natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
50. opfordrer medlemsstaterne til at sørge for, at personer ikke udleveres til lande, hvor de risikerer dødsstraf for deres forbrydelser, og hvor de risikerer at blive tortureret eller mishandlet, og til ikke at acceptere nogen form for garantier, der ikke er bindende; opfordrer ligeledes medlemsstaterne til ikke at udhule denne ret ved hjælp af bilaterale aftaler;
Calls on the Member States to ensure that people are not extradited to countries where they risk the death penalty for their offences or where they risk being tortured or maltreated and not to accept any non-binding guarantees; calls, further, on the Member States not to undermine this right through bilateral agreements;
Kapitel 3: Ligestilling
Chapter 3: Equality
57. opfordrer Kommissionen til på kort sigt at fremsætte et direktivforslag om ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder uden for beskæftigelsessfæren og forelægge dette for Rådet og Parlamentet;
Calls on the Commission to finalise as soon as possible its proposal for a directive on equal treatment for men and women outside the employment sphere and to submit it to the Council and Parliament;
Racisme og fremmedhad
Racism and xenophobia
61. er bekymret over de stadig flere og hyppige tilfælde af antisemitisme og opfordrer medlemsstaterne til at lægge mere vægt på rapportering og forebyggelse og forfølgning af de skyldige;
Expresses concern at the rising number and increasing violence of acts of anti-Semitism and calls on the Member States to pay greater attention to detecting and preventing such offences and prosecuting the perpetrators;
Kulturel, religiøs og sproglig mangfoldighed
Cultural, religious and linguistic diversity
66. henstiller til Belgien, Grækenland, Irland og Portugal, at de undertegner det europæiske charter om regionale sprog og mindretalssprog; finder det glædeligt, at Østrig, Spanien og Det Forenede Kongerige har undertegnet dette charter i 2001, og opfordrer Belgien, Frankrig, Grækenland, Italien, Irland, Luxembourg og Portugal til at gøre det samme;
Urges Belgium, Greece, Ireland and Portugal to sign the European Charter for regional or minority languages; welcomes the fact that Austria, Spain and the United Kingdom ratified the Charter in 2001 and calls on Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, Ireland, Luxembourg and Portugal to do likewise;
Ligestilling mellem mænd og kvinder
Equality between men and women
75. minder om, at menneskehandel oftest er handel med kvinder, hvilket navnlig hænger sammen med kvinders manglende økonomiske uafhængighed og forskelsbehandling af disse på arbejdsmarkedet; opfordrer medlemsstaterne til at erkende denne kønsspecifikke dimension og til at undgå forveksling med menneskesmugling;
Draws attention to the fact that trafficking in human beings largely involves trafficking in women and is linked in particular to women's lack of economic independence and discrimination on the labour market; invites the Member States to continue to recognise this gender-specific dimension and to be careful not to confuse it with the smuggling of human beings;
77. henstiller til Frankrig at ophæve forskellen i minimumsalderen for ægteskab for piger og drenge (henholdsvis 15 og 18 år);
Calls on France to abolish the difference in the minimum age for marriage for young women and men (15 and 18 years of age respectively);
Forskelsbehandling på grundlag af seksuel orientering
Discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation
Børns rettigheder
Rights of the Child
Beskyttelse mod forskelsbehandling på grund af alder
Protection against discrimination on the ground of age
Handicappedes rettigheder
Rights of disabled people
Kapitel 4: Solidaritet
Chapter 4: Solidarity
102. gør opmærksom på, at Ministerkomitéen under socialpagten i 56 tilfælde har konstateret, at medlemsstaterne har overtrådt socialpagtens bestemmelser om børnearbejde, moderskabsbeskyttelse og tredjelandsstatsborgeres adgang til arbejdsmarkedet;
Points out that the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has established 56 cases of violations by the Member States of the provisions of the European Social Charter in the fields of child labour, maternity protection and the access of foreigners to the labour market;
Kapitel 5: Borgerskab
Chapter 5: Citizenship
Stemmeret ved kommunale valg og valg til Europa-Parlamentet
Right to vote in local and European elections
114. anerkender handicappedes universelle ret til adgang til alle valgprocessens aspekter, hvilket støttes af den internationale handicapbevægelse, International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES) og International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA); opfordrer medlemsstaterne til at gennemføre denne rettighed i praksis;
Recognises the universal right of people with disabilities to have access to all aspects of the electoral process, as promoted by the international disability movement, the International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES), and the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), and calls on the Member States to make this right a reality;
116. henstiller til medlemsstaterne at udbrede valgret og valgbarhed ved kommunale valg og valg til Europa-Parlamentet til alle borgere fra tredjelande, der har opholdt sig lovligt i Den Europæiske Union i mindst tre år;
Calls on the Member States to extend the right to vote and stand for election in local and European elections to all citizens of non-member countries who have been legally resident in the European Union for at least three years;
Fri bevægelighed og opholdsret
Freedom of movement and residence
Kapitel 6: Retspleje
Chapter 6: Administration of justice
135. pålægger sin formand at sende denne beslutning til Rådet og Kommissionen samt til De Europæiske Fællesskabers Domstol, Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol, Den Europæiske Ombudsmand, Europarådet og regeringer og parlamenter i medlemsstaterne og kandidatlandene.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, the European Court of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, the European Ombudsman, the Council of Europe, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the applicant countries.
BEGRUNDELSE INDLEDNING A. Vejen til en menneskerettighedspolitik for Den Europæiske Union
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT INTRODUCTION A. Towards an EU human rights policy
Europa-Parlamentet (EP) har gennem årene tildelt sig selv en særlig rolle i forbindelse med fremme og beskyttelse af menneskerettighederne - en rolle, der også har givet anledning til - ikke altid uberettiget - kritik.
Over the years, the European Parliament has taken on a particular role in promoting and protecting human rights - a role that has often given rise to criticism that is not always unfounded.
Således er det blevet hævdet, at smukke udtalelser om menneskerettighederne har skullet kompensere for EP's mangel på virkelig politisk vægt.
It has been pointed out that fine declarations on human rights are used to compensate for Parliament's lack of any real political weight.
Efter Amsterdam-traktatens ikrafttræden bør der være mindre anledning til at omtale EP's menneskerettighedsudtalelser på denne måde.
Since the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, there should be less reason to talk about Parliament's human rights activities in these terms.
Menneskerettighederne er jo nu i højere grad blevet integreret i traktaterne, og også EP's kompetence er øget.
Human rights have now been written into the treaties more clearly, and the powers of the EP have also been strengthened.
Desuden har Den Europæiske Unions charter om grundlæggende rettigheder styrket dette arbejdes politiske legitimitet og i højere grad angivet retning og fokus.
Furthermore, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union has enhanced the political legitimacy of this action and given it greater focus and direction.
Dette fremgår desuden af den beslutning EP's Udvalg om Borgernes Friheder og Rettigheder og Retlige og Indre Anliggender sidste år traf om at gøre dette charter til ledetråd for den årlige betænkning om menneskerettighederne i EU.
This is also evident from the decision taken last year by Parliament's Committee on Citizens' Freedoms, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) to use the Charter as a guideline for the annual report on the human rights situation in the EU.
Men der er stadig betragtelig uklarhed og uenighed om, præcis hvad EP's opgave er eller bør være i forbindelse med menneskerettigheder, og navnlig om hvilken rolle EP's årlige betænkning skal spille.
Nonetheless, there is still a considerable degree of confusion and difference of opinion as to what exactly the EP's task is or should be in relation to human rights and, more particularly, on the role of the EP's annual reports.
Den kritik, to væsentlige ngo'er fremsatte ved årets indledning, er en medvirkende årsag til, at ordføreren tager dette spørgsmål op på ny.
The criticism expressed early this year by two leading NGOs should, in my view, prompt us to put this question back on the agenda.
A critical assessment of the European Parliament's 2002 human rights reports, Amnesty International and the International Federation for Human Rights, 21 March 2002.
A critical assessment of the European Parliament's 2002 human rights reports, Amnesty International and the International Federation for Human Rights, 21 March 2002.
Det er ordførerens opfattelse, at EP's rolle på menneskerettighedsområdet er en del af og følger af de politiske opgaver, det har inden for komplekset af EU-institutioner.
As I see it, Parliament's role in the area of human rights is part of, and derives from, the political functions it already has to fulfil within the EU institutional system.
Dette er indlysende, hvor der er tale om EP's opgave som medlovgiver, om dets rolle i Unionens budgetprocedure og om dets ret til at godkende traktater med tredjelande og om nye medlemsstaters tiltrædelse til Unionen.
This is obvious when we are talking about the co-legislative role of the EP and its role in the budgetary procedure of the Union or its right of assent to agreements with non-member countries and the accession of new Member States to the Union itself.
Her udgør menneskerettighedsovervejelser en del af de politiske afvejninger, EP må foretage inden for rammerne af sine formelle opgaver.
In these spheres, human rights considerations are part of the political assessment that the EP has to make within the framework of its formal tasks.
Men hvilken rolle spiller den årlige betænkning om menneskerettighederne i denne forbindelse?
But how should this be seen within the context of the annual reports on human rights?
Efter ordførerens mening træder EP her frem i sin tilsynsførende og kontrollerende rolle, hvor det stiller Rådet og Kommissionen til ansvar for den politik, disse institutioner har ført på menneskerettighedsområdet.
In my view, the EP primarily plays a monitoring and scrutinising role, with the Council and Commission being held accountable for the human rights policies that they have pursued.
I dette billede passer det også ind, at indsamling af data, overvågning og redegørelse for politikken i første række henhører under Rådets og/eller Kommissionens ansvar, og at de pågældende redegørelser i EP formelt må sættes på dagsordenen og gøres til genstand for drøftelser og politisk meningsdannelse.
This approach would also cover information-gathering, monitoring and reporting, which should primarily be carried out on the responsibility of the Council and/or Commission, and would allow the relevant reports to be formally placed on Parliament’s agenda and the subject of discussion and political opinion forming.
EP's overvågning skal ikke være et selvstændigt element, men en hjælp i forbindelse med denne kontrollerende funktion.
Monitoring by the EP should not be seen as a task in itself but as a way of enabling it to carry out its role of scrutiny.
Nu er en ny praksis ved at opstå og vinde fodfæste.
In the meantime, another practice is in danger of becoming established.
Rådet har nu offentliggjort tre årlige betænkninger om menneskerettighederne i EU Rådet (almindelige anliggender); European Union Annual Report on Human Rights 1999, first annual report af 11.10.99 (se http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/human_rights/doc/report_99_en.pdf ), European Union Annual Report on Human Rights 2000, second annual report af 09.10.00 (se http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/human_rights/doc/report_00_en.pdf ), European Union Annual Report on Human Rights 2001, third annual report af 8.10.01 (se http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/human_rights/doc/report_01_en.pdf ) . , navnlig af beskrivende art og navnlig viet udenrigspolitikken.
The Council has now produced three annual reports General Affairs Council; European Union Annual Report on Human Rights 1999, first annual report of 11.10.99 (See http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/human_rights/doc/report_99_en.pdf ), European Union Annual Report on Human Rights 2000, second annual report of 09.10.00 (See http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/human_rights/doc/report_00_en.pdf ), European Union Annual Report on Human Rights 2001, third annual report of 8.10.01 (See http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/human_rights/doc/report_01_en.pdf ) . on human rights, which are mainly of a descriptive nature focusing on external policy.
Disse er imidlertid ikke som sådan blevet sat formelt på EP's dagsorden; Udvalget om Udenrigsanliggender, Menneskerettigheder, Fælles Sikkerhed og Forsvarspolitik (AFET) fortsætter med at udarbejde egne initiativbetænkninger.
However, these reports are not formally placed on Parliament's agenda, and the EP Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (AFET) is going ahead and drawing up its own-initiative reports.
For så vidt angår EU's interne menneskerettighedspolitik, savnes der tilsvarende beretninger fra Kommissionen.
As far as internal EU human rights policy is concerned, there is no such reporting by the Council or Commission.
Sidste år begyndte EP's Udvalg om Borgernes Friheder og Rettigheder og Retlige og Indre Anliggender selv at samle data og varetage overvågning, idet chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder tjente som basis.
Last year, Parliament's LIBE Committee began data collection and monitoring, taking the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a starting point.
Dette førte til den misforståelse, at EP ensidigt påtog sig at overvåge medlemsstaternes gennemførelse af chartret, selv om dette som bekendt endnu ikke rummer bindende ret, og chartrets bestemmelser kun er rettet til Unionens institutioner og organer og til medlemsstaterne "dog kun når de gennemfører EU-retten (chartret, artikel 51).
This action soon created the false impression that the EP was unilaterally assuming authority for implementation of the Charter in the Member States, although it is common knowledge that, for the time being, the Charter has no binding legal force and, in addition, the provisions of the Charter are directed at the institutions and bodies of the Union and the Member States, 'only when they are implementing EU law' (Charter, Article 51).
Efter ordførerens opfattelse bør EP på dette stadium og med henblik på den årlige betænkning kun benytte chartret som politisk rettesnor og indholdsmæssigt holdepunkt.
In my opinion, Parliament should, at this stage and for the purposes of its annual reports, merely use the Charter as a political guideline and as a point of departure for the contents of its reports.
This will take into account developments in national legislation, the case law of constitutional courts and Member State jurisdictions, as well as the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and the European Court of Human Rights.
This will take into account developments in national legislation, the case law of constitutional courts and Member State jurisdictions, as well as the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and the European Court of Human Rights.
The tasks of this network will be the production of a written report summarizing the situation of fundamental rights in the context of both European Union law and national legal orders, as well as the organization of two annual meetings with the Commission and the Parliament.
The tasks of this network will be the production of a written report summarizing the situation of fundamental rights in the context of both European Union law and national legal orders, as well as the organization of two annual meetings with the Commission and the Parliament.
In addition, the network must assist the Commission and the Parliament by giving advice on documents submitted to them and specific information on the protection of fundamental rights . .
In addition, the network must assist the Commission and the Parliament by giving advice on documents submitted to them and specific information on the protection of fundamental rights .
Dette netværk blev oprettet den 16. oktober 2002 og har allerede påbegyndt sit arbejde.
That Network was established on 16 October 2002 and has already begun work.
Det forekommer vigtigt, at dette netværk primært beskæftiger sig med etablering af standardiserede metoder til indsamling og analyse af information som en betingelse for en mere transparent håndtering af overvågning og evaluering.
I feel it is important that this Network should focus first of all on devising standardised methods of gathering and analysing information as a way of ensuring a more transparent approach to monitoring and evaluation.
Sondringen mellem dels menneskerettighedspolitikken inden for rammerne af EU's optræden udadtil og dels i EU og i medlemsstaterne selv rummer problemer i denne forbindelse.
The existing difference between, on the one hand, human rights policy in the framework of the EU's external action and, on the other, in the EU and the Member States themselves is a major difficulty.
Kun når indenrigspolitik og udenrigspolitik udviser sammenhæng og er konsistente, kan EU som sådan være troværdig.
Only if internal and external policies are coordinated and consistent will the EU itself become credible.
Dette gælder også for forholdene inden for EP, hvor koordineringen mellem Udenrigsudvalget og Udvalget for Udviklingssamarbejde på den ene side og Udvalget om Borgernes Friheder og Rettigheder på den anden side er svær at se.
This also applies to relations within the EP, where coordination between the AFET Committee and the Committee on Development and Cooperation (DEVE), on the one hand, and the LIBE Committee, on the other, is far from evident.
Det er dog ikke sådan, at ordføreren er den første, der ser disse mangler.
I am not the first person to draw attention to these shortcomings.
Det er allerede tidligere forsøgt at skabe mere klarhed og at formulere tydeligere opgaver.
Efforts have been made in the past to clarify the situation and formulate clearer terms of reference.
Se http://www.iue.it/AEL/events.htm , Human Rights Agenda for the European Union for the Year 2000.
See http://www.iue.it/AEL/events.htm , Human Rights Agenda for the European Union for the Year 2000.
Disse henstillinger var baseret på den omfattende afsluttende rapport, der var udarbejdet af Philip Alston og J.H.H. Weiler.
These recommendations were taken further in the Final report by Philip Alston and J.H.H. Weiler, the essence of which was a call for greater coherence between internal and external policy, an improvement in quality and a strengthening of the role of providing information.
Essensen i dette opråb var et forsvar for sammenhæng mellem indenrigs- og udenrigspolitik, forbedring af kvaliteten og styrkelse af informationsindsamlingens rolle.
In the declaration to mark the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, on 10 December 1998 the European Council took up this challenge and put a number of matters of the agenda, although these were still formulated in rather weak terms.
I erklæringen, der blev fremsat i forbindelse med 50-års-dagen for verdenserklæringen om menneskerettighederne, tog Det Europæiske Råd den 10. december 1998 denne udfordring op og satte en række sager - omend forsigtigt formuleret - på dagsordenen Se http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/human_rights/doc/50th_decl_98.htm . .
See http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/human_rights/doc/50th_decl_98.htm .
Nogle af henstillingerne er nu (af Rådet og Kommissionen) helt eller delvis gennemført, som f.eks. en årsrapport fra Rådet og et ngo-forum, andre er derimod aldrig blevet taget op, som f.eks. ønsket om et kommissionsmedlem med ansvar for menneskerettigheder, eller er direkte blevet forkastet, som f.eks. ønsker om oprettelse af et EU-agentur for overvågning af menneskerettighederne.
Some of these recommendations have since been implemented wholly or in part (by the Commission and Council), for example an annual report by the Council and an NGO Forum, but others have never met with any response, for instance the call for a Commissioner with special responsibility for human rights, or are regularly rejected, such as the question of establishing an EU 'Human Rights Monitoring Agency'.
Parlamentet har ved flere lejligheder udtalt sig om dette sidstnævnte forslag, men det ser ud som om EP i den forbindelse tog dette op.
Parliament has taken a stance on the last point on a number of occasions, but it appears to have focused on this single issue.
EP har aldrig beskæftiget sig med rapporten som sådan.
The report as such has never been taken up by Parliament.
Hovedbudskabet, som komiteen af vismænd rettede til Parlamentet i 1998: styrkelse af ekspertisen, bedre intern koordinering og en mere målrettet indfaldsvinkel i dialogen med Kommissionen og Rådet, blev ikke hørt.
The main message that the Committee of Wise Men addressed to Parliament in 1998 was to ensure greater expertise, improved internal coordination and a more targeted approach in its dialogue with the Commission and Council, but it has never been acted upon.
Under forberedelserne til en ny kommissionsstruktur i den efterfølgende valgperiode (1999-2004) spillede det i hvert fald ingen mærkbar rolle.
In the preparations for a new committee structure for the following parliamentary term (1999‑2004), it certainly played no significant role.
Nu er der så gået næsten tre år.
We are now almost three years down the line.
Det er nødvendigt at gøre status over en række hovedpunkter i EP's menneskerettighedspolitik.
It is time to take stock of a number of important aspects of EU human rights policy.
Hvordan går det?
What is the current state of affairs?
Hvilke anbefalede forbedringer er gennemført, og hvilke venter stadig på passende opfølgning?
Which recommendations for improvements have been put into effect, and which still need to be followed up?
Ved at besvare disse spørgsmål kan vi skabe en ramme, der angiver retningen for denne betænkning.
Only by answering these questions can we create a framework that will give direction to the current report.
På baggrund af den måde, hvorpå den samlede Kommission sammensættes og de af medlemsstaternes politiske interesser, der bliver berørt i den forbindelse, er en sådan portefølje med tværgående kompetence for meget af bede om.
This is hardly surprising; given the way in which the College of Commissioners is formed and the political interests of the Member States that come into play, it would be asking too much for a portfolio of this kind with a far-reaching remit to be created.
Kritikken af, at EU's menneskerettighedspolitik mangler lederskab og profil på kommissionsplan, forekommer måske nu forældet.
The complaint that the Commission's EU human rights policy lacks leadership and profile now seems to have been rectified to some extent.
Flere kommissionsmedlemmer profilerer sig nu på dette område.
A number of Commissioners are now seeking the limelight on human rights issues.
Men politikken er stadig opdelt og fragmenteret og spiller ofte kun en marginal rolle i beslutningsprocessen.
However, policy is still splintered and fragmented, and human rights frequently still play a marginal role in decision-making.