natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Er der planer om at revidere EU's dyrevelfærdsbestemmelser i forbindelse med dyretransporter inden for en overskuelig fremtid for at lukke denne og/eller eventuelle andre endnu eksisterende bagdøre?
Are there plans to revise EU animal protection rules governing shipments of animals in the foreseeable future in order to close this and any other similar loopholes?
Findes der i mellemtiden andre muligheder for at sætte en stopper for denne praksis?
In the meantime, are there any other ways of halting this unacceptable practice?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3788/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3788/09
Om: Skyttedemonstration i Sydtyrol
Subject: Demonstration by ‘Schützen’ (members of a traditional militia) in South Tyrol
Demonstrationer og marcher er udtryk for et selvbevidst folk og for traditioner og skikke, som får stadig større betydning i et Europa, der bliver stadig mere grænseløst.
Rallies and marches are the expression of the self-confidence of a people and of the traditions and customs which are taking on ever greater importance in a Europe in which borders are gradually disappearing.
Hertil hører bl.a. også, at man optræder i nationaldragt til festligheder og processioner, og hertil hører også Tyrols skytter, hvis rødder går helt tilbage til middelalderen.
These traditions and customs include the wearing of local costume during celebrations and processions and they also include the ‘Schützen’ in South Tyrol, whose roots can be traced back to the Middle Ages.
Gang på gang har skytterne tidligere bevist deres kampkraft, deres mod, deres kærlighed til hjemstavnen og deres træfsikkerhed.
In the past the ‘Schützen’ have repeatedly demonstrated their fighting abilities, their courage, their love of their homeland and their marksmanship.
I slutningen af april 2009 forbød man imidlertid de sydtyrolske skytters fredelige protestmarch til mindesmærket for fascismen, mens de italienske »alpini« på samme tidspunkt fik tilladelse til det samme, men med henblik på fejring.
However, in late April 2009 the ‘Schützen’ in South Tyrol were banned from conducting a peaceful protest march to a local Fascist memorial, even though the ‘Alpini’ (Italian alpine troops) were allowed to organise a similar celebration at the same time.
En fredelig protest mod fascistiske mindesmærker blev forbudt og sågar sammenlignet med terrorisme.
A peaceful protest against Fascist memorials was prohibited and even compared with terrorism.
Den italienske udenrigsminister Frattini gik endda så vidt som til at kræve, at de sydtyrolske skytter skulle fratages deres geværer.
The Italian Foreign Minister, Mr Frattini, went as far as to call for the ‘Schützen’ in South Tyrol to have their rifles confiscated.
Det har skabt uro, og klimaet mellem befolkningsgrupperne i Sydtyrol risikerer at blive stadig dårligere.
This provoked heated reactions and there is a danger that relations between the ethnic groups in South Tyrol will deteriorate even further.
Som borger får man det indtryk, at man her endnu en gang opererer med dobbelte standarder, frit efter devisen: Nationalsocialister og deres terrorregimer er onde, især når de marcherer ind i et andet land, og det hører med til god tone at besøge KZ-mindesmærker.
The public has the impression that double standards are being employed once again: the National Socialists and their terror regime are evil, particularly when they invade another country, and it is good form to visit concentration camp memorials.
Dette gælder tilsyneladende ikke, når der er tale om italienske fascister.
The same would not appear to apply when Italian Fascists are involved.
Hvordan forholder EU sig til beskyttelsen af menneskerettighederne, navnlig forsamlingsfriheden, lighedsprincippet og mindretalsrettighederne i det foreliggende tilfælde?
What is the EU’s standpoint on the safeguarding of human rights, in particular freedom of association, the principle of equal treatment and minority rights, in connection with the case outlined above?
Hvad har man i denne forbindelse planlagt at gøre fra Kommissionens side for at respektere de højt besungne europæiske værdier?
In that connection, what steps is the Commission planning to take in order to safeguard our much lauded European values?
I hvilket omfang diskuteres det i EU også at tage andre rædselsregimers fortid under behandling og f.eks. nyfortolke fascistiske relikter respektive sætte dem på museum og/eller lave dem om til mindesmærker i lighed med KZ-mindesmærkerne?
Is any form of debate being conducted in the EU on how we can come to terms with the history of other terror regimes, such as the Fascists, and, for example, rethink our attitudes to Fascist relics or house them in museums and/or transform them into memorials similar to concentration camp memorials?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3789/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3789/09
Om: Familiesammenføring/nyt asyldirektiv
Subject: Family reunification/new asylum directive
I dag omfatter begrebet »familiemedlemmer« ægtefæller, ugifte partnere, hvis der er tale om et permanent forhold, samt mindreårige, ugifte børn.
The concept of ‘family member’ currently covers spouses, stable non-married partners and unmarried children who are minors.
Dette skal nu ændres, idet mindreårige børn skal være omdrejningspunktet.
Now, however, the focus is set to shift to children who are minors.
Nu er det jo planen, at begrebet »familiemedlemmer« også skal udvides til at omfatte en mindreårig asylansøgers forældre eller værger samt mindreårige børn, hvis samlivet tjener deres »vel«.
The plan is that the concept of ‘family member’ should be expanded to include the parents or guardians of asylum‑seekers who are minors and any of their siblings who are minors if family reunification is seen as vital to their ‘well-being’.
Hvis der sker en udvidelse af familiemedlemsbegrebet, må man sandsynligvis forvente en voldsom stigning i antallet af asylansøgninger fra mindreårige.
It is likely that any broadening of the concept of ‘family member’ would lead to a dramatic increase in the number of asylum applications from minors.
Nigerias eksempel viser, hvilken demografisk sprængkraft det udvidede familiemedlemsbegreb indebærer: Af de skønsmæssigt 150 mio. indbyggere er 42 % under 15 år
The potential impact of this demographic time bomb can be illustrated by taking the example of Nigeria: 42 % of its estimated population of 150 million are below the age of 15.
Børn helt ned til ni år forsøger at snige sig om bord på skibe, gemmer sig under lastvogne og mobile homes eller stikker af i små både.
Children as young as nine are stowing away on ships, hiding under lorries and mobile homes or setting sail in small boats.
Resultatet er, at der i dag alene i Spanien lever op til 7 000 flygtningebørn uden familie.
The result is that in Spain alone up to 7000 child refugees are living without their families.
Hvis de bliver opdaget og sendt hjem, før de ankommer, forsøger en stor del af dem igen og igen med livet som indsats.
If they are picked up before they arrive and sent home, many of them repeatedly try again, placing their own lives.
Hvilke konsekvenser forudser Kommissionen i denne forbindelse som følge af en omdefinering af begrebet »familiemedlemmer«?
What impact does the Commission expect a redefinition of the term ‘family member’ to have on the phenomenon of child refugees?
Hvor mange flygtningebørn skønner man, at der i dag opholder sig illegalt i EU's medlemsstater, og hvilke ændringer forventer man i lyset af det nye asyldirektiv?
According to estimates, how many child refugees are currently illegally present in the EU Member States and what impact is the new asylum directive expected to have on this situation?
Hvor store er de skønnede økonomiske konsekvenser af et udvidet familiemedlemsbegreb i henhold til det nye asyldirektiv?
What are the estimated financial implications of broadening the definition of ‘family member’ as proposed in the new asylum directive?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3790/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3790/09
Om: Omkostninger til asylansøgere / nyt asyldirektiv
Subject: Costs generated by asylum‑seekers/new asylum directive
Længe har det heddet sig, at vi behøvede indvandrere, dels for at modvirke den demografiske udvikling, dels for fortsat at kunne finansiere staten og de sociale systemer.
For a long time the accepted view was that the State and/or social security systems needed immigrants in order to cope with the impact of demographic trends and remain solvent.
Ifølge en undersøgelse foretaget af det tyske Ifo Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung modtager indvandrere, som har boet under 10 år i Tyskland, hvert år i gennemsnit 2 400 euro mere fra staten, end de yder i form af skatter og afgifter.
According to a study carried out by the Ifo Institute for Economic Research, in Germany immigrants who have been in the country for less than 10 years receive on average EUR 2 400 per year more from the State than they pay in contributions and taxes.
Hvor høje er de aktuelle omkostninger til forsørgelse af asylansøgere i EU‑landene?
What is the current cost of welfare provision for asylum‑seekers in the Member States?
Findes der opgørelser over, hvor meget medlemslandene betaler til asylansøgere i form af grundbeløb, lægebehandling, social bistand osv.?
Are breakdowns available of how much Member States spend on basic welfare provision, medical care, social assistance, etc. for asylum‑seekers?
Hvilke beregninger er der foretaget over de forventede økonomiske belastninger for EU‑landene i forbindelse med det nye asyldirektiv?
Have calculations been drawn up of the likely cost to the Member Staes of the new asylum directive?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3791/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3791/09
af Norbert Glante (S-D)
by Norbert Glante (S-D)
Om: Bedømmelse af COST-ansøgninger
Subject: Assessment of COST applications
Forskere har gentagne gange gjort mig opmærksom på et problem i forbindelse med bedømmelsessystemet for projektansøgninger hos COST (European Coordination in Science and Technology).
Scientists have repeatedly drawn my attention to a problem relating to the procedures for assessing COST (European Coordination in Science and Technology) project applications.
Det er således forekommet, at projekter er blevet afvist, fordi ansøgningen ikke var blevet bedømt af alle de nødvendige seks bedømmere, selv om ansøgerne havde indsendt ansøgningerne i overensstemmelse med reglerne.
In the past projects have been rejected because they have not been assessed by the required number of experts (six), even though the applications had been submitted in due form.
Fordi den sjette bedømmelse manglede, har man således også afvist projekter, som i de øvrige fem indleverede bedømmelser havde opnået de bedste resultater og dermed var egnede til støtte.
Because of the missing sixth assessment, projects have been rejected even though they had achieved outstanding results in the five assessments submitted, indicating that they were worthy of support.
Man klager også over, at bedømmelsesudvalget, som består af uafhængige forskere, ikke altid kan træffe uafhængige og saglige afgørelser, fordi der i nogle tilfælde har været fastlagt prioriteringer for projekter, som under alle omstændigheder skulle tildeles støttemidler.
There are also criticisms that the assessment panel, which comprises independent academics, cannot always take impartial, objective decisions because some priorities stipulating which types of project should definitely receive support have been laid down in advance.
Hvordan forholder Kommissionen sig til de beskrevne misforhold, og hvad vil den gøre for at afhjælpe dem?
What view does the Commission take of the problems outlined above and what steps is it taking to remedy them?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3792/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3792/09
af Herbert Reul (PPE)
by Herbert Reul (PPE)
En enhedsskole i kommunen Reichshof/Eckenhagen har planer om at omlægge skolegården.
A comprehensive school in the municipality of Reichshof/Eckenhagen is planning to redesign its schoolyard.
Er det muligt, at skolen, som ligger i regionen Köln i Nordrhein‑Westfalen, kan søge om EU‑støtte til et sådant projekt?
Can this school in the district of Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, apply for EU funding for this project?
Hvis ja, kan De så venligst oplyse mig om, hvor skolen kan henvende sig vedrørende rådgivning og ansøgning?
If so, which body should the school contact in order to seek advice and submit an application?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3793/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3793/09
af Markus Ferber (PPE)
by Markus Ferber (PPE)
Om: Standardisering af specifikationen Common Interface Plus (CI+)
Subject: Standardisation of the CI Plus Specification
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at en eventuel europæisk standardisering af CI+, f.eks. i Det Europæiske Institut for Telestandarder (ETSI), kan få negative følger for forbrugerne og for små og mellemstore producenter? 2.
Is the Commission aware of any problems which the possible European standardisation of the CI Plus Specification, e.g. by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), would create for consumers and small and medium-sized manufacturers?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at specifikationen CI+, som er indbyrdes aftalt mellem virksomhederne i organisationen CI Plus LLP, vil medføre en begrænsning af fremstilling og salg af tv‑apparater og hæmme den tekniske udvikling af digitaliseringen af tv‑markedet til skade for forbrugerne og de mindre og mellemstore producenter? 4.
Does the Commission regard the introduction of the agreed CI Plus Specification by the undertakings concerned and/or the organisation CI Plus LLP as an obstacle to the manufacture and marketing of consumer electronics or to the further digitalisation of the television market, to the detriment of consumers and small and medium-sized manufacturers?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at de involverede virksomheders specifikation indebærer en risiko for opsplitning af det indre marked, og at små og mellemstore producenter af digitale set top bokse/CI 1.0 moduler i lavprissegmentet tilsigtet/reelt fortrænges fra markedet?
Does the Commission see the introduction of the new specification by the undertakings concerned as creating a risk of market segregation in the internal market, with the result, intended or otherwise, that small and medium-sized manufacturers of digital set-top boxes/CI 1.0 modules will be driven out of the low-cost segment of the market?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3794/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3794/09
af Ingeborg Gräßle (PPE)
by Ingeborg Gräßle (PPE)
Om: Bygningsmæssige mangler ved Kommissionens bygninger
Subject: Construction faults in Commission buildings
Madou-Bygningen har haft bygningsmæssige mangler, som har ført til delvis sammenstyrtning af et loft.
Construction faults in the Madou Building led to the partial collapse of a ceiling.
Hvilke skader har Kommissionen konstateret i denne bygning?
What forms of damage to this building has the Commission identified?
Hvilke foranstaltninger er nødvendige for at udbedre manglerne, og hvor meget mener Kommissionen, det vil koste?
What repairs are needed, and what is the cost likely to be?
Er det ikke standard at bruge brandsikre materialer i Kommissionens bygninger?
Is the use of non-flammable materials not standard in Commission buildings?
Hvilke andre bygnings‑ og materialemæssige mangler har Kommissionen konstateret i Berlaymont-Bygningen?
What other construction and materials-related faults has the Commission identified in the Berlaymont Building?
Hvilke materialekontroller er der foretaget ved renoveringen af Berlaymont-Bygningen?
What checks on materials were carried out during the renovation of the Berlaymont Building?
Hvordan forholder Kommissionen sig til de materialemæssige mangler?
What is the Commission's standpoint on the materials-related faults?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3795/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3795/09
Om: Håndtering af korruption i OIB — opfølgning på E-3721/07
Subject: Dealing with corruption in the Office for Infrastructure and Logistics — Brussels (OIB) — Follow‑up to Written Question E‑3721/07
I Kontoret for Infrastruktur og Logistik i Bruxelles (OIB) er der konstateret flere tilfælde af korruption.
A number of cases of corruption have been brought to light in the OIB.
Hvor mange af disse tilfælde behandles i øjeblikket af OLAF, og hvor mange af det belgiske retsvæsen?
How many cases are currently being investigated by OLAF, and how many by the Belgian judicial authorities?
Hvis ja, til hvilket resultat?
Written Question E‑2199/04)) already produced results, and if so, what results?
Hvilke interne (f.eks. disciplinære) foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet?
What internal (e.g. disciplinary) measures has the Commission taken in response?
Der har været rygter om, at medarbejdere ved OIB har været inviteret til formel 1‑løb i Spa.
In my Written Question E‑3721/07 I raised the issue of rumours concerning OIB staff being invited to Formula 1 races in Spa.
I sit svar på E‑3721/07 anførte Kommissionen, at »Kommissionen for tiden bestræber sig på at afklare disse rygter og også eventuelle begunstigelser tilbudt af andre firmaer«.
In its answer the Commission stated that it ‘is currently seeking to clarify these rumours as well as the question of favours that may have been offered by other companies’.
Har Kommissionen siden da fået afklaret disse rygter?
Has the Commission since clarified the rumours?
Hvilket resultat er Kommissionen kommet frem til?
What was the outcome of the Commission's investigations?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3796/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3796/09
af Angelika Niebler (PPE)
by Angelika Niebler (PPE)
Om: Rumænske børnehjemsbørn
Subject: Children in Romanian orphanages
Siden Rumænien blev medlem af EU, er stadig flere rumænere flygtet fra arbejdsløsheden og fattigdommen i deres land for at arbejde i andre europæiske lande.
Since Romania joined the European Union, more and more Romanians have been seeking to escape unemployment and poverty in their own country by working in other parts of Europe.
Fjernsynet melder om, at mange af dem efterlader deres børn i børnehjem i Rumænien.
According to television reports, many of them leave their children in orphanages in Romania.
Ifølge officielle tal drejer det sig om ca. 100 000 børn og unge, som vokser op uden deres forældre, fordi disse arbejder i andre EU‑lande.
Official figures suggest that some 100000 children and young people are growing up without parents because the latter are working in other parts of Europe.
Hvad kan Kommissionen gøre for at afhjælpe denne situation, som er lige utålelig for både børnene og deres forældre?
What steps can the Commission take to deal with a situation which is equally intolerable for both the children and their parents?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3797/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3797/09
af Renate Sommer (PPE)
by Renate Sommer (PPE)
På nuværende tidspunkt må syntetisk ethylalkohol ikke sælges til den tyske kosmetik- og kropsplejeindustri i seks måneder om året.
At present, for six months a year, synthetic ethyl alcohol cannot be sold to the German cosmetics and personal hygiene industry.
Denne situation synes uforenelig med reglerne for det indre marked, for så vidt angår varernes frie bevægelighed.
This situation would appear to be incompatible with the internal market rules on the free movement of goods.
Kan Kommissionen uddybe, hvilke forholdsregler der er planlagt for at sikre de europæiske producenter af syntetisk ethanol en fri og uhindret adgang til det tyske marked?
Can the Commission explain what measures are planned in order to grant European synthetic ethanol producers free and unimpeded access to the German market?
I april 2009 godkendte Toldkodeksudvalget to anmodninger fra Sverige, hvorefter virksomheder har tilladelse til at importere ethanol til videreforarbejdning i henhold til toldkontrollen.
In April 2009 the Customs Code Committee approved two applications by Sweden to allow companies to import ethanol for processing in accordance with customs controls.
En sådan anmodning kræver en konsekvensanalyse, som vurderer følgerne af tiltagene for producenter af råprodukter i EU og undersøger, om der er et tilstrækkeligt udbud inden for EU.
Applications of this kind require an impact assessment to determine the repercussions of the measures on producers of raw materials in the EU and to examine whether there is sufficient supply within the EU.
En tilladelse må ikke gives, så længe en sådan videnskabelig undersøgelse ikke er gennemført.
Authorisation may not be granted until such an economic review has been carried out.
Kan Kommissionen redegøre for, om en sådan undersøgelse er blevet foretaget, og om den endelige afgørelse blev truffet på grundlag af resultaterne fra undersøgelsen?
Can the Commission explain whether such a review has been carried out and whether the final decision, on the basis of the results of that review, has been taken?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3798/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3798/09
Om: Klage over den »faste Femern Bælt-jernbane-/motorvejsforbindelse«
Subject: Complaint about the ‘fixed Fehmarn Belt road and rail link’
Den 18. juni 2009 kommer forbundsregeringens udkast vedrørende bygningen af den faste Femern Bælt-forbindelse til afstemning i den tyske Forbundsdag.
On 18 June 2009 the federal government bill concerning the building of the so-called fixed Fehmarn Belt link was put to the vote in the German Bundestag.
Efter at den danske regering har godkendt byggeriet og finansieringen af broen, ser modstanderne af dette projekt kun mulighed for at forhindre byggeriet ved at klage til Kommissionen.
Now that the Danish Government has approved the building of and financing for the bridge, the only option left to the opponents of the project to prevent its implementation is to complain to the Commission.
Ud fra miljømæssige og økonomiske aspekter anser de projektet for meningsløst.
They consider the project to be absurd for environmental and economic reasons.
De miljømæssige betænkeligheder vedrørende »århundredets projekt« vil også efter undertegnelsen af en aftale mellem Tyskland og Danmark være massive.
Even though the international treaty between Germany and Denmark has been signed, there are still some major environmental doubts concerning the ‘project of the century’.
Hvis de finansielle risici allerede til at begynde med var svære at beregne, så er de kommet helt ud af kontrol i slipstrømmen på den internationale økonomi- og finanskrise.
Already difficult to estimate from the start, as a result of the ongoing international financial and economic crisis the financial risks are now escalating out of all proportion.
Den tyske forbundsrevisionsret retter ligeledes svære indsigelser mod forbundsregeringens måde at agere på, idet hverken de miljømæssige eller de økonomiske risici i forbindelse med byggeriet kan forudses på nuværende tidspunkt.
The Federal Court of Auditors in Germany has also severely criticised the action taken by the federal government, since neither the environmental nor the economic risks of the project can yet be predicted.
I den forbindelse indgav protestgruppen mod en fast Femern Bælt-forbindelse den 25. maj 2009 en klage til Kommissionen.
In this regard, on 25 May 2009 the ‘Action Alliance against the fixed Fehmarn Belt link’ submitted a complaint to the Commission.
Deler Kommissionen protestgruppens vurdering (som den fremføres i klageproceduren), nemlig at der bør indledes en overtrædelsesprocedure mod Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland og Kongeriget Danmark?
Does the Commission share the view of the Action Alliance (as set out in the complaint) that infringement proceedings should be initiated against the Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of Denmark?
Deler Kommissionen den opfattelse, at planlægningen af dette projekt strider mod fællesskabsretten, fordi det skal tildeles et dansk planlægningsselskab på basis af en bilateral aftale?
Does the Commission agree that the planning arrangements for this project breach Community law, as under a bilateral treaty a Danish planning company is to be awarded the contract?
Skulle projektet have været udbudt i hele Europa?
Should the project have been put out to tender throughout Europe?