natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe, såfremt det som et led i en konkret kontrol konstateres, at delstaten Kärnten har begået ulovlige handlinger?
What measures does the Commission propose to take if, during its investigations, it establishes that the region of Carinthia has acted illegally?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5883/09
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5883/09
Om: Selskabstømning i forbindelse med papirfabrikken i Štúrovo i Slovakiet
Subject: Asset stripping at Štúrovo paper mill in Slovakia
Det irske selskab Smurfit Kappa købte papirfabrikken i Štúrovo i 2005 og ejer 98,5 % af kapitalen.
The Irish company Smurfitt Kappa bought Štúrovo paper mill in 2005 and has a 98.5 % stake in it.
Trods disse vanskeligheder udlåner fabrikken i Štúrovo penge til sit moderselskab til en årlig rente på 0,6 %, men majoritetsselskabet betaler ikke tilbage på disse lån, men øger blot sin gæld.
Despite these difficulties, the Štúrovo company is lending cash to its parent company at an annual interest rate of 0.6 %, yet the majority firm is not paying off this loan but simply increasing its obligation to it.
Der er kun to virksomheder i Europa, som fremstiller fluting (papir til indlæg i bølgepap) – virksomheden i Štúrovo og den finske virksomhed Powerflute (som tilhører majoritetsselskabets familieimperium og er kommet i vanskeligheder og har brug for afsætningsmarkeder).
There are only two companies in Europe that produce fluting — the company in Štúrovo and the Finnish company Powerflute (which belongs to the family empire of the majority owner and has encountered difficulties, and needs a market for sales).
Desuden er fluting billigere i sammenligning med den traditionelle produktion af karton (det såkaldte kraft board) og har bedre miljøegenskaber.
Furthermore, compared with the traditional production of paperboard (known as ‘kraft board’), fluting is less expensive and is more promising from an environmental point of view.
Det slovakiske økonomiministerium har tilbudt virksomheden beskyttelse og økonomisk bistand, men dette tilbud blev afvist af virksomheden, selv om staten har givet den skattelettelser på hen ved 50 millioner slovakiske kroner siden privatiseringen.
The company was offered protection and financial aid by Slovakia’s Economy Ministry, but it rejected this offer despite having received tax relief of approximately SKK 50 million from the state since privatisation.
Selv om investorer har vist interesse for at købe virksomheden som helhed og fortsætte fremstillingen af fluting, har ejerne besluttet at splitte virksomheden op og frasælge dens aktiver enkeltvis.
Despite the interest being shown by investors in purchasing the company as a whole and continuing to manufacture fluting, the owners decided to break up the company and sell off its assets individually.
Den 1. oktober 2009 bekendtgjorde virksomheden, at den ville standse produktionen og afskedige sine ansatte, og at denne proces skulle være afsluttet i marts 2010.
On 1 October 2009, the company announced that it would be ceasing production and laying off its employees, a process that would be complete in March 2010.
Hvad agter Kommissionen at gøre for at undgå, at yderligere hundredvis af personer bliver arbejdsløse i et område, hvor der allerede er en meget høj arbejdsløshed, ikke mindst i lyset af, at dette kan få virkninger for omkring 1.000 familier i området, når underleverandørerne også tages i betragtning?
What does the Commission intend to do to avoid hundreds more people becoming unemployed in an area where there is already a very high level of unemployment, not least as this may affect around 1 000 families in the region when subcontractors are taken into account?
Agter Kommissionens at undersøge virksomhedens ledelse og mistanken om, at der ulovligt overføres aktiver til det udenlandske moderselskab, samt ejerens hensigt om at »skaffe sig af med« en konkurrerende virksomhed og dermed få adgang til dens marked?
Does the Commission intend to investigate the company’s management and the suspicion that assets are being illegally transferred to the foreign parent company, as well as the owner’s intention to ‘remove’ a competing company and thereby gain access to its market?
Er denne fremgangsmåde ikke i strid med princippet om kapitalens frie bevægelighed?
Does action of this kind not infringe the principles of free movement of capital?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5932/09
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5932/09
Om: Distribution af lægemidler
Subject: Distribution of pharmaceuticals
I Skotland har lægemiddelproducenters indførelse af en ordning med kun én forhandler ført til, at de nationale sundhedsmyndigheder ikke kan udlevere medicin til patienter, især sidst på måneden, på grund af kvoter.
The introduction by pharmaceutical producers of a single-distributor arrangement in Scotland has resulted in the National Health Service (NHS) being unable to provide medication to patients, particularly at the end of the month, owing to quotas.
Så længe apotekerne havde mulighed for at anvende forskellige leverandører og forhandlere, havde de en alternativ løsning, hvis noget gik galt.
Having the option of using different stockists and distributors gave pharmacies a back-up should anything go wrong.
På trods af garantier for, at for udleveringen af medicin til patienter ikke vil blive afbrudt, forekommer det at være i strid med artikel 81 i direktiv 2001/83/EF EFT L 311 af 28.11.2001, s. 67 , at en medicinalvirksomhed udpeger en enkelt forhandler.
Despite reassurances that the supply of medicines to patients would not be disrupted, the designation of a sole distributor by a pharmaceutical company appears to contravene Article 81 of Directive 2001/83/EC OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p.
Direktivet fastsætter, at forhandlerne skal sikre »passende og fortsat levering«, hvilket medicinalvirksomheder undlader.
67. ; the directive provides that distributors shall ‘ensure appropriate and continued supplies’, which pharmaceutical companies are failing to do.
Vil Kommissionen træffe foranstaltninger mod virksomheder, der tilsidesætter artikel 81?
Will the Commission take action against companies that disregard Article 81?
Er der planer om at tage lovgivningen op til fornyet overvejelse?
Are there any plans to revisit the legislation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5933/09
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5933/09
Om: Gennemførelse af direktivet om betalingstjenester
Subject: Transposition of the Payment Services Directive
Direktivet om betalingstjenester har til formål at øge konkurrencen og fremme harmoniseret praksis i EU samt formidle betalingerne hurtigere.
The aim of the Payment Services Directive is to boost competition and promote harmonised practices in the EU area, as well as to speed up the transmission of payments.
I Finland er direktivet om betalingstjenester ved at blive gennemført ved hjælp af love om betalingsinstitutter og betalingstjenester.
In Finland the Payment Services Directive is being transposed by means of laws on payment institutions and services.
De love, som tager udgangspunkt i et direktiv, der bygger på forholdene i bankverdenen, er i Finland ved at true fremtiden for de praktiske og meget anvendte mobiletjenester.
These laws, based on a directive devised for the banking sector, are endangering the future of practical and much-used mobile phone services in Finland.
I Finland kan man anvende mobilt udstyr til mange tjenester, f.eks. til at købe billetter til lokal transport og modtage dem på mobiltelefonen samt til at udbyde teletjenester, f.eks. ved at købet af varen er medregnet i teletjenesten pris, hvorved man ved hjælp af en telefonopringning kan få produktet fra en automat (f.eks. en flaske læskedrik).
In Finland it is possible to use mobiles for many services, for example to purchase local travel tickets and receive them on one’s mobile phone, and to offer telecommunications services which enable the purchase of goods to be included in the price of the telecommunications service, so that is possible to obtain a vending machine product (e.g. a soft drink) by means of a phone call.
Myndighederne har også benyttet muligheden for at bruge betalbare telekommunikationstjenester i deres ekstratjenester (f.eks. det finske centrale køretøjregisters registreringsforespørgsler om køretøjer).
Certain authorities have also taken advantage of the opportunity of charging for mobile messaging for the use of their ancillary services (e.g. vehicle registration inquiries to the Finnish Vehicle Administration).
Disse nye anvendelsesmuligheder er nye tjenester, som er skabt via informationssamfundet, og er til fordel for borgerne.
These new applications are new services of benefit to the citizen which have arisen thanks to the development of the Information Society.
Gennemførelsen af direktivet om betalingstjenester i Finland vil formodentlig skabe et betydeligt behov for at ændre teleselskabernes systemer og aftaler.
The transposition of the Payment Services Directive in Finland might require major changes in telecommunications companies’ systems and contracts.
Myndighedernes fortolkning af gennemførelsen indebærer, at nogle af informationssamfundets avancerede teletjenester vil komme til at høre ind under direktivet og truer med at bringe teleoperatørerne i en meget vanskelig situation, med en dobbelt og delvist modsigende regulering, og de vil blive tvunget til at foretage ændringer i adskillige faktureringssystemer og andre systemer.
The authorities’ interpretation of transposition, whereby some advanced Information Society telecommunications services fall within the scope of the directive, risks placing telecommunications operators in a very tricky position: they would be covered by two sets of partially conflicting rules, and they would be subject to a number of changes to invoicing and other systems.
Mener Kommissionen, at man i forbindelse med gennemførelsen på nationalt plan kan eller bør lade teletjenesterne i deres helhed blive uden for betalingstjenestedirektivets anvendelsesområde?
Does the Commission consider that, in the course of transposition at national level, telecommunications services could or should remain entirely outside the scope of the Payment Services Directive?
Eller bør en eventuel gennemførelse, som vedrører visse teletjenester, foretages i lovgivningen om telekommunikation, for at man bedre kan tage hensyn til telesektorens særlige karakteristika og undgå dobbeltregulering?
Or should any transposition regarding certain telecommunications services take place in the context of legislation on messaging, thus making it possible to take better account of the specific features of the telecoms sector and avoid duplicating regulation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5934/09
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5934/09
Et skift til kommissæren med ansvar for undervisning, uddannelse, kultur og ungdom ville fuldstændig ændre dets muligheder og give nye chancer.
A shift to the portfolio of the Commissioner responsible for Education, Training, Culture and Youth would totally change its scope and afford new opportunities.
Mener Kommissionen, det ville være muligt at flytte Europaskolesystemet til ansvarsområdet for den nye kommissær for undervisning, uddannelse, kultur og ungdom?
Does the Commission think it might be possible to shift the European School system to the portfolio of the new Commissioner for Education, Training, Culture and Youth?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5950/09
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5950/09
Om: Indsats for at undgå sammenblanding af EU's og Europarådets organer efter Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstols dom vedrørende krucifikser i italienske klasseværelser
Subject: Measures for preventing confusion between EU and Council of Europe institutions following the ECHR judgment on crucifixes in Italian classrooms
Den 3. november 2009 gav Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol en italiensk borger klagemedhold, idet den fastslog, at krucifikser, der hænger i klasseværelser, krænker forældrenes ret til at opdrage deres børn ud fra deres overbevisning og krænker elevernes religionsfrihed.
On 3 November 2009, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg upheld the appeal of an Italian national, holding that the presence of crucifixes in school classrooms was a violation of parents’ rights to educate their children in accordance with their beliefs and a violation of pupils’ freedom of religion.
Denne dom har fremkaldt kritik fra forskellige institutioner og civilsamfundet i Italien, som påberåber sig friheden til at ophænge religiøse symboler, der refererer til Italiens og Europas religiøse, kulturelle og historiske tradition.
This judgment has given rise to criticism from Italian institutions and civil society, which have claimed the freedom to display religious symbols that embody Italian and European religious, cultural and historic traditions.
Kommissionen selv har med sin formand Barroso som talsmand ganske vist ikke kommenteret dommen, men gjort opmærksom på medlemsstaternes enekompetence i dette spørgsmål og understreget, hvor vigtige Europas kristne rødder er.
The Commission itself, in the person of President Barroso, whilst not commenting on the judgment and insisting on the Member States' sole competence in this area, has underlined the importance of Europe's Christian roots.
Endvidere har de italienske borgeres udbredte sammenblanding af Europarådet og EU samt det faktum, at Strasbourg er hjemsted for såvel Menneskerettighedsdomstolen som Europa-Parlamentet, bidraget til at øge den modvillige indstilling over for EU og dens institutioner, der opfattes som samfundsfjerne og uvillige til at anerkende den italienske befolknings kulturelle rødder.
Furthermore, the fact that many Italians confuse the Council of Europe with the European Union and that the ECHR and the European Parliament both have their seat in Strasbourg has fostered negative attitudes towards the EU and its institutions, which are perceived as being distant and unwilling to recognise the Italian people’s cultural roots.
Dette er blot det seneste af talrige eksempler på domme og afgørelser fra Europarådets organer, som de europæiske borgere fejlagtigt henfører til EU. —
this is only the most recent of numerous examples of judgments and decisions handed down by Council of Europe bodies being falsely attributed to the EU by European citizens; —
I den offentlige debat er det mange gange blevet overvejet at få fastlagt et samlet hjemsted for Europa-Parlamentet i Bruxelles, hvilket desuden ville betyde en mærkbar besparelse på offentlige midler.
the idea of having Brussels as the sole seat of the European Parliament — which would incidentally save a considerable amount of public money — has already been discussed several times;
Kan Rådet på den baggrund oplyse,
can the Council say whether: 1.
1. om det for at undgå en udbredelse af de Europa-skeptiske anskuelser agter at foreslå at flytte Europarådets organer fra Strasbourg, eller om det som et alternativ agter at fremme en revision af traktaterne med henblik på at give Europa-Parlamentet et samlet hjemsted i Bruxelles?
in order to avoid the spread of eurosceptic feeling, it intends to propose moving the seat of Council of Europe institutions away from Strasbourg, or alternatively, to support a Treaty revision which would make Brussels the only seat of the European Parliament; 2.
2. om det for at afværge yderligere sammenblanding af Europarådet og EU agter at fremme en særlig oplysningskampagne vedrørende institutionerne, som vil kunne hjælpe de europæiske borgere med bedre at forstå de europæiske institutioners rolle og funktioner?
in order to prevent further confusion between the Council of Europe and the European Union, it intends to promote a targeted institutional communication campaign to help European citizens better to understand the role and responsibilities of the European institutions?
Rådet minder om, at Europarådets hjemsted blev fastlagt ved artikel 11 i dets statut, der blev undertegnet den 5. maj 1949 i London.
The Council recalls that the seat of the Council of Europe was established by Article 11 of its Statute signed in London on 5 May 1949.
Derfor skal medlemmerne af Europarådet vedtage en afgørelse om det spørgsmål, det ærede parlamentsmedlem henviser til.
Therefore, it is for the members of the Council of Europe to adopt a decision on the matter referred to by the Honourable Member.
Det ærede parlamentsmedlem gøres også opmærksom på, at EU‑institutionernes hjemsted i henhold til artikel 341 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde fastlægges ved overenskomst mellem medlemsstaternes regeringer.
The Honourable Member is also informed that, under Article 341 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, the seat of the EU institutions is determined by common accord of the governments of its Member States.
Desuden gøres det ærede parlamentsmedlem opmærksom på, at Rådet jævnligt redegør for forskellene mellem Den Europæiske Unions institutioner og Europarådet i forbindelse med informations- og kommunikationsvirksomhed, som dets generalsekretariat udøver.
Moreover, the Honourable Member is informed that the differences between the European Union institutions and the Council of Europe are regularly explained by the Council in the information and communication activities carried out by its General Secretariat.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5951/09
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5951/09
Om: Plukning eller høst af fjer fra levende gæs
Subject: Plucking and harvesting feathers from live geese
I et svar på en skriftlig forespørgsel fra min kollega Frieda Brepoels ( E-4690/09 ) meddelte Kommissionen, at den vil bringe spørgsmålet om høst af fjer fra levende gæs op under mødet i december i det stående udvalg for den europæiske konvention om beskyttelse af dyr, der holdes til landbrugsformål;
In answer to the written question tabled by my colleague Frieda Brepoels ( E-4690/09 ), the Commission stated that it would raise the issue of harvesting feathers from live geese during the meeting in December of the Standing Committee of the European Convention for the protection of animals kept for farming purposes.
Kan Kommissionen inden dette møde meddele, hvad den præcist vil foretage sig vedrørende dette spørgsmål?
Can the Commission inform me, before that meeting begins, exactly what position it will be adopting at the meeting?
Har Kommissionen fået afklaret, hvorvidt det er muligt at høste fjer fra levende gæs uden at dyrene udsættes for smerte eller påføres skade?
Has the Commission already established whether it is possible to harvest feathers from live geese without causing them pain, distress or injury?
Såfremt dette skulle være muligt, hvorledes kan dyrevelfærdskontrollen da kontrollere om fjer bliver høstet eller plukket?
If it is possible, how can animal welfare inspectors check whether feathers are being harvested or plucked?
Bliver det ikke svært at kontrollere om forbuddet mod plukning af fjer fra levende fugle bliver overholdt, hvis høst af fjer er tilladt?
If harvesting of feathers is permitted, does this not make it very difficult to monitor compliance with the ban on plucking live birds?
Hvorledes kontrollerer Kommissionen kvaliteten af kontrollen af dyrevelfærd i de EU-medlemsstater, hvor man kan få fjer fra levende gæs?
How does the Commission monitor the quality of animal welfare inspections in the EU Member States where feathers are obtained from live geese?
Støtter Kommissionen forslaget fra den nederlandske dyrebeskyttelsesforening om at indføre et europæisk godkendelsesmærke for varer, der indeholder dun www.trouw.nl/groen/nieuws/article2861050.ece/Dierenbescherming_wil_keurmerk_dons.html ?
Does the Commission support the proposal by the Dutch Animal Welfare Organisation that a European certification mark be established for products containing down www.trouw.nl/groen/nieuws/article2861050.ece/Dierenbescherming_wil_keurmerk_dons.html ?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5974/09
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5974/09
Om: Beskrivelse af produktet Fruitflow
Subject: Fruitflow product description
Fruitflow er et patenteret, videnskabeligt testet tomatekstrakt, der modvirker ophobning af blodplader, der er en kendt årsag til hjerteanfald, slagtilfælde og venøs trombose.
Fruitflow is a patented, scientifically proven tomato extract which inhibits platelet aggregation, a known cause of heart attack, stroke and venous thrombosis.
Teknologien, der blev opdaget af Rowett Institute i 1999, er i de seneste år blevet udviklet af Provexis.
Discovered by the Rowett Institute in 1999, the technology has been developed by the Provexis team in recent years.
Dette udviklingsprogram indeholder otte kliniske forsøg (til dato), formel godkendelse i både EU og USA, offentliggørelse af klinisk bevis i velrenommerede videnskabelige tidsskrifter med peer-review og patentbeskyttelse i størstedelen af verden.
This development programme includes eight clinical trials (to date), regulatory clearance in both the EU and USA, the publication of clinical proof in highly regarded peer-review scientific journals, and patent protection in major global territories.
Produktet er forretningsmæssigt parat til at blive anvendt i en lang række levnedsmidler, drikkevarer og kosttilskud.
The product is commercially ready for delivery in a wide range of food, beverage and dietary supplement formats.
Fremtidige områder er under udvikling og omfatter dyb venøs trombose, metabolsk syndrom og type 2-diabetes.
Future claim areas under development include deep vein thrombosis, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.
Den Europæiske Fødevaresikkerhedsautoritet (EFSA) anmodede om en revidering af produktbeskrivelsen med henblik på at gøre produktet mere forståeligt over for forbrugeren.
However, in order to make the product more understandable to the consumer, the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) requested a revision to be made to the product description.
EFSA skal bekræfte den ændrede ordlyd inden for 60 dage, og der er nu gået næsten tre gange så lang tid.
The period within which EFSA is required to confirm this revised wording is 60 days and the period which has now passed is nearly three times this.
Vil Kommissionen oplyse, hvornår denne nye ordlyd vil blive godkendt?
Can I ask the European Commission to clarify when this new wording will be approved?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-5983/09
WRITTEN QUESTION P-5983/09
Om: Udvikling af EU-medlemsstaternes vaccineproduktion
Subject: Developing Member States' vaccine production
Jeg forelagde Kommissionen den 5. maj 2009 en forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse ( E-3599/09 ), hvori jeg bad om oplysninger om EU's beredskab for svineinfluenzaen, der er kendt som luftvejssygdommen A (H1N1), var tilstrækkelig, og om EU's fælles indsats kunne effektiviseres yderligere.
In a written question to the Commission tabled on 5 May 2009 (E‑3599/09) I asked whether the EU was ready to tackle influenza A(H1N1), a respiratory disorder known as swine flu, and whether EU joint action could be made more effective.
Baggrunden for min forespørgsel var Verdenssundhedsorganisationens WHO's daværende vurdering at sygdommen kunne udvikle sig til en pandemi, og at den ville brede sig rundt om i verden.
My question was prompted by the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) assessment at that time, namely that the disease could assume the character of a pandemic and would spread all over the world.
Selv om EU's sundhedsmyndigheders beredskab til håndtering af en pandemi generelt anses for godt, har medlemsstaterne meget forskellige beredskaber for dette.
Although EU health authorities were generally considered well prepared to cope with a pandemic, the degrees of readiness varied greatly in the Member States.
Svineinfluenzaens virus er en vis afart af fugleinfluenzavirussen, som blev udbredt i Europa allerede i 1970'erne, og er for øjeblikket den hyppigste dyresygdom i Europa.
The virus which causes swine flu is a mutant of the bird flu virus, which became widespread in Europe back in the 1970s; bird flu infection is now a common animal disease in Europe.
Det er afgørende at sikre den nødvendige medicin parallelt med de generelle sikkerhedsforanstaltninger.
The essential thing, besides general precautions, is to ensure that the necessary medicines are available.
Da virussen er en type, som ændrer sig hurtigt, er det stadig muligt, at den bliver endnu farligere.
Given that the virus is of a rapidly mutating type, it may yet turn into something even more dangerous.