natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvilke konklusioner kan Kommissionen drage ud fra den procentdel af befolkningen, der er forsikret gennem det offentlige sundhedssystem og dette systems andel af de samlede udgifter til sygeforsikring?
What conclusions can be drawn by the Commission from the percentage of the population insured under the state system and the share of this system in total health expenditure?
Hvor attraktiv er den offentlige sygeforsikring i Europa?
How attractive are public health insurance schemes in Europe?
Hvordan mener Kommissionen, at de planlagte EU-regler (f.eks. tjenesteydelsesdirektivet) vil indvirke på medlemsstaternes sundhedssystemer?
In the Commission's opinion, what impact will the planned European rules (for example the services directive) have on Member States' healthcare systems?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvilke sundhedstjenesteydelser allerede i dag primært bliver valgt ud fra det indre markeds udbud, og hvilke sundhedstjenesteydelser stadig har stærke regionale bånd?
What health services are, in the Commission's view, currently already widely being selected from among the range offered by the EU single market, and what health services still have strong regional links?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3312/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3312/05
Om: Sport på internettet og mobiltelefoni
Subject: Sport on the Internet and mobile telephony
Efter sagen med Bosman og arbejdstagernes frie bevægelighed i medlemsstaterne er fodbolden nu igen blevet genstand for konfrontationer mellem Det Europæiske Fodboldforbund (UEFA) og EU's konkurrenceudvalg.
After the Bosman case concerning freedom of movement of workers in the Member States, football once again finds itself at the centre of a dispute between UEFA (the Union of European Football Associations) and the EU's competition committee.
Denne gang har UEFA gjort fælles sag med FIFA (Det Internationale Fodboldforbund), FIBA (basket), volley, håndbold og hockey på græsplæne.
This time, UEFA is accompanied by FIFA (the Fédération Internationale de Football Association), and FIBA (basketball), together with the international federations for volleyball, handball and hockey.
Den afgørelse fra de internationale forbund, der er i modstrid med direktivet »fjernsyn uden grænser«, vedrører udsendelsen af sportsbegivenheder og -billeder med henblik på enten information eller underholdning på internettet eller gennem mobiltelefoni fra 2006.
The international federations' decision to oppose the ‘Television without frontiers’ directive relates to the transmission of sporting events and highlights, either as information or as entertainment, over the Internet or by mobile telephony from 2006.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om den inden for rammerne af konkurrencen og det frie marked har ført forhandlinger og drøftelser, og om der er indgået aftaler med myndighederne og de berørte organer i medlemsstaterne?
Can the Council say whether, in the context of competition and the free market, negotiations and exchanges of views have been held and agreements made with the authorities and relevant bodies of the Member States?
Er de internationale forbunds afgørelse bindende for EU på informationsområdet?
Is the international federations' decision binding on the EU in the information sector?
Indeholder den sikkerhedsventiler for de involverede parter, i dette tilfælde foreningerne og forbundene, eller er den en »gave« fra EU til industrien og de nye teknologier?
Does it contain safety valves for the leading stakeholders, in this case the associations and federations, or is it a ‘gift’ from the EU to the new technologies industry?
Rådet er klar over, at det af det ærede medlem nævnte spørgsmål har været relevant i forbindelse med udarbejdelsen af forslaget om revision af direktivet om fjernsyn uden grænser.
The Council is aware that the issue referred to by the Honourable Member has been of relevance in the context of the preparation of the proposal concerning the revision of the Television without Frontiers Directive.
Da dette forslag endnu ikke er blevet tilsendt Rådet, kan det ikke tage stilling til spørgsmålet.
Since this proposal has not yet been forwarded to the Council, it is not in position to take a view on the matter.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3313/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3313/05
Om: Langvarig arbejdsløshed og psykisk sundhed
Subject: Long-term unemployment and mental health
Råder Kommissionen over oplysninger om virkningerne af langtidsledighed for de arbejdsløses psykiske sundhed i medlemslandene (stress, depression osv.)?
Does the Commission have data available showing the effects of long-term unemployment on the mental health of the unemployed in the Member States (stress, depression, etc.)?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3314/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3314/05
Om: Den græske regerings beskyttelse af særlig følsomme gruppers arbejdsrettigheder
Subject: Protection by the Greek Government of the labour rights of vulnerable groups
Den 14. december 2004 arrangerede den græske ombudsmand et møde med repræsentanter fra Beskæftigelsesministeriet for at drøfte de problemer, som lov nr. 2643/98 skaber for de beskyttede personer (f.eks. personer med særlige behov), der søger arbejde.
On 14 December 2004, the Greek Ombudsman arranged a meeting with representatives of the Ministry of Employment to discuss the problems created by Law No 2643/98 for protected persons (e.g. those with special needs etc.) seeking work.
På dette møde erklærede ministeriets generalsekretær, Kontos, at han havde til hensigt at ændre loven i lyset af den forventede bekendtgørelse af ledige stillinger i det offentlige i forbindelse med anvendelsen af lov nr. 2643/98, idet han vedgik »sin særlig smertelige erfaring med denne procedure, der ofte er endt i uretfærdige afgørelser for de beskyttede personer«, fordi der skabes bureaukratiske hindringer, der ikke altid giver noget retfærdigt resultat.
At that meeting, the Secretary-General of the Ministry, Mr Kontos, stated his intention to amend the law with a view to the expected announcement of jobs by the public authorities in the context of implementing Law No 2643/98, recognising ‘his particularly bitter experience of this procedure which frequently resulted in unjust decisions for protected persons’ owing to the imposition of ‘bureaucratic obstacles, without always producing a fair result’.
Han forpligtede sig desuden til at udarbejde en lovgivningsramme, der var »mere retfærdig for alle«, samtidig med, at der den 7. december 2004 blev udstedt en ministeriel afgørelse, der ikke ændrede noget på den uacceptable situation med, at beskyttede personer (herunder svært handicappede og bevægelseshæmmede) selv skulle fremskaffe alle mulige former for dokumentation fra en lang række offentlige myndigheder.
He also undertook to draft a legal framework which would be ‘fairer for all’, at the same time as a ministerial decision was issued (7 December 2004) continuing the unacceptable situation that existed previously requiring protected persons themselves (including the severely disabled, people with mobility problems, etc.) to collect a pile of random supporting documents from a huge number of public authorities.
Den dokumentation, som de beskyttede personer skal fremskaffe, omfatter bl.a. certifikater fra OAED (den græske organisation for beskæftigelse af arbejdsstyrken), som de igen skal forelægge OAED (der er den ansvarlige myndighed for afholdelse af udvælgelsesprøver), selvom denne organisation selv har udstedt dem!
Among these documents, protected persons are also required to collect certificates from the Greek Manpower Employment Organisation (OAED), which they resubmit to the OAED (as the authority responsible for organising the competition), the organisation which actually issued them in the first place!
Denne sadistiske behandling af personer med særlige behov giver anledning til at tvivle på såvel den nuværende regerings politiske logik (idet denne regering fortsætter i samme skure som den tidligere regering med at gøre livet besværligt for de beskyttede personer) som ombudsmandens reaktioner, idet denne tilsyneladende begrænser sig til at afholde symposier, der ikke givet væsentlige resultater.
This sadistic treatment of people with special needs raises questions, both regarding the political reasoning of the present government (which continues to harass protected persons in the same way as the previous government did) and the reactions of the Ombudsman who apparently confines himself to arranging conferences with no effective outcome.
Har Kommissionen taget skridt til at undersøge forløbet (før og efter bekendtgørelsen af denne udvælgelsesprøve) og den græske regerings uretfærdige fremgangsmåde (jvf. den af regeringen selv godkendte ministerielle afgørelse)?
Has the Commission taken steps to investigate the scheming (before and during the announcement of this competition) and unjust practices (see ministerial decision) pursued by the Greek Government, which the government itself acknowledges?
Har den græske regering endnu aldrig hørt om begrebet "et-steds offentlige tjenester"?
Is the Greek Government not familiar with the notion of ‘one-stop public services’?
Hvorledes er det muligt at kræve, at de beskyttede personer forelægger dokumentation for OAED, når OAED selv råder over det relevante arkiv?
How is it possible to require protected persons to submit supporting documents to the OAED when the OAED itself is in possession of the relevant records?
Hvilke direkte foranstaltninger vil der blive truffet for at finde en løsning på denne uacceptable situation, hvad angår den igangværende udvælgelsesprocedure, der berører ti tusinder af deltagere og mennesker, der er afhængige af dem?
What immediate measures will be taken to remedy this unacceptable situation in respect of the current competition which affects tens of thousands of participants and their dependants?
Hvad angår ombudsmanden og den særlige rapport, som han afgav om emnet i juni; hvorfor fandt han det overhovedet ikke nødvendigt (i en 62 sider lang tekst) at henvise til OAED's chikane mod personer med særlige behov?
As regards the Ombudsman and the special report which he published on this subject last June, why did he not deem it necessary to make the slightest reference (in a 62-page text) to this harassment by the OAED of people with special needs?
Er dette ikke en krænkelse imod deres rettigheder, som er beskyttet i EU-retten?
Is this not a violation of their rights as protected by European law?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3315/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3315/05
Om: Overvågning af det græske statsbudget og de finansielle tals pålidelighed
Subject: Monitoring of the Greek national budget and the reliability of financial amounts
I et interview den 30. august 2005 udtalte generalsekretæren for det græske statistiske kontor, Kontopirakis, til »Wall Street Journal«, at der var problemer med pålideligheden af opstillingen og revisionen af budgetterne for de offentlige institutioner og organer, der sorterer under den græske stat, og det græske Økonomiministerium erklærer derfor, at det fra nu af vil følge Eurostats retningslinjer, hvad angår registreringen af de offentlige udgifter i begge dele af budgettet (det almindelige budget og programmet for offentlige investeringer) for alle organer.
In an interview with the Wall Street Journal on 30 August 2005, the Secretary-General of the Greek Statistical Service, Mr Kontopyrakis, said that there were problems with the reliability of the records and auditing of the budgets of public organisations and bodies supervised by the Greek State and, therefore, the Greek Ministry of Finance would henceforth follow Eurostat guidelines for recording public expenditure for both branches of the budget (the normal budget and the Public Investment Programme — PIP) for all bodies.
Samtidig med, at der blev givet udtryk for disse ædle hensigter, og man påpegede, at der var problemer med vurdering og registrering af udgifter på adskillige offentlige organers budgetter, udtalte en repræsentant for Økonomiministeriet den 20. august 2005 til avisen »Eleftherotipia«, at generalsekretariatet for investeringer for første gang havde besluttet at afskaffe kravet om opførsel af projekter i programmet for offentlige investeringer for at liberalisere udbudsproceduren.
At the same time as these admirable intentions are being voiced and problems associated with estimating and recording expenditure are being identified in many public bodies' budgets by the Ministry of Finance, a spokesman for the same Ministry stated on 20 August 2005 to the newspaper Eleftherotypia that the General Secretariat for Investment had decided, for the first time, to abolish the requirement to record projects in the PIP, in order to liberalise the procedure of calling for tenders.
Hvordan sikrer Kommissionen, at de græske myndigheder overholder regnskabsretningslinjerne, hvad angår de organer, der sorterer under staten?
How does the Commission certify compliance with its accounting guidelines by the Greek authorities in respect of bodies supervised by the State?
Er der i Økonomiministeriet blevet talt om tilfælde med »dårlige elever«, som talsmanden for dette ministeriums generalsekretær kalder de organer, der ikke overholder regnskabsstandarderne?
Have instances of ‘poor pupils’ been cited by the Greek Ministry of Finance, as the spokesman for the General Secretariat of that Ministry describes those bodies which do not comply with basic accounting standards?
Har Kommissionen i årene 2004 og 2005 undersøgt nogen græsk offentlig institution eller myndighed under staten for at fastslå ovennævnte?
Has the Commission investigated during the years 2004-2005 any Greek public organisation or supervised body to ascertain the above?
Hvis ja, hvad var det for organisationer, og hvad var resultaterne af disse undersøgelser?
If so, which bodies were they and what were the results of the investigations?
Hvad angår Økonomiministeriet: Har Kommissionen kendskab til eksistensen af denne »originale« regnskabsform i forbindelse med programmet for offentlige investeringer?
As regards the Ministry of Finance itself, is the Commission aware of the existence of this ‘original’ method of accounting under the PIP?
Er denne metode i overensstemmelse med nogen rimelig form for udgiftskontrol, især i forbindelse med offentlige projekter, der almindeligvis er forbundet med store budgetter?
Is this method consistent with any rational monitoring of expenditure, particularly in the case of public projects which usually have large budgets?
Fra hvornår begyndte den græske regering at udskrive projekter uden at opføre dem under programmet for offentlige investeringer?
Since when exactly did the Greek Government begin to call for tenders for projects without recording them in the PIP?
Har Kommissionen undersøgt disse forhold, og hvis ja, kan den vurdere størrelsen af dette »sorte hul«, som disse eksploderende udgifter skaber i statsbudgettet?
Has the Commission examined this state of affairs and, if so, can it estimate the size of the ‘black hole’ which this ‘airlifted’ expenditure creates in the national budget?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3316/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3316/05
Om: EU's finansiering af ikke-statslige organisationer
Subject: EU funding of non-governmental organisations
Ifølge artikler i den græske presse er 38 græske ikke-statslige organisationer (ngo'er) blevet tildelt 18459151,88 euro af Kommissionen i perioden 2000-2004.
According to reports in the Greek press, 38 Greek non-governmental organisations (NGOs) received EUR 18459151 .88 in subsidies from the Commission during the period 2000‑2004.
Den græske presse nævner, at Kommissionen var utilbøjelig til at fremkomme med disse oplysninger for de græske ngo'er (artikel i avisen »To Paron«, 4. september 2005).
Indeed, the Greek press reports that the Commission appeared ‘reluctant’ to make this information about Greek NGOs public (article in the newspaper To Paron of 4 September 2005).
Hvad indeholder det EU-finansierede program »Idrima Egnatia Ipirou« helt nøjagtigt?
What exactly does the EU-funded programme of the Idryma Egnatia Ipirou contain?
Hvilke år præcist har denne ngo fået støtte, og hvor høje beløb?
In which years precisely did this particular NGO receive funding and to what amount?
Ligger Kommissionen inde med oplysninger om, hvor meget økonomisk gavn Grækenland og de andre EU-lande har haft af gennemførelsen af dette initiativ?
Does the Commission have any data concerning the precise economic benefit that Greece and the other Member States of the EU have derived from the implementation of this particular initiative?
Er der f.eks. blevet skabt arbejdspladser i Grækenland og andre EU-lande som følge af understøttelsen af denne og andre græske ngo'er?
Were, for example, jobs created in Greece and other Member States through the subsidisation of this NGO and the other Greek NGOs?
Hvilke beløb har de øvrige græske ngo'er fået tildelt siden 1990 og frem til i dag?
What appropriations exactly have the other Greek NGOs received since 1990 to the present time?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3317/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3317/05
Om: Uberettiget afskedigelse af en mor
Subject: Unfair dismissal of a mother
Hariklia Tritha, mor til 7 børn, har i en række år arbejdet i OTE (det græske offentlige telefonselskab) i Patras.
Mrs Hariklia Tritha, a mother of seven children, worked for a number of years for OTE (the Greek Telecommunications Organisation) in Patras.
OTE besluttede imidlertid på uretfærdig vis ikke at forny hendes kontrakt, og denne børnerige mor er derfor nu arbejdsløs.
However, OTE decided — unjustifiably — not to renew her contract and, therefore, this mother of a large family is unemployed.
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om der findes nogen fællesskabslovgivning, der beskytter de børnerige mødres arbejdstagerrettigheder?
Can the Commission say whether there is any Community legislation which protects the labour rights of mothers of large families?
Er der i dette tilfælde tale om krænkelse af disse rettigheder fra OTE's side?
In this specific case, has OTE contravened those rights?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3318/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3318/05
af Graham Watson (ALDE) , Michael Cashman (PSE) og Jean Lambert (Verts/ALE)
by Graham Watson (ALDE) , Michael Cashman (PSE) and Jean Lambert (Verts/ALE)
Om: Gibraltars lovgivning om den seksuelle lavalder
Subject: Gibraltar age of consent legislation
Hvad er Rådets holdning til den omstændighed, at Gibraltar i mere end to et halvt år har undladt at opfylde kravet i Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstols afgørelse i dommen L og V mod Østrig om at fjerne forskellene mellem den seksuelle lavalder for homoseksuelle og heteroseksuelle?
What is the Council’s view of the failure of Gibraltar over two and a half years to comply with the law by harmonising the age of sexual consent for heterosexuals and homosexuals, as laid down by the ECJ in its judgment L & V v Austria?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Rådet træffe?
What action will the Council take?
Rådet har aldrig drøftet dette spørgsmål, eftersom det ikke henhører under dets kompetence.
The Council has never debated this question, as it is not within the sphere of its competence.
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3319/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3319/05
Hvad er Kommissionens holdning til den omstændighed, at Gibraltar i mere end to et halvt år har undladt at opfylde kravet i Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstols afgørelse i dommen L & V mod Østrig om at fjerne forskellene mellem den seksuelle lavalder for homoseksuelle og heteroseksuelle?
What is the Commission’s view of the failure of Gibraltar over two and a half years to comply with the law by harmonising the age of sexual consent for heterosexuals and homosexuals, as laid down by the ECJ in its judgment L & V v Austria?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe?
What action will the Commission take?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3320/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3320/05
Om: Rammeprogram for konkurrenceevne og innovation (2007-2013)
Subject: Competitiveness and innovation programme (2007-2013)
Hvilke drøftelser har Europa-Kommissionen haft med den skotske regering om forslaget til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets afgørelse om et rammeprogram for konkurrenceevne og innovation (2007-2013)(CIP), og på hvilket niveau fandt disse drøftelser sted?
What discussions has the European Commission had with the Scottish Executive on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Competitiveness and innovation framework programme (CIP) (2007-2013), and at what level have these discussions taken place?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om den har modtaget skriftlige bidrag fra den skotske regering ud over bidrag fra Det Forenede Kongeriges regering til dens indledende høring om CIP-programmet?
Can the Commission also state whether it received any written contribution from the Scottish Executive separate from the United Kingdom Government to its initial consultation on the CIP?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3321/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3321/05
Om: Syvende rammeprogram for forskning og teknologisk udvikling (2007-2013)
Subject: Seventh framework programme for research and development (2007-2013)
Hvilke drøftelser har Europa-Kommissionen haft med den skotske regering om forslaget til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets afgørelse om det syvende rammeprogram for forskning og teknologisk udvikling (2007-2013), og på hvilket niveau fandt disse drøftelser sted?
What discussions has the European Commission had with the Scottish Executive on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the seventh framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007‑2013), and at what level have these discussions taken place?
Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om den har modtaget skriftlige bidrag fra den skotske regering ud over bidrag fra Det Forenede Kongeriges regering til dens indledende høring om det syvende rammeprogram?
Can the Commission also state whether it received any written contribution from the Scottish Executive separate from the United Kingdom Government to its initial consultation on the seventh framework programme?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3322/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3322/05
Om: Programmet Kultur 2007
Subject: Culture 2007 programme (2007-2013)
Hvilke drøftelser har Europa-Kommissionen haft med den skotske regering om forslaget til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets afgørelse om oprettelse af programmet Kultur 2007, og på hvilket niveau fandt disse drøftelser sted?
What discussions has the European Commission had with the Scottish Executive on the proposal for a decision of the Council and European Parliament establishing the Culture 2007 programme, and at what level have these discussions taken place?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3323/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3323/05
Om: Media 2007-programmet (2007-2013)
Subject: Media 2007 programme (2007-2013)
Hvilke drøftelser har Kommissionen ført med den skotske regering om forslaget til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets afgørelse om gennemførelse af et støtteprogram for den europæiske audiovisuelle sektor (Media 2007), og på hvilket plan har disse drøftelser fundet sted?
What discussions has the European Commission had with the Scottish Executive on the proposal for a decision of the Council and European Parliament concerning the implementation of a programme of support for the European audiovisual sector (Media 2007), and at what level have these discussions taken place?
SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3324/05
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3324/05
Om: Foranstaltninger til fremme af det fælles alarmnummer 112
Subject: Action to promote 112 as a single emergency number
Ministerrådet besluttede den 29. juli 1991 at oprette et fælleseuropæisk alarmnummer, 112, som medlemsstaterne skulle indføre senest den 31. december 1992.
The Council of Ministers decided on 29 July 1991 to make 112 the single emergency number for the whole of Europe, and the Member States were supposed to have introduced that number by 31 December 1992.
Det blev imidlertid først tilgængeligt for borgerne i alle femten medlemsstater i 1999, og i dag er 112 stadig ikke gennemført på den måde, direktivet fastlagde.
However, the number 112 only became accessible to people in EU‑15 in 1999 and, to date, it is still not being applied in the way stipulated in the directive.