natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- Men stigningen er dog beskeden, og der er brug for endnu flere unge danskere med international erfaring, forståelse og udsyn.
- But the increase is a modest one, and we need even more young Danes with international experience, understanding and outlook.
Derfor lancerer vi i næste måned kampagnen "Grib Verden" , som skal motivere og inspirere flere danske studerende til et studie- eller praktikophold i udlandet.
So next month we will launch the campaign "Grib Verden" ("Seize the World"), which is intended to motivate and inspire more Danish students to go on a study visit or internship abroad.
- Jeg mener, at de studerende - på universitetsuddannelser, hvor det er relevant - som udgangspunkt skal tilbringe et semester af deres studietid i udlandet.
- I believe that students - at the university programmes where this is relevant - should basically spend one term of their studying time abroad.
Det synes ifølge unge, der allerede har været af sted, at øge deres globale og kulturelle forståelse; ligesom det øger den faglige indsigt og befordrer den personlige udvikling.
Young people who have already been abroad report that this seems to increase their global and cultural understanding, and also gives a boost to their professional insight and personal development.
Egenskaber, arbejdsmarkedet efterspørger.
Qualities in demand by the job market.
Derudover skal vi ubetinget mindske de administrative barrierer for de unge, der vil studere i udlandet, så flere kommer af sted, siger videnskabsministeren.
In addition, we definitely need to reduce the administrative barriers to young people who wish to study abroad so that a larger number will be going, says the Science Minister.
Videnskabsminister Charlotte Sahl-Madsen kan kontaktes gennem informationschef Allan Boldt, tlf.
Further information about the mobility statistics can be obtained from the Danish Agency for International Education, Ken Thomassen, Chief Consultant, tel.
En ny international evaluering af det danske forsknings- og innovationssystem viser nu, at det danske system fungerer godt, men der er også flere ting, som kan forbedres.
A new international evaluation of the Danish research and innovation system shows that it is a well-functioning system, but there are a number of things that could be improved.
Overordnet set er der et solidt fundament at bygge videre på.
Overall, it is seen as a solid foundation for further development.
Regeringen har bedt om evalueringen som led i arbejdet med innovationsstrategien.
The Government had asked for an evaluation as part of its work with the innovation strategy.
Den er gennemført af European Research Area Committee, ERAC og indeholder 22 anbefalinger til et endnu bedre forsknings- og innovationssystem.
It has been carried out by the European Research Area Committee (ERAC) and contains 22 recommendations for an even better research and innovation system.
Regeringen forventer at være klar med sit bud på en innovationsstrategi inden årets udgang.
The Government is expected to deliver its vision for an innovation strategy by the end of the year.
Strategien er et væsentligt led i regeringens arbejde med at skabe vækst og arbejdspladser.
The strategy is a significant part of the Government's plan to create growth and more employment.
Uddannelsesminister Morten Østergaard fastslår, at innovation i højere grad skal bidrage til vækst og beskæftigelse.
Higher Education Minister Morten Østergaard has made clear that innovation must contribute even more to growth and jobs.
Derfor er der behov for at gennemgå den samlede danske innovationsindsats.
There is therefore a need to examine the collective Danish innovation effort.
- Jeg er glad for ERACs anbefalinger, som vil indgå i det videre arbejde med innovationsstrategien.
- I am pleased with the ERAC's recommendations, which will be considered in the future work of the innovation strategy.
ERAC anbefaler en forenkling af den nuværende komplekse struktur for råd, fonde med videre, der støtter innovation.
I agree with the recommendation to simplify the current complex structure of councils, foundations, etc. that support innovation.
Vi skal tænke i løsninger frem for kasser.
We must think of solutions rather than boxes.
- En del af Danmarks vækst skal komme fra de reformer, vi gennemfører af arbejdsmarkedet, hvor flere arbejder mere, og flere kommer ind på arbejdsmarkedet.
- Part of Denmark's growth will come from reforms we have made of the labour market, which see more people working more, and more people joining the labour market.
En anden del af væksten skal komme fra flere og bedre uddannede, opkvalificering af arbejdsstyrken og styrkelse og bedre udnyttelse af det innovationspotentiale, som danske virksomheder har, siger Morten Østergaard.
Another part of the growth will result from educating more people and better educating them, up-skilling the workforce and strengthening and making better use of the innovation potential of Danish companies, says Morten Østergaard.
En række af anbefalingerne trækker i samme retning som uddannelsesministerens egne tanker om, hvad der skal til for at styrke innovationen i Danmark.
A number of the recommendations match the minister's views on how to improve innovation in Denmark.
- Innovationen skal i langt højere grad drives strategisk af løsningen af de store samfundsmæssige udfordringer.
- Innovation must be driven strategically to a greater extent by solving great societal challenges.
Vi skal ikke længere blot bevilge penge til en række enkeltstående projekter.
No longer should we just allocate money to many individual projects.
Det skal naturligvis ske på områder, hvor danske virksomheder har stærke kompetencer både indenfor udvikling og produktion.
This must of course take place within areas where Danish companies have strong competences in development and production.
- Innovation skal også ud på uddannelsesstederne og integreres tæt i den daglige undervisning.
- Innovation should also be a feature of educational institutions and be closely integrated in daily teaching.
De skal ikke kun være parate til at varetage et job, men også i stand til at skabe job, og det skal uddannelsesstederne understøtte, siger Morten Østergaard.
They should not only be ready to work at a job, but also be able to create jobs and this must be supported by the institutions, says Morten Østergaard.
Den internationale evaluering af det danske forsknings- og innovationssystem er et såkaldt ERAC peer review.
The international evaluation of the Danish research and innovation system is an ERAC peer review.
ERAC er et rådgivende organ for Europa Kommissionen.
ERAC is an advisory body for the European Commission.
Evalueringen er foretaget af et internationalt ekspertpanel, herunder to eksterne konsulenter og fire højtplacerede embedsmænd, som er udpeget af kolleger EU-lande.
The evaluation has been carried out by an international expert panel including two external consultants and four senior policy makers appointed by fellow EU member states.
Repræsentanterne kommer fra Østrig, Finland, Tyskland, Nederlandene og UK.
There were representatives from Austria, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
Hovedskribent på rapporten er professor Paul Cunningham, Senior Research Fellow and Director, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, University of Manchester.
The lead consultant of the report is Professor Paul Cunningham, Senior Research Fellow and Director, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, University of Manchester.
Rapporten præsenteres under konferencen International Evaluation of the Danish Research and Innovation System.
The report will be presented during the International Evaluation of the Danish Research and Innovation System conference.
Konferencen afholdes i Eigtveds Pakhus, Asiatisk Plads 18, 1402 København K. den 27. september klokken 13.30.
The conference takes place at Eigtveds Pakhus, Asiatisk Plads 18, 1402 Copenhagen K. on 27 September, 13:30.
Pressen er velkommen.
Media are welcome.
Dansk titel: Patient@home - Innovativ velfærdsteknologi til det 21. århundrede
Title: Patient@home - Innovative Welfare technology for the 21st Century
Bevillingsmodtager: Syddansk Universitet
Grant holder: University of Southern Denmark
Kontaktperson: Uffe Kock Wiil, Mobil: 60 11 35 65
Contact: Uffe Kock Wiil, cell: 60 11 35 65
Samlet budget: 190 mio kr.
Total budget: DKK 190 million
Forskeruddannelse: 17 PhD'ere og 5 postdocs
Research training: 17 PhDs and 5 postdocs
Eksterne fonde: Syddansk Vækstforum.
External foundations: The Growth Forum of Southern Denmark.
Projektet vil dermed understøtte den nødvendige udvikling i sundhedssektoren i retning af flere ambulante behandlinger og udlæggelser til eget hjem opfulgt af hjemmemonitoreret behandling, pleje og/eller rehabilitering.
Process and results will be driven by a close collaboration between health care staff and patients, private enterprises and research institutions.
Offentlig Privat Innovation skal sikre relevans og afgørende effekt af nye velfærdsteknologiske produkter og ydelser til kvalificering af de nye sygehusbyggerier.
Public-private innovation (PPI) will ensure relevance and impact of new welfare technology products and services that can help qualify decisions made in relation to the new hospital projects in Denmark.
Proces og resultater drives frem i et tæt samarbejde mellem personale og patienter, private virksomheder og forskningsinstitutioner.
Processes are driven and results are generated in close collaboration between health care professionals, patients, private companies, and research institutions.
Det tværgående samarbejde skal sikre brugeraccept blandt fagfolk i sundhedssektoren såvel som hos patienterne.
This cross-fertilization aims to ensure user acceptance by health care professionals as well as patients.
Teknologiske indsatser i Patient@home vil muliggøre en øget brug af hjemmemonitorering, forbedret rehabilitering og pleje og vil være understøttet af ny forskning i klinisk evidens.
The technological development in Patient@home will increase home monitoring, improve rehabilitation, and so increase the safety and incidence of care at home.
at sundhedssektoren kan øge behandlingskvaliteten og samtidig sikre en optimering af ressourcer;
Through coordination of parallel and interdisciplinary research and innovation activities, Patient@home will:
at patienter kan være engagerede ift. egen behandling og rehabilitering;
enable optimization of Danish health care procedures to achieve better treatment at decreased expense;
at private danske virksomheder får adgang til ny viden og procesværktøjer, der kan danne grundlaget for en stærk international markedsposition; og
enable increased patient participation and responsibility (where possible) for their own healing process resulting in an increased quality of life;
at de involverede forskningsinstitutioner bliver styrket ved ny tværfaglig forskning, får adgang til testfaciliteter samt direkte samarbejde med virksomheder og sundhedssektor.
provide Danish industry and partners with access to state-of-the-art knowledge, laboratories, and real-life test facilities, enabling them to build strong international market positions based on innovative and intelligent welfare products and services;
Vil du vide mere?
Want to know more?
Hvad ligger under overfladen?
What lies beneath the surface?
Dette er sammenfatningen af en gennemgang af forsknings- og policyrettet litteratur om samarbejde mellem offentlige forskningsinstitutioner og private virksomheder.
This is the executive summary of a review of academic and policy-oriented literature on collaboration between public research institutions and private firms.
Målet med litteraturstudiet var at identificere og formidle nyeste viden om kanaler, motivation og barrierer for samarbejde mellem den offentlige forskning og erhvervslivet.
The aim of the review was to identify and communicate “state-of-the-art” knowledge about mechanisms, motivations, and barriers for collaboration between public science and industry.
Litteraturstudiet bygger på en bred søgning på forsknings- og policyrettet litteratur, primært fra de seneste ti år, og suppleret med relevante tidligere bidrag, særligt fra forskningslitteraturen.
The review builds on a wide search for academic and policy literature, primarily from the past ten years, but supplemented with relevant earlier texts, particularly from the academic literature.
Selv om de temaer og problemstillinger, som litteraturstudiet handler om, kan genfindes i hele verdenen, så er den primære målgruppe for studiet medlemmerne af DFiR samt politiske beslutningstagere og andre relevante interessenter i Danmark.
Although the themes and issues covered in the review are global, the primary target group of the review are the members of the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy and policymakers and other relevant stakeholders in Denmark.
Eksempelvis er nogle sektioner i studiet helliget til en præsentation af nylige danske analyser.
For example, certain sections are dedicated to a presentation of recent findings from Denmark.
Vi er også opmærksomme på, at offentlige forskningsinstitutioner omfatter forskellige typer af institutioner; dette litteraturstudie fokuserer primært på universiteter, dels fordi de dominerer den offentlige forskningssektor i Danmark, dels fordi de har været genstand for flest forskningsprojekter og analyse.
We also recognize that public research organizations include a variety of institutions; however, the review focuses primarily on universities, which dominate the public research sector in Denmark, and which are most heavily studied in the literature.
Universiteter forventes i stigende omfang ikke blot at levere forskning og højtuddannede dimittender, men også at yde et mere direkte bidrag til økonomisk vækst, pri
Universities are increasingly expected not just to undertake and disseminate fundamental research and churn out highly skilled graduates, but also to contribute more directly to economic growth, notably
mært gennem samarbejde med erhvervslivet og en aktiv indsats for at fremme kommercialiseringen af forskning.
through direct collaboration with industry and active efforts to commercialize academic research results.
Det positive afkast af investeringer i offentlig forskning er veldokumenteret og konservativt estimeret til mellem 20 og 40 procent.
The positive impact of public investments in university research is well-documented, with conservative estimates of the return on such investments ranging from 20 to 40 percent.
Gevinsten for virksomheder, som indgår i samarbejde med universiteter, er også veldokumenteret, i form af både øget innovation og økonomisk performance.
The payoff for firms who engage directly in collaboration with universities is similarly well-documented, both in the form of increased innovation and improved financial performance.
i de seneste årtier vokset i både volumen og typer af samarbejdskanaler.
new phenomenon, but has in recent decades increased in both volume and the variety of types of collaboration.
Der er desuden væsentlige indbyrdes afhængigheder mellem typer af samarbejdskanaler, hvorfor det fx ikke giver mening at forsøge at øge fx antallet af patenter uden samtidig at stimulere kanaler for formelt eller uformelt samarbejde, samt de bagvedliggende personlige netværk.
There are also significant interdependencies between mechanisms, implying that it does not make sense to simply push for e.g. more university patents: boosting university-industry interaction requires stimulating several mechanisms and the underlying personal ties.
Indtægter kan desuden tilskrives ganske få, men exceptionelt lukrative patenter.
This money can moreover be traced to a very small number of exceptionally lucrative patents; most patents make no money.
Selv de universiteter, som tjener mest, kæmper for at tjene et overskud: blandt de 20 amerikanske universiteter, som tjener mest i licensindtægter, formår kun fem at høste et overskud.
Even the universities that receive the most licensing income struggle to make a profit: among the 20 top-earning universities in the US, only five make a profit.
Spinouts er ikke altid en effektiv kanal for kommercialisering af forskning.
Spinouts are not always an effective means of commercializing research.
Forskere har dog argumenteret, at profit og vækst ikke nødvendigvis er de eneste succeskriterier for universitetsspinouts: på grund af deres forskningsbaserede natur kan selv tabsgivende virksomheder stadig yde et betydeligt bidrag ved at oversætte banebrydende forskning og stille den til rådighed for andre virksomheder.
However, it's been argued that profit and growth may not be the only success parameters for university spinouts: by virtue of their research-based nature, even lossmaking firms may still make a significant contribution by translating cutting-edge research and making it available to other firms.
Kvantitative indikatorer har forstærket det enfoldige fokus på forskningsresultater,
Quantitative indicators have reinforced the single-minded emphasis on easily mea
Kvantitative indikatorer for videnudveksling kan give universiteter uhensigtsmæssige incitamenter til at levere målbare resultater (fx patenter), og reelt straffe mere værdiskabende tiltag for at fremme den erhvervsmæssige nyttiggørelse af forskning (fx gennem uformelt samarbejde eller konsulentydelser).
Quantitative indicators for knowledge exchange can give universities undesirable incentives to deliver measurable outputs (e.g. patents), while potentially penalizing productive efforts to bring academic research to commercial use (e.g. through informal collaboration or consulting).
Brugen af kvantitative indikatorer bør derfor kvalificeres gennem kvalitativ indsigt i videnudveksling.
Use of quantitative indicators should thus be informed by qualitative insight.
Erhvervsorientering og god forskning går
Industry orientation and good science go
hånd i hånd: forskere, som indgår i samarbejde med den private sektor, er tilbøjelige til også at udvise stærk videnskabelig performance, målt på antallet og gennemslagskraften af deres videnskabelige publikationer.
hand in hand: researchers who engage with the private sector are likely to show strong scientific performance in terms of high productivity and scientific impact.
Forholdet mellem erhvervsorientering og videnskabelig performance er dog kurvelineært; det indikerer, at forskere kan arbejde for tæt sammen med erhvervslivet.
However, the relationship between industry orientation and scientific performance is curvilinear, suggesting that it is possible for researchers to work too closely with industry.
Forsinkelser og begrænsninger på adgang til offentlige forskningsresultater som følge af samarbejde med erhvervslivet lader ikke til at udgøre et betydeligt eller
Delays and restrictions on access to public research as a result of collaboration with industry do not appear to be a widespread or large-scale problem.
Dog peger litteraturen på tilfælde, hvor adgang forsinkes eller begrænses.
there do appear to be instances where delays or restrictions occur.
Der er brug for mere viden om, hvornår og hvorfor dette sker, samt om problemets omfang og konsekvenser.
More study is needed to determine when and why they occur, as well as their severity and wider consequences.
Bedre indsigt i forskeres prioriteringer er væsentlig for at opnå øget universitets-er
Better understanding of individual researchers' attitudes is key to increasing university-industry collaboration, because
Dette kalder på større opmærksomhed på individuelle forskeres opfattelser af barrierer og incitamenter for samarbejde.
ought therefore to be paid to obstacles and incentives as perceived by the individual researcher.
ningsmidler, ideer til nye forskningsprojekter eller adgang til materialer og udstyr.
teaching, e.g. research funding, ideas for new research paths, or access to materials or equipment.
En vigtig nøgle til at motivere flere forskere til at indgå i samarbejde med erhvervslivet er derfor at hjælpe dem med at realisere fordele for deres forskning og undervisning.
An important means to motivate more researchers to engage in collaboration is therefore to help them realize benefits for their research and teaching activities.
Væsentlige barrierer for samarbejde med erhvervslivet er manglende prioritering/anerkendelse fra ledelsen samt forskellige tidshorisonter og målsætninger i forskningsverdenen og erhvervslivet; disse barrierer bør derfor adresseres, hvad enten de er reelle eller oplevede.
Key barriers to collaboration with industry are lack of prioritization/reward from university management, and conflicting timeframes and goals in academia and industry; these barriers, whether real or perceived, should be addressed.
FoU-samarbejde kan ende i skuffede for
R&D collaborations often fail or fall short
Universiteter forventes ofte at yde et væsentligt bidrag til vækst i regionale/lokale innovationssystemer, selv om der er relativt lidt dokumentation for, at universiteter er effektive i at etablere sådanne systemer.
Universities are often expected to play a leading role in driving growth in regional/ local innovation systems, even though there is little evidence to support that universities are effective in creating such
forskning er blot én af mange kilder til innovation i erhvervslivet, og en som meget få virksomheder trækker direkte på.
Public science is but one of many inputs to private innovation, and one that very few firms tap into.
Derudover er private investeringer i FoU stagneret siden 2010.
In addition, private investments in R&D in Denmark have stagnated since 2010.
Hvorfor viser analyser af effekterne af offentlige FoU-ordninger ikke bedre resultater?
Why aren't studies of public grants for collaborative R&D finding better results?
En del af forklaringen kan ligge i den høje grad af variation inden for de aktiviteter, som disse ordninger støtter; projekter er ikke lige succesfulde, og mange projekter er ganske enkelt ikke så godt tilrettelagt eller styret, som de kunne være.
Part of the explanation might lie in the substantial variation in the performance of projects supported by such grants; many projects simply aren't as well designed or managed as they could or should be.
Forskning viser desuden, at subsidier til ”forskning” har større sandsynlighed for at stimulere private FoU-investeringer, mens subsidier til ”udvikling” ser ud til at substituere privat investering, hvilket tyder på, at offentlig støtte bør fokuseres til forsknings- snarere end udviklingsprojekter.
Moreover, research shows that “research” subsidies are likely to stimulate R&D spending by firms, while “development” subsidies appear to substitute such spending, suggesting that public programs should focus on research rather than development projects in order to stimulate more R&D.
Litteraturen peger på et behov for at vurdere, om der i dag findes tilstrækkelige midler til at bringe lovende, universitetsopfindelser sikkert over ”Dødens Gab”, dvs. til et punkt, hvor de er attraktive for private investorer.
Studies suggest the need to assess whether there is at present sufficient funding available to bring promising, early-stage university inventions across the “Valley of Death” to a point where they become attractive to private investors.
Virker offentlige ordninger for FoU-samarbejde mellem virksomheder og universite
Informal meetings, advice and exchanges Mobility of staff
Forskning viser desuden, at subsidier til ”forskning” har større sandsynlighed for at stimulere private FoU-investeringer, mens subsidier til ”udvikling” ser ud til at substituere privat investering, hvilket tyder på, at offentlig støtte bør fokuseres til forsknings- snarere end udviklingsprojekter.
Part of the explanation might lie in the substantial variation in the performance of projects supported by such grants; many projects simply aren't as well designed or managed as they could or should be.
Sammenhængen mellem fødevarer, sundhed og livsstil
Connection between food, health and lifestyle
Bioressourcer, fødevarer og andre biologiske produkter, herunder produktionssystemer og processer i fødevareerhvervet
Bioresources, food and other biological products, including production systems and processes within the food industry
Læs om programkomiteens forskningsprogrammer
Read about the programme commission's research programmes