natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Journalister uden Grænser har rapporteret, at 45 journalister på avisen Daily News og dens ugentlige tillæg i Zimbabwe er blevet indkaldt til et retsmøde ved retten i Harare den 12. oktober 2005, hvor de står anklaget for at krænke informationslovgivningen ved at have arbejdet uden officiel akkreditering mellem januar og september 2003, hvor avisen blev forbudt.
It has been reported by Reporters without Borders that 45 journalists on the Daily News and its weekly supplement in Zimbabwe have been summoned to appear on 12 October 2005 before a Harare court, to answer a charge of violating the information law by working without official accreditation between January and September 2003, the date on which the newspaper was banned.
I henhold til en presselov, som kaldes lov om aktindsigt og beskyttelse af privatlivets fred, skal journalister registreres af medie- og informationskommissionen, som angiveligt er under streng kontrol fra Zimbabwes regerings side.
Under a press law known as the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, journalists should be registered by the Media and Information Commission, which is reportedly tightly controlled by the government of Zimbabwe.
Er Rådet enig i, at presset på Zimbabwes regering skal øges med henblik på at få den til at stoppe sine angreb mod pressen?
Does the Council agree that pressure needs to be increased on the government of Zimbabwe to stop crackdowns against the Zimbabwean press?
Hvilke foranstaltninger kan Rådet træffe for at forbedre denne situation?
What action can the Council take to improve this situation?
(29. november 2005)
(29 November 2005)
Rådet har gennem årene løbende gjort Zimbabwes regering opmærksom på sin holdning ved hjælp af demarcher og erklæringer.
The Council has over the years continued to make its position known to the government of Zimbabwe through demarches and statements.
Rådet har vedtaget lovgivning med henblik på at standse det økonomiske samarbejde med landet, bortset fra fødevarehjælp og bistand til befolkningen.
It has adopted legislation stopping economic cooperation with the country, except for food aid and assistance to the population.
Det har indført et rejseforbud for de medlemmer af regeringen, der er ansvarlige for den nuværende situation og indefrosset deres aktiver.
It has introduced a travel ban against the people in the government responsible for the current situation and introduced a freeze of their assets.
Rådet har givet udtryk for sin bekymring på møder med den subregionale organisation SADC, som Zimbabwe er medlem af, og har drøftet spørgsmålet med Sydafrika under møder på alle niveauer.
The Council has expressed its concern in meetings with the subregional organisation SADC, which has Zimbabwe as a member and it has raised the matter with South Africa during meetings at all levels.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2556/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2556/05
Om: EFSA's uafhængighed
Subject: Independency of the EFSA
Som Kommissionen sikkert ved, skal risikoanalyser baseres på tilgængelig videnskabelige dokumentation og skal være uafhængige, objektive og gennemskuelige (artikel 6, stk. 2, i forordning (EF) nr. 178/2002 EFT L 31 af 1.2.2002, s. 1 . ).
As the Commission surely knows, risk assessment should be based on the available scientific evidence and undertaken in an independent, objective and transparent manner (Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p.
Et af medlemmerne af panelet har imidlertid meddelt, at han har en direkte økonomisk interesse i biotekindustrien, et andet medlem er medformand ved et arrangement sponsoreret af industrien, mens andre har optrådt i reklamevideoer for industrien.
However, one member of the Panel has declared a direct financial interest with the biotech industry, another member is the co-Chair of an event sponsored by the industry and others have appeared in promotional videos for the industry.
Endvidere anføres det i forordningens artikel 37, at medlemmerne af den videnskabelige komité skal erklære, om "de har visse direkte eller indirekte interesser, der kan anses for at berøre deres uafhængighed".
Moreover, Article 37 of the Regulation states that the scientists must declare ‘any direct or indirect interests which might be considered prejudicial to their independence’.
Der findes imidlertid nogle eksempler på, at nogle panelmedlemmer faktisk har interesser, som de ikke har oplyst om.
Yet there is evidence to show that some Panel members do indeed have interests that are not declared.
George Sakellaris var deltager ved forhandlingerne om protokollen om biosikkerhed under Forum for Public Research and Regulation, som er en organisation, der finansieres af GMO-industrien, og som faktisk går ind for at lempe lovgivningen om GMO'er.
Dr George Sakellaris attended the Biosafety Protocol negotiations in Montreal as the representative of the Forum for Public Research and Regulation — an organisation funded by the GMO industry that in fact champions weaker regulations on GMOs.
Han har heller ikke angivet i sin interesseerklæring, at han er medlem af denne organisation.
Again, there is nothing in his declaration to indicate that he is part of that organisation.
Kan Kommissionen garantere, at EFSA's medlemmer er uafhængige?
Can the Commission guarantee the independency of the EFSA's members?
Er Kommissionen enig i, at medlemsstaterne har ret til at vide, om de videnskabsmænd, der er uenige i deres holdninger, har en interessekonflikt?
Does the Commission agree that the Member States have every right to know if the scientists that are disagreeing with their views have a conflict of interests?
Hvordan kan Kommissionen sikre, at videnskabsmændene underretter om deres interesser, hvis de har sådanne?
How can the Commission ensure that the scientists declare any interests they may have?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2557/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2557/05
Om: Langsigtet indvirkning af GMO'er
Subject: Long-term effects of GMOs
EFSA's GMO-panel her imidlertid indtil videre ikke krævet, at GMO-industrien skal foretage nogen langsigtede undersøgelser af nogen af deres produkter.
However, to date, the EFSA GMO Panel has not required the GMO industry to do any long term tests of any of their products.
Den langsigtede indvirkning af at spise eller dyrke GM-fødevarer synes at blive ignoreret fuldstændigt af EFSA.
The long term effects of eating or growing GM foods seem to be completely ignored by the EFSA.
Ved Kommissionen, hvor mange langsigtede undersøgelser der findes globalt?
Does the Commission know how many long-term studies are being conducted in the world?
Mener Kommissionen, at langsigtede undersøgelser er nødvendige?
Does the Commission think that long-term studies are necessary?
Påtænker Kommissionen i lyset af de klare retlige krav i EU-lovgivningen at anmode GMO-industrien om at foretage langsigtede undersøgelser af GMO'er?
Considering the clear legal requirements under EU law, is the Commission thinking of calling on the GMO industry to perform long-term tests of GMOs?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2558/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2558/05
Om: Skoletaskers vægt
Subject: Weight of school bags
Den anførte, at en række undersøgelser var eller var ved at blive gennemført inden for rammerne af Fællesskabets forskningsprogrammer om muskel- og knoglelidelser, men at der var behov for yderligere forskning i den særlige risiko ved tunge skoletasker.
It indicated that a number of studies had been carried out or were underway in the context of Community research programmes on osteo-musculo disorders, but that further research was needed on the specific issue of the risks posed by heavy school bags.
Den antydede, at en sådan forskning kunne være berettiget til fællesskabsstøtte under programmet "Livskvalitet — kroniske og degenerative sygdomme".
It suggested that such research could be eligible for Community support under the ‘chronic and degenerative disorders’ facet of the programme ‘Quality of life’.
Vil Kommissionen meddele, om den i de mellemliggende fem år har finansieret forskning i dette emne, og hvilke konklusioner man da er nået frem til?
Could the Commission indicate whether, in the intervening five years, the Community has funded research on this specific topic.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2559/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2559/05
Under henvisning til svaret på min skriftlige forespørgsel E-2880/04 anmodes Kommissionen om at meddele, hvilke politiske initiativer Kommissionen har truffet eller overveje at træffe, ud over forslag til retsakter, for at følge op på henstilling 3-12 i Regionsudvalgets udtalelse af 14. juni 2000 om offentlig adgang i landdistrikterne?
Further to its answer to my written question E‑2880/04, what policy initiatives has the Commission taken or is it considering taking, other than draft legislative instruments, to follow-up recommendations 3-12 of the Opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 14 June 2000 on the accessibility of rural areas?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2560/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2560/05
Om: Meddelelse om mindstegarantier for socialsikring
Subject: Communication on minimum social protection
Hvilke fremskridt er der gjort med hensyn til Kommissionens løfte om at udarbejde en meddelelse om mekanismerne for mindstegarantierne for socialsikring?
What progress has been made as regards the Commission's commitment to bring forward a Communication on the mechanisms of minimum social protection guarantees?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2561/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2561/05
Om: Fællesskabsinitiativer om offentlig adgang i landdistrikterne
Subject: Community initiatives on the right to access rural areas
I Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 14. maj 2002 om turisme opfordrede det bl.a. Kommissionen til at udarbejde og evaluere de foranstaltninger, der er nødvendige for at sikre den offentlig adgang til større turiststeder (pkt. 19), og at identificere nye typer turisme (pkt. 29), ligesom det foreslog, at der skulle bruges fællesskabsmidler på at udvikle nye former for turisme, f.eks. landturisme.
The European Parliament resolution of 14 May 2002 on tourism called, among other things, on the Commission to assemble and evaluate the necessary measures to safeguard the accessibility of major tourist locations (paragraph 19); to identify new types of tourism (paragraph 29); and proposed that Community funds be used to develop new forms of tourism, such as rural tourism.
I lyset heraf og i fuld erkendelse af, at det er medlemsstaternes og de regionale og lokale myndigheders ansvar, vil Kommissionen da overveje initiativer, som kan "finde den rette balance" med hensyn til retten til adgang til landdistrikter, som omhandlet i min skriftlige forespørgsel E-2880/04 ?
In the context of those statements, and in full acknowledgement that this is the responsibility of the Member States and regional and local authorities, will the Commission consider any initiatives to ‘strike the right balance’ in relation to the right to access rural areas as discussed in my written question E‑2880/04?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2562/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2562/05
Under henvisning til sit svar af 17. maj 2005 på min skriftlige forespørgsel E-1022/05 bedes Kommissionen give sin vurdering af det svar, den modtog fra de irske myndigheder, hvori de beskrev de seneste foranstaltninger for styrkelse af kontrollen med ulovlig transport af affald i Irland?
Further to its answer of 17 May 2005 to my written question E‑1022/05, what is the Commission's assessment of the response it received from the Irish authorities outlining recent steps to strengthen enforcement efforts against illegal movements of waste in Ireland?
Hvis Kommissionen endnu ikke er nået til en konklusion i denne sag, hvornår forventer den da at gøre det?
If the Commission has not yet reached a conclusion on this matter, when does it expect to be in a position to do so?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2563/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2563/05
Om: Omkostningsgennemsigtighed og deponering af affald
Subject: Cost transparency and landfills
Kan Kommissionen beskrive de præcise krav i direktiv 2003/4/EF i denne henseende?
Could the Commission outline the precise requirements under Directive 2003/4/EC in this regard?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2564/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2564/05
Om: De sudanesiske myndigheders tilbageholdelse af medlemmer af Sudanese Social Development Organisation (SUDO)
Subject: Detention of members of the Sudanese Social Development Organisation (SUDO) by the Sudanese Authorities
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet for at sikre, at de medlemmer af Sudan Social Development Organisation (SUDO), som bliver tilbageholdt af de sudanesiske myndigheder, navnlig Saleh Mohammed Abdelrahman, som blev anholdt i januar 2005, Mohammed Musa Aldood, som blev anholdt i februar 2005, og Yousif Kabier, som blev anholdt i november 2004, løslades?
What action has the Commission taken to secure the release of members of the Sudan Social Development Organisation (SUDO) who have been detained by the Sudanese authorities, most notably Saleh Mohammed Abdelrahman, arrested in January 2005, Mohammed Musa Aldood, detained in February 2005, and Yousif Kabier, detained in November 2004?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2565/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2565/05
Om: Bortskaffelse af forurenet brydningsmateriale i de tidligere Tynagh-miner i Galway i Irland
Subject: Disposal of contaminated excavation material at the former Tynagh mines site in Galway in Ireland
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet eller agter Kommissionen at træffe i denne sag?
What action has the Commission taken or is it proposing to take in this matter?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2566/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2566/05
Om: Grønbog om økonomisk migration
Subject: Economic Migration Green Paper
Hvilken formel meddelelse har Kommissionen modtaget fra Irland som svar på sin anmodning om bemærkninger til grønbogen om en EU-metode til at styre økonomisk migration, som blev offentliggjort den 11. januar 2005 ( KOM(2004)0811 )?
What formal submission has the Commission received from Ireland in response to its request for comments on its Green Paper on an EU Approach to Managing Economic Migration, published on 11 January 2005 ( COM(2004)811 final)?
Hvad er Kommissionens tidsplan for opfølgning af grønbogen?
What is the Commission's timetable for following up this Green Paper?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2567/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2567/05
Blandt de emner, der skulle tages op, var forebyggelsen af kræft hos højrisikogrupper, og Kommissionen tilføjede, at dette bl.a. ville give mulighed for yderligere vurdering af forbindelse mellem øget risiko for kræft og endometriose.
Amongst the topics due to have been addressed was the prevention of cancer in high risk populations, adding that this call for proposals could allow, amongst other things, the further assessment of the links between increased risks of cancer and endometriosis.
Kan Kommissionen meddele, om den har modtaget nogen forslag om dette emne i forbindelse med indkaldelsen, og om nogen af disse blev tildelt støtte under det sjette rammeprogram?
Could the Commission indicate if any proposals on this topic were received as a result of this call for proposals and if any were awarded FP6 funding?
Kan Kommissionen i bekræftende fald beskrive det eller de støttede projekters hovedmål og meddele, hvornår resultaterne skal foreligge?
If so, could it outline the main objectives of the project(s) being funded and indicate when the results are due?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2568/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2568/05
Om: Ret til forældreorlov i den irske statsforvaltning
Subject: Entitlement to parental leave in the Irish Civil Service
Har Kommissionen rettet henvendelse herom til de irske myndigheder?
Has the Commission contacted the Irish authorities on these points?
I bekræftende fald, hvad har de svaret?
If so, what has been the response?
Vil Kommissionen beskrive den aktuelle situation med hensyn til retten til forældreorlov i den irske statsforvaltning?
Could it provide an update on the current situation with regard to the entitlement to parental leave in the Irish civil service?
Mener Kommissionen, at der i denne sag er grundlag for at træffe retlige foranstaltninger, og over Kommissionen da at træffe sådanne?
Does it believe legal action is warranted in this case and, if so, is it considering such action?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2569/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2569/05
Om: Vurderinger af indvirkningen på miljøet og adgang til klage og domstolsprøvelse
Subject: Environmental impact assessments and access to justice
Vil Kommissionen sætte navn på de medlemsstater, der ikke har givet meddelelse om gennemførelse af direktivet inden fristen den 25. juni 2005?
Could the Commission name those Member States which have not yet notified it of transposition of the Directive by the 25 June 2005 deadline?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe for at sikre, at dette direktiv gennemføres?
What action will the Commission take to ensure transposition of this legislation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2570/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2570/05
Om: ESPON-undersøgelse om forholdet mellem byer og landdistrikter i Europa
Subject: ESPON study on urban-rural relations in Europe
Under henvisning til sit svar på skriftlig forespørgsel E-2172/03 EUT C 33 E af 6.2.2004, s. 229. bedes Kommissionen oplyse, om den undersøgelse, den iværksatte i september 2002, om forholdet mellem byer og landdistrikter i Europa inden for rammerne af det europæiske observationsnet for fysisk og funktionel udvikling (ESPON), behandlede spørgsmålet om ret til adgang til landdistrikter?
Further to its answer to Written Question E-2172/01 OJ C 33 E, 6.2.2004, p.
I bekræftende fald, hvilke konklusioner nåede man frem til, og hvilke henstillinger blev der fremført?
229 . , could the Commission indicate if the study launched by it in September 2002 entitled ‘urban-rural relations in Europe’ under the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON) dealt with the issue of the right to access rural areas and, if so, what conclusions were reached and recommendations made?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2571/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2571/05
Om: Etablering af nationale håndhævelsesorganer med henblik på beskyttelse af luftfartspassagerers rettigheder
Subject: Establishment of national enforcement bodies to protect air passenger rights
Kommissionen har meddelt, at Irland og tre andre medlemsstater (Sverige, Luxembourg og Malta) den 4. maj 2005 endnu ikke havde givet meddelelse om etablering af nationale håndhævelsesorganer.
As of 4 May 2005, the Commission indicated that Ireland and three other Member States — Sweden, Luxembourg and Malta — had yet to notify if of the establishment of national enforcement bodies.
Vil Kommissionen bekræfte, at den allerede har indledt overtrædelsesprocedurer mod disse tre medlemsstater og beskrive deres reaktioner herpå?
Could the Commission confirm that it has already initiated infringement proceedings against these Member States and outline what their responses have been?
Hvordan har medlemsstaterne indtil videre reageret?
What has been the response of the Member States so far?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe for at sikre fuld og korrekt gennemførelse af forordningen?
What action will the Commission take to ensure the full and correct implementation of this Regulation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2572/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2572/05
Om: EU-kriterier for udviklingsbistand
Subject: EU development aid criteria
Under henvisning til Kommissionens svar på min forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-0039/05 bedes Kommissionen bekræfte, at kriterierne kun vil finde anvendelse på udviklingslande, som er omfattet af instrumentet til finansiering af udviklingssamarbejde og økonomisk samarbejde, som Kommissionen foreslog i forbindelse med de finansielle overslag for 2007-2013, og ikke på lande, som ville være omfattet af førtiltrædelses-, naboskabs- og partnerskabsinstrumenterne?
Further to its answer to my written question E‑0039/05, could the Commission confirm that development aid criteria would only apply to developing countries that are covered by the ‘Development Cooperation and Economic Cooperation’ instrument proposed by the Commission in the context of the 2007-13 Financial Perspective and not countries that would be covered by pre-accession, neighbourhood and partnership instruments?
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at kriterierne først træder i kraft, når det overordnede beløb er blevet fastlagt for en region, og at de derfor kun vil berøre fordelingen af midler inden for "regionerne" Asien, Latinamerika, Centralasien og Mellemøsten, som udgør ca. 30 % af Unionens bistand?
Could it confirm that the criteria would only take effect after a global amount had been decided for a region — in short that they would only affect the allocation of funds within the ‘regions’ of Asia, Latin America, Central Asia and the Middle East, which account for roughly 30 % of Union assistance?
Kan Kommissionen beskrive, hvordan der tages højde for hungersnød og fødevaresikkerhed i behovsindikatorerne?
Could it outline how hunger and food security issues are reflected by the needs indicators?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2573/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2573/05
af Francis Wurtz (GUE/NGL)
by Francis Wurtz (GUE/NGL)
Om: Fremtiden for Fordfabrikkerne i Blanquefort
Subject: Future of the Ford production site at Blanquefort
Siden 2001 har der i Ford Aquitaine Industries' virksomhedsråd været uvished om fremtiden for de ansatte på Fords og Gétrag Ford Transmissions fabrikker i Blanquefort.
Since 2001, the Ford Aquitaine Industries works committee has had no clear information as to the future of jobs at the Ford and Gétrag Ford Transmissions plants in Blanquefort.
Fords ledelse har besluttet, at fabrikken i Blanquefort fremover kun skal fremstille gearkasser med 5 gear, samtidig med at det amerikanske marked for gearkasser med 6 gear er under udvikling.
The Ford management decided that the Blanquefort plant would only produce five-gear gearboxes despite the fact the American market in six-gear models is currently expanding.
De to fabrikker i Blanquefort har som følge heraf oplevet en nedgang i produktionen.
The two plants at Blanquefort have therefore been faced with a fall in production.
Adskillige henvendelser fra virksomhedsrådet til de lokale, nationale og europæiske ledelser om planerne for fabrikkerne i Blanquefort med henblik på at sikre stillingerne og fabrikkerne har hidtil ikke affødt noget svar.
Despite the works committee's repeated appeals to the management at local, national and European level for information regarding future plans and developments on the Blanquefort site with a view to maintaining jobs and the site itself on a long-term basis, no response has been forthcoming.
De amerikanske, europæiske og lokale ledelser understreger imidlertid, at fabrikken i Blanquefort er den mest effektive i verden set i forhold til omkostninger, kvalitet, fleksibilitet, socialt miljø og reaktionsevne, og at den hidtil har klaret alle udfordringer inden for kort tid.
However, the American, European and local management maintain that the Blanquefort plant is the most successful in the world in terms of costs, quality, flexibility, industrial relations and reactivity and that it has always responded very rapidly to new challenges.
Hvilke foranstaltninger påtænker Kommissionen at træffe over for Fords europæiske ledelse for at få den til at orientere sit europæiske virksomhedsråd om fremtiden for fabrikkerne i Blanquefort?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to ensure that Ford's European management informs its European works council about the Blanquefort site's future?
Det forhold, at Kommissionen i begyndelsen af 2005 nedsatte en gruppe på højt plan for den europæiske bilindustri, "CARS 21 Competitive Automotive Regulatory for the 21st century" har kun styrket de ansattes usikkerhed og gør spørgsmålet så meget desto mere berettiget og påtrængende.
The fact that a high-level group on the European motor car industry, known as ‘CARS 21 Competitive Automotive Regulatory System for the 21st century’, was set up by the Commission at the beginning of 2005 has merely heightened workers' fears and made this request all the more justified and urgent.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2574/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2574/05
Om: Combined cycle kraftvarmeværk i Gissi, Italien
Subject: Combined-cycle power plant at Gissi in Italy