natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvor mange mia. råder nødfonden over, og hvordan er de tilvejebragt?
How many billions of euros are available in the emergency fund, and from which appropriations are they taken?
Hvem træffer afgørelse om tildelingen af midler fra fonden, og hvad er forudsætningerne herfor?
Who decides on the distribution of money from the fund, and by what conditions is this governed?
Er der knyttet betingelser til EU-støtten fra fonden?
Is EU aid from the fund subject to obligations?
Hvis ja, hvilke, og hvem kontrollerer, om de bliver opfyldt?
If so, what are they, and who makes sure they are fulfilled?
Hvilke konsekvenser vil det få, hvis betingelserne ikke bliver opfyldt?
What would the consequences be in the event of such obligations not being fulfilled?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2100/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2100/10
Regionerne og landene langs Donau, som immervæk løber gennem otte EU-medlemslande og seks ikkemedlemslande, ønsker at knytte sig tættere sammen økonomisk og kulturelt i fremtiden uden i den forbindelse at skabe nye retsbestemmelser eller institutioner eller bruge yderligere finansielle midler.
The regions and countries along the Danube (which flows through eight EU Member States and six non-Member States) plan to improve their economic and cultural connections in future without the need for new legislation or institutions and with no additional funding.
Der skal i stedet benyttes allerede eksisterende EU-midler til regionen, for perioden 2007‑2013 er regionen tilsyneladende blevet tildelt EU-midler i størrelsesordenen 95 mia EUR.
Existing EU funds for the region, which apparently received 95 billion euros for the period 2007‑13, would be used.
Hvor længe har denne region modtaget EU-støtte, og hvor meget er der udbetalt indtil nu?
Since when has this region been receiving EU funding, and how much has it received?
Hvordan er midlerne fordelt på projekter, lande og regioner?
How are the funds divided between projects, countries and regions?
Hvilke synergieffekter forventer man for erhvervslivet, videnskab osv.?
What synergetic effects is this expected to have on the economy, science, etc?
Hvilke lignende projekter og strategier findes der i EU ud over Donaustrategien?
What other, similar projects and strategies exist within the EU, apart from the Danube strategy?
Hvad er der til dato opnået som led i disse projekter?
What has been achieved so far with these projects?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2101/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2101/10
Om: »Slettede« i Slovenien
Subject: ‘Erased people’ in Slovenia
Efter Sloveniens uafhængighedserklæring i 1991 gav Ljubljana borgere fra andre jugoslaviske delrepublikker en frist på seks måneder til at ansøge om slovensk statsborgerskab.
Following Slovenia’s declaration of independence in 1991, Ljubljana gave citizens from other former Yugoslav republics six months to apply for Slovenian citizenship.
I 1992 blev ca. 25 600 personer, som havde overskredet fristen, uden varsel slettet fra personregistret og var således uden rettigheder.
In 1992 some 25 600 people, who had missed the deadline, were deleted from the population register without warning and left with no rights.
Der lever stadigvæk tusindvis af disse »slettede« i Slovenien, og de har ingen gyldige papirer.
Thousands of such ‘erased people’ still live in Slovenia but have no valid papers.
De berørte var pludselig ulovlige udlændinge, de mistede deres rettigheder i forhold til arbejdsløsheds-, syge- og socialforsikring, og de blev forment adgang til uddannelsessystemet.
They were suddenly illegal aliens, lost their right to employment, sickness and social security benefits and were not allowed access to the education system.
Den slovenske indenrigsminister har meddelt, at »ingen vil få noget forærende, der vil ikke blive betalt erstatning, ikke givet statsborgerskab eller valgret« med den nye lov.
The Slovenian Minister of the Interior has stated that the new law would ‘not provide handouts: there will be no compensation, citizenship or right to vote’.
Hvad er EU's holdning til, at ca. 25 600 personer uden varsel blev slettet fra personregistret i 1992, da fristen på de seks måneder var udløbet?
How does the EU view the fact that in 1992, when the six-month deadline passed, some 25 000 people were deleted without warning from the population register?
Hvordan vurderer Kommissionen den slovenske indenrigsministers udtalelse?
What is the Commission’s assessment of the statement made by the Slovenian Minister of the Interior?
Vil Kommissionen forsøge at bearbejde Slovenien, så der bliver betalt erstatning til personer, der er blevet særligt hårdt ramt?
Will the Commission attempt to ensure that compensation payments are made in cases of hardship?
Arbejdes der fra EU's side på at påvirke Slovenien med hensyn til AVNOJ-reglerne?
Is the EU endeavouring to influence Slovenia with regard to the AVNOJ provisions?
Hvorvidt mener Kommissionen, at uretfærdige regler som AVNOJ og Benesdekreterne er forenelige med EU-retten og menneskerettighederne, bl.a. også med hensyn til de indrømmelser, der er gjort i Lissabontraktaten?
To what extent does the Commission consider such unlawful provisions as the AVNOJ and the Beneš Decrees, inter alia , to be compatible with EC law and human rights, especially with regard to the concessions made in the Lisbon Treaty?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2103/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2103/10
Om: Opfordring til jihad mod Schweiz — reaktionen fra EU's højtstående repræsentant for udenrigsanliggender og sikkerhedspolitik
Subject: Call for jihad against Switzerland — reaction of the High Representative
Ifølge medierne kommenterede EU's højtstående repræsentant for udenrigsanliggender, Catherine Ashton, den libyske revolutionsleder Muammar Gaddafis opfordringer til jihad mod Schweiz med at sige, at det var et »uheldigt tidspunkt«.
According to media reports, the reaction of Catherine Ashton, head of EU foreign policy, to calls by the Libyan revolutionary leader Gaddafi for a jihad against Switzerland was that this was an ‘unfortunate moment’.
Hendes talsmand finder udtryksmåden »usædvanlig«.
Her spokesman considered her wording to be ‘unusual’.
På baggrund af denne særprægede reaktion vil jeg gerne stille følgende spørgsmål: 1.
In the light of this unconventional reaction, I would like to know the following: 1.
Er disse udtalelser virkelig udtryk for den højtstående repræsentants holdning? 2.
Is this really the High Representative’s opinion? 2.
Hvad siger formanden for Kommissionen til disse upassende udtalelser? 3.
What is the view of the President of the Commission on this inappropriate comment? 3.
Påtænker den højtstående repræsentant at tage diplomatiske skridt for at forhindre, at Gaddafis ord bliver fulgt op af handling? 4.
Does the High Representative intend to take diplomatic steps to prevent Gaddafi’s words being followed up with action? 4.
Hvis ja, hvordan vil disse skridt mere konkret se ud?
If so, what form will these steps take?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2104/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2104/10
Om: Statsgarantier til jernbanevirksomheder
Subject: State guarantees for railway undertakings
Kommissionen vedtog den 30. april 2008 (2008/C 184/07) retningslinjerne for statsstøtte til jernbaneselskaber, med hvilke den gennemfører reglerne for fortolkning og anvendelse af støttelovgivningen inden for jernbanesektoren.
On 30 April 2008 the Commission adopted guidelines on state aid for railway undertakings (2008/C 184/07), thereby introducing rules on the interpretation and implementation of the law on aid in the railway sector.
Efter Kommissionens opfattelse er disse ikke forenelige med EF‑traktaten på et marked, der er åbent for konkurrence.
In the Commission’s view this is contrary to the EC Treaty in a competitive market.
Desuden opfordres medlemsstaterne til skriftligt at bekræfte, at de accepterer de foreslåede hensigtsmæssige foranstaltninger senest et år efter retningslinjernes offentliggørelse, dvs. senest den 22. juli 2009 (retningslinje nr. 127).
The Member States are also asked to provide written confirmation of their agreement with the recommended appropriate measures no later than one year after publication of the guidelines, i.e. by 22 July 2009 (guideline No 127).
I hvilke medlemsstater mener Kommissionen, at det er nødvendigt at iværksætte hensigtsmæssige foranstaltninger, fordi der er givet ubegrænsede statsgarantier til jernbanevirksomheder?
In which Member States does the Commission consider it necessary to take appropriate measures as a result of unlimited State guarantees being granted to railway undertakings?
Hvilke foranstaltninger træffer eller har Kommissionen truffet for at sikre, at ulovlige statsgarantier til jernbanevirksomheder i henhold til disse retningslinjer bliver afskaffet senest den 22. juli 2010?
What steps is the Commission taking — or has it taken — to ensure that improper state aid for railway undertakings will be terminated by 22 July 2010, as set out in these guidelines?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2105/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2105/10
Om: Manglende nøjagtighed ved indsamling af data i forbindelse med CO 2 -bøder til bilproducenter
Subject: Inaccurate data collection for CO 2 fines imposed on car manufacturers
Fra og med 2010 skal en bilproducent betale bøde, hvis alle nyindregistrerede biler, som han har solgt i EU, i gennemsnit udleder mere end 130 g CO 2 /km.
Starting in 2010, car manufacturers will have to pay a fine if all the newly registered cars they have sold in the EU emit on average more than 130 g of CO 2 per kilometre.
For at udregne denne gennemsnitsværdi, bliver forskellige dataposter fra medlemsstaterne analyseret.
Various sets of data from the Member States are analysed in order to calculate this average value.
Det tyske institut Ökopol har observeret, at man særligt i lande i Syd- og Østeuropa har arbejdet upålideligt i forbindelse med indsamlingen og bearbejdningen af disse data i de senere år.
The German Ökopol institute has observed a lack of reliability in the collection and processing of such data in recent years, particularly in southern and eastern European countries.
Nogle gange blev oplysningerne i indregistreringspapirerne overført forkert til databasen, eller de blev ikke kontrolleret korrekt.
Data have sometimes been incorrectly transferred from vehicle documents into the data bank or not properly checked.
De lagrede oplysninger afviger i gennemsnit 1 g fra det, producenten har angivet.
The recorded data generally vary by the order of one gram from manufacturers’ data.
Hvad kan Kommissionen gøre, så oplysningerne bliver indsamlet korrekt i fremtiden?
What can the Commission do to ensure accurate data collection in future?
Hvem hæfter, hvis de nationale indregistreringsmyndigheder har sendt forkerte oplysninger til Bruxelles?
Who is responsible in the event of incorrect data being sent to Brussels by national accreditation bodies?
Kan de medlemsstater straffes, som ikke har udført dataindsamlingen korrekt?
Can penalties be imposed on Member States which have not collected data correctly?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2106/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2106/10
Om: Τyrkiske krænkelser i Det Ægæiske Hav
Subject: Turkish violation of Greek airspace over the Aegean Sea
Fredag den 19. marts var et fly fra Frontex, der patruljerede over det østlige Ægæiske Hav for at opspore illegale immigranter, udsat for en provokatorisk tyrkisk chikane, og søndag den 22. marts var en helikopter fra Frontex udsat for en anden chikane.
A Frontex aircraft patrolling the Eastern Aegean for illegal immigrants was intercepted by Turkish aircraft on Friday, 19 March 2010, while a Frontex helicopter was also intercepted on Sunday, March 21, 2010.
Lidt efter kl. 8 om morgenen om fredagen fløj to tyrkiske F‑16 jagere i en afstand på knap en sømil forbi en græsk helikopter fra kystvagten, der fløj for Frontex, mens den befandt sig 200 m nord for Farmakonisi, og i går, søndag, fløj de tyrkiske fly hen over Farmakonisi.
The first of these incidents of provocation occurred soon after 8 a.m. on Friday, 19 March, when two Turkish F-16 aircraft approached to within one nautical mile of a helicopter belonging to the Greek coastguard service which was patrolling on behalf of Frontex 200 meters north of Pharmakonisi.
Hvordan vurderer den Tyrkiets opførsel i forbindelse med forhandlingerne om optagelse i EU?
How will the Commission assess Turkey's behaviour in connection with the negotiations on accession to the European Union?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2107/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2107/10
Om: Salg af Grækenlands Telekommunikationsselskab (OTE) til Deutsche Τelekom (DT)
Subject: Sale of the Hellenic Telecommunications Organisation (OTE) to Deutsche Telekom (DT)
Kommissionen har endelig efter 18 måneders gentagne forespørgsler og andragender fra berørte borgere anerkendt, at salget af OTE til DT er problematisk.
After eighteen months, during which there has been a constant stream of questions and petitions from members of the public whose interests have been adversely affected, the Commission has finally recognised that the sale of the Greek telecommunications provider OTE to Deutsche Telekom was problematic.
Nærmere bestemt betonede den nye kommissær for det indre marked, Michel Barnier, i sit afslørende svar (P‑0249/2010) om salget af OTE til DT, at Kommissionen har sendt en skrivelse til Grækenlands faste repræsentation i EU, og at det ser ud til, at bestemmelserne i direktivet om offentlige overtagelsestilbud (direktiv 2004/25/EF) ikke er blevet anvendt korrekt, især de bestemmelser, der omhandler beskytelse af mindretalsaktionærer, og at medlemsstaternes mulighed for at fravige omtalte bestemmelser er blevet fortolket for omfattende.
The new Commissioner responsible for the internal market, Michel Barnier, specifically stated, in the very instructive reply he gave to a parliamentary question (P‑0249/10) about the sale of OTE to Deutsche Telekom, that the Commission had sent a letter to the Permanent Representation of Greece to the EU, that it appeared that the provisions of the Takeover Bids Directive (2004/25/EC), including the provisions on the protection of minority shareholders, had not been implemented correctly, and that the possibility for Member States to derogate from those provisions had been interpreted too broadly.
Hvem er ansvarlig for at sørge for, at OTE's bestyrelse afholder sig fra ekstraordinære dispositioner, inden der er fundet en endelig løsning på sagen?
Who is responsible for ensuring that the OTE board does not ‘engage in operations of an exceptional nature’ until the whole transaction is finally concluded?
Har Kommissionen modtaget svar fra den græske regering, eftersom der allerede er gået fem måneder siden afsendelsen af skrivelsen?
Has the Commission received a reply from the Greek Government to the letter it sent five months ago?
I bekræftende fald, hvad agter den græske regering at foretage sig?
If so, what action does the Greek Government intend to take?
I benægtende fald, hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe?
If not, what action does the Commission intend to take?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2108/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2108/10
Om: Tjekkiets operationelle program for forskning, udvikling og innovation — 2007‑bevillinger
Subject: Czech Operational Programme Research and Development for Innovation — the 2007 allocation
Som følge af den forsinkede gennemførelse af det operationelle program i starten af programmeringsperioden blev det besluttet at ophæve programmets 2007‑bevilling og i stedet øge 2008‑bevillingen.
As a consequence of the delay in the implementation of this Operational Programme at the beginning of the programming period, it was negotiated to nullify the programme's allocation for 2007 and to increase adequately the allocation for 2008.
Bevillingerne for 2008 blev dermed nærmest fordoblet i henhold til n+3‑reglerne, som skal anvendes i 2011.
Thus, the allocation for 2008 nearly doubled with the n+3 rule applicable in 2011.
Det yderligere tidspres, som lægges på det operationelle program for forskning, udvikling og innovation, er fuldt ud i overensstemmelse med EU's kommende 2020-strategi, hvor støtte til forskning og udvikling repræsenterer et væsentligt initiativ under første søjle »intelligent vækst«.
Putting the OP R & DI under further time pressure is most unfortunate as the value added of projects supported by the OP R & DI is very high and fully in accordance with the forthcoming Europe 2020 Strategy, where R & D support represents one of the flagship initiatives under its first pillar ‘smart growth’.
I lyset af ovennævnte procedure og 2008 bevillingerne til de operationelle programmer for forskning, udvikling og innovation bedes Kommissionen redegøre for sin holdning til forslaget om at tildele de oprindelige bevillinger for 2007 til automatisk frigørelse de efterfølgende år?
With respect to the abovementioned procedure and the current allocation of the OP R & DI for 2008, what is the Commission's opinion as regards the proposal to distribute the original allocation of the year 2007 — for the purpose of the calculation of automatic decommitment — in subsequent years?
Er Kommissionen enig i, at de operationelle programmer for forskning, udvikling og innovation vil blive stillet dårligere sammenlignet med andre operationelle programmer, og at der er behov for at finde en løsning?
Does the Commission share the view that the OP R & DI would become highly disadvantaged in comparison to other operational programmes and that this situation strongly necessitates adoption of a solution?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2109/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2109/10
Om: Krydstogtskibes sikkerhed
Subject: Cruise vessel security and safety
Jeg har fået oplyst, at Repræsentanternes Hus i USA for nylig har vedtaget et lovforslag fra 2009 om krydstogtskibes sikkerhed.
It has been brought to my attention that the House of Representatives in the United States of America has recently passed the Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act 2009.
Planlægger Kommissionen at indføre en lignende lovgivning i EU og forbedre sikkerheden for passagerer og besætningsmedlemmer om bord på krydstogtskibe i Europa?
Does the Commission have any plans to introduce similar legislation across the EU and improve the security and safety of passengers and crew on board cruise vessels in Europe?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2111/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2111/10
af Marietje Schaake (ALDE) , Alexander Graf Lambsdorff (ALDE) og Sophia in 't Veld (ALDE)
by Marietje Schaake (ALDE) , Alexander Graf Lambsdorff (ALDE) and Sophia in ’t Veld (ALDE)
Om: Reproduktive rettigheder i Tyrkiet og udlandet
Subject: Reproductive rights in Turkey and abroad
Det tyrkiske sundhedsministerium har for nylig (6. marts 2010) meddelt en lovændring, der tillader straf af kvinder, som rejser til udlandet, herunder Europa, for at blive kunstigt befrugtet.
Recently (6 March 2010) the Ministry of Health in Turkey announced a law change that would allow punishment of women who travel abroad, including to Europe, for artificial insemination.
Den Tyrkiske nationalforsamling har hverken drøftet eller stemt om denne lovændring.
This change in the law was not debated or voted on in the Turkish Grand National Assembly.
Kunstig befrugtning er ulovlig i Tyrkiet.
Artificial insemination is officially illegal in Turkey.
Indtil nu har kvinder imidlertid haft mulighed for at rejse til udlandet med henblik på in vitro-fertilisering.
However, until now women were able to travel abroad to receive in vitro fertilisation (IVF).
Med den nye lov kan kvinder idømmes mellem et og tre års fængsel, hvis de rejser til udlandet med henblik på in vitro-fertilisering.
With the new law, a punishment of one to three years in prison can be invoked for women travelling abroad for IVF.
Ifølge kvindegrupper vil den seneste udvikling især betyde en tilbagegang for så vidt angår de fremskridt, der er opnået de seneste år for at sikre kvinders selvbestemmelse over deres egen krop, seksualitet og reproduktive rettigheder. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8568733.stm).
According to women's rights groups, this recent development severely sets back the progress that has been made in recent years to allow women autonomy over their body, sexuality and reproductive rights. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8568733.stm).
Hvorledes forholder Rådet sig til denne lovændring?
What is the Council's view on this recent change in the law?
Mener Rådet, at ændringen i den tyrkiske lovgivning vil skabe yderligere uoverensstemmelser i forhold til de europæiske bestemmelser?
Does the Council consider that this change in Turkish law will lead to further divergence from European standards?
Er Rådet villig til at rejse spørgsmålet over for den tyrkiske regering?
Is the Council willing to address this issue with the Turkish Government?
Rådet er opmærksom på den lovændring, som det ærede medlem henviser til.
The Council is aware of the legislative amendment referred to by the Honourable Members.
På dette stadium er det imidlertid ikke i stand til at kommentere dens specifikke bestemmelser.
However, at this stage, it is not in a position to comment on its specific provisions.
Generelt er Rådets holdning til principperne om demokrati og menneskerettigheder, herunder kvinders rettigheder, meget klar.
In general terms, the position of the Council regarding the principles of democracy and human rights, including women's rights, is very clear.
Som kandidatland skal Tyrkiet opfylde de politiske Københavnskriterier, herunder institutionernes stabilitet, der garanterer retsstaten og menneskerettighederne.
As a candidate country, Turkey has to meet the Copenhagen political criteria, including the stability of institutions guaranteeing the rule of law and human rights.
I overensstemmelse med den forhandlingsramme, der blev vedtaget i 2005, forventer EU, at Tyrkiet støtter reformprocessen og arbejder hen imod en yderligere forbedring med hensyn til principperne om frihed, demokrati og retsstatsforhold og respekten for menneskerettighederne og de grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder og befæster og udvider lovgivnings- og gennemførelsesforanstaltningerne i relation til bl.a. kvinders rettigheder.
In line with the Negotiating framework adopted in 2005, the Union expects Turkey to sustain the process of reform and to work towards further improvement in respect of the principles of liberty, democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and to consolidate and broaden legislation and implementation measures in relation to, inter alia , women's rights.
Tyrkiets fremme af kvinders rettigheder udgør desuden en af de prioriteter påkortsigt, der er fastsat i det reviderede tiltrædelsespartnerskab.
Furthermore, the promotion of women's rights by Turkey forms one of the short-term priorities enshrined in the revised Accession Partnership.
Rådet bekræftede siden i sine konklusioner af 8. december 2009, at det for at sikre, at Tyrkiet opfylder Københavnskriterierne fuldt ud, er nødvendigt med yderligere bestræbelser på en række områder, herunder med hensyn kvinders rettigheder.
More recently, the Council in its conclusions of 8 December 2009 reaffirmed that further efforts to ensure that Turkey fully meets the Copenhagen criteria are required in a number of areas, including women's rights.
Det ærede medlem kan være sikker på, at situationen på stedet nøje overvåges og evalueres.
The Honourable Members can be assured that close monitoring and evaluation of the situation on the ground is ongoing.
Kommissionen overvåger nøje fremskridtene og rapporterer regelmæssigt til Rådet.
Progress continues to be closely monitored by the Commission, which reports regularly on it to the Council.
Spørgsmålet om menneskerettighederne vil fortsat blive bragt op på alle niveauer, hvor det er hensigtsmæssigt, som det skete på det seneste politiske dialogmøde den 10. februar 2010 og på mødet i associeringsudvalget den 26. marts 2010.
The issue of human rights will continue to be raised at all levels as appropriate, as was the case in the latest political dialogue meeting held on 10 February 2010, as well as at the Association Committee meeting of 26 March 2010.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2112/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2112/10
af Marietje Schaake (ALDE) , Alexander Graf Lambsdorff (ALDE) og Sophia in 't Veld (ALDE)
by Marietje Schaake (ALDE) , Alexander Graf Lambsdorff (ALDE) and Sophia in 't Veld (ALDE)