natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En vælger oplyser mig om, at British Airways (BA) og British Midland Airways (BMI) sælger returrejser til Jeddah til priser fra 300 GBP pr. voksen, og at disse pladser kan bestilles over internettet og gennem IATA-rejsebureauer.
A constituent informs me that British Airways (BA) and British Midland Airways (BMI) are selling return flights to Jeddah at prices starting at GBP 300 per adult and that these seats are bookable on the Internet and through IATA travel agents.
Min vælger oplyser imidlertid, at disse flyselskaber har offentliggjort en meddelelse, der informerer forbrugerne om, at de, hvis de planlægger at rejse på et umrah- eller hajjpilgrimsvisum, på grund af visumrestriktioner skal bestille gennem vores udpegede repræsentant.
However, my constituent tells me that these airlines have posted a notice advising consumers that, if they are planning to travel on an Umrah or Hajj visa, ‘due to visa restrictions, you must book through our appointed agent …’.
Min vælger mener, at dette er forkert, da alle visa udstedt til Saudi-Arabien har restriktioner, uanset om de er til turist- eller forretningsrejser mv., og nogle af disse visa er endog underlagt flere restriktioner end umrah- og hajjvisa.
My constituent feels that this is incorrect, as all visas to Saudi Arabia have restrictions, whether they are for tourism or business visits, etc., and on some of those visas there are even more restrictions than on Umrah/Hajj visas.
Min vælger mener, at umrah- og hajjrejsende, dvs. praktiserende muslimer, når de køber samme produkt som andre, bliver udsat for forskelsbehandling på følgende måde: 1.
My constituent feels that, for the same product that others purchase, Umrah and Hajj travellers, i.e. practising Muslims, are being discriminated against in the following ways: 1.
Den udpegede repræsentant sælger den samme rejse under ramadanen til priser fra 650 GBP pr. person og i løbet af hajjperioden til priser fra 779 GBP og helt op til 928 GBP pr. passager, mens de, der rejser til Saudi-Arabien uden at have pilgrimsrejse som formål, betaler helt ned til 300 GBP pr. person for at rejse i den samme periode med tilsvarende pladser og tjenesteydelser.
The appointed agent will sell the same flight during Ramadan at prices starting at GBP 650 per person and during the Hajj period at prices starting at GBP 779, rising to as much as GBP 928 per passenger, whilst those that travel to Saudi Arabia, but not to perform pilgrimage, pay as little as GBP 300 per person to travel during the same period, with similar seats and service.
Der er begrænsede måder, hvorpå hajjrejsende har mulighed for at købe flybilletter.
Hajj travellers are restricted in the number of ways in which they can purchase air tickets.
Selv om muslimske pilgrimme betaler mere end tre gange den normale pris, der reklameres med, er deres billetter ofte underlagt flere restriktioner med hensyn til annullering og ændringer.
Although Muslim pilgrims pay over three times the normal advertised price, their tickets are often subject to more restrictions in terms of cancellations and changes.
Vil Kommissionen behandle disse udtalelser?
Could the Commission address these statements?
Er BA's og BMI's politikker vedrørende hajjflyrejser diskriminerende over for muslimske rejsende?
Are BA's and BMI's Hajj flight policies discriminatory towards Muslim travellers?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0779/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0779/09
Om: Konfiskation af toldfrie varer
Subject: Confiscation of duty-free goods
En af mine vælgere fik for nylig konfiskeret toldfrie varer i en lufthavn i EU på sin gennemrejse til London.
Recently, one of my constituents had some duty-free goods confiscated at an EU airport whilst in transit to London.
Den pågældende vare var købt i en toldfri butik uden for EU.
The item in question was bought in a duty-free shop outside the EU.
Han er siden da blevet bekendt med den relevante EU-lovgivning, der dækker dette.
Since this incident, he has come to learn of the relevant EU regulation which covers this.
Min vælger mener, at der findes en ny forordning, som i praksis ophæver en ældre forordning og giver mulighed for, at væsker købt toldfrit uden for EU medbringes som håndbagage, når man skifter fly inden for EU, men han har konstateret, at kun to lande har gennemgået den kontrol, der giver mulighed for nu at medbringe toldfrie væsker på flyforbindelser fra EU, nemlig Singapore og Kroatien.
My constituent believes that there is a new regulation which effectively rescinds an older one and allows duty-free liquids bought outside the EU to be carried onto a connecting flight within the EU as hand luggage, but he has found that only two countries have passed the vetting process which allows for duty-free liquids to now be carried on connecting flights from the EU: Singapore and Croatia.
Min vælger vil gerne vide, hvem der er ansvarlig for ikke at have advaret ham om, at denne situation kunne opstå.
My constituent would like to know who is responsible for not warning him that this situation could arise.
Er det rejsebureauets, flyselskabets eller den toldfri butiks ansvar?
Is this the responsibility of the booking agent, the airline or the duty-free shop?
Min vælger mener, at det ville være uretfærdigt at placere dette ansvar hos passageren.
My constituent feels that it would be unfair to place this responsibility on the passenger.
Min vælger mener også, at det er forkert, at man helt frit kan tage toldfrie varer med ind i EU fra lande uden for EU, men at den samme toldfri vare konfiskeres, hvis man ønsker at skifte fly.
My constituent also feels that it is wrong that one can bring duty-free items into the EU from outside quite freely, but, if one wants to change planes, the same duty-free item is confiscated.
Min vælger erkender, at han selv har det endelige ansvar for at overholde denne politik; han mener imidlertid, at han skulle være blevet gjort opmærksom på en sådan politik, inden han foretog sit toldfri indkøb.
My constituent realises that he has the ultimate responsibility when it comes to adhering to this policy; however, he feels that he should have been notified of such a policy before making a duty-free purchase.
Han frygter, at mange mennesker unødigt går i denne fælde og mister varer, som de i god tro har betalt for.
He fears that many people are falling into this trap unnecessarily, losing goods that were paid for in good faith.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvem der er ansvarlig for at advare de rejsende om, at toldfrie indkøb risikerer at blive konfiskeret?
Can the Commission confirm who is responsible for alerting the travelling public that duty-free purchases may be confiscated?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0780/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0780/09
af Atanas Paparizov (PSE) , Bilyana Ilieva Raeva (ALDE) , Dushana Zdravkova (PPE-DE) , Evgeni Kirilov (PSE) , Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova (ALDE) , Iliana Malinova Iotova (PSE) , Kristian Vigenin (PSE) , Mariela Velichkova Baeva (ALDE) , Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva (PSE) , Metin Kazak (ALDE) , Petya Stavreva (PPE-DE) , Rumiana Jeleva (PPE-DE) , Slavi Binev (NI) , Vladimir Urutchev (PPE-DE) og Vladko Todorov Panayotov (ALDE)
by Atanas Paparizov (PSE) , Bilyana Ilieva Raeva (ALDE) , Dushana Zdravkova (PPE‑DE) , Evgeni Kirilov (PSE) , Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova (ALDE) , Iliana Malinova Iotova (PSE) , Kristian Vigenin (PSE) , Mariela Velichkova Baeva (ALDE) , Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva (PSE) , Metin Kazak (ALDE) , Petya Stavreva (PPE‑DE) , Rumiana Jeleva (PPE‑DE) , Slavi Binev (NI) , Vladimir Urutchev (PPE‑DE) and Vladko Todorov Panayotov (ALDE)
Om: Den fortsatte totale blokade af alle grænseovergange mellem Republikken Bulgarien og Den Hellenske Republik
Subject: The continuing total blockade of all border crossing points between the Republic of Bulgaria and the Hellenic Republic
Der er gået 10 dage, siden græske landmænd påbegyndte deres protester, som blokerer biltrafikken over grænsen mellem Bulgarien og Grækenland.
It has been 10 days since the start of protests by Greek farmers who are blocking vehicle traffic across the Bulgarian-Greek border.
Lastbiltransport over grænsen er blevet indstillet.
Goods vehicle movement across the border has been suspended.
Mere end 1 000 bulgarske lastbiler bliver i øjeblikket holdt tilbage ved grænseovergangen ved Kulata, hvor der er 15 km kø.
Over 1 000 Bulgarian goods vehicles are currently blocked at the border crossing at Kulata, with a 15 km tail-back.
Yderligere 500 bliver holdt tilbage ved grænseovergangen Kapitan Petko Voyvoda, og mere end 300 bliver holdt tilbage ved Zlatarevogrænseovergangen.
Over 500 more remain blocked at the border crossing at Kapitan Petko Voyvoda, and over 300 at the Zlatarevo border crossing.
Ifølge den bulgarske sammenslutning af vejtransportforbund har den fortsatte totale blokade af alle grænseovergange mellem Republikken Bulgarien og Den Hellenske Republik medført anseelige økonomiske tab for de bulgarske fragtmænd.
According to the Bulgarian Association of Road Transport Unions, the continuing total blockade of all border crossing points between the Republic of Bulgaria and the Hellenic Republic has caused considerable financial losses for Bulgarian hauliers.
De bulgarske myndigheder er stadig i gang med en grundig analyse af tabene.
Currently, a thorough analysis of the losses is being carried out by the Bulgarian authorities.
De bulgarske medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet anerkender de europæiske borgeres grundlæggende rettigheder og friheder.
The Bulgarian Members of the European Parliament acknowledge the fundamental rights and freedoms of European citizens.
Vi mener dog, at konsekvenserne af de græske landmænds protester er skadelige for alle europæiske borgere, særligt fragtmænd fra Bulgarien og andre EU-medlemsstater, som transporterer til og gennem det græske territorium.
However, we consider that the consequences of the Greek farmers' protests are detrimental to all European citizens, in particular to hauliers from Bulgaria and the other EU Member States transporting to and transiting the territory of Greece.
Desuden udgør de græske myndigheders mangel på hjælpeforanstaltninger, som kan føre til en rimelig løsning på denne krise, en alvorlig trussel mod overholdelse af de grundlæggende principper for det indre marked, som for eksempel den frie bevægelighed for varer og personer.
Moreover, the lack of any remedial measures by the Greek authorities to find a reasonable solution to this crisis seriously threatening to breach the fundamental principles of the internal market, such as free movement of goods and persons.
Med hensyn til disse omstændigheder: 1.
With regard to these circumstances: 1.
Har Europa-Kommissionen taget de nødvendige forholdsregler, der er omhandlet i forordning (EF) nr. 2679/98, for at fjerne de største hindringer for handel?
Has the European Commission taken all necessary action provided for under Regulation (EC) No 2679/98 to eliminate major obstacles to trade?
Hvilke supplerende foranstaltninger eller aktioner kan Europa-Kommissionen foreslå for at forbedre situationen? 3.
What additional measures or actions can the European Commission to improve the situation? 3.
Hvilke mulige løsninger er der på europæisk plan, som kan kompensere for de tab, der er resultatet af den fortsatte totale blokade?
What are the possible remedies at European level for compensating for the losses resulting from the continuing total blockade?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0781/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0781/09
Om: Lovligheden af subsidier
Subject: Legality of subsidies
Er Kommissionen sikker på, at den økonomiske støtte, der gives til forskellige virksomheder som f.eks. bilproducenter i Det Forenede Kongerige, er i overensstemmelse med EU's lovgivning?
Is the Commission satisfied that the financial assistance given to various companies such as car manufacturers in the UK is in conformity with EC laws?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0782/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0782/09
Om: Afbrænding i stedet for genanvendelse
Subject: Burning instead of recycling
Er Kommissionen parat til at anerkende, at lokal afbrænding af affald kan være grønnere end genanvendelse?
Is the Commission prepared to acknowledge that burning waste locally may be greener than recycling?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0783/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0783/09
Om: Drivhusgasser fra genanvendelse
Subject: Greenhouse gases caused by recycling
Accepterer Kommissionen, at indsamlingen, transporten og videreforarbejdningen af genanvendeligt materiale kan forårsage en nettostigning i drivhusgasser?
Will the Commission accept that the collection, transportation and reprocessing of recyclable material could cause a net increase in greenhouse gases?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0784/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0784/09
Om: Iran og kernevåben
Subject: Iran and nuclear weapons
Hvilke skridt vil Kommissionen tage for at sikre, at Iran ikke får kernevåben?
What steps is the Commission taking to ensure that Iran does not obtain nuclear weapons?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0785/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0785/09
Om: Konsekvensanalyse af den individuelle sporing af får
Subject: Impact assessment on the individual traceability of sheep
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0786/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0786/09
Om: Staten Israels hovedstad
Subject: The capital of the State of Israel
I landeinformationen på webstedet Europa.eu oplyses det, at Staten Israels hovedstad er Jerusalem (http://ec.europa.eu/world/where/israel/index_en.htm).
In the catalogue of countries on the Europa.eu site the capital of the State of Israel is listed as Jerusalem (http://ec.europa.eu/world/where/israel/index_en.htm).
I den offentlige information på webstedet for GD Eksterne Forbindelser oplyses det, at Staten Israels hovedstad er Jerusalem, og det angives, at den »ikke er anerkendt af det internationale samfund« (http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/israel/index_en.htm).
On the public catalogue of the DG External Relations site the capital of the State of Israel is listed as Jerusalem, with the note ‘not recognised by the international community’ (http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/israel/index_en.htm).
I en henstilling fra det franske udenrigsministerium (»Recommandation concernant les noms d'États, d'habitants, de capitales, de sièges diplomatiques ou consulaires (liste établie par le ministère des affaires étrangères et européennes) — NOR: CTNX0818389X«) angives Tel-Aviv-Jaffa og Haifa som Staten Israels hovedstæder.
In a recommendation adopted by the French Foreign Ministry (Recommendation on the denomination of States, citizens, capitals and diplomatic or consular headquarters (list drawn up by the Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs) — NOR: CTNX0818389X) Tel-Aviv-Jaffa and Haifa are listed as the capitals of the State of Israel.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvilken by der er Staten Israels hovedstad?
Could the Commission clarify which is the capital of the State of Israel?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0787/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0787/09
Om: Kravet om brug af det italienske sprog i moskeerne
Subject: Imposition of the Italian language in mosques
Dette skal man gøre, så der — ligesom det er tilfældet i Emiraterne — ikke finder nogen form for prædiken sted, der ansporer til vold, i en situation, som udelukkende bør have religiøs karakter«.
This is to avoid the prospect, only too real here in the Emirates, of the preaching and inciting of hatred at what should be a religious occasion only’.
Han udtalte endvidere, at der tale om en »alvorlig sag, som man navnlig bør holde sig for øje i Italien, når man tænker på den overfladiske måde, man nogle gange tager sådanne komplekse spørgsmål op på i Italien«.
He also said that it is ‘a serious matter that requires attention, especially in Italy, given the superficial way in which we sometimes tackle issues as complex as these’.
Mener Rådet ikke, at statens krav om, at der bruges et bestemt sprog i forbindelse med forsamlinger som religiøse ceremonier, fordi det påstås at beskytte den offentlige sikkerhed og bekæmpe ansporing til had og vold, er i strid med princippet om respekt for religionsfriheden, forsamlingsfriheden og ytringsfriheden, og at det krænker principperne om proportionalitet og nødvendighed i et demokratisk samfund?
Does the Council not consider that an imposition by the State of a specific language for use at assemblies such as religious ceremonies, for reasons of supposed public safety and the fight against incitement to hatred and violence, goes against the respect for freedom of religion, of assembly and of expression and violates the principles of proportionality and necessity in a democratic society?
Mener Rådet ikke, at hvis dette krav udelukkende gælder for en bestemt religiøs eller sproglig gruppe, nemlig muslimer, der taler arabisk under ceremonierne, mens der er undtagelser for andre religioner og andre sprog — katolikker, som taler latin under religiøse ceremonier — vil der være tale om forskelsbehandling på grund af religion, sprog, etnisk tilhørsforhold og race, hvilket er forbudt i henhold til den europæiske menneskerettighedskonvention, chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder og EU-traktatens artikel 6?
Does the Council not consider that if this imposition only applies to a particular religious or linguistic group — Muslims that use Arabic during their ceremonies — and allows exceptions for other religions and languages — Catholics that use Latin in their religious ceremonies — it constitutes discrimination based on religion, language, ethnic origin and race, as forbidden by the European Convention on Human Rights, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 6 of the EU Treaty?
Hvordan agter Rådet at sørge for — navnlig her umiddelbart efter afslutningen af året for interkulturel og interreligiøs dialog — at en sådan dialog skabes, sikres eller forbedres i medlemsstaterne?
How does the Council, particularly now that the year of intercultural and interreligious dialogue has come to an end, intend to ensure that such a dialogue is established, guaranteed or improved in the Member States?
Mener Rådet ikke, at det for at bekæmpe kriminalitet er absolut nødvendigt at indsamle informationer om en eventuel ansporing til had i moskeerne, og at et forbud mod at bruge et bestemt sprog i den forbindelse blot risikerer at give næring til undergrundsaktiviteter, som det er meget vanskeligere at opdage og kontrollere?
Does the Council not consider that in order to fight crime it is crucial to gather information on possible incitement to hatred in mosques, and that, with this aim in mind, forbidding the use of a particular language would only risk encouraging underground activities that are much more difficult to uncover and control?
Rådet bekræfter på ny de grundlæggende rettigheders forrang og vil både nu og i fremtiden forsvare ytringsfriheden og religionsfriheden og forebyggelsen og udryddelsen af alle former for forskelsbehandling.
The Council reaffirms the primacy of fundamental rights and is and will remain committed to the freedom of expression and freedom of religion and to the prevention and eradication of all forms of discriminatory treatment.
Rådet vil gerne påpege, at religionsfriheden, forsamlingsfriheden og ytringsfriheden og retten til lighed for loven og beskyttelse mod forskelsbehandling for alle personer anerkendes i artikel 6, stk. 2, i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union og afspejles i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder .
The Council would point out that the freedom of religion, of assembly and of expression and the right to equality before the law and protection against discrimination for all persons are recognised by Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union and are reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Rådet kan ikke tage stilling til de specifikke foranstaltninger, som det ærede parlamentsmedlem nævner, da disse spørgsmål hører under de enkelte medlemsstaters kompetence.
As far as the specific measures mentioned by the Honourable Member are concerned, the Council is not in a position to take a view, because these issues are a matter for each individual Member State.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0788/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0788/09
Dette skal man gøre, så der — ligesom det er tilfældet i Emiraterne — ikke finder nogen form for prædiken sted, der ansporer til vold, i en situation, som udelukkende bør have religiøs karakter«.
This is to avoid the prospect, only too real here in the Emirates, of the preaching and inciting of hatred at what should be a religious occasion only'.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at statens krav om, at der bruges et bestemt sprog i forbindelse med forsamlinger som religiøse ceremonier, fordi det påstås at beskytte den offentlige sikkerhed og bekæmpe ansporing til had og vold, er i strid med princippet om respekt for religionsfriheden, forsamlingsfriheden og ytringsfriheden, og at det krænker principperne om proportionalitet og nødvendighed i et demokratisk samfund?
Does the Commission not consider that an imposition by the State of a specific language for use at assemblies such as religious ceremonies, for reasons of supposed public safety and the fight against incitement to hatred and violence, goes against the respect for freedom of religion, of assembly and of expression and violates the principles of proportionality and necessity in a democratic society?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at hvis dette krav udelukkende gælder for en bestemt religiøs eller sproglig gruppe, nemlig muslimer, der taler arabisk under ceremonierne, mens der er undtagelser for andre religioner og andre sprog — katolikker, som taler latin under religiøse ceremonier — vil der være tale om forskelsbehandling på grund af religion, sprog, etnisk tilhørsforhold og race, hvilket er forbudt i henhold til den europæiske menneskerettighedskonvention, chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder og EU-traktatens artikel 6?
Does the Commission not consider that if this imposition only applies to a particular religious or linguistic group — Muslims that use Arabic during their ceremonies — and allows exceptions for other religions and languages — Catholics that use Latin in their religious ceremonies — it constitutes discrimination based on religion, language, ethnic origin and race, as forbidden by the European Convention on Human Rights, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 6 of the EU Treaty?
Hvordan agter Kommissionen at sørge for — navnlig her umiddelbart efter afslutningen af året for interkulturel og interreligiøs dialog — at en sådan dialog skabes, sikres eller forbedres i medlemsstaterne?
How does the Commission, particularly now that the year of intercultural and interreligious dialogue has come to an end, intend to ensure that such a dialogue is established, guaranteed or improved in the Member States?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at det for at bekæmpe kriminalitet er absolut nødvendigt at indsamle informationer om en eventuel ansporing til had i moskeerne, og at et forbud mod at bruge et bestemt sprog i den forbindelse blot risikerer at give næring til undergrundsaktiviteter, som det er meget vanskeligere at opdage og kontrollere?
Does the Commission not consider that in order to fight crime it is crucial to gather information on possible incitement to hatred in mosques, and that, with this aim in mind, forbidding the use of a particular language would only risk encouraging underground activities that are much more difficult to uncover and control?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0789/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0789/09
Om: Udenlandske rejsebuschaufførers tvungne aflevering af kørekortet i Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland, hvorved de også afholdes fra at udøve deres erhverv i andre lande
Subject: Requirement in the Federal Republic of Germany for foreign coach drivers to surrender their driving licences, making it impossible for them to carry out their work in other countries