natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvilke skridt har Kommissionen taget for at få de græske myndigheder til at indstille de ulovlige affaldsforbrændinger inden udgangen af året i overensstemmelse med EF-domstolens dom?
What measures has the Commission introduced to persuade the Greek authorities to comply with the ECJ judgment and stop illegal waste incineration by the end of the year?
Er det korrekt, at Kommissionen vil give de græske myndigheder en frist på yderligere to år til at efterleve dommen?
Is it true that the Commission intends to give the Greek authorities an extra two years to comply with the judgment?
Med hvilken begrundelse overvejes denne forlængede frist?
What is the reasoning behind this extension of the deadline?
I hvilket omfang tages der ved en sådan beslutning højde for de ødelæggende, negative økologiske konsekvenser af den ulovlige affaldsforbrænding?
To what extent are the devastating negative ecological consequences of illegal waste incineration taken into account in reaching such a decision?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4472/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4472/08
I tyske aviser indrykkes der annoncer med overskriften »Bruxelles har noget tilovers for os: Ni mia. euro«.
German newspapers are carrying an advertisement entitled ‘Brussels likes us: EUR 9 billion proves it’.
Under overskriften står der: »EU er social.
The following appears under the title: ‘Europe is socially oriented.
Denne information er til alle, der tror, at EU bare koster ekstra«.
This information is for everyone who thinks that Europe is only about paying more’.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med disse annoncer og indholdet i dem?
Is the Commission aware of these advertisements and what they contain?
Er Kommissionen af den opfattelse, at EU kun er »social«, når EU-borgerne også modtager EU-midler?
Does the Commission think that Europe is only ‘social’ when EU citizens also receive EU money?
Bærer Kommissionen omkostningerne for disse annoncer?
Does the Commission pay for such advertisements?
Hvis omkostningerne ikke bæres af Kommissionen, kan omkostningerne for disse annoncer da betales med midler fra Den Europæiske Socialfond for Tyskland?
If the cost is not met by the Commission, can the cost of such advertisements be covered by the European Social Fund for Germany?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4473/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4473/08
Om: Bilateral aftale med Schweiz om fri bevægelighed — forskelsbehandling af virksomheder med hovedsæde i EU
Subject: Bilateral agreement with Switzerland on freedom of movement — discrimination against companies based in the EU
Den 1. juni 2002 trådte den bilaterale aftale om fri bevægelighed mellem EU og Schweiz i kraft.
On 1 June 2002 the bilateral agreement between the EU and Switzerland on freedom of movement came into force.
En lang række virksomheder fra de tilgrænsende regioner støder imidlertid på diskriminerende og uforholdsmæssige hindringer, når de påberåber sig deres rettigheder i henhold til denne aftale.
When taking advantage of their rights arising from the agreement, however, many companies from neighbouring regions come up against discriminatory, disproportionate hurdles.
Således skal arbejdsgivere med hovedsæde i EU foretage en anmeldelse med detaljerede oplysninger forud for at starte aktiviteten i Schweiz.
Employers based in the EU, for example, must submit a report containing detailed information before they commence their activities in Switzerland.
Den schweiziske lovgivning retter sig eksplicit mod udenlandske virksomheder og overtræder dermed ikke kun forbuddet mod restriktioner i den frie bevægelighed i denne aftale, men også diskriminationsforbuddet.
The Swiss regulations are expressly designed to penalise foreign companies and therefore infringe not only the prohibition on restrictions of the above agreement but also the principle of non‑discrimination.
Endvidere må der ifølge den schweiziske forbundslov om arbejdsformidling og vikararbejde kun anvendes arbejdskraft fra schweiziske vikarbureauer.
Moreover, under the Swiss federal law on staff recruitment and placement, only workers supplied by Swiss personnel placement agencies may be employed.
Dette forbud mod at udføre selv simple montageydelser med vikarer gør det umuligt at drive virksomhed i Schweiz inden for mange områder, navnlig bierhverv inden for byggebranchen, og udgør en begrænsning af den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser.
This prohibition on using temporary workers even for simple assembly work makes it impossible for companies to set up in Switzerland in many sectors, particularly in the ancillary building trade, and constitutes a restriction on the freedom to provide services.
Ingen af bestemmelserne bidrager til at beskytte arbejdsmarkedet eller arbejdstagerne.
These two rules contribute neither to protecting the labour market nor to worker protection.
Hvilke mekanismer fastsætter den bilaterale aftale ved overtrædelser, og har disse mekanismer indtil nu vist sig at kunne løse problemerne effektivt?
What countermeasures do the bilateral agreements provide for in the case of infringements, and have they thus far been at all effective in solving these problems?
Hvilke modforanstaltninger eller sanktionsmekanismer foreslår Kommissionen for at få Schweiz til at gennemføre aftalen mellem dette land og EU korrekt?
What remedial measures or sanction mechanisms does the Commission suggest in order to persuade Switzerland properly to implement the agreements which it has so far concluded with the EU?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4474/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4474/08
Om: En mulig overtrædelse af EU-lovgivningen om små virksomheder
Subject: Potential breach of the Small Business Act
Har Kommissionen kendskab til aktiviteterne i det tyske GEMA, der varetager opkrævning af royalties?
Is the Commission aware of the activities of the German royalty collection scheme, GEMA?
GEMA diskriminerer tilsyneladende ikketyske virksomheder, der handler med flash-drev og mp 3-afspillere, idet virksomheder skal have registrerede kontorer i landet for at kunne lade sig registrere til GEMA-afgiften.
GEMA seems to be discriminating against those non-German companies dealing in flash-drives and MP3 players, by refusing to allow companies without registered offices in the country to register for GEMA tax.
Selskabet anfører som begrundelse herfor, at det ikke ønsker at jagte misligholdende virksomheder uden for Tyskland.
According to the company itself, this is because it does not wish to have to chase those defaulting in countries outside of Germany.
For mindre ikketyske virksomheder, der eksporterer disse produkter til Tyskland, er det meget frustrerende, og virksomhederne vil, hvis de lader sig registrere i Tyskland, faktisk overgå fra at være eksportvirksomheder (f.eks. fra Det Forenede Kongerige eller andre steder i Europa uden for Tyskland) til importvirksomheder.
For smaller, non-German companies exporting these products to Germany this is extremely off-putting, and by registering in Germany such companies would in effect be shifting from exporters (e.g. from the UK or wherever else in Europe outside of Germany) to importers.
Som en følge heraf vil virksomhederne foretrække at bruge en indenlandsk leverandør, hvilket forringer deres konkurrenceevne i EU.
These companies will thus prefer to place their business with a domestic supplier instead, and this puts them at a distinct disadvantage commercially in the EU.
Hvordan stemmer en så diskriminerende aktivitet overens med den for nyligt vedtagne EU-lovgivning om små virksomheder?
How does such discriminatory activity sit alongside the recently adopted Small Business Act?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4475/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4475/08
Om: Kvinders rettigheder i Etiopien
Subject: Women's rights in Ethiopia
Hvordan vil Kommissionen vurdere sine resultater, når det gælder om at fremme kvinders rettigheder i Etiopien?
How would the Commission rate its success in promoting and enforcing women’s rights in Ethiopia?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4476/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4476/08
Om: Fattigdom blandt voksne i EU
Subject: Adult poverty in the EU
Hvorfor lever 16 % af den voksne befolkning i EU i fattigdom?
Why is 16 % of the adult population of the EU living in poverty?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4477/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4477/08
Skammer Kommissionen sig ikke over, at 19 mio. børn i det velstående EU lever i fattigdom?
Is the Commission not ashamed of the fact that 19 million children live in poverty in the prosperous EU?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4478/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4478/08
Om: Børnefattigdom i Det Forenede Kongerige
Subject: Child poverty in the UK
Kan Kommissionen i forlængelse af min skriftlige forespørgsel E-2890/08 og E-2981/08 forklare, hvorfor Det Forenede Kongerige er det syvendedårligst placerede land af de 27 medlemsstater, når det gælder børnefattigdom?
Further to the Commission’s answer to my Questions E‑2890/08 and E‑2981/08, can it explain why the UK has the seventh worst record amongst the 27 Member States, for the incidence of child poverty?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4479/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4479/08
Om: Udryddelse af børnefattigdom
Subject: Eliminating child poverty
Hvornår skønner Kommissionen, at børnefattigdom vil være udryddet i EU?
When does the Commission expect to see the elimination of child poverty in the EU?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4480/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4480/08
Om: Lige muligheder for alle børn
Subject: Equal opportunities for all children
Hvornår regner Kommissionen med, at alle børn i EU får lige muligheder uanset deres sociale baggrund?
When does the Commission expect all the children of the EU to have ‘equal opportunities, regardless of their social background’?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4481/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4481/08
Om: Skamfering og afskæring af kvinders kønsdele i Etiopien
Subject: Female genital mutilation and cutting in Ethiopia
Mener Kommissionen, at dens projekter i Etiopien har nedbragt forekomsten af skamfering og afskæring af kvinders kønsdele?
Does the Commission believe that its projects in Ethiopia have reduced the incidence of female genital mutilation and cutting?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4482/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4482/08
Har Kommissionen foretaget en vurdering af, hvilket udfald en folkeafstemning i Det Forenede Kongerige om ratificering af Lissabontraktaten vil få?
Has the Commission made any study of the likely outcome of a referendum in the UK on ratifying the Lisbon Treaty?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4483/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4483/08
Om: Mord på kristne i Mosul og provinsen Nineveh
Subject: Murder of Christians in Mosul and Nineveh Plains
Vil Kommissionen nu besvare den skriftlige forespørgsel E-3497/08 , hvori den anmodes om at undersøge påstandene om, at de kurdiske Peshmerga-militser var ansvarlige for anholdelse, tortur og drab på kristne i Mosul og provinsen Nineveh?
Will the Commission now answer Question E‑3497/08 asking it to investigate allegations that the Kurdish Peshmerga militants have been responsible for the arrest, torture and murder of Christians in Mosul and the Ninevah Plains?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4484/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4484/08
Om: Nedbringelse af børnefattigdom
Subject: Reducing child poverty
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4485/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4485/08
En nylig undersøgelse, som er foretaget af et italiensk neurovidenskabeligt institut og gengivet i ugeskriftet Newsweek af 12. april 2008, lader til at understøtte formodningen om, at Botox, et stof, som indførtes på verdensmarkedet i slutningen af 1980'erne i skønhedssektoren og i andre sektorer, er ekstremt skadeligt for menneskers nervesystem.
A recent scientific investigation carried out by an Italian neuroscience institute and reported on in the 12 April 2008 edition of Newsweek appears to provide further support for the belief that Botox — a substance introduced on to the world's markets at the end of the 1980s in the cosmetics and other sectors — is highly damaging to the human neurological system.
Botox indvirker nemlig ikke kun på den pågældende kropsdel, men spreder sig til hele kroppen, herunder hjernen.
This is because Botox does not only act exclusively on the part of the body to which it is applied — it progresses through the entire body until it reaches the brain.
Det har da også til alle tider været almindeligt kendt, at Botox er et kraftigt giftstof, og selv om de prækliniske test gav negative resultater, viser data, som er indsamlet i de senere år, at i perioden 1989-2003 døde 28 personer, som havde fået indsprøjtet mængder af Botox i medicinsk øjemed.
It has always been known that Botox is a powerful poison and even though the pre-clinical trials proved negative, data collected over the last few years show that, between 1989 and 2003, 28 people to whom quantities of Botox had been administered for medical purposes died.
Kommissionen bedes på baggrund af oplysningerne i en lang række skriftlige forespørgsler, som den har modtaget, besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
In the light of what has been stated in the many written questions which have been tabled to the Commission, will the Commission answer the following questions?
Finder den det ikke hensigtsmæssigt, at der nedsættes et undersøgelsesudvalg, som indhenter oplysninger fra medlemsstaterne, der kan bringe klarhed over de potentielle risici, som Botox kan medføre for mennesker?
Does the Commission not think that a committee of inquiry should be set up for the purpose of obtaining information from the Member States which could shed light on the potential risks of Botox to human beings?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4486/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4486/08
Om: Nærmere oplysninger om den korrekte gennemførelse af direktiv 1999/70/EF i slovensk ret
Subject: Further information concerning the proper incorporation of Directive 1999/70/EC into Slovene law
I sit svar af 25. april 2008 på forespørgsel E-1435/08 oplyste Kommissionen, at den havde skrevet til de slovenske myndigheder for at indhente oplysninger og præciseringer vedrørende den nationale lovgivning, som regulerer tidsbegrænset arbejde i kultursektoren.
In its reply of 25 April 2008 to Question E‑1435/08 the Commission said that it had written to the Slovene authorities for information and clarification regarding the national law governing fixed-term employment in the cultural sector, and that once a reply had been received it would assess whether or not Directive 1999/70/EC OJ L 175, 10.7.1999, p.
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter den at træffe over for Slovenien, såfremt den slovenske lovgivning skulle være i strid med direktiv 1999/70/EF?
What action does the Commission intend to take vis-à-vis Slovenia if Slovene law proves to be incompatible with Directive 1999/70/EC?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4487/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4487/08
Om: NTDTV — kinesisk tv-kanal censureres af Eutelsat
Subject: Chinese-language TV channel NTDTV censored by Eutelsat
Det er for nylig blevet oplyst, at Eutelsat har bremset udsendelse af den kinesisksprogede tv-kanal NTDTV på sin W5-satellit, der sender til Asien.
It has recently been reported that Eutelsat has banned the Chinese-language TV channel NTDTV from its W5 satellite broadcasts to Asia.
Selv om der oprindeligt anførtes tekniske grunde, er det via en kontakt, som sammenslutningen Journalister Uden Grænser har haft, blevet bekræftet, at der er tale om en politisk beslutning, der bevidst er truffet for at tilfredsstille myndighederne i Beijing.
Technical reasons were invoked as a pretext, but information obtained from a contact at ‘Reporters Sans Frontières’ (RSF) has confirmed that this was a premeditated political decision aimed at satisfying Beijing.
Allerede i 2005 forsøgte denne europæiske virksomhed at stoppe udsendelserne, men en international kampagne foranledigede Eutelsat til at indgå en langtidsaftale med NTDTV.
Eutelsat had already, in 2005, tried to ban this channel's broadcasts, but an international campaign induced it to reconsider its position and sign a long-term contract with NTDTV.
Eutelsats foranstaltning over for NTDTV er ud over at udgøre en overtrædelse af de grundlæggende rettigheder, der er indskrevet i de europæiske forfatninger og i en lang række internationale overenskomster, også i strid med artikel 3 i Eutelsats egen statut.
Eutelsat's action against NTDTV is contrary to the fundamental rights enshrined in European countries' constitutions and in numerous international instruments, and is also in breach of Article 3 of its own Convention.
Har Kommissionen kendskab til de nævnte forhold?
Is the Commission aware of these facts?
Hvilke skridt vil Kommissionen tage for at beskytte informationsfriheden, især retten til frit at formidle oplysninger?
What action will the Commission take to defend freedom of information and, in particular, the right to the free circulation of information?
Hvad kan Kommissionen foretage sig for at formå Eutelsat til at overholde sin egen statut og afholde sig fra at udøve vilkårlig censur?
What measures can the Commission take to ensure that Eutelsat abides by its own Convention and abstains from operating arbitrary forms of censorship?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4488/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4488/08
Om: Oversættelse til katalansk
Subject: Translation into Catalan
Jeg er blevet orienteret om, at dette vil koste 1 mia. euro, hvormed EU's årlige udgifter til dette formål vil andrage 500 mio. euro.
It appears that the annual cost of this practice is EUR 1 billion (EUR 500 million to the EU budget).
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4495/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4495/08
Om: Israels krænkelser af Mohammed Omers og Ashraf Abu Rahmas værdighed og menneskerettigheder
Subject: Mohamed Omer's and Ashraf Abu Rahma's dignity and human rights violated by Israel
24-årige Mohammed Omer, som er palæstinensisk statsborger, er den yngste journalist, der har modtaget Martha Gellhorn-prisen.
Mohamed Omer — a 24-year-old Palestinian — is the youngest journalist to be awarded the Martha Gellhorn prize.
Takket være forvaltningerne ved den hollandske ambassade gav de israelske myndigheder Mohammed Omer lov til at rejse fra Gaza til London for at modtage prisen den 16. juni 2008.
On 16 June 2008 — thanks to intervention by the Dutch Embassy — the Israeli authorities allowed him to leave Gaza and to travel to London in order to receive the prize.
Da han rejste tilbage den 26. juni, udviklede situationen sig til et mareridt, hvilket også er beskrevet af den internationale presse.
As recounted in the international press, however, his return journey on 26 June turned into a nightmare.
Det britiske underhus, det svenske parlament, universitetet i Rotterdam og journalistforeningen i Grækenland har anerkendt Mohammed Omers arbejde og professionalisme og har inviteret ham til at holde foredrag om situationen i Gaza.
The UK's House of Commons, the Swedish Parliament, Rotterdam University and the Union of Greek Journalists have acknowledged his work and his professionalism and have invited him to lecture on the situation in Gaza.
Israel nedværdiger sig selv ved at behandle Mohammed Omer på denne måde.
By treating Mohamed Omer in such a way, Israel is debasing itself.
Ashraf Abu Rahma er 27 år og fra Palæstina.
Ashraf Abu Rahma is a 27-year-old Palestinian.
I begyndelsen af juli 2008 deltog han i en fredelig demonstration mod Israels apartheidmur i Nilín i Egypten.
In early July 2008 he engaged in a peaceful demonstration in the West Bank town of Nilin, against the Israeli Wall of Shame.
Abu Rahma blev anholdt, lagt i håndjern og ydmyget.
He was arrested, handcuffed and humiliated.
Soldaten har forklaret, at officeren tvang ham til at skyde palæstinenseren.
The soldier has stated that the official obliged him to shoot Ashraf Abu Rahma.
Israel ydmyger sig selv ved at tillade disse krænkelser.
In permitting such abuses, Israel is humiliating itself.
Har Rådet noteret sig de anførte hændelser, således at det på næste møde mellem EU og Israel kan minde sidstnævnte om, at sådanne handlinger ikke accepteres i det Europa, som Tel Aviv ønsker at samarbejde bredt med på højeste niveau?
Has the Council taken note of these incidents, so that at the next EU‑Israel meeting it can remind Israel that such behaviour is unacceptable in a Europe with which Tel Aviv says it wishes to establish closer links at the highest levels?
Rådet har noteret sig de begivenheder, som er beskrevet i forespørgslen fra det ærede parlamentsmedlem, og som vedrører de to palæstinensere, Mohamed Omer og Ashraf Abu Rahma.
The Council has taken note of the events relating to the two Palestinians Mohamed Omer and Ashraf Abu Rahma and described in the question put by the Honourable Member of the European Parliament.
I sin tale i Europa-Parlamentet i Strasbourg den 9. juli 2008 oplyste Jean-Pierre Jouyet, statssekretær for europæiske anliggender, at Rådet var bekendt med den betænkelige menneskerettighedssituation i Mellemøsten.
In his speech to the European Parliament in Strasbourg on 9 July 2008, Mr Jean-Pierre Jouyet, the French Minister of State with responsibility for European Affairs, said that the Council was aware of the worrying state of the human rights situation in the Middle East.
Med henblik herpå kommer man i dialogen mellem EU og Israel ind på alle menneskerettighedsspørgsmål, herunder også i de palæstinensiske områder, der drøftes til stadighed på alle niveauer under de politiske kontakter mellem EU og Israel.
In this respect, the dialogue between the European Union and Israel covers the full range of human rights issues, including in the Palestinian territories, which are regularly discussed at all levels during political contacts between the Union and Israel.
I sin erklæring af 16. juni 2008, der blev afgivet ved afslutningen af mødet i Associeringsrådet med Israel, anmodede EU således om og fik også gennemført, at den uformelle gruppe, der behandler menneskerettighedsspørgsmålet, blev omdannet til et fast underudvalg.
In its statement of 16 June 2008, following the Association Council with Israel, the European Union called for and obtained the transformation of the informal working group on human rights into a fully fledged subcommittee.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4496/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4496/08
Om: Narkotikasmugling fra Iran
Subject: Smuggled narcotics from Iran
Det hedder i »The Independent« af 13. juli:
According to the Independent of 13 July:
»Den øgede spænding mellem Iran og Vesten har taget en ny drejning efter afsløringen af, at den britiske flåde og de allierede styrker har beslaglagt smuglergods udskibet i iranske havne i form af narkotika til en værdi af over 800 mio. britiske pund.
‘Worsening tension between Iran and the West has been given a new twist by the revelation that the Royal Navy and allied forces have intercepted smuggled narcotics worth more than GBP 800 million coming out of Iranian ports.
Det hævdes, at mange af pengene tjener til at finansiere Taliban i Afghanistan«.
Much of the money, it is claimed, helps to fund the Taliban in Afghanistan’.
I en årrække har jeg gentagne gange anmodet Europa-Kommissionen om at tilføje narkohandel til rækken af stridsemner i forhold til de iranske myndigheder, da det har været klart for enhver uafhængig observatør, at Iran udgør et af verdens største handelscentre for opiumrelaterede produkter.
For a number of years I have been repeatedly asking the European Commission to place narcotic traffic as one of the contentious issues with the Iranian authorities, as it has been obvious to any sort of independent observer that Iran is among the main world trading platforms for opium-related products.
Jeg er imidlertid systematisk blevet konfronteret med Europa-Kommissionens påstand om, at Iran og EU havde en fælles interesse i at bekæmpe narkotikahandel.
However, I have been systematically confronted with the European Commission's claim that Iran and the European Union had a joint common interest in combating drug traffic.
Vil Europa-Kommissionen endeligt ændre holdning til Irans rolle i narkohandelen?
Will the European Commission finally change its opinion regarding the role of Iran in drugs traffic?
Er Kommissionen enig i, at betydningen af at bekæmpe narkotikaafhængighed bør veje højere end eventuelle diplomatiske hensyn, uanset om disse er solidt begrundet, for at stille de iranske myndigheder til ansvar?
Does the Commission agree that the importance of the fight against narcotic addition should outweigh any diplomatic considerations, even if solidly based, to engage the Iranian authorities?