natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at de tyske bilproducenter (med undtagelse af Ford) hidtil næsten ubemærket af offentligheden og de berørte forbrugere har forkortet garantien på deres produkter fra 2 år til 6 måneder?
Is the Commission aware that, virtually unnoticed by the public and to the consumers affected, German car manufacturers (except Ford) have reduced the warranty period on their models from two years to six months?
Hvordan evaluerer Kommissionen det forhold, at kunderne i Tyskland efter seks måneder kun har en reklamationsret, mens tyske kunder i udlandet eller hos en EU-importør har den sædvanlige 2-årige (i USA endog 4-årige) fabriksgaranti.
How does the Commission view the fact that, after six months, customers in Germany are entitled only to a guarantee from an individual dealership or after‑sales service establishment, whereas German customers who purchase a vehicle abroad or through an EU importer are covered by the standard manufacturer’s two-year warranty (in the USA, it even runs for four years)?
Hvilke foranstaltninger træffer Kommissionen mod denne retlige diskriminering af bilkøbere i Tyskland?
What is the Commission doing to prevent car purchasers in Germany from being put at a disadvantage under the law?
Hvorledes vil Kommissionen endvidere imødegå denne nye handlemåde, der strider mod gruppefritagelsesforordningen, og ved hjælp af hvilken producenterne (gennem forringelse af garantien i Tyskland) søger at binde kunderne til en bestemt autoriseret forhandler/servicevirksomhed, der kun er »kulant« over for kunderne i forbindelse med reklamationsretten, hvis disse binder sig til dem for en længere periode?
What does the Commission intend to do about this course of action, which is in breach of the new motor vehicle block exemption regulation and whereby the manufacturer (through the abolition of the warranty in Germany) seeks to tie customers indirectly to a particular dealership or after‑sales service establishment, which then agrees to honour the warranty only if the customer makes a commitment to that dealership or establishment for the foreseeable future?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at der her er tale om en hindring for den frie distribution af biler på det indre marked?
Does the Commission view this as an obstacle to freedom of trade in motor vehicles in the internal market?
Som eneste bilkoncern forbyder BMW via en klausul i salgsbetingelserne sine kunder at videresælge nye vogne inden fire måneder efter modtagelsen.
BMW, the only car manufacturer to do so, prohibits its customers from selling on new cars within four months of delivery, a restriction laid down in a clause in the terms of sale.
Anser Kommissionen denne klausul for lovlig?
Does the Commission consider this clause acceptable?
Er der i henhold til den nye gruppefritagelsesforordning for motorkøretøjer ikke tale om en yderligere variant til hindring af den frie bevægelighed for varer?
On the basis of the new motor vehicle block exemption regulation, does this constitute yet another obstacle to the free movement of goods?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2111/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2111/04
af Marie-Line Reynaud (PSE)
by Marie-Line Reynaud (PSE)
Om: Anvendelse af fransk i EU-institutionerne
Subject: Use of French in the Community institutions
»Les sanglots longs des violons de l'automne blessent mon coeur d'une langueur monotone ...« (efterårsviolinernes langtrukne hulken fylder mit hjerte med en monoton længsel ...), det er med disse vidunderlige vers af Paul Verlaine, at Frankrigs befrielse begyndte.
‘Les sanglots longs des violons de l’automne blessent mon coeur d’une langueur monotone’ (the long sobs of autumn’s violins wound my heart with a monotonous languor) – it was with these magnificent lines by Paul Verlaine that the liberation of France began.
Jeg ønsker at takke vore befriere i dette mindeår, men jeg benytter ligeledes lejligheden til at tilkendegive min stigende foruroligelse over det franske sprogs langsomme og snigende forsvinden - det franske sprog, som er diplomatiets sprog par excellence - fra EU-institutionerne.
And while I wish to thank our liberators in this year of commemoration, I would also like to take the opportunity to voice my growing concern at the slow, insidious disappearance from the Community institutions of the French language – the language of diplomacy par excellence.
Imidlertid rummer det franske sprog ikke blot kulturens diversitet og nuancernes rigdom, men ligeledes historiens arv med menneske- og borgerrettighedserklæringen fra 1789 lige såvel som Jean Monnet og Robert Schumans erklæring, der var det første skridt hen imod et forenet Europa.
The French language embodies not only the diversity of a culture and a wealth of nuance, but also a historical heritage, with the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789 and the declaration by Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman that was the first step towards a united Europe.
Men værsgo, administrationen bevæger sig lige så stille, næsten umærkeligt, i retning af anvendelsen af et enkelt sprog i sit daglige arbejde.
And yet the administration is quietly, almost imperceptibly, drifting towards the use of a single language in its daily work.
Hvad agter Kommissionen at gøre for, at sikre, at anvendelsen af fransk i EU-institutionerne bekræftes igen, reelt respekteres og rent faktisk gennemføres i dagligdagen?
What does the Commission intend to do to ensure that the status of the French language in the Community institutions is reaffirmed and genuinely respected, and that French is actually used in the day‑to-day life of the institutions?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2112/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2112/04
Om: Udvikling af landdistrikterne
Subject: Rural development
Kommissionen har i sin politik for udvikling af landdistrikter sat sig en række målsætninger, bl.a.: —
The Commission is seeking to attain a number of goals in the area of rural development, including: —
rimelige og stabile indtægter for landbrugere —
ensuring fair and stable incomes for farmers; —
fremme af alternative beskæftigelsesmuligheder, der kan bremse flugten fra land til by samt udbygning af de økonomiske og sociale strukturer i landdistrikterne; —
developing complementary and alternative activities that generate employment, with a view to slowing the depopulation of the countryside and strengthening the economic and social fabric of rural areas; —
hensyntagen til de miljøpolitiske udfordringer.
ensuring that environmental issues are taken into account.
I EU's budget er der afsat ca. 2 mia. € (2003: ca. 1,9 mia. €) til miljøforanstaltninger i landbruget.
The EU budget includes around EUR 2000 million (2003: around EUR 1900 million) for agri‑environmental measures.
Kan Kommissionen giver et overblik, for EU-15 og Østrigs vedkommende, over, hvilke foranstaltninger der er blevet støttet med hvilke midler i 2003?
Can the Commission provide a summary for the 15 Member State EU and for Austria of what measures were taken in 2003 and what the volume of funding was?
Hvor mange penge blev der brugt til ekstensiveringsforanstaltninger (opdelt på de givne ekstensiveringsmetoder)?
How much money was used for extensification measures (broken down by type of extensification)?
Kommissionen planlægger en udbygning af de økonomiske og sociale strukturer i landdistrikterne med det formål at bremse op for flugten fra land til by.
The European Commission intends to strengthen the economic and social structure of rural areas in order to prevent the depopulation of the countryside.
Hvor megen støtte har Kommissionen investeret med henblik på at forbedre mulighederne for at nå landområderne med offentlige lokale transportmidler?
What level of funding has the Commission invested to make rural regions more accessible by public transport?
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommission truffet med henblik på at sikre hhv. forbedre de sociale og økonomiske strukturer?
What measures has the Commission taken to consolidate or to strengthen the social and economic structure of rural regions?
Hvor mange midler er der blevet afsat hertil?
What level of funding has been used to this end?
Hvor mange alternative arbejdspladser er der blevet oprettet?
How many complementary and alternative activities that generate employment have been created?
Kan Kommissionen give et overblik over udviklingen i landbrugernes indtægter i de sidste 10 år - gradueret efter den 1. tiendedel med den højeste indkomst, derefter med den 2. til 9. tiendedel med til slut den 10. tiendedel med den laveste indkomst?
Can the Commission provide a summary of trends in farmers’ incomes over the last 10 years — divided into ten groups in descending order with the highest earners in the first group and the lowest in the tenth?
Hvilken mål har Kommissionen sat sig for udviklingen i landdistrikterne for perioden 2007 til 2013, hvad angår oprettelse af alternative arbejdspladser og udbygning af de sociale og økonomiske strukturer?
What goals has the Commission established in terms of rural development in the period 2007 to 2013 with a view to creating complementary and alternative activities that generate employment and strengthening the economic and social structure of rural regions?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2113/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2113/04
Om: Udtalelse af kommissionsmedlem Frederik Bolkenstein om Tyrkiets tiltrædelse
Subject: Comments by Commissioner Bolkestein - Turkey's enlargement
Under en tale i anledning af indledningen af det akademiske år i Leiden (Nederlandene) udtalte kommissionsmedlem Bolkenstein sig meget kritisk om Tyrkiets tiltrædelse.
In a speech to mark the start of the academic year in Leiden in the Netherlands, Commissioner Frits Bolkestein made some very critical comments on Turkey's accession.
Han udtalte, at Tyrkiet må ændre sin identitet, hvis landet på et tidspunkt skal tiltræde EU.
He said that if Turkey eventually wants to join the EU, it will have to change its character.
Hvis Tyrkiet accepteres, må man også acceptere Ukraine og Belarus, mente han.
Whoever accepts Turkey must also accept Ukraine and Belarus, the Commissioner commented.
Desuden advarede han i sin tale mod islamisering af EU.
In addition, Commissioner Bolkestein warned in his speech of islamisation of the EU.
Endelig så kommissionsmedlem Bolkenstein meget pessimistisk på Unionens handlekraft.
Finally, the Commissioner was fairly pessimistic about the European Union's effectiveness.
Kan man gå ud fra, at Frederik Bolkenstein, der er medlem af Kommissionen og i denne egenskab var indbudt til Leiden, her gav udtryk for Den Europæiske Unions holdning?
Can it be taken that Commissioner Bolkestein, a Commissioner in office and invited in that capacity to Leiden, was expressing the position of the European Union?
Kan medlemmer af Kommissionen mere generelt ved officielle lejligheder tilkendegive deres private holdninger, når det giver indtryk af, at de taler på hele Kommissionens vegne?
More generally speaking, are Commissioners in office free to make their personal views known in connection with official matters, when this may give impression that they are speaking on behalf of the whole of the Commission?
Er der en adfærdskodeks på dette punkt?
Is there a deontological code on this?
Hvordan stiller Kommissionen sig mere generelt til perspektivet om tiltrædelsesforhandlinger med Ukraine og Belarus?
More generally speaking, what is the Commission's view of the prospects of accession negotiations with Ukraine and Belarus?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2116/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2116/04
Om: Anvendelse af Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 2151/2003 af 16. december 2003 om ændring af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 2195/2002
Subject: Implementation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2151/2003 of 16 December 2003 amending Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Anvendes denne forordning korrekt i alle medlemsstater?
Is this regulation being correctly applied in all Member States?
Hvilke beføjelser har Kommissionens Publikationskontor for at kontrollere, at denne forordning og bestemmelserne heri om CPV-koderne anvendes korrekt?
What responsibilities does the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities have in monitoring correct implementation of this regulation with regard to the CPV codes used?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2117/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2117/04
Om: Berufsverbot i Tyskland mod lærer Michael Csaszkóczy fra Heidelberg
Subject: Occupational ban in Germany against the Heidelberger teacher Michael Csaszkóczy
Hvorledes vurderer Kommissionen det berufsverbot, som Baden-Württembergs kulturminister, Schavan, har udstedt i Tyskland mod lærer Michael Csaszkóczy fra Heidelberg, som er aktiv i antifascistiske grupper og antikrigsbevægelsen?
What is the Commission’s opinion of the occupational ban pronounced by the Baden-Württemberg Minister for Education and the Arts Annette Schavan against the Heidelberg secondary school teacher Michael Csaszkóczy, who is an active member of anti-fascist groups and the anti-war movement?
Betragter Kommissionen dette som en krænkelse af forbudet mod forskelsbehandling og af det frie erhvervsvalg?
Does the Commission see this as a violation of anti-discrimination laws and the freedom to exercise a profession?
Er Kommissionen af samme opfattelse som EF-Domstolen i Luxembourg og Menneskerettighedsdomstolen i Strasbourg, nemlig at et forbud af denne art er ulovligt?
Does the Commission share the Luxembourg and Strasbourg courts’ opinion that occupational bans such as this are unlawful?
Hvad agter Kommissionen at gøre for at standse denne berufsverbotspraksis?
What action does the Commission intend to take, in its capacity as guardian of the treaties, against this practice of occupational bans?
Sagens baggrund: Siden årsskiftet 2003-04 har Kulturministeriet og Indenrigsministeriet i delstaten Baden-Württemberg genoptaget den tidligere praksis med at anvende berufsverbot.
By way of background: since the beginning of 2004 the Baden-Württemberg Ministry for Education and the Arts and Ministry of the Interior have been reviving the federal practice of occupational bans.
Skolelærer Michael Csaszkóczy blev nægtet ansættelse, fordi »der ikke er garanti for, at han til enhver tid går fuldt og helt ind for den frie og demokratiske grundorden«.
The Heidelberg secondary school teacher Michael Csaszkóczy was refused employment because he ‘does not guarantee always to be fully committed to the free democratic order’.
Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol erklærede i en dom fra 1995 berufsverbot for en krænkelse af menneskerettighederne.
In a 1995 judgment the European Court of Human Rights declared occupational bans to be a violation of human rights.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2118/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2118/04
Om: Udgifter til anlæg og brug af Attika-motorvejen
Subject: Cost of building and using the Attica Highway
For nylig meddelte det selskab, der forvalter Attika-motorvejen, med den græske regerings indforståelse, at vejafgiften ville blive forhøjet yderligere fra 2 EUR til 2,5 EUR.
Recently, the organisation managing the Attica Highway announced, with the agreement of the Greek Government, a further increase in road tolls from the current € 2 to € 2.50.
For denne vej er der ingen prisdifferentiering i forhold til den tilbagelagte strækning.
There is no differentiation in the cost of using this road according to distance travelled, which means that a user who travels 40 kilometres, for example, pays exactly the same amount as another user who covers only 3 kilometres.
Dette betyder, at en bruger, der f.eks. tilbagelægger 40 km på motorvejen, skal betale nøjagtigt samme afgift som en, der f.eks. kun kører 3 km ad samme vej.
In his answer to Question No.
I sit svar på forespørgsel E-3817/03 EUT C anfører kommissær Barnier, at »den koncessionsperiode, i hvilken kontrahenten kan anvende afgiften, er begrænset til 23 år, og at maksimumsafgiften for personbiler er fastsat til 1,56 EUR i juni 1994-priser.
E-3817/03 OJ C , Commissioner Barnier states that ‘the concession period when the contractor will apply the tolls is limited to 23 years and the maximum toll for passenger cars has been determined at € 1.56 in June 1994 prices.
Efter inflation svarer det i dag til en maksimumsafgift på ca. 3 EUR«.
After inflation, this equates today to a maximum toll of around € 3’.
Den græske presse har gentagne gange kaldt motorvejen »Europas dyreste vej«.
This road has been repeatedly described by the Greek press as ‘the most expensive in Europe’.
For få måneder siden (den 1. december 2003) blev afgiften forhøjet til 2 EUR for senere at stige til den nuværende sats på 2,5 EUR, medens Barniers svar indikerer en afgift på så meget som 3 EUR.
A few months ago (1 December 2003), the tolls were increased to € 2, only to be raised again to the present rate of € 2.50, while Mr Barnier's statement points towards another price hike to € 3.
Hvordan vurderer Kommissionen den manglende differentiering af prisen for brug af Attika-motorvejen i forhold til den tilbagelagte strækning?
What view does the Commission take of the flat-rate charge for using the Attica Highway irrespective of distance travelled?
Hvor meget kostede det i alt at anlægge Attika-motorvejen?
What was the overall cost of building the Attica Highway?
Hvor stor en del af omkostningerne medfinansierede Fællesskabet helt nøjagtigt (EFRU, det operationelle program for veje 1994-1999, transeuropæiske net (TEN), lån osv.)?
What was the exact level of Community co-financing (ERDF, operational programme for roads 1994-99, Trans-European Networks, loans etc.)?
Hvor stort et beløb og procentdel bidrog den private sektor med?
What was the exact amount and percentage contributed by the private sector?
Bestod dette bidrag af kontrahentens egenkapital, eller drejede det sig om lån fra Den Europæiske Investeringsbank, og hvem kautionerede herfor?
Is that contribution in the form of the concessionaire's own capital or is it a loan granted to him by the European Investment Bank and who stood as guarantor for the loan?
Vedrører denne medfinansiering udvidelse af Attika-motorvejen eller andre projekter og hvilke?
Is that co-financing in respect of extending the Attica Highway or any other projects and, if so, which?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2119/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2119/04
Om: Revision af Pakistans blasfemi-love
Subject: Review of Pakistan's blasphemy laws
Er Kommissionen opmærksom på, at Pakistans præsident, general Pervez Musharraf, for nylig har varslet en revision af landets blasfemi-love, som har været brugt til at nægte personer den grundlæggende menneskerettighed, religionsfrihed?
Is the Commission aware that Pakistan's President, General Pervez Musharraf, has recently announced a review of the country’s blasphemy laws, which have been used to deny the basic human right of freedom of religion?
Agter Kommissionen at tage dette spørgsmål op med den pakistanske regering og forsøge at øve indflydelse på udfaldet af en sådan revision med henblik på at forhindre, at kristne og andre religiøse grupper forfølges?
Is the Commission planning to raise this issue with the Pakistani Government and try and influence the outcome of the review so as to prevent the persecution of Christians and other religious groups?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2120/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2120/04
Er Kommission klar over, at dr. Than Nyein fortsat sidder fængslet i Myanmar?
Is the Commission aware of the continued imprisonment of Dr Than Nyein in Myanmar?
En lokal gruppe af Amnesty International i Croydon har givet mig et praj om hans skæbne.
A local Amnesty International group in Croydon has alerted me to his plight.
Imidlertid er han ikke blevet løsladt, og der er ikke givet nogen begrundelse for at han fortsat holdes tilbage i Insein-fængslet.
However, he has not been released, and no reason has been given for his continued detention at Insein Prison.
Han lider af svære problemer med hjerte, lunger og lever, og han behøver friske madvarer, hvilket man til stadighed nægter ham.
He is suffering from severe heart, lung and liver problems, and he needs fresh food, which he is currently being denied.
Vil Kommissionen påtage sig at rejse denne og mange andre samvittighedsfangers sag over for myndighederne i Myanmar?
Will the Commission undertake to raise this case and those of many other prisoners of conscience with the Myanmar authorities?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2121/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2121/04
Om: Fiskeri med drivgarn
Subject: Drift-net fishing
Kan Kommissionen klargøre sin holdning til brugen af drivgarn til fiskeri i EU-farvande?
Could the Commission clarify its position on the use of drift nets for fishing in EU waters?
En af mine vælgere blev for nylig under en sejlbådsferie ud for Italiens kyst viklet ind i et meget stort drivgarn, som han skønnede til at være omkring 5 kilometer langt.
A constituent of mine on a recent sailing holiday off the coast of Italy became tangled in a very large drift net, which he estimated to be around 5 kilometres long.
Under båden kunne min vælger se flokke af delfiner og store fisk, som var fanget i garnet.
Below the boat, my constituent could see shoals of dolphin and other large fish caught in the net.
Vil Kommissionen bekræfte, at den er tilfreds med den italienske regerings opretholdelse af forbuddet mod fiskeri med drivgarn?
Could the Commission confirm that it is satisfied that the Italian Government is enforcing the ban on drift-net fishing?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2122/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2122/04
af Willy Meyer Pleite (GUE/NGL)
by Willy Meyer Pleite (GUE/NGL)
Om: Direkte støtte fra EUGFL, Garantisektionen
Subject: Direct aid under the EAGGF Guarantee Section
Kan Kommissionen for hver af ordningerne for direkte støtte fra EUGFL, Garantisektionen, for de enkelte medlemsstater og for hvert af årene 2000, 2001 og 2002 oplyse det samlede støttebeløb for hver enkelt gruppe af modtagere, klassificeret efter kategori og ud fra støttebeløbet efter bedrift, antallet af bedrifter og hektar inden for hver kategori?
Can the Commission state, for each of the direct aid payments under the EAGGF Guarantee Section to each country each year (2000, 2001 and 2002), the total sum of aid for each group of beneficiaries, according to category, on the basis of the amount of aid received per holding and the number of holdings and hectares in each category?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-2123/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2123/04
Om: Præferenceordningerne for import og deres indvirkning på landbrugsmarkederne
Subject: Impact on agricultural markets of preferential import arrangements