natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
På baggrund heraf kan Rådet forsikre det ærede medlem om, at spørgsmålet fortsat vil blive fulgt nøje og bragt op på alle relevante niveauer, da gode forbindelser med naboerne er et af de krav, som Tyrkiets fremskridt i forhandlingerne bedømmes efter.
Against this background, the Council can assure the Honourable Member that the issue will continue to be closely followed and raised on all levels as appropriate, as good neighbourly relations are one of the requirements against which Turkey's progress in the negotiations is being measured.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2179/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2179/10
Under henvisning til, at de tyrkiske jagerfly ikke kun krænkede græsk luftrum endnu en gang, men også chikanerede en helikopter, der var på mission for Frontex, hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen så at træffe for at afværge yderligere episoder ved EU's sydlige grænser?
Given that the Turkish air force has once again not only violated Greek airspace, but also harassed a helicopter engaged in a Frontex mission, what measures will the Commission take to prevent any recurrence of such incidents at the European Union's southern borders?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2180/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2180/10
Om: Fortsat provokatorisk holdning — FYROM
Subject: Continuing provocative behaviour by FYROM
Ifølge en artikel for nylig har borgmesteren i byen Bitola i FYROM, Vladimir Talefski, aflyst at rejse en statue af Alexander den Stores far Filip 2. til hest på en central plads i byen.
According to recent press reports, the mayor of the town of Bitola in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia has suspended the construction of an equestrian statue of Philip II, father of Alexander the Great, in the town's main square.
Som han selv udtrykte det, ønsker han ikke, at anbringelsen af statuen sender forkerte politiske signaler i det for FYROM kritiske vendepunkt i landets udsigt til optagelse i EU.
The mayor has said that he does not want the statue to send out the wrong political message at a critical juncture for FYROM's prospects of accession.
Det er tydeligt, at der i dette land opdyrkes et klima med tilraning af Grækenlands historie og kulturarv, samt at de institutionelle faktorer med gentagne handlinger og gerninger provokerer nabolandet Grækenland.
Clearly, a climate is being created in the country where attempts are being made to usurp the history and cultural heritage of Greece, while the actions and behaviour of the country's institutions serve to continually provoke its neighbour, Greece.
Indirekte, men tydeligt insinuerer disse handlinger territoriale krav mod Grækenland i form af tilraning af dets historie og symboler.
It is plain that this appropriation of the history and symbols of Greece indirectly conceals a territorial claim on its neighbour.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2181/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2181/10
Om: Kvinders rettigheder i Yemen
Subject: Women's rights in Yemen
I avisartikler står der den 23. marts 2010, at der er blevet afholdt en demonstration foran parlamentet i Sanaá for indførelsen af en lov, der fastsætter, at piger i Yemen først må blive gift, når de er 17 år, eftersom der er mange eksempler på tvangsægteskaber af piger under 17 år og endda helt ned til 10 år.
According to press reports of 23 March 2010, demonstrations have been held outside the Yemeni parliament in Sana'a calling for the introduction of a law making 17 the minimum age for women to marry in Yemen, given the frequent cases in which women under that age are coerced into ‘forced’ marriages, including girls as young as 10.
Loven, der forsvarer kvinder, blev vedtaget i 2009 af Yemens parlament uden dog at blive ratificeret på grund af reaktioner fra parlamentsmedlemmer fra forskellige politiske partier.
This law to protect women was approved in 2009 by the Yemeni parliament, but has never been ratified because of opposition from members of various political parties.
Hvilken retlig pression kan Kommissionen udøve over for Yemens parlament for hurtigst muligt at få implementeret denne lov, der elementært forsvarer kvindernes rettigheder?
What legal pressures can the Commission bring to bear on the Yemeni parliament to speed up the enforcement of this law, which offers substantial protection for women's rights?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2182/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2182/10
Om: Genetisk modificeret majs MON 810
Subject: MON 810 transgenic corn
Den genmodificerede majssort ΜΟΝ 810 er et produkt fra det amerikanske firma Monsato, der dækker 97 % af det globale marked.
MON 810 transgenic corn is produced by the American company Monsanto, which dominates 97 % of the global market.
Dette specifikke produkt anklages ofte for at indeholde stoffer, der er farlige for menneskers sundhed, samt for den strategi, som firmaet anvender for at opnå en stor markedsandel.
Doubts are regularly cast on this product because it contains substances harmful to human health, but also because of the strategies pursued by the company to expand its market share.
På grund af ovennævnte meddelte Tyskland i april 2009, at det opgiver at dyrke det specifikke produkt.
As a result, Germany announced that it was halting production of this product in April 2009.
Hvor stor en andel af det europæiske marked udgør produktet ΜΟΝ 810?
What share of the European market does the product MON 810 account for and has it been subject to controls under Article 82 of the Treaty (abuse of a dominant position)?
Påtænker EU at forny tilladelsen til dyrkning af det specifikke produkt?
Does the European Union plan to renew the authorisation granted for the cultivation of this product?
Hvilke konklusioner om anvendelse af majs MON 810's indvirkninger på såvel menneskers sundhed som landmændenes indtægter er den nået frem til?
What conclusions has the Commission drawn from the assessments made of the effects of the use of MON 810 corn on human health and on farmers' crops?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2183/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2183/10
Om: Evaluering af programmer om livslang læring i Grækenland
Subject: Assessment of lifelong learning programmes in Greece
For at kunne konstatere resultaterne af programmerne om livslang læring i de enkelte medlemsstater inddeler EU dem efter det antal borgere, der på de nationale statistiske tjenesters spørgeskemaer angiver, at de har deltaget i relevante programmer.
In order to examine the performance of individual Member States in the field of lifelong learning programmes, the European Union grades Member States according to the number of citizens who say they have taken part in such programmes in questionnaires drawn up by national statistical services.
Men den måde, som spørgsmålene formuleres på, og spørgeskemaerne udarbejdes på af de nationale statistiske tjenester, kan medføre usikre resultater, eftersom spørgsmålene enten kan være dårligt formuleret eller anakronistiske.
However, given the way in which national statistical services draw up the questionnaires, with poorly framed and out of date questions, there is some doubt as to the validity of the findings.
For eksempel anvendes det samme spørgeskema i Grækenland i dag som i 2004, hvilket resulterer i, at mange af spørgsmålene ikke lever op til den nutidige virkelighed.
Greece, for example, has been using the same questionnaire since 2004 and many of the questions are out of date.
Anser den det for formålstjenligt at udarbejde et fælles spørgeskema for alle medlemsstater, så man opnår mere troværdige resultater? 2.
Does the Commission think it would be worthwhile to draw up a standard questionnaire for all Member States to ensure that results are more reliable?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2184/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2184/10
Om: Voksenundervisning i Grækenland
Subject: Second chance schools in Greece
Voksenundervisning er en værdifuld institution for uddannelse og efteruddannelse af personer, der af forskellige grunde har forladt deres uddannelser før tid, men efter nogle år beslutter sig for at genoptage dem.
Second chance schools are a valuable institution for the education and training of people who, for one reason or another, left school early and have decided years later to return.
Men alt efter uddannelsessystemernes særlige karakteristika i EU's medlemslande og i kombination med sociale karakteristika hos de grupper, som de henvender sig til, udformer de enkelte medlemsstater selv deres egen individuelle model for voksenundervisning.
All the Member States have different models of second chance schools, tailored to the particular features of their educational systems and the social characteristics of target groups.
Omtalte institution begyndte at fungere i Grækenland i 1997, og i dag findes der 48 voksenundervisningsskoler.
Second chance schools were introduced in Greece in 1997 and now number 48.
Men samtidigt med at ansøgningerne om optagelse på omtalte skoler stiger, ser man stagnation i oprettelsen af nye skoler.
However, the opening of new schools has stalled, despite the rising demand for places.
Råder den over oplysninger om de samlede præstationer i de 27 medlemsstater? 3.
Does it have any information on the overall performance of such schools in the 27 Member States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2185/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2185/10
af Kriton Arsenis (S&D) og Chrysoula Paliadeli (S&D)
by Kriton Arsenis (S&D) and Chrysoula Paliadeli (S&D)
Om: Ugennemsigtighed i Kommissionens kommunikation med tysk bilfabrik under forberedelsen af lovgivning om bilers udledninger
Subject: Lack of transparency in contacts between the Commission and the German automobile industry during the drawing up of legislation on pollutant emissions from motor vehicles
I marts 2007 indgav miljøorganisationen Friends of the Earth Europe en anmodning om at få indsigt i den brevudveksling, som den daværende næstformand af Kommissionen, Günter Verheugen, havde med bilfabrikkerne under høringsprocessen om forberedelsen af et lovgivningsforslag om en formindskelse af udledninger fra personbiler.
In March 2007, the environmental organisation ‘Friends of the Earth Europe’ requested copies of the correspondence between Günter Verheugen, then Commission Vice-President, and car manufacturers during the consultations prior to the legislative proposal on reducing pollutant emissions from motor vehicles.
Kommissionen gav oplysninger om de breve, som den daværende næstformand havde udvekslet med bilfabrikkerne på nær tre breve vedrørende den tyske bilfabrik Porsche AG.
The Commission provided the organisation with copies of the correspondence, with the exception of three letters concerning the German car maker Porsche AG.
Dernæst henvendte organisationen sig til den europæiske ombudsmand, der fremkom med en for organisationen positiv anbefaling.
The organisation then appealed to the European Ombudsman, which ruled in its favour.
Men der skulle gå 15 måneder, inden Kommissionen efterlevede ombudsmandens anbefalinger.
However, it took the Commission 15 months to comply with the Ombudsman's recommendations.
Ifølge en repræsentant for organisationen skyldtes Kommissionens fortsatte vægring ved at efterleve forespørgslen, at Kommissionen og kommissær Verheugen ville beskytte den tyske bilfabriks interesser.
According to a representative of the organisation, the Commission's consistent refusal to comply is due to the fact that the Commission and Commissioner Verheugen ‘are protecting the interests of the German car industry’.
I forbindelse med sagen kritiserede ombudsmanden for nylig Kommissionen for at have overtrådt sin forpligtelse til i henhold til EU-traktaten at samarbejde med ham med oprigtighed og god tro.
In connection with this case, the Ombudsman recently criticised the Commission for failing to meet its obligation under the Treaty to cooperate with him openly and in good faith.
Han bad for første gang siden denne institutions oprettelse i 1995 om Parlamentets støtte, idet han karakteristisk udtalte, at Kommissionens indstilling var i modstrid med det grundlæggende retsstatsprincip.
For the first time since the office was established in 1995, the Ombudsman has asked Parliament to intervene, stressing specifically that the Commission's position was contrary to the basic principle of the rule of law.
På grundlag af ovennævnte bedes Kommissionen oplyse følgende: 1.
In the light of the above, will the Commission answer the following questions: 1.
Agter den at meddele miljøorganisationen Friends of the Earth Europe det fulde indhold af de omstridte breve? 2.
Has the environmental organisation ‘Friends of the Earth Europe’ been provided with the full content of the correspondence in question? 2.
Har den opfyldt sin forpligtelse i henhold til artikel 228 i traktaten om Unionens funktionsmåde, der påbyder at svare ombudsmanden inden for tre måneder? 3.
Has the Commission complied with its obligations under Article 228 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which requires it to reply to the Ombudsman within three months? 3.
Anser den Kommissionens sene efterlevelse, tre år efter den oprindelige anmodning og 15 måneder efter ombudsmandens anbefaling, for rimelig og i overensstemmelse med retsstatsprincippet? 4.
Does it consider it reasonable, and in keeping with the principle of the rule of law, to delay three years after the organisation's initial request and 15 months after the Ombudsman's recommendations before acting? 4.
Hvad er grunden til forskelsbehandlingen af denne bestemte bilfabrik, eftersom Kommissionen oplyste om de breve, som var blevet udvekslet med de øvrige bilfabrikker?
Why was this particular car manufacturer given special treatment, when correspondence with other manufacturers had been made available?
Er denne forskelsbehandling i overensstemmelse med EU's lovgivning?
Is such special treatment consistent with European law?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2186/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2186/10
Jeg er blevet kontaktet af en vælger, der har læst om INDECT-projektet (intelligent informationssystem til observation, søgning og registrering med henblik på borgernes sikkerhed i urbane omgivelser).
I have been contacted by a constituent who has read about the INDECT project (Intelligent information system supporting observation, searching and detection for security of citizens in urban environment).
Han har læst, at hovedformålene med dette projekt er at udvikle en fremgangsmåde til registrering og udveksling af operationelle data, opsamling af multimedieindhold, intelligent bearbejdning af alle data, opsporing af trusler og registrering af unormal opførsel eller vold.
He has read that the main objectives of this project are to develop a policy for the registration and exchange of operational data, acquisition of multimedia content, smart processing of all data, detection of threats and understanding of abnormal behaviour or violence.
Kan Kommissionen stadfæste: 1.
Can the Commission confirm: 1.
den foreslåede pris for projektet, 2.
the proposed cost of the project; 2.
hvem der er ansvarlig for sikkerheden af dataene, 3.
who is responsible for security of the data; 3.
hvem der har adgang til dataene, når de er blevet sorteret, 4.
who can access the data once it is collated; 4.
på hvilken måde de, der er ansvarlige for projektet, skal stå til regnskab over for Parlamentet, 5.
in what way those responsible for the project are accountable to Parliament; 5.
hvilke restriktioner der findes, med hensyn til hvem der har adgang til dataene, når de er blevet indsamlet, 6.
what restrictions are in place on who can access the data once accumulated; 6.
hvilke forholdsregler der findes til at undgå manglende informationer, 7.
what provisions exist to prevent the leaking of information; 7.
hvordan universitetet i York har bidraget til projektet, 8.
what has been provided to the project by the University of York; 8.
hvilke foranstaltninger der er truffet for at sikre, at de overvågede personers privatliv respekteres?
What provisions are in place to guarantee the privacy of those monitored?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2187/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2187/10
Om: Administration af EU‑registret
Subject: Administration of .eu registry
Den private nonprofitorganisation EURid har været ansvarlig for forvaltningen af EU‑registret siden dets oprettelse.
The private not-for-profit organisation EURid has been in charge of administering the .eu registry since its inception.
Kan Kommissionen, set i lyset af de relevante EU‑forordninger, som EURid skal overholde i forbindelse med forvaltningen af EU‑registret, med sikkerhed bekræfte, at EURid virkelig også har holdt sig til EU‑forordningerne?
In the light of the relevant EU regulations which EURid is bound to observe in its administration of the .eu registry, can the Commission confirm whether it is confident that EURid has indeed been abiding by EU regulations?
Er Kommissionen overbevist om, at den baggrundskontrol, der foretages af EURid for at kontrollere, om en enhed er berettiget til at få tildelt et domæne, er fyldestgørende?
Is the Commission convinced that the background checks conducted by EURid to ascertain an entity's eligibility to acquire a domain are adequate?
Undersøger de grundigt nok, om en enhed er involveret i ulovlige aktiviteter?
Do they sufficiently detect whether entities are engaged in illegal activities?
Er Kommissionen ikke af den opfattelse, at det nuværende system med at anmelde en tvist via ADR‑systemet af økonomiske årsager afholder mindre enheder, der måske ønsker at finde en løsning, fra dette?
Does the Commission not consider that the current system of filing a dispute via the ADR mechanism is economically prohibitive for smaller entities that may wish to see a remedy?
Hvis dette er tilfældet, overvejer Kommissionen så muligheden af et system, der ville være mere overkommeligt for sådanne mindre enheder?
If so, does the Commission envisage the possibility of a system which would be less prohibitive for such smaller entities?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2188/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2188/10
Om: Gennemførelse af direktivet om minimumsforskrifter for sikkerhed og sundhed i forbindelse med arbejdsstedet
Subject: Implementation of the workplace directive
Især hvad angår beskyttelse af hotelansatte, oplærer alle medlemsstaterne på nuværende tidspunkt de ansatte i brugen af brandudstyr, risikovurdering og sikre evakueringsmetoder?
Specifically, concerning the protection of hotel employees, are all Member States now training employees in the use of fire equipment, risk assessment and safe evacuation techniques?
Hvordan overvåger Kommissionen gennemførelsen af direktivet?
How is the Commission monitoring the implementation of the directive?
Hvad vil Kommissionen gøre for at beskytte hotelansatte og -gæster, hvis medlemsstaterne ikke overholder de standarder, der er sat af direktivet?
If Member States are not meeting the standards set out by the directive, what action will the Commission take to protect employees and guests of hotels?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2189/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2189/10
Om: Brandsikkerhed for møbler
Subject: Fire safety of furniture
Planlægger Kommissionen at revidere brandsikkerhedsreglerne for møbler?
Is the Commission planning to revise the fire safety regulations for furniture?
Ville Kommissionen være villig til at gøre brug af nyere studier fra medlemsstaterne, f.eks. Frankrig, for at sikre en hurtig indførelse af materialer og standarder, som efter en revidering er blevet tilladt, for at undgå den forsinkelse, der kan opstå i forbindelse med et særskilt, videnskabeligt studie fra Kommissionens side?
In order to ensure a swift implementation of revised allowed materials and standards, would the Commission be willing to make use of recent studies from Member States, for example France, to avoid the delay occasioned by a separate scientific study by the Commission?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2190/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2190/10
Om: Direktivet om punktafgift og direktivet om harmonisering af strukturerne for punktafgifter på alkohol og alkoholholdige drikkevarer
Subject: The excise duty directive and the Structures directive
Hvad er Kommissionens vurdering af følgerne af at gøre det lovligt for medlemsstaterne at lægge forskellige punktafgifter på øl, der sælges på fad i modsætning til på flasker eller dåser?
What is the Commission’s assessment of the impact of allowing Member States to levy differential rates of excise duty for beer sold in draught as opposed to bottles or cans?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2191/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2191/10
På vegne af mine vælgere anmoder jeg Kommissionen om at sætte spørgsmålstegn ved, hvorfor EU ydede økonomisk bistand til Eritrea uden at stille krav om, at landet aktivt og påviseligt skal forbedre sin nuværende, drakoniske behandling af de kristne og deres menneskerettigheder, i medfør af hvilken de er udelukket fra landets liste over anerkendte religioner.
On behalf of my constituents, I ask the Commission to query why the EU provided financial aid to Eritrea without making it a condition that Eritrea must actively and demonstrably improve its current draconian human rights treatment of Christians excluded from its approved religions list?
Hvordan begrunder EU sin nuværende landspolitik, der klart står i modsætning til den vedtagne udenrigspolitik?
How does the EU justify its current country policy, which is clearly in conflict with the adopted foreign policy?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2192/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2192/10
Om: Kurderne i Syrien
Subject: Kurds in Syria
Jeg har fulgt de seneste begivenheder, der førte til mordet på tre kurdere i det kurdiske område i Syrien og ville gerne vide, hvordan Kommissionen har tænkt sig, at EU skal arbejde sammen med Syrien set i lyset af denne overtrædelse af kurdernes grundlæggende rettigheder.
I have been following the recent events involving the killing of three Kurds in the Kurdish area of Syria and would like to know how the Commission envisages the European Union working together with Syria to take account of these abuses of the basic rights of Kurds.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2193/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2193/10
Om: Timesharedirektiverne (direktiv 94/47/EF og direktiv 2008/122/EF)
Subject: Timeshare directives (Directive 94/47/EC and Directive 2008/122/EC)
Kan Kommissionen ligeledes oplyse, hvilke overvågningsprocesser der er iværksat for at sikre, at denne lovgivning gennemføres i medlemsstaterne?
Can the Commission also state what monitoring processes are in place to ensure this legislation is implemented by Member States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2194/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2194/10
Om: Grundkort af 1997 i forhold til artikel 17 i habitatdirektivet
Subject: 1997 baseline maps in relation to Article 17 of the Habitats Directive
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2195/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2195/10
Kan Kommissionen give et overblik over de procedurer, der anvendes til at forhandle om antipirattraktaten ACTA, de involverede parter, graden af gennemsigtighed samt de oplysninger, der er tilgængelige for Europa-Parlamentet og EU‑borgerne om dette emne?
Can the Commission outline the procedures that are being used to negotiate the Anti-Counterfeit Trade Agreement Treaty, the parties involved, the level of transparency and the information available on this matter to the European Parliament and European citizens?
Målet med ACTA-forhandlingerne, der blev indledt i 2008, er at opstille en international ramme til styrkelse af lovgivningen om håndhævelse af de intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder ved at hæve de internationale standarder for, hvordan man reagerer over for krænkelser i stor målestok af de intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder, som ofte finder sted fra kriminelle organisationers side.
The goal of the ACTA negotiations (launched in 2008) is to provide an international framework that improves the enforcement of intellectual property right (IPR) laws, by improving international standards as to how to act against large-scale infringements of IPR, often conducted by criminal organisations.
ACTA's nuværende forhandlingsparter er Australien, Canada, Den Europæiske Union, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Marokko, New Zealand, Singapore, Schweiz og USA, dvs. hovedsagelig »efterspørgselssiden«, for så vidt angår beskyttelse af de intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder.
The current negotiating parties of ACTA are Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the United States, i.e. mainly the ‘demand side’ of IPR protection.