natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En WHO-rammeaftale om begrænsning af tobaksforbruget (FCTC), som er ratificeret af Fællesskabet og en lang række medlemsstater, indeholder en retlig forpligtelse til at indføre »effektive (...) foranstaltninger for at beskytte mod passiv rygning på arbejdspladser i lukkede rum, offentlige transportmidler eller andre lukkede offentlige steder og evt. på andre offentlige steder«.
The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) ratified by the Community and a majority of Member States creates a legal obligation to provide ‘effective (…) protection from exposure to tobacco smoke in indoor workplaces, public transport, indoor public places and, as appropriate, other public places’.
Det fremgår af besvarelsen af min forespørgsel nr. E-0549/09 , at Kommissionen for at gennemføre denne rammeaftale plæderer for omfattende rygeforbud.
The reply to my Question E‑0549/09 suggests that the Commission advocates comprehensive smoking bans in order to implement this framework Convention.
Planlægger eller diskuterer man i forbindelse med revisionen af tobaksdirektivet et rygeforbud i hele EU?
In connection with the revision of the Tobacco Products Directive, is an EU‑wide ban on smoking being planned or discussed?
I hvilken udstrækning har man gennemført FCTC-forpligtelserne i EU-institutionernes og -agenturernes bygninger?
To what extent have FCTC obligations been implemented in the buildings of EU institutions and agencies?
Hvilke opfølgende foranstaltninger til den sidste høring har man overvejet?
What follow‑up measures to the last hearing have been considered?
Der overvejes intet EU-rygeforbud, for så vidt angår en eventuel ændring af direktivet om tobaksvarer.
No EU wide ban of smoking is being considered in the context of the possible revision of the Tobacco Products Directive.
Der har været et totalt forbud mod at ryge i Kommissionens bygninger siden den 1. maj 2004.
Smoking has been totally banned in Commission's buildings since 1 May 2004.
Hvad angår andre EU-institutioner, er Kommissionen ikke i stand til at oplyse, hvordan dette emne behandles.
As regards other EU‑institutions, the Commission is not in a position to provide information on how this issue is addressed.
Med hensyn til opfølgningsforanstaltninger for røgfrie miljøer opfordrer Kommissionen kraftigt medlemsstaterne til at vedtage rygeforbud, og den følger nøje udviklingen inden for dette område.
As regards follow-up actions on smoke-free environments, the Commission strongly encourages Member States to adopt smoke free laws and is closely following progress in this area.
Kommissionen eller nationale kontaktpunkter, der er udpeget af medlemsstaterne, arbejder tæt sammen om gennemførelsen af Rådets henstilling om røgfrie miljøer.
The Commission or National Focal Points designated by the Member States are cooperating closely on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on smoke-free environments.
For så vidt angår yderligere bekæmpelse af tobaksrygning, iværksatte Kommissionen den 24. september 2010 en offentlig høring om en eventuel ændring af direktivet om tobaksvarer.
As regards other tobacco control activities, the Commission launched a public consultation on a possible revision of the Tobacco Products Directive on 24 September 2010.
Høringen løber indtil den 17. december 2010.
The consultation will run until 17 December 2010.
Derudover har Kommissionen også afsluttet den første fase af sin høring af arbejdsmarkedets parter i EU om et eventuelt initiativ om beskyttelse af arbejdstagernes sikkerhed og sundhed under arbejdet.
Furthermore, the Commission has also completed the first stage consultation of the social partners at EU level on a possible initiative in the area of the protection of the health and safety of workers at work.
Der er planlagt en ny høringsrunde for 2011.
A second stage of consultations, is planned for 2011.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8271/2010
Question for written answer E-8271/2010
Om: Vorarlbergs lov om handel med fast ejendom
Subject: Vorarlberg land transfer law
Udlændinges handel med land- og skovbrugsgrunde er i Østrig reguleret i ni forskellige love om handel med fast ejendom på grund af delstaternes kompetence.
Rules on the transfer of agricultural and forestry land by foreigners in Austria are laid down in nine different land transfer laws, on the basis of the Land responsible.
I Vorarlberg gælder lov om handel med fast ejendom, Vorarlbergs lovtidende 2004/42 jf. Vorarlbergs lovtidende 2009/19.
In Vorarlberg the law on the transfer of land ( Land law gazette 2004/42, in the version of Land law gazette 2009/19) is applicable.
Ifølge denne lov skal en ikkelandbrugers køb af et landbrugsareal på over 1.000 m 2 før godkendelsen bekendtgøres offentligt.
Pursuant to this law, the acquisition of an area of agricultural land of over 1 000 m² by a non‑farmer must be made public prior to authorisation being given.
Bekendtgørelsen foretages af den kommune, hvor grunden er beliggende, idet brugeren også skal orienteres, ved offentligt opslag med en frist på en måned.
The announcement is made by the local authority of the locality, with the farm manager also required to be notified, through a notice on the official noticeboard, with one month's notice.
Nabolandbrugere har så mulighed for at erhverve grunden til den på stedet sædvanlige pris (Vorarlbergs lovtidende 2009/19).
Neighbouring farmers then have the opportunity to acquire the land at the usual local price ( Land law gazette 2009/19).
Dette lovregulerede »tvangssalg« er efter delstatsregeringens opfattelse i overensstemmelse med fællesskabsrettens grundlæggende frihedrettigheder.
In the Land government's view, this ‘compulsory purchase’ laid down by law is compatible with the fundamental freedoms enshrined in Community law.
Da købsprisen imidlertid med denne lov unddrages sælgers disposition, er der dog betænkeligheder ved, om den er retmæssig.
As the Land law means that the purchase price is no longer at the discretion of the vendor, there are, however, doubts about its legality.
Der er allerede indsendt en klage til Kommissionen om dette spørgsmål.
In the light of these concerns, a complaint has already been made to the Commission.
Delstatsregeringen i Vorarlberg overvejer i øjeblikket reformer af bygge- og planlovgivningen.
The Vorarlberg Land government is currently considering reforms to building and regional planning law.
Offentligheden har imidlertid ikke adgang til at følge dette arbejde.
The current state of affairs with regard to the procedure is, however, being withheld from the public.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med bestemmelserne i Vorarlbergs lov om handel med fast ejendom?
Is the Commission familiar with the provisions laid down in the Vorarlberg law on the transfer of land?
Er der indsendt klager til Kommissionen mod de pågældende bestemmelser?
Have complaints already been lodged with the Commission against the provisions at issue?
Hvis ja, hvad er status for denne sag?
If so, what is the state of affairs with regard to the procedure?
Har denne klage ført til handling fra Kommissionens side eller til en prøvning af loven ved EF-Domstolen?
Have these complaints led to action by the Commission or an examination of the law by the European Court of Justice?
Er bestemmelserne i Vorarlbergs lov om handel med fast ejendom efter Kommissionens opfattelse i strid med gældende EU-lovgivning?
In the Commission's view, do the provisions of the Vorarlberg law on the transfer of land contravene applicable EC law?
Hvad vil Kommissionen gøre, hvis de pågældende regler er i strid med EU-lovgivningen?
What does the Commission intend to do in the event that the provisions at issue contravene EC law?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8272/2010
Question for written answer E-8272/2010
Om: Specialiserede sikkerhedsfirmaer i Afghanistan
Subject: Specialist security companies in Afghanistan
Sikkerheden i forbindelse med gennemførelsen af EU-projekter i Afghanistan, som finansieres over Kommissionens budget, sikres primært af specialiserede sikkerhedsfirmaer (»companies specialized in the security of persons and premises«).
Security for those carrying out EU projects in Afghanistan funded by the Commission's budget is mainly provided by companies specialised in the security of persons and premises.
Hvilke er samtlige de private sikkerhedsfirmaer, som Kommissionen samarbejder med?
What are the private security companies with which the Commission cooperates?
I hvilke lande er disse firmaer hjemmehørende?
In which countries do these companies have their registered office?
Samarbejder Kommissionen foruden de specialiserede sikkerhedsfirmaer også med andre partnere, der sørger for sikkerheden i forbindelse med gennemførelsen af projekter i Afghanistan, som finansieres over Kommissionens budget?
Apart from specialist security companies, does the Commission also cooperate with other partners which provide security for those carrying out projects funded by the Commission's budget?
Hvis ja, hvilke?
If so, which partners?
Hvordan kontrollerer Kommissionen valget af sine lokale partnere i Afghanistan, herunder de specialiserede sikkerhedsfirmaer, som den samarbejder med?
How does the Commission monitor the choice of its local partners in Afghanistan, including specialist security companies with which it cooperates?
Kan Kommissionen være sikker på disse partneres solidaritet og loyalitet?
Can the Commission be sure of the solidarity and loyalty of these partners?
Evaluerer Kommissionen, hvilke formål de lokale samarbejdspartneres, herunder de specialiserede sikkerhedsfirmaers indtægter, som opstår gennem EU's sikkerhedsudgifter, anvendes til?
Does the Commission assess for what purposes the income derived by local partners, including specialist security companies, from EU security expenditure is used?
Hvilke resultater er Kommissionen kommet til?
What conclusions has the Commission reached?
Kan Kommissionen garantere, at EU-sikkerhedsudgifter ikke ad omveje tilflyder terrorister?
Can the Commission guarantee that no EU security expenditure is getting into the hands of terrorists via an indirect route?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8273/2010
Question for written answer E-8273/2010
Om: »Crisis Room«: Fusionering med WKC og Det Fælles Situationscenter
Subject: Crisis Room: merger with the Watchkeeping Capability and the Joint Situation Centre (SitCen)
Ifølge et organigram fra den europæiske udenrigstjeneste skal det nuværende Fælles Situationscenter (SitCen) udvides gennem en sammenlægning med Kommissionens »Crisis Room«.
According to an organigram for the European external action service, the current Joint Situation Centre (SitCen) is being enlarged through a merger with the Commission's Crisis Room.
Desuden berettes det i medierne, at den såkaldte Watchkeeping Capability (WKC) ligeledes skal integreres i situationscentret.
In addition, it is reported in the media that the Watchkeeping Capability is also being incorporated into the SitCen.
Hvor stort var budgettet for »Crisis Room« i årene 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 og 2006?
How high was the Crisis Room's budget in 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006?
Hvor mange medarbejdere var der ansat i »Crisis Room« i de nævnte fem år?
How many staff were employed by the Crisis Room in the above five years?
Hvad er det konkrete opgaveområde for »Crisis Room«?
What is the specific remit of the Crisis Room?
Kan Kommissionen fremlægge et organigram for den interne struktur i »Crisis Room«?
Could the Commission provide an organigram for the Crisis Room's internal structure?
Hvilken merværdi har fusioneringen af »Crisis Room« med WKC og Det Fælles Situationscenter?
What added value will the merger of the Crisis Room with the Watchkeeping Capability and the SitCen bring?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8274/2010
Question for written answer E-8274/2010
Om: Private sikkerhedsfirmaer i Afghanistan
Subject: Private security companies in Afghanistan
Det fremgår af Kommissionens svar på forespørgsler fra Parlamentet, at private sikkerhedsfirmaer ifølge et dekret fra den afghanske præsident af 17. august 2010 skal indstille deres virksomhed i Afghanistan inden udgangen af 2010.
As the Commission's answers to parliamentary questions indicate, pursuant to a decree issued by the Afghan President on 17 August 2010 private specialist security companies in Afghanistan must cease their activities by the end of 2010.
Sikkerheden i forbindelse med gennemførelsen af EU-projekter i Afghanistan, som finansieres over Kommissionens budget, sikres primært af private, specialiserede sikkerhedsfirmaer.
Security for those carrying out EU projects in Afghanistan funded by the Commission's budget is mainly provided by private specialist security companies.
Hvad betyder dette dekret i praksis for Kommissionens arbejde i Afghanistan?
What does this decree mean in practice for the Commission's work in Afghanistan?
Hvilke konsekvenser har dette dekret for Kommissionens sikkerhedsudgifter i Afghanistan i euro?
What impact will this decree have on the Commission's security expenditure in Afghanistan in euros?
Hvem vil i fremtiden sørge for sikkerheden?
By whom will security be provided in future?
Har den afghanske regering allerede udviklet den nødvendige kapacitet til at varetage denne opgave?
Has the Afghan Government already developed the necessary capacity for this?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8275/2010
Question for written answer E-8275/2010
Om: »Crisis Room«-samarbejde med Schweiz
Subject: Crisis Room — cooperation with Switzerland
Eksisterer der et samarbejde mellem »Crisis Room« og Schweiz?
Is there cooperation between the Crisis Room and Switzerland?
Hvilken form tager det i givet fald, og hvor længe har det eksisteret?
If so, in what form and since when has there been such cooperation?
Hvilke produkter og oplysninger udveksles der mellem »Crisis Room« og Schweiz?
What products and information are exchanged between the Crisis Room and Switzerland?
Findes der begrænsninger i de produkter og oplysninger, der må udveksles mellem »Crisis Room« og Schweiz?
Are there restrictions on products and information which may be exchanged between the Crisis Room and Switzerland?
Hvilke begrænsninger er der i givet fald tale om?
If so, what restrictions?
Hvor mange dokumenter og produkter blev der i alt fremsendt fra »Crisis Room« til Schweiz i årene 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 og 2010?
How many documents or products in total were forwarded by the Crisis Room to Switzerland in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010?
Hvor mange klassificerede dokumenter blev der fremsendt fra »Crisis Room« til Schweiz i de nævnte fem år?
How many classified documents were forwarded by the Crisis Room to Switzerland in the above five years?
Hvor mange dokumenter og produkter blev der i alt fremsendt fra Schweiz til »Crisis Room« i årene 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 og 2010?
How many documents or products in total were forwarded by Switzerland to the Crisis Room in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010?
Hvor mange klassificerede dokumenter blev der i de nævnte fem år fremsendt fra Schweiz til »Crisis Room«?
How many classified documents were forwarded by Switzerland to the Crisis Room in the above five years?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8276/2010
Question for written answer E-8276/2010
I forbindelse med svineinfluenzahysteriet indkasserede medicinalkoncerner milliarder på skatteydernes regning.
In connection with the hysteria surrounding swine influenza, pharmaceutical concerns have pocketed billions at taxpayers' expense.
Det grundlæggende problem synes bl.a. at være klassificeringen af pandemier.
The basic problem appears, among other things, to lie with the classification of pandemics.
WHO definerer en pandemi ud fra den hastighed, hvormed en virus spreder sig, uanset sværhedsgraden af den sygdom, der forårsages.
The WHO defines a pandemic according to the speed with which a virus spreads, irrespective of the seriousness of the illness caused.
Desuden findes der, når man påbegynder produktionen af bekæmpelsesmidler, endnu ikke pålidelige oplysninger om sygdomsforløbet.
In addition, when drugs to combat the disease start to be produced there are as yet no reliable data on the course of the disease.
Allerede under tidligere influenzahysterier er antivirale medikamenter som Tamiflu blevet fremhævet massivt i medierne som det eneste mulige helbredende middel, selv om det på nuværende tidspunkt endnu ikke skal være dokumenteret, at Tamiflu forhindrer alvorlige komplikationer eller dødsfald.
Already when hysteria surrounding influenza has broken out in the past, anti-viral medicines such as Tamiflu were massively propagated in the media as the only possible remedy, although, based on current knowledge, it has apparently not been proved that Tamiflu prevents serious complications or deaths.
Også efter at der var blevet rejst tvivl om medikamenternes virkning og influenzaens farlighed samt om behovet for to vaccinationer, blev der alligevel brugt millioner på at opbygge lagre, f.eks. i Tyskland.
After doubts concerning the effectiveness of medicines, the seriousness of the influenza and the need for two vaccination doses had been voiced, millions were nonetheless spent on supplies, for example in Germany.
I året med svineinfluenza skal overskuddet i den schweiziske medicinalgigant Roche være steget til over 10 mia. euro.
In the year of the swine influenza outbreak, the profits of Swiss pharmaceutical multinational Roche apparently rose to more than EUR 10 billion.
Desuden overdrev »eksperterne« i forbindelse med advarslerne, da f.eks. de første skøn fra USA ganske simpelt blev overført til Forbundsrepublikken Tyskland.
Warnings on the part of ‘experts’ were also exaggerated, as, for example, the first available estimates from the USA were simply transposed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Dette øger risikoen for, at advarsler ikke vil blive taget alvorligt i fremtiden.
That increases the risk that in future warnings will no longer be taken seriously.
Hvilke overvejelser gør man sig på EU-niveau for bedre at kunne verificere katastrofeautomatikken, så en harmløs forkølelsesvirus ikke automatisk bliver klassificeret som pandemi, hvorefter de tilsvarende nationale nødplaner begynder at rulle?
What steps are being considered at EU level in order to more effectively verify the automatic development of a catastrophe, in order that a harmless cold virus is not automatically classified as a pandemic, resulting in corresponding national emergency plans starting to be implemented?
Følger man på EU-niveau forløbet af virale infektioner, som spreder sig over et stort område, og giver man eller planlægger man at give EU-anbefalinger om lagerføring i denne forbindelse?
To what extent is the progress of viral infections that spread widely being monitored at EU level, and are EU recommendations on the holding of stocks being given, or planned, in this connection?
Foretages der evalueringer for at få mere pålidelige tal, som er tilpasset europæiske forhold, i forbindelse med mistanke om en pandemi?
Is an assessment being made of how more reliable figures adapted to European conditions could be obtained if a pandemic is suspected?
Findes der planer for at mindske lignede hysterier i fremtiden, som spredes i hele EU gennem medierne (»dræbervirus« og »skrækvirus«)?
Are there plans in future to reduce hysteria of this kind spread throughout the EU by the media (reports of ‘killer pathogens’ and ‘horror virus’)?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8277/2010
Question for written answer E-8277/2010
Om: Manipulation af markedet med børstips
Subject: Market manipulation involving stock market tips
Det lykkedes for nylig politiet at slå til mod en kriminel gruppe fra Østrig og Tyskland, som ved hjælp af aktietips, børsbreve med anbefalinger til aktiekøb, fingerede firmasider på internettet og på onlinefora målrettet havde presset kursen på aktier i værdiløse firmaer, såkaldte pennystocks, i vejret.
The authorities recently dealt a successful blow to a criminal group from Austria and Germany which deliberately drove up prices through share tips, stock market circulars including recommendations to purchase shares, fake Internet corporate websites and shares of valueless companies on online fora, or so-called penny stocks.
Efter kursstigningen blev aktierne solgt, priserne faldt igen, og køberne mistede deres investering.
After prices had risen, the shares were sold, prices fell again and buyers lost their investment.
I et vist omfang skal papirer være blevet omdøbt og handlet i fri handel på børsen i Frankfurt.
Sometimes paper was apparently renamed and traded in over-the-counter trade on the Frankfurt stock market.
Der skal også være blevet manipuleret med »seriøse aktier« ved hjælp af usande oplysninger, f.eks. beskyldninger om manipulation med regnskabet, for at presse kursen ned.
‘Serious shares’ were also apparently manipulated by means of false reports, for example criticism of balance sheet manipulation, in order to lower prices.
Hvilke foranstaltninger udstedes der på EU-niveau for generelt at øge internetsikkerheden?
What measures are being taken at EU level in order to generally improve Internet security?
Findes der et samarbejde med udbydere af store fora og deres omgivelser for at advare mod sådanne metoder?
Is there cooperation with providers of major fora and their associates, in order to warn against such wheeling and dealing?
Er onlinebørstips allerede forbudt i EU, eller planlægger man en ordning, som forbyder disse f.eks. på onlinefora?
Are online share tips already prohibited within the EU or are rules planned which will ban these, for example on online fora?
Hvis der findes sådanne regler, hvordan kontrollerer man da, at de overholdes?
If such rules exist, what checks are being made to ensure that they are complied with?
Hvad gør man for at forhindre sådanne manipulationer i den uregulerede frie handel?
What is being done to prevent manipulation of this kind in unregulated over-the-counter trade?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8278/2010
Question for written answer E-8278/2010
På grund af klimaforandringerne bliver overlevelseschancerne for mange arter og økosystemer stadig dårligere.
As a result of climate change, for many species and ecosystems the chances of survival are increasingly deteriorating.
Man taler derfor om relokalisering f.eks. i forbindelse med geodorum i det sydvestlige Kina eller den sjældne muldvarpeart pyrenæisk desman.
Relocation is therefore being discussed, for example in the case of the Geodorum in south‑western China or the rare hedgehog species, the Pyrenean Desman.
Tidligere har forsøg med flytning haft uforudsigelige konsekvenser (f.eks. i forbindelse med kaniner og tudser i Australien, eller da udsætning af rejer i en sø i Montana førte til, at disse i stedet for at fungere som føde for laks blev en foderkonkurrent til laksen).
In the past, attempts to relocate had unforeseeable consequences (e.g. in the case of rabbits and toads in Australia or when the introduction of shrimps into a lake in Montana led to these becoming rivals to salmon for food instead of serving as salmon food).
Påtænker man også relokaliseringer i forbindelse med EU's biodiversitetsstrategi?
Is relocation being considered in the context of the EU biodiversity strategy?
I bekræftende fald for hvilke tilfælde?
If so, in what cases?
I benægtende fald med hvilken begrundelse?
If not, for reasons?
Hvilke projekter gennemføres aktuelt på EU-niveau for at beskytte truede plante- og dyrearter?
What projects are currently being carried out at EU level to protect threatened plant and animal species?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8279/2010
Question for written answer E-8279/2010
Om: Handicappedes ret til et uafhængigt liv
Subject: The right of persons with disabilities to an independent life
Som ligestillede borgere har handicappede enhver ret til værdighed, til ligebehandling, til et uafhængigt liv og til en fuldstændig deltagelse i samfundet.
As citizens in the full sense of the term, persons with disabilities have an absolute right to enjoy human dignity, equal treatment and an independent life and to be fully involved in society.