natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Planlægger Kommissionen, som den har gjort det i tidligere frihandelsaftaler, at medtage en bestemmelse i frihandelsaftalen mellem EU og Japan, som forpligter parterne til en effektiv gennemførelse af multilaterale miljøaftaler (MEA'er) såsom CITES?
Does the Commission plan, as it has done in recent FTAs, to include a provision in the EU‑Japan FTA committing parties to effective implementation of Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) such as CITES?
Overvejer Kommissionen derudover at medtage en bestemmelse om håndhævelse af MEA'er?
Would the Commission also consider including a provision on enforcement of MEAs?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012354/2011
Question for written answer E-012354/2011
I december 2011 meddelte Polen, at landet ville øge reguleringen af importen af el fra vind- og solenergi fra Tyskland.
In December 2011, Poland announced its intention to regulate imports of wind and solar power from Germany more strictly.
Den polske netoperatør PSE ville oprette strømspærringer ved grænsen til Tyskland ved hjælp af såkaldte faseregulatorer.
The Polish network operator PSE Operator reportedly wants to install phase shifters on the German border to regulate the flow of electricity into Poland.
Mens den polske netoperatør frygter, at de polske net vil blive overbelastet af for store leveringer af strøm fra Tyskland, mener Tyskland, at en strømspærring kan give Tyskland problemer med at fordele overskudsenergien i det interne tyske net.
It fears that the Polish grid will not be able to withstand excessive surges in the flow of electricity from Germany; Germany meanwhile fears problems in distributing excess energy around its national grid.
Mener Rådet, at de strømspærringer, som Polen vil oprette, er en overtrædelse af reglerne for det europæiske indre marked?
Does the Council regard Poland’s proposal to install regulators as a breach of the single market rules?
Hvis Polen opretter strømspærringer, hvilke konsekvenser ser Rådet så for EU's opstillede klima- og energimål?
In the Council’s view, what implications would the introduction by Poland of power inflow regulators have for the European Union’s climate and energy goals?
Det Europæiske Råd bekræftede igen i sine konklusioner fra marts 2007 behovet for at forbedre den grænseoverskridende regionale udveksling og fremskynde udviklingen af det regionale energisamarbejde, idet der tages hensyn til integrationen af vedvarende energikilder på land såvel som på havet.
In its conclusions of March 2007 the European Council reaffirmed the need for improved regional cross-border exchange and accelerating the development of regional energy cooperation, taking into account the integration of on- and off-shore renewable energies.
Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 714/2009 af 13. juli 2009 om betingelserne for netadgang i forbindelse med grænseoverskridende elektricitetsudveksling EUT L 211 af 14.8.2009. skal sikre, at elektricitetstransmissionsnettet forvaltes optimalt, og at der åbnes mulighed for elektricitetshandel og elektricitetsforsyning på tværs af grænserne i Den Europæiske Union gennem et europæisk net af transmissionssystemoperatører for elektricitet.
Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 of 13 July 2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity OJ L 211, 14.8.2009. aims to ensure optimal management of the electricity transmission network and to allow trading and supplying electricity across borders in the European Union, through a European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity.
Senere opfordrede Det Europæiske Råd i februar 2011 til gennemførelsen af et fuldt fungerende, sammenkoblet og integreret marked for energi senest i 2014, og anførte, at ingen EU‑medlemsstater bør være isoleret i forhold til de europæiske gas- og elnet efter 2015.
More recently, the February 2011 European Council called for the completion of a fully functioning, interconnected and integrated internal energy market by 2014, and stated that no EU Member State should remain isolated from the European gas and electricity networks after 2015.
Rådet støtter stadig den videre udvikling og brug af energi fra vedværende energikilder i EU, herunder via gennemførelsen af direktivet om vedvarende energi 2009/28/EF, og står stadig ved sine klima- og energimål.
The Council continues to support the further development and use of energy from renewable sources in the EU, including through the implementation of the ‘Renewables Directive’ 2009/28/EC, and continues to stand by its climate and energy goals.
Imidlertid er det Kommissionen, der efterprøver, om EU‑lovgivningen gennemføres og anvendes korrekt i medlemsstaterne.
Nevertheless, it is for the Commission to verify the correct implementation and application of EU legislation in the Member States.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012355/2011
Question for written answer E-012355/2011
Om: Definition af »selvforsyning« i forbindelse med blodpræparater
Subject: Definition of ‘self-sufficiency’ in relation to blood products
I 2011 berettede Kommissionen i anden rapport om frivillig og vederlagsfri afgivelse af blod og blodkomponenter (KOM(2011)0138), at kun 13 af de lande, der blev adspurgt af Kommissionen, har defineret begrebet »selvforsyning af blod og blodkomponenter«.
In 2011 the Commission reported (in document COM(2011)138, ‘Second report on voluntary and unpaid donation of blood and blood components’) that only 13 of the countries to which it had sent a questionnaire had defined the concept of self-sufficiency in blood and blood components.
Har Kommissionen selv en definition af »selvforsyning af blod og blodkomponenter«?
Does the Commission have its own definition of self-sufficiency in this context?
Hvilke mængder er der brug for at sikre en tilstrækkelig forsyning til befolkningen?
What quantities are necessary, under its definition, to ensure that the population is adequately supplied?
Har Kommissionen oplysninger om, hvilke af de lande, som har en sådan definition, der ikke har nået niveauet for selvforsyning i henhold til denne definition?
Does the Commission have information as to which of the countries that possess a definition of self-sufficiency have failed to achieve it according to that definition?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012356/2011
Question for written answer E-012356/2011
Om: Udvekslingssystem til blod og blodkomponenter
Subject: Exchange system for blood and blood components
I et svar på den skriftlige forespørgsel E‑010598/2011 vedrørende udveksling af blodpræparater i EU anførte Kommissionsmedlemmet John Dalli, at Kommissionen overvejer at bestille en undersøgelse vedrørende behovet for og tilbuddet af blod og blodkomponenter i EU‑medlemsstaterne samt om muligt af graden af selvforsyning og af im- og eksporten.
In his answer to Written Question No E‑010598/2011 on the exchange of blood products within the EU, Commissioner John Dalli stated that the Commission was considering ordering ‘a study on the needs and supplies for blood and blood components in the EU Member States, if possible including the level of self-sufficiency and of import and export’.
Samtidig oplyste Kommissionen, at den ikke er bemyndiget til at oprette et udvekslingssystem til blod og blodkomponenter.
At the same time, the Commission pointed out that it has no mandate to set up an exchange system for blood and blood components.
Hvorvidt opfordrer Kommissionen EU's medlemsstater til at oprette et udvekslingssystem til forsyning med blod og blodkomponenter, når Kommissionen ikke selv har beføjelser hertil?
If the Commission itself has no mandate to set up an exchange system to ensure the supply of blood and blood components, is it encouraging the Member States to do so?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012357/2011
Question for written answer E-012357/2011
Om: Undersøgelse af behov for og udbud af blod og blodkomponenter
Subject: Blood and blood components: needs and supplies study
I sit svar på den skriftlige forespørgsel E‑010598/2011 om udveksling af blodpræparater i EU anførte kommissær John Dalli, at Kommissionen overvejer at bestille en undersøgelse af behov for og udbud af blod og blodkomponenter i EU's medlemsstater og om muligt graden af selvforsyning samt im- og eksport.
In his answer to Written Question No E‑010598/2011 on the exchange of blood products within the EU, Commissioner John Dalli stated that the Commission was considering ordering ‘a study on the needs and supplies for blood and blood components in the EU Member States, if possible including the level of self-sufficiency and of import and export’.
Hvornår skal den undersøgelse, Kommissionen nævner, bestilles?
When is this study to be commissioned?
Inden for hvilken tidsramme skal undersøgelsen gennemføres?
What is the proposed timeframe for it?
Hvornår forventer Kommissionen de første resultater?
When does the Commission expect to have initial findings?
Hvad er Kommissionens intention i forbindelse med overvejelserne om at foretage en sådan undersøgelse?
What is the Commission’s intention in considering such a study?
Hvilke efterfølgende foranstaltninger tager den planlagte undersøgelse sigte på?
What would be the thrust of it in terms of possible follow-up?
Har Kommissionen afhængigt at resultaterne af en sådan undersøgelse allerede planer om konkrete efterfølgende foranstaltninger?
Does the Commission already have specific follow-up measures in mind, depending on the findings?
Hvis Kommissionen ikke selv har beføjelser til at oprette et udvekslingssystem til forsyning med blod og blodkomponenter, i hvilket omfang opfordrer den så EU's medlemsstater hertil?
If the Commission itself has no mandate to set up an exchange system to ensure the supply of blood and blood components, is it encouraging the Member States to do so?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012358/2011
Question for written answer E-012358/2011
Om: Tsunamivarslingssystem for EU's nordlige farvande
Subject: Tsunami early warning system for the EU's northern waters
Ifølge eksperter er tsunamirisikoen ved det europæiske fastlands nordkyst og i områder beliggende i den nordlige del af EU som de britiske, danske og svenske øer ganske vist lille, men den kan alligevel ikke ignoreres, da mange europæiske byer og landsbyer ligger på niveau med havets overflade og tæt på kysten.
Experts consider the risk of a tsunami on the north coast of the EU mainland and in northern waters around the British Isles and the islands of Denmark and Sweden to be slight but warn that this risk should nevertheless not be ignored, since many European villages, towns and cities are located at sea level and close to the coast.
Findes der et tsunamivarslingssystem for EU's nordlige farvande som i dele af Middelhavet?
Is there a tsunami early warning system for the EU's northern waters similar to that already in place in parts of the Mediterranean?
I bekræftende fald, hvor længe har det eksisteret?
If so, since when?
Hvis ikke, er der da planer om et sådant system?
If not, are there any plans for such a system?
Hvis der er planer om et sådant system, hvilke udgifter forventer Kommissionen da til installation og vedligeholdelse, og hvem vil afholde dem?
If such a system is planned, what are the Commission's estimates for the costs of installing and maintaining it and who will pay?
Hvor stor er risikoen ifølge Kommissionen for, at en tsunami rammer den europæiske nordkyst og de nordeuropæiske øer?
In the Commission's view, how high a risk is there that a tsunami could hit the EU's north coast and the northern European islands?
Råder Kommissionen over informationer om, hvorvidt de eksisterende dæmninger vil være stærke nok til at holde stand mod en tsunami?
Does the Commission have any information on whether existing dams would be strong enough to withstand a tsunami?
Hvilke områder råder ikke over dæmninger, men ville ifølge Kommissionen kunne blive ramt af en tsunami?
What areas do not have any dams but could, in the Commission's view, be hit by a tsunami?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012359/2011
Question for written answer E-012359/2011
Om: Tsunamivarslingssystem i Middelhavsområdet
Subject: Tsunami early warning system in the Mediterranean basin
I sit svar på forespørgsel P‑1578/2010 om et tsunamivarslingssystem udtalte Kommissionen den 10. marts 2010 følgende:
In its answer of 10 March 2010 to Question P‑1578/2010 on a tsunami early warning system, the Commission stated the following:
»As regards the required sea level network, the Commission has funded a project on Tsunami Risk and Strategies for the European Region (TRANSFER), which has concluded that in the existing network only 20‑25 gauges are available and are not sufficient for a proper coverage of the Mediterranean.
‘As regards the required sea level network, the Commission has funded a project on Tsunami Risk and Strategies for the European Region (TRANSFER), which has concluded that in the existing network only 20-25 gauges are available and are not sufficient for a proper coverage of the Mediterranean.
The NEAMTWS and European and North African networks have gaps along North African, European Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts.
The NEAMTWS and European and North African networks have gaps along North African, European Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts.
No deep-sea sensor is present in the Mediterranean.«
No deep-sea sensor is present in the Mediterranean.’
Har denne situation ændret sig siden marts 2010?
Has there been any change in the situation since March 2010?
Hvor mange trykmålere (»gauges«) er der ifølge Kommissionen behov for for at dække hele Middelhavsområdet?
How many gauges does the Commission consider necessary for full coverage of the Mediterranean?
Hvis der findes flere trykmålere, hvem har da finansieret og organiseret købet og installationen af disse?
If additional gauges are now in place, who financed and organised the purchase and installation of these gauges?
Findes der nu en dybhavssensor i Middelhavet?
Is there now a deep-sea sensor in the Mediterranean?
Hvis ja, hvem har da organiseret købet og installationen?
If so, who financed and organised its purchase and installation?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012360/2011
Question for written answer E-012360/2011
Om: Forsuring af havvand
Subject: Ocean acidification
Målinger har vist, at pH-værdien i havvand i løbet af de seneste år er faldet fra 8,2 til 8,1.
According to measurements, ocean pH has fallen from 8.2 to 8.1 in recent years.
I artikler offentliggjort i tidsskrifterne »Nature« og »Science« argumenteres der for, at det skyldes det øgede CO 2‑ indhold i atmosfæren og de globalt stigende temperaturer, og at pH-værdien inden 2020 kan falde til 7,8.
The ‘Nature’ and ‘Science’ journals attribute this to increased CO 2 levels in the atmosphere coupled with rising global temperatures and indicate that the pH level could fall to 7.8 % by 2020.
Råder Kommissionen over tal for ændringen af pH-værdien og for den aktuelle pH-værdi i EU's territorialfarvande, opdelt efter medlemsland?
Does the Commission have statistics regarding pH changes and current pH levels in EU territorial waters broken down by Member State?
Hvordan vurderer Kommissionen forsuringen med hensyn til dens økologiske, økonomiske og mulige sociale virkninger i EU?
What view does the Commission take of ocean acidification, given the ecological, economic and possible social impact thereof within the EU?
Hvilke konkrete foranstaltninger planlægger Kommissionen for at modvirke denne proces?
What specific countermeasures is it envisaging?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012361/2011
Question for written answer E-012361/2011
Om: Venturekapitalkapitalfondes størrelse
Subject: Size of venture capital funds
I pressemeddelelsen IP/11/1513 af 7. december 2011 erklærer Kommissionen:
In press release IP/11/1513, issued on 7 December 2011, the Commission pointed out that
»Europæiske venturekapitalfonde […] har normalt langt fra den optimale størrelse, som er en forudsætning for, at en diversificeret investeringsstrategi kan yde et relevant kapitalbidrag til individuelle virksomheder og derved få en reel virkning. […] I henhold til økonomiske undersøgelser kan venturekapitalfonde betyde en reel forskel for de virksomheder, som de investerer i, når de når op på en størrelse svarende til ca. 280 mio. EUR.«
‘the average European venture capital fund is small and far beneath the optimal size necessary for a diversified investment strategy to make a meaningful capital contribution to individual companies and thereby produce real impact. … Economic studies show that venture capital funds can make a real difference for the industries they invest in once their size reaches approximately EUR 280 million’.
Der er stor forskel på den økonomiske situation i EU's medlemsstater og på størrelsen og antallet af venturekapitalfonde i EU.
There is, however, a wide range of variation within the EU both in terms of the economic situation in individual Member States and in terms of the size and number of venture capital funds.
Råder Kommissionen over egne eller fremmede undersøgelser, som viser lignende resultater i andre EU‑medlemsstater?
Does the Commission have any studies of its own or other external studies containing similar findings as far as other Member States are concerned?
Er den optimale størrelse af en venturekapitalfond efter Kommissionens mening uafhængig af den lokale valuta, lønninger, eksisterende infrastruktur, lokale muligheder for anden finansiering og/eller den generelle økonomiske situation i et land?
Does the optimal size of a venture capital fund depend, in the Commission’s opinion, on the local currency, wages, the existing infrastructure, the means available locally for raising capital from elsewhere, and/or the overall economic situation in the country in question?
Mener Kommissionen, at fælles regler for venturekapitalfonde vil komme SMV'er i alle medlemsstater til gode i samme grad, eller bliver SMV'er eller venturekapitalfonde i nogle medlemsstater stillet ringere, når man fokuserer på en »optimal størrelse« af sådanne fonde?
Does the Commission believe that SMEs in all Member States would benefit equally if venture capital funds were subject to uniform regulation, or would it be the case that SMEs and funds in some Member States might be placed at a disadvantage if attempts were made to achieve an ‘optimal’ fund size?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012362/2011
Question for written answer E-012362/2011
Om: Kommissionens dokumentation vedrørende SMV'ers succes takket være venturekapital
Subject: Commission evidence of the success of SMEs using venture capital
I Kommissionens pressemeddelelse IP/11/1513 af 7. december 2011 hedder det:
In its press release IP/11/1513 of 7 December 2011, the Commission states that:
»I henhold til den dokumentation, som Kommissionen har undersøgt, har virksomheder med langsigtede venturekapitalinvestorer større succes end virksomheder, som er afhængige af kortfristet finansiering fra bankerne.«
‘Evidence examined by the Commission shows that a company with long-term venture capital investors is more successful than a company that needs to rely on short-term finance from banks.’
Hvilken dokumentation har Kommissionen undersøgt, hvoraf det fremgår?
What evidence does the Commission have to back up this claim?
Hvilke kriterier er der anvendt for at vurdere en virksomheds »succes«?
What criteria were used to assess the ‘success’ of a company?
Hvilke lande kommer disse oplysninger fra eller de oplysninger, som ligger til grund for den dokumentation, som Kommissionen har undersøgt?
Which countries provided these data or the data contained in the evidence examined by the Commission?
Hvem har indsamlet disse data og analyseret dem, og hvordan er undersøgelsen og analysen finansieret?
Who collected/analysed these data and how was the data collection/analysis financed?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012363/2011
Question for written answer E-012363/2011
Om: Succes for SMV'er takket være venturekapitalinvestorers screeninger
Subject: SME success: role of screening by venture capital investors
I pressemeddelelsen IP/11/1513 af 7. december 2011 erklærer Kommissionen:
In press release IP/11/1513, issued on 7 December 2011, the Commission states that:
»Virksomheder med langsigtede venturekapitalinvestorer har større succes end virksomheder, som er afhængige af kortfristet finansiering fra bankerne.
‘a company with long-term venture capital investors is more successful than a company that needs to rely on short-term finance from banks.
Det tilskrives normalt den grundige screening, som venturekapitalfonde foretager, før de investerer i en virksomhed.«
This is commonly attributed to the rigorous screening that a venture capital fund undertakes prior to investing in a company’.
Råder Kommissionen over undersøgelser, dokumentation eller en begrundet vurdering af, hvorfor venturekapitalinvestorernes screening tilsyneladende gør små og mellemstore virksomheder (SMV'er) mere succesfulde?
Does the Commission have studies, documents, or a substantiated assessment showing why screening by venture capital investors apparently makes small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) more successful?
Er det muligt, at det ikke er selve screeningen, der gør SMV'er mere succesfulde, men at venturekapitalinvestorer kun investerer i SMV'er, hvor chancerne for succes i forvejen er store?
Is it possible that it is not screening as such which makes SMEs more successful, but the fact that venture capitalists invest only in SMEs whose prospects of success are good in any case?
Hvis ja, er det muligt, at disse virksomheder også ville være lige så succesfulde med andre finansieringsmuligheder?
If the answer is yes, does that mean that the companies concerned would have been just as successful had they availed themselves of other financing opportunities?
Hvis ja, er det muligt, at venturekapitalinvestorer ikke bidrager til SMV'ers succes?
If that is so, could the implication be that the contribution of venture capital funds has no bearing on the success of SMEs?
Hvis Kommissionen mener, at venturekapitalinvestorer bidrager til en virksomheds succes:
If the Commission is of the opinion that venture capital investors do contribute to a company’s success,
Er der da muligheder for at give SMV'er, som ikke kan finde venturekapitalinvestorer, adgang til de fordele, som støtte fra en venturekapitalinvestor normalt indebærer, ved hjælp af andre foranstaltninger (f.eks. efteruddannelse af stifterne, fordelagtige lån fra staten eller EU etc.)?
Are there ways of ensuring (e.g. through further training for company founders, soft state or EU loans, etc.) that SMEs which failed to attract venture capitalist investors could benefit from the advantages normally afforded by support from a venture capital fund?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012364/2011
Question for written answer E-012364/2011
Om: Certificering af fair produktion — »Fair Production«-mærkning
Subject: Fair production certification: a ‘Fair Production’ label
I Europa er Fairtrade Mærket en velkendt og anerkendt mærkning for fair handlede varer.
The ‘Fair Trade’ label is a well-known and widely recognised logo in Europe for fairly traded products.
Det giver forbrugeren mulighed for målrettet at vælge manufaktur- og landbrugsvarer, hvor producenten får en rimelig mindstepris for sit produkt.
It allows consumers to select manufactured and agricultural products for which producers receive a decent minimum price for their product.
Medier og NGO'er beretter gang på gang om udbytning af arbejdere i fabrikker, navnlig i Asien.
Time and again there are reports in the media and from NGOs regarding the exploitation of workers in factories, particularly in Asia.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-012365/2011
Question for written answer E-012365/2011
Om: Data om hvidvaskning af penge
Subject: Money laundering data
Kriminelle grupper benytter hvidvaskning af penge for at kunne bruge penge opnået ved kriminelle aktiviteter til finansielle transaktioner.
Criminal groups have money gained through criminal activity ‘laundered’ to be able to use it in financial transactions.