natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Har Kommissionen sammen med forvaltningsmyndigheden med regelmæssige mellemrum holdt møder om overvågning af interventionen i henhold til betragtning 47 i forordning (EF) nr. 1260/1999 EFT L 161 af 26.6.1999, s. 1 . om strukturfondene?
Has the Commission held regular meetings with the managing authority responsible for monitoring the works, as laid down in Article 47 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p.
Kan Kommissionen ikke, for så vidt angår betragtning 44 i forordningen, konkludere, at forsinkelserne i den finansielle gennemførelse medfører, at forskuddet skal tilbagebetales, og at partnerne uden videre frigøres fra deres forpligtelser?
Is the Commission not of the opinion that, under Article 44 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, the delays in financial implementation should give rise to the repayment of advances and to automatic decommitments?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2252/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2252/08
Om: France Télécoms diskriminering af udenlandske markedsdeltagere
Subject: Discrimination by France Télécom against foreign operators
Kontraktparterne Belgien, Nederlandene, Luxembourg, Sverige og Danmark overdrog selskabet AGES at indføre den såkaldte e-vignet som vejafgiftssystem for lastbiler i disse stater fra den 1. oktober 2008.
The company AGES has been commissioned by the contracting states Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Sweden and Denmark to introduce the ‘e‑Vignette’ toll for heavy goods vehicles in those countries on 1 October 2008.
Der etableres et tilstrækkeligt antal e-vignetsalgssteder i nabolandene, for at e-vignetkøbene direkte ved kontraktparternes grænser ikke kommer til at genere trafikken.
In order not to hinder the flow of traffic at the borders of the contracting states when e-Vignettes are being purchased, sufficient numbers of e‑Vignette sales points are being set up in neighbouring countries.
Der skal efter anmodning fra Belgien og Luxembourg etableres 100 salgssteder i Frankrig.
In France some 100 sales points are to be set up at the request of Belgium and Luxembourg.
For at kunne gennemføre salget af e-vignetter ved disse salgssteder er det nødvendigt at have en betjeningsenhed, der via ISDN forbinder datacentret med selskabet AGES.
Terminals linked to the AGES computer centre by an ISDN connection need to be set up at these sales points to allow e‑Vignettes to be purchased.
I Frankrig forlanger France Télécom dog en registrering i handelsregisteret, hvis de skal stille ISDN-forbindelser til rådighed.
In France, however, France Télécom requires an entry in the register of companies before providing an ISDN connection.
Idet AGES er registreret i Tyskland og således ikke kan godtgøre at være registreret i det ønskede selskabsregister, kan France Télécom ikke levere ISDN-forbindelser til det tyske selskab.
As AGES is registered in Germany, the company cannot provide the required entry in the register of companies and is therefore unable to obtain an ISDN connection from France Télécom.
Har Kommissionen kendskab til France Télécoms fremgangsmåde på dette område, og mener Kommissionen, at disse forretningsmetoder er diskriminerende over for udenlandske virksomheder og således ikke i overensstemmelse med fællesskabsretten?
Is the Commission aware of this practice by France Télécom, and does the Commission take the view that such business practices constitute discrimination against foreign companies and are therefore incompatible with Community law?
Hvis ja, hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe for at imødegå France Télécoms overtrædelse af fællesskabsretten?
If so, what measures does the Commission intend to take to put a stop to this infringement of Community law by France Télécom?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2253/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2253/08
Om: »Certificats de vie« og pensionsmobilitet
Subject: ‘Certificats de vie’ and pension mobility
Er det rigtigt, at en person, som har arbejdet i flere medlemsstater, er nødt til at bevise, at han eller hun stadig er i live ved at udfylde en formular (»certificat de vie«) inden en bestemt dato og bringe denne til det lokale socialsikringskontor for at modtage en fuld pension, som tager alle relevante perioder i betragtning?
Is it correct that someone who has worked in several Member States would have to prove the fact that he or she is still alive by filling in a form (‘certificat de vie’) by a certain date, and taking it to a local social security office in order to receive a full pension that takes all relevant periods into account?
Hvis det er rigtigt, mener Kommissionen da ikke, at det er dyrt, et unødvendigt spild af offentlige ressourcer og en potentiel hindring for den fri bevægelighed ikke at harmonisere datoen for indgivelse af disse dokumenter til socialsikringskontoret i den medlemsstat, hvori vedkommende er bosiddende, således at alle »certificats de vie« kan behandles samlet?
If this is so, does the Commission consider that it is costly, unnecessarily wasteful of public resources and a potential hindrance to free movement not to harmonise the date on which these documents must be handed to the social security office in the Member State of residence, so that all ‘certificats de vie’ can be handed in together?
Agter Kommissionen at træffe nogen foranstaltninger i denne henseende?
Does the Commission envisage any action in this respect?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2254/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2254/08
Om: Diskriminatoriske bestemmelser om nationalitet i det belgiske svømmeforbund
Subject: Discriminatory nationality-based rules of the Belgian Swimming Federation
Den 1. marts 2008 vedtog det kongelige belgiske svømmeforbund et nyt reglement, hvorefter alle svømmere, både børn og voksne, der bor og træner i Belgien og er tilmeldt en belgisk klub, men som ikke er belgiske statsborgere, ikke kan deltage i mesterskaber.
The Royal Belgian Swimming Federation (Fédération Royale Belge de Natation) adopted new rules, with effect from 1 March 2008, excluding from championships all swimmers, both children and adults, who live and train in Belgium and have competition licences with Belgian clubs but are not Belgian nationals.
(Ændringer af reglementet i det kongelige belgiske svømmeforbund: ASR 02.1, SRZW 03.7, BKZWJ 09.5, SRMA 04.7 og BKZWJ 09.1).
(The Federation's changes of rules are: ASR 02.1, SRZW 03.7, BKZWJ 09.5, SRMA 04.7 and BKZWJ 09.1).
har siden det belgiske juniormesterskab, der fandt sted den 27.-29. juli 2007, ikke haft ret til mesterskabstitlen 2.
since the Belgian Youth Championships from 27 to 29 July 2007, have no longer had any right to championship titles; 2.
har siden det belgiske juniormesterskab i juli 2007 ikke modtaget medaljer på podiet 3.
since the Belgian Youth Championships in July 2007, have no longer received medals for a place on the winners' dais; 3.
har siden 2008 ikke fået deres bedste tider anerkendt som national (belgisk) rekord.
as from 2008, can no longer be recognised as Belgian record-holders if they break Belgian swimming records.
Denne bestemmelse rammer mange unge, der bor og træner i Belgien og deltager i (nationale, føderale, regionale) konkurrencer for deres belgiske klubber.
These rules affect many children, many of whom have lived and trained here for years and who compete in national, federal or regional competitions for their Belgian clubs.
Ifølge EU-traktaten er forskelsbehandling på grundlag af nationalitet forbudt, og ikkeforskelsbehandling er et generelt princip.
The Treaty on European Union prohibits discrimination on grounds of nationality and upholds non-discrimination as a general principle.
De EU-borgere, der bor i en anden medlemsstat, har ret til ligebehandling (se også EU-traktatens artikel 12).
EU citizens who live in a different EU Member State have a right to equal treatment (see Article 12 of the Treaty on European Union).
I henhold til den nye EU-traktat har EU kompetence til at træffe foranstaltninger inden for sport i grænseoverskridende tilfælde.
In the new EU Treaty, the EU is empowered to take measures in the field of sport relating to cross-border matters.
Ifølge artikel 149 bidrager EU til »at udvikle sportens europæiske dimension ved at fremme retfærdighed og åbenhed i sportskonkurrencer og samarbejde mellem de organisationer og myndigheder, der har ansvar for sport, samt ved at beskytte sportsudøvernes og især de unge sportsudøveres fysiske og moralske integritet.«
Article 149 includes the following clause: ‘developing the European dimension in sport, by promoting fairness and openness in sporting competitions and cooperation between bodies responsible for sports, and by protecting the physical and moral integrity of sportsmen and sportswomen, especially the youngest sportsmen and sportswomen.’
Er Kommissionen enig i, at det belgiske svømmeforbund i sit generelle reglement om sporten og de efterfølgende reglementer udøver forskelsbehandling på grundlag af nationalitet?
Does the Commission agree that the Belgian Swimming Federation discriminates on grounds of nationality in the General Sports Regulations and subsequent rules?
Mener Kommissionen, at denne forskelsbehandling er begrundet?
Does the Commission consider this discrimination justified?
Mener Kommissionen, at denne forskelsbehandling er begrundet for unge under 18 år?
Does the Commission consider this discrimination justified for children aged under 18?
I benægtende fald, hvad kan Kommissionen da gøre for at sætte en stopper for denne forskelsbehandling?
If not, what can the Commission do to eliminate this discrimination?
Mener Kommissionen, at Lissabontraktaten udgør det retsgrundlag, der kan sætte en stopper for denne forskelsbehandling?
Does the Lisbon Treaty constitute the legal basis for eliminating this discrimination?
I bekræftende fald, kan Kommissionen da gribe ind hurtigst muligt og inden det belgiske mesterskab, der finder sted den 1.-4. og 10.-12. maj 2008?
If so, can the Commission take action soon, i.e. before the Belgian Championships of 1-4 and 10-12 May 2008?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2255/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2255/08
Om: Forslag om tilpasning af lovgivningen om den europæiske arrestordre
Subject: Proposals for amending the rules governing the European Arrest Warrant
I forespørgsel E-6516/07 til Rådet spurgte jeg:
In my Question E‑6516/07 to the Council, I asked:
»Er Rådet enigt i, at det i betragtning af princippet om gensidig tillid skal beklages, at medlemsstat A, der har udstedt en europæisk arrestordre mod en statsborger i medlemsstat B, ganske enkelt kan ignorere en begrundet domstolsdom fra medlemsstat B, mens medlemsstat B i denne dom præciserer, at der er tale om en åbenlys fejl, og at dennes statsborger med urette er havnet i sagen?
‘Does the Council agree that it is regrettable, in the light of the principle of mutual trust, that Member State A, which has issued an EAW for the arrest of a national of Member State B, can simply disregard a reasoned court judgment from Member State B in which the latter makes clear that there has been a manifest error (erreur manifeste) and that its “own” national has become involved in the case mistakenly?
Hvis nej, kan Rådet da forklare hvorfor ikke?«
If not, why not?’
I sit svar på samme forespørgsel ( E-6517/07 ) oplyser Kommissionen, at den i 2008 vil udgive en fjerde evalueringsrapport om den europæiske arrestordre og tage højde for de forskellige medlemsstaters evalueringsrapporter.
In its reply to the same question (E‑6517/07), the Commission indicates that in 2008 it intends to publish a fourth evaluation report on the EAW, taking into account the evaluation reports of the individual Member States.
Desuden fastslår den, at hvis det viser sig, at den europæiske arrestordre er baseret på en åbenlys fejl, skal den person, som den europæiske arrestordre er udstedt mod i medfør af nationalretlige bestemmelser, være berettiget til at gøre indsigelse mod denne beslutning og i givet fald få annulleret den europæiske arrestordre hurtigst muligt af den medlemsstat, der har udstedt den.
It also indicates that, if it appears that a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is based on a mistake (‘erreur manifeste’), the subject of the EAW should have the right under domestic law to challenge the decision, and, if appropriate, to have the EAW withdrawn as soon as possible by the issuing Member State.
Er Kommissionen villig til at stille Rådet konkrete forslag om at »fastlåse« lovgivningen om den europæiske arrestordre, så der gives mulighed for at gøre indsigelse mod en europæisk arrestordre, der er udstedt med urette, nemlig på grund af en åbenlys fejl?
Will the Commission make specific proposals to the Council for completing the rules on the EAW in order to create a practical opportunity to contest an EAW which has been issued wrongly on the basis of a manifest error?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2256/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2256/08
Om: Turistboykot mod Thailand
Subject: Tourist boycotting of Thailand
Vil Kommissionen arbejde for en turistboykot mod Thailand, indtil landet tillader medlemmer af den burmesiske etniske gruppe Kayan, som det udnytter af kommercielle grunde, at udvandre til New Zealand, Finland eller andre lande?
Will the Commission work for a tourist boycott of Thailand until it allows members of the Burmese Kayan ethnic group, which it is exploiting for commercial reasons, to emigrate to New Zealand, Finland and other countries?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2257/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2257/08
Om: Halal- og kosherkød
Subject: Halal and kosher meat
Vil Kommissionen sikre, at alt halal- og kosherkød bliver klart og tydeligt mærket, så dem, der finder sådanne slagtemetoder grusomme, kan undgå at købe den slags kød?
Will the Commission ensure that all halal and kosher meat is clearly and prominently labelled, so that those who believe these methods of killing animals to be cruel can avoid the meat?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2258/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2258/08
Om: Slaveri i Thailand
Subject: Slavery in Thailand
Vil Kommissionen forhøre sig hos FN's Flygtningehøjkommissariat (UNHCR) om, hvorfor det tillader, at medlemmer af den burmesiske etniske gruppe Kayan bliver tilbageholdt som faktiske slaver i Thailand?
Will the Commission enquire of UNHCR why it is allowing members of the Burmese Kayan ethnic group to be detained as virtual slaves in Thailand?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2259/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2259/08
Om: Fængsling af den burmesiske etniske gruppe Kayan
Subject: Imprisonment of the Burmese ethnic group the Kayan
Hvilke indvendinger har Kommissionen fremsat over for den thailandske regering vedrørende dens tilbageholdelse af den burmesiske etniske gruppe Kayan i Thailand?
What representations has the Commission made to the Government of Thailand about its detention in Thailand of the Burmese ethnic group the Kayan?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2260/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2260/08
Om: Sanktioner mod Thailand
Subject: Sanctions against Thailand
Vil Kommissionen advare regeringen i Thailand om, at medmindre den holder op med at behandle medlemmer af den etniske gruppe Kayan som slaver i sin turistindustri og tilstår dem fulde menneskerettigheder, inklusive frihed til at forlade landet, vil Kommissionen påføre Thailand økonomiske sanktioner?
Will the Commission warn the Government of Thailand that unless it stops treating members of the Kayan ethnic group as slaves to support its tourist industry and accords them full human rights, including the freedom to leave the country, it will impose economic sanctions on Thailand?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2261/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2261/08
Om: Handicappedes adgang til offentlig transport i EU
Subject: Disabled access to public transport in the EU
Er Kommissionen tilfreds med adgangsmulighederne for handicappede til offentlig transport i EU, og, hvis ikke, hvilke skridt tager den så for at forbedre situationen?
Is the Commission satisfied with access for the disabled to public transport in the EU and, if not, what steps is it taking to improve the situation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2262/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2262/08
Om: EU-støtte til medlemmer af Fatah
Subject: European remuneration for Fatah members
Ifølge en rapport fra Funding For Peace Coalition fra august 2004 havde Den Palæstinensiske Myndighed i august 2004 omkring 124 000 ansatte, hvis lønninger udgjorde cirka 70 % af Den Palæstinensiske Myndigheds årlige budget (Funding for Peace Coalition, Managing European taxpayers' money, august 2004, s. 16), hvis midler i meget stort omfang kommer fra EU.
According to a Funding For Peace Coalition report of August 2004, the Palestinian Authority (PA) employed some 124 000 people in 2004, whose salaries accounted for about 70 % of the PA’s annual budget (Funding for Peace Coalition, Managing European taxpayers’ money, August 2004, p.
Amar Taha og Ali Dandanes, to medlemmer af den palæstinensiske gruppe Fatah, har dræbt israelerne Ahikan Amihai og David Rubi i nærheden af Hebron.
Amar Taha and Ali Dandanes, two members of the Palestinian Fatah group, shot dead the Israelis Ahikan Amihai and David Rubin in the neighbourhood of Hebron.
I december 2007 dræbte brødrene Dafer og Abdullah Birham, der er medlemmer af Den Palæstinensiske Myndigheds sikkerhedstjeneste, den israelske statsborger Ido Zoldan.
In December 2007 the brothers Dafer and Abdullah Birham, two members of the PA’s security service, killed the Israeli national Ido Zoldan.
I løbet af undersøgelsen bekræftede de, at Fadi Jama, der også arbejdede i sikkerhedstjenesten, var indblandet i dette mord (brev fra Funding For Peace Coalition til udvalget for international udviklingshjælp i det britiske parlament (House of Commons) (12. marts 2008)).
At the ensuing inquiry they stated that Fadi Jama, another security service employee, was also involved in the killing (letter from the Funding For Peace Coalition to the UK House of Commons International Development Committee,12 March 2008).
Har Amar Taha, Ali Dandanes, Dafer og Abdullah Birham samt Fadi Jama tidligere modtaget lønninger, der var finansieret af EU?
Have Amar Taha, Ali Dandanes, Dafer and Abdullah Birham and Fadi Jama been paid EU‑funded salaries in the past?
Modtager de stadig i dag lønninger, der er finansieret af EU?
Are they still being paid EU‑funded salaries now?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2263/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2263/08
Om: EU-støtte til Holy Land Trust
Subject: European support for the Holy Land Trust
I 2005 modtog ngo'en Holy Land Trust 156 543 euro i EU-midler fra Euro-Middelhavspartnerskabet for fred, og i december 2007 modtog den 99 657 euro gennem Det Europæiske Instrument for Demokrati og Menneskerettigheder.
In 2005 the NGO Holy Land Trust received EUR 156543 in European funding under the Euro‑Mediterranean Partnership for Peace, and in December 2007 it received EUR 99657 via the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights.
Hvilke kriterier og målsætninger har Kommissionen taget udgangspunkt i ved tildelingen af denne støtte?
On the basis of which criteria and objectives did the Commission grant this aid?
Hvordan måler og evaluerer Kommissionen denne organisations aktiviteter?
How does the Commission measure and evaluate the activities of this organisation?
Skal opfordringen til at støtte akademisk boykot af Israel fordømmes i henhold til EU's officielle målsætninger for regionen, der navnlig sigter efter at fremme fred og samarbejde og modarbejde polarisering?
Should the call to support an academic boycott of Israel not be condemned in accordance with the EU’s official objectives in the region, which are among other things to promote peace and cooperation and to combat polarisation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2264/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2264/08
Om: EU-støtte til Mossawa
Subject: European aid for Mossawa
I 2003 modtog den palæstinensiske ngo Mossawa 650 000 euro i EU-midler og i 2005 yderligere 298 660 euro, begge gange gennem Det Europæiske Instrument for Demokrati og Menneskerettigheder.
The Palestinian NGO Mossawa received EUR 650 000 in European funding in 2003 and another EUR 298 660 in 2005, each time via the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights.
Denne ngo beskylder til stadighed Israel for racisme og har ført en meget aktiv kampagne mod loven om statsborgerskab.
This NGO regularly accuses Israel of racism and has pursued a very active campaign against the citizenship law.
I ugen 25. november-1. december 2006 havde Mossawa organiseret en konference, der navnlig gav lejlighed til at præsentere dokumentet »Fremtiden for de palæstinensiske arabere i Israel«.
In the week from 25 November to 1 December 2006 Mossawa organised a conference at which, inter alia , the document entitled ‘The future vision of the Palestinian Arabs in Israel’ was presented.
Hvilke kriterier og målsætninger har Kommissionen taget udgangspunkt i ved tildelingen af støtte til Mossawa?
On the basis of what criteria and objectives did the Commission grant aid to Mossawa?
Hvordan måler og evaluerer Kommissionen denne organisations aktiviteter?
How does the Commission measure and evaluate the organisation’s activities?
Er Mossawas forslag og målsætninger ikke i direkte modstrid med EU's officielle målsætninger for regionen?
Are Mossawa’s proposals and objectives not diametrically opposed to the EU’s official objectives in the region?
Hvordan retfærdiggør Kommissionen, at der tildeles støtte til en organisation, som udbreder og udtrykkeligt aggressive politiske idéer og polariserer yderligere?
How does the Commission justify the granting of subsidies to an organisation that propagates very explicit aggressive political ideas and contributes to the process of polarisation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2265/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2265/08
Om: Fonde til finansiering af netværk
Subject: Money for funding networks
Der findes stadig store uligheder mellem de forskellige stater i EU (og mellem staternes regioner), for så vidt angår eksistensen og kvaliteten af netværk, der forbinder kulturelle institutioner, skoler, universiteter og forskellige videns- og kulturfora.
There is still a major disparity between different EU Member States (and between regions within the same) with regard to the availability and quality of the networks linking cultural institutions, schools, universities and different scientific and cultural centres.
For fjernt beliggende regioner, som ikke er forbundet indbyrdes og har en beskeden befolkning, betyder dette en kæmpeudgift.
For remoter, non-interconnected and thinly-populated regions, this involves tremendous costs.
F.eks. har Portugal, som ligger i et fjernt hjørne af EU, vanskeligheder med at opbygge et velfungerende netværk af denne type og har anmodet om anvendelse af strukturfondene til det.
For example, Portugal, which, located in a remote corner of the EU, has difficulties in building a proper network of this kind, has requested to use the Structural Funds to this end.
Slovenien har et meget lavt befolkningstal, og udgiften pr. skatteborger er derfor større end i de fleste andre medlemsstater.
We could also cite thinly-populated Slovenia, where the per capita cost to the taxpayer is greater than in most Member States.
Generaldirektoratet for Regionalpolitik giver ved hjælp af sine strukturfonde mulighed for delvis finansiering af disse e-infrastrukturer, men i virkeligheden findes der meget få uddannelsesinstitutioner i landdistrikterne.
The DG REGIO, by means of its Structural Funds, makes possible the part-funding of these e-infrastructures, but the truth of the matter is that in the countryside there are very few educational institutions.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at det ville være interessant at oprette nogle fonde direkte til finansiering af denne form for projekter med henblik på at fremme disse netværk og dermed gøre fremskridt med hensyn til at opnå en virkelig »fri bevægelighed for viden« i EU?
Does the Commission not think that it would be useful to set up some funds directly designed to fund projects of this kind in order to promote these networks, and thus make progress to achieving genuine ‘freedom of knowledge’ within the EU?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2268/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2268/08
Om: Fri handel med guld inden for EU
Subject: Free trade in gold in the EU