natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Under den seneste forhandlingsrunde opnåede Kommissionen, hvad kommissæren med ansvar for handel havde lovet i sin erklæring til Parlamentet, nemlig at den seneste udgave af forhandlingsoplægget offentliggøres.
During the latest round of negotiations the Commission has achieved what Commissioner in charge of Trade had promised in his statement to the Parliament, i.e. that the latest version of the negotiating text be made public.
Alle interesserede parter er nu fuldt ud orienteret om forhandlingernes aktuelle status og vil være i stand til at udtrykke deres betænkeligheder ud fra kendsgerninger og ikke ud fra rygter og løsrevne lækager.
All interested parties are now fully informed about the current status of the negotiations and will be able to express their concerns based on facts and not on rumours and out-of-context leaks.
Kommissionen ønsker endvidere at påpege, at den gennem Udvalget om International Handel (INTA) har forsynet Parlamentet med Rådets forhandlingsretningslinjer vedrørende ACTA, fuldstændige rapporter om forhandlingsrunderne og alle relevante dokumenter i almindelighed fra GD for Handel, som er blevet formidlet til medlemsstaterne gennem Handelspolitikudvalget.
Additionally, the Commission wishes to point out that it has provided the Parliament, through the International Trade (INTA) Committee, with the Council's negotiating guidelines on ACTA, full reports of negotiating rounds, and in general all relevant documents, originating from DG Trade, that have been shared with the Member States through the Trade Policy Committee.
Kommissionen har gjort dette i overensstemmelse med rammeaftalen og de bestemmelser, som er blevet indgået mellem Kommissionen og Parlamentet.
The Commission has done this in accordance with the framework agreement and with the rules agreed between Commission and Parliament.
Det betyder, at de mest følsomme dokumenter som f.eks. forhandlingsretningslinjerne er blevet gjort tilgængelige for INTA-Udvalgets formand og præsidium og for koordinatorerne af alle de politiske grupper i INTA-Udvalget, som aftalt.
This means that the most sensitive documents, such as the negotiating guidelines, have been made available to the Chairman and Bureau of the INTA Committee and with the Coordinators of all political groups in the INTA Committee — as agreed.
Kommissæren med ansvar for handel har også givet sine tjenestegrene besked på at give interesserede udvalg, politiske grupper og medlemmer af Parlamentet, som anmoder herom, særlige briefinger om alle aspekter af forhandlingerne.
Commissioner in charge of Trade has also instructed its services to provide dedicated briefings to interested Committees, political groups and Members of Parliament who so request on all aspects of the negotiations.
Nogle få af disse møder har allerede fundet sted og en debriefing om resultaterne af den næste forhandlingsrunde (12.‑16. april 2010) fandt sted i Bruxelles den 4. maj 2010.
A few of these meetings have already taken place, and a debriefing on the results of the next negotiating round (12‑16 April 2010) has taken place in Brussels on 4 May 2010.
Selv om ACTA-parterne for nylig har bekræftet deres vilje til at afslutte forhandlingerne i 2010, er det vanskeligt at forudsige, nøjagtig hvor lang tid der skal til for at indgå aftalen.
Although the ACTA parties have recently reaffirmed their willingness to conclude the negotiations in 2010, it is difficult to predict exactly how much time will be needed to conclude the Agreement.
Næste runde planlægges afholdt i Schweiz i ugen fra den 28. juni 2010.
The next round is foreseen to take place in Switzerland, during the week of 28 June 2010.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0727/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0727/10
Om: Kinas anke til WTO over europæiske handelspolitiske beskyttelsesforanstaltninger (fodtøj)
Subject: China's recourse to the WTO following European trade protection measures (footwear)
EU besluttede sidste december at forlænge antidumpingtolden på import af fodtøj fra Kina og Vietnam for en periode på 15 måneder.
Last December, after a thorough investigation by the Commission, the EU decided to extend the validity of anti-dumping taxes on imports of footwear from China and Vietnam for a 15‑month period.
Forud for dette havde Kommissionen foretaget en meget omfattende undersøgelse.
Naturally some voices were raised from within the EU opposing this extension.
Men eftersom man havde konstateret forsatte praksisser med dumping fra Kina og Vietnams side og det tab, som EU's producenter ville få, ville manglen på modforanstaltninger fra EU's side være ensbetydende med en accept af den ulovlige konkurrence, der er til skade for europæiske producenter.
However, given China’s and Vietnam’s confirmed perseverance in dumping practices, and given the damage to EU manufacturers, if the EU had not taken countermeasures this would have signified tolerance of unfair competition against European producers.
Kan den på baggrund af resultaterne af sin undersøgelse bekræfte, at den i forbindelse med konsultationerne med de kinesiske myndigheder vedvarende vil forsvare foreneligheden af omtalte handelspolitiske beskyttelsesforanstaltninger og ikke give efter for en mulig trussel om kinesiske modforanstaltninger?
Given the conclusions of its investigation, can the Commission confirm that, in consultations with the Chinese authorities, it will strongly defend the legitimacy of these trade protection measures and will not give way to any threat of Chinese countermeasures?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0728/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0728/10
Om: Flyvninger med Easyjet
Subject: Easyjet flights
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger, som har indgivet en klage til luftfartsselskabet Easyjet, fordi han mener, at de ikke har opfyldt erstatningskravene vedrørende forsinkede fly i henhold til EU's lovgivning.
I have been contacted by a constituent who has made a complaint to the airline company Easyjet because he believes that they have failed to meet the compensation requirements for delayed flights under EC law.
Han fastholder, at piloten, da hans fly var forsinket, afslørede, at dette skyldtes en fejl i planlægningen af piloternes arbejdstider, og at der derfor skulle tilkaldes en pilot.
He claims that when his flight was delayed, the pilot revealed that this was due to a mix-up in the scheduling of pilots and an ‘on-call’ pilot had to be used.
Det tog tre timer for piloten at komme til lufthavnen i Luton, hvilket forsinkede flyet til Istanbul med over tre timer.
The pilot took three hours to arrive at Luton Airport, which delayed the flight to Istanbul by over three hours.
Min vælger fastholder endvidere, at Easyjet har afsluttet klagen og ikke givet ham andre klagemuligheder, da de hævder, at forsinkelsen skyldtes tekniske omstændigheder.
My constituent also alleges that Easyjet has shut the complaint down and provided him with no further route of complaint because they have claimed that the delay was due to a technical issue.
Kan Kommissionen sige, om der kan findes foranstaltninger, som kan træffes over for luftfartsselskabet i denne sag?
Could the Commission advise if there is any action which can be taken against the airline on this issue?
Hvilke foranstaltninger kan min vælger træffe for at kræve erstatning i henhold til EU's lovgivning?
What action can my constituent take to claim the compensation due to him under EC law?
(24. marts 2010)
(24 March 2010)
I henhold til forordning (EF) nr. 261/2004 EUT L 46 af 17.2.2004. om luftfartspassagerers rettigheder påhviler det medlemsstaterne at oprette nationale håndhævelsesorganer, hvis hovedopgaver består i at behandle klager fra passagerer og sikre, at luftfartspassagerers rettigheder respekteres på behørig vis.
Under Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 OJ L 46, 17.2.2004. on air passenger rights Member States are required to set up national enforcement bodies (NEB) whose main tasks are to deal with complaints from passengers and to ensure that air passenger rights are properly respected.
Enhver passager, der er af den opfattelse, at vedkommendes rettigheder er blevet misligholdt, bør tage kontakt til et håndhævelsesorgan for at anmode om bistand i dette anliggende.
Any passenger who believes his/her rights were not respected should take contact with an enforcement body to assist him/her in this matter.
Men selv om nationale håndhævelsesorganer kan afgive en begrundet udtalelse om sager og i givet fald beslutte at pålægge luftfartsselskaber sanktioner, kan de ikke tildele godtgørelse til en passager i en individuel sag.
However, even if NEB can provide with a reasoned opinion on cases and eventually decide to apply a penalty to air carriers, they are not entitled to award damages to a passenger in an individual case.
Hvis en passager har lidt tab eller skade, kan vedkommende kun få tilkendt godtgørelse ved de nationale domstole.
Where passengers have suffered loss or damage, only the national courts can award damages.
Det kan derfor også være i passagerens interesse at søge juridisk rådgivning om muligheden for at benytte retsmidler på nationalt niveau.
Therefore, it may be in passenger interest also to take legal advice on the possibility to use the means of redress available at national level.
Domstolen fastslog i sin dom af 19. november 2009, Sturgeon mod Condor Flugdienst GmbH og Böck m.fl. mod Air France SA (forenede sager C‑402/07 og C‑432/07), at når passagerer ankommer til deres endelige bestemmelsessted tre timer eller mere efter det ankomsttidspunkt, som oprindeligt er planlagt, kan de påberåbe sig kompensationsretten.
In its ruling of 19 November 2009 Sturgeon v Condor Flugdienst GmbH and Böck and Others v Air France SA (Joined Cases C‑402/07 and 432/07) the European Court of Justice clarified that when they reach their final destination three hours or more after the scheduled arrival, passengers may seek flat-rate compensation from the airline.
En sådan forsinkelse giver ikke ret til en kompensation, hvis luftfartsselskabet kan godtgøre, at den lange forsinkelse skyldtes usædvanlige omstændigheder, som ligger uden for luftfartsselskabets faktiske kontrol, og som ikke kunne have været undgået, selv om alle forholdsregler, der med rimelighed kunne træffes, faktisk var blevet truffet.
Such a delay does not give rise to a right to compensation if the airline can prove that the delay was caused by extraordinary circumstances which are beyond its actual control and which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.
Domstolen mindede i den forbindelse om, at en teknisk fejl ved et luftfartøj ikke er omfattet af begrebet "usædvanlige omstændigheder", medmindre fejlen skyldes begivenheder, der på grund af fejlens karakter eller oprindelse ikke er et led i det berørte luftfartsselskabs sædvanlige aktivitetsudøvelse og ligger uden for luftfartsselskabets faktiske kontrol.
The Court recalled, on that point, that a technical problem in an aircraft cannot be regarded as an ‘extraordinary circumstance’, unless that problem stems from events which, by their nature or origin, are not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and are beyond its actual control.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0729/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0729/10
Om: Konkurrenceevne i lægemiddelsektoren
Subject: Competitiveness in the pharmaceutical industry
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger angående artikel 17 og Kommissionens undersøgelse om konkurrencebegrænsning i lægemiddelsektoren.
I have been contacted by a constituent about Article 17 and the EC anti-competition inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry.
Han citerer følgende udtalelse fra Neelie Kroes, da hun var kommissær for konkurrence:
He cites the following quote from Neelie Kroes when she was the European Commissioner for Competition:
»Vi har brug for mere konkurrence og mindre bureaukrati i lægemiddelsektoren.
‘We must have more competition and less red tape in pharmaceuticals.
Sektoren har alt for stor betydning for de europæiske borgeres helbred og de offentlige finanser til, at vi kan lade os nøje med noget, der er mindre end perfekt.
The sector is too important to the health and finances of Europe's citizens and governments to accept anything less than the best.
Sektorundersøgelsen har fortalt os, hvad der er galt med sektoren, og nu er det tid til at handle.
The inquiry has told us what is wrong with the sector, and now it is time to act.
Hver uges eller måneds forsinkelse i introduktionen af generiske lægemidler på markedet koster patienterne og skatteyderne penge.
When it comes to generic entry, every week and month of delay costs money to patients and taxpayers.
Vi vil ikke tøve med at anvende konkurrencereglerne, når sådanne forsinkelser beror på konkurrenceskadelig praksis.
We will not hesitate to apply the antitrust rules where such delays result from anticompetitive practices.
De første konkurrencesager er allerede på vej, og vi forestiller os, at der også bliver tale om lovgivningsændringer for at imødegå en række af problemerne i denne sektor.«
The first antitrust investigations are already under way, and regulatory adjustments are expected to follow dealing with a range of problems in the sector.’
Vil Kommissionen derfor svare på følgende: 1.
Therefore I ask: 1.
Hvilke praktiske foranstaltninger træffer Kommissionen for at mindske bureaukratiet? 2.
What practical steps is the EC taking to reduce red tape? 2.
Hvad er den aktuelle status for ovennævnte konkurrencesager? 3.
What is the current status of the abovementioned anti-trust investigations? 3.
I lyset af at EU fuldt ud anerkender lægemiddelsektorens strategiske og praktiske betydning – både økonomisk og i forhold til befolkningens sundhed – hvilke konkrete foranstaltninger træffer Kommissionen da for at vende udviklingen i Europas faldende konkurrenceevne på det globale lægemiddelmarked?
Given that the EU fully recognises the strategic and practical importance — both in terms of economics and population health — of the pharmaceutical industry, what concrete steps is the Commission taking to reverse the trend in Europe’s declining competitiveness in the global pharmaceutical market?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0730/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0730/10
Om: Skovrydning i Indonesien
Subject: Deforestation in Indonesia
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger vedrørende ødelæggelsen af regnskoven og habitater i Indonesien, som har store konsekvenser for orangutanger, tigre og andre dyr.
I have been contacted by a constituent regarding the destruction of the rainforest and habitat in Indonesia which is causing a great impact on the lives of orang utans, tigers and other animals.
Min vælger fastholder, at den indonesiske regering lovede at beskytte habitatet og miljøet på klimakonferencen på Bali i december 2007, og at EU har givet 20 mio. euro af skatteydernes penge til den indonesiske regering for at hjælpe med at holde dette løfte.
My constituent claims that the Indonesian Government gave commitments to protect the habitat and environment at the Bali Climate Change conference in December 2007 and that the EU has given EUR 20 million of taxpayers' money to the Indonesian Government to help meet this commitment.
Min vælger forstår dog, at den indonesiske regering fortsætter med at give flere tilladelser til skovhugst.
However, my constituent understands that the Indonesian Government continues to grant more logging licences.
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, hvilke foranstaltninger den har truffet for at rejse spørgsmålet om skovrydning for den indonesiske regering?
Can the Commission confirm what action it has taken to raise the issue of deforestation with the Indonesian Government?
Overvåger Kommissionen anvendelsen af de EU-midler, som gives til den indonesiske regering for at standse skovrydningen?
Is it monitoring the use of EU funds given to the Indonesian Government to stop deforestation?
Vil Kommissionen søge at kræve EU-midlerne tilbage fra den indonesiske regering, hvis skovrydningen fortsætter?
Will it seek to reclaim EU funds granted to the Indonesian Government if deforestation continues?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0731/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0731/10
Om: Industri i Letland
Subject: Industry in Latvia
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger, som arbejder i metalindustrien.
I have been contacted by a constituent who works in the metal industry.
Han hævder, at hans virksomhed i juli 2009 indgik en aftale med en virksomhed i Riga (Larimets Ltd) om at levere et læs siliciummetal til en værdi af 37 000 euro til dem.
He claims that in July 2009 his company concluded business with a company in Riga (Larimets Ltd) to supply them with a load of silicon metal with a value of EUR 37 000 .
Han har endnu ikke modtaget betaling for denne leverance, selv om betalingsfristen i henhold til aftalen var den 15. august 2009.
He has not yet received payment for this shipment, even though the contract said that the deadline for payment was 15 August 2009.
Min vælger forstår, at den lettiske regering har alvorlige økonomiske problemer, og at den ikke kan tilbagebetale skyldig moms til virksomheder i Letland.
My constituent understands that the Latvian Government is in serious financial difficulty and that it is unable to repay companies in Latvia VAT rebates that are owing.
Derfor har mange lettiske virksomheder alvorlige likviditetsproblemer.
As a result many companies in Latvia are experiencing severe cash flow hardship.
Larimets Ltd har tilsyneladende indstillet driften, og betaler ikke sine medarbejdere, men er endnu ikke gået konkurs.
Apparently, Larimets Ltd has stopped operating and is not paying its employees but has not yet gone into liquidation.
Min vælger har af direktøren og aktionærerne i virksomheden fået at vide, at denne situation volder store problemer for den lettiske industri og handel.
My constituent has been told by the director and shareholders of the company that this situation is causing severe hardship to Latvian industry and commerce.
Er Kommissionen opmærksom på situationen og dens konsekvenser for lettiske virksomheder og deres samhandelspartnere? 2.
Is the Commission aware of this situation and its impact on Latvian companies and their trading partners? 2.
Hvilke foranstaltninger mener Kommissionen, at der kan træffes for at hjælpe den lettiske regering og dermed den lettiske industri og følgelig EU's industri, som handler med Letland?
What action does the Commission believe could be taken to assist the Latvian Government, thereby Latvian industry, and as a result industry in the EU which trades with Latvia?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0732/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0732/10
Om: Tilpasning af arbejdspladser til handicappede arbejdstagere
Subject: Workplace adjustments for disabled workers
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger, som er direktør for et selskab ved navn »Workplace Disability Adjustments«, og som gerne vil informeres om aktivitetsniveauet i Europa med hensyn til finansiering og lovgivning, som gør det muligt at foretage vigtige tilpasninger af arbejdspladser.
I have been contacted by a constituent who is the director of a company called ‘Workplace Disability Adjustments’ and who would like to be informed about the level of activity in Europe with regards to funding and legislation that enables vital adjustments to workplaces to be made.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse dette, samt hvor meget støtte EU tilbyder?
Could you please inform me of this information and how much support the EU offers?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0733/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0733/10
Om: Verdensmesterskabet i svømning 2009 i Polo Natatorio di Ostia (Rom)
Subject: 2009 World Swimming Championships — Ostia Swimming Centre (Rome)
Den 16 juli 2005 besluttede Det Internationale Svømmeforbund at tildele Italien afholdelsen af den 13. udgave af verdensmesterskabet i svømning.
On 16 July 2005 the International Swimming Federation assigned the task of organising the 13th World Swimming Championships to Italy.
Polo di Ostia er et anlæg, der sammen med Pietralata og Valco San Paolo udgør et af de tre offentlige anlæg, som blev opført til verdensmesterskabet i 2009.
The Ostia centre, together with Pietralata and Valco San Paolo, was one of the three public installations built for the 2009 championships.
I betragtning af: —
In view of the fact that: —
aftalen om statslige indkøb (GPA), som blev drøftet inden for rammerne af Verdenshandelsorganisationens (WTO), og —
the Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) was negotiated under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation(WTO); —
at man indtil dato (3. februar 2010) kun har udsendt den vejledende forhåndsmeddelelse ( prior information notice ) 2008/S 22-028579 EUT S 22 af 1.2.2008. og udbudsbekendtgørelsen ( contract notice )
to date, 3 February 2010, only prior information notice 2008/S 22-028579 OJ S 22, 1.2.2008 . and contract notice 2008/S 69-092980 OJ S 69, 9.4.2008 . have been published, but the contract award notice has not; —
at de af den befuldmægtigede inspektør fremviste beregninger derimod når op på det dobbelte (ca. 26 mio. i april 2009) uden dokumentation for udgifterne, og at der er udsigt til, at beløbet vil stige, eftersom arbejderne endnu ikke er afsluttet,
the accounts submitted by the special commissioner amounted to nearly double that figure (some EUR 26 million as at April 2009), with no justification of expenditure, and are likely to increase because the work is not yet finished,
bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
can the Commission say: 1.
Hvorfor er udfaldet af licitationen efter ca. to år fra indgåelsen af kontrakten endnu ikke blevet offentliggjort i EU-tidende, serie »S«? 2.
why, two years from the drawing up of the contract, the result of the call for tender has not been published in the ‘S’ series of the Official Journal of the European Union ; 2.
Er EU-lovgivningen blevet overtrådt? 3.
whether EU legislation has been breached, and 3.
Kan den manglende offentliggørelse sætte spørgsmålstegn ved tildelingen af kontrakten?
whether the failure to publish the result might call into question the award of the contract?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0734/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0734/10
Om: Strafferetlig undersøgelse af kurdisk parti i Tyrkiet
Subject: Criminal investigation against Kurdish party in Turkey
Lederen af den offentlige anklagemyndighed i Ankara har indledt en undersøgelse af det kurdiske parti for fred og demokrati (BDP).
The chief public prosecutor in Ankara has begun a criminal investigation against the Kurdish Freedom and Democracy Party (BDP).
I anledning af dette partis første ekstraordinære kongres den 31. januar er der indgivet anmeldelser om »ophidselse af folk imod hæren«, »overtrædelser af loven om politiske partier« og »forherligelse af forbrydelser og forbrydere«.
In response to the party's first extraordinary congress on 31 January, complaints have been made such as ‘the inciting of people against the army’, ‘contraventions of the law on political parties’ and ‘glorification of crimes and criminals’.
En af anmeldelserne skyldes muligvis, at den tyrkiske nationalsang ikke blev spillet ved indledningen af kongressen.
One of the complaints perhaps has to do with the fact that the Turkish national anthem was not played at the start of the congress.
Hvilke skridt har Kommissionen foretaget i forbindelse med denne udvikling?
What steps has the Commission taken in connection with these developments?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0735/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0735/10
Om: Tvangsægteskaber i Tyrkiet
Subject: Forced marriages in Turkey
I slutningen af januar begik en tvilling i det sydøstlige Tyrkiet selvmord, efter at hendes familie havde bortgiftet en af de to kvinder til en nevø imod hendes vilje.
At the end of January a twin committed suicide in south‑eastern Turkey after one of two women was married against her will by her family to a cousin.
Tvangsægteskaber er et ofte forekommende fænomen i arkaiske og muslimske samfund generelt, og specielt i det sydøstlige Tyrkiet.
Forced marriages are a frequent phenomenon in archaic and Islamic communities in general and in south‑eastern Turkey in particular.
Råder Kommissionen over pålideligt talmateriale til at kunne bedømme omfanget af problemet i Tyrkiet korrekt?
Does the Commission have reliable statistics for correctly judging the scale of the problem in Turkey?
Har Kommissionen selv ladet data indsamle herom?
Has the Commission itself had figures collected on this?