natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Grøn Open Access betyder, at man arkiverer den peer reviewed version af en videnskabelig artikel i et repositorium, hvorefter den er frit tilgængelig for alle.
Green Open Access means that the peer-reviewed version of a scientific article is archived in a repository, after which it is freely available to everybody.
Gylden Open Access omfatter tidsskrifter, som tilbyder en Open Access publiceringsmodel omfattende hele tidsskriftet eller enkelte artikler.
Gold Open Access includes journals that offer an Open Access publishing model including the entire journal or individual articles.
I praksis betyder dette, at man ikke betaler abonnement/licens, men derimod betaler for at publicere i tidsskriftet, hvorefter artiklen er frit tilgængelig for alle.
In practice, this means that you do not pay a subscription/license fee, but instead you pay to publish in the journal, after which the article becomes freely available to everybody.
Open Access Udvalget har udarbejdet anbefalinger, som sikrer fri adgang til resultaterne af offentligt finansieret forskning.
The Open Access Committee has prepared recommendations that ensure Open Access to the results of publicly funded research.
Udvalget mener, at grøn Open Access klart er den mest farbare vej, idet den nødvendige infrastruktur fuldt ud er til stede i Danmark.
The Committee believes that green Open Access is the most appropriate path, as the necessary infrastructure is already fully in place in Denmark.
Samtidig tillader mange internationale tidsskrifter allerede den form for parallelpublicering af peer reviewed artikler, som grøn Open Access repræsenterer
Furthermore, many international journals already permit the form of parallel publishing of peer-reviewed articles that green Open Access represents.
Gylden Open Access forudsætter i større udstrækning, at forlagene har omlagt deres tidsskrifter til Open Access-forretningsmodellen, og at de samlede omkostninger for Danmark ikke øges herved.
Golden Open Access presupposes to a higher degree that the publishers have adapted their journals to the Open Access business model and that the overall cost for Denmark is not increased by this.
I dag forsøger visse forlag at tilbyde forfatterne et Open Access-frikøb af den enkelte artikel, samtidig med at institutionen betaler for at abonnere på selvsamme tidsskrift.
Today, certain publishers seek to offer authors the option of an Open Access buy-out of the individual article, while at the same time the institution pays to subscribe to the very same journal.
Denne form for dobbeltbetaling vurderes som helt urealistisk og uantagelig, hvorfor forlagene må stimuleres til at omlægge til Open Access for en betaling, der ikke overstiger den nuværende.
This sort of double payment is considered completely unrealistic and unacceptable, and the publishers should be encouraged to adapt to Open Access at a fee that does not exceed the present.
Regeringen har ved videnskabsministeren tiltrådt Ministerrådets konklusioner om videnskabelig information i den digitale tidsalder
The Government, represented by the Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, has approved the Council of the European Union's conclusions about scientific information in the digital age.
Open Access Udvalget er nedsat under DEFF-styregruppen med direkte reference til Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen.
The Open Access Committee has been appointed under the DEFF Steering Committee with direct reference to the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation.
I kommissoriet4 for det nationale arbejde med Open Access er følgende opgaver angivet for Open Access Udvalget:
In the mandate4 for the national work with Open Access, the following assignments are stated for the Open Access Committee:
1) At planlægge implementeringen af Ministerrådets konklusioner
1) Planning the implementation of the Council of the European Union's conclusions
2) I forbindelse med planlægningen skal udvalget afklare: a) Hvordan offentligt finansieret forskning gøres offentligt tilgængeligt online b) Hvilke økonomiske konsekvenser der er forbundet med dette c) Hvordan implementeringen sikres opbakning fra danske forskere d) Hvilken rolle de forskningsfinansierende organer skal have i forbindelse med implementeringen e) Hvordan der tages højde for afklaring af ophavsretslige spørgsmål
2) In connection with the planning, the Committee must clarify: a) How publicly funded research can be made publicly available online b) The financial consequences associated with this c) How support for the implementation can be secured from Danish researchers d) Which role the research funding bodies are to have in connection with the implementation e) How to allow for clarification of copyright issues
3) At gennemføre planlægningen af Ministerrådets konklusioner
3) Accomplishing the planning of the Council of the European Union's conclusions
4) Forberede henvendelse til EU-kommissæren for Forskning og Innovation samt EU-kommissæren for Informationssamfundet og Medierne med en opfordring til, at kommissærerne udarbejder et fælles europæisk udspil til forlagsbranchen om Open Access-publicering.
4) Preparing an approach to the EU Commissioner for Research and Innovation and the EU Commissioner for the Information Society and the Media with a request that the commissioners prepare a joint European proposal to the publishing industry about Open Access publishing.
Bo Öhrström, vicedirektør, DEFF, Styrelsen for Bibliotek og Medier (formand)
Bo Öhrström, Deputy Director, DEFF, Danish Agency for Libraries and Media (Chairman)
Birte Christensen-Dalsgaard, vicedirektør, Det Kongelige Bibliotek
Birte Christensen-Dalsgaard, Deputy Director, The Royal Library
Niels-Henrik Gylstorff, overbibliotekar, Aalborg Universitet
Niels-Henrik Gylstorff, Head Librarian, Aalborg University
Carsten Riis, dekan, Aarhus Universitet
Carsten Riis, Dean, Aarhus University
Mogens Sandfær, direktør, DTIC, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Mogens Sandfær, Director, DTIC, Technical University of Denmark
Grete M. Kladakis, kontorchef, Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen
Grete M. Kladakis, Head of Department, Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation
Anders Bjørneboe, chefkonsulent, Universitets- og Bygningsstyrelsen
Anders Bjørneboe, Chief Consultant, Danish University and Property Agency
Morten Rosenmeier, formand for Udvalget til Beskyttelse af Videnskabeligt Arbejde
Morten Rosenmeier, Chairman of the Committee for the Protection of Scientific Work
Nikolaj Borg Burmeister, chefkonsulent, Danske Universiteter (observatør)
Nikolaj Borg Burmeister, Chief Consultant, Danish Universities (Observer)
Lise Mikkelsen, specialkonsulent, DEFF, Styrelsen for Bibliotek og Medier (sekretær).
Lise Mikkelsen, Special Consultant, DEFF, Danish Agency for Libraries and Media (Secretary)
Open Access Udvalget har på baggrund af en række interne arbejdsmøder samt et møde med Forlæggerforeningen i februar 2010 udarbejdet en første version af rapporten Anbefalinger til implementering af Open Access i Danmark - Rapport fra Open Access Udvalget.
The Open Access Committee has prepared the first version of the report Recommendations for Implementation of Open Access in Denmark - Report from the Open Access Committee based on a number of internal work meetings and a meeting with the Danish Publishers Association in February 2010.
Rapporten blev sendt i bred høring 1. maj 2010.
The report was sent out for general consultation on 1 May 2010.
Open Access Udvalget har på denne baggrund valgt at producere en revideret, udbygget version af den første rapport som grundlag for det videre arbejde.
Based on this, the Open Access Committee has chosen to produce a revised, amplified version of the first report as the basis for the continued work.
Samtidig har man udarbejdet et forslag til en national Open Access strategi for Danmark.
The Committee has also prepared a proposal for a national Open Access strategy for Denmark.
Open Access Udvalget har i sit arbejde taget udgangspunkt i Berlin-deklarationens 5 definition af
The Open Access Committee has based its work on the Berlin Declaration's 5 definition of Open
Open Access: “Open Access contributions must satisfy two conditions:
Access:“Open Access contributions must satisfy two conditions:
2. A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in an appropriate standard electronic format is deposited (and thus published) in at least one online repository using suitable technical standards (such as the Open Archive definitions) that is supported and maintained by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, inter operability, and long-term archiving.”
2. A complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in an appropriate standard electronic format is deposited (and thus published) in at least one online repository using suitable technical standards (such as the Open Archive definitions) that is supported and maintained by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable Open Access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.”
Open Access Udvalgets anbefalinger omfatter alle forskningsinstitutioner, som udfører forskning baseret helt eller delvist på offentlige midler, og som i forbindelse med forskningen publicerer videnskabelige publikationer.
The Open Access Committee's recommendations encompass all research institutions that carry out research based entirely or partially on public funds and which publish scientific publications in connection with the research.
Der er altså ikke kun tale om universiteter, men tillige sektorforskning, regioner m.m.
Thus, this does not only include universities, but also sector research, regions etc.
Uanset metode betyder Open Access fri adgang til forskningsresultater, en øget synlighed og dermed øgede anvendelsesmuligheder af forskningsresultater - i forhold til det nuværende system, hvor adgangen er begrænset til de organisationer, der har råd til at betale for adgangen.
Regardless of the method, Open Access means free access to research results, increased visibility and thus possibilities for increased utilisation of research results - in comparison to the present system where access is limited to the organisations that can afford to pay for access.
Derudover kan de økonomiske konsekvenser for implementering af Open Access på et samfundsøkonomisk niveau estimeres.
Furthermore, the financial consequences of implementation of Open Access at a socio-economic level can be estimated.
Denne rapports konklusion er, at afhængig af investering kan den samlede gevinst for Danmark ved at indføre Open Access globalt være betydelig samtidig med omfattende besparelser i den værdikæde, som producerer videnskabelige artikler.
This report's conclusion is that depending on investments, the overall benefit for Denmark by introducing Open Access globally will be significant, while at the same time it will result in extensive savings in the value chain that produces scientific articles.
Besparelserne stammer fra mindre tidsforbrug hos forskerne og et mere velfungerende system for forskningskommunikation.
The savings are derived from less time consumption at the researcher's end and a more efficient system for research communication.
Den samfundsøkonomiske gevinst kommer primært fra, at flere institutioner, virksomheder og borgere får hurtig og bedre adgang til forskningspublikationer.
The socio-economic benefit is primarily achieved by more institutions, companies and citizens gaining quicker and better access to research publications.
Open Access Udvalget har ikke ønsket at komme med anvisninger på, hvordan den enkelte forskningsinstitution kan tilrettelægge en overgang til Open Access.
The Open Access Committee has not wished to suggest how the individual research institution should organise a transition to Open Access.
En sådan overgang vil afspejle den enkelte institutionsledelses forsknings- og formidlingsstrategiske overvejelser og kan således ikke sættes på en fælles formel.
Such a transition will reflect the individual institution's management's research and dissemination strategic considerations and therefore, it cannot be reduced to a
Open Access Udvalget har valgt at disponere sin rapport som en implementeringsplan, der tager udgangspunkt i Ministerrådets konklusioner: “Council Conclusions on scientific information in the digital age: access, dissemination and preservation” (Bilag 2).
The Open Access Committee has chosen to organise its report as an implementation plan based on the Council of the European Union's conclusions: “Council Conclusions on scientific information in the digital age: access, dissemination and preservation” (Appendix 2).
Implementeringsplanen består af en række anbefalinger med angivelse af proces, aktører og økonomi.
The implementation plan consists of a number of recommendations with indication of process, players and finances.
Nogle af anbefalingerne er af politisk og strategisk karakter, mens andre er praksisorienterede og kan bidrage med ny og nødvendig viden omkring etablering og sikring af fri adgang til data og publikationer - også i et langtidsperspektiv.
Some of the recommendations are of political and strategic character, while others are more practiceorientated and may contribute new and necessary knowledge about the establishment and ensuring of Open Access to data and publications - including in a long-term perspective.
I henhold til kommissoriet vil Open Access Udvalget efterfølgende, i forbindelse med implementering af planen i dens godkendte form, have til opgave at følge implementeringen og sikre fremdriften.
In accordance with its mandate, the Open Access Committee will subsequently, in connection with the implementation of the plan in its approved form, be charged with monitoring the implementation and ensuring the progress.
Open Access Udvalget har beregnet omkostninger til en række anbefalinger, mens der ved andre anbefalinger skal laves et forarbejde, som skal resultere i projektplaner og beregninger af omkostninger.
The Open Access Committee has calculated the costs of a number of recommendations, while in relation to other recommendations, preparatory work needs to be carried out, which should result in project plans and calculations of costs.
Nedenstående tabel viser de estimerede omkostninger.
The table below shows estimated costs.
Derudover afventer Open Access Udvalget økonomiske beregninger af følgende anbefalinger:
Additionally, the Open Access Committee awaits financial calculations for the following recommendations:
Grøn Open Access har fået øget global opmærksomhed de senere år og er en hurtig og kosteffektiv metode til at opnå fri adgang til accepterede og kvalitetssikrede artikler.
Green Open Access has been paid increased global interest in recent years, and it is a fast and costeffective method for achieving Open Access to accepted and quality assured articles.
Grøn Open Access er ikke en ændring af peer review, som den foregår i dag, men betyder blot at den peer reviewed version af artiklen arkiveres i institutionens lokale repositorium.
Green Open Access is not a change of peer review, as it takes place today, it merely means that the peerreviewed version of an article is archived in the institution's repository.
En anden relevant problemstilling omkring kvalitet er spørgsmålet om, hvilken version af den videnskabelige publikation som skal underlægges krav om Open Access.
Another relevant issue in relation to quality is the question of which version of a scientific publication should be subject to requirements about Open Access.
I praksis anvendes der forskellige begreber for de versioner, der findes af videnskabelige artikler, fra de sendes til et forlag, og til de ligger i en publiceret version på forlagets hjemmeside.
In practice, different terms are used for the different versions of scientific articles that are available, from the time they are sent off to a publisher until a version is published on the publisher's website.
Overordnet set kan man opdele versionerne i tre grupper: the submitted work (ikke peer reviewed), the accepted work (peer reviewed) og the published work (peer reviewed og layoutet/publisher version).
In general, the versions can be divided into three groups: the submitted work (not peer-reviewed), the accepted work (peerreviewed) and the published work (peer-reviewed and layouted/publisher version).
Et submitted work er en artikel, som er sendt til et forlag mhp. udgivelse, dvs. den er endnu ikke peer reviewed.
A submitted work is an article that has been forwarded to a publisher with a view to publishing, i.e. it has not yet been peer-reviewed.
The accepted work har gennemgået peer review og er accepteret til udgivelse.
The accepted work has been through a peer review and has been accepted for publishing.
The published work er tillige den version, som ligger på forlagets hjemmeside.
The published work is the version that is available at the publisher's website.
Sherpa/Romeo er en tjeneste, som drives af University of Nottingham i samarbejde med 33 partnere.
Sherpa/Romeo is a service run by the University of Nottingham in collaboration with 33 partners.
Sherpa/Romeo indeholder information om forlags copyright politikker og selv-arkivering og er dermed et meget anvendeligt redskab i arbejdet med at afklare forskellige forlags OA politikker.
Sherpa/Romeo contains information about publishers' copyright policies and self-archiving, and thus, it is a very useful tool in relation to the work to clarify different publishers' OA policies.
Grøn Open Access er altså en mulighed, som rigtig mange internationale forlag allerede tillader.
In other words, green Open Access is an option that many international publishers already permit.
Udfordringen er, at forfatterne skal sikre sig rettighederne: “Because most publishers and journals already give blanket permission for green OA, the burden is on authors to take advantage of the opportunity.
The challenge is that the authors need to secure the rights: “Because most publishers and journals already give blanket permission for green OA, the burden is on authors to take advantage of the opportunity.
I forbindelse med det kommende arbejde med udarbejdelse af OA politikker må de relevante interessenter diskutere kvalitetssikringen, og der skal tages højde for eventuelle forskelle mellem fagområder.
In connection with the coming work on the elaboration of OA policies, the relevant stakeholders will have to discuss quality assurance, and they will need to make allowance for any differences between various disciplines.
Men Open Access Udvalget understreger, at man ikke opfatter Open Access som et problem for den videnskabelige kvalitetssikring, og at repositorier er et supplement til videnskabelige tidsskrifter - ikke en erstatning.
However, the Open Access Committee stresses that Open Access is not considered a problem in relation to scientific quality assurance, and that repositories are a supplement to scientific journals - not a replacement.
Danske forskere skal stadigvæk publicere i tidsskrifter som sikrer peer review, og de skal stadigvæk stile efter at publicere i de bedste og mest anerkendte tidsskrifter.
Danish researchers should continue to publish in journals that ensure peer review, and they should continue to strive to be published in the best and most respected journals.
Men de skal samtidig bibeholde en del af deres copyright, så de får lov til at arkivere den peer reviewed version af deres videnskabelige publikationer i institutionens repositorium.
However, they should also retain a part of their copyright, so that they are allowed to archive the peer-reviewed version of their scientific publications in the institution's repository.
En ny undersøgelse konkluderer, at fordelen ved at publicere Open Access er statistisk signifikant: “The OA advantage is greater for the more citable articles, not because of a quality bias from authors self-selecting what to make OA, but because of a quality advantage, from users self-selecting what to use and cite, freed by OA from the constraints of selective accessibility to subscribers only.”
A new survey concludes that the advantage gained from publishing Open Access is statistically significant: “The OA advantage is greater for the more citable articles, not because of a quality bias from authors self-selecting what to make OA, but because of a quality advantage, from users self-selecting what to use and cite, freed by OA from the constraints of selective accessibility to subscribers only.
Autoritetslisten for tidsskrifter er underopdelt i 67 fagområder og 1 tværvidenskabelig liste.
The authority list for journals is subdivided into 67 disciplines and 1 interdisciplinary list.
Tidsskrifterne er entydigt placeret i én faggruppe, for at undgå overlap mellem faggruppernes valg af tidsskrifter.
The journals are unambiguously placed in one subject group in order to avoid overlaps between the subject group's choice of journals.
Listen gennemgås årligt og er et bud på en national vurdering af, hvad der er de bedste videnskabelige tidsskrifter i verden set med danske forskeres øjne.
The list is reviewed annually and is an indication of a national assessment of which scientific journals are the best in the world seen through the eyes of Danish researchers.
Autoritetslisten over tidsskrifter og indikatorstatistikken er derfor et relevant udgangspunkt for at vurdere mulighederne for Open Access til dansk producerede videnskabelige artikler.
The authority list of journals and the indicator statistics are therefore a relevant starting point for assessing the possibilities of Open Access to Danish produced scientific articles.
Open Access udvalget har udbedt sig oplysninger fra Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen med det formål at belyse muligheden for grøn Open Access til danskproducerede videnskabelige/peer reviewed artikler på nuværende tidspunkt.
The Open Access Committee has requested information from the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation with a view to elucidating the possibility of green Open Access to Danish produced scientific /peer-reviewed articles at the present time.
Tallene er fra indikatorstatistikken 2010.
The figures are from the indicator statistics 2010.
Indikatorstatistik og Open Access
Indicator statistics and Open Access
Autoritetslisten over tidsskrifter i den bibliometriske forskningsindikator indeholder oplysninger om publiceringsrettigheder fra Sherpa/Romeo.
The authority list of journals in the bibliometric research indicator contains information from Sherpa/Romeo about publishing rights.
Dette betyder, at man via de fire farvekoder, som anvendes i Sherpa/Romeo, kan se, hvor mange af tidsskrifterne og artiklerne i den bibliometriske forskningsindikator, som understøtter grøn Open Access
This means that by means of the four colour codes used in Sherpa/Romeo it is possible to see how many of the journals and articles in the bibliometric research indicator support green Open Access.
Samlet set har 3000 (75 %) af de 3998 tidsskrifter, som der er danske bidrag i, og som tæller i indikatoren i 2010, oplysninger fra Sherpa/Romeo.
In total, 3,000 (75 %) of the 3,998 journals in which there are Danish contributions and which count in the indicator in 2010, have information from Sherpa/Romeo.
Alle nedenstående analyser af grøn Open Access tager udgangspunkt i disse 3000 tidsskrifter.
All of the analyses of green Open Access below are based on these 3,000 journals.
Grøn Open Access af peer reviewed artikler understøttes i de tidsskrifter, som Sherpa/Romeo klassificerer som “green” (788 tidsskrifter) og “blue” (880 tidsskrifter).
Green Open Access to peer-reviewed articles is supported by the journals that Sherpa/Romeo classifies as ‘green' (788 journals) and ‘blue' (880 journals).