natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Samtidig er der undersøgelser, hvoraf det fremgår, at det europæiske samarbejde og det indre marked yder et væsentligt bidrag til medlemsstaternes BNP.
However, there are studies showing that European cooperation and the internal market make a substantial contribution to Member States' GNP.
Kender Kommissionen resultaterne af en grundig analyse af udgifter og eventuelle fordele for de 27 medlemsstater ved at være EU‑medlem, med tal for de enkelte medlemsstater?
Does the Commission have a detailed analysis of the costs and possible benefits of membership of the European Union for the 27 Member States, with a breakdown by Member State?
Er Kommissionen i bekræftende fald rede til mere aktivt at udbrede kendskabet hertil?
If so, is the Commission prepared to more actively circulate this information?
Er Kommissionen i benægtende fald rede til at udarbejde sådanne analyser, så der kan skabes klarhed omkring udgifter og eventuelle fordele ved at være medlem af EU?
If not, is the Commission prepared to produce such an analysis in order to provide clarity regarding the costs and possible benefits of membership of the European Union?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4447/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4447/07
Om: Sukkerfond og sukkerkvoter
Subject: Sugar fund and quotas
Det ser ud til, at Kommissionens program for en reform af sukkermarkedet ikke fungerer.
The Commission’s sugar market reform programme does not seem to be working.
Sukkerfonden er vokset, og målet om at reducere sukkerkvoterne er ikke blevet nået.
The sugar fund has swelled, and the goal of scaling down sugar quotas has not been attained.
Har den ordning, ifølge hvilken der overvejende ydes kompensation for sukkerkvoterne til virksomhederne i sektoren, efter Kommissionens opfattelse fungeret tilfredsstillende?
Does it consider that the system for offsetting lost quotas, aimed first and foremost at enterprises in the sector, has operated satisfactorily?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4448/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4448/07
»da den [prisangivelse pr. enhed] ikke vedrører grænseoverskridende handel, føler Kommissionen sig ikke foranlediget til at træffe yderligere foranstaltninger over for de britiske myndigheder.
‘as it [unit pricing] does not concern cross border trade, there is no incentive for the Commission to pursue the UK authorities on this issue.
Kommissionen mener, at det primært er et medlemsstatsanliggende«.
The Commission considers this to be primarily a matter for the Member State authorities to deal with’.
Overvejer Kommissionen, da den er af den opfattelse, at medlemsstaterne selv bør afgøre, om der skal stilles krav om prisangivelse pr. enhed, herunder om salg i standardmåleangivelser, selv om detailhandel er omfattet af direktiv 80/­181/­EØF, at udelukke detailhandelsspørgsmål — herunder navnlig prisangivelse pr. enhed — fra direktivets anvendelsesområde, således at hele ansvaret på dette område overlades til medlemsstaterne?
As the Commission believes that the enforcement of unit pricing, including the ability to sell in imperial measurements, is a Member State decision, despite the fact that Directive 80/181/EEC applies to retail matters, would the Commission consider excluding retail matters — unit pricing in particular — from the scope of the directive, leaving Member States responsible for the whole issue?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4449/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4449/07
Om: Kommissionens finansiering
Subject: Commission funding
Vil Kommissionen oplyse, om nogle af de følgende organisationer på noget tidspunkt har modtaget midler fra Kommissionen, og i bekræftende fald hvor mange og hvornår?
Have any of the following organisations ever received money from the European Commission, and if so how much and over what period of time?
De Offentlige Arbejdsgiveres Europæiske Organisation (CEEP) —
European Centre of Enterprises with Public Participation and of Enterprises of General Economic Interest —
Den Europæiske Faglige Samarbejdsorganisation (EFS) —
European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) —
Thomas More‑instituttet —
Institute Thomas More —
CEPS — Det Europæiske Center for Politiske Studier —
CEPS — Centre for European Policy Studies —
Europas Venner —
Friends of Europe —
Det Europæiske Politikcenter (EPC) —
The European Policy Centre (EPC) —
Sammenslutningen af Transeuropæiske Politiske Studier —
Trans-European Policy Studies Association —
ECAS — European Citizen Action Service —
ECAS — European Citizen Action Service —
Det Permanente Forum for det Civile Samfund —
Permanent Forum of Civil Society —
Europæisk borgerinitiativ —
European Citizens' Initiative —
Det Europæiske Forum for Kunst og Kulturarv —
European Forum of the Arts and Heritage —
Association for World Education —
Association for World Education —
Den Europæiske Kulturfond —
European Cultural Foundation —
Det Europæiske Miljøkontor —
European Environmental Bureau —
Det Internationale Råd for Miljølovgivning (ICEL) —
International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL) —
EUROPARC Federation —
EuropaRC Federation —
Middelhavslandenes Informationskontor for Miljø, Kultur og Bæredygtig Udvikling —
Mediterranean Information Office for Environment, Culture, and Sustainable Development —
Det Europæiske Center for Naturbevarelse —
European Centre for Nature Conservation —
Global Witness —
Global Witness —
Climate Action Network Europe —
Climate Action Network Europe —
Health and Environment Alliance
Health and Environment Alliance
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4450/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4450/07
Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsforening (EAHR) —
The European Association for Human Rights —
Det Europæiske Råd for Flygtninge og Personer i Eksil —
European Council on Refugees and Exiles —
Det Europæiske Forbindelseskontor for Fredsopbygning —
The European Peacebuilding Liaison Office — EPLO —
Front Line Defenders —
Front Line Defenders —
Human Rights Watch (HRW) —
Human Rights Watch (HRW) —
Den Humanistiske Menneskerettighedskomité (HOM) —
Humanist Committee on Human Rights (HOM) —
International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) —
International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) —
Det Internationale Menneskerettighedsforbund (FIDH) —
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) —
Den Internationale Føderation Terre des Hommes —
International Federation Terre des Hommes —
Den Internationale Helsingforsføderation for Menneskerettigheder (IHF) —
International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF) —
Den Internationale Sammenslutning af Lesbiske og Bøsser — Europa (ILGA‑Europe) —
International Lesbian and Gay Association — Europe (ILGA-Europe) —
Det Internationale Rehabiliteringsråd for Torturofre (IRCT) —
International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT) —
Den Internationale Redningskomite, Det Forenede Kongerige —
International Rescue Committee UK —
Minority Rights Group International —
Minority Rights Group International —
Open Society Institute‑Bruxelles (OSI-Bruxelles) —
Open Society Institute-Brussels (OSI-Brussels) —
Partnere for Demokratisk Forandring —
Partners for Democratic Change —
Penal Reform International (PRI) —
Penal Reform International (PRI) —
De Internationale Fredsbrigader — den europæiske afdeling —
Peace Brigades International -European Office —
Search for Common Ground —
Search for Common Ground —
La Strada International — europæisk netværk til bekæmpelse af menneskehandel
La Strada International — European Network Against Trafficking in Human Beings
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4451/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4451/07
Den Europæiske Kvindelobby —
European Women's Lobby —
European Public Health Alliance —
European Public Health Alliance —
Social Platform —
Social Platform —
Den Internationale Bevægelse ATD Fourth World —
ATD Fourth World International Movement —
Caritas Europa —
Caritas Europa —
Den Europæiske Organisation for Udvikling af Lokalsamfundsarbejde (CEBSD) —
Combined European Bureau for Social Development (CEBSD) —
Sammenslutningen af Familieorganisationer i Det Europæiske Fællesskab (COFACE) —
Confederation of Family Organisations in the European Union (COFACE) —
Det Europæiske Netværk mod Fattigdom (EAPN) —
European Anti Poverty Network (EAPN) —
Det Europæiske Forbund for Voksenuddannelse (EAEA) —
European Association for the Education of Adults (EAEA) —
Det Europæiske Blindeforbund (EBU) —
European Blind Union (EBU) —
Den Kooperative Europæiske Samarbejdsorganisation (CECOP) —
European Confederation of Workers’ Cooperatives, Social Cooperatives and Participative Enterprises (CECOP) —
Den Europæiske Komité for Almennyttige Organisationer (CEDAG) —
European Council for Non Profit Organisations (CEDAG) —
Det Europæiske Handicapforum (EDF) —
European Disability Forum (EDF) —
Den Europæiske Føderation af Nationale Sammenslutninger, der Arbejder med de Hjemløse (FEANTSA) —
European Federation of National Organisations Working with Homeless (FEANTSA) —
Den Europæiske Ældreforening (EURAG) —
European Federation of the Elderly (EURAG) —
Den Europæiske Forening for Ulønnede Forældre og Plejere i Hjemmet (FEFAF) —
European Federation of Unpaid Parents and Carers at Home (FEFAF) —
Det Europæiske Koordineringsudvalg for Almennyttige Boliger (CECODHAS)
European Liaison Committee for Social Housing (CECODHAS)
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4452/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4452/07
Vil Kommissionen oplyse, om nogle af de følgende organisationer på noget tidspunkt har modtaget midler fra Kommissionen, og i bekræftende fald hvor mange og hvornår?
Have any of the following organisations ever received money from the European Commission, and if so how much, and over what period of time?
International Council on Social Welfare (ICSW) —
International Council on Social Welfare (ICSW) —
Mental Health Europe (MHE) —
Mental Health Europe (MHE) —
Det Europæiske Børnenetværk (Europnet) —
The European Children's Network (Euronet) —
Det Europæiske Center for Frivilligt Arbejde (CEV) —
The European Volunteer Centre (CEV) —
Workability Europe —
Workability Europe —
Det Europæiske Roma — Informationskontor (ERIO) —
European Roma Information Office (ERIO) —
Europæisk Netværk for Arbejdsløse (ENU) —
European Network of the Unemployed (ENU) —
Den Europæiske Civilsamfundsplatform for Livslang Læring (EUCIS- LLL) —
European Civil Society Platform on Lifelong Learning (EUCIS‑LLL) —
APRODEV — Association of World Council of Churches related Development organisations in Europe —
APRODEV — Association of World Council of Churches related Development organisations in Europe —
Den østrigske EU-NGO platform —
EU‑ Plattform — Austrian National Platform —
CIDSE — International cooperation for development and solidarity —
CIDSE — International cooperation for development and solidarity —
Den danske EU-NGO platform —
Danish EU‑NGO National Platform —
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4453/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4453/07
Vil Kommissionen oplyse, om nogle af de følgende organisationer på noget tidspunkt har modtaget midler fra Kommissionen, og i bekræftende fald., hvor mange og hvornår?
Have any of the following organisations ever received money from the European Commission, and if so how much, and over what period of time?
HAND — ungarsk sammenslutning af ngo'er for udvikling og humanitær bistand —
HAND — Hungarian Association of NGOs for Development and Humanitarian Aid —
IPPF — Europæisk Netværk —
IPPF- European Network —
DOCHAS — irsk sammenslutning af ikke-statslige udviklingsorganisationer —
DOCHAS- Irish Organisations of Non-governmental Development Organisations —
Biedrība »Latvijas Platforma attīstības sadarbībai« (LAPAS) —
Biedrība ‘Latvijas Platforma attīstības sadarbībai’ (LAPAS) —
Cercle de Coopération des ONG de Développement —
Cercle de Coopération des ONG de Développement —
OXFAM International —
OXFAM International —
Plataforma Portuguesa das ONGD —
Plataforma Portuguesa das ONGD —
MVRO — den slovakiske ngdo-platform —
MVRO — The Slovak NGDO Platform —
BOND — britiske oversøiske ikke‑statslige udviklingsorganisationer —
BOND — British Overseas NGOs for Development —
World Vision, Bruxelles —
World Vision, Brussels —
Demokratisk Ungdomsverdensforbund —
World Federation of Democratic Youth —
Unionen af Europæiske Føderalister (UEF) —
Union of European Federalists (UEF) —
Det Europæiske Ungdomsforum —
European Youth Forum —
BYC — det britiske ungdomsråd —
BYC — British Youth Council —
CGJL — det luxembourgske ungdomsråd —
CGJL — General Confederation of Luxembourg Youth —
CJE — det spanske ungdomsråd
CJE — Spanish Youth Council
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4454/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4454/07
AEGEE-Europe — den europæiske studenterforening —
AEGEE Europe — European Students' Forum —
DEMYC — Democrat Youth Community of Europe —
DEMYC — Democrat Youth Community of Europe —
ECOSY — Young European Socialists —
ECOSY — Young European Socialists —
EDS — European Democrat Students —
EDS — European Democrat Students —
ESIB — National Unions of Students in Europe —
ESIB — National Unions of Students in Europe —
EUJS/UEEJ — European Union of Jewish Students —
EUJS/UEEJ — European Union of Jewish Students —
IUSY — International Union of Socialist Youth —
IUSY — International Union of Socialist Youth —
IYNF — internationale unge naturvenner —
IYNF — International Young Naturefriends —
JEF-Europe — unge europæiske føderalister —
JEF Europe — Young European Federalists —
OBESSU — Organising Bureau of European School Students Unions —
OBESSU — Organising Bureau of European School Students Unions —
SCI — Service Civil International —
SCI — Service Civil International —
RYEurope — Rural Youth Europe —
RYEurope — Rural Youth Europe —
YAP — Youth Action for Peace —
YAP — Youth Action for Peace —
YEE — Youth and Environment Europe —
YEE — Youth and Environment Europe —
YEPP — Youth of European People's Party —
YEPP — Youth of European People's Party —
YEN — Youth of European Nationalities —
YEN — Youth of European Nationalities —
Coalition for the International Criminal Court —
Coalition for the International Criminal Court —
Demokratisk Koalition/Madrid-klubben —
Democracy Coalition/Club of Madrid —
December 18 —
December 18 —
Menneskerettighedsnetværk for Euro-Middelhavs-området
Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4455/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4455/07
Det Europæiske Netværk mod Racisme (ENAR) —
European Network Against Racism (ENAR) —
Det Europæiske Netværk for Socialt Arbejde (ESAN) —
European Social Action Network (ESAN) —
Federazione ACLI Internazionali (FAI) —
Federazione ACLI Internazionali (FAI) —
Inclusion Europe (den europæiske sammenslutning af organisationer for mentalt handicappede og deres familier) —
Inclusion Europe (The European Association of Societies of Persons with Intellectual Disability and their Families) —
Verdensorganisationen mod Tortur (OMCT) —
World Organisations Against Torture (OMCT) —
Den Internationale Forening for Menneskerettigheder —
International Society for Human Rights —
Fair Trials Abroad —
Fair Trials Abroad —
HÍD ENCEF (beskyttelse af mindretal i Ungarn) —
HÍD ENCEF (Minority protection in Hungary) —
Den Nationale Sammenslutning af Kvinder i Finland —
The National Council of Women of Finland —
Organisationen for Ikke-repræsenterede Nationer og Folk (UNPO) —
Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organisation (UNPO) —
KEHYS ry — finsk ngo-platform —
KEHYS ry — Finish NGO Platform —
Coordination SUD —
Coordination SUD —
International Forum on Development Service —
International Forum on Development Service —
VENRO — Verband Entwicklungspolitik deutscher Nichtregierungsorganisationen —
VENRO — Verband Entwicklungspolitik deutscher Nichtregierungsorganisationen —
CRIJ — Conseil de la Jeunesse d'Expression française, Belgien —
CRIJ — Council for International Youth Relations of the French-speaking Community of Belgium —
DNK — Deutsche Nationalkomitee für internationale Jugendarbeit —
DNK — German National Committee for International Youth Work —
IGLYO — International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Youth and Student Organisation —
IGLYO — International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Youth and Student Organisation —
IFM/SEI — International Falcon Movement — Socialist Educational International —
IFM/SEI — International Falcon Movement — Socialist Educational International —
IFLRY — International Federation of Liberal Youth —
IFLRY — International Federation of Liberal Youth —
FYEG/FJEE — Federation of Young European Greens
FYEG/FJEE — Federation of Young European Greens
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4458/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4458/07
Om: Tildeling af Número de Identidad de Extranjero (N.I.E.) til EU‑borgere i Spanien
Subject: Procedure for issuing the ‘Número de Identidad de Extranjero (N.I.E.)’ to EU citizens in Spain
Er Kommissionen klar over, at hver udstedende myndighed kun kan udstede 60 beviser pr. dag med Número de Identidad de Extranjero (N.I.E.) til EU‑borgere?
Is the Commission aware that only 60 certificates relating to the ‘Número de Identidad de Extranjero (N.I.E.)’ are issued a day by each issuing authority to EU citizens?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvad begrundelsen er for denne fremgangsmåde?
Could the Commission indicate the reasons for this practice?
Mener Kommissionen, at denne metode er i overensstemmelse med traktaterne, særlig forbuddet mod at forskelsbehandle EU‑udlændinge?
In the Commission's view, is this practice in accordance with the Treaty, in particular in relation to the ban on discriminating against foreigners in the EU?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4459/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4459/07
Om: Retssager og domme angående menneskehandel
Subject: Proceedings and sentencing for trafficking in human beings
Kommissionen konstaterede i 2007, at alle EU‑medlemsstater har de nødvendige specifikke retsforskrifter, men at der er store forskelle i strafudmålingen.
In 2007 the Commission noted that, whilst all EU Member States have the necessary special criminal legislation, there are major differences in the level of sentencing.
Kun 42 af disse fik en frihedsstraf, der ikke blev gjort betinget.
Only 42 of them received prison sentences that were not suspended sentences.
Man kan vanskeligt forestille sig, at antallet af forundersøgelsessager afspejler omfanget af menneskehandelen.
It is hard to believe that the number of investigations reflects the actual scale of the problem of people trafficking.
Har Kommissionen oplysninger om antallet af forundersøgelsessager angående menneskehandel og domfældelser i de enkelte EU‑lande?
Does the Commission have data on the number of investigations of trafficking in human beings and sentences imposed in all of the EU Member States?
Er Kommissionen tilfreds med antallet af straffesager i Europa, eller mener den, at menneskehandlerne bliver retsforfulgt i for ringe grad?
Is the Commission satisfied with the number of criminal proceedings in Europe, or does it believe that too little action is being taken to prosecute people traffickers?
Er Kommissionen tilfreds med strafudmålingen for menneskehandlere i Tyskland og andre EU‑stater?
Is the Commission satisfied with the sentences imposed in Germany and other EU Member States on people traffickers?
Hvilket behov for forbedring, mener Kommissionen, der er i forbindelse med strafferetlige forfølgning for menneskehandel, såvel i de enkelte EU‑medlemsstater som på EU‑plan?
In the Commission's view, what improvements need to be made in prosecuting offences of trafficking in human beings both in individual EU Member States and at EU level?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4460/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4460/07
Om: Miljø‑ og sundhedsfarer gennem sødestoffet sucralose
Subject: Environmental and health risks posed by the sweetener sucralose
Sødestoffet sucralose (E 995) har i nogle år haft EU‑godkendelse som levnedsmiddeltilsætningsstof.
The sweetener sucralose (E 955) has for a number of years been authorised in the EU as a food additive.
Verden over anvendes det i 3 500 produkter; tendensen er stigende.
Worldwide it is used in 3500 products and its use is growing.
Der er ikke hidtil forsket i følgerne af de eventuelle farer, som anvendelsen af sucralose indebærer for miljøet.
The impact of the potential risks posed by sucralose for the environment has to date not been explored.
Norske forskere har for nylig påvist sucralose i samtlige vandprøver, selv om stoffet næsten ikke er blevet anvendt i Norge hidtil.
Norwegian scientists recently found sucralose in all water samples analysed, although the substance is scarcely used in Norway.
Sucralose nedbrydes ikke i rensningsanlæg, men fortsætter uhindret i vandløb, hvor det lagres.
Sucralose is not broken down in waste water treatment plants, but makes its way unhindered into waters, where it accumulates.
Der foreligger ikke nøjagtige oplysninger om, hvor længe sucralose forbliver i vandet.
It is not precisely known how long sucralose remains in water.
Alene i Norge er det mellem fem og ti år.
In Norway alone this can last for between 5 and 10 years.
Undersøgelser har også bekræftet, at sucralose er til skade for planters stofskifte, da det forstyrrer transporten af sukker i karrene.
Studies have also confirmed that sucralose harms the metabolic process in plants, as it disrupts the transport of sugars in the vessels.
Hvad ved Kommissionen om de farer, som sucralose indebærer for miljøet?
What does the Commission know about the risks posed by sucralose to the environment?
Er Kommissionen af den opfattelse, at der er forsket tilstrækkeligt i de eventuelle farer, som sucralose indebærer, eller ser den ikke også et presserende behov for forskning?
Does the Commission believe that the potential risks posed by sucralose have been sufficiently explored, or does it not think that there is an urgent need for research?
Mener Kommissionen ikke også, at det er yderst problematisk, at sucralose lagres i vandet og kun nedbrydes langsomt?
Does the Commission not consider it extremely problematical that sucralose accumulates in water and only slowly breaks down there?
Mener Kommissionen ikke også, at de følger, som sucralose har for planters stofskifte, er yderst problematiske?
Does it not consider the impact of sucralose on the metabolic process in plants to be extremely problematical?
Hidtidige undersøgelser om mulige sundhedsfarer for mennesker som følge af sucralose er hovedsagelig blevet gennemført af industrien og har bekræftet, at sucralose kan anvendes uden betænkning.
Studies carried out to date on possible risks to human health posed by sucralose have mainly been conducted by the industry, and they have concluded that sucralose is safe.
Ser Kommissionen på baggrund af de nye oplysninger om miljøfarlighed en eventuel fare for mennesker?
In the light of the new findings on risks posed to the environment, does the Commission see a potential risk for human beings?
Anser Kommissionen det for nødvendigt at tage dette spørgsmål op til ny vurdering?
Does the Commission think that a re‑evaluation is needed?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4461/07
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4461/07
Om: Bevarelse af traditionelle fiskerbåde
Subject: Preservation of traditional fishing vessels
Som led i omstruktureringen af fællesskabsflåden er der planer om at ophugge og ødelægge fiskerbåde, heriblandt også mange traditionelle træbåde.
As part of the restructuring of the Community fleet, it is proposed to break-up and destroy fishing vessels, including many traditional wooden vessels.
Fra 1991 regner man med, at der i Grækenland vil være gået omkring 10 000 både af denne type tabt.
It is calculated that in Greece some 10 000 such vessels have disappeared since 1991.
På baggrund af, at støtteforanstaltningen for ophugning af skibe også vil gælde for den kommende programmeringsperiode, vil der være nogle få kaiker, »trehantiri'er« (lette sejlbåde) og »karnagio'er« (traditionelle træbeddinger) tilbage, mens den græske skibsbygningsteknik med 2 500 år på bagen risikerer at forsvinde.
Given that the measure subsidising the breaking-up of fishing vessels will also apply during the next programming period, very few caiques, trehantiris and karnagios will remain, and Greece's 2 500 year-old shipbuilding skills will be on the verge of disappearing forever.
Hvordan agter Kommissionen at bidrage til bevarelsen af den traditionelle skibsbygnings‑ og reparationsteknik?
How does the Commission intend to contribute to the preservation of traditional shipbuilding and ship repair skills?