natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Miljøagenturet anfører videre, at der er mange indbyrdes forbundne aktiviteter, som påvirker biodiversiteten.
"There are many inter-related activities that have an impact on biodiversity.
Agenturet mener, at vurderinger skal integreres, og at forskellige eksperter og berørte parter skal inddrages.
Assessments need to be integrated and involve a wide range of expertise and concerned citizens.
På tværs af EU er der kun begrænsede og meget forskelligartede oplysninger om status for og udvikling i biodiversiteten.
In addition, information is limited and inconsistent across Europe on the state and trends in biodiversity.
Denne situation vil sandsynligvis hurtigt ændre sig, da overvågning af biodiversitet er tidskrævende, bekostelig og vanskelig at prioritere og derfor kun har modtaget relativ beskeden støtte indtil videre .
This situation is unlikely to change quickly since biodiversity monitoring is quite time consuming, costly and difficult to prioritise and hence has received relatively little attention for funding."
I dag kan visse Natura 2000-forvaltningsaktiviteter finansieres under landdistrikts- og samhørighedspolitikken.
At present certain Natura 2000 management activities can be financed under rural development and cohesion policies.
Indtil nu er midlerne fra disse instrumenter i flere tilfælde blevet anvendt på Natura 2000-lokaliteter med godt resultat.
To-date, funds from these instruments have been used successfully in Natura 2000 sites in a number of instances.
Omfanget har været begrænset, hvilket viser, at status quo opretholdes, hvis der ikke tildeles en prioritering under de relevante forordninger, og at der vil ikke blive etableret et strategisk finansieret net.
However, coverage has been limited, demonstrating that if not given a priority under the relevant regulations, the status quo, will be maintained and a strategically financed network will not be achieved.
Kommissionen foreslår ikke, at gennemførelsen af Natura 2000-nettet gøres obligatorisk for nogen af de omhandlede fonde.
The Commission does not propose to make the implementation of the Natura 2000 network obligatory in any of the concerned Funds.
Uden yderligere tilpasning af de relevante forordninger vil en sådan tilgang kunne bringe biodiversiteten i fare, idet det vil svare til en såkaldt "optimistisk" tilgang.
Without further adjustment to the relevant regulations, this approach may be seen as putting biodiversity at risk, with what could be termed as an 'optimistic' approach.
Det er kendetegnende, at Kommissionen anfører: "Lad os nu se, hvordan medlemsstaterne vil integrere de forhåndenværende muligheder i deres programmer og planer for den næste finansieringsperiode."
It is significant that the Commission states that: "it remains to be seen how the Member States will integrate the available opportunities in their programmes and plans for the next financial period."
Kommissionen anfører videre: "Det er imidlertid ikke muligt at fastsætte et mål for støttesatsen, fordi de endelige udgifter vil afhænge af, hvilken prioritet der tillægges Natura 2000 i de enkelte medlemsstaters programmer".
Further the Commission states: "It is however, not possible to fix a target for the level of this funding since the final expenditure will depend on the priority given to Natura within individual member states programmes".
Med mindre end seks år tilbage inden 2010 må det betragtes som urealistisk, hvis man forventer, at de administrative systemer vil udvikle sig og skabe omfattende forbedringer i biodiversiteten, uden at der findes en biodiversitetsfond, som kan fremme mainstreamingprocessen.
With less than six years to go before 2010, it is considered unrealistic to expect administrative structures to evolve and deliver large-scale biodiversity gains without maintaining a biodiversity fund to facilitate the mainstreaming process.
Det ville være politisk og praktisk beklageligt, hvis EU på nuværende tidspunkt opgav sin eneste særlige biodiversitetsfond.
It would be politically and practically regrettable if the EU were to abandon its only dedicated biodiversity fund at this time.
Life-Natur har vist sig at være vellykket og har givet valuta for pengene med hensyn til at skabe biodiversitets­forbedringer og har generelt været en succeshistorie for EU's biodiversitetspolitikker.
LIFE-Nature has proved successful and good value for money in terms of delivering biodiversity benefits, and has been a success story for the EU’s biodiversity policies.
Opretholdelse af en tilpasset biodiversitetsfond efter 2006 vil sikre en løsningsmodel baseret på "forbedret integration".
Maintaining an adapted biodiversity fund after 2006 would deliver what can be called ‘enhanced integration’ option.
Selv om Kommissionen i princippet kan have ret i, at integreringstilgangen på lang sigt vil være den mest effektive løsning, er det særdeles tvivlsomt, om denne tilgang vil fungere i praksis.
Even though the Commission in principle, may be correct, that the integration approach is the most effective in the long term, serious doubts exist as to whether this approach will work in practise.
En fuldt integreret tilgang og ophøret af en særlig biodiversitetsfond bør derfor kun være gældende fra den dag, hvor Kommissionen kan garantere Europa-Parlamentet, at integrationstilgangen fungerer tilfredsstillende.
A fully integrated approach and the end of a dedicated biodiversity fund should therefore only apply from the day when the Commission can assure the European Parliament that the integration approach is working properly.
Kommissionen opfordres til hurtigt at iværksætte en række tilpasninger af de eksisterende fonde.
The Commission is invited to rapidly adopt a number of adjustments to existing funds.
Sammen med forslag om begrænsning af den belastning, der forårsages af menneskelige aktiviteter inden for andre sektorer, vil der være et solidt grundlag for ikke at forlænge specifikke diversitetsfonde, når processen med opfyldelse af Göteborg-målet udmønter sig i resultater.
Together with proposals on limiting the pressures that human activities cause in other sectors, there would be a sound basis for not prolonging specific diversity funds, when the process of achieving the Gothenburg goal is evident.
Ordføreren nærer i øjeblikket stor tvivl om Kommissionens henstilling, hvis den ikke ledsages af overbevisende forpligtelser.
At present your rapporteur has serious doubts about the Commission recommendation, if no strong commitments are made at the same time.
Ligesom Kommissionens egen ekspertgruppe mener ordføreren, at medlemsstaterne og EU i fællesskab er ansvarlige for Natura 2000-nettet, eftersom naturen ikke respekterer politiske grænser, og at EU-fondene derfor skal dække lokaliteterne og deres forvaltningsaktiviteter.
In agreement with the Commission’s own expert Working Group, your Rapporteur believes that as nature does not respect political boundaries, the Natura 2000 network is a joint responsibility between the Community and Member States, and therefore EU funds should cover sites and their management activities.
til Udvalget om Miljø, Folkesundhed og Fødevaresikkerhed
for the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
om finansiering af Natura 2000
on Financing Natura 2000
Udvalget om Landbrug og Udvikling af Landdistrikter opfordrer Udvalget om Miljø, Folkesundhed og Fødevaresikkerhed, som er korresponderende udvalg, til at indarbejde følgende forslag i det beslutningsforslag, det vedtager:
The Committee on Agriculture calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. der henviser til, at formålet med Natura 2000-nettet er at oprette et virkeligt europæisk naturbeskyttelsesnetværk, som tager udgangspunkt i de foranstaltninger, der gennemføres i henhold til fugledirektivet
A. whereas the Natura 2000 network is intended to lead to a genuinely European nature conservation network, based on the measures adopted in the Birds Directive
Rådets direktiv 92/43/EØF af 21.5.1992 om bevaring af naturtyper samt vilde dyr og planter (EFT L 206 af 22.7.1992, s. 7). ,
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
C. der henviser til, at den belastende finansiering af naturbeskyttelse og Natura 2000-nettet bør fordeles ligeligt mellem alle EU's borgere,
C. whereas the burden of financing nature conservation and the Natura 2000 network should be shared fairly by all EU citizens,
D. der henviser til, at reformen af den fælles landbrugspolitik i 2003 i væsentlig grad vil medføre en stigning i udgifterne for de europæiske landmænd som følge af bestemmelserne om sammenkædning af støtte og miljøkrav,
D. whereas the 2003 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy will significantly increase the costs incurred by Europe's farmers due to the provisions on cross-compliance,
E. der henviser til, at landmænd og skovejere med deres forvaltningsform i væsentlig grad kan bidrage til bevarelse og bæredygtig udnyttelse af biodiversiteten på land- og skovbrugsarealer, og at dette i mange tilfælde vil resultere i ekstraomkostninger, der bør kompenseres behørigt,
E. whereas farmers and forest owners can make a significant contribution to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity on farmland through their management practices, and in many cases this results in additional spending which must be adequately compensated,
F. der henviser til, at Kommissionen i sin meddelelse har foretaget en analyse af tre forskellige muligheder for fremtidig finansiering af Natura 2000-nettet,
F. whereas the European Commission analyses three different scenarios for the future financing of the Natura 2000 network in its communication,
G. der henviser til, at Rådet i 2002 fastlagde landbrugsbudgettet uden at tage hensyn til de ekstraomkostninger, som opfyldelsen af de forpligtelser, Fællesskabet påtog sig med habitatdirektivet, ville påføre landmænd og skovejere,
G. whereas in 2002 the Council set the farm budget without taking account of the extra costs to farmers and forest owners arising from the application of the commitments entered into by the Community with the Habitats Directive,
3. er imidlertid bekymret over den store forsinkelse, der kan konstateres i oprettelsen af Natura 2000-nettet, og som vanskeliggør et mere præcist skøn over finansieringsbehovet og en mere effektiv planlægning og koordinering af de omhandlede tiltag; beklager, at Kommissionens meddelelse ikke indeholder et mere præcist skøn over udgifterne til Natura 2000-nettet, og at der ikke i tilstrækkelig grad er taget højde for, at de kommende udvidelser af Den Europæiske Union reelt vil indebære, at nettets ressourcer reduceres, da et større område skal beskyttes med det samme beløb; henstiller derfor til Kommissionen at foretage et nyt og mere præcist skøn, hvor der tages højde for de faktiske udgifter til Natura 2000;
Is concerned, however, at the long delay recorded in the completion of the Natura 2000 network and the negative consequences this entails for both the more precise estimate of its funding requirements and the more effective planning and coordination of the actions it comprises; regrets that the Commission's communication does not provide a more precise estimate of the costs of the Natura 2000 network, and that insufficient account has been taken of the fact that the forthcoming enlargements of the Union will indeed entail a reduction in resources for the network, given that a larger protected area will have to be subsidised from the same amounts; calls on the Commission, in this context, to draw up a new and more precise estimate which includes the real costs of the Natura 2000 network;
- de nødvendige udgifter til erstatninger til bestemte berørte befolkningsgrupper i områder inden for netværket,
- the spending needed in order to compensate specific sections of the population affected in areas included in the network;
- de reelle behov i det udvidede EU's medlemsstater,
- the real needs of the Member States of the enlarged Union;
- drøftelserne om de finansielle perspektiver for 2007-2013, som kan få afgørende betydning for den fremtidige kurs for finansieringen af nettet og mere generelt for EU's politikker;
- the debate on the 2007-2013 financial perspective, which may have a catalytic effect on the future course of funding for the network, as well as Union policies in more general terms;
12. understreger, at en yderligere udvikling og opretholdelse af Natura 2000-nettet primært bør ske via langfristede forvaltningsaftaler med landmændene og andre private brugere af landarealer og ikke via køb af landarealer.
Stresses that further development and maintenance of the Natura 2000 network should be achieved preferably not through land acquisition but through long-term management contracts with farmers and other private land-users.
UDTALELSE FRA REGIONALUDVIKLINGSUDVALGET
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development
Rådgivende ordfører: Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski
Draftswoman: Jillian Evans
Regionaludviklingsudvalget opfordrer Udvalget om Miljø, Folkesundhed og Fødevaresikkerhed, som er korresponderende udvalg, til at indarbejde følgende forslag i det beslutningsforslag, det vedtager:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. konstaterer, at sunde økosystemer skaber vigtige sociale og økonomiske ressourcer og rekreationsmuligheder samt støtte til landbrug og fiskeri;
Notes that healthy ecosystems provide important social and economic resources as well as recreation opportunities and support for farming and fisheries;
7. påpeger, at støtte fra strukturfondene til Natura 2000 er i overensstemmelse med Cardiff-processen om integration af miljøhensyn i alle vigtige politikker , and that it should in any case guarantee adequate funding within the Structural Fund objectives ;
Points out that structural fund funding for Natura 2000 is in accordance with the Cardiff Process of integrating environmental considerations in all key policy areas, and that it should in any case guarantee adequate funding within the Structural Fund objectives;
Emphasises that structural funds cannot be the only source of EU funding for the Natura 2000 networks and that funding should be coordinated with the rural development fund, LIFE+ and a dedicated fund ;
Emphasises that structural funds cannot be the only source of EU funding for the Natura 2000 networks and that funding should be coordinated with the rural development fund, LIFE+ and a dedicated fund.
Calls on the Commission to guarantee adequate financing of Natura 2000, whether by means of a specific instrument, or by increasing the funding for LIFE + by including an item earmarked for biodiversity conservation, which will allow the objectives to made met ;
Calls on the Commission to guarantee adequate financing of Natura 2000, whether by means of a specific instrument, or by increasing the funding for LIFE + by including an item earmarked for biodiversity conservation, which will allow the objectives to made met;
Støtter Kommissionens hensigt om at offentliggøre en detaljeret vejledning i, hvordan midler fra strukturfondene kan anvendes til at støtte Natura 2000-nettet and calls on the Commission to make good its assurances that Natura 2000 financing will be listed as a priority in the forthcoming Community Strategic Guidelines for Cohesion Policy ;
Supports the Commission's intention to publish detailed guidance on how to use the structural funds to support the Natura 2000 network and calls on the Commission to make good its assurances that Natura 2000 financing will be listed as a priority in the forthcoming Community Strategic Guidelines for Cohesion Policy;
Calls for all the planning instruments to be integrated into a single Operational Plan, which will take a strategic development approach ;
Calls for all the planning instruments to be integrated into a single Operational Plan, which will take a strategic development approach;
Calls for objective supports to be established to develop alternative productive, job-creating and wealth-generating economic activities with the objective of strengthening the local economic fabric, and likewise the establishment of effective measures to protect and enhance local economic resources and products, with due attention to their specific characteristics and their importance in the local economies ;
Calls for objective supports to be established to develop alternative productive, job-creating and wealth-generating economic activities with the objective of strengthening the local economic fabric, and likewise the establishment of effective measures to protect and enhance local economic resources and products, with due attention to their specific characteristics and their importance in the local economies;
14. points out that since the Natura 2000 network benefits the entire Union and responds to Community-level objectives, it should not represent additional costs to those Member States where biological diversity is greater and the protected areas more extensive, as laid down in Directive 92/43/EEC; calls on the Commission, for this reason, to take due account, when dealing with proposals for co-funding, of the pr oportionality criterion in respect of the protected area within the various Member States;
Points out that since the Natura 2000 network benefits the entire Union and responds to Community-level objectives, it should not represent additional costs to those Member States where biological diversity is greater and the protected areas more extensive, as laid down in Directive 92/43/EEC; calls on the Commission, for this reason, to take due account, when dealing with proposals for co-funding, of the proportionality criterion in respect of the protected area within the various Member States;
Calls for the recognition, by means of encouraging and spreading best-practice, of those territorial units which demonstrate their ability to manage their respective Natura 2000 areas cost-efficiently in both environmental and financial terms ;
Calls for the recognition, by means of encouraging and spreading best-practice, of those territorial units which demonstrate their ability to manage their respective Natura 2000 areas cost-efficiently in both environmental and financial terms;
Draws attention to the need to use adequate monitoring to ensure that the institutes responsible for nature conservation are actually equipped with the requisite human and financial resources to perform their nature conservation duties ;
Draws attention to the need to use adequate monitoring to ensure that the institutes responsible for nature conservation are actually equipped with the requisite human and financial resources to perform their nature conservation duties;
Stresses the importance of involving the national parliaments, the social partners, civil society and regional and local authorities in implementing these objectives, by encouraging promoting proper public consultation ;
Stresses the importance of involving the national parliaments, the social partners, civil society and regional and local authorities in implementing these objectives, by encouraging promoting proper public consultation;
REGI 28.11.2004
REGI 28.11.2004
Jillian Evans 25.11.2004
Jillian Evans 25.11.2004
Inés Ayala Sender, Thijs Berman, Philip Bradbourn, Jan Březina, Brigitte Douay, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Richard Falbr, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Toomas Savi, László Surján, Paavo Väyrynen, Manfred Weber
Inés Ayala Sender, Thijs Berman, Philip Bradbourn, Jan Březina, Brigitte Douay, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Richard Falbr, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Toomas Savi, László Surján, Paavo Väyrynen, Manfred Weber
REGI 28.10.2004
REGI 28.10.2004
BUDG 15.12.2004
BUDG 15.12.2004
Margrete Auken 27.9.2004
Margrete Auken 27.9.2004
Adamos Adamou, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frederika Brepoels, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetete, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Marios Matsakis, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer and Åsa Westlund.
Adamos Adamou, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frederika Brepoels, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Marios Matsakis, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer and Åsa Westlund.
Margrete Auken, María del Pilar Ayuso González, Bairbre de Brún, Christofer Fjellner, Milan Gaľa, Hélene Goudin, Jutta D. Haug, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Urszula Krupa, Alojz Peterle, María Isabel Salinas García, Renate Sommer, Bart Staes, Robert Sturdy, Andres Tarand, Claude Turmes and Phillip Whitehead.
Margrete Auken, María del Pilar Ayuso González, Bairbre de Brún, Christofer Fjellner, Milan Gaľa, Hélène Goudin, Jutta D. Haug, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Urszula Krupa, Alojz Peterle, María Isabel Salinas García, Renate Sommer, Bart Staes, Robert Sturdy, Andres Tarand, Claude Turmes and Phillip Whitehead.
om forslag til Rådets forordning om foranstaltninger til genopretning af tungebestandene i den vestlige del af Den Engelske Kanal og i Biscayabugten
on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing measures for the recovery of the sole stocks in the Western Channel and the Bay of Biscay
– der henviser til Kommissionens forslag til Rådet ( KOM(2003)0819 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2003)0819 )
– der henviser til EF-traktatens artikel 37, der danner grundlag for Rådets høring af Parlamentet ( C5–0047/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C5‑0047/2004 ),
– der henviser til betænkning fra Fiskeriudvalget ( A6–0050/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0050/2005 ),
Rådets forordning om foranstaltninger til genopretning af tungebestandene i den vestlige del af Den Engelske Kanal og i Biscayabugten
Council regulation establishing measures for the recovery of the sole stocks in the Western Channel and the Bay of Biscay
Rådets forordning om en forvaltningsplan for tungebestandene i den vestlige del af Den Engelske Kanal og i Biscayabugten
Council regulation establishing a management plan for sole stocks in the Western Channel and the Bay of Biscay
(Denne ændring medfører, at betragtningerne om den nuværende bestand samt omtalen af genopretningsplanen i hele den dispositive del skal ændres.)
(This amendment entails changes to the recitals on the state of stocks and to references to the recovery plan throughout the text.)
De seneste tilgængelige videnskabelige rapporter viser, at tungebestanden ikke befinder sig under de sikre biologiske grænser.
The most recent scientific reports indicate that sole stocks are not below the biological safety threshold.
I stedet for at vedtage en genopretningsplan, jf. artikel 5 i forordning (EF) nr. 2371/2002, er det derfor at foretrække at vedtage en forvaltningsplan, jf. artikel 6.
Consequently, instead of adopting the recovery plan referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, it is preferable to adopt the management plan referred to in Article 6.
Dette gør det overflødigt at indføre foranstaltninger til forvaltning af fiskeriindsatsen for denne art.
This makes it unnecessary to adopt measures to manage fishing effort for this species.