natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Version 2 går ud på, at denne påståede kollega fra »Stern« ikke kunne have været historiens kilde, det måtte være en anonym tredjeperson.
Version 2 is that this alleged ‘Stern’ colleague of his could not have been the source for the story, it had to be an unnamed third person.
I virkeligheden var det en helt anden person, hvis navn han ikke ville afsløre, men som var en »kollega« og en »talsmand«.
In fact, it was some other person whose name he did not want to reveal but who was a ‘colleague’ and a ‘spokesman’.
Han fortalte dommerne, at han ikke var i stand til at »erindre«, at denne »Stern«-kollega havde fortalt ham, at hr. Tillack havde betalt tjenestemændene.
He told the judges that he was not able to ‘recall’ that this ‘Stern’ colleague told him that Mr Tillack had paid officials.
Dommerne spurgte ham så, hvem der havde fortalt ham historien.
The judges then asked him who had told him this story.
Senere under samme retsmøde hævdede hans advokat, hr. Uphoff, som var betalt af Kommissionen, og som tillige repræsenterer hr. Brüner, at hr. Gross også havde hørt fra sin »Stern«-kollega om hr. Tillacks betalinger til tjenestemændene.
Later in the same hearing, his lawyer, Mr Uphoff, who was paid by the Commission and who also represents Mr Brüner, maintained that Mr Gross had also heard from his ‘Stern’ colleague about Mr Tillack’s payments to officials.
Derpå bekræftede hr. Gross også denne version.
Then Mr Gross confirmed this version, too.
I følge et notat af hr. Ilett fra OLAF, dateret 22. marts 2002, som er skrevet den 21. marts 2002, var også han, foruden hr. Kinnock, hr. Manservisi og hr. Faull, blevet informeret om hr. Gross' beskyldninger mod hr. Tillack den 21. marts 2002, formodentlig endda tidligere.
According to a note by Mr Ilett of OLAF dated 22 March 2002, which was written on 21 March 2002, he as well as Mr Kinnock, Mr Manservisi and Mr Faull had been informed about Mr Gross’ allegations against Mr Tillack on 21 March 2002, presumably even earlier.
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at hr. Gross' virkelige kilde var en af hans kolleger i Kommissionen?
Can the Commission confirm that Mr Gross’ true source was a colleague of his in the Commission?
I bekræftende fald, hvem?
If so, who?
Har Kommissionen, eller har OLAF, øvet indflydelse på det vidneudsagn hr. Gross har afgivet?
Has the Commission, or has OLAF, influenced the testimony made by Mr Gross?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om hr. Gross blev tilskyndet af én af disse eller af nogen anden i Kommissionen til ikke at fortælle sandheden om navnet på sin kilde eller om andre forhold?
Can the Commission indicate whether Mr Gross was encouraged by any of these or by any other persons in the Commission to fail to tell the truth about the name of his source or on any other matter?
Gav hr. Faull, i sin egenskab af hr. Gross' overordnede, denne nogen form for ordre herom ?
Did Mr Faull, in his capacity as Mr Gross’ superior, give any orders in that respect to Mr Gross?
Gav fru Schreyer, kommissæren under hvem hr. Gross arbejdede, ordre til noget i denne retning?
Did Mrs Schreyer, the Commissioner under whom Mr Gross worked, give any orders in that respect?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1055/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1055/05
Om: OLAF's tvivlsomme pålidelighed i Tillack-sagen
Subject: Questionable trustworthiness of OLAF in the Tillack case
Den 14. marts 2002 direktøren for OLAF, hr. Brüner, et brev til udgiverne af »Stern«, hvori han hævdede, at artiklen fra den 7. marts 2002 var ukorrekt, da der ikke havde været beskyldninger mod hr. Faull.
On 14 March 2002 OLAF Director Mr Brüner wrote a letter to the editors of ‘Stern’ in which he claimed that the article of 7 March 2002 was incorrect as no allegations had been made against Mr Faull.
Hvorfor hvidvaskede Kommissionen og hr. Brüner offentligt hr. Faull, uanset i hvert fald hr. Brüner vidste, at han ikke talte sandt?
Why did the Commission and Mr Brüner publicly whitewash Mr Faull, although at least Mr Brüner knew that he was not telling the truth?
Er det også Kommissionens opfattelse, at hr. Brüner i denne sag har vist, at han ikke handlede uafhængigt, som loven kræver?
Does the Commission share the opinion that Mr Brüner has shown in this case that he did not act independently, as required by the law?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1056/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1056/05
Om: Kommissionens rolle i Tillack-sagen
Subject: The role of the Commission in the Tillack case
På en pressekonference den 23. marts 2002 angående politiaktionerne og OLAF's klager mod den tyske journalist Hans-Martin Tillack hævdede Kommissionens talsmand, Reijo Kemppinen, at Kommissionen ikke havde nogen rolle at spille i sagen.
In a press conference held on 23 March 2002 concerning the police actions and OLAF complaints against the German journalist Hans-Martin Tillack the Commission spokesman Reijo Kemppinen claimed that the Commission had ‘no role to play’ in this case.
Det fremgår af nogle dokumenter, der nu er dukket op, at dette var usandt, og at Kommissionen spillede en vigtig rolle i sagen.
According to documents which have now been revealed, this was untrue, and the Commission played an important role in this affair.
Ifølge et notat fra Ilett fra OLAF dateret den 22. marts 2002 og skrevet den 21. marts 2002 havde Ilett og flere tjenestemænd ved Kommissionen (Kinnock, Manservisi fra Prodis kabinet og Faull) den 21. marts 2002 - og formodentlig også tidligere - kendskab til de beskyldninger, som en daværende talsmand for Kommissionen, Gross, rettede mod Tillack.
According to a note by Mr Ilett of OLAF dated 22 March 2002 and written on 21 March 2002, he and several Commission officials (Mr Kinnock, Mr Manservisi, of the Prodi Cabinet, and Mr Faull) knew on 21 March 2002, and presumably earlier, about the allegations made by a then Commission spokesman, Mr Gross, against Mr Tillack.
Ifølge notatet fra Ilett fortalte tjenestemand ved Kommissionen Linsey McCallum fra Kinnocks kabinet Ilett, at der var en holdning om, at man skulle anmode de belgiske myndigheder om straks at indlede en strafferetlig undersøgelse og eventuelt tilbagekalde Tillacks akkreditering til Kommissionen, indtil undersøgelsen var afsluttet.
According to the said Ilett note, the Commission official, Linsey McCallum, of the Kinnock Cabinet, told Mr Ilett that there was ‘one school of thought’ to ask the Belgian authorities to ‘open a criminal investigation immediately and possibly to revoke Mr Tillack's accreditation to the Commission pending this investigation’.
Ilett bemærkede endvidere, at han sammen med sine kollegaer fra OLAF havde formået at overbevise McCallum, Faull, Kinnock og Manservisi om, at der ikke var et tilstrækkeligt faktuelt grundlag for en sådan sag.
Mr Ilett then noted that he and his OLAF colleagues managed to convince Mrs McCallum, Mr Faull, Mr Kinnock and Mr Manservisi, that the factual basis for such an action was too weak.
Ikke desto mindre anførte han, at Kommissionen - herunder OLAF - formentlig ville ønske at statuere et eksempel med journalisten, hvis de fornødne beviser kunne fremskaffes.
Nevertheless, he noted that ‘the Commission - OLAF included - will presumably want to make an example of the journalist if the evidence can be found’.
Det følger heraf, at ideen om en strafferetlig undersøgelse ikke opstod i OLAF, men i Kommissionen, muligvis under en diskussion mellem Kinnock, Faull og Manservisi.
It follows that the idea of criminal investigation did not originate inside OLAF but in the Commission, possibly in a discussion between Mr Kinnock, Mr Faull and Mr Manservisi.
Hvem var det præcist i Kommissionen, der havde givet udtryk for den holdning, som McCallum talte om?
Who precisely in the Commission had developed the ‘school of thought’ referred to by Mrs McCallum?
Deltog Kommissionen også senere i OLAF's planer om en strafferetlig undersøgelse mod Tillack, som derefter blev mere konkrete, selv om der stadig ikke var nogen beviser mod ham?
Had the Commission at later stages also participated in OLAF plans for a criminal investigation against Mr Tillack, which then became more specific, although there was still no evidence against him?
I bekræftende fald: Hvornår fandt disse kontakter sted, og hvem deltog fra Kommissionens side?
If so, when and by whom in the Commission?
Hvorfor fortalte Kemppinen ikke sandheden om Kommissionens rolle den 23. marts 2002?
Why did Mr Kemppinen fail to tell the truth about the Commission's role on 23 March 2002?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1057/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1057/05
Om: Cuba - Polens nationaldag
Subject: Cuba - Polish National Day
Rådet har for nylig revideret sin politik i forbindelse med Cuba, idet det har besluttet at ophæve de foranstaltninger, der blev fastlagt den 5. juni 2003, som følge af tilbageholdelsen og fængslingen af 75 dissidenter og summarisk henrettelse af tre borgere.
The Council has recently reviewed its policy on Cuba, deciding to suspend the measures defined on 5 June 2003 in the wake of the arrest and imprisonment of 75 dissidents and the summary execution of three citizens.
Dette vil beklageligvis kunne medføre, at man holder op med at indbyde de cubanske demokrater til receptioner i anledning af nationale eller lignende festdage på de europæiske ambassader i Cuba.
This could have the unfortunate effect of suspending the practice of inviting Cuban democrats to the events held on national days or similar occasions by the EU embassies in Cuba.
Spørgsmålet er fortsat uafklaret, eftersom det ifølge de officielle udlægninger er op til regeringerne at afgøre dette spørgsmål, selvom Kommissionen også har noget at skulle have sagt.
The issue remains unclear as, according to the interpretations made public, this specific point is left to each government to decide freely, although the Commission also has its role to play.
Oswaldo Payá Sardinas, vinder af Sakharov-prisen 2002, er en person, som Den Europæiske Union har påtaget sig et særligt ansvar for.
Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas, who was awarded the Sakharov Prize in 2002, is a figure for whom the EU has contracted a particular responsibility.
Det kan dog være, at han nu må affinde sig med ikke længere at figurere på listen over indbudte og blive offer for det triste fænomen, som præsident Vaclav Havel i en nylig artikel om emnet kaldte den »diplomatiske apartheid«.
However, he may now find himself excluded from the guest lists and end up a victim of what President Vaclav Havel, in a recent article on the subject, called an unfortunate form of ‘diplomatic apartheid’.
Ved Rådet, hvilket standpunkt den polske regering konkret indtager med hensyn til indbydelser til den nederlandske ambassade af cubanske demokrater og dissidenter i den nærmeste fremtid?
Can the Council provide information on the concrete position of the Polish government regarding the issuing of invitations in the near future to Cuban democrats and dissidents to the Polish embassy in Havana?
Kan Rådet oplyse, om det har truffet eller agter at træffe foranstaltninger for at sikre, at Oswaldo Payá Sardinas, Sakharov-pris-vinder fra 2002, vil blive indbudt den 3. maj til receptionen i anledning af den polske nationaldag, der vil blive afholdt på den polske ambassade i Havana?
Can the Council state in particular whether it has taken or intends to take measures to ensure that Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas, the 2002 Sakharov Prize laureate, will be invited on 3 May to the reception in commemoration of the Polish national day which will be held at the Polish embassy in Havana?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1058/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1058/05
Om: Cuba - Nederlandenes nationaldag
Subject: Cuba - Netherlands National Day
Ved Rådet, hvilket standpunkt den nederlandske regering konkret indtager med hensyn til indbydelser til den nederlandske ambassade af cubanske demokrater og dissidenter i den nærmeste fremtid?
Can the Council provide information on the concrete position of the Netherlands government regarding the issuing of invitations in the near future to Cuban democrats and dissidents to the Netherlands embassy in Havana?
Kan Rådet oplyse, om det har truffet eller agter at træffe foranstaltninger for at sikre, at Oswaldo Payá Sardinas, Sakharov-pris-vinder fra 2002, vil blive indbudt den 30. april til receptionen i anledning af den nederlandske nationaldag, der vil blive afholdt på den nederlandske ambassade i Havana?
Can the Council state in particular whether it has taken or intends to take measures to ensure that Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas, the 2002 Sakharov Prize laureate, will be invited on 30 April to the reception in commemoration of the Netherlands national day which will be held at the Netherlands embassy in Havana?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1061/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1061/05
Om: Ændring af direktiv 94/45/EF
Subject: Revision of Directive 94/45/EC
På et tidspunkt, hvor kandidatlandenes tiltrædelse af EU har nået sit højdepunkt, er vi vidne til en lang række virksomhedsfusioner og -salg samt udflytninger af virksomheder etableret i medlemsstaterne til visse østeuropæiske lande og andre kontinenter, ikke alene på grund af de lave lønninger, men også på grund af de betydelige skattemæssige fordele og den mangel på fundamentale arbejdsretlige bestemmelser, der er kendetegnende for disse lande.
At a time when the EU has completed enlargement there still continue to be company mergers, take-overs and relocations to certain eastern European countries and other continents, not only because of low wage costs, but also because of considerable tax benefits and the lack of basic labour rights that some countries offer businesses.
Disse fusioner, salg og udflytninger vil kunne føre til en stigning i arbejdsløsheden i EU-landene samt til en undergravning af borgernes støtte til målet om at skabe et større og bedre Europa på grund af den mangel på orientering og gennemskuelighed samt høring af arbejdstagerne, der præger hele informationsprocessen.
These mergers, take-overs and relocations may cause a rise in unemployment levels in the EU countries and the risk of undermining grass-roots support for the aim of creating a bigger and better Europe, in view of the lack of information and transparency of the process of informing and consulting workers.
Påtænker Kommissionen at tage skridt til at afhjælpe de eventuelle følger af udflytningen af virksomheder fra de nuværende medlemsstater til Østeuropa eller andre kontinenter som led i det prioriterede europæiske mål for beskæftigelsen, som Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne fastsatte i Lissabon-strategien?
Has the Commission envisaged any measure to alleviate the possible impact of the relocation of businesses from the current Member States to eastern Europe or other continents, in the context of employment as a European priority objective, which the Commission and the Member States set themselves in the Lisbon Strategy?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1062/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1062/05
Om: Konsekvenserne ved den tyrkiske politivold
Subject: Repercussions of Turkish police brutality
Søndag den 6. marts 2005 demonstrerede nogle tyrkiske kvinder for at kaste lys over kvindernes rettigheder i Tyrkiet.
On Sunday, 6 March 2005, a number Turkish women held a demonstration to highlight women's rights in Turkey.
Demonstrationen blev nedkæmpet af det tyrkiske politi.
The demonstration was suppressed by the Turkish police.
Det fremgår af tv-optagelser fra demonstrationen, at politiet bankede løs på demonstranterne med knipler og sprøjtede tåregas direkte ind i øjnene på de sagesløse demonstranter.
Television pictures of the demonstration show that the police assaulted innocent demonstrators with truncheons and sprayed tear gas straight into their eyes.
EU’s kommissær for udvidelse, Olli Rehn, var tilfældigvis på besøg i Tyrkiet på det pågældende tidspunkt for at vurdere Tyrkiets reformvilje med henblik på at kunne leve op til EU's krav for at opnå medlemskab.
The EU Commissioner for enlargement, Olli Rehn, happened to be on a visit to Turkey at the time in question to assess Turkey's willingness to reform in order to meet the EU's criteria for membership.
Efter at have set billederne af politiets fremfærd udtalte Olli Rehn: »Vi er chokerede over billederne af politi, der slår kvinder, som demonstrerede i Istanbul i forbindelse med den internationale kvindedag«.
After having seen the pictures of the police's conduct, Olli Rehn said ‘We are shocked at the pictures of police hitting women who were demonstrating in Istanbul in connection with International Women's Day’.
Samlet svar afgivet på Kommissionens vegne af Olli Rehn
Joint answer given by Mr Rehn on behalf of the Commission
Skriftlige forespørgsler : E-1062/05 , E-1063/05
Written questions : E-1062/05 , E-1063/05
(29. april 2005)
(29 April 2005)
Kommissionen nærer også betænkeligheder ved kvindernes situation i Tyrkiet, således som det er kommet til udtryk i dens periodiske rapport for 2004 om Tyrkiets fremskridt mod tiltrædelse.
The Commission shares concerns with regard to the situation of women in Turkey, as assessed in its 2004 regular report on Turkey’s progress towards accession.
Hvad angår politiets voldelige fremfærd i Istanbul på den internationale kvindedag den 6. marts 2005, skal disse begivenheder også ses på den bredere baggrund, som lovgivningen om forsamlingsfrihed udgør, navnlig loven om møder og demonstrationer, og på baggrund af sikkerhedsstyrkernes helt urimelige magtanvendelse.
Regarding the violence by police at the International Women’s Day Protest in Istanbul on 6 March 2005, these events should also be viewed in the broader context of legislation governing freedom of association, in particular the law on meetings and demonstrations, and with regard to the disproportionate use of force by security forces.
Kommissionen reagerede omgående med en fordømmelse af politiets opførsel og et krav om indgriben fra de tyrkiske myndigheders side.
The Commission reacted swiftly to condemn the behaviour of the police and to demand action from the Turkish authorities.
Til dato er seks politiofficerer suspenderet, indtil en undersøgelse af deres fremfærd er afsluttet.
To date, six police officers have been suspended pending an investigation into their actions.
Kommissionen vil løbende overvåge udviklingen i kvindernes rettigheder i Tyrkiet på grundlag af de politiske Københavnskriterier og tiltrædelsespartnerskabet.
The Commission will continue to monitor closely progress of women’s rights in Turkey on the basis of the Copenhagen political criteria and the accession partnership.
Hvad angår den mulige indflydelse på tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne, vil indledningen af forhandlingerne blive baseret på Det Europæiske Råds konklusioner fra mødet den 17. december 2004, hvor Tyrkiets afgørende fremskridt med den vidtrækkende reformproces blev hilst velkommen.
With regard to possible impact on accession negotiations, preparations for the start of negotiations will be based on the European Council conclusions of 17 December 2004, which welcomed the decisive progress made by Turkey in its far reaching reform process.
Det blev også i disse konklusioner anført, at Kommissionen i tilfælde af en grov og vedholdende overtrædelse af principperne om frihed, demokrati, respekt for menneskerettighederne samt de grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder og retsstatsprincippet på eget initiativ eller på anmodning af en tredjedel af medlemsstaterne kan henstille, at forhandlingerne suspenderes, og foreslå betingelser for deres genoptagelse.
These conclusions also indicated that, in the case of a serious or persistent breach of the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the rule of law, the Commission could, on its own initiative or on the request of one third of the Member States, recommend the suspension of negotiations and propose the conditions for eventual resumption.
Kommissionen støtter adskillige projekter, som tager sigte på at forbedre kvindernes situation i Tyrkiet, og som omfatter spørgsmål såsom vold i hjemmet, nødvendigheden af kommunale boliger for voldsramte kvinder og rådgivningscentre, bevidstgørelse af den offentlige administration og medierne, kvinders deltagelse i arbejdsstyrken og forbedring af kvinders læse- og skrivefærdighed.
The Commission is supporting several projects aimed at improving the situation of women in Turkey, addressing such issues as domestic violence, the need for municipal shelters and counselling centres, awareness-raising within the public administration and the media, women’s participation in the labour force, and improving literacy levels amongst women.
Kommissionen har også opfordret Tyrkiet til at deltage i DAPHNE-programmet, som støtter organisationer, der bekæmper vold mod børn, unge og kvinder.
The Commission has also invited Turkey to participate in the Daphne programme, which supports organisations combating violence against children, young people and women.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1063/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1063/05
Om: Kvinders rettigheder i Tyrkiet
Subject: Women's rights in Turkey
I et telegram fra det danske nyhedsbureau »Ritzau« den 9. december 2004 beskrives en række sager om vold mod kvinder og kvindeundertrykkelse i Tyrkiet.
A telegram of 9 December 2004 from the Danish news agency ‘Ritzau’ describes a number of cases of violence against women and the oppression of women in Turkey.
Tyrkiske kvinder udsættes ofte for grov vold fra nære familiemedlemmers side, typisk for noget så banalt som at have båret en stramtsiddende kjole!
Turkish women are often subjected to brutal violence by close members of their family, typically for something as banal as having worn a tight-fitting skirt!
Den omfattende vold resulterer i nogle tilfælde i, at kvinderne begår selvmord.
The widespread violence results, in some cases, in the women committing suicide.
I telegrammet oplyses, at mellem en tredjedel og halvdelen af alle tyrkiske kvinder har været udsat for vold begået af medlemmer af deres egne familier.
The telegram reports that between a third and a half of all Turkish women have been subjected to violence perpetrated by members of their own families.
Forud for kvindernes internationale kampdag den 8. marts demonstrerede nogle kvinder i Istanbul for at henlede opmærksomheden på kvinders trænge kår i Tyrkiet.
Ahead of International Women’s Day on 8 March, a number of women demonstrated in Istanbul to draw attention to the dire situation of women in Turkey.
Kvindeundertrykkelse er meget udbredt i Tyrkiet.
Oppression of women is very widespread in Turkey.
Undersøgelser har vist, at op mod halvdelen af tyrkiske kvinder har været udsat for vold fra et familiemedlems side.
Surveys have shown that almost 50% of Turkish women have been subjected to violence from a member of their family.
Beskæftigelsesfrekvensen for kvinder i Tyrkiet var i 2002 på 25,4 %, mens den i EU-25 var på 54,7 % og i Danmark på 71,7 % (kilde: Eurostat).
The rate of employment for women in Turkey in 2002 was 25.4%, whereas in the EU-25 it was 54.7% and in Denmark 71.7% (source: Eurostat).
Kvindeundertrykkelsen og den omfattende vold mod kvinder i Tyrkiet er i vidt omfang kulturelt betinget.
The oppression of women and the widespread violence against women in Turkey is in large measure culturally determined.
Derfor er det lidet sandsynligt, at vilkårene for de tyrkiske kvinder bliver forbedret, selvom det tyrkiske parlament vedtager nok så mange love for at beskytte kvinderne.
It is therefore highly improbable that conditions for Turkish women will improve, however many laws the Turkish parliament passes to protect women.
Ægtemænd vil fortsat banke deres koner, fordi de går i »forkert« tøj.
Husbands will continue to beat their wives for wearing the ‘wrong’ clothes.
Kvinder vil fortsat have store vanskeligheder ved at komme ind på arbejdsmarkedet på grund af den omfattende kønsdiskrimination.
Women will continue to have great difficulty getting into the labour market because of the widespread discrimination.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om den mener, at Tyrkiet har gjort nok med hensyn til kønnenes ligestilling til, at den finder det ansvarligt at indlede optagelsesforhandlinger med Tyrkiet den 3. oktober 2005.
Will the Commission say whether it believes Turkey has done enough in regard to women’s equality to find it responsible to initiate accession negotiations with Turkey on 3 October 2005?