natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
En dødsdisposition foretaget før datoen for denne forordnings anvendelse er antagelig og gyldig, både materielt og med hensyn til form, hvis den opfylder betingelserne i kapitel III, eller hvis den var antagelig og gyldig, både materielt og med hensyn til form, i henhold til internationalprivatretlig lov, der var gældende på det tidspunkt, hvor dispositionen blev foretaget, i den stat, hvor den afdøde havde sit sædvanlige opholdssted, eller i en hvilken som helst af de stater, hvor den pågældende var statsborger, eller i den medlemsstat, hvor den myndighed befinder sig, der behandler arvesagen.
A disposition of property upon death made prior to the date of application of this Regulation shall be admissible and valid in substantive terms and as regards form if it meets the conditions laid down in Chapter III or if it is admissible and valid in substantive terms and as regards form in application of the rules of private international law in force, at the time the disposition was made, in the State in which the deceased had his habitual residence or in any of the States whose nationality he possessed or in the Member State of the authority dealing with the succession.
Er en dødsdisposition truffet før datoen for denne forordnings anvendelse i overensstemmelse med den lov, som den afdøde kunne have valgt i henhold til denne forordning, betragtes denne lov som valgt til at være den lov, der finder anvendelse på arven .
If a disposition of property upon death was made prior to the date of application of this Regulation in accordance with the law which the deceased could have chosen in accordance with this Regulation, that law shall be deemed to have been chosen as the law applicable to the succession. ▌
Artikel 51 Ikrafttræden
Article 51 Entry into force
Den anvendes fra [...]
It shall apply from […]
EUT: 36 måneder efter datoen for forordningens ikrafttræden. bortset fra artikel 46 og 46a, der anvendes fra [...]
OJ: 36 months after the date of entry into force of the Regulation. , except for Articles 46 and 46a which shall apply from […]
EUT: 9 måneder inden datoen for forordningens anvendelse. , og artikel 47, 47a og 48, der anvendes fra [...]
OJ: 9 months before the date of application of the Regulation. and Articles 47, 47a and 48 which shall apply from […]
EUT: Dagen efter datoen for forordningens vedtagelse. .
OJ: The day following the date of adoption of the Regulation.
Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i medlemsstaterne i overensstemmelse med traktaterne .
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all the Member States in accordance with the Treaties .
Udfærdiget i ... den
Done at
Det centrale for en EU-løsning er ensartede tilknytningskriterier om retternes kompetence og den lov, der skal anvendes.
Uniform connecting factors for determining court competence and applicable law are the nub of a European solution.
Efter Kommissionens forslag er det sædvanlige opholdssted den afgørende faktor i begge tilfælde.
In the Commission proposal, habitual residence is the determining factor for both.
Dertil hører imidlertid helt afgørende testators ret til at vælge oprindelseslandets lov som den lov, der skal finde anvendelse kombineret med muligheden for i et sådant tilfælde at henvise sagen til en ret i oprindelseslandet.
One essential feature of this, however, is the right of testators to be able to choose their home country's law as the law governing their succession, in conjunction with the possibility of referral to a court in their home country.
Forslaget må evalueres i lyset af denne kombination.
The proposal has to be assessed in the light of that linkage.
Alle løsninger har stærke og svage sider.
Every solution has its strong points and weak points.
Der vil altid være forløb, der ikke giver helt tilfredsstillende resultater.
There will always be sequences of events whose outcome is not totally satisfactory.
Det ligger i sagens natur, det vanskelige emne, de mange personlige forhold og målkonflikterne mellem de forskellige vurderinger.
This is quintessentially so: it is a difficult field; personal circumstances differ; and differing judgments result in conflicting objectives.
En vurdering må foretages på grundlag af en samlet betragtning.
An assessment must take in all factors.
Derfor bør de grundlæggende elementer i Kommissionens forslag støttes.
The basic policy line in the Commission proposal should therefore be endorsed.
De er også stort set i overensstemmelse med Europa-Parlamentets udtalelse om grønbogen
Essentially, furthermore, it is in line with Parliament's opinion on the Green Paper
Forslaget skaber retssikkerhed, er forholdsvis klart og enkelt, og de vigtigste spørgsmål er også forståelige for almindelige borgere.
The proposal creates legal certainty, is comparatively clear and straightforward, and, with regard to the key issues it addresses, can also be understood by the man and woman in the street.
Opsplitning af arv undgås.
Fragmentation of successions is avoided.
På grund af princippet om det sædvanlige opholdssted kan den kompetente ret normalt anvende landets egen lovgivning, også på tredjelandsborgere.
Because habitual residence would be the connecting factor, the competent court would be able, as a rule, to apply its own law, including vis-à-vis third-country nationals.
Normalt vil testators sædvanlige opholdssted også være centrum for vedkommendes interesser.
In most cases, the place of habitual residence of a testator will also be his or her centre of interests.
Gennem et lovvalg kan der sikres parallelisme gennem henvisning til en ret i oprindelseslandet.
Where a particular country's law is chosen, parallelism can be ensured through referral to a court in the home country.
Muligheden for lovvalg styrker borgernes autonomi.
The new choice-of-law right would make citizens more autonomous.
Med begrænsningen til statsborgerskabet sikres samtidig arverettens almenpolitiske funktion og beskyttelse af familiemedlemmerne, og misbrug hindres i vid udstrækning.
At the same time, restricting it to the law governing nationality would maintain the public policy function of law on succession and safeguards for relatives and, to as great an extent as possible, prevent evasion or abuse.
Statsborgerskab er et pålideligt kriterium for tilknytning.
Nationality is a reliable connecting factor.
På dette grundlag kan der ske anerkendelse og fuldbyrdelse af afgørelser.
On this basis, provision can be made for decisions to be recognised and enforced.
Kommissionens forslag afrundes med indførelse af et europæisk arvebevis.
The Commission proposal is rounded off by the establishment of a European Certificate of Succession.
Der er her ikke tale om en afsluttende, retskraftig afgørelse om arv, men om et bevis vedrørende arven.
It would not constitute a final, unappealable ruling on a particular succession; rather, it would be a certificate relating to that succession.
Dette fungerer som dokumentation for registrering i registre og for, at arvinger er i god tro.
It would be used, on a cross-border basis, as proof of entries in registers and, as a safeguard for persons acquiring succession property, would enjoy a presumption of accuracy.
Dette forbedrer de grænseoverskridende rets- og forretningsforhold i arvesager på afgørende vis.
This would be a critical improvement in cross-border legal and commercial transactions in matters of succession.
Sammenfattende konstateres:
To sum up:
For borgere, der har deres sædvanlige opholdssted i oprindelseslandet ændres intet, hvis deres samlede aktiver kun befinder sig der.
For citizens habitually resident in their home country, if all their assets are there, nothing would change.
Har de aktiver, navnlig fast ejendom, uden for oprindelseslandet, er disse også fuldt ud og uden testamentariske dispositioner omfattet af oprindelseslandets lov.
Any assets they owned outside their home country, especially land and property, would also be subject in their entirety to the law of their home country without any particular testamentary dispositions.
Skulle borgere have eller ønske at tage sædvanligt opholdssted uden for oprindelseslandet, kan de vælge oprindelseslandets lov.
Citizens habitually resident outside their home country, or intending to be so, would be able to choose the law of their home country.
Det er en afgørende forbedring.
That is a critical improvement.
Også rådgivere i arvesager får dermed et sikkert grundlag.
Advisers on succession would also be given a secure basis on which to operate.
Retterne eller de øvrige kompetente instanser vil normalt kunne anvende deres egen ret.
As a rule, courts or other competent entities would be able to apply their own law.
Afviklingen af grænseoverskridende arvesager forenkles betragteligt.
Handling cross-border successions would be made considerably easier.
Borgere, der har deres sædvanlige opholdssted uden for oprindelseslandet og ikke har truffet et lovvalg, vil fremover være omfattet af arveretten i opholdsstaten.
Deceased persons who had been habitually resident outside their home country and who had not made a choice of law would be subject to the law on succession of the country of residence.
Dette er en nyskabelse i alle medlemsstater.
That would be new for all Member States.
For så vidt angår betænkeligheder, kan der henvises til, at der også nu er tale om denne retsstilling i mange tilfælde, uden at borgerne er klar over det.
As far as misgivings are concerned, it should be pointed out that in many instances, without the public being aware of it, this is already the position in law.
Disse betænkeligheder kan modvirkes med oplysningskampagner.
Misgivings can be dispelled through information campaigns.
Der er fordele og ulemper ved alle løsninger, der kan ikke samtidig tages hensyn til alle mål.
There are benefits and drawbacks to any approach, and not all objectives can be taken account of at the same time.
Ordføreren finder, at den nuværende retsstilling som enhver anden løsning giver væsentligt flere problemer, og foretrækker derfor den foreslåede løsning.
The rapporteur takes the view that the current legal position - and any other approach - is significantly more problematic, and therefore regards what is being proposed as preferable.
Forordningen kan ikke løse alle problemer og skal ikke regulere hver enkelt detalje, men den vil forbedre den nuværende retsstilling betragteligt.
The regulation cannot resolve all problems and should not regulate every detail, but it would considerably improve the present legal position.
Borgerne får et klart og sikkert grundlag i arvesager.
Individuals would be given a clear and secure basis for arranging their succession.
De kan bedre udøve deres rettigheder på det indre marked.
They would be able to exercise their rights on the internal market more effectively.
Retsklarhed og retssikkerhed er centrale værdier, navnlig i forbindelse med arveret.
Legal clarity and legal certainty are central qualities within law on succession in particular.
Denne forordning vil styrke disse værdier, gavne borgerne og skabe en betragtelig europæisk merværdi.
The regulation would strengthen them, benefit the public and create considerable European added value.
Der henvises dog til følgende:
To clarify matters, it should be pointed out that:
(1) Den ret, der skal anvendes, har ingen indflydelse på den arveafgiftsret, der skal anvendes.
(1) the applicable law has no influence on the applicable inheritance tax law;
(3) Det forenede Kongerige og Irland har gjort brug af deres ret til opt-out.
(3) the United Kingdom and Ireland have made use of their right to opt out.
Retsgrundlaget for forslaget til forordning er artikel 81 i TEUF.
The legal basis for this proposal for a regulation is Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Trods støtten til forslagets grundlæggende elementer, er der stadig store problemer, rettelser og ændringer tilbage.
Despite the fact that the proposal's basic policy line is endorsed, difficult problems remain and corrections and additions need to be made.
Nogle af disse vil blive behandlet her.
A number of them will be examined.
Sædvanligt opholdssted
Habitual residence
Det sædvanlige opholdssted er et nøglebegreb i forordningen.
Habitual residence is a key concept in the regulation.
Der lægges med rette særlig vægt på dette, så en så klar definition som muligt vil være hensigtsmæssig.
Special attention is rightly paid to it, and as clear a definition as possible is called for.
En definition med obligatoriske betingelser og/eller frister vil ikke være rimelig på grund af de meget forskellige livsforhold.
A definition imposing conditions and/or time limits does not do justice to the diversity of personal circumstances.
Det vil ikke give et sikrere resultat, men snarere forsinke processen.
It will not be any more reliable as a result, but the process may be more protracted.
Ved dødsfald bør den kompetente ret fastlægges hurtigst muligt.
After a death, the competent court should be determined as quickly as possible.
Denne kan og skal i de enkelte tilfælde på grundlag af generelle kriterier træffe afgørelse om sædvanligt opholdssted og om sin egen kompetence, således som beskrevet i en betragtning.
Case by case, it will then be able to determine habitual residence and whether it is competent - and indeed must do so - on the basis of general criteria, as set out in a recital.
I øvrigt henvises til, at kun de færreste nationale retsordener indeholder en lovmæssig definition af dette begreb, hvilket også gælder for EU-forordningen om underholdspligt og en hel række internationale aftaler.
It should furthermore be pointed out that very few national legal systems have a statutory definition of the concept, and no definition is provided either in the European regulation concerning law on maintenance or in a whole host of international conventions.
Muligheden for lovvalg, som er nyt for mange borgere og stater, er et centralt element i forslaget.
The right to choose the law applicable - an innovation for many individuals and states - is a key plank of the proposal.
I overensstemmelse med princippet om favor testamenti bør der foretages nogle tydeliggørelser og tilføjelser.
In the interests of 'favor testamenti', various points should be clarified and added to.
Afgrænsning til medlemsstaternes materielle og processuelle lovgivning
Distinction made with Member States' substantive and procedural law
Med forordningen reguleres kun medlemsstaternes internationalprivatretlige bestemmelser og ikke deres materielle arveret og øvrige materielle og processuelle lovgivning.
The regulation is intended to cover only the IPL rules of Member States and not their substantive law on succession or other substantive or procedural law.
Der er dog mindre berøringer og overlapninger.
However, there is encroachment and overlapping on a minor scale.
Årsagen er den forskellige udformning af arvelovene, den materielle ret og medlemsstaternes arveprocedurer.
The reason for this is that Member States' law on succession, substantive law and succession proceedings differ.
Medlemsstaternes materielle og processuelle lovgivning skal efter ordførerens forslag forblive så uberørte som muligt.
Under the rapporteur's proposal, Member States' substantive and procedural law would remain unaffected as far as possible.
Derfor stiller ordføreren et andet forslag, som efter hans mening omfatter det minimum, der bør gennemføres, for ikke at berøre de nationale materielle og processuelle lovgivninger.
To be on the safe side, accordingly, the rapporteur has made a second proposal. which, to his mind, contains the minimum which should be laid down so as not to interfere with national substantive and procedural law.
Arvepagter er et særligt problem inden for den internationale privatret, fordi de er ukendte eller endog afvises i mange stater.
In IPL, agreements as to succession are a particular problem in that, in some countries, they are unknown or even not allowed.
Det bør være klart, at arveretten og dermed f.eks. tvangsarven for hver part i en arvepagt fastlægges særskilt efter forordningen.
It should be clear that the law on succession and hence, for example, on indefeasible interests would be separately determined by the regulation, for each party to an agreement as to succession.
Ændringerne bør også gavne de medlemsstater, der ikke kender til arvepagter.
The changes ought also to be in the interests of Member States in which agreements as to succession are unknown.
Grundlæggende retsprincipper (ordre public)
Public policy
Forbeholdet for ordre public er et anerkendt princip i den internationale privatret.
The public policy caveat is a recognised legal principle in IPL.
I forholdet mellem medlemsstaterne bør det som følge af den fælles retsopfattelse og de fælles værdier ikke længere have betydning.
In relations between the Member States, given their shared legal beliefs and values, it should no longer have significance.
Betænkeligheder over, at der skulle blive åbnet muligheder for at unddrage sig reglerne om tvangsarv er ubegrundede.
Misgivings that there would be new ways and means of evading law on indefeasible interests are baseless.
Næsten alle medlemsstater har regler om tvangsarv, om end i forskellig form.
Law on indefeasible interests exists in virtually all Member States, albeit in differing forms.
Har en testator valgt sit hjemlands ret, er der ingen grund til at anstille overvejelser om omgåelse.
If a testator opts for his or her home country's law, there is no reason even to consider the possibility of evasion.
Havde lovvalget været knyttet til det sædvanlige opholdssted, kunne man have frygtet dette.
If the choice-of-law right had been linked to habitual residence, that would have been a justifiable fear.
Efter det foreliggende forslag er et ikke nok, at en borger tager sædvanligt opholdssted i en anden medlemsstat, han må også have sit sædvanlige opholdssted dér på dødstidspunktet (men ikke nødvendigvis dø der) Det virker noget søgt at antage, at et større antal mennesker vil skifte sædvanligt opholdssted med den hensigt at bevare dette til deres død.
Under this proposal, it would not be enough for individuals to take up habitual residence in another Member State; rather, they would have to have been habitually resident there at time of death (but would not have to have actually died there).
Borgere, der ønsker at omgå loven, finder også muligheder i den gældende ret.
It would appear somewhat far-fetched to assume that many people will transfer their residence on that basis with the intention of keeping it there until they die.
Anerkendelse af officielt bekræftede dokumenter
Recognition of authentic instruments
Ordføreren går ind for anerkendelse af officielt bekræftede dokumenter med henblik på fri bevægelighed og ”anerkendelse” af disses ægthed og formelle beviskraft.
The rapporteur is in favour of the recognition of authentic instruments in that they should freely circulate and there should be 'recognition' of their authenticity and formal evidentiary effect.
Begrebet ”anerkendelse” kan dog føre til misforståelser, da det ikke er entydigt i sig selv, men skal fortolkes i de respektive kontekster.
The term 'recognition' may lead to misunderstandings, however, since it is not self-evident, but, rather, would have to be interpreted on a case-by-case basis.
Det europæiske arvebevis
European Certificate of Succession
Det europæiske arvebevis bør begrænses til grænseoverskridende forhold.
The European Certificate of Succession should be restricted to cross-border matters.
Alle instanser - retter, myndigheder, notarer eller andre instanser – der beskæftiger sig med arv bør være kompetente til at udstede dette bevis.
Any entity dealing with an estate - courts, authorities, notaries, etc. - should be competent to issue it.
Disse instanser fastlægges af den medlemsstat, der er kompetent, jf. kapitel II.
Such entities should be determined by the Member State whose competence is established in accordance with Chapter II.
om rapport om Unionsborgerskab 2010 - Afskaffelse af hindringerne for unionsborgernes rettigheder
on the EU Citizenship Report 2010: Dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights
UDTALELSE fra Udvalget om Konstitutionelle Anliggender ...................31
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ................................32
RESULTAT AF DEN ENDELIGE AFSTEMNING I UDVALGET..........................................36
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................36
– der henviser til retten til at indgive andragender, der er nedfældet i artikel 227 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde (TEUF),
– having regard to the right of petition enshrined in Article 227 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
– der henviser til artikel 20 i TEUF, hvori begrebet unionsborgerskab er defineret,
– having regard to Article 20 TFEU, which defines the concept of citizenship,
– der henviser til anden del af TEUF med overskriften "Ikke-forskelsbehandling og unionsborgerskab" og til afsnit III og V i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder,
– having regard to Part Two of the TFEU, entitled Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union , and Titles III and V of the Charter of Fundamental Rights,
– der henviser til, at de europæiske arbejdstageres frie bevægelighed, der er sikret i artikel 45 i TEUF, forudsætter afskaffelse af enhver i nationalitet begrundet forskelsbehandling af medlemsstaternes arbejdstagere, for så vidt angår beskæftigelse, aflønning og øvrige arbejdsvilkår,
– having regard to Article 45 TFEU, under which guaranteed freedom of movement for EU workers entails the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality between workers of the Member States as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work and employment,
– der henviser til artikel 3, 10 og 11 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union og artikel 8 i TEUF,
– having regard to Articles 3, 10 and 11 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 8 TFEU,
– der henviser til Kommissionens meddelelse af 27. oktober 2010 med titlen "På vej mod en akt for det indre marked - For en social markedsøkonomi med høj konkurrenceevne” ( COM(2010)0608 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 27 October 2010 entitled ‘Towards a Single Market Act – for a highly competitive social market economy’ ( COM(2010)0608 ),
– der henviser til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 987/2009 af 16. september 2009 om de nærmere regler til gennemførelse af forordning (EF) nr. 883/2004 om koordinering af de sociale sikringsordninger
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems
– der henviser til sin beslutning af 2. april 2009 om unionsborgerskabets problemer og perspektiver
– having regard to its resolution of 2 April 2009 on problems and prospects concerning European Citizenship
– der henviser til Kommissionens forslag af 11. august 2011 til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets afgørelse om borgernes Europaår (2013)( COM(2011)0489 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal of 11 August 2011 for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Year of Citizens (2013) ( COM(2011)0489 ),
– der henviser til Stockholmprogrammet, som placerer borgeren i centrum for den europæiske indsats på områderne frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed og garanterer respekt for mangfoldighed og beskyttelse af de mest sårbare,
– having regard to the Stockholm Programme, which makes the citizen the focal point of European action on freedom, security and justice, guaranteeing respect for diversity and protection for the most vulnerable,