natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I bilaget til Kommissionens fælles svar på forespørgsel E-­4449/­07 til E-­4455/­07 findes en liste over 78 organisationer, som den støtter, ud af den liste på 150 organisationer, jeg spurgte om.
In the annex to its joint answer to Questions E‑4449/07 to E‑4455/07, the Commission lists 78 organisations that it funds, from the list of over 150 organisations that I had asked about.
Mine egne undersøgelser har afsløret, at mange flere organisationer på denne liste modtager støtte fra Kommissionen.
My own research has uncovered that many more of the organisations on that list are funded by the Commission.
Nogle organisationer, som Kommissionen har udeladt i sit svar til Parlamentet — som f.eks. BEUC — Den Europæiske Forbrugerorganisation og Koalitionen til fordel for Den Internationale Straffedomstol — redegør åbent for deres finansieringskilder på deres websteder.
Some organisations that the Commission omitted in its Parliamentary answer — such as BEUC, the European Consumers Organisation, and the Coalition for the International Criminal Court — openly admit their funding sources on their websites.
Har Kommissionen givet mig et vildledende svar, a) fordi den forsøger at skjule den støtte, den yder til visse lobbyorganisationer som f.eks. de ovenfor nævnte, eller b) fordi den har en så lemfældig holdning til skatteydernes penge, at den ikke aner, hvem eller hvad den støtter?
Did the Commission provide me with a misleading answer (a) because it was attempting to conceal funding it provides for certain lobbying organisations such as those mentioned above; or (b) because it has such a lax attitude to spending taxpayers' money that it has no idea who or what it has been funding?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0400/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0400/08
Om: Forespørgsler E‑4449/­07 til E‑4455/­07
Subject: Questions E‑4449/07 to E-4455/07
Har nogen af nedenstående organisationer modtaget midler fra Kommissionen siden 2005, og i bekræftende fald hvor mange og hvornår?
Have any of the following organisations received money from the European Commission since 2005, and if so how much and over what period of time?
Den Frie Faglige Internationale —
International Confederation of Free Trade Unions —
Sammenslutningen af Landbrugsorganisationer i EU — COPA —
COPA — Committee of Professional Agricultural Organisations —
Den Europæiske Forbrugerorganisation — BEUC —
European Consumer Organisation — BEUC —
Confrontations Europe —
Confrontations Europe —
Notre Europe —
Notre Europe —
Konrad‑Adenauer‑Stiftung Brüssel —
Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Brüssel —
Friedrich‑Ebert‑Stiftung Brüssel —
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Brüssel —
Fondation Jean‑Jaurès —
Fondation Jean-Jaurès —
Friedrich‑Naumann‑Stiftung Brüssel —
Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung Brüssel —
Heinrich‑Böll‑Stiftung Brüssel
Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Brüssel
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0401/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0401/08
Om: Forespørgsler E-­4449/­07 til E-­4455/­07
Subject: Questions E 4449/07 to E 4455/07
Grüne Bildungswerkstatt —
Grüne Bildungswerkstatt —
Alfred Mozer Stichting - AMS —
Alfred Mozer Stichting — AMS —
Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung Brüssel —
Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung Brüssel —
Det Europæiske Værdipapirtilsynsudvalg —
Committee of European Securities Regulators —
Babel International —
Babel International —
Foundation for Education for Democracy —
Foundation for Education for Democracy —
Centre for Public Policy PROVIDUS —
Centre for Public Policy PROVIDUS —
Institut für Europäische Politik —
Institut für Europäische Politik —
European Public Law Center (EPLC).
European Public Law Center (EPLC)
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0402/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0402/08
Om: Forespørgsler E-­4449/­07 til E-­4455/­07
Subject: Questions E-4449/07 to E-4455/07
Det Europæiske Kontor for Mindre Anvendte Sprog (EBLUL) —
European Bureau for Lesser Used Languages-EBLUL —
Det Europæiske Center for Naturbevarelse —
European Center for Nature Conservation —
BirdLife International European Community Office (del af »Green Ten« netværket) —
BirdLife International European Community Office (part of the ‘Green Ten’ network) —
Den Europæiske Føderation for Transport og Miljø (del af »Green Ten« netværket) —
European Federation for Transport and Environment (part of the ‘Green Ten’ network) —
WWF European Policy Office (del af »Green Ten« netværket) —
WWF European Policy Office (part of the ‘Green Ten’ network) —
CEE Bankwatch Network (del af »Green Ten« netværket) —
CEE Bankwatch Network (part of the ‘Green Ten’ network) —
Koalitionen til fordel for Den Internationale Straffedomstol —
Coalition for the International Criminal Court —
Foro Civil Euromed —
Foro Civil Euromed —
Det Europæiske Forbindelseskontor for Fredsopbygning — EPLO.
The European Peacebuilding Liaison Office — EPLO
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0403/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0403/08
Om: Forespørgsler E‑4449/­07 til E‑4455/­07
Subject: Questions E-4449/07 to E-4455/07
PLAN International —
PLAN International —
People and Planet —
People and Planet —
Organisationen for Ikke‑repræsenterede Nationer og Folk (UNPO) —
Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organisation (UNPO) —
Den Europæiske Civilsamfundsplatform for Livslang Læring (EUCIS‑LLL) —
European Civil Society Platform on Lifelong Learning (EUCIS-LLL) —
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0404/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0404/08
Om: Cykler med tog
Subject: Bicycles on trains
Det fremgår af artikel 5 i den nyligt vedtagne lovgivningsmæssige beslutning P6_TA(2007)0005 med henblik på vedtagelse af en forordning om internationale jernbanepassagerers rettigheder og forpligtelser (5892/1/2006 — C6-0311/2006 — 2004/0049(COD)), at »Alle tog, inklusive internationale tog og højhastighedstog, skal give passagererne mulighed for, i givet fald mod betaling, at medtage barnevogne, kørestole, cykler og sportsudstyr i multirum, der er beregnet til dette formål«.
The recently adopted legislative resolution P6_TA(2007)0005 with a view to the adoption of a regulation on International rail passengers' rights and obligations (5892/1/2006 — C6-0311/2006 — 2004/0049(COD)), states at Article 5, that ‘All trains, including international and high-speed trains, shall provide, where appropriate for a fee, a specially designated area enabling passengers to bring on to the train baby carriages, wheelchairs, bicycles and sports equipment’.
I artikel 12 i bilag I bestemmes følgende: »Alle tog, inklusive internationale tog og højhastighedstog, skal give passagererne mulighed for at medtage barnevogne, kørestole, cykler og sportsudstyr i multirum, der er beregnet til dette formål«.
Article 12 states ‘All trains, including international and high-speed trains, must provide a specially designated area enabling passengers to bring on to the train baby carriages, wheelchairs, bicycles and sports equipment.’
Har Kommissionen planer om at gennemføre disse foranstaltninger i medlemsstaterne?
Has the Commission any plans for the implementation of these measures in the Member States?
Har Kommissionen nogen planer om at sikre, at alle togstationer er tilgængelige med cykel?
Has the Commission any plans to ensure that all train stations are accessible by bicycle?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0405/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0405/08
Om: Minimumsstandarder for kvaliteten af cykelinfrastruktur i Europa
Subject: Minimum quality standards for cycling infrastructure in Europe
Findes der nogen relevante minimumsstandarder for kvaliteten af cykelinfrastruktur, der opføres med EU‑støtte?
Are there any relevant minimum quality standards for cycling infrastructure built with the aid of European subsidies?
Hvis der ikke findes nogen, har Kommissionen så planer om at fremsætte forslag desangående?
If not, does the Commission plan to put forward a proposal in this area?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0406/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0406/08
Om: Det europæiske net af cykelruter
Subject: European network of cycle routes
I Kommissionens udkast til forslag K(2007) 2158 til en beslutning om udvælgelse af projekter til det flerårige program for transeuropæiske transportnet for perioden 2007-2013 vedrører ingen prioriterede projekter cykling.
In its draft proposal C(2007) 2158 for a decision on the selection of projects for the multi-annual programme 2007‑13 on the trans-European transport network, no single priority project is on cycling.
Mener Kommissionen, at der bør være et europæisk net af cykelruter?
Does the European Commission think that there should be a European network of cycle routes?
Hvilke finansieringsmuligheder i forbindelse med etablering og vedligeholdelse har den i bekræftende fald planlagt?
If so, what funding possibilities for its construction and maintenance does it envisage?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0407/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0407/08
Om: Støtte til ngo'er
Subject: NGO subventions
Kommissionen bedes oplyse, hvilke af nedenstående organisationer der har modtaget støtte fra Kommissionen i 2006 eller 2007, og hvor meget hver enkelt organisation modtog.
Could the Commission state which of the following organisations received grants from the Commission in 2006 or 2007 and the amount received?
Den Frie Faglige Internationale (FFI); COPA — Sammenslutningen af Landbrugsorganisationer i EU (COPA); Den Europæiske Forbrugerorganisation — BEUC; Confrontations Europe; Notre Europe; CEPS — Det Europæiske Center for Politiske Studier; Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Brüssel; Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Brüssel; Fondation Jean-Jaurès; Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung Brüssel; Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Brüssel; Grüne Bildungswerkstatt; Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung; Alfred Mozer Stichting — AMS; Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung Brüssel; Det Europæiske Værdipapirtilsynsudvalg (CESR); Babel International; act4europe; Foundation for Education for Democracy; Centre for Public Policy PROVIDUS; Institut für Europäische Politik; European Public Law Center (EPLC); Det Europæiske Kontor for Mindre Anvendte Sprog (EBLUL); Det Europæiske Forum for Kunst og Kulturarv; Den Europæiske Kulturfond; Det Europæiske Center for Naturbevarelse; BirdLife International European Community Office; Den Europæiske Føderation for Transport og Miljø; Friends of the Earth Europe; Friends of Nature International; WWF European Policy Office; CEE Bankwatch Network; Koalitionen til fordel for Den Internationale Straffedomstol (CICC); Foro Civil Euromed; Det Europæiske Forbindelseskontor for Fredsopbygning — EPLO; Det Internationale Menneskerettighedsforbund (FIDH); Den Internationale Føderation Terre des Hommes; Minority Rights Group International; PLAN International; World Vision; People and Planet; Organisationen for Ikke‑repræsenterede Nationer og Folk (UNPO).
International Confederation of Free Trade Unions; COPA — Committee of Professional Agricultural Organisations; European Consumer Organisation — BEUC; Confrontations Europe; Notre Europe; CEPS — Centre for European Policy Studies; Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Brüssel; Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Brüssel; Fondation Jean-Jaurès; Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung Brüssel; Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Brüssel; Grüne Bildungswerkstatt; Rosa-Luxembourg-Stiftung; Alfred Mozer Stichting — AMS; Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung Brüssel; Committee of European Securities Regulators; Babel International; act4europe; Foundation for Education for Democracy; Centre for Public Policy PROVIDUS; Institut für Europäische Politik; European Public Law Center (EPLC); European Bureau for Lesser Used Languages-EBLUL; European Forum of the Arts and Heritage; European Cultural Foundation; European Center for Nature Conservation; BirdLife International European Community Office; European Federation for Transport and Environment; Friends of the Earth Europe; Friends of Nature International; WWF European Policy Office; CEE Bankwatch Network; Coalition for the International Criminal Court; Foro Civil Euromed; The European Peacebuilding Liaison Office — EPLO; International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH); International Federation Terre des Hommes; Minority Rights Group International; PLAN International; World Vision; People and Planet; Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organisation (UNPO).
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0408/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0408/08
Den Nationale Sammenslutning af Kvinder i Finland; Social Platform; PLATFORM; Den Internationale Bevægelse ATD Fourth World; Eurodiaconia; den europæiske sammenslutning for udbydere af tjenester til handicappede (European Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities); Den Kooperative Europæiske Samarbejdsorganisation (CECOP); Den Europæiske Komité for Almennyttige Organisationer (CEDAG); Den Europæiske Føderation af Nationale Sammenslutninger, der Arbejder med de Hjemløse (FEANTSA); Den Europæiske Forening for Ulønnede Forældre og Plejere i Hjemmet (FEFAF); Det Europæiske Koordineringsudvalg for Almennyttige Boliger (CECODHAS); International Council on Social Welfare (ICSW); Det Europæiske Børnenetværk (Europnet); Workability Europe; Røde Kors/­EU‑kontor; Europæisk Netværk for Arbejdsløse (ENU); Den Europæiske Civilsamfundsplatform for Livslang Læring (EUCIS- LLL); Concord; Den østrigske EU-NGO platform; ACODEV; COPROGRAM; Caritas Europa; CBM – Christian Blind Mission; Den danske EU-NGO platform; EU‑CORD; Eurodad; Eurostep; Coordination SUD; International Forum on Development Service; HAND — Den ungarske sammenslutning af ngo'er for udvikling og humanitær bistand; Biedrība »Latvijas Platforma attīstības sadarbībai« (LAPAS); PARTOS; PLAN; ZAGRANICA; Plataforma Portuguesa das ONGD; Red Barnet; MVRO – Den slovakiske ngo-platform; CONGDE; Terre des Hommes; WIDE.
The National Council of Women of Finland; Social Platform; PLATFORM; ATD Fourth World International Movement; Eurodiaconia; European Association of Service Providers for Persons with Disabilities (EASPD); European Confederation of Workers’ Cooperatives, Social Cooperatives and Participative Enterprises (CECOP); European Council for Non Profit Organisations (CEDAG); European Federation of National Organisations Working with Homeless (FEANTSA); European Federation of Unpaid Parents and Carers at Home (FEFAF); European Liaison Committee for Social Housing (CECODHAS); International Council on Social Welfare (ICSW); The European Children's Network (Euronet); Workability Europe; Red Cross/EU Office; European Network of the Unemployed (ENU); European Civil Society Platform on Lifelong Learning (EUCIS- LLL); Concord; EU‑ Plattform — Austrian National Platform; ACODEV; COPROGRAM; Caritas Europa; CBM — Christian Blind Mission; Danish EU‑NGO National Platform; EU‑CORD; Eurodad; Eurostep; Coordination SUD; Internation Forum on Development Service; HAND — Hungarian Association of NGOs for Development and Humanitarian Aid; Biedrība ‘Latvijas Platforma attīstības sadarbībai’ (LAPAS); PARTOS; PLAN; ZAGRANICA; Plataforma Portuguesa das ONGD; Save The Children; MVRO — The Slovak NGDO Platform; CONGDE; Terre des Hommes; WIDE.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0409/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0409/08
Om: Europæisk fordømmelse af den fatwa, der er blevet udstedt af Al Azhar‑universitetet
Subject: Europe should adopt a position against the fatwa issued by Al Azhar University
Det anføres i en fatwa udstedt af sheik Abdel Fattah Al Azhar, den næstøverste leder af Al Azhar-universitetet i Egypten, at »der ikke overvejes nogen dialog mellem islam og judaisme«, med den begrundelse, at det først vil være muligt at indgå i en dialog med jøderne, når Israel er udslettet, som det pågældende islamiske universitet allerede tidligere har meddelt.
A fatwa pronounced by Sheikh Abdel Fattah Al Azhar, the number two at Al Azhar University in Egypt, states that ‘dialogue between Islam and Judaism is not contemplated’, on the grounds — already previously stated by the same Islamic University — that dialogue with the Jews will only be possible once Israel has been eliminated.
Denne fatwa er en retlig proklamation baseret på sharialovgivningen og udtrykker den mest rendyrkede form for islamisk fundamentalisme, der allerede på betænkelig vis er kommet til udtryk i Italien i form af offentlige prædikener, hvori der slås til lyd for »hellig krig« mod »islams fjender«. —
This fatwa is a legal proclamation based on Sharia law, and expresses the purest Islamic fundamentalism, serious expressions of which have also been witnessed in the past — in every instance I am thinking of cases in Italy — with public sermons advocating ‘holy war’ against ‘the enemies of Islam’. —
Hvad er Kommissionens vurdering af det forhold, at man i Rom som i andre europæiske storbyer, hvor der er etableret moskeer og islamiske centre, rent faktisk gennemfører den ideologiske ekstremismes diktater, der er inspireret af storimamen ved Al Azhar‑universitetet i Kairo og hans lære? —
What is the Commission's assessment of the fact that in Rome, as in other major European cities where there are mosques and Islamic centres, the dictates of the ideological extremism inspired by the teachings of the Grand Imam of Al Azhar University in Cairo, Sheikh Mohammed Sayed Tantawi, are effectively being obeyed? —
Agter Kommissionen ikke at fordømme denne og lignende fatwaer, som utvetydig støtter islamisk terrorisme og modsætter sig den dialog mellem religioner, som EU‑institutionerne går stærkt ind for? —
Will not the Commission condemn this and similar fatwas which explicitly support Islamic terrorism and oppose the inter-religious dialogue which is strongly supported by the European institutions? —
Vil Kommissionen rette henvendelse til den italienske regering for at få den til at ophæve de aftaler, der er indgået mellem Al Azhar‑universitetet og fem italienske universiteter, eftersom intet EU‑land bør dække over og støtte Al Azhar‑universitetet, der er en vigtig platform for den internationale islamiske fundamentalistiske doktrin og ideologi?
As no EU country should provide cover and support for Al Azhar University, which is a prime source of international Islamic fundamentalist doctrine and ideology, will the Commission contact the Italian Government to seek the termination of the agreements which have been concluded between Al Azhar University and five Italian universities?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0410/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0410/08
Om: Forslag til direktiv om indrejse- og opholdsbetingelser for tredjelandsstatsborgere med henblik på højt kvalificeret beskæftigelse
Subject: Proposal for a directive on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of highly qualified employment
Jeg har med stor interesse læst Kommissionens forslag til et direktiv om indrejse- og opholdsbetingelser for tredjelandsstatsborgere med henblik på højt kvalificeret beskæftigelse (KOM(2007)0637)
I have read the Commission’s proposal for a directive on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of highly qualified employment (COM(2007)0637) with great interest.
I første omgang ser forslaget imidlertid i nogle henseender ud til at være mere bureaukratisk end den nationale ordning i Nederlandene, den såkaldte »ordning for højt kvalificerede tredjelandsstatsborgere«.
However, at first sight the proposal seems from some points of view to be more bureaucratic than the national legislation in the Netherlands (the ‘kennismigrantenregeling’).
Konkrete eksempler på dette er den foreslåede oprindelige gyldighedsperiode for »blue card« på højst to år samt medlemsstaternes mulighed for at anvende en arbejdsmarkedstest, ikke kun ved første indrejse, men også ved mobilitet inden for EU.
Concrete examples of this are the proposed maximum 2-year initial period of validity for the Blue Card and the possible application of a labour market test by the Member States, not only in the case of the first entry permit, but also for intra-EU mobility.
Kan Kommissionen forsikre, at direktivet skal supplere den nationale ordning for højt kvalificerede tredjelandsstatsborgere og derfor ikke erstatter denne ordning?
Can the Commission assure me that the proposal for a directive is supplementary to the national kennismigrantenregeling and does not, therefore, replace the kennismigrantenregeling?
Kan Kommissionen desuden forsikre, at direktivet vil give medlemsstaterne mulighed for fortsat at lade gunstigere nationale regler for højt kvalificerede migranters indrejse være gældende?
Can the Commission assure me that the proposal for a directive leaves room for the continuing existence and use by the Member States of more favourable national laws on the admission of highly qualified migrants?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0411/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0411/08
Om: Religiøs forskelsbehandling af kristne hos British Airways: Nadia Eweida‑sagen
Subject: Discrimination against the Christian religion by British Airways — the case of Nadia Eweida
I november 2006 forbød luftfartsselskabet British Airways en af sine ansatte, Nadia Eweida, at bære et kristent kors om halsen.
In November 2006, the airline British Airways banned one of its employees, Nadia Eweida, from wearing a traditional cross around her neck.
Da hun protesterede, blev hun suspenderet fra sit arbejde.
When she protested, she was suspended from all professional duties.
Arbejdsretten afgjorde for nylig, at Nadia Eweida havde overtrådt virksomhedens interne reglement uden gyldig grund, og hun blev ikke genindsat i stillingen.
An employment tribunal found that Nadia Eweida had breached company rules without good reason and she was not reinstated.
Der er tale om en ubegrundet begrænsning af samvittigheds‑ og religionsfriheden.
This constitutes an unjustifiable restriction on the freedom of religion and freedom of conscience.
Den holdning, som det britiske selskab og retten indtog i denne sag, er i strid med artikel 18 i verdenserklæringen om menneskerettigheder og artikel 9 i den europæiske menneskerettighedskonvention, som Storbritannien er forpligtet til at overholde.
The stance taken by the British company and tribunal is contrary to Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, by which the United Kingdom is bound.
Kommissionen bør gribe ind i denne sag ved selv at forelægge EF‑Domstolen spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt en sådan praksis er i overensstemmelse med folkerettens ovennævnte regler.
The Commission should address this matter by taking measures itself and by referring the question of the compatibility of these practices with the above international legal instruments to the European Court of Justice.
Hvilke skridt agter Kommissionen at tage i denne sag?
What action can we expect the Commission to take in this matter?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0412/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0412/08
Om: Statsstøtte til offentlige virksomheder på momsområdet
Subject: State aid to public enterprises by way of VAT
Med henvisning til tidligere skriftlige spørgsmål P‑0458/06 fra Karin Riis‑Jørgensen til Kommissionen og svar afgivet af kommissær Neelie Kroes den 14.3.2006 og den 25.1.2007 vedrørende lønsumsafgift:
Further to my earlier Written Question P‑0458/06 to the Commission, and the answers given by Commissioner Neelie Kroes on 14 March 2006 and 25 January 2007 on the Danish payroll tax, I should like to ask the following question:
I Danmark kan kommuner via det mellemkommunale momsudligningssystem fratrække indgående moms (købemoms) på momsfrie områder som f.eks. hospitalsområdet, sundhed, forebyggelse og genoptræning, tandpleje, pleje og omsorg for ældre, undervisning og bustransport.
In Denmark, through the inter-communal VAT compensation scheme, local authorities can deduct input VAT (VAT on purchases) in VAT-exempt areas such as the hospital sector, healthcare, prevention and rehabilitation, dental care, the care of elderly people, education and bus transport.
Private virksomheder, som konkurrerer med offentlige virksomheder på disse områder, kan ikke fratrække købemomsen.
Private undertakings which compete with public undertakings in these areas may not deduct VAT on purchases.
Det betyder, at private virksomheder er ringere stillet i konkurrencen om offentlige opgaver, når der konkurreres med offentlige virksomheder.
That means that private undertakings are at a disadvantage when tendering for public contracts in competition with public undertakings.