natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I dag, den 23. maj 2002, vil der i Ækvatorialguinea på fuldstændig grundløse anklager, og uden at minimuskravene til en proces i en retsstat er opfyldt, falde dom over en række ledere af den demokratisk valgte opposition, herunder Plácido Micó, som er leder af en af de mest repræsentative grupperinger i oppositionen, Convergencia para la Democracia Social (CPDS).
Today, 23 May, various leaders of the Democratic opposition in Equatorial Guinea, including Plácido Micó, the leader of one of the most important of the opposition parties, Convergencia para la Democracia Social (Social Democratic Alliance), will be sentenced on the basis of utterly groundless accusation, and without the minimum legal guarantees befitting a constitutional state.
Denne retssag afslører ganske klart det ækvatorialguineanske styres totale mangel på vilje til at opfylde sine løfter til det internationale samfund, herunder EU, om at indlede overgangen til demokrati.
This court case is glaring proof of the absolute lack of my will on the part of the regime to meet the commitments given to the international community, including the EU, to begin the transition to democracy.
Hvilke skridt har EU taget eller vil EU tage på grundlag af denne retssag og for at beskytte den demokratiske opposition mod de uacceptable aggressioner fra Teodoro Obiang-diktaturets side?
What actions has the EU taken or will it take in connection with this court case, to protect the democratic opposition from the disgraceful attacks of the dictatorship of Teodoro Obiang.
SPØRGSMÅL H-0403/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0403/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Retssagen mod ledere af den demokratisk valgte opposition i Ækvatorialguinea
to the Commission Subject: Court case in Equatorial Guinea against leaders of the democratic opposition
Den 23. maj 2002 indledes der i Ækvatorialguinea, uden at minimuskravene til en proces i en retsstat er opfyldt, en retssag mod en række ledere af den demokratisk valgte opposition, herunder Plácido Micó, som er leder af Convergencia para la Democracia Social (CPDS); en af de anklagedes advokater er sat i husarrest.
On 23 May a court case opens in Equatorial Guinea, without the minimum legal guarantees befitting a constitutional state, against various leaders of the democratic opposition, including Plácido Micó, the leader of Convergencia para la Democracia Social (Social Democrat Alliance); one of the lawyers representing the accused is under house arrest.
Denne retssag viser endnu en gang det ækvatorialguineanske styres manglende vilje til at opfylde sine løfter til det internationale samfund, herunder EU, om at indlede overgangen til demokrati.
This court case yet again demonstrates the lack of any will on the part of the régime to meet the commitments given to the international community, including the EU, that it would begin the transition to democracy.
Har Kommissionen under henvisning til Lomé-konventionens artikel 5 og Cotonou-aftalens artikel 9 truffet nogen foranstaltninger mod det vedholdende udemokratiske styre i Ækvatorialguinea?
In view of Article 5 of the Lomé Convention and Article 9 of the Cotonu Agreement, has the Commission provided for any measures to penalise the continuing rejection of democracy by the regime in Equatorial Guinea?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0404/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0404/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
Jorge Hernández Mollar
Jorge Hernández Mollar
til Kommissionen Om: Ulovlig indvandring i EU fra Marokko
to the Commission Subject: Illegal immigration to the EU from Morocco
I associeringsaftalen med Marokko fastslås det, at den nødvendige dialog med henblik på at behandle spørgsmålet om "ulovlig indvandring og betingelserne for tilbagevenden" samt "indskrænkning af migrationspresset" bør prioriteres meget højt.
The Association Agreement with Morocco includes among its areas for priority action the need for dialogue to deal with illegal immigration and the conditions of return and the need to reduce migratory pressure.
Af handlingsplanen om asyl og migration for Marokko fremgår det, at det faktum, at der ikke kræves indrejsevisum af personer, der bruger Marokko som transitland, fremmer den ulovlige indvandring i EU og vanskeliggør tilbagetagelse på grund af manglende beviser.
The 'action plan for asylum and migration' for Morocco emphasises that Morocco's failure to require visas of emigrants crossing its territory facilitates the entry of illegal immigrants into the EU and makes returning them difficult since proofs cannot be supplied.
Den 18. september 2000 gav Rådet (almindelige anliggender) Kommissionen mandat til at føre forhandlinger om en general tilbagetagelsesaftale mellem EU og Marokko.
On 18 September 2000, the General Affairs Council mandated the Commission to negotiate a general EU-Morocco agreement on the return of immigrants.
Kommissionen bedes besvare følgende spørgsmål: Hvilke initiativer er der truffet med henblik på at indlede en dialog inden for associeringsaftalens rammer?
Can the Commission state what initiatives for dialogue are under way under the Association Agreement?
Anser Kommissionen det for realistisk at bruge det finansielle samarbejde til fordel for Marokko som pressionsmiddel for at sikre overholdelse af aftalens afsnit VI?
Does it consider it possible to use financial cooperation with Morocco as a lever for ensuring compliance with Title VI of the Agreement?
Agter den inden for den nærmeste fremtid at lægge pres på Marokko for at få landet til at indføre visumkrav for statsborgere fra tredjelande og dermed bremse den illegale indvandring i EU?
Does it believe that pressure can be put in the immediate future on Morocco to make visas compulsory for third-country nationals, as a means of preventing irregular entry into the EU?
Kan den gøre nærmere rede for, hvor langt man er nået i forhandlingerne om ovennævnte tilbagetagelsesaftale?
Can it provide information on the state of play as regards negotiation of the above-mentioned agreement on the return of immigrants?
Og kan den sikre, at medlemsstaterne og Europa-Parlamentet regelmæssigt bliver/vil blive informeret om udviklingen i disse forhandlinger?
Can the Commission take steps to ensure that the Member States and the European Parliament are kept informed, now and in the future and on a regular basis, on the progress of the negotiations?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0405/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0405/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Reducering af drivhusgasemissioner
to the Council Subject: Cutting back on greenhouse gas emissions
Hvilke planer har Rådet med hensyn til at reducere sit eget energiforbrug, set i lyset af de bindende forpligtelser til at reducere deres drivhusgasemissioner, som de femten medlemsstater har indgået i Kyoto-protokollen?
In view of binding committments made by the fifteen Member States under the Kyoto Protocol to reduce their emissions of the six greenhouse gases, what plans does the Council itself have to reduce its own consumption of energy?
Erkender det, at det kunne opnå en kraftig reducering ved blot at enes om, at Europa-Parlamentet kun skal have ét arbejdssted?
Does it recognise that it could make an enormous reduction simply by agreeing to a single working place for the European Parliament?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0406/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0406/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Anvendelse af EU-midler i Palæstina
to the Commission Subject: EU spending in Palestine
Undersøger Kommissionen de israelske myndigheders påstande om, at de har dokumentation for, at palæstinensere har anvendt EU-skatteborgeres penge til finansiering af terroristhandlinger?
Is the Commission investigating the allegations made by the Israeli authorities that they have documentary proof that EU taxpayers' money has been used by Palestinians to fund terrorist activities?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0407/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0407/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Anholdelse af oppositionsledere i Ækvatorialguinea
to the Council Subject: Arrest of opposition leaders in Equatorial Guinea
Generalsekretæren for partiet Convergencia para la Democracia Social (CPDS) i Ækvatorialguinea, Plácido Micó Abogo, blev anholdt den 9. maj og har siden befundet sig i husarrest for at skulle have deltaget i et møde hos Emilio Ndong Biyogo og Felipe Ondo Obiang, hvor der angiveligt skal være lagt planer om et statskup mod præsident Obiang.
The Secretary-General of the party Convergence for Social Democracy (CPDS) in Equatorial Guinea, Plácido Micó Abogo, has been under house arrest since he was arrested on 9 May 2002 on the grounds that an alleged 'meeting' at his house, at which plans for a coup against President Obiang are claimed to have been discussed, had included the participation of Emilio Ndong Biyogo and Felipe Ondo Obiang.
Hvilke oplysninger ligger rådsformandskabet inde med om anholdelsen af regeringsmodstandere tilhørende demokratiske partier som f.eks. CPDS i Ækvatorialguinea?
What information can the Council Presidency supply on the arrests in Equatorial Guinea of opposition politicians belonging to democratic parties such as the CPDS?
Hvad mener formandskabet om den demokratiske udvikling i dette land?
What is the Presidency's view on the democratisation process in Equatorial Guinea?
Hvilke foranstaltninger har Rådet truffet for at sikre, at Ækvatorialguinea respekterer de grundlæggende menneskerettigheder og de politiske rettigheder, der tilkommer de forskellige demokratiske politiske kræfter?
What action has the Council taken with a view to ensuring respect for the fundamental rights of the individual and for the political rights of the democratic political organisations in Equatorial Guinea?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0408/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0408/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Stammerådet Loya Jirga og Afghanistans fremtid
to the Council Subject: Loya Jirga and Afghanistan's future
Hvorledes vurderer Rådet processen til forberedelse af den store samling i det afghanske stammeråd Loya Jirga, og hvilke foranstaltninger har Rådet planlagt til yderligere stabilisering af dette land?
What is the Council Presidency's assessment of preparations for the Loya Jirga in Afghanistan, and what measures is it planning with a view to stabilising the country further?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0409/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0409/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Højhastighedstogstrækningen Paris-Strasbourg-München-Wien
to the Commission Subject: Paris-Strasbourg-Munich-Vienna high-speed railway
Er virkeliggørelsen af de transeuropæiske net inden for jernbanetrafikken gået helt i stå, og hvordan forholder det sig nærmere bestemt med højhastighedstogstrækningen Paris-Strasbourg-München-Wien, som med udvidelsen in mente er en prioriteret strækning?
Has the implementation of the trans-European networks come to a complete standstill as far as rail transport is concerned, and in particular what is the situation regarding the Paris-Strasbourg-Munich-Vienna high-speed railway, which is a priority in the context of enlargement?
Er det sikret, at strækningen bliver ført via den europæiske parlamentshovedstad Strasbourg?
Is it certain that the route will pass through Strasbourg, the seat of Europe's Parliament?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0410/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0410/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Midtvejsvurdering - markedsordningen for fårekød
to the Commission Subject: Mid-term review - Sheep Regime
Under behandlingen af forslaget om revision af den fælles markedsordning for fåre- og gedekød i Europa-Parlamentet sidste efterår stillede undertegnede en række ændringsforslag, som tog sigte på at forhindre den omfattende afvandring af fårefarmere fra denne sektor.
During the passage of the review of the COM in sheepmeat and goatmeat through the European Parliament last autumn, I tabled a number of amendments which aimed to prevent the widespread exodus of sheep farmers from this sector.
Et af disse ændringsforslag, som Parlamentet vedtog, indeholdt forslag om, at "ved beregning af ekstensiveringspræmien holdes de første 15 dyreenheder af får/modergeder ude af betragtning".
One such amendment which was accepted by the Parliament proposed that 'for the purposes of calculating the extensification premium, the first 15 livestock units of ewe/she-goat shall be excluded from consideration'.
Eftersom Kommissionen under Parlamentets forhandling lovede at tage sig af dette spørgsmål i forbindelse med midtvejsvurderingen, hvilke foranstaltninger vil Kommissionen da træffe med henblik på at medtage denne stærkt ønskede bestemmelse i revisionen, hvilket vil forhindre yderligere afvandring af europæiske farmere fra fårekødssektoren?
As the Commission agreed on the record in the Parliamentary debate to deal with this issue under the mid-term review, what measures will the Commission adopt to include this much-needed provision in the review which will prevent further exodus of European farmers from the sheep sector?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0411/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0411/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Konfiskation af alkohol og tobak foretaget af Det Forenede Kongeriges toldvæsen
to the Commission Subject: Seizures of alcohol and tobacco by UK Customs and Excise
I oktober 2001 tilsendte Kommissionen Det Forenede Kongeriges regering en formel anmodning om oplysninger om dens anvendelse af EU-lovgivningen om toldafgifter på tobak og alkohol, efter at der var indgivet klage over Det Forenede Kongeriges toldvæsens strenge anvendelse af de kvantitative retningslinjer for indførsel af afgiftspligtig alkohol og tobak.
In October 2001, the Commission sent the United Kingdom Government a formal request for information about its application of EU law relating to excise duties on tobacco and alcohol, following a complaint about the rigid application by UK Customs and Excise of quantitative 'guidelines' on imports of duty-paid alcohol and tobacco.
Denne praksis har indbefattet konfiskation af ikke blot varer, men også af de køretøjer, hvori de var medbragt - ofte private biler.
Such practices have included the seizure not only of goods but also of the vehicles used to transport them - often private cars.
I december 2001 fremsendte Det Forenede Kongerige et svar.
In December 2001, the United Kingdom sent a reply.
På grundlag af de modtagne oplysninger kan Kommissionen da nu oplyse, hvilket skridt, den eventuelt agter at tage over for Det Forenede Kongerige?
On the basis of the information received, can the Commission now state what action, if any, it intends to take against the United Kingdom?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0412/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0412/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
Luigi Vinci
Luigi Vinci
til Rådet Om: PKK og "antiterrorlisten"
to the Council Subject: The PKK and the 'anti-terrorist list'
Efter at PKK den 2. maj 2002 blev medtaget på "antiterrorlisten", mener Rådet da ikke, at det gør sig medskyldig i Tyrkiets undertrykkelsespolitik, såvel militært som politisk, mod hele det tyrkiske folk?
Would the Council not agree that, by including the PKK in the 'anti-terrorist list' on 2 May 2002, it became a party to the Turkish policy of military and police repression against the whole of the Kurdish people?
Hvilke initiativer agter Rådet at tage med henblik på genoptagelse af fredsprocessen i Tyrkiet, og især med hvilke samtalepartnere?
What steps does the Council intend to take to get the peace process in Turkey back on the rails and, in particular, who will be involved in the discussions?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0413/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0413/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Den kurdiske befolkning og "antiterrorlisten"
to the Commission Subject: The Kurdish people and the 'anti-terrorist list'
Mener Kommissionen ikke, at Den Europæiske Union ved at opførte PKK på "antiterrorlisten" i forordning (EF) 2580/2001 således tager ansvaret for, at man opgiver at forsøge at nå frem til en fredelig og politisk forhandlingsløsning i det "kurdiske spørgsmål" og bliver medskyldig i den tyrkiske undertrykkelsespolitik mod hele det tyrkiske folk?
Would the Commission not agree that, by including the PKK in the 'anti-terrorist list' provided for in Regulation (EC) 2580/2001 , the European Union can be seen as responsible for putting an end to efforts to find a negotiated, peaceful and political solution to the Kurdish question and becoming a party to the policy of military repression which Turkey is pursuing against the entire Kurdish people?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0414/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0414/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Den Europæiske Union, PKK og Tyrkiet
to the Council Subject: The European Union, the PKK and Turkey
Efter at PKK er blevet medtaget på listen over terrororganisationer i henhold til forordning (EF) 2580/2001 , hvorledes agter Rådet da at lægge pres på Tyrkiet med henblik på at opnå overholdelse af det kurdiske folks grundlæggende rettigheder?
Having included the PKK in the list of terrorist organisations provided for in Regulation (EC) 2580/2001 , how does the Council intend to exert pressure on Turkey with a view to ensuring that respect is shown for the fundamental rights of the Kurdish people?
Eller agter Rådet at støtte og billige Tyrkiets politik til udryddelse af det tyrkiske folk?
Or is it its intention to promote and sponsor the Turkish policy of exterminating the Kurdish people?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0415/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0415/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: PKK og det kurdiske folk
to the Commission Subject: The PKK and the Kurdish people
Hvad er de praktiske indvirkninger af PKK's optagelse på antiterrorlisten i henhold til forordning (EF) 2580/2001 ?
What are the practical repercussions of the PKK's inclusion in the 'anti-terrorist list' provided for in Regulation (EC) 2580/2001 ?
Hvordan agter Kommissionen at sikre, at Tyrkiet viser behørig respekt for det kurdiske folks rettigheder?
How does the Commission intend to ensure that Turkey shows due respect for the rights of the Kurdish people?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0416/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0416/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
Fausto Bertinotti
Fausto Bertinotti
til Rådet Om: Tyrkiet og PKK/KADEK og "antiterrorlisten"
to the Council Subject: Turkey, the PKK/KADEK and the 'anti-terrorist list'
Ved at sætte PKK på antiterrorlisten har Rådet objektivt set givet sin opbakning til den tyrkiske politik med krænkelse af det kurdiske folks rettigheder.
By including the PKK in the 'anti-terrorist list', the Council has in effect fallen into line behind the Turkish policy of denying the rights of the Kurdish people.
Hvilke skridt agter Rådet umiddelbart at tage for at sikre, at Tyrkiet viser behørig respekt for det kurdiske folks grundlæggende rettigheder i overensstemmelse med det store antal internationale traktater om menneskerettighederne og folkenes rettigheder?
What immediate steps does the Council intend to take to ensure that Turkey shows due respect for the fundamental rights of the Kurdish people in accordance with the large number of international instruments dealing with human rights and the rights of peoples?
Er Rådet ikke enig i, at det burde støtte afholdelsen af en international konference om det kurdiske spørgsmål?
Would it not agree that it should support the holding of an international conference on the Kurdish question?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0417/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0417/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: "Antiterrorlisten", PKK og det kurdiske folks rettigheder
to the Commission Subject: The 'anti-terrorist list', the PKK and the rights of the Kurdish people
Den europæiske politik over for Tyrkiet er i stadig højere grad præget af en vis opbakning af Ankara-regeringens politiske og militære mål, som det fremgår af PKK's optagelse på antiterrorlisten.
European policy towards Turkey is increasingly based on complicity with the political and military aims of the Ankara government, as is illustrated by the PKK's inclusion in the 'anti-terrorist list'.
Efter dette sidste tiltag hvilke skridt agter Kommissionen at tage for at fremme overholdelsen af de grundlæggende rettigheder for det kurdiske folk i Tyrkiet?
Following this latest move, what steps does the Commission intend to take to promote respect for the fundamental rights of the Kurdish people in Turkey?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0418/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0418/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Fredsprocessen i Tyrkiet
to the Commission Subject: Peace process in Turkey
Efter at PKK er blevet sat på listen over terroristiske organisationer, er kurderne meget nervøse, fordi de tyrkiske myndigheder ser det som en lejlighed til at forstærke undertrykkelsen af kurderne.
After the PKK has been placed on the list of terrorist organisations, the Kurds are very anxious because the Turkish authorities see it as an opportunity to increase the oppression against the Kurds.
Kan Kommissionen redegøre for, hvem den ser som sin dialogpartner i fredsprocessen på den kurdiske side, eftersom PKK er blevet sat på listen over terroristiske organisationer?
Can the Commission explain who they see as their partner of dialogue in the peace process on the Kurdish side since the PKK has been put on the list of terrorist organisations?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0419/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juni 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0419/02 for Question Time at the part-session in June 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Buskmænd i Central-Kalahari vildtreservat, Botswana
to the Commission Subject: Bushmen of the Central Kalahari Game Reserve, Botswana
Hvilke planer har Kommissionen om at gøre EU's støtte til udviklingen af Botswanas nationalparker betinget af en garanti for ejendomsret til jorden til buskmændene i Central-Kalahari vildtreservat?
What plans does the Commission have to make EU support for the development of Botswana's national parks conditional on a guarantee of land ownership rights for the Bushmen in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve?