natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Om: Tilladelse til opførelse af varmeværk i kommunen Mequinenza (Zaragoza), uden at de berørte parters ret til at blive hørt er blevet respekteret
Subject: Planning permission for the Mequinenza thermal power station (Saragossa): failure to respect the right of interested parties to be heard
Hvad angår den sag, der var genstand for en skriftlig forespørgsel af 15. september 2009 ( P-4408/09 ), er der opstået nye uregelmæssigheder i forbindelse med autorisationsprocessen vedrørende opførelsen af varmeværket i kommunen Mequinenza.
Regarding the subject of the question tabled on 15 September 2009 (P‑4408/09), there were further irregularities in the procedure for authorising the construction of a thermal power station in the municipality of Mequinenza.
I løbet af indsigelsesperioden efter offentliggørelsen af varmeværksprojektet i det spanske statstidende fremsatte foreningen Plataforma Almatret Net de Ecologistas en Acción indsigelser og anmodede om, at tilladelsen blev afvist, og om at foreningen blev part i sagen for dermed at få ret til at blive hørt i forbindelse med sagen.
Within the time allowed for lodging claims after the notice concerning the power station project had been published in the Boletín Oficial del Estado (Spanish official gazette), the ‘Almatret Net’ campaign alliance, set up by Ecologistas en Acción (Ecologists in Action), called for planning permission to be refused, submitted statements in support of its claim, and asked to treated as a party to the proceedings and hence given the right to be heard.
Tilladelsen og offentliggørelsen heraf fandt sted, uden at retten til at blive hørt, der er omhandlet i § 84 i lov 30/92, er blevet respekteret.
The planning permission was granted and published in spite of the failure to respect the right to be heard, as laid down in Article 84 of Law 30/92.
I hr. Dimas svar af 9. oktober 2009 stod der følgende: »Kommissionen følger nøje op på gennemførelsen af de relevante juridiske fællesskabsinstrumenter, og den er ikke bekendt med, at disse direktiver er blevet tilsidesat i det konkrete tilfælde.«
The answer given by Mr Dimas on 9 October 2009 stated that ‘The Commission … [was] closely monitoring the implementation of the relevant Community legal instruments and … [was] not aware of an infringement of these Directives in this particular case’.
Er Kommissionen klar over de fejl, der er begået i forbindelse med den administrative sagsbehandling af projektet om varmeværket i Mequinenza?
Does the Commission know about the flaws in the administrative procedure used to deal with the Mequinenza thermal power station project?
Hvorledes forholder Kommissionen sig til denne situation?
How does it view that state of affairs?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at den i dette tilfælde burde anvende forsigtighedsprincippet, der normalt anvendes i de tilfælde, hvor der er risiko for den offentlige sundhed eller miljøet, i betragtning af værkets omfattende forurening?
As far as this case is concerned, does not the Commission consider that the proper course would be to apply the precautionary principle normally observed where there are risks to public health or the environment, bearing in mind the high degree of pollution that the power station would generate?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0230/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0230/10
Om: Sikkerhed ved anvendelse af og kontrolcertifikater for den elektroniske cigaret
Subject: Safety and certification of electronic cigarettes
I forbindelse med medlemsstaternes indførelse af foranstaltninger til at kontrollere rygning med det formål at forbedre de europæiske borgeres sundhed, kan man blandt rygende forbrugere konstatere en øget interesse for den elektroniske cigaret, som producenterne præsenterer som en sund måde at ryge på.
While the Member States have been implementing measures to control smoking and thereby improve the health of European citizens, there has been a growing interest among smokers in electronic cigarettes, which the manufacturers are portraying as a healthy method of smoking.
Ifølge laboratorieforsøg foretaget af den amerikanske levnedsmiddel- og medicinaladministration (FDA) har man dog fundet kræftfremkaldende og giftige stoffer i prøverne fra to store firmaer, der producerer elektroniske cigaretter.
However, laboratory checks carried out by the US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) have detected carcinogenic and toxic chemical substances in samples of electronic cigarettes manufactured by two major companies.
Desuden har Verdenssundhedsorganisationen (WHO) udsendt en advarsel om ikke at anvende elektroniske cigaretter, idet den påpeger, at der ikke findes et eneste videnskabeligt bevis på, at de er sikre, eller at de hjælper rygere til at holde op med at ryge.
Moreover, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has issued a warning not to use electronic cigarettes, noting that there is absolutely no scientific evidence to show that they are safe or help smokers to give up smoking.
I henhold til folkesundhedsorganisationer har den elektroniske cigaret desuden unge mennesker som målgruppe, og den kan vise sig at være »indgangsdøren« til den normale cigaret.
Furthermore, according to public health organisations, electronic cigarettes are targeted at young people and may act as a ‘gateway’ to normal cigarettes.
Har EU faste sikkerhedsstandarder for fremstilling, import og handel med de specifikke produkter på det europæiske marked? 3.
Are there specific EU safety standards applicable to the manufacture, import and distribution of these products on the European market?
Findes der disponible statistiske oplysninger om, at medlemsstater har blokeret for eller tilbagekaldt sådanne produkter?
Are there any statistics concerning Member States' impounding or withdrawal of such devices?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0231/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0231/10
Om: Overensstemmelse mellem bilforsikringer
Subject: Consistency of car insurance
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger, som rejser mellem Det Forenede Kongerige og Italien.
I have been contacted by a constituent who spends time between the UK and Italy.
Han kører en bil i London, der er indregistreret i Italien, da han i Italien kan købe en bilforsikring, der giver 12 måneders dækning for kørsel i resten af EU.
He drives an Italian‑registered car in London because in Italy he is able to purchase an insurance policy that provides 12‑month coverage for the rest of the EU.
Hvis han skulle indregistrere sin bil i Det Forenede Kongerige, ville han kun kunne opnå seks måneders dækning for kørsel i resten af EU.
If he were to register his car in the UK, he would only be able to get a maximum of six months' insurance cover for driving in the rest of the EU.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse følgende: 1.
Could the Commission confirm: 1.
Er det i strid med reglerne for det indre marked, at vælgeren kun kan opnå seks måneders forsikringsdækning for kørsel i resten af EU, hvis han forsikrer en britisk indregistreret bil i Det Forenede Kongerige, hvorimod han kan opnå 12 måneders forsikringsdækning for kørsel i resten af EU, hvis han forsikrer en italiensk indregistreret bil i Italien? 2.
Whether the fact that my constituent is only able to purchase six months' car insurance for the rest of the EU if insuring a British-registered car in Britain, while being able to get 12 months' car insurance for the rest of the EU if insuring an Italian-registered car in Italy is in breach of the single market? 2.
Agter Kommissionen at tage spørgsmålet om denne uoverensstemmelse op til behandling med de forsikringsselskaber, der sælger bilforsikringer i Det Forenede Kongerige?
Whether it intends to raise this inconsistency with companies offering car insurance in Britain?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0232/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0232/10
Om: Professor Davinderpal Singh Bhullar
Subject: Professor Davinderpal Singh Bhullar
Han fik afslag på sin asylansøgning og blev overgivet til det indiske politi af de tyske myndigheder.
His asylum application was unsuccessful and he was handed over to the Indian police by the German officials.
Vælgeren hævder, at professor Davinderpal Singh Bhullar siden da har tilbragt 15 år i fængsel, og at han efter retssagen blev dømt til døden den 17. december 2002.
My constituent has alleged that Professor Davinderpal Singh Bhullar has since spent 15 years in prison and, after his trial, was sentenced to death on 17 December 2002.
Han hævder endvidere, at professor Davinderpal Singh Bhullar har været isolationsfængslet i de sidste syv år, mens han afventer eksekveringen af dommen.
My constituent also alleges that Professor Davinderpal Singh Bhullar has been held in solitary confinement for the past seven years while he waits for his sentence to be carried out.
Vælgeren ønsker at vide, hvilket pres Kommissionen lægger på den indiske regering og præsident med henblik på opnåelse af følgende: 1.
My constituent would like to know what pressure the Commission is putting on the Indian Government and President to: 1.
fuld gennemgang af professorens sag i overensstemmelse med international ret.
Carry out a full review of the Professor's case in accordance with international law.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0233/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0233/10
Om: Direktiv 1999/44/EF og handelsvarer
Subject: EU Directive 1999/44/EC and commercial products
En af mine vælgere har kontaktet mig for at blive orienteret om et EF-direktiv om garantier, som hun har hørt skal inkorporeres i britisk lovgivning.
A constituent of mine has contacted me to enquire about an EU directive regarding warranties which she has heard is going to be incorporated into UK law.
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at direktiv 1999/44/EF også dækker handelsvarer som f.eks. serviceelevatorer eller elevatorer i boligbyggerier?
Could the Commission confirm whether Directive 1999/44/EC also covers commercial products such as lifts or elevators in residential blocks?
I benægtende fald, kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at der findes et andet direktiv, som dækker handelsvarer som f.eks. serviceelevatorer eller elevatorer i boligbyggerier?
If not, could the Commission confirm whether there exists another directive covering commercial products such as lifts or elevators in residential blocks?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0234/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0234/10
Om: Kropsscannere til anvendelse i lufthavne
Subject: Body scanners for use in airports
Europa-Kommissionen er i færd med at udarbejde en rapport med henblik på eventuel regulering af anvendelsen af kropsscannere i europæiske lufthavne, hvorved der rejses alvorlige spørgsmål om beskyttelsen af privatlivets fred.
The European Commission is working on a report with a view to a possible regulation on the use of body scanners in European airports, which raise serious issues regarding personal privacy.
Det indstillede kommissionsmedlem, Viviane Reding, udtalte i sin høring i Europa-Parlamentet, at kropsscannere skal anvendes som en rimelig reaktion på den pågældende trussel (ligesom anvendelsen heraf skal være frivillig i medlemsstaterne og ikke medføre sundhedsrisici), og man skal sikre, at billederne destrueres umiddelbart efter.
Commissioner-designate Viviane Reding said in her hearing in the European Parliament that body scanners must (as well as being voluntary in Member States and involving no health implications) be a proportionate response to the threat and provide for immediate destruction of images.
Men ifølge den førende amerikanske organisation med speciale i privatlivets fred (EPIC), der har baseret sin rapport på dokumenter, som er indhentet via anmodninger om informationsfrihed, har Transportation Security Administration under det amerikanske Department of Homeland Security inkluderet et krav i udbudsspecifikationer og købskontrakter om, at kropsscannere skal kunne lagre, registrere og overføre billeder.
But according to the leading American privacy organisation EPIC, which has based its report on documents obtained through freedom of information requests, the Transportation Security Administration, part of the US Department of Homeland Security, has included in tender specifications and vendor contracts a requirement that body scanners have the capacity to store, record and transfer images.
Dette kan medføre meget skadelige og uautoriserede afsløringer af følsomme personlige oplysninger og er tilsyneladende i strid med den amerikanske administrations offentlige løfter om, at billederne vil blive destrueret.
This could lead to deeply damaging unauthorised disclosure of sensitive personal data and apparently contradicts public pledges by the US administration that images would be destroyed.
Hvordan vil Kommissionen sikre — gennem regulering eller fysiske specifikationer — at det i forbindelse med anvendelsen af kropsscannere i Europa skal være forbudt at lagre og overføre billeder?
How will the Commission ensure, whether through regulation or through physical specifications, that any body scanners used in Europe really will bar the storage and transfer of images?
Hvem konsulterer Kommissionen om spørgsmål om databeskyttelse i forbindelse med den kommende rapport?
Whom is the Commission consulting with regard to data protection issues for its forthcoming report?
Kan Kommissionen love, at enhver EU-lovgivning om anvendelse af kropsscannere vil omfatte en bestemmelse om, at udbudsspecifikationer skal inkludere et krav om, at der ikke må være mulighed for at lagre, registrere eller overføre billeder?
Will the Commission pledge that any EU regulation on the use of body scanners would include a provision that the specifications for tender include a requirement that there should be no facility to store, record or transfer images?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0235/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0235/10
Om: Foranstaltninger til bekæmpelse af vold mod kvinder
Subject: Measures to combat violence against women
FN's generalsekretær, Kofi Annan, har udtalt, at vold mod kvinder nok er den mest beskæmmende og mest udbredte krænkelse af menneskerettighederne.
As the UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, said: ‘Violence against women is perhaps the most shameful human right violation, and it is perhaps the most pervasive.
Den kender ikke til geografiske, kulturelle eller økonomiske grænser.
It knows no boundaries of geography, culture or wealth.
Så længe det fortsætter, kan vi ikke påstå, at vi gør reelle fremskridt hen imod lighed, udvikling og fred.
As long as it continues, we cannot claim to be making real progress towards equality, development and peace.’
Beijing-handlingsprogrammet fra 1995, som blev vedtaget af FN, definerer vold mod kvinder som værende enhver kønsbestemt voldshandling, som medfører eller kan medføre skader eller lidelse af fysisk, seksuel eller psykologisk art — herunder trusler om at udøve sådanne handlinger, tvang eller vilkårlig frihedsberøvelse.
The 1995 Peking Platform for Action, adopted by the United Nations, defined violence against women as any act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual and psychological harm or suffering, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty.
Vold mod kvinder udgør en alvorlig krænkelse af menneskerettighederne, som besværliggør kvinders deltagelse i sociale aktiviteter og på arbejdsmarkedet.
Violence against women is a serious breach of human rights and is an obstacle to the participation of women in social activities and in the labour market.
Dataene om voldsepisoder mod kvinder er i stadig højere grad nedslående.
Moreover, the statistics concerning episodes of violence are increasingly discouraging.
Med resolution 54/134 af 17. december 1999 gjorde De Forenede Nationers Generalforsamling den 25. november til international dag for bekæmpelse af vold mod kvinder og opfordrede de nationale regeringer, de internationale organisationer og ngo'erne til at tilrettelægge aktiviteter med henblik på at fremme bevidstheden om problemet i civilsamfundet på denne dag.
It should also be pointed out that in its Resolution 54/134 of 17 December 1999, the General Assembly of the United Nations designated 25 November as the ‘International Day for the elimination of violence against women’ and called on governments, international organisations and NGOs to organise activities designed to raise public awareness of the problem on that day.
Finder Kommissionen ud fra ovenstående det ikke hensigtsmæssigt at iværksætte tiltag for at tilskynde medlemsstaterne til at udarbejde nationale politikker, der tager sigte på at bekæmpe vold mod kvinder?
In the light of the above, does the Commission not consider it advisable to take action to encourage the Member States to frame national policies to combat violence against women?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0236/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0236/10
Om: Løsning af indvandringsproblemet i Italien
Subject: Solutions to the problem of immigrants in Italy
I løbet af de seneste to årtier er Italien gået fra at være et udvandringsland til at være et land, der modtager mange indvandrere, hvilket afspejler den økonomiske vækst og efterspørgslen efter arbejdskraft i et samfund, hvor de ældres andel af befolkningen er den højeste i Europa, og hvor fødselsraten er den laveste i EU.
Over the past two decades, Italy has changed from a country of emigrants to a country that receives large numbers of immigrants, reflecting the economic growth and demand for labour in a society whose population has the largest proportion of elderly people in Europe and that has the lowest birth rate in the EU.
Den vold, der i begyndelsen af året brød ud i Rosarno – kulminationen på en foruroligende række fremmedfjendske og racistiske angreb – viser, at de italienske myndigheder enten ikke ønsker eller ikke er i stand til at løse det komplekse indvandringsproblem.
The violence that occurred at the beginning of the year in Rosarno — the culmination of a worrying series of xenophobic and racist attacks — shows that the Italian authorities are either unwilling or unable to resolve the complex problem of immigrants.
Den kendsgerning, at et helt samfund med 1 000 afrikanske indvandrere blev drevet ud af Rosarno, er et alarmsignal med hensyn til både den måde, hvorpå den italienske regering forsøger at gribe ind og styre det komplekse indvandringsproblem, og den tiltagende racisme i det italienske samfund, hvor navnlig højrefløjens presse spiller en vigtig rolle med hensyn til at sætte indvandrerne i et negativt lys og sprede et klima med intolerance og aggression over for østeuropæere og afrikanere.
The fact that an entire community of 1 000 African immigrants was driven away from Rosarno is an alarm signal in relation to both the way in which the Italian Government seeks to intervene in managing the complex problem of immigration and the growing racism at the heart of Italian society, with the right-wing press in particular playing a major role in casting immigrants in a negative light and spreading a climate of intolerance and aggression towards East Europeans and Africans.
Er Kommissionen bekymret over denne situation i en medlemsstat, som er hjem for 5 mio. indvandrere, men som bevæger sig længere og længere væk fra den multietniske og multikulturelle europæiske model?
Is the Commission concerned at this situation in a Member State which is home to 5 million immigrants, but which is moving further and further away from the multi-ethnic and multicultural European model?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil den i bekræftende fald iværksætte for at sikre, at menneskerettighederne overholdes, og for at opmuntre og hjælpe de italienske myndigheder med at finde effektive løsninger på et problem, der ikke kan blive ved med kun at blive løst med repressalier fra politiets side?
If so, what measures will it take to ensure that human rights are respected and to encourage and support the Italian authorities in finding effective solutions to a problem that cannot always continue to be addressed solely from the angle of police reprisals?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0237/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0237/10
Om: Køb af sygeforsikring uden for oprindelses- og opholdslandet
Subject: The purchase of health insurance outside one's country of birth and residence
Vi er blevet gjort opmærksomme på, at irske borgere (som er bosiddende i Irland og har irsk pas) ikke kan købe sygeforsikring i Det Forenede Kongerige – policer, som skulle gælde i hele EU – eftersom den irske regering har blokeret for gennemførelsen af sådanne transaktioner.
It has been brought to our attention that Irish citizens (who have residency in Ireland and an Irish passport) are unable to purchase health insurance in the UK — policies which would then apply to the whole of the EU — as the Irish Government has blocked such transactions from being completed.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med dette tiltag fra den irske regerings side?
Is the Commission aware of this move by the Irish Government?
Findes der præcedens for at forhindre borgerne i at købe private sygeforsikringer i et andet land end deres oprindelses- og opholdsland?
Is there any precedent for stopping one’ citizens from buying private health insurance in a country other than their country of birth and residence?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om et sådant tiltag er i overensstemmelse med EU's lovgivning?
Can the Commission confirm whether or not such a move complies with EC law?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0238/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0238/10
Om: Anmodning om udenlandske missioner til Gaza
Subject: Requests for foreign missions to visit Gaza
Irlands udenrigsminister, Micheal Martin, anmodede for nylig om, at der blev sendt udenlandske missioner til Gaza, og at det spanske formandskab fokuserede på bistand til områdets fattige borgere.
The Minister for Foreign Affairs of Ireland, Micheal Martin, has recently requested that foreign missions be sent to Gaza and that the relief of the impoverished citizens of the area be made a central part of the Spanish Presidency.
Hvor er man i behandlingen af denne anmodning?
What is the state of the aforementioned request?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0239/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0239/10
Om: 600 mio. euro til cykelfond
Subject: 600 million euro fund for cycling
I et svar på en skriftlig forespørgsel ( E-5281/09 ) fik jeg for nylig oplyst, at EU's strukturfonde og Samhørighedsfonden i perioden 2007-2013 har et anslået budget på over 600 mio. euro, som skal anvendes til gennemførelse af investeringer i cykelinfrastruktur i støtteberettigede regioner i hele EU.
In an answer to a recent Parliamentary Question (E‑5281/09), I was informed that ‘For the period 2007‑13, the EU's Structural and Cohesion Funds provide an estimated budget of over EUR 600 million, which will be used for the implementation of investment in cycle infrastructure in eligible regions across the EU.’
Kan Kommissionen sige, hvad disse 600 mio. euro helt præcist skal anvendes til?
Is it possible for the Commission to inform me what this 600 million euro will be spent on exactly?
Er midlerne blevet øremærket?
Have the funds been specifically earmarked yet?
Vil cykelprojekter i Dublin eller andre dele af Irland være berettigede til finansiering under dette forslag?
Would cycling projects in Dublin, or any other parts of Ireland be eligible to qualify for funding under this proposal?
Findes der et bestemt ministerium eller en bestemt myndighed i Irland, som har til opgave at fordele disse midler?
Is there any specific department or agency in Ireland which is charged with allocating these funds?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0240/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0240/10
Om: Status som »gammel by«
Subject: ‘Ancient city status’
Vil Kommissionen indføre en status som »gammel by« for at anerkende de byer i EU, som Dunfermline i Skotland, hvilket kunne indebære betydelige økonomiske fordele?
Will the Commission introduce ‘ancient city’ status to recognise cities in the EU such as Dunfermline in Scotland, which could have significant economic benefits?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0241/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0241/10
Om: Det europæiske alarmsystem
Subject: European alert system
Har Kommissionen planer om at revidere lovgivningen om personer i sundhedssektoren, som praktiserer i flere medlemsstater?
Does the Commission have any plans to revisit legislation concerning healthcare individuals practising in multiple Member States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0242/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0242/10