natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mulighederne for Open Access til videnskabelige artikler i den bibliometriske forskningsindikator
The possibilities of Open Access to scientific articles in the bibliometric research indicator
I den bibliometriske forskningsindikator er ca. 350 danske forskere tilknyttet arbejdet med at udvælge de videnskabelige peer reviewed tidsskrifter, som skal kunne udløse point i indikatoren.
In the bibliometric research indicator, about 350 Danish researchers are associated with the selection of scientific peer-reviewed journals, which should trigger points in the indicator.
Open Access udvalget har udbedt sig oplysninger fra Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen med det formål at belyse muligheden for grøn Open Access til danskproducerede videnskabelige/peer re- viewed artikler på nuværende tidspunkt.
The Open Access Committee has requested information from the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation with a view to elucidating the possibility of green Open Access to Danish produced scientific /peer-reviewed articles at the present time.
Dette betyder, at man via de fire farvekoder, som anvendes i Sherpa/Romeo, kan se, hvor mange af tidsskrifterne og artiklerne i den bibliometriske forskningsindikator, som understøtter grøn Open Access.
This means that by means of the four colour codes used in Sherpa/Romeo it is possible to see how many of the journals and articles in the bibliometric research indicator support green Open Access.
Grøn Open Access af peer reviewed artikler understøttes i de tidsskrifter, som Sherpa/Romeo klassificerer som “green” (788 tidsskrifter) og “blue” (880 tidsskrifter).
Green Open Access to peer-reviewed articles is supported by the journals that Sherpa/Romeo classifies as ‘green’ (788 journals) and ‘blue’ (880 journals).
Når man ser på artiklerne i de 3000 tidsskrifter, så er der 2548 artikler i kategorien “green” og 2839 artikler i kategorien “blue”, dvs. samlet set 5387 artikler.
If you look at the articles in the 3,000 journals, there are 2,548 articles in the ‘green’ category and 2,839 articles in the ‘blue’ category, i.e. a total of 5,387 articles.
11 “White”= arkivering tillades ikke, “yellow”= arkivering før peer review er ok, “green”= arkivering af peer reviewed og endelig/published version ok, “Blue”= arkivering af peer review ok
11 ‘White’= archiving is not allowed, ‘yellow’= archiving before peer review is OK, ‘green’= archiving of peer-reviewed and final/published version OK, ‘blue’= archiving of peer review OK.
Kilde: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeoinfo.html#colours
Source: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeoinfo.html#colours
Opsummering
Summary
Hovedområderne er:
The main areas are:
At styrke koordinationen mellem medlemsstaterne af politikker og praksis med hensyn til adgang og formidling
Enhance coordination between the Member States on access and dissemination policies and practicies
At sikre langtidsbevaring af videnskabelig information, herunder publikationer og data, samt vise den videnskabelige information i nationale bevaringsstrategier behørig opmærksomhed.
Ensure long-term preservation of scientific information, including publications and data, and pay due attention to scientific information in national preservation strategies.
Hovedområde 1
Main area 1
Opgave 1.1
Assignment 1.1
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at det i regi af Forsknings- og Innovations- styrelsen og Danmarks Elektroniske Fag- og Forskningsbibliotek (DEFF) undersøges, om der eventuelt kan opnås samspil mellem den bibliometriske forskningsindikator og Open Access.
The Open Access Committee recommends a study be carried out under the auspices of the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation and Denmark’s Electronic Research Library (DEFF) to find out whether it would be possible to achieve interplay between the bibliometric research indicator and Open Access.
Anbefaling 1
Recommendation 1
Videnskabsministeriet etablerer national Open Access-politik
The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation establishes a national Open Access policy
Anbefaling 2
Recommendation 2
Forskningsråd og offentlige fonde etablerer Open Access-politikker
Research councils and public foundations establish Open Access policies
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at alle forskningsråd og offentlige fonde implementerer ensartede Open Access-politikker, der lever op til den nationale Open Access- politik.
The Open Access Committee recommends that all research councils and public foundations implement uniform Open Access policies that comply with the national Open Access policy.
Anbefaling 3
Recommendation 3
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at alle universiteter og forskningsinstitutioner etablerer Open Access-politikker, der lever op til den nationale Open Access-politik.
The Open Access Committee recommends that all universities and research institutions establish Open Access policies that comply with the national Open Access policy.
Anbefaling 4
Recommendation 4
Undersøgelse gennemføres af mulighederne for koordinering mellem den bibliometriske forskningsindikator og Open Access-politikkerne
A survey of the possibilities of coordination between the bibliometric research indicator and the Open Access policies
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at det i regi af Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen og Danmarks Elektroniske Fag- og Forskningsbibliotek (DEFF) undersøges om der eventuelt kan opnås samspil mellem den bibliometriske forskningsindikator og Open Access.
The Open Access Committee recommends that a study be carried out under the auspices of the Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation and Denmark's Electronic Research Library to establish whether it would be possible to achieve interplay between the bibliometric research indicator and Open Access.
Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen og Danmarks Elektroniske Fag- og Forsk- ningsbibliotek (DEFF) undersøger mulighederne for samspil mellem den bibliome- triske forskningsindikator og Open Access.
The Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation and Denmark's Electronic Research Library (DEFF) investigate the possibilities of achieving interaction between the bibliometric research indicator and Open Access.
Opgave 1.2
Assignment 1.2
Ved at bygge videre på denne eksisterende tekniske infrastruktur i form af forskningsregistrerings- systemet PURE og Den Danske Forskningsdatabase kan det sikres, at offentligt finansieret forskning bliver frit tilgængelig for alle brugere.
By building on this existing technical infrastructure in the form of the research registration system PURE and the Danish Research Database it will be possible to ensure that publicly funded research becomes freely accessible to all users.
Dette kræver en videreudvikling af Den Danske Forskningsdata- base og en styrket formidlingsindsats.
This requires further development of the Danish Research Database and a strengthened dissemination initiative.
I takt med at universiteterne i højere grad begynder at lagre forskningspublikationernes fulde tekst i de lokale repositorier, øges behovet for, at universiteterne og andre kan trække på langtidsbevarings- tjenester.
As the universities to a higher degree begin to store the full text of research publications in local repositories, the need increases for the universities and others to be able to draw on long-term preservation services.
For at sikre adgangen over lang tid er der således en sammenhæng med anbefaling 14 under hovedområde tre om langtidsbevaring.
In order to ensure access over a long period of time there is thus a connection with recommendation 14 under main area 3 about long-term preservation.
Der er i Danmark forskningsproducerende institutioner, som er så små, at det ikke er rentabelt for dem hver især at investere i forskningsregistreringssystemer.
In Denmark, some research producing institutions are so small that it is not feasible for each of them to invest in research registration systems.
Dette er baggrunden for anbefaling nummer seks: Undersøgelse af behovet for ét repo- sitorium til små forskningsinstitutioners forskningspublikationer.
This is the basis for recommendation number six: Survey of the need for one repository for small research institutions' research publications.
Der er muligvis en risiko for, at krav om Open Access fjerner en del af disse tidsskrifters muligheder for at sælge abonnementer, når deres artikler skal være frit tilgængelige efter en embargo-periode på 6 måneder.
There may be a risk that the requirement for Open Access will remove some of these journals' possibilities of selling subscriptions when their articles are to be freely available after an embargo period of six months.
Anbefaling 5
Recommendation 5
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i offentlige forskningsbevillinger stilles krav om, at al dansk offentligt finansieret forskning bliver tilgængelig i forskningsinstitutionernes forskningsdatabaser eller i et eventuelt kommende nationalt repositorium og via en fælles forskningsportal, som formidler de samlede forskningsresultater med klar angivelse/kreditering af det udførende universitet/forskningsinstitution.
The Open Access Committee recommends that public research grants should include requirements that all Danish publicly funded research be made available in the research institutions' research databases or in a future national repository and via a common research portal, which will disseminate all research results with clear indication of / credit given to the performing university / research institution.
Videnskabsministeriet og Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen implementerer de nødvendige krav i forskningsbevillinger
The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation and the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation implement the necessary requirements in research grants
DEFF og Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen nedsætter en arbejdsgruppe, som skal udarbejde et forslag til en fælles database baseret på Den Danske Forsk- ningsdatabase (DDF), som udnytter den eksisterende infrastruktur, og som kan facilitere samspillet med de nationale forskningsdatabaser, langtidsbevarings- tjenester og eksponere danske forskningspublikationer internationalt.
DEFF appoint a task group to prepare a proposal for a common database based on the Danish Research Database (DDF), which utilises the existing infrastructure and which can facilitate interplay with the international research databases and long-term preservation services as well as expose Danish research publications internationally
Udvikling af en fælles portal baseret på DDF: 1 mio. kr.
Development of a common portal based on DDF: DKK 1 million.
Drift, support og formidling årligt: 1 mio. kr.
Operation, support and dissemination per year: DKK 1 million.
Anbefaling 6
Recommendation 6
Anbefaling 7
Recommendation 7
Der afsættes en ramme på 500.000 kr., som kan anvendes til undersøgelser og konsulentbistand.
A framework amount of DKK 500,000 is allocated for surveys and consultant assistance.
Anbefaling 8
Recommendation 8
Opgave 1.3
Assignment 1.3
Denne rådgivning bør tænkes ind i den lokale implementering af universiteternes Open Access- politikker.
This guidance should be incorporated into the local implementation of the universities' Open Access policies.
Opgave 1.4
Assignment 1.4
I Danmark har alle universiteterne forskningsregistreringssystemer og repositorier, der er drevet og finansieret som øvrige dele af den lokale digitale infrastruktur.
In Denmark, all universities have research registration systems and repositories that are run and financed like other parts of the local digital infrastructure.
På nationalt plan drejer det sig om protokoller til dataudveksling (OAI-PMH) og om dataformater (DDF-MXD) til brug for bl.a. den bibliometriske forskningsindikator og den fælles portal til formidling af danske forskningsresultater.
At a national level, this concerns protocols for data exchange (OAI-PMH) and data formats (DDF-MXD) for use in e.g. the bibliometric research indicator and the common portal for dissemination of Danish research results.
Opgave 1.5
Assignment 1.5
Implementeringen skal ske under hensyntagen til universiteter, andre forskningsproduce- rende institutioner, forskningsråd og forlæggere.
The implementation should take place with due consideration for universities, other research procuding institutions, research councils and publishers.
Anbefaling 9
Recommendation 9
Open Access Udvalget overvåger implementeringen af videnskabs- ministerens Open Access-strategi
The Open Access Committee monitors the implementation of the Minister of Science's Open Access strategy
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at udvalget sekretariatsbetjenes af DEFF og overvåger og koordinerer implementeringen af videnskabsministerens Open Access- strategi i en projektperiode på fire år.
The Open Access Committee recommends that the Committee be given secretariat assistance from DEFF andmonitor and coordinate the implementation of the Minister of Science's Open Access strategy for a project period of four years.
800.000 kr. årligt i 4 år.
DKK 800,000 annually for four years.
Anbefaling 10
Recommendation 10
Styrke og understøtte information, debat og dialog
Strengthening and supporting information, debate and dialogue
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i forbindelse med koordinering af implementeringen af Open Access Udvalgets anbefalinger gennemføres en informationskampagne med debat og dialog omkring Open Access målrettet forskermiljøer i form af f.eks. informationsmateriale og konferencer.
The Open Access Committee recommends that in connection with the coordination of the implementation of the Open Access Committee's recommendations an information campaign be carried out with debate and dialogue about Open Access, targeted at research environments in the form of e.g. information material and conferences.
Hovedområde 2
Main area 2
Opgave 2.1
Assignment 2.1
Anbefaling 11
Recommendation 11
Anbefalingen implementeres af Det Frie Forskningsråd, Det Strategiske Forskningsråd, Danmarks Grundforskningsfond, Højteknologifonden og Rådet for Teknologi og Innovation.
The recommendation is implemented by the Danish Council for Independent Research, the Danish Council for Strategic Research, the Danish National Research Foundation, the Danish National Advanced Technology Foundation and the Danish Council for Technology and Innovation.
Opgave 2.2
Assignment 2.2
At øge gennemsigtigheden af de kontraktmæssige betingelser i forbindelse med ‘big deals’ finansieret af offentlige midler - og at vurdere muligheden for at opnå ‘economies of scale’ ved aggregering af efterspørgslen
Improving transparency of the contractual terms of ‘big deals’ financed with public money, and assessing the possibilities to achieve economies of scale by demand aggregation
Dette er sket i Nederlandene, hvor man på nationalt plan har indgået en aftale med Springer om fri adgang til alle forsk- ningspublikationer publiceret af hollandske universitetsforskere hos Springer i 2010.
This has happened in the Netherlands where an agreement at national level has been made with Springer about Open Access to all research publications published on behalf of Dutch university researchers by Springer in 2010.
Anbefaling 12
Recommendation 12
Øget fokus på Open Access i DEFF konsortielicenser
Increased focus on Open Access in DEFF consortium licenses
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i DEFFs licensarbejde og i de internationale samarbejder, hvori DEFF indgår, sættes fokus på forhandling af forfatterafgifter ifm. gylden Open Access, frihed til grøn Open Access og transparente forretningsmodeller for Open Access-publicering mod betaling.
The Open Access Committee recommends that in DEFF's work with licences and in the international partnerships in which DEFF takes part, focus be directed at negotiation of writers' royalties in connection with golden Open Access, freedom to green Open Access and transparent business models for Open Access publishing at a fee.
DEFF laver en plan for Open Access-aktiviteterne for licensområdet
DEFF prepares a plan for Open Access activities for the license area.
Planen godkendes af Open Access Udvalget
The plan is approved by the Open Access Committee.
Opgave 2.3
Assignment 2.3
Anbefaling 13
Recommendation 13
DEFF bliver medlem på vegne af de danske repositorier
DEFF becomes a member on behalf of the Danish repositories.
DEFF sikrer, at aktiviteter og resultater forankres bredt.
DEFF ensures that activities and results are anchored widely.
Opgave 2.4
Assignment 2.4
Der eksperimenteres i internationalt regi med forskellige alternative publiceringsmodeller, og eventuelle danske erfaringer bør udbredes og afrapporteres til EU-Kommissionen.
Various alternative publishing models are being tested internationally, and any Danish experience should be disseminated and reported on to the EU Commission.
13 Kilde: http://www.fi.dk/forskning/den-bibliometriske-forskningsindikator
13 Source: http://www.fi.dk/forskning/den-bibliometriske-forskningsindikator
Hovedområde 3
Main area 3
I Danmark sikrer Lov om Pligtaflevering af offentliggjort materiale langtidsbevaring på publikations- området, men når det handler om forskningsdata, er situationen en anden.
In Denmark, the Act on Legal Deposit of Published Material ensures long-term preservation of publications, but when it comes to research data, the situation is quite different.
Der findes ikke dækkende nationale løsninger for langtidsbevaring af videnskabelige data, dog har forskere, der har indsamlet survey data med støtte fra Det Frie Forskningsråd | Samfund og Erhverv, Det Frie Forskningsråd | Sundhed og Sygdom samt fra en del programkomitéer under Det Strategiske Forskningsråd, pligt til at arkivere data i Dansk Data Arkiv (DDA).
However, researchers who have gathered survey data with funding from the Danish Council for Independent Research | Society and Business, the Danish Council for Independent Research | Society and Health and from a number of programme committees under the auspices of the Danish Council for Strategic Research have a formal obligation to archive data with the Danish Data Archive (DDA).
Opgave 3.1
Assignment 3.1
Som nævnt ovenfor under opgave 1.2 vokser universiteternes behov for at kunne trække på langtids- bevaringstjenester i takt med, at de i stadig højere grad lagrer forskningspublikationernes fulde tekst i deres lokale repositorier.
As mentioned above under Assignment 1.2, the universities increasingly need to be able to draw on long-term preservation services as they increasingly store the full text of research publications in their local repositories.
Ligeledes skal sikres, at forskningsregistreringssystemet PURE ved opdateringer fremover understøtter OAI-høstning fra PIN- DAR.
Provisions should also be made to ensure that the research registration system PURE supports OAI harvesting from PINDAR through updates.
Som nævnt under anbefaling fem, vil den fælles forskningsdatabase for danske forskningspublikatio- ner kunne lette overførslen af publikationer til den nationale langtidsbevaringstjeneste, der således kan fokusere kræfterne på selve den funktionelle bevaring af publikationerne.
As mentioned under Recommendation 5, the common research database for Danish research publications will ease the transfer of publications to the national long-term preservation service, which can then focus its efforts on the actual functional preservation of the publications.
Statsbiblioteket og Det Kongelige Bibliotek deltager i EU-projektet Preservation and Long- term Access through Networked Services (PLANETS), hvor udfordringer i forhold til langtidsbevaring adresseres af et udvalg af nationalbiblioteker, nationale arkiver og universiteter.
The State and University Library and the Royal Library participate in the EU project Preservation and Long-term Access through Networked Services (PLANETS), where the challenges in relation to long-term preservation are addressed by a number of national libraries, national archives and universities.
Med hensyn til bevaring af data (primærdata, forskningsdata) er situationen en anden, og der er i høj grad behov for midler samt en fælles indsats og planlægning blandt de relevante aktører som universiteterne, Dansk Data Arkiv, nationalbiblioteker, forskningsbiblioteker og forskergrupperne.
As regards preservation of data (primary data, research data), the situation is somewhat different, and there is a great need for funds and a joint effort and planning among the relevant players such as universities, the Danish Data Archive, the national libraries, research libraries and research groups.
I den fælles indsats skal der tillige ses på aktiviteter hos NordForsk og EU.
Part of the joint effort will involve looking at activities at NordForsk and the EU.
Når det gælder samfundsvidenskabelige survey data findes der en international dokumentationsstan- dard, DDI.
When it comes to socio-economic survey data, there is an international documentation standard, DDI.
Anbefaling 14
Recommendation 14
Dækkende langtidsbevaringstjeneste for videnskabelige publikationer etableres
Establishment of comprehensive long-term preservation of scientific publications
Open Access Udvalget anbefaler, at der i tilknytning til den fælles forskningsdatabase for formidling af danske forskningsresultater (anbefaling fem) etableres en langtids- bevaringstjeneste, der sikrer, at digitale publikationer kan læses og udnyttes over lang tid.
The Open Access Committee recommends that in relation to the common portal for dissemination of Danish research results (Recommendation 5), a long-term preservation service be established that will ensure that digital publications can be read and utilised for a long period of time.
Det Kongelige Bibliotek gennemfører en undersøgelse af universiteternes og andre forskningsproducerende institutioners behov og præferencer samt den internationale state-of-the-art på området
The Royal Library carries out a survey of universities' and other research producing institutions' needs and preferences and of the international state-of-the art in the area
På baggrund af undersøgelsen udarbejdes et forslag til langtidsbevaringstjene- stens overordnede funktionalitet og samspil med den fælles portal og universiteternes repositorier.
Based on this survey, a proposal is prepared for the long-term preservation services' general functionality and interplay with the common portal and the universities' repositories.
Forslaget evalueres af Open Access Udvalget og Kulturministeriet
The Open Access Committee and the Ministry of Culture evaluate the proposal
Forslaget sendes i høring blandt interessenterne
The proposal is submitted for hearing among the stakeholders
Undersøgelse af behov samt udvikling af langtidsbevaringstjenesten: 2 mio. kr.
Survey of needs and development of long-term preservation service: DKK 2 million.
Drift og support af tjenesten årligt: 1 mio. kr.
Operation and support of service per year: DKK 1 million.
14 Riding the wave - How Europe can gain from the rising tide of scientific data.
14 Riding the wave – How Europe can gain from the rising tide of scientific data.
Final report of the High level Expert Group on Scientific Data.
Final report of the High-level Expert Group on Scientific Data.
A submission to the European Commission October 2010 http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/itemlongdetail.cfm?item_id=6204
A submission to the European Commission, October 2010 http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/itemlongdetail.cfm?item_id=6204
Anbefaling 15
Recommendation 15
National planlægning af fri adgang til samt langtidsbevaring af primære forskningsdata foretages
National planning of Open Access to and long-term preservation of primary research data
Det påtænkes, at det nye organ blandt andet får til opgave at håndtere lagerkapacitet for danske forskningsmiljøer.
The plan is that one of the new body's tasks will be to handle storage capacity for Danish research environments.
2.2 mio. kr. i alt over 2 år.
DKK 2.2 million in total over two years.
Opgave 3.2
Assignment 3.2
Anbefaling 16
Recommendation 16
Dansk medlemskab af centrale internationale samarbejdsfora for håndtering og langtidsbevaring af videnskabelig information i bredeste forstand indgås
Danish membership of central international collaboration forums for handling and long-term preservation of scientific information in the widest sense