natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Burde ikke også de øvrige medlemmer af WTO følge dette eksempel?
Should not the other members of the WTO do the same?
Hvilken strategi følger Kommissionen i denne sammenhæng for at opnå, at de øvrige medlemmer af WTO vedtager en lignende holdning?
What is the Commission’s strategy to this end, in order to ensure that the other member countries of the WTO adopt a similar approach?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1079/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1079/05
Om: Handelsforbindelserne mellem EU og Kina
Subject: Commercial relations between the EU and China
Kan Kommissionen på baggrund af sin deltagelse i topmødet EU-Kina den 9. december 2004 i Haag give oplysning om de mest relevante konklusioner fra dette møde?
Can the Commission say what the most significant conclusions were following its participation in the EU-China summit held in The Hague on 9 December last year?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1080/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1080/05
Om: Dyresundhed og dyrebeskyttelse - EU-dyrepas
Subject: Animal health and protection - EU animal passport
Siden juli 2004 skal der ved rejser med hunde, katte og fritter uden for hjemlandet (kommerciel og ikke-kommerciel transport af selskabsdyr) medbringes et EU-dyrepas (forordning (EF) nr. 998/2003 EUT L 146 af 13.6.2003, s. 1. ).
Since July 2004, carrying an EU animal passport has been mandatory when travelling abroad with dogs, cats or ferrets (commercial and non-commercial movement of domestic animals) Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 OJ L 146, 13.6.2003, p.
Vil der i bekræftende fald også blive indført supplerende regler for disse dyrearter ved rejser til Irland, Sverige og Det Forenede Kongerige?
If so, will those species also be subject to additional rules for travel to Ireland, Sweden and the United Kingdom?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1081/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1081/05
Om: Præsidenten for Den Palæstinensiske Myndighed, Mahmoud Abbas', genindførelse af dødsstraf
Subject: Reintroduction of the death penalty by Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian National Authority
Den 16. februar 2005 bekendtgjorde Jerusalem Post, at præsidenten for Den Palæstinensiske Myndighed (ANP), Mahmoud Abbas, skulle have givet tilladelse til henrettelse af tre palæstinensiske statsborgere, hvis identitet ikke er blevet offentliggjort, men hvis forbrydelse - ifølge Sakher Bsaisso, højtstående repræsentant for Fatah og guvernør for ANP i den nordlige del af Gaza-striben - skulle bestå i at have hjulet Israel med at begå målrettede drab på palæstinensiske aktivister i Gaza-striben.
The Jerusalem Post reported on 16 February 2005 that the President of the Palestinian National Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, had authorised the execution of three Palestinians, whose identity was not made known, found guilty of helping Israel to carry out ‘targeted assassinations’ of Palestinian activists in the Gaza Strip, as reported by Sakher Bsaisso, high representative of Fatah and the Authority’s governor of the northern Gaza Strip.
Ifølge samme avis skal Mahmoud Abbas efter sit valg have godkendt flere dusin dødsdomme bl.a. mod palæstinensere, der betragtes som skyldige i almindelige kriminelle drab.
According to the newspaper, since he was elected Mahmoud Abbas has approved dozens of death sentences, some of them against Palestinians found guilty of common murder.
Den 25. februar 2005 oplyste Jerusalems mufti, sheik Ikrima Sabri, over for Reuters Bureau, at der er tale om 16 dødsdømte, hvis skæbne Mahmoud Abbas har skullet tage stilling til.
On 25 February 2005 the Mufti of Jerusalem, Sheikh Ikrima Sabri, confirmed to Reuters that 16 people had been condemned to death after Mahmoud Abbas had been called upon to decide their fate.
Den 3. marts 2005 oplyste muftien over for BBC, at han havde godkendt dødsdommene for fem fængslede, og at dommene kunne blive eksekveret inden udgangen af marts, fordi en udsættelse af eksekveringsordrene ville kunne opmuntre til private hævntogter i det palæstinensiske samfund.
On 3 March 2005 the Mufti confirmed to the BBC that that he had approved the death sentences on five prisoners, who might be executed before the end of March because to postpone the execution would ‘encourage the phenomenon of private vendettas’ among the Palestinian community.
På grundlag af ANP's lovgivning om strafferetspleje er der - når muftien har afgivet en positiv udtalelse, og ANP's præsident har ratificeret dommen - ikke længere nogen hindring for eksekveringen, selv om embedsmænd i ANP har præciseret, at der endnu ikke er taget nogen endelig beslutning om genanvendelse af dødsstraf, og at ingen eksekvering er umiddelbart forestående.
On the basis of the PNA’s Criminal Procedures Law, after approval of the sentence by the Mufti and ratification by the President of the Authority, there is no obstacle to execution, even though PNA officials have specified that no final decision has yet been taken on reintroduction of the death penalty and that no executions are imminent.
Siden oprettelsen af ANP i 1994 er seks palæstinensere blevet henrettet, heraf to i 2001, for »samarbejde« med Israel.
Since the PNA was set up in 1994, six Palestinians have been executed, two of them in 2001, for ‘collaborating’ with Israel.
De seneste henrettelser, der fandt sted i 2002, angik tre personer, der var anklaget for drab, men efterfølgende har ANP efter pres fra bl.a. EU undladt at benytte dødsstraf.
The last executions in 2002 involved three people accused of murder, but the PNA, following pressure from the EU, inter alia, suspended use of the death penalty.
Kan Kommissionen på denne baggrund oplyse følgende:
Can the Commission say: —
Er Kommissionen bekendt med de beskrevne kendsgerninger, og hvordan vurderer den ANP's præsidents beslutning om at genindføre dødsstraffen, som omsider under Arafat var blevet afskaffet, og hvilke initiativer vil den tage for at få omstødt de henrettelser, der allerede er givet tilladelse til?
whether it is aware of the facts described, and what it thinks of the PNA President’s decision to reintroduce the death penalty, which had been suspended by Arafat, and what steps it will take to ensure suspension of the executions already authorised; —
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at den omstændighed, at en afgørelse, som rettelig bør træffes af den civile myndighed, overlades til en religiøs myndighed, er en krænkelse af retsstatsprincipper?
whether it does not consider that to submit to a religious authority a decision coming under civil power constitutes a violation of the principles of a constitutional state; —
Vil Kommissionen gøre EU's støtte til ANP betinget af, at palæstinenserne respekterer de grundlæggende menneskerettigheder?
whether it intends to make European aid to the PNA subject to respect for the fundamental human rights of Palestinians?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1082/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1082/05
af Luisa Morgantini (GUE/NGL) , Luigi Cocilovo (ALDE) , Pasqualina Napoletano (PSE) , Enrico Letta (ALDE) og Lapo Pistelli (ALDE)
by Luisa Morgantini (GUE/NGL) , Luigi Cocilovo (ALDE) , Pasqualina Napoletano (PSE) , Enrico Letta (ALDE) and Lapo Pistelli (ALDE)
Om: Franske myndigheders manglende respekt for en unionsborgers grundlæggende rettigheder
Subject: Failure by the French authorities to respect the fundamental rights of a Union citizen
Som oplyst af pressen og andre kommunikationsmidler er en italiensk statsborger ved navn Franco La Cecla efter begivenheder, der udspillede sig mandag den 7. februar i Charles de Gaulle-lufthavnen i Paris, blevet indkaldt til at give møde for byretten i Bobigny den 26. maj 2005.
As was reported in the press and other media, following the incident at Charles de Gaulle airport on 7 February last Professor Franco La Cecla, an Italian citizen, was committed for trial and summoned to appear before the Bobigny Court of Major Jurisdiction on 26 May.
Franco La Ceclas brøde skal bestå i at have protesteret over den mishandling, som en senegalesisk illegal indvandrer blev udsat for af to franske politifolk, som han blev ekskorteret af .
La Cecla had allegedly protested at the ill-treatment suffered by a Senegalese illegal immigrant at the hands of two policemen who were escorting him.
Selv om der var tale om en tvungen hjemsendelse, burde ordensmagten afholde sig fra enhver form for magtmisbrug og vold, som ud over at gøre et negativt indtryk på andre passagerer også sætter menneskers førlighed og sikkerhed på spil.
Even if engaged in a forced repatriation operation, the police should refrain from any abuse or violence likely to produce an adverse impact on other passengers, thereby endangering their safety and security.
I forbindelse med en episode, der udspiller sig om bord på en flyvemaskine, er det i øvrigt kaptajnen, der har det beslutningsmæssige ansvar, hvilket ordensmagten åbenbart så stort på.
Furthermore, as far as events taking place on board an aircraft are concerned, the responsibility for taking decisions lies with the captain, although the security forces are apparently unaware of this.
Franco La Cecla blev bedt om at stige ud af flyet til et simpel dokumenttjek, men blev tilbageholdt i en celle i seks timer som en form for gengældelsesaktion fra ordensmagtens side.
Professor La Cecla was asked to disembark, supposedly for his papers to be checked, but he was instead detained for 6 hours and subjected to retaliatory action by the police.
Finder Kommissionen ikke, at denne form for magtmisbrug fra den franske ordensmagts side er forkastelig?
Does not the Commission consider this abuse of power on the part of the French police to be unacceptable?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe for at sikre, at Franco La Ceclas grundlæggende rettigheder respekteres?
What steps will the Commission take to ensure respect for Professor La Cecla’s fundamental rights?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1086/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1086/05
Om: EU-Kommissionens initiativ til begrænsning og reduktion af indholdet af dioxin og dioxinlignende PCB i fødevarekæden
Subject: Commission initiative to limit and/or reduce the presence of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in the food chain
På mødet i Den Stående Komité for Fødevarekæden og Dyresundhed den 14. februar 2005 forelagde Kommissionen dokument SANCO/00305/2005 med et forslag til forordning om grænseværdier for dioxin og dioxinlignende PCB i fødevarer og oplyste, at man havde til hensigt at notificere forordningsforslaget i WTO.
At the meeting of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 14 February 2005, the Commission presented document SANCO/00305/2005 containing a draft regulation setting maximum levels for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in foodstuffs and stated that it was intended to notify the draft regulation to the WTO.
Dermed findes der i en periode en dobbelt regulering af dioxin i fødevarer (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ).
The dioxin content of foodstuffs (WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ) is therefore doubly regulated for a limited period.
Dermed findes der også en dobbelt regulering af dioxin i foder (PCDD/F-WHO-TEQ).
The dioxin content of animal feed (PCDD/F-WHO-TEQ) is therefore also doubly regulated.
Er et parti mælk med et indhold af 5,5 pg WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ/g fedt, heraf 3,5 pg WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ/g fedt godkendt til afsætning i henhold til den ordning, der foreslås i dokument SANCO/00305/2005?
Under the rules proposed in document SANCO/00305/2005, is a milk batch containing 5.5 pg WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ/g fat, of which 3.5 pg WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ/g fat, marketable?
På grundlag af hvilken forskrift er et sådant parti mælk i benægtende fald ikke godkendt til afsætning?
If not, on the basis of what provision is such a milk batch not marketable?
Er et parti fiskeolie med et indhold af 22 ng WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ/kg , heraf 10 ng WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ/kg godkendt til afsætning i henhold til den ordning, der foreslås i dokument SANCO/00362/2005?
Under the rules proposed in document SANCO/00362/2005, is a fish oil batch containing 22 ng WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ/kg, of which 10 ng WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ/kg, marketable?
På grundlag af hvilken forskrift er et sådant parti fiskeolie i benægtende fald ikke godkendt til afsætning?
If not, on the basis of what provision is such a fish oil batch not marketable?
Hvorfor er der efter planen fastsat forskellige tidspunkter for ikrafttrædelsen af WHO- PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ-ordningen for fødevarer og foder?
Why are different dates planned for the entry into force of the WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ rules for foodstuffs and animal feed?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1087/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1087/05
Om: Dobbelte og separate toldkontroller i persontrafikken ved Sloveniens grænser til de tilgrænsende EU-medlemsstater
Subject: Duplicated separate customs controls on passenger traffic at the border between Slovenia and adjacent EU Member States
Har Kommissionen kendskab til, at togrejsende mellem Slovenien, der blev medlem af EU i 2004, og de tilgrænsende EU-medlemsstater i 2005 fortsat udsættes for to særskilte toldkontroller, således at f.eks. ventetiderne for internationale tog forlænges i Jesenice og Villach ved grænsen mellem Slovenien og Østrig og i Sežana og Villa Opicina ved grænsen mellem Slovenien og Italien?
Is the Commission aware that, in 2005, rail passengers travelling between Slovenia, which acceded to the EU in 2004, and adjacent EU Member States are still subject to two separate customs controls, with the result that lengthy stops are involved when international trains are halted in Jesenice and Villach, on the Slovenian-Austrian border, and in Sezana and Villa Opicina on the Slovenian-Italian border?
Mindes Kommissionen, at grænsekontrollerne i persontrafikken ved statsgrænserne i Europa allerede inden Schengen-aftalen og de efterfølgende udvidelser af EU i mange tilfælde blev foretaget i fællesskab eller i praksis til dels faldt bort mellem visse europæiske stater?
Does the Commission recall that, even before the Schengen Agreements had been signed and before the subsequent enlargements of the EU, border controls on passenger traffic at national frontiers in Europe were, in many instances, carried out jointly or, in the case of some European countries, had, in practice, even in part been abandoned?
Har Kommissionen kendskab til, at statsgrænserne i Schweiz, som ikke er medlem af EU, på indeværende tidspunkt kan passeres hurtigere og lettere end EU's indre grænser til EU-medlemsstaten Slovenien?
Is the Commission aware that, at present, it is quicker and easier to cross the international border between an EU Member State and Switzerland, which is not an EU Member State, than it is to cross the internal border between an EU Member Sate and Slovenia, which is an EU Member State?
Mener Kommissionen, at det er en positiv udvikling, at de lande, som opstod efter opløsningen af det tidligere Jugoslavien, herunder EU-medlemsstaten Slovenien, på indeværende tidspunkt foretager dobbelte og tidrøvende toldkontroller, som ofte allerede for længe siden er blevet afskaffet ved de andre grænser i Europa?
Does the Commission regard as an improvement the fact that the countries which emerged from the dissolution of the former Yugoslavia, including the EU Member State Slovenia, now undertake duplicated and time-wasting customs controls which have long been abolished at most of the other internal borders in Europe?
Er der planer om, at de slovenske grænsekontroller skal forenkles og afvikles hurtigere via fælles kontroller med toldmyndighederne i nabostaterne, eller vil denne usædvanlige situation trække ud så længe, indtil det meddeles, at Schengen-aftalen også finder anvendelse her?
Have any plans been devised with a view to simplifying and speeding up the border controls in Slovenia by the introduction of joint controls with the customs services of the adjacent countries, or will this exceptional situation continue to drag on until such time as the Schengen Agreements are declared to be applicable in this instance, too?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1088/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1088/05
Om: Møbelsektoren i Europa - følgerne af Reach
Subject: The furniture sector in Europe: the impact of REACH
De omkostninger, som Reach indebærer for de berørte industrier, herunder møbelindustrien, er med til at mindske denne sektors internationale konkurrenceevne.
The cost REACH will entail for the industries affected, including furniture, will reduce the sector’s international competitiveness.
Har Kommissionen fundet frem til metoder, der kan forhindre brugen af kemiske produkter, som ikke er registreret under Reach (og som følgelig er potentielt farlige), i importerede møbler?
Has the Commission identified ways of preventing chemical products not registered under REACH (and hence potentially hazardous) from being used in imported furniture?
Har den beregnet de yderligere omkostninger og det tab af konkurrenceevne, som Reach betyder for møbelsektoren?
Has the Commission calculated the additional cost and loss of competitiveness for the furniture sector inherent in REACH?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1089/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1089/05
Om: Møbelsektoren i Europa - handelsunderskud og faldende konkurrenceevne
Subject: The furniture sector in Europe: trade deficit and loss of competitiveness
Møbelsektoren har i de senere år været vidne til et alarmerende fald i konkurrenceevnen.
The furniture sector has lost competitiveness alarmingly in the last few years.
Stigningen i importen har været af et sådant omfang, at handelsunderskuddet i dag er på over 4 mia. euro i forhold til det overskud, der var en realitet for knap fem år siden.
Imports have grown at such a rate that there is a trade deficit of more than EUR 4000 million, in contrast with the trade surplus that existed until only five years ago.
Som følge heraf er tusindvis af arbejdspladser gået tabt.
As a result thousands of jobs have been lost.
De Forenede Stater har indført antidumping-foranstaltninger for soveværelsesmøbler importeret fra Kina.
The United States has introduced anti-dumping measures on bedroom furniture imported from China.
Eksporten af møbler fra Kina til EU-15 er steget med mere end 2 mia. euro i løbet af de seneste tre år.
Chinese exports to the EU of 15 have increased by more than EUR 2000 million in the last three years.
Design er imidlertid en af EU-møbelindustriens stærke sider.
However, design is one of the strong points of the EU furniture industry.
Der findes utallige dokumenterede eksempler på kinesiske virksomheder, som efterligner produkter fra møbelfabrikanter i EU, herunder også de fotos, de offentliggør i deres kataloger.
There are many documented cases of Chinese firms copying the products of EU furniture manufacturers, including the photographs published in catalogues.
EU's import af møbler er som led i WTO fritaget for told.
In the context of the WTO furniture imports into the EU are exempt from customs duties.
Møbelindustrien i EU anvender flere ikke-færdigbearbejdede materialer og produkter, som pålægges importtold, selv om de samme produkter kan indføres afgiftsfrit som møbler, når de anvendes af møbelindustrien i tredjelande.
Various materials and unfinished products used by the EU furniture industries are subject to customs duties, but when the same products are used by third-country firms they can be imported duty-free in the form of furniture.
Dette forhold begrænser yderligere den europæiske møbelindustris konkurrenceevne.
This situation reduces the competitiveness of the EU’s furniture industry even further.
Er Kommissionen i færd med at undersøge muligheden for at træffe foranstaltninger, som giver virksomhederne i den arbejdskraftintensive møbelsektor mulighed for at overleve?
Is the Commission examining the possibility of applying measures to enable furniture businesses to survive in this labour-intensive sector?
Kan Kinas eksport til EU efter Kommissionens opfattelse betegnes som dumping?
Does the Commission consider that China’s exports to the EU are characteriesed by practices that could be defined as dumping?
Hvad har Kommissionen foretaget sig for at sikre, at møbelindustriens intellektuelle ejendomsret ikke krænkes?
What is the Commission doing to ensure compliance with intellectual property rights in the furniture industry?
Agter Kommissionen at afskaffe importtolden på materialer, som anvendes til møbelfremstilling?
Does the Commission intend to eliminate import duties on materials used in furniture manufacture?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1090/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1090/05
Om: Møbelsektoren i Europa - det indre marked
Subject: The furniture sector in Europe: the internal market
EU's medlemsstater forlanger af møbelfirmaerne, at mærkningen af deres produkter indeholder mange meget forskellige oplysninger.
The Member States of the EU are asking furniture manufacturers to use labelling that shows a variety of information.
Agter Kommissionen at samordne disse mærkningskrav, der har konkurrencefordrejende virkninger for det indre marked?
Does the Commission envisage harmonising these labelling requirements, which distort the internal market?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1091/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1091/05
Om: Møbelsektoren i Europa - Kommissionens programmer
Subject: Furniture sector in Europe - Commission programmes
På konferencen arrangeret af Kommissionen om møbelindustriens fremtid i EU slog sektoren til lyd for, at der blev udviklet en specifik politik med henblik på at hjælpe denne arbejdskraftintensive industri med at overleve.
At a conference organised by the Commission on the future of the furniture industry in the EU, the furniture sector called for a specific policy on furniture to be devised and implemented in order to help a highly labour-intensive industry to survive.
Det er derfor meget vigtigt, at der udvikles programmer for innovation og internationalt samarbejde, da dette er en af de mest effektive måder at forbedre konkurrenceevnen på i arbejdskraftintensive industrier.
Introducing innovation and international-cooperation programmes is very important, since doing so is one of the most efficient ways of making labour-intensive industries more competitive.
Kommissionen havde tidligere forskellige programmer, f.eks. Jopp, der havde til formål at støtte virksomheder, som ønskede at opbygge et internationalt økonomisk samarbejde.
The Commission used to have a variety of programmes (such as JOPP) which provided support for businesses wishing to pursue international economic cooperation.
Denne individuelle støtte til virksomheder til såvel gennemførlighedsundersøgelser som programmer, der tog sigte på at forbedre de ansattes faglige kvalifikationer, er blevet afskaffet, undtagen hvad angår afholdelse af store møder.
Such support - which was offered to companies on an individual basis in order to enable them to carry out viability studies and implement programmes designed to enhance their employees' skills - has been withdrawn, except in the case of major meetings.
Programmet Asia-Invest har til formål på individuel basis at fremme asiatiske møbelvirksomheders adgang til faglig bistand, således at de kan forbedre deres konkurrenceevne.
Under the ASIA Invest programme, Asian furniture companies are given access on an individual basis to technical assistance which will enable them to improve their competitiveness.
Denne form for faglig bistand findes hverken for de nye medlemsstater og kandidatlandene eller for virksomhederne i EU-15.
In the case of the new Member States, the applicant countries and companies based in what was the 15-Member EU, that kind of technical assistance is not available.
Agter Kommissionen at udvikle denne form for industripolitik for møbelsektoren?
Is the Commission intending to develop an industrial policy of this nature for the benefit of the furniture sector?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvilken procentdel der er afsat til møbelindustrien på F&U-budgettet under det femte rammeprogram?
Would the Commission say what percentage of the Fifth Framework Programme R&D budget has been assigned to the furniture industry?
Hvor mange og hvilke forskningsprogrammer er godkendt inden for møbelsektoren?
Which - and how many - research projects relating to the furniture sector have been approved?
Kan Kommissionen endelig gøre rede for årsagerne til, at der ikke findes programmer for faglig bistand, som kunne hjælpe EU's møbelindustri med at forbedre konkurrenceevnen?
Would the Commission explain why there are no technical-assistance projects which would help the furniture industry to improve its competitiveness within the EU?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1092/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1092/05