natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den Europæiske Union bestræber sig på at overholde og fremme de universelle menneskerettigheder, sådan som de er knæsat i verdenserklæringen om menneskerettigheder fra 1948 og i de internationale pagter, der er fulgt efter.
The European Union makes great efforts to respect and promote universal human rights as laid down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 and in the subsequent International Covenants.
Blandt disse rettigheder er tanke-, samvittigheds-, religions- og trosfrihed særlig vigtige.
Among these rights, particular importance is attached to the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief has particular importance.
Det var med dette for øje, EU-medlemsstaterne for nylig forhandlede sig frem til og med succes fremsatte en resolution om afskaffelse af enhver form for religiøs intolerance og diskrimination på grund af religion og tro på 61. møde i FN's Menneskerettighedskommission i Genève.
It was with this in mind that the Member States of the Union recently negotiated and successfully introduced a resolution on the elimination of all forms of religious intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief at the 61st session of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights in Geneva.
Det er også med dette for øje, EU og medlemsstaterne ved flere lejligheder i de seneste måneder har taget Hamid Pourmands sag og mere generelt spørgsmålet om religionsfrihed op med de iranske myndigheder.
It is also the reason why the EU and its Member States have repeatedly raised the case of Mr Pourmand and, more generally, the question of freedom of religion, with the Iranian authorities in recent months.
EU vil fortsat følge sagen nøje, herunder i samråd med medlemmer af det menighedssamfund, som Hamid Pourmand er medlem af.
The EU will continue to follow the matter closely, inter alia in consultation with fellow members of Mr Pourmand's congregation.
Der blev for nylig givet meddelelse om, at Hamid Pourmand blev frifundet den 28. maj.
It was recently learnt that Mr Pourmand was acquitted on 28 May.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1666/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1666/05
Om: Lemfældig udstedelse af visa fra en minister
Subject: Visas ‘dished out’ by a minister
De udtalelser, som en minister fra et af EU-landene har fremsat for et parlamentarisk undersøgelsesudvalg (mødet blev udsendt i tv i en ni timer lang udsendelse), og som drejer sig om den lemfældige procedure, hvormed almindelige indrejsevisa blev udstedt til tusinder af ukrainere, russere, belarussere samt borgere fra Moldavien og Georgien, afslører ikke blot en alvorlig lemfældighed og manglende ansvarsfølelse (som vi ikke kan gøre noget ved), men de giver også anledning til bekymring på grund af deres indvirkning på EU's indvandringspolitik.
The statements which a minister from one of the EU countries has made before a parliamentary committee of inquiry (whose proceedings were the subject of a nine-hour television broadcast) and which concern the ease with which standard entry visas have been issued to thousands of Ukrainians, Russians, Belarussians, Moldovans and Georgians not only reveal a serious lack of consideration and responsibility (which is not for us to remedy), they also give rise to concern on account of their implications for EU immigration policy.
Det er en kendt sag, at så snart lovlige indvandre har overskredet en grænse i EU, kan de bosætte sig i det land, de måtte ønske.
It is a known fact that once they have crossed a border into the EU, legal immigrants can move to and settle in the country of their choice.
Det er endvidere foruroligende, at de fleste af de visa, der er udstedt, stammer fra ministerens ambassade i Ukraine, som er hovedleverandør af folk involverede i organiseret kriminalitet.
Quite apart from anything else, it is worrying that the majority of the visas issued come from the minister's embassy in Ukraine, which is the main source of traffickers involved in organised crime.
Men på trods af at ambassader, konsulater, ministerier med ansvar for indre anliggender, politi, efterretningstjenester og domstole slog alarm, fortsatte disse lemfældige procedurer.
However, despite the alarm bells sounded by embassies, consulates, ministries responsible for internal affairs, the police, secret services and the judiciary, the excesses continue.
Hvad mener Kommissionen om spørgsmålet, og kan den fastslå, hvor mange af de berørte indvandrere der har bosat sig i andre EU-medlemsstater? 2.
Has the Commission any views on the matter and is it able to determine how many of the immigrants concerned have settled in other EU Member States?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at den medlemsstat, der med så stor lemfældighed har udstedt disse visa, bør anmodes om at efterprøve, om indrejsetilladelserne opfylder de sikkerhedskrav, der er fastlagt i EU-bestemmelserne?
Does the Commission not consider that the Member State which has issued visas so readily should be asked to check whether the entry permits meet the security requirements laid down in Community law?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1671/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1671/05
Om: Russisk olierørledning
Subject: Russian oil pipeline
Rusland besluttede den 31.12.2004 at konstruere en olierørledning fra Taishet i det østlige Sibirien til Perevoznayabugten ved det japanske hav.
On 31 December 2004, Russia decided to build an oil pipeline from Taishet in eastern Siberia to the Perevoznaya Bay on the Sea of Japan.
Rørledningen vil passere gennem vildtreservatet Barsovy og naturreservatet Kedrovaya.
The pipeline will cross the Barsovy wildlife refuge and the Kedrovaya nature reserve.
30 % af Ruslands truede dyrearter lever i disse områder, heriblandt Amur-tigeren og Amur-leoparden.
Some 30 % of Russia's threatened animal species live in these areas., including the Amur tiger and the Amur leopard.
Der eksisterer kun omkring 30 eksemplarer af Amur-leoparden i verden, hvilket gør den til et af verdens mest truede dyr.
There are only around 30 Amur leopards in the world, making it one of the world's most threatened animals.
Hvad har Kommissionen indtil nu gjort for at påvirke Rusland til at beskytte naturområder i forbindelse med konstruktionen af olierørledninger?
What has the Commission done to date to persuade Russia to protect natural areas in connection with the construction of oil pipelines?
Vil Kommissionen tage spørgsmålet om Taishet-Perevoznayarørledningen op med de russiske myndigheder?
Will the Commission take up the matter of the Taishet-Perevoznaya pipeline with the Russian authorities?
Hvad vil Kommissionen gøre for at sikre, at Rusland vil tage tilstrækkeligt hensyn til de naturfølsomme områder, olieledningen berører?
What will the Commission do to ensure that Russia takes sufficient account of the sensitive natural areas affected by the oil pipeline?
(29. juni 2005)
(29 June 2005)
Beslutningen om at anlægge en olierørledning fra Taishet i det østlige Sibirien til Perevoznayabugten ved Det Japanske Hav blev truffet den 31. december 2004.
The decision to build the pipeline between Taishet in eastern Siberia and Perevoznaya Bay on the Sea of Japan was taken on 31 December 2004.
Ifølge Kommissionens oplysninger er anlægsarbejdet endnu ikke påbegyndt.
According to the Commission’s information no construction work has started.
Kommissionen er klar over, at projektet kan have negative virkninger for bevaring og bæredygtig udnyttelse af den biologiske mangfoldighed.
The Commission is aware of the fact that the project might affect the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.
Rusland er part i konventionen om den biologiske mangfoldighed (CBD) og har underskrevet den paneuropæiske strategi for biologisk og landskabsmæssig mangfoldighed.
Russia is a party to the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) and has signed the pan‑European biological landscape diversity strategy.
Ifølge CDB har staterne dog suveræn ret til at udnytte deres egne miljøressourcer i henhold til deres egen miljøpolitik.
However, according to the CBD, States have the sovereign right to exploit their own environmental resources according to their own environmental policies.
Derfor er det Ruslands opgave at sikre, at negative indvirkninger på miljøet vil blive undgået eller begrænset mest muligt.
It is therefore a matter for Russia to ensure that negative effects on the environment will be avoided or adequately mitigated.
Kommissionen er parat til at behandle spørgsmålet om olierørledningen snarest belejligt.
The Commission is ready to address the issue of the pipeline at the earliest appropriate convenience.
Miljøspørgsmålet blev drøftet på topmødet mellem EU og Rusland, der fandt sted den 10. maj 2005.
Environment was addressed at the EU‑Russia summit held on 10 May 2005.
Som opfølgning vil et teknisk møde med miljøeksperter finde sted i den nærmeste fremtid.
In order to follow up, a technical meeting with environmental experts is planned to be held at the nearest opportunity.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1672/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1672/05
Om: Tyrkisk militær intervention og stabiliteten i Mellemøsten
Subject: Turkish military intervention and stability in the Middle East
I skriftlig forespørgsel E-0841/05 til Kommissionen bad jeg om at få oplyst, om Kommissionen under nogen omstændigheder vil tolerere tyrkisk militær intervention i Nordirak, og, såfremt dette ikke er tilfældet, hvilke konsekvenser en sådan intervention vil få for de optagelsesforhandlinger, EU ventes at indlede med Tyrkiet den 3. oktober 2005.
In my Written Question No E‑0841/05, I asked the Commission whether it would under any circumstances tolerate Turkish military intervention in northern Iraq and, if not, what consequences such intervention would have for the accession negotiations the EU is expected to begin with Turkey on 3 October 2005.
Jeg gjorde opmærksom på, at Tyrkiet ved flere lejligheder siden 1991 har invaderet Nordirak for at bekæmpe PKK.
I pointed out that Turkey had invaded northern Iraq on several occasions since 1991 to fight the PKK.
Jeg finder ikke, at Kommissionen har besvaret forespørgsel E-0841/05 tilfredsstillende.
I am not satisfied with the Commission's answer to Written Question No E‑0841/05.
Kan den derfor oplyse, om opfordringen til alle regionens lande om at afstå fra at træffe foranstaltninger, som kan føre til yderligere ustabilitet, betyder, at Kommissionen ikke vil acceptere tyrkisk militær intervention i Nordirak og, såfremt dette er tilfældet, endvidere oplyse, hvilke konsekvenser en sådan militær magtanvendelse vil få for de optagelsesforhandlinger, EU ventes at indlede med Tyrkiet i oktober 2005?
Can it, therefore, say whether its appeal to all countries of the region to refrain from actions that could lead to further instability means that the Commission will not accept Turkish military intervention in northern Iraq and, if so, will it also say what consequences such intervention would have for the accession negotiations the EU is expected to begin with Turkey on 3 October 2005?
(24. juni 2005)
(24 June 2005)
Kommissionen understreger på ny, at den i overensstemmelse med de konklusioner, som Rådet for Den Europæiske Union (almindelige anliggender) drog på sit møde den 21. februar 2005, arbejder tæt sammen med den tyrkiske regering om at støtte et sikkert, stabilt, forenet, velstående og demokratisk Irak, som samarbejder konstruktivt med sine naboer.
The Commission recalls that it is working closely with the Turkish Government to support a safe, stable, unified, prosperous and democratic Iraq that cooperates constructively with its neighbours, in line with the conclusions of the European Union (EU) General Affairs Council of 21 February 2005.
I fuld overensstemmelse med, hvad der gentagne gange er blevet fremhævet på møder på højt plan med de tyrkiske myndigheder, herunder ministertrojkaens møde den 7. marts 2005 i Ankara, er det Kommissionens faste overbevisning, at Tyrkiet til stadighed vil indtage en konstruktiv holdning til Irak, således som det f.eks. kom til udtryk ved landets afholdelse af konferencen mellem Iraks naboer sidst i april 2005 i Istanbul.
As repeatedly expressed at high level meetings with the Turkish authorities, including the ministerial troika held in Ankara on 7 March 2005, the Commission trusts that Turkey will remain committed to a constructive engagement with Iraq, as shown for example by its holding of the conference of Iraq's neighbours in Istanbul at the end of April 2005.
Udsigterne for, at der indledes tiltrædelsesforhandlinger med Tyrkiet, fremgår klart af Det Europæiske Råds konklusioner fra mødet den 17. december 2004.
The prospective for the opening of accession negotiations with Turkey was clearly set out in the conclusions of the European Council on 17 December 2004.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1673/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1673/05
Om: Human Rights Watch i Transsylvanien
Subject: Human rights watch in Transylvania
Det ungarske Nationalråd i Transsylvanien har offentliggjort sin første rapport om overholdelse af mindretals- og menneskerettigheder i Rumænien.
The Hungarian National Council in Transylvania has published the first minority and human rights watch report on Romania.
I denne rapport klarlægges den nuværende situation for mindretallene i Rumænien.
The report comments on the present position of minorities in Romania.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med denne rapport, og har Kommissionen inddraget denne i sin vurdering af overholdelsen af de politiske kriterier i Rumænien?
Is the Commission acquainted with the report, and is the Commission consulting it in order to assess Romania's observance of the political criteria?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1674/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1674/05
Om: Genopbygning af mindesmærker og kulturelle symboler
Subject: Restoration of monuments and cultural symbols
Agter den eventuelt at nedsætte en gruppe af eksperter, der skal udarbejde en liste over den europæiske kulturarvs mindesmærker og symboler i overensstemmelse med disses betydning for europæisk historie?
Will it examine the possibility of setting up a group of experts to draw up a list of monuments and symbols of the European heritage on the basis of their importance in European history?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1678/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1678/05
Om: Muligt traktatbrud i forbindelse med pensionerne fra Gibraltar
Subject: Possible infringement of the Treaty in the case of pensions paid in Gibraltar
På mødet den 16. marts 2005 vedtog kollegiet af kommissærer at sende en åbningsskrivelse til Det Forenede Kongerige på grundlag af den forskelsbehandling på grund af bopæl, som tidligere spanske arbejdstagere i Gibraltar udsættes for, idet de ikke modtager et tillæg til deres pensioner, som modtages af pensionister, der er bosiddende i Gibaraltar (den såkaldte Household Cost Allowance-ydelse).
At its meeting of 16 March 2005 the College of Commissioners decided to serve notice on the United Kingdom on account of the discrimination based on place of residence which is suffered by Spaniards who used to work in Gibraltar, since they do not receive the addition to their pensions (known as the household cost allowance) which is paid to pensioners resident in Gibraltar.
Dette initiativ fra Kommissionens side er en reaktion på forskellige klager og forespørgsler fra Parlamentet vedrørende dette spørgsmål med henvisning til, at myndighederne i Gibraltar i strid med traktaten udøver direkte diskrimination på grund af nationalitet.
The Commission's initiative is in response to the various complaints and petitions which the European Parliament has received on the subject, to the effect that the Gibraltar authorities are practising direct discrimination on nationality grounds (which is prohibited under the Treaty).
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvorledes det går med denne sag?
Would the Commission provide information concerning the state of play as regards this issue?
Er Kommissionen indstillet på at bringe Det Forenede Kongerige for Domstolen, hvis den ikke får en tilfredsstillende reaktion på sine henstillinger?
Is the Commission prepared to take the United Kingdom to the European Court of Justice if its recommendations are not acted upon satisfactorily?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1679/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1679/05
af Helmuth Markov (GUE/NGL)
by Helmuth Markov (GUE/NGL)
Om: Forløbet af forbundsmotorvej A 14
Subject: Route of the German motorway A14
Da der er reserveret en korridor til forbundsmotorvej A 14, vil FFH-område 325 »Krähenfuss« 3036-303 blive delt, således at den østlige del fremstår som et ølignende område.
As a result of the decision to keep a corridor for the German motorway A14 free, the FFH area 325 ‘Krähenfuß’ 0336-303 was split, leaving the eastern section completely isolated.
Dette delte FFH-område er blevet registreret og godkendt af EU.
FFH status for this divided area was requested and granted by the EU.
Hvad taler ifølge Rådet imod benyttelsen af særlige korridorer reserveret til A 14, og hvilke EU- krav skal være opfyldt for at kunne benytte korridorerne til A 14?
What arguments does the Council see for not using the corridor specifically set aside for the A14 or, to put it another way, what EU requirements would have to be met so that the corridor can be used for the A14?
Det samme ville gøre sig gældende, hvis vejstrækning W 3.1 eller W 3.2 blev valgt, i hvert tilfælde bliver det østlige ølignende FFH-område 325 »Krähenfuss« 3036-303 berørt på vest- eller østsiden.
Regardless of whether route W 3.1 or W 3.2 is chosen, the motorway will impinge on the isolated eastern section of FFH area 325 ‘Krähenfuß’ 3036-303, either on its western or its eastern side.
Hvilke faktiske omstændigheder eller krav skal være opfyldt for at kunne opnå en dispensation til byggeriet af en motorvej?
What circumstances must obtain, or what requirements must be met, in order for a derogation to be granted, clearing the way for authorisation for the construction of a motorway?
Hvordan kan et FFH-områdes — eller delområdes — status blive ophævet?
How can the granting of FFH status, even for only a section of the area concerned, be reversed?
Alene i betragtning af den aktuelle sag, hvor pligten til at forebygge larm og i særdeleshed svævestøv ikke er blevet opfyldt tilstrækkeligt ansvarligt, ser byen Wittenberge sig foranlediget til at undersøge det hensigtsmæssige i valget af en bynær linieføring (W 3.2).
The current accusations that it has failed in its duty of care to combat noise and, in particular, particulate pollution have in themselves been enough to prompt the municipality of Wittenberge to reconsider its preference for a route close to the town (W 3.2), as a result of which federal road B 189 would have to be diverted closer to the town towards residential areas which either exist already or for which final planning permission has been granted.
Det medfører, at hovedvej B 189, som går ind i byen i retning af eksisterende og planlagte beboelsesområder, også må omlægges.
Does the Council share the view that the route further away from the town (W 3.1), using the corridor specifically kept free for that purpose, is the more suitable option with a view to implementing the EC directive on assessing and combating ambient noise, including the resulting revision of the Federal Law on protection against emissions (BImSchG), and EU Directive 1999/30/EC OJ L 163, 26.6.1999, p.
Rådet minder det ærede parlamentsmedlem om, at EF-traktaten placerer ansvaret for at sikre, at medlemsstaterne opfylder deres pligt til at overholde EF-lovgivningen, hos Kommissionen.
The Council reminds the Honourable Parliamentarian that the EC Treaty allocates responsibility for ensuring that Member States meet their duty to comply with EC legislation to the Commission.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1680/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1680/05
Det medfører, at hovedvej B 189, som går ind i byen i retning af eksisterende og planlagte beboelsesområder, også må omlægges.
Does the Commission share the view that the route further away from the town (W 3.1), using the corridor specifically kept free for that purpose, is the more suitable option with a view to implementing the EC directive on assessing and combating ambient noise, including the resulting revision of the Federal Law on protection against emissions (BImSchG), and EU Directive 1999/30/EC OJ L 163, 26.6.1999, p.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1681/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1681/05
(12. maj 2005)
(12 May 2005)
Om: Farligt chrom i Attikas grundvand
Subject: Hazardous chromium in the groundwater in Attica
Ifølge artikler i den græske presse er der fundet store mængder chrom, et stof, der er farligt for den offentlige sundhed, i grundvandet i Koropi.
According to reports in the Greek press, large quantities of chromium, a substance which poses a danger to public health, have been detected in the groundwater at Koropi.
Boringsresultater offentliggjort af Laboratoriet for Miljøkemi, Afdelingen for Kemi ved Athens universitet, viser et stort indhold af hexavalent chrom Cr(VI) (143 μg/l) og chrom (166 μg/l) i vandet.
The results of sample drillings published by the laboratory for environmental chemistry in the chemistry department of Athens University show high levels of both hexavalent chromium — Cr(VI), 143 micrograms per litre — and total chromium — 166 micrograms per litre.
Indholdet af hexavalent chrom er altså tre gange så højt som den af EU fastlagte maksimumsgrænse på 50 μg/l.
This means that the level of chromium VI is three times the maximum permitted value laid down in the European Union (50 micrograms per litre).
For chrom findes der ikke nogen grænseværdi, eftersom selv meget små mængder anses for at være farlige.
No limit value has been set for total chromium, since even tiny amounts are considered dangerous.
Hvad agter Kommissionen at gøre for at bekæmpe problemet?
What steps will it take to tackle the problem?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1682/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1682/05
Om: Maltesisk afgift på kreditkort
Subject: Credit cards levy in Malta
I forbindelse med min skriftlige forespørgsel E-0690/05 gav Kommissionen ikke et fyldestgørende svar på mit oprindelige spørgsmål.
In its reply to my Parliamentary Question E‑0690/05, the Commission did not reply to my original question in full.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at denne afgift er for restriktiv, idet den i sidste ende holder de maltesiske borgere fra at foretage grænseoverskridende køb i det indre marked?
Does the Commission not consider this tax to be restrictive to the extent that it ultimately discourages Maltese consumers from effecting cross-border purchases within the internal market?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1683/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1683/05
Om: Compagnie Algérienne de Banque
Subject: Compagnie Algérienne de Banque
Den algeriske regering har udstedt et dekret, som beordrer alle offentlige institutioner, inklusive de statsejede banker, til udelukkende at deponere deres midler i statsejede banker.
A decree issued by the Algerian Government orders all public entities, including the state-owned banks, to deposit all their funds only with state-owned banks.
Det har fået Den Internationale Valutafond til at anmode Algeriet om at ophæve dekretet, stramme banktilsynet og støtte bankernes privatiseringsproces.
This has prompted the International Monetary Fund to request Algeria to cancel the decree, tighten banking supervision and support the privatisation process of banks.
CAB bekræfter, at de ikke kan opfylde deres kortfristede handelsrelaterede forpligtelser.
For their part, CAB are stating that they cannot meet their short-term trade-related external obligations.
De hævder, at deres konti hos Banque d’Algerie er blevet indefrosset, fordi statens pludselige indgreb har påvirket deres likviditet og sat dem i en situation, hvor de ikke har tilstrækkelige lovpligtige reserver i centralbanken.
They claim that their accounts at Banque d’Algérie have been frozen because the sudden action by the state entities has affected their liquidity and put them in a situation where they lack the necessary level of legal reserves at the Central Bank.
Derfor har virksomheden ikke de nødvendige midler til at gå ud på valutamarkedet for at opfylde de internationale forpligtelser.
Hence they do not have the essential alternative funding to access the foreign exchange market in order to settle their international obligations.