natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I Colombia, som er den næststørste eksportør i verden af afskårne blomster, og hvor over 150.000 personer er beskæftiget med blomsterdyrkning i godt 450 brug med en anslået årlig omsætning på 580 mio. dollars, har undersøgelser fra det colombianske selskab for landbrugsforskning vist, at grundvandet i det område, hvor 94 % af de blomster, der er beregnet til eksport, dyrkes i drivhuse, skulle være faldet med 50 %.
From the environmental point of view, the picture is just as appalling: in Colombia, the world’s second largest exporter of cut flowers, where flower growing provides work for more than 150 000 people on nearly 450 farms and generates an estimated turnover of USD 580 million, studies conducted by the Colombian Agricultural Research Society have shown that in the region where 94 % of flowers for export are grown under glass, groundwater has decreased by 50 %.
Der anvendes til drivhusene gratis en mængde vand, der kan forsyne 600.000 personer, mens kommunerne har problemer med vandmangel.
The quantity of water that the glasshouses use free of charge would be enough for 600 000 people, and this is at a time when municipalities are facing water shortages.
Dertil kommer en katastrofal kulstofbalance.
Added to that, the carbon balance is disastrous.
Endvidere har gødning forurenet flere vandløb og store jordarealer, jorden bliver ufrugtbar, der oparbejdes fast og giftigt affald, områdets økosystem påvirkes af monokultur, og der indføres gmo'er i plantagerne.
Furthermore, fertilisers have contaminated several watercourses and large expanses of soil, land is becoming infertile, toxic solid waste is being produced, the regional ecosystem is being damaged by monocultures, and GMOs are being released on the plantations.
Selv om der er sket forbedringer i de seneste år, bl.a. økologisk og social certificering, ser de ud til at være begrænsede.
Although some improvements have taken place in recent years, not least ecological and social certification, they still, apparently, do not amount to much.
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, hvordan blomsterdyrkningsindustrien udvikler sig i Sydamerika og Afrika.
Can the Commission say what is currently happening in the South American and African cut flower industries?
Mener Kommissionen, at det er nødvendigt at lægge pres på regeringer og producenter for at få dem til at overholde love og konventioner?
Does it believe that pressure needs to be brought to bear on governments and producers to make them comply with laws and agreements?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8360/2010
Question for written answer E-8360/2010
Om: Multi Donor Trust Funds i Afghanistan
Subject: Multi-donor trust funds in Afghanistan
Kommissionen er som bekendt en af de vigtigste donorer i de såkaldte Multi Donor Trust Funds, som forvaltes af internationale organisationer som FN og Verdensbanken.
It is well-known that the Commission is one of the most important donors to the multi‑donor trust funds managed by international organisations such as the UN and the World Bank.
Hvor stor er andelen af EU-midler i Afghanistan, som indgår i Multi Donor Trust Funds?
How high is the proportion of EU money in Afghanistan that goes into multi‑donor trust funds?
Hvor stort var dette beløb i euro i årene 2010, 2009, 2008 og 2007?
How high was this sum in euros in 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007?
Hvilke internationale organisationer blev disse midler forvaltet af?
Which international organisations managed this money?
Hvor mange EU-midler til Afghanistan blev forvaltet af hver enkelt internationale organisation i de nævnte fire år?
How much of the EU money for Afghanistan was managed by each individual international organisation in the abovementioned four years?
Hvordan sikrer man gennemsigtighed i internationale organisationers forvaltning af EU's Trust Funds i Afghanistan?
How is transparency in the management of EU trust funds in Afghanistan by international organisations being guaranteed?
Kommer der regelmæssige rapporter fra de internationale organisationer, som klart beskriver, hvordan EU-midlerne i Afghanistan bliver forvaltet, herunder udgifter til sikkerhed og forvaltning?
Are there regular reports from international organisations which clearly show how EU money in Afghanistan is being managed, including security and administrative costs?
Hvor ofte bliver der i givet fald fremlagt sådanne rapporter, hvor bliver de offentliggjort, og har medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet indsigt i dem?
If so, how often are such reports submitted, where are they published and do MEPs have access to them?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8361/2010
Question for written answer E-8361/2010
Om: Udvidelse af Det Fælles Situationscenter
Subject: Expansion of the Joint Situation Centre (SitCen)
Ifølge et organigram fra den europæiske udenrigstjeneste skal det nuværende Fælles Situationscenter (SitCen) udvides gennem en sammenlægning med Kommissionens »Crisis Room«.
According to an organigram for the European external action service, the current Joint Situation Centre (SitCen) is being expanded through a merger with the Commission's Crisis Room.
Desuden berettes det i medierne, at den såkaldte Watchkeeping Capability ligeledes skal integreres i situationscentret.
In addition, it is reported in the media that the Watchkeeping Capability is also being incorporated into the SitCen.
Fusionerer de to ovennævnte enheder virkelig med situationscentret?
Are the two abovementioned units really being merged with the SitCen?
Hvornår vil denne fusion i givet fald være afsluttet?
If so, when will the merger be completed?
Hvor stort var budgettet for Det Fælles Situationscenter i årene 2007, 2008, 2009 og 2010?
How high was the SitCen's budget in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010?
Hvilke konsekvenser har udvidelsen af Det Fælles Situationscenter for så vidt angår størrelsen af centrets budget?
What impact will the expansion of the SitCen have in relation to the level of the SitCen's budget?
Hvor stort er budgettet for det udvidede situationscenter i årene 2011 og 2012?
How high is the budget for the expanded SitCen in 2011 and 2012?
Hvor mange medarbejdere var der ansat i situationscentret i 2007, 2008, 2009 og 2010?
How many staff were employed by the SitCen in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010?
Hvilke konsekvenser har udvidelsen af Det Fælles Situationscenter for så vidt angår størrelsen af centrets personale?
What impact will the expansion of the SitCen have in relation to staffing levels in the SitCen?
Hvor mange medarbejdere vil der være ansat i det udvidede situationscenter i 2011 og 2012?
How many staff will the expanded SitCen employ in 2011 and 2012?
Kan Rådet fremlægge et organigram for den interne struktur i situationscentret både før udvidelsen og efter udvidelsen?
Could the Council provide an organigram for the SitCen's internal structure both prior to the expansion and following the expansion?
Hvilken merværdi giver de to ovennævnte enheders fusionering med situationscentret?
What added value will the merger of the two abovementioned units with the SitCen bring?
Får situationscentret nye kompetencer med udvidelsen?
Will the SitCen obtain new powers as a result of the expansion?
Hvis ja, hvilke?
If so, what new powers?
Med hensyn til spørgsmål nr. 5 er antallet af ansatte i SITCEN som følger:
With regard to question 5, the number of staff employed by SITCEN is as follows:
2007: 12 AD og 37 AST
2007: 12 AD and 37 AST
2008: 20 AD og 44 AST
2008: 20 AD and 44 AST
2009: 35 AD og 48 AST
2009: 35 AD and 48 AST
2010: 41 AD og 51 AST.
2010: 41 AD and 51 AST.
Situationscentret er fremover en del af Tjenesten for EU's Optræden Udadtil (EU‑Udenrigstjenesten).
SITCEN is now part of the European External Action Service (EEAS).
Det fastsættes i artikel 4, stk. 3, litra a), i Rådets afgørelse 2010/427/EU af 26. juli 2010 om, hvordan Tjenesten for EU's Optræden Udadtil skal tilrettelægges og fungere, at EU‑Udenrigstjenestens centraladministration bl.a. omfatter EU's Situationscenter, der er placeret under Unionens højtstående repræsentant for udenrigsanliggender og sikkerhedspolitiks direkte myndighed og ansvar.
Article 4(3)(a) of Council Decision 2010/427/EU of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service provides that the central administration of the EEAS shall include, inter alia , the European Union Situation Centre, placed under the direct authority and responsibility of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.
Det hedder også i denne artikel, at »de særlige forhold i forbindelse med disse strukturer og de nærmere enkeltheder vedrørende deres funktioner samt personalets ansættelse og status respekteres«.
According to the same article, ‘the specificities of these structures, as well as the particularities of their functions, recruitment and the status of the staff shall be respected’.
Eftersom den interne tilrettelæggelse af EU‑udenrigstjenesten henhører under Unionens højtstående repræsentant for udenrigsanliggender og sikkerhedspolitiks kompetence, bedes det ærede medlem rette direkte henvendelse til den højtstående repræsentant om dette spørgsmål.
Since the internal organisation of the EEAS comes under the responsibility of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Honourable Member is requested to take up this matter directly with the High Representative.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8362/2010
Question for written answer E-8362/2010
Om: Betingelser for spilleagenters (manageres) udøvelse af erhvervsmæssig forretning inden for europæisk professionel fodbold
Subject: Conditions governing activities of agents in European professional football
I følge artikler fra den europæiske presse overvejer FIFA en fuldstændig liberalisering af erhvervet spilleagent (managere) og ophæver dermed samtlige betingelser for agentlicensen, som indtil videre har været gældende.
According to reports in the European press, FIFA is considering full deregulation of the profession of agent by abolishing all hitherto existing licensing requirements.
Eftersom spilleagenternes rolle hele tiden får en stadig større betydning for europæisk professionel fodbold, og eftersom der inden for de sidste år i mange EU-lande er dukket en stor mængde sager op med økonomisk kriminalitet og korruption, hvor både autoriserede og ikke-autoriserede spilleagenter har været involveret, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende spørgsmål:
Given that the role of agents is becoming ever more significant in European professional football and, at the same time, numerous cases of financial crime and corruption revolving around licensed and unlicensed agents have come to light in recent years in many Member States, will the Commission answer the following questions?
Hvad er Kommissionens holdning til FIFA's planer?
What is its position on FIFA's intention?
Mener den, at det er Kommissionens opgave at foreslå reguleringer inden for denne sektor?
Does it consider that there is scope for regulatory intervention by the Commission in this area?
Hvordan forholder Kommissionen sig til spørgsmålet om spilleagenters indblanding i korruptionssager inden for europæisk professionel fodbold?
What approach does it take to the question of the involvement of agents in corruption cases in European professional football?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8363/2010
Question for written answer E-8363/2010
Om: Det finansielle systems funktion i Grækenland
Subject: Operation of the financial system in Greece
I følge artikler i den internationale presse for nylig blev tilbuddet om opkøb af de under statsligt tilsyn værende banker Agricultural Bank of Greece og Hellenic Postbank mødt af en negativ indstilling fra repræsentanter for trojkaen (ECB, IMF og Kommissionen).
According to press reports, the offer made by a Greek financial group to the Greek Government to buy the Agricultural Bank of Greece and the Hellenic Postbank foundered on a negative recommendation from representatives of the ‘troika’ (ECB, IMF and the Commission).
Hvad er Kommissionens holdning i den foreliggende sag?
What is the Commission's position on this matter?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8365/2010
Question for written answer E-8365/2010
Om: Ren energi, som forurener
Subject: Noxious clean energy
Ifølge en undersøgelse foretaget af Sunday Times påfører mindst halvdelen af den fotoelektromotoriske produktion i verden miljøet alvorlig skade.
According to a Sunday Times report, at least half of the world’s photovoltaic production, as matters now stand, constitutes a serious danger to the environment.
Bag produktionen af solcellepaneler – viser undersøgelsen – gemmer der sig miljøforurenende arbejdsprocesser.
Concealed behind the production of solar panels — so the report maintains — is ongoing environmental pollution.
I Kina, hvor mere end halvdelen af verdens produktion af solcellepaneler foregår, lader de lokale virksomheder til i det nærliggende miljø at have spredt mere end 300.000 t industriaffald ud over det, som selskabets ledelse havde opgivet.
In China, which makes over half of the panels in the world, local firms have apparently dumped more than 300 000 tonnes of industrial waste into the environment, over and above the quantities declared by their management.
Blandt bønderne i et område i nærheden af en virksomhed syd for Shanghai skulle antallet af kræftdødsfald – ifølge det engelske dagblad – være steget i de seneste år.
The Sunday Times claims that deaths from cancer have increased in recent years among the peasants living in the vicinity of a factory south of Shanghai.
I betragtning af at instrumentet ikke må sammenblandes med producenterne, er det ikke produktet i sig selv, der skal fordømmes, men den kinesiske industripolitik, som slet ikke tager hensyn til miljøet.
Given that it is necessary to distinguish between the tool and the producers, what should be condemned here is not the product as such, but Chinese industrial policy, which totally disregards the environment.
Hvis viljen er til stede, er det muligt at producere og bortskaffe solcellepaneler uden forurening.
If people have the will to do it, photovoltaic panels can be produced and disposed of without pollution.
Men det ser ud til, at bortskaffelsen vil være 10 gange mere kompliceret og omkostningskrævende end bortskaffelse af radioaktivt affald.
But the disposal operation will apparently be ten times more complex and costly than the disposal of radioactive waste.
Er det måske af denne grund, at Kina forurener i stedet for at bortskaffe affaldet uden skade på miljøet?
Could that be the reason why China is polluting the environment instead of disposing of the waste without causing damage?
Har Kommissionen taget initiativer over for Kina med henblik på at forhindre eller i det mindste formindske den del af miljøforureningen, som skyldes produktionen af solcellepaneler? 2.
Has the Commission, which is surely aware of this situation, approached China with a view to averting or at least reducing the environmental pollution resulting from the manufacture of photovoltaic panels?
Er Kommissionen stadig overbevist om, at anvendelsen af solceller til produktion af energi – når miljø og forbrugere skal beskyttes – reelt er hensigtsmæssig?
Is it still convinced that photovoltaic energy generation is a sound option from the point of view of environmental and consumer protection?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8366/2010
Question for written answer E-8366/2010
Om: ADHD-centre og forældrenes samtykke
Subject: ADHD centres and family consent
I Italien og i Europa findes der ADHD-centre (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder), der behandler børn med dette syndrom.
There are a number of ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) centres in Italy and other EU Member States, at which children suffering from this syndrome can receive treatment.
Generelt forbyder sundhedsprotokollerne anvendelsen af disse psykoaktive molekyler uden forældrenes informerede samtykke – personalet er forpligtet til med den største klarhed at gøre forældrene bekendt med alle mulige bivirkninger.
As a rule, health protocols prohibit the administration of psychoactive medicines to children without the informed consent of their parents, who must be clearly informed of all the possible side-effects.
Det sker imidlertid af og til, at protokollerne ikke følges med den nødvendige nøjagtighed.
However, the protocols are not always followed as conscientiously as they should be.
Der udleveres en formular – den er måske ikke en gang udfyldt og blandet med mange andre papirer – uden nogen forklaring, uden at beskrive de mulige bivirkninger og uden at præsentere familien for alternative terapeutiske forløb.
Parents are sometimes asked to sign a form (which, in some cases, has not even been filled in) presented to them among a host of others, without being given any explanation and without any mention being made of the possible side-effects or the alternative forms of treatment available.
Denne skødesløshed skal uden tøven fordømmes, ligesom centrene skal underlægges sundhedsmyndigheders strenge kontrol med, om informationspligten overholdes over for forældrene, som skal gøres bekendt med de ikkefarmakologiske behandlinger, der anvendes.
This lack of due care is reprehensible, and ADHD centres need to be closely monitored by national health authorities in order to ensure that the protocols requiring parents to be duly informed, including of the non-pharmacological treatment methods available, are followed.
Kan Kommissionen, selv om sundhedspolitik ikke henhører under EU's kompetencer, oplyse følgende: 1.
Although the EU has no competence for health policy, would the Commission say whether: 1.
I hvilke medlemsstater findes der sundhedsprotokoller, som forpligter ADHD-centrene til at informere forældrene om den eventuelle behandling af deres børn med psykofarmaka samt om de mulige bivirkninger? 2.
in the Member States health protocols require ADHD centres to tell parents whether psychoactive medicines will be used to treat their children and to inform them of the possible side-effects of those medicines, and if so in which? 2.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at sundhedssikkerhed i forbindelse med anvendelse af lægemidler skal være den vigtigste målsætning, særligt når det drejer sig om børn? 3.
it would not agree that patient safety should be a key concern whenever pharmaceutical products are administered, in particular to children? 3.
Indgår kontrollen af lægemidlers sikkerhed samt de tilhørende anvendelsesprocedurer i EMEA's opgaver? 4.
the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is responsible for monitoring the safety of pharmaceutical products and the procedures for their use? 4.
Har dette agentur også inspektionsbeføjelser over for sundhedscentre i medlemsstaterne?
the EMA’s remit extends to inspections of healthcare centres in the Member States?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8372/2010
Question for written answer E-8372/2010
Om: Landbrugernes problemer på Azorerne
Subject: Problems faced by farmers in the Azores
På et nyligt møde med ledelsen for landbrugsforeningen i S. Miguel i den selvstyrende region Azorerne blev jeg underrettet om landbrugernes problemer og bekymringer i denne yderregion.
During a recent meeting with the management of the São Miguel Agricultural Association, in the autonomous region of the Azores, I was told of the problems and concerns facing farmers in this ultra-peripheral region.
Mælkesektoren er som bekendt af stor betydning, og det er den eneste, der er vokset i de seneste to år, men der hersker bekymringer omkring den varslede nedlæggelse af mælkekvoteordningen.
The dairy sector is very important there, and is the only area to have experienced growth in the last two years, but is overshadowed by the worry that milk quotas are about to come to an end.
Derudover findes der andre problemer, både hvad angår omkostninger til transporten mellem øerne og udgifter til driftsmidler eller støtten til markedsføring med videre.
Other problems also exist, to do with the cost of transport among the islands and of factors of production, and market support, among other issues.
Kommissionen bedes derfor besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
Can the Commission provide information on the following: 1.
Er den parat til at støtte opretholdelsen af mælkekvoteordningen og revidere den med henblik på at gøre den mere retfærdig? 2.
Would it be prepared to support the continuation of the milk quota system, including a review to render it more equitable? 2.
Anser den det for muligt at støtte oprettelsen af en kreditlinje med lav rente som støtte til de kooperativer, der sælger driftsmidler til landbruget, i betragtning af nødvendigheden af at støtte de landbrugere, som bor i denne yderregion? 3.
Does it see any possibility of opening a budget heading to support cooperatives marketing agricultural factors of production, bearing in mind the need to support farmers living in this ultra-peripheral region? 3.
Hvilken støtte kan der gives til fremme og markedsføring af produkterne fra Azorerne? 4.
What forms of support can be offered to promote and market Azorean products? 4.
Hvilken støtte kan der stilles til rådighed for at reducere omkostningerne til transport af personer og varer mellem øerne, i betragtning af at den selvstyrende region Azorerne udover at være en yderregion består af ni øer?
What support can be given to reduce the costs of inter-island transport for both people and products, bearing in mind that the autonomous region of the Azores, apart from being an ultra-peripheral region, is made up of nine islands?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8373/2010
Question for written answer E-8373/2010
Om: Anlæg af en containerhavn på Kreta/beskyttelse af sjældne dyr
Subject: Construction of a container port in Crete, and protection of rare animals
Den græske regering forsøger i øjeblikket at skaffe investorer fra udlandet for at sanere statens budgetter.
The Greek Government is making increasing efforts to attract foreign investors, to improve the health of the national budget.
Bl.a. agiterer den i Kina for investeringer på erhvervs- og skibsfartsområdet.
One measure is to seek to persuade China to invest in its economy and shipping.
Ifølge rapporter fra tyske medier planlægger Grækenland f.eks. at opbygge en containerhavn på øen Kreta med støtte fra kinesiske virksomheder.
According to reports in the German media Greece plans, for example, to build a container port on the island of Crete, with assistance from Chinese companies.
Til dette formål skal Komosbugten forsynes med tre til fire km lange moler.
This would involve building three- to four-kilometre-long breakwaters across Komos bay.
Den lavvandede bugt ville desuden skulle udgraves til en dybde på 16 m.
In addition, the shallow bay would have to be dredged out to a depth of 16 metres.
Imidlertid er store områder af Komosbugten beskyttet af EU's naturbeskyttelsesdirektiver.
However, large stretches of Komos bay are protected by EU environmental protection directives.
Derfor er blød turisme og økologisk landbrug de vigtigste indtægtskilder på egnen.
Green tourism and ecological farming are therefore the main sources of income for the area.
Bugten er bl.a. kendt som yngle- eller æglægningsplads for havskildpadden, som er truet af udryddelse.
The bay is well known as a site for sea turtles, which are an endangered species, to lay and hatch their eggs.
Dens leveområde ville blive fuldstændig ødelagt af den nødvendige udgravning til containerhavnen.
The dredging required for the container port would completely destroy their habitat.
Må Komosbugten overhovedet bebygges og forandres på den beskrevne måde, når dette ville føre til en ødelæggelse af leveområderne for havskildpadden, som i forvejen er truet af udryddelse?
Is it at all permissible for Komos bay to be developed and changed in the way described, if this would lead to destroying the habitat of the sea turtle, which is already threatened with extinction?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-8374/2010
Question for written answer E-8374/2010
Om: Lighthouse e.V.-sagen/samarbejde med de tyrkiske myndigheder
Subject: Case of Lighthouse e.V. and cooperation with Turkish authorities