natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kan Kommissionen give en begrundelse for valget af denne usædvanlige og uigennemsigtige procedure i forbindelse med USA's anmodning om data fra de belgiske myndigheder inden for rammerne af det retlige samarbejde og for de belgiske myndigheders bilaterale indhentning af data fra andre medlemsstater?
Can the Commission state the reasons for choosing the unusual and opaque procedure for the US to request the data from the Belgian authorities, in the context of judicial cooperation, and for the Belgian authorities in turn to obtain the data from other Member States bilaterally?
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at anvendelsesområdet for aftalen ikke vil blive udvidet med mindre præcise definitioner (dvs. »risici« i stedet for »alvorlige risici«) og mindre skærpede kriterier for overførsel af data (dvs. sager baseret på »oplysninger« frem for »beviser«)?
Can the Commission confirm that the scope of the Agreement will not be widened, by less precise definitions (i.e. ‘risks’ instead of ‘serious risks’), and by softening criteria for data transfers (i.e. for cases based on ‘information’ rather than ‘evidence’)?
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at den til enhver tid vil opfylde det vigtige krav i relation til databeskyttelse om en detaljeret definition af de data, der indsamles, og er Kommissionen enig i, at forslag om ikke at specificere de data, der er dækket af aftalen, er i strid med EU's og de internationale databeskyttelsesregler?
Can the Commission confirm that it will at all times strictly adhere to the key data protection requirement of a detailed definition of the data that are being collected, and does the Commission agree that any proposals not to specify the data covered by the Agreement are in violation of EU and international data protection rules?
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at indsamling, lagring og anvendelse af data vil ske i overensstemmelse med EU's regler om databeskyttelse frem for de retlige bestemmelser i USA eller tredjelande, som eventuelt modtager de pågældende data fra USA?
Can the Commission confirm that the collection, storage and use of data will be governed entirely by EU rules on data protection, rather than the legal regimes of the US or third countries that may receive these data from the US?
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at reglerne også vil gælde for lagringsperioder, og at kravet om destruering af de pågældende data efter den lovlige lagringsperiode vil blive opfyldt?
Can the Commission confirm that this also applies to storage periods and the obligation to destroy the data after the legal storage period?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5296/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5296/09
Om: EU's tiltrædelse af internationale konventioner
Subject: EU signatory to international conventions
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvilke internationale konventioner, den vil anbefale EU at tiltræde, når Lissabontraktaten er trådt i kraft?
Once the Treaty of Lisbon is in force, can the Commission indicate which international conventions it will recommend the EU signs?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5297/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5297/09
Om: Støtte til fiskeriaktiviteter
Subject: Subsidies to support fishing activities
I en ny rapport fra fishsubsidy.org (»Through the net«, som kan downloades fra http://www.followthemoney.eu/through-the-net) konkluderes det, at en række medlemsstater ikke har opfyldt bestemmelserne i artikel 53, litra b, i finansforordningen og heller ikke gennemført forordningen om strukturstøtte til fiskerisektoren ((EF) nr. 498/2007 EUT L 120 af 10.5.2007, s. 1. ).
A recent report by fishsubsidy.org (‘Through the net’ downloadable at http://www.followthemoney.eu/through-the-net) concludes that a number of Member States fail to comply with Article 53(b) of the Financial Regulation and the implementation of regulations for structural support for the fisheries sector ((EC) No 498/2007 OJ L 120, 10.5.2007, p.
Hvilke medlemsstater har ikke opfyldt kravene om at offentliggøre oplysninger om anvendelse af strukturstøtte til fiskerisektoren? 2.
Which Member States have not complied with the requirement to disclose information concerning the use of structural support for the fisheries sector? 2.
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe for at sikre, at disse krav opfyldes, og vil disse foranstaltninger også kunne træffes i landbrugssektoren for at sikre tilstrækkelig redegørelse for anvendelse af offentlige midler? 3.
What action is the Commission taking to ensure compliance with these requirements, and is this the equivalent of action that may be taken in the agriculture sector to ensure proper accounting for the use of public money? 3.
Mener Kommissionen, at det europæiske åbenhedsinitiativ fremmer — frem for at hæmme — offentliggørelsen af relevante oplysninger om anvendelsen af offentlige midler?
Is the Commission satisfied that the European Transparency Initiative is increasing rather than decreasing the disclosure of relevant information on how public monies are being spent?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5298/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5298/09
Om: Misbrug af statsstøtte til Opel
Subject: Abuse of state aid to Opel
Den Europæiske Unions grundlæggende dokument, Romtraktaten fra 1957, indeholder blandt andet et løfte om »gennemførelse af en ordning, der sikrer, at konkurrencen inden for det indre marked ikke fordrejes«, hvorved grundlaget for EU's vigtigste mission blev fastsat, nemlig at forhindre misbrug af statsstøtte,
Considering that the founding document of the European Union, the 1957 Treaty of Rome, promised — among other things — ‘a system ensuring that competition in the common marked is not distorted’, laying the ground for the EU's main mission of preventing the abuse of state aid;
Den tyske regering har fra maj 2009 stillet forskellige lån eller overgangslån til rådighed for Opel med henblik på at støtte salget af gruppen til Magna, en canadisk reservedelsleverandør, og Sberbank, et russisk finansieringsselskab,
Considering the various loans or bridging loans which the German Government offered to Opel starting from May 2009 to support the sale of the Group to Magna, a Canadian car-parts supplier, and Sberbank, a Russian financier;
Andre tilbud — f.eks. fra Fiat — som ikke involverede statsstøtte, blev afvist af den tyske regering,
Considering the fact that other offers — such as Fiat's — that did not involve any state aid were rejected by the German Government;
Vil Kommissionen på denne baggrund træde i karakter og sikre, at bestemmelserne i EU-retten finder anvendelse, og at principperne i Romtraktaten følges?
Can the Commission exercise its authority on the matter, making sure that the EU's rules are applied and the principles that were enshrined in the Treaty of Rome are respected?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5299/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5299/09
Om: Lokale indkøb
Subject: Local procurement
Kommissionen bedes redegøre for de EU-retlige bestemmelser vedrørende indføjelse af klausuler i kontrakter om, at en vis procentdel af arbejdskraften på et projekt skal være fra lokalområdet?
What is the European law regarding inserting clauses into contracts stating that a certain percentage of labour on a project must be from the local area?
Er dette lovligt?
Would this be acceptable?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5300/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5300/09
Om: Kvoter for musik, der er produceret i Irland
Subject: Irish-produced music quota
Indeholder EU-retten bestemmelser, som forhindrer Irlands reguleringsmyndighed for radio- og tv-virksomhed, Broadcasting Commission of Ireland, i eller begrænser mulighederne for at indføre et kvotesystem for at sikre, at musik, der er produceret i Irland, udsendes — og at irske musikere får mulighed for at fremføre deres værker — på kommercielle og offentlige radiostationer?
Does European law in any way prevent or restrict the Irish State broadcasting regulator, the Broadcasting Commission of Ireland, from introducing a quota system to ensure that Irish-produced music and Irish musicians are provided with opportunities to promote their work on commercial and State-owned radio stations?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5301/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5301/09
af Sophia in 't Veld (ALDE) , Michael Cashman (S&D) , Ulrike Lunacek (Verts/ALE) og Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE)
by Sophia in ’t Veld (ALDE) , Michael Cashman (S&D) , Ulrike Lunacek (Verts/ALE) and Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE)
Om: Forbud mod Gay Pride-parade 2009 i Beograd
Subject: Belgrade Pride 2009 banned
Arrangørerne af Gay Pride-paraden i Beograd blev den 18. september 2009 underrettet om, at der var udstedt forbud mod paraden, som skulle have fundet sted dagen efter.
The organisers of the Belgrado Pride were informed on 18 September 2009 that the Pride planned to take place the next day was banned.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at Gay Pride-paraden i Beograd den 19. september blev aflyst, fordi myndighederne afviste at yde den nødvendige beskyttelse?
Is the Commission aware of the cancellation of the Belgrade Gay Pride on 19 September, due to the refusal of the authorities to provide the required protection?
Er Kommissionen enig i, at dette er en overtrædelse af retten til forsamlingsfrihed?
Would the Commission agree that this is a violation of the right of assembly?
Er Kommissionen enig i, at Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol med sin retspraksis har bekræftet, at offentlige myndigheder skal yde passende beskyttelse til fredelige demonstrationer?
Would the Commission agree that case-law of the European Court of Human Rights has confirmed that public authorities are obliged to provide adequate protection for peaceful demonstrations?
Har Kommissionen hurtigst muligt kontaktet myndighederne i Beograd?
Has the Commission contacted the Belgrade authorities as a matter of urgency?
Vil Kommissionen anvende sanktioner over for Serbien for denne overtrædelse af grundlæggende rettigheder?
Does the Commission intend to apply sanctions to Serbia for this violation of fundamental rights?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe for at sikre, at fremtidige Gay Pride-parader kan gennemføres uforstyrret på et passende offentligt sted med tilstrækkelig politibeskyttelse?
What steps will the Commission take to ensure that future Gay Pride marches can take place undisturbed, at a suitable public location, with adequate protection by the police?
Erkender Kommissionen, at denne sag er en del af et større problem?
Does the Commission recognise that this incident is part of a wider issue?
Vil Kommissionen udarbejde en strategi for at sikre, at fremtidige Gay Pride-parader kan gennemføres overalt i Den Europæiske Union, kandidat- og tiltrædelseslande samt partnerlande?
Will the Commission set up a strategy to ensure that Gay Pride marches can take place anywhere in the European Union, candidate and accession countries, and partner countries?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5302/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5302/09
af Åsa Westlund (S&D)
by Åsa Westlund (S&D)
Om: Bistanden til Guatemala
Subject: Aid to Guatemala
Guatemala er langtfra et af Latinamerikas fattigste lande, men ifølge Unicef er næsten halvdelen af Guatemalas børn alligevel kronisk underernærede.
Guatemala is far from being one of the poorest countries in Latin America; nevertheless, according to Unicef, almost half of Guatemala's children suffer from chronic malnutrition.
Ude i landsbyerne er situationen endnu værre – der når underernæringen blandt børn op på 80 %.
In rural areas the situation is even worse, with 80 % of children suffering malnutrition.
Denne kroniske situation er nu desuden blevet akut.
Moreover, this chronic situation has now become acute.
Højere verdensmarkedspriser på fødevarer kombineret med, at finanskrisen har medført, at meget færre penge sendes tilbage fra guatemalanere, der arbejder i USA, har drastisk øget fattigdommen i landet.
Higher world market prices for food, combined with the fact that the financial crisis has meant that far less money is sent back by Guatemalans working in the USA, has drastically increased poverty in the country.
Ud over disse to faktorer har en tørke i det østlige Guatemala yderligere forværret situationen.
In addition to these two factors, a drought in eastern Guatemala has exacerbated the situation even more.
Endnu mere foruroligende er det, at Guatemala faktisk er rigt nok til at kunne afhjælpe en stor del af problemerne.
Even more alarming is that Guatemala is actually rich enough to remedy many of the problems.
Andre latinamerikanske lande i samme situation, såsom Bolivia, Peru og Brasilien, har i modsætning til Guatemala haft held med at mindske sulten blandt børn.
Other Latin American countries in the same situation, such as Bolivia, Peru and Brazil, have, in contrast to Guatemala, succeeded in reducing child hunger.
Landets regering er fuld af gode forsætter, men det er ikke lykkedes den at inddrive tilstrækkelig med skatter fra velbjergede guatemalanere til at kunne opbygge en velfungerende samfundsstruktur i landet.
The country's government is full of good intentions but has not managed to collect sufficient taxes from wealthy Guatemalans to be able to build up a functioning social structure in the country.
Samtidig giver EU og resten af verden hvert år enorme summer i bistand til Guatemala.
At the same time, the EU and the rest of the world donate enormous sums in aid every year to Guatemala.
Hvad gør Kommissionen for at sikre, at den bistand, der gives, virkelig kommer frem til dem, der har behov for den?
What does the Commission do to ensure that the aid donated actually reaches those who need it?
Findes der en handlingsplan for at bekæmpe korruption og for gennem bistand at støtte en demokratisk opbygning af fungerende forvaltningsmyndigheder i landet?
Is there any action plan for combating corruption and, through aid, supporting the democratic establishment of functioning administrative authorities in the country?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5304/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5304/09
Hvordan agter Kommissionen at reagere på Moebus-rapporten vedrørende træthed blandt piloter og uforholdsmæssigt mange flyvetimer?
How does the Commission intend to respond to the ‘Moebus Report’ with regard to pilot fatigue and excessive flying hours?
Piloter har givet udtryk for bekymring over, at de nuværende flyvetidsbegrænsninger øger muligheden for træthed blandt piloter og risikoen for ulykker.
Pilots have raised concerns that current flight time limitations increase the possibility of fatigue among pilots and the risk of accidents.
Hvordan agter Kommissionen at afhjælpe dette?
How does the Commission plan to address this?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5305/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5305/09
Om: Svineinfluenza A — sygeforsikringer — eventuel koordination mellem EU og medlemsstaterne
Subject: Influenza A(H1N1) — health insurance — possible coordination between the EU and Member States
Som svar på min tidligere forespørgsel ( P-4387/09 ) erklærede kommissær Vassiliou på Kommissionens vegne, at Kommissionen, for så vidt angår influenza som følge af H1N1-virusset, ikke har til hensigt at træffe nogen foranstaltninger vedrørende sygeforsikringer, hverken på egen foranledning eller i samarbejde med medlemsstaterne.
In answer to my earlier question (P‑4387/09) the Commission, represented by Commissioner Vassiliou, stated that, as regards the form of influenza caused by the H1N1 virus, it did not intend to ‘take any measures related to insurance, either independently or in coordination with Member States’.
Den 12. oktober 2009 understregede Rådet behovet for, at medlemsstaterne samarbejder om spørgsmål, der vedrører flere sektorer, især i forbindelse med transport-, energi-, informations- og telekommunikationssektoren, for at afbøde de økonomiske og sociale indvirkninger af denne og kommende pandemier eller lignende trusler mod sundheden (16.), samt at de nationale foranstaltninger bliver yderligere forstærket ved hjælp af samarbejds- og koordinationsforanstaltninger truffet af Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne (15.).
On 12 October the Council pointed to the need for Member States to work together on multi-sectoral issues, for instance in the transport, energy, and information and telecommunications sectors, in order to mitigate the economic and social impact of the present pandemic and, moreover, future pandemics and other similar health threats (16); and it also noted that the effectiveness of national measures is enhanced by cooperation and coordination measures taken by the Commission and the Member States (15).
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5306/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5306/09
Om: Tidsplan for gennemførelsen af pilotprojektet for informations- og varslingsnetværket vedrørende kritisk infrastruktur (CIWIN)
Subject: Timetable for the implementation of the Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN) pilot project
I de nyeste dokumenter om dette emne henvises der til gennemførelsen af pilotprojektet, der iværksættes i oktober i år.
The most recent documents concerning this matter referred to the implementation of the pilot project commencing in October this year.
Har Kommissionen oplysninger om tidsplanen for gennemførelsen af pilotprojektet for informations- og varslingsnetværket vedrørende kritisk infrastruktur?
Can the Commission give details concerning the timetable for implementation of the Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN) pilot project?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5310/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5310/09
Om: EU's holdning til industriel skovhugst som et middel til bekæmpelse af klimaændringerne
Subject: EU's position on industrial logging as a means of combating climate change
Greenpeace har som følge af udviklingen i forhandlingerne på FN's møde i Bangkok, Thailand, i sidste uge om forberedelsen af klimatopmødet i København udtalt, at EU går ind for at give tilskud til skovbrugsindustrien som en mekanisme til reduktion af klimaændringerne.
Following the negotiations at the UN preparatory meeting for the Copenhagen climate change conference that took place this week in Bangkok, Thailand, Greenpeace is reporting that the EU is in favour of financing the timber industry through its donations as a mechanism for climate change mitigation.
Ifølge nævnte organisations eksperter henvises der i konsensusdokumenterne i forbindelse med de internationale aftaler om klimaændringer, der blev opnået på Bali i 2007 og i Poznan i 2008, til, hvordan skovene bør behandles i den kommende REDD-mekanisme (Reduktion af emissioner fra skovrydning og skovødelæggelse), idet begrebet »bæredygtig skovforvaltning« anvendes som en bred definition, der omfatter emner som f.eks. de lokale samfunds anvendelse og bevarelse af skovene – en aktivitet, der ikke nødvendigvis indebærer omfattende industrielle aktiviteter.
According to Greenpeace experts, the documents approved as part of the international agreements on climate change reached in Bali in 2007 and Poznan in 2008 refer to the approach that should be taken to forests in the future REDD mechanism (Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation).
I henhold til Greenpeace har skovbrugssektoren imidlertid siden da presset på for at få erstattet dette begreb med et andet, der, selv om det ligner, har en anden betydning.
The term ‘sustainable management of forests’ is used with a broad definition that includes topics such as the use and conservation of forests by local communities, an activity that does not necessarily involve large-scale industrial activity.
Sustainable Forest Management, eller SFM, er et begreb fra den industrielle skovbrugssektors sprogbrug, hvori det implicit ligger, at skovene skal udnyttes industrielt.
Nevertheless, as Greenpeace explains, the forestry industry has since been exerting pressure to exchange this concept for a different term that is very similar but has a different meaning: ‘Sustainable Forest Management’, or SFM, a term that belongs to the language of the timber industry and that takes it for granted that forests are to be exploited on an industrial scale.
Ifølge de samme eksperter oplagrer de store uberørte skovområder, der stadig findes i verden – primærskovene – fortsat kulstof, hvorfor det er meget vigtigt at bremse skovødelæggelsen og skovrydningen for at dæmme op for klimaændringerne.
According to the same experts, the large areas of intact forest that still remain on the planet — the primary forests — continue to store carbon, and it is therefore vital that their degradation and deforestation be curbed in order to curb climate change.
Det skønnes, at skovrydningen globalt set udgør næsten 20 % af drivhusgasserne.
It is calculated that, worldwide, deforestation accounts for almost 20 % of greenhouse gases.
Kan Kommissionen i forbindelse med disse oplysninger gøre nærmere rede for sin holdning til spørgsmålet?
In view of the above information, can the Commission state its position on this topic?
Er Kommissionen således ikke af den opfattelse, at EU i henhold til den nye formulering implicit ville støtte en ødelæggelse af skovene, hvilket ville være i strid med den egentlige prioritet, dvs. at bremse skovrydningen i troperne?
Does the Commission not believe that the new wording would lead to a situation where the EU would be implicitly supporting forest degradation, which would run counter to the true priority of halting tropical deforestation?
Er Kommissionen bevidst om, at man ved at give grønt lys for industriel skovhugst underminerer den globale indsats for at bekæmpe klimaændringerne og endog medvirker til at fremskynde dem?
Is the Commission aware that giving the go-ahead to industrial logging is undermining global efforts to combat climate change, and indeed helping to speed it up?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5311/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5311/09
Om: For høje detailtakster for brug af mobile datatjenester
Subject: Excessive retail charges for access to mobile data services
Privatkunder i Tyskland klager over til dels massivt opskruede priser for mobilt internet.
Retail customers in Germany are complaining about what are, in some cases, vastly excessive costs for mobile Internet connections.
Hos mange udbydere ligger detailtaksten pr. megabyte, der downloades, langt over 5 euro.
The retail charges with some service providers, for instance, are well above EUR 5 per downloaded megabyte (Mb).
Parlamentet, Kommissionen og Rådet har på et tidligt tidspunkt i forskellige meddelelser, afgørelser og beslutninger peget på den enorme betydning, som de såkaldte tredje generationstjenester (3G) har for erhvervsliv, samfund og kultur.
Parliament, the Commission and the Council signalled early on, in a range of communications, decisions and resolutions, the huge importance of what are known as 3rd-generation (3G) services for the economy, society and culture.
Men på EU‑plan var det i 2008 ifølge en Eurostat‑undersøgelse kun 3 % af befolkningen, som brugte en 3G‑mobiltelefon til at gå på internettet.
A Eurostat survey shows, however, that in 2008 only 3 % of the population across the European Union used a 3G mobile telephone to access the Internet.
I Tyskland var det i 2008 kun 2 % http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=de&pcode=tin00117&plugin=0 .
The figure for Germany in 2008 was only 2 % http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=de&pcode=tin00117&plugin=0 .
Ikke desto mindre ville mobilt internet allerede nu have potentiale til et massemarked.
Mobile Internet would already have the potential to develop into a mass market.
Mener Kommissionen, at en detailtakst for brug af mobile datatjenester på 5 euro pr. megabyte, der downloades, står i et rimeligt forhold til de faktiske omkostninger for udbyderne?
Does the Commission consider that retail charges of EUR 5 per downloaded Mb for access to mobile data services are in proportion to the actual costs incurred by service providers?
Har Kommissionen informationer om, hvorvidt der også i andre medlemslande er for høje detailtakster for brug af mobile datatjenester?
Does the Commission have information concerning excessive retail charges for access to mobile data services in other Member States?