natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For så vidt angår begivenhederne i anledning af kvindedemonstrationen den 6. marts 2005, som det ærede medlem henviser til, vil Rådet gerne minde om, at Den Europæiske Unions repræsentanter lige inden ministermødet mellem EU og Tyrkiet den 7. marts 2005 i Ankara havde fremsat en offentlig erklæring, hvori de fordømte enhver form for vold, understregede betydningen af spørgsmålet om kvinders rettigheder og gav udtryk for deres bekymring over en så umådeholden anvendelse af magt over for demonstranterne.
As regards the events associated with the women's demonstration on 6 March, to which the Honourable Member refers, the Council would point out that just before the Ministerial meeting between the Union and Turkey on 7 March in Ankara, the European Union's representatives at the meeting made a public statement in which they condemned all violence, emphasised the importance of the issue of women's rights and voiced their concern at such disproportionate use of force against demonstrators.
De anmodede de tyrkiske myndigheder om at foretage en undersøgelse af disse begivenheder for at forebygge en gentagelse heraf i fremtiden, og der er givet garantier om, det dette vil ske.
They asked the Turkish authorities — who gave assurances on this point — to conduct an investigation into these events in order to prevent the recurrence of such incidents in the future.
Der er på nuværende tidspunkt undersøgelser i gang på forskellige niveauer i Tyrkiet, og i mellemtiden er politibetjente blevet suspenderet fra tjenesten.
Investigations at various levels are currently in progress in Turkey and the policemen involved have now been suspended from duty.
Rådet forsikrer om, at det nøje vil overvåge udviklingen i denne sag.
The Council is following developments in this affair closely.
Rådet finder imidlertid ikke, at det er hensigtsmæssigt at udtale sig om hypoteser: hvis lignende begivenheder indtræffer i fremtiden, vil hvert enkelt tilfælde skulle vurderes individuelt, men altid med afsæt i de principper og kriterier, der allerede er nævnt i dette svar.
However, the Council considers that there is nothing to be gained from commenting on a speculative basis: if similar incidents recur in future, they should be assessed case by case, but always in the light of the principles and criteria already referred to at the beginning of this reply.
Rådet finder således, at de forsikringer, der er givet med hensyn til overvågningen af reformprocessen i Tyrkiet, også dækker alle de specifikke tilfælde, som det ærede medlem nævner i de to andre forespørgsler, men det ønsker ikke at udtale sig i detaljer herom.
Similarly, the Council considers that the assurances which it has given concerning the monitoring of the reform process in Turkey also cover all specific cases, such as those mentioned by the Honourable Member in his two other questions, which it does not wish to comment on in detail.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1042/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1042/05
Om: Domfældelse af en vittighedstegner i Tyrkiet
Subject: Conviction of cartoonist in Turkey
I Tyrkiet er den politiske vittighedstegner Musa Kart af en domstol blevet dømt til at betale en erstatning på 3.000 euro på grund af en tegning i dagbladet »Cumhuriyet«.
A court in Turkey has sentenced the political cartoonist Musa Kart to pay € 3000 in compensation for publishing a cartoon in the newspaper Cumhuriyet.
Den pågældende tegning viste premierminister Erdogan som en kat, der var viklet ind i et garnnøgle.
The cartoon to which exception was taken depicted Prime Minister Erdogan as a cat entangled in a ball of wool.
Teksten lød: »Tag det roligt, jeg skal nok få redet alle trådene ud«.
The cat is saying: ‘Don't worry, I promise I'll sort this out’.
Premierministeren anlagde sag på grund af denne relativt uskyldige tegning og opnåede en domfældelse.
The Prime Minister submitted a complaint about this relatively harmless cartoon and secured a conviction.
Det sker - også efter den 17. december 2004 - regelmæssigt, at kritiske journalister i Tyrkiet i retten bliver dømt for »undergravende virksomhed«.
The courts in Turkey regularly interfere with critical journalists, accusing them of ‘undermining the State’, and have continued to do so since 17 December 2004.
Har Rådet taget kontakt til de tyrkiske myndigheder på grundlag af denne hændelse og andre, tilsvarende tilfælde?
Has the Council contacted the Turkish Government about this specific incident and about other similar ones?
Hvilken reaktion har det opnået?
What response has it received?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1043/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1043/05
Om: Gennemførelsen af VVM-direktiverne i Flandern
Subject: Transposition of EIA directives by Flanders
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvordan det går med sagen mod Belgien for ikke at gennemføre direktiv 97/11/EF inden for den fastsatte frist, samt hvad der vil i ske i sagen nu, hvor gennemførelsen er sket?
What stage has been reached in the legal proceedings against Belgium for failure to transpose Directive 97/11/EC in time, and what will happen to these proceedings now that the directive has been transposed?
Finder Kommissionen, at den flamske regionalregerings afgørelse af 10.12.2004 er en tilstrækkelig gennemførelse af ovennævnte direktiv?
Does the Flemish Government Decree of 10 December 2004 constitute an adequate transposition of the directives?
Er Kommissionen enig med den flamske regionalregering i, at drift af luft- og søhavne ikke er omfattet af VVM-bestemmelserne?
Does the Commission agree with the Flemish Government that the operation of ports and airports does not require an EIA?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1044/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1044/05
Om: Oberst Hamid Pourmand
Subject: Colonel Hamid Pourmand
Han er endnu ikke blevet dømt for frafald fra den islamiske tro af det totalitære iranske teokratis domstole.
In addition to this military court ruling, he may in fact also be charged separately on two other counts before the Sharia court.
Det er muligt, at han foruden denne dom afsagt af militærdomstolen vil blive stævnet for sharia-domstolen.
Only these possible new charges will cover the issue of apostasy.
Kun disse nye anklager vil kunne dække spørgsmålet om frafald, og hvis Hamid Pourmand kendes skyldig, vil han kunne blive dømt til døden.
If Hamid Pourmand is found guilty, he may be sentenced to death.
Jeg har også modtaget informationer om, at hans vanærende udvisning af hæren har ført til, at han har mistet sit hjem, sin familie, der nu er kommet i en miserabel situation, sin løn og sin pension, som han ville have haft ret til for omtrent 20 års tjeneste.
I have also been informed that, as a result of his dishonourable discharge from the army, he has lost his house, his family (which is now reduced to living in extreme poverty), his pay and the pension to which he was entitled for 20 years' service.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om det er lykkedes den at skaffe mere troværdige oplysninger om denne sag fra de medlemsstater, der har en repræsentation i Iran, eller har den forsøgt at indhente oplysninger direkte fra de iranske myndigheder?
Will the Commission state whether it has succeeded in obtaining reliable information on this case from the Member States which have a representation in Iran or whether it has tried to obtain any information directly from the Iranian authorities?
Kan Kommissionen redegøre for den direkte forbindelse mellem det iranske teokratis voksende krænkelser af menneskerettighederne og de handelsaftaler og aftaler om bekæmpelse af den iranske opposition, som EU har indgået, og som Kommissionen systematisk har forsvaret?
Will the Commission clarify the direct link between the increasing human rights violations committed by the Iranian theocracy and the agreements on trade and on combating the Iranian opposition which have been concluded by the European Union and systematically upheld by the Commission?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1045/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1045/05
Om: Lov om »hovedaktionær« og besøg af højtstående regeringsrepræsentanter hos generaldirektøren for det indre marked, Schaub
Subject: ‘Primary shareholder’ law and visit of high-level government delegation to the Director-General for the internal market, Alexander Schaub
Anmodede Schaub de to ministre og statssekretæren om skriftlige forklaringer (inden for en frist på 15 dage) på loven om »hovedaktionær«?
Will the Commission say whether Mr. Schaub asked the two ministers and the deputy minister for written explanations (within 15 days) concerning the ‘primary shareholder’ law?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1046/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1046/05
Om: Våbenleverancer til Tanzania
Subject: Arms supplies to Tanzania
I midten af februar blev det offentligt kendt, at regionen Vallonien havde givet virksomheden New Lachaussèe våbeneksportlicens med henblik på indledning af produktion af ammunition i Tanzania.
In mid-February, it came to public attention that the Walloon Region of Belgium had issued an arms export permit to New Lachaussée to enable a munitions production line to be started up in Tanzania.
Mindre end et år tidligere, havde regionen nægtet at give denne licens.
Barely one year earlier, it had been refused such a permit.
Den 3. marts 2005 kunne man blandt rådene til de rejsende på det belgiske udenrigsministeriums hjemmeside, diplomatie.be, læse, at Tanzania på baggrund af den øgede risiko for terrorisme i hele verden nu er et af de lande, hvor risikoen for terrorhandlinger er øget.
On 3 March 2005, the travel advice on diplomatie.be, the website of the Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, included the following statement: ‘In view of the worldwide rise in the risk of terrorism, Tanzania is among the countries where the risk of acts of terrorism is higher than elsewhere (…) If travelling to the regions bordering on Burundi, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, it is advisable to take care.
I forbindelse med rejser ved grænsen til Burundi, Rwanda og Den demokratiske Republik Congo blev det tilrådet at være meget forsigtig.
The north-west of the country, particularly the Kigoma region and the west of the Kagera region, is unsafe because of raids from the neighbouring countries by armed bands.
Det oplystes, at landets nordvestlige del, navnlig regionen Kigoma og den vestlige del af regionen Kagera gøres usikker af bevæbnede bander, der foretager raids fra nabolandene, og at der også befinder sig flygtningelejre i dette område.
There are also refugee camps in these areas.’
Er Rådet enig med den vallonske region i, at forholdene i Tanzania er blevet forbedret de seneste år, og at landet derfor opfylder forudsætningerne for at der nu kan indledes en produktion af ammunition?
Does the Council agree with the Walloon Region that the situation in Tanzania has improved significantly in the past year and that the country is therefore now ready to start up a munitions production line?
Kan Rådet oplyse, om denne tilladelse til våbeneksport er i overensstemmelse med den europæiske adfærdskodeks for våbeneksport, navnlig med kriterium 4 om opretholdelse af regional fred, sikkerhed og stabilitet og kriterium 7 om uønsket videresalg?
Does this arms export permit accord with the European Code of Conduct on Arms Exports, particularly Criterion 4 regarding the preservation of regional peace, security and stability and Criterion 7 regarding the existence of a risk that the equipment will be diverted or re-exported under undesirable conditions?
Rådet har ikke drøftet den vallonske regions vurdering af situationen i Tanzania.
The Council has not discussed the Walloon region's evaluation of the situation in Tanzania.
Det påhviler medlemsstaterne at gennemføre EU's adfærdskodeks for våbeneksport.
The implementation of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports falls within the responsibility of the Member States.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1047/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1047/05
Er Kommissionen enig med den vallonske region i, at forholdene i Tanzania er blevet forbedret de seneste år, og at landet derfor opfylder forudsætningerne for at der nu kan indledes en produktion af ammunition?
Does the Commission agree with the Walloon Region that the situation in Tanzania has improved significantly in the past year and that the country is therefore now ready to start up a munitions production line?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om denne tilladelse til våbeneksport er i overensstemmelse med den europæiske adfærdskodeks for våbeneksport, navnlig med kriterium 4 om opretholdelse af regional fred, sikkerhed og stabilitet og kriterium 7 om uønsket videresalg?
Does this arms export permit accord with the European Code of Conduct on Arms Exports, particularly Criterion 4 regarding the preservation of regional peace, security and stability and Criterion 7 regarding the existence of a risk that the equipment will be diverted or re-exported under undesirable conditions?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1048/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1048/05
Om: Eksklusivkontrakter med bryggeri
Subject: Exclusive brewery contracts
I en pressemeddelelse af 15. april 2003 (IP/03/545) behandler Kommissionen den måde, hvorpå bryggeriet Interbrews belgiske virksomheder inden for hotel- og restaurationsbranchen åbnes for konkurrerende ølmærker.
In its press release of 15 April 2003 (IP/03/545), the Commission referred to the way in which Interbrew's Belgian hotels, restaurants and cafés (‘horeca outlets’) were being opened up to competing beer brands.
Det anføres, bl.a. i pressemeddelelsen, at et bryggeri med en markedsandel på ikke over 30 % af udskænkningsstederne ifølge gruppefritagelsesforordningen kan forpligte disse til at indkøbe alt deres øl hos dette bryggeri som kompensation for et femårigt lån eller så længe den ansvarlige person lejer eller fremlejer lokalerne af bryggeriet.
The press release includes the following statement: ‘This Block Exemption Regulation allows a brewer with a market share not exceeding 30% to oblige horeca outlets to buy all their beer from it in exchange for a five year loan or for as long as they would lease or sub-lease the premises from it.’
Mener Kommissionen, at bryggerier med en markedsandel på under 30 % også kan forpligte deres kontraktpartnere inden for hotel- og restaurationsbranchen til at aftage deres mærkevarer fra eksklusive leverandører, hvilket kan føre til ågerpriser, der overstiger priserne på det private marked?
Does not the Commission consider that brewers with a market share of less than 30% are also capable of compelling their horeca outlets to buy their own-brand products from exclusive suppliers, which may result in the charging of extortionate prices that exceed prices on the private market?
Hvilke foranstaltninger kan og vil Kommissionen i bekræftende fald træffe for også at standse denne praksis? —
If so, what measures can and will the Commission take to put an end to these practices? —
Hvilke argumenter vil Kommissionen i benægtende fald anføre for at afvise denne påstand?
If not, on what grounds does it not accept the above arguments?
Er det overhovedet lovligt og acceptabelt, at bryggerier, der gør brug af ovennævnte klausuler, forpligter deres cafeejere til at indkøbe drikkevarerne hos eksklusive leverandører til priser, der ligger væsentligt - i nogle tilfælde 80 % - over de normale forbrugerpriser.
Is it, in any case, legal and acceptable for breweries which take advantage of the above clauses to compel their landlords to buy their beverages from exclusive suppliers at prices which very substantially exceed the normal retail price on the open market - sometimes by as much as 80%?
Jeg har f. eks. hørt om en cafeejer, der af sit bryggeri blev forpligtet til hos en eksklusiv leverandør at indkøbe kasser med pilsnerøl til 12 euro pr. 24 flasker, mens enhver forbruger i stormarkeder kunne købe den samme kasse øl til 7 euro pr. 24 flasker.
I have been quoted the example of a landlord whose brewer compelled him to buy crates of lager from an exclusive beer supplier at a price of € 12 per 24 bottles, despite the fact that any consumer could buy the same beer for € 7 per 24 bottles at a large store.
Er ovennævnte praksis lovlig og acceptabel? —
Is the above practice legal and acceptable? —
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe imod den?
What steps can be taken against this?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1051/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1051/05
af Maria Berger (PSE)
by Maria Berger (PSE)
(17. marts 2005)
(17 March 2005)
Om: Gennemførelse i Østrig af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv af 9. december 2002 om forsikringsformidling
Subject: Transposition into Austrian national law of Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation
I Østrig beklager de berørte erhvervsgrupper sig over den sene, omkostningskrævende og ufuldstændige gennemførelse.
In Austria, the professional groups concerned are complaining that transposition of the Directive is late, expensive and incomplete.
Har Kommissionen allerede modtaget meddelelser om direktivets gennemførelse i medlemsstaterne, og er der eksempler på, at gennemførelsen er accepteret af de berørte erhvervsgrupper?
Has the Commission already been notified by the Member States that the Directive has been duly transposed into national law, and has it been transposed in any country to the satisfaction of the professional groups involved?
Er det korrekt, at direktivet endnu ikke er gennemført i specielt Tyskland?
Is it true that the Directive has not yet been transposed into national law in, to take a prime example, Germany?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1052/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1052/05
Om: Antikristne aktiviteter udfoldet af det tyrkiske Direktorat for Religiøse Anliggender (DRA), som er undergivet Statsministeriet
Subject: Anti-Christian activities of the Turkish Directorate of Religious Affairs (DRA), which comes under the authority of the Prime Minister's Office
Kommissionen gav den 6. oktober 2004 udtryk for bekymring i relation til den nul tolerance-politik, som Tyrkiet skal følge i forbindelse med »styrkelse og anvendelse i praksis af bestemmelser vedrørende ytringsfrihed, religionsfrihed, kvinders rettigheder, fagforeningsrettigheder og mindretals rettigheder«.
On 6 October 2004, the Commission noted concern about the zero-tolerance policy that Turkey should follow ‘in the strengthening and implementation of provisions relating to freedom of expression, freedom of religion, women’s rights, trade union rights and minority rights.’
I prædiken tales der om europæiske kræfter, »som forsøger at ophæve det tyrkiske folks forbindelser til islam, fordi de ser det som den største hindring for deres herredømme.
In this sermon, reference is made to European powers, ‘which are trying to sever Turkey's people's links to Islam because they see it as the biggest obstacle to their domination.
Disse meget velorganiserede kræfter benytter etniske forskelle og økonomiske og politiske problemer til at lokke vores børn.
These highly organised forces are using ethnic differences and economic and political hardship to entice our children.
Det er især dem, der ikke har tilstrækkelige religiøse kundskaber, der bliver ofre for sådanne angreb.«
Those who lack proper religious knowledge in particular fall victim to such attacks.’
DRA er tilknyttet Statsministeriet.
The DRA is attached to the Prime Minister's office.
Det skal udføre aktiviteter, der vedrører den islamiske religions trossætninger: principperne om gudsdyrkelse og moral, samfundets religiøse oplysning og forvaltningen af de steder, hvor gudsdyrkelsen foregår.
The DRA must carry out activities related to the beliefs of the Islamic religion: the principles of worship and morality, the religious enlightenment of society, and management of the places of worship.
DRA har over 80.000 medarbejdere og organisationer i hele Tyrkiet og i udlandet.
The DRA has over 80000 staff and organisations all over Turkey and abroad.
Det skal bistå muslimske borgere i Tyrkiet og i udlandet med at opfylde deres religiøse forpligtelser.
It must assist Muslim citizens in Turkey and abroad to fulfil their religious obligations.
Er Kommissionen enig i, at beskrivelsen af DRA's opgaver og den måde, det opererer på, ikke er i overensstemmelse med EU's krav om religionsfrihed?
Does the Commission agree that the task description of the DRA, as well as the way it operates, is not in line with European demands for freedom of religious expression?
Hvordan vurderer Kommissionen DRA's og dets aktiviteter indvirkning på det kristne mindretal i Tyrkiet og på kristne ngo'er, der arbejder i Tyrkiet?
How does the Commission assess the impact of the DRA and its activities on the Christian minority in Turkey and on Christian NGOs working in Turkey?
Den 6. marts 2005 knuste det tyrkiske politi en demonstration for kvinders rettigheder.
On 6 March 2005, the Turkish police crushed a women's rights demonstration.
Kommissionen klagede til de tyrkiske myndigheder.
The Commission filed a complaint with the Turkish authorities.
Vil Kommissionen klage igen, denne gang over DRA's advarsler mod de »europæiske kræfter«, som de har identificeret?
Will the Commission again complain, this time with respect to the DRA warnings against the ‘European forces’ identified by them?
Hvordan ser Kommissionen på Tyrkiets ansøgning om optagelse i EU på baggrund af beskrivelsen af DRA's opgaver og dets rolle i Tyrkiet?
How does the Commission assess Turkey's application for accession to the EU against the background of the task description and the role of the DRA in Turkey?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1053/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1053/05
Om: Modstridende oplysninger fra Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig
Subject: Conflicting information from the European Anti-Fraud Office
Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) har fastholdt, at det intet har at gøre med de belgiske myndigheders beslutning om at ransage den tyske journalist Hans-Martin Tillacks hjem og kontor.
The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) has maintained that it had nothing to do with the Belgian authorities’ decision to search the home and office of the German journalist Hans-Martin Tillack.
I følge den officielle båndudskrift fra mødet i Budgetkontroludvalget den 7. april 2004, udtalte hr. Peter Baader, som er tjenestemand i OLAF's afdeling for indre efterforskning, at OLAF på intet tidspunkt havde brugt ordet »ransagning« i sin kommunikation med de retslige myndigheder.
According to the official tape recording of the meeting of the Committee on Budgetary Control of 7 April 2004, Mr Peter Baader, an official in OLAF’s Internal Investigations Department, stated that OLAF had at no time used the word ‘search’ in its communications with the judicial authorities concerning Mr Tillack.
Kan Kommissionen gøre rede for, hvordan den agter at straffe ledende tjenestemænd i OLAF for at fremsætte så indlysende usandfærdige udsagn over for Europa-Parlamentet, og hvilke skridt den vil tage for at undgå lignende situationer i fremtiden?
Can the Commission state how it proposes to punish leading OLAF officials for making such apparently untrue statements to the European Parliament and what measures it proposes to take to prevent similar situations in future?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1054/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1054/05
Om: Mulige grunde til de forskellige vidneudsagn imod journalist Hans-Martin Tillack
Subject: Possible reasons for the different testimonies against the journalist Hans-Martin Tillack
Den tidligere Kommissionstalsmand Joachim Gross synes at have fremsat modstridende påstande om kilden til sin beskyldning mod den tyske journalist Hans-Martin Tillack for evt. at have betalt tjenestemænd i EU for at få adgang til dokumenter.
Former Commission spokesman Joachim Gross seems to have made contradictory claims about the source of his allegation that the German journalist, Hans-Martin Tillack, might have paid EU officials in order to obtain documents.
Version 1 går ud på, at hr. Gross modtog sine oplysninger fra en jornalist ved »Stern« ved navn Wilfried Krause.
Version 1 is that Mr Gross received this information from a ‘Stern’ journalist called Wilfried Krause.
Denne version tog OLAF op i klager til de offentlige anklagere i Bruxelles og Hamburg.
This version was taken up by OLAF in complaints to the Public Prosecutors in Brussels and Hamburg.
Før hr. Gross mødte hr. Buttice, hævdede han, at »Stern«-journalisten var hans kilde.
Before Mr Gross met Mr Buttice, he alleged that the ‘Stern’ journalist was his source.