natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Opmærksomheden skal henledes på, at der bag betænkningens detaljerede opregning af episoder, vidneudsagn og ansvar først og fremmest gemmer sig historier om mennesker, der i mange tilfælde (og først efter års tilbageholdelse) bliver fundet fuldstændig uskyldige i de anklager, der har været rejst mod dem.
It should be emphasised that, behind the rigorous exposition of incidents, facts and responsibilities in the report lie the stories of individual human beings, many of whom have – following years of detention – been recognised as being totally innocent of the charges brought against them.
Det drejer sig om mennesker, der er blevet frataget deres mest elementære rettigheder, og som ofte er blevet udsat for en degraderende og ydmygende behandling.
These are men deprived of their most basic rights and in many cases forced to undergo degrading and humiliating treatment.
Man bør huske, at det kun har været muligt for det midlertidige udvalg at beskæftige sig med disse ofre for ekstraordinære overførsler - meget ofte europæiske statsborgere eller personer med fast bopæl i Europa - fordi deres sag allerede var blevet offentligt kendt.
It should be remembered that we were only able to address the plight of these victims of extraordinary renditions because their cases had become public knowledge.
Vi frygter, at mange andre har lidt samme skæbne, uden at historien (eller det midlertidige udvalg) har kunnet tage sig af dem.
It is to be feared that many others may have suffered the same fate but escaped the notice of history (and this committee).
Endelig vedlægger ordføreren som et supplement til denne begrundelse og de politiske konklusioner i de to betænkninger følgende dokumenter:
Finally, as further reading to this explanatory statement and the political conclusions set out in the two reports, the rapporteur has attached the following documents:
En sammenfattende oversigt over alle det midlertidige udvalgs aktiviteter (bilag 1).
An overview of all the activities of the TDIP temporary committee (Annex 1).
En liste over alle de personer, der har aflagt vidneudsagn over for udvalget eller i forbindelse med en officiel udvalgsdelegations besøg i et andet land (bilag 2).
A list of all the persons who gave evidence before the committee or during an official delegation mission (Annex 2).
Et dokument indeholdende en detaljeret oversigt over det samarbejde, som hvert enkelt europæisk land har tilbudt det midlertidige udvalg (bilag 3).
A document providing details on cooperation afforded to our committee by individual European countries (Annex 3).
En liste over alle de personer, der har afslået indbydelsen til at give møde for det midlertidige udvalg (bilag 4).
A list of all those who declined an invitation to meet the committee (Annex 4).
Afsluttende skal ordføreren henlede opmærksomheden på, at denne endelige betænkning ligesom alle de dokumenter og analyser, han har forelagt, er resultatet af en samlet kollektiv indsats, hvortil mange andre parlamentsmedlemmer (fra alle politiske grupper) har givet deres støtte.
To wind up, the rapporteur considers it his duty to point out that his final report and all the documents and analyses he has produced are the fruit of collective effort involving a large number of Members from all political groups, in what were difficult circumstances.
I denne forbindelse skal særlig nævnes tjenestemændene i det midlertidige udvalgs sekretariat og ordførerens nærmeste medarbejdere samt alle de øvrige tjenestemænd i Europa-Parlamentets sekretariat og de andre politiske grupper, som også har taget del i det seneste års store arbejde.
A special mention should go to the members of the committee secretariat and the staff working directly for the rapporteur, as well as to all other EP secretariat and political group staff involved in the arduous work performed over the past year.
Vor tak går til hver og én af disse.
Our thanks go to each and every one of them.
Bilag 1 :
Annex 1 :
Examination of the draft interim report; Stephen H. OLESKEY , Counsel for six citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina imprisoned at Guantánamo Bay; Srdjan DIZDAREVIC , President of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina; Michele PICARD , former President of the Human Rights Chamber of Bosnia Herzegovina
Examination of the draft interim report; Stephen H. OLESKEY , Counsel for six citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay; Srdjan DIZDAREVIC , President of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina; Michele PICARD , former President of the Human Rights Chamber of Bosnia Herzegovina
John BRUTON , Head of the European Commission Delegation; Scott HORTON , Chair of the committee on International Law; Margaret L. SATTERTHWAITE , Assistant Professor of Clinical Law and Faculty Director; Barbara OLSHANSKY , Director and Counsel (Guantánamo Global Justice Initiative); Elisa MASSIMINO , Director of the Washington, D.C. Office (Human Rights First); Angela COLAIUTA , Center for Victims of Torture, John BRADSHAW , Open Society Policy Center, Smita BARUAH , Physicians for Human Rights, Jumana MUSA , Advocacy Director for Domestic Human Rights and International Justice; Jonathan SIFTON , Counterterrorism Researcher, Jennifer DASKAL , US Advocacy Director; Representative Robert WEXLER (D-Florida); Dan FRIED , Assistant Secretary of State, John BELLINGER , Department of State's Legal Adviser; Steven M. WATT , Staff Attorney Ann BEESON , Associate Legal Director, Chris ANDERS , Legislative Counsel; Senator Arlen SPECTER (R) Pennsylvania; Senator Richard DURBIN (D) Illinois; Congressman Ed MARKEY (D) Massachusetts; James WOOLSEY (Former CIA Director 1993-1995); David RIVKIN , Olivier GUITTA and Sally McNAMARA from the American Legislative Exchange Council; Morton H. HALPERIN , Lawrence J. KORB , Peter RUNDLET and Ken GUDE from the Center for American Progress; Eva NOWOTNY , Austrian Ambassador to the USA representing the EU Council's Presidency
John BRUTON , Head of the European Commission Delegation; Scott HORTON , Chair of the committee on International Law; Margaret L. SATTERTHWAITE , Assistant Professor of Clinical Law and Faculty Director; Barbara OLSHANSKY , Director and Counsel (Guantanamo Global Justice Initiative); Elisa MASSIMINO , Director of the Washington, D.C. Office (Human Rights First); Angela COLAIUTA , Center for Victims of Torture, John BRADSHAW , Open Society Policy Center, Smita BARUAH , Physicians for Human Rights, Jumana MUSA , Advocacy Director for Domestic Human Rights and International Justice; Jonathan SIFTON , Counterterrorism Researcher, Jennifer DASKAL , US Advocacy Director; Representative Robert WEXLER (D-Florida); Dan FRIED , Assistant Secretary of State, John BELLINGER , Department of State's Legal Adviser; Steven M. WATT , Staff Attorney Ann BEESON , Associate Legal Director, Chris ANDERS , Legislative Counsel; Senator Arlen SPECTER (R) Pennsylvania; Senator Richard DURBIN (D) Illinois; Congressman Ed MARKEY (D) Massachusetts; James WOOLSEY (Former CIA Director 1993-1995); David RIVKIN , Olivier GUITTA and Sally McNAMARA from the American Legislative Exchange Council; Morton H. HALPERIN , Lawrence J. KORB , Peter RUNDLET and Ken GUDE from the Center for American Progress; Eva NOWOTNY , Austrian Ambassador to the USA representing the EU Council's Presidency
Bilag 2:
Annex 2:
OLESKEY H. Stephen
OLESKEY H. Stephen
Counsel for Six citizens of Bosnia and Herzegoina imprisoned at Guantánamo Bay
Counsel for Six citizens of Bosnia and Herzegoina imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay
Director and Counsel of the Guantánamo Global Justice Initiative
Director and Counsel of the Guantanamo Global Justice Initiative
Bilag 3:
Annex 3:
Bilag 4:
Annex 4:
Luis A. FONSECA DE ALMEIDA , President of National Institute for Civil Aviation (INAC )
Luis A. FONSECA DE ALMEIDA , President of National Institute for Civil Aviation (INAC )
John D. ROCKEFELLER, Senator
John D. ROCKEFELLER, Senator
Porter J. GOSS, CIA Director
Porter J. GOSS, CIA Director
CIA's påståede brug af europæiske lande ved transport og ulovlig tilbageholdelse af fanger
The alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners
om Forligsudvalgets fælles udkast til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv om opbygning af en infrastruktur for geografisk information i Det Europæiske Fællesskab (Inspire)
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE)
– der henviser til Forligsudvalgets fælles udkast (PE-CONS 3685/2006 – C6‑0445/2006 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3685/2006 – C6‑0445/2006 ),
Endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT: ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
Vedtagne tekster af 2.5.2006, P6_TA(2006)0252 . til Rådets fælles holdning
Texts Adopted of 2.5.2006, P6_TA(2006)0252 . on the Council common position
– der henviser til Kommissionens udtalelse om Parlamentets ændringer til den fælles holdning ( KOM(2006)0484 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2006)0484 )
– der henviser til betænkning fra sin delegation til Forligsudvalget ( A6‑0021/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0021/2007 ),
Formålet med dette forslag til direktiv, der bygger på EF-traktatens artikel 175, stk. 1, og som blev vedtaget af Kommissionen i juli 2004, er at skabe en retlig ramme for oprettelsen og driften af en infrastruktur for geografisk information i Europa med henblik på at udforme, gennemføre, overvåge og evaluere Fællesskabets politikker på alle niveauer og informere offentligheden.
The aim of the proposed Directive, based on Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty and adopted by the Commission in July 2004, is to create a legal framework for the establishment and operation of an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe, for the purpose of formulating, implementing, monitoring and evaluating Community policies at all levels and providing public information.
Et centralt mål med Inspire er at tilvejebringe flere og bedre geodata til brug for Fællesskabets udformning af politikker og for gennemførelsen af dem på alle niveauer i medlemsstaterne.
A key objective of INSPIRE is to make more and better spatial data available for Community policy-making and implementation of Community policies in the Member States at all levels.
Inspire fokuserer på miljøpolitik, men kan anvendes af og fremover udvides til at omfatte andre sektorer, f.eks. landbrug, transport og energi.
INSPIRE focuses on environmental policy but is open for use by and future extension to other sectors such as agriculture, transport and energy.
Parlamentet vedtog en beslutning ved førstebehandlingen den 7. juni 2005: Rådet vedtog sin fælles holdning den 23. januar 2006.
The Parliament adopted its first reading on 7 June 2005: Council adopted its common position on 23 January 2006.
Ved andenbehandlingen den 13. juni 2006 vedtog Parlamentet 36 ændringsforslag til Rådets fælles holdning.
At second reading, on 13 June 2006, the Parliament adopted 36 amendments to the Council's common position.
De emner, som Parlamentet og Rådet drøftede, var: intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder og omkostninger, undtagelser fra pligten til at stille oplysninger til rådighed, datatjenesternes form og adgangen til disse, metadata og datadefinitioner, direktivets anvendelsesområde samt gennemførelsesfrister.
The issues at stake between Parliament and Council concerned: intellectual property rights and costs; exemptions from obligations to provide data; type of data provision services and access to these; meta-data and data definition; scope of the Directive; deadlines for its implementation.
Rådet oplyste derefter uformelt, at det ikke kunne acceptere alle Parlamentets ændringsforslag, og at det derfor var nødvendigt at igangsætte en forligsprocedure.
The Council subsequently indicated informally that it would be unable to accept all of the Parliament's amendments and that consequently a conciliation procedure would be necessary.
Parlamentets delegation til Forligsudvalget holdt sit konstituerende møde i Strasbourg den 4. juli.
The constituent meeting of Parliament's delegation to the Conciliation Committee was held in Strasbourg on 4 July.
Medlemmerne pålagde formanden, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, formanden for det ansvarlige udvalg, Karl-Heinz Florenz, ordføreren, Frieda Brepoels og María Sornosa Martínez til at indlede uformelle forhandlinger med Rådet.
Its members instructed the Chair, Mr. Vidal-Quadras, the Chair of the committee responsible, Mr. Florenz, the rapporteur, Mrs. Brepoels, and Mrs. Sornosa Martínez, to begin informal negotiations with the Council.
Der blev afholdt tre trilogmøder (den 26. september, den 9. oktober og den 8. november), og forhandlingsgruppen aflagde rapport til Parlamentets delegation efter hvert møde (den 27. september, den 24. oktober og den 14. november).
Three trialogues were held (on 26 September, 9 October and 8 November), with the negotiating team reporting back after each meeting to the EP delegation (on 27 September, 24 October and 14 November).
Der blev gjort rimelige fremskridt, hvad angår de ændringsforslag, der vedrørte de offentlige rumtjenester, gennemførelsesprincipper og tekniske problemer.
Reasonable progress was made on those groups of amendments which concerned public spatial services, principles of implementation, and technical issues.
De to punkter, hvor parterne var mest uenige – afgiftsniveauer for oplysninger og intellektuelle ejendomsrettigheder – er der stadig uenighed omkring.
However, two key points of difference - levels of charges for data and intellectual property rights - remained unresolved.
Forligsudvalget mødtes den 21. november 2006 om aftenen.
The Conciliation Committee met in the evening of 21 November 2006.
Rådet var repræsenteret ved Enestam, den finske miljøminister, og Kommissionen var repræsenteret ved kommissær Dimas.
The Council was represented by Mr. Enestam, Finnish Minister of the Environment, and the Commission by Commissioner Dimas.
Kort efter midnat nåede udvalget frem til en endelig aftale, efter at Parlamentets delegation enstemmigt havde vedtaget den foreslåede kompromispakke.
Shortly before midnight, the Committee was able to reach a final agreement after the delegation of the European Parliament had accepted unanimously the proposed compromise package.
De to hovedpunkter i den indgåede aftale kan opsummeres således:
The two key points of the agreement reached can be summarised as follows:
Afgiftsniveauer : Efter vedholdende krav fra Parlamentet blev det vedtaget, at medlemsstaterne generelt gratis skal stille tjenesterne til at finde og vise geodatasæt til rådighed.
Levels of charges : At Parliament's insistence, Member States will in general have to make available free of charge the services for discovering and viewing spatial data sets.
Nogle medlemsstater var bekymrede for, om dette kunne true den finansielle levedygtighed for de dele af deres offentlige tjenester, der indsamler geografiske data, og det blev vedtaget, at offentlige myndigheder på klart definerede betingelser kan opkræve gebyrer.
Some Member States were worried that this might threaten the financial viability of those parts of their public services which collect geographical data, and it was agreed that under clearly-defined conditions, public authorities will be allowed to levy charges.
Denne undtagelse vil dog ikke gælde for oplysninger, som de offentlige myndigheder har pligt til at stille til rådighed for at opfylde deres forpligtelser i henhold til fællesskabsretten.
However, this exemption will not apply to data that the public authorities are obliged to provide in order to fulfil their obligations under Community law.
Dette direktiv er en vigtig del af miljølovgivningen.
This Directive is an important piece of environmental legislation.
Den aftale, der blev indgået i løbet af forligsproceduren, omhandler de centrale emner, der var omfattet af ændringsforslagene ved andenbehandlingen.
The agreement reached in the course of the conciliation procedure addresses the key issues covered by the second-reading amendments.
Den er også meget mere tilfredsstillende end en aftale, der kunne være blevet indgået på et tidligere tidspunkt i lovgivningsproceduren.
It is also much more satisfactory than any agreement which could have been concluded at an earlier stage of the legislative procedure.
Infrastruktur for geografisk information i Det Europæiske Fællesskab (Inspire)
Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE)
Korresponderende udvalg Formand:
Committee responsible Chair(wo)man:
Forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv om opbygning af en infrastruktur for geografisk information i Fællesskabet (INSPIRE) – KOM(2004)0516 – C6-0099/2004
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the Community (INSPIRE) – COM(2004)0516 – C6-0099/2004
Dato for EP's andenbehandling - P-nr.
Date of Parliament’s second reading – P number
Kommissionens udtalelse (art. 251, stk. 2, 3. afsn., litra c)
Commission opinion (Article 251(2), subpara 3, point (c))
Til stede - stedfortrædere, jf. art. 178, stk. 2,
Substitute(s) under Rule 178(2) present
Frist for rådets andenbehandling
Deadline for second reading by Council
Frist for indkaldelse af udvalget Initiativtager – dato
Deadline for convening the Committee Requesting institution – date
Frist for udvalgets arbejde Initiativtager – dato
Deadline for work in the Committee Requesting institution – date
17.1.2007 EP – 11.12.2006
17.1.2007 Parliament – 11.12.2006
om Revisionsrettens særberetning nr. 6/2005 om transeuropæiske transportnetværk (TEN-T)
on the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 6/2005 on the Trans-European Network for Transport (TEN-T)
UDTALELSE FRA TRANSPORT- OG TURISMEUDVALGET..............................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ................................10
− der henviser til Revisionsrettens særberetning nr. 6/2005 om transeuropæiske transportnetværk (TEN-T) med Kommissionens svar
- having regard to the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 6/2005 on the Trans-European Network for Transport (TEN-T), together with the Commission's replies
− der henviser til EF-traktatens artikel 248, stk. 4, andet afsnit, artikel 276, stk. 3, og artikel 280, stk. 5,
- having regard to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, Article 276(3) and Article 280(5) of the EC Treaty,
− der henviser til Budgetkontroludvalgets arbejdsdokument om emnet
- having regard to the Committee on Budgetary Control working document on the issue
− der henviser til sin beslutning af 26. oktober 2006 om forslaget til Den Europæiske Unions almindelige budget for regnskabsåret 2007
- having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2006 on the draft general budget of the EU for the financial year 2007
Vedtagne tekster , P6_TA(2006)0451 ). ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0451 . ,
− der henviser til forretningsordenens artikel 45,
- having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,
− der henviser til betænkning fra Budgetkontroludvalget og udtalelse fra Transport- og Turismeudvalget ( A6‑0022/2007 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0022/2007 ),
3. noterer sig Kommissionens korrigerende aktioner, der blandt andet omfatter en ændring af Rådets forordninger i 2004 for at tage hensyn til nogle af Rådets foreløbige resultater;
Notes the corrective actions taken by the Commission by, inter alia , modifying the governing Council regulations in 2004, with some of the Court's early findings being taken into consideration;
http://ec.europa.eu/ten/transport/coordinators/index_en.htm og er enig med Kommissionen i, at manglende fuldførelse af det transeuropæiske transportnet som helhed vil medføre en forringelse af den økonomiske konkurrenceevne;
http://ec.europa.eu/ten/transport/coordinators/index_en.htm. , and agrees with the Commission's finding that failure to complete the trans-European transport network as a whole would lead to a loss of economic competitiveness;
16. mener, at grænseoverskridende dele af prioriterede projekter med høj merværdi for Fællesskabet og visse store flaskehalse bør gives fortrinsret under den nuværende finansielle ramme med henblik på i væsentlig grad at bidrage til fuldførelsen af transeuropæiske, indbyrdes forbundne og interoperable transportnet; glæder sig i denne forbindelse over samarbejdsaftalen med Den Europæiske Investeringsbank (EIB);
Is of the opinion that in the current financial environment preference should be given to cross-border sections of priority projects with high Community added-value and to certain major ‘bottlenecks’ in order to contribute significantly to the completion of a trans-European, interconnected and interoperable transport network; welcomes in this context the cooperation agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB);
20. opfordrer Kommissionen til at skabe en klar og gennemskuelig fordeling af det institutionelle ansvar og fastsætte en ramme for samordningen af aktiviteter mellem GD REGIO og GD TRAN med henblik på at undgå dobbeltfinansiering af projekter; mener, at der bør indgås klare aftaler mellem medlemsstaterne og Kommissionen om adskillelsen af støtte fra forskellige EU-kilder;
Urges the Commission to establish a clear and transparent division of institutional responsibilities and to define a framework for the coordination of activities between DG REGIO and DG TREN with a view to avoiding double-financing of the same projects; considers it good practice to have clear agreements in place between the Member States and the Commission on the separation of funding from different EU sources;
22. noterer sig, at betalinger fra Kommissionen har været urimelig lang tid om at nå den endelige betalingsmodtager; understreger derfor, at en direkte betalingsstrøm fra Kommissionen til betalingsmodtageren vil være en bedre løsning;
Notes that payments from the Commission have taken excessive time to reach the final beneficiary; calls therefore for money to be paid out swiftly and efficiently; in this context direct payment flow from the Commission to the beneficiary could be a better solution;
24. bemærker, at Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 58/2003 af 19. december 2002 om vedtægterne for de forvaltningsorganer, der skal administrere opgaver i forbindelse med EF-programmer
Points out that Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes
29. opfordrer Den Europæiske Revisionsret til rettidigt inden 2009 at kontrollere forvaltningsorganernes effektivitet og aflægge rapport for Budgetkontroludvalget;
Calls on the European Court of Auditors to verify, at the appropriate time before 2009, the effectiveness of executive agencies and report back to the Committee on Budgetary Control;
Det transeuropæiske transportnet (TEN-T) 2000-2006
The Trans-European Network for Transport (TEN-T) 2000 - 2006
Fællesskabet bidrager til etableringen af transeuropæiske transportnet på transportområdet (TEN-T) for at fremme samhørighed, sikre, at de nationale net kan forbindes og fungere indbyrdes, og for at garantere adgangen til disse net i hele EU.
The Community contributes to the establishment of trans-European networks in the area of transport (TEN-T) to promote cohesion, interconnection and interoperability of national networks as well as access to such networks across the European Union.
For at opnå dette finansierer Fællesskabet infrastrukturprojekter og undersøgelser vedrørende veje, jernbaner, indre vandveje, lufthavne, havne, satellitnavigations- og trafikstyringsprojekter.
To achieve this, the Community finances infrastructure projects and studies for roads, railways, inland waterways, airports, ports, satellite navigation and traffic management systems.
De budgetmæssige udgifter til TEN-T er steget fra EUR 182 mio. i 1993 til EUR 661 mio. i 2005.
Budgetary expenditure on TEN-T increased from € 182 million in 1993 to € 661 million in 2005.