natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Påtænker Rådet at tage sagen op til drøftelse med Erdogan?
Is the Council considering tackling Mr Erdoğan on this?
Rådet minder det ærede parlamentsmedlem om, at det normalt aldrig udtaler sig om regerings­chefers offentlige erklæringer eller om artikler i pressen.
The Council would remind the Honourable Member that it is the Council's practice never to comment on public statements by Heads of Government, or press articles.
For så vidt angår Rådets tilsagn om at fortsætte kampen mod enhver form for forskelsbehandling, især inden for rammerne af kandidatlandenes tiltrædelsesforberedelser, henviser Rådet det ærede medlem til alle de svar, det allerede har givet på spørgsmål om dette emne, især svaret på Q H‑0183/05 fra María Valenciano Martínez-Orozco under anden mødeperiode i april 2005 i Strasbourg og svaret på QE-P1115/05, som han selv har stillet.
As for the Council's pledge to continue to combat all forms of discrimination, in particular in the context of the preparation of candidate countries for accession, the Council would refer the Honourable Member to all the replies it has already given on this subject, especially those given to Q H-0183/05 put by María Valenciano Martínez-Orozco at the plenary part-session in April 2005 in Strasbourg and to QE-P1115/05 which he himself put.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1122/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1122/05
Om: It som skolefag i Spanien
Subject: IT as a school subject in Spain
Den 24. januar 2005 offentliggjorde Kommissionen beretningen fra den spanske Eurydice-enhed, der indgik i publikationen »Key Data on Information and Communication Technology in Schools in Europe - 2004 Edition«.
On 24 January 2005 the Commission made public the report from the Spanish unit of Eurydice, included in the document ‘Key data on Information and Communications Technology in Schools in Europe’ - 2004 edition.
Heri konkluderes det, at ikt (informations- og kommunikationsteknologi) er et obligatorisk fag i Spanien.
The report concludes that ICT (Information and Communications technology) is a compulsory subject in Spain.
Det argument, der fremføres er, at faget »teknologi« er obligatorisk i Spanien, selv om indholdet heraf langt fra svarer til det, Kommissionen definerer som ikt.
The argument put forward is that ‘technology’ is a compulsory subject in Spain, although its content is far from being the same as what the Commission defines as ‘ICT’.
I virkeligheden er det eneste fag, som reelt har et ikt-indhold, »informática«, og det er ikke obligatorisk i Spanien.
In actual fact the only subject whose content really includes ICT is ‘informatics’, which is not compulsory in Spain.
I henhold til den spanske undervisninglovgivnings bekendtgørelse af 9.9.1993 (offentliggjort i det spanske statstidende BOE af 21.9.1993, s. 27419) fremgår det, at fagområdet »teknologi« intet har at gøre med ikt, samtidig med at det af bekendtgørelse af 1.2.1996 (offentliggjort i BOE af 13.2.1996, s. 5112) fremgår, at fagområdet »informática« fuldt ud dækker ikt.
In Spanish legislation on education, the Order of 9 September 1993 (page 27419 of the Official Spanish Gazette (BOE) of 21 September 1993) shows that the speciality ‘technology’ has nothing to do with ICT, and furthermore the Order of 1 February 1996 (page 5112 of the Official Spanish Gazette of 13 February 1996) shows that the speciality ‘informatics’ fully covers ICT.
Af ovenstående kan det udledes, at ikt indgår i alle fag i Spanien, at der er ikt-indhold i eller at ikt er en del af andre fag, men ikke at dette fag (uanset om det kaldes »informática«, informationsteknologi, informations- og kommunikationsteknologi, nye teknologier eller noget helt andet) findes som et obligatorisk og selvstændigt fag.
All this means that whilst we can say that ICT is included in all subjects in Spain, that there is an ICT content or that ICT forms part of other subjects, it is not a compulsory and separate subject in itself (be it called informatics, information technologies, information and communications technology, new technologies, etc).
Hvad er Kommissionens udgangspunkt for at adskille begrebet »informática« fra begrebet »ikt« og kæde sidstnævnte sammen med begrebet »teknologi« inden for sekundærundervisningen i Spanien?
What is the Commission’s basis for separating the term ‘informatics’ from the term ‘ICT’ and linking the latter with ‘technology’ in the context of the Spanish secondary school system?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1123/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1123/05
Om: Kinesiske tekstilers oversvømmelse af europæiske markeder - hvilke initiativer tager EU?
Subject: Invasion of the European market by Chinese textiles: what initiatives will the EU take?
Kinesisk eksport af tekstilvarer og beklædningsgenstande til Den Europæiske Union er i den første måned efter afskaffelsen af kvoter gradvist steget med 46,5 %.
In the first month since the removal of the quotas, the total volume of Chinese textile and clothing exports to the EU rose by 46.5%.
Den europæiske tekstilindustrisammenslutning Euratex har anmodet EU om at gribe ind i henhold til artikel 241 i protokollen om Kinas tiltrædelse af WTO, som gør det muligt for et medlem af denne organisation at træffe beskyttelsesforanstaltninger for at begrænse stigningen i den kinesiske eksport i tilfælde af unormale handelsforstyrrelser.
The European textile industry association Euratex has called on the EU to intervene under Article 241 of China's protocol of access to the WTO, which allows a WTO member to take safeguard measures to limit the growth of Chinese exports should there be an unusual disturbance of trade.
Ovennævnte anmodning støttes af data, hvoraf det fremgår, at der i 12 specifikke kategorier har været tale om en stigning i eksportmængden til 15 EU-lande på 625 % og samtidig om et prisfald på 36 % i nogle sektorer.
This request is backed up by data showing, for twelve specific categories, a growth in the volume of exports to fifteen EU Member States of 625% and, at the same time, a reduction in prices in some sectors of 36%.
Hvilke presserende initiativer agter Rådet at fremme for så vidt angår denne situation, som risikerer at få katastrofale følger for små og mellemstore europæiske virksomheder i tekstil- og beklædningsbranchen?
What measures will the Council take, as a matter of urgency, to deal with a situation which threatens to have catastrophic consequences for the EU's textile and clothing SMEs?
Det ærede medlem spørger, hvilke foranstaltninger Rådet vil træffe som følge af EU's øgede import af tekstilvarer og beklædningsgenstande fra Kina.
The Honourable Member asks what measures the Council will take in view of the increase of Chinese imports of textile and clothing in the EU.
Rådet skal som svar på denne forespørgsel påpege, at i henhold til gældende fællesskabslovgivning påhviler det først og fremmest Kommissionen at skride ind.
The Council would point out in reply to this question that according to the existing Community legislation it is first and foremost up to the Commission to act in this regard.
Kommissionen har konkluderet, at der foreligger tilstrækkeligt bevis til at berettige, at der indledes en undersøgelse vedrørende de pågældende varekategorier.
The Commission has concluded that there is sufficient evidence to justify the initiation of an investigation in relation to the product categories concerned.
Kommissionen har iværksat en under­søgelse for at fastslå, om det er berettiget at anvende de specifikke beskyttelses-foranstaltninger vedrørende tekstilvarer for disse varekategorier (jf. EUT C 104 af 29.4.2005).
The Commission has initiated an investigation to determine whether the application of textile specific safeguard measures in relation to those product categories is warranted (see OJ C 104 of 29.04.2005 ).
For to varekategorier (4 og 115) var der tilstrækkeligt bevis for, at der er sket markedsforstyrrelser.
For two product categories (4 & 115) there was enough evidence that market disruption has occurred.
Kommissionen har derfor forelagt medlemsstaterne et forslag om formelt samråd med Kina om ovennævnte kategorier, og Tekstiludvalget har godkendt forslaget.
Therefore, the Commission submitted a proposal to the Member States for formal consultation with China on the abovementioned categories and the Textiles Committee has approved the proposal.
Som svar på det bredere spørgsmål om udløbet af aftalen om tekstilvarer og beklædningsgenstande (ATC), herunder navnlig spørgsmålet om importen fra Kina og dens konsekvenser, skal Rådet hen­vise det ærede medlem til besvarelserne af følgende forespørgsler: —
As to a reply to the broader question of the expiry of the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC), in particular the issue of Chinese imports, and its consequences, the Council would refer the Honourable Member to the answers given to the following Parliamentary questions: —
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1124/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1124/05
Hvilke presserende initiativer agter Kommissionen at fremme for så vidt angår denne situation, som risikerer at få katastrofale følger for små og mellemstore europæiske virksomheder i tekstil- og beklædningsbranchen?
What measures will the Commission take, as a matter of urgency, to deal with a situation which threatens to have catastrophic consequences for the EU's textile and clothing SMEs?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1125/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1125/05
Om: Forbud mod kurdiske folkesange
Subject: Ban on Kurdish folksongs
Efter en kort proces har en retsinstans i Diyarbakir i Tyrkiet for nylig truffet afgørelse om at forbyde markedsføring af kurdiske musikkassettebånd med sange af kendte kurdiske folkesangere såsom Xeyro Abbas, Aynur Dogan, Ozan Kawa og andre.
In summary proceedings, a court in Diyarbakir, Turkey, recently decided to ban the distribution of Kurdish cassette tapes featuring songs by such famous Kurdish folksingers as Xeyro Abbas, Aynur Dogan and Ozan Kawa, amongst others.
De 81 præfekter i regionen har fået til opgave at gennemføre denne retsafgørelse.
The 81 Prefects in the region were instructed to implement that court decision.
Det tyrkiske kulturministerium havde imidlertid givet tilladelse til markedsføring af disse kassettebånd.
The Turkish Ministry of Culture had, however, authorised the sale of the tapes.
Forbudet er nu indført med det vage påskud, at disse folkesange »gør propaganda for en terroristorganisation«.
The ban has now been implemented on the vague pretext that the folksongs constituted the dissemination of propaganda on behalf of a terrorist organisation.
Er Kommissionen bekendt med denne retsafgørelse, som går stik imod den tyrkiske regerings løfte om at give det kurdiske mindretal sprogrettigheder?
Is the Commission aware of this court decision, which manifestly breaches the Turkish Government's pledge to grant linguistic rights to the Kurdish minority?
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at den tyrkiske regerings vedvarende afvisning af den kurdiske identitet - Tyrkiet tolererer end ikke, at dyr i Tyrkiet har kurdiske eller armenske betegnelser - udgør en varig hindring i forhandlingsprocessen om Tyrkiets optagelse i EU?
Does not the Commission feel that the Turkish Government's persistent denial of Kurdish identity - Turkey does not even allow animals in Turkey to bear Kurdish or Armenian names! - constitutes an ongoing hindrance in the negotiations for Turkish accession to the EU?
Vil Kommissionen over for den tyrkiske regering slå til lyd for, at dette forbud, som er en klar tilsidesættelse af princippet om ytringsfrihed - og dermed de grundlæggende rettigheder - , snarest muligt bliver omstødt?
Will the Commission make representations to the Turkish Government and call on it to repeal as soon as possible this ban which constitutes a manifest breach of the principle of freedom of expression and, hence, of fundamental rights?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1130/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1130/05
Om: Løn og pension til EU-personale
Subject: EU staff salary and pension levels
Folk i Den Tjekkiske Republik har ønsket oplysninger fra mig som MEP om EU-personalets pensionsordning og den byrde, den medfører for EU's budget.
People in the Czech Republic have approached me as an MEP with questions concerning the EU staff pension scheme and the burden which it places on the EU budget.
Hvor stort et samlet beløb udgør i øjeblikket udbetalingerne til pensionerede EU-tjenestemænd?
What is the total amount currently paid out to retired EU officials?
Hvor stor er EU-tjenestemænds pension i gennemsnit?
What is the average value of an EU official's pension?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1131/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1131/05
Om: Socialforsikringsorganisationers solidaritetskonto
Subject: Social security organisations' solidarity account
Med lov nr. 2084 fra 1992 oprettedes socialforsikringsorganisationernes solidaritetskonto i Grækenland.
The social security organisations' solidarity account (LAFKA) was introduced in Greece by Law 2084/1992.
Loven fastsatte et nånedligt bidrag til denne konto på 1%-5% af pensionerne i den private og offentlige sektor for at dække forsikringskassernes gæld over for den daværende minister for social sikring.
The law prescribes monthly contributions to the above fund of between 1% and 5% of pensions for both the private and the public sector, at the discretion of the Minister for Social Security at the time, in order to cover debts incurred by social security organisations.
Den 19. januar 2004 erklærede den græske revisionsret det for at være forfatningsstridigt at tilbageholde disse beløb, idet det var i modstrid med menneskerettighedskonventionen, dog uden at der blev truffet definitiv afgørelse i sagen.
On 19 January 2004 the State Audit Council ruled that the deduction was unconstitutional on the grounds that it contravened the Convention on Human Rights, without however giving a final ruling.
Tilbageholdelsen af beløbene blev afskaffet den 1. juli 2004.
The deduction was abolished by a law adopted on 1 July 2004.
I betragtning af, at sagen endnu ikke er definitivt afgjort, og eftersom beregningen af de ulovligt tilbageholdte bidrag vil tage en vis tid, og at en lignende praksis måske vil blive fulgt i fremtiden, bedes Kommissionen besvare følgende: Mener Kommissionen, at det er i overensstemmelse med fællesskabslovgivningen at tilbageholde det ovennævnte beløb fra pensionisterne?
Given that no final ruling has been given in this case, that the calculation of retroactive payments of illegally deducted contributions will take some time, and that similar practices may be repeated in the future, does the Commission believe that the deduction of the above amounts from pensioners was compatible with Community law?
Hvis ikke, inden hvornår skal de tilbageholdte beløb så være tilbagebetalt?
If not, by when should the amounts deducted be repaid?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1132/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1132/05
Om: Folkedrab og etnisk udrensning af religiøse minoriteter i Bangladesh
Subject: Genocide and ethnic cleansing of the religious minorities in Bangladesh
Siden Indien blev delt i 1947 er procentdelen af religiøse mindretal i Bangladesh faldet fra 40% til 10%.
It is stated that the percentage of religious minorities in Bangladesh has dropped from 40% to 10% since the partition of India in 1947.
Det hævdes, at nogle mindretal har lidt under systematisk politisk og religiøs forfølgelse fra ekstreme islamiske fundamentalisters side, herunder voldsomme overgreb mod civile og ødelæggelse af deres ejendomme, ødelæggelse af religiøse bygninger, overgreb mod kvinder, nedbrænding af landsbyer og opkrævning af en skat for »tvivlere«.
It has been alleged that some minorities have experienced systematic political and religious persecution by extreme Islamic fundamentalist forces, including violent attacks on people and property, destruction of places of worship, attacks on women, burning of villages, and the collection of an ‘infidel’ tax.
Har Kommissionen undersøgt disse påstande?
Has the Commission investigated these allegations?
Er de korrekte?
Are they true?
Vil Kommissionen udtale sig i denne sag og oplyse, hvilke foranstaltninger den eventuelt har truffet?
Will the Commission make a statement on the matter and indicate what action, if any, has been taken?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1133/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1133/05
Om: Planer om et kerne-Europa
Subject: Plans for a core Europe
Ifølge en publikation fra direktøren for Centre for European Reform i London, Charles Grant, med titlen »What happens if Britain votes No?« skal der i EU findes en hemmelig plan, der går ud på at etablere et kerne-Europa på ni politiske områder, hvis briterne ved folkeafstemningen skulle stemme nej til forslaget til europæisk forfatning.
According to a publication entitled ‘What Happens If Britain Votes No?’ by the Director of the Centre for European Reform in London, Charles Grant, a secret plan has been prepared within the EU which projects a scenario for launching a core Europe, based on nine policy areas, if, in the British referendum, the draft European Constitution is rejected.
I dette kerne-Europa skulle også Belgien og Luxembourg indgå, lige som andre, ikke nærmere specificerede EU-medlemsstater.
Belgium and Luxembourg are also supposedly involved in this core Europe (as are other, unidentified EU Member States).
Charles Grant hævder, at der også er planer om en europæisk straffedomstol, harmonisering af skatter og afgifter og sammenlægning af ambassader.
According to Charles Grant, a European Criminal Court, tax harmonisation and the merging of embassies are also planned.
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte eller afvise oplysningerne fra Centre for European Reform i London?
Can the Commission confirm or deny the reports by the Centre for European Reform in London?
Hvilke instanser og politikere har været inddraget i udarbejdelsen af disse planer?
What bodies and politicians were involved in drawing up these plans?
Hvor længe varede drøftelserne?
How long did consultations last?
Hvor fandt de sted?
Where did they take place?
Hvem tog initiativet?
Where did the initiative originate?
Hvis disse oplysninger er korrekte, kan Kommissionen da give nærmere oplysninger om denne hemmelige plan?
If the reports are correct, can the Commission provide more documentation and clarification concerning this secret plan?
Finder Kommissionen ikke, at et sådant kerne-Europa vil stride imod ånd og bogstav i forfatningstraktaten?
Does the Commission not take the view that such a core Europe would conflict with the spirit and letter of the Constitutional Treaty?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1134/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1134/05
Om: EU-fiskefartøjer i Sydøstasien
Subject: EU fishing vessels for South-East Asia
Kan Kommissionen bekræfte sine kontakter med Rio Praaning, og kan den oplyse, om der kan opnås indsigt i dette dossier?
Can the Commission confirm its contacts with Mr Praaning, and can it say whether the relevant records can be consulted?
Hvorledes vil Kommissionen forklare dette samarbejde på et tidspunkt, hvor dossieret først skulle godkendes af Europa-Parlamentet og vedtages i Rådet (fiskeri)?
What is the Commission's explanation for this collaboration at a time when the European Parliament still had to give its approval and the Council (Fisheries) still had to pass the legislation?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1135/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1135/05
Om: Forældede pesticider i Georgien
Subject: Obsolete pesticides
Tæt ved den georgiske by Kakheti, midt blandt store vingårde, ligger der på et areal på over 1 ha efter et første skøn (mindst) 50 til 60 t forældede og skadelige pesticider i fri luft.
Over an area of more than 1 ha in the middle of large vineyards near the Georgian town of Kakheti, at least 50 to 60 tonnes of obsolete and harmful pesticides (according to an initial estimate) are deteriorating.
I fugtige perioder trænger stofferne lige ned i jorden, i tørre perioder blæser de bort med vinden.
During wet periods, the pesticides easily penetrate the soil; when it is dry, they are blown away by the wind.
Ifølge det georgiske miljøministerium findes der mange af disse forfaldne oplagringspladser for pesticider, der udgør en alvorlig trussel for mennesker og miljø.
According to the Georgian Ministry for the Environment, there are many such dumps for decaying pesticides, which are a serious threat to individuals and the environment.
I svaret på forespørgsel E-1951/02 EUT C 28 E af 6.2.2003, s. 159. lader Kommissionen forstå, at de nye uafhængige stater (NIS) ikke til Kommissionen har indgivet nogen direkte ansøgning om finansiering af projekter, der vedrører gamle pesticider.
In reply to Written Question No E-1951/02 OJ C 28 E, 6.2.2003, p.
På den anden side angiver Kommissionen, at »Hvis der udtrykkes behov herfor, har Kommissionen dog flere instrumenter til sin rådighed for at fremme og finansiere bortskaffelsen af denne type affald i disse lande«.
159 . , the Commission indicated that from the New Independent States (NIS) no explicit requests for funding projects related to the problem of obsolete pesticides had reached it, but that ‘nevertheless, when the need is expressed, the Commission can apply several instruments to promote and fund the disposal of this type of waste in these countries’.
Har Kommissionen nu modtaget en sådan anmodning fra Georgien, og vil den i bekræftende fald allokere bevillinger til at bidrage til destruktion af dette farlige affald?
Has the Commission received such a request from Georgia in the meantime and, if so, will it allocate funding, if appropriate, to help destroy what is hazardous waste?
Vil Kommissionen på mere struktureret vis afsætte midler til også mere generelt at hjælpe landene i Kaukasus-området og NIS-staterne med bæredygtig destruktion af deres lagre af gamle pesticider, således at fødevare- og sundhedskriser kan forhindres?
More generally, will the Commission make funding available in a more structured fashion so as to give specific assistance to the countries of the Caucasus, and the NIS in general, for the permanent destruction of their stockpiles of obsolete pesticides, with a view to preventing food and health crises?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1136/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1136/05
Om: Udtalelser fra EP's formand om EU's forfatning
Subject: Comments by the President of the European Parliament on the European Constitution
Torsdag den 10. marts holdt alle tilstedeværende medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet i Strasbourg ét minuts stilhed for at mindes ofrene for det islamiske attentat den 11. marts 2004, der krævede næsten 200 uskyldige menneskers liv.
On Thursday, 10 March 2005 in the European Parliament in Strasbourg, all MEPs present observed one minute's silence in tribute to the victims of the Islamic terrorist attack on 11 March 2004, which claimed the lives of close to 200 innocent people.
Ved den lejlighed holdt formanden for Parlamentet, den spanske socialist Josep Borrell, en tale, hvori han bl.a. gik ind for, at Europa skulle være mere åbent over for fænomenet indvandring.
On that occasion the President of Parliament, Spanish socialist Josep Borrell, gave a formal address in which he inter alia advocated that Europe should adopt a more open attitude towards immigration.
EP's formand har naturligvis den fulde frihed til at udtrykke sin mening som politiker om dette spørgsmål.
The President of Parliament is perfectly free, of course, to voice his opinion on this as a politician.
Er Josep Borrells holdning også Kommissionens officielle holdning?
Is Josep Borrell's position the Commission's official position?
Finder Kommissionen ikke, at sådanne udtalelser - hvor Josep Borrell misbruger sin stilling - på et tidspunkt, hvor der forberedes folkeafstemninger i flere medlemsstater, på utilstedelig vis påvirker den demokratiske nationale debat?
Does not the Commission take the view that, at a time when referenda are being prepared in various Member States, such comments - with Josep Borrell abusing his office - improperly influence democratic national debate there?
Vil Kommissionen anmode EP's formand om fremover at afholde sig fra sådanne stærkt følelsesladede udtalelser, der langt fra støttes af et flertal af EP's medlemmer?
Will the Commission call on the President of Parliament to refrain from making such emotionally charged comments in future which are by no means endorsed by a majority of MEPs?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-1138/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1138/05