natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
FORSLAG TIL EUROPA-PARLAMENTETS LOVGIVNINGSMÆSSIGE BESLUTNING om udvidelse af anvendelsen af forordning (EF) nr. [...] om medaljer og møntefterligninger, der ligner euromønter, til at omfatte ikke-deltagende medlemsstater ( KOM(2004) 39 – C5-0076/2004 – 2004/0011(CNS))
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION on the proposal for a Council regulation extending the application of Regulation (EC) No….. concerning medals and tokens similar to the euro coins to the non-participating Member States ( COM(2004) 39 – C5‑0076/2004 – 2004/0011(CNS))
– der henviser til EF-traktatens artikel 308, der danner grundlag for Rådets høring af Parlamentet ( C5-0076/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C5‑0076/2004),
Your rapporteur believes that now, after more than two years of experience with the physical euro, it is the right time to assess the success, quality and possible problems of Europe's currency.
Your rapporteur believes that now, after more than two years of experience with the physical euro, it is the right time to assess the success, quality and possible problems of Europe's currency.
In particular, with regards to euro coins, it is essential that the public is protected against any sort of fraud arising from confusion with closely similar tokens or medals.
In particular, with regards to euro coins, it is essential that the public is protected against any sort of fraud arising from confusion with closely similar tokens or medals.
Since the euro changeover, there have been a rising number of cases of fraudulent use of fake euro coins in coin operated machines.
Since the euro changeover, there have been a rising number of cases of fraudulent use of fake euro coins in coin operated machines.
Current EU and national law in this domain has proved inefficient and does not contain sufficient provisions to correctly address these problems.
Current EU and national law in this domain has proved inefficient and does not contain sufficient provisions to correctly address these problems.
As euro coins circulate in a large number of Member States, it is necessary to have a set of rules respected by all participants.
As euro coins circulate in a large number of Member States, it is necessary to have a set of rules respected by all participants.
Therefore, in essence, this is a measure aimed at preserving the legal tender status of authentic euro coins and thus avoid any devalorisation of our currency's value and reputation.
Therefore, in essence, this is a measure aimed at preserving the legal tender status of authentic euro coins and thus avoid any devalorisation of our currency's value and reputation.
Your rapporteur agrees with the proposal's intention to regulate the use of the terms “euro” and “euro cent” and of the euro symbol (€) on these metallic objects.
Your rapporteur agrees with the proposal's intention to regulate the use of the terms “euro” and “euro cent” and of the euro symbol (€) on these metallic objects.
The proposal does this by defining the levels of similarity to the euro coins that should be banned for medals and tokens.
The proposal does this by defining the levels of similarity to the euro coins that should be banned for medals and tokens.
Indirectly, this also gives clear guidelines for those companies ("token manufacturers") producing such medals and tokens to remain within the law.
Indirectly, this also gives clear guidelines for those companies ("token manufacturers") producing such medals and tokens to remain within the law.
On the other hand, the Commission has extensively consulted representatives of the coin operated industry, which seems to be in favour of a regulatory framework such as the one before you, as the cost that is caused by fraud in vending machines is likely to be reduced if the proposal is enacted.
On the other hand, the Commission has extensively consulted representatives of the coin operated industry, which seems to be in favour of a regulatory framework such as the one before you, as the cost that is caused by fraud in vending machines is likely to be reduced if the proposal is enacted.
Finally, it should be noted that the main proposal is accompanied by another one aimed at extending the scope of the Regulation to those countries which concluded an agreement with the EU on the use of the euro - Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican City.
Finally, it should be noted that the main proposal is accompanied by another one aimed at extending the scope of the Regulation to those countries which concluded an agreement with the EU on the use of the euro - Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican City.
Your rapporteur has analysed the text of the two proposed Council regulations and has no objections.
Your rapporteur has analysed the text of the two proposed Council regulations and has no objections.
He therefore proposes to approve the texts without amendments.
He therefore proposes to approve the texts without amendments.
He wishes to express the continued full-hearted support of the European Parliament for the historic project of Economic and Monetary Union and its single currency, the euro.
He wishes to express the continued full-hearted support of the European Parliament for the historic project of Economic and Monetary Union and its single currency, the euro.
17. marts 2004 ENDELIG A5-0157/2004 ***I
17 March 2004 FINAL A5-0157/2004 ***I
1. om forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning om administrativt samarbejde på punktafgiftsområdet
1. on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties
2. om forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv om ændring af Rådets direktiv 77/799/EØF om gensidig bistand mellem medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder inden for området direkte skatter, visse punktafgifter og afgifter på forsikringspræmier og Rådets direktiv 92/12/EØF om den generelle ordning for punktafgiftspligtige varer, om oplægning og omsætning heraf samt om kontrol hermed
2. on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive amending Council Directive 77/799/EEC concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation, certain excise duties and taxation of insurance premiums and Council Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such product
Med skrivelse af 18. december 2003 forelagde Kommissionen i overensstemmelse med EF-traktatens artikel 251, stk. 2, og artikel 95 Parlamentet 1. forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning om administrativt samarbejde på punktafgiftsområdet og 2. om forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv om ændring af Rådets direktiv 77/799/EØF om gensidig bistand mellem medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder inden for området direkte skatter, visse punktafgifter og afgifter på forsikringspræmier og Rådets direktiv 92/12/EØF om den generelle ordning for punktafgiftspligtige varer, om oplægning og omsætning heraf samt om kontrol hermed ( KOM(2003) 797 – 2003/0309(COD) og 2003/0310(COD)).
By letter of 18 December 2003 the Commission submitted to Parliament, pursuant to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, 1. the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties and 2. the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive amending Council Directive 77/799/EEC concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation, certain excise duties and taxation of insurance premiums and Council Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such product ( COM(2003) 797 – 2003/0309(COD)) and 2003/0310(COD)).
På mødet den 12. januar 2004 meddelte Parlamentets formand, at dette forslag var henvist til Udvalget om Økonomi og Valutaspørgsmål som korresponderende udvalg og til Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og det Indre Marked som rådgivende udvalg (C5‑0660/2003 og C5–0661/2003).
At the sitting of 12 January 2004 the President of Parliament announced that he had referred these proposals to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs as the committee responsible and the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market for its opinion (C5‑0660/2003 and C5‑0661/2003).
På mødet den 20. januar 2004 valgte Udvalget om Økonomi og Valutaspørgsmål Christa Randzio-Plath til ordfører.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs appointed Christa Randzio-Plath rapporteur at its meeting of 20 January 2004.
På møder den 22. februar og 16. marts 2004 behandlede udvalget Kommissionens forslag og udkastet til betænkning.
The committee considered the Commission proposals and draft report at its meetings of 22 February 2004 and 16 March 2004.
På sidstnævnte møde vedtog det enstemmigt forslagene til lovgivningsmæssig beslutning.
At the last meeting it adopted the draft legislative resolution unanimously.
Til stede under afstemningen var: Christa Randzio-Plath (formand og ordfører), Philippe A.R. Herzog (næstformand), John Purvis (næstformand), Hans Udo Bullmann, Bert Doorn (for Othmar Karas), Jonathan Evans, Carles-Alfred Gasòliba i Böhm, Robert Goebbels, Lisbeth Grönfeldt Bergman, Christopher Huhne, Christoph Werner Konrad, Werner Langen (for Ingo Friedrich), Astrid Lulling, Thomas Mann (for Generoso Andria), David W. Martin, Hans-Peter Mayer, Simon Francis Murphy (for Mary Honeyball), Fernando Pérez Royo, José Javier Pomés Ruiz (for José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil), Alexander Radwan, Bernhard Rapkay, Mónica Ridruejo, Peter William Skinner, Helena Torres Marques, Bruno Trentin, Ieke van den Burg (for Pervenche Berès) og Theresa Villiers.
The following were present for the vote: Christa Randzio-Plath (chairwoman and rapporteur), Philippe A.R. Herzog (vice-chairman), John Purvis (vice-chairman), Hans Udo Bullmann, Bert Doorn (for Othmar Karas), Jonathan Evans, Carles-Alfred Gasòliba i Böhm, Robert Goebbels, Lisbeth Grönfeldt Bergman, Christopher Huhne, Christoph Werner Konrad, Werner Langen (for Ingo Friedrich), Astrid Lulling, Thomas Mann (for Generoso Andria), David W. Martin, Hans-Peter Mayer, Simon Francis Murphy (for Mary Honeyball), Fernando Pérez Royo, José Javier Pomés Ruiz (for José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil), Alexander Radwan, Bernhard Rapkay, Mónica Ridruejo, Peter William Skinner, Helena Torres Marques, Bruno Trentin, Ieke van den Burg (for Pervenche Berès) and Theresa Villiers.
Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og det Indre Marked vedtog den 22. januar 2004 ikke at afgive udtalelse (2003/0309(COD)).
The Committee on Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market decided on 22 January 2004 not to deliver an opinion (2003/0309(COD)).
Udtalelsen fra Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og det Indre Marked er vedføjet denne betænkning (2003/0310(COD)).
The opinion of the Committee on Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market is attached (2003/0310(COD)).
FORSLAG TIL EUROPA-PARLAMENTETS LOVGIVNINGSMÆSSIGE BESLUTNING om forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning om administrativt samarbejde på punktafgiftsområdet ( KOM(2003) 797 – C5‑0660/2003 – 2003/0309(COD))
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties ( COM(2003) 797 – C5-0660/2003 – 2003/0309(COD))
– der henviser til Kommissionens forslag til Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet ( KOM(2003) 797 ) Endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT. ,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003) 797 ) Not yet published in OJ. ,
– der har fået forslaget forelagt af Kommissionen, jf. EF-traktatens artikel 251, stk. 2, og artikel 95 (C5‑0660/2003),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C5‑0660/2003),
– der henviser til betænkning fra Udvalget om Økonomi og Valutaspørgsmål (A5‑0157/2004),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A5‑0157/2004),
A. der henviser til, at det næppe er muligt på nuværende tidspunkt at harmonisere indirekte skatter ved hjælp af lovgivning, og at en styrkelse af samarbejdet mellem skatte- og afgiftsadministrationerne er en midlertidig løsning, som bevarer national suverænitet, og som er nødvendig for at løse problemet med reducerede indtægter fra moms og indirekte skatter som følge af afgiftssvig og organiseret kriminalitet,
A. whereas the harmonisation of indirect taxation is hardly feasible by legislation at the present moment; whereas closer cooperation and coordination amongst tax authorities is a temporary solution that preserves national sovereignty, and which is necessary to solve the problem of decreased VAT and excise duties revenues caused by tax fraud and organised crime,
FORSLAG TIL EUROPA-PARLAMENTETS LOVGIVNINGSMÆSSIGE BESLUTNING om forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv om ændring af Rådets direktiv 77/799/EØF om gensidig bistand mellem medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder inden for området direkte skatter, visse punktafgifter og afgifter på forsikringspræmier og Rådets direktiv 92/12/EØF om den generelle ordning for punktafgiftspligtige varer, om oplægning og omsætning heraf samt om kontrol hermed ( KOM(2003) 797 – C5‑0661/2003 – 2003/0310(COD))
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive amending Council Directive 77/799/EEC concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation, certain excise duties and taxation of insurance premiums and Council Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such product ( COM(2003) 797 – C5-0661/2003 – 2003/0310(COD))
– der har fået forslaget forelagt af Kommissionen, jf. EF-traktatens artikel 251, stk. 2, og artikel 95 (C5‑0661/2003),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C5-0661/2003 ),
– der henviser til betænkning fra Udvalget om Økonomi og Valutaspørgsmål og udtalelse fra Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og det Indre Marked (A5‑0157/2004),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (A5‑0157/2004),
A. der henviser til, at det næppe er muligt på nuværende tidspunkt at harmonisere indirekte skatter ved hjælp af lovgivning, og at en styrkelse af samarbejdet mellem skatte- og afgiftsadministrationerne er en midlertidig løsning, som bevarer national suverænitet, og som er nødvendig for at løse problemet med reducerede indtægter fra moms og indirekte skatter som følge af afgiftssvig og organiseret kriminalitet,
A. whereas the harmonisation of indirect taxation is hardly feasible by legislation at the present moment; whereas closer cooperation and coordination amongst tax authorities is a temporary solution that preserves national sovereignty, and which is necessary to solve the problem of decreased VAT and excise duties revenues caused by tax fraud and organised crime;
Samarbejdet mellem medlemsstater er en af de vigtigste forudsætninger for et velfungerende indre marked, hvor skadelig praksis som f.eks. smugling og afgiftssvig er begrænset til det mindst mulige.
Co-operation between Member States constitutes one of the main conditions for a well-functioning internal market in which harmful practices such as smuggling and tax fraud are minimised.
Det er faktisk ikke politisk muligt på nuværende tidspunkt at indføre lovgivning for at harmonisere indirekte skatter, men ikke desto mindre kan der stadig opnås resultater ved hjælp af et styrket samarbejde mellem skatte- og afgiftsadministrationerne.
Legislation is not really a political option at the present juncture with regards to harmonisation of indirect taxation; nevertheless, results can still be achieved by closer cooperation and coordination amongst tax authorities.
Dette styrkede samarbejde er en mulig midlertidig løsning, som ikke bringer den nationale suverænitet i fare.
This closer collaboration is a possible temporary solution that does not endanger national sovereignty.
Under hensyntagen til direkte og indirekte skatters særlige karakter har Kommissionen forelagt adskillige ændringer, som i sidste ende skulle føre til tre uafhængige retsakter.
Taking into account the specific nature of direct and indirect taxes, the Commission has prepared several modifications that should, in the final stage, lead to three autonomous legal instruments.
For det første Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1798/2003 om administrativt samarbejde vedrørende merværdiafgift og ophævelse af forordning (EØF) nr. 218/92 EUT L 264 af 15.10.2003, s. 1. .
Firstly, the Council Regulation 1798/2003/EC on administrative co-operation in the field of value added tax and repealing Regulation No. 218/92 OJ L 264, 15.10.2003 .
For det andet af det nyligt ændrede Rådets direktiv 77/799/EØF om gensidig bistand mellem medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder inden for området direkte skatter og afgifter på forsikringspræmier.
Secondly, the recently amended Council Directive 77/799/EEC concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation and taxation of insurance premiums.
Endelig dette forslag, som behandles af ordføreren, og som har til formål at indføre regler for samarbejde på punktafgiftsområdet.
Finally, this proposal dealt by your rapporteur, which aims to set up rules for co-operation in the field of excise duties.
Generelt set adskiller dette forslag til forordning sig ikke væsentligt fra det tidligere forslag om moms.
Overall, this draft regulation does not differ significantly from the previous one concerning VAT.
De kompetente myndigheder, som skal indhente alle nødvendige oplysninger for at påvise svig, er ikke direkte nævnt i dette forslag i modsætning til i forslaget om moms.
The competent authorities which are to obtain all information needed to prove fraud, are not directly enumerated in this proposal, in contrast to the VAT one.
Forslaget bør lette det decentraliserede samarbejde (dvs. mellem toldvæsener eller andre territoriale enheder - de såkaldte "forbindelseskontorer").
The Regulation should facilitate the decentralised co-operation (e.g. between customs services or other territorial units - so-called 'liaison' departments.)
De anmodede oplysninger bør forelægges inden tre måneder.
Requested information should be provided within three months.
Ordføreren glæder sig over det klare mål om at tilskynde til samtidig kontrol, der udføres af to eller flere medlemsstater (finansieret via Fiscalis-programmet EFT L 341 af 17.12.2002. ).
Your rapporteur welcomes the clear intention of encouraging simultaneous controls conducted by two or more Member States (financed by the Fiscalis programme OJ L 341, 17.12.2002 ).
Der er ikke desto mindre en vis bekymring med hensyn til det forhold, at national lovgivning i visse medlemsstater med tiden kunne medføre, at det bliver muligt at begrænse sådanne kontroller på punktafgiftsområdet.
Nevertheless, there is some concern with regards to the fact that national legislation in some Member States might eventually be able to restrict such controls in the field of excise duties.
I modsætning til de to andre retsakter underrettes Kommissionen i dette tilfælde om de teknikker for svig, som er blevet identificeret i forbindelse med den samtidige kontrol.
Unlike the two other legal instruments, in this case the Commission shall be informed about the fraud techniques identified during the simultaneous control.
En form for kodeks for god praksis bør derfor indføres uden at skade medlemsstaternes finansielle interesser.
As such, a kind of Code of Good Practice should be proposed without harming the financial interests of the Members States.
Endelig forelægger Kommissionen Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet en rapport om betingelserne for anvendelsen af denne forordning hvert femte år (hvert tredje år for moms), og en sådan periode synes at være mere hensigtsmæssig.
Finally, the Commission's report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Regulation shall be produced every five years (three years for VAT), and such a time period seems to be more appropriate.
Ud over forslaget til forordning er der et andet forslag, der har til formål at specificere disse retsakter.
Apart form the Draft Regulation there is the second proposal that aims to accomplish the specification of each legal instrument.
I forslaget fjernes alle henvisninger til punkafgifter fra direktiv 77/799/EØF.
Thus, it removes all notions of excise duties from the directive 77/799/EEC.
Herudover fjernes adskillige punkter om anvendelse af en elektronisk database og samarbejde fra direktiv 92/12/EØF om den generelle ordning for punktafgiftspligtige varer, om oplægning og omsætning heraf samt om kontrol hermed.
Moreover, several paragraphs on the maintenance of an electronic database and co-operation shall be deleted as well from the directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products.
Alle disse ændringer er af rent teknisk karakter.
All of these changes are of a purely technical nature.
Kommissionen har ligesom i forbindelse med forordningen på momsområdet baseret sit nuværende forslag på traktatens artikel 95, dvs. proceduren med fælles beslutningstagning.
Similarly to the Regulation applicable in the field of VAT, the Commission has based its present proposal on Article 95 of the Treaty, i. e. co-decision.
Kommissionen argumenterer for sin holdning med, at dette forslag udelukkende vedrører administrativt samarbejde og ikke har nogen skattemæssige konsekvenser.
As such, the Commission pursues its view that this proposal is purely about administrative co-operation and has no fiscal consequences.
Ordføreren tilslutter sig fuldt ud dette.
Your rapporteur fully agrees with this opinion.
Ordføreren er dog allerede blevet orienteret om, at Rådet med meget stor sandsynlighed agter at ændre retsgrundlaget og anmode Parlamentet om en udtalelse (høringsprocedure).
However, she has been already informed that, very probably, the Council again intends to change the legal base and to ask the Parliament for its opinion (consultation).
Ordføreren kan ikke på nuværende tidspunkt se nogen grund til at genoverveje Parlamentets holdning og vil fortsat modsætte sig en enhver ændring af retsgrundlaget og forsvare Parlamentets beføjelser i henhold til proceduren med fælles beslutningstagning som omhandlet i traktatens artikel 95.
Your rapporteur does not see any reason at this juncture to re-evaluate Parliament's position, and will continue to contest any change of the legal basis and defend Parliament's prerogatives under the co-decision procedure as laid down in Article 95 of the Treaty.
9.marts 2004 UDTALELSE FRA UDVALGET OM RETLIGE ANLIGGENDER OG DET INDRE MARKED
9 March 2004 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS AND THE INTERNAL MARKET
om forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets direktiv om ændring af Rådets direktiv 77/799/EØF om gensidig bistand mellem medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder inden for området direkte skatter, visse punktafgifter og afgifter på forsikringspræmier og Rådets direktiv 92/12/EØF om den generelle ordning for punktafgiftspligtige varer, om oplægning og omsætning heraf samt om kontrol hermed
on the proposal for a directive amending Council Directive 77/797/EEC concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation, certain excise duties and taxation of insurance premiums and Council Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products