natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Eneste artikel, litra a), i protokol nr. 8, knyttet til traktaten om Den Europæiske Union og traktaterne om oprettelse af De Europæiske Fællesskaber, om fastlæggelse af hjemstedet for De Europæiske Fællesskabers institutioner, fastsætter følgende: »Europa-Parlamentet har hjemsted i Strasbourg og afholder dér de tolv månedlige plenarmøderækker, herunder også budgetmøderækken.
According to paragraph (a) of the sole article of the eighth protocol, on the seat of the institutions, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaties establishing the European Communities, ‘the European Parliament shall have its seat in Strasbourg where the 12 periods of monthly plenary sessions, including the budget session, shall be held.
Yderligere plenarmøderækker afholdes i Bruxelles.
The periods of additional plenary sessions shall be held in Brussels.
Europa-Parlamentets udvalg holder deres møder i Bruxelles.
The committees of the European Parliament shall meet in Brussels.
Europa-Parlamentets Generalsekretariat og dets tjenester er fortsat placeret i Luxembourg.«
The General Secretariat of the European Parliament and its departments shall remain in Luxembourg.’
Der mindes om, at traktaterne, herunder denne protokol, er indgået og ratificeret af alle medlemsstater efter deres forfatningsmæssige procedurer.
It is recalled that the Treaties, including this protocol, have been concluded and ratified by all Member States through their constitutional procedures.
Enhver ændring af de nuværende bestemmelser om fastlæggelse af hjemstedet for institutionerne kræver en ændring af denne protokol nr. 8 i overensstemmelse med de procedurer, der gælder for ændring af traktaterne.
Any change in the current provisions governing the location of the seats of the institutions would require an amendment of the said eighth protocol in accordance with the procedures applicable for the amendment of the Treaties.
Fastlæggelsen af institutionernes hjemsted henhører ikke under Rådets, men under medlemsstaternes kompetence.
The determination of the seats of the institutions does not fall within the sphere of competence of the Council, but within that of the Member States.
Rådet erkender betydningen af deltagelsesdemokrati og vil gerne påpege, at Den Europæiske Unions borgere nyder forskellige rettigheder for så vidt angår det demokratiske liv i Den Europæiske Union.
The Council recognises the importance of participatory democracy and notes that citizens of the European Union enjoy various rights regarding the democratic life of the European Union.
Imidlertid udgør en initiativret for borgerne ikke et retligt instrument efter de gældende traktater, hverken med henblik på vedtagelse af en retsakt under den afledte ret eller en ændring af traktaterne.
However, a citizen's right of initiative does not constitute a legal instrument under the Treaties presently in force, either for initiating an act of secondary law or for amending the Treaties.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5134/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5134/06
Om: Kommissionens reaktion på modtagelse af 1 million underskrifter fra oneseat-kampagnen
Subject: Action by the Commission following the collection of one million signatures in the oneseat campaign
Hvordan agter Kommissionen at reagere på modtagelsen af 1 mio. underskrifter fra www.oneseat.eu-kampagnen den 21. september 2006 i Bruxelles?
How does the Commission intend to proceed after one million signatures collected in the www.oneseat.eu campaign were delivered in Brussels on 21 September 2006?
Europæiske borgere tilkendegiver fortsat dagligt, at de ønsker mere gennemsigtighed i EU, og de forventer et svar.
European citizens are continuing to vote daily for greater transparency in the EU and expect an answer.
Ved overdragelsen af underskrifterne blev det garanteret, at både spørgsmålet om Parlamentets hjemsted og tilladeligheden af borgerkrav skal debatteres.
When the signatures were delivered, confirmation was given that both the subject of Parliament's seat and the admissibility of citizens' initiatives would be considered.
Inden for hvilke rammer og hvornår vil Kommissionen debattere spørgsmålet om Parlamentets hjemsted?
In what context and when will the Commission discuss the issue of Parliament's seat?
I hvilken sammenhæng og hvornår vil Kommissionen behandle tilladeligheden af europæiske borgerkrav?
In what context and when will the Commission consider the admissibility of European citizens' initiatives?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5135/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5135/06
af Helga Trüpel (Verts/ALE)
by Helga Trüpel (Verts/ALE)
Om: Henstilling vedrørende privatkopiering
Subject: Private copying — recommendation
Hvilken (konkret) anledning er der til at arbejde på en henstilling, som beskæftiger sig med en fair betaling til ophavsmænd og kunstnere med hensyn til privatkopiering?
What (specific) grounds are there for drafting a recommendation concerning the fair compensation of authors and artists for the act of copying for private use?
Kan Kommissionen vurdere, om udviklingen efter den seneste henstilling (onlinesalg af musik) retfærdiggør anvendelsen af dette instrument i en yderligere sag?
Can the Commission state whether developments since the last recommendation (on online music services) justify further recourse to this legal instrument?
Hvis denne ordning skal ændres, hvorfor behandler Kommissionen ikke disse spørgsmål inden for rammerne af den planlagte gennemgribende revision af bestemmelserne om ophavsret, men som et separat element løsrevet fra det overordnede koncept i europæisk lovgivning inden for beskyttelse af ophavsret og ydelser?
If this provision needs to be amended, why has the Commission chosen not to address the issues in question in the context of a general review of copyright legislation but as a concern divorced from European copyright and performance rights legislation as a whole?
En henstilling tjener mere en kortsigtet politik.
A recommendation is better suited to a short-term policy.
Da artikel 5, stk. 2, litra b), behandler et system, som har udviklet sig igennem mange år i 20 EU-medlemsstater, kræver ethvert indgreb, enhver reform en afbalanceret høringsprocedure.
Since Article 5(2)(b) concerns a system that has developed in 20 EU Member States over many years, any reform thereof requires a balanced consultation process.
Hvorfor vil Kommissionen ikke involvere Rådet og Parlamentet i denne vanskelige procedure?
Why does the Commission prefer not to involve the Council and the European Parliament in this difficult process?
Foreligger der allerede tilstrækkelig viden, især i betragtning af den sene gennemførelse af direktiv 2001/­29/­EF EFT L 167 af 22.6.2001, s. 10 . i en række medlemsstater og den stadig ikke landsdækkende udbredelse af DRM-­systemer, til på nuværende tidspunkt at lede medlemsstaternes foranstaltninger i en bestemt retning, som ikke ubetinget skal bidrage til en afbalanceret sikring af rettighedsindehavernes interesser?
Taking into account the late transposition of Directive 2001/29/EC in a number of Member States and the fact that DRM systems are still not universally used, is there sufficient information to be able to steer national measures in a particular direction at the present time, even though this will not necessarily ensure equal protection of rightholders' interests?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5136/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5136/06
Om: Sharia-lovgivningen i Aceh-provinsen i Indonesien
Subject: Shar'iah Law in Aceh in province of Indonesia
Kan Kommissionen i lyset af den nylige indførelse af sharia-lovgivningen i Aceh-provinsen i Indonesien forsikre medlemsstaternes borgere om, at ingen økonomisk bistand fra EU er blevet eller vil blive brugt af sharia-militæret i forbindelse med håndhævelsen af sharia-lovgivningen i provinsen?
In light of the recent imposition of Shar'iah law in the Indonesian province of Aceh, can the Commission assure citizens of Member States that no financial assistance stemming from the EU has been or will be used by the Shar'iah militia, enforcing Shar'iah law in the province?
Hvad gør Kommissionen endvidere for at styrke de moderate indonesiske muslimers kamp mod de umenneskelige love, som krænker de internationalt anerkendte grundlæggende menneskerettigheder?
Furthermore, what is the Commission doing to strengthen the work of moderate Indonesian Muslims fighting the inhumane laws which violate internationally recognised fundamental human rights?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5137/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5137/06
Om: Overholdelse af menneskerettighederne i Iran
Subject: Issues of human rights in Iran
Hvad gør Kommissionen i lyset af den meget alvorlige trussel fra et iransk atomprogram for at sikre, at de grundlæggende menneskerettigheder ikke krænkes, mens denne situation behandles, navnlig iranernes ret til at konvertere fra islam til andre religioner?
In light of the very serious threat of an Iranian nuclear programme, what is the Commission doing to ensure that fundamental issues of human rights are not overlooked while dealing with the situation, in particular the rights of Iranians to convert from Islam to other religions?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5138/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5138/06
Om: Svindel med virksomhedsfortegnelser i EU
Subject: EU Company Directory scam
Er Kommissionen bekendt med, at der er fremsat klager over en organisation, der kaldes EU Company Directory, som følge af at virksomheder i Storbritannien og andre lande har modtaget krav om betaling for, at deres oplysninger er blevet optaget i virksomhedsfortegnelsen, uden at de har bedt om det?
Is the Commission aware of complaints having been made against an organisation called EU Company Directory, as a result of companies in the UK and elsewhere having received demands for money for inclusion of their details in the EU Company Directory which they have not ordered?
Hvilke råd kan Kommissionen give privatpersoner og virksomheder, som har modtaget sådanne betalingskrav?
What advice does the Commission have for individuals and companies who have received such demands for money?
Hvad agter Kommissionen at gøre for at tage fat på dette problem med virksomheder som f.eks. EU Company Directory, der vildleder virksomheder og efterfølgende stiller uacceptable krav om betaling?
What plans does the Commission have for addressing the problem of companies such as EU Company Directory who mislead companies and make subsequent and unacceptable demands for payment?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5139/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5139/06
Om: Den europæiske gendarmeristyrke
Subject: European Gendarmerie
Den 21. august 2006 skrev jeg et brev, som jeg sendte i kopi pr. e-­mail, til brigadegeneral Deanaz som ansvarlig for de europæiske gendarmeristyrker i Vicenza.
On 21 August 2006 I wrote by letter, and copied this by email, to Brigadier General Deanaz as head of the European Gendarmerie Force in Vicenza.
Jeg bad om besøgstilladelse til gendarmeriets hovedkvarter for mig selv og en lille gruppe af mit personale med henblik på at få en orientering om gendarmeriets fremskridt, aktiviteter og fremtidsplaner.
I requested a visit to the Gendarmerie HQ for me and possibly a small number of my staff in order to be briefed on the Gendarmerie's progress, activities and future plans.
Jeg bad om denne tilladelse i egenskab af medlem af Udvalget om Sikkerhed og Forsvar og som mit partis talsmand i Det Forenede Kongerige i spørgsmål, der vedrører sikkerhed, forsvar og indre anliggender.
I requested this in my capacity as a member of the Security and Defence Committee, and as my party's spokesman in the UK on Security and Defence and Home Affairs matters.
Jeg beklager at måtte sige, at jeg endnu ikke har modtaget svar.
Unfortunately I have not yet received a reply.
Er det acceptabelt, at en sådan forespørgsel fra et parlamentsmedlem ganske enkelt ignoreres?
Is it acceptable for such a request by a member of the Parliament to be simply ignored?
Er der mulighed for, at et sådant besøg kan finde sted?
Is it possible for such a visit to take place?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5140/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5140/06
Om: Jobusikkerhed for unge og praktikanter
Subject: The casualisation of young people and trainees
Der er i de senere år sket en foruroligende stor forandring af arbejdsmarkedet og en stigning i antallet af usikre job.
The breakdown of labour market structures and the development of casual work figure amongst the most worrying phenomena of recent years.
Det er især de unge, der berøres af disse forandringer.
Young people in particular have considerably suffered from these changes.
De har store vanskeligheder med at blive integreret på arbejdsmarkedet, hvilket kommer til udtryk i de exceptionelt høje arbejdsløshedstal blandt unge.
They meet with significant difficulties when attempting to integrate into the labour market, as attested to by the exceptionally high unemployment rates for this group.
Der er i stadig flere medlemsstater — især Tyskland, Belgien, Spanien, Frankrig og Italien samt i de europæiske institutioner — ved at blive udviklet et »parallelt praktikantmarked« ved siden af det normale arbejdsmarked.
In an increasing number of Member States — particularly in Germany, Belgium, Spain, France and in Italy, as well as at EU institution level — the development of a genuine ‘parallel trainee market’ alongside the normal labour market has become apparent.
Disse »erhvervspraktikpladser« er kendetegnet ved krav om et højt kvalifikationsniveau, arbejdsforhold, som ligger langt under minimumsstandarderne, meget skiftende arbejdstider, dårlig eller ingen løn, men med arbejdsopgaver og ansvar som i en normal stilling.
These ‘professional traineeships’ are characterised by the need for a high level of qualifications, working conditions which are considerably inferior to minimum social norms, poor pay, if indeed any, and tasks and responsibilities which are identical to those of a normal employee.
Der er kort sagt tale om normale job, der forklædes som praktikpladser for at undgå at betale en normal løn.
These traineeships are in fact genuine jobs in disguise, ‘labelled’ in this way so as to avoid having to pay a normal wage.
Hvordan forholder Kommissionen sig til dette fænomen?
What is the Commission's position vis-à-vis this phenomenon?
Har Kommissionen planer om at vedtage en fælles definition af begrebet praktikant med henblik på at sikre en tilfredsstillende anerkendelse af praktikanternes erhvervserfaring og overholde de rettigheder, som er fastsat i praktikanternes nationale lovgivninger, og som er i overensstemmelse med fællesskabslovgivningen?
Does the Commission intend to adopt a common definition of a ‘trainee’ in order to ensure equal recognition of professional experience and to ensure respect for the rights of trainees under national laws in compliance with EU legislation?
Har Kommissionen planer om at foretage en sammenlignende undersøgelse og kvalitative vurderinger af praktikanternes forhold i de lande, der har underskrevet Bologna-aftalen, der kan kaste lys over manglen eller misforholdene mellem visse definitioner, skaffe viden om, hvor mange job der er forklædt som praktikpladser, samt om de økonomiske og sociale konsekvenser og sætte gang i en europæisk debat om definitionen af en status for praktikanter for at forhindre, at denne uheldige praksis spreder sig til endnu flere europæiske stater?
Does the Commission intend to produce a comparative study and quantitative evaluations on the different statuses of ‘trainee’ existing within countries signatory to the Bologna agreements in order to take into account the absence and/or incompatibility of certain definitions, to recognise the importance of these de facto employees in a traineeship as well as all the resultant economic and social consequences, and to launch a debate at European level on the definition of a status, thus hindering the ‘traineeship drift’ in an increasing number of European Member States?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5141/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5141/06
af Ljudmila Novak (PPE-DE)
by Ljudmila Novak (PPE‑DE)
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om det i agenturerne, der finansieres af generaldirektoraterne, er tilfældet, at eksperter fra de (ti) nye medlemsstater og de (15) gamle har samme vilkår med hensyn til rekruttering, behandling og vederlag?
Do agencies financed by Commission directorates treat, include and pay experts from the 10 new Member States and the 15 old Member States on an equal basis?
Vil den i benægtende fald redegøre for grundene til denne diskriminering samt den juridiske baggrund herfor?
If there are any differences in the selection, treatment or payment of experts, could the Commission please provide an explanation and specify the legal basis for such differences.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5142/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5142/06
af Jens Holm (GUE/NGL) og Eva-Britt Svensson (GUE/NGL)
by Jens Holm (GUE/NGL) and Eva-Britt Svensson (GUE/NGL)
Om: Forfølgelse af det arabiske mindretal i Iran
Subject: Persecution of the Arab minority in Iran
Det arabiske mindretal i Iran er, som mange andre etniske grupper, udsat for alvorlig undertrykkelse.
The Arab minority in Iran is, in common with several other ethnic groups, subjected to severe repression.
Der har i meget lang tid levet et tæt sammentømret arabisk mindretal i den iranske provins Khuzestan.
A closely knit Arab minority has been living in the Iranian province of Khuzestan for a long time.
Dette mindretal bliver nu fordrevet og tvinges til at opgive sin arabiske identitet.
That minority is now being forcibly displaced and compelled to give up its Arab identity.
Forfattere, der skriver på arabisk, forfølges.
Arabic-language writers are subjected to persecution.
Efter summariske processer blev medlemmer af det arabiske mindretal henrettet den 2. marts efter at være blevet tvunget til at tilstå, at de havde deltaget i et bombeangreb.
Following summary trials, members of the Arab minority were executed on 2 March after being forced to confess that they had taken part in a bomb attack.
Disse processer blev fulgt af hundredvis af arrestationer.
Over a hundred arrests then followed.
På nuværende tidspunkt venter Abdullah Suleymani, Abdulreza Sanawati Zergani, Qasem Salamat, Mohammad Jaab Pour, Abdulamir Farjallah Jaab, Alireza Asakreh, Majed Alboghubaish, Khalaf Derhab Khudayrawi og Malek Banita mim på at blive henrettet efter at være blevet tvunget til at tilstå forbrydelser ved ulovlige retssager, hvor de sagsøgtes grundlæggende rettigheder, såsom retten til en forsvarsadvokat, blev overtrådt.
At present, Abdullah Suleymani, Abdulreza Sanawati Zergani, Qasem Salamat, Mohammad Jaab Pour, Abdulamir Farjallah Jaab, Alireza Asakreh, Majed Alboghubaish, Khalaf Derhab Khudayrawi, Malek Banita mim are awaiting execution after being forced to confess to crimes during unlawfully conducted proceedings, in which the defendants' elementary rights, such as the right to a defence lawyer, were not met.
Det iranske retssystem er forkasteligt.
The Iranian judicial system is beneath contempt.
Der benyttes tortur til at aftvinge tilståelser.
Torture is used to extract confessions.
Når det er fremtrædende personer, der tvinges til at tilstå, eller der skal statueres et eksempel, vises tilståelserne i fjernsynet.
When prominent people are forced to confess or an example is to be made of someone, the confessions are broadcast on TV.
Hvilke initiativer agter Rådet at tage for at overtale Den Islamiske Republik Iran til at stoppe forfølgelsen og diskrimineringen af det arabiske mindretal i landet?
What initiatives does the Council intend to take to persuade the Islamic Republic of Iran to put an end to the persecution of and discrimination against the Arab minority in that country?
Rådet er bekendt med de foruroligende nyheder om den gruppe mænd fra Irans arabiske mindretal, som menes at være i overhængende fare for at blive henrettet.
The Council is familiar with the worrying news concerning the group of men belonging to Iran's Arab minority who are believed to be at imminent risk of execution.
Den Europæiske Union fordømmer dødsstraf og arbejder på at få den helt afskaffet.
The European Union condemns the death penalty and is working for its abolition in all circumstances.
Rådet har i forbindelse med Iran fordømt brugen af dødsstraf, især det stigende antal henrettelser.
In the case of Iran, the Council has condemned the use of the death penalty, in particular the increasing number of executions.
EU rejser fortsat dette og andre presserende menneskerettighedsspørgsmål direkte over for Iran og i internationale organer, navnlig FN.
The EU keeps raising this and other pressing human rights issues directly with Iran and in international bodies, in particular the UN.
EU støttede et udkast til resolution fra FN's Generalforsamling om menneskerettighedssituationen i Iran, som opfordrede Iran til i lovgivning og i praksis at afskaffe offentlig henrettelse og andre former for henrettelse, der foretages i mangel på respekt for internationalt anerkendte garantier.
The EU co-sponsored a draft UN General Assembly resolution on the human rights situation in Iran that would call on Iran to abolish, in law and in practice, public executions and other executions carried out in the absence of respect for internationally recognised safeguards.
Rådet har desuden opfordret de iranske myndigheder til at sikre, at alle tilbageholdte får adgang til juridisk bistand.
Furthermore, the Council has called on the Iranian authorities to ensure access to legal counsel for all detainees.
Hvad angår det arabiske mindretals situation har Rådet rejst spørgsmålet om diskrimination af mindretal i Iran, herunder etniske mindretal, ikke blot direkte over for Iran, men også gennem FN.
As to the situation of the Arab minority, the Council has raised the issue of discrimination against minorities inside Iran, including ethnic minorities, directly with Iran but also through the UN.
Udkastet til resolution opfordrer bl.a. Iran til i lovgivning og i praksis at afskaffe enhver form for diskrimination mod personer, der tilhører mindretal, herunder araberne, til at sikre, at mindretallene får den samme adgang til uddannelse som alle iranere, og til at tage disse spørgsmål på en åben måde, der i fuldt omfang inddrager mindretallene selv.
The draft resolution calls on Iran inter alia to eliminate in law and in practice all forms of discrimination against persons belonging to minorities, including Arabs, to ensure that minorities' access to education be on a par with that of all Iranians and to address these matters in an open manner with the full participation of the minorities themselves.
Rådet havde set frem til den runde af menneskerettighedsdialogen mellem EU og Iran, der skulle finde sted i december 2006.
The Council had been looking forward to the round of the EU‑Iran human rights dialogue which was due for December 2006.
Selv om det var aftalt mellem parterne, besluttede Iran til sidst ikke at gå ind i dialogen.
Despite mutual agreement, Iran decided in the end not to engage in a dialogue.
EU er fortsat rede til at tage dialogen op og vil også fremover rejse påtrængende menneskerettighedsspørgsmål som det foreliggende over for de iranske myndigheder.
The EU remains willing to take up the dialogue, and will continue raise urgent human rights cases, such as this one, with Iranian authorities.
Menneskerettighedsspørgsmålene vil fortsat stå i centrum for EU's forbindelser med Iran.
Human rights concerns will remain at the centre of attention in EU's relations with Iran.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-5144/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5144/06
Om: Telefonopkald til formanden med det formål at »bøje reglerne«
Subject: Phone calls to the President ‘to bend the rules’