natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Der foreslås en sproglig præcisering i forhold til § 2, stk.
A linguistic clarification is proposed in relation to Section 2, subs.
1, nr. 1, i den nuværende bekendtgørelse, sådan at det tydeliggøres, at sanktionsmuligheden som hidtil kun gælder i tilfælde, hvor den indklagede er ansat som forsker.
1, clause 1 of the present executive order so as to make it plain that, as hitherto, the sanction option applies only in cases where the defendant is employed as a researcher.
Præciseringen skal ses i sammenhæng med, at en orientering af den indklagedes arbejdsgiver om, at udvalgene har konstateret videnskabelig uredelighed i en konkret sag, kun forventes at være relevant, hvor stillingsindholdet tilsiger det.
This qualification needs to be seen in light of the fact that informing the defendant's employer that the Committees have ascertained scientific dishonesty in a specific case is expected to be relevant only where militated by the substance of the position held.
3. Bestemmelsen er en videreførelse af § 9, stk.
3. The provision is a continuation of Section 9, subs.
5, i den nuværende bekendtgørelse.
5 of the present executive order.
Det foreslås således, at formanden for UVVU også fremover træffer afgørelse i retlige spørgsmål.
It is thus proposed that the chairperson of DCSD should make a ruling in legal matters in future too.
Bestemmelsen skal ses i sammenhæng med forslagets § 32, stk.
The provision needs to be seen in the context of Section 32, subs.
2, hvorefter formanden som landsdommer forudsættes at besidde den nødvendige ekspertise i retlige spørgsmål.
2 of the bill, according to which the chairperson, as a high court judge, is required to command the requisite expertise in matters of law.
4. Bestemmelsen er en videreførelse af § 7, i den nuværende bekendtgørelse, hvorefter UVVU skal offentliggøre en årlig beretning om deres virksomhed, hvori samtlige behandlede sager om videnskabelig uredelighed beskrives.
4. The provision is a continuation of Section 7 of the present executive order, according to which DCSD must publish an annual report detailing its activities, describing all cases dealt with that concern scientific dishonesty.
Af retssikkerhedsmæssige årsager forudsættes det, at beskrivelsen som hidtil sker i ikke-personhenførbar form
For reasons of due legal process, it is presupposed that the description will, as previously, be in some non-personalised form.
1, i den nuværende bekendtgørelse består UVVU af tre udvalg for henholdsvis naturvidenskabelig, jordbrugs- og veterinærvidenskabelig og teknisk-videnskabelig forskning, sundhedsvidenskabelig forskning samt samfundsvidenskabelig og humanistisk forskning.
1 of the present executive order, DCSD consists of three committees for research in natural science, agricultural & veterinary science and technical science, for research in health and medical science, and for research in social science and the humanities, respectively.
For at sikre den mest hensigtsmæssige organisatoriske indretning af UVVU foreslås det at give mulighed for en større fleksibilitet i fastlæggelsen af den fremtidige organisering, sådan at UVVU kan bestå af ét eller flere udvalg.
In order to ensure the most appropriate organisational arrangement of DCSD, it is proposed that scope be provided for greater flexibility in determining the future organisation, such that DCSD can consist of one or more committees.
Der henvises desuden til bemærkningerne til forslagets § 33.
Reference is further made to the explanatory notes on Section 33 of the bill.
Kriteriet om, at alle videnskabelige forskningsområder skal være dækket, opretholdes.
The criterion that all fields of scientific research must be covered will be upheld.
Baggrunden for kravet om, at formanden skal være landsdommer, er at sikre den juridiske ekspertise i UVVU, hvis sanktionskompetencer kan have store konsekvenser for den enkelte forsker.
The background to the requirement that the chairperson must be a high court judge is to assure the legal expertise at DCSD, whose sanctioning powers can assume great consequences for the individual researcher.
Der henvises desuden til bemærkningerne til forslagets §§ 1, stk.
Reference is also made to the explanatory notes on Section 1, subs.
3. Bestemmelsen er en følge af stk.
3. The provision is consequential to subs.
1, idet et hensigtsmæssigt antal medlemmer og suppleanter vil bero på antallet af udvalg.
1, in that a suitable number of members and alternates will depend on the number of committees.
Bindingen til to, fire eller seks medlemmer med en suppleant for hver i § 8, stk.
It is thus proposed removing the commitment to two, four or six members with an alternate for each in Section 8, subs.
Kriteriet om medlemmernes og suppleanternes kompetencer opretholdes.
The criterion about the members' and the alternates' powers is upheld.
2, 3. pkt. og stk.
2, clause 3 and subs.
3 og 4, i den nuværende bekendtgørelse videreført.
3 and 4 of the present executive order.
Forslaget om, at det fremover er videnskabsministeren, der udpeger formanden, medlemmerne og suppleanterne, er en ordensmæssig følge af forslagets § 1, stk.
The proposal that the Minister of Science be the one to appoint the chairperson, members and alternates in future is a law-enforcement consequence of Section 1, subs.
5. Bestemmelsen er en indholdsmæssig videreførelse af § 12, stk.
5. The provision is a substantive continuation of Section 12, subs.
2, i den nuværende bekendtgørelse, dog sådan at det fremover er videnskabsministeren, der som en ordensmæssig følge af forslagets § 1, stk.
2 of the present executive order, but such that in future it will be the Minister of Science who approves the rules of procedure as a law-enforcement consequence of Section 1, subs.
I den nuværende bekendtgørelse er der fastsat en række regler for UVVU's virke m.v. Som følge af at udvalgene foreslås oprettet direkte med hjemmel i dette lovforslag, jf. forslagets § 1, stk.
The present executive order lays down a series of rules for DCSD's activities etc. Given the proposal to set up the Committees with authority directly invested by this bill, cf. Section 1, subs.
2, foreslås det at bemyndige videnskabsministeren til i bekendtgørelsesform at fastlægge sådanne nærmere regler.
2 of the bill, it is proposed authorising the Minister of Science to lay down such rules in more detail in the form of an executive order.
De hidtidige erfaringer med arbejdet i UVVU og den offentlige debat i forbindelse med udvalgenes seneste afgørelse af 6. januar 2003 har givet anledning til en vurdering af, om der er behov for en revidering af kriterierne for at statuere videnskabelig uredelighed efter § 3, i den nuværende bekendtgørelse.
Experience to date from work at DCSD and the public debate in connection with the Committees' latest ruling of 6 January 2003 has resulted in assessing whether there is any need to revise the criteria for establishing scientific dishonesty under Section 3 of the present executive order.
Resultaterne af denne vurdering vil afspejle sig i en kommende bekendtgørelse.
The results of this evaluation will be reflected in a future order.
Tilsvarende vil antallet af udvalg samt medlemmer og suppleanter blive fastsat i en sådan bekendtgørelse, jf. forslagets § 32, stk.
Correspondingly, the number of committees as well as members and alternates will be fixed in such an order, cf. Section 32, subs.
Med denne bestemmelse foreslås det, at der ikke er rekursadgang over UVVU's afgørelser.
With this provision it is proposed that there be no right of recourse concerning DCSD's rulings.
Bestemmelsen skal ses i sammenhæng med forslagets §§ 31, stk.
The provision needs to be viewed in the context of Section 31, subs.
I den forbindelse er det uhensigtsmæssigt, hvis administrationen kan sætte sit skøn over en afgørelse truffet af en dommer.
In this connection it would be inappropriate if central government were able to voice its judgement about a ruling made by a judge.
En tilsvarende retstilstand var tilsigtet med den nuværende lov, idet der ikke i den nuværende bekendtgørelse er etableret en udtrykkelig rekursadgang over udvalgenes afgørelser.
A similar legal position was aspired to by the present law, as no express right of recourse concerning the Committees' rulings has been created in the present executive order.
Folketingets Ombudsmand fandt imidlertid i en redegørelse af 5. april 2001, at ordlyden af de nuværende regelsæt støttede en antagelse om, at UVVU's afgørelser kunne rekurreres.
The Danish Parliamentary Ombudsman, however, deemed in a report of 5 April 2001 that the wording of the present sets of rules supported an assumption that DCSD's rulings could be appealed as a matter of legal recourse.
Videnskabsministeriet har derefter lagt denne fortolkning til grund.
The Ministry of Science subsequently followed this interpretation.
På den baggrund foreslås der tilvejebragt en udtrykkelig hjemmel for, at der ikke vil være rekursadgang over sådanne afgørelser.
Against this background, it is proposed that express provision be created to ensure that there will be no right of recourse concerning such rulings.
Afgørelse af 2. december 2014 om plagiering i ph.d.-afhandling
Decision of 2 December 2014 on plagiarism in a PhD thesis
Afgørelse i pdf (engelsk)
Decision in pdf (in English)
Afgørelse af 19. november 2014 om databehandlingen m.v. i en artikel og to manuskripter
Decision of 19 November 2014 on data processing in an article and two manuscripts
UVVU fandt, at der ikke var begået videnskabelig uredelighed i denne sag.
The DCSD found the Defendant not guilty of scientific dishonesty.
UVVU fandt, at der forelå en række alvorlige brud på god videnskabelig praksis, men at Indklagede ikke kunne anses for at have handlet forsætligt eller groft uagtsomt i forbindelse hermed.
The DCSD found a series of breaches of good scientific practice, however, the Defendant was found not to have acted intentionally or with gross negligence in this regard.
Afgørelse af 16. september 2014 om 'videnskabeligt produkt'
Decision of 16 September 2014 on 'scientific product'
UVVU fandt ikke, at indstillingen kunne anses for at være et videnskabeligt produkt, hvorfor klagen ikke var omfattet af UVVU's kompetenceområde.
The DCSD found that the assessment was not a scientific product and hence the case was not within the scope of the DCSD.
Afgørelse af 28. august 2014 om genanvendelse af biopsimateriale, forsøgsprotokol, billedmanipulation, m.v. (genoptagelse af afgørelse af 18. december 2013)
Decision of 28 August 2014 on reuse of biopsy material, research protocol, image manipulation, etc. (reopening of decision of 18 December 2013)
Indklagede har indbragt sagen for domstolene, og Østre Landsret har den 18. februar 2015 afsagt dom i sagen.
The Defendant has brought the case before the Danish courts and the Eastern High Court has issued its ruling on 18 February 2015.
Landsretten finder overordnet, at det på baggrund af bevisførelsen ikke kan lægges til grund, at Indklagede havde handlet videnskabeligt uredeligt.
The High Court generally finds that based on the evidence, there is not sufficient grounds for concluding that the Defendant committed scientific dishonesty.
Indklagedes påstand om, at visse medlemmer af UVVU ikke var berrettiget til at deltage i behandlingen af sagen, afvises.
The Defendant's claim, that certain members of the DCSD was not permitted to take part in the case, is dismissed
UVVU frifindes for Indklagedes påstand om, at udvalgets afgørelser af 18. december 2013 og 28. august 2014 er ugyldige for så vidt de går ud på, at Indklagede har handlet videnskabeligt uredeligt.
The DCSD is aquitted from the Defendant's claim that the Committees decisions of 18 December 2013 and 28 August 2014 is invalid in so far as the decisions conclude that the Defendant committed scientific dishonesty
Indklagedes påstand, hvorefter udvalgets afgørelse af 28. august 2014 ophæves for så vidt den går ud på, at Indklagede har handlet videnskabeligt uredeligt, tages til følge.
The Defendant's claim, that the Committee's decision of 28 August 2014 be repealed in so far as the decision concludes that the Defendant committed scientific dishonesty, is sustained
Østre Landsret har offentliggjort et resumé af dommen på deres hjemmeside
The Eastern High Court has published a summary of the ruling on their website
På baggrund af nye oplysninger genoptog UVVU sagen.
The DCSD reopened the case based on new information.
UVVU fandt efter genoptagelsen, at der i 4 af de 12 indklagede artikler var begået videnskabelig uredelighed af den indklagede forsker i form af
In the reopened case, the DCSD found the Defendant guilty of scientific dishonesty in 4 of the 12 articles covered by the complaint in the form of:
Manglende oplysninger om biopsimateriale i 2 artikler, hvilket medførte, at resultaternes indbyrdes sammenhæng blev holdt skjult for læseren
Lack of information about biopsy material in 2 articles entailing that the interrelationship between results was concealed from the reader
Manglende oplysninger om biopsimateriale i 2 artikler, hvilket medførte, at en selektion af forsøgspersoner blev holdt skjult for læseren
Lack of information about biopsy material in 2 articles entailing that a selection of test subjects was concealed from the reader
Manglende oplysninger om biopsimateriale og dermed om, at en gruppe forsøgspersoner havde udført en anden forsøgsprotokol end beskrevet i artiklen
Lack of information about biopsy material entailing concealment of the fact that a group of test subjects was subject to a different research protocol than the one described in the article
Manglende reaktion på tydelig billedmanipulation i en artikel
Failure to respond to obvious image manipulation in an article
UVVU fandt, at Indklagede havde handlet forsætligt i relation til de manglende oplysninger om biopsimaterialet i 3 artikler.
DCSD found that the Defendant had acted intentionally in relation to the lack of information about biopsy material in 3 articles.
UVVU fandt endvidere, at Indklagede havde handlet groft uagtsomt i relation til de manglende oplysninger om biopsimaterialet og dermed forsøgsprotokollen for en gruppe forsøgspersoner.
In addition DCSD found that the Defendant had acted grossly negligently in relation to the lack of information about biopsy material and therefore the fact that a group of test subjects was subject to a different research protocol than the one described in the article.
Herudover fandt UVVU, at Indklagede havde et medansvar for billedmanipulationen, da Indklagedes manglende reaktion herpå som ledende forfatter af artiklen var udtryk for grov uagtsomhed.
Furthermore DCSD found the Defendant joint responsible for the image manipulation as the Defendant had acted gross negligently as leading author of the article by failing to respond to the image manipulation.
Afgørelse af 28. august 2014 om samtykke til indsendelse af erratum
Decision of 28 August 2014 on consent to submission of an erratum
Afgørelse af 27. august 2014 om genanvendelse af biopsimateriale i flere videnskabelige arbejder
Decision of 27 August 2014 on reuse of biopsy material in different scientific products
UVVU afviste klagen fra yderligere behandling, idet klagen ansås for åbenbart grundløs.
The DCSD declined to take the case under further consideration as the complaint was manifestly unfounded.
UVVU fandt således, at den indklagede artikel indeholdt tilstrækkelige oplysninger om biopsimaterialets anvendelse.
The DCSD found that the article in question contained sufficient information about the origin of the biopsy material.
Afgørelse af 6. maj 2014 om 'videnskabeligt produkt'
Decision of 6 May 2014 on 'scientific product'
Formanden for UVVU afviste at behandle sagen, da klagen angik en kronik i et dagblad, der ikke kunne anses for at være et videnskabeligt produkt.
The chairman of the DCSD declined to take the case under consideration as the complaint was aimed at a feature in a newspaper.
Klagen var således ikke omfattet af UVVU's kompetenceområde.
Thus the complaint did not concern a scientific product and was not within the scope of the DCSD.
Gennem sit bilaterale samarbejde med Kina har Det Strategiske Forskningsråd i år besluttet at støtte to projekter af central betydning for fremtidens grønne el-systemer med i alt 10 millioner kr.
Through its bilateral cooperation with China, The Danish Council for Strategic Research has decided to grant two projects of central importance to the green electricity systems of the future with a total of DKK 10 million.
Det er også en virkelighed, hvor vi bevæger os væk fra central forvaltning med store kraftværker til lokale afgrænsede systemer med vedvarende energikilder.
It is also a reality where we are moving away from central management with big power plants to local, defined systems with renewable energy sources.
”Jeg er meget tilfreds med, at vi igen i år har høj kvalitet af ansøgninger i vores femte dansk-kinesiske opslag,” udtaler formanden for Det Strategiske Forskningsråds programkomite professor Poul Erik Morthorst fra Danmarks Tekniske Universitet.
“I am very pleased with the fact that we again this year have received applications of high quality, this being our fifth Danish-Chinese call,” says the Chairman of the Danish Council for Strategic Research's Programme Commission on Sustainable Energy and Environment, Professor Poul Erik Morthorst from the Technical University of Denmark.
”Vi har desværre kun midler til to projekter, men det viser, at samarbejdet mellem Danmark og Kina inden for energi er veludviklet.
“Unfortunately, we can only award grants to two proposals, but it indicates that the cooperation between Denmark and China in the area of energy research is well-developed.
Der er mange forbindelser mellem danske og kinesiske forskere og virksomheder inden for energi, som der kan bygges videre på.
There are many connections between Danish and Chinese researchers and companies, which they can continue to build on.
Det er også et tegn på, at den danske energiforskning fortsat har en global horisont, og at dansk viden er respekteret og efterspurgt ude i verden”.
It is also an indication of that Danish energy research continues to have a global horizon, and that Danish knowledge is respected and in demand, worldwide.”
Danmark og Kina har en fælles strategisk interesse i at imødegå udfordringer inden for bæredygtig energi og kan lære meget af, hvordan man forvalter el-systemer og hvordan projekter praktisk udfoldes i hvert af de to lande.
Denmark and China has a joint strategic interest in meeting the challenges within sustainable energy, and can learn a lot about how to manage electricity systems and how projects unfold in practice in the two countries.
Det er det femte bilaterale opslag mellem Danmark og Kina.
It is the fifth bilateral call between Denmark and China.
Partnere: Institute of Flexible Electric Power Technology, North China Electric Power University (NCEPU), Smart Grid Research Institute of the State Grid Corporation of China (SGRI), Electric Power Distribution Department of China Electric, Power Research Institute (CEPRI), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS).
Partners: Institute of Flexible Electric Power Technology, North China Electric Power University (NCEPU), Smart Grid Research Institute of the State Grid Corporation of China (SGRI), Electric Power Distribution Department of China Electric, Power Research Institute (CEPRI), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS).
Forskningsprojektet vil fokusere på udviklingen af fremtidens intelligente DC microgrids, og forskerne ønsker at undersøge de forskellige aspekter af DC microgrids: Design, modellering, kontrol, koordinering, kommunikation og forvaltning.
The research project will focus on the development of future intelligent DC microgrids, and the researchers aims to explore the different aspects of DC microgrids: Design, modeling, control, coordination, communications and management.
Josep M. Guerrero samarbejder med flere kinesiske partnere om dette projekt.
Josep M. Guerrero is working with a number of Chinese partners on this research project.
I Danmark sigter forsøget således mod at skabe et effektivt system i private boliger, mens de i Kina sigter på at udvikle et system til industrien
In Denmark the research will be carried out in DC microgrid living labs focused on commercial buildings and residential applications, while the aim of the Chinese partner is to develop DC microgrid systems for industrial applications.
Bevillingsmodtager: Henrik William Bindner, Institut for Elektroteknologi, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Grant holder: Henrik William Bindner, Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Opbygning og udbygning af eksisterende forskning
Countries coordinate action on research
Det Strategiske Forskningsråd deltager i forskningsprogrammet ”Joint Programming Initiative for Neurodegenerative Diseases” (JPND).
The Danish Council for Strategic Research is part of 'EU Joint Programme - Neurodegenerative Diseases Research' (JPND).
Forskningen skal bidrage til at løse de væsentlige samfundsmæssige udfordringer, der er forbundet med disse sygdomme.
Some research challenges are so big that one country cannot solve them on its own.
I øjeblikket deltager 27 lande i JPND.
Currently 27 countries participate in JPND.
I det seneste opslag er det besluttet i alt at give bevilling til fem projekter.
In the latest call a total number of five projects will be supported.
Resultaterne vil potentielt kunne benyttes til bedre at forudsige udvikling af sygdommene samt til at udvikle nye forebyggende strategier.
The results will be used to predict disease development and to develop prevention strategies.
Professor Albin Sandelin
Associate Professor Albin Sandelin
De to bevillinger vil blive publiceret på fivu.dk i midten af september.
The two grants will be published on fivu.dk in the middle of September.
Herfra kan de enten gå direkte på arbejdsmarkedet og specialisere sig inden for en branche eller tage en overbygning med fokus på forretning eller endnu større teknisk specialisering.”
The procedures used to model a given domain by assigning a structured set of data to it are discussed and analysed from the point of view of both ontology and epistemology.
Derfor har vi målrettet uddannelsen til studerende med interesse for matematik, analyse og anvendelser.
The student groups can focus on different types of big data systems.
De studerende bliver trænet i at anvende disse kompetencer i realistiske situationer; herunder at interagere med eksperter i et givet anvendelsesområde for at formulere relevante målsætninger for de data-drevne beslutninger.
Furthermore, an ability to understand and exploit the technical possibilities and limitations of big data tools is required to ground solution generation in the realm of the possible.
Specielt får de kommunikationskompetencer, der gør det muligt for dem at hjælpe beslutningstagere uden teknisk baggrund med at operationalisere den viden, der ligger i data.
This creative studio style course focuses on designing and evaluating innovative big data applications for either commercial and/or societal benefits.
De fleste, der i dag arbejder som data scientist, har uddannelse i et beslægtet teknisk, samfundsfagligt eller naturvidenskabeligt område, hvor databearbejdning og analyse indgår.
Methods for collaboratively generating and communicating innovative concepts are explained, alongside an introduction to provocative approaches for sparking imagination and discussion such as Design Fiction and Speculative Design.
Kombinationerne gør det muligt at bidrage til at lukke flere “huller” i det danske udbud af universitetsgrader, som diskuteret ovenfor og i afsnit Kort redegørelse for behovet for den nye uddannelse, f.eks.:
The course deals with the architectural features and constraints, which an IT-system designed for the handling of big data has to obey in order to be efficient and useful.
Uddannelsens konstituerende faglige elementer
Moreover, the students acquire knowledge about decision processes.