natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Håndhævelsen bør derfor udelukkende gælde alvorlige overtrædelser.
Enforcement should therefore concentrate on serious infringements only.
Med henblik på at skabe lige vilkår for transportvirksomheder fra alle lande bør medlemsstaterne nå til enighed om (de forskellige) definitioner på "alvorlige overtrædelser", før denne omarbejdede forordning træder i kraft.
In order to create a level playing field for bus and coach operators from all countries, Member States have to agree upon the (individual) definitions of ’serious infringements’ before this ’recast’ enters into force.
Adgangen til markedet for buskørsel er for tiden reguleret ved forordning (EØF) nr. 684/92 og (EF) nr. 12/98.
Access to the market for coach and bus services is at present governed by regulations (EEC) No 684/92 and (EC) No 12/98.
Hvad angår transport med bus, sondres der mellem to kategorier: Lejlighedsvis kørsel og rutekørsel.
For the purposes of coach and bus transport, a distinction is made between two types of carriage, namely occasional services and regular services.
For ovennævnte forordningers vedkommende er den lejlighedsvise internationale befordring allerede liberaliseret.
The above two regulations have already liberalised international carriage where occasional services are concerned.
For international rutekørsel skal transportvirksomheden anmode om en tilladelse fra de medlemsstater, denne befordring passerer.
As regards international regular services, carriers must seek authorisation from Member States whose territory is crossed by such services.
Det er endvidere muligt at foretage cabotagekørsel som led i den internationale rutekørsel.
Cabotage operations may, moreover, be carried out when providing international regular services.
Formålet med Kommissionens forslag er at forenkle den lovgivningsmæssige ramme.
The aim of the Commission proposal is to simplify the legislative framework.
Forordningen om offentlig serviceforpligtelse i forbindelse med personbefordring med jernbane og ad landevej er blevet vedtaget, og der skal tages højde for denne i forbindelse med tilladelsesproceduren for rutekørsel.
The regulation laying down the public service obligations applicable to road and rail transport has been adopted and must be taken into consideration in the authorisation procedure for regular services.
Endvidere ønsker Kommissionen at styrke samarbejdet mellem medlemsstaterne og harmonisere dokumentformaterne for at lette kontrollen.
In addition, the Commission is seeking to strengthen cooperation among Member States and harmonise document formats so as to make for easier checking.
Man kan kun glæde sig over den forenkling af den lovgivningsmæssige ramme, der er resultatet af samlingen af de to forordninger til en enkelt.
The two regulations have been combined to form a single text, and the resulting simplification of the legislative framework is to be welcomed.
Hvad angår denne forordnings anvendelsesområde , skal det præciseres, at den ikke omfatter "nationale" tilladelser, medlemsstaterne udsteder til virksomheder, der udelukkende beskæftiger sig med nationale tjenester.
One point to be made about scope is that the regulation does not apply to the ‘national’ licences that Member States issue to carriers performing national services only.
Hvad angår tilladelsesproceduren for international rutekørsel, er forenklingerne generelt blevet vel modtaget af sektoren.
As regards the procedure for authorising international regular services, the sector is broadly in favour of the simplifications.
Medlemsstaterne kan kun nægte at give tilladelse i specifikke tilfælde, navnlig når en rutekørsel i alvorlig grad truer en offentlig tjenesteydelseskontrakt.
Member States may not refuse authorisation other than in very specific cases, for instance when a regular service would seriously affect the viability of a service operated under a public service contract.
Myndighederne i medlemsstater, hvis territorium kun passeres uden optagning eller afsætning af rejsende, underrettes blot, når de medlemsstater, der berøres af denne tjeneste, har givet deres tilladelse.
The authorities of Member States whose territory is merely crossed in transit, but where no passengers are picked up or set down, will simply be informed once the Member States concerned have agreed to authorise the service in question.
For at sikre en smidig procedure skal fristerne for de kompetente myndigheders udstedelse og afvisning af tilladelse reduceres, i lighed med Kommissionens frist for at træffe afgørelse i de tilfælde, hvor den har modtaget en klage over en afvisning af at give tilladelse.
To enable the procedure to run smoothly, it would be desirable to shorten the time allowed for Member States’ authorities to grant or refuse authorisation; and, when a case has been referred to it after authorisation has been refused, the Commission should likewise be required to reach a decision within a shorter deadline.
I betragtning 11 i forordningsforslaget anføres det, at direktivet om udstationering af arbejdstagere finder anvendelse for speciel rutekørsel.
Recital 10 of the proposal for a regulation states that the directive on the posting of workers applies to special regular services.
Denne bestemmelse skal også fremgå af den tilsvarende artikel.
That provision should be included in the appropriate article.
Hvad angår samarbejdet mellem medlemsstaterne foreslår ordføreren samme principper og samme ændringer som for forordningen om adgang til markedet for international vejgodstransport.
Regarding cooperation among Member States , the principles and changes that the rapporteur is proposing here are the same as those being put forward in connection with the regulation on access to the market for the international carriage of goods by road.
Hvad angår harmoniseringen af kontroldokumenter , støtter ordføreren bestemmelserne i forslaget, herunder navnlig anvendelsen af komitologiproceduren med kontrol.
As regards the harmonisation of control documents , the rapporteur endorses the provisions set out in the proposal and especially the application of the comitology procedure with scrutiny by Parliament.
BILAG 1: SKRIVELSE FRA RETSUDVALGET
ANNEX 1: LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS
BILAG 2: SKRIVELSE FRA DE JURIDISKE TJENESTERS RÅDGIVENDE GRUPPE
ANNEX 2: OPINION IN LETTER FORM OF THE LEGAL SERVICES' CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY
TIL EUROPA-PARLAMENTET
FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
I henhold til den interinstitutionelle aftale af 28. november 2001 om en mere systematisk omarbejdning af retsakter, særlig punkt 9, behandlede den rådgivende gruppe bestående af de juridiske tjenester i Europa-Parlamentet, Rådet og Kommissionen på møder den 30. maj og den 11. juni 2007 ovennævnte forslag fra Kommissionen.
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party, consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, met on 30 May 2007 and on 11 June 2007 for the purpose of examining the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Under behandlingen
At those meetings
Den rådgivende gruppe havde alle sprogudgaver til rådighed og benyttede den engelske originaludgave af arbejdsdokumentet som grundlag for behandlingen. af forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning om omarbejdning af Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 684/92 af 16. marts 1992 om fælles regler for international personbefordring med bus og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 12/98 af 11. december 1997 om betingelserne for transportvirksomheders adgang til at udføre personbefordring ad vej i en medlemsstat, hvor de ikke er hjemmehørende, konstaterede den rådgivende gruppe følgende:
The Consultative Working Party had all language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Council Regulation (EEC) 684/92 of 16 March 1992 on common rules for the international carriage of passengers by coach and bus and Council Regulation (EC) No 12/98 of 11 December 1997 laying down the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate national road passenger transport services within a Member State resulted in the Consultative Working Party's establishing, by common accord, as follows:
1) (Denne ændring vedrører ikke den danske udgave)
Incidentally, it should be pointed out that on 1 June 2007 a new document bearing a reference number COM(2007) 264 final/2 was officially transmitted to the European Parliament and to the Council; on the cover page of that new document a corrigendum appears, which reads "Annule et remplace la page de couverture du document COM(2007)264 final .du 23.5.2007 / Cette correction concerne les versions EN,FR,DE".
2) Følgende dele af teksten til det omarbejdede forslag burde have været markeret med grå baggrund, der anvendes til at gøre opmærksom på indholdsmæssige ændringer:
2) The following parts of text of the recast proposal should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type used for marking substantive changes:
hele ordlyden af artikel 2, nr. 3.4, 2. punktum, i forordning nr. 684/92, som forekommer to gange i det omarbejdede forslag, og som allerede er markeret med dobbelt gennemstregning, én gang mellem litra c) og d) i artikel 2, og én gang mellem afsnit 4 og 5 i artikel 5, stk. 3;
the entire text of the second subparagraph of point (3.4) of Article 2 of Regulation 684/92, appearing twice in the text of the recast proposal already marked with double strikethrough, once between the texts of points (c) and (d) of Article 2 and once between the fourth and fifth subparagraphs of Article 5(3);
hele ordlyden af artikel 3a, stk. 5, i forordning nr. 684/92, som allerede er markeret med dobbelt gennemstregning, og som i det omarbejdede forslag figurerer umiddelbart efter artikel 4, stk. 4;
the entire text of Article 3a(5) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing immediately after Article 4(4) in the text of the recast proposal;
hele ordlyden af artikel 13, stk. 3, afsnit 2, i forordning nr. 684/92, som allerede er markeret med dobbelt gennemstregning, og som i det omarbejdede forslag figurerer i artikel 5, stk. 5;
the entire text of the second subparagraph of Article 13(3) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing in the text of Article 5(5) in the recast proposal;
hele ordlyden af artikel 5, stk. 4, i forordning nr. 684/92, som allerede er markeret med dobbelt gennemstregning, og som i det omarbejdede forslag figurerer mellem stk. 3 og 4 i artikel 6;
the entire text of Article 5(4) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 6 in the recast proposal;
hele ordlyden af artikel 6, stk. 2, i forordning nr. 684/92, som allerede er markeret med dobbelt gennemstregning, og som i det omarbejdede forslag figurerer mellem stk. 1 og 2 i artikel 7;
the entire text of Article 6(2) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 7 in the recast proposal;
(ændringen af artikel 8, stk. 8, vedrører ikke den danske udgave)
in Article 8(8), the word "within" (already marked with double strikethrough) and the word "after";
hele ordlyden af artikel 11, stk. 5, i forordning nr. 684/92, som allerede er markeret med dobbelt gennemstregning, og som i det omarbejdede forslag figurerer mellem stk. 6 og 7 i artikel 12;
the entire text of Article 11(5) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of paragraphs 6 and 7 of Article 12 in the recast proposal;
den oprindelige ordlyd af artikel 6, stk. 2, indledningen, i forordning nr. 12/98, der i det omarbejdede forslag figurerer som slettet tekst markeret med dobbelt gennemstregning før de indledende ord i artikel 17, stk. 2;
the initial wording of Article 6(2), introductory words, of Regulation 12/98, appearing as a deleted text, marked with double strikethrough, before the introductory words of Article 17(2) in the recast proposal;
andet punktum i artikel 6, stk. 3, i forordning nr. 12/98, der i det omarbejdede forslag figurerer som slettet tekst markeret med dobbelt gennemstregning i slutningen af artikel 17, stk. 3;
the second sentence of Article 6(3) of Regulation 12/98, appearing as a deleted text, marked with double strikethrough, after the text of Article 17(3) in the recast proposal;
i artikel 16, stk. 1, litra a), ordet "priser";
in Article 16(l)(a), the word "rates";
i artikel 18, stk. 1, ordene "Passagerer, som benytter" og "under hele turen medføre" (som allerede er markeret med dobbelt gennemstregning), og " Transportvirksomheder, som udfører " og "udstede" (som er vist mellem tilpasningspile);
in Article 18(1), introductory words, the wordings "Passengers using" and "throughout their journey possess" (all having been already marked with double strikethrough), and "Carriers operating" and "issue" (all presented between adaptation arrows);
i artikel 22, stk. 1, litra a), ordet "varig" (allerede markeret med tilpasningspile);
in Article 22(l)(a), the word "permanent" (already marked with adaptation arrows);
i artikel 22, stk. 1, litra b), ordet "tidsbegrænset" (allerede indeholdt i en tekstdel, der er markeret med tilpasningspile).
in Article 22(l)(b), the word "temporary" (already included in a part of text marked with adaptation arrows).
3) De slettede dele af Afdeling IV i forordning nr. 684/92, som figurerer umiddelbart efter den nye artikel 13 i det omarbejdede forslag, og af artikel 16, stk. 5, i samme forordning, der står umiddelbart efter den nye artikel 20, burde ikke have figureret i det omarbejdede forslag.
3) The deleted texts of Section IV of Regulation 684/92 appearing immediately after new Article 13 in the recast proposal and of Article 16(5) of the same regulation appearing immediately after new Article 20 should have not appeared in the recast proposal.
4) Der blev konstateret en vis uoverensstemmelse mellem ordlyden af bilag I, punkt 5, litra c) og artikel 22, stk. 1, eftersom det pågældende punkt i bilaget synes at gengive indholdet af indledningen og litra a) i artikel 22, stk. 1, uden at medtage litra b).
4) It was acknowledged that a certain inconsistency would appear to exist between the text of point 5(c) of Annex I and that of Article 22(1), in that the said point appears to quote the contents of the introductory wording and of point (a) of Article 22(1) without mentioning its point (b).
5) Det konstateredes endvidere, at sammenligningstabellen i bilag II ikke var korrekt, og at den følgelig måtte suppleres og rettes efter behov.
5) It was also acknowledged that the correlation table in Annex II is not accurate, and would therefore need to be completed and corrected where necessary.
Efter behandlingen konstaterede den rådgivende gruppe, at forslaget ikke indeholder andre indholdsmæssige ændringer end dem, der er identificeret som sådanne i forslaget eller i nærværende udtalelse.
In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such therein or in the present opinion.
Den rådgivende gruppe konkluderede endvidere, for så vidt angår kodifikation af de uændrede bestemmelser i de tidligere retsakter, at forslaget rent faktisk udelukkende består i en kodifikation af de eksisterende retsakter uden nogen indholdsmæssige ændringer.
The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those substantive amendments, that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
International personbefordring med bus (omarbejdning)
International carriage of passengers by coach and bus (recast)
om forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning om fælles regler for adgang til markedet for international godskørsel
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (recast)
(Omarbejdning – forretningsordenens artikel 80 a)
(Recast – Rule 80a of the Rules of Procedure)
FORSLAG TIL EUROPA-PARLAMENTETS LOVGIVNINGSMÆSSIGE BESLUTNING.....5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION............................5
BILAG 1: SKRIVELSE FRA RETSUDVALGET......................................................................23
ANNEX 1: LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS.............................23
BILAG 2: SKRIVELSE FRA DE JURIDISKE TJENESTERS RÅDGIVENDE GRUPPE.........25
ANNEX 2: OPINION IN LETTER FORM OF THE LEGAL SERVICES' CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY 25
– der henviser til Kommissionens forslag til Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet ( KOM(2007)0265 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0265 ),
– der henviser til EF-traktatens artikel 251, stk. 2, og artikel 71, på grundlag af hvilke Kommissionen har forelagt forslaget ( C6‑0146/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 71 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0146/2007 ),
– der henviser til den interinstitutionelle aftale af 28. november 2001 om en mere systematisk omarbejdning af retsakter
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts
– der henviser til skrivelse fra Retsudvalget af 20. november 2007 i overensstemmelse med forretningsordenens artikel 80 a, stk. 3,
– having regard to the letter of 20 November 2007 from the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 80a(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– der henviser til betænkning fra Transport- og Turismeudvalget ( A6–0038/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0038/2008 ),
(4a) Indgående eller udgående vejgodstransport som en del af en kombineret godskørsel falder ind under bestemmelserne i Rådets direktiv 92/106/EØF om indførelse af fælles regler for visse former for kombineret godstransport mellem medlemsstaterne 1 , og derfor falder kombineret jernbane/vejtransport og/eller vand/vejtransport i begge retninger ikke ind under definitionen på cabotage.
(4a) The incoming or outgoing car ria ge of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey under the conditions laid down in Council Directive 92/106/EEC of 7 December 1992 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States 1 , and therefore combined rail/road transport and/or water/road transport in both directions, does not fall under the definition of cabotage.
Den aktuelle praksis i visse medlemsstater er ikke i overensstemmelse med dette, men det hverken kan eller må være hensigten.
Current practices in certain Member States do not adhere to this trend, but that cannot and must not be the intention.
(9) Der bør også udfærdiges en førerattest, så medlemsstaterne kan kontrollere, om førere fra tredjelande er lovligt beskæftiget af eller stillet til rådighed for den transportvirksomhed, der er ansvarlig for en given transport.
(9) A driver attestation should also be established, in order to allow Member States to check effectively whether drivers from third countries are lawfully employed or at the disposal of the haulier responsible for a given transport operation.
Denne førerattest bør være forståelig for enhver, der udfører sådanne kontroller.
This driver attestation should be comprehensible to any person who carries out such checks.
(11) Tidligere blev der givet en tidsbegrænset tilladelse til sådanne nationale transporter.
(11) In the past, such national transport services were authorised on a temporary basis.
I praksis har det været vanskeligt at afgøre, hvilke transporter der var tilladt.
In practice, it has been difficult to ascertain which services are authorised.
Der er derfor brug for klare regler, der er lette at håndhæve.
Clear and easily enforceable rules are thus needed.
På lang sigt kan begrænsningerne i cabotage imidlertid ikke længere forsvares.
In the longer term, however, the restrictions on cabotage are no longer justifiable.
De bør fuldstændig afskaffes, da disse begrænsninger ikke er i overensstemmelse med principperne for et indre marked uden grænser, hvor den frie bevægelighed for varer og tjenester er garanteret.
They must be completely abolished, as these restrictions do not accord with the principles of an internal market without borders where the freemovement of goods and services is guaranteed.
Medlemsstaterne bør træffe alle de nødvendige foranstaltninger for at sikre, at bestemmelserne finder anvendelse på ensartet vis i hele EU.
The Member States should take all the necessary measures to ensure that the rules are enforced uniformly throughout the EU.
Den frie bevægelighed for tjenester og en fælles transportpolitik var allerede omfattet af traktaterne fra 1957.
Free movement of services and a common transport policy were already provided for in the Treaties of 1957.
I 1985 anlagde EP et passivitetssøgsmål mod Rådet ved Domstolen, fordi Rådet ikke havde udformet en fælles transportpolitik.
In 1985 the EP brought proceedings against the Council before the Court of Justice because of its failure to act and formulate a common transport policy.
Fra et miljømæssigt synspunkt bør vi sikre, at vejgodstransporten bliver så effektiv som muligt og begrænse antallet af kørsler uden last til et absolut minimum.
From the environmental point of view we should ensure that road haulage is as efficient as possible and limit the number of unladen journeys to the absolute minimum.
(12a) Begrænsningerne med hensyn til antallet af og tidsrummet for udførelse af cabotagekørsler er en nødvendig, men midlertidig foranstaltning, som skal tilskynde medlemsstaterne til at harmonisere beskatnings- og arbejdsvilkårene mest muligt.
(12a) Restrictions on the number and duration of cabotage operations are a necessary but intermediate stage aimed at encouraging the Member States to maximise the harmonisation of fiscal and working conditions.
De begrænsninger, der er fastsat i denne forordning, er derfor midlertidige og bør ophæves med virkning fra den 1. januar 2014.
The restrictions imposed under this Regulation are therefore temporary and should be lifted with effect from 1 January 2014.
På det indre marked bør begrænsninger for cabotagekørsel kun være midlertidige.
In an internal market restrictions on cabotage operations should only be temporary.
Der bør derfor henvises til en specifik dato for at fremme harmonisering af beskatnings- og arbejdsvilkårene.
Therefore, a specific date has to be mentioned to encourage the harmonisation of fiscal and working conditions.
(12b) Nogle medlemsstater, der grænser op til hinanden, har stærke økonomiske forbindelser, der har eksisteret i mange år.
(12b) Some neighbouring Member States have intensive, long-standing economic links.
Derfor bør sådanne medlemsstater have mulighed for at give nabomedlemsstaternes transportvirksomheder større adgang til cabotagekørsel.
Such Member States should therefore be allowed to grant wider access to cabotage to hauliers from the neighbouring Member States in question.
Medlemsstater, der har stærke økonomiske forbindelser, bør have mulighed for at åbne markedet mere for hinanden.
Member States which have strong economic links should be able to go further in opening up the market between them.
Se også ændringsforslaget vedrørende artikel 8, stk. 6b (nyt).
See also amendment creating a new paragraph 6b for Article 8.