natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kommissionen meddelte for nylig, at den har besluttet at indlede en procedure mod Portugal ved EF-­Domstolen for landets manglende overholdelse af de europæiske regler om cabotagesejlads.
The Commission recently announced that it has decided to bring proceedings against Portugal in the European Court of Justice on the grounds of its failure to comply with European legislation on maritime cabotage.
Denne situation er meget bekymrende, især for Azorerne, som er meget afhængige af søtransport både mellem øer i øgruppen og med omverdenen.
This situation is causing tremendous concern, particularly in the Azores, a region which is heavily dependent on maritime transport both between the various islands in the archipelago and with the outside world.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvorvidt retssagen blev fortsat, set i lyset af at Portugal har offentliggjort lovdekret nr. 7/­2006, hvormed der fastsættes et nyt retssystem for cabotagesejlads?
Can the Commission say whether the court case was continued in the light of the publication in Portugal in January 2006 of decree‑law No 7/2006 establishing the new legal system applicable to maritime cabotage?
Mener Kommissionen, at Azorernes særlige situation kan afspejles i lovgivningen, og er det muligt at indføre betinget liberalisering af cabotagesejlads?
Does the Commission believe that the exceptional situation of the Azores archipelago can be reflected in the legislation in some way, and is it possible to have a conditional liberalisation of maritime cabotage?
Hvis dette ikke er tilfældet, er Kommissionen opmærksom på, hvilke finansielle omkostninger opbygningen af et transportsystem vil have for den selvstyrende region Azorerne, og er den villig til at yde bistand til omkostningerne ved at etablere sådan et system?
If not, is the Commission aware of the financial effort which will be required of the Autonomous Region of the Azores in order to build up a transport system, and is it prepared to provide assistance with the costs of setting up such a system?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0615/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0615/06
Om: Udbredelse af korruption i EU-­medlemsstaternes offentlige sektor
Subject: Spread of public sector corruption in EU Member States
Under et seminar om stabilitetspagten for nylig i Thessaloniki drøftede man det vigtige spørgsmål om korruption i Sydøsteuropa og forbindelser mellem de politiske ledere og den organiserede kriminalitet.
A seminar on the Stability Pact recently held in Thessaloniki discussed the major problem of corruption in south-eastern Europe and the links between politicians and organised crime.
Ved denne lejlighed blev der præsenteret en liste, hvor man havde grupperet bestræbelserne på at bekæmpe dette fænomen i de sydøsteuropæiske lande.
A table was presented to the seminar detailing the measures taken by the countries of south-eastern Europe to combat this scourge.
Kan Kommissionen præsentere en liste over tilsvarende tiltag i kampen imod fænomenet i medlemsstaterne?
Could the Commission provide a table with information on the measures taken in this sphere by the Member States?
Findes der undersøgelser, der viser omfanget af problemet i hver af medlemsstaterne, og som inddeler disse efter problemets omfang?
Are there any studies showing the scale of the problem in each of the Member States, ranking them according to the severity of the problem?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0616/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0616/06
Om: Forbud mod britisk oksekød i Frankrig
Subject: Ban on British beef in France
Kan Kommissionen angive, hvilke bøder den franske regering har pålagt i forbindelse med dens ulovlige forbud mod eksport af oksekød fra Det Forenede Kongerige?
Will the Commission state what fines have been received from the French Government in connection with its illegal embargo on exports of beef from the United Kingdom?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0617/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0617/06
Om: International opmærksomhed omkring katastrofen ved Mangagoy på den filippinske ø Mindanao, hvor virksomheden PICOP truer beboernes liv alvorligt
Subject: International attention for the disaster arising around Mangagoy on the island of Mindanao in the Philippines where the business PICOP is seriously endangering residents' lives
I nogle år har den nye ejer ikke foretaget yderligere investeringer, således at der arbejdes med forældede maskiner, at den lovmæssige pligt til nyplantning kun opfyldes på arealer, der kan ses fra vejen, at der anvendes stærkt forurenende kul som brændsel, at der ikke længere udbetales lønninger i overensstemmelse med en kollektiv overenskomst, at dele af fabrikken i ugevis ligger stille, uden at der betales lønninger, og at antallet af arbejdspladser er faldet fra 8000 til 800?
In recent years the new owner has ceased to invest, so that old machinery is being used, the statutory obligation to replant areas where trees have been felled is now complied with only in cases where the area is visible from the road, highly polluting coal is being used as a fuel, workers are no longer being paid in accordance with a collective agreement on terms of employment, parts of the factory are idle for weeks without any payment being made to workers, and the number of jobs has fallen from 8000 to 800.
Store mængder kviksølv udledes med spildevandet, således at tilgrænsende havområder nu også er forurenede, det øvrige affald dumpes ubehandlet i Bislig-bugten, og der anvendes ikke længere filtre til at forhindre luftforurening, således at der udledes store mængder svovldioxid og nitrogendioxid i luften, hvilket har medført, at forekomsten af kræft i Mangagoy og den nærliggende landsby Tabon siden 2000 er steget drastisk, idet lungekræft i hele Bislig er blevet den mest almindelige dødsårsag, og bronkitis og lungebetændelse er langt mere almindelige end andetsteds, navnlig blandt børn.
Large quantities of mercury are now being discharged in effluent, which has polluted adjoining areas of the sea, other waste is dumped in the bay of Bislig without being treated, and air filters against pollution are no longer being used, so that large quantities of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide are being emitted into the air, with the consequence that since 2000 rates of cancer have been extremely high in Mangagoy and the nearby village of Tabon, while lung cancer has become the leading cause of death throughout Bislig and bronchitis and inflammation of the lungs are far more common than elsewhere, especially among children.
Deler Kommissionen bekymringen over det forhold, at der klart overtrædes love i Filippinerne, og at PICOP står på den officielle liste over de virksomheder, der er de største miljøsyndere, men at lokale og regionale politikere har finansielle interesser i PICOP, og at de kul, der anvendes, kommer fra en illegal mine, der drives uden licens af formanden for Repræsentanternes Hus, hvilket medfører, at mange klager ikke behandles, og at arbejderne på virksomheden tvinges til at underskrive et andragende, hvori der anmodes om forflytning af lokale præster, der gør opmærksom på tingenes tilstand?
Does the Commission share my concern about the fact that, within the Philippines, laws are being violated and PICOP figures on the official list of businesses which commit the most environmental offences, but that local and regional politicians have financial interests in PICOP and that the coal which is being used comes from an illegal mine, operated without a permit by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, with the result that the numerous complaints are not considered and that the business's workers are compelled to sign a petition calling for local priests who have drawn attention to this scandal to be transferred elsewhere?
Hvordan kan den Europæiske Union bidrage til at afhjælpe denne ekstreme situation, der, selv om den ganske vist er opstået langt uden for Europa, er et klart eksempel på urimelig accept af sygdom, lugtgener, skovning, miljøforurening, dårlige arbejdsvilkår, arbejdsløshed og opgivelse blandt den lokale befolkning?
What can the European Union do to help remedy this extreme situation, which, although it has arisen a long way from Europe, is an abundantly clear example of how not to tackle disease, odour nuisance, deforestation, pollution, poor working conditions, unemployment and despair among the local population?
Hvorledes bidrager Unionen til den overbevisning, at denne situation ikke kan vare ved, og hvilke sanktioner er mulige?
What will it do to help convince people that this situation cannot continue, and what penalties can be applied?
Hvilken rolle kan handelsforbindelser, udviklingshjælp og internationale aftaler om miljø, folkesundhed og menneskerettigheder spille i denne forbindelse?
What role can trade relations, development aid and international agreements on the environment, public health and human rights play in this?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0618/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0618/06
Om: Hindringer for den videre udvidelse af EU som følge af voksende bekymring over nye arbejdstageres arbejde på dårlige vilkår i de gamle medlemsstater
Subject: Obstacles to further enlargement of the EU caused by increasing concern over poor employment conditions for new arrivals in the old Member States
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at dette problem navnlig er aktuelt for dem, der arbejder med status som »selvstændige uden personale«, og at denne mulighed bevidst misbruges for at lade personer, der egentlig er arbejdstagere, arbejde til en væsentligt lavere løn?
Is the Commission aware that this problem particularly applies to individuals with ‘self‑employed’ status, which is being deliberately misused as a way of getting people who are in reality employees to work for considerably lower pay?
Erkender Kommissionen faren for, at den offentlige mening i de nuværende medlemsstater, selv i ganske nytiltrådte medlemsstater, som følge af gentagne negative erfaringer modsætter sig tiltrædelse af nye medlemsstater, der har et lavere lønniveau og ringere social beskyttelse end de nuværende medlemsstater, i hvert fald så længe der ikke er effektive garantier for tilstrækkelig beskyttelse af de nationale arbejdsvilkår og den nødvendige kontrol hermed?
Does the Commission acknowledge the danger that, in response to a succession of negative experiences, public opinion in the current Member States, and even in the Member States which recently acceded, may oppose the admission of other new Member States that have lower wages and poorer standards of social protection than the current Member States, at any rate as long as there are no sound guarantees that internal employment conditions will be adequately protected and that the necessary controls are in place?
Kan de nuværende medlemsstater kun beskytte deres nationale arbejdsvilkår ved at gøre brug af muligheden for indtil 2011 at holde deres arbejdsmarked lukket for nye arbejdstagere og derefter ved at modsætte sig optagelse af Rumænien og Bulgarien i 2007 eller 2008 og, på et senere tidspunkt, også af de tidligere jugoslaviske republikker Kroatien og Makedonien samt af Tyrkiet, der nu har status af kandidatland?
Are the current Member States only able to protect their internal employment conditions by continuing to make use of the possibility of keeping their employment market closed to newcomers until 2011 and by opposing the admission of Romania and Bulgaria in 2007 or 2008 and at a later stage that of the former Yugoslav Republics of Croatia and Macedonia and Turkey, which have the status of candidate countries?
Hvilke muligheder ser Kommissionen for, at EU-medlemsstaterne kan udforme en varig og sammenhængende ordning, hvori arbejde, der er aftalt til en lavere løn og på ringere vilkår end de nationale, gøres umuligt og omfattes af en effektiv kontrol?
What possibilities do EU Member States have, in the Commission's view, for developing a reliable, permanent system which would make it impossible for people to be employed at lower rates of pay and under poorer conditions than provided for under national law and which would ensure that full controls are in place?
Forsømmer de medlemsstater, der ikke når dette mål, at udnytte de gældende muligheder?
Are Member States which are not managing to achieve this failing to make use of existing possibilities?
Hvorledes bidrager Kommissionen til, at der ikke herved opstår unødvendige modsætninger mellem de europæiske folk og til, at den bekymrede offentlige mening ikke gør det yderligere umuligt for de nationale parlamenter at acceptere fortsat optagelse af nye medlemsstater?
What steps is the Commission taking to ensure that this does not lead to unnecessary opposition between the peoples of Europe and that public concerns do not make it increasingly impossible for EU Member States' national parliaments to approve the continued admission of new Member States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0619/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0619/06
Om: Albufera de Mallorca
Subject: The Albufera wetland in Majorca
Albufera er et vådområde på Mallorca, som er erklæret naturreservat af den selvstyrende region Balearerne, der er en Ramsar-lokalitet i henhold til direktiv 79/­109/­EØF EFT L 103 af 25.4.1979, s. 1 . , det såkaldte fugledirektiv, og desuden et særligt fuglereservat.
Albufera, a wetland on the island of Majorca, is a nature reserve belonging to the Autonomous Community of the Balearics.
Der var således, baseret på lov nr. 4/­1989 om en bevarelse af naturområder, flora og fauna i skove, tale om en overholdelse af regler afledt af gennemførelsen af europæiske bestemmelser.
In February 2005 the present government of the Balearics suspended a decree (No 4 of 28 January 1988) adopted by the previous government to amend the decree declaring the area a nature reserve (No 52 of 16 May 2003) with the aim of extending the protection area, thereby including important habitats and species, in order to bring the provisions into line with the legislation resulting from the transposition of European legislation, such as Law No 4/1989 on the conservation of natural areas and wild flora and fauna.
Miljøet i Albufera er forandret som følge af turismeindustrien, og disse forandringer har haft negative konsekvenser for bevaringsmålene for reservatet.
The surroundings of Albufera have suffered as a result of changes brought about by the tourist industry, which are having an adverse effect on the reserve’s conservation objectives.
Desuden giver suspensionen af anvendelsen af dekretet om udvidelse af reservatet mulighed for at bygge golfbane på Murostranden.
Furthermore, suspension of the decree extending the reserve makes a project to build a golf course at Playa de Muro possible.
Havde Kommissionen kendskab til Balearernes regerings tiltag vedrørende dekret 4/­1998, som påvirker det særlige fuglereservat (SE 0000038), Ramsar-lokaliteten og naturreservatet på Albufera de Mallorca?
Is the Commission aware of the actions of the government of the Balearics in connection with the suspension of the amending decree affecting the Albufera wetland, which has been declared an SPA (code number SE 0000038), a Ramsar site and a nature reserve?
Havde den kendskab til Balearernes regerings tiltag, hvad angår suspensionen af dette dekret, som påvirker de fuglearter, der er beskyttet af »fugledirektivet«, og særligt biæderen (Merops apiaster) og Eleonorafalken (Falco eleonorae)?
Is the Commission aware of the actions of the government of the Balearics in connection with the abovementioned amending decree affecting bird species protected by Directive 79/409/EEC ( Merops apiaster and Falco eleonorae )?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0620/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0620/06
Om: Grønbog om realkredit
Subject: Green Paper on mortgage credit
Kan Kommissionen anføre tidsplanen og medlemssammensætningen for den ekspertgruppe, der diskuterer Kommissionens grønbog om realkredit?
Can the Commission give details of the composition of the expert group discussing the Commission’s Green Paper on mortgage credit and clarify the timetable for those discussions?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0621/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0621/06
Om: EU's vandinitiativ
Subject: European Union water initiative
Kan Kommissionen dokumentere det gode resultat af EU's vandinitiativ i de sidste fire år?
Can the Commission provide evidence to demonstrate the success of the European Union water initiative over the past four years?
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, hvilke målbare mål der er fastsat for at registrere de gode resultater af projektet, og agter Kommissionen at udarbejde halvårlige oversigtsstatistikker for de gode resultater af initiativet?
Would the Commission confirm what measurable targets are in place to determine the success of the project, and is it prepared to provide six-monthly review statistics on the success of the initiative?
Hvis dette ikke er til rådighed, kan Kommissionen så anføre, hvorfor og hvilke oplysninger der er disponible nu, og om der kan rettes op på situationen i løbet at de næste seks måneder?
If such statistics are not available, can the Commission explain why and state what information is available now and whether it is likely to rectify the situation in the next six months?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0622/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0622/06
af Astrid Lulling (PPE-DE)
by Astrid Lulling (PPE‑DE)
Om: Misbrug af en traditionel betegnelse
Subject: Misuse of a traditional term
En fransk vinavlersammenslutning har for nylig informeret mig om, at vinavlere fra tredjelande misbruger betegnelsen »vendanges tardives« (en traditionel fransk betegnelse).
A French winegrowers’ association has recently alerted the author of this question to the fact that non-EU businesses are misusing the term ‘vendanges tardives’ (a French traditional term).
Det ser således ud til, at Chile anvender betegnelsen på engelsk (»late harvest«) om sin hvidvin »Santa Helena«, der sælges til spotpris, nemlig 5,45 EUR pr. 50 cl eller 10,90 EUR pr. liter.
It seems that Chile is using the English term ‘late harvest’ for its Saint Helena white wine, which is sold at a derisory price of EUR 5.45 for 50 cl or EUR 10.90 a litre.
Risikerer anvendelsen af en traditionel betegnelse, der ikke er beskyttet i tredjelande, ikke at udgøre en illoyal konkurrence?
Is there not a risk that use in non-EU countries of a traditional term that is not protected will create unfair competition?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0623/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0623/06
Om: Fabio Capellos forherligelse af Franco-perioden
Subject: Fabio Capello's defence of the Franco regime
Den nuværende træner for fodboldklubben Juventus i Torino (og tidligere træner for Real Madrid og Roma), Fabio Capello, har for nylig til det italienske dagblad La Repubblica udtalt, at i Spanien fungerer tingene, der er velopdragenhed, renlighed og orden, »takket være arven fra Francisco Franco«.
In recent comments to the Italian daily newspaper La Repubblica, the coach of Turin-based Juventus (and former coach of Real Madrid and Roma), Fabio Capello, stated that everything worked well in Spain and that there were good manners, cleanliness and order thanks to the legacy of Francisco Franco.
Udtalelserne falder endvidere på et tidspunkt, hvor vold, racisme og anvendelse af fascistiske symboler breder sig på alarmerende vis i mange fodboldarenaer.
The remarks have also been made at a time when violence, racism and the presence of fascist symbols are increasing at an alarming rate on many football pitches.
F.eks. har fodboldspilleren Paolo di Canio, der spiller for Lazio, gentagne gange fejret sine scoringer med fascistiske hilsener til sine fans, og den italienske fodboldligas disciplinære myndighed har for nylig dømt Roma til at spille en kamp uden tilskuere på det olympiske stadion, fordi klubbens tilhængere har fremvist fascistiske symboler.
For example, the Lazio player Paolo Di Canio has repeatedly celebrated his goals with fascist salutes to fans and the disciplinary committee of the Italian football league recently ordered Roma to play a match behind closed doors at the Olympic Stadium as a punishment for the the fascist symbols displayed by the team's supporters.
Eftersom Den Europæiske Union i høj grad er et resultat af kampen for demokrati og menneskerettigheder på vort kontinent, bør udbredelsen af fascistiske symboler samt banaliseringen eller den direkte lovprisning af enhver form for fascisme, herunder den, som Spanien blev udsat for under Franco, imødegås politisk på energisk og kontant vis af de europæiske institutioner.
Given that the European Union is largely a result of the fight for democracy and human rights on this continent, the growing presence of fascist symbols and the trivialisation or straightforward defence of any kind of fascism, including that which afflicted Spain under the name of Francoism, should be challenged by the European institutions, politically but energetically and forcefully.
Agter Kommissionen på den baggrund at træffe foranstaltninger over for udtalelser af den nævnte art?
In view of the above, will the Commission take action regarding comments of this kind?
Mener den, at det er mindre alvorligt at hylde Francos fascistregime end Hitlers og Mussolinis totalitære styrer?
Does the Commission consider it less shocking to speak in defence of Franco's fascist regime than in defence of the totalitarian regimes of Hitler and Mussolini?
Hvilke konkrete skridt har den taget eller agter den at tage over for udbredelsen af sådanne udtalelser og af lovprisninger af de forskellige former for fascisme, som har hjemsøgt Europa?
What specific measures has the Commission taken or does it intend to take to tackle the increasing incidences of this sort of statement and apologies for the various forms of fascism that have plagued Europe?
Agter den at støtte udnævnelsen af 2006 til historisk mindeår i Spanien?
Will the Commission support the declaration of 2006 as a year of historical remembrance in Spain?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0624/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0624/06
Om: Arbejde i EU efter 60-­årsalderen — fælles luftfartsforordninger
Subject: Working in Europe over the age of 60 — joint aviation regulations
Hvilke eventuelle forpligtelser skal medlemsstaterne opfylde med hensyn til gensidig anerkendelse af certifikater?
What, if any, obligations are the Member States under as regards mutual recognition of licences?
Rådet henviser det ærede medlem til svaret på forespørgsel E-­1636/­99, som også er relevant for situationen i dag.
The Council refers the Honourable Member to its reply to Question E‑1636/99 , which is still applicable to the situation today.
Rådet mener derfor, at det første spørgsmål allerede er besvaret.
The Council therefore considers that the first question has already been answered.
Med hensyn til det andet spørgsmål erindrer Rådet om, at medlemsstaternes forpligtelser med hensyn til gensidig anerkendelse af certifikater er fastsat i Rådets direktiv 91/­670/­EØF af 16. december 1991 om gensidig anerkendelse af personcertifikater, der giver adgang til udøvelse af funktioner i civil luftfart ( EFT L 373 af 31.12.1991 , s. 21).
With respect to the second question, the Council recalls that the obligations of Member States as regards mutual recognition of licences are set out in Council Directive 91/670/EEC of 16 December 1991 on mutual acceptance of personnel licences for the exercise of functions in civil aviation ( OJ L 373, 31.12.1991 , p.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0625/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0625/06
Om: Det nationale råd for samarbejde om etniske og demografiske spørgsmål i Bulgarien
Subject: National Council for Cooperation on Ethnic and Demographic Issues in Bulgaria
Den administrative kapacitet for det nationale råd for samarbejde om etniske og demografiske spørgsmål (NCCEDI) i Bulgarien er stadig langt fra at være tilstrækkelig til at opfylde sine forpligtelser.
The administrative capacity of the National Council for Cooperation on Ethnic and Demographic Issues (NCCEDI) in Bulgaria is still far from being adequate to meet its obligations.
Ved Kommissionen, hvornår NCCEDI begynder at arbejde effektivt og når op på sin fulde kapacitet?
Does the Commsion know when the NCCEDI will start to work effectively engaging its full capacity?