natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Efter beslutningen og i henhold til denne offentliggjorte prioritering blev de portugisiske landmænd af landbrugsministeriet underrettet om, at det, i betragtning af budgetstillingen i 2005, blev konstateret, at der ikke var midler på budgettet til at kunne godkende ansøgningerne til foranstaltninger, der ikke har været omfattet af forpligtelser forud for 2005.
Following this decision, Portuguese were informed by the Ministry of Agriculture, in accordance with this scale of priorities, that ‘in view of the budgetary situation in 2005, it was noted that there were no budgetary resources available to consider approving applications for measures that had not been the subject of agreements prior to 2005’ Letter AGR002/2006/0074090 from IFADAP. .
Kommissionen bedes derfor besvare følgende spørgsmål: 1.
The Commission is asked to answer the following: 1.
Har Kommissionen kendskab til disse kontraktlige forbindelser og betalinger?
Is it aware of these contractual relations and these payments?
Hvis ovennævnte bekræftes, hvilke kommentarer har Kommissionen da hertil? 2.
If so, what are its views on his situation? 2.
Hvordan vil Kommissionen betegne regeringens holdning om at tildele støtte til denne virksomhedsgruppe, hvorved tusindvis af landmænd diskrimineres?
How does it view the Portuguese Government's decision to grant aid to this business group, thereby discriminating against thousands of farmers?
Hvorledes vurderer Kommissionen det faktum, at der betales støtte, der er blevet betegnet som »ikkeprioriteret«, til en producent, som staten forpagter til, hvilket medfører direkte eller indirekte fordele for ministeriet selv?
How does it view the fact that aid is being paid that was declared to be ‘non-priority aid’ to a producer who is a leaseholder of State property, thus resulting in to direct or indirect gains for the Ministry itself?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-6483/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-6483/08
Om: De græske bankers misbrug
Subject: Abuses by Greek banks
De græske banker opfinder nye, ulovlige og overdrevne fremgangsmåder til skade for borgerne, de forretningsdrivende og SMV'erne (f.eks. rentestigning på kreditkort og trusler om indfrielse af hele gælden, hvis kunderne ikke accepterer rentestigningen) midt i den måske værste globale finanskrise siden krigen.
In the midst of perhaps the worst post-war worldwide economic crisis, the Greek banks have invented new, illegal and abusive practices to the detriment of citizens, business people and SMEs (such as the rise in interest rates on credit cards and clients being forced to pay the whole amount owing if they do not accept the increased interest rate).
Samtidigt med at de udviser en enestående social ufølsomhed, negligerer de ikke blot de inappellable domstolskendelser, som de er blevet idømt på grund af deres overdrevne vilkår, men de forsøger i realiteten at vælte likviditetsproblemerne over på forbrugerne.
The Greek banks are showing an unprecedented lack of social conscience, not only by failing to comply with the final court judgments condemning them for abusive practices, but by attempting to devolve the problems of market liquidity, essentially onto consumption.
Der er tale om en modstridende og tydeligt asocial fremgangsmåde, hvilket der også er givet udtryk for i Kommissionens nylige rapport.
This is a contradictory and openly antisocial tactic which recent research by the Commission has also identified.
Ifølge rapportens oplysninger er de græske bankers debetsummer de højeste i euroområdet, og deres fremgangsmåder lægger hindringer i vejen for detailbankmarkedets konkurrenceevne.
According to the research findings, the debts of Greek banks are the highest in the eurozone and their practices are hindering competition in the retail banking market.
Hvilke tiltag agter Kommissionen at iværksætte for at få den græske stat, Grækenlands nationalbank (Trapeza tis Ellados) og konkurrencerådet til at gribe ind?
What action does the Commission intend to take to mobilise the Greek Government, the Bank of Greece and the Competition Commission?
På hvilken måde er den græske stat »nødsaget« til at gribe effektivt ind til fordel for bankkunderne ved at træffe foranstaltninger, der kan sætte en stopper for den ublu opførsel, der udvises?
How will the Greek State be ‘compelled’ to intervene decisively in the interest of clients of banking establishments, imposing measures which will put a stop to the prevailing irresponsibility in this sector?
Overholder de europæiske banker principperne for deres selskabers sociale ansvar?
Do the European banks observe the principles of the social responsibility of enterprises?
I bekræftende fald, hvordan er det så ifølge Kommissionens anskuelse muligt, at de andre europæiske banker overholder principperne for deres selskabers sociale ansvar, mens de græske ikke gør det, selv om den negative økonomiske situation rammer næsten alle EU's økonomier?
If so why, in the Commission’s opinion, is it possible for other European banks to observe these principles and not the Greek banks, also considering the difficult economic conditions that are affecting almost all of the EU economies?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-6486/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-6486/08
(3. december 2008)
(3 December 2008)
Om: Trusler og indblanding fra internationale sportsforbund i forbindelse med medlemsstaternes gennemførelsesforanstaltninger
Subject: Threats and interference by international sports federations in Member States' legal systems
Forbundet »Féderation Internationale de Football Association« (FIFA) har de seneste måneder beskyldt nogle medlemsstaters regeringer for »indblanding« i forhold til deres sportsforbund.
The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) has, in recent months, condemned as ‘interference’ certain actions taken by governments in some Member States concerning their sports federations.
I Polens tilfælde har FIFA truet med inhabilitet i forbindelse med landets nationale udvælgelse og anfægter udvælgelsen til VM i Sydafrika samt organiseringen af EM i 2012, hvor Polen deler værtskabet med Ukraine.
In the Polish case, FIFA has gone so far as to threaten the Polish national team with disqualification from the qualifying rounds of the South Africa World Cup and with being barred from organising Euro 2012, which it is hosting with the Ukraine.
I Spaniens tilfælde truede FIFA-præsident Joseph Blatter på et officielt møde i Madrid den 17. februar 2008 med ikke at tillade udvælgelsen samt hindre spanske klubber i at spille internationale kampe, »hvis den spanske regering gennem Consejo superior de deportes fortsat blander sig i spørgsmål vedrørende fodbold«.
In the Spanish case, FIFA's President, Joseph Blatter, threatened, during a public event held in Madrid on 17 February 2008, to bar the Spanish national team and Spanish clubs from playing in international competitions ‘if the Spanish Government, through their Sports Council (CSD), continue to interfere in footballing affairs’.
Disse trusler blev ledsaget af andre kommentarer, såsom »det bliver hårdt, men det vil kun tage mig seks timer at samle og høre FIFA's hasteudvalg og træffe beslutning om at udelukke Spanien.
These threats were accompanied by other comments such as, ‘it would be tough, but it would only take six hours to call a FIFA emergency meeting to hear and decide upon Spain's exclusion.
Under hensyntagen til EU-traktatens artikel 6 og EF-traktatens artikel 149 som ændret ved Lissabontraktaten, samt at Kommissionen i Helsingforsrapporten har understreget behovet for et forbund mellem de styrende organer inden for fodbold og de offentlige myndigheder, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende:
Bearing in mind Article 6 of the EU Treaty and Article 149 of the EC Treaty as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon, and in view of the fact that the Commission has underlined in the Helsinki Report the need for a partnership between football's governing bodies and public authorities, can the Commission answer the following questions:
Mener Kommissionen, at FIFA er eneste og øverste myndighed vedrørende bestemmelser for fodbold, også hvis forbundets beslutninger er i modstrid med medlemsstaternes bestemmelser?
Does the Commission consider FIFA to be the sole and supreme authority concerning football governance, even if its rules contradict legislation in the Member States?
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at sportsforbundene ikke er underlagt medlemsstaternes lovgivning og dermed heller ikke omfattet af fællesskabsretten?
Will the Commission confirm that the sports federations are not subject to Member State legislation and, as a result, neither are they subject to Community law?
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe for at undgå, at sportsforbundene overlapper medlemsstaternes legitime myndighed?
What measures does the Commission intend to adopt to prevent sports organisations placing themselves above the legitimate authority of Member States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-6487/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-6487/08
Om: De rumænske myndigheders overholdelse af bestemmelserne i direktiv 89/665/ΕØF og direktiv 2004/18/ΕF under indgåelsen af offentlige kontrakter
Subject: Compliance by the Romanian authorities with Directive 89/665/EEC and Directive 2004/18/EC in respect of public procurement
Der er allerede indgivet en klage til Kommissionen angående licitationen af opførelsen af motorvejen Cernavoda-Medgidia, som de rumænske myndigheder har udskrevet, og som bl.a. et græsk firma deltog i.
A complaint has already been lodged with the Commission concerning an invitation to tender issued by the Romanian authorities for the construction of the Cernavoda-Medgidia motorway, in response to which one of the tenders was submitted by a Greek company.
På grundlag af ovennævnte bedes Kommissionen oplyse følgende: —
In this connection, can the Commission provide the following information: —
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-6488/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-6488/08
Om: Sundhedsafgift i Irland
Subject: Health levy in Ireland
Kommissionen bedes præcisere, om den er klar over, at den irske regering har fremsat forslag om en ny sundhedsafgift, og bedes endvidere præcisere sin holdning til lovligheden af en sådan afgift.
Could the Commission clarify if it is aware of the new health levy proposed by the Irish Government, and what is its position regarding the legality of this levy?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-6489/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-6489/08
Om: Krænkelse af de grundlæggende menneskerettigheder
Subject: Denial of fundamental human rights
En italiensk statsborger, Francesco Cavallaro, døde alt for tidligt af naturlige årsager den 10. april 2005 i Mönchengladbach, Tyskland, hvor han havde boet alene i mange år.
Francesco Cavallaro, an Italian citizen, died prematurely on 10 April 2005, of natural causes, in the city of Mönchengladbach, Germany, where he had been living, on his own, for many years.
Efter dødsfaldet undlod det italienske konsulat og udenrigsministeriet i Berlin ikke kun at informere familien (forældrene og søstrene bor i byen Paternò på Sicilien), men de sørgede ligefrem for at kremere liget i modsætning til afdødes udtrykkelige vilje og uden familiens godkendelse.
Following his death, the Italian consular authorities and the German Minister of Foreign Affairs not only considered it unnecessary to notify Mr Cavallaro’s relatives (his parents and sisters live in Paternò, Sicily), but even cremated his body, although this was not the deceased’s express prior wish and without any authorisation from his relatives.
Det var kun ved et tilfælde, at Francesco Cavallaros familie efter lang tid fik kendskab til dødsfaldet, men da de kontaktede de tyske myndigheder, fik de ingen forklaring på forholdene omkring dødsfaldet, hvem der havde foretaget en identifikation af liget, hvor de personlige ejendele var blevet af, og hvor urnen, som var blevet opbevaret et sted uden mulighed for identificering, befandt sig.
Only by chance, and long afterwards, did Mr Cavallaro’s relations learn that he had passed away but, on contacting the German authorities, were given no explanation as to the circumstances of his death, as to who had identified the body or as to the whereabouts of his personal belongings or the urn containing his ashes, which they were told was being kept in an unidentifiable location.
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at de italienske og de tyske myndigheders fremgangsmåde er i åbenlys strid med de grundlæggende menneskerettigheder, der er nedfældet i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union, og i strid med ethvert grundlæggende etisk og moralsk princip og derfor bør være genstand for kritik fra EU's institutioner?
Does the Commission not consider the conduct of the Italian and German authorities to be manifestly inconsistent with the protection of human rights enshrined in the European Treaty and contrary to every fundamental moral and ethical principle, and that it should therefore be censured by the Community institutions?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-6490/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-6490/08
af Krzysztof Hołowczyc (PPE-DE)
by Krzysztof Hołowczyc (PPE‑DE)
Om: Indførelse af i2010-programmet i forbindelse med den globale økonomiske krise
Subject: Implementation of the i2010 programme in a period of global economic crisis
EU's økonomi står over for en global økonomisk krise.
The global economic crisis is affecting the economic health of the European Union.
Den europæiske økonomis forskellige områder mærker de smertefulde konsekvenser.
The painful consequences of that crisis are being felt in various branches of the European economy.
Bilindustrien er et af de mest berørte områder.
One of the most seriously affected sectors is the car industry.
Den private sektors investeringskraft er markant nedsat, hvilket også medfører færre penge til indførelse af nye teknologier i både den private og offentlige sektor.
Private sector investment capacity has fallen sharply, resulting in a reduction in spending on new technologies in both the private and public sectors.
Det er en naturlig reaktion, at deltagerne på EU's indre marked søger at skabe besparelser.
Companies operating in the internal market are clearly seeking economies.
Man kan frygte, at de nuværende betingelser kan forårsage, at medlemsstaterne langsommere indfører de initiativer, der er vedtaget på institutionsplan.
It is feared that current conditions could hold back implementation of initiatives taken by the Member States at institutional level.
Indførelsen af i2010-programmet indeholdt i følgende meddelelser fra Kommissionen: —
Implementation of the i2010 programme set out in the Commission communications: —
»Øget kendskab til ikt's betydning for mere intelligente, sikrere og renere køretøjer« (KOM(2006)0059) (initiativet »intelligente biler«), —
‘Raising Awareness of ICT for Smarter, Safer and Cleaner Vehicles’ (COM(2006)0059) (‘Intelligent Car Initiative’), —
»eCall tilbage på rette spor — en handlingsplan (tredje meddelelse om e-sikkerhed)« (KOM(2006)0723), —
‘Bringing eCall Back on Track — Action Plan (3rd eSafety Communication)’ (COM(2006)0723), —
»En energipolitik for Europa« (KOM(2007)0001), —
‘An Energy Policy for Europe’ (COM(2007)0001), —
»i2010 — Årsrapport om informationssamfundet, 2007« (KOM(2007)0146),
‘i2010 — Annual Information Society Report 2007’ (COM(2007)0146),
i hele Fællesskabet har til formål at mindske udgifterne til redning af trafikofre, problemer forbundet med kødannelse på vejene, forurening af miljøet og den forværrede offentlige sundhed.
should help to reduce spending, throughout the Community, on rescuing traffic accident victims, problems associated with overcrowded roads, environmental pollution and the worsening state of public health.
Disponerer Kommissionen over data om den aktuelle status for indførelsen af de forskellige dele af i2010-programmet i medlemsstaterne, især eCall, ESC, IKT og ITS?
Does the Commission have any details on the progress made in implementing the various elements of the i2010 programme in the Member States, in particular the eCall, ESC, TIC and ITS systems?
Hvilke medlemsstater er ikke helt klar til at kunne indføre pakkeløsningen inden den planlagte frist i 2010?
Which Member States are not fully ready to implement the package by 2010 as planned?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-6491/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-6491/08
Om: Børn, som er blevet forladt af forældre, der har taget arbejde i udlandet
Subject: Situation of children left behind when their parents go abroad to work
Børn, som bliver forladt af deres forældre, fordi disse har taget arbejde i udlandet, bliver et mere og mere udbredt fænomen i Central- og Vesteuropa.
It is becoming an increasingly frequent phenomenon in central and eastern Europe for children to be left behind when their parents go abroad to work.
Ifølge UNICEF's seneste undersøgelse fra 2007 er omkring 350 000 rumænske børn blevet efterladt alene i deres hjem, efter at deres forældre er rejst til Italien eller Spanien for at arbejde.
The most recent Unicef study carried out in 2007 found that around 350 000 children in Romania had been left at home on their own after their parents had left to work in Italy or Spain.
Dette sociale problem får betydning for hele Fællesskabet, idet den frie bevægelighed for personer inden for EU, der ud fra et kulturelt og økonomisk synspunkt har mange fordele, undergraver familier i mange medlemsstater og fremmer mentale problemer samt adfærdsvanskeligheder hos børn, der er blevet efterladt under opsyn af bedsteforældre eller naboer og frataget deres forældres omsorg.
This social problem takes on a Community dimension in the light of the free movement of people within the European Union which, even though it offers numerous advantages from the economic and cultural point of view, undermines the integrity of families in many Member States and leads to the emergence of psychological and behavioural problems among children who are left in the care of their grandparents or neighbours and are thus deprived of parental affection.
Endvidere har disse børn, idet de er uden deres forældres opsyn, en større risiko for at blive ofre for menneskehandel, udnyttelse og seksuelle overgreb.
Furthermore, children left without parental supervision are exposed to an increased risk of becoming victims of trafficking in human beings, exploitation and sexual abuse.
Kan Kommissionen i denne forbindelse oplyse, om den allerede har indledt en dialog med medlemsstaternes nationale myndigheder vedrørende foranstaltninger, der tager sigte på at forebygge, at disse familier går i opløsning, og på at gøre forældrene opmærksomme på de negative indvirkninger, det kan have på deres børns psykologiske adfærd, når de rejser til udlandet og efterlader dem?
In this context, can the Commission say whether it has already entered into a dialogue with the national authorities in the Member States regarding measures to prevent the dissolution of families and provide information to parents concerning the negative effects of their departure on their children's psychological well-being?
Agter Kommissionen desuden at gribe ind for, sammen med medlemsstaterne, at udarbejde et sæt regler for god praksis for indsamling af data angående antallet af forældre, der har taget arbejde i udlandet, samt for at få indført en forpligtelse for forældrene til at tilkendegive deres intention om at rejse og meddele dette til de sociale tjenester, som får overdraget ansvaret for børnene?
Will the Commission draw up a set of best practices together with the Member States with regard to the efficient collection of data on the number of parents who have left to work abroad, and the introduction of an obligation for parents to declare their intention to depart and to let the social services know in whose care these children will be left?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-6493/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-6493/08
Om: Mælk forurenet med melamin i Kina
Subject: Milk from China contaminated with melamine
Kommissionen skrev i sit svar på min tidligere forespørgsel ( E-5333/08 ) om det forurenede mælk fra Kina, at de kinesiske myndigheder ikke havde givet Kommissionen detaljerede oplysninger om ingredienserne i de blandingsprodukter, der blev eksporteret til EU, og at medlemsstaterne bør forbyde import til Fællesskabet af blandingsprodukter indeholdende mælk eller mælkeprodukter, som er beregnet til føde for spædbørn eller småbørn, og som stammer eller kommer fra Kina.
In reply to my previous question (E‑5333/08) concerning contaminated milk from China, the Commission indicated that the Chinese authorities had not provided it with any detailed analyses concerning the ingredients used in composite products exported to the EU, adding that Member States should prohibit the import into the Community of composite products containing milk or dairy products originating in or coming from China intended for consumption by infants or small children.
Er de kinesiske myndigheder forpligtet til at udlevere detaljerede oplysninger om ingredienserne i de blandingsprodukter, der er blevet eksporteret til EU, til Kommissionen?
Were the Chinese authorities required to provide the Commission with detailed analyses concerning the ingredients of composite products exported to the EU?
Hvorfor er der ikke blevet fremsat et tilsvarende krav fra fællesskabsmyndighederne?
Why was this not stipulated by the Community authorities?
Er Kommissionen forpligtet til at udlevere oplysninger om ingredienserne i produkter, som fremstilles i EU, og som eksporteres til tredjelande eller forbruges inden for EU?
Is the Commission required to provide analytical information concerning composite products manufactured in the EU intended for export to third countries or consumption within the EU?
Har medlemsstaterne — og nærmere bestemt Grækenland — meddelt Kommissionen, hvilke foranstaltninger de har truffet for at beskytte forbrugerne, og i særdeleshed børnene, mod de føromtalte produkter?
Have the Member States — and more specifically Greece — informed the Commission of the measures they have taken to protect consumers, in particular children, from the above composite products?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-6494/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-6494/08
Om: Fælles landbrugspolitik — tilskud pr. dyr
Subject: Common agricultural policy — subsidies per head of livestock
Under reformen af den fælles landbrugspolitik i 2003, der skulle sikre, at den berettigede kunne modtage tilskud pr. dyr, krævedes det af krydsoverensstemmelsesårsager, at der var overensstemmelse med miljølovgivningen, fødevaresikkerhedslovgivningen, dyrevelfærdslovgivningen, og at landbruget blev drevet under gode landbrugsmæssige og miljømæssige forhold.
Under the 2003 reform of the common agricultural policy, entitlement to subsidies per head of livestock was made subject to cross-compliance, making it necessary to meet a number of requirements, including environmental, food safety and animal welfare legislation, as well as high agricultural and environmental standards regarding farmland.
Efter beslutningen om at trække de krav, der ikke har forbindelse med ovennævnte, tilbage fra den obligatoriske liste, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende spørgsmål:
Following the decision to remove from the list of compulsory requirements those which did not relate to the above, can the Commission provide the following information:
Har en medlemsstat lovhjemmel til at indføre yderligere krav for at fremme tilskud pr. dyr?
Is it legal for a Member State to introduce additional requirements for entitlement to livestock subsidies?
Kan den f.eks. kræve overensstemmelse med andre lovmæssige hjælpeforanstaltninger, der ikke har forbindelse med de deregulerede krydsoverensstemmelsesspørgsmål?
For example, can a Member State require compliance with other legal provisions unrelated to former cross-compliance requirements?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-6495/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-6495/08
Om: Sikkerheden på småveje i EU
Subject: The safety of single lane roads in the EU