natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Agter den at tage yderligere skridt til bekæmpelse af narkotika i Afghanistan og især til bekæmpelse af distributionskanalerne? 2.
Does the Commission intend to take further action to combat drugs in Afghanistan and in particular seeks to dismantle supply channels? 2.
Er den enig i, at Taliban-styrkerne aldrig vil kunne nedkæmpes, hvis dette store samfundsproblem ikke løses, da den ulovlige handel med narkotika er den største kilde til finansiering af disse styrker?
Does it agree that, without a definitive solution to this major social problem, it will never be possible effectively to combat the Taliban, given that illegal drugs trafficking is its principal source of funding?
Mener den, at der bør indledes en dialog for at få indført en klausul i forbindelse med EU's udviklingsbistand, således at Afghanistan forpligtes til at bekæmpe produktion og handel med narkotika? 3.
Does it consider it necessary to discuss the possibility of introducing a provision linking EU development aid with a commitment by Afghanistan to combat drugs production and trafficking? 3.
Hvilke initiativer agter den at træffe for at nedbringe antallet af mennesker, der er afhængige af narkotika, og for at sikre dem lægehjælp?
What measures will it take to reduce the number of drug addicts and provide them with medical treatment?
Agter den at finansiere programmer til oprettelse af afvænningscentre i landet, især i de provinser, hvor der ikke er adgang til lægehjælp?
Does it intend to provide funding for projected rehabilitation centres in Afghanistan, particularly in those areas which do not have access to medical treatment?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5095/2010
Question for written answer E-5095/2010
Om: Modus 4 — den almindelige overenskomst om handel med tjenesteydelser
Subject: Mode 4 — General Agreement on Trade in Services
Kommissionen bedes med hensyn til handelsdrøftelserne mellem EU og Indien og alle handelsaftaler, som er til diskussion i øjeblikket, besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
With regard to the EU/India trade discussions and all trade agreements under discussion could the Commission clarify: 1.
Hvad er den britiske regerings holdning til Modus 4, dvs. personers frie bevægelighed over grænserne med henblik på levering af tjenesteydelser? 2.
The UK Government’s position on Mode 4, i.e. the movement of persons across borders for the purpose of supplying services? 2.
Hvad er den aktuelle status for drøftelserne om Modus 4 mellem EU og Indien? 3.
The current status of discussions on Mode 4 between the EU and India? 3.
Hvad er årsagen til hemmeligholdelsen af disse drøftelser? 4.
The reason for the secrecy in respect of those discussions? 4.
Hvor mange mennesker forventer Kommissionen, at der kommer ind i EU i forbindelse med grænseoverskridende aktiviteter i forbindelse med levering af tjenesteydelser i de første fem år af gennemførelsen af Modus 4? 5.
How many people the Commission expects to enter the EU in connection with cross-border activities for the supply of services in the first five years of implementation of Mode 4? 5.
Massebevægelsen af arbejdskraften over grænserne vil helt sikkert lægge et dystert nedadgående pres på mellem- og højindkomstlønmodtagere i de relevante serviceindustrier.
Clearly, the mass movement of labour across borders will create dire downward pressure on middle- and high-income wage earners in the relevant service industries.
Den vil desuden skabe en væsentlig ny bølge af potentiel indvandring, idet en del af den nye arbejdsstyrke vil søge permanent ophold og omfatte plejekrævende personer.
It will also create a significant new wave of potential immigration, as a proportion of the new workforce will seek permanent entry and the inclusion of dependents.
Er disse negative sociale og arbejdsrelaterede konsekvenser årsag til, at Kommissionen har holdt disse spørgsmål på afstand af den offentlige debat, oplysning og høring?
Are these negative social and labour consequences the reason why the Commission has kept these matters away from the realm of public debate, public information and consultation?
Hvorfor er disse spørgsmål i benægtende fald ikke blevet drøftet og bragt til offentlighedens kendskab? 6.
If not, why are these issues not being debated and brought to the notice of the public? 6.
Har Kommissionen kendskab til, at medlemmer af den amerikanske Kongres er imod Modus 4, som den betragter som et indvandringsspørgsmål snarere end et handelsspørgsmål? 7.
Is the Commission aware that Members of the US Congress have opposed Mode 4, which they view as an immigration issue rather than a trade issue? 7.
Accepterer Kommissionen, at Modus 4 giver selskaber mulighed for at importere billig arbejdskraft og udnytte lønforskellen mellem de udviklede lande og udviklingslandene? 8.
Does the Commission accept that Mode 4 enables corporations to import cheap labour and capitalise on the wage differential between developed and developing countries? 8.
Vil Kommissionen erkende, at regeringerne mister evnen til at føre tilsyn med deres grænser og fastlægge deres indvandringspolitik, når indvandringen af arbejdskraften har rettet sig mod selskaberne? 9.
Will the Commission acknowledge that once migration of labour moves to corporations, then governments lose the ability to oversee their borders and determine immigration policy? 9.
I hvilken udstrækning har den globale forretningsverden udført lobbyarbejde for Modus 4? 10.
To what extent has global business lobbied for Mode 4? 10.
I hvilken udstrækning har Goldman Sachs udført lobbyarbejde for Modus 4? 11.
To what extent has Goldman Sachs lobbied for Mode 4? 11.
Har Goldman Sachs rettet henvendelse til Kommissionen i forbindelse med Modus 4?
What representations has Goldman Sachs made to the Commission in respect of Mode 4?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5096/2010
Question for written answer E-5096/2010
Mesoteliom er en asbestrelateret form for lungekræft, der medfører stort ubehag og smerte.
Mesothelioma is an asbestos-related lung cancer which causes great discomfort and pain.
Mange mennesker i Skotland lider af sygdommen, idet der her har været gjort stort brug af asbest uden forståelse for konsekvenserne.
Many people in Scotland suffer from the disease owing to the fact that widespread use was made of asbestos without the implications being understood.
Trustfonden John MacDougall Mesothelioma Trust i Fife har til formål at støtte ofrene og deres familier samt støtte den medicinske forskning i sygdommen.
The John MacDougall Mesothelioma Trust based in Fife seeks to support victims and their families, and supports medical research into the disease.
Vil Kommissionen øge midlerne til medicinsk forskning i denne frygtelige sygdom?
Will the Commission increase funding for medical research into this terrible disease?
Findes der støtte på EU‑niveau til ofrene og deres familier?
Is there any support at EU level for victims and their families?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5097/2010
Question for written answer E-5097/2010
Kommissionen bedes, i betragtning af at USA via sit trafikministerium anmoder om kommentarer i landet vedrørende fuld og komplet offentliggørelse af gebyrer og kræver, at alle transportører skal gøre al information tilgængelig for forbrugerne via globale distributionssystemer (GDS), oplyse, hvilke fremskridt den gør med hensyn til at undersøge klagen mod IATA vedrørende EU's CRS‑ordninger, og hvornår vi i denne henseende kan forvente handling?
In view of the fact that the USA is asking, via the Department of Transportation, for comments in their own country regarding the full and complete disclosure of fees and is requiring all carriers to make available to all consumers all information available via global distribution systems (GDS), can the Commission indicate what progress it is making in investigating the complaint against IATA in relation to EU CRS regulations and when we can expect some action in this regard?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5101/2010
Question for written answer E-5101/2010
Om: Tyrkiets indblanding i konflikten i Israel
Subject: Interference by Turkey in the conflict in Israel
Tyrkiet har bedyret, at man allerede inden den meget omtalte flotilles udsejling fra havnen i Tyrkiet havde foretaget en kontrol af, hvem og hvad der var om bord, og i den forbindelse havde sikret, at ingen terrorister eller våben var på vej mod Gaza.
Turkey has claimed that, even before the much-discussed flotilla left a Turkish port, a check had already been carried out on who and what was on board, ensuring that no terrorists or arms were heading for Gaza.
Alligevel har omfattende videodokumentation i ugerne efter episoden vist, at båden var fyldt med aggressive og bevæbnede Hamas-sympatisører, som ønskede en konfrontation med Israel og IDF.
However, comprehensive video documentation in the weeks following the incident have shown that the boats were full of aggressive, armed Hamas sympathisers who were seeking a confrontation with Israel and the IDF.
Idet det erindres, at Tyrkiet er kandidatland til EU, hvilke tiltag agter Kommissionen da at iværksætte for at anspore Tyrkiet til en uafhængig undersøgelse af, hvordan det kan finde sted, at den flotille, som for nylig måtte stoppes af israelske soldater, havde Hamas-sympatisører og våben om bord?
Bearing in mind that Turkey is a candidate for membership of the EU, what measures does the Commission propose to take to encourage Turkey to carry out an independent investigation into how it was possible that the flotilla recently arrested by Israeli soldiers had Hamas sympathisers and arms on board?
På baggrund af de dramatiske begivenheder omkring Gaza-flotillen har EU's højtstående repræsentant Catherine Ashton anmodet om en øjeblikkelig, fuldstændig og uvildig undersøgelse af disse begivenheder og omstændighederne i forbindelse hermed.
After the dramatic events surrounding the ‘Gaza Flotilla’ High Representative Catherine Ashton demanded an immediate, full and impartial inquiry into these events and the circumstances related to them.
Catherine Ashton støtter FN's generalsekretær Ban Ki-Moons udtalelse vedrørende en international undersøgelse af begivenheden.
High Representative Ashton supported the announcement by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon of an international inquiry into the flotilla incident.
Idet hun henviste til EU’s vedvarende krav om en fuldstændig, ærlig, uvildig, afbalanceret og gennemsigtig undersøgelse, som opfylder de internationale standarder, udtrykte hun tilfredshed med Israels og Tyrkiets tilslutning til FN's undersøgelse som et positivt skridt henimod en afklaring af sandheden og af, hvad der i virkeligheden skete den 31. maj 2010.
While referring to the EU’s continuous calls for a full, frank, fair, balanced and transparent inquiry which meets international standards, she welcomed Israel’s and Turkey’s commitment to the UN-led inquiry as a positive step towards finding the truth of what really happened on 31 May 2010.
Med hensyn til spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt der var våben om bord på flotillens skibe, finder Kommissionen, at man bør afvente resultaterne af den uvildige undersøgelse.
Regarding the possible presence of arms on board the ships of the flotilla the Commission is of the opinion that the results of such an independent inquiry should be awaited.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5102/2010
Question for written answer E-5102/2010
(7. juli 2010)
(20 July 2010)
Om: Markedsføringsforbud for snustobaksprodukter
Subject: Ban on marketing snuff tobacco products
(23. august 2010)
(23 August 2010)
Markedsføring af tobak til oral indtagelse har været forbudt i EU siden 1992.
The placing on the market of tobacco for oral use has been prohibited in the EU since 1992.
Forbuddet blev indført for at forhindre folk i at begynde at bruge og blive afhængige af nye tobaksprodukter til oral indtagelse og for at sikre et velfungerende indre marked, idet tre medlemsstater allerede havde indført sådanne forbud af hensyn til folkesundheden.
The rationale behind this was to prevent people from starting to use and from becoming addicted to new oral tobacco products and to ensure the functioning of the internal market since three Member States had already adopted such bans on public health grounds.
Sverige fik en permanent undtagelse fra forbuddet i akten vedrørende landets tiltrædelse.
Sweden was granted a permanent derogation from the ban in its Act of Accession.
Undtagelsen var betinget af, at Sverige træffer alle nødvendige foranstaltninger for at sikre, at tobak til oral indtagelse (snus) ikke markedsføres i andre medlemsstater.
The derogation was granted on the condition that Sweden shall take all the necessary measures to ensure that tobacco for oral use (‘snus’) is not placed on the market in other Member States.
Danmark har aldrig fået en sådan undtagelse, og derfor gælder forbuddet mod tobak til oral indtagelse fuldt ud i Danmark.
Denmark was never granted such derogation and therefore the ban of tobacco for oral use fully applies to Denmark.
Der er endnu ikke truffet afgørelse om omfanget og arten af denne revision.
At this stage, no decision has yet been made on the scope and nature of this revision.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5103/2010
Question for written answer E-5103/2010
Om: Illegitimt indsat »administrerende generaldirektør« i OLAF
Subject: OLAF's improperly appointed ‘acting director-general’
Den 20. maj 2010 afholdtes der fra kl. 15.00 til 16.30 en for alle OLAF-medarbejdere tilgængelig drøftelse af Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) i form af en »meningsudveksling om ledelsen i overgangsperioden« uden en ordinært indsat generaldirektør.
Between 15.00 and 16.30 on 20 May 2010 an internal meeting was held for all the staff of OLAF (the European Anti-Fraud Office) — in the absence of a properly appointed director-general — for the purpose of ‘exchanging views on management during the transition period’.
Foran flere hundrede medarbejdere udtalte den administrerende direktør sig også om spørgsmålet om hans legitimitet, der er omstridt af Parlamentet.
The acting director-general addressed several hundred members of staff on issues including the legitimacy of his own appointment, which Parliament disputes.
I denne forbindelse udtalte han, at medlemmerne af Europa-Parlamentet tydeligvis ikke har den intellektuelle indsigt til at kunne forstå Kommissionens juridiske tjeneste og hans holdning, der drages i tvivl af Parlamentet i dets egen retserklæring.
He explained that the MEPs clearly lacked the intellectual capacity to understand the Commission’s Legal Service or its opinion, which Parliament is contesting on the basis of its own legal advice.
Mener Kommissionen, at sådanne udtalelser i egen sag er korrekte?
Does the Commission consider such utterances, on a matter of personal concern to the speaker, to be proper?
Mener Kommissionen, at sådanne vurderinger og provokationer af Europa-Parlamentet er den rigtige omgang institutionerne imellem?
Does the Commission think that making judgmental and provocative comments of this kind about Parliament is the right way to conduct interinstitutional relations?
Hvor store var omkostningerne til denne tjenesteligt anordnede arbejdspause om eftermiddagen?
What were the costs of this officially organised afternoon break?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5104/2010
Question for written answer E-5104/2010
Ioannis A. Tsoukalas (PPE) og Georgios Papanikolaou (PPE)
Ioannis A. Tsoukalas (PPE) and Georgios Papanikolaou (PPE)
Om: Bekæmpelse af ulovlig menneskehandel i Albanien
Subject: Fight against trafficking in human beings in Albania
I anledning af højtideligholdelsen af verdensflygtningedagen (den 20. juni 2010) offentliggjordes USA's Udenrigsministerium en årsrapport om illegal menneskehandel i verden.Rapporten omhandler bla.a.
The US State Department annual report on trafficking in human beings at world level was released to mark World Refugee Day on 20 June 2010.
Albanien, der er et af oprindelses- og transitlandene for menneskesmugling, særligt kvinder og børn, der dernæst fordeles i EU.
The report deals specifically with the case of Albania, a country of origin and transit for trafficking in people, particularly women and children, who are then channelled into the EU.
Selv om regeringen gør store anstrengelser for at bekæmpe den illegale udvandring, bør der iværksættes endnu flere aktiviteter (såsom f.eks. beskyttelse af personer, der anmelder menneskehandlere, tilstrækkelig oplysning om forvaltningen af asyl- og immigrationssystemet og styrkelse af samarbejdet med nabolandene), så antallet af personer, der bliver ofre for udnyttelse enten i selve Albanien eller i nabolandene (Grækenland, Rumænien, Italien og det øvrige Vesteuropa), hvortil de føres, mindskes.
Even though the Albanian government is making significant efforts to combat illegal immigration, further steps still need to be taken in a range of fields (e.g. protection for people reporting traffickers, sufficient data in relation to the system for managing asylum and immigration, increased cooperation with neighbouring countries) in order to reduce the number of victims of exploitation, both in Albania and in neighbouring countries to which they are sent (Greece, Romania, Italy and other western European countries).
Hvordan vurderer den den albanske regerings samarbejde med Frontex?
How does it assess cooperation between the Albanian government and Frontex?
Hvad agter den yderligere at foretage for gøre sikringen af de europæiske grænser mere effektiv og for at bekæmpe den ulovlige menneskehandel fra Albanien til EU's territorium, idet 34 % af opsporingerne af illegale immigranter i henhold til Frontex' oplysninger for 2009 fandt sted ved Grækenlands grænser ved Albanien og FYROM?
What additional steps will it take to ensure that European borders are protected more effectively and to combat illegal movements of people from Albania into EU territory, given that, according to Frontex data for 2009, 34 % of illegal crossings into the EU take place at Greece's borders with Albania and Fyrom?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5105/2010
Question for written answer E-5105/2010
Andrey Kovatchev (PPE) , László Tőkés (PPE) , Milan Zver (PPE) og Cristian Dan Preda (PPE)
Andrey Kovatchev (PPE) , László Tőkés (PPE) , Milan Zver (PPE) and Cristian Dan Preda (PPE)
Om: Arkiverne for den tidligere jugoslaviske kommunistiske efterretningstjeneste UDBA
Subject: The archives of the former Yugoslav communist secret service UDBA
Ifølge undervisningscentret for national forsoning i Slovenien befinder arkiverne over aktiviteterne i den tidligere jugoslaviske totalitære kommunistiske efterretningstjeneste i Slovenien, UDBA, sig nu i Serbien.
According to the Study Centre for National Reconciliation in Slovenia, the archives of the activities of the former Yugoslav totalitarian communist secret service in Slovenia, the UDBA, are now in Serbia.
Borgerne i EU‑medlemsstaten Slovenien har ikke adgang til disse arkiver, der omhandler deres fortid under det jugoslaviske totalitære kommunistiske regime.
The citizens of Slovenia, an EU Member State, did not have the right of access to these archives related to their past during the Yugoslav totalitarian communist regime.
Disse arkiver befinder sig nu i et andet land, nemlig Republikken Serbien, der officielt ansøgte om EU‑medlemskab den 22. december 2009.
These archives are now in another country, namely the Republic of Serbia, which officially applied for EU membership on 22 December 2009.
Regeringen i Republikken Slovenien har gentagne gange anmodet regeringen i Republikken Serbien om at give de slovenske borgere adgang til disse arkiver, men dette er ikke taget til følge.
The Government of the Republic of Slovenia has asked the Government of the Republic of Serbia several times to provide the Slovenian citizens with access to these archives, but this has not happened.
Situationen er den samme for borgere i andre tidligere jugoslaviske republikker, hvis borgere ikke har adgang til UDBA's arkiver.
The situation is the same for the citizens of other former Yugoslav republics, whose citizens do not have access to the archives of the UDBA.
Endvidere har selv borgerne i Republikken Serbien ikke adgang til UDBA's arkiver.
Furthermore — the citizens of the Republic of Serbia do not themselves have access to the archives of the UDBA.
Regeringen i Republikken Serbien forbereder landet til EU‑tiltrædelse.
The Government of the Republic of Serbia is preparing its country for EU accession.
Dette betyder, at retten til fri adgang til oplysninger for landets borgere og borgere i alle EU‑medlemsstater skal respekteres af den serbiske regering.
This means that the right of free access to information by the citizens of that country and citizens of all EU Member States must be respected by the Serbian Government.
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe for kraftigt at opfordre Republikken Serbien til at åbne UDBA's arkiver med henblik på at tillade adgang for borgere i Serbien, borgere i alle EU‑medlemsstater og borgere i tidligere jugoslaviske republikker, som ikke er EU‑medlemsstater?
What measures will the Commission undertake to urge the Government of the Republic of Serbia to open the archives of the UDBA in order to allow for access by the citizens of Serbia, the citizens of all EU Member States, as well as the citizens of former Yugoslav republics which are not EU Member States?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5106/2010
Question for written answer E-5106/2010
Om: Enkeltbetaling pr. bedrift
Subject: Single Farm Payment
Den walisiske regering (Welsh Assembly Government) tillader ikke, at landmænd fremsætter mere end ét krav pr. jordlod, og udelukker derfor mange landmænd fra nødvendig finansiering under den fælles landbrugspolitik.
The Welsh Assembly Government (WAG) is not allowing farmers to make more than one claim on any particular parcel of land, thus denying many farmers the necessary CAP funding.
Den walisiske regering er opmærksom på dette problem, men hævder, at hvis den fortsætter med at tillade landmænd at fremsætte mere end et krav, ville EU trække finansieringen tilbage på grund af manglende overensstemmelse med EU‑lovgivningen.
The WAG is aware of this issue but claims that if it continues to allow farmers to make more than one claim funding would be taken back by the EU due to non-compliance with EU legislation.
Da dette problem med »dobbeltkrav« har berørt en stor del af landmændene i Wales, ville det være meget nyttigt, hvis Kommissionen kunne præcisere, hvorvidt den walisiske regering rent faktisk ville overtræde EU‑lovgivningen.
Since this ‘dual claims’ issue has affected a large proportion of farmers in Wales, it would be very helpful if the Commission could clarify whether the WAG would in fact be non-compliant with EU legislation.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-5107/2010
Question for written answer E-5107/2010
Om: Krænkelse af privatlivets fred af Google
Subject: Privacy breach by Google
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger, der mener, at tjenesten Google Street View udgør en krænkelse af privatlivets fred, og at dens evne til at opfange og optage indholdet af kommunikation fra trådløse netværker er en yderligere uacceptabel krænkelse af privatlivets fred.
I have been contacted by a constituent who believes that the Google Street View service is an invasion of personal privacy and that its ability to intercept and record the content of communication from wi-fi networks is a further unacceptable breach of privacy.
Jeg kan forstå på den relevante korrespondance, at Kommissionen mener, at de nationale regeringer skal tage sig af dette anliggende.
I understand from the relevant correspondence that the Commission is of the view that this is a matter for national governments to deal with.
Kan Kommissionen imidlertid i betragtning af, at Kommissionen allerede har advaret Google om spørgsmålet om privatlivets fred i forbindelse med den tid, den bør bevare fotografier på Street View, forklare, hvilke foranstaltninger den kan eller vil træffe over for Google og Googles adfærd?
However, seeing that Google has already been warned by the Commission for privacy issues relating to the length of time it ought to retain photographs on Street View, can the Commission assist me in understanding what action it can take or intends to take against Google and its behaviour?