natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Heraf udledte Eurobarometer så, at de franske og nederlandske nej-sigere ikke havde stemt mod Den Europæiske Union (sammendrag i »Eurobarometer; French and Dutch voters did not say No to Europe«, EurActiv.com, 15. juni 2005).
Curiously, Eurobarometer concluded that ‘no’ voters in France and the Netherlands had not voted against the European Union (summary in: ‘Eurobarometer: French and Dutch voters did not say No to Europe’, EurActiv.com, 15 June 2005).
Hvad var de samlede omkostninger til disse tre undersøgelser?
What was the total cost of these three surveys?
Blev der også tilrettelagt andre undersøgelser af Kommissionen for disse folkeafstemninger?
Did the Commission organise any other surveys concerning the referendums?
Hvad var i bekræftende omkostningerne hertil?
If so, how much did they cost?
Hvad udgør omkostningerne til de to seneste efterfølgende undersøgelser i Frankrig og Nederlandene?
How much did the two most recent surveys — the post-referendum surveys in France and the Netherlands — cost?
Hvilke konklusioner drager Kommissionen af det forhold, at de pågældende undersøgelser ramte helt ved siden af?
What conclusions does the Commission draw from the fact that the survey findings were completely wide of the mark?
Hvad er konsekvenserne for Eurobarometer?
What are the consequences for Eurobarometer?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3915/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3915/05
Om: Omkostninger ved Eurobarometer
Subject: Cost of Eurobarometer
I perioden fra begyndelsen af maj og til midten af juni havde kun 47 % af europæerne et »positivt billede« af Den Europæiske Union.
In the period between mid-May and mid-June, only 47 % of people in Europe had a ‘positive image’ of the European Union.
Undersøgelsen synes ikke at have gjort indtryk på det »officielle Europa«.
‘Official Europe’ was not particularly impressed by these findings.
Den 3. oktober 2005 blev der indledt tiltrædelsesforhandlinger med Tyrkiet.
On 3 October 2005 the accession negotiations with Turkey began.
Hvad var omkostningerne til denne undersøgelse?
How much did the survey cost?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3916/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3916/05
Den socioøkonomiske situation i den russiske enklave Kaliningrad giver anledning til stor bekymring.
The socioeconomic situation in the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad is very worrying.
Levestandarden ligger under det russiske gennemsnit.
The standard of living is lower than the average for Russia.
Omkring 30 % af indbyggerne lever under sultegrænsen.
Some 30 % of its inhabitants are living below the poverty line.
Den russiske enklave er et af de steder, som har den højeste grad af hiv-infektioner i hele Europa.
The Russian enclave has one of the highest levels of HIV infection in Europe.
I det stadigvæk stærkt militariserede område er der omfattende miljøproblemer (»Kaliningrad and the EU: Facts and Figures«, MEMO/02/192 af 18. september 2002).
In addition, the territory, which is still highly militarised, has considerable environmental problems (‘Kaliningrad and the EU: Facts and Figures’, MEMO/02/192 — 18 September 2002).
Hvilken finansiel bistand har Kommissionen ydet siden 1992 til Den Russiske Føderation og via hvilke programmer med henblik på at forbedre den socioøkonomiske situation og situationen inden for folkesundheden i Kaliningrad?
What funding has the European Union provided to the Russian Federation, under what programmes, to improve economic and social conditions and public health in Kaliningrad since 1992?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvorledes Den Russiske Føderation investerer disse penge?
Can the Commission indicate how the Russian Federation invests this money?
Hvor ligger vanskelighederne?
What problems and difficulties exist?
På hvilke områder er der opnået mærkbare resultater?
In what sectors have perceptible results been achieved?
Via hvilke kanaler og hvordan skal Den Russiske Føderation aflægge beretning om anvendelsen af disse penge?
Through what channels and how is the Russian Federation required to report on the use made of this funding?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3917/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3917/05
Om: Lov om god forvaltningsskik
Subject: Law on proper administration
De fleste medlemsstater i Den Europæiske Union har en lov om de generelle principper for god forvaltningsskik.
Most EU Member States have a law on the general principles of proper administration.
De forskellige myndigheder i medlemsstaterne skal respektere disse principper, og borgerne kan i tilfælde af manglende overholdelse via en (administrativ) retsinstans eller en anden instans udvirke, at dette sker.
The various authorities in the Member States are required to respect these principles and, if they do not, members of the public can seek redress from an administrative or other court or some other institution.
I sin årsberetning for 2004 anfører Den Europæiske Ombudsmand Diamandouros, at en lov om god forvaltningsskik, som finder anvendelse på alle europæiske institutioner, ville have mange fordele.
In his Annual Report for 2004, the European Ombudsman, Mr Diamandouros, observes that a law on good administration applicable to all the European institutions would have many advantages.
Hvad er Kommissionens holdning til Diamandouros forslag?
What does the Commission think of Mr Diamandouros's proposal?
Har Kommissionen allerede forelagt et forslag i dette øjemed, eller er et sådant forslag under udfærdigelse?
Has the Commission already submitted a proposal along these lines, or is it currently drafting one?
Har Kommissionen planer om at forelægge et forslag til lovgivning i dette øjemed?
Will the Commission submit a proposal for legislation of this kind?
Hvad er i benægtende fald årsagerne hertil?
If not, why not?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3918/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3918/05
Om: Kontrol med moskeer
Subject: Surveillance of mosques
I en fortrolig beretning fra Det Europæiske Råd af 16.-17. december 2004 blev det allerede slået fast, at moskeer tjener som rekrutteringsplads for islamiske terrorister.
A confidential report for the European Council of 16-17 December 2004 already noted that mosques were one of the recruiting grounds for Islamic terrorists.
Denne rapport blev udarbejdet efter drøftelser mellem Rådets antiterrorgruppe og EU's taskforce af politichefer (EU's Police Chiefs Task Force) og er et bidrag til EU's langsigtede strategi vedrørende bekæmpelsen af terrorisme.
The report was drafted after talks between the Council's anti-terrorism group and the EU's Police Chiefs Task Force, and was intended as a contribution to a long-term EU strategy on combating terrorism.
I rapporten — hvis endelige udgave forventes i 2005 — tilrådes det, at Europol får bedre informationer om islamiske terrorister (David Cronin, »Call for EU-leaders to back scrutiny of mosques«, European Voice af 9.-15. december 2004).
The report, which is to be finalised before the end of 2005, recommends that Europol should do more to monitor Islamic terrorists (David Cronin, ‘Call for EU leaders to back scrutiny of mosques’, European Voice, 9-15 December 2004).
På det ekstraordinære møde mellem EU's indenrigsministre i juni 2005 skulle den franske indenrigsminister, Nicolas Sakozy, have foreslået, at der i fremtiden blev ført langt strengere kontrol med moskeerne.
At the extraordinary meeting of EU Ministers for Home Affairs in July 2005, France's Minister for Home Affairs, Nicolas Sarkozy, is said to have proposed that in future mosques should be monitored far more closely.
Sarkozys forslag skulle være blevet torpederet af den britiske indenrigsminister Charles Clarke (»UK turns down French proposal on surveillance of mosques«, Dhimmi Watch af 14. juni 2005; »Britain rejects surveillance of mosques«, DAWN International af 14. juli 2005).
His proposal was allegedly torpedoed by his British counterpart, Charles Clarke (‘UK turns down French proposal on surveillance of mosques’, Dhimmi Watch, 14 July 2005; ‘Britain rejects surveillance of mosques’, DAWN International, 14 July 2005).
Fremtrædende politikere i hele verden bekræfter desuagtet, at man bedre kan overvåge islamiske terrorister gennem kontroller af moskeer.
However, leading politicians all over the world support the idea that Islamic terrorists could be monitored more effectively by means of surveillance of mosques.
Ud over Günter Beckstein, CSU-indenrigsminister i Bayern, og hans kollega Uwe Schünemann, CDU-indenrigsminister i Sachsen, som slår til lyd for indsamling af informationer og vilkårlige kontroller i tyske moskeer (»Greater surveillance of German muslims«, Deutsche Welle den 14. juli 2005), er f.eks. også den australske premierminister John Howard (»Australian Prime Minister backs surveillance in mosques«, The New York Times af 24. august 2005) og guvernøren i den amerikanske delstat Massachusetts, Mitt Romney (»Wiretap mosques, Romney suggests«, The Boston Globe af 15. september 2005) store tilhængere heraf.
Besides Günter Beckstein, the CSU Minister for Home Affairs of Bavaria, and Uwe Schünemann, CDU Minister for Home Affairs of Saxony — who advocate gathering information and carrying out random checks at mosques in Germany (‘Greater surveillance of German Muslims’, Deutsche Welle , 14 July 2005) — the Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard, for example (‘Australian Prime Minister backs surveillance in mosques’, The New York Times , 24 August 2005) and the Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney (‘Wiretap mosques, Romney suggests’, The Boston Globe , 15 September 2005) are strongly in favour of such an approach.
Rådet bedes oplyse, hvorledes Sarkozys forslag på det pågældende møde nøjagtigt lød?
Can the Council indicate exactly what proposal Mr Sarkozy made at the meeting in question?
Betyder ovennævnte, at tanken med EU's kontrol af moskeer nu er blevet udsat på ubestemt tid, eller vil dette spørgsmål i løbet af kort tid blive sat på dagsordenen igen?
Does the above mean that the EU has now abandoned the idea of surveillance of mosques for the foreseeable future or will this issue be placed on the agenda again soon?
Strategien opstiller en tværfaglig tilgang til bekæmpelse af dette fænomen, idet det især er blevet besluttet: 1.
The strategy allows for a multidisciplinary approach to counteracting this phenomenon, in particular by resolving to: 1.
at sætte en stopper for netværks og enkeltpersoners hvervning af terrorister
disrupt the activities of networks and individuals who draw people into terrorism;
at sørge for, at flertallets holdning vinder hævd over ekstremisternes
ensure that voices of mainstream opinion prevail over those of extremism;
at gøre en endnu større indsats for at fremme sikkerhed, retfærdighed, demokrati og lige chancer for alle.
promote yet more vigorously security, justice, democracy and opportunity for all.
Hvad angår første punkt opstiller strategien bl.a. følgende konkrete tiltag (se punkt 9 i strategien):
With regard to the first point, the strategy provides, inter alia , for the following specific approach (see point 9 of the strategy):
»Vi vil begrænse de aktiviteter, der udfoldes af dem, der spiller en rolle i radikaliseringsprocessen, herunder i fængsler, på uddannelsessteder og steder, hvor der foregår religionsundervisning og -udøvelse, og ved at drøfte spørgsmålene i forbindelse med disse personers indrejse og ophold«.
‘We will limit the activities of those playing a role in radicalisation including in prisons, places of education or religious training, and worship, and by examining the issues around admittance and residence of such individuals.’
Disse elementer er i overensstemmelse med de forslag, flere delegationer fremkom med på den ekstraordinære samling i Rådet den 13. juli 2005.
These elements reflect the proposals put forward by several delegations at the extraordinary Council meeting on 13 July 2005.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3919/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3919/05
Om: Mindretal i Pakistan
Subject: Minorities in Pakistan
I august 2005 oplyste dominikanske og franske præster til FN's Menneskerettighedskomité, at Pakistan er prototypen på et land, hvor forskelsbehandling på grund af religion er forankret i loven.
In August 2005, Dominican and Franciscan priests appearing before the UN Human Rights Committee said that Pakistan was the prototype of a country where discrimination on grounds of religion is provided for by law.
Ifølge biskopperne i Pakistan overtrædes de religiøse mindretals rettigheder i Pakistan hele tiden.
According to the bishops in Pakistan, the rights of religious minorities in that country are constantly being violated.
De opfordrede i en beretning fra juni 2005 Pakistan til at give den særlige FN-rapportør, som er ansvarlig for religions- og trosfrihed, tilladelse til at undersøge situationen.
In a report which they produced in June 2005, they called for the UN Special Rapporteur responsible for freedom of religion and belief to be allowed to investigate the situation.
Endvidere blev landet anmodet om at ratificere de vigtigste relevante menneskerettighedskonventioner.
The country was also asked to ratify the principal human rights conventions concerned with this issue.
Gudsbespottelse i Pakistan kan medføre dødsstraf.
In Pakistan, blasphemy can be punished with the death penalty.
Siden 1988 er der blevet anmeldt 647 officielt undersøgte sager om gudsbespottelse, hvoraf næsten 90 sager var mod kristne (Ellen Teague, »Pakistani intolerance condemned«, The Tablet af 13. august 2005).
Since 1988, 647 official cases of blasphemy were reported, including nearly 90 against Christians (Ellen Teague, ‘Pakistani intolerance condemned’, The Tablet , 13 August 2005).
De ovenfor nævnte klager bekræftes i en rapport fra menneskerettighedsorganisationen »International Federation for Human Rights« fra januar 2005.
The above complaints are confirmed in a report of January 2005 by the International Federation for Human Rights.
I denne rapport rettes der skarp kritik mod situationen for de religiøse mindretal og lovgivningen vedrørende gudsbespottelse, som betragtes som en overtrædelse af ytrings- og trodsfriheden (International Federation for Human Rights, Freedoms of expression, of association and of assembly in Pakistan, januar 2005, nr. 408/2, s. 57-60).
The report severely criticises the situation facing religious minorities and the law on blasphemy and describes it as a violation of freedom of expression and freedom of religion (International Federation for Human Rights, Freedoms of expression, of association and of assembly in Pakistan, January 2005, No 408/2, pp. 57‑60).
Via hvilke kanaler og hvorledes og hvornår har Rådet opfordret Pakistan til at forbedre situationen for de religiøse mindretal?
Through what channels, how and when has the Council called on Pakistan to improve the position of religious minorities?
Har Rådet overhovedet allerede drøftet lovgivningen om gudsbespottelse i Pakistan?
Has the Council raised the issue of Pakistan's blasphemy legislation at all?
Har Rådet allerede taget skridt til at tilskynde Pakistan til at ratificere de relevante menneskerettighedskonventioner?
Has the Council taken any steps to induce Pakistan to ratify the relevant human rights conventions?
EU er i løbende kontakt med Pakistans myndigheder, enten gennem politiske dialogmøder med ministre og embedsmænd, der er baseret i Europa, eller EU's missionschefers rutinemæssige kontakter i Islamabad.
The EU maintains regular contact with the authorities of Pakistan, be it through political dialogue meetings with ministers and officials based in Europe or routine contacts by EU Heads of Mission in Islamabad.
Det benytter disse kanaler til at give udtryk for EU's bekymringer over den religiøse intolerance i Pakistan og for behovet for fortsatte bestræbelser for at gennemføre regeringens erklæringer om »oplyst moderation«.
It uses these channels to voice EU concerns at religious intolerance in Pakistan as well as the need for continuing efforts to implement government statements on the subject of ‘enlightened moderation’.
Det er fortsat et centralt mål for EU i Pakistan at fremme den religiøse tolerance.
Promoting religious tolerance remains a key EU objective in Pakistan.
Rådet deler bekymringerne over Pakistans lovgivning om gudsbespottelse og den fortsatte misbrug af denne.
The Council shares concerns at the blasphemy legislation of Pakistan and its continuing abuse.
EU har derfor længe opfordret til, at lovgivningen ophæves eller ændres for at hindre misbrug.
The EU has therefore long appealed for its withdrawal or modification to prevent abuse of the legislation.
Der rejses fortsat mange sager i medfør af denne lov, selv om den er blevet ændret for nylig.
A large number of cases continue to be brought under this law, despite its recent modification.
Dette giver anledning til alvorlig bekymring, selv om der ikke er afsagt nogen dom i henhold til loven siden 1979.
This is a matter of serious concern, even if there have been no convictions under the law since 1979.
Konsekvenserne er meget alvorlige for dem, der udsættes for vold som følge af, at den anklagede får utilstrækkelig beskyttelse fra offentlig side.
The consequences are very serious for those who suffer violence resulting from inadequate official protection for the accused.
Chikanerede søgsmål kan også være meget generende.
Malicious litigation can also have considerable nuisance value.
EU fortsætter med at samarbejde med Pakistans regering for indtrængende at opfordre den til at fortsætte arbejdet med at ratificere internationale instrumenter, som sikrer menneskerettigheder, herunder civile, politiske, økonomiske, sociale og kulturelle rettigheder.
The EU continues to work with the government of Pakistan, so as to urge it to continue its work on ratifying international instruments guaranteeing human rights, including civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights.
EU foretager regelmæssigt demarcher over for Pakistan vedrørende menneskerettigheder, senest i december 2005.
The EU issues regular démarches to Pakistan on human rights, most recently in December 2005.
Efter overfaldene på kristne i Sangla Hills, Lahore, mødtes EU's missionschefer i november 2005 i Islamabad med ministeren for religiøse anliggender Ijaz-ul-Haq for meget skarpt at påtale behandlingen af religiøse mindretal
In November 2005 following the violence against Christians in Sangla Hills, Lahore, the EU Heads of Missions in Islamabad met with Ijaz-ul-Haq, the Religious Affairs Minister to raise in the stongest terms the treatment of minorities.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3921/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3921/05
af Ralf Walter (PSE)
by Ralf Walter (PSE)
Om: EU-støtte til Rheinland-Pfalz i årene 2002, 2003 og 2004
Subject: EU aid for Rheinland-Pfalz in the years 2002, 2003 and 2004
I hvilken størrelsesorden og til hvilke foranstaltninger blev der i årene 2002, 2003 og 2004 udbetalt EU-støtte til Rheinland-Pfalz fra henholdsvis: 1.
In the years 2002, 2003 and 2004, how much and for what measures was European Union aid allocated to Rheinland-Pfalz from: 1.
Den Europæiske Fond for Regionaludvikling (EFRU), 2.
The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF ); 2.
Den Europæiske Udviklings- og Garantifond for Landbruget (EUGFL) — Udviklingssektionen, 3.
The European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) — Guidance Section; 3.
Den Europæiske Udviklings- og Garantifond for Landbruget (EUGFL) — Garantisektionen, 4.
The European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) — Guarantee Section; 4.
Den Europæiske Socialfond (ESF), 5.
The European Social Fund (ESF); 5.
Det Europæiske Fællesskabs forskningsrammeprogrammer, 6.
The European Community Research Framework Programmes; 6.
Det Europæiske Fællesskabs programmer på miljøområdet, 7.
European Community programmes in the environment sector; 7.
andre fællesskabsprogrammer?
Other European Community programmes?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3922/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3922/05
(27. oktober 2005)
(27 October 2005)
Om: Kriminalisering af en fredelig protestaktion
Subject: Criminalisation of peaceful protest
Det største problem, der opstår i forbindelse med de stadig strengere straffeforanstaltninger, der træffes som led i kampen mod terrorisme, er at finde en balance mellem dels sikkerheden og opretholdelsen af den offentlige orden og dels beskyttelse og respekt for de politiske friheder.
The most serious question arising in connection with the ever more stringent measures taken as part of the campaign to combat terrorism concerns the balance to be struck between the need for security and public order on the one hand and protection of and respect for political freedoms on the other.
For nogle dage siden blev seks studerende og tidligere studerende fra Lancasters universitet anklaget for at være trængt ind i en forelæsningssal, hvor de i tre minutter uddelte pjecer i protest mod »kommercialiseringen af universitetsforskningen«.
A few days ago, six students and former students of the University of Lancaster were convicted for entering a lecture theatre to stage a three-minute protest during which they handed out leaflets condemning the ‘commercialisation of university research’.
Protestaktionen skete under et arrangement, der drejede sig om samme emne, hvor store multinationale selskaber var repræsenteret, og der blev ikke begået nogen provokerende handlinger.
The protest was relevant (large multinationals were present) and in no way provocative.
Anser Kommissionen det for rimeligt, at de seks studerendes og tidligere studerendes aktion, der var en fredelig protest, betragtes som en kriminel handling på baggrund af nødvendigheden af at tilgodese begge parters rettigheder i lige stort mål?
Does the Commission consider it justified for the action of the six students and former students — amounting to a peaceful protest — to be treated as a criminal offence, even allowing for the need to balance the respective rights of the two parties?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3923/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3923/05
Om: Revisionsrettens bemærkninger til gennemførelsen og kontrollen med udgifterne til landbrug og miljø
Subject: Remarks by the Court of Auditors concerning implementation and verification of agri-environment expenditure
I sin særberetning nr. 3/2005 fastslog Revisionsretten en række svagheder og forsømmelser under gennemførelsen og kontrollen m ed udgifterne til landbrug og miljø i EU-medlemsstaterne.
In its special report No 3/2005, the Court of Auditors identified a series of shortcomings and oversights in the implementation and verification of agri-environment expenditure in the EU Member States.
I lyset af den kommende programmeringsperiode 2007-2013 og den nye forordning om udvikling af landdistrikter anmodes Kommissionen om at besvare følgende: På hvilken måde agter Kommissionen at efterkomme Revisionsrettens henstillinger?
With a view to the forthcoming programming period 2007‑2013 and the new regulation on rural development, how will the Commission take on board the Court of Auditors' recommendations?
Hvordan vil Kommissionen kombinere landbrugs- og miljøprogrammerne med behovet for at opfylde samtlige forpligtelser med henblik på bedre beskyttelse af miljøet og højnelsen af det europæiske landbrugs kvalitet?
In addition, how will it combine the agri-environmental programmes with the need for compliance with all obligations, with a view to ensuring better environmental protection and an improvement in the quality of European agriculture?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3924/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3924/05
Hvordan kan Kommissionen retfærdiggøre, at forhandlingerne med Tyrkiet om landets optagelse i EU fortsætter, når forfatteren Orhan Pamuk samtidig retsforfølges for at have »krænket Tyrkiets nationale værdighed«?
How can the Commission justify continuing negotiations with Turkey for entrance to the EU given the prosecution of the author Orhan Pamuk for ‘insulting Turkey’s national dignity’?
Vil Kommissionen underrette den tyrkiske regering om, at Tyrkiet ikke vil være velkomment i EU, før det har reformeret love af den art, der gør det muligt at knægte ytringsfriheden ved at retsforfølge forfattere?
Will the Commission inform the Turkish Government that it will not be welcome to membership of the EU until it reforms laws like that which enables it to crush free speech by prosecuting authors?
Hvilke skridt har Kommissionen taget over for den tyrkiske regering i sagen om forfatteren Orhan Pamuk?
What representations has the Commission made to the Turkish Government about the author Orhan Pamuk?