natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Målsætningen bør være at øge kvindernes deltagelse på arbejdsmarkedet.
It must work with the aim of improving women's participation in the labour market.
Desuden skal kvindernes adgang til indflydelsesrige områder og stillinger forbedres.
Women's access to areas and positions of responsibility must also be promoted .
26a) Der bør udvises særlig opmærksomhed over for de grupper, der er underrepræsenteret i uddannelsessystemerne i Europa.
(26a) Special attention should be given to groups that are under represented in education and training systems in Europe .
Det overordnede mål med det integrerede program er at øge og intensivere bevidstheden i de europæiske samfund om, at vores viden konstant ændres og øges.
The general objective of the Integrated Programme is to heighten awareness in European society of the fact that our knowledge is constantly evolving and expanding.
Kun gennem livslang læring kan Fællesskabet udvikle sig til et vidensamfund med en bæredygtig økonomisk udvikling, flere og bedre job og større social samhørighed ved særlig hensyntagen til integrationen af kønsaspektet i alle typer af uddannelsessystemer og på alle niveauer i disse , samtidig med at der sikres en god beskyttelse af miljøet af hensyn til de kommende generationer.
Only lifelong learning can bring about the development of the Community as an advanced knowledge society, with sustainable economic development, more and better jobs and greater social cohesion, giving special consideration to the integration of a gender perspective in all types and at all levels of education and training systems, while ensuring good protection of the environment for future generations.
c) at styrke livslang lærings bidrag til personlig udvikling, social samhørighed, aktivt medborgerskab, ligestilling mellem kønnene ved afskaffelse af kønsstereotyperne i samfundet og deltagelse af personer med særlige behov
(c) to reinforce the contribution of lifelong learning to personal fulfilment, social cohesion, active citizenship, gender equality, through the elimination of social gender stereotypes, and the participation of people with special needs;
Artikel 1, stk. 3, litra c a (nyt)
Article 1, paragraph 3, point (c a) (new)
ca) at give alle adgang til muligheden for livslang læring og at gennemføre specifikke foranstaltninger til fordel for ugunstigt stillede personer som enlige forældre, mænd og kvinder på forældre- eller familieorlov, indvandrere samt kvinder og mænd, der bor i afsidesliggende områder eller lever i fattigdom
(ca) to provide access to lifelong learning opportunities for all, and to take specific action aimed at the most disadvantaged persons, such as single parents, men and women on parental or family leave, immigrants, and women and men living in remote or rural areas or in poverty;
e) at bidrage til øget deltagelse i livslang læring for personer i alle aldre og at udvise særlig opmærksomhed over for alle de grupper, som er underrepræsenteret i uddannelsessystemerne i Europa samt de grupper, der har vanskeligst ved at få adgang til arbejdslivet, navnlig kvinder
(e) to contribute to increased participation in lifelong learning by people of all ages, paying special attention to sections of the population that are under represented in the education and training systems in Europe and to those with the most difficulty in gaining access to the labour market, especially women ;
f) at fremme sprogindlæring og anvendelse af sprog for at sikre sproglig mangfoldighed
(f) to promote language learning and language use to ensure linguistic diversity;
Artikel 1, stk. 3, litra i a (nyt)
Article 1, paragraph 3, point (i a) (new)
ia) at overvåge, at der fuldt ud tages hensyn til begge køn, og at mænd og kvinder deltager i samme udstrækning inden for alle områder af de almene og erhvervsfaglige uddannelser i Europa
(ia) to ensure gender mainstreaming and the equal involvement of both men and women in all sectors of education and training in Europe .
Artikel 6, stk. 2, litra b, punkt vi a (nyt)
Article 6, paragraph 2, point (b), point (vi a) (new)
via) De skal have en relevant viden om integrering af kønsaspektet, ligesom de skal tage de nødvendige skridt til at gennemføre integreringen af dette aspekt i deres arbejde.
(via) they must have appropriate knowledge of gender mainstreaming and they must take necessary steps to apply gender mainstreaming throughout their work;
d) fremme ligestilling mellem mænd og kvinder og bidrage til at bekæmpe alle former for forskelsbehandling, der er baseret på køn, racemæssig eller etnisk oprindelse, religion eller tro, handicap, alder eller seksuel orientering.
(d) promoting equality between men and women and contributing to combating all forms of discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.
d) bidrage til at bekæmpe alle former for forskelsbehandling, der er baseret på køn, racemæssig eller etnisk oprindelse, religion eller tro, handicap, alder eller seksuel orientering.
(d) contributing to combating all forms of discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.
Artikel 12, litra d a (nyt)
Article 12, point (d a) (new)
da) at fremme ligestillingen mellem mænd og kvinder, at øge kvindernes erhvervsfrekvens og forbedre deres adgang til indflydelsesrige områder og stillinger ved at afskaffe kønsstereotyperne i samfundet
(da) promoting equality between men and women, improving women's participation in the labour market and access to areas and positions of responsibility and eliminating social gender stereotypes.
c) tilskynde til, at man tilegner sig et fremmedsprog nummer to
(c) to encourage the learning of a second foreign language ;
c) tilskynde til, at man tilegner sig fremmedsprog
(c) to encourage the learning of foreign languages ;
a) voksne elever med særlig hensyntagen til de grupper, som savner grundlæggende kvalifikationer, navnlig kvinder
(a) learners in adult education , paying special attention to sections of the population with no basic qualifications, especially women ;
Rådgivende ordfører Dato for valg
Draftsperson Date appointed
Katerina Batzeli, Jillian Evans, Anna Hedh, Sophia in 't Veld, Elisabeth Jeggle, Karin Jöns, Christa Klaß, Karin Resetarits, Zuzana Roithová, Marta Vincenzi
Katerina Batzeli, Jillian Evans, Anna Hedh, Sophia in 't Veld, Elisabeth Jeggle, Karin Jöns, Christa Klaß, Karin Resetarits, Zuzana Roithová, Marta Vincenzi
Etablering af et integreret handlingsprogram inden for livslang læring
An integrated action programme in the field of lifelong learning
art. 251, stk. 2, og art. 149, stk. 4, og artikel 150, stk. 4, EF
Articles 251(2) and 149(4) and 150(4)
CULT 15.09.2004
CULT 15.09.2004
FEMM 15.09.2004
FEMM 15.09.2004
ITRE 15.09.2004
ITRE 15.09.2004
om anmodning om ophævelse af Marios Matsakis’ immunitet
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Marios Matsakis
BILAG: Artikel 83 og 113 i Republikken Cyperns forfatning...................................................................8
ANNEX: Articles 83 and 113 of the Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus
om anmodning om ophævelse af Marios Matsakis' immunitet
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Marios Matsakis
– der henviser til anmodning af 20. september 2004 fra Republikkens Cyperns justitsminister om ophævelse af Marios Matsakis’ immunitet, hvorom der blev givet meddelelse på plenarmødet den 13. oktober 2004,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Marios Matsakis, forwarded by the Attorney-General of the Republic of Cyprus on 20 September 2004 and announced in plenary sitting on 13 October 2004,
– der henviser til skrivelse af 14. oktober 2004, hvorom der blev givet meddelelse om på plenarmødet den 14. oktober 2004, og hvori Marios Matsakis gør indsigelse mod justitsministerens beføjelse til at indgive anmodning om ophævelse af hans immunitet,
– having regard to the letter, announced at the plenary sitting of 14 October 2004, in which Marios Matsakis challenged the Attorney-General's authority to make such a request for waiver of his immunity,
– der henviser til to skrivelser af 13. oktober 2004 og 10. februar 2005 til Europa-Parlamentets formand fra Republikken Cyperns faste repræsentant, hvori denne bekræfter justitsministerens beføjelse til at anmode om ophævelse af et cypriotisk parlamentsmedlems immunitet.
– having regard to the two letters confirming the Attorney-General's authority to make a request for waiver of the immunity of a Cypriot MEP, sent by the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Cyprus on 13 October 2004 and on 10 February 2005 to the President of the European Parliament,
– der henviser til skrivelsen af 16. juni 2005 fra præsidenten for Cyperns højesteret,
– having regard to the letter sent by the President of the Supreme Court of Cyprus on 16 June 2005,
– der har hørt Marios Matsakis, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 7, stk. 3,
– having heard Marios Matsakis in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– der henviser til artikel 10 i protokollen af 8. april 1965 vedrørende Det Europæiske Fællesskabs privilegier og immuniteter samt artikel 6, stk. 2, i akten af 20. september 1976 om almindelige direkte valg af medlemmerne af Europa-Parlamentet,
– having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– der henviser til artikel 83 og 113 i Republikken Cyperns forfatning,
– having regard to Articles 83 and 113 of the Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus,
– der henviser til forretningsordenens artikel 6, stk. 2, og artikel 7,
– having regard to Rules 6(2) and 7, in particular paragraph 4 thereof, of its Rules of Procedure,
– der henviser til betænkning fra Retsudvalget ( A6‑0268/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0268/2005 ),
På plenarmødet den 13, oktober 2004 meddelte Europa-Parlamentets formand, at han havde modtaget en anmodning fra Republikken Cyperns justitsminister om ophævelse af Marios Matsakis’ parlamentariske immunitet.
At the plenary session of 13 October 2004 the President of the European Parliament announced that he had received a request from the Attorney-General of the Republic of Cyprus for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Mr Marios Matsakis.
Ophævelsen af hans immunitet er i henhold til artikel 10, litra a), i protokollen om privilegier og immuniteter og artikel 83, stk. 2, i Cyperns forfatning en forudsætning for at gennemføre en fuld strafferetlig efterforskning i to separate sager, hvor Matsakis’ forhold ønskes undersøgt.
The waiver of his immunity is indispensable, under Article 10 (a) of the PPI and Article 83(2) of the Constitution of Cyprus, in order to to enable a full criminal investigation to be undertaken into two separate cases, in connection with which Mr Matsakis is being investigated.
Efter færdiggørelsen af den strafferetlige efterforskning vil retten indlede strafferetlig forfølgning af Matsakis, såfremt beviserne tilsiger dette.
Following completion of the criminal investigation, the Court will initiate criminal proceedings against him if justified by the evidence.
I januar 2004 skød og sårede en politiofficer, der ledede en operation for narkotikapolitiet, en borger, som han havde eftersat.
In January 2004, a police officer, in charge of an operation by the drugs squad, shot and wounded a citizen whom he was pursuing.
Offeret bragtes til hospitalet, hvor han den efterfølgende dag tilkendegav ønske om en samtale med Matsakis, som han udpegede til sin advokat.
The victim was taken to hospital where, on the following day, he asked to be examined by Mr Matsakis, whom he appointed his legal adviser.
Matsakis undersøgte offeret og åstedet samt den bil, som offeret havde kørt, da han blev såret.
Apart from examining the victim, Mr Matsakis examined the scene of the incident and the vehicle which the victim had been driving when he was wounded.
Da denne hændelse vedrørte en borger, der blev såret af en politiofficer i tjeneste, udnævnte justitsministeren en uafhængig strafferetlig efterforsker til at undersøge sagen.
Since this incident involved the wounding of a citizen by a police officer in the performance of his duties, the Attorney General appointed an independent criminal investigator to examine the case.
Sagen mod medlemmet er baseret på politiofficerens beskyldning om, at medlemmet skulle have foreslået at bistå ham i sagen mod en erkendtlighed.
The case against the Member in question is based on an accusation made by the police officer that the Member approached him and offered to assist him in the case against him in exchange for something.
Medlemmet beskyldes således for at have sagt, at han til gengæld for en sum penge ville sikre, at politimanden blev frikendt for strafferetligt ansvar for at have såret Matsakis’ klient.
In particular, the Member allegedly said that in exchange for a sum of money he would ensure that the police officer was absolved of any criminal responsibility for wounding Mr Matsakis' client.
I betragtning af ovenstående har den strafferetlige efterforskning hidtil været koncentreret om at modtage vidneerklæringer fra tredjeparter.
In view of the above, the criminal investigation conducted so far has been confined to taking depositions from third persons.
Medlemmet selv er ikke blevet forhørt og anklagemyndigheden har derfor ikke kendskab til hans version af hændelserne.
The Member himself has not been questioned and the prosecution services do not therefore have his version of events.
For at kunne afslutte efterforskningen, herunder i de erklæringer, som Matsakis eventuelt måtte fremsætte, skal Matsakis’ parlamentariske immunitet først ophæves.
In order to complete the investigation, including the investigation of any statements which Mr Matsakis may make, it is necessary for his parliamentary immunity to be waived.
Hvis politiofficerens beskyldninger kan underbygges, kan Matsakis sigtes for at have overtrådt straffelovens paragraf 123.
If the allegations made by the police officer are borne out, Mr Matsakis could be found guilty of committing a crime under Article 123 of the Code.
Heri hedder det, at den, der anmoder om formue eller tjenester af enhver art på grundlag af en aftale, som led i hvilken han påtager sig at tilbageholde beviser vedrørende udførelsen af en forbrydelse, har gjort sig skyldig i en kriminel strafovertrædelse.
According to that article, whosoever requests property or a benefit of any kind on the basis of an agreement under which he undertakes to withhold any evidence concerning the commission of a crime, is guilty of a criminal offence.
Det er en kriminel forseelse, der straffes med fængsel i op til to år og en bøde på op til C£ 1500.
It is an indictable offence punishable by a term of imprisonment of up to two years and a fine of up to C£1500.
Under efterforskningen af den klage, som den samme politiofficer havde indgivet mod Matsakis (sag 1a.), meddelte denne officer i anden forbindelse, at han under sit besøg i Matsakis’ hus havde set et antal udskårne trækister i garagen, der ”syntes at være gamle eller antikke”.
In the course of the investigation into the complaint brought by the same police officer against Mr Matsakis (case I.a), that officer told the police in passing that during his visit to Mr Matsakis house he had seen a number of carved wooden chests in the garage which ‘seemed to be old or antique’.
Dette gav anledning til mistanke om, at Matsakis handlede ulovligt med antikviteter, og politiet besluttede at undersøge sagen yderligere.
This gave rise to the suspicion that Mr Matsakis might be trafficking in antiquities, and the police decided to investigate the case further .
Af samme grunde som nævnt ovenfor skal medlemmets parlamentariske immunitet ophæves, før efterforskningen kan afsluttes, herunder besigtigelsen af de påståede kister i Matsakis’ hus.
For the same reasons as are set out above, it is necessary to waive the parliamentary immunity of the Member in order to complete the investigation, including the appraisal of the chests which are allegedly in Mr Matsakis’s house.
Den strafferetlige efterforskning har indtil nu været begrænset til at modtage vidneerklæringer fra og efterforske på tredjeparts ejendom.
The criminal investigation conducted so far has been confined to taking depositions from and investigating the premises of third parties.
Parlamentsmedlemmet selv er ikke blevet forhørt, hvilket betyder, at anklagemyndigheden ikke har adgang til hans version af hændelserne.
The Member of Parliament himself has not been questioned; this means that the prosecuting authorities do not have his own version of the events.
Hans hus er heller ikke blevet undersøgt.
Nor has his house been searched.
I henhold til paragraf 33 i straffeloven skal enhver, der ejer antikviteter, registreres i Antikvitetsstyrelsens register.
Pursuant to Article 33 of the Law the possession of antiquities by any person must be registered in special records kept by the Department of Antiquities.
Er dette ikke tilfældet, gør ejerens sig skyldig i en strafferetlig forseelse, der straffes med en bøde på C£ 250 og konfiskation af de pågældende antikviteter.
Failure to do so renders the possessor guilty of a criminal offence punishable by a fine of C£250 and the confiscation of the antiquity or antiquities in question.
Da parlamentsmedlemmet ikke kan forhøres, er det ikke kendt, hvorledes han har erhvervet de pågældende antikviteter.
Given that it is impossible to question the Member of Parliament, the means by which the antiquities were obtained by Mr Matsakis cannot be verified.
Det skal anføres, at i henhold til straffelovens paragraf 26, stk. 7, udgør erhvervelse af antikviteter under overtrædelse af ovennævnte strafferetsparagraf en strafferetlig forseelse, der straffes med fængsel i op til tre år eller en bøde på C£ 1500 eller begge dele.
It should be pointed out that, under Article 26(7) of the Law, the acquisition of antiquities in breach of the above provisions of the Law constitutes a criminal offence punishable by a term of imprisonment of up to three years or a fine of C£1500 or both penalties.
Indsigelserne mod immunitetsophævelsen
The objection raised to the waiver of immunity
I en skrivelse fra Matsakis til Europa-Parlamentets formand, som denne gav meddelelse om på plenarmødet den 14. oktober 2004, gjorde medlemmet indsigelse mod justitsministerens beføjelse til at indgive en sådan anmodning om ophævelse af hans immunitet.
By letter addressed to the President of the European Parliament and announced at the plenary sitting of 14 October 2004, Mr Matsakis challenged the Attorney-General's authority to make such a request for waiver of his immunity.
Matsakis' indsigelse underbygges af tre juridiske argumenter:
Mr Matsakis' objection is supported by three legal opinions.
Han henviser i det væsentlige til ordlyden i forfatningen, hvori det i artikel 83, stk. 2, hedder: ”En repræsentant kan kun efter tilladelse fra Højesteret blive retsforfulgt, arresteret eller fængslet, så længe han fortsat er repræsentant (..).”
He relies essentially on the wording of the Cyprus Constitution, which provides in Article 83(2): "A Representative cannot, without the leave of the High Court, be prosecuted, arrested or imprisoned so long as he continues to be a Representative.(...)".
Derfor burde justitsministeren efter Matsakis’ mening først have indgivet en begæring til Cyperns højesteret.
Consequently, in Mr Matsakis' opinion, the Attorney-General should have first applied to the High Court of Cyprus.
Først når højesteret havde behandlet sagen og givet tilladelse, ville justitsministeren være den kompetente myndighed til at indgive anmodning til Europa-Parlamentet om ophævelse af et parlamentsmedlems immunitet.
Only after the High Court had considered the matter and granted leave, could the Attorney-General become the competent authority to apply to the European Parliament for waiver of his immunity.
Den 13. oktober 2004 og den 10. februar 2005 skrev Republikken Cyperns faste repræsentant til Europa-Parlamentets formand for at bekræfte, at i henhold til den cypriotiske forfatning har justitsministeren kompetence til at indgive en anmodning om ophævelse af et cypriotisk parlamentsmedlems immunitet.
On 13 October 2004 and on 10 February 2005 the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Cyprus wrote to the President of the European Parliament in order to confirm that, under the Cyprus Constitution, the Attorney-General has the authority to make a request for waiver of the immunity of a Cypriot MEP.
Den 7. juni 2005 rettede formanden for Retsudvalget i overensstemmelse med princippet om loyalt samarbejde som anført i EF-traktatens artikel 10 og som afspejlet i artikel 19 i protokollen om privilegier og immuniteter en henvendelse til den cypriotiske højesteret med anmodning om udtalelse om justitsministerens beføjelser på dette område.
On 7 June 2005 the Chairman of the Committee on Legal Affairs, in reliance on the principle of loyal cooperation set out in Article 10 EC and as reflected in Article 19 of the PPI, wrote a letter seeking the opinion of the Supreme Court of Cyprus on the Attorney-General's competence.
Den 16. juni 2005 svarede præsidenten for Cyperns højesteret, at retten ikke var beføjet til at afgive udtalelse om sager, der rettes til den uden for den fremgangsmåde, der er fastsat i forfatningen og dens afledte love og bestemmelser.
On 16 June 2005, the President of the Supreme Court of Cyprus replied that the Supreme Court is not vested with jurisdiction to give legal opinions on matters addressed to it outside the proper procedure envisaged by the constitution, laws and regulations.
For det første skal der i henhold til forretningsordenens artikel 7, stk. 7, tages stilling til, hvorvidt Cyperns justitsminister er beføjet til at indgive anmodning om ophævelse af et cypriotisk parlamentsmedlems immunitet.
First of all, pursuant to Rule 7(7) of the Rules of Procedure, we have to offer an opinion about the competence of the Attorney-General of Cyprus to make a request for waiver of the immunity of a Cypriot MEP.
Generelt er en begæring til Europa-Parlamentet at betragte som gyldig, såfremt den udarbejdes og fremsendes af de myndigheder, som under den relevante nationale lovgivning er beføjede til at indgive og fremsende en tilsvarende begæring til parlamentet i den pågældende medlemsstat.
Generally speaking, a request submitted to the European Parliament is valid where it has been drawn up and forwarded by the authorities which, under the relevant national legislation, are entitled to submit and forward a similar request to the Parliament of the Member State concerned.
Der er ikke i henhold til den cypriotiske forfatnings artikel 83 og 113 tvivl om, at republikkens justitsminister har beføjelse, som han udøver efter eget skøn og i offentlighedens interesse, til at indlede, føre, overtage og fortsætte eller afbryde en retssag for en lovovertrædelse mod enhver person i Cypern.
Under Articles 83 and 113 of the Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus, it is beyond doubt that the Attorney­General of the Republic has the power, exercisable at his discretion in the public interest, to institute, conduct, take over and continue or discontinue any proceedings for an offence against any person in the Republic.
I tilfælde af strafferetlig forfølgning af et parlamentsmedlem skal justitsministeren fremsætte en anmodning om ophævelse af dennes immunitet til den cypriotiske højesteret.
In the case of criminal proceedings brought against an MP he has to make a request for the waiver of his immunity to the High Court.
Dette betyder, at justitsministeren er den kompetente myndighed til at indgive anmodninger om ophævelse af immunitet og at højesteretten har kompetence til at give justitsministeren tilladelse til at retsforfølge et parlamentsmedlem.
That means that the Attorney-General is the competent authority to submit requests for the waiver of immunities and that the High Court has the competence to give the Attorney-General leave to prosecute an MP.