natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vil Kommissionen give oplysninger om den støtte, den har ydet til hvert projekt, idet det i hvert tilfælde oplyses, hvorvidt støtten blev ydet efter udbud?
Will the Commission provide details of the support funds it has provided to each project, listing in each case whether the funding was provided after competitive tender?
Hvilke undersøgelser understøtter påstanden om, at EU's befolkning allerede er blevet eksponeret for over 80 % af den samlede kollektive strålingsdosis fra Chernobyl-ulykken?
What studies underpin the assertion that ‘more than 80 % of the total collective dose to the EU population from Chernobyl has already been delivered’?
Vil Kommissionen kvantificere ordet »væsentligt« som anvendt i den del af svaret, hvori det fastlås, at frigørelse af radioaktivt materiale i forbindelse med skovbrande ikke bidrager væsentligt til tidligere eller kommende eksponering af befolkningen i EU?
Will the Commission quantify the word ‘significantly’ as used in the part of the answer that states ‘resuspension of radioactive material from forest fires does not contribute significantly to the past or future exposure of the EU population’?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3998/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3998/06
Om: Træfældning i habitatområde — kompensationsforanstaltninger
Subject: Grubbing-up of trees in Habitat area — Compensatory measures
I sommeren 2006 (fra den 11. august) blev der fældet træer i det habitatområde, der er nævnt i forespørgsel P-­1129/­05.
In the summer of 2006 (starting on 11 August), trees were grubbed up in the Habitat area referred to in Question P‑1129/05.
Tilladelsen hertil blev givet af regionalrådet i provinsen Antwerpen.
The permit for this was issued by the Permanent Committee of the Province of Antwerp.
Disse træer er et naturligt element i dette område.
These trees were a natural feature of the area.
Fældningen af træerne ødelægger områdets særpræg.
Removing them has seriously impaired the character of the area.
Modargumenterne er ikke videnskabeligt underbyggede, og kompensationsforanstaltningerne er i høj grad utilstrækkelige.
No scientific arguments have been adduced to prove otherwise, and the compensatory measures are extremely inadequate.
Den fuldstændige rydning af disse træer (og den deraf følgende ødelæggelse af dette habitatområde) kunne have været undgået ved f.eks. at forlænge den lokale lufthavns landingsbane eller ved en »steep approach«.
The complete removal of these trees (and the associated destruction of this Habitat area) could have been avoided, for example by raising the runway of the local airport or by means of a steep approach.
Hvis man alvorligt havde overvejet dette alternativ, kunne det desuden have bidraget til, at det ikke havde været nødvendigt at henvise til »bydende nødvendige hensyn til væsentlige samfundsinteresser«.
Moreover, if serious consideration had been given to these alternatives, it would have helped to obviate the need to invoke ‘imperative reasons of overriding public interest’.
Anser Kommissionen kompensationsplanerne for tilstrækkelig overbevisende, og kan den tilslutte sig denne argumentation og dermed rydningen af træerne?
Does the Commission consider the compensation plans convincing enough, and does it agree with the authorities' arguments and hence with the grubbing-up of the trees?
I bekræftende fald: kan den tydeliggøre dette?
If so, can the Commission explain its position on this?
I benægtende fald: kan den angive, hvilke problemer der efter dens opfattelse gør sig gældende?
If not, can it explain what problems exist in its opinion?
Modtog Kommissionen oplysningerne fra Belgien, inden rydningen af træerne påbegyndtes?
Did the Commission receive the information from Belgium before the removal of the trees began?
Afventede den pågældende medlemsstat Kommissionens afgørelse, inden fældningen påbegyndtes?
Did the Member State await the Commission's assessment before starting to remove the trees?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3999/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3999/06
Om: Behovet for yderligere beskyttelsesforanstaltninger for at hindre ukorrekt implementering af EU's eksterne aftaler
Subject: Need for additional protective measures to prevent irregular implementation of EU external agreements
Det Europæiske Fællesskab skal overholde international ret, når det handler.
The European Community must respect international law in the exercise of its power.
I de aftalemæssige relationer til tredjelande bærer Fællesskabet ansvaret for de praktiske konsekvenser af afgørelser om, hvad man vil opnå, og hvilken standarder der kan accepteres, for så vidt angår de statslige og ikke-statslige aktører, Fællesskabet indgår aftale med.
In its contractual relations with third States, the Community bears responsibility for the practical consequences of its decisions in terms of what it is trying to achieve and the standards which are acceptable in terms of the conduct of the State and non-State actors with which the Community enters into agreement.
Fællesskabet kan ikke acceptere, at nogen aktør begår alvorlige overtrædelser af international ret.
The Community cannot accept serious violations of international law by any actor.
Det kan ikke bevidst acceptere, at privilegerede aftaler, ressourcer og muligheder, der via disse aftaler er gjort tilgængelige for tredjepart, anvendes til at begå sådanne overtrædelser, og det må træffe passende foranstaltninger til at hindre et sådant misbrug.
It cannot knowingly allow its preferential agreements, or resources and facilities made available to third parties under those agreements, to be used to commit such violations and it must take appropriate measures to preclude such abuse.
For nylig har Parlamentet beskæftiget sig med to sager, der rejser vigtige spørgsmål i denne forbindelse.
Two cases, which both raise important questions in this respect, have recently been put before Parliament.
Israel anvender i strid med international ret sine forskellige aftaler med EU også i de besatte områder, og ofte overtrædes endog aftalens ordlyd.
Israel applies its various agreements with the EU even on occupied territory, contrary to international law and, frequently, in violation of the very wording of the agreements.
Mangler i Fællesskabets budgetkontrol og EU's toldadministration har medført overtrædelser af fællesskabsretten.
Failings in the Community's budgetary control and the EU's customs administration have resulted in breaches of Community law.
I februar 2005 begyndte EU og Israel at gennemføre de tekniske ordninger, der skal rette op på disse mangler, men Israel gennemfører fortsat sine aftaler med EU på en måde, der strider mod international ret.
In February 2005, the EU and Israel began to implement technical arrangements designed to put an end to those failings but Israel continues to implement its agreements with the EU in a way which contravenes international law.
Desuden anvender Marokko i øjeblikket i strid med international ret sine aftaler om fiskerisamarbejde også på Vestsahara og dettes territorialfarvand og eksklusive zone.
Furthermore, at the present time, Morocco is also applying its fisheries partnership agreement to Western Sahara, its coastal waters and its exclusive economic zone, contrary to international law.
Hvis det påvises, at fiskerifartøjer fra EU-­stater lander fangster fra Vestsaharas territorialfarvand mod afgifter til Marokko, vil Kommissionen da mene, at der er tale om uretmæssige handlinger eller fejl, der må tages op i lyset af fællesskabsretten?
If facts are presented which clearly show that Member States' fishing vessels are landing fish caught in Western Saharan waters against payment to Morocco, will the Commission consider that there is an irregularity or failing which must be dealt with in the light of Community law?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4001/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4001/06
Om: Følgerne af sammenbruddet i Doha-forhandlingerne
Subject: Consequences of the suspension of the Doha talks
Efter sammenbruddet i forhandlingerne under Doha-Udviklingsrunden i juli 2006 vil det være relevant at gøre sig overvejelser om konsekvenserne heraf på kort og lang sigt.
Following the suspension in July 2006 of the Doha Development Round negotiations, it would be useful to think about the short- and long-term consequences of that suspension.
Følgende spørgsmål bedes besvaret: 1.
In view of this: 1.
Hvilke følger vil dette efter Kommissionens opfattelse få for de internationale handelsforbindelser og for Verdenshandelsorganisationens fremtid?
How does the Commission think it will affect international trade relations and the future of the World Trade Organisation?
Mener den, at dette sammenbrud kan betragtes som begyndelsen til en lang periode med bilaterale forhandlinger og aftaler? 2.
Does the Commission believe that the suspension can be seen as the start of a long series of bilateral negotiations and agreements? 2.
Hvilke strategier og andre tiltag planlægger Kommissionen at sætte i værk i de kommende måneder for at forsøge at relancere Doha-Runden? 3.
What are the Commission’s intended strategies and actions over the next few months with a view to attempting to kick-start the Doha Round? 3.
Vil sammenbruddet på nogen måde berøre den af Kommissionen planlagte handelspolitik for de kommende år for så vidt angår udviklingslandene? 4.
Will the suspension have any impact on the Commission’s intended trade policy as regards the least developed countries over the next few years? 4.
Hvordan vil det berøre Kommissionens bilaterale forhandlinger med andre handelsblokke? 5.
How will it affect the Commission’s bilateral negotiations with other trade blocs? 5.
Vil det give nye impulser til indgåelsen af aftaler som f.eks. EU-­Mercosur-aftalen?
Will it help boost the process of concluding agreements such as that between the EU and Mercosur?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4002/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4002/06
Om: EUGFL — de udbetalende instansers omkostninger
Subject: European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) — costs of paying agencies
Medlemsstaterne udpeger de tjenestesteder og instanser, der udbetaler midler fra EUGFL.
The Member States designate the authorities and bodies empowered to incur expenditure from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF).
Der er her tale om autoriserede tjenestesteder og instanser i medlemsstaterne.
Paying agencies are approved authorities and bodies of the Member States.
Findes der en liste over præstationsrelevante nøgletal (forholdet mellem antallet af bearbejdede sager og antallet af ansatte og de samlede omkostninger)?
Is there a list of key performance figures (number of cases processed in relation to the number of posts and overall costs)?
Hvorledes fordeles de udbetalende instansers omkostninger?
How are the costs of the paying agencies allocated?
Navnlig: Betales de af nationale midler?
In particular, are they borne by national resources?
Findes der en liste over præstationsrelevante nøgletal for kontrolinstanserne (forholdet mellem antallet af bearbejdede sager og antallet af ansatte og de samlede omkostninger)?
Is there a list of key performance figures for the certifying bodies (number of cases processed in relation to the number of posts and overall costs)?
Hvorledes fordeles kontrolinstansernes omkostninger?
How are the costs of the certifying bodies allocated?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4003/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4003/06
Om: Mangfoldige negative virkninger af kæderygning
Subject: Wide-ranging detrimental effects of passive smoking
Af de undersøgelsesresultater, der for nylig er blevet forelagt på den 16. internationale konference om lungesygdomme, fremgår det, at også »passiv« rygning er overordentlig farlig.
The findings of research presented recently to the 16th International Congress on Pulmonary Disease show that passive smoking is particularly dangerous.
Det har faktisk vist sig, at de passive rygere løber en 80 % højere risiko for lungekræft og hjertelidelser (relevante undersøgelser har ligeledes vist, at de har en 30 % højere dødelighed).
They show, in fact, that passive smokers have an approximately 80 % greater risk of lung cancer and heart disease (related studies have also shown that their mortality rate is 30 % higher).
Over 79000 personer dør hvert år i EU som følge af at have været udsat for passiv rygning; 19242 af dem er ikke-rygere (hvoraf ca. 3000 udsættes for passiv rygning på deres arbejdsplads).
More than 79000 people in the EU die every year through exposure to passive smoking, 19242 of whom are non-smokers (some 3000 of whom are exposed to passive smoking at their place of work).
I alt 7,5 millioner mennesker er passive rygere på deres arbejdsplads i de 14 EU-­lande, hvor undersøgelserne blev foretaget.
In total, 7.5 million people are passive smokers at their place of work in the 14 Member States of the EU in which the research was carried out.
Ifølge den samme undersøgelse ville forbud mod rygning på arbejdspladsen kunne mindske forekomsten af lungekræft med 8 % og astma og kronisk bronkitis med op til 30 %.
According to the same study, banning smoking at the workplace could reduce the incidence of lung cancer by 8 % and asthma and chronic bronchitis by up to 30 %.
Råder Kommissionen over detaljerede oplysninger om sundhedsrisici forbundet med passiv rygning samt de økonomiske omkostninger, som dette medfører for det offentlige sundhedsvæsen i de enkelte medlemsstater?
Does the Commission have details about the health risks posed by passive smoking and the financial cost entailed in terms of public health in each Member State?
Hvordan beskrives situationen i Grækenland, som er »rygernes paradis«, hvor rygeforbuddene overtrædes hæmningsløst samtidig med, at ca. 45 % af landets befolkning ryger?
What is the situation in Greece, the smoker's ‘paradise’, where bans on smoking are flagrantly flouted while, at the same time, some 45 % of its population smoke?
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe for at presse medlemsstaternes regeringer til at indføre et generelt forbud mod rygning på offentlige steder, især på arbejdspladserne, hvor borgernes sundhed er udsat for de største risici?
What steps will the Commission take to exert pressure on Member States' governments to introduce a general ban on smoking in public places and, in particular, places of work where there is an even greater threat to citizens' health?
Hvordan agter Kommissionen at kontrollere, at de bestående foranstaltninger gennemføres effektivt?
How does it propose to monitor the effective enforcement of existing measures?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4004/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4004/06
En af vælgerne i min valgkreds blev for nylig frataget begge dele af sit kørekort (EU-­plastikkort og UK-­papirdel), indtil UK-­myndighederne havde påført en anmærkning om overskridelse af hastighedsgrænserne.
One of my constituents recently had both parts of his driving licence removed from him (EU plastic card and UK paper section) pending the entry of a speeding endorsement by the UK authorities.
Han fik en »kvittering«, der gav ham tilladelse til at køre i ventetiden, men opdagede, at denne kvittering ikke blev anerkendt som juridisk gyldig erstatning for et EU-­kørekort i Spanien.
He was given a ‘receipt’ which allowed him to drive in the interim but found that the receipt was not recognised as a legal substitute for an EU driving licence in Spain.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om noget politi overhovedet har bemyndigelse til at fratage føreren af en bil et EU-­kørekort uden nogen retssag og dermed forhindre vedkommende i at køre lovligt i EU?
Can the Commission inform me what right, if any, any police has force to remove from a driver, in the absence of any Court proceedings, an EU driving licence, thereby preventing the driver from driving legally throughout the EU?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4005/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4005/06
Om: Supplerende forespørgsel om utilfredsstillende politioptræden i Kroatien
Subject: Follow-up question on the unacceptable conduct of police in Croatia
I svaret på forespørgsel (P-­3155/­06) i anledning af mishandlingen af en nederlandsk journalist i Kroatien oplyser Kommissionen, at den ikke har grund til at antage, at der er tale om et strukturelt problem i det kroatiske politiapparat.
In answer to my Question P‑3155/06 concerning the attack on a Dutch journalist in Croatia, the Commission says that it is not aware of this being representative of a structural problem in Croatia.
I mellemtiden har jeg imidlertid fået en ny klage fra to nederlandske familier, der var på ferie i Valbandon i Kroatien.
In the meantime, however, I have received a further complaint from two Dutch families who were on holiday in Valbandon in Croatia.
Søndag den 23. juli 2006 blev familiernes tre sønner helt umotiveret overfaldet med knojern af otte unge kroater i et ferielands svømmebassin.
On Sunday, 23 July 2006 the families’ three sons were the victims of an unprovoked attack by eight Croatian youths who beat them up with knuckledusters in a swimming pool in holiday park.
Heller ikke disse ofre var tilfredse med politiets efterfølgende optræden.
The victims were extremely dissatisfied with the subsequent behaviour of the police.
De blev behandlet som gerningsmænd, skulle aflevere deres pas og blev endda beordret til som mistænkte at stille sig bag en skillevæg.
They were treated as the perpetrators, required to hand over their passports and even asked to line up behind a screen as suspects, which they naturally refused to do.
De er nu i færd med at bringe papirarbejdet i orden med hjælp fra den nederlandske ambassade i Zagreb.
They are now getting the paperwork in order with the assistance of the Dutch embassy in Zagreb.
De fik at vide af den nederlandske ambassade, at der ofte er problemer med mishandling og efterfølgende utilfredsstillende optræden fra politiets side.
They understand from the Dutch embassy that problems of assault and unsatisfactory intervention by the police are common problems.
Er Kommissionen enig i, at det er et spørgsmål, om man her stadig kan tale om episoder?
Does the Commission not agree that it is doubtful whether these are merely isolated incidents?
Kommissionen opfordres endnu engang til at pålægge sit forhandlingsteam at kontakte de kroatiske myndigheder om dette spørgsmål og undersøge, i hvilket omfang denne optræden fra politiets side er strukturelt betinget.
May I once again urge the Commission to ask its negotiating team to take these issues up with the Croatian authorities and to investigate to what extent behaviour of this kind by the police is a structural problem?
Er Kommissionen rede hertil?
Is the Commission prepared to do so?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4006/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4006/06
Om: Udviklingen i bilindustrien efter forordning 1400/­2002
Subject: Developments in the car retailing and after-sales markets after Regulation (EEC) No 1400/2002
Disse konklusioner bekræfter klagerne fra en række især mindre, autoriserede forhandlere.
These conclusions confirm the complaints made by a number of mainly small dealers.
De store investeringer, der kræves af dem, er uholdbare på lang sigt og bidrager ikke altid til kvaliteten af servicen og bedre garantier for forbrugerne.
The major investments that they are required to make are unsustainable in the longer term and do not always bring benefits in terms of quality of service and better conditions for the consumer.
Finder Kommissionen det acceptabelt, at bestemte investeringer, der kun må foretages via bilproducenterne (f.eks. uddannelse, arbejdsredskaber, internetopkoblinger osv.) er meget dyrere, end hvis de kunne købes hos en uafhængig tjenesteyder?
Does the Commission regard it as acceptable that certain investments in services which have to be supplied by the manufacturer, such as training, equipment, Internet connections and so on, are much more expensive than if they could be purchased from an independent provider?
Hvilke konklusioner drager Kommissionen på grundlag af de modtagne og behandlede klager og den undersøgelse, der blev offentliggjort i juli?
What conclusion does the Commission draw from the complaints it has received and investigated and the study published in July?
Mener den, at forordningen har opfyldt sit mål?
Does it consider that Regulation (EEC) No 1400/2002 has achieved its objective?
Vil Kommissionen vente med at træffe de nødvendige initiativer til at tilpasse forordningen til efter evalueringen i 2008?
Will the Commission wait until after the 2008 evaluation to take the necessary steps to amend the regulation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4007/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4007/06
Om: Eksport af affald til tredjelande
Subject: Export of waste to third countries
Den 19. august tilbød skibet Probo Koala affald til forarbejdning i Abidjan i Côte d'Ivoire.
On 19 August the tanker Probo Koala unloaded waste for processing in Abidjan in Côte d'Ivoire.
Affaldet blev siden placeret i nærheden af et boligkvarter.
The waste subsequently ended up in a residential neighbourhood.
Ifølge Baselkonventionen må affald ikke eksporteres, men det må godt tilbydes til forarbejdning i tredjelande.
Under the Basel Convention, waste may not be exported but may be sent to third countries for processing.
Forarbejdningen skal foretages af virksomheder, der er godkendt af myndighederne.
Processing then has to be carried out by government accredited companies.
Modsat kødsektoren har EU-­kontrollører ikke mandat til at godkende sådanne tilladelser.
European officials do not have any authority to approve accreditation, except in the meat sector.
Udviklingslandene får på mange måder affald til forarbejdning fra Europa.
Developing countries are involved with waste from Europe in a number of ways.
Affald til forarbejdning, skrotbiler, skibe til ophugning, udtjente hårde hvidevarer.
Waste for processing, scrapped vehicles, ships and white goods.
Det er ikke første gang, affald forarbejdes eller dumpes på usikker måde i udviklingslandene.
This is not the first time that waste has been processed or dumped in an unsafe way in developing countries.
Det er i strid med ånden i Baselkonventionen.
This goes against the spirit of the Basel Convention.
Ud over affald udskibes mange produkter til udviklingslandene til brug for brugtmarkedet.
In addition to waste, many products are shipped to developing countries for the second-hand market.
Er Kommissionen rede til at undersøge muligheden for at tilpasse den nuværende lovgivning, således at forarbejdningsvirksomheder i tredjelande også skal godkendes af EU?
Is the Commission prepared to examine the possibility of revising current legislation so as to require processing companies in third countries to be accredited by the EU as well?
Er Kommissionen rede til at træffe foranstaltninger for at sikre, at betalte bortskaffelsesbeløb følger de udrangerede produkter eller brugte artikler til udviklingslandene?
Will it take steps to ensure that amounts paid for the disposal of scrapped goods or second-hand articles go to third countries along with the goods?
Er Kommissionen rede til i EU/­AVS-sammenhæng at formidle viden til AVS-­landene og hjælpe dem med en strengere håndhævelse af international lovgivning på dette område?
Will the Commission transfer knowledge the ACP countries within the EU‑ACP framework to help them ensure that international legislation in this area is more strictly enforced?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4010/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4010/06
Om: Bekæmpelse af svinepest i Nordrhein-Westfalen
Subject: Control of swine fever in North Rhine-Westphalia
Bekæmpelsen af svinepestepidemien i Nordrhein-Westfalen (marts til juni 2006) blev præget af flere kommissionsafgørelser, der delvis gik betragteligt ud over EU-­rettens bestemmelser om bekæmpelsesforanstaltninger og økonomiske begrænsninger.
The control of the swine fever epidemic in North Rhine-Westphalia (March-June 2006) was heavily influenced by several Commission decisions providing a basis for control measures and economic restrictions that at times went far beyond the relevant EU legislation.
Hvorfor var restriktionerne ikke regionalt begrænsede, men baseret på en delstatsgrænse, der var irrelevant i denne forbindelse?
Why were zone restrictions not imposed regionally but within the borders of a federal state, an irrelevant area in this case?