natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I øvrigt er begrebet "hjemsted" i treårsrapporten knyttet uløseligt sammen med det faste sekretariat.
Furthermore, in the three-year report, the concept of seat is indissociably linked to that of the permanent secretariat.
Således nævner bestyrelsen i denne rapport blandt de større vanskeligheder, den har måttet kæmpe med, "mangelen på en fast adresse for sekretariatet, som kunne gøre Cepols identitet mere synlig" Se punkt 2.1, litra c, i nævnte rapport. .
Thus, in the report, the governing board lists among the major difficulties that it has had to deal with ‘the lack of a permanent seat to accommodate the Secretariat and to enable the development of a more obvious CEPOL identity’ Report mentioned above, I.2.1(c). .
Det er tænkeligt, at man ved en fejltagelse har glemt at stryge den næstsidste sætning i artikel 4, men selv om det ikke skulle være tilfældet, kan ordføreren fuldt ud tilslutte sig synlighedsargumenterne i treårsrapporten og foreslår derfor, at det faste sekretariat under alle omstændigheder etableres på det sted, der er valgt som Cepols hjemsted.
It may be that the sentence before last in Article 4(1) has not been deleted owing to an oversight but, even if that is not the case, your rapporteur fully supports the visibility arguments in the three-year report and suggests that the permanent secretariat should in any event be established in the place chosen for CEPOL’s seat.
11. marts 2004 ENDELIG A5-0141/2004 *
11 March 2004 FINAL A5-0141/2004 *
om forslag til Rådets forordning om indførelse af en ordning for mindre grænsetrafik ved de midlertidige ydre landgrænser mellem medlemsstaterne
on the Commission proposal for adoption of a Council regulation on the establishment of a regime of local border traffic at the temporary external land borders between Member States
PR_CNS_title4am PE 339.603
PR_CNS_title4am PE 339.603
Med skrivelse af 18. september 2003 anmodede Rådet i overensstemmelse med EF-traktatens artikel 67 Parlamentet om en udtalelse om forslag til Rådets forordning om indførelse af en ordning for mindre grænsetrafik ved de midlertidige ydre landgrænser mellem medlemsstaterne ( KOM(2003) 502 – 2003/0194(CNS)).
By letter of 18 September 2003 the Council consulted Parliament, pursuant to Article 67 of the EC Treaty, on the Commission proposal for adoption of a Council regulation on the establishment of a regime of local border traffic at the temporary external land borders between Member States ( COM(2003) 502 – 2003/0194(CNS)).
På mødet den 22. september 2003 meddelte Parlamentets formand, at dette forslag var henvist til Udvalget om Borgernes Friheder og Rettigheder og Retlige og Indre Anliggender som korresponderende udvalg og til Udvalget om Udenrigsanliggender, Menneskerettigheder, Fælles Sikkerhed og Forsvarspolitik som rådgivende udvalg ( C5-0443/2003 ).
At the sitting of 22 September 2003 the President of Parliament announced that he had referred the proposal to the Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs as the committee responsible and the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy for its opinion ( C5-0443/2003 ).
På mødet den 30. september 2003 valgte Udvalget om Borgernes Friheder og Rettigheder og Retlige og Indre Anliggender The Earl of Stockton til ordfører.
The Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs appointed The Earl of Stockton rapporteur at its meeting of 30 September 2003.
På møder den 25. november 2003 og den 18. februar og 9. marts 2004 behandlede udvalget Kommissionens forslag og udkastet til betænkning.
The committee considered the Commission proposal and draft report at its meetings of 25 November 2003, 18 February and 9 March 2004.
Til stede under afstemningen var: Jorge Salvador Hernández Mollar (formand), Robert J.E. Evans (næstformand), Johanna L.A. Boogerd-Quaak (næstformand), Giacomo Santini (næstformand), The Earl of Stockton (ordfører), Alima Boumediene-Thiery, Marco Cappato (for Maurizio Turco), Massimo Carraro (for Ozan Ceyhun, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 153, stk. 2), Michael Cashman, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Carlos Coelho, Thierry Cornillet, Gérard M.J. Deprez, Giuseppe Di Lello Finuoli, Giovanni Claudio Fava (for Martin Schulzj, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 153, stk. 2), Timothy Kirkhope, Eva Klamt, Jean Lambert (for Heide Rühle), Kurt Lechner (for Hubert Pirker), Ana Miranda de Lage (for Carmen Cerdeira Morterero, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 153, stk. 2), Pasqualina Napoletano (for Walter Veltroni, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 153, stk. 2), Hartmut Nassauer, Bill Newton Dunn, Marcelino Oreja Arburúa, Elena Ornella Paciotti, Paolo Pastorelli (for Mary Elizabeth Banotti), Bernd Posselt, Martine Roure, Gerhard Schmid, Olle Schmidt (for Baroness Ludford), Ingo Schmitt (for Ian Twinn), Ole Sørensen (for Francesco Rutelli), Patsy Sörensen, Joke Swiebel, Anna Terrón i Cusí, Elena Valenciano Martínez-Orozco (for Adeline Hazan, jf. forretningsordenens artikel 153, stk. 2), Gianni Vattimo (for Sérgio Sousa Pinto) og Christian Ulrik von Boetticher.
The following were present for the vote: Jorge Salvador Hernández Mollar (chairman), Robert J.E. Evans (vice-chairman), Johanna L.A. Boogerd-Quaak (vice-chairwoman), Giacomo Santini (vice-chairman), The Earl of Stockton (rapporteur), Alima Boumediene-Thiery, Marco Cappato (for Maurizio Turco), Massimo Carraro (for Ozan Ceyhun pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Michael Cashman, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Carlos Coelho, Thierry Cornillet, Gérard M.J. Deprez, Giuseppe Di Lello Finuoli, Giovanni Claudio Fava (for Martin Schulz pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Timothy Kirkhope, Eva Klamt, Jean Lambert (for Heide Rühle), Kurt Lechner (for Hubert Pirker), Ana Miranda de Lage (for Carmen Cerdeira Morterero pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Pasqualina Napoletano (for Walter Veltroni pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Hartmut Nassauer, Bill Newton Dunn, Marcelino Oreja Arburúa, Elena Ornella Paciotti, Paolo Pastorelli (for Mary Elizabeth Banotti), Bernd Posselt, Martine Roure, Gerhard Schmid, Olle Schmidt (for Baroness Ludford), Ingo Schmitt (for Ian Twinn), Ole Sørensen (for Francesco Rutelli), Patsy Sörensen, Joke Swiebel, Anna Terrón i Cusí, Elena Valenciano Martínez-Orozco (for Adeline Hazan pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Gianni Vattimo (for Sérgio Sousa Pinto) and Christian Ulrik von Boetticher.
FORSLAG TIL EUROPA-PARLAMENTETS LOVGIVNINGSMÆSSIGE BESLUTNING om forslag til Rådets forordning om indførelse af en ordning for mindre grænsetrafik ved de midlertidige ydre landgrænser mellem medlemsstaterne ( KOM(2003) 502 – C5‑0443/2003 – 2003/0194(CNS))
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION on the Commission proposal for adoption of a Council regulation on the establishment of a regime of local border traffic at the temporary external land borders between Member States ( COM(2003) 502 – C5‑0443/2003 – 2003/0194(CNS))
- der henviser til Kommissionens forslag ( KOM(2003) 502 ) Endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT. ,
- having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2003) 502 ) Not yet published in OJ. ,
- der henviser til EF-traktatens artikel 62, stk. 2,
- having regard to Article 62(2) of the EC Treaty,
- der henviser til EF-traktatens artikel 67, der danner grundlag for Rådets høring af Parlamentet ( C5-0443/2003 ),
- having regard to Article 67 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C5-0443/2003 ),
- der henviser til betænkning fra Udvalget om Borgernes Friheder og Rettigheder og Retlige og Indre Anliggender ( A5-0141/2004 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs ( A5-0141/2004 ),
Kommissionens forslag Ændringsforslag Ændringsforslag 1 Artikel 5, stk. 2, indledning
Text proposed by the Commission Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Article 5, paragraph 2, introductory sentence
De aftaler, der er omhandlet i stk. 1, kan indeholde bestemmelser med henblik på at lette passagen af grænsen, som indebærer, at medlemsstaterne:
The agreements referred to in paragraph 1 may contain provisions for the facilitation of border crossing, whereby Member States:
De aftaler, der er omhandlet i stk. 1, indeholder bestemmelser med henblik på at lette passagen af grænsen, som indebærer, at medlemsstaterne:
The agreements referred to in paragraph 1 shall contain provisions for the facilitation of border crossing, whereby Member States:
Artikel 5, stk. 2, i forslaget til forordning skal sikre, og ikke blot foreslå, at bestemmelserne i litra a) og b) gennemføres.
Article 5 (2) of the draft regulation must ensure, rather than merely suggest that provisions provided for under (a) and (b) are implemented.
Ændringsforslag 2 Artikel 5, stk. 2, litra c
Amendment 2 Article 5, paragraph 2, letter c)
c) tillader indbyggerne i grænseområderne at passere deres grænse på andre steder end de godkendte grænseovergangssteder og uden for åbningstiden.
(c) authorise border residents to cross their border at places other than authorised border crossing points and outside the fixed hours.
Grænseområdernes indbyggere bør kun benytte godkendte grænseovergangssteder i åbningstiden.
Border residents should only use authorised crossing points during fixed hours.
I forbindelse med denne forordning kan visumfritagne indbyggere i grænseområderne opholde sig i grænseområdet i en nabomedlemsstat i op til syv dage i træk.
For the purposes of this Regulation, border residents not requiring a visa may stay in the border area of a neighbouring Member State for up to seven consecutive days.
Den samlede varighed af de enkelte ophold i den pågældende medlemsstat må ikke overstige tre måneder pr. halvår.
The total duration of their successive visits in that Member State shall not exceed three months within any half-year period.
I forbindelse med denne forordning kan visumfritagne indbyggere i grænseområderne opholde sig i grænseområdet i en nabomedlemsstat i op til 14 dage i træk.
For the purposes of this Regulation, border residents not requiring a visa may stay in the border area of a neighbouring Member State for up to fourteen consecutive days.
(Dette ændringsforslag stammer oprindelig fra den ungarske ELDR-observatør István Szent-Ivànyi)
(This amendment was initiated by Hungarian ELDR observer István Szent-Ivànyi.)
Kravet om at skulle vende tilbage i løbet af en uge er en for voldsom restriktion for indbyggerne.
The weekly demand of return would impose a disproportionate limitation on the beneficiary.
Ændringsforslag 4 Artikel 9, stk. 3
Amendment 4 Article 9, paragraph 3
Visummet giver indehaveren ret til flere passager af den udstedende medlemsstats ydre landgrænse og til at opholde sig i grænseområdet i den pågældende medlemsstat i op til syv dage i træk.
The visa shall entitle the holder to multiple crossings of the external land border of the issuing Member State and to stay within the border area of that Member State for up to seven consecutive days.
Den samlede varighed af de enkelte ophold i den pågældende medlemsstat må ikke overstige tre måneder pr. halvår.
The total duration of the successive visits in that Member state shall not exceed three month within any half-period.
Visummet giver indehaveren ret til flere passager af den udstedende medlemsstats ydre landgrænse og til at opholde sig i grænseområdet i den pågældende medlemsstat i op til 14 dage i træk.
The visa shall entitle the holder to multiple crossings of the external land border of the issuing Member State and to stay within the border area of that Member State for up to fourteen consecutive days.
The origins of the proposal
The origins of the proposal
Out of a concern to 'facilitat[e] the crossing of external borders for bona fide third-country nationals living in the border areas that have legitimate and valid grounds for regularly crossing the border and do not pose any security threat' , the Commission has drafted a proposal for a regulation on local border traffic at the external borders, so as to ensure that, after enlargement, the new external border does not impede trade, social and cultural exchange or regional cooperation.
Out of a concern to 'facilitat[e] the crossing of external borders for bona fide third-country nationals living in the border areas that have legitimate and valid grounds for regularly crossing the border and do not pose any security threat' Communication to the Council and the European Parliament, 'Wider Europe — Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours', COM(2003)) 104 final. , the Commission has drafted a proposal for a regulation on local border traffic at the external borders, so as to ensure that, after enlargement, the new external border does not impede trade, social and cultural exchange or regional cooperation.
However, being equally aware of the need to clarify the rules applicable to local border traffic within the enlarged Union itself, the Commission has also submitted a second proposal for a regulation applicable to the so-called 'temporary' external land borders, i.e. those between the new Member States and the present Schengen States, as well as the borders between the new Member States themselves.
However, being equally aware of the need to clarify the rules applicable to local border traffic within the enlarged Union itself, the Commission has also submitted a second proposal for a regulation applicable to the so-called 'temporary' external land borders, i.e. those between the new Member States and the present Schengen States, as well as the borders between the new Member States themselves.
The intention is that, even after enlargement, border controls should remain in place for a certain time until the new Member States are fully applying the Schengen acquis.
The intention is that, even after enlargement, border controls should remain in place for a certain time until the new Member States are fully applying the Schengen acquis.
Until the actual lifting of controls at the temporary external borders, the Commission therefore intends to apply to third-country nationals who are legally resident in border areas at the temporary external borders the same arrangements as apply to people living near the external borders.
Until the actual lifting of controls at the temporary external borders, the Commission therefore intends to apply to third-country nationals who are legally resident in border areas at the temporary external borders the same arrangements as apply to people living near the external borders.
Aims and content of the proposal
Aims and content of the proposal
At present the situation as regards local border traffic is characterised by the existence of numerous bilateral agreements between particular Member States and neighbouring third countries.
At present the situation as regards local border traffic is characterised by the existence of numerous bilateral agreements between particular Member States and neighbouring third countries.
The Commission therefore proposes harmonising to some extent the rules applied to local border traffic, the aim being essentially to ensure that the everyday life of people living in border areas who, whether for family, professional, social or cultural reasons, have occasion to cross the border frequently is not complicated excessively by the next enlargement.
The Commission therefore proposes harmonising to some extent the rules applied to local border traffic, the aim being essentially to ensure that the everyday life of people living in border areas who, whether for family, professional, social or cultural reasons, have occasion to cross the border frequently is not complicated excessively by the next enlargement.
This issue is of particular importance in the context of enlargement, as very large numbers of people will continue to cross borders, particularly between the accession states and between them and the old Member States.
This issue is of particular importance in the context of enlargement, as very large numbers of people will continue to cross borders, particularly between the accession states and between them and the old Member States.
The regulation proposed by the Commission for the temporary external borders, Article 1 of which lays down that the 'regime of local border traffic' which applies at the external borders should also apply at the temporary external borders to local border traffic, i.e. regular crossing of the external land border of a Member State by persons legally resident in the border area of a neighbouring country with the aim of remaining in the border area of the Member State (limited to 50 km) for a period limited by the regulation (a maximum of seven consecutive days and, at all events, not more than three months per half-year).
The regulation proposed by the Commission for the temporary external borders, Article 1 of which lays down that the 'regime of local border traffic' which applies at the external borders should also apply at the temporary external borders to local border traffic, i.e. regular crossing of the external land border of a Member State by persons legally resident in the border area of a neighbouring country with the aim of remaining in the border area of the Member State (limited to 50 km) for a period limited by the regulation (a maximum of seven consecutive days and, at all events, not more than three months per half-year).
The specific arrangements applicable to this local border traffic are as follows: for border residents not requiring a visa, it is intended that, as a rule, it should be possible to cross the borders without producing any travel document other than an identity card or a specific border crossing permit.
The specific arrangements applicable to this local border traffic are as follows: for border residents not requiring a visa , it is intended that, as a rule, it should be possible to cross the borders without producing any travel document other than an identity card or a specific border crossing permit.
As for border residents requiring a visa, they may obtain a specific visa intended for them, whose characteristics are as follows:
As for border residents requiring a visa , they may obtain a specific visa intended for them, whose characteristics are as follows:
- its territorial validity will be limited to the border area of the issuing Member State.
- its territorial validity will be limited to the border area of the issuing Member State.
It will entitle the holder to stay within that area for up to seven consecutive days; the total duration of the successive visits to the area must not exceed three months within any half- year period;
It will entitle the holder to stay within that area for up to seven consecutive days; the total duration of the successive visits to the area must not exceed three months within any half- year period;
- it will entitle the holder to multiple crossings of the border of the issuing Member State;
- it will entitle the holder to multiple crossings of the border of the issuing Member State;
- it will be valid for a minimum of one year and a maximum of up to five years;
- it will be valid for a minimum of one year and a maximum of up to five years;
- the same security precautions will apply to it as to a normal short-stay visa;
- the same security precautions will apply to it as to a normal short-stay visa;
- it will be possible for the visa fee to be reduced or waived.
- it will be possible for the visa fee to be reduced or waived.
An important point to be noted: these arrangements are applicable only to third-country nationals legally resident in the border area of a Member State.
An important point to be noted: these arrangements are applicable only to third-country nationals legally resident in the border area of a Member State.
Community law already gives citizens of the Union rights of free movement which go beyond the specific arrangements proposed for local border traffic.
Community law already gives citizens of the Union rights of free movement which go beyond the specific arrangements proposed for local border traffic.
These rights will be unaffected by the arrangements which the Commission proposes.
These rights will be unaffected by the arrangements which the Commission proposes.
It may also be noted that, in view of the local nature of the traffic to which the proposal relates, the practical application of the rules is delegated to the Member States, which, by means of bilateral agreements, may negotiate specific conditions applicable to local border traffic with the countries concerned, while complying with the general rules laid down at Community level.
It may also be noted that, in view of the local nature of the traffic to which the proposal relates, the practical application of the rules is delegated to the Member States, which, by means of bilateral agreements, may negotiate specific conditions applicable to local border traffic with the countries concerned, while complying with the general rules laid down at Community level.
The Commission has put forward two proposals laying down rules on criteria and conditions for establishing a regime of local border traffic (CNS030193), and introducing a specific (local) visa for that purpose.
The Commission has put forward two proposals laying down rules on criteria and conditions for establishing a regime of local border traffic (CNS030193), and introducing a specific (local) visa for that purpose.
The reasons for making two proposals are:
The reasons for making two proposals are:
- unlike the present situation, most of the third countries neighbouring the new EU Member States are countries whose nationals must be in possession of a visa when entering the EU;
- unlike the present situation, most of the third countries neighbouring the new EU Member States are countries whose nationals must be in possession of a visa when entering the EU;
- as a consequence of the two-step implementation procedure of the Schengen acquis, the new Member States will have to apply the full Schengen external border regime at all their borders upon accession.
- as a consequence of the two-step implementation procedure of the Schengen acquis, the new Member States will have to apply the full Schengen external border regime at all their borders upon accession.
This means that border controls will also remain in place, until the Council authorises the full application of the Schengen acquis, between the new Member States and present Schengen States, as well as between the new Member States themselves ('temporary external borders').
This means that border controls will also remain in place, until the Council authorises the full application of the Schengen acquis, between the new Member States and present Schengen States, as well as between the new Member States themselves ('temporary external borders').
This is the reason why the Commission considers it appropriate - until the full implementation of the Schengen acquis by the new Member States, when internal border controls will actually be lifted - to apply the facilitated border crossing regime envisaged for border residents also to such 'temporary external borders'.
This is the reason why the Commission considers it appropriate - until the full implementation of the Schengen acquis by the new Member States, when internal border controls will actually be lifted - to apply the facilitated border crossing regime envisaged for border residents also to such 'temporary external borders'.
Consequently, two instruments are proposed:
Consequently, two instruments are proposed:
- a Regulation laying down general rules on the criteria and conditions applicable for establishing a regime of local border traffic at the external land borders of the Member States, and introducing a specific visa for that purpose (see CNS030193);
- a Regulation laying down general rules on the criteria and conditions applicable for establishing a regime of local border traffic at the external land borders of the Member States, and introducing a specific visa for that purpose (see CNS030193);
- a second Regulation applying the rules laid down in the above instrument to the 'temporary external borders' between Member States.
- a second Regulation applying the rules laid down in the above instrument to the 'temporary external borders' between Member States.