natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Medlemsstaterne kan inddrage en status som fastboende udlænding i tilfælde af tilbagekaldelse og afslutning af eller afslag på forlængelse af international beskyttelsesstatus som angivet i artikel 14, stk. 3, og artikel 19, stk. 3, i direktiv 2004/83/EF, hvis den pågældende status som fastboende udlænding blev opnået på grundlag af international beskyttelsesstatus."
Member States may withdraw the long-term residen t status in the event of the revocation, ending or refusal to renew international protection status as prescribed by Articles 14(3) and 19(3) of Directive 2004/83/EC if the long-term resident status was obtained on the basis of international protection status.”
I artikel 11 indsættes følgende stykke ▌:
In Article 11 the following paragraph is inserted:
For så vidt angår den medlemsstat, der gav international beskyttelse, påvirker stk. 3 og 4 ikke bestemmelserne i direktiv 2004/83/EF."
As far as the Member State which granted international protection is concerned, paragraphs 3 and 4 are without prejudice to the provisions of Directive 2004/83/EC.”
Artikel 12 ændres således:
Article 12 is amended as follows:
a) Der indsættes følgende stykker :
a) The following paragraphs are inserted:
Når en medlemsstat beslutter at udvise en fastboende udlænding, hvis EU-opholdstilladelse for fastboende udlændinge indeholder den bemærkning, der er omhandlet i artikel 8, stk. 4, anmoder den den medlemsstat, der er nævnt i bemærkningen, om at oplyse, om den pågældende person stadig er under international beskyttelse i denne medlemsstat .
Where a Member State decides to expel a long-term resident whose long-term resident’s EU residence permit contains the remark referred to in Article 8(4), it shall request the Member State mentioned in the remark to confirm whether the person concerned is still a beneficiary of international protection in that Member State .
Den medlemsstat, der er nævnt i bemærkningen, svarer senest en måned efter at have modtaget anmodningen om oplysninger . "
The Member State mentioned in the remark shall reply not later than one month after receiving the request for information .
Hvis den fastboende udlænding stadig er under international beskyttelse i den konsulterede medlemsstat, udvises vedkommende til den pågældende medlemsstat, som med forbehold af den gældende EU-lovgivning eller nationale lovgivning og med forbehold af princippet om familiens enhed straks og uden formaliteter tager personen under international beskyttelse og dennes familiemedlemmer tilbage.
If the long-term resident is still a beneficiary of international protection in the consulted Member State, he/she shall be expelled to that Member State, which shall, without prejudice to applicable Union or national legislative provisions and without prejudice to the principle of family unity, immediately readmit without formalities the beneficiary of international protection and his/her family members.
Uanset stk. 3b bevarer den medlemsstat, der traf en udsendelsesafgørelse, retten til at udsende den fastboende person til et andet land end den medlemsstat, der tildelte international beskyttelse, hvis den fastboende person opfylder betingelserne i artikel 21, stk. 2, i direktiv 2004/83/EF, i overensstemmelse med dens internationale forpligtelser."
By way of derogation from paragraph 3b , the Member State which took the expulsion decision shall retain the right to remove the long-term resident to a country other than the Member State which granted international protection when the long term resident fulfils the conditions specified in Article 21(2) of Directive 2004/83/EC, in accordance with its international obligations.”
b) Der indsættes følgende som stk. 6:
b) The following paragraph 6 is added:
"Artikel 19a
“Article 19a
Når den fastboende udlændings EU-opholdstilladelse indeholder den i artikel 8, stk. 4, omhandlede bemærkning, og når den internationale beskyttelse af den fastboende udlænding i overensstemmelse med relevante internationale instrumenter eller national lovgivning er blevet overført til den anden medlemsstat inden udstedelsen af den i artikel 8, stk. 5, omhandlede tilladelse, anmoder den anden medlemsstat den medlemsstat, der har udstedt den fastboende udlændings EU-opholdstilladelse, om at ændre den i artikel 8, stk. 4, omhandlede bemærkning i overensstemmelse hermed.
Where the long-term resident's E U residen ce permit contains the remark referred to in Article 8(4), and where the international protection of the long-term resident was transferred, in accordance with the relevant international instruments or national legislation, to the second Member State before the permit referred to in Article 8(5) was issued, the second Member State shall ask the Member State which issued the long-term resident's E U residen ce permit to modify accordingly the remark referred to in Article 8(4).
Når den fastboende udlænding får international beskyttelse i den anden medlemsstat inden udstedelsen af den i artikel 8, stk. 5, omhandlede tilladelse, anmoder den anden medlemsstat den medlemsstat, der har udstedt den fastboende udlændings EU-opholdstilladelse, om at ændre den ved at indsætte den i artikel 8, stk. 4, omhandlede bemærkning.
Where the long-term resident is granted international protection in the second Member State before the permit referred to in Article 8(5) was issued, the second Member State shall ask the Member State which issued the long-term resident's E U residence permit to modify it in order to enter the remark referred to in Article 8(4).
Efter den i stk. 1-2 omhandlede anmodning udsteder den medlemsstat, der har udstedt den fastboende udlændings EU-opholdstilladelse, den ændrede tilladelse senest tre måneder efter modtagelsen af anmodningen fra den anden medlemsstat."
Following the request referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Member State which issued the long-term resident's E U residen ce permit shall issue the modified permit no later than three months after receiving the request from the second Member State .”
I artikel 22 indsættes følgende stykke ▌:
In Article 22, the following paragraph is inserted:
Medmindre den internationale beskyttelse i mellemtiden er blevet ophævet, eller personen henhører under en af de kategorier, som er angivet i artikel 21, stk. 2, i direktiv 2004/83/EF, finder stk. 3 ikke anvendelse på tredjelandsstatsborgere, hvis EU-opholdstilladelse for fastboende udlændinge, der er udstedt af den første medlemsstat, indeholder den bemærkning, der er omhandlet i artikel 8, stk. 4.
Unless in the meantime the international protection has been withdrawn or the person falls with in one of the categories specified in Article 21(2) of Directive 2004/83/EC, paragraph 3 shall not apply to third-country nationals whose long-term EU resident permit issued by the first Member State contains the remark referred to in Article 8(4).
Dette stykke anfægter ikke artikel 21, stk. 1, i direktiv 2004/83/EF".
This paragraph is without prejudice to Article 21(1) of Directive 2004/83/EC.”
Artikel 25, første afsnit, affattes således:
In Article 25, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
"Medlemsstaterne udpeger kontaktpunkter, der skal være ansvarlige for at modtage og videresende de oplysninger, som er omhandlet i artikel 8, 12, 19, 19a, 22 og 23 ."
“Member States shall appoint contact points who will be responsible for receiving and transmitting the information referred to in Articles 8, 12, 19, 19(a), 22 and 23. ”
Medlemsstaterne sætter de nødvendige love og administrative bestemmelser i kraft for at efterkomme dette direktiv senest den ...
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by ...
EUT: Dato indsættes: 24 måneder efter dette direktivs offentliggørelse i EUT. .
OJ: Please insert the date: 24 months after the publication of this Directive in the Official Journal. .
De tilsender straks Kommissionen disse bestemmelser ▌.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions▌.
Dette direktiv træder i kraft på ▌dagen efter offentliggørelsen i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende.
This Directive shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Dette direktiv er rettet til medlemsstaterne i overensstemmelse med traktaterne .
This Directive is addressed to the Member States in accordance with the Treat ies .
Udfærdiget i ▌
Done at ...,
BAGGRUNDEN FOR FORSLAGET
Historical background of the proposal
I 2001 fremsatte Kommissionen et forslag til direktiv
In 2001, the Commission presented a proposal for a Directive
KOM(2001)0127 . om tredjelandsstatsborgeres status som fastboende udlænding.
COM(2001) 127 . concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents.
I forslaget var det oprindeligt planen, at flygtninge efter fem års lovligt og uafbrudt ophold i en medlemsstat kunne få status som fastboende udlænding.
In this proposal, it was originally foreseen that refugees could qualify for long-term resident status after five years of legal and continuous residence in a Member State.
Under forhandlingerne besluttede medlemsstaterne imidlertid at udelukke flygtninge fra direktivets anvendelsesområde.
In the course of the negotiations, it was nevertheless decided by the Member States to exclude refugees from the scope of the Directive.
Efterfølgende blev der i en fælleserklæring fra Rådet og Kommissionen på Rådets møde (retlige og indre anliggender) den 8. maj 2003 opnået enighed om, at Kommissionen skulle fremlægge et forslag til direktiv om udvidelse af statussen som fastboende udlænding til også at omfatte flygtninge og personer under subsidiær beskyttelse.
Subsequently, in the Joint Statement from the Council and the Commission , made at the JHA Council of 8 May 2003, it was agreed that the Commission would table a proposal for a Directive on the extension of long-term resident status to refugees and persons under subsidiary protection.
I juni 2007 fremsatte Kommissionen dette forslag, der havde samme hjemmel som den retsakt, det skulle ændre, nemlig EF-traktatens artikel 63, stk. 3, litra a), og artikel 63, stk. 4.
This proposal was tabled by the Commission in June 2007 using the same legal base as the act it was supposed to amend, i.e. Articles 63(3)(a) and 63(4) of the EC Treaty.
Hovedformålet med forslaget var at give personer under international beskyttelse, som havde opholdt sig lovligt i en medlemsstat i fem år, retssikkerhed, for så vidt angik deres bopælsret i en medlemsstat, samt en række rettigheder, der er sammenlignelige med dem, som EU-borgere har.
The main objective of the proposal was to give beneficiaries of international protection who have been legally residing in a Member State for a period of 5 years legal certainty about their right of residence in a Member State, as well as a set of rights comparable to those of EU nationals.
Europa-Parlamentets behandling af forslaget efter høringsproceduren endte med vedtagelsen af betænkningen af Martine ROURE (PSE, FR) i april 2008.
This proposal was examined by the EP under the consultation procedure and led to the adoption of the report of Martine ROURE (PSE, FR) in April 2008.
De vigtigste ændringsforslag, som Europa-Parlamentet vedtog, var følgende:
The principle amendments adopted by the EP were:
- beregningen af de fem års ophold forud for ansøgningen om status som fastboende udlænding
- the calculation of the five years of residence preceding application for long-term residence status;
- de materielle betingelser (faste indtægter samt sygeforsikring) for at opnå status som fastboende udlænding, som Parlamentet ønskede, at personer under international beskyttelse blev fritaget for på grund af deres sårbare situation
- the material conditions (stable resources and sickness insurances) required to get the long-term residence status, from which the EP wanted beneficiaries to be exempted, due to their vulnerability;
- de nationale integrationsbetingelser, som kun burde finde anvendelse på personer under international beskyttelse, efter at der var foretaget en individuel vurdering
- the national integration conditions, which should be applied to beneficiaries of international protection only on a case by case basis;
- "non-refoulement"-princippet, som skulle styrkes gennem strengere bestemmelser.
- the principle of non-refoulement, which was to be reinforced through stricter provisions.
Forslaget blev også behandlet i Rådet, hvor debatten fokuserede på direktivets anvendelsesområde.
The proposal was also examined in the Council, where the debate focused on the scope of the Directive.
Størstedelen af delegationerne støttede, at både flygtninge og personer under subsidiær beskyttelse blev omfattet af direktivets anvendelsesområde.
A majority of delegations supported the inclusion of both refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection in the scope of the Directive.
Nogle delegationer argumenterede dog for at give direktivet et bredere sigte og medtage andre former for beskyttelse meddelt af medlemsstaterne, mens andre gik ind for at begrænse anvendelsesområdet til kun at omfatte flygtninge.
Nevertheless, some delegations argued in favour of a broader scope of the Directive, to include other forms of protection granted by Member States, while some others were in favour of limiting the scope to refugees only.
Da der krævedes enstemmighed, var det ikke muligt at opnå en aftale før Lissabontraktatens ikrafttræden.
As unanimity was required, no agreement could be reached before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty.
Derfor skal Parlamentet nu behandle forslaget på ny som led i den såkaldte omnibusmeddelelse.
For this reason the proposal is now coming back to the European Parliament as part of the so-called 'omnibus'.
I henhold til Lissabontraktatens nye bestemmelser skal det behandles efter den fælles beslutningsprocedure.
Under the new provisions of the Lisbon treaty, it will be dealt with under the co-decision procedure.
Kommissionens ændringer tager sigte på at udvide direktivets anvendelsesområde til personer under international beskyttelse, som har opholdt sig lovligt på en medlemsstats område i en periode på fem år.
The amendments put forward by the Commission aim at extending the scope of the Directive to beneficiaries of international protection who have been residing legally on the territory of a Member State for a period of 5 years.
Direktivets artikel 4 ændres for ved beregningen af denne femårsperiode at tage hensyn til hele asylprocedurens varighed.
Article 4 of the Directive is amended in order to take whole the duration of the asylum procedure into account for the calculation this 5 years period.
For at undgå risiko for "refoulement" foreslås det at ændre artikel 8 således, at medlemsstaterne forpligtes til i den opholdstilladelse for fastboende udlændinge, der meddeles til personer under international beskyttelse, at anføre en særlig bemærkning om, at personen har fået beskyttelsesstatus.
In order to avoid the risk of refoulement, an amendment is introduced to Article 8 which obliges the Member States to include in the long-term residence permit granted to beneficiaries of international protection a specific remark regarding the fact that the person has been granted protection status.
Hvis en person under international beskyttelse, der har fået status som fastboende udlænding, flytter til en anden medlemsstat og efter at have haft ophold der i fem år får status som fastboende udlænding, bør ovennævnte bemærkning anføres i den anden opholdstilladelse for fastboende udlændinge.
If the beneficiary of international protection who has been granted long term residents status moves to another Member State and after five years of residence acquires long-term resident status, then the above mentioned remark should be reproduced in the second long-term residence permit.
Spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt personer under international beskyttelse, der får status som fastboende udlændinge, bevarer deres internationale beskyttelsesstatus i medfør af direktiv 2004/83/EF, ligger uden for direktivets anvendelsesområde.
The question of whether beneficiaries of international protection who are granted long-term residence status maintain their international protection status under Directive 2004/83/EC is outside the scope of the Directive.
Hvis de bevarer deres internationale beskyttelsesstatus, har de imidlertid fortsat ret til at få de rettigheder og fordele, der er knyttet til den.
Where they maintain their international protection status, they remain nevertheless entitled to the rights and benefits attached to it.
Derfor ændres artikel 11 for at præcisere, at mulighederne for at begrænse princippet om lighed kun kan udnyttes, for så vidt som de er forenelige med bestemmelserne i direktiv 2004/83/EF.
Article 11 is therefore amended in order to clarify that the possibilities for restrictions to the principle of equality are applicable only to the extent that they are compatible with the provisions of Directive 2004/83/EC.
Ændringerne af artikel 12 og 22 tager sigte på at sikre, at "non-refoulement"-princippet, som Genève-konventionen garanterer, overholdes i alle situationer, der kan opstå under udøvelsen af rettighederne i henhold til direktiv 2003/109/EF.
The amendments to Articles 12 and 22 aim at ensuring that the principle of non-refoulement, guaranteed by the Geneva Convention, is respected in all situations which may arise in the exercise of the rights conferred by Directive 2003/109/EC.
I praksis betyder det, at medlemsstaterne, inden de udsender en person under international beskyttelse fra EU's område, først skal vurdere, om direktiv 2004/83/EF stadig finder anvendelse på denne person, og om udsendelsen vil være i overensstemmelse med "non-refoulement"-princippet.
This means concretely that before proceeding with the removal of a beneficiary of international protection from the territory of the Union, Member States will first have to assess whether Directive 2004/83/EC still applies to this person and whether the removal would be in compliance with the principle of non-refoulement.
I visse tilfælde vil det være påkrævet at konsultere den medlemsstat, der gav international beskyttelse, hvis det er en anden end den medlemsstat, der meddelte status som fastboende udlænding (artikel 12), eller den medlemsstat, hvor personen har bopæl (artikel 22).
In certain circumstances this may involve consulting the Member State which granted international protection, if different to the Member State which granted long term residence status (Article 12), or the Member State in which the person resides (Article 22).
Dette forslag vil være til direkte fordel for alle personer under international beskyttelse, som har opholdt sig lovligt på EU's område i over fem år, men som for øjeblikket ikke har ret til at få status som fastboende udlænding.
This is a proposal which would bring direct benefit to all the beneficiaries of international protection who have been residing legally on the territory of the EU for more than 5 years, but currently have no entitlement to long-term resident status.
Det vil føre til, at de ikke længere forskelsbehandles i forhold til andre tredjelandsstatsborgere, og det vil give dem større vished om deres situation i EU.
It will bring an end to their differential treatment vis-à-vis other third country nationals, and will give them greater certainty about their situation in the EU.
Det vil navnlig give personer under international beskyttelse, der bliver fastboende udlændinge, mulighed for at tage ophold i en anden medlemsstat end den, hvor deres status blev anerkendt.
Notably, it would enable beneficiaries of international protection who become long-term residents to take up residence in a Member State other than the one in which they were recognised.
Af disse årsager bør dette forslag bifaldes, og derfor går ordføreren ind for en konstruktiv tilgang, hvor størstedelen af Kommissionens ændringsforslag og mange af de tekniske ændringer, som Rådet har vedtaget under forhandlingerne om dette instrument, godkendes.
For these reasons this proposal should be welcomed, and therefore your rapporteur is in favour of a constructive approach, taking on board most of the Commission's proposed amendments, as well as many of the technical changes agreed upon by the Council during the negotiations of this instrument.
Dette udkast til betænkning er et udtryk for ønsket om at imødekomme nogle af medlemsstaternes ønsker med henblik på at opnå en aftale ved førstebehandlingen og et tilsagn om at beskytte personer under international beskyttelse, både før og efter at de har fået status som fastboende udlænding.
This draft report reflects the wish to take into account some of the concerns of Member States, with the aim of reaching a first-reading agreement, as well as a commitment to protecting the interests of beneficiaries of international protection before and after acquiring long-term residence status.
Derfor er hensigten med denne betænkning at
To this end, this report:
- støtte, at forslaget finder anvendelse på både flygtninge under Genève-konventionen og personer under subsidiær beskyttelse
- Supports the application of the proposal to both Geneva Convention refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection.
- støtte Kommissionens forslag om, at der ved beregningen af de fem års lovligt ophold tages hensyn til hele asylprocedurens varighed
- Upholds the Commission's proposal that the full duration of the procedure should be taken into account in the calculation of the 5 years period of legal residence.
- præcisere, at enhver anden periode med lovligt ophold, herunder en periode med midlertidig beskyttelse før meddelelsen af international beskyttelse, bør tages i betragtning ved beregning af femårsperioden
- Clarifies that any other period of legal residence, including a period of temporary protection before the granting of international protection, should be taken into account in the 5 years calculation.
- gøre opmærksom på, at i betragtning af at nogle medlemsstater huser et uforholdsmæssigt stort antal personer under international beskyttelse, kan sådanne personers berettigelse til at opnå status som fastboende udlænding medføre, at det pres, som disse medlemsstater er udsat for, forværres, navnlig på grund af deres geografiske placering eller demografiske forhold.
- Notes that in view of the fact that some Member States host a disproportionate number of beneficiaries of international protection, the eligibility of such beneficiaries to long-term resident status in accordance with this Directive may have the effect of exacerbating the pressure to which those Member States are subjected, due in particular to their geographical or demographic situation.
Selv om der derfor kræves andre foranstaltninger for at afbøde denne uønskede virkning, understreger ordføreren, at bestemmelserne i dette direktiv bør anvendes på en sådan måde, at det gøre lettere for personer, der er berettigede til international beskyttelse, og som har status som fastboende udlænding i en medlemsstat, der står over for et sådant uforholdsmæssigt pres, at udøve denne ret i en anden medlemsstat end den, der gav dem den internationale beskyttelse
While other measures are therefore required to address this undesired consequence, your rapporteur stresses that the provisions of this Directive should be applied in such a way as to facilitate the exercise of the right of beneficiaries of international protection who enjoy long-term resident status in a Member State facing such disproportionate pressures, to reside in a Member State other than the one which granted them international protection.
- støtte de foreslåede foranstaltninger til beskyttelse mod "refoulement" ved, at der indsættes en bemærkning i opholdstilladelsen for fastboende udlændinge, og at medlemsstaterne, hvis udvisning overvejes, forpligtes til at konsultere den medlemsstat, der gav beskyttelse
- Upholds the proposed safeguards against refoulement, by including a remark in the long-term residence permit and obliging Member States to consult the Member State that granted protection in case of possible expulsion.