natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sidste år indledte Kommissionen Erasmus Mundus-programmet, som giver studerende fra tredjelande mulighed for at studere i Unionen.
Last year the Commission launched the Erasmus Mundus programme, which gives students from third countries the opportunity to come and study within the EU.
Det antal stipendier, som Unionen uddeler, er yderst begrænset; omfanget af stipendierne kan i store træk sammenlignes med en typisk årlig europæisk familieindkomst.
The number of scholarships which the EU awards is very limited; the amount of each scholarship compares very favourably with an average European family income.
Der arbejdes med såkaldte joint degrees, hvorved stipendiemodtagerne er forpligtet til at følge undervisningen ved flere europæiske uddannelsesinstitutioner.
Scholarship-holders study for joint degrees, which means that they are required to take courses at several European educational establishments.
På grundlag af hvilke argumenter anfører Kommissionen, at metoden med joint degrees må foretrækkes, og at den frembyder bedre kvalitetsgarantier end en uddannelsesgrad i samme tidsrum på én og samme europæiske uddannelsesinstitution?
On what grounds does the Commission maintain that joint degrees are preferable to, and guarantee quality more effectively than, a degree course of the same duration at a single European educational establishment?
Er Kommissionen klar over, at 18 af de 19 uddannelser, som fik deres ansøgning godkendt i september 2004, har haft problemer med at forklare, hvordan de i praksis vil håndtere joint/­double/­multiple degrees?
Is the Commission aware that administrators of 18 of the 19 courses, applications on behalf of which were approved in September 2004, had difficulty in explaining how they would in practice operate under the joint/double/multiple degree system?
På grundlag af hvilke argumenter afviser Kommissionen den påstand, at det meget begrænsede antal personer, som har mulighed for at opnå et favorabelt stipendium, giver Erasmus Mundus et elitært præg?
How can the Commission counter the argument that, as very few candidates stand a chance of receiving the generous scholarships, the Erasmus Mundus programme is elitist?
Er der mulighed for at forhøje de eksisterende Erasmus-stipendier og udvide dem til Erasmus Mundus-uddannelser?
Would it be possible to increase the existing Erasmus scholarships and extend them to cover Erasmus Mundus courses?
Hvorfor betragter Kommissionen i benægtende fald ikke den nuværende virkemåde som diskriminerende for studerende, der ønsker at studere inden for Europas grænser, eller som vil studere i tredjelande?
If not, how can the Commission show that the present system does not discriminate against students either studying within Europe or wishing to go and study in third countries?
Hvordan forholder det sig med planerne om udfærdige et integreret program for mobilitet inden for Den Europæiske Union for perioden efter 2006?
What is the current situation as regards the plans to draw up an integrated programme for mobility in the European Union for the period after 2006?
Hvilken placering vil Erasmus Mundus få i dette program?
What role will Erasmus Mundus play in them?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1320/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1320/05
Kommissionen har evalueret det første år med Erasmus Mundus som en succes (IP/­05/­04).
The Commission's assessment of the first year of Erasmus Mundus is that it was a success (IP/05/04).
Navnlig de supplerende midler til asiatiske studerende anføres som en positiv udvikling.
The additional funds for students from Asia, in particular, are cited as a positive development.
I hvilket omfang er den øgede opmærksomhed, der tillægges asiatiske studerende, i overensstemmelse med løftet om at tage hensyn til hjerneflugtfænomenet?
To what extent does the increased focus on students from Asia accord with the promise to take account of the phenomenon of the brain drain?
Finder Kommissionen ikke, at det med henblik på den såkaldte »brain circulation« vil være mere tilrådeligt at give lidt mindre stipendiebeløb til flere studerende?
In the interests of ‘brain circulation’, would it not be more advisable to give more students smaller scholarships?
Vil Kommissionen ellers overveje kun at tillade studerende fra udviklingslande?
Otherwise, will the Commission consider accepting only students from developing countries?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1321/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1321/05
Om: Olierørledning i Slovakiet
Subject: Oil pipeline in Slovakia
Den slovakiske region Zitny ostrov sydøst for Bratislava råder over en række usædvanligt fine drikkevandskilder, som forsyner ca. 1 mio. mennesker med vand.
The region of Žitný ostrov south-east of Bratislava, Slovakia, has a number of extremely good sources of drinking water, which supply around 1 million people with water.
Netop i denne region vil olieselskabet MOL, der har sit forretningsmæssige hjemsted i Ungarn, og som har overtaget det slovakiske olieselskab Slovnaft, overveje at etablere en olierørledning.
In this of all regions, the oil company MOL, which is based in Hungary and has taken over the Slovak oil company Slovnaft, is said to be considering constructing an oil pipeline.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med dette forhold, og finder den, at etableringen af en olierørledning i et vigtigt område for drikkevandsindvinding er i overensstemmelse med den gældende fællesskabslovgivning og navnlig EF-­traktatens artikel 174, hvori det hedder, at Fællesskabets politik på miljøområdet bygger på forsigtighedsprincippet og princippet om forebyggende indsats samt »princippet om indgreb over for miljøskader fortrinsvis ved kilden«?
Is the Commission aware of this, and does it consider the construction of an oil pipeline in an important water extraction area to be in accordance with Community law, particularly Article 174 of the EC Treaty, which states that the Community's environmental policy is based on the precautionary principle, the principle of preventive action and the principle that ‘environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source’?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1322/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1322/05
af Maria Martens (PPE-DE)
by Maria Martens (PPE‑DE)
Om: Krænkelse af kvinders rettigheder i De Forenede Arabiske Emirater
Subject: Violation of women's rights in the United Arab Emirates
I 1989 indgik det daværende Europæiske Fællesskab en samarbejdsaftale med Samarbejdsrådet for De Arabiske Golfstater (GCC).
In 1989 the European Community, as it then was, concluded a cooperation agreement with the GCC (Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf).
Et af resultaterne heraf er, at der hvert år afholdes et møde i Det Fælles Råd og et møde på ministerniveau mellem EU og GCC.
One consequence of this was that the EU and GCC hold an annual Joint Council/Ministerial Meeting.
I det fælles kommuniké udsendt efter det trettende møde i Det Fælles Råd og ministermødet i 2003 gentager GCC og EU deres engagement i at fremme og beskytte menneskerettighederne.
In the joint communiqué issued after the 13th meeting of the Joint Council/Ministerial Meeting in 2003, the GCC and the EU reiterated their commitment to promoting and protecting human rights.
Trods Golfstaternes engagement i at respektere menneskerettighederne, kunne den lokale avis Gulf News mandag den 14. marts 2005 berette om et tilfælde, hvor en husholderske i De Forenede Arabiske Emirater ved en islamisk domstol var blevet idømt 150 piskeslag, fordi hun var blevet gravid uden for ægteskab.
Despite the commitment of the Gulf States to respect human rights, on Monday, 14 March 2005 the local newspaper Gulf News reported on the case of a housekeeper in the United Arab Emirates whom an Islamic court had sentenced to 150 lashes for becoming pregnant outside wedlock.
Ifølge avisen blev kvinden anmeldt til politiet for at have begået utroskab og være blevet gravid.
According to the newspaper, the police had received an allegation that the woman had committed adultery and become pregnant.
Hun måtte forsvare sig mod disse påstande ved en islamisk domstol.
She was tried by an Islamic court for this.
Domstolen pålagde kvinden at lade en graviditetstest foretage.
The court ordered the woman to undergo a pregnancy test.
Da resultatet var positivt, blev dommen om de 150 piskeslag afsagt.
When the result proved positive, the sentence of 150 lashes was handed down.
Har EU allerede reageret på krænkelserne af kvinders rettigheder i De Forenede Arabiske Emirater?
Has the EU already responded to the violations of women's rights in the United Arab Emirates?
Har EU i benægtende fald til hensigt at reagere på disse krænkelser?
If not, will it do so?
Forhandlingerne mellem Den Europæiske Union og Golfstaterne om en frihandelsaftale befinder sig i øjeblikket i den afsluttende fase.
The negotiations between the European Union and the Gulf States on a free trade agreement are currently in their final stages.
Foruden de rent økonomiske aspekter drøftes der også politiske aspekter såsom menneskerettigheder, terrorisme, ikke-spredning og indvandring under disse forhandlinger.
In addition to purely economic aspects, political aspects such as human rights, terrorism, non-proliferation and migration are also being discussed as part of this process.
Vil frihandelsaftalen omfatte en mekanisme til på systematisk vis af kontrollere og håndhæve respekten for kvinders rettigheder i Golfstaterne?
Will the free trade agreement provide for measures to systematically monitor and enforce respect for women's rights in the Gulf States?
Vil der blive mulighed for at suspendere frihandelsaftalen, såfremt en Golfstat på vedvarende vis krænker kvinders rettigheder?
Will provision be made for suspending the free trade agreement if women's rights are continuously violated in one of the Gulf States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1323/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1323/05
Om: Kroatiens tiltrædelse og Del Pontex
Subject: Accession of Croatia and Mrs Del Ponte
Den 16. marts 2005 vedtog EU's udenrigsministre, at tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne med Kroatien først kan indledes, når den kroatiske general Ante Gotovina, som beskyldes for at have begået krigsforbrydelser, bliver udleveret til Jugoslavien-tribunalet.
On 16 March 2005, the EU Ministers for Foreign Affairs decided that accession negotiations with Croatia could begin only once the Croatian General Ante Gotovina, who is accused of war crimes, had been surrendered to the Yugoslavia Tribunal.
Ministrene traf deres afgørelse på basis af påstandene fra anklageren ved Jugoslavien-tribunalet, Carla Del Ponte.
The ministers based their decision on the charges brought by the prosecutor at the Yugoslavia Tribunal, Mrs Carla Del Ponte.
Del Ponte fremfører, at Gotovina stadig opholder sig i Kroatien, og at han nyder beskyttelse langt ind i statsstrukturerne.
Mrs Del Ponte claims that Gotovina is still in Croatia, where he is being protected even by State organisations.
Det bemærkelsesværdige er, at den kroatiske regering allerede i begyndelsen af marts 2005 selv anførte, at den ville hilse en særlig EU-gruppe velkommen, som skulle evaluere Zagrebs samarbejde med Del Ponte (Die Presse, 8. marts 2005).
Strikingly, the Croatian Government itself stated at the beginning of March 2005 that it would welcome a special EU committee to assess Zagreb's cooperation with Mrs Del Ponte ( Die Presse , 8 March 2005).
Nedsættelsen af den »blandede arbejdsgruppe« er da også et tydeligt tegn på, at EU selv ikke var begejstret for Del Pontes hårdnakkede holdning.
The setting-up of the joint working party is indeed a clear sign that the EU itself is not happy with the inflexible attitude of Mrs Del Ponte.
Del Pontes holdningsændring er ganske bemærkelsesværdig.
The way in which her attitude has changed is very remarkable.
I 2004 udtalte Kommissionen sig positivt om tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne.
In 2004 the Commission expressed itself in favour of accession negotiations.
Den tog i den forbindelse udgangspunkt i anbefalingerne fra Del Ponte, som anførte, at den kroatiske regering samarbejdede fuld ud med Jugoslavien-tribunalet.
This position was based on recommendations by Mrs Del Ponte, who said that the Croatian Government was cooperating fully with the Yugoslavia Tribunal.
I efteråret 2004 ændrede hun på ny sin holdning.
In autumn 2004, she suddenly changed her attitude.
Den 23. november udtalte hun over for FN's Generalforsamling, at der kun kunne være tale om et virkeligt samarbejde, såfremt Gotovina kom til Den Haag (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 2. marts 2005).
On 23 November 2004 she told the UN General Assembly that genuine cooperation would only be possible once Gotovina was in The Hague ( Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , 2 March 2005).
Del Ponte står under stærkt pres: alle udleveringer skulle generelt finde sted inden udgangen af 2004, og alle procedurer skal være afsluttet i 2008 (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 9. december 2004).
Mrs Del Ponte is under heavy pressure: according to the normal rules, all extraditions had to be completed before the end of 2004 and all the proceedings have to be completed in 2008 at the latest ( Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , 9 December 2004).
Hvor mange krav har Jugoslavien-tribunalet stillet til Kroatien?
How many demands has the Yugoslavia Tribunal addressed to Croatia?
Hvor mange krav er ikke opfyldt?
How many of them have not been complied with?
Hvilke beviser lægger Del Ponte til grund for sine anklager?
On what evidence are Mrs Del Ponte's charges based?
Hvilke instanser er hun afhængig af til fremskaffelse af bevismateriale?
On what organisations is she dependent in order to obtain evidence?
Hvad er den »blandede arbejdsgruppes« eksakte mandat?
What is the exact remit of the joint working party?
Hvad er arbejdsgruppens kriterium for at fastslå, om Kroatien samarbejder eller ej?
What is the working party's criterion for assessing whether Croatia is cooperating?
Forholder det sig ikke således, at man kan sige, at Kroatien samarbejder fuldt ud, når landet klart påviser, at det har truffet alle nødvendige foranstaltninger til at anholde bestemte mistænkte personer?
Could it not be said that Croatia is cooperating fully if it clearly demonstrates that it has taken all the measures which are necessary to detain certain suspects?
Det ærede parlamentsmedlem opfordres til at rette spørgsmålene om arbejdet i Det Internationale Krigsforbrydertribunal vedrørende det Tidligere Jugoslavien (ICTY) direkte til tribunalet.
The Honourable Member is invited to address the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) directly for questions concerning that institution's work.
Rådet understregede den 16. marts 2005 på ny EU's engagement med hensyn til Kroatiens tiltrædelse og vedtog forhandlingsrammen for Kroatien.
On 16 March 2005, the Council reaffirmed the European Union's commitment to Croatia's accession and adopted a negotiating framework for Croatia.
Det gjorde også opmærksom på, at det er vigtigt, at alle landene i det vestlige Balkan samarbejder fuldt ud med ICTY; dette er en væsentlig forudsætning for den fortsatte tilnærmelse til EU.
It also referred to the importance of full cooperation with the ICTY on the part of all the countries of the western Balkans; that is an essential requirement for closer relations with the EU.
Efter Rådets drøftelser og på baggrund af den manglende enighed blev indledningen af tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne udsat.
In that regard, after deliberation by the Council and in the absence of common agreement, the opening of accession negotiations has been postponed.
Den bilaterale regeringskonference indkaldes efter aftale, så snart Rådet har kunnet fastslå, at Kroatien samarbejder fuldt ud med ICTY.
The bilateral intergovernmental conference will be convened by common agreement as soon as the Council has established that Croatia is cooperating fully with the ICTY.
Den blandede arbejdsgruppe, som det ærede parlamentsmedlem henviser til, har til opgave i nær kontakt med ICTY og Kroatien at gennemgå de foranstaltninger, Kroatien har truffet og skal træffe med henblik på at nå frem til, at Kroatien samarbejder fuldt ud med ICTY.
The joint Working Party to which the Honourable Member refers is tasked with examining, in close liaison with the ICTY and Croatia, measures that have been taken and are to be taken by Croatia with a view to that country's full cooperation with the ICTY.
I den forbindelse trådte gruppen sammen med deltagelse af ICTY og Kroatien for at gennemgå den seneste udvikling med hensyn til Kroatiens samarbejde med ICTY.
In that context, the Working Party had a meeting with the ICTY and the Croatian side to examine the latest developments concerning Croatia's cooperation with the ICTY.
Kroatien forelagde navnlig en handlingsplan med henblik på at opnå fuldt samarbejde med ICTY.
Of particular note is the action plan presented by Croatia to bring about full cooperation with the ICTY.
I en skrivelse af 7. juni 2005 til formandskabet konstaterede ICTY's chefanklager, at Kroatien med iværksættelsen af sin handlingsplan har gjort fremskridt i retning af et fuldt samarbejde med ICTY, men at det dog først efter 3-­4 måneder vil kunne vurderes, om denne nye indsats har givet konkrete resultater.
In a letter to the Presidency dated 7 June 2005, the ICTY Chief Prosecutor noted that by implementing its action plan, Croatia was on the road to full cooperation with the ICTY but that three to four months were required to determine whether these further efforts had produced tangible results.
Den 13. juni 2005 noterede Rådet sig med tilfredshed denne nye oplysning og tilskyndede Kroatien til fortsat at intensivere sin indsats på dette område.
On 13 June 2005 the Council noted this new element with satisfaction and encouraged Croatia to continue to step up its efforts in this direction.
Rådet lovede at fortsætte behandlingen af sagen.
The Council has undertaken to continue to study this dossier.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1325/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1325/05
Om: Lukning af EUMC
Subject: Closure of the EUMC
I en rapport fra EU’s Observationscenter for Racisme og Fremmedhad (EUMC) i Wien hævdes det, at kun 43 % af danskerne ønsker kriminelle indvandrere udvist.
In a report from the EU’s Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) in Vienna, it was claimed that 43 % of Danish citizens desire the deportation of criminal immigrants.
Dette antal oplystes at være et af de laveste i hele EU.
This figure was reported as being one of the lowest in the EU.
Tallet er forkert.
This figure is wrong.
Det rigtige tal er velkendt: 78 % af danskerne ønsker udlændinge, som begår grov kriminalitet, sendt ud af landet.
The correct figures are well-known: 78 % of Danes want foreigners who have committed serious crimes to be deported from the country.
Denne kendsgerning ønskede EUMC åbenbart ikke at oplyse.
Clearly the EUMC did not want this information reported.
Som det er Kommissionen bekendt, søgte EUMC i 2004 at hindre offentliggørelsen af en rapport om antisemitisme, som centret selv havde bestilt, men som viste et resultat, der stred mod EUMC’s politiske holdninger.
As the Commission knows, the EUMC sought in 2004 to prevent the publication of a report on anti-Semitism which the Monitoring Centre itself had ordered, but which showed a result conflicting with the EUMC’s political attitudes.
Det er en skandale, at EU finansierer en gruppe venstreorienterede personers amatøragtige og politisk farvede oplysningsvirksomhed, som konsekvent giver et misvisende billede af status med hensyn til europæernes opfattelse af indvandringens konsekvenser.
It is a scandal that the EU funds the amateurish and politically biased information activities of a group of left-wingers, which consistently present a misleading picture of the state of European attitudes to the consequences of immigration.
Vil Kommissionen tage skridt til at lukke EUMC, afskedige dets politiserende leder, Beate Winkler, og overlade eventuel statistikvirksomhed på området til Eurostat?
Will the Commission take steps to close the EUMC, sack its politicising director, Beate Winkler, and leave any statistical work in this area to Eurostat?
(20. maj 2005)
(20 May 2005)
Rapporten fra EU's Observationscenter for Racisme og Fremmedhad (EUMC), som det ærede medlem henviser til, blev offentliggjort den 15. marts 2005 under titlen »Majority Attitudes towards Minorities«.
The report of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia to which the Honourable Member refers was made public on 15 March 2005 under the title ‘Majority attitudes towards minorities’.
Rapporten havde et veldefineret formål, som var at analysere data, der tidligere er indkommet fra tre Eurobarometer‑undersøgelser og European Social Survey fra 2003 om holdninger til minoriteter og migranter i forskellige europæiske lande.
The report had a well defined scope, which was to analyse data previously obtained from three Eurobarometer surveys and the 2003 European Social Survey on attitudes towards minorities and migrants in different European countries.
Det ærede medlem er velkommen til at henlede Kommissionens og selve observationscentrets opmærksomhed på eventuelle andre kilder til data, der kan være relevante for sidstnævntes videre arbejde.
The Honourable Member is welcome to draw the attention of the Commission and of the Monitoring Centre itself to any other source of data that may be relevant for the latter’s further work.
Kommissionen tillægger bekæmpelse af alle former for racisme og fremmedhad stor betydning.
The Commission attaches great importance to combating all forms of racism and xenophobia.
Den ønsker derfor at sikre, at observationscentrets kommende omdannelse til et agentur for grundlæggende rettigheder ikke er til skade for EU's arbejde vedrørende racisme og fremmedhad, som bør videreføres på en dynamisk måde.
Therefore, it is committed to ensuring that the future transformation of the Monitoring Centre in to a Fundamental Rights Agency will not be to the detriment of EU work on racism and xenophobia, which needs to be vigorously pursued.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1326/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1326/05
Om: Protokol til toldunionen, åbning af de tyrkiske luft- og søhavne for Cypern
Subject: Customs union protocol; opening up of Turkish ports and airports to Cyprus
Tyrkiet viser sig nu rede til at underskrive den protokol, der udvider den eksisterende toldunion med EU med de ti nye medlemsstater.
Turkey has indicated that it is prepared to sign the protocol extending its existing customs union with the EU to include the 10 new Member States.
Som en ordfører for Kommissionen har forklaret, må det automatisk betyde, at tyrkiske luft- og søhavne fremover er åbne for cypriotiske fly og skibe.
As a spokesman for the Commission has pointed out, that should automatically mean that Turkish ports and airports would in future be able to be accessed by Cypriot planes and ships.
Den tyrkiske udenrigsminister, Abdullah Gül, er imidlertid ikke enig.
However, the Turkish Foreign Affairs Minister, Abdullah Gül, does not see it that way.
I det tyrkiske parlament erklærede han den 29. marts, at protokollen kun drejer sig om fri bevægelighed for varer, og at der »ikke er tale om« åbning af luft- og søhavne.
He told the Turkish Parliament on 29 March that the protocol only concerns free movement of goods, and that there is ‘no question’ of opening up ports and airports.
Tyrkiets underskrivelse af denne protokol betragtes som en betingelse for indledning af tiltrædelsesforhandlinger i oktober.
The signing of the protocol by Turkey is regarded as a precondition for starting accession negotiations in October.
Hvilken betydning tillægger Kommissionen Tyrkiets underskrivelse af denne protokol, uden at landets luft- og søhavne åbnes for skibe og fly under cypriotisk flag?
What importance does the Commission attach to Turkey's signing of the protocol if ports and airports are not to be opened up to ships and planes flying the Cypriot flag?
Udsættes indledningen af forhandlinger, hvis Tyrkiet ikke giver sig i denne sag?
Will the start of negotiations be postponed if the Turkish Government sticks to its guns?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1327/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1327/05
Om: Beskyttelse af sprog og Europaskolen
Subject: Safeguarding of languages and the European School