natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvad er Kommissionens kommentar til, at fem stærke udviklingslande – Kina, Indien, Brasilien, Mexico og Sydafrika – ikke har til hensigt at støtte forslaget fra medlemmer af G8 om at opfylde reduktionsmålene på 50 % af emissionen af kuldioxid i 2050?
What view does the Commission take of the fact that five powerful developing countries — China, India, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa intend to withhold support from the G8 recommendation to seek to achieve the 50 % reduction target for carbon dioxide gas emissions by 2050?
Anser Kommissionen det for realistisk at imødegå disse udviklingslandes modforslag om, at industrilandene reducerer deres emissioner med 80-90 % i forhold til 1990-niveauet?
Does it consider their counterproposal that the industrialised countries achieve an 80‑90 % reduction in emissions from 1990 levels to be realistic?
Hvordan stiller Kommissionen sig endvidere over for erklæringerne fra japanske embedsmænd, der ønsker, at emissionsreduktionerne indtil 2020 skal benytte det nuværende niveau som benchmark og ikke dem fra 1990, som vedtaget af EU's medlemsstater?
What view does it take of comments by Japanese officials to the effect that, in seeking to reduce emissions by 2020, current emission levels and not the 1990 levels (as agreed by the EU Member States) should be taken as the reference?
På baggrund af denne udvikling, hvor stor er da udsigten til at opnå en international aftale for tiden efter Kyoto?
In the view of these developments, how does it assess prospects for international agreement in the post-Kyoto period?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4160/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4160/08
Om: Ed Gallagher-rapporten
Subject: Ed Gallagher report
Hvad er Kommissionens reaktion på Gallagher-rapportens anbefalinger om, at vi reducerer indførelsesraten for biobrændstoffer?
What is the Commission’s response to the recommendations in the Gallagher report that we should reduce the rate of introduction of bio-fuel?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4161/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4161/08
Om: G8-topmødet i Japan
Subject: G8 Summit in Japan
Vil Kommissionen udtale sig om G8-topmødet i Japan?
Will the Commission make a statement on the G8 Summit Japan?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4162/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4162/08
Om: Anvendelse af kviksølv
Subject: Use of mercury
EU har besluttet at indskrænke brugen af kviksølv drastisk på grund af den store fare for den menneskelige sundhed og miljøet forbundet dermed.
The EU has decided to severely restrict the use of mercury because the metal is highly dangerous to human health and the environment.
Kommissionen har besluttet at behandle spørgsmålet om dentalamalgamer og henvende sig til SCENIHR-komitéen med henblik på at få evalueret eventuelle sundhedsrisici forbundet med dentalamalgam.
The Commission, however, took the decision to deal separately with dental amalgams and ask the SCENIHR committee to assess the potential health risks of mercury amalgam.
SCENIHR-komitéens rapport er udarbejdet af fire interne eksperter (SCNENIHR- og CENIHR-komitéen) samt af fire europæiske repræsentanter fra tandplejeerhvervet, der er for brugen af amalgam.
The SCENIHR report was drawn up by four ‘house’ experts (SCENIHR and SCHER committees) and four representatives of the European dental profession, who were in favour of amalgam.
Ud af 190 citerede publikationer, stammer 90 fra tandlægetidsskrifter.
Out of the 190 published articles quoted in the report, 90 are taken from dental journals.
Ud af de mange publikationer, der undersøger sammenhængen mellem dentalamalgam og Alzheimers sygdom, er kun en lille undersøgelse udført af tandlæger citeret — Sachsenundersøgelsen.
Among the voluminous body of published literature exploring the link between mercury in dental amalgam and Alzheimer’s disease, only one study is quoted, the small-scale Saxe study produced by dentists.
Hvordan er denne bibliografi, der fremkommer så ensidig, blevet valgt?
What method was used to compile this bibliography, which likewise appears to be one-sided?
Hvorfor har Kommissionen besluttet at behandle sagen om dentalamalgam separat?
Why did the Commission decide to treat mercury amalgam as a case apart?
Vil de europæiske borgeres mund være det sidste sted, man kan gemme kviksølv, der ellers skal fjernes fra alle andre anvendelser?
Will the mouths of European citizens be the last place where mercury may be stored once all its other uses — as is due to happen — have been abolished?
Kræver etikken ikke, at en videnskabelig eksperterklæring udføres uafhængigt af kompetente eksperter?
Do not ethical requirements imply that a scientific assessment should be conducted in complete independence by qualified experts?
Hvorfor er ingen epidemiolog, toksikolog, immunolog, endokrinolog eller toksiko-kemiker specialiseret inden for kviksølvstoksicitet blevet adspurgt?
Why was it that no epidemiologist, toxicologist, immunologist, endocrinologist, or chemical toxicology expert specialising in the toxicity of mercury was called upon to take part?
I betragtning af hvor meget der står på spil inden for den offentlige sundhed og de europæiske borgeres berettigede forventninger om sundhedsmæssigt demokrati, kan Kommissionen da nedsætte en ny gruppe eksperter, bestående af kompetente videnskabsfolk, som er uafhængige af tandlægemiljøet, og som respekterer alle de gældende etiske regler (kompetencer, uafhængighed og kontradiktorisk ekspertise)?
Given the vast public health issues at stake and the legitimate expectations of European citizens regarding democracy as applied to health, could the Commission set up a new expert working party in which, competent scientists, free from the influence of dental circles, would comply in every respect with the ethical rules in force (expertise, independence, and analysis and counter-analysis)?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4163/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4163/08
Om: Eksperterklæring om kviksølv
Subject: Expert report on mercury
Inden for rammerne af »Fællesskabsstrategien for kviksølv«, har Europa-Parlamentets Udvalg om Miljø, Folkesundhed og Fødevaresikkerhed opfordret Kommissionen (marts 2006) til at begrænse brugen af dentalamalgam af sundhedsmæssige årsager.
In March 2006, in connection with the ‘Community strategy concerning mercury’ the EP’s Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety called on the Commission, for health reasons, to restrict the use of mercury in dental amalgams.
Faktisk er dentalamalgam europæernes største eksponeringskilde over for kviksølv, et metal, der er klassificeret af EU blandt de kræftfremkaldende, mutagene eller reproduktionstoksiske stoffer (CMR-stoffer), som inden for kort tid vil blive forbudt i EU.
Mercury in this form accounts, as far as Europeans are concerned, for the largest proportion of exposure; mercury as such is a metal that the EU ranks among the dreaded CMR substances (i.e. those classed as carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic to reproduction), whose use in the EU is shortly due to be banned.
Alligevel konkluderes det i SCENIHR's rapport om risici forbundet med brugen af dentalamalgam, at stoffet er sikkert at anvende.
SCENIHR, however, which was asked to report on the risks associated with mercury in dental amalgams, has concluded that the metal is harmless.
Den officielle svenske eksperterklæring (»Mercury in dental-filling materials — an updated risk analysis in environmental medical terms«, 2003) om risici forbundet med brug af dentalamalgam, udført af verdens bedste specialister inden for kviksølvstoksicitet, danner referenceramme.
The official Swedish assessment (‘Mercury in dental-filling materials — an updated risk analysis in environmental medical terms’, 2003) of the risks posed by mercury in dental amalgams, carried out by the world’s most eminent mercury toxicity specialists, constitutes a benchmark.
Eksperterklæringen konkluderer, at man af medicinske årsager bør afskaffe amalgam fra tandplejen så hurtigt som muligt.
In its findings it states that, for medical reasons, amalgam should be banished from dental treatment as soon as possible.
Hvorfor har SCENIHR ignoreret denne rapport?
For what strange reason did SCENIHR ignore this report?
FDA har netop erkendt faren ved dentalamalgam for hjernens udvikling hos fostre og børn.
The FDA has recently established that mercury amalgam poses a danger to developing foetal and infant brains.
Norge forbød amalgam sidste januar, i Danmark gøres der klar til det samme og i Sverige standsede man godtgørelsen af omkostninger dertil i 1998.
Norway banned amalgams in January of this year, and Denmark is preparing to follow suit; in Sweden, the cost of amalgam fillings has not been refundable since 1998.
Hvordan kan Kommissionen retfærdiggøre en sådan benægtelse af risici forbundet med kviksølv i en rapport, der i så ringe grad tager højde for den aktuelle videnskabelige viden?
How can the Commission justify the refusal to recognise the risks associated with mercury, an attitude made manifest by the publication of a report that has paid such scant heed to present-day scientific knowledge?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4164/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4164/08
af Bastiaan Belder (IND/DEM)
by Bastiaan Belder (IND/DEM)
Om: Intimidering og indskrænkning af frihed for (ikke)registrerede kristne og kirkeledere i Kina
Subject: Intimidation and restricting the freedom of (un)registered Christians and church leaders in China
I juni 2008 offentliggjorde Christian Solidarity Worldwide og China Aid en rapport med titlen »China.
In June 2008 Christian Solidarity Worldwide and China Aid published a report entitled ‘China.
Persecution of Protestant Christians in the Approach to the Beijing Olympic Games« (Kina.
Persecution of Protestant Christians in the Approach to the Beijing Olympic Games’.
De ikkestatslige organisationer gjorde opmærksom på de alvorlige indskrænkninger for kristne fra den registrerede Treenighedskirke og den klare forfølgelse af kristne, som har sluttet sig sammen i ikkeregistrerede huskirker.
The NGOs drew attention to serious restrictions on Christians from the registered Trinity Church and to clear persecution of Christians who have joined unregistered house churches.
De ikkestatslige organisationer underbygger deres påstand om, at religionsfriheden er blevet krænket af den kinesiske regering, med en række eksempler, der strækker sig fra Peking til det fjerntliggende Xinjiang.
The NGOs support their claim that freedom of religion has been violated by the Chinese Government with a number of examples, stretching from Peking to the distant Xinjiang.
På baggrund af denne chokerende rapport fra Christian Solidarity Worldwide og China Aid forsøgte jeg at mødes med adskillige førende repræsentanter for huskirkerne i Peking onsdag den 18. juni 2008.
In the light of this shocking report by Christian Solidarity Worldwide and China Aid, I attempted to meet several leading representatives of the house churches in Peking on Wednesday 18 June 2008.
Den kinesiske sikkerhedstjenestes arrestationer og intimidering forhindrede brutalt enhver personlig kontakt med disse ærlige kinesiske borgere.
Arrests and intimidation by the Chinese security service brutally prevented any personal contact with these honest Chinese citizens.
Rådet bedes besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
Would the Council state: 1.
Har Rådet noteret sig rapporten med titlen »China.
Has the Council taken note of the report entitled ‘China.
Persecution of Protestant Christians in the Approach to the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games« af Christian Solidarity Worldwide og China Aid, og i bekræftende fald, vil det henvende sig til de kinesiske myndigheder i denne forbindelse? 2.
Persecution of Protestant Christians in the Approach to the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games’ by Christian Solidarity Worldwide and China Aid, and if so, will it be making representations to the Chinese authorities as a result? 2.
Har Rådet kendskab til arrestationen af pastor Zhang Mingxuan og dennes tolk Ou Yong i Peking den 18. juni 2008, og i bekræftende fald, har det kendskab til noget officielt svar fra Peking vedrørende årsagerne til disse arrestationer? 3.
Is the Council aware of the arrest of the Reverend Zhang Mingxuan and his interpreter Ou Yong in Peking on 18 June 2008, and if so, of what official response from Peking is it aware as to the reasons for these arrests? 3.
Ovennævnte pastor Zhang Mingxuan trues af hjemløshed som følge af en regeringsbeslutning, der gør det ulovligt for ejere at indgå lejekontrakter med medlemmer af såkaldte huskirker.
The above pastor Zhang Mingxuan is threatened with homelessness as a result of a government decision that makes it a criminal offence for landlords to enter into leases with members of so-called house churches.
Anser Rådet dette for at være en overtrædelse af de grundlæggende rettigheder, og i bekræftende fald, hvilke foranstaltninger agter det at træffe over for de kinesiske myndigheder? 4.
Does the Council consider this to be a violation of fundamental rights, and if so, what action is it planning to take in relation to the Chinese authorities? 4.
Hvordan vil Rådet medvirke til at forbedre religionsfriheden i Kina, som når det kommer til stykket er en af dens vigtigste partnere?
More specifically, how will it be helping to improve freedom of religion in China, which after all is one of its most important partners?
Rådet har noteret sig rapporten fra Christian Solidarity Worldwide og China Aid med titlen »China: Persecution of Protestant Christians in the Approach to the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games« (Kina: Forfølgelse af protestantiske kristne op til De Olympiske Lege i Beijing).
The Council has taken note of the Christian Solidarity Worldwide and China Aid report entitled ‘China: Persecution of Protestant Christians in the Approach to the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games’.
Religionsfrihed er et af de centrale spørgsmål, der systematisk er blevet rejst i forbindelse med menneskerettighedsdialogen mellem EU og Kina, og EU har til hensigt at drøfte spørgsmålet på den kommende dialogrunde i efteråret 2008.
Freedom of religious belief is one of the core issues that have been systematically raised at the EU‑China human rights dialogue and the EU side intends to discuss this issue during the forthcoming dialogue round in late autumn 2008.
En række af de enkeltsager, der optræder i nævnte rapport, er desuden for nylig blevet forelagt de kinesiske myndigheder via diplomatiske kanaler.
In addition, a number of the individual cases that feature in the abovementioned report have recently been brought to the attention of the Chinese authorities through diplomatic channels.
Rådets fulgte nøje hændelsen den 18. juni, hvor pastor Zhang Mingxuan og hans tolk Ou Yong blev arresteret i Beijing, i tæt samarbejde med Europa-Kommissionens delegation i Beijing.
The Council closely followed the 18 June incident involving the arrest of Reverend Zhang Mingxuan and his interpreter Ou Yong in Beijing, in close coordination with the Delegation of the European Commission in Beijing.
Både pastoren og hans tolk blev løsladt fra varetægtsfængslet den 19. juni 2008 efter pres og indsigelser fra det internationale samfund.
Both the Pastor and his interpreter were released from custody on 19 June 2008 following pressure and representations by the international community.
Den officielle forklaring var, at pastoren blev tilbageholdt med henblik på afhøring.
The official explanation was that the Pastor was held for questioning.
Rådet deler det ærede medlems bekymringer over pastor Zhangs situation og vil fortsætte med at rejse pastor Zhangs sag og andre tilsvarende sager over for de kinesiske myndigheder.
The Council shares the concern expressed by the Honourable Member regarding the situation of Reverend Zhang and will continue to raise the case of Pastor Zhang and other similar cases with the Chinese authorities.
EU fremmer aktivt respekten for religions- og trosfrihed, som den betragter som en integrerende del af sin menneskerettighedspolitik, og vil også fremover være aktiv i multilaterale fora og i sine bilaterale forbindelser med Kina gennem både diplomatiske repræsentationer og i forbindelse med sin menneskerettighedsdialog.
The EU actively promotes respect for freedom of religion or belief as an integral part of its human rights policy and will continue to take action in multilateral fora as well as in its bilateral relations with China, both through diplomatic representations and in the context of its human rights dialogue.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4165/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4165/08
Har Kommissionen noteret sig rapporten med titlen »China.
Has the Commission taken note of the report entitled ‘China.
Persecution of Protestant Christians in the Approach to the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games« af Christian Solidarity Worldwide og China Aid, og i bekræftende fald, vil den henvende sig til de kinesiske myndigheder i denne forbindelse? 2.
Persecution of Protestant Christians in the Approach to the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games’ by Christian Solidarity Worldwide and China Aid, and if so, will it be making representations to the Chinese authorities as a result? 2.
Har Kommissionen kendskab til arrestationen af pastor Zhang Mingxuan og dennes tolk Ou Yong i Peking den 18. juni 2008, og i bekræftende fald, har den kendskab til noget officielt svar fra Peking vedrørende årsagerne til disse arrestationer? 3.
Is the Commission aware of the arrest of the Reverend Zhang Mingxuan and his interpreter Ou Yong in Peking on 18 June 2008, and if so, of what official response from Peking is it aware as to the reasons for these arrests? 3.
Anser Kommissionen dette for at være en overtrædelse af de grundlæggende rettigheder, og i bekræftende fald, hvilke foranstaltninger agter den at træffe over for de kinesiske myndigheder? 4.
Does the Commission consider this to be a violation of fundamental rights, and if so, what action is it planning to take in relation to the Chinese authorities? 4.
Hvordan vil Kommissionen medvirke til at forbedre religionsfriheden i Kina, som når det kommer til stykket er en af dens vigtigste partnere?
More specifically, how will it be helping to improve freedom of religion in China, which after all is one of its most important partners?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4166/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4166/08
af Daniel Dăianu (ALDE)
by Daniel Dăianu (ALDE)
Om: Inddragelsen af nye verdensmagter i styringen af globale problemer
Subject: Involvement of emerging world powers in dealing with international problems
Jeg glæder mig over det franske formandskabs hensigt om at inddrage disse nye verdensmagter i forskellige fora, herunder gennem en udvidelse af G8-gruppen.
The projected measures by the French Presidency to involve these powers in various ways, including enlargement of the G8 group, are to be welcomed.
Foreligger der en konkret handlingsplan for at nå dette mål, som har mulighed for at blive videreført af de kommende formandskaber?
Has a specific programme of measures up to this end been drawn which has some prospect of being followed up by successive presidencies?
De internationale institutioner ændrer konstant struktur for at afspejle den globale økonomiske og politiske udvikling samt tackle nye politiske udfordringer.
The structure of international institutions is constantly evolving to reflect global economic and political developments, as well as to meet new policy challenges.
Oprettelsen af G20 i 1999, som omfatter nye verdensmagter (f.eks. Brasilien, Kina, Indien osv.), for at styrke den globale økonomiske dialog og den nylige revision af IMF's struktur og medlemslandenes stemmevægte og indledningen i 2007 af Heiligendamm-processen, inden for hvis rammer G8-landene udveksler idéer med de store nye vækstøkonomier Kina, Indien, Brasilien, Mexico og Sydafrika om relevante verdensomspændende økonomiske emner, bl.a. investeringsbetingelser, innovation, energi og udviklingssamarbejde, er tydelige tegn på denne løbende proces, der vil fortsætte i alle relevante fora.
The creation of a G20 in 1999, which includes emerging world powers (e.g. Brazil, China, India, etc.), to enhance the global economic dialogue and the recent review of the structure and voting weights of the member countries of the IMF, and the initiation last year of the ‘Heiligendamm process’, within which the G8 countries exchange ideas with the large emerging economies China, India, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa on relevant, global economic topics such as investment conditions, innovation, energy and development cooperation, are clear indications of this ongoing process, which will continue to be pursued in all appropriate fora.
Hvad angår nye verdensmagters deltagelse i det multilaterale handelssystem, er det vigtigt at påpege, at de fleste af de såkaldte nye vækstøkonomier, f.eks. Kina, Indien og Brasilien, er medlemmer af WTO, og at omkring to tredjedele af WTO's 153 medlemmer er udviklingslande.
As regards the involvement of emerging world powers in the multilateral trade system, it is important to point out that most of the so-called emerging economies e.g. China, India and Brazil, are members of the WTO, and about two thirds of the WTO’s 153 members are developing countries.
Det er også vigtigt at huske, at alle store WTO-beslutninger træffes af samtlige medlemmer.
Moreover, it is also important to bear in mind that all major WTO decisions are taken by the membership as a whole.
Denne arbejdsmetode giver alle medlemmer mulighed for at sikre, at der tages behørigt hensyn til deres interesser, og sikrer, at alle WTO's medlemmer, herunder de nye verdensmagter, deltager i den globale beslutningsproces.
This working method allows all members to ensure their interests are properly considered and ensures the involvement of all WTO members, including emerging world powers, in the global decision-making process.
I oktober 2006 udsendte Kommissionen en meddelelse med titlen »Det globale Europa« — I konkurrencen på verdensmarkedet KOM(2006)0567. .
In October 2006, the Commission issued the communication entitled ‘Global Europe: Competing in the World’ COM(2006)567. .
Denne meddelelse behandler de seneste ændringer som følge af den nuværende globalisering af markederne og kommer med forslag til, hvordan EU kan reagere på denne proces gennem handelspolitikken og sammenkæde de eksterne politikker med EU's bredere dagsorden for konkurrenceevne, som den kommer til udtryk i Lissabonstrategien for vækst og beskæftigelse.
This communication deals with the recent changes due to the current globalisation of the markets, and suggests how the EU could respond to this process as regards trade policy linking external policies to the EU's broader competitiveness agenda, as presented in the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs.
Rådet har ikke drøftet spørgsmålet om et eventuelt specifikt program med foranstaltninger, der skal involvere de nye verdensmagter på forskellige måder, herunder udvidelse af G8-gruppen.
The question of the possible existence of a specific programme of measures to involve emerging world powers in various ways, including the enlargement of the G8 group, has not been discussed by the Council.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-4167/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4167/08
af Rareş-Lucian Niculescu (PPE-DE) , Marian Zlotea (PPE-DE) og Flaviu Călin Rus (PPE-DE)
by Rareş-Lucian Niculescu (PPE-DE) , Marian Zlotea (PPE-DE) and Flaviu Călin Rus (PPE-DE)
Om: Tilskyndelse og fremme af politisamarbejdet mellem EU's medlemsstater
Subject: Measures to encourage and promote police cooperation between EU Member States
Den offentlige mening i EU-medlemsstaterne har i den seneste tid været koncentreret om de italienske myndigheders lovindgreb med henblik på at håndtere nødsituationer forårsaget af bosættelser af personer uden fast bopæl i områder af regionerne Napoli, Rom og Milano.
Recently public attention in the EU Member States has been drawn to the adoption of legislation in Italy seeking to deal with emergency situations caused by nomad encampments in the areas of Naples, Rome and Milan.
De italienske myndigheder har begrundet sådanne foranstaltninger med, at de tager sigte på at bekæmpe kriminalitet.
The Italian authorities have justified these measures by indicating that they are intended to combat crime.