natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5657/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5657/09
af Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska (PPE)
by Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska (PPE)
Om: Forskelle i bankers gebyrer for betjening af betalinger med kredit- og betalingskort
Subject: Disparities in bank charges for credit card and bank card payments
Jeg beder Kommissionen om at forklare forskellene i bankers gebyrer for betjening af betalinger med kredit- og betalingskort i de forskellige EU-lande.
Could the Commission explain the disparities between individual Member States in the commission charged by banks for credit card and bank card payments?
Gebyrerne for betjening af betalinger med kreditkort er meget høje i Polen og udgør 1,3-1,7 % af bruttotransaktionerne for brændstof og op til 3 % for forbrugsgoder.
The charges for payments made using credit cards in Poland are very high, ranging from 1.3 % to 1.7 % of the gross amount for fuel purchases up to 3 % for other consumer goods.
Terminalleasingfirmaer opkræver desuden 40-100 PLN for leasingen.
In addition, suppliers of payment terminals charge monthly fees of 40 to 100 zloty.
Gebyrerne i de såkaldte »gamle« EU-lande er betydelig lavere og udgør f.eks. 0,4-0,9 % for brændstoffer i Tyskland.
In the countries of the ‘old Union’, however, rates are much lower, with commission on fuel purchases in Germany being 0.4 % to 0.9 %, for example.
To faktorer har betydning for gebyrernes størrelse: interbankgebyrerne og nettomargenen, men interbankgebyrerne udgør næsten 90 % af provisionen.
Two factors affect the amount of commission: interchange fees and the net margin, with the interchange fee making up around 90 % of the commission charge.
Disse tiltag har dog ikke ført til lavere gebyrer.
That measure has not, however, led to a lowering of the commission charges in question.
Jeg vil derfor gerne bede Kommissionen om at analysere sagen og svare på, om de polske forbrugeres rettigheder er blevet krænket.
In view of the above, could the Commission examine this matter and indicate whether it constitutes a violation of the rights of Polish consumers?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5658/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5658/09
af Jarosław Kalinowski (PPE)
by Jarosław Kalinowski (PPE)
Om: Ændring af regler om opdræt af æglæggende høner og mærkning af æg
Subject: Changes to the principles regarding the rearing of laying hens and the labelling of eggs
De nye medlemslande, herunder Polen, har problemer med at opfylde kravene, da de har haft kortere tid til at indføre direktivet.
The new Member States, including Poland, are facing a problem because the preparation period for applying this new Directive is too short.
Den største hindring skyldes, at det ikke er muligt at finansiere udskiftningen af burene inden udgangen af 2011.
The main problem is the lack of funds to replace the cages by the end of 2011.
Vores producenter har investeret i indkøb af bure flere år senere, og disse kreditter skal betales inden 2018.
Our producers invested in the purchase of new cages several years later and they will be repaying for the loans taken out for that purpose until 2018.
Hvad skyldes dette?
What is the reason for this situation?
Kan Kommissionen ikke se de problemer, som landmændene har med at tilpasse dyrkningen til kravene i 1999/74/EF?
Does the Commission recognise the difficulties farmers are having to face in order to comply with the requirements of Directive 1999/74/EC?
Er der planer om at gennemføre en grundig analyse af årsagerne til den nuværende situation, hvor blot 5-7 % af hele bedriften i EU ifølge LEI og ITAVI opbevares i stimulusberigede bure?
Is the Commission planning to carry out a detailed analysis of the causes of the present situation, when, according to LEI and ITAVI, only 5-7 % of rearing systems in the whole of the EU are enriched cage systems?
Hvad er Kommissionens officielle holdning til at anvende tallet 4 indtil 2012 til at skelne mellem æg, der er produceret med høje omkostninger til følge, og æg fra ikkekonventionelle bure (med lavere produktionsomkostninger)?
What is the Commission’s official position on using the number 4 until 2012 to distinguish eggs produced in high-cost rearing systems from those produced in non-conventional cages (with lower production costs)?
Overvejer Kommissionen sluttelig at forlænge tilladelsen til at anvende konventionelle bure efter udgangen af 2011?
Is the Commission considering the possibility of extending the authorised use of non-conventional cages beyond the end of 2011?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5659/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5659/09
Om: Drab på dyr i Kiev
Subject: Killings of animals in Kiev
I 2012 er Kiev medarrangør af EM i fodbold.
In 2012, Kiev will be one of the venues for the European Football Championship.
Allerede nu begynder hovedstaden i Ukraine at forberede sig på denne begivenhed.
The Ukrainian capital is already beginning to prepare for this event.
For at give de mange besøgende indtryk af en »ren« by skal ca. 10 000 gadehunde i Kiev dræbes.
In order to give the many visitors the impression that it is a ‘clean’ city, some 10000 stray dogs are to be killed in Kiev.
Dyreværnsorganisationer i ind- og udland tordner mod de grusomme foranstaltninger.
Animal welfare organisations at home and abroad are up in arms about these cruel measures.
I Østrig er man allerede i gang med at underskrive andragender mod denne hundeslagtning, som skal fremlægges for den ukrainske regering.
In Austria, petitions have been signed against this slaughter of dogs, which are to be submitted to the Ukrainian Government.
Er EU bekendt med de foranstaltninger, der iværksættes i Ukraine?
Is the EU aware of the measures being taken in Ukraine?
Har der været forhandlinger mellem repræsentanter for EU og UEFA om problemstillingen?
Has the problem been discussed between representatives of the European Union and UEFA?
Er EU bekendt med, om der er iværksat foranstaltninger med henblik på en boykot af Ukraine som arrangørland for EM i andre medlemsstater?
Does the European Union know whether any boycott measures against Ukraine as an EFC venue have been adopted in other Member States?
Planlægger EU foranstaltninger for at støtte dyreværnsorganisationerne i Ukraine?
Is the European Union planning measures to support animal welfare organisations in Ukraine?
Hvordan forholder EU sig til disse foranstaltninger?
What is the European Union's view of these measures?
Det er ikke blevet underrettet om nogen boykotforanstaltninger mod Ukraine fra medlemsstaters side.
It has not been informed of any boycott measures against Ukraine on the part of Member States.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5660/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5660/09
Om: Spinal muskelatrofi (SMA)
Subject: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)
Hvor mange lider af en muskelsygdom i Tyskland og Europa?
How many sufferers of muscular disorders are there in Germany and Europe?
Hvor mange af dem lider af SMA?
How many of those have SMA?
Hvor meget udgør EU's støtte til forskning i disse sygdomme i alt og om muligt specifikt for SMA?
What is the level of EU support for research into these diseases overall and for SMA, in particular, if such data is available?
Hvor meget udgør støtten fra selvhjælpsgrupper i EU til forskning i disse sygdomme i alt og om muligt specifikt for SMA?
What is the level of support from self-help groups in the EU for research into these diseases overall and for SMA, in particular, if such data is available?
Hvor meget udgør støtten til andre sygdomsbilleder som kræft, overvægt o.l.?
What is the level of support for other diseases, such as cancer, obesity, etc.?
Hvordan er pengene fordelt på grundforskning og klinisk forskning?
What is the division of funding between basic research and clinical research?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5661/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5661/09
Om: Kommissær Verheugens udtalelser
Subject: Statements by Commissioner Verheugen
I et interview for nylig med den østrigske avis »Der Standard« udtalte kommissær Günter Verheugen (Industri), at han ikke ser noget problem med et prioriteret partnerskab med Tyrkiet.
In a recent interview with the Austrian newspaper ‘Der Standard’, Commissioner Günter Verheugen (Industry) stated that he was no advocate of a privileged partnership with Turkey.
Ifølge ham har tyrkerne allerede et sådant partnerskab, eftersom de er stærkere forbundet med EU end nogen anden stat.
In his opinion the Turks already have such a partnership, having closer ties with the EU than any other State.
Kommissær Verheugen siger ligeledes, at EU har mere brug Tyrkiet end omvendt (Der Standard, 18. oktober 2009).
Commissioner Verheugen also said that the EU needed Turkey more than Turkey needed the EU (Der Standard, 18 October 2009).
Hun støtter en anden strategi.
She favours a different strategy.
Mere konkret forestiller hun sig en slags permanent struktureret dialog mellem EU, Tyrkiet og Rusland, en såkaldt »Dialog-Format E-3«.
More precisely, she speaks of a kind of permanent structured dialogue between the EU, Turkey and Russia, a so-called ‘dialogue format E‑3’.
Som bekendt eksisterer der gensidig afhængighed mellem de tre aktører, men de har ofte også andre interesser.
The justification is that the three parties are mutually dependent, but often have different interests.
I denne model bliver Tyrkiet revalueret og anerkendt, og landet opretholder alligevel meget tætte økonomiske, politiske og militære forbindelser med EU (Barbara Lippert, »EU-Erweiterungspolitik: Wege aus der Sackgasse«, SWP-Aktuell 46, august 2009).
In this model, Turkey's status would be upgraded and it would be recognised as a regional power and yet continue to maintain very close economic, political and military relations with the EU (Barbara Lippert, ‘EU‑Erweiterungspolitik: Wege aus der Sackgasse’, SWP-Aktuell 46, August 2009).
Deler Kommissionen som helhed udtalelserne fra kommissær Verheugen?
Does the Commission as a whole endorse Mr Verheugen's statements?
Når kommissær Verheugen udtaler, at EU har mere brug for Tyrkiet end omvendt, repræsenterer han så Kommissionens standpunkt som helhed?
When Commissioner Verheugen says that the EU needs Turkey more than Turkey needs the EU, does that represent the collective view of the Commission?
I hvilken henseende har EU i bekræftende fald mere brug for Tyrkiet end omvendt?
If so, in what respect does the EU need Turkey more than Turkey needs the EU?
Har Kommissionen allerede taget højde for den tankegang, som dr. Lippert beskriver?
Has the Commission considered the approach described by Dr Lippert?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5662/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5662/09
Om: Afgifter på personbiler på grundlag af miljøpræstationer
Subject: Taxing passenger cars on the basis of environmental performance
Kommissionen forelagde den 5. juli 2005 et forslag til direktiv om afgifter på personbiler (KOM(2005)0261).
On 5 July 2005 the Commission submitted a proposal on passenger car related taxes (COM(2005)0261).
Parlamentet afsluttede sin førstebehandling den 5. september 2006.
Parliament completed its first reading on 5 September 2006.
Siden da har bolden ligget hos Rådet.
Since then, it has been for the Council to make a move.
Efter mødet i Rådet den 13. november 2007 blev der imidlertid stille omkring dette forslag.
Since the Council meeting on 13 November 2007, however, there has been silence on this proposal.
Alligevel stod det i pressemeddelelsen at læse, at formandskabet og Kommissionen ville drøfte, hvordan man skulle fortsætte med denne sag.
It was nonetheless stated in the press release that the Presidency, together with the Commission, would consider how to proceed with the dossier.
Behandler Rådet stadig dette forslag?
Has there been further discussion in the Council on this proposal?
Hvilke konklusioner er der draget efter drøftelserne med Kommissionen?
What conclusions were drawn after consideration with the Commission?
Er tiden ikke moden til at fortsætte behandlingen af dette forslag, i betragtning af at skattemæssige incitamenter vil kunne spille en vigtig rolle i bestræbelserne på at nå klimamålene?
Is it not time to discuss this proposal further, given that tax incentives can play a significant role in achieving climate goals?
På Rådets samling den 13. november 2007 var der bred støtte til afgiftsmæssige foranstaltninger for at bekæmpe miljøskadelig adfærd, men delte meninger om behovet for fællesskabslovgivning på personbilområdet.
While tax measures aimed at discouraging environmentally damaging behaviour were largely supported at the Council meeting on 13 November 2007, views diverged on the need for a Community legislation in the area of passenger cars.
Drøftelserne om dette forslag har ikke været genoptaget i Rådet siden da.
Discussions on this proposal have not been resumed in the Council since then.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5663/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5663/09
Efter en første høring i Rådet den 13. november 2007 blev der stille omkring dette forslag.
Since an initial debate in the Council on 13 November 2007, there has been silence on this proposal.
Imidlertid stod det i pressemeddelelsen at læse, at formandskabet og Kommissionen ville drøfte, hvordan man skulle fortsætte med denne sag.
It was nonetheless stated in the press release that the Presidency, together with the Commission, would consider how to proceed with the dossier.
Hvilken rolle spillede Kommissionen i drøftelsen af dette forslag?
What was the Commission's role in considering this proposal?
Hvilke konklusioner er der draget i den forbindelse?
What conclusions were drawn?
Er tiden ikke moden til igen at lægge forslaget (eller en ændret udgave) på bordet, i betragtning af at skattemæssige incitamenter vil kunne spille en vigtig rolle i bestræbelserne på at nå klimamålene?
Is it not time to resubmit this proposal (or an amended version), given that tax incentives can play a significant role in achieving climate goals?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5664/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5664/09
af Janusz Wojciechowski (ECR) , Adam Bielan (ECR) , Tadeusz Cymański (ECR) , Ryszard Czarnecki (ECR) , Marek Józef Gróbarczyk (ECR) , Paweł Robert Kowal (ECR) , Jacek Olgierd Kurski (ECR) , Marek Henryk Migalski (ECR) , Tomasz Piotr Poręba (ECR) , Mirosław Piotrowski (ECR) , Konrad Szymański (ECR) , Jacek Włosowicz (ECR) og Zbigniew Ziobro (ECR)
by Janusz Wojciechowski (ECR) , Adam Bielan (ECR) , Tadeusz Cymański (ECR) , Ryszard Czarnecki (ECR) , Marek Józef Gróbarczyk (ECR) , Paweł Robert Kowal (ECR) , Jacek Olgierd Kurski (ECR) , Marek Henryk Migalski (ECR) , Tomasz Piotr Poręba (ECR) , Mirosław Piotrowski (ECR) , Konrad Szymański (ECR) , Jacek Włosowicz (ECR) and Zbigniew Ziobro (ECR)
Om: Dyrkning af genmodificerede planter og Kommissionens reaktion på indførte forbud mod denne dyrkningsform
Subject: Growing of GM plants and Commission's reaction to bans thereon
Vi vil derfor gerne bede Kommissionen tage stilling til følgende forhold: 1.
In this connection, can the Commission: 1.
Hvilke medlemsstater har indført permanent eller midlertidigt forbud mod dyrkning af gmo'er? 3.
say which Member States have introduced a temporary or permanent ban on GM crops; 3.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5665/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5665/09
Om: En reel udligning af niveauet for direkte betalinger til landmænd i EU
Subject: Genuine alignment of direct payments for EU farmers
Parlamentsmedlemmerne fremhævede i forhandlingen, at de foreslåede beløb pr. ha ifølge omregningssatser er to, ja sågar tre gange mindre for de nye medlemsstater sammenlignet med de gamle medlemslande.
During the debate in Parliament Members stressed that the per-hectare payments proposed for the new Member States were two — or even three — times lower than those for the old Member States.
Arbejder Rådet på at fastsætte nye maksimumsstørrelser for direkte betalinger, så de nye medlemsstater ikke diskrimineres?
Is the Council working on setting a new ceiling for direct payments that does not discriminate against the new Member States?
Mener Rådet, at det hidtidige betalingssystem, der historisk set er baseret på produktionsindikatorer, kan bruges nu, hvor der indføres et system med arealbetalinger, der er uafhængige af produktionsniveauet?
Does it consider that the existing support arrangements, which have historically been based on production indicators, are still valid in the light of the introduction of a system of area payments decoupled from production?
Er det forsvarligt at bevare det differentierede niveau for landbrugsbetalinger set i lyset af principperne for ligebehandling af medlemsstaterne og konkurrencereglerne?
Are continued disparities in farm payments acceptable from the standpoint of equal opportunities for Member States and of the competition rules?
Som led i aftalen om »sundhedstjekket« har Rådet og Kommissionen forpligtet sig til nøje at undersøge mulighederne for at udvikle ordningen med direkte betalinger i Fællesskabet og at gøre noget ved de forskellige niveauer for direkte betalinger i medlemsstaterne.
As part of the agreement on the ‘Health Check’, the Council and the Commission undertook to thoroughly examine the possibilities for development of the direct payment system in the Community and to address the differing levels of direct payments between Member States.
Dette spørgsmål blev drøftet på det uformelle møde mellem landbrugsministrene i Brno den 2. juni 2009 og vil blive behandlet i Rådet igen samt i Europa-Parlamentet i forbindelse med drøftelserne om den kommende fælles landbrugspolitik efter 2013, som efter planen skal indledes næste år.
This issue was discussed at the informal meeting of Agriculture Ministers in Brno on 2 June 2009 and will continue to be examined in the Council, as well as in the European Parliament, in the context of the discussions on the future of the CAP post-2013 which are scheduled to begin next year.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5666/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5666/09
Arbejder Kommissionen på at fastsætte nye maksimumsstørrelser for direkte betalinger, så de nye medlemsstater ikke diskrimineres?
Is the Commission working on setting a new ceiling for direct payments that does not discriminate against the new Member States?
Mener Kommissionen, at det hidtidige betalingssystem, der historisk set er baseret på produktionsindikatorer, kan bruges nu, hvor der indføres et system med arealbetalinger, der er uafhængige af produktionsniveauet?
Does it consider that the existing support arrangements, which have historically been based on production indicators, are still valid in the light of the introduction of a system of area payments decoupled from production?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5667/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5667/09
af Marek Henryk Migalski (ECR)
by Marek Henryk Migalski (ECR)
Om: Europas energisikkerhed
Subject: European energy security
Rusland påstår ganske vist, at de har gjort alt, hvad de kan, for at frigøre en del af midlerne til gasgennemførslen, men det virker forkert, at landet kræver, at EU skal betale regningen fra Gazprom.
Although Russia maintains that it has done all it can on its side, by releasing part of the resources required to ensure the continued supply of gas, it is inappropriate for it to demand that the EU pay Gazprom's bills.
Jeg vil i denne forbindelse gerne spørge Kommissionen, om den har modtaget en officiel anmodning fra Rusland.
Has the Commission received an official request from Russia in connection with the above matter?
Har Kommissionen til hensigt at betale Ukraines gæld over for Gazprom?
Does it intend to pay off Ukraine's debts to Gazprom?
Hvis det er tilfældet, vil jeg gerne bede om angivelse af det retslige grundlag for denne beslutning.
If so, on what legal basis?
Jeg vil også gerne vide, om EU har en nødplan, hvis leveringen af russisk gas indstilles.
Does the European Union have an emergency plan to cope with possible disruptions of gas supplies from Russia?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5668/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5668/09
Om: Udbytte af sundhedsprojekter
Subject: Benefit of health projects
Den 1. januar 2008 blev EU's andet handlingsprogram inden for folkesundhed iværksat.
The Second EU Action programme in the field of public health was launched on 1 January 2008.
For perioden 2008‑2013 blev der afsat finansielle midler på 321,5 millioner euro.
The scheme involves funding of 321.5 million euros for the period 2008-2013.
De fleste af disse sundhedsprojekter har imidlertid ofte indbyggede svagheder.
However, most of these health projects often point up conceptual weaknesses.
I sin revisionsrapport for »EU's program inden for folkesundhed 2003‑2007« kommer Revisionsretten til det resultat, at de fleste af de projekter, som EU støtter, ikke skaber tilstrækkelig merværdi for befolkningens sundhed.
In its audit report on the EU’s public health programme for 2003-2007 the European Court of Auditors comes to the conclusion that most of the projects backed by the EU do not deliver sufficient added value for public health.
Udarbejder Kommissionen regelmæssigt cost‑benefit‑analyser for sådanne projekter? 2.
Does the Commission regularly carry out cost-benefit analyses on programmes of this kind? 2.
Hvad kan Kommissionen gøre for bedre at kontrollere målsætningen for projekter inden for folkesundhed? 3.
What can the Commission do to better monitor the purposes of projects in the field of public health? 3.
Hvilke muligheder har Kommissionen for bedre at kunne vurdere eller forudse, om et projekt er bæredygtigt?
What options does the Commission have for better assessing and/or predicting a project’s sustainability?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5669/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5669/09
Om: Sænkning af termineringsafgifter for mobiltelefoni i Bulgarien i forbrugernes interesse
Subject: Reducing mobile call termination charges in Bulgaria in the interests of consumers
På baggrund af de krav og forslag, som Kommissionen stillede i begyndelsen af 2009, besluttede tilsynsmyndigheden at gøre noget, bl.a. også at sænke termineringsafgifterne fra 11,76 cent pr. minut (juli 2009) til 6,65 cent pr. minut (juli 2010).
It was in the light of requirements and suggestions presented by the Commission early in 2009 that the CRC decided to act, with measures including a reduction of the termination charges from 11.76 cents per minute (July 2009 level) to 6.65 cents per minute by July 2010.
Dermed vil den bulgarske tilsynsmyndighed opnå, at afgifterne fra juli 2010 skal ligge under det nuværende EU‑gennemsnit, som er på 8,55 cent pr. minut (juli 2009).
The Bulgarian regulator's intention is that, as of July 2010, the charges should be below the current EU average — which was 8.55 cents per minute in July 2009.
Som følge heraf vil afgifterne i Bulgarien i 2010 igen ligge over det europæiske gennemsnit, uafhængigt af de faktiske bestræbelser og det, der er opnået.
As a result — and regardless of the real efforts being made and the progress achieved to date — Bulgaria's termination charges in 2010 will still be above the European average.
Efter Kommissionens opfattelse skal de forestående ændringer entydigt bevirke, at afgifterne i Bulgarien ligger under det europæiske gennemsnit.
The Commission's position is that the impending changes must have the unequivocal effect of bringing the charges down to a level below the European average.
Set ud fra den aktuelle situation vil man dog helt klart ikke nå dette mål, medmindre den planlagte fremgangsmåde korrigeres.
Plainly, given the current situation, that goal is unattainable unless the existing plan of action is revised.
Hvornår vil Kommissionen genoptage forhandlingerne med den bulgarske tilsynsmyndighed og forelægge sine betænkeligheder og henstillinger, så det kan sikres, at afgifterne i midten af 2010 virkelig ligger under det forventede gennemsnitlige prisniveau i EU?
When does the Commission intend to reopen talks with the CRC and to outline its concerns and recommendations, in order to ensure that these charges really are below the anticipated average for the EU in mid‑2010?
Hvilke instrumenter vil Kommissionen bruge for at nå dette mål?
How does the Commission intend to achieve this aim?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5670/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5670/09
af Ole Christensen (S&D)
by Ole Christensen (S&D)
Om: Sikring af læsevenligheden af undertekster på DVD og Blu-ray
Subject: Legibility of subtitles on DVDs and Blu-ray discs
Der findes mange forskellige måder at tekste film på.
There are many different ways of subtitling films.