natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Siden har et stigende antal producenter indført denne mærkning, som har mødt stor opbakning og tilfredshed hos forbrugerne.
Since then, an increasing number of producers have adopted the label, which has met with great support and satisfaction on the part of their customers.
I 2003 blev denne mærkning endda indført på Den Italienske Republiks senatorers restaurant, med den daværende landbrugs‑ og skovbrugsministers godkendelse.
In 2003, that label was even introduced at the restaurant used by the Senators of the Italian Republic, with the approval of the Minister for Agriculture and Forestry at the time.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om den har kendskab til »Pianesis gennemskuelighedsmærke«, der objektivt set synes at være en ordning, som det betaler sig at benytte?
Could the Commission state whether it is aware of the ‘Pianesiana transparent label’, which would seem objectively to be a worthwhile scheme?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1498/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1498/08
Tre europæiske lande har indstillet salget af det aktive stof nimesulid, som mange smertestillende midler er baseret på.
Three European countries have suspended sales of the active principle nimesulide, which is the basis for a great many painkilling drugs.
Undersøgelser udført i Finland viser, at nimesulid har alvorlige bivirkninger for leveren, hvilket er årsagen til, at man har indstillet distributionen af det i Finland, Spanien og Irland.
Studies performed in Finland have indicated that nimesulide has serious effects on the liver, which is why Finland, Spain and Ireland have suspended its distribution.
Den irske lægemiddelstyrelse har anmodet Udvalget for Humanmedicinske Lægemidler (CHMP) under Det Europæiske Lægemiddelagentur (EMEA) om at begrænse brugen af stoffet til en daglig dosis på 100 mg to gange dagligt og har fuldstændigt forbudt brugen af det for patienter med leverinsufficiens.
The Irish Medicines Board has requested the EMEA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) to limit the use of the drug to a daily dosage of 100 mg twice daily, and has prohibited its use completely in patients with hepatic insufficiency.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med disse alvorlige bivirkninger for leveren?
Is the Commission aware of these serious effects on the liver system?
Burde den ikke gennemføre en dybtgående undersøgelse for at afklare, om dette lægemiddel faktisk ikke burde trækkes tilbage i hele Det Europæiske Fællesskab?
Should it not conduct an in-depth investigation to establish whether this medicinal product ought not, in fact, to be withdrawn throughout the European Community?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1499/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1499/08
Om: Nej til tunnelfloder
Subject: No to tunnel rivers
Der er fremsendt en plan til regionalregeringen i Emilia Romagna for oprettelsen af et vandkraftværk på omkring 1 000 m 2 og 18 meter i højden, hvor nogle strækninger af floderne Grondana, Nure, Gramizzola, Trebbia og Aveto — i alt 20 km — lukkes inde i tunneller.
A plan has been submitted to the Emilia Romagna regional government for the creation of a hydroelectric power station of around 1 000 m 2 and 18 metres in height, with the enclosure in tunnels of stretches of the rivers Grondana, Nure, Gramizzola, Trebbia and Aveto totalling 20 km.
Disse floder er af uvurderlig værdi for miljøet og turismen på grund af deres kemisk‑fysiske og biologiske karakteristika.
Those rivers are of unquestionable value to the environment and tourism, owing to their chemico-physical and biological characteristics.
Det er klart, at denne koncession på offentligt farvand gør uoprettelig skade på landdistrikterne og miljøet i Piacenza‑provinsen.
It is clear that this concession of what are public waters is irremediably damaging to the countryside and the environment in the province of Piacenza.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om: 1.
Can the Commission state whether: 1.
den har kendskab til dette projekt 2.
it knows of this project; 2.
den ikke mener, at dette projekt ingen økonomiske fordele har for indbyggerne i området, siden energien bliver solgt nationalt 3.
it does not view the project as being of no economic advantage to the inhabitants of the region, since the energy will be sold nationally; 3.
den ikke mener, at det ikke vil skabe nogen nye arbejdspladser, eftersom anlægget skal være fuldautomatisk 4.
it does not feel that since the facility is to be fully automated it will not generate any new jobs; 4.
den ikke opfatter dette projekt som uegnet, da Piacenza‑provinsen producerer ti gange mere energi, end den faktisk forbruger 5.
it does not consider this project to be unsuitable, since the province of Piacenza produces ten times more energy than it actually consumes; 5.
den er opmærksom på projektets indflydelse på miljøet, herunder den uoprettelige skade på Trebbia‑dalen, der er anerkendt som en af de smukkeste dale i Italien 6.
it is aware of the environmental impact of the project, including the irremediable damage to the Trebbia Valley, which is recognised as being one of most beautiful valleys in Italy; 6.
den vil give påbud om en inspektion til vurdering af projektets indflydelse på miljøet?
it will order an inspection to assess the environmental impact of the project?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1500/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1500/08
I Algeriet kontaktede kristne biskopper for nylig det såkaldte ministerium for religiøse anliggender angående det voksende antal deportationer af kristne fra Algeriet og domfældelser ved de algeriske domstole over kristne siden vedtagelsen af loven fra februar 2006 om religiøse minoriteters status.
In Algeria, Christian bishops recently contacted the so-called Ministry of Religious Affairs about the growing number of deportations of Christians from Algeria and convictions of Christians by Algerian courts since the adoption of the law of February 2006 governing the status of religious minorities.
Officielt er hensigten med loven at garantere »tolerance og respekt blandt de forskellige religioner«.
Officially, this law is intended to guarantee ‘tolerance and respect among the various religions’.
I praksis krænker diverse bestemmelser religionsfriheden grundlæggende.
In practice, various provisions fundamentally violate freedom of religion.
F.eks. giver loven fængselsstraffe på fem år og bøder på ca. 10 000 EUR for »tilskyndelse til eller brug af lokkemidler til at anspore en muslim til at konvertere til en anden religion«.
For example, the law provides for prison sentences of five years and fines of approximately EUR 10 000 for ‘incitement to or use of means of seduction to encourage a Muslim to convert to another religion’.
Denne lovs undertrykkende karakter illustreres særligt ved, at repræsentanter fra forsvarsministeriet, indenrigsministeriet, politiet og gendarmeriet er medlemmer af det udvalg, der har til opgave at »at sikre frihed til religionsudøvelse« (Arezki Aït-Larbi, »Les chrétiens pourchassés en Algérie« (kristne forfulgt i Algeriet), Le Figaro.fr, 25. februar 2008).
It is particularly illustrative of the repressive character of this law that representatives of the Ministry of National Defence, the Ministry of the Interior, the police and the gendarmerie sit on the commission whose remit is to ‘safeguard freedom of religious practice’ (Arezki Aït-Larbi, ‘Les chrétiens pourchassés en Algérie’ (Christians hounded in Algeria), Le Figaro.fr, 25 February 2008).
I artikel 104, stk. 2, bestemmes det, at finder en part, at den anden part har tilsidesat en forpligtelse i henhold til aftalen, kan den træffe passende foranstaltninger.
Article 104(2) lays down that if either Party considers that the other Party has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Agreement, it may take appropriate measures.
Forud herfor fremsendes alle nødvendige oplysninger til Associeringsrådet, der kan undersøge, om der er en løsning, der er acceptabel for alle parter.
Before so doing, information is to be supplied to the Association Council, which can investigate whether there is any solution acceptable to all parties.
Krænker de relevante bestemmelser i ovennævnte lov og sammensætningen af ovennævnte udvalg efter Kommissionens mening klausulen om et »væsentligt element« i artikel 2?
In the Commission's opinion, do the relevant provisions of the above law and the composition of the abovementioned commission violate the ‘essential element’ clause in Article 2?
Vil Kommissionen i lyset af sine overvågningsforpligtelser i henhold til artikel 2 kontakte repræsentanter fra det kristne mindretal i Algeriet?
In view of the Commission's monitoring obligations pursuant to Article 2, will the Commission contact representatives of the Christian minority in Algeria?
Hvilke skridt agter Kommissionen at tage i tilknytning til artikel 104, stk. 2, og den politiske dialog, som er fastsat i aftalen?
What steps will the Commission take in connection with Article 104(2) and with the political dialogue for which the Agreement provides?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1503/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1503/08
Om: Lissabontraktaten — Artikel 7 — Suspension af visse rettigheder, der følger af medlemskab af Unionen
Subject: Lisbon Treaty — Article 7 — Suspension of certain rights deriving from Union membership
Vil Rådet afgrænse begrebet »groft og vedvarende«?
Will the Council define the term ‘serious and persistent’ more precisely?
Vil Rådet afgrænse begrebet »visse af de rettigheder«?
Will the Council define the concept of ‘certain of the rights’ more precisely?
Skriftlige forespørgsler : E-1503/08 , E-1504/08 , E-1505/08 , E-1506/08 , E-1507/08 , E-1508/08 , E-1509/08 , E-1510/08
Written questions : E-1503/08 , E-1504/08 , E-1505/08 , E-1506/08 , E-1507/08 , E-1508/08 , E-1509/08 , E-1510/08
Rådet ikke deltog i den regeringskonference, der udarbejdede Lissabontraktaten
the Council was not involved in the Intergovernmental Conference that drafted the Lisbon Treaty;
Lissabontraktaten skal fortolkes af Domstolen, når den er trådt i kraft.
once the Lisbon Treaty has entered into force, it will have to be interpreted by the Court of Justice.
For så vidt det første spørgsmål i forespørgsel E‑1507/­08 vedrører situationen i henhold til den gældende lovgivning, vil Rådet gerne understrege, at for så vidt angår dets rolle i lovgivningen er det kun selve Rådet, og ikke dets forberedende organer, der træffer afgørelse om lovgivning.
To the extent that the first issue covered by Question E‑1507/08 relates to the situation under current law, the Council would stress that, as far as its role in legislation is concerned, it is only the Council itself, and not its preparatory bodies, that decides on legislation.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1504/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1504/08
Om: Lissabontraktaten — Artikel 9 — Princippet om demokratisk lighed
Subject: Lisbon Treaty — Article 9 — Principle of democratic equality
Kan lighedsprincippet begrunde en indskrænkende fortolkning af den danske sommerhusprotokol?
Can the principle of equality justify a restrictive interpretation of the Danish summerhouse protocol?
Hvem har ansvaret for, at udtrykket »additional citizenship« ikke er medtaget i den danske udgave af Lissabontraktaten?
Who is responsible for the omission from the Danish version of the Treaty of Lisbon of the phrase ‘additional citizenship’?
Hvilke lande virkede for den nye formulering?
Which countries were in favour of the new wording?
Hvilke bemærkninger fremførtes af de danske repræsentanter på regeringskonferencen og/­eller i et af de forberedende møder?
What observations were made by the Danish representatives at the Intergovernmental Conference and/or the various preparatory meetings?
Hvilket statsborgerskab har forrang, hvis der måtte opstå en konflikt mellem EU's borgerskab og det danske statsborgerskab?
In case of conflict between Union citizenship and Danish nationality which takes precedence?
Hvorfor er »citizenship« ikke oversat til statsborgerskab i den danske udgave?
Why is the English word ‘citizenship’ not translated by ‘statsborgerskab’ in the Danish version?
I hvilke sproglige udgaver tales om et »unionsborgerskab« uden anvendelse af det for landet sædvanlige statsborgerskabs begreb?
Which language versions use the term ‘Union citizenship’ without using the term for nationality generally applicable in the country concerned?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1505/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1505/08
Om: Lissabontraktaten — Artikel 10 — Princippet om repræsentativt demokrati
Subject: Lisbon Treaty — Article 10 — Principle of representative democracy
Kan bestemmelser vedtaget i strid med dette princip anses for ulovlige?
Can provisions which violate this principle be regarded as unlawful?
Er der nogen retsvirkninger af den nye formulering i forhold til Nicetraktaten?
Does the new version of the Treaty have legal effect vis-à-vis the Treaty of Nice?
Kan lovbestemmelser anses for ulovlige, hvis de ikke er vedtaget åbent?
Can legal provisions be regarded as unlawful if they are not ‘taken openly’?
Kan et parti erklæres ulovligt eller udelukkes fra tilskud, hvis det ikke bidrager til at skabe europæisk bevidsthed eller f.eks. kun udtrykker visse unionsborgeres vilje?
Can a party be declared to be in breach of the law or be denied subsidies if it does not contribute to forming European political awareness or, for example, if it expresses the will of only certain Union citizens?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1506/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1506/08
Om: Lissabontraktaten — Artikel 11 — Princippet om deltagelsesdemokrati
Subject: Lisbon Treaty - Article 11 - Principle of participatory democracy
Vil en million underskrifter for folkeafstemning om Lissabontraktaten gøre nogen forskel?
Will a million signatures in favour of a referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon have any influence whatsoever?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1507/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1507/08
Om: Lissabontraktaten — Artikel 12C — De nationale parlamenters rolle
Subject: Lisbon Treaty — Article 12 — Role of the national parliaments
Kan de nationale parlamenter få adgang til lovgivningsmæssige dokumenter fra Rådets omkring 300 arbejdsgrupper, hvor hovedparten af EU's regler de facto besluttes?
Is it possible for the national parliaments to have access to the legislative documents of the approximately 300 Council working groups in which most EU rules are in practice decided on?
Hvordan kan de sikre overholdelse af principperne, når kun 55 % af regeringerne kan blokere lovforslag for brud på subsidiaritetsprincippet?
How can they ensure compliance with the relevant principles, given that a legislative proposal can be blocked by only 55 % of the governments on the grounds that the principle of subsidiarity has not been respected?
Kan de nationale parlamenter få adgang til alle arbejdsdokumenter og mødereferater fra regeringskonferencen om Lissabontraktaten?
Is it possible for the national parliaments to have access to all working documents and sets of minutes relating to the Intergovernmental Conference on the Treaty of Lisbon?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1508/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1508/08
Om: Lissabontraktaten — Artikel 13 — Unionens institutioner
Subject: Lisbon Treaty — Article 13 — The institutions of the Union
Vil Rådet afgrænse begrebet »medlemsstaternes interesser«?
Will the Council define the term ‘interests of the Member States’ more precisely?
Vil Rådet opregne pligter under loyalitetsprincippet?
Will the Council list the requirements inherent in the principle of sincere cooperation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1509/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1509/08
Om: Lissabontraktaten — Artikel 14 — Europa-Parlamentet
Subject: Lisbon Treaty - Article 14 - European Parliament
Kan Europa-Parlamentet vælge andre end den, som er foreslået af 20 af 27 stats‑ og regeringschefer?
Can the European Parliament [elect as President of the Commission] someone other than the person proposed by 20 of the 27 Heads of State and Government?
Da Danmark blev medlem af EF, havde Tyskland 3½ gang vore pladser i Europa‑Parlamentet.
When Denmark joined the EC, Germany had three-and-a-half times as many seats in the European Parliament as Denmark.
Nu får de 8 gange vore pladser.
Now it has eight times as many.
Hvad har Danmark sagt på regeringskonferencen om antallet af pladser?
What stance did Denmark adopt at the Intergovernmental Conference regarding the number of seats?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1510/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1510/08
Om: Lissabontraktaten — Artikel 15 — Det Europæiske Råd og dets formand
Subject: Lisbon Treaty - Article 15 - the European Council and its President
Er Kommissionens formand medlem af Det Europæiske Råd eller observatør uden stemmeret?
Is the President of the Commission a member of the European Council or an observer without the right to vote?
Hvilke lande har afvist at skrive enstemmighed i stedet for konsensus?
Which countries rejected the principle of unanimous rather than consensus decision-making?
Er konsensus altid enstemmighed?
Does consensus always equate to unanimity?
Kan Det Europæiske Råds formand få efterløn og pension fra hjemlandet samtidig med aflønningen i EU?
Can the President of the European Council continue to receive salary or pension payments from his or her home country at the same time as his or her EU emoluments?
Vil lønnen blive fastsat som Kommissionens formands løn eller være større eller mindre?
Is the level of his or her emoluments the same as for the President of the Commission, or is it higher or lower?
Vil funktionen være underlagt finansforordningen og tjenestemandsvedtægten?
Is the office of President of the European Council covered by the Financial Regulation and the Staff Regulations?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1511/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1511/08
Om: Illegal skovhugst i Ungarn
Subject: Illegal tree-felling in Hungary
Omfanget af trætyveriet i Ungarn bliver stadig større.
The amount of wood being stolen in Hungary is becoming ever more serious.
Ifølge forstvirksomheden Egererdö Zrt. beløber skaderne sig efterhånden til adskillige titusinde euro om året.
According to the forestry business Egererdö Zrt. the amount of money being lost each year already amounts to tens of thousands of euros.
Derudover anretter den illegale skovhugst skader på økosystemet og miljøet, som der ikke kan sættes tal på.
Furthermore, illegal lumbering is causing immeasurable damage to the ecosystem and the environment.
Hårdest ramt er regionerne omkring özd og Arlö.
The worst affected areas are Ózd and Arló.
Den kendsgerning, at bevæggrundene for tyveriet har ændret sig, er foruroligende.
It is particularly worrying that the reasons behind the theft of timber have changed.
Tidligere stjal individuelle gerningsmænd træ af sociale årsager.
In previous years wood was stolen as a result of the social circumstances of individual offenders.
Men nu er gerningsmændene ifølge virksomhedsleder Lászlö Pallagi meget veludstyrede, organiserede grupper.
According to the manager of the above business, László Pallagi, offenders now belong to very well equipped and organised groups.
Han kræver derfor strengere regler og et bedre samarbejde mellem myndighederne.
He is therefore calling for stricter regulations and better cooperation between public authorities.
Skovfogeder har hidtil kun kunnet kontrollere legitimation og anmelde mistænkelige personer, men ikke undersøge lastvogne på offentlig vej eller privat grund.
At present, foresters are only allowed to carry out identity checks and report suspects, but are not allowed to stop lorries on public roads or search private property.
Desuden er de 120 skovfogeder for få til at kunne kontrollere de 74 000 hektar skov.
Furthermore, there are only 120 foresters and they are clearly not in a position to check the 74 000 hectares of forest.
90 % af de mennesker, der køber billigt, stjålet træ, kender til træets oprindelse, men køber det alligevel.
Some 90 % of people who buy low-priced, stolen wood know where it came from, yet buy it all the same.
Er Kommissionen vidende herom, og hvordan vurderer den situationen?
Is the Commission aware of the situation and what is its assessment of it?
Agter Kommissionen at foretage sig noget vedrørende denne problematik?
Does the Commission plan to do anything regarding the problem?
Hvis dette er tilfældet, hvordan ser disse planer ud?
If so, what are its plans?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1512/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1512/08
Om: Luftfartens brændstoftillæg
Subject: Fuel surcharges in the aviation industry
Stadig flere flyselskaber indgår aftaler, så de kan opkræve ukontrollerede, overdrevne og permanente tillæg af kunderne.
More and more airlines are making arrangements between themselves so as to allow them to demand uncontrolled, overinflated and permanent surcharges from customers.
Disse tillæg forvrider, om ikke ligefrem ødelægger, den grundlæggende konkurrence.
This then distorts or potentially even destroys competition.
For det meste begrundes tillæggene med, at brændstofpriserne er steget, hvorimod faldende brændstofpriser sjældent resulterer i tilsvarende nedslag.
Most of these surcharges are justified by the increased price of fuel; however, there is rarely a noticeable reduction in cost when fuel prices decrease.
Men det er påfaldende, at flyselskaberne i forbindelse med særpriser i reklamefremstød ikke pålægger kunderne at betale de ekstraomkostninger, som flyselskaberne uforskyldt har pga. stigende brændstofpriser.
It is, however, striking that the alleged transfer of the increased price of fuel is not brought up when it comes to special promotional prices and offers.
Man kan her få den mistanke, at der via pristillæg på de almindelige billetter sker en slags intern økonomisk kompensering for specialtilbuddene.
This strongly suggests that the price surcharges on standard offers are a form of internal financial compensation for the special offers.
I den forbindelse skal der endnu engang gøres opmærksom på den kollektive sag i Storbritannien og USA, hvor British Airways og Virgin skal betale to til ti britiske pund pr. passager på grund af prisaftaler.
Once again, reference should be made to the class action in Great Britain and the USA, where British Airways and Virgin will have to pay between two and ten pounds sterling for each passenger because of price fixing.
Derudover snydes forbrugerne fortsat, ved at der blot oplyses om vildledende nettopriser i begyndelsen af en bookning.
Furthermore, consumers are still being misled by the deceptive net prices which are quoted at the start of a booking.
Derefter følger så økonomiske krav, som forbrugeren ikke har kunnet indkalkulere, vel vidende at mange forbrugere modvilligt tager tillægget med i købet for at undgå yderligere besvær med at søge efter nye tilbud.
Requests are then made for extra money which the consumer did not budget for, and airlines know that many consumers unwillingly put up with the surcharge so as to avoid the additional bother of searching for new offers.
Har Kommissionen under henvisning til besvarelsen af den skriftlige forespørgsel E‑5112/­07 allerede resultater eller foreløbige resultater af undersøgelserne på dette område til rådighed?
With reference to the answer to Question E‑5112/07, does the Commission already have any findings or any results from the inquiries made in this area ?
Hvis ja, hvilke?
If so, what are these?
Er Kommissionen ikke også af den opfattelse, at denne praksis hos flyselskaberne er betænkelig af hensyn til forbrugerbeskyttelsen?
Does the Commission not agree that the practices of airlines are questionable from the point of view of consumer protection?
Er der planlagt handlinger fra Kommissionens side, der forhindrer, at konkurrencen fremover hindres af prisaftaler?
Are there any plans for action by the Commission to prevent future distortions of competition through price fixing?
Hvis dette er tilfældet, hvordan ser Kommissionens planer da ud?
If so, what are they?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1513/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1513/08
I lyset af forlydender om, at Usbekistans regering fortsætter med at begrænse sine borgeres sociale, politiske, mediemæssige og religiøse rettigheder, vil Rådet da støtte genindførelsen af visasanktioner i april 2008?
Given the recent record of Uzbekistan's Government in continuing to restrict its citizens' rights in terms of social, political, media and religious freedoms, will the Council support the reinstatement of visa sanctions in April 2008?