natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer modtog finansiering under denne budgetpost, og hvor meget modtog den enkelte gruppe eller organisation i alt fra Kommissionen? —
which groups or organisations received funding under this budget line, and how much have they each received in total from the Commission? —
Hvilke kriterier lagde Kommissionen til grund for imødegåelse af ansøgninger om finansiering?
What criteria did the Commission apply for funding bids to be successful?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4581/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4581/07
Hvilke konferencer, møder, seminarer eller andre begivenheder har fundet sted under denne budgetpost? —
What conferences, meetings, seminars or other events took place under this budget line? —
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4582/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4582/07
Kommissionen bedes give nærmere oplysninger om fordelingen af udgifterne under budgetpost 15 06 09 i budgettet for 2007 — herunder særlig om følgende: —
Could the Commission please break down the expenditure from budget line 15 06 09 in Budget 2007 — in particular
Kommissionen bedes opliste de »Vort Europa«-sammenslutninger, organisationer, der fremmer den europæiske idé, sammenslutninger og foreninger med europæisk sigte og europæiske tænketanke, der har modtaget finansiering under denne budgetpost, og oplyse, hvor meget de enkelte organisationer i alt har modtaget fra Kommissionen.
Could the Commission list the ‘Our Europe associations’, ‘organisations advancing the idea of Europe’, ‘associations and federations of European interest’ and ‘European think tanks’ that have received funding under this budget line, and how much have they each received in total from the Commission?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4583/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4583/07
Kommissionen bedes give nærmere oplysninger om fordelingen af udgifterne under budgetpost 15 06 66 i budgettet for 2007 — herunder særlig om følgende: —
Could the Commission please break down the expenditure from budget line 15 06 66 in Budget 2007 — in particular
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer har modtaget finansiering under »Et aktivt civilsamfund i Europa« og »Sammen for Europa« under denne budgetpost, og hvor meget har den enkelte gruppe eller organisation i alt modtaget fra Kommissionen?
Which groups or organisations received funding under ‘Active civil society in Europe’ and ‘Together for Europe’ under this budget line, and how much have they each received in total from the Commission?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4584/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4584/07
Kommissionen bedes give nærmere oplysninger om fordelingen af udgifterne under budgetpost 19 03 06 i budgettet for 2007 — herunder særlig om følgende: —
Could the Commission please break down the expenditure from budget line 19 03 06 in Budget 2007 — in particular
Hvilke projekter eller begivenheder er gennemført under direkte ansvar af en særlig repræsentant for EU, der modtog finansiering fra Kommissionen?
any projects or events implemented under the direct responsibility of an EUSR that received Commission funding?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4585/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4585/07
Hvordan er finansieringen af »kommunikationsaktiviteter rettet mod borgerne i EU« og »styrkelse af offentlighedens opfattelse af EU« blevet fordelt, og hvilke grupper, organisationer, begivenheder og publikationer har modtaget finansieringen?
how the funding for ‘communication activities directed towards the citizens of the EU’ and ‘Address (ing) a weak public perception of the EU’ was allocated, and which groups, organisations, events and publications received the funding?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4586/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4586/07
Kommissionen bedes give nærmere oplysninger om fordelingen af udgifterne under budgetpost 22 04 02 i budgettet for 2007 — herunder særlig om følgende: —
Could the Commission please break down the expenditure from budget line 22 04 02 in Budget 2007 — in particular
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4587/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4587/07
Om: Budget for 2008
Subject: Budget 2008
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om den har fastlagt finansieringsprioriteter for budgetpost 15 02 22 (programmet livslang læring) på budgettet for 2008 — herunder navnlig: —
Has the Commission identified any funding priorities for budget line 15 02 22 (lifelong learning programme) in Budget 2008 — in particular
Hvor store beløb og hvor stor en procentdel af den samlede budgetpost vil blive bevilget til Jean Monnet‑programmet?
How much money, and what percentage of the total budget line, will be allocated to ‘Jean Monnet’ programmes?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4588/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4588/07
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om den har fastlagt finansieringsprioriteter for budgetpost XX 01 02 12 01 på budgettet for 2008 — herunder navnlig: —
Has the Commission identified any funding priorities for budget line XX 01 02 12 01 in Budget 2008 — in particular
Hvilke organisationer eller selskaber vil modtage betaling for varer eller tjenesteydelser under denne budgetpost?
any organisations or companies which will be paid for goods or services provided under this budget line?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4589/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4589/07
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer har ansøgt om eller er blevet tildelt finansiering under disse budgetposter, og hvor meget vil den enkelte gruppe eller organisation modtage?
any groups or organisations which have applied for funding, or have been allocated funding, from this budget line, and how much will they each receive?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4590/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4590/07
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4591/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4591/07
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer har ansøgt om eller er blevet tildelt finansiering under disse budgetposter, og hvor meget vil den enkelte gruppe eller organisation modtage?
any groups or organisations which have applied for funding, or have been allocated funding from this budget line, and how much will they each receive?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4592/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4592/07
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om den har fastlagt finansieringsprioriteter for budgetpost 04 04 02 — herunder navnlig: —
Has the Commission identified any funding priorities for budget lines 04 04 02 — in particular
Hvor store er de administrative udgifter, herunder udgifterne til underholdning og catering? —
administrative expenditure, including entertainment and catering expenditure, —
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer har ansøgt om eller vil modtage finansiering via Det Europæiske Institut for Ligestilling?
any groups or organisations that have applied for, or will receive, any money from the Gender Institute?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4593/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4593/07
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om den har fastlagt finansieringsprioriteter for budgetpost 04 03 03 02 — herunder navnlig: —
Has the Commission identified any funding priorities for budget lines 04 03 03 02 — in particular
Kan Kommissionen præcisere, hvad den forstår ved »informations- og uddannelsesforanstaltninger«?
Can the Commission explain what it means by ‘information and training measures’?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4594/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4594/07
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om den har fastlagt finansieringsprioriteter for budgetpost 04 05 01 — herunder navnlig: —
Has the Commission identified any funding priorities for budget line 04 05 01 — in particular
På hvilke betingelser vil finansieringen blive tildelt?
On what terms will the funding be allocated?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4595/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4595/07
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer har ansøgt om eller vil modtage finansiering under denne budgetpost, og hvor meget vil den enkelte gruppe eller organisation modtage?
which groups or organisations have applied for, or will receive funding from this budget line, and how much will they each receive?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4596/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4596/07
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om den har fastlagt finansieringsprioriteter for budgetpost 07 03 07 — herunder navnlig: —
Has the Commission identified any funding priorities for budget line 07 03 07 — in particular
Hvor mange midler er der blevet eller vil der blive bevilget til »visse driftsmæssige aktiviteter i ikke‑statslige organisationer, som først og fremmest er aktive inden for miljøbeskyttelse og ‑forbedring på EU‑plan«, og hvilke ikke‑statslige organisationer har ansøgt om eller vil modtage disse midler?
What funding has been or will be allocated to ‘certain operational activities of non-governmental organisations that are primarily active in protecting and enhancing the environment at European level’, and which non-governmental organisations have applied for or will receive this funding?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4597/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4597/07
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer har ansøgt om eller vil modtage finansiering under denne budgetpost, og hvor meget vil den enkelte gruppe eller organisation modtage? —
which groups or organisations have applied for, or will receive funding from this budget line, and how much will they each receive? —
Hvordan definerer Kommissionen et »ikke‑nationalt europæisk værk« eller en »ikke‑national europæisk film«?
How does the Commission define a ‘non-national European work’ or a ‘non-national European film’?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4598/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4598/07
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om den har fastlagt finansieringsprioriteter for budgetpost 15 01 04 66 — herunder navnlig: —
Has the Commission identified any funding priorities for budget line 15 01 04 66 — in particular
Hvilke konferencer, møder eller andre begivenheder planlægges gennemført under denne budgetpost? —
What conferences, meetings or other events are planned under this budget line? —
Hvilke publikationer vil blive delvist eller fuldt ud finansieret under denne budgetpost?
Which publications will be partially or fully funded by this budget line?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4599/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4599/07
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer vil modtage finansiering under »Europæisk integration på universiteterne« under denne budgetpost, og hvor meget vil den enkelte gruppe eller organisation modtage i 2008? —
which groups or organisations will receive funding under the ‘European integration in universities’ heading of this budget line, and how much will they each receive in 2008? —
Hvilke konferencer, møder eller andre begivenheder planlægges gennemført under »Europæisk integration på universiteterne« under denne budgetpost? —
What conferences, meetings or other events are planned under the ‘European integration in universities’ heading of this budget line? —
Hvilke publikationer vil blive delvist eller fuldt ud finansieret under »Europæisk integration på universiteterne« under denne budgetpost?
Which publications will be partially or fully funded under the ‘European integration in universities’ heading of this budget line?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4600/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4600/07
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer har ansøgt om eller vil modtage finansiering under denne budgetpost, og hvor meget vil den enkelte gruppe eller organisation modtage i 2008? —
which groups or organisations have applied for, or will receive funding from this budget line, and how much will they each receive in 2008? —
Hvad forstår Kommissionen ved »tilhørsforhold til EU«, og har det noget specielt at gøre med europæisk borgerskab? —
What does the Commission mean by ‘citizenship’, and does it have particular regard to European citizenship? —
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4601/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4601/07
Hvilke konferencer, møder, seminarer eller andre begivenheder planlægges gennemført under denne budgetpost? —
What conferences, meetings, seminars or other events are planned under this budget line? —
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4602/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4602/07
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om den har fastlagt finansieringsprioriteter for budgetpost 15 06 09 — herunder navnlig: —
Has the Commission identified any funding priorities for budget line 15 06 09 — in particular
Hvilke »Vort Europa«-sammenslutninger, organisationer, der fremmer den europæiske idé, sammenslutninger og foreninger med europæisk sigte og europæiske tænketanke har ansøgt om eller vil modtage finansiering under denne budgetpost, og hvor meget vil de enkelte organisationer modtage i 2008?
could the Commission list the ‘Our Europe associations’, ‘organisations advancing the idea of Europe’, ‘associations and federations of European interest’ and ‘European think tanks’ that have applied for or will receive funding under this budget line, and how much will they each receive in 2008?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4603/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4603/07
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om den har fastlagt finansieringsprioriteter for budgetpost 15 06 66 — herunder navnlig: —
Has the Commission identified any funding priorities for budget line 15 06 66 — in particular
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer har ansøgt om eller vil modtage finansiering under »Et aktivt civilsamfund i Europa« og »Sammen for Europa« under denne budgetpost, og hvor meget vil den enkelte gruppe eller organisation modtage i 2008?
Which groups or organisations have applied for, or will receive funding under ‘Active civil society in Europe’ and ‘Together for Europe’ under this budget line, and how much will they each receive in 2008?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4604/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4604/07
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om den har fastlagt finansieringsprioriteter for budgetpost 19 03 06 — herunder navnlig: —
Has the Commission identified any funding priorities for budget line 19 03 06 — in particular
Hvilke projekter eller begivenheder planlægges gennemført under direkte ansvar af en særlig repræsentant for EU, der modtager finansiering fra Kommissionen?
any projects or events that are planned under the direct responsibility of an EUSR that received Commission funding?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4605/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4605/07
Kommissionens finansiering af kommunikationsaktiviteter rettet mod borgerne i EU og af aktiviteter til imødegåelse af borgernes svage opfattelse af EU?
the Commission’s funding activities involving ‘communication activities directed towards the citizens of the EU’ and ‘Address (ing) a weak public perception of the EU’?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4606/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4606/07
Hvilke grupper eller organisationer har ansøgt om eller vil modtage finansiering under denne budgetpost, og hvor meget vil den enkelte gruppe eller organisation få? —
which groups or organisations have applied for, or will receive funding from this budget line, and how much they will each receive? —
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4607/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4607/07
Om: Politisk udpegning af generaldirektøren for OLAF
Subject: OLAF Director-General as political appointee
I min tidligere forespørgsel E‑0997/­07 gjorde jeg opmærksom på, at repræsentanter for en medlemsstat skulle have udøvet et meget kraftigt politisk pres med henblik på genudnævnelsen af Franz‑Hermann Brüner som generaldirektør for Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF).
In my earlier Question E‑0997/07, I indicated the strong political interference that is said to have been exercised by the representatives of one Member State to achieve the re-appointment of Mr Franz-Hermann Brüner as Director-General of the EU’s anti-fraud office OLAF.
Jeg gjorde navnlig opmærksom på, at to gruppeformænd i Parlamentet skulle have medvirket hertil, og jeg anmodede om nærmere oplysninger om det faktiske hændelsesforløb.
I specifically indicated that two presidents of political groups in the European Parliament were allegedly instrumental in this and I asked for a clarification of what actually happened.
Den 27. juni 2005 forelagde et panel med deltagelse af eksterne eksperter en liste for CCA/CCN med de syv bedste kandidater til stillingen som generalsekretær i OLAF med en mulig tilføjelse af fire kandidater, som havde opnået færre points.
On 27 June 2005, a panel including external experts recommended to the CCA/CCN a shortlist of the seven best candidates to be considered for the post of Director-General of OLAF, with a possible addition of four candidates who scored less.
Efter behandlingen i CCA fremlagde Kommissionen imidlertid en liste med fem kandidater, og hr. Brüner var nu blandt de fem bedste kandidater. —
However, after the CCA, the Commission presented a shortlist of five candidates, Mr Brüner was now among these five best candidates. —
Velinformerede medlemmer i Parlamentet fortalte mig, at både hr. Pöttering og hr. Schulz, formænd for de to største politiske grupper i Parlamentet, lagde et stort pres på deres koordinatorer i Budgetkontroludvalget (COCOBU) med henblik på genudnævnelse af hr. Brüner som generaldirektør i OLAF. —
Well-informed MEPs told me that both Mr Pöttering and Mr Schulz, chairs of the two biggest political groups in the EP, exercised heavy pressure on their coordinators in the Budgetary Control Committee (Cocobu) to recommend Mr Brüner for reappointment as DG of OLAF. —
På trods af dette pres pegede Budgetkontroludvalget ikke på hr. Brüner som den bedste kandidat. —
Despite this pressure, Mr Brüner was not recommended as the best candidate by the EP’s Cocobu. —
I Financial Times (februar 2006) blev kommissær Kallas citeret for at sige, at hr. Brüners udnævnelse var sket på baggrund af pres fra Europa-Parlamentet. —
Commissioner Kallas was quoted in the Financial Times (February 2006) saying that Mr Brüner's appointment was the result of pressure coming from the EP. —
Lige før udnævnelsen af generaldirektøren for OLAF blev jeg ringet op af en tjenestemand fra Kommissionen.
Just before the moment when the appointment of the DG of OLAF was due to take place, I received a phone call from a Commission official.
Han fortalte mig, at det kraftige politiske pres fra tyske repræsentanter forpurrede udvælgelsesproceduren.
He told me that the heavy political pressure coming from German representatives was frustrating the selection procedure.
Han spurgte mig, om jeg ville være villig til at stille kritiske spørgsmål desangående med henblik på at bringe fokus tilbage på de faglige kvalifikationer hos de kandidater, som Kommissionen, Rådet og Parlamentet havde foreslået.
He asked me whether I would be willing to ask critical questions about this matter in an effort to focus again on the professional qualities of the candidates that had been proposed by Commission, Council and Parliament.
Hvilke konkrete skridt tog repræsentanter fra den tyske kansler Merkels kontor i forhold til Kommissionen for at fremme genudnævnelsen af Franz‑Hermann Brüner? 4.
What precise action did representatives of the office of the German Chancellor, Mrs Merkel, take towards the European Commission to promote the re-appointment of Franz-Hermann Brüner?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4608/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4608/07
Om: Uregelmæssigheder i forbindelse med besættelsen af direktørstillinger i OLAF og logisk viden om en interessekonflikt hos et medlem i udvælgelseskomitéen
Subject: Irregular selection procedure for OLAF directors: knowledge of a conflict of interest position of a member of the pre-selection panel
I min tidligere skriftlige forespørgsel E‑999/­07 rejste jeg spørgsmålet om interessekonflikter i forbindelse med besættelsen af to ledige direktørstillinger i OLAF.
In my previous parliamentary Question E‑0999/07, I addressed the issue of the conflict of interest with regard to the filling of 2 vacant directors' posts in OLAF.
Kommissionen angav i sit svar af 22. maj 2007, at der blot havde været tale om en mulig interessekonflikt, og at generaldirektøren for OLAF havde handlet korrekt ved at udskifte den pågældende tjenestemand i udvælgelseskomitéen.
The Commission answered on 22 May 2007, that there had been just a potential conflict of interest and that the Director-General of OLAF had acted correctly by removing this official from the pre-selection panel.
Anerkender Kommissionen, at der var tale om en reel interessekonflikt, idet den pågældende tjenestemand i Kommissionen var medlem af en udvælgelseskomité, der skulle udpege direktørerne i OLAF, samtidig med at hun var genstand for en OLAF-undersøgelse?
Does the Commission acknowledge the fact that a Commission official was in a real conflict of interest position when she was member of a pre-selection panel for directors of OLAF and at the same time also subject to an OLAF enquiry?
Hvis ikke, hvorfor blev hun så udskiftet i komitéen?
If not, why was she then replaced on the panel?
Anerkender Kommissionen, at kontorchefen for interne undersøgelser i OLAF havde kendskab til denne interessekonflikt fra starten, da han både var kandidat i udvælgelsesproceduren såvel som ledelsesmæssig ansvarlig for den pågældende OLAF‑undersøgelse?
Does the Commission acknowledge the fact that the OLAF Head of Unit for internal investigations knew about this conflict of interest position from the start, as he was both a candidate in the pre-selection procedure as well as hierarchically responsible for the OLAF enquiry in question?
I den pågældende sag er der kun tre personer, som den pågældende kontorchef behørigt set kunne underrette om situationen: —
For this Head of Unit there are only three suitable members of hierarchy to report to in this case.
Han kunne enten underrette sin direktør, Alberto Perduca, om den pågældende tjenestemands interessekonflikt, —
He would either report the conflict of interest of this lady to his director Mr Alberto Perduca, or to director Nick Ilett, who was a member of the pre-selection panel with the lady in question, or directly to Franz-Hermann Brüner, also a pre-selection panel member with the lady in question.
eller direktør Nick Ilett, der var medlem af samme udvælgelseskomité som den pågældende tjenestemand, —
After having received this information himself, either directly or through the hierarchy, Mr Brüner should have taken immediate steps to end this situation of conflict of interest.
Derfor har enten kontorchefen, eller (en af) direktørerne, eller hr. Brüner selv i sagens natur ikke opfyldt deres forpligtelser til at træffe øjeblikkelige foranstaltninger, så snart de fik kendskab til denne interessekonflikt.
This makes it inevitable that either the Head of Unit, or (one of) the directors, or Mr Brüner himself, did not fulfil their duties to take immediate action as soon as they had knowledge of this conflict of interest.
Er Kommissionen nu, hvor det er åbenlyst, at hverken kontorchefen, en af direktørerne eller generaldirektøren for OLAF opfyldte deres forpligtelser, og da OLAF er en tjenestegren i Kommissionen, indstillet på at indlede en undersøgelse af denne sag, der enten skal gennemføres af det særlige disciplinære direktorat (IDOC) i Kommissionen, der blev oprettet med dette formål, eller af et andet uafhængigt organ, således at der kan foretages en vurdering af disse mulige faglige forseelser?
Now that it is evident that either a Head of Unit, a Director or the Director-General of OLAF did not fulfil their professional duties, and since OLAF is a Commission department, is the Commission willing to open an enquiry into this case, to be performed either by the specialist department (IDOC) that was created for this purpose in the European Commission, or by another independent body, in order that these indications towards professional wrongdoing can be assessed?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4609/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4609/07
Om: Uregelmæssigheder i forbindelse med besættelsen af direktørstillinger i OLAF og generaldirektørens hukommelse
Subject: Irregular selection procedure for OLAF directors: the memory of the Director-General
Den 16. juli 2007 kl. 19.39 sendte OLAF's talsmand, Alessandro Buttice, en mail til de ansatte i OLAF, hvori han underrettede dem om OLAF's svar og officielle synspunkter, når de blev stillet over for spørgsmål fra pressen på disse områder.
On 16 July 2007 at 7.39 pm, OLAF spokesperson Mr Alessandro Buttice sent a mail to the staff of OLAF, informing them of the state of play concerning OLAF’s replies and official viewpoints with regard to the press asking questions on these subjects.
Samme dag gav hr. Brüner møde for Parlamentets Budgetkontroludvalg.
On that same day, Mr Brüner appeared before EP’s Committee on Budgetary Control.