natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006687/2011
Question for written answer E-006687/2011
Om: Øget sikkerhed i forbindelse med europæiske atomkraftværker
Subject: Enhanced safety at European nuclear plants
Atomulykken i Fukushima har gjort det nødvendigt at revidere de gældende mekanismer og bestemmelser inden for atomsektoren.
The nuclear disaster at Fukushima calls for a review of the nuclear sector's current standards and mechanisms.
FN har implicit gjort opmærksom på en række mangler i forbindelse med de forskellige atomkraftværker i verden.
The UN agency thus implicitly acknowledged the deficiencies which have been detected in world nuclear safety.
Globalt set findes der på nuværende tidspunkt 440 funktionsdygtige atomkraftværker, men der er ikke indført obligatoriske sikkerhedsstandarder eller kontrolsystemer på internationalt plan.
At present, there are 440 nuclear plants in operation worldwide, but there are no international safety standards, nor is there any compulsory monitoring system.
Hvert enkelt land er ansvarlig for atomsikkerheden, og IAEA udsteder kun henstillinger.
The IAEA only issues recommendations, with each state being responsible for its own nuclear safety.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at de europæiske atomkraftværker bør overholde samme obligatoriske sikkerhedsstandarder for dermed at sikre EU‑borgerne samme sikkerhedsniveau?
Does the Commission agree that European nuclear plants should all meet the same obligatory safety standards, in order to guarantee the same level of safety for all of Europe's citizens?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at alle medlemsstater med funktionsdygtige atomkraftværker bør lade eksperter fra IAEA foretage systematiske og uanmeldte inspektioner med henblik på at undersøge de enkelte atomkraftværkers sikkerhedsniveau?
Does the Commission consider that in order to monitor safety levels in each nuclear plant, all Member States should agree to allow systematic, random checks by the IAEA?
Det nuværende advarselssystem er forældet.
The current emergency system is obsolete.
Det blev indført efter ulykken på Tjernobyl i 1986 og før it‑revolutionen.
It was designed post-Chernobyl in 1986, before the advent of information technology.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at der som forebyggende foranstaltning er behov for at indføre et europæisk register over disponibelt udstyr og personale med særlig ekspertise, som hurtigt kan gribe ind i tilfælde af en atomulykke i Europa?
Does the Commission agree that there is an urgent need for a European register of equipment and specially trained personnel able to immediately respond to any nuclear accident in European territory?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at der bør oprettes en europæisk aktionsgruppe, som kan indsættes i tilfælde af en ulykke?
Does the Commission consider that a European rapid response group should be set up, to be deployed in situ in the event of an accident?
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe i den henseende?
How does the Commission intend to address this matter?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006688/2011
Question for written answer E-006688/2011
Om: Mobiltelefoniudbyderes netovervågning i Europa
Subject: Network monitoring by mobile phone operators in Europe
I Nederlandene bliver netneutralitet for første gang fastlagt ved lov.
The Netherlands has become the first country in Europe to prescribe net neutrality by law.
Indgreb i datanettet er dermed udelukket.
Operators are therefore not allowed to interfere with network traffic.
De enkelte datapakker bliver behandlet ens og er ikke underlagt ekstragebyrer for f.eks. internettelefoni eller andre chatapplikationer.
Individual data packages are treated equally and are not subject to additional charges, for example, for Internet phone services or other chat applications.
Ifølge aviserne skal det statslige nederlandske mobiltelefoniselskab KPN overvåge al trafik på nettet efter at have noteret et kraftigt fald i omsætningen bl.a. i forbindelse med sms-beskeder.
According to newspaper reports, the Dutch state-owned mobile phone company KPN is monitoring all network traffic after recording a slump in sales in, among things, text messages.
Brugerne skal have benyttet gratis applikationer i stedet for de gebyrpligtige sms-beskeder.
Users have reportedly been using free applications to send text messages rather than paying to send them via their network provider.
Har en sådan dataovervågning fra mobiltelefonioperatørers side fundet sted i andre europæiske lande hidtil?
Has this kind of data monitoring already been undertaken by mobile phone operators in other Member States?
Bliver det undersøgt?
Has a study been conducted on this subject?
Hvad agter Kommissionen at gøre i denne sag for at sikre netneutraliteten?
What action will the Commission take in this area to ensure net neutrality?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006689/2011
Question for written answer E-006689/2011
Om: Arbejdet udført af TAG
Subject: Tag Works
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en velgørende organisation i min valgkreds ved navn TAG, som arbejder for at bekæmpe arbejdsløsheden blandt unge, der ikke er under uddannelse eller i beskæftigelse (NEET).
I have been contacted by a charity in my constituency called TAG, which works to tackle unemployment amongst young people not in employment, education and training (NEETs).
Flere oplysninger findes på denne side: http://www.tagworks.org/.
Further information can be found here: http://www.tagworks.org/
TAG forsøger at få adgang til finansiering af fire specifikke projekttyper: —
TAG is looking to access funding for four specific types of projects: —
uddannelse af unge, der ikke er under uddannelse eller i beskæftigelse, og forberedelse af de unge på at komme i beskæftigelse, —
Training NEETs and preparing them for employment. —
uddannelse før beskæftigelse og kompetenceudvikling, —
Pre-employment training and skills development. —
mentorarbejde og beskæftigelsesstøtte én gang i løbet af et program, —
Mentoring and employment support once in a programme. —
udvikling af planer for unge, der ikke er under uddannelse eller i beskæftigelse.
Development for NEET schemes.
Kan Kommissionen rådgive mig om, hvorvidt der findes EU‑støttemidler, der er tilgængelige for denne velgørenhedsorganisation?
Could the Commission advise me on whether there is any EU funding available for this charity?
Hvordan kan denne værdifulde velgørende organisation i bekræftende fald ansøge om disse støttemidler?
If so, how can this worthwhile charity apply for such funding?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006690/2011
Question for written answer E-006690/2011
Om: Shaminder Singh
Subject: Shaminder Singh
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger vedrørende sagen om Shaminder Singh — en dreng, der tilsyneladende var den eneste i byen Bagguwal i Nawanshahardistriket (Indien), der praktiserede sikhisme.
I have been contacted by a constituent about the case of Shaminder Singh, a young boy who apparently was the only practising Sikh in the village of Bagguwal in Nawanshahar district (India).
Vælgeren har fortalt mig, at Shaminder blev arresteret af politiet den 31. oktober 2010 og slået nådesløst og udsat for tortur i 18 dage, fordi han nægtede at tilstå at have været indblandet i voldshandlinger mod den indiske stat.
My constituent tells me that Shaminder was arrested by police on 31 October 2010 and was mercilessly beaten and subjected to torture for 18 days because he refused to confess to any involvement in violence against the state of India.
Min vælger har forklaret, at Shaminder flygtede fra politiets varetægt den 18. november, efter at han overhørte politibetjente sige, at han skulle henrettes, men han blev senere arresteret i Patna, hvor han afslørede, at han var offer for polititortur.
My constituent explains that Shaminder escaped from police custody on 18 November after he overheard police officers say that he was to be executed, but was later arrested in Patna, where he revealed that he was a victim of police torture.
Tilsyneladende tvang en rapport i »Hindustan Times« den 3. december 2010 Punjab- og Haryanahøjesteretten til at tage affære, og efter en undersøgelse beordrede domstolen den 3. januar 2011 delstaten Punjab til at betale en bøde for Shaminders fængsling og tortur og til at holde øje med ham.
Apparently, a report in the ‘Hindustan Times’ of 3 December 2010 forced the Punjab and Haryana High Court into action and, following an investigation, the court ordered the state of Punjab on 3 January 2011 to pay a penalty for Shaminder's incarceration and torture and to look after him.
Min vælger har sagt, at Shaminder blev angrebet i Bagguwal den 17. januar 2011 af ca. 10 uidentificerede mænd med skarpe våben, hvorefter han blev bragt til hospitalet, hvor han døde af sine kvæstelser flere dage senere.
My constituent says that on 17 January 2011 Shaminder was attacked by approximately 10 unidentified men with sharp-edged weapons in the village of Bagguwal, after which he was admitted to hospital, where he died from his injuries several days later.
Min vælger har informeret mig om, at eftersom offentligheden mener, at politiet har ansvaret for denne forbrydelse, beordrede Punjabregeringen den 30. januar 2011 en dybtgående undersøgelse af de omstændigheder, der førte til Shaminders død.
My constituent informs me that since public opinion believes that the police are responsible for this crime, the Punjab government ordered a probe on 30 January 2011 into the circumstances leading to Shaminder's death.
Har den kendskab til denne sag? 2.
if it is aware of this case; 2.
Har den drøftelser med den indiske regering og/eller Punjabregeringen om denne sag og lignende sager? 3.
if it is in discussion with the Indian and/or Punjab Government concerning this case and similar cases; 3.
Hvilket pres lægger den på den nationale regering og delstatsregeringerne med henblik på at beskytte menneskerettighederne for sikherne i regionen?
what pressure it is putting on the national and state governments to protect the human rights of Sikhs in the region?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006691/2011
Question for written answer E-006691/2011
Om: Professor Davinderpal Singh
Subject: Professor Davinderpal Singh
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006692/2011
Question for written answer E-006692/2011
Om: Udgifter for flypassagerer som følge af ETS
Subject: Cost to airline passengers of ETS
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger, der er bekymret over, hvilke konsekvenser det vil få, at flyselskaberne inddrages i EU's emissionshandelsordning (ETS).
I have been contacted by a constituent who is concerned about the impact of extending the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) to airlines on the cost of air travel for ordinary passengers.
Har Kommissionen udarbejdet en kvantitativ konsekvensanalyse vedrørende udgifterne for passagererne, hvis ETS indføres?
Has the Commission carried out a quantitative impact assessment on the costs of introducing the ETS to passengers?
Har Kommissionen anslået, hvor meget ETS vil forhøje prisen på flybilletter til både EU‑flyvninger og interkontinentale flyvninger?
Has the Commission estimated how much the ETS will add to the price of an airline ticket for both flights within the EU and intercontinental flights?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om flyselskaberne vil være forpligtet til at angive udgifterne til ETS sammen med de andre afgifter, når passagererne køber deres billetter?
Can the Commission confirm whether or not airlines will be required to display the cost of the ETS alongside other charges when passengers buy their tickets?
Kan Kommissionen angive en liste over, hvilke EU‑medlemsstater der har til hensigt at reducere deres hjemlige flypassagerafgifter for helt eller delvist at kompensere for udgifterne ved at indføre ETS?
Is the Commission able to produce a list of which EU Member States intend to reduce their domestic Air Passenger Duty (APD) to either fully or partially offset the cost of introducing the ETS?
Kan Kommissionen angive de medlemsstater, der endnu ikke har offentliggjort planer om at kompensere for udgifterne til ETS?
Is the Commission able to name the EU Member States which have not yet announced plans to offset the cost of ETS?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006693/2011
Question for written answer E-006693/2011
Om: Kompensation fra Iberia Airlines
Subject: Iberia Airlines compensation
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger, som oplyser, at han i øjeblikket er i strid med Iberia Airlines, efter at han strandede i Madrid i fem dage i april 2010 på grund af askeskyen.
I have been contacted by a constituent who informs me that he is currently in a dispute with Iberia Airlines after he was stranded in Madrid for five days in April 2010 due to the volcanic ash cloud.
Iberia nægter at betale hans udgifter for denne periode, selv om han siger, at han var nødt til at bruge yderligere 1 000 GBP i løbet af de fem dage.
Iberia is refusing to pay his expenses claim for this period even though he says that he had to spend an additional GBP 1 000 during the five days.
Vælgeren har oplyst, at omkostningerne forbundet med flyvningen er blevet refunderet, og at Iberia har indrømmet erstatningsansvar for hoteludgifterne.
My constituent tells me that the cost of the flight has been refunded and that Iberia has admitted liability for the hotel cost.
De nægter dog ganske simpelt at give ham kompensation.
However, they simply refuse to reimburse him.
Vælgeren har forklaret, at han fik besked på at sende kvitteringerne til Iberia i Spanien for at modtage refusion, og det gjorde han med anbefalet brev.
My constituent explains that he was told to send the receipts to Iberia in Spain to receive reimbursement, which he did by recorded delivery.
Efter at kvitteringerne blev registreret som modtaget i Spanien, forsøgte vælgeren at opnå telefonisk kontakt med Iberia, men han har ikke været i stand til at komme igennem til skadeafdelingen.
After the receipts were recorded as received in Spain, my constituent tried to contact Iberia by phone but has been unsuccessful in getting through to the claims department.
Vælgeren har også kontaktet Air Transport Users Council i Storbritannien, som derefter tog kontakt til Iberia.
My constituent also contacted the Air Transport Users Council in the UK, who then contacted Iberia.
Vælgeren modtog imidlertid ikke noget svar fra Iberia.
However, my constituent did not receive a reply from Iberia.
Da han fik fat på dem i december, hævdede de imidlertid, at det ikke fremgik af deres fortegnelser, at de havde modtaget de dokumenter, han havde sendt dem.
However, when he chased them up in December they claimed to have no record of having received the documents he sent them.
Vælgeren har oplyst, at han har sendt dokumenterne igen, og at Ministerio de Fomento har bekræftet, at det har modtaget dem.
My constituent tells me that he sent the documents again and that the Ministerio de Fomento confirmed receipt of them.
Da han bad om en opdatering vedrørende sagen, nægtede de imidlertid at give ham et sagsnummer, og de svarer ikke længere på hans e‑mails.
However, when he asked for an update they refused to give him a case number and no longer respond to his emails.
Handler Iberia i strid med EU‑retten, når selskabet nægter at refundere disse yderligere udgifter for vælgeren? 2.
whether Iberia is in breach of EC law by refusing to reimburse this additional cost to my constituent; 2.
Handler Ministerio de Fomento i strid med EU‑retten, når den nægter at hjælpe vælgeren? 3.
whether the Ministerio de Fomento is in breach of EC law by refusing to help my constituent; 3.
Hvem kan vælgeren kontakte, så han langt om længe kan modtage den berettigede kompensation?
who my constituent can approach to finally receive the compensation he is due?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006694/2011
Question for written answer E-006694/2011
Om: Den serbiske straffelov og ejendomsretten
Subject: The Serbian Criminal Code and property rights
Der findes troværdige indikationer på, at dele af Serbiens straffelov — nemlig anvendelsen af artikel 359 (embedsmisbrug) vedrørende forvaltningen af private virksomheder og reglerne om frihedsberøvelse forud for domsafsigelse — ikke er i overensstemmelse med retsstatsprincippet.
There are credible indications that parts of Serbia’s Criminal Code — namely the application of Article 359 (abuse of office) to the management of private companies, and the rules on pre‑trial detention — are not compatible with the principles of the rule of law.
Den serbiske statssekretær for retlige anliggender, Slobodan Homen, har for nylig udtalt, at der vil blive foretaget ændringer på disse områder på baggrund af anbefalinger fra EU.
The Serbian State Secretary for Justice, Slobodan Homen, has recently stated that there will be changes in this area following recommendations from the EU.
De serbiske myndigheder har desuden været langsomme til at klarlægge visse sager mod enkeltpersoner — Djordjevićsagen er et eksempel herpå.
Furthermore, the Serbian authorities have been slow in clarifying certain cases brought against individuals — the Djordjević case being an example.
Sådanne sager understreger, hvor usikker investeringsklimaet er i Serbien, især med hensyn til privatisering, og sagerne giver anledning til bekymring om retssystemets uafhængighed.
Cases such as these highlight the insecurity of the investment climate in Serbia, particularly with regard to privatisation, and raise concerns about the independence of the justice system.
Har Kommissionen udpeget konkrete bestemmelser i den serbiske straffelov, som den finder problematiske og uforenelige med retsstatsprincippet?
Has the Commission identified certain provisions of the Serbian Criminal Code as problematic and incompatible with the principles of the rule of law?
Hvilke bestemmelser er der i bekræftende fald tale om?
If so, which provisions?
Hvordan og inden for hvilken tidsramme agter Kommissionen at overvåge den udvikling, som statssekretæren for retlige anliggender har omtalt, især vedrørende de igangværende sager baseret på artikel 359?
How and in what timeframe does the Commission intend to monitor the developments announced by the State Secretary for Justice, in particular in relation to ongoing cases based on Article 359?
Vil Kommissionen behandle disse områder i sin udtalelse om Serbien, som forventes at blive offentliggjort i oktober 2011?
Will these areas be addressed in the Commission opinion about Serbia expected in October 2011?
Hvilke skridt overvejer Kommissionen at tage for at sikre, at beskyttelsen af private investorers ejendomsrettigheder i Serbien bringes i overensstemmelse med EU‑standarderne?
What steps is the Commission considering to ensure that implementation of the protection of private investors’ property rights in Serbia is brought into line with EU standards?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006695/2011
Question for written answer E-006695/2011
Franziska Keller (Verts/ALE) , Tatjana Ždanoka (Verts/ALE) , Hélène Flautre (Verts/ALE) , Judith Sargentini (Verts/ALE) , Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE) og Jean Lambert (Verts/ALE)
Franziska Keller (Verts/ALE) , Tatjana Ždanoka (Verts/ALE) , Hélène Flautre (Verts/ALE) , Judith Sargentini (Verts/ALE) , Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE) and Jean Lambert (Verts/ALE)
Om: Kommissionens evaluering af tilbagetagelsesaftaler
Subject: Commission evaluation of readmission agreements
I februar 2011 offentliggjorde Kommissionen sin første evaluering af de tilbagetagelsesaftaler, som EU har indgået, eller som der bliver forhandlet om.
In February 2011 the Commission released its first evaluation of the readmission agreements which have been concluded by the European Union or on which negotiations are underway.
Har alle EU‑medlemsstater allerede gennemført bestemmelserne i tilbagesendelsesdirektivet (2008/115/EF) i den nationale lovgivning?
Have all the EU Member States already transposed the provisions of the Return Directive (2008/115/EC) into national law?
Hvilke løsninger eller alternativer foreslår Kommissionen som svar på det opståede problem, at der mangler midler til at kunne forhandle tilbagetagelsesaftalerne? 4.
What solution or alternative does the Commission propose in response to the problem that has been raised of a shortage of funding for negotiating readmission agreements?
Tilbagetagelsesaftaler er bindende for begge parter, men evalueringen omhandler ikke tilbagetagelse til EU.
Readmission agreements are binding on both sides, yet the evaluation does not assess readmission to the EU.
Hvor mange EU‑borgere er blevet sendt tilbage til EU i henhold til tilbagetagelsesaftalerne?
How many EU citizens have been returned to the EU under a readmission agreement?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006696/2011
Question for written answer E-006696/2011
Om: Rovdrift på havbars
Subject: Overfishing of sea-bass
Fiskeriet efter havbars er meget udbredt i nogle EU‑farvande.
Fishing for sea-bass is extremely widespread in certain Community waters.
Bestandens tilstand i Den Engelske Kanal er meget foruroligende.
Stocks of this species in the Channel have reached worryingly low levels.
Man har allerede i nogle år ment, at visse pelagiske trawlere ikke overholder reglerne for fiskeri.
It is thought that some pelagic trawlers have not been adhering to fishing rules for some years now.
Ikke blot overholdes fiskekvoten på fem tons havbars om ugen, der er fastsat i loven om erhvervsfiskeri, ikke, fiskerne benytter sig ifølge mine oplysninger også af krumspring for at undgå kontrol.
Not only is the quota of five tonnes per week for sea-bass prescribed by the law on commercial fishing not being observed, but, according to our sources, fishermen are using ploys to avoid inspections.
Tallene taler for sig selv, da man mener, at 90 % af de observerede pelagiske trawlere ikke lander deres fangster på auktioner.
The figures speak for themselves: it is thought that 90 % of the pelagic trawlers being monitored do not sell their catches through official auctions.
De økonomiske følger er ikke blot af økologisk art, men også af økonomisk art. Virkningerne er mange: —
The detrimental effects of this are not only environmental, but economic: —
De store mængder, der fanges, ender med at mætte markedet for havbars, hvilket resulterer i en fordrejet konkurrence på det europæiske marked —
the large quantities caught end up saturating the sea-bass market, which in turn distorts competition on the European market, —
bestanden falder gradvist —
stocks are progressively decreasing, and —
økosystemerne ødelægges.
ecosystems are being destroyed.
I lyset af denne foruroligende konstatering, overvejes det så at gennemføre en undersøgelse af havbarsfiskeriet?
Given this worrying state of affairs, is a study on sea-bass fishing and stock levels likely to be carried out?
Er der mulighed for en biologisk hvilkeperiode for arten i gydesæsonen?
Would it be possible to enforce biological recovery periods for sea-bass during the spawning season?
Kan Kommissionen præcisere, hvilke midler den agter at iværksætte for at bekæmpe rovdrift på denne art?
Could the Commission outline the measures it intends to implement to combat overfishing of sea-bass?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-006697/2011
Question for written answer E-006697/2011
Om: Ekstraordinære foranstaltninger til fordel for frugt- og grøntsagssektoren
Subject: Emergency measures for the fruit and vegetables sector
Producenterne af frugt og grøntsager gennemlever i øjeblikket en krise, hvis alvor er uden fortilfælde i denne sektor.
The crisis now affecting fruit and vegetables growers is of a gravity unprecedented in the sector.
Eftersom EU's landbrugere ifølge de foreløbige skøn fra de europæiske landbrugsorganisationer forventes at lide økonomiske tab i størrelsesordenen 500‑600 mio. EUR, vil de ekstraordinære foranstaltninger til støtte af frugt- og grøntsagssektoren ikke være tilstrækkelige til at erstatte de kriseramte producenter.
Given that European farmers' associations' preliminary estimates point to financial losses for farmers in the EU in the region of EUR 500-600 million, the exceptional temporary measures in support of the fruit and vegetables sector will not suffice to compensate the producers affected by the crisis.