natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
De administrative udgifter vil derfor indgå i budgetterne for de fire udgiftsområder, der skal anvendes i fremtiden.
Accordingly, this administrative expenditure will be included in the budgets for the four headings which are to be used in future.
Hvor stort et beløb forventer Kommissionen, at Unionen i alt vil afsætte til administrative udgifter?
How many euros does the Commission expect the Union, in total, to devote to administrative expenditure?
Sikrer forslaget i sin nuværende form den fornødne gennemsigtighed?
In their present form, do the plans provide for the requisite transparency?
Vil de foreslåede administrative bevillinger være tilstrækkelige til at sikre en proportionel repræsentation af medlemsstaterne i Unionens administrative system?
Will the proposed administrative appropriations be sufficient to ensure the proportionate representation of the Member States in the Union's administrative apparatus?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3483/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3483/04
Om: Spredning af HIV-virus i Østeuropa
Subject: Spread of the HIV virus in Eastern Europe
En frisk rapport fra organisationen Unaids konstateres det, at der er sket en voldsom spredning af HIV-virus i Østeuropa i løbet af ganske få år.
A recent report by the organisation UNAIDS points to a huge spread in the HIV virus in Eastern Europe within the space of just a few years.
I Østeuropa og Centralasien skal 1,4 mio. mennesker være smittet med HIV-virus.
In Eastern Europe and Central Asia some 1.4 million people are believed to be infected with the HIV virus.
Navnlig Rusland (omkring 1 mio. mennesker) og Ukraine er hårdt ramt.
The virus is particularly affecting Russia (almost one million people) and the Ukraine.
Også i nye medlemsstater, som f.eks. de baltiske lande, er der sket en klar stigning i antallet af smittede.
A clear increase is also being seen in the number of those affected in new EU Member States as well as in the Baltic countries.
Kommissionen konstaterer (med rette), at denne spredning udgør en fare for hele Europa, og at der derfor er behov for handling på europæisk plan (»Gefahr ohne Grenzen«, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 24. november 2004).
The European Commission has (rightly) stated that the spread of the virus poses a danger for the whole of Europe and that a common European response is therefore needed (‘Gefahr ohne Grenzen’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 24 November 2004).
I en rapport fra Den Forenede Nationers udviklingsprogram konstateres det, at spredningen af HIV hænger nøje sammen med narkotikamisbruget.
A report by the United Nations Development Programme comments that the spread of HIV is closely linked to drug use.
Ifølge denne rapport er såkaldte »harm reduction« -aktiviteter - begrænsning af skaderne som følge af narkotikamisbrug - en væsentlig del af kampen mod HIV.
According to the report, so-called harm reduction activities - limiting the harm related to drug use - are an essential aspect of the fight against HIV.
Dette omfatter f.eks. udskiftning af sprøjter, metadonterapi, undervisning og forbedret adgang til sundhedsvæsenet (United Nations Development Programme, Reversing the epidemic.
These include needle exchanges, methadone treatment, education and improved access to medical services (United Nations Development Programme, Reversing the epidemic.
Facts and policy options, 17. februar 2004, s. 67).
Facts and policy options, 17 February 2004, p.
Ifølge Martin Barnes er spredningen af denne virus meget farlig for den tilgrænsende Europæiske Union.
According to Mr Barnes, the spread of the virus represents a serious risk for the neighbouring European Union.
Han konstaterer, at den udelukkende repressive indfaldsvinkel til narkotikaproblemet i Rusland kun virker negativt og foreslår, at EU opfordrer Rusland til at indlede »harm reduction«-programmer (»Leading UK drugs charity voices concern over HIV in Russia and the Ukraine«, DrugScope, 17. februar 2004: se http://www.drugscope.org.uk).
He comments that the solely punitive approach to the drug problem adopted in Russia has a very negative effect, and asks the EU to urge Russia to introduce harm reduction programmes (‘Leading UK drugs charity voices concern over HIV in Russia and the Ukraine’, DrugScope, 17 February 2004: see http://www.drugscope.org.uk).
Har EU en specifik strategi over for Rusland på dette område?
Does the EU have a specific strategy in relation to Russia in this area?
Kan Kommissionen i bekræftende fald give en kort oversigt over den?
If so, could the Commission briefly outline this?
Hvad mener Kommissionen om den russiske politik i dette spørgsmål?
What is the Commission's view of Russian policy in this area?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3484/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3484/04
Om: Syntetisk narkotika i Den Europæiske Union
Subject: Synthetic drugs in the European Union
Den 24. november 2004 forelagde Marcel Reimen og Georges Estievenart fra Det Europæiske Overvågningscenter for Narkotika og Narkotikamisbrug (EMCDDA) dette agenturs årsberetning for 2004.
Op 24 November 2004 Mr Marcel Reimen and Mr Georges Estievenart of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) presented the agency's 2004 annual report.
Ifølge EMCDDA har narkotikamisbruget aldrig været så højt.
According to the EMCDDA drug use is higher than ever before.
Agenturet konstaterede, at syntetisk narkotika vinder stigende udbredelse (navnlig XTC foruden amfetamin og LSD) (De Tijd, 26. november 2004; De Standaard, 26. november 2004).
The agency noted a rise in the use of synthetic drugs, particularly ecstasy, amphetamines and LSD (De Tijd, 26 November 2004; De Standaard, 26 November 2004).
Under det danske EU-formandskab i 2002 advarede den danske justitsminister Lene Espersen om udbredelsen af syntetisk narkotika, og hun foreslog en række foranstaltninger som f.eks. en fælles database over bestemte produkter, der anvendes til illegal fremstilling af syntetisk narkotika, en fælles analyse af visse beslaglæggelser af syntetisk narkotika, indsamling og koordinering af oplysninger ikke kun om illegale stoffer, men også om kemikere, som mistænkes for at være involveret i denne fremstilling.
During the Danish Presidency of the EU in 2002, the Danish Justice Minister Lene Espersen warned about the rise in the use of synthetic drugs and proposed a number of measures, including a common database on precursors used in the illicit production of synthetic drugs, joint analysis of certain seizures of synthetic drugs, and collection and coordination of intelligence not only on illegal substances but also on chemists suspected of being involved in the illicit manufacture of synthetic drugs.
Desuden foreslog Lene Espersen, at kriminelle organisationer i hvert enkelt land blev identificeret (»European action against drugs«, 14. september 2002, kan ses på http://www.eu2002.dk).
Mrs Espersen also proposed that the involvement of organised crime groups be determined country by country (‘European action against drugs’, 14 September 2002: see http://www.eu2002.dk).
Hvilke foranstaltninger er der i denne sammenhæng allerede truffet i europæisk regi?
What measures have already been taken in this connection at the European level?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen foreslå i den nærmeste fremtid og senere med henblik på bekæmpelsen af syntetisk narkotika?
What measures does the Commission propose to take in the near and more distant future in the fight against synthetic drugs?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3485/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3485/04
(5. januar 2005)
(5 January 2005)
Om: Generalsekretær og højtstående repræsentant for FUSP Javier Solana og dennes formodede forbindelser til den forbudte organisation Hamas
Subject: Secretary-General and CFSP High Representaive Javier Solana and his alleged contacts with the proscribed organisation Hamas
Vil Rådets generalsekretær give et overblik over de regeringer og andre parter på området, der har formidlet sonderingsarbejde og indtryk mellem EU's højtstående repræsentant og Hamas, med angivelse for hvert tilfælde af, om de handlede på specifik anmodning fra a) den højtstående repræsentant eller b) dennes tjenestemænd, og under hvilken myndighed disse anmodninger blev fremført?
Will the Secretary-General of the Council list the governments and other parties on the ground which conveyed soundings and impressions between the EU High Representative and Hamas, stating in each case whether they had acted at the specific request of (a) the High Representative and (b) his officials, and under what authority these requests were made?
Vil han yderligere angive, om forbindelser eller sonderingsarbejde og indtryk formidlet mellem den højtstående repræsentant og organisationer, der optræder på EU's liste over terrororganisationer, blev drøftet på Rådets (Generelle Anliggender og Eksterne Relationer) møde den 22. og 23. november 2004, hvor fredsprocessen i Mellemøsten blev drøftet?
Will he also state whether either contacts or soundings and impressions conveyed between the High Representative and organisations on the EU list of terrorist organisations were discussed at the General Affairs and External Relations Council meeting held on 22 and 23 of November, at which the Middle East Peace Process was discussed?
Generalsekretæren/den højtstående repræsentant for Den Europæiske Union har som svar på det ærede parlamentsmedlems forespørgsel intet at føje til de oplysninger, som hans talsmand fremkom med om dette spørgsmål den 25. november 2004.
In reply to the Honourable Member of the European Parliament, the Secretary-General of the Council/High Representative of the European Union has nothing to add to the announcement made by his spokesperson on this subject on 25 November 2004.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3486/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3486/04
Om: Tillæg for enkeltrejsende
Subject: Supplements for single travellers
Er Kommissionen klar over, at britiske rejsearrangører sædvanligvis afkræver enkeltrejsende tillæg, til tider op til 70 EUR pr. nat?
Is the Commission aware that UK tour operators usually charge supplements, sometimes as high as 70 euros a night, for single travellers?
Kan Kommissionen redegøre for, om dette er standardpraksis i Europa?
Can the Commission clarify whether this is a standard practice across Europe?
Mener Kommissionen, at denne praksis er diskriminerende mod borgere, der ikke deler værelse?
Does the Commission consider that this practice discriminates against citizens who do not share accommodation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3487/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3487/04
Om: Rådets fælles holdning om Burma
Subject: Council Common Position on Burma
Gør Burmas militærregimes forbud for fremmede selskaber mod at investere i burmesiske statsejede virksomheder de nye EU-sanktioner fuldstændig ineffektive? 2.
Does the fact that Burma's military regime banned foreign companies from investing in Burmese state-owned enterprises make the new EU sanctions totally ineffective? 2.
Hvorfor er burmesiske statsejede virksomheder som f.eks. MOGE ikke omfattet af EU-sanktionerne mod Burma, når 100% privatejede selskaber som f.eks. Myanmar Economic Corporation er?
Why have Burmese state-owned enterprises such as MOGE not been included in the EU sanctions on Burma, while 100% privately owned companies such as Myanmar Economic Corporation have?
Er dette lovligt i betragtning af, at den fælles holdning specifikt er rettet mod de statsejede og ikke de privatejede virksomheder? 3.
Is this legal, given that the Common Position specifically authorises the targeting of state-owned enterprises, not privately-owned ones? 3.
Hvilke specifikke joint ventures mellem EU og Burma er berørt af de nye EU-sanktioner?
Which specific EU-Burmese joint ventures have been affected by the new EU sanctions?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3488/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3488/04
Om: Miljøkriminalitet begået af affaldsforarbejdningsvirksomheder og overskridelse af luftkvalitetsnormer i Nederlandene og forbindelserne til EU-retten på miljøområdet
Subject: Crimes against the environment committed by waste processing companies and violation of air quality standards in the Netherlands and the relationship to the EU acquis in the area of the environment
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at det i en rapport fra det nationale politikorps (Korps Landelijke Politiediensten, KLPD) og det nederlandske ministerium for boligspørgsmål, fysisk planlægning og miljø konstateres, at politiet og myndighederne gør meget lidt for at bekæmpe svær miljøkriminalitet, navnlig kriminalitet på affaldsforarbejdningsvirksomheder, som f.eks. illegal bortkørsel af affald, illegal eksport af affald, manglende overholdelse af godkendelseskrav, handel med farlige stoffer, ulovlig deponering af folie til landbruget, affaldsslagger, slam, asbest og hormoner eller blanding af disse med stoffer, der er beregnet til andre formål.
Is the Commission aware that a report by the National Police Agency (KLPD) and the Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment in the Netherlands states that the police and the authorities are doing little to combat serious crimes against the environment, in particular crimes committed by waste processing companies, such as the illegal transport of waste, the illegal export of waste, evading the obligation to hold licences, trade in dangerous substances and the illegal dumping, or the mixing with substances intended for a different purpose, of agricultural plastic foil, waste slag, sewage sludge, asbestos and hormones?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at denne form for kriminalitet, hvormed der kan opnås enorm fortjeneste samtidig med, at andre virksomheder eller samfundet som helhed påføres stor skade, ikke kontrolleres og bekæmpes i tilstrækkelig grad, fordi der i det nederlandske politi er utilstrækkelig kapacitet til langvarig beskæftigelse af de specialister, der er påkrævet, idet bekæmpelse af andre former for kriminalitet kræver alle ressourcer, eller fordi man ikke vil påføre de virksomheder, der foretager forureningen, økonomisk skade?
Is the Commission aware that these kinds of crime, which generate enormous profits whilst inflicting a great deal of damage on other companies and on society as a whole, are inadequately controlled and fought against, because the Netherlands police force has insufficient capacity to deploy on a long-term basis the specialists necessary to that end, in so far as the fight against other forms of crime demands all of its attention, or because of a desire not to harm the economic interests of companies involved in polluting the environment?
I hvilken udstrækning hersker tilsvarende situationer i andre EU-medlemsstater?
To what extent do similar situations occur in other EU Member States?
I hvilke »gamle« (inden 1. maj 2004) medlemsstater forekom dette henholdsvis mest og mindst i henhold til Kommissionens oplysninger?
Where, in the ‘old’ (pre-1 May 2004) EU Member States, does this occur the most and where does it least occur, according to Commission statistics?
Hvordan kan disse forskelle forklares?
What accounts for these differences?
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at koncentrationen af nitrogendioxid (NO2) og små partikler i den meget tæt befolkede vestlige del af Nederlandene i byer og langs motorvejene er meget høj og overskrider WHO-grænseværdien på 40 mikrogram NO2 pr m3 luft, hvilket kan medføre, at ældre mennesker dør for tidligt?
Is the Commission aware that in the very heavily populated west of the Netherlands, in cities and along motorways, the concentration of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and fine particles is very high and the WHO maximum of 40 micrograms NO2 per m3 of air is exceeded, which can lead to premature death among older people?
Opfylder Nederlandene efter Kommissionens mening stadig EU-normerne på miljøområdet?
In the Commission's view, is the Netherlands still complying with EU standards in the area of the environment?
Kan Nederlandene med den nuværende tendens opfylde normerne for små partikler i 2010?
Based on the current trend, will the Netherlands be able to comply with standards for fine particles in 2010?
Sikrer Kommissionen, ar overholdelsen af normerne systematisk kontrolleres, og hvad er resultaterne af sådanne kontroller?
Is compliance with the rules systematically checked on behalf of the Commission, and what are the findings of such checks?
Medfører dette idømmelse af bøder eller gennemførelse af andre sanktioner?
Does this lead to fines or other sanctions being imposed?
Hvilke ændringer bør Nederlandene efter Kommissionens opfattelse fremover foretage med henblik på at overholde miljønormerne?
In the Commission's view, what changes need to be made in future in the Netherlands with regard to compliance with environmental standards?
Hvorledes bidrager Kommissionen til at fremme sådanne ændringer?
What is the Commission doing to encourage such change?
Kilde: »Rotterdams Dagblad« af 4. december 2004.
Source: ‘Rotterdams Dagblad’, 4 December 2004
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3490/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3490/04
Om: Sport i EU
Subject: Sport in the EU
Det Europæiske År for Uddannelse gennem Idræt er ved at være forbi.
The European Year of Education through Sport is now coming to an end.
Kommissionen bedes forelægge sin vurdering heraf.
Will the Commission give its assessment of what has been achieved?
Den seneste offentliggjorte opinionsundersøgelse foretaget af Eurobarometer viser bl.a., at kun 62% af de udspurgte finder det nødvendigt, at der henvises til sport i forfatningstraktaten, medens 80% mener, at det kun forventes, at EU intervenerer hovedsageligt i forbindelse med bekæmpelse af doping.
The recent publication of a public opinion poll by Eurobarometer shows, inter alia, that a mere 62% of those questioned believe that sport should be referred to in the Constitutional Treaty, while 80% take the view that the EU is expected to intervene mainly in order to combat doping.
Er Kommissionen tilfreds med resultaterne af denne opinionsundersøgelse?
Is the Commission satisfied with the findings of this public opinion poll?
Hvorledes agter Kommissionen at udnytte de muligheder, som forfatningstraktaten giver efter dens ratificering, med henblik på iværksættelse af en fællesskabspolitik inden for sport?
How does it intend to realise the potential provided by the Constitutional Treaty, once it is ratified, to institute a Community sports policy?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3491/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3491/04
Om: Regulering af Lloyd's
Subject: Regulation of Lloyd's
Domstolene har fastslået (i sagen »Thomas J in Sphere Drake v EIU and SCB«), at flere syndikater hos Lloyd's har indgået uautoriserede forretningsaftaler, der ikke drejede sig om forsikring, men om handel med bruttotab, og at de således tydeligvis ikke har overholdt kravene i direktiv 73/239/EØF EFT L 228 af 16.8.1973, s. 3 . .
In view of the fact that the Courts (Thomas J in Sphere Drake v EIU and SCB) have identified that Syndicates at Lloyd’s wrote unauthorised business that was not insurance but was a trade in gross losses, and therefore clearly the requirements of Directive 73/239/EEC OJ L 228, 16.8.1973, p.
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet for at sikre, at der findes procedurer til at forhindre, at der indgås uautoriserede forretningsaftaler hos Lloyd's igen?
3 . were not being properly applied, what steps have been taken by the Commission to ensure that procedures are in place to make it impossible for unauthorised business to be done at Lloyd’s again?
Selv om de uautoriserede forretningsaftaler, der blev indgået hos Lloyd's (jf. afgørelsen i sagen »Thomas J in Sphere Drake v EIU and SCB« fra juli 2003), drejede sig om bedrageri, passerede hver eneste police gennem Lloyd's Policy Signing Office og Lloyd's Claims Office.
Although the unauthorised business done at Lloyd’s (decision of Thomas J in Sphere Drake v EIU and SCB July 2003) was the product of fraud, every policy involved went through the Lloyd’s Policy Signing Office and the Lloyd’s Claims Office.
De blev alle godkendt hos Lloyd's Central Fund.
They were all backed by the Lloyd’s Central Fund.
Der er helt klart sket en række overtrædelser af direktivets krav.
A number of breaches of Directive requirements set out in Directive 73/239 were evident.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvilke foranstaltninger der er truffet for at sikre, at sådanne uautoriserede forretningsaftaler bliver opdaget ved kontrollen hos Lloyd's Policy Signing Office?
Can the Commission say what steps have been taken to ensure that such unauthorised business is picked up on review by the Lloyd’s Policy Signing Office?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3493/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3493/04
Om: Dyr anvendt til videnskabelige formål
Subject: Animals used for experimental purposes
Mener Kommissionen, at dette direktiv anvendes korrekt i alle medlemsstaterne?
Does the Commission take the view that this Directive is being correctly applied in all Member States?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe for at sikre, at denne lovgivning anvendes korrekt?
What action will the Commission take to ensure that this legislation is correctly applied?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3494/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3494/04
Om: Behandling af spildevandsudledninger fra irske byer
Subject: Treatment of wastewater discharges from Irish towns and cities
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3495/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3495/04
Om: Manglende rapportering om pesticidet methylbromid i Irland
Subject: Failure to report on the use of the pesticide Methyl Bromide in Ireland
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3496/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3496/04
Om: Meddelelse om gennemførelse i national ret i Irland af direktivet om handel med kvoter for drivhusgasemissioner
Subject: Notification of the transposition of the Emissions Trading Directive in Ireland
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet eller foreslår den at træffe i dette spørgsmål?
What action has the Commission taken, or is it proposing to take, in this matter?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3497/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3497/04
Om: Uautoriserede affaldsaktiviteter i Irland
Subject: Unauthorised waste activities in Ireland
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3498/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3498/04
Om: Overholdelse af Domstolens dom i sag C-67/02 (direktiv om skaldyrsvande)
Subject: Compliance with European Court of Justice ruling in Case C-67/02 (Shellfish Waters Directive)
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3499/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3499/04
Om: Overholdelse af Domstolens dom i sag C-117/00 (vilde fugle i Owenduff-Nephin Beg-bjergene i Mayo)
Subject: Compliance with European Court of Justice ruling in Case C-117/00 (wild birds at Owenduff-Nephin Beg mountains in Mayo)
Hvilket svar om noget har Kommissionen fået fra den irske regering på den åbningsskrivelse, som den gav meddelelse om i IP/04/894 (13. juli 2004) vedrørende Irlands tilsyneladende manglende overholdelse af Domstolens dom af 13. juni 2002 (sag C-117/00) vedrørende ødelæggelsen af levestederne for vilde fugle i Owenduff-Nephin Beg-bjergene i grevskabet Mayo?
What response, if any, has the Commission received from the Irish Government in response to the letter of formal notice that it announced in IP/04/894 (13 July 2004) regarding Ireland's apparent failure to comply with the 13 June 2002 ruling by the European Court of Justice (Case C-117/00) regarding the deterioration of wild bird habitats at the Owenduff-Nephin Beg mountains in County Mayo?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3500/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3500/04
Om: Irlands manglende reaktion på Kommissionens henvendelser vedrørende anvendelsen af punktafgiftsdirektivet på tobak
Subject: Ireland's failure to comply with the Commission investigation into the application of the Directive on Excise Duties on Tobacco
Er samtlige ministre forpligtede til at samarbejde med Kommissionen, når der gennemføres formelle undersøgelser i henhold til traktaterne?
Are all Government Ministers obliged to cooperate with formal Commission investigations under the EU Treaties?
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet - eller hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe - i denne sag?
What action has the Commission taken, or will be taking, in this matter?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3501/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3501/04
Om: Punktafgifter på tobak
Subject: Excise duties on tobacco
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Kommissionen truffet - eller hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe - i denne sag?
What action has the Commission taken, or will it be taking, in this matter?