natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Høringsprocessen af Open Access udvalgets anbefalinger tilkendegav en bred opbakning til princippet om fri adgang til offentligt finansieret forskning.
The consultation process about the Open Access Committee’s recommendations indicated wide support for the principle of open access to publicly funded research.
Dette betyder, at forskningsartikler efter en peer review-proces i det eksisterende tidsskriftssystem parallelpubliceres i et institutionelt eller emnespecifikt repositorium, hvortil der vil være fri adgang.
This means that research articles, after a peer review process in the existing journal system, will be published in parallel in an institutional or subject- specific repository, to which there will be open access.
Denne parallelpubli- cering kan eventuelt udmøntes med en begrænset karenstid, hvor artiklerne udelukkende vil være tilgængelige i tidsskrifterne.
This parallel publishing could be put into practice with a limited deferred period, during which the articles would solely be accessible in the journals.
Samtidig har Open Access Udvalget i anbefalingerne peget på, at der skal etableres bæredygtige modeller for fortsat forsknings- publicering på dansk.
In its recommendations, the Open Access Committee has pointed out that new sustainable models for continued research publication in Danish must be established.
Udvalget har modtaget oplysninger fra Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsens bibliometriske forskningsindikator med henblik på at belyse mulighederne for at give grøn Open Access til danskproducerede tidsskrifter.
The Committee has received information from the Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation's biometric research indicator with a view to clarifying the possibilities of giving green Open Access to Danish articles.
Statistikken viser, at 42% af de videnskabelige artikler, som har opnået point i indikatoren i 2010, kan gøres frit tilgængelige via grøn Open Access.
Statistics show that 42 % of the scientific articles that have achieved points in the indicator in 2010 can be made freely available via green Open Access.
Anbefaling 1.
Recommendation 1.
Videnskabsministeriet etablerer national Open Access-politik
The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation establishes an Open Access policy
Anbefaling 2.
Recommendation 2.
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at alle forskningsråd og offentlige fonde implementerer Open Access-politikker, der lever op til den nationale Open Access-politik.
The Open Access Committee recommends that all research councils and public foundations implement Open Access policies that comply with the national Open Access policy.
Anbefaling 3.
Recommendation 3.
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at alle universiteter og forskningsinstitutioner løbende arbejder med at implementere og fremme Open Access-politikker, der lever op til den nationale Open Access- politik.
The Open Access Committee recommends that all universities and research institutions continually work to implement and promote Open Access policies that comply with the national Open Access policy.
Anbefaling 4.
Recommendation 4.
Undersøgelse gennemføres af mulighederne for koordinering mellem den bibliometriske forskningsindikator og Open Access-politikkerne
Survey of the possibilities of coordination between the bibliometric research indicator and the Open Access policies
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at det i regi af Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen (FI) og Danmarks Elektroniske Fag- og Forskningsbibliotek (DEFF) undersøges, om der eventuelt kan opnås samspil mellem den bibliometriske forskningsindikator og Open Access.
The Open Access Committee recommends that a study be carried out under the auspices of the Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation and Denmark's Electronic Research Library (DEFF), which is to find out whether it would be possible to achieve interplay between the bibliometric research indicator and Open Access.
Anbefaling 5.
Recommendation 5.
Én samlet national forskningsdatabase
One common national research database
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i offentlige forskningsbevillinger henstilles, at al dansk offentligt finansieret forskning bliver tilgængelig i forskningsinstitutionernes forskningsdatabaser og/eller via en samlet forskningsportal baseret på Den Danske Forskningsdatabase i samarbejde med FI og DEFF, som kan formidle de samlede forskningsresultater med klar angivelse/kreditering af det udførende universitet/forskningsinstitution.
The Open Access Committee recommends that public research grants should recommend that all Danish publicly funded research be made available in the research institutions' research databases and/or via a common research portal based on the Danish National Research Database in collaboration with the Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation and DEFF, which can disseminate the collective research results with clear indication/crediting of the performing university/ research institution.
Anbefaling 6.
Recommendation 6.
Anbefaling 7.
Recommendation 7.
Danske videnskabelige forlag, videnskabelige selskaber og videnskabsredak- tører udarbejder oplæg om omstilling til Open Access for videnskabelige tidsskrifter
Danish scientific publishers, scientific associations and science editors prepare discussion paper on scientific journals' transition to Open Access
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at danske videnskabelige forlag, danske videnskabelige foreninger og videnskabsredaktører opfordres til at udarbejde forslag til, hvordan danske tidsskrifter kan omstilles til Open Access.
The Open Access Committee recommends that Danish scientific publishers, Danish scientific associations and science editors be encouraged to prepare proposals on how Danish journals can make the transition to Open Access.
Anbefaling 8.
Recommendation 8.
Danske videnskabelige forlag og videnskabelige selskaber udarbejder oplæg om omstilling til Open Access for videnskabelige monografier
Danish scientific publishers and scientific associations prepare discussion paper on scientific monographs' transition to Open Access
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at danske videnskabelige forlag og danske videnskabelige foreninger opfordres til at udarbejde forslag til, hvordan danske monografier kan omstilles til Open Access.
The Open Access Committee recommends that Danish scientific publishers and Danish scientific associations be encouraged to prepare proposals on how Danish monographs can make the transition to Open Access.
Anbefaling 9.
Recommendation 9.
Open Access Udvalget overvåger implementeringen af videnskabsministerens Open Access-strategi
The Open Access Committee monitors the implementation of the Minister of Science's Open Access strategy
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at udvalget sekretariatsbetjenes af DEFF og overvåger og koordinerer implementeringen af videnskabsministerens Open Access-strategi i en projektperiode på fire år.
The Open Access Committee recommends that the Committee be given secretariat assistance from DEFF, and that it monitor and coordinate the implementation of the Minister of Science's Open Access strategy for a project period of four years.
Anbefaling 10.
Recommendation 10.
Styrke og understøtte information, debat og dialog
Strengthen and support information, debate and dialogue
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i forbindelse med koordinering af implementeringen af Open Access Udvalgets anbefalinger gennemføres en informationskampagne omkring Open Access målrettet forskermiljøer i form af f.eks. informationsmateriale og konferencer.
The Open Access Committee recommends that in connection with the coordination of the implementation of the Open Access Committee's recommendations an information campaign be carried out about Open Access, targeted at research environments in the form of e.g. information material and conferences.
Anbefaling 11.
Recommendation 11.
Anbefaling 12. DEFF øger fokus på Open Access i DEFF konsortielicenser
Recommendation 12.
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i DEFFs licensarbejde og i de internationale samarbejder, hvori DEFF indgår, sættes fokus på forhandling af forfatterafgifter i forbindelse med gylden Open Access, frihed til grøn Open Access og transparente forretningsmodeller for Open Access-publicering mod betaling.
DEFF increases focus on Open Access in DEFF consortium licenses The Open Access Committee recommends that in DEFF's work with licences and in the international partnerships in which DEFF takes part, focus be directed at negotiation of authors' royalties in connection with golden Open Access, freedom to green Open Access, and transparent business models for Open Access publishing at a fee.
Anbefaling 13.
Recommendation 13.
Anbefaling 14.
Recommendation 14.
Anbefaling 15.
Recommendation 15.
Anbefaling 16.
Recommendation 16.
Samtidig tillader mange internationale tidsskrifter allerede den form for parallelpublicering af peer reviewed artikler, som grøn Open Access repræsenterer.
Furthermore, many international journals already permit the form of parallel publishing of peer-reviewed articles that green Open Access represents.
Regeringen har ved videnskabsministeren tiltrådt Ministerrådets konklusioner om videnskabelig information i den digitale tidsalder.
The Government, represented by the Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, has approved the Council of the European Union's conclusions about scientific information in the digital age.The conclusions deal with:
At styrke de nationale strategier og strukturer for adgang til og formidling af videnskabelig information
Reinforcing national strategies and structures for access to and dissemination of scientific information.
At styrke koordinationen mellem medlemsstaterne af politikker og praksis med hensyn til adgang og formidling
Reinforcing coordination between the member states of policies and practice regarding access and dissemination.
At sikre langtidsbevaring af videnskabelig information, herunder publikationer og data samt vise den videnskabelige information i nationale bevaringsstrategier behørig opmærksomhed.
Ensuring long-term preservation of scientific information, including publications and data, and showing due attention to scientific information in national preservation strategies.
Danmark har dermed forpligtet sig til at sikre, at Ministerrådets konklusioner implementeres i Danmark.
Thereby, Denmark has committed to ensuring that the Council of the European Union's conclusions are implemented in Denmark.
Med det formål at leve op til konklusionerne har Ministeriet for Videnskab, Teknologi og Udvikling nedsat et Open Access-udvalg og placeret dette under styregruppen for Danmarks Elektroniske Fag- og Forskningsbibliotek (DEFF).
With the objective of living up to these conclusions, the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation has appointed an Open Access Committee and placed this under the steering committee for Denmark's Electronic Research Library (DEFF).
1 Et repositorium er et arkiv for forskningspublikationer (ofte uden den nødvendige teknik til langtidsbevaring) http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/statistics.php
1 A repository is an archive for research publications (often without the technology needed for long-term preservation).
3 Council of the European Union; Council conclusions on scientific information in the digital age: access, dissemination and preservation. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/newsWord/en/intm/97236.doc (se også bilag 2)
3 Council of the European Union; Council conclusions on scientific information in the digital age: access, dissemination and preservation. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/newsWord/en/intm/97236.doc (also see Appendix 2)
I kommissorietfor det nationale arbejde med Open Access er følgende opgaver angivet for Open Access Udvalget:
In the mandatefor the national work with Open Access, the following assignments are stated for the Open Access Committee:
At planlægge implementeringen af Ministerrådets konklusioner
Planning the implementation of the Council of the European Union's conclusions
I forbindelse med planlægningen skal udvalget afklare:
In connection with the planning, the Committee must clarify:
Hvordan offentligt finansieret forskning gøres offentligt tilgængeligt online
How publicly funded research can be made publicly available online
Hvilke økonomiske konsekvenser der er forbundet med dette
The financial consequences associated with this
Hvordan implementeringen sikres opbakning fra danske forskere
How support for the implementation can be secured from Danish researchers
Hvilken rolle de forskningsfinansierende organer skal have i forbindelse med implementeringen
Which role the research funding bodies are to have in connection with the implementation
Hvordan der tages højde for afklaring af ophavsretslige spørgsmål
How to allow for clarification of copyright issues
At gennemføre planlægningen af Ministerrådets konklusioner
Accomplishing the planning of the Council of the European Union's conclusions
Forberede henvendelse til EU-kommissæren for Forskning og Innovation samt EU-kommissæren for Informationssamfundet og Medierne med en opfordring til, at kommissærerne udarbejder et fælles europæisk udspil til forlagsbranchen om Open Access-publicering.
Preparing an approach to the EU Commissioner for Research and Innovation and the EU Commissioner for the Information Society and the Media with a request that the commissioners prepare a joint European proposal to the publishing industry about Open Access publishing.
Udvalgets medlemmer
Members of the Committee
Bo Öhrström, vicedirektør, DEFF, Styrelsen for Bibliotek og Medier (formand) Birte Christensen-Dalsgaard, vicedirektør, Det Kongelige Bibliotek
Bo Öhrström, Deputy Director, DEFF, Danish Agency for Libraries and Media (Chairman) Birte Christensen-Dalsgaard, Deputy Director, The Royal Library
Niels-Henrik Gylstorff, overbibliotekar, Aalborg Universitet Carsten Riis, dekan, Aarhus Universitet
Niels-Henrik Gylstorff, Head Librarian, Aalborg University Carsten Riis, Dean, Aarhus University
Morten Rosenmeier, formand for Udvalget til Beskyttelse af Videnskabeligt Arbejde Nikolaj Borg Burmeister, chefkonsulent, Danske Universiteter (observatør)
Morten Rosenmeier, Chairman of the Committee for the Protection of Scientific Work Nikolaj Borg Burmeister, Chief Consultant, Danish Universities (Observer)
4 Kommissorium for det nationale arbejde med Open Access;
4 Mandate for the national work with Open Access;
Kilde: http://www.deff.dk/content.aspx?catguid={432C8A5B-1EFC-47A5-8378-0339EAED4267%7d
Source: http://www.deff.dk/content.aspx?catguid={432C8A5B-1EFC-47A5-8378-0339EAED4267%7d
Open Access Udvalget har på baggrund af en række interne arbejdsmøder samt et møde med Forlæggerforeningen i februar 2010 udarbejdet en første version af rapporten Anbefalinger til implementering af Open Access i Danmark – Rapport fra Open Access Udvalget.
The Open Access Committee has prepared the first version of the report Recommendations for Implementation of Open Access in Denmark – Report from the Open Access Committee based on a number of internal work meetings and a meeting with the Danish Publishers Association in February 2010.
Høringsprocessen resulterede i 48 høringssvar og et omfattende materiale til rapporten og den videre proces.
The consultation process resulted in 42 statements and extensive material for the report and the further process.
A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in an appropriate standard electronic format is deposited (and thus published) in at least one online repository using suitable technical standards (such as the Open Archive defini- tions) that is supported and maintained by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, inter operability, and long-term archiving.”
A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in an appropriate standard electronic format is deposited (and thus published) in at least one online repository using suitable technical standards (such as the Open Archive definitions) that is supported and maintained by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable Open Access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.”
Uanset metode betyder Open Access fri adgang til forskningsresultater, en øget synlighed og dermed øgede anvendelsesmuligheder af forskningsresultater – i forhold til det nuværende system, hvor adgangen er begrænset til de organisationer, der har råd til at betale for adgangen.
Regardless of the method, Open Access means free access to research results, increased visibility and thus possibilities for increased utilisation of research results – in comparison to the present system where access is limited to the organisations that can afford to pay for access.
5 Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities.
5 Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities.
Se: http://oa.mpg.de/lang/en-uk/berlin-prozess/berliner-erklarung/
See: http://oa.mpg.de/lang/en-uk/berlin-prozess/berliner-erklarung/
6 Costs and benefits of Alternative Publishing Models: Denmark / Professor John Houghton, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne.
6 Costs and benefits of Alternative Publishing Models: Denmark / Professor John Houghton, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne.
Kilde: http://www.deff.dk/content.aspx?catguid={79A0643A-7E30-417A-A184-18F422A6B86C%7d
Source: http://www.deff.dk/content.aspx?catguid={432C8A5B-1EFC-47A5-8378-0339EAED4267%7d common formula.
Udvalget har af samme grund afstået fra at komme med et samlet overslag over, hvad overgangen til Open Access økonomisk vil komme til at koste for den enkelte forskningsinstitution.
For the same reason, the Committee has refrained from giving an overall estimate of the financial cost of the transition to Open Access for the individual research institution.
Nogle af anbefalingerne er af politisk og strategisk karakter, mens andre er praksisorienterede og kan bidrage med ny og nødvendig viden omkring etablering og sikring af fri adgang til data og publikationer – også i et langtidsperspektiv.
Some of the recommendations are of political and strategic character, while others are more practice- orientated and may contribute new and necessary knowledge about the establishment and ensuring of Open Access to data and publications – including in a long-term perspective.
Økonomi
Finances
1 år
1 year
2 år
2 years
3 år
3 years
4 år
4 years
Udvikling af forskningsdatabase
Development of research database
1.000.000
1,000,000
Drift og projektstyring af forskningsdatabase
Operation and project management of research database
Udvikling af langtids- bevaringstjeneste for publikationer
Development of long-term preservation service for publications
2.000.000
2,000,000
Drift af langtids- bevaringstjeneste for publikationer
Operation of long-term preservation service for publications
Samlet koordinering
Complete coordination
800.000
800,000
Konsulentbistand og undersøgelser omkring videnskabelig Open Access publicering på dansk
Consultant assistance and surveys about scientific Open Access publishing in Danish
Oplysning, debat og dialog
Information, debate and dialogue
500.000
500,000
200.000
200,000
100.000
100,000
Planlægning af fri adgang og langtidsbevaring af data
Planning of Open Access and long-term preservation of data
1.100.000
1,100,00
1.100.000
1,100,000
Medlemskaber
Memberships
650.000
650,000
TOTAL
TOTAL
9.050.000
9,050,000
5.050.000
5,050,000
3.650.000
3,650,000
3.550.000
3,550,000
TOTAL for alle 4 år
TOTAL for all 4 years
21.300.000
21,300,000
Undersøgelse af behovet for ét repositorium til små forskningsinstitutioners forskningspublikationer
Study of the need for one repository for small research institutions' research publications
Danske videnskabelige forlag, videnskabelige selskaber og videnskabsredaktører udarbejder oplæg om omstilling til Open Access for videnskabelige tidsskrifter
Danish scientific publishers, scientific associations and science editors prepare discussion papers on scientific journals' transition to Open Access
Danske videnskabelige forlag og videnskabelige selskaber udarbejder oplæg om omstilling til Open Access for videnskabelige monografier
Danish scientific publishers and scientific associations prepare discussion papers on scientific monographs' transition to Open Access
National planlægning af fri adgang til samt langtidsbevaring af primære forskningsdata foretages.
National planning of Open Access to and long-term preservation of primary research data.
Grøn Open Access har fået øget global opmærksomhed de senere år og er en hurtig og kosteffektiv metode til at opnå fri adgang til accepterede og kvalitetssikrede artikler.
Green Open Access has been paid increased global interest in recent years, and it is a fast and cost- effective method for achieving Open Access to accepted and quality assured articles.
Grøn Open Access er ikke en ændring af peer review, som den foregår i dag, men betyder blot at den peer reviewed version af artiklen arkiveres i institutionens lokale repositorium.
Green Open Access is not a change of peer review, as it takes place today, it merely means that the peer- reviewed version of an article is archived in the institution's repository.
Overordnet set kan man opdele versionerne i tre grupper: the submitted work (ikke peer reviewed), the accepted work (peer reviewed) og the published work (peer reviewed og layoutet/publisher version).
In general, the versions can be divided into three groups: the submitted work (not peer-reviewed), the accepted work (peer- reviewed) and the published work (peer-reviewed and layouted/publisher version).
Ifølge Sherpa/Romeo tillader 53 % af de 788 forlag i tjenesten arkivering af den peer reviewed version.
According to Sherpa/Romeo, 53 % of the 788 publishers in the service permit archiving of the peer-reviewed version.
This means that authors may publish in nearly any journal that will accept their work (OA or non-OA) and still provide OA to the peer-reviewed text through an OA repository.
This means that authors may publish in nearly any journal that will accept their work (OA or non-OA) and still provide OA to the peer-reviewed text through an OA repository.
(Unfortunately, the compatibility of green OA with publishing in most non-OA journals is still one of the best-kept secrets of scholarly publishing.)”.
(Unfortunately, the compatibility of green OA with publishing in most non-OA journals is still one of the best-kept secrets of scholarly publishing.)”.
Open Access Udvalget ønsker at understrege, at versionen accepted work (peer reviewed) ligger så tæt på the published work (peer reviewed og layoutet/publisher version), at accepted work er en acceptabel løsning i de tilfælde, hvor det ikke er muligt at forhandle forfatterrettigheder til den endelige layoutede version.
The Open Access Committee wishes to stress that the accepted work (peer-reviewed) version is so close to the published work (peer-reviewed and layouted/publisher version) that accepted work is an acceptable solution in the cases where it is not possible to negotiate author's rights to the final layouted version.
Adskillige store internationale forlag giver allerede tilladelse til dette, og endnu flere forlag giver tilladelse, hvis forskningen er underlagt et Open Access krav, se f.eks. American Chemical Societyog Wiley-Blackwell.
Several large international publishers already give their permission for this, and even more publishers give their permission if the research is subject to Open Access requirements, cf. e.g. American Chemical Societyan Wiley-Blackwell.
7 Open Access overview.
7 Open Access overview.
Peter Suber. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm http://pubs.acs.org/page/4authors/copyright/index.html http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-321170.html
Peter Suber. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm http://pubs.acs.org/page/4authors/copyright/index.html http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-321170.html