natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mere konkret drejer det sig om, at medarbejdere ved USA's terrorbekæmpelsesenheder skal have fået adgang til alle de finansielle oplysninger, der er registreret af SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications), som er en europæisk baseret, brancheejet samarbejdsorganisation for næsten 8000 forretningsbanker i over 200 lande.
More specifically, US counterterrorism officials apparently obtained access to all financial records from the international banking cooperative based in Europe called the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT), an industry-owned cooperative associated with nearly 8000 commercial banks in more than 200 countries that use its services.
Alle europæiske banker bruger SWIFT, når de skal overføre penge til andre banker på såvel internationalt som nationalt plan.
All European banks are using SWIFT in order to effectuate bank-to-bank money transfers around the world both at international and national levels.
SWIFT ligger inde med data fra de millioner af elektroniske pengeoverførsler og andre økonomiske transaktioner, som finder sted hver dag.
SWIFT manages data from millions of wire transfers and other monetary transactions each day.
Ifølge amerikanske embedsmænd er der til dato foretaget titusindvis, måske hundredtusindvis af søgninger.
According to US officials, ‘at least tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of searches’ have been undertaken to date.
Det er også kommet frem, at i hvert fald den belgiske centralbank kendte til TFTP.
It has also been revealed that at least the Central Bank of Belgium knew about the TFTP.
Kommissionen bedes på den baggrund besvare følgende spørgsmål.
Given the above, the Commission is asked the following.
Er Kommissionen klar over, om stærkt følsomme personoplysninger i tilknytning til pengeoverførsler henhørende under EU's eller dets medlemsstaters kompetence er blevet udleveret til de amerikanske myndigheder uden de berørte personers viden og uden behørig tilladelse fra de nationale domstole eller andre kompetente myndigheder?
Does the Commission know if highly sensitive personal data linked to financial transfers under the competence of the European Union or its Member States have been provided to the US administration without the knowledge of the persons concerned or appropriate authorisation by national judicial or other competent authorities?
I lyset af, at den frie bevægelighed for kapital henhører under Fællesskabets eksklusive kompetence, har den amerikanske regering, EU's medlemsstater eller Den Europæiske Centralbank da informeret Kommissionen om det amerikanske initiativ?
Given that freedom of movement of capital is an exclusive Community competence, did the US Government, the EU Member States or the European Central Bank inform the Commission about the US initiative?
Hvis ja, hvorfor har Kommissionen da ikke orienteret Europa-Parlamentet?
If yes, why hasn’t the Commission informed the European Parliament?
Er behandlingen af sådanne oplysninger i strid med de europæiske databeskyttelsesregler som fastlagt af medlemsstaterne, Europarådet eller EU?
Does the processing of these data infringe the European data protection rules as defined at national, Council of Europe, and European Union level?
I henhold til hvilken lov, myndighed eller international aftale har de amerikanske myndigheder i bekræftende fald fået adgang til et europæisk baseret selskabs database?
If so, under which law, authority or international agreement has the US administration been provided access to the database of a Europe‑based company?
Kan Kommissionen give en redegørelse for den institutionelle kontrol med SWIFT på europæisk og nationalt plan samt for den rolle, der spilles af SWIFT's tilsynsråd (Oversight Council), som i hovedsagen er sammensat af medlemsstaternes centralbanker og Den Europæiske Centralbank?
Could the Commission give an explanation concerning the institutional control of SWIFT at European and national level and the role of the oversight council of SWIFT, composed in its majority by central banks of Member States and the European Central Bank?
Hvordan vil den nye europæiske rammelovgivning vedrørende oplysninger om indbetaler ved pengeoverførsler (COD/2005/0138 - betænkning af Alvaro), som for tiden behandles under den fælles beslutningsprocedure, indvirke på de amerikanske myndigheders aktiviteter?
What will be the impact of the new European legal framework on ‘information on the payer accompanying transfers of funds’ (COD/2005/0138 — Alvaro Report), presently being negotiated under the codecision procedure, on the activities of the US administration?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3074/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3074/06
Ifølge de seneste rapporter udgør det samlede antal fordrevne i Burma omkring 17000 , hvoraf 8000 skulle være karenere.
Recent reports estimate the total number of displaced people in Burma to be approximately 17000 , of which 8000 are said to be Karen.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3075/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3075/06
Om: Skydning af den brune bjørn
Subject: Killing of the bear Bruno
Den 26. juni blev bjørnen »Jj2« efter ordre fra miljøministeren skudt i Bayern.
On 26 June in Bavaria the two-year-old bear ‘Jj2’, was killed at the order of the Environment Ministry.
Den løsning, myndighederne i Bayern valgte, ville ikke have været nødvendig, hvis man havde sørget for at bedøve dyret, således at det kunne leveres tilbage til Adamello Brentas forening.
The steps taken by the Bavarian authorities would have been unnecessary had the animal been sedated so as to make it easier to return it to the Adamello Brenta association.
Kan Kommissionen endvidere henvende sig til myndighederne i Bayern for at få tilbagebetalt de udgifter, foreningen og Den Europæiske Union har haft med henblik på gennemførelse af projektet »Life Ursus«, som bør kunne fortsætte under sikre forhold?
not agree that the Bavarian authorities should reimburse the costs incurred by the association and the Union in connection with the ‘Life Ursus’ project, which should be given the guarantees it requires in order to continue?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3076/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3076/06
For de MON810-sorter, der anvendes i Tyskland, findes der ingen gyldig godkendelse af markedsføring i henhold til lovgivningen om genteknik.
MON810 varieties used in Germany currently do not have valid marketing authorisation under genetic engineering legislation.
Der foreligger kun en fransk godkendelse for sorter af MON810, men denne gælder imidlertid ikke for de sorter, der nu dyrkes i Tyskland.
Only French authorisation of varieties obtained from MON810 exists, and this does not apply to varieties grown in Germany.
Hvad er i denne sammenhæng Kommissionens kommentar til, at MON810-såsæden ikke er korrekt registreret som udgangsmateriale til fremstilling af levnedsmidler, således at den oprindelige godkendelse kan bevare sin gyldighed?
What does the Commission have to say, in this connection, regarding the fact that MON810 seed has not been properly notified as a source material for the production of food in order for the original authorisation to remain in effect?
Er Kommissionen ikke enig i, at markedsføring af MON810-såsæd er omfattet af de aktuelle forskrifter i forordning (EF) nr. 1829/­2003 om genetisk modificerede fødevarer og foderstoffer, da MON810-majs ganske vist dyrkes til produktion af fodermidler, men da det ikke med sikkerhed kan udelukkes, at reproduktive MON810-GMO også kan finde vej til produktionen af levnedsmidler?
Does the Commission agree that, in order for MON810 seed to be placed on the market, the current provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed must apply, as, although MON810 maize is grown for feed production, the possibility cannot be completely ruled out that MON810 GMOs which are able to propagate may also find their way into food production?
Hvorledes planlægger Kommissionen at sikre den nødvendige gennemførelse af en kontrol af levneds- og fodermidler, der kræves i forordning (EF) nr. 1829/­2003, men som endnu ikke var nødvendig efter den ret, der var gældende på tidspunktet for godkendelsesproceduren for MON810?
How does the Commission intend to ensure that the food and feed safety assessment required under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, which was not yet required under the law applying at the time of the authorisation procedure for MON810, is carried out?
Hvorledes vil Kommissionen hindre registrering af de sorter af MON810, der anvendes i Tyskland i den fælles liste over sorter?
Will the Commission be preventing the entry of MON810 varieties used in Germany in the common catalogue of varieties?
Og hvorledes vil Kommissionen sikre, at registreringerne i fællesskabsregistret — navnlig den senere registrering den 11.7.2005 — korrigeres, for så vidt angår MON810?
And will the Commission be seeing to it that entries in the Community register — in particular the additional entry of 11 July 2005 — are corrected with regard to MON810?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3077/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3077/06
Om: Religionsfrihed i Belarus
Subject: Religious freedom in Belarus
Har Kommissionen kendskab til påstandene om regeringens nylige indskrænkning af religionsfriheden i Belarus?
Is the Commission aware of the alleged governmental recent restriction of religious freedoms in Belarus?
Der kan nævnes følgende eksempler på denne indskrænkning: Den 26. maj opløste byretten i Minsk den kristelige reformerede baptistkirke og erklærede den ulovlig i henhold til religionsloven fra 2002.
As examples of this restriction: on 26 May Minsk City Court liquidated Christ's Covenant Reformed Baptist Church, thus rendering it illegal under the 2002 Religion Law.
Tidligere på året afsonede kirkens præst, Georgi Vyazovsky, en fængselsstraf på 10 dage for at have holdt gudstjeneste for den 30 personer store menighed i sit hjem.
Earlier this year the church's pastor, Georgi Vyazovsky, served a 10‑day prison term for leading the 30‑strong congregation in worship at his own home.
Sergey Shavtsov, en menneskerettighedsadvokat, blev arresteret den 24. marts 2006 og sat i fængsel for at have organiseret et religiøst arrangement, en fælleskirkelig konference, uden tilladelse fra regeringen.
Sergey Shavtsov, a human rights lawyer, was arrested on 24 March 2006, and jailed for organising a religious event, an interdenominational conference, without government permission.
Sergei Kopytov, som er offentlig anklager i det østlige Belarus, påstås at have advaret en børnehavemusiklærer, Lyudmila Izakson-Bolotovskaja om, at hun risikerede retsforfølgelse for at have fejret en jødisk helligdag med jødiske børn, idet han skal have anklaget hende for »ulovlig og forsætlig udbredelse af religiøse dogmer til små børn« i et brev dateret den 17. april.
Sergei Kopytov, a public prosecutor in eastern Belarus, allegedly warned a kindergarten music teacher Lyudmila Izakson-Bolotovskaya that she risked prosecution for celebrating a Jewish religious holiday with Jewish children, allegedly accusing her of ‘illegal and deliberate dissemination of religious dogma to young children’ in a letter dated the 17 April.
Den 1. juni påstås tre evangeliske kristne at have modtaget officielle advarsler for at have deltaget i en 24 timers vagt på den centrale plads i Brest, hvor deltagerne tavst læste biblen som udtryk for solidaritet med de demonstranter, der var blevet arresteret op til præsidentvalget i marts.
On the 1 June, three evangelical Christians were allegedly given official warnings for taking part in a 24‑hour vigil in Brest's central square, during which they silently read the Bible as an expression of solidarity with demonstrators arrested in the wake of March's presidential elections.
Sådanne indskrænkninger af religiøs ytringsfrihed fra myndighedernes side sker ofte under henvisning til belarussisk ret.
Such restriction of religious expression on the part of the authorities is often based on Belarusian law.
De tre ovenfor nævnte evangeliske kristne blev f.eks. arresteret på grundlag af artikel 167 i loven om administrative overtrædelser, som kræver statslig tilladelse til religiøse arrangementer, selv om de afholdes uden for et særligt kultsted.
The three evangelical Christians mentioned above, for instance, were arrested under Article 167 of the Administrative Violations Code, which requires state permission for religious events if they are held outside a designated house of worship.
Artikel 193 straffer ligeledes »organisering eller ledelse af en forening, der krænker personer eller borgernes rettigheder« med bøde, fratagelse af retten til at udøve visse hverv eller aktiviteter, eller med arrest i op til seks måneder.
Similarly Article 193 punishes ‘organisation or leadership of an association infringing upon the person or rights of the citizen’ with a fine, deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities, or arrest for up to six months.
Artikel 25 i religionsloven fra 2002 indskrænker de belarussiske borgeres ret til at mødes privat til gudstjeneste.
Article 25 of the 2002 Religion Law restricts the right of Belarusian citizens to meet privately for worship.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3078/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3078/06
Om: Udbetaling af pension — EF-Domstolens Griesmar-dom af 29. november 2001
Subject: Payment of a pension —‘Griesmar’ judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 29 November 2001
Under henvisning til den såkaldte Griesmar-dom, som De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol afsagde den 29. november 2001, har en fransk statsborger med bopæl på fransk område påberåbt sig ret til at få ændret sin pension hos den franske forvaltning.
On the basis of the ‘Griesmar’ judgment delivered by the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 29 November 2001, a person with French nationality and residing on French territory has asserted his right to revision of a retirement pension vis-à-vis the French administration.
Det var blevet fastslået, at den pågældende artikel i den franske pensionslov (L.12 i code des pensions civiles et militaires) er i modstrid med princippet om lige løn til mænd og kvinder, således som det er fastsat i Rom-traktaten og de efterfølgende traktater.
Article L.12 of the French law on civil and military pensions was ruled in this judgment to be contrary to the principle of equal pay for men and women enshrined in the Treaty of Rome and subsequent treaties.
Den øverste franske forvaltningsret Conseil d'État har imidlertid ment, at bestemmelserne i nævnte artikel er forenelige med ligelønsprincippet, således som det er fastsat i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union.
The French Council of State, for its part, took the view that the provisions of the abovementioned article were incompatible with the principle of equal pay as set out in the Treaty on European Union.
I hvilken udstrækning kan den nævnte EF-­dom have juridisk forrang frem for den nationale lovgivning?
This being the case, to what extent can the abovementioned European judgment take precedence over national law?
Hvilken lære skal den europæiske borger drage af disse to modstridende afgørelser?
What is the European citizen to make of these two contradictory decisions?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3079/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3079/06
af Albert Maat (PPE-DE) og Camiel Eurlings (PPE-DE)
by Albert Maat (PPE-DE) and Camiel Eurlings (PPE-DE)
Om: Den foruroligende situation i Syrien og følgerne for EU's indvandrings- og asylpolitik
Subject: Alarming situation in Syria and consequences for the EU's migration and asylum policy
Torsdag den 15. juni 2006 vedtog Europa-Parlamentet en beslutning om Syrien ( P6_TA(2006)0279 ).
On Thursday, 15 June 2006, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on Syria ( P6_TA(2006)0279 ).
Her fængsles menneskerettighedsaktivister, journalister og politikere stadig oftere uden at være stillet for en dommer.
Increasingly often, human rights activists, journalists and politicians are being imprisoned in that country without due process.
Og presset mod etniske og religiøse mindretal øges.
Repression of ethnic and religious minorities is also increasing.
Disse forhold påvirker også situationen for syriske statsborgere, der er flygtet til EU's medlemsstater, men sendes tilbage til oprindelseslandet.
These circumstances also affect the situation of Syrian nationals who have fled to EU Member States but are sent back to their country of origin.
Anser Rådet stadig denne tilbagesendelsespolitik for acceptabel?
Does the Council still consider such a return policy justifiable?
Er Rådet rede til at tage initiativ til en bedre koordinering af den europæiske politik for indvandring af, asyl til og tilbagesendelse af syriske statsborgere?
Will the Council take the initiative to improve the coordination of European policy on immigration, asylum and the deportation of Syrian nationals?
Rådet følger nøje menneskerettighedssituationen i Syrien.
The Council is following closely the human rights situation in Syria.
Formandskabet udsendte på Den Europæiske Unions vegne en offentlig erklæring den 19. maj 2006, hvori det gav udtryk for EU's bekymring over behandlingen af menneskerettighedsforkæmpere, deres familier og politiske aktivister.
The Presidency, acting on behalf of the European Union, issued a public statement on 19 May 2006 expressing the EU's concern at the treatment of human rights defenders, their families and of political activists.
EU-trojkaen tager regelmæssigt såvel disse anliggender som situationen for de etniske minoriteter op med de syriske myndigheder.
The EU troika regularly raises both these matters and the situation of the ethnic minorities with the Syrian authorities.
Det ærede parlamentsmedlem gøres dog opmærksom på, at det er medlemsstaterne, der skal undersøge asylansøgninger og afgøre, hvorvidt der kan indrømmes flygtninge- eller anden beskyttelsesstatus, og som således tillader ansøgerne at opholde sig på deres område.
However, the attention of the Honourable Members is drawn to the fact that it is for the Member States to examine applications for asylum and decide whether to grant refugee or subsidiary protection status, thus allowing the applicants to stay in their territory.
Medlemsstaterne skal sætte de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft for at efterkomme dette direktiv inden den 10. oktober 2006.
Member States are required to adapt their legislation, regulations and administrative provisions as necessary to comply with this directive before 10 October 2006.
Desuden bør det — dog ikke med hensyn til tilfælde af ansøgninger om international beskyttelse — bemærkes, at Rådet i øjeblikket behandler et forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv om fælles standarder og procedurer i medlemsstaterne for tilbagesendelse af tredjelandsstatsborgere med ulovligt ophold KOM(2005)0391 endelig af 1.9.2005. .
Moreover, and apart from cases of applications for international protection, it should be noted that Council is currently examining a proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive on common standards on procedures in Member States for returning illegally resident third-country nationals COM(2005)391 final of 1.9.2005. .
Formålet med dette forslag er at indføre klare, gennemsigtige og retfærdige fælles regler for tilbagesendelse, udsendelse, anvendelse af tvangsforanstaltninger, midlertidig frihedsberøvelse og genindrejse, idet de pågældende personers menneskerettigheder og grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder respekteres fuldt ud.
The objective of this proposal is to provide for clear, transparent and fair common rules concerning return, removal, use of coercive measures, temporary custody and re-entry, while fully respecting the human rights and fundamental freedoms of the persons concerned.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3080/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3080/06
af Albert Maat (PPE-DE) og Camiel Eurlings (PPE-DE)
by Albert Maat (PPE‑DE) and Camiel Eurlings (PPE‑DE)
Anser Kommissionen stadig denne tilbagesendelsespolitik for acceptabel?
Does the Commission still consider such a return policy justifiable?
Er Kommissionen rede til at tage initiativ til en bedre koordinering af den europæiske politik for indvandring af, asyl til og tilbagesendelse af syriske statsborgere?
Will the Commission take the initiative to improve the coordination of European policy on immigration, asylum and the deportation of Syrian nationals?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3081/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3081/06
Om: Indsendelse af dokumenter til EU af personer, der stammer fra den besatte del af Cypern
Subject: Submission of documents to the EU by persons originating from the occupied part of Cyprus
Det blev for nylig afsløret, at datteren af lederen af det okkuperende styre på Cypern, Mehmet Ali Talat, blev rekrutteret som trainee (stagiaire) af Eurostat i Luxembourg.
It was recently revealed that the daughter of the head of the occupying regime in Cyprus, Mehmet Ali Talat, was recruited as a trainee (stagiaire) by Eurostat in Luxembourg.
Efter at dette kom frem i lyset, blev det rapporteret, at det pas, som hr. Talats datter indsendte til EU, ikke kom fra den uægte stat eller fra de officielle myndigheder på Cypern (som det skulle have gjort); det var tyrkisk.
After this came to light, it was reported that the passport which Mr Talat's daughter submitted to the EU services did not come from the pseudo-state, or from the official authorities of the Republic of Cyprus (as it should have been), but was Turkish.
Hvordan ser Rådet på det faktum, at datteren af repræsentanten for det okkuperende styre på Cypern indsendte et tyrkisk pas til en international organisation (som EU), som om den besatte del af Cypern (en EU medlemsstat) var en del af Tyrkiet?
How does the Council view the fact that the daughter of the representative of the occupying regime in Cyprus submitted a Turkish passport to an international organisation (such as the EU), as if the occupied part of Cyprus (an EU Member State) was part of Turkish sovereign territory?
Det tilkommer ikke Rådet at besvare det konkrete spørgsmål vedrørende ansættelse af en praktikant i en af Kommissionens tjenestegrene, f.eks. Eurostat.
It is not for the Council to reply to the specific question concerning the recruitment of a trainee by the Commission services, such as Eurostat.
Det Europæiske Fællesskab og dets medlemsstater minder imidlertid om, at Republikken Cypern blev medlem af Den Europæiske Union den 1. maj 2004.
However, the European Community and its Member States recall that the Republic of Cyprus became a Member State of the European Union on 1 May 2004.
De understreger, at de alene anerkender Republikken Cypern som et folkeretligt subjekt.
They underline that they recognise only the Republic of Cyprus as a subject of international law.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3082/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3082/06
Om: Verdenshandelsorganisationens handling og flersidige system
Subject: Action and multilateral system of the World Trade Organisation
EU har for nylig inden for rammerne af de plurilaterale forhandlinger sammen med andre medlemmer af WTO indgivet en kollektiv anmodning til visse udviklingslande om at åbne deres markeder for serviceydelser inden for energisektoren.
The EU, together with other members of the WTO, recently submitted, within the framework of plurilateral negotiations in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), a collective request to certain developed countries to open up their markets to services in the energy sector.
Men på baggrund af, at vigtige energiproducenter, som f.eks. Saudi Arabien, Rusland og Kasakhstan, enten for nylig blev medlem af WTO eller pt. er involveret i tiltrædelsesforhandlinger, vil Kommissionen så oplyse følgende:
However, given that important energy producers, such as Saudi Arabia, Russia and Kazakhstan, either recently joined the WTO or are currently engaged in accession negotiations; will the Commission say:
Mener Kommissionen, at det er sandsynligt, at de lande, som anmodningen om at liberalisere serviceydelser er rettet til, vil imødekomme den?
Does it see any likelihood that the countries which are addressees of the request to liberalise services in the energy sector accede to it?