natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kan Unionen ikke i givet fald gøre det samme, som man gjorde i forbindelse med Finlands, Sveriges og Østrigs tiltrædelse, det vil sige at Unionen forhandler og når til enighed med hvert enkelt af ansøgerlandene om pladserne i Parlamentet og stemmerne i Rådet i tiltrædelsestraktaten?
Would it not then be possible for the Union to act as it did at the time of the accession of Finland, Sweden and Austria, i.e. negotiate and reach agreement with each of the applicant countries separately on seats in Parliament and votes in the Council in the treaty of accession?
Dermed er der ikke brug for Nice-traktaten som grundlag for nye medlemsstaters tiltrædelse.
The Treaty of Nice would not then be needed as a basis for the accession of new Member States.
Vil denne fremgangsmåde ikke være hensigtsmæssig for udvidelsen af Unionen i tilfælde af, at irerne stemmer nej til Nice-traktaten igen?
Is this not an appropriate procedure to use for the enlargement of the Union should the Irish people vote against the Treaty of Nice once again?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0543/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0543/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Fremtidige tiltrædelsestraktater for nye medlemsstater
to the Commission Subject: Future accession treaties for new Member States
Kommissionen forelagde i juli måned sin meddelelse om bedre lovgivning.
This month, the Commission delivered its communication on better regulation.
Et centralt mål med denne meddelelse er at sikre, at der foretages en vurdering af alle kommissionsforslags virkninger.
A central aim of this communication is to ensure that an impact assessment of all Commission proposals is carried out.
Hvilke praktiske foranstaltninger er Rådet i færd med at træffe for at sikre, at virkningerne af Rådets ændringer til Kommissionens forslag vurderes?
What practical measures are being taken by the Council to ensure that they carry out impact assessments on Council amendments to Commission proposals?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0545/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0545/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Foranstaltninger til begrænsning af den illegale indvandring til De Kanariske Øer
to the Council Subject: Measures to restrict illegal immigration into the Canaries
Hvilke foranstaltninger foreslår Rådet på baggrund af de aftaler, der blev indgået på topmødet i Sevilla, for at begrænse den massive illegale indvandring til De Kanariske Øer?
On the basis of the agreements adopted at the Seville summit, what measures does the Council propose to restrict the massive influx of illegal immigrants into the Canary Islands.
Hvilke foranstaltninger foreslår det specielt for at standse denne ukontrollerede indvandring ved udrejsestederne af hensyn til immigranternes sikkerhed?
In particular, what measures are proposed to curb this irregular form of immigration at the places of origin, in order to ensure the safety of the immigrants themselves?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0546/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0546/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Foranstaltninger til begrænsning af den illegale indvandring til De Kanariske Øer
to the Commission Subject: Measures to restrict illegal immigration into the Canaries
Hvilke foranstaltninger foreslår Kommissionen på baggrund af de aftaler, der blev indgået på topmødet i Sevilla, for at begrænse den massive illegale indvandring til De Kanariske Øer?
On the basis of the agreements adopted at the Seville summit, what measures does the Commission propose to restrict the massive influx of illegal immigrants into the Canary Islands.
Hvilke foranstaltninger foreslår den specielt for at standse denne ukontrollerede indvandring ved udrejsestederne af hensyn til immigranternes sikkerhed?
In particular, what measures are proposed to curb this irregular form of immigration at the places of origin, in order to ensure the safety of the immigrants themselves?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0547/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0547/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Slutbehandling af aftalen om det multilaterale atom- og miljøprogram
to the Council Subject: Finalising of the agreement concerning the Multilateral Nuclear Environmental Program
Ifølge Kommissionen (GD for Eksterne Forbindelser) var det bilaterale arbejde vedrørende EU's forbindelser med Rusland i en stor del af 2001 bl.a. koncentreret om energi, miljøbeskyttelse og nuklear sikkerhed.
According to the Commission ( DG External Relations ) a part of the bilateral work concerning the EU's relations with Russia focused for much of 2001 on energy, environmental protection and nuclear safety.
De pågældende mål skulle gennemføres ved indgåelse af aftalen om et multilateralt atom- og miljøprogram, MNEPR, som tager sigte på rensning af radioaktivt affald i det nordvestlige Rusland, og gennem miljøpartnerskabet inden for rammerne af den nordlige dimension, NDEP.
This was meant to be done through the conclusion of the agreement on a Multilateral Nuclear Environmental Program, (MNEPR), aimed at cleaning up radioactive waste in north-west Russia and through the Northern Dimension Environmental Partnership (NDEP).
Det udtales også i pressebaggrundsnotatet fra Kommissionen (udsendt den 27. maj 2002) inden det niende topmøde mellem EU og Rusland i Moskva i maj 2002, at miljø og nuklear sikkerhed vil blive drøftet, og at det ville være vigtigt at få Den Russiske Føderation til at slutbehandle MNEPR-aftalen hurtigst muligt.
Similarly, in the press brief from the Commission (issued on 27 May 2002) before the Ninth EU-Russia Summit held in Moscow in May 2002, it was stated that the environment and nuclear safety were going to be discussed and that it would be important to ensure that the Russian federation finalise the MNEPR agreement as soon as possible.
Men i den fælles erklæring, der udsendtes efter topmødet mellem EU og Rusland, omtales MNEPR overhovedet ikke.
In the Joint Statement issued after the EU-Russia Summit, however, no reference was made to the MNEPR.
Den 9. juli skal der også afholdes en donorkonference om NDEP.
A pledge conference on the NDEP is also to be held on 9 July.
Hvorledes er situationen nu med hensyn til MNEPR?
What is the current situation concerning the MNEPR?
Hvilke hindringer er der for at nå til enighed om MNEPR?
What are the obstacles to the conclusion of an agreement on the MNEPR?
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Rådet træffe i nær fremtid for at få Den Russiske Føderation til at slutbehandle aftalen?
What measures is the Council going to take in the near future in order to ensure that the Russian Federation finalises the agreement?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0548/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0548/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Slutbehandling af aftalen om det multilaterale atom- og miljøprogram
to the Commission Subject: Finalising of the agreement concerning the Multilateral Nuclear Environmental Program
Ifølge Kommissionen (GD for Eksterne Forbindelser) var det bilaterale arbejde vedrørende EU's forbindelser med Rusland i en stor del af 2001 bl.a. koncentreret om energi, miljøbeskyttelse og nuklear sikkerhed.
According to the Commission (DG External Relations), part of the bilateral work concerning the EU's relations with Russia focused for much of 2001 on energy, environmental protection and nuclear safety.
De pågældende mål skulle gennemføres ved indgåelse af aftalen om et multilateralt atom- og miljøprogram, MNEPR, som tager sigte på rensning af radioaktivt affald i det nordvestlige Rusland, og gennem miljøpartnerskabet inden for rammerne af den nordlige dimension, NDEP.
This was meant to be done through the conclusion of the agreement on a Multilateral Nuclear Environmental Program (MNEPR), aimed at cleaning up radioactive waste in north-west Russia and through the Northern Dimension Environmental Partnership (NDEP).
Det udtales også i pressebaggrundsnotatet fra Kommissionen (udsendt den 27. maj 2002) inden det niende topmøde mellem EU og Rusland i Moskva i maj 2002, at miljø og nuklear sikkerhed vil blive drøftet, og at det ville være vigtigt at få Den Russiske Føderation til at slutbehandle MNEPR-aftalen hurtigst muligt.
Similarly, in the press briefing from the Commission issued on 27 May 2002 before the Ninth EU-Russia Summit held in Moscow in May 2002, it was stated that the environment and nuclear safety were going to be discussed and that it would be important to ensure that the Russian Federation finalised the MNEPR agreement as soon as possible.
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen træffe i nær fremtid for at få Den Russiske Føderation til at slutbehandle aftalen?
What measures is the Commission going to take in the near future in order to ensure that the Russian Federation finalises the agreement?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0549/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0549/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Undtagelse for pilotprojekter på konkurrenceområdet
to the Commission Subject: Derogations from the rules on competition for pilot projects
Det forudskikkes, at koncessionen for Brennermotorvejen A22 mellem Modena og Brenner endnu ikke er tildelt af de italienske myndigheder, da der er taget forbehold herimod i Kommissionen.
The operating concession for the A 22 Brenner motorway between Modena and the Brenner Pass has not yet been granted by the Italian authorities, apparently because of reservations expressed by the Commission.
Ses der bort fra de i almindelighed nødvendige foranstaltninger imod konkurrencefordrejning, bør Kommissionen og det kompetente kommissionsmedlem efter en grundig undersøgelse af sagen indse, at der ikke er tale om nogen normal koncession, men et pilotprojekt.
If, instead of concentrating on the measures generally required to combat distortion of competition, the Commission - and, in particular, the Commissioner with special responsibility for competition issues - were to study this matter in greater depth, it would become clear that a pilot project is involved here and not the normal granting of an operating concession.
Er det derfor ikke tænkeligt og er det ikke i EU's allerstørste interesse, at man på et følsomt område støtter og fremmer et pilotprojekt, der afvikles i koncessionstiden og vedrører finansiering af jernbanetransport gennem vejtransport, i stedet for at man hindrer det som følge af konkurrencefordrejning?
Is it not therefore imaginable, and would it not be in the EU's best interests in a sensitive area, for a pilot project, which would be limited in time to the duration of the operating concession and whereby some of the revenue generated from motorway tolls would be used for the upgrading of the railway line, to be promoted and supported rather than hampered on the grounds that it might distort competition?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0550/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0550/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Forebyggelse af tobaksafhængighed blandt børn
to the Commission Subject: Preventing tobacco addiction among children
I juni vedtog Kommissionen et forslag til rådshenstilling om forebyggelse af rygning og om initiativer til forbedring af bekæmpelse af tobaksrygning.
In June, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council recommendation on the prevention of smoking and on initiatives to improve tobacco control.
Vil Kommissionen oplyse, hvad den håber på at opnå med sit forslag, navnlig med hensyn til at afskrække børn og unge fra at begynde at ryge og/eller få dem til at holde op med at ryge, og håber Kommissionen, at det med tiden bliver muligt at fremlægge et direktiv om dette spørgsmål?
Will the Commission state what it hopes to achieve with its proposal, with particular regard to discouraging children and young people from starting to smoke and/or encouraging them to give up smoking, and does it hope that, eventually, it might be possible to submit a proposal for a directive on this issue?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0551/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0551/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Kommissionens meddelelse om hovedperspektiverne for EU efter 2006
to the Commission Subject: Commission Communication on main perspectives for the EU after 2006
I den almindelige gennemgang til foreløbigt forslag til budget for 2003 anfører Kommissionen, at den i 2004 vil udarbejde en meddelelse om de vigtigste aspekter af EU's udvikling, af dens politikker og af de finansielle rammer efter 2006.
In the General Introduction to the Preliminary Draft Budget for 2003, the Commission states that it will come forward in 2004 with a Communication on the main perspectives of the development of the Union, of its policies and of the future financial framework after 2006.
Vil Kommissionen garantere, at den i sin meddelelse vil lægge større vægt på bekæmpelse af fattigdomsproblemet i EU, gældssanering af de fattigste lande, øgede midler til innovation og små og mellemstore virksomheder og opstilling af garantier for, at rand- og øområder som Irland fortsat vil have adgang til de nødvendige midler til løsning af en række infrastrukturbehov?
Will the Commission give assurances that it will place greater emphasis in its Communication on tackling poverty in the EU, debt relief for the poorest countries, providing more resources for innovation and SMEs, and ensuring that peripheral and island regions such as Ireland continue to have access to the funds required to tackle a range of infrastructure needs?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0552/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0552/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Det danske formandskab og Irak
to the Council Subject: Danish Presidency and Iraq
Vil Rådet under det danske formandskab redegøre for, hvordan det opfatter EU's forbindelser med Irak i fremtiden, og har det planer om at besøge Irak i de resterende måneder af formandskabet?
Will the Danish Presidency set out its views on the future of EU relations with Iraq, and does it have any plans to visit Iraq during its term of office?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0553/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0553/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Medicinalvarer til fattige lande
to the Commission Subject: Drugs for poor countries
Vil Kommissionen forelægge en ajourført vurdering af det EU-initiativ, der har til formål at give fattige lande adgang til medicinalvarer, således at udviklingslande uden egen lægemiddelproduktion kan erhverve vigtige lægemidler til overkommelige priser, og hvilken rolle vil kandidatlandene efter Kommissionens opfattelse kunne spille i dette initiativ?
Will the Commission provide an up-to-date assessment of the EU initiative aimed at providing access to drugs for poor countries, whereby developing countries with no domestic drug production of their own can obtain affordable supplies of essential medicines, and indicate the extent to which it foresees the applicant countries playing a role in this initiative?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0554/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0554/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Narkotikabekæmpelse
to the Council Subject: Tackling Drugs
Udbredelsen af narkotika, herunder crack-kokain, skaber fortsat alvorlige problemer for samfundet, nærmere betegnet afhængighed, kriminalitet, behandling og tilsyn.
The prevalence of illegal drugs, including crack-cocaine, continues to cause serious problems for society in terms of addiction, criminality, treatment and policing.
Vil Rådet under det danske formandskab under hensyntagen til nærhedsprincippet garantere, at det vil gøre narkotikabekæmpelse til en af sine vigtigste opgaver, og vil det aflægge beretning for Parlamentet i december 2002 om de initiativer og foranstaltninger, det har gennemført i den forbindelse?
Will the Danish Presidency, in the light of subsidiarity, give assurances that the Council will make the fight against illegal drugs a top priority of the Danish Presidency, and will it report back to the House in December 2002 on the initiatives and actions it has undertaken in this regard?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0555/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0555/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Gældseftergivelse og G8
to the Commission Subject: Debt relief and the G8
Vil Kommissionen redegøre for G8's afgørelse om at øge gældseftergivelsen til de fattigste lande med 1 mia. dollar og hjælpeorganisationernes svar om, at gældseftergivelsen kun lige ville opfange prisfaldet på varer såsom kaffe og bomuld, og kommentarerne fra den canadiske talsmand for Care, der bemærkede, at De Forenede Staters Kongres havde bevilget 40 mia. dollar til bekæmpelse af terrorisme tre dage efter angrebene den 11. september, men at sådanne enorme summer ikke stod til rådighed til at hjælpe verdens fattige?
Will the Commission make a statement on the decision of the G8 to increase debt relief for the poorest countries by 1 billion dollars and the response of aid agencies that the debt relief would barely make up for the fall in prices for commodities such as coffee and cotton and on the comments of the Canadian spokesman for Care who noted that the US Congress had approved 40 billion dollars to fight terrorism three days after the 11 September attacks but that such huge sums were not forthcoming to help the world's poor?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0556/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0556/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Nye beføjelser til medlemsstaterne vedrørende sikkerhed til søs og Sellafield
to the Council Subject: New powers for Member States in maritime safety and Sellafield
Rådet vedtog for nylig et direktiv, der tager sigte på at styrke medlemsstaterne beføjelser til som kyststater at gribe ind i tilfælde af risiko for en ulykke eller trussel om forurening af deres kyster selv uden for deres territorialfarvande.
The Council recently adopted a Directive aimed at strengthening the powers of Member States to take action, as coastal states, in the event of a risk of an accident or threat of pollution of their coasts, even outside their territorial waters.
Det giver dem ligeledes mulighed for at forhindre skibe i at forlade havne under ekstremt ugunstige vejrforhold.
It also gives them the possibility of preventing vessels from leaving port in extremely adverse weather conditions.
Mener Rådet på baggrund af Irlands vedvarende ængstelse over sikkerheden af atomtransporter til og fra Sellafield, at dette nye direktiv kan bruges til at standse sådanne transporter?
Given Ireland's continuing concerns about the safety of nuclear shipments to and from Sellafield, does the Council consider that this new Directive could be used to halt such shipments?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0557/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0557/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: EU-støtte til seniorborgere
to the Commission Subject: EU support for senior citizens
Som det vil være Kommissionen bekendt, er der i de senere år taget adskillige initiativer for at understrege den positive rolle, som seniorborgere spiller i vort samfund, bl.a. blev der afholdt et seniorparlament i Luxembourg i 1993, hvor man opfordrede til oprettelse af et seniorborger-parlament i alle medlemsstater, og en konference i 1998 om seniorborgere i det 21. århundrede.
As the Commission will recall, several initiatives have been taken over the years to highlight the positive role played by senior citizens in our society, including the holding of a Senior Citizens' Parliament in Luxembourg in 1993 which called for a Senior Citizens' Parliament in each Member State and a conference in 1998 on 'Senior Citizens in the 21st Century.'
Vil Kommissionen for det første sikre, at delegationsmedlemmer fra mindre lande modtager samme støtte på EU-plan, så de kan deltage i møder i Den Europæiske Sammenslutning af Pensionerede og Ældre, hvilket ikke længere er muligt som følge af EU-nedskæringer, og vil Kommissionen for det andet oplyse, hvordan de ovennævnte initiativer er blevet fulgt op, og hvilke skridt medlemsstaterne har taget for at inddrage seniorborgeres repræsentanter i strukturer, hvor der træffes afgørelse både på lokalt og nationalt plan?
Will the Commission firstly ensure that delegates from smaller countries are equally funded at EU level so that they can attend the meetings of the European Federation of Retired and Elderly Persons which, because of EU cut-backs, is no longer possible and, secondly, will the Commission state what action has been taken on the initiatives outlined above and what steps have been taken by Member States to involve the representatives of senior citizens in decision-making bodies at both local and national level?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0558/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0558/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Fælles europæisk forskningsinitiativ inden for landbrug og fiskeri
to the Council Subject: Joint European research initiative in agriculture and fisheries
Det danske formandskab har meddelt, at det agter at etablere et fælles europæisk forskningsinitiativ til fordel for den europæiske fødevaresektor som helhed.
The Danish Presidency has stated its intention to establish a joint European research initiative to benefit the European food sector as a whole.
Formålet er at sikre, at europæisk landbrug og fiskeri samt fødevareindustrien kan fungere på et konkurrence- og bæredygtigt grundlag.
This is aimed at ensuring that European agriculture, fisheries and the food industry are competitive and sustainable.
Man sigter endvidere på at forbedre fødevaresikkerheden og den sundhedsmæssige kvalitet af befolkningens ernæring.
It is also aimed at improving food safety and the healthy nutrition of the population.
Kan Rådet love, at forskere fra det vestlige Irland vil blive indbudt til at deltage i dette fælles initiativ, og har det anmodet Kommissionen om at fremlægge et forslag med bl.a. en angivelse af det bevillingsniveau, som et sådant initiativ vil kræve?
Will the Council give assurances that researchers in the west of Ireland will be invited to participate in this joint initiative and has the Council requested the European Commission to come forward with a proposal including an indication of the funding levels that would be necessary for such an initiative?