natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I denne forbindelse er det også vigtigt, at Tyrkiet gør fremskridt med gennemførelsen af de prioriteter, der er fastlagt i det reviderede tiltrædelsespartnerskab, som Rådet vedtog den 23. januar 2006.
In this context, the need for Turkey to progress in the implementation of the priorities laid down in the revised accession partnership adopted by the Council on 23 January 2006 is equally important.
Tyrkiet forventes at udarbejde en plan, herunder en tidsplan og specifikke foranstaltninger til opfyldelse af tiltrædelsespartnerskabets prioriteter.
Turkey is expected to develop a plan including a timetable and specific measures foreseen to address the accession partnership priorities.
En af de kortfristede prioriteter er, at Tyrkiet fortsat skal bringe den civile kontrol af militæret på linje med praksis i EU-medlemsstaterne og tage skridt til at fremme ansvarlighed og gennemsigtighed i varetagelsen af sikkerhedsanliggender.
One such short‑term priority is that Turkey should continue to align civilian control of the military with practice in EU Member States and take steps towards bringing greater accountability and transparency in the conduct of security affaires.
Kommissionen vil fortsat nøje overvåge udviklingen på dette område og regelmæssigt aflægge rapport herom til Rådet.
The Commission will continue to monitor developments closely in this area and to report on them to the Council regularly.
Det ærede medlem kan derfor være forsikret om, at EU fortsat nøje vil overvåge situationen i Tyrkiet.
The Honourable Member may therefore be assured that the Union will continue to carefully monitor the Turkish situation.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4720/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4720/05
Om: EU-tjenestemændenes bosættelse omkring Bruxelles
Subject: EU staff settling on the outskirts of Brussels
Erfaringen viser, at langt størstedelen af de EU-­tjenestemænd, der i dag arbejder i Bruxelles, vælger at bosætte sig i en af de 19 kommuner i hovedstadsregionen Bruxelles eller i området lige udenfor.
Experience shows that the majority of EU officials now working in Brussels choose to live in one of the 19 municipalities of the Brussels capital region or on the outskirts of Brussels.
Navnlig i de sidstnævnte områder, der ligger i den flamske region, hvor der tales nederlandsk, rejser dette en række problemer.
However, particularly in the latter area, which is part of the Flemish and therefore Dutch-speaking region, a number of problems arise.
Den gradvise forfranskning af dele af det flamske Brabrant er et stort politisk problem.
The gradual Frenchification of parts of Flemish Brabant is a significant political problem.
I flere kommuner (de såkaldte kommuner medsproglettelser) er de oprindelige flamske indbyggere blevet et mindretal.
In a number of municipalities (so-called municipalities with facilities) the original Flemish inhabitants have already become a minority.
Tilstedeværelsen af de mange EU-­tjenestemænd, der ikke taler nederlandsk, har ofte øget problemerne.
The presence of large numbers of EU staff who cannot speak Dutch has often exacerbated the problems.
Dette skyldes ikke manglende vilje fra disse tjenestemænds side, men andre årsager, som f.eks. manglende information.
Not because of any ill will on the part of these EU officials, but mostly for other reasons such as lack of information.
Der er dog muligheder for at løse disse problemer.
There are ways of tackling these problems.
Nye (og også nuværende) tjenestemænd kan tilbydes incitamenter til at bosætte sig i det tilgrænsende vallonske Brabrant.
New or even existing EU officials could be offered incentives to settle in neighbouring Walloon Brabant.
De kan også blive gjort opmærksom på den politiske situation omkring Bruxelles og blive tilskyndet til at deltage i kommunalt organiserede nederlandskkurser.
They could also be made aware of the political situation in the outskirts of Brussels, and encouraged to take the Dutch language courses organised by the municipalities, and so on.
Er Kommissionen, i modsætning til tidligere kommissionsmedlem Neil Kinnock, rede til at undersøge denne og andre mulige foranstaltninger med henblik på at sikre, at EU-­tjenestemændenes bosættelse og ophold i og omkring Bruxelles kan forløbe mere gnidningsløst?
Is the Commission, unlike former Commissioner Neil Kinnock, prepared to examine these and possibly other measures to make the process of EU staff taking up residence and settling in the area around Brussels go more smoothly?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4721/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4721/05
Om: Undersøgelse af tilhørsforholdsbestemmelserne i henholdsvis dobbeltbeskatningsaftaler og i forordning (EØF) nr. 1408/­71
Subject: Study on allocation rules under double taxation agreements and designation rules under Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71
Ifølge artikel 293 i den nugældende EF-­traktat skal medlemsstaterne hindre, at borgerne dobbeltbeskattes.
Under Article 293 of the current EC Treaty, Member States are required to take steps to prevent double taxation of citizens.
Artikel 39 regulerer arbejdstagernes frie bevægelighed.
Article 39 lays down the right to freedom of movement for workers.
I en lang række tilfælde hindres arbejdstagernes frie bevægelighed af, at tilhørsforholdsbestemmelserne om personbeskatning i de forskellige dobbeltbeskatningsaftaler er i modstrid med de tilsvarende bestemmelser i forordningen om social sikring.
In a large number of cases, freedom of movement for workers is hindered because the allocation rules in respect of personal income tax laid down in double taxation agreements are at odds with the designation rules laid down in the coordinating regulation on social security.
I praksis sker det, at arbejdstagere på uddannelsesområdet i de første to år fortsat beskattes i bopælslandet og fra første arbejdsdag er socialt sikret i arbejdslandet.
In practice, those working in the field of education continue to be taxed in their country of residence during the first two years of their employment, whilst from day one of being employed they are insured under the social security arrangements in the country of employment.
For så vidt angår arbejdstagere (grænsearbejdere) inden for international godstransport, medfører beskatningsaftalerne ofte, at disse beskattes i bopælslandet og er socialt sikret i den stat, hvor arbejdstageren er etableret.
In the case of border workers employed in international road haulage, taxation agreements often lead to workers being taxed in their country of residence and insured under the social security arrangements in the country where their employer has its registered office.
Ved udstationering på over 183 dage er der ligeledes en forskel mellem beskatning (arbejdsland) og opkrævning af præmier til social sikring (det land, hvorfra personen er udstationeret).
In the case of postings of more than183 days, a difference also arises between the levying of taxes (country in which the person works) and the levying of contributions (country from which the worker is posted).
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4722/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4722/05
Dette spørgsmål er blevet lavet om til et mundtligt spørgsmål H-­1129/­05.
This question has been transformed into Oral Question H-1129/05 .
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4723/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4723/05
Om: Gratis rejser for pensionister
Subject: Free travel for pensioners
Vil Kommissionen være modstander af den irske regerings planer om at give et gratis rejsepas til irske pensionister, der lever i udlandet?
Would the Commission have an objection to moves by the Irish Government to grant a free travel pass to Irish pensioners living abroad?
Hvad er den nuværende situation for planerne om at indføre et europæisk rejsepas for pensionister eller for personer over 60?
What is the current situation with plans to introduce a European travel pass for pensioners or the over-60s?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4724/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4724/05
Vil Kommissionen sørge for, at direktivet om fjernsyn uden grænser indeholder et obligatorisk krav om tegnsprog eller tekstning af udsendelser for personer med indlæringsvanskeligheder, for at audiovisuelle tjenester reelt stilles til rådighed for alle borgere i hele EU?
Will the Commission ensure that provision is made within the Television Without Frontiers Directive for those with hearing difficulties by way of a mandatory requirement of sign language or subtitling in broadcasting so that audiovisual services truly are accessible to all citizens throughout the EU?
Har Kommissionen overvejet andre skridt for at sikre, at dem med indlæringsvanskeligheder har samme adgang til fjernsynstjenester som andre borgere?
Have other steps been considered to ensuring that those with hearing difficulties have equal access to television services with other citizens?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4725/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4725/05
Om: Handicappede i institutioner
Subject: Disabled people in institutions
Hvad mener Kommissionen om den praksis, at store institutioner i Europa permanent eller i lange perioder stiller beboelse og dagligdagsfaciliteter og tjenester til rådighed udelukkende for personer, der har komplekse afhængighedsbehov, og som ikke nødvendigvis fremmer målet om handicappedes selvbestemmelse og lige deltagelse i samfundslivet?
What is the Commission’s view of the practice of large institutions across Europe permanently or for long periods of time providing housing and living facilities and services exclusively to persons with complex dependency needs and which do not necessarily further the goal of self-determination and equal participation of disabled people in community life?
Er Kommissionen enig i, at sådanne institutioner i givet fald bør erstattes af samfundsbaserede tjenester, som bedre fremmer de ovennævnte mål?
Would the Commission agree that where possible such institutions should be replaced by community-based services that do further the abovementioned goals?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4726/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4726/05
Om: EU's politik for bistand til personer
Subject: EU policy on personal assistance services
Har Kommissionen overvejet at udarbejde en EU-­politik for bistand til personer, for at de handicappede, som har brug for bistand og hjælp i deres dagligdag, har de samme muligheder som andre borgere?
Has the Commission considered bringing forward an EU-wide policy on personal assistance services so that those disabled people who need support and assistance in their everyday lives have the same opportunities as other citizens?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4727/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4727/05
Om: Personer udsat for flere former for forskelsbehandling
Subject: People who experience multiple discrimination
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet for at sikre rettighederne for personer, som udsættes for flere former for forskelsbehandling på grund af køn, race eller etnisk oprindelse, religion, alder eller seksuel orientering?
What measures have the Commission undertaken to safeguard the rights of people facing multiple discrimination, including discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion, age or sexual orientation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4728/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4728/05
Om: Struktureret høring af handicaporganisationer
Subject: Structured consultation with disability sector
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet for at sikre en struktureret høring af repræsentanter for handicaporganisationer enten på europæisk plan med inddragelse af Det Europæiske Handicapforum eller andre europæiske ngo'er, som repræsenterer forskellige særlige grupper af handicappede eller forældre til handicappede, der ikke kan repræsentere sig selv?
What actions have been undertaken by the Commission to ensure structured consultation with representative disability organisations, either at a European level involving the European Disability Forum or other European NGOs representing various impairment-specific groups of persons with disabilities, or with the parents of persons with disabilities unable to represent themselves?
Har Kommissionen planlagt andre yderligere foranstaltninger i fremtiden for at sikre, at denne høring finder sted?
Are any further actions planned in the future to ensure such consultation happens?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4729/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4729/05
Om: Udviklingssamarbejde og handicappede
Subject: Development cooperation and disability
Hvilke fremskridt er gjort med at gennemføre EU’s dokument om retningslinjer for handicappede og udviklingssamarbejde?
What progress has been made in implementing the EU guideline document on disability and development cooperation?
Har Kommissionen overvejet at udarbejde en særlig meddelelse om handicappede og udviklingssamarbejde, som fastsætter en tidsramme og konkrete mål for at behandle handicappedes behov i forbindelse med EU's udviklingssamarbejde og finansiering af bidrag?
Has the Commission considered drawing up a specific communication on disability and development cooperation setting up a timeframe and concrete targets to address the needs of people with disabilities in EU development cooperation and funding allocations?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4730/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4730/05
Om: Handicappede kvinder
Subject: Women with disabilities
Tager Kommissionens ligestillingspolitik særlig hensyn til handicappede kvinders interesser?
Are the interests of women with disabilities given specific recognition in the Commission’s equal opportunities policy?
Har Kommissionen fastsat mål for at fremme handicappede kvinders rolle inden for beskæftigelse, social inklusion og beslutningstagning?
Has the Commission set targets to promote the role of disabled women in the field of employment, social inclusion and decision-making?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4731/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4731/05
Om: Betingelser for, at vikarbureauer kan stille arbejdstagere til rådighed
Subject: Conditions for the supply of workers by temping agencies
Kommissionen bedes forelægge oplysninger om de betingelser, hvorunder de nederlandske myndigheder udsteder attester til nederlandske vikarbureauer om den lovgivning (E-­101-blanketter), der skal finde anvendelse på personer, der har bopæl i Polen?
Could the Commission clarify the conditions under which the Netherlands authorities issue proof of applicable legislation (E‑101 declarations) to temping agencies for Polish residents?
Hvor lang tid skal efter Kommissionens opfattelse en arbejdstager fra en medlemsstat (f.eks. Polen), der ansættes af et vikarbureau i en anden medlemsstat (Nederlandene), være socialt forsikret i den anden medlemsstat (Nederlandene), inden det nederlandske vikarbureau kan stille denne arbejdstager — med forbehold af den nederlandske lovgivning om social sikring — til rådighed for en virksomhed (Struik) i en anden medlemsstat (Belgien)?
In the Commission's view, how long must workers from a Member State (for example Poland) who are taken on by a temping agency in another Member State (Netherlands) be insured under the social security arrangements in the other Member State (Netherlands) before the Netherlands temping agency concerned may supply the workers — leaving them covered under Netherlands social security provisions — to a company (Struik) in another Member State (Belgium)?
Er Kommissionen rede til at lade forvaltningsudvalget udarbejde en udtalelse om den måde, hvorpå disse vikarbureauer opererer?
Is the Commission prepared to ask the Administrative Commission to issue an opinion on the way in which temping agencies operate?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4733/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4733/05
(15. december 2005)
(15 December 2005)
Om: Begrænsning af spredningen af fugleinfluenza
Subject: Restricting the spread of avian influenza
Der er en overhængende risiko for, at EU vil opleve flere tilfælde af fugleinfluenza i den kommende tid.
There is an imminent risk that the EU will be faced with several cases of avian influenza in the near future.
Jeg er bekendt med, at Kommissionen allerede har taget en række initiativer for at begrænse smitten, men jeg vil gerne stille følgende spørgsmål til Kommissionen vedrørende smitterisikoen fra emballage:
I am aware that the Commission has already taken a number of initiatives to restrict the disease but could the Commission answer the following question concerning the risk of infection from packaging?
Denne bestemmelse fortolkes i mange medlemsstater således, at der kun tages højde for synligt snavs.
In many Member States, this provision is interpreted in such a way that only visible dirt is taken into account.
Mener Kommissionen, at den omtalte artikel 36 skal fortolkes på en sådan måde, at også ikke synligt snavs er omfattet?
Is it the Commission's view that Article 36 should be interpreted as also covering invisible dirt?
Vil Kommissionen, hvis også ikke synligt snavs (bakterier og virus) er omfattet af artikel 36, gøre noget for at sikre en mere ensartet fortolkning af bestemmelsen?
If invisible dirt (bacteria and viruses) are also covered by Article 36, will the Commission take steps to ensure a more uniform interpretation of these provisions?
Svar afgivet på Kommissionens vegne af Mariann Fischer Boel
Answer given by Ms Fischer Boel on behalf of the Commission
(15. marts 2006)
(15 March 2006)
Siden 1999 har der i EU allerede været en række udbrud af aviær influenza i Italien, Nederlandene, Belgien og Tyskland.
Since 1999, the European Union has already experienced a number of outbreaks of Avian Influenza in Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany.
Veterinærforanstaltningerne indebærer bl.a. forbud mod forsendelse, flytning eller transport af dyr, æg og fjerkrækød, krav om nødslagtning, udsætning og bortskaffelse af dyr og krav om rengøring, desinfektion eller bortskaffelse af alle typer beholdere, herunder emballeringsmateriale, som det ærede medlem nævner i sin forespørgsel.
These veterinary measures foresee, among other things, the block of the shipment, movement or transport of live animals, eggs and poultrymeat, emergency slaughtering, culling and disposal of animals, as well as cleaning, disinfection or disposal of all types of containers, including the packaging material which is mentioned in the Honourable Member’s question.
Rådet (landbrugsministrene) vedtog på mødet den 20. december 2005 et nyt direktiv Rådets direktiv 2005/94/EF af 20. december 2005 om fællesskabsforanstaltninger til bekæmpelse af aviær influenza og om ophævelse af direktiv 92/­40/­EØF, EUT L 10 af 14.1.2006 om fællesskabsforanstaltninger til bekæmpelse af aviær influenza.
A new Council directive Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC, OJ L 10, 14.1.2006. on Community measures for the control of avian influenza has been adopted during the Council meeting of the Ministers for Agriculture on 20 December 2005.
Det afløser direktiv 92/­40/­EØF og skal gennemføres af medlemsstaterne i deres nationale lovgivning senest den 1. juli 2007.
This directive will replace Council Directive 92/40/EEC Council Directive 92/40/EEC of 19 May 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza, OJ L 167, 22.6.1992. and has to be transposed by the Member States into their national legislation by 1 July 2007 at the latest.
Ifølge det nye direktiv kan myndighederne i tilfælde af et udbrud give tilladelse til transport af æg fra spærrezoner til udpegede pakkerier, hvis de er pakket i engangsemballage og alle de biosikkerhedsforanstaltninger, som myndighederne kræver, anvendes.
In accordance with the new directive, the competent authority may, in the case of an outbreak, authorise the transport of eggs from restricted zones to designated packing centres provided that they are packed in disposable packing and that all bio-security measures required by the competent authority are applied.
Ved Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 853/­2004 fastsættes der endvidere særlige hygiejnebestemmelser for animalske fødevarer, mens Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1907/­90 Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1907/­90 af 26. juni 1990 om handelsnormer for æg, EFT L 173 af 6.7.1990 . om handelsnormer for æg og Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 2295/­2003 Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 2295/­2003 af 23. december 2003 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1907/­90 om handelsnormer for æg, EUT L 340 af 24.12.2003. om gennemførelsesbestemmelser til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1907/­90 gælder for afsætningen, præsentationen og kvaliteten af produkterne, men ikke vedrører de veterinære eller sundhedsmæssige aspekter.
Moreover, Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the Parliament and of the Council fixes specific hygiene rules applicable to food of animal origin while Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 of 26 June 1990 on certain marketing standards for eggs, OJ L 173, 6.7.1990. on certain marketing standards for eggs and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2295/03 Commission Regulation (EC) No 2295/2003 of 23 December 2003 introducing detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 on certain marketing standards for eggs, OJ L 340, 24.12.2003. introducing detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 cover the commercialisation, the presentation and the quality of products but do not cover veterinary and sanitary aspects.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4734/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4734/05
Om: Forureningsbekæmpelsesfartøjer i EU
Subject: EU anti-pollution vessels
Efter olietankeren Prestiges forlis meddelte Det Europæiske Agentur for Søfartssikkerhed (EMSA) Europa-Parlamentet, at der på permanent basis ville blive stationeret et forureningsbekæmpelsesfartøj i en galicisk havn.
Following the accident involving the Prestige the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) informed Parliament that an anti-pollution vessel would be permanently based at a Galician port.
Ifølge de seneste forlydender vil ingen af EU's syv forureningsbekæmpelsesfartøjer få base i Galicien, selv om EMSA fortsat er af den opfattelse, at Galicien på grund af sin geografiske beliggenhed er et prioriteret område.
It has recently become known that of the seven EU anti-pollution vessels, none will be based in Galicia, even though the EMSA still acknowledges that Galicia is a priority area on account of its geographical location.
Hvis Galicien er et prioriteret område, og EU ikke stationerer et forureningsbekæmpelsesfartøj der, må den indlysende konklusion være, at det system, EMSA har udarbejdet, ikke har fungeret korrekt.
If Galicia is a priority area and the EU does not station any anti-pollution vessel there, it would seem obvious that the system devised by the EMSA has not worked properly.
Kan Kommissionen tilslutte sig dette?
Does the Commission not agree?
Tilsyneladende har det faktum, at der ikke har været private spanske virksomheder involveret, forhindret stationeringen af et sådant fartøj i Galicien og samfinansieringen heraf.
The fact that Spanish private companies are not involved would appear to have prevented such a vessel from being stationed in Galicia and from being co-financed.
Er Kommissionen ikke enig i, at en så følsom sag som denne, der for nylig har medført meget alvorlige konsekvenser for Galicien, ikke bare kan ignoreres, så Galicien kommer til at stå uden et permanent stationeret fartøj, og at EU ikke blot kan retfærdiggøre denne tingenes tilstand under henvisning til, at der ikke var tilstrækkelige finansielle midler til rådighed?
Does the Commission think that such a sensitive issue which recently had such serious implications for Galicia can be ignored, that Galicia can be left without a permanent vessel and that the EU can justify this state of affairs by attributing it to a lack of financial resources?