natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Generalsekretariatet for Rådet fører en politik for anvendelse af videosystemer, der tager sigte på at garantere sikkerheden for Rådets medlemmer, personale, delegerede og andre besøgende såvel som dets bygninger, aktiver og oplysninger i overensstemmelse med retningslinjerne af 17. marts 2010 fra Den Europæiske Tilsynsførende for Databeskyttelse (EDPS).
The Council General Secretariat applies a policy on the use of video systems aimed at ensuring the security and safety of Council members, staff, delegates and other visitors, as well as of its buildings, assets and information, in compliance with the guidelines issued on 17 March 2010 by the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS).
Generalsekretariatet for Rådet offentliggør ingen detaljerede oplysninger om antallet og typen af sikkerhedskameraer, der benyttes til videobeskyttelse i Rådets bygninger i betragtning af sådanne oplysningers følsomme karakter.
The Council General Secretariat does not disclose publicly detailed information concerning the number and type of security cameras used for video protection on Council premises in view of the sensitive nature of such information.
Generalsekretariatet for Rådet kan imidlertid oplyse det ærede parlamentsmedlem om, at der i øjeblikket anvendes omkring 360 kameraer til sikkerhedsformål i Rådets bygninger.
However, the Council General Secretariat can inform the Honourable Member that approximately 360 cameras are currently used for security purposes in its premises.
Rådssekretariatets Sikkerhedskontor har en central sikkerhedsenhed, der er operationel 24 timer i døgnet, 7 dage om ugen, og som overvåger sikkerhedskameraerne.
The Security Office of the Council General Secretariat operates a 24/7 Central Security Dispatch which monitors security cameras.
Denne enhed er permanent bemandet med to medarbejdere på grundlag af en turnusordning.
The Dispatch is permanently staffed by two agents on a rota basis.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011254/2010
Question for written answer E-011254/2010
Om: Kameraer på Kommissionens bygninger
Subject: Cameras in Commission buildings
Hvor mange overvågningskameraer benyttes der til videoovervågning af hver enkelt af Kommissionens bygninger, opdelt efter kameratype og bygning?
How many surveillance cameras are used for video surveillance of the various Commission buildings, broken down by camera type and building?
Hvor mange overvågningskameraer benyttes der til videoovervågning af de enkelte EU‑ agenturer, opdelt efter kameratype og agentur?
How many surveillance cameras are used for video surveillance of the various EU agencies, broken down by camera type and agency?
Hvor meget har udgifterne til videoovervågning af hver enkelt af Kommissionens bygninger (anskaffelse, vedligeholdelse, overvågningspersonale osv.) udgjort siden 2000, opdelt efter år og bygning?
How high have the costs of video surveillance of the various Commission buildings (procurement, maintenance, surveillance staff, etc.) been since 2000, broken down by year and building?
Hvor mange dome‑kameraer benytter Kommissionen til overvågning af sine bygninger?
How many dome cameras does the Commission deploy for surveillance of its buildings?
Hvor mange dome‑kameraer har Kommissionen anskaffet siden 2000, opdelt efter år?
How many dome cameras have been purchased by the Commission since 2000, broken down by year?
Hvor mange dome‑kameraer er der installeret i de enkelte EU‑agenturer?
How many dome cameras are installed in the various EU agencies?
Hvor meget personale har været beskæftiget med videoovervågning i hver enkelt af Kommissionens bygninger siden 2000, opdelt efter år og bygning?
How many staff have been employed in the area of video surveillance in the various Commission buildings since 2000, broken down by year and building?
Hvor meget personale har været beskæftiget med videoovervågning i de enkelte EU‑agenturer siden 2000, opdelt efter år og agentur?
How many staff have been employed in the area of video surveillance in the various EU agencies since 2000, broken down by year and agency?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011255/2010
Question for written answer E-011255/2010
Hvor ofte er den europæiske arrestordre blevet anvendt, siden den blev indført, opdelt efter år, kategori af lovovertrædelse og medlemsstat?
How often has the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) been used since its introduction, with a breakdown by year, category of offence and Member State?
I hvilke tilfælde har en udleveringsanmodning i henhold til den europæiske arrestordre ikke kunnet efterkommes?
In which cases has an extradition request under the EAW been unable to be carried out?
I Westminster førte man i slutningen af 2010 forhandlinger for at imødegå Polens anmodning om udlevering af Jacek Jaskolski.
At the end of 2010 a hearing was held in Westminster in connection with Poland's request for the extradition of Jacek Jaskolski.
For 10 år siden havde han overtrukket sin konto, men banken havde fået sine penge igen.
10 years ago Mr Jaskolski had exceeded his overdraft limit; the bank got its money back.
Hvad mener Kommissionen om, at den europæiske arrestordre benyttes i sådanne bagatelsager?
How does the Commission view the use of the EAW in such trivial cases?
Hvad mener Kommissionen om den opfattelse, at det er uheldigt for offentlighedens tillid til EU‑medlemsstaternes strafferet, at den europæiske arrestordre benyttes i sådanne bagatelsager?
How does the Commission view the assessment that public confidence in criminal law in European Member States is being undermined by the use of the EAW in such trivial cases?
Har Kommissionen planer om at revidere den europæiske arrestordre vedrørende sådanne bagatelsager?
Does the Commission plan to revise the EAW in relation to such trivial cases?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011256/2010
Question for written answer E-011256/2010
Om: EU skal kraftigt opfordre Beijing til at afsløre, hvor 20 uyghurer, der er deporteret fra Cambodja til Kina, befinder sig — anvendelse af artikel 1 i samarbejdsaftalen
Subject: The European Union must urge Beijing to disclose the whereabouts of the 20 Uyghurs deported from Cambodia to China — Application of Article 1 of the cooperation agreement
Den 19. december sidste år overførte den cambodjanske regering i åbenlys modstrid med internationale procedurer 20 uyghurer, før FN's Flygtningehøjkommissær (UNHCR) kunne træffe en beslutning om deres flygtningestatus.
In patent breach of international procedures, on 19 December last year the Cambodian Government transferred 20 Uyghurs before the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) could make a decision about their refugee status.
Siden da har Kina som sædvanlig belønnet Cambodja for landets samarbejdsholdning ved at underskrive en aftale om at yde 1,2 mia. USD i støtte til Cambodja.
Since then, as usual, China has rewarded Cambodia for its collaborative stance by signing an agreement to provide USD 1.2 billion in aid to Cambodia.
Phnom Penh returnerede disse uyghurer til Kina, vel vidende at de ville blive udsat for grov forfølgelse fra statens side, hvorved Pnom Penh overtrådte FN‑konventionen fra 1951 om flygtninges retsstilling og 1967‑protokollen til flygtningekonventionen, som Kina er part i.
Phnom Penh returned these Uyghurs to China knowing that they would encounter harsh persecution from the State, violating the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol to the Refugee Convention, to which China is a party.
Gruppen af uyghurer var flygtet til Cambodja og søgte beskyttelse fra UNHCR her efter protester og etnisk opstand i juli 2009 i Urumqi, den regionale hovedstad i Østturkestan (også kendt som den kinesiske selvstyrende region Xinjiang Uyghur).
The group of Uyghurs had fled to Cambodia and sought protection from UNHCR there following protests and ethnic unrest in July 2009 in Urumqi, the regional capital of East Turkestan (also known as the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China).
En af uyghurerne i gruppen var flygtet til Cambodja umiddelbart før juli 2009 med et gyldigt visum udstedt af den cambodjanske regering.
One of the Uyghurs in the group had fled to Cambodia shortly before July 2009 with a valid visa issued by the Cambodian government.
Blandt de 19 uyghurer, der flygtede efter begivenhederne i juli 2009, var der uyghurer, som havde været vidne til, at kinesiske sikkerhedsstyrker arresterede og anvendte brutal og dødelig magt over for demonstranter under de fredelige protester fra uyghurer i juli 2009 i Urumqi.
Among the 19 Uyghurs who fled after the July 2009 incidents were Uyghurs who had witnessed Chinese security forces arresting and using brutal and lethal force against demonstrators during the peaceful Uyghur protests in July 2009 in Urumqi.
Et par blandt uyghurerne i gruppen af repatrierede gav øjenvidneberetninger under deres ophold i Cambodja.
A couple of the Uyghurs in the group of returnees gave eyewitness accounts during their time in Cambodia.
Alle 20 uyghurer ansøgte UNHCR om beskyttelse i udlandet.
All of the 20 Uyghurs applied to the UNHCR for protection in a foreign country.
EU skal kraftigt opfordre Beijing til at afsløre, hvor 20 uyghurer, der er deporteret fra Cambodja til Kina, befinder sig.
The European Union must urge Beijing to disclose the whereabouts of the 20 Uyghurs deported from Cambodia to China.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med disse sager og overtrædelser af menneskerettigheder?
Is the Commission aware of these cases and human rights violations?
Hvilke konkrete henvendelser har Kommissionen rettet til de kinesiske og cambodjanske ikkedemokratiske regeringer?
What concrete representations has it made to the Chinese and Cambodian non-democratic governments?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011257/2010
Question for written answer E-011257/2010
Om: Påvisning og sporing af genmodificerede planter i EU
Subject: Detection and traceability of genetically modified crops in Europe
Kommissionen svarede den 28. maj 2010 på skriftlig forespørgsel P‑2852/10 vedrørende påvisning og sporing af genmodificerede planter i EU ved at henvise til følgende tekster: direktiv 2001/18/EF, forordning (EF) nr. 1829/2003 og forordning (EF) nr. 641/2004.
On 28 May 2010, the Commission gave its answer to Question P‑2852/10 on the detection and traceability of genetically modified crops in Europe with reference to the following legislation: Directive 2001/18/EC, Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and Regulation (EC) No 641/2004.
Det oprindelige spørgsmål vedrørte Kommissionens mulighed for at garantere, at alle genmodificerede planter, som er godkendt i EU, specifikt og entydigt kan påvises og spores på alle anvendelsesstadier af det plantemateriale, hvor den eller de transgene kendetegn skal kunne påvises og spores.
The initial question concerned the Commission’s ability to guarantee that all genetically modified (GM) crops authorised within the EU can be detected and traced in a specific, unambiguous manner at each stage of plant usage that requires the GM trait or traits to be detectable and traceable.
Endvidere blev Kommissionen spurgt om dens mulighed for at garantere, at de af ansøgeren anvendte metoder, som er godkendt af Det Fælles Forskningscenter inden tilladelsen gives, og de gennemførte analyseprotokoller af dna i overensstemmelse med anbefalingerne fra ENGL, gør det muligt effektivt at skelne en gmo med flere transformationsbegivenheder fra en blanding af forskellige gmo’er hver indeholdende en enkelt transformationsbegivenhed, som er til stede i gmo’en.
The Commission was also questioned on whether it could guarantee that the methods put forward by the notifiers and validated by the Joint Research Centre before authorisation, and the analysis protocols carried out with DNA as the unit of measurement in accordance with ENGL recommendations, actually allow for a distinction to be made between a GM crop containing several modifications (a stacked crop) and a mix of GM crops each containing only one of the modifications present in the stacked GM crop.
Ved at begrænse sit svar til partier af genmodificerede planter i form af frø har Kommissionen ikke svaret på spørgsmålet vedrørende dens mulighed for at skelne en gmo med flere transformationsbegivenheder fra en blanding af forskellige gmo’er hver indeholdende en enkelt transformationsbegivenhed, hvor denne blanding indeholder fuldstændig de samme transformationsbegivenheder som gmo’en med flere transformationsbegivenheder, uanset i hvilken form disse planter foreligger i EU.
In restricting its answer purely to GM crops as single seed or grain lots, the Commission did not answer the question posed concerning its ability to make a distinction between a GM crop containing several modifications (a stacked crop) and a mix of GM crops each containing only one modification, with this mixture containing solely the same modifications as those in the stacked GM crop, irrespective of the form in which these crops are present within Europe.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011258/2010
Question for written answer E-011258/2010
José Bové (Verts/ALE) og Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE)
José Bové (Verts/ALE) and Carl Schlyter (Verts/ALE)
Om: Metode til detektion og sporing af den genetisk modificerede Amflorakartoffel (EH92‑527‑1)
Subject: Method of detecting and tracing the genetically modified potato Amflora (EH92-527-1)
Den 2. marts 2010 gav Kommissionen tilladelse til dyrkning på europæisk territorium af den genmodificerede Amflorakartoffel (EH92‑527‑1), som er udviklet af den tyske virksomhed BASF.
On 2 March 2010, the Commission authorised cultivation within the EU of the genetically modified (GM) potato Amflora (EH92‑527‑1), developed by the German company BASF.
Denne tilladelse blev bl.a. givet med udgangspunkt i Det Fælles Forskningscenters rapport om validering af den af virksomheden forelagte detektionsmetode af 14. september 2006.
Authorisation was granted largely on the basis of the Joint Research Centre report of 14 September 2006 concerning validation of the detection method furnished by the company.
I deres udtalelse af 28. juli 2010 vurderer de franske eksperter fra det høje råd for bioteknologi I Frankrig har det høje råd for bioteknologi til opgave at oplyse regeringen om alle anliggender vedrørende genetisk modificerede organismer og alle andre bioteknologiske anliggender og at udarbejde udtalelser om vurderingen af de miljø- og folkesundhedsrisici, som indesluttet anvendelse eller frivillig udspredelse af genetisk modificerede organismer kan være forbundet med, og om biologisk overvågning af territoriet (ifølge det franske websted ogm.gouv.fr). , for så vidt angår den af BASF forelagte metode til detektion og sporing af denne kartoffel, at det af ansøgeren foreslåede referencesystem ikke er pålideligt med hensyn til den relative kvantificering.
In their opinion of 28 July 2010, French experts meeting in the Haut Conseil des Biotechnologies In France, the ‘Haut Conseil des biotechnologies’ is tasked (according to the website ogm.gouv.fr) with shedding light for the government on all matters concerning genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or any other biotechnology and with delivering opinions on the assessment of the risks to the environment and public health that contained use or the deliberate release of GMOs may present, and on regional biological monitoring surveillance. considered that, as regards the detection and traceability method BASF has furnished for this potato, ‘in terms of relative quantification, the reference system proposed by the notifier is not reliable.
Systemet, som er baseret på genet UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, indebærer en risiko for krydsreaktion med andre sekvenser fra natskyggefamilien.
The system based on the UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase gene presents risks of a cross-reaction with other solanaceous sequences’.
Med andre ord er BASF's referencegen ikke specifikt for denne kartoffel.
In other words, the reference gene provided by BASF is not specific to the potato.
I henhold til ISO-standarderne 24276 og 21270 samt mindstekravene til ydeevnen, som er fastsat af Det Europæiske Net af GMO-laboratorier (ENGL) ENGL - »Definition of Minimum Performance Requirements for Analytical Methods of GMO Testing European Network of GMO Laboratories«, http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/Min_Perf_Requirements_Analytical_methods.pdf , skal det valgte referencegen imidlertid være specifikt for en art, forefindes i en eneste eller få kopier i genomet, have en sekvens, som bevares fra en sort til en anden, og ikke være genstand for mutation Citat fra Det Fælles Forskningscenters dokument: »For detection of specific GM events, the target sequence shall be event specific.
Yet ISO 24276, ISO 21270 and the minimum performance criteria laid down by the European Network of GMO laboratories (ENGL) ENGL — ‘Definition of Minimum Performance Requirements for Analytical Methods of GMO Testing, European Network of GMO Laboratories’, http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/Min_Perf_Requirements_Analytical_methods.pdf all establish that the reference gene chosen must be specific to a single species, be present in only one or very few copies within the genome, have a sequence that does not change from one variety to the other and must not be subject to mutation Quotation from JRC document: ‘For detection of specific GM events, the target sequence shall be event specific.
For taxon specific target sequences (target sequence), the absence of allelic and copy- number variation across a globally representative and diverse sample of the species variety shall be demonstrated.
For taxon specific target sequences (target sequence), the absence of allelic and copy-number variation across a globally representative and diverse sample of the species variety shall be demonstrated.
Allelic and/or copy-number variation in other lines shall be reported if such variation is known by the applicant.
Allelic and/or copy-number variation in other lines shall be reported if such variation is known by the applicant.
The specificity of the target sequence shall be verified by in silico studies against publicly available sequence databases (e.g.
The specificity of the target sequence shall be verified by in silico studies against publicly available sequence databases (e.g. EMBL, GenBank, etc.) and experimentally by demonstrating the absence of amplification products when the target sequence specific assay is applied to individual PCRs of pure genomic DNA of a representative sample of the closest relatives to the target taxa as well as of the most important food crops.’ .
EMBL, GenBank, etc.) and experimentally by demonstrating the absence of amplification products when the target sequence specific assay is applied to individual PCRs of pure genomic DNA of a representative sample of the closest relatives to the target taxa as well as of the most important food crops.« , hvilket skal sikre dets utvetydige og holdbare identifikation.
This is to assure an unambiguous and solid identification.
Vi anmoder således Kommissionen om at fremlægge de videnskabelige argumenter, der har fået den til at tillade den genetisk modificerede Amflorakartoffel (EH92‑527‑1) på trods af denne uoverensstemmelse med de gældende lovkrav.
We would therefore like to ask the Commission to give us the scientific arguments that have led it to approve the genetically modified potato Amflora (EH92-527-1), despite being at variance with statutory requirements.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011264/2010
Question for written answer E-011264/2010
Om: Fiskeri efter arterne glaskutling, tobis og sardina pilchardus
Subject: Fishing for transparent gobies, sandeels and whitebait
Beslutningen om, hvorvidt det er eller ikke er tilladt at fange en bestemt fiskeart, og på hvilke betingelser, nødvendiggør en indviklet procedure, hvor flere parter er involveret: Den Videnskabelige, Tekniske og Økonomiske Komité for Fiskeri (STECF), Kommissionen og Rådet.
Decisions as to whether a given marine species may be fished or not, and under what conditions, are taken on the basis of a complex procedure involving various bodies: the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), the Commission and the Council.
Hvad angår arterne glaskutling og tobis forventes der truffet en beslutning i 2011, dvs. i forbindelse med fangstårets udløb.
A decision should be taken on transparent gobies and sandeels in February 2011, i.e. at the same time as the fishing season ends.
Situationen er derimod mere indviklet med hensyn til sardinen af arten »sardina pilchardus«, og i denne forbindelse har Kommissionen bedt om yderligere uddybninger for at vurdere ressourcens biologiske tilstand.
The situation concerning whitebait, however, is more complex, as the Commission has made several requests for additional information in order to evaluate the biological state of resources.
Selv om spørgeren er klar over, at det er både nødvendigt og vigtigt at foretage uddybende vurderinger for at verificere nødvendigheden af at forbedre bestemmelser, der tager sigte på at garantere en bæredygtig forvaltning af visse bestande, burde beslutningstagningen foregå hurtigere, eftersom beslutningerne i visse tilfælde (som f.eks. for glaskutling og tobis, men også for sardina pilchardus) vil komme for sent i forhold til fangstperioden.
Notwithstanding the need for and importance of in-depth evaluations to determine the scope for tightening up rules, whose purpose is to guarantee the sustainable management of specific stocks, it would be useful for decisions to be taken more quickly, given that some decisions, including those relating to transparent gobies, sandeels and whitebait, will be taken very late as far as the fishing season is concerned.
Kunne det i øvrigt ikke være hensigtsmæssigt, at disse beslutninger, som fiskeriarbejdernes skæbne jo afhænger af, tildeles en præferentiel plads både i kommissærkollegiets og i Rådets dagsorden?
Should these decisions, on which the livelihoods of fishermen depend, not be fast-tracked by both the Commissioners and the Council?
Rådet henleder det ærede medlems opmærksomhed på, at Rådet i december 2010 indgik en politisk aftale om et forslag fra Kommissionen KOM(2010)0658 endelig. , hvorefter Rådets forordning om fastsættelse for 2011 af fiskerimuligheder blev vedtaget ved skriftlig procedure den 18. januar 2011.
The Council would draw the Honourable Member’s attention to the fact that, following the political agreement reached by the Council in December 2010 on a proposal by the Commission COM(2010)0658 final. , the Council Regulation fixing the fishing opportunities available for 2011 was adopted by written procedure on 18 January 2011.
Hvad angår de øvrige to bestande, som nævnes af det ærede medlem, samt hvordan beslutningstagningen inden for fiskeriforvaltningen kan fremskyndes, vil Rådet overveje alle forslag, som Kommissionen i den forbindelse fremlægger.
As regards the other two stocks mentioned by the Honourable Member, as well as on possible ways to speed up decision-making in fisheries management, the Council will consider any proposal that is submitted by the Commission in this respect.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-011265/2010
Question for written answer E-011265/2010
Om: Vurdering af pesticiders toksiske virkninger på bier
Subject: Assessment of toxic effects of pesticides on bees
GD SANCO, som med rette ønsker at revidere mekanismen til vurdering af systemiske stoffer, har i forbindelse med revisionen fået bistand fra ekspertorganer, nemlig EPPO (Plantebeskyttelsesorganisationen for Europa og Middelhavsområderne).
Keen, rightly, to review the assessment mechanism for systemic substances, DG Sanco commissioned the European Plant Protection Organisation (EPPO), as a body expert in the field, to carry out this work.
Da EPPO også var klar over, at vurderingerne var svage, har den anmodet ICPBR (den internationale kommission til undersøgelse af forbindelserne mellem planter og bier) om at foreslå Kommissionen nye vurderingsretningslinjer.
As EPPO was also aware of flaws in the assessments, it asked the International Commission for Plant-Bee Relationships (ICPBR) to come up with new assessment guidelines for the Commission.