natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Som led i sin undersøgelsesfunktion foretager kontoret kontrol og inspektion i henhold til artikel 9, stk. 1, i forordning (EF, Euratom) nr. 2988/95 og til reglerne for de enkelte sektorer nævnt i artikel 9, stk. 2, i den pågældende forordning, i medlemsstaterne og i tredjelande og internationale organisationer i overensstemmelse med gældende samarbejdsaftaler.
As part of its investigative function, the Office shall carry out the inspections and checks provided for in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 and in the sectoral rules referred to in Article 9(2) of that Regulation in the Member States and, in accordance with the cooperation agreements in force, in third countries and in international organisations .
For at fastslå, om der foreligger svig, bestikkelse eller anden ulovlig aktivitet som omhandlet i artikel 1 i forbindelse med en støtteaftale, en støtteafgørelse eller en kontrakt om fællesskabsfinansiering, kan kontoret efter bestemmelserne i forordning (Euratom, EU) nr. 2185/96 foretage kontrol på stedet hos erhvervsvirksomheder, der er berørt af en sådan finansiering.
With a view to establishing that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1 in connection with a grant agreement or decision or a contract concerning Community funding, the Office may, in accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, conduct on‑the‑spot checks and inspections on economic operators concerned by such funding.
For at fastslå, om der foreligger svig, bestikkelse eller anden ulovlig aktivitet som omhandlet i artikel 1 i forbindelse med en støtteaftale, en støtteafgørelse eller en kontrakt om fællesskabsfinansiering, kan kontoret efter bestemmelserne i forordning (Euratom, EU) nr. 2185/96 foretage kontrol på stedet hos erhvervsvirksomheder, der direkte eller indirekte er berørt af en sådan finansiering.
With a view to establishing that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1 in connection with a grant agreement or decision or a contract concerning Community funding, the Office may, in accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, conduct on‑the‑spot checks and inspections on economic operators concerned directly or indirectly by such funding.
Compte tenu du fait que les modalités d’enquête prévues par le règlement en objet reprennent celles prévues par le règlement (CE) n° 2185/96, il convient de prévoir pour le règlement (CE) no. 1073/99 le même champ d'application du règlement (CE) no. 2185/96 en ce qui concerne les opérateurs économiques, et ceci afin d’améliorer l’efficacité des enquêtes de l’OLAF.
As the methods of investigation provided for by the Regulation in question coincide with those previously provided for by Regulation (EC) No 2185/96, it is desirable to define the same scope for Regulation (EC) No 1073/99 as for Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 as regards economic operators, in order to improve the effectiveness of OLAF's investigations.
Artikel 3 – stk. 2 – afsnit 1 a (nyt)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Medlemsstaterne vedtager og gennemfører alle nødvendige foranstaltninger for at sikre, at kontoret udøver den undersøgelsesfunktion, der er nævnt i denne artikel.
The Member States shall adopt and implement all the measures required in order to ensure that the Office performs the investigative function referred to in this Article.
De tilbyder kontoret deres støtte i forbindelse med kontrol og inspektion på stedet efter bestemmelserne i forordning (Euratom, E F ) nr. 2185/96 hos erhvervs drivende , der direkte eller indirekte er berørt af en fællesskabsfinansiering.
They shall offer their support to the Office in connection with on-the-spot inspections and checks carried out in accordance with the rules laid down in Regulation (Euratom , EC ) No 2185/96 on economic operators concerned directly or indirectly by Community funding.
Il est nécessaire de rappeler, dans le cadre de ce règlement, les obligations à charge des autorités compétentes des Etats membres, de collaborer avec l’OLAF dans la phase préliminaire à l’ouverture d’une enquête, selon les modalités prévues par le règlement (CE, Euratom) n° 2185/96.
It is necessary to recall, in this Regulation, the obligations incumbent on the competent authorities of the Member States to cooperate with OLAF during the stage preliminary to the opening of an investigation in accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2185/96.
Under en ekstern undersøgelse kan kontoret i det omfang, det er strengt nødvendigt for at kunne fastslå, om der foreligger svig, bestikkelse eller anden ulovlig aktivitet som omhandlet i artikel 1, få adgang til de relevante oplysninger, som institutioner, organer, kontorer eller agenturer er i besiddelse af vedrørende de forhold, der er genstand for undersøgelsen.
During an external investigation and where strictly necessary in order to establish that fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1 has occurred, the Office may have access to any relevant information held by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies connected with the matter under investigation.
Artikel 4, stk. 2 og 4, finder herved anvendelse.
Article 4(2) and (4) shall apply for that purpose.
Under en ekstern undersøgelse kan kontoret i det omfang, det er nødvendigt for at kunne fastslå, om der foreligger svig, bestikkelse eller anden ulovlig aktivitet som omhandlet i artikel 1, få adgang til de relevante oplysninger, som institutioner, organer, kontorer eller agenturer er i besiddelse af vedrørende de forhold, der er genstand for undersøgelsen.
During an external investigation and where necessary in order to establish that fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1 has occurred, the Office may have access to any relevant information held by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies connected with the matter under investigation.
Il convient de faciliter le travail d’enquête de l’OLAF quant à l’accès aux informations détenues par les institutions.
It is desirable to facilitate the investigations of OLAF in respect of access to information held by the institutions.
Artikel 3 – stk. 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Når kontoret, inden der indledes en undersøgelse, råder over oplysninger, der giver anledning til formodning om, at der foreligger svig, bestikkelse eller anden ulovlig aktivitet som nævnt i artikel 1, kan kontorets generaldirektør underrette de kompetente myndigheder i de berørte medlemsstater herom, og disse foretager, uden at det berører reglerne for de enkelte sektorer, en passende opfølgning og foranstalter eventuelt undersøgelser i overensstemmelse med gældende national ret, hvori kontorets ansatte kan deltage.
Where the Office has to hand, prior to an investigation, information which suggests that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1, the Director General of the Office may inform the competent authorities of the Member States concerned and, without prejudice to the sectoral rules, those authorities shall ensure that appropriate action is taken and, where necessary, undertake investigations in accordance with national law, in which staff of the Office may take part.
De kompetente myndigheder i de berørte medlemsstater underretter kontorets generaldirektør om de resultater, der er opnået på grundlag af disse oplysninger.”
The competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall inform the Director‑General of the Office of their findings on the basis of such information.
Når kontoret, inden der indledes en undersøgelse, råder over oplysninger, der giver anledning til formodning om, at der foreligger svig, bestikkelse eller anden ulovlig aktivitet som nævnt i artikel 1, underretter kontorets generaldirektør de kompetente myndigheder i de berørte medlemsstater herom, og disse foretager, uden at det berører reglerne for de enkelte sektorer, en passende opfølgning og foranstalter eventuelt undersøgelser i overensstemmelse med gældende national ret, hvori kontorets ansatte kan deltage.
Where the Office has to hand, prior to an investigation, information which suggests that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1, the Director General of the Office inform s the competent authorities of the Member States concerned and, without prejudice to the sectoral rules, those authorities shall ensure that appropriate action is taken and, where necessary, undertake investigations in accordance with national law, in which staff of the Office may take part.
De kompetente myndigheder i de berørte medlemsstater underretter kontorets generaldirektør om de foranstaltninger, der er truffet, og de resultater, der er opnået på grundlag af disse oplysninger.”
The competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall inform the Director‑General of the Office of the action taken and of their findings on the basis of such information.
Il convient de prévoir que les autorités compétentes des Etats membres informent le directeur général de l’Office aussi des mesures prises à la suite de la transmission d’information par l’OLAF avant l’ouverture d’une enquête
It is desirable to stipulate that the competent authorities of the Member States are also to inform the Director General of OLAF of measures taken in response to the forwarding of information from OLAF before the opening of an investigation.
Når kontoret beslutter ikke at indlede en undersøgelse, underretter det Eurojust om fremsendelse til medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder af oplysninger, der giver anledning til formodning om, at der foreligger svig, bestikkelse eller anden ulovlig aktivitet som nævnt i artikel 1, der udgør alvorlig kriminalitet og vedrører mindst to medlemsstater.
When the Office decides not to open an investigation it shall inform Eurojust that it has forwarded to the competent authorities in the Member States elements of information giving grounds for suspecting the existence of fraud, an act of corruption or any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1, in the form of serious crime involving two or more Member States.
Kontoret underretter ligeledes Eurojust, hvis en af kontorets undersøgelser sorterer under dens myndighed i henhold til bestemmelserne i samarbejdsaftalerne mellem de to organer.
Eurojust shall also be notified by the Office as soon as an Office investigation comes within its competence, in accordance with the procedures laid down in the cooperation agreements concluded between them.
Il convient de prévoir un échange d’information systématique entre OLAF et Eurojust chaque fois qu’une autorité compétente nationale reçoit par l’OLAF des informations relatives à des soupçons de fraude, corruption ou autre activité visée à l’article 1er du présent règlement, et qui relèvent de formes graves de criminalité, impliquant deux Etats membres ou plus.
It is desirable to provide for the systematic exchange of information between OLAF and Eurojust whenever a competent national authority receives from OLAF information on suspicions of fraud, corruption any other illegal activity referred to in Article 1, in the form of serious crime involving two or more Member States.
Cette mesure améliore la coordination, portant sur des faits de fraude grave transnationale, entre l’OLAF et Eurojust.
This measure will improve coordination between OLAF and Eurojust on cases of serious transnational fraud.
Artikel 1 – nr. 1 a (nyt)
Article 1 - point 1 a
1a) Der indsættes følgende artikel 3a:
(1a) The following article is inserted:
"Artikel 3a
"Article 3a
Kontorets samarbejde med Eurojust, Europol og andre internationale organisationer
Cooperation on the part of the Office with Eurojust, Europol and other international organisations
Kontoret kan under udøvelsen af de beføjelser, det er tillagt ved denne forordning, indgå samarbejdsaftaler med Eurojust, Europol og andre internationale organisationer.
Pursuant to the powers and responsibilities conferred upon it under this Regulation, the Office may conclude cooperation agreements with Eurojust and Europol.
Formålet med disse aftaler er at klarlægge disse organisationers respektive beføjelser og deres samarbejde som led i område t med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed.
The aim of these agreements shall be to clarify the respective powers and responsibilities of these bodies and to define the cooperation between them within the framework of the area of freedom, of security and of justice.
Kontoret kan også indgå samarbejdsaftaler med andre internationale organisationer."
The Office may also conclude cooperation agreements with other international organisations."
Artikel 1 – nr. 2, litra -a (nyt)
Article 1 – point 2 -a (new)
Artikel 4 – stk. 1 – afsnit 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
"De interne undersøgelser foretages under overholdelse af bestemmelserne i traktaterne, særlig protokollen vedrørende De Europæiske Fællesskabers privilegier og immuniteter, under overholdelse af vedtægten og på de betingelser og særlige vilkår, der er fastsat i nærværende forordning og i beslutninger, som hver enkel institution, organ, kontor og agentur vedtager , uden at dette fører til forskelsbehandling, for så vidt angår de processuelle garantier og de pågældende personers legitime rettigheder, i forhold til eksterne undersøgelser ."
" These internal investigations shall be carried out subject to the rules of the Treaties, in particular the Protocol on privileges and immunities of the European Communities, and with due regard for the Staff Regulations under the conditions and in accordance with the procedures provided for in this Regulation and in decisions adopted by each institution, body, office and agency ; from the point of view of procedural guarantees and the legitimate rights of the persons concerned there must be no difference in treatment by comparison with external investigations. " .
Il est bien de souligner que les personnes soumises aux enquêtes de l’OLAF doivent avoir un traitement égal, sur le plan des garanties de procédure et des droits légitimes, indépendamment du fait qu’il s’agit d’une enquête interne ou externe.
It is worth stressing that people who are under investigation by OLAF should be treated equally as regards procedural guarantees and legitimate rights, irrespective of whether the investigation is internal or external.
Artikel 1 ‑ nr. 2, litra a
Article 1 – point 2 a
Efter bestemmelserne i forordning (Euratom, EF) nr. 2185/96 kan kontoret foretage kontrol på stedet hos erhvervsdrivende for at få adgang til oplysninger af relevans for de forhold, som er genstand for den interne undersøgelse.”
In accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, the Office may carry out on‑the‑spot inspections at the premises of economic operators in order to obtain access to information relevant to the matter under internal investigation.
Efter bestemmelserne i forordning (Euratom, EF) nr. 2185/96 kan kontoret foretage kontrol på stedet hos erhvervsdrivende , der er berørt direkte eller indirekte , for at få adgang til oplysninger af relevans for de forhold, som er genstand for den interne undersøgelse.”
In accordance with the procedures laid down by Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, the Office may carry out on‑the‑spot inspections at the premises of economic operators who are directly or indirectly concerned in order to obtain access to information relevant to the matter under internal investigation.
Compte tenu du fait que les modalités d’enquête prévues par le règlement en objet reprennent celles prévues par le règlement (CE) n° 2185/96, il convient de prévoir pour le règlement (CE) no. 1073/99 le même champ d'application du règlement (CE) no. 2185/96, en ce qui concerne les opérateurs économiques, et ceci afin d’améliorer l’efficacité des enquêtes de l’Office.
As the methods of investigation provided for by the Regulation in question coincide with those previously provided for by Regulation (EC) No 2185/96, it is desirable to define the same scope for Regulation (EC) No 1073/99 as for Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 as regards economic operators, in order to improve the effectiveness of OLAF's investigations.
Kontoret kan indlede en undersøgelse, når der er en tilstrækkeligt begrundet mistanke om, at der er begået svig, bestikkelse eller andre ulovlige handlinger som nævnt i artikel 1.
The Office may open an investigation when sufficiently strong suspicions exist that acts of fraud or corruption or other illegal acts referred to in Article 1 have been committed.
Når der træffes beslutning om, hvorvidt der skal indledes en undersøgelse, skal der tages hensyn til, hvad der prioriteres i kontorets politik på undersøgelsesområdet og dets arbejdsprogram for undersøgelser som fastsat i henhold til artikel 11a og artikel 12, stk. 5.
The decision whether or not to open an investigation shall take account of the investigation policy priorities and the Office’s programme of investigative activities determined in accordance with Articles 11a and 12(5).
Ved denne beslutning skal der ligeledes tages hensyn til, at kontorets ressourcer skal anvendes effektivt, og at de midler, der sættes ind, skal stå i et rimeligt forhold til formålet.
That decision shall also take account of the need for efficient utilisation of the Office’s resources and for proportionality in the means deployed.
Anonyme anmeldelser vil også blive behandlet, hvis mistanken er tilstrækkeligt begrundet.
Anonymous information may also be taken into account if it constitutes sufficiently strong grounds for suspicion.
Le principe d'efficience est applicable à la gestion budgétaire même.
The principle of efficiency is applicable to budgetary management itself.
Il ne convient pas de l'appliquer à la décision sur l'ouverture d'enquête, afin d'éviter à tout prix une situation où l'Office doit renoncer à une enquête faute de ressources pour l'effectuer.
It is not desirable to apply it to the decision on the opening of an investigation, in order to avoid at all costs a situation in which OLAF would have to refrain from carrying out an investigation for lack of resources with which to conduct it.
Cet ajout permet de préciser qu'une enquête peut également être ouverte suite à une plainte anonyme.
This insertion makes it possible to indicate that an investigation may also be opened in response to an anonymous complaint.
Si l'on veut lutter de manière efficace contre la fraude et la corruption, l'anonymat ne peut être un motif d'exclusion au risque que les plaintes ne soient pas déposées de crainte que l'identité du plaignant soit divulguée.
If fraud and corruption are to be tackled effectively, the fact that information has been received from an anonymous source should not be grounds for ruling out an investigation: otherwise there would be a risk that complaints would not be made for fear that the identity of the complainant might be disclosed.
Artikel 5 – stk. 1 a (nyt)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Undersøgelser indledes på grundlag af en beslutning truffet af kontorets generaldirektør efter høring af kontorets eksekutivkomité og i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i artikel 14, stk. 2, om prøvelse af lovligheden.
The decision to open an investigation shall be taken by the Direc tor Gen eral of the Office after consulting the Office's executive board and in accordance with the provisions concerning checks on legality which are laid down in Article 14(2 ) .
La décision finale d’ouvrir ou non une enquête est prise par le directeur général, après consultation du comité exécutif de l’Office, selon la procédure détaillée dans le code de procédure.
The final decision as to whether or not to open an investigation is taken by the Director General after consultation with the executive board of OLAF, in accordance with the detailed procedure stipulated in the procedural code.
Dans la pratique actuelle de l’Office, le comité exécutif donne un avis au directeur général, au moment de l’ouverture d’une enquête.
OLAF's current practice is for the executive board to deliver an opinion to the Director General when an investigation is opened.
Artikel 5 – stk. 2 – afsnit 1
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Eksterne undersøgelser indledes på grundlag af en beslutning truffet af kontorets generaldirektør, som handler på eget initiativ eller efter anmodning fra en berørt medlemsstat eller fra Kommissionen .
The decision to open an external investigation shall be taken by the Director‑General of the Office, acting on his own initiative or following a request from a Member State concerned or the Commission .
Eksterne undersøgelser indledes på grundlag af en beslutning truffet af kontorets generaldirektør, som handler på eget initiativ eller efter anmodning fra en berørt medlemsstat eller fra De Europæiske Fællesskabers og Den Europæiske Unions institutioner .
The decision to open an external investigation shall be taken by the Director‑General of the Office, acting on his own initiative or following a request from a Member State concerned or one of the institutions of the European Communities or of the European Union .
Il convient de donner aux institutions aussi la possibilité de demander au directeur général de l’OLAF d’ouvrir une enquête.
The institutions should also be given the power to ask the Director General of OLAF to open an investigation.
Artikel 5 – stk. 4 – afsnit 3 (nyt)
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Inden indledningen af og under en undersøgelse giver de forskellige institutioner, organer, kontorer eller agenturer kontoret øjeblikkelig og automatisk adgang til databaser for forvaltning af fællesskabsmidler og til alle andre relevante databaser og oplysninger, så kontoret kan fastslå, om de oplysninger, der fremsendes, er pålidelige.
Prior to the opening and throughout the duration of an investigation, the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall provide the Office with immediate and automatic access to databases concerned with the management of Community funds and to any other base containing relevant data and information which will enable the Office to check that the information forwarded is accurate.
Il est utile d’insérer une base juridique permettant à l’OLAF d’accéder de façon immédiate et automatique aux bases de données et à toute autre information pertinente dans la phase d’évaluation préliminaire de l’information.
It is desirable to insert a legal basis to make it possible for OLAF to gain immediate and automatic access to databases and any other relevant information during the stage when the information is undergoing preliminary assessment.
Le bien-fondé des informations transmises est rapidement vérifié et l’efficacité d’une enquête, si ouverte par la suite, améliorée.
The accuracy of the information forwarded is verified rapidly and if an investigation is subsequently opened its effectiveness is improved.
Artikel 1 ‑ nr. 4 a
Article 1 – point 4 a
a) I stk. 1 ændres ordet ”direktør” til ”generaldirektør”, og i stk. 3 ændres ordet ”direktøren” til ”generaldirektøren”.
(a) in paragraphs 1 and 3, “the Director” is replaced by “the Director ‑General”;
Kontorets generaldirektør leder gennemførelsen af undersøgelserne.
The Direc tor Gen eral of the Office shall direct the conduct of investigations.
Han kan skriftligt bemyndige en af kontorets administrerende direktører til at lede gennemførelsen af undersøgelserne.
He may issue written instructions to an operational Director of the Office to direct the conduct of investigations.
Undersøgelserne gennemføres af ansatte udpeget af kontoret under kontorets generaldirektørs myndighed og ansvar."
Investigations shall be conducted under the authority and the responsibility of the Direc tor Gen eral of the Office by agents nominated by the Office. " .
Il est utile de prévoir clairement, pour le directeur général, la compétence d’habiliter un directeur de l’Office à diriger des enquêtes, comme il est prévu dans le Manuel de l’OLAF.
It is desirable to stipulate clearly that the Director General has the power to instruct a Director of OLAF to conduct investigations, as provided for in the OLAF Manual.