natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nærmere bestemt finansieres Enterprisefonden af The European Center of Advanced Technology (EUCAT SA), som medfinansieres af græske og europæiske midler (Den Europæiske Fond for Regionaludvikling).
The necessary funding for this undertaking is provided by the National Fund for Entrepreneurship and Development (ETEAN A.E.), which in turn receives assistance from Greece and Europe (European Regional Development Fund).
Hvad er formålet med Enterprisefonden?
What are the objectives of the Entrepreneurship Fund?
Hvad er årsagerne til den mislykkede indkaldelse af investorer med interesse for fonden?
What are the reasons for the lack of response to calls for manifestations of interest therein?
Hvorfor har de græske banker udvist modvilje mod fonden? 2.
Why was no interest shown by Greek banks? 2.
Hvilke foranstaltninger påtænker Kommissionen at træffe, for at der vil ske en effektiv absorption af midlerne, således at disse bidrager til en genoplivning af den græske økonomi?
What measures will it take to ensure that the funds are effectively utilised in order to contribute to economic recovery in Greece?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008428/2011
Question for written answer E-008428/2011
Om: Forsinkelser med hensyn til gennemførelsen af digi-lodge
Subject: Delays in implementing the digi-lodge online booking system
Det operationelle projekt »Digital konvergens« i den græske nationale strategiske referenceramme 2007‑2013 omfatter tjenesten »Støtte til hotel- og turistenheder til at oprette websteder og edb-reservationssystemer (digi-lodge)«, budgetteret til 45 mio. EUR.
The ‘digital convergence’ operational programme forming part of the 2007‑13 NSRF for Greece contains a EUR 45 million package for the creation of websites promoting hotels and establishments providing tourist accommodation and the introduction of digi-lodge online booking systems.
Vil Kommissionen venligst udspecificere denne tjeneste?
Can the Commission provide further details?
Hvorfor er processen med at bedømme ansøgningerne forsinket?
What is the reason for delays in processing applications?
Hvilke hindringer er der tale om?
What obstacles are being encountered?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008429/2011
Question for written answer E-008429/2011
Om: Særlige økonomiske zoner
Subject: Special Economic Zones
I den forbindelse undersøger vi forskellige scenarier.
Various different scenarios are being examined.
Enten skal beslutningerne træffes af den græske regering eller af Kommissionen« … »Et andet interessant forslag ville være at drøfte anden potentiel støtte til virksomheder med Kommissionen, fastsættelse af særlige regler som incitamenter for visse områder i Grækenland og generelt for områder, der i dag er ramt af krisen.
Either decision-taking should lie with the Greek Government, or else decisions should also be taken by the Commission… Another interesting proposal is that discussions should also be held with the Commission about other ways of supporting undertakings and about whether specific rules might be laid down as incentives for certain regions in Greece and generally areas that are currently affected by the crisis.
Dette forslag bør naturligvis diskuteres med den græske regering her i Athen og med Kommissionen i Bruxelles, men vi er af den overbevisning, at erfaringen viser, at denne form for incitamenter kan føre til yderligere investeringer fra virksomhederne«.
This proposal should of course be discussed jointly with the Greek Government here in Athens and the Commission in Brussels, but we believe that experience shows that such incentives can lead to additional investment by businesses.’
Drøfter man i Kommissionen forslaget om at etablere særlige økonomiske zoner eller en ændring af investeringsloven i Grækenland, samt overvejer man at vedtage specifikke regler som incitamenter for visse områder? —
Is a proposal to create Special Economic Zones or change the law on investment in Greece and adopt specific rules as incentives for certain areas being discussed in the Commission? —
Hvilke særlige incitamenter er der tale om?
What are the specific incentives in question?
Er der tale om skattemæssige, beskæftigelsesmæssige eller helt andre incitamenter?
Are they fiscal or labour or other incentives?
Kræver de en undtagelse fra EU‑reglerne?
Do they require a derogation from EU rules?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008430/2011
Question for written answer E-008430/2011
Om: Øvre aldersgrænse for rekruttering af stævningsmænd
Subject: Upper age limit for recruitment of court bailiffs
Er ovennævnte bestemmelse i overensstemmelse med fællesskabslovgivningen?
Is this provision in accordance with Community law?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008431/2011
Question for written answer E-008431/2011
Om: Udsættelse af låneudbetaling fra Den Europæiske Investeringsbank
Subject: Suspension of disbursement of loan by the European Investment Bank
Ifølge oplysninger har Den Europæiske Investeringsbank (EIB) udsat udbetalingen af bevilligede lån til de græske banker, private virksomheder og den græske stat som følge af Grækenlands lave kreditværdighed.
The European Investment Bank (EIB) has reportedly suspended the disbursement of loans contracted with Greek banks, private companies and the Greek State because of Greece's low credit rating.
I betragtning af at EIB medfinansierer mange og store projekter i Grækenland gennem den nationale strategiske referenceramme, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende spørgsmål: —
Given that very many major projects are being co-financed by the EIB in Greece through the NSRF and other programmes, will the Commission say: —
Er ovennævnte oplysninger om indefrysning af EIB's låneudbetalinger til Grækenland korrekte?
Is there any truth in the above reports that the disbursement of EIB loans to Greece has been frozen?
På baggrund af hvilken ordning har EIB i bekræftende fald truffet denne beslutning?
If so, on the basis of which regulation was this decision taken by the EIB?
Vil Kommissionen venligst fremsende os den pågældende erklæring fra EIB? —
Will the Commission provide the relevant announcement by the EIB? —
Hvad er størrelsen af de indefrosne udbetalinger?
What is the amount of the suspended payments?
Vil Kommissionen venligst sende listen med projekter, der bliver berørt af udbetalingerne?
Will it provide the list of the projects concerned by these payments?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008432/2011
Question for written answer E-008432/2011
Om: VP/HR — aktion vedrørende forfølgelse af ahmadiyyamuslimer i Indonesien
Subject: VP/HR — EU action on Ahmadiyya Muslim persecution in Indonesia
Ahmadiyyamuslimer har været etableret i EU i årtier, herunder i min egen valgkreds i det nordøstlige England.
Ahmadiyya Muslim communities have been established across the European Union for decades, including in my own constituency of the North East of England.
I lyset af angrebene på ahmadiyyamuslimer i Indonesien i februar og på baggrund af de hidtidige bestræbelser fra EU's delegation i Jakarta som beskrevet i besvarelsen af 30. august 2011 på den skriftlige forespørgsel E‑007616/2011:
In light of the attacks on Ahmadiyya Muslims in Indonesia in February, and building on the efforts to date of the Delegation of the European Union in Jakarta as referred to in the answer of 30 August 2011 to Written Question E‑007616/2011:
Hvad gør Kommissionen for at overtale den indonesiske regering til at ophæve sit tværministerielle dekret fra 2008, som forfølger den ahmadiyyamuslimske befolkning?
What is the Commission doing to persuade the Indonesian government to repeal its 2008 joint ministerial decree, which persecutes the Ahmadiyya Muslim population?
Hvad gør Kommissionen for at sikre, at den indonesiske regering overholder sine forpligtelser over for sin egen forfatning og den internationale konvention om borgerlige og politiske rettigheder, som den har underskrevet?
What is the Commission doing to ensure the Indonesian government honours its commitments to its own constitution and to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which it is a signatory?
Kan Kommissionen med henvisning til besvarelsen af 7. april 2011 på skriftlig forespørgsel E‑001836/2011 kommentere, hvilke fremskridt den indonesiske regering har gjort siden da med forslaget til lov om religiøs harmoni, og hvorvidt dette vil sikre religionsfrihed i praksis?
With reference to the answer of 7 April 2011 to Written Question E‑001836/2011, can the Commission comment on what progress the Indonesian government has made since that date with the proposed bill for religious harmony and on whether this will guarantee religious freedom in practice?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008433/2011
Question for written answer E-008433/2011
Om: Shariaretspraksis i Europa
Subject: Sharia law in Europe
Ud over England, hvor en gruppe islamiske fundamentalister har udråbt Londonforstaden Waltham Forest til et islamisk emirat og indført den strenge sharialov i bydelen http://www.telegraaf.nl/buitenland/10269486/__Fundamenta_listen_nemen_Londense_wijk_over-html?sn=binnenland,buitenland. , er der nu i Antwerpen etableret en domstol, der behandler ægteskabsstridigheder og arvespørgsmål i overensstemmelse med islamisk retspraksis.
In addition to the United Kingdom, where a group of Islamic fundamentalists has declared the London borough of Waltham Forest an Islamic Emirate and has declared the strict sharia law applicable to the area http://www.telegraaf.nl/buitenland/10269486/__Fundamenta_listen_nemen_Londense_wijk_over-html?sn=binnenland,buitenland , a court has now been opened in Antwerp which handles marriage disputes and inheritance issues according to Islamic law.
Det drejer sig om et initiativ iværksat af den radikale muslimske gruppe Shariah4Belgium.
It is an initiative of the radical Muslim group Shariah4Belgium.
Dette oplyser avisen Het Laatste Nieuws http://www.hln.be/hln/nl/1275/Islam/article/detail/1317026/2011/09/10/Shariah4Belgium-opent-islamitische-rechtbank-voor-huwelijks--en-erfeniskwesties.dhtml. .
This is reported in the newspaper Het Laatste Nieuws http://www.hln.be/hln/nl/1275/Islam/article/detail/1317026/2011/09/10/Shariah4Belgium-opent-islamitische-rechtbank-voor-huwelijks--en-erfeniskwesties.dhtml .
Er Kommissionen af samme opfattelse som PVV, nemlig at sharia aldrig må anvendes i Europa?
Does the Commission agree with the PVV Party that sharia law should never be adopted in Europe?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, i hvilke øvrige EU‑lande sharia bliver anvendt?
Can the Commission state in which other EU Member States sharia law is being applied?
Hvad er Kommissionens vurdering af udtalelserne fra et medlem af gruppen »Muslims against crusades« om, at »kvinder skal bære burka« og »vantro skal stenes«?
How does the Commission view the statements by a supporter of the group Muslims Against Crusades that ‘women must wear burkas’ and ‘adulterers must be stoned’?
Hvad er Kommissionens vurdering af det faktum, at der i en europæisk by, såsom London, er ophængt og distribueret plakater med tekster som »du betræder nu et område, der er underlagt sharia — her gælder islamiske love«?
How does the Commission view the fact that in a European city such as London posters are put up and distributed, saying ‘you are entering a Shariah controlled zone — Islamic rules enforced’?
Er Kommissionen, i lighed med PVV, af den opfattelse, at organisationer, som opfordrer til voldelig kamp mod ikkemuslimer og ønsker at indføre den undertrykkende og voldelige sharialov, udgør en trussel mod den demokratiske retsorden og bør forbydes?
Does the Commission believe, following the example of the PVV, that organisations which call for a violent struggle against non-Muslims and which wish to introduce the oppressive and violent sharia law are a threat to democracy and should be banned?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008435/2011
Question for written answer E-008435/2011
Om: Firedobling af antallet af forsinkede betalinger i forbindelse med den spanske offentlige administration
Subject: Fourfold increase in late payments by public administrations in Spain
I Spanien gennemføres der et uforholdsmæssigt stort antal betalinger til handelstransaktioner mellem virksomheder eller mellem virksomheder og offentlige myndigheder meget senere end aftalt.
In Spain, an excessively high proportion of payments for commercial transactions between companies, or between companies and public authorities, are made much later than the agreed date.
Disse forsinkelser betyder højere omkostninger for virksomhederne, skaber sociale spændinger og har negative indvirkninger på konkurrenceevnen for de private virksomheder i medlemsstaterne.
These delays entail high costs for the businesses involved, create social tensions and are extremely counterproductive in terms of the competitiveness of private companies in the Member States.
Med henblik på at bekæmpe disse forsinkede betalinger blev direktiv 2000/35/EF vedtaget.
Directive 2000/35/EC was approved as a means of tackling this problem.
Direktivet harmoniserer ikke betalingsbetingelserne, men skaber en lovbestemt ret til at opkræve renter 30 dage efter fakturadatoen, som skal overholdes i alle EU‑medlemsstaterne.
The directive does not harmonise payment periods, but creates a legal right to charge interest 30 days after the date of the invoice, applicable in all EU Member States.
I juni 2010 vedtog den spanske kongres en reform af lov 3/2004 om bekæmpelse af forsinkede betalinger, hvori der fastsættes betalingsfrister på 60 dage for virksomheder til deres leverandører, og for offentlige administrationer er denne frist på 30 dage.
In June 2010 the Spanish Parliament approved a reform of Law 3/2004 combating late payments, establishing that firms have a maximum period of 60 days in which to pay their suppliers, with the period being limited to 30 days in the case of public administrations.
Den 14. august bragte avisen El País følgende overskrift: Regeringernes forsinkede betalinger beløber sig nu til 50 mia., hvilket svarer til en firedobling sammenlignet med perioden før krisen.
However, on 14 August 2011, Spanish daily newspaper El País headlined the day's edition saying that ‘Spain's authorities now owe EUR 50 billion in unpaid bills, four times higher than before the crisis’.
Det fremgik af en artikel i avisen http://www.elpais.com/articulo/espana/Gobiernos/suman/50000/millones/impagos/cuadruple/crisis/elpepiesp/20110814elpepinac_1/Tes?print=1. , at de lokale administrationer i gennemsnit er 238 dage om at betale leverandører af offentlige arbejder, mens tallet er på 155 dage for de selvstyrende regioner og 140 dage for centralregeringen.
Further information was given in another article http://www.elpais.com/articulo/espana/Gobiernos/suman/50000/millones/impagos/cuadruple/crisis/elpepiesp/20110814elpepinac_1/Tes?print= in the same edition, including data showing that local authorities, regional authorities and the central government pay their suppliers on average 238, 155 and 140 days respectively after receipt of the invoice.
Set i lyset af at situationen ikke forbedres, og at lovgivningen på EU‑plan og på det statslige plan gentagne gange overtrædes, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
Given that the situation is not improving and that authorities in Spain have repeatedly failed to comply with the relevant EU and Spanish regulations: 1.
Overvejer Kommissionen at indlede en overtrædelsesprocedure mod Spanien i henhold til artikel 258 i TEUF? 2.
Is the Commission planning to open infringement proceedings against the Spanish Government in accordance with Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union? 2.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at den spanske offentlige administrations forsinkede betaling af regninger samt de knappe kreditmuligheder udgør et af de væsentligste problemer for små og mellemstore virksomheder i Spanien og for landets genopretning af økonomien?
Does the Commission agree that these delays in settling accounts by the Spanish public authorities, together with a lack of credit, are among the main problems facing Spain's small and medium-sized enterprises and the country's economic recovery?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008436/2011
Question for written answer E-008436/2011
Om: Oprindelsesbetegnelsen »Queso del Roncal«
Subject: ‘Roncal cheese’ designation of origin
I november 2008 blev der indledt en procedure til ændring af varespecifikationen for oprindelsesbetegnelsen »Queso del Roncal«.
In November 2008, proceedings were launched to amend the specifications of the ‘Roncal cheese’ designation of origin.
Første administrative foranstaltning bestod i, at den spanske regering skulle indføre en midlertidig national beskyttelse, men denne foranstaltning har skadet de osteproducenter, som opfyldte betingelserne for denne oprindelsesbetegnelse.
At administrative level, the first consequence was that the Spanish Government granted ‘temporary national protection’ status, a decision which has had serious repercussions for the cheese producers who were acting in compliance with the conditions of the aforementioned designation.
Den nationale beskyttelsesforanstaltning, der blev vedtaget den 16. februar 2009, gjorde det muligt at producere ost under denne betegnelse med mælk fra racer, som ikke tidligere var omfattet af bestemmelserne.
In practice, this national protection status, passed on 16 February 2009, allows cheese made with milk from other sheep breeds that are not included in the initial regulation to bear the same designation.
Inden for de seneste to år har dette resulteret i en fastfrysning af mælkepriserne for de lokale producenter, aflysning af mælkeindsamlingsruter i vanskeligt tilgængelige områder, for stort udbud samt mætning af markedet for så vidt angår produkter med betegnelsen »Roncal«.
This has led to stagnant milk prices for local producers in the last two years, the abandonment of collection routes for milk produced in areas that are difficult to access and an excessive supply of Roncal-designated cheese, leading to market saturation.
Hvad er status for proceduren til ændring af varespecifikationen for oprindelsesbetegnelsen »Roncal«?
What stage has been reached on the application to amend the Roncal designation of origin specifications?
Er der i lyset af de nævnte konsekvenser fremlagt argumenter, der kan retfærdiggøre ændringen i varespecifikationen?
In light of the problems outlined above, do arguments exist that would justify approving an amendment of the specifications?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008437/2011
Question for written answer E-008437/2011
Om: Projekt til installering af en højspændingsledning mellem Peñalba og Isona
Subject: Peñalba-Isona high voltage power line project
Følgende fremgår af kommissær Potocniks svar på skriftlig forespørgsel P‑002257/2011 af 7. april 2011 afgivet på vegne af Kommissionen:
In his answer to Question P‑002257/2011 of 7 April 2011, Commissioner Potočnik, on behalf of the Commission, said that:
For at få større kendskab til sagen med henblik på efterfølgende undersøgelse vil Kommissionen anmode de kompetente spanske myndigheder om oplysninger for så vidt angår overholdelsen af de gældende bestemmelser i EU's miljølovgivning.
‘In order to know the details of the case and to investigate the issues raised in the Honourable Member’s question, the Commission will request information from the competent Spanish authorities concerning compliance with the relevant requirements under EU environmental law.
Kommissionen vil især bede de spanske myndigheder om at redegøre for overholdelsen af bestemmelserne i VVM‑direktivet.
In particular, the Commission will ask the Spanish authorities how they have applied the provisions of the EIA Directive’.
I lyset af ovenstående og i betragtning af at det er fem måneder siden, at Kommissionen fremsendte sit svar, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende: 1.
In light of this statement and the fact that five months have passed since the Commission’s answer: 1.
Har Kommissionen modtaget svar samt de nødvendige oplysninger fra den spanske regering vedrørende højspændingsledningen mellem Peñalba og Isona?
Can the Commission confirm whether it has received an answer and the necessary and appropriate clarifications from the Spanish Government about ‘the Peñalba-Isona high voltage power line’ project?
Kan Kommissionen i bekræftende fald videregive disse? 2.
If so, what clarifications were made? 2.
Er Kommissionen tilfreds med regeringens svar?
Is the Commission satisfied with the government’s explanations?
Er svarene tilstrækkelige til at fastslå, at der ikke er tale om en overtrædelse af direktiv 85/337/EØF Direktiv 85/337/EØF ( EFT L 175 af 5.7.1985 ), som ændret ved direktiv 97/11/EF ( EFT L 73 af 14.3.1997 ), 2003/35/EF (EUT L 156 af 25.6.2003) og 2009/31/EF (EUT L 140 af 5.6.2009). ? 3.
Are they adequate to ensure compliance with Directive 85/337/EEC Directive 85/337/EEC (OJ L 175, 5.7.1985) as amended by Directive 97/11/EC (OJ L 73, 14.3.1997), Directive 2003/35/EC (OJ L 156, 25.6.2003) and Directive 2009/31/EC (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009). ? 3.
Hvilken svarfrist har Kommissionen fastsat i tilfælde af, at den endnu ikke har modtaget den spanske regerings svar?
If the Spanish Government has not yet responded, when is the deadline set by the Commission?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-008438/2011
Question for written answer E-008438/2011
Om: Momsstigning til 23 % inden for restaurationsbranchen
Subject: Increase in VAT to 23 % in the catering sector
Midt i den økonomiske recession, som Grækenland i øjeblikket gennemlever, med barske stramninger har den græske regering inden for rammerne af det aftalte program med EU og IMF om sanering af den græske økonomi den 1. september vedtaget en ny stigning i de lave momssatser (ændret fra 13 % til 23 %), denne gang inden for restaurationsbranchen (restauranter, cafeer og taverner) og på visse produkter som sodavand, frugt- og grønsagsjuice osv.
On 1 September 2011, within the framework of the financial reform programme agreed with the EU and the IMF and in the midst of the economic recession affecting Greece and stringent austerity measures, the Greek Government imposed a fresh increase in the lowest VAT rates (from 13 % to 23 %), this time in the catering sector (restaurants, cafeterias and bars) and for certain products such as soft drinks, fruit juices, vegetables, etc.
Ifølge nyligt offentliggjorte undersøgelser i Grækenland foretaget af økonomiske institutter og industriråd skønner man, at denne skatteindbringende foranstaltning vil ramme den bredere økonomi, idet man forudser følgende: —
Recently published studies and surveys carried out in Greece by financial institutions and chambers of commerce show that this VAT increase will hit the wider economy, since it will: —
At mange små virksomheder inden for branchen må lukke, hvilket betyder en højere arbejdsløshed —
lead to the closure of a large number of micro-enterprises in the sector, further aggravating the unemployment situation; —
At den vil betyde en reducering af efterspørgslen på 15 % og dermed svække den i forvejen lave købekraft hos forbrugerne —
lead to a 15 % reduction in demand, by adding to the drop in consumer purchasing power: —
At den vil have en negativ virkning på landets turistprodukt og ramme turistindustrien ved at reducere konkurrenceevnen for græsk turisme og gøre landet til den dyreste turistdestination.
have an adverse effect on income from tourism and hit the tourism sector in Greece, since the sector will be less competitive and Greece will become a more expensive tourist destination.
På grundlag af ovennævnte bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
Can the Commission answer the following questions: 1.