natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ifølge Amnesty International er løftet om menneskerettighedsreformer ikke blevet opfyldt i Indonesien, og krænkelser af menneskerettighederne fortsætter i provinserne Papua og Aceh.
According to Amnesty International, the promise of human rights reform has not been realised in Indonesia and human rights violations continue to be carried out in the provinces of Papua and Aceh.
Det hævdes, at den nye regering har vist sig uvillig til at drage personer, der gør sig skyldige i krænkelser af menneskerettighederne, til ansvar for deres handlinger, herunder personer, som mistænkes for at have begået forbrydelser mod menneskeheden og andre alvorlige forbrydelser i Østtimor i 1999.
It is claimed that the new government has demonstrated a reluctance to hold perpetrators of human rights violations to account, including those suspected of committing crimes against humanity and other serious crimes in East Timor in 1999.
Amnesty International har også anmodet FN's Menneskerettighedskommission om at gøre sin indflydelse gældende for at lægge pres på Indonesien til at få det til at tage presserende skridt til sikring af, at retssagerne vedrørende alvorlige forbrydelser begået i Østtimor i 1999, som finder sted i Jakarta, lever op til internationale standarder for retfærdig rettergang.
It has also called on the UN Commission on Human Rights to use its influence to pressure Indonesia to take urgent steps to ensure that the trials of serious crimes committed in East Timor in 1999 which are taking place in Jakarta meet with international fair trials standards.
Dette skal sikre, at retssagerne ikke slår fejl på grund af manglende grundlæggende garantier.
This is to ensure that the trials do not fail because basic safeguards have not been put in place.
Hvis retssagerne ikke er troværdige, vil straffrihed blive yderligere befæstet.
If the trials are not credible, impunity will be further entrenched.
Vil Rådet nu fremsætte en erklæring om Amnesty International's beretninger, og agter det at rejse disse spørgsmål over for den indonesiske regering?
Will the Council now make a statement on the reports of Amnesty International and does it intend to raise these issues with the Indonesian Government?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0512/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0512/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Sellafield og nukleart brændsel som risikofaktor i togkollision
to the Council Subject: Sellafield and nuclear fuel train collision
Driften af Sellafield-anlægget giver vedvarende anledning til berettiget bekymring i den irske befolkning, og for nylig blev det meddelt, at en lastvogn den 11. juni 2002 var kollideret med et tog i en jernbaneoverskæring i nærheden af Ashford Kent, mens toget var undervejs for at afhente brugt nukleart brændsel fra Dungeness-atomkraftværket - en sådan ulykke burde aldrig være sket: vil Rådet på denne baggrund presse på for, at der gennemføres en undersøgelse af denne foruroligende hændelse, og kan Rådet tilslutte sig den opfattelse, at den forestående afskibning af endnu en ladning plutonium fra Japan med kurs mod Sellafield må give anledning til alvorlig bekymring, navnlig i lyset af den terrortrussel, som alle medlemsstater har forpligtet sig til at bekæmpe?
Given the on-going and legitimate concern of the Irish people about the operations of Sellafield and the news that on 11 June 2002 a heavy-goods lorry collided with a train on a level crossing near Ashford, Kent, on its way to collect used nuclear fuel from Dungeness nuclear plant, an accident that should never have happened, will the Council press for an inquiry into this alarming incident and does it agree that the imminent departure from Japan of yet another shipment of plutonium bound for Sellafield is a serious cause of concern, particularly in the light of the terrorism threat which all Member States are committed to tackling?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0513/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0513/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Aftale med Den Tjekkiske Republik om traditionelle tilberedningsmåder
to the Commission Subject: Agreement concluded with the Czech Republic concerning traditional recipes
I de tjekkiske medier verserer stadig beretninger, hvorefter den yderst populære pølsespecialitet "Utopenec" (en pølse, der marineres i et glas med eddike, paprika og løg og spises efterhånden, og som i restauranter ind imellem også opbevares i et lukket glas) og den traditionelle snapsebrændingsmetode i forbindelse med den berømte Slivovitz fra Mähren vil blive forbudt efter Den Tjekkiske Republiks tiltrædelse af EU.
Reports continue to appear in the Czech media that 'Utopenec' (an extremely popular sausage speciality which consists of a sausage pickled in a glass jar with vinegar, paprika and onions, consumed slice by slice, and which is also available in restaurants, where it is kept in an airtight glass jar) and the traditional method of distillation used in the making of the famous Moravian plum brandy 'Slivovitz' would have to be prohibited in the event of Czech accession to the EU.
Har EU i mellemtiden truffet aftaler med Den Tjekkiske Republik om bevarelse af disse traditionelle tilberedningsmåder, og hvor langt er man nået i forhandlingerne?
Has the EU already concluded agreements with the Czech Republic with a view to saving these traditional recipes, or what stage have the negotiations reached?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0514/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0514/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Schengen og lægemidler
to the Commission Subject: Schengen and medicines
I henhold til artikel 75 i gennemførelseskonventionen til Schengen-aftalen skal rejsende kunne bevise, at den medicin, de medfører, er til eget brug.
Under Article 75 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, travellers must be able to produce a certificate showing that any medicines they are carrying are for their own use.
Dette bevis skal dog kun gælde i 30 dage, og derfor må der kun medføres medicin til 30 dages forbrug.
However, this certification may be valid for no more than 30 days, so it is only possible to carry medicine for 30 days with one while travelling.
Det kan opfattes som en hindring af den frie bevægelighed for personer, at der kræves et bevis fra personer, der er afhængige af medicin.
It could be regarded as an obstacle to the freedom of movement of persons that people dependent on medicines are required to produce a certificate.
Er det Kommissionens hensigt, at dette skal være sådan, og, i benægtende fald, hvad agter den at gøre herved?
Is it the Commission's intention that this should be so, and if not, what does the Commission propose to do about it?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0515/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0515/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Børnearbejde i produktionen af sportsudstyr
to the Commission Subject: Child labour in the production of sports equipment
SPØRGSMÅL H-0516/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0516/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Erklæringer fra Lord Hannay, den britiske udsending i forbindelse med Cypern-spørgsmålet
to the Council Subject: Statements by Lord Hannay, British special envoy for Cyprus
Den britiske udsending i forbindelse med Cypern-spørgsmålet, Lord Hannay, talte i et interview i CNN-Turk om skabelsen af to separate stater, der skulle have en central regering med begrænsede beføjelser, som skulle oprettes ved opløsning af den nuværende stat og grundlæggelse af en helt anden slags stat, der skulle træde i stedet.
In an interview which he gave on CNN-Turk, Lord Hannay, the British special envoy for Cyprus, spoke of the creation of two co-founding states which are to have one central government, with limited responsibilities, springing from the dissolution of the current state and the creation of an entirely different state in its place.
Selvom den britiske ambassade i Ankara har forsøgt at dæmpe den opstandelse, som Lord Hannays erklæringer vakte, berørte den ikke spørgsmålet om opløsning af den nuværende og oprettelse af et helt andet land, og den accepterede tilmed hans erklæring om oprettelse af to særskilte stater.
Although the British Embassy in Ankara attempted to calm the agitation provoked by Hannay's statements, it did not comment on his observations regarding the dissolution of the present country and the creation of an entirely different one, and it also accepted his statement on the creation of two constitutive states.
SPØRGSMÅL H-0517/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0517/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: EU-støtte til det multinationale selskab Bacardi
to the Commission Subject: EU aid to the Bacardi multinational company
Det fremgår af en version af Kommissionens projekt vedrørende et integreret udviklingsprogram for romsektoren i Caribien (AIDCO.03/NN D(2001) 35453), at selskabet Bacardi vil kunne modtage EUF-støtte til faglig uddannelse og miljøbeskyttelse.
It is stated in one version of the Commission's draft integrated development programme for the rum industry in the Caribbean (AIDCO.03/NN D(2001) 35453) that the Bacardi company could be considered eligible for EDF aid under the headings of technical training and environmental protection.
Eftersom EU er involveret i en verserende tvist i WTO på baggrund af netop dette multinationale selskabs adfærd, og eftersom selskabet udøver en permanent lobbyvirksomhed til fordel for USA's ekstraterritoriale love, kan Kommissionen da garantere, at den nævnte version af projektet er forældet, og at Barcardi hverken direkte eller indirekte vil få adgang til EU-midler?
In view of the fact that the EU has a complaint under examination by the WTO concerning the activities of this multinational, which has, in addition, been engaging in permanent lobbying in support of US extraterritorial legislation, can the Commission confirm that the above-mentioned version of the draft programme is now obsolete and that Bacardi will not be either a direct or an indirect beneficiary of EU monies?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0518/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0518/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Optagelse af nye medlemslande
to the Council Subject: Accession of new Member States
Kan Rådet udelukke, at de første nye medlemslande af Den Europæiske Union ikke først bliver optaget i 2005 eller senere?
Can the Council rule out the possibility that the first new accessions to the European Union will take place only in 2005 or later?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0519/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0519/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Optagelse af nye medlemslande
to the Commission Subject: Accession of new Member States
Kan Kommissionen udelukke, at de første nye medlemslande af Den Europæiske Union ikke først bliver optaget i 2005 eller senere?
Can the Commission rule out the possibility that the first new accessions to the European Union will take place only in 2005 or later?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0520/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0520/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: Statskuppet i Venezuela og EU's reaktion
to the Council Subject: EU reaction to Venezuela coup
Få timer efter det statskup, som den 12. april blev begået i Venezuela mod de demokratiske institutioner (præsident, parlament og domstole), udsendte EU's formandskab et officielt kommuniké, hvori man bl.a. gav udtryk for tillid til, at overgangsregeringen ville respektere de demokratiske værdier og institutioner, således at man kunne overvinde den aktuelle krise på grundlag af national konsensus og under fuld overholdelse af de grundlæggende rettigheder og friheder.
On 12 April 2002, only a few hours after the coup in Venezuela against the democratic institutions (the presidency, the parliament and the legal apparatus), the EU Presidency issued an official statement in which reference was made, inter alia, to the EU's trust that the transitional government would respect democratic values and the democratic institutions in such a way as to ensure that the present crisis would be overcome within a framework of national harmony and on the basis of full respect for fundamental rights and freedoms.
Tog EU dette skridt efter samråd med USA?
Was there an agreement on the matter between the EU and the US?
Skete det efter samråd med de øvrige EU-lande?
Were the other EU Member States involved?
Var kommunikeet godkendt af de øvrige EU-lande?
Was this statement approved by the other EU Member States?
Hvad agter EU fremover at gøre for at støtte institutionerne og stabiliteten samt fremme udviklingen og de programmer for bekæmpelse af sociale skævheder, som den venezuelanske regering har iværksat?
What action will the EU take in future to support the institutions, stability and development, and the programmes to fight social inequalities which have been launched by the Government of Venezuela?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0521/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0521/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Hver dag dør 24.000 mennesker af sult på verdensplan
to the Commission Subject: 24,000 people die of hunger every day across the world
De oplysninger, der for nylig blev forelagt under FN-konferencen om sult, har vakt rædsel.
The recent statistics presented at the UN world food summit are horrifying.
Otte hundrede millioner mennesker på jorden lider sult, og hver dag dør over 24.000 af disse mennesker af sult.
Across the world, 800 million people are starving and over 24,000 of them are dying every day of starvation.
Det er tallene for de officielt registrerede ofre for sult, medens den gennemsnitlige amerikaner årligt forbruger samme mængde føde som 300 indbyggere i Afrika.
These figures represent the officially recorded victims of hunger, while the average American consumes annually as much food as 300 people in Africa.
Bag "velfærdssamfundets" facade gemmer der sig imidlertid sultende og tiggere, som leder efter madrester for at stille deres sult i storbyerne i de industrialiserede lande.
However, the facade of the 'prosperous society' conceals starving people and beggars searching through rubbish in order to appease their hunger in the metropolises of developed countries.
Dette er den barbariske verden, som "den nye orden" og globaliseringen har skabt.
This is the barbaric world created by the 'new order' and globalisation.
I betragtning af, at situationen i EU ikke er bedre, hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen da at træffe for at bekæmpe sulten i verden og imødegå fænomenet med nødlidende mennesker, der tigger eller roder i affald i storbyerne i medlemslandene?
In view of the fact that the situation in the EU itself is no better, what measures does the Commission intend to take to combat global hunger and to rid the metropolises of its Member States of the sight of wretched people begging or sifting through rubbish?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0522/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0522/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Afskaffelse af forlystelsesspil
to the Commission Subject: Ban on amusement machines
Det græske parlament har fået forelagt et forslag om at indføre forbud mod spil, som tager sigte på fuldstændig afskaffelse af samtlige elektriske, elektromekaniske og elektroniske forlystelsesspil.
A bill concerning a ban on game machines has been put before the Greek Parliament, which makes provision for a complete ban on electric, electro-mechanical and electronic amusement machines.
Er et totalforbud mod elektriske, elektromekaniske og elektroniske spil, der teknisk set ikke kan konverteres til elektroniske hasardspil, i overensstemmelse med EF-traktatens artikel 49 og 50 om fri udveksling af tjenesteydelser, artikel 43 og 45 om etableringsfrihed samt med artikel 28, der vedrører frie varebevægelser?
Is a complete ban on electric, electro-mechanical and electronic amusement machines which technically cannot be converted into electronic gambling machines compatible with Articles 49 and 50 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, regarding freedom to provide services, Articles 43 and 45 enshrining the right to freedom of establishment, and Article 28 of the Treaty concerning the free movement of products?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0523/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i juli 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0523/02 for Question Time at the part-session in July 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: UMTS/G3-nettet
to the Commission Subject: The UMTS/3G network
Man er netop nu ved at implementere udbygningen af UMTS/G3-nettet.
The extension of the UMTS/3G network is currently being implemented.
For at projekterne skal give gevinst, er det nødvendigt, at udbygningen foregår nogenlunde parallelt over hele EU's indre marked, ellers vil aktører med virksomhed i flere lande miste de fordele, den globale UMTS/G3-standard kan give.
In order for the project to be profitable, an extension needs to take place to some extent in parallel throughout the whole EU internal market, otherwise operators doing business in several countries will lose the advantages which the global UMTS standard has to offer.
En forudsætning for, at markedsaktørerne tør investere i den infrastruktur, en udbygning af UMTS/G3 kræver, er, at der findes en fælles strategi på EU-plan for at gennemføre de reguleringer, der nu findes, f.eks. tiltrædelsesdirektivet.
One precondition for operators on the market to risk investment in the infrastructure which an extension of UMTS/3G requires is that there should be a common strategy at EU level for the implementation of the regulations currently in force, e.g. the Access Directive.
EU mangler i dag en sådan strategi, hvilket bevirker, at medlemsstaterne går fremad i meget ujævn takt, og at aktørerne tøver med at fortsætte.
The EU currently lacks such a strategy, which means that the Member States are moving at a very different rate and operators hesitate to make any further progress.
Der er blevet efterlyst en situationsrapport, men dette er ikke tilstrækkeligt.
A report of the current situation has been requested, but that is not enough.
Planlægger Kommissionen nogle konkrete foranstaltninger for at fremme og lette medlemsstaternes udbygning af UMTS/G3 under den igangværende implementering?
Is the Commission planning to take any concrete measures to encourage and facilitate the Member States' extension of the UMTS/3G network in the course of this implementation?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0524/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0524/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Rådet Om: EU-charteret om grundliggende rettigheder og en stramning af udlændingepolitikken i en række EU-lande
to the Council Subject: Charter of EU Fundamental Rights and a tightening up of aliens policy in various Member States of the EU
Regeringer i hele EU strammer udlændingepolitikken og indfører stadig flere hindringer for asylansøgere som f.eks. stramning af familiesammenføringen, hvor der kræves store garantisummer, forhøjelsen af minimumsalderen for ægteskab til 24 år, udvisning af børn, der er født af forældre, som illegalt er rejst ind i landet, obligatorisk bevis på, at man vil finde arbejde, eller begrænsningen i retten for indvandreres forældre til at bo hos deres børn.
Governments throughout the EU are tightening up their aliens policy and creating more and more obstacles to asylum-seekers, for example: tightening up family reunification provisions, with those concerned being required to deposit large amounts of money as a guarantee, an increase in the minimum age for marriage to 24, expulsion of children born to parents who entered the country illegally, the obligation on immigrants to prove that they have a job to go to, and restrictions on the right of immigrants' parents to come and live with their children.
De nævnte foranstaltninger er en regelret krænkelse af EU's charter om grundliggende rettigheder.
The measures referred to above constitute a downright violation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Kan Rådet oplyse, om den er enig i, at ovenstående, i Fællesskabet vedtagne, foranstaltninger faktisk er i strid med ånden i bl.a. artikel 7, 9, 15, stk. 3, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 29, 33, 34, 41 og 47 i nævnte charter, og er det rede til at bekæmpe dette, ifald det ønskes?
Can the Council indicate whether or not it agrees that the measures referred to above and implemented by the Member States do indeed constitute a breach of the spirit of, inter alia, Articles 7, 9, 15(3), 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 29, 33, 34, 41 and 47 of the said Charter, and it is prepared, where appropriate, to intervene?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0525/02 til spørgetiden under mødeperioden i september I 2002 jf. forretningsordenens artikel 43 af
ORAL QUESTION H-0525/02 for Question Time at the part-session in September I 2002 pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure by
til Kommissionen Om: Forbedring af europæiske bestemmelser for bilforsikringer på det indre marked
to the Commission Subject: Refinement of the rules governing motor-vehicle insurance in the internal market
I begyndelsen af juni forelagde kommissionsmedlem Bolkestein et forslag til direktiv, der skal forbedre de eksisterende fire direktiver om bilforsikringer.
In early June, Commissioner Bolkestein presented a proposal for a directive designed to refine the four existing directives relating to motor-vehicle insurance.
Som følge af de tidligere EU-direktiver og efter gentagne opfordringer fra kommissionsmedlemmet med ansvar for det indre marked blev det såkaldte 'bonus-malus'-system afskaffet i Belgien.
As a result of the previous directives, and in response to repeated calls from the Commissioner with special responsibility for the internal market, what is known as the 'bonus-malus' system was abolished in Belgium.
Dermed forsvandt tarifaftalerne mellem de forskellige belgiske forsikringsselskaber.
That also spelt the end of the agreements on premiums concluded among the various Belgian insurers.
Muligheden for frit at kunne fastsætte taksterne er utvivlsomt til fordel for gode bilister.
The possibility of being able freely to determine premiums undoubtedly constitutes good news for good drivers.
På den anden siden vil den store forskel, som allerede nu består inden for de forskellige segmenter snarere stige end falde.
On the other hand, this will also increase rather than decrease the serious tensions caused by fragmentation.
Resultatet heraf er, at der eventuelt vil være flere uforsikrede trafikanter.
The result thereof is the likelihood that we shall find more and more uninsured vehicles on our roads.