natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om retningslinjerne for 2013-budgetproceduren, Sektion I - Europa-Parlamentet, Sektion II - Rådet, Sektion IV - Domstolen, Sektion V - Revisionsretten, Sektion VI - Det Europæiske Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg, Sektion VII - Regionsudvalget, Sektion VIII - Den Europæiske Ombudsmand, Sektion IX - Den Europæiske Tilsynsførende for Databeskyttelse og Sektion X (2012/2001(BUD))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the guidelines for the 2013 budget procedure, Section I – European Parliament, Section II – Council, Section IV – Court of Justice, Section V – Court of Auditors, Section VI – European Economic and Social Committee, Section VII – Committee of the Regions, Section VIII – European Ombudsman, Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor, Section X – European External Action Service (2012/2001(BUD))
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om den aktuelle status for den foreslåede flerårige plan for den vestlige bestand af almindelig hestemakrel og fiskeriets udnyttelse af denne bestand (2011/2937(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the state of play regarding the proposed multi-annual plan for the western stock of Atlantic horse mackerel and the fisheries exploiting that stock (2011/2937(RSP))
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om den fælles fiskeripolitiks bidrag til produktionen af offentlige goder (2011/2899(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the contribution of the common fisheries policy to the production of public goods (2011/2899(RSP))
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om den seneste politiske udvikling i Ungarn (2012/2511(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the recent political developments in Hungary (2012/2511(RSP))
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om det forestående præsidentvalg i Rusland (2012/2505(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the upcoming presidential election in Russia (2012/2505(RSP))
Aftale mellem EU og Marokko vedrørende gensidige liberaliseringsforanstaltninger for landbrugs- og fiskeriprodukter
EU/Morocco Agreement concerning reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products and fishery products
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om aftalen mellem EU og Marokko vedrørende gensidige liberaliseringsforanstaltninger for landbrugs- og fiskeriprodukter (2012/2522(RSP)
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the Agreement between the EU and Morocco concerning reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products and fishery products (2012/2522(RSP))
Europa-Parlamentets lovgivningsmæssige beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om udkast til Rådets afgørelse om indgåelse af en aftale i form af brevveksling mellem Den Europæiske Union og Kongeriget Marokko om gensidige liberaliseringsforanstaltninger for landbrugsprodukter, forarbejdede landbrugsprodukter og fisk og fiskevarer, udskiftning af protokol nr. 1, 2 og 3 og bilagene hertil og ændring af Euro-Middelhavs-aftalen om oprettelse af en associering mellem De Europæiske Fællesskaber og deres medlemsstater på den ene side og Kongeriget Marokko på den anden side (15975/2010 – C7-0432/2010 – 2010/0248(NLE))
European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 February 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco concerning reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products, processed agricultural products, fish and fishery products, the replacement of Protocols 1, 2 and 3 and their Annexes and amendments to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part (15975/2010 – C7-0432/2010 – 2010/0248(NLE))
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om situationen i Syrien (2012/2543(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the situation in Syria (2012/2543(RSP))
19. samling i Menneskerettighedsrådet i Genève
United Nation's Human Rights Council
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om Parlamentets holdning med henblik på den 19. samling i FN's Menneskerettighedsråd (2012/2530(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on Parliament's position on the 19th Session of the UN Human Rights Council (2012/2530(RSP))
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om andragende 0924/2011 af Dan Pescod, britisk statsborger, for »European Blind Union« (EBU) og »Royal National Institute of Blind People« (RNIB), om blindes adgang til bøger og andre trykte produkter (2011/2894(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on Petition 0924/2011 by Dan Pescod (British), on behalf of the European Blind Union (EBU)/Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB), on access by blind people to books and other printed products (2011/2894(RSP))
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om forslag til Rådets afgørelse om indgåelse af den regionale konvention om pan-Euro-Middelhavsregler for præferenceoprindelse (2012/2519(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (2012/2519(RSP))
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om forslag til Rådets afgørelse om indgåelse af den regionale konvention om pan-Euro-Middelhavsregler for præferenceoprindelse (11343/2010 – C7-0207/2011 – 2010/0093(NLE))
European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 February 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (11343/2010 – C7-0207/2011 – 2010/0093(NLE))
Fremtiden for GMES
Future of Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES)
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om fremtiden for GMES (2012/2509(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the future of GMES (2012/2509(RSP))
Dødsstraf i Hviderusland, især sagen om Dzmitrij Kanavalau og Uladzislau Kavalyou
Death penalty in Belarus, in particular the cases of Dzmitry Kanavalau and Uladzislau Kavalyou
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om dødsstraf i Hviderusland, navnlig sagerne om Dzmitrij Kanavalau og Uladzislau Kavalyou (2012/2539(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the death penalty in Belarus, in particular the cases of Dzmitry Kanavalau and Uladzislau Kavalyou (2012/2539(RSP))
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om den seneste udvikling i Egypten (2012/2541(RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on Egypt: recent developments (2012/2541(RSP))
Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 16. februar 2012 om dødsstraffen i Japan (2012/2542/RSP))
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the death penalty in Japan (2012/2542(RSP))
-//EP//TEXT TA 20120216 ITEMS DOC XML V0//DA
-//EP//TEXT TA 20120216 ITEMS DOC XML V0//EN
ACTA-aftalen om bekæmpelse af varemærkeforfalskning
Everything you need to know about ACTA
ACTA- aftalen har vist sig at være kontroversiel lige siden den først blev foreslået.
ACTA logo The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) has proved to be controversial ever since it was first proposed.
Formålet med aftalen er at fremme en mere effektiv håndhævelse af intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder på internationalt plan.
The agreement is aimed at more effectively enforcing intellectual property rights on an international level.
Mange udviklede lande mener, at deres økonomier lider stor skade på grund af varemærkeforfalskning og piratkopiering.
Many developed countries worry that their economies suffer great damage due to counterfeiting and piracy.
Til gengæld er modstanderne af aftalen bekymrede for, at den vil favorisere de store virksomheders interesser på bekostning af borgernes rettigheder.
However, opponents are concerned that it will favour large companies' interests at the expense of citizens' rights.
ACTA´s skæbne ligger nu i hænderne på Europa-Parlamentet, da aftalen ikke kan træde i kraft i EU uden Parlamentets samtykke.
Its fate now lies in the hands of the European Parliament as without its consent ACTA will not be able to enter into force in the European Union.
Kommissionen meddelte den 22. februar 2012, at den agter at forelægge ACTA- aftalen for EU-domstolen.
The European Commission announced on 22 February 2012 that it will refer ACTA to the European Court of Justice for a ruling on the agreement.
Parlamentet vil afvente Domstolens dom, før der drages yderligere konklusioner.
Parliament will wait for the Court's ruling before drawing any conclusions.
I denne temasektion kan du finde alt, der er værd at vide om ACTA- aftalen og Europa-Parlamentets holdning.
Here you will find everything you need to know about ACTA and how the Parliament will come to a decision.
Vi vil løbende opdatere sektionen med artikler, pressemeddelelser og nyttige links til relevante dokumenter.
It will contain the latest updates, details on how and when to follow committee meetings covering ACTA on the Parliamentary website, as well as useful links to relevant documents.
ACTA- aftalen: spørgsmål og svar
What you should know about ACTA
ACTA-aftalen om bekæmpelse af varemærkeforfalskning og ophavsretskrænkelser er blevet undertegnet af 30 lande på verdensplan, men kan først træde i kraft efter Europa-Parlamentets samtykke.
Map showing which countries have signed ACTA ACTA, a controversial agreement about counterfeiting and online copyright infringements, has been signed so far by 30 countries.
Parlamentet vil med andre ord være i stand til at enten at godkende eller forkaste aftalen.
In coming months Parliament will be able to decide its fate in the EU by either approving or rejecting it.
Men hvad handler det hele om?
But what is this all about?
Hvilken rolle vil Europa-Parlamentet spille, og hvordan kan du følge begivenhederne?
How will the Parliament come to a decision and how will you be able to follow the process?
Læs mere nedenfor.
Find out more in this briefing.
Hvad handler ACTA-aftalen om?
What is ACTA about?
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) tager sigte på at skabe en mere effektiv håndhævelse af intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder på internationalt plan.
The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) is aimed at more effectively enforcing intellectual property rights on an international level.
Mange udviklede lande mener, at deres økonomier lider stor skade på grund af varemærkeforfalskning og piratkopiering.
Many countries are worried that their economies suffer great damage due to counterfeiting and piracy.
OECD anslog i 2005, at den internationale handel med forfalskede og piratkopierede varer udgjorde omkring 200 milliarder dollars.
OECD estimated in 2005 that international trade in counterfeit and pirated products amounted to $200 billion, excluding digital products.
Hvad vil være omfattet af aftalen?
What will be covered by it?
Alt fra kopivarer til ophavsretskrænkelser på internettet.
Anything from counterfeit goods to copyright infringements on the internet.
Hvem deltager i ACTA?
Who takes part in ACTA?
ACTA blev forhandlet mellem EU, USA, Australien, Canada, Japan, Mexico, Marokko, New Zealand, Singapore, Sydkorea og Schweiz.
ACTA was negotiated between the EU and its member states, the US, Australia, Canada, Japan, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Switzerland.
Når aftalen er trådt i kraft, kan ethvert medlem af Verdenshandelsorganisationen ansøge om at tiltræde.
Once the agreement is in force, then any member of the World Trade Organisation can apply to join.
Hvorfor er aftalen kontroversiel?
Why is it controversial?
Endelig er forhandlingerne også blevet kritiseret for at have været ført bag lukkede døre uden inddragelse af repræsentanter for civilsamfundet og udviklingslandene.
In addition the negotiations have been denounced for a perceived lack of transparency as civil society groups and developing countries have not been involved.
Hvilke lande har allerede underskrevet aftalen?
Which countries have already signed it?
I EU er aftalen blevet undertegnet af alle medlemsstater, bortset fra Cypern, Estland, Slovakiet, Tyskland og Holland.
In the EU it has already been signed by all member states except Cyprus, Estonia, Slovakia, Germany and the Netherlands.
Uden for EU er aftalen blevet underskrevet af Australien, Canada, Japan, Marokko, New Zealand, Singapore, Sydkorea og USA.
Outside the EU it has already been signed by Australia, Canada, Japan, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and the US.
Hvorfor er Europa-Parlamentets rolle afgørende?
Why is the role of the European Parliament crucial?
Parlamentet skal give sit samtykke, før ACTA-aftalen kan træde i kraft.
The Parliament has to give its consent before ACTA can enter into force in the EU.
Siden indførelsen af Lissabontraktaten, har Parlamentet haft ret til at nedlægge veto mod næsten alle internationale handelsaftaler.
Since the Lisbon Treaty, the Parliament has the right to veto most of the international agreements concluded by the EU.
Hvilke kompetencer har Europa-Parlamentet i forhold til aftalen?
What options are available to the European Parliament?
Parlamentet har ikke kompetence til at ændre aftaleteksten, men har derimod beføjelse til enten at godkende eller afvise teksten.
The Parliament is not able to make any changes to it, being formally empowered to either approve or reject it.
Parlamentet har desuden mulighed for at forelægge teksten for EU-Domstolen for at vurdere aftalens forenelighed med EU-retten.
Since there is no legal deadline for a response, it is theoretically possible that the Parliament could let the matter pend indefinitely, an option which would in effect prevent ACTA entering into force in the EU, as its explicit consent is required for it to do so.
Hvis Parlamentet vælger at gøre dette, kan aftalen ikke træde i kraft før Domstolens afgørelse.
Parliament will wait for the Court's ruling before drawing any conclusions.
Hvordan vil Europa-Parlamentet nå frem til en afgørelse?
How will the European Parliament come to a decision?
Det forberedende arbejde finder sted i de parlamentariske udvalg.
The preparatory work will be done by the parliamentary committees.
Udvalget om international handel er det ansvarlige udvalg og vil komme med den endelige anbefaling om, hvorvidt Parlamentet skal godkende eller afvise ACTA.
The committee on international trade will be in charge and as such will come up with a recommendation for the Parliament to either approve or reject ACTA.
David Martin (S&D, UK) er ansvarlig for udarbejdelsen af Parlamentets holdning.
British MEP David Martin, a member of the S&D group, has been chosen by the committee to draft the position of the Parliament.
Der vil dog være fire andre udvalg, som vil fremlægge deres holdning til ACTA: udvalget om industri, forskning og energi, retsudvalget, udvalget om borgernes rettigheder og retlige og indre anliggender og udviklingsudvalget.
However, there will be four other committees which will deliver their opinions on ACTA: the committee on industry, research and energy; the committee on legal affairs; the committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs; and the committee on development.
Drøftelserne forventes at vare i flere måneder.
They will spend several months talking to as many stakeholders and interested parties as possible in order to draw on their knowledge and expertise and come to an informed decision.
Udvalgsmedlemmerne vil inddrage så mange berørte parter som muligt og trække på deres viden og ekspertise med henblik på at nå frem til en informeret beslutning.
Many, if not all, of their meetings will be broadcast live on the Parliament's website.
Du kan følge de fleste af møderne direkte på Parlamentets hwebsted.
Once the recommendation to MEPs is available, it will be made publicly accessible.
Parlamentet vil som helhed tage stilling til ACTA- aftalen under et plenarmøde.
The Parliament will then vote on ACTA during a plenary session, which people will be able to follow live on the website.
Hvad er Europa-Parlamentets holdning til ACTA på nuværende tidspunkt?
What has the European Parliament said so far about ACTA?
Cypern, Estland, Slovakiet, Tyskland og Holland vil stadig skulle underskrive aftalen, og alle medlemslande vil stadig skulle ratificere den, før den kan træde i kraft.
Cyprus, Estonia, Slovakia, Germany and the Netherlands would still have to sign the agreement and all member states would still have to ratify it before it can enter into force in the EU.
Hvad sker der, hvis Europa-Parlamentet forkaster aftalen?
What happens if the European Parliament rejects it?
ACTA vil ikke være i stand til at træde i kraft i EU.
ACTA will not be able to enter into force in the EU.
Ingen aftale vil være mulig uden samtykke fra Parlamentet.
No agreement would be possible without the consent of the Parliament.
Men hvis de seks lande uden for EU ratificerer aftalen, vil den træde i kraft i disse lande.
However, if six countries outside the EU still ratify it then the agreement will enter into force there.
Hvordan vil jeg være i stand til at finde frem til de seneste nyhedder om ACTA- drøftelserne i Europa-Parlamentet?
How will I be able to find out the latest developments on this in the European Parliament?
Denne temasektion vil løbende blive opdateret.
On Friday 24 February a feature page dedicated to ACTA will be created, which will then be regularly updated.
Live-transmissioner fra udvalgsmøderne vil blive annonceret på Parlamentets websted, og der vil blive linket til nye relevante dokumenter.
Live broadcast of meetings will be announced and there will be links to documents that have been released.
Vi vil også dække drøftelserne over Facebook og Twitter.
There will also be regular announcements through the Parliament's Facebook page and Twitter accounts (in 22 different languages).
ACTA- aftalen Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 10. marts 2010 Europa-Parlamentets beslutning af 24. november 2010 Ekstern undersøgelse om ACTA for Europa-Parlamentet (EN)
Vital Moreira In the wake of last week's signature of the ACTA Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement by 22 EU countries and EU representatives, public interest has turned to the role of the European Parliament.
Europa-Parlamentet vil modtage 2,4 mio. underskrifter mod ACTA-aftalen
Parliament has received 2.4 million petition signatures against ACTA
Kritikere frygter, at aftalen vil favorisere de store virksomheders interesser ©BELGA/AFP/J.Skarzynski Parlamentet vil i morgen modtage et andragende mod ACTA- aftalen, der omhandler bekæmpelse af varemærkeforfalskning, underskrevet af mere end 2,4 millioner internetbrugere.
Picture of protest against ACTA The EP received on Tuesday a petition signed by more than 2.4 million internet users against the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).
De frygter, at aftalen vil udgøre en trussel mod et frit og åbent internet.
They fear that the agreement will pose a threat to a free and open internet.
Medlemmerne af Parlamentets udvalg for andragender vil se nærmere på andragendet, før de beslutter sig for, hvad der skal ske.
The EP's petitions committee will look at the petition before deciding what action to take.
Det er internetorganisationen Avaaz, der står bag andragendet.
The petition has been organised by Avaaz, an organisation which uses internet to campaign on various issues.
Når andragendet er modtaget, vil udvalget beslutte, hvorvidt det er gyldigt eller ej.
Once the petition has been received, the committee will decide whether it is admissible or not.
Dette tager normalt én til to måneder.
This normally takes one to two months.
I særlige tilfælde kan en "hasteprocedure" tages i anvendelse for at fremskynde processen.
In special cases an "urgency procedure" can be used to speed up this process.
Et andragende kan afvises, hvis det ikke falder ind under EU´s ansvarsområde.
A petition could be declared inadmissible if it does not fall with the EU's area of activity.
I sådanne tilfælde vil der ikke træffes yderligere foranstaltninger.
In this case, no further action will be taken.
Hvis et andragende godtages, vil udvalget derefter beslutte, hvilken type foranstaltninger, der skal iværksættes.
If a petition is declared admissible, the committee will then decide what type of action should be taken.
Formanden for udvalget for andragender Erminia Mazzoni (EPP, Italien) sagde: "Ratifikationsproceduren for ACTA er først lige begyndt i Europa-Parlamentet.
Italian Christian-Democrat Erminia Mazzoni, chair of the petitions committee, said: "The ratification procedure of ACTA in the European Parliament has only just started.
Aftalen skal undersøges nøje, under hensyntagen til alle bekymringer, gennem en begrundet vurdering af fakta.
It will need to be examined carefully, taking into consideration all concerns, through a reasoned assessment of the facts and trying to combine the freedom of the Internet on the one hand and the fight against counterfeiting on the other.
Aftalen skal forsøge at kombinere frihed på internettet på den ene side og kampen mod forfalskning på den anden".
The follow-up of the petition will be decided in the coming weeks by the members of the committee on petitions."
Udvalget for Andragender forsøger at bekæmpe krænkelser af borgernes rettigheder gennem et struktureret samarbejde med lokale, regionale og nationale myndigheder om anvendelsen af ​​EU-lovgivningen.
The petitions committee works to resolve infringements of citizens' rights through cooperation with local, regional and national authorities on the application of EU law on a range of issues.
Det er et undersøgelsesudvalg, og det har ingen juridisk magt, men forsøger at finde klagemuligheder for borgere, hvis fordringer er underbygget.
It is an investigative committee and has no legal power, but tries to find non-judicial remedies for citizens whose claims are substantiated.
Udvalget kan arrangere fact-finding besøg og aflægge rapport til plenum.
It can organise fact-finding visits and report to plenary.
ACTA-aftalen sigter mod at skabe en mere effektiv håndhævelse af intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder på internationalt plan.
ACTA is aimed at more effectively enforcing intellectual property rights on an international level.
Det har vist sig kontroversielt, fordi kritikere frygter, at aftalen vil favorisere de store virksomheders interesser på bekostning af borgernes rettigheder.
It has proved controversial because critics worry the agreement would favour the interests of large companies at the expense of citizens' rights and see its possible application in the online sphere as a threat to people's privacy and human rights.
Herudover ser de aftalens mulige anvendelse i onlinesfæren som en krænkelse af folks privatliv.
It cannot enter into force in the EU unless the Parliament gives its consent and all member states ratify it.
Aftalen kan ikke træde i kraft i EU, medmindre Europa-Parlamentet giver sit samtykke og alle medlemslande ratificerer.
Text of the petition: "To all Members of the EU Parliament: As concerned global citizens, we call on you to stand for a free and open Internet and reject the ratification of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), which would destroy it.
Program (EN) Udvalget for Andragender Erminia Mazzoni
The Internet is a crucial tool for people around the world to exchange ideas and promote democracy.
ACTA-aftalen: "Alt, hvad der var tilladt er tilladt, alt hvad der var forbudt forbliver forbudt" - Vital Moreira
We urge you to show true global leadership and protect our rights."
I januar 2012 underskrev 22 EU-lande og repræsentanter for EU ACTA-aftalen.
Video of the hand-over Photos of the hand-over Petitions committee Erminia Mazzoni
Hvad er Europa-Parlamentets rolle i processen?
ACTA: MEPs want clarity before taking a decision