natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hvis et badevand er fjernet fra listen, er det vigtigt, at de badende er underrettet herom.
If a bathing water has been removed from the list it is important that the bather is informed about it.
Ændringsforslag 24 Artikel 16, stk. 1, litra c a (nyt)
Amendment 24 Article 16, paragraph 1, point (c) a (new)
ca) i nødsituationer skal de offentlige myndigheder i samarbejde med alle berørte parter sikre, at publikum på klar og sammenhængende vis informeres om enhver potentiel risiko via midlertidig skiltning på badestedet.
(ca) In the event of an emergency, public authorities must work together with all interested parties to ensure that the public are informed of any potential hazards clearly and coherently via temporary signage on location at the bathing site.
Information til offentligheden er vigtig.
Information to the public is important.
Myndighederne kan udnytte de berørte parters sagkundskab.
The authorities can use the expertise of interested parties.
Ændringsforslag 25 Artikel 16, stk. 2
Amendment 25 Article 16, paragraph 2
Medlemsstaterne anvender passende medier og teknologi, såsom Internettet , for omgående og aktivt at videreformidle de i stk. 1 omhandlede oplysninger om badevandet samt desuden følgende oplysninger:
Member States shall use appropriate media and technologies, such as the Internet, to actively and promptly disseminate the information concerning bathing water referred to in paragraph 1 and also the following information:
Medlemsstaterne anvender passende medier og teknologi, herunder Internettet , for omgående og aktivt at videreformidle de i stk. 1 omhandlede oplysninger om badevandet , herunder mindst den engelske og franske oversættelse heraf, samt desuden følgende oplysninger:
Member States shall use appropriate media and technologies, including the Internet, to actively and promptly disseminate the information , including at least English and French translation thereof, concerning bathing water referred to in paragraph 1 and also the following information:
Standardiserede advarselssymboler og oplysninger på flere sprog gør forslaget mere anvendeligt i praksis og mere nyttigt for alle badende.
Standardised warning symbols and information in several languages make the proposal more practicable and useful for all bathers.
Ændringsforslag 26 Artikel 16, stk. 2, litra a
Amendment 26 Article 16, paragraph 2, point (a)
a) badevandsprofilen og badevandsklassifikationen, herunder oplysninger i relation til andre fritidsaktiviteter
(a) the bathing water’s profile and the bathing water’s classification, including information in relation to other recreational activities,
De i stk. 1 og 2 omhandlede oplysninger gøres tilgængelige for første gang tre år efter datoen i artikel 22, stk. 1.
Information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be made available for the first time three years following the date laid down in Article 22 (1).
Kommissionen udvikler efter høring af medlemsstaterne, relevante turist- og forbrugerorganisationer og andre berørte parter inden for en frist på to år et simpelt standardiseret system af symboler - f.eks. smileys - der af medlemsstaterne, amter, kommuner, turistvirksomheder osv. som ét blandt andre informationsværktøjer kan benyttes til at informere offentligheden.
The Commission shall after hearing the Member States, relevant tourist and consumer organisations and other interested parties, within two years develop a simple standardised system of symbols - e.g. smiling faces - which can be used in different matters by Member States, Counties, Municipalities, Tourist Industries etc. as one among other information tools in order to provide information to the public.
Systemet skal være tilgængeligt på en EU-website.
The system must be available on an EU website.
Ændringsforslag 28 Artikel 18 a (ny)
Amendment 28 Article 18 a (new)
Artikel 18a
Article 18a (new)
Kommissionen reviderer dette direktiv senest 15 år efter dets ikrafttræden, navnlig for så vidt angår parametrene for badevandskvalitet, og forelægger i overensstemmelse med traktatens artikel 251 de nødvendige lovgivningsmæssige forslag med henblik på denne revision.
The Commission shall review this Directive at the latest 15 years after its entry into force, with particular regard to the parameters for bathing water quality, and shall present appropriate legislative proposals in accordance with Article 251 of Treaty for the review of this Directive.
I betragtning af direktivets samvirke med andre direktiver såsom vandrammedirektivet, byspildevandsdirektivet og nitratdirektivet bør der foretages en revision af det efter 15 år.
Given the synergy of this directive with other directives such as the water framework directive, the urban waste water directive or the nitrates directive, a revision after 15 years is appropriate.
Analysemetoderne for parametrene i bilag I kan tilpasses til den videnskabelige og tekniske udvikling efter proceduren i artikel 20, stk. 2.
The methods of analysis for the parameters set out in Annex I may be adapted to scientific and technical progress in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 20(2).
Da testene i forbindelse med de virologiske analyser er nået langt, kan der med det samme ske tilpasning af den tekniske del.
Since virological-analysis tests have now reached a satisfactory stage of development, the technical aspect of the directive may be updated immediately.
Tilstedeværelsen af virusser i badevand repræsenterer en betydelig risiko.
The presence of viruses in bathing water represents a significant risk.
Det bør være obligatorisk og ikke valgfrit at lade virusdetektion omfatte af dette direktiv.
It should be mandatory and not optional to include the detection of viruses in this Directive.
Ændringsforslag 31 Bilag I, række 3
Amendment 31 ANNEX I, Parameters for Bathing Water Quality, row 3
Fytoplanktonopblomstringer eller makroalgevækst
Phytoplankton blooms or macro-algae proliferation
Udmærket kvalitet
Excellent Quality
Simpel rettelse af en udeladelse i Kommissionens tekst.
Simple correction of an omission in the Commission's proposal.
Ændringsforslag 32 Bilag III, litra a a (nyt)
Amendment 32 ANNEX III, The Bathing Water Profile (a) a (new)
aa) en beskrivelse af badevandets fysiske, geografiske og hydrologiske egenskaber set i forhold til vandrammedirektivet (direktiv 2000/60/EF)
aa) a description of the physical, geographical and hydrological characteristics of the bathing water in relation to the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC;
Ændringsforslag 33 Bilag III, litra c
Amendment 33 ANNEX III, The Bathing Water Profile (c)
c) en vurdering af risikoen for, at disse kilder forurener badevandet og dermed skader de badendes helbred.
c) an assessment of their potential to pollute bathing water, thus impairing the health of bathers.
I vurderingen tages der hensyn til tidsaspektet - risiko forårsaget af særlige omstændigheder eller kronisk risiko - og til arten og omfanget af alle forurenende og potentielt forurenende udledninger og virkningerne heraf, idet der tages højde for afstanden til badevandet.
This assessment should be made, in terms of time - accidental or chronic risk potential - and in terms of the nature and volume of all polluting and potentially polluting discharges and their effects assessed in terms of distance from the bathing water.
c) en vurdering af risikoen for, at disse kilder forurener badevandet og dermed skader de badendes helbred , og en vurdering af badevandets miljøkvalitet i henhold til vandrammedirektivet .
c) an assessment of their potential to pollute bathing water, thus impairing the health of bathers , as well as an assessment of the environmental quality of the bathing water according to the Water Framework Directive .
Ændringsforslag 34 Bilag III, litra c, afsnit 2
Amendment 34 ANNEX III, The Bathing Water Profile (c), 2nd paragraph
Oplysningerne under a) og b) bør også anføres på et detaljeret kort.
Elements a) and b) should also be provided on a detailed map.
Oplysningerne under a) , aa) og b) bør også anføres på et detaljeret kort.
Elements a) aa) and b) should also be provided on a detailed map.
Der kan tilføjes andre relevante oplysninger, dersom det skønnes rimeligt.
Other relevant information may be attached or included as deemed appropriate.
De ressourcer, der skal investeres, bør være afstemt efter forholdene, først og fremmest i medlemsstater med et stort antal badevande.
The effort involved should be proportionate, particularly for Member States with a large number of bathing waters.
Kravene formuleres, så de er mere forståelige.
Requirements should be worded more clearly.
Ændringsforslag 35 Bilag V, punkt 4, rubrik 2
Amendment 35 ANNEX V, Standards for Handling of Samples, 4, row 2
Prøven opbevares ved en temperatur på ca. 4°C, i køleboks eller køleskab (hvis muligt) indtil ankomst til laboratoriet.
The sample should be conserved at a temperature of around 4°C, in a cool box or refrigerator (if possible) until arrival at the laboratory.
Kan transporten til laboratoriet ventes at tage mere end 4 timer, anbefales transport i køleskab.
If the transport to the laboratory is likely to take more than 4 hours, then transport in a refrigerator is highly recommended .
Prøven opbevares ved en temperatur på ca. 4°C, i køleboks eller køleskab indtil ankomst til laboratoriet.
The sample should be conserved at a temperature of around 4°C, in a cool box or refrigerator until arrival at the laboratory.
Kan transporten til laboratoriet ventes at tage mere end 4 timer, kræves transport i køleskab.
If the transport to the laboratory is likely to take more than 4 hours, then transport in a refrigerator is required .
På grund af den hurtige nedbrydning af bakterier bør opbevaring og transport af prøver standardiseres mest muligt for at sikre korrekte målinger.
Due to the rapid decay of bacteria, storage and transport of samples should be standardised as much as possible so as to ensure correct measurements.
Temperaturen må til enhver tid holdes på 4°, idet de konstaterede koncentrationer ellers kunne tænkes at være lavere end de koncentrationer, der faktisk er tale om i det pågældende badevand.
Temperature needs to be kept at 4°C at all times, otherwise concentrations found may be lower than those actually present in the water
Ændringsforslag 36 Bilag V, punkt 4, rubrik 3
Amendment 36 ANNEX V, Standards for Handling of Samples, 4, row 3
Tidsrummet mellem prøvetagning og analyse bør være så kort som muligt.
The time between the sampling and the analysis should be kept as short as possible.
Det anbefales, at prøverne analyseres samme dag som prøvetagningen.
It is recommended to analyse the samples on the same working day.
Er dette umuligt af praktiske grunde, kan prøverne analyseres inden højst 24 timer, forudsat at de opbevares i mørke og tættest muligt ved 4°C.
If this is not possible for practical reasons, then the samples must be processed within maximum 24 hours, provided that the samples are stored in the dark and as close to 4°C as possible .
Er dette umuligt af praktiske grunde, kan prøverne analyseres inden højst 24 timer, forudsat at de opbevares i mørke og ved 4°C.
If this is not possible for practical reasons, then the samples must be processed within maximum 24 hours, provided that the samples are stored in the dark and at 4°C
Temperaturen må til enhver tid holdes på 4°, idet de konstaterede koncentrationer ellers kunne tænkes at være lavere end de koncentrationer, der faktisk er tale om i det pågældende badevand.
Temperature needs to be kept at 4°C at all times, otherwise concentrations found may be lower than those actually present in the water.
Ordføreren, Jules Maaten, vil gerne takke Kommissionen for det nye badevandsdirektiv.
Your rapporteur is grateful to the Commission for the new bathing water directive.
Det oprindelige direktiv fra 1976 trængte faktisk til en fornyelse.
The original 1976 directive was indeed in need of updating.
Den kritik af Kommissionens undersøgelse, der kom til udtryk under den første drøftelse, har foranlediget ordføreren til selv at iværksætte en undersøgelse af de eventuelle problemer ved det nye badevandsdirektiv.
The rapporteur has taken up the criticism of the Commission's research, voiced during the initial exchange of views, in order to conduct his own inquiries into the possible problems surrounding the new bathing water directive.
Der er ikke alene hørt mange interessegrupper, men der er også sendt et spørgeskema til de ansvarlige myndigheder i medlemsstaterne.
Not only has there been consultation of a host of interest groups; rather, a questionnaire has also been sent to the competent Member State authorities.
Der er indløbet mere end halvtreds reaktioner, der skaber et godt billede af de praktiske problemer ved det eksisterende direktiv og mulige problemer med Kommissionens forslag.
More than 50 replies have been received, providing a good insight into the practical problems surrounding the present directive and the potential problems surrounding the Commission's proposal.
Desuden har Regionsudvalget og Det Europæiske Økonomiske og Sociale Udvalg ydet fremragende arbejde.
The Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee have also carried out excellent work.
Mine konklusioner er, at et nyt badevandsdirektivet med en proaktiv vandpolitik har en positiv effekt på kvaliteten af badevand i Europa og på de ferierendes velbefindende.
The rapporteur has come to the conclusion that a new bathing water directive involving a proactive water policy will have a positive impact on bathing water quality in Europe and on recreational water users' well-being.
Det er meget vigtigt, eftersom de europæiske borgere har angivet, at de finder rent badevand vigtigt.
That is of major significance: Europe's citizens have made it clear that they regard clean bathing water as important.
Vi må da også sørge for, at vi ikke svigter forbrugerens tillid på dette felt.
We must therefore ensure that consumer confidence is not disappointed.
Men direktivet må være gennemførligt og realisabelt.
However, the directive must be workable and enforceable.
Jeg vil gerne endnu en gang henvise til, at direktivet skaber forvirring.
Your rapporteur would again point out that the draft is confusing.
Således er det uforståeligt for mange borgere, at et direktiv, der med al tydelighed er udarbejdet for at fremme folkesundheden, baseres på artikel 175 (miljø) som retsgrundlag.
Many citizens will find it unfathomable, for instance, why a directive which has been patently obviously drawn up with a view to promoting public health should take Article 175 (environment) as its legal basis.
Det bør ikke være sådan, at det som følge af det nye direktiv straks meddeles en lang række eksisterende og officielt udpegede badesteder, som offentligheden siden år og dag har benyttet, at vandet er af ringe kvalitet, og at stedet må udgå af badevandslisten.
It would be unacceptable if as a result of the new directive, at many officially designated bathing sites in public use for many years, there had to be immediate notification that water quality was inadequate and that sites had to be removed from the list of bathing waters.
Vi må undgå en situation, hvor vi laver lovgivning, der ikke kan gennemføres i praksis.
We must prevent unworkable legislation from being adopted.
Der er allerede iværksat utallige overtrædelsesprocedurer mod medlemsstaterne.
A host of infringement proceedings are already under way against Member States.
Det er bedre at udvikle et system, hvor vandmyndighederne stimuleres til at opretholde den bedst mulige kvalitet.
A system should preferably be developed which incentivises water management bodies to maintain a maximised quality level.
Mange lande har i de forløbne år ikke kunnet opfylde kravene og har derfor investeret meget i at opfylde kravene.
In the past, many countries were unable to comply with requirements and therefore invested a great deal in order to be able to do so.
- 1995: 3000 europæiske strande opfylder ikke normerne.
- 1995: 3000 European beaches were non-compliant.
30 % af de 1700 badevandsoverflader opfylder ikke minimumskravene.
30% of the 1700 bathing water areas did not comply with minimum requirements.
Ti år efter fristen opfylder ikke en eneste medlemsstat betingelserne.
Ten years after the time limit, not one Member State met requirements.
- 1996: 90 % af kyststrandene opfylder minimumsstandarderne, en af tre strande ved floder og søer opfylder dem.
- 1996: 90% of coastal beaches met minimum standards; one in three beaches at rivers or lakes was compliant.
- 1997: Tyskland indbringes for Domstolen.
- 1997: Germany was prosecuted before the European Court of Justice.
- 1997: 90 % af kyststrandene, 80 % af de indre badevandsområder.
- 1997: 90% of coastal beaches and 80% of inland beaches were compliant.
- 1998: Næsten 95 % af kyststrandene opfylder minimumskravene, 80 % af de indre badevandsområder.
- 1998: Close to 95% of coastal beaches and 80% of inland beaches met minimum requirements.
- 1998: Spanien indbringes for Domstolen.
- 1998: Spain was prosecuted before the European Court of Justice.
- 1999: Portugal og Finland indbringes for Domstolen.
- 1999: Portugal and Finland were prosecuted before the European Court of Justice.
- 1999: Frankrig, Finland, Sverige, Danmark og Italien opfylder ikke forpligtelserne.
- 1999: France, Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Italy were not compliant with requirements.
- 2000: Frankrig, Italien, Sverige, Det Forenede Kongerige, Finland og Danmark opfylder ikke forpligtelserne.
- 2000: France, Italy, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Finland and Denmark were not compliant with requirements.
- 2000: 97 % af kystvandene og 94 % af de indre badevandsområder opfylder forpligtelserne.
- 2000: 97% of coastal waters and 94% of inland beaches met requirements.
- 2001: Danmark, Belgien, Frankrig, Spanien og Det Forenede Kongerige opfylder ikke forpligtelserne.
- 2001: Denmark, Belgium, France, Spain and the United Kingdom were not compliant with requirements.
EU's kystvande
EU coastal waters
EU's ferskvandsområder
EU inland waters
* "Overensstemmelse": overholder de obligatoriske standarder i direktiv 76/160/EG.
* With the mandatory standards under Directive 76/160/EG
° "Andet": badevand, der ikke overholder standarderne, der ikke er tilstrækkeligt undersøgt, og hvor badning er forbudt.
° 'Other' encompasses bathing waters not compliant with standards or insufficiently tested or with a ban on bathing.
Kilde: European report, courtesy of EIS
Source: European report (courtesy of EIS)
Oversigten viser, at det har været meget svært for mange lande at opfylde normerne.
The overview shows that many countries found it very difficult to comply with standards.
Heldigvis er kvaliteten af badevandet forbedret betydeligt i de forløbne år som følge af medlemsstaternes investeringer.
Fortunately, there has been a considerable improvement in bathing water quality as a result of Member States' investment over the last few years.
Kommissionen ønsker nu at øge normerne yderligere.
The Commission now seeks to raise standards even higher.
Det betyder for et land som Nederlandene, at 30 % af badevandet ikke længere kan bedømmes som "godt".
Accordingly, for a country such as the Netherlands, 30% of bathing waters can no longer be rated 'good'.
Ved at øge normerne yderligere ønsker Kommissionen tilsyneladende at straffe medlemsstaterne for deres gode indsats.
By raising standards, the Commission seemingly wants to punish Member States for having performed well.
Jeg forudser en lang række overtrædelsesprocedurer i de kommende år, hvis de foreslåede nye normer vedtages.
Your rapporteur foresees a host of infringement proceedings over the next few years if the proposed new standards are adopted.
På den anden side må vi tage udfordringen op og forbedre badevandskvaliteten yderligere.
On the other hand, the challenge of improving bathing water quality even further must be taken up.
Da der er en meget stor risiko for, at mange badeområder vil forsvinde med de nye parametre, bør de nuværende værdier for de to parametre opretholdes.
Since many bathing areas are very likely to be taken out of use as a result of the new parameters, the present values for the two parameters concerned must be maintained.
Hermed undgår man ikke blot mange overtrædelsesprocedurer, men det er også svært at få offentligheden til at forstå, at badevand, der først blev kvalificeret som "godt", nu pludselig ikke længere opfylder normerne.
Not only would that head off a large number of infringement proceedings; in addition, it would be hard to persuade the public to accept that bathing waters which used to be rated 'good' now were no longer compliant.
Det vil føre til forvirring og mistillid hos de badende.
That would confuse the bathing public and raise suspicions.
Der findes intet videnskabeligt bevis for ikke at opretholde de nuværende normer.
No scientific proof has been furnished that the present standards are inadequate.
Men naturligvis er højere normer som angivet af WHO og Den Videnskabelige Komité for Toksicitet, Økotoksicitet og Miljø (SCTEE) værd at stræbe efter.
It goes without saying that, as has been indicated by the WHO and the Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment (SCTEE), higher standards should be pursued.
Min undersøgelse har vist, at landene gerne vil opfylde normerne, men at det simpelt hen er umuligt for visse vandoverflader.
Your rapporteur's inquiries show that countries are entirely willing to comply with standards, but that that is simply not possible in the case of some surface waters.
Da medlemsstaterne har et bedre overblik over situationen end Kommissionen, bør medlemsstaterne selv udpege badevandsområderne og angive, hvilke badevandsområder der opfylder normen "udmærket", og hvilke områder der opfylder normen "god".
As the Member States have a better overall view of the situation than the Commission, they themselves should identify bathing waters, specifying those which meet the 'excellent' and 'good' standards.
På denne måde skal badevandskvaliteten forbedres yderligere og en række overtrædelsesprocedurer undgås.
That would further increase bathing water quality and prevent a large number of infringement proceedings.
Naturligvis skal medlemsstaterne motiveres til at tilstræbe bedre værdier.
Naturally, Member States must be motivated into seeking improved values.
Bedre informationsformidling til offentligheden kan være en løsning her.
Better provision of information for the public can provide an answer to this.
Hvis det præciseres over for offentligheden, at en strand er renere end påkrævet, nemlig af "udmærket kvalitet", vil der komme flere turister.
If it can be demonstrated to the public that a particular beach is cleaner than is strictly speaking necessary, i.e. that its quality rating is 'excellent', more holidaymakers will use it.
God informationsformidling er derfor meget vigtig.
Proper provision of information is therefore highly important.
Kommissionen gør ret i at fastslå, at det derfor er vigtigt at offentliggøre information om badevand på internettet.
The Commission correctly concludes that it is important to publish information on bathing water on the Internet.
For øjeblikket sker dette i helt utilstrækkeligt omfang.
Action at present is highly inadequate.
Ved min undersøgelse viste det sig vanskeligt at undersøge inden for ti minutter, hvad kvaliteten af badevandet i Europa er.
Your rapporteur found it difficult, during his inquiries, to find out in less than 10 minutes how good or bad bathing water in Europe is.
Desuden var grafik og forklaringer ikke tydelige, idet der hele tiden henvistes til, at oplysningerne ikke var fuldstændige, da visse medlemsstater ikke havde tilsendt Kommissionen de nødvendige oplysninger.
Graphics and commentaries were extremely unclear, though it should be pointed out that the information is not complete because a number of Member States have not forwarded the necessary details to the Commission.
Dette viser endnu en gang, at det ikke tjener noget formål at lave lovgivning, som medlemsstaterne i praksis ikke kan overholde!
That again makes it clear that it is pointless to adopt legislation which, in practise, cannot be complied with by Member States.