natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der har i Schweiz siden 2006 været trådt skærpede supplerende tiltag til denne aftale i kraft, som vedrører udstationeringen af arbejdstagere i Schweiz, og som også indeholder sanktioner, hvis arbejdsgiverne overtræder disse bestemmelser.
Since 2006 more stringent ‘flanking measures’ to this agreement have been in force in Switzerland concerning the secondment of workers to Switzerland, which lay down sanctions where employers fail to comply with these provisions.
Repræsentanter for EU-grænseregionerne har nu klaget over, at anvendelsen af disse supplerende tiltag i praksis medfører hindringer af relevant økonomisk betydning for EU-virksomheder i Schweiz.
Representatives of EU regions near the Swiss border have complained that the practical application of these flanking measures is creating barriers for EU firms in Switzerland that are having a significant economic impact.
Hvordan kan det sikres, at den praktiske anvendelse af de supplerende tiltag i Schweiz ikke går ud over den aftalemæssigt tilsikrede gensidige åbning af markederne?
What can be done to ensure that the practical application of the flanking measures in Switzerland does not hinder the reciprocal opening of markets enshrined in the agreements?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5672/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5672/08
Om: Fremtidig projektstøtte i Afrika — projekter med kinesisk deltagelse
Subject: Future support for projects in Africa — projects with Chinese involvement
Kommissionen har gennemført en offentlig høring vedrørende trilateral dialog og samarbejde mellem EU, Afrika og Kina, hvor resultaterne nu er blevet offentliggjort.
The Commission has held a public consultation on the topic ‘EU, Africa and China — trilateral dialogue and cooperation’, the results of which have now been published.
I spørgsmål 3.5 blev der spurgt, inden for hvilke sektorer Kina har en konkurrencefordel.
Question 3.5 asked in which sectors China has a competitive advantage.
De fleste af svarene indikerede, at kinesiske virksomheder særligt har en konkurrencefordel på infrastrukturområdet.
Most replies indicated that Chinese firms were mainly considered to have a competitive advantage in the area of infrastructure.
I den tilhørende kommentar bekræfter Kommissionen denne vurdering.
The Commission confirms this assessment in the corresponding comment.
I sin kommentar til spørgsmål 3.7 anfører Kommissionen, at der på grund af Kinas konkurrencefordele i infrastruktursektoren synes at foreligge et klart potentiale for et trilateralt samarbejde i denne sektor.
In its comment on question 3.7, the Commission states that, given China's competitive advantage in the infrastructure sector, there seems to be a clear potential for trilateral cooperation in this sector.
Hvad er baggrunden for Kommissionens udtalelse om konkurrencefordelene for Kina i infrastruktursektoren?
What leads the Commission to make this statement on China's competitive advantages in the infrastructure sector?
Foreligger der her et konkret datamateriale?
Are there any specific data on this subject?
Hvordan agter Kommissionen især at håndtere resultaterne vedrørende den ovenstående problematik ved udbydelsen af og udvælgelsen af støtte til infrastrukturprojekter i Afrika?
How does the Commission intend to deal with the results of the above question, in particular when inviting proposals and selecting infrastructure projects to be supported in Africa?
Hvordan vurderer Kommissionen de europæiske virksomheders muligheder for også i fremtiden at deltage i infrastrukturprojekter i Afrika?
How does the Commission assess the possibilities for European firms to continue to take part in infrastructure projects in Africa in the future?
Hvad forstås der præcist ved trilateralt samarbejde?
What exactly is to be understood by trilateral cooperation?
Mener Kommissionen, at der er behov for handling for at forbedre den mulige konkurrencemæssige ulempe for europæiske virksomheder på infrastrukturområdet?
Does the Commission consider action necessary to improve the possible competitive disadvantage suffered by European firms in the infrastructure sector?
Giver resultaterne af høringen også anledning til konsekvenser for sektorerne sundhed og uddannelse?
Do the results of the consultation also have consequences for the health and education sectors?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5673/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5673/08
Om: Balance mellem nationale flåder og fiskerimuligheder
Subject: Balance between national fleets and fishing opportunities
I dens svar på mit skriftlige spørgsmål E-4704/08 anførte Kommissionen, at de fleste af medlemsstaternes rapporter ikke gav en klar vurdering af, om den nationale flådekapacitet stod i forhold til de disponible fiskerimuligheder.
In its reply to my Written Question E‑4704/08 the Commission stated that ‘the majority of the Member States' reports did not provide a clear assessment of whether the national fleet capacity was in balance with the fishing opportunities made available to it’.
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, hvilke af medlemsstaternes rapporter, der ikke gav en klar vurdering af, om den nationale flådekapacitet stod i forhold til de disponible fiskerimuligheder, og hvilke rapporter der gav mulighed for en sådan vurdering.
Could the Commission clarify which Member States’ reports did not provide a clear assessment of whether the national fleet capacity was in balance with the fishing opportunities made available to it and which Member States’ reports allowed such an assessment?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5674/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5674/08
Om: Anholdelse af høvding Ayamba Ette Otun og aktivister fra Sydcameroun i Cameroun
Subject: Arrest of Chief Ayamba Ette Otun and Southern Cameroon activists in Cameroon
Ifølge rapporter offentliggjort af UNPO blev høvding Ayamba Ette Otun, som er 84 år gammel og leder af Southern Cameroons National Council (SCNC) arresteret af myndighederne i Cameroun den 6. oktober 2008 i Mutengene sammen med 24 andre medlemmer af SCNC.
Reports published by the UNPO inform that Chief Ayamba Ette Otun (84 years old), Chairman of the Southern Cameroons National Council (SCNC), was arrested by Cameroon's authorities on 6 October 2008 in Mutengene, along with 24 other members of the SCNC.
Blandt de anholdte aktivister var en blind mand og fire personer, som havde brug for omgående lægebehandling.
Arrested activists include a blind man and 4 people in need of urgent medical attention.
Indtil videre (den 9. oktober 2008) har de offentlige anklagere ikke indgivet en formel anklage mod de anholdte aktivister.
Until now (9 October 2008) no formal charge has been filed by prosecutors against the arrested activists.
Menneskerettighedssituationen i Cameroun er stadig bekymrende, særlig med hensyn til forholdene for menneskerettighedsforkæmpere, uberettiget fængslede journalister, den måde, menneskerettighedskommissionen fungerer på, og uregelmæssigheder i forbindelse med valg.
The situation of human rights in Cameroon remains worrying, with particular regard to the condition of human rights defenders, wrongfully imprisoned journalists, the effectiveness of the Human Rights Commission and irregularities in elections.
I den forbindelse lader situationen til at være særligt alarmerende i den engelsksprogede region, Southern Cameroons.
In this respect the situation seems to be particularly alarming in the anglophone region known as Southern Cameroons.
Vil Kommissionen betragte høvding Ayamba Ette Otun og de andre anholdte aktivister som menneskerettighedsforkæmpere og overvåge deres retssager og tilbageholdelsesforhold i overensstemmelse med EU's retningslinjer for menneskerettighedsforkæmpere?
Will the Commission consider Chief Ayamba Ette Otun and the other arrested activists as human rights defenders and monitor their trials and conditions of detention, in accordance with the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders?
Agter Kommissionen at rejse spørgsmålet om menneskerettighedssituationen i den engelsksprogede region Southern Cameroons over for myndighederne i Republikken Cameroun?
Will the Commission raise the question of the situation of human rights in the anglophone region of Southern Cameroons with the authorities of the Republic of Cameroon?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5675/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5675/08
Om: Anmodning fra Den Afrikanske Union vedrørende universel jurisdiktion
Subject: Request from the AU concerning Universal Jurisdiction
På Den Afrikanske Unions 11. ordinære forsamling i Sharm El-Sheikh i Egypten den 30. juni-1. juli 2008 blev der vedtaget en beslutning om Kommissionens rapport om misbrug af princippet om universel jurisdiktion (dok.
In the Eleventh Ordinary Session of the Assembly of the African Union, (in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 30 June to 1 July 2008), a decision was adopted on the report of the Commission on the Abuse of the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction (Doc.
Endvidere anmodede Den Afrikanske Union om, at der snarest muligt blev afholdt et møde mellem Den Afrikanske Union og EU for at drøfte sagen med henblik på at finde en varig løsning på dette problem og særlig at sikre, at kendelserne trækkes tilbage og ikke kan eksekveres i et hvilket som helst land.
Furthermore, it requested ‘to urgently cause a meeting between the AU and European Union (EU) to discuss the matter with a view to finding a lasting solution to this problem and in particular to ensure that those warrants are withdrawn and are not executable in any country’.
Endelig opfordrede den i beslutningen også alle medlemmer af FN, særlig EU-medlemsstaterne, til at indføre et moratorium for eksekveringen af kendelserne, indtil der er foregået en udtømmende drøftelse af alle juridiske og politiske spørgsmål.
Finally, it also requested ‘all UN Member States, in particular the EU States, to impose a moratorium on the execution of those warrants until all the legal and political issues have been exhaustively discussed between’.
Rådet bedes oplyse, hvilke reaktioner der har været på denne erklæring.
Could the Council explain what have been the reactions to this statement?
Er det møde, der anmodes om, allerede planlagt?
Is the requested meeting already set up?
Hvad vil Rådets holdning være, særlig i lyset af det nuværende europæiske Sirene-system?
What will be the Council's position, particularly in view of the European SIRENE system presently in force?
Rådet har endnu ikke reageret formelt på den beslutning, som Den Afrikanske Unions forsamling har truffet om misbrug af princippet om universel jurisdiktion (Egypten, den 30. juni-1. juli 2008).
The Council has not so far reacted formally to the decision of the Assembly of the African Union on the Abuse of the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction (Egypt, 30 June to 1 July 2008).
Spørgsmålet drøftes imidlertid i Rådets organer.
However, this issue is being discussed by the Council bodies.
På Den Afrikanske Unions (AU) opfordring blev universel jurisdiktion drøftet på det 10. ministertrojkamøde mellem Afrika og EU (Bruxelles, den 16. september 2008).
At the request of the African Union (AU), universal jurisdiction was discussed at the 10th Africa-EU Ministerial troika meeting (Brussels, 16 September 2008).
Ved den lejlighed noterede EU sig bekymringen fra afrikansk side over misbrug af princippet, der vil kunne bringe international ret i fare.
On that occasion, the EU took note of the African concerns at the abusive application of the principle which could endanger international law.
EU bekræftede sit engagement i bekæmpelsen af straffrihed.
The EU reiterated its attachment to the fight against impunity.
Ministrene var enige om, at der skulle afholdes yderligere drøftelser mellem AU og EU om dette spørgsmål.
Ministers agreed that further discussions between the AU and the EU should be held on the subject.
Det er derfor umuligt for de politiske myndigheder i medlemsstaterne, for ikke at tale om Rådet for Den Europæiske Union, at gribe ind i behandlingen af europæiske arrestordrer.
In general, it is therefore impossible for the political authorities in the Member States, let alone the Council of the European Union, to intervene in the operation of European arrest warrants.
Sirenekontorerne udveksler supplerende oplysninger vedrørende indberetninger i Schengeninformationssystemet.
The Sirene bureaux exchange supplementary information relating to alerts entered into the Schengen Information System.
Disse indberetninger, der kun kan anvendes inden for Schengenstaternes område, foretages af de pågældende nationale myndigheder og er uden for Rådets kompetence.
These alerts, that are only applicable within the territory of the Schengen States, are entered by the relevant national authorities and are outside the Council's competence.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5676/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5676/08
På Den Afrikanske Unions 11. ordinære forsamling i Sharm El-Sheikh i Egypten den 30. juni-1. juli 2008 blev der vedtaget en beslutning om Kommissionens rapport om misbrug af princippet om universel jurisdiktion (dok.
In the Eleventh Ordinary Session of the Assembly of the African Union, (in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 30 June to 1 July 2008), a Decision was adopted on the report of the Commission on the Abuse of the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction (Doc.
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, hvilke reaktioner der har været på denne erklæring.
Could the Commission explain what have been the reactions to this statement?
Hvad vil Kommissionens holdning være, særlig i lyset af det nuværende europæiske Sirene-system?
What will be the Commission's position, particularly in view of the European SIRENE system presently in force?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5677/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5677/08
Om: Godtgørelse af udgifter i forbindelse med sygdomsrisici
Subject: Health reimbursement
Jeg skriver til Dem for at klage over den urimeligt lange tid, Kommission bruger på at løse et valgkredsproblem i min valgkreds, South of England.
I am writing to you to complain about the embarrassing amount of time the Commission is taking to resolve a constituency issue in my constituency, the South of England.
For seks år siden kontaktede jeg Kommissionen udgifter i forbindelse med sygdom i Belgien, som en af mine britiske vælgere, hr. Nickalls, skulle afholde.
Six years ago I contacted the Commission regarding Health costs in Belgium incurred by one of my UK Constituents, Mr Nickalls.
Kommissionen oplyste mig om, at hr. Nickalls havde ret til den modtagne sygdomsbehandling, og at den britiske regering skulle overtage udgifterne på 50.000 franc fra Belgien.
I was informed by the Commission that Mr Nickalls was entitled to the health treatment received and the UK Government should pick up the health costs from Belgium of 50 000 francs.
Kommissionen gik derefter videre til at inddrive udgifterne, og seks år senere er hr. Nickalls ikke rask og over 80 år gammel.
The Commission then proceeded to recover these costs and six years later Mr Nickalls is in poor health and over 80 years of age.
Jeg ville være taknemmelig. hvis De vil undersøge sagen og underrette mig om, hvornår der kommer en løsning på den.
I would be grateful if you would investigate this case and inform me when it will be resolved.
Min vælger og hans familie hævder med rette, at seks år er urimelig lang tid til at forvalte en fordring.
My constituent and his family rightly argue that six years is unreasonable to administer a claim.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5678/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5678/08
Om: Franske grænser for import af tobak ad luftvejen fra tredjelande
Subject: French limits on tobacco importation by air from third countries
Medlemmer af Parlamentet har indtrængende opfordret Kommissionen og Rådet til at finde en løsning på den forvirring, der for øjeblikket opstår hos internationale flypassagerer, når de rejser ind i EU fra lande uden for EU, fordi de kan få deres væsker, geléer etc., som de har købt i toldfrie butikker, konfiskeret, når de ankommer til EU-lufthavne i henhold til lufthavnssikkerhedsregler.
Members of the European Parliament have been urging the Commission and the Council to find a solution to the current confusion encountered by international air travellers entering the EU from non-EU countries arising from the possibility of having their liquids, gels, etc. purchased in duty- free shops confiscated when arriving at EU airports under airport security rules.
Rejsende, som ankommer til EU i dag, har lov til at beholde deres toldfrie væsker, hvis den første lufthavn, de ankommer til, er deres endelige destination, men de skal give afkald på deres væsker, hvis de er i transit.
Travellers arriving in the EU today are allowed to keep their duty-free liquids if their first airport of arrival is their final destination, but will have to forfeit their liquids if transferring.
Omvendt må en rejsende i henhold til de nye franske toldregler, hvis den pågældende ankommer til en fransk lufthavn som den endelige destination, kun medbringe to pakker toldfrie cigaretter, men må tage en ubegrænset mængde med, hvis vedkommende er i transit til en anden destination uden for Frankrig.
Conversely, under the new French customs rules, if a traveller arrives at a French airport as his final destination, he will only be allowed to bring in 2 packs of duty free cigarettes but will be allowed to carry any quantity with him if he is transferring to another destination outside of France.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5679/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5679/08
Om: EU-direktiv om dyreforsøg
Subject: EU Directive on Animal Testing
Har Kommissionen fastsat en ny frist for revisionen?
Has the Commission set a new deadline for this review?
Forventer Kommissionen endvidere stadigvæk, at resultaterne af den undersøgelse, der udføres i henhold til Parlamentets skriftlige erklæring 0040/2007 om primater i videnskabelige eksperimenter, foreligger sidst i oktober?
In addition, is the Commission still expecting the results on the research conducted for the European Parliament's Written Declaration 0040/2007 regarding primates in animal testing to be ready by the end of October?
Vil Kommissionen derefter fastsætte en frist for afvikling af primater i dyreforsøg?
Will the Commission then establish a deadline for the phasing out of primates in animal testing?
Er Kommissionen ikke enig i, at det med den nuværende teknologi, vi har til rådighed, er på tide at finde alternative løsninger på anvendelsen af dyr til forsøg?
Finally, does the Commission not agree that, with the current technology available to us, it is now time to find alternative solutions to using animals in experiments?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5680/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5680/08
Om: Ligestilling mellem kommissærer og modellen med Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol
Subject: Gender equality of Commissioners and the model of the European Court of Human Rights
Uligheder mellem kønnene er et problem, der er tydeligt i alle grene af EU.
Gender inequality is a problem evident in all branches of the EU.
F.eks. er kun 9 af de 27 EU-kommissærer kvinder.
For example, currently only 9 of the 27 European Commissioners are women.
Da man i Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol bemærkede et lignende problem blandt dens dommere, vedtog man en beslutning med henblik på at løse problemet.
When the European Court of Human Rights noticed a similar problem amongst their judges, they passed a resolution aimed at solving the problem.
Jeg mener, at Kommissionen bør overveje at følge Menneskerettighedsdomstolens eksempel i dette spørgsmål.
I believe that the Commission should consider following the Court's lead on this matter.
Domstolen består af et antal dommere svarende til antallet i de kontraherende stater (for øjeblikket 46).
The Court is composed of a number of judges equal to that of the Contracting States (currently 46).
Dommerne vælges af Europarådets Parlamentariske Forsamling, som stemmer på en liste med tre kandidater, som regeringerne forelægger.
Judges are elected by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which votes on a shortlist of three candidates put forward by governments.
I sin beslutning 1366 (2004) om Kandidater til Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol , som blev vedtaget i mødeperioden i januar 2004, besluttede Forsamlingen, at den ikke længere ville tage lister over kandidater til Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol i betragtning, som ikke omfattede mindst én kandidat af hvert køn.
In its Resolution 1366(2004) on Candidates for the European Court of Human Rights , adopted during the January 2004 part-session, the Assembly decided that it would no longer consider lists of candidates for the European Court of Human Rights which did not include at least one candidate of each sex.
Reglen blev ændret et år senere med beslutning 1426 (2005) for at åbne mulighed for lister med kandidater af det samme køn, forudsat at de var fra det køn, der var underrepræsenteret i Menneskerettighedsdomstolen, dvs. for tiden kvinder.
This rule was changed a year later through Resolution 1426(2005) to allow for uni-sex candidate lists, provided they were from the underrepresented sex on the Court, i.e. currently women.
Status quo er således på nuværende tidspunkt, at ethvert land, der udarbejder en liste over tre kandidater til stillingen som dommer i Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol, skal medtage mindst én kvinde på listen, således at Den Parlamentariske Forsamling i det mindste har mulighed for at vælge en kvindelig dommer med henblik på at forbedre ligevægten mellem kønnene i Menneskerettighedsdomstolen.
The status quo is thus currently that every country drawing up a list of three candidates for the post of judge on the European Court of Human Rights must include at least one woman on its list so that the Assembly has at least a chance to elect a female judge, with a view to improving the gender balance in the Court.
Hvad gør Rådet for øjeblikket for at forbedre kønsbalancen mellem kommissærerne? —
What is the Council currently doing to improve the gender balance of Commissioners? —
Agter Rådet at vedtage en beslutning i lighed med Menneskerettighedsdomstolens beslutning, således at flere kvinder bliver taget i betragtning som kandidater til Kommissionen?
Could the Council adopt a resolution similar to that of the Court of Human Rights so that more women are considered as candidates to the Commission?
Rådet minder om, at ligestilling mellem kønnene er et grundlæggende princip i EF-traktaten.
The Council recalls that gender equality is a fundamental principle enshrined in the EC Treaty.
Hvad mere præcist angår underrepræsentationen af kvinder i Kommissionen henledes det ærede parlamentsmedlems opmærksomhed på det faktum, at medlemsstaterne hver især beslutter, hvem de foreslår som kommissær.
As regards more precisely the under-representation of women in the Commission, the Honourable Member’s attention is drawn to the fact that Member States decide individually on the person they wish to propose as Commissioner.
I henhold til artikel 214, stk. 2, andet led: »vedtager Rådet med kvalificeret flertal og efter fælles overenskomst med den indstillede formand listen over de øvrige personer, som det foreslår udnævnt til medlemmer af Kommissionen; listen udarbejdes i overensstemmelse med hver enkelt medlemsstats indstilling.«
Indeed, according to Article 214(2), second subparagraph: ‘The Council, acting by a qualified majority and by common accord with the nominee for President, shall adopt the list of the other persons whom it intends to appoint as Members of the Commission, drawn up in accordance with the proposals made by each Member State.’
Endelig henviser Rådet til sine konklusioner Rådets konklusioner om gennemgang af medlemsstaternes og EU-institutionernes gennemførelse af Beijinghandlingsprogrammet: Kvinders deltagelse i den politiske beslutningsproces.
Finally, the Council refers to its conclusions Council conclusions on the review of the progress of the implementation by the Member States and the EU institutions of the Beijing Platform for Action: Women in political decision-making.
9670/08. af 9. juni 2008 om kvinders deltagelse i den politiske beslutningsproces.
9670/08. of 9 June 2008 on the subject of women in political decision-making.