natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It would be detrimental to the operation of the Directive if the largest airport in a Member State was not included in it scope.
It would be detrimental to the operation of the Directive if the largest airport in a Member State was not included in it scope.
(5) Af hensyn til fordelingen af trafikken bør medlemsstaterne kunne tillade, at et lufthavnsdriftsorgan for lufthavne, der trafikmæssigt dækker samme by eller bygruppe, anvender samme lufthavnsafgiftsniveau .
(5) For reasons of traffic distribution Member States should be able to allow an airport managing body for airports serving the same city or conurbation to apply the same level of airport charges .
Økonomiske overførsler mellem disse lufthavne bør være i overensstemmelse med den relevante fællesskabslovgivning.
Economic transfers between these airports should comply with relevant Community law.
(5) Af hensyn til fordelingen af trafikken bør medlemsstaterne kunne tillade, at et lufthavnsdriftsorgan for lufthavne, der trafikmæssigt dækker samme by eller bygruppe, anvender et fælles og gennemsigtigt afgiftssystem .
(5) For reasons of traffic distribution Member States should be able to allow an airport managing body for airports serving the same city or conurbation to apply a common and transparent charging system .
The same level of charges need not be applied but the charging system must be common and transparent.
The same level of charges need not be applied but the charging system must be common and transparent.
The same level of charges would not be appropriate as it would not be cost related or related to the level of service or facilities provided.
The same level of charges would not be appropriate as it would not be cost related or related to the level of service or facilities provided.
(10) Lufthavnsafgifter bør ikke medføre forskelsbehandling.
(10) Airport charges should be non‑discriminatory.
Der bør iværksættes en obligatorisk procedure for regelmæssigt samråd mellem lufthavnsdriftsorganet og lufthavnsbrugerne, og begge parter bør have mulighed for at klage til en uafhængig tilsynsinstans , hvis en afgørelse om lufthavnsafgifter eller ændring af afgiftssystemet anfægtes af lufthavnsbrugerne.
A compulsory procedure for regular consultation between airport managing bodies and airport users should be put in place with the possibility for either party to have recourse to an independent supervisory body whenever a decision on airport charges or the modification of the charging system is contested by airport users.
Der bør iværksættes en obligatorisk procedure for regelmæssigt samråd mellem lufthavnsdriftsorganet og lufthavnsbrugerne, og begge parter bør have mulighed for at klage til en uafhængig tilsynsmyndighed , hvis en afgørelse om lufthavnsafgifter eller ændring af afgiftssystemet anfægtes af lufthavnsbrugerne.
A compulsory procedure for regular consultation between airport managing bodies and airport users should be put in place with the possibility for either party to have recourse to an independent supervisory authority whenever a decision on airport charges or the modification of the charging system is contested by airport users.
"Authority" more accurately reflects the tasks and responsibilities involved.
"Authority" more accurately reflects the tasks and responsibilities involved.
(11) For at sikre upartiske afgørelser og en korrekt og effektiv anvendelse af dette direktiv bør der oprettes en uafhængig tilsynsinstans i hver medlemsstat.
(11) In order to ensure impartial decisions and the proper and effective application of this Directive, an independent supervisory body should be established in every Member State.
Instansen bør råde over de nødvendige personale- og ekspertressourcer samt økonomiske midler til at udføre sine opgaver.
The body should be in possession of all the necessary resources in terms of staffing, expertise, and financial means for the performance of its tasks.
(11) For at sikre upartiske afgørelser og en korrekt og effektiv anvendelse af dette direktiv bør der oprettes en uafhængig tilsynsmyndighed i hver medlemsstat.
(11) In order to ensure impartial decisions and the proper and effective application of this Directive, an independent supervisory authority should be established in every Member State.
(14a) I de forskellige medlemsstater er der forskellige systemer til forfinansiering af lufthavnsinvesteringer.
(14a) Different systems exist in different Member States concerning the pre-financing of airport investments.
I medlemsstater, hvor forfinansiering forekommer, bør medlemsstaterne eller lufthavnene henholde sig til ICAO's politikker og/eller indføre deres egne beskyttelsesmekanismer.
In Member States where pre-financing occurs, Member States or airports should refer to ICAO policies and/or establish their own safeguards.
There must be clear safeguards on place where pre-financing occurs.
There must be clear safeguards on place where pre-financing occurs.
Medlemsstaterne kan tillade, at lufthavnsdriftsorganet for et lufthavnsnet indfører et fælles og gennemsigtigt lufthavnsafgiftssystem, der skal dække lufthavnsnettet.
Member States may allow the airport managing body of an airport network to introduce a common and transparent airport charging system to cover the airport network.
Medlemsstaterne kan tillade, at lufthavnsdriftsorganet for lufthavne, der trafikmæssigt dækker samme by eller bygruppe, anvender samme lufthavnsafgiftsniveau for alle de berørte lufthavne, forudsat at hver enkelt lufthavn fuldt ud opfylder kravene om åbenhed i artikel 6.
Member States may allow an airport managing body for airports serving the same city or conurbation, to apply the same level of airport charges to all the airports concerned, provided that each airport fully complies with the requirements on transparency set out in Article 6.
Fælles afgiftssystemer
Common charging systems
Efter at have meddelt Kommissionen det og under overholdelse af fællesskabsretten kan medlemsstaterne tillade, at et lufthavnsdriftsorgan anvender et fælles og gennemsigtigt afgiftssystem for lufthavne, der trafikmæssigt dækker samme by eller bygruppe, forudsat at hver enkelt lufthavn fuldt ud opfylder kravene om åbenhed i artikel 6.
After having informed the Commission and in accordance with Community law, Member States may allow an airport managing body to apply a common and transparent charging system at airports serving the same city or conurbation, provided that each airport fully complies with the requirements on transparency set out in Article 6.
Medlemsstaterne sikrer, at ændringer i en lufthavns afgiftssystem eller i afgiftsniveauet så vidt muligt sker efter aftale mellem lufthavnsdriftsorganet og lufthavnsbrugerne.
Member States shall ensure that, wherever possible, changes to the system or the level of airport charges are made in agreement between the airport managing body and the airport users.
Til dette formål forelægger lufthavnsdriftsorganet ethvert forslag om ændring af lufthavnens afgiftssystem eller afgiftsniveauet for lufthavnsbrugerne, senest fire måneder før ændringen skal træde i kraft, sammen med en begrundelse for de påtænkte ændringer, medmindre der foreligger særlige omstændigheder, der skal begrundes over for lufthavnsbrugerne ; i dette tilfælde må perioden ikke være mindre end to måneder .
To that end, the airport managing body shall submit any proposal to modify the system or the level of airport charges to the airport users no later than four months before they enter into force, together with the reasons for the proposed changes, unless there are exceptional circumstances which need to be justified to airport users , in which case, this period shall not be less than two months .
Lufthavnsdriftsorganet holder samråd om de påtænkte ændringer med lufthavnsbrugerne og tager hensyn til disses synspunkter, før der træffes afgørelse om ændringerne.
The airport managing body shall hold consultations on the proposed changes with the airport users and take their views into account before a decision is taken.
Lufthavnsdriftsorganet skal offentliggøre sin afgørelse eller anbefaling inden for en rimelig frist, før den træder i kraft.
The airport managing body shall publish its decision or recommendation within reasonable time before it enters into force.
Til dette formål forelægger lufthavnsdriftsorganet ethvert forslag om ændring af lufthavnens afgiftssystem eller afgiftsniveauet for lufthavnsbrugerne, senest fire måneder før ændringen skal træde i kraft, sammen med en begrundelse for de påtænkte ændringer, medmindre der foreligger særlige omstændigheder, der skal begrundes over for lufthavnsbrugerne.
To that end, the airport managing body shall submit any proposal to modify the system or the level of airport charges to the airport users no later than four months before they enter into force, together with the reasons for the proposed changes, unless there are exceptional circumstances which need to be justified to airport users.
Lufthavnsdriftsorganet skal normalt offentliggøre sin afgørelse eller anbefaling senest to måneder før den træder i kraft.
The airport managing body shall normally publish its decision or recommendation no later than two months before its entry into force.
There is a need for flexibility in the time period required between submission of proposed charges and their coming into effect where exceptional circumstances arise.
There is a need for flexibility in the time period required between submission of proposed charges and their coming into effect where exceptional circumstances arise.
However, decisions should normally be published two months before they enter into force.
However, decisions should normally be published two months before they enter into force.
Medlemsstaterne sikrer, at begge parter i tilfælde af uenighed om en afgørelse om lufthavnsafgifter, der er truffet af lufthavnsdriftsorganet, kan klage til den uafhængige tilsynsinstans , jf. artikel 10, som derpå undersøger begrundelsen for ændringen af lufthavnsafgiftssystemet eller afgiftsniveauet.
Member States shall ensure that in the event of a disagreement over a decision on airport charges taken by the airport managing body, either party may seek the intervention of the independent supervisory body referred to in Article 10 which shall examine the justifications for the modification of the system or the level of airport charges.
Medlemsstaterne sikrer, at begge parter i tilfælde af uenighed om en afgørelse om lufthavnsafgifter, der er truffet af lufthavnsdriftsorganet, kan klage til den uafhængige tilsynsmyndighed , jf. artikel 10, som derpå undersøger begrundelsen for ændringen af lufthavnsafgiftssystemet eller afgiftsniveauet.
Member States shall ensure that in the event of a disagreement over a decision on airport charges taken by the airport managing body, either party may seek the intervention of the independent supervisory authority referred to in Article 10 which shall examine the justifications for the modification of the system or the level of airport charges.
Beslutter lufthavnsdriftsorganet at ændre lufthavnsafgiftssystemet eller -niveauet, og indbringes denne afgørelse for den uafhængige tilsynsinstans , træder ændringen ikke i kraft, før denne instans har undersøgt sagen.
A modification of the system or the level of airport charges decided upon by the airport managing body shall, if brought before the independent supervisory body, not take effect until that body has examined the matter.
Den uafhængige tilsynsinstans kan træffe en foreløbig afgørelse om ikrafttrædelsen af lufthavnsafgiftsændringen.
The independent supervisory body may take an interim decision on the entry into force of the modification of airport charges.
Beslutter lufthavnsdriftsorganet at ændre lufthavnsafgiftssystemet eller -niveauet, og indbringes denne afgørelse for den uafhængige tilsynsmyndighed , træder ændringen ikke i kraft, før denne myn ­ dig ­ hed har undersøgt sagen.
A modification of the system or the level of airport charges decided upon by the airport managing body shall, if brought before the independent supervisory authority , not take effect until that body has examined the matter.
Den uafhængige tilsynsinstans træffer senest fire uger efter, at en sag er indbragt for den, en foreløbig afgørelse om ikrafttrædel­sen af lufthavnsafgiftsændringen , medmindre den endelige afgørelse kan træffes inden for samme tidsfrist .
The independent supervisory authority shall, within four weeks of the matter being brought before it, take an interim decision on the entry into force of the modification of airport charges , unless the final decision can be taken within the same deadline .
There should be a reasonable time limit for interim decisions.
There should be a reasonable time limit for interim decisions.
En medlemsstat kan beslutte ikke at anvende stk. 3 og 4 i forbindelse med ændringer af lufthavnsafgiftssystemet eller -niveauet eller i de lufthavne, for hvilke den har indført en procedure, hvorefter der foretages økonomisk kontrol.
A Member State may decide not to apply paragraphs 3 and 4 in relation to the changes to the system or the level of airport charges at those airports for which it has established a procedure, whereby there is economic oversight.
Disse økonomiske kontrolforanstaltninger kan være de samme som dem, der henvises til i artikel 1, stk. 5.
The economic oversight measures may be the same as those referred to in Article 1(5).
Hvis foranstaltningerne omfatter godkendelse af lufthavnsafgiftssystemet eller -niveauet, skal disse foranstaltninger godkendes af den instans, som er blevet udpeget eller oprettet som en uafhængig tilsynsinstans med henblik på dette direktiv.
Where these measures include approval of the system or the level of airport charges, they must be approved by the same body that has been nominated or established as an independent supervisory body for the purposes of this Directive.
En medlemsstat kan beslutte ikke at anvende stk. 3 og 4 i forbindelse med ændringer af lufthavnsafgifternes niveau eller struktur i de lufthavne, for hvilke :
A Member State may decide not to apply paragraphs 3 and 4 in relation to changes to the level of charges or the structure of the airport charges at those airports for which :
a) national lovgivning foreskriver en obligatorisk procedure, ifølge hvilken lufthavnsafgifter, eller det maksimale niveau for lufthavnsafgifter, fastsættes eller godkendes af den i artikel 10 nævnte myndighed; eller
(a) there is a mandatory procedure under national law whereby airport charges, or their maximum level, shall be determined or approved by the authority referred to in A rticle 10; or
b) national lovgivning foreskriver en obligatorisk procedure, ifølge hvilken den i artikel 10 nævnte myndighed regelmæssigt eller efter forespørgsel fra interesserede parter undersøger, om der hersker effektiv konkurrence mellem disse lufthavne.
(b) there is a mandatory procedure under national law whereby the authority referred to in A rticle 10 examines on a regular basis or in response to requests from interested parties whether such airports are subject to effective competition.
Hvis en sådan undersøgelse giver grundlag herfor, afgør medlemsstaten, at lufthavnsafgifterne, eller det maksimale niveau for lufthavnsafgifterne, skal fastlægges eller godkendes af den i artikel 10 nævnte myndighed.
Whenever warranted on the basis of such an examination, the Member State shall decide that the airport charges, or their maximum level, shall be determined or approved by the authority referred to in A rticle 10.
Denne afgørelse gælder så længe, det er nødvendigt, på grundlag af undersøgelsen foretaget af den samme myndighed.
This decision shall apply for as long as is necessary on the basis of the examination conducted by the same authority.
De procedurer, betingelser og kriterier, som medlemsstaten indfører med sigte på bestemmelserne i dette stykke, skal være relevante, objektive, ikke-forskelsbehandlende og gennemsigtige.
The procedures, conditions and criteria applied for the purpose of this paragraph by the Member State shall be relevant, objective, non-discriminatory and transparent.
This amendment ensures that either there is a national mandatory procedure for determining airport charges or a mandatory procedure for their regular review in those Member States who decide not to use the independent supervisory authority to arbitrate on the level of charges.
This amendment ensures that either there is a national mandatory procedure for determining airport charges or a mandatory procedure for their regular review in those Member States who decide not to use the independent supervisory authority to arbitrate on the level of charges.
Artikel 6 – stk. 1 - litra d a (ny)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
da) enhver finansiering fra offentlige myndigheder af faciliteter og tjenesteydelser, som lufthavnsafgifterne vedrører;
(da) any financing from public authorities of the facilities and services which airport charges relate to;
This is necessary to obtain full clarity on financing from public sources.
This is necessary to obtain full clarity on financing from public sources.
Artikel 6 – stk. 1 – litra f
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
f) den faktiske udnyttelse af lufthavnens infrastruktur og udstyr over en given periode
(f) the actual use of airport infrastructure and equipment over a given period.
f) den faktiske udnyttelse af lufthavnens infrastruktur og udstyr over en given periode; og
(f) the actual use of airport infrastructure and equipment over a given period ; and
For clarity.
For clarity.
Artikel 6 – stk. 1 – litra f a (nyt)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
fa) alle foreslåede større investeringers forventede resultat i form af deres indvirkning på lufthavnens kapacitet.
(fa) the predicted outcome of any major proposed investments in terms of their effects on airport capacity.
This is necessary for transparency and for stakeholders to make the appropriate decisions.
This is necessary for transparency and for stakeholders to make the appropriate decisions.
Artikel 9 – overskrift
Article 9 – title
Skræddersyede tjenesteydelser
Tailored services
Differentierede tjenesteydelser
Differentiation of services
More accurately reflects the purpose of this article.
More accurately reflects the purpose of this article.
Lufthavnsafgiftssystemet og/eller -niveauet kan differentieres på grundlag af kvaliteten og omfanget af sådanne ydelser samt omkostningerne ved dem eller enhver anden objektiv begrundelse.
The system or the level of airport charges may be differentiated according to the quality and scope of such services and their costs or any other objective justification.
Lufthavnsdriftsorganet kan frit fastsætte sådanne differentierede lufthavnsafgifter.
Airport managing bodies shall remain free to set any such differentiated airport charges.
Lufthavnsafgiftsniveauet kan differentieres på grundlag af kvaliteten og omfanget af sådanne ydelser samt omkostningerne ved dem eller enhver anden objektiv og gennemsigtig begrundelse.
The level of airport charges may be differentiated according to the quality and scope of such services and their costs or any other objective and transparent justification.
Med forbehold af artikel 3 om ikke-diskrimination af lufthavnsbrugere kan lufthavnsdriftsorganet frit fastsætte sådanne differentierede lufthavnsafgifter.
Without prejudice to A rticle 3 on non-discrimination among airport users, airport managing bodies shall remain free to set any such differentiated airport charges.
Necessary to emphasise transparency and non-discrimination.
Necessary to emphasise transparency and non-discrimination.
Artikel 9 – stk. 2 – afsnit 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Hvis der er flere lufthavnsbrugere, der ønsker adgang til de skræddersyede tjenesteydelser og/eller en særlig terminal eller terminaldel, end der er kapacitet til, gives der adgang på grundlag af relevante, objektive, gennemskuelige og ikke-diskriminerende kriterier.
In the event that more airport users wish to have access to the tailored services and/or a dedicated terminal or part of a terminal than is possible due to capacity constraints, access shall be determined on the basis of relevant, objective, transparent and non‑discriminatory criteria.
Disse kriterier kan fastsættes af lufthavnsdriftsorganet, og medlemsstaterne kan kræve, at disse kriterier godkendes af den uafhængige tilsynsinstans .
These criteria may be set by the airport managing body and Member States may require these criteria to be endorsed by the independent supervisory body .
Disse kriterier kan fastsættes af lufthavnsdriftsorganet, og medlemsstaterne kan kræve, at disse kriterier godkendes af den uafhængige tilsynsmyndighed .
These criteria may be set by the airport managing body and Member States may require these criteria to be endorsed by the independent supervisory authority .
Artikel 10 – overskrift
Article 10 – title
Uafhængig tilsynsinstans
Independent supervisory body
Uafhængig tilsynsmyndighed
Independent supervisory authority
Medlemsstaterne udpeger eller opretter en uafhængig instans som national uafhængig tilsynsinstans , der skal sikre, at de foranstaltninger, der træffes for at efterkomme dette direktiv, anvendes korrekt, samt mindst varetage de opgaver, det pålægges i henhold til artikel 5.
Member States shall nominate or establish an independent body as their national independent supervisory body in order to ensure the correct application of the measures taken to comply with this Directive and to assume, at least, the tasks assigned under Article 5.
Denne instans kan være den samme som den, medlemsstaten pålægger at varetage gennemførelsen af de yderligere reguleringsforanstaltninger, der henvises til i artikel 1, stk. 5, herunder godkendelse af afgiftssystemet og/eller lufthavnsafgiftsniveauet, forudsat at instansen opfylder kravene i nærværende artikels stk. 2.
Such body may be the same as the entity entrusted by a Member State with the application of the additional regulatory measures referred to in Article 1(5), including with the approval of the charging system and/or the level of airport charges, provided that it meets the requirements of paragraph 2 of this Article.
Medlemsstaterne udpeger eller opretter en uafhængig myndighed som national uafhængig tilsynsmyndighed , der skal sikre, at de foranstaltninger, der træffes for at efterkomme dette direktiv, anvendes korrekt, samt mindst varetage de opgaver, det pålægges i henhold til artikel 5.
Member States shall nominate or establish an independent authority as their national independent supervisory authority in order to ensure the correct application of the measures taken to comply with this Directive and to assume, at least, the tasks assigned under Article 5.
Denne myndighed kan være den samme som den, medlemsstaten pålægger at varetage gennemførelsen af de yderligere reguleringsforanstaltninger, der henvises til i artikel 1, stk. 5, herunder godkendelse af afgiftssystemet og/eller lufthavnsafgiftsniveauet, forudsat at myndigheden opfylder kravene i nærværende artikels stk. 2.
Such an authority may be the same as the entity entrusted by a Member State with the application of the additional regulatory measures referred to in Article 1(5), including with the approval of the charging system and/or the level of airport charges, provided that it meets the requirements of paragraph 2 of this Article.
Samtidig med, at national lovgivning overholdes, må dette direktivs bestemmelser ikke hindre den uafhængige tilsynsmyndighed i under sit tilsyn og fulde ansvar at uddelegere gennemførelsen af dette direktiv til andre uafhængige tilsynsmyndigheder, forudsat at gennemførelsen finder sted i overensstemmelse med de samme standarder.
In compliance with national law, the provisions of this Directive shall not prevent the independent supervisory authority from delegating, under its supervision and full responsibility, the implementation of this Directive to other independent supervisory authorities, provided that implementation takes place in accordance with the same standards.