natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Et Innovationsnetværk opfylder definitionen på en klyngeorganisation og er en klyngeorganisation.
An Innovation Network complies with the definition of a cluster organisation and is a cluster organisation.
Formålet med Innovationsnetværk Danmark programmet er at etablere klyngeorganisationer, der er med til at give virksomhedsdeltagerne overblik over den nyeste viden, teknologi, forskning og udvikling på deres område og skabe samarbejdsprojekter, netværk og FUI-aktiviteter.
The purpose of the Innovation Network Denmark programme is to establish cluster organisations that will help give the enterprise participants an overview of the most recent knowledge, technology, research and development within their field and create collaboration projects, networks and research, development and innovation activities.
Innovationsnet- værkene får statslig medfinansiering fra Rådet for Teknologi og Innovation.
The Innovation Networks receive government funding from the Danish Council for Technology and Innovation.
For at blive godkendt som Innovationsnetværk skal klyngeorganisationen ansøge herom og opfylde et sæt af retningslinjer for at sikre, at organisationen tilbyder sine medlemmer så mange relevante klyngeservices som muligt.
In order to be approved as an Innovation Network, the cluster organisation must apply for this and comply with a set of guidelines in order to ensure that the organisation offers its members as many different cluster services as possible.
HVAD FORSTÅS VED POLITIK/INDSATS FOR KLYNGER OG NETVÆRK?
WHAT IS MEANT BY ‘POLICY FOR CLUSTERS AND INNOVATIVE NETWORKS’?
En indsats for klynger og netværk er de initiativer, det offentlige iværksætter for at styrke virksomheders innovation og konkurrenceevne gennem klynger og netværk, .
A policy for clusters and networks is the initiatives that are launched by public authorities in order to strengthen innovation and competitiveness of enterprises through clusters and networks.
I EU betegner klynge- og netværks- politik (”Cluster policy”) den politik og de dertil knyttede initiativer, der aktivt understøtter etablering og udvikling af klyngeorganisationer og netværksorganisationer.
In the EU, cluster policy denotes the policy and the associated initiatives that actively support the establishment and development of cluster organisations and network organisations.
I mange lande både i EU og resten af verden bliver ”cluster politikken” i dag anset for at udgøre en af de vigtige hjørnestene i innovationspolitikken.
In many countries, both in the EU and in the rest of the world, cluster policy is now considered to constitute one of the important cornerstones in the innovation policy.
Indsatsen for klynger og netværk understøttes typisk af et særligt regionalt eller nationalt klyngepro- gram, som medfinansierer etableringen af og aktiviteter for klynge- og netværksorganisationer til gavn for dens medlemmer og deltagere.
The policy for clusters and networks is typically supported by a special regional or national cluster programme, which co-funds the establishment of and activities for cluster and network organisations for the benefit of its members and participants.
Klynge- og netværkspolitikkens formål er at fremme konkurrenceevne, vækst og beskæftigelse gennem fokus på videnspredning, samarbejde, forskning, udvikling og innovation.
The objective of the cluster and network policy is to ensure competitiveness, growth and employment by focusing on knowledge dissemination, collaboration, research, development and innovation.
Balancen i aktiviteterne varierer mellem brancher og virksomhedssektorer, idet videnspredning, teknologi og innovation er mere centrale i nogle typer klynger og netværk, mens forskning og udvikling er hovedfokus i andre mere videntunge klynger og netværk.
The balance in the activities varies between industries and enterprise sectors, considering that knowledge dissemination, technology and innovation are more central to some types of clusters and networks than to others.
I Europa bruges forskellige betegnelser for de programmer, der understøtter skabelse af klynge- og netværksorganisationer: Klyngeprogram, program for innovationsnetværk, program for kompetencenetværk eller program for ekspertisecentre.
In Europe, various terms are used to describe the programmes that support the creation of cluster and network programmes: cluster programme, programme for innovation networks, programme for competence networks or programme for expertise centres.
En analyse viser, at programmerne uanset navn grundlæggende dækker over samme, type af politik og indsats.
One analysis shows that the programmes, regardless of their names, basically refer to the same policy.
– Nordic-German-Polish Cluster Benchmarking Project
APPENDIX 2.
BILAG 2. DEN INTERMINISTERIELLE OG INTERREGIONALE ARBEJDS-GRUPPE OM KLYNGE- OG NETVÆRKSINDSATSEN
THE INTER-MINISTERIAL AND INTER-REGIONAL WORKING GROUP ON THE CLUSTER AND NETWORK EFFORT
MINISTERIER
MINISTRIES
Thomas Alslev Christensen (formand), FIVU/Rådet for Teknologi og Innovation
Thomas Alslev Christensen (Chairman), the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Higher Education / the Danish Council for Technology and Innovation
Anders Ziegler Kusk, Styrelsen for Universiteter og Internationalisering/FIVU
Anders Ziegler Kusk, the Danish Agency for Universities and Internationalisation / the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Higher Education
Uffe Andreasen, Ministeriet for By, Bolig og Landdistrikter
Uffe Andreasen, the Ministry of Housing, Urban and Rural Districts
REGIONER
REGIONS
Lene Brinch Knudsen, Region Midtjylland
Lene Brinch Knudsen, Central Denmark Region
Tine Aage, Region Sjælland
Tine Aage, Region Zealand
Thomas Kampmann, Region Nordjylland
Thomas Kampmann, North Denmark Region
Olav Sønderskov, Region Syddanmark
Olav Sønderskov, Region of Southern Denmark
Ebbe Mosbæk Rasmussen, Region Hovedstaden
Ebbe Mosbæk Rasmussen, Capital Region of Denmark
Diana Lindahl, Vækstforum Bornholm
Diana Lindahl, Growth Forum Bornholm
Lars Albæk, Klyngeudvikling Bornholm (Væksthus Hovedstadsregionen)
Lars Albæk, Cluster Development Bornholm (Greater Copenhagen Growth Centre)
ØVRIGE ORGANISATIONER
OTHER ORGANISATIONS
Lone Vingtoft, Danske Regioner
Lone Vingtoft, Danish Regions
Anne Sofie Sørensen, Danske Regioner
Anne Sofie Sørensen, Danish Regions
Lotte Langkilde, REG X
Lotte Langkilde, REG X
Merete Daniel Nielsen, Netmatch
Merete Daniel Nielsen, Netmatch
Kim Bech, Copenhagen Capacity
Kim Bech, Copenhagen Capacity
DET FRIE FORSKNINGSRÅD
THE DANISH COUNCIL FOR INDEPENDENT RESEARCH
Fri forskning med effekt
Independent research with impact
Hovedtal for Det Frie Forskningsråd 2012
Key figures for The Danish Council for Independent Research, 2012
Postdocer med stjernepotentiale
6 Postdocs with star potential
DFF i 2012
9 The Danish Council for Independent Research in 2012
At teste modeller på fortiden
Testing models on the past
Når seje væsker størkner
When viscous liquids set
Med immunforsvaret på barrikaderne
18 On the barricades with the immune defence system
Året der gik i DFF 2012
22 Overview of activities in 2012
Det Frie Forskningsråds sekretariat
Secretariat of The Danish Council for Independent Research
Medlemmer af Det Frie Forskningsråd
Members of The Danish Council for Independent Research
Fri forskning med effekt‌
Independent research with impact
I det lys er det tilfreds­ stillende endnu en gang at kunne konstatere, at Det Frie Forskningsråds bevillinger fører til glimrende forskning og styrker et solidt dansk forskningsmiljø, der kan måle sig med de bedste internationalt.
Therefore, it is gratifying that it has been documented once again that the grants awarded by The Danish Council for Independent Research help to create excellent research and further strengthen the Danish research environments which ranks among the best internationally.
Ved udgangen af 2012 slog endnu en undersøgelse nemlig fast, at forskere støttet af Det Frie Forskningsråd klarer sig rigtig godt.
At the end of 2012, yet another evaluation demonstrated that researchers supported by The Danish Council for Independent Research produce impressive results.
Finansiering af postdocer har altid haft høj prioritet i Det Frie Forskningsråd.
Postdoc financing has always had a high priority in The Danish Council for Independent Research.
Igennem de seneste otte år har rådet finansieret omkring 2.300 postdocer.
Within the last eight years, the Council has financed approximately 2,300 postdocs.
Det er derfor glædeligt, at bevillingerne med al tydelighed højner forskningsniveauet og bidrager til at fastholde de mest talentfulde forskere på de danske universiteter.
Therefore, it is gratifying to see that the grants clearly contribute to an increased level of excellence of Danish research and to retaining the most talented researchers in the Danish universities.
Læs mere om resultaterne af evalueringen i artiklen Postdocer med stjernepotentiale på side 6.
To read more about the results of the evaluation, please see the article ‘Postdocs with star potential’ on page 6 in this Annual Report.
Rådets øvrige virkemidler giver sig også udslag i markante resultater og opdagelser.
The Council’s other instruments also lead to significant scientific results and discoveries.
Forskerkarriereprogrammet Sapere Aude blev endvidere for første gang udmøntet på alle tre niveauer: DFF­Ung Eliteforsker, DFF-Forskningsleder og DFF-Topforsker.
In addition, the research career programme Sapere Aude was for the first time implemented on all three levels, offering DFF-Research Talents, DFF-Starting Grants and DFF-Advanced Grants.
Rådet ser med glæde, at programmet opfylder sine formål: at styrke karriereveje, at finde og fastholde de bedste talenter i forskningen, og at øge internationalise­ ringen også hos de helt unge forskertalenter.
The Council is pleased to see that the programme fulfils its objectives of strengthening the career paths of researchers, finding and retaining the greatest research talents and increasing the internationalisation, also among the young research talents.
Rådet arbej­ der stadig på at sikre, at programmet også tiltrækker flere kvindelige forskertalenter, end det er tilfældet i dag.
The Council continues its effort of ensuring that the programme will attract more talented women researchers than today.
I 2012 har Det Frie Forskningsråd gjort en stor indsats for at lette forskernes arbejde i forbindelse med ansøg­ ning om forskningsmidler.
In 2012, The Danish Council for Independent Research has put a large effort into making the application process easier for researchers who apply for funding.
Det er især sket ved, at rådet har udarbejdet ét årligt opslag med et overskueligt antal virkemidler, der er fælles for de fem faglige råd.
Thus the Council has created one annual Call containing a more manageable range of instruments which are common to all the five research councils.
Formålet er at gøre ansøgningsmulighederne mere enkle og trans­ parente, så ansøgere kan koncentrere sig om at skrive så gode ansøgninger som muligt.
The objective is to make the application options simpler and more transparent, so that applicants may focus on writing the best possible applications.
I 2012 var Det Frie Forskningsråd endvidere initiativtager til udarbejdelse af en fælles Open Access­politik for de offentlige forskningsråd og fonde.
In 2012 The Danish Council for Independent Research was the driving force behind the preparation of a joint Open Access policy for public research councils and foundations in Denmark.
Politikken skal fremme allerede igangværende initiativer, der vil give fri adgang til flere af de offentligt finansierede forskningsresultater end i dag, hvilket vil kræve et samarbejde med forsknings­ institutioner og forlag.
The objective of the policy is to strengthen already existing initiatives to provide free access to a higher number of publicly financed research results than today, which will require an increased level of collaboration with research institutions and publishers.
Dette er en udvikling, der ligger i tråd med politikken i andre internationale forskningsråd og i EU.
This development corresponds with the line of policy adopted by other international research councils and the EU.
Initiativet til det verdensomspændende forskningsråd er taget af National Science Foundation, og med det arbejdes der på at udvikle en fælles forståelse for grundlæggende principper som videnskabelig redelighed og Open Access til forsk­ ningsresultater.
The initiative for the Global Research Council has been taken by the National Science Foundation, and the purpose of the collaboration is to establish a common understanding of basic principles such as academic honesty and Open Access to research results.
Professor Jens Christian Djurhuus afsluttede efter næsten seks år som bestyrelsesformand sin anden udpegnings­ periode ved årets udgang.
After almost 6 years as Chair of the Council’s Board of Directors, Professor, MD Jens Christian Djurhuus ended his second term of appointment at the end of 2012.
Under hans formandskab er der sket en markant udvikling i rådets aktiviteter og virke­ midler.
During his chairmanship there have been significant developments in the Council’s activities and instruments.
Blandt andet har rådet styrket sin profil betydeligt og har udviklet sine eksterne samarbejdsflader både nationalt og internationalt.
The Council has strengthened its profile considerably and extended its external collaborations, both nationally and internationally.
Uddannelsesminister Morten Østergaard takkede Jens Christian Djurhuus for den store indsats, han har gjort for dansk forskning som rådsmedlem, rådsformand og bestyrelsesformand gennem en meget lang årrække.
Danish Minister for Science, Innovation and Higher Education Morten Østergaard thanked Jens Christian Djurhuus for his tremendous effort for Danish research, carried out for many years in his various capacities as research council member, council chairman and not least as Chair of the Council’s Board of Directors.
Fra 1. januar 2013 er opgaven som bestyrelsesformand overtaget af undertegnede: professor Peter Munk Christiansen.
As from 1 January 2013, the position as Chair of the Board of Directors has been taken over by yours truly.
Peter Munk Christiansen
Professor Peter Munk Christiansen
Bestyrelsesformand for Det Frie Forskningsråd
Chairman of The Danish Council for Independent Research
Det Frie Forskningsråd er et uafhængigt råd, som sekretariatsbetjenes af Styrelsen for Forskning og Innovation.
The Danish Council for Independent Research is an independent council to which the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation serves as secretariat.
Rådet består af fem faglige råd og en bestyrelse.
The Council comprises five scientific research councils and a Board of Directors.
Det Frie Forskningsråd | Kultur og Kommunikation
The Danish Council for Independent Research | Humanities
Direktion
Executive Management
Center for Strategisk Forskning og Vækst
Centre for Strategic Research and Growth
DET FRIE FORSKNINGSRÅD I ALT
The Danish Council for Independent Research
Succesrate
Success rate 14%
Antal ansøgninger
Number of applications 2,925
Antal bevillinger
Number of grants 535
Succesrate
Success rate 18%
DFF | KULTUR OG KOMMUNIKATION
DFF | SOCIAL SCIENCES (FSE)
Ansøgt beløb, mio. kr.
Amount applied for (DKK million) 778
Bevilget beløb, mio. kr.
Amount granted (DKK million) 142
Antal ansøgninger
Number of applications 281
Antal bevillinger
Number of grants 70
Succesrate
Success rate 25%
Ansøgt beløb, mio. kr.
Amount applied for (DKK million) 1,317
Bevilget beløb, mio. kr.
Amount granted (DKK million) 170
Succesrate
Success rate 13%
Antal ansøgninger
Number of applications 438
Antal bevillinger
Number of grants 85
Succesrate
Success rate 19%
DFF | SUNDHED OG SYGDOM
DFF | MEDICAL SCIENCES (FSS)
Ansøgt beløb, mio. kr.
Amount applied for (DKK million) 2,377
Bevilget beløb, mio. kr.
Amount granted (DKK million) 324
Antal ansøgninger
Number of applications 969
Antal bevillinger
Number of grants 172
DFF | TEKNOLOGI OG PRODUKTION
DFF | NATURAL SCIENCES (FNU)
Succesrate
Success rate 15%
Antal ansøgninger
Number of applications 591
Antal ansøgninger
Number of applications 646
Antal bevillinger
Number of grants 94
FIGUR 1:
FIGURE 1:
Antal ansøgninger og antal bevillinger i Det Frie Forskningsråd 2004-2012.
Number of applications received and grants distributed by The Danish Council for Independent Research, 2004-2012.
1.000
1,000
2.659
2,659
1.002
1,002
2.675
2,675
FIGUR 2:
FIGURE 2:
Ansøgt og bevilget beløb i Det Frie Forskningsråd, 2004-2012 (mio. kr., faste priser 2012).
Amounts applied for and granted by The Danish Council for Independent Research, 2004-2012 (DKK million, fixed prices 2012).
9.000
9,000
4.735
4,735
1.007
1,007
4.998
4,998
5.394
5,394
6.086
6,086
1.060
1,060
7.943
7,943
1.157
1,157
10.497
10,497
1.272
1,272
9.824
9,824
1.282
1,282
9.378
9,378
1.188
1,188
8.908
8,908
1.253
1,253
FIGUR 3:
FIGURE 3:
Gennemsnitlige succesrater i Det Frie Forskningsråd, 2004-2012
Average success rates at The Danish Council for Independent Research, 2004-2012 (%).
Antal bevillinger/antal ansøgninger og bevilget beløb/ansøgt beløb
Success rates for applications and the amounts applied for.
Det Frie Forskningsråd modtog knap 3.000 ansøgninger i 2012 og kunne sætte 535 nye forskningsprojekter i
The Danish Council for Independent Research received just under 3,000 applications in 2012 and helped to launch 535 new research projects.
14 således konstatere, at rådet fortsat modtager mange ansøgninger af meget høj kvalitet, som det ikke er muligt at give bevillinger til.
14 connection it should be noted that DFF receives many applications of a high standard which, unfortunately, are not offered grants.
2005 2006
2005 2006
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Postdocer med stjernepotentiale
Postdocs with star potential
At sikre fremragende forskeruddannelse har været alfa og omega for Det Frie Forskningsråd, siden rådet blev etableret i sin nuværende form i 2004.
Since The Danish Council for Independent Research was established in its present form in 2004, ensuring excellence in the development of researchers has been a central objective.
Rådet ser det som en af sine fremmeste opgaver at spotte de aller­ dygtigste forskertalenter og sende dem godt på vej i forskerkarrieren med et postdocstipendium i ryggen.
The Council sees it as one of its principal tasks to spot the best research talents and help them along in their research careers through postdoc grants.
Til det formål har rådet gennem mange år haft to typer af postdocstipendier til uddeling til yngre forskere med en nylig erhvervet ph.d.­grad: de individuelle post­ docstipendier, der søges af postdoc­kandidaten selv, og de indlejrede postdocstipendier, der typisk søges af en hovedansøger på lektor/professorniveau og uddeles som led i et større forskningsprojekt.
For that purpose the Council has for several years operated with two types of postdoc grants intended for young researchers who have recently obtained a PhD: the individual postdoc grants, which have to be applied for personally by the postdoctoral candidate, and the embedded postdoc grants, which are typically applied for by a main applicant at an associate professor/professor level and awarded as part of a larger research project.
I perioden 2004­2012 har DFF i alt uddelt omkring 2.300 postdocbevillinger.
Between 2004-2012, DFF has awarded a total of approximately 2,300 postdoc grants.
Begge typer af stipendier har igennem årene ført til glimrende forskning og bragt et stort antal postdocer i faste stillinger på universiteterne.
Both types of grants have over the years facilitated research activities of a high quality and helped a large number of postdocs in getting permanent tenure at the universities.
I 2012 satte DFF sig dog for at undersøge, om der er forskel på, hvordan stipendiater med individuelt eller indlejret stipendium klarer sig.
In 2012 though, DFF decided to investigate if there are any discernible differences in how the recipients of individual and embedded postdoc grants get along in their research careers.
Opnår individuelt finansierede postdocer eksempelvis bedre og flere publikationer og citationer end postdocer med et indlejret postdocstipendium?
For instance, do postdocs financed through individual grants achieve more and better research publications and citations than postdocs with embedded grants?
Er de forskere, der får et individuelt postdocstipendium, mere selvstændige og dermed måske længere fremme i karrieren end de forskere, som modtager et indlejret postdocstipendium?
Are the researchers with individual postdoc grants generally more independent, and thus perhaps further ahead in their careers, than the researchers who are awarded embedded postdoc grants?
Klarer individuelt finansierede postdocer sig bedre på den internationale scene end postdocer finansieret ved hjælp af midler bundet i et større forskningsprojekt?
Are the individually financed postdocs better at establishing themselves internationally than the postdocs who receive grants which are awarded as part of a larger research project?
Stor efterspørgsel efter postdocstipendier
Postdoc grants in great demand
Baggrunden for at iværksætte undersøgelsen har været, at Det Frie Forskningsråd altid ønsker at uddele forskningsbevillinger på en måde, der er til størst gavn for dansk forskning.
The reason for carrying out such an evaluation has been that The Danish Council for Independent Research always strives to distribute its research grants in a manner that will be of the greatest possible benefit to Danish research.
Når det har været særlig påkrævet at undersøge effekten af netop postdocstipendierne, skyldes det ikke mindst, at antallet af ph.d.er er mere end fordoblet gennem de seneste fem år, hvilket har øget efterspørgslen på postdocbevillinger markant.
When it has been deemed particularly important to examine the effect of the postdoc grants, it is partly because the number of PhDs in Denmark has more than doubled over the last five years, which has led to a considerable increase in the demand for postdoc grants.
Da universiteternes finan­ siering af postdocer og adjunkter ikke har fulgt denne udvikling, er det i høj grad blevet en opgave for Det Frie Forskningsråd at sikre dansk forsknings vækstlag ved at selektere og finansiere de allerbedste forskertalenter.
As the universities’ own financing of postdocs and assistant professorships has not been able to keep up with this development, it has largely become the responsibility of The Danish Council for Independent Research to nourish the growth layer of Danish research by selecting and financing the very best research talents.
”Postdocstipendier er et af Det Frie Forskningsråds vigtigste virkemidler.
”The postdoc grants are among the most important instruments offered by The Danish Council for Independent Research.
Ikke bare er de afgørende for, at vi fortsat kan skabe banebrydende forskningsresultater i Danmark.
Not only are they vital in relation to our continued ability to create ground-breaking research results in Denmark.
De er også vigtige for universiteterne selv, fordi de skal kunne være sikre på, at den kvalitetsvurdering og selektering af postdocprojekterne, som DFF hvert år forestår, sikrer den fornødne originalitet og excellence i det danske forskningsmiljø.
They also play an important role in relation to the universities, because it is vital for them that the quality assessment and selection of postdoc projects which DFF carries out every year contributes to ensuring the necessary level of originality and excellence in the Danish research environment.
Det viser undersøgelsen med al tydelighed, at den gør”, siger bestyrelsesformand for Det Frie Forskningsråd Peter Munk Christiansen.
And the recent evaluation clearly shows that DFF’s quality assessment and selection process lives up to those requirements,” notes Peter Munk Christiansen, Chair of the Council’s Board of Directors.