natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nogle betydelige resultater af FFC's aktiviteter og handlinger i de seneste to år er følgende:
Some significant results of the JRC activities and actions in last two years are the following:
Efter jordskælvet den 6. april 2009 i Aquila i Abruzzerne i Italien fulgte monitorerings- og informationscentret (MIC) nøje situationen for at bidrage til styringen af krisen.
Following the earthquake of 6 April 2009 near l'Aquila in the Abrusso region of Italy, the EC Monitoring and Information Centre (MIC) closely followed the situation on the ground in an effort to support management of the disaster.
I de første faser blev der brugt kort og situationsrapporter udarbejdet af FFC med henblik på at give en overordnet vurdering af situationen til monitorerings- og informationscentret og til alle civilbeskyttelsesagenturer i Europa.
In the first phases of the event, maps and situation reports produced by the JRC were used in order to give an overall assessment to the MIC and to all civil protection agencies in Europe;
Efter naturkatastroferne, der ramte Asien og Stillehavsområdet i september og oktober 2009, hjalp FFC monitorerings- og informationscentret med at koordinere EU's indsats.
in the aftermath of natural disasters that struck the Asia-Pacific region in September and October 2009, the JRC supported the EC's Monitoring and Information Centre (MIC) in coordinating a response from the EU.
Det globale katastrofevarslingssystem og koordineringssystem bidrog til håndteringen af tsunamien på Samoa, jordskælvet i Indonesien og de tropiske cykloner på Filippinerne.
The Global Disaster Alert and Coordination System supported responses to the tsunami in Samoa, the earthquake in Indonesia and the tropical cyclones in the Philippines.
Nuklear sikkerhedskontrol og ikke-spredning
Nuclear safety and non-proliferation
FFC vil i april åbne et europæisk clearinginstitut for nukleare operatørers operationelle erfaringer (European Clearing House for Operational Experience of Nuclear Operator), der vil bidrage til udveksling af bedste praksis og fremme af nuklear sikkerhed.
JRC will inaugurate in April the ‘European Clearing House for Operational Experience of Nuclear Operators’, contributing to exchange of best practices and promoting nuclear safety;
FFC bidrager til den nukleare sikkerhed ved at analysere prøver fundet i forbindelse med IAEA's kontroller eller tilfældigt i medlemsstaterne.
JRC supports nuclear security by analyzing samples found during nuclear inspections of the IAEA or accidentally in Member States.
I 2009 blev to fund af skrot af rustfrit stål i Rotterdam i Nederlandene analyseret af FFC.
In 2009, two finds of contaminated stainless steel scrap objects found in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, were analyzed by the JRC;
FFC bidrager til regnskaberne med nukleart materiale (og sikrer derved, at intet nukleart materiale spredes fra civile anlæg) ved at drive laboratorier på selve anlægget i nukleare oparbejdningsanlæg i Sellafield og Haag, og FFC oprettede i 2009 et nukleart regnskabssystem i det russiske oparbejdningsanlæg i Majak (FFC‑ITU).
The JRC contributes to nuclear accountancy (making sure that no nuclear materials are diverted from civilian facilities) by running on-site laboratories in nuclear re-processing plants in Sellafield and La Hague and installed in 2009 a nuclear accountancy system in a Russian reprocessing plant (Majak) (JRC-ITU).
Aktiviteter i forbindelse med SETIS (den strategiske energiteknologiplans informationssystem), hvor FFC i samarbejde med alle relevante interessenter vurderede det finansielle hul, der skal lukkes for at bringe de i SET‑planen prioriterede teknologier med lav CO 2 ‑udledning på markedet senest 2020 (JRC‑IE).
SETIS (Strategic Energy Technology Information System) activities, where the JRC, in collaboration with all relevant stakeholders, estimated the financial gap which needs to be bridged in order to bring the SET-Plan prioritised low carbon energy technologies to market by 2020 (JRC-IE).
FFC har også bidraget til den strategiske energiteknologiplan med en oversigt over EU's beføjelser, hvad angår energiteknologi, og en køreplan for energiteknologi.
the JRC also contributed to the SET-plan a map of EU competences in energy technologies and a road map for energy technologies.
SET‑planen blev positivt modtaget af Europa-Parlamentet den 11. marts 2010.
The SET-plan was welcomed by the EP in a resolution of 11 March 2010.
Den offentlige sikkerhed
Public Security
Nye metoder til måling af elektromagnetiske forstyrrelser (EMI) fra elektroniske kort, som blev udviklet i 2009 på grundlag af et højtopløsende datafangstsystem og specifikke analyseprogrammer (JRC‑IPSC).
New method for measuring Electromagnetic Disturbance (EMD) emitted by electronic cards; in 2009, based on the use of a high resolution data acquisition system and dedicated analysis software (JRC-IPSC)
Det fælles referencelaboratorium for genetisk modificerede fødevarer udarbejdede i 2009 11 metoder til validering af metoder til detektion af OMG'er (JRC‑IHCP).
the JRC Community Reference Laboratory for Genetically Modified Food and Feed delivered 11 validated methods for GMO detection over the course of 2009 (JRC-IHCP)
Der er blevet offentliggjort meget nyt referencemateriale i 2009, f.eks. referencemateriale for C‑reaktive proteiner, der er meget følsomme markører af betændelse og vævsskader, og nyt referencemateriale for OMG‑matrixer (JRC‑IRMM).
several new reference materials released in 2009; eg reference material for C-Reactive Protein, which is a very sensitive marker of inflammation and tissue damage and new GMO matrix reference materials (JRC-IRMM)
FFC offentliggjorde i 2009 rapporten »The Impact of Social Computing (web 2.0) on the EU Information Society and Economy«, der samler resultaterne fra forskning i flere sektorer og fremhæver den stærke vækst i netværkscomputing, og det supplerende værk »»Public services 2.0: The impact of Social Computing on Public Services« (JRC‑IPTS).
the JRC published, in 2009, the report ‘The Impact of Social Computing (web 2.0) on the EU Information Society and Economy’ that brings together multi-sector research findings and highlights the rapid growth of social computing and the complementary work ‘Public services 2.0: The impact of Social Computing on Public Services’ (JRC-IPTS)
For at uddybe svaret:
To further reply to the question:
Instituttet for Teknologiske Fremtidsstudier (IPTS) er en af FFC's syv institutioner.
The Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) is one of the seven institutes of the JRC.
Bidraget fra IPTS dækker støtte af strategisk betydning for EU som forskning og innovation, digital agenda, bæredygtig produktion og forbrug, energieffektivitet, transport og klimaforandringer og landbrug og udvikling af landdistrikter.
The IPTS support covers Policies of strategic importance to the European Union such as Research and Innovation, Digital Agenda, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Economics of Energy, Transport and Climate Change and Agriculture and Rural Development.
For alle FFC's institutter gælder, at deres resultater evalueres grundigt og systematisk, og kundetilfredsheden måles.
As it is the case for all JRC scientific institutes, the institute's output is systematically and thoroughly evaluated and customer satisfaction is assessed.
På baggrund af resultaterne af disse evalueringer er Kommissionen overbevist om, at FFC's Institut for Teknologiske Fremtidsstudier yder fremragende resultater for de midler, det modtager.
On the basis of the results of these evaluations the Commission is satisfied that the JRC's Institute for Prospective Technological Studies provides excellent value for money.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1366/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1366/10
Om: Det Fælles Forskningscenter i Ispra og dets opnåede resultater
Subject: Joint Research Centre in Ispra and results achieved
Det Fælles Forskningscenter (FFC) modtager årligt et ikke ubetydeligt tilskud af EU‑midler til forskning.
The Joint Research Centre (JRC) receives a significant amount of EU research funding every year.
Efter forlydender modtager alene Ispra-afdelingen (med sine 2 700 medarbejdere) årligt ca. 300 mio. EUR.
It is reported that the Ispra section alone (with its 2700 staff) receives around EUR 300 million a year.
Hidtil har det været svært at få øje på resultater, der retfærdiggør denne budgetpost i EU's finanser.
Up until now it has been hard to see any results that justify this budget line in the EU's finances.
Derfor bedes Kommissionen redegøre for, hvilke nævneværdige resultater FFC har opnået inden for de sidste par år, og hvorvidt Kommissionen vurderer, at disse resultater står mål med de midler, som FFC årligt modtager?
Can the Commission therefore explain what significant results the JRC has achieved in the last few years and to what extent the Commission considers that these results are commensurate with the funding received by the JRC each year?
Kommissionen bedes i den forbindelse oplyse det eksakte budget for FFC.
In this context, can the Commission provide information on the exact budget for the JRC?
Endvidere bedes Kommissionen oplyse, om centrets politik vedrørende 5‑års rammeprogrammer er blevet taget op til revision for nyligt, da det for udenforstående virker som en arbitrær indskrænkning, som ofte virker som en forhindring i forhold til at opnå et frugtbart resultat.
Can the Commission also state whether there has been a recent review of the centre's policy with regard to the 5-year Framework Programmes, which appears to outsiders to be an arbitrary restriction that is often an impediment to achieving fruitful results.
Kunne det tænkes, at det ville være mere økonomisk ansvarligt, såfremt FFC blev nedlagt og i stedet omdannet til et donorkontor, hvorfra der kunne uddeles midler til projekter rundt omkring i EU, som kunne synes egnede til yderligere forskning?
Would it conceivably be more economically responsible to close down the JRC and convert it into a donor agency that could distribute funds to projects throughout the EU that were considered appropriate for further research activity?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1367/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1367/10
Om: Hvorvidt EU ligestiller forskellige former for fremmedhad
Subject: How the EU equates various types of xenophobia
Det glæder mig overordentligt, at Kommissionen fordømmer og forkaster enhver form for racisme, fremmedhad og antisemitisme (E‑6083/09), og at Kommissionen arbejder for en bedre forståelse og tolerance på tværs af kulturer.
I am delighted that the Commission condemns and rejects all manifestations of racism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism (E‑6083/09), and that the Commission is working to promote better intercultural understanding and tolerance.
Desværre fremgår det ikke tilstrækkeligt tydeligt af Kommissionens svar, om den anskuer antisemitismen som et særskilt fænomen, som desværre i udpræget grad karakteriserer visse dele af de til Europa indvandrede muslimer, og som dermed er blevet importeret til Europa fra blandt andet Mellemøsten, eller om Kommissionen ligestiller antisemitismen med den i visse tilfælde berettigede kritik fra europæiske borgeres side af de seneste årtiers masseindvandring til Europa.
Unfortunately, it is not sufficiently clear from the Commission's answer whether it considers anti-Semitism to be a specific phenomenon that is unfortunately particularly characteristic of certain sections of Europe's immigrant Muslim population, and which has thus been imported into Europe from areas such as the Middle East, or whether the Commission equates anti-Semitism with the sometimes justified criticisms voiced by European citizens regarding the mass immigration into Europe in recent decades.
Kommissionen skal i den forbindelse erindres om, at resultaterne i en rapport om antisemitisme i 2003 fra Det Europæiske Observationscenter for Racisme og Fremmedhad (EUMC) blev mørklagt af ledelsen under Beate Winckler, fordi de viste, at muslimer stod for en stor del af de antisemitisk motiverede overgreb, og dermed ikke stemte overens med EUMC's billede af virkeligheden, og at budgettet for samme EUMC (nu Agenturet for Grundlæggende Rettigheder — FRA) forventes at stige til langt over 200 mio. kroner i 2013.
In this context, the Commission should be reminded that the results of a 2003 report on anti-Semitism by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) were hushed up under the guidance of Beate Winckler, because they showed that many of the attacks motivated by anti-Semitism were perpetrated by Muslims and thus did not correspond with the EUMC's vision of reality, and that the budget for this same body (now called the Agency for Fundamental Rights) is expected to be well in excess of DKK 200 million in 2013.
Set i lyset af holocaust som en unik historisk tragedie i Europa forekommer det spørgeren særdeles overfladisk, at Kommissionen vælger at blande forskellige former for fremmedhad sammen, hvilket meget nemt kan blive opfattet som en relativering af forbrydelsen mod jøderne under Anden Verdenskrig.
Viewed against the background of the Holocaust as a uniquely tragic episode in European history, it seems extremely superficial of the Commission to choose to put all types of xenophobia in the same pot, which could quite easily be construed as an attempt to relativise the crimes committed against the Jews during the Second World War.
Vil Kommissionen derfor oplyse, om den anskuer antisemitismen som noget særligt i relation til andre former for intolerance og fremmedhad, og om den vurderer, at der skal gøres en særlig indsats for at bekæmpe antisemitisme, herunder om Kommissionen er opmærksom på den kendsgerning, at én minoritet — nemlig fundamentalistiske muslimer — kan udgøre den væsentligste trussel mod en anden minoritet — jøder?
Can the Commission therefore state whether it considers anti-Semitism to be distinct from other forms of intolerance and xenophobia, if it thinks that special efforts should be made to combat anti-Semitism, and, in this respect, if it is aware of the fact that one minority — namely Muslim fundamentalists — may represent the main threat to another — the Jews?
(12. april 2010)
(12 April 2010)
Unionen skal ifølge traktaterne bekæmpe forskellige former for intolerance såsom intolerance på grund af en persons race, etniske oprindelse eller religion.
The Treaties require the Union to combat different forms of intolerance, such as intolerance based on a person's racial and ethnic origin or religion.
Kommissionen udnytter sine beføjelser i henhold til traktaterne fuldt ud for at bekæmpe ethvert udryk for en sådan intolerance.
The Commission makes full use of the powers conferred by the Treaties to fight all manifestations of such intolerance.
Unionen har indtil videre vedtaget lovgivning (direktiver om ligebehandling, rammeafgørelse om bekæmpelse af racisme og fremmedhad Rådets rammeafgørelse 2008/913/RIA af 28. november 2008 om bekæmpelse af visse former for og tilkendegivelser af racisme og fremmedhad ved hjælp af straffelovgivningen, EUT L 328 af 6.12.2008. , direktivet om audiovisuelle medietjenester Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv 2007/65/EF af 11. december 2007 om ændring af Rådets direktiv 89/552/EØF om samordning af visse love og administrative bestemmelser i medlemsstaterne vedrørende udøvelse af tv-spredningsvirksomhed, EUT L 332 af 18.12.2007. ), etableret finansielle programmer og gennemført oplysningsaktiviteter til bekæmpelse af racisme, fremmedhad og antisemitisme.
The Union has so far adopted legislation (anti-discrimination directives, Framework Decision on combating Racism and Xenophobia Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law, OJ L 328, 6.12.2008. , the Audiovisual Media Services Directive Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, OJ L 332, 18.12.2007. ), set up financial programmes and undertaken awareness raising activities to fight racism, xenophobia and anti-semitism.
Denne tilgang tager højde for, at visse former og udtryk for intolerance, såsom racisme, fremmedhad og antisemitisme, har hver deres egne særlige kendetegn og problemer, der skal takles.
This approach acknowledges that different forms and manifestations of intolerance, such as racism, xenophobia and antisemitism, have their own distinct features and problems that need to be addressed.
Kommissionen vil fortsat bekæmpe antisemitisme, i det omfang dens beføjelser tillader det, ved at gøre brug af de midler, den har til rådighed.
The Commission will continue to fight anti-semitism in line with its powers, by making use of the instruments at its disposal.
Kommissionen vil også fortsat støtte Agenturet for Grundlæggende Rettigheders indsats for at indsamle data om antisemitisme.
The Commission will also continue to support the efforts of the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights to collect data on anti-semitism.
På baggrund af de data, som agenturet allerede har indsamlet fra forskellige kilder, kan det konkluderes, at konflikten i Mellemøsten påvirker antallet af antisemitiske hændelser i EU.
On the basis of the data already compiled by the Agency from different sources, it can be concluded that the Middle East conflict has an impact on the level of anti-Semitic incidents in the EU.
Samtidig er det ikke muligt at beskrive antisemitisme som et fænomen, der »i udpræget grad karakteriserer« bestemte samfund eller grupper, da det udspringer forskellige steder, herunder f.eks. i højreekstremistiske grupper og blandt nynazister.
At the same time, it is not possible to describe anti-semitism as a phenomenon ‘particularly characteristic’ of any community or group as it has various sources including, for example, far right groups and neo-nazis.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1368/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1368/10
Om: Gennemførelse af undersøgelse af, i hvor høj grad også andre medlemsstater har gjort brug af one-off market swap operations
Subject: Enquiry into whether other Member States have made use of one-off market swap operations
I en orienterende note fra Eurostat om græsk økonomi og særligt om Grækenlands transaktioner i perioden 2000‑2001, der blev offentliggjort i dag, står der, at der ikke fandtes specifikke statistiske regler om one‑off market swap operations, da det europæiske nationalregnskabssystem (ESA, European System of Accounts) blev vedtaget i 1995.
A Eurostat information note published today concerning the Greek economy, and more specifically transactions by Greece during the period 2000‑01, points out that, when the European system of accounts (ESA) was set up in1995, there were no specific statistical rules governing one-off market swap operations.
I noten står der desuden, at efter anmodning fra Eurostat til de græske myndigheder oplyste sidstnævnte for første gang den 23. februar, at der faktisk eksisterede sådanne transaktioner i perioden 2000‑2001.
The note also points out that, when questioned by Eurostat, the Greek authorities indicated for the first time on 23 February that operations of this kind had indeed been conducted during 2000‑01.
Der står endvidere, at Eurostat i samarbejde med de græske myndigheder skal fastsætte, hvor meget den græske statsgæld stiger på grund af denne specifikke transaktion.
It adds that Eurostat will determine, in cooperation with the Greek Government, to what extent these operations increased the public debt.
Eftersom der i Eurostats note står, at dette ikke var almindelig praksis for medlemsstaternes regeringer, uden dog at præcisere dette udsagn nærmere, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende: 1.
Given that, as the Eurostat note asserts — although it gives no source for the information — these practices were not current among Member State governments, will the Commission answer the following: 1.
Findes der andre medlemsstater, der i samme tidsrum tyede til samme praksis (one-off market swap operation)? 2.
Did other Member States engage in the same practices (one-off market swap operations) during the same period? 2.
Agter Kommissionen at iværksætte tilsvarende undersøgelser over for de andre medlemsstater, så oplysningerne om deres statsgæld dernæst kan blive tilpasset og udformet på tilsvarende måde, såfremt de har anvendt sådanne eller tilsvarende praksisser?
Will it carry out similar inquiries regarding other Member States to ensure that, if they did engage in these or similar practices, they adjust and revise the data relating to their public debt?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1369/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1369/10
Pakistan fungerer fortsat som tilflugtssted for kendte ledere af Khalistan-terroristgrupper, herunder den frygtede Babbar Khalsa-gruppe.
Pakistan continues to provide sanctuary to known leaders of Khalistani terrorist groups, including the dreaded Babbar Khalsa group.
Babbar Khalsa er en sikhbevægelse, der har til formål at oprette et uafhængigt Khalistan i Punjabregionen i Indien, og som har været opført som en terrorgruppe i Det Forenede Kongerige siden 2001.
Babbar Khalsa is a Sikh movement that aims to establish an independent Khalistan within the Punjab region of India, and has been listed since 2001 by the UK as a terrorist group.
Beviset for dette blev offentliggjort på det britiske indenrigsministeriums hjemmeside om sikkerhed (http://security.homeoffice.gov.uk/legislation/current-legislation/terrorism-act-2000/proscribed-groups.html), Oxford Analytica (tirsdag den 3. november 2009, PAKISTAN: »Sectarianism underpins rising terror threat«, http://www.oxan.com/display.aspx?ItemID=DB155341) og Terrorism Monitor (7. bind, udgave 1, 9. januar 2009, s. 1-4: »India’s Sikh Militants Forming Ties with Lashkar-e-Taiba and Pakistani Intelligence«, http://www.jamestown.org/fileadmin/JamestownContent/Book_Images/TM_007_1.pdf, Mukhtar A. Khan)
Proof of this was published by the UK Home Office security website (http://security.homeoffice.gov.uk/legislation/current-legislation/terrorism-act-2000/proscribed-groups.html), Oxford Analytica (Tuesday, 3 November 2009 PAKISTAN: Sectarianism underpins rising terror threat, http://www.oxan.com/display.aspx?ItemID=DB155341) and the Terrorism Monitor (Volume: 7 Issue: 1, January 9, 2009, pp. 1-4: India’s Sikh Militants Forming Ties with Lashkar-e-Taiba and Pakistani Intelligence, http://www.jamestown.org/fileadmin/JamestownContent/Book_Images/TM_007_1.pdf, Mukhtar A. Khan)
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Rådet truffet for at sikre, at medlemsstaterne træffer effektive foranstaltninger over for Pakistan med henblik på at retsforfølge disse terroristledere og udlevere dem som en del af sin forpligtelse i forbindelse med den globale kamp mod terror?
What actions has the Council undertaken to ensure that Member States take effective action towards Pakistan in order to bring these terrorist leaders to justice and extradite them as part of its commitment to the global struggle against terror?
(2. juni 2010)
(2 June 2010)
Siden 2. maj 2002 har Babbar Khalsa været på EU's liste over de personer, grupper og enheder, som er omfattet af specifikke foranstaltninger til bekæmpelse af terrorisme i henhold til Rådets fælles holdning 2001/931/FUSP EFT L 344 af 28.12.2001, s. 93 . og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 2580/2001 EFT L 344 af 28.12.2001, s. 70 . .
Since 2 May 2002 Babbar Khalsa has been on the EU list of persons, groups and entities subject to specific measures to combat terrorism, pursuant to Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, pp. 93. and Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, pp. 70. .
Denne liste er senest blevet ajourført den 22. december 2009 (jf. Rådets afgørelse 2009/1004/FUSP og Rådets gennemførelsesforordning (EU) nr. 1285/2009 EUT L 346 af 23.12.2009, henholdsvis s. 58 og s. 39. ).
This list was last updated on 22 December 2009 (see Council Decision 2009/1004/CFSP and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1285/2009 OJ L 346, 23.12.2009, pp. 58 and 39 respectively. ).