natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EUMC's islamofobiundersøgelse udviser en skrigende mangel på videnskabelig metode.
The EUMC's study of islamophobia displays a shocking lack of scientific methodology.
Objektet, islamofobien, der formodes at eksistere, defineres ikke.
The subject of the study, the islamophobia which allegedly exists, is not defined.
Der drages konklusioner på grundlag af modstridende, ufuldstændige og til tider ikke-eksisterende data og fakta.
Conclusions are drawn on the basis of contradictory, incomplete and in some cases non-existent statistics and facts.
De muslimer, der er udvalgt til de dyberegående interviews, er ikke repræsentative, og dette indrømmes endog åbent.
The Muslims selected for the in-depth interviews were not representative, and indeed this is freely admitted.
Intetsteds dokumenterer rapporten, at der effektivt er tale om en stigning i antallet af hændelser, der kan karakteriseres som islamofobi.
At no point does the report demonstrate that the number of incidents which can be attributed to islamophobia really is growing.
At muslimerne i Europa kan opleve problemer, er et faktum, men der er for det meste tale om enkeltstående hændelser.
Muslims may experience problems in Europe — that is a fact — but on the whole these are isolated incidents.
Det kan på ingen måde sammenlignes med den måde, hvorpå de muslimske lande behandler religiøse mindretalsgrupper.
They cannot possibly be compared with the way in which Islamic countries treat religious minorities.
På grundlag af EUMC-undersøgelsen overtog mange dagblade kritikløst beretningen om, at muslimerne i Europa diskrimineres systematisk og storstilet.
When the EUMC study was published, many newspapers uncritically reported the finding that Muslims in Europe were suffering systematic discrimination on a large scale.
Er Kommissionen ikke bekymret over den alvorlige fare for, at det eneste resultat af sådanne rapporter er, at muslimerne i endnu højere grad bekræftes i deres offerrolle, end det allerede nu er tilfældet?
Is the Commission concerned about the serious possibility that the only result of such reports may be to provide Muslims with yet further confirmation of the sense of victimhood which many of them already feel?
Overvejer Kommissionen — eventuelt i samarbejde med EUMC — at tilskynde muslimerne til selvbetragtning og selvkritik?
Will the Commission — perhaps in cooperation with the EUMC — encourage Muslims to engage in such practices as introspection and self-criticism?
Problemer som undertrykkelse af kvinderne og mangel på fortrolighed med principper som fri meningsytring er jo årsag til mange af muslimernes problemer.
Problems such as the repression of women and a lack of familiarity with such concepts as freedom of expression are to blame for many of the problems experienced by Muslims.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1103/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1103/07
Om: EUMC's rapport om islamofobi — kostpris
Subject: Cost of EUMC study of islamophobia
Det Europæiske Observatorium for Racisme og Fremmedhad (EUMC) offentliggjorde den 18. december rapporten »Muslimer i Den Europæiske Union: Diskrimination og islamofobi«.
On 18 December the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) published the report ‘Muslims in the European Union: discrimination and islamophobia’.
Hvad har denne undersøgelse kostet?
How much did this study cost?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1104/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1104/07
Om: Den anvendte metode i EUMC's rapport om islamofobi
Subject: Methodology used in EUMC report on islamophobia
Rapporten »Muslimer i Den Europæiske Union: Diskrimination og islamofobi« fra Det Europæiske Observatorium for Racisme og Fremmedhad (EUMC) indeholder en række mærkværdigheder, for så vidt angår den anvendte metode.
The methodology used in the report ‘Muslims in the European Union: discrimination and islamophobia’ by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) displays a number of bizarre features.
For det første definerer EUMC ikke begrebet »islamofobi«.
Firstly, the EUMC does not manage to define ‘islamophobia’.
Mærkværdigvis tager man først dette følsomme spørgsmål op midt i rapporten.
Indeed, it is not until halfway through the report that this thorny issue is even broached.
Forfatterne skriver, at der foreligger meget få data om såvel muslimernes demografiske situation i Den Europæiske Union som om den diskrimination, de hævdes at være udsat for.
The report's authors themselves write that too few statistics are available concerning both the demographic situation of Muslims in the European Union and the discrimination to which they are exposed.
Alene dette forhold burde mane til forsigtighed, når der drages konklusioner, men det generer ikke forfatterne.
This fact alone should be sufficient to warrant a certain caution in drawing general conclusions, but this proves to be no stumbling block.
Der henvises til meningsmålinger, der giver divergerende resultater.
Reference is made to opinion polls with contradictory findings.
Der citeres mange forhold, der har ringe vægt eller er vanskelige at kontrollere, ikke mindst fordi de stammer fra »uofficielle kilder«.
Many facts are cited which carry little weight or are difficult to verify, partly because they are derived from ‘unofficial sources’.
Dette rejser nogle spørgsmål om de udvalgte personers repræsentativitet.
This raises questions about the representativeness of the interviewees.
EUMC indrømmer dog åbent, at disse interviews ikke er tilstrækkeligt repræsentative for meningen blandt muslimerne i Den Europæiske Union.
Indeed, the EUMC freely admits that the interviews are not necessarily representative of Muslim opinion in the European Union.
Neutrale muslimer er ikke blevet spurgt, kun personer, der er engageret i interesseorganisationer, og som med henblik på deres tilskud har stor interesse i at fremstille forholdene så negativt som muligt.
No Muslims without organisational attachments were interviewed: only people who were active in interest groups and who would therefore have an interest in portraying the situation as negatively as possible for the sake of their subsidies.
Hele denne undersøgelse af opfattelser er derfor yderst subjektiv.
The whole perception survey is therefore extremely subjective.
Mener Kommissionen, at EUMC's rapport om islamofobi er udarbejdet på et videnskabeligt ansvarligt grundlag?
Was the EUMC's islamophobia study carried out in a scholarly way?
Hvilke foranstaltninger overvejer Kommissionen for at hindre, at der atter udføres så sjusket arbejde?
What steps is the Commission considering in order to prevent any repetition of such sloppy work?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1105/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1105/07
Om: Forhandlinger med Tyrkiet om de kapitler, der er lagt på is
Subject: Negotiations with Turkey on frozen chapters
I »European Voice« af 22. februar udtaler den tyrkiske hovedforhandler med Den Europæiske Union, Ali Babacan, at det i december blev besluttet at lægge otte kapitler »på is«, men at det »tekniske arbejde« fortsættes.
In the 22 February issue of European Voice , Ali Babacan, Turkey's chief negotiator with the European Union, states that it was decided in December that eight chapters should be ‘frozen’, but that in the meantime the ‘technical work’ was continuing.
Forhandler Kommissionen videre med Tyrkiet »på teknisk plan« om de kapitler, der er lagt på is?
Is the Commission continuing to negotiate with Turkey at a ‘technical level’ on the frozen chapters?
Hvad indgår i bekræftende fald i dette »tekniske arbejde«?
If so, what does this ‘technical work’ comprise?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1106/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1106/07
Om: Veje finansieret med EU-­midler
Subject: Roads financed by EU funds
Er Kommissionen klar over, at et antal nye veje, der finansieres med EU-­midler på Malta, vil ødelægge landbrugsarealer i Pwales og Ghadira?
Is the Commission aware that a number of new roads being financed by EU funds in Malta will destroy agricultural land in the Pwales and Ghadira areas?
Er Kommissionen klar over, at de landbrugere, der arbejder på de pågældende landbrugsarealer, er blevet opfordret til at investere i nye teknologier og produkter ved hjælp af EU-­midler?
Is the Commission aware that farmers working this land had been encouraged to invest in new technologies and products by means of EU funds?
Vil Kommissionen kræve gennemførelse af de nødvendige miljøkonsekvensundersøgelser for at sikre, at den ikke yder støtte til ødelæggelse af landbrugsjord, som der er knaphed på?
Will the Commission require the necessary environmental impact assessments to be carried out, in order to make sure that it does not finance the destruction of scarce agricultural land?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1107/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1107/07
Om: Bæredygtigheden af lufthavnen i Ota
Subject: Viability of Ota airport (Portugal)
Ifølge medierne er den portugisiske ingeniørsammenslutning »ikke overbevist« om det hensigtsmæssige i at opføre en ny lufthavn i Ota og opfordrer derfor de portugisiske myndigheder til at undersøge alternativer.
According to media reports, the Portuguese Order of Engineers is ‘not convinced’ concerning the planned construction of a new airport at Ota (Lisbon), and has advised the government to examine alternatives.
Sammenslutningens formand undrer sig over, at der på tidspunktet for afgørelsen om opførelse af en ny lufthavn kun angives to mulige placeringer: Rio Frio, der er udelukket af miljøhensyn, og Ota, som vil være overbelastet om 30 til 40 år. »Der findes andre løsninger, og det havde jeg gerne set præsenteret af dem, der beskæftiger sig med disse spørgsmål,« udtalte han.
The president of the Order, Fernando Santo, has expressed his surprise that the decision to build a new airport has taken account of only two alternatives: Rio Frio (rejected on environmental ground) and Ota, which will be saturated in 30 to 40 years' time.
Han nærer dog tillid til, at regeringen vil udvise »sund fornuft« og tage spørgsmålet op til fornyet behandling.
He stated: ‘There are other possible options which I believe that those responsible should look at’, while hoping that the government will follow the path of ‘common sense’ and reopen the dossier.
Kommissionen bedes derfor besvare følgende: —
Can the Commission therefore answer the following questions: —
vil der blive ydet EU-­finansiering til lufthavnen i Ota?
Will the Ota airport receive EU funding?
Hvilket beløb er der i bekræftende fald tale om, og hvor stor en procentdel udgør den af de samlede investeringer? —
If so, how much will it be, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of the total value of the investment? —
hvilke undersøgelser af behovet for og bæredygtigheden af opførelsen af lufthavnen i Ota har de portugisiske myndigheder forelagt for Kommissionen? —
What studies concerning the necessity and viability of building an airport at Ota, and its sustainability, have been forwarded to the Commission by the Portuguese Government? —
anser Kommissionen disse oplysninger for at være fyldestgørende? —
Is the Commission satisfied with that information? —
hvilke af de indsendte oplysninger var afgørende for afgørelsen om at deltage i finansieringen af projektet? —
What elements of the material supplied were found essential in any decision to co‑finance the project? —
har Kommissionen kendskab til alternativerne, navnlig til dem, som gør det muligt at anvende de eksisterende ressourcer optimalt? —
Is the Commission aware of any alternative schemes, especially those which might make it possible to optimise the existing resources? —
er de portugisiske myndigheder blevet orienteret om de konsekvenser, som opførelsen af lufthavnen i Ota vil få for de øvrige portugisiske lufthavne med hensyn til trafik og økonomisk bæredygtighed?
Has the Commission been informed by the Portuguese Government concerning the impact of building the Ota airport on Portugal's other airports, in terms of traffic and economic viability?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1109/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1109/07
Om: Flyvesikkerheden i Cypern-området
Subject: Safety of flights in the region of Cyprus
Rådet erklærede i sit svar på min forespørgsel E-­5632/­06, at spørgsmålet om »piratflyvninger« til den besatte del af Cypern »ikke henhørte under Rådets kompetenceområde«.
In its answer to my Question E‑5632/06, the Council states that the matter of ‘pirate’ flights to the occupied territories of Cyprus ‘does not fall within its sphere of competence’.
Kan jeg deraf konkludere, at Rådet er ligeglad med, om der måske sker en alvorlig flyulykke i området?
May I conclude from that statement that the Council is not concerned whether a serious accident occurs in the region?
Vil det sige, at Rådet og de regeringer, som det består af, hidtil aldrig har bekymret sig om flyvesikkerheden i EU?
May I conclude that neither the Council nor its member governments have ever hitherto concerned themselves with the safety of flights in the EU?
I henhold til EU-­lovgivningen reguleres flyvninger på nationalt plan af medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder.
Under European Community law, flight operations are regulated at national level by the competent authorities of the Member States.
Europa-Kommissionen har til opgave at sikre, at sådan regulering sker i overensstemmelse med fællesskabslovgivningen, herunder ethvert aspekt i forbindelse med internationale forpligtelser.
The European Commission has the task of ensuring that such regulation is carried out in accordance with Community law, including any aspects thereof that arise from international obligations.
Kommissionen har bemyndigelse til at træffe hensigtsmæssige foranstaltninger, herunder retsforfølgning, for at sikre, at EU-­lovgivningen anvendes korrekt på dette område.
The Commission is empowered to take appropriate action, including legal action, to ensure that Community law is properly applied in this area.
På denne baggrund er Rådet ikke den passende instans til at overvåge flyvninger i EU.
In view of this, the Council is not the appropriate body to monitor flights in the EU.
EU-­optræden med hensyn til specifikke flyvesikkerhedsforanstaltninger, der gælder i området, er også Kommissionens ansvar.
Community action with respect to specific aviation safety measures applicable in the region is also the responsibility of the Commission.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1110/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1110/07
af Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou (PPE-DE)
by Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou (PPE‑DE)
(8. marts 2007)
(8 March 2007)
Om: Kommunikation på modersmålet
Subject: Communication in the mother tongue
Det konstateres ligeledes, at medlemsstaterne, hvad angår migrantarbejdstagere inden for Den Europæiske Union, ikke værdsætter den kapital, som modersmålet repræsenterer, selvom det er et af de anerkendte officielle sprog.
It also notes that the Member States do not exploit the capital offered by the mother tongue of migrant workers in the European Union, even where that language is one of the recognised official languages.
Hvilke foranstaltninger planlægger Kommissionen på baggrund af disse omstændigheder at træffe for at lægge pres på medlemsstaterne for at prioritere kendskabet til et officielt europæisk sprog, som migrantarbejdstagere og deres børn allerede behersker og taler?
Given this situation, what steps will the Commission take to persuade the Member States to exploit the potential offered by knowledge of an official European language that is already mastered and spoken by migrant workers and their children?
Råder Kommissionen over statistikker over den indsats, der hidtil er gjort for at fremme migrantarbejdstageres uddannelse i modersmålet i EU-­medlemsstaterne, og finansieringen heraf?
Does the Commission have any statistics on the efforts made to date to promote teaching of the mother tongue for European migrant workers in EU Member States and on funding for such measures?
Omfatter bestræbelserne i forbindelse med programmer for livslang læring foranstaltninger for undervisning og styrkelse af indlæringen af modersmålet for de europæere, der lever i en anden EU-­medlemsstat?
Do the actions planned as part of the lifelong learning programme include measures to teach and boost the learning of the mother tongue for Europeans living in another EU Member State?
Hvem skal være de eventuelle partnere i forbindelse med kommende udformning af sådanne bestræbelser?
What possible partners can be envisaged with a view to launching such actions in the future?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1111/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1111/07
Om: Forbud mod slør
Subject: Banning the veil
Under henvisning til udtalelser om at kvinder, der bærer heldækkende slør, er en »udfordring af de europæiske værdier«, »et tegn på adskillelsen fra og stik imod den centrale europæiske kultur« og en »integrationshindring«, hvilket skader muslimer, fordi det »opfordrer til chikane«, og at koranen intet siger om, at det er ønskværdigt endsige obligatorisk, at kvinder bærer nikab, og at det er et tegn på, at kvinden er underkastet manden, vil Kommissionen da opfordre medlemsstaterne til at organisere en kampagne, for at få kvinder til at ophøre med at bære det?
Given that the wearing of the full face veil by Muslim women in Member States is a ‘defiance’ of European values, ‘a mark of separation and defiance against mainstream’ European culture, and a ‘barrier to integration’, which brings harm to Muslims because it ‘invites harassment’, and that there is nothing in the Koran to say that the wearing of the niqab is desirable, let alone compulsory, and that it is a sign of women’s subjection to men, will the Commission encourage Member States to campaign to stop women wearing it?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1112/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1112/07
Om: Lukning af virksomheden Delphi i Puerto Real, Cádiz
Subject: Closure of the Delphi undertaking in Puerto Real, Cádiz
Sidste uge oplyste den multinationale virksomhed Delphi Automotive Systems Holding Inc., at den ville lukke sit anlæg i Puerto Real i Cádiz, hvad der ville medføre, at 1 600 direkte arbejdstagere og over 2 500 indirekte arbejdstagere ville miste deres arbejde.
Last week the multinational Delphi Automotive Systems Holding Inc. announced the closure of its plant in Puerto Real, Cádiz, with a loss of 1600 direct jobs and more than 2500 indirect jobs.
Lukningen af fabrikken Delphi Automotive España SL er en overtrædelse af arbejdstagernes sociale rettigheder, det er en åbenlys tilsidesættelse af den spanske arbejdsmarkedslovgivning og af virksomhedens egne tilsagn, som er indeholdt i den forretningsplan, der blev undertegnet i 2005, og som indeholdt en beskæftigelsesgaranti frem til 2010 for de 1 600 ansatte på fabrikken i Puerto Real.
As well as constituting an attack on the social rights of workers, the closure of the Delphi Automotive España SL factory represents a flagrant violation of both Spanish labour law and the undertaking's own commitments as agreed in the industrial plan signed in 2005, which guaranteed employment for all 1600 workers at the Puerto Real plant until 2010.
Det skal fremhæves, at virksomheden fra forskellige offentlige myndigheder havde fået udbetalt over 25 mio. EUR med henblik på at sikre de ansattes arbejdspladser.
It should be pointed out that the undertaking had received more than EUR 25 million from various public administrations in order to guarantee its workers' jobs.
Har den kendskab til lukningen af virksomheden Delphi Automotive España SL? —
Is the Commission aware of the closure of the undertaking Delphi Automotive España SL? —
Har den oplysninger om den støtte, der er blevet udbetalt til Delphi Automotive España SL fra de spanske myndigheders side? —
Did the Commission have any information on the aid granted to Delphi Automotive España SL by the Spanish authorities? —
Kan den oplyse, om en del af midlerne stammer fra EU? —
Can the Commission say whether any part of this aid came from European funds? —
Er Kommissionen ikke af den opfattelse, at Delphi Automotive España SL bør tilbagebetale den støtte, den har modtaget fra de spanske myndigheder og eventuelt også fra EU, idet virksomheden ikke har overholdt de tilsagn, som den havde afgivet? —
Does the Commission not take the view that Delphi Automotive España SL should repay the aid granted by the Spanish authorities, possibly from European funds, owing to the failure to honour the commitments given by the undertaking? —
Hvilke skridt vil Kommissionen tage i samarbejde med de ansvarlige spanske myndigheder for at sikre den korrekte anvendelse af fællesskabsbestemmelserne om kollektive afskedigelser og beskyttelse af arbejdstagernes rettigheder og for at pålægge denne multinationale virksomhed at overholde de tilsagn, som den afgav i sin forretningsplan for 2005?
What steps will the Commission take, together with the competent Spanish authorities, in order to guarantee the correct application of Community legislation on collective redundancies and the protection of workers' rights, and in order to ensure that the multinational complies with the commitments given in the 2005 industrial plan?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1113/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1113/07
Om: Fysiske overgreb foretaget af formodede nynazistiske grupper i Terrassa (Spanien)
Subject: Attacks by alleged neo-Nazi groups in Terrassa (Spain)
Lørdag den 17. februar 2007 blev fire unge tilhørende forskellige venstreorienterede ungdomsorganisationer i Terrassa i Spanien udsat for fysiske overgreb fra formodede fascistiske grupper.
During the night of Saturday, 17 February 2007 four youths belonging to various left-wing youth organisations in Terrassa (Spain) were attacked by alleged fascist groups.
Som et resultat af overfaldet måtte de fire unge behandles på skadestuen, og en af dem er fortsat indlagt på grund af de alvorlige kvæstelser, han pådrog sig.
As a result of the attacks, the four youths had to be treated in casualty and one of them remains in hospital owing to the serious injuries he received.
Desværre forekommer denne form for overgreb regelmæssigt i Terrassa og andre byer i området.
Unfortunately, attacks of this kind occur on a regular basis in Terrassa and other towns and cities in the area.
Det er på denne baggrund nødvendigt, at alle — borgere, partier og institutioner — gør en fælles indsats for at stoppe disse voldshandlinger, som er en krænkelse af friheden og demokratiet.
Such a situation makes it necessary for all of us, as citizens, parties and institutions, to unite in our efforts to eradicate these violent acts which constitute an assault against freedom and democracy.
Har den kendskab til de omtalte overgreb? —
Is the Commission aware of the above attacks? —
Hvordan ser den på denne form for voldshandlinger? —
How does the Commission assess this type of violent act? —
Agter den at anmode de kompetente myndigheder om at efterforske denne sag? —
Will the Commission ask the competent authorities to investigate this case? —
Hvilken form for foranstaltninger eller planer har Kommissionen iværksat eller påtænker den at iværksætte for at hindre, at der på ny finder sådanne overgreb udført af formodede nynazistiske grupper sted?
What type of actions or plans has the Commission launched or will it launch in order to prevent this type of attack by alleged neo-Nazi groups?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1114/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1114/07
Om: Tvungen forsvinding
Subject: Enforced disappearance
Hvilke retningslinjer eller hvilken fælles strategi eller fælles holdning har Rådet udarbejdet med henblik på at sikre, at alle medlemsstater underskriver den internationale konvention om beskyttelse af alle personer mod tvungen forsvinding?
What is the Council doing by way of guidelines, common strategy or common position to ensure that all Member States sign the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance?
Hvilken grund kan en medlemsstat have for ikke at ville sikre, at »tvungne forsvindinger er en strafbar handling i henhold til national ret«, eller at »tvungne forsvindinger er en forbrydelse mod menneskeheden«?
What would be the reason that any Member State would not want to ‘ensure that enforced disappearances constitute an offence under domestic law’ or consider enforced disappearances a crime against humanity?