natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det fremgår, at EASA ønsker at gøre den nuværende ordning strammere og således mindre fleksibel.
EASA evidently wishes to make the existing rules stricter and thus less flexible.
Nogle meldinger fra området er følgende: den maksimale »Flight Duty Period« (FDP) nedsættes fra 11 til 10 timer, der tillades ingen forlængelse af FDP'en, hvile til personalet om bord i stole på økonomiklasse forbydes, og hvile til personalet skal som minimum omfatte en nat på destinationen (mellem kl. 22.00 og 10.00).
It is rumoured for example that the Maximum Flight Duty Period (FDP) is to be reduced from 11 hours to 10, no extension of the FDP will be permitted, it will be forbidden for crew to rest on board in economy class seats, and crew's rest will at the minimum have to include a night at a location (between 22.00 and 10.00).
Hvis disse bestemmelser indføres, vil det få store konsekvenser for den europæiske luftfartsindustri.
If these rules are introduced, they will have significant consequences for the European aviation industry.
Så skal der betydeligt mere personale med på turene, og der skal oftere foretages mellemlandinger for at tage nyt personale ombord.
Considerably more crew will have to travel on flights and it will be necessary to land more frequently in order for new crew to board.
Er Kommissionen enig i, at der ikke ligger nogen som helst sikkerhedsmæssig underbygning baseret på fakta til grund for ovennævnte meldinger?
Does the Commission agree that there are no safety arguments based on sound statistics which could justify the changes which are rumoured?
Er Kommissionen enig i, at indførelsen af disse regler vil medføre en uforholdsmæssig omkostningspost for de europæiske luftfartsselskaber, mens der på det sikkerhedsmæssige område ikke tilføres nogen som helst merværdi?
Does the Commission agree that the introduction of these rules would entail disproportionate cost for European airlines while conferring no safety benefits?
Er Kommissionen enig i, at disse regler ikke bidrager positivt til den aktuelle klimadebat?
Does the Commission agree that these rules would make no contribution to the current debate on climate?
Erkender Kommissionen, at disse strammere regler medfører en konkurrenceforvridende situation for europæiske luftfartsselskaber i forhold til luftfartsselskaber uden for EU?
Does the Commission recognise that these stricter rules would distort competition between European airlines and airlines based elsewhere?
Hvis ja, hvad agter Kommissionen da at foretage sig på dette punkt?
If so, what action will the Commission take in this context?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0531/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0531/09
Om: Europæiske energiselskabers fortjeneste via gratis tildeling af CO 2 -emissionsrettigheder
Subject: Profits for European energy companies from CO 2 emission rights granted to them free of charge
Den 21. januar 2009 meddeltes det, at den belgiske erhvervsminister, Vincent Van Quickenborne, ikke vil acceptere energiselskabet Electrabels såkaldte »windfall profits«.
On 21 January 2009, it was announced that the Belgian Minister of Enterprise, Vincent Van Quickenborne, was not prepared to tolerate the windfall profits of energy company Electrabel.
Ved at medregne de gratis tildelte CO 2 -emissionsrettigheder i priserne til kunderne — borgere og virksomheder — i perioden 2005-2007 fik Electrabel en fortjeneste på mindst 1,217 mia. EUR.
By including in the prices charged to customers — members of the public and businesses — a charge for CO 2 emission rights which it had obtained free of charge, Electrabel made the enormous profit of EUR 1.217 billion in 2005‑07.
Van Quickenborne mener, at gratis rettigheder ikke skal medregnes, da det presser i forvejen høje energipriser endnu højere op.
Van Quickenborne says that it is not permissible to charge customers for rights which have been obtained free of charge, because this drives up further the already high price of energy.
Det belgiske jernbaneselskab NMBS har taget retlige skridt til at kræve 25 mio. EUR tilbagebetalt fra Electrabel.
The Belgian railway company NMBS/SNCB is taking legal action to secure from Electrabel a refund of EUR 25 million in excess payments for energy.
I henstillingen fra den belgiske energiregulator CREG stiller man storforbrugere som NMBS lige.
The opinion of the Belgian energy regulator CREG states that large energy users such as the Belgian railway company are right about this.
Den belgiske klima- og energiminister, Paul Magnette, har bedt CREG om en detaljeret plan for inddrivelse af de for meget indbetalte beløb.
Belgium's Minister for Climate and Energy, Paul Magnette, has asked CREG for a detailed plan for recovering the excess payments.
CREG har allerede foreslået at kræve energiproducenternes windfall profits tilbage via en særlig afgift.
CREG has already proposed that energy producers' windfall profits be recovered by means of a special tax.
Spørgsmålet om windfall profits spiller ikke kun en rolle i Belgien, men også i andre medlemsstater.
The issue of windfall profits is relevant not only in Belgium but in other Member States as well.
Kan Kommissionen give en oversigt over de samlede windfall profits, som energiselskaberne i EU har haft ved medregning af CO 2 -rettigheder?
Can the Commission provide an overview of the total windfall profits which energy companies in the EU have made by charging for CO 2 emission rights?
En af fordelene ved at skabe et åbent energimarked er, at der på europæisk plan skabes lige vilkår for energiselskaberne og erhvervslivet samt forbrugerne.
One of the advantages of creating an open energy market is that it creates a level playing field throughout Europe for energy companies, industry and consumers.
Da det ser ud som om, visse medlemsstater altså skal betale ekstra for deres energi som følge af medregningen af CO 2 -emissionsrettigheder, hvad gør Kommissionen så for at sørge for, at der ikke er en stor ulighed med hensyn til adgangen til energi for det europæiske erhvervsliv?
If it becomes clear that businesses in some Member States do after all have to pay more for their energy because they are being charged for CO 2 emission rights, what will the Commission do to ensure that no major inequality exists in access to energy for European businesses?
Den europæiske lovgivning om handel med CO 2 -rettigheder (ETS) har begrænset muligheden for at handle med rettigheder til 2012 og dermed muliggjort problemet med windfall profits.
European law on the auctioning of CO 2 emission rights (ETS) has limited the possibility of auctioning rights to 2012, which has helped to make the problem of windfall profits possible.
Hvad vil og kan Kommissionen gøre for at rette op på denne skade for virksomhederne og forbrugerne?
How will and can the Commission undo this damage to businesses and consumers?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0532/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0532/09
Om: Menneskerettighedssituationen på Cuba
Subject: Human rights situation in Cuba
Hvordan forsvarer Kommissionen genoptagelsen af samarbejdet mellem EU og Cubas kommunistiske diktatur set i lyset af de massive arrestationer af politiske afvigere, mennesker, der blot ønskede at tage til Havanna for at deltage i en demonstration til fejring af 60-årsdagen for verdenserklæringen om menneskerettighederne?
How does the Commission justify the resumption of cooperation between the EU and the Communist dictatorship in Cuba in the light of the recent mass arrests of political dissidents, people who simply wished to visit Havana in order to take part in a demonstration to mark the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0533/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0533/09
Om: Støtte til landmændene
Subject: Support for farmers
I betragtning af de konstante påmindelser fra landmænd og deres organisationer om utilstrækkeligheden af støtten fra PRODER — landdistriktsudviklingsprogrammet 2007-2013, navnlig hvad angår de miljøvenlige landbrugstiltag og de strategiske produktionsgrene, bedes Kommissionen oplyse følgende: 1.
In the light of the repeated complaints from farmers and their associations over the insufficiency of the aids provided for under the Rural Development Programme 2007‑13 (RDP), in particular with regard to agri-environmental measures and the strategic sectors: 1.
Er det muligt at genbehandle, ændre og omprogrammere PRODER for at tage hensyn til de berettigede anmodninger fra de portugisiske landmænd og forholdene i landet? 2.
Does the Commission consider it possible to review, alter and reprogramme the RDP in order to meet the legitimate concerns of Portuguese farmers and reflect actual national circumstances? 2.
Hvor høj er den finansielle gennemførelsesgrad af PRODER?
Can the Commission provide information on the degree of financial execution of the RDP?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0534/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0534/09
af Rareş-Lucian Niculescu (PPE-DE) og Alexandru Nazare (PPE-DE)
by Rareş-Lucian Niculescu (PPE‑DE) and Alexandru Nazare (PPE‑DE)
Om: Handelsforbindelser med USA
Subject: Commercial relations with the United States
Det amerikanske handelsministerium meddelte i sidste uge, at det har besluttet at tredoble toldafgifterne på en række EU-produkter, der pålægges tillægstold, som svar på EU's afvisning af at importere hormonfyldt amerikansk oksekød.
Last week the US Department of Commerce announced its decision to triple customs duties on a list of EU products which are subject to additional customs duties in response to the European Union's refusal to import American beef which contains hormones.
USA har ligeledes meddelt, at landet agter at klage over EU ved Verdenshandelsorganisationen (WTO) med henblik på at opnå tilladelse til at markedsføre fjerkræ, der er desinficeret med klor, på det europæiske marked.
The United States has also announced its intention of lodging a complaint against the European Union with the WTO, with a view to securing authorisation to market poultry disinfected with chlorine on the European market.
Kommissionen bedes kommentere USA's tiltag.
Could the Commission comment on these moves by the United States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0535/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0535/09
Om: Barnets ret til en sund opvækst
Subject: Children's right to a healthy upbringing
Børne-tv-kanalen Minimax, der har sendetilladelse i Den Tjekkiske Republik, sender dagligt fra kl. 12.00 serien Povesti din folclorul maghiar (eventyr om magyarisk folklore).
Every Thursday at 12 noon, the children's television channel Minimax, licensed in the Czech Republic, broadcasts a programme called ‘Tales from Hungarian Folklore’.
Idet denne tv-stations sendetilladelse er udstedt i Tjekkiet, kan det rumænske audiovisuelle råd imidlertid ikke iværksætte sanktioner.
Since the channel is licensed in the Czech Republic, it is not possible for the Romanian Council for Audiovisual Media to apply any sanctions.
Rumænien befandt sig i en lignende situation i 2008, hvor tv-stationen AXN, der har sendetilladelse i Storbritannien, overtrådte den rumænske lovgivning ved at sende tegnefilm i børnenes sendetid, hvor nogle egern begik selvmord, og et overjordisk væsen indlod sig på seksuelle aktiviteter.
A similar situation occurred in Romania in 2008, when the channel AXN, licensed in the UK, put itself in breach of Romanian law by broadcasting. during children's viewing hours, cartoons representing suicidal squirrels and an extraterrestrial engaging in sexual activity.
I betragtning af at et audiovisuelt program, som en station har tilladelse til at udsende i en medlemsstat, ikke kan afvises i en anden medlemsstat, og at der i direktivet om audiovisuelle medietjenester, der blev vedtaget i december 2007, stilles krav om udvikling af kodekser, der sikrer, at mindreårige ikke får adgang til indhold, som kan skade deres udvikling, hvilke lovgivningsmæssige foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen da at træffe for at undgå, at en sådan situation opstår i fremtiden?
Given that an audiovisual programme accepted for broadcasting in a Member State cannot be refused by another, while the EU directive of December 2007 on audiovisual services and mass media makes it mandatory to introduce access codes so as to prevent children from viewing content which could affect their development, what legislative measures will the Commission propose with a view to ensuring that cases such as the above do not occur in future?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0537/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0537/09
Om: Befordring af bevægelseshæmmede med bus i henhold til direktiv 2001/85/EF
Subject: Transport of people with reduced mobility by bus, application of Directive 2001/85/EC
På baggrund af de gældende bestemmelser, der regulerer befordringen af bevægelseshæmmede passagerer, kan det fastslås, at de er indført for at regulere de almindelige tjenester, og det er logisk, at når der på en rute er to kørestolsbrugere, skal en af dem kunne komme af køretøjet uden at genere den anden, hvorfor der i køretøjet bør være tilstrækkeligt med plads.
The current legislation governing the transport by road of passengers with reduced mobility was designed to regulate regular services, since it is clear that, where two passengers in wheelchairs are travelling on a given route, either of them should be able to alight without disturbing the other.
I forbindelse med lejlighedsvis personbefordring vil det førnævnte eksempel ikke forekomme, eftersom alle passagerer skal til samme bestemmelsessted.
This means that there must be sufficient room for manoeuvre inside the vehicle.
På tilbageturen skal det organiseres således, at de brugere, der først stiger på, skal sidst af.
This situation cannot occur on occasional services, since all the passengers are travelling to the same destination, and on their return access is organised in such a way as to ensure that the first people to board the coach are those who will be the last to leave it.
I Spaniens tilfælde skal de kompetente offentlige administrationer, dvs. de selvstyrende regioner, kommuner og andre organer, afholde omkostningerne i forbindelse med denne form for personbefordring.
In the case of Spain, the costs of providing this type of transport service are borne by the competent public administrations, i.e. the autonomous communities, local councils and other bodies.
Derfor vil de nye betingelser i henhold til bestemmelserne have en negativ indvirkning på finansieringen af denne tjeneste, da omkostningerne vil stige.
The new conditions laid down by the directive will therefore have an adverse effect on the funding of this service, since costs will rise.
Det bør samtidig nævnes, at de private centre og organisationer, der arbejder med handicappede, ikke kan bære den økonomiske byrde, hvad angår øgede transportomkostninger.
It should also be borne in mind that private centres and associations working with disabled people will not be able to bear the economic burden arising from the increase in transport costs.
Agter Kommissionen på denne baggrund at ændre eller tilpasse direktiv 2001/85/EF, navnlig bilag VII om krav til tekniske hjælpemidler, der letter adgangsforholdene for bevægelseshæmmede?
In the light of this situation, does the Commission have any plans to amend or adapt Directive 2001/85/EC, in particular Annex VII thereof on the requirements for technical devices facilitating access for passengers with reduced mobility?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0538/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0538/09
Om: Overtrædelser af Fællesskabets miljølovgivning i Ponteareas (Galicien, Spanien)
Subject: Violations of European Community environmental legislation in Ponteareas (Galicia, Spain)
En række undersøgelser foretaget af miljøorganisationer i Galicien har påvist overtrædelser og manglende overholdelse af miljøbestemmelser fra Spaniens side, og de fastslår, at tonen de seneste år især har været præget af de mange negative miljømæssige udtalelser fra de galiciske myndigheder og manglen på gennemsigtighed, hvad angår anvendelsen af EU-midler på miljøområdet.
Many studies by environmental groups in Galicia have drawn attention to the violations of environmental law that have occurred there, pointing out that recent years have been marked by the number of negative environmental statements drawn up by the Galician administration and the lack of transparency as regards the use of European environmental funds.
Det selvstyrende organ til forsvar og beskyttelse af miljøet, Consellería de Medio Ambiente de la Xunta de Galicia, har ikke været i stand til at sikre beskyttelsen og bevarelsen af de mest fremtrædende naturressourcer, herunder områder underlagt Natura 2000-nettet.
The autonomous body responsible for environmental protection and conservation, the Environment Department of the Galician Government, does not appear to have been capable of carrying out the necessary work to protect and conserve the most notable natural resources, including certain sites listed in the Natura 2000 network.
Et af disse områder er floden Tea i Ponteareas (Pontevedra, Galicien).
One of these is the area surrounding the River Tea in Ponteareas (Pontevedra, Galicia), along the banks of which urban wastewater is discharged both continuously and occasionally, even though those banks are included in the Natura 2000 network.
Floden er omfattet af Natura 2000-nettet, og i dens flodmunding udledes der fortsat og med jævne mellemrum byspildevand gennem en kanal, hvor vandet udledes uden nogen form for kontrol, hvilket resulterer i alvorlige konsekvenser for flodens økosystem.
One outlet discharges water without any controls at all, with serious consequences for the river's ecosystem.
Den 30. september 2008 meddelte Kommissionen i sit svar på skriftlig forespørgsel E-3606/08 af Meyer Pleite, at den havde indledt en overtrædelsesprocedure mod Spanien på grund af manglende overholdelse af bestemmelserne i direktiv 91/271/EØF EFT L 135 af 30.5.1991, s. 40 . om rensning af byspildevand.
On 30 September 2008 the Commission announced, in reply to Written Question E‑3606/08 by Willy Meyer Pleite, that infringement proceedings had been opened against Spain on the grounds that it had not met the deadline set by Directive 91/271/EEC OJ L 135, 30.5.1991, p.
Da Ponteareas er underlagt direktivets anvendelsesområde, skal kapaciteten af anlægget til behandling af spildevand være proportional med omfanget af spildevand, der skal behandles.
40. concerning urban wastewater treatment, given that Ponteareas falls within the scope of that directive, according to which the capacity of wastewater treatment facilities have to keep pace with the mass of urban wastewater to be treated.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om de spanske myndigheder har fremsendt de nødvendige oplysninger vedrørende opførelse af et nyt anlæg til rensning af spildevand i Ponteareas?
Can the Commission say whether the Spanish authorities have forwarded the required information on the construction of a new wastewater treatment plant for Ponteareas?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0539/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0539/09
Om: Fortsat forurening af O Burgo-flodmundingen i A Coruña (Galicien, Spanien)
Subject: Continuing pollution of the O Burgo estuary in A Coruña (Galicia, Spain)
O Burgo-flodmundingen i A Coruña (Galicien, Spanien) er fortsat præget af en forureningsgrad, der ligger over den fastsatte grænse i henhold til Fællesskabets miljølovgivning.
The O Burgo estuary in A Coruña (Galicia, Spain) still carries a level of pollution that exceeds the limits set by Community environmental legislation and affects marine biodiversity.
De seneste udledninger blev registreret i begyndelsen af januar i år.
The most recent discharges were recorded at the start of January 2009.
En række miljøorganisationer, politiske grupper og foreninger for fisk og skaldyr i området har adskillige gange påtalt de mere en 80 rør, der udleder spildevand direkte i havet.
Various environmental groups, political organisations and fishermen's and shellfish harvesters' associations in the area have repeatedly protested at the existence of more than 80 pipes that discharge waste directly into the estuary, which is rich in marine resources.
Kommissionen har flere gange modtaget oplysninger om denne alvorlige situation.
The Commission has already been notified of this serious situation through various channels.
Mener Kommissionen, at forureningen, som påvirker den galiciske flodmunding og er i strid med den europæiske miljølovgivning, hvad angår vandkvalitet, fremover kan sikres og reduceres?
Does it believe that the pollution levels found in this Galician estuary, which are in breach of Community legislation on water quality, will be reduced so that compliance is guaranteed?
Har Kommissionen modtaget oplysninger fra de kompetente spanske myndigheder om foranstaltninger til overholdelse af Fællesskabets kvalitetsbestemmelser samt mindskelse af den nuværende forurening?
Has the Commission received any information from the competent Spanish authorities regarding the plans envisaged in order to comply with the obligation to guarantee Community quality standards and reduce the current pollution?
Agter Kommissionen at indlede en overtrædelsesprocedure mod Spanien på grund af manglende overholdelse af fællesskabsbestemmelserne på området?
Will the Commission open infringement proceedings against Spain for failure to comply with applicable Community legislation?
Har Kommissionen kendskab til, at den spanske regering har oprettet en budgetpost til gennemførelse af en plan, som skulle mindske forureningen, hindre nye former for forurening og fremme en større miljømæssig kontrol af det berørte område samt rense den galiciske flodmunding, og at planen skulle være gennemført for nogle år siden, men endnu ikke er indledt?
Is it aware that the Spanish Government has a budget heading for the implementation of a plan to reduce pollution that would have prevented the emergence of new sources of pollution and ensured greater environmental controls in the area affected and the rehabilitation of this Galician estuary, a plan which should have been implemented in previous years and has still not been set in motion?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0540/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0540/09
Om: David Cernys brug af andre kunstnere til Entropa
Subject: David Černý's use of other artists' names in ‘Entropa’
Den tjekkiske kunstner David Cerny har lavet det meget omtalte kunstværk Entropa og har dermed formået at skabe debat over hele Europa.
The Czech artist David Černý has created the very controversial work entitled ‘Entropa’ and thus succeeded in sparking a debate throughout Europe.
Kunstværket er spændende og provokerende og giver mulighed for at være humoristisk i forhold til medlemslandenes respektive nationale selvforståelser.
The work is exciting and provocative and makes it possible to approach the Member States’ national self-images in a humorous way.
Det signalerer, at vi i EU ikke lægger begrænsninger på kunsten.
This sends the message that we in the EU do not impose any limitations on art.
Desværre har David Cerny misbrugt en række kunstneres navne, bl.a. den danske kunstner Susan Malberg Albertsen.
Unfortunately, David Černý has taken the names of several artists in vain, including the Danish artist Susan Malberg Albertsen.
Hun skulle ifølge David Cerny være bidragyder fra Danmark, men dette er ikke tilfældet.
She was alleged by David Černý to be the contributor from Denmark, but this was not the case.
Susan Malberg Albertsen har ikke bidraget til kunstværket og har slet ikke været i kontakt med David Cerny på noget tidspunkt.
Susan Malberg Albertsen did not contribute to this art work and has not been in contact with David Černý at any point.
Hvad vil formandskabet gøre for at sikre, at Susan Malberg Albertsen og andre kunstnere, som uretmæssigt er nævnt som bidragydere til Entropa, fremover ikke sættes i forbindelse med kunstværket?
What does the Presidency propose to do to ensure that the names of Susan Malberg Albertsen and of other artists who were misleadingly named as contributors to Entropa, are not linked to this art work in future?
Kan formandskabet oplyse, om denne uretmæssige nævnelse af kunstnernavne vil få økonomiske konsekvenser for David Cerny?
Can the Presidency state whether the misleading naming of artists’ names will have any financial consequences for David Černý?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0541/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0541/09