natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kan Rådet oplyse, om det har truffet eller agter at træffe foranstaltninger for at sikre, at Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas, Sakharov-prisvinder fra 2002, vil blive indbudt den 2. juni til receptionen i anledning af Italiens nationaldag, der vil blive afholdt på den italienske ambassade i Havana?
Can the Council state in particular whether it has taken or intends to take measures to ensure that Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas, the 2002 Sakharov Prize laureate, will be invited on 2 June to the reception in commemoration of the Italian national day which will be held at the Italian embassy in Havana?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1393/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1393/05
Om: Cuba — Sveriges nationaldag
Subject: Cuba — Swedish National Day
Ved Rådet, hvilket standpunkt den svenske regering konkret indtager med hensyn til indbydelser til dens ambassade i Havana af cubanske demokrater og dissidenter i den nærmeste fremtid?
Can the Council provide information on the concrete position of the Swedish Government regarding the issuing of invitations in the near future to Cuban democrats and dissidents to the Swedish embassy in Havana?
Kan Rådet oplyse, om det har truffet eller agter at træffe foranstaltninger for at sikre, at Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas, Sakharov-prisvinder fra 2002, vil blive indbudt den 6. juni til receptionen i anledning af Sveriges nationaldag, der vil blive afholdt på den svenske ambassade i Havana?
Can the Council state in particular whether it has taken or intends to take measures to ensure that Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas, the 2002 Sakharov Prize laureate, will be invited on 6 June to the reception in commemoration of the Swedish national day which will be held at the Swedish embassy in Havana?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1394/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1394/05
Om: Grønbog om økonomisk migration og EUMC
Subject: Green Paper on economic immigration and the EUMC
Den 11. januar 2005 i Strasbourg præsenterede Kommissionen en grønbog om økonomisk migration.
On 11 January 2005 in Strasbourg, the Commission presented a Green Paper on economic migration.
Kommissionen ser gerne, at der indføres et »green card«-system med De Forenede Staters ordning som forbillede.
It wishes to introduce a ‘green card’ system modelled on the system operated by the United States.
Dokumentet indeholder fremfor alt en række spørgsmål, som forelægges for medlemsstaterne, virksomheder og fagforeninger.
The document mainly consists of questions to the Member States, businesses and trade unions.
I juli 2005 skal der afholdes en offentlig høring, og mod udgangen af 2005 vil Kommissionen forelægge forslag om fælles indrejseregler for økonomiske migranter (De Standard, 11. januar 2005, og De Tijd, 12. januar 2005).
It states that in July 2005 a public hearing is to be held and that at the end of 2005 the Commission will propose common rules on the admission of economic migrants ( De Standaard , 11 January 2005, and De Tijd , 12 January 2005).
Skønt medlemsstaterne endnu finder det »alt for tidligt« med en egentlig europæisk indfaldsvinkel til økonomisk migration, viste EU's ministre for retlige og indre anliggender sig den 24. februar 2005 villige til at tilstræbe en fælles ordning for legal — økonomisk — migration.
Although the Member States still consider it ‘far too soon’ to adopt a genuine European approach to economic migration, the EU Ministers for Home Affairs and Justice stated on 24 February 2005 that they were willing to work towards common rules on legal — economic — migration.
I grønbogen om økonomisk migration beskæftiger Kommissionen sig bl.a. med vandrende arbejdstageres retsstilling.
Among the points which the Commission considers in the Green Paper on economic migration is the legal status of immigrant workers.
Den stiller følgende spørgsmål: Hvilke særlige rettigheder bør man give tredjelandsstatsborgere, der arbejder midlertidigt i EU?
It asks the following questions: What specific rights should be granted to third‑country nationals working temporarily in the EU?
Bør et mindsteophold være en betingelse for at nyde visse rettigheder?
Should the enjoyment of certain rights be conditional on a minimum stay?
Hvis ja, hvilken varighed skal opholdet have?
If so, which rights and for how long?
Desuden kommer den i grønbogen ind på disse personers tilbagevenden (Kommissionens grønbog om en EU-metode til at styre økonomisk integration, KOM(2004)0811 af 11. januar 2005, s. 10-­11).
The Green Paper also considers these persons' return (Commission, Green Paper on an EU approach to managing economic migration, COM(2004)811, 11 January 2005, pp. 10‑11).
I marts 2005 offentliggjorde Det Europæiske Center for Observation af Racisme og Fremmedhad (EUMC) en rapport om EU-borgernes holdning til »mindretal«.
In March 2005, the EUMC published a report on the attitudes of EU citizens towards ‘minorities’.
Vil Kommissionen mod udgangen af 2005 forelægge forslag om fælles regler for økonomiske migranters indrejse?
Will the Commission propose common rules on the admission of economic immigrants at the end of 2005?
I hvilket omfang vil Kommissionen i bekræftende fald også tage hensyn til resultaterne af observationscentrets rapport, som viser den gennemsnitlige EU-­borgers holdning til spørgsmål såsom tildeling af rettigheder og tilbagesendelse af legale indvandrere?
If so, to what extent will the Commission also take account of the findings of the report by the EUMC, which indicate the views of the average EU citizen regarding such matters as granting of rights and repatriating legal immigrants?
Finder Kommissionen ikke, at også den almindelige EU-borgers stemme bør komme til orde i en sådan debat?
Ought not the opinions of ordinary EU citizens to count for something in such a debate?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1395/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1395/05
Om: Undersøgelse af de 15 gamle EU-medlemsstaters integrationspolitik
Subject: Study of the integration policies of the old 15 EU Member States
Den 21. marts 2005 præsenterede »British Council«, »Foreign Policy Centre« og »Migration Policy Group« resultaterne af en undersøgelse af integrationspolitikken for indvandrere i de 15 gamle EU-­medlemsstater.
On 21 March 2005, the British Council, the Foreign Policy Centre and the Migration Policy Group presented the findings of a study of policies geared to integrating immigrants in the 15 old EU Member States.
På vegne af »Migration Policy Group« anførte Jan Niessen, at Belgien i forhold til EU15-gennemsnittet klarer sig »bedst«.
On behalf of the Migration Policy Group, Mr Jan Niessen said that Belgium's performance was the ‘best’ in relation to the average for these States.
Af alle 15 undersøgte lande er det lettest at opnå statsborgerskab i Belgien, hvilket ifølge Niessen »fremmer integration og muliggør fuldstændig politisk deltagelse«.
Of all 15 countries considered, Belgium is the one where it is easiest to become naturalised, which according to Niessen encourages integration and makes full political participation possible.
Finansieres disse organer med midler fra Den Europæiske Union?
Are these bodies financed by the European Union?
Hvilke undersøgelser finansieres med midler fra Den Europæiske Union?
Were these studies financed by the European Union?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1396/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1396/05
Om: Udtalelser af Beate Winkler (EUMC)
Subject: Statements by Beate Winkler (EUMC)
I marts 2005 offentliggjorde Det Europæiske Center for Observation af Racisme og Fremmedhad (EUMC) en rapport om EU-borgernes holdning til »mindretal«.
In March 2005 the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) published a report on the attitudes of EU citizens towards ‘minorities’.
Heraf fremgår det, at halvdelen af de adspurgte er markant imod indvandring.
This indicated that half the respondents were opposed to immigration.
I rapporten henvises der til »indvandrerfjendske« og »racistiske« budskaber fra visse nationalistiske og populistiske politikere i Den Europæiske Union.
The report draws attention to the ‘anti-immigration’ and ‘racist’ messages of some nationalist and populist politicians in the European Union.
Det anføres, at usikkerhedsfølelsen i den brede offentlighed og mange europæeres negative holdning til »mindretal« forstærkes af disse politikeres budskaber kombineret med beretninger om kriminalitet begået af fremmede (rapportens s. 24-­25).
It is asserted that the sense of insecurity among the general public and a negative attitude to ‘minorities’ among many Europeans is accentuated by the messages of these politicians combined with reports on crimes committed by foreigners (pp. 24‑25 of the report).
Ifølge afgørelsen om oprettelse af EUMC har denne institution til opgave at gennemføre undersøgelser, udvikle metoder, offentliggøre årsrapporter og koordinere netværk.
According to the founding regulation of the EUMC, the organisation's tasks are to carry out research, develop methods, publish annual reports and coordinate networks.
Hvordan evaluerer Kommissionen Winklers udtalelse og rapportens afsnit om politiske partier og politikere?
What is the Commission's assessment of Mrs Winkler's statement and of the passage in the report dealing with political parties and politicians?
Finder Kommissionen ikke, at konklusionerne tydeligvis er politisk farvet?
Are not the conclusions manifestly politically biased?
Har politiske partier i Europa ikke ret til at udtale sig mod den tiltagende islamisering af Europa (rapport fra National Intelligence Council, Trends, 24. marts 2005)?
Do not political parties in Europe have the right to oppose the growing Islamisation of Europe (report by the National Intelligence Council, Trends, 24 March 2005)?
Hvad sigter Beate Winkler til med udtalelsen om, at »de politiske kredse« har et ansvar?
What does Mrs Winkler mean when she says that politicians have a responsibility?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1397/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1397/05
Om: Udvidelse af toldunionen EU-Tyrkiet
Subject: Expansion of EU-Turkey customs union
Den 25. marts 2005 meddelte Tyrkiet, at landet i anden halvdel af 2005 vil undertegne en toldprotokol med EU (De Tijd, 26. marts 2005).
On 25 March 2005, Turkey announced that in the second half of 2005 it would be signing a customs protocol with the EU ( De Tijd , 26 March 2005).
Med undertegnelsen af denne protokol udvides toldunionen mellem Tyrkiet og EU til de ti nye medlemsstater, herunder Cypern.
This will extend the customs union between Turkey and the EU to the 10 new Member States, including Cyprus.
Ifølge den tyrkiske udenrigsminister Abdullah Gül indebærer denne undertegnelse dog ingen udtrykkelig anerkendelse af Cypern.
However, according to Turkey's Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mr Abdullah Gül, the signature of the protocol does not imply that Turkey recognises Cyprus.
Ifølge dagbladet Luxemburger Wort vil Tyrkiet samtidig med undertegnelsen af protokollen demonstrativt erklære, at Tyrkiet ikke anerkender Republikken Cypern folkeretligt (Jat Keetman, Die Regierung Erdogan scheint Europa-müde, Luxembourger Wort, 26. marts 2005).
According to the Luxemburger Wort newspaper, when the Turks sign the protocol they will simultaneously demonstratively announce that Turkey does not recognise the existence of the Republic of Cyprus under international law (Jan Keetman, Die Regierung Erdogan scheint Europa-müde [The Erdogan government seems tired of Europe], Luxemburger Wort , 26 March 2005).
I maj 1997 udstedte de tyrkiske myndigheder retningslinjer for anvendelsen af alle disse begrænsninger.
In May 1997, the Turkish authorities issued guidelines for the application of all these restrictions.
I april 2002 opfordrede EU's udenrigsministre til ophævelse af disse begrænsninger.
In April 2002, the EU Ministers for Foreign Affairs called for these restrictions to be lifted.
Hvert skib fra en EU-­medlemsstat, der på den ene eller anden måde kan sammenkædes med Cypern, er underlagt voldsomme begrænsninger (Yiannakis Matsis, Turkey's measures on vessels serving the Cyprus trade, New Europa, 13.-19. marts 2005).
Any ship from an EU Member State which can be linked to Cyprus in any way is subject to severe restrictions (Yiannakis Matsis, Turkey's measures on vessels serving the Cyprus trade, New Europe, 13-19 March 2005).
I en tv-­tale anførte Abdullah Gül, at toldprotokollen kun drejer sig om fri bevægelighed for varer, og at Tyrkiet ikke er forpligtet til at åbne sine sø- og lufthavne for cyprioterne (The Wall Street Journal Europe, 30. marts 2005).
In a speech on television, Mr Abdullah Gül has said that the customs protocol relates only to the free movement of goods and that Turkey is not compelled to open its ports and airports to Cypriots ( The Wall Street Journal Europe , 30 March 2005).
Kommissionens talsmand Krisztina Nagy har udtalt, at Kommissionen betragter de tyrkiske begrænsninger som en overtrædelse af toldunionens bestemmelser.
The Commission's spokeswoman Mrs Krisztina Nagy has said that the Commission regards Turkey's restrictions on ships and aircraft as a violation of the customs union.
Hvilke tyrkiske handlinger og foranstaltninger er ifølge Kommissionen i strid med hvilke europæiske regler?
What actions and measures implemented by Turkey does the Commission consider to be contrary to what European provisions?
Hvordan vil Kommissionen reagere på Güls udtalelser og fortolkning?
How will the Commission respond to Mr Gül's statements and interpretation of the law?
Vil det udgøre en hindring for tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne i oktober 2005, hvis Tyrkiet eventuelt nægter at åbne sine sø- og lufthavne?
Does Turkey's possible refusal to open its ports and airports constitute an obstacle to accession negotiations in October 2005?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1399/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1399/05
Om: Projekt om forbedring af adgangen fra havet til havnen i Mutriku
Subject: Plan to improve sea-going access to the port of Mutriku
I 1999 udarbejdede direktoratet for det baskiske lokalstyres havne en »udviklingsplan for den nye havn i Mutriku«.
In 1999, the Basque Government’s Ports Directorate drew up a ‘Guideline plan for the new claims made by the Government’s Department of the Environment’.
Den 18. juli 2002 iværksattes projektet uden forudgående miljørisikovurdering, hvad der foranledigede sammenslutningen Hobetu Leike til at indgive en klage til Kommissionen.
On 18 July 2002, work on the scheme began without any EIA having been carried out, for which reason the Hobetu Leike association complained to the Commission.
Hvad har Kommissionen foretaget sig i denne anledning?
What action has the Commission taken on this issue?
Har Kommissionen henvendt sig til klagerne?
Has it contacted the complainants?
Har Kommissionen kendskab til de mulige skader, som projektet kan medføre for kulturarven og for levesteder for beskyttede arter?
Is the Commission aware of the possible damage which the project could cause both to historical heritage and to the habitat of protected species?
Den 29. juli 2004 vedtoges den positive afgørelse i det baskiske lokalstyres miljøudvalg vedrørende miljørisikovurderingen af planens første fase (den officielle tidende for Baskerlandet nr. 0205/­2004), hvilket var en overtrædelse af indholdet i den særlige plan, i henhold til hvilken vurderingen skulle gælde for den samlede plan.
On 29 July 2004, a resolution was adopted by the Basque Government’s Environmental Ministry endorsing the environmental impact statement for the first phase of the plan (Official Journal of the Basque Country No 0205/2004), thereby failing to comply with what had been laid down in the special plan with regard to the need for the EIA to cover the plan in its entirety.
Miljøministeriets generaldirektorat for kystområder under miljøministeriet godkender, at offentlige landarealer anvendes til projektets gennemførelse.
The Ministry of the Environment’s Directorate-General for Coastlines, for its part, endorses the assigning of public maritime onshore property, for the purposes of implementing the project in question.
Har Kommissionen kendskab til miljøministeriets godkendelse af et projekt, hvor den tilhørende miljørisikovurdering ikke er i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i den særlige plan?
Is the Commission of the Environment Ministry’s approval of the project whose EIA fails to meet the provisions of the special plan?
Den 9. marts 2005, da der blev indgivet en klage over den afgørelse, som generaldirektoratet for kystområder havde truffet, offentliggjorde det baskiske lokalstyre et offentligt udbud med henblik på tildeling af den forvaltningsretlige kontrakt for arbejderne i forbindelse med projektet.
On 9 March 2005, following the submission of an appeal against the Directorate-General for Coastlines’ resolution, the Basque Government’s Official Journal published the public competition for awarding the administrative contract for the project’s building work.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1400/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1400/05
Om: Indgåelse af offentlige kontrakter i forbindelse med projektet for omledning af Júcar-Vinalopó
Subject: Public procurement and the Júcar-Vinalopó water transfer
Den 21. oktober 1998 oprettede den spanske regering det statslige enkeltmandsselskabet Aguas del Júcar, Sociedad Anónima (AJUSA), med statslig kapital, kontrol og finansiering med henblik på indgåelse af aftale om, bygning og drift af enhver for vandbygningsarbejder.
On 21 October 1998, the Spanish Government set up the single member state company Aguas del Júcar, Sociedad Anónima (AJUSA), whose capital belongs to the government and which is governmentally controlled and funded, to acquire, construct and operate all kinds of water works.
Et af de projekter, der gennemføres, er »reguleringen af Júcar-Vinalopó, som samfinansieres af EU (Kommissionens beslutning af 22. december 2003).
One of the projects being carried out is the ‘Júcar-Vinalopó link’, which is in receipt of European co-funding (Commission Decision of 22 December 2003).
Er Kommissionen blevet orienteret om, at dette er en overtrædelse af direktiv 92/­50/­EF?
Has the Commission been informed of this fact, which involves the infringement of Directive 92/50/EC?
Erkender Kommissionen, at undladelsen af offentliggørelse af udbuddet i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende er en overtrædelse af direktiv 92/­50/­EF?
Is the Commission aware that the failure to publish in the Official Journal the tender notice under discussion infringes Directive 92/50/EC?
Hvad vil Europa-Kommissionen foretage sig i anledning af denne overtrædelse af fællesskabsretten?
What is it going to do in response to this infringement of Community law?
Mener Kommissionen, at overholdelse af fællesskabsbestemmelserne om offentlige markeder bør være et krav forud for enhver form for medfinansiering fra EU af omledningen af vandressourcer fra Júcar-floden til Vinalopó-floden?
Does the Commission believe that compliance with Community rules on public procurement is a necessary pre-condition for Community co-funding of the Júcar-Vinalopó water transfer project?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1401/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1401/05
af Horst Schnellhardt (PPE-DE)
by Horst Schnellhardt (PPE‑DE)
Om: Anvendelse af Den Europæiske Socialfonds (ESF) midler
Subject: Use of resources from the European Social Fund (ESF)
Repræsentanter fra Kommissionen har i år kontrolleret anvendelsen af midler fra ESF i Halle/­Saale, Augsburg og Halberstadt.
In 2005, representatives of the European Commission have monitored the use of resources from the European Social Fund in Halle/Saale, Augsburg and Halberstadt.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1402/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1402/05
af Manolis Mavrommatis (PPE-DE)
by Manolis Mavrommatis (PPE‑DE)
Om: Støtte til handel med levende kvæg
Subject: Subsidisation of trade in live bovine animals
Den Europæiske Union eksporterer årligt 200000 levende stykker kvæg til Mellemøsten.
The European Union exports 200000 live bovine animals to the Middle East every year.
I mange tilfælde overholdes fællesskabslovgivningen vedrørende transport af levende dyr dog ikke med det resultat, at dyrenes velfærd ikke beskyttes under rejsen.
However, Community legislation on the transport of livestock is frequently flouted, so that their welfare is not protected during the journey.
Desuden har Compassion In World Farming (CIWF) og European Coalition for Farm Animals (ECFA) afsløret, at de fleste dyr plages og til sidst slås ihjel uden bedøvelse, når de når frem til deres bestemmelsessted, idet de europæiske myndigheder ikke har mulighed for at gribe ind, efter at dyrene er solgt i et land uden for EU.
Furthermore, Compassion in World Farming (CIWF) and the European Coalition for Farm Animals (ECFA) have found that most animals are maltreated and finally slaughtered without being stunned, upon arrival at their destination, and the European authorities have no means of intervening after the delivery of animals to a country outside the EU.
Eftersom EU yder støtte til denne handel, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende: Har Kommissionen til hensigt at revidere denne støtte, da det ikke er muligt at føre kontrol med, om de etiske regler for slagtning af de pågældende dyr overholdes?
Given that this trade is subsidised by the EU, does the Commission intend to review these subsidies if it is impossible to monitor compliance with ethical rules on the slaughter of the animals in question?
Overvejes det at lade dyrene slagte inden for EU, så slagtekroppene derefter kan eksporteres til disse lande, for så vidt som medlemsstaterne kan garantere, at slagtningen sker i overensstemmelse med de islamiske forskrifter?
Is any consideration being given to the possibility of slaughtering the bovine animals within the EU and exporting the carcasses to the countries concerned, assuming the services of the Member States are able to guarantee that the animals are slaughtered in accordance with the requirements of Islamic law?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1403/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1403/05
Om: Afsætning på det græske marked af fordærvet yoghurt
Subject: Defective yoghurt on Greek market
I februar og marts 2005 er der på det græske marked samt på andre landes markeder solgt fordærvet yoghurt af græsk oprindelse, uden at de ansvarlige myndigheder rettidigt har vurderet risikoen for den offentlige sundhed og fået den under kontrol samt aktiveret det hurtige varslingssystem for at advare forbrugerne og Kommissionen.
In February and March 2005, defective yoghurts made by a Greek company were marketed in Greece and other countries without the responsible authorities assessing or managing the risk to public health or activating the rapid alert system to notify consumers and the Commission.
Resultatet af, at problemet i dagevis var blevet holdt skjult, var, at der kom falske informationer i omløb, hvad angår risikoen ved de pågældende fødevarer og mængden heraf, der var kommet ind på det nationale marked og andre landes markeder.
The result of concealing the problem for days was that ambiguous information began to circulate as to the danger posed by the food concerned and the quantity supplied to the domestic market and markets in other countries.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvorfor de ansvarlige græske myndigheder ikke har aktiveret det hurtige varslingssystem på grundlag af artikel 50 i forordning (EF) nr. 178/­2002, og om den mener, at dette er en overtrædelse af forordningen?
Can the Commission say why the competent Greek authorities did not activate the rapid alert system pursuant to Article 50 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and whether it considers that failure to constitute an infringement of the regulation?
Hvad er generelt Kommissionens vurdering, hvad angår den korrekte gennemførelse i Grækenland af lovgivningen om fødevaresikkerhed?
What is the Commission's general assessment of whether Greece correctly implements food safety legislation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1404/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1404/05
Om: Genmodificerede fødevarer og afgrøder
Subject: GM foods and crops