natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvordan den vil sikre, at alle medlemsstater effektivt håndhæver Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1/2005, og at de har sanktioner, der står i et rimeligt forhold til overtrædelsen og er rimelige, for at stoppe den udbredte tilsidesættelse af reglerne?
Can the Commission explain how it plans to ensure that all Member States successfully enforce Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 and that they have proportionate and dissuasive penalties in place to stop the widespread flouting of the rules?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-000498/2011
Question for written answer E-000498/2011
Om: Revision af metrokontrakten i Thessaloniki
Subject: Revision of the contract for the Thessaloniki Metro
Den græske viceminister for infrastruktur, transport og netværk, Giannis Magriotis, bekendtgjorde for nylig ændringer i omfanget af den fysiske genstand for det igangværende lønarbejde i forbindelse med metroen i Thessaloniki, idet han aflyste den planlagte bygning af tre stationer (Papafi, Vulgari og Nea Elvetia).
Not long ago the Greek Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, and Networks, Giannis Magriotis, announced that the ongoing building work on the Thessaloniki Metro was to be scaled down and three projected stations (Papafi, Voulgari, and Nea Elvetia) would accordingly not be built.
Som en følge af disse ændringer, bekendtgjorde viceministeren endvidere ændringer i det efterfølgende program, som vedrører udgravningen af tunnelen i forbindelse med førnævnte stationer, med nye ændringer i tidsplanen samt ændring af den endelig pris for den igangværende kontrakt.
Furthermore, the changes which are to be made to the tunnel building programme will result in alterations to completion dates and, of course, the final price of the existing contract.
Hvad er status på pengestrømmen indtil i dag fra hver af deltagerne i den finansielle struktur med hensyn til betalingen for de udførte projekter? —
What has been the make-up to date of the flows of funding provided by the financial backers in order to pay for the work carried out?
Hvilke af de bekendtgjorte ændringer med hensyn til tidsplanen og finansieringen er blevet godkendt?
What changes have been approved where completion dates and financing are concerned?
Er de respektive tjenester i Kommissionen tilfredse med de påståede begrundelser for de gentagne ændringer i projektets tidsplan? —
Is the Commission willing to accept the justifications put forward for the repeated alterations to project completion dates?
Har Kommissionens tjenestegrene deltaget i forhandlingerne med den græske regering og Den Europæiske Investeringsbank om ændringerne af den fysiske side og den anvendte metodik i forbindelse med projektet?
Has the Commission been involved in talks with the Greek Government and the European Investment Bank about the scaling-down of the work and the change of working method?
I bekræftende fald, vurderer Kommissionen da, at de ansvarlige myndigheders fremsatte argumenter er baseret på force majeure eller på omstændigheder og data, som man kunne og burde have forudset og taget stilling til under projektets modningsfase og efterfølgende tildeling?
If so, does it consider that the reasons adduced by the authorities concerned constitute force majeure or, on the contrary, that they have to do with events and factors that could and should have been foreseen and taken into account at the design stage and when the project was awarded?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-000499/2011
Question for written answer E-000499/2011
Jutta Steinruck (S&D) og Petra Kammerevert (S&D)
Jutta Steinruck (S&D) and Petra Kammerevert (S&D)
Om: Migrationernes historie i Europa
Subject: History of migration in Europe
De europæiske samfund har i stigende grad et multikulturelt præg.
Increasingly multicultural societies in Europe require the development of intercultural skills and support for intercultural dialogue.
Derfor er det nødvendigt at udvikle interkulturelle kompetencer og fremme den interkulturelle dialog.
Migrations and their consequences constitute an ongoing socio‑political challenge which needs to be looked at from a long‑term perspective.
Migrationer og følgerne heraf er en konstant samfundspolitisk udfordring og en langsigtet opgave.
Unesco's Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity emphasises the need to support cultural diversity.
I UNESCO's erklæring om kulturel mangfoldighed understreges nødvendigheden af at fremme kulturel mangfoldighed (Universel Erklæring om Kulturel Mangfoldighed, vedtaget på UNESCO's generalkonference i Paris i november 2006).
(Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity, adopted by the General Conference of Unesco, Paris, November 2001).
UNESCO kræver respekt for kulturernes mangfoldighed og opfordrer til tolerance, dialog og samarbejde i en atmosfære af gensidig forståelse og tillid.
Unesco calls for respect for the diversity of cultures and for tolerance, dialogue and cooperation in a climate of mutual understanding and trust.
På europæisk plan blev der i 2008 som led i det europæiske år for interkulturel dialog givet støtte til talrige programmer og initiativer mellem medlemsstaterne indbyrdes og med tredjelande.
At a European level, numerous programmes and initiatives were implemented between Member States and third counties in the context of the 2008 European Year of Intercultural Dialogue.
I hvor høj grad prioriterer Europa-Parlamentet som led i sin kulturindsats migrationshistorien og dennes udforskning og formidling? —
How much importance does the Parliament attach to the history of migration and the research into and mediation of this subject in its cultural activities? —
Hvordan støtter EU bevarelsen af migranternes kulturarv i Europa? —
How does the European Union help to preserve the cultural heritage of migrants in Europe? —
Hvilke støtteprogrammer og projekter i de seneste fem år har fokuseret og fokuserer stadig på migrationens historie? —
Which support programmes and projects have focused on the history of migration during the past five years? —
På hvilken måde støttes projekter, som udforsker og formidler migrationens historie i de enkelte europæiske lande og i Europa? —
What support is given to projects that investigate and deal with the history of migration in individual European countries and in Europe in general? —
Hvordan prioriteres migrationshistorien i planerne om et europæisk »Historiens Hus«? —
What role does the history of migration play in the planning of the House of European History? —
På hvilken måde beskæftiger de regionale repræsentationer i EU sig med migrationens historie i form af (vandre‑)udstillinger og andre arrangementer?
In what way do regional representations to the EU deal with the history of migration in (travelling) exhibitions and other events?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-000500/2011
Question for written answer E-000500/2011
En voksende gruppe af virksomheder indfører øko-indekskonceptet i deres produktionskæder.
A growing number of companies are introducing the ‘Eco Index’ concept in their production chain.
Øko-indekset kan være et vigtigt instrument til at øge kundernes bevidsthed.
The Eco Index could be an important instrument for raising customer awareness.
Hvordan ser Kommissionen på dette koncept?
What is the Commission’s view of this concept?
Er det eventuelt tilrådeligt at udvikle en ensartet, uafhængig testmetode, så forbrugerne kan sammenligne diverse produkters økologiske fodaftryk på en pålidelig måde?
Might it be advisable to develop a uniform, independent testing method so that consumers can compare the environmental footprint of various products in a reliable manner?
Hvad mener Kommissionen om eventuelt at anvende øko-indekskonceptet til navnlig at anspore producenter uden for EU til miljøvenlig produktion?
What does the Commission think of the idea of possibly using the Eco Index concept to encourage producers, particularly those from outside the EU, to employ environmentally friendly production methods?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-000501/2011
Question for written answer E-000501/2011
Josefa Andrés Barea (S&D) og Andres Perello Rodriguez (S&D)
Josefa Andrés Barea (S&D) and Andres Perello Rodriguez (S&D)
Om: Massedødelighed blandt fisk i Albufera, Valencia (Natura 2000‑nettet)
Subject: Mass deaths of fish in Albufera de Valencia (Natura 2000)
Den spanske civilgardes tjeneste Seprona undersøger i øjeblikket dødeligheden blandt fiskene, idet dødstallet overstiger 40 000.
Seprona, the environmental protection service of the Spanish Guardia Civil. is investigating these mass deaths, which may already have affected more than 40000 fish.
Myndighederne er indtil videre fremkommet med tre muligheder, som kan forklare det alvorlige miljømæssige problem.
So far the authorities are considering three hypotheses that might explain this serious environmental problem.
Der er for det første mistanke om, at dødeligheden blandt fiskene skyldes en ulovlig deponering fra en fabrik i nærheden af Catarrojaslugten (som løber gennem naturparken).
Firstly, it is suspected that the causes of fish mortality could be related to illegal discharges from a factory situated close to Catarroja ravine (which borders on the natural park).
En anden mulighed kunne være iltmangel samt vådområdets vandkvalitet.
A second hypothesis is that the cause could be related to a lack of oxygen and water quality in the wetland.
Endelig tyder alt på, at årsagen til, at kanalerne langs naturparken er forurenet, skyldes organisk affald fra rishalm fra bedrifter i Albufera, ligesom det var tilfældet i oktober sidste år.
Lastly, however, all the signs are that the actual cause is once again to be found in the possibility that the water in the canals that run alongside the park may be polluted as a result of the organic decomposition of rice straw from the fields near the Albufera, in a repeat of last October's incident.
I lyset deraf har regionalregeringen i Valencia indført forbud mod at afbrænde denne affaldstype for dermed at beskytte naturparken.
According to this hypothesis, the risk facing the natural park stems from the decision taken by the Valencian regional government not to burn the rice straw.
EU tillader imidlertid visse undtagelser for så vidt angår afbrænding af foder og landbrugsaffald, hvilket kan ske gennem metoder, som er mere bæredygtige og mindre luftforurenende end førnævnte fremgangsmåde.
The European Union allows derogations whereby animal feed and agricultural waste can be burnt using techniques that are more sustainable than simple, air-polluting incineration.
De stigende omkostninger, der er forbundet med de mere bæredygtige metoder (energiudnyttelse, affaldstransport til økologiske anlæg til udnyttelse af biomassen etc.) har imidlertid resulteret i, at den valencianske regionalregering har besluttet fortsat at modtage EU‑støtte for at undgå affaldsafbrænding.
However, given the greater costs of these more sustainable techniques (energy recovery, transporting the waste to ecoparks for use as biomass, etc.), it appears that the Valencian government has decided to continue to claim the aid that the EU grants for not incinerating this type of waste but without finding an alternative method of disposing of it.
Omvendt har regionalregeringen ikke fundet en løsning på problemet, hvilket resulterer i, at de miljømæssige ødelæggelser fortsætter på grund af den valencianske regionalregerings manglende indsats på området.
As a result, the environmental damage to the water in the park and the species living in it caused by this failure to act on the part of the Valencian government is greater than the pollution that would be caused by incinerating the waste.
Har Kommissionen kendskab til de nævnte forhold og til Sepronas undersøgelse?
Is the Commission aware of the above situation and the investigation launched by Seprona?
Agter Kommissionen at indlede sin egen undersøgelse af de miljømæssige indvirkninger på naturområdet Albufera i Valencia, som er underlagt Natura 2000‑nettet?
Will the Commission launch its own investigation into environmental problems in the Natura 2000 protected area of Albufera de Valencia?
Er Kommissionen tilfreds med den valencianske regionalregerings anvendelse af EU‑midlerne til forvaltning af landbrugs- og skovaffald, herunder rishalm?
Does the Commission believe that the Valencian government is making proper use of the resources allocated by the EU to promote the sound management of agricultural and forestry waste, in this case rice straw?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-000502/2011
Question for written answer E-000502/2011
Om: Udviklingen inden for skibsbygningsindustrien
Subject: Projected developments in the shipbuilding sector
Kommissæren fremhævede endvidere en række punkter, som er forbundet med den nuværende krise.
A series of predictions were also made on the development of the crisis.
Som opfølgning på de aspekter, der fremgik af svaret, og i lyset af den bekymring, som krisen har skabt i regioner, hvor industrien bidrager væsentligt til områdets BNP, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende:
In order to complete some of the aspects mentioned in this answer and given that the crisis is a cause for concern in the regions in which this industry represents a significant proportion of their GDP, I would like to know:
Hvilke forventninger har Kommissionen til udviklingen inden for skibsbygningsindustrien for så vidt angår tab af arbejdspladser?
Does the Commission foresee job losses in the shipbuilding sector?
Kan Kommissionen sætte tal derpå?
Can it say how many?
Hvilke europæiske skibsværfter eller regioner er mest berørt?
Which shipyards or European regions are likely to be the most affected?
Hvilken tidshorisont er ifølge Kommissionen forbundet med genopretningen?
What is the Commission's time-frame for recovery?
Hvilken udvikling forventer Kommissionen at se inden for øget efterspørgsel og nye skibstyper?
What are the Commission's forecasts for the growth in demand and the new types of vessels that will create this demand?
Hvor lang tid skal der ifølge Kommissionen bruges på at genoprette den pågældende sektor?
What is the Commission's estimated time-frame for the recovery mentioned in its answer?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-000503/2011
Question for written answer E-000503/2011
Om: Peninsula i New York II
Subject: New York Peninsula Hotel II
Kommissionsmedlemmet Sefcovic nægtede i strid med de gældende bestemmelser om besvarelse af forespørgsler til skriftlig besvarelse at besvare spørgsmålene i forespørgsel E‑9485/2010 »Peninsula i New York«.
As Commissioner Sefcovic has refused, contrary to the rules on replies to written questions, to answer the points set out in Written Question E-9485/2010 , ‘New York Peninsula Hotel’, I am putting forward the questions again.
Vedrører udgifterne til Peninsula i New York betaling for overnatning og forplejning på et hotel?
Was the payment to The Peninsula New York intended to cover the cost of hotel accommodation and meals?
Hvilke personer (navn eller i det mindste funktion og institution) har gjort brug af disse ydelser?
Who made use of those services (the persons concerned should be named or at least identified by their position or institution)?
Hvor meget udgjorde udgifterne pr. overnatning?
What was the cost of one night’s stay?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-000504/2011
Question for written answer E-000504/2011
Om: Abelag — Premiere Private Jet Services III
Subject: Abelag — Premiere Private Jet Services III
Kommissionsmedlemmet Sefcovic nægtede i strid med de gældende bestemmelser om besvarelse af forespørgsler til skriftlig besvarelse at besvare spørgsmålene i forespørgsel E‑9483/2010 »Abelag — Premiere Private Jet Services«.
As Commissioner Sefcovic has refused, contrary to the rules on replies to written questions, to answer the points set out in Written Question E- 9483/2010, ‘Abelag — Premiere Private Jet Services’, I am putting forward the questions again.
Kan Kommissionen fremsende en liste med disse oplysninger, ligesom den gjorde for året 2008 i forbindelse med forespørgsel E‑6323/2009?
Could the Commission forward a list, as it has already done for 2008 in response to Question E‑6323/2009?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-000505/2011
Question for written answer E-000505/2011
Om: Ureglementeret uddelegering af beføjelser hos OLAF
Subject: Irregularities in connection with the delegation of powers in OLAF
I sag 856/2008/BEH mod Det Europæiske Kontor for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF) har Den Europæiske Ombudsmand for nylig fastslået, at beføjelserne til at indlede og afslutte OLAF's undersøgelser ikke er blevet udøvet på reglementeret vis.
In connection with complaint 856/2008/BEH against the European Anti‑Fraud Office (OLAF), the European Ombudsman recently found that powers to open and close investigations by the Office were being exercised in an irregular manner.
I sit forslag til henstilling af 9. december 2010 skriver Ombudsmanden i punkt 104 bl.a. følgende:
In paragraph 104 of his Draft Recommendation of 9 December 2010, the Ombudsman states, inter alia :
» (…) the Ombudsman concludes that OLAF did not establish that its practice of delegating the power to open and close decisions from the Director-General to the Director in charge of investigations and operations is in accordance with the law. (…) This constitutes an instance of maladministration. «
‘ (…) the Ombudsman concludes that OLAF did not establish that its practice of delegating the power to open and close decisions from the Director-General to the Director in charge of investigations and operations is in accordance with the law. (…) This constitutes an instance of maladministration.’
Mener Kommissionen i lyset heraf, at den oplysning, som OLAF gav Kommissionen i forbindelse med svaret på min forespørgsel E‑3872/2010 af 3. juni 2010, var korrekt?
In the light of this finding, does the Commission consider that the information provided to it by OLAF in connection with its reply to my Written Question E- 3872/2010 of 3 June 2010 was correct?
Der blev her givet indtryk af, at OLAF's generaldirektør kun modtager rådgivning i forbindelse med sine afgørelser.
This information gave the impression that the Director-General of OLAF only seeks advice in taking decisions.
Kan Kommissionen nu besvare mit spørgsmål af 3. juni 2010 om, hvornår disse beføjelser blev uddelegeret første gang, og hvor længe Kommissionen har været bekendt hermed?
Could the Commission now answer my question of 3 June 2010 regarding when this delegation of powers first took place and since when the Commission has been aware of it?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om OLAF-Overvågningsudvalget har beskæftiget sig med spørgsmålet om uddelegering af beføjelser hos OLAF, og hvis ja, med hvilket resultat?
Could the Commission indicate whether the OLAF Supervisory Committee has looked into the issue of the delegation of powers in OLAF and, if so, with what outcome?
Hvilke konsekvenser har den ureglementerede uddelegering af beføjelser efter Kommissionens mening haft for brugbarheden af resultaterne af OLAF's undersøgelser, og hvordan vurderer Kommissionen risikoen for, at berørte parter kan få annulleret resultaterne af undersøgelser ved domstolene under henvisning til procedurefejl?
In the Commission's view, what impact do irregularities in connection with the delegation of powers have in terms of the validity of the results of investigations by the Office, and how great a risk is there that parties affected could take action to have the results of investigations quashed by the courts, making reference to procedural errors?
Vil OLAF følge Ombudsmandens henstilling og ændre sin praksis?
Will OLAF respond to the Ombudsman's recommendation and change its practice?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-000506/2011
Question for written answer E-000506/2011
Om: OLAF's nye vurdering af finansieringen af Europa-Parlamentets bygninger
Subject: OLAF's review of the funding of European Parliament buildings
Den Europæiske Ombudsmand roste i en pressemeddelelse den 20. september 2010 (nr. 17/2010) Kontoret for Bekæmpelse af Svig (OLAF), fordi det har fulgt hans henstilling om at foretage en ny vurdering af sagen om finansiering af Europa-Parlamentets Altiero Spinelli-Bygning i Bruxelles.
In a press release on 20 September 2010 (No 17/2010) the European Ombudsman praised the European anti-fraud office OLAF for complying with his recommendation to review the case of the funding of the Altiero Spinelli building in Brussels.
Sagen går tilbage til 2002, da en journalist gjorde Kommissionen opmærksom på formodede uregelmæssigheder i forbindelse med bygningens finansiering.
This case dates back to 2002 when a journalist informed the Commission of alleged irregularities in connection with the funding of the building.
Parlamentet havde besluttet at lade en virksomhed udføre tjenesteydelser i forbindelse med finansieringen af købet af bygningen uden at offentliggøre et udbud.
Parliament had decided to instruct a firm to carry out services relating to the funding of the purchase of the building without issuing an invitation to tender.
OLAF indledte en undersøgelse og afsluttede sagen i 2006 uden at anbefale yderligere skridt.
OLAF launched an investigation and closed the case in 2006 without recommending any further measures.
I maj 2007 henvendte klageren sig til Ombudsmanden og anklagede OLAF for ikke at have foretaget en egentlig undersøgelse af, om der skulle have været offentliggjort et udbud.
In May 2007 the complainant approached the Ombudsman, accusing OLAF of failing to carry out a proper investigation of whether an invitation to tender should have been published.
OLAF udtalte, at der ikke var konstateret entydige uregelmæssigheder, som kunne danne grundlag for en disciplinær- eller straffesag.
OLAF stated that no clear irregularity had been detected which could have led to the opening of disciplinary or criminal proceedings.
Der var derfor ikke behov for en mere grundig undersøgelse.
There was therefore, it claimed, no need for a more detailed investigation.
Ombudsmanden var ikke overbevist om dette.
The Ombudsman was not convinced.
Han mente, at en så snæver opfattelse af OLAF's mandat kunne føre til, at OLAF ikke fuldt ud kunne opfylde sin opgave, nemlig at bekæmpe svig, korruption og anden ulovlig aktivitet, som skader EU's finansielle interesser.
Such a narrow interpretation of OLAF’s mandate, he said, could mean that OLAF was unable fully to perform its duty of combating fraud, corruption and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the EU.
Ifølge Ombudsmanden erklærede OLAF sig til sidst indforstået med at foretage en ny vurdering af sagen.
Following the statements by the Ombudsman, OLAF eventually agreed to review the case.
Hvornår har OLAF påbegyndt denne nye evaluering?
When did OLAF begin this review?
Er denne vurdering i mellemtiden afsluttet, og hvis ja, med hvilket resultat, og hvem har truffet afgørelsen?
Has the review now been completed, and if so, what decision has been taken on the outcome and by whom?
Har OLAF også undersøgt indgåelsen af byggekontrakter i forbindelse med Parlamentets Willy Brandt- og József Antall-Bygninger med henblik på eventuelle uregelmæssigheder?
Has the award of the building contracts for the European Parliament’s Willy Brandt and József Antall buildings also been investigated by OLAF for possible irregularities?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-000507/2011
Question for written answer E-000507/2011
Om: Kommissionens forlængelse af kontrakter for levering af computersoftware
Subject: Renewal of contracts by the Commission for the supply of computer software
I sit svar på undertegnedes forespørgsel (14. maj 2008) E‑1533/2008 oplyste Kommissionen om varigheden af kontrakterne om levering af computersoftware til de computere, som benyttes af ansatte og tjenestemænd inden for EU, på tre år (med start i 2007) og med mulighed for forlængelse med endnu ét år.
In its answer (14 May 2008) to my Question E‑1533/2008, the Commission provided information about the duration of contracts to supply software for computers used by EU employees and officials, which was 3 years (starting in 2007), extendable for a further year.
I henhold til ovennævnte forventes Kommissionen at skulle indgå nye kontrakter i 2011.
According to the above, the Commission is expected to sign new contracts in the course of 2011.