natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
På mødet den 1. september 2003 meddelte Parlamentets formand, at dette forslag var henvist til Udvalget om Regionalpolitik, Transport og Turisme som korresponderende udvalg ( C5‑0366/2003 ).
At the sitting of 1 September 2003 the President of Parliament announced that he had referred the proposal to the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism as the committee responsible ( C5‑0366/2003 ).
På mødet den 10. september 2003 valgte udvalget Bernard Poignant til ordfører.
The Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism appointed Bernard Poignant rapporteur at its meeting of 10 September 2003.
På møder den 4. og 25. november 2003 behandlede det Kommissionens forslag og udkastet til betænkning.
The committee considered the Commission proposal and draft report at its meetings of 4 and 25 November 2003.
På sidstnævnte møde vedtog det forslaget til lovgivningsmæssig beslutning (for: 43; imod: 5; hverken/eller: 0).
At the last meeting it adopted the draft legislative resolution by 43 votes to 5.
Til stede under afstemningen var: Paolo Costa (formand), Gilles Savary (næstformand), Helmuth Markov (næstformand), Bernard Poignant (ordfører), Sylviane H. Ainardi, Emmanouil Bakopoulos, Rolf Berend, Graham H. Booth (for Rijk van Dam), Philip Charles Bradbourn, Luigi Cocilovo, Christine de Veyrac, Jan Dhaene, Den Dover (for José Javier Pomés Ruiz), Garrelt Duin, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu J.H. Grosch, Konstantinos Hatzidakis, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Roger Helmer (for Carlos Ripoll y Martínez de Bedoya), Juan de Dios Izquierdo Collado, Georg Jarzembowski, Karsten Knolle (for Felipe Camisón Asensio), Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Giorgio Lisi, Nelly Maes, Sérgio Marques, Emmanouil Mastorakis, Erik Meijer, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Bill Miller (for Danielle Darras), Enrique Monsonís Domingo, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Peter Pex, Wilhelm Ernst Piecyk, Samuli Pohjamo, Alonso José Puerta, Reinhard Rack, Ingo Schmitt, Elisabeth Schroedter (for Camilo Nogueira Román), Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Margie Sudre, Hannes Swoboda (for John Hume), Ari Vatanen, Herman Vermeer, Dominique Vlasto (for Francesco Musotto) og Mark Francis Watts..
The following were present for the vote: Paolo Costa (chairman), Gilles Savary (vice-chairman), Helmuth Markov (vice-chairman), Bernard Poignant (rapporteur), Sylviane H. Ainardi, Emmanouil Bakopoulos, Rolf Berend, Graham H. Booth (for Rijk van Dam), Philip Charles Bradbourn, Luigi Cocilovo, Christine de Veyrac, Jan Dhaene, Den Dover (for José Javier Pomés Ruiz), Garrelt Duin, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu J.H. Grosch, Konstantinos Hatzidakis, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Roger Helmer (for Carlos Ripoll y Martínez de Bedoya), Juan de Dios Izquierdo Collado, Georg Jarzembowski, Karsten Knolle (for Felipe Camisón Asensio), Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Giorgio Lisi, Nelly Maes, Sérgio Marques, Emmanouil Mastorakis, Erik Meijer, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Bill Miller (for Danielle Darras), Enrique Monsonís Domingo, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Peter Pex, Wilhelm Ernst Piecyk, Samuli Pohjamo, Alonso José Puerta, Reinhard Rack, Ingo Schmitt, Elisabeth Schroedter (for Camilo Nogueira Román), Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Margie Sudre, Hannes Swoboda (for John Hume), Ari Vatanen, Herman Vermeer, Dominique Vlasto (for Francesco Musotto) and Mark Francis Watts.
FORSLAG TIL EUROPA-PARLAMENTETS LOVGIVNINGSMÆSSIGE BESLUTNING om forslag til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning om overflytning af fragt- og passagerskibe mellem registrene i Fællesskabet ( KOM(2003) 478 – C5‑0366/2003 – 2003/0180(COD))
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation on the transfer of cargo and passenger ships between registers within the Community ( COM(2003) 478 – C5‑0366/2003 – 2003/0180(COD))
– der henviser til Kommissionens forslag til Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet ( KOM(2003) 478 ) Endnu ikke offentliggjort i EUT. ,
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003) 478 ) Not yet published in OJ. ,
– der har fået forslaget forelagt af Kommissionen, jf. EF-traktatens artikel 251, stk. 2, og artikel 80, stk. 2, ( C5‑0366/2003 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 80(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C5‑0366/2003 ),
– der henviser til betænkning fra Udvalget om Regionalpolitik, Transport og Turisme ( A5‑0413/2003 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism ( A5‑0413/2003 ),
Kommissionens forslag Ændringsforslag Ændringsforslag 1 Betragtning 8 a (ny)
Text proposed by the Commission Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Det er hensigtsmæssigt, at skibe, der fører en medlemsstats flag, lettere identificeres i og uden for Den Europæiske Union.
(8a) Ships sailing under the flag of a Member State ought to be more easily identifiable within and outside the European Union.
I stedet for at oprette et europæisk skibsregister og for at sikre bedre identifikation af skibene bør skibe, der er registreret i en medlemsstat, udstyres med EU-symbolet i øverste hjørne af flaget, lige som på EU-nummerplader til biler.
For improved identification, instead of creating a European register ships registered in a Member State ought to display the emblem of the European Union in a corner of their flags, much as Community vehicles already do on their registration plates.
Ændringsforslag 2 Artikel 1 a (ny)
Amendment 2 Article 1 a (new)
Skibe, der er registreret i en medlemsstat, fører EU-symbolet - tolv gule stjerner i en cirkel på blå baggrund - i øverste hjørne af flaget.
Ships registered in a Member State shall display the emblem of the European Union, i.e. a circle of 12 gold stars on a square blue background, in a corner of their flags.
Ændringsforslag 3 Artikel 8, stk. 1 a (nyt)
Amendment 3 Article 8, paragraph 1a (new)
Senest den .... * forelægger Kommissionen bl.a. på grundlag af medlemsstaternes rapporter en beretning for Europa-Parlamentet og Rådet om anvendelsen af denne forordning.
Not later than ......* the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of this Regulation, based in part on the reports submitted by the Member States.
I denne beretning vurderer Kommissionen bl.a., om det er hensigtsmæssigt at ændre forordningen.
In this report, the Commission shall assess, inter alia, whether it is appropriate to amend the Regulation.
* Fire år efter forordningens ikrafttrædelse.
* four years after the entry into force of the Regulation
Med dette ændringsforslag garanteres det, at Parlamentet og Rådet kan holde øje med gennemførelsen og håndhævelsen af denne forordning og de konsekvenser, som udvidelsen af Unionen har for håndhævelsen og for overflytningen af skibe mellem registre i Unionen.
This amendment ensures that Parliament and the Council are able to monitor the implementation and enforcement of this Regulation and the consequences of enlargement of the Union for enforcement and for the transfer of ships between registers within the Union.
Ethvert skib er opført i et nationalt register og sejler dermed under det pågældende lands flag.
All ships are registered under a national register and fly the flag of the country concerned.
Redere kan ud fra drifts- eller skattetekniske overvejelser have interesse i at lade deres skibe udflage og opføre i et andet register.
For operational or tax and financial reasons, shipowners may wish to re-flag their ships, transferring them to another register.
For at mindske de administrative byrder ved overflytning inden for Unionen af hensyn til et velfungerende indre marked vedtog Rådet i 1991 forordning 613/91.
In order to reduce the administrative costs involved in re-flagging within the Union and with a view to ensuring the smooth functioning of the internal market, the Council adopted Regulation 613/91 in 1991.
I medfør af denne forordning afstod medlemsstaterne deres ret til at nægte registrering af fragtskibe, der er registreret i andre medlemsstater, og som opfylder alle relevante IMO-krav.
Under the Regulation, Member States gave up the right to withhold from registration cargo ships registered in other Member States complying with all relevant IMO requirements.
Disse skibe kan registreres under et andet europæisk flag alene på den betingelse, at den nye flagstats søfartsmyndigheder eventuelt inspicerer skibene for at konstatere, at deres faktiske tilstand er i overensstemmelse med den i attesterne anførte tilstand.
Such ships may thus be transferred to another European flag subject only to possible inspection by the maritime authority of the receiving flag state aimed at confirming that their actual condition corresponds to their certificates.
De resterende uoverensstemmelser mellem medlemsstaterne om fortolkningen af de krav og bestemmelser, som i konventionerne overlades til parternes skøn, henvises derefter til afgørelse i Kommissionen, der bistås af et udvalg bestående af repræsentanter fra medlemsstaterne.
Residual divergences among Member States as to the interpretation of the requirements and provisions that the Conventions leave to the discretion of the parties thereto are referred to the Commission for a decision, taken with the assistance of a committee of representatives of the Member States.
Med det foreliggende kommissionsforslag tilsigtes der en ajourføring og ændring af den i 1991 vedtagne forordning.
The purpose of the Commission proposal is to bring up to date and amend the regulation adopted in 1991.
Forordningen ændres på tre punkter:
The regulation concerned has been amended in three areas:
Udvidelse af forordningens anvendelsesområde til også at omfatte passagerskibe
The Commission is proposing to widen the scope of the regulation to include passenger ships.
Kommissionen foreslår, at forordningens anvendelsesområde udvides til også at omfatte passagerskibe, som i 1991 blev holdt uden for forordningen, fordi der dengang stadig gjaldt mange forskellige nationale konstruktionstekniske og andre krav til disse skibe.
In 1991 it was decided not to include them, as they were still subject at that time to many different national construction and other requirements.
I mellemtiden er både de internationale og de europæiske forskrifter for passagerskibe blevet skærpet og finpudset, og derfor må denne hindring siges at være afhjulpet.
Since then both the international and European regime for passenger ships has been strengthened and refined, which has removed this difficulty.
Det har desuden vist sig, at redere i praksis konfronteres med betydelige problemer, når de ønsker at overflytte passagerskibe mellem registre i medlemsstaterne.
In addition, it has become apparent that shipowners encounter considerable problems in practice when transferring passenger ships between registers of Member States.
Det foreliggende forslag finder anvendelse på passagerskibe, der er bygget efter den 1. juli 1998 eller tidligere, og som har fået udstedt en attest, hvoraf det fremgår, at de opfylder de relevante europæiske krav og IMO-kravene (f.eks. SOLAS).
This proposal applies to passenger ships built on or after 1 July 1998, or built before that date but certified as complying with the relevant European and IMO requirements (for example, under SOLAS).
Sammenhængen med anden fællesskabslovgivning for søfartssikkerhed
Coherence with other Community maritime safety instruments
Siden 1991 er der vedtaget flere nye europæiske regler for søfartssikkerhed.
Since 1991 a great deal of new European legislation has been adopted in the area of maritime safety.
I den ændrede forordning henvises der om nødvendigt til disse regler for på denne måde at sikre en fornuftig indbyrdes sammenhæng mellem de forskellige europæiske regler (f.eks. Erika I og II)
In the amended regulation, reference is made where necessary to such legislation in order to ensure proper links between the various European instruments (for example, the Erika I and II packages).
Forbedring af samarbejdet mellem de nationale søfartsmyndigheder
Strengthening of cooperation between national maritime authorities
I forordning 613/91 er det fastsat, at et skib først kan overflyttes til en anden medlemsstats register, når det har været i aktiv drift under en medlemsstats flag i mindst seks måneder.
Regulation 613/91 stipulates that ships may be transferred to the register of another Member State only if they have been sailing under a Member State flag for six months.
I det foreliggende forslag erstattes denne noget vilkårlige "karantæneperiode" på seks måneder med en bestemmelse, som i højere grad ligger på linje med global praksis.
Under the current proposal, this rather arbitrary six-month 'quarantine' is to be replaced by a provision more in keeping with international practice.
Dertil kræves der imidlertid et bedre samarbejde mellem de søfartsmyndigheder, som er involveret i overflytning af skibe mellem registre inden for Unionen.
This calls for improved cooperation between the maritime authorities involved in the transfer of a ship from one register to another within the Union.
Det forventes, at dette vil lette overgangen mellem registrene og bidrage til, at eventuelle inspektioner hurtigere kan foretages af søfartsmyndighederne i de nye registreringsland.
It is anticipated that this will further facilitate transfers between registers and help enable possible inspection by the maritime authority in charge of the receiving register to be carried out more quickly.
Ordføreren glæder sig over det foreliggende kommissionsforslag, som forventes at sætte en stopper for den forskellige udlægning af konventioner og dermed bidrage til retssikkerheden.
Your rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal, which it is anticipated will put an end to differences of interpretation of the Conventions and thus help ensure legal certainty.
Desuden forenkler det procedurerne for overflytning af passagerskibe, hvilket igen giver færre administrative byrder inden for Unionen.
In addition, the proposal simplifies the procedures for re-flagging of passenger ships, which will lead to a reduction in the regulatory burden within the Union.
Samtidig garanteres kontrollen af sikkerhedsaspekter, da den foreslåede procedurer omfatter udveksling af oplysninger mellem de registerførende myndigheder, således at der om nødvendigt kan foretages supplerende kontrol.
At the same time, controls on safety aspects are ensured, the proposed procedure providing for exchange of information between those in charge of registers and if necessary for additional inspections.
Netop nu da udvidelsen af Den Europæiske Union med ti nye medlemslande står for døren, er det vigtigt med en entydig og ukompliceret ordning, som kan garantere et højt sikkerhedsniveau.
Particularly in view of the imminent enlargement of the European Union to include 10 new Member States, a clear and simple regime ensuring a high level of safety is important.
Ulykken med Prestige har endnu en gang understreget betydningen af en fornuftig gennemførelse og håndhævelse af søfartsbestemmelserne.
The Prestige accident has once again highlighted the importance of properly implementing and enforcing maritime legislation.
Europa-Parlamentet er mere end nogensinde overbevist om, at tilvejebringelsen af nye regler kun giver mening, hvis både eksisterende og nye regler også blive nøje håndhævet.
Parliament is more than ever convinced that it only makes sense to introduce new legislation if the existing as well as the new rules are strictly enforced.
Optagelsen af ti nye medlemstater er en yderligere årsag til at holde godt øje med, hvordan reglerne anvendes inden for den udvidede Union.
The accession of 10 new Member States is a further reason for keeping a close watch on how the rules are implemented within the enlarged Union.
Det vil desuden være nyttigt om nogle år at danne sig et billede af, hvad udvidelsen har betydet for de skibe, som sejler under de forskellige medlemsstaters flag.
In addition, it will be useful to be able to form a picture in a few years' time of what enlargement has meant for ships flying the flag of the various Member States.
Ordføreren glæder sig da også over, at Kommissionen pålægger medlemsstaterne en rapporteringsforpligtelse, som bl.a. omfatter fremsendelse af statistiske data om overflytning af skibe.
Your rapporteur therefore welcomes the obligation which the Commission places on the Member States to provide information, including statistical data on the transfer of ships.
Til ordførerens store forbløffelse har Kommissionen hidtil haft så godt som intet kendskab til antallet af skibe, der i de forløbne år er blevet overflyttet.
To your rapporteur's great surprise, the Commission scarcely has any information to date on the numbers of ships that have re-flagged in recent years.
I den af ordføreren udarbejdede udvalgsbetænkning kan det ligeledes undersøges, om det på grundlag af de indhøstede erfaringer vil være på sin plads at ændre forordningen.
The Commission report which is being proposed by your rapporteur could also look, based on experience, at whether it is appropriate to amend the regulation.
Etablering af et europæisk skibsregister?
A single European register of shipping?
"glæder sig over Kommissionens positive holdning med hensyn til de skattemæssige foranstaltninger, der er truffet i visse medlemsstater for at fremme genindflagning under europæisk flag; opfordrer indtrængende medlemsstaterne til at sikre, at der er tilstrækkelig administrativ kapacitet til at muliggøre genindflagning og indføre en streng flagstatskontrol; opfordrer Kommissionen og medlemsstaterne til at genoverveje etablering af et europæisk skibsregister ".
'Welcomes the Commission's favourable position on the fiscal measures adopted by certain Member States to encourage a return to flying European flags; urges Member States to make every effort to ensure full administrative capacity to enable such re-flagging and to introduce stringent monitoring of flag-issuing states; calls on the Commission and Member States to give renewed consideration to establishing a European register of shipping ;'
Allerede i 1989 forelagde Kommissionen et forslag om etablering af et europæisk skibsregister benævnt "EUROS".
In 1989 the Commission had put forward a proposal to establish a European register of shipping, the 'EUROS' register.
Forslaget betød, at der skulle indføres et supplement til de eksisterende nationale skibsregistre.
It was proposed that this should supplement the existing national registers.
EUROS-registret skulle ved hjælp af gunstige skatteregler gøre det attraktivt for rederne at sejle under EUROS-flaget og derved modvirke udflagning til registre i tredjelande.
The EUROS register would have to offer favourable tax conditions in order to make it attractive to shipowners to fly the EUROS flag and in order to counter the problem of 'outflagging' to registers of third countries.
Desuden ville et skattemæssigt gunstigt europæisk register overflødiggøre den skattemæssige konkurrence mellem medlemsstaterne og på denne måde afhjælpe den deraf følgende eventuelle konkurrencefordrejning.
In addition, a single European register providing favourable tax conditions would make tax competition between the Member States and the possible resulting distortion of competition redundant.
Et yderligere argument for EUROS-registret var at styrke den europæiske søfartssektors image.
An additional argument for establishing the EUROS register was that it would improve the image of the European maritime sector.
Rådet afviste i sin tid meget resolut EUROS-registret, da det efter medlemsstaternes opfattelse ville gribe for meget ind i nationale beføjelser på skatteområdet.
The Council at that time strongly rejected the EUROS proposal, which in the view of the Member States was too great an infringement of national competence in the area of taxation.
Udflagningsproblemet er senere blevet mere eller mindre afhjulpet, idet Kommissionen har vedtaget retningslinjer for statsstøtte til søfartssektoren, der på den ene side åbnede mulighed for at give skibe, der sejler under medlemsstaternes flag, en gunstig national behandling i skattemæssig forstand, op på den anden side imødegik uacceptabel indbyrdes konkurrencefordrejning.
The problem of outflagging was subsequently partly rectified following the adoption by the Commission of guidelines on state aid for the maritime sector, which, on the one hand, permitted favourable national tax treatment of ships flying the flag of a Member State and, on the other hand, countered unacceptable distortion of competition between states.
Ordføreren konstaterer, at også det daværende problem med storstilet udflagning af skibe for en stor dels vedkommende er afhjulpet gennem ovennævnte retningslinjer for statsstøtte til søfartssektoren.
Your rapporteur wishes to point out therefore that the problem caused at that time by outflagging of ships on a huge scale has to a large extent been rectified by the aforementioned guidelines.
Det foreliggende forslag om overflytning mellem registre vil medføre yderligere forbedring af samarbejdet mellem medlemsstaternes registre.
The current proposal on transfers between registers will lead to a further improvement in cooperation between Member State registers.
Ordføreren sætter da også spørgsmålstegn ved den formodede nødvendighed af at etablere et europæisk skibsregister.
Your rapporteur therefore questions the supposed necessity of establishing a European register.
Ordføreren finder lige så lidt, at etableringen af et sådant register vil være et egnet virkemiddel til at garantere et højt sikkerhedsniveau i den europæiske handelsflåde.
Your rapporteur also does not see the introduction of such a register as the appropriate means of ensuring a high level of safety for the European fleet.
Dertil findes der andre og bedre midler som f.eks. den af Kommissionen bebudede ordning i Erika III-pakken om fastsættelse af minimumskriterier for europæiske skibsregistre.
There are better ways of doing this, such as the rules on the establishment of minimum criteria for European registers of shipping, announced by the Commission as part of the Erika III package.
Ordføreren opfordrer Kommissionen til at forelægge forslag herom snarest muligt.
Your rapporteur is calling on the Commission to present a relevant proposal as soon as possible.
I teorien vil erstatningen af de nationale registre med et enkelt europæisk register kunne føre til administrative besparelser i kraft af stordriftsfordelene.
In theory, the replacement of national registers by a single European register could lead to administrative costs being saved, thanks to benefits of scale.
Dette holder imidlertid kun stik, hvis det europæiske register erstatter de nationale registre helt og holdent, hvilket synes lidet realistisk.
However, this would only be the case if the European register were to completely replace the national registers, which does not seem feasible.
Hvis der kommer et parallelt register, vil der snarere blive tale om en nettoforøgelse af de administrative byrder.
If the registers exist alongside each other, it is more likely that there would be a net increase in administrative costs.
27. november 2003 ENDELIG A5-0414/2003 ***
27 November 2003 FINAL A5-0414/2003 ***
om afgørelse truffet af repræsentanterne for medlemsstaternes regeringer om meddelelse af decharge til generalsekretæren for Konventet om Den Europæiske Unions Fremtid for gennemførelsen af budgettet for regnskabsåret 2002
on the decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States concerning the discharge to be granted to the Secretary-General of the Convention in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2002