natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvad er den nuværende status for Kommissionens forslag om at forbyde eller begrænse anvendelsen af stryknin som skadedyrsbekæmpelsesmiddel?
Please advise the current status of Commission proposals to ban or restrict the use of strychnine as a pest control agent.
Er Kommissionen opmærksom, at det er en udbredt opfattelse i industrien, at der ikke er noget alternativ, der bekæmper muldvarpe ligeså effektivt?
Is the Commission aware that in the view of many in the industry, there is no alternative measure that provides comparably effective control of moles?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at en øget forekomst af muldvarpe i landbrugsjord medfører, at muldvarpeskud kommer i hø og ensilage med en heraf følgende øget forekomst af listeria og andre infektioner hos husdyr?
Is the Commission concerned that increased incidence of moles on agricultural land will lead to the inclusion of mole casts in hay and silage, and a consequent increase in listeria and other infections in livestock?
Hvorledes har Kommissionen tænkt sig at imødegå dette problem?
How does the Commission propose to counter that problem?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1268/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1268/06
Kommissionen har på grundlag af Rådets afgørelse meddelt, at den vil opkøbe sukkerkvoter fra de enkelte medlemslande, som de er blevet tildelt.
In the light of the Council decision on the sugar sector the Commission has announced that it will buy back the sugar quotas granted to some Member States.
Vil Kommissionen købe kvoterne fra sukkerfabrikkerne uden at opstille en betingelse om, at midlerne fra salget skal anvendes til fordel for producenterne?
Will the Commission buy the quotas from the sugar factories without laying down the condition that the proceeds from the sales should be used to help growers?
Hvis der ikke opstilles betingelser, hvordan vil Kommissionen argumentere for, at forarbejdningsvirksomhederne kan forvalte landekvoterne?
If no conditions are to be imposed, how can the Commission justify the fact that refining companies are allowed to administer quotas allocated on a ‘per country’ basis?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1271/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1271/06
Om: Forvaltning af indtægterne fra privatiseringer
Subject: Privatisation revenue management
I punkt 10 i Den Internationale Valutafonds rapport »Grækenland: Report on Observance of Standards and Codes — Fiscal Transparency Module, February 2006, IMF Country Report No 06/­49« henviser IMF til forvaltningen af de pengemidler, der kommer ind ved privatisering.
In paragraph 10 of its report entitled ‘Greece: Report on observance of standards and codes — Fiscal transparency module, February 2006, IMF Country Report No 06/49’, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) makes the following observations (in English): ‘privatisation revenues have not been transparently transferred to the budget but have been retained in a special privatisation account and subsequently spent outside the normal budgetary process’.
I den originale tekst på engelsk hedder det bl.a., at: »Privatisation revenues have not been transparently transferred to the budget but have been retained in a special privatisation account and subsequently spent outside the normal budgetary process« .
More specifically the privatisation revenue in question is being transferred to a special DEKA (public moveable asset management) account with the Bank of Greece and is being spent outside the normal budgetary process.
Hvordan vil Kommissionen kommentere IMF's ovenfor anførte bemærkninger?
What view does the Commission take of the IMF’s findings as set out above?
Har Kommissionen rettet henvendelser herom til den græske regering?
Has it made any recommendations to the Greek Government concerning this matter?
Ville Kommissionen på grundlag af en detaljeret tabel kunne give oplysninger om alle relevante data og beløb samt brugen af de midler, der hidrører fra privatiseringer?
Could it provide an analytical table of privatisation revenue utilisation, giving all relevant details and the amounts involved?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1272/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1272/06
Om: Lovgivning for samarbejde mellem den offentlige og den private sektor
Subject: Legislation concerning cooperation between the public and private sectors
I punkt 4 i sin rapport »Greece: Report on Observance of Standards and Codes — Fiscal Transparency Module, februar 2006, IMF Country Report No 06/­49« kommenterer Den Internationale Valutafond den lovgivning om samarbejde mellem den offentlige og den private sektor, som den græske stat har indført med lov nr. 3389 fra 2005.
In paragraph 4 of its report entitled ‘Greece: Report on observance of standards and codes — Fiscal transparency module, February 2006, IMF Country Report No 06/49’ the IMF criticises the provisions of Law 3389 of 2005 concerning cooperation between the public and private sector.
Kommissionen bedes på baggrund af IMF's kommentarer vedrørende indkøb og konkurrence i forbindelse med udførelse af offentlige projekter samt dens udtalelse om, at det offentliges interesser ikke beskyttes i tilstrækkeligt omfang gennem disse »særlige entrepriseformer« besvare følgende: Hvad mener Kommissionen om punkt 4 i IMF-­rapporten?
In the light of its observations concerning procurement competition in respect of public projects and failure to protect government interests sufficiently, what view does the Commission take of paragraph 4 of the IMF report?
Deler Kommissionen denne bekymring over den manglende klarhed i lovrammen vedrørende offentlige indkøb, som IMF mener ikke bør »undergrave« konkurrencen mellem de forskellige tilbud, når der bydes på offentlige projekter?
Does it share the concerns expressed concerning lack of clarity regarding public procurement legislation which, according to the IMF, should not be allowed to undermine competitive bidding for public projects?
Deler Kommissionen den opfattelse, som der gives udtryk for i den originale tekst på engelsk, hvor det hedder, at »The recently adopted legal framework for Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) does not provide adequate protection yet against unwarranted fiscal risks and costs for government.
Does it agree with the view stated by this English text that: ‘The recently adopted legal framework for public private partnerships (PPPs) does not provide adequate protection yet against unwarranted fiscal risks and costs for government.
A number of PPP infrastructure projects have been initiated in recent years.
A number of PPP infrastructure projects have been initiated in recent years.
The new PPP law is not very explicit about reporting and accounting requirements of line ministries and agencies which supervise PPPs.
The new PPP law is not very explicit about reporting and accounting requirements of line ministries and agencies which supervise PPPs.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1273/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1273/06
Om: Eurostats afgørelse om registrering af udgifter til militær udrustning
Subject: Ruling by Eurostat concerning the classification of arms expenditure
Ifølge Eurostats afgørelse (9. marts 2005), som harmoniserer metoden for opførelse af udgifterne til militær udrustning på de nationale budgetter i forbindelse med ordrer på udrustning, der strækker sig over en årrække, opføres udgifterne som underskud ved leveringen af materiellet (delivery basis) og ikke ved betaling af forskud eller afdrag (cash basis).
Eurostat’s decision of 9 March 2005 harmonising the entry of arms expenditure in national accounts with regard to orders for military equipment being met over a number of years requires entry in the deficit on a delivery basis and not on a cash basis.
Kan Kommissionen forelægge en tabel, der viser, hvordan denne nye måde for opførelse af forsvarsudgifterne på det nationale budget vil få de græske tal for underskud og offentlig gæld til at se ud for årene 1997-­2004?
Can the Commission provide a table showing what difference these new national accounting entry procedures in respect of defence expenditure will make to Greek deficit and public debt figures for the years 1997‑2004?
Hvad vil være virkningerne for tallene for 2005 samt de følgende år?
What will be the effect on the figures for the 2005 and subsequent years?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1274/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1274/06
Om: Sygesikring i Nederlandene
Subject: Health insurance in Holland
Siden den 1. januar har den nederlandske regering krævet, at personer, der arbejder i Nederlandene, skal tegne sygeforsikring hos nederlandske selskaber.
Since 1 January, the Dutch Government has required those working in the Netherlands to buy health insurance from Dutch companies.
Mange EU-­borgere i Nederlandene har allerede tegnet international sygeforsikring hos selskaber baseret andetsteds i Unionen.
Many EU nationals in the Netherlands already have international health insurance with companies based elsewhere in the Union.
Udgør den nederlandske regerings afvisning af at anerkende disse borgeres sygeforsikring et brud på traktatens bestemmelser om fri bevægelighed for tjenesteydelser og, hvad mere er, for personer?
Does the Dutch Government’s refusal to recognise their health insurance constitute a breach of the Treaty provisions relating to the free movement of services and, indeed, of people?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1275/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1275/06
Det er en velkendt trist kendsgerning, at i hundredvis af unge kvinder, undertiden også pigebørn, hvert år vansires med ætsende syre, fordi de menes at have gjort sig skyld i en eller anden krænkelse af fædrene skik og brug.
It is, sadly, a well known fact that every year hundreds of young women, sometimes even young girls, are disfigured with corrosive acids because they have been considered guilty of infringing ancestral customs.
Denne praksis forekommer i Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal og Indien samt i andre lande, hvor uskrevne stammelove bestemmer, hvorledes kvinder skal opføre sig, navnlig i landområder.
This occurs in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, India and other countries in which unwritten tribal laws dictate what women may and may not do, especially in rural areas.
De unge forfærdeligt skæmmede kvinder dømmes også til et liv i fuldstændig afhængighed og isolation.
Young women are brutally disfigured and condemned to total dependence and isolation.
For seks år siden grundlagde en forretningskvinde fra Rom organisationen »Smileagain«, hvis formål er at rekonstruere ikke blot disse unge skæmmede kvinders ansigter, men også deres liv.
Six years ago a Romanian businesswoman founded ‘Smileagain’, an organisation whose aim is to rebuild not just the lives but also the faces of these disfigured girls.
Et netværk af plastikkirurger med tilknytning til et statsligt hospital tager sig ved organisationens mellemkomst af rekonstrueringen af de uskyldige ofres ansigtstræk.
A network of doctors specialised in plastic surgery, working with a state-run hospital, help to reconstruct the features of these innocent victims.
En anden organisation, »Isplad«, som er specialiseret i hudproblemer, påtager sig den videnskabelige del af behandlingen af disse tilfælde og benytter i den forbindelse ikke-kirurgiske behandlingsformer.
Another association, ‘Isplad’, specialising in dermatology, deals with the scientific work relating to such cases, using non-surgical forms of treatment.
I Bangladesh findes der andre organisationer, som forsøger at hjælpe disse ulykkesramte personer.
In Bangladesh, there are also other organisations which provide assistance for these victims.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at denne barbariske praksis må bekæmpes på det ihærdigste?
Does the Commission not consider that vigorous action must be taken against such barbaric practices?
Mener den ikke, at der bør ydes støtte til disse organisationers arbejde via Unionens programmer for humanitær bistand?
Does it not consider that support should be given to these organisations, using funds from EU humanitarian aid programmes?
Er den i stand til at overvåge det her beskrevne fænomen, i det mindste i de lande, med hvilke Unionen har indgået aftaler?
Is it in a position to monitor the above problem, at least in those countries with which the EU has signed agreements?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1276/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1276/06
Om: Sikkerhed på havet
Subject: Maritime safety
Sikkerheden på de europæiske have må være et centralt aspekt i en europæisk politik til beskyttelse af menneskeliv og miljø.
European maritime safety should be central to a European policy to protect human lives and the environment.
Desværre sker det ofte, at skibe, der ikke kan betegnes som andet end flydende vrag, støder på grund eller, hvad værre er, synker, hvorved deres last, som hyppigt består af olieprodukter, slipper ud i havet.
Unfortunately it frequently happens that ships that are merely floating wrecks run aground or, worse, sink, dumping their cargo, which very often consists of oil, into the sea.
Dette er f.eks. tilfældet med det tyrkiske skib Hanife Ana, der for nu en måned siden gik på grund ud for Puglias kyst.
One instance of this was the Turkish vessel Hanife Ana , which ran aground one month ago on the Puglia coast and whose captain and owner will be faced with criminal charges.
om der ud over de normale Lloyd-standarder for skibes sikkerhed findes andre europæiske bestemmelser, hvori der er fastsat minimumssikkerhedskrav for søtransport? 2.
Will the Commission state whether, in addition to the basic Lloyd vessel safety standards, there are also European provisions laying down minimum safety standards for maritime transport?
om ikke den finder det nødvendigt at opfordre regeringerne i de lande, med hvilke der er indledt tiltrædelsesforhandlinger, til at drage omsorg for, at deres handelsflåde består af skibe, der er i stand til at garantere besætningernes og havmiljøets sikkerhed?
Does it not consider it necessary to call on the governments of countries whose accession negotiations have started to ensure that their merchant navy has vessels capable of guaranteeing the safety of their crews and the marine environment?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1277/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1277/06
Om: Cuba — Europæisk initiativ for demokrati og menneskerettigheder
Subject: Cuba — European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights
I årsprogrammet for 2005 under det europæiske initiativ for demokrati og menneskerettigheder er der afsat et beløb på 10,7 mio. EUR i støtte til en kampagne (a 3) til fremme af demokrati.
The European initiative for democracy and human right's annual programme for 2005 provided for supporting a campaign (a 3) to promote democracy, to which EUR 10.7 million were assigned.
Cuba anses for at være støtteberettiget til nationale projekter.
Cuba was deemed eligible for national projects.
Har det europæiske initiativ for demokrati og menneskerettigheder modtaget ansøgninger om støtte til projekter, som skulle gennemføres i Cuba i det forløbne år?
Did the European initiative for democracy and human rights receive any request to support projects to be implemented in Cuba in that year?
Hvilke projekter er der i bekræftende fald tale om?
Which projects?
Er der ydet støtte til nogle af disse projekter? —
Did it fund any? —
Hvorledes vurderer Kommissionen situationen med hensyn til de pågældende projekters formål, resultater og følger, hvad angår fremskridtene på området ytrings- og foreningsfrihed i Cuba? —
What are the Commission's conclusions with regard to the purpose, results and impact of these projects, in terms of progress made in respect of freedom of expression and association in Cuba? —
Har Kommissionen modtaget forslag for 2006? —
Has it received proposals for 2006? —
Agter den at intensivere gennemførelsen af disse programmer i Cuba? —
Does it intend to step up the implementation of these programmes in Cuba? —
Hvorledes bedømmer det europæiske initiativ for demokrati og menneskerettigheder de ændringer i politikken over for Cuba, som Rådet vedtog den 31. januar 2005?
How does the European initiative for democracy and human rights assess the change in policy with regard to Cuba decided on by the Council on 31 January 2005?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1279/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1279/06
Om: Medfinansiering af byggeri af offentlige bygninger i Grækenland
Subject: Co-funding of construction of public buildings in Greece
I forbindelse med kontrolundersøgelser af offentlige projekter, der er medfinansieret af EU under den tredje fællesskabsstøtteramme og med udgangspunkt i bygning eller genopførelse af statsejede bygningsfaciliteter i Grækenland bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende vedrørende den nuværende programmeringsperiode: 1.
With regard to controls being carried out on public works co-funded by the EU under the third CSF, and with reference to the construction or reconstruction of buildings of State services in Greece, will the Commission say, in respect of the current programming period: 1.
Hvornår præcis og med hensyn til bygning af hvilke projekter er der foretaget en sådan kontrol?
When precisely have such controls been carried out and in respect of the construction of which projects?
Hvilke problemer (økonomiske eller tekniske) er der hidtil blevet påvist ved denne kontrol i hvert enkelt tilfælde? 2.
Which problems (financial or technical) have been identified by these controls in each case so far? 2.
Hvilke selskaber (ved navns nævnelse) inden for denne byggesektor er involveret i de enkelte tilfælde? 3.
Which companies (by name) in the specific construction sector are involved in each case? 3.
Hvilke operationelle programmer eller fællesskabsinitiativer vedrørte disse projekter, hvornår blev de godkendt, og hvem var de endelige modtagere, der fik til opgave at bringe dem til udførelse?
Which operational programmes or Community initiatives concerned these projects, when exactly were they entered and who were the final beneficiaries — implementing bodies?
Hvad var Fællesskabets bidrag i begyndelsen, og hvad nåede det op på efter eventuelle korrektioner i forbindelse med de enkelte projekter?
What was the level of Community aid initially and what level did it reach after adjustments per project?
Hvilke af de konkrete byggerier er blevet fjernet fra EFRU og hvornår præcis? 4.
Which of these specific constructions have been re-entered in the ERDF, and when exactly? 4.
Hvilke sanktioner er blevet iværksat over for de involverede selskaber?
Which penalties have been imposed on the companies involved?
Er der truffet korrigerende foranstaltninger for genoprettelse af kvaliteten af projekterne og den økonomiske gennemsigtighed?
Have corrective measures been taken to restore the quality of projects and financial transparency?
Hvis ja, hvad bestod disse foranstaltninger i, hvad angår de medfinansierede projekter for opførelse af statsejede bygninger i Grækenland?
If so, which measures precisely were taken in respect of the co-funded construction of buildings of State services in Greece?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1280/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1280/06
Om: Oversvømmelser ved Evros
Subject: Flooding of the River Evros
Præfekturet Evros i Grækenland er i en nødsituation, fordi vandstanden fortsat er langt over alarmgrænsen, mens store mængder vand fortsat strømmer ned fra Bulgarien (Evros er en grænseoverskridende flod, der udover Grækenland gennemstrømmer Tyrkiet og Bulgarien).
The Prefecture of Evros in Greece is facing an emergency, because the river level remains far above the alert level, and large volumes of water continue to flow down the river from Bulgaria (the River Evros flows through Turkey and Bulgaria in addition to Greece).
Problemet er opstået på grund af isens smeltning og den store forøgelse af vandmængden i området.
The problem is due to melting ice and the large volume of water flowing towards the region.
Fænomenet har konstant gentaget sig i den senere tid, men præfekten har erklæret sig ude af stand til at imødegå situationen.
This scenario has occurred repeatedly recently, and the Prefect of the region has stated his inability to deal with the situation.
Det er værd at bemærke, at præfekturet Evros udgør EU's yderste fastlandsgrænse mod sydøst.
It should be pointed out that the Prefecture of Evros constitutes the European Union's land border to the south‑east.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvad den agter at gøre for at imødegå denne situation, der konstant gentager sig?
Will the Commission say how it intends to tackle this dangerous phenomenon which is constantly recurring?
Har Kommissionen på nogen måde ydet støtte til de græske myndigheder (programmer, initiativer, fællesskabsaktioner m.m.) med henblik på at træffe foranstaltninger til beskyttelse af dette område, og hvis ja, med hvilke beløb?
Has it supplied any funding whatsoever to the Greek authorities (programmes, initiatives, Community action, etc.) so as to enable them to take preventive measures in the area in question and what sums are involved?
Hvis ja, er Kommissionen så tilfreds med udviklingen i de projekter, som de græske myndigheder har indledt?
If so, is it satisfied with the development of the projects undertaken by the Greek authorities?
Vil Kommissionen rette henvendelse til de bulgarske myndigheder for at få dem til effektivt at forvalte de vandmasser, som dette lands dæmninger fastholder, hvilket ville hjælpe på situationen i Evros-området?
Will it intervene with the Bulgarian authorities to prevail upon them to manage the water effectively through Bulgaria's dams, which would relieve the situation in the Evros region?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1281/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1281/06
Om: Annoncering med opfordring til indgivelse af ansøgninger om ansættelse i det offentlige i Grækenland
Subject: Announcement concerning submission of applications for recruitment to the Greek civil service
Ifølge artikler i den græske presse skal hver kandidat, der ansøger om en stilling i det offentlige, betale 20 EUR til staten for hver ansøgning.
According to reports in the Greek press, every candidate applying for a post in the Greek civil service must pay the State EUR 20 for each application.
Det koster 15 EUR at deltage i udvælgelsesproceduren og 5 EUR at indsende ansøgningen med anbefalet brev (som annoncerne forlanger).
The fee for taking part in the competitions is EUR 15 and EUR 5 covers the cost of dispatching the application by registered letter (as set out in the announcements).
Omkostningerne i forbindelse med ansøgning om en stilling udgør dermed en hindring for arbejdsløse kandidater, eftersom stillingsannoncerne er mange og hyppige.
The cost of applying for a post is therefore prohibitive for unemployed candidates and there are frequent announcements of competitions.
Omkostningerne omfatter ikke de store beløb, det koster at fremsende den øvrige dokumentation, der kræves vedlagt ansøgningen (fotokopier, bekræftede eksamensbeviser m.m.)
This cost does not include the considerable sum required to submit other supporting documents which are required for each application (photocopies, certified diplomas, etc.).
Desuden har den græske regering i de senere måneder tilladt de enkelte organisationer at offentliggøre deres egne stillingsannoncer i modsætning til tidligere, hvor der blev offentliggjort en fælles annonce for alle stillinger med samme kvalifikationskrav.
Moreover, in recent months the Greek Government has allowed each body to publish its own announcements for recruitment separately, whereas in the past a single announcement was made for all posts requiring the same qualifications.
Ifølge oplysninger fra Det Øverste Råd for Udvælgelse af Personale (ASEP) indsendes der hvert år over en million ansøgninger.
According to data provided by the Supreme Council for Personnel Selection (ASEP), each year more than one million applications are submitted.
Ifølge de samme presseartikler tjener staten over 20 mio. EUR om året gennem proceduren for ansættelse i det offentlige, og dette beløb forventes at vokse væsentligt, nu efter at regeringen har givet de enkelte institutioner »grønt lys« til at udsende separate annoncer.
According to the same press reports, the amount which the State gains from the civil service recruitment procedure is more than EUR 20 million a year, while that amount is expected to be surpassed substantially now that the government has given the go-ahead for individual bodies to recruit separately.