natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
De kommunale myndigheder i Azzano Decimo (Pordenone) har for nylig vedtaget en vedtægt (nr. 10 af 9. april 2008), hvorefter EU-borgere og tredjelandsstatsborgere, som er i økonomiske vanskeligheder, ikke er berettigede til »grundydelsen« (en social og økonomisk støtteforanstaltning, som skal forhindre og bekæmpe social udstødelse, og som er fastsat i Friuli Venezia Giulias regionallov nr. 6/2006).
The municipal authorities in Azzano Decimo (Pordenone) have recently passed a by-law (No 10 of 9 April 2008) pursuant to which EU and non-EU citizens who are in financial difficulties are not entitled to the ‘basic citizens' income’ (a social- and financial-support measure designed to prevent and combat social exclusion and established by means of Friuli Venezia Giulia Regional Law No 6/2006).
Formålet med loven er (i overensstemmelse med de beføjelser og ansvarsområder, der er fastsat i italiensk ret) at sikre, at alle grupper af begunstigede modtager en »overlevelsesindkomst« (dvs. en række sociale ydelser).
The purpose of that law is to ensure (in accordance with the structure of powers and responsibilities laid down in Italian law) that all categories of beneficiaries receive a ‘survival income’ (i.e. a certain range of social services and welfare benefits).
Disse grupper omfatter udlændinge med lovlig bopæl i det regionale område inden for rammerne af italiensk ret.
Those categories include foreigners legally resident on regional territory within the meaning of Italian law.
Er Kommissionen ikke enig i, at vedtægten vedtaget af Azzanos kommunale myndigheder udgør en form for forskelsbehandling, der er i strid med traktaternes ånd, navnlig EF-traktatens artikel 12, EU-traktatens artikel 6 og Fællesskabets lovgivning om bekæmpelse af forskelsbehandling (f.eks. direktiv 2000/78/EF)?
Does the Commission not agree that the by-law passed by the Azzano municipal authorities constitutes a form of discrimination contrary to the spirit of the treaties, in particular Article 12 of the EC Treaty, Article 6 of the EU Treaty and Community anti-discrimination law (e.g. Directive 2000/78/EC)?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at den pågældende vedtægt udgør en tilsidesættelse af artikel 34, stk. 2 og 3, i chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder?
Does the Commission not consider that the by-law in question infringes Articles 34.2 and 34.3 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at tilbageholdelse af en social ydelse er en overtrædelse af artikel 24 i direktiv 2004/38/EF om unionsborgeres mobilitet og direktiv 2003/109/EF om fastboende udlændinge (navnlig artikel 11, litra d))?
Does the Commission not consider that withholding a welfare benefit infringes Article 24 of Directive 2004/38/EC on the mobility of Community citizens and Directive 2003/109/EC on long-term residents (in particular Article 11(d))?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2375/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2375/08
Om: Nyt forgasningsanlæg i Malagrotta (Rom) — overholdelse af Seveso II-direktivet
Subject: New gassifier in Malagrotta (Rome) — compliance with the Seveso II Directive
I Malagrotta- og Ponte Galeria-området er der et industrikompleks, som aldrig har været underkastet hverken en risikoanalyse eller en integreret sikkerhedsrapport i henhold til Seveso II-direktivet (96/82/EF).
In the Malagrotta and Ponte Galeria area there is a complex of industrial plants which have never been subjected either to a risk analysis or to an integrated safety report pursuant to the Seveso II Directive (96/82(EC).
Komplekset omfatter et raffinaderi, to brændstofdepoter, et cementværk, en bitumenfabrik, to gasdepoter, et forbrændingsanlæg til hospitalsaffald og en losseplads, hvis udvidelse allerede er godkendt og udført i henhold til bekendtgørelse nr. 14 og 16 af 25. marts 2005, uden hensyntagen til de omstridte miljøkonsekvensvurderinger, som regionalregeringen i Lazio vedtog den 24. marts 2005 til trods for den lokale myndigheds anmodninger af 22. december 2003 og 6. december 2004 om en nærmere undersøgelse af sagen.
The complex includes a refinery, two fuel storage depots, a cement works, a bitumen factory, two gas storage depots, an incinerator for hospital waste and a rubbish dump, enlargement of which has already been authorised and carried out pursuant to Orders 14 and 16 of 25 March 2005, disregarding the controversial environmental-impact assessments adopted on 24 March 2005 by the Lazio regional government in spite of the local authority's requests of 22 December 2003 and 6 December 2004 for the matter to be studied in greater depth.
Roms kommunale myndigheder opfordrede til en omfattende miljøanalyse af samtlige eksisterende anlægs virkning forud for udvidelsen af lossepladsen og opførelsen af et forgasnings-/forbrændingsanlæg til produktion af elektricitet på basis af affaldsbaseret brændsel fra to nærliggende affaldsbehandlingsanlæg (et allerede i drift og et i drift til sommer).
The Rome city authorities called for a comprehensive environmental analysis of the impact caused by all the existing plants, in anticipation of the enlargement of the rubbish dump and the construction of a gassifier/incinerator designed to generate electricity from waste-derived fuel (WDF) produced by the two adjacent waste-processing plants (one already in operation and the other due to come into operation by the summer).
Forgasningsanlægget er allerede ved at blive testet og forventes at blive taget i brug i oktober 2008.
The gassifier is already undergoing trials and it is due to come into operation by October 2008.
Det er imidlertid placeret for tæt på gas- og brændstofdepoterne og på Midtitaliens største raffinaderi, som officielt er klassificeret som et anlæg, der indebærer en risiko for større uheld, i henhold til Seveso II-direktivet.
It is, however, too close to the gas and fuel storage depots and to central Italy's largest refinery — a site officially classed as being at risk of a significant accident, pursuant to the Seveso II Directive.
Det er uforståeligt, at regionalregeringen i Lazio ikke har gennemført den integrerede risikoanalyse, der gentagne gange er blevet anmodet om, når den — på baggrund af miljøkonsekvensanalysen — har nægtet at give tilladelse til at placere et nyt forgasningsanlæg drevet af AMA-ACEA i Albano.
It is incomprehensible that, although the Lazio regional government has — on the basis of the environmental-impact assessment — withheld authorisation for a new gassifier run by AMA-ACEA to be sited at Albano, it has not carried out the integrated risk study which has been called for repeatedly.
I sit tidligere svar af 7. september 2007 på skriftlig forespørgsel P-3941/07 sagde Kommissionen, at den ikke mente, at direktiv 2001/42/EF om strategisk miljøvurdering finder anvendelse, fordi en indledende undersøgelse havde vist, at opførelsen af et sådant anlæg snarere skulle betragtes som et individuelt projekt end en integreret plan.
In its earlier reply of 7 September 2007 to Written Question P‑3941/07 the Commission said that it did not consider Directive 2001/42/EC on strategic environmental assessment to be applicable; initial examination indicated that the development of such a plant was to be regarded as an individual project rather than an integrated plan.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at sagen bør undersøges igen?
Does the Commission not consider that the matter should be re-examined?
Bør regionalregeringen i Lazio ikke navnlig anmodes om at foretage en strategisk miljøvurdering, der omfatter hele området, og om at undersøge, om de enkelte anlæg overholder Seveso II-direktivet?
In particular, should the Lazio regional government not be asked to carry out a strategic environmental assessment covering the entire area and to check whether the individual plants comply with the Seveso II Directive?
Er der i forbindelse med det nye forgasningsanlæg udført risikoanalyser, og er der udarbejdet en evakueringsplan i tilfælde af uheld?
As regards the new gassifier, have the risk analyses been carried out and has an evacuation plan to be implemented in the event of an accident been drawn up?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2376/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2376/08
(25. april 2008)
(25 April 2008)
Om: HIV-testning i EU
Subject: HIV testing in the European Union
Det skønnes, at 800 000 mennesker i EU lever med hiv.
An estimated 800000 citizens of the European Union are living with HIV.
Hele 30 % af de ramte mennesker i EU (og op mod 70 % i Østeuropa) ved ikke, at de er hiv-positive.
As many as 30 % of affected people in the European Union (and up to 70 % in eastern Europe) do not know they are HIV-positive.
Mennesker, der ikke kender til deres hiv-status, menes at have 3,5 gange større sandsynlighed for at overføre hiv end dem, der har fået stillet diagnosen.
People who are unaware of their status are believed to be 3.5 times more likely to transmit HIV than those who have been diagnosed.
Da hiv-testning redder liv, har Kommissionen så planer om at gennemføre foranstaltninger for at tilskynde medlemsstaterne til at forbedre testningen og adgangen til tidligere pleje for hiv-patienter?
Given that HIV testing saves lives, does the Commission plan any action to encourage Member States to improve testing and access to earlier care for HIV patients?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2377/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2377/08
Om: Hjælp til britiske biavlere
Subject: Aid to UK beekeepers
Hvilken finansiel bistand eller anden hjælp yder Kommissionen til britiske biavlere, da landet har mistet 25-30 % af sine bikolonier i det seneste år som følge af forskellige mider?
What financial and other help is the Commission providing to British beekeepers, given that the country has lost 25 to 30 % of its bee colonies in the last year as a result of various mite infestations?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2378/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2378/08
Om: Sygdom blandt bier
Subject: Disease amongst bees
Hvilke beviser for Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) blandt bier i medlemsstaterne er Kommissionen i besiddelse af, og hvilke skridt agter den at tage for at beskytte bierne?
What evidence does the Commission have of Colony Collapse Disorder amongst bees in Member States, and what action is it taking to safeguard the existing bees?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2379/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2379/08
Hvad er Kommissionens strategi med henblik på håndteringen af en potentiel fødevaremangel?
What is the Commission’s strategy for dealing with a potential shortage of food?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2380/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2380/08
af Alexander Alvaro (ALDE) , Sophia in 't Veld (ALDE) , Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE) og Karin Resetarits (ALDE)
by Alexander Alvaro (ALDE) , Sophia in 't Veld (ALDE) , Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE) and Karin Resetarits (ALDE)
Om: Posttjenester — dataoverførsel til USA
Subject: Postal services — transfer of data to the US
I forlængelse af Kommissionen svar på vores forespørgsel E-0536/08 om overførsel af postdata til USA vil vi gerne vide, hvilke skridt Kommissionen agter at tage nu, hvor den er blevet gjort bekendt med denne dataoverførsel.
Following your answer to our Question E‑0536/08 on the transfer of postal data to the US, we would like to know what steps the European Commission intends to take, having now been informed about this transfer of data.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2381/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2381/08
Ifølge artikel 4 i den irske konkurrencelov af 2002 er alle aftaler mellem virksomheder, alle vedtagelser inden for sammenslutninger af virksomheder og alle former for samordnet praksis, der kan påvirke handelen mellem medlemsstater, og som har til formål eller til følge at hindre, begrænse eller fordreje konkurrencen inden for handel med varer eller tjenesteydelser i landet eller en del af landet, forbudt og ugyldige.
Section 4 of the Competition Act 2002 in Ireland requires all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which have as their object of effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in trade in any goods or service in the State or in any part of the State to be prohibited and void.
I de seneste 35 år har Pharmacy Contractors' Committee (PCC) under Irish Pharmacy Union (IPU), der er det repræsentative organ for apotekere, forhandlet gebyrer for apotekertjenesteydelser med Department of Health and Children og senest med Health Service Executive (HSE).
However, for the past 35 years the Pharmacy Contractors' Committee (PCC) of the Irish Pharmacy Union, the representative body for community pharmacists, has negotiated fees for pharmacy services with the Department of Health and Children and more recently the Health Service Executive (HSE).
Det endelige beløb, der udbetales, fastsættes af ministeren for sundhed og børn.
The final price paid in fees is determined by the Minister for Health and Children.
Senest har HSE nu indtaget den holdning, at det af hensyn til konkurrencelovgivningen ikke længere kan forhandle med IPU med den begrundelse, at hver enkelt kontraherende apoteker er en virksomhed i sig selv, og at IPU og PCC begge er sammenslutninger af »virksomheder«, og IPU og PCC er derfor underlagt bestemmelserne i artikel 4 i konkurrenceloven af 2002.
More recently the HSE has formed the view that, on the basis of competition law concerns, it cannot negotiate any longer with the IPU because each of the individual Community Pharmacy Contractors is an undertaking in its own right, and the IPU and the PCC are both associations of ‘undertakings’, and thus the IPU and PCC are subject to the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act 2002.
Kontraherende apotekers forhandling af priser i IPU/PCC regi udgør som sådan umiddelbart en overtrædelse af artikel 4, stk. 1.
As such, the coming together of the Pharmacy Contractors, under the auspices of the IPU/PCC, to negotiate prices would prima facie constitute a breach of Section 4(1).
HSE har nu gennemført en ensidig ændring af den aktuelle Pharmacy Contract, hvorved apotekerne refunderes mindre for lægemidler end det, de rent faktisk betaler deres grossister for dem.
The HSE has now implemented a unilateral change to the current Pharmacy Contract whereby it will reimburse pharmacists less for medicines than they can actually purchase them from their wholesalers.
Dette er sket uden høring af eller forhandling med Irish Pharmacy Union.
This has all been done without consultation or negotiation with the Irish Pharmacy Union.
Den ensidige ændring af de nuværende betalingsordninger til uholdbare niveauer og den ensidige indførelse af en ny kontrakt for apotekerne vil underminere apotekernes levedygtighed i en sådan grad, at nogle apoteker vil blive tvunget til at lukke.
The unilateral changing of the current payment arrangements to untenable levels and the unilateral imposition of a new contract on pharmacies will undermine the viability of pharmacies’ businesses to the point of forcing the closure of pharmacies in some cases.
Med henvisning til sag C-35/99, Arduino, og sag C-94/04, Cipolla, mener Kommissionen så, at forhandlinger mellem repræsentative organer for erhvervsdrivende og statslige institutioner om priser og prismodeller for tjenesteydelser, hvor den endelige pris i sidste ende bestemmes af regeringen eller et regeringsorgan, er forenelige med Fællesskabets konkurrencelovgivning?
Taking account of Case C‑35/99 Arduino and Case C‑94/04 Cipolla , does the Commission consider that negotiations between representative bodies for professionals and State institutions on prices and pricing models for services, where the final price is ultimately determined by the government or a government agency, is compatible with Community competition law?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2382/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2382/08
Om: Revision af direktiv 93/119/EF om beskyttelse af dyr på slagte- eller aflivningstidspunktet
Subject: Revision of Directive 93/119/EC on the protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing
Praktiske erfaringer og ny videnskabelig viden har vist, at direktiv 93/119/EF EFT L 340 af 31.12.1993, s. 21 . om beskyttelse af dyr på slagte- eller aflivningstidspunktet bør revideres.
Practical experience and new scientific knowledge have shown that Directive 93/119/EC on the protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing should be revised.
Et første møde i arbejdsgruppen under Den Rådgivende Gruppe for Fødevarekæden, Dyresundhed og Plantesundhed fandt sted den 19. december 2007.
A first meeting of the Working Group of the Advisory Group on the Food Chain and Animal and Plant Health was held on 19 December 2007.
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at den vil fremsætte et forslag om en revidering af direktiv 93/119/EF for Rådet og Europa-Parlamentet senest i 2009?
Can the Commission confirm that it will propose a revision of Directive 93/119/EC to the Council and the Parliament in 2009 at the latest?
Kan den bekræfte, at den nye lovgivning vil være en forordning og ikke et direktiv?
Could it confirm that the new piece of legislation will be a regulation, and not a directive?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2383/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2383/08
Om: Indførelse i EU af fælles studiegebyrer i forbindelse med uddannelse
Subject: EU imposition of joint tuition fees in education
Kommissionen forsøger at indføre et fælles studiegebyr for alle studerende, der deltager i Erasmus Mundus-programmerne.
The Commission is attempting to impose a joint tuition fee for all students participating in the Erasmus Mundus Programmes.
Den nøjagtige ordlyd er som følger: j)
The exact wording goes: j)
fastlægger et fælles studiegebyr uanset det faktiske studiested for studerende inden for masters-programmet (bilag Del A vedrørende Erasmus Mundus-programmerne).
shall establish a joint tuition fee regardless of the actual place of study of the students within the masters programme (Annex Part A for the purpose of the Erasmus Mundus Programmes).
I betragtning af at uddannelse og især fiansieringsmetoderne inden for uddannelse henhører under medlemsstaternes kompetence, er jeg temmelig foruroliget over at høre om Kommissionens forslag.
Considering that education — and in particular the model of financing in education — is a Member State competence, I was quite disturbed to find out about the Commissions proposal.
For det første er det ikke EU's anliggende, om medlemsstaterne privatiserer studiegebyrerne i masters-programmerne eller ej.
Firstly, whether or not member states privatise the tuition fees for master's programmes is not a matter for the EU.
Sverige har demokratisk besluttet at finansiere masters-programmerne med offentlige midler, og vi har ikke til hensigt at ændre noget på det.
Sweden has democratically decided to publicly fund master's programmes, and we have no intention of changing that.
For det andet finder jeg det besynderligt at indsætte et vigtigt forslag i et bilag.
Secondly, I find it rather awkward to put such an essential aspect of a proposal in an annex.
Det er helt klart ikke et godt eksempel på gennemskuelighed at gøre dette.
It is clearly not a good example of transparency to proceed in such a way.
Jeg anmoder om at få en redegørelse for Kommissionens privatiseringskampagne inden for højere uddannelse.
I request an explanation of the Commission's privatisation drive in higher education.
På hvilket retsgrundlag eller noget andet grundlag kan Kommissionen basere sit forslag?
On what legal basis or on what basis at all can the Commission justify its proposal?
Kommissionen har det fulde ansvar for sine forslag, herunder det, som det ærede parlamentsmedlem henviser til (KOM(2007)0395 endelig).
Responsibility for the Commission's proposals, including the one referred to by the Honourable Member (COM(2007)395 final), rests entirely with that institution.
Da det pågældende forslag stadig behandles i Rådet, er det endnu ikke i stand til formelt at tage stilling til det spørgsmål, der rejses.
Given that work in the Council on this proposal is still under way, the Council is not yet in a position to adopt a formal view on the issue raised.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2384/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2384/08
Om: Domfældelse af det tidligere kurdiske parlamentsmedlem Leyla Zana
Subject: Conviction of former Kurdish MP Leyla Zana
I sidste uge idømte en domstol i Diyarbakir i det østlige Tyrkiet den tyrkiske statsborger af kurdisk afstamning og tidligere parlamentsmedlem Leyla Zana to års fængsel for »en forsvarstale for den fængslede kurdiske leder Abdullah Öcalan«.
Last week, a court in Diyarbakir, Eastern Turkey, sentenced the Turkish Kurd and former Member of Parliament Leyla Zana to two years' imprisonment for ‘an apologia on behalf of the imprisoned Kurdish leader Abdullah Öcalan’.
I 1995 modtog Leyla Zana Europa-Parlamentets Sakharovpris.
In 1995, Leyla Zana was awarded the European Parliament's Sakharov Prize.
Det er helt tydeligt, at Leyla Zana blev dømt udelukkende på baggrund af sine meninger.
It is quite clear that Leyla Zana was convicted purely on account of her opinions.
I sidste uge var kommissionsformand Barroso sammen med kommissæren for udvidelse, Olli Rehn, i Ankara til drøftelser med de tyrkiske myndigheder.
Last week, Commission President Barroso, together with the Commissioner for Enlargement, Olli Rehn, was in Ankara for talks with the Turkish authorities.
Barroso mødtes bl.a. med Tyrkiets præsident, Abdullah Güll.
Among those with whom Mr Barroso had talks was the President of Turkey, Abdullah Güll.
Hvordan gjorde kommissionsformanden og Rehn indsigelser mod domfældelsen af Leyla Zana? —
How did the Commission President and Mr Rehn protest about the conviction of Leyla Zana? —
Er respekt for fuld ytringsfrihed ikke en absolut forudsætning, som skal opfyldes af et kandidatland? —
Is not respect for complete freedom of expression an absolute precondition which must be met by a candidate Member State? —
Er domfældelsen af Leyla Zana ikke i modstrid med dette princip?
Does not the conviction of Leyla Zana violate this principle?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2385/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2385/08
Om: Barrosos besøg i Kina og tortur i kinesiske fængsler
Subject: Visit to China by Mr Barroso and torture in Chinese prisons
Fra den 23. til 25. april aflægger kommissionsformand Barroso sammen med andre kommissærer et officielt besøg i Kina.
From 23 to 25 April, Commission President Barroso, together with other Commissioners, will be paying an official visit to China.
Barroso har udtalt, at han har til hensigt at drøfte udviklingen i Tibet: »Jeg ønsker at vise dem, at der er uoverensstemmelse mellem det at arrangere et så stort stævne som De Olympiske Lege og tilstanden af underkuelse og anspændthed«, sagde han (Skynet News, onsdag den 9. april).
Mr Barroso has stated that he intends to raise the subject of developments in Tibet: ‘I wish to show them that there is a contradiction between organising a major festival such as the Olympic Games and the situation of repression and tension’, he said (Skynet News, Wednesday, 9 April).
I 2004 mødte fotografen Joakim Eneroth fra bureauet VU den undvegne tibetanske munk Palden Gyatso i hans eksil, Dharamsala.
In 2004, the photographer Joakim Eneroth, of the agency VU, met the escaped Tibetan monk Palden Gyatso in his place of exile, Dharamsala.
Gyatso tilbragte 33 år i fængsel, hvor han blev tortureret meget regelmæssigt.
Gyatso spent 33 years in prison and was tortured very regularly.
Torturmetoderne, såsom elektriske chok i munden, anvendes fortsat i dag.
The torture methods, such as electric shocks to the mouth, continue to be used to this day.
(Libération, fredag den 11. april 2008).
( Libération , Friday, 11 April 2008).
Vil Barroso bede de kinesiske myndigheder om straks at sætte en stopper for al tortur i kinesiske fængsler under sit officielle besøg i Kina?
During his official visit to China, will Mr Barroso ask the Chinese authorities immediately to halt all torture in Chinese prisons?
Vil Barroso anmode om, at uafhængige observatører får adgang til kinesiske fængsler?
Will Mr Barroso ask for independent observers to be admitted to Chinese prisons?
Mener Barroso ikke, at det vil give grundlag for en boykot i det mindste af Legenes åbningsceremoni, såfremt de kinesiske myndigheder afviser dette?
Does not Mr Barroso consider that a refusal by the Chinese authorities would warrant organising a boycott at least of the opening ceremony of the Games?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2386/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2386/08