natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Det skal også igen understreges, at forarbejdede animalske proteiner, som stammer fra dele af dyr egnet til konsum, skal gennemgå yderligere steriliseringsprocedurer (gennem den såkaldte tryk-varmemetode) - en procedure, som de ikke behøver at gennemgå, hvis de er beregnet til produktion af fødevarer.
It should also again be underlined that processed animal proteins derived only from animal parts fit for human consumption have to undergo additional sterilization methods (through the so-called pressure heat method) - a procedure which they do not have to undergo if designated for the production of food.
I betragtning af denne yderligere foranstaltning forud for produktionen er infektionsrisikoen ved forarbejdede animalske proteiner for dyrs og menneskers sundhed ikke-eksisterende;
Taking into consideration this additional measure prior to the production of processed animal proteins, infection risks to animal and human health are non-existent;
Eventuelle ændringer af SRM-listen må derfor overvejes nøje.
Any changes to the SRM list must thus be considered carefully.
EU's SRM-liste er langt mere restriktiv end listen fra OIE (Verdensorganisationen for Dyresundhed), og ordføreren opfordrer Kommissionen til fortsat at basere enhver ændring på solid videnskabelig rådgivning, selv om dette vil resultere i en liste, som er mere restriktiv end de internationale standarder;
The EU SRM list is much stricter than the list of the OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health) and your Rapporteur encourages the Commission to continue to base any modification on solid scientific advice even if this will result in a list which is stricter than the international standard;
I betænkningen afvises enhver ændring i de nuværende kohjortenedslagningsbestemmelser.
The report rejects any changes to the current cohort culling provisions.
Da antallet af BSE-tilfælde er faldet dramatisk i de senere år, vil aflivning af dyr, der tilhører kohorten, ikke være nødvendig ret ofte.
As the number of BSE cases has dramatically fallen in recent years, the killing of the animals belonging to the cohort will not have to be pursued very often.
I tilfælde af en fornyet opblussen af BSE vil bestemmelserne stadig være gældende, og der vil ikke skulle foretages nogen lovgivningsmæssige ændringer.
In case of a re-emergence of BSE, the provisions would still be in place and no legislative changes would have to be made.
Det må også understreges, at det allerede i dag er muligt at give en medlemsstat tilladelse til at udskyde nedslagningen og den fuldstændige destruktion af kohortedyr indtil slutningen af deres produktive liv;
It also has to be emphasised that even today it is possible to allow a Member State to defer the killing and complete destruction of cohort animals until the end of their productive lives;
I betænkningen hedder det, at Kommissionens rapport om den overordnede funktion af den offentlige kontrol i medlemsstaterne vedrørende fødevaresikkerhed, dyresundhed, dyrevelfærd og plantesundhed afslører visse kvalitetsmangler i medlemsstaternes rapportering.
The report states that the Commission's report on the overall operation of official controls in the Member States on food safety, animal health and animal welfare, and plant health reveals certain quality deficiencies in the reporting of Member States.
Medlemsstaterne opfordres til at forbedre kvaliteten af ​​rapporteringen.
The Member States are asked to improve the quality of reporting.
Overvågningsmekanismen er som allerede nævnt et vigtigt instrument, der bidrager til udryddelsen af TSE i EU.
As already mentioned above, the surveillance mechanism is an important instrument contributing to the eradication of TSEs in the EU.
Rapporter skal derfor forelægges på en måde, hvorpå Kommissionen kan drage konklusioner om den samlede foder- og fødevarekontrol i EU.
Reports thus have to be submitted in a way in which the Commission can draw conclusions on the overall feed and food controls in the EU.
Desuden opfordres Kommissionen til at revidere den nuværende grænse for dioxinindhold i fiskemel, da den nuværende grænse frembyder risici for menneskers og dyrs sundhed;
Additionally, the Commission is asked to review the current threshold levels for dioxin in fish-meal as the current limit poses risks to human and animal health;
Ordføreren er bekymret over metoderne til fremstilling af maskinsepareret kød.
Your Rapporteur is concerned about the production methods of mechanically separated meat.
Det er vigtigt, at Kommissionen overvåger den aktuelle situation og vurderer problemerne med hensyn til definition af ​​maskinsepareret kød og ubetinget anvendelse af reglerne om produktion og mærkning af maskinsepareret kød.
It is important that the Commission monitors the current situation and assesses the problems with regard to the definition of mechanically separated meat and the stringent application of the rules concerning the production and labelling of mechanically separated meat.
Kommissionens meddelelse om det fremtidige behov for og den fremtidige anvendelse af ​​maskinsepareret kød i Den Europæiske Union, herunder forbrugerinformation, afslører, at fortolkningen af definitionen af, hvad der skal betragtes som maskinsepareret kød, varierer medlemsstaterne imellem.
The Commission Communication on the future necessity and use of mechanically separated meat in the European Union, including consumer information reveals that the interpretation of the definition of what is to be considered mechanically separated meat varies across Member States.
Forskelle i definitionen kan – som Kommissionen anfører i sin rapport – føre til illoyal konkurrence.
As the Commission states in its report, the differences in definition may lead to unfair competition.
Desuden er ordføreren af ​​den opfattelse, at forskelle i definitionen vildleder forbrugerne.
Additionally, your Rapporteur is of the opinion that the differences in definition mislead consumers.
I betænkningen understreges også behovet for at fremme forskning på de områder, hvor vores viden stadig er ufuldstændig.
The report also stresses the need to foster research in those areas where knowledge remains incomplete.
Kun på denne måde kan fremtidige politiske beslutninger træffes og begrundes
Only in this way can future policy decisions be made and justified.
Inés Ayala Sender, Matthias Groote, Riikka Manner, Marisa Matias, Judith A. Merkies, James Nicholson, Marit Paulsen, Michail Tremopoulos, Anna Záborská
Inés Ayala Sender, Matthias Groote, Riikka Manner, Marisa Matias, Judith A. Merkies, James Nicholson, Marit Paulsen, Michail Tremopoulos, Anna Záborská
om anmodning om ophævelse af Ágnes Hankiss’ immunitet
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Ágnes Hankiss
– der henviser til anmodning af 6. juli 2010 fra den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda om ophævelse af Ágnes Hankiss’ immunitet, hvorom der blev givet meddelelse på plenarmødet den 6. september 2010,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Ágnes Hankiss, forwarded by the Central District Court of Buda on 6 July 2010 and announced in plenary sitting on 6 September 2010,
– der har hørt Ágnes Hankiss den 11. april 2011, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 7, stk. 3,
– having heard Ágnes Hankiss on 11 April 2011 in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– der henviser til artikel 9 i protokollen af 8. april 1965 vedrørende Den Europæiske Unions privilegier og immuniteter samt artikel 6, stk. 2, i akten af 20. september 1976 om almindelige direkte valg af medlemmerne af Europa-Parlamentet,
– having regard to Article 9 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– der henviser til betænkning fra Retsudvalget ( A7-0196/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0196/2011 ),
A. der henviser til, at den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda, Budapest, har anmodet om ophævelse af medlem af Europa-Parlamentet Ágnes Hankiss’ immunitet med henblik på fornyet behandling af en straffesag mod Ágnes Hankiss i overensstemmelse med en afgørelse fra republikken Ungarns højesteret,
A. whereas the Central District Court of Buda, Budapest, has requested the waiver of immunity of Ágnes Hankiss, a Member of the Parliament, in order to conduct renewed criminal proceedings against Ágnes Hankiss as ordered by the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Hungary,
B. der henviser til, at ophævelsen af Ágnes Hankiss’ immunitet vedrører en påstået overtrædelse af artikel 181 i den ungarske straffelov om ærekrænkelse som følge af en udtalelse under programmet “ Péntek 8 mondatvadász ” den 23. januar 2004,
B. whereas the waiver of the immunity of Ágnes Hankiss relates to an alleged offence of defamation under Section 181 of the Hungarian Criminal Code as a result of a statement made during the programme ‘ Péntek 8 mondatvadász ’ on 23 January 2004,
C. der henviser til, at der er rejst privat tiltale mod Ágnes Hankiss ved stævning af 18. februar 2004 indgivet til den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda den 23. februar 2004; den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda afsagde dom den 28. juni 2005, som blev appelleret til retten i Budapest, som ophævede dommen den 3. februar 2006,
C. whereas Ágnes Hankiss was accused by a private plaintiff in an accusation dated 18 February 2004 and submitted to the Central District Court of Buda on 23 February 2004; whereas the Central District Court of Buda gave its judgment on 28 June 2005, which was then appealed against in the Budapest Municipal Court and annulled by that Court on 3 February 2006,
D. der henviser til, at sagen derfor blev hjemvist til den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda, som frifandt Ágnes Hankiss den 6. februar 2009; sagsøgeren appellerede denne afgørelse til retten i Budapest, som den 25. marts 2009 besluttede at stadfæste distriktsdomstolens dom på alle punkter,
D. whereas as a result the case was referred back to the Central District Court of Buda, which acquitted Ágnes Hankiss of the charges on 6 February 2009; whereas an appeal was brought by the plaintiff against this judgment in the Budapest Municipal Court, which on 25 March 2009 decided to uphold the judgment of the District Court on all its grounds,
E. der henviser til, at Republikken Ungarns højesteret den 12. november 2009 ophævede begge domme med den begrundelse, at der var sket en tilsidesættelse af materiel ret, og hjemviste sagen til fornyet behandling ved den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda,
E. whereas on 12 November 2009 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Hungary annulled both judgments on the grounds of breach of substantive law and instructed the Central District Court of Buda to conduct new proceedings,
F. der henviser til, at Ágnes Hankiss har været medlem af Parlamentet siden 15. juli 2009,
F. whereas Ágnes Hankiss has been a Member of the Parliament since 15 July 2009,
G. der henviser til, at Europa-Parlamentets medlemmer under Parlamentets sessioner i henhold til artikel 9 i protokollen af 8. april 1965 vedrørende Den Europæiske Unions privilegier og immuniteter på deres eget lands område nyder de immuniteter, der tilstås medlemmerne af deres lands lovgivende forsamling; dette hindrer ikke Parlamentets ret til at ophæve et af dets medlemmers immunitet,
G. whereas, according to Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, during the sessions of the Parliament its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of its parliament; and whereas this does not prevent the Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members,
H. der henviser til, at artikel 552, stk. 1, i den ungarske strafferetsplejelov kræver, at en straffesag mod en person, der nyder immunitet, udsættes, og at der anmodes om ophævelse af immuniteten, og at det fremgår af artikel 551, stk. 1, i samme lov, at der kun kan indledes straffesag mod bl.a. et medlem af Europa-Parlamentet, efter at immuniteten er ophævet,
H. whereas Section 552(1) of the Hungarian Act on Criminal Proceedings requires that criminal proceedings against a person enjoying immunity be suspended and a waiver of such immunity requested, and whereas Section 551(1) of that Act provides that criminal proceedings may only be initiated against, inter alia, a Member of the European Parliament after the suspension of immunity,
I. der henviser til, at det fremgår af artikel 12, stk. 1, i lov nr. LVII, at retten skal anmode Parlamentets formand om ophævelse af immuniteten i sager, der er undergivet privat påtale,
I. whereas Section 12(1) of Act LVII provides that the request for waiver of immunity in cases subject to private action are to be made by the court to the President of the Parliament,
J. der henviser til, at Ágnes Hankiss under den genoptagede sag efter ophævelsen anførte, at hun er medlem af Parlamentet, og at den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda derfor i medfør af artikel 552, stk. 1, i den ungarske strafferetsplejelov og artikel 12 i lov nr. LVII besluttede at udsætte sagen og anmode om ophævelse af immuniteten,
J. whereas in the new proceedings following the annulment Ágnes Hankiss stated that she is a Member of the Parliament and in consequence the Central District Court of Buda, acting on the basis of Section 552(1) of the Hungarian Act on Criminal Proceedings and Section 12 of the Act LVII, decided to suspend the proceedings and ask for the waiver of immunity,
K. der henviser til, at det derfor bør anbefales, at den parlamentariske immunitet ophæves i denne sag,
K. whereas it is therefore appropriate to recommend that parliamentary immunity be waived in this instance,
På mødet den 6. september 2010 meddelte formanden i henhold til forretningsordenens artikel 6, stk. 2, at han havde modtaget en skrivelse fra den centrale distriktsdomstol i Budapest den 6. juli 2010 om ophævelse af Ágnes Hankiss’ parlamentariske immunitet.
At the sitting of 6 September 2010 the President announced, under Rule 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, that he had received a letter sent by the Central District Court of Budapest on 6 July 2010 requesting the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Ágnes Hankiss.
Den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda, Budapest, anmoder Europa-Parlamentet om at ophæve medlemmet Ágnes Hankiss’ immunitet i forbindelse med en fornyet behandling af en straffesag, som skal foretages i henhold til en dom af 12. november 2009 fra Republikken Ungarns højesteret.
The Central District Court of Buda, Budapest, is asking the European Parliament to waive the immunity of its Member, Ágnes Hankiss, in connection with renewed criminal proceedings ordered by the judgement of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Hungary given on 12 November 2009.
Ágnes Hankiss er i en privat straffesag tiltalt for ærekrænkelse (artikel 179 i den ungarske straffelov) og navnlig ærekrænkelse i forhold til en afdød person, nemlig sagsøgerens far, i henhold til artikel 181 i den ungarske straffelov, som følge af en udtalelse fremsat under programmet “ Péntek 8 mondatvadász ” den 23. januar 2004.
Ágnes Hankiss is accused by a private plaintiff of an alleged offence of defamation of honour committed in public (Section 179 of the Hungarian Criminal Code) and, in particular the defamation of the memory of a dead person, the plaintiff’s father, under Section 181 of the Hungarian Criminal Code, as a result of a statement made during the programme ‘ Péntek 8 mondatvadász ’ on 23 January 2004.
Anklageskriftet, dateret den 18. februar 2004, blev indgivet til den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda den 23. februar 2004.
The accusation, dated 18 February 2004, was submitted to the Central District Court of Buda on 23 February 2004.
Den 28. juni 2005 blev der afsagt dom, som blev appelleret til retten i Budapest og ophævet af denne ret den 3. februar 2006.
On 28 June 2005 the Court gave its judgment, which was then appealed to the Budapest Municipal Court and annulled by that Court on 3 February 2006.
Sagen gik derfor tilbage til den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda, som frifandt Ágnes Hankiss den 6. februar 2009.
As a result the case went back to the Central District Court of Buda, which acquitted Ágnes Hankiss of the charges on 6 February 2009.
Sagsøgeren appellerede dommen til retten i Budapest, som den 25. marts 2009 stadfæstede distriktsdomstolens dom på alle punkter.
This judgement was appealed by the plaintiff to the Budapest Municipal Court, which on 25 March 2009 decided to uphold the judgment of the District Court on all its grounds.
Sagsøgeren appellerede derefter sagen til Ungarns højesteret under påberåbelse af, at frifindelsen var baseret på en tilsidesættelse af materielle strafferetlige bestemmelser.
Subsequently the plaintiff filed with the Hungarian Supreme Court an application for review of the appeal court’s judgement considering that the acquittal resulted from a violation of the substantive provisions of criminal law.
Den 12. november 2009 fastslog højesteret, at der var sket en tilsidesættelse af materielle strafferetlige bestemmelser, og hjemviste sagen til fornyet behandling ved den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda.
On 12 November 2009 the Supreme Court considered that there was indeed a violation of the substantive provisions of criminal law and ordered a renewed procedure to be conducted by the Central District Court of Buda.
Den fornyede behandling skal foretages under hensyntagen til præmisserne i højesterets afgørelse.
The court is to conduct this renewed procedure in the light of considerations stated in the decision of the Supreme Court.
Den centrale distriktsdomstol i Buda genoptog sagen den 31. marts 2010.
The Central District Court of Buda opened renewed proceedings on 31 March 2010.
Samme dag blev sagen udsat under henvisning til, at Ágnes Hankiss nyder parlamentariske immunitet som medlem af Parlamentet.
At the same day the proceedings were suspended on the grounds that Ágnes Hankiss enjoys parliamentary immunity as a Member of the Parliament.
Domstolen fremsatte den relevante anmodning om ophævelse af immuniteten den 6. juli 2010.
The relevant request for the waiver of that immunity was made by the Court on 6 July 2010.
“ Artikel 8:
Article 8:
Immuniteten kan ikke påberåbes af et medlem, som gribes på fersk gerning, og kan ikke hindre Europa-Parlamentets ret til at ophæve et af dets medlemmers immunitet. ”
Immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is found in the act of committing an offence and shall not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members.
Artikel 12 i lov nr. LVII af 2004 om de ungarske medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentets retlige status (“lov nr. LVII”) lyder således: "(1) Europa-Parlamentet er bemyndiget til at træffe afgørelse vedrørende en eventuel suspendering af et af dets medlemmernes parlamentariske immunitet .
Section 12 of the Act LVII of 2004 on the Legal Status of the Hungarian Members of the European Parliament (‘Act LVII’) reads as follows: "(1) The European Parliament is entitled to decide in connection with the suspension of the immunity of MEPs.
(4) Myndigheder, som fremsætt e r en anmodning om suspendering af parlamentarisk immunitet, giver Europa-parlamentet og dets udvalg, som beskæftiger sig med immunitetssager, alle oplysninger, som dette udvalg anser for nødvendige for at kunne træffe afgørelse om suspende r ing af parlamentarisk immunitet .
(4) Authorities submitting a request for suspension of immunity shall give to the European Parliament and its Committee dealing with immunity cases all information that this Committee deems necessary in order to form its opinion in connection with the suspension of immunity.
(5) Såfremt den parlamentariske immunitet s u spenderes, underretter den domstol eller myndighed , som træffer afgørelser , der følger af suspenderingen af parlamentarisk imm u nitet , Europa-Parlamentets formand om dens afgørelse vedrørende immuniteten.
(5) If the immunity is suspended, the court or the authority that passes any decision resulting from the suspension of the immunity shall inform the President of the European Parliament about its decision in connection with the immunity.
(7) Afgørelse om suspendering af parlamentarisk i mm unitet for kandidater til v alget til Europa-Parlamentet træffes af det nationale valgnævn.
(7) A decision concerning the suspension of immunity of candidates to the European Parliament shall be decided by the National Electoral Board.
Anmodninger om suspendering sendes til formanden for det nationale valgnævn. "
A request to this effect must be submitted to the Chairman of the National Electoral Board."
Artikel 10 i lov nr. LVII lyder således:
Section 10 of the Act LVII reads as follows:
„(1) Medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet nyde r de privilegier og immuniteter, som er indeholdt i protokollen vedrørende Den Europæiske Unions privilegier og immuniteter, der er vedføjet traktaten om oprettelse af en fælles Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber (8. april 1965) .
„(1) MEPs are entitled to the privileges and immunities that are enshrined in the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, which is attached to the Treaty Establishing a Single Commission of the European Communities (8 April 1965).
(2) Medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet nyder den samme parlamentariske immunitet som medlemmer af parlamentet .
(2) MEPs are entitled to the same immunity that Members of Parliament enjoy.
Artikel 552, stk. 1, i den ungarske strafferetsplejelov kræver, at en straffesag mod en person, der nyder immunitet, udsættes, og at der anmodes om ophævelse af immuniteten, og det fremgår af artikel 551, stk. 1, i samme lov, at der kun kan indledes straffesag mod bl.a. et medlem af Europa-Parlamentet, efter at immuniteten er ophævet.
Section 552(1) of the Hungarian Act on Criminal Proceedings requires to suspend the criminal proceedings against a person enjoying immunity and request a waiver of such immunity and Section 551(1) of that Act provides that the criminal proceedings may only be initiated against, inter alia, a Member of the Parliament after the suspension of the immunity.
” Artikel 6 - Ophævelse af immunitet:
Rule 6 - Waiver of immunity:
I forhold til protokollens artikel 9 angår retsforfølgelsen en lovovertrædelse, der skulle være begået i Ungarn, hvor Ágnes Hankiss var statsborger på gerningstidspunktet, og det er derfor kun følgende del af bestemmelsen, der kan anvendes: "Under Europa-Parlamentets sessioner nyder medlemmerne: a) på deres eget lands område de immuniteter, der tilstås medlemmerne af deres lands lovgivende forsamling" .
Under Article 9 of the Protocol, given that the proceedings concern an offence allegedly committed in Hungary, whose citizenship Ágnes Hankiss enjoyed at the material time, the only applicable part is the one pursuant to which ‘ during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members shall enjoy: a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament ’.
Den ungarske lovgivning, der finder anvendelse, er artikel 10 og 12 i lov nr. LVII.
The applicable Hungarian law is Section 10 and Section 12 of the Act LVII.
Ordføreren mener ikke, at denne sag falder inden for rammerne af Ágnes Hankiss’ politiske virksomhed som medlem af Parlamentet.
In the present case, the rapporteur finds that the case does not come within the scope of Ágnes Hankiss’s political activities as Member of the Parliament.
Den drejer sig om en udtalelse fremsat i 2004, længe før hun blev valgt til medlem af Parlamentet.
It concerns instead a statement made in 2004, long before she was elected a Member of the Parliament.
Ordføreren har heller ikke fundet noget bevis på fumus persecutionis, dvs. en tilstrækkelig alvorlig og præcis mistanke om, at sagen er blevet anlagt med den hensigt at skade medlemmets politiske virksomhed.
The rapporteur has also found no evidence of fumus persecutionis , i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the case has been brought with the intention of causing political damage to the Member.