natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Selv om den forældrepart, der ønsker at flytte, er rede til at forpligte sig til at overholde de betingelser, en domstol måtte fastsætte for at sikre den anden forældrepart samvær med barnet, giver de maltesiske domstole ofte kun tilladelse til flytningen, hvis den pågældende giver afkald på forældremyndigheden.
Even though the parent is ready to bind himself/herself to abide to any conditions requested by a court in order to guarantee access to the child by the other parent, the parent wanting to relocate is many times told that the Maltese courts would only consent to such a request upon him/her giving up custody and care of the child.
Dette ville være ensbetydende med at efterlade barnet i hjemlandet.
This would amount to leaving the child behind in the country of origin.
Hvad mener Rådet om disse tilfælde?
What is the Council's opinion on such cases?
Mener Rådet, at Bruxelles II-forordningen og anden relevant lovgivning anvendes korrekt på Malta?
Does the Council think that the Brussels II regulation and other relevant legislation are being properly implemented in Malta?
Rådet har aldrig drøftet dette spørgsmål.
The Council has never debated this question.
Gennemførelsen af Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 2201/­2003 af 27. november 2003 falder inden for Kommissionens kompetenceområde.
The implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 falls within the sphere of competence of the Commission.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3043/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3043/05
Hvad mener Kommissionen om disse tilfælde?
What is the Commission’s opinion on such cases?
Mener Kommissionen, at Bruxelles II-forordningen og anden relevant lovgivning anvendes korrekt på Malta?
Does the Commission think that the Brussels II regulation and other relevant legislation are being properly implemented in Malta?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3044/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3044/05
Om: Støtte til anlæggelse af en tunnel til padder i Ukraine
Subject: Financial support for an underpass for toads in Ukraine
Ifølge beretninger i pressen yder EU ca. 10 mio. EUR i støtte til anlæggelse af en tunnel til padder under en vej i regionen Lvov (Ukraine).
According to press reports, the EU is providing financial support of approximately EUR 10 million for the construction of an underpass for toads in the Lvov region of Ukraine.
Holder disse beretninger stik?
Are these reports accurate?
Er støtten til en sådan foranstaltning i trit med Ukraines basale behov set i lyset af de betydelige mangler i de elementære forsyninger til befolkningen på andre områder?
Does supporting a project of this kind correspond to the urgent needs Ukraine faces given the considerable shortcomings in the provision of essential services to the population in other areas?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3045/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3045/05
Om: Tyrkiets manglende anerkendelse af Cypern
Subject: Non-recognition of Cyprus by Turkey
Den 29. juli undertegnede Tyrkiet efter lang tids tøven protokollen om udvidelse af toldunionen med ti nye medlemsstater.
On 29 July, after a long delay, Turkey signed the protocol extending the customs union to 10 new Member States.
I teksten blev der imidlertid indsat en ensidig erklæring, hvori Tyrkiet fastslår, at undertegnelse, ratificering og gennemførelse af protokollen på ingen måde indebærer anerkendelse af Republikken Cypern.
However, at the same time Turkey issued a unilateral declaration stating that ‘The signing, ratification and implementation of this protocol in no way means recognition of the Republic of Cyprus’.
Det britiske formandskab gjorde tilsyneladende ingen indsigelse i den forbindelse.
The British Presidency evidently did not make any objection to this.
Hvorfor blev anerkendelsen af alle eksisterende medlemsstater ikke gjort til en betingelse for indledning af tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne med Tyrkiet?
Why was recognition of all existing Member States not made a condition for opening the accession negotiations with Turkey?
Drejer det sig ikke om et anliggende af så stor selvfølgelighed, at det end ikke behøvede at indgå i København-kriterierne?
Is this not something which could be taken so much for granted that it did not even need to be included in the Copenhagen criteria?
Frygter Rådet ikke, at der skabes præcedens i den forstand, at andre eller fremtidige kandidatlande nærmest efter eget forgodtbefindende kan bestemme, hvilke medlemsstater de vil anerkende, og hvilke de ikke vil anerkende?
Does not the Council fear that a precedent may have been set here, in that other or future candidate Member States will be able to decide ‘à la carte’ which Member States they recognise and which they do not?
Den tyrkiske regering anfører selv, at dens position ikke vil ændre sig, inden der er fundet en løsning på spørgsmålet om det delte Cypern.
The Turkish Government itself says that its position will not change until there is a solution to the partitioning of Cyprus.
Hvorfor blev tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne så ikke udsat, indtil der reelt er fundet en løsning?
Why then are the accession negotiations not being postponed until such a solution is indeed found?
Vil Tyrkiet nu gøre sine sø- og lufthavne tilgængelige for cypriotiske skibe og fly?
Will Turkey now immediately open its ports and airports to Cypriot vessels and aircraft?
Tidligere har bl.a. udenrigsminister Abdullah Gul erklæret i det tyrkiske parlament den 29. marts, at der ikke kan være tale herom?
Among other previous statements, Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul said on 29 March in the Turkish Parliament that there could be no question of this.
Ifølge de politiske Københavnskriterier, som Det Europæiske Råd vedtog i 1993, kræver EU-­medlemskab som bekendt, at kandidatlandet har stabile institutioner, der er en garant for demokrati, retsstat, menneskerettigheder samt respekt for og beskyttelse af mindretal.
According to the Copenhagen political criteria decided by the European Council in 1993, membership of the EU — as the Honourable Parliamentarian must be aware — requires that a candidate country has achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities.
I december 2004 besluttede Det Europæiske Råd på grundlag af en henstilling og en rapport fra Kommissionen, at Tyrkiet i tilstrækkeligt omfang opfyldte disse kriterier for indledning af tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne, forudsat at landet gennemførte seks nærmere angivne love.
In December 2004, on the basis of a recommendation and a report by the Commission, the European Council decided that Turkey sufficiently fulfilled these criteria for accession negotiations to open, provided that Turkey brought into force six specific pieces of legislation.
Som svar på den erklæring, Tyrkiet fremsatte i forbindelse med undertegnelse af tillægsprotokollen til Ankara-aftalen, vedtog Det Europæiske Fællesskab og dets medlemsstater en erklæring den 21. september 2005.
In response to the declaration made by Turkey at the time of its signature of the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement, a declaration by the European Community and its Member States was adopted on 21 September 2005.
Det gøres i denne erklæring klart, at erklæringen fra Tyrkiet er ensidig, at den ikke er en del af protokollen og ikke har nogen retsvirkning for Tyrkiets forpligtelser i henhold til protokollen.
This declaration made clear that the Turkish declaration is unilateral, does not form part of the Protocol and has no legal effect on Turkey's obligations under the Protocol.
Derudover mindes der om, at Republikken Cypern blev medlem af Den Europæiske Union den 1. maj 2004, og at Det Europæiske Fællesskab og det medlemsstater alene anerkender Republikken Cypern som et folkeretligt subjekt.
Furthermore, it recalled that the Republic of Cyprus became a Member State of the European Union on 1 May 2004, and that the European Community and its Member States recognise only the Republic of Cyprus as a subject of international law.
Det fastsættes endvidere i erklæringen, at anerkendelse af alle medlemsstater er et nødvendigt element i tiltrædelsesprocessen, og det understreges, at Unionen tillægger det stor betydning, at forbindelserne mellem Tyrkiet og alle EU-medlemsstater normaliseres snarest muligt.
The declaration also specified that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process, and underlined the importance the Union attaches to the normalisation of relations between Turkey and all EU Member States, as soon as possible.
Det hedder desuden i erklæringen, at Fællesskabet og dets medlemsstater forventer, at tillægsprotokollen gennemføres fuldt ud på en ikke-diskriminerende måde på alle EU's medlemsstater, og at alle hindringer for de frie varebevægelser fjernes, herunder transportrestriktioner.
In addition, the declaration stated that the Community and its Member States expect full and non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to all EU Member States, and the removal of all obstacles to the free movement of goods, including restrictions on means of transport.
EU vil nøje overvåge dette og i 2006 tage stilling til, om det er gennemført fuldt ud.
The EU will monitor this closely and evaluate full implementation in 2006.
Det understreges, at indledningen af forhandlinger om de relevante kapitler afhænger af, om Tyrkiet iværksætter sine kontraktlige forpligtelser over for alle medlemsstater, og at det vil påvirke de samlede fremskridt i forhandlingerne, hvis Tyrkiet ikke opfylder sine forpligtelser fuldt ud.
It was stressed that the opening of negotiations on the relevant chapters depends on Turkey's implementation of its contractual obligations to all Member States and that failure to implement its obligations in full will affect the overall progress in the negotiations.
Rådet vil sikre en opfølgning i 2006 af de fremskridt, der gøres i alle ovennævnte spørgsmål.
The Council will ensure a follow-up on the progress made on all these issues in 2006.
I lyset af denne erklæring og den ramme for tiltrædelsesforhandlingerne med Tyrkiet, som Rådet vedtog den 3. oktober 2005, er det klart, at Unionen forventer, at Tyrkiet anvender tillægsprotokollen fuldt ud og på en ikke-diskriminerende måde på alle EU's medlemsstater.
In the light of this declaration, and the framework for the accession negotiations with Turkey adopted by the Council on 3 October 2005, it is clear that the Union expects Turkey to apply the Additional Protocol fully and in a non-discriminatory manner to all EU Member States.
Derudover er det også klart, at Unionen tillægger en normalisering af de bilaterale forbindelser stor betydning, da den er af den opfattelse, at anerkendelse af alle medlemsstater er et nødvendigt element i tiltrædelsesprocessen.
Furthermore, it is also clear that the Union attaches importance to the normalisation of bilateral relations, considering that recognition of all Members States is a necessary component of the accession process.
Rådet kan derfor forsikre det ærede parlamentsmedlem om, at det nøje vil følge de fremskridt, der gøres med hensyn til disse spørgsmål.
The Council can assure the Honourable Member that progress on these issues will be closely followed.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3046/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3046/05
Frygter Kommissionen ikke, at der skabes præcedens i den forstand, at andre eller fremtidige kandidatlande nærmest efter eget forgodtbefindende kan bestemme, hvilke medlemsstater de vil anerkende, og hvilke de ikke vil anerkende?
Does not the Commission fear that a precedent may have been set here, in that other or future candidate Member States will be able to decide ‘à la carte’ which Member States they recognise and which they do not?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3048/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3048/05
(22. august 2005)
(22 August 2005)
Om: Arrestationen af den tyrkiske videnskabsmand Yektan Turkyilmaz i Armenien
Subject: Arrest of the Turkish scholar Yektan Turkyilmaz in Armenia
Den 33-årige Yektan Turkyilmaz studerer til en Ph.D. i kulturantropologi ved Duke-universitet i North Carolina.
Yektan Turkyilmaz, aged 33, is studying for a Ph.D. in Cultural Anthropology at Duke University, North Carolina.
Turkyilmaz er ekspert i tyrkisk historie og navnlig Ottoman-rigets sene periode.
Mr Turkyilmaz is an expert in Turkish history, in particular the late period of the Ottoman Empire.
Af den grund fik han som den første tyrkiske videnskabsmand adgang til de armenske nationalarkiver.
For this reason, he was given permission to have access, as the first Turkish scholar, to the Armenian National Archives.
Den 17. juni, da Turkyilmaz netop skulle til at forlade Jerevan med fly, blev han med magt fjernet fra flyet og tilbageholdt.
On 17 June, as Mr. Turkyilmaz was about to fly out of Yerevan, he was forcibly removed from the aircraft and detained.
Da han checkede ind til flyvningen, medbragte han sit forskningsmateriale og de bøger, som han havde købt i antikvarboghandler og på gademarkedet i Jerevan.
When boarding his flight, he was carrying with him his research material and the books that he had bought in second-hand bookstores and the open-air market in Yerevan.
Turkyilmaz beskyldes for smugleri efter artikel 215, pkt. 2, i den armenske strafferet, og han risikerer at blive idømt mellem fire og otte års fængsel.
Mr Turkyilmaz has been charged with smuggling under the Article 215, paragraph 2 of the Armenian Criminal Code, and he faces a jail sentence of between 4 and 8 years.
Siden den 17. juni har Turkyilmaz været tilbageholdt i den nationale sikkerhedstjenestes hovedkvarter i Jerevan under store sikkerhedsforanstaltninger.
Since 17 June, Mr Turkyilmaz has been held in the National Security Service headquarters in Yerevan under high security conditions.
Turkyilmaz købte bøgerne lovligt i antikvarboghandler (hvilket boghandlerne har bekræftet) og havde ingen forestilling om, at han skulle have tilladelse til at tage disse bøger med sig ud af Armenien.
Mr Turkyilmaz bought the books legally from second-hand bookstores (as the testimonies of the booksellers' confirm) and did not imagine that he would need permission to take these books out of Armenia.
Han behandles i samme kategori som en smugler af atomvåben.
He is being treated in the same category as a nuclear weapons smuggler.
Er Rådet bekendt med Turkyilmaz' sag?
Is the Council aware of the case of Mr Turkyilmaz?
Har EU's repræsentation i Jerevan søgt om tilladelse til at besøge Turkyilmaz i fængslet?
Has the EU representative in Yerevan sought permission to visit Mr Turkyilmaz in prison?
Har Rådet formelt anmodet den armenske ambassadør om afklarende oplysninger i denne sag?
Has the Council formally requested clarification of this matter from the Armenian Ambassador?
Hvilke svar er der i bekræftende fald modtaget?
If so, what replies have been received?
Hvad vil Rådet gøre over for den armenske regering for at sikre, at de armenske myndigheder respekterer retten til en fair rettergang i denne sag?
What representations will the Council make to the Armenian Government so as to ensure that the right to a fair trial is respected by the Armenian authorities in this case?
Rådet er opmærksom på Yektan Turkyilmaz-sagen i Armenien og har bedt den armenske regering om oplysninger i den henseende.
The Council is aware of the case of Mr Yektan Turkyilmaz in Armenia and has sought information from the Government of Armenia regarding the case.
Yektan Turkyilmaz er dømt for at have overtrådt den armenske lov om eksport og import af kulturværdier fra 2004 og artikel 215 i den armenske straffelov i forbindelse med sit forsøg på at tage en række bøger af kulturel værdi med sig ud af Armenien.
The person in question was convicted with offences under the 2004 Armenian ‘Law on export and import of cultural goods’ and Article 215 of the Armenian Criminal Code relating to his attempt to take out of Armenia a number of books of cultural value.
Ifølge de oplysninger, Rådet har modtaget, begyndte retssagen den 9. august ved retten i Malatya-Sebastia-distriktet i Yerevans.
From the information received by the Council, the trial began on 9 August, at the court of the Malatya-Sebastia district of Yerevan.
Den 16. august fandt retten Yektan Turkyilmaz skyldig i bogsmugleri, men anklageren påpegede, at tiltalte havde samarbejdet under efterforskningen og indrømmet sin skyld, og anmodede derfor om en betinget dom.
On 16 August, the court found Mr Yektan Turkyilmaz guilty in smuggling of books, but the prosecutor pointed that he had cooperated with the investigation and has admitted is guilt and therefore requested a suspended sentence.
Yektan Turkyilmaz modtog en betinget dom og blev løsladt i retssalen.
The person in question has received a suspended sentence and was released in the courtroom.
På baggrund af oplysningerne fra den armenske regering har Rådet ingen grund til at tro, at retten til en retfærdig rettergang ikke er blevet respekteret i Yektan Turkyilmaz' tilfælde.
According to the information given by the Government of Armenia, the Council has no reason to think that the right to a fair trial has not been respected in the case of Mr Yektan Turkyilmaz.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3049/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3049/05
Er Kommissionen bekendt med Turkyilmaz' sag?
Is the Commission aware of the case of Mr Turkyilmaz?
Har Kommissionen formelt anmodet den armenske ambassadør om afklarende oplysninger i denne sag?
Has the Commission formally requested clarification of this matter from the Armenian Ambassador?
Hvad vil Kommissionen gøre over for den armenske regering for at sikre, at de armenske myndigheder respekterer retten til en fair rettergang i denne sag?
What representations will the Commission make to the Armenian Government so as to ensure that the right to a fair trial is respected by the Armenian authorities in this case?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3051/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3051/05
af Graham Booth (IND/DEM)
by Graham Booth (IND/DEM)
Om: Gibraltars landekode ved internationale samtaler
Subject: Gibraltar IDD Number
Rådets formandskab bedes sikre, at sagen om Gibraltars landekode (350), som har været henlagt i næsten et årti, løses hurtigst muligt.
Will the Council Presidency please ensure that the case of the Gibraltar IDD number (350), that has been allowed to be ignored for almost a decade, is resolved with alacrity?
Kan det oplyse, hvilke foranstaltninger der i øjeblikket træffes for at løse problemet?
Will it explain what measures are currently being taken to deal with this matter?
Vil det især orientere om begrundelserne for de beslutninger, der blev truffet i 2003 og 2004 om at henlægge de sager, som Gibtelecom og GNC havde indbragt for Kommissionen?
In particular, will it indicate the reasons for the decisions taken in 2003 and 2004 to drop the cases brought before the Commission by Gibtelecom and GNC?
Er det enig i, at spærring af en EU-medlemsstats landekode strider imod konkurrencepolitikken og enhver form for fairplay?
Does it agree that barring the IDD of a fellow EU nation contravenes competition policy and every notion of fair play?
Rådet anbefaler det ærede medlem at tage dette emne op over for Kommissionen.
The Council advises the Honourable Parliamentarian to raise this subject with the Commission.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3052/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3052/05
Om: Bestråling af levnedsmidler
Subject: Irradiation of foodstuffs
En række vælgere har rettet henvendelse vedrørende bestråling af levnedsmidler og er bekymrede over, at denne tendens er i vækst i EU.
Constituents have raised concerns with me about the irradiation of food and the possibility that this process is increasing in the European Union.
De frygter også, at det, såfremt bestrålede levnedsmidler indgår i andre færdigvarer, ikke nødvendigvis fremgår af mærkningen af disse produkter, at de indeholder bestrålede levnedsmidler.
They are also concerned that, if irradiated foodstuffs are used as ingredients in other finished food products, such products are not necessarily labelled as containing irradiated foodstuffs.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om udbredelsen af bestrålede levnedsmidler i EU er i vækst, og forsikre vælgerne om, at alle produkter, der indeholder bestrålede levnedsmidler, mærkes herefter?
Can the Commission indicate whether the irradiation of foodstuffs is indeed on the increase in the EU and assure my constituents that all products containing irradiated food ingredients are labelled as such?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3053/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3053/05
Om: Medarbejdere i budget- og finansenhederne i Kommissionens generaldirektorater
Subject: Staff of the budget and finance units of European Commission directorates-general
Hvor mange medarbejdere (tjenestemænd, hjælpeansatte, midlertidigt ansatte og kontraktansatte) arbejder i budget- og finansenhederne i Kommissionens generaldirektorater, og hvordan er de fordelt på de forskellige generaldirektorater?
How many staff (officials, auxiliary staff, temporary staff and contract staff) are working in the budget and finance units of Commission directorates-general and how are they allocated between the various directorates-general?
Hvordan har antallet af medarbejdere i de forskellige kategorier (tjenestemænd, midlertidigt ansatte, hjælpeansatte og kontraktansatte) i budget- og finansenhederne i Kommissionens generaldirektorater udviklet sig de seneste år?
What has been the trend in the number of staff in the various categories (officials, auxiliary staff, temporary staff and contract staff) in the budget and finance units of Commission directorates-general over recent years?
Hvor mange stillinger i budget- og finansenhederne i Kommissionens generaldirektorater er ledige, og hvad er antallet af ansøgninger?
How many posts in the budget and finance units of Commission directorates-general are vacant and what is the recruitment situation?
Er der sket en ændring i antallet af ansøgninger efter reformen af finansforordningen i 2002?
Has the recruitment situation improved since reform of the Financial Regulation in 2002?
Hvor lang tid tager det i almindelighed at besætte en ledig stilling i budget- og finansenhederne i Kommissionens generaldirektorater?
As a rule, how long does it take to fill a vacant post in the budget and finance units of Commission directorates-general?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3055/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3055/05
Om: European City Guides
Subject: European City Guides
Er Kommissionen enig i, at European City Guides' handelspraksis er urimelig som omhandlet i direktivet om urimelig handelspraksis?
Does the Commission agree that the commercial practices used by European City Guides are unfair within the meaning of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive?
Mener Kommissionen, at små virksomheder skal betragtes som forbrugere i denne forbindelse?
Does the Commission consider small businesses as consumers in this instance?
Er Kommissionen enig i, at bestemmelserne i direktivet om urimelig handelspraksis lige så vel finder anvendelse på små virksomheder som på individuelle forbrugere?
Does the Commission agree that the terms of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive are equally applicable to small businesses as to individual consumers?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3056/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3056/05
Er Kommissionen klar over, at visse britiske bilforsikringsselskaber begrænser forsikringsdækningen til kun at gælde i Det Forenede Kongerige, medmindre der kun tilbringes korte perioder i udlandet?
Is the Commission aware that some UK car insurance companies restrict insurance coverage to within the UK unless periods spent outside the UK are short periods only?
Hvis en borger ønsker at tilbringe længere tid i andre EU-lande (f.eks. seks måneder), nægter visse selskaber at forsikre bilen under sådanne længerevarende rejser, eller de kræver betydelig højere præmier.
If a citizen wishes to spend a longer period in other EU countries (e.g. six months), some companies either refuse to insure the car for such extended trips or charge significantly higher premiums.
Mener Kommissionen, at denne praksis er forenelig med principperne for det indre marked og med gældende EU-ret?
Does the Commission consider that this practice is compatible with single-market principles and with current EU law?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3057/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3057/05
(25. august 2005)
(25 August 2005)
Om: Fortsat ligegyldighed med hensyn til Darfur i Sudan
Subject: Darfur, Sudan: continued indifference