natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Men i dette tilfælde drejer det sig om en begrænsning i udvalget, fordi man kun kan anvende tilbehør af mærket Apple.
At all events, choice is being restricted, since only Apple accessories can be purchased.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at denne situation er i strid med den gældende fællesskabslovgivning om konkurrencereglerne?
Does the Commission not believe this situation to be in breach of Community competition law?
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe for at imødegå denne situation?
What measures will the Commission take on the matter?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2139/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2139/09
Om: Hovedtelefoner til iPod Shuffle og sundhedsrisici
Subject: iPod Shuffle headphones and health risks
Efter den store succes af deres første musikafspiller har virksomheden Apple besluttet at introducere en ny model af iPod Shuffle på markedet, som er endnu mindre og smallere end den første model.
In the wake of the great success of the first iPod Shuffle, Apple has decided to introduce a new model of this personal music player that is still smaller and thinner than its predecessor.
Den store nysgerrighed og de store forventninger forud for salget af det nye produkt skyldes dog de problemer, der er opstået på grund af opbygningen af den nye mp3-afspiller.
The major interest and expectation that preceded the launch of the new product have now given way to concerns about the new model's design.
Faktisk er kommandoerne ikke længere anbragt på selve apparatet, men på hovedtelefonerne.
The controls are no longer located on the player itself, but on the headphones.
Uden denne chip virker hovedtelefonerne ikke.
The iPod Shuffle will not work with headphones that are not fitted with the chip.
Det betyder, at hvis en forbruger beslutter at købe hovedtelefoner af et andet mærke, kan han eller hun ikke lytte til musik på sin nye iPod Shuffle.
This means that anyone who decides to buy another make of headphones will not be able to use them to listen to music on the new iPod Shuffle.
Denne lille transistor får os derfor til at stille følgende spørgsmål: 1.
The presence of this small transistor begs the following questions: 1.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at det er nødvendigt at kontrollere, om den nævnte chip er potentielt sundhedsskadelig for forbrugerne? 2.
Would the Commission not agree that it is important to ascertain whether the chip could pose a risk to consumer health? 2.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at det er på sin plads at udføre nogle undersøgelser for at kontrollere chippens potentielle skadevirkning?
Would it not agree that the chip should be examined by experts in order to assess its potential harmfulness?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2140/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2140/09
Om: Sældrab i Canada
Subject: Seal cull in Canada
Over en million sæler er blevet dræbt i Canada med regeringens tilladelse.
In the last few years more than a million seals have been killed in Canada with the approval of the Canadian government.
Dette massedrab er i modstrid med offentlighedens holdning og møder protester i hele verden.
This mass slaughter continues in spite of public opposition and worldwide protests.
Der slås unge dyr ihjel, som ofte kun er lidt over 10 uger gamle.
The animals killed are mostly young, sometimes only a few weeks old.
Der anvendes bl.a. stave til at slå dyrene ihjel med.
Often they are clubbed to death.
Mange af dyrene er stadig i live, når de pelses.
Many of the animals are still alive when their fur is removed.
Polen er en af de største importører af sælskind i verden, og landet bør indføre et importforbud, ligesom andre lande, herunder Belgien, Tyskland, Italien og Nederlandene, har gjort det eller har til hensigt at gøre det.
Poland, one of the world’s biggest importers of seal furs, should ban their import following the example of other European countries that have done so or intend to, such as Belgium, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands.
Hvilke skridt tager Kommissionen for at standse denne barbariske adfærd?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to put an end to this barbaric practice?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2141/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2141/09
Om: Forlængelse af Tangeværkets driftstilladelser og manglende miljøvurdering
Subject: Renewal of the Tange plant's operating licences and lack of environmental impact assessment
Den 24. november 2008 modtog Kommission en klage fra Danmarks Sportsfiskerforbund angående Danmarks overtrædelse af fællesskabslovgivningen i forbindelse med forlængelse af GudenaaCentralens koncession.
On 24 November 2008, the Commission received a complaint from Danmarks Sportsfiskerforbund (the Danish Anglers Association) concerning Denmark's infringement of Community legislation in connection with the renewal of the River Guden plant's licence.
Klageren fremhæver, at de gentagne forlængelser/fornyelser af loven (lov nr. 182 af 20. marts 1918, der tillader opdæmning af Gudenåen med henblik på elektricitetsproduktion) er blevet vedtaget, uden at der har været gennemført de miljøvurderinger, der kræves i henhold til EU's regler om miljøbeskyttelse.
The Association maintains that the repeated extensions/renewals of the law (Law No 182 of 20 March 1918, which authorises the damming of the River Guden for electricity production) have been granted without carrying out the environmental impact assessments required by EU environmental protection rules.
Klagen er registreret i Kommissionen under sagsnummer SG/CDC(2008)A/8785, og er til dato endnu ikke blevet besvaret.
The complaint has been registered with the Commission under case number SG/CDC(2008)A/8785 and has not yet been answered.
Jeg vil hermed gerne spørge Kommissionen, hvornår Kommissionen forventer at være færdig med behandlingen af sagen og herunder, hvornår klageren kan forvente svar på sin henvendelse.
I would hereby ask the Commission when it expects to have completed consideration of the matter and when the Association can expect an answer to its complaint.
Opmærksomheden henledes også på EF-Domstolens afgørelse i sag C 201/02 og C 127/02, hvor det bl.a. slås fast, at fornyelse af eksisterende tilladelser sidestilles med førstegangstilladelser, samt at EU-reglerne skal anvendes direkte, uanset om reglerne er gennemført i national lovgivning.
Reference was also made to the judgment of the Court of Justice in cases C‑201/02 and C‑127/02, which establishes that renewal of existing licences is equivalent to the original granting of the licences and that EU rules are directly applicable regardless of whether the rules have been incorporated into national legislation.
Forlængelse af GudenaaCentralens koncession ved lov må i direktivets forstand sidestilles med en ny tilladelse, og da loven ikke opfylder VVM-direktivets oplysningskrav, hvilket er en betingelse for, at lovgiver kan benytte undtagelsesbestemmelsen i direktivets artikel 1, stk. 5, er der i direktivet krav om VVM-screening.
Renewal of the River Guden plant's licence by law must be regarded, within the meaning of the directive, as equivalent to a new licence and, as the law does not comply with the directive's information requirements, which is a condition of the legislator being able to apply the exemption contained in Article 1, paragraph 5, of the directive, a screening process must be carried out in accordance with the directive.
En sådan screening er jf. ovennævnte klage ikke blevet foretaget ved lovens vedtagelse i december 2007.
According to the abovementioned complaint, such a screening process was not carried out when the law was adopted in December 2007.
I forlængelse heraf vil jeg bede Kommissionen om en vurdering af, hvorvidt ovennævnte lovændring i 2007 opfylder henholdsvis de nævnte krav i VVM-direktivet samt de yderligere miljøkrav, som klageren i denne sag har henvist til.
Will the Commission carry out an assessment of whether the abovementioned amendment of the law in 2007 is consistent with the requirements of Directive 85/337/EC and the other environmental requirements to which the complainant in this case has referred?
(26. maj 2009)
(26 May 2009)
Kommissionen kan bekræfte, at den klage, der omtales i forespørgslen, rent faktisk er modtaget i Kommissionen.
The Commission can confirm that the complaint to which is referred in the question has indeed been received in the Commission.
Under vurderingen af klagen har Kommissionens tjenestegrene fastslået, at visse elementer skal afklares med klageren, inden der kan foretages en vurdering af selve klagens indhold.
During the assessment of the complaint, the Commission services have established that a certain number of elements need to be clarified with the complainant before an assessment of the substance in the complaint can be carried out.
Kommissionens tjenestegrene er ved at udarbejde et brev, hvori de udbeder sig den fornødne afklaring, som meget snart vil blive sendt til klageren.
The Commission services are currently preparing a letter, asking for the necessary clarifications, which will be sent to the complainant very shortly.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2142/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2142/09
Om: Bæredygtighedsvurderinger for handelsaftaler med Centralamerika
Subject: Sustainability impact assessment for trade agreement with Central America
Ifølge Kommissionen forventes forhandlingerne om en associeringsaftale mellem EU og Centralamerika afsluttet i maj i år.
According to the Commission, the negotiations for an association agreement between the EU and Central America are expected to be finalised in May this year.
Bæredygtighedsvurderingen, der udføres inden for rammerne af samhandelsdelen i denne aftale, er påbegyndt for nylig, og ifølge tidsplanen vil den endelige rapport om bæredygtighedsvurderingen blive fremlagt i august.
The sustainability impact assessment (SIA) process carried out within the framework of the trade pillar of the same agreement has recently started and, according to the timetable, the final report for the SIA will be presented in August.
Hvordan vil Kommissionen garantere, at der vil blive taget højde for resultaterne af bæredygtighedsvurderingen i forhandlingerne, når forhandlingerne afsluttes inden bæredygtighedsvurderingen?
How will the Commission guarantee that the findings of the SIA will be taken into account in the negotiations when negotiations are finalised before the SIA?
Vil de vigtigste resultater i bæredygtighedsvurderingsudkastet blive præsenteret for Europa-Parlamentets Udvalg om International Handel?
Will the key findings of the SIA draft report be presented to the Committee on International Trade of the European Parliament?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2143/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2143/09
Om: Begrænsning af den frie bevægelighed, trusler om fjernelse af mindreårige og politiets krænkelser af romafamilier i Pesaro, Italien
Subject: Restriction on freedom of movement, threats to remove children and abuse by police authorities against Roma families in Pesaro, Italy
Formålet skulle have været at meddele gruppen om en anmeldelse for ulovlig indtrængen på andres private ejendom, om den forestående evakuering (uden mulighed for genhusning eller social bistand), og om at alle mindreårige ville blive fjernet fra deres forældre.
The aim was apparently to serve notice on the group for having invaded a private building, to announce that they were shortly to be evicted (with no alternative accommodation or assistance offered) and to remove all children from their parents.
Politiet skulle have meddelt familierne, at børnene ville blive overdraget til de sociale myndigheder og dermed indlogeret på en offentlig institution.
The officers apparently told the families that their children would be handed over to the Social Services and then placed in a community.
Romamødrene var rædselsslagne og flygte med deres børn uden at efterlade sig spor.
The frightened Roma mothers fled with their children, never to be seen again.
Fædrene og de andre romaer ville blive tilbage uden penge og uden et sted at sove, men nogle af dem skulle have besluttet, at de ville vende hjem til Rumænien for at undgå repressalier.
The fathers and other members of the Roma community were left without a purpose or point of reference, and some of them apparently decided to return to Romania in order to avoid becoming the victims of reprisals.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2144/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2144/09
Om: Sagen om Gratian Gruia og hensynet til barnets interesse i forbindelse med tilbagesendelse
Subject: The case of Gratian Gruia and the best interest of the child with regard to repatriation
Efter at den offentlige anklager for ungdomsdomstolen fik frataget forældrene forældremyndigheden, mødte Rumænien i sagen ved domstolen i Rom og bad om at få barnet udleveret.
After the Public Prosecutor of the Juvenile Court managed to achieve the severance of the parental rights of the child's father and mother, Romania appealed to the Rome Court during the proceedings, calling for and securing the return of the child.
Især fællesskabslovgivningen tillægger ubestridt betydning til integreringen af den mindreårige i dennes nye omgivelser, da han i modsat fald udsættes for skade.
In particular, Community legislation attaches undisputed importance to the integration of the child into his or her new environment where, should this not be the case, the child would be at risk of harm.
Endelig skal det understreges, at ungdomsdomstolen i Rom i medfør af det, der er sammenholdt i artikel 1 og 5, stk. VI, i lovdekret nr. 286 af 25. juli 1998, kan give Gratian opholdsret af menneskelige hensyn eller som resultat af den italienske stats lovmæssige eller internationale forpligtelser.
It should be stressed that, under the combined provisions of Articles 1 and 5, paragraph VI of Legislative Decree No 286 of 25/7/1998, the Rome Juvenile Court could have granted Gratian the right to stay for humanitarian reasons, or for reasons stemming from the constitutional or international obligations of the Italian Government.
Således og i henhold til artikel 20, stk. VII, i lovdekret nr. 30 af 6. februar 2007 ville Gratian kun kunne fjernes fra Italien på grund af statens sikkerhed eller alvorlige/bydende nødvendige hensyn til den offentlige orden eller sikkerhed.
If that had been the case, pursuant to Article 20, paragraph VII of Legislative Decree No 30 of 6/2/07, Gratian would have been able to be removed from Italy only on grounds of state security or on imperative public safety grounds.
I lyset af ovenstående bedes Kommissionen: —
In the light of the above, could the Commission
henvise sagen til EF-Domstolen, således at denne kan afgøre, hvilke initiativer der skal fjerne de bestemmelser, der krænker barnets tarv og sætter i en situation, som påvirker dets fysiske og psykiske velbefindende og dets grundlæggende rettigheder, og anbringe barnet i egnede rammer, der kan give det en rolig opvækst og en harmonisk og velafbalanceret udvikling af sin personlighed?
refer the case to the EC Court of Justice so that it may decide on appropriate measures to quash decisions or judgments which adversely affect the best interest of children not to be exposed to situations which damage their physical and psychological well-being and their fundamental rights and to be integrated into an environment in which they can grow up serenely and their personalities can develop in a harmonious, balanced way?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2145/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2145/09
Om: Overensstemmelse med EU's lovgivning af aftalen mellem Italien og Rumænien om beskyttelse af uledsagede mindreårige
Subject: Italy-Romania agreement on protection of minors: compliance with EC law
Den bilaterale aftale, der blev undertegnet den 6. juni 2008 mellem Italien og Rumænien, om beskyttelse af uledsagede rumænske børn eller mindreårige i vanskeligheder i Italien indfører ikke et vurderingssystem til hver enkelt sag for alle de risikosituationer, disse mindreårige befinder sig i.
The bilateral agreement concluded between Italy and Romania on 6 June 2008 on the protection of Romanian minors on Italian territory who are unaccompanied or in difficulties does not provide for the case-by-case assessment of the particular circumstances of risk faced by individual children.
Aftalen fremmer nærmere en ledsaget tilbagesendelse af alle uledsagede romabørn i Italien uden at tage hensyn til alder, opholdets varighed i Italien, den eventuelle positive integration i samfundet, den mindreåriges ønske om ikke at vende tilbage, eller hvorvidt der er en egnet familie i Rumænien, som kan tage sig af barnet.
The agreement favours, instead, the assisted repatriation of all unaccompanied Romanian minors found on Italian soil, without regard for their age, how long they have been in Italy, the fact that they may be well-integrated into the community, their manifest desire not to return, or whether there is a suitable family awaiting them in Romania.
Den restriktive fortolkning af reglen ved at nægte en sådan beskyttelse af mindreårige europæere ville skabe en uretfærdig forskelsbehandling, som ikke er tilladt i henhold til lovgivningen.
To apply a restrictive interpretation of the law that denies minors who are Community nationals the right to protection appears, then, to be a case of unequal treatment and therefore unconstitutional.
I den seneste sag om den mindreårige Gratian Gruia ses desuden, hvordan den rumænske lovgivning synes at tilgodese tilbagesendelsen af barnet til den oprindelige familie, uanset at der er konstateret tidligere situationer, hvori barnet er blevet forladt, mishandlet eller udnyttet af sine familiemedlemmer.
The recent case of the minor Graţian Gruia has made it clear that the Romanian legislation tends to favour the return of the child to its family of origin, even if there is clear evidence of abandonment, mistreatment or abuse of the child by family members.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2146/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2146/09
Om: Rådets direktiv 92/58/EØF om minimumsforskrifter for signalgivning i forbindelse med sikkerhed og/eller sundhed under arbejdet
Subject: Directive 92/58/EEC (minimum requirements for the provision of safety and/or health signs at work)
Signalgivning i forbindelse med sikkerhed og/eller sundhed under arbejdet, som allerede var taget i anvendelse før den i artikel 11, stk. 1, første afsnit, anførte dato, skulle — med forbehold af bestemmelserne i artikel 6 — opfylde minimumsforskrifterne i bilag I til IX senest 18 måneder efter denne dato.
Without prejudice to Article 6, a safety and/or health sign which was already in use at work before the date referred to in Article 11(1) first subparagraph must fulfil the minimum requirements set out in Annexes I to IX by no later than 18 months after that date.
Er det muligt for Kommissionen klart at oplyse, om alle medlemsstater efterlever det ovenfor omtalte direktiv?
Can the Commission plainly state whether all Member States are complying with this directive?
Er det muligt for Kommissionen at oplyse, hvornår Europa-Parlamentet har fået forelagt den seneste rapport (om gennemførelsen af det omhandlede direktiv)?
Can the Commission say when the most recent report (on the implementation of the directive) was presented to the European Parliament?
Er det, i bekræftende fald, muligt for Kommissionen præcist at oplyse, om der er konstateret uregelmæssigheder (og i givet fald hvilke)?
If so, can the Commission state precisely whether (and, if so, in which cases) irregularities have been noted?
Er det i så fald muligt for Kommissionen også at oplyse, om den er skredet til handling over for medlemsstaterne (og i givet fald på hvilken måde)?
In that case, can the Commission also state whether (and, if so, what) action has been taken with regard to the Member States?
I henhold til direktivets artikel 9 skal den tekniske tilpasning af bilag I til og med IX foretages efter fremgangsmåden i artikel 17 i direktiv 89/391/EØF.
Under Article 9 provision is made for adaptations of a technical nature to Annexes I to IX, in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 17 of Directive 89/391/EEC.
Så vidt vides, er der ikke sket nogen tilpasning af bilagene siden vedtagelsen af direktiv 89/391/EØF.
So far as is known, the annexes have not been adapted since Directive 89/391/EEC was adopted.
Er Kommissionen enig i, at det er ønskeligt, at bilagene tilpasses hurtigst muligt set i lyset af de tekniske fremskridt og videreudviklingen af internationale forskrifter eller specifikationer — eksempelvis udviklingen af ISO-standarden om minimum 86 %'s genkendelighed?
Does the Commission agree that in relation to the technical progress achieved and the further development of international regulations or specifications — see for example development of the ISO standard regarding a minimum of 86 % being recognisable — a speedy adaptation of the annexes is desirable?
Kan Kommissionen, i bekræftende fald, angive en konkret tidsplan?
If so, can the Commission give a definite timetable?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2150/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2150/09
Om: Spaniens manglende overholdelse af bestemmelserne vedrørende beskyttelse af fugle
Subject: Failure on the part of the Spanish Government to comply with bird protection legislation
Kommissionen fastslog, at forskellige regionalregeringer i Spanien, herunder regionalregeringerne i Galicien og Catalonien, overtrådte ovennævnte direktiv, idet de ikke har udlagt et tilstrækkeligt antal og areal af områder som særligt beskyttede områder for vilde fugle.
Several of Spain’s autonomous governments, including those of Galicia and Catalonia, were deemed to be in breach of this directive, in view of the fact that the areas they have designated as special bird protection areas were neither numerous nor extensive enough.
Kan Kommissionen give oplysninger om den nuværende situation, navnlig i de selvstyrende regioner Galicien og Catalonien?
What stage have these proceedings, above all with reference to the Autonomous Communities of Galicia and Catalonia, currently reached?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2151/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2151/09
Hvornår planlægger Kommissionen at offentliggøre ændringen af gennemførelsesforordningen?
When does the Commission plan to publish the amendment of the implementing regulation in question?
Har Kommissionen kendskab til sagens hastende karakter i forhold til den vanskelige situation, som egreneringsindustrien står over for?
Is the Commission aware just how urgent this is, in view of the difficult situation the cotton-ginning industry is experiencing?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2152/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2152/09
Om: Vilkårlig udbredelse af stenbrud i O Courel
Subject: Indiscriminate proliferation of quarries in O Courel
Kommissionen har sendt en åbningsskrivelse til de spanske myndigheder vedrørende uregelmæssigheder i forbindelse med forskellige skiferbrud i distriktet O Courel (Lugo/Galicien), som indgår i Natura 2000-nettet.
The Commission has sent a written warning to the Spanish authorities about the irregularities detected in various slate-quarries located in the district of O Courel (Lugo/Galicia), an area listed as part of the Natura 2000 network; these quarries clearly fail to comply with European environmental legislation, namely Directive 85/337/EEC OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.
Der er konkret tale om følgende fire stenbrud: La Campa (der blev godkendt af den galiciske regionalregering i 2007 og fik kommunal godkendelse, men hvis tilladelse ikke længere gælder grundet alvorlige miljømæssige overtrædelser i forbindelse med aktiviteterne), Ilusión Fracción II (godkendt i 2006) samt de to stenbrud Culpa II ved floden Lors flodbækken, der påvirker lokaliteten af fællesskabsbetydning (LAF) Ancares-O Courel.
Specifically, four of these quarries are at issue: La Campa (which has had Xunta de Galicia authorisation since 2007, a preparatory measure for the granting of the municipal licence the quarry does not yet have, due to the major environmental shortcomings detected in its current operations); La Illusion Fraccion II (authorised in 2006) and the two segments of Culpa II, in the river Lor basin, which are affecting a site of community interest, namely SCI Ancares-O Courel.