natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dette skyldes ofte, at det lokale politi ikke har kendskab til, at der på belgiske kørekort, som udstedtes før 1989, kun angives den højeste kategori, hvortil kørekortet er udstedt, men at de også gælder for de lavere kategorier (dvs. at kørekort til køretøjer i kategori C også gælder for kategori A og B).
This problem frequently stems from the fact that the local police are no longer aware that Belgian driving licences issued before 1989 only indicate the highest category of vehicle for which the licence was issued, even though they are also valid for lower categories (e.g. driving licences for vehicles in category C are also valid for categories A and B).
Kan Kommissionen over for Frankrig insistere på, at EU-lovgivningen lokalt skal overholdes korrekt, således at velorienterede chauffører ikke med urette pålægges bøder?
Can the European Commission urge France to ensure that European law is properly enforced in that country so that qualified drivers are no longer fined for no good reason?
Hvilke ordninger kan der indføres, således at chauffører, der med urette har fået bøder, nemt kan kræve det betalte beløb tilbage?
What arrangements can be made so that drivers who have incorrectly been fined can easily claim back the sum in question?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4453/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4453/08
Om: Afbrydelse af satellitsignalet fra New Tang Dynasty Television
Subject: Break in transmission of New Tang Dynasty TV's satellite signal
New Tang Dynasty Television (NTDTV) er en almennyttig kinesisk fjernsynsstation, som formidler uafhængige og ikke-censurerede nyheder til ca. 40 mio. kinesere.
New Tang Dynasty Television (NTDTV) is a non-profit-making Chinese TV broadcaster which provides some 40 million Chinese nationals with independent, uncensored reporting.
Den 16. juni 2008 konstateredes det, at signalet fra NTDTV ikke længere kunne modtages i Kina.
On 16 June 2008 it was noted that the NTDTV signal could no longer be received in China.
Eutelsat, som er det firma, der har ansvaret for satellitforbindelsen, mener, at årsagen til afbrydelsen er et teknisk problem, men nægter at give nærmere oplysninger eller forsøge at genetablere signalet.
The firm of Eutelsat, which is responsible for the satellite link, blames a technical problem for the break in transmission, but refuses to give further details or attempt to restore the signal.
At dette sker syv uger før starten på De Olympiske Lege, og lige efter at der blev underskrevet en milliardkontrakt mellem de kinesiske myndigheder og Eutelsats moderselskab, lader formode, at der er tale om mere end et teknisk problem.
The fact that this has happened seven weeks before the start of the Olympic Games, and just after a contract worth billions of euros was concluded between the Chinese Government and Eutelsat’s parent holding company, makes one suspect that there is more to this than just a technical problem.
Noget lignende skete i 2005, hvor Eutelsat først efter protest fra bl.a. medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet genetablerede forbindelsen og NTDTV kunne genoptage sine udsendelser.
A similar incident occurred in 2005, when Eutelsat restored the link enabling NTDTV to resume broadcasts only after a protest by several MEPs among others.
EU har internationalt hidtil gjort en stor indsats for at forsvare universelle værdier, såsom ytringsfrihed, pressefrihed og værdierne i et demokratisk, pluralistisk og åbent samfund.
The European Union has already made many efforts at international level to defend universal values such as freedom of expression, freedom of the press and the values of a democratic, pluralist and open society.
Kender Kommissionen allerede NTDTV’s problemer? —
Is the Commission already aware of the problems encountered by NTDTV? —
Hvad mener Kommissionen om Eutelsats adfærd? —
What is the Commission's opinion of the actions of Eutelsat? —
Agter Kommissionen at tage initiativ til at få NTDTV’s signal genetableret?
Does the Commission plan any initiatives with a view to having NTDTV’s signal restored?
Hvad agter den i bekræftende fald at gøre?
If so, what are they?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4454/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4454/08
Om: Stærkere parlamentarisk kontrol med Frontex
Subject: Stricter parliamentary control of Frontex
Frontex er et af de vigtigste agenturer, der er oprettet de seneste år.
Frontex is one of the most important agencies to have been set up in the last few years.
Det kan yde et værdifuldt bidrag til bekæmpelsen af ulovlig indvandring.
It may make a valuable contribution in the fight against illegal immigration.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om der er planer om at inddrage Europa-Parlamentet nærmere i Frontex’ aktiviteter?
Can the Commission state whether there are any plans to involve the European Parliament more closely in the activities of Frontex?
Ville der ikke være mulighed for at få Frontex’ bestyrelsesformand og administrerende direktør til at komme til et plenarmøde eller udvalgsmøde, når en bestemt gruppe parlamentsmedlemmer/et parlamentsudvalg anmoder herom for at få en redegørelse for Frontex’ aktiviteter eller for generelt at drøfte følsomme emner og problemer?
Would it not be possible to summon the Chairman of the Management Board of Frontex and its Executive Director to appear at plenary sittings or committee meetings, if requested by a particular group of MEPs or a parliamentary committee respectively, to give an account of the activities of Frontex or to hold a general discussion on specific areas of difficulty or problems?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4455/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4455/08
Om: Måling af Frontex' effektivitet
Subject: Measuring the effectiveness of Frontex
Finder Kommissionen det ikke også hensigtsmæssigt, at Frontex fastlægger regler for lagring af oplysninger, som muliggør en bedre evaluering af operationernes resultater og virkning?
Does the Commission not also consider it appropriate for formulate rules on the storage of data to permit better evaluation of the results and impact of operations?
Er det navnlig ikke hensigtsmæssigt at få det bedst mulige billede af den korrekte identitet på de personer, der tilbageholdes og tilbagesendes, samt af, i hvor stor udstrækning operationerne virkelig bidrager til at reducere – og ikke blot flytte – den ulovlige indvandring?
In particular, would it not also be appropriate to obtain the best possible picture of the real identity of the people who are arrested and expelled, and of the extent to which operations actually contribute to reducing — rather than merely displacing — illegal immigration?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4456/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4456/08
Naturligvis er Frontex afhængig af medlemsstaternes vilje til at sørge for, at det får materiel og personale.
Frontex is of course dependent on the willingness of the Member States to supply equipment and staff.
Nogle medlemsstater lover meget, men yder lidt.
Some Member States promise much but deliver little.
Kan Kommissionen blot til min orientering oplyse, om det overvejes at indsætte en bestemmelse i Frontex-forordningen, hvor medlemsstaterne forpligtes til at levere materiel eller deltage i operationer?
Can the Commission tell me, purely for information, whether there are any plans to incorporate in the Frontex regulation a provision requiring the Member States to supply equipment or participate in operations?
Overvejes der måske også andre muligheder, såsom at indføre en ordning med større finansielle bidrag fra medlemsstaterne?
Is any thought perhaps being given to a different option, namely a system for increased financial contributions from Member States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4464/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4464/08
Om: Kompensation og assistance til flypassagerer
Subject: Compensation and assistance to air passengers
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4465/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4465/08
Om: Uddannelse af buschauffører
Subject: Training of professional bus drivers
Kan Kommissionen oplyse dens seneste holdning til Irlands gennemførelse af direktivet om uddannelse af buschauffører (2003/59/EF EUT L 226 af 10.9.2003, s. 4. ).
Could the Commission indicate the latest position in relation to Ireland's transposition of the directive on the training of professional drivers (2003/59/EC OJ L 226, 10.9.2003, p.
Er Kommissionen tilfreds med måden, hvorpå direktivet er gennemført?
4. ) and if it is satisfied with the way in which the directive has been implemented?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4466/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4466/08
Om: Sikkerhed for luftfartøjer fra tredjelande
Subject: Safety of third country aircraft
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om den er tilfreds med Irlands gennemførelse af direktivet om sikkerhed forbundet med tredjelandes luftfartøjer?
Could the Commission indicate if it is satisfied with the transposition of the directive on safety of third country aircraft particularly in relation to Ireland?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4467/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4467/08
Om: Beskyttelse af brugere af privat telekommunikation
Subject: Protection for users of private telecommunications
I hele EU har man privatiseret telekommunikationssektoren.
Across the EU we have privatised telecommunications.
Dette er sandsynligvis gjort for at skabe bedre service og billigere telekommunikation, alt imens der stadig sikres generel dækning.
Presumably this was done to provide better, cheaper telecommunications while still ensuring universal coverage.
For at sikre generel dækning i Irland, står Eircom, den tidligere statslige udbyder, for næsten alle telefonlinjer.
In order to ensure universal coverage, Eircom, the former public provider, supplies almost all phone lines.
Efter privatiseringen er der mange virksomheder, der sælger telekommunikationsydelser, men alle disse telefonbaserede ydelser er stadig afhængige af Eircoms telefonlinjer.
Since privatisation many companies are selling telecommunication services to customers, however almost all these phone-line-based services still depend on Eircom phone lines.
Hvis en kunde med en anden udbyder, f.eks. Smart, har et problem med linjen, er Smart desværre afskåret fra at reparere det, da den ikke ejer linjerne.
Unfortunately if a customer is with another provider, e.g. Smart, and there is a problem with the line, Smart are severely hampered from fixing it because they do not own the lines.
Eircom lader ikke til at være særlig motiveret til at hjælpe sine konkurrenter ved at vedligeholde linjer for kunder med andre udbydere.
Eircom it seems has little motivation to help its competitors by maintaining the lines of customers with other providers.
Resultatet er, at irske kunder fanges mellem to selskaber uden en telefonlinje, der virker.
The result is that Irish customers are caught in the middle without a working phone line.
ComReg (Commission for Communications Regulation — den irske tilsynsmyndighed på telekommunikationsområdet) lader ikke til at kunne hjælpe og kunne derfor for nyligt blot fortælle en af mine vælgere, Anthony Henderson fra Cork, at »det var kompliceret«.
ComReg (Commission for Communications Regulation, Ireland) seems unable to help and instead could only tell one of my constituents, Anthony Henderson of Cork, recently that ‘it is complicated’.
Hvilken beskyttelse er der for brugere og serviceudbydere, der er afhængige af en »generelt dækkende« udbyder af linjer i et privatiseret telekommunikationsmarked?
What protection is there for users and service providers relying on the ‘universal’ provider of lines in a privatised telecommunications market?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4468/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4468/08
Om: Evaluering af nitratdirektivet
Subject: Evaluation of the Nitrates Directive
Europa-Parlamentet gik i forbindelse med vedtagelsen af grundvandsdirektivet ind for, at der skulle foretages en grundig evaluering af direktivet sammen med de andre relevante direktiver, hvorunder nitratdirektivet naturligvis må henregnes.
When decisions were being taken on the Groundwater Directive, the European Parliament insisted that the Groundwater Directive should be thoroughly evaluated, in conjunction with the related directives, which of course include the Nitrates Directive.
Dette er baggrunden for grundvandsdirektivets artikel 11.
This led to Article 11 of the Groundwater Directive.
I sin lovgivningsmæssige beslutning af 11. december 2007 om ordningen med krydsoverensstemmelse ( P6_TA(2007)0598 ) opfordrede Parlamentet til en forenkling, forbedring og en harmonisering af lovgivningen om nitrat, og i sin beslutning af 12. marts 2008 om biogas ( P6_TA(2008)0095 ) anmodede det om en vurdering af, om nitratdirektivet var blevet overflødigt, ligesom det krævede, at definitionen af husdyrgødning blev taget op til overvejelse.
In its Legislative Resolution of 11 December 2007 on the cross-compliance system ( P6_TA(2007)0598 ), the European Parliament called for legislation on nitrates to be simplified, reduced and improved, and in its Resolution of 12 March 2008 on the production of biogas by means of livestock manure fermentation ( P6_TA(2008)0095 ) it called for an assessment of whether or not the Nitrates Directive had become superfluous and for the definition of livestock manure in the Nitrates Directive to be reviewed without delay.
Finder Kommissionen, at nitratdirektivet er et effektivt instrument til opnåelse af de fastsatte mål, eller mener den, at medlemsstaterne snarere bør have større frihed til at træffe foranstaltninger, der i højere grad er tilpasset den specifikke situation i de enkelte medlemsstater med henblik på at nå målene (som er fastlagt i grundvandsdirektivet)?
Does the Commission consider the Nitrates Directive to be an efficient instrument by means of which to achieve the desired objectives, or does it consider that it would be better to give Member States greater freedom to adopt measures better tailored to the specific situation in the various Member States in order to achieve the desired objectives (as already laid down in the Groundwater Directive)?
Er det efter Kommissionens opfattelse en hensigtsmæssig regulering at opretholde to direktiver for ét problem?
Does the Commission believe that retaining two directives to deal with a single problem constitutes good regulation?
Mener Kommissionen, at fastholdelsen af nitratdirektivet er i overensstemmelse med dens mål om en lettelse af de administrative byrder?
Does the Commission consider that retaining the Nitrates Directive is in line with its objectives with regard to reducing administrative burdens?
Mener Kommissionen, at nitratdirektivets bestemmelser fremmer anvendelsen af kunstgødning i stedet for husdyrgødning, idet det fastsatte maksimum for anvendelse på 170 kg nitrat (bilag III, nr. 2) kun gælder for husdyrgødning og ikke for kunstgødning?
Does the Commission consider that the provisions of the Nitrates Directive encourage the use of artificial fertiliser rather than livestock manure, as the maximum application figure of 170 kg nitrates (Annex III, Section 2) applies only to livestock manure and not to artificial fertiliser?
Mener Kommissionen, at nitratdirektivet på dette punkt er i overensstemmelse med dens målsætning om generelt at begrænse landbrugets indvirkning på miljøet?
Is the Nitrates Directive, in this respect, in line with the Commission's objective of reducing the overall environmental impact of agriculture?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4469/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4469/08
Om: Anvendelse af kviksølv i vacciner
Subject: Use of mercury in vaccines
Kommissionen indledte i 2005 fællesskabsstrategien for kviksølv.
In 2005 the Commission adopted the Community strategy on mercury.
Denne strategi omfatter desværre ikke reduceret anvendelse og forbud mod kviksølv i vacciner.
This does not, however, include a reduction in the use of, or a ban on, mercury in vaccines.
I vacciner bliver kviksølv anvendt i form af thimerosal (etylkviksølv) som konserveringsmiddel.
Mercury is used in vaccines in the form of the preservative thimerosal (ethylmercury).
Mange enkelt- og kombinationsvacciner såsom hepatitis B-vacciner, DTP-vacciner (difteri, tetanus, kighoste), DT-vacciner (difteri og tetanus) samt influenzavacciner indeholder thimerosal.
Many single and combined vaccines such as those for hepatitis B, DPT (diphtheria‑whooping cough-tetanus), DT (diphtheria‑tetanus) and flu vaccines contain thimerosal.
Kan Kommissionen give et overblik over, hvilke af de standardbørnevaccinationer og andre anbefalede vacciner, der anvendes i Europa, der stadig indeholder thimerosal?
Can the Commission provide a list of the standard child vaccines and other recommended vaccines used in Europe which contain thimerosal?
Hvilken procentdel af de europæiske børn er stadig udsat for thimerosal i vacciner?
What percentage of Europe’s children are still being exposed to thimerosal in vaccines?
Er det ikke sandt, at thimerosal helt kan udelades i Europa ved at anvende andre konserveringsmuligheder?
Is it not true that thimerosal can be completely avoided in Europe by using other preservatives?
Findes der EU-medlemsstater, der helt forbyder anvendelse af thimerosal, eller hvor det frivilligt ikke anvendes længere?
Are there any Member States which practise a total ban on Thimerosal or where it is subject to a voluntary ban?
Det Europæiske Lægemiddelagentur EMEA fastslog i 2004, at der ikke var nogen sammenhæng mellem thimerosal og forekomsten af bestemte neurologiske udviklingsforstyrrelser, men udtalte sig til fordel for vacciner uden eller med så lidt thimerosal som muligt.
In 2004 the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) was unable to establish any connection between Thimerosal and the incidence of specific neurological developmental disorders; it did, however, come down in favour of vaccines containing no or minimal amounts of thimerosal.
Har Kommissionen siden 2004 opnået ny viden om risici ved thimerosal, navnlig i forbindelse med udvikling af autisme hos børn?
Has the Commission received any new information on risks associated with thimerosal since 2004, specifically on the risk of the development of autism in children?
Hvordan begrunder Kommissionen, at der gennem EU-kviksølvstrategien findes et forbud mod kviksølvimport, men at der ikke er noget forbud på et så følsomt område som vacciner?
How does the Commission explain the situation whereby the EU mercury strategy imposes a ban on the export of mercury but none on its use in vaccines, which is such a sensitive area?
Burde anvendelsen af thimerosal i vacciner ikke forbydes under hensyntagen til forsigtighedsprincippet?
Should the precautionary principle not require the use of thimerosal in vaccines to be banned?
Støtter Kommission forskning i at finde en erstatning for thimerosal i vacciner i sydlige lande, hvor det anvendes som konserveringsmiddel?
Is the Commission promoting research into a replacement for thimerosal in vaccines administered in southern countries where it is used as a preservative?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4470/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4470/08
Om: Sundhedsrisiko som følge af flystøj
Subject: Health risks caused by aircraft noise
Ifølge oplysninger fra det tyske miljødirektorat lider 13 mio. borgere i Tyskland under støjbelastning med betydelige sundhedsmæssige konsekvenser.
According to the Federal Environment Ministry, 13 million German citizens suffer from excessive noise, with considerable health consequences.
I marts i år offentliggjorde et internationalt forskerhold under ledelse af Department of Epidemiology and Public Health på Imperial College London resultaterne af en undersøgelse af konsekvenserne af fly- og trafikstøj for de berørte borgeres helbred (den såkaldte HYENA-undersøgelse).
In March of this year, an international team of researchers led by the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health of Imperial College London published the results of a study on the effects of aircraft and road traffic noise on local people (the ‘HYENA’ study).
Projektet blev finansieret af Kommissionen (GD Forskning, projekt QLRT-2001-02501).
The project was financed by the European Commission (DG Research, grant QLRT-2001-02501).
Den fire år lange undersøgelse kommer frem til det resultat, at en forhøjelse af det gennemsnitlige natlige niveau for flystøj med 15 decibel vil medføre en 14 % højere risiko for for højt blodtryk.
The four‑year study found that a 10‑decibel increase in average aircraft noise levels at night caused the risk of high blood pressure to increase by 14 %.
Hvis den gennemsnitlige trafikstøj i dagtimerne forhøjes med 10 decibel, forøges sandsynligheden for for højt blodtryk med 10 %.
A 10‑decibel increase in average daytime traffic noise causes the likelihood of high blood pressure to rise by 10 %.
Indirekte stiger risikoen for lidelser i hjertets kransårer dermed som følge af støjbelastning.
Noise therefore indirectly increases the risk of coronary heart disease.
Hvordan bedømmer Kommissionen resultaterne af undersøgelsen?
What is the Commission’s view of the results of the study?
Mener Kommissionen ikke også, at i lyset af de bekymrende resultater af HYENA-undersøgelsen bør handlingsplanerne om fremlæggelse af konkrete grænseværdier samt bindende foranstaltninger og tidsplaner til støjreduktion suppleres, i stedet for at medlemsstaterne kan bestemme midlerne?
Does the Commission not also think that, in view of the worrying results of the HYENA study, the requirement of specific limit values and binding measures and timetables for noise reduction should be added to the action plans, rather than Member States being left to decide on the measures to be taken?
Navnlig natlig fly- og trafikstøj er ifølge HYENA-undersøgelsen sundhedsskadelig.
According to the HYENA study, nighttime aircraft and traffic noise are particularly damaging to health.
Ifølge en rapport fra Kommissionen om gennemførelse af direktiv 2002/30/EF af 15. februar 2008 har kun fire europæiske lufthavne absolut forbud mod natflyvninger.
A report by the Commission on the transposition of Directive 2002/30/EC of 15 February 2008 states that there is a complete ban on night flights at only four European airports.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at det er på tide at indføre et forbud mod natflyvninger, der skal indføres i hele EU, med henblik på den planlagte ændring af direktivet?
Does the Commission not think that, with a view to the planned review of the directive, a Europe‑wide ban on night flights is long overdue?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4471/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4471/08
Om: Ulovlig affaldsforbrænding i Grækenland
Subject: Illegal waste incineration in Greece
Dommen indeholder et påbud om at indstille denne praksis inden udgangen af 2008.
The judgment contains the requirement to cease this practice by the end of 2008.
Ifølge beretninger nægter de græske myndigheder at gribe ind over for disse overtrædelser.
Reports suggest that the Greek authorities are refusing to take action in such cases.
Det kan frygtes, at myndighederne vil forholde sig som i 2000, da driften af et ulovligt affaldsforbrændingsanlæg først blev indstillet, efter at EF-Domstolen havde udstedt bøder (sag C-387/97 af 4. juli 2000).
There is a fear that they are behaving as they did in 2000, when an illegal waste incineration plant only stopped operating after the ECJ had imposed a fine (Case C‑387/97, 4.7.2000).
Ifølge øjenvidneberetninger bliver der i hvert fald i byerne Kranidi og Ermioni stadig åbent afbrændt affald.
Eyewitness reports state that open waste incineration is still continuing, at least in the towns of Kranidi and Ermioni.
Har Kommissionen kendskab til antallet af ulovlige deponeringer, der i dag drives i Grækenland?
Does the Commission know how many illegal waste disposal sites are currently in operation in Greece?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse status for de græske myndigheders gennemførelse af EF-domstolens dom C-502/03?
Can the Commission give any details on the situation of the transposition of ECJ Case C‑502/03 by the Greek authorities?
Hvor mange af de ulovlige forbrændingssteder har indtil nu indstillet driften?
How many illegal incineration sites have shut down since the judgment was passed?
Hvilken viden har Kommissionen om, at de græske myndigheder nægter at gribe ind over for de miljøskadelige affaldsforbrændinger?
What does the Commission know about the Greek authorities’ refusal to take action against the waste incineration, which is harmful to the environment?