natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Om: Gennemførelse af EU-retten i forbindelse med erstatning til ofre for forbrydelser og disses stilling
Subject: Transposition of European legislation on the standing and compensation of victims of crime
Kan Kommissionen angive, hvilke EU-medlemsstater der i den nationale lovgivning har gennemført rammeafgørelsen om ofres stilling i forbindelse med straffesager og direktiv 2004/80/EF EUT L 261 af 6.8.2004, s. 15. om erstatning til ofre for forbrydelser?
Can the Commission say which EU Member States have transposed into their national law the Council framework decision of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings OJ L 82, 22.3.2001 . and Directive 2004/80/EC OJ L 261, 6.8.2004, p.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2307/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2307/08
Om: Forværring af de spanske korrespondenters situation i Marokko
Subject: Deterioration in conditions for Spanish journalists in Morocco
De spanske korrespondenters situation i Marokko er blevet stadig forværret gennem de sidste seks måneder, hvilke hindrer dem i at udføre deres arbejde ordentligt.
For six months now, the conditions for Spanish journalists in Morocco have been in a state of constant deterioration and they have been prevented from working normally.
Korrespondenterne har i flere måneder klaget over presset fra de marokkanske myndigheder som følge af dækningen af konflikten i det vestlige Sahara.
The reporters have been complaining for months at the pressure brought to bear by the Moroccan government over coverage of the Western Sahara conflict.
De modtog i første omgang mundtlige advarsler vedrørende indholdet af deres reportager og er efterfølgende blevet udsat for pres og blevet truet med udvisning.
First came oral warnings concerning the content of their work, and then coercion and threats of expulsion.
Besynderligt nok har andre udenlandske tv-stationer fået denne tilladelse uden store vanskeligheder, hvilket tyder på, at der er tale om en sand offensiv rettet mod de spanske medier.
Curiously, other foreign channels have had no major difficulties as regards their licenses, and this suggests that there is a campaign going on targeted directly on the Spanish media.
Den seneste episode til dato, der illustrerer denne krænkelse af rettigheder, vedrører tilbagetrækningen af akkrediteringen for korrespondenten tilknyttet radiostationen Cadena COPE og truslen om udvisning af Cadena SER's og dagbladet La Vanguardias korrespondent.
The most recent episodes in this onslaught on basic rights are the refusal to issue a press card to the correspondent of the COPE channel and the threat of expulsion against the journalist representing the SER channel and the La Vanguardia newspaper (both are women).
De marokkanske myndigheder har begrundet disse foranstaltninger med, at disse to journalister som led i deres arbejde har deltaget i en debatkonference, der blev organiseret af Palma de Mallorcas støtteforening for det sahariske folk, og som blev afholdt på Mallorca, med andre ord uden for marokkansk territorium.
The reason is that both, in the course of performing their duties, took part in an event organised in Majorca, in other words not on Moroccan territory, by the Saharan People's Association of Palma (Majorca).
Hvorledes kan Kommissionen i lyset af ovenstående forklare, at Kongeriget Marokko vanskeliggør, eller endog i visse tilfælde forhindrer de journalister, der er tilknyttet anerkendte medier, i at varetage deres oplysningsformidlende opgaver?
In view of the above, can the Commission explain on what grounds Morocco is making it difficult, if not impossible, for journalists from reputed media organs to do their job of providing information?
Kan Kommissionen anmode de marokkanske myndigheder om oplysninger om den forskelsbehandling, som de spanske journalister udsættes for, henset til at journalister fra andre lande ikke udsættes for en sådan forskelsbehandling?
Will the Commission make representations to the Moroccan authorities concerning this discrimination against Spanish journalists, given that similar things are not happening to professionals of other nationalities?
Hvorledes agter den at gribe ind over for de kompetente myndigheder i Kongeriget Marokko for at sikre, at korrespondenterne kan udøve deres erhverv på samme vilkår som andre akkrediterede internationale journalister i Marokko?
What action will the Commission take with the relevant Moroccan authorities to ensure that these journalists can exercise their profession in the same conditions as all other accredited international journalists in Morocco?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2308/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2308/08
Om: Europæiske supermarkedskæders forskelsbehandling af eksportører af frugt og grønt i EU
Subject: Discrimination against Community fruit and vegetable exporters by supermarket chains in the EU
I løbet af de seneste produktionsår 2006 og 2007 har nogle supermarkeder i EU, som importerer frisk frugt og grønt med oprindelse i EU, under påskud af at ville beskytte forbrugernes helbred stillet urimelige og uvidenskabelige krav angående sporbare pesticidrester.
During the previous marketing years of 2006 and 2007, and on the pretext of protecting the health of consumers, some EU supermarkets importing fresh fruit and vegetables of Community origin made unreasonable and unscientific demands concerning detectable pesticide residues.
Tilsvarende produkter, der importeres fra tredjelande (f.eks. Marokko, Chile osv.), er imidlertid ikke underlagt samme begrænsninger.
Moreover, the corresponding products imported from third countries (e.g. Morocco, Chile, etc.) are not subject to the same restrictions.
Denne situation har medført, at varer med oprindelse i EU lider under en ulige konkurrence.
The result of this situation is that exportable Community produce suffers unfair competition, which is ultimately detrimental to European producers and exporters.
I lyset af den grundlæggende betydning, som eksport af frisk frugt og grønt har for EU's økonomi, samt det faktum, at det nye produktionsår allerede er begyndt, bedes Kommissionen oplyse: 1.
In view of the fundamental importance of fresh fruit and vegetable exports to the EU economy and the fact that the new marketing year has begun, will the Commission say: 1.
hvordan den påtænker at reagere på supermarkedskædernes tilfældige handlinger, som har pålagt Fællesskabets eksport ensidige begrænsninger, som er i strid med alle konkurrencebegreber, og 2.
how it intends to respond to the arbitrary actions of supermarket chains which impose unilateral restrictions on Community exports, in violation of any notion of competition, and 2.
hvilke foranstaltninger den vil træffe, for at give forbrugerne korrekte oplysninger om fødevaresikkerhed, som nu bringes i fare pga. visse personers tilfældige handlinger.
what measures it will take to provide the consuming public with correct information on food safety, which is jeopardised by the arbitrary actions of certain individuals?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2309/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2309/08
Om: Følgevirkningerne af reformen af markedsordningen for sukker
Subject: Collateral consequences of the reorganisation of the sugar regime
Ifølge de seneste oplysninger vil reformen af markedsordningen for sukker føre til tab af 5,64 millioner t sukkerkvoter i de tre sidste produktionsår, dvs. 94 % af det reduktionsmål, som Kommissionen har fastlagt for udgangen af 2009.
According to the latest data, the reorganisation of the sugar regime will result in the loss of 5.64 million tonnes of sugar quotas during the last three marketing years, i.e. 94 % of the reduction set by the Commission as a target for the end of 2009.
En særlig alvorlig følgevirkning af Kommissionens reformbestræbelser er, at Europa vil gå fra at være den største eksportør af hvidt sukker i verden til at blive den næststørste importør efter Rusland, og at over 75 sukkerproduktionsanlæg vil blive lukket, og at omkring 10 000 arbejdspladser vil gå tabt.
‘Collateral’ but particularly serious consequences of the Commission's attempted reorganisation are that Europe will be turned from the leading white sugar exporter in the world into the second biggest importer after Russia, that more than 75 sugar production plants will close down and some 10000 jobs will be lost.
I lyset af de igangværende forhandlinger på multilateralt og bilateralt niveau bedes Kommissionen oplyse følgende: 1.
In the light of the negotiations taking place at multilateral and bilateral level, will the Commission say: 1.
Vil kvoterne blive yderligere reduceret som følge af en eventuel aftale indgået inden for rammerne af Verdenshandelsorganisationen under Doharunden? 2.
whether the quotas will be reduced further by any possible agreement in the World Trade Organisation during the Doha Round, and 2.
Er Kommissionen enig i, at det i sidste ende ville være at foretrække at undlade at indgå en aftale frem for at indgå en »dyr aftale« for sukkersektoren og for landbrugssektoren generelt?
whether it subscribes to the view that, in the case of the sugar sector and agriculture in general, a ‘non-agreement’ would ultimately be preferable to an ‘onerous agreement’?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2310/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2310/08
Om: Placering og beslutning om oprettelse af reguleringsagenturer
Subject: Location and rationale for establishment of regulatory agencies
Formanden for Europa-Parlamentets Budgetkontroludvalg, Herbert Bösch, ser en direkte sammenhæng mellem et EU-agenturs placering og det faktum, at den tildelte medlemsstat har støttet »vanskelige sager«.
Herbert Bösch, Chairman of the European Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control, makes a direct link between the location assigned to an EU agency and the Member State which is the beneficiary giving its consent over sensitive issues.
Således hedder det i en artikel i den østrigske avis Die Presse med overskriften »EU-agenturer: Vi har brug for mere kontrol: Det er også en forstyrrende faktor for ham (Bösch), at det ikke lader til, at der er noget strategisk koncept bag EU-agenturerne.
According to an article in the Austrian daily Die Presse , under the headline ‘EU agencies: “We need more control”’: ‘He (Bösch) is also worried that there is “no perceptible rationale” behind the EU agencies, though one thing is clear: every Member State wants to have at least one.
Der er således ingen tvivl om, at antallet af organer, som i dag er 34, vil stige.« (25.5.2007)
And we can be certain that their number will not remain at 34. ’ (25.5.2007)
Den tjekkiske premierminister Mirek Topolanek mener ifølge medierne (Tagesecho: Tjekkiske standpunkter på EU-topmødet i Bruxelles, 15.12.2006), at ministerkollegaer i 2003 lovede, at nye agenturer ville blive placeret i de nye EU-lande.
Reports in the media (Tagesecho: Position of the Czechs at the Brussels EU Summit, 15.12.2006) also suggest that the Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek believes that his colleagues in the Council promised him, in 2003, that new agencies would be located in the new EU states.
På hvilke af Rådets møder — dato og sted for mødet — blev det endeligt besluttet, om de 29 reguleringsagenturer skulle oprettes, og hvor de skulle placeres?
At which Council meetings (date and location) was the final location and the establishment of the 29 regulatory agencies decided upon?
Hvilke andre emner stod der på dagsordenen for disse møder i Det Europæiske Råd?
What topics were also on the agenda at these meetings of the European Council?
Hvilke oplysninger kunne efter Rådets mening ligge til grund for den konstatering, at vanskelige sager blev belønnet med agenturer?
What evidence does the Council think there might be for the assertion that agencies were used as ‘rewards’ in connection with sensitive issues?
Hvornår og af hvem blev der givet lovning på, at nye agenturer skulle placeres i de nye medlemsstater?
When and by whom was the promise that new agencies would be located in the new Member States made?
Det ærede medlem gøres opmærksom på, at reguleringsagenturer oprettes fra sag til sag.
The Honourable Member is informed that regulatory agencies are established on a case-by-case basis.
Placeringen af det enkelte agentur vedtages derfor også fra sag til sag af medlemsstaterne efter fælles aftale.
Accordingly, the location of each agency is also decided on a case-by-case basis, by common agreement of the Member States.
Den 13. december 2003 traf repræsentanterne for medlemsstaterne, forsamlet på stats- og regeringschefniveau, efter fælles aftale afgørelse om hjemstedet for følgende af De Europæiske Fællesskabers kontorer og agenturer: Det Europæiske Politiakademi, Den Europæiske Fødevaresikkerhedsautoritet, Eurojust, Det Europæiske Agentur for Søfartssikkerhed, Det Europæiske Luftfartsikkerhedsagentur, Det Europæiske Jernbaneagentur, Det Europæiske Agentur for Net- og Informationssikkerhed, Det Europæiske Center for Forebyggelse af og Kontrol med Sygdomme og Det Europæiske Kemikalieagentur Afgørelse 2004/97/EF, Euratom truffet ved fælles aftale mellem repræsentanterne for medlemsstaterne, forsamlet på stats- og regeringschefniveau, den 13. december 2003, om fastlæggelse af hjemstedet for visse af Den Europæiske Unions kontorer og agenturer (EUT L 29 af 3.2.2004, s. 15). .
On 13 December 2003, the Representatives of the Member States, meeting at Head of State or Government level, decided by common agreement on the seats of the following offices and agencies of the European Union: the European Police College, the European Food Safety Authority, Eurojust, the European Maritime Safety Agency, the European Aviation Safety Agency, the European Railway Agency, the European Network and Information Security Agency, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and the European Chemicals Agency Decision 2004/97/EC, Euratom taken by common agreement between the Representatives of the Member States, meeting at Head of State or Government level, of 13 December 2003 on the location of the seats of certain offices and agencies of the European Union, OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p.
Placeringen af de andre agenturer blev besluttet således: —
As far as the other agencies are concerned, their location was decided as follows: —
På samlingen den 26.‑27. november 2003 bemyndigede Rådet Kommissionen til at fremføre Frankrig som værtsstat for ITER og Cadrache som placeringsmulighed for ITER, og besluttede, at Euratoms interne agentur skulle ligge i Spanien.
At its meeting on 26 and 27 November 2003, the European Council authorised the Commission to put forward France as the ITER host state and Cadarache as the ITER site and decided that the Domestic Agency for Euratom should be located in Spain.
Dagsordenen for denne samling findes på Rådets websted (15397/­03).
The full agenda of this meeting is available on the Council website (15397/03).
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2311/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2311/08
Om: Moms på salg af hash i Nederlandene
Subject: VAT on cannabis sales in the Netherlands
I Nederlandene findes der butikker med cannabisharpiks (hash) og marihuana, såkaldte coffee shops, hvor salg af disse varer er momspligtigt.
In the Netherlands, cannabis resin (hashish) and marijuana are on sale in what are known as ‘coffee shops’, and VAT is apparently charged on such sales.
Hvor stor en procentdel af Nederlandenes bidrag til EU-budgettet, og hvor stor en procentdel af det samlede EU-budget stammer fra moms fra salg af hash og marihuana i de nederlandske coffee shops?
What percentage of the Netherlands' contribution to the EU budget and what percentage of the overall EU budget does the VAT charged on sales of hashish and marijuana in Dutch ‘coffee shops’ account for?
De egne indtægter hidrørende fra merværdiafgiften (moms) afhænger i første omgang af beregninger, som medlemsstaterne foretager i henhold til Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1553/­89 Rådets forordning (EØF, Euratom) nr. 1553/89 af 29. maj 1989 om den endelige ordning for ensartet opkrævning af egne indtægter hidrørende fra merværdiafgiften ( EFT L 155 af 7.6.1989, s. 9 -13). .
The amount of own resources accruing from value added tax (VAT) relies in the first place on calculations made by the Member States pursuant, in particular, to Council Regulation No 1553/89 Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 of 29 May 1989 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax (OJ L 155, 7.6.1989, p.
Rådet foreslår derfor, at det ærede parlamentsmedlem retter denne forespørgsel til Kommissionen.
Consequently, the Council suggests that the Honourable Parliamentarian address this question to the Commission.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2312/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2312/08
Hvor stor en procentdel af Nederlandenes bidrag til EU-budgettet, og hvor stor en procentdel af det samlede EU-budget stammer fra moms på salg af hash og marihuana i de nederlandske coffee shops?
What percentage of the Netherlands' contribution to the EU budget and what percentage of the overall EU budget does the VAT charged on sales of hashish and marijuana in Dutch ‘coffee shops’ account for?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2313/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2313/08
Om: Bygge bro over informationskløften
Subject: Bridging the information gap
Adgangen til moderne informationsteknologi såsom bredbåndsinternet varierer meget mellem de 27 medlemsstater.
Access to modern information technology such as broadband Internet varies greatly across the 27 Member States.
Et stort antal europæiske borgere mangler den nødvendige viden og det nødvendige udstyr og har ikke mulighed for at benytte internettet.
Lacking the necessary knowledge and equipment, a large number of European citizens have no opportunity to use the Internet.
Nogle medlemsstater forsøger tydeligvis hårdt på at rette op på dette, og der står også EU-midler til rådighed med henblik herpå.
Some Member States are clearly trying hard to rectify this, and EU funds are available to do so.
Andre medlemsstater gør meget mindre for at bygge bro over informationskløften.
Other Member States are doing far less to bridge the information gap.
Ser Kommissionen på forskellene mellem den måde, hvorpå medlemsstaterne håndterer dette problem, og lægger den pres på dem for at fjerne informationskløften?
Is the Commission looking into the differences in the way Member States are handling this problem, and is it putting any pressure on them to put an end to the information gap?
Hvordan ser situationen ud i de enkelte medlemsstater siden den seneste rapport om spørgsmålet med hensyn til realisering af målene i 2010-strategien for et europæisk informationssamfund for vækst og beskæftigelse og fjernelse af informationskløften?
What is the situation in individual Member States since the last report on this matter in terms of achieving the goals set out in the i2010 strategy for a European Information Society for Growth and Employment and bringing an end to the information gap?
Hvilke medlemsstater benytter EU-midler til at fjerne informationskløften, og hvordan gør de det?
Which Member States are using EU funds to bring an end to the information gap, and how are they doing so?
Internettet bliver i stigende grad et redskab for offentliggørelse af information, og den mængde information, der formidles, er voksende; resultatet er, at det bliver stadig vanskeligere at finde, det man ønsker, til trods for de tilgængelige søgemuligheder.
The Internet is increasingly becoming a tool for publicising information, and the amount of information transmitted is increasing; the result is that — in spite of the available search facilities — it is becoming increasingly difficult to find exactly what you want.
Den øgende anvendelse af internetbaseret tv kan også skabe problemer, da netværkskapaciteten bliver opbrugt.
The increased use of Internet‑based television is also likely to cause problems as network capacity becomes used up.
Kan det aktuelle netværk i fremtiden blive uegnet til formidling af information?
Might the current network in future become unsuitable for the dissemination of information?
Overvejer Kommissionen spørgsmålet om, hvor længe internettet, som offentliggørelsen af information er baseret på, vil være egnet til at opfylde denne funktion?
Is the Commission considering the question of how long the Internet — on which the publicising of information is based — will be suitable for fulfilling this function?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2314/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2314/08
Om: José Barrosos udtalelser angående et nyt direktiv til bekæmpelse af forskelsbehandling
Subject: Statements by Mr Barroso concerning a new directive against discrimination
Hvis ja, hvordan stemmer dette overens med José Barrosos udtalelser i Europa-Parlamentet den 26. oktober 2004, hvori følgende passage indgår: »Jeg agter også på grundlag af EF-traktatens artikel 13 at iværksætte en indsats med henblik på et rammedirektiv, der skal erstatte de direktiver, som er vedtaget i 2000, og udvide dem til at omfatte alle former for forskelsbehandling (…) herunder forskelsbehandling på grund af køn eller seksuel orientering«?
If so, how can this be reconciled with the statement which Mr Barroso made on 26 October 2004 in the European Parliament, which included the following passage: ‘I also intend to initiate work with a view to a framework directive on the basis of Article 13 of the European Community Treaty, which will replace the directives adopted in 2000 and extend them to all forms of discrimination (…) including discrimination on the grounds of gender or sexual orientation’?
Hvis ikke, hvornår kan Europa-Parlamentet forvente et forslag til et nyt direktiv om forskelsbehandling?
If not, when can the European Parliament expect the proposal for a new directive on discrimination?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2320/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2320/08
Om: Situationen for LGBT-fællesskabet (lesbiske, bøsser, biseksuelle og transseksuelle) i Irak
Subject: Situation of the LGBT community in Iraq
Ifølge oplysninger fra irakisk LGBT, som er en forening for beskyttelse af LGBT i det krigshærgede land, fra Global Equality Network under Heartland Alliance og fra gruppen LGBT Rainbow Alliance fra universitetet i Pittsburg, er situationen for LGBT i Irak forværret siden den amerikanske invasion.
According to reports by the Iraqi LGBT, an organisation to protect LGBT in a country devastated by war, the Global Equality Network for Heartland Alliance and the group LGBT Rainbow Alliance of Pittsburgh University, the situation of LGBT in Iraq has worsened since the US invasion.
Selv om landet aldrig har været særlig tolerant over for homo-, bi- og transseksuelle, er volden mod disse personer tiltaget i slutningen af 2005.
Even though the country was never particularly tolerant towards homosexuals, bisexuals or transsexuals, violence against these groups has intensified since the end of 2005.
Den amerikanske besættelse har skabt sammenbrud af infrastrukturerne og undtagelsestilstand.
The occupation led to the collapse of infrastructure and a situation of emergency.
Det opståede kaos og kampen for kontrol over situationen har skabt en smeltedigel af religiøs fundamentalisme og undertrykkelse af kvinder og homoseksuelle.
The resulting chaos and struggles to contain it have created a breeding ground for religious fundamentalism and the oppression of women and homosexuals.
Dette har medført forfølgelse af LGBT, som ofte bliver udsat for tortur og myrdet af islamiske militser.
LGBT are now being persecuted by Islamic militias, and many have been tortured and murdered.
Er Rådet i lyset af sådanne situationer og det faktum, at flere af Den Europæiske Unions medlemsstater stadig fortsætter med at udsende tropper til Irak, bevidst om forringelsen af situationen for LGBT-fællesskabet i Irak efter krigen?
In the light of this situation and the fact that several European Union Member States are continuing to deploy troops in Iraq, is the Council aware of the worsening situation for the LGBT community in Iraq as a result of the war?
Hvad kan og agter Den Europæiske Union at gøre for at bidrage til opbygningen af en reel demokratisk stat i Irak ved at styrke civilsamfundet og især sikre LGBT-fællesskabets rettigheder og friheder?
What action can and will the EU take to help construct a genuine democratic state in Iraq based on strengthening civil society, in particular as regards guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of the LGBT population?