natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jeg vil gerne gøre Kommissionen opmærksom på nogle nylige hændelser i Belarus: Siarhiej Kawalenka, der er aktivist i det konservative kristne parti »den belarussiske nationale front«, blev anholdt af politiet, da han anbragte et rødt og hvidt flag på toppen af et juletræ, der stod på sejrspladsen i Vitebsk.
I should like to draw the Commission's attention to recent events in Belarus.
Flaget var anerkendt i den belarussiske folkerepublik fra 1918‑1919 samt efter USSR's sammenbrud indtil 1995.
Siargej Kavalenka, an activist of the Conservative Christian Party of the Belarusian People's Front, was detained by police after he hung a white-red-white flag from the top of a Christmas tree on Vitebsk's Victory Square.
Flaget bruges nu af det belarussiske oppositionsmiljø.
This flag, which was used between 1918 and 1919 by the Belarusian People's Republic and following the collapse of the USSR until 1995, is now used by Belarusian opposition groups.
Anklagemyndigheden i Vitebsk besluttede at varetægtsfængsle Siarhiej Kawalenka i to måneder.
Vitebsk's public prosecutor decided that Siargej Kavalenka should be remanded in custody for two months.
Den anholdte har i en samtale med den uafhængige portal Karta-97 fortalt, at han blev beordret til at underskrive en afgørelse om at ændre forebyggende foranstaltning.
The detainee informed independent web portal Charter 97 that he had been ordered to sign a ruling releasing him from detention on condition that he does not leave the country.
Siarhiej Kawalenka er desuden anklaget for verbale og fysiske krænkelser, og de politibetjente, der anholdt ham, kræver 10 mio. belarussiske rubler i erstatning.
Siargej Kavalenka has additionally been charged with using insulting language and gestures, and the arresting officers are demanding BYR 10 million in compensation.
Siarhiej Kawalenka har ikke tilstået de gerninger, han er anklaget for.
Siargej Kavalenka denies the charges brought against him.
Han påstår, at han ikke gjorde modstand ved anholdelsen, selv om han blev slået af politibetjentene.
He claims not to have resisted arrest, despite having been beaten up by the police officers.
Datoen for Siarhiej Kawalenkas domsfældelse er rykket til den 12. maj.
His trial has been postponed until 12 May.
Menneskerettighederne krænkes notorisk i Belarus, og jeg synes derfor, at det er nødvendigt at minde om de undertrykkede oppositionsaktivister.
In view of the continuous violations of human rights in Belarus, it is essential to stand up for opposition activists suffering repression.
Den straf, Siarhiej Kawalenka kan modtage, stemmer slet ikke overens med den gerning, han har begået.
The punishment being faced by Siargej Kavalenka is incommensurate with the act committed.
Ophængningen af det rød-hvide flag var en politisk handling, ikke en bøllegerning.
The hanging of the white-red-white flag was a political act, not an act of hooliganism.
Jeg vil i denne forbindelse spørge Kommissionen, om den har til hensigt at overvåge den belarussiske aktivists sag og gribe ind for at beskytte ham mod undertrykkelse?
In light of this, does the Commission intend to look into the case of this Belarusian opposition member and to intervene to protect him against repression?
Jeg vil i denne forbindelse også gerne bede om oplysninger om fremskridt i den dialog, som Kommissionen fører med de belarussiske myndigheder om respekt for borgerrettighederne.
In this context, would the Commission provide a progress report on the civil liberties dialogue it is conducting with the Belarusian authorities?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3217/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3217/10
af Tadeusz Cymański (ECR)
by Tadeusz Cymański (ECR)
Om: Alternativer til forsøg gennemført på dyr
Subject: Alternatives to animal testing
En forhandling i Europa-Parlamentet, der fandt sted i den foregående valgperiode, viste samtidig, at visse af de alternative metoder vækker stor tvivl og modstand.
However, during the debates which Parliament held in its previous term, it became apparent that some of these alternative methods raised serious doubts and opposition.
Det fremgik af ændringen af indholdet i artikel 4, stk. 1, i Kommissionens forslag til direktiv.
This was evident in the amendment to Article 4(1) of the proposal for a directive.
Som følge af trilogen mellem Rådet, Parlamentet og Kommissionen kan staterne forsat suverænt bestemme, om de vil give tilladelse til metoder med anvendelse af celler, der stammer fra menneskeembryoner eller -fostre, som alternativer til dyreforsøg.
Furthermore, a trialogue between the Council, Parliament and the Commission upheld the right of Member States to take sovereign decisions on the application of methods using human embryonic and foetal stem cells as an alternative to conducting experiments on animals.
Mener Kommissionen, at sådanne undersøgelser skal finansieres af EU‑budgettet, selv hvis de kun tillades i visse medlemsstater?
In view of the doubts and opposition raised, in particular, by the use of human embryonic and foetal stem cells, does the Commission consider that such research ought to be financed from the EU budget if such methods are not permitted in all Member States?
Undersøgelserne skaber tvivl og modstand, især i forbindelse med anvendelse af celler, der stammer fra menneskeembryoner eller ‑fostre.
Does it currently take part in financing research using human embryonic and foetal stem cells under the 6th and 7th Framework Programmes?
Omfatter den også skabelse af menneskeembryoner med det bevidste formål at dræbe dem i forbindelse med videnskabelige undersøgelser, eller omfatter finansieringen alene undersøgelser på eksisterende embryoner?
Is such funding comprehensive, i.e., does it cover the creation of human embryos destined to be deliberately killed during scientific research, or does it only fund research carried out on pre-existing embryos?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3218/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3218/10
Om: Diskrimination af portugisisk arbejdstager i Tyskland
Subject: Discrimination against a Portuguese worker in Germany
En portugisisk statsborger har i ca. 40 år boet og arbejdet i Tyskland, hvor han altid har betalt de lovbestemte bidrag.
A Portuguese citizen who has lived and worked in Germany for almost 40 years now, has always paid the deductions required by law.
Han mistede imidlertid sit arbejde og modtog arbejdsløshedsunderstøttelse i perioden den 1. august 2008 til den 8. april 2009.
When he lost his job, he received unemployment support between 1.8.2008 and 8.4.2009.
Han er indskrevet i det tyske arbejdsministerium under nummer 459AO40343 Bundesagentur für Arbeit og bor i Wiesbaden.
His registration number in the German Ministry of Work is Bundesagentur 459AO40343 and he lives in Wiesbaden.
Siden april 2009 har han været tilmeldt arbejdsanvisningen i arbejdsministeriet uden løn og understøttelse, og hver måned skal han indlevere bevis for at have ansøgt om ansættelse fem steder.
Since April 2009, he has been registered in the Ministry of Work’s Employment Centre, without salary or support, and every month he is obliged to submit proof of five places where he sought work and failed to find it.
I marts måned fandt han imidlertid to steder, hvor han kunne oplæres i et nyt fag som våbenfabrikant i Luxembourg og i Tyskland.
In March this year, he found two places where he could learn a new profession, as a gunsmith, in Luxembourg and in Germany.
Han tog dertil i Luxembourg, hvor virksomheden var interesseret i at ansætte ham, men de sagde til ham, at de endnu ikke havde fået tilladelse fra Tyskland, fordi de tyske embedsmænd var på ferie.
He went to the place in Luxembourg where the company was interested in taking him on, but was told that they did not yet have authorisation from Germany, thanks to the fact that the German civil servants concerned were on holiday.
De tyske medier har imidlertid bragt oplysninger om, at den tyske stat, som han er bosiddende i, har modtaget EU‑støttemidler for at støtte personer, der er langtidsledige, som det er tilfældet med denne portugisiske statsborger.
Meanwhile, the German media reported that the Bundesland where he lives has been given Community funding to support long-term unemployed people such as himself.
Den portugisiske arbejdstager er desperat og kan ikke forstå holdningen hos den tyske regering, der synes at diskriminere ham.
He is in a state of despair, and the position of the German Government, which appears to be discriminating against him, is incomprehensible.
Kommissionen bedes derfor informere om de foranstaltninger, der er blevet taget eller er planlagt med henblik på at sikre, at denne portugisiske arbejdstagers rettigheder overholdes i Tyskland.
What measures has the Commission taken or is it going to take to ensure that the rights of this Portuguese worker in German are respected?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3219/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3219/10
Det anslås, at der årligt opstår 60 000 nye tilfælde af livmoderhalskræft i hele Europa, der fører til ca. 30 000 dødsfald, hvilket gør denne type kræft til den syvende mest udbredte blandt europæiske kvinder.
An estimated 60000 fresh cases of cervical cancer are detected every year in Europe, which translates into some 30000 deaths, making this cancer the seventh most common amongst European women.
Ifølge statistiske oplysninger fra den seneste foreliggende rapport forelagt af ECCA (»European Cervical Cancer Association«) er vaccinen mod HPV‑virus kun inkluderet i nationale vaccinationsprogrammer i ni ud af de 40 europæiske lande, der er omfattet af undersøgelsen.
According to the statistical data provided in the most recent study available, submitted by the European Cervical Cancer Association, only nine of the 40 European countries involved in the study include the vaccine against human papilloma virus (HPV) in their national vaccination programmes.
Ifølge en international rapport er forekomsten af kræft stigende i Europa.
One international report claims that cancer is on the increase in Europe.
Allerede afholdte screeningsprogrammer har forebygget ca. 80 % af de dødsfald, der forårsages af smitte med HPV‑virus.
The cancer screening programmes already organised have reduced the death rate from human papilloma virus by almost 80 %.
Overlevelsesraterne er markant stigende for de fleste kræftformer, men der er stadig store uligheder i Europa.
The survival rates for most cancers are rising significantly, but there are still major inequalities within Europe.
Findes der nogen form for harmonisering i forbindelse hermed? 3.
Is there any standardisation of the way in which it is being combated?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3220/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3220/10
(7. maj 2010)
(11 May 2010)
Om: EU's klimapolitik efter København: indsættelse af Kyotoenheder
Subject: EU climate policy following the Copenhagen summit: carry-over of assigned amount units under the Kyoto Protocol
I sin meddelelse af 9. marts i år til Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet, Det Europæiske Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg og Regionsudvalget understregede Kommissionen, at indsættelsen af Kyotoenheder ikke tilskynder ilandene til at reducere deres drivhusgasemissioner.
In its communication of 9 March 2010 to the Parliament, Council, Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions, the Commission indicated that arrangements for the carry-over of assigned amount units under the Kyoto Protocol were not providing the industrialised countries with any incentive to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
Hvad bygger Kommissionen sin påstand på?
What are the Commission’s grounds for making such an assertion?
Har Kommissionen foretaget en nøjere undersøgelse?
Has it investigated the matter in detail?
Hvilke andre løsninger kunne der ifølge Kommissionen findes i forbindelse med forhandlingerne efter København for at tilskynde ilandene til at reducere deres emissioner, uden at det krænker den ret, som stater med et stort antal Kyotoenheder har til at anmode om indsættelse af disse i forpligtelsesperioden 2008‑2012?
What alternative solutions does the Commission see as emerging from the post-Copenhagen negotiations with a view to encouraging the industrialised countries to reduce their emissions without prejudice to the rights of countries with a large number of assigned amount units to seek to carry them over beyond the 2008‑12 commitment period?
Hvordan kan Kommissionen støtte denne tilgang i forbindelse med forhandlingerne om FN's rammekonvention om klimaforandringer?
In what way can the Commission support such an approach in the course of negotiations regarding the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3221/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3221/10
Om: Spanien og EU's adfærdskodeks for våbeneksport
Subject: Spain and the European Union Code of Conduct on arms exports
Ifølge en rapport udarbejdet af »Stockholm International Peace Research Institute« (SIPRI) ligger Spanien nr. seks i verden på listen over våbeneksporterende lande i 2009.
According to a report drawn up by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Spain was in sixth place in the world ranking of arms-exporting countries in 2009.
I statistikkerne for årene 2005 til 2009 lå Spanien nr. 8 i verden på listen over lande, der eksporterer tunge våben.
The figures for the years between 2005 and 2009 put Spain in eighth place in terms of exports of heavy weaponry.
Spanien sælger hovedsageligt skibe, lastfly, sensorer og pansrede køretøjer.
Spain chiefly sells ships, cargo planes, sensors and armoured vehicles.
De primære købere af spanske våben i denne periode var USA og Columbia.
The main purchasers of Spanish weaponry over this period were the United States and Colombia.
Men i den omtalte rapport fra SIPRI fremgår salg af håndvåben til Israel.
However, the above SIPRI report does not include sales of light weapons to Israel.
I 2008, måneder før invasionen af Gaza, leverede den spanske regering maskingeværer, fossile brændstoffer, infrarødt udstyr og pistoler til en værdi af 1,5 mio. EUR til Israel.
In 2008, a matter of months before the invasion of Gaza, the Spanish Government provided Israel with machineguns, rifles, infrared equipment and pistols worth EUR 1.5 million.
Salg af våben til lande som Israel, Columbia og USA er en klar overtrædelse af kriterium 4 i EU's adfærdskodeks for våbeneksport (8675/2/98), hvor det specificeres, at »medlemsstaterne udsteder ikke en eksporttilladelse, hvis der foreligger en klar risiko for, at den påtænkte modtager vil anvende de potentielle eksportvarer aggressivt mod et andet land eller til at forsvare et territorialt krav med magt«, samt af kriterium 2 om respekt for menneskerettighederne i det endelige modtagerland, ifølge hvilket der ikke udstedes en eksporttilladelse, hvis der foreligger en klar risiko for »tortur og anden grusom, umenneskelig og nedværdigende behandling eller straf, summariske eller vilkårlige henrettelser, forsvindinger, vilkårlige arrestationer, og andre alvorlige krænkelser af menneskerettighederne og de grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder«.
The sale of arms to countries such as Israel, Colombia and the United States is in clear breach of Criterion Four of the European Union Code of Conduct on arms exports (8675/2/98), which states that ‘Member States will not issue an export licence if there is a clear risk that the intended recipient would use the proposed export aggressively against another country or to assert by force a territorial claim’, and of Criterion Two on the respect of human rights in the country of final destination, according to which no export licence will be issued if there is a clear risk of ‘torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, summary or arbitrary executions, disappearances, arbitrary detentions and other major violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms’.
I lyset af at Spanien eksporterer våben til lande som Israel, Columbia og USA, hvor international lovgivning ikke overholdes, og hvor der sker klare overtrædelser af menneskerettighederne: —
Given that Spain is exporting arms to countries such as Israel, Colombia and the United States, which act in breach of international law and in which flagrant violations of human rights are committed, can the Council answer the following questions: —
Hvilken holdning har Rådet til Spaniens overtrædelse af EU's adfærdskodeks for våbeneksport, især med hensyn til kriterium 2 og 4? —
What is the Council's position on Spain's violation of the European Union Code of Conduct on arms exports, specifically Criteria Two and Four? —
Hvad har EU foretaget for at sikre, at medlemsstaterne, og mere konkret Spanien, anvender kriterierne i denne aftale?
What steps has the European Union taken to ensure that Member States, specifically Spain, apply the criteria laid down in this agreement?
Det ærede medlem gøres opmærksom på, at Rådet den 8. december 2008 vedtog fælles holdning 2008/944/FUSP om fælles regler for kontrol med eksport af militærteknologi og -udstyr EUT L 335 af 13.12.2008, s. 99. .
The Honourable Member is reminded that on 8 December 2008 the Council adopted Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment OJ L 335, 13.12.2008, p.
Den indeholder flere nye elementer, herunder skærpede procedurer for at harmonisere medlemsstaternes eksportpolitikker.
It includes several new elements, including strengthened procedures in order to harmonise Member States' export policies.
Som svar på det ærede medlems spørgsmål kan det oplyses, at den fælles holdning har til formål at sikre hensigtsmæssig og konvergerende anvendelse af kriterierne, navnlig ved
In answer to his questions, the Honourable Member is informed that the common position aims to ensure appropriate and convergent application of the criteria, in particular: —
at medlemsstaterne i henhold til artikel 4 udsender nærmere oplysninger om ansøgninger, der er blevet nægtet, tillige med en forklaring på, hvorfor tilladelsen er blevet nægtet.
in accordance with Article 4, Member States circulate details of applications which have been denied, together with an explanation of why the licence has been denied.
Inden en medlemsstat udsteder en tilladelse, som er blevet nægtet af en anden medlemsstat eller andre medlemsstater for en i det væsentlige identisk transaktion inden for de seneste tre år, hører den først den eller de medlemsstater, som har nægtet at give tilladelse.
Before any Member State grants a licence which has been denied by another Member State or States for an essentially identical transaction within the last three years, it shall consult the Member State or States which issued the denial(s).
Hvis medlemsstaten efter konsultationer alligevel beslutter at udstede en tilladelse, underretter den den eller de medlemsstater, der har nægtet at give tilladelse, og forklarer sin begrundelse udførligt.
If, following consultations the Member State nevertheless decides to grant a licence, it shall notify the Member State or States issuing the denials(s), giving a detailed explanation if its reasoning.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3222/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3222/10
I lyset af at Spanien eksporterer våben til lande som Israel, Columbia og USA, hvor international lovgivning ikke overholdes, og hvor der sker klare overtrædelser af menneskerettighederne: —
Given that Spain is exporting arms to countries such as Israel, Colombia and the United States, which act in breach of international law and in which flagrant violations of human rights are committed, can the Commission answer the following questions: —
Hvilken holdning har Kommissionen til Spaniens overtrædelse af EU's adfærdskodeks for våbeneksport, især med hensyn til kriterium 2 og 4? —
What is the Commission's position on Spain's violation of the European Union Code of Conduct on arms exports, specifically Criteria Two and Four? —
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3223/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3223/10
Om: Sletning af indsamlede data — Facebook m.fl.
Subject: Deleting data — Facebook et al.
De seneste meningsmålinger viser, at 60 % af østrigerne beskæftiger sig med sociale netværk (f.eks. Facebook, Mein VZ, Netlog, Szene 1 etc.).
According to the latest surveys, 60 % of Austrians are on social networks (Facebook, Mein VZ, Netlog, Szene 1, etc.).
Her bliver der ikke kun givet udtryk for holdninger og fortalt mangt og meget fra privatlivet, men billeder bliver ofte letsindigt lagt ud på nettet.
On these networks people not only express their opinions and talk about their private lives but also post pictures on the Internet without giving it a second thought.
Det, man ubekymret lagde ud på nettet i festligt lag eller som ung, kan være uønsket i ædru tilstand, eller når man bliver ældre.
We may casually make such things public when in a party mood or in our youth, but then regret it in the cold light of day or later in life.
Undersøgelser foretaget af forbrugerbeskyttelsesorganisationer har vist, at det er meget vanskeligt eller nærmest umuligt at slette data i cyberspace.
Research by consumer protection organisations has indicated that it is difficult, if not impossible, to delete data in cyberspace.
Det er således f.eks. svært at finde slettefunktionen, og operatører af platforme informerer stort set ikke om, hvor omfattende en sletning er.
For example, the delete function can be difficult to find and platform operators provide little information on the extent to which the data are actually deleted.
I nogle tilfælde bliver kun linket til profilen afbrudt, men dermed opretholdes brugernavn og indlæg.
Sometimes the data will just be removed from the relevant profile, leaving usernames and contributions intact.
Databeskyttelsesretligt er Google Street Views aktiviteter også betænkelige, da den efterfølgende klageret, som tvinger de berørte til aktivt at lokalisere de pågældende objekter på nettet, sikkert er uegnet til i tilstrækkelig grad at beskytte privatsfæren og retten til uformel selvbestemmelse.
In data protection terms, the activities of Google Street View are also a matter for concern, as the right to object after images have been posted requires the person in question actively to pinpoint the location of the objects on the Internet; this certainly does not adequately protect privacy or a person's right to determine the use to which his/her personal data are put.
Hvad er Kommissionens holdning til sociale netværks dataindsamling, og har Den Europæiske Tilsynsførende for Databeskyttelse en officiel holdning til problemet?
What is the Commission's position with regard to data collection by social networks, and does the European Data Protection Supervisor have an official position on this?
I hvilket omfang berører databeskyttelsen på internettet EU‑reglerne?
To what extent does EC law cover data protection on the Internet?
Findes der på EU‑plan planer for at tilskynde sociale netværk, Google Street View m.fl. til at finde bedre muligheder for at slette data?
Are there plans at EU level to prevail upon social networks, Google Street View, etc. to improve their delete functions?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3224/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3224/10
Om: Aktivering af hjælpeprogrammet til støtte af græsk økonomi og urimelig skattemæssig konkurrence inden for EU
Subject: Unfair tax competition within the EU and activation of the aid mechanism to support the Greek economy
Den græske regering anmodede for få dage siden om at få aktiveret hjælpeprogrammet, der blev oprettet for at støtte græsk økonomi.
A few days ago the Greek Government called for the activation of the aid mechanism established in order to support the Greek economy.
Eftersom den græske regering har forsøgt at begrænse de offentlige udgifter og har ladet skatteprocenterne stige, hvilket den har meddelt og kundgjort over for de ansvarlige tjenestegrene, og under henvisning til det faktum, at Grækenland, ligesom andre lande i eurozonen, samtidig står over for alvorlige finansielle problemer og alvorlige konkurrencemæssige problemer, bedes Rådet oplyse følgende:
Given the attempt to cut public sector spending and increase the tax rates announced by the Greek Government which it has already notified to the relevant services and bearing in mind the fact that Greece, as well as other eurozone countries, is facing a combination of serious budgetary and competitiveness problems, will the Council say: