natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For lineære audiovisuelle medietjenester eller fjernsynsudsendelser, som også tilbydes direkte eller tidsforskudt som ikke-lineære tjenester af den samme medietjenesteudbyder, betragtes direktivets krav som opfyldt ved den lineære udsendelse.
For linear audiovisual media services or television programmes which are also offered on a live or deferred basis as non-linear services by the same media service provider, the requirements of this Directive are deemed to be met by the linear transmission.
Når forskellige former for tjenester tilbydes parallelt, uden at den ene part klart er underlagt den anden, bør dette direktiv imidlertid stadig være gældende for de specifikke dele af tjenesten, der opfylder alle kriterierne for en audiovisuel medietjeneste.
However, where different kinds of services are offered in parallel, without one part being clearly subordinate to another, this Directive should still apply to those distinguishable parts of the service which fulfil all the criteria of an audiovisual media service.
BETRAGTNING 14 B (ny)
RECITAL 14 B new
(14b) Definitionerne i dette direktiv, især definitionerne af tv-spredning og lineære og ikke-lineære tjenester, gælder kun for dette direktiv og berører ikke de pågældende grundlæggende rettigheder under lovgivningen om ophavsret og beslægtede rettigheder.
(14b) The definitions in this Directive, in particular the definitions of television broadcasting, linear and non-linear services, are laid down only for the purposes of this Directive and do not affect the underlying rights protected by copyright and neighbouring rights legislation.
Omfanget af og rammevilkårene for disse rettigheder berøres ikke af disse definitioner og reguleres fortsat uafhængigt af den relevante lovgivning.
The scope and regime of these rights are not prejudiced by these definitions and continue to be regulated independently by the relevant legislation.
(15) Dette direktiv omfatter ikke elektroniske udgaver af aviser og blade.
(15) This Directive does not cover electronic versions of newspapers and magazines.
I overensstemmelse med direktiv 2000/31/EF er også hasardspil undtaget.
In accordance with Directive 2000/31/EC, games of chance are also excluded from its scope.
Præcisering af, at disse tjenester, hvis hovedformål ikke er en transmission af audiovisuelle tjenester, er undtaget fra direktivets anvendelsesområde.
Seeks to clarify that these services, which do not have the transmission of audiovisual services as their principal purpose, are excluded from the scope of the directive.
(16) Udtrykket 'audiovisuel' betegner levende billeder med eller uden lyd og omfatter således stumfilm, men ikke lydtransmission eller radio .
(16) The term “audiovisual” refers to moving images with or without sound, so includes silent films but does not cover audio transmission or radio.
(16) I dette direktiv betegner udtrykket 'audiovisuel' levende billeder med eller uden lyd og omfatter således stumfilm, men ikke lydtransmission eller radiotjenester .
(16) For the purposes of this Directive, the term “audiovisual” refers to moving images with or without sound, so includes silent films but does not cover audio transmission or radio services .
Udtrykket "audiovisuelle tjenester" omfatter i andre europæiske og internationale retsakter som f.eks. i WTO's klassifikation af tjenesteydelser under pkt. D foruden fjernsyn også radio.
In other European and international legal acts, such as point 2.D of the WTO services classification list, the term “audiovisual services” covers radio as well as television.
Det skal være sikret, at nærværende direktiv ikke berører disse definitioner, og at radio i øvrigt fortsat er en del af de audiovisuelle tjenester.
It needs to be ensured that this directive does not affect those definitions and also that radio remains covered by the definition of audiovisual services.
(16a) En audiovisuel medietjeneste består af programmer, dvs. en i sig selv sluttet rækkefølge af levende billeder med eller uden lyd under redaktionelt ansvar, som enten distribueres af en medietjenesteudbyder i et fast tidsskema eller er samlet i et katalog.
(16a) An audiovisual media service consists of programmes, i.e. a discrete succession of moving images with or without sound which are subject to editorial responsibility and are either transmitted by a media service provider in accordance with a set time schedule or arranged in a catalogue.
Udtrykket "program" omfatter audiovisuelle medietjenester og skal derfor have en separat definition.
The term “programme” is characteristic of audiovisual media services and therefore requires a separate definition.
(17) Begrebet 'redaktionelt ansvar' er afgørende for definitionen af medietjenesteudbyderens rolle og dermed for definitionen af audiovisuelle medietjenester.
(17) The notion of editorial responsibility is essential for defining the role of the media service provider and thereby for the definition of audiovisual media services.
Dette direktiv berører ikke de fritagelser for ansvar, der er fastsat i direktiv 2000/31/EF.
This Directive is without prejudice to the liability exemptions established in Directive 2000/31/EC.
Ved "redaktionelt ansvar" forstås ansvaret for udvælgelse og organisation af indholdet i et audiovisuelt udbud på professionel basis.
“Editorial responsibility” means responsibility for the selection and organisation, on a professional basis, of the content of an audiovisual offer.
Dette kan gælde for enkeltstående indhold eller en samling indhold.
This may apply to an individual content or a collection of contents.
Et sådant redaktionelt ansvar omfatter programsammensætningen i tilfælde af tv-udsendelser, eller programkataloget i tilfælde af ikke-lineære tjenester.
Such editorial responsibility applies to the composition of the schedule, in the case of television programmes, or to the programme listing, in the case of non-linear services.
Præcisering af kriteriet for det redaktionelle ansvar.
Clarifies the criterion of editorial responsibility.
Det er nødvendigt at undgå, at der skabes en slags "smuthul", hvorigennem redaktionelt ansvar let kan eksporteres uden for EU med den eventuelle virkning, at direktivet ikke længere er gældende.
It is necessary to prevent the creation of a kind of "loophole", whereby editorial responsibility could easily be exported outside the EU, with the possible effect that the Directive would no longer apply.
Jf. også ændringsforslaget til artikel 1, stk. 2.
See also amendment for Article 1 paragraph 2
BETRAGTNING 17 A (ny)
RECITAL 17 B (new)
(17a) De kriterier, der danner grundlag for definitionen af audiovisuelle medietjenester, som fastsat i artikel 1, litra a), i dette direktiv, og som præciseret i dette direktivs betragtning 13 til 17, skal opfyldes samtidigt.
(17b) The criteria laid down in the definition of audiovisual media services, as set out in Article 1(a) of this Directive and expanded in Recitals 13 to 17 of this Directive, must be fulfilled simultaneously.
Det er vigtig at gøre opmærksom på og understrege, at de kriterier, som Kommissionen har fastsat i betragtning 13 til 17, skal overholdes samtidig.
It is important to point out and emphasise that the criteria presented by the Commission in recitals 13 to 17 have to be fulfilled simultaneously
(18) Ud over reklame og teleshopping defineres det bredere begreb 'audiovisuel kommerciel kommunikation'.
(18) In addition to advertising and teleshopping, the wider definition of audiovisual commercial communication is introduced.
Formuleringen svarer bedre til de forskellige former for reklame.
This wording more closely reflects the various types of advertising.
(19) Oprindelseslandsprincippet er fortsat kernen i dette direktiv, da det er uomgængeligt for etableringen af et indre marked.
(19) The country of origin principle remains the core of this Directive, as it is essential for the creation of an internal market.
Derfor skal det princip anlægges over for alle audiovisuelle medietjenester, således at medietjenesteudbyderne får den retssikkerhed at arbejde under, der er nødvendig som grundlag for nye forretningsmodeller og udbygning af disse tjenester.
This principle must therefore be applied to all audiovisual media services in order to ensure legal certainty for media service providers as the necessary basis for new business models and the deployment of these services.
Det er også en forudsætning for den frie udveksling af informationer og audiovisuelle programmer på det indre marked.
It is also essential in order to ensure the free flow of information and audiovisual programmes in the internal market.
Anvendelsen af dette princip kan ikke udelukke en henvisning til kriterierne for oprindelsen af en tjenestes ressourcer med henblik på at sikre betingelserne for fair konkurrence.
The application of this principle cannot exclude a reference to the criteria of the origin of the resources of a service with a view to ensuring the conditions for fair competition .
Oprindelseslandsprincippet ligger til grund for dette direktivforslag.
The country of origin principle is fundamental to the proposed Directive.
Medlemsstaterne skal på de områder, der samordnes af direktivet, kunne anvende strengere regler på audiovisuelle medietjenesteudbydere under deres jurisdiktion.
Member States must be able to apply stricter rules in the fields coordinated by the Directive to audiovisual media service providers under their jurisdiction.
Kodificeringen af Domstolens retspraksis og indførelsen af nye kriterier baseret på kriterierne for oprindelsen af en tjenestes ressourcer kombineret med en mere effektiv procedure er en rimelig løsning, som tager højde for medlemsstaternes interesser uden at rejse tvivl om oprindelseslandsprincippet.
The codification of Court of Justice case-law and the introduction of new criteria based on the origin of a service’s resources, combined with a more efficient procedure, offers an appropriate solution which takes account of Member States’ concerns without calling into question the country of origin principle.
(19a) Med henblik på at fremme en stærk, konkurrencedygtig og integreret europæisk audiovisuel industri og øge mediepluralismen i Den Europæiske Union er det af afgørende betydning, at kun én medlemsstat bør have jurisdiktion over for en audiovisuel medietjenesteudbyder, og at informationspluralismen bør være et grundlæggende princip inden for Den Europæiske Union.
(19a) To promote a strong, competitive and integrated European audiovisual industry and enhance media pluralism throughout the European Union, it remains essential that only one Member State should have jurisdiction over an audiovisual media service provider and that pluralism of information should be a fundamental principle of the European Union.
BETRAGTNING 19 B (ny)
RECITAL 19 B (new)
(19b) Der er derfor afgørende, at medlemsstaterne forhindrer, at der opstår dominerende stillinger, der kan føre til en begrænsning af pluralismen, af mediernes informationsfrihed og af informationssektoren som helhed, f.eks. ved at træffe foranstaltninger for at sikre ikke-diskriminerende adgang til audiovisuelle medietjenester i offentlighedens interesse (f.eks. gennem regler om forsyningspligt).
(19b) It is ther e fore essential that the Member States pr e vent the emergence of dominant pos i tions that would lead to a limit a tion of pluralism and r e strictions on fre e dom of media info r mation as well as on the information se c tor as a wh o le, for instance by taking mea s ures to secure non-discriminatory access to audi o visual media service offe r ings in the public inte r est, e.g. through must-carry rules.
(20) Den teknologiske udvikling, især inden for digitale satellitprogrammer, betyder, at der må anlægges subsidiære kriterier for at sikre, at reguleringen bliver hensigtsmæssig og gennemføres effektivt, og for at give aktørerne faktisk magt over indholdet af en tjeneste , der udbyder audiovisuelle programmer.
(20) Technological developments, especially with regard to digital satellite programmes, mean that subsidiary criteria need to be adapted in order to ensure suitable regulation and effective implementation and to give players genuine power over the content of an audiovisual content service.
(20) Den teknologiske udvikling, især inden for digitale satellitprogrammer, betyder, at der må anlægges subsidiære kriterier for at sikre, at reguleringen bliver hensigtsmæssig og gennemføres effektivt, og for at give aktørerne faktisk magt over indholdet af en medietjeneste , der udbyder audiovisuelle programmer.
(20) Technological developments, especially with regard to digital satellite programmes, mean that subsidiary criteria need to be adapted in order to ensure suitable regulation and effective implementation and to give players genuine power over the content of an audiovisual media service.
Redaktionel præcisering.
Editorial clarification.
(23) Medlemsstaterne må kunne anlægge strengere regler over for medietjenesteudbydere under deres jurisdiktion på de områder, der samordnes i dette direktiv.
(23) Member States must be able to apply stricter rules in the fields coordinated by this Directive to media service providers under their jurisdiction.
En passende måde, hvorpå det kan sikres, at sådanne regler ikke omgås, vil være at kodificere Domstolens retspraksis og i tilknytning hertil indføre en mere effektiv procedure, for med denne løsning kan man tage hensyn til medlemsstaternes interesser uden at skabe tvivl om, hvorvidt oprindelseslandsprincippet anvendes korrekt.
To ensure that such rules are not circumvented, the codification of the case law of the European Court of Justice, combined with a more efficient procedure, is an appropriate solution that takes account of Member State concerns without calling into question the proper application of the country of origin principle.
(23) Medlemsstaterne må kunne anlægge strengere regler over for medietjenesteudbydere under deres jurisdiktion på de områder, der samordnes i dette direktiv , samtidig med at de sikrer, at disse regler er i overensstemmelse med Fællesskabets konkurrencelovgivning .
(23) Member States must be able to apply stricter rules in the fields coordinated by this Directive to media service providers under their jurisdiction , while ensuring that those rules are consistent with Community competition law .
Medlemsstaternes mulighed for at træffe særlige foranstaltninger i forbindelse med dette direktiv må ikke føre til en krænkelse af de grundliggende bestemmelser i konkurrencelovgivningen.
Allowing Member States the possibility to apply specific measures in the context of this Directive must not lead to infringement of the basic rules of competition law.
(23a) For i hvert enkelt tilfælde at føre bevis for, at en medietjenesteudbyder, der er etableret i en anden medlemsstat, omgår en medlemsstats regler, kan denne medlemsstat henholde sig til indikatorer som reklame- og/eller abonnementsindtægternes oprindelse, tjenestens hovedsprog eller forekomsten af programmer eller kommerciel kommunikation, som specifikt er rettet mod befolkningen i den medlemsstat, hvor de modtages.
(23a) In order for a Member State to prove on a case-by-case basis that a media service provider established in another Member State is circumventing its rules, that Member State may cite indicators such as the origin of the advertising and/or subscription revenues, the main language of the service or the existence of programmes or commercial communications targeted specifically at the public in the Member State where they are received.
(Svarer til artikel 3, stk. 1 b)
(Corresponding to Article 3 point 1b)
(24) Uanset oprindelseslandsprincippet kan medlemsstaterne under dette direktiv på visse betingelser, jf. direktivets artikel 2a, og efter at have fulgt den procedure, direktivet fastlægger, træffe foranstaltninger, som begrænser den frie bevægelighed for tv-spredningsvirksomhed.
(24) Under this Directive, notwithstanding the application of the country of origin principle, Member States may still take measures that restrict the freedom of movement of television broadcasting, but only under certain conditions listed in Article 2a of this Directive and following the procedure laid down in this Directive.
Ifølge fast praksis ved Domstolen skal enhver begrænsning i den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser, som enhver anden afvigelse fra et grundlæggende traktatprincip, fortolkes restriktivt.
However, the European Court of Justice has consistently held that any restriction of the freedom to provide services, such as any derogation from a fundamental principle of the Treaty, must be interpreted restrictively.
(24) Uanset oprindelseslandsprincippet kan medlemsstaterne under dette direktiv på visse betingelser, jf. direktivets artikel 2a, og efter at have fulgt den procedure, direktivet fastlægger, træffe foranstaltninger, som begrænser den frie bevægelighed for tv-spredningsvirksomhed eller ikke-lineære audiovisuelle medietjenester .
(24) Under this Directive, notwithstanding the application of the country of origin principle, Member States may still take measures that restrict the freedom of movement of television broadcasting or non-linear audiovisual media services , but only under certain conditions listed in Article 2a of this Directive and following the procedure laid down in this Directive.
Ifølge fast praksis ved Domstolen skal enhver begrænsning i den frie udveksling af tjenesteydelser, som enhver anden afvigelse fra et grundlæggende traktatprincip, fortolkes restriktivt , navnlig med hensyn til beskyttelsen af mindreårige og sundheden, og altid under forudsætning af at der under ingen omstændigheder kan tillades forudgående kontrol af tanker eller synspunkter. .
However, the European Court of Justice has consistently held that any restriction of the freedom to provide services, such as any derogation from a fundamental principle of the Treaty, must be interpreted restrictively, with particular reference to the protection of minors and health and provided always that the ex ante control of ideas or opinions is not be permitted under any circumstances.
Hvad angår ikke-lineære audiovisuelle tjenester, erstatter muligheden for at træffe foranstaltninger i henhold til artikel 2a i dette direktiv de eventuelle foranstaltninger, som den pågældende medlemsstat hidtil har kunnet træffe, jf. artikel 3, stk. 4, og/eller artikel 12, stk. 3, i direktiv 2000/31/EF, for så vidt angår det område, der koordineres af artikel 3d og 3e i dette direktiv.
With respect to non-linear audiovisual services, the possibility of taking measures under Article 2a of this Directive replaces the possible measures which could have hitherto been taken by the Member State concerned as set out in Article 3(4) and/or Article 12 (3) of Directive 2000/31/EC within the area coordinated by Articles 3d and 3e of this Directive.
(25) I meddelelsen til Rådet og Europa-Parlamentet om bedre regulering for vækst og beskæftigelse i Den Europæiske Union understregede Kommissionen, at der måtte foretages en omhyggelig analyse af, hvilken reguleringsmetode der er mest hensigtsmæssig, og især om lovgivning er at foretrække i en bestemt sektor for et bestemt problem, eller om man bør overveje alternative metoder, f.eks. samregulering eller selvregulering.
(25) In its Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union the Commission stressed that a careful analysis on the appropriate regulatory approach, in particular whether legislation is preferable for the relevant sector and problem, or whether alternatives such as co-regulation or self regulation should be considered.
For samregulering og selvregulering findes de definitioner, kriterier og procedurer, der blev opnået enighed om, i den interinstitutionelle aftale om bedre lovgivning 1 .
For co-regulation and self-regulation, the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-making 1 provides agreed definitions, criteria and procedures.
Erfaringerne viste, at sam- og selvregulering, der gennemføres efter medlemsstaternes forskellige retstraditioner, kan spille en væsentlig rolle for realiseringen af en højere grad af forbrugerbeskyttelse.
Experience showed that co- and self-regulation instruments implemented in accordance with different legal traditions of Member States can play an important role in delivering a high level of consumer protection.
Endvidere viste erfaringerne, at både sam- og selvregulering, der gennemføres efter medlemsstaternes forskellige retstraditioner, kan spille en væsentlig rolle for realiseringen af en højere grad af forbrugerbeskyttelse.
Furthermore, experience showed that both co- and self-regulation instruments implemented in accordance with different legal traditions of Member States can play an important role in delivering a high level of consumer protection.
De foranstaltninger, der træffes for at gennemføre målsætninger af almen interesse inden for sektoren for nye audiovisuelle medietjenester, vil være mere effektive, hvis de træffes med aktiv støtte fra tjenesteudbyderne selv.
Measures aimed at achieving public interest objectives in the emerging audiovisual media services sector will be more effective if they are taken with the active support of the service providers themselves.
Selvregulering er således en slags frivilligt initiativ, som gør det muligt for de økonomiske operatører, arbejdsmarkedets parter, ngo'er eller foreninger selv at vedtage fælles retningslinjer.
Thus self regulation constitutes a type of voluntary initiative, which enables the economic operators, social partners, non-governmental organisations or associations to adopt common guidelines amongst themselves and for themselves.
Medlemsstaterne bør i overensstemmelse med deres forskellige retlige traditioner anerkende den effektive rolle, som effektiv selvregulering kan spille som supplement til den gældende lovgivning og de gældende retlige og/eller administrative mekanismer, samt dens positive bidrag til opfyldelsen af målene i dette direktiv.
Member States should, in accordance with their different legal traditions, recognise the effective role which effective self-regulation can play as a complement to the legislation and judicial and/or administrative mechanisms in place and its useful contribution to the achievement of the objectives of this Directive.
Selvregulering kan være en supplerende metode til gennemførelse af visse af dette direktivs bestemmelser, men kan dog ikke erstatte de nationale lovgivende myndigheders forpligtelse.
However, w hile self-regulation might be a complementary method of implementing certain provisions of this Directive, it cannot constitute a substitute for the obligation of the national legislator.
Samregulering skaber som minimum et "juridisk bånd" mellem selvregulering og de nationale lovgivende myndigheder i overensstemmelse med de retlige traditioner i medlemsstaterne.
Co-regulation gives, in its minimal form, a "legal link" between self-regulation and the national legislator in accordance with the legal traditions of the Member States.
(25a) Overbegrebet "samregulering" omfatter regulerende instrumenter, som er baseret på samarbejde mellem statslige instanser og selvregulerende instanser, og som på nationalt plan betegnes og er opbygget særdeles forskelligt.
(25a) The generic term “co-regulation” covers regulatory instruments which are based on cooperation between State bodies and self-regulating bodies, and vary widely in terms of their designations and structures at national level.
Den konkrete udformning af sådanne instrumenter afspejler den specifikke tradition for medieregulering i de enkelte medlemsstater.
The actual form which such instruments take reflects the specific tradition of media regulation in the individual Member States.
Det er fælles for samreguleringssystemerne, at oprindeligt statslige opgaver og mål gennemføres i samarbejde med de aktører, som er berørt af reguleringen.
What co-regulation systems have in common is that tasks and objectives which were originally the preserve of the State are achieved in cooperation with the players affected by regulation.
Parterne udpeges eller får bemyndigelse af staten, men skal selv sikre, at målet for regulering nås.
Designated or authorised by the State, it is for the participants themselves to guarantee the achievement of the regulatory objective.