natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
at artikel 20 (bestemmelser vedrørende social sikring), stk. 10, kun giver personer, der i mindst 10 år uden afbrydelser har haft lovligt ophold på den italienske stats territorium, ret til at modtage social bistand, —
under Article 20 (relating to contribution arrangements), entitlement to the social pension is, by virtue of paragraph 10, restricted to persons who have been legally resident on Italian territory, on a permanent basis, for at least 10 years; —
at artikel 37 (sundhedsattester og sundhedsydelser), stk. 2, ændrer den fælles lov for indvandrere, således at den ikke længere, i tilfælde hvor den ville være gunstigere, finder anvendelse på statsborgere fra EU-lande med det formål at sænke niveauet for sundhedsydelser til EU-borgere, der ikke kan benytte sig af fællesskabsrettens bestemmelser vedrørende fri bevægelighed og fri opholdsret, —
in Article 37 (relating to health certificates and benefits), paragraph 2 makes an amendment whereby the amalgamated immigration law has ceased to apply, in cases where it is more favourable, to citizens of EU Member States; the aim is to lower the level of health benefits for those Community citizens who cannot invoke the rules on free movement and residence laid down by Community law; —
at artikel 81 (olie og gas), stk. 32, indfører et købekort, som udelukkende gælder for borgere med italiensk statsborgerskab, —
in Article 81 (on oil and gas), paragraph 32 provides for a special card enabling purchases of those commodities to be charged to the state; this benefit is intended solely for residents who are Italian citizens; —
at artikel 83 (effektiviteten af den finansielle administration), indeholder bestemmelser om en kontrolplan, der udelukkende skal finde anvendelse på ikke-bosiddende personer og personer, der har været bosiddende i mindre end fem år, tydeligvis ud fra på den fordom, at personer fra andre lande i forholdsvis højere grad end italienske statsborgere unddrager sig skat.
Article 83 (on the efficiency of the financial administration) provides for a checking schedule aimed expressly at non-residents and persons who have been resident for less than five years; this measure stems plainly from the prejudice which has it that tax evasion offences are, relatively speaking, committed more frequently by non-Italians than by Italian citizens.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4723/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4723/08
Om: Forespørgsel om støtte fra EU's strukturfonde til specialskoler for handicappede elever
Subject: Support from the EU's Structural Funds for special primary schools for children with health problems
Undervisning af handicappede elever i Den Tjekkiske Republik foregår under to grundlæggende former: undervisning af svært handicappede elever i specialskoler og integrering af elever med handicap i almindelige grundskoler.
In the Czech Republic the education of children with health problems takes two basic forms: the teaching of the very ill in special primary schools and the integration of children with less serious health problems into normal primary schools.
En tredje mulighed består af en kombination af de to ovennævnte former.
The third option is a combination of those two forms.
For øjeblikket fremstilles integrering af handicappede elever i almindelige grundskoler som den eneste korrekte måde at give dem en uddannelse på.
In the Czech Republic the integration of pupils with health problems into ordinary primary schools is currently being promoted as the only proper way of educating them.
Enhver anden løsning betegnes som segregerende og diskriminerende, og man kan derfor ikke få støtte fra EU's midler til udviklingen af specialskoler for børn med de sværeste handicap.
All other arrangements are seen as segregationist and discriminatory and it is said that no money is available from EU funds for developing special primary schools for children with the most serious health problems.
Hvilke direktiver, forordninger og henstillinger om uddannelse af svært handicappede elever har Kommissionen udarbejdet? 2.
What directives, regulations and recommendations concerning the education of children who are seriously ill has the Commission issued?
Er Kommissionen i besiddelse af en kvantitativ undersøgelse, der viser, at en integreret uddannelse er mere egnet for elever med svære handicap end undervisning i specialskoler?
Has the Commission any kind of quantitative analysis which would demonstrate that integrated education is more suitable for children with serious health problems than is education in a special school?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4724/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4724/08
Om: Nederlandsk skib beslaglagt i Danmark
Subject: Dutch ship detained in Denmark
Den 14. august 2008 beslaglagde de danske myndigheder det mere end firs år gamle nederlanske sejlskib Catherina.
On 14 August the Danish authorities detained the Dutch sailing ship Catherina , which is more than 80 years old.
Det hed sig, at skibet ikke opfyldte de danske sikkerhedskrav.
The vessel allegedly fails to comply with Danish safety standards.
Efter fire dage kunne skibet endelig vende tilbage til Nederlandene på den betingelse, at det ikke igen sejlede ind i danske farvande.
After four days, the vessel was finally allowed to return to the Netherlands on condition that it did not enter Danish waters again.
Catherina er i besiddelse af det nederlandske SPS-certifikat, som den nederlandske søfartsstyrelse (Inpectie Verkeer & Waterstaat) havde udstedt.
The Catherina has the Dutch SPS certificate, received by the Transport and Public Works Inspectorate.
Danmark og Tyskland har meddelt, at de ikke længere kan acceptere SPS-koden for skibe som Catherina og kræver SOLAS’ sikkerhedscertifikat for passagerskibe.
Denmark and Germany have indicated that they will no longer accept the SPS Code for ships such as the Catherina , and are demanding a SOLAS Passenger Ship Certificate.
Dette krav synes at være umuligt at opfylde for historiske sejlskibe; de tyske og danske sejlskibe kan for øvrigt heller ikke opfylde SOLAS’ krav.
It does not seem feasible for historic sailing ships to comply with this requirement; indeed, German and Danish sailing ships cannot do so either.
Derfor har ti lande i 2000 vedtaget at anerkende nationale sikkerhedscertifikater for historiske skibe.
In 2000, therefore, 10 countries decided to allow national safety certificates for historic ships.
I juni 2007 gjorde jeg Kommissionen opmærksom på dette problem mellem de tre medlemsstater.
In June 2007 I drew the Commission's attention to the fact that the problem had arisen among the three Member States.
Kommissionen oplyste i denne forbindelse, at medlemsstaterne først selv ville drøfte dette med hinanden.
The Commission said that the Member States would first discuss the matter among themselves.
I efteråret 2007 førte drøftelserne herom imidlertid ikke til noget resultat.
However, in the autumn of 2007 the talks failed to resolve it.
Nederlandene valgte en mellemløsning (SPS-koden), som blev forkastet af de tyske og danske myndigheder.
An interim solution (the SPS Code) adopted by the Netherlands was rejected by the German and Danish authorities.
I mellemtiden har de danske myndigheder beslaglagt et skib.
Since then, as described above, the Danish authorities have detained a ship.
Har Kommissionen kendskab til de danske myndigheders aktion med beslaglæggelse af et historisk skib fra Nederlandene?
Is the Commission aware of the action taken by the Danish authorities in detaining a historic Dutch sailing ship?
Har Kommissionen kendskab til, at de nederlandske myndigheders forsøg på at føre drøftelser med Tyskland og Danmark for at nå frem til en løsning er mislykkedes, hvorved den grænseoverskridende skibstrafik mellem disse medlemsstater rent faktisk bliver umulig?
Is the Commission aware that efforts by the Dutch authorities to find a solution in consultation with Germany and Denmark have failed, thus de facto making it impossible to sail between these Member States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4725/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4725/08
Om: Problemer med anvendelsen af forordning (EF) nr. 561/2006 på markedshandlende
Subject: Problems with the application of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 to market traders
Der er egentligt tale om de former for transport, der som følge af deres art ikke kan omfattes af forordningens bestemmelser.
These are types of transport which, by their very nature, are unable to be subjected to the provisions of the regulation.
Alligevel er der i forordningen ikke fastsat undtagelser for markedshandlende.
However, the regulation provides no exemption for market traders.
Som følge heraf falder markedshandlende med en lastbil med en vægt på over 7,5 ton ind under forordningens bestemmelser og bliver herigennem begrænset i udøvelsen af deres virksomhed.
As a result, market traders with a lorry weighing more than 7.5 tonnes are covered by the provisions of the regulation and are thus restricted in the exercise of their occupation.
Ville det ikke være ønskeligt, at artikel 13 i forordning (EF) nr. 561/2006 blev tilpasset i den henseende, eller giver den nuværende forordning en anden mulighed for at undtage markedshandlende?
Would it not be desirable to amend Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 to that effect, or does the regulation as it stands offer some other way of exempting market traders?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4749/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4749/08
Om: Frugt-ordning i skolerne i EU
Subject: EU School Fruit Scheme
I begyndelsen af juli bebudede Kommissionen, at den havde til hensigt at indføre en ny EU-ordning med gratis uddeling af frugt og grøntsager i skoler.
At the beginning of July the Commission announced its intention of creating a new EU scheme whereby fruit and vegetables would be distributed free of charge in schools.
Hvornår forventes det, at denne ordning vil blive indført, og hvilken form vil den antage?
When can we expect to see this scheme launched, and what features will it comprise?
Hvordan vil de nationale myndigheder, skoler og lokale myndigheder kunne inddrages i gennemførelsen af dette program?
How can the national authorities, schools and local authorities become involved in the implementation of the programme?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4750/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4750/08
Om: EU-støtte til israelske og palæstinensiske ngo'er
Subject: EU subsidies to Israeli and Palestinian NGOs
Gerald M. Steinberg offentliggjorde i april 2008 »Europe's hidden hand.
In April 2008 Gerald M. Steinberg brought out a study entitled ‘Europe’s hidden hand.
EU Funding for political NGOs in the Arab-Israeli Conflict: Analyzing Processes and Impact«, udgivet af NGO Monitor (websted: monitor.org/data/images/file/NGO_Monitor_EU_Funding_Europes_Hidden_Hand.pdf).
EU Funding for political NGOs in the Arab-Israeli Conflict: Analyzing Processes and Impact’, published by NGO Monitor (http://www.ngo-monitor.org/data/images/File/NGO_Monitor_EU_Funding_Europes_Hidden_Hand.pdf ).
Undersøgelsen omhandler, hvordan israelske og palæstinensiske ngo'er anvender den EU-støtte, de modtager.
This study looks at what Israeli and Palestinian NGOs do with the EU subsidies they receive.
Dette palæstinensiske center rapporterer ganske vist om krænkelser af menneskerettighederne i Palæstina, med det støtter også politisk, økonomisk og akademisk boykot af Israel.
While PCHR reports on intra-Palestinian human rights abuses, it also supports political, economic, and academic boycotts against Israel.
I sin pr-virksomhed har centret beskyldt Israel for etnisk udrensning i sin dækning af den israelske politik i Gaza-striben og omtalt bortførelsen af Gilad Shalit og angrebet på en af de israelske væbnede styrkers forposter i Kerem Shalom som »modstand«.
In its public relations activities, PCHR has accused Israel of ethnic cleansing in its coverage of Israeli policy in Gaza and referred to the abduction of Gilad Shalit and attack against an IDF outpost at Kerem Shalom as “resistance” . ’
Har Kommissionen kendskab hertil, og erkender den, at en sådan udvikling er til skade for en afbalanceret tilgang til såvel israelske som palæstinensiske og arabiske ngo'er i den komplicerede situation, der hersker i Israel og de palæstinensiske områder? 4.
Is the Commission aware of these facts, and does it recognise that such developments are damaging to a balanced approach to Israeli NGOs on the one hand and Palestinian/Arab NGOs on the other within the complex situation in Israel and the Palestinian territories?
Er Kommissionen villig til på Durban-opfølgningskonferencen i 2009 med de berørte parter at drøfte spørgsmålet om grænser, som ngo'er skal holde sig inden for, således som det anbefales i undersøgelsen (s. 30-31), hvor det hedder, at EU bør agere på en lignende måde for at hindre, at ngo'er anvender midler, der er bestemt til støtte for fred, demokrati, udvikling og menneskerettigheder, til kontraproduktive og skadelige aktiviteter?
Is the Commission prepared, at the 2009 Durban Review Conference, to discuss with the parties concerned the options as regards ‘red lines’ to which NGOs should adhere, as the study advises (pp. 30-31): ‘The EU should act in a similar manner to prevent NGOs from exploiting funds designated for peace, democracy, development and human rights for use in counterproductive and damaging activities.’?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4751/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4751/08
Om: Tvangspolitik for begrænsning af fødsler i Kina
Subject: China's forced birth control policy
Ifølge oplysninger i medier og fra menneskerettighedsorganisationer fører Kina fortsat en tvangspolitik for begrænsning af fødsler (»one child policy«).
According to reports in the media and from human rights organisations, China is continuing to implement a forced birth control policy (known as the ‘one‑child’ policy).
Gennemførelsen af den indebærer i praksis en tvangsabort, når en familie skal have et andet eller et tredje barn.
This policy results in the forced abortion of all children conceived after the first-born.
I 2006-2010 vil FN's Befolkningsfond (UNFPA) bruge 27 mio. dollar i Kina, hvoraf helt op til 21 mio. (77 %!) er afsat til programmer inden for reproduktiv sundhed, navnlig abort.
Over the period 2006‑10, the UNPFA will spend USD 27 million in China, with fully 77 % of that amount (USD 21 million) going to ‘reproductive health’ programmes involving activities that include abortion.
Kontrollerer Kommissionen de udbetalinger, som foretages med europæiske skatteyders penge, i lyset af, at de anvendes til at finansiere aktiviteter, som ikke er i overensstemmelse med respekten for menneskerettigheder og menneskelig værdighed?
Is the Commission monitoring the way in which European taxpayers' money is being spent, with a view to preventing the funding of activities that violate human rights and human dignity?
Har Kommissionen sikkerhed for, at europæiske skatteyderes penge via UNFPA ikke finansierer programmer for tvangsaborter, sterilisationer eller såkaldte »tidlige aborter«, som også kan foretages i niende måned?
Is it sure that European taxpayers' money is not, through the activities of the UNPFA, being used to fund programmes involving forced abortion, sterilisation and ‘late abortion’ (in some cases practised on children in the ninth month of life)?
Hvad gør Kommissionen for at sikre, at dette ikke sker?
What is the Commission doing to obtain the necessary guarantees in this respect?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4756/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4756/08
Om: Kollektiv rensning af spildevand
Subject: Waste water treatment systems other than collective systems
Forvaltningen af de tjenester, der står for rensning af spildevand, varetages direkte af de lokale myndigheder eller uddelegeres til private virksomheder.
Waste treatment services are managed directly by the local authority or delegated to a private company.
Hvad angår ikkekollektiv rensning af spildevand, findes der forskellige rensningsanlæg, som kan anvendes i de tilfælde, hvor det ikke er muligt at benytte det gængse system.
In the case of waste treatment systems other than communal systems, a number of different treatment options are available in cases where no connection with the mains drainage system is possible.
Disse anlæg betragtes som undtagelser og skal godkendes af den relevante administrative myndighed (den offentlige tjeneste for ikkekollektiv rensning (SPANC)) i overensstemmelse med de generelle bestemmelser for lokale myndigheder (artikel L2224-8 og L2224-9).
Such arrangements are regarded as exceptional and require the agreement of the relevant administrative authority, namely the public service for waste water treatment systems other than collective systems (SPANC) pursuant to the ‘Code Général des Collectivités Territoriales (local authorities’ General Code), Articles L 224-8 and 9.
Den nugældende franske lovgivning for individuel rensning af spildevand findes i DTU 64-1.
The current French legislation governing individual waste water treatment systems is DTU 64-1.
I henhold til de franske bestemmelser i DTU 64-1 er spredning af slam obligatorisk for mikrorensningsanlæg baseret på aktiveret slam, hvorimod EU-bestemmelserne som omsat i fransk lovgivning i NF EN 12566-3 tillader direkte udledning i nettet for overfladevand, afledningsgrøfter osv.
Under the French legislation DTU 64-1, in the case of small activated sludge treatment plants, sludge spreading is mandatory, but the French Standard NF CE 12566-3 incorporating the European rules authorises direct discharges into the surface water systems, ditches etc.
Hvilke af disse tekster har retskraft?
Which of these texts has legal force?
Er de ikkekollektive rensningsanlæg fremover forpligtet til at efterleve den EU-lovgivning, der har været gældende siden juli 2008?
Is it now mandatory for public services for waste treatment systems other than collective systems (SPANC) to comply with the European legislation which has applied since July 2008?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4757/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4757/08
Om: MS Coronia
Subject: The MV Coronia
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4780/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4780/08
Om: Studerendes sultestrejke i marokkanske fængsler
Subject: Students on hunger strike in Moroccan jails
Den 14. maj 2008 fandt der i Marrakesh en demonstration sted med over 1 000 studerende, der krævede bedre forhold (højere stipendier eller gratis transport).
On 14 May 2008 over 1 000 students demonstrated in Marrakesh demanding better conditions (higher grants and free transport).
Reaktionen på denne demonstration var indgriben fra de marokkanske sikkerhedsstyrkers side, der resulterede i, at 300 studerende blev såret, mens et tilsvarende antal blev fængslet, bl.a. Zahra Boudkour.
The reaction of the Moroccan security forces left 300 students wounded, and another 300 were arrested, among them Zahra Boudkour.
Den tortur og de trusler, som Zahra og hendes kammerater har været udsat for, siden de blev indsat i fængslet, har foranlediget dem til at indlede en sultestrejke, hvormed de håber på at opnå bedre forhold i fængslet.
Following the torture and threats to which they have been subjected since the moment they were imprisoned, Zahra and her companions have begun a hunger strike aimed at winning them better prison conditions.
Undertegnede har ved mange lejligheder henvendt sig til Kommissionen for at gøre opmærksom på de konstante overtrædelser af menneskerettighederne i Marokko.
The author of this question has on numerous occasions raised with the Commission the issue of the recurrent human rights abuses in Morocco.
På trods heraf overvejer EU at udbygge sine forbindelser med Kongeriget Marokko og indrømme landet præferencestatus som led i den europæiske naboskabspolitik.
Despite this, the EU is now considering deepening its relations with Morocco and offering it preferential status under the European Neighbourhood Policy.
Finder Kommissionen på denne baggrund ikke, at der bør foretages en undersøgelse af menneskerettighedssituationen i landet, inden det opnår status som privilegeret partner?
Does the Commission not believe that before preferential status is granted to Morocco there should be a prior investigation of the human rights situation in that country?
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen iværksat eller påtænker den at iværksætte for at kræve, at Kongeriget Marokko i første række løslader de fængslede og generelt nøje overholder menneskerettighederne i landet?
What steps have been or will be taken by the Commission with a view to calling on Morocco to free these prisoners and ensuring there is global respect for human rights in that country?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4781/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4781/08
Om: PMOI's placering på EU's terrorliste
Subject: Inclusion of the PMOI in the EU's list of terrorist organisations
Kan Rådet oplyse, hvor mange lande der undlod at stemme, da Clearing House i sommer traf beslutning om PMOI's placering på EU's terrorliste?
Could the Council say how many countries abstained when Clearing House took the decision this summer to place the PMOI on the EU's list of terrorist organisations.
Den 15. juli vedtog Rådet med enstemmighed fælles holdning 2008/586/FUSP om ajourføring af fælles holdning 2001/931/FUSP om anvendelse af specifikke foranstaltninger til bekæmpelse af terrorisme.
On 15 July, the Council unanimously adopted Common Position 2008/586/CFSP updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures with a view to combating terrorism.
Det vedtog også med enstemmighed Rådets afgørelse 2008/583/EF vedrørende de personer og enheder, der er anført i Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 2580/2001 om specifikke restriktive foranstaltninger mod visse personer og enheder med henblik på at bekæmpe terrorisme.
It also unanimously adopted Council Decision 2008/583/EC concerning the persons and entities listed under Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism.
I medfør af artikel 7 og 9 i Rådets forretningsorden besluttede Rådet ikke at offentliggøre resultatet afstemningen om Rådets afgørelse.
Pursuant to Article 7 and Article 9 of the Council's Rules of Procedure, the Council has decided not to make the result of the vote on the Council decision public.
Ifølge disse artikler er Rådet heller ikke forpligtet til at offentliggøre resultatet af afstemningen om den fælles holdning.
Pursuant to these articles the Council is not obliged either to make the result of the vote on the common position public.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-4782/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4782/08
Om: Såkaldte estiske frivilliges handlinger under krigen i Georgien
Subject: Activities of Estonian ‘volunteers’ during the war in Georgia
Umiddelbart efter udbruddet af den militære konfrontation mellem Georgien og Rusland, som var et resultat af Georgiens angreb på den sydossetiske by Zchinwali, udsendte foreningen af reservister i Estland et opråb om rekruttering af frivillige til en mission til støtte for Georgien i krigen mod Rusland, hvor deltagerne i denne mission også blev opfordret til at medbringe deres uniform.
Soon after the start of the military confrontation between Georgia and Russia, which was caused by the Georgian attack on the town of Zchinwali in South Ossetia, there was a call from the Estonian Reserve Officers’ Association for volunteers to be recruited for a mission to support Georgia in the war against Russia and also for uniforms to be worn on the mission.
Det oplystes, at deltagerne ville blive transporteret i et regeringsfly, som skulle bringe humanitær hjælp til Tiflis samt flyve estiske statsborgere ud af Georgien.
It was announced that the volunteers would be transported in a government plane which was to take humanitarian aid to Tbilisi and fly Estonian citizens out of Georgia.
Blandt initiativtagerne til opråbet var ud over formanden for Estlands forening af reservister, Priit Heinsalu, også den tidligere diplomat og nuværende direktør for Laidoner-museet, Indrek Tarand.
The call came, among others, from Priit Heinsalu, chair of the Estonian Reserve Officers’ Association, and Indrek Tarand, former diplomat and now director of the Laidon Museum.
Omkring 50 mennesker sluttede op om dette opråb og fløj til Tiflis, men ifølge pressemeddelelser fløj de ikke med regeringsflyet.
Some 50 people answered the call and flew to Tbilisi, although media reports stated that they did not fly in a government plane.