natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den nuværende situation i Gazastriben er så alvorlig, at det — som i lignende situationer, hvor EU-institutionerne har spillet en aktiv rolle, f.eks. i Libanon — kræver, at der målrettet gribes ind for at opnå en konkret og omgående våbenhvile. —
The seriousness of the present situation in the Gaza Strip is such that intervention to achieve a real and immediate ‘cease fire’ is called for, as has occurred in similar situations (Lebanon for example) where the EU institutions were seen to play an active role.
Et sådant indgreb, der bør ske ved hjælp af organiserede fredsstyrker som repræsentanter for hele EU og i ekstraordinært samarbejde med Rusland, Ukraine og Hviderusland, er det eneste, der i øjeblikket kan sikre en afbrydelse af krigshandlingerne fra israelernes side og bringe fred til befolkningen og det kamphærgede område. —
Undertaken by peace forces structured to represent the EU in an exceptional joint action with Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, intervention of this kind is currently the only way to ensure that Israeli attacks stop and to bring peace to the people and the area affected by the fighting.
Samtidig vil det være overordentlig hensigtsmæssigt, at en sådan militærstyrke sørger for gennemførelse af alle FN's resolutioner vedrørende den israelsk-palæstinensiske konflikt.
At the same time, it would be an excellent opportunity for this military force to implement all the UN resolutions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Kan det på den baggrund tænkes, at mobiliseringen af en europæisk militærstyrke kan blive et prioriteret spørgsmål til indgående behandling i de kompetente institutionelle organer?
In view of the foregoing, might the competent institutional bodies consider mobilisation of an EU military force to be a matter that should be carefully examined as a matter of urgency?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0662/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0662/09
Om: Korrekt brug af Schengenfonden i Ungarn
Subject: Proper use of Schengen Fund in Hungary
Offentligheden i Ungarn følger »vandkanonsagen« med stor interesse og ønsker snarest at vide sandheden om denne sag.
Public opinion in Hungary is following the ‘water cannon affair’ with great interest and is keen to know the truth in this matter without delay.
Gennem 2006, 2007 og 2008 fastholdt den ungarske regering, at den havde købt vandkanoner af Schengenfonden på grundlag af en offentlig indkøbsprocedure, som ligeledes blev nævnt i Public Procurement Bulletin.
Throughout the years 2006, 2007 and 2008, the Hungarian government maintained that it had purchased water cannons from the Schengen Fund, on the basis of a public procurement procedure which also appeared in the Public Procurement Bulletin.
Den 22. oktober 2007 brugte politiet de nye vandkanoner til at sprede menneskemængder i Budapests gader.
On 22 October 2007 the police used the new water cannons to disperse crowds in the streets of Budapest.
I december 2008 meddelte justitsminister Tibor Draskovics imidlertid, at der ikke var gjort regnskab for købet af Schengenfonden.
However, in December 2008, Minister of Justice and Law Enforcement Tibor Draskovics announced that the purchase was not accounted for from the Schengen Fund.
Den 13. januar 2009 meddelte kommissær Jacques Barrot, at vandkanonerne ikke var blevet købt af Schengenfonden.
On 13 January 2009, Commissioner Jacques Barrot announced that the water cannons had not been purchased from the Schengen Fund.
Den 14. januar 2009 meddelte statssekretæren i justitsministeriet, at fra foråret 2008 tegnede den ungarske regering sig for købet af vandkanoner fra Ungarns andel af Schengenfonden.
On 14 January 2009 the State Secretary at the Ministry of Justice and Law Enforcement announced that, starting from spring 2008, the Hungarian Government was accounting for the purchase of water cannons from Hungary’s share of the Schengen Fund.
Jeg ønsker at spørge, om Kommissionen undersøgte, hvilken fond betalingerne blev foretaget fra, og om de foreløbige oplysninger var relevante for gennemførelsen af det offentlige indkøb?
I would like to ask if the Commission investigated which fund the payments were made from and whether the preliminary information was relevant for the execution of the public procurement.
Såfremt regeringen som følge af undersøgelsesproceduren stadig finder, at dens oversigter og fakturaer, som ikke stemmer overens med ovenstående, er relevante, hvordan kan den da forene dette med regeringens talsmands meddelelse fra januar 2009, om at vandkanonerne blev købt fra Ungarns andel af Schengenfonden?
If, as a result of the investigation procedure, the Government still considers its statements and invoices, which are inconsistent with the above, to be relevant, how can it reconcile this with the January 2009 announcement of the Government spokesman that the crowd dispersal equipment was purchased from Hungary’s share of the Schengen Fund?
Har Kommissionen undersøgt denne sag med henblik på at finde frem til sandheden om spørgsmålet om vandkanonerne?
Has the Commission investigated this matter in order to find out the truth in the matter of the water cannons?
Offentligheden er berettiget til at se dette problem løst snarest muligt.
Public opinion has a right to see this matter resolved as soon as possible.
Jeg mener derfor, at det er vigtigt, at Kommissionen svarer detaljeret på spørgsmålene fra de journalister, som følger sagen.
I therefore think it is important that the journalists following it are given detailed answers to their questions by the Commission.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0663/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0663/09
Om: Håndhævelse af de alment anerkendte begreber »makedonere« og »makedonsk« i EU's sprogbrug og frigørelse fra meningsuoverensstemmelserne om navnet på en stat
Subject: Continued use of the generally accepted terms ‘Macedonians’ and ‘Macedonian’ in the language usage of the EU, independent of the disagreement over the name of the country
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at i 2008 blev der i EU's officielle sprogbrug (»Vejledning i Udformning af EU-dokumenter«) anvendt begrebet »makedonere« som navnet på et folk i det allersydligste af den tidligere føderation Jugoslavien, og at begrebet »makedonsk« anvendtes deri som det af dette folk talte sprog, som er beslægtet med bulgarsk og serbisk?
Can the Commission confirm that up until 2008, in the official language usage of the European Union (‘Interinstitutional Style Guide’), the term ‘Macedonians’ was used for the name of a people in the far south of the former Yugoslavia and that the term ‘Macedonian’ was used for the language spoken by the people concerned, a language related to Bulgarian and Serbian?
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at disse alment anerkendte begreber, »makedonere« og »makedonsk«, allerede har været benyttet længe og var fuldstændigt adskilt fra den opståede meningsuoverensstemmelse, der har eksisteret siden Jugoslaviens sammenbrud i 1991, om hvad det internationalt accepterede navn på den frigjorte retsefterfølger skulle være på den allersydligste delstat i det tidligere Jugoslavien, som i henhold til sin egen grundlov kalder sig selv »Republikken Makedonien«, og som af internationale organer og af mange forskellige stater bliver benævnt som »den tidligere Jugoslaviske Republik Makedonien«, en meningsuoverensstemmelse, der har haft som konsekvens, at der nu i mange år har været forhandlet om at nå til et sammensat statsnavn, som Nord-Makedonien, Høj-Makedonien, Ny-Makedonien eller Vardar-Makedonien, således at denne stat tydeligere kan skilles fra det sydlige af det historiske Makedonien, som siden 1912 ligger på græsk territorium?
Can the Commission confirm that the generally accepted terms ‘Macedonians’ and ‘Macedonian’ have long been used and are completely unrelated to the disagreement which emerged following the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991 regarding what should be the ultimate internationally accepted name for the independent legal successor to the southernmost state of the former Yugoslavia, which, under its own constitution, calls itself the ‘Republic of Macedonia’ and which is referred to by international bodies and by many individual countries as the ‘Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’, a disagreement that has led to negotiations already being held for many years on the possibility of adopting a composite name for the country such as North Macedonia, Upper Macedonia, New Macedonia or Vardar Macedonia, which would distinguish the country more clearly from the south of the historic Macedonia that, since 1912, has belonged to the territory of Greece?
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at de i spørgsmål 1 omtalte alment anerkendte begreber »makedonere« og »makedonsk« samt landekoden »MK« for nylig er blevet erstattet af angivelser som »to be defined«, som gør den fortsatte anvendelse af disse standardbegreber usikker, og som kan føre til, at en ny strid blusser op om anvendelsen af andre navne for dette folk og dette sprog?
Can the Commission confirm that the generally accepted terms ‘Macedonians’ and ‘Macedonian’ referred to in the first question and the country code ‘MK’ have recently been replaced by notes such as ‘to be defined’, which makes the continued use of these standard terms uncertain and which could lead to a new dispute breaking out over the application of other names to this people and this language?
Tager Kommissionen hensyn til, at som følge af denne tågede tilstand, der kan opstå ved »to be defined«, kan problemet med navngivning, som indtil nu udelukkende vedrørte staten, og som det sandsynligvis er muligt at løse inden for overskuelig tid, udbredes til andre emner, som er meget mere følsomme, da de vedrører den nationale identitet og derfor forbliver så godt som uløselig?
Does the Commission bear in mind that, as a result of the unclear situation which may be created by the reference ‘to be defined’, the name problem, which to date solely concerned the country and which can probably be resolved within the foreseeable future, is being extended to other areas which are far more sensitive in so far as they concern national identity and which it will therefore remain virtually impossible to resolve?
Kan Kommissionen bidrage til, at den gamle tilstand, hvor der ikke var usikkerhed omkring den alment anerkendte anvendelse af begreberne »makedonere« og »makedonsk«, så hurtigt som muligt genoprettes med henblik på at hindre uønskede nye komplikationer og eskalationer?
Could the Commission take steps with a view to re-establishing as soon as possible the previous situation in which there was no uncertainty over the generally accepted use of the terms ‘Macedonians’ and ‘Macedonian’, so as to prevent undesirable new complications and escalation of the problems?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0664/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0664/09
af Glenys Kinnock (PSE) og Dan Jørgensen (PSE)
by Glenys Kinnock (PSE) and Dan Jørgensen (PSE)
Om: Uregelmæssigheder i udviklingsprojekter og EU-indkøb af ekstremt dyre moskitonet
Subject: Irregularities in development projects and EU procurement of excessively expensive mosquito nets
I en rapport fra Verdensbanken (Detailed Implementation Review, India Health Sector — World Bank fra december 2007 Rapporten findes her: (http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/ORGANIZATION/ORGUNITS/EXTDOII/0,,contentMDK:21810144~menuPK:5372841~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:588921,00.html). .) omtales væsentlige uregelmæssigheder i Verdensbankens sundhedsprogram i Indien, der blev sat i gang i 1997 og afsluttet i 2002 foranlediget af beskyldninger om bedrageri og korruption.
A report from the World Bank (Detailed Implementation Review, India Health Sector — World Bank from December 2007 The report can be found here: (http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/ORGANIZATION/ORGUNITS/EXTDOII/0,,contentMDK:21810144~menuPK:5372841~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:588921,00.html) ) shows considerable irregularities in the World Bank's health programme running in India from 1997 until it was terminated in 2002 due to allegations of fraud and corruption.
Et af de problemer, der fremhæves i rapporten, vedrører levering, indkøb, salg og distribution af langtidsholdbare, insekticidimprægnerede sengenet (de såkaldte LLIN'er), som forebygger malaria.
One of the problems emphasised in the report concerns the supply, buying, sale and distribution of long-lasting, insecticide-treated bed nets, the so-called LLINs which prevent malaria.
I henhold til rapporten har procedurerne og beslutningerne, for så vidt angår indkøb af sengenet, været af en sådan art, at tilbud på sengenet har været genstand for bedrageri og korruption, hvilket har resulteret i høje priser og en anden og ringere kvalitet end lovet.
According to the report, the procurement procedure and decisions on bed nets have been such that tenders on bed nets have been subject to fraud and corruption, which resulted in high prices and different, and poorer, quality than promised.
Uregelmæssighederne i styringen af programmet resulterede i et spild af skatteborgernes penge og et sundhedsprogram, der var mindre effektivt end forventet, til skade for dem, der modtager støtte gennem sundhedsprogrammet.
The irregularities in the management of the programme resulted in a waste of taxpayers' money and a less effective health programme than expected, at the expense of the beneficiaries of the health programmes.
Da de fleste af Verdensbankens programmer er sponsoreret af EU-medlemsstater, er det af stor vigtighed, at EU fremmer fuld gennemsigtighed i disse sager.
As most World Bank programmes are sponsored by members of the EU, it is of great importance that the EU facilitates full transparency on these issues.
Har Kommissionen dokumentation for disse uregelmæssigheder, eller — hvis ikke — har Kommissionen til hensigt at indhente dokumentation for påstandene i Verdensbankens rapport, for derefter at rense eller indstævne de europæiske virksomheder for retten, der er anklaget i sagen?
Does the European Commission have any documentation on these irregularities, or if not, does the European Commission intend to procure documentation of the claims in the World Bank report, thus clearing, or summoning before a court, the European companies accused in the case?
Hvis lignende problemer er opstået andre steder i verden, kunne EU være medvirkende til, at priserne på sengenet holdes kunstigt høje grundet korruption og andre uregelmæssigheder.
If similar problems have arisen elsewhere in the world the EU could be contributing to keeping prices of bed nets artificially high due to corruption and other irregularities.
Vil Kommissionen tage initiativ til at undersøge, om EU-midler har været brugt lovligt til indkøb af net fra de anklagede selskaber i andre dele af verden?
Will the European Commission take the initiative to investigate whether EU funds have been used legally in buying nets from the accused companies, in other parts of the world?
(12. marts 2009)
(12 March 2009)
Verdensbanken gennemførte disse projekter alene uden nogen deltagelse eller finansiering fra Kommissionens side.
The World Bank was undertaking these projects alone and without any Commission involvement or finance.
Kommissionen er bekendt med rapporten fra Verdensbanken (Detailed Implementation Review, India Health Sector — World Bank, Department of Institutional Integrity fra december 2007 Rapporten findes her:(http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/ORGANIZATION/ORGUNITS/EXTDOII/0,,contentMDK:21810144~menuPK:5372841~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:588921,00.html). ), der omtaler uregelmæssigheder i det sundhedsprogram, som Verdensbanken gennemførte i Indien fra 1997 til 2002.
The Commission is aware of the report from the World Bank (Detailed Implementation Review, India Health Sector — World Bank, Department of Institutional Integrity, December 2007 The report can be found here: (http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/ORGANIZATION/ORGUNITS/EXTDOII/0,,contentMDK:21810144~menuPK:5372841~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:588921,00.html). ) which shows irregularities in the health programme which the World Bank ran in India from 1997 to 2002.
Kommissionen har ingen yderligere dokumentation om sagen, men Kommissionens delegation i Delhi har fulgt situationen gennem offentligt tilgængelige oplysninger og vil fortsætte med at overvåge situationen nøje.
The Commission does not have any additional documentation on the matter, although the Commission Delegation in Delhi has followed the situation via publicly available information and will continue to monitor the situation closely.
Verdensbanken har meddelt, at den har til hensigt at undersøge sagen, og Kommissionen er villig til at støtte Verdensbanken i den forbindelse.
The World Bank has stated its intention to investigate, and the Commission is ready to support the World Bank in this regard.
De fællesskabsmidler, der bruges til at købe malarianet, anvendes hovedsagelig gennem Den Globale Fond til Bekæmpelse af Aids, Tuberkulose og Malaria, et enestående offentligt-privat partnerskab, som har til opgave at skaffe og udbetale midler til forebyggelse og behandling af aids, tuberkulose og malaria.
EC funds used to buy malaria-control nets are mainly used through the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria, a unique global public/private partnership dedicated to attracting and disbursing resources to prevent and treat AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria.
Europa-Kommissionen deltager i styringen af Den Globale Fond via en plads i bestyrelsen og deltagelse i fondens strategiske udvalg.
The European Commission is involved in the governance of the Global Fund through a seat on its Board and involvement in its Policy Strategy Committee.
Kommissionen vil også gennemgå femårsevalueringen af Den Globale Fond, som snart vil blive offentliggjort.
The Commission will also study the Five‑Year Evaluation of the Global Fund which is due to be published shortly.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0665/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0665/09
Om: Det rumænske mindretal i det østlige Serbien
Subject: Romanian minority in Eastern Serbia
Forbindelserne mellem de serbiske myndigheder og det rumænske mindretal i det østlige Serbien ændrer sig i stadig mere foruroligende grad.
Recent developments in the relations between the Serbian authorities and the Romanian minority in Eastern Serbia have been noted with more than a little concern.
Selv om det serbiske mindretal i Rumænien råder over seks kirker og et par klostre, anerkender Serbien kun religionsfrihed for rumænere i Voïvodine og ikke for rumænere i det østlige Serbien.
Although Romania is a country in which the Serbian minority has dozens of churches and several monasteries, Serbia only allows Romanians living in Voivodina (and hence not to those in Eastern Serbia) to enjoy religious rights.
I Timokregionen hindrer de serbiske myndigheder rumænernes udøvelse af de religiøse rettigheder.
In the Timoc region, the Serbian authorities are placing obstacles in the way of Romanians’ exercising of their religious rights.
Den rumænske præst, Boian Alexandrovici, kæmper for at bevare de rumænske religiøse særtræk i en region, hvor rumænerne gennem længere tid har været frataget deres grundlæggende rettigheder, som de i øvrigt stadig ikke har opnået fuldt ud.
More precisely, Boian Alexandrovici, a man who has fought to preserve the Romanian spirit in an area in which Romanians for long had no basic rights, and which they have still not completely acquired, was notified by the local Serbian authorities in Negotin, on 21 January 2009, that he had 15 days to demolish the Romanian Orthodox church erected in Malainiţa, close to Negotin.
Den 21. januar 2009 gav de serbiske lokale myndigheder fra kommunen Negotin Alexandrovici en frist på fjorten dage til at nedrive den rumænske ortodokse kirke, som var opført i landsbyen Malajnica i nærheden af Negotin, og dette på trods af, at byggeriet af denne bygning, som er den andenstørste rumænske kirke i Timokregionen, var påbegyndt den 8. marts 2008 efter modtagelsen af de officielle dokumenter fra de lokale myndigheder.
This was despite the fact that the work on that church, which is the second Romanian church in the Timoc region, started on 8 March 2008, after the local authorities had received all the documentation needed for construction to begin.
Dette ultimatum føjer sig til en anden utænkelig situation, idet der i september 2008 blev truffet afgørelse om, at selv samme Boian Alexandrovici, som er medlem af den rumænske ortodokse kirke, skulle udvises af den serbiske ortodokse kirke.
That deadline came after another unimaginable situation had arisen: in September 2008, Boian Alexandrovici, a priest belonging to the Romanian Orthodox Church, was notified by the Serbian Orthodox Church of its decision to defrock him.
Med andre ord blev denne præst jaget bort fra denne kirke, som han end ikke var medlem af!
In other words, this Romanian priest has been thrown out of a Church to which he did not, in any case, belong.
Agter Kommissionen ikke med Serbien som kandidatland til optagelse i EU at sætte spørgsmålet om nedrivning af den rumænske ortodokse kirke i Negorin på dagsordenen for sine bilaterale møder med de serbiske myndigheder?
In view of the fact that Serbia is an EU candidate state, can the Commission state whether it will raise this concrete issue of the demolition of the Romanian Orthodox church in Negotin at its bilateral meetings with the Serbian authorities?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen derudover træffe for at sikre, at religionsfriheden overholdes for det rumænske mindretal i det østlige Serbien?
Could it also indicate what steps it plans to take to ensure respect for the religious rights of the Romanian minority in Eastern Serbia?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0666/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0666/09
Om: Associeringsaftale mellem EU og Centralamerika
Subject: Association Agreement between the EU and Central America
Hvilke foranstaltninger påtænker Kommissionen at træffe for at sikre, at den åbne konkurrence ikke kommer til at betyde en nedgang i antallet af job for kvinder i den offentlige sektor i Centralamerika?
What action does the Commission envisage taking to ensure that open competition will not result in the reduction of public sector jobs in Central America for women?
For så vidt angår den åbne konkurrence og de europæiske private virksomheders stigende andel af beskæftigelsen i Centralamerika, der følger i kølvandet heraf, hvad gør Kommissionen da for at sikre, at dette ikke vil forværre jobvilkårene og skabe længere arbejdstider for kvinder og mænd?
With regard to the open competition, and the increased proportion of European private companies' employment in Central America which will result, what is the Commission doing to ensure that this will not result in worse job conditions and longer hours worked by women and men?
Hvilke overvejelser har Kommissionen gjort sig med henblik på at fastholde den levestandard, som befolkningen i Centralamerika har i øjeblikket, og de forskellige konsekvenser, den foreslåede liberalisering af samhandel, investeringer og tjenesteydelser har på mænd og kvinder?
What assessments has the Commission undertaken to safeguard the current standard of life Central Americans currently enjoy and the differential impact of the proposed trade, investment and service liberalisation on men and women?
Hvilken fleksibilitet vil EU udvise for at beskytte en marginaliseret gruppe som kvinder?
What flexibility will the EU show to protect marginalised groups such as women?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0667/09
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0667/09
Om: Beskyttelse af statussen som »kandidat til medlemskab af EU« ved en hurtig start på tiltrædelsesforhandlinger med Den Tidligere Jugoslaviske Republik Makedonien
Subject: Protection of the status of candidate for EU membership by making a speedy start to accession negotiations with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Husker Rådet sin beslutning af 16. december 2005 om at tilkende Den Tidligere Jugoslaviske Republik Makedonien statussen som kandidat til medlemskab af EU?
Does the Council recall its decision of 16 December 2005 to grant the status of candidate for membership of the European Union to the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia?