natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Rådet har dog ikke specifikt drøftet dette spørgsmål.
The Council has not however specifically discussed this issue.
Retten til at oprette og indmelde sig i fagforeninger og deltage i fagforeningsaktiviteter er udtrykkeligt fastsat i artikel 22 i den internationale konvention om borgerlige og politiske rettigheder og er en af de grundlæggende rettigheder, som EU søger at beskytte og fremme i hele verden.
The right to form and join trade unions and engage in trade union activity is explicitly laid down in Article 22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and is among the fundamental rights which the EU seeks to protect and promote worldwide.
Rådet vil fortsætte med at følge situationen i Panama nøje og vil rejse spørgsmålet over for myndighederne i Panama som led i sine løbende kontakter og ved enhver passende lejlighed.
The Council will continue to follow the situation in Panama closely and will raise this issue with its authorities in the framework of its ongoing contacts and on every appropriate occasion.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-6001/2010
Question for written answer E-6001/2010
Er Kommissionen vidende om de indberettede tilfælde af undertrykkelse den 8. juli 2010 i området Bocas del Toro i Panama, hvor seks personer blev dræbt, og vil den anmode Panamas præsident, Ricardo Martinelli, om at undersøge disse dødsfald på behørig vis og retsforfølge de ansvarlige?
Is the Commission aware of the reported acts of repression on 8 July 2010 in the Bocas del Toro Province of Panama, in which six people were killed, and will it call on Panama’s President, Ricardo Martinelli, to investigate these deaths properly and bring to justice those responsible?
Kan Kommissionen ligeledes fordømme den nye lov 30 i Panama, som underminerer retten til at strejke og til foreningsfrihed og straffer arbejdstagere, der demonstrerer i gaderne, med op til to års fængsel.
Can the Commission also condemn the new Law 30 in Panama, which undermines the right to strike and freedom of association, and penalises workers who take their protests to the streets with up to two years in prison?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-6002/2010
Question for written answer E-6002/2010
Om: Bestemmelser i Schengenreglerne
Subject: Provisions of the Schengen acquis
Et af resultaterne af den europæiske integration er, at der er skabt mulighed for grænseoverskridende mobilitet.
One of the achievements of European integration is enabling crossborder mobility.
Schengenkonventionen, som indeholder bestemmelser om fjernelse af kontrolsteder ved grænserne mellem medlemsstater, har spillet en rolle i den henseende.
The Schengen agreement, which provides for the removal of checkpoints at borders between Member States, has played a key role in that regard.
I løbet af det seneste år har Bulgarien gjort væsentlige fremskridt i retning af gennemførelse af Schengenreglerne og navnlig Schengeninformationssystemet.
Over the past year, Bulgaria has made significant progress towards implementation of the Schengen acquis and particularly the Schengen information system.
Hvad mener Rådet om Bulgariens fremskridt med hensyn til forberedelserne til at tiltræde Schengenområdet?
What is the view of the Council on Bulgaria’s progress in preparation for joining the Schengen area?
Hvilken tidsramme forudser Rådet for afskaffelse af intern kontrol både ved vejgrænser og for lufttransport?
What time frame does the Council envisage for the abolition of internal controls both on road borders and for air transport?
Afgørelsen vil blive truffet, efter at det i overensstemmelse med de relevante Schengen-evalueringsprocedurer er blevet sikret, at de nødvendige betingelser for gennemførelse af alle de pågældende regler er opfyldt.
This decision will be taken, in accordance with the applicable Schengen evaluation procedures, after verification that the necessary conditions for the application of all parts of the acquis concerned have been met.
På baggrund af Bulgariens erklæring om at være parat til, at Schengenevalueringen kunne påbegyndes, blev der aftalt en tidsplan for evalueringsbesøgene på de relevante evalueringsområder.
Taking into consideration the declaration of readiness for starting the Schengen Evaluation submitted by Bulgaria, a calendar was agreed setting the periods for the evaluation missions in the relevant evaluated fields.
Foreløbig overholdes tidsplanerne for evalueringsbesøgene og de relevante administrative og retlige procedurer.
For the time being the timeframes of the evaluation missions and the relevant administrative and legal procedures are observed.
Der finder i øjeblikket fortsat evalueringsbesøg sted i Bulgarien.
At present, evaluation missions are still ongoing in Bulgaria.
Det er for tidligt at foregribe Rådets holdning til dette spørgsmål.
It would be premature to anticipate the position the Council will take in this matter.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-6003/2010
Question for written answer E-6003/2010
Zuzana Roithová (PPE) og Paul Rübig (PPE)
Zuzana Roithová (PPE) and Paul Rübig (PPE)
Om: Indførelsen af et lovgrundlag i EU for beskyttelse af certificeringsmærker
Subject: Introduction of an EU legal framework for protection of certification marks
Vi er overbevist om, at indførelse af et fælles lovgrundlag i EU for certificeringsmærker ville tilvejebringe et uvurderligt redskab for det indre marked og give europæiske iværksættere en ubetinget komparativ fordel vis-a-vis konkurrenter fra tredjelande.
We are convinced that the creation of an EU single legal framework for certification marks would provide an invaluable tool for the internal market, giving European entrepreneurs an unquestionable comparative advantage vis-à-vis competitors from third countries.
Det ville ikke kun give en standard for IPR-beskyttelse i hele EU for certificeringsmærker, skabe fælles regler for certificering, garantere kvalitets- og sikkerhedsmærker og tilvejebringe effektive våben mod efterligninger, som misbruger certificeringsmærker, men det ville også sikre, at der med brugen af disse mærker kunne opnås det ønskede niveau af sikkerhed for europæiske forbrugere.
Not only would it afford a Europe-wide standard of IPR protection for certification marks, create common rules for certification, guarantee quality and safety marks, and provide additional effective weapons against counterfeited goods that abuse certification marks, but it would also ensure that the use of such marks achieves the desired level of safety for European consumers.
EU's certificeringsmærkesystem ville give yderligere beskyttelse, ud over hvad der i øjeblikket ydes af de kollektive EF‑varemærker.
The EU certification mark system would provide additional protection to that currently afforded by collective Community Trade Marks.
Vi bør bestræbe os på at etablere en beskyttelsesordning for certificeringsmærker på EU‑plan på linje med dem, der udvikles i USA eller Det Forenede Kongerige, hvor sådanne ordninger giver certificeringsmærker samme grad af beskyttelse som intellektuel ejendomsret (ophavsretligt beskyttede værker, opfindelser, varemærker).
We should endeavour to establish a protection scheme for certification marks at EU level along the same lines as those that have been developed in the USA or the UK, where such schemes afford certification marks the same level of protection as any intellectual property (copyright works, inventions, trade marks).
I mange tilfælde er forfalskning, misbrug af certificeringsmærker og snyltervirksomhed, ikke kun i EU, men også på andre kontinenter, i øjeblikket ikke underlagt sanktioner, fordi de ikke er dækket af national lovgivning i mange medlemsstater.
In many cases, counterfeiting, misuse of certification marks and free-riding, not only in the EU but also on other continents, are not currently subject to sanctions because they are not covered by the national laws of many Member States.
Vores forslag ville ikke medføre yderligere finansielle forpligtelser, da ordningen kunne administreres af Kontoret for Harmonisering i Det Indre Marked (OHIM), men det ville udvide omfanget af retsbeskyttelse for virksomheder mod illoyal konkurrence, og det kunne hjælpe virksomhederne med at udbrede deres standarder på en nemmere måde gennem licensaftaler med andre iværksættere.
Our proposal would not involve additional financial commitments, as the scheme could be run by the Office of Harmonisation for the internal market (OHIM), but it would expand the scope of legal protection for businesses against unfair competition and it could help companies to disseminate their standards more easily through licensing agreements with other entrepreneurs.
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe med hensyn til ikkeharmoniserede varemærker i Europa?
What steps and measures will the Commission take with regard to non-harmonised certification marks in Europe?
Agter Kommissionen at stille forslag om et nyt fælles retsgrundlag for beskyttelse af varemærker i EU under OHIM?
Does the Commission intend to propose a new single legal framework for protection of certification marks in the EU, under the remit of the OHIM?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-6004/2010
Question for written answer E-6004/2010
Theodoros Skylakakis (PPE) og Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy (ALDE)
Theodoros Skylakakis (PPE) and Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy (ALDE)
Om: Fejlslagne internationale projekter i EU's emissionshandelsordning
Subject: Failure of international offsets in the EU Emissions Trading System
Det skønnes, at 84,3 % af alle godkendte emissionsreduktioner (CER) opgivet i 2009 stammede fra hydroflourcarbon- (HFC) og dinitrogenoxidprojekter (N 2 0) (data fremlagt under arrangementet »Internationale projekter i EU's emissionshandelssystem«, der blev organiseret af GLOBE, CDM Watch, EIA og Sandbag den 14. juli 2010 i Europa-Parlamentet med tilstedeværelse af repræsentanter for Kommissionen).
It is estimated that 84.3 % of all certified emission reductions (CERs) surrendered in 2009 were from hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) and nitrous oxide (N 2 0) projects (data presented during the ‘International offsets in the EU ETS’ event, organised by GLOBE, CDM Watch, EIA and Sandbag on 14 July 2010 at the European Parliament in the presence of Commission representatives).
Det skønnes ligeledes, at destruktionen af HFC-23 kan udføres for blot 0,17 EUR pr. ton CO 2‑ ækvivalent (FN's Klimapanel og Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, »Special Report on Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System« (særlig rapport om beskyttelse af ozonlaget og det globale klimasystem) om problemer i forbindelse med hydroflourcarbon og perfluorcarbon 2005)) .
It is also estimated that the destruction of HFC-23 can be carried out at a cost of just EUR 0.17 per tonne of CO 2 equivalent (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, Special Report on Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System: Issues Related to Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluocarbons, 2005).
Når denne destruktion vareliggøres og sælges som CER på markedet for EU's emissionshandelsordning (ETS), opnås der imidlertid helt op til 12 EUR, dvs. ca. 70 gange mere, end det koster at tilintetgøre gassen.
However, when this destruction is commoditised and sold as CERs on the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) market, it can easily command as much as EUR 12, i.e. around 70 times more than it costs to destroy the gas.
Dette betyder, at den europæiske forbruger — som finansierer mekanismen for bæredygtig udvikling (CDM) gennem betalinger for tjenester og produkter, der producerer drivhusgasemissioner — via dette system betaler 12 EUR for noget, som er 0,17 EUR værd!
This means that the European consumer — who is financing the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) through payments for services and products generating greenhouse gas emissions — pays through this system EUR 12 for something that is worth EUR 0.17!
For at drage fordel af de uventede fordele, der således skabes i Kina, opkræver den kinesiske regering en afgift på 65 % på alle HFC-23 CER.
In order to take advantage of the windfall profits thus created in China, the Chinese Government is imposing a 65 % levy on all HFC-23 CERs.
CDM-projekter skaber ca. 55 mio. CER, som således giver en indtægt på 536 mio. EUR pr. år.
CDM projects generate approximately 55 million CERs thus producing revenue of EUR 536 million per year.
Idet der tages højde for, at: 1.
Taking into consideration that: 1.
1 t HCFC-22 vil producere ca. 0,03 t HFC-23, og HCFC-22 er en kraftig drivhusgas, som frembringes på bekostning af alternative teknologier, 2.
one tonne of HCFC-22 will produce around 0.03 tonnes of HFC-23, and HCFC-22 is a potent greenhouse gas that is being produced at the expense of alternative technologies, 2.
overskuddet fra HFC-23‑projekter medfører en overproduktion af billig HCFC-22, hvilket underminerer bestræbelserne i henhold til Montrealprotokollen til udfasning af HCFC, 3.
the profits to be made from HFC-23 projects are resulting in overproduction of cheap HCFC-22, undermining the efforts under the Montreal Protocol to phase out HCFCs,
et enkelt anlæg i Indien (Gujarat Flourochemicals) i 2007 havde en CDM-indtjening på 66 mio. EUR fra 6,5 mio. CER — nok til at destruere hele verdens årlige produktion af HFC-23,
3. in 2007, a single plant in India (Gujarat Fluorochemicals) had CDM revenue of EUR 66 million from 6.5 million CERs — enough for the destruction of all HFC-23 produced annually throughout the world,
hvad mener Kommissionen så om dette store misbrug af de europæiske forbrugeres penge?
what is the position of the Commission on this gross misuse of European consumers’ money?
Hvilke skridt agter Kommissionen at tage for at sætte en stopper for denne miljømæssigt skadelige og økonomisk skandaløse praksis?
What action does the Commission intend to take to end immediately this environmentally harmful and economically scandalous practice?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-6005/2010
Question for written answer E-6005/2010
Om: Kommissionens anmodning om flere migranter
Subject: Commission's call for more migrants
Den 14. juli blev det meddelt, at EU's kommissær for indre anliggender Cecilia Malmström havde anmodet om flere »vandrende arbejdstagere for at sikre vores økonomiske overlevelse« og at afhjælpe »manglen på arbejdskraft« med immigranter fra lande uden for EU.
On 14 July it was reported that EU Home Affairs Commissioner Cecilia Malmström had called for more ‘immigrant workers in order to secure our economic survival’ and to fill ‘labour shortages’ with immigrants from outside the EU.
Hvorfor er det trods fri bevægelighed i EU nødvendigt at opfordre til yderligere indvandring fra lande uden for EU på grund af arbejdsløshedstal på ca. 20 % i nogle medlemsstater?
Why, despite freedom of movement facilities in the EU, is it necessary to invite further migration from non-EU countries, given levels of unemployment of around 20 % in some member nations?
Har Kommissionen gjort sig den ulejlighed at undersøge, hvilke økonomiske konsekvenser det ville få i de afrikanske lande, hvis de mister deres faglærte arbejdskraft?
Has the Commission bothered to enquire what economic damage might be done to African countries by stripping them of their skilled labour?
Har Kommissionen overvejet, i hvor høj grad lønningerne vil blive undermineret af billig oversøisk arbejdskraft?
Has the Commission considered the extent to which wages will be undermined by cheap overseas labour?
Er det Kommissionens hensigt at reducere EU's lønsatser, således at de svarer til udviklingslandenes lønsatser?
Is it the purpose of the Commission to reduce EU labour rates to those of developing countries?
Kommissær Malmström siger, at hun fortsat vil træffe foranstaltninger med henblik på en mere inkluderende indvandringspolitik for EU i de kommende år.
Commissioner Malmström says she ‘will continue to take more steps towards a more inclusive labour migration policy for the EU in the coming years’.
Hvad mener hun i denne sammenhæng med »inkluderende«?
What does she mean, within this context, by ‘inclusive’?
Er Kommissionen klar over, at indvandrere bliver ældre?
Does the Commission appreciate that immigrants grow old?
Logikken er, at hver ny indvandringsrunde nødvendigvis følges af en ny yngre generation.
The logic is that each new round of immigration must be followed by another, younger generation.
Er et af målene med disse nye forslag at fremskynde den tid, hvor Europas egne borgere reduceres til minoritetsstatus og til sidst fordrives fra deres fædrelande, hvor de har boet i årtusinder, til fordel for nye borgere fra Afrika og andre steder?
Is one purpose behind these new proposals to hasten the time when the indigenous European population will be reduced to minority status and eventually dispossessed of and displaced from their ancestral homelands, which they have inhabited for millennia, by the newly created citizens from Africa and elsewhere?
Accepterer Kommissionen, at dette sker?
Does the Commission accept that this will occur?
Hvornår foretog Kommissionen undersøgelser for at klarlægge EU's medlemsstaters synspunkter med hensyn til sine politikker, og hvilke kriterier blev anvendt?
When did the Commission carry out surveys to ascertain the views of the indigenous communities in respect of its policies, and what criteria were employed?
Hvornår forventer Kommissionen, at dens politikker om befolkningsvandring og fordrivelse af egne befolkningsgrupper vil skabe ufred og forvirring uden fortilfælde, og hvilke foranstaltninger overvejer Kommissionen af foreslå til bekæmpelse heraf?
At what point does the Commission expect its policies of population movement and displacement of the indigenous communities to create strife and disorder on an unprecedented scale and what action does the Commission consider it might propose to combat such?
Mener forslagsstillerne af disse indvandringspolitikker, at de i sidste instans selv kan blive holdt ansvarlige af vrede indfødte befolkningsgrupper for den rolle, de har spillet i undermineringen af de oprindelige europæiske folkeslags nationale kulturarv?
Do the proponents of these immigration policies consider that they may ultimately themselves be called to account by enraged indigenous communities for the role that they have played in the erosion of the national cultures and heritages of the indigenous peoples of Europe?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-6006/2010
Question for written answer E-6006/2010
Om: Indvandring til Europa
Subject: Migration into Europe
Kommissionen bedes besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
Will the Commission kindly advise: 1.
Hvor mange nye indvandrere forventer den, at EU skal acceptere i løbet af de næste 20 år fra lande uden for EU? 2.
how many new migrants from outside the EU it envisages that the EU should accept over the next 20 years? 2.
I hvor stor udstrækning opmuntrer multinationale selskaber til indvandring fra lande uden for EU? 3.
the extent to which multinational corporations are encouraging migration from outside the EU? 3.
Hvilke erklæringer modtager Kommissionen eller dens underorganer og agenturer fra multinationale selskaber med hensyn til at støtte og fremme indvandring fra lande uden for EU?
what representations the Commission or its subsidiary bodies and agencies receive from multinational corporations to support and encourage migration from outside the EU?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-6007/2010
Question for written answer E-6007/2010
Judith A. Merkies (S&D) og Vittorio Prodi (S&D)
Judith A. Merkies (S&D) and Vittorio Prodi (S&D)
Om: Konsekvensanalyser i forbindelse med knappe materialer
Subject: Impact assessments in relation to scarce materials
Ressourceeffektivitet er med rette et af EU's flagskibe i arbejdsprogrammet 2010‑2014 og senere.
Resource efficiency is rightly one of the flagships of the EU in the work programme 2010‑14 and beyond.
Alle politikker og fremtidige projekter bør baseres på en effektiv og forsigtig anvendelse af ressourcer.
An efficient and prudent use of resources should be at the root of all policies and all future projects.
Denne politik skal derfor tydeligvis afspejles på det grundlæggende niveau, dvs. i konsekvensanalyserne.
Therefore this policy evidently needs to be reflected at the basic level, i.e. in impact assessments.
I konsekvensanalyserne bør konsekvensen af politikken om knaphed, ressourceanvendelse og grad af genanvendelse måles.
In the impact assessments, the impact of the policy on scarcity, resource use and renewability should be measured.
Desuden bør det mest effektive mål tages i betragtning.
In addition, the most efficient goal should be taken into account.
Er anvendelsen af denne særlige ressource til denne politik den mest hensigtsmæssige, og er andre industriers mål mere ufordelagtige på grund af øget anvendelse til det, der kunne vise sig at være mindre væsentlige mål?
Is the use of this specific resource for this policy the most appropriate, and are other industries' goals disadvantaged by increased use for what might prove to be less essential goals?
Kan Kommissionen tage højde for ressourceeffektivitet i konsekvensanalysen af politikker?
Can the Commission take resource efficiency into account in the impact assessments of policies?
Kan Kommissionen tage højde for ressourceeffektivitet i udbudsbekendtgørelser?
Can the Commission take resource efficiency into account in the publishing of tenders?
Kan konsekvensen af anvendelse af en bestemt ressource måles på den samlede globale tilgængelighed/knaphed af materialet?
Can the impact of the use of a particular resource on total global availability/scarcity of the material be measured?
Kunne der i konsekvensanalysen tages højde for alternative materialer?
Could the impact assessment take the use of alternatives into account?
Visse knappe ressourcer kan muligvis finde bedre anvendelse end ved at følge politikken eller den vurderede anvendelse.
Perhaps certain scarce resources can be put to better use than by pursuing the policy or use assessed.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-6008/2010
Question for written answer E-6008/2010
Om: Anvendelighed af FN‑konventionen om handicappedes rettigheder for Europaskolerne
Subject: Applicability of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to the European Schools
Artikel 24 i FN‑konventionen om handicappedes rettigheder (UN CRPD), som er ved at blive ratificeret af EU — eftersom Det Europæiske Råd allerede har besluttet at ratificere konventionen — garanterer børns ret, uanset deres handicap, til at modtage fælles undervisning eller undervisning inden for integrationsprojekter på samme skole, uanset typen og graden af deres handicap.
Article 24 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD), which is in the process of being ratified by the EU — since the European Council had already made the decision on ratification of the Convention — guarantees the right of all children — regardless of their disability — to learn together or within integrative projects in the same school, regardless of the type and degree of disability.
Europaskolerne overholder i øjeblikket ikke denne artikel, da de ikke leverer alle de nødvendige tilpasninger (herunder tilpassede indlæringsprogrammer) til alle typer af indlæringsvanskeligheder (se også Europa-Parlamentets andragende 1402/2009).
The European Schools are currently not in compliance with this article, as they do not provide all necessary adaptations (including adapted learning programmes) for all kinds of learning disabilities (see also EP Petition No 1402‑2009).