natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Husker Kommissionen, at man ved indførelsen af euroen i slutningen af 1998 som betalingsmiddel ved overførsler og fra begyndelsen af 2002 også i form af pengesedler og mønter gik ud fra, at de stater, der deltager i denne fælles europæiske valuta, skulle være i stand til permanent at bringe deres årlige budgetunderskud og statsgæld ned under et loft, som man på forhånd havde fastsat i fællesskab, og også fremover skulle være i stand til at overholde dette loft?
Does the Commission recall that when the euro was introduced, at the end of 1998 as a currency for bank transfers and at the beginning of 2002 in the additional form of legal tender, it was assumed that the States participating in this European single currency would permanently be in a position to reduce their annual budget deficits and national debts below a ceiling jointly agreed in advance and then keep them there indefinitely?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at eksperter allerede tidligt i 2008, inden den internationale recession satte ind, udtalte forventningen om, at en række eurolande i de kommende år reelt ikke mere ville kunne opfylde forpligtelserne i stabilitetspagten med hensyn til disse lofter?
Is the Commission aware that in early 2008, before the international recession began, experts were already expressing the expectation that some euro countries would no longer reasonably be able to comply with the requirements of the Stability Pact with regard to these ceilings in the years ahead?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med de aktuelle forudsigelser med hensyn til euroen i krisetider, som kommer fra det amerikanske firma Hayman Advisors, der tidligere havde ret i sine forudsigelser om, at værdien af de amerikanske subprimelån ville falde?
Is the Commission aware of the current forecasts regarding the euro at a time of crisis by the American firm Hayman Advisors, which previously correctly predicted the fall in the value of US subprime mortgages?
Tager Kommissionen den mulighed i betragtning, at omstændighederne med hensyn til størrelsen af lån, budgetunderskud, inflation og arbejdsløshed i de forskellige EMU-medlemsstater vil komme til at adskille sig så meget, at det vil føre til, at ønsker med hensyn til statsstøtte, rentesatser, vekselkurser i forhold til andre valutaer og omgangen med de forpligtelser, som er beregnet til at holde euroens værdi oppe, vil gå i så forskellige retninger, at der kan opstå en tilstand, hvor det midlertidigt ikke vil være muligt at behandle euroen som en enhedsvaluta med samme værdi for alle deltagende medlemsstater?
Is the Commission reckoning with the possibility that the circumstances regarding the level of loans, budget deficits and rates of inflation and unemployment in the various EMU Member States may differ so much as to lead to different wishes regarding state aid, interest rates, rates of exchange with other currencies and the treatment of commitments intended to keep the value of the euro high, which could lead to a situation in which it is temporarily impossible to keep the euro as a single currency of equal value for all the Member States concerned?
Har Kommissionen, ECB og/eller medlemsstaterne planer for et nødscenarie, således at eventuelt opståede forskelle i euroens værdi i de enkelte medlemsstater ikke vil ske på en overilet og kaotisk måde (som det skete med den sovjetiske rubel i 1990'erne eller med den jugoslaviske dinar), men på en planmæssigt ordnet og omhyggeligt forberedt måde som ved adskillelsen af Den Tjekkiske Republik og Den Slovakiske Republik i 1993, hvor de gamle kroner i Slovakiet skulle forsynes med et påklæbet segl, der muliggjorde forskellige internationale vekselkurser?
Do the Commission, the ECB and/or Member States have an emergency scenario to ensure that any disparities in the value of the euro between Member States do not arise in any overhasty and chaotic way (as happened to the USSR's rouble or the Yugoslav dinar in the early 1990s) but in a planned, orderly and carefully prepared way, as in the case of the separation between the Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1993, when in Slovakia stamps had to be attached to old crowns in order to make a separate international exchange rate possible?
Er man parat til at styrke borgernes tillid til det finansielle system ved tidligt at forberede sådanne nødforanstaltninger i stedet for at vente, til det eventuelt viser sig nødvendigt?
Will the Commission promote public confidence in the financial system by preparing such emergency measures in sufficiently good time rather than waiting until they become necessary, if indeed they do?
Findes der en genopretningsplan, således at man efter ophøret af den finansielle og økonomiske krise igen kan forene euroer med en forskellige vekselkurs, som er afhængig af den deltagende stat, til en enhedsvaluta?
Does a recovery plan exist in order, after the financial and economic crisis, to reamalgamate euros which at the time have different rates of exchange in each participating State to form a single currency again?
Kilde (mht. Hayman Advisors): det nederlandske dagblad » De Volkskrant « , af den 28. februar 2009.
Source: (with regard to Hayman Advisors): De Volkskrant daily newspaper, 28 February 2009.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1580/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1580/09
Om: Nederlandsk støtte til dyrkning og eksport af blomster fra Gaza og afslutningen af dette projekt som følge af systematisk modarbejdelse af transporter over israelsk territorium
Subject: Support by the Dutch authorities for the cultivation and export of flowers from Gaza and termination of this project due to systematic obstruction of transport through Israeli territory
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at EU-medlemsstaten Nederlandene i de forløbne år har ydet støtte til blomsterdyrkning i kystområdet langs Middelhavet rundt om den palæstinensiske by Gaza med henblik på her at udvikle et eksportprodukt, som kan bidrage til skabelsen af permanente arbejdspladser og indtægter for dette stærkt plagede område, hvor der nu hersker masser af fortvivlelse og vold?
Is the Commission aware that in recent years the Netherlands — an EU Member State — has supported the cultivation of flowers in the coastal area along the Mediterranean Sea around the Palestinian city of Gaza, with the intention that this should yield a product for export which would permanently contribute to employment and income for this very poor area, which has become a breeding-ground for desperation and violence?
Er det Kommissionen bekendt, at der i slutningen af februar 2009 var 40 mio. nelliker klar til eksport og salg gennem blomsterauktionen i Aalsmeer i Nederlandene, men at denne eksport kun var mulig via israelsk territorium, fordi der stadig mangler den nødvendige havn og lufthavn i Gaza, men at brugen af denne rute blev umuliggjort, idet den israelske regering siden den 10. februar ikke mere har tilladt transporter gennem Israel, og at det ikke tyder på, at den har til hensigt at ophæve dette forbud?
Is the Commission aware that, at the end of February 2009, 40 million carnations were mature and ready for export via the flower auction in Aalsmeer, the Netherlands, but that, because the required port and airport were still not available in Gaza, it is currently only possible to export the flowers via Israeli territory, and that the use of this route is being rendered impossible because since 10 February the Israeli Government has ceased to permit any consignments to pass through and is showing no signs that it intends to permit them in future?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at den israelske regering håber at styrke sit berettigede krav om frigivelse af soldaten Gilad Shalit, der blev bortført i 2006, ved at forhindre enhver genåbning af grænserne til Gaza, men derved straffer andre end de ansvarlige for denne bortførelse?
Is the Commission aware that the Israeli Government hopes to lend force to its efforts to secure the — justified — release and return of Gilad Shalit, the soldier who was abducted in 2006, by preventing any reopening of the borders with Gaza, but that as a result it is punishing people who are not responsible for the abduction?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at det på nuværende tidspunkt ser ud til, at blomsterlageret i Gaza destrueres, og at blomsterdyrkning og dyrkning af andre afgrøder til eksport må indstilles?
Is the Commission aware that it now seems that the stocks of flowers in Gaza will be destroyed and that cultivation of flowers and other crops for export will have to be terminated?
Hvad foretager Kommissionen sig for at overbevise Israel om, at det ikke er i Israels interesse at bringe indbyggerne i Gaza i en tilstand, hvor deres elendighed tiltager, og deres problemer bliver uløselige, men at Israel derimod har interesse i at have naboer, som har fremtidsperspektiver og er i stand til at nå op på et indkomst- og vidensniveau, der svarer til Israels?
What will the Commission do to convince Israel that it is not in Israel's interests to aggravate the misery suffered by residents of Gaza and make their problems insoluble, and that on the contrary Israel has an interest in ensuring that its neighbours have prospects for the future and are able to attain a level of income and knowledge equivalent to that of Israel?
Støtter Kommissionen den nederlandske regerings bestræbelser på at få Israel til igen at medvirke til blomstereksporten?
Does the Commission support the efforts of the Netherlands Government to persuade Israel to permit the export of flowers again?
Hvordan gør man det, og hvilke resultater har man opnået?
How is it doing so, and with what results?
Hvilke foranstaltninger træffer Kommissionen for igen at få gang i de udviklingsprojekter, der går ud på at bygge en havn og lufthavn for Gaza, og som tidligere er blevet indstillet efter israelsk modstand, og hvad gøres der for at gennemføre disse projekter med succes, således at eksempelvis eksporten ikke længere skal være afhængig af et nabolands politiske kurs?
What will the Commission do to bring about a resumption and successful completion of the projects to develop a port and airport for Gaza, which were previously halted in the face of Israeli opposition, so that, inter alia , exports are no longer dependent on the political line adopted by a neighbouring country?
Kilde: Det nederlandske dagblad » De Volkskrant « , af 15. december 2008.
Source: De Volkskrant daily newspaper, 25 February 2009.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1581/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1581/09
Er det op til de enkelte medlemsstater at afgøre, hvilke tjenester der anses som ikkeøkonomiske af almen interesse og derfor er undtaget fra direktivet?
Is it a matter for the individual Member States to decide which services constitute non-economic services of general interest which are therefore exempt from the directive?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1584/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1584/09
Om: Intelligente transportsystemer og -tjenester
Subject: Intelligent Transport Systems and Services
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, om det er muligt at opnå støtte til mindre projekter i forbindelse med intelligente transportsystemer og -tjenester, og den bedes, i bekræftende fald, angive, hvilke programmer der findes for den type projekter?
Could the Commission indicate whether funding is available to support small scale Intelligent Transport Systems and Services projects and, if so, could it clarify the appropriate funding programme(s) for such projects?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1585/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1585/09
Om: EU-regler vedrørende opsigelse
Subject: European resignation rules
Efter min tidligere forespørgsel E-5828/08 om græsk skattelovgivning har en af mine vælgere ytret ønske om at få uddybet reglerne vedrørende opsigelse i EU.
Following my earlier Question E‑5828/08 on Greek tax demands, one of my constituents is seeking clarification rules regarding resignation in the European Union.
Min vælger, som er britisk statsborger, forfølges af det græske skattekontor i forbindelse med skatter og bøder, som han pålægges af en virksomhed, hvor han for flere år siden sagde sin stilling op.
My constituent, who is British, is being pursued by the Greek tax office for taxes and fines accrued by a company that he resigned from years earlier.
Jeg er blevet informeret om, at de græske myndigheder ikke anser hans opsigelse for at være gyldig.
I am informed that the Greek authorities are deeming his resignation invalid.
Min vælger oplyser mig om, at han forlod den græske virksomhed på samme måde, som havde han forladt en britisk virksomhed.
My constituent informs me that he left the Greek company in the same way as he would have resigned from a British enterprise.
Jeg er imidlertid blevet informeret om, at de græske myndigheder ikke vil anerkende hans opsigelse, idet den ikke var bekræftet af en notar.
However, I am informed that the Greek authorities will not recognise his resignation, as it was not notarised.
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte (i) om der eksisterer EU-lovgivning, som finder anvendelse i tilfælde af opsigelser fra private virksomheder, og (ii) om de græske myndigheder, i bekræftende fald, har overtrådt denne lovgivning ved at forfølge min vælger som følge af ikkebetalt skat, der havde hobet sig op i en virksomhed, hvor han havde sagt sin stilling op?
Could the Commission confirm (i) whether legislation exists at European level that applies to the recognition of resignations from private enterprises and (ii) if this legislation exists, whether the Greek authorities may be in breach thereof by pursuing my constituent for taxes accumulated by a company that he had resigned from?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1586/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1586/09
(13. marts 2009)
(13 March 2009)
Om: Fortsættelse af en gruppefritagelsesforordning for forsikringssektoren
Subject: Continuation of the Insurance Block Exemption Regulation
Gruppefritagelsesforordningen for forsikringssektoren giver fritagelse for anvendelse af konkurrencereglerne i forhold til visse typer af samarbejde inden for forsikringssektoren.
The Insurance Block Exemption Regulation grants an exemption to the application of competition rules in relation to certain types of cooperation in the insurance sector.
Dette inkluderer fælles beregninger, tabeller og undersøgelser, standardpolicebetingelser og modeller for overskud, fælles dækning af visse risikotyper (forsikringspooler) og sikkerhedsanordninger og -udstyr.
These include joint calculations, tables and studies, standard policy conditions and models on profits, common coverage of certain types of risks (pools) and security devices and safety equipment.
Disse former for samarbejde er vigtige for forsikringsindustrien og særligt for SMV'er.
These forms of cooperation are important to the insurance industry and particularly for SMEs.
Små og mellemstore virksomheder har hverken midler eller ressourcer til at udvikle deres egne standardpolicevilkår uden store omkostningsstigninger.
Small and medium‑sized enterprises do not have the means or resources to develop their own standard policy conditions without large increases in cost.
Tilstedeværelsen af standardpolicevilkår og fælles udregninger letter desuden adgangen til nye markeder og giver i sidste ende en reducering af omkostningerne og en forøgelse af produktudvalget for forbrugerne.
Furthermore, the existence of standard policy conditions and joint calculations facilitate entry into new markets, ultimately lowering costs and increasing product ranges for consumers.
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 5. juni 2008 ( P6_TA(2008)0261 ) om grønbogen om finansielle tjenesteydelser i detailleddet i det indre marked (2007/2287(INI)) »opfordrer Kommissionen til at støtte samarbejdet inden for forsikringsindustrien for at fremme markedsadgangen; opfordrer Kommissionen til at udvide forordning (EF) nr. 358/2003 til efter 2010«.
The European Parliament resolution of 5 June 2008 ( P6_TA(2008)0261 ) on the Green Paper on retail financial services in the single market (2007/2287(INI)) ‘Urges the Commission to support cooperation in the insurance industry on promoting market access; calls on the Commission to extend Regulation (EC) No 358/2003 beyond 2010’.
På en konference der fandt sted for nylig, gav Kommissionen dog indtryk af, at der ikke vil ske en forlængelse af forordningen, men lod muligheden for en delvis forlængelse stå åben.
However, the Commission, at a recent conference, indicated that there would not be a renewal of the regulation but left open the possibility of a partial renewal.
Tager Kommission Parlamentets opfordring til en udvidelse af forordningen til efter 2010 i betragtning ved udkastet til en rapport om forordningens fremtid?
Is the Commission taking the European Parliament’s call to extend the regulation beyond 2010 into consideration when drafting its report on the future of the regulation?
Overvejer Kommissionen alternative foranstaltninger for at sikre SMV'erne retssikkerhed, således at de nuværende former for samarbejde, både SMV'er imellem og mellem SMV'er og de store forsikringsselskaber, kan fortsætte, selvom de ikke falder ind under en ny forordning?
Is the Commission considering alternative measures in order to provide SMEs with legal certainty so that the current forms of cooperation, both between SMEs and between SMEs and larger insurers, can continue even if they did not come under a new regulation?
Etableringen af forsikringspooler giver forsikringsselskaberne mulighed for at mindske risikoen og dække »nye« risici.
The setting up of insurance pools permits insurers to mitigate the risk and to cover ‘new’ risks.
Overvejer Kommissionen alternative foranstaltninger for at sikre en fortsættelse af forsikringspoolerne?
Is the Commission considering alternative measures in order to ensure the continuation of insurance pools?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1587/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1587/09
Hvornår rejste Rådet sidst spørgsmålet om Kashmir med den indiske regering?
When did the Council last raise the Kashmiri issue with the Indian Government?
Hvilken strategi har Rådet for at løse denne langvarige konflikt?
What strategy does the Council have to help resolve this longstanding conflict?
Med dette taget i betragtning, hvilken kontakt har Rådet haft med repræsentanter for det kashmirske samfund?
With this in mind, what contact has the Council had with representatives of the Kashmiri community?
EU følger meget nøje forbindelserne mellem Indien og Pakistan og fastholder en aktiv interesse for udviklingen i både det indiskkontrollerede og det pakistanskkontrollerede Kashmir.
The EU follows very closely relations between India and Pakistan and maintains an active interest in developments in both Indian-administered and Pakistani-administered Kashmir.
Siden 1995 har der været en årlig EU-trojkamission til det indiskkontrollerede Kashmir, hvilket giver mulighed for at undersøge alle spørgsmål.
Since 1995, there has been an annual EU Troika Mission to Indian-administered Kashmir which is an opportunity to examine all issues.
Den seneste mission fandt sted den 2. marts 2009.
The most recent mission took place on 2 March 2009.
Rådet fortsætter med at tilskynde Indien og Pakistan til at løse Kashmirspørgsmålet under hensyntagen til befolkningen i Kashmirs ønsker.
The Council continues to encourage India and Pakistan to resolve the issue of Kashmir, taking into account the wishes of the Kashmiri people.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1588/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1588/09
Hvornår rejste Kommissionen sidst spørgsmålet om Kashmir med den indiske regering?
When did the Commission last raise the Kashmiri issue with the Indian Government?
Hvilken strategi har Kommissionen for at løse denne langvarige konflikt?
What strategy does the Commission have to help resolve this longstanding conflict?
Med dette taget i betragtning, hvilken kontakt har Kommissionen haft med repræsentanter for det kashmirske samfund?
With this in mind, what contact has the Commission had with representatives of the Kashmiri community?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1589/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1589/09
Pastor Fernando Kutino, som har siddet fængslet i Den Demokratiske Republik Congo siden 2006, er blevet idømt 10 års fængsel ved en genoptagelse af hans retssag.
Pastor Fernando Kutino, who has been imprisoned in the Democratic Republic of the Congo since 2006, has been sentenced to 10 years imprisonment at his retrial.
I Kommissionens svar på min forespørgsel E-210/08 af 14. maj 2008 anførte hr. Michel, at det blev drøftet, om en EU-delegation skulle overvåge genoptagelsen af Pastor Kutinos retssag.
In the Commission’s reply to me to Question E‑210/08, dated 14 May 2008, Mr Michel stated that it was being discussed whether an EU delegation would observe Pastor Kutino’s retrial.
Har en EU-delegation overvåget genoptagelsen?
Did an EU delegation observe the retrial?
Har delegationen haft betænkeligheder, hvad angår måden, hvorpå retssagen blev afholdt og dommene afsagt?
Did it have concerns at the manner in which the trial was held and the sentences passed?
Blev der gjort indsigelser under retssagen i henhold til EU's retningslinjer om brug af tortur på vegne af den medanklagede, Junior Nganda, der hævder, at hans vidneudsagn blev indhentet under tortur?
Were representations made during the trial under the EU Guidelines on the Use of Torture on behalf of the co-defendant, Junior Nganda, who claims that his testimony was obtained by torture?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1590/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1590/09
Om: Hormonforstyrrende kemikalier udledt af spildevandsbehandlingsanlæg
Subject: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) released by effluent treatment plants
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvorvidt den er bekendt med den forskning, der er foretaget af Brunel universitet i Det Forenede Kongerige, som viser, at hormonforstyrrende kemikalier, der udledes i floder af spildevandsbehandlingsanlæg, er årsag til alvorlige problemer for fiskebestanden ved at have skadelig indvirkning på hanfisks forplantningsorganer?
Can the Commission indicate whether or not it is aware of the research done by Brunel University in the UK which shows that EDCs released into river water by effluent treatment plants are causing severe problems with the fish population by adversely affecting male fish reproductive organs?
Hvis Kommissionen er bekendt med dette problem, kan den da oplyse, hvad den agter at gøre for at reducere mængden af hormonforstyrrende kemikalier, der udledes af spildevandsbehandlingsanlæg i floder?
If it is aware of this problem can the Commission indicate it intends to do to reduce the amount of EDCs released by effluent treatment plants into river water?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1591/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1591/09
Om: Gyldigheden af garanti på biler
Subject: Validity of car warranties
En vælger har over for mig klaget over, at et større bilfirma har nægtet at reparere hans bil under garantien, fordi det kun ville anerkende arbejde udført af et momsregistreret firma, der har brugt den oprindelige producents reservedele.
A constituent has complained to me that a major car company has refused to repair his car under warranty because it would only recognise work that had been done by a VAT-registered company which used the original manufacturer's spare parts.
Er dette korrekt?
Is this correct?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1592/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1592/09
Om: Biella og tekstilindustrien
Subject: Biella and the textile industry
I provinsen Biella forefindes et kvalitetsdistrikt for tekstilindustrien, hvor 1 000 virksomheder med 20 000 ansatte fremstiller 40 % af de kvalitetstekstiler, der sælges i hele verden.
The province of Biella has a district specialising in high-quality textiles, which, with 1 000 firms and 20 000 workers, produces 40 % of the fine fabrics sold all over the world.
Her fremstilles f.eks. astronautdragterne og det stof, der anvendes til at beklæde de nye sofaer i Det Hvide Hus.
This is the place where, for example, spacesuits are made, as are the exquisite coverings for the new sofas in the White House.
Dette område, som med god ret kan betragtes som Europas centrum for kvalitetstekstil, trues nu af den tyrkiske og især kinesiske illoyale konkurrence, som endnu ikke er tilstrækkeligt reguleret af EU-bestemmelser.
The Biella manufacturing centre, which can rightly be regarded as the European centre for fine-quality fabrics, has been placed in jeopardy by unfair Turkish and above all Chinese competition, which is still not properly regulated by Community legislation.