natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
R. der henviser til, at Rådet (retlige og indre anliggender) i sine ovennævnte konklusioner fra mødet den 27. november 2008 anmodede Kommissionen om at fremsætte en fortolkende erklæring med retningslinjer for direktiv 2004/38/EF's virkemåde primo 2009 og om at overveje alle andre relevante og nødvendige foranstaltninger,
R. whereas in its above-mentioned Conclusions of 27 November 2008 the Justice and Home Affairs Council requested the Commission to bring forward an interpretative statement providing guidelines on the operation of Directive 2004/38/ES in early 2009 and to consider all other appropriate and necessary measures,
S. der henviser til, at følgende hovedtemaer blev identificeret som problematiske på grundlag af de indsamlede oplysninger, primært gennem de nationale parlamenters besvarelser af Parlamentets spørgeskema, som desværre ikke er udtømmende og ikke omfatter alle medlemsstaterne, suppleret med Kommissionens rapport:
S. whereas, on the basis of the information gathered, notably through national parliaments’ answers to Parliament's questionnaire, which is unfortunately not exhaustive and does not cover all the Member States, and in addition to the Commission Report, the following main issues were identified as problematic:
– medlemsstaternes restriktive fortolkning af begrebet "familiemedlem" (artikel 2), af "ethvert andet familiemedlem" og af "partner" (artikel 3), især i forbindelse med partnere af samme køn og deres ret til fri bevægelighed i henhold til direktiv 2004/38/EF
– restrictive interpretation by Member States of the notion of "family member" (Article 2), of "any other family member" and of "partner" (Article 3), particularly in relation to same sex partners, and their right to free movement under Directive 2004/38/EC
– uberettigede administrative byrder pålægges ved familiemedlemmers indrejse og ophold, når familiemedlemmerne er tredjelandsstatsborgere
– unjustified administrative burdens are imposed in respect of the entry and residence of third-country family members
Adskillige klager og andragender, som er blevet sendt til EU-institutionerne, fremhæver, at nogle medlemsstater er utilbøjelige til fuldt at anerkende de rettigheder, som tilkommer familiemedlemmer fra tredjelande, f.eks. forhindrer lovgivningen i Det Forenede Kongerige, Litauen og Polen familiemedlemmer, som ikke er EU-borgere, i at rejse ind i det pågældende land uden visum.
Several letters of complaint and petitions addressed to EU Institutions highlight that some Member States are reluctant to fully recognise their rights to third countries family members; by way of example, UK, Lithuanian and Polish legislation preclude a non-EU family member from entering without a visa.
De juridiske og administrative hindringer for familiemedlemmer fra tredjelande er yderst problematiske; gør opmærksom på, at Det Forenede Kongeriges lovgivning i strid med direktivet udelukker et familiemedlem, som ikke er EU-borger, og som har et opholdsbevis udstedt af et andet land, fra at indrejse i landet uden et visum, og at Det Forenede Kongeriges administrative praksis er af en sådan art, at store forsinkelser og omfattende dokumentation i forbindelse med behandlingen af ansøgninger om opholdsbeviser til familiemedlemmer, der er tredjelandsstatsborgere, ligeledes udgør betydelige hindringer for udøvelsen af retten til fri bevægelighed; gør opmærksom på, at tredjelandsstatsborgere har problemer i Estland, når de prøver at komme ind i landet med et opholdsbevis udstedt af en anden medlemsstat, og at familiemedlemmer, der er tredjelandsstatsborgere, ved ansøgning om visum også er blevet bedt om at betale visumgebyr; gør opmærksom på, at tredjelandsstatsborgere, der i Italien ansøger om familiesammenføring, vil blive afkrævet dokumentation for, at deres økonomiske midler kommer fra en lovlig kilde, og at disse midler ikke må være mindre end den årlige socialydelse; ,
Legal and administrative obstacles affecting third-country family members are extremely problematic; UK legislation precludes a non-EU family member who has a residence card issued by another country from entering the country without a visa, and UK administrative practices are such that lengthy delays and extensive documentation in the processing of applications for residence cards for family members who are third-country nationals also constitute significant obstacles to the exercise of free movement rights; in Estonia, third-country nationals face problems when attempting to enter the country with a residence card issued by another Member State, and third-country family members applying for visas have been also asked to pay the visa fee; in Italy, a third-country national citizen who applies for family reunification will be required to show the lawfulness of the origin of his/her economic resources, the amount of which may not be lower than the yearly social allowance. ,
– medlemsstaternes fortolkning af "tilstrækkelige midler" i henhold til artikel 7, stk. 1, litra b), i direktiv 2004/38/EF er ofte uklar, idet de fleste medlemsstater kræver, at der gives dokumentation for tilstrækkelige midler; begrebet "urimelig byrde for værtsmedlemsstatens sociale system" og om og i hvilke tilfælde der kan træffes beslutning om at udvise en unionsborger, som er blevet en urimelig byrde (artikel 14, betragtning 10), er også usikker i mange medlemsstater
– the interpretation by Member States of "sufficient resources" under Article 7(1)(b) of Directive 2004/38/EC is often unclear, as most Member States require that evidence of sufficient resources be given; the notion of "unreasonable burden to the social assistance system of the host Member State" and if and in what cases the decision to expel a Union citizen who has become an unreasonable burden (Article 14, recital 10) is in many Member States uncertain as well
Eksempelvis skal EU-borgere i henhold til italiensk lovgivning dokumentere, at de har tilstrækkelige midler. ,
For example in relation to Italian legislation which requires EU citizens to give evidence of their sufficient resources; ,
– fortolkningen af begrebet "alvorlige/bydende nødvendige hensyn til den offentlige orden eller sikkerhed", og omstændighederne og årsagerne, som lægges til grund for en afgørelse om udvisning (artikel 27 og 28), varierer fra den ene medlemsstat til den anden, er uklare og kan føre til misbrug (rette sig mod statsborgere fra visse medlemsstater), eller også må der stilles spørgsmålstegn ved, om de er i overensstemmelse med direktiv 2004/38/EF (f.eks. automatiske udvisningsprocedurer)
– the interpretation by Member States of the expression "serious/imperative grounds of public policy and public security" and in what cases and on what grounds it can justify an expulsion order (Articles 27 and 28) vary from one Member State to the other, are unclear and could lead to abuse (targeting of citizens of a certain Member State) or are of dubious conformity with Directive 2004/38/EC (for instance, automatic expulsion mechanisms)
F.eks. er det i § 235 i den italienske straffelov fastsat, at udenlandske statsborgere, som er dømt til mindst to års fængsel, udvises. ,
For instance, Article 235 of the Italian criminal code provides for the expulsion of non nationals convicted to 2 or more years of imprisonment. ,
– det kræves ofte uberettiget, at unionsborgere indleverer supplerende dokumenter, som ikke fremgår af direktiv 2004/38/EF
– Union citizens are often required to submit to the authorities of the host Member State unjustified additional documents not provided for in Directive 2004/38/EC
– lovgivning og praksis med hensyn til misbrug af rettigheder og proformaægteskaber,
– law and practice in relation to abuse of rights and marriages of convenience,
T. der henviser til, at der i nogle medlemsstater er betydelige forskelle på identitetspapirer for statsborgere i den pågældende stat og unionsborgere fra en anden medlemsstat, som finder det vanskeligt at bevise, at de er unionsborgere, som er bosiddende i EU, hvilket i praksis er en alvorlig hindring for, at de kan udøve deres rettigheder og integreres i social- og erhvervsliv;
T. Whereas in some Member States there are significant differences in identity documents between nationals of the country and Union citizens from another Member State, who find it difficult to prove that they are resident Union citizens, which in practice seriously hinders the exercise of their rights and their integration into social and business life,
U. der henviser til, at medlemsstaternes ringe gennemførelse af direktiv 2004/38/EF til gennemførelse af EF-traktatens artikel 18 bør fordømmes, og at denne situation resulterer i, om ikke at direktivets effektivitet og nødvendighed selv undermineres, så i en frakendelse af en af de centrale rettigheder, som EU er baseret på, og som traktaterne tillægger unionsborgerne,
U. whereas the poor transposition of Directive 2004/38/EC implementing Article 18 of the EC Treaty by Member States should be condemned, and whereas such a situation results, if not in the effectiveness and necessity of the Directive itself being undermined, in the non-application of one of the key rights on which the EU is based and which are conferred on Union citizens by the Treaties,
V. der henviser til, at mobile arbejdstagere fra lande, der tilsluttede sig EU i 2004 og 2007 ifølge Kommissionens meddelelse af 18. november 2008 om konsekvenserne af arbejdskraftens frie bevægelighed som følge af udvidelsen af EU i den første fase (1. januar 2007 – 31. december 2008) af overgangsordningerne ( KOM(2008)0765 ), har haft en positiv indvirkning på medlemsstaternes økonomier,
V whereas according to the Commission Communication of 18 November 2008 on the impact of free movement of workers in the context of EU enlargement ( COM(2008)0765 ) during the first phase (1 January 2007 – 31 December 2008) of the transitional arrangements mobile workers from the countries that joined the EU in 2004 and 2007 have had a positive impact on the economies of Member States,
W. der henviser til, at fire af medlemsstaterne i EU-15 ikke har åbnet deres arbejdsmarkeder for arbejdstagere fra medlemsstaterne i EU-8,
W. whereas four Member States of the EU-15 have not opened their labour markets for workers from the EU-8 Member States,
X. der henviser til, at 11 medlemsstater har meddelt Kommissionen, at de har besluttet at fortsætte med at anvende begrænsninger på deres arbejdsmarkeder med hensyn til statsborgere fra Rumænien og Bulgarien pr. 1. januar 2009,
X. whereas eleven Member States have notified the Commission of their decision to continue applying restrictions in their labour markets in respect of nationals of Romania and Bulgaria, as of 1 January 2009,
Anvendelse af direktiv 2004/38/EF
Application of D irective 2004/38/EC
5. opfordrer medlemsstater, der har sådanne dokumenter, til at vedtage samme format for personlige identitetspapirer for deres statsborgere og for unionsborgere fra andre medlemsstater uanset eventuelle forskelle i papirerne;
Calls on the Member States having such documents to adopt the same format for personal identity documents for their nationals and for Union citizens from other Member States, regardless of the differences which must be noted within the documents
Administrativ praksis, der ikke er i overensstemmelse med fællesskabsretten har betydelige negative følger for borgernes rettigheder.
Administrative practices, which are not in conformity with EC law have a significant negative impact on citizens' rights.
Eksempelvis har den hastige udbredelse af forskellige identifikationskort og opholdsbeviser i medlemsstaterne gjort det forvirrende og besværligt for borgerne i EU at benytte sig af deres ret til fri bevægelighed; i Spanien tildeler man ud over registreringsbeviset EU-borgere et udlændingeidentitetsnummer, der er nødvendigt for at arbejde eller blive registreret i det spanske socialsikringssystem, Frankrig har også bibeholdt et tvetydigt frivilligt opholdsbevis ud over det registreringsbevis, der udstedes til unionsborgere, og i medlemsstater som Tjekkiet, Sverige og Belgien forlanger myndighederne yderligere dokumenter for at udstede opholdsbeviser eller stiller krav, der ikke er opført i direktivet;
By way of example, the proliferation of different ID cards and residence cards within the Member States, has rendered the exercise by EU citizens of their right of free movement confusing and irksome; in Spain, in addition to the registration certificate, EU citizens are issued with a Foreigner Identity Number which is necessary in order to work or register with the Spanish social security system, France has maintained an ambiguous voluntary residence title additional to the registration certificate issued to Union citizens and, in Member States such as the Czech Republic, Sweden and Belgium, authorities request additional documents in order to issue residence cards or impose conditions which are not listed in the Directive. ;
I estisk og ungarsk lovgivning fastsættes ikke udtrykkeligt udelukkelsen af økonomiske hensyn i forbindelse med udstedelse af en udsendelsesordre.
Estonian and Hungarian legislation do not expressly provide for the exclusion of economic ends when imposing an expulsion order.
I ungarsk og rumænsk lovgivning er der ingen henvisning til undtagelse for tidligere straffedomme og generelt forebyggende formål. ; erindrer om, at undtagelserne vedrørende den offentlige orden ikke kan gøres gældende af økonomiske hensyn eller under henvisning til generelt forebyggende formål;
In Hungarian and Romanian legislation there is no reference to the exclusion of previous criminal convictions and general preventive aims. ; recalls that the public policy exceptions cannot be invoked to serve economic ends or to pursue general preventive aims;
12. opfordrer Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne til i gennemførelsen af direktiv 2004/38/EF at overveje de mulige diskriminerende virkninger af regler om social sikring og adgang til forsyningspligtydelser, som kan udgøre hindringer for den frie bevægelighed;
Calls on the Commission and Member States in the implementation of Directive 2004/38/EC to consider the potential discriminatory effects of social security regulations and access to services of general interest which could constitute barriers to free movement;
20. anerkender begrænsningerne vedrørende hjemtransport ved unionsborgeres dødsfald og opfordrer Kommissionen til at udarbejde en adfærdskodeks, som medlemsstaterne kan følge for at sikre, at det er en naturlig følge af borgernes frie bevægelighed;
Recognises the restrictions on repatriation of mortal remains of Union citizens and calls on the Commission to bring forward a Code of Conduct to which Member States could adhere to, in order to ensure that it is a corollary to the freedom of movement of citizens.
24. opfordrer Kommissionen til at kræve periodiske rapporter fra medlemsstaterne med statistiske oplysninger om den frie bevægelighed, f.eks. antallet af tilfælde, hvor indrejse og opholdsret blev nægtet, og udvisninger og begrundelsen herfor;
Calls on the Commission to require from Member States periodic reports including statistical data in relation to freedom of movement, for instance on the number of occasions when entry and residence rights were denied and of expulsions carried out and for which reason;
af Roberta Angelilli OG Mario Borghezio
submitted by Roberta Angelilli and Mario Borghezio
(jf. forretningsordenens artikel 48)
(Rule 48 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament)
BETÆNKNING AF VĂLEAN
ON THE VALEAN REPORT
– Vi gentager på det kraftigste betydningen af direktiv 38/2004/EF og understreger behovet for gennem dette direktiv at sikre unionsborgere fri bevægelighed;
- While we firmly reiterate the importance of Directive 38/2004 and stress the need to ensure, through that directive, freedom of movement for EU citizens;
– Vi er uenige i den fremgangsmåde, der valgt i denne betænkning, der omhandler områder, der henhører under medlemsstaternes enekompetencer, navnlig familieret, strafferet og lov og orden;
- We do not agree with the approach taken by the report, which goes into the merits of subjects which are within the exclusive competence of the Member States, in particular family law, criminal law and law and order;
– Vi finder endvidere fodnoten i betænkningen (betragtning S), der henviser til en formodet restriktiv fortolkning af begreberne "familiemedlem", "ethvert andet familiemedlem" og "partner" , uacceptabel.
- We also find unacceptable the footnote in the report (Recital S) referring to a presumed "restrictive interpretation" by Member States of the notion of "family member", of "any other family member" and of "partner".
Fodnoten kritiserer "en generel tendens imod anerkendelsen af den tredje/fjerde ægtefælle" og foreslår følgelig en bredere og tvetydig fortolkning af direktiv 38/2004/EF, der kan opfordre til svigagtig adfærd i form af proformaægteskaber eller endda den paradoksale anerkendelse af legitimiteten af polygami.
The footnote criticises the "general trend against the recognition of third/fourth spouses", proposing, therefore, a broad and ambiguous interpretation of Directive 38/2004 which could encourage the fraudulent practice of marriages of convenience, or even the paradoxical recognition of the legitimacy of polygamy.
A. der henviser til, at der skal tages hensyn til udkastet til den foreløbige betænkning om den sammenlignende undersøgelse af anvendelsen af direktiv 2004/38/EF om unionsborgeres og deres familiemedlemmers ret til at færdes og opholde sig frit på medlemsstaternes område, som Retsudvalget har anmodet om og European Citizen Action Service (ECAS) har udført,
A whereas consideration is to be given to the draft interim report of the ‘Comparative study on the application of Directive 2004/38/EC on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States’ requested by the Committee on Legal Affairs and delivered by European Citizen Action Service (ECAS),
2. bemærker med skuffelse, at direktivet kun er gennemført tilfredsstillende i Cypern, Grækenland, Finland, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal og Spanien;
Notes with disappointment that only in Cyprus, Greece, Finland, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal and Spain is the transposition of the Directive satisfactory;
6. bemærker, at gennemførelsen af princippet om "tilstrækkelige midler" i medlemsstaterne er årsag til forvirring blandt borgere i EU, da det ofte er upræcist defineret i national lovgivning på alle niveauer; påpeger, at dette vækker alvorlig bekymring, f.eks. i forbindelse med italiensk lovgivning, ifølge hvilken EU-borgere skal bevise ægtheden af deres tilstrækkelige midler;
Notes that the transposition of the "sufficient resources" principle within Member States gives rise to confusion among EU citizens as it is often ambiguously defined in the national legislation at all levels; points out that this gives rise to deep concern, for example in relation to Italian legislation which requires EU citizens to prove the authenticity of their sufficient resources;
On the stronger role of national parliaments under the institutional landscape provided by the Treaty of Lisbon in relation to an AFSJ see Carrera, S. and F. Geyer (2008).
On the stronger role of national parliaments under the institutional landscape provided by the Treaty of Lisbon in relation to an AFSJ see Carrera, S. and F. Geyer (2008).
On this point see Carlier, J.Y. and E. Guild (2006).
On this point see Carlier, J.Y. and E. Guild (2006).
Refer to inter alia Case C-413/99, Baumbast [2002] ECR I-07091 and Case 67/74, Carmelo Angelo Bonsignore v. Oberstadtdirektor der Stadt Köln [1975] ECR 00297.
Refer to inter alia Case C-413/99, Baumbast [2002] ECR I-07091 and Case 67/74, Carmelo Angelo Bonsignore v. Oberstadtdirektor der Stadt Köln [1975] ECR 00297.
15, and Case C-30/77, Régina v. Pierre Bouchereau [1977] ECR 01999, para.
15, and Case C-30/77, Régina v. Pierre Bouchereau [1977] ECR 01999, para.
https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CommDH(2008)18 ; European Union Fundamental Rights Agency, Incident Report: Violent attacks against Roma in the Ponticelli district of Naples, Italy; Available at:
https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CommDH(2008)18 ; European Union Fundamental Rights Agency, Incident Report: Violent attacks against Roma in the Ponticelli district of Naples, Italy; Available at:
Article 127 of the Law on the Legal Status of Aliens, Žin., 2006, Nr. 137-5199.
Article 127 of the Law on the Legal Status of Aliens, Žin., 2006, Nr. 137-5199.
Apap, J. (2002), Freedom of movement of persons: A practitioner’s handbook, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Apap, J. (2002), Freedom of movement of persons: A practitioner’s handbook, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Carlier, J.Y. and E. Guild (eds.) (2006), The Future of Free Movement of Persons in the EU , Collection du Centre des Droits de L’Homme de l’Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels: Bruylant.
Carlier, J.Y. and E. Guild (eds.) (2006), The Future of Free Movement of Persons in the EU , Collection du Centre des Droits de L’Homme de l’Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels: Bruylant.
Carrera, S. (2005), “What does free movement mean in theory and practice in an enlarged EU?”, European Law Journal , Vol.
Carrera, S. (2005), “What does free movement mean in theory and practice in an enlarged EU?”, European Law Journal , Vol.
Carrera, S. and F. Geyer (2008), ‘The reform treaty and justice and home affairs: implications for the common area of freedom, security and justice’ in Guild, E. and Geyer, F. (eds.), Security versus justice?
Carrera, S. and F. Geyer (2008), ‘The reform treaty and justice and home affairs: implications for the common area of freedom, security and justice’ in Guild, E. and Geyer, F. (eds.), Security versus justice?
Carrera, S. and Merlino, M. (2008), The European Court of Justice and Enacting Citizenship , State of the Art Report, ENACT (Enacting European Citizenship), retrievable from
Carrera, S. and Merlino, M. (2008), The European Court of Justice and Enacting Citizenship , State of the Art Report, ENACT (Enacting European Citizenship), retrievable from
Craig, P. and G. De Búrca (2007), EU LAW, Text, Cases, and Materials , fourth edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. and G. De Búrca (2007), EU LAW, Text, Cases, and Materials , fourth edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guild, E. (2007b), “Citizens without a Constitution, Borders without a State: EU free Movement of Persons”, in A. Baldaccini, E. Guild and H. Toner (eds), Whose Freedom Security and Justice?
Guild, E. (2007b), “Citizens without a Constitution, Borders without a State: EU free Movement of Persons”, in A. Baldaccini, E. Guild and H. Toner (eds), Whose Freedom Security and Justice?
Kostakopoulou, T. (2007), “European Citizenship: Writing the Future”, European Law Journal , Special Issue on EU Citizenship, Vol.
Kostakopoulou, T. (2007), “European Citizenship: Writing the Future”, European Law Journal , Special Issue on EU Citizenship, Vol.
Minderhoud, P. (2009), ‘Access to Social Assistance Benefits and Directive 2004/38’, in E. Guild, K. Groenendijk and S. Carrera (eds), Illiberal Liberal States: Immigration, Citizenship and Integration in the EU , Ashgate Publishing: Hampshire, forthcoming.
Minderhoud, P. (2009), ‘Access to Social Assistance Benefits and Directive 2004/38’, in E. Guild, K. Groenendijk and S. Carrera (eds), Illiberal Liberal States: Immigration, Citizenship and Integration in the EU , Ashgate Publishing: Hampshire, forthcoming.
om styring i forbindelse med den fælles fiskeripolitik: Europa-Parlamentet, regionale rådgivende råd og øvrige aktører
on Governance within the CFP: the European Parliament, the Regional Advisory Councils and other actors
– der henviser til Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 2371/2002 af 20. december 2002 om bevarelse og bæredygtig udnyttelse af fiskeressourcerne som led i den fælles fiskeripolitik
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy