natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kontoret for fødevarer og veterinærspørgsmål under generaldirektoratet for sundhed og forbrugere, der bl.a. kontrollerer efterlevelsen af EU‑lovgivningens krav til fødevaresikkerhed og -kvalitet samt veterinær- og plantesundhedssektoren i EU, gennemførte i november 2009 tilsyn på svineopdrætsanlæg og kyllingefarme i Grækenland (DG SANCO 2009‑8243‑MR Final).
The Food and Veterinary Office of the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Policy, whose responsibilities include monitoring compliance with EU legislation regarding food safety and quality as well as animal veterinary and plant health in the European Union, carried out an inspection of pig and poultry farms in Greece in November 2009 (DG SANCO 2009-8243-MR Final).
Kontorets rapport konkluderer, at de ansvarlige myndigheder på lokalt plan stadig ikke anvender minimumskravene i tilstrækkelig grad, og nogle gange slet ikke.
Its report concludes that local authorities are still failing to comply properly, if at all, with minimum requirements in this respect.
Yderligere er de oplysninger, som de lokale myndigheder videregiver til den centrale ansvarlige myndighed om sine kontrolbesøg, og resultaterne heraf inkonsekvente og i nogle tilfælde upålidelige.
Furthermore, the information provided by the local authorities to the central authority regarding inspections and the findings thereof are inconsistent and in certain cases unreliable.
Hvilken tidsfrist har Grækenland for at efterleve de forslag, som Kommissionens ansvarlige kontor har fremsat (kapitel 8)? 2.
What is the deadline for compliance by Greece with the recommendations from the Commission office responsible (Chapter 8)? 2.
Hvilke korrigerende foranstaltninger er der fastsat i tilfælde af, at et medlemsland ikke afleverer en handlingsplan, der lever op til Kommissionens forslag?
What corrective measures are envisaged should a Member State fail to submit a plan of action to the Commission in response to its recommendations?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-3668/2010
Question for written answer E-3668/2010
Om: 112: tidlige varslingssystemer for borgerne
Subject: 112 number: early warning systems for citizens
Myndighedernes kommunikation med borgerne i tilfælde af akutte og/eller forestående alvorlige katastrofer (dvs. tidlig varsling eller varsling af borgerne) er emne for adskillige gældende direktiver Se f.eks.: direktivet om signalgivning i forbindelse med sikkerhed og sundhed under arbejdet (92/58/EØF), direktivet om kontrol med risikoen for større uheld med farlige stoffer (96/82/EF, Seveso-direktivet), direktivet om strålingsfare (89/618/Euratom), tilladelsesdirektivet (2002/20/EF), direktivet om vurdering og styring af risikoen for oversvømmelser (2007/60/EF), direktiverne om transport af farligt gods og direktivet om europæisk kritisk infrastruktur (2008/114/EF). og er gentagne gange blevet krævet af Parlamentet (se skriftlig erklæring 0100/2007, Parlamentets betænkninger om civilbeskyttelsesordningen og det finansielle civilbeskyttelsesinstrument Dok.
Communication of authorities with citizens in case of imminent and/or developing major emergencies or disasters (i.e. early warning or citizens alert) is provided for in several existing directives See for example: Directive on the safety and health signs at work (92/58/EEC); Directive on major chemical installations (96/82/EC; Seveso Directive); Directive on Radiological Emergencies (89/618/Euratom); Authorisation Directive (2002/20/EC); Directive on the assessment and management of floods (2007/60/EC); directives dealing with the transport of dangerous goods and Directive (2008/114/EC) on European Critical Infrastructure. and has been repeatedly requested by Parliament (see Written declaration 0100/2007, the Parliament reports on the Civil Protection Mechanism and the Civil Protection Financial Instrument Doc.
A6-0286/2006 , vedtaget den 24.10.2006, og A6‑0027/2006, vedtaget den 14.3.2006. samt flere beslutninger Se f.eks.: beslutning A5‑0381/2000 (trafiksikkerhed: hovedopgaver i EU), A6‑0390/2006 (styring af terrorisme), A6‑0286/2006 (Fællesskabets civilbeskyttelsesmekanisme), A6-0149/2006 (naturkatastrofer); A6-0027/2006 (beredskab og hurtig indsats i katastrofesituationer), P6_TA(2005)0334 (naturkatastrofer — brande og oversvømmelser), P6_TA(2005)0006 (flodbølgen i Det Indiske Ocean), P6_TA(2008)0304 (styrkelse af EU's katastrofeberedskab) og P6_TA(2006)0584 (terrorisme — forebyggelse, beredskab og konsekvensstyring). ).
A6-0286/2006 , adopted on 24.10.2006 and A6-0027/2006 , adopted on 14.3.2006. , as well as numerous resolutions See for example resolutions A5-0381/2000 (Priorities in EU road safety); A6-0390/2006 (Management of Terrorism); A6-0286/2006 (Community civil protection mechanism); A6-0149/2006 (Natural Disasters); A6-0027/2006 (Rapid response and preparedness instrument for major emergencies); P6_TA(2005)0334 (Natural disasters - fires and floods); P6_TA(2005)0006 (Tidal wave in the Indian Ocean), P6_TA(2008)0304 (Stepping up the Union's disaster response capacity) and P6_TA(2006)0584 (Prevention, Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism). ).
Der bør skelnes mellem tidlige varslingssystemer for borgerne og forskellige tidlige varslingssystemer for myndighederne, som afhænger af den relevante katastrofe (oversvømmelser, jordskred, sneskred, brande, flodbølger osv.).
Early warning systems for citizens should be distinguished from various early warning systems for authorities which depend on the hazard involved (floods, landslides, avalanches, fires, tidal waves, etc.).
Da Parlamentet foreslog at oprette et tidligt varslingssystem for borgerne i forbindelse med omarbejdningen af civilbeskyttelsesmekanismen, blev det ikke accepteret af Kommissionen og Rådet, fordi de anså det for at høre ind under telekommunikationsområdet.
When the establishment of an early warning for citizens was clearly proposed by Parliament in the context of the recasting of the Civil Protection Mechanism, it was not accepted by the Commission and the Council because it was considered as falling within the scope of telecommunications.
Der blev derefter fremsat et lignende ændringsforslag i forbindelse med revisionen af forsyningspligtdirektivet, men dette blev ikke accepteret, fordi det blev anset for at høre under civilbeskyttelse.
A similar amendment proposal was then made in the context of the revision of the Universal Service Directive but was not accepted because it was considered as falling within the scope of Civil Protection.
Hvornår vil Kommissionen fremsætte passende lovforslag om udvikling af et generelt, flersproget, forenklet og effektivt system til varsling af borgerne om akutte eller forestående katastrofer i EU under hensyntagen til alle involverede risici og politikker, som krævet i skriftlig erklæring 0100/2007 om tidlig varsling af borgerne i tilfælde af større ulykker og katastrofer (underskrevet af 432 MEP'er)?
When will the Commission present the ‘appropriate legislative proposals for the establishment of a general, multilingual, simplified and efficient system for alerting citizens about imminent or developing emergencies in the EU, by taking into account all the risks and policies involved’ as requested in Written Declaration 0100/2007 on early warning for citizens in major emergencies (signed by 432 MEPs)?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-3669/2010
Question for written answer E-3669/2010
Om: Præcisering af EU's regler for magtanvendelse for militære fartøjer i anti-piratoperationer
Subject: Clarification of the EU's rules of engagement for military vessels involved in anti-piracy operations
Som Rådet ved, har den vigtige internationale skibsfart ud for Somalias kyst været hårdt ramt, hvilket alt for ofte på tragisk vis har kostet menneskeliv.
As the Council will be aware, there has been considerable disruption to vital international shipping off the coast of Somalia, which has all too frequently led to tragic loss of life.
Deres helbredstilstand menes at være dårlig, og de er stadig ikke blevet frigivet.
Their medical condition is believed to be poor and they have still not been released.
Parret blev holdt til fange om bord i et stykke tid, før en ny gruppe pirater kom for at tage dem med.
The couple were held on board for some time before a second group of pirates arrived to remove them.
Dengang hævdede den britiske regering, at den ikke kunne forhindre, at de blev taget med til Somalia, men der fremkom hurtigt rapporter om, at et britisk krigsskib var til stede og så, at den anden gruppe pirater kom, men var forhindret i at gribe ind af frygt for anklager om krænkelse af menneskerettighederne ved de britiske domstole, fordi der ikke var ubestridelige beviser for, at personerne i båden rent faktisk var pirater, selv om det var helt tydeligt for alle, at de var.
At the time, the British Government claimed that it had been powerless to prevent them from being taken to Somalia, but reports soon emerged suggesting that a British warship was on hand to observe the arrival of the second group but was prevented from taking action for fear of human rights challenges in the UK courts in the absence of incontrovertible proof that the individuals in the arriving boat were, indeed, pirates, even though it was perfectly clear to all concerned that they were.
Det var heller ikke klart, hvorvidt det pågældende krigsskib opererede i henhold til EU‑støttede regler for magtanvendelse for Operation Atalanta, som er en anti-piratmission under den fælles sikkerheds- og forsvarspolitik ud for Afrikas Horn.
It was also unclear whether the warship in question was operating under any EU‑sponsored rules of engagement applicable to Operation Atalanta, which is a CSDP anti-piracy mission off the Horn of Africa.
Har EU en fælles udenrigspolitisk holdning til pirateri, og er det blevet overvejet at bede Storbritannien og Frankrig om at fremsætte et forslag i Sikkerhedsrådet om at oprette en udelukkelseszone omkring Afrikas Horn for at forbyde brugen af hurtige motorbåde og give de øverstbefalende bemyndigelse til at træffe de foranstaltninger, de mener, er nødvendige (herunder indtrængen i Somalias farvand) for at beskytte både menneskeliv og skibsfarten?
Does the EU have a common foreign policy position with regard to piracy, and has any consideration been given to the idea of asking Britain and France to propose a motion in the Security Council that would create an exclusion zone around the Horn of Africa to prohibit the use of fast motor launches and which would authorise the commanders of duly authorised warships to take whatever action they deemed necessary (including incursions into Somali waters) in order to protect both life and shipping?
EU søger fortsat at bekæmpe pirateri ud for Somalias kyst hovedsagelig gennem FSFP-operationen EUNAVFOR Somalia, hvis vigtigste opgaver er at sørge for sikker levering af humanitær bistand til Somalia og beskytte sårbare fartøjer.
The EU continues to seek to combat piracy off the coast of Somalia mainly through the CSDP operation ‘Eunavfor Somalia’, whose main missions are to ensure the safe delivery of humanitarian aid to Somalia and to protect vulnerable shipping.
Det fartøj, som det ærede medlem henviser til, stod ikke under operation Atalantas kommando.
The ship referred to by the Honourable Member was not under the command of Operation Atalanta.
EU er medlem af Den Internationale Kontaktgruppe vedrørende Sørøveri ud for Somalias Kyst, inden for hvilken det sammen med internationale partnere søger at finde en langsigtet løsning på pirateriproblemet.
The EU is a member of the International Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia (CGPCS), in which framework it is seeking, together with international partners, a longer-term solution to piracy.
Den internationale kontaktgruppe er gennem sin retlige arbejdsgruppe et forum, hvor ethvert forslag, f.eks. det, som det ærede medlem foreslår, kan drøftes.
The CGPCS, through its Legal Working Group, is the forum for discussion of any proposal such as that suggested by the Honourable Member, to combat piracy.
Ethvert sådant initiativ skal efterleve retsstatsprincipperne og have den nødvendige kapacitet til at sikre, at det kan håndhæves.
Any such initiative would have to respect the rule of law and have the necessary capabilities to ensure its enforcement.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-3670/2010
Question for written answer E-3670/2010
Om: Valutakonvertibilitet og gensidige eller kompenserende foranstaltninger i WTO
Subject: Currency convertibility and reciprocal or compensatory measures within the WTO
Vil Kommissionen oplyse om Kinas handels- og investeringsbalance (synlige og usynlige poster) med EU for 2009, og mener Kommissionen nu, at det var en fejl at lade Kina (eller ethvert andet land) komme med i WTO uden først at tillade fuld konvertibilitet for landets valuta?
Can the Commission indicate China's trade and investment balance (visibles and invisibles) with the EU for 2009, and does the Commission now believe that it was a mistake to allow China (or any other country) to join the WTO without first permitting full convertibility of its currency?
Kan Kommissionen acceptere, at Kina systematisk har arbejdet for at sikre, at landets valuta blev undervurderet, for at fremme eksporten, og at fordelene ved fri handel, som er teoretisk til stede i henhold til teorien om komparative fordele, fordrejes voldsomt, eller endda ophæves, af sådanne kunstige valutavurderinger?
Does the Commission accept that China has systematically contrived to ensure the undervaluation of its currency to boost exports and that the benefits from free trade that are held to operate at a theoretical level by the Law of Comparative Advantage are severely distorted, if not negated, by such artificial currency valuations?
Desuden udviser EU vilje til at håndtere klimaændringerne ved at indføre et emissionshandelssystem, som vil øge omkostningerne ved varer og tjenesteydelser produceret i EU.
In addition, the EU is demonstrating its commitment to tackling climate change by introducing an Emissions Trading System (ETS), which will increase the cost of EU manufactured goods and services.
Kina har indtil videre afslået at tilslutte sig et sådant system, hvilket vil betyde, at Kinas produkter vil have en komparativ fordel i forhold til EU's produkter.
China has so far declined to join such a scheme, which will put its products at a comparative advantage to those of the EU.
På trods af, at han var stor fortaler for den frie handels idealer, mente Adam Smith, ligesom EU, at det var berettiget at beskytte visse sektorer, herunder landbrug og forsvar.
Despite his pronounced support for the ideals of free trade, Adam Smith, like the EU, believed in the legitimacy of protecting particular sectors, notably agriculture and defence.
Afgifter, som har til formål at begrænse indvirkningerne af klimaændringer, synes at være et godt eksempel herpå.
Taxes designed to limit the effect of climate change would appear to be just such an example.
Hvis Kina nægter at tilslutte sig emissionshandelssystemet, kan EU så i henhold til de gældende WTO‑regler lægge kompenserende afgifter på Kinas import, og i bekræftende fald, vil Kommissionen da indføre sådanne afgifter?
If China refuses to join a carbon trading scheme, do current WTO rules permit the EU to apply compensatory duties on Chinese imports, and, if so, will the Commission impose them?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-3671/2010
Question for written answer E-3671/2010
Om: Mulig interessekonflikt for revisionsfirmaer, der anbefaler administrationsprocedurer til virksomheder med økonomiske vanskeligheder
Subject: Potential conflict of interest for accountancy firms recommending administration procedures for companies in financial difficulty
Keith Elliot klagede til Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW), som er en faglig organisation for revisorer i England og Wales, der regulerer sine egne medlemmer, over en mulig interessekonflikt.
Mr Elliott complained to the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW), the professional body that regulates its own members, about a potential conflict of interest.
Det er ikke overraskende, at Keith Elliot og andre forretningsfolk, som er ofre for den økonomiske krise, ikke kan slæbe et stort revisionsfirma i retten, og den kendsgerning, at kun tre ICAEW-medlemmer blev straffet i 2008, tyder på, at selvreguleringen ikke virker.
Unsurprisingly, Mr Elliott and other businessmen who are victims of the recession are in no position to take large accountancy firms to court, and the fact that in 2008 only 3 ICAEW members were disciplined suggests that self-regulation is not working.
Den britiske regering har nægtet at oprette en ombudsmand for konkurs.
The British Government, for its part, has refused to create an Insolvency Ombudsman.
Har Kommissionen beføjelse til at lovgive på dette område, og hvis det er tilfældet, mener den da, at der skal gribes ind over for sådanne interessekonflikter?
Does the Commission have power to legislate in this area, and, if so, does it believe that such conflicts of interest need to be eliminated?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-3672/2010
Question for written answer E-3672/2010
Om: Diskriminerende sprogkrav i forbindelse med ansættelse
Subject: Discriminatory language requirements in employment
Der fremkom for nyligt rapporter i den britiske presse om, at en leverandør til et af landets førende supermarkeder havde besluttet at kræve, at alle jobansøgere kunne tale polsk, fordi al personalets sundheds- og sikkerhedsuddannelse kun afholdes på polsk.
Reports surfaced recently in the British press regarding a decision by a supplier to one of Britain's leading supermarkets to require job applicants to speak Polish on the grounds that all health and safety training of staff was carried out only in that language.
En officiel talsmand for regeringen havde tilsyneladende udtalt, at det kunne være muligt at retsforfølge arbejdsgiveren i henhold til loven om raceforhold fra 1965.
An official government spokesman was reported as saying that a prosecution might be possible under the Race Relations Act of 1965.
Et krav om, at man kan tale sproget i det land, hvor man arbejder, vil i de fleste tilfælde være helt rimeligt.
A requirement to speak the language of the country in which one works will, in most cases, be entirely reasonable.
Et krav om, at man skal kunne tale eller kommunikere på et fremmedsprog, skal kun kunne stilles i ekstraordinære situationer.
A requirement to speak or communicate in a foreign language needs to be justified for exceptional situations only.
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-3673/2010
Question for written answer E-3673/2010
Om: Præcisering af anvendelsen af EU's emissionshandelssystem inden for luftfart
Subject: Clarification on the application of the EU Emission Trading System to aviation
Som Kommissionen anførte i sit svar på forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E‑5283/09, vil luftfarten blive underlagt EU's emissionshandelssystem fuldstændigt den 1. januar 2012, og enhver stigning i luftfartssektoren vil skulle opvejes af en reduktion i emissionerne fra andre sektorer, f.eks. fremstilling.
As the Commission indicated in its answer to Written Question E‑5283/09, aviation will be fully covered by the EU Emission Trading System by 1 January 2012 and any increase from the aviation sector would have to be offset by a reduction in emissions from other sectors such as manufacturing.
Vil Kommissionen præcisere, hvordan luftfartsemissionerne vil blive beregnet?
Can the Commission clarify how aircraft emissions will be calculated?
Især med hensyn til om det vil være afgangsstedet eller ankomststedet, som vil udgøre beregningsgrundlaget for et lands emissioner?
In particular, will it be the point of departure or the point of arrival which will determine the basis of calculation for a particular country's emissions?
Hvis et fly flyver fra New York til Shanghai og stopper i London Heathrow på vejen, vil alle emissionerne fra New York til London da blive udelukket fra EU's emissionshandelssystem, mens alle emissionerne fra London til Shanghai vil blive lagt over på Det Forenede Kongerige?
In the case of a flight that departs from New York for Shanghai and stops at London Heathrow en route, will all the emissions from New York to London be excluded from the EU Emission Trading System but all the emissions from London to Shanghai be allocated to the UK?
Og vil beregningerne ændres, hvis ingen passagerer stiger på i Heathrow til Shanghai-delen af rejsen?
In addition, would the calculations be affected were no passengers to embark at Heathrow for the Shanghai leg of the journey?
Forespørgsel til skriftlig besvarelse E-3674/2010
Question for written answer E-3674/2010
Om: Bekymringer over fremtiden for tobaksdyrkningen i EU
Subject: Concerns over the future of tobacco growing in the European Union
Den 16. juni 2003 undertegnede Det Europæiske Fællesskab rammekonventionen om tobakskontrol (FCTC), som derefter blev ratificeret den 30. juni 2003.
On 16 June 2003 the European Community signed the framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and ratified it on 30 June 2003.
Siden da har Fællesskabet deltaget i FCTC-processen.
Since then, it has participated in the FCTC process.
FCTC har nedsat arbejdsgrupper, hvor konventionens parter behandler politiske henstillinger om gennemførelsen af traktaten.
The FCTC has established working groups in which parties to the Convention elaborate on policy recommendations for the implementation of the Treaty.
Dette omfatter udarbejdelse af ikkebindende retningslinjer.
This includes the development of non-binding guidelines.
EU er en central aktør i FCTC-arbejdsgruppen om artikel 9 og 10.
The EU is a key facilitator in the FCTC Working Group on Articles 9 and 10.
Forslag til retningslinjer fra denne arbejdsgruppe vil munde ud i lovgivningsmæssige henstillinger, der kan få alvorlige konsekvenser for EU's tobaksdyrkeres levebrød.
Guideline proposals from this working group will result in regulatory recommendations that may have a severe impact on the livelihood of EU tobacco growers.
Hvordan agter Kommissionen at sikre, at en henstilling fra denne arbejdsgruppe ikke forværrer de allerede vanskelige betingelser for tobaksdyrkerne i EU's medlemsstater?
How is the Commission going to ensure that any recommendation resulting from this working group will not negatively affect the already difficult conditions of tobacco growers in the European Member States?
Canadas nylige ændringer til tobaksloven, som forbyder de traditionelle blandede cigaretter, har skabt en unødvendig handelshindring, da det faktisk udgør et forbud mod import af Burley- og Oriental-tobak.
Canada's recent amendment to the Tobacco Act that bans traditional blended cigarettes has created an unnecessary obstacle to trade as it has de facto banned the import of Burley and Oriental tobacco.
Hvis der blev vedtaget tilsvarende lovgivning i EU, ville det sætte en stopper for al tobaksdyrkning i EU.
If similar legislation were to be adopted in the EU it would put an end to tobacco growing in the European Union.
I lyset af de alvorlige økonomiske udfordringer, som tobaksdyrkningssektoren allerede står over for i EU i dag, og den økonomiske krise, som forværrer tobaksdyrkernes levevilkår yderligere, har Kommissionen da til hensigt at føre en mere rimelig reguleringspolitik i EU?
Given the imminent economic challenges the tobacco growing sector is already confronted with today in the EU, and the worsening effect of the economic crisis on the livelihoods of tobacco farmers, is the Commission's intention to pursue a more proportionate regulatory policy in the EU?
Hvad mener Kommissionen om den nye lovgivning i Canada, som har indført et forbud mod produktion og salg af traditionelle blandede cigaretter, som indeholder smagsstoffer og andre ingredienser, og som udgør en teknisk handelshindring for Europas traditionelle blandede tobaksprodukter?
What is the Commission's view regarding recent legislation passed in Canada that has prohibited the manufacturing and sales of traditional blended cigarettes which contain flavouring additives and other ingredients and which represent a technical barrier to trade for European traditionally blended tobacco products?