natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finder Rådet, at artikel 4 i protokol nr. 4 til den europæiske konvention til beskyttelse af menneskerettigheder og grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder og artikel 19, stk. 1, i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder, som blev ratificeret på topmødet i Nice, er blevet overholdt?
Does the Council consider that Article 4 of Protocol No 4 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the first paragraph of Article 19 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as ratified at the Nice Summit, have been respected?
Finder Rådet, at samme artikel 19, stk. 2, i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder er blevet overholdt over for de ivorianere, som er blevet bortvist til et land, hvor der i øjeblikket er uroligheder, og at procedurerne for ansøgning om asyl, der sikres ved Genève-konventionen af 28. juli 1951 og protokollen af 31. januar 1967 vedrørende flygtninges retsstilling, er blevet overholdt?
Does the Council consider that the second paragraph of the same Article 19 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights has been respected with regard to the Ivorians rejected to a country currently in a situation of unrest and that the asylum procedures guaranteed by the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 and the protocol of 31 January 1967 relating to the status of refugees have been respected?
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Rådet at træffe for at sikre, at traktaterne, navnlig bestemmelserne om asylret og beskyttelse, overholdes i tilfælde af udsendelse, udvisning og udlevering?
What measures does the Council intend to take to ensure that the treaties, in particular the provisions thereof on the right of asylum and protection against removal, expulsion and extradition, are respected?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0174/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0174/03
Finder Kommissionen, at artikel 4 i protokol nr. 4 til den europæiske konvention til beskyttelse af menneskerettigheder og grundlæggende frihedsrettigheder og artikel 19, stk. 1, i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder, som blev ratificeret på topmødet i Nice, er blevet overholdt?
Does the Commission consider that Article 4 of Protocol No 4 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the first paragraph of Article 19 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as ratified at the Nice Summit, have been respected?
Finder Kommissionen, at samme artikel 19, stk. 2, i Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder er blevet overholdt over for de ivorianere, som er blevet bortvist til et land, hvor der i øjeblikket er uroligheder, og at procedurerne for ansøgning om asyl, der sikres ved Genève-konventionen af 28. juli 1951 og protokollen af 31. januar 1967 vedrørende flygtninges retsstilling, er blevet overholdt?
Does the Commission consider that the second paragraph of the same Article 19 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights has been respected with regard to the Ivorians rejected to a country currently in a situation of unrest and that the asylum procedures guaranteed by the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 and the protocol of 31 January 1967 relating to the status of refugees have been respected?
Hvilke foranstaltninger agter Kommissionen at træffe for at sikre, at traktaterne, navnlig bestemmelserne om asylret og beskyttelse, overholdes i tilfælde af udsendelse, udvisning og udlevering?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to ensure that the treaties, in particular the provisions thereof on the right of asylum and protection against removal, expulsion and extradition, are respected?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0175/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0175/03
Er Rådet af den opfattelse, at afskaffelsen af toldpræferencerne (med EU's vedtagelse af forslag til Rådets forordning (KOM/2003/0045 endelig) om iværksættelse af artikel 12 i forordning (EF) 2501/2001 ) for levende planter, blomster, frugt og grøntsager fra Colombia ved anvendelse af gradueringsordningen vil hjælpe et land med omkring 26 millioner fattige, ca. 30.000 voldelige dødsfald om året og omkring 10 bortførelser om dagen i dets kamp mod narkotikafremstilling og -handel?
Does the Council take the view that abolishing tariff preferences (through the adoption by the EC of proposal (COM/2003/0045 final) for a Council regulation implementing Article 12 of Council Regulation (EC) 2501/2001 ) for the sector live plants, flowers, edible vegetables and fruit in Colombia, as a consequence of applying the graduation mechanism, will help a country in which there are around 26 million people living in poverty, almost 30 000 violent deaths each year and around 10 kidnappings per day, in its fight against drug production and trafficking?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0176/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0176/03
Er Kommissionen af den opfattelse, at afskaffelsen af toldpræferencerne (med EU's vedtagelse af forslag til Rådets forordning (KOM/2003/0045 endelig) om iværksættelse af artikel 12 i forordning (EF) 2501/2001 ) for levende planter, blomster, frugt og grøntsager fra Colombia ved anvendelse af gradueringsordningen vil hjælpe et land med omkring 26 millioner fattige, ca. 30.000 voldelige dødsfald om året og omkring 10 bortførelser om dagen i dets kamp mod narkotikafremstilling og -handel?
Does the Commission take the view that abolishing tariff preferences (through the adoption by the EC of proposal (COM/2003/0045 final) for a Council regulation implementing Article 12 of Council Regulation (EC) 2501/2001 ) for the sector live plants, flowers, edible vegetables and fruit in Colombia, as a consequence of applying the graduation mechanism, will help a country in which there are around 26 million people living in poverty, almost 30 000 violent deaths each year and around 10 kidnappings per day, in its fight against drug production and trafficking?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0177/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0177/03
Om: Er kendskabet til hotline telefonnumre tilstrækkeligt udbredt i offentligheden?
Subject: Are hotline numbers known sufficiently to the public ?
Kommissionen har fået penge af budgetmyndigheden, så den kan opfordre alle medlemsstaterne til at offentliggøre hotline telefonnumre, som man kan ringe til, når man støder på ubehageligt materiale på internettet.
The Commission has been given money by the Budgetary Authority to encourage all Member States to publicise hotline numbers for use by the public when they encounter unpleasant material on the Internet.
Er Kommissionen inderst inde tilfreds med, at disse telefonnumre kun kendes af en meget lille del af offentligheden?
Is the Commission satisfied - looking deep into its heart for the truth - that these numbers are known to anything more than a tiny minority of the public?
Hvornår tror Kommissionen, at kendskabet til disse nyttige numre vil blive tilstrækkeligt udbredt?
When does it believe that these useful numbers will become sufficiently widely known?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0178/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0178/03
Om: Diskriminering af udenlandske sproglærere: fortsættelse
Subject: Discrimination against foreign language lecturers: continued
Under henvisning til Kommissionens svar på mit spørgsmål ( H-0088/03 ), som var lidt mere imødekommende end svaret på mit foregående spørgsmål ( H-0796/02 ), ser det ud til at man i Italien på grund af bestemte italienske universiteters adfærd i alvorlig grad stadig undlader at efterleve retsprincipperne gennem fuld og rettidig overholdelse af domme, hvorved personer, der ikke er italienske statsborgere, og som arbejder som lærere ved disse italienske universiteter, stadig bliver alvorligt diskriminerede.
Having regard to the Commission's reply to my question ( H-0088/03 ) which gave a slightly more forthcoming answer than the reply to my previous question ( H-0796/02 ), it appears that a serious and continuing failure to uphold the rule of law by ensuring full and timely observance of Court judgments is prevailing in the Italian state owing to the conduct of certain Italian universities, to the continuing severe detriment of non-Italian nationals holding teaching jobs in these universities.
Vil Kommissionen på baggrund heraf udvide sine undersøgelser og gøre Italien opmærksom på, at det overtræder artikel 6 i traktaten om Den Europæiske Union?
This being so, will the Commission therefore extend its inquiries and advise the Italian state that it is in breach of Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union?
Hvis dette ikke er tilfældet, vil Kommissionen da venligst forklare, i hvilken henseende – om nogen – den er af den opfattelse, at Italien, for så vidt angår de involverede EU-borgere, opfylder minimumskravene i retsprincipperne?
If not, will the Commission please state in what, if any, respect it considers that, with regard to the European citizens affected, Italy is observing minimal requirements of the rule of law.
Skriftligt svar af 11.3.2003.
Written answer of 11.3.2003.
SPØRGSMÅL H-0179/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0179/03
Om: Hormonforstyrrende stoffer og testmetoder
Subject: Endocrine disrupting chemicals and test methods
Europa-Parlamentet opfordrede i sin beslutning af 26. oktober 2000 Kommissionen til at anvende forsigtighedsprincippet i forbindelse med hormonforstyrrende stoffer.
In its opinion of 26 October 2000 , Parliament called on the Commission to apply the cautionary principle in relation to endocrine disrupting chemicals.
I følge KOM/2001/0262 endelig "... kan der kun lovgives med henblik på at beskytte mennesker og miljø mod risikoen ved hormonforstyrrende stoffer, hvis der findes anerkendte teststrategier/metoder til kortlægning og vurdering af disse stoffer".
According to COM/2001/0262 final: 'The availability of agreed test strategies/methods to identify and assess endocrine disrupting chemicals is a basic requirement for comprehensive legislative action aimed at protecting people and the environment from the potential dangers posed by these chemicals.'
På den baggrund bedes Kommissionen redegøre for resultaterne af arbejdet i EDTA og samtidig bekræfte, at hormonforstyrrende stoffer vil blive omfattet af den nye kemikalielovgivning på lige fod med andre farlige stoffer.
Against this background, will the Commission provide details of the results of the EDTA's work and will it confirm that endocrine disrupters will be covered by the legislation on chemicals on a par with other hazardous substances?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0180/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0180/03
Om: Direktivet om dyretransporter
Subject: Animal transport directive
Hvornår vil Kommissionen offentliggøre forslag til forbedring af dyrs velfærd under transport mellem medlemsstaterne?
When will the Commission publish proposals to improve the welfare of animals transported between Member States?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0181/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0181/03
Om: USA spionerer i FN
Subject: US spying in the United Nations
Det lød for nyligt i pressen, at USA havde ført en aggressiv overvågningsaktion i FN’s Sikkerhedsråd i forbindelse med den seneste Irak-krise.
Recent reports in the media have claimed that the USA had carried out an aggressive surveillance operation in the United Nations Security Council during the recent crisis over Iraq.
Anser Rådet disse forlydender for værende troværdige?
Does the Council accept these reports as being valid?
Hvilke skridt vil Rådet i bekræftende fald tage for at påtale dette over for USA?
If so, what steps will the Council take to reprimand the USA for this action?
Har Rådet kendskab til, om USA har gjort nogen forsøg på at spionere i EU's medlemsstater?
Is the Council aware of any US attempts to spy on EU Member States?
Hvilke skridt vil Rådet tage for at sikre, at kommunikationer i medlemsstaterne forbliver private?
What steps will the Council take to ensure that Member States communications are private?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0182/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0182/03
Om: Midtvejsrevision af den fælles landbrugspolitik
Subject: Mid-Term Review of Common Agriculture Policy
Hvilke foranstaltninger vil der indgå i midtvejsrevisionen af den fælles landbrugspolitik for at sikre støtteberettigelse for jordejere, der har været omfattet af ordningen for støtte til førtidspensionering i landbruget i årene 2000, 2001 og 2002, og hvis jord som følge deraf er blevet bortforpagtet?
What provision will there be in the Mid-Term Review of Common Agriculture Policy to ensure payment entitlements for landowners who have been on the Farm Retirement Scheme during the years 2000, 2001 and 2002 and consequently whose land has been leased?
Er det hensigten med midtvejsrevisionen at diskvalificere sådanne landbofamilier for fremtidig støtteberettigelse?
Is it the intention in the Mid-Term Review to disqualify such farm families from future payment entitlements under the MTR?
Hvem vil være støtteberettiget for jorder, hvortil der er fastsat støtte i årene 2000, 2001 og 2002, men som er blevet solgt efter den 1.1.2003: (a) ejeren fra 2000-2002, (b) den efterfølgende køber (en udøvende landmand), (c) ingen af dem?
Who will be eligible to claim the payment entitlement on land for which payment entitlement has been established during the years 2000, 2001, 2002 but which has subsequently been sold since 1.1.2003: (a) the owner from 2000 to 2002, (b) the subsequent purchaser (an active farmer), (c) neither?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0183/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0183/03
Om: Evakuering af Kommissionens delegationskontorer
Subject: Evacuation of Commission delegations' offices
Hvilke planer har Kommissionen iværksat for at være forberedt til eventuelle evakueringer af dets delegationer rundt om i verdens brændpunkter?
What plans has the Commission set in motion in preparation for the possible evacuation of its delegations from flashpoints around the world?
Er samtlige ansatte på delegationerne omfattet af evakueringsplanerne eller skelnes der efter ansættelsesform?
Are all delegation employees covered by the evacuation plans or is a distinction made according to form of employment?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0184/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0184/03
Om: Strukturfonde på Korsika
Subject: Structural Funds in Corsica
I 1999 mistede Korsika retten til støtte fra strukturfondene under mål 1.
In 1999, Corsica lost its eligibility for aid from the Structural Funds as an Objective 1 region.
I dag erkender de officielle franske instanser, der er ansvarlige for statistikkerne (INSEE), at de tal, der er anvendt som basis for beregningen, var forkerte.
Now, however, the French national statistical office (INSEE) has admitted that the figures which it used as the basis for the relevant calculations were incorrect.
Eurostat har netop offentliggjort det reelle tal for Korsika i 2000, nemlig 75 % af EU’s BNP og ikke 82 %, som den franske stat hidtil har hævdet.
Eurostat recently published the true figure for Corsica for 2000 which shows that it had 75% of average Community GNP and not 82%, as the French authorities had claimed hitherto.
I betragtning af, at mål 1 koncentrerer størstedelen af den europæiske strukturstøtte om de mindst udviklede regioner, har fejlen vedrørende Korsika svækket øens økonomi betydeligt.
Given that Objective 1 concentrates the bulk of European structural aid on the least-developed regions, the error affecting Corsica has cost the island’s economy a significant amount in loss of revenue.
Kan Kommissionen sætte tal på denne forskydning?
Can the Commission put a figure on that loss?
Agter Kommissionen at anmode den franske stat om forklaringer?
Does the Commission intend to seek an explanation from the French authorities for the discrepancy?
Kan der blive tale om erstatning, såfremt fejlen bekræftes af Kommissionen?
If the Commission were to establish that an error had indeed been made, could a claim for compensation be lodged?
Hvor store erstatninger kunne der blive tale om?
What would be the amount of such compensation?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0185/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0185/03
Om: Grønbogen om offentlige tjenester/tjenester af almen interesse
Subject: Green Paper on Public Services/Services of General Interest
Vil Kommissionen venligst bekendtgøre den forventede udgivelsesdato for sin grønbog om offentlige tjenester/tjenester af almen interesse, og vil den ligeledes oplyse, hvilke foranstaltninger den har truffet eller vil træffe for at lette høringen om denne sag?
Will the Commission please announce the expected publication date for its Green Paper on Public Services/Services of General Interest and provide details on the measures it has/will put in place to facilitate consultation on this matter?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0186/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0186/03
Om: Den nye version af Baker-planen for Vestsahara
Subject: New version of the Baker plan for Western Sahara
I henhold til den nye version af James Bakers plan for en løsning af konflikten i Vestsahara, som for nylig blev forelagt for parterne, skal der afholdes valg i området i løbet af et år, og en folkeafstemning om selvstyre senest fem år efter, at parterne måtte have undertegnet aftalen.
The new version of the James Baker plan for a solution to the Western Sahara conflict, recently presented to the parties, makes provision for the holding of autonomous elections within one year, and a referendum on self-determination no later than five years after any agreement has been signed by the parties.
Ifølge planen skal der anvendes to forskellige folketællinger.
This plan envisages two different electoral registers for the two votes.
For den første afstemnings vedkommende godkendes FN's folketælling, der fandt sted med henblik på folkeafstemningen om selvstyre, men med henblik på den definitive afstemning er der behov for en ny folketælling, som skal omfatte de marokkanske kolonister, der ikke er blevet accepteret af Minurso under dennes tiårige arbejde med at identificere de valgberettigede.
The initial elections are to be based on the list drawn up by the UN for the referendum on self-determination, but a modified list is to be imposed for the final election, which is to include the Moroccan settlers who have not been accepted by Minurso in over 10 years of identifying voters.
Hvad er Rådets holdning til James Bakers forslag?
What is the Council's position on this proposal by Mr Baker?
Hvilke foranstaltninger anser det for hensigtsmæssigt for at kunne overholde den af FN gennemførte folketælling?
What measures does it consider appropriate in order to respect the list drawn up by the UN?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0187/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0187/03
Om: Drab på babysæler/sælunger ved Hvidehavet, Rusland
Subject: Slaughter of baby seal pups in the White Sea, Russia
I svaret på mit foregående spørgsmål ( H-0046/03 ) opfordrede Kommissionen mig til at levere konkrete og pålidelige beviser, der bekræfter, at de russiske myndigheder i stort omfang subventionerer drabene på babysæler/sælunger i Hvidehavet.
In its reply to my previous question ( H-0046/03 ), the Commission invited me to provide ‘concrete and reliable information’ confirming that the Russian authorities are heavily subsidising the killing of baby seal pups on the White Sea.
Kommissionen bedes bemærke, at jeg nu har leveret disse informationer i skriftlig form ledsaget af beviser på de blodige drab på video.
Will the Commission please note that I have now supplied this information to the Commission, in written form, accompanied by video evidence of the bloody slaughter itself.
Det er helt indlysende, at russerne subventionerer denne skandaløse aktivitet i form af frie fangstkvoter.
It is abundantly clear that the Russians are subsidising this outrageous activity by means of free fish quotas.
I et tidligere svar lovede Kommissionen, at man i underudvalget om miljø under partnerskabs- og samarbejdsaftalen ville tage spørgsmålet om drabene på babysæler op med de russiske myndigheder, og den oplyste samtidigt, at man håbede, at det næste møde i dette underudvalg om miljø ville blive holdt i slutningen af marts eller i begyndelsen af april.
In its previous answer, the Commission promised that it would raise the matter of the killing of baby seals with the Russian authorities in the Subcommittee on Environment under the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, and stated that it was hoped that the next meeting of this Subcommittee would be held at the end of March or the beginning of April.
Vil Kommissionen venligst oplyse præcist, hvornår dette møde vil blive holdt?
Will the Commission please now state precisely when the meeting will be held?
Skriftligt svar af 11.2.2003.
Written answer, 11.2.2003
SPØRGSMÅL H-0188/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0188/03
Om: Indsættelse af spansk olietankskib i krigen mod Irak
Subject: Sending of a Spanish single-hull tanker to the Iraq war
Den spanske regering har besluttet at indsætte det militære olietankskib Marqués de la Ensenada som støtte for de allierede tropper i krigen mod Irak.
The Spanish Government has decided to send the military oil tanker Marqués de la Ensenada to support the allied troops engaged in the Iraq war.
Marqués de la Ensenada er et enkeltskroget olietankskib, der blev bygget i 1990.
The Marques de la Ensenada is a single-hull tanker and was built in 1990.
Agter Kommissionen at anmode de spanske myndigheder om at trække dette enkeltskrogede olietankskib ud af konfliktområdet for at undgå risiko for ny olieforurening?
Will the Commission ask the Spanish authorities to withdraw the single-hull tanker from the conflict zone in order to avert the risk of a fresh black tide?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0189/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0189/03
Om: Forhandlingerne om en landbrugsaftale med Marokko
Subject: Negotiation of the agricultural agreement with Morocco
Marokko virker ikke særlig interesseret i at indgå en ny aftale om landbrugsprodukter med EU.
Morocco does not appear particularly keen to enter into a new agricultural agreement with the European Union.
Såfremt parterne ikke når til enighed inden den kommende tomathøstperiode, kan der opstå nye spændinger i forhold til dette land som følge af forskellig fortolkning af bestemmelsen om frivillig begrænsning af marokkanske leverancer.
Failure by both sides to reach an agreement before the next tomato season could generate tensions with this country owing to the differences in the way the voluntary restraint clause on Moroccan exports is interpreted.
Hvorledes påtænker EU at undgå sådanne spændinger?
How will the European Union avert such tensions?
Mener man ikke, at Rabat på baggrund af Marokkos ønske om at indgå en frihandelsaftale med EU, kunne forsøge at vinde tid for senere - efter afslutningen af forhandlingerne med EU - at råde over endnu et pressionsinstrument til at opnå indrømmelser til skade for de udpræget grøntsagsproducerende sydlige områder af EU, som lider under den manglende afklaring og den lidet kontrollerede konkurrence?
In the light of Morocco’s intention to establish a free trade area with the United States, does the Commission not think that Rabat might be trying to buy time so that later on, once the negotiations with the United States bear fruit, it has an extra lever with which to extract more substantial concessions from the EU, to the detriment of the regions of southern Europe geared to market gardening and adversely affected by this context of uncertainty and barely controlled competition?
Hvilke foranstaltninger påtænker man på baggrund af den usikkerhed, som denne situation skaber, at træffe til fordel for disse områder?
In view of the uncertainties created by this situation, what action will be taken in support of these regions?
SPØRGSMÅL H-0190/03
ORAL QUESTION H-0190/03
Om: Begrundelse for optagelse af paraquat på bilag til rådsdirektiv
Subject: Justification for including Paraquat in the annex to a Council directive
Plantebeskyttelsesmidlet paraquat består af et persistent kemisk stof, som er akut giftigt, og som der ikke findes modgift for.
The weedkiller Paraquat is made from a persistent, acutely toxic chemical for which there is no antidote.
Paraquat er farligt for såvel mennesker som for naturen og er forbudt i en række forskellige lande, herunder Sverige, Danmark og Østrig.
Paraquat is dangerous both to people and to the environment, and is banned in a variety of countries including Sweden, Denmark and Austria.
Det diskuteres i øjeblikket, om paraquat skal optages på bilag 1 til Rådets direktiv 91/414/EØF om plantebeskyttelsesmidler.
There is currently a debate on the possibility of including Paraquat in Annex 1 to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market.
Kommissionen selv foreslår, at det optages.
The Commission itself has proposed that it be included.