natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5764/2010
Question for written answer E-5764/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Nederlandene
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in the Netherlands
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Nederlandene?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in the Netherlands?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Nederlandene, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by the Netherlands and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Nederlandene at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost the Netherlands to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5765/2010
Question for written answer E-5765/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Luxembourg
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Luxembourg
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Luxembourg?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Luxembourg?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Luxembourg, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Luxembourg and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Luxembourg at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Luxembourg to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5766/2010
Question for written answer E-5766/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Litauen
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Lithuania
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Litauen?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Lithuania?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Litauen, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Lithuania and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Litauen at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Lithuania to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5767/2010
Question for written answer E-5767/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Belgien
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Belgium
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Belgien?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Belgium?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Belgien, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Belgium and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Belgien at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Belgium to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5768/2010
Question for written answer E-5768/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Bulgarien
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Bulgaria
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Bulgarien?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Bulgaria?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Bulgarien, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Bulgaria and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Bulgarien at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Bulgaria to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5769/2010
Question for written answer E-5769/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Cypern
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Cyprus
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Cypern?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Cyprus?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Cypern, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Cyprus and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Cypern at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Cyprus to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5770/2010
Question for written answer E-5770/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Danmark
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Denmark
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Danmark?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Denmark?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Danmark, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Denmark and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Danmark at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Denmark to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5771/2010
Question for written answer E-5771/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Estland
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Estonia
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Estland?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Estonia?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Estland, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Estonia and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Estland at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Estonia to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5772/2010
Question for written answer E-5772/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Finland
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Finland
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Finland?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Finland?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Finland, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Finland and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Finland at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Finland to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5773/2010
Question for written answer E-5773/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Frankrig
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in France
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Frankrig?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in France?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Frankrig, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by France and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Frankrig at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost France to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5774/2010
Question for written answer E-5774/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Tyskland
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Germany
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Tyskland?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Germany?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Tyskland, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Germany and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Tyskland at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Germany to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5775/2010
Question for written answer E-5775/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Italien
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Italy
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Italien?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Italy?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Italien, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Italy and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Italien at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Italy to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5776/2010
Question for written answer E-5776/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Irland
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Ireland
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Irland?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Ireland?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Irland, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Ireland and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Irland at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Ireland to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5777/2010
Question for written answer E-5777/2010
Om: Sagen om H1N1‑virussen og Verdenssundhedsorganisationens rolle i Grækenland
Subject: The H1N1 virus and the role of the World Health Organisation in Greece
Er Kommissionen i stand til at oplyse, hvor mange dødsfald der officielt skyldes H1N1‑virus i Grækenland?
Can the Commission say how many deaths were officially ascribed to the H1N1 virus in Greece?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvor mange doser af vaccinen der er blevet indkøbt af Grækenland, og hvor mange doser der reelt er blevet brugt?
Can the Commission say how many doses of vaccine were purchased by Greece and how many were actually used?
Ved Kommissionen, hvad det har kostet Grækenland at indkøbe forsyningerne af vaccine?
Does the Commission know how much it cost Greece to order its stocks?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5778/2010
Question for written answer E-5778/2010
(23. juli 2010)
(23 July 2010)
Om: Vandrammedirektivets undtagelsesbestemmelser vedrørende kontinuitet
Subject: Exemptions in the Water Framework Directive concerning continuity
Her har Miljøministeriet ved bl.a. vandkraftsøen ved Storå (Holstebro) valgt at udskyde en løsning for faunapassage til næste planperiode.
In this context, the Ministry of the Environment has decided to defer finding a solution for a wildlife crossing across the hydroelectric reservoir ( Vandkraftsøen ) on the Storå (Holstebro), amongst other projects, until the next planning period.
Begrundelsen er »manglende viden om, hvilke krav EU stiller til kontinuitet ved vandkraftsøer«.
The reason given is ‘a lack of knowledge about EU requirements regarding continuity in the case of hydroelectric reservoirs’.
Begrundelsen med manglende viden om EU‑kravene gives på trods af, at det er næsten 10 år siden, vandrammedirektivet blev vedtaget.
This justification on the grounds of a lack of knowledge of EU requirements is given despite the fact that the Water Framework Directive was adopted almost 10 years ago.
Miljøstyrelsen har besluttet, at indsatsen ved Storå udskydes »i forhold til forbedring af kontinuiteten ved Holstebro Vandkraftsø, så den tidligst gennemføres i 2. planperiode (2015‑2021), hvilket giver tid til afklaring i forhold til en EU‑tolkning af begrebet »kontinuitet«, herunder rammerne for anvendelse af undtagelsesbestemmelser« (Kilde: http://www2.blst.dk/publikationer/vandplanforslag/1_4_NissumFjVand.pdf) .
The Environmental Protection Agency has decided that action regarding the Storå is deferred ‘as regards improving continuity at the Holstebro Vandkraftsø , so that this will be implemented during the second planning period (2015‑21) at the earliest, which allows time for clarification regarding the EU interpretation of the concept of “continuity”, including the framework for applying exemptions’ (Source: http://www2.blst.dk/publikationer/vandplanforslag/1_4_NissumFjVand.pdf) .
Spærringen ved Storå er en af de mest centrale spærringer for bl.a. laks i Danmark.
The barrage on the Storå is one of the main barrages for salmon, among other species, in Denmark.
I den nuværende situation går omkring ¾ af de udvandrende små, 2 år gamle laks tabt i søen.
At present, some 3/4 of migrating small 2‑year‑old salmon are lost in the reservoir.
Holstebro Vandkraftværk producerer strøm på en gennemsnitlig vandføring i Storå på beskedne 8 kubikmeter/sekund og en faldhøjde på ca. 5 metere (der produceres 2,6 mio. Kwh pr. år).
The Holstebro hydroelectric plant generates electricity from an average water flow in the Storå of a modest 8 m 3 /s and a head of around 5 metres (which generates 2.6 million kWh per annum).
Der findes både konkrete løsningsforslag for kontinuitet, der indebærer en fjernelse af søen, men også løsningsforslag, der leder Storå forbi søen.
Removing the reservoir is one specific option for ensuring continuity, but another proposed solution is to divert the Storå past the reservoir.
Finder Kommissionen, at Miljøstyrelsens begrundelse med manglende viden om EU’s krav til kontinuitet ved vandkraftsøer er gyldig, i betragtning af at det næsten er 10 år siden, at vandrammedirektivet blev vedtaget?
Does the Commission consider the Environmental Protection Agency's justification that there is a lack of knowledge of EU requirements on continuity in the case of hydroelectric reservoirs to be valid, given that almost 10 years have passed since the adoption of the Water Framework Directive?
Hvordan vægter Kommissionen i forbindelse med vandrammedirektivet hensynstagen til truede fiskearter i forhold til produktion af økonomisk set beskedne energimængder?
In the context of the Water Framework Directive, how much importance does the Commission attach to endangered fish species in comparison to energy production which, in economic terms, is of a modest scale?
Er det i strid med vandrammedirektivet, at Miljøstyrelsen endnu ikke har taget stilling til begrebet kontinuitet ved Holstebro Vandkraftsø ved Storå i Danmark, hvor det er økonomisk helt ubetydelige energimængder, der er på spil og hvor bl.a. en rødlistet og EF‑habitatbeskyttet sårbar laksebestand ( Salmo salar ), er helt afhængig af, at der etableres kontinuitet i vandløbet?
Is the Environmental Protection Agency in breach of the Water Framework Directive in not yet having taken a position on the concept of continuity in the case of the Holstebro Vandkraftsø on the Storå in Denmark, where the volume of energy production at stake is economically insignificant, but a vulnerable salmon stock ( Salmo salar ), which is on the Red List and protected by the EU Habitats Directive, is entirely dependent on the continuity of the water course being established?
Vandrammedirektivet (2000/60/EF) udgør et omfattende program til beskyttelse af overfladevand og grundvand med et mål om som en regel at opnå en god status for alle typer vand senest i 2015.
The Water Framework Directive (WFD, 2000/60/EC) establishes a comprehensive framework to protect surface and groundwater, with the aim of achieving good status of all waters as a rule by 2015.
Dette omfatter en god økologisk status og en god kemisk status.
This includes good ecological status and good chemical status.
Vandløbets kontinuitet er en del af de kvalitetsfaktorer, der afgør, hvordan den økologiske status skal klassificeres.
River continuity is part of the quality elements for the classification of ecological status.
Da vandforholdene i Europa er meget varieret, giver vandrammedirektivet medlemsstaterne en vis fleksibilitet med hensyn til valg af foranstaltninger til opfyldelse af de ambitiøse mål og anvendelse af de metoder, der bedst passer til de specifikke regioner.
The WFD leaves flexibility to the Member States to make the best selection of measures to achieve its ambitious objectives, and to apply methods that fit in their specific region as the hydrological reality in Europe is very diverse.
Der er i Europa mange gode eksempler på, hvordan der ved hjælp af vandkraftreserver kan sikres kontinuitet i vandløbet.
However, there are many good practices in Europe on river continuity in the case of hydroelectric reservoirs.
Disse eksempler kan fx findes i et dokument om casestudier og bedste praksis fra 2006, der er offentliggjort under den fælles gennemførelsesstrategi for rammedirektivet http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/wfd/library?l=/framework_directive/thematic_documents/hydromorphology&vm=detailed&sb=Title og udarbejdet sammen med medlemsstaterne.
Such good practices are for example laid down in a case study and good practice document under the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/wfd/library?l=/framework_directive/thematic_documents/hydromorphology&vm=detailed&sb=Title from 2006 developed together with the Member States.
Vandrammedirektivet tillader, at den eksisterende elproduktion fortsætter, og at der bygges nye vandkraftanlæg.
The Water Framework Directive allows for power generation to continue to take place and for building new facilities for hydropower.
Men i disse tilfælde skal visse strenge krav være opfyldt.
However, some strict conditions have to be met in these cases.
Med hensyn til eksisterende vandreservoirer kan vandområdet blandt andet blive udpeget som stærkt modificeret vandområde, hvis de nyttige mål, der tilsigtes ved de modificerede karakteristika af vandområdet, ikke med rimelighed kan opnås med andre midler, som miljømæssigt er en væsentlig bedre løsning (vandrammedirektivet, artikel 4, stk. 3).
In the case of existing reservoirs, the water body can be designated as heavily modified water body, inter alia , if the beneficial objective served by the modified characteristics cannot reasonably be achieved by other means, which are a significantly better option (WFD Article 4(3)).
Medlemsstaterne skal vurdere, om der findes andre midler i forhold til nytten ved vandanvendelse fx elproduktion.
It is for the Member State to assess the existence of other means in the light of the importance of the benefits of the water use, e.g. power generation.
For stærkt modificerede vandområder er målet at opnå et godt økologisk potentiale i stedet for en god økologisk status.
For such heavily modified water bodies, the objective is to reach good ecological potential instead of good ecological status.
I mange tilfælde kan dette potentiale kun realiseres ved, at der træffes tilstrækkelige genopretningsforanstaltninger.
In many cases, this potential can only be reached by taking sufficient restoration measures.
I henhold til artikel 4, stk. 4, i vandrammedirektivet kan medlemsstaterne kun forlænge fristerne for opfyldelse af målene, hvis mindst en af følgende betingelser er opfyldt: a) det er ikke teknisk muligt at opfylde målene inden for tidsplanen, b) der er forholdsmæssigt store omkostninger forbundet med en færdiggørelse inden for tidsplanen, eller c) de naturlige forhold muliggør ikke en rettidig forbedring af vandforekomstens tilstand.
According to Article 4(4) of the WFD, Member States may only delay the achievement of the objectives if at least one of these conditions is fulfilled: (a) it is not technically feasible to achieve the objectives within the planning period, (b) making the improvements in the timescale would be disproportionately expensive, or (c) the natural conditions do not allow timely improvement of the status of the water body.
Årsagerne til udskydelsen af fristerne for opfyldelse af målene i henhold til ovennævnte betingelser skal klart fremgå af vandområdeplanerne.
Justifications for delaying the achievement of the objectives according to the conditions mentioned above have to be clearly set out in the River Basin Management Plans.
Hvad angår nye udviklinger er en af vandrammedirektivets vigtige miljømål at forebygge en forringelse af tilstanden for vandområder (artikel 4, stk. 1, litra a), punkt i) og artikel 4, stk. 1, litra b), punkt i).
As regards new developments, one important environmental objective of the Water Framework Directive is to prevent deterioration of the status of water bodies (Article 4(1)a(i) and 4(1)b(i)).
Nye projekter, der med sandsynlighed forringer et vandområdes status, er kun tilladte, hvis de opfylder de strenge krav, der er fastsat i vandrammedirektivets artikel 4, stk. 7, 8 og 9.
New projects that are likely to cause deterioration of status are only allowed if they fulfil the strict conditions set out in the Water Framework Directive Article 4 paragraphs (7), (8) and (9).
Kommission foretager for tiden en vurdering af de indberettede vandrammeplaner, og resultatet af disse vurderinger vil blive medtaget i den tredje rapport om gennemførelsen af vandrammedirektivet i 2012.
The Commission is currently assessing the River Basin Management Plans which have been reported, and the outcome of this assessment will be included in the third report on the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in 2012.
Kommissionen vil være særlig opmærksom på anvendelsen af fritagelser og begrundelserne herfor.
In this process, the Commission will pay particular attention to the use of exemptions and the related justifications.
Udpegelsen af stærkt modificerede vandområder og anvendelsen af tilstrækkelige genopretningsforanstaltninger i tilfælde af forstyrrelser i vandløbenes kontinuitet vil også blive vurderet i detaljer.
The designation of heavily modified water bodies and the uptake of sufficient restoration measures in case of river continuity disruptions will also be assessed in detail.
Den 3. juni 2010 Se IP/10/685 af 3.6.2010. sendte Kommissionen en åbningsskrivelse til Danmark for ikke at have fremsendt vandområdeplanerne til Kommissionen i henhold til artikel 15, stk. 3, i vandrammedirektivet.
On 3 June 2010 See IP/10/685 of 3.6.2010. the Commission sent a letter of formal notice to Denmark for not submitting adopted River Basin Management Plans to the Commission in accordance with Article 15.3 of the WFD.
Når Kommissionen modtager de danske vandområdeplaner, vil den undersøge disse nøje.
Once the Commission will receive the Danish river basin management plans, it will carefully scrutinise these plans.
På dette stadium kan Kommissionen ikke tage stilling til situationen i Danmark med hensyn til begrebet kontinuitet.
At this stage it is not possible for the Commission to take a position on the concept of continuity in Denmark.