gennemførelseslovgivningen finder korrekt anvendelse, anser Kommissionen det da ikke for hensigtsmæssigt at minde regeringen om, at den skal overholde direktivet samt ændre den gældende lovgivning?
In view of the case law of the Court of Justice, according to which, for the purpose of assessing whether a state is in breach of EU legislation, it must be ascertained whether the EU legislation — and not just the implementing legislation — is being applied correctly, does the Commission agree that it should urge the government to comply with the directive and amend the current legislation?
Den italienske indenrigsminister har indrømmet, at lovdekret nr. 30 bør tages op til revision, da det ikke er korrekt gennemført.
The Minister of Home Affairs himself has admitted that Dlgs 30 should be revised, acknowledging that the law is not being implemented properly.
Ministeriet har med henblik herpå fastlagt, at der skal indføjes bestemmelser i forbindelse med sikkerhedspakken, der er til drøftelse i Ministerrådet.
The Ministry has proposed that additional provisions should be added in connection with the security package currently being discussed in the Council of Ministers.
Vil Kommissionen hurtigst muligt se på disse bestemmelser for at vurdere, om de er i overensstemmelse med direktivet og om nødvendigt indlede en overtrædelsesprocedure?
Will the Commission urgently assess those measures in order to ascertain whether they are compatible, and in compliance, with the directive and will it, if need be, initiate infringement proceedings?
Vil Kommissionen kontrollere, om bestemmelserne om udsendelse, som følge af manglende opfyldelse af betingelserne fastlagt i direktivet, er blevet korrekt gennemført, nemlig selvstændigt arbejde, ansættelse, tilstrækkelige finansielle midler til, at personen ikke er til last for det sociale system og sygeforsikring, bl.a. fastlagt i dekretets artikel 7 og 9, stk. 3, men rent faktisk aldrig anvendt, i den stat, hvor man opholder sig i over tre måneder?
Will the Commission check whether those provisions are duly enforced which relate to expulsion on the grounds of a person's failure to fulfil the conditions laid down in the directive, namely that he is a worker or a self-employed person and has sufficient resources not to become a burden on the social assistance system, or failure to have sickness insurance cover (as specified, also, in Articles 7 and 9 of the legislative decree, which has never been applied in practice) in the State in which he is residing for more than three months?
Bestemmelserne i direktivet vedrørende overholdelsen af opholdsbetingelserne bliver således ikke gennemført.
The provisions of the directive which relate to compliance with residence conditions are not applied in practice.
I cirkulære nr. 2 af 28. december 2006 bekendtgøres det, at aftalerne vedrørende indvandring pr. 1. januar 2007 ikke finder anvendelse for rumænske og bulgarske statsborgere (lovdekret nr. 286/­98, http://www.altalex.com/index.php?idnot=836) samt præsidentens dekret af 18. januar 2002 nr. 54, der kun fastlægger udsendelse på grund af forstyrrelse af den offentlige orden, den offentlige sikkerhed og den offentlige sundhed, idet det således ikke sikrer overholdelsen af de andre betingelser, der gælder for borgeren.
Circular No 2 of 28 December 2006 states that, from 1 January 2007, the legislation applying to Romanian and Bulgarian citizens is no longer the consolidated law on immigration (legislative decree Dlgs 286/98, http:www.altalex.com/index.php?idnot=836) but presidential decree DPR 54 of 18 January 2002, which makes provision for expulsion only on the grounds of public order or public health and safety, and so does not ensure compliance also with the other conditions imposed on citizens.
Cirkulæret henviser endvidere ikke til direktivet, da dekretet endnu ikke var udstedt på trods af udløbet af fristen for gennemførelsen.
Moreover, the circular does not refer to the directive, as the decree had not yet been issued despite the fact that the deadline for transposition had already expired, a serious omission.
Forskellige kilder bekræfter endvidere, at den bestemmelse, der er indføjet i sikkerhedspakken, kun fastsætter udsendelse på grund af forstyrrelse af den offentlige orden og offentlige sikkerhed uden derved at sikre overholdelsen af de andre ovennævnte betingelser over for den borger, der opholder sig over tre måneder i landet (tilstrækkelige finansielle midler, arbejde osv.), som direktivet kræver overholdt.
Various sources confirm, moreover, that the provisions included in the package of security measures provide for expulsion only on the grounds of public order and public safety without, therefore, requiring citizens residing in the country for over three months also to comply with the other abovementioned conditions (possession of adequate financial resources and a job, etc.) as specified in the directive.
Vil Kommissionen henvende sig til den italienske regering i betragtning af spørgsmålets betydning og nødvendigheden af, at Italien overholder EU‑retten på et område, der har indvirkning over for andre stater?
In view of the importance of this issue and the need for Italy to comply with EC law in a sector which has implications for other Member States, will the Commission issue a warning to the government?
Mener Kommissionen, at det er tilstrækkeligt, at regeringen bare lover at tage dekretet op til revision, og at Italien allerede i lang tid har overtrådt EU‑retten klart?
Does the Commission agree that mere promises on the part of the Government to revise the decree are not enough, and that Italy has clearly been in breach of EU legislation for some time now?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5453/07
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5453/07
Om: Isolering og sundhedsproblemer i Warszawa og Bydgoszcz for en varetægtsfange, som er udleveret fra Nederlandene efter polsk anmodning
Subject: Solitary confinement and health problems on remand, in Warsaw and Bydgoszcz, of a prisoner extradited by the Netherlands on the basis of a Polish request for legal assistance
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at nederlænderen Robern Hörchner, som følge af en polsk anmodning om udlevering fra 2001 og i modstrid med en foreløbig afgørelse fra retten i Amsterdam af 8.6.2007, den 4.10.2007 blev udleveret til Polen på grund af en mistanke mod en forretningsforbindelse i 90'erne?
Is the Commission aware that on 4 October 2007, on the basis of a Polish request in 2001 for legal assistance and contrary to an interlocutory order of 8 June 2007 by the Amsterdam court, Robert Hörchner, a Dutch national, was extradited to Poland because of suspicions against a business partner in the 1990s?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at den indsatte den 9. oktober 2007 modtog besøg i fængslet i Warszawa af en repræsentant fra den nederlandske ambassade, hvor det bl.a. blev konstateret, at han om dagen næsten ikke får noget at drikke (kun te om morgenen) og derved bliver dehydreret, at fængselslægen har inddraget hans medicinforråd til 4 eller 5 måneder, at han i dagevis ikke har fået noget af denne medicin, og at der ikke var noget vand til at skylle medicinen ned med, at det på grund af opholdets korte varighed (overførsel til varetægtsfængsling i Bydgoszcz frem til den 31.12.2007) og den deraf følgende manglende mulighed for i fængslet at åbne en art bankkonto ikke var muligt for ham selv at købe drikkevand, og at han havde indtryk af, at han blev behandlet ringere end de øvrige fanger, der taler polsk?
Is the Commission aware that that prisoner was visited in Warsaw jail on Tuesday, 9 October 2007 by a representative of the Netherlands Embassy, when it was found inter alia that he is being given hardly anything to drink each day (only tea in the morning), and is becoming dehydrated as a result, that his supply of medicine, sufficient for four to five months, has been confiscated by the prison doctor, who gives him none for days at a time, that there was no water with which to take the medicine, that because he was there only for a short period of detention (transfer to Bydgoszcz on remand until 31 December 2007), and because that prevented him from opening a kind of bank account in the jail, it was not possible for him to purchase drinking water, and that he had the impression that he was being treated worse than other, Polish-speaking prisoners?
Er Kommissionen desuden bekendt med, at Hörchners familie efter overførslen til Bydgoszcz den 11.10.2007 ikke har modtaget oplysninger om hverken cellenummer eller registreringsnummer med henblik på besøg eller fremsendelse af post og bøger, at der siden hans udlevering ikke har været mulighed for telefonisk kontakt, at der til trods for hans forsæt om pr. post at berette om sit befindende ikke er modtaget post fra ham, at der indtil udgangen af november 2007 ikke vil blive givet oplysninger om anklagen og om, hvorvidt han betragtes som anklaget eller som vidne, hvilket i Nederlandene vækker det indtryk, at han uden forudgående meddelelse og motivering holdes fuldstændig isoleret?
Is the Commission also aware that, after the prisoner was transferred to Bydgoszcz on 11 October 2007, his family was given no cell number of registration number for the purpose of making visits or sending letters and books, that no contact by telephone has been possible since he was extradited, that, contrary to his firm intention to report on his experiences by post, no letters from him have been received at home, and that until the end of November 2007 nothing is expected to be known about charges and whether he is to be regarded as a suspect or a witness, which, in the Netherlands, is creating the impression that, without prior notice and without giving reasons, he is being held in solitary confinement?
Er Kommissionen rede til at opfordre den polske regering til at sikre, at denne indsatte i det mindste får en behandling, som er normal i Polen, og at der stræbes efter en rettergang, der svarer til en nederlandsk rettergang, idet der tages hensyn til hans sårbare position som følge af manglende personlig kontakt og sprogkundskaber, at der sørges for, at hans helbred ikke tager skade og for, at hans familie og bekendte sættes i stand til at opretholde kontakt med ham — med de sædvanlige begrænsninger for indsatte — gennem post, telefon og besøg?
Is the Commission prepared to press the Polish Government to have this prisoner at least treated in a manner which is normal for Poland and to seek to ensure that the judicial process is ‘equivalent’ to what it would be in the Netherlands, taking account of his vulnerability because of the lack of personal contact and language knowledge and ensuring that his health does not suffer and also that his family and friends can keep in touch with him, within the customary constraints applying to prisoners, by post, by telephone and through visits?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5477/07
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5477/07
Om: Rumænske politikere bringer målsætningerne om korruptionsbekæmpelse i fare
Subject: Anti-corruption benchmarks under threat from Romanian politicians
Den seneste udvikling i Rumænien giver anledning til stigende bekymring, for så vidt angår den rumænske regerings vilje til at opfylde målsætningerne i samarbejds‑ og kontrolmekanismen vedrørende reform af retssystemet og bekæmpelse af korruption.
Recent developments in Romania give grounds for increased concern over the Romanian Government's will to fulfil the benchmarks of the cooperation and verification mechanism on judicial reform and the fight against corruption.
Det nationale korruptionsbekæmpelsesdirektorat, en gren inden for den dømmende magt, der var og er af stor betydning for en begrænsning af korruption på topplan, har indgivet klager mod en række toppolitikere, herunder regeringsmedlemmer.
The National Anti-Corruption Directorate (NAD), a judiciary branch that was and is essential to reducing top-level corruption, has filed complaints against several top-level politicians, including members of the government.
Det er udsat for alvorlig intimidering og endog trusler om at blive opløst.
It faces serious intimidation and even the threat of being dismantled.
Den 4. oktober vedtog den rumænske regering uden nogen forudgående debat hastebekendtgørelse 95/­2007 om ændring af loven om ministerielt ansvar, som sikrede øget beskyttelse mod tiltale for medlemmer af regeringen.
On 4 October, the Romanian Government adopted, without any previous public debate, Emergency Ordinance 95/2007 modifying the law regarding ministerial responsibility, ensuring increased protection against indictment for members of the government.
Denne bekendtgørelse fratager bl.a. korruptionsbekæmpelsesdirektoratet retten til at indlede undersøgelser mod ministre.
This ordinance inter alia withdraws the right of the NAD to start investigations against ministers.
Regeringen gav ingen begrundelse for denne afgørelse, og den gav heller ingen forklaring på, hvorfor den anvendte en hasteprocedure.
The government did not state the reasons for this decision, nor did it explain why it used an emergency procedure.
Er Kommissionen enig i, at denne afgørelse fra den rumænske regerings side er i modstrid med målsætning 3 i samarbejds‑ og kontrolmekanismen?
Does the Commission agree that this decision of the Romanian Government counteracts benchmark 3 of the cooperation and verification mechanism?
Hvad vil Kommissionen gøre for at sikre retsgrundlaget for korruptionsbekæmpelsesdirektoratets uafhængighed?
What will the Commission do to ensure the legal basis of independence of the NAD?
Politikere fra flere partier, hvoraf mange selv er under undersøgelse, har angrebet korruptionsbekæmpelsesdirektoratet offentligt.
Politicians of several parties, many of which are under investigation themselves, have attacked the NAD publicly.
Foreløbige konklusioner af en hemmelig undersøgelse af korruptionsbekæmpelsesdirektoratet blev lækket til pressen, formentlig af justitsministeriet.
Draft conclusions on a secret evaluation of the NAD were leaked to the press, presumably by the Ministry of Justice.
Medier med tilknytning til politikere eller politiske partier har offentliggjort artikler, der diskrediterer korruptionsbekæmpelsesdirektoratet.
Media linked to politicians or political parties have issued articles discrediting the NAD.
Er Kommissionen enig i, at denne strategi fra ledende politikeres side, undergraver den offentlige støtte til bekæmpelse af korruption?
Does the Commission agree that this strategy by leading politicians endangers public support for the fight against corruption?
Hvad vil Kommissionen gøre for at forhindre, at dette sker?
What will the Commission do to prevent this from happening?
Målsætning 2 i samarbejds‑ og kontrolmekanismen siger, at den rumænske regering skal oprette et integritetsagentur.
Benchmark 2 of the cooperation and verification mechanism requires the Romanian Government to establish an integrity agency.
Dette nationale integritetsagentur er for øjeblikket ved at blive oprettet.
This National Integrity Agency (INA) is currently being set up.
Hvordan vurderer Kommissionen bestemmelserne vedrørende integritetsagenturet i den rumænske regerings handlingsplan?
How does the Commission assess the provisions on the INA in the action plan of the Romanian Government?
Deler Kommissionen vores bekymring for, at planen ikke sikrer integritetsagenturets effektivitet og uafhængighed og ikke giver mulighed for afskrækkende sanktioner?
Does the Commission share concerns that the plan does not ensure the effectiveness and independence of the ANI, and does not provide for dissuasive sanctions?
Deler Kommissionen vores bekymring for, at den rumænske regering efter Kommissionens seneste fremskridtsrapport (27.6.2007) tilsyneladende ikke sigter mod at opfylde målsætningerne i samarbejds- og kontrolmekanismen vedrørende korruption på højt plan?
Does the Commission share our concerns that, after the Commission's last progress report (27 June 2007), the Romanian Government seems not to be aiming to fulfil the benchmarks of the cooperation and verification mechanism concerning high-level corruption?
Hvordan agter Kommissionen at modvirke denne udvikling?
How does the Commission plan to counteract this development?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5484/07
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5484/07
Om: Europæisk forskning i fibromyalgi (kronisk træthedssyndrom)
Subject: European research on chronic fatigue syndrome
I Det Forenede Kongerige lider en kvart million mennesker og i Den Europæiske Union mange flere endnu af det såkaldte kroniske træthedssyndrom (fibromyalgi).
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) affects a quarter of a million people in the United Kingdom and many more in the European Union.
I øjeblikket ved man meget lidt om årsagerne til denne stærkt belastende sygdom, og forskning er derfor meget nødvendig for bedre at kunne forstå og behandle det kroniske træthedssyndrom.
Currently very little is known about the causes of the debilitating disease, which is why research is crucial in understanding and treating CFS.
På både internationalt og europæisk plan foregår den nuværende forskning i sygdommen imidlertid meget spredt.
Current research into the disease is fragmented both at an international and European level.
Påtænker Kommissionen at øge midlerne og styrke forskningen i denne invaliderende sygdom?
Does the Commission have any plans to strengthen funding and research into this incapacitating disease?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5507/07
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5507/07
Om: Den internationale aids‑dag, den 1. december 2007, og moms på kondomer
Subject: World AIDS Day, 1 December 2007 and VAT on condoms
Den 1. december er international aids‑dag.
World AIDS Day is on 1 December.
WHO's tal fra Europa tyder på, at antallet af nydiagnosticerede HIV‑infektioner er stigende.
Figures from the WHO European Region suggest that the level of newly diagnosed cases of HIV infection in Europe is rising.
Tal fra UN AIDS bekræfter, at antallet af nye infektioner stiger i EU-medlemsstaterne, navnlig i aldersgruppen 15‑25 år.
Figures from UN AIDS confirm that new infections are increasing throughout EU Member States, particularly in the 15-25 age group.
Sikker sex og anvendelse af kondomer er grundlæggende elementer for hindring af overførsel af HIV.
Safe sex and the use of condoms are basic elements in preventing HIV transmission.
Kondomer bør derfor være lette at få fat på og så billige som muligt.
Condoms should therefore be readily accessible and as cheap as possible.
Medlemsstaternes moms på kondomer varierer imidlertid mellem 5 og 25 %.
Levels of VAT levied by Member States on condoms vary, however, from 25 % to 5.5 %.
Momsen er på mange måder en europæisk skat, og der er allerede mulighed for at nedsætte momsen på produkter, der forebygger sygdom.
VAT is in many ways a European tax and the provision exists to reduce rates on products which prevent disease.
Vil Kommissionen overveje at foreslå en reduceret momssats på kondomer i hele Europa for at tilskynde til sikker sex og begrænse overførslen af HIV?
Would the Commission consider proposing a Europe-wide reduced rate of VAT on condoms in order to encourage safer sex and reduce HIV transmission?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5513/07
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5513/07