natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Til stede under afstemningen var: Graham R. Watson (formand og ordfører), Robert J.E. Evans og Bernd Posselt (næstformænd), Michael Cashman, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Carmen Cerdeira Morterero (for Adeline Hazan), Ozan Ceyhun, Carlos Coelho, Gérard M.J. Deprez, Giuseppe Di Lello Finuoli, Andrew Nicholas Duff (for Baroness Sarah Ludford, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 153, stk. 2), Pernille Frahm, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen (for Martin Schulz), Jorge Salvador Hernández Mollar, Ruth Hieronymi (for Thierry Cornillet, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 153, stk. 2) Anna Karamanou, Margot Keßler, Eva Klamt, Jean Lambert (for Alima Boumediene-Thiery), Lucio Manisco (for Fodé Sylla), Juan Andrès Naranjo Escobar (for Marcello Dell'Utri), Hartmut Nassauer, Elena Ornella Paciotti, Neil Parish (for Timothy Kirkhope, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 153, stk. 2) Paolo Pastorelli, Hubert Pirker, Ingo Schmitt (for Daniel J. Hannan), Patsy Sörensen, Joke Swiebel, Anna Terrón i Cusí, Anne E.M. Van Lancker (for Sérgio Sousa Pinto), Gianni Vattimo, Christian Ulrik von Boetticher og Jan-Kees Wiebenga.
The following were present for the vote: Graham R. Watson, chairman and rapporteur; Robert J.E. Evans and Bernd Posselt, vice-chairmen; Michael Cashman, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Carmen Cerdeira Morterero (for Adeline Hazan), Ozan Ceyhun, Carlos Coelho, Gérard M.J. Deprez, Giuseppe Di Lello Finuoli, Andrew Nicholas Duff (for Baroness Sarah Ludford pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Pernille Frahm, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen (for Martin Schulz), Jorge Salvador Hernández Mollar, Ruth Hieronymi (for Thierry Cornillet pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Anna Karamanou, Margot Keßler, Eva Klamt, Jean Lambert (for Alima Boumediene-Thiery), Lucio Manisco (for Fodé Sylla), Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar (for Marcello Dell'Utri), Hartmut Nassauer, Elena Ornella Paciotti, Neil Parish (for Timothy Kirkhope pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Paolo Pastorelli, Hubert Pirker, Ingo Schmitt (for Daniel J. Hannan), Patsy Sörensen, Joke Swiebel, Anna Terrón i Cusí, Anne E.M. Van Lancker (for Sérgio Sousa Pinto), Gianni Vattimo, Christian Ulrik von Boetticher and Jan-Kees Wiebenga.
Udtalelserne fra Udvalget om Udenrigsanliggender, Menneskerettigheder, Fælles Sikkerhed og Forsvarspolitik og Udvalget om Kvinders Rettigheder og Lige Muligheder er vedføjet denne betænkning.
The opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy and the Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities are attached.
Budgetudvalget vedtog den 23. november 2000 ikke at afgive udtalelse; Udvalget om Retlige Anliggender og det Indre Marked vedtog den 22. november 2000 ikke at afgive udtalelse.
The Committee on Budgets decided on 23 November 2000 that it would not deliver an opinion; the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market decided on 22 November 2000 that it would not deliver an opinion.
Betænkningen indgivet den 31. august 2001.
The report was tabled on 31 August 2001.
FORSLAG TIL RETSAKT Forslag til Rådets direktiv om minimumsstandarder for procedurer i medlemsstaterne for tildeling og fratagelse af flygtningestatus ( KOM(2000) 578 – C5-0705/2000 – 2000/0238(CNS))
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL Proposal for a Council directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status ( COM(2000) 578 – C5‑0705/2000 – 2000/0238(CNS))
Forslaget ændret som følger:
The proposal is amended as follows:
Ændringsforslag Ændringsforslag 1 Titel
Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Title
Rådets direktiv om minimumsstandarder for procedurer i medlemsstaterne for tildeling og fratagelse af flygtningestatus
Council Directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status.
Rådets direktiv om minimumsstandarder for procedurer i medlemsstaterne for anerkendelse og fratagelse af flygtningestatus
Council Directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for recognising and withdrawing refugee status.
Det gøres i UNHCR's håndbog klart, at stater ikke tildeler, men anerkender flygtningestatus.
The UNHCR handbook makes clear that States do not grant refugee status but they recognise it.
Ændringsforslag 2 Betragtning 9
Amendment 2 Recital 9
(9) På den anden side bør medlemsstaterne med henblik på at opnå et system, der muliggør hurtig anerkendelse af ansøgere med behov for beskyttelse som flygtninge, jf. Genève-konventionens artikel 1, litra A), have mulighed for at benytte specifikke procedurer for behandling af ansøgninger, hvis konkrete omstændigheder der ikke er behov for at vurdere, og ansøgninger, som de mistænker for at være åbenbart grundløse.
(9) On the other hand, in the interests of a system of swift recognition of those applicants in need of protection as refugees within the meaning of Article 1(A) of the Geneva Convention, provision should be made for Member States to operate specific procedures for processing applications for which it is not necessary to consider the substance and those that are suspected to be manifestly unfounded
(9) På den anden side bør medlemsstaterne med henblik på at opnå et system, der muliggør hurtig anerkendelse af ansøgere med behov for beskyttelse som flygtninge, jf. Genève-konventionens artikel 1, litra A), have mulighed for at benytte specifikke procedurer for behandling af ansøgninger, hvis konkrete omstændigheder der ikke er behov for at vurdere, og ansøgninger, som de mistænker for at være åbenbart grundløse , i henhold til klare og forud fastlagte kriterier.
(9) On the other hand, in the interests of a system of swift recognition of those applicants in need of protection as refugees within the meaning of Article 1(A) of the Geneva Convention, provision should be made for Member States to operate specific procedures for processing applications for which it is not necessary to consider the substance and those that are suspected to be manifestly unfounded , in accordance with criteria which have been clearly laid down in advance.
Der bør fastlægges præcise regler for at undgå vilkårlighed i forbindelse med afslag på ansøgninger.
Precise rules must be laid down to ensure that applications are not rejected arbitrarily.
Ændringsforslag 3 Betragtning 10
Amendment 3 Recital(10)
(10) Medlemsstaterne kan frit afgøre, om de vil benytte sådanne procedurer for uantagelige og åbenbart grundløse ansøgninger, men hvis de gør det, bør de overholde de fælles standarder for definitionen af sådanne sager og de øvrige betingelser for anvendelse af procedurerne, herunder de frister for beslutningsprocessen, der er fastsat i dette direktiv.
(10) Member States are at liberty to decide whether or not to operate these procedures for inadmissible and manifestly unfounded cases, but if they do, they should abide by the common standards laid down in this Directive as regards the definition of these cases and the other requirements to apply the procedures, including time-limits for the decision-making process.
Denne betragtning består udelukkende af gentagelser eller af et resumé af teksten i direktivforslaget.
This recital consists exclusively of a repetition or summary of the substantive text of the proposal for a directive.
Der er imidlertid intet behov herfor, især da dels resuméet og dels unøjagtige formuleringer kan give anledning til unødvendige irritationsmomenter og misforståelser.
There is no need for this, particularly as the combination of this summarisation, on the one hand, and imprecise wording on the other give rise to confusion and misunderstandings.
Ændringsforslag 4 Betragtning 11
Amendment 4 Recital 11
(11) Det er af afgørende betydning, at disse procedurer omfatter de sikkerhedsforanstaltninger, der er nødvendige for at fjerne tidligere tvivl, således at de personer, der har behov for beskyttelse, stadig kan blive identificeret korrekt.
(11) It is essential that these procedures contain the necessary safeguards to ensure that earlier doubts can be set aside so that those who are in need of protection can still be correctly identified.
De bør derfor i princippet så vidt muligt omfatte de samme proceduremæssige minimumsgarantier for og –krav med hensyn til beslutningsprocessen som almindelige procedurer .
In so far as is possible, they should therefore contain, in principle, the same minimum procedural guarantees and requirements regarding the decision‑making process as regular procedures.
På grund af de pågældende sagers karakter kan og bør beslutningstagningen dog prioriteres i begge tilfælde, og yderligere anke kan begrænses .
However, given the nature of the cases involved, decision making can and should be prioritised in both instances and further appeal may be restricted.
De bør derfor i princippet så vidt muligt omfatte de samme proceduremæssige minimumsgarantier for og –krav med hensyn til beslutningsprocessen som almindelige procedurer.
In so far as is possible, they should therefore contain, in principle, the same minimum procedural guarantees and requirements regarding the decision‑making process as regular procedures
Det synes ikke berettiget at begrænse minimumsgarantierne til udelukkende at gælde for visse procedurer.
It is not clear why the minimum guarantees should be confined to certain procedures.
Ændringsforslag 5 Betragtning 12
Amendment 5 Recital 12
(12) Minimumsgarantierne for alle ansøgere ved alle procedurer bør blandt andet omfatte retten til en personlig samtale, inden der træffes en afgørelse, lejlighed til at kommunikere med UNHCR, lejlighed til at kontakte organisationer eller personer, der yder juridisk bistand, retten til at modtage en skriftlig afgørelse inden for de fastsatte frister og ansøgerens ret til at blive underrettet på et sprog, han forstår, om sin retlige stilling på afgørende tidspunkter i proceduren, for at han kan overveje eventuelle kommende skridt.
(12) As minimum procedural guarantees for all applicants in all procedures should be considered, inter alia , the right to a personal interview before a decision is taken, the opportunity to communicate with the UNHCR, the opportunity to contact organisations or persons that provide legal assistance, the right to a written decision within the time-limits laid down and the right of the applicant to be informed at decisive moments in the course of his procedure, in a language he understands, of his legal position in order to be able to consider possible next steps.
(12) Minimumsgarantierne for alle ansøgere ved alle procedurer bør blandt andet omfatte retten til adgang til asylproceduren, retten til en personlig samtale, inden der træffes en afgørelse, lejlighed til at kommunikere med UNHCR, lejlighed til på alle trin i proceduren at kontakte organisationer eller personer, der yder juridisk bistand, retten til at modtage en skriftlig afgørelse inden for de fastsatte frister og ansøgerens ret til at blive underrettet på et sprog, han forstår, om sin retlige stilling på afgørende tidspunkter i proceduren, for at han kan overveje eventuelle kommende skridt , samt retten til at forblive på modtagelseslandets område, indtil der er truffet en endelig afgørelse .
(12) As minimum procedural guarantees for all applicants in all procedures should be considered, inter alia , the right of access to the asylum procedure, the right to a personal interview before a decision is taken, the opportunity to communicate with the UNHCR, the opportunity to contact organisations or persons that provide legal assistance at all stages of the procedure , the right to a written decision within the time-limits laid down , the right of the applicant to be informed at decisive moments in the course of his procedure, in a language he understands, of his legal position in order to be able to consider possible next steps and the right to remain in the territory of the receiving country until a final decision has been taken .
Den 15. juni 2000 afgav Europa-Parlamentet udtalelse om Kommissionens arbejdsdokument om fælles standarder for asylprocedurer til forberedelse af dette direktiv.
On 15 June 2000 the European Parliament delivered its opinion on the Commission’s working document ‘Towards common standards for asylum procedures’, by way of preparation for this directive.
I overensstemmelse med denne udtalelse tilføjes to nye rettigheder.
Two new rights are added, in accordance with that opinion.
Ændringsforslag 6 Betragtning 13
Amendment 6 Recital 13
(13) Der bør endvidere fastsættes specifikke proceduregarantier for personer med særlige behov, f.eks. uledsagede mindreårige.
(13) In addition, specific procedural guarantees for persons with special needs, such as unaccompanied minors, should be laid down.
Ændringsforslag 7 Betragtning 15
Amendment 7 Recital 15
(15) For at give den enkelte ansøger effektiv mulighed for at følge sin sag over for medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder bør retten til anke indebære, at alle ansøgere i forbindelse med alle procedurer har mulighed for en revision af såvel sagens konkrete omstændigheder som de retlige spørgsmål, og som hovedregel bør anke have opsættende virkning med hensyn til håndhævelsen af en negativ afgørelse.
(15) In order to enable every applicant to effectively pursue his case with the competent authorities of the Member States, the right to appeal should entail for all applicants in all procedures the opportunity for a review on both facts and points of law and should as a rule suspend enforcement of an adverse decision.
(15) For at give den enkelte ansøger effektiv mulighed for at følge sin sag over for medlemsstaternes kompetente myndigheder bør retten til anke indebære, at alle ansøgere i forbindelse med alle procedurer har mulighed for en revision af såvel sagens konkrete omstændigheder som de retlige spørgsmål, og anke bør have opsættende virkning med hensyn til håndhævelsen af en negativ afgørelse.
(15) In order to enable every applicant to effectively pursue his case with the competent authorities of the Member States, the right to appeal should entail for all applicants in all procedures the opportunity for a review on both facts and points of law and should suspend enforcement of an adverse decision.
Teksten bør ikke åbne mulighed for undtagelser, som kunne betyde en alvorlig forringelse af asylansøgernes rettigheder.
The text must not allow scope for exceptions which might seriously compromise the rights of asylum-seekers.
Ændringsforslag 8 Betragtning 19
Amendment 8 Recital 19
(19) Anvendelsen af dette direktiv bør evalueres regelmæssigt.
(19) The implementation of this Directive should be evaluated at regular intervals.
(19) Anvendelsen af dette direktiv bør evalueres regelmæssigt og mindst hvert andet år .
(19) The implementation of this Directive should be evaluated at regular intervals , not exceeding 2 years .
Det er nødvendigt at fastsætte klare frister for at undgå, at evalueringen af direktivets gennemførelse kan opsættes på ubestemt tid.
It is necessary to lay down clearly deadlines which must be complied with in order to ensure that an evaluation of the implementation of the directive cannot be postponed indefinitely.
(20a) Unionen bør sikre, at dens bistandsprogrammer for de lande, der har søgt om at tiltræde Den Europæiske Union, dækker fyldestgørende uddannelses- og videreuddannelsesaktiviteter vedrørende både asyl og indvandring samt politisamarbejde og retligt samarbejde, således at ansøgerlandene kan efterleve dette direktiv.
The Union should take care that its assistance programmes for the candidate countries for accession to the EU cover sufficient education and training activities in the fields both of asylum and immigration, and police and judicial co-operation in order for them to comply with this directive.
En vellykket gennemførelse af denne lovgivning forudsætter en høj grad af kompetence i den offentlige forvaltning såvel i medlemsstaterne som i ansøgerlandene.
The successful implementation of this legislation requires a high capability of public administration in both Member States and candidate countries.
Ændringsforslag 10 Artikel 1
Amendment 10 Article 1
Formålet med dette direktiv er at fastsætte minimumsstandarder for procedurer i medlemsstaterne for tildeling og fratagelse af flygtningestatus.
The purpose of this Directive is to establish minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status.
Formålet med dette direktiv er at fastsætte minimumsstandarder for procedurer i medlemsstaterne for anerkendelse og fratagelse af flygtningestatus.
The purpose of this Directive is to establish minimum standards on procedures in Member States for recognising and withdrawing refugee status.
Det gøres i UNHCR's håndbog klart, at stater ikke tildeler, men anerkender flygtningestatus.
T he UNHCR handbook makes clear that States do not grant refugee status but they recognise it.
Den Europæiske Union er forpligtet til at overholde alle medlemsstaternes eksisterende internationale forpligtelser samt Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder, særlig artikel 18.
The European Union is committed to respecting all the existing international obligations of Member States as well as the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, especially Article 18.
Det bør understreges, at Unionen skal overholde alle eksisterende folkeretlige forpligtelser, ligesom der særskilt bør henvises til Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder, der i høj grad blev udarbejdet under hensyntagen til den fremtidige udvikling i EU's asyl- og indvandringspolitik.
The necessity to respect all existing international law commitments needs to be underscored, as well as making a specific reference to the Charter of Fundamental Rights which was drafted very much in the context of the future development of EU asylum and immigration policy.
Ændringsforslag 12 Artikel 2, litra b
Amendment 12 Article 2, paragraph (b)
b) "Asylansøgning" en anmodning fra en person om en medlemsstats beskyttelse, som kan anses for at være afgivet med den begrundelse, at vedkommende er flygtning efter Genève-konventionen artikel 1, litra A).
(b) “Application for asylum” means a request whereby a person asks for protection from a Member State and which can be understood to be on the grounds that he is a refugee within the meaning of Article 1(A) of the Geneva Convention.
Enhver anmodning fra en person om beskyttelse formodes at være en asylansøgning, medmindre vedkommende udtrykkelig anmoder om en anden form for beskyttelse, der kan søges om særskilt
Any application for protection is presumed to be an application for asylum, unless the person concerned explicitly requests another kind of protection that can be applied for separately;
b) "Asylansøgning" en anmodning fra en person om en medlemsstats beskyttelse, som kan anses for at være afgivet med den begrundelse, at vedkommende er flygtning efter Genève-konventionen artikel 1, litra A) eller efter den pågældende medlemsstats lovgivning, når der her er fastsat bestemmelser om yderligere tilfælde af anerkendelse af flygtningestatus .
(b) “Application for asylum” means a request whereby a person asks for protection from a Member State and which can be understood to be on the grounds that he is a refugee within the meaning of Article 1(A) of the Geneva Convention or within the meaning of the legislation of the Member State where the latter provides for further cases of recognition of refugee status .
Når der i medlemsstaterne er fastsat mere liberale kriterier (sammenlignet med Genève-konventionen) for anerkendelse af flygtningestatus, ville det være absurd at begrænse direktivets anvendelse til visse flygtninge.
Where Member States operate broader criteria (than the Geneva Convention) for recognition of refugee status, it would be nonsensical to confine the scope of the Directive to certain refugees.
Ændringsforslag 13 Artikel 2, litra i
Amendment 13 Article 2, paragraph (i)
i) " Flygtningestatus " den status , en medlemsstat tildeler en person, der er flygtning, og som får adgang til denne medlemsstats område som sådan.
(i) "Refugee Status" means the status granted by a Member State to a person who is a refugee and is admitted as such to the territory of that Member State;
i) " Asyl " den beskyttelse , en medlemsstat tildeler en person, der er flygtning, og som får adgang til denne medlemsstats område som sådan.
(i) "Asylum" means the protection granted by a Member State to a person who is a refugee and is admitted as such to the territory of that Member State;
I udkastet til artikel blandes de to begreber status og asyl.
The draft article mixes the two notions of refugee status and asylum.
Ændringsforslag 14 Artikel 2, litra k a (nyt)
Amendment 14 Article 2, paragraph (k)a (new)
ka) "Ophør af flygtningestatus" den afgørelse hvormed den ansvarlige myndighed erklærer, at en persons flygtningestatus er ophørt på i henhold til artikel 1, litra C), i Genève-konventionen.
(k) a ' Cessation of refugee status' means the decision by a determining authority declaring that the refugee status of a person has come to an end on the basis of Article 1(C) of the Geneva Convention;
En person ophører med at være flygtning, så snart et af vilkårene i artikel 1, litra C), i 1951-konventionen finder anvendelse.
A person ceases to be a refugee as soon as any of the circumstances envisaged in Article 1(C) of the 1951 Convention become applicable.
Dette er forskelligt fra fratagelse af asyl, hvilket ikke nødvendigvis resulterer i ophør af flygtningestatus.
This is different from withdrawal of asylum which does not necessarily result in the termination of refugee status.
Ændringsforslag 15 Artikel 2, litra l
Amendment 15 Article 2, paragraph (l)
l) "Fratagelse af flygtningestatus " betyder en afgørelse truffet af den besluttende myndighed om at fratage en person flygtningestatus i henhold til Genève-konventionens artikel 1, litra C), eller artikel 33, stk. 2.
(l) " Withdrawal of refugee status" means the decision by a determining authority to withdraw the refugee status of a person on the basis of Article 1 (C) of the Geneva Convention or Article 33(2) of the Geneva Convention;
l) "Fratagelse af asyl " betyder en afgørelse truffet af den besluttende myndighed om at gøre en ende på asyl i henhold til Genève-konventionens artikel 32 eller artikel 33, stk. 2.
" Withdrawal of asylum " means the decision by a determining authority to put an end to asylum on the basis of Articles 32 or 33(2) of the Geneva Convention;
Asyl kan besluttes (eller fratages), og flygtningen kan udsendes fra landet.
Asylum may be determined (or withdrawn), and the refugee may be expelled from the country.
Ikke desto mindre bringer anvendelse af artikel 32 eller artikel 33, stk. 2, ikke nødvendigvis flygtningestatus til ophør.
Nevertheless, the application of Article 32 or of Article 33(2) does not necessarily bring refugee status to an end.
En flygtning, som udsendes fra et land under henvisning til den nationale sikkerhed eller den offentlige orden, kan nyde godt af flygtningestatus i et tredjeland, som er villigt til at modtage ham eller hende.
A refugee who is expelled from one country on grounds of national security or public order may continue to enjoy refugee status in a third country which is willing to receive him or her.
Ændringsforslag 16 Artikel 3, stk. 3
Amendment 16 Article 3, paragraph 3
Medlemsstaterne kan beslutte at anvende bestemmelserne i dette direktiv på procedurer for behandling af ansøgninger om andre former for beskyttelse end den, der følger af Genève-konventionen, for personer, som ikke kan betragtes som flygtninge.
Member States may decide to apply the provisions of this Directive to procedures for deciding on applications for kinds of protection other than that emanating from the Geneva Convention for persons who are found not to be refugees.