natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Medmindre den berørte medlemsstat har modsat sig det, kan Kommissionen, når den finder, at der findes et sådant særskilt marked, og at dette vil blive berørt af fusionen, beslutte at henvise hele sagen eller en del af den til de kompetente myndigheder i den berørte medlemsstat med henblik på anvendelse af denne stats nationale konkurrencelovgivning.
Unless the Member State concerned disagrees, the Commission, where it considers that such a distinct market exists, and will be affected by the concentration, may decide to refer the whole or part of the case to the competent authorities of that Member State with a view to the application of that State's national legislation on competition.
Medmindre den berørte medlemsstat har modsat sig det, kan Kommissionen, når den finder, at der findes et sådant særskilt marked, og at konkurrencen på dette i væsentlig grad vil blive berørt af fusionen, beslutte at henvise sagen til de kompetente myndigheder i den berørte medlemsstat med henblik på anvendelse af denne stats nationale konkurrencelovgivning.
Unless the Member State concerned disagrees, the Commission, where it considers that such a distinct market exists, and that the concentration will have significant effects on competition in that distinct market , may decide to refer the case to the competent authorities of that Member State with a view to the application of that State's national legislation on competition.
Beslutningen om at henvise eller ikke henvise sagen træffes inden for en frist på 20 arbejdsdage regnet fra datoen for Kommissionens modtagelse af den begrundede erklæring.
The decision whether or not to refer the case shall be taken within 20 working days starting from the receipt of the reasoned submission by the Commission.
Kommissionen underretter de andre medlemsstater og de deltagende virksomheder om sin beslutning.
The Commission shall inform the other Member States and the undertakings concerned of its decision.
Har Kommissionen ikke truffet beslutning inden for fristen, anses den for at have vedtaget en beslutning om sagens henvisning i overensstemmelse med erklæringen fra de deltagende personer eller virksomheder.
If the Commission does not take a decision within this period, it shall be deemed to have adopted a decision to refer the case in accordance with the submission made by the persons or undertakings concerned.
Beslutter Kommissionen at henvise hele sagen eller en del af den til de kompetente myndigheder i den berørte medlemsstat, skal der ikke indgives nogen anmeldelse i efter stk. 1.
If the Commission decides to refer the whole of the case to the competent authorities of the Member State concerned, no notification shall be made pursuant to paragraph 1.
Beslutter Kommissionen at henvise sagen til de kompetente myndigheder i den berørte medlemsstat, skal der ikke indgives nogen anmeldelse i efter stk. 1.
If the Commission decides to refer the case to the competent authorities of the Member State concerned, no notification shall be made pursuant to paragraph 1.
Artikel 9, stk. 6 til 10 , finder tilsvarende anvendelse.
Article 9(6) to (10) shall apply mutatis mutandis .
Artikel 9, stk. 6 til 9a , finder tilsvarende anvendelse.
Article 9(6) to (9a) shall apply mutatis mutandis .
Det er vigtigt, at de berørte virksomheder kan ansøge om henvisning forud for anmeldelsen, når fusionen har væsentlige virkninger for konkurrencen og ikke blot, når konkurrencen påvirkes negativt.
It is important that the undertakings concerned can also make a request for a pre-notification referral when the concentration has significant effects on competition and not only when competition is negatively affected.
Væsentlige virkninger kan også være positive eller neutrale ( i forhold til aktiver, omsætning, personale osv.).
Significant effects can also be positive or neutral (related to assets, turnover or personnel, etc.).
For at undgå forsinkelser og øge sikkerheden bør medlemsstaternes frist for at reagere være fem arbejdsdage.
To avoid delays and increase certainty, the time period for the Member State to react should be five working days.
Henvisning af en del af en sag har i praksis givet anledning til en række problemer vedrørende usikkerhed, der skyldes spredning af en sag blandt flere forskellige nationale jurisdiktioner.
In practice partial referrals have caused a series of problems, because of the uncertainty arising from the fragmentation of a case being dealt with by several national jurisdictions.
Dette medfører en alvorlig afvigelse fra princippet om ”one stop shop”.
This is a serious departure from the principle of the 'one-stop shop'.
Også i forbindelse med fusioner, der er henvist før anmeldelsen, bør den nationale lovgivning anvendes i overensstemmelse med forordningen.
In cases of pre-notification referrals too, national laws should be applied without contradicting the Community regulation.
Ændringsforslag 10 Artikel 4, stk. 5, afsnit 1, 2 og 3
Amendment 10 Article 4, paragraph 5
Hvad angår fusioner, der ikke vil have fællesskabsdimension som defineret i artikel 1, kan de deltagende personer eller virksomheder før anmeldelsen til de kompetente myndigheder i en eller flere medlemsstater ved en begrundet erklæring meddele Kommissionen, at fusionen har betydelige grænseoverskridende virkninger og derfor bør behandles af Kommissionen.
With regard to a concentration which would not have a Community dimension within the meaning of Article 1, the persons or undertakings concerned may, prior to its notification to the competent authorities of one or more Member States, inform the Commission by means of a reasoned submission that the concentration has significant cross-border effects and should therefore be examined by the Commission.
Hvad angår fusioner, der ikke vil have fællesskabsdimension som defineret i artikel 1, kan de deltagende personer eller virksomheder før anmeldelsen til de kompetente myndigheder i en eller flere medlemsstater ved en begrundet erklæring meddele Kommissionen, at alle de deltagende virksomheders samlede omsætning i mindst tre medlemsstater ligger over 10% af alle de deltagende virksomheders samlede omsætning i hele Fællesskabet, eller at fusionen er omfattet af nationale fusionsbestemmelser i flere medlemsstater, eller at fusionen af andre årsager har betydelige grænseoverskridende virkninger og derfor bør behandles af Kommissionen.
With regard to a concentration which would not have a Community dimension within the meaning of Article 1, the persons or undertakings concerned may, prior to its notification to the competent authorities of one or more Member States, inform the Commission by means of a reasoned submission that in at least three Member States the combined aggregate turnover of all undertakings concerned is more than 10% of the combined aggregate Community-wide turnover of all undertakings concerned, or that the concentration is subject to national merger control rules of several Member States, or that the concentration for other reasons has significant cross-border effects and should therefore be examined by the Commission.
Den eller de berørte medlemsstater træffer inden for en frist på 10 arbejdsdage efter modtagelsen af erklæring afgørelse om, hvorvidt Kommissionen skal anmodes om at behandle fusionen.
The Member State or States concerned shall decide, within 10 working days of receiving the submission, whether or not to request the Commission to examine the concentration.
Har en medlemsstat ikke truffet nogen afgørelse inden for fristen på 10 arbejdsdage, anses den for at have truffet afgørelse om at fremsætte en sådan anmodning.
Where a Member State takes no such decision within the aforementioned period of 10 working days, it shall be deemed to have adopted a decision to make such a request to the Commission.
Der skal ikke indgives anmeldelse til den eller de berørte medlemsstater, før der er truffet afgørelse om, hvorvidt der skal fremsættes anmodning.
No notification of the concentration shall be submitted to the Member State or States concerned before the decision whether or not to request has been adopted.
Den eller de berørte medlemsstater træffer inden for en frist på 5 arbejdsdage efter modtagelsen af erklæring afgørelse om, hvorvidt Kommissionen skal anmodes om at behandle fusionen.
The Member State or States concerned shall decide, within 5 working days of receiving the submission, whether or not to request the Commission to examine the concentration.
Har en medlemsstat ikke truffet nogen afgørelse inden for fristen på 5 arbejdsdage, anses den for at have truffet afgørelse om at fremsætte en sådan anmodning.
Where a Member State takes no such decision within the aforementioned period of 5 working days, it shall be deemed to have adopted a decision to make such a request to the Commission.
Det burde fortrinsvis på grundlag af disponibel objektiv information være let at konstatere, at en fusion har væsentlige grænseoverskridende virkninger.
It should be easy to establish, preferably on the basis of available objective information, that a concentration has significant cross-border effects.
Dette må f.eks. være tilfældet, hvis alle de deltagende virksomheders samlede omsætning i mindst tre medlemsstater ligger over 10% af alle de deltagende virksomheders samlede omsætning i hele Fællesskabet, men der er også andre muligheder.
This should e.g. be the case when in at least three Member States the combined aggregate turnover of all undertakings concerned is more than 10% of the combined aggregate Community-wide turnover of all undertakings concerned, without excluding other possible reasons.
Også en undersøgelse, der baseres på de fusionerede virksomheders omsætning i de pågældende lande, vil muliggøre let identifikation af de medlemsstater, der omfattes af dette stykke.
A test that is based on the turnover of the concentrated enterprises in the countries concerned would also allow easy and objective identification of the Member States involved in the application of this paragraph.
Ændringsforslag 11 Artikel 4, stk. 5 a (nyt)
Amendment 11 Article 4, paragraph 5 a (new)
Artikel 9, stk. 1, og artikel 22, stk. 1, omfatter ikke fusioner, når de deltagende virksomheder har anmodet om henvisning af sagen forud for anmeldelsen, jf. denne artikel.
Articles 9 (1) and 22 (1) will not apply to concentrations when the undertakings concerned have made a request for a pre-notification referral pursuant to this Article.
Det er vigtigt, at fusioner ikke på ny henvises til medlemsstaterne eller til Kommissionen, efter at de deltagende virksomheder har gjort brug af deres initiativret forud for anmeldelsen, og det er aftalt, at Kommissionen eller en medlemsstat behandler sagen på ny.
It is important that concentrations will not be referred again to the Member States or the Commission after the undertakings concerned have used their right of initiative at the pre-notifications stage and it was agreed that the Commission or a Member State would review the case.
Ændringsforslag 12 Artikel 6, stk. 1, litra b, sidste punktum
Amendment 12 Article 6, paragraph 1, point (b)
En beslutning, hvorved en fusion erklæres forenelig med fællesmarkedet, anses at omfatte konkurrencebegrænsninger, der er direkte knyttet til og nødvendige for fusionens gennemførelse.
The decision declaring the concentration compatible shall be deemed to cover restrictions directly related and necessary to the implementation of the concentration.
En beslutning, hvorved en fusion erklæres forenelig med fællesmarkedet, skal også omhandle konkurrencebegrænsninger, der er direkte knyttet til og nødvendige for fusionens gennemførelse.
The decision declaring the concentration compatible shall also cover restrictions directly related and necessary to the implementation of the concentration.
Det foreslås at bevare den nuværende formulering, eftersom Retten i Første Instans i sin dom af 20. november 2002 (Sag LAGARDERE) har gjort det klart, at de overvejelser, som Kommissionen fremsætter i begrundelsen til dens godkendelsesbeslutning med hensyn til disse begrænsninger, har karakter af en afgørelse på lige fod med selve godkendelsen af fusionen og ikke er af rent konstaterende karakter.
The current wording ought to be retained, given that in its ruling of 20 November 2002 (LAGARDERE case) the Court of First Instance stated that the Commission’s reasoning in the grounds of the decision of approval with regard to such restrictions are in the nature of a decision in the same way as the approval of the concentration, and are not merely of a declaratory nature.
Ændringsforslag 13 Artikel 7, stk. 4
Amendment 13 Article 7, paragraph 4
Kommissionen kan ved forordning definere kategorier af fusioner, for hvilke der anses at være meddelt dispensation efter stk. 3 fra de i stk. 1 og 2 fastsatte betingelser, forudsat at fusionen anmeldes og opfylder ethvert andet krav fastsat i en sådan forordning.
The Commission may, by regulation, define categories of concentrations for which a derogation within the meaning of paragraph 3 from the obligations imposed in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be deemed to have been granted subject to the concentration being notified and to any other requirements defined in such a regulation.
Disse kategorier må kun omfatte fusioner, der normalt ikke fører til en sammenlægning af markedsandele, der kan give anledning til konkurrenceproblemer.
Such categories may only cover concentrations which, in general, do not lead to a combination of market positions giving rise to competition concerns.
Dette er ikke nødvendigt, fordi der i henhold til artikel 7, stk. 3 er mulighed for at yde dispensation - også før anmeldelsen , og dette fungerer problemfrit.
There is no need for this as individual derogations may be granted pursuant to Article 7, paragraph 3 of the Regulation - even before notification - and this system works perfectly well.
Faren for misbrug og definitionsproblemer er betydeligt større end den formentlige nytte.
The risk of abuse and difficulties of distinguishing between categories is clearly greater than the supposed benefit.
Kommissionen kan påbyde enhver hensigtsmæssig foranstaltning for at sikre, at de deltagende virksomheder opløser fusionen eller iværksætter andre genoprettelsesforanstaltninger som krævet i dens beslutning , for så vidt som foranstaltningen står i et rimeligt forhold til fusionens konkurrencehæmmende virkning.
The Commission may order any appropriate measure to ensure that the undertakings concerned dissolve the concentration or take other restorative measures as required in its decision provided that this is proportionate to the anti-competitive effect of the concentration .
For at opnå en retfærdig anvendelse af forordningens bestemmelser er det nødvendigt at sikre, at de foranstaltninger, Kommissionen træffer under udøvelsen af fusionskontrollen, respekterer et princip om rimelighed og proportionalitet i forhold til graden af den konkurrenceskade, der er sket eller vil kunne ske.
In order to implement the provisions of the Regulation fairly, it should be ensured that the merger control measures taken by the Commission respect a principle of reasonableness as regards the seriousness of the damage to competition which has been or may be caused.
Ændringsforslag 15 Artikel 9, stk. 2, litra a
Amendment 15 Article 9, paragraph 2 (a)
a) en fusion mærkbart påvirker konkurrencen på et marked i denne medlemsstat, der på enhver måde fremstår som et særskilt marked, eller
(a) a concentration significantly affects competition on a market within that Member State, which presents all the characteristics of a distinct market, or
a) en fusion truer med at skabe eller styrke en dominerende stilling, således at den faktiske konkurrence bliver hæmmet på afgørende måde på et marked i denne medlemsstat, der på enhver måde fremstår som et særskilt marked,
(a) a concentration is in danger of creating or reinforcing a dominant position as a result of which actual competition will be significantly hampered on a market within that Member State, which presents all the characteristics of a distinct market, or
På baggrund af de stadig store forskelle i de nationale bestemmelser og den deraf følgende fare for retsusikkerhed, forsinkelse af procedurer og større administrative byrder er en vækst i antallet af henvisninger fra Kommissionen til medlemsstaterne ikke ønskelig.
In the light of the major differences which still persist in national provisions and the consequent danger of legal uncertainty, delays in procedures and additional administrative burdens, it is not desirable that the number of referrals by the Commission to Member States should increase.
Den oprindelige tekst i artikel 9, stk. 2, litra a), bør derfor bevares.
The old text of Article 9(2)(a) should therefore be retained.
Ændringsforslag 16 Artikel 9, stk. 2 a (nyt)
Amendment 16 Article 9, paragraph 2a (new)
Meddelelsen fra medlemsstaterne, som omhandlet i artikel 9, stk. 2, omfatter en begrundelse med anførelse af de nationale fusionsbestemmelser, der lægges til grund for antagelsen, at fusionen mærkbart påvirker konkurrencen på et marked i denne medlemsstat, og de konkrete foranstaltninger, som konkurrencemyndighederne i denne medlemsstat agter at træffe i tilfælde af en henvisning.
Notification of Member States pursuant to Article 9, paragraph 2 shall be accompanied by a statement setting out which national provisions on mergers give grounds for assuming that the concentration would significantly affect competition on a market in that Member State and which effective measures the competition authorities of that Member State intend to take in the event of a referral.
Da kriteriet om dominerende stilling falder bort ved Kommissionens henvisning til medlemsstater, der anmoder herom, kan der opstå den situation, at en medlemsstat har bedt om at få henvist sagen, men ikke er i stand til at tackle den efter den nationale fusionsprocedure og at fusionskontrollen dermed bliver virkningsløs.
Since the criterion of market domination has been dropped in the case of a referral by the Commission to applicant Member States, the situation may arise where, although a Member State has requested a referral back, it does not manage the process in accordance with its own national merger procedure and the merger control therefore becomes void.
Denne bestemmelse skal give Kommissionen mere information om de nationale myndigheders vurderingskriterier og den procedure, de agter at følge efter henvisningen.
The provision should give the Commission more information concerning the assessment criteria of the national authorities and their intended course of action following referral.
Desuden imødegår den "overilede" anmodninger om henvisning fra de nationale myndigheder og tilsigter en ensartet vurderingsramme.
In addition, it prevents overhasty requests for referral from the national authorities and aims for uniform assessment criteria.
Ændringsforslag 17 Artikel 9, stk. 3
Amendment 17 Article 9, paragraph 3
Finder Kommissionen under hensyn til markedet for de pågældende varer og tjenester og til det geografiske referencemarked, jf. stk. 7, at der foreligger et sådant specifikt marked
If the Commission considers that, having regard to the market for the products or services in question and the geographical reference market within the meaning of paragraph 7, there is such a distinct market, either:
Finder Kommissionen under hensyn til markedet for de pågældende varer og tjenester og til det geografiske referencemarked, jf. stk. 7, at der foreligger et sådant specifikt marked og en sådan trussel
If the Commission considers that, having regard to the market for the products or services in question and the geographical reference market within the meaning of paragraph 7, there is such a distinct market and that such a threat exists , either:
a) behandler den enten selv sagen i overensstemmelse med denne forordning, eller
(a) it shall itself deal with the case in accordance with this Regulation; or
b) henviser den hele sagen eller en del af den til de kompetente myndigheder i den pågældende medlemsstat, således at dennes nationale konkurrencelovgivning kan finde anvendelse.
(b) it shall refer the whole or part of the case to the competent authorities of the Member State concerned with a view to the application of that State's national legislation on competition.
Finder Kommissionen derimod, at der ikke foreligger et sådant særskilt marked, vedtager den en beslutning herom, som den retter til den pågældende medlemsstat, og behandler selv sagen i overensstemmelse med denne forordning.
If, however, the Commission considers that such a distinct market does not exist it shall adopt a decision to that effect which it shall address to the Member State concerned, and shall itself deal with the case in accordance with this Regulation.
Finder Kommissionen derimod, at der ikke foreligger et sådant særskilt marked eller en sådan trussel , vedtager den en beslutning herom, som den retter til den pågældende medlemsstat, og behandler selv sagen i overensstemmelse med denne forordning.
If, however, the Commission considers that such a distinct market or threat does not exist it shall adopt a decision to that effect which it shall address to the Member State concerned, and shall itself deal with the case in accordance with this Regulation.
I mangel af en anmodning fra parterne i henhold til artikel 4, stk. 4, bør Kommissionen kun henvise hele sagen eller en del af sagen til de kompetente myndigheder i en medlemsstat, der fremsætter anmodning herom, hvis den finder, at der foreligger en trussel om, at fusionen skaber eller styrker en dominerende stilling, således at den faktiske konkurrence bliver hæmmet på afgørende måde på et marked i denne medlemsstat, der på enhver måde fremstår som et særskilt marked.
In the absence of a request by the parties pursuant to Article 4 (4), the Commission should only refer the whole or part of a case to the competent authorities of a requesting Member State when it considers that there exists a threat that a concentration will create or strengthen a dominant position as a result of which effective competition will be significantly impeded on a market within that Member State which presents all the characteristics of a distinct market.
Ændringer i kriterierne for henvisning til medlemsstater, som letter sådanne henvisninger, når der ikke foreligger en anmodning i henhold til artikel 4, stk. 4, er uønskede og unødvendige.
Changes to the criteria for referrals to Member States which facilitate such referrals in the absence of a request pursuant to Article 4 (4) are undesirable and unnecessary.
Nationale myndigheder anvender deres nationale konkurrencelovgivning, og henvisninger til nationale myndigheder øger usikkerheden og skaber proceduremæssige vanskeligheder og forsinkelser, som generelt bør undgås, når der ikke foreligger en konkret anmodning i henhold til artikel 4, stk. 4.
National authorities apply their national legislation on competition, and referrals to national authorities increase uncertainty and cause procedural difficulties and delays which generally should be avoided in the absence of an explicit request pursuant to Article 4 (4).
Ændringsforslag 18 Artikel 9, stk. 3, litra b
Amendment 18Article 9, paragraph 3, point (b)
(b) henviser den hele sagen eller en del af den til de kompetente myndigheder i den pågældende medlemsstat, således at dennes nationale konkurrencelovgivning kan finde anvendelse.
(b) it shall refer the whole or part of the case to the competent authorities of the Member State concerned with a view to the application of that State's national legislation on competition.
(b) henviser den sagen til de kompetente myndigheder i den pågældende medlemsstat, således at dennes nationale konkurrencelovgivning kan finde anvendelse.
(b) it shall refer the case to the competent authorities of the Member State concerned with a view to the application of that State's national legislation on competition.
Henvisning er ikke muligt, når fusionen behandles efter den forenklede procedure.
However, there shall be possibility of referral in cases where the concentration is subject to the simplified procedure.