natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Da flertallet af disse medarbejdere anvender metroen og andre miljøvenlige transportmidler, vil flytningen uvægerligt medføre en betydelig og uacceptabel forøgelse i anvendelsen af privatbiler til turen mellem hjem og arbejdsplads og til og fra Europa-kvarteret i løbet af arbejdsdagen.
As most of these staff at present use the metro or other environmentally‑friendly means of transport, the move will inevitably mean a significant and unacceptable increase in the use of individual vehicles for journeys between home and work and to and from the quartier européen during the working day.
Hvordan kan Kommissionen på et tidspunkt, hvor trafikforureningen i Bruxelles er særlig slem og stigende, retfærdiggøre et sådant tiltag, som er i modstrid med dens egen bygningspolitik?
At a time when the traffic pollution in Brussels is particularly acute and worsening, how can the Commission justify such a move, in breach of its own buildings policy?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0706/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0706/06
Om: Rejseforbuddet for tamilske tigre
Subject: Tamil Tigers travel ban
Hvor længe regner Kommissionen med at opretholde rejseforbuddet for de tamilske tigre?
How long does the Commission envisage continuing to uphold the travel ban on the Tamil Tigers?
Hvad har man gjort for at forsøge af få forbuddet ophævet?
What steps have been taken to try and lift the ban?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0707/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0707/06
Om: Boykot af Danmark på grund af uroen omkring en række tegninger — virksomheden Carrefour mod Danmark
Subject: Boycott of Denmark in response to the row over cartoons — Carrefour versus Denmark
Hetzen over karikaturerne i Jyllands-Posten har nu raset i nogle uger.
For a number of weeks a furious campaign has been directed against the publication of cartoons in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten .
Den 23. januar indførte Saudi-Arabien som første islamiske stat en boykot af danske produkter.
On 23 January Saudi Arabia became the first Islamic state to announce a boycott of Danish products.
Forskellige lande i Mellemøsten er fulgt efter.
A number of other countries in the Middle East have followed suit.
Også palæstinenserne boykotter massivt danske produkter.
Palestinians are also boycotting Danish products in huge numbers.
Af frygt for at blive ramt af boykot har den franske distributionsvirksomhed Carrefour besluttet at fjerne alle danske produkter fra hylderne. (»Carrefour don't carry Danish products«).
For fear of also being hurt by the boycott, French distribution company Carrefour has decided to take all Danish products off its shelves in Islamic countries (‘Carrefour don’t carry Danish products’).
Carrefour er en europæisk virksomhed og deltager dermed i boykotten af et EU-­medlem.
Carrefour, which is a European company, is thereby effectively participating in the boycott against an EU Member State.
Har Kommissionen allerede taget stilling til denne praksis i virksomheden Carrefour?
Has the Commission already set out its position regarding these practices on the part of Carrefour?
Vil Kommissionen over for virksomheden Carrefour insistere på, at den straks standser denne praksis?
Will the Commission be pressing Carrefour to immediately put an end to such practices?
Vil Kommissionen om nødvendigt drøfte sagen med den franske regering?
Does the Commission intend if necessary to consult with the French Government on this matter?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0708/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0708/06
Om: Boykot af dansk erhvervsliv på grund af uroen omkring en række tegninger
Subject: Boycott of the Danish economy in response to the row over cartoons
Den svensk-danske mejerivirksomhed Arla, der eksporterer for over 250 mio. EUR til regionen, blev det første offer for boykotten.
The Swedish‑Danish dairy company Arla, whose exports to the region are worth more than EUR 250 million, has become the first victim of the boycott.
Arla har allerede måttet nedlægge et par hundrede job og lukke enkelte filialer.
It has already been forced to get rid of several hundred jobs and to close a number of branches.
Arla har tabt skønsmæssigt 1,3 mio. EUR daglig siden slutningen af januar som følge af boykotten (artikel af 9. februar i magasinet Le Point, »Danmark boykottet«).
Arla has been losing an estimated EUR 1.3 million a day since the end of January as a consequence of the boycott ( Le Point , ‘Le Danemark boycotté’, 9 February).
Også andre danske fødevarevirksomheder og farmaceutiske virksomheder er allerede blevet offer for boykotten.
Other Danish food and pharmaceutical companies have also already been hurt by the boycott.
Jyske Bank skønner, at hvis boykotten varer et år, risikerer Danmark at miste 11200 arbejdspladser og tabe 1 mia. EUR i indtægter.
The Danish bank Jyske Bank estimates that, if the boycott goes on for a year, there is a danger that Denmark could lose some 11200 jobs and suffer a EUR 1000 million drop in revenues.
Hvad vil Kommissionen gøre for at støtte den danske økonomi, hvis Saudi-Arabien og Mellemøsten fortsætter deres boykot?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to support the Danish economy, should the boycott by Saudi Arabia and other countries in the Middle East continue?
Hvilke repressalier overvejer Kommissionen eventuelt at træffe, hvis boykotten af danske produkter ikke straks standses?
What reprisals does the Commission envisage possibly taking if there is not an immediate end to the boycotting of Danish products?
Vil Kommissionen stille støtten til Palæstina i bero, hvis Den Palæstinensiske Myndighed ikke gør en indsats for straks at normalisere situationen?
Will the Commission be suspending assistance for Palestine, should the Palestinian Authority not make efforts to immediately bring the situation back to normal?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0710/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0710/06
af Carmen Fraga Estévez (PPE-DE)
by Carmen Fraga Estévez (PPE‑DE)
Om: Formålet med »Deepnet-rapporten«
Subject: Objective of the ‘Deepnet’ report
Kommissionen har oplyst, at Kommissionen har oplyst, at den rapport, der blev anvendt som grundlag for at forbyde anvendelse af hildingsgarn i ICES-afsnit VI a, b og VII b, c, j, k og i ICES-underområde XII, har fået titlen »A preliminatry investigation on shelf edge and deepwater fixed net fisheries to West and North of Great Britain, Ireland, around Rockall and Hatton Bank« (Hareide et al.), også kaldet »Deepnet«.
The Commission has stated that the report used as the basis for banning the use of gillnets in ICES divisions VI a, b and VII b, c, j, k and subarea XII was the report entitled ‘A preliminary investigation on shelf edge and deepwater fixed net fisheries to the West and North of Great Britain, Ireland, around Rockall and Hatton Bank’ (Hereide et al.), also known as ‘Deepnet’.
Ifølge denne rapport er det vigtigste formål med undersøgelsen at foretage en revision af »den engelsk-spanske hildingsgarnsflådes« fiskeri med hildingsgarn.
According to that report, the prime objective of the investigation was to review the ‘Anglo-Spanish’ gill and tangle net fisheries.
Kan Kommissionen forklare, hvorfor hovedformålet med rapporten er at undersøge en særlig flåde, der fisker i et bestemt område?
Can the Commission explain why the prime objective of the report should have been to study one particular fleet which operates in one particular area?
Kan Kommissionen ligeledes forklare, hvorfor den har besluttet at fokusere undersøgelsen på eller, hvis det ikke har været dens initiativ, hvorfor den har besluttet at anvende en rapport, der kun analysere en del af fællesskabsfarvandene?
In the same context, can the Commission clarify why it decided to focus the investigation on these areas, or — if the investigation was not carried out on the Commission's initiative — why it decided to use a report which analyses only one section of Community waters?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at det ville have været fornuftigere og mindre diskriminerende at få en mere global undersøgelse for med større nøjagtighed at kunne analysere den rolle, som hildingsgarnene spiller i EF-­farvandene og følgerne af et generelt forbud?
Does the Commission not believe that it would have been more prudent and less discriminatory to have a broader study, making it possible to analyse exactly what role is played by gillnets in Community waters and what consequences a general ban would have?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0711/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0711/06
Om: Målarter i »Deepnet-rapporten«
Subject: Species dealt with in the ‘Deepnet’ report
Kommissionen har oplyst, at den rapport, der blev anvendt som grundlag for at forbyde anvendelse af hildingsgarn i ICES-afsnit VI a, b og VII b, c, j, k og i ICES-underområde XII, har fået titlen »A preliminatry investigation on shelf edge and deepwater fixed net fisheries to West and North of Great Britain, Ireland, around Rockall and Hatton Bank« (Hareide et al.), også kaldet »Deepnet«.
The Commission has stated that the report used as the basis for banning the use of gillnets in ICES divisions VI a, b and VII b, c, j, k and subarea XII was the report entitled ‘A preliminary investigation on shelf edge and deepwater fixed net fisheries to the West and North of Great Britain, Ireland, around Rockall and Hatton Bank’ (Hereide et al.), also known as ‘Deepnet’.
Det andet forskningsformål, som indgår af rapporten, er at indsamle data til forbedring af kendskabet til dybhavsfiskebestandene og i særdeleshed til dybshavshajer.
The second investigation objective defined in the report was to gather data in order to improve assessments of deepwater stocks and especially of deepwater sharks.
Ifølge rapporten selv lever disse arter i mellem 600 og 1200 meters dybde.
According to the report, the above species' habitat is found at depths between 600 and 1200 metres.
Bestanden af havtasker lever i henhold til undersøgelsen fortrinsvis fra og med 500-600 meters dybde, også i de områder, hvor den kan betragtes som en målart.
With regard to monkfish, the study places the majority of stocks at depths from 500/600 metres, even in areas where monkfish can be considered a target species.
Kan Kommissionen på grundlag af disse oplysninger forklare, hvad der er grunden til at forbyde anvendelsen af hildingsgarn fra og med 200 meters dybde?
Based on this data, can the Commission clarify the reasons for banning this fleet's activity from a depth of 200 metres?
Kan Kommissionen kommentere den kendsgerning, at selv om målet med undersøgelsen har været at undersøge de ca. 15 fartøjer, der udgør den engelsk-spanske hildingsgarnsflåde, gør forbudszonen det umuligt at fiske for omkring 80 af EF-­flådens fartøjer?
How does the Commission assess the fact that, even though the objective of the investigation was to study the 15 or so vessels which make up the Anglo-Spanish gillnet fleet, the area covered by the ban means that around 80 vessels from the Community fleet are prevented from operating?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0712/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0712/06
Om: Konklusioner i »Deepnet-­rapporten«
Subject: Conclusions of the ‘Deepnet’ report
Rapporten »A preliminatry investigation on shelf edge and deepwater fixed net fisheries to West and North of Great Britain, Ireland, around Rockall and Hatton Bank« (Hareide et. al.), også kaldet »Deepnet-rapporten«, har efter hvad Kommissionen oplyser været anvendt som grundlag for at forbyde brug af hildingsgarn i ICES-afsnit VI a, b og VII b, c, j, k og i ICES-underområde XII.
According to the Commission, the report entitled ‘A preliminary investigation on shelf edge and deepwater fixed net fisheries to the West and North of Great Britain, Ireland, around Rockall and Hatton Bank’ (Hereide et al.), also known as ‘Deepnet’, was used as the basis for banning the use of gillnets in ICES divisions VI a, b and VII b, c, j, k and subarea XII.
I betragtning af, at der i rapportens afsnit med konklusioner ingen steder henvises til, at det er nødvendigt eller bare hensigtsmæssigt at forbyde anvendelse af hildingsgarn, men at rapporten begrænser sig til at analysere forvaltningsforanstaltninger af almen karakter, som er gyldige for alle EU's dybhavsområder, kan Kommissionen da forklare, hvorfor den har besluttet at indføre så drastisk en foranstaltning som et forbud mod et fiskeredskab?
Given that the conclusions section of the report makes no reference at all to the need or even desirability of a ban on the use of gillnets, instead confining itself to analysing management measures in general, applicable to any of the Community's deepwater areas, can the Commission explain why it has decided to take such a drastic measure as banning a type of gear?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0713/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0713/06
Om: Rapport om gennemførelsen af tobaksvaredirektivet (KOM(2005)0339)
Subject: Report on the application of the Tobacco Products Directive (COM(2005)339)
Ifølge protokollen fra mødet i forskriftsudvalget (jf. artikel 10 i direktiv 2001/­37/­EF) i november 2004 krævede Østrig for så vidt angik artikel 11-rapporten, at der skulle foretages en omhyggelig undersøgelse i rapporten af tobaksvarer med formindsket risiko som f.eks. røgfri tobaksvarer (snus).
The minutes of the Regulatory Committee (as per Article 10 of Directive 2001/37/EC) meeting of November 2004 state about the Article 11 report that ‘Austria requested that harm reduction products, such as some smokeless tobacco products (e.g. snus), should be carefully studied in the report’.
Den endelige rapport indeholder imidlertid intet om tobaksvarer med formindsket risiko, fordi medlemsstaterne tilsyneladende ikke fremsendte oplysninger om dette spørgsmål.
Yet the final report submitted to us includes nothing on tobacco products with the potential to reduce harm because apparently Member States did not submit any information on this.
I henhold til artikel 11 skal Kommissionen imidlertid være særlig opmærksom på vurdering af tobaksvarer, som måske har potentiale til at mindske skadevirkningerne.
However, Article 11 requires the Commission to pay special heed to evaluation of tobacco products which may have the potential to reduce harm.
Hvorfor er dette ikke blevet gjort, og hvad vil Kommissionen gøre for at sikre, at dette spørgsmål behandles i den næste rapport?
Why was this not done, and what will the Commission do to ensure it is included in the next report?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0714/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0714/06
Om: Konsekvenserne for palæstinensiske skolebørn af et bo tæt på de israelske bosættelser
Subject: Effect on Palestinian schoolchildren living near Israeli settlements
Hvad foretager Kommissionen for at sikre, at skoledagen for palæstinensiske børn, der bor tæt på de israelske bosættelser, ikke er fyldt med vold og intimidering.
What steps is the Commission taking to ensure that education for Palestinian children living near Israeli settlements remains free from violence and intimidation?
En af mine vælgere besøgte for nylig Hebron, hvor vedkommende bemærkede, at palæstinensiske skolebørn uden ledsagere dagligt blev udsat for røntgenkontrol fra bevæbnede israelske soldaters side.
A constituent of mine has recently visited Hebron and noted that unaccompanied Palestinian schoolchildren are subjected to daily x‑rays by armed Israeli soldiers.
Desuden foregår undervisningen ofte under farlige forhold, og børnene lider fysisk og psykisk af stress på grund af disse forhold.
In addition they often study in dangerous conditions, and suffer physically and mentally as a result of the stress of studying in such conditions.
Desuden bedes Kommissionen oplyse, hvad den foretager over for den israelske regering for at overbevise den om konsekvenserne af de israelske besættelser på de palæstinensiske børns uddannelse og velfærd, som bor i nærheden?
Furthermore what steps is the Commission taking to emphasise to the Israeli Government the effect of the Israeli settlements on the education and well‑being of the Palestinian children living nearby?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0715/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0715/06
Om: Menneskerettighedssituationen i Kina — forfølgelse af kristne og tilhængere af Falun Gong
Subject: Human-rights situation in China — persecution of Christians and of Falun Gong members
Gao Zhisheng er en 41-­årig kinesisk advokat, der kæmper for, at Kina endelig indfører retsstatsprincipperne.
The 41-year-old Gao Zhisheng is a Chinese lawyer who is fighting to ensure that the principles of constitutional government finally prevail.
Han har i årevis forsvaret personer, der har kritiseret myndighedernes overgreb og krævet ytrings- og tankefrihed.
For years he has sided with those who challenge the authorities' malpractices and call for freedom of speech and the freedom to express one's thoughts.
Den 6. februar 2005 lancerede Gao Zhisheng en national kampagne med sultestrejker til støtte for Yang Maodong (også kendt som Guo Feixiong), en advokat, der navnlig har engageret sig i forsvaret af indbyggerne i landsbyen Taishi i Guandong, som kæmper for at få den korrupte leder af landsbyen fjernet og få indført demokrati i den lokale politiske og økonomiske forvaltning.
On 6 February, Gao Zhisheng launched a nationwide campaign of hunger strikes in support of Yang Maodong (also known as Guo Feixiong) — a lawyer who is involved in particular in defending the people of Taishi (a village in Guangdong), who are endeavouring to remove their corrupt village chief and to introduce democracy into the way in which politics and the local economy are run.
Netop som følge af dette engagement er Yang flere gange blevet udsat for vold og mishandlinger udøvet af politiet og »ukendte voldsmænd«, som er kommet for at udspionere ham 24 timer i døgnet.
Precisely on account of his involvement, Yang has on a number of occasions been subjected to violence and ill-treatment at the hands of the police and ‘unknown assailants’, who have been shadowing him 24 hours a day.
Sidste torsdag fotograferede de Yang, hans kone og deres to børn.
Last Thursday they took photographs of him, his wife and their two children.
Dagen efter opsøgte Yang »fotograferne« og tvang dem til at følge med til en politistation, hvor han fik dem til at udlevere filmrullerne.
The next day, Yang sought out the ‘photographers’ and forced them to accompany him to a police station, where he made them hand over the camera films.
Da han var kommet ud, blev han banket af syv »ukendte voldsmænd«, som ødelagde filmene.
On leaving the building he was set upon by seven ‘unknown assailants’, who destroyed the films.
For at forsvare Yang gik Gao Zhisheng i sultestrejke i 48 timer.
In response, Gao Zhisheng undertook a 48-hour hunger strike (as did Ye Shuang), whilst other Chinese activists and democrats resident on the Chinese mainland, in Hong Kong, in Japan and in the West gradually joined the protest.
Ye Shuang deltog også i strejken, mens andre kinesiske aktivister og demokrater, som bor på det kinesiske fastland, i Hongkong, i Japan og i Vesten efterhånden har sluttet sig til protesten, herunder også Qi Zhiyong, som måtte have sine ben amputeret, efter at politiet skød mod ham under demonstrationerne på Den Himmelske Freds Plads i 1989.
The protesters included Qi Zhiyong, who had his legs amputated after the police fired at him during the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations.
Hvad agter Rådet på baggrund af ovenstående at gøre for at bringe den kinesiske regering til at indstille disse forfølgelser og sikre trosfrihed?
What action is the Council intending to take in order to ensure that the Chinese Government ceases the kind of persecution described above and upholds freedom of worship?
Agter Rådet at stå fast på respekten for menneskerettighederne og sætte den i centrum for Den Europæiske Unions forbindelser med Folkerepublikken Kina?
Is the Council intending to ensure that respect for human rights is made the central issue in the EU's relations with the People's Republic of China?
EU har foretaget gentagne henvendelser om den skæbne og behandling, der bliver Gao Zhisheng og personer, der har forbindelse til hans sag, til del.
The EU has carried out repeated demarches on the fate and treatment of Gao Zhisheng and persons connected to his case.
Menneskerettighederne er centrale spørgsmål i EU's forbindelser med Kina.
Human rights are central issues in the EU's relations with China.
EU vil fortsat give udtryk for sine betænkeligheder ved forfølgelse af enkeltpersoner, fordi de fredeligt udtrykker deres mening eller tro, og øve pres for at få dem frigivet.
The EU will continue to raise its concerns regarding the persecution of individuals on the grounds of peacefully expressing their opinion or belief and press for their release.
Næste runde i dialogen mellem EU og Kina om menneskerettigheder vil bl.a. fokusere på ytringsfrihed og retfærdig rettergang.
The next round of the EU‑China human rights dialogue will focus inter alia on freedom of expression and fair trial.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0716/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0716/06
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen på baggrund af ovenstående at træffe for at bringe den kinesiske regering til at indstille disse forfølgelser og sikre trosfrihed?
What action is the Commission considering with a view to persuading the Chinese Government to cease the kind of persecution described above and to uphold freedom of worship?
Agter Kommissionen at stå fast på respekten for menneskerettighederne og sætte den i centrum for Den Europæiske Unions forbindelser med Folkerepublikken Kina?
Is the Commission intending to ensure that respect for human rights is made the central issue in the EU's relations with the People's Republic of China?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0717/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0717/06
Om: Reduceret momssats for arbejdsintensive tjenesteydelser
Subject: Reduced VAT rate for labour-intensive services
Nedsættelse af momssatsen for arbejdsintensive tjenesteydelser kan ikke hindre, at sådanne tjenesteleverandører med bopæl i grænseområder risikerer at miste kunder til tjenesteleverandører i nabolande, hvor momssatsen er endnu lavere.
The lowering of the VAT rate for labour-intensive services cannot prevent the situation where providers of such services who live in border areas risk losing customers to service providers in neighbouring countries whose VAT rate is lower still.
Dette gælder f.eks. frisører i det belgiske grænseområde (hvor der ikke gælder en reduceret momssats) og Nederlandene (hvor der anvendes en reduceret sats).
This is true, for example, of hairdressing services in the border area between Belgium (where there is no reduced rate) and the Netherlands (where there continues to be a reduced rate).
Erkender Kommissionen dette?
Does the Commission acknowledge that this is the case?
Hvilke argumenter vil den i benægtende fald anføre for at afvise dette? —
If not, what reasons can it put forward for denying it? —
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil den i bekræftende fald iværksætte for at imødegå dette?
If so, what steps does it intend to take to remedy the situation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-0718/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0718/06
Om: De europæiske institutioners og lignende aktørers bygninger
Subject: Buildings of the European institutions and other EU bodies
Kan Rådet give en oversigt – med angivelse af adresse – over de bygninger, som det benytter i hovedstadsregionen Bruxelles?
Can the Council provide an overview — with addresses — of the buildings that it occupies in the Brussels Capital Region?
Kan Rådet for hver lokalitets vedkommende oplyse, om det er ejer eller lejer eller bruger på andre vilkår?
Can it state in the case of each building whether it owns it, rents it or occupies it under another arrangement?
Kan Rådet ligeledes for hver enkelt bygnings vedkommende oplyse, hvilke skatter og afgifter (ejendomsskatter osv.) det betaler til de lokale myndigheder (kommune, region)?
Can the Council also say what taxes (property tax etc.) it pays to the local authorities (commune, region), broken down by premises?
Nedenfor følger de oplysninger, som det ærede parlamentsmedlems har forespurgt om, samt en oversigt.
The Honourable Member will find below the information that he has requested, together with a table.