natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Den øgede anvendelse af biomasse risikerer ifølge de seneste forskningskonklusioner fuldstændigt at ødelægge skovenes CO 2 -brønde eller med andre ord ødelægge deres evne til at optage luftens CO 2.
According to the new research findings, greater use of bio-energy threatens to ruin the ability that forests have to act as a carbon sink, in other words to store carbon occurring in the atmosphere.
Opretholdelse af en effektiv CO 2 -optagelse fra skovenes side kræver, at træfældningen holdes klart under den gennemsnitlige trætilvækst, hvilket i øvrigt på nuværende tidspunkt er tilfældet i Europa.
To maintain an effective carbon sink, the felling rate has to be markedly lower than the standing timber growth rate: that, indeed, is what is happening in Europe at the moment.
Bør Kommissionen i lyset af den seneste forskning ikke også revidere sin målsætning for anvendelse af vedvarende energikilder, således som den er blevet anmodet om, hvad angår biobrændstoffer?
In the light of the latest research, does the Commission see any reason to revise the renewable energy target, adopting the approach already called for where biofuels are concerned?
Tog Kommissionen hensyn til risikoen for rovdrift på skovene, da den besluttede at fastholde sine bindende målsætninger?
Has it allowed for the danger of overcutting that might arise if it abides by the binding targets?
Ser den ikke, at de negative følger for skovenes evne til at optage CO 2 er reelle?
Does it recognise that the adverse consequences for the carbon-accumulating properties of forests are a real possibility?
Hvad vil den gøre for at imødegå denne potentielle trussel?
What will it do to avert this potential threat?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4249/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4249/08
(24. juli 2008)
(24 July 2008)
Om: Rensningsanlægget til spildevand i Villadepalos (Ponferrada, Spanien)
Subject: Situation concerning the Villadepalos waste water purification plant (Ponferrada, Spain)
85 % af anlægget skulle finansieres af C.H.N., det spanske miljøministerium samt bidrag fra Den Europæiske Fond for Regionaludvikling (EFRU), mens de resterende 15 % skulle finansieres af regeringen i Castilla y León i form af national medfinansiering.
85 % of the funding to carry out this work came from the C.H.N. and Environment Ministry with contributions from the European Union's ERDF and 15 % was provided by the Castilla y León Regional Government in the form of national co‑financing.
Det bør bemærkes, at det i en aftale blev besluttet, at anlægget, når det var opført og afsluttet, skulle overdrages til den offentlige enhed, som fremgår af den almindelige protokol, og som efterfølgende skulle være ansvarlig for anlæggets drift.
It should be noted that an agreement exists stating that once the works were completed and approved they would be handed over to be used by the public body stipulated in the general protocol which, as of that moment, would assume full responsibility for said works.
Den 11. september 2006 indviede de spanske myndigheder rensningsanlægget, men på nuværende tidspunkt er anlægget endnu ikke taget i brug på trods af, at alle tekniske krav og administrative procedurer er overholdt.
On 11 September 2006 the Spanish authorities inaugurated the purification plant, which is, at the time of writing, still not operational even though it complies with all technical and administrative requirements.
I maj 2008 klagede partiet, Izquierda Unida, over denne situation og over forsøget på at privatisere anlægget.
In May 2008, the Izquierda Unida party criticised this state of affairs as well as the intention to privatise this service.
Borgmesteren i Ponferrada besvarede klagen og henviste til behovet for denne privatisering grundet anlæggets avancerede teknologi og tvivl om den offentlige forvaltnings kapacitet.
In answer to this criticism, the mayor of Ponferrada justified the need for privatisation on the grounds that the complex technology at the plant raised doubts about whether it could be managed by the public sector.
Kommissionen bedes anmode de spanske myndigheder om følgende oplysninger:
Can the Commission obtain the following information from the Spanish authorities: —
Hvornår skal det pågældende anlæg tages i brug? —
When will this plant be operational? —
Hvorfor er der ikke truffet passende foranstaltninger, som sikrede, at anlægget kunne forvaltes af distriktsrådet i El Bierzo? —
Why have the appropriate measures not been taken for this service to be managed by the El Bierzo district council? —
Kan Kommissionen efter at have medfinansieret 85 % af anlægget acceptere en privatisering af denne offentlige tjeneste?
Having provided 85 % of the funds for the works, can the Commission allow this public service to be privatised?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4250/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4250/08
Om: Almería kommunes manglende overholdelse af fællesskabslovgivningen om offentlige indkøb
Subject: Non-compliance by Almería city council with Community rules on public procurement
Den 26. oktober 2004 besluttede Almería kommune at tildele konsortierne Telvent Interactiva, Inalbensa og Telvent Tráfico y Transporte en administrativ koncessionskontrakt til udformning, opførelse, drift og vedligeholdelse af et center for avancerede digitale tjenester, som skulle placeres i El Toyo i Almería.
On 26 October 2004, Almería city council agreed to award the temporary group made up of the Telvent Interactiva, Inalbensa and Telvent Tráfico y Transporte companies an administrative concession contract for the design, construction, operation and maintenance of an Advanced Digital Services Centre for the ‘El Toyo’ housing complex and the City of Almeria.
Kontrakten blev tildelt efter offentliggørelse af et udbud efter forhandling og efter en hastebehandling.
The contract was awarded by means of an urgent negotiated procedure with prior publication.
Den 13. juni 2007 afsagde domstolens anden afdeling for forvaltningssager i Almería en dom, hvor den annullerede de administrative godkendelsesprocedurer i forbindelse med indkaldelsen af bud samt tildelingen af kontrakten.
On 13 June 2007, the Almería Administrative Disputes Courts No 2 ruled that the administrative acts approving the call for tender and contract award should be annulled.
Domstolen mente ikke, at årsagerne til hastebehandling, som kommunen havde angivet, var korrekte, eller at kommunens begrundelse for at anvende metoden med udbud efter forhandling var berettiget, eftersom det var muligt at fastsætte kontraktprisen, hvilket fremgår af følgende: (a) Opførelsen udviser ikke særlige karakteristika, som forhindrer beregningen; og (b) efter at udbudsrunden var indledt, og der var foretaget en gennemførlighedsundersøgelse, havde man beregnet såvel investeringsomkostninger som driftsomkostninger.
The judge considered that the grounds of urgency invoked by the city council were not true and that the reason given by the city council for using the negotiated procedure was false, since it was indeed possible to determine the price of the contract, as (a) there were no specific characteristics of the work that prevented an assessment of the cost and (b) both the investment cost and operating costs were quantified in the feasibility study from the point when the tender was launched.
Den 26. maj 2008 afsagde Andalusiens højesteret (Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía) en dom, som godkendte Almería kommunes tiltag.
Subsequently, on 26 May 2008, the supreme court of justice of Andalusia issued a ruling that ratified the decision taken by Almería city council.
På grundlag af bestemte interne rapporter fra Almería kommune mente Andalusiens højesteret ikke, at kontraktprisen kunne fastsættes på forhånd.
It considered that the price of the contract could not be determined ‘a priori’ on the basis of certain internal reports at the city council.
Alt tyder på, at kommunen kendte såvel investeringsomkostningerne som den pris, den var villig til at betale, før fremgangsmåden udbud efter forhandling blev valgt, og at den manglende angivelse af pris i højere grad skyldes et ønske om at anvende udbud efter forhandling frem for de ordinære udbudsformer.
This all shows that the city council knew, before opting for the negotiated procedure, both the investment cost and the price it was prepared to pay and that the inability to determine the price was more due to the desire to make use of the negotiated procedure instead of the standard procedures.
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe for at sikre, at Almería kommune overholder den nævnte fællesskabslovgivning?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to ensure that Almería city council complies with the aforementioned Community rules?
Agter Kommissionen at undersøge denne sag og anmode de spanske myndigheder om at annullere den administrative procedure, såfremt der er tale om en overtrædelse?
Does the Commission intend to look into this case and, if it is established that there has been an infringement, ask the Spanish authorities to annul the administrative act?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4251/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4251/08
Om: Den iranske gruppe Folkets Mujahedin
Subject: The People's Mujahedin of Iran
Vil Kommissionen efter den britiske appelrets afgørelse nu hæve forbuddet mod den iranske gruppe Folkets Mujahedin?
Following the decisions of the UK's Court of Appeal, will the Commission now remove the ban on the People's Mujahedin of Iran?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4252/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4252/08
Om: Tyrefægtning i Spanien
Subject: Bullfighting in Spain
Vil Kommissionen udtale sig om tyrefægtning i Spanien?
Will the Commission make a statement on bullfighting in Spain?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4253/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4253/08
Om: Kinesiske våben til Darfur
Subject: Chinese arms used in Darfur
Hvilke oplysninger har Kommissionen om, at Kina fortsætter med at levere våben og militærudstyr til Darfur, og hvilke foranstaltninger træffer den?
What evidence does the Commission have of China continuing to supply arms and military equipment for use in Darfur; and what action is it taking?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4254/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4254/08
Om: Tyskernes holocaustbenægtelse
Subject: Germans' denial of the Holocaust
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at det er mærkeligt, at der i den tyske statsborgerskabstest ikke står noget om holocaust og tyskernes udryddelse af 6 millioner jøder?
Does the Commission not regard it as bizarre that the test for German citizenship does not mention the Holocaust and the extermination of six million Jews by the Germans?
Vil Kommissionen foreslå den tyske regering at ændre testen og medtage et spørgsmål om denne forfærdelige del af Tysklands historie, som ikke må gå i glemmebogen?
Will it suggest to the Government of Germany that it alters the test to include a question on this not-to-be-forgotten and despicable part of Germany’s history?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4255/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4255/08
Om: Nye sanktioner mod Zimbabwe
Subject: New sanctions on Zimbabwe
Vil Kommissionen iværksætte flere sanktioner mod Zimbabwe i samme ånd som den FN-resolution, Rusland nedlagde veto mod?
Will the Commission increase the sanctions imposed on Zimbabwe in the spirit of the resolution vetoed at the UN by Russia?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4256/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4256/08
Om: Retsforfølgelse af Sudans præsident
Subject: Prosecution of President of Sudan
Vil Kommissionen udtrykke anerkendelse af Den Internationale Straffedomstol for at overveje at udstede arrestordre mod præsidenten af Sudan, Omar Hassan al-Bashir, for folkemord og forbrydelser mod menneskeheden samt foreslå, at domstolen danner præcedens og rejser tiltale mod Mugabe?
Will the Commission congratulate the International Criminal Court for considering the issue of warrants for the arrest of the President of Sudan, Omar Hassan al-Bashir, for genocide and crimes against humanity, and suggest that it extends this important precedent and indicts Mugabe?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4257/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4257/08
Om: Den radikale islams uforenelighed med franske og europæiske værdier
Subject: Radical Islam incompatible with French and European values
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4258/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4258/08
Om: Spansk tyrefægtning som en del af Europas kulturarv
Subject: Spanish bullfighting in Europe's cultural heritage
Har Kommissionen planer om at anerkende spansk tyrefægtning som en del af Europas kulturarv?
Does the Commission have any plans to recognise Spanish bullfighting as part of Europe's cultural heritage?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4259/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4259/08
Om: Støtte til tyrefægtningsarenaer i Spanien
Subject: Subsidies for Spanish bullfighting buildings
Vil Kommissionen give en detaljeret redegørelse for den støtte, der er ydet til bygning og renovation af spanske tyrefægtningsarenaer?
Will the Commission give full details of the subsidies that have been given to the building and renovating of Spanish bull rings?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4260/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4260/08
Om: Støtte til tyrefægtning i Spanien
Subject: Subsidising Spanish bullfighting
Vil Kommissionen give en detaljeret redegørelse for den direkte og indirekte støtte, der ydes til spansk tyrefægtning?
Will the Commission provide full details of the direct and indirect subsidies given to Spanish bullfighting?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4261/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4261/08
På side 47 i den engelske udgave af årsberetningen fra Den Europæiske Unions Agentur for Grundlæggende Rettigheder oplyses det, at der er indført et forbud mod, at ansatte i Antwerpen og Gent, som har kontakt med borgerne, bærer synlige symboler, der vedrører deres religion eller livsanskuelse.
47 of the English version of the FRA's annual report it is mentioned that employees of the cities of Antwerp and Ghent who come into contact with the public are banned from wearing visible religious symbols or symbols indicative of world views.
Agenturet antyder, at dette forbud er udtryk for racisme og diskrimination på arbejdspladsen, selv om foranstaltningen ikke er rettet mod en bestemt gruppe.
The FRA suggests that this ban is an expression of racism and discrimination in the work-place, although the measure is not specifically aimed at one group.
Finder Kommissionen, at denne foranstaltning er et udtryk for racisme og/eller diskrimination?
Does the Commission consider such a measure to be an expression of racism and/or discrimination?
Hvilke skridt agter Kommissionen i benægtende fald at tage for at hindre, at et organ som Agenturet for Grundlæggende Rettigheder medtager et sådant emne i sin årsberetning?
If not, what steps will it consider taking to prevent such an institution as the FRA from including such items in its annual report?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4262/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4262/08
Om: Årsberetningen for 2008 fra Den Europæiske Unions Agentur for Grundlæggende Rettigheder — sprogundervisning
Subject: FRA Annual Report for 2008: language teaching
Dette beskrives i punktets indledning som »en rettighed«.
The introduction to this point describes this as a ‘right’.
Således kritiseres bl.a. den tyske delstat Bayern kraftigt, fordi undervisningen i disse sprog skal ophøre i 2009.
The German Land of Bavaria is among those who are criticised because education in foreign languages is to cease in 2009.
Alene denne omtale vækker det indtryk, at agenturet anser dette for at være et udslag af racisme og/eller diskrimination.
The very mention of this suggests that the FRA regards this as an expression of racism and/or discrimination.
Anser Kommissionen det for passende at betegne tilbud om undervisning i indvandreres sprog som en rettighed?
Does the Commission consider it appropriate to describe providing education in the language of immigrants as a right?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4263/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4263/08
Om: Årsberetning fra Den Europæiske Unions Agentur for Grundlæggende Rettigheder — ulovlige indvandrere
Subject: FRA Annual Report: illegally resident aliens
I årsberetningen fra Den Europæiske Unions Agentur for Grundlæggende Rettigheder behandles bl.a. spørgsmålet om ulovlige indvandrere, der angiveligt har problemer med at få lægebehandling.
The FRA's annual report mentions the subject of illegally resident aliens who are said to have problems in obtaining medical assistance.
I pkt. 4.4.2.2 hævdes det, at mange ulovlige indvandrere har begrænset viden om deres ret til at modtage akut lægehjælp, og at de desuden har problemer med sproget og kulturforskellene.
In point 4.4.2.2 it is stated that many illegally resident aliens are too poorly informed about their right to urgent medical assistance and that moreover they have to overcome language problems and cultural barriers.
Anser Kommissionen det for passende at tage et sådant emne op i en årsberetning om racisme og diskrimination, navnlig når problemerne er et resultat af de pågældendes egen beslutning om at opholde sig ulovligt i EU?
Does the Commission consider it appropriate to deal with such a subject in an annual report on racism and discrimination, particularly bearing in mind that these problems are attributable to the personal choice of the people concerned to reside in the European Union illegally?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4264/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4264/08
Om: Den Europæiske Unions Agentur for Grundlæggende Rettigheder — muslimske kvinder og mandligt sundhedspersonale
Subject: FRA Annual Report for 2008: Muslim women and male medical staff
I pkt. 4.4.2 i årsberetningen fra Den Europæiske Unions Agentur for Grundlæggende Rettigheder tages problemet med muslimske kvinder, der ikke ønsker at blive behandlet af mandlige læger eller sygeplejersker, op.
Point 4.4.2 of the FRA's annual report mentions the problem of Muslim women who refuse to be examined by male doctors or nurses.
Tilsyneladende antyder agenturet, at problemet skyldes manglen på kvindelige læger og sygeplejersker snarere end mentaliteten hos de muslimske patienter (og/eller deres mandlige slægtninge), der i sig selv er udtryk for en diskriminerende adfærd over for mandligt sundhedspersonale.
The FRA seems to suggest that the cause of the problem lies in the unavailability of women doctors and female nurses rather than in the mentality of these Islamic patients (and/or their male family members), who themselves discriminate against male medical staff.
Anser Kommissionen det for passende, at dette spørgsmål behandles på denne måde i en årsberetning om racisme og forskelsbehandling?
Does the Commission consider it appropriate that this subject should be broached in this way in an annual report on racism and discrimination?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4265/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4265/08
I Tyrkiet er der på ny tale om en stigning i antallet af tilfælde af tortur.
The number of cases of torture in Turkey is again rising.
I 2007 blev der registreret 300 tilfælde.
In 2007, 300 cases were reported.
EU's repræsentant i Ankara, Ulrike Hauer, gjorde på en pressekonference opmærksom på dette.
Mrs Ulrike Hauer of the European Union representation in Ankara has pointed this out at a press conference.
Hvilke skridt har Kommissionen taget for at tage dette spørgsmål op over for de tyrkiske myndigheder?
What steps has the Commission taken in relation to the Turkish Government in order to raise this problem?
Har den tyrkiske regering truffet konkrete foranstaltninger med tilsagn om at forbedre forholdene?
Has the Turkish Government announced practical measures, committing itself to achieving results?
Hvilke følger har det stigende antal torturtilfælde for forhandlingerne om Tyrkiets tiltrædelse?
What consequences will the increase in the number of cases of torture have for the continuation of the negotiations on the accession of Turkey?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4269/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4269/08
Om: Nuværende indskrænkninger af fiskeriaktiviteter samt fiskebestanden i tredjelande
Subject: Current curtailment of fishing activity and third world fish stocks
Er Kommissionen enig i, at den nuværende indskrænkning af europæiske fartøjers fiskeriaktiviteter vil føre til en situation, hvor den nye paneuropæiske flåde vil sejle ind i den tredje verdens farvande og reducere deres bestand samt eksportere billig fisk til Europa, mens befolkningerne i den tredje verden ikke vil have råd til at købe fiskene?
Does the Commission agree that the current curtailment of fishing activity by vessels from EU Member States will lead to a situation where the new pan-European fleet will move into third world waters and decimate their stocks and also export cheap fish back to Europe, while the populations of third world countries will not be able to afford to buy such stock?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4270/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4270/08
af Colm Burke (PPE-DE)
by Colm Burke (PPE‑DE)
Om: Rettigheder for mennesker med amputationer
Subject: Amputee rights
EU undertegnede den 30. marts 2007 FN's konvention om handicappedes rettigheder, som yder beskyttelse til 50 mio. EU-borgere.
The European Community signed the UN Treaty on Disability Rights on 30 March 2007, which provides protection for 50 million EU citizens.
Irland er den eneste medlemsstat, hvor en person, der mister et lem, selv eller gennem forsikring skal finansiere købet af en protese.
However, Ireland is the only Member State of the European Union where a person who loses a limb has to fund from his or her own resources or by insurance the purchase of a prosthetic replacement.
Hvilke tiltag vil Kommissionen derfor foreslå for at sikre fuld gennemførelse af rettighederne for mennesker med amputationer i Irland samt for at sikre, at Irland til fulde opfylder sine forpligtelser i henhold til FN-konventionen?
Therefore, what course of action could the Commission suggest that would lead to the fulfilment of amputee rights in Ireland as well as Ireland meeting its obligations under the UN Convention?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4271/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4271/08
af Hélène Flautre (Verts/ALE) , Alain Hutchinson (PSE) , Marco Cappato (ALDE) og Giusto Catania (GUE/NGL)
by Hélène Flautre (Verts/ALE) , Alain Hutchinson (PSE) , Marco Cappato (ALDE) and Giusto Catania (GUE/NGL)
Om: Politivold under udvisningsforsøg
Subject: Police brutality during an attempted forcible removal
Den 26. april 2008 smed det belgiske forbundspoliti på voldelig manér Serge Fosso af Brussels Airlines-flyafgangen SN0351 mod Kinshasa over Douala.
On 26 April 2008, the Belgian police forcibly removed Serge Fosso from Brussels Airlines flight SN0351 to Kinshasa via Douala.
Han havde protesteret imod den brutale kvælningsmetode, som politiet brugte ved udvisningen af Ebenitzer Folefack Sontsa, en papirløs camerouner, der efterfølgende døde den 1. maj 2008 under urolige omstændigheder i det »lukkede center« i Merksplas i Belgien.
He had protested against the brutal suffocation method used by the police when expelling Ebenizer Folefack Sontsa, a Cameroonian migrant without documents who subsequently died on 1 May 2008 in unclear circumstances at the Merksplas detention centre in Belgium.
Som følge af denne protest blev han på voldelig manér smidt ud og sat i en celle i Bruxelles lufthavn i over 10 timer uden mad og drikke, og uden at måtte kontakte sin familie.
Following this protest, he was violently removed and detained in a cell at Brussels airport for over 10 hours, with nothing to eat or drink and without being able to contact his family.
Selskabet Brussels Airlines har indført sanktioner mod hr. Fosso, såsom udelukkelse fra alle Brussels Airlines' flyafgange i seks måneder, nægtelse af refundering af billetomkostningerne og de værdigenstande, der blev taget fra hans håndbagage, som han fik tilbage efter, at den havde været 12 dage i Douala.
Brussels Airlines’ measures against Mr Fosso include banning him from all Brussels Airlines flights for six months, failing to reimburse his air ticket and failing to reimburse the cost of valuables taken from his hand luggage, which was recovered 12 days later in Douala.
Selskabet Brussels Airlines informerede derefter hr. Fosso om, at de forbeholder sig retten til at kræve erstatning for det økonomiske tab forbundet med forsinkelsen og retten til at retsforfølge ham.
Brussels Airlines then told Mr Fosso that it reserved the right to claim damages for commercial injury resulting from the delay and to take proceedings against him.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med de ovenfor fremlagte begivenheder?
Is the Commission aware of the facts reported here?