natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Med Lissabontraktatens ikrafttræden den 1. december 2009 blev Det Europæiske Fællesskab erstattet af Den Europæiske Union, og der blev derudover foretaget ændringer i procedurerne for indgåelsen af associeringsaftaler.
As a result of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has succeeded the European Community and, furthermore, changes have been made to the procedures for the conclusion of association agreements.
I henhold til artikel 218, stk. 6, afsnit 2, litra a), i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde skal indgåelsen af associeringsaftaler nu altid godkendes af Europa-Parlamentet.
Under Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Parliament's consent is now required, in all cases, in order to conclude association agreements.
I medfør af denne bestemmelse behandler Europa-Parlamentet således igen forslaget til Rådets afgørelse om Liechtensteins indgåelse af en tiltrædelsesprotokol for Dublinaftalen med Schweiz.
In line with that provision, Parliament is again addressing the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a protocol on the accession of Liechtenstein to the Dublin agreement.
Ordføreren glæder sig over, at Europa-Parlamentet igen behandler udkastet til Rådets afgørelse, og at forhandlingerne om Liechtensteins associering i Dublinaftalen med Schweiz dermed fortsætter.
The rapporteur welcomes the renewed referral to Parliament of the draft Council decision and thus the continuation of the negotiations on the association of Liechtenstein with the Dublin agreement with Switzerland.
Som Parlamentet allerede har anmodet om ved førstebehandlingen, skal Europa-Parlamentet godkende indgåelsen af denne protokol med Liechtenstein.
The consent of Parliament must be obtained, as it called for at first reading, in order to conclude this protocol with Liechtenstein.
Ordføreren støtter indgåelsen af protokollen.
The rapporteur supports conclusion of the protocol.
I betragtning af at forhandlingerne med Liechtenstein er afsluttet med succes, og at retsgrundlaget nu er ændret, anbefaler ordføreren, at der meddeles godkendelse.
In the light of the successfully concluded negotiations with Liechtenstein and the amended legal basis, she recommends that consent be given.
om Rådets førstebehandlingsholdning med henblik på vedtagelse af Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning om ændring af forordning (EF) nr. 1889/2006 om oprettelse af et finansieringsinstrument til fremme af demokrati og menneskerettigheder på verdensplan
on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1889/2006 on establishing a financing instrument for the promotion of democracy and human rights worldwide
PE 456.703v02-00
PE 456.703v02-00
– der henviser til Rådets førstebehandlingsholdning (16446/1/2010 – C7‑0427/2010 ),
– having regard to the Council position at first reading (16446/1/2010 – C7‑0427/2010 ),
Vedtagne tekster af 21.10.2010, P7_TA(2010)0380 . til Kommissionens forslag til Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet ( KOM(2009)0194 ),
Texts adopted of 21.10.2010, P7_TA(2010)0380 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0194 ),
– der henviser til indstilling ved andenbehandling fra Udenrigsudvalget ( A7‑0014/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0014/2011 ),
* Ændringer: Ny eller ændret tekst er markeret med fede typer og kursiv ; udgået tekst er markeret med symbolet ▌. *
* Amendments: new or amended text is highlighted in bold italics ; deletions are indicated by the symbol ▌. *
under henvisning til traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde, særlig artikel 209, stk. 1, og artikel 212,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 209(1) and Article 212 thereof,
Europa-Parlamentets holdning af 21.10.2010 (endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT) og Rådets førstebehandlingsholdning af 10. december 2010 (endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT).
Position of the European Parliament of 21 October 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and position of the Council at first reading of 10 December 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Europa-Parlamentets holdning af … (endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT). , og
Position of the European Parliament of ... (not yet published in the Official Journal). ,
(1) For at gøre Fællesskabets eksterne bistand mere effektiv og gennemsigtig blev der i 2006 indført nye rammer for planlægning og levering af bistand.
(1) A new framework for planning and delivering assistance was established in 2006 in order to make the Community's external assistance more effective and transparent.
Dette omfatter Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1085/2006 af 17. juli 2006 om oprettelse af et instrument til førtiltrædelsesbistand (IPA)
It contains Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 of 17 July 2006 establishing an Instrument for Pre‑Accession Assistance (IPA)
(2) Gennemførelsen af disse forordninger har vist, at der er inkonsekvens med hensyn til dispensation fra princippet om ikke at anvende Unionens finansiering til at dække omkostninger i forbindelse med skatter, told og andre afgifter.
(2) In implementing those Regulations inconsistencies have emerged regarding exceptions to the principle of non‑eligibility for Union financing of costs related to taxes, duties and other charges.
I lyset heraf foreslås det at ændre de relevante bestemmelser i forordning (EF) nr. 1889/2006, så den tilpasses de øvrige instrumenter.
It is therefore proposed to amend the relevant provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1889/2006 in order to align it with the other instruments.
(3) I overensstemmelse med artikel 5, stk. 4, i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union går denne forordning ikke ud over, hvad der er nødvendigt for at nå det tilstræbte mål.
(3) This Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objective pursued, in accordance with Article 5(4) of the Treaty on European Union.
(3a) Kommissionen bør tillægges beføjelser til at vedtage delegerede retsakter i henhold til artikel 290 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde i forbindelse med strategipapirer, eftersom disse strategipapirer er et supplement til forordning (EF) nr. 1889/2006 og finder generel anvendelse.
(3a) The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of strategy papers, as those strategy papers supplement Regulation (EC) No 1889/2006 and are of general application.
(4) Forordning (EF) nr. 1889/2006 bør derfor ændres i overensstemmelse hermed –
(4) Regulation (EC) No 1889/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly,
I forordning (EF) nr. 1889/2006 foretages følgende ændring:
Regulation (EC) No 1889/2006 is hereby amended as follows:
(1) Artikel 5, stk. 3, affattes således:
(1) Article 5(3) is replaced by the following:
Strategipapirerne og alle ændringer eller udvidelser heraf vedtages af Kommissionen ved hjælp af delegerede retsakter efter proceduren i artikel 17 og med forbehold af betingelserne i artikel 17a og 17b."
Strategy papers, and any revisions or extensions thereof, shall be adopted by the Commission by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 17, and subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 17a and 17b.";
(2) Artikel 6, stk. 3, affattes således:
(2) Article 6(3) is replaced by the following:
De årlige handlingsprogrammer og eventuelle ændringer og udvidelser heraf vedtages af Kommissionen under hensyntagen til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets udtalelser."
Annual Action Programmes, and any revisions or extensions thereof, shall be adopted by the Commission taking into account the opinions of the European Parliament and of the Council.";
(3) Artikel 7, stk. 3 og 4, affattes således:
(3) in Article 7, paragraphs 3 and 4 are replaced by the following:
Hvis udgifterne til sådanne foranstaltninger svarer til eller overstiger 3 000 000 EUR, vedtager Kommissionen dem under hensyntagen til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets udtalelser.
Where the cost of such measures is equal to or exceeds EUR 3 000 000, the Commission shall adopt them taking into account the opinions of the European Parliament and of the Council.
I tilfælde af særforanstaltninger til under 3 000 000 EUR sender Kommissionen senest 10 arbejdsdage efter at have truffet sin afgørelse meddelelse herom til Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet til orientering."
For Special Measures costing below EUR 3 000 000, the Commission shall send the measures to the European Parliament and to the Council for information within 10 working days of adopting its decision.";
(4) Artikel 9, stk. 2, affattes således:
(4) Article 9(2) is replaced by the following:
Kommissionen underretter regelmæssigt Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet om de ad hoc-foranstaltninger, der gennemføres."
The Commission shall regularly inform the European Parliament and the Council of the ad hoc measures carried out.";
(5) Artikel 13, stk. 6, affattes således:
(5) Article 13(6) is replaced by the following:
Unionens bistand må i princippet ikke anvendes til at betale skatter, told og andre afgifter i modtagerlandene."
Union assistance shall not in principle be used for paying taxes, duties or charges in beneficiary countries." ;
(6) Artikel 16, stk. 2, affattes således:
(6) Article 16(2) is replaced by the following:
Resultaterne udnyttes ved udformning af programmer og tildeling af ressourcer."
The results shall feed back into programme design and resource allocation.";
(7) Artikel 17 affattes således:
(7) Article 17 is replaced by the following:
Kommissionen tillægges beføjelser til at vedtage de delegerede retsakter, der er omhandlet i artikel 5, stk. 3, for denne forordnings gyldighedsperiode.
The power to adopt delegated acts as referred to in Article 5(3) shall be conferred on the Commission for the period of application of this Regulation.
Kommissionen tillægges beføjelser til at vedtage delegerede retsakter med forbehold af betingelserne i artikel 17a og 17b.
The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 17a and 17b.
Den i artikel 5 omhandlede delegation af beføjelser kan til enhver tid tilbagekaldes af Europa-Parlamentet eller Rådet.
The delegation of power referred to in Article 5 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Gør Europa-Parlamentet eller Rådet indsigelse mod en delegeret retsakt inden for den i stk. 1 nævnte frist, træder den ikke i kraft.
If either the European Parliament or the Council objects to the delegated act within the period referred to in paragraph 1, it shall not enter into force.
Den institution, der gør indsigelse mod den delegerede retsakt, anfører begrundelsen herfor."
The institution which objects shall state the reasons for objecting to the delegated act.".
Denne forordning træder i kraft dagen efter offentliggørelsen i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende .
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Udfærdiget i
Done at ...,
Finansieringsinstrument til fremme af demokrati og menneskerettigheder på verdensplan (ændring af forordning (EF) nr. 1889/2006)
Financing instrument for the promotion of democracy and human rights worldwide (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1889/2006)
om anmodning om ophævelse af Tamás Deutschs immunitet
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Tamás Deutsch
PE 454.685v01-00
PE 454.685v02-00
– der henviser til anmodning af 9. juni 2010 fra de ungarske retslige myndigheder om ophævelse af Tamás Deutschs immunitet, hvorom der blev givet meddelelse på plenarmødet den 8. juli 2010,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Tamás Deutsch, forwarded by the Hungarian judicial authorities on 9 June 2010 and announced in plenary sitting on 8 July 2010,
– der har hørt Tamás Deutsch, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 7, stk. 3,
– having heard Tamás Deutsch in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– der henviser til artikel 8 og 9 i protokollen af 8. april 1965 vedrørende Den Europæiske Unions privilegier og immuniteter samt artikel 6, stk. 2, i akten af 20. september 1976 om almindelige direkte valg af medlemmerne af Europa-Parlamentet,
– having regard to Articles 8 and 9 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– der henviser til artikel 10, stk. 2, i lov LVII af 2004 om den retlige status for ungarske medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet, artikel 5, stk. 1, i lov LV af 1990 om den retlige status for medlemmer af det ungarske parlament og artikel 12, stk. 1, i lov LVII af 2004,
– having regard to Section 10(2) of Act LVII of 2004 on the legal status of Hungarian Members of the European Parliament, Section 5(1) of Act LV of 1990 on the legal status of Members of the Hungarian Parliament and Section 12(1) of Act LVII of 2004,
– der henviser til betænkning fra Retsudvalget ( A7‑0015/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0015/2011 ),
A. der henviser til, at en ungarsk statsborger har anlagt straffesag mod Tamás Deutsch, medlem af Europa-Parlamentet, som ved retten i Budapests andet og tredje distrikt er tiltalt for ærekrænkelse efter den ungarske straffelovs artikel 179, stk. 2, litra b) og c),
A. whereas criminal proceedings have been brought by a Hungarian citizen against Tamás Deutsch, a Member of the European Parliament, who is accused in the Court of the 2 nd and 3 rd Districts of Budapest of defamation under Section 179(2)(b-c) of the Hungarian Criminal Code,
B. der henviser til, at Europa-Parlamentets medlemmer under Parlamentets sessioner i henhold til artikel 9 i protokollen af 8. april 1965 vedrørende Den Europæiske Unions privilegier og immuniteter på deres eget lands område nyder de immuniteter, der tilstås medlemmerne af deres lands lovgivende forsamling, og at immuniteten ikke kan påberåbes af et medlem, som gribes på fersk gerning, og ikke kan hindre Europa-Parlamentets ret til at ophæve et af dets medlemmers immunitet,
B. whereas, according to Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of their parliament; whereas immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is caught in the act of committing an offence; and whereas this does not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members,
C. der henviser til, at et medlem af Europa-Parlamentet ifølge artikel 10, stk. 2, i lov LVII af 2004 om den retlige status for ungarske medlemmer af Europa-Parlamentet nyder samme immunitet som et medlem af det ungarske parlament,
C. whereas, according to Section 10(2) of Act LVII of 2004 on the legal status of Hungarian Members of the European Parliament, a Member of the European Parliament is accorded the same immunity as a Member of the Hungarian Parliament,
D. der henviser til, at der ifølge artikel 5, stk. 1, i lov LV af 1990 om den retlige status for medlemmer af det ungarske parlament kun kan anlægges eller føres straffesager mod et medlem med forudgående samtykke fra det ungarske parlament, og at Europa-Parlamentet i henhold til artikel 12, stk. 1, i lov LVII af 2004 træffer afgørelse om ophævelse af immuniteten for et medlem af Europa-Parlamentet,
D. whereas according to Section 5(1) of Act LV of 1990 on the legal status of Members of the Hungarian Parliament, criminal proceedings may be launched or pursued against the Member only with the prior consent of the Hungarian Parliament and pursuant to Section 12(1) of Act LVII of 2004 the European Parliament shall decide on the suspension of the immunity of a Member of the European Parliament,
E. der henviser til, at Deutsch er tiltalt for ærekrænkelse, som hævdes at være begået som følge af udtalelser om den anklagende part under et radioprogram den 25. marts 2010, som han var inviteret til i sin egenskab af politiker og medlem af Europa-Parlamentet,
E. whereas Mr Deutsch is charged with an offence of defamation allegedly committed as a result of statements made about the accuser in the course of a radio programme broadcast on 25 March 2010 to which he was invited in his capacity as a politician and a Member of the European Parliament,
F. der henviser til, at det derfor bør fastslås, at Deutsch fremsatte meningstilkendegivelser under udøvelsen af sit hverv som medlem af Europa-Parlamentet,
F. whereas it is therefore appropriate to state that Mr Deutsch expressed opinions in the performance of his duties as the Member of the European Parliament,
På mødet den 8. juli 2010 meddelte formanden i henhold til forretningsordenens artikel 6, stk. 2, at han havde modtaget en skrivelse af 9. juni 2010 fra de ungarske retslige myndigheder, hvori der blev anmodet om ophævelse af Tamás Deutschs parlamentariske immunitet.
At the sitting of 8 July 2010 the President announced, under Rule 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, that he had received a letter sent by the Hungarian judicial authorities on 9 June 2010 requesting the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Tamás Deutsch.
Retten i Budapests andet og tredje distrikt anmodede Europa-Parlamentet om at ophæve immuniteten for medlemmet Tamás Deutsch, som der er anlagt straffesag mod ved den pågældende ret.
The Court of the 2nd and 3rd Districts of Budapest asked the European Parliament to waive the immunity of its Member, Tamás Deutsch, against whom criminal proceedings are being brought in that court.
Tamás Deutsch er tiltalt for ærekrænkelse i henhold til den ungarske straffelovs artikel 179, stk. 2, litra b) og c).
Tamás Deutsch is accused in the proceedings pending in the Budapest Court of the criminal offence of defamation under Section 179(2)(b-c) of the Hungarian Criminal Code.
a ) på deres eget lands område de immuniteter, der tilstås medlemmerne af deres lands lovgivende forsamling
a. in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;
b ) på en anden medlemsstats område fritagelse for enhver form for tilbageholdelse og retsforfølgning.
b. in the territory of other Member States, immunity from any measure or detention and from legal proceedings.
Proceduren i Europa-Parlamentet er fastsat i forretningsordenens artikel 6 og 7.
The procedure in the European Parliament is governed by Articles 6 and 7 of the Rules of Procedure.
På baggrund af ovenstående bør anmodningen fra retten i Budapests andet og tredje distrikt behandles som en anmodning om, at Europa-Parlamentet ophæver Tamás Deutschs immunitet, så han kan strafforfølges, således som det er muligt efter ungarsk ret.
In view of the above, the request by the Court of the 2nd and 3rd District of Budapest should be treated as a request for a decision of the European Parliament to waive the immunity of Tamás Deutsch so that he can be subjected to criminal liability, as is possible under Hungarian law.
Hvad angår anvendeligheden af protokollens artikel 8 skal det bemærkes, at anklagerne mod Tamás Deutsch vedrører meningstilkendegivelser fremsat under udøvelsen af hans hverv som medlem af Europa-Parlamentet.
As far as the applicability of Article 8 of the Protocol is concerned, it should be noted that the charges brought against Tamás Deutsch refer to opinions expressed in the performance of his duties as a member of the European Parliament.
Eftersom anklagerne mod Tamás Deutsch vedrører handlinger, der blev begået i Ungarn, hvor han var statsborger på det pågældende tidspunkt, er den eneste anvendelige del af artikel 9 den del, hvori det hedder: "Under Europa-Parlamentets [sessioner] nyder medlemmerne: a) på deres eget lands område de immuniteter, der tilstås medlemmerne af deres lands lovgivende forsamling" .
As for Article 9, given that the charges brought against Tamás Deutsch refer to an offence allegedly committed in Hungary, whose citizenship he enjoyed at the material time, the only applicable part is the one pursuant to which ‘ during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members shall enjoy: a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament ’.
Der må siges at være en sammenhæng mellem Deutschs politiske virksomhed og hans udtalelser i radioprogrammet.
It has to be argued that there is a nexus between Mr Deutsch's political activity and the statements made on the radio programme.
I de udtalelser, der gengives i den stævning, den anklagende part har indgivet, kommenterede Deutsch rent faktisk blot offentlige emner baseret på dokumenter, der var offentliggjort i sommeren 2002 i avisen Népszabadaság.
As a matter of fact, in his statements reported in the writ of summons filed by the accuser Mr Deutsch merely commented on facts in the public domain based on documents which were published in the summer of 2002 in the Né pszabadas á g newspaper.
Den anklagende part hævder, at de pågældende dokumenter var forfalskninger, da deres indhold ikke var i overensstemmelse med sandheden, og at han orienterede pressen om selvmodsigelserne i dokumenterne i avisen Magyar Nemzet den 22. august 2002 og har gjort det gentagne gange siden da.
The accuser claims that those documents were forgeries as their content did not conform to the truth and that he informed the press of the contradictions in the documents in the Magyar Nemzet newspaper on 22 August 2002 and has continued to do so since then.
Det skal endvidere bemærkes, at de pågældende udtalelser drejede sig om ungarsk politik og, som anført af Deutsch, også vedrørte EU-spørgsmål, for så vidt som den anklagende part var kandidat til et vigtigt EU-embede.
It should also be observed that the comments pertained to Hungarian political life and, as stated by Mr Deutsch, referred also to EU affairs in that the accuser ran for an important EU office.
Det må derfor konkluderes, at Deutsch med sine kommentarer udøvede sit hverv som medlem af Parlamentet, idet han tilkendegav sin mening om et spørgsmål af almen interesse for sine vælgere.
It must be concluded therefore that in commenting on that he was carrying out his duty as a Member of Parliament in expressing his opinion on a matter of public interest to his constituents.
Deutsch udførte kort sagt sit arbejde som medlem af Parlamentet.
In short, Mr Deutsch was carrying out his duty as a Member of Parliament.
På grundlag af denne redegørelse og de dokumenter, der er til rådighed, må det konkluderes, at Tamás Deutschs immunitet ikke bør ophæves.
On the basis of the foregoing and the available documents, it has to be concluded that Tamás Deutsch's immunity should not be waived.
På grundlag af ovenstående betragtninger, i henhold til forretningsordenens artikel 6, stk. 2, og efter at have overvejet argumenterne for og imod ophæv else af medlemmets immunitet anbefaler Retsudvalget , at Europa- Parlamentet ikke ophæver Tamás Deutsch s parlamentariske immunitet.
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, after considering the reasons for and against waiving the Member’s immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should not waive the parliamentary immunity of Tamás Deutsch.
om kvinders rolle inden for landbruget og i landdistrikterne
on the role of women in agriculture and rural areas
PE 441.174v02-00
PE 441.174v03-00
om kvinders rolle inden for landbruget og i landdistrikter
on the role of women in agriculture and rural areas
– der henviser til traktaten om Den Europæiske Union, særlig artikel 2 og 3, og traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde, særlig artikel 8, 153 og 157,
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union, particularly Articles 2 und 3 thereof, and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, particularly Articles 8, 153 and 157 thereof,