natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Har Kommissionen kendskab til tilfælde af bortførelse af børn inden for EU?
Is the Commission aware of any cases of alleged child abduction within the European Union?
Mener Kommissionen, at den på nogen måde kan bidrage til at sikre, at børn garanteres adgang til begge forældre (begge EU-borgere, men bosiddende i forskellige medlemsstater)?
Does the Commission believe it can assist in any way to ensure a child is guaranteed access to both parents (both EU citizens but residing in different Member States)?
Hvilke aktioner har Kommissionen foretaget?
What action has the Commission taken?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1107/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1107/05
Om: Forsvarsministeriets salg af jord
Subject: Ministry of Defence land sales
Har Kommissionen nogensinde bestilt, bidraget til eller er faldet over forskning der undersøgte, hvor effektivt disse post-forsvarsmidler er blevet givet ud? - dvs. førte de til nogen betydelig genrejsning, rekonstruerede økonomier, indre investeringer, reparation af eller ny infrastruktur, ny beskæftigelse, genbrug af historiske bygninger, social inddragelse osv. ?
Has the Commission ever commissioned research, contributed to or come across any research which examined how effectively these post-defence funds have been spent - i.e. did they lead to substantial regeneration, rebuilt economies, inward investment, repair of or new infrastructure, new employment, reuse of historic buildings, social inclusion etc.?
Vil Kommissionen i givet fald fremkomme med detaljer?
If so, will the Commission provide the details?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1108/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1108/05
Om: Sikkerhedskontrolbesøg under Euratom-traktaten
Subject: Situation regarding Euratom security inspections
Artikel 81 i Euratom-traktaten pålægger Kommissionen at gennemføre kontrolbesøg i de nukleare anlæg i EU.
Article 81 of the Euratom Treaty requires the Commission to inspect nuclear installations in the European Union.
Kan Kommissionen give oplysninger om antallet af inspektioner, der er foretaget i 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 og 2004, og specielt for 2004 præcisere, hvor mange inspektioner der blev foretaget i EU-15 og hvor mange i den ti nye medlemslande?
Will the Commission provide data on the number of inspections carried out in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, giving separate figures, in particular with regard to 2004, for inspections carried out in the 15-Member EU and those in the ten new Member States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1109/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1109/05
Om: Indstilling af jernbanedriften på regionalnet og de tættest trafikerede højhastighedsforbindelser mellem de store byer efter bortfald af finansieringskilder
Subject: Concentration of rail services on urban networks and on the busiest high-speed connections between major cities as a result of the disappearance of sources of funding
Er det Kommissionen bekendt, at indtægterne fra godstransporten med jernbane tidligere bidrog til, at jernbanevirksomhederne kunne tilbyde rimelige takster for de i driftsøkonomisk henseende tabsgivende passagertjenester, men at denne uundværlige kompensationsmulighed bortfalder, når godstransporten med jernbane nedskæres, eller når godstransporten overgår til en anden virksomhed end den virksomhed, der i samme område udfører personbefordring?
Is the Commission aware that, in the past, railway undertakings used some of the profit that they made on freight transport to subsidise the provision, at reasonable rates, of passenger services which, from a business economics point of view, were loss-making operations but that this essential transfer of funds is disappearing as rail freight transport declines or is taken over by a company other than the company which operates passenger services in the same region?
Erkender Kommissionen risikoen for, at personbefordringen med jernbane i stadig højere grad vil blive begrænset til regionalnet med mange pendlere og til de tættest trafikerede højhastighedsforbindelser mellem store byområder, hvorved de mindre grænseoverskridende forbindelser og betjeningen af tyndt befolkede regioner helt eller for en stor dels vedkommende vil forsvinde?
Does the Commission acknowledge the possibility that passenger transport by rail will be concentrated more and more on heavily used urban commuter networks and on the busiest high‑speed connections between major conurbations, with the minor cross-border services and the provision of services in less densely populated areas totally or largely disappearing?
Hænger det efter Kommissionens opfattelse sammen med de europæiske integrationsbestræbelser, at direkte jernbaneforbindelser mellem byer på begge sider langs en grænse forsvinder, og at det derfor kan blive nødvendigt først at tage et tog, der kun kører til grænseområdet, dernæst passere grænsen med bus, taxi eller til fods og herefter stige ind i et nyt tog, som kører fra den anden side af grænsen?
In the European Commission's opinion, does the disappearance of direct rail connections between cities on either side of a border fit in with the efforts being made to achieve European integration, with passengers being initially forced to travel to the border area by local stopping train, then to cross the border by bus or taxi or on foot before, finally, boarding another local stopping train on the other side of the border?
Accepterer Kommissionen, at stadig mere jernbanetrafik bliver fortrængt af biler og fly, eller forbereder den foranstaltninger, som kan vende den udvikling, at det europæiske jernbanenet bliver opdelt i små regionale enheder og de øvrige forbindelser i stigende omfang indstillet?
Does the Commission accept that rail traffic is being reduced because more people are travelling by car or by air, or is it drawing up measures aimed at reversing the process whereby the European rail network is being cut up into small urban units and the other connections closed down?
Hvilke foranstaltninger er der i bekræftende fald tale om?
If so, what are those measures?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1110/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1110/05
I medierne er det blevet meddelt, at formanden for MPLA's parlamentariske gruppe (det dominerende parti i Angola), Bornito de Sousa, den 3. marts udtrykte tvivl, hvad angår mulighederne for at afholde den internationale donorkonference, som den angolanske regering har anmodet om med henblik på finansiering af genopbygningen af landet. »Personligt tvivler jeg på, om det vil være muligt at afholde donorkonferencen for Angola«, udtalte Bornito de Sousa til journalisterne på Angolas katolske universitet, hvor han deltog i Pro Pace-bevægelsens anden kongres.
According to media reports Bornito de Sousa, parliamentary leader of the MPLA (the dominant party in Angola) expressed doubts, on 3 March, as to whether it would be possible to hold the international donors’ conference that the government had requested in order to fund the reconstruction of the country.
Ifølge medierne hidrører den tvivl, som den parlamentariske leder af Angolas største parti har givet udtryk for, fra det faktum, at afholdelsen af denne konference er betinget af forskellige krav fra det internationale samfunds side, navnlig hvad angår gennemsigtigheden af de indtægter, der stammer fra olieudvinding.
‘Personally, I doubt whether the donors’ conference for Angola can be held’, he told journalists at the Catholic University of Angola, where he was taking part in the second congress of the Pro Pace Movement.
Europa-Parlamentet har allerede i forbindelse med stabilisering og demokratisering af Angola klart tilkendegivet, at det gik ind for afholdelsen af donorkonferencen for Angola.
Also according to the media, the doubts expressed by the parliamentary leader of the main party in Angola stem from the fact that the holding of the conference is subject to a number of demands made by the international community, in particular as regards the degree of transparency of the revenue from petroleum.
Dette fremgår af beslutningerne vedtaget i Strasbourg den 11. april 2002 ( P5_TA(2002)0192 , punkt 11) og den 4. juli 2002 ( P5_TA(2002)0375 , punkt 8).
In the recent context of stabilisation and democratisation in Angola, the European Parliament stated that it was in favour of a donors’ conference for Angola – in the resolutions adopted in Strasbourg on 11 April 2002 ( P5_TA(2002)0192 , paragraph 11) and on 4 July 2002 ( P5_TA(2002)0375 , paragraph 8).
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1111/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1111/05
Om: Harmonisering af toksikologiske data
Subject: Harmonisation of toxicological data
Inden for disse rammer blev der indledt overvejelser om et forslag, der skal føre til en ny lovgivningsramme for kemiske produkter i EU, nemlig REACH (registrering, vurdering og godkendelse af kemiske produkter).
It was against this background that discussions began on a proposal for a new regulatory framework for chemicals within the European Union called REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of CHemicals).
Ud over dette forslag omtalte hvidbogen også en mulig harmonisering af toksikologiske data såvel på EU-plan som internationalt?
In addition to this proposal, the White Paper referred to the possible harmonisation of toxicological data at both Community and international levels.
Hvordan går det med dette forslag?
What is the current situation regarding this proposal?
Hvor langt er Kommissionen kommet med arbejdet på dette område?
What stage has the Commission reached in its work in this area?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1112/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1112/05
Om: De central- og østeuropæiske landes indtræden i Schengen-området
Subject: Central and Eastern European countries joining the Schengen Area
Ifølge forlydender i pressen (Gazeta Wyborcza af 26. januar 2005) vil de central- og østeuropæiske stater, der tiltrådte EU den 1. maj 2004, indtræde i Schengen-området den 28. oktober 2007.
According to recent press reports (in Gazeta Wyborcza on 26 January 2005), the Central and Eastern European states which acceded on 1 May 2004 will be joining the Schengen area on 28 October 2007.
Er dette korrekt?
Is that report correct?
Hvornår anser Rådet i benægtende fald en udvidelse af Schengen-samarbejdet til også at omfatte de senest tiltrådte stater for hensigtsmæssigt?
If not, by when does the Council think it appropriate to extend the Schengen system to include the states which have acceded?
Om dette forlydende er korrekt afhænger af, a) om alle kravene med hensyn til anvendelse af Schengen-reglerne fuldt ud vil være opfyldt af disse medlemsstater, og b) om Schengen-informationssystemet (SIS II) er blevet operationelt i 2007.
The correctness of that report depends on a) whether all requirements for application of the Schengen acquis will have been fulfilled by those Member States and b) the Schengen Information System (SIS II) having become operational in 2007.
Det Europæiske Råd anmodede den 5. november 2004 indtrængende Rådet, Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne om at træffe alle nødvendige foranstaltninger til afskaffelse af kontrollen ved de indre grænser snarest muligt, forudsat at alle krav vedrørende anvendelsen af Schengen-reglerne er opfyldt, og efter at Schengen-informationssystemet (SIS II) er blevet operationelt i 2007.
The European Council of 5 November 2004 urged ‘the Council, the Commission and Member States to take all necessary measures to allow the abolition of controls at internal borders as soon as possible , provided all requirements to apply the Schengen acquis have been fulfilled and after the Schengen Information System (SIS II) has become operational in 2007.
For at nå dette mål bør evalueringen af gennemførelsen af de regler, der ikke vedrører SIS II, indledes i første halvår af 2006.
In order to reach this goal, the evaluation of the implementation of the non SIS II related acquis should start in the first half of 2006.’
To forhold, som berører tidsrammen for evalueringen, er medlemsstaternes erklæringer om, at de er klar til de evalueringer, der ikke vedrører SIS II (næsten alle disse erklæringer er modtaget), og at det centrale SIS II-system bliver operationelt inden marts 2007.
Two elements affecting the time-frame of the evaluation exercise, are Member States' declarations of readiness for non‑SIS related evaluations (almost all of which have been received) and the SIS II central system becoming operational by March 2007.
Da ændringerne i flyplanerne finder sted enten den 25. marts eller den 28. oktober 2007, er en større omdirigering af fly i lufthavnene først rimelig på disse tidspunkter, hvorved mulighederne for den faktiske tilslutning begrænses.
Since the changes in air-traffic timetables take place either on 25 March or 28 October 2007, any large re-routing of airplanes at airports is reasonable only on those dates, thereby limiting the possibilities for actual joining.
Processen med evaluering, rapportering og beslutningstagning finder sted mellem Rådet og hver enkelt medlemsstat individuelt.
The process of evaluating, reporting and decision-making will take place between the Council and each Member State individually.
Alle medlemsstaterne deltager i drøftelserne, men den endelige afgørelse træffes af både de medlemsstater, der i øjeblikket anvender de relevante Schengen-regler, og den pågældende nye medlemsstat.
All Member States participate in the deliberations, but the final decision is taken by both the Member States currently applying the relevant Schengen acquis and the new Member State concerned.
En eventuel afgørelse om at afskaffe de indre grænser vil blive truffet af Rådet i overensstemmelse med artikel 3, stk. 2, i tiltrædelsesakten fra 2003.
The eventual decision on lifting the internal borders will be taken by the Council in accordance with Article 3 paragraph 2 of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Denne rådsafgørelse kræver enstemmighed fra de medlemsstaters side, der på tidspunktet for vedtagelsen af afgørelsen gennemfører de relevante dele af Schengen-reglerne fuldt ud, og af den evaluerede medlemsstat.
This Council decision requires unanimity of the Member States which, at the time of the adoption of the decision, implement the relevant parts of the Schengen acquis in full and of the Member State under evaluation.
Hvis Rådet ikke er i stand til at give en positiv vurdering af evalueringen af en ny medlemsstat, skal de(n) øvrige medlemsstat(er) være parat til at opretholde eller indføre grænsekontrol i overensstem­melse med Schengen-reglerne i deres forbindelser med den stat, der fortsat står uden for Schengen-området.
In the hypothetical situation that the Council is not in a position to positively assess the evaluation of a new Member State, the other Member State(s) should be in a position to maintain or establish border controls in accordance with the Schengen acquis in their relations with the Member State remaining outside of the Schengen area.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1113/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1113/05
af Richard Howitt (PSE)
by Richard Howitt (PSE)
Om: Handicappede i forbindelse med udbringning af nødhjælp
Subject: Disability in emergency relief delivery
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at ECHO er i færd med at lave en evalueringsrapport om handicappedes rolle i forbindelse med udbringning af nødhjælp?
Can the Commission confirm that ECHO is undertaking an evaluation report on disability in emergency relief delivery?
Hvornår forventes rapporten at være færdig, og hvilke planer har Kommissionen om spredning af resultatet, herunder til de handicappedes organisationer og til Europa-Parlamentet selv?
When is the report expected to be completed, and what plans does the Commission have to disseminate the results, including to disabled people's organisations and to the European Parliament itself?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1116/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1116/05
Om: Nødkaldsnummer i de nye medlemsstater
Subject: Emergency call number in the new Member States
Nødkaldsnummeret er er livsvigtigt for alle EU-borgere.
An emergency call number is essential to every EU citizen.
Hvordan stiller Kommissionen sig til dette spørgsmål?
What is the Commission's position on this?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1117/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1117/05
Om: Adgang for journalister
Subject: Access to journalists
Den maltesiske regering giver ikke maltesiske, europæiske og internationale journalister, som ønsker at besøge interneringscentre for illegale indvandrere, adgang (end ikke begrænset adgang) til disse centre.
The Maltese Government is not granting access (not even of a restricted nature) to Maltese, European and international journalists who want to visit the detention centres where illegal immigrants are held.
Er Rådet klar over den maltesiske regerings optræden på dette punkt?
Is the Council aware of the Maltese Government’s conduct?
Et hundrede journalister har undertegnet et andragende, hvori de anmoder om at få adgang til interneringscentrene.
100 journalists have signed a petition asking for such access to be granted.
Mener Rådet, at det i et europæisk land bør være sådan, at medierne har ret til at besøge sådanne centre?
Does the Council believe that, in a European country, the media should have the right to visit such centres?
Adgang til interneringscentre i en medlemsstat er en sag for den pågældende medlemsstat og ikke for Rådet, som ikke har nogen kompetence på området.
The access to detention centres in a Member State is a matter for that Member State and not for the Council, which does not have any competence in the question.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1118/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1118/05
Er Kommissionen klar over den maltesiske regerings optræden på dette punkt?
Is the Commission aware of the Maltese Government’s conduct?
Mener Kommissionen, at det i et europæisk land bør være sådan, at medierne har ret til at besøge sådanne centre?
Does the Commission believe that, in a European country, the media should have the right to visit such centres?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1119/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1119/05
Om: Udvikling af Europaskolesystemet
Subject: Future of the European Schools
Situationen for Europaskolerne med lukningen af flere sprogafdelinger og den uforholdsmæssige forhøjelse af skolepengene gør det nødvendigt at tage fat på spørgsmålet om, hvilke reformer ordningen skal undergå.
The situation of the European Schools, with the closure of certain language sections and the disproportionate increase in the fees (‘minerval’), is such that proposals are needed to reform the system.
Europa-Parlamentet udtalte sig i 2002 med betækningen af Bösch, og Kommissionen har reageret med meddelelsen om samråd om Europaskolesystemets fremtidige udvikling.
Parliament expressed its position in 2002 with the Bösch report, and the Commission reacted with a communication on consultations regarding the future shape of the system.
Mens vi afventer afslutningen af de igangværende procedurer, finder jeg det på sin plads at fastslå, at Europaskolerne har varetaget og varetager en vigtig didaktisk og kulturel opgave med at skabe en civil europæisk bevidsthed hos de kommende generationer.
Pending the conclusions of the procedures under way, it appears desirable to reaffirm the view that the European Schools have developed, and continue to develop, an important educational and cultural role with regard to the creation of a European citizenship mentality within the younger generations.
Deler Kommissionen denne opfattelse?
Does the Commission share these views?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at det er nyttigt og hensigtsmæssigt at inddrage medlemsstaternes regeringer i udviklingen af systemet både for at sikre de eksisterende sprogafdelingers funktion og for at åbne disse afdelinger for elever, der vil blive betragtet som henhørende under kategori III?
Does the Commission not believe that it would be desirable to involve the governments of the Member States in the discussions on the future of the system, with a view to ensuring the continuation of the existing language sections and to opening the schools up so as to admit ‘category III’ pupils?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at en udvikling af skolerne i retning af en offentlig europæisk tjeneste, der er så åben som muligt, vil kunne bidrage til at skabe en civil europæisk bevidsthed hos de kommende generationer?
Does the Commission not believe that the conversion of the schools into a European public service, of as open a nature as possible, could contribute to the creation of a European citizenship mentality within the new generations?
Finder Kommissionen ikke, at det i forbindelse med de bebudede samråd vil være hensigtsmæssigt allerede nu at rejse problemet med de forslag, der skal lægges ud til forhandling mellem de 25 medlemsstater, for at sikre en tættere inddragelse af medlemsstaterne?
Does the Commission not believe that, in the context of the proposed consultations, it is already necessary to raise the issue of the proposals to be presented for negotiation by the 25, with a view to more closely involving the Member States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1120/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1120/05
Om: Afskaffelse af »statsskadelige« dyrenavne i Tyrkiet
Subject: Abolition of ‘subversive’ animal names in Turkey
Ifølge »Turkish Daily News« den 7. marts bebudede den tyrkiske minister for miljø og skovbrug, at dyrebetegnelser, hvori ordene »Kurdistan« og »Armenien« (og afledninger heraf) forekommer, vil blive ændret.
According to an article published in the 7 March 2005 edition of the Turkish Daily News, the Turkish Ministry of Environment and Forestry has announced that animal names that include the words ‘Kurdistan’ and ‘Armenia’ (or derivatives therefrom) have been changed.
Ifølge den tyrkiske avis forklarede ministeriet, at de oprindelige betegnelser bevidst var valgt for at udgøre en trussel mod den tyrkiske enhedsstat.
According to the newspaper report, the Turkish Ministry declared that the original names had been deliberately selected in order to constitute a threat to the unitary state.
Ændringerne skulle derfor ses i sammenhæng med de tyrkiske myndigheders indsats mod »separatisme«.
Accordingly, the name changes form part of the Turkish Government's campaign against ‘separatism’.
Desuden skal nye betegnelser være anført i relevant litteratur, før de kan officielt kan vinde indpas.
Furthermore, any new designations had to be cited in the relevant literature before they could be deemed to be official.
Hvad er Kommissionens holdning?
What is the Commission's attitude to this?
Finder Kommissionen, at denne foranstaltning er i overensstemmelse med ånd og bogstav i forpligtelsen til at respektere minoritetsgrupper som beskrevet i København-kriterierne?
Does the Commission consider that this measure is in conformity with the letter and spirit of the obligation to respect the rights of minorities laid down in the Copenhagen Criteria?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1121/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1121/05
Om: Premierminister Erdogans reaktion på politivold mod kvindedemonstration i Tyrkiet
Subject: Police violence against a women's demonstration in Turkey - Prime Minister Erdoğan's reaction
Ifølge »Turkish Daily News« den 11. marts udsendte den tyrkiske premierminister Recep Tayyip Erdogan en erklæring om den brutale politivold mod kvindedemonstrationen i Istanbul den 6. marts i anledning af den internationale kvindedag.
According to the Turkish Daily News on 11 March 2005, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan made a statement on police brutality against the women’s demonstration in Istanbul, on 6 March 2005, in connection with International Women's Day.
Premierministeren anførte, at de tyrkiske medier havde givet episoden »overdreven« opmærksomhed.
Mr Erdoğan stated that the Turkish media had given the incident an ‘exaggerated’ degree of attention.
Ifølge »Turkish Daily News« hævdede Erdogan også, at de demonstrerende kvinder »havde provokeret politiet for at forpurre et møde mellem Tyrkiet og EU den følgende dag«.
According to the Turkish Daily News, Mr Erdoğan also claimed that the women demonstrators had been provoking the police in order to cast a shadow over the following day's Turkey-EU meeting.
I modsætning til den opmærksomhed, medierne tillagde hændelsen, betragter Erdogan åbenbart ikke den brutale politivold som noget større problem
Police brutality is evidently in itself no great problem for Mr Erdoğan (in contrast with the media attention it has been given).
Finder Rådet, at Erdogans erklæringer er tilfredsstillende?
Does the Council regard Mr Erdoğan's statements as satisfactory?